United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Environmental Research
Laboratory
Corvallis OR 97330
EPA-600/3-80-013
January 1980
Research and Development
Sensitivity of Soil
Regions to Acid
Precipitation
-------
RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:
1. Environmental Health Effects Research
2. Environmental Protection Technology
3. Ecological Research
4. Environmental Monitoring
5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
6. Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
7. Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
8. "Special" Reports
9 Miscellaneous Reports
This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH series. This series
describes research on the effects of pollution on humans, plant and animal spe-
cies, and materials. Problems are assessed for their long- and short-term influ-
ences, Investigations include formation, transport, and pathway studies to deter-
mine the fate of pollutants and their effects. This work provides the technical basis
for setting standards to minimize undesirable changes in living organisms in the
aquatic, terrestrial, and atmospheric environments.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
-------
EPA-600/3-80-013
January 1980
SENSITIVITY OF SOIL REGIONS TO ACID PRECIPITATION
by
William W. McFee
Department of Agronomy
Purdue University
West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
Contract Number B0531NAEX
Project Officer
Charles F. Powers
Terrestrial Division .
Environmental Research Laboratory
Corvallis, Oregon 97330
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
CORVALLIS, OREGON 97330
-------
DISCLAIMER
One of the principal reasons for the preparation of this report for the
Environmental Protection Agency was to supply scientifically valid information
which could be incorporated into the EPA SC^-Particulate Matter Criteria
document, presently in the final stages of preparation. A strict requirement
pertaining to that document is that any scientific information used there must
be published (or at least in press) by January 1, 1980. Because of this
demanding time constraint, it was necessary that the contractor prepare this
report in a shorter time than would ordinarily be attempted, and that it be
published by EPA without undergoing peer review. We feel that early publi-
cation of these results in order to stimulate the broadest scientific dis-
cussion prior to completion of the criteria document justified waiving our
normally more rigorous prepublication review requirements. Publication,
however, does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the views and
policies of EPA, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products con-
stitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
-------
FOREWORD
Effective regulatory and enforcement actions by the Environmental Protec-
tion Agency would be virtually impossible without sound scientific data on
pollutants and their impact on environmental stability and human health.
Responsibility for building this data base has been assigned by EPA's Office
of Research and Development and its 15 major field installations, one of which
is the Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory.
The primary mission of the Corvallis Laboratory is research on the ef-
fects of environmental pollutants on terrestrial, freshwater, and marine
ecosystems; the behavior, effects and control of pollutants in lake and stream
systems; and the development of predictive models on the movement of pollu-
tants in the biosphere.
This report is concerned with the sensitivity of soils to acid precipi-
tation. Maps of potential sensitivity for the eastern United States are
presented.
Thomas A. Murphy
Director
Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
111
-------
ABSTRACT
Criteria for ranking soil sensitivity to the effects of acid precipitation
are discussed. A ranking scheme based on cation exchange capacity and presence
or absence of carbonate in the top 25 cm of soil and presence or absence of
flooding was devised. Five map units varying in potential sensitivity and
percentage of the area considered sensitive were used to map the eastern U.S..
Maps of 27 eastern states and a generalized map of the eastern U.S. were pre-
pared. It is recognized that other factors could be considered to improve the
ranking scheme and that land use, which is ignored in these maps, has an effect
overshadowing that of acid precipitation. The maps should be useful in
research planning and in selecting areas for intensive study. The ranking of
sensitivities is not intended to predict severity of effects but to guide the
selection of terrestrial and aquatic sites to areas where the potential for
adverse impacts of long term atmospheric deposition are the greatest. The
need for field testing of the system is obvious. The areas that are poten-
tially sensitive are concentrated in the southeastern United States on highly
weathered soils, on the shallow and steep soils of the Appalachian Highland
regions in the Adirondack Mountains, and on the coarse, non-basic tills of
New England.
iv
-------
CONTENTS
Foreword ...........................
Abstract ............................ iv
Figures ............................ vi
1. Introduction ..................... 1
2. Conclusions ...................... 3
3. Methods ....................... 4
Rationale for Sensitivity Classes ........ 4
Sensitivity Classes .............. • 6
Mapping Units .................. 6
Sources of Information .............. 6
Map Preparation ................. 7
4. Results ................... .... 8
North central states ............... 8
Northeastern states ............... 9
Central states .................. 9
Southeastern states ............... 10
Eastern United States .............. 10
Literature Cited ........................ 12
Appendices
A. Mapping units by state ............ 43
B. Sources of soil information ......... 175
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Number Page
1 Sensitivity of the soils of Wisconsin .14
2 Michigan 15
3 Indiana 16
4 Ohio 17
5 Illinois 18
6 Pennsylvania 19
7 New York 20
8 New Jersey 21
9 Vermont 21
10 New Hampshire 22
11 Maine 23
12 Connecticut 24
13 Rhode Island 24
14 Massachusetts 25
15 ' Kentucky 26
16 West Virginia 27
17 Tennessee 28
18 Mississippi 29
19 Louisiana 30
20 Alabama 31
21 Georgia . 32
22 Florida 33
23 South Carolina 34
24 North Carolina 35
25 Virginia 36
26 Maryland 37
27 Delaware 38
28 The Eastern United States .... 39
29 Land Use Map of the Eastern United States .......... 41
vi
-------
INTRODUCTION
Several networks of atmospheric deposition stations are gathering
conclusive data showing that eastern United States and Canada receive acid
precipitation. There is a potential for deleterious effects of this acid on
both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Only limited information on the
effects on aquatic systems is available and essentially none is published on
effects of soils and plants in naturally occurring (field) terrestrial eco-
systems. Since acid precipitation is so widespread and the potential harm is
subtle, there is a need to concentrate our research efforts in areas most
likely to be susceptible.
Soils are continually changing, yet remain one of the most stable
components of terrestrial ecosystems. The formation of soil horizons of
significant depth by weathering processes starting from rock or even unconsol-
idated deposits requires thousands or even millions of years. On the other
hand, significant changes in root length occur in a few weeks and changes in
bacterial numbers within days or even hours. In general, however, soils are
very resilient. They tolerate large inputs of sundry materials and retain,
or within a short time, revert to their original condition. This apparent
stability sometimes lulls us into a false sense that soil productivity is
indestructible. We are dependent upon the soil's ability to support cycle
after cycle of vegetation in both natural and cultivated systems which produce
the vast majority of our food and fiber. Lessons that date to antiquity in
some parts of the world and at least into the 1930's in the United States
taught that soils are vulnerable to erosion. Present knowledge is not ade-
quate to predict the degree of adverse effects of acid deposition on soils,
but we should not assume that soils will not be damaged by agents other than
wind and water.
-------
Sulfur deposition to soils is not all bad. It is, in fact, frequently
needed and if the deposition were all CaSO,, it is doubtful if harmful effects
would be noticed anywhere in terrestrial ecosystems, but since much of the
sulfate is balanced by hydrogen ions, the input is a dilute strong acid which
has considerable potential for affecting the system. Atmospheric deposition
of acid and other materials may pose a significant threat to some soils and the
ecosystems they support. In recent reports, some of the known and expected
effects of acid precipitation have been summarized as follows, (Wood, 1979;
Hutchinson, 1979; Galloway, Cowling, Gorham, McFee, 1978):
1. Natural soil-formation processes in humid regions lead to acidification
and acid precipitation accelerates this process.
2. The sensitivity of soils to acidification by acid precipitation depends
on the soil buffer capacity and pH. Noncalcareous, sandy soils with pH>5
are the most sensitive to acidification.
3. Very acid soils are less sensitive to acidification. However, even a
slight loss of nutrients by leaching may be detrimental.
4. Acid inputs increase leaching of exchangeable plant nutrients.
5. Acidification slows many soil microbiological processes, such as N
fixation, decay of plant residues and nitrification.
6. Acid precipitation increases the leaching losses of Al which may be
detrimental to associated aquatic environments.
7. Amendments used in field crop production have a large effect on soil
acidity and overshadow acid precipitation influences on most cultivated
soils.
8. There are large uncultivated areas that have soils that are poorly buffered
and potentially sensitive to acid precipitation.
There are other known and suspected effects of acid precipitation in the
cited references, however, this report is concerned with the regions where
most of the sensitive soils (item 8 above) occur.
The sensitivity of soils to the effects of acid precipitation has been
dl- .-~>sed by several authors. Wiklander (1973/74, 1974) and Bache (1979) have
presented excellent descriptions of cation exchange reactions involved in soil
acidification and described the relationship of buffering capacity, base
saturation, and "lime potential" to soil susceptibility to acidification.
Reuss (1975) and McFee and Kelly (1977) have pointed out the importance of N
2
-------
and S transformations in influencing soil acidity and the slowness of acid
precipitation in changing soil. In all of these discussions, it is apparent
that the four parameters which follow are important in estimating soil
sensitivity to acid precipitation:
1. The total buffering capacity or cation exchange capacity provided primar-
ily by the clay and soil organic matter.
2. The base saturation of that exchange capacity which can be estimated by
the pH of the soil.
3. The management system imposed on the soil, is it cultivated and amended
with fertilizers, lime, or renewed by flooding or other additions.
s
4. The presence or absence of carbonates in the soil profile.
The objective of this project was to develop maps of the eastern United
States that delineate soil areas according to their expected sensitivity to
the effects of acid precipitation.
CONCLUSIONS
When generalized to a scale suitable for the eastern United States, the
areas containing most of the soils that are potentially sensitive to acid
precipitation are in the upper coastal plains and Piedmont regions of the
southeast, along the Appalachian Highlands, through the east central and
northeastern areas, and in the Adirondack Mountains of New York. Areas
considered most sensitive usually appear as small areas with less sensitive
regions and are too small to show on maps of the eastern U.S.. Numerous such
areas are mapped on state maps in New York around the Adirondack Mountains, in
mountainous regions of West Virginia and Pennsylvania, and in the well drained
sandy coastal plains of North and South Carolina.
The somewhat arbitrary criteria established here (i.e., 25 years of input
of acid must exceed 10 and 25% of CEC in 25 cm of soil in order for the soil
to be considered slightly sensitive or sensitive, respectively) led to
extensive areas being declared potentially "slightly sensitive" and only a
very small area "sensitive." These criteria need field testing before further
mapping of this type is performed.
The soil association maps and chemical data available for some states
were not adequate for such a mapping exercise and some inconsistencies and
-------
state-line irregularities resulted. Most of the state maps are useful for
getting an overview and should aid in selecting areas for ecosystem studies.
They should be used in conjunction with land use maps since agricultural
amendments to soil will overshadow acid precipitation effects.
METHODS
The first step was to define "sensitivity11 as it is used here in relation
to soils and acid precipitation. Sensitivity of soils to acidification,
alone, seemed too narrow even though that may be the most important long term
effect. Soils influence the quality of waters in associated streams and lakes
and may be changed in ways other than simple pH-base saturation relationships,
e.g., microbiological populations of the surface layers, accelerated loss of
Al by leaching. Therefore, criteria were sought that would relate to soil
"sensitivity" to any change brought about by acid precipitation that would be
important in the local ecosystem.
RATIONALE FOR SENSITIVITY CLASSES
Factors affecting sensitivity to acid inputs in the list above were
evaluated for their wide applicability and ready availability for use in
broad scale mapping. As pointed out earlier, management that includes
amendments will mask effects of acid precipitation and should be considered
in the final analysis. We chose to ignore land use in this effort with
the intent of eventually overlaying land use maps on the soil maps. Most of
the serious soil effects are tied to changes in pH or changes in leaching.
The soil's susceptibility to changes in either of these is most closely tied
to its cation exchange capacity (CEC). If the soil has a low CEC and a
circumneutral pH, then acid inputs are likely to reduce pH rapidly. A soil
with a high CEC is strongly buffered against changes in pH or leachate compo-
sition. Acid soils, pH near that of the acid precipitation, on the other hand,
will not change in pH rapidly in response to acid inputs, but are likely to
+3
release Al ions in the leachate. Further, soils with a low CEC have a low
reserve of plant nutrients and slight losses may be significant to their
productivity. Therefore, even though it is apparent that CEC, or buffering
-------
capacity, does not completely define the soil sensitivity to acid inputs, it
was chosen as the primary criteria in this attempt at regional mapping of soil
sensitivity to acid precipitation. Soils that contain free carbonates which
will react with acid inputs are generally believed to be little affected by
acid precipitation and were, therefore, classed "non-sensitive." Likewise,
any soil subject to frequent deposition, such as those in floodplains, are
unlikely to be strongly affected by acid precipitation.
In much of the literature, it is frequently stated that soils with low
CEC or sandy soils with low organic matter are likely to be most susceptible
to effects of acid precipitation. However, these "low CEC" values have not
been quantified. In order to develop a working set of classes, certain
assumptions and "worst case" calculations were made. Since soils are, in
general, rather resistant to change by acid inputs, a fairly high acid input
was assumed and the question asked, "what is the maximum effect that it could
have on soil, and how high would the CEC have to be to resist that effect?"
Arbitrarily, a 25 year span was chosen. If the maximum probable acid
input (100 cm of precipitation at pH 3.7 per annum) in that period is equal
to 10-25% of the cation exchange capacity in the top 25 cm of soil, a signif-
icant effect might occur. This is the case when the top 25 cm of soil has an
average CEC of 6.2-15.4 me/100 g (also assumes a bulk density of 1.3 g/cc),
and these soils were considered slightly sensitive. If that same acid input
exceeds 25% of the CEC in the top 25 cm, i.e., when the CEC is less than 6.2
me/100 g, the soils are considered sensitive.
I am certainly aware that these criteria are arbitrary in many ways, that
arguments can be made for different assumptions about inputs, for the use of
shallower or deeper depths, for the use of % base saturation, and many other
adjustments. However, both our limited knowledge of the effects of acid
precipitation on soils and the generalized information available on the
distribution of soil associations and their properties make this a reasonable
first approach to mapping sensitive soil regions.
-------
SENSITIVITY CLASSES
The following classes were established:
1. Non-sensitive areas (NS): (a) includes all soils that are calcareous (i.e.»j
contain free carbonates) in the surface layers (within 25 cm), (b) includes
all soils that are subjected to frequent flooding. It is assumed that the
renewal effects of fresh deposition would mask acid precipitation effects,
(3) includes all soils with an average CEC greater than 15.4 me/100 g in
the top 25 cm.
2. Slightly sensitive areas (SS) includes areas not in 1 (a) or 1 (b) that
have average CEC in the range 15.4 to 6.2 me/100 g in the top 25 cm.
3. Sensitive areas (s) includes those areas not in 1 (a) or 1 (b) that have
average CEC less than 6.2 me/100 g in the top 25 cm.
MAPPING UNITS
The sensitive areas S and SS are frequently intermingled in the landscape
with non-sensitive areas, therefore, an attempt was made to indicate the
proportion of the area included within each mapping unit that is a sensitive
soil class. The sensitive areas were subdivided and the following five
mapping units were used at the most detailed level mapped.
NS - The area contains mostly non-sensitive areas
SI - Sensitive soils dominate the area
SSI - Slightly sensitive soils dominate the area
S2 - Sensitive soils are significant, but cover less than 50% of the
area
SS2 - Slightly sensitive soils are significant, but cover less than 50%
of the area.
SOURCES OF INFORMATION
The distribution of soil associations was either taken directly from
state soil association maps, regional soil association maps, or in a few cases,
generalized from county maps. The level of detail, scale and age of maps
varied widely, and we used our best judgment in smoothing boundaries that were
interrupted at state lines. Whatever data we could find concerning cation
exchange capacity and other chemical or physical properties of the soils within
6
-------
the associations were utilized to estimate the CEC of the dominant soils of
the association. The most frequent source was the chemical data in the "Soil
Survey Laboratory Data and Descriptions," series published by the Soil
Conservation Service, USDA« In the absence of CEC determinations, we estimated
it, based on the soil classification, location and parent material, information
given on organic matter and texture, or personal knowledge of the soils. For
example, the great group, Quartzipsaments, was assumed to have rather low CEC
and placed in the sensitive group when more detailed information was missing.
Likewise, sandstone derived soils on sloping areas in rough terrain or sandy
outwash terraces would be considered sensitive, whereas a lacustrine deposit
or medium to fine textured glacial till plains would be considered nonsensitive
if CEC data were unavailable.
MAP PREPARATION
In each state or region, a list of mapping units on the source map or
maps was compiled (Appendix A). Then, the available literature was searched
for information and each mapping unit assigned a sensitivity rating based on
the CEC, or estimated CEC, presence of carbonates and susceptibility to flood-
ing. The dominant soils within an association frequently differed in their
rating. If two of the dominant soils, where 2 or 3 were listed, were of the
same sensitivity, the numeral "1" was added to the symbol (e.g., SSI or SI).
If only the second of a list of two, or any one of a list of three, was
sensitive, an occurrence rating of 2 was assigned (SS2 or S2, indicating a
significant but less than 50% occurrence of the sensitive soils in the mapping
unit).
A list of the soil maps and references used for soil data is in Appendix
B.
The mapping units were, then, drawn on overlays at the same sale as the
original soil map used. They were, then, converted to a common 1:2,500,000
scale and compiled into an Eastern United States map. Individual state or
region maps were also retained in this report. In some cases, the state maps
depict more detail than that transferred to the smaller scale, Eastern United
States map.
-------
RESULTS
Maps of each of the states of the Eastern United States (Figures 1 - 27)
display the distribution of sensitive soil areas. The amount of detail shown
in the various states depends upon the detail available in soil association
maps. The smallest areas mapped in most states are on the order of 20 square
miles. In using such maps, it must be remembered that every area will have
inclusions of other soil types. Most of the mapping units designated "non-
sensitive" (NS) will include small areas of "slightly sensitive" (SS) or
"sensitive" (S) soils. The reverse is also obviously true. Land use is
ignored in making these maps. They are based only on soil features, primarily
CEC and presence of carbonates. Land use maps should overlay on these to
determine sensitive areas not affected by agricultural practices.
