United Nations
    Environment Programme
                   United States
                   Environmental Protection
                   Agency
                         October 1986
o.
V
t
EFFECTS OF CHANGES IN STRATOSPHERIC
OZONE AND GLOBAL CLIMATE
Volume 4' Sea Level Rise

-------
Library of Congress Cataloging - In - Publication Data
Effects of changes in stratospheric ozone and global climate.
Proceedings of a conference convened by the United Nations Environment
Programme and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Contents:  v. 1. Overview — v.  2.  Stratospheric ozone — v.  3. Climate
change. — v. 4.  Sea level rise
1. Atmospheric ozone—Reduction—Congresses.   2. Stratosphere—Con-
gresses.   3. Global  temperature   changes—Congresses.   4.  Climatic
changes—Congresses.  5.  Sea level—Congresses.  6. Greenhouse  effect,
Atmospheric—Congresses.  7. Ultraviolet   radiation—Congresses.   I.
Titus, James G    II. United States Environmental Protection Agency. III.
United Nations  Environment  Programme.

-------
EFFECTS OF  CHANGES IN STRATOSPHERIC
         OZONE AND GLOBAL CLIMATE
              Volume 4:  Sea Level Rise
                          Edited by
                        James G. Titus
              U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
        This report represents the proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL CON-
        FERENCE ON HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS OF
        OZONE MODIFICATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE sponsored by the
        United Nations Environment Programme and the  U.S. Environmental
        Protection Agency. The purpose of the conference was to make available
        the widest possible set of views. Accordingly, the views expressed herein
        are solely  those of the authors and do not represent official positions of
        either agency. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not
        constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
PREFACE
     This document  is  part  of  a four  volume  report  that examines the possible
consequences  of changes  in  stratospheric  ozone  and global climate resulting
from  emissions  of chlorofluorocarbons,  carbon  dioxide,  methane,  and  other
gases  released  by  human  activities.    In   June  1986,  the United  Nations
Environment Programme  and the  U.  S. Environmental Protection Agency sponsored
an International Conference on the Health and Environmental Effects  of Ozone
Modification   and   Climate  Change,  which was  attended   by  scientists  and
officials,  representing twenty-one countries  from all areas  of the world.

     This volume examines  the effects of the  rise in sea  level  that might
result  from  a  global  warming.   Volume  1   of  the proceedings provides  an
overview of the issues as well as the introductory  remarks  and reactions from
top officials of the United Nations  and the  United States.   Volumes  2 and 3
focus on the  effects of ozone depletion and climate  change,  respectively.

     This  report  does not  present  the  official  views  of either  the  U.S.
Environmental Protection  Agency or the United Nations Environment Programme.

-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Overview of the Effects  of  Changing the Atmosphere
     James G. Titus and  Stephen R. Seidel	   1

Future Sea Level Rise  and Its Early Detection by Satellite  Remote
  Sensing
     Robert H. Thomas  	  19

Flooding in Taipei, Taiwan  and Coastal Drainage
     Chin Y. Kuo 	  37

The Sea Also Rises:
  The Ongoing Dialogue of the Dutch with the Sea
     Tom Goemans 	  M7

Planning for Sea Level Rise Under Uncertainty:  A Case Study  of
  Charleston, South Carolina
     Micnael J. Gibbs  	  57

Coastal Geomorphic Impacts  of Sea Level Rise on Coasts of South  America
     Stephen P. Leatherman  	  73

Potential Effects of Sea Level Rise on the Coasts of Australia,
  Africa, and Asia
     Eric C. F. Bird 	  83

Worldwide Impact of Sea  Level Rise on Shorelines
     Per Bruun 	  99

Predicting the Effects of Sea Level Rise on Coastal Wetlands
     Richard A. Park,  Thomas V. Armentano, and
     C. Leslie Cloonan 	 129

-------
Increased Storms and Estuarine Salinity and other Ecological
  Impacts of the "Greenhouse Effect"
     Donald P.  de Sylva 	 153

Rising Sea level and Damming of Rivers:  Possible Effects
  in Egypt and  Bangladesh
     James M. Broadus,  John D. Milliman, Steven F. Edwards
     David G. Aubrey, and Frank Gable 	 155

Sea Level Rise:   The Reaction of a Coastal Realtor
     Kenneth J.  Smith 	 191
                                      vi

-------
Overview of the Effects of Changing the Atmosphere
James G. Titus and Stephen R. Seidel
Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, DC USA
INTRODUCTION

     Society is  conducting  a global  experiment  on the earth's  atmosphere.
Human activities are  increasing  the  worldwide  atmospheric  concentrations of
chlorofluorocarbons,  carbon  dioxide,   methane,  and  several other  gases.   A
growing body of  scientific evidence suggests that  if  these trends  continue,
stratospheric ozone  may  decline and global temperature may  rise.   Because  the
ozone layer shields  the earth's  surface  from damaging ultraviolet  radiation
(UV) future depletion could increase  the  incidence of  skin cancer  and  other
diseases,  reduce  crop yields, damage materials,  and  place additional stress on
aquatic plants  and  animals.   A  global warming from  tire "greenhouse  effect"
could also threaten  human health, crop yields,  property,\ fish, and  wildlife.
Precipitation  and storm  patterns  could change, and the level of  the oceans
could eventually  rise.

     To  improve  the  world's  understanding  of  these and  other  potential
implications of  global  atmospheric  changes,  the  United Nations  Environment
Programme (UNEP)  and the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency  (EPA)  sponsored
an  International  Conference  on the Health and Environmental Effects of  Ozone
Modification and Climate  Change  during  the week of  June  16-20,  1986.    The
conference brought  together  over  three hundred  researchers  and policy makers
from  approximately  twenty nations.   This  four-volume  report  presents  the
seventy-three  papers  that were  delivered at the  conference  by  over eighty
speakers,  including  two  U.S.  Senators, top officials  from  UNEP and  EPA, some
of  the  leading  scientists   investigating  the  implications  of  atmospheric
change, and representatives from  industry and environmental  groups.  Volume 1
presents a  series of overview papers describing  each of the major areas of
research on the effects of atmospheric change,  as well as  policy  assessments
of  these   issues  by  well-known  leaders   in  government,   industry,  and  the
environmental  community.  Volumes  2,  3,  and 1 present the more  specialized
papers on  the  impacts of ozone  modification,  climate change, and  sea  level
rise, respectively,  and provide  some  of  the  latest research  in these areas.
This paper summarizes  the  entire four-volume report.

-------
OZONE MODIFICATION

Atmospheric Processes

     The ozone  in  the  upper part  of the   atmosphere—known as  the strato-
sphere— is  created  by  ultraviolet  radiation.    Oxygen  (02)  is  continuously
converted  to  ozone  (Oo)  and back  to 62 by  numerous  photochemical reactions
that  take   place  in  the  stratosphere,   as   Stordal  and  Isaksen   (Volume  1)
describe.   Chlorofluorocarbons and  other gases released  by  human activities
could  alter  the  current  balance  of  creative  and  destructive  processes.
Because CFCs  are  very  stable compounds, they  do not  break up in the lower
atmosphere  (known as  the troposphere).   Instead, they  slowly  migrate to the
stratosphere,   where  ultraviolet  radiation  breaks   them  down,  releasing
chlorine.

     Chlorine acts as a  catalyst  to  destroy  ozone;  it promotes reactions that
destroy ozone without being  consumed.  A chlorine (Cl) atom reacts with ozone
(Oq) to  form  CIO  and 02.   The CIO  later reacts with another 0^  to  form two
molecules  of  02,  which  releases  the  chlorine atom.   Thus,  two molecules  of
ozone are converted  to three molecules of ordinary oxygen, and the chlorine is
once again  free to start the process.   A  single  chlorine  atom  can destroy
thousands  of  ozone  molecules.    Eventually,  it  returns to  the  troposphere,
where it is rained out as hydrochloric acid.

     Stordal and Isaksen  point out  that  CFCs are not the only gas released by
human   activities   that   might   alter   the  ozone   balance.     Increasing
concentrations of methane in the  troposphere increase the  water  vapor in the
stratosphere,  which helps create  ozone.   Carbon  dioxide and other greenhouse
gases  (discussed  below)  warm   the   earth's  surface  but  cool   the  upper
atmosphere; cooler stratospheric temperatures slow the process of ozone deple-
tion.  Nitrous oxide (^0) reacts with both chlorine and ozone.

     Stordal  and  Isakson  present results  of possible  ozone depletion  over
time, using their  two-dimensional  atmospheric-chemistry model.   Unlike  one-
dimensional models which  provide  changes in  ozone in the global average,  this
model calculates  changes for  specific  latitutdes and  seasons.    The results
show that if concentrations of the relevant trace gases grow at recent levels,
global  average  ozone  depletion  by  2030 would  be  6.5  percent.    However,
countries in the higher latitudes (60°N)  would experience 16 percent depletion
during  spring.   Even  in  the case  of  constant  CFC  emissions, where global
average depletion would  be  2 percent by 2030,  average depletion  would  be  8
percent in the high  northern latitudes.

     Watson (Volume  1) presents evidence that ozone has been changing recently
more than atmospheric models  had  predicted.   As  Plate 1  shows, the ozone over
Antarctica  during   the  month  of  October  appears  to  have  declined   over  40
percent in  the  last six  to  eight years.  Watson also discusses  observations
from ozone monitors  that suggest a 2 to  3 percent worldwide reduction in ozone
in the upper portion of the stratosphere (thirty to forty kilometers above the
surface),  which is  consistent with  model predictions.  Finally,  he  presents
preliminary data  showing a  small decrease  since  1978  in  the  total  (column)
ozone worldwide.  However,  he strongly  emphasizes that  the data  have not yet
been fully reviewed and that it is  not  possible  to  conclusively attribute
observed ozone  depletion to  the  gases  released  by human  activities.   While

-------
there  are  several  hypotheses  to  explain  why  ozone  concentrations  have
declined,  none  have  been  adequately   established;   nor   did   any  of  the
atmospheric models predict the measured loss of ozone over Antarctica.

Ultraviolet Radiation

     Many  of  the  chemical  reactions  investigated  by  atmospheric  scientists
take  place only  in the  stratosphere  because  they  are caused  by  types  of
radiation  only  found  in  the  upper  atmosphere.    As  Frederick  (Volume  1)
explains, the sun  emits radiation  over a  broad  range of wavelengths, to which
the human eye responds in the  region from approximately 400 to 700 nanometers
(nm).  Wavelengths from 320  to 400 nm are known as UV-A; wavelengths from 280
to 320  nm are called UV-B,  and wavelengths  from  200 to 280 nm  are known as
UV-C.

     Frederick explains why  attention has primarily  focused on  the UV-B part
of the  spectrum.   The  atmosphere absorbs  virtually  all UV-C,  and is expected
to continue to do  so under all foreseeable circumstances.  On the other hand,
UV-A  is  not absorbed  by  ozone. .   By  contrast,  UV-B is partially absorbed by
ozone, and future depletion would reduce the effectiveness of this shield.

     We  now  examine  the  potential  implications  of  such  changes  on  human
health, plants, aquatic organisms, materials, and air pollution.

Effects on Human Health

     The  evidence  suggests  that   solar  ultraviolet  radiation   induces  skin
cancer,  cataracts,  suppression of the  human  immune  response  system,  and
(indirectly  through  immunosuppression)  the development of  some  cutaneous
infections, such as herpes.  Emmett (Volume 1)  discusses the absorption of UV
radiation  by  human tissue and  the mechanisms by which  damage and  repair may
occur.

     Emmett also  examines UV radiation as  the  cause of aging  of the skin and
both  basal  and  squamous  skin cancers.  In reviewing the role  of UV radiation
in  melanoma  (the  most frequently  fatal  skin  cancer),  he  states  that  some
evidence  suggests  this link, but  that currently there is no acceptable animal
model that can be used to explore or validate this relationship.   He concludes
that  future  studies  must focus  on  three major  factors—exposure  to  solar
radiation,  individual  susceptibility,  and  personal  behavior.  Waxier (Volume
1) presents evidence of a link between UV-B exposure and cataracts.

     Volume 2  presents  specific research results and  provides more detail on
many  of the aspects covered  in this volume.   Scotto presents epidemiological
evidence  linking solar radiation with  skin cancers,  other than melanoma.  His
analysis  suggests  that Caucasians  in the United States have a 12  to 30 percent
chance  of developing these cancers within their lifetimes,  even  without ozone
depletion.   Armstrong examines the role  of UV-B exposure  to melanoma  in a
study  of  511  matched  melanoma  patients  and   control  subjects  in  Western
Australia.   He  shows  that  "intermittent exposure"  to sunlight was closely
associated with this type of cancer.
  However, 02 and ^ reflect some UV-A back to space.

-------
     In a paper examining nonmelanoma skin cancer in Kuwait, Kollias and Baqer
(Volume  2)  show  that despite  the  presence  of  protective pigmentation,  75
percent of cancers occur on the 10 percent of the skin exposed to sunlight.  A
second paper on skin cancer presents experimental evidence suggesting that the
mechanism  by  which  skin  cancer   could  occur   involves  disruption  of  the
cytoskeleton  from  exposure  to UV-A  and  UV-B  light  (Zamansky  and  Chow,
Volume 2).

     The  pathways  by which  suppression  of  the  immune  response  might  be
triggered are  explored  in  papers  by  DeFabo  and Noonan,  Daynes et  al.,  and
Elmets  et  al  (all  Volume 2).   Davies and Forbes  (Volume 2) show  that mice
exposed to UV-B radiation had a decrease  in  lifetime that was proportional to
the quantity of  radiation and  not  directly  related to the  incidence of skin
cancer.

     Possible  implications   of  immune   suppression  of  diseases   and  the
mechanisms by which it occurs are still uncertain.  However,  several papers in
Volume 2 suggest that in addition to skin cancer and contact hypersensitivity,
diseases influenced  by  UV-B induced immune suppression  include  leishmaniasis
and herpes  infections.   Fisher  et.  al  (Volume 2)  show that  at  least  one
sunscreen effectively  protects  mice exposed  to UV-B radiation  from sunburn;
but it  does  not stop the  immune suppression from  interfering with  a contact
hypersensitivity (allergic) reaction.

Effects on Plants

     The effects of increased exposure to UV-B  radiation  on  plants has been a
primary  area  of research  for  nearly a decade.   Teramura (Volume  1) reports
that of the two hundred plants tested for their sensitivity to UV-B radiation,
over two-thirds  reacted  adversely;  peas,  beans,  squash,  melons,  and cabbage
appear  to  be  the  most  sensitive.   Given  the complexities  in  this  area of
research, he warns  that  these  results may  be misleading.   For  example, most
experiments have  used growth chambers.   Studies of plants  in the  field have
shown them to be less sensitive to UV-B.   Moreover,  different cultivars of the
same  plant  have  shown  very   different  degrees   of   sensitivity   to  UV-B
radiation.    Finally,  Teramura  suggests  that  potential effects  from multiple
stresses (e.g., UV-B  exposure  plus water stress  or  mineral  deficiency)  could
substantially alter a plant's response to changes in UV-B alone.

     In  Volume 2, Teramura  draws  extensively  from the  results of  his five
years of field tests  on  soybeans.    His data  show that a  25  percent depletion
in ozone could result in a  20  to  25  percent reduction in  soybean  yield and
adverse impacts on the quality  of  that yield.   Because  soybeans  are the fifth
largest  crop  in  the  world,  a  reduction  in  yields  could  have  serious
consequences for world food supplies.  However,  some soybean cultivars appear
to be  less  susceptible  to UV-B radiation, which  suggests  that selective crop
breeding might reduce future  losses, if  it does not increase vulnerability to
other environmental stresses.

     Bjorn (Volume  2)  examines the  mechanisms  by which plant damage occurs.
His research relates  specific wavelengths with those aspects  of plant growth
that might be  susceptible,  including the destruction of chloroplast,  DNAt or
enzymes necessary for photosynthesis.

-------
Aquatic Organisms

     Aquatic plants would also  be  adversely affected by increased ultraviolet
radiation.  Worrest (Volume 1) points out that most of these plants, which are
drifters  (phytoplankton),  spend much  of their time  near the surface  of the
water   (the   euphotic  zone)   and  are  therefore  exposed   to  ultraviolet
radiation.   A reduction  in  their productivities  would be  important  because
these plants  directly and  indirectly  provide  the  food for almost  all fish.
Furthermore,  the  larvae  of  many  fish found  in  the euphotic  zone would  be
directly affected, including crabs, shrimp, and anchovies.  Worrest points out
that fish account for  18  percent of  the animal protein  that people around the
world consume, and 40 percent of the protein consumed in Asia.

     An  important  question  is  the extent  to which current UV-B levels are a
constraint on aquatic  organisms.   Calkins  and  Blakefield  (Volume 2) conclude
that some  species are already  exposed to  as much UV-B as  they  can tolerate.
Thomson  (Volume  2)  shows that  a  10 percent decrease in  ozone could increase
the number of abnormal larvae as much as 18 percent.  In a study of anchovies,
a 20 percent  increase in UV-B  radiation over  a 15-day  period  caused the loss
of all the larvae within a 10-meter mixed layer in April and August.

     Many other factors could affect the magnitude of the impacts on specific
species,  ecosystems,  and  the   food  chain.   An important mechanism  by which
species could adapt to higher UV-B incidence would be to reduce  their exposure
by moving  further away from  the  water's surface during  certain times  of the
day or  year  when exposure is greatest.  Haeder (Volume 2) suggests, however,
that for certain species such avoidance may be  impaired by UV-B  radiation.

     Even  for those  organisms  that could move  to avoid  exposure,  unwanted
consequences may result.  Calkins and Blakefield present model results showing
that movement by  phytoplankton  away from  sunlight  to reduce exposure to a 10
percent  increase  in  UV-B would   result in a  2.5 to  5  percent  decrease  in
exposure  to  the  photosynthetically active radiation  on which  their  growth
depends.   Increased  movement  requires  additional energy  consumption,  while
changes  in location may affect  the availability of food for zooplankton, which
could cause other changes in shifts in the  aquatic food chain.

     To  a  certain extent, losses  within a particular species  of plankton'may
be compensated by gains in other species.   Although it is possible that no net
change  in  productivity will occur, questions  arise concerning the ecological
impacts  on  species diversity  and community  composition  (Kelly,  Volume  1).
Reductions  in diversity may make  populations  more susceptible  to changes in
water temperatures, nutrient availability,  diseases, or pollution.  Changes in
community  composition  could alter  the  protein  content,  dry weight, or overall
food value of the  initial stages of the aquatic food chain.

Polymer  Degradation and Urban Smog

     Current  sunlight  can cause paints to  fade, transparent window glazing to
yellow,  and  polymer  automobile roofs  to   become  chalky.   These changes are
likely  to occur more  in  places closer to  the  equator where UV-B radiation is
greater.    They  are  all  examples of degradation  that  could  accelerate  if
depletion  of the ozone layer occurs.   Andrady and Horst (Volume 2) present a
case  study of  the potential magnitude  of loss due to  increased exposure to

-------
UV-B radiation on polyvinyl  chloride  (PVC).   This chemical is used in outdoor
applications  where  exposure  to  solar  radiation  occurs over  a  prolonged
period.   It is also  used in  the  construction  industry in siding  and window
frames and as a roofing membrane.

     To analyze  the potential  economic impact of future ozone  depletion on
PVC, the  authors assumed  that the future service life of polymers  would be
maintained by increasing  the quantity of light  stabilizers (titanuim dioxide)
used in the product.    As  a  result, the costs  associated  with increased UV-B
radiation  would  be  roughly  equal  to  the   costs  of  increased  stablizers.
Preliminary  results  show that for  a  26  percent  depletion by  2075,  the
undiscounted costs would be $4.7 billion (1984 dollars).

     Increased penetration of UV-B radiation to the earth's surface could play
an  important  role  in  the formation  of ground level  oxidants (smog).   UV-B
affects smog  formation  through the  photolysis  of  formaldehyde,  from  which
radicals  are  the  main  source  for deriving  chain  reactions that  generate
photochemical smog.   Whitten  and  Gery  (Volume  2)  analyze  the  relationship
between UV-B,  smog, and warmer temperatures.  The results of this preliminary
study of  Nashville, Philadelphia,  and Los Angeles show that  large depletions
in stratospheric ozone and increases  in  temperature  would  increase smog by as
much as 50  percent.   In addition,  because oxidants  would  form earlier in the
day  and   closer  to population centers  (where  emissions  occur),  risks  from
exposure  could  increase by an  even higher percentage  increase.   Whitten and
Gery also report a  sensitive  relationship  between UV-B  and hydrogen peroxide,
an oxidant and precursor to acid rain.

CLIMATE CHANGE

The Greenhouse Effect

     Concern about a possible global warming  focuses largely on the same gases
that may  modify  the stratospheric  ozone:  carbon  dioxide, methane, CFCs,  and
nitrous oxide.  The report of a recent  conference convened by UNEP, the World
Meteorological  Organization,  and   the   International  Council  of  Scientific
Unions  concluded  that  if current trends  in  the emissions  of  these  gases
continue,  the  earth  could  warm a  few  degrees  (C)  in the next  fifty  years
(Villach  1985).   In the next  century,  the planet could warm as  much  as five
degrees (MAS  1983),  which would leave  the planet warmer   than at any  time in
the last two million years.

     A planet's temperature  is  determined primarily  by  the amount of  sunlight
it receives, the  amount of sunlight it  reflects,  and the  extent  to which the
atmosphere  retains  heat.    When sunlight  strikes  the  earth,  it  warms  the
surface, which then reradiates the heat as infrared radiation.  However,  water
vapor,  COp,  and other gases in the atmosphere absorb some  of the energy rather
than allowing it to pass undeterred through  the atmosphere to space.   Because
the atmosphere traps  heat  and warms the earth  in a  manner somewhat analogous
to the glass panels of  a  greenhouse,  this  phenomenon is commonly  known as the
"greenhouse effect."  Without  the  greenhouse  effect of the gases  that  occur
naturally in the atmosphere,  the earth would  be  approximately  33°C colder than
it is currently (Hansen et al. 1984).

-------
     In  recent decades,  the  concentrations of  greenhouse  gases have  been
increasing.  Since the beginning of  the  industrial  revolution,  the combustion
of  fossil  fuels,  deforestation,  and  a  few other  activities  have  released
enough C02  to  raise  atmospheric concentrations by  20  percent;  concentrations
have risen  8 percent  since 1958 (Keeling,  Bacastow,  and Whorf  1982).   More
recently, Ramanathan  et  al. (1985)  examined the  greenhouse gases  other  than
C02 (such as methane, CFCs, and nitrous oxide),  and concluded that these other
gases  are  likely  to  double the  warming  caused  by C02  alone.    Using  these
results, the Villach Conference estimated  that  an  "effective doubling" of C02
is likely by 2030.2

     Hansen et  al.  (Volume  1)  and  Manabe & Wetherald  (Volume  1)  present the
results  that their climate models predict for  an  effective  doubling  of  C02.
Both models  consider a  number of "climatic feedbacks" that could alter the
warming that would directly  result from  C02 and other  gases released  by human
activities.  Warmer  temperatures  would  allow  the  atmosphere to  retain  more
water  vapor, which is also a  greenhouse gas, thereby  resulting in additional
warming.   Ice  and  snow  cover would  retreat,  causing sunlight  that  is now
reflected by these bright  surfaces to  be absorbed  instead,  causing additional
warming.  Finally, a  change in cloud cover might result,  which could  increase
or  decrease  the  projected  warming.    Although  the  two models differ  in  many
ways,  both conclude  that  an effective  doubling  of  greenhouse gases would warm
the earth's surface between two and four degrees (C).

     Hansen et  al. project  the doubling  to occur  between  2020 and 2060.  They
also   provide   estimates  of   the  implications  of  temperature  changes  for
Washington,  D.C., and  seven  other  U.S.   cities for the middle  of  the  next
century.   For   example,  Washington  would have  12  and  85  days per year above
38°C (100°F) and  32°C  (90°F),  respectively, compared with 1 and 35 days above
those  levels today.  While evenings  in which the thermometer fails to go below
278C  (80°F)  occur less  than once  per year today  in that  city,  they project
that such  evenings would occur  19 times  per year.   (See  Plates  2 and 3 for
worldwide maps  of historical and projected  temperature changes.)

Water  Resources

     Manabe  and  Wetherald  (Volume   1)  focus  on  the potential  changes  in
precipitation  patterns  that might result  from  the  greenhouse warming.   They
project  substantial  increases  in summer dryness at  the middle  latitudes that
currently  support most  of the  world's agriculture.   Their model also projects
increased  rainfall for late  winter.

     Beran  (Volume  1)  reviews the  literature  on  the  hydrological and water
resource  impacts of  climate  change.   He expresses some  surprise  that  only
twenty-one  papers could be found  that address  future  water resource   impacts.
One of  the  problems,  he  notes,  is  that there is  a   better  scientific
understanding  of how  global average temperatures and  rainfall  might change,
than  for the changes that  specific  regions may experience.  Nevertheless, he
    Studies  on the greenhouse effect generally discuss the impacts of a carbon
    dioxide  doubling.   By "effective doubling"  we  refer to any combination of
    increases  in  concentrations  of  the  various gases  that  causes  a warming
    equal  to the warming  of  a doubling of  carbon dioxide alone.

-------
demonstrates  that  useful  information  can  be  extracted  by  studying  the
implications of particular scenarios.

     Nicholson (Volume  3)  shows how historical changes  in water availability
have caused  problems  for society  in the past.   The best  lesson  of climatic
history,  she writes,  "is  that agricultural  and  economic  systems must  be
flexible enough to adapt to changing conditions and,  in the face of potential
water  scarcity,   systems  must  be  designed  that  require  minimum  use  of
resources."  Wilhite (Volume 3) examines drought policies in Australia and the
United  States,  concluding  that  the  lack  of  national  drought plans  could
substantially impair the ability of these two nations to successfully adapt to
hydrologic changes resulting from the greenhouse warming.

     Cohen  (Volume 3)  examines  the  potential  implications  of  the  global
warming  for  water levels  in  the  Great  Lakes that  separate Canada  from the
United States.  Using results  from the models of both Hansen et al. and Manabe
& Wetherald,  he  concludes that lake levels could drop  10  to 30 centimeters.
This drop would significantly reduce the  capacity of ocean-going vessels that
enter the Great Lakes.   On the other  hand,  such  a drop might  be  viewed as a
benefit by the owners of critically eroding property whose homes are currently
threatened by historically high lake levels.  Street-Perrott et al. (Volume 3)
discuss  the  historic  impacts  of changes in climate on  the levels  of lakes in
North America, South America,  Australia,  and Africa.

     Gleick  (Volume  3) uses  scenarios from  the  Hansen et  al. and  Manabe  &
Wetherald models  (as well  as a third developed  by  the National Center for
Atmospheric  Research) to drive  a  water-balance model of  the Sacramento Basin
in California.  He finds that  reductions  in runoff could occur even in months
where precipitation increases  substantially, because of the increased rates of
evaporation  that  take  place at higher temperatures.  He  also points out that
the models predict that changes in  monthly runoff patterns  will  be far more
dramatic than changes  in annual averages.   For seven of  ten scenarios, soil
moisture would be reduced every month  of  the  year;  for  the other three cases,
slight increases  in moisture are projected  for winter months.  Mather (Volume
3)  conducts  a  detailed  analysis  for southern  Texas   and  northern  Mexico;
examines in  less  detail  twelve regions around the  world;  and projects shifts
in global vegetation zones.

Agriculture and Forestry

     The  greenhouse  warming   could  affect  agriculture  by  altering  water
availability,  length  of  growing  season,   and  the  number  of  extremely  hot
days.    Increased COp  concentrations  could  also have   two  direct  impacts
unrelated to climate change:  At least the laboratory,  plants grow faster (the
COp fertilization effect) and  retain moisture more efficiently.   The extent to
which  these  beneficial  effects offset  the  impacts  of  climate change will
depend on  the  extent  to which global  warming  is  caused by  C02  as  opposed to
other greenhouse gases, which  do not have these positive impacts.

     Parry (Volume 1)  provides an overview of the  potential impacts of climate
change on  agriculture and  forestry.   He  points  out that  commercial farmers
plan according to  the average year,  while  family  and subsistence farmers must
ensure  that  even  in  the worst  years they  can  make  ends  meet.    Thus,  the
commercial farmer would be concerned about the impact of future climate change


                                       8

-------
on average conditions and average yields, while farmers at the margin would be
most  concerned  with  changes  in  the  probability  of  (for  example)  a  severe
drought that causes  complete crop failure.  Parry  notes  that the probability
of  two or  more  anomalous  years  in  a row  could create  disproportionately
greater problems  for agriculture.   For example,  a persistent  drought  in the
U.S. Great Plains from  1932  to 1937  contributed  to about two hundred thousand
farm bankruptcies.

     Parry discusses  a  number of historical  changes in  climate.   The Little
Ice  Age  in western  Europe  (1500-1800 A.D.)  resulted  in the  abandonment of
about half the  farms in Norway, an  end to cultivation  of cereals in Iceland,
and some farmland in Scotland being permanently covered with snow.  Concerning
the late medieval cooling (1250-1500) he writes:   "The failure to adapt to the
changing circumstances  is believed to  explain  much of the Norse decline.  The
Norse continued to emphasize stock-raising in  the  face of reduced capacity of
the already limited  pastures.  The option of  exploiting  the rich seas around
them, as the Inuit  (Eskimos) successfully  did, was not taken up  ... This is
an  extreme  example  of  how   governments can   fail  to identify  and   implement
appropriate policies  of response."   It also suggests that effective  responses
can reduce damages from climate change.

     The paper  reviews  a  number of studies  that project  impacts  of climate
change on agriculture.   "Warming appears  to be  detrimental to cereals in the
core  wheat-growing  areas of North  America and  Europe." If no precipitation
changes take place,  a one-degree warming would decrease yields  1 to  9 percent
while  a  two-degree  (C)  warming would  decrease yields 3 to  17 percent.  Parry
also discusses how particular crop zones might shift.  A  doubling of  C02 would
substantially  expand the wheat-growing area  in Canada due  to  higher winter
temperatures and  increased rainfall.   In Mexico,  however, temperature stresses
would  increase, thereby  reducing yields.

     A  number  of studies  have been conducted using the models  of Hansen et
al.,  Manabe  &  Wetherald,  and others.   Although  these  projections  cannot be
viewed as reliable forecasts,  they do  provide  consistent  scenarios that can be
useful  for  examining vulnerability  to climate change.   Parry indicates  that
investigations  of Canada,  Finland,  and the northern USSR  using the model by
Hansen et al.  show  reduced yields of spring-sown crops such as  wheat, barley,
and  oats,   due to   increased  moisture  stress early  in  the  growing period.
However,  switching   to  winter wheat or winter rye might reduce this stress.
Parry  goes  on  to outline numerous  measures  by  which  farmers  might adapt to
projected climate change.

     Waggoner  (Volume 3) points out that  the  global warming would not affect
plants uniformly.    Some  are more  drought-resistant  than  others,  and  some
respond  to higher C02 concentrations more  vigorously than others.   Co plants,
such as wheat, respond to  increased  COo  more than Cjj plants  such  as maize.
Thus,  the COp  fertilization  effect  woulcf not help the farmer growing C^ crops
accompanied by  Co weeds.  Waggoner also examines the impact of  future climate
change on average  crop- yields  and  pests, and  the  probability of  successive
drought  years.    He  concludes that although projections of  future changes are
useful,  historical  evidence  suggests that  surprises may be  in store, and  that
"agricultural  scientists will be expected to  aid  rather than watch  mankind's
adaptation to an  inexorable  increase in COj and  its greenhouse  effect."

-------
     The  impact  of future  climate  change  on  yields  for  spring  wheat   in
Saskatchewan,  Canada,  is  the subject  of  the  paper  by  Stewart  (Volume 3).
Using the output  from  the  Hansen  et  al.  model (Volume 1), which projects that
the  effective  doubling   of  carbon   dioxide  would   increase  average  annual
temperatures  in  that region  by  4.7°C,  he  estimates that  the  growing season
would start  two  or  three  weeks  earlier  and  end  three  or  four  weeks later.
Although average  precipitation during the  growing season  would  increase,   he
also finds  that  the area would become more prone to drought.   The impact  of
climatic change would be to reduce yields 16 to 26 percent.  Stewart estimates
that the fertilization effect  of a CC^ doubling  would reduce  the losses to 6
to  15 percent.    Cooter  (Volume  3)  examines the economic  impact  of projected
climate change  on the economy of Oklahoma,  concluding  that the  Gross State
Product would decline  75 to 300 million dollars.   (The  state's gross product
in  1985 was approximately 50 billion dollars.)

     Fritts  (Volume  3)  examines  tree  rings  to  assess  how past  changes   in
climate have  affected  forests, and  concludes  that tree  rings  are useful for
estimating past changes  in  climate.   Solomon and  West (Volume  3) discuss the
results of their  efforts to model the future  impacts.  Considering the impact
of climate change caused  by doubled  C02  without the fertilization effect, they
find that  "biomass  (for  boreal forests)  declines for 50-75 years as warming
kills off large boreal forest  species, before new northern hardwoods can grow
into the plot."

     "Warming at  the  transition  site causes  an  almost immediate  response   in
declining biomass from dieback of mature  trees,  and in decline of tree mass as
large trees  die  and are  temporarily replaced  by small  young  trees,"  they
write.   "The  deciduous forest site  . .  .  results in permanent loss  of dense
forest.    One  might expect  the   eventual  appearance  of  subtropical  forests
similar to  those in Florida  today,  but the  real difficulty is  the  moisture
balance (which  is)  more  similar  to  those  of treeless Texas  today,  than  to
those  of  southern   Florida."    Solomon  and  West  go on  to  show  how  the
fertilization effect  from  increased  concentrations  of C02  could  offset  part
but not all of the drop in forest productivity.

Sea Level Rise

     One of the most widely recognized consequences of a  global warming would
be  a rise  in  sea level.    As  Titus  (Volume  1) notes, global temperatures and
sea level  have  fluctuated over  periods  of one  hundred  thousand  years,  with
temperatures during  ice  ages  being  three  to  five degrees  (C)  lower  and sea
level over  one  hundred  meters   lower  than  today.    By  contrast,   the  last
interglacial period  (one hundred  thousand years  ago) was one or  two degrees
warmer  than today, and sea level  was  five  to seven meters  higher.

     The projected global warming could  raise  sea level by heating and thereby
expanding  ocean   water,  melting  mountain  glaciers,  and  by  causing  polar
glaciers  in  Greenland and Antarctica  to melt  and   possibly  slide  into  the
oceans.     Thomas  (Volume  4)   presents   new   calculations  of  the  possible
contribution of Antarctica and combines  them  with previous  estimates  for the
other sources,  projecting  that a worldwide rise  in  sea level  of 90  to 170
centimeters by the  year  2100  with  110  centimeters most  likely.   However,  he
also estimates that  if the global warming is substantially  delayed,  the rise
in  sea  level  could  be  cut in half.   Such a delay  might result  either  from


                                      10

-------
actions to  curtail  emissions or  from  the thermal lag  induced  by the oceans'
ability to absorb heat.

     On  the other  hand,  Thomas  also  estimates  that  if a  warming  of four
degrees  results  from a  C02  doubling  (which the  model  of  Hahsen et  al.
projects) and concentrations continue to grow after 2050, the rise could be as
great as  2.3 meters.   He also notes that  an irreversible deglaciation of the
West Antarctic  Ice  Sheet might begin  in the next century,  which would raise
sea level another six meters in the following centuries.

     Titus  (Volume  1) notes  that  these  projections  imply that sea level could
rise 30 centimeters by 2025,  in addition to  local subsidence trends that have
been important  in Taipei, Taiwan; Venice,  Italy; the  Nile  Delta,  Egypt;  and
most of the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts of the United States.  The projected rise
in  sea level  would  inundate  low-lying  areas,   destroy  coastal marshes  and
swamps,  erode  shorelines,   exacerbate   coastal   flooding,  and   increase  the
salinity of rivers,  bays, and aquifers.

     Bruun  (Volume  4) argues that with a combination  of coastal engineering
and  sound  planning,  society can  meet  the  challenge  of a  rising  sea.   He
discusses  a number  of   engineering  options,  including  dikes  (levees)  and
seawalls, and  adding sand  to recreational  beaches  that are eroding,  with a
section on  the battle that  the  Dutch have  fought  with  the  sea  for over one
thousand  years.   Goemans (Volume 4)  describes  the  current approach  of the
Dutch  for defending  the  shoreline,  and estimates that the cost  of raising
their  dikes for a one meter  rise  in sea level would be 10  billion guilders,
which  is  less  than  0.05 percent of  their  Gross National Product for a single
year.

     Goemans concludes that there is no need to anticipate such a rise because
they could  keep up with  it.   However,  he is more concerned  by the two-meter
scenario: "Almost immediately after  detection, actions  would be required.   It
is  not  at all  certain that decision-makers  act that  fast.  .  .  .   The present
flood  protection  strategy came  about only after  the  tragic  disaster of 1953.
When nobody can  remember  a specific disaster,   it is  extremely  difficult to
obtain  consensus  on countermeasures."   For  his own  country,  Goemans sees one
positive  impact:    Referring to  the unique  experience  of  Dutch engineering
firms  in  the battle with  the sea,  he suggests that "a rising sea may provide a
new global market for this expertise."  But  he predicts  that "the question of
compensation payments may come up," for the  poorer countries who did not cause
climate change but must face its consequences.

     Broadus et al.   (Volume 4) examine  two such countries  in  detail:  Egypt
and Bangladesh.  The  inhabited areas of both countries are river deltas, where
low-lying land has been created by the sediment washing down major rivers.  In
the  case  of Egypt,"  the damming of the  Nile  has  interrupted  the sediment, and
as  the delta sinks,  land is lost to the  Mediterranean  Sea.   Broadus et al.
estimate  that  a  50-centimeter  rise  in  global  sea level, when combined with
subsidence  and the loss of  sediment, would  result in the loss  of  0.3 to 0.4
percent  of  the  nation's  land  area; a 200-centimeter  rise  would  flood  0.7
percent.  However, because Egypt's population is  concentrated in the low-lying
areas,  16 and 21 percent of the nation's population currently reside in the
areas  that  would be lost  in  the two scenarios.
                                       11

-------
     The situation would be even more severe in Bangladesh.  As Plate 4 shows,
this nation, which is already overcrowded,  would  lose 12 to 28 percent of its
total  area,  which  currently  houses  9  to  27  percent  of  its  population.
Moreover, floods could penetrate farther  inland,  which  could  leave the nation
more vulnerable  to the  type of  tropical  storm that  killed 300,000 people in
the early 1970s, especially if the frequency of tropical storms doubled due to
warmer water temperatures, which deSylva  (Volume  4)  projects.   Broadus et al.
conclude that  the vulnerability  of Bangladesh to  a rise  in sea  level  will
depend in large measure  on whether future water projects disrupt land-creating
sediment washing down the Ganges.

     Bird (Volume  4) examines the  implications  of  sea level rise  for other
African and Asian  nations,  as  well as Australia.  While holding  back the sea
may be viable in Australia, he shows  areas  in New Guinea where people live in
small cottages on  the water's  edge on a  barrier  island that  almost certainly
would be unable to  justify  construction of  a dike.   He also points  to the
Philippines, where many people have literally  "taken to the water," living in
small boats and maintaining fishing nets  in their own plots of bay instead of
land.  Current wetlands, he suggests, may convert to these shallow bays,  with
people converting to a more water-based economy.

     Leatherman  (Volume  4)  examines  the  implications  of  sea level  rise for
South  America.    He  notes  that  such popular resorts  as Copacabana  Beach,
Brazil; Punta  del  Este, Uruguay;  and Mar  del Plata,  Argentina,  are already
suffering  serious   erosion.    He   concludes   that   because  of  the  economic
importance   of  resorts,  governments  will  allocate  the  necessary   funds  to
maintain their  viability.   However, he  predicts  that  "coastal wetlands  will
receive benign neglect"  and be lost.

     Park et al. (Volume 4)  focus on the expected  drowning of  coastal wetlands
in the United States.   Using a computer  model  of over  50  sites,  they project
that 40-75  percent of existing U.S.  coastal wetlands could be lost  by 2100.
Although these losses could  be  reduced to  20-55  percent if new wetlands  form
inland as   sea  level rises,  the  necessary  wetland creation  would  require
existing developed  areas  to  be  vacated  as  sea  level  rises,  even  though
property owners  would  frequently   prefer  to  construct  bulkheads to protect
their property.   Because coastal wetlands are  important for many  commerically
important seafood  species,  as  well as  birds and  furbearing animals,  Park et
al. conclude that even a one-meter  rise  in  sea level would have major impacts
on the coastal environment.

     DeSylva  (Volume  4)  also examines  the  environmental  implications  of sea
level  rise,  noting  that in  addition to wetlands  being  flooded,  estuarine
salinity would increase.   Because 66 to 90 percent of U.S.  fisheries depend on
estuaries,  he writes that these  impacts could  be  important.   He also suggests
that coral  reefs could become vulnerable  because  of  sea level rise,  increased
temperatures,  and the decrease in the pH (increased acidity) of the ocean.

     Kuo (Volume 4)  examines  the implications of sea level rise  for flooding
in  Taipei,  Taiwan,  and  coastal drainage  in  general.    Although Taipei  is
upstream from the sea, Kuo concludes that projected sea level  rise would cause
serious problems,  especially  because Taiwan is also sinking.  He  recommends
that engineers around the world take "future sea level rise into consideration
... to avoid designing a system that may become  prematurely  obsolete."


                                      12

-------
     Gibbs (Volume 4) estimates  that  sea level rise could  result in economic
damages in Charleston, South  Carolina,  equal to as much as  25  percent of the
annual product of the community.   Anticipatory measures,  however, could reduce
these impacts by half.  Gibbs finds that in some areas  actions should be taken
today, in spite of the current uncertainty regarding future rates of sea level
rise, while for other areas it would  be more prudent  to  wait until uncertain-
ties are resolved.

     Ken Smith, a realtor from coastal  New  Jersey,  reacts  to the other papers
presented in Volume  4.   He argues that the  issue of sea level  rise should be
taken seriously today, but  laments the fact  that many of  his fellow realtors
make comments such as "What do you care?   You won't be around to see it!" and
the scientific  community  is  "a bunch of  eggheads who don't  want us (to build
on  the  coast)  anyway,"  Smith  suggests  that part of the resistance to taking
the  issue  seriously  is  that  there are a number of "naturalists"  who oppose
building near  the shore, and  "most of  the discussion seems  to  come from the
'naturalist1  camp."   Nevertheless, Smith  argues that  "the  solutions—if there
are  any—should be  contemplated  now as  part  of  a concerted  global effort.
This is a beautiful world, and we are its stewards."

Human Health and Ecological Impacts

     Climate and  weather have  important impacts on  human health.   A global
warming would  increase  the  stresses due  to  heat,  decrease those due to cold,
and possibly enable  some  disease  that require warm year-round temperatures to
survive  at  higher   latitudes.    Kalkstein  et  al.  (Volume   3)   present  a
preliminary  statistical  assessment of  the  relationship of mortality rates to
fluctuations  in temperature in New York  City.   They find that  a two to  four
degree  (C)  warming would substantially increase mortality  rates  in New  York
City,  if nothing  else changed.   However,  they caution that  if New  Yorkers are
able  to acclimatize  to  temperatures  as well as people who  currently live in
U.S.  cities  to the  south,  fewer  deaths would occur.  Kalkstein et al. write
that  knowledgeable  observers  disagree  about  whether  and how  rapidly people
adapt  to higher temperatures; some people undoubtedly adjust  more readily  than
others.

      Although people may  be able  to adapt to  changes in climate, other species
on  the planet would also be affected and may not  be  as  able to control their
habitats.  Peters and Darling (Volume 3) examine the possibility that changes
in  climate  would place  multiple  stresses on  some  species which would become
extinct,  resulting in a  significant  decline in biodiversity.   (Mass extinc-
tions  appear to have accompanied  rapid  changes  in temperatures  in the past.)

      Throughout the  world reserves have been set aside where targeted species
can remain  relatively free  of human intrusion.  Peters and  Darling ask:   Will
these reserves  continue  to  serve  the  same function  if the  climate changes? In
some cases,  it  will  depend  on  whether the reserve's boundaries  encompass areas
to  which  plants and  animals could  migrate.   Some species may  be able to
migrate "up  the mountain" to find cooler temperatures; coastal  wetlands could
migrate  inland.    A northerly   migration  of  terrestrial  species  would be
possible in  the undeveloped arctic regions of Alaska,  Canada,  and the Soviet
Union; but human development would block migration of larger animals in  many
areas.
                                       13

-------
POLICY RESPONSES

     Papers by UNEP  Deputy  Director Genady Golubev and  EPA Administrator Lee
Thomas (both in Volume  1) provide  official views on the nature of the effects
from projected changes in the atmosphere and the role of their institutions in
addressing those  changes.    Golubev notes  that  while "the  global  issues are
complex,  uncertainty  exceeds understanding, and patience  is prudence," there
is an other  side  to  the story:   "Our  legacy  to the  future  is an environment
less benign than that inherited from our forbearers.  The risks are sufficient
to generate  a collective  concern  that  forebodes  too  much  to  wait  out  the
quantifications of scientific research.   Advocating patience is an invitation
to be a spectator to our own destruction."

     Golubev also points out that UNEP has worked  for  the achievement of the
Vienna Convention for the Protection of the Ozone Layer, in which many nations
have agreed to act in concert to  address  an environmental issue whose impacts
have not yet been detected.   Yet he notes  that  the agreement is for coopera-
tion in research and does not yet bind nations to observe limits in production
and emissions of gases that  could deplete stratospheric ozone.

     Thomas points  out that both  the  potential depletion  of ozone  and  the
global warming from  the  greenhouse  effect   are   examples  of  environmental
problems  that involve the "global commons."  Because all nations contribute to
the problem and  experience  the consequences,  only  an international  agreement
is likely  to  be  effective.   He  urges  scientists around the  world  to discuss
this issue with their colleagues and key officials.

     Richard Benedick,  Deputy  Assistant Secretary  in the U.S.  Department of
State (Volume  1), describes  the emerging  international  process addressing the
ozone issue.   Although  the  process for addressing  climate  change  has not yet
proceeded as  far,  he writes,  "from my perspective as  a career diplomat,  it
appears that  the  greenhouse effect has all the markings  of  becoming  a high
visibility foreign policy issue. .  .  .  How we  address this issue internation-
ally depends to a great extent  on our success or failure  in dealing with the
ozone depletion issue."

     J.P.   Bruce   (Volume  1)  of  Environment   Canada  presents the  issue  of
atmospheric change in the context of air pollution  in  general.  He writes that
ozone modification and climate change are  "urgent  issues,"  especially because
important long-term  decisions  are  being  made today  whose  outcomes  could  be
strongly  affected by  changes in  climate and the ozone  layer.   Bruce recommends
that emissions of CFCs  be reduced,  and concludes that  "a new approach,  a new
ethic towards  discharging wastes  and chemical materials into the air  we  all
breathe must soon be  adopted on  a international scale."

     Two  U.S. Senators  also  provide their reactions.   John  Chafee  from Rhode
Island (Volume  1)  describes hearings  that his Subcommittee  on  Environmental
Pollution held  June   10-11,   1986.    "Why  are  policy  makers  demanding  action
before the scientists have  resolved all of the questions  and uncertainties?"
he asks.   "We  are  doing so because there  is a very  real  possibility that
society—through ignorance or indifference, or both—is  irreversibly altering
the ability of our atmosphere to perform basic life support  functions for the
planet."   Albert Gore, Jr. from  Tennessee,  who has  chaired three congressional
hearings  on the  greenhouse  effect, explains why  he has introduced a  bill in

-------
the U.S. Senate  to  establish  an International Year  of  the Greenhouse Effect.
"The  legislations  would  coordinate and  promote  domestic and  international
research efforts on  both the scientific  and policy aspects  of  this problem,
identify strategies to reduce the  increase of  carbon dioxide  and trace gases,
investigate  ways  to minimize   the impact  of  the  greenhouse  effect,  and
establish long-term  research  plans."  Senator Gore closes  by  quoting Sherwood
Rowland (discussed below): "What's  the use of  having developed a science well
enough to make  predictions,  if  in  the  end  all  we're  willing to do is stand
around and  wait for  them to come  true?"   Both Senators call  for  immediate
action to reduce global  use of CFCs.

     John S. Hoffman  (Volume  1) emphasizes  the  inertia  of the atmosphere and
oceans.   Because  there  are  time  lags  between changes  in   emission  rates,
atmospheric  concentrations,   and  changes   in   ozone  and   global  warming
temperatures, the types of management strategies must  be different  from those
that  are appropriate  for  controlling,   for  example,  particulate  pollution,
where  the  problem  goes  away as  soon  as emissions are halted.   CFC  emissions
would  have  to  be   cut  80  percent   simply   to  keep  concentrations  from
increasing.   Although constant  concentrations would prevent ozone  depletion
from worsening, Hoffman points  out  that even if  we hold the concentrations of
greenhouse  gases  constant once  the earth has warmed one degree,  the planet
would warm  another degree as  the oceans come into equilibrium.  Thus it might
be  impossible  to  prevent a  substantial   warming  if  we  wait until  a small
warming has taken place.3

     The final  section  of this volume presents  the  papers from the final day
of  the conference.    Peter Usher of UNEP  recounts the evolution  of  the ozone
issue.   Following  Rowland  and  Molina's  hypothesis  that  chlorofluorocarbons
could cause a depletion of stratospheric ozone in 197M, UNEP held a  conference
in  1977  that  led to a world  plan  of  action to  assess the issue and quantify
risks.   Since that  time,  UNEP has held  numerous coordinating meetings leading
up  the the  Vienna  Convention.   However, Usher suggests that motivating inter-
national effort on the greenhouse effect will  be more difficult:  "Prohibition
of  nonessential  emissions of   relatively   small  amounts  (to  control  ozone
depletion)  is one  thing,  limiting  emissions of  carbon  dioxide from coal- and
oil-burning is quite another."

     Dudek  and  Oppenheimer of  the Environmental Defense  Fund (U.S.) analyze
some  of  the  costs  and  benefits  of  controlling  emissions   of  CFCs.   They
estimate that by holding emissions  constant, 1.65 million-cases of nonmelanoma
skin cancers could be prevented  worldwide, and that  the cost  of these controls
would  be 196 to 455 million dollars, depending on the availability of alterna-
tive chemicals.

