EPA R2 72 054
October 1972             Environmental Protection Technology Series
    RUNOFF  OF OILS
    FROM RURAL ROADS
    TREATED TO SUPPRESS DUST
                               Office of Research and Monitoring
                               National Environmental Research Center
                               U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                               Cincinnati, Ohio 45268

-------
            RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of  the  Office  of  Research  and
Monitoring,  Environmental  Protection Agency, have
been grouped into  five  series.   These  five  broad
categories  were established to facilitate further
development  and   application   of   environmental
technology.   Elimination  of traditional grouping
was  consciously   planned  to  foster   technology
transfer   and  a  maximum   interface  in  related
fields.  The five  series are:

   1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
   2.  Environmental Protection Technology
   3.  Ecological  Research
   4.  Environmental Monitoring
   5,  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION   TECHNOLOGY   series.    This   series
describes   research   performed  to  develop  and
demonstrate   instrumentation,    equipment    and
methodology  to  repair  or  prevent environmental
degradation from point  and   non-point  sources  of
pollution.  This work provides the new or improved
technology  required for the control and treatment
of pollution sources to meet environmental quality
standards.
         For Ml* by the Superintendent of Document!, U.S. Government Printing Office
                   Washington, D.C. 20402- Price »1
                    Stock Number 6601-00462

-------
                               EPA-R2-72-054
                                October 1972
     RUNOFF OF OILS FROM RURAL ROADS

        TREATED TO SUPPRESS DUST
           Frank J. Freestone

Edison Water Quality Research Laboratory
        Edison, New Jersey 08817
         Program Element 1B2041
 National Environmental Research Center
   Office of Research and Monitoring
  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
         Cincinnati, Ohio 45268

-------
                             ABSTRACT

Two rural roads in Readington Township, Hunterdon County, New Jersey,
which are treated with waste crankcase oils, were examined to deter-
mine whether or not the oil leaves the road.  Analyses indicated that
roughly one percent of the total oil estimated to have been applied
remains in the top inch of road surface material, that oil penetration
below the top inch of road was minimal, and that lead was concentrated
(~ 200 mg/kg) in the top inch of road material.

Laboratory weathering experiments indicate an estimated maximum weath-
ering loss of oil from a road would be approximately 18%.  Rain runoff
studies on simulated rural road surfaces indicated two mechanisms by
which oil is transported from the road:  leaching of the oil by flota-
tion, and flotation of oil-wet soil particles.  The greatest oil trans-
port is during the first few rains after oil application with continuous,
low level leaching during each subsequent rain.

Analysis of soil samples taken from a field subjected to runoff from an
oiled road showed significantly higher lead content than soil taken
from a field 150 feet from the road.

Five photographs, clearly showing oil leaching from the test road sur-
face and entering drainage ditches after a rain, are presented.
                                iii

-------
                           CONTENTS

Section

   I      Conclusions                                       1

  II      Recommendations                                   3

 III      Introduction                                      5

  IV      Experimental                                      7

          1.   Oiling History                                7
          2.   Oil Type and Application Rate                 7
          3.   Oil in the Road Surface:  Concentration        7
              vs. Depth
          4.   Estimate of Oil Remaining in Test  Road         8
          5.   Oil Volatility                               10
          6.   Runoff Mechanisms                            10
          7.   Biodegradation                               15
          8.   Adhesion to Vehicles and Dust Transport       15
          9.   Analysis of Trace Quantities of  Crank-        15
              case Oil in Runoff Waters
         10.   Lead in Soils and Plants                     15
         11.   Biological Assessment  of Lead in Test         16
              Aquatic Organisms
         12.   Estimate of Lead Remaining in Test Road       19
         13.   Sampling Procedures                          21
         14.   Analysis Techniques                          22

   V     Discussion                                        23

   VI    References                                        25
                               v

-------
                      FIGURES

                                                        Page

1     Test Locations                                     26

2     Woodschurch Road Showing Oil  on Wet Road Surface    27

3     Blue Oil Patch Squeezed  from  Soft, Wet Road         27
      Surface Material

4     Oil on Puddle Surface                              28

5     Oil Movement with Water  Runoff                      28

6     Oil on Drainage Ditch at the  Side of  the Road       29
                         vi

-------
                                 TABLES






No.                                                          Page




 1      Penetration of Oil Into Road Surface                    9




 2      Weathering Data                                       11




 3      Rainfall Data, Flemington,  New Jersey                  12




 4      Laboratory Runoff Study                               14




 5      Typical Composition of Waste Crankcase  Oils            17




 6      Lead Analysis Results                                 18




 7      Analysis of Aquatic Organisms for  Lead                 20
                                  vii

-------
                       ACKNOWLEDGEMENT S

The author wishes to extend his gratitude to the following Edison
Water Quality Research Laboratory personnel for their special co-
operation and contributions toward this study:  J. Stephen Dorrler,
Chief, Oil Spills Branch, for his direction and suggestions;
Stephen Schoonmaker, for his field sampling and laboratory sample
preparation efforts; Michael Gruenfeld for his laboratory analyses;
Thomas Roush for his biological sampling and analyses; and Ann Krypel
for her patient typing efforts.