NORTH CENTRAL STATES
The north central region, including Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois,
Indiana, and Ohio, is dominated by soils formed in glacial deposits of rela-
tively young age or water or wind deposits of that same era. Where the
deposits are medium or fine textured, the soils are well buffered. Therefore,
the region as a whole is nonsensitive to slightly sensitive. The soils likely
to be sensitive are concentrated in the northern parts of Wisconsin and
Michigan (Figures 1 and 2) on coarse textured glacial deposits, and to a
lesser degree, in southern Indiana and Ohio (Figures 3 and 4) on much older,
medium textured soils of older glacial or residual origins. The areas in the
southern part of the region, mapped (SS), are frequently borderline in the
criteria established and are probably less sensitive than those in the northern
portion. Most of the Illinois soils are sufficiently high in CEC to be ranked
nonsensitive (Figure 5).
8
-------
NORTHEASTERN STATES
This area, including New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and the New
England states, includes large regions of slightly sensitive and sensitive
areas with nonsensitive areas interspersed. In Pennsylvania (Figure 6), the
sensitive areas are related to the Alleghany uplands and the ridges in the
ridge and valley area to the east. In New York (Figure 7), the sensitive areas
are concentrated in the Adirondack Region where most of the soils are derived
from coarse, non-basic, glacial till or sandy outwash deposits. Significant
areas are also found east of the Hudson and on Long Island. In New Jersey
(Figure 8), the sensitive areas are in the well drained sandy areas. The New
England states (Figures 9-14) contain a large area of slightly sensitive soils,
however, the map detail and cation exchange data available for that area was
variable. Our maps for Vermont and New Hampshire are not very reliable. They
probably do not adequately show the differences in sensitivity within, nor do
they mesh well with adjoining states. Most of the State of Maine (Figure 11)
is slightly sensitive, and that complex pattern of varying sensitivity should
carry westward into New Hampshire and Vermont (Figures 9 and 10).
CENTRAL STATES
In Kentucky, West Virginia, and Tennessee (Figures 15-17), most of the
soils are highly weathered from a variety of residual parent materials. The
long weathering periods in relatively warm wet climates have produced highly
leached soils, most of which have a moderate or low CEC. Therefore, by the
criteria used here, large portions of these states are mapped in the slightly
sensitive category with varying degrees of inclusions (SSI or SS2). The
Cumberland Mountains and Plateau area of Tennessee and Kentucky where most of
the soils are shallow and derived from sandstone is an extensive area where
nearly all the soils are sensitive or slightly sensitive. In West Virginia,
eastern Kentucky, and eastern Tennessee, the shallow soils of the steep slopes
are usually lower in buffering capacity than the valley soils between the
ridges. The result is a very complex pattern of mapping units lying parallel
to the ridge and valley alignment. A surprising amount of western Tennessee
(Figure 17) and Kentucky (Figure 15) appear in the slightly sensitive catego-
ries. Many o.f the soils in these areas (and of Mississippi, Figure 18) are
-------
formed in wind blown silts of considerable depth. The CEC fell slightly below
our arbitrary dividing point in most cases, and, therefore, they were mapped
"slightly sensitive." However, the effects will certainly be small and agri-
cultural practices will conceal any effects that do occur since a high per-
centage of that land is cropped.
SOUTHEASTERN STATES
The states that form the east and south coasts from Louisiana around to
Delaware and Maryland (Figures 18-27) have sandy coastal plains deposits in
common. Where these deposits are well drained and have low organic matter
content as they usually do in the "sand hills" and rolling lands, they are
considered sensitive or slightly sensitive. The Piedmont region contained
both slightly sensitive and nonsensitive regions, and most of the Appalachian
region was in one of the sensitive categories. Where soil maps were in
sufficient detail as they were in Georgia (Figure 21), most of the stream
valleys are mapped NS. The Mississippi Delta (Figures 18, 19) and the belt of
dark heavy textured soils across Alabama and eastern Mississippi (Figures 18
and 20) are nonsensitive regions.
EASTERN UNITED STATES
In Figure 28, a generalized map of the eastern United States is presented.
It is apparent that using criteria we established, large portions of the
country have soils that may be sensitive to long term effects of acid precipi-
tation. These areas are concentrated in the southeastern United States on
highly weathered soils, on the shallow and sloping soils of the Appalachian
Highland regions, in the Adirondack Mountains, and coarse tills of the New
England states. In much of this area, the southeastern United States in
particular, a high percentage of these soils are in cultivation and any effects
of acid precipitation will be overshadowed by effects of soil amendments, such
as lime and fertilizers (Fig. 29).
This exercise produced maps that appear to be useful in research planning
and obtaining an overview of soil resources related to the acid precipitation
phenomena. Most of the state maps appear to be reasonable based on current
soil and geologic knowledge. It is apparent that additional soil data should
10
-------
be obtained, the criteria refined, and the maps improved at these scales or
more detailed levels. Obviously, field testing is needed before new criteria
are defined. Until better information is available, if land use maps are
overlaid on these maps and natural or unmanaged areas are located that also
contain a high percentage of potentially "sensitive" soils, one can locate
regions where research has a higher probability of detecting acid precipitation
effects.
We should not ignore the possibility of serious effects accruing to soils
from atmospheric deposition, but until we have a firm data base, we should
heed the advice of B. T. Mason (1977) of the UK Meteorological Office. Where
he was speaking of the atmosphere, we could substitute the word, "soils."
"The atmosphere is a robust system with a built-in capacity to counteract any
perturbation .... Sensational warning of imminent catastrophe, unsupported
by firm figures, not only are irresponsible, but likely to prove counter-
productive. The atmosphere is wont to make fools of those who do not show
proper respect for its complexity and resilence."
Defining and locating soil areas most likely to be sensitive to acid
precipitation is a logical step toward gathering "firm facts and figures."
11
-------
LITERATURE CITED
Bache, Byron. 1979. The Acidification of Soils. In: Hutchinson (ed). See
Hutchinson (1979).
Galloway, J. N., E. B. Cowling, E. Gorham, W. W. McFee. 1978. A national
program for assessing the problem of atmospheric deposition (Acid Rain).
A Report to C.E.Q. National Atmospheric Deposition Program, NC-141.
Hutchinson, T. (ed) 1979. Effects of Acid Precipitation on the Terrestrial
Ecosystem. Proceedings of NATO Adv. Res. Institute, Toronto, Canada (in
Press).
McFee, W. W. and J. M. Kelly. 1977. Air Pollution: Impact on Soils. In:
New Directions in Century Three. Strategies for Land Uses. Proceedings
of the Soil Conservation Soc. of America, SCSA, Ankeny, Iowa.
Reuss, John D. 1975. Chemical and Biological Relationships Relevant to the
Effect of Acid Rainfall on the Soil-plant System. In: Proceedings of
First International Symposium on Acid Precipitation and the Forest
Ecosystem. U.S.D.A.F.S. Tech. Report NE-23. p. 791-813.
Wiklander, Lambert. 1973/74. The Acidification of Soils. In: -Wood, M. J.
(ed) see Wood (1979).
Wood, M. J. (ed) 1979. Ecological Effects of Acid Precipitation. Reports of
workshop held at Cally Hotel, Gatehouse-of-Fleet, Galloway, U.K. 4-7
Sept. 1978. EPRI SOA77-403, Electric Power Res. Institute, 3412 Hillview
Ave., Palo Alto, California 94303.
12
-------
Figures 1-27
Soil sensitivity in the 27 states east of the Mississippi River.
KEY
NS - mostly non-sensitive
SI - sensitive
SSI - slightly sensitive
S2 - sensitive <50 percent
SS2 - slightly sensitive <50 percent
13
-------
Figure 1
STATE OF WISCONSIN
0 10 20 30 40 50
MILES
-------
Figure 2
L5
-------
Figure 3
16
-------
17
-------
Figure 5
State of Illinois
miles
18
-------
State of Pennsylvania
g , ,„ »_ _y
Figure 6
-------
State of New York
Figure 7
-------
/
\
;
\
NS
9
*
Figure 9
State of Vermont
0
25
miles
50
3Z
75
=1
Figure 8
21
-------
Figure 10
/
i
/
NS
r
•-
State of New Hampshire
25 50 75
1-1 1
m lies
22
-------
23
-------
-------
Figure 14
25
-------
State of Kentucky
Figure 15
-------
State of West Virginia
miles
Figure 16
27
-------
00
v _. .
SUM ol T.
Figure 17
t »
-------
Figure 18
J
29
-------
Figure 19
30
-------
Figure 20
State of Alabama
0 10 30 30 40
-------
State of Georgia
° v
Figure 21
32
-------
Figure 22
-------
Figure 23
State of South Carolina
« B
-------
tn
Figure 24
-------
State of Virginia
Figure 25
r
f
X
>
-------
St.l. of M.ryl.nd
Figure 26
t I =*-
37
-------
38
-------
Figure 28
Soil sensitivity in the eastern United States,
39
-------
REGIONS WITH SIGNIFICANT
AREAS OF SOILS THAT ARE
NON SENSITIVE
SLIGHTLY SENSITIVE
SENSITIVE
WITHIN THE EASTERN U S
Figure 28
40
-------
Figure 29
Major land uses in the eastern United States.
41
-------
A Cropland
B Grazed Woodland
C Ungrazed Woodland
D Swamp & Marshland
42
-------
APPENDIX A
The mapping units shown on the source maps and the sensitivity
°r susceptibility ratings assigned to each.
43
-------
ALABAMA
Land Resource
Soil Association
Assoc
CEC Suscept. Suscep1
Level Ratid
1 . Soils of the
limestone
valleys and
uplands.
(Paleudults,
Fragiudults)
2. Soils of the
Appalachian
plateau.
(Hapludults,
Dystrochrepts)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Barf i el d-
Rockland, limestone
Cheaha-
Leesburg
Colbert-
Conasauga-
Fi res tone
Conasauga-
Firestone-
Talbott
Decatur-
Dewey
Decatur-
Dewey-
Allen
Dickson
Fullerton
Holston-
McQueen-
Chewacla
Lobel vi lie-
Lee
Mlnvale-
Bodine-
Fullerton
Minvale-
Fullerton
Hartsells-
Linker-
Albertville
Hartsells-
Rockland, limestone-
Hector 44
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
ll*'
ssi
NS
NS
ssi
j J'
ssi
ssi
NS
NS
1 »**
ssi
ssi
J"'
SS*
ff
ssi
-------
•ABAMA
S?11s of the
fineau.
Wudults,
Khodudults)
p°1]s of the
defies.
HapluHChrePtS>
feudal fs)
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Hartsells-
Wynnville-
Albertville
Hector-
Rockland, limestone-
Allen
Montevallo-
Townley-
Enders
Appl ing-
Cecil
Cecil-
Grover-
Madison
Davidson-
Hiwassee-
Gwinnett
Iredell-
Mecklenburg
Gwinnett-
Ceci 1 -
Appl ing
Madison-
Louisa-
Madi son-
Tall apoosa
Musella-
Gwinnett-
Hiwassee
Tallapoosa-
Tatum
Demopolis-
Sumter-
Oktibbeha
Sumter-
Oktibbeha-
Leeper
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7.6
7.6
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7.6
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
SS2
SS2
SSI
SSI
SSI
NS
I1*J
SSI
SSI
ijllj I
SSI
ww 1
SSI
SSI
"JW 1
NS
NS
45
-------
ALABAMA
28. Wilcox- 27.6 NS
Mayhew- * NS NS
Eutaw 41.1 NS
29. Boswell- * NS NS
Susquehanna * NS
5. Soils of the 30. Dothan- * SS
Coastal Plains. Fuquay- * SS SSl
(Paleudults, Wagram * SS
Hapludults)
31. Dothan- * SS
Orangeburg- * 55 SSl
Esto * SS
32. Flomaton- * SS
Smithdale- * SS SS?
Rock!and, limestone * NS
33. Luverne- * NS
Smithdale- * SS NS
Boswell * NS
34. Malbis- * SS
Orangeburg- * SS SS?
Pansey * NS
35. McLaurin- * SS
Troup- * SS SSl
Ruston 5.7 5
36. Orangeburg- * SS
Dothan- * SS <-st
Luverne- * NS
Red Bay 5.6 S
37. Orangeburg- * SS
Red Bay- 5.6 S .H
Dothan- * SS
Troup * SS
38. Poarch- * SS
Benndale- * SS SS2
Escambia * NS
39. Lucedale- * SS «-ci
Bama * SS
40. Ruston- 5.7 S .«
Dickson * SS
41. Savannah- 8.0 SS
Ruston- 5.7 S SSl
Stough 8.1 SS
46
-------
°f
floodplalns
of
marshes.
prists,
42.
43.
44.
Smithdale
Luverne-
Flomaton
Smithdale-
Luverne-
Troup
Smithdale-
Troup-
Lucedale-
Luverne
45. Smithton-
Escambia-
Troup
46. Troup-
Alga-
Lucy
47. Troup-
Luverne-
Dothan-
Orangeburg
48. Troup-
Plummer-
Escambia
49. Troup-
Smithdale-
Esto
50. Troup-
Smithdale-
Malbis-
Escambia
51.
Luverne-
Boswell-
Quitman-
Smithdale
52. Red Bay-
Orangeburg
53. Cahaba-
Chewacla-
Myatt .
54. Dorovan-
Plummer-
Tidal Marsh
55. Osier-
Johnston
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
3.4
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
5.6
*
*
*
*
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
s
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
47
*
*
*
8
*
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
SS2
SSI
NS
SSI
SSI
SS2
SSI
SSI
NS
S2
NS
NS
NS
-------
CONNECTICUT
Land Resources
Soil Association
Assoc.
CEC Suscept. Suscept
Level Rating
1 . Areas of the
eastern and western
highlands dominated
by soils formed in
glacial till derived
from gneiss, schist,
and granite.
2. Areas of the
eastern and western
-highlands dominated
by soils formed in
stratified deposits
derived from gneiss,
schist, and granite.
3. Areas of the
western highlands
dominated by soils
formed in glacial
till derived from
limestone and schist,
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
n.
12.
13.
1
Brimfield-
Brookfield
Hollis-
Bernardston
Hollis-
Charlton
Hollis-
Woodbridge
Broadbrook-
Rainbow
Paxton-
Woodbridge
Canton-
Hollis-
Charlton
Charl ton-
Roll is
Narragansett-
Hollis
Agawam-
Merrimac-
Hinckley
Haven-
Reypol
Hinckley-
Merrimac
Stockbridge-
Farmington-
Amenia
*
*
*
*
*
14.3
*
17.5
*
*
21.8
17.5
*
*
14.3
14.3
*
*
*
6.9
41.1
7.6
*
it
7.6
41.1
15.1
*
18.1
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
ss
ss
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
M^
SS2
SSI
SS2
NS
t\+J
NS
1 1 w
SSI
SSI
k_J W '
NS
li**
j-. *• n
SS2
NS
SS2
NS
48
-------
of the
n highlands
by soils
in stratified
ts derived
limestone
schist.
of the
al lowlands
Connecticut
r Valley domin-
by Soiis formed
till
from sand-
1 shale>
o-nerate, and
14. Copake-
Groton
*
*
SS
ss
SSI
1
F
o!?S of
ds
v
'e
tne central
ons of the
ecticut River
demonated
ls formed in
deposits
sand-
and
15. Cheshire-
Wetherfield-
Holyoke
16. Cheshire-
Yalesville
17. Narragansett-
Broadbrook-
Holyoke
18. Narragansett-
Chelshire
19. Holyoke-
Wethersfield-
Chelshire
20. Wethersfield-
Holyoke-
Broadbrook
21. Wethersfield-
Ludlow
22. Branford-
Manchester
23. Enfield-
Agawatn-
Manchester
24. Hartford-
Manchester
25. Penwood-
Manchester
26.
Windsor-
Ninigret-
Merrimac
27. Elrnwood-
Buxton-
Scantic
28. Scantic-
Buxton-
Broadbrook
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
6.9
*
*
*
*
*
6.0
17.1
41.1
*
20.5
*
*
20.5
*
SS
NS
NS
SS
ss
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
s
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SSI
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
NS
NS
NS
49
-------
CONNECTICUT
29. Hadley- 11.8 SS ^
Winooski 19.6 NS
30. Rumney- * NS N$
Podunk 14.5 SS
Areas of the 31. Westbrook * NS N$
coastal lowlands
affected by tidal
water dominated
by soils formed
in organic matter.
50
-------
Resou
rces
Soil Associations
Assoc.
CEC Suscept. Suscept.
Levels Rating
!j"9 *oils 1. Gleneg-
Lne Piedmont. Manor-
Chester
2. Neshanriny-
Aldino-
Wetchung
'y sloping 3. Neshaminy-
5 along the Talleyville-
hne. Urban land
4. Elsinboro-
Delanco-
Urban land
5. Urban land
6. Aldino-
Keyport-
Mattapex-
Urban land
ljy Jevel 7. Matapeake-
»tai ^e Sassafras-
jnateiyain" Urban land
Gained. 8. Sassafras-
Fallsington-
Matapeake
9. Matapeake-
Sassafras
10. Sassafras-
Fallsington
11. Evesboro-
Rumford-
Fallsington
1 y level 12. Fallington-
5tai i11? Sassafras-
lriatel n~~ Woodstown
iS6ly well~ 13- Keyport-
ih^ to Poorly Elkton
22.2
13.7
16.6
14.6
*
*
14.6
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
12.3
*
14.8
6.4
*
6.4
*
14.8
14.8
6.4
6.4
*
3.8
*
*
*
6.4
8.9
*
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
S
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
SS2
SSI
SS2
SSI
SS2
NS
-------
DELAWARE
Nearly level
soils of the
coastal plain--
dominately very
poorly drained.
6. Nearly level
soils of the
coastal plain--
wetlands.