     Two  former  high-ranking  environmental  officials  in the  United States
argue  that we should be  doing  more to address  these  problems.   John Topping
recommends  that CFCs  in aerosol  spray cans,  egg  cartons, fast-food containers,
and other  nonessential  uses  be phased  out,  and  that  people recognize that
    Titus  (Volume 1) and  Thomas  (Volume U) also  explore inertia, noting  that
    even  if temperatures  remained  constant after warming  somewhat,  sea  level
    would  rise  at an accelerated  rate as  the oceans, mountain glaciers, and ice
    sheets came into equilibrium  with the new  temperature.
                                       15

-------
along with energy  conservation,  nuclear power is  the  most likely alternative
to  fossil  fuels over  the  nexc generation  or two.   He also  recommends that
society  take  steps to minimize  the impacts  of  climate change  and  sea level
rise, for  example, by requiring  environmental impact  statements  to consider
the likely impacts.

     Gus  Speth,  president  of  the  World  Resources  Institute,  recommends
international  efforts  to  stop  tropical deforestation;  a  production  cap  for
chlorofluorocarbons; increased energy  conservation;  advanced technologies for
producing  electricity  from  natural  gas;   and  tighter  regulations  to limit
carbon monoxide  from  automobiles,  which would indirectly limit increases in
atmospheric  methane.     He agrees  with  Topping  that  environmental  impact
statements for  projects  that  could contribute to  or  be  affected  by climate
change or ozone modification should consider these impacts.

     Doniger and  Wirth,  from  the  Natural  Resources Defense  Council (U.S.),
argue that  the  current  uncertainties  are no  longer  a  reason to  wait  for
additional information: "With the stakes so high,  uncertainty  is an even more
powerful argument for  taking early action."  These authors  conclude that sharp
reductions in  CFCs are  necessary,  pointing out  that  even with a production
cap,  atmospheric  concentrations  of  these  gases  will  continue  to  grow.
Therefore, Doniger and Wirth propose an 80  percent cut in  production over the
next  five years  for   CFCs 11 and  12,  the  halons,  and  perhaps some  other
compounds, with a complete  phaseout in the  next decade.

     Richard Barnett  of the  Alliance  for a  Responsible  CFC  Policy  (which
represents CFC  using  industries)  agrees that  we  should not delay  all action
until the  effects  of  ozone depletion  and climate  change are  felt;  but  he
"would hardly characterize the activities over the last twelve years as 'wait
and see1  . . .  The science,  as  we  currently  understand it,  however, tells us
that there  is  additional  time in which to solidify international  consensus.
This must be done  through  discussion and negotiation,  not through unilateral
regulation."

     Barnett adds   that  industry should  "take precautionary  measures  while
research  and  negotiations  continue  at the  international  level.    We  will
continue  to  examine  and  adopt   such  prudent   precautionary  measures   as
recapturing,  recycling,  and  recovery  techniques  to  control  CFC  emissions;
transition  to   existing  alternative  CFCs  that  are  considered to  be  more
environmentally  acceptable;  practices  to  replace  existing  systems at  the
expiration of  their useful lives to  equipment  using other  CFC  formulations;
practices in the field to  prevent emissions where possible; encouragement of
CFC users to look for  processes or substances  that are  as efficient,  safe,  and
productive—or  better—than what  is  presently  available."

     Barnett concludes  that "these environmental concerns  are serious,  but
their successful  resolution  will require  greater  global  cooperation  in con-
ducting the necessary  research and  monitoring, and in  developing coordinated,
effective, and  equitable  policy decisions  for  all  nations."

     We hope that this paper has  provided  the  reader with a "road map" through
the papers of this four-volume report on the potential  effects  of changing  the
atmosphere.   But  we have  barely  scratched the surface  of each, Just  as  the
existing  research  has  barely  scratched   the  surface  in  discovering  and


                                      16

-------
demonstrating the possible risks of ozone modification and  climate  change.   A
continual evolution of our  understanding  will be necessary for  our knowledge
to stay ahead of the global  experiment that  society is conducting.


REFERENCES

Hansen, J.E., A. Lacis,  D. Rind,  and G.  Russell.  1984.  Climate sensitivity to
     increasing greenhouse gases.   In Greenhouse  effect and  sea level rise;   A
     challenge  for  this  generation,  eds.  M.C.  Barth  and  J.G.  Titus.    Mew
     York:  Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Keeling,  C.D.,  R.B. Bacastow, and  T.P. Whorf.    1982.   Measurements of  the
     concentration  of carbon  dioxide at  Mauna Loa,  Hawaii.   Carbon  Dioxide
     Review  1982.  377-382,  ed.  by  W.  Clark.   New  York:   Oxford  University
     Press, Unpublished  data from NOAA after 1981.

NAS.  1983.  Changing Climate.  Washington,  D.C.:  National  Academy Press.

Nordhaus, W.D.,  and G.W. Yohe.   1983.   Future carbon dioxide emissions from
     fossil fuels.  In Changing Climate.  Washington, D.C.:  National Academy
     Press.

Villach.  1985.  International assessment of the  role of carbon dioxide and of
     other  greenhouse  gases  in climate  variations  and associated  impacts.
     Conference Statement.  Geneva:   United  Nations Environment Program.
                                       17

-------
Future Sea  Level Rise and Its Early
Detection by Satellite  Remote Sensing

Robert Thomas
Space Department
Royal Aircraft Establishment
Franborough, Hants UK
ABSTRACT

     During  the past 100 years,  sea level  appears  to have risen by 10-15 cm,
probably  due to the combined effects of thermal expansion  of ocean  surface
waters  and net melting of  glaciers  and  ice caps, associated with a  small
increase  in  global  temperatures.  This trend will almost certainly continue
and accelerate if  steadily  increasing levels  of  carbon dioxide  and  other
"greenhouse"  gases  in  the  atmosphere  cause  warming  of the  magnitude  widely
predicted  by climate modellers  (see Hansen et  al.  Volume  1).   Rising  air
temperatures  will  cause  increased  melting  from glaciers and  ice  caps,  and
rising  seawater temperatures will  cause  thermal  expansion of  the  oceans.
Moreover,  warmer  ocean waters could melt and  weaken  the many floating  ice
shelves  that  surround Antarctica,  permitting  increased ice  discharge  from
glaciers.   This paper estimates the total  sea  level  rise  that  could  occur
during the next century as a  result of these  factors.

     If,  as  predicted by  many climate models, global  temperatures increase by
an average of about 3°C,  there is  a good probability  that 'sea  level will rise
by approximately  1.m by  the  year 2100.  Ultimately,  such a  rise would become
very apparent to  coastal populations, but the  initial change would be  slow.
Consequently,  it  is  important to devise  an "early  warning system" for prompt
detection  of changes that will precede a detectable rise  in  sea level.  These
include  changes in:

     •   Surface temperatures  on land, oceans, and ice sheets

     •   Sea-ice distribution

     •   Extent of summer  melting on the polar ice sheets

     •   Areal extent and  surface elevations of the  ice sheets in Greenland and
        Antarctica.
                                    19

-------
     All of these parameters can be measured from space by satellites that are
operating now or are planned for launch during the next few years.

INTRODUCTION

     Greenhouse gases trap  heat  within the atmosphere.   Carbon  dioxide (C02)
is the most  prevalent greenhouse gas, but  there  are  more than a dozen others
present in  the  atmosphere.   Most  are becoming increasingly  abundant,  and if
present  trends  continue,  their  combined  effect could  be  equivalent to  a
doubling  of  present-day  COp  levels  by about   2050.    Most climate  models
indicate that this  would  ultimately cause global warming of  between 1.5°  and
4.5°C.  Moreover if greenhouse gases  continue  to  increase beyond 2050, global
warming will  be  even  greater.    How long  it takes  for  the warming  to be
realized will depend largely on the ocean.  If only the mixed layer (the upper
100 m or so) is affected,  then the global warming would be realized with a lag
of only a  few decades.   But if, by contrast,  the deep ocean  responds rapidly
to  increasing air  temperatures,  then global  warming could  be delayed by  a
century or  more,  much of  the additional  heat being  used to warm  the ocean
instead of  the  atmosphere.   Further uncertainty  is  introduced by the effects
of clouds, which cannot  be accurately simulated with present models.   However,
although  we  cannot  be  absolutely   certain   that   sustained  increases   in
greenhouse  gases  will  significantly  affect the  climate,  there  is  a  strong
probability that they will.  In  this  paper,  I  review possible effects of this
warming on sea level.

     Heat trapped by greenhouse gases raises the temperature of the atmosphere
and  the  ocean  (Figure  1).    The  response  of sea  level  to  this warming is
strongly  determined by  the partition  of  available  heat  between these  two
processes.   If  most of the  heat remains in the  atmosphere,  air temperatures
rise  rapidly  and sea  level is  affected most  by increased  melting of ice.
Alternatively,  rapid  transfer  of  heat   into  the  sea  would increase  ocean
temperatures, and sea  level would rise because  of  thermal  expansion  and by
accelerated  Antarctic  ice discharge  associated  with  increased melting from
beneath  the  floating   ice   shelves.    Moreover,  sea-ice  distribution  both
influences, and  is  affected by,  thermal interactions between atmosphere  and
ocean.

     At present we  cannot determine  the  partition  of heat between  ocean  and
atmosphere.     Consequently,   even  for  well-defined   rates  of  increasing
greenhouse  gases,  we cannot  accurately predict  the  response  of either  the
climate or  sea  level.   Nevertheless,  we can estimate  probable limiting rates
of  sea level  rise  by  examining  "reasonable"  climate  scenarios that  would
either favor or inhibit  sea level change.

Past Trends in Global Sea Level

     Numerous studies of long-term tide-gauge measurements suggest that global
sea  level  has  risen  10-15  cm during the last hundred  years  (e.g.,  Barnett
1983).  The reasons for  this have been  variously described to thermal expan-
sion of a  warming ocean  (Gornitz,  Lebedeff, and  Hansen  1982);  melting of  ice
from Greenland and Antarctica (Etkins and Epstein 1982) or from small ice caps
and  glaciers  in lower latitudes (Meier  1984); or  systematic downwarping of
coastlines due  to the effects  of sedimentation (Pirazolli  1986).  There is  a
consensus that the observations can be explained by the combined effects of


                                      20

-------
                    GREENHOUSE OASES
                     GLOBAL WARMNQ
ATMOSPHERE
i



SEA-ICE
DISTRIBUTION
^^^^
MCREA8ED ICE
MELTING
PARTICULARLY
IN GREENLAND



INCREASED
SNOWFALL ON
THE ICE SHEETS

SEA-LEVEL
RISE


SEA-LEVEL
FALL
1.

fS




X



OCEAN
' /
THERMAL
EXPANSION



\


V
INCREASED
MELTWQ
BENEATH
ICE SHELVES


INCREASED
ICE DISCHARGE
FROM ANTARCTICA
INTO THE OCEAN


SEA-LEVEL
RISE

Figure 1.  The Major Processes Relating Greenhouse Warming
           to Average Worldwide Sea Level
                             21

-------
melting  from  small ice  caps  and glaciers  and  of thermal expansion  of ocean
waters.  But there are no data confirming thac this is so.

     We  do  know that  glaciers  and small  ice  caps have  retreated  during the
past  100 years,  but we  cannot  accurately estimate their contribution to sea
level  rise.    Information  from  the  ocean  presents  a  yet  more  confusing
picture.  There  appears  to  have been an  increase in  sea surface temperatures
since  1900,  but  part of  this apparent  increase may  be due  to  changes in
measuring techniques.   Moreover,  the longest  time series (26  years)  of deep
hydrographic stations  (near Bermuda)  provide a very  noisy signal,  with large
decadal  temperature oscillations  superimposed on  a  net  cooling  in  the upper
1,000  m,  and  a more  systematic warming  trend  at  greater depths  (Roemmich
1985).   Further  north,  repeat measurements along  a  traverse across the north
Atlantic reveal  a cooling  and  freshening  since   1972  at all  depths  down to
4,000 m  (Swift  1984).   Considerably more measurements  from  many parts of the
ocean will  be required before  these differing trends can be explained.

     Estimates of  ice-sheet mass balance  in  Greenland  and  Antarctica are no
less ambiguous.  There is good  evidence  both for  retreat of the ice margin in
west  Greenland  and for  an  increase in surface  elevation near  the  ice sheet
summit,  and the  present consensus  is  for  an  approximate balance  between
snowfall and  losses  by melting and  iceberg calving.    However,  errors are so
large  that  the   Greenland   ice  sheet  could   be   thickening   or   thinning
sufficiently  to  cause a  sea  level  fall or  rise of up  to 0.4 mm/yr (Reeh
1985).   Antarctic  mass balance  is  even  less well measured.   Here,  consensus
opinion  is  that ice  volume  is  slowly  increasing, but available  data cannot
rule out thickening or thinning equivalent  to a sea  level change ranging from
a drop of 3 mm/yr to a rise  of 1.5 mm/yr.

     The possibility  that  the  observed  apparent   sea level  rise is due  to  a
tendency for  coastal  downwarping has intuitive attraction,  since there  is  a
continuous   transfer  of  sediments  towards  the  coast.   However, the  spatial
correlation  of observed  sea   level  increase  suggests  that  there  has  been
eustatic sea level rise during the past  100 years  (Barnett 1983).

     In summary, there probably  has been a sea level rise of  10-15 cm during
the past 100  years.   Some  of  this increase (perhaps  4  or 5  cm)  was caused by
net  melting  of glaciers  and  small  ice  caps,   and  the rest  was  probably
associated   with  thermal  expansion  of  a  warming  ocean.     Our  greatest
uncertainty regards  possible  contributions from  the  ice  sheets  in  Greenland
and Antarctica.  Indeed, the  comparatively  small  apparent change in sea level
provides better evidence for  near-equilibrium mass balance  of  the  ice sheets
than is available from many  decades of glaciological observations.

THE EFFECTS OF A CLIMATIC WARMING

     No matter what was responsible for  the recent apparent rise in sea level,
it  is certain that a significant climate warming will cause an  increase in
ocean  volume.   Rising air  temperatures will  increase  surface melt  rates on
glaciers, small  ice  caps,  and  the  Greenland ice  sheet;  a warming  ocean will
increase in volume by thermal  expansion,  and it will cause an increase in melt
rates  from  beneath the vast  floating  ice shelves around  Antarctic.   This in
itself will not change sea level, but as  the ice  shelves thin and weaken, ice
discharge from  their  tributary  glaciers will  increase, causing sea  level to
rise.  (See Figure 2 for a graphic illustration of the contribution that each


                                      22

-------
                        2000
2050
2100
                     a THERMAL
                       EXPANSION
                     b  GLACIERS AND SMALL
                        ICE CAPS
                         2000
 2050
                                                YEAR
 2100
     Figure  2.     Estimates  of  Eustatic  Sea  Level  Rise  During   the  Next
Century.    This  four-part figure depicts  sea level  rise 'due to: (a)  thermal
expansion;  (b) melting  of glaciers and small  ice  caps;  (c) melting from  the
Greenland ice sheet;  and (d)  increased  ice  discharge  from Antarctica.


     Surface air temperatures are assumed to increase linearly until 2050,  to
an average  value 3°C higher  than  at  present,  and  then  to remain  constant.
Melting from beneath Antarctic ice shelves is assumed to increase in the same
way  to  either  1  m/yr or  3  m/yr  greater  than  the  present rate.   The dark
shading  indicates  the  "most  probable"  response,  based  on  our  current
understanding of these processes.
                                      23

-------
of  these  factors makes to sea  level  rise.)   In order to assess the  contribu-
tion  to  sea level rise from  each of  these effects, I shall make some  assump-
tions about climate change during  the next century.

     Present  trends  in atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases  suggest
that together,  they may have  an effect equivalent to a doubling of CCU by  the
year 2050,  possibly sooner.   Most climate  studies  have  indicated that, once
equilibrium has been  achieved,  earth-surface temperatures will increase by  an
average of  1.5°-4.5°C,  depending on a variety of feedback mechanisms.   Warming
will occur  with a lag of a few decades  if only the ocean mixed layer  is also
warmed,  but with  a lag  of at  least 100  years  if  there  is  efficient heat
transfer to much greater depths.   Climate models take account of this transfer
by  allowing heat  to   leak  into the  deep ocean  at a  rate determined by   an
effective diffusion coefficient K  (Oeschger  et  al.  1975).  Estimates of K show
a  large  geographical  variation,  with values near the  poles up  to  100 times
greater than  those near the equator  (Hansen et al.  1984).   However,  in order
to  examine  the  transient climate  responses  to  increases  in greenhouse  gases,
simple unidimensional  models  are  used with  a  "global" value  of K of  1 to 2
cm2/sec.  These studies indicate  that the thermal inertia of the ocean  delays
climate warming by 100  years or  more  (Hansen  et al.  1984;  Siegenthaler and
Oeschger 1984).

     In order  to provide a "baseline"  estimate of sea level  rise  during the
next century, I  assume that earth-surface temperatures  increase by an  average
of  3°C by the year 2050 and remain constant thereafter.  Warming in the polar
regions will be amplified by a factor of two, and ocean conditions will change
sufficiently  to  increase  melt  rates   beneath  Antarctic   ice  shelves  from
present-day values of a few tens  of  centimeters per year by between  1 and 3
meters per year.   Moreover, I  assume  that snow  accumulation on the ice sheets
remains unchanged.  These conditions correspond to:

     *  A growth  in  greenhouse gases consistent with many  current  estimates,
        but with an arbitrary  termination of growth in 2050

     •  A swift climatic response to these gases.

     This probably represents  a "reasonable" scenario, with some attempt being
made next century to limit growth rates of greenhouse gases.  Continued growth
beyond 2050, a  larger  climate sensitivity  to C02 doubling,  or  a greater polar
amplification could result  in  a more rapid  sea level rise.   Alternatively,  a
significantly  delayed  climate   response  to   increasing   COj   and   probably
increased snow  accumulation over  the  ice sheets would  reduce  the  increase  in
sea level.   In  a  later section,  I try  to indicate probable impacts  of these
more extreme cases.

Ocean Response

     Heating of both the mixed layer and  the  deeper ocean  will  cause  sea level
to  rise by  thermal expansion.   The calculations of Hoffman, Wells, and Titus
(1985)  using a  value  of diffusivity (K)  = 1.7  cnr/sec yield a  sea level rise
of almost 30 cm  for a  global warming  of  3°C  by  2055,  and  I  have adapted their
estimates to compile Figure 2a.   After 2050,  sea level  continues to  increase,
but at a slower pace,  since further heating  is  mainly by  leakage of  heat into
the deeper ocean (given the assumption that temperatures remain  constant after
2050).

                                      24

-------
     Such a  major climatic  change  is bound to  be accompanied by  changes in
ocean circulation, atmospheric  pressure,  and surface winds.   These also will
affect sea  level.   They will  not affect the  ocean volume; they  will simply
redistribute it.  At present, we cannot predict these effects,  but regionally,
they may  cause a  raising  or lowering  of sea level  of up  to a  few  tens of
centimeters superimposed on the eustatic change.

     Changes  in  sea-ice  distribution,   rainfall,  winds,  temperatures,  and
freshwater inflow will all  affect the density structure and mixing rate in the
upper layers  of  the  ocean.    These,  in  turn, will  affect how  rapidly  heat
diffuses into  the  deeper ocean.  So  the  effective diffusivity,  K,  may change
with time.   In particular, the present-day areas  of  high  diffusivity  at high
latitudes may  be capped by  layers  of  low-density surface water  which would
inhibit cooling of deeper water by convective overturning (Figure 3).  The net
result could  be  a significant  increase in  the  amount  of heat  penetrating
beneath the Antarctic ice shelves.
                  Figure  3.   Heat Transfer Within the Ocean

     There is  rapid  cooling  in specific areas within the  polar regions where
     convective overturning brings  warm water to the surface.   A significant
     change  in  climate  could  alter   ocean  stratification  sufficiently  to
     inhibit this process and trigger  a long-term warming of  the deep ocean.
     This  in  turn would  cause a major  increase  in  melting from  beneath the
     Antarctic ice shelves.
                                      25

-------
Surface Melting from Glaciers and Ice Sheets

     Meier  (1984)  calculated  that,  during  the  past  60  years,  melting  of
glaciers and  small  ice caps has  contributed to sea level  rise  at an average
rate of about 0.5 mm/yr.  He further estimated that a rise in air temperatures
of 1.5° to 4.5°C could  lead  to  glacier wastage equivalent to 1.7-5.2 mm/yr of
sea level rise  and a total rise by the year  2100 of 8-25  cm.   In the climate
scenario that I  have adopted,  temperatures  rise more  rapidly  than assumed by
Meier, which  yields  a rise in sea  level  of 12-42  cm by 2100.   In Figure 2b,
however, I  indicate  the preferred  value  to be about 20 cm  because,  as Meier
stresses,   the   area  of  glacier  ice   would  progressively   diminish,  and
precipitation on many of the glaciers may increase.  The preferred value of 20
cm  is,  of  course,   arbitrary,  but  the  actual rise  is unlikely  to  be much
greater, since the total volume of glaciers and small ice caps is estimated as
equivalent to between 30 and 60 cm of sea level.

     Meier's estimates did not  include possible increases  in melting from the
ice  sheets  in  Greenland  and  Antarctica.   At present,  there  is  negligible
wastage from  the Antarctic ice  sheet  by  surface melting,  and temperatures are
so  low  that  a   3°C  rise  in  global  temperatures  may  not  cause  significant
wastage by  2100.  In Greenland,  by  contrast,  about  half the  wastage  is  by
melting, at an  average rate exceeding  1  m/yr, from approximately  15$ of the
ice-sheet surface.   The effect  of a warming climate  would be twofold:  higher
temperatures would increase the melt rate; and the  equilibrium line separating
accumulation from ablation would be elevated, exposing  a greater percentage of
the ice-sheet area to melting.  There may also be  an increase in glacier flow
rates (and hence more ice discharged into the sea) associated  with enhanced
lubrication by drainage of greater amounts of surface meltwater to the glacier
bed.   We cannot at  present  assess  the  importance of  this process,  but  we
should flag it as one of the many wild cards in the deck of greenhouse-warming
impacts.

     Bindschadler (1985) developed  a  simple model  to predict  the  response  of
the Greenland ice-sheet  to warmer climates.  Using available  measurements  of
the atmospheric  lapse rate,  he estimated that the equilibrium  line  would  be
elevated between 500 m and  1,000 m for  a  6°C  rise in air  temperatures over
Greenland.   Because of  the anticipated polar amplification of global warming,
this corresponds to  a 3°C rise in  average  global  temperatures.   Bindschadler
estimated that the resulting excessive melting would cause a sea level rise of
1.3  mm/yr  for  a  500-m elevation  in  equilibrium line,  and  3-5 mm/yr  for
1,000 m.   Bindschadler estimated that the  rate  of sea  level rise  would  be
approximately  30%  greater if  the  rate of iceberg  calving  is  related  to
meltwater  discharge,  as  suggested  by   Sikonia's  (1982)  study  of  calving
glaciers.   The  total  rise  by the  year 2100 would  thus  be between 13 cm and 34
cm (Figure 2c).
                                      26

-------
Accelerated Ice Discharge from Antarctica

     Most of  the  ice  flowing from Antarctica drains  via (relatively) rapidly
moving ice streams into floating ice shelves (Figure 4).  The ice streams push
the ice shelves seaward  past their irregular sides  and over and around areas
where the ice shelf has run aground on shoaling sea beds.  To do this, the ice
streams build up a "gravitational head" by becoming thicker than they would if
the ice shelves were not there.  Consequently, removal or weakening of the ice
shelves  would permit  the  ice  streams  to  thin  and  discharge their  excess
thickness  into  the ocean.   In many cases,  an  ice stream would  contribute a
small amount  to  sea level  rise and then  acquire  a new  thickness  profile in
equilibrium with  the  modified  ice-shelf  conditions.   For other  ice streams,
however, particularly  many  of  those  in  West Antarctica  which  flow over rock
that  is  well below sea  level,  they  may  thin  sufficiently  to float free of
bedrock.  Then, if the ice shelves continue to weaken, most of the ice in West
Antarctica  could  progressively  drain  into  the  ocean.   This  possibility  is
often raised as the major disastrous consequence of climatic warming.  Indeed,
it  may  ultimately  occur,  but many  studies have  shown  that  it  would  take
several hundred  years (see  for instance, Thomas,  Sanderson, and  Rose  1979;
Bentley 1984).
          Figure 4.  An  Ice Stream Flowing into a Floating  Ice Shelf

     This  ice stream is grounded on  bedrock  that  is well below sea level, as
     occurs  today  in many  parts of Antarctica.  The larger  ice shelves occupy
     large   embayments   which,   together  with  locally  grounded   ice  rises,
     restrict seaward  motion  of the  ice.   This  results  in a  back pressure
     exerted on the  ice  stream.  Weakening of  the ice shelf by increased basal
     melting would  reduce  the  back  pressure and permit more  rapid   ice
     discharge along the ice stream.
                                       27

-------
     At present,  the  Antarctic ice shelves are  able  to survive because there
is virtually no melting from their upper surfaces, and melting from beneath is
limited by  the  restricted amount of ocean  heat  that  reaches the ice shelves.
This  is  because  the  ocean  bordering  Antarctica  is  very  weakly  stratified,
permitting convective overturning of warm  deep  water,  which loses heat to the
sea ice and  the atmosphere before penetrating beneath  the ice shelves.  This
is the principal  mechanism by which the deep ocean  is  cooled (See Figure 3).
One consequence of climatic warming may be a more strongly stratified southern
ocean (Gordon 1983; Jacobs 1985).  This could have two consequences:  it could
limit  cooling  of  the  deep  ocean  and,  hence,  accelerate  the rate  of ocean
warming (and  associated  thermal expansion)  and it could  allow significantly
more  heat  to penetrate beneath the  ice  shelves  and  increase  basal melting
rates.

     In order to  estimate associated  rates  of  sea level  rise,  Thomas (1985)
assumed that climatic warming  would increase basal melt rates beneath all ice
shelves,  starting  in  the  year 2000,  by either 1 m/yr or 3 m/yr by 2050.   The
value  of  1 m/yr  was chosen because  it  is consistent with  Gordon's  (1983)
estimate of possible  ocean warming close to Antarctica and MacAyeal's (1984)
analysis of the dependence of  basal melting on  ocean  temperatures.  The value
of 3  m/yr  represents  an extreme upper  limit, with  circumpolar deep water
reaching the  ice shelves  without  major cooling,  as  appears  to  be  happening
today on the west coast of the Antarctic Peninsula.

     In the  simplest  case, Thomas assumed  that ice discharge rates  from ice
streams into the  ice  shelves would increase sufficiently  to replace  ice lost
by enhanced melting.  A more elaborate model attempts to simulate the dynamic
response of  the tributary ice  streams  and to estimate  the corresponding ice
discharge  rates.   The  two models  are  in  close agreement,  with  an  estimated
total sea level rise by the  year 2100  of about  20 cm for ice shelf melting of
1 m/yr, and about 80  cm for  shelf  melting  of 3  m/yr (Figure 2d).  Thomas also
attempted to asssess the consequences  of a massive increase in iceberg calving
from the ice shelves.   If this occurred in 2050, then total sea level rise by
2100 for either melting rate  could be  close to  2 m.  However, such calving is
unlikely unless  air temperatures  rise  considerably higher  than  is  predicted
during the next  century.   Of course,   if temperatures  continue to rise beyond
the year 2100,  the ice shelves probably will ultimately break up, thus causing
a much larger rise in sea level.

     Our  present  understanding  of  ocean/ice   interactions  indicates  that
melting beneath  the very  large ice  shelves is  unlikely to  increase  by  more
than  1 m/yr,   but  I  stress  that  our  understanding  is  still  rudimentary.
Nevertheless, in Figure 2d, I indicate the lower curve as preferred.

Sea Level Rise Through 2100

     Summing the  plots  for each of the four processes in  Figure  2 gives the
estimate of total sea level  rise shown in  Figure 5.   The total sea level rise
by 2100  for the assumed  scenario  of  climate change  is estimated to  be  0.9-
1.7 m, with a preferred value close to 110 cm.
                                      28

-------
             2000
2050
2100
               2000
 2050
                                           YEAR
 2100
      Figure 5.  Total Sea Level Rise During the Next Century

The dark  shading indicates  the most  probable  response  to  the climate
scenario described in the  caption  to Figure 2.   The broken line depicts
the response to  a warming  trend delayed 100 years by thermal inertia of
the ocean.  A global warming of 6°C  by  2100, which  represents an extreme
upper limit, would result in a  sea level rise of about  2.3 m, but  errors
on this estimate are very large.
                                 29

-------
FACTORS THAT MAY INFLUENCE THE RATE AT WHICH THE SEA RISES

     No  extreme  assumptions  were  made  in  deriving  the  above  estimate.
Therefore, I suggest  that we should take  very  seriously the possibility that
sea  level  will rise by  approximately  1 m during  the next  century.   Clearly
many  factors  could  either  delay or  accelerate  this  rise:    I  now  try  to
establish some probable limits by quantifying these factors.

Delayed Warming

     The assumed climate sensitivity of a 3°C average warming for an effective
doubling of  C02 represents  a fair consensus of the many  attempts  that have
been  made  to  model  the  climate  response.    Moreover,   there  is  a  good
probability that equivalent doubling of C02 will occur next century.   However,
there will almost certainly  be a  lag of many decades between the COp doubling
and climatic warming {Hansen  et al.  1984;  Siegenthaler  and Oeschger  1984) due
to  diffusion of  heat into  the  deep  ocean.   This  will  have  two  important
effects:   Air  temperatures prior  to 2100  will  be lower than  I  have assumed,
reducing the amount by which the sea will rise because of surface melting from
glaciers, small ice caps, and the Greenland ice sheet.  In addition,  the ocean
mixed  layer  will warm   more  slowly  than  assumed  earlier,  and  a  greater
proportion of available heat will escape into the deep ocean.

     In  order   to  assess  how sensitive  sea  level  is  to  these effects,  I
recalculate the curves in Figure 2 and obtain a 3°C increase in average global
temperature  by  2150,  one  hundred years later  than in  the  earlier  scenario.
For  Greenland,  I  have  attempted  to  correct  the  estimates for drainage  of
meltwater into  the underlying, porous  firn by requiring  meltwater to saturate
the  firn before any  runoff  into  the  ocean  can  occur.    In  this  case,  the
Greenland  ice  sheet contributes  9  ±  4 cm  to  sea level  rise  by  2100,  and
glaciers and ice caps  contribute  an  additional  14  ± 8 cm.   This last estimate
is close to  the preferred value  in Figure  2b,  which was constrained to be low
by  the  limited  volume  of this  source of meltwater.  The  thermal  expansion
values calculated by  Hoffman,  Wells, and Titus  (1985) for their low scenario
provide  an  estimate appropriate  to global  warming of  2.3°C by 2100,  which
corresponds  closely  to a  3 C  increase  by  2150.   Their  estimate of  total sea
level  rise by  2100  due to thermal expansion is  approximately  28 cm.   For the
Antarctic contribution,  I assumed  that basal melt  rates  will  increase  to 1
m/yr  by  2150,   and  I  have  not considered the  possibility of higher  melting
rates  beneath  the  large  ice shelves, since these  would  require  major changes
to  ocean characteristics  around  Antarctica.    Sea level  rise  by  2100  from
Antarctic  ice   discharge  then becomes  approximately  13 cm.    Moreover,  the
effects  of enhanced snow accumulation  over Antarctica associated with climate
warming  could reduce this  to  less  than 10  cm (National Research Council 1985,
p. 64).  The sum of these modified estimates, which probably represent a lower
bound, yields a total approximately equivalent to a 60-cm rise by 2100.

Increased Warming

     Three factors could result in a sea level rise significantly greater than
the "baseline" value of  110 cm by 2100:

     •  Continued growth  in greenhouse gases beyond an equivalent COo doubling
         by 2050


                                      30

-------
     •  Polar amplification greater than doubling of the global warming

     •  Greater climate sensitivity to doubled CC^*

     To estimate  the  effect of  these  factors,  I assume a  4.5°C  climate sen-
sitivity  to  doubled  CCU  with  a  threefold  polar  amplification,  and  an
equivalent 150$ increase of C02 by 2100.  This represents an extreme scenario,
and  1  shall  try  to  retain  realism by imposing  a  30-year delay  on  climate
response,   and a  requirement  that  Greenland meltwater  saturate porous firn
before  draining   into  the  ocean.  The  large   increase   in  high-latitude
temperatures  implies  that  there  probably  would  be appreciable surface melting
in Antarctica.   However,  I  do not attempt  to  estimate how much;  instead, I
assume it will balance effects of increased snow accumulation.

     Extrapolation of the impact on glaciers and ice sheets of such an extreme
warming is at best  approximate, and  I stress  that  errors on  the resulting
estimate are  large.   Many  small  glaciers  and ice caps would disappear with an
associated  sea  level  rise  of about 35 cm.   All of the Greenland ice sheet
would  become  an  area  of net  ablation  by 2100,  contributing  approximately 9
mm/yr  to sea  level  rise  (Bindschadler  1985),  with a total associated increase
of perhaps U5 cm.  For the Antarctic, I adopt the upper limit of an 80-cm rise
by 2100  shown in Figure  2d,  corresponding to an  increase  in ice-shelf basal
melting of 3 m/yr.   This may be a low estimate  primarily  because such warm
climatic conditions  could result in accelerated  break-up of parts  of the  ice
shelves to  permit  far greater ice discharge  into the sea.  Under the Hoffman,
Wells,  and Titus  (1985)  "warm  scenario," thermal expansion  is  estimated to
increase sea  level  by a 6°C  rise in global  temperatures  over 100 years.   The
total  increase in sea level by  2100 then becomes  2.3 m.   I regard  this as an
extreme upper limit  corresponding  to  a  climatic  change  so  severe  that  the
effects of  impacts on  global weather and agriculture could well dwarf those of
even  such  a dramatic  rise in sea level.  Nevertheless, it highlights the need
for us to develop a better understanding of just what increased concentrations
of "greenhouse" gases  will do  to the climate.

INDICATORS  OF A GLOBAL WARMING TREND CAN BE DETECTED

      No matter what the total rise in  sea level  turns out  to be by the year
2100,  it   is  certain  that  initial  acceleration will be  very slow.   It will
probably not  be  detectable before  2020 at the  earliest.  Thereafter, the rate
at which  sea level will  rise  will  progressively increase to about 1 cm/yr by
2100,  after which  the  rate will probably continue to  increase.   In order to
plan  for such a comparatively  rapid rise  in sea  level,  it would be  valuable to
establish  an  early  warning  program  to detect  the  first  signs of the greenhouse
warming.    1  describe a  set of satellite measurements that would contribute
significantly towards such  a program.

      A sustained  climatic  warming will  inevitably cause  changes  in  surface
temperatures  on  the  oceans,  ice cover, and  land, with associated changes in
surface  winds.   These changes,  in  turn,  will affect the extent, distribution
and  compactness  of sea ice in the  Arctic and around  Antarctica.  Moreover, if
air  temperatures  increase in the polar regions, there  will  an  increase in  the
area  of  summer  melt  zones on  the ice  sheets in Greenland  and  Antarctica.
Finally,  after a  considerable delay, the  extent and surface elevation of these
 ice  sheets will  change,  probably  in a complex  way.   All of  these parameters


                                       31

-------
can  be  measured from  space with  instruments that  are  operating now  or are
planned for launch during the next few years  (Thomas 1986).

Changes in Surface Temperatures

     Infrared radiometers  have been  flown aboard a series  of polar-orbiting
weather satellites  since  1972.   By  scanning a  broad  swath  along  the orbit
track, they obtain global coverage every day.  These data provide estimates of
surface temperatures on the oceans, land, and ice.  Unfortunately, calibration
problems  make  it  difficult  to  intercompare  data  from different  sensors.
Moreover,  atmospheric effects  limit accuracy of the estimated temperatures to
about ± 1°C.  However,  calibration of future  instruments will be improved, and
a  new  instrument,  which  will reduce  the  uncertainty  attributable  to  the
atmosphere,  will  fly   aboard   the  European Space  Agencies  Remote  Sensing
Satellite  (ERS-1)  in  the early 1990s.   Infrared measurements are limited by
cloud cover, and to overcome this  a  Low Frequency Microwave Radiometer (LFMR)
with an all-weather capability  for measuring sea-surface temperatures will be
flown aboard a U.S. Navy spacecraft,  also in  the early 1990s.

     Rigorous  intercomparison  of  these  various  techniques  for  measuring
surface temperature  will improve  the accuracy  of  the  long-term measurements
from  weather  satellites  (Njoku  1985).    Moreover,  the  large polar-orbiting
satellites planned as part  of  NASA's  Space Station  and ESA's Columbus program
will  provide opportunities for  long-term   continued  operation  of  the  new
infrared and microwave radiometers.

Changes in Sea Ice Cover

     Estimates of the extent,  distribution, and compactness of  polar sea ice
have  been made  almost  continuously since  1972  using  data  from  microwave
radiometers aboard NASA's  Nimbus  satellites  (Zwally et  al,  1983a; Cavalieri,
Gloersen,  and Campbell  1984;  Swift,   Fedor,  and Ramseier  1985;).   These data
have  already  revealed  major  interannual  changes  in sea  ice extent,  but no
clear  long-term trend.    Similar data  will be  acquired  by future  weather
satellites of the U.S.  Navy and Air  Force,  promising a time series of sea ice
observations extending over several decades.

Summer Melting in Greenland and Antarctica

     Because surface slopes are very small over  the vast ice  sheets, a small
rise  in  the  surface elevation  of  the  0°C  summer isotherm  causes a large
increase  in  the area subject  to  surface melting.   Wet snow  has  a  microwave
emission  that  is quite distinct  from  that  of  dry snow,  and the extent of
summer melting  can  readily be mapped using data from  radiometers aboard the
Nimbus and U.S.  Navy/Air Force spacecraft (Zwally and Gloersen 1977).

Topography and Extent of Ice Sheet

     Significant change  in  the size  of  the continental ice sheets will  be  a
comparatively  slow  response  to   climatic  warming.    Nevertheless,  it  is
important,  periodically (perhaps  every  5-10 years)  to map accurately their
areal extent and surface topography.   Here,  it is useful  to note  that  a 1-cm
rise in sea level is equivalent to a  25-cm change in thickness over the entire
Antarctic  ice sheet.   Moreover, actual  ice-sheet changes are more  likely to


                                      32

-------
occur within  individual drainage  basins  than uniformly  over the  entire ice
sheet.   This  would further  increase sensitivity  so  that,  for  a sea-level
change of  less than  1  cm,  ice  thickness  within the affected  drainage basin
would probably change by several meters, which would be readily detectable by
a satellite radar altimeter (Zwally et al.  1983b).

     The areal extent of the  ice sheets  can  be  accurately mapped using images
obtained at  visible wavelengths (from the  U.S.  Landsat/Eosat and  the French
SPOT  missions),  and  at  microwave  frequencies  by  synthetic aperture radar
(SAR).  Although Landsat-type data have  been obtained since 1972 there is but
poor and intermittent coverage of Greenland and Antarctica.  A SAR was carried
aboard  NASA's  Seasat  in  1978,   but very   few  images  were  obtained  over
Greenland,   and  none  from  Antarctica.     However,  there  will  be  several
opportunities  during  the  next  decade  to  map  the  ice  sheets using  high-
resolution radar imagery.

Changes in the Speed and Direction of Ocean Winds

     Estimates of  ocean  surface winds  can  be  derived from measurements  of
either  microwave  emissions  or  radar backscatter.    The  necessary  passive-
microwave data (providing estimates of wind speed but not direction) have been
acquired since  1978 by Nimbus-7 and  will  be extended  into  the  1990s by U.S.
Navy/Air Force weather satellites.   A radar scatterometer aboard NASA's Seasat
provided estimates of sea-surface winds over almost the entire globe every two
days.   Scatterometers  will  be  included aboard  three  satellites  planned for
flight during the early 1990s.

Changes in Ocean Surface Topography

     Many  radar  altimeters  are  planned for  flight  during the next decade and
similar  instruments will  almost  certainly  be  included  aboard  Space Station
and/or Columbus  polar  platforms.   They are designed primarily to measure very
accurately  the  surface  topography of  the ocean,  with the  effects  of waves
smoothed.   Range measurements  from satellite to sea  surface are accurate to
between  2  and 10  cm.   However, radar  altimeter data  are  unlikely to reveal
sea-level  trends because satellite  orbit errors  limit the accuracy  of absolute
sea  surface  elevation to a few  tenths  of  a meter.   Nevertheless,  significant
changes  over time  in  ocean  currents will be detectable, since they manifest
themselves as  changes  in the  regional tilt of the ocean surface.

SUMMARY

      The conclusion that  sea level will probably rise  by about  1 m by  2100 if
climate  becomes  significantly  warmer  due  to  increasing  atmospheric  con-
centrations  of  manmade gases  is   not  new  (see  for  instance,  Revelle  1983;
Hoffman,  Keyes,  and  Titus  1983).    Earlier  reports, however,  focused on sea
level rise  due  to  thermal  expansion  with  almost ad hoc  estimates  of the
effects of melting ice.  Here,  I have tried  to address  explicity all  potential
contributions  to  a  eustatic rise  in  sea   level,  incorporating  results  of
analyses  presented  in  a report  published  by  the  National  Research  Council
 (1985).  Three conclusions  can  be  drawn  from this summary:

      •   Sea  level  will probably  rise  by  0.6-2.3  m  by  2100, with a  "most
         probable"  rise  of about 1  m.
                                       33

-------
     •  The increase in sea level will be very slow for the first few decades,
        but thereafter rates  will  increase  progressively.   This increase will
        probably not be unambiguously detectable until the year 2020 or later.

     •  There  will probably  be little  net  contribution  to  sea  level  rise
        during the  next  century from the ice  in  Antarctica  unless conditions
        in  the southern  ocean  change dramatically.    If  climate  warming  is
        sustained,  however,   ice  discharge  from  Antarctica   will  ultimately
        become the dominant cause of sea level rise, with the possibility of a
        several-metre increase during the following centuries.

     Because sea  level  rise will  initially  be very slow, it  is  important to
develop an  early  warning system for  detection of  proxy  indicators that will
herald the predicted climatic warming.   This could be achieved principally by
monitoring from space these parameters:

     •  Surface temperatures (on the oceans, ice, and land).

     •  Extent and compactness of the sea-ice cover in both polar regions.

     •  Areal extent of summer  melt zones on the Greenland and Antarctica ice
        sheets.

     •  Areal extent and surface topography of these ice sheets.

     The instruments needed to  measure all  these  parameters  are either aboard
existing satellites or are  planned for launch during  the  next few  years.  It
will be  important  to  coordinate  the  observation  and  analysis programs for
these various instruments in order to ensure compilation of a long time series
of compatible measurements.
REFERENCES

Barnett, T.P.  1983.  Recent  changes  in sea-level  and their  possible  causes.
     Climate Change.  (5):15-38.

Bentley, C.R.  1984.   Some aspects of  the  cryosphere  and  its  role in climatic
     change. In Climatic process and climate sensitivity,  Maurice Ewing Series
     5,  eds.  J.E.  Hansen  and  T.  Takahashi,   207-220.    Washington,  D.C.:
     American Geophysical Union.

Bindschadler,  R.A.  1985.   Contribution of the Greenland  ice  cap to changing
     sea-level:   Present  and future. In Glaciers,  ice sheets,  and sea level:
     effects  of  a  CO^-induced  climatic   change,  258-266. Washington,  D.C.:
     National Academy Press.

Cavalieri,  D.J.,  W.J.  Campbell,  and P. Gloersen.  1984.   Determination of sea
     ice  parameters  with  Nimbus-7  SMMR.    Journal of Geophysical  Research.
     89:5355-5369.

Etkins, R.,  and E.S.  Epstein. 1982.  The  rise  of  global  mean sea-level as an
     indication of climate change. Science 215:287-289.

-------
Gordon, A.L. 1983.  Comments about the ocean role in the Antarctic glacial ice
     balance. In Proceedings of  the COg  Research Conference;   C02 science and
     consensus,  75-96. Washington, D.C.—. U.S. Department of Energy.

Gornitz, V., L.  Lebedeff, and  J.  Hansen.  1982.   Global sea-level trend in the
     past century. Science 215:1611-1614.

Hansen, J., A. Lacis,  D.  Rind,  G.  Russel,  P. Stone, I. Fung,  R. Ruedy, and J.
     Lerner. 1984.  Climate sensitivity:   Analysis  of feedback mechanisms. In
     Climate  processes   and   climate  sensitivity,   eds.  J.E.   Hansen  and
     T. Takahaski,  130-163.    Maurice  Ewing  Series  5.  Washington,  D.C.:
     American Geophysical Union.

Hoffman, J.S.,  D. Keyes, and  J.G. Titus.  1983. Projecting  future  sea level
     rise:  Methodology,  estimates to the  year  2100,  and research  needs.  GPO
     #055-000-0236-3. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

Hoffman, J.S., J. B.  Wells, and  J.  G.  Titus, 1985.   Future global warming and
     sea level rise.  In  Bruun, Per (ed.)  Iceland Symposium '85.    Reykjavik,
     Iceland: National Energy Authority.

Jacobs, S.S., 1985.  Oceanographic evidence for land ice/ocean interactions in
     the southern ocean.  In Glaciers?  ice  sheets, and sea level:  Effects of a
     C02-induced climatic change.  116-128. Washington, D.C.:  National Academy
     Press.

MacAyeal,  D.R.  1984.  Thermohaline  circulation  below  the  Ross Ice Shelf:   A
     consequence of tidally induced vertical mixing and basal  melting. Journal
     of Geophysical Research 89:597-606.

Meier,  M.F.  1984.   The  contribution of  small glaciers  to global sea-level.
     Science 226:1418-1421.

National  Research  Council.   1985.    Glaciers,  ice  sheets,   and  sea  level;
     Effects  of  a  CO^-induced  climatic  change.  Washington,  D.C.:  National
     Academy Press.   -

Njoku,  E.   1985.     Satellite-derived  sea  surface  temperatures:  Workshop
     comparisons. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 66:274.

Oeschger,  H.,  U.  Siegenthaler,  U.  Schotterer,  and  Gugelmann.  1975.   A  box
     diffusion  model  to  study  the  carbon  dioxide  exchange  in   the nature.
     Tellus 27:168-192.

Pirazolli,  P.A.   1986.   Secular  trends  of  relative  sea-level (RSL) changes
     indicated  by tide-gauge  records.  Journal  of  Coastal Research. Special
     Issue  1:1-26.

Reeh,  N.  1985.    Greenland  ice-sheet mass balance  and sea level  change.   In
     Glaciers,  ice  sheets,  and sea level:   Effects of a CO^-induced climatic
     change.  155-171.  Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
                                      35

-------
Revelle,  R.R.   1983.    Probable  future  changes  in  sea-level  resulting -from
     increased  atmospheric  carbon  dioxide.   In Changing climate:   Report of
     the  Carbon  Dioxide  Assessment  Committee,   433-448.  Washington,  D.C.:
     National Academy Press.

Roemmich, D.  1985.    Sea-level and  the  thermal variability of  the  ocean. In
     Glaciers,  ice  sheets,  and sea level;   Effects  of a COo-induced climatic
     change,  104-115. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

Siegenthaler, U., and H. Oeschger.  1984.  Transient temperature changes due to
     increasing COg using simple models. Annals of Glaciology 5:153-159.

Sikonia, W.G. 1982.   Finite element glacier dynamics model applied to Columbia
     Glacier, Alaska.   U.S.  Geological  Survey Professional  Paper,  1258B, p.
     74.

Swift, J.H.  1984. A recent 0-S shift  in  the  deep water of  the northern North
     Atlantic.  In  Climate process and climate sensitivity,  eds.  J.E.  Hansen
     and  T.  Takahashi.  39-47.   Maurice Ewing  Series  5,  Washington,  D.C:
     American Geophysical Union.

Swift, C.T.,  L.S. Fedor, and  R.O. Samseier.  1985. An algorithm to measure sea
     ice  concentration with  microwave  radiometers.  Journal  of  Geophysical
     Research 90 (Cl):1087-1099.

Thomas, R.H.  1985.   Responses  of the polar ice sheets to climatic warming. In
     Glaciers,  ice  sheets,  and sea  level:  Effects  of a CO^-induced climatic
     change.  301-316. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Pre^s.

Thomas, R.H.  1986.   Satellite  remote  sensing  over ice. Journal of Geophysical
     Research 91 (C2) :2493-2502.

Thomas,  R.H.,   T.J.O.  Sanderson,  and K.E.  Rose  1979.   Effect of  climatic
     warming on the West Antarctic  ice sheet. Nature 277:355-358.

Zwally, H.J., and  P. Gloersen.  1977.   Passive microwave images of  the polar
     regions and research applications. Polar Record 18:431-450.

Zwally, H.J., J.C.  Comiso, C.L.  Parkinson, W.J. Campbell, F.D. Carsey,  and P.
     Gloersen.  1983a.    Antarctic   sea  ice,   1973-1976:   Satellite  passive-
     microwave observations. NASA Special Paper, No.  459, p. 206.

Zwally, H.J., R. A.  Bindschadler, A.C.  Brenner, T.V.  Martin,  and R.H. Thomas.
     1983b.  Surface elevation contours of Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets.
     Journal of Geophysical Research 88:(C3)1589-1596.
                                      36

-------
Flooding in Taipei, Taiwan and Coastal Drainage

Chin Kuo
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Blacksburg, Virginia USA
ABSTRACT

     Coastal  drainage  problems associated with the existing  inadequate drain-
age system and land subsidence in the city of Taipei  are  discussed.  Impacts
on  the  system due  to potential sea  level rise  are  illustrated.   General
implications  for  all coastal  communities of designing  today  a  drainage system
that will protect against  rise in sea  level or retrofitting  the system in  the
future are examined.