The cooperation of Howard Oldenburg, Mayor, Harry W. Haver, Clerk
and the Township Committee of Readington Township, New Jersey is
also gratefully acknowledged.
                                viii

-------
                             SECTION I

                            CONCLUSIONS

 1.   Roughly 1% of the total oil conservatively estimated to have been
 applied to the test roads  remains  in the top  inch  of road surface.
 Penetration of oil below this  top  inch  is minimal.

 2.   Oil leaves the road  during wet weather by flotation  from wet road
 surface material  and by  flotation  of oil-wet  road  surface particles.

 3.   Lead,  which is contained in the waste crankcase  oil,  also leaves
 the  road surface  with runoff.

 4.   The road surface contains  a considerable  amount  (=* 200 mg/kg aver-
 age) of lead,  which,  if  associated with  dust  particles on the road,
 could be carried  by  winds  to contaminate fields and  crops  adjacent to
 the  oiled  road.   This  could be  a problem where road  side  crops are for
 direct  human consumption,  such  as  lettuce, cabbage,  etc., and/or where
 lead from  the  oiled  road adds  to the  lead  fallout on these crops from
 vehicular  traffic.

 5.  Precise quantitation of oil  movements was beyond the scope of this
 study;  only estimates  of major oil movements were made.  The estimates
 apply most specifically to the roads  tested, and will vary somewhat
with other roads  and oiling conditions.   Therefore,  extrapolation of
 these data to other  roads must be made with care.

-------
                           SECTION II

                         RECOMMENDATIONS

1.  Further study to determine the quantity of waste oils that actually
leave the roads should not be undertaken at this time.  The fact that
the oil leaves the road is clear; precise quantitation is not easily
achieved.

2.  Further study should be undertaken to determine the ecological
consequences of runoff oil and its accompanying heavy metals, includ-
ing lead.

3.  If preliminary evidence from the study of (2) above indicates
ecological harm, then studies should be undertaken to define economi-
cally attractive alternatives to the application of waste oils for
dust control,  and means for implementation of the alternatives.

-------
                           SECTION III

                           INTRODUCTION

An  estimated  200 million gallons of waste crankcase oils and an unknown
quantity of other waste oils, are applied yearly to rural roads in this
country for the purpose of dust control.1  The waste crankcase oil con-
tains  approximately 1% by weight of lead compounds which amounts to
14.0 million  pounds of lead applied yearly to roads.

In  Readington Township, Hunterdon County, New Jersey, dirt roads are
oiled  twice yearly, in June and August to suppress dust in front of
houses along  the roads.  Two of the roads in Readington Township were
examined to determine if the waste oils were leaving the road surfaces.
The problem was approached by attempting a mass balance to determine
the amount of oil applied to the road surface, the amount remaining in
the road surface, and the amounts leaving the surface by various mech-
anisms.  Additionally, analyses were made to determine if the lead
component of  the oil was also leaving the road.

The top inch  of road surface material extending the width of the road
between drainage ditches was considered the object of the mass balance.
Oil could leave the road surface by several mechanisms:  volatilization,
runoff mechanisms, adhesion to vehicles passing (with possible redepo-
sition at other areas), adhesion to dust particles with wind transport
from the road surface, or penetration into the road material below the
surface, possibly through capillary action.  Additionally, the oil re-
maining in the road surface could be biodegraded.

Some of the variables affecting the above movements are oil application
history, frequency, quantity per application; oil type, source, vis-
cosity, density, volatility, presence of surface active agents; road
conditions: crown, slope, compaction, density and porosity of soil,
soil grain size distribution; traffic conditions on the road; weather
conditions: time to the first rain after oil application, total yearly
rainfall, temperature affecting volatility of oil, wind affecting dust
transport; and factors affecting biodegradation: presence of oil-
consuming microorganisms, road surface moisture content and presence
of  nitrogen and phosphorous nutrients.