14. Othello-
Ma tapeake-
Mattapex
15. Elkton-
Matawan-
Keyport
16. Pocomoke-
Fallsington-
Evesboro
17. Fallsington-
Pocomoke-
Woodstown
18. Pocomoke-
Fallsington-
Sassafras
19. Tidal marsh-
Coastal beach
20.
Muck-
Pocomoke-
Swamp
21. Tidal fresh-water marsh
*
14.8
12.3
*
*
*
*
*
3.8
*
*
8.9
*
*
6.4
*
*
*
*
*
*
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
S
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
52
-------
FLORIDA
Land Resource
1 freas dominated
ty excessively
drained soils -
soils dominantly
thick acid sands
' f^eas dominated
ty excessively
drained soils -
soils dominantly
tjick neutral to
a|kaline sands.
' f^eas dominated
jy well -drained
to moderately
J6]! drained soils.
t°i's dominantly
:J]ck to moderately
lhlck acid sands.
' freas dominated
y well drained to
Joderately well
f?med soils.
.P1. Is dominantly
rick to thin sands
aJjluenced by
01 "aline materials.
c
/eas dominated
Jwell drained to
J^erately well
&;** soils.
t:!'s dominantly
DhICk to thin
2sPhatic sands
... 'oamy sands
vyAinl » • *» •
•cr lying f -jner-
extured materials.
' bjeas dominated
"lod drained to
d^^tely well
So?!ned S01'ls.
thn:ls dominantly
Sftnn dCld sand to
f "dy loam overlying
Soil Association
1. St. Lucie-
Lakewood-
Pomello
2. Palm Beach-
Cocoa
3. Lakeland-
Eustis-
Blanton
4. Lakeland-
Eustis-
Norfolk
5. Jonesville-
Chiefland-
Hernando
6. Hernando-
Chiefland-
Jonesville
7. Arredondo-
Gainesvi lie-
Fort Meade
8. Hague-
Zuber-
Fellowship
9. Norfolk-
Ruston-
Orangeburg
10. Magnolia-
Faceville-
Tifton
CEC
*
*
*
*
*
2.4
4.8
5.6
2.4
4.8
3.9
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7.5
*
3.9
5.7
7.0
*
7.0
Assoc.
Suscept. Suscept.
Level Rating
S
S S2
SS
S „
SS ^
S
S SI
S
S
S SI
S
NS
NS NS
NS NS
NS
SS
S SSI
SS
NS
SS NS
NS
S
S S2
SS
SS SSI
SS
53
-------
FLORIDA
8.
10.
Areas dominated
by well drained
to moderately well
drained soils.
Soils dominantly
thick to thin acid
sands, some of which
overlie finer-
textured subsoils.
Areas dominated
by somewhat
poorly drained
soils. Soils
dominantly thick
acid sands with
organic pans;
interspersed with
soils without a
pan formation.
Areas dominated
by somewhat poorly
drained soils.
Soils dominantly
thick acid sands
with dark surface
soils.
Areas dominated
by somewhat poorly
drained soils.
Soils dominantly
thick to thin
sands overlying
finer-textured
alkaline materials,
11. Shubuta-
Cuthbert-
Lakeland
12. Kalmia-
Cahaba
13. Blanton-
Klej
14. Kanapaha-
Blanton
15. Rex-
Blanton
16. Blanton-
Bowie
Susquehanna
17. Goldsboro-
Lynchburg
6.8
*
2.4
18.
19.
20.
21
Leon-
Pi ummer-
Rutlege
Leon-
Immokalee-
Pompano
Leon-
Pome! 1 o-
Plummer
Leon-
Blanton-
Plummer
22. Scranton-
Ona
23. Adamsville-
Pompano
24. Sunniland-
Bradenton
25. Panasoffkee-
Bushnell
5.6
*
*
5.6
*
5.6
5.6
2.4
8.9
12.3
6.0
*
*
*
*
6.5
*
*
*
*
5.6
*
*
11.1
*
5.5
*
*
SS
ss
s
ss
ss
s
NS
NS
S
S
S
ss
ss
s
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
S
S
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SSI
SSI
S2
NS
SI
S2
SSI
NS
NS
NS
ssi
NS
NS
NS
NS
52
NS
54
-------
ORIDA
dominated
y Poorly to very
Bftly drained soils
th t dominantly
?lck to thin sand
l° sandy loam
o5lf?ce soils
tevPyin9 finer-
J^red acid
subsoils.
27.
28.
29.
30.
dominated
; po°rly to
• y Poorly
solls-
31.
to
32.
thick
sands to
loams overly-
-textured
materials.
bvejls dominated
Poon°rly ^° very
Soil drained soils.
^ ^S flftm J ». . u j_ 1 . .
33.
Broward-
Parkwood-
Keri
Coxville-
Bladen-
Weston
Leaf-
Bladen-
Rains
PI ummer-
Rutlege
Bayboro-
Portsmouth-
Rains
Pompano-
Charlotte-
Delray
Manatee-
Felda
Perrine-
Ochopee
3.2
12.1
7.1
*
11.0
4.6
15.9
11.0
13.1
*
*
39.9
*
13.1
*
*
19.3
*
5.4
*
S
SS
ss
NS
SS
S
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
S
-
to
thick
dominated 34. Everglades-
to very Brighton-
d0nii'y drained soils- Pamlico
no/^tly peats and
35. Fresh water swamp-
Marsh
36. Tidal Marsh-
Coastal Beach-
Coastal Dunes
37. Rock!and
Cation available. 55
*
*
*
*
*
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SSI
SS2
SS2
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SSI
-------
GEORGIA
Land Resources
1 . Sand Mountain
2. Appalachian
Valleys and
Ridges
3. Blue Ridge
Area
Soil Association
1. Hartsells-
Hector
2. Nella-
Townley
Hector
3. Conasauga-
Lyerly-
Wolftever
4. Shack-
Fullerton-
Bodine (2-10% slopes)
5. Shack-
Full erton-
Bodine (10-60% slopes)
6. Etowah-
Holston-
Rome
7. T own ley -
Cunningham-
Montevallo
8. Townley-
Montevallo-
Cunningham
9. Nella-
Townley-
Hector
10. Cartecay-
Toccoa-
Wehadkee
11. Hayes vi 11 e-
Braddock-
Dyke
CEC
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
21.1
*
8.2
8.7
*
8.2
8.7
8.6
9.5
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
6.6
*
*
Suscept.
Level
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
NS
ss
NS
ss
ss
ss
AssoCj
Suscep1
ssi
-------
BORGIA
12. Saluda- * SS
Hayesville- 6.6 SS SSI
Fannin * SS
13. Hayesville- 6.6 SS
Fannin- * SS SSI
Braddock * SS
14. Hayesville- 6.6 SS
Madison- * SS SSI
Tallapoosa * SS
15. Tallapoosa- * SS
Hayesville- 6.6 SS SSI
Talladega * SS
16. Ashe- * SS
Porters- * $S SSI
Edneyvilie * SS
17. Cartecay- * MS
Toccoa- * SS NS
Wehadkee * MS
18. Transylvania- * SS _
Toxaway * MS
19. Hector- * SS
DeKalb- 17.3 NS SS2
Tallapoosa * SS
Pledrn°nt 20. Cecil- 8.4 SS
Madison- * SS «.«..
Appling- * SS
Gwinnett * $S
21. Pacolet- * $S
Gwinnett- * SS SSI
Madison * $s
22. Tallapoosa- * SS
Grover- * SS SSI
Madison * SS
23. Louisburg- * SS
Louisa- * SS SS2
Wilkes * NS
24. Mountainburg- * SS
Pacolet- * SS SSI
Holston 9.5 SS
25. Helena- * MS
Enon- * SS NS
Iredell * MS
57
-------
GEORGIA
NS
NS
NS
^ • VI hSM I • • II V*«M
5. Sand Hills 29. Lakeland- 2.4 S
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
Iredell-
Wi Ikes-
Mecklenburg
Cartecay-
Toccoa-
Wehadkee
Urban Area
Lakeland-
Troup-
Lucy
Lakeland-
Blaney-
Lucy
Greenville-
Faceville-
Orangeburg
Orangeburg-
Dothan-
Facevi lie-
Lucy
Cowarts-
Sawyer-
Susquehanna
Gi lead-
Norfolk
Vaucluse-
Blaney-
Gilead
Bibb-
Osier-
Meggett-
Rains
Meggett-
Bladen-
Rains
Chewacla-
Wehedkee-
Rains
Dothan-
Tifton-
Fuquay
*
*
*
*
*
*
-
2.4
*
3.4
2.4
*
3.4
11.2
*
7.0
7.0
7.9
*
3.4
*
*
*
*
3.9
*
*
*
*
*
*
13.1
*
11.0
13.1
*
*
13.1
7.9
6.5
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
-
s
SS
s
s
SS
s
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
s
SS
NS
NS
SS
s
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
58
-------
40. Americus- 3.9 S
Lucy- 3.4 S S2
Troup * SS
41. Alley- * SS
Troup- * SS SSI
Vaucluse * SS
Lands 42. Oktibbeha- * NS
Sumter- * NS NS
Susquehanna * NS
Coastal 43. Kershaw- * SS
Lakeland 2.4 S
44. Lakeland- 2.4 S
Troup- * SS S2
Lucy 3.4 S
45. Lakeland- 2.4 S
Blaney- * SS S2
Lucy 3.4 S
46. Lakeland- 2.4 S S2
Surrency * NS
47. Valdosta- * SS
Pel ham- * NS SS2
Lowndes * SS
48. Americus- 3.9 S
Lucy- 3.4 S S2
Troup * SS
49. Cowarts- * SS SS2
Duplin * NS
50. Cowarts- * SS
Duplin- * NS NS
Susquehanna * NS
51. Esto- * SS
Susquehanna- * NS SS2
Cowarts * SS
52. Boswell- * NS
Duplin- * NS NS
Susquehanna * NS
53. Cowarts- * SS
Norfolk- 3.9 S SSI
Wagram * SS
54. Dothan- 7.9 SS
Tifton- 6.5 SS SSI
Fuquay * SS
-------
GEORGIA
55. Cowarts- * ss
Carnegie- * SS
Fuquay * SS
56. Fuquay- * SS
Cowarts- * ss
Troup * SS
57. Troup- * ss
Fuquay
*
58. Wagram- * SS
Lucy- 3.4 S
Troup- * SS
Norfolk 3.9 S
59. Fuquay- * SS
Grady- * NS
Tifton 6.5 SS
60. Gilead- * SS
Norfolk 3.9 S
61. Norfolk- 3.9 S
Cowarts- * SS
Gilead * SS
62. Norfolk- 3.9 S
Tifton- 6.5 SS
Wagram * SS
63. Orangeburg- 7.0 SS
Faceville- * SS
Lucy- 3.4 S
Dothan 7.9 SS
64. Tifton- 6.5 SS
Alapaha- * NS
Norfolk 3.9 S
65. Tifton- 6.5 SS
Grady- * NS
Norfolk 3.9 S
66. Orangeburg- 7.0 SS
Red Bay- 7.0 SS
Norfolk 3.9 S
67. Tifton- 6.5 SS
Greenville- 11. 2 SS
Faceville * SS
68. Orangeburg- 7.0 SS
Faceville * SS
Red Bay 7.0 SS
60
-------
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
Carnegie-
Henderson
Orangeburg-
Facevi lie-
Greenville
Greenville-
Faceville-
Orangeburg
Faceville-
Orangeburg-
Greenville
Vaucluse-
Blaney-
Gilead
Carnegie-
Sawyer-
Tifton
Marlboro-
Tifton-
Dothan
Esto-
Vaucluse-
Boswell
Bladen-
Duplin
Craven-
Wahee-
Congaree
Ardilla-
Wahee-
Ocilla
Leefield-
Stilson-
Pelham
Pelham-
Ocilla
Leefield-
Irvington-
Pelham
*
*
7.0
*
11.2
11.2
*
7.0
*
7.0
11.2
*
*
*
*
*
6.5
4.6
6.5
7.9
*
*
*
11.0
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
it
*
*
*
14.4
*
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
s
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SS2
SSI
SS2
cco
^
NS
NS
NS
MC
NS
NS
*
61
-------
GEORGIA
83. Bibb- * NS
Osier- * NS ^5
Meggett- * NS
Rains 13.1 SS
84. Kinston- * NS
Bibb- * NS NS
Osier * NS
85. Chewacla- * NS
Wehadkee- * NS NS
Rains 13.1 SS
86. Angie- * NS
Meggett- * NS N5
Wahee- * NS
87. Meggett- * NS
Bladen- 11.0 SS $5
Rains 13.1 SS
88. Grady- * NS
Troup- * SS $
Ocilla- * NS
89. Goldsboro- 12.3 SS
Ardilla- * NS &
Rains 13.1 SS
8. Atlantic Coast 90. Tifton- 6.5 SS
Flatwoods Fuquay- * SS Si
Pel ham * NS
91. Cowarts- * SS .
Carnegie- * SS "
Fuquay * SS
92. Lakeland- 2.4 S <
Chipley- * NS ^
Surrency * NS
93. Kershaw- * SS 5$'
Pel ham * NS
94. Leefield- * NS ,
Irvington- • 14.4 SS ^
Pel ham * NS
95. Leefield- * NS ,
Mascotte- * NS &
Pel ham * NS
96. Ocilla- * NS .,
Pel ham- * NS ^
Olustee ,. * NS
£>/
-------
97. Echaw- * SS
Rutlege- * NS NS
Mascotte * NS
98. Mascotte- * NS
Pel ham- * NS NS
Leon * NS
99. Leon- * NS NS
Rutlege * NS
100. Pel ham- * NS
Rains- 13.1 SS NS
Ellabelle * NS
101. Bladen- 11.0 SS SS2
Bayboro 39.9 NS
102. Bladen- 11.0 SS SS2
Duplin * NS
103. Johnston- * NS
Rains- 13.1 SS NS
Ellabelle *. NS
104. Istokpoga- * NS NS
Rutlege- * NS
105. Bayboro- 39.9 NS NS
Rains 13.1 SS
106. Tidal Marsh- * NS NS
Capers * NS
107. Chewacla- * NS
Wehadkee- * NS NS
Rains 13.1 SS
108. Troup- * SS
Fuquay * SS
109. Kinston- * NS
Bibb- * NS NS
Osier * NS
110. Meggett- * NS
Bladen- 11.0 SS SS2
Rains 13.1 SS
111. Tifton- 6.5 SS
Alpaha- * NS SSI
Norfolk 3.9 S
63
-------
ILLINOIS
Land Resources Soil Association
1. Dark-colored soils 1. Joy-
developed primar- Tama-
ily from loess. Muscat! ne-
Ipava-
Sable
2. Sidell-
Catlin-
Flanagan-
Drummer
3. Wenona-
Rutland-
Streator
4. Harrison-
Herri ck-
Virden
5. Oconee-
Cowden-
Piasa
6. Hoyleton-
Cisne-
Huey
2. Dark-colored soils 7. Warsaw-
developed primar- Carmi-
ily from glacial Rodman
drift.
8. Ringwood-
Griswold-
Durand
9. LaRose-
Saybrook-
Lisbon
10. Elliott-
Ashkum-
Andres
1 1 . Swygert-
Bryce-
Clarence-
Rowe
CEC
*
28.1
36.3
*
58.1
*
*
if
•k
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
25.9
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
44.2
*
*
*
*
*
Suscept.
Level
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ss
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
Assoc-
Sucept-
Rating
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS'
uC
NS
_,r
NS
Mc
N-3
, ,f
NS
uC
N5
NS;
64
-------
LLIHOIS
U1?nt-colored
s°ils developed
Primarily from
'oess.
sJSijt-colored
pjls developed
HiQ.1^1 I i. ^*/4*>»vv\
oi : .' i ly Trom
Sldcial drift.
^k-
de °^ed soils
i1ve|oped primar-
^d f-Q[n roedium-
OUIT>I ne-textured
ash.
cSiJf^nd light-
-------
ILLINOIS
8.
Dark-and light-
colored soils
developed primar-
ily from medium-
textured material
on bedrock.
Dark-and light-
colored soils
developed primar-
ily from
alluvium.
25. Channahon-
Dodgeville-
Dubuque-
Derinda
26.
Lawson-
Beaucoup-
Darwin-
Haymond-
Belknap
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
18.9
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
66
-------
"DIANA
3 Resource Soil Association
' Jjjrly level, well 1.
Jja poorly drained,
ppy soils on flood
2.
3.
4.
5.
dJjpy level, poorly 6.
ton d) sandy soils
a organic soils
7.
• III
dJJpy level, poorly 8.
CIned> loamy soils
,]^°utwash and
us trine deposits
9.
10.
^6flvo
-------
INDIANA
12. Patton-
Lyles-
Henshaw
5. Level and sloping,
well-drained, loamy
soils on sandy and
gravelly outwash
deposits
6. Sloping, well-
drained, and nearly
level poorly
drained, sandy
soils
7. Sloping, well-
drained, loamy
soils in Eolian
sand deposits
8. Sloping, well-
drained, silty
soils in loess
9. Nearly level,
poorly drained
silty soils in
loess or loess
and glacial till
13.
14,
15,
19.
20.
Zipp-
Markland-
McGary
Tracy-
Door-
Lydick
Elston-
Shipshe-
Warsaw
16. Oshtemo-
Fox
17.
Fox-
Ockley-
Westland
18. Parke-
Ne.gley
Oakvilie-
Adrian
Plainfield-
.Maumee-
Oshtemo
21. Princeton-
Bloomfield-
Ay rs hi re
22. Alford
23. Ragsdale-
Raub
24. Sable-
Ipava
25. Fincastle-
Ragsdale
26. Reesville-
Ragsdale
44.6
15.2
13.2
25.4
*
18.9
*
*
*
14.8
12.6
25.9
6.3
14.2
14.2
13.6
29.0
15.8
11.4
4.2
51.6
5.5
15.5
6.3
13.1
5.7
7.9
NS
NS
ss
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
ss
NS
SS
SS
ss
SS
NS
NS
SS
S
NS
S
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
15.0
34.8
*
58.1
*
14.5
34.8
15.7
34.8
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
ssi
SSI.