INTRODUCTION

     The uniqueness of flooding  in  the coastal areas  can  be characterized by
two key parameters:  flat  terrains and tidal effects (Kuo 1984).  The hydrau-
lic head  available  for  gravity  drainage,  either by storm sewer pipes or by
channels, is  generally small.  A side  effect of  the poor and slow drainage is
a decrease in the transport rate of sediment and  debris, which further reduces
the pipe and channel flow  capacities.   During  extraordinary  storms,  such as a
hurricane or  typhoon, the  tide  elevation  associated with the  storm  surge is
high.   As a  result,  flood protection measures,  such  as  flood walls, levees,
pumping  stations,  and  flap gates are necessary.  If sea level  rises and/or
land  subsides,  the head  against which  pumps  work  will  further  increase,
creating  an  undesirable  planning and  design  situation for  coastal  drainage
(Kuo  1986).  This paper discusses these coastal stormwater management problems
using  the city  of  Taipei  as  an  example  to  illustrate  how  the  existing
inadequate  drainage  problems  are   intensified  subject  to  ongoing   land
subsidence and future  sea  level  rise.

BASIN CHARACTERISTICS AND  BASIC  HYDROLOGY DATA

      The  city of  Taipei is situated  in the Taipei Basin about 17 km from  the
ocean and is  surrounded by the  Hsintien River on  the south, the Tamsui  River
on  the  west,  the Keelung River  on  the  north, and hills  on  the  east  and


                                      37

-------
southeast.  The  elevation in the basin  ranges  from 1.3 m to  7  m in the city
with  an  average slope  of 0.1%  running  from southeast to northwest.   Three
rivers  (the  Tamsui  River is  the  largest)  are all  tidal rivers  subject  to
moderate tidal influence.  The Tamsui River has a watershed of 2726 m , annual
mean  flow  of 6835  x 10" nP  and a  200-year flood discharge  of 25,000 cubic
meters per second.   Mean annual rainfall in the basin is 295 cm.  Based on the
recorded rainfall  data,  15%  of storms  have their peak discharge  within the
first 20 minutes of  the storm,  due  to short river reach, steep river bed, and
high rainfall intensity.

     The normal  high tide of the Tamsui River  at  the  Taipei  Bridge is 1.32 m
above sea  level, which  is higher than part  of  the  city.   The river stage for
5-  and  200-year storms are  4.58  m  and 8.43  m,  respectively  (Public Works
Department, City of Taipei 1982).

INADEQUACIES OF THE PRESENT DRAINAGE SYSTEM

     There are  six major  drainage  subsystems  in  the city (Figure  1), which
drain about  6,700 ha.    The  total  length  of the  storm  sewer trunk  line  is
424 m, and the  total  length  of levee  along the  three  rivers  is  53,408  m.
There are  30  pumping stations.   The total  volume  of storm  runoff  pumped  is
374.1  cubic   meters  per  second  (Public  Works  Department,   City  of  Taipei
1982).  The drainage system is by gravity for normal tidal stage  in the rivers
and  under  pumping for  high  river  stages  during  the  typhoon events.   More
pumping stations and drainage mains are under construction.

     The current design  criteria  for the  storm  sewer system is based  on  a
typical 5-year summer thunderstorm event.  Pumping stations are designed for a
5-year typhoon  for  normal  operation, and  their capacity  is for  a  200-year
storm.

     Traditionally,  the metropolitan  area  has  frequently experienced major
floodings  along  the rivers  due to  inadequate  channel  capacity  and  heavy
rainfalls.   In  addition,  there are  a  lot of problems  associated with  the
planning,  design,  construction, and  maintenance of  the city  storm  drainage
systems.   Major problems include:

     •  Surface  runoff  within  the  city and flood flow  in   the surrounding
        rivers  have  increased  due   to  rapid  urbanization   in   the  past  25
        years.   The  drainage system  at  the downstream end of the  basin does
        not have enough capacity to handle the runoff generated from headwater
        areas where most of the urbanization takes place.

     •  The existing drainage system, initially  designed  more  than 50 years
        ago for a 2-year storm, has proven to be inadequate to accommodate the
        urban growth.

     •  There exists a  serious problem of  pipe clogging due  to deposition  of
        debris,  sediment,  residuals  of  construction,  and  other  factors.   At
        the foot of the  hill,  massive  sediment  deposition  often  blocks  the
        entrances of the storm sewer pipes.
                                      38

-------
Figure 1.   Sub-drainage Basins in the City of Taipei
           Source:  Public Works Department,  City of Taipei 1982
                          39

-------
     •  During the  typhoon  period,  the river stages  are high.   Some areas do
        not have levees.  Leakage of flap gates occurs frequently.

     •  The number  of pumping  stations is  not  sufficient and  capacities of
        pumps are not adequate.

     •  Subsidence  of  the entire basin due to  excessive groundwater pumping
        creates many local  impoundments,  lowers  the river levees, reduces the
        hydraulic head available for gravity drainage,  and increases the head
        against which  water  must be pumped.   Land subsidence  has aggravated
        the existing  inadequate drainage  system.   Figure 2 shows  that sub-
        sidence of  2  m has  been  observed  in the  field during  the  period of
        1955-1977 (Public Works Department, City  of  Taipei 1980).   The sub-
        sidence problem has  been  under  control  of  the  groundwater pumping
        law.   However,  it   takes  at  least 20  years  for the  subsidence to
        stabilize.  A  computer simulation  of  drainage systems  in  Taipei has
        been carried out to  assess the current  flooding and to predict future
        flooding due to land  subsidence (Yen et  al. 1979).  Using 1979 as the
        reference time, the  authors  predict that  in  subdrainage  area III the
        flood area  less than  3  m above sea level (which was 0.005 ha in  1979)
        will be 65 ha in 1989 and 346 ha in 1999.  The flooding will be mainly
        due to land subsidence, the  incapability of gravity drainage by storm
        sewer pipe networks, and forced drainage by pump and levee systems.

     Current plans  to upgrade  the existing system  recommend  that  the  city
increase the number of pumping stations,  expand the drainage  pipe  networks,
and  improve  the levee  system at a  cost of $41 million  (U.S.)  for  the next
eight years.   The  improvements would compensate  for  urbanization  and  land
subsidence problems expected through the year 2000.

THE IMPACT OF SEA LEVEL RISE ON THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM IN TAIPEI

     With the anticipated global sea level rise and  possible  increase in the
amount of rainfall  due  to the greenhouse effect,  the current  design criteria
will be  inadequate  and the  city will  be subjected to  more intense  flooding.
Neither the existing system  nor the upgraded design  take sea  level  rise into
consideration.   The drainage problem  that  would result  from  land  subsidence
only (with no  sea  level rise) approximates  the  impact  of sea  level  rise with
no land  subsidence.  The problems will be compounded if  both  sea  level rise
and land subsidence take place simultaneously.   Certainly, long-range planning
is needed to incorporate into the master  drainage  plan  a rise  in sea level in
the next 50 years.

     There are  two major types of coastal flooding  due  to  sea level  rise:
storm surge, which takes place in the vicinity of the  coast, and the backwater
effect which occurs when floodwater  from  upstream backs up along  the  river
because of a rise in water level at  the basin  outlet.    The latter effect is
observed less  and  less as one moves farther away  from the coast.   To illus-
trate the backwater effect due  to a  rise  in sea level during an extraordinary
typhoon  event  at  the  Taipei Bridge (17  km from  the coast),  results of the
computer modeling of the Tamsui River (Yen and Lin   1982) are presented.

-------
                                                   Teipei
                 Tamsui River
                                                             iwan
N
1  2  3
                                                          Km
                                                     Units:  m
       Figure 2.   Land Subsidence in Taipei  Basin,  1955-77
                  Source:   Yen et al.  1979

-------
     Typhoon  Gloria  hit the  area September  10-12,  1963.   During  the -flood,
most parts of  the  Taipei City and adjacent areas were inundated with  1-3 m of
water,  and thirty-one  lives  were  lost.   This  typhoon produced  the record
rainfall and  flooding,  which is equivalent  to  a 200-year storm event.   The
observed high  tide at  the river mouth  was  about  3 m.   Based on  this  tide
elevation and  the  200-year  river discharge (250,000 cubic meters per second),
time variation  of  river levels at the Taipei Bridge is  shown in Figure 3,  as
well as river  levels  based  on sea level  rises of 1 m and 2 m.  Sea level rise
at the river mouth of the  Tamsui River does produce a backwater effect, which
would worsen the stormwater drainage problem  in the city of Taipei.

     As shown  in Figure 3, a 30-cm  rise at  the  river mouth  would  not simply
translate to a 30-cm  rise  in  river stage  at  the Taipei Bridge.  There are a
few hydraulic  problems  associated with  the backwater effect:   Floodwater  in
the river may overtop the levee, and the levee height would have to be raised;
an increase in  river  stage  would necessitate  an  increase in head for pumping;
more and/or  larger pumps  would  have  to  be  installed;  and  pumping  capacity
would be reduced.  The backwater effect lasts for many hours.  The time period
in which gravity drainage is sufficient is shortened and pumpings must be used
more.     Although  the  flooding  caused  by  the  sea  level  rise  itself,  as
illustrated in  this example,  may not be great,  its ultimate impact (that is,
effects such as those caused by  the typhoon  Gloria) would certainly increase
the degree of flood damage.

     Cities located closer  to the coast will  experience a more severe impact
than the  city  of  Taipei  in  terms  of greater  backwater effect and  possible
storm surge threat.   As described before,  the city of Taipei would  experience
severe flood-related damage when  sea level rise  effects  are combined with the
problems of inadequate existing drainage system and land subsidence.  Houston,
Texas,  has  a  similar  land  subsidence  problem.    This  coastal  city  also  is
vulnerable  to  sea level   rise  (although to  a  lesser  extent)  and,  as  a
consequence,  will  experience similar  flood-control  and  stormwater  management
problems (Amandes  1980).

DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS OF TWO CASE STUDIES

     Precise predictions of  future sea  level rise  are  currently  not avail-
able.   Scientific  communities need  to improve the  prediction capability.   In
addition,   international  bodies, such as  the  United Nations  Environment  Pro-
gramme, need to investigate the costs and benefits of controlling emissions  of
greenhouse gases.  While they do so, local officials and engineers  in coastal
cities need  to evaluate the  implications  of  sea level  rise, so that  they  do
not inadvertently  design a  system that is  prematurely  obsolete.   Case studies
conducted in the cities of  Charleston, South  Carolina, and Fort Walton Beach,
Florida, have examined the  question of whether to design a system now based  on
a reasonable estimation of  projected sea level rise or to retrofit  the system
later after sea level  rise  has occurred.

     The residentially  and commercially developed  Grove Street watershed  in
Charleston has a drainage area of 68.4 ha.   Average surface slope is less  than
Q.5%,    Ground  elevation  ranges  from 1.52  to  3.96  m  above  mean  sea  level
(MSL),   The existing  drainage facilities,  storm  sewer  pipes and culverts,  are
undersized for  the design criteria of a  5-year storm.   To upgrade  the system,
the  master drainage  plan  was altered  to accommodate a  10-year  storm event


                                      42

-------
     iver Stage
        (M)
         12
	 2m above recorded tide

	 lm above recorded tide
     recorded tide for 200-year
     typhoon Gloria, 1963
                            12
      18
                                           24
30
                             36
                                                                Time (Hr.j
Figure 3.  River Stages at the Taipei Bridge for Various Tide Elevations
           Source:  Yen and Lin 1982

-------
(19.89 cm  rainfall in 24  hours)  and a spring-tide elevation  of 1.33 m above
MSL.   Design scenarios,  shown in  Table  1, are  based on  a  hypothetical  10%
increase in precipitation, and projection of sea level rise by Hoffman, Keyes,
and  Titus  (1983).   Various  alternatives were  explored for  each  scenario to
determine  the  most  economical system  to  provide  protection for  the design
storm.  The retrofit  alternatives  that were considered were pumping stations,
retention/detention basins, and pipe  networks.   The study  concluded that best
strategy was to  design now for a 0.32  m rise  in  sea  level (LaRoche and Webb,
Titus et al., in press).

     The Gap  Creek  watershed  in  Fort Walton  Beach  has a mixed  commercial,
industrial, and residential development; an average surface slope of 0.2$; and
a ground elevation ranging from 0.61  m to  11.28 m above MSL.   The groundwater
table  is  high   because  of  a  large  swamp situation  to  the  north of  the
watershed.   Scattered storm  sewer pipes are connected  to  the creek,  which is
the major  drainage way for the watershed.   The current  design criteria are a
25-year  storm  with  24-hour  rainfall  of 28.58 cm  and a  tide elevation  of
0.15 m.  Design scenarios are shown in Table 2.  Upgrade alternatives  included
increasing the  capacity of  present retention/detention basins, adding other
large  detention  facilities,  dredging  channels,  and floodproofing homes.   It
was  concluded  that retrofit  to the Fort  Walton Beach  drainage  system should
not  be  implemented   until  a  rise  in sea level  takes  place  (Waddell  and
Blaylock, in press; Titus et al.,  in press 1985).

     It is evident from  the  two case  studies that  whether  or not  to design a
coastal drainage  system  against  future sea level rise  primarily depends upon
the  individual  watershed of  interest.   As  a  result, planners  and  engineers
responsible  for  coastal  drainage  need to  examine the  sea level  rise  issue
during the preliminary  design and  planning  phase in  terms  of its  expected
effect on each watershed  in order  to avoid  excessive  cost  for future retrofit
of the system.

CONCLUSION

     Potential  sea level rise is an issue that scientists,  engineers,  planners
and  decision makers  worldwide need  to address in  a  joint effort.   To  avoid
excessive  damage  from coastal flooding,  plans upgrading the  existing system
and  altering  the master  drainage  plan to  account  for future sea  level rise
must  be  considered.    A  major  challenge  for  scientists is   improving  the
accuracy of  predictions  of  sea level  rise.   Information concerning design
strategies that protect drainage systems against future sea level rise and the
costs of such strategies  will  assist  researchers  and  decision makers through-
out the world who are trying to determine the benefits of decreasing emissions
of greenhouse gases in order  to reduce global warming and thus the  rise in sea
level.
                                      44

-------
Table 1.   Design Scenarios for the Grove Street Watershed



A.


B.


C.



D.




Scenario
Current Sea Level
and Climate Conditions

Low Sea level Rise
and Current Climate
Conditions
Low Sea Level Rise
and Ten Percent
Increase in Design
Storm Precipitation
High Sea Level Rise
and Current Climate
Conditions


Year
1980
2025
2075
1980
2025
2075
1980
2025
2075

1980
2025
2075
Sea
Level
Rise
(m)
0
0
0
0
0,32
1,04
0
0,32
1.04

0
0.45
1.49
Table 2. Design Scenarios for the




A.


B.


C.



D,





Scenario
Current Sea Level
and Climate Conditions

Low Sea level Rise
and Current Climate
Conditions
Low Sea Level Rise
and Ten Percent
Increase in Design
Storm Precipitation
High Sea Level Rise
and Current Climate
Conditions



Year
1984
2025
2075
1984
2025
2075
1984
2025
2075

1984
2025
2075
Sea
Level
Rise
(m)
0
0
0
0
0.32
1.04
0
0.32
1.04

0
0.45
1.49
1984
Tide
Elevation
(m)
1.33
1.33
1.33
1.33
1.33
1.33
1.33
1.33
1.33

1.33
1.33
U33
Gap Creek
Base
Tide
Elevation
(m)
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15

0.15
0.15
0.15
Design
Elevation
(m)
1.33
1.33
1.33
1.33
1.65
2.37
1.33
1.65
2.37

1.33
1.78
2.82
Watershed

Design
Elevation
(m)
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.47
1.19
0.15
0.47
1.19

0.15
0.60
1.64
Design
Storm
Depth
(cm)
19.89
19.89
19.89
19.89
19.89
19.89
21.89
21.89
21.89

19.89
19.89
19.89

Design
Storm
Precipi-
tation(cm)
28.58
28.58
28.58
28.58
28.58
28.58
31.44
31.44
31.44

28.58
28.58
28.58
                            45

-------
REFERENCES

Amandes, C.  1980.  Effects  of subsidence on stream  hydraulics.   In Urban stormwatej*
     management in  coastal  areas,  ed. C.  Y.  Kuo.   New York:   American Society of
     Civil Engineers.

Hoffman, J.S.,  D.  Keyes,  and J.G. Titus.  1983.   Projecting  future  sea level rise,
     GPO #055-000-0236-3.   Washington, D.C.:  Government Printing Office.

Kuo, C.Y.  1984.   Some hydraulic  problems  related to stormwater  drainage design in
     coastal areas.   In  Proceedings  of  the southeastern conference  on theoretical
     and applied mechanics.   Auburn University, Alabama.

Kuo, C.Y. 1986.  Sea level  rise and  coastal stormwater  drainage.  In Proceedings oj
     the Water Forum '86.   New York:   American Society of Civil Engineers.

LaRoche, T.B.,  and M.K.  Webb.    Impact of  sea level  rise  on  stormwater  drainage
     systems in the Charleston,  South Carolina, Area.  In Sea level rise and coastal
     drainage systems.   Washington, D.C.:   U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, in
     press.

Public Works  Department,  City of Taipei 1980.   Assessment of the storm sewer pipe
     system, City of Taipei.  Bureau of New Projects,  (in Chinese).

Public  Works  Department,  City  of Taipei  1982.    A briefing  for urban stormwater
     management workshop.   Bureau  of Maintenance,  (in Chinese).

Titus  J.G.,  C.Y.  Kuo, M.J.  Gibbs,  T.B.   LaRoche,  M.K.  Webb,   and J.O.  Waddell.
     Greenhouse effect, sea level rise  and coastal  drainage systems.    Journal of
     Water Resources, (American Society of  Civil Engineers),  in press.

Waddell, J.O., and  R.A. Blaylock.   Impact of  sea level  rise  on  Gap  Creek watershed
     in  the Fort  Walton  Beach,  Florida,   Area.    In  Sea  level  rise   and  coastal
     drainage systems.   Washington, D.C.:   U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency, in
     press.

Yen, C.L., et al. 1979.  A study on the influence of land subsidence on the capacity
     of drainage system in Taipei,  Research Report No.  HY 6805.  Department of Civil
     Engineering, National Taiwan  University,  Taipei,  (in Chinese).

Yen, C.L.,  and J.L. Lin.    1982.   Tidal hydraulics  of the Tamsui  River,  Research
     Report  No.  HY  7104.     Department  of  Civil  Engineering,  National  Taiwan
     University, Taipei,   (in Chinese).
                                        46

-------
 The Sea Also Rises:
 The Ongoing Dialogue of the Dutch with the Sea

 Tom Goemans
 SIBAS Joint Institute for Policy Analysis
 Delft, Netherlands
INTRODUCTION

     The Netherlands belongs to the alluvial  coastal region of the North Sea,
which means that the western and  northwestern part of the country was formed
by alluvial deposits.  The rivers  Rhine, Meuse, and Schedule flow through the
country and out  into the North Sea (Figure 1).  Together they built and shaped
the land with  regular flooding.

     The first efforts  to protect this country can be traced back to the 3rd
century B.C.,  when people  built  mounds to live on. During  the  Roman period
these mounds were  linked  by  elevated roads; dikes were also constructed along
some  rivers.  By  the  13th  century, there was  a  more organized way  of  dike
building,  not  only in  a  defensive way  but  also  in a more  offensive  way  to
reclaim land from  the sea (Figure  2).   Any excess water could flow out of the
Polders during low  tide period through sluices, which were closed during high
tide.  Both  land  subsidence and  rising sea  level  made  artificial  drainage
necessary,  at  first by means of  windmills,  later  by steam-driven  pumps,  and
today by electric  pumps.   The  height  of  the  dikes  was based on  the  highest
Previous flood level.   It is  hardly  surprising that most of  the  previously
"Declaimed  land was frequently lost again; but every time the  people fought
back.  It is said that the Dutch  have had a  constant  dialogue with  the  sea.
(See Bruun, this volume,   for  additional  discussion of the history of shore
Protection.)

     The history of The Netherlands is marked  with storm surge disasters.   The
first known disaster occurred in  the year  1287  and hit the whole  country,
drowning fifty-thousand people.   In recent history,  major floods  occurred  in
the  years  1877,  1881,  1883, 1889, 1894,  1906, 1916,  and  finally the  most
recent one  in  1953. During  the night  of  February  1,  1953,  storm surges  of
unprecedented  height  hit   the  southwestern coastal  region (called the  Delta
region because of the major rivers). Dikes  were seriously damaged over a total


                                    47

-------
Figure  1.  The  Netherlands  in  MW-Europe
          Areas Reclaimed from
          the Sea since 1200
                Figure 2.
                    48

-------
length of  190  km.   Through  89 breaches  in the  dikes,  150,000  hectares of
polderland were inundated (Figure 3) causing  the death of 1835 people.  Total
losses were  estimated  at some  2  billion guilders (one billion  U.S.  dollars)
measured in 1953 currency.

     Once areas below  sea level are  flooded  they remain inundated  after the
flood has  retreated.   As the  tide  flows in  and  out  through  breaches in the
dikes, it widens them further.   Fertile farmlands  are then covered with marine
sands, and  salt penetrates  the soil. The only  way to return  to  normal  is to
repair the dikes and pump the  inundated  areas dry,  after  which it still takes
several years for the land to recover.

PROTECTION STRATEGY

     In  reaction  to the  1953  disaster,  the Dutch  government embarked  on  a
massive building program, the  Delta plan.   A special  committee  was  given the
task of establishing a design philosophy for the sea defenses along the coast.
In the work of  this  committee  two central  issues  were addressed: (1) shorten-
ing  the  coastline  by closing  off  the estuaries in  the Delta region  and (2)
choosing  the  design  water  level   for  the  country's  system  of  the  sea
defenses.  In this paper only the second issue is  addressed.

     With respect  to the design water  level  the committee  used  a philosophy
introduced in 1939 by the Dutch hydraulic engineer Wemelsfelder.   He analyzed
the  probability of exceedance  of  storm surge  levels  along  the  coast of the
Netherlands and  presented probability exceedance  lines, using a  linear scale
for the water level and a logarithmic scale for  frequencies of occurrence. Due
to the tidal  system  of the North Sea, the tidal amplitude varies from 1 to 4
meters along  the  coast,  and for each location  a separate  exceedance line can
be constructed  (Figure 4).  By setting an acceptable probability of exceedance
it is possible to establish a design water level.

     The 1953 storm surge had an annual probability of 1:250, corresponding to
a surge  level of about  +4  m in the  disaster area.    The  committee  concluded
that  the entire coast  of the  country  was  inadequately protected and recom-
mended strengthening of  the main sea  defense  structures.  Considering the high
economic  value  of  the  central part  of the country  (major industrial  and
agricultural  areas,  large population in metropolitan  areas),  the probability
of exceedance was  set  at 1:10,000.  The  corresponding  water  level was derived
from an extrapolation of the exceedance lines; this resulted in a design water
level  of +5m.   For coastal  areas  north  and  south  of central  Holland,  the
committee used  lower design water  levels  (corresponding  'to a probability of
1:4,000)  because  the area  protected has  a  system  of secondary  dikes  which
limits any flood disaster there to smaller sections.

     A dike that has to resist a  water  level of +5 m must be much higher than
5m,  mainly  because waves can  run  up and overtop  the dike.   Other  phenomena
taken  into  account  are seiches  and  gust  bumps,   settlement   of  the  dike
material,  and  sea  level  rise for  the  next  century.     Adding  all  these
contributions together results  in design criteria for all sea defenses; since
                                      49

-------
                                                                     Dark iriis indi-
                                                                     cate flooding
                                                                     NETHERLANDS
                                                                      GERMANY
                                                                      BELGIUM
            Figure 3.   Flooded Area During the  1953  Disaster
I
      103    102     10
1
                                                            EXTRAPOLATED
                                  MEASURED
                                                              r
                          10~1    10~2    10~3    1CT4    10~*    10"*  n 10~T

                                    probability of exceedance par year

Figure 4.   Storm  Surge  Water  Levels  for  Hoek  van HoJland
                                      50

-------
the publication  of the  committee's  final report  in  1962 this  is  called the
Delta level. For a typical dike the following figures are representative:

                  Storm surge level              5.00 m above MSL
                  Wave runup
                  Seiches and gust bumps
                  Sea level rise
                  Settlement

                  Total Height                  15.75 m

     The core of  the  typical dike is made of sand,  covered  with a  clay layer
1  m thick. The sea side  of  the  dike  is  normally also covered with asphalt and
large stone blocks.  The  outer  slope  is 1:5,  the inner slope, 1:3 (Figure 5).
The Netherlands  has  about 400  km  of sea dikes  in addition to  the  200 km of
dunes, all of which require  constant  and  careful  maintenance [totals mainten-
ance cost is presently about  70 million guilders  (U.S.  $35 million)].  If the
country was  not  protected  against the sea,  more than half  of it  would be
uninhabitable (Figure 6).  About 8 million people live in the protected area.

IMPACT OF SEA LEVEL RISE

     The Dutch coast is  part  of a  longer  coastline stretching from Belgium to
Germany and Denmark.   Some of the problems experienced in The Netherlands also
apply  to  small parts  of these other countries.   This paper,  however,  only
covers the Dutch situation.

Tides

     The  tidal  system  for  the  North  Sea  is  rather  complex  with  several
amphidromic  points.    Simulation  runs  with  a two-dimensional water movement
model for the North Sea  and  the continental  shelf show that these amphidromic
points might move as  a result of mean  sea level  rise.   For  most of the Dutch
coast this  would  mean  an increase of the tidal  amplitude and of the relative
high-water level.  This phenomenon may be supported by past measurements along
the  Dutch  coast.   Whereas  for  the  period   1933-1984  the  mean   sea  level
increased approximately 0.18 m per century,  the tidal amplitude increased 0.25
m  and  the high-water level 0.30 m per  century.   Similar  data were  found for
the coast of northwestern Germany.

Changes in Storm Surge Level

     Water surges  into the North Sea during storms.   Calculations  have shown
that even for  a mean sea level rise of 5 m the water setup  does not increase
significantly for a given wind  field.   From  this one might conclude—in first
approximation—that the exceedance line as shown in Figure 4 moves to the left
when  mean  sea level  rises.   The  protection level  of the  present  sea dikes
decreases when  the  sea level rises;   Figure 7  shows this relation for central
Holland.   It- is, however,  by  no means  certain  that  storm tracks  and wind
fields  will  stay the  same  when  the  climate  changes.    The  shape  of the
exceedance  lines might,  therefore,  change  as  they move  to the left.   Wave
characteristics may also change.
                                      51

-------
                                       1970
                          1930
MSL
        T  '
       Figure 5.  Cross  Section  of a Typical  Dike  in  Various  Years
                      .	.  Areas Presently Protected by Dikes
                      [	!  Against Floods and High Tides
                                  Figure 6.
                                      52

-------
        o
        o
        a
        •Q
        O
        a
        = 0
        3 S
        a 2
        A a.
        O •_
        aS
                           0.5
2.0
                                 mean sea level rise, m
                                  Figure 7.
Changes in Saltwater Intrusion
     The  tide  penetrates  into  the country  through  rivers  flowing  into the
North Sea,  which  means that during high water, salinity will  increase for a
certain point along the river.   As a  result  of mean sea level rise, saltwater
intrusion will be felt further upstream,  but only  when the river bed does not
change.  Due to sedimentation the flow cross section will tend to come back to
the original one.  We  believe  that the increased saltwater intrusion will not
be a major  problem for a  sea level rise of up to 2 m.  Occasionally, however,
the availability of fresh water for agricultural purposes may be reduced.

Changes in Saltwater Seepage

     The  difference  between  the seawater   level  and  the  groundwater and
surface-water level in the country determines the  amount of seepage.   At this
moment the western and northern part of the Netherlands suffers from saltwater
seepage.   In order to keep surface-water salinity  in the polders acceptably
low, a certain amount  of  fresh water  is needed to flush  the canal  system.   As
a  first  approximation, a  sea  level rise of  1 m would require  ]Q% more  water
for flushing; a sea level rise of 2  m would  require  2Q%.  In times of  drought
                                      53

-------
it is not certain that this amount of water will be available; economic losses
in the agricultural sector could be the result.  In any case saltwater seepage
will  be  felt  further east  in the  country,  which  makes  water  management—
already a complex problem in the Netherlands—more difficult.

     The freshwater bubble under the dune area will not be directly threatened
by an increasing  seawater  level, unless  the  dunes  are narrow.   The  dunes
provide a substantial part of the  drinking water needed in the country.

Morphological Changes

     Part of the Dutch coast consists of dunes, varying in height between 10 m
and 40 m above mean  sea  level.  At some locations the coast line is advancing
(about 40 m in the past 100 years), but at most locations it is retreating (up
to 100 m).   Any sea level rise will  result in erosion of  the  dune area; the
retreat may be  on  the order  of 100-200 m for a mean  sea  level  rise of 1-2 m.
At some  places  the dune  area  is  narrow and  low,  which means  that dangerous
situations could  develop.   At  other  places the dunes  are  more that  2,000 m
wide, providing more than ample protection.

     In the north  of the country  the Wadden  Islands  are continuously moving:
retreating at  the  North  Sea side  and advancing at the  Wadden  Sea (landward)
side.  Hence  they are slowly migrating  to the mainland.   Any  sea level rise
will accelerate this trend.   In the Wadden Sea sedimentation will diminish and
intertidal areas  will decrease;  this may have  serious consequences  for the
population of wetland  birds.   The estuaries in  the southwestern  parts of the
country will experience a large tidal  volume  with  rising sea level, resulting
in erosion  of  the  gullies.    Here  as  well,   there  will  be  a reduction  of
intertidal areas,  which   will  adversely affect  the  bird  population. If sea
level  stabilizes  at  a higher   level  for  a  few centuries,  the wetlands may
eventually return.  However Thomas (this volume) and  others indicate that sea
level is likely to continue rising.

Changes in River Water Level

     The water level  for  the rivers flowing into  the North Sea will increase
with the sea  level,  and  because the Netherlands is so  flat this  will be felt
far upstream.  The following are some of the impacts we can  expect:

     •  River dikes,  protecting against  inundation  at high  discharge rates,
        will be  too  low  for the  required  protection level  (presently set at
        1/1,250) especially in  the western part of the country.

     •  Clearance for  fixed  bridges  will decrease and hamper ship traffic on
        the rivers.

     •  Drainage of  the  low-lying polders  will be more  difficult,  requiring
        more energy and modification of pumping systems.

     •  A decision will  have to be made about  the water  level  for Lake Yssel
        (a 1,200 sq.  km  freshwater lake  created in 1983 by  building a barrier
        dam to shut the lake off from the North Sea).

-------
     •   Harbor facilities along  the rivers  and  especially at  the  coast—the
        port of Rotterdam is  the  largest in the world—will  need adjustments
        to the higher water  level.

     •   Shipping  locks  and  discharge  sluices   will  have  to  be  rebuilt,
        especially for a water-level rise of more than 1 m.

REACTION TO SEA LEVEL RISE

     From  the preceding  paragraphs  it will  be  clear  that  the  protection
against  the  sea  is  an  anchorpoint   in  Dutch  politics.    Throughout  the
centuries,  a relatively  large amount of  money  has  been  spent on  defense
structures and on  water management.   On the basis  of the value of  the area
protected, a safety level has been chosen;  construction is still going on, but
around 1990  the  required  safety  level for the whole country  will be  reached.
An expected  sea level  rise of 0.25 m for the next 100 years  is  taken into
account.

     Any  sea level  rise  in  excess  of  that  value  will  result  in a reduced
actual safety  level.   There  is no  reason  to assume that  the  government will
not stick  to the present protection  policy;  hence the dikes will  have to be
heightened.  In first approximation this will cost:

         Mean Sea Level Rise                       Expenditures

                05m                          5 billion guilders
                                                 (U.S. $2.2 billion)
                10m                         10 billion guilders
                                                 (U.S. $4.4 billion)
                2.0 m                         20 billion guilders
                                                 (U.S. $8.8 billion)

     About  60$  of these expenditures are needed  for the dikes and dunes, 30%
for  the water  management,  and  10$ for rivers  and  ports.   Dikes will most
probably  be  heightened in steps of  0.5 m,  each step requiring a minimum of 20
years of  construction  time  for the country as a whole.  In the extreme case of
a  2 m  rise in 100 years,  this means a yearly expenditure of approximately 250
million guilders  (U.S.  $100 million),  which is somewhat less than 0.1 percent
of the  Dutch GNP.   For the  less extreme cases, more time  is available for one
step and  the yearly  costs will correspondingly be lower.

     From the  above  data  it may  be  concluded that  there  is no  need for
anticipation.   That  is,  we  can  keep  up  with sea  level even  it  rises more
rapidly  than the  present  rate.   The  scenario  of  a  2-m rise  in  100 years,
however,  results in a critical situation;  almost immediately after detection,
actions would be required.   It is not at all certain  that decision makers act
that  fast;  in this  respect the energy  crises of 1973 and  1978 and  the acid
rain  issue are good lessons.  Even more relevant  is the  fact that  the  present
flood-protection  strategy of the  Netherlands came about only after the  tragic
disaster  of 1953 occurred.    When nobody can remember a specific disaster,  it
is extremely difficult to obtain consensus on countermeasures.   The conclusion
must  be that monitoring the  sea  level change is extremely important  in  order
to detect "the  signal" as early as  possible.   In  addition,  it would be wise  to
start  thinking  about the decision-making process  that  will follow detection  of
an accelerated  rate of sea  level rise.

                                       55

-------
     Considering  the  position  of  the  Netherlands  in northwestern  Europe,
multilateral cooperation with the border countries Belgium and Germany will be
necessary.  This brings us to the fact that the impacts of sea level rise will
be unequally  distributed among  countries in  the world.   No country  with a
coastline can  escape from the phenomenon  once it unfolds.   Yet  it  is not a
natural but a  manmade phenomenon;  it  presents a  perfect  example of external
costs, that is  costs not included  in  the  present price of energy from fossil
fuel  burning.    Hence the  question of  compensation  payments  may  come  up—
especially  in  the poorer countries—not  only because of sea level  rise but
also  in  the  broader  context  of climate  change.   Much  will  depend  on how
international  relations develop in the next century.

     Whereas the  impacts  of  sea  level rise are mostly negative,  there may be
one positive point, at least for  the Dutch.   The  Delta Plan included not only
heightening of  dikes, but also  closing off  estuaries with  the  objective to
shorten  the  coastline.     This   provided  a  unique  opportunity  for  Dutch
contractors,  consultants,  and   research   institutes   to   gain  experience  in
innovative hydraulic  engineering.   Skills and knowledge are  applied all  over
the world.   A  rising sea  level may  provide a  new  global  market  for  this
expertise.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

     The  author  is   grateful  for  the use  of data  and  internal  memoranda
provided  by the  Ministry of  Transport  and  Public  Works and  by  the  State
Geological  Service  in the Netherlands.    However,  the opinions  set  forth in
this paper are solely those of the author.
                                      56

-------
Planning for Sea Level Rise Under Uncertainty:
A Case Study of Charleston, South Carolina
Michael Gibbs
ICF Incorporated
Washington, DC USA
ABSTRACT

     The Charleston, South Carolina,  area  could be significantly affected  by
accelerated sea level rise caused by global warming.   Preparing for this rise
by building protective structures or  adapting to the  changing environment  by
altering investment patterns  can eliminate most  of  the adverse impacts.   This
case study of  the  Charleston  area  demonstrates that  in  some  areas  actions
should be taken today,  despite  the current uncertainty surrounding the future
rate of sea level rise,  while  for  other  areas  it  is better to  wait  for the
resolution of uncertainty  before taking actions.

SEA LEVEL RISE:  A NEW FACTOR TO CONSIDER  IN COASTAL PLANNING

     People  throughout  the  world  exploit  coastal  resources  to  provide many
diverse services.  In the  United States we  are balancing the  competing demands
on this sensitive environment through coastal zone management programs.  A new
factor to consider in managing  coastal zones is a rapid rise  in the global sea
level.  Although rises  and falls in  sea level are not new,  the impending rapid
rate of rise is a significant  departure from recent trends.  Adapting  to  it
will be an important new challenge for coastal planners.

     Over the next 50 to  100 years,  global  sea level may rise at a much faster
rate than historical global and local rates.   Waiting to  observe the effects
(e.g.,  erosion  and inundation)  before  responding  to them may  not  be  a
satisfactory  management  strategy because  damages  may occur too  rapidly  to
allow for effective responses.  However, planning  ahead for  sea  level rise is
difficult because  of the considerable  uncertainty regarding how rapidly the
global sea level may rise.   Only recently have scientists  begun to quantify
the potential for sea level  rise and precise estimates are  not yet available.
                                    57

-------
     Should planners wait until better estimates  of sea level rise are avail-
able, or should they identify options and act now?  This paper addresses these
questions using a case studv of the  potential  economic impacts on portions of
Charleston, South Carolina.    It examines  planning options  available  to the
city and quantifies  the implications of alternative planning strategies.

     Four sea level  rise scenarios (shown in Table 1) were drawn from a recent
EPA report for this  analysis (Hoffman, Keyes, and Titus 1983).  The baseline


     Table 1. Potential Future Relative Sea  Level  Rise  in Charleston,
              South  Carolina [in Centimeters (Feet)j

Sea Level Rise Scenario
Baseline
Low
Medium
High

1980
0
0
0
0
YEAR
2025
11 (0.4)
28 (0.9)
46 (1.5)
64 (2.1)

2075
24 (0.8)
88 (2.9)
159 (5.2)
232 (7.6)
scenario,  24 cm by 2075,  assumes a continuation of the recent historical rates
of relative sea  level  rise in the Charleston  area  (this  scenario is unlikely
and is viewed  as a lower bound); the low and  medium  scenarios,  88 cm and 159
cm by  2075,  represent the likely range  of future sea  level rise;  the high
scenario of  232  cm  is used  as  an  upper bound.  Although the  analysis only
covers the period up to 2075,  the global  sea level is expected to continue to
rise beyond that time.

THE CASE STUDY AREA

     The Charleston area consists of  the  land  around  Charleston  Harbor, which
is formed  by  the confluence  of the Cooper,  Ashley, and  Wando  Rivers (see
Figure 1).   Included in this  area are the  peninsula portion of  the city of
Charleston,  portions of  the  city of  Charleston  in West  Ashley and James
Island, portions of the city of  North Charleston,  the towns of Mount Pleasant
and Sullivans  Island, and  unincorporated  portions  of  Charleston  County.  This
analysis  focuses on  two  portions of  the  study  area:    the  peninsula  and
Sullivans Island.

     The peninsula has a maximum elevation  of  up to 10 meters (33 feet) above
mean sea level and  includes several  low-lying areas  that have been reclaimed
from  the harbor.  The  only major flood protection structure, the Battery, is
 ' The Charleston case  study  analysis presented in  this  paper is an extension!
  of the analysis described in Gibbs (1984).


                                      58

-------
                      DANIEL
                        tsland
                               ..--•:;-'•'  MT. PLEASANT
          L-CHARLESTO
             eninsula
 WES
ASHLEYx:
JAMES
Island
             Figure 1.  Charleston Study Area
                          59

-------
located at  the southern  end of  the  peninsula.   This seawall  has a maximum
elevation of six feet above mean sea level.

     Property values on the peninsula exceed $875 million (1980 dollars).  The
southern end  of the peninsula  has  a densely  populated  historic district and
other residential, commercial, and port areas.  The central peninsula consists
of industrial parks and marshland,  and  the upper peninsula (North Charleston)
has a combination  of  residential areas and  industry,  including a large naval
reservation.  Because  most of the peninsula  is already  highly developed, its
potential for growth  is   limited.    Some shifts  in  land  use  are expected,
primarily to more high-density development.

     Sullivans Island is a narrow barrier island with an average elevation of
less than 3 meters above  sea  level.   A  residential  and  resort community, it
has been developed with single-family homes.  Its zoning regulations currently
prohibit high-rise and  condominium  construction.    Current  property  values
total approximately $65 million (1980 dollars).

Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise

     The peninsula  is  the  portion of the  Charleston  area least vulnerable to
sea level rise.   It is currently protected by the Battery at the southern end,
and  its port  facilities  provide  stabilization.    While  the peninsula  has
various  low-lying  areas   threatened  by   inundation   and  erosion,  its  high
development   density will  likely make  protection of the areas  economically
justified.

     Sullivans  Island,  on  the  other  hand,  is  a low-lying barrier  island of
highly erodable materials.   Exposed to open-ocean wave attack, it is extremely
vulnerable  to sea  level  rise.   The low-  to  medium-density  development on the
island  may  be  insufficient  to make  protection with  a  sea  wall  economical.
Additionally, the substantial recreational value of  its  beaches would be lost
if a sea wall were built.

     Table  2  shows the potential economic impact of  sea level  rise on these
two areas.     For  each area, estimates  are shown for  all four  sea  level rise
scenarios.    First, the estimate  of the  economic  value  for  each scenario is
shown.   This value indicates the level of economic activity that will go on in
the study area between 1980 and 2075.   For example, in the peninsula area, the
economic value  is  estimated at  $2.21  to   $2.27  billion  in  the low  sea level
rise scenario.

     The second column in Table 2 shows the  change in economic value from the
baseline scenario.   This  change in  economic  value   is   the  estimate  of  the
impact of the sea  level  rise scenario.    The  last  column  displays  this impact
as a percent of the baseline economic value estimate.
  Economic impacts include the value of shorelines movement due to erosion and
  inundation,  increased storm damage, and changes in investment patterns.  The
  method used  to estimate economic impacts is described in Gibbs (1984).


                                      60

-------
     Table 2.   Potential Economic Impacts of Sea Level Rise on the Charleston
               Peninsula and Sullivans Island:   1980 to 2075a
   Area
Sea Level
  Rise
Scenario
 Estimate of
Economic Value
(millions of
1980 dollars)
  Estimate of
Economic Impact
 (millions of
1980 dollars)
  Estimate of
Economic Impact
   (percent
 of baseline
economic value)
Charleston
Peninsula
Sullivans
Island
Baseline

Low
Medium
High

Baseline

Low
Medium

High
    2,520

2,210 - 2,270
1,770 - 1,870
1,435 - 1,550
                              85
                              40
      150

      • 115
      • 90
                              27 - 75
                                                250 - 310
                                                650 - 750
                                                970 -1,085
     35 - 65
     60 - 110

     75 - 125
                      10
                      26
                      38
   23
   60
   40
   50
        12
        30
        43
43
110
73
83
a  Estimates  represent  impacts of  sea  level rise  in the absence  of actions
   taken to respond to sea level rise.  All estimates are present values eval-
   uated at a three percent real rate of discount.
     The range of impacts shown in Table 2 (e.g., $250 to $310 million for the
low scenario  on  the peninsula) reflects a range  of assumptions regarding how
investment patterns change in  response  to  sea  level rise.   The upper bound of
the economic  impact estimate assumes that people incorporate the potential for
sea  level rise  very  slowly  into  their  decision  making.    The  lower  bound
assumes   that  people   immediately   alter  their   investment  patterns   in
anticipation  of  future sea level  rise.   The  actual  investment behavior will
likely fall within this range.

     The estimates  in  Table 2  do  not incorporate community  protection systems
such as  levees,  sea  walls,  zoning  ordinances,  or beach stabilization.   The
magnitude of  the impacts indicate  that such community  responses  may be war-
ranted.    The impacts are  expected  to  be  large,  both  in  absolute  terms
(hundreds of  millions  of dollars) and  in  relative  terms (a large fraction of
the economic  activity  in the study  area will  be affected).  The question is:
what actions  should be taken now, given current uncertainties about the future
rate of sea level rise?  To answer this question, the benefits of a variety of
actions in each of the two areas are evaluated below.
                                      61

-------
EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE PROTECTION STRATEGIES

     To  evaluate  whether  it  is  preferred  to  act  now  (and  invest  funds to
protect areas from potential  future  sea level rise) or to wait (and act later
when the  rate  of sea level  rise can be projected  with  greater precision), a
series of protection strategies  for the peninsula and for  Sullivans Island
were examined.    Each  of  the strategies was evaluated across the  range of
potential rates of sea level rise.

     On the one hand, acting now runs the risks of

     •  Under-Protecting — sea level rise turns out to be more extensive  than
        expected,  and too little protection was provided

     •  Over-Protection — sea level rise turns  out to be  less extensive  than
        expected,   and  too  much  protection  was provided,  at  too great an
        expense.

     Waiting for more precise estimates of sea level rise runs the risks of

     •  Being unable to respond  rapidly enough  if the sea  level rises rapidly
        in the future

     •  Making  investments  in structures today  that  are subsequently  lost to
        the sea.

     The tradeoffs among these risks, and the ability to make decisions today
(in the  face of uncertainty), depend  on the sensitivity of  the  decisions to
the rate of  sea level rise.   If  the  same decision  (i.e., protection strategy)
is  preferred regardless  of  the  future rate  of  sea level  rise, then  the
decision can be made today.   Alternatively,  if the preferred decision is  very
sensitive to the expected rate,  then improved estimates  of sea level rise may
be required before making a decision.

Protection Strategies for Charleston Peninsula

     While  a variety of  protective measures can  reduce  the  impacts  of  sea
level  rise  on the  peninsula,  this  analysis  focuses  on   the  most  likely
response, resource construction  of a sea wall or  levee  around the peninsula.
The sea  wall would  stop  shoreline  retreat as  well as protect against storm
surge.  It would  cost about  $150 million (1980 dollars),  based on a unit  cost
of  approximately  $6,500 per  meter  ($2,000  per  foot)  over  the  22.5  km  (11
miles) of coastline.   Operating and maintaining the seawall structure may  cost
about  1   percent  of  the  original  costs,  or  $1.5 million  per  year.    The
questions here  are whether  to  build it, when  to  build  it,  and how  high to
build it.

     Three options for protection of the peninsula were examined:

     •  Option  1;    Crash  Construction  Program.    A  protective  structure is
        built as  rapidly  as  possible.   For  this  evaluation,  the  completion
        date is set  at 1990.   The height of the structure  is  assumed to be
        sufficient to protect from a 90-cm (3-ft) sea level rise.
                                      62

-------
     •  Option 2:   Routine Construction  Program.   A protective  structure is
        built over the next 30 years, with a completion date set at 2020.  The
        structure is assumed  to  be sufficient to protect  from a 90-cm (3-ft)
        sea level rise.

     •  Option 3;  Delayed Construction.  Planning for the construction of the
        structure is delayed  until precise estimates of the  expected  rate of
        sea level rise  are obtained.   A.  completion date  is  set for 2050, and
        the height of the  structure  is  assumed  to be  appropriate for the rate
        of sea level rise that is identified in the  future.

     The  benefits  of   each  of  the options  relative  to doing  nothing  are
presented  in  Table 3  for each  of the  four  sea level  rise scenarios.   For
example, if the low scenario comes true, the economic value of the development
over time  is  estimated at $2,210  to $2,270 million assuming  no  structure is
built.    If  Option 1,  Crash Program, is  implemented,  it  is estimated  that the
economic value would increase  by $830 to $770 million.  This  increase is due
to reduced shoreline retreat and reduced  storm damage.   From this increase is
subtracted the present  value  of  the cost of the  program,  $400 million.3   The
net increased  value over no structure  is consequently $430  to $370  million.
Finally, the  economic  value  of  the  development  in  the area  assuming  the low
scenario comes true and Option  1  is performed is estimated  at approximately
$2.640 million ($2,210  + $430 and $2,270 +  $370).   The values  for the other
scenario/protection option combinations are interpreted similarly.

     The information in Table 3  provides  considerable  insight into strategies
for preparing for sea level rise.   It  shows  that  doing nothing is inferior to
the other options across all  the  scenarios.   Therefore,  the sea wall should be
built.   Similarly, delaying construction  to 2050  is  inferior,  meaning  that it
should be built sooner, rather than  later.   Table 3  also shows that Options 1
and 2  have considerable  value  and  can  offset most  of  the adverse  economic
impacts of a rise in sea level.
  The costs of the options are computed as follows:

        •  Option 1:  — Construction cost - $150 million
                      — Present value of operating  and maintenance costs of
                         $1.5 million per year at a  3 percent discount rate
                         equals $50 million
                      — Shadow price of the investment equals 2.0
                      — Present value of the cost at a 3 percent discount
                         rate equals:  (2.0) x (150  + 50) = $400 million.

        •  Option 2:  The cost of Option 1, $400 million, delayed by 30 years
                      at a 3 percent discount rate equals:
                      400 * (1.03)30 = $165 million.

        •  Option 3:  The cost of Option 1, $400 million, delayed by 60 years
                      at a 3 percent discount rate equals: 400 * (1.03)*** =
                      $70 million.
                                      63

-------
Table 3.  Estimates of the Economic Value of the Development in the
          Charleston Peninsula Area for Three Protective Options
          (millions of 1980 dollars)



1.

2.

3.

Protection Options
No Structure
— Economic Va lue
Crash Construction Program
— Increased Economic Value over
No Structure
— Increased Value Net of $400 million
cost
— Economic va lue
Routine .Construction Program
— Increased Economic Value over
No Structure
— Increased Value Net of $165 million
cost
— Economic Value
Delay Construction
— Increased Economic Value over
No Structure
— Increased Value Net of $70 million
cost
— Economic Va lue

Base 1 i ne

2,520

570
170
2,690

380
215
2,735

190
120
2,640
Sea Leve
Low
-
2,210
-
830
U30
2,640

600
485
2,645

320
250
2,640

- 2,270

- 770
- 370
- 2,640

- 550
- 385
- 2,655

- 290
- 220
- 2,490
Rise Scenarios
Medi

1,770 -

1, 100 -
700 -
2,470 -

800 -
635 -
2,405 -

380 -
310 -
2,080 -
urn

1,870

1 ,030
630
2,500

750
585
2,455

350
280
2, 150
Hi

1,435

1,090
690
2, 125

870
705
2, 140

460
390
1,825
qh

- 1,550

- 1,040
- 640
- 2, 190

- 810
- 645
- 2, 195

- 420
- 350
- 1,900

-------
                         Table 4.  Coranunity Protection Options  Examined
                                    for Sullivans Island
           Option
                Description
   Present Value of Cost   a./
 (millions of I960 dollars)
 1.  Beach Nourishment -  1990
 2.  Beach Nourishment - 2020
 3. Beach  Nourishment - 2050
Initiate in 1990 a beach nourishment pro-
gram to stabilize the beach face and build
dunes.  Included in the program is the
construction of a levee to stabilize the
backside of the island bordering the
intracoastal waterway.

Initiate in 2020 a beach nourishment pro-
gram to stabilize the beach face at its
2020 position and build dunes.  Included
in the program is the construction of a
levee to stabilize the backside of the
island bordering the  intracoastal
waterway.