With such a range of variables and oil movement mechanisms, precise
quantitation  of oil movement applicable to numerous roads is beyond
the scope of  this study.   However, with information available, esti-
mates may be made of some of the more significant movements of oil.

-------
                           SECTION  IV

                         EXPERIMENTAL

 1.  Oiling History

    No records are available of the true oiling history of the test
    roads.  The Readington Township Clerk indicates that the roads
    have been oiled twice  yearly for at least 12 years.  The waste
    oil collector who has  done the oiling indicates the roads have
    been oiled by him for  16 years, since 1955, and by others before
    him for an unknown number of years.  Road oiling to lay dust is
    usually done in other  townships in response to complaints from
    persons living along the roads; thus during dry years the roads
    may be oiled twice, and in wet years once or not at all.  A
    conservative estimate  of the total number of oilings on the test
    roads is 24, considering 2 oilings per year for 12 years, with
    the understanding noted above.

 2.  Oil Type and Application Rate

    The oil type and application rate is highly variable.  Conversa-
    tions with the waste oil collector who oils the Readington roads
    indicates that he uses a mixture of #4, #5, or #6 fuel oil sludge
    obtained from tank cleaning operations, and waste crankcase oils
    collected from service stations in the Trenton, New Jersey area.
    The ratio of the mixture depends upon the availability of the fuel
    oil sludge, and ranges from 15 to 30% sludge, the balance being
    waste crankcase oils.

    A waste oil collector  from the Boston area who oils roads in New
    England and upstate New York indicates that he uses waste water-
    soluble cutting oils, waste crankcase oils, terminal waste oils
    (from the oil-water separator on a water effluent), and oils from
    tank cleaning operations.  The oil applied to a given road depends
    on the availability of oils at the time of the oiling and follows
    no particular pattern.

    Application rate is apparently related to the qualitative judgment
    of the operator of the truck doing the oiling,  and  ranges from
    0.025 - 0.05 gallon per square foot of road surface, with the 0.05
    figure being used on the test roads.

3.  Oil in the Road Surface;   Concentration vs. Depth

    The two test roads were sampled in four oiled locations and in two
    unoiled locations to determine concentration of hydrocarbons vs.
    depth.   In all oiled locations, the top inch of road surface showed

-------
 the greatest  concentration  of oil,  an average of  0.74% wt. with
 trace  quantities  of  oils  at lower depths  (which may be contamination
 attributable  to the  sampling technique) .  The road surface material
 was made  up predominately of clay,  with some sand.  No attempt was
 made to characterize the  material in more detail.  Complete sampling
 data is presented in Table  1.

 Estimate  of Oil Remaining in Test Road

 Oil Applied

     0.05  gal/ft.2  per application
     2  applications/yr x 12  yrs = 24 applications
     0.05  x 24 = 1.2  gal/ft2  total applied oil
     1.2 gal/ft2 x 9  ft2/yd2  = 10.8  gal/yd2
     Oil penetrates 1 inch;  consider unit of road surface to be
       1  yd3 and  be  of dimensions 1 yd wide, 36 yds long and
       1  inch deep
     10.8  gal/yd2  x 36 yd2/yd3 (for  depth of 1 inch) =
       388.8 gal/yd3  road surface

     Oil weight:

       Oil sp. gr.:   0.904
       Water weighs  8.337 Ib/gal
       Oil weighs 0.904 x 8.337 = 7.537 Ib/gal
    Weight of Oil Applied = 388.8     x 7.537


    For 12 yrs. of application = 2930.25 Ib oil/yd3 road surface
    For 20 yrs. of application = 4883.9  Ib oil/yd3 road surface

Oil Remaining in Road

    Wt of road surface:
       Avg. soil sp. gr. = 2.75
       2.75 x 62.4 lb/ft3 x 27 ft3 « 4,644 lb_
                               yd"3"         yd3

Oil in Road Surface:  Avg. concentration = 0.74% Wt.
    (neglecting wt. of water in soil)
    0.0074 ;" ™,    .     x 4,644 -"— —°^
           Ib road surface          yd  road surface
     Ib oil             ,  ,,,  Ib road surface
                              yd'
~,  ,._ Ib oil remaining
      yd  road surface
                           8

-------
               TABLE 1
PENETRATION OF OIL INTO ROAD SURFACE
Station Hole
1 1
2
3
4
5
6
2 1
Control
2
3
3 1
2