NS
52
ssi
ssi
NS
NS
NS
NS
68
-------
Je^ly level,
?° Ol"ly drained,
?% soils in
91acial till
"early ievel
POOi"! I/ j . * i
ri ' 'y drained,
>• 1 n \/f\\ , » m .
ySV QriT 1 c- -I «
Qlal« ' ' ^ ^ n
9^ciai till
Si
dj ^ng well-
hB ^d, and
h« ly level
POOvl
Soi?y dnd silty
tii]5 1n glacial
.
dy>a • 9 We 11 —
fi^^?e^s and
Po^Jy level
cUy!y drained,
9]Q;^ soils in
C1al till
27. Iva-
Vigo
28. Brookston-
Odell-
Corwin
29. Crosier-
Brooks ton
30. Crosby-
Brooks ton
31. Blount-
Pewamo
32. Hoytville-
Nappanee
33. Parr-
Brooks ton
34. Riddles-
T racy-
Chelsea
35. Mi ami -
C rosier-
Brooks ton -
Riddles
36. Mi ami -
Crosby-
Brooks ton
37. Miami-
Hennepin-
Crosby
38. Miami-
Russell-
Fincastle-
Ragsdale
39. Russell-
Hennepin-
Fincastle
40. Markham-
Elliott-
Pewamo
41. Morley-
Blount-
Pewamo
12.9
12.6
31.3
32.0
*
13.4
31.3
20.3
31.3
20.8
30.6
33.5
28.1
*
31.3
11.7
*
4.9
23.2
13.4
31.3
11.7
23.2
20.3
31.3
23.2
*
20.3
23.2
15.9
14.5
34.8
15.9
*
14.5
*
*
30.6
17.5
20.8
30.6
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
s
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
r c T
SSI
OO 1
NS
SS2
+J *J C.
NS
M w
MC
INo
we
11 0
[\|C
I1J
SSI
SS2
*J
-------
INDIANA
14. Nearly level,
poorly drained
silty soils
with fragipans
15. Sloping, well-
drained, silty
soils with
fragipans
16.
17.
18.
Sloping, well-
drained, silty
soils in loess
and weathered
shale and
sandstone
Sloping, well-
drained, silty
and clayey soils
in loess and
weathered lime-
stone
Steep, well-
drained, shallow
or stony soils in
weathered
sedimentary rocks
42. Bartle-
Peoga-
Dubois
43. Weinbach-
Wheeling
44. Avonburg-
Clermont
45. Hosmer
46. Zanesville-
Wellston-
Tilsit
47. Cincinnati-
Vigo-
Ava
48. Cincinnati-
Rossmoyne
49. Wellston-
Zanesvilie-
Berks
50. Crider-
Bedford-
Lawrence
51. Crider-
Hagerstown-
Bedford
52. Crider-
Baxter-
Corydon
53. Berks-
Gil pin-
Wei kert
54. Corydon-
Weikert-
Berks
55. Eden-
Switzerland
12.7
12.7
12.2
18.8
10.5
12.2
11.6
7.9
15.6
14.2
*
15.6
16.7
14.2
15.6
*
*
13.1
13.2
*
*
*
13.1
30.9
13.6
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
10.4
14.8
12.2
15.2
12.6
*
15.2
14.0
14.8
10.4
13.1
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SSI
NS
SSI
SSI.
ssi
NS
NS
ssi
NS
NS
NS
ssi
SS2
Floodplain
70
-------
urce
Soil Association
Assoc.
CEC Suscept. Suscept.
Level Rating
^P» topll l
drail j
dfa' to poorly
nBI1!?ecl soils on
pljty level flood 2.
tpy.lns anc' undulating
i^ces of the
J0r> streams. 3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
dyjj' Well- 10.
ta,-1^ to poorly
fi\ flfid ^nile
'""led . *
On ^ m loess 11.
"^ly uplands.
12.
Sharkey-
Commerce
Huntington-
Melvin
Falaya-
Henry
Uniontown-
Patton
Belknap-
Karnak
Elk-
Weinback-
Melvin
Wheeling-
Huntington
Pope-
Bonn ie-
Allegheny
Morehead-
Whitley-
Cuba
Memphis-
Loring
Grenada-
Loring
Brandon-
Lori ng-
Saffell
43.8
*
13.9
*
13.4
10.7
13.4
*
*
*
*
*
*
13.7
13.9
*
*
6.8
*
if
*
13.1
12.2
11.5
12.2
*
12.2
*
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
N^
M O
SS2
CC1
OO 1
NS
llO
NS
SS2
SS2
SSI
SSI
SSI
71
-------
KENTUCKY
3. Deep and
moderately deep,
well-drained
soils, formed in
residuum from
acid shales, silt-
stone and sandstone
with most areas
having a thin loess
mantle on hilly
uplands and
undulating broad
ridgetops.
4. Deep, well-
drained soils,
formed in
residuum from
limestone with
most areas having
a thin loess mantle
on undulating to
rolling upland
plains.
5. Deep and
moderately deep,
well-drained
soils formed in
residuum of cherty
or shaly limestone
on hilly upland.
Deep, well-
drained soils on
undulating broad
ridgetops and
moderately deep
or shallow well-
drained soils on
hilly uplands,
formed in
residuum from
limestone or
interbedded shale
and limestone.
13. Zanesville-
Frondorf
14. Caneyville-
Zanesville-
Frondorf
15. Loring-
Wellston
16. Sadler-
Zanesville
17. Riney
18. Crider-
Cumberland
19. Baxter-
Crider
20. Fredonia-
Cumberland
21. Crider-
Vertress
22. Sonora-
Gatton
23. Trimble-
Baxter
24. Garmon-
Frederick
25. Frederick-
Mountview
26. Crider-
Nicholson
27. Lowell-
Fairmont
28. Eden
29. Beasley-
Nicholson
10.4
*
*
10.4
*
12.2
12.7
*
10.4
38.2
16.8
*
SS
ss
NS
SS
ss
ss
ss
NS
SS
ss
11.2
10.2
9.1
11.2
*
10.2
11.2
*
*
*
*
9.1
*
*
*
*
11.2
*
20.1
36.0
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
ss
NS
NS
NS
SS
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
72
-------
deep,
-drained soils
in residuum
creep
from acid
, silt-
and shale on
sides.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
Fairmont-
Fay wood
Nicholson-
Faywood
Maury-
Mcafee
Mcafee-
Fairmont
Otway-
Beasley
Berks-
Cranston
Latham-
Shelocka
Jefferson-
Shelocka
Jefferson
Dekalb
Shelocka-
Brookside
Vandal ia-
Upshur
Colyer-
Rockcastle
Shelocka-
Gilpin
36.0
*
*
*
*
*
*
36.0
32.5
16.8
*
*
*
*
5.5
*
5.5
*
*
*
*
31.4
*
*
*
12.3
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ss
ss
NS
SS
s
ss
s
ss
ss
NS
NS
NS
SS
ss
ss
ss
NS
M*J
NS
IV*J
NS
1 IS/
NS
M«J
NS
11 w
SSI
NS
i^+j
S2
S2
SS2
NS
llw
SSI
w w 1
SSI
ww 1
73
-------
MARYLAND
Land Resource
Soil Association
CEC Suscept. -—-.,
Level Rat1'
1. Soils formed from
consolidated
sedimentary rocks.
A. Areas dominated
by medium-and
moderately coarse-
textured soils on
residuum from
gray, acid shale
and sandstone,
and their
colluvial
associates.
1. Moderately 1. Gilpin-
deep well- Dekalb
drained gent-
ly sloping to
moderately
steep soils.
2. Very shallow 2. Dekalb-
to moderately- Gil pin-
deep excessively- Ernest
to well-drained
sloping to 3. Weikert-
steep soils. Berks
4. Weikert-
Gilpin-
Dekalb
3. Well-and moder- 5. Cookport-
ately well- Gilpin
drained undu-
lating to
rolling soils.
B. Areas dominated
by medium-to
moderately coarse-
textured soils on
residuum from red
and mixed red and
gray, acid shale
and sandstone.
12.3
17.3
17.3
12.3
11.0
12.9
16.9
12,
12,
17.3
7.6
12.3
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
74
-------
MARYLAND
Shallow-to
moderately
deep, exces-
sively-to mod-
erately well-
drained gently
sloping soils.
Shallow to
moderately
deep, exces-
sively- to well-
drained stony
sloping to
steep soils.
6. Penn-
Readington-
Lewisberry
11.3
*
*
8.
Weikert-
Calvin-
Dekalb
Lehew-
Calvin
Lehew-
Calvin-
Dekalb
12.
12.
17.
4.
12.
4.
12.
17.3
°i
Areas dominated
by_medium-textured
soils on residuum
from limestone,
calcareous shale,
and interbedded
'imestone and
shale.
!• Deep well- 10.
drained slop-
ing to slop-
ing soils.
2- Shallow to 11.
moderately
deep, exces-
sively- to well-
drained stony
sloping to
steep soils.
formed from
and meta-
rocks.
dominated
medium-textured
on residuum
basic igneous
metamorphic
Hagerstown-
Duffield
El liber
Corydon
Dekalb
16.8
5.7
15.2
17.3
^
Jeep well- 12.
drained stony
Qently sloping
to stony moder-
ately steep soils.
Highfield-
Fauquier
SS
NS
SS
SS2
SS
SS
NS
S
SS
S
SS
NS
SS2
52
SSI
NS
NS
S
NS
NS
NS
SS2
SS
SS
SSI
75
-------
MARYLAND
13. Myersville-
Fauquier
14. Neshaminy-
Montalto
2. Shallow to 15.
moderately
deep, moder-
ately well-
to somewhat
poorly-drained
gently to
steeply slop-
ing soils.
Areas dominated
by medium-textured
soils on residuum
from acid igneous
and metamorphic
rocks and their
alluvial and
colluvial
associates.
1. Moderately 16.
deep to deep
well-drained
gently sloping
to moderately
steep soils.
2. Shallow to
moderately
deep well-
drained
channery
gently slop-
ing to moder-
ately steep
soils.
3. Shallow to 18.
moderately
deep well-
drained stony
sloping to
steep soils.
4. Deep well- 19.
drained stony
sloping to
steep soils
on colluviurn.
Conowingo-
Aldino-
Chrome
Manor-
Glenelg-
Chester
17. Mt. Airy-
Glenelg-
Linganore
Edgemont-
Chandler-
Dekalb
Braddock-
Thurmont
*
*
14.6
*
*
*
*
13.7
22.2
16.6
*
22.2
*
*
*
17.3
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
*
*
NS
SS
76
-------
MARYLAND
5. Deep well-
drained slop-
ing soils on
old alluvium
over lime-
stone residuum.
* Soils formed from
^consolidated coastal
Plain sediments.
A- Areas dominated by
coarse-textured
soils on sandy
deposits.
Excessively- 21
drained undulating
soils.
B- Areas dominated
by medium-and
moderately coarse-
textured soils on
sandy and silty
deposits.
1. Well-and 22.
moderately
well-drained
undulating
soils.
2. Moderately 23.
well-to-very
poorly-drained
nearly level
soils.
3- Well-drained 24.
rolling to
hilly soils
developed in
glauconitic
deposits.
4- Well-drained 25.
rolling to
hilly soils
developed in
sediments with
little or no
glauconite.
20. Baltimore-
Manor
Lakeland-
Galestown-
Rumford
Sassafras-
Ma tapeake-
Woodstown
Fallsington-
Woodstown-
Othello-
Pocomoke
Collington-
Monmouth
Westphalia-
Marr-
Sassafras-
Evesboro-
*
13.7
*
6.1
*
6.4
14.8
8.9
*
8.9
*
*
17.1
*
4.3
*
6.4
3.8
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SSI
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SSI
NS
NS
S
SS
SS
S
S2
77
-------
MARYLAND
5. Well-arid
26. Beltsville-
moderately
well-drained
(with a fragi-
pan) undulat- 27.
ing to rolling
soils.
28.
Areas dominated
by medium-to
moderately fine-
textured soils on
silty and clayey
deposits.
1. Well-and mod-
erately well-
drained undu-
lating soils.
2, Moderately
well-to poor-
ly-drained
nearly level
soils.
3. Poorly-and
very poorly-
drained nearly
level soils.
31
Caroline-
Leonardtown
Beltsvilie-
Chill um-
Croom
Beltsvilie-
Sassafras
29. Matapeake-
Mattapex-
Butlertown
30.
Othello-
Elkton-
Mattapex-
Keyport
Othello-
Portsmouth
Areas dominated by
medium-and moderately
coarse-textured soils
on vari-colored sandy,
silty, and clayey
deposits.
Well-drained
undulating to
rolling soils.
E. Areas affected
by tidal waters.
Soils formed from
alluvial materials.
Areas dominated by
soils developed on
flood plains and
associated terraces.
32. Christiana-
Sunnyside-
Sassafras
33. Tidal marshes
Sand dunes
Coastal Beaches
*
*
*
*
*
*
6.4
14.8
12.3
*
*
*
12.3
*
*
*
*
6.4
*
*
*
SS
ss
NS
SS
SS
ss
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
78
-------
Both well-and 34. Pope- 3.0 S
poorly-drained Hoston- * ss
soils. Comus- * SS SSI
Elk- * SS
Bibb * NS
79
-------
LOUISIANA
Land Resource
1. Coastal Plain
2. Mississippi
Terrace and
Loess ial Hills
3. Flatwoods
Soil Association
1 . Ruston-
Bowie-
Orangeburg-
Beauregard
2. Shubuta-
Kirvin-
Nacogdotches-
Luverne
3. Susquehanna-
Boswell-
Sawyer
4. Memphis-
Loring-
Grenada-
Calloway
5. Lexington-
Providence-
Bude
6. Lintonia-
Richland-
Olivier-
Calhoun
7. Caddo-
Beauregard-
Hammond-
Wrightsville
CEC
5.7
2.4
7.0
*
6.8
*
*
*
•*
*
*
13.1
12.2
11.5
13.3
9.2
11.0
9.7
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Suscept.
Level
S
S
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
-
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
-
NS
Suscept
Rating
S2
o t.
SSI
W w 1
NS
SSI
vv 1
SSI
NS
1 1 «J
NS
4. Coastal Prairies
5. Recent Alluvium
8. Crowley-
Midland-
Lake Charles
9. Baldwin-
Cypremorf-
Iberia
*
*
*
*
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
_
NS
NS
NS
80
-------
L°UISIANA
10. Commerce- * NS
Mhoon- * NS
Robinsvilie- * SS
Crevasse * S
11. Sharkey- 43.8 NS
Tunica- * NS NS
Swamp clays * NS
12. Yahola- . * NS
Miller- * NS MC
Norwood- * NS Nb
Perry * NS
13. Gallion- * NS
Pulaski- * SS wc.
Perry- * NS Mb
Portland * NS
14. Sharkey- 43.8 NS
Gall ion- * NS N-
Perry- * NS N:>
Hebert * NS
15. Bibb- * NS
Ochlockonee- * SS M-
Chastain- * NS ^
Waverly * NS
5, *
w°astal Marsh 16. Marsh peats, mucks, clays- * NS
Harris- * NS NS
Palm Beach * S
81
-------
MAINE
Land Resource
Soil Association
CEC Suscept.
Level
1. Areas dominated 1. Bangor-
by loamy soils on Dixmont-
glaciated uplands Thorndike
2. Easton-
Burnham-
Thorndike
3. Telos-
Coffeelos-
Monson
4. Chesuncook-
Telos.
Monson
5. Monardo-
Burnham-
Dixmont
6. Caribou-
Mapleton-
Conant
7. Perham-
Daigle
8. Thorndike-
Howland-
Plaisted
9. Peru-
Marl ow-
Lyman
10. Berkshire-
Peru-
Lyman
11. Ridgebury-
Peru-
Histosols
25.7
16.0
*
26.5
11.3
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
15.0
11.3
16.0
25.2
*
26.7
24.7
20.5
*
*
21.7
20.9
27.1
*
25.8
20.9
*
14.7
20.9
*
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS2
SS2
NS
NS
SS2
NS
MC
llO
SS2
SS2
SS2
SS2
82
-------
dominated by
and gravely
s°ils on glacial
Jjutwash plains,
aeltas, terraces
*nd eskers; and
Wet organic soils.
dominated by
loamy soils
glacial till and
and clayey
•,01's on marine and
acustrine sediments.
dominated by
ent alluvium.
12. Lyman-
Histosols-
Rock outcrop
13. Hermon-
Lyman-
Peru
14. Colton-
Adams-
Histosols
15. Lyman-
AuGres-
Histosols
16. Masardis-
Adams-
Histosols
17. Lyman-
Scantic-
Peru
18. Creasey-
Buxton-
Scantic
19. Scantic-
Peru-
Marlow
20. Buxton-
Salmon-
Nicholville
21. Scantic-
Histosols-
Buxton
22. Scantic-
Buxton-
Adams
23. Ondawa-
Podunk
*
*
*
26.8
*
20.9
*
*
*
*
11.2
*
*
*
*
*
*
20.9
*
20.5
*
*
20.9
27.1
20.5
*
*
*
*
20.5
*
20.5
*
6.33
14.5
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SSI
SS2
SSI
SSI
SS2
SS2
SS2
NS
NS
NS
NS
SSI
pc-«
LEC
available
influenced
83
-------
MAINE
15
16
Series
rs.1. Adams Sandy, mixed frigid
2. AuGres Sandy, mixed, frigid
-.3. Colton Sandy-skeletal, mixed, frigid
4. Croghan Sandy, mixed, frigid
5. Duane Sandy-skeletal, mixed, frigid,
ortstein
•6. Masardis Sandy-skeletal, mixed, frigid
7. Stetson Sandy-skeletal, mixed, frigid
Family
Typic Haplorthods
Entic Haplaquods
Typic Haplorthods
Aquic Haplorthods
Typic Haplorthods
Typic Haplorthods
Typic Haplorthods
Order
Spodosol
Spodosol
Spodosol
Spodosol
Spodosol
Spodoso1
Spodosol
14
Colton-Adams-Histosol
Croghan
Duane
Machias
Madawosksa
Allagash
15
Lyman-AuGres-Histosol
Adams
Croghan
Buxton
Saugatuck
Scantic
Biddeford
84
-------
Parent material of the soil catena and
selected characteristics of the deepest,
best drained member.