Initiate in 2050 a beach nourishment pro-
gram to stabilize the beach face at its
2050 position and build dunes.  Included
in the program is the construction of a
levee to stabilize the backside of the
island bordering the  intracoastal
waterway.  (Not applicable for the high
SLR scenario.)
Beach Nourishment:  $40 to
$200 million, depending on SLR
scenario.

Backside Stabilization:  $31
mi 11 ion.

Beach Nourishment:  $31 to
$160 million, depending on SLR
scenario.

Backside Stabilization:  $13
million.
Beach Nourishment:  $20 to $72
million, depending on SLR
scenario.

Backside Stabilization:  $5
mill ion.
  . Stop  Investment -  1990
5. Stop  Investment - 2020-
Prohibit future investment on Sullivans
Island following 1990.  Repair of storm
damage and construction of protective
structures would be prohibited.

Prohibit future investment on Sullivans
Island following 2020.  Repair of storm
damage and construction of protective
structures would be prohibited.
No direct costs.
No direct costs.
a/ Present values estimated at real discount rate of three percent.

-------
     The  results for  Options  1  and  2  are very  close.    While Option  2  is
preferred to Option  1  for  the  baseline,  low,  and high scenarios, the opposite
is  true  for the medium  scenario.   This pattern  of  preferences is reasonable
because:  (1)  in  the  baseline and low scenarios,  losses  are very small in the
early years, so waiting does not cause large losses; (2) the assumed 90-cm (3-
ft) rise provides insufficient protection for the high scenario, so rushing  to
completion has little  value if the sea wall  is  built  to protect from a 90-cm
rise and  the high scenario  comes  true;  and  (3)  Option  2 provides protection
for the  medium scenario for a  substantial  period of time.   Therefore,  it  is
probably better  to proceed with a routine  construction  schedule and a target
completion  date  of  2020  than  to  rush  the  sea  wall  to  completion by  the
1990s.   This conclusion  is  reinforced when  the  added costs of a crash program
are considered.

Protection Strategies for Sullivans Island

     As a low-lying  barrier island,  Sullivans Island is  very vulnerable to a
rise in sea  level.   The medium and high rates  of sea level  rise  would  cause
most of  the island  to  be  lost by 2075,  assuming no protective measures  are
taken.    The  low scenario  would cause  substantial,  although  possibly  more
manageable,  land loss (Kana et al. 1984).

     This analysis  focuses on   two  major   planning  options  for  Sullivans
Island:  a beach stabilization program in the form of beach nourishment,  and a
prohibition  of future investment on the  island,  with the goal of returning the
island to its natural  (i.e., undeveloped) state.   Table  4 lists variations on
these protection options and their costs.

     Options  1   through  3  involve  beach  nourishment  programs,  starting  at
different times.   The costs of  the  beach nourishment options  were estimated
using the following  assumptions:4  the  length  of the beach  is approximately
7,600 m  (25,000  ft); the beach face  is  approximately 900 m  (3,000 ft)  wide;
the amount  of  sand  required to  stabilize  the beach increases  with sea  level
rise (i.e.,  a  30-cm  rise in sea level requires  that 30 cm of  sand be spread
across  the entire beach length [7,600  m]  and width [900 m]); 10 percent of the
placed  sand  is  lost  every  year  from  erosion and  must  be replaced;  the  unit
cost of sand  is  $13  per nH C$10 per yd^) for the  initial  application of sand
and $6.5  per nH  ($5 per yd^)  for  replacement sand  (the higher cost of  the
initial application  of  sand  includes  the  cost  of program  design and  the
identification of a  suitable offshore  source);  the backside  of the island is
approximately 7,600  m  (25,000  ft)  and  is  stabilized at  a cost of  $2,000/m
($6lO/ft), including operation and maintenance costs; the  shadow price (i.e.,
opportunity  cost) of the program funds  is  2.0  when evaluated  at a 3 percent
discount rate.   Because the amount of  sand  needed to stabilize the beach will
  Unit costs  are  derived  from  Sorensen,  Weisman,  and Lennon  (1984).   The
  estimate of  a 10  percent  loss of  sand  every year  is  based on  reports of
  previous beach nourishment projects and is  conservative  (i.e.,  probably low)
  for a beach facing open-ocean wave attack and possible hurricanes.


                                      66

-------
 vary  with the amount of  sea level rise, the  cost  of the program differs  for
 each  sea  level rise scenario.->

      Options  4 and  5  are  nonstructural alternatives.  Under these options   no
 investment  is permitted on the  island  following  1990 and 2020,  respectively.
 The  prohibition  of investments  includes  prohibiting not only new investment
 but  also  investments  to  upgrade  existing  properties  and  to  repair  storm
 damage.   The goal of  these  two options  is to  move  toward  an undeveloped
 island, possibly designating the area as a park.

      To  implement  either  Option  4  or  Option 5, the  city  would  have to  exert
 control over  the private properties on the island, either through zoning  or  by
 purchasing  the properties.   The property  is currently  valued at  over $65
 million.  The loss of the value of the use of the properties on  the island (by
 prohibiting  future  development)  is  incorporated  into the  estimated economic
 values."   The payment  of $65 million  by the government  to  current property
 owners would  be  a  transfer,  and consequently  does  not influence the estimate
 of net economic impacts.   Issues regarding  equity and the implementability  of
 the program are raised by the potential $65 million government payment.  These
 issues are not addressed here.

     An additional  option for  protecting the  island would be  to encircle  it
with a sea wall/levee system.  This option would protect the structures on the
 island, but unlike the  other options,  the recreational beaches would be lost.
Because the  beaches  are important  to  this  area,  we  did not  investigate this
option.

     To develop  a  strategy  for  preparing  for sea  level  rise  given current
uncertainties,  the  five  options  were  evaluated  for  each  sea  level  rise
scenario relative to doing nothing.  The  results  of this evaluation  are shown
in Table  5.   For  example,  the  estimates   for  Option  1  are interpreted  as
follows for the low scenario:

     •  Implementing the option  results in  an  increase  in economic  value  of
        $185 to $158 million.

     •  Implementing the program costs  $121  million.

     •  The net increased  economic value is  $185 - 121 =  $64 million  to $158 -
        121  = $37 million.
     In the  medium  and high  scenarios,  the sea  rises so  much by 2075  that
     nearly all  of  the island  would  have  to  be raised  in order to  prevent
     flooding.    Because  these  costs  of  raising  existing  structures  and
     regrading  the  island are not  included  in  the costs of Options  1  through
     3, the  cost of  these  options  in   the  medium  and high  scenarios  are
     probably underestimated.  The  addition  of  these  costs would reinforce the
     conclusions drawn  in  this analysis.

     In fact,  the  current  method  overestimates  the  losses caused  by  this
     strategy because  the  value of creating  a recreational  area,  such  as  a
     park  with  beaches,  is not estimated  separately.


                                      67

-------
                               Table 5.  Estimates of the  Economic Value  of the Development
                                         in  the Sullivans  Island Area for Five Protection Options
                                         (millions of 1980 dollars)3
00





1.






2.





3.





1.




5.





Protection Option
Np_ Action
-- Economic Valun

Beach Nourishment - 1990
— Increased Economic Value over
No Action
— Cost of Beach Nourishment Program
— Net Increased Economic Value
— Economic Value

Beach Nourishment - 2020
*
— Increased Economic Value over
No Action
-- Cost of Beach Nourishment Program
— Net Increased Economic Value
— Economic Value
Beach Nourishment - 2050
— Increased Economic Value over
No Action
— Cost of Beach Nourishment Program
— Net Increased Economic Value
— Economic Value
§. t pj>._l_n vest nw?I!.t_r_i9 9_Q
-- Increased Economic Value over
No Act ion
— Economic Va lue

Stop Investment - 2020
— Increased Economic Value over
No Action
-- Economic Value


Basel ine

153


131

71
60
213


81

11
10
193

38

26
12
165

-35

1 18


-18

135




81


185


61
118


130


16
130

52


2
86

31

1 15


31

115

Sea Leve
Low

- 115


- 158

121
- 37
- 152


- 101

8'l
- 20
- 135

- 38

50
- -12
- 103

1

- 1 16


9

- 121

Rise Scenario
Mod i urn

10 - 8/


165 - 123

178
-13 - -55
27 - 32


101 - 68

128
-27 - -60
13 - 27

12-8

78
-66 - -70
-26 - 17

72 - 25

1 12 - 112


52 - 21

92 - III
...

High

28 - 75


1 15 - 90

235
-120 - -115
-82 - -70


38 - 31

162
-121 - -131
-96 - -56


b/
NA



80 - 31

108 - 109


13 - 33

71 - 108

                   a/  All  estimates evaluated at  a  three percent real discount rate.

                   b/  Option 3 was not examined  for the high scenario because by 2050 the high scenario would  cause
                   sufficient damage and land loss so as to make beach stabilization infeasible.

-------
     •  The  total  economic value of this option  is  the economic value for No
        Action, plus the  incremental value  for the low scenario for Option 1,
        or:  $84 + 64 = $148 million to $115 + 37 = $152 million.

     The  results  for  the  other  sea  level  rise scenario/protection option
combinations are similarly interpreted.   Of note  is  that there are no direct
expenditures  for  implementing  Options 4  and  5,  and  that Option  3  is not
feasible for the high scenario.

     The  information  in  Table  5 provides   considerable   insight  into the
difficulty in  preparing  for sea level rise given  current uncertainties.   For
the baseline and low scenarios, Options 1 and  2  are  preferred.   If initiated
right away,  a beach nourishment program could  have an  incremental  value as
high as $60 million. In the low scenario,  the program can eliminate nearly all
the adverse  impacts of sea level rise.   Reducing investment (Options 4 and 5)
in  the  baseline  case  would  be  counterproductive,   producing  a  net  loss.
Although reducing investment in the low scenario may produce a gain over doing
nothing,  its  gain  is  not  as  large  as  the  potential  gain  from  beach
nourishment.    Thus, Options  4  and 5  are  inferior  for the baseline  and low
scenarios.

     The  opposite  is  true for the medium  and  high  scenarios.   For  these
scenarios, beach  nourishment  is so expensive  it makes  Options 1  through  3
uneconomical.  Options 4  and  5 are preferred  if the  sea  level  rises  at these
rates.

     If beach  nourishment  is  initiated,  and the  medium  or high  scenario is
found to be  true  in,  say,  2020, officials may  wish  to stop beach nourishment-
and reduce  future  investments  at  that  time.    However,  with  this  strategy,
funds would be spent unnecessarily  to  nourish  the  beach between now and 2020,
and investments made on the island  would subsequently be  lost.   There is also
the risk of not being able to stop the nourishment program once it has begun,
because   people's   expectations  will  have   been   established   regarding
protection.   Similarly,  if investment is  reduced  today,  and the  baseline or
low scenario is  true,  then officials  may  wish to initiate beach nourishment
in, say, 2020.   Again,  however, if the city has purchased  property,  and  park
development has  proceeded,  there may  be no  turning back.   Finally,  the  city
may elect to do nothing,  in the hope that  by  2020 sufficient information will
be available  to  make the correct  choice  at  that time..    Table  6  quantifies
these various strategic possibilities.

     Table 6  shows  the  returns  from  four strategies,  and  their  expected
values:

     *   Strategy  A:  Begin a beach nourishment  program.  This strategy is best
        when  the  future rate of sea level  rise  is expected to be low.

     •   Strategy  B:   Begin a disinvestment program.   This strategy  is  best
        when  the  future rate of sea level  rise  is expected to be high.

     *   Strategy  C:   Wait  until 2020  to  act.    This  strategy assumes  that  a
        correct decision cannot be made today.  Consequently, nothing  is done
        (in the way of a  coordinated  community response) until  2020,  when it
        is assumed  that  sufficient information  is available about  sea level


                                      69

-------
        rise to correctly  choose  between beach nourishment  (if the sea level
        rises by a small amount)  and  disinvestment (if the sea level rises by
        a large amount).

     •  Strategy D:    Act  correctly  today.   This  strategy is  not currently
        possible because it  requires knowing whether  the future  rate  of sea
        level  rise  will   be  below  the  low  scenario  or  above   the  medium
        scenario.

     The estimates of the economic value of each strategy under each sea level
rise scenario  are  drawn from Table  5.   The expected  value  is computed using
the following  subjective  weights  for  the scenarios:   baseline =  0.1;  low =
0.4; medium =  0.4;  and high = 0.1  (different weights  would produce different
expected values).    Based  on the expected values,  which  are driven  by  the
subjective weights, Strategy C  (Wait Until 2020) is preferred to Strategies A
and B.  Strategy B would maximize the  lowest  possible  return  (i.e., the worst
one would  do  with B  is $109 million),  and Strategy A  maximizes  the highest
return (i.e.,  the  best one would do with A is  $213  million).   For Strategy A
to  be  preferred  to  Strategy C  (using  the  expected  value  criterion),  the
baseline and low scenarios  must  be much more likely to  occur  than the medium
and high scenarios.  Similarly,  for Strategy B to be preferred, the medium and
high scenarios must be most likely.

         Table 6.   Estimates of the Value of Alternative Protection Strategies
                   for Sullivans  Island (millions of 1980 dollars)a
Protection Option Chosen Today
A. Beach Nourishment - 1990
B. Stop Investment - 1990
C. Wait until 2020 to Act
D. Able to Act Correctly Today
Beach Nourishment - 1990
Stop Investment - 1990
Sea Level Rise Scenario
Baseline
213
118
193
213
Low
150
115
130
150
Medium
30
112
-
112
High
-76
109
-
109
Expected Value
86.
113.
120.
137.
a All estimates evaluated at a 3 percent real discount rate.
     Strategy  D  in Table  6  is  not  feasible  because  there  is  currently
uncertainty about  the  future rate of sea level  rise.   However,  if  one were
sufficiently knowledgeable  to choose correctly  by  1990,  the  expected  value
would  increase  by  $17  million  over  Strategy  C  ($137  -  120  million).
Therefore,  although waiting  is  preferred  to  acting  today and  potentially
making a  mistake,  the  sooner  one can  act correctly,  the  better.   In  fact,
having better  information  today could  be  worth $17  million  for  Sullivans
Island.
                                      70

-------
THE NEED FOR REDUCING UNCERTAINTY

     These  findings  indicate that  in  the case of  Sullivans Island, there  is
considerable  value in  reducing  uncertainty about  future rates  of sea  level
rise.   Reliable,  narrow ranges of estimates of sea level  rise will enable
preferred protection options  to  be  unambiguously  identified for such areas  as
Sullivans  Island.   Although  the decision of whether to build a  sea wall  to
protect the  peninsula  is not sensitive  to  the  future rate of sea level  rise,
improved estimates may  be  required  to  establish design criteria and schedules
for projects  such as sea  walls.   Perhaps  most  important, improved estimates
may be a precondition for  initiating actions at the local level.  Individuals
and governments  may  not invest  the time and resources  necessary to plan for
sea level rise unless and until  the threats are clear and well known.

     A recent  book on  the  greenhouse  effect and sea level  rise contains the
following recommendations (Earth and Titus 1984):

     •  Federal  research on the  physical,  environmental, and economic impacts
        of sea level rise should be substantially expanded.

     •  Federal  support  for scientific research on the  rate  of future global
        warming and sea level rise should be greatly expanded.

     To make  progress,  the issue of sea level rise  must be elevated  to its
appropriate  level  of priority to  command attention  among decisionmakers and
leaders.     In  the  past,  natural  disasters  (hurricanes  and  tsunamis)  have
provided an  impetus  for inclusion  of  such issues on local  planning agendas.
Although disasters may  call attention  to  the need  to begin  planning  for sea
level rise,  I  hope that analyses such  as  this  one  may begin to  form a basis
for taking action before disasters occur.
REFERENCES

Earth, M.C.,  and J.G. Titus  (eds).   1984.
     rise:  A challenge for this generation.
Greenhouse effect  and sea level
New York: Van Mostrand Reinhold.
Gibbs, M.J.  1984.  Economic  analysis of sea level  rise:   Methods  and results.
     In Greenhouse effect and sea level rise,  eds.  M.C.  Earth and  J.G. Titus.

Hoffman, I.S.,  D.  Keyes, and J.G.  Titus.  1983.    Projecting  future  sea level
     rise:    Methodology, estimates to  the year  2100.  and research  needs.
     Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.

Kana, T.W., J. Michel, M.O.  Hayes, and J.R. Jensen. 1984.   The physical impact
     of  sea  level rise  in  the  area of Charleston,  South Carolina,    In
     Greenhouse effect and  sea  level rise, eds.  105-150,  M.C. Barth and J.G.
     Titus. New York:   Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Sorensen,  R.M.,  R.N.  Weisman,  and  G.P.  Lennon.   1984.   Control  of erosion,
     inundation,  and   salinity   intrusion   caused  by  sea  level  rise.    In
     Greenhouse effect  and  sea  level  rise, eds.  M.C.  Barth and J.G.  Titus.
     New York:  Van Nostrand Reinhold.
                                      71

-------
Titus, J.G.  1984.    Planning  for sea  level  rise  before  and after  a coastal
     disaster.  In Greenhouse  effect and sea  level rise,  M.C.  Barth and J.G.
     Titus, eds.   New York:  Van Nostrand Reinhold

Titus, J.G., and  M.C. Barth.  1984.  An overview of the cause and effects of sea
     level rise,  43-44.   In  Greenhouse effect and sea  level  rise.   New York:
     Van Nostrand Reinhold.
                                      72

-------
Impacts of Sea Level
Rise on the Coasts of South America

Stephen P. Leatherman
University of Maryland
College Park, Maryland USA
ABSTRACT

     South America  exhibits  a  wide  diversity of  coasts from  icy, deep fjords
along the  Chilean  Pacific  Coast  to  the muddy,  tropical  mangrove  coast of
Venezuela.    Fortunately,  this  continent  is  not  subject  to  hurricanes or
typhoons;  but winter coastal storms can be quite damaging,  especially along
the Atlantic  sandy shores and cliffs of  unconsolidated sediments.  Accelerated
sea level rise due  to  the greenhouse effect will increase  the rate of beach
erosion  and  cliff  retreat,  and  result in the  loss  of  significant coastal
Wetlands,  principally mangroves and  salt marshes.

     Popular  coastal resorts along sandy beaches in  South  America,  such as
Copacabana Beach, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; Punta del Este,  Uruguay; and Mar del
Plata,   Argentina,  are  already  adversely  affected  by  eroding  shorelines.
Copacabana Beach, perhaps the most famous beach  in the world,  was replenished
in  the   early  1970s  by  pumping  sand onshore  and  will   require  another
nourishment project within a  decade  if current trends continue.  The Argentine
government has  recognized the problem  of critically  narrow beaches at Mar del
Plata,  the nation's  chief coastal  resort, which  boasts the largest casino in
the world;  beach fill is to be  undertaken as soon as suitable  supplies of sand
can be located  on-  or offshore.   These  examples  illustrate the nature of the
problems along  sandy  coasts,  which are similar  in type and magnitude to those
experienced along the U.S. coastlines.

     Coastal  wetlands also  vary  geographically  in  type  and  extent.   Along
little-inhabited, muddy coasts of Guyana and Venezuela, accelerated sea level
fise may merely shift the coastal  flora inland.  Elsewhere, however, little
lowland  (coastal plain) exists behind  the coastal fringe  so that the wetlands
will be  squeezed  out with sea  level rise.   The  problem is particularly acute
in areas like Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro,  Brazil, where the large,  poor-
class people  are cutting down the mangrove forests for fuel.   At the same time
the Brazilian government seems  to  lack the environmental regulations and/or


                                    73

-------
enforcement  to  stop  the  onslaught  of  mangrove obliteration  by urbanization
(e.g.,  construction  of  factories   on  filled  wetlands  and  encroachment  of
squatters building shanty towns).

     Accelerated sea level rise  poses very  serious problems to a continent of
peoples  that are   struggling  to  even  maintain  their  present standard  of
living.  The  greenhouse-induced  coastal changes will  result in two radically
different  strategies:    the  popular   coastal   resorts  will   receive  prompt
attention  (e.g.,  sand  nourishment  as  required  to  maintain  recreational
beaches)  at  the   expense   of  other  critical   public   needs  through  the
reallocation of  scarce resources;  while coastal wetlands will receive benign
neglect for the most part since  governments at  all levels seem unable to cope
with the present, severe problems in urbanized areas.

INTRODUCTION

     South America is characterized by an extremely diverse coastline, ranging
from the hard-rock, steeped  cliffs  of Peru  and  Chile to the low, flat coastal
plain of  the  Amazon region.   To assess the impacts of accelerated sea level
rise on South America,  this  continent must  be  divided into regions that will
exhibit similar  responses.   This  partitioning  of  the coast  is based  on the
geologic framework  of  the continent and is  further  stratified by  considering
the  specific  landforms and  dominant processes  operative  within each coastal
zone.

     South America is almost a mirror image  of North America, with some quali-
fications (McGill  1958).  The  Pacific Coast along  Ecuador, Peru, and Chile is
dominated by  the Andes Mountains  with no  true coastal  plain.   Much  of the
coast  is  hard   (crystalline)  rock,  resulting  in  steep  cliffs  and  rocky
promontories.    Sandy  to  cobbly  beaches occur  as  scattered  pocket  beaches
interspersed along the cliffed coast.  The U.S.  Pacific Coast is quite similar
to its South American  counterpart as cliffs predominate;  small spits at river
mouths and  pocket  beaches  at shoreline  reentrants are  the only  low,  sandy
landforms along  the coastal margin.   Some  of  the  cliffs,  such as  those  in
Delmar  and  Malibu,  California,  are  composed  of  unconsolidated,  erodable
sediments,  and urbanization  of these areas   involves considerable risk  as the
sea  level  rises  and the  cliffs  retreat.    Similar  areas  are  found  along the
Pacific Coast of South America, but few  have population centers in  equivalent,
hazardous locations.

     In contrast to the technically active  coast of the Pacific, the Atlantic
Coast of the  Americas is largely  characterized  by a  low  coastal plain,  with
some exceptions.    Parts  of Mew  England,   particularly Maine, in  the  United
States have rocky  coasts  (nonerodable  crystalline granitic  rock),  which  form
steep vertical cliffs in some  areas.  The mirror image comparison  fits nicely
when one considers  that the  southern portion of  Argentina is also  a hard-rock
coast with similar characteristics.

     The Atlantic  Coast of  South America is generally low,  but the specific
landforms  are climatically  controlled.    The   northeast  Atlantic  Coast  of
Venezuela,   French   Guiana,  Surinam,  and the   Amazon   region  of  Brazil  are
dominated by  mangroves.   This low, muddy  coast is akin to  the Mississippi
River  delta  region  of the  U.S.  Gulf  Coast.    While Louisiana  is  already
experiencing major  problems  with shoreline  retreat and coastal  wetlands  loss


                                      74

-------
 with  relative  sea  level  rise,  equivalent changes in this South American region
 are   of   little  notice   or   importance  as   the  coastal  fringe   is  largely
 uninhabited.   The most  extensive beaches and  concentration of people extend
 from  Salvador, Brazil,  along the  Pio de Janeiro  coast, including  Punta  del
 Este, Uruguay, and terminate  south  of Mar del Plata,  Argentina.

      The  effects  of  accelerated sea  level  rise depend  upon  the  specific
 landform  type  that it  affects, which  is determined  by  the regional  geology  and
 dominant  processes.    The regional  geology  can be  explained by  continental
 drift (Inman and  Nordstrom  1971).   The Atlantic  Coast  is a "trailing  edge"
 coast and  hence  characterized  by wide coastal  plains and  extensive  sandy
 beaches and barrier  rslands.   Coastal  plains,  such  as  the pampas of Argentina,
 are of low  relief, gently slope,  and  are composed of unconsolidated (erodable)
 sediments.  By  contrast, the Pacific Coast is tectonically active  and subject
 to  both  volcanic  eruptions  and violent earthquakes  as have  been  recently
 recorded  in Colombia  and historically documented in  California   (e.g.,  1906
 disaster  in  San  Francisco).    This  "collision  coast"  in  plate  tectonic
 terminology  has  little  to   no   coastal plain;  instead,  the  coastal  range
 stretches along  the  U.S. Pacific Coast and  the corresponding Andes  Mountains
 in  the southern  hemisphere.    Cliffs  predominate, making the  coast  rather
 ragged in outline and  steep in relief.   Because  sea level rise effects will be
 very  localized and the South  American  Pacific  Coast  is not highly populated,
 the major concerns  are wetlands  loss  and  beach erosion  along  the  Atlantic
 shore.

 COASTAL WETLANDS

      The  Atlantic  Coast of  South America  has two distinct  types  of  coastal
 wetlands:  mangroves and salt marshes.   Mangroves are  the principal vegetation
 along the deltaic  coast  of the tropical northeast Atlantic.   While the Amazon
 River continues  to deliver  billions  of  tons  of fine  sediments  to the  coast
 yearly  (which  is  moved  In a  northwest  direction  along this coastal  compart-
 ment), evidence from field studies  and air photo analysis shows shore erosion
 (Wells  et al.  1980).    As  sea  level  rises,  the  entire coastal  zone  shifts
 landward up the gradual,  seaward-sloping coastal plain.  The mangroves  rooted
 in the  silty  substrate  along  the open ocean are  being eroded and undermined
 along the outer  edge,  which  indicates active shore  retreat.   Therefore,  the
 overall amount  of coastal wetlands has  probably  changed  little,  with  their
 spatial  distribution  changing  temporally.    Also, the  affected  areas have
 little population, and no major urbanized areas along the  coastal margin  are
 threatened by probable future sea level changes.

     This situation  changes  drastically  to  the  south,  particularly  in  the
 state of  Rio  de  Janeiro, Brazil.  Here the mountain  range  meets the coast at
 places,  creating the fascinating skyline of  bald mountain stacks (sugarloafs)
 rising out  of the  sea.   Wetlands,  particularly  mangroves in  this  tropical
 environment,  have  formed on  the  interface between land  and   sea  within
 protected  bays.     (The  wave  climate  is  too  high   and  the  sediment   too
 restrictive  to allow  mangrove  development  along  the  open   coast   in  this
 geomorphic province.)

     Mangroves  in  Guanabara   Bay,  which  separates  the cities  of   Rio  and
Niteroi,   are  already  rapidly declining  in  areal  extent  due to  population
pressures.  The  large  poor  class uses  the mangrove trees as  fuel, and resi-


                                      75

-------
dents  of  shanty   towns  have  clear-cut  the forest  in  adjacent  Bay  areas.
Furthermore, industrial expansion has  resulted  in  the loss of wetlands as the
upper margins of Guanabara Bay  are  filled to provide inexpensive construction
sites on  the new  land.   Brazilian federal  and Rio state  regulations  to the
contrary, the onslaught continues largely unabated to the point that thousands
of square kilometers of mangroves have been reduced to a fraction of the total
(estimated at less than 100 knr by some Brazilian coastal ecologists; Vallejo,
personal communication 1985).  Accelerated sea level rise will exacerbate this
serious problem,  because  the mangroves  on  the tidal flats are  backed  by the
cliffs of the coastal mountain  range.   Therefore,  these wetlands cannot shift
landward (migrate upslope as  in  the  case of deltaic and chenier plains of the
northeast coast).   Instead,   the mangroves  will be gradually  squeezed  out of
existence in this  region due  to  natural conditions and artificial constraints
(human development in the coastal fringe).

BEACH AND CLIFF EROSION

     South Americans  are  fortunate that  no  hurricanes have been  reported in
this hemisphere.   However,  the  Atlantic Coast from Salvador,  Brazil,  to Mar
del Plata  (the  heavily  populated coastal area  with  sandy  beaches)  is subject
to winter  storms.   This moderate  to  high wave climate  in  a  microtidal (less
than 2 m tidal range) setting (Davies  1973) indicates the potential for storm-
induced damage and the long-term problems of sea level rise.

     The Argentine coast from south of Mar  del  Plata along the Atlantic Coast
up to the Rio de  La  Plata estuary  is  presently eroding.  Cliff erosion of the
unconsolidated  to  loosely  compacted sediments  is  a major  concern  in  the Mar
del Plata  region  (Figure  1).   The pocket and mainland  beaches in this region
are eroding at variable rates, approaching 2-4 m per year in the most severely
affected areas  (Schnack 1985).   In fact,  the beaches  of Mar del  Plata are
already  critically narrow,  and  a groin field (of  little utility) has  been
installed.  The federal government has recognized  the  problem and is planning
a major  beach nourishment project  as soon  as  suitable fill  material  can be
located.  This coastal resort, which is Argentina's most popular and hosts the
largest single  casino  in  the world,  will require  continued beach restoration
with ever-increasing amounts  of fill as sea level rise accelerates.

     Just to the north of Mar del Plata, the cliffs subside to meet the gently
sloping  pampas  of northern  Argentina.   These broad,  flat features are  the
Argentine  equivalents  of  the  U.S.   Atlantic coastal  plain  (Figure  2).
Therefore, estimates  of  shore retreat  with  sea level  rise  should  correspond
closely with their North American counterparts and  depend upon such factors as
slope, 3-D geomorphology,  and wave climate (Leatherman 1983, 1984).   Holocene-
age (5,000-year-old) beach ridges can  be found  several  meters  above sea level
in the Mar  Chiquita  area.   If this area has  been  geologically stable,  as now
believed (Schnack, Fasano, and  Isla  1982),  then these  inland  beach ridges on
the  pampas  record a  previous  sea  level  high stand  during the  Holocene.
Similar  age-dated and  stratigraphically equivalent  beach  ridges  have  been
described in Brazil  (Suguio  and Ostrom  1982; Suguio and Martin  1976),  but no
such features have  ever  been documented along  the  U.S.  East  and  Gulf coastal
plains.   While  this  occurrence  provides ample  food  for  thought for  coastal
geologists  and  neotectonists,   the  present  and  future  evolution of  these
coastal  plains   in  both  hemispheres   should   follow  similar  pathways  with
accelerated sea level rise.


                                      76

-------

     Figure  1.   Near Mar  del  Plata,  the Argentine coast  is  characterized by
low bluffs  (5-10 m high), which  are  generally comprised  of  highly erodable,
unconsolidated materials.   The  coastal  highway  (main  thruway) from  Mar del
Plata to Mar Chiquita is  threatened by  cliff recession,  indicating an already
severe beach erosion  problem  which will only be  exacerbated  with accelerated
sea level rise.
     Figure  2.     At  Mar  Chiquita,  salt  marsh  and  lagoonal  deposits  are
Presently being eroded on  the  active beach face.   This  situation  indicates a
long-term and continuing trend of barrier  recession, which  is similar to that
found on U.S. East and Gulf Coast barrier islands.
                                      77

-------
     The state  of Rio  de  Janeiro, as  already mentioned,  is  largely charac-
terized by the coastal  mountain  range  intersecting the coast.   However, small
coastal barriers  to  either side of  Rio proper will be  greatly  influenced by
sea  level  rise  (Muehe  1979;  Figure  3).    As  these  burgeoning  coastal
communities derive their potable water from the groundwater  table at shallow
depths, sea level rise  will diminish  the  size  of this  freshwater lens through
time.    (Even  without  such  a  rise,  it  seems  likely  that  the  ensuing
overpopulation of these fragile coastal environments  will  virtually ruin the
potable water supply by waste discharge directly into barrier substrate.)

     The sandy beaches  of Rio  and  Niteroi  along Guanabara Bay are all artifi-
cial, having been created by beach fill (Figure 4).  Although the wave climate
of this sheltered embayment is low, sea level rise will cause shore erosion as
has  been  documented  in  similar  environmental  settings  along the  U.S.  coast
(e.g., Calveston Bay, Texas; Leatherman 1984).

     The outer,  open ocean beaches of  Copacabana and Ipanema are more subject
to  rapid  retreat.   The world  famous  Copacabana  Beach  was nourished  in the
early  1970s  by  Dutch  engineers who  pumped offshore  sand onto  the beaches.
Unfortunately, the grain size  of the introduced material  was  slightly larger
than the native  sand so that  the beaches  have  become noticeably steeper since
nourishment (Julio Gongalez, personal communication 1985).  This beach profile
alteration actually  reduced the  usable  intertidal  foreshore beach (apart from
the  widening  of  the dry backshore  beach  region).    In addition,  larger waves
now  break directly on  the beach  face,  which makes  even the shallow water zone
dangerous for small  children.    Copacabana  Beach  is already  quite narrow and
heavily  utilized  (Figure  5)  so  that another beach  fill  project will  be
required soon.   Beaches are clearly a  national priority  in Brazil so that as
sea  level  rises  and the beaches recede,  money will be  allocated to maintain
this  international tourist  area  if necessary,   at  the  expense  of other public
needs.

     New high-rise residential developments  are in the suburbs to the west of
Rio  along  the   Atlantic  Ocean  barriers.   Here   high-rise  construction  of
condominiums  is  proceeding at  a rapid pace (Figure 6)  despite  the apparent
shore retreat.   This type of  building  along an already eroding,  low shoreline
is reminiscent of the  Miami Beach, Florida,  development  in the 1950s and more
recently  the  high-rise  construction  at Ocean City,  Maryland,  in  the  1970s
(Figure 7;  Leatherman   1981, 1986).   Parallels can easily  be  drawn among the
construction  practices, lack  of governmental  control and  planning,  present
hazardous  situation  for  the  development,   and the  impending problems  with
accelerated sea  level  rise.   At  Miami  Beach and Ocean  City, large-scale beach
nourishment projects costing  $65 million and  $30  million,  respectively,  have
already been conducted or will be shortly undertaken.  The high-rise buildings
along  the  barrier shorelines  of the  swanky Rio suburbs will  also soon  be in
the  same predicament,  and one  can  assume  that  political  muscle and power will
be applied so that public funds are used to protect private investment.

CONCLUSIONS

     South  America  has a  diverse   coastline, but  similar  conditions  and
problems  exist   in  both American  hemispheres  especially  along  the Atlantic
Coast.   While  large portions  of  the  coastal zone have  not been  mapped in
detail  and frequently  only general descriptions  exist,  the present erosional


                                      78

-------
     Figure  3.   Rapid  urbanization  is occurring  along  this coastal  barrier,
just to the east of Rio.  The populace draws  their water  from  the  near-surface
(unconfined) ground water table.  As sea level  rises,  this  low  barrier will  be
subject  to increased  flooding  and reduced  supplies of  potable  water due  to
contraction of the fresh water lens.
     Figure  4.    The  Rio  de  Janeiro  area lacks  any  true  coastal  plain.
Historical erosion and  cliff  instability are evident  across  Guanabara Bay in
Niteroi.   The  beaches  in this  area  are all artificial  in  that sand has been
Manually  emplaced from  dredging  operations  offshore.    Although  the  wave
climate is low in the sheltered bay,  increased sea level rise will cause beach
erosion  and  eventually   reactivate   cliff  retreat   in  the  absence  of
litigating measures.
                                      79
any

-------
      Figure 5.   Copacabana Beach in Rio  is  perhaps  the most famous beach in
the world.   This  beach was nourished  in  the  early 1970s with offshore sands.
The beaches are already overcrowded  by  U.S.  standards,  and another beach fill
project will be necessary in the near future.
     Figure 6.  To the west of Rio is a major suburban development occupied by
the  relatively  wealthly Brazilians.    Unfortunately,  there  is  little  to • no
planning, and  high-rise condominiums  are  being constructed  along  the waters
edge.  Shore recession rates are not available, but the presence of a wave-cut
scarp along a high energy coast indicates ongoing beach erosion and the poten-
tial for major problems in the future for this urbanizing coastal barrier.
                                      80

-------
     Figure 7.  Ocean City, Maryland, is overbuilt with high-rise condominiums
located along the eroding beach strand.
;-rend along  populated,  sandy coastal  areas  is  obvious,  and  we  can expect
increasing,  critical  problems with accelerated sea  level rise.   In  summary,
the major problems  will be experienced  at the coastal  resort  and population
°enters  (e.g.,  Rio  de Janeiro,  Brazil,  and Mar del  Plata,  Argentina) due to
beach erosion  and  cliff retreat.   Coastal wetlands,  particularly mangroves,
**ill be  virtually eliminated  in  these  coastal  areas  due to overpopulation and
Orowding as well  as to  loss  of  suitable  intertidal  areas  with continued sea
ievel rise.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

     This   paper  was   made  possible   by   the  Partners  of  America   program,
^shington,  D.C., in  that  Dr. Leatherman was  able to exchange  ideas with the
^esident South American coastal scientists and travel along a large portion of
the Brazilian  and  Argentine coasts.    This exchange of  ideas  and papers has
Resulted  in  closer  international  relationships  and helped  to  provide  the
Scientific framework   for  future  studies  along  the  sandy  beaches  in  both
        hemispheres.

-------
REFERENCES

Davies, J.L.  1973.  Geographical  variation  in coastal development.  New York:
     Hatner Publishing Co.

Inman,  D.L.,  and  C.E.  Nordstrom.  1971. On  the  tectonic and  morphological
     classification of coasts. Journal of Geology. 79:1-21.

Leatherman,  S.P.  1981.  Barrier  beach  development:    A  perspective  on  the
     problem. Shore and Beach. 49:2-9.

Leatherman, S.P.  1983.  Coastal hazards  mapping  on barrier islands.  Proc.  of
     National Symposium on Preventing Coastal Flood Piasters,  Natural Hazards.
     Res.  & Appl.  Spec.  Publ. #1,  Boulder, Colorado, p. 165-75.

Leatherman, S.P.  1984,  Geomorphic response of coastal landforms  to projected
     sea level  rise.  In Greenhouse effect  and  sea level  rise, eds.  M. Earth
     and J. Titus, 151-178. New York:  Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Leatherman,  S.P.  1986.  Shoreline response to  sea-level  rise:   Ocean City,
     Maryland. Proc. of Icelandic Conference  on  Coasts and Rivers,  Reykjavik^.
     Iceland, in press.

McGill, J.T. 1958. Map of coastal  landforms of the world. Geographical Review.
     48:402-5.

Muehe,  D.   1979.  Sedimentology  and   topography   of  a  high  energy  coastal
     environment  between  Rio  de  Janeiro  and Cabo Frio,  Brazil.  An.  Acad...
     Brazil. Ciena.  51:473-81.

Schnack, E.J. 1985.  Argentina. In  The world coastline,  eds. E.G.  Bird and M.L.
     Schwartz, 69-76.  New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.

Schnack, E.J., J.L.  Fasano, and F.I. Isla. 1982.  The evolution of Mar Chiquita
     lagoon  coast,  Buenos Aires  province,  Argentina.  In Holocene sea level
     fluctuations, magnitude and causes. 143-55.  IGCP #61 Project, INQUA.

Suguio, K.,  and L.  Martin.  1976.  Brazilian coastline  quaternary  formations—
     the states of Sao Paulo and  Bahia littoral  zone evolution schemes. Proc.
     of Intern. Symp. Continental Margin of Atlantic Type. Acad.  Bras. Cien.
     48:325-34.

Suguio, K.,  and  L.M.  Ostrom.  1982.  Progress in  research on quaternary  sea
     level  changes  and coastal  evolution  in  Brazil.  In  Holocene sea level
     fluctuations, ed. D.J. Colquhaun, p. 166-81. IGCP #61 Program.

Wells,  J.,  D.  Prior,  and  J.  Coleman.  1980. Flowslides  in  muds and extremely
     low angle tidal flats, northeastern South America. Geology 8:272-75.
                                      82

-------
 Potential Effects of Sea Level  Rise
 on the Coasts of Australia, Africa, and Asia

 Eric C. F. Bird
 University of Melbourne
 Melbourne, Australia
INTRODUCTION

     Recent  studies (e.g.,  Barth and  Titus  1984)  have  indicated  the  possi-
bility that human -induced global climatic  changes will result in a rise of sea
•Level:  it is  thought  that  atmospheric  warming  will lead to a  reduction  in
glaciers  and  ice  sheets  and a  consequent  addition of  water  volume to  the
°ceans, as well  as to  thermal expansion of ocean water.  Hoffman (1984)  esti-
toated a rise of 0.24-1.17 m (0.78-3.8 3  ft) by  2050,  and  0.56-3.45  m (1.83-
3-83 ft)  by 2100.   According to  these predictions,  sea  level will stand  1  m
[3-3  ft)  higher  than  it  is  now  between  2045  (high scenario)  and  2140
(conservative scenario).

     Factors  that  complicate  the prediction of actual  changes  on  particular
Actors of the world's  coastline  include  tectonic uplift or subsidence of the
land  margin,   the  effects of  the  additional  water load,  which may  hydro-
isostatically depress the submerged  land,  and the spatial variability  of ocean
surface  levels,  which make it  unlikely  that the  rise  of  sea level will  be
equivalent  around  the  world's  coastlines,  even  on sectors  where the  land
      remains stable.
     This  paper  is  concerned with the potential geomorphological,  ecological,
    socio-economic  consequences of a  rise  of mean  sea level,  relative  to  the
°°astal  land  margin,  of the order of one  meter within  the next century,  and
Defers particularly to the coastlines  of  Australia, Africa, and Asia (Bird  and
Schwartz 1985).

     A mean sea  level  rise of 1  m (3.3 ft) implies that the  mean  high  spring
     limit will  rise a similar amount,  subject to any  modification of tidal
     tude  due to  the  deepening  of nearshore  waters  in relation   to coastal
configuration.    As a  first  approximation,   the  forecast coastline may  be
 etermined by surveying  a contour 1  m (3.3  ft) above high spring  tide  line,
    allowance must  then be made for  the effects of erosion  or deposition as


                                     83

-------
submergence proceeds.  Submergence  will  result in coastline recession, except
where the coast consists of  a  vertical cliff,  or where deposition of sediment
continues  at   a   sufficient  rate   to   maintain  or   prograde   the  coast.
Progradation may  continue  in  the vicinity of the mouths  of  major sediment-
yielding  rivers  which have built  large  deltas,  such  as  the  Ganges,  the
Irrawaddy, and  the Mekong  in  Asia,  but erosion  is already prevalent on some
deltas,  notably the Nile and Volta deltas in Africa.

EFFECTS OF SUBMERGENCE

     The general effects of coastal submergence may be listed as follows:

     •  On  cliffed  coasts  submergence   is likely   to  accelerate  coastline
        recession, except on outcrops  of  hard  rock formations,  where the high
        and low tide lines  will simply move up the cliff face.   Existing shore
        platforms and abrasion ramps will disappear beneath the sea.

     •  The shores of deltas  and coastal  plains will retreat,  except where
        they are maintained by coastal sedimentation.

     •  Beaches will  be narrowed,  and beach  erosion will become  much  more
        extensive and severe than it is now.

     •  Inlets, embayments,  and  estuaries will be enlarged and  deepened,  and
        increasing  salinity  penetration  will  cause  a  regression  of coastal
        ecosystems:  where possible, mangrove  and salt marsh communities will
        move back  into terrain presently occupied by freshwater vegetation.

     •  Coastal lagoons will also become  larger  and deeper, but the enclosing
        barriers  may  transgress  landward on  to  them.   If the  barriers  are
        submerged,  or  destroyed  by erosion,  the lagoons will  become coastal
        inlets or embayments.

     •  Low-lying areas on  coastal plains, such as sebkhas  (saline depressions
        now subject  to occasional  marine flooding)  on  arid coasts,  will  be
        flooded to form permanent lagoons.

     •  Upward growth of coral and  associated  organisms  will be stimulated on
        fringing biogenic reefs,  keeping pace with the marine transgression or
        lagging somewhat behind it (Neumann and Macintyre 1985).

     •  Erosion, structural damage,  and marine flooding caused by storm surges
        or tsunamis  will  intensify because of the greater heights  of waves
        arriving through deepening coastal waters.

     •  Water tables will rise in coastal regions, and soil and water salinity
        will be augmented.

     If the sea level  rise continues,  the sea  will eventuallyreoccupy levels
it held  in  the Late Pleistocene  (e.g., the 3-m  and 7-m  emerged coastlines in
southeastern Australia), reviving raised  beaches and  rejuvenating Pleistocene
bluffs as active cliffs.

-------
     It should  be  noted  that  many existing  coastal features  have developed
during a period of  relatively stable sea level.  Over the past 6000 years, the
sea has remained at  or  close to its present  level  on much of the Australian,
African, and Asian coastline,  in  contrast with the  slow marine transgression
recorded on  parts  of the Atlantic coast  of  North  America,  and  the  secular
emergence resulting  from  postglacial  isostatic  rebound  in  Scandinavia  and
northern Canada  (Bloom  1977).   The Holocene sea level  "stillstand"  has been
"larked by the development of broad shore  platforms  on many cliffed coasts, of
beach-ridge   plains,  prograded  barriers,  deltas,   and   depositional  terraces
formed under mangroves and  salt marshes.   Such features will not immediately
redevelop at higher levels as the sea  rises:   they will  evolve only gradually,
after a new  sea level stillstand  has  become established.  Such  a stillstand
requires the attainment of  a new balance between global atmospheric  tempera-
tures  and  ice  volumes,   which  could  occur  at  any  level up  to  60 m,  the
estimated height of the  ocean  surface  if  all the  world's glaciers  and. ice
sheets were  to  melt (Donn, Farrand, and Ewing 1962).

     On the  coasts  of Australia, Africa, and  Asia the most dramatic changes in
a century of rising sea  level  are likely  to be  on beaches,  around  coastal
lagoons, and in mangrove  ecosystems.   These will  now be  considered further.

SEA LEVEL RISE  AND  BEACH EROSION

     Studies by the  International  Geographical  Union's  Commission  on  the
Coastal Environment have  demonstrated  that  there  is already a  prevalence of
erosion on sandy beaches:  more than  70% of the world's  sandy coastline has
shown net erosion  over the  past few decades,  and less  than 10$ net prograda-
fcion;  the  remaining  20% -30% have  remained   stable,  or  shown no  measurable
change within this period (Bird 1985).  Beach erosion  is  partly  due  to a sea
level rise of the order of  1.2  mm/yr  (0.05  in/yr)  (i.e., about one-eighth the
rate of sea level rise forecast for the next century)  recorded on tide gauges
at>ound  the  world's  coastline  since   the  beginning  of  the  present  century
(Gornitz et  al. 1982; Pirazzoli 1984).   However,  this  is only one of fourteen
^actors  identified by  the  Commission as  initiating  or  accelerating  beach
eposion (Table  1).    A  sea level rise  of  1  m  (3.3  ft)  during the forthcoming
century will  certainly  become  the major  factor causing  recession of  sandy
beaches, but most of the other factors will continue to  operate.  An exception
"fcy be  found locally  where  beaches that were  nourished with  sediment derived
y^om nearby cliffs actually  receive  an increased sediment supply because sea
level  rise has  accelerated cliff  erosion.   On the  other hand the supply of
"luvial sediment to beaches will diminish, as greater proportions are retained
       submerging river  mouth areas.
     Because there  are so  many variables,  it  is  difficult to  forecast the
e*tent of erosion  or deposition that  will accompany  submergence  by a rising
f|ea (Leatherman 1984).  Bruun  (1962) devised  the rule that beaches in equili-
b^iuni with the processes  at work on them will  respond to  a sea level rise by
°elng cut back and lowered until a new equilibrium profile is established.  It
 3 possible to estimate  the extent of recession necessary -to accomplish this
Under the conditions specified by Bruun (Figure  1), but in practice many beach
^sterns are complicated by  gains and losses of sediment from offshore, along-
shore and hinterland sources (Figure 2),  and prediction of the response to sea
level  rise  then becomes  much more difficult.    A  beach  could  be maintained
          period  of  sea  level  rise if  it  were supplied  with  sufficient


                                      85

-------
Table 1.   Factors That Favor Initiation or  Acceleration  of Beach Erosion
  1.   Diminution of  fluvial  sand supply to  the coast,  as a result  of  reduced
       runoff  and sediment  yield  from a  river  catchment   (e.g.,  because  of
       reduced  rainfall,  or  dam  construction   leading  to sand  entrapment  in
       reservoirs, or successful soil conservation works).

  2.   Reduction  in  sand  supply from eroding cliffs  and shore outcrops  (e.g.,
       because of diminished runoff, a decline  in  the  strength  and  frequency of
       wave attack,  or the building of sea  walls to halt  cliff recession).

  3.   Reduction  of  sand  supply to  the  shore where dunes that had been moving
       from inland are stabilized, either by natural vegetation colonization or
       by conservation works, or where the sand  supply from this  source  has run
       out.

  U.   Diminution of sand supply washed  in by waves and  currents  from the  adja-
       cent sea  floor,  either because the sand  supply has run out,  or  because
       the transverse  profile  has attained a form that  no longer  permits  such
       shoreward drifting.

  5.   Reduction  in sand supply from alongshore  sources as the  result of inter-
       ception (e.g., by a constructed breakwater).

  6.   Increased  losses of sand  from the beach   to the backshore  and  hinterland
       areas by  landward  drifting  of dunes,  notably where backshore  dunes  have
       lost their retaining  vegetation  cover and  drifted inland,  lowering  the
       terrain immediately behind the beach and  thus reducing  the  volume  of sand
       to be removed to achieve coastline recession.

  7.   Removal of sand from  the  beach  by quarrying,  and losses  of sand  from
       intensively used recreational beaches.

  8.   Increased  wave  attack resulting  from  the  deepening of nearshore  water
       (e.g.,   where  a shoal  has  drifted  away,  where seagrass vegetation  has
       disappeared,  or where dredging has taken  place).

  9.   Submergence and  increased  wave  attack  as  the  result  of  a  rise  of  sea
       level relative to the land.

  10.  Increased  wave  attack  due  to   a  climatic  change yielding  a  higher
       frequency, duration,  or severity of  storms in coastal waters,

  11.  Diminution in the  volume  of beach material as the  result  of weathering,
       solution, or attrition of beach sand grains leading to a. lowering of the
       beach face and a consequent increase of wave attack on  the  backshore.

  12.  Increased beach erosion resulting from a  rise in  the water  table, due to
       increased  rainfall or local  drainage  modification,  rendering the  beach
       sand wet and more readily eroded.

  13.  Increased  losses of sand alongshore as a  result of  a change  in the  angle
       of incidence of waves (e.g., as the  result of shoal or  reef growth,  or of
       breakwater construction).