4 1
Control
Depth (Inches)
Surface
4
6
Surface
4
6
Surface
4
6
Surface
4
6
Surface
4
6
Surface
4
8
10
Surface
4
6
Surface
4
Surface
4
Surface
6
Surface
4
6
Surface
4
Surface
6
Hydrocarbons mg/kg
6,313.17
18.04
18.53
12,572.70
26.42
52.62
8,254.50
88.72
7.67
5,880.24
70.71
7.65
13,441.25
39.95
67.63
2,555.91
59.87
9.35
12.15
347.76
0
0
131.04
0
211.83
0
1,586.22
354.40
9,437.94
805.74
198.35
6,222.52
276.21
142.72
10.04

-------
    Percent of Oil Applied Which Remains
          O / O "7
        =  2Q3Q  x  100  =  1-17% assuming 12 yrs of oiling

          34 37
                 x  100  =  0.7% assuming 20 yrs of oiling
5.  Oil Volatility

    To estimate the level of volatility of waste oil applied to
    Readington Township roads , a laboratory weathering experiment was
    performed.  Waste oil obtained from the waste oil collector, and
    being of a "typical" composition of approximately 20%  #6 sludge
    and 80% waste crankcase oil was placed in shallow 11" x 14"
    laboratory pans under infrared lamps and in the draft of a fan.
    The surface temperature of the oil was held at 100°F for a dura-
    tion of 288 hours to achieve a high, though arbitary, weathering
    stress.  At the end of the weathering period, a 16 - 18% change
    in weight of oil was noted.

    Waste oil obtained from a local service station was weathered
    under the same conditions for a period of 360 hours and changed
    weight by 7 - 9%.  Exact weathering figures are presented in
    Table 2.

6.  Runoff Mechanisms

    To observe runoff mechanisms of oiled roads, a laboratory tank with
    two compartments was filled with compacted clay material and sand
    material, respectively in the two compartments.  No attempt was
    made to characterize the materials in the tank more precisely than
    "sand" and "clay".  The tank was so arranged that for each compart-
    ment, there was a "road surface" of dimensions 13" x 35" and 18"
    deep, with a false bottom in the tank arranged to divert any pene-
    trating fluids to a collection bottle below the tank.  The surface
    of the material in the tank was sloped such that runoff of waters
    and oils could be contained in a large bottle adjacent to the tank.

    Each "road surface" was roughened to simulate a lightly scarified
    condition as observed on the test roads.   Oil was applied to each
    tank compartment at a rate  of 0.05 gpsf .   The tank was then allowed
    to stand indoors for a period of three days.  "Rain" was applied,
    corresponding  to the June and July rainfall averages for the Flem-
    ington area,  (See Table 3)  on each of two days to the oiled sand
    and clay compartments.   "Rain" and oil were applied through appro-
    priate spray nozzels from pressurized containers.   It is recognized
    that application rates  of oils to sand roads may differ from those
                              10

-------
                        TABLE 2
Test No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Oil Type
1*
1*
1*
2**
2**
2**
(Applied to <
2**
                    WEATHERING DATA
                       Temperature °F  Time (hours)  Weight Loss
                            90

                           100

                           100

                           100

                           100

                           100

                           100
 72

360

360

288

288

354

354
 5.97

 9.05

 7.29

18.15

16.43

16.13

17.07
    (Applied to clay)
 * Local service station
** Waste oil collector
                         11

-------
                 TABLE 3




  RAINFALL DATA, FLEMINGTON, NEW JERSEY
1931 - 1960
1951 - 1960 Averages
Month
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
TOTAL
Average (in.) # Rains > 0.1 in. # Rains > 0.5 in.
3.32
2.78
3.99
3.80
4.01
3.80
4.52
5.02
3.59
3.32
3.74
3.42
6
7
8
9
6
6
6
7
5
6
7
6
2
2
4
3
3
2
3
3
2
3
3
3
45.31
                  12

-------
of clay roads and that rainfall averages for sandy soil areas may be
slightly different.  However, the intent of the experiment was
observation of mechanisms rather than quantification.  Oil was
again applied at the above rate and "rains" corresponding to the
August and September rainfalls were applied and collected.  Com-
plete data is presented in Table 4.