Excessively
Drained
Somewhat
Excessively
Drained
Veil
Drained
Moderately
Well
Drained
Somewhat
Poorly
Drained
Poorly
Drained
Very
Poorly
Drained
00
Ul
Soils from coarse watersorted material of
glacial outwash deltas, terraces and beaches
1. Granite, gneiss and some sandstone
a. sandy-skeletal gravelly soils Colton
b. sandy soils Adams
c. sandy soils with cemented
spodic horizon
2. Slate, shale, and phyllite and lesser
amounts of granite, gneiss, and
limestone
a. sandy-skeletal gravelly soils
1. > 42 cm of coarse loamy cap
2. < 42 cm of coarse loamy cap
b. fine sandy loam
c. sandy soils
Duane
Croghan
AuGres
Saugatuck ->-
Scarboro
Scarboro
Stetson
Masardis
Machias Fredon •*•
Allagash Madawaska Red Hook Atherton
Skowhegon ->
Halsey
-------
MASSACHUSETTS
Land Resource Soi
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
1 Association
Nassau-
Bernards ton-
Pitts town
Amenia-
Pittsfield-
S toe kb ridge
Lyman-
Marlow-
Peru
Westminster-
Buckland-
Colrain
Paxton-
Hollis-
Canton
Holyoke-
Hollis-
Wethersfield
Hinckley-
Wethersfield-
Windsor
Hadley-
Winooski-
Limerick
Hinckley-
Windsor-
Muck
Windsor-
Pol lux-
Amos town
Scituate-
Essex-
Ridgebury
Gloucester-
Peat-
Hinckley
CEC Suscept.
Level
*
*
*
18.1
12.8
15.1
*
27.1
20.9
22.7
*
14.0
21.8
*
*
*
*
*
7.4
*
6.0
11.8
19.6
*
7.4
6.0
*
6.0
*
*
17.0
13.2
14.6
12.1
*
7.4
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
S
SS
NS
NS
SS
S
NS
S
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
Assoc.
Suscept.
Rating
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
NS
SSI
NS
SSI
NS
SS2
SS2
86
-------
^SACHUSETTS
13. Hinckley- 7.6 SS
Canton- * SS SS2
Muck * NS
14. Canton- * SS
Paxton- 18.0 NS NS
Merrimac 41.o NS
15. Scantic- * NS
Hoi 1 is- * SS NS
Biddeford * NS
16. Canton- * SS
Plymouth- * S SSI
Carver 8.7 SS
17. Carver- 8.7 SS
Muck- * NS SS2
Hinckley 7.6 SS
18. Dukes- 2.4 S
Carver- 8.7 SS SSI
Tidal marsh * NS
19. Evesboro- 3.8 S
Riverhead- * SS SSI
Katama * SS
20. Dune land- * SS
Tidal marsh- * NS NS
Coastal beach * NS
21. Plymouth- * S
Chilmark- * NS SSI
Nantucket * SS
22. Millis- * SS
Whitman- * NS NS
Scituate 17.0 NS
87
-------
MICHIGAN
Southern Peninsula
Land Resource
1 . Parent drift,
clays, surface
horizons are
silt loam and
loam, well drained
and intermediate
drainage.
2. Loams, parent
drift-clay, or
coarse previous
well drained.
3. Sandy loams, loams,
parent drift-
sandy clay.
Soil Association
1 . Napanee-
St. Clair (Miami)
Conover
2. Mi ami -
Napanee-
Conover
3. Kent-
Allendale-
Isabella
4. Isabella-
Montcalm-
Kent
5. Nester-
losco-
Emmet
6. Selkirk-
Ogemaw-
Bergland
7. St. Clair (Napanee)
Miami-
Hillsdale-
Allendale
8. Mi ami -
Hillsdale-
Conover
9. Onaway-
Emmet
10. Onaway-
Posen-
Longrie
11. Hillsdale-
Miami-
•Bellefontaine
CEC
28.1
*
*
17.0
28.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
5.0
*
*
*
*
17.0
*
*
17.0
*
*
15.1
5.0
15.1
-
*
*
17.0
-
Suscept.
Level
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
S
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
S
NS
-
NS
NS
NS
-
Assoc.
Suscept
Rating
NS
NS
NS
SS2
NS
NS
NS
1 1*J
NS
NS
NS
NS
88
-------
MICHIGAN
Southern Peninsula
Sandy loams,
plains, sands or
sandgravel
substratum.
5. Fine sands,
silts, clay plains
dry and wet.
6. Sands,
Hilly land
12. Bellefontaine-
Hillsdale-
Coloma
13. Montcalin-
Co loma-
Isabella
14. Emmet-
Roselawn
15. Montcalm-
Isabella
16. Emmet-
Onaway-
Ogemaw-
Kalkaska
17. Fox-
Osthemo-
Plainfield
18. Fox-
Plainfield-
Hillsdale-
Bellefontaine
19. Ogemaw-
Rubicon-
Nester
20. Warsaw
21. Bohemian-
Selkirk
22. Berrien-
Pi ainfield-
Allendale-
Wauseon-
Granby
23. Berrien-
Tuscola-
Lacota-
Brookston
24. Coloma-
Hillsdale-
Bellefontaine
*
*
*
*
*
*
25.9
*
*
5.5
•*
*
*
*
*
31.3
*
*
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
S
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SSI
5.0
*
*
*
5.0
15.1
*
*
14.2
6.3
5.5
14.2
5.5
*
*
*
*
S
ss
ss
S
NS
NS
SS
ss
ss
S
ss
S
NS
NS
SS
NS
SSI
SSI
SS2
SSI
SS2
NS
NS
SS2
NS
NS
SSI
89
-------
MICHIGAN
Southern Peninsula
7. Sands, dry
plains
8. Sand dunes
9. Intermediate
drainage loams,
silt loams-
underlaid by
till clay.
10. Wetland, clays,
1oams, silt 1oams,
underlaid by
clay.
25. Roselawn-
Emmet-
Rubi con
26. Wexford
Emmet-
Kalkaska
27. Coloma-
Montcalm
28. Plainfield-
29. Kalkaska-
Rubicon
30. Grayling-
Rubicon
31. Bridgman (Dunes)
32. Conover-
Hillsdale-
Miami
33. Conover-
Miami-
Brookston
34. Coldwater-
Conover-
Brookston
35. Crosby-
Conover-
Miami
36. Isabella-
Conover-
Allendale
37. Bergland-
Munuscong-
Selkirk
38. Brookston
39. Thomas
Wisner-
Bono-
Toledo
40. Macomb-
Brookston
90
5.0
*
*
5.0
*
*
*
5.5
*
*
*
*
*
*
17.0
*
17.0
31.3
*
31.3
20.3
*
17.0
*
*
*
*
*
*
31.3
*
*
*
*
31.3
S
SS
S
SS
SS
SS
S
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
y>'
ss'
ss'
si
ss'
55'
,
0
*
t
i
t
i
i
-------
em Peninsula
Intermediate
, loams,
S1H loams, clay,
j>andy loam, lake-
plains
land
loams
41 . Conover-
Napanee-
Brookston
42. Kawkawlin
Conover-
Brookston
43.
44.
45.
Munuscong-
Detour-
Alpena-
Rubicon
Brady-
Gil ford-
Fox-
Plainfield
Macomb-
Allendale-
Berrien
46. Munuscong-
Ogemaw-
Bergland
47. Bruce-
Brimley-
Munuscong-
Selkirk
48. Alluvial Soils-
Undifferentiated
49. Saugatuck-
Plainfield-
Newton-
Wea re-
Wall ace
50. Newton-
Saugatuck-
Rubicon
51. Colwood-
Wauseon-
Berrien
52. Newton-
Gran by-
Ma umee-
Plainfield-
Lacota
91
*
28.1
31.3
*
*
31.3
*
*
*
*
*
*
14.2
5.5
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
5.5
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
15.5
5.5
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
S
NS
NS
-
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
—
-
NS
S
NS
_
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
-
NS
NS
NS
S
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
-------
MICHIGAN
Southern Peninsula
14. Peats, Mucks
Northern Peninsula
15. Silt Clay
Well drained
and intermediate
drainage
53. Newton-
Saugatuck-
Munuscong-
Bergland-
Rifle Peat
54. Eastport
55. Eastport (Stony and bedrock
land)
56. Carlisle-
Rifle
57. Rlfle-
Carbondale-
Greenwood
58. Ontonagon-
Watton-
Bohemian-
Au Train
59. Ontonagon-
Bergland
16. Well drained 60.
(Including variable
amounts of wet land),
Loams, Silt loams,
(Subsurface drift 61.
sand, clay, rock
meal, and coarse
detritus.)
62.
63.
64.
Onaway-
Posen-
Emmet
Onaway-
Trenary-
Angelica-
Carbondale
Munising-
Skanee-
Onota-
Strongs
Iron River-
Gogebic-
Ahmeek
Iron River-
Skanee-
Adolph-
Watton
*
*
*
15.1
*
5.0
15.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
36.7
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
ss
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
-
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
92
-------
North
ern Peninsula
loam,
Sands,
Well
65. Kennan-
Iron River
Gaastra-
Stambaugh
66. Baraga-
Champion-
Kennan-
Iron River
67. Iron River-
Goebic-
Amasa-
Stambaugh
68. Onaway-
Emmet-
Trenary
69. Munising-
Trenary
70. Munising-
Hiawatha
71
72.
74.
Gogebic-
Hiawatha-
Vi las-
Iron River
Blue Lake-
Kalkaska-
Trenary
73. Hiawatha-
Munising-
Champion
Baraga
Trenary-
Gogebic-
Hiawatha-
Vilas
75. Emmet-
Onaway-
Rose lawn
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
15.1
5.0
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
S
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS2
SS2
SS2
SSI
SS2
NS
SSI
SS2
ceo
*
*
5.0
15.1
S
NS
SS2
93
-------
MICHIGAN
Northern Peninsula
18. Sand,
Sandy loams
Hill land.
19. Silt and
Sands
20. Sands,
Sandy Loams,
Plains, Benches,
Well-drained.
21. Sands, Silt,
Clay
22. Sands, Driest
Sites
23. Dunes
24. Rock Land (Igneous
and metamorphic
rocks), Hill,
Mountainous
Topography
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
Vi las-
Hi awatha-
Gogebic-
Rubicon
Hiawatha-
Muni sing
Stambaugh-
Rubi con-
All ouez
Strongs-
Au Train
Strongs-
Muni si ng-
Au Train-
All ouez
Kalkaska
Au Train-
Rubicon
Menominee-
Ingalls-
Bohemian
Bohemian-
Au Train-
Rubicon
Rubicon-
Omega-
Onomia
Rubicon-
Grayling
Sauble-
Deer Park-
Bridgman
Iron River-
Gogebic-
Vilas (Rock Knob highland)
Champion-
Baraqa (Mountainous land)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
9.7
7.0
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ss
-
NS
SS
—
SS
ss
SS
SS
_
-
_
SS
-
SS
SS
_
SS
SS
NS
SS
_
-
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
_
SS
-
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
94
-------
MICHIGAN
ern Peninsula
' Mixed dry
and wet.
and
bed
(Rock at
ow depths;
Wable textures
lr> soils)
clay
90. Muni sing-
Hi awatha-
Vilas (Mountainous land)
*
*
*
91. Iron River- *
Watton- *
Ontonagon (Copper Range highland)*
92. Munising-
Stongs-
Allouez-
Ahmeek (Keewenaw Highland
and Isle Royale)
93. Iron River-
Gogebic (Porcupine Mountains)
94. Iron River-
Gogebic (Granite Knob and
swampland)
95. Onota-
Munising
96. Chatam-
Longrie-
Alpena-
Ruse
97. Gilchrist-
Longrie-
Blue Lake-
Onaway
98. Detour-
Johnswood-
Onaway-
Ontonagon-
Carbondale
99. Trenary-
Blue Lake-
Ogemaw-
Longrie-
Carbondale Muck
100. Munising-
On tonagon-
Bergland-
Munuscong Types (Sugar-Neebish
Islands)
95
*
*
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
15.1
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
*
*
15.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
NS
SS2
NS
NS
SSI
SSI
SSI
NS
SSI
NS
-------
MICHIGAN
Northern Peninsula
28. Wet land,
Loams, Silts,
Sandy loams.
29. Wet land,
Clay
30. Wet land sands
31. Sands (Wet and
Dry) Peats
32. Peats
Mucks
101. Bruce-
Brimley-
Munuscong-
Ontonagon
102. Skanee-
Munising
103. Ewen and Pelkie (Alluvial Soils)
104. Bergland-
Munuscong-
Ontonagon
105. Angelica-
Trenary-
Onaway-
Carbondale
106. Eastport-
Shelldrake (Coastal
lowland complex)
107. Newton-
Saugatuck
Rubicon
108. Newton
Saugatuck-
Rubicon-
Wall ace-
Greenwood-
Houghton Peats
109. Peats and Mucks
*
*
*
*
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ss
*
*
*
*
*
15.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
55!
NS
96
-------
Resource Soil Association
AT & •
' 1 I SO 1 Q
1 Wet soils 1. Guy ton-
Rose!! a-
Bassfield
2. Dundee-
Dubbs
3. Dundee-
Fores tdale-
Dubbs
4. Forestdale-
Alligator
p
' Moist soils 5. Loring-
Grenada-
Falaya
6. Loring-
Smithdale-
Providence
7. Providence-
Bude
8. Providence-
Ora-
Arkabutla
9. Providence-
Ruston-
Bude
10. Dubbs-
Dundee
11. Kipling-
Leeper-
Eutaw
12. Kipling-
Savannah-
Oktibbeha
CEC
*
*
16.7
17.1
16.7
*
17.1
*
52.6
12.2
11.5
13.4
12.2
it
11.0
n.o
9.7
n.o
6.4
*
n.o
5.7
9.7
17.1
16.7
*
*
41.4
*
8.0
*
Suscept.
Level
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
S
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
Assoc.
Suscept.
Rating
NS
AI {*•
NS
NS
MC
NS
SSI
SSI
^ f* T
SSI
SS2
SSI
KI t*
NS
NS
NS
97
-------
MISSISSIPPI
13. Longview- * NS
Savannah- 8.0 SS
Falkner 16.7 NS
14. Memphis- 13.1 SS
Loring- 12.2 SS
Matchez * SS
15. Oktibbeha- * NS
Ora 6.4 SS
16. Vaiden- 38.7 NS
Eutaw- 41.1 NS
Sumter * NS
17. Wilcox- 28.6 NS
Falkner- 16.7 NS
Mayhew * NS
18. Falkner- 16.7 NS
Adaton- * NS
Mayhew * NS
19. Freestone- * NS
Cadeville * NS
Susquehanna * NS
20. Susquehanna- * NS
Benndale * SS
B. Entisols
1. Wet soils 21. Arkabutla- * NS $
Rosebloom- * NS
Urbo * NS
22. Arkabutla- * NS $
Rosebloom- * NS
Velda * SS
23. Commerce- * NS H$
Robinsonville- * SS
Crevasse, frequently flooded * NS
24. Commerce- * NS f|5
Tunica- * NS
Bowdre * NS
25. Falaya- 13.4 SS
Collins- 10.5 SS
Waverly * NS
26. Gillsburg- * NS
Ariel- * SS
Arkabutla * NS
98
-------
27. Mantachie-
Cahaba-
Myatt
28. Rosebloom-
Gillsburg-
Ariel
«
'• Moist soils 29. Nugent-
Harleston-
Smithton
30. Morganfield-
Adler
hj
'Stosols 31. Handsboro-
Tidal Marsh
IncePtisols
' Wet soils 32. Alligator
33. Alligator-
Forestdale
34. Leeper-
Catalpa
35. Sharkey
36. Sharkey-
Alli gator
37. Sharkey-
Commerce, frequently flooded
38. Sharkey-
Tunica
' Moi'st soils 39. Jena-
Mantachie-
Kirkville
n soils 40. Leaf-
Lenoir
41. Atmore-
Harleston-
Plummer
42. Trebloc
Mantachie-
Latonia
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
52.6
52.6
*
*
*
43.8
43.8
52.6
43.8
*
43.8
*
*
*
*
15.9
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
NS
NS
MC
No
MC
No
NS
MC
INo
MC
INo
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
99
-------
MISSISSIPPI
2. Moist soils 43. Prentiss- 5.4 S
Cahaba- * SS
Stough 8.1 SS
44. Savannah- 8.0 SS
Ora- 6.4 SS
Stough 8.1 SS
45. Savannah- 8.0 SS
Susquehanna- * NS
Falkner 16.7 NS
46. Lauderdale- * SS
Arundel- * SS
Sweatman * SS
47. Latonia- * SS
Alaga- * SS
Bibb * NS
48. Sweatman- * SS
Boswell * NS
49. Eustis- 4.8 S
Latonia- * SS
Lakeland- 2.8 S
50. Harleston- * NS
Lenoir- * NS
Atmore * NS
51. McLaurin- * SS
Benndale- * SS
Lucedale * SS
52. McLaurin- * SS
Lucy- 3.4 S
Troup * SS
53. McLaurin- * SS
Prentiss- 5.4 S
Freestone * NS
54. McLaurin- * SS
Ruston- 5.7 S
Saucier * NS
55. McLaurin- * SS
Susquehanna- * NS
Alaga * SS
56. McLaurin- * SS
Sweatman * SS
10Q
-------
IPPI
57. Poarch- * SS
Atmore- * NS NS
Harleston * NS
58. Ruston- 5.7 S
Mai bis- * SS SSI
Susquehanna * NS
59. Ruston- 5.7 S
Ora- 6.4 SS SSI
Smithdale * SS
60. Saucier- * NS
Poarch- * SS NS
Atmore * NS
61. Smithdale- * SS
Atwood * NS
62. Smithdale- * SS
Cadeville- * NS NS
Lexington * NS
63. Smithdale- * SS
Cadeville- * NS SS2
Providence 11.0 SS
64. Smithdale- * SS
Lexington- * NS SS2
Providence 11.0 SS
65. Smithdale- * SS
Susquehanna * NS
66. Smithdale- * SS
Sweatman- * SS SSI
Ora 6.4 SS
67. Smithdale- * SS
Sweatman- * SS SSI
Providence 11.0 SS
68. Smithdale- * SS
Sweatman- * SS SSI
Saffell * SS
6|"tisols 69. Okolona- * NS
Vaiden- * NS NS
Leeper * NS
101
-------
NEW JERSEY
I •» i
Land Resources Soil Association CEC Suscept. SusccP'
Level Rat!"'