  14.  Intensification of wave attack as  the result  of  lowering of the  beach
       face on  an  adjacent  sector  (e.g.,  as  the result of reflection  scour
       induced by sea wall construction).
  SOURCE:  Bird (1985)


                                        86

-------
     Figure   1.    The   Bruun  Rule  states  that  a  beach  that  has  attained
     ibrium  with coastal  processes  (Profile  1)  will  respond to a rise  in sea
level by  losing sand from the  upper part  of  the profile and gaining it  in the
nearshore  area  until  a  new  equilibrium  (Profile  2)  is  established.    The
c°astline will  thus retreat  from A to B as  the  direct result of  the sea level
rise, and from B to C as  a result of  the  transference of sand  seaward.   It is
Possible  to  predict  the  extent of  coastline recession where  the  conditions
Proposed by  Bruun apply,  but it should be noted that other factors  (see Table
1) also influence the changes  that will occur on a beach as a  result of a sea
level rise.
                                SUPPLY OF SAND TO A BEACH
                                                    |beacn quarrying!
                                               sand volume reduced by
                                                  weathering and
                                                   attrition
                               LOSSES OF SAND FROM A BEACH
     Figure  2.
rr>om a beach.
The various ways  in which  sand is  supplied to,  and removed
                                       87

-------
quantities  of  sediment  from  nearby  rivers,  melting  glaciers  or  spilling
dunes.  Erosion of a beach undergoing marine submergence would also be reduced
if at  the same time  the coastal environment  became  calmer and  drier,  or  if
swash-dominant  wave  regimes replaced  drift-dominant  wave  regimes  (i.e.,   if
losses by  longshore  drifting are  reduced)  as a result  of  changes in coastal
configuration that accompany a sea level rise.

     A great deal of additional  site-specific  research is therefore needed  to
determine the extent  of beach  erosion that  will  result  from a sea level rise
of the order of 1  m (3-3 ft) over the next century.

EFFECTS OF SEA LEVEL RISE ON COASTAL LAGOONS

     Coastal lagoons, formed where  inlets,  estuaries,  or embayments have been
partly or  wholly sealed off from  the sea  by the formation  of depositional
spits, barrier islands,  and barriers, are numerous on the coasts of Australia,
Africa, and parts of Asia.   Typically  they show salinity gradients from fresh
river  inflow  through  brackish  to  sea water, and are  important  to coastal
fisheries, especially as breeding  and feeding areas.   In Asia,  especially  in
India and Sri Lanka, some  have  been extensively converted into brackish-water
fish ponds  (e.g.,  the  lagoons  south of Madras),  while others have been modi-
fied by  increased freshwater outflow  resulting from  development of irrigated
rice fields in their immediate hinterlands, e.g.,  Kalametiya Lagoon, Sri Lanka
(see Mahinda Silva 1986).

     A sea  level  rise  of  1 m  (3-3 ft)  over  the next  century  is  likely  to
increase  marine  influences  in  such lagoons by  deepening and  widening  their
tidal  inlets.   At  the  same time  the depositional  spits  and  barriers  that
enclose  them will   be   trimmed  back  on  their  seaward  shores   and  possibly
breached locally:  as  sand is washed  and  blown across them,  they will trans-
gress  landward  (Bird  1983).    In  turn,  the  lagoons  will  -become  deeper  and
(unless  deposition  offsets  this)  larger  in area,  inundating  marginal lands,
and  initiating  or  intensifying erosion  on  their shores.    Where enclosing
barriers are submerged  or  removed  by erosion,  lagoons will open out as marine
inlets or embayments.

     Some of  the  likely  consequences  of sea  level  rise can  be deduced  from
studies of changes in coastal  lagoons  where sea water inflow has increased  as
the  result  of  the  opening or  enlargement of a  tidal  entrance,  as  in  the
Gippsland Lakes in southeastern  Australia,  where  the  cutting of an artificial
entrance  in  1889  resulted  in  previously  freshwater  lakes  becoming brackish
estuarine  lagoons,  with die-back  of freshwater vegetation  fringes and their
replacement by  salt  marsh, the displacement of freshwater  biota by estuarine
and  marine  species,  and   the  onset  of  extensive  shoreline  erosion  (Bird
1978).    Similar   changes   have  followed  the  opening  or  widening  of  tidal
entrances  to  other  coastal lagoons,  notably  the  Ebrie Lagoon  on  the  Ivory
Coast and Lake St. Lucia in South Africa.  A sea level rise would have similar
effects, and would accentuate changes  in already-estuarine lagoons such as the
Gippsland  Lakes.   By  contrast,  the Murray-mouth1 lagoons  in  South Australia
were  brackish  until  19^0,  when natural  tidal entrances were sealed by  bar-
rages, and  they have since developed  into  freshwater  lakes,  with associated
ecological  changes  that  are  the  reverse  of those  seen  in  the  Gippsland
Lakes.   Where  coastal lagoons have  thus  been  artificially separated from the
marine environment, they will only be maintained in their present condition  by
raising  the enclosed barrages to prevent the rising sea  from reinvading.

-------
SEA LEVEL RISE AND MANGROVE ECOSYSTEMS

     Mangrove-fringed coastlines have become much less extensive in Australia,
Africa,  and Asia in recent decades because of the impacts of land reclamation,
fishpond construction,  mining, and waste disposal, but where they persist they
typically stand  in  front  of zones  of salt  marsh and  freshwater  vegetation
(fen, scrub,  or swamp forest).  In many cases there has been coastal prograda-
tion accompanied  by  the advance of  the mangroves (often  arranged  in species
zones),  with salt marsh and freshwater  communities following  in succession as
sedimentation builds  up the substrate to appropriate  levels, forming an inter-
tidal depositional terrace.

     A sea level  rise  will reverse this, unless  sedimentation  continues at a
Efficient rate to maintain or prograde  the  coastline.   Submergence will kill
th®  seaward   mangroves and   initiate  erosion  of  the  previously  prograded
terrace.  As  the coastline retreats the mangrove zone will migrate landward to
d*splace the  salt marsh,  which in  turn will  invade the  freshwater  hinter-
land.   Mangroves  regenerate  quickly  in areas  that have  been cleared  then
 bandoned,  and it is  likely that they will spread back on the  suitable hinter-
     habitats as  the sea  rises, but where  the hinterland  is steep  or rugged
    mangrove  zone may be extinguished by submergence.

     On  the Asian coast the land immediately  behind  the  mangroves  is commonly
     intensively for  fish ponds or rice fields,  and  it  is these that would be
G°lonized by  the  regressing  mangroves,  if  local people  permit.   In  drier
a^as,  as  in  northern  Australia,  mangroves are  backed  by bare,  hypersaline
Plains,  and in these  areas a sea level  rise  will result  in the colonization of
Presently unvegetated tracts by  mangroves as the coastline retreats.

      RESPONSES TO COASTAL SUBMERGENCE  AND EROSION

     Secular  coastal  submergence rates of as  much as  a meter  per century have
j     been  documented  in historical  times.    Goudie   (1977) quoted  Vasilev's
\1969)  report of  submergence  of  parts  of the Black Sea  coast at rates of 30-
?2-5 cm  (11.8-20.5 in) per century; Tjia (1970) recorded  up  to 30 cm  (11.8
Tn)/century from  parts  of  Indonesia,  and  Veenstra  (1970),   10-20  cm  (4-8
ln)/century from the  southern  shores  of the  North Sea. Sudden  submergence has
Recurred locally as the result of earthquakes, as on  Homer Spit, Alaska,  parts
 f which  sank nearly  2 m  (6.6  ft)  in  the  1964  earthquake,   around  Tumaco,
Colombia,  which subsided up to  1.6 m (5.2 ft) in the 1979  earthquake,  and  in
 he Rann  of  Kutch,  Pakistan,  which has  been  subject  to  recurrent  tectonic
subsidence  (Bird 1985), but such events have  been highly localized,  and their
 ffects  are not necessarily indicative  of the changes that would accompany a
     gradual  but sustained global  sea level  rise.

     A more rapid rise  occurred  in  prehistoric times.  About 18,000  years ago,
   the end of  the Last Glacial  cold  period, sea level stood about  140 m (460
    lower than  it does now.   Global warming  then produced a rapid sea  level
 isei  the  Flandrian  Transgression,  which  brought  the  sea up  close  to  its
Resent  level  about   6000 years  ago,   at  an average  rate of 1.16  m  (3.8
 ^/century.    It  was   probably  an  oscillatory rise,  phases   of  more  rapid
 ^mergence alternating  with phases of  slower  submergence  or episodes  of
          (Fairbridge  1961;  Bloom 1977).   Primitive societies  that  occupied
        shelf areas  were  forced to  retreat  as this   transgression  proceeded.


                                     89

-------
Thus,  the   Australian   Aborigines  became  separated  from  their  Tasmanian
counterparts with  the submergence  of Bass  Strait between  13,500  and  12,000
years ago and were  cut off from Papua Mew Guinea by the submergence of  Torres
Strait 8,000 to 6,500 years ago (Bird 1986).  Unfortunately, we have no  record
of their  perceptions and  reactions  to  a sea level rise proceeding at a rate
similar to that expected over the coming century.

     The ways in which  modern coastal societies  will  respond to a relatively
rapid rise  in  sea  level will  vary  considerably with  political  and economic
factors.   Within  the  regions here considered,  the  response  in developed
countries such  as  Australia, South  Africa,  Japan, and Singapore will  differ
from that of less developed countries in tropical Africa and Asia.  The  former
will have the organization,  technology,  and resources  to  counter the effects
of a sea level  rise, whereas the latter will in general have to choose between
evacuation and  adaptation to their changing coastal environments  (Figure 3).

     On coastlines  close to urban and industrial  centers  it is likely that a
sea  level  rise of  about  1  m  over  the next  century will  stimulate massive
expenditure on structures  designed to prevent  submergence  and erosion.  It is
very likely  that where  land has recently  been  reclaimed  from the sea for use
by  large  coastal  populations  (as   in Singapore,  Hong Kong,  and  Tokyo Bay)
strenuous efforts will  be made to retain it,  using  techniques familiar from
the  history  of  the  Netherlands coast.   Where  eroding  beaches  are  valued for
recreation or tourism, as in Australia close  to  the  state capitals and other
seaside towns and  at coastal  resorts in  Africa  and  Asia,  it  is likely that
they will be maintained  by expensive beach renourishment  programs of the kind
already used in some of  these areas.

     Away from such  highly  developed centers,  especially  on the coastlines of
less wealthy countries,   there  may have to  be evacuation  and  abandonment of
coastal  fringes as  submergence  and  erosion  proceed,  and modification  of
developed land  and   water  uses as the  water table  rises  and  soil and water
salinity  increase.   Efforts  will  certainly be made  to prevent  the  sea from
inundating  farmland.   The  Yilan  Plain  in  northeast  Taiwan is an  already-
subsiding coastal area where dykes have been  built  to protect an  intensively
used lowland from marine  invasion  (Hsu  1985).  But  as  submergence proceeds
there  is  a  strong possibility,   already   in  evidence   in  parts  of  the
Philippines, of increasing the use of nearshore waters for mariculture and the
occupation of shallow areas by people who live  on boats and who may eventually
occupy floating villages and towns.

     In Asia, brackish-water fish ponds have  been constructed extensively on
the  fringes  of  deltas and coastal plains, sometimes  Just  behind the mangrove
fringe, sometimes  replacing  it (Figure 4).    On  the  deltaic north  coast of
Java,  fishponds  are  constructed   on   mud   deposited at  river  mouths  by
floodwaters directly after  the  floods disperse, and  before mangroves are able
to  colonize  (Bird  and   Ongkosongo  1980).    On  prograding deltas and coastal
plains, where  such  fish ponds become gradually  farther  from  the  coast,  and
less easy to supply with sea water,  they are progressively converted into rice
fields irrigated with fresh  water  from  rivers.   The effects of sea level rise
in such situations can be Judged with reference to sectors where the coastline
                                      90

-------
    Figure 3.   Village on the narrow sand barrier which borders the subsiding
 lrthern shore of  the Sepik  Delta,  Mew Guinea.   As  submergence  proceeds the
3rrio,- is migrating intermittently landward as the result of occasional storm
            The   village  has  been  repeatedly   rebuilt  on  the  retreating
         Photo:  Eric Bird.
                                     91

-------
     Figure  4.    Intensive use  of  the
ponds)  and   shallow  nearshore   areas
Phillipines.  Photo: Eric Bird
coastal  fringe  (brackish-water  fish
(shellfish  farms)  in   Manila   Bay,
is eroding  (usually because the  river  mouth has  been  diverted,  naturally or
artificially, to some other outlet) and fish ponds are being destroyed (Figure
5).  In such areas, the landward spread of salt water has prompted the conver-
sion of  ricefields  back  to brackish-water  fish  ponds.   Such  changes  raise
socio-economic and  political problems,  for people  who live on eroding sectors
are losing land and  resources,  whereas  those on accreting sectors are gaining
them, and it is difficult to organize equitable redistributions.

     A sea level  rise of 1 m  (3-3  ft)  over  the next century  will thus cause
major problems on the intensively utilized and densely populated Asian coastal
plains—producing coastline recession of  up  to several  kilometers, displacing
coastal villages,  and depriving many people of  their land and resources.   On
the  low-lying  coast  of the Bight  of  Bangkok (Figure  6),  for  example,  the
mangrove  fringe  has been largely  cleared,  the seaward  parts  being converted
into  brackish-water  fish  and   shrimp  ponds  and  salt  pans,  while  landward,
canals  have  been  built  to  bring  fresh  water  to  irrigate  the  rice fields
(Figure 7).  Tide  range there  is up to 2.3 m  (7.6 ft) and a sea level rise of
a  meter on  this gently sloping  coastal plain  could  submerge the whole of the
previous  mangrove  area  and  an  additional  zone  up   to  5  km  (3.2  mi) inland
(Figure 8).  The existing fishponds, shrimp ponds, and salt pans are likely to
be destroyed by marine  erosion,  but the local people will
                                      92

-------
     Figure 5.   Brackish-water  fish ponds  on the  coastline  of  the  Citarum
     ,  northern Java, being  destroyed  by  marine erosion, which  has  developed
as a sequel to the diversion of  the  mouth  of the  river that formerly supplied
Se
-------
     Figure 6.  Coastal  plain  behind the Bight of  Bangkok,  Thailand,  showing
fish  ponds  and some  uncleared  mangrove remnants  behind a narrow  mangrove
fringe.  Photo: Eric Bird
     Figure 7.   Probable  extent of submergence on  the  low-lying  coast at the
head of the Gulf of Thailand if sea level rises 1  m (3.3 ft).

-------
:---.4	M-GVy   Ji
                                                          Jl | Rice fields
                                                          |pl Zone of fish ponds
                                                            J and salt pans
                                                          ?J^ Existing mangroves
       &
            vi'J
         024
                                                THAILAND
                        8   10km
     Figure 8.  Part of  the  low-lying  coastline south  of Bangkok,  Thailand,
showing the natural coastline  in  19^5  (inner limit of mangroves),  the present
features (including areas reclaimed  for fish ponds and rice cultivation),  and
tne predicted  coastline after a  sea   level  rise of  one meter,  assuming  no
c°untermeasures are taken.
CONCLUSION

     The effects of a sea level rise can be deduced theoretically,  or  inferred
     studies  of coastlines  where submergence  is already  in  progress, as  in
s°utheast England (e.g., the Thames estuary), the Netherlands  (e.g.,  the Rhine
Delta),  northeast Italy (e.g., Venice and Ravenna), parts of the  Gulf  coast  of
the United States (e.g., Galveston),  and  Taipei,  Taiwan.   Alternatively,  some
°f the effects may be  deduced  from studies of retreating coastlines where the
recession is due partly or wholly to factors other than  active  submergence,  as
°n parts of the deltaic coastline of northern Java.  There  is a need  for site-
sPecific predictive  studies  of the physical and  ecological consequences  of a
sea level rise  on  various types  of  coastline,  especially  those  that  are  low-
 ying,  densely populated, and  intensively utilized.
                                      95

-------
     The  human  response  to  sea  level  rise  may  be  countermeasures  (where
resources  and  technology  are   capable)  evacuation,  and  adaptation  to  the
changing  coastal  environment.   With the  prospect of a continuing sea  level
rise, some  countries may  decide to  enclose and  reclaim embayments,  such  as
Port Phillip  Bay (Figure 9)  and Botany  Bay in Australia,  and Tokyo  Bay  and
parts of the Inland Sea in Japan, on  the grounds that  the cost of protecting a
shortened, artificial coastline  can be  justified by increased economic yields
from the land gained.  But on the coasts of  less-developed  countries,  the most
likely outcome  is an  intensification  of  use  and  occupance of nearshore  sea
areas.
                                                      I
                                                 MELBOU
PORT PHILLIP  BAY
                Sectors likely to be
                submerged or eroded
                if sea level rises one
                metre
                                                             MORNINGTON
                           POINT
                         LONSDALE
                                        PORTSEA

                                          SORRENTO
     Figure  9.    Port  Phillip Bay,  southeastern  Australia,  showing  sectors
likely to be  submerged  or eroded  if sea level rises  1 m  (3.3  ft).   If the sea
continues to  rise, a  possible response  would be  to build a dam across  the
outlet at Point  Lonsdale,  with canals to the ports of Melbourne  and  Greelong>
and to reclaim the rest of the bay  in  the manner  of the Dutch  polders.
                                       96

-------
REFERENCES

Earth,  M.C., and  J.G.  Titus.   1984.   Greenhouse  effect  and sea  level  rise.
     New York:   Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Bird, E.C.F. 1978.  A geomorphological study of  the  Gippsland  Lakes.  Ministry
     for Conservation,  Victoria,  Australia,  Publication 186.

Bird, E.C.F. 1983.  Changes on spits and  barriers enclosing coastal  lagoons,
     45-53.     Oceanologica  Acta.  Symposium  International  sur  les  Lagunes
     Cotieres.

Bird, E.C.F. 1985.  Coastline changes.  Chichester: Wiley  Interscience.

Bird, E.C.F.   1986.   Man's response  to  changes  in  the  Australian  coastal
     zone.  Man and coastline change, ed.  K.  Ruddle,  in press.

Bird, E.C.F.,  and O.S.R.  Ongkosongo.    1980.    Environmental  changes on  the
     coasts  of  Indonesia.  Tokyo:   United Nations  University.

Bird, E.C.F.,  and M.L.  Schwartz,  eds.  1985.    The  world's  coastline.    New
     York:  Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Bloom,  A.L.  1977.  Atlas  of sea-level curves.    Ithaca,  New York:   Cornell
     University.

Bruun,  P. 1962.  Sea level rise as a  cause of shore erosion.   J_.  Waterways and
     Harbors Div.. Proc. Amer.  Soc. Civil  Engnrs. 88:117-130.

°onn, W.L., W.R.  Farrand,  and M.  Ewing.   1962.   Pleistocene  ice  volumes and
     sea level  lowering. J. Geol.  70:206-214.

^airbridge,  R.W. 1961.  Eustatic changes in sea level. Physics and chemistry of
     the earth. 4:99-185.

Gornitz, V., S. Lebedeff,  and J.  Hansen.   1982.   Global sea level trend in the
     past century.  Science. 215:1612-1614.

Goudie,  A. 1977.  Environmental change. Oxford:   Clarendon Press.

Hoffman,  J.S.   1984.    Estimates   of  future  sea  level  rise,   79-103.    In
     Greenhouse effect and sea level  rise, ed.  M.C. Barth  and J.G.  Titus.   New
     York:  Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Hsu, T.L. 1985.   In The world's coastline,  ed. E.C.F.  Bird and M.L. Schwartz,
     829-831.   New York:  Van Nostrand  Reinhold.

Weatherman,  S.P.   1984.    Coastal  geomorphic  responses  to sea  level  rise:
     Galveston  Bay, Texas,  151-178.   In Greenhouse effect and sea level rise,
     eds. M.C.  Barth and J.G. Titus.  New  York:   Van  Nostrand Reinhold.
                                      97

-------
Mahinda Silva,  A.T.  1986.   Environmental changes,  ecological  conditions, and
     sociological aspects of two lagoon ecosystems  in  southern Sri Lanka.  In
     Man  in  the mangroves,  eds.  E.C.F.  Bird, P.  Kunstadter,  and  Sabhasri.
     Tokyo:  United Nations University.

Neumann, A.C.,  and  I.  Macintyre.    1985.   Reef response to a  sea  level rise:
     Keep-up, catch-up, or give-up.  Proc. 5th Internat.  Coral Reef Congress,
     3:105-110.

Pirazzoli, P.A.   1984.  Secular  trends  of relative sea  level  changes indicated
     by tide-gauge records, 82-85.   Proc.  Internat.  Symp.  Late Quaternary Sea-
     level Changes.  Mar del Plata.

Ruddle, K.,  and R.E.  Johannes.   1985. Traditional knowledge  and management
     systems in  Asia and the Pacific.   Jakarta:   UNESCO Regional Office.

Tija,  H.D.   1970.   Rates  of diastrophic  movement  during  the  quaternary  in
     Indonesia.  Geol. en Mi.lnbouw.  49:335-338.

Veenstra,  H.J. 1970.  Quaternary North Sea coasts.  Quaternaria 12:169-179.
                                      98

-------
Worldwide  Impact of Sea Level
Rise on  Shorelines

Per Bruun
Chairman (Ret) Technical University of Norway
Hilton Head, South Carolina USA
INTRODUCTION

     Sea level is rising around the world.   As Hansen (Volume 1) and others
Point out,  anthropogenic emissions  may  result  in  a climatic warming through
the next few  centuries,  which could overcompensate the natural cooling that
^ight otherwise be expected.   As Thomas  (this volume)  notes,  the warming might
be a threat  to the continued  existence of the Greenland and  the West Antarctic
ice sheets.

     This paper  discusses evidence from tidal gauges and archeology that sea
level has  been rising  in the past centuries.   Next,  it describes methods for
assessing erosion caused by sea  level rise.  It then describes how people have
held back  the sea  in  the  past,  focusing  on  the low  countries of Europe.
finally,  it  describes  the  options  available  to  society for  responding  to
shoreline changes resulting from projected sea level rise.

HISTORIC EVIDENCES OF SEA LEVEL  RISE

     Tide level  recordings tell us  of  sea level movements  over the last 200
years.   For  longer-term  developments, we must seek  the.evidence of such rises
in, for example,  increased flooding  of  low coastal  areas, drowning of valleys
and  shore  features,  including  some ancient  manmade  features,  and  density
currents penetrating further  upstream.    The findings  are not  always easy  to
interpret.    Tectonic  movements,  glacial rebounds,  consolidation  of  softer
Materials in the  ground  and re-balancing of  land masses due  to offshore sedi-
         have interfered  with  the relative movement of land and  sea.   The
     authors  who have  written  about  above-mentioned phenomena come from  a
Variety of   disciplines,  including geology,   geography,  engineering,   and
archeology,  to name a  few.    Other evidence of  sea level rise comes  from
historic records of past construction activities.
                                    99

-------
     Recordings  of  the  events  were   solely   descriptive  rather  than  by
instruments, although  surveys  have been made  to state  the actual situation.
An impressive geophysical review  was given by Fairbridge  (1961)  who referred
to  works by  Marmar  (1948),  Stommel  (1960),  and  Guilcher  (1958).   Others
include Milliman and Emery (1968)  and Emery (1980).

     Important reviews  of tide level fluctuation  are given by U.S.  Dept. of
Commerce  (1983)  for the  United  States'  shores.   The recent  contribution by
Earth and Titus (1984)  was the first to examine future conditions.

     The following text presents a few examples of these reviews,  some of them
tracked down by the author and not known  before (see Bruun  1985).

Early Harbor Works

     The Port of  Alexandria  in Egypt was founded by  Alexander the Great, who
destroyed the ports at Tyre and Sidon.  Alexander built the port by connecting
through reclamation the island of Pharos  (the scene, centuries earlier, of the
great harbor works,  which had by then mostly disappeared)  with the mainland.
This formed two harbors protected by the island, in  which  basins were formed
by  the  construction  of  walls in  the  form  (on  plan)  of semicircles,  the
northeastern basin having an outer mole protecting the single central entrance
channel.  This was a form of  layout that was later  adopted by both Greeks and
Romans.

     The  first  mention of a  lighthouse  for the  benefit of shipping  is that
built upon a rock off  the northeast of the  island of Pharos.  This lighthouse
appears to have been of considerable height and was  circular in plan, tapering
to the top.

     Of  the Greek ports,  perhaps the most  interesting  are.those of Piraeus,
Zea and  Munychia,  Phodes,  and Cnidus.   All  these were natural bays protected
on the  seaward sides  by  moles or  breakwaters.   In  the Mediterranean,  where
there  is  practically  no rise or  fall in water level—and  the earlier Greeks
had apparently not  evolved  any means of drying out the  sites  by  cofferdams—
these  structures  were  all founded  upon  beds  of tipped  impervious material,
which were  built  up  until they reached  the  surface or thereabouts, when they
were leveled to receive the masonry that  formed the superstructures.

     The period of the  Roman Empire provides considerably more information in
regard  to the  construction  of many harbors  that  were built on the coasts of
Italy  and  Sicily,  both  from the  accounts written  by  historians and  from
remains  of  the actual  works.   These works were much more substantial  than
anything previously existing,  both  in design and in  the means and methods of
construction  employed.    For  example,   in  Italy,  as distinct   from  Greece,
natural  bays  that could readily  be formed  into harbors were  scarce,  and the
character of  the works was  therefore  somewhat different.    Moreover,  Roman
cement  was  in general  use,  which  contributed not  a  little to stability and
lasting  qualities;  again,  methods  of  constructing  underwater works  were
evolved, many of which  were founded on piles driven into the sea-bed,  for all
Roman  moles and breakwaters  were constructed  of masonry  founded  at  sea-bed
level.   Many moles  were of arched  formation, probably to avoid the siltation
that in  some places would be  induced by  solid  walls;  and to reduce foundation
work  and masonry  in  exposed situations,  double  arcades  were  formed  some


                                      100

-------
distance apart,  with the  arches  staggered  to  break the  force of  waves but
still allow the passage  of water.   Cellae-covered  recesses  for ships of war,
which protected the vessels from the sun and inclement weather, were a feature
°f many  Roman ports,  but vessels  used for  purely commercial  purposes were
berthed at  marginal quays or moles.

     For all these ancient  ports,  the piers and wharves  today are covered by
2-3 meters  of water.  However,  because  the  structures have deteriorated, this
does not provide quantitatively firm figures for the  amount  of sea level rise
occurring in the last 1,500-3,000  years.

       Ports
     We know little about port development during  the  centuries  following the
downfall of the  Roman  Empire.   Sea  voyages  and trade  undoubtedly continued.
ports were river based;  quays or piers hardly existed  or were uncommon.   The
big  seafarers  for  several  centuries  were the  Vikings, whose  large  fleets
Cabled  them  to  invade  England,  France,   Ireland,  Spain,  and  the  Baltic
countries all the  way  down to Constantinople  (Istanbul).   Next  they crossed
    Atlantic Ocean  to  Iceland, Greenland, and  Vineland (North America).   We
     about their powers from historic accounts  of what  they  accomplished.   But
     s require naval bases  for operation.   We have found  them  during  recent
decades of excavations.

     From archeological  discoveries  in Denmark  and in  the southern part of
Sweden we  know  that the Vikings  built large forts at  rivers and  in fiords.
Their vessels  were probably  moored,  or they may have been beached,  but we have
also  found  large  pile  walls,   for  example,  at  Hedeby,   South  Jutland,
demonstrating  that their vessels, whether built  for commerce  or  for war,  used
Piers for  loading  or  unloading.   Sometimes they  also built  large  submerged
walls or dams from sunken ships,  or  from  piles  across  a navigation channel to
stop enemies from  penetrating into their  harbors.   A  magnificent  example of
    latter is  in Roskilde Fiord on the Island of Zealand in  Denmark.
     The remains of  these  1,000- to  1,500-year-old  Viking structures  do not
Provide direct data on  elevations,  but  some of them were  built  in  a way that
indicates that the water  table must  have  been lower  than it is today.   The
conclusion of the  Danish  National Museum  regarding  water tables is that sea
level about 1,000 years  ago must  have been  1  to 1.5 ra below present  sea level.

^gdimentalogical  Evidence

     Coastal  geomorphologists  observe  the  elevation  of  beach  ridges  and
       ines.  In  emerged condition they  provide evidence of a higher sea level
    ., as may be  seen in Denmark  where strandlines are found in up to about 60
   70  meters elevation) generated  by the postglacial arctic waters.   After
        of  the  ice cap,  the  ground experienced  a rebound effect,  which was
     faster than the sea level rise.  That this situation still  continues was
revealediby Svante Arhenius' famous  drilling of holes  in  vertical  rock walls
°n the Swedish west coast outside Gothenburg.   The holes  were drilled in 1890
^nd are now found  about 0.6 m above present  mean sea level  (MSL).   (Svante
ftr
-------
     On the Skagen Spit,  the northernmost tip of Jutland, the elevation of old
beach  ridges elevated  by  the  glacial  rebound  decreases  to  the  north  as
deposits  get younger.    One  of these  changes  in  elevation occurs  rather
abruptly,  revealing a slowdown in the relative  movement  of land and sea about
2,500 years ago,  demonstrating a  rise in  sea level elsewhere.

     Two  examples  of sedimentation provide   indirect  confirmation  of  the
mechanics  of  the sea/land  interaction  process.    At  Penang,  West  Malaysia,
rivers discharge known quantities of sediments  on  the estuary bottom.   If the
area of the  estuary bottom  (+500 km )  is multiplied  by a sea  level  rise of
0.002 m/yr one arrives at 1  million  m^,  which  corresponds  to the annual river
discharge  of sediments.   This is consistent with  the observation  that water
depths have not  changed in the last  200 years.

     The situation  on  the 140-km pocket  shore  on the South  Coast  of  Iceland
between Porlakshofn and Dyrholaey is described  by Bruun (1986).  The discharge
of river  sediments  of sand  size is  4.5  million nwyear.    This quantity is
balanced by  deposits of  0.0035  m/yr (which corresponds to  the  recorded  sea
level  rise  in  the  Port  of  Reykjavik)  on  the  140-km  long,  9,000-m  wide
platform,  of which  2,000  m  is beach area,  extending  to  a 50-m  to  60-m depth
where there is a steepening of the offshore  bottom leaving  the impression of a
deposit boundary slope.  Grain size  distributions  confirm  the existence of an
equilibrium condition.  A  forth  horizontal  rock platform  is  found  at  a 100-m
depth, possibly  an abrasion platform from a  lower sea  level during an extended
glacial period.

Tidal Gauges

     As described by Hicks (1985):

      Tidal datums are the fundamental base  from which most  coastal  and
      marine boundaries are  determined.   They are  also  the  fundamental
      references  for sounding and  depiction  of the  shoreline on  all
      nautical charts.  As such,  they are intrinsic to the  activities of
      coastal engineering,  surveying,  hydrography, and  photogrammetry.
      The  most important tidal datums are defined,  amplified, and their
      specific uses listed in abbreviated outline form.  The definitions
      are  in terms of the procedures used in their computation.

           As "tide authority" (in the international and  legal sense) of
      the  United States of America,   the National Ocean Service (NOS) of
      the  National  Oceanic  and Atmospheric  Administration  (NOAA),  U.S.
      Department  of Commerce, has  statutory  responsibility  for  tidal
      measurements,   analyses,  predictions,  and  datum  determinations.
      Responsibility for  tidal datums included the development and  any
      subsequent modifications of the methods of computation.

           The method  used  for   the  computation of  a  tidal  datum is
      specified  in the official definition of that  datum.   The purposes
      of these "method definitions"  are  to:

           •  Ensure uniformity of computation  among oceanographers
                                      102

-------
           e  Ensure uniformity  of computation among  the  various tidal
              regimes of the U.S.

           •  Provide for comparisons with foreign datums

           •  Enable outside scientific  verification  of results through
              duplication

           •  provide precise  terminology for judicial  and legislative
              acceptance   in   cases   involving   coastal   and   marine
              boundaries.

     Hicks gives  twelve  references of recordings  of  sea levels.   Tide level
Recordings, however, have  been undertaken on a larger  scale  for some decades
Only.  Exceptions are the  Dutch  and  British  recordings,  which date back a few
centuries;   however,    the  accuracy    of   those   tidal   observations   is
Questionable.   In Holland, the  influence  of sea level  rise  is  reinforced by
subsidence due  to the  soft underground  caused by the large  Rhine,  Maas,  and
Scheldt rivers.

     In the United States  the trend  of relative  sea level  rise is fairly well
documented by surveys  on  all  shores (Hicks 1980; Lisle 1982;  U.S.  Dept.  of
Commerce  1983;  Nummedal 1983,  for  the  Louisiana Coast, are among  the  most
important  contributions).   Sea  level  rise during the latest decades  ranges
from 1  to 4 mm/yr depending upon  the  location.   The subsidence in Louisiana is
about 10 mm/yr.    On  the East  Coast the rise is 2-3.5  mm/yr,  on  the  Gulf,  2-3
Nro/yr,  and on the Pacific,  about 2 mm/yr.  Rises for  east  and west  coasts of
Canada  are similar.  Germany  has kept good records of  the  rises on  the North
s«a coast  (Siefert 1984), as may be  seen  from  Table  1.  The conclusion of the
Siefert paper reads as  follows:

           The knowledge of the probable development of  the water level
           on the German North Sea coast—in general on  all flat coasts
           --is   of  greatest  importance  for  coastal   engineering.    In
           Germany an increase of  MThw (mean  high water)  of  25 cm  per
           century has  been taken as  a  basis  for  dimensioning of coastal
           protection   constructions   (e.g.   dikes    or  storm   surge
           barrages).   If instead one had to reckon with a  rise of MThw
           of 2   m or more  in  the next 100  years and  with  at  least  the
           same   increase  of  the   storm  surge   levels,   all  coastal
           protection  works would  be ineffective.   It is doubtful  that
           an elevation of the dikes for such a water -level  rise would
           be possible   everywhere.    As  one  can  conclude  from  the
           development  of MThw at all locations on the German  North  Sea
           coast  for  the  last  400  years   in  connection   with   the
           development  of temperature in  Central  England, an increase of
           2 m or more  would be thinkable in the  case  of an increase of
           the temperature  of about 4°C.   The increase  of temperature is
           assumed to be 1°C since the culminating-point of the  "Little
           Ice Age".  In the same period  MThw rose about 1 m.

                Therefore it is necessary to  intensify  investigations in
           order to predict the  probable development  of the global  sea
           level as well  as that  of certain  coastal  sections  for  the
                                     103

-------
           next  100  years  as exactly  as  possible.
           research are deemed necessary:
Three  routes of
           1)  One has  to analyze all  the factors responsible  for the
               development of water level in the ocean and on the coasts
               as exactly  as possible.   This demands an  extensive and
               close  co-operation  of  the  different  scientific  disci-
               plines of  climatology,  meteorology,  oceanology,  glaci-
               ology, geodesy and  coastal engineering.   This co-opera-
               tion has to  be international.   Coastal  engineers should
               contact  such  projects   as   the  International  Climate
               Research Program  and  the  Project  No.  200 of  the Inter-
               national   Geological   Correlation   Program   (Sea-Level
               Correlation  and   Applications).    The   results of  these
               projects are of greatest practical importance for coastal
               engineering.

        Table 1.   Trends in Sea Level Along the German North Sea Coast

                            Mean High Water       Mean Low Water


Emden
Wilhelmshaven
Cuxhaven
Busum
Husum
Dagebull


(1857)
(1873)
(1843)
(1871)
(1870)
(1873)
till 1955
1
0.25
0.23
0.25
0.22
0.30
0.28
1873-1955
2
0.23
0.23
0.24
0.21
0.28
0.28
1956-1983
2
0.54
0.37
0.51
0.62
0.63
0.65
1956-1983
4
-0.33
-0.15
-0.21
-0.25
-0.09
-0.32
              Slope "b" of the regression lines y = a + bx of mean high
              water in three different periods and of mean low water in
              the last period.

     From these figures it appears that  high  tides  apparently have risen from
2 to 6 mm/yr, while low tides  have dropped  1-3 mm/yr; therefore,  tidal ranges
have increased.  The large differences occur  during the 1956-1983 period when
the means of high and  low  tide levels have increased 2-5 mm/yr.

     In Denmark the rebound  from  the glacial period  was  believed to dominate
until recently.  The latest decades, however,  show  that relative  sea level is
rising in the entire country,  being  highest  (1-2 mm/yr) in the southwest part,
but close to  0  at the northernmost  part  of  Jutland.   At the  tip of Jutland,
the Skagen Spit, the apparent 3-mm rise may  be related to the consolidation of
thick layers of silt  upon which the spit grew  out  by littoral drift deposits
in water depths of about 200 m in  "the Norwegian trench."

     In Norway  it  appears that the Oslo fiord area of granite and  old lavas
may still be  rising in comparison with sea level.  The  rest  of the Norwegian
coast up to North Cape seems  to be  in  a  neutral situation,  but at some places
sea level is  slightly  rising  compared to land  despite  the  fact that glaciers
were roaming  here only about  10,000  years  ago.   Movements range from  a  1-2
                                     104

-------
       sea  level  rise  in  the  northern part  to a  3-4  mm/yr land  level rise
(compared to sea level) in the Oslo fiord areas.

     In Sweden, glacial rebound is still  very predominant,  as shown in Figure
1- The  southern  shore  of  Sweden,  however,  now experiences  a sea  level rise.
The situation  in  Iceland  is  described by the  already-mentioned  recordings in
^eykjavik,  which show a rise  of 3.5 mm/yr.

     In Holland  and  Belgium,  sea  level  is  rising  2-3  mm/yr (Table 2).   The
general situation  in northwest Europe is seen in Figure 1.  The  glacial re-
bound in Fenno-Scandinavia is  still active,  but not along most of the shores.
Table 2.   Average Rate  of  Rise of  Relative Mean Sea  Level (MSL), and  Mean
           High Water  Level  (HW),  Mean  Low Water Level  (LW) and  Mean  Tidal
           Difference (TD)  in cm per  Century in  Holland  and Belgium
Station

^ostende
flushing
Terneuzen
Hansweert
Bath
Zierikzee
H°ok of Holland
JJmuiden
Jen Helder
Harlingen
°elfzijl
MSL

22

17
19
21
16
16
16
HW

17
33
40
no
44
26
22
24
15
27
21
LW

5
19
18
10
16
5
16
18
7
10
7
TD

12
13
22
30
28
21
6
6
8
17
14
period
used
1925-1980
1900-1980
1900-1980
1900-1980
1900-1980
1900-1980
1900-1980
1900-1980
1933-1980
1933-1980
1900-1900
          Figure 1.   Changes  in  Relation  to  Sea Level  (cm per  year)
                                     105

-------
     It has  not  been possible  to  secure data  from  the USSR.   In Japan, sea
level  has  been  observed  (e.g., in  the  Osaka  Bay)  and  is  of the  order of
magnitude  of 2  mm/yr.  On  the  Northern Island,  settling  takes  place  to a
considerable extent due to the extraction of gas and water.  In China the  rise
in  sea  level has  been  noticed mainly  because  of the  increasing  problems of
saltwater intrusion in the rivers.

     In summary, sea  level is  rising  worldwide at  a rate of  from  2 to 4 mm
annually in the areas we  have  discussed.   However,  it appears  to be stable in
a number of places, such  as  in the vicinity of coral reefs in  the Pacific and
Australia.   As a result,  most  authors  estimate  the  eustatic rate of rise at 1
to  1.5 mm/yr.   There  is some  indication  of an  increase in  the rise, but the
evidence is not too clear at this point.

THE IMPACT OF SEA LEVEL RISE ON SHORELINES

Erosion

     It has long been known  that high  tides,  particularly  storm tides, can be
very destructive.   The influence  of the eustatic rise of  sea  level on shore
stability was "rediscovered" in the early 1960s.

     The Bruun  Rule of  erosion (Bruun  1962),  so  named  by  American coastal
geomorphologists (Schwartz  1967,  1968,  1980), concerns a  long-term  budget of
onshore/offshore movement of material.   The rule is  based on the assumption of
a closed material  balance system between (1) the beach and nearshore and (2)
the offshore bottom profile.   This topic is  dealt  with extensively  in theory
(Hallermeier 1972; Allison  1980; Bruun 1980) and through  observations  in the
field (Bruun 1954a,b, 1962,  1980;  Dubois  1976;  Fisher 1980; Hands 1980).  The
"rule" has  sometimes  been used rather  indiscriminately without realizing its
limitations.  One should always remember that it is  basically two-dimensional*
but it is almost always applied three-dimensionally.

     The  theory has  now  been  tested  extensively   in  the  field  (e.g.,  by
Schwartz 1967;  DuBois 1976; Fisher  1980; Hands 1980; and others).  Its overall
validity seems unquestionable  when boundary conditions are  well defined, but
this  is  not  always the  case.    Its  mathematics  has  been  proven   for  two-
dimensional  conditions  (Allison 1980,   1981).   The  difficulty  lies  in clear
definitions of boundaries  in  relation  to the composition  of the materials of
which the  shores  are  built up,  usually sand particles decreasing in size as
distance offshore  increases,  until silt-  and  perhaps clay-sized  particles
finally prevail.   Such fine materials may originate  from erosion of the shore,
but may also originate from rivers or  from  deserts  and volcanoes as windblown
dust (Bruun 1980; Hands 1980).

     As explained  above,  the  theory of  the  influence of  sea  level  rise on
erosion  is   proposed   as  being   two-dimensional,   but   nature   is  three-
dimensional.  This in turn means that  in practice one must consider a certain
uninterrupted length offshore,  when  the material transport  is  contained in a
"box", xyz,  where x  is  the  distance   offshore  from a  defined point  on the
shoreline,  y, the  length  of the box along  the shore, and  z,  the depth from a
defined water  table.   The  numerical material balance  in  and out of two x-z
sections y  meters apart  is initially  assumed  to  be zero.   If there  is no
balance between  the  two  quantities,  this must  be  considered in  the total
material balance equations.  There are  two  boundary  y-z sections,  one located


                                     106

-------
°n the  beach or  in the  dunes,  the  other at  a certain  water depth,  which
separates   the  "nearshore  drift"  from   the   "offshore   drift"   in  the  x-
direction.    On  the beach,  the effect  of  wind-drift may  then  have to  be
added.   It  is usually  negligible,  but  it may  in  some  cases present  a  non-
negligible  quantity.   The  outer y-z  boundary  is  more  difficult  to  define,
Because there is  no clear distinction between the limit  of  exchange  between
beach and  offshore drifts of material.   In practice these  limits are "fading-
out ."

     Often   the   term  "wave  base"  is used  for material  agitation  on  the
bottom.   Recent  research  by Hands  (1980)  and Hallermeier (1972)  attempts  to
Present rational  methods for calculation of the  limits of  active agitation  of
the sand bottom  and the long-term  erosion rates based on long-term rises  of
sea level.   The  short-term  "seasonal" limit may be close  to  depth 2Hb,  where
Hb is the height of the highest breaking  waves.  The "wave  base"  is  thereby
related  to the capacity  or limit of  the wave action in agitating  the bottom
material "actively,"  which  in  a  statistical  sense  depends upon  the  time
interval considered (Hallermeier  1972).   A "five-year wave  base"  obviously may
n°t be the same as a "fifty-year  base."

     In  addition  to this,  there  is  the problem of  diffusion  of material along
the bottom  and  other  boundary  layer  phenomena (Bruun  1980).   The original
theory  (Bruun  1962),  however,  is  based  on  a quantitative  two-dimensional
balance between the beach  and  the nearshore and offshore  bottom and there will
be a certain transition  area between "nearshore" and "offshore" adjustments  to
a change in  sea level.  If  the physical  forces do  not change in the nearshore
apea, the equilibrium-balance  condition  apparently  will  be  maintained.   But
the situation may be different  in the  offshore area, where  forces and supplies
of> materials are  very different  from  those governing  the  nearshore area.  No
equiiibrium  balance  situation  needs  to  exist  in  the offshore area,  where
QUrrents are offshore-originated.   Bottom sediments in movement are clay and
silt, occasionally  fine  sand   where  currents  are  strong  enough to  carry the
          Current-generated ripple  marks have been found  at  very great depths
   g.,  at  5,000 ft (1,500 m) on  the Blake Plateau),  which  include indications
   scour due to current  movement  over  shells.

     Depending upon  the  grain  size,  the  "base" may  extend  to shallower  or
     r water.  This refers to open sea  coasts, where sediments of silt and
      size  may   be   carried   long   distances   in  suspension   before  being
^Posited.    In defining  the area of  exchange between nearshore  and offshore
^ifts,  one  therefore has  to consider  the grain sizes and  materials of certain
°haracteristics  available on the shore.    The finest-parts of  this material,
^hich may  stay in suspension  for long periods,  therefore  have  to  be included
in the  materials balance equations.   This refers  to a  certain depth beyond
which fines  may   still  be  transported  to  much deeper  water for  deposition
(Bruun 1980;  Hands 1980).

     The ultimate limit for movement  characterized  by threshold  velocities  is
     ssed  by Bruun  (1985,  1986)   based  on  research by  Losada  and  Desire
(1985).    The results  from Iceland  mentioned  by  Bruun  (1986)  point  in the
          of ultimate depth

                                 d  * 3.5  Hs
                                  1
                                      107

-------
where Hs then refers to wave  heights occurring once, or over a certain number
of hours, every 1, 10,  20, 50, 100, and 500 years.

     Bruun  (1962,  1983)   points  out  that  his two-dimensional  theory depends
upon a  "closing  depth" for exchange of material  between  the offshore bottom
and the shore.  It must also  be  adjusted for grain sizes that will eventually
wind up  far offshore  due to  their small  size  and consequent  slow settling
velocities (i.e.,  silts and clays).  For three-dimensional applications, major
adjustments  may   become   necessary,  particularly  when features   like  tidal
inlets, canyons,  and other "sinks" of materials enter the  balance picture.
The report by Titus  et al. (1985)  on  the  erosion at Ocean City, Maryland, is
remarkable because it  emphasizes the great importance  of  sea level rise on a.
long unabstructural shore.

     A quantification of  erosion caused by the rise in sea level is attempted
by Bruun and Schartz  (1985).  Sea level rise may contribute from 10$ to 100$ to
the total erosion or from 1 to 6 nH/m yr.  If erosion is not caused by natural
or artificial inlets, breakwaters, groins,  or sea walls, the sea level rise is
the only explanation for  the  occurring erosion.   Figures  2-5 are examples of
erosion where  sea level  rise has  been  the major  contributor.  Examples were
taken from Queensland  in  Australia, Dajeng Bay  in  northeast  China, Kerala in
southwest India,  and Kamchatka in the USSR.   Shoreline recessions are of the
order of 0.3 rn/yr.   If sea level rises 1.5 m  by the year  2100,  shoreline re-
cession will  be  about  150 meters.   For   the  lower bay lagoon,  estuary,  and
other tidelands such development may approach  the catastrophic.  Huge areas in
Bangladesh, Brazil, China, Egypt, Iraq, Iran,  India, Lagos, Nigeria, and areas
on the U.S. East  and  Gulf coasts will be flooded.

     Erosion of shores  is a  worldwide  phenomenon.   Shores always attempt to
adjust  their  condition   to   the  impact  of   the   acting   forces,  thereby
establishing an  "equilibrium  condition."   But  why  do they  then  continue_to
erode?  There is  no other explanation than that sea level is rising.

     The author  has  observed  erosion in  many  countries all over  the world-
Table 3 gives a  record of his experiences, listing six different reasons for
erosion, three "natural"  and three "man-induced."  Sea level rise is listed as
a reason in  all  cases,  either because no  other  reason  could  be  given for the
erosion of uninterrupted  shorelines of extended  length or  that  sea level was
known to be rising and  consequently erosion must result.

     Another "natural"  reason is  subsidence  caused  by the  consolidation of
soft materials,  such  as that which occurs in Holland; the Po-estuary in Italy*
part of India;  Louisiana,  USA; and elsewhere.   Subsidence could,  however, als°
be caused by the extraction of oil  and/or  gas  as it occurs in Japan (Hokaido)
and California (Long Beach).   Some  areas may  experience large- or small-scale
tectonic movements related to fault lines.
                                      108

-------
Figure 2.  Erosion in Queensland, Gold Coast, Australia (1985)
                              109

-------
Figure 3.  Erosion at Dajeng Bay,  China
Courtesy:  Tinjang University (1984)
                    110

-------
^holograph showing beach  erosion  at Punnapra, Kerala   (b) Photograph showing how the coconut trees were being up-
aur'ng the Monsoon of 1967.                              rooted at Punnapra,  Kerala due to beach erosion (1967).
 "otograph shewing erosion problem at a beach at Trivan-  (d) Photograph showing the  uprooted ccconut trees at Vypcen
 um, Kprala  Hnrino the- Mrmcr»rvn nf TQ76                  Kerala due to the terminal  effect rf a seawall.
Kerala during the Monsoon  of 1976.
      Figure 4.   Erosion  on  the Southeast Coast  of  India,  Kerala  State
                    Source:   NIO,  GOA,  1983
                                               111

-------
Figure 5.   Erosion in the USSR,  Kamsjatka (1962)
                       112

-------
Table 3.  Overview of Causes of Erosion Worldwide
Country
Algeria
Argentina
Australia
Belgia
Brazil
Canada
China
Columbia
Denmark
Ecuador
Egypt
France
Holland
Iceland
Ireland
India
Iran
Israel
Italy
Japan
Lebanon
Malaysia
Mexico
Nigeria
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Norway
Pakistan
Portugal
Saudi Arabia
Spain
Sweden
Sri Lanka
Tripoli
Turkey
UK
USA
USSR
Venezuela
West Germany
I 40
NATURAL
Sea Level
Rise
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
40
Sub-
sidence



X



X
X


X


X
X





anti


(x)


X
7
Tidal
Inlets
X
X
X
X


X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X

X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
28
MAN- INDUCED
Navig .
Channels
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
37
Man-made
Structures
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X

X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
33

Mining











X




X










2
                      113

-------
     The following are other causes of erosion:

           •  Tidal entrances  interrupt  the  normal  littoral  longshore
              drift  causing   erosion  because  they   discharge  shore
              material in the bay and/or  in the  ocean.   Tidal entrances
              accounted for 28 out of 40 cases in the 40 countries where
              erosion  was  observed  by  the  author;  some of  these cases
              were very severe (Bruun 1978).

           •  Navigation channels,  like the tidal  entrances  upon which
              they were often based, constitute littoral barriers to the
              normal  drift  by accumulating  materials  that  otherwise
              would drift  to downdrift  shores thereby  contributing  to
              their stability.