The principal observations derived from this experiment were:

     a.  The oil penetrated the clay to a depth of about
         1 mm below the scarified level.

     b.  Even though the surface was scarified, the oil
         ran off the clay during application and "puddled"
         in the lowest portion of the road surface.

     c.  Application of "rain" to the clay road washed
         oil from the puddled area and leached oil from
         the clay surface.  Additionally,  some oil-wet
         particles floated with the rain runoff and were
         carried from the road surface.

     d.  There was no penetration of oil or water  entirely
         through the clay column.

     e.  The oil penetrated the sand "road surface" to a
         depth of a few grain diameters,  and was evenly
         distributed over the sand  with  no puddling.

     f.   Application of "rain" caused  the  flotation of oil-
         wet sand particles,  which  were  then carried with
         the rain runoff  into the collection container.

     g.   Some leaching  of oil from  the sand was observed,
         however,  the predominant mechanism of  oil  trans-
         port from the  sand road  surface was by flotation
         of  oil-wet  sand  particles.

     h.  After application of  two simulated monthly  rain-
        falls  (June and  July), approximately 20% of  the
         total quantity of oil-wet  sand particles had  been
         transported by runoff from  the road surface.

     i.  Ten  liters  of  water penetrated the  18 inch deep
        column of sand.   The water  contained 12.2 ml  of
        hydrocarbon material.
                          13

-------
                             TABLE 4

                     LABORATORY RUNOFF STUDY

 Time     Oil Applied    "Rain" Applied               Runoff
(days)       (ml)               (1)              Sand             Clay
                                           Water   Oil     Water    Oil
                                            (1)     (ml)      (1)      (ml)

  0         600                -             -

  3

  4

  5         600

  6

  7
   Total water penetration  through  the  sand  column was  10.0  liters  of
   water  containing  12.2 ml  of hydrocarbons.  No penetration was
   observed  through  the clay column.
28.3
33.7
37.4
26.7
20.5
20.9
31.5
19.5
80.2
101.2
77.1
29.5
26.0
32.5
37.0
23.4
37.5
15.8
89.7
5.3
                              14

-------
  7.  Biodegradation

     The rate of biodegradation of the oils in the surface of the road
     material will depend principally upon the presence of hydrocarbon
     consuming microorganisms, the moisture content of the soil, the
     presence of the nutrient materials, nitrogen and phosphorous, and
     ambient temperature.  No attempt was made to estimate the amount of
     total applied oil which has been biodegraded in the road surface.
     It is our opinion that biodegradation will account for a small
     amount of the oil loss, in relation to other physical oil move-
     ment mechanisms such as violatilization and runoff.  It should
     be noted that the road surface moisture content is low when the
     oil is applied, and that when rain occurs physical mechanisms are
     predominate.

  8.  Adhesion to Vehicles and Dust Transport

     It is recognized that oil is transported along the test road by
     adhesion to tires and underbodies of passing vehicles, and rede-
     posited in some manner.  However, no satisfactory method has been
     defined to account for such transport.  Similarly, it is felt that
     some oil may adhere to dust particles and be transported by wind
     from the road surface (see below), but no quantitation of this
     mechanism was attempted.

  9.  Analysis of Trace Quantities of Crankcase Oil in Runoff Waters

     A stream which receives runoff waters from one of the test roads,
     Woodschurch Road, was examined to determined if crankcase oils
     were present.  Two oil patches each of several square inches in
     area and having "rainbow" colors were noted in shallow pools on the
     banks of the small stream.  Presumably,  the oils were deposited in
     their noted locations during a period of high stream flow.   Sam-
     pling and analysis of the oil patch indicated that the sample
     hydrocarbons  bore great similarity to the hydrocarbons extracted
     from the surface material of Woodschurch Road.   In addition, the
     sample hydrocarbons were similar to waste crankcase oil,  but dif-
     ferent from ten other common oils tested including #2 and #6 fuel
     oils.   Analysis was made by comparing the fluorescent spectral
     properties of the known materials with those of the sample.

10.  Lead in Soils and Plants

     Waste  crankcase oils have been reported  to contain up to
     1% lead by weight2 (See Table 5).   If ecological damage were to
     result from the application of waste oils to roads,  the high lead
     content of the oils could have significant bearing on that damage.
     Therefore,  tests were made to determine  if the  lead was leaving
     the road.   Samples were taken from oiled  and unoiled stretches  of
                              15

-------
    road, from drainage ditches at  the sides of  the roads, from a
    field 150 feet  away from  the oiled road, and at the outfall of a
    pipe carrying runoff water from several hundred feet of oiled road,
    Lead analyses of plant and soil samples from these areas are pre-
    sented  in Table 6.  Some  of the more significant results are:

        a.  The average lead  concentration in the oiled
            sections of road  was 209.25 mg/kg as compared
            to an average lead concentration in  the un-
            oiled sections of 39.0  mg/kg.