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Penn-
Klinesville
Norton-
Penn
Pattenburg-
Arendtsville
Edneyvi lie-
Parker
Parsippany-
Landsdowne-
Whippany
Washington
Wassaic-
Bartley
Rownland-
Birdsboro
Dunellen-
Ellington
Hazen-
Riverhead-
Urban land
Carlisle-
Swamp
Annandale-
Califon-
Washington
Swartswood-
Nassau-
Wurtsboro
Oquaga-
Rock outcrop-
Swartswood
11.3
*
*
11.3
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
ssi
ssi
NS
NS
N5
ftiC
pi*
NS
S*
NS
NS
NS
SS'
552
102
-------
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
Nassau-
Bath
Rockaway-
Hibernia
Rockaway-
Rock Outcrop
Boonton-
Haledone
Holyoke-
Rock Outcrop
Nixon
Neshaminy-
Mount Lucas
Chalfont-
Quakertown-
Hazelton-
Lehigh
Penn-
Bucks-
Reaville
Rown land-
Birds bo ro
Metapeake-
Mattapex-
Chillum
Galestown-
Downer-
Klej-
Evesboro
Alluvial land-
Shrewsbury-
Pocomoke
Aura-
Sassafras-
Downer
Keyport-
Elkton
Freehold-
Collington-
Holmdel
*
17.8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
14.6
*
*
*
8.4
*
11.3
*
*
*
*
14.8
12.3
*
*
6.9
*
3.8
*
*
*
6.3
6.4
6.9
*
*
13.6
17.1
1s
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
*»
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
s
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS2
w *J u»
SS2
SSI
NS
Hij
NS
I1*J
NS
SS2
\J+J L.
NS
n*->
NS
MC
no
SSI
SSI
w W 1
NS
SSI
MC
liO
NS
103
-------
NEW JERSEY
30. Downer- 6.9 SS ,
Sassafras- 6.4 SS Sb
Hammonton 7.1 SS
31. Marl ton- * NS M(.
Kresson- * NS "5
Colemantown * NS
32. Westphalia- 4.3 S $2
Nixonton * SS
33. Lakewood- * SS -<•]
Lakehurst- * NS b
Evesboro 3.8 S
34. Woodmansie- * SS ,52
Lakehurst- * NS *
Downer 6.9 SS
35. Muck- * NS Nc
Atsion- * NS "
Pocomoke * NS
36. Tidal Marsh * NS ^
37. Hammonton- 7.1 SS
Woodstown- 8.9 SS
Sassafras 6.4 SS
38. Coastal Beach- * NS
Urban land * NS
104
-------
^sources Soil Association
S*_
i'jtal Till 1.
1 ?Pludalfs
d°minant
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
' 'Jftradalfs 7.
d°«iinant
8.
9.
1 1
/agiudalfs 10.
On»inant
'^agiaqualfs 11.
"otoinant
don>inant
13.
14.
15.
1 Jjtrochrepts 16.
17.
18.
19.
Cazenovia-
Mohawk
Hilton
Honeoye
Lansing
Madrid
Ontario
Appleton
Burdett-
Darien
Ovid
Langford
Erie
Nellis
Farming ton
Hogansburg-
Swanton
Pittsfield-
Rhinebeck
Char! ton
Muskingum
Lordstown-
Mardin
Hollis
CEC Suscept.
Level
* NS
* NS
14.9 SS
* NS
15.6 NS
* NS
* NS
* NS
* NS
* NS
* NS
19.82 NS
* NS
* NS
* NS
* NS
* NS
12.8 SS
* NS
14.3 SS
8.1 SS
* NS
23.7 NS
* SS
Assoc.
Suscept.
Rating
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
.NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
SSI
NS+
NS
SSI
105
-------
NEW YORK
Dw. Haplaquepts
dominant
E. Fragiochrepts
dominant
Ew. Fragiquods
and frigid
Fragiaquepts
dominant
F. Haplorthods,
Fragiorthods or
very stony
Fragiaquods
domi nant
Fw. Fragiaquods
and frigid
Fragiaquepts
dominant
20. Lordstown-
Oquaga
21 Nassau
22. Charlton-
Paxton
Essex (very stony)
23. Fremont-
Hornell
24. Bath
25. Ira
26. Lackawanna
27. Mardin
28. Sodus
29. Bernardston-
Nassau
30. Bernardston-
Hoosic
31. Lackawanna-
Wurtsboro (very stony)
32. Mosherville
33. Volusia
34. Empeyville
35. Becket-
Berkshire-
Potsdam (very stony)
36. Westbury-
Coveytown (very stony)
37. Worth (very stony)
38. Camroden
39. Westbury-
Brayton
*
*
*
14.3
20.2
13.2
*
*
17.8
*
25.2
23.7
15.3
*
*
*
*
25.2
*
*
*
29.4
*
*
23.6
*
*
*
45.5
*
*
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
$
551
551
IJ5
N5
N5
0
1)5
*
$
$
0
' j
"
$
$
J5
'*
U5
$
V
106
-------
Outwash
Deltiac Sand
1 "ystrochrepts
dominant
(id
' Udipsamments,
sandy skeletal
Dystrochrepts
40. Chenango-
Blasdell
41 . Haven-
Riverhead
42. Chenango-
Valois
Howard-
Madrid
43. Alton-
Hoosjc
or loamy skeletal 44. Colonie-
Eutrochrepts Plymouth-
dominant Windsor
' psammaquents
°r Haplaquepts
dominant
' [japludolfs
d°minant
' (japlorthods
dominant
^ u
^aploquods
Dominant
Sgj. ^nd Marine
'^Pludolfs
H^9iochrepts
foi'nant
l|»-
^chradalfs
*}? Haplaquepts
dominant
45. Plymouth-
Montauk
46. Minoa-
Stafford
47. Arkport
48. Howard
49. Palmyra
50. Col ton-
Adams
51 . Naumburg
52. Col lamer
53. Schoharie
54. Williamson-
Ira
55. Hudson
56. Canandaigua
57. Kingsbury
58. Niagara
17.9 NS
* NS
* NS
* SS
17.9 NS
* NS
* SS
* ss
* NS
* SS
9.9 SS
* S
* S
* S
* S
* SS
* S
10.6 SS
* NS
* NS
* SS
* SS
* S
* NS
* NS
17.5 NS
* NS
* NS
* NS
* NS
19.94 NS
NS
SS2
SS2
r*f*o
SS2
S2
CT
5 1
CC T
SSI
SSI
NS
NS
SSI
SI
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
107
-------
NEW YORK
4. Organic Deposits
M. Histosols
dominant
5. Misc. Units
R. Rock outcrop
dominant
U. Unclassified
Soil
59. Odessa-
Rhinebeck
60. Swanton-
Rhinebeck
61. Kingsbury-
Hogansburg
62. Kingsbury-
Rock outcrop
63. Carlisle-
Palms
64. Rock Outcrop
(sloping)
65. Rock Outcrop
(steep)
66. Beach-
Tidal Marsh
67. Urban Land
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ss
NS
NS
NS
*
*
*
*
NS
NS
SS
ss
NS
NS
NS
* No CEC available
0 Bottomland
Lime influenced
108
-------
CAROLINA
Resource Soil Association
••—
^ Ridge 1.
Stains
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
^thern 8.
64mont
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Ashe-
Evard
Porters-
Edneyville
Ports-
As he
Talledega-
Saluda-
Sylco
Hayes vi 11 e-
Fannin
Hayes vi 11 e-
Cl i f ton-
Rabun
Hayes vi 11 e-
Saluda
Enon-
Wilkes
Mecklenburg-
I rede 11
Wilkes-
Helena
White Store-
Creedmoor
Mayodan
Creedmoor
Cecil-
Appling-
Pacolet
Appling-
Durham-
Vance
Georgeville-
Herndon
CEC
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
6.6
*
6.6
*
*
6.6
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
8.4
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Suscept.
Level
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
Assoc.
Suscept
Rating
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SS2
MC
Nb
hi f*
NS
MC*
NS
SS2
SSI
SSI
SSI
109
-------
NORTH CAROLINA
16. Wedowee- * SS
Durham- * SS $$1
Louisburg * SS
17. Davidson- * SS 55!
Hiwassee * SS
18. Pacolet- * SS c$1
Rock land * SS
19. Davidson- * SS $$1
Enon * SS
20. Helena * NS M$
Vance * SS
21. Nason- * SS $$1
Tatum * SS
22. Nason- * SS •.»
Goldston- * SS $S
Lignum * NS
23. Pacolet- * SS Cl
Madison- * SS $
Hiwassee * SS
24. Lockhart * SS s$1
25. Appling- * $S ,1
Wedowee- * SS "
Louisburg * SS
3. Southern Coastal 26. Lakeland- 2.4 S -i
Plain Gilead- * SS $S
Blaney * SS
27. Lakeland- 2.4 S
Norfolk- 3.9 s S
Wagram * SS
28. Norfolk- 3.9 S $1
Lakeland 2.4 S
29. Norfolk 3.9 S $1
30. Norfolk- 3.9 S $1
Lynchburg 6.0 S
31. Aycock- * SS
Marlboro 4.5 S
110
-------
CAROLINA
'twoods
Coast
32. Norfolk-
Goldsboro-
Marlboro
33. Marlboro-
Norfolk
34. Aycock-
Marlboro-
Nahunta
35. Norfolk-
Wagram
36. Goldsboro-
Lynchburg
37. Norfolk-
Goldsboro
38. Roanoke-
Wahee-
Wickham
39. Wickham-
Altavista
40. Pactolus-
Johns ton
41. Ponzer-
Pamlico-
Dorovan
42. Capers-
Newhan
43. Chipley-
Lynn Haven-
Leon
44. Wehadkee-
Roanoake
45. Chewacla-
Wehadkee
46. Lakeland-
Kenansville
47. Lakeland-
Pactolus
3.9
12.3
4.6
4.6
3.9
*
4.6
*
3.9
*
12.3
6.0
3.9
12.3
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
2.4 -
*
2.4
*
S
SS
S
S
S
ss
S
NS
S
ss
ss
S
S
ss
NS
NS
SS
ss
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
S
SS
S
NS
S2
SI
SSI
S2
SSI
S2
NS
SS2
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
S2
SSI
111
-------
NORTH CAROLINA
48. Lakeland- 2.4 S
Bertie * NS NS
Dragston * NS
49. Weeksville- * NS $
Pasquotank * NS
50. Bladen- 11.0 SS s$2
Bayboro 39.9 NS
51. Bladen- 11.0 SS c
Lenoir- * NS N5
Hyde * NS
52. Leaf- 15.9 NS
Lenoir- * NS ^
Craven * NS
53. Bladen- 11.0 SS $$2
Lenoir * NS
54. Bladen 11.0 SS 9
Dunbar- 7.8 SS 5b
Craven * NS
55. Bertie- * NS $
Woodington * NS
56. Craven- * NS ,»
Marlboro- 4.6 S Sl3
Bladen 11.0 SS
57. Craven- * NS .,
Leaf- 15.9 NS Ni
Lenior * NS
58. Craven- * NS K
Bladen- 11.0 SS ^
Bertie * NS
59. Coxville- * NS N$
Exum * NS
60. Lenior- * NS \\S
Leaf 15.9 NS
61. Lychburg- 6.0 S ^
Dunbar- 7.8 SS b
Rains 13.1 SS
62. Lenior- * NS ..<•
Craven- * NS N
Coxville * NS
112
-------
CAROLINA
63. Dunbar- 7.8 SS
Lynchburg- 6.0 S SSI
Goldsboro 12.3 SS
64. Hyde- * NS
Pocomoke- * NS NS
Rutlege * NS
65. Bayboro- 39.9 NS
Hyde * NS
NS
66. Portsmouth- * NS
Woodington * NS
113
-------
OHIO
Land Resources Soil Association
1. Soils in high lime 1. Hoytville-
glacial lake Nappanee
sediments
2. Blount-
Haskins-
Pewamo
3. Nappanee-
St. Clair
4. Latty-
Nappanee
5. Paulding-
Roselms
6. Toledo-
Fulton
7. Montgomery
Pewamo-
Del Rey
8. Lenawee-
Del Rey-
Haskins
9. Del Rey-
Ful ton-
Toledo
10. Tuscola-
Sisson-
Kibbie
1 1 . Haney-
Haskins-
Belmore
12. Millgrove-
Mermill-
Haskins
CEC
33.5
28.1
20.8
19.7
30.6
28.1
*
*
28.1
*
*
*
*
*
30.6
*
*
*
19.7
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
19.7
*
*
*
19.7
Suscept.
Level
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ASS":
S"SC?
RatjJ
NS
MS
IV
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
!•
NS
I*
NS
N$'
NS
NS
114
-------
•,.-•- in high
'1tfie glacial
fin of
Wlsconsin Age
13. Granby-
Ottokee-
Tedrow
14. Blount-
Toledo-
Del Rey-
15. Toledo-
Bono
16. Blount-
Pewamo
17. Blount-
Morley-
Pewamo
18. Miamian-
Fox
19. Miamian-
Celina
20. Miamian-
Brookston-
Crosby
21. Crosby-
Mi amian-
Milton
22. Lewisburg-
Castalia-
Millsdale-
Milton
23. Brookston-
Crosby
24. Crosby-
Brookston-
Celina
25. Fox-
Genesee-
Ockley
26. Fox-
Li ppincott
*
*
*
20.8
*
*
*
*
20.8
30.6
20.8
17.5
30.6
*
14.2
*
18.9
*
31.3
20.3
20.3
*
*
*
*
*
*
31.3
20.3
20.3
31.3
18.9
14.2
16.3
13.6
14. 2
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
SS2
115
-------
OHIO
27. Russell- 15.9 NS
Mi amian- * NS $
Xenia- * NS
Wynn * NS
28. Ragsdale- 34.8 NS N$
Fincastle 14.5 SS
29. Reesville- 15.7 NS $
Ragsdale 34.8 NS
3. Soils in glacial 30. Rossmoyne- 14.0 SS
drift of Eden- 30.9 NS N$
Illinoian Age. Cincinnati- 15.2 NS
Edenton * NS
31. Rossmoyne- 14.0 SS 5#
Hickory * NS
32. Rossmoyne- 14.0 SS cjf
Edenton- * NS
Loudon * NS
33. Cana- * NS $
Rossmoyne- 14.0 SS
Latham * NS
34. Clermont- 11.6 SS ^
Avonburg 12.2 SS
35. Loudon- * NS $
Edenton- * NS
Bratton * NS
36. Boston- * NS $
Bratton- * NS
Rossmoyne 14.0 SS
37. Haubstadt- * NS 6
Otwell- * NS
Negley 11.4 SS
38. Hanover- * SS $$
Muskingum- 8.1 SS
Loudonville * SS
39. Hanover- * SS $
Muskingum- 8.1 SS
Alford 1.5 NS
116
-------
OHIO
1 Soils in
limestone and
shale.
* Soils in low
lime glacial lake
sediments.
' Soils in low
lime glacial drift
°f Wisconsin Age.
40. Bratton-
Opequon-
Lawshe-
Nicholson
41. Eden-
Bratton-
Opequon
42. Mahoning-
Haskins-
Allis
43. Canadice-
Caneadea
44. Conneaut-
Otisville-
Elnora
45. Venango-
Frenchtown-
Cambridge
46. Mahoning-
Trumbull
47. Mahoning-
Ellsworth
48. Geeburg-
Glenford
49. Wadsworth-
Ri ttman
50. Rittman-
Wadsworth
51. Remsen-
Geeburg
52. Canfield-
Wooster-
Ravenna
53. Bennington-
Cardington-
Pewamo-
54. Cardington-
Alexandria-
Bennington
*
*
*
*
30.9
*
*
*
19.7
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
28.8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
30.6
*
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
117
-------
OHIO
55. Bennington- * NS (JS
Pewamo 30.6 NS
56. Bennington- * NS NS
Cardington * NS
57. Tiro- * NS NS
Luray * NS
58. Bogart- * NS $
Chili- * NS ""
Jimtown * NS
59. Chili- * NS NS
Wheeling- 10.5 SS
Canfield * NS
60. Chili- * NS ,5
Wheeling- 10.5 SS
Chagrin * NS floods
61. Sebring- * NS NS
Fitchville * NS
62. Fitchville- * NS $
Chili- * NS
Carlisle * NS
63. Carlisle- * NS H5
Linwood * NS
64. Platea- * NS N$
Sheffield * NS
7. Soils in 65. Westmore- * NS N5
sandstone and Guernsey 9.7 SS
shale.