           •  Mantnade  structures  such as breakwaters,  jetties,  groins,
              and other shore-perpendicular structures are also barriers
              to the longshore drift and have  also caused severe damages
              to  downdrift  shores.   It  can   safely  be  said that  the
              coastal  protective  groins have  caused  more erosion  than
              accretion.  According  to  the  author's experience,  manmade
              structures  (listed  in  Table  3)  are second  only  to  sea
              level rise and  head  of natural  tidal inlets as  causes  of
              erosion.

           •  Mining for  heavy minerals  has  caused damages  in  several
              countries until the  adverse effects were observed.   Mining
              also  includes  extruction  of sand,   gravel,  and  stones.
              Such operations are  now largely  prohibited, but they still
              occur in countries where  the  problems they cause have not
              yet been realized.

     Short-term erosion events of  a severe or  extreme  nature usually catch
eye of the public.  To evaluate occurrences of rapid dune erosion due to stor"1
tides, like hurricanes  and  typhoons, the large-scale experiments by  Veiling
(1983),  Vellinga  and  Bruun  (1984),  Vellinga  et al.  (1985)  and  van  de Graa*
(1986) are  important  for assessing  events of  an extreme  nature for  whicl1
preparedness is warranted.
     In summary, erosion due to sea  level  rise  is  obvious.   Compared to
reasons,  particularly the manmade, it  is less severe,  but as it occurs almost
everywhere,  it undoubtedly counts  for  the  largest part of  erosion worldwide*
It is  therefore very  unfortunate  that  we may expect  (during the next sev
decades)  an accelerated rise  in sea level.

Shoreline Recession

     Shoreline recession can  be expected on the  ocean shore as a result of
level  rise.   The  actual  shoreline  recession depends upon  the  exposure,
offshore profile-steepness, and the  character of the material  that  builds UP
the shore and the offshore bottom.

     One may  get  a general impression  of  the  rate of shoreline recession
examining the following data  which are representative of recession  rates
exposed shores like those of  the Atlantic,  the  Pacific,  and the Indian Oceans*


                                     114

-------
            Rise per year       Shoreline Recession per year

                1 cm              1-1.5 m     (4-5 ft)
                2 cm              2-3.0 m     (7-10 ft)
                3 cm              3-4.5 m    (10-15 ft)
               10 cm            10-15.0 m    (33-50 ft)

     These  numbers  represent  the volume  of  material  lost  to  the sea or  the
       needed to maintain a  status  quo with respect to erosion.   The  figures
sPeak for themselves, giving an  impression  of the severity of  the problem we
ar
-------
midst of  a waste of  water.   It was  impossible  to say whether
the country  belonged  to the land or  to  the sea.   "They try to
warm their  frozen  bowels by burning mud,  dug  with their hands
of the earth and dried  to  some  extent in the wind more than in
the sun, which one hardly ever sees.

No doubt  the mud  Pliny refers to was  the peat which was found
in the  "wolds," or  swamps,  some  distance  south  of  the  clay
marshes,  where  the artificial mounds had  been  made.   In all
they built  1,260  of  these  mounds  in the  northeastern  part of
the Netherlands, an area of a mere 60 x 12 miles.  Further East
there are more of  them in East Friesland.   The  areas  of the
mounds themselves vary  from 5 to 40 acres; they rise sometimes
to a height of 30 feet above normal sea level.  The contents of
a single mound may be up to a million yards.

They built  their  mounds on the  shores of  the  creeks in which
the tide  ebbed and flowed.  In  their scows they went (in their
language  in  which the  roots  of so many English  words  can be
found):  "uth mitha ebbe, up mitha flood," out with the ebb, up
with the  flood.   The tide bore them towards the peat regions,
or perhaps  to  the  woods still farther inland  and  then brought
them  back.    Or they went out  with  the  ebb  in  the  morning
towards the  sea,  where they gathered  their  food,  and returned
in the evening with the incoming tide.

The Coastal Dutch have  now  lived 24 centuries  in their marshes
and of  these the first 20  or 21 were spent in peril.   It was
not  until  1600  or  1700  that  some  reasonable security  from
flooding was achieved.  During these long treacherous centuries
the artificial mounds made their survival possible'.

It was a  work which might  be  compared with the building of the
pyramids.    The pyramid  of Cheops   has  a  content  of 3,500,000
cubic yards,  that of Chephren  3,000,000 and  that of Mycenium
400,000 cubic  yards.    The  amount  of clay  carried  into  the
mounds  of  the  northeastern  part   of the  Netherlands can  be
estimated at 100,000,000 cubic yards.

In Egypt  it was a great and  very  powerful  nation which built
the pyramids throughout a  series of dynasties.   The aim was to
glorify the Pharaohs.  With us it was a struggling people,  very
small  in  number and  often decimated, patiently  lifting  their
race above  the dangers  of the  sea,  creating  large monuments,
not in stone, but in native clay.

In this Lex Frisionum of  802  there is not  yet  any mention of
seawalls,   but  the  first attempts  at  dike building  must  have
been  made  shortly  afterwards.     Frisian  manuscripts  still
extant, dating  from  the early  Middle Ages, deal  chiefly  with
the following three points:   First,  the  right  of the people to
freedom, all of them, "the bern and the unbern."  Secondly, the
"wild Norsemen" whose invasions took place roughly from 800 to
1000, and thirdly:  the Zeeburgh or Seawall.
                             116

-------
         This novel  means  of defence  against the  sea by  means of  a
         continuous clay wall  was called a  Burgh,  or stronghold.   The
         people  were  apparently   very  proud of  this seaburgh,  because
         they described it in poetical language as "the  Golden Hop,"  the
         Golden  Hoop.

         ...This is also  the Right of  the  Land to make and  maintain  a
         Golden  Hoop  that  lies all around our country where the salt  sea
         swells  both  by day and by night.

     The  spade,  the  hand  barrow,  and  the  fork were the instruments used  for
Diking,  the  fork presumably for   the  grass  turfs  which  were  used  to heighten
    dikes and make  them stronger.   Despite  the tremendous  efforts the  sea  was
    strongest.

         This was  due partly  to  our  insufficient  technical skill  and
         partly  to  lack of co-operation.  For  a single night,  Dec.  14th
         1287,  the  officials  and  priests  estimated that  50,000  people
         had  been drowned  in  the  coastal district between Stavoren  and
         the  Ems.   This is a large number considering that this was  the
         area where so many  dwelling  mounds could be used as places of
         refuge.

   The advances  and successes have been tied to a  few names.   Says van  Veen:

         We  often  wondered  who   was  the  master  engineer  who  created
         marvellous Great  Holland  Polder,  south of Dordrecht,  the work
         which had  included  the damming off of the tidal mouth  of  the
         river Maas,  and the leading of that river  into the Rhine.  This
         proved  to  be William I.   He had already finished  that gigantic
         undertaking  by 1213.  The polder  was  destroyed in  1421  by  the
         St.  Elisabeth's flood, described in a former chapter.   William
         was  a man  of great conceptions.  He surrounded  the  entire area
         of  Holland-Proper  with  strong  dikes  and  made  several  canals
         intended  to  drain  the   vast  moors.   They  also  served  as  a
         splendid network of shipping  canals.   It  is likely that he made
         the  dikes  around  the Zeeland  islands Walcheren  and  Schouwen
         too, and that he established  the still-existing  administrations
         for  the  upkeep of these  islands.  The other part  of his  clever
         and  amazing   reclamation  and construction  programme cannot be
         described here, but it is very  clear that he  knew  the geography
         of his  county by heart.   No maps as yet existed!

     The  earliest reference  to the art  of accelerating the natural rate of
     tion  is   the   manuscript   "Tractaet  van    Dijckagie"   (Treatise  on
   ebuilding), written by  the Dutch dikemaster Andries Vierlingh  between 1576
    1579.  Vierlingh  discusses the construction of "cross-dams" on mudflats
     are not yet dry  at  low water.   In this connection he also  advises that
    ships should be  sunk  and  earth dumped  on  the  top of  them so as to make
          islands or  flats  which  should  hold back the silt and  sand suspended
^  the  water.  These  islands  should  subsequently  be connected with low  dams.
 ^though  this method  has not been used commonly,  it is known  that shipwrecks
 *V  been used at numerous places  to close dike breaches.   These wrecks  formed
    basis for the  fill material  which  was  secured with  mats or brushwood.
                                     117

-------
Vierlingh, however, was much against  closing  of dike breaches with shipwrecks
due to  the  non-homogenity they created in  the  dike structure.  Nevertheless,
this method  was  widely used over  a  long  period of  time,  not only in Holland
but in the (at that time Danish) Schleswig-Holstein.

     Vierlingh was found to be a real master of the dikes and waters, a man of
great ability  and spirit - one  of  the  greatest  of  his  kind.   Luckily the
greater part of his manuscript has survived.  Its ancient picturesque style is
a  joy  to every  hydraulic engineer.    This  remarkable book  already  shows the
special  vocabulary  of  the  Dutch  diking  people  in  all  its  present-day
richness.  In some ways it is even richer.

     His advice  is simple and  sound.   The leading thought is:  Water
be compelled by any 'fortse' (force), or it will return that fortse onto

     This is the principle of streamlines.  Sudden changes in curves or cross-
sections must  be  avoided.   It is the law  of  action  and reaction.  And truly »
this fundamental law of hydraulics  must  be thoroughly absorbed by any one who
wants to be a master of tidal rivers.

     Andries  Vierlingh was a  genius.     If  we  had followed  his  advice on
streamlining,  we  would have  been better  off  today.   His protection  was the
streamlined  dike.    It  offered  storm   tide  protection  but not necessarily
erosion protection unless the dike was provided with a hard surface.  And even
so,  erosion  might continue below or  in  front of the hard surface due to the
combined action  of waves  and currents.    To  push the  currents  away,  current
breakers or  groins  were  then introduced.  The  hard  surface  on the dike was *
revetment with a  gentle  slope reflecting  little  wave  energy,  and so it stil-
ls  in  Holland, where  vertical walls have  long  been  banned.   The groin worked
well in certain areas, where  currents and waves carried considerable material
as  they still do on  some  parts of the  Dutch coast  and  in  Denmark (Bruufl
1984).   If  not,  they  were of little importance or only  of  value as a kind of
toe protection for the dike.  Experiences elsewhere are, of course, similar.

PLANNING FOR SEA LEVEL RISE ON THE OCEAN SHORES

     We must  accept that  sea level  in all probability  is going to accelerate
its  rise.   Consequently,  the beach and  bottom profiles must  adjust to a neV
situation.   As a result  erosion will occur.   Titus (1984)  characterizes the
issue as follows:

      Ocean beach resorts in the United States have always faced erosion
      and  storm  damage.     At   first,   these   risks  were  accepted  as
      inevitable.   Development   was  generally sparse,  and  people often
      built  relatively inexpensive  cottages  along  the  ocean  that they
      could afford to  lose.   When the occasional severe storm destroyed
      these  houses  and eroded   the  beach, replacement  structures were
      frequently  built farther  inland to maintain the original distance
      from the shore.
                                      118

-------
      After World War II,  beaches became more popular and were developed
      more densely than before.  The  resulting  increases in real estate
      values enabled greater numbers of communities to justify expensive
      engineering solutions  to maintain  their  shorelines.   Frequently
      subsidized by the federal government,  the  practice of stabilizing
      shorelines replaced  the  previous  custom  of accepting  erosion  as
      inevitable.

      The projected  rise in sea level poses a fundamental question:   how
      long should these communities  hold back the sea?   In the  decades
      ahead,  the  costs  of shoreline  protection  will rise  dramatically
      and the  relative  efficiencies  of various  measures will  change.
      But without such efforts, a 1 ft  rise  would  erode  most shorelines
      over  100  ft,   threatening  recreational use of  both beaches  and
      adjacent  houses.  Even under  the  low scenario, this  could  happen
      by  2025.

      Although  sea  level  is not expected  to rise  rapidly until after
      2000,  resort  communities may  have to  consider  its  consequences
      much  sooner.     After  the  next  major   storm,   in   particular,
      homeowners whose properties are destroyed will decide  whether  and
      how to rebuild; and  local governments  will decide whether  or  not
      to  let all of them  rebuild,  and which options are  appropriate  to
      address   the  storm-induced  erosion.     How  well  a   community
      ultimately adapts  to  sea level rise  will  depend  largely  on  the
      direction  it takes when it reaches this  crossroads.

,    Quantification  of erosion  due to  sea level rise  is of course  difficult as
 ne  rise-induced erosion  is  mixed with  other agents of  erosion.   Bruun and
         (1985)  made an attempt and  show  that beach erosion due to sea level
     may amount  to  about  *\5%-20%  of the  total erosion  occurring  on heavily
     g  shores.   The above-mentioned  report by Titus et al.  (1985) (for Ocean
    , MD),  however,  demonstrates  that  sea level rise  could become the major
     of  the  erosion  on   extended  shores  far from  tidal  inlets  or  other
 sinks."  See also Everts (1985) and Bruun (1986c).

     Nourishment
    Bruun  (1973)  after  having  stated  that  future coastal  protection must
       beach restoration  and  maintenance  as well as storm tide protection by
     or revetted dunes stated the following:

     In  future coastal   protection  one  must think  large.    It  will
     therefore  develop  as  a  function  of  the  combined  political,
     administrative and  technical  structure.  There will  be little or
     no use  for "one-man shows."    Large groups and  large  areas  will
     have to be accomodated - by large scale measures.   Needs will be
     concentrated  on  protective  and  recreational projects   and  all
     combinations  thereof.    Pressure  will  increase  by  the  need  for
     recreational  beaches.    Protection  will  be  achieved  simultane-
     ously.    The question  of which protective  measure  will  be  most
     practical under such circumstances may be answered by just looking
     at  Tables   5-10  which  clearly   demonstrate   that  artificial
     nourishment with  suitable  material  offers  the  best  large-scale


                                     119

-------
      protection.    This,  however,   does   not  mean  that  it  always
      suffices.  It may need support from dikes and/or sea walls because
      of the possibility of storm  surges  or it may need groins to break
      scouring  currents running  close to  shore.   One main  technical
      advantage  associated  with artificial nourishment  is  that  it is
      "smooth" and  "streamlined"  and therefore not only  has no adverse
      leeside effects,  but,  on the  contrary,  benefits adjoining shores
      by a  gradual release of material.    Other  measures,  particularly
      groins and offshore breakwaters,  have definite  adverse effects on
      neighbouring shores.   The importance of streamlining is obvious.

What  shall  we  then  do?    We  shall  improve  our  artificial  nourishment
technology.   For that  we  need (a)  suitable sand, as coarse as  possible of
coarser than the beach  sand (but  sand  must  not be so coarse that it generates
a partly reflecting  beach which could  become dangerous to  bathers);  (b) the
sand  must  be  placed  by equipment  which  is  as efficient  and economic ^
possible,  (c)  the  sand shall  be  placed with the  right  profile  (which means:
so that we lose as little of it as possible).  Although items (a) and (b) have
long been recognized as appropriate,  that is not the case with item  (c).

     Bruun (1986a) discusses in theory, as  well as in protective equilibria111'
profiles  including geometries  and  grain  sizes.   Theoretical  and  practical
results favor  placement of material, not  on the beach, but along  the entire
cross section, all at  one time, with grains of various sizes placed "exactly
where they belong  in  the profile.   It  is unquestionable  that  this will cause
higher stability and less material loss alongshore as well as offshore.

     Table M  (Bruun 1986a) describes  an example  of  profile  nourishment, W
which  three  different  grain  sizes  (distributions)  are  placed  in  three
different depth  ranges.  This,  of  course,  requires  meticulous  planning
supervision of the actual work in the field under construction.-
                        Table  4.   Profile  Nourishment
Tide
High Spring
Mean
Neap
Mean Spring
Mean
Neap
Low Spring
Mean
Neap
Area
A: + 1, -1
C
C
C
c
-
-
-
-
—
B: -1, -3
C
M
M
M
M
M
M
-
—
C: -3, -5
—
F
F
F .
F
F
F
F
F
                                      120

-------
Three different grain sizes C (0.25mm), M (0.21mm), and F (0.18mm), are dumped
*t three  tidal elevations  (High, Mean,  and Low)  on three  different bottom
areas for the portion of the  beach profile  extending from 1-m above sea level
to 5-m below sea level (A,  B,  and C)  (Bruun  1986a).

     How shall we accomplish  profile  nourishment? — using  equipment  that is
al)le  to dump on  the  beach  as well as  to whatever  depth  the  material shall be
Placed.    This includes  pipelines and  hopper-dredges as  well as  split-hull
b^rges  (Bruun   et  al.   1985)    Figure  6  shows   the  principle  of  "profile
n°urishment;" Figure  7  is  a  Danish  example.   As  explained   in Bruun  (1986a)
Profiie   nourishment   is  highly   economical  compared  to  conventional  beach
JJ°Urishment   due  to   the  lesser  costs  in   offshore dumping bid  prices  in
Queensland .
     For  storm tide protection we  need  dikes of adequate elevation.   At some
       where the beach  has narrowed excessively,  dikes must have  a  hardened
        on  the  ocean  side  to  resist wave attack  and overflows by uprushes.
    to keep the  dike  intact a beach stabilization  is needed in front  of the
    .   if we  are not able  to  stabilize the beach,  we will have to  move the
      back   sooner  or  later  and  keep   moving  it  back  if  shore recession
°°nUnues.   We have no other option.

     In  the  large  scale  we  apparently have  to  consider  three different
p°ssibiiities as  shown in  Figure  8:

     *  Stabilization of  the shoreline:   No further  shoreline recession due to
       the  existing land  developments.

     '  Let  nature  take  its course:   Accept the  erosion;  establish a  beach
       park area instead.

     *  Compromise:  Establish  set-back  lines valid for a certain  time  period
       before reviewing  them for further set-backs.

 .   Stabilization.   This  is a  common  case, where  stabilization  is  a  must.
           in  Holland,  parts of Denmark,  the United Kingdom, and  Germany" will
     to  be closely monitored  in  case  stabilization becomes necessary.   Shore
     opments  like townships  and  barriers protecting  bays or  lagoons do  not
   w further  shoreline recession.  Consequently,  it  is necessary to  nourish
   beach  and to stabilize  the dunes.   This will  be  done for many shores  in
   fornia  and Florida as well as for other shores on  the east coast of  the
United States.

     Let nature  take  its course.   This may be done  where  plenty  of undeveloped
     is  fOLmd behind  the  shoreline,  such  as  in the  Outer Banks  of  North
         in the  United States.   The  most  practical  way  of  handling such a
          is  by  constructing withdrawn dikes at considerable distances behind
  ®   shoreline  and   prohibiting   any   substantial  development  outside   the
 ithdrawn  dike.   This  is already  taking  place  on the Danish North Sea Coast,
  e Dutch Friesan Island, and  on  the Outer Banks.   The wisdom of this  strategy
  °bvious — such national and  state parks have become very  popular and more  of
     are probably going to  be established.


                                     121

-------
PROFILE NOURISHMENT

Schematic Example
       Beach
       0.24 mm = A
                                               Profile: (Depth) 3/2 = PX
                                               p = f(W, H, T, D-)
                                               MSL
Nourishment Material
  A: 0.24 mm
  B: 0.2 mm
  C: 0.18 mm
Dumped on Beach
— Offshore
 - Offshore Until Limiting Depth
  for Movement Based, e.g., on the One-Year Storm
                     Figure 6.  Profile Nourishment
    Figure 7.   Profile Nourishment on the  Danish Morth Sea  Coast
                Source:  Coastal  Directorate,  Lemvig 1985
                                    122

-------
 1.  STAND-BY


 No Recession


     Maintained Dune or Dyke
                                            Shoreline Kept
                                            in Position
                                           Wide Beach
                                                 Narrow
                                                 Beach

                                                 Hardened
                                                 Dune
 2.  GIVE WAY
                             Dunes
3.  NATURE'S COURSE


Recreational Area

Park




Park




Park
A, B, C To Be Evaluated By
Economic and Environmental Parameters
             Figure 8.  Long-Term Shore  Management


Organized Retreat
Time-Limited
Development (50, 1 00 Yrs)
Withdrawn Hykoa ^




Ac




v<


^s
^
idE
I
Withdrawn Dyke
'or Dune




Shoreline Moves
ack ^ck
.^ 	
Defence Lines. At Intervals
Set- Backs




Gradua
**

lly
N^~"




2
2
U
o





\ /

Shoreline Moves
Back Gr

actually \


Z
2
8
                            123

-------
     Compromise.   Establish a set-back  line valid  for  a certain time-period
(e.g., 50 or 100 years).  Allow a controlled development.  Houses can be built
in such a way that they can easily be moved back.
     While items (1) and (2) are straightforward, item (3) is more complicated
because it must be anticipated  that  the lifetimes of parts of the development
are time-limited.   That would  imply,  for example,  that buildings erected on
the property  after some time would  be moved back  to  "safer  locations."  One
may imagine  the administrative difficulties involved  in such an arrangement.
One solution, of  course would be to  lease the coastal properties for limited
periods of  time (e.g., 20, 30,  50,  or 100 years).   The buildings erected on
such property should  then  be designed  in  such  a way that they could be moved
landward to another  location  after a  certain  time  period.   Technically, this
relocation  would  not  be  difficult;   the  problem would  be  to make  new areas
available for the reconstruction of such buildings,  which are expendable after
so many years.

Financing

     Financing  possibilities  vary from country  to country.   In  the  United
States  the   state   governments  are  taking   over   more  and  more  of  the
responsibility which earlier rested  with  the Federal Government.   The Florida
task  force  "Save our  Beaches"  suggests  a 15%  financial contribution  by the
state  and  a 25% local contribution.    In  the  low countries  in  Europe,  costs
will be borne by the national government either  entirely or with some matching
funds  from  the local  governments.    The  contributions  by  public  funds rang6
from 50$ to 100$.  In  some latin countries, like Spain,  the national and state
governments will pay all costs of shoreline protection.

     Developing countries  in  general have no  provisions or possibilities f°f
public  funding.    In  some of  these  countries  (e.g.,  large  coastal  areas  in
Bangladesh) the situation has become  critical.   Financing by- UN-World Bank ^
a possibility being explored for Bangladesh.


CONCLUSION

     *  Sea  level  is  rising.   An accelerated  rise would  cause  accelerating
        erosion of our coastal shorelines.

     •  Our  ability  to  quantify  the  magnitude  of the  rise  is  steadily
        improving.

     •  We  are  (largely)  able to  predict the  influence  of  sea  level rise o11
        shore stability.

     •  Proper  coastal  protective  measures are  available  to  mitigate
        effects of erosion, wherever this  is desirable.

     •  Future  coastal protection will  involve  beach  nourishment  and  s
        tide protection by  dikes  and  revetments, where needed, as well as
        establishment  of practical set-back lines.

     •  Progress  is  being  made,  scientifically  and technically,  to impr°ve
        available nourishment procedures and equipment.


                                      124

-------
REFERENCES

Allison,  H. 1980.   Enigma of  the  Bruun Formula in  shore  erosion.   In  Proc.
     Bruun Symposium,  Newport,  R.I.,  Nov.   1979.  International  Geographical
     Union.

AHison,   H.  1981.   Expedious  regimes  of artificial  beach  nourishment  or
     dredging.   Coastal  Eng.  5:311-330.

Birkemeyer,  Wm.A. 1985.   Field data on  seaward  limit  of profile change.   In
     Proc.  Am.   Soc.   Civil  Engrs..  Journal  Waterway.  Port   and   Coastal
     Engineering Div.   111:598-603.

Barth,  M.C.  and  J.G. Titus.   1984.   Greenhouse  effect and sea  level  rise.   Mew
     York: Van Nostrand  Reinhold.

Bt%uun,  P.  1954a,  Coast Stability.   Danish Engineering Press, 400  pp.

    n,  p.  I954b.  Coast  erosion and development of  beach profile,  Tech.  Memo
     No. 44, CERC, USCE.   (See  also Bruun,  P.  1981.   Port Engineering.  3d  ed.,
     Chap. 7.  Houston:  Gulf Publishing.)

     ,  P.   1962.    Sea  level  rise as a cause of  shore  erosion.    In Proc.  Am.
     Soc.  Civ. Eng.. J.  Waterways Harbors Div.   88:117-130.

Bruun,  p.  1973.   The history and philosophy of coastal protection.   In  Proc.
     13th  Conf.  Coastal  Eng.  33-74.   Vancouver:   Am.  Soc.Civ.  Eng.

     ,  p.  1978.   Tidal  inlets and littoral  drift. Amsterdam:   Elsevier

Bruun,  p.  1980.   The Bruun Rule: discussion on  boundary  conditions.   In  Proc.
     Bruun Symposium,  Newport,  R.I., Nov.  1979.   International  Geographical
     Union.

     ,  p.  1983.   Review  of  conditions for  uses of the Bruun  Rule of  Erosion.
     Coastal Engineering 7:  77-89.

     ,  p.  1985.   Cost effective coastal protection,  Journal  Coastal  Research
     1(1): 47-55.

  Uun,  p.,  and  M.  Schwartz.    1985.  Analytical prediction of beach  profile
     change in   response to  a  sea  level  rise.    Stuttgart,   W.   Germany:
     Zeitschrift for Geomorphologie,  Bd.  36.

  Uun,  p., et al.  1985.   The design and  construction  of mounds for breakwaters
     and  coastal protection.   Amsterdam and New York:  Elsevier.   (Also  see
     review article  by  Bruun  and Losada,  In  Dredging  and Port  Construction,
     Nov.  1985,  25-32.)

     ,  P., 1986a, "Sedimentary Balances - Land and sea with special reference
     to the Icelandic  South Coast  from Porlakshofn to  Dyrholaey.    In  Proc.
     Iceland  Symposium;   Sediment Balances,  Sept.  1985.   Reykjavik,  Iceland:
     The National Energy Authority.
                                     125

-------
Bruun, P.,  1986b,  "Sediments Balances - Land  and  sea,  with special reference
     to  the  Icelandic  South  Coast  from  Porlakshofn  to  Dyrholey",  Coastal
     Engineering, Vol. 10.

Bruun, P.  1986b.   Discussion  of  Paper by C.H. Everts  titled  "Sea Level Rise
     Effects  on  Shoreline Position."   In Proc. A.S.C.E.,  Journal Waterwayjj.
     Ports and Coastal Engineering Division 112 (3).

Dansgaard,  W.  1985.      Fast  environmental  changes  in   the  North-Atlantic
     Region.  In Proc. POAC-85. Greenland.   Horsholm, the Netherlands: Danish
     Hydraulic Institute.
Dansgaard, W.,  and J.C.  Duplessy.   1981.    The  Eemian  interglacial  and
     termination.  In The Climate of Europe:  Past, present and future, ed.  .
     Flohn  and  R.   Fantechi,   Dordrecht/Boston/Lancaster:   D.  Reidel.  Chap-
     5.3,  208-225.

Dansgaard, W.  1984.   The  future  degree of  glaciation    In The  Climate_J>£
     Europe Chap. 5.4, 225-248.

Deigaard, R., J. Fredsoe, and F.B. Hedegaard.  1985.  A mathematical model f°r
     littoral drift,  Report No. 301.   Danish Center  for Applied Mathematics
     and Mechanics.

Dubois, R.N.  1976.   Nearshore evidence  in  support in  the Bruun  Rule on shore
     erosion. J. Geol. 83:485-491.

Dubois,  R.N.    1982.  Relation  among  wave  conditions,  sediment  texture,  and
     rising sea level: An opinion. Shore and Beach 50(2).

Everts, C. H.  1985.   Sea level rise  effects  on  shoreline position.   In Pfoc^.
     Am.  Soc.  Civil  Engrs.. Journal Waterways,  Ports  and Coastal Engineering
     Division. 111:995-1000.

Emery,  K.O.  1980.   Relative sea  levels from tide-gauge records.    In
     National Academy of Sciences  97:6968-6972.

Fairbridge,  R.    1961.   Eustatic changes  in  sea level.    In  Physics
     chemistry of the earth (Pergamon Press).  4:99.

Fenneman,  M.M.    1982.   Development  of the  profile  of equilibrium  of
     subaquateous Shore Terrace. J. of Geol, X.

Fisher,  J.J.     1980.    Shoreline  erosion,  Rhode  Island and North Caroli°a
     coasts:   Tests of  the  Bruun  Rule.   In  Proc.   Bruun Symposium, Newport*
     R.I., Nov.  1979. International Geographical Union.

Guilcher,  A.   1958.   Coastal and  submarine morphology.  New York:  John
     and Sons.

Hands,  E.B.,  1980.    Bruun 's concept  applied to  the  Great Lakes.    In
     Bruun  Sympps ium , Newport,  R.I., Nov.   1979.  International  Geographic^-1-
     Union.
                                      126

-------
Hallermeier, R.J.  1972.  Calculating a yearly limit depth to the active beach
     profile, TP 77-9.  Ft. Belvoir, Va.: CERC, USCE.

Hallermeier, R.J.    198la.    Seaward  limit of significant sand  transport by
     waves,  CETA 81-2, Ft. Belvoir, Va.: CERC, USCE.

Hallermeier,  R.J.    198lb.    Critical   wave  conditions  for  sand  motion
     initiative. CETA 81-10, Ft. Belvoir, Va.:CERC, USCE.

Hicks,  S.D.    1980.    An  average geopotential  sea level  series  for  the United
     States.  J. Geophys. Res. 83 (C3).

Hicks,  S.D.   1985.  Shore and Beach (January).

Kuhn,  G.,   and  F.  Sheppard.    1983.    Importance  of  phreatic Vulcanism  in
     producing  abnormal  weather conditions.  Shore and Beach (Oct.  1983).

Weatherman,   S.P.  1982.    Barrier  island  evolution  in  response to sea  level
     rise:  a discussion.  Journal Sedimentary Petrology 53. (3):1026-1033.

^isle,  L.D.,  1982.    Annotated bibliography  of sea  level changes along  the
     Atlantic and Gulf coasts of North America.  Shore and Beach.  50(3).

Losada, M.,  and H. Desire.   1985.   Incipient  motion of horizontal sand bottom
     under non-breaking Waves,  Report by Dept.  Puertos  Y Structuras Maritime,
     Universidad de Santander,  Spain.   (See also Losada  and  Desire:   Coastal
     Engineering 9:357-370).

Marmar, H.A.,  1948.   Is  the  Atlantic coast sinking?   The evidence  from  the
     tides.   Geological  Review 38:352.

MiUimain,  J.D.,  and  K.O.  Eery.    1968.   Sea  levels  during the past 35,000
     years.   Science 162 (3558) :1121-1123.

Nummedal,  D.  1983.   Future sea level  changes  along the Louisiana  coast,  Shore
     and  Beach   (April 1983).

     ,  P.S.   1978.   A regional test  of the Bruun Rule  on  shoreline  erosion.
     Mar.  Geol.   26:M7-M16.

R°sen,  P.S.   1980.   An application  of the  Bruun Rule in  the  Cheasapeake Bay.
     In Proc.   Bruun  Symposium,  Newport,   R.I.,   Nov.   1979.    International
     Geographical Union.

Schwartz,  M. L.   1967.  The Bruun  theory on sea level rise as a  cause  of  shore
     erosion.  J.  Geol.   75:79-92.

Schwartz,  M.L.,  1968.  The scale of shore erosion.  J. Geol.  76:508-517.

Schwartz,  M.L.    1980.   The Bruun  Rule:   A  historic  perspective.    In  Proc.
     Bruun  Symposium, Newport,  R.I.,  Nov.  1979.    International  Geographical
     Union.
                                     127

-------
Siefert,  W.    1984.    Changes in  tide levels  in the  German  Bay.   In
     Coastal  Engineering  Conf.,   Houston,  TX.    New  York:   Am.  Soc.  Civil
     Engineers.

Stommel, H.  1960.  The Gulf Stream.  Los Angeles: Univ. of Calif. Press.

Trask,  P.   1955.  Movement of sand  around  southern California promontories,
     Tech. Maemo No. 76,  Beach Erosion Board, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

Titus,  J.G.,   S.P.  Leatherman,  C.H.  Everts,  D.L.  Krisbel,   and R.G.  Dean.
     1985.   Potential  impacts of  sea level  rise on the beach at Ocean City,
     Maryland,   EPA.   230-1085-013.  Washington,  D.C.:   U.S.  Environmental
     Protection Agency.

U.S. Dept.  of Commerce.   1983.   Sea level variations  for  the United States,
     Rockville, MD: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).

van de  Graaf,  J. 1986.   Probabilistic  design of dunes:  An  example  from the
     Netherlands.  Coastal Engineering 9:479-500.

Van Veen,  J.J.   1962.   Dredge, drain and reclaim;   The art of a nation.  Den
     Hadd, Holland: Martinus Nijhoff.

Vellinga, P.  1983.  Predictive computational model for beach and dune erosion
     during  storm  surge.    In  Proc.  Coastal  Structures  83:  806-820.  New
     York:Am.Soc. Civil Engrs.

Vellinga,  P.  and  P.  Bruun.   1984.   Discussion on  "Beach and  dune erosion
     during  storm surges"  by  P.   Vellinga  (Coastal Engineering  6:361-387)-
     Coastal Engineering 8:171-88.

Vellinga, P., et al. 1985.   Dune  erosion,  Delft Hydraulic  Laboratory Report M
     1263, Deel V (Dutch text).

Weggel,  R.    1979.   A  method for  estimating  long-term erosion rates  from &
     long-term rise in water level, CETA 79-2, Ft. Belvoir,  Va.: CERC, USCE,
                                      128

-------
Predicting the Effects of Sea Level Rise
on Coastal Wetlands

Richard A. Park, Thomas V. Armentano, and
C. Leslie Cloonan
Holcomb Research Institute
Butler University
Indianapolis, Indiana USA
INTRODUCTION

     Accelerated sea  level  rise  brought about by global warming may  have  a
Profound  effect  on  coastal  wetland  distribution  (Titus,  this  volume).   Wet-
lands,  including salt-, brackish-,  and  freshwater marshes and, in subtropical
*nd tropical  regions, mangrove swamps,  typically  occupy low-energy,  protected
coastlines  in estuaries,  bays,  and lagoons.    Consequently,  in the  United
States  only  10$  to  20%  of  the  Pacific  coast  is  suitable  for  wetland
development because of the high-energy,  rocky  shoreline, whereas about 70%  of
the shoreline of the  Atlantic  and Gulf coasts  is  suitable because  of  the
extensive  estuaries  and gently  sloping  coasts with lagoons ' behind  barrier
islands (Emery and Uchupi  1972).

     Wetlands are important  to  the  ecology  and economy of  coastal  areas  for
several reasons.  Their biological productivity is equal to or exceeds that  of
any other  natural or  agricultural system.  For example, a Georgia salt marsh
has,  on average, an annual yield of 8 tons/acre (1700 g/m2) of organic matter
(Teal 1962)  and a  Florida  mangrove  swamp,  4  tons/acre  (880 g/m2)  (Mann
!972).  In comparison, the best wheat field yields 7  tons/acre (1570 g/m2)  and
offshore  coastal waters yield 1  to  U  tons/acre (220 to 3^0 g/m2)  of organic
     About  half of  marsh productivity  is  available  to  marsh animals  and
°oastal  fisheries  (Teal  and  Teal  1969).   Furthermore,  salt marshes  serve as
fiursery  grounds  for  over  half  the species of commercially significant  fishes
*n the southeastern United States  (Thurman  1983), as rookeries for- many water
f°wl,  and as refuges for a variety of mammals (Teal and Teal  1969).

     Wetlands  also remove pollutants,  including  nitrogen,  phosphorus,  heavy
Petals,  and radioisotopes, from sewage  effluent and ground- and surface water
(Pope and Gosselink  1973).    Equally  important,  they  store  floodwater  and
Provide  protection  from  coastal  storms and  high tides  (Lugo and  Brinson


                                    129

-------
1978).   Based  on these functions,  it  has  been estimated that marshes provide
an annual return equivalent to $5,500/acre (Thurman 1983) and mangrove swamps,
a return of $990/acre (Lugo and Brinson 1978).

     These valuable systems could  be diminished  and lost with accelerated sea
level rise,  whereas  slow sea  level rise favors  development  and expansion of
wetlands.  In  fact,  during the past 4,000 years  when the sea level has risen
an average of  1  mm/yr,  0.04  in/yr (Emery and Uchupi  1972), wetlands have kept
pace, and  in  many  areas, actually increased significantly  due  to sediment
entrapment and  peat  formation (Davis  1985).   However,  vertical accretion of
wetlands has not been observed to  occur at  a rate comparable to the acceler-
ated  sea  level  rise  projected   for  the  next   century  by  Hoffman  (1984).
Therefore, future inundation and erosion of wetlands has been projected (Earth
and Titus 1984).

     Based on  available data, wetlands  along undeveloped coastlines lacking
protective  engineering  structures  are  expected  to  migrate  readily  onto
adjacent lowlands, especially  in  areas less  than  3.5 m (10 ft) in elevation.
However, because most  coastal lowlands  have steeper  slopes  than present-day
wetlands, the  areas  of wetlands  lost  may exceed areas  gained,  causing  a net
reduction in wetlands.   Furthermore, many coastlines,  especially those which
are or will be developed commercially,  probably will be protected by dikes and
levees.   These  structures will preclude  migration of the wetlands, and large-
scale loss of wetlands has been projected (Titus, in press).

     In order to assess the potential loss and migration of wetlands, detailed
case studies were  conducted  in South Carolina and  in New Jersey (Kana,  Baca,
and  Williams  1986;  Kana  et  al.,  in  press),  and  a  more  general map  and
simulation analysis  was conducted  on  fifty-seven sites  along  the contiguous
coasts  of  the   United  States  (Park, Armentano,  and  Cloonan  1986;  Armentano,
Park, and Cloonan,  in press).   This paper  reviews these studies and suggests
possible effects on marshes and mangrove swamps representative of a variety of
coastal situations under  a  scenario of high  sea  level rise and protection of
developed areas.

DETAILED CASE STUDIES

Charleston, South Carolina, Area

     Twelve  wetland  transects  provided  the database  for  considering  the
effects of sea level  rise on the  harbor  of  Charleston, South Carolina (Kana,
Baca, and  Williams  1986).   Figure  1  shows  a  composite  of  these transects.
Shoreline  changes  were  assumed   to   depend on  slope,   with  gentle  slopes
experiencing considerable horizontal shoreline displacement and steep slopes,
relatively little.    Artificial  or engineered  shorelines were  recognized as
impediments  to  shifts in shoreline position until a  threshold sea level was
exceeded.  Detailed  maps were prepared based on  topographic  quadrangles that
were digitized  and  displayed  in  computer-generated form.   A  good database on
historical shoreline  trends was available  to help project future responses to
sea level rise.
                                      130

-------
                                                           COMPOSITE TRANSECT-
                                                             CHARLESTON. S.C.
                     Hir.Hl.AND 47%
u>
                                                                                                              SPBIHO HIGH WATER
                                                                                                              MEAN MICH WATER
                                                                                                              NEAP HtOH WATER
                 -e
                                                            7OOO            3OOO
                                                         TYPICAL DISTANCE.(FT)
                                                                                           4OOO
sooo
                         Figure 1.  Composite Transect of Charleston,  South Carolina, Marsh
                                     Source:  Kana,  Baca, and  Williams  1986

-------
     A previous study showed that over the past 40 years the Charleston shore-
line  has  accreted  relative  to  sea  level,  which  is  similar  to  shoreline
responses throughout most of the  Atlantic  coast.   For purposes of the present
study, a vertical marsh  accretion  rate of 5 mm/yr  was employed.   Landward
migration of  tidal  flats,  low  marsh, high  marsh,  and  transitional wetland-
upland vegetation,  was considered  as a response to  sea level  rise.   Dikes,
bulkheads, and other protective structures,  however,  would  act as barriers to
marsh migration  onto uplands.   Under such  a scenario,  wetland distribution
through  2075  will depend on the  potential for wetlands  to maintain vertical
sediment  elevation relative to  specified  sea  level  rise  rates, assuming a
constant  sedimentation rate  throughout all  marsh environments,  and  on  the
capacity  for  horizontal migration  as rising  seas encroach  on  the critical
elevational range for each marsh type.

     Results of the  scenario analyses indicate that  by the  year 2075 signifi-
cant marsh  loss  would  occur under  all  scenarios (Figure  2).   Even  without
additional protective  structures,  70$ of high marsh and  40$-84# of low marsh
would be  lost under  moderate and  high scenarios.   Total wetland loss (exclud-
ing  tidal flats  but  including  transition  marsh)  would  range  from  43^-73^
without  additional  protection,  under  moderate  and  high  scenarios.    Under
specified construction of protective devices for   certain  sites, losses would
rise to 5*\%-92% of 1980 marsh area.  Nearly all of Sullivans Island,  a seaward
barrier  island,  would  experience significant erosion  and shoreline  movement.
In the high  scenarios  (a rise of  1.6 m,  or 5.2  ft, by  2025),  few additional
changes  would  occur except for  shifts  up to 225  m  (740  ft)  inland  of  the
shoreline parts of the mainland.   Despite the extensive  losses projected  for
the  Charleston  area,  the  relatively wide  tidal  range  (1.6  m,  or 5.2  ft)
suggests less wetland vulnerability to rising seas.

Tuckerton, New Jersey,  Area

     This site,  consisting  of two marsh areas with a 0.6-1.0  m (2.0-3.3
tidal  range,  was  evaluated as  representative of  a microtidal back-barrier
wetland  area  that  is  more  typical  of  the  Atlantic coast  (Kana et al.,  in
press).   Six subenvironments  were  distinguished at  Tuckerton,  ranging  from
open sea to highland (Figure 3).  Field surveys determined exact boundaries of
subenvironments.

     The Kana et al. model projects the replacement  of high marsh by low marsh
under  the low scenario  (Figure 4).   However, the  aggregate change in  salt
marsh area is small; if transition marsh is included,  wetland changes counter-
balance,  with essentially no net change.

     With a high  scenario sea level  rise,  significant  land  and wetland  losses
result (Figure  5).   Salt  marsh  is  reduced  by  &5%-90%,  favoring  open  sea.
Transition marsh  would  be  significantly  reduced at  Tuckerton.    The  South
Carolina and New Jersey sites differ  in projected response to the moderate  sea
level rise  scenario as a result  of  the  predominance  of low marsh at one and
high marsh at the  other.  The low marsh is lost  to tidal flats or open  water,
whereas  the  extensive high marsh  in New Jersey  would  be  converted  to  low
marsh.
                                      132

-------
                                                                            WATER
                                                                             2075
                                                                             33*
•6-
IIJ
o
in
 O-

-2-
                    TBAMSITIOM HIGH MARSH
                       198O  I    198O
                       3%   I     5%
ZO75 MSL
LOW SCENARIO

19BO MSL
EMSTWG
       HIGHLAND •
       :  1980  *:
         47%  ,
     Figure 2.  Conceptual Model  of Low-Scenario Sea Level Rise  in  Charleston  Marsh
                 Source:  Kana, Baca, and Williams 1986

-------
                                                             Tidal Flat
                                                                1%
          Waler
           33%
                                                                                     MainHighWater
                                                                              	Loc»l MSL
                                                                                     M«»o Low Wjt»c
                              20QQ        30OO

                             TYPICAL DISTANCE (FT)
5000
                                                                              6000
Figure  3.   Composite Transect of Tuckerton,  New Jersey,  Marsh
            Source   Kana et al.,  in press

-------
    *8

£f  +6
LU
   -2-

   -4
       Highland
         2075
         28%
                     Transition
                       2075
                       3%
           High Marsh
              2075
               5%
Low Marsh
   2075
   29%
          Highland
           1980
           30%
Transition
  1980
   7%
Migh Marsh
   1980
   27%
Low Marsh
   1980
   2%
                Tidal Flat   Water
                  2075
                   1%
           2075
           34%
                                                         2075 («5.0 fl.)
                                                         2075 (»3.3 ft.)

                                                         2075 (* 2.5 ft.)
                                                          • 2075(» 1.0 ft.)
                                                          »075 MSL	
                                                                                            ?-2075 MSL
                                                                                                Low Scenario

                                                                                            ¥-1980 MSL
 Tidal Flal  Water
--1980    1980
   1%    33%
      Figure 4.  Conceptual Model of Low-Scenario Sea Level Rise in Tuckerton Marsh
                 Source:   Kana et al., in press

-------





z
0
£
>
UJ
111









Highla
207J
1%
*10 -

*6 -
*4 -
«?

0 -
-2 -

-4 -I
nd
5
:'•••:•.
High Marsh
2075
Transition 2%
2075 /Low Marsh
2%/ / 2075
T^JL L ' ' L^Tidalflat Water 2075 (* 5 Oft)
^^^J" , ~\ 2075 2075 , , , '(
KXXXX>L 1 _l „ . ... ,._._. 	 .,.,..._ 	 2075 (« 3 3 It .)
?*<Kr-\ 	 2075 (* 2.5 ft.)
:::':&^*/:^&£x:5fc><(£s5r*£-- — ^ 	 2075 ( » 1.0) \-7 _„_

;-V»«"
:•::•'
'•;.;::"
:/:::
•'•'•"I
'•'•!?'



:i980« 3 3^

* * ^


>
„
Highland
1980
30%
^-^Z^/////Sediin«ntation SrnnVyr'V/y VSS/S S / / / 7^ i linh '
-

- '"
1
•
- -
Transition
1980
7%




f T V o U M olr~~
-


High Marsh Low Marsh
1980 1980 	
27% 2%
y> . ••!)•• -
s/»-
\






+*.


\_s?~~>>*- ^ ion
^-tfc^V/^-^.^^ _ 1 JO
- ^^^^^22777^7
"• ' * t'L^-
•Siw»?>
Tidal Flat Water
-^-- 1980 1980
| 1% 33%
Figure 5.  Conceptual Model of High-Scenario Sea Level Rise in Tuckerton Marsh
           Source:  Kana et al., in press

-------
REGIONAL MODELING

     To develop a regional-national analysis of U.S. coastal wetland responses
to  sea level  rise,  a general  simulation  model  was  developed,  and  model-
supportive stratified sampling of the contiguous U.S. coastline was undertaken
for nine regions (Armentano, Park, and Cloonan in press).

Data

     A  total  of  183  7.5-minute  USGS  topographic  quadrangles  were used  to
characterize  the  fifty-seven  sites  depicted in  Figure  6.    The data  were
collected using the Universal Transverse Mercator  grid so that  each  cell is
1 km^  (100  hectares,  or  247 acres).   Of the  sixteen categories  of  coastal
types,  each  is based  on the  dominant category  within the  square-kilometer
cell.   They  are summarized  in  Table 1.  The mean elevation  is  based  on the
dominant  category   in  the  cell.     Although  this  introduces  an  element  of
imprecision,   if a   large  enough  area is  considered,  the  estimate  is  not
biased.  Tidal  range for  both open sea and sheltered  areas is taken from the
topographic maps,  or, if necessary, from tide tables.

     The presence of naturally  sheltered  areas (e.g., bays)  is coded,  as are
"fcjor  protective  structures  such  as  levees.   Finally,  the  existence  of
significant residential and  commercial development  is  noted.  The extent of
freshwater and  brackish  wetlands  cannot be  determined at  the  regional  level
from topographic maps.

      Models
     A large number of  models  have been constructed  for  fresh- and saltwater
Wetlands (cf.  Day  et al.  1973;  Wiegert et  al.  1975;  Costanza et  al.  1983;
^itsch et al.  1982;  Costanza and  Sklar  1985).   However, few  of these models
incorporate  the spatial resolution desired in the present study.  Two notable
exceptions are recent papers by Browder, Hartley, and Davis (1985) and Sklar,
costanza,  and  Day   (1985)  on  disintegration  and  habitat  changes  in  the
Louisiana  coastal wetlands.    No   previous models provided  both  the  spatial
Resolution  and the generality  required  for studying  the  effects of sea level
     on a regional scale for  the United  States.
  e^ SLAMM Model

5escrip_tion.    SLAMM  (Sea  Level Affecting Marshes  Model) simulates  the long-
term change  in coastal areas due  to rising  sea  level.   The  smallest  area
simulated is  a 7.5-minute  quadrangle (1:24,000);  the  largest practical area is
*bout the size of four 7.5-minute quadrangles.   The  assumptions and methodol-
°gy are appropriate  for application  to entire coastlines.

     SLAMM is  intended  to be used  primarily as  a diagnostic  tool,  providing
scientists,  resource planners, and decision makers with  a basis for consider-
ing- the impacts of  future sea level rise on  coastal  systems,  especially  wet-
lands and barrier islands.  As such,  the model employs  a reasonably straight-
forward but  complex  set of decision  rules  to predict  the transfer of map cells
from one category to another (Figure 7).   These rules embody assumptions of
                                     137

-------
               1 New England
               2 Mid-Atlantic
               3 South Atlantic
               4 Southern Florida
                5 East Gulf Coast
                6 Mississippi Delta
                7 Chenier Plain-Texas Barrier Islands

                8 Californian
                9 Columbian
8
   Figure 6.   Location of  Sample  Sites  and Coastal  Regions Used in
                Modeling Wetlands
                Source:   Armentano  et al.,  in  press
                                       138

-------
                Table 1.   Coastal Land Categories
Category

Undeveloped Upland


Developed Upland


Undeveloped Lowland



Developed Lowland


Protected Lowland


High Dunes

Exposed Beach

Sheltered Beach

Developed Exposed Beach


Developed Sheltered Beach


Freshwater Marsh


Salt Marsh


Mangrove Swamp

Tidal Flat

Sheltered Water


Open Water
 Definition
Undeveloped upland  land  that  is  above
3.5 m  elevation

Upland that has significant line deleted
development

Land that  is below  3.5 m elevation and
above  mean high water spring  tide (MHW
Spring)

Lowland that has significant  residential
or commercial development

Lowland that is protected from
inundation by a dike or  levee

Extensive, large sand dunes

Beach  exposed to the open ocean

Beach  sheltered from the open ocean

Exposed beach with  significant resi-
dential or commercial development

Sheltered beach with significant
residential  or commercial development

Wetland composed of species intolerant
of salt water

Wetland composed of herbaceous species
that are tolerant of salt water

Wetland composed of mangrove trees

Muddy or rocky intertidal zone

Water that is protected from the open
ocean

Water that is not protected from  the
open ocean
                              139

-------
                                        TIDAL FLAT
                                        (& ROCKY
                                        INTERTIDAL)
                  UNDEVELOPED

                   LOWLAND
Figure 7.  SLAMM Flow Chart Showing Transfers  Among Categories
           Source:  Park et al.f  1986.
                                140

-------
linear,  average responses and may not apply in detail for any particular area;
however,  they  are  suitable  for  policy  development  on  a  regional  basis,
Providing an  estimate of  the magnitude  of the  problems  and  suggesting  the
nature of the  regional  policies needed  to mitigate  those problems.   Because
the model is  intended to be  applied to many different  areas,  the algorithms
have been developed  to require minimal input from the user.