        b.  The soil samples  taken  in the (wheat) field
            150 feet from the road  show an average value
            of 24.0 mg/kg which is  somewhat higher than
            the expected background for the soil near a
            rural road.3

        c.  The plant samples taken in the same field as
            (b) above showed  an average lead concentration
            of 33.5 mg/kg, which is higher than the ex-
            pected background level.3

        d.  A possible explanation of (b) and (c) above is
            that there may be a transport mechanism in
            effect which associates lead (and/or oil)  with
            dust particles which are blown from the road
            surface by wind.  The field is higher in the
            overall drainage pattern than the road.

        e.  The soil samples  taken at the outfall of the
            drain pipe carrying runoff water from the
            road showed an average lead concentration of
            87.0 mg/kg.

        f.   Lead level in the oil sample provided by the
            waste oil collector averaged 350 ppm for
            three replicates.

        g.   Lead level in the waste oil from the local
            service station was 525 ppm average for
            three replicates. (Results by atomic absorb-
            tion spectrophotometer.)

11.  Biological Assessment of Lead in Test Aquatic Organisms

     Aquatic organisms  from a stream passing beneath one of the test
     roads  (Foot Hill Road)  were analyzed for lead content (See
     Table 7).   A small stream passed perpendicular to the oiled
     road,  and  drainage from the road entered the stream at the
     crossing.   The stream uphill of the test road did not receive
                               16

-------
                              TABLE 5

            TYPICAL COMPOSITION OF WASTE CRANKCASE OILS
    From FINAL REPORT OF THE API TASK FORCE ON USED OIL DISPOSAL

                 Port Mobil Test Fuel Inspections
 Gravity, °API

 Viscosity @ 100°F,  CS

 Viscosity @ 100°F,  SUS

 Viscosity @ 210°F,  CS

 Viscosity @ 21QOF,  SUS

 Flash Point,  °F

 Water (by Distillation)
  % Volume

 BS&W, %  Volume

 Sulfur,  % Wt.

 Ash, Sulfated % Wt.

 Lead

 Calcium,  % Wt.

 Zinc, % Wt.

 Phosphorous, % Wt.

Barium,  ppm

 Iron, ppm

Vanadium, ppm

   (1)   Viscosity, Furol @
   (2)   Poor Separation  on
       Waste Oil

  (Weighted Average
  of Four Deliveries)

  24.6

  53.3

  248

   9.18

  56.4

  215 (C.O.C.  Flash)


  4.4

  0.6(2)

  0.34

  1.81

  1.11% Wt.

  0.17

  0.08

  0.09

  568

  356

<5

122°F.  188
Waste Oil
                                                       No.  6  Fuel
 15.7

 915.7(1)

 4239

 33.5

 158

 192 (P.M. Flash)
0.7

1.9

0.08

59 ppm
440
                               17

-------
                              TABLE 6
Woodschurch Road
 Oil Road Surface

Foot Hill Road
 Oil Road Surface
Foot Hill Road
 Unoiled Road Surface
                       LEAD ANALYSIS RESULTS

                                         Sample Number
 1
 2

 3
 4
 5
 6
Woodschurch Road
 Drainage ditch bottom soil
 (Rocks, hard soil)
Drainage ditch
 Plants from side
Foot Hill Road
 Drainage ditch bottom soil
 (Soft soil)

Woodschurch Road
 Samples from field 50 yds. from road
 Soil
 Plants (wheat stubble)
Soil samples from field at end of
 drainage culvert (carrying runoff)
Waste oil samples from waste oil collector
 20% #5 Fuel Oil sludge
 80% Waste crankcase oil

Waste oil from local service station
 7
 8
 9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
 Lead Content mg/kg

     184.0
     223.0
     172.0
     258.0
         Avg

      36.0
      42.0
         Avg
      42.0
      59.0
         Avg

      42.0
      16.0
         Avg

     122.0
     150.0
         Avg
                                                                    = 209.25
                                                                    =  39.0
                                                                    =  50.5
                                                                       29.0
                        136.0
      25.0
      23.0
         Avg =  24.0

      32.0
      35.0
         Avg =  33.5
      96.0
      78.0
         Avg
                                                                       87.0
     350 ppm
(Avg of 3 applications)
     525 ppm
(Avg. of 3 applications)
                                      18

-------
     any other runoff and was, therefore, designated "control".
     The stream section downhill from the test road received the
     runoff from approximately 1,000 feet of 12 foot wide road,
     of which roughly 500 feet had been oiled.  This stream sec-
     tion was designated "contaminated".  A variety of aquatic
     organisms with varying feeding habits were collected, classified
     and analyzed for lead content from each of the stream sections.
     Collections were made approximately 100 yards upstream from the
     road on the control side, and approximately 200 yards downstream
     on the "contaminated side".