66. Gilpin- 12.3 SS
Upshur- 31.4 NS
Guernsey 9.7 SS
67. Upshur- 31.4 NS
Gilpin- 12.3 SS
Dekalb 17.3 NS
68. Gilpin- 12.3 SS
Guernsey- 9.7 SS
Keene * NS
69. Upshur- 31.4 NS f|5
Gilpin- 12.3 SS
Woodsfield * NS
70. Guernsey- 9.7 SS $
Westmore- * NS
Westmoreland 12.0 SS
118
-------
OHIO
71.
72.
73.
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
84.
Gilpin-
Dekalb
Guernsey-
Westmoreland-
Brookside
Dekal fa-
lile ike rt
Westmoreland-
Gil pin
Guernsey-
El ba-
Brookside
Upshur-
Woodsfield-
Gilpin
Upshur-
Gilpin-
Zanesville-
Dekalb
Upshur-
Gilpin-
Monongahela
Strip Mine Spoil-
Guernsey-
Westmore
Gilpin-
Zanesville-
Keene
Gilpin-
Keene
Muskingum-
Berks
Latham-
Muskingum
Muskingum-
Dekalb-
Latham
12.3
17.3
9.7
12.0
*
17.3
*
12.0
12.3
9.7
*
*
31.4
*
12.3
31.4
12.3
10.4
17.3
31.4
12.3
7.8
*
9.7
*
12.3
10.4
*
12.3
*
8.1
16.9
*
8.1
8.1
17.3
*
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS2
SSI
NS
SSI
NS
NS
SS2
SS2
NS
SS2
SS2
SS2
NS
NS
119
-------
OHIO
85. Colyer- * SS $
Trappist- * SS
Berks 16.9 NS
86. Gilpin- 12.3 SS *
Latham- * NS
Dekalb 17.3 NS
87. Monongahela- 7.8 SS $
Allegheny 6.8 SS
88. Gilpin- 12.3 SS •„$
Dekalb- 17.3 NS n
Strip Mine Spoil * NS
89. Guernsey- 9.7 SS N$
Upshur- 31.4 NS
Strip Mine Spoil * NS
120
-------
-------
PENNSYLVANIA
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
B.
4. Substrata of
limestone and
dolomite.
Edgemont-
Hazleton
Gilpin-
Clymer-
Cookport
Gilpin-
Hazleton-
Calvin
Gilpin-
Ernest-
Wharton
Gilpin-
Upshur-
Weikert
Hazleton-
Cookport
18. Hazleton-
Gil pin-
Ernest
19.
Substrata of 20.
reddish, yellow-
ish and brown-
ish clay shale
21.
Soils formed in
materials weath-
ered from carbon-
ate sedimentary
rocks
Rayne-
Wharton-
Ernest
Cavode-
Wharton-
Gilpin
Upshur-
Gilpin-
Clarksburg
22.
23.
Duffield-
Conestoga-
Hagerstown
Hagerstown-
Duffield
8.4
12.3
16.3
7.6
12.3
8.4
12.5
12.3
11.0
10.6
12,
31,
12.9
8.4
7.6
8.4
12.3
11.0
5.0
10.6
11.0
9.5
10.6
12.3
31.4
12.3
13.8
16.8
13.6
*
*
16.8
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
s
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
ssi
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
sz
122
-------
24. Hagerstown-
Edom
*
*
NS
NS
NS
Substrata of
calcareous
shale, lime-
stone and
sandstone
25. Murrill-
Clarksburg
26. Washington-
Duff i eld
27. Edom-
Weikert-
Klinesville
28. Gernsey-
Culleoka
29. Morrison-
Vanderlip
6. Substrata of 30. Mertz-
cherty lime- El liber-
stone Kreamer
Soils formed in
materials weath-
ered from igneous
and metamorphic
rocks
7. Substrata of 31. Neshaminy-
diabase, gabbro, Glenelg
and diorite
32. Towhee-
Neshaminy
8. Substrata of 33. Chester-
schist geniss Glenelg
and porcelonite,
metarhyolite 34. Edgemont-
and metabosalt Highfield
35. Glenelg-
Manor
36. Highfield-
Arendts vine-
Myers vi lie
37. Lehigh-
Brecknock-
Neshaminy
6.9
13.8
*
16.8
*
12.9
*
9.7
*
*
*
5.7
14.1
22.2
*
14.1
16.6
22.2
22.2
13.7
*
*
*
*
10.8
14.1
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
s
SS
SS
NS
^
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SSI
NS
SS2
SSI
SSI
SSI
SS2
NS
NS
SSI
NS
SS2
SS2
123
-------
PENNSYLVANIA
D. Soils formed
in Glacial till
^
9. Substrata
reddish
10. Substrata
grayish
38. Oquago-
Lordstown
39. Oquago-
Wellsboro-
Morris
40. Morris-
Wei Isboro-
Oquago
41. Wellsboro-
Morris-
Lackawanna
42. Canfield-
Rovenna
43. Erie-
Langford
44. Hanover-
Alvira
45. Hartleton-
Berks-
Watson
46. Ravenna-
Frenchtown
47. Sheffield-
Platea
48. Swartswood-
Wurtsboro
49. Venango-
Cambridge
50. Volusia-
Mardin
Lordstown
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
17.2
*
*
*
29.1
*
*
*
16.9
*
*
*
*
12.8
*
*
*
28.8
20.6
26.2
*
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
IP
NS
s
$s2
ijt
I>
N$
5*
H$
N$
N5
4
•nj
N*
124
-------
PENNSYLVANIA
. Soils formed in
unconsolidated
water sorted
materials
11. Substrata of
stratified
fluvial sand,
silt, gravel
12. Substrata of
lacustrine
clay and silt
51. Chenango-
Howard-
Pope
52. Conotton-
Birdsall
53. Duncannon-
Barbour-
Pope
54. Monongahela-
Philo-
Melvin
55. Pope-
Alton-
Chenango
56. Wayland-
Chenango-
Braceville
57. Canadice-
Caneadea
13. Substrata of 58. Howell-
marine clay Fallingston
and sand
17.9
*
4.1
*
*
*
*
4.1
7.8
11.4
17.3
4.1
*
17.9
*
17.9
*
*
*
*
it
NS
NS
S
NS
NS
ss
S
S
ss
ss
NS
S
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
S2
SS2
SSI
NS
NS
NS
125
-------
RHODE ISLAND
Land Resources
Soil Association
5. Areas of coastal
lowlands affected
by tidal water and
dominated by soils
formed in sandy
sediments.
13. Matunuck-
Udipsamments-
Beaches
Assoc-
CEC Suscept. SusceP'
Level Ratii*
1. Areas of glaciated
uplands dominated
by deep soils with
a friable substratum.
2. Areas of glaciated
uplands dominated
by deep soils with
a firm substratum.
3. Areas of outwash
plains, terraces,
kames, and eskers
dominated by deep
soils with a sandy
and gravelly
substratum.
4. Areas of inland
depressions and
low-lying positions
dominated by
organic soils.
1 . Canton-
Charlton-
Sutton
2. Charl ton-
Rock outcrop
3. Gloucester-
Hi nckley
4. Narragansett-
Bridgehamp ton-
Mapping
5. Newport-
Pitts town
6. Paxton-
Woodbridge
7. Ridgebury-
Whitman-
Leicester
8. Stissing-
Mansfield
9. Enfield-
Bridgehampton-
Agawam
10. Hinckley-
Merrimac
11. Walpole-
Scarboro-
Rumney
12. Carlisle-
Adrian
*
14.3
*
14.3
*
11.5
7.6
*
28.4
*
14.9
*
21.8
17.5
14.6
*
21.6
*
*
*
28.4
6.9
7.6
41.1
*
*
*
*
*
SS
SS
NS
SS
ss
ss
ss
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
f* f*
SS
fclf*
NS
NS
tlC
NS
NS
NS
NS
SSZ
JJ*"
ssi
ssi
NS
|V
SS2
iiC
N5
NS
NS
$
$$
N
N
*
*
it
NS
SS
NS
126
-------
SttUTH
CAROLINA
Resource
Soil Association
Assoc.
CEC Suscept. Suscept.
Level Rating
S^e Ridge 1. Evard-
^untains Edneyville
2. Fannin-
Talladega
3. Ashe-
Saluda-
Edneyville
p?uthern 4. Iredell-
'ed"iont Mecklenburg
5. Wilkes-
Winnsboro-
Mecklenburg
6. Pacolet-
Grover
7. Pacolet-
Madison-
Wilkes
8. Tatum-
Nason
9. Madison-
Cecil
10. Cecil-
Hiwassee-
Cataula
11. Cecil-
Appling-
Cataula
12. Georgeville-
Herndon
13. Cecil-
Mecklenburg-
r->4--...i ^
•k
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
it
8.4
8.4
*
*
8.4
*
*
*
*
8.4
*
*
SS
SS
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
NS
ss
SSI
SSI
SSI
MC*
NS
NS
SSI
SS2
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SS2
127
-------
SOUTH CAROLINA
3. Carolina and
Georgia
Sandhills
4. Southern
Coastal Plain
5. Atlantic Coast
Flatwoods
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
Lakeland-
Fuquay-
Troup
Troup-
Wagram-
Vaucluse
Fuquay-
Dothan-
Blanton
Dothan-
Fuquay-
Rains
Norf ol k-
Coxville-
Wagram
Varina-
Fuquay-
Dothan
Faceville-
Fuquay-
Orangeburg
Wagram-
Lakeland-
Norfolk
Cantey-
Smithboro-
Persanti
Goldsboro-
Rains-
Norfolk
Goldsboro-
Chipley
Lynchburg-
Goldsboro-
Rains
Argent-
Bladen
Craven-
Bladen
2.4
*
4.2
4.2
*
*
*
*
5.6
*
*
10.7
3.9
16.0
*
*
*
*
4.9
*
7.0
*
2.4
3.9
*
*
*
12.3
10.7
3.9
12.3
*
6.0
12.3
10.7
*
11.0
*
11.0
s
ss
s
s
ss
ss
ss
ss
s
ss
ss
ss
s
NS
ss
ss
ss
ss
s
ss
ss
ss
s
s
NS
NS
NS
ss
ss
s
ss
NS
s
ss
ss
NS
SS
NS
SS
52
j<-
s$i
s$i
5$1
C$1
J$1
551
S?
itC
IV
5*1
$1
y
551
us
1(5
128
-------
SOUTH CAROLINA
28. Yemassee- * NS
Wahee- * NS NS
Bladen 11.0 SS
29. Meggett- * NS N(;
Santee * NS 1N;>
30. Wahee- * NS N-
Bethera * NS ^
31. Seabrook- * NS
Yonges- * NS NS
Seewee * NS
32. LynnHaven- * NS
Leon- * NS NS
Rutlege * NS
33. Chipley- * NS
Cainhoy- * S NS
Ocilla * NS
34. Wehadkee- * NS NC.
Chewacla * NS ^
35. Johnston- * NS N~
Rutlege * NS Mb
36. Tawcaw- * NS NC.
Chastain * NS INi
37. Capers- * NS N<.
Bohicket * NS ^
38. Fripp- * S ~?
Beach * NS **
129
-------
TENNESSEE
Land Resource
Soil Association
CEC Suscept. Susce
Level
A. Soils of the
major stream
bottoms. (Entisols,
Inceptisols,
Mollisols, Alfisols,
Ultisols)
1 . Loamy , s i 1 ty , 1 .
and sandy soils
of the Mississippi
River bottoms.
(Fluvaquents, 2.
Udifluvents,
Haplaquepts, Udi-
psamments, Argi-
udolls, Hapludolls, 3.
Haplaquolls.)
2. Clayey soils of 4.
the Mississippi
River bottoms
(Haplaquepts,
Ochraqualfs, 5.
Hapludalfs,
Hapludolls)
3. Silty and loamy 6.
soils of the
bottoms in the
loess and coastal
plain regions. 7.
(Fluvaquents,
Udifluvents)
4. Loamy, silty, 8.
and clayey soils
of the bottoms
and terraces in
the Highland Rim
and Nashville 9.
Basin (Hapludolls,
Dystrochepts,
Eutrochrepts,
Hapludults, 10.
Hapludalfs)-
Commerce-
Robinsonvi lie-
Crevasse
Adler-
Morganfield-
Convent
Reelfoot-
Tiptonville-
Commerce
Sharkey-
Tunica-
Bowdre
Forestdale-
Alli gator-
Dundee
Fa lay a -
Waverly-
Collins
Falaya-
Waverly-luka
Wolftever-
Egam-
Beason-
Lindside
Ennis-
Humphreys-
Lobelville
Arrington-
Lindell-
E gam-
Armour
*
*
*
8.7
*
*
*
*
*
43.8
*
*
*
52.6
*
13.4
*
10.5
13.4
*
21.1
28.5
21.2
*
*
*
*
*
*
15.2
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
S52
130
-------
EE
foils of the
Loess Region
JAlfisols, Entisols,
Rolling to steep, 11. Memphis-
wen-drained and
moderately well
drained, silty
soils from thick
loess. (Hapludalfs
Fragiudalfs,
Fluvaquents,
Udifluvents)
Loring
2.
12.
Level to rolling
moderately well
drained and well-
drained, silty
soils from thick
loess. (Fragiudalfs,
Hapludallfs,
Fluvaquents,
Udifluvents)
3- Level and undu- 13.
lating poorly
drained to
moderately well
drained, silty soil
from thick loess.
(Fragiudalfs
Fragiaqualfs,
Ochraqualfs,
Haplaquolls,
Hapludalfs,
Fluvaquents,
Udifluvents)
Undulating and
rolling, well-
drained, and
moderately well
drained, silty
find loamy soils
from loess and
coastal plain
sediment.
'(Paleudalfs,
Fragiudalfs,
Hapludalfs,
Paleudults,
Fluvaquents,
Udifluvents)
Grenada-
Lori ng-
Memphis
14.
15.
16.
Grenada-
Call oway
Henry
Routon-
Calloway-
Center
Dekoven-
Center
Lexington-
Grenada-
Memphis-
Ruston
13.1
12.2
11.5
12.2
13.1
11.5
13.3
10.7
*
13.3
*
11.1
11.5
13.1
5.7
SS
SS
SSI
SS
SS
SS
SSI
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
S
SSI
NS
NS
SSI
131
-------
TENNESSEE
C. Soils of the
Coastal Plain
Region (Ultisols,
Alfisols, Entisols)
17. Ruston-
Lexington-
Providence
1. Hilly, loamy
soils from
coastal plain
sediment and
undulating and
rolling, silty
soils from thin
loess. (Paleudults,
Paleudalfs,
Fragiudalfs,
Fluvaquents,
Udifluvents)
2. Hilly, clayey 18.
soils from coastal
plain sediment
and rolling and
undulating silty 19.
soils from thin
loess. (Paleudults,
Hapludults,
Fragiudalfs, 20.
Fragidults,
Hapludalfs,
Paleudalfs,
Fluvaquents,
Udifluvents)
3. Undulating and 21.
rolling, silty
soil from
alluvium and
loess. (Hapludults,
Fragiudults)
D. Soils of the
Highland Rim
(Ultisols, Inceptisols
Alfisols)
1. Hilly and steep, 22. Bodine-
cherty, clayey and Mountview-
loamy soils and Dickson
narrow strips of
silty soils from 23. Bodine-
limestone, thin Talbott
loess, and shale.
(Mainly Paleudults24. Sulphura-
with monor areas Christian-
of Fragiudults, Mountview
Hapludults, Dystro-
chrepts, Hapludalfs)
Shubuta-
Cuthbert-
Dulac
Oktibbeha-
Boswell-
Dulac
Shubuta-
Silerton-
Bodine-
Dulac
Pickwick-
Paden
5.7
11.1
11.0
6.8
*
8.4
8.4
6.8
10.8
8.7
8.4
12.9
11.8
8.7
*
9.6
8.7
16.3
9.4
*
S
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
NS
NS
SS
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
NS
ss
ss
ss
ssi
ssi
NS
ssi
ssi
ssi
SS2
ssi
132
-------
LESSEE
2. Hilly and
rolling, cherty
and clayey soils
and undulating
silty soils
from limestone
and thin loess.
(Paleudults,
Hapludults,
Fragiudults)
3.
25.
26,
27.
28.
Undulating and
rolling, silty
and loamy soils
from thin loess
coastal plain
sediment, and
limestone.
(Fragiudults, Fragi-
aquults, Paleudults,
Hapludults)
4- Undulating and 29.
rolling, silty
and clayey soils
from thin loess, 30.
alluvium, and
limestone.
(Paleudults,
Paleudalfs)
5- Rolling and 31.
undulating,
clayey, loamy,
and silty soils
from alluvium
and thin loess
(Paleudults)
;J°ils of the outer
™n of the Nash-
/Jlle Basin.
Alfisols, Ultisols,
Inceptisols)
1.
Hilly and steep,
cherty and
•clayey soils
from colluviurn
and limestone.
(Hapludults,
Hapludalfs,
Paledults)
32.
Baxter (Fullerton)-
Mountview-
Dickson
Christian-
Mountview
Brandon-
Lax
Dickson-
Mountview-
Guthrie
Pembroke-
Crider
Baxter-
Bewleyvilie-
Pembroke
Waynesboro
Decatur-
Bewleyvilie-
Curt is town
Dell rose-
Mi mosa-
Bodine
9.1
*
9.6
9.4
*
*
*
9.6
*
11.0
12.4
11.2
9.1
*
12.4
8.9
10.6
*
13.9
19.5
8.7
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SS2
133
-------
TENNESSEE
2. Rolling and
hilly, clayey
and loamy
soils from
phosphatic
limestone shale
and alluvium;
and limestone
outcrops.
(Hapludalfs,
Eutrochrepts,
Hapludolls)
3. Undulating and
rolling, clayey
and silty soils
from phosphatic
limestone and
alluvium.
(Paleudalfs,
Paleudults,
Hapludults)
F. Soils of the inner
part of the Nash-
ville Basin.
(Alfisols, Mollisols)
1. Undulating and
rolling, clayey
soils from
limestone;
and rockcrops.