     Each cell category  is  represented  by a pattern  and a color,  so  that  the
Primary   output  from  the model  is  colored maps  for  user-specified  yearly
intervals for  a given  area and rate of sea level rise.  Summary statistics  for
all categories  are provided  for 25-year  intervals and for wetlands, for 5-year
intervals,  so  that the progressive impact on coastal wetlands  can be assess-
ed.  The model  is  implemented in  Turbo Pascal for the IBM PC.

^gsumptions  and Simplifications.  Because the model  is intended to be  used  for
Regional analysis of  long-term trends,  several simplifying assumptions have
been made that may not  be  appropriate for detailed analysis  of local  and
short-term conditions:

     •   Each square-kilometer cell  is represented by only one  (dominant) cate-
        gory and by  average  elevation; this  results  in  underrepresentation of
        pocket  beaches,  marshes,  and  narrow   barrier  beaches;  furthermore,
        gradual  changes  seem  to  occur  instantaneously when  the  threshold
        average elevation of the  cell is reached.

     •   Continued  residential and  commercial development of coastal  zones is
        ignored; only  those  areas  developed  when the maps  were  published  are
        subject  to protection;  given  current  trends  and  policies,  this may  not
        be a reasonable assumption.

     •   Freshwater discharge is ignored in distinguishing freshwater  wetlands
        from saltwater  wetlands;  this  is  most noticeable  in  the   Florida
        Everglades, which are modeled as mangrove swamp  due to  their elevation
        near sea level.

     •   Sedimentation  and accretion rates are related to the extent of  exist-
        ing  wetlands;  in  most areas  this  results in a decrease  in  sedimenta-
        tion as marshes disappear,  coinciding with the decrease brought about
        by sediments  "hanging up"  further  inland in the deepening  estuaries;
        however, in areas where extensive lowlands are inundated  and converted
        into wetlands, this  algorithm will predict   increased  sedimentation—
        perhaps more than is  reasonable.

     •   No distinction is made among East Coast, West  Coast,  and Gulf Coast
        marshes;  the  same  algorithms  are used for  accretion,  erosion,   and
        position within the  tidal range for all  three regions; SLAMM also does
        not  distinguish between mature and new marshes.

     •   No provision   is  made for  changing  vegetation due to  global warming
        trends;  in particular,  mangroves will not be simulated in more  north-
        erly areas where  they do not  already  occur.

     *   Cliff retreat  is  not modeled, nor is the increased  supply of  sediment
        to the  coastal regime  due  to cliff  erosion;  this  could affect areas
        such as Cape Cod,  Massachusetts, and  Oxnard,   California.

                                     141

-------
     •  Actual bathymetry  is not  considered  nor  is  the  effect  of changing
        bathymetry on  wave  energy; beach migration  is permitted in sheltered
        water but not  in  open sea; this  seems to  be a reasonable simplifica-
        tion for essentially all areas.

     •  The change in erosion by tidal currents with changing morphometry and
        bathymetry is not modeled.

     •  Changes  in  storm  tracks  and  in the  erosive  energy of  storms con-
        comitant with climatic change are not modeled.

Validation.  SLAMM has been  partially  validated by comparison of results with
those of  the  detailed study  of  the Tuckerton, New  Jersey,  area conducted by
Kana  et  al.  (1985).   However,  it must  be recognized that  true  validation
cannot be  obtained  because of the radically different approaches  and scales
being compared.  In the detailed study the predicted major response at the New
Jersey wetland site to a low-scenario  sea level rise, as of the year 2075, is
the  replacement  of  high salt  marsh  with  low  salt marsh  (Kana  et  al.,  i°
press).    Also  projected  is the loss of over half  the transition marsh in the
Tuckerton  area,  but an  increase  of transition  marsh in the  Great  Bay area.
However,   at both locations  no change in overall  wetland area  is  projected
under the  low  scenario.   The conversion  of high salt marsh to low salt marsh
would not  be  detected in  our model; furthermore,  because  the  distinction
between salt marsh  and freshwater  marsh  cannot  be made in the input data but
is based  on imprecise elevation determinations,  we prefer  to consider total
wetland changes.   Adjustments to transitional marsh in the Kana et al. studies
would occur within  the  framework  of  our general  freshwater  marsh  category-
The SLAMM  model  projects  a 9% decline  in total wetland area by 2075, growing
rapidly to  a  75% decline by the year  2100.  For the common year of 2075, the
New Jersey  study projects no  net change in  the total marsh area, whereas ours
projects  a 9%  decline.    However, as late as 2045,  SLAMM projects  a 1.°*
decline in  wetland  area,  a figure not  significantly  different from one of no
change,  given  the limits  of both studies.   Our simulation  through the year
2100, however, suggests that  the trend toward  migration onto adjacent lowland
would soon come to an end and that many of the gains would be lost.

     Agreement  is more  pronounced  under the high  scenario.   Kana  et • al-
project an 84$ decline in salt marshes of the Tuckerton area by 2075, compared
with  a   loss   of 75%  by  2075  and a loss  of 99$  by  2080  in  our  study.
Consequently,  our  conclusion with  respect  to  salt  marshes  in  the  Tuckerton
area  is  that  the two  methods,  despite being  dissimilar in  many respects and
covering  different  areas,   represent   reasonably  well an  unstable  coastal
situation  which  leads to  either  salt  marsh gains  or  salt marsh  losses»
depending on rates of sea level rise.

Results

     A major  finding  of  the modeling  study  is  that  regional  patterns  of
wetland distribution and  the potential for loss or  gain  of wetlands with sea
level rise  during  the  next century depend on  two  principal factors:  (1) the
tidal range within  which  saltwater wetlands can occur;  and (2) the extent of
the lowest  Pleistocene terrace  (often found at  approximately  1.5  m, or 5 ft»
in elevation above present sea level along tectonically stable coasts).
                                      142

-------
     Thus in  New  England, where  there is  virtually no low  terrace,  marshes
occur in association with pocket beaches  in  small  coves and behind small sand
spits.    Although  the  tidal  range  is  high  and   thus  favors maintenance  of
marshes,  there  is  little lowland  to be  inundated and colonized  by  marshes.
Consequently,  after 2075, when sea level  rise  exceeds  the  present spring high
tide level,  present salt  marshes  will be lost with no compensating gain in new
     area  (Figure  8).
     In contrast,  from  Long  Island  to southern  Florida,  coastal  slopes  are
gentle,  barrier beaches are common, and the  low  terrace  is widespread.  Tidal
ranges are also moderately high.  Therefore, wetlands  are  an important compe-
tent of the coastal system.   With the  high  scenario,  most  marsh areas will be
inundated,  such as  those  behind the Atlantic  City barrier  beach  (Figure  9).
However in a  few areas,  unless development of  resort  communities precludes
inundation of  the low  terrace, some  marshes  will  expand throughout much of the
twenty-first  century,  decreasing  only  after the protective beach  ridges  are
breached (Figure 10).

     The Florida Keys  and  Everglades owe  their  existence  to carbonate deposits
     accumulated  in  shallow  water  during  higher stands of sea level  in  the
Pleistocene.    As  the  Keys  are inundated (in  the  absence  of  protective mea-
sures),  a  slight  increase  in  mangrove swamps can  be anticipated;  but after
2075 the  region will rapidly become open  water (Figure  11).   The southern
Everglades will  also  disappear,  but  wetlands  may  actually   increase where
       areas are inundated.
     The  Gulf Coast  is also  a  region of  low  slopes and  barrier  coastlines;
but,  unlike the  Atlantic,  it has higher terraces  along  the coast and very low
tidal ranges.   Therefore,  the marshes are more vulnerable to  inundation and
cannot  migrate inland as readily as  the  marshes of  the  Atlantic Coast.   With
few exceptions,   the  Gulf  Coast  marshes  will  gradually  disappear until  the
barrier islands   are  breached, at  which  time  those  marshes not  protected  by
dikes will decline  precipitously  (Figure  12).    A  notable exception  to  this
Pattern is in the region of the  Mississippi delta,  where  rapid subsidence  is
Already overwhelming  high   sedimentation  and  accretion rates.    In  general,
large-scale loss  of marshes  (far exceeding the current  rate)  can  be expected
ln this region early  in the next  century  (Figure 13).

     Most  of  the West  Coast is similar to New England:   steep,  rocky slopes
Predominate.   Wetlands are  of minor  extent but occupy a wide  tidal  range,  so
fchat  they  can  be  expected to persist  throughout most  of  the next century.   The
"tore  extensive marshes in  the tectonic  lowlands of  San -Francisco  Bay and the
Washington coast  will  probably expand onto adjacent  lowlands unless restricted
by protective  structures  (Figure  14).

     Aggregating  the  individual case  studies provides, with one reservation, a
c°nvenient way to detect commonalities  in wetland response  trends throughout
the diverse U.S.  regions.   Although  the  study sites were  chosen to  achieve a
Representative sample of wetland  types  without a priori bias  as  to  expected
responses,  the case   study sites were not randomly  chosen  nor  was adequacy  of
sampie  size ensured.    Therefore, the apparent patterns  in  any  area  cannot  be
interpreted as statistically  valid estimates of region-wide responses to sea
level rise.   Instead,  the aggregated  data  are best viewed as indicative of the
class of  responses  likely to occur in coastal  areas  similar to the case study


                                      143

-------
                                      21
                           LEGEND
Undev. Upland
UndevLowland
Prot. Lowland
Exp. Beach
DevExp. Beach
Fresh Marsh
Mangrove
Shelt. Water
Dike or levee
                            o
                            u
Dev. Upland
Dev. Lowland
High Dunes
Shelt. Beach
Dev. Shelt. B.
Salt Marsh
Tidal Flat
Open Sea
Blank
a
ft
•

Vt
!
--

I!
Figure  8.   Small  Marsh Is  Lost at Jonesport,  Maine, with
            High-Scenario Sea Level  Rise.
                              144

-------
                            LEGEND
Undev. Upland R
UndevLowland Ml
Prot. Lowland o
Exp. Beach '/
DevExp. Beach <>
Fresh Marsh III!
Mangrove u
Shelt. Water
Dike or levee 1
Dev. Upland
Dev. Lowland
High Dunes
Shelt. Beach
Dev. Shelt. B.
Salt Marsh
Tidal Flat
Open Sea
Blank
£
0
•
%
ft
LJ
=

S
Figure 9.  Extensive Back-Barrier  Marsh  Is  Lost  at  Atlantic  City,
           New Jersey,  with High-Scenario Sea Level Rise
                                145

-------
                                 LEGEND
Undev. Upland
UndevLowland
Prot. Lowland
Exp. Beach
DevExp. Beach
Fresh Marsh
Mangrove
Shelt. Water
Dike or levee
                                  LI
Dev. Upland
Dev. Lowland
High Dunes
Shelt. Beach
Dev. Shelt. B.
Salt Marsh
Tidal Flat
Open Sea
Blank
                                                         ii
                                                         o
                                                         V.
                                                         U
Figure  10.  Marsh Persists by Migrating  onto Adjacent Lowlands  at
             Sapelo Island, Georgia, with High-Scenario Sea Level  Rise
                                   146

-------
                                  21W
                                                                  fM>
                           LEGEND
Undev. Upland
UndevLowland
Prot. Lowland
Exp. Beach
DevExp. Beach
Fresh Marsh
Mangrove
Shalt. Water
Dike or levee
•
ft
0
',
fr
Illl
li

1
Dev. Upland
Dev. Lowland
High Dunes
Shalt. Beach
Dev. Shelt. B.
Salt Marsh
Tidal Flat
Open Sea
Blank
it
u-
•
%
%
11
=

n
Figure 11.   Everglades and Most of the Florida Keys Are Lost
            with High-Scenario Sea Level Rise
                              147

-------
                                           21
                                    LEGEND
Undev. Upland
UndevLowland
Prot. Lowland
Exp. Beach
DevExp. Beach
Fresh Marsh
Mangrove
Shelt. Water
Dike or levee
                                     R
                                     u
Dev. Upland
Dev. Lowland
High Dunes
Shelt. Beach
Dev. Shelt. B.
Salt Marsh
Tidal Flat
Open Sea
Blank
                                                           I!
                                                           a
Figure  12.   Marsh  and Rice  Fields Not Protected by Dikes  West of  Sabine
             Pass,  Texas, Are Lost with High-Scenario Sea  Level Rise
             (saltwater intrusion is  not modeled)
                                      148

-------
                                    2190
                                                        n
                            LEGEND
Undev. Upland
UndevLowland
Prot. Lowland
Exp. Beach
DevExp. Beach
Fresh Marsh
Mangrove
Shelt. Water
Dike or levee
                             ! 1
Dev. Upland
Dev. Lowland
High Dunes
Shelt. Beach
Dev. Shelt. B.
Salt Marsh
Tidal Flat
Open Sea
Blank
                                                    V«
                                                    I!
                                                    B
Figure 13.   All the  Lower  Atchafalaya Delta in Louisiana  Is
              Inundated with High-Scenario Sea Level  Rise
                                 149

-------
1975
                            21W
                                        LEGEND
                        Undev. Upland
                        UndevLowland
                        Prot. Lowland
                        Exp. Beach
                        DevExp. Beach
                        Freah Marsh
                        Mangrove
                        Shelt. Water
                        Dike or levee
                    f>
                    Illl
                     •
Dev. Upland
Dev. Lowland
High Dunes
Shett. Beach
Dev. Shelt. B.
Salt Marsh
Tidal Flat
Open Sea
Blank
                                           ft
                                           0
H
                                           II
       Figure  14.
The Salt Marshes of Southern San  Francisco  Bay, California,
Expand  into Unprotected,  Undeveloped Lowlands with
High-Scenario  Sea Level  Rise
                                             150

-------
     Nationally, the  fifty-seven sites selected for study  include  485,000 ha
(1,198,000 acres)  of coastal  wetlands.   Under  the high scenario,  about 7355
(354,000 ha,  or 874,000 acres)  of all  wetlands considered were lost to rising
seas by 2100.   However,  formation of new wetlands  reduced  the loss to 56? of
the  1975  wetland  area.   Under  the  low scenario,  about  40$  (192,000  ha,  or
^74,000 acres) of the  1975 wetlands  were  inundated,  but new wetlands extended
°ver 85,100 ha  (210,200 acres),  leaving a net  reduction by 2100 of 107,000 ha
(264,300 acres) or 22% of the 1975 wetlands.  The apparent national pattern is
dominated by  the Gulf  Coast,  especially  the Mississippi  Delta,  and  by the
South Atlantic regions where the largest wetland areas  are found.

     In summary, some  areas  may  exhibit  an increase in  wetlands  if lowlands
are permitted  to  be inundated  by  sea  level rise;  and  in some areas existing
wetlands may  persist well into  the the  next century.   Over extensive areas of
the United States,  however, catastrophic wetland losses will  have  occurred by
2100 if  present practices  of  inadequately  protecting  existing wetlands are
followed and  if adjacent lowlands are not  reserved for  wetland migration.


REFERENCES

Armentano, T.  V.,  R. A.  Park,  and C.  L.  Cloonan.   Impacts on Wetlands Through-
     out the  United States.   In Impact of  Sea Level Rise on  Coastal Wetlands
     in the  United  States,   157-271.   Washington,  DC:   U.S.  Environmental
     Protection Agency.   In press.

Barth,  M.  C.,  and J.  G.  Titus.   1984.  Greenhouse  Effect and Sea  Level Rise.
     New York:  Van  Nostrand Reinhold.

^owder,  J.  A., H.  A. Bartley,  and K. S.  Davis.   1985.   A probabilistic model
     of the relationship between  marshland-water interface  and marsh disinte-
     gration.   Ecological  Modelling 29:245-260.

costanza,  R.,  C. Neill, S. G.  Leibowitz, J.  R.  Fruci,  L.  M.  Bahr,  Jr.,  and J.
     W.  Day,  Jr.   1983.   Ecological Models of the Mississippi Deltaic Plain
     Regional   Data Collection and Presentation.  Washington,  D.C:   U.S.  Fish
     and Wildlife Service,  Division of Biological Services,  FWS/OBS-82/68.

c°stanza,  R.  and F.  H.  Sklar.   1985.   Articulation,  accuracy and effectiveness
     of mathematical  models:    A review of freshwater wetland applications.
     Ecological Modelling  27:45-68.

     ,  R.  A.    1985.   Coastal Sedimentary Environments.   New  York:   Springer-
     Verlag.

     J.  W., Jr., W.  G.  Smith,  P. R. Wagner,  and W. C. Stowe.   1973.   Community
     structure  and  carbon  budget of a  salt marsh  and  shallow bay  estuarine
     system   in Louisiana.    Baton  Rouge:    Center  for  Wetland   Resources,
     Louisiana  State University,  Publ.  No.  LSU-SG-72-04.

       K.O.,  and E.  Uchupi.    1972.   Western North  Atlantic Ocean  Memoir 17.
     Tulsa, OK:  American  Association of Petroleum Geologists.
                                     151

-------
Hoffman,  J.S.    1984.    Estimates  of  future sea  level  rise.   In Greenhouse
     Effect and  Sea  Level Rise, M. C. Earth and  J.  G.  Titus, eds.  New York:
     Van Mostrand Reinhold.

Kana,  T.W.,  W.C.  Eiser,  B.J.  Baca,  and  M.L.  Williams.    New  Jersey Case
     Study.   In Impact  of  Sea Level  Rise  on  Coastal Wetlands  in the United
     States,  107-156.    Washington,  D.C.:   U.S.    Environmental Protection
     Agency.  In press.
Lugo, A. E. and M. M.
     wetlands.    In
Brinson.  1978.  Calculations of the value of salt water
Wetland  Functions   and   Values:     The  State  of  Ou£
     Understanding 120-130.  American Water Resources Association.

Mann, K.H.   1972.   Macrophyte Production  and  Detritus  Food Chains in Coastal
     Waters.   Detritus  and  its  Ecological  Role  in  Aquatic  Ecosystems  U.
     Melchiorri-Santolini  and J.  W.  Hopton,   eds.,  Memories  dell'Institute
     Italiano di Idrobiologia 29 Supp.:353-383.

Mitsch,  W. J., J. W.  Day,  Jr.,  J.  R. Taylor,  and C. H.  Madden.   1982.  Models
     of North American freshwater  wetlands.   International Journal of Ecol££t-
     and Environmental Science 8:109-104.

Park, R. A., T.V. Armentano,  and C.  L.  Cloonan.  1986.   Predicting the Impact
     of Sea  Level Rise  on Coastal Systems.   In Supplementary Proceedings__£°£
     the 1986 Eastern Simulation Conference, Norfolk, VA,  149-153.

Pope, R.  M. and  J.  G.  Gosselink.   1973.   A  tool  for  use in  making  land"
     management decisions  involving  tidal  marshland.   Coastal Zone ManagejngSS.
     Journal 1:65-74.

Sklar,  F.   H.,  R.  Costanza,  and  J.  W.   Day,  Jr.  1985.   Dynamic  spatial
     simulation modeling  of coastal  wetland  habitat succession.   Ecolo£i£§i
     Modelling 29:261-281.

Teal,  J.  M.  1962.    Energy  flow in the  salt marsh  ecosystem  of  Georgia-
     Ecology 43:614-624.

Teal, J. and M.  Teal.  1969.  Life  and  death  of the  Salt Marsh.  Audubon-
     York:  Audubon-Ballantine.

Thurman, H.  V.  1983.  Essentials of Oceanography.  Columbus, Ohio:  Charles E-
     Merrill.
Titus, J. G., Greenhouse  Effect,  Sea Level Rise,  and Wetland Loss.  In
     of Sea Level Rise  on Coastal Wetlands in the United States.  Washington'
     DC:  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  In press.

Wiegert, R. G., R.  R. Christian,  J.  L.  Gallagher, J. R. Hall, R. D. H.
     and R.  L.  Wetzel.    1975.   A  preliminary  ecosystem model  of  a coa
     Georgia Spartina marsh.  In Estuarine Research, L.E. Cronin, ed., vol.  '
     583-601.  New York:   Academic Press.
                                      152

-------
Increased Storms and Estuarine Salinity and Other
Ecological Impacts of the Greenhouse Effect

Donald de Sylva
Rosenstiel School of Marine and Atmospheric Science
University of Miami
     !, Florida USA
ABSTRACT

     Increased concentrations  of CC^ and other trace gases, as well as  the
Codification of the ozone layer by chlorofluorocarbons,  should contribute  to
the  atmospheric greenhouse effect and warming  of the  earth's surface.   First,
the  principal effects  of air temperature rise  should  result in an increase  in
Relative  humidity  and  changes  in wind pressure systems which would  reduce
G°oling sea breezes along coastal areas.  Changes  in  global rainfall patterns
"^Y  result in decreased  rainfall  in  tropical and  subtropical regions  for
jinking water, industry,  and agriculture,  and a reduced supply of freshwater
Rowing into  brackish estuaries, which are nursery grounds  for most  recrea-
tional  and commercial  fisheries.   The resulting  increased  salinity  would
Jftduce salt-loving nuisance organisms—some of which  are noxious or dangerous
t°  human  health—to  move  upstream.    In  the  tropics,  loss  of  coastal
Ve8etation, principally mangroves,  would  reduce the protective advantage  it
        beaches   and  waterfront property   against  normal  wave  action and
           Pollutant-disposal  effectiveness in estuaries would be  reduced.
      , the principal effects of sea surface temperature  (SST) rise will  be  to
  crease  the  frequency of tropical cyclones which  may  restore  some  expected
?°ss in rainfall  onto the land.  The kinds of marine organisms and fisheries
   the tropics will decrease  in diversity  and  shift  poleward,  while tropical
       such  as   corals will become stressed  and  may perish,  together with
    r  value  as recreational attractions and as protection  against shoreline
et>osion.   Pollutant effects in coastal ecosystems should be synergistically
*°Pe severe at higher sea surface temperatures.  Survival of exotic freshwater
 ishes, diseases,  and  aquatic parasites may increase.  Finally the effects  of
5ea-level rise may be  limited biologically,  including coral reef die-off, but
*j°astal  beach erosion  would  be severely   exacerbated  and  would  result   in
^struction of waterfront property, marinas, roads, and  causeways  as well  as
Damage  to coastal  energy facilities,  freshwater   aquifer   supplies,   and
°°astal   toxic  waste   facilities  through  saltwater   corrosion  of   metal
c°ntainers.   A suggestion is  made for  aquatic  organisms and their ecosystems


                                   153

-------
to  be  used as  possible indicators of  rising sea level  and increasing  water
temperatures.

INTRODUCTION

     The  causes and  effects  of  the  "greenhouse  effect" and  associated sea
level  rise are well  covered by  Schneider and  Chen  (1980), Earth  and  Titus
(1984), and the various  papers  of Volumes 1  and 4.  This paper considers some
marine ecological  effects  that apparently have  not  been considered, together
with suggestions on how to use subtle changes in marine ecosystems as possible
indicators of the greenhouse effect.

INCREASED STORMS

     Rising air  temperature  resulting from an  increase  in atmospheric carbon
dioxide (COp)  and  other greenhouse gases will  increase  sea surface tempera-
tures (SST) (Wendland 1977; Manabe and Stouffer  1980).  Warm water of at  least
26.8°C (77°F)  is  needed to supply energy for  generation of storms (Wendland
1977;  Serra  and Buendia  1976).    These  storms  are  known as typhoons  in the
western Pacific  Ocean and as hurricanes  in  the  Atlantic and eastern Pacifi°
oceans.   The  El Nino/Southern  Oscillation of  1982-83 in the eastern Pacifi°
(Reed  1983;  Rasmusson and Carpenter  1984;  Mechoso,  Kitoh,  and Arakawa  1985*
Gray 1984) resulted in a doubling of  the  average frequency of hurricanes fro"1
ten  to twenty.   Thus,  low-lying coastal regions of the  world,   which are
subjected  to  6-7 billion U.S.  dollars in  damage each  year,  as  well as 20,000
deaths worldwide (Anthes 1982), would be  subjected to increased frequency and
intensity  of  tropical cyclones,  an increase  in the duration  of the cyclone
season, and  an  increase  in  the  surface water  area of warmer  sea  surface
temperature  for cyclone  generation.    Storm  surges  caused  by  rising   water
resulting  from  landward  movement  of these huge  storms would also increase in
frequency, severity, and duration  (Bruun 1962).

     Two  anticipated  feedbacks from  the  greenhouse  effect, which  will  als°
increase  damage  caused  by cyclones, are  associated with an expected  rise in
water temperature.  Two  natural buffers against  storm destruction of coastal-
areas are  coral reefs and mangrove  forests.    Increased  coastal  erosion fr°"J
cyclones  will  result  in  increased water  siltation,  which  reduces  growth °*
corals or kills  them  (Adey  1978; Tomascik  and  Sander  1985).    A Holocene
barrier reef  along the  southeastern  Florida  shelf  is believed  to  have died
around 7,000  years ago  as a result  of erosion  of  the  shelf  soil  cover and
consequent smothering of  coral  (Lighty,  Maclntyre,  and Stuckenrath  1978)-
Furthermore,   an  increase  in surface  temperatures of  only  slightly  above an
ambient temperature  of  30°C  (86°F) will  cause  coral  mortality  (Jaap   19#5f
Glynn 1985; Lasker, Peters, and Coffroth  1984).   A doubling of C02 could ais°
lead to a decrease in ocean pH from 8.1  to about 7.8 (Bach 1980; Holm-Hansen
1982; Ausubel  1983),  which would  cause  a  dissolution  of  the calcium carbonate
skeletons of which corals are made.

     Mangroves  and other  vegetation  will  migrate landward with  rising sea
level, but such  mitigation will be inhibited  by manmade developments such
bulkheads, levees,  and  other  structures  (Titus,  Henderson, and  Teal
Thus,  the  protective  buffering effects of coral reefs and  mangroves
cyclones  will  be   reduced as  a result  of  sea  level  rise  and  increas
temperatures.


                                      154

-------
     A third  feedback  of the greenhouse warming is an increase in evaporation
and precipitation (Manabe and Stouffer  1980), which would lead to increases  in
relative humidity in the lower  troposphere (Manabe and Wetherald 1975).  This
should result  in greater electrical demand  for  air  conditioning,  and hence a
greater release  of  C02  into  the atmosphere in  places where  fossil  fuels are
used for electricity generation.

SEA LEVEL RISE AND EROSION, INUNDATION, AND SALINITY INTRUSION

     Sea  level  rise  should  cause  increased  coastal  erosion and  shoreline
inundation because of higher normal tide levels as well as increased temporary
surge levels during storms (Sorensen, Weisman, and Lennon 1984).  An accelera-
tion of beach erosion in regions already eroding will occur and possibly cause
a start in  areas previously unaffected by  erosion.   This will happen because
erosion from  waves and  currents  can  encroach  further  up the beach profile
(Sorensen,  Weisman,  and Lennon  1984).    Storm  surges  will  be  especially
damaging from sea level rise in funnel-shaped bays and estuaries.

     Saltwater  intrusion  will   be  experienced   primarily  in  estuaries  and
aquifers  (Parker 1955),   especially  along  karst limestone coastlines  (Bowen
1982),  which  are found in many  of the low-lying countries of the world.   As
fresh water continues to  be withdrawn  for  consumptive water uses  and as human
Population centers continue  to  migrate toward the coast,  the amount of fresh
Water used will increase accordingly.  Rainfall will decrease, at least in the
summer, and reduce  the amount  of  fresh water entering estuaries  (Manabe and
Stouffer 1980).  Saltwater intrusion in estuaries will cause more saline water
to move further  upstream,  especially during droughts.  Problems  arising from
saltwater  intrusion into ground  water  include  public  health risks  from higher
concentrations of sodium chloride  (a principal  component  of sea water), which
is believed  to  exacerbate  high blood  pressure  in  humans (Braun and  Florin
1963).   Also  important  are  increased costs of water  treatment  to  remove salt
from water  for  human  consumption  (Hull,  Thatcher,  and Tortoriello  1986),
agricultural  irrigation, manufacturing,   and  electricity  generation  (Bowen
1982; Titus  and Barth  1984).    Plumbing  and machinery will  also be  damaged
(Hull,  Thatcher,  and Tortoriello  1986).    Hazardous waste  sites  in  coastal
areas,  which contain metal drums, would be subject to damage because  sea water
is highly corrosive to metal  (Flynn et al.  1984).  All problems of  saltwater
intrusion  caused by sea  level  rise will be  heightened by projected  increases
in freshwater  withdrawals for  human  use  (Wilson  1982).   It is important  to
note, for example, that  the State of Florida apparently  has  no official plan
to cope with  sea level  rise  and saltwater intrusion  (Tschinkel and Berquist
1986),  although  this is  being  given serious thought  in at  least  the Delaware
River Estuary  (Hull  and Titus 1986).

SEA LEVEL  RISE AND ESTUARINE ECOLOGY

     Estuaries are among the most  highly productive ecosystems  (Ketchum 1967;
°dum 1971; Coutant  1981).   They  are characterized as areas  where  freshwater
Divers  flow into the sea and where tidal action  brings about  a mixing of salt
water and  fresh water (Odum  1971).   Estuaries, salt marshes,  mangrove swamps,
and freshwater  marshes  are  all considered  important in  providing  food  and
Protection for a variety  of fishes, invertebrates, and birds.
                                      155

-------
     The dominant  effects which have  been observed  following  damming,  with-
drawal, or diversion  of  freshwater flows are summarized  as  follows (Snedaker
et al.  1977), recognizing, however, that  such consequences will be greater or
lesser depending upon the absolute reduction in  the normal discharge:

     •  Nearshore waters become more saline.

     •  Mixing due to salinity differences is diminished.

     •  A salt-wedge may develop farther upstream in the discharge channel.

     •  Saltwater intrusion appears in coastal groundwater and surface water.

     •  The estuary is starved of essential nutrients of terrestrial origin.

     •  Benthic  substrate   tends   to  become  anaerobic  and   heavy  metals
        sequestered  in  the  substrate  are  liberated; sulfur  cycles  become
        dominant.

     •  Particulate and  soluble organic matter  inputs are reduced and/or are
        flocculated and deposited nearshore rather than being dispersed.

     •  Certain fisheries are lost in their entirety for a variety of reasons >
        such  as  elevated salinity, reduction  in food  supply,  and  loss  of a
        large area of low salinity.

     •  Euryhaline  species  lose  dominance  to  stenohaline   species and,  i°
        general, selection is for species adapted to the new conditions.

     •  Salt-tolerant mosquito and dipteran populations increase.

     •  Schistosomiasis becomes rampant.

     •  All negative effects are aggravated during low-flow periods.

     •  Saltmarshes  and/or  mangroves  and  seagrass  beds  deteriorate  under*
        constantly elevated salinity.

     *  Renourishment of sand/silt ceases; downstream shoals erode.

     •  Littoral drift patterns are altered as well as nearshore circulation.
     As  sea  level rises,  salt water will move  farther into  the  estuary
prevent  this  freshwater  outflow  (Stone et  al.  1978).    These  effects are
complex  and  intertwined,  as  summarized  by  Snedaker,  deSylva, and  Cottrell
(1977), and which are reviewed as follows:

Fresh water in estuaries is important as:

     •  Diluter  of  salt water.   Lighter fresh  water  runs off  land  and
        rivers,  then  toward  the sea, while heavier  salt  water moves into
        estuary.  This forms a salt-wedge, which extends significant distances
        up the  river  channel  (Pritchard 1967).   A rise  in  sea  level woul"
        extend the upstream movement of the salt wedge.


                                      156

-------
     •  Protector of fish, shrimp, oysters, and other biota.  The temperature,
        salinity,  food,  substrate,   and  protection  found  in  estuaries  is
        balanced for a  host  of organisms to carry  out their life cycles, and
        this optimum combination cannot be found in environments that are more
        saline or less  saline  (Odum  and Heald  1975).   Between  66%  and 90$ of
        the U.S. fisheries depend upon estuaries for their life cycle (Douglas
        and Stroud 1971).  The dependence of fisheries upon estuaries has been
        documented  for  other  parts  of   the   world  (e.g.,  MacNae  1968).
        Estuaries provide sites  for  reproduction  and  protection  of  young,
        moderate water  temperatures,  osmoregulation  of  the  salt  balance  in
        marine organisms  (Fontaine  1975),  and an environment that  is optimum
        for  larval  and  juvenile  fishes and  invertebrates  (Heald  and  Odum
        1972).

     One of  the  most  important functions  of estuaries,  including  the  fresh-
water-dependent salt marshes  and mangroves,  is their contribution in providing
organic and inorganic  nutrients from  the breakdown of their leaves,  stems, and
roots (Heald  and Odum  1972).   Adverse effects  on  estuarine productivity have
been caused  by  diversion of fresh water away from marshlands  (Carter  et al.
1973).   A  decrease  in  the catch  of fish  and  invertebrates  in  South Vietnam
followed  the  nearly  complete  herbicidal  defoliation   of mangrove  forests
(deSylva and  Michel  1974;  deSylva  1975).    Decreases  in freshwater  runoff
caused by rising sea level would decrease the food resources or  nutrients that
form the basis of the  food chain (Heald 1970; Reeve 1975).

     Estuaries also offer protection  to organisms  by reducing  predation and
competition  because  the  combined conditions  of  temperature,  salinity,  and
turbidity,  to name a  few,  cannot  be  tolerated  by organisms normally  found in
offshore regions, but which are stenotopic  and  cannot adjust to the eury topic
conditions  of the estuary (Green 1968).

     The larvae  of  marine organisms  that utilize  the estuary  for  protection
are able  to  carry  out  relatively long-distance horizontal  movements  toward
toore suitable habitats  by  selectively  responding to either ebb  or  flood tide
water characteristics   (Hughes  1969).    Changes  in  freshwater  balance  from
estuaries due to increased salinity could thus  affect  the survival  of pelagic
larvae .

     Estuaries also  act  as  cutting and  filling mechanisms.  Rivers  carry  an
6stimated 30 billion metric tons per year of suspended material  to  the  oceans
(Turekian 1968).  The  best examples of  this material, which is derived  from
eposion  of  the continental  landscape, are  found  in  areas where  deltas  are
forming.   These  are  regions  where  a  river   carries  more  sediment into  a
Banding body of water than can be carried  away by  waves and currents.   Here,
the river velocity drops  and  the  suspended sediments  are  deposited.  Much  of
this deposition  occurs   at  the river  mouth as a  sandbar deposit or  as  an
Alluvial plain,  which  eventually  becomes a salt marsh  or a mangrove  swamp,
WUch acts  as a  barrier to storms and surges to protect  the  land behind  them
(Warnke  1967).  A rise  in sea level would reduce the amount of  sediment-laden
^Unoff entering the  coastal zone,  thus reducing the protective nature  of the
sandbars.   Salt marshes  faced with rising sea level  and  a reduction in  river-
      sediments  could  be  converted  to  open-water  habitats,  due  to  drowning
'Orsen,  Panageotou,  and  Leatherman  1985).
                                     157

-------
     The reduction of  freshwater  inflow  into estuarine systems and consequent
increase  in  salinity  has  resulted  in  considerable  changes  in  fisheries,
currents, plankton, and benthos (Neiman 197*0; has caused extensive changes  in
salt-marsh  ecosystems  (Hoese  1967);  and has  changed spawning  migrations  of
economically  important fishes  (Massmann  1971).    The  latter  phenomenon  is
believed  to  occur  because  many  estuarine-dependent  fishes,  and  probably
invertebrates, respond to very  slight  gradients on brackish water, turbidity,
or dissolved organic compounds  to give  them olfactory cues that trigger their
migrations  (Frolander  1964; Hoese  1967).    A  high correlation  has  also  been
shown between white shrimp catches and freshwater  input into estuaries (Gunter
and  Edwards 1967).   Salinity  increases  in estuaries due  to sea  level  rise
would diminish the freshwater runoff of estuaries  and concomitantly reduce the
various  physio-chemical  signals  that  organisms use  to  guide them  into  the
estuaries.

     An  increase  in   estuarine  salinity  would  favor  the establishment  of
nuisance organisms, which  normally  are excluded  from the  estuary  because  of
the  low  salinity.   This effect would be exacerbated  if  sea  surface tempera-
tures were  also  to  increase,  because  many of these nuisance  organisms  are
tropical, and can  become  part of new coastal  ecosystem  shifts,  which already
has  occurred  as  the  result  of warm-water  discharges from electrical  power
stations (Krenkel  and  Parker  1969;  deSylva  1969).   Among these high-salinity
organisms are  the destructive  mollusk Teredo  (or shipworm),  the crustacean
Limnoria,  and  barnacles,   which  destroy  wooden   structures   such as  docks,
pilings, and boats, causing extensive economic damage.   Barnacles,  which are
scarcer  in  estuaries  than  in areas  of higher  salinity (Moore  and Frue 1959)»
cause  fouling  of  submerged  objects,  especially   boat hulls,  which must  be
periodically hauled and scraped (Ray  1959).   (Barnacle-oyster  communities may
prove  to be  very  good  indicators of  both  sea  level  rise  and  increasing
salinity in estuaries [Wanless  1982].)

     Stingrays are bottom-feeding coastal fishes that can crush mollusks with
their powerful  jaws.   In coastal areas,  they cause  extensive damage to  clam
beds.  Their movement into estuaries as salinity increases would be associated
with extensive  damage to oyster  beds.   Similarly,  oyster drills  and  oyster
parasites, normally absent from estuaries because  of their intolerance for low
salinity, should  increase   their  infestation of oyster  beds.    Sharks,  which
normally are not  present  in estuaries, which have low salinity levels,  would
be  more likely  to enter  higher salinity  estuaries,  thus posing  potential
dangers to humans engaging in water  sports.

     Estuaries play an important function in dispersing pollutants.  Normally'
well-mixed  estuaries  with   rapid  flushing  rates  can  dilute pollutants  rather
quickly  (Pritchard  1967).     However,  reduced  circulation   from  increased
salinity due  to sea  level  rise  should diminish  the ability  of  estuaries  to
perform this function.

     It  is  clear,  based  upon the results of  the National Symposium on Fresh-
water Flow  to Estuaries (Cross  and  Williams  1981),  that  freshwater flow play3
an  intricate  and  complex  role  in  the functioning  of estuarine  ecosystems-
Rising  sea  level  will  surely  decrease  freshwater  input into  estuaries  and
reduce estuarine ecological and economic importance to mankind.
                                      158

-------
 RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS

     Meteorologists,   physical  oceanographers,  atmospheric   chemists,  and
 geophysicists  have tried  to  document  the "greenhouse effect"  and resulting
 climate change  by  attempting to detect statistically significant increases  in
 air and water  temperatures,  glacial melting and  retreat,  and  sea level rise.
 One problem  seems  to be that  the  variance fluctuates greatly  about trends  in
 the  mean  values,   the so-called  "signal-to-noise  ratio."   However,  there
 appears  to  be  little  effort  by  biologists  to  use  aquatic  species   or
 communities  as  biological indicators  of rises  in  sea level  and  sea surface
 temperatures,  or  changes  in  dissolved  gases  or  ionic concentrations.   Sea
 level changes  have long been  known to  be  reflected in zonation of intertidal
 communities  (Scholl and Stuiver  1967;  Cubit 1985),  while  more  recent evidence
 can be  seen in a corresponding  rise  in  the  location of  an  oyster-barnacle
 community  in a  Coral  Gables,  Florida,  coastal waterway between  1949 and 1981
 of 15 cm {Wanless  1982).

     Slight increases in water temperatures result in subtle changes in marine
 and freshwater organisms,  which show physiological, behavioral, and ecological
 responses  (Kinne 1984).  Species and community shifts have thus been observed
 during long-term climate fluctuations  on the U.S.  Pacific coast (Hubbs  1948),
 over rather  short  periods  due to El Nino  (Gerard  1984; Glynn  1984),  and over
 longer periods  in the  North  Sea  (Gushing 1978; Blacker  1957)  and  in North
 America (Dow 1969; Gushing and Dickson 1976).   Short-term changes are seen as
 a result of thermal pollution, in which entire ecosystem shifts along a coast-
 line  can  be  documented  as   a  result  of warmer   sea surface  temperatures
 resulting from warm-water discharges from electrical power plants (Krenkel and
 Parker 1969;  deSylva 1969; Kinne 1984).

     It would seem  that a golden opportunity  is  thus presented  to marine and
 freshwater ecologists  to  benefit from  the  extensive literature on  the rela-
 tionships between aquatic organisms and  increased  temperatures to  monitor the
 Slobal experiment known as the "greenhouse  effect."

 REFERENCES

 Adey,  W.H. 1978.   Coral reef morphogenesis:   A multivariate model.   Science.
     202 (4370):831-37.

 Anthes,   A.  1982.    Tropical  cyclones:    Their  evaluation,  structure,  and
     effects.  Boston:   Amer. Meteorol. Soc.

 Ausubel,  H.  1983.   Can we assess  the  impacts  of climatic change?   Climatic
     Change 5(1):7-14.

 Bach,  W.   1980.    Climatic  effects of increasing  atmospheric  C02  levels.
     Experientia 36(7):796-806.

Barth,  M.C.,  and J.G. Titus,  eds.  1984. Greenhouse  effect  and  sea  level rise.
     New  York:  Van  Nostrand.

Blacker,  R.W.  1957. Benthic  animals as indicators of hydrographic  conditions
     and  climate  change in  Svalbard  waters.   Fish.  Invest. London Ser.  II,
     20(10):1-49.
                                     159

-------
Bowen, R. 1982.  Surface water.  New York:  John Wiley.

Braun,  P.,   and  A.A.  Florin.  1963.    Drinking  water  and congestive  heart
     failure—sodium concentration of selected  New  Jersey water supplies.  Ji
     Med. Soc. New Jersey. 60:504-9.

Bruun, P. 1962.  Sea level rise as a cause of shore erosion.  J. Waterw. Harbj.
     Div. 88(WWI):117-130.

Carter, M.R.,  L.A.  Burns,  T.R. Cavinder,  J.R.  Dugger,  P.L.  Fore,  D.B. Hicks,
     H.L. Revells,  and T.W.  Schmidt.   1973.    Ecosystem analysis of  the BJ£
     Cypress Swamp and estuaries.   Atlanta,  GA: U.S.  Environmental Protection
     Agency, 904/9-74-002.

Coutant,  C.C.   1981.    Foreseeable  effects  of  COp-induced climate  change:
     Freshwater concerns.   Environ. Conserv. 8(4):285-97.

Cross,  R.D.,   and  D.L. Williams,  eds.  1981.   Proceedings  of the  National
     Symposium on Freshwater  Flow to Estuaries.   Fish  and  Wildlife  Service,
     U.S. Dept. Interior,  Biol. Serv.  Progr. FWS/OBS-81/04,2 vols.

Cubit, J.D.  1985. Possible effects of recent changes in sea level on the biota
     of a Caribbean coral  reef flat and predicted effects of rising sea level-
     Proc. Fifth Intl.  Coral Reef Congr..  Tahiti 3:111-118.

Gushing,  D.H.  1978.  Biological effects of  climate  change.  Rapp.  P.-V.  Reunj.
     Cons. Int. Explor. Mer. 173:107-116.

Gushing,  D.H., and  R.R. Dickson.  1976.  The  biological  response in the sea to
     climatic change. Adv. Mar. Biol.  14:1-122.

deSylva,  D.P.  1969.   Theoretical  considerations  of  the  effects of heated
     affluents on marine fishes.   In Biological aspects of thermal pollution*
     eds. P.A.  Krenkel and F.L.  Parker,  pp.  229-93.  Nashville:  Vanderbilfc
     Univ. Press.

deSylva,  D.P.  1975.   Nektonic food web in  estuaries.   In Estuarine research*
     ed. L.E. Cronin, Vol. 1,  420-47.  New York:  Academic Press.

deSylva, D.P., and H.B. Michel.  1974.   Effects  of mangrove defoliation on the
     estuarine ecology  and fisheries  of South Vietnam.   In The  effects_J>l
     herbicides in South Vietnam,  Part B.  Working  Papers.  Washington, D.C-:
     National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.

Douglas,  P.A.,  and  R.H.  Stroud,  eds.  1971.    A  symposium on  the biolog
     significance of estuaries.  Washington, D.C.: Sport Fishing Institute

Dow,  R.L.  1969.  Cyclic and  geographic  trends in  seawater temperature
     abundance of American lobster. Science 146:1060-63.

Flynn, T.J., S.G. Walesh,  J.G. Titus,  and  M.C.  Barth.  1984.  Implications of
     sea  level rise for  hazardous waste sites  in  coastal floodplains.   *
     Greenhouse  effect  and sea  level  rise,  eds.  M.C. Barth and  J.G. Titus,
     271-94.  New York:  Van Nostrand Reinhold.


                                      160

-------
Fontaine, M.  1975.   Physiological mechanisms  in the migration  of marine and
     amphihaline fish.   In Advanced marine biology,  eds. F.S. Russell and C.M.
     Yonge,  vol. 13, 241-355.

Frolander, H.F.  1964.   Biological and  chemical features of  tidal estuaries.
     J. Wat.  Pollut. Control Fed.  38(8):1037-48.

Gerard, V.A.  1984.   Physiological effects  of El Nifflo on giant kelp in Southern
     California. Mar. Biol.  Lett. 5:317-22.

Glynn, P.W.  1984.  Widespread coral mortality  and the  1982-83 El Nifflo warming
     event.   Environ. Conserv.  11(2):133-146.

Glynn, P.W.  1985.  Corallivore population sizes  and  feeding  effects following
     El Nino  (1982-1983)  associated with  coral mortality  in Panama.   Proc.
     Fifth Intl. Coral  Reef  Congr.  (Tahiti)  4:183-8.

Gray, W.M. 1984.  Atlantic seasonal hurricane  frequency.  Part I:  El Nino and
     30 mb Quasi-Biennial Oscillation  influences.   Mon.  Wea. Rev.  112:1649-
     1668.

Green, J.S.  1968.  The  biology  of estuarine  animals.  Seattle: Univ. Washington
     Press.

Gunter, G.,  and J.C. Edwards. 1967.  The  relations  of  rainfall and freshwater
     drainage to the production of the penaeid shrimps  (Penaeus  fluviatilis
     and P.  aztecus) in  Texas  and Louisiana  waters.   Proc.  World Sci.  Conf.
     Biol. Culture  of Shrimps and Prawns.   FAO Fish.  Repts.  57(3):875-92.

Heald, E.J.   1970.   The Everglades estuary:   An example of  seriously reduced
     inflow of water.  Trans. Am. Fish.  Soc. 99:847-8.

     , E.J.,  and W.E.  Odum.  1972.   Trophic analyses of an estuarine mangrove
     community.   Bull.  Mar.  Sci.  22(3):671-738.

     , H.D.  1967.   Effects  of  higher  than normal salinities  on  salt marshes.
     Contr. Mar. Sci. Univ.  Texas 12:249-61.

Holm-Hansen,  0.  1982.  Effects  of increasing CO^ on  ocean  biota,   vol. 13,  pt.
     5. Washington,  D.C.:  U.S.  Dept. of  Energy.-USDOE 013.

     , C.L.  1948.   Changes  in  the fish fauna  of western North America  corre-
     lated with changes in ocean  temperature.  J.  Mar. Res. 7:459-82.

         D.A.   1969.    Responses  to salinity  change  as  a  tidal  transport
     mechanism for  pink shrimp.  Penaeus  duorarum. Biol.  Bull.  139:43-53.

    ,  C.H.J.,  H:L.  Thatcher,  and  R.C.  Tortoriello.  1986.    Salinity in  the
     Delaware estuary.   In Greenhouse  effect,   sea level rise, and  salinity in
     the  Delaware  Estuary,     15-39.    Washington,  D.C.:  U.S.  Environmental
     Protection Agency.  EPA  230-05-86-010.
                                     161

-------
Hull, C.H.J., and J.G. Titus,  (eds)  1986.   Greenhouse effect^ sea level risgj.
     and  salinity  in  the  Delaware  Estuary,  55-67.   Washington,  D.C.:  U.S.
     Environ. Protect. Agency. EPA 230-05-86-010.

Jaap, H.C. 1985.  An epidemic zooxanthellae expulsion during 1983 in the lower
     Florida Keys coral reefs:  hyperthermic  etiology.   Proc.  5th Intl. Coral
     Reef Congr. (Tahiti),  6:143-8.

Ketchum, B.H. 1967.   Phytoplankton nutrients  in  estuaries.   In Estuaries, ed.
     G.A. Lauff, 329-35.   New York: Academic Press.

Kinne,  0.,  ed.  1984.  Marine ecology.  Vol.  5.   Ocean management.  New York:
     John Wiley.

Krenkel,  P. A.,  and  F.L.  Parker,   eds.  1969.    Biological effects  of thermal
     pollution.   Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

Lasker,   H.R.,   E.G.   Peters,  and  M.A.  Coffroth.   1984.   Bleaching of  reef
     coelenterates in the San Bias Islands, Panama. Coral Reefs 3(4): 183-90.

Lighty,   R.G., I.G.  Maclntyre, and R.  Stuckenrath. 1978.  Submerged Holocene
     barrier reef Southeast Florida Shelf.  Nature 276(5683) :59-60.

MacNae,  W.  1968.  A  general  account  of  the fauna and flora of mangrove swamp3
     and  forests  in  the Indo-West-Pacific region.   In Adv. Mar.  Biol.,  ed.
     F.S. Russell and C.M.  Yonge,  vol. 6,  74-270.

Manabe,  S., and  R.V. Stouffer. 1980.   Sensitivity of a global climate model to
     an  increase  of C02 concentration  in the  atmosphere.   J.  Geophys. Jteg*
     85:5529-54.

Manabe,  S,, and R. Wetherald.  1975.   The  effects of doubled  COp concentration
     on the climate of a general circulation model.  J.  Atmos.  Sci.  32:3-15-

Manabe,  S.,  R.  Wetherald,  and R.J. Stouffer. 1981.   Summer  dryness due to an
     increase of atmospheric C02 concentration.   Climatic Change 3:347-86.
Massmann, W.H. 1971.  The significance of an estuary on the biology of
     organisms of the middle Atlantic regions.   In Symposium on the Bi
     Significance of  Estuaries, eds.  P. A. Douglas  and R.H.  Stroud,  96-1°9-
     Washington,  B.C.: Sport Fishing Institute.