     The results of the lead analysis of tissues of the sample aquatic
     invertebrates are at best sketchy.  These data are not consistent
     with some of the control taxa exhibiting higher lead concentra-
     tions than the same taxa from the exposed section of the stream.

     The herbivorous mayflies from the "contaminated" area tend to have
     more lead in their tissues than do the control organisms (see
     pairs 1 and 2), but the predatory dipteran, Tjtpula, and the stone-
     flies, which contain the carnivor, Acroneuria, show a reverse
     trend (see pairs 3 and 4).  The filter-feeding blackflies exhibit
     more lead from the exposed area, possibly indicating a trannport
     of lead in suspension, but the web building caddis fly, Cheumato-
     p syche, shows a slight reversal of this tendency (see pairs 5 and
     6).  The omnivorous crayfish show no difference in lead content
     (see pair 7).

12.  Estimate of Lead Remaining in TestJRgaj.

     Total Lead Applied

         Total oil applied: 2930 —^11.
                    rr           yd  road surface

         Lead =0.7% oil by wt.

         0.007 x 2930 = 20.51 ^g^  ,
                              yd  road surface

     Lead Remaining in Road

         Pb in oiled surface
         Avg. concentration:                        290.25 mg/kg

        Pb in unoiled surface
        Avg.  concentration:                         39.0  mg/kg

        Net lead contributed by oil:                170.25 mg/kg
                               19

-------
            TAXA
                   TABLE  7

  ANALYSIS  OF AQUATIC  ORGANISMS  FOR LEAD

            CONTROL
                                                                         CONTAMINATED
 Pair
 No.

    fstonenema
     herbivorous mayfly
      nymphs
    Ephemerella
     herbivorous mayfly
      nymphs

    Ameletus
     herbivorous mayfly
      nymphs
    Paraleptophlebia
     herbivorous mayfly
      nymphs

   "Acroneuria
     carnivorous stonefly
      nymphs
    Allocapnia
     herbivorous stonefly
      nymphs

4   Tipula
     carnivorous cranefly
      larvae

5   Simulidae
     filter feeding
      blackfly larvae

6   Cheumatopsyche
    web-feeding caddis
      fly larvae

7   Cambarus bartonl
    omnivorous  crayfish    2.771
      adult
Dry Wt.
gm
.107
.104
.122
.065
No. Pb
in sample ppm Dry Wt .
10
14.22
904
151
20.74
75
Dry Wt.
gm
.064
.087
.095
.023
No. Pb
in sample ppm Dry Wt.
6
46.36
382
68
38.14
28
.073
.116
.159
.701
.059
 165
2075
  76
                       54.8
             44.03
14.26
                       50.80
                       19.84
                                   .156
            .062
           2.066
                                   .063
            .088
                        1.546
 17


 97



 14



207



 60
                                                          41.28
                                                          17.42
                                                71.43
                                                45.45
                                                          18.11
                                                20

-------
        . nriA,-. Ib Pb       ,  ,,, Ib road
        0.00017 — r-3 —  ,  x 4,644 — rg - ,
                yd  road          yd  road

        . 0.789 "Pb
                yd  road

     Percentage of Pb Applied  which Remains
13.  Sampling Procedures

     Road Surface

     The test roads were sampled for concentration of hydrocarbons at
     various depths.  Six inch diameter holes were bored in the road
     with a portable gasoline powered post hole auger.  After scraping
     the sides of the hole to remove extraneous material, 50 - 100 gram
     samples were removed from the sides of the hole at the depths of
     interest.  The "surface" sample was made up of a composite of sur-
     face material from the top inch of road.  Other samples were taken
     from approximately one onch thick layers of road material, with
     the center of the layer being at the depth of interest.  The holes
     were bored as deep as was possible with the equipment used; the
     road was apparently underlain with a very hard material which was
     impenetrable to the borer.

     Samples for Pb were taken from the road surface only.  All road
     samples were placed in plastic bags for transportation to the
     laboratory .

     Soil

     The soil samples in the drainage ditches and at the discharge end
     of the drainage culvert were taken by dislodging a small amount of
     (frozen) soil with a pick, and placing the sample in a plastic
     bag.  The soil samples from the wheat field 150 feet from the road
     were taken from cultivated soil by the same technique.  Samples
     were placed in plastic bags for transportation to the laboratory.