Mechoso,  B.,  A.  Kitoh,  and A.  Arakawa.  1985.    Numerical simulation  of
     atmospheric response  to sea-surface  temperature  anomalies.   16th
     Hurricanes and Trop. Meteorol.  (Houston)  134-5.

Moore,  H.B.,  and  A.C.   Frue.  1959.   The  settlement  and  growth of
     improvisus,  B.  eburneus, and B. amphi trite  in the  Miami area.
     Sci. Gulf Carib.  9(4):421-42.

Neiman, A.D., ed.  1974.   Resources  of the  Azov Basin  and  prospects  for their
     development.    Trudy   Vses.   Nauch.-Issled.   Inst.   Morsk.  Ryb.
     Okeanogr . (VNIRO),  113:280 pp.  (In Russian).
                                      162

-------
Odum, E.P.  1971.  Fundamentals of ecology.  Philadelphia: W.P. Saunders.

Odum, W.E., and E.J.  Heald.  1975.   Mangrove forests  and  aquatic productiv-
     ity.   In Coupling of  land  and water systems,  ed.  A.D.  Hasler,  129-136.
     Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Orson, R.,  W.  Panageotou,  and S.P. Leatherman.  1985.   Response of tidal salt
     marshes  of  the U.S. Atlantic  and Gulf coasts  to  rising sea  level.   J^
     Coast. Res. 1(1):29-37.

Parker,   G.G.   1955.    Salt-water  contamination  of  the aquifer   from  tidal
     canals.   In Water  Resources  of  Southeastern  Florida.   U.S.  Geological
     Survey. Water-Supply Paper No. 1255:682-707.

Pritchard,  D.W.   1967.     Observation   on   circulation   in   coastal  plain
     estuaries.   In Estuaries,  ed. G.A.  Lauff, 37-44.   New  York:  Academic
     Press.

Rasmusson, E.M.,  and J.H. Carpenter. 1984.  Variations in tropical sea-surface
     temperature  and  surface  wind   fields   associated with  the  Southern
     Oscillation/El  Nino.  Mon.  Wea. Rev.  110:354-84.

Ray, D.L.,  ed.  1959.   Marine borers  and  fouling organisms.    Seattle:  Univ.
     Washington Press.

Reed, R.K.  1983.  Oceanic  warming  off the U.S.  west coast  following the 1982
     El  Nino.   Trop.  Ocean  Atmos. Newslett.  22:10-12.

Reeve,  M.R. 1975.   The  ecological  significance of zooplankton  in  the shallow
     subtropical  waters  of  South Florida.   In  Estuarine  research,  ed.  L.E.
     Cronin, 352-71.   New York:  Academic  Press.

Schneider,  S.H., and R.H.   Chen.  1980.   Carbon  dioxide warming and coastal
     flooding:  physical  factors and climatic impact.  Ann.  Rev.  Energy 5:107-
     140.

Scholl,  D.W.,  and M.  Stuiver.  1967.   Recent submergence  of southern  Florida: A
     comparison with adjacent coasts  and other  eustatic data.   Bull.  Geol.
     Soc.  Amer.   78:437-54.

sen*a,  C.S., and C.E.  Buendia.  1976.  Sea-surface  temperature anomalies  and
     hurricane  prediction.   Geofis.  int.  16(3) : 151-63.

snedaker,  S.C.,  D.P.  deSylva,  and D. Cottrell. 1977.  A  review  of the role of
     freshwater  in  estuarine  ecology,  Final  Report  to the Southwest Florida
     Water Management District, Vol.  1, 126 pp. Miami: Univ. Miami,  Rosenstiel
     School of  Marine and Atmospheric Science,  UM-RSMAS-77001 .
        ,  •R.M.,  R.N.  Weisman, and  G.P. Lennon.  1984.    Control of  erosion,
     inundation,  and  salinity  intrusion  caused  by  sea  level  rise.     In
     Greenhouse effect and  sea  level  rise,  eds.  M.C.  Barth  and J.G. Titus,
     179-214. New York: Van  Nostrand  Reinhold.
                                     163

-------
Stone, J.H., J.W. Day, Jr., L.M. Bahr, Jr., and R.A. Muller. 1978.  The impact
     of possible climate changes on estuarine ecosystems.  In Estuarine inter^
     actions, ed. M.L. Wiley, 305-21.  New York: Academic Press.

Titus, J.G.,  and M.C. Barth. 1984.   An  overview of the  cause  and effects of
     sea level rise.  In Greenhouse effect and sea level rise, eds. M.C. Barth
     and J.G. Titus,  1-56.  New York: Van Nostrand.

Titus, J.G.,  R.  Henderson, and  M.  Teal.  1984.   Sea level  rise  and wetlands
     loss in the United States.   Natl. Wetlands Newslett. 6(5):3-6.

Tomascik, T., and F. Sander. 1985.  Effects of eutrophication on reef-building
     corals.     1.    Growth  rate   of  the   reef-building   coral  Montastrea
     annularis.  Mar. Biol. 87(2):143-155.

Tschinkel, V., and  G.T.  Berquist.  1986.   The state  water use  plan:   Where do
     we go from here?  Fla. Envir. Urban  Issues. 13(3):8-12.

Turekian, K.K. 1968.  Oceans.  New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Wanless,  H.R.  1982.   Editorial:   Sea  level is rising—so what?  J. Sed. Petr.
     52(4):1051-54.

Warnke, D.A. 1967.  Conditions  of beach retrogression in a low-energy environ-
     ment.  Z. Geomorphol. 11:47-61.

Wendland,  W.M.   1977.    Tropical storm  frequencies  related  to  sea  surface
     temperatures.  J. Appl. Meteorol.  16:477-81.

Wilson, W.E. 1982.   Estimated effects  of projected  groundwater withdrawals,*^
     movement of the  saltwater front  in  the  Florida  aquifer, 1976-2000,
     Central Florida.  U.S. Geological Survey, Water Supply  Paper 2189.
                                      164

-------
Rising Sea Level and Damming of Rivers:
Possible Effects in Egypt and Bangladesh

James Broadus, John Milliman, Steven Edwards,
David Aubrey, and Frank Gable
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Woods Hole, Massachusetts USA
INTRODUCTION

     The projected worldwide rise of sea  level during the next  100 years will
be particularly hard-felt in deltaic areas where substantial  areas are barely
above sea  level.   Regional  subsidence will increase the relative rate of sea
level rise;  and damming  of large  rivers  could  prevent  sediment influx from
compensating  for   regional  subsidence,  increasing  coastal  erosion.   These
e?fects will be felt most in developing countries, where the rivers are large,
deltas  extensive  and  inhabited,  and proposed  damming of  large  rivers  may
dramatically increase coastal erosion.

     To help  understand the potential consequences  of sea level rise in the
deltaic regions of the  world, we have concentrated our attention on  two areas
that  seem  especially vulnerable:   the Nile River delta in Egypt,  which has
already been  dammed, and the delta  of the complex Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna
River system  in Bangladesh,  in  which river damming  has begun and is expected
to increase during the next  15 years.

STUDY APPROACH

     Our  general  approach  for  characterizing  possible  consequences of  sea
level rise in these two regions  has  been as follows:  First, geological infor-
^tion has been employed  to describe likely scenarios of shoreline change for
Scenarios of future dams and relative sea level  for the next 100 years.  These
scenarios  have  then been used to describe the  geographic  areas within Egypt
   Bangladesh that will be  affected by landward  transgression.

     Next, demographic  and  economic  information  has  been examined to portray
 he scale  of  economic activities within each nation that currently  originate
      the potentially affected  areas.
                                   165

-------
     Several limitations  of this approach are  immediately  obvious.   Geologi-
cally, we  know little  about  the rates  of subsidence  in either  the Nile or
Bengal deltas,  nor  do we  know  the  actual  sediment  flux  from  the Ganges-
Brahmaputra River which flows into Bangladesh.   The economic analysis reports
current,  not projected  levels of economic activity  within  the two countries.
Although techniques have  been developed and employed elsewhere to measure the
present monetary value  of potential economic  damages associated with physical
scenarios for sea level rise (Earth and  Titus 1984), we employ a more simpli-
fied way of describing the economic significance of future sea level  rise.  We
have  not  yet   attempted  to  describe  the   complex  interactions  of  social
processes that will  come  into  play in response  to  rising sea  level,   such as
the subtle social relationships  identified by Warrick and Riebsame (1983).

     Our approach employs a  highly aggregated and very coarse scale of data to
arrive at a rough characterization of the current scale of economic activities
that  are  at  stake as  relative  sea  level rise encroaches on  the  areas of
interest.   It  is extremely mechanical,  intended only  to portray the current
scale of economic activities and population in potentially affected areas.  ^
does not take into account future mitigation measures, nor adaptive responses,
nor  future  changes in  the  distributions  of  economic activities  and popula-
tion.  We  suspect that our  methods  result in  conservative  approximations °*
the economic stakes,  since we do not add future economic and population growth
to our data on current conditions.
     Deltaic  regions  may  be  particularly  susceptible  to disruptions
rising sea  level because  of the delicate  balance  achieved by  deltas  at the
river/ocean  interface  through newly  delivered  sediment  via  river transport*
local subsidence as  deltas tend  to sink, and  the erosional forces of oceanic
energy, waves,  and  storms.  In  this  analysis,  we focus  on the  net effect of
subsidence and rising  sea  level, which  consists of two primary elements:  (a'
global changes  in  sea  level;  and  (b)  local  effects  through  subsidence °r
uplift.  A third major influence that comes into play in river delta areas lS
the delivery of  new  sediments  to nourish the delta itself.  Subsidence can b®
thought of as that associated with tectonic movements and the more superficial
subsidence resulting from  compaction  and dewatering  of the soils that pile UP
to  make   the  delta.     Removal  of  sediments,   as   through upstream  dammit
projects,  reduces  the  ability of  the  delta  to build  itself seaward  or to
stabilize itself against the forces of subsidence and erosion.

     Two other  major  influences are important  for  an analysis  of potentia1
effects  of  sea level  rise on  delta  regions.   The first  is  saltwater intru-
sion.  As  sea level rises the wedge  of  salt water  that underlies the delta's
fresh ground water is  forced farther  and farther inland, contaminating ground
water used for  drinking and  agricultural purposes.   A second major consider-
ation, particularly in Bangladesh,  is increased exposure  to violent inundati011
by storm surges.
                                                                             n
     Two scenarios are examined  here.   The  more optimistic scenario -assumes
l-m (3-ft) rise  in relative sea level over the next 100 years  (Hoffman, Keyes»
and Titus  1983).   This case  can  be thought1 of  as  a 50-cm  (1.5-ft)  rise l0
eustatic sea level  combined with  a 50-cm increase  in  local  subsidence.
more  pessimistic high  case  assumes a  3-m  rise  in  relative  sea  level:
result of a  200  to  250-cm  rise in  eustatic sea level and a 50 to  100-cm lo°a
rise  due to  subsidence and  reduced sediment  delivery.    Such  reductions *


                                      166

-------
 sediment delivery  have  already  been experienced in Egypt, resulting  in  severe
 erosion  in  the delta  there;  and  such  effects  could  also be  expected  in
 Bangladesh  in  association with future water  management projects such as  dams
 and barrages upstream.

     We  now  consider  the  nature  of human  activities  taking  place  in  two
 deltas.

 EGYPT:  THE NILE RIVER  DELTA

     The  vital  role  of  the Mile  River  in  the nation's  economy  has  been
 recorded for  millenia.    Herodotus  wrote,  "Egypt is the  Nile  and  the Nile  is
 Egypt." The  population  is densely clustered  about  the  banks of the river and
 throughout  the river's delta (Figure  1).    Of the country's  million  square
 kilometer area,  only  about 35,000  square  kilometers,  or  3.5%,  is cultivated
 and settled  (Quarterly  Economic  Review of Egypt  -  1985).   This results in  an
 estimated population  density  in  1985  of  about  1,400 people for every  square
 kilometer of arable  land in the country.   The deltaic area  examined  here
 extends from just  west of  the  port city  of  Alexandria and  eastward  to  Port
 Said at  the northern  entrance to the Suez Canal.   Alexandria,  exposed since
 antiquity to the  forces  of  the  sea and historically  reached by  a  causeway
 extending to its  walled  enclosure,  today  contains about 3  million  inhabi-
 tants.   Port Said, at the eastern extremity  of our  study area, is the home  of
 nearly one half million residents.   The densely  inhabitated delta between  is
 devoted to intensive,  multi-crop agriculture,  and to urban and industrial  uses
 (Figure 2).

     Within  this  century, severe erosion has  been documented  on the  delta
 coastline (Milliman  1986).    Large  reductions  in the  delivery  of nourishing
 sediments to  the  delta  began with  the construction of the  delta  barrages  in
 1881.   Additional  diversion of  Nile sediments  resulted from the construction
of the dam  at  Aswan  in  1902  and  its enlargement in 1934.   Even  so,  approxi-
mately  80-100 million tons of sediment were delivered annually by the Nile  to
 the delta before  1964.    Closure  of the high  dam at Aswan  in  1964,  however,
entirely eliminated sediment  delivery to the  delta.   This  loss  of sediment,
combined with  tectonic  subsidence  on  the  order of  5-6 m every  few  thousand
years,  has resulted in  spectacular erosion of the Nile  delta.   As can be seen
 in Figure 3, the delta's  numerous former distributaries have been  closed down
by water management,  irrigation,  and land reclamation  projects,  so  that  the
Nile's  flow  through the  delta  is  channeled  into only two major distributaries:
the Rosetta on  the west and  the Damietta on  the east.   Many areas along  the
delta's coast have experienced annual erosion rates  in  excess  of 1 m,  between
 1966 and  1974  (Figure 3), and locally,  erosion has exceeded  100 m per year
(Milliman  1985; Bird  1985; Inman,  Aubrey,  and  Pawka  1976).
                                     167

-------
      10,000 - 20,000
      5,000 10.000
      1,000 • 5,000
       400 1,000
 |    I Ftwtr ihon 400
Figure  1.   Population Density  in  Egypt  1982
            Source:  Central Agency for  Public
            Mobilization  and Statistics  1982
                       168

-------
Figure 2.
Nile Delta
Source:  NASA
           169

-------
         MEDITERRANEAN
Erosion >l m/yr (1965-74)
  Figure 3.  Coastal Erosion on the Nile Delta
             Source:  Bird  1985
                        170

-------
     Figure  4  illustrates  the additional  landward transgression  that might
result from  a  1-m or  a 3-m rise  in  relative sea  level.   The major existing
natural defenses  against such a  retreat  on the shore are  the series of sand
dunes  along  the  delta's coast and  the  increasingly  brackish lakes—Maryut,
Idku,  Burullos, and  Manzalah—that lie behind them.   These lakes are a major
source of  the  nation's  approximately 100,000 ton  annual fish catch,  80% of
which  is   freshwater  fish.    The  area that  might  be inundated  in  the  low
scenario  represents  approximately  12$-15$ of  the  nation's  arable  land  and
contains approximately 16$ of  the nation's estimated 49 million population, or
almost 8 million  people.  The area that  could be lost to the sea in the high
scenario represents about 20$  of  the  nation's arable land and is inhabited by
over 10 million people, some 21$ of Egypt's current population.

     Assuming that agricultural output in the delta is distributed as arable
area, and  assuming that all other sectors  of economic activity,  as specified
in Table 1, are distributed  as population,  we estimate that approximately 15$
of Egypt's current gross domestic  product (GDP)  originates in the area likely
to be affected  by the 1-m increase in relative sea level.   Similarly, approxi-
mately 20$ of the nation's current GDP originates within the area likely to be
affected by a 3-m increase  in  relative sea level.   The magnitudes of economic
activities comprising GDP that thus originate in the likely affected areas are
disaggregated and reported  in Table  1.   It  is  worth  noting  here  that large
areas  apparently  targeted  for  priority  development  in  land  reclamation
projects,   both south  of Lake  Manzalah  in the region  of  Port  Said  and around
Lake Maryut  in  the  region  of Alexandria,  lie within  the area  likely  to be
flooded by even a 1-m increase in  relative sea level.

BANGLADESH:  THE GANGES-BRAHMAPUTRA-MEGHNA DELTA

     We turn now  to  the even more serious  exposure that  exists in  Bangladesh
(Figure 5).  This densely  populated nation of an estimated 93 million people
covers an  area of  143,000  square  kilometers.  Eighty  percent  of  this area is
made up of the  complex Bengal delta system created by the  Ganges,  Brahmaputra,
and Meghna Rivers.   Together, the  Ganges and the Brahmaputra currently deliver
approximately 1.6 billion  tons of sediment annually to the face  of the delta
(Milliman  and Meade  1983).   The seaward face of this delta extends some 650 km
from the  western boundary  with India to the Chittagong  Hill Tracts on  the
east.

     The country's population is widely distributed, with  heavy concentrations
in the major city of Dhaka (population about 4 million),  in  the  southwestern
city  of  Khulna   (population  800,000),   and  in  the  eastern  port  city  of
Chittagong (population about  1.5  million).   Most of the  remaining  population
is rurally dispersed  and dependent on  subsistence  agriculture.  Much  of  the
Population lives at  the very  edge of subsistence:   it is  estimated  that  85$
receive less than the 2,122  calories  per  day  considered necessary for minimal
subsistence (Jansen  1983).   Per  capita  GNP  is  approximately  $140,  compared
with that  of Egypt,  which  is  $670,  and  that of  the United States,  which is
over $13,000.  Under- and unemployment rates in Bangladesh are  estimated in
the  35-40$  range,  and  population  increase is in the  range of 2.5$-3.0$  per
annum.
                                      171

-------
      PERSONS PER SQUARE KILOMETER


      I         I    10,000-20,000

                     5,000-10,000

E.V.Y.V,
.VAVi
•^•••B

.Y.Y.Y.j .
.v.v.-.vl
•••••

1,000
400
3 M
1 M

- 5,000
-1 000


Figure 4.  One-meter and  three-meter transgression scenarios  for  relative
           sea level rise in  the Nile Delta (detail from Figure  1).

           (Note:  Dashed  segment in three-meter  scenario   projected in
           lieu of exact  topographic detail.)
                                    172

-------
      Table  1.   Economic  Activity and  Population Originating in Affected
                Region:   Egypt (1984-85)
Activity* One-Meter Scenario
Agriculture
Industry and Mining
Oil and Oil Products
Construction
Power, Water and Sanitation
Transportation, Storage, and
Communications
Trade Services and Finance
Housing
Miscellaneous Services
GDP in Affected Region
Total GDP
Percent of GDP
631
674
785
237
41
258
916
95
804
4,441
29,872
15
Three-Meter Scenario
1,052
885
1,030
311
54
338
1,202
125
1,056
6,053
29,872
20
"Values in millions of Egyptian pounds in 1984/85.  ($1 U.S. = 1.23/pounds in
 1983)

Total Estimated Population              48.6 million           48.6 million

Estimated Population in
  Affected Region                        8 million               10 million

Percent Population in
Affected Region                         16                       21
                                      173

-------
                                 0    6   10   IS   3O   26
HIG
 LOW
              Figure 5.  Infrared Aerial Photograph of Bangladesh
                         Source:  World Bank and Plate 4 of Volume 1
                                  of this report
                                       174

-------
      When  superimposed  on shoreline  retreat  from the  low  and high sea  level
  rise scenarios  (Figure  6), the spatial  distribution  of population shows  that
  approximately 9% of the nation's present population would be directly affected
  by  a  1-m  rise,  and 27% • of  the total population  would be affected  by a  3-m
  rise.   The  densely populated  area around  the southwestern  city  of  Khulna
  where  population  density  exceeds  2,900  per square kilometer,  stands  between
  the 1-m and  3-m transgression  lines (Figure 7).  Similarly, the heavily popu-
  lated environs of the Meghna  River eastward of Dhaka would clearly be  greatly
  affected in the case of a 3-m relative sea level rise.

      Exposure of the population to storm surge is an extremely grave consider-
  ation  in   Bangladesh.    On average,  1.5  severe  cyclonic  storms attack  the
  country each year with storm surge  reaching  as  far as 160 km inland in recent
  times  (Bird  and Schwartz  1985).    The May  1985 storm  is  estimated  to  have
  killed  over 5,000  people,  and the  tragic  November 1970 storm surge is believed
  to have taken  the  lives of  over  a quarter  of  a million people.   Assuming a
 similar 160-km reach  in  the  case of a 3-m relative sea level  rise,  the  area
 likely  to  be exposed  to  storm  surges 100 years hence can be seen  in  Figure 7
 as the  area  extending 160  km  beyond the  3-m  line.  The  plight of  Dhaka is
 obvious.    With increasing  population densities  in the  future, through  the
 combined effects  of natural  population  increase and  loss of territory  to
 coastal transgression, the exposure to severe storm surges will only  increase.

      In the context of storm surge,  a noteworthy feature of today's  delta is
 the  6,000-tar  mangrove  and  nepa  palm  Sundarban  Forest Preserve  in  Khulna
 District  on  the southwestern coast.   A  maze of  heavily forested waterways,
 this  preserve,  with no permanent settlement, stands out clearly in Figure 7
 Immediately behind,  however,  are heavily  settled areas,  including the densely
 Populated  environs  of Khulna.   It may be  presumed that the Sundarban  forest
 Provides  vital  protection for  these  settled   areas  by acting as  a  buffer
 against the force of storm  surges.   Loss of this buffer  could'greatly  increase
 the threat  of storm surges, and  the  forest  appears  to be vulnerable to  even a
 1-m rise in relative  sea  level.   Indeed,  near-term monitoring  for the killing
 effects  of heightened salinity may  be  warranted  at  the  Preserve's coastal
 margins.

     Agricultural  production represents  approximately  55%  of  the  nation's
 gross domestic  product,  and  it is  estimated that  over 857. of the  nation's
 Population  depends  on  agriculture  for  its  livelihood.    Major  crops  alone
 account  for about  40$ of  gross domestic  product.  Net cropped/agricultural
 areas (represented by horizontal hatching in Figure 8)  are obviously the major
 Use of land in Bangladesh.  We  estimate  that about 8.5% of the nation's agri-
 cultural output originates  in  the  area seaward  of  the  1-m  relative  sea level
 rise scenario,  this represents  about  11*  of  the  nation's  crops.   Estimated
 agricultural output originating  seaward of the 3-m scenario line totals 21* of
 the nation's agricultural  output, or about 21% of the nation's crops.

     A major  consideration  for  agricultural productivity is the intrusion  of
 salt water  into the nation's fresh  ground water  resources.   Current  estimates
 suggest  that saltwater intrusion now extends as  far  as  150 miles or  about  240
 «n inland  (Zaman  1983).   Assuming,  however,  that  the high  scenario  unfolds,
 the wedge  of saltwater could be  driven  another  240  km northward.   If  the
Bengal  rivers are effectively  dammed, it is  conceivable  that  nearly  the entire
nation  could be  affected by the  intrusion  of salt water.
                                     175

-------
                                                        BANGLADESH

                                               DIVISION, DISTRICT SUBDIVISION

                                               AND THANA BOUNDARIES
       Division Boundary


 — — — — District Boundary


       Subdivision Boundary

j

 ---- Thana Boundary


  DACCA Capito



KHULNA  Division Headquarters


RANGPUR Dl»trlct Headquarters
              &R j
                                              O BHALUKA Subdivision or Thana Headquarters


                                               ,  --- International Boundary
           t   \  """  ' ""•""
        ' J°~\"*~  'O -A. 'j

        ««  r^-a-r11^ Bj£5
          -'™>~


Figure  6.   One-meter  and  Three-meter  Transgression Scenarios  for  Relative

             Sea  Level  Rise in  the  Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna  River  Delta
                                           176

-------
       88-E
                    89*
                                90'
                                            91'
                                                        95 E
                                           BANGLADESH
                                DISTRIBUTION  OF  POPULATION
                                              1971*
                                          70   «0   tO   SO   00
                                                                18"
                                    Eoch dot represents 2,000 p*rjon$
liSiflliSMSfesv
        21'N
        88'E
                                                               2TN
                   B9
           Figure 1.   Distribution of Population  in  Bangladesh
                     Source:  Ahmad  1976
1971  Distribution used for graphical  presentation only.   Projected  1985
population  by district used in scenario  estimates reported in  text.
                                  177

-------
                                            92'E
                                BANGLADESH
                          LAND UTILIZATION
                               (BY DISTRCTS)
                                         NET CHOPPED AREA
                     CULTIVABLE WASTE
                      CURRENT FALLOW
           BAY OF
           BENGAL
Figure 8.  Land Utilization  in Bangladesh
           Source:  Ahmad  1976
                     178

-------
     It  will  be  difficult  to replace  the croplands  lost  to sea  level rise
because  the  countryside is  already  so  extensively  cultivated.   Of  the 24.5
million  acres  in the  nation estimated  to be cultivable,  approximately 22.5
million  acres,  or more than  90$,  are  already  in cultivation  (Zaman   1983).
Currently fallow  areas  (Figure 8) constitute a negligible  percentage of land
utilization.  Further prospects  for  increasing  agricultural usage in northern
districts (the only area possibly unaffected by salt water intrusion) are also
a relatively small proportion  of the  total (Figure 8).  Increasing the  inten-
sity of agricultural land utilization through multiple cropping strategies may
show  some promise  as  a response  to  loss  of agricultural lands.   Of  the
nation's net cropped  area,  over half is currently used  for only one crop per
year, while 39$  is used for  two  crops annually  and about 1% is fully utilized
in  the  production of   three  crops  (Quarterly  Economic  Review  of  Bangladesh
1985).   However,  much of the land in  the delta least likely to be affected by
coastal  transgression is in  relative  topographic highs  produced  by old  delta
sediments of distinctly  poor  fertility  and is less productive for agriculture
than the extensive new delta most likely to be flooded.

     These differences  in agricultural productivity can be discerned in Figure
9, which  shows  that  areas  with  relatively poor rice  production, northwest of
Dhaka and along the northwestern boundaries  with India, are  the old deltaic
soils of low agricultural value.  Rice  accounts for  90$ of the nation's total
grain output, 73$ of the nation's cropped  area,  and  28$ of the nation's gross
domestic product.   It  is the vital  food  staple  for  the nation's population.
As  seen  in Figure  9,   a significant  portion of  the  nation's rice producing
areas would  be  lost from a  low rise,  an  even  more  would be lost  with  a 3-m
rise.

     The other  vital crop in the nation's  agricultural output is jute (Figure
10).   Jute  and  jute  products   represent  some  55$  of  the nation's  export
revenues and approximately 50$ of agricultural  earnings.  Approximately  2-2.5
million acres are devoted to jute production,  representing 11$ of the nation's
total  agricultural  area.    Although  only about  0.8$ of  the  nation's jute
production originates in the area seaward of the shoreline  for  a 1-m rise,  a
3-m rise would affect nearly  16$ of the production, which would be close to 9$
of the nation's current export revenues.

     The  loss  of land  would also affect  fishing.   Although  fish  production
only  accounts  for about 5$  of  GDP,  it represents  an  estimated 80$ of the
nation's total  production of animal protein.   About  1.5 million  people depend
on  fishing  activities  for  their livelihood.   The  nation  annually  produces
about  700,000   tons  of  fish, 80$  of  which are freshwater  species.    Fish
products are the nation's fourth leading export commodity after jute products,
jute, and leather,  exceeding even exports of tea.  We  estimate  that 7.5$ of
the  nation's major  fishing  centers  are  in  the area  affected  by the  1-m
relative sea level  rise.  Forty-one  percent of  the  nation's  fishing centers
are within the  area  affected by  the  3-m scenario.   It seems likely,  however,
that  fishing centers  are subject to  considerable relocation and the fishing
industry, in part due  to its largely artisan nature,  may be in  a position to
respond  with great  flexibility over  the coming century  to  changing configur-
ations and conditions  in the distribution of the nation's  aquatic resources.
More  drastic  would be  the   combined  effect  of decreased  river   flow and sea
level rise.   In   the Nile Delta, the offshore sardine industry ceased
                                      179

-------
                                                            BANGLADESH
                                                          AMAN  RICE
                                                   Each dot rvpr*Mnt» 2,000 oort*
        BANGLADESH
           RICE
Each dot r«pr»s»nt» 2,000 aero
Figure 9.   Rice and Araan  Rice Production in Bangladesh
            Source:  Ahmad 1976
                             180

-------
                                              92'E
                                        X IT
                                        JUTE
  -    ••*•*..!'     „'*
26'N  '."*'•• •*• *t • *l •*•'."'•''• 7*C/
22'
                                             «2*E
    Figure  10.  Jute Production  in Bangladesh
                 Source:  Er-Rashid 1977
                          181

-------
within  a  few  years  after  the  fertile  Nile  waters  stopped  entering  the
Mediterranean.  Similarly, since  the  construction  of the Kotri barrage on the
Indus  River,  fish  catch  per  fishing boat  in coastal  waters has  fallen by
nearly 75% (Quraishee 1985).

     Large  industries  in Bangladesh  are  portrayed  in  Figure 11.    Many are
associated with jute products,  and as with the case of jute production, we see
that only a relatively minor proportion  is found within the area likely to be
affected by a 1-m relative sea level increase.  However, a significant portion
of  the  nation's industrial  activity  appears  to  be situated  within the area
affected by the 3-m rise.

     The current economic activities originating in potentially affected areas
within  Bangladesh   are  summarized  in disaggregated  form  in Table 2.    For
purposes of this disaggregation,  we assume conservatively and for  the sake of
simplicity that, except for  the  Sundarban and Chittagong forests,  agriculture
is  uniformly  distributed  over  the  nation's entire  land area.  About 11% of
agricultural  GDP  is  thus  contained  within  the  area  affected  by  the  low
scenario  and   about 27.5$  within  the  area  affected  in  the  3-m  scenario.
Economic  data  indicate  that  approximately  1.5$  of  the  nation's   industrial
activity originates within the area likely to be affected by a 1-m  rise, with
5.5% of  industrial production  originating  within  the area  affected by  a 3-ro
case.   We  assume  that  transport,  storage,  and  communications;   trade  and
services; banking  and  insurance; and  professional and miscellaneous services
are distributed  in the  same  way  as industry.   In  a similar manner,  we assume
that  construction   activities;  power,   water,  and  sanitation;  housing;  and
public administration and defense are distributed as population, whose distri-
bution we know  from other sources (Central Agency  for Public Mobilization and
Statistics  1982).   Thus,  between  9$ and  10$ of those  activities  currently
originate within the area that would be  affected  if  the sea rises   1 m,  while
nearly 28$ originate within the area that would be threatened by a 3-m rise in
relative sea  level.  Altogether,  some 8$ of the nation's current GDP is esti-
mated  to  originate within the  area that  could  be lost in  the  1-m  scenario,
while about 20$ originates in the area to be threatened by 3-m rise.

     As shown  in Figure  12,  there may be  some reason  to fear that  a 3-m rise
in  relative  sea  level   would threaten  more  areas  than  portrayed  in  our
scenario.  Notice  that  a  large area  surrounding the  upper reaches  of the 3-ro
contour along the  Meghna  River already is subject  to severe flooding.  If the
high scenario unfolds,  flooding  might  intensify  in  these  regions.   Similar
additional  effects  might be   expected   in  the   moderately   flooded  regions
surrounding the  Padma River  and  the confluence  of the Ganges and Brahmaputra
Rivers  north  of  the   central  portion   of  our   3-m  contour  and  extending
northwesterly and southwesterly into currently highly flooded areas.

     We  emphasize   again  the  massive delivery  of sediments  to the  Ganges-
Brahmaputra-Meghna Delta by these rivers.  The sediment currently delivered to
the  mouth of  the  delta  appears to  be  maintaining a  near equilibrium,  a
balanced state with the forces of tectonic and deltaic subsidence,  to maintain
a  nearly static  situation   with  little  noticeable  deltaic  progradation and
little noticeable  net erosion.   Any  significant reduction in the  delivery of
these sediments  to  the delta,  however,  could  disrupt this balance  and expose
the delta to  the same kinds of erosion that have been witnessed in the Nile.
                                      182

-------
                                                   61-               92'E
                                                  BANGLADESH
                                               DISTRIBUTION
                                                      OF
                                           LARGE INDUSTRIES
                                                     1974
                                               10   «p    to    «p    90
                   V T«« Girdcnt* Factor!** A Ch*mic*l»
Jut* Mill
  <* Pr«»
Cotton Tcitll*
Silk Fictory
Sugar Mill
Flour Mill
OI.IMUry
Tobacco Fictory
  F«rt!lli»r Factory
  Rubb*r Ficlory
  Pip.fMill
  Match Factory
4 Hydroilcctrlc Plant
  S(«el Mill
  Q*n*nl Engineering
Q| Dockyard
  C«ment Ficlory
  Glali Fictory
  Oil R«lln»ry
  L*lth«r Fictory
                                     •  Induttrlal Centra*
21'N
    Figure 11.    Distribution of Large Industries  in Bangladesh
                    Source:   Ahmad  1976
                                         183

-------
Table 2.  Economic  Activity  and Population Originating  in   Affected   Region:
          Bangladesh (1984-85)
Activity* One-Meter Scenario
Agriculture
Industry
Construction
Power, Water, and Sanitation
Transportation, Storage, and
Communications
Trade Services
Housing 2,735
Public Administration and Defense
Banking and Insurance
Professional and
Miscellaneous Services
GDP in Affected Region
Total GDP
Percent of GDP
20,685
590
1,750
235
400
510
7,895
1,680
95
445
29,125
390,015
8
Three-Meter Scenario
51,450
21,615
5,065
670
1,470
1,870

4,860
355
1,635
775,435
390,015
20
"Values in millions of Takas (TK) in 1984/85.  ($1 U.S. = TK 25.35 in  1984)

Total Estimated Population (1985)       92.8 million           92.8 million

Estimated Population in
  Affected Region                        8.5 million           24.8 million

Percent Population in
Affected Region                          9                     27
                                      184

-------
                                          BANGLADESH
                              FLOODING  AND DRAINAGE
                                              MLF>
                              Mostly above flood or fair
                                                    Land under conilint tidal
                                                    action
                          iii Gravity drainage possible
                              Highly flooded
                              Moderately flooded
Pump drainage possible
Large scale tubewells (In use)
Improvement possible
                                                     by low embankment!
                                            Coastal embankment*: Existing*
                                            under construction
                   #  C H  6 A L
Figure  12.   Flooding  and Drainage  in  Bangladesh
               Source:   Ahmad  1976
                             185

-------
Careful attention  to  this  possibility  seems  warranted  in  the  planning and
design of upstream water management projects such as dams and barrages.

     Assuring such  careful  attention,  however, is  greatly  complicated by the
sensitive international nature  of the  problem.   Bangladesh  shares the Ganges
Basin with two of its neighboring states, India and Nepal, and the Brahmaputra
Basin  with  India,  China,  and  Bhutan.   Of the  total  drainage  area  of the
Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna  River  system,  only  7.5%  lies  within  Bangladesh
(Zaman  1983).   Already, a  serious dispute  between Bangladesh and  India has
arisen  over  India's  construction and use  of  the  barrage  on  the  Ganges  at
Farakka.  This  dispute  led  in  1972  to  the creation of the Indo-Bangladesh
Joint  Rivers  Commission  and   in   1977  to  the  Ganges  Waters  Agreement.
Nonetheless,  tensions continue  over this issue,  and it seems very likely that
future  difficulties  can  be  expected  in allocation  and management  of the
aquatic and sediment resources of these complex international river systems.

SUMMARY

     In Egypt,  about  12$-15$  of the  nation's arable area falls  within the
region threatened by a one meter  rise  and some 20% falls within the area that
could erode with a  three meter  rise.   (These represent approximately 0.5$ and
0.8$,  respectively,  of Egypt's total  land  area.)   We  estimate   that  15%  of
current GDP originates within the area affected in  the 1-m scenario, with 20%
of current GDP originating in the area affected in the 3-m scenario.

     Approximately 11.5$ and 27$ of the land in Bangladesh would be threatened
by rises in sea level of one and three meters,  respectively.   We estimate that
8.5 and 25 million  people  (9$  and 27$ of the  total population)  reside within
these areas.   Given our assumptions, 8$  to 20$ of the nation's gross domestic
product currently originates in these areas.

     Approximately 12$ to 15$ of  Egypt's arable land (0.5$ of the total area)
could  be  lost  if  the sea  rises one  meter,  while  a  three meter  rise would
threaten 20$  of the arable  land  (0.8$ of  the  total area).   These areas are
currently home  to 7.7 and  over  10 million  people (16$ and  21$).   We estimate
that 15$ and  20$ of the nations's GDP originates  in these areas.

     In view  of the substantial  human and economic stakes  involved in these
two sea level rise  scenarios  for  Bangladesh and Egypt, we believe it is clear
that private and public agencies  should  begin  to include consideration of the
possible effects of  sea  level rise over  the next century in their long-range
planning  and  project  development.     The  types  of  activities  that  seem
threatened soonest  by the sea  level  rise are  subsistence agriculture, storm
protection, and urban activities.  There seems little  doubt that  major public
works have already  increased  the  vulnerability of areas in Egypt  to sea level
rise, and major public works such as upstream dams and barrages in Bangladesh,
or  in  its co-basin  states,   have the potential  for  greatly  increasing  that
nation's vulnerability to sea level  rise.   Indeed,  as can  be  seen from Table
3,  substantial  differences  exists  in Bangladesh in  the  economic activities
originating within  the areas affected by the  1-m and  3-m relative sea level
rise scenarios.
                                      186

-------
         Table 3.  Summary of  Activities Originating  in Affected Areas


 Account (1985 Value)One-Meter ScenarioThree-Meter Scenario
Percent of Land Area
Bangladesh 11.5
Egypt (3.5/5 settled) 12-15
Percent of Population
Bangladesh 9
Egypt 16
27.5
29

27
21
Polpulation (Millions)
Bangladesh (92.8) 8.5
Egypt (48.6) 7.7
24.8
10.1
Percent of Gross Domestic Product
Bangladesh 8
Egypt 15
20
20
Gross Domestic Product (Millions)
Bangladesh (390,015 Taka) 21,125
Egypt (29,872 Pounds) 4,441
77,435
6,053
     There  is an  obvious need  for refined  estimates  based on  better,  more
disaggregated  data  about  land-use  patterns,   population  distribution,  and
distribution  of  economic  production.   Official  projections  of these variables
would also allowt  projection  of  economic exposure to account for economic and
population  growth, assuming  no  sea  level  rise,  for  comparison with  trans-
gression scenarios.  Equally  important,  particularly in  view of the fact that
in both  deltaic  areas the  rate  of subsidence will  probably  affect local sea
level rise  more  than global  rise  over the next  60  years,  is documenting the
fluvial  and  coastal environment.   In Egypt  it  is  too  late,  the  Nile being
completely dammed.  But in the case of Bangladesh, we need to document how the
river flows,  how the sediment is  carried in the lower  reaches  of  the  delta,
and where  the sediment  ultimately accumulates.    If rivers can be  dammed  or
diverted in ways that minimize adverse impacts  on sedimentation,  then coastal
inundation and erosion might be minimized.

     Similar  scenarios can  be constructed  for  other developing nations.   Of
the three factors  controlling these scenarios, nothing can  be done  to control
local subsidence.  Nations, however, can have some  effect in helping regulate


                                      187

-------
both locally and internationally  the  emissions  to the atmosphere that lead to
the greenhouse effect.  More  importantly,  each  nation has substantial control
over the managing and damming of its  rivers, although extended and difficult
international negotiations  may be necessary.   With  proper  measures,  coastal
erosion  may  be  minimized  to  reduce  the  human acceleration  of  shoreline
retreat.  Further,  recognizing the threats of socioeconomic dislocations posed
by sea level rise, nations  likely to  be affected can begin to plan for such a
rise by taking appropriate actions.

     In spite of the simplifications necessitated by a first-order assessment,
it  seems  indisputable  that  when added to  the  expected subsidence  of fifty
centimeters through  2100,  even a 50-cm rise in global sea level implied by our
low  scenario would   have  serious  implications   for  Bangladesh  and  Egypt.
However,  it  seems   reasonable  to  conclude  that   if  the  sediment  washing
continues  to reach   the  delta,  the   impacts  on  Bangladesh  can  be  reduced
substantially, although it would be far more difficult to do so in the case of
Egypt.   Neither maintaining natural deltaic  processes nor slowing  the rise in
sea level due to  the greenhouse effect would be  easy,  but  for Bangladesh and
Egypt,  even the most  modest success in that  direction would be well worth the
effort in terms  of both economics and  human lives.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

     This research was supported  by a Cooperative Research  Agreement with the
U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency,  No.  CR-812941-01-0, and  with funds from
The Pew Trusts  to the Marine Policy  Center  and  the  A.W.  Mellon Foundation to
the Coastal Research Center of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.


REFERENCES

Ahmad,  N.  1976.   A  new  economic geography  of  Bangladesh.   Bombay:   Vikas
     Publishing  House PVT Ltd.

Barth,  M.C.  and J.G.  Titus,   eds.    1984.   Greenhouse  effect and  sea level
     rise.   New  York:  Van Nostrand Reinhold.

Bird, E.C.F.   1985.   Coastline changes:   a  global review.   Chicester:   John
     Wiley and Sons.

Bird, E.C.F., and M.L., Schwartz, eds.  1985. The world's coastline.   Strouds-
     burg:   Van  Nostrand Reinhold.

Central Agency  for  Public Mobilization and  Statistics,  Egypt.   1982  October
     13, 1982.

Er-Rashid,   H.    1977.    Geography  of  Bangladesh.  Dhaka;  University  Presg.
     Boulder:  Westview Press.

Hoffman, J.S., D. Keyes,  and  J.G., Titus.   1983.   Projecting future sea level
     rise.    Methodology,  estimates  to  the  year  2100  and  research  needs.
     Washington, D.C.:  U.S. Government Printing Office.
                                      188

-------
Inman,  D.L.,  D.G.  Aubrey, and  S.S.,  Pawka.   1976.   Application of nearshore
     processes  to  the Nile Delta.   In UNDP/UNESCO  Proceedings  of seminar on
     Nile Delta sedimentology. 205-55.

Jansen,  E.G.    1983.    Rural  Bangladesh  -  competition for  scarce resourcesT
     DERAP Publication No. 162.  Bergen, Norway:Chr. Michelsen Institute.

Khafagy,  A.  and M.  Manohar.    1979.   Coastal  protection of  the  Nile Delta.
     Nature and Resources 15:7-13.

Milliman, J.D.   1985.   Changing sediment  influxes from rivers to the ocean; A
     real and  future  problem  for Indian Ocean  nations.   IUC/UNESCO Press, in
     press.

Milliman, J.D.  1986.  Tropical river discharge and rising sea level;  present
     and   future   impacts  from   man's  activities.      IOC/UNESCO  Special
     Publication, in press.

Milliman, J.D., and R.H.  Meade.   1983.   World-wide delivery of river sediment
     to the oceans.  Journal of Geology 91(1):1-21.

Quarterly  economic  review  of  Bangladesh.    (Annual  Supplement  for  1985).
     London:  The Economist Publications Ltd.

Quarterly economic review of Egypt (Annual Supplement for 1985).   London:  The
     Economist Publications Ltd.

Quraishee, G.S.   1985.   Influence  of the Indus  River  on  the marine environ-
     ment.   In Proceedings  of  the  International Conference  on  Management of
     Environment 111-22.  Pakistan: Pakistan Academy of Science.  Islamabad.

United  Nations Economic  and  Social Commission  for  Asia  and  the  Pacific.
     1981.    Country  Monograph  Series.  No.   8,  Population  of  Bangladesh.
     Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCO

Warrick,  R.A.   and  W.E.  Riebsame.    1983.    Social  response to  C02-induced
     climate change:  opportunities for research.   In Social science research
     and climate  change;   an  interdisciplinary approach,  eds.  R.S.  Chen,  E.
     Boulder, and S.M. Schneider.  Boston:  D. Reidel.

World Bank.   1972.   Bangladesh land and water resources.   Washington,  D.C.:
     World Bank.

Zaman,  M.,  ed.    1983.   River basin  development.    In  Proceedings of  the
     National Symposium on River  Basin  Development.   Dublin:  Tycooly Inter-
     national.
                                      189

-------
Sea Level Rise:  The  Reaction of a  Coastal Realtor

Kenneth J. Smith
New Jersey Shore and Beach
Manahawken, New Jersey USA
     I appreciate the opportunity  to present  my  reaction  to  the  issue of  sea
level rise.   I  am  a coastal realtor  from  New  Jersey,  and I grew  up  on a
barrier   island  just  north of  Atlantic City  called  Long Beach  Island.   I
purchased my  current  home a couple  of years ago,  and  after  reviewing  the
preceding papers I  am proud of the  foresight  I must have had to have  chosen a
site about  10 kilometers  (6 miles)  inland and 20 meters  (80 feet) above  sea
level.

     Although this  report  has an international focus I  mention  the  New Jersey
coast very briefly,  because  it  is  a microcosm of developed  coasts  worldwide.
Many  of  the  challenges  and  problems  of developed shorelines  are  evident
here.  We  have  everything from  bustling  deepwater  ports  to  low-lying,  fully
habited  barrier  islands, and an extensive  tidal marsh system.

     About 25 percent  of  the U.S.  population  lives  within  a 480-kilometer
(300-mile)  radius of  Atlantic City,  and  one  gets  the  feeling  in the summer
that they are all at the  Jersey shore.   In the  summer we are  crowded beyond
belief,  and our  access roads are  backed up for miles.  Our  200 kilometers (125
miles) of beach  are  almost 100 percent developed,.with  real  estate worth many
billions of dollars.-^To give you an idea  of our  values, an oceanfront lot, if
you can  find one, averages about  half a million dollars, and  oceanfront houses
rent for about two thousand dollars  per week.

     What this tells me is that people love the shore and have no  qualms about
paying to  be  near  it.   The  location  of  New Jersey's  beaches,  Just  a short
drive from the  New York and  Philadelphia  urban  areas, has predetermined our
role as  a provider to tourism.   If millions of people converge on  our beaches,
they need the development  that  facilitates their enjoyment of  those beaches.
A place  to sleep, take a shower,  restaurants, amusement  parks, marinas—all of
these combine to enhance a summer vacation.  In my view the development is as
valuable to recreation as the  beaches and  bays.
                                    191

-------
     It  is  a  paradox that, given the  economic  and recreational benefits of a
developed coast,  we  always seem to have  insufficient  funds for shore protec-
tion—not just in Mew Jersey, but nationwide, and I suspect in other countries
as well.  This lack of funds is based partially on budget constraints at every
level  of government;  yet,  even when we  can  show   tremendous  benefit-cost
ratios, the funds to protect our coasts are difficult to find.

     What does this  have to do with sea  level  rise?   Quite a bit.   There are
two main philosophies of  coastal  management  which I  will  call  the  "stabi-
lizationists" and the "naturalists."

     The "stabilizationists" include the  "can do"  people:   the Corps of Engi-
neers,  coastal engineering firms,  property owners, local  officials,  and most
tourists.   I  include myself  in this  group.   We believe  that  the technology
exists  to maintain most  beaches in their present  positions,  not forever,  but
for many years to come,  and that the  value  of  the existing development, both
economic and recreational,  justifies spending the money to do it.

     The "naturalists"  or  "back  to nature"  proponents insist,  with  varying
degrees  of  intensity,  that because  there is nothing we can  ultimately  do to
stop the ocean,  we should  begin  the depopulation of  our  barrier islands  and
the abandonment of our coast.  They exhibit, at best,  a cavalier attitude and,
at worst, an arrogant disdain toward coastal property owners, and have managed
to obstruct meaningful shore protection projects in every locality.

     Unfortunately, many of the "naturalists" are government officials who are
responsible for shore protection.   So when  the  issue  of sea level rise began
to emerge,  it was "right  up  their  alley."   Although  the  predicted  sea level
rise has a  large range  of uncertainty,  you can  bet  that   in  the future this
issue  will  become a cornerstone  of  their  argument  against  funding  shore-
protection projects.

     The reaction of our local residents,  officials, and realtors to projected
sea level rise ranges  from a healthy  skepticism  to a  rather macho detachment
from the  subject.   I  have heard comments  such as, "What  do you care?   You
won't be around to see it!"  The scientific community is often dismissed as "a
bunch of eggheads who don't want us here anyway." I wince when I hear comments
like that,  but I  suspect sea level rise  will be  taken more seriously  as more
evidence comes in.

     The disdain  of  the  ordinary coastal citizen  is understandable,  however,
since  most  of  the  discussion of  sea  level   rise  seems  to  come  from  the
"naturalist" camp.   Many theories  have been used  to justify the condemnation
or confiscation of coastal  property, so sea  level  rise is  seen by many people
as just another empty theory.

     I do not feel that way;  I believe the problem is  serious.  What concerns
me is the rapidity of the  increase  of  carbon dioxide and the other gases.   It
appears  that we are  racing into a climate that  is unknown  to man.   The solu-
tions,  if there  are  any,  should  begin to be contemplated  now, as part of a
concerted,  global effort.
                                      192

-------
      Even  a mid-range sea level  rise  scenario will have a profound effect  on
our  coastline  throughout  the  world.   The  resulting retreat  of  our  beaches
would severely  threaten  and  possibly  wipe out  our barrier  island develop-
ment.   The flooding of our ports, the salt contamination of our aquifers, the
drowning  of our  marshes—all of these possibilities need   to  be taken very
seriously.

      People  of  the  "can   do"  persuasion  have  relied on the  technologies  of
beach nourishment and hard structures to protect our  coastal development.  But
the  coastal  zone  is  dynamic,  and  it  is  difficult  to  include  long-term
certainty  in our planning.   Plans to abandon our property or retreat from our
coast at  this  point  would surely produce  such enormous litigation as to  be
counterproductive.  For the near  future, I can only hope that the rise will  be
perceptible  enough  to be  seriously  considered, and  slow enough  that  we can
prepare for it.

      Is there a  point where  a global  constituency  will say  "enough" and begin
to reduce  the  emissions  that  produce  this  climatic change?   I  don't know.
This earth sometimes seems like a cancer  patient who can't  stop smoking.  But
it is a beautiful world,  and  we  are  its  stewards.   Certainly,  the  future  is
what  we make it, and I hope  that we will see  increased  funding  for climatic
research.    I  congratulate UNEP,  EPA, and  all  of the other authors  for their
focus on this important issue.
                                     193

-------