     Plants

     Plant samples collected in the field 150 feet away from the road
     were from the previous year's growth of wheat, and were taken by
     breaking off the wheat stalk at the ground, and placing the sample
     in a plastic bag.  Grass samples from the drainage ditches were
     taken by breaking off the grass at the soil line by hand, and
     placing the samples in plastic bags.
                               21

-------
     Aquatic Organisms

     Benthic organisms were sampled by disturbing the stream bottom
     material and allowing the organisms to be collected in a 500 y
     mesh sampling net.  The samples were preserved at the sampling
     site in 70% ethanol.

14.  Analysis Techniques

     Hydrocarbons

     Hydrocarbon material was extracted from samples with carbon
     tetrachloride (4 extractions at 25 cc each for a 1 liter sample),
     and the infrared spectral peak at 2930 cm 1 compared to the peak
     of known concentrations of similar oils in similar solvent.

     Lead

     Samples were prepared in accordance with ASTM designation D-1548-63
     (for vanadium,  adapted by the Edison Laboratory for lead).  The de-
     tection method  was atomic absorbtion spectrophotometry.
                              22

-------
                           SECTION V

                           DISCUSSION

When attempting to quantify the oil runoff from the test road, it is
obvious that only a small fraction of the oil applied to the road can
be accounted for as remaining in the road and volatilizing.  Unfortun-
nately, no satisfactory scheme can be found to account for oil trans-
ported from the road by adhesion to vehicles and dust transport, nor
can the effect of biodegradation be easily quantified.  It is there-
fore impossible to assign a numerical value to the amount of oil which
runs off the road by subtracting the sum of other effects from the
amount of oil applied.

However, Figures 2 through 5 clearly indicate that oil moves from the
surface of the test road with rain runoff, and anlytical results pre-
sented above indicated that oil found on the banks of a stream receiv-
ing runoff from the test road is similar in composition to oil extracted
from the test road surface.

It is the opinion of this investigator that volatilization, adhesion to
vehicles, and biodegradation taken all together probably account for
only 25 - 30% of the oil applied to the road surface.  The 70 - 75% of
the oil applied which leaves the roads by dust transport and runoff
could have significant ecological effects as a result of the oil or its
accompanying heavy metals, or both.

It seems significant to relate that the rural roads in question are
oiled twice yearly to suppress dust.  The oilings are performed in
late June and late August, which indicates that the oil has lost its
capability to suppress dust during July and August, and from August to
June.  It seems fair to assume that the predominant mechanisms of oil
loss from the road in the summer are volatilization and possibly dust
transport.  During the other months, rain runoff is most likely the
predominant mechanism, since roughly 80% of the yearly rainfall occurs
during the months  September through June (see Table 2).  In leaving
the road through the various mechanisms described, the oil does not
perform its intended function of dust suppression, however, it does
pose a significant threat of ecological damage.
                              23

-------
                      SECTION VI

                      REFERENCES

1.  U.S. Attorney's Office,  New York,  New York.   Estimate
    based upon Study of Waste Oil Disposal Practices  in
    Massachusetts, January 1969 by A.  D.  Little,  Inc.  and
    other sources.

2.  American Petroleum Institute, Final Report on the  Task
    Force on Used Oil Disposal.

3.  Motto, H. L., et al.  Lead in Soils and Plants:   Its
    Relationship to Traffic  Volume and Proximity  to High-
    ways, Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 4,
    March 1970,  pgs. 231-237.

-------
                  L^X—
     ROAD SAMPLE LOCATIONS
       NUMBERED 1 THRU 4
TEST STREAM
                           PLANT &
                           SOIL SAMPLES
     STREAM RUNOFF
   SAMPLE LOCATION
       TEST LOCATIONS MAP
        ADAPTED FROM THE
         FLEMINGTON, N.J.
       U.S.G.S. QUADRANGLE

               Figure 1

                26

-------
                            Figure 2

    Woodschurch Road looking north from our sampling station.
  Bluish tint on road surface is due to oil.   Photo taken after
a light rain, and six months after the last oiling in August  1971,
                            Figure 3

     Blue oil patch has been squeezed from soft  road  surface
     material by compression of vehicle tires.   When  walking
     on oiled sections of this road, one's footprints become
                         tinted bluish.
                                27

-------
                       Figure 4

       Oil on puddle surface, Woodschurch Road.
                       Figure 5

Oil which has been squeezed from road surface material
 moves with water runoff toward drainage ditch at the
                   side of the road.

                           28

-------
                         Figure 6

Oil on the  surface of a drainage ditch  at the side of the
road.  This  oily water will be transported from this ditch
            into streams during periods  of rain.
                                     » U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 18T2 O - 490-J24
                             29

-------