(Hapludalfs,
Hapludolls,
Rendolls)
2. Undulating, clayey37.
and silty soils
from limestone
and alluvium.
(Hapludalfs,
Paleudalfs)
3. Level and 38.
undulating, clayey
soils from
alluvium and
limestone.
(Haplaquolls,
Ochraqualfs,
Hapludalfs)
33. Mimosa-
Armour-
Rock outcrop
34. Stiversville-
Hampshire-
Inman
19.5
15.3
*
*
*
*
35. Maury-
Braxton-
Harpeth
*
*
*
36.. Talbott-
Gladeville-
Barfield-
Rock outcrop
16.3
*
*
*
Bradyvilie-
Talbott-
Lomond-
Cumberland
Roellen-
Tupelo-
Capshaw
*
16.3
*
10.2
*
*
*
NS
NS
SS
ss
SS
ss
NS
SSI
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
134
-------
^NNESSEE
Soils of the
Cumberland
Plateau and
Mountains.
(Ultisols and
Inceptisols)
1. Undualting to 39
hilly, loamy soils
from sandstone
and shale.
(Hapludults and
Dystrochrepts) 40,
2. Steep and
hilly, stony
and loamy soils
from sandstone,
shale, and lime-
stone; and rock
outcrops.
(Dystrochrepts,
Hapludults,
Paleudults,
Hapludalfs)
Soils of the
Ridges and Valleys
(Ultisols, Alfisols,
^ceptisols)
1- Rolling to steep,
cherty and clayey
soils from
dolomitic lime-
stone.
(Paleudults)
2« Rolling and
hilly, clayey
soils from
do! omi ti c
limestone.
(Paleudults)
43.
44.
45.
46.
Hartsells-
Lonewood-
Ramsey-
Gilpin
Hartsells-
Ramsey-
Gilpin
41. Bouldin-
Rock outcrop-
Ramsey
42.
Ramsey-
Hartsells-
Grimsley-
Gil pi n-
Muskingum-
Gilpin-
Jefferson
Fullerton-
Dewey
Fullerton-
Bodine
Dunmore-
Dewey
*
*
*
12.3
*
*
12.3
*
*
*
*
*
*
12.3
11.1
12.3
5.5
8.2
11.2
8.2
8.7
6.9
11.2
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
s
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
SSI
135
-------
TENNESSEE
3.
Undulating to
hilly, clayey
and loamy soils
from alluvium
and limestone.
(Paleudults,
Hapludults,
Fragiudults)
4.
5.
Steep an'1
hilly, shaly,
clayey and
loamy soils
from calcareous
shale.
(Eutrochrepts,
Hapludalfs)
Undulating to
hilly, clayey
and loamy soils
from shale and
limestone.
(Hapludalfs,
Hapludults,
Eutrochrepts,
Dystrochrepts)
47. Decatur-
Dewey-
Waynesboro
48. Waynesboro-
Etowah-
Sequatchie-
Allen
49. Waynesboro-
Allen-
Sequatchie-
Statler
50. Holston-
Monongahela
51. Dandridge-
Needmore-
Whitesburg
10,
11,
52. Talbott-
Rock outcrop-
Etowah
53. Litz-
Sequoia-
Talbott
54. Talbott-
Sequoia-
Dandridge
Steep ridges 55.
and rolling valleys
with stony, loamy
and clayey soils.
(Dystrochrepts, 56.
Hapludalfs,
Hapludults)
Hilly and steep,
dark red, clayey
and loamy soils
from calcareous
sandstone.
(Rhodudults,
Paleudults)
51
Wallen-
Talbott-
Montevallo
Ramsey-
Wallen-
Jefferson
Tellico-
Alcoa
8.9
8.9
8.6
10.3
4.9
8.9
4.9
10.3
*
9.5
6.5
21.2
11.8
*
16.3
*
8.6
*
12.6
16.3
16.3
12.6
21.2
*
16.3
*
*
*
5.5
13.5
9.5
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
SS
S
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
S
SS
SS
ssi
ssi
ssi
ssi
NS
SS2
SS2
NS
SS2
ssi
136
-------
^'ttenden County
Resource
Soil Association
Assoc.
CEC Suscept. Suscept.
Level Rating
Soils that
formed in
'"ater-deposited
Material in the
Champ! ain
Valley
J°ils that
Joined in glacial
till in the
Chaplain Valley
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
Vergennes-
Covington
Covington
Enosburg-
Whately-
Vergennes
Munson-
Raynham-
Scantic
Hartland-
Belgrade-
Munson
Limerick-
Hadley-
Winooski
Muck-
Peat
Adams-
Windsor
Col ton-
Stetson
Farmington-
Nellis--
Stockbridge
Palatine-
Vergennes
Stcckbridge-
Nellis-
Palatine
29.3
39.4
39.4
*
*
29.3
*
*
*
25.9
*
*
*
11.8
19.6
*
*
*
6.0
*
*
*
*
15.1
*
29.3
15.1
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
s
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
MC
No
C* 1
S2
C" C T
VV 1
OO 1
NS
MC
liO
NS
137
-------
VERMONT
Chittenden County
3. Soils of the
Green Mountains
and associated
foothills
Grand Isle County
1. Level to gently
sloping, wet and
slightly wet
soils.
2. Productive loamy
soils-most are
shallow, but some
are deep to lime-
stone bedrock.
3. Bog (organic)
soils and very
wet clay soils
4. Nearly level or
gently sloping
deep sandy and
gravelly soils,
and sandy soils
underlain by clay.
5. Loamy soils shallow
to slate or shale
bedrock and deep wet
clayey soils.
Windsor County
1. Soils that formed
in water-deposited
materials on
terraces and old
lake plains
13. Lyman-
Marlow
14. Peru-
Marl ow
15. Peru-
Cabot
1. Covington-
Kendaia-
Swanton-
Amenia
2. Soils that formed
in glacial till in
the Green Mountains
and foothills.
2.
Benson-
Amenia-
Nell is
3. Carlisle-
Livingston-
Balch
4. Kars-
Elmwood
Mel rose
5. St. Albans-
Dutchess-
Covington
1. Hadley-
Winooski-
Limerick
2. Unadilla-
Windsor
3. Merrimac-
Windsor
4. Lyman-
Marlow-
Peru
*
27.1
20.9
27.1
20.9
16.3
39.4
*
*
18.1
32.5
18.1
*
*
*
*
*
11.4
*
*
39.4
11.8
19.6
*
12.5
6.0
41.0
6.0
27.1
20.9
ss
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS2
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
ss
NS
ssz
SS
NS
NS
SS
s
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
52
NS
NS
138
-------
"Inci
sor County
Soils fonned in
9lacial till on
uplands in the
fiastern part of
the county.
son County
that formed
!n water-deposited
Material in the
Champlain Valley.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Marlow-
Peru-
Lyman
Peru-
Marl ow-
Lyman
Woodstock-
Paxton-
Woodbridge
Woodstock-
Col rain
Paxton-
Woodbridge-
Woodstock
Colrain-
Buckland
Colrain-
Pomfret-
Buckland
Glover-
Calais
Calais-
Buckland
Cabot-
Muck
Vergennes-
Covington
Covington
Swanton-
Elmwood
Raynham-
Amenia
Winooski-
Limerick
Muck-
Peat
27.1
20.9
*
20.9
27.1
*
*
20.2
17.5
*
14.0
20.2
17.5
*
14.0
16.0
14.0
*
16.0
*
17.9
17.9
16.0
16.3
*
29.3
39.4,
39.4
*
*
*
18.1
19.6
*
*
*
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SSI
NS
SS2
SS2
SS2
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
139
-------
VERMONT
Addison County
2. Soils that formed
in glacial till in
the Chaplain
Valley.
3. Soils of the Green
Mountains and
associated
foothills.
Orange County
1. Soils that formed
in water-deposited
material in valleys
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
1.
2.
3.
Colton-
Stetson-
Adams
Farmington-
Nellis
Nassau-
Dutchess
Dutchess-
Nassau
Nellis-
Amenia
Lyman-
Berkshi re-
Mar low
Berkshire-
Marlow (sloping)
Berkshi re-
Ma rlow (steep)
Calais-
Cabot-
Buckland
Berkshire-
Cabot-
Peru
Peru-
Cabot
Hadley-
Winooski-
Li me rick
Belgrade-
Hartland
Merrimac-
Agawam-
Windsor-
Winooski
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
18.1
*
*
27.1
*
27.1
*
27.1
17.9
16.3
16.0
*
16.3
20.9
20.9
16.3
11.8
19.6
*
*
25.9
41.0
6.9
6.0
19.6
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
s
NS
ssi
NS
ssi
SSI
NS
nC
N5
NS
NS
i /•
NS
, ,/•
NS
NS
MS
IV
NS
552
140
-------
County
Soils on uplands
County
that formed
}n water-deposited
Jaterial on
noodplains.
'Soils that formed
1" glacial till
1" the Champlain
Valley
that formed
Ji water-deposited
^terial on terraces
'<1 old lake
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Buckland-
Cabot
Vershire-
Glover-
Buckland
Colrain-
Buckland-
Tunbridge
Pomfret-
Tunbridge-
Buckland
Tunbridge-
Woodstock-
Colrain-
Buckland
Tunbridge-
Woodstock-
Buckland
Tunbridge-
Woodstock-
Stowe
Limerick-
Hadley-
Winooski
St. Albans-
Farmington
Georgia-
St. Albans
Massena
Enosburg-
Walpole
Munson-
Buxton-
Bel grade
Munson-
Scantic
Panton-
Covinqton
16.0
16.3
*
*
16.0
14.0
16.0
*
*
*
16.0
*
*
14.0
16.0
*
*
16.0
*
*
*
*
11.8
19.6
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
20.5
*
*
*
*
39.4
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
hi C*
IM S
nO
SS2
SS2
SS2
(,_1
bbl
SS2
SSI
NS
SS2
NS
NS
ll«J
NS
NS
11 0
NS
11 w
141
-------
VERMONT
Franklin County
4. Soils that formed
in glacial till in
the Green Mountains
and uplands.
Rutland County
1. Soils that formed
in water-desposited
and organic materials
on terraces and old
lake plains.
2. Soils that formed
in glacial till
in the Green
Mountains and
foothills.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
1.
>
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
Windsor-
Eldridge
Muck-
Peacham
Ly man-
Mar low-
Peru
Peru-
Mar low
Peru-
Cabot
Vergennes-
Covington
Hartland-
Bel grade
Hinckley-
Merrimac-
Windsor
Copake-
Windsor
Fredon-
Halsey-
Scantic
Winooski-
Limerick
Hadley-
Winooski-
Limerick
Muck and Peat
Lyman-
Mar low-
Peru
Marlow-
Peru-
Lyman (sloping)
Marlow-
Peru-
Lvman (steeo)
6.0
*
*
*
*
27.1
20.9
20.9
27.1
20.9
16.3
29.3
39.4
25.9
*
7.4
41.0
6.0
*
6.0
*
*
*
19.6
*
11.8
19.6
*
*
*
27.1
20.9
27.1
20.9
*
27.1
20.9
*
S
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
S
SS
S
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SSI
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ssi
ssi
«|C
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
i'**
NS
IV
NS
!""'
142
-------
VERMONT
County
Soils formed in
glacial till in
the Champ!ain
Valley.
ington County
Soils that formed
°n water-deposited
Material on
floodplains.
Soils that formed
in water-deposited
Material on
terraces and old
'ake plains.
s.oils that formed
ift glacial till in
*he Green Mountains
on uplands.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Peru-
Marl ow-
Lyman
Peru-
Cabot
Nellis-
Amenia
Stockbridge-
Amenia
Farmington-
Nellis
Nassau-
Dutchess
Dutchess-
Nassau
Bernardston-
Pittstown
Hadley-
Winooski-
Limerick
Windsor
Hartland-
Bel grade
Lyman-
Mar low-
Peru
Peru-
Mar low -
Peru-
Cabot-
Marlow
Muck and Peat-
Peacham
20.9
27.1
*
20.9
16.3
*
18.1
15.1
18.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
11.8
19.6
*
6.0
25.9
*
*
27.1
20. S
20.9
27.1
20.9
16.3
27.1
*
*
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
S
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
MO
IMS
no
MC
rO
MC
INo
NS
SSI
SSI
MC*
NS
NS
NS
NS
MC*
NS
NS
hif*
NS
143
-------
VERMONT
Washington County
4. Soils that formed
in glacial till
on mountains and
uplands in the
eastern part of
the county.
LaMoille County
1. Soils that formed
in water-deposited
material on
floodplains.
2. Soils that formed
in water-deposited
material on
terraces and old
lake plains*
3. Soils that formed
in glacial till in
the Green Mountains
and on uplands.
4. Soils formed in
organic material
in depressions.
Essex County
1. Soils that formed
in loamy glacial
till on uplands
and mountains.
2. Soils formed in
water-deposited
material on
floodplains.
8. Glover-
Calais
9. Calais-
Buckland
1. Limerick-
Hadley-
Winooski
2. Windsor
3. Hartland
4. Munson-
Buxton-
Belgrade
5. Lyman-
Marlow-
Peru
6. Peru-
Ma rlow
7. Cabot-
Peru
8. Muck and Peat
1. Lyman-
Marlow-
Peru
2. Peru-
Marl ow
3. Cabot-
Peru
4. Much and Peat-
Peacham
5. Limerick-
Winooski
*
17.9
17.9
*
11.8
19.6
27.1
20.9
20.9
27.1
16.3
20.9
*
*
*
19.6
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS2
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
6.0
25.9
*
20.5
*
*
27.1
20.9
20.9
27.1
16.3
20.9
*
S
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
MS
si
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
144
-------
!s$ex County
1 Soils that formed
in water-deposited
Material on
terraces and old
lake plains.
^eans County
1 Soils that formed
in glacial till
°n uplands and
the Green Mountains
' s.oils that formed
1r> glacial till on
glands mainly
1n the eastern
Part of the
county.
?°ils that formed
1ri water-deposited
Sand, silty, or
c'ayey material
°n terraces and
°'d lake plains.
County
?°ils that formed
water-deposited
on
and old
plains.
6.
7.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
1.
2.
3.
Windsor
Belgrade-
Hartland
Lyman-
Marlow-
Peru
Paxton-
Woodbridge
Peru-
Mar low
Cabot-
Peru
Muck and Peat-
Peacham
Buckland-
Calais
Cabot-
Buckland
Glover-
Calais
Limerick-
Winooski
Windsor
Scanti c-
Buxton
Elmwood-
Melrose
Hadley-
Winooski-
Limerick
Unadilla-
Windsor-
Merrimac
Merri mac-
Windsor
6.0
*
25.9
*
27.1
20.9
20.2
17.5
20.9
27.1
16.3
20.9
*
*
16.0
17.9
16.3
16.0
*
17.9
*
19.6
6.0
*
20.5
*
11.4
11.8
19.6
*
12.5
6.0
41.0
41.0
6.0
S
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
S
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
S
NS
NS
S
SI
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
NS
SI
NS
NS
NS
SSI
NS
1A5
-------
VERMONT
Windham County
2. Soils that formed
in glacial till
in the Green
Mountains and
foothills.
Soils formed in
glacial till on
uplands in the
eastern part of
the county.
Bennington County
1. Soils that formed
i n water-depos i ted
and organic
materials on
terraces and old
lake plains.
4. Lyman-
Marlow-
Peru
5. Marlow-
Peru-
Lyman
6. Peru-
Marl ow-
Lyman
7. Peru-
Cabot-
Muck
8. Woodstock-
Paxton-
Woodbridge
9. Paxton-
Woodbridge-
Woodstock
10. Woodbridge-
Paxton-
Woodstock
11. Woodbridge-
Cabot-
Muck
1. Hinckley-
Merrimac-
Windsor
2. Copake-
Windsor
3. Fredon-
Halsey-
Scantic
4. Winooski-
Limerick
5. Hadley-
Winooski-
Li merick
6. Muck-
Peat
*
27.1
20.9
27.1
20.9
*
20.9
27.1
*
20.9
16.3
*
*
20.2
17.5
20.2
17.5
*
17.5
20.2
*
17.5
16.3
*
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
7.4
41.0
6.0
*
6.0
*
*
*
19.6
11.8
19.6
*
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
S
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ssi
SSI
NS
NS
146
-------
"ERMONT
j
fir)ning ton County
*• Soils that formed
in glacial till
in the Green
Mountains and
foothills.
Soils formed in
Slacial till on
the slate and
'imestone
Elands.
7. Lyman-
Marlow-
Peru
8. Marlow-
Peru-
Lyman
9. Marlow-
Peru-
Lyman
10. Peru-
Ma rl ow-
Lyman
11. Peru-
Cabot
12. Nellis-
Amenia
13. Stockbridge-
Amenia
14. Amenia-
Kendaia-
Lyons
15. Farmington-
Nellis
16. Nassau-
Dutchess
17. Dutchess-
Nassau
18. Bernardston-
Pittstown
*
27.1
20.9
27.1
20.9
*
27.1
20.9
*
20.9
27.1
*
20.9
16.3
*
18.1
15.1
18.1
18.1
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SSI
SSI
NS
147
-------
TENNESSEE
K. Soils of the
Unaka Mountains.
(Inceptisols,
U1 ti sols,
Spodosols)
1. Steep and very 58.
steep, loamy
and stony soils
at high eleva-
tions from
metamorphic
and igneous
rocks and
colluviurn.
(Dystrochrepts,
Haplumbrepts,
Spodosols)
2. Steep and 60.
very steep,
loamy and
channery soils
from phyllite, 61.
sandstone,
quartzite and
coll uviurn.
(Dystrochrepts,
Hapludults)
3. Hilly and steep, 62.
loamy and stony
soils from meta-
morphic and 63.
igneous rocks.
(Hapludults,
Dystrochrepts)
4. Undulating to 64.
hilly, loamy and
clayey soils
from colluviurn,
alluvium, shale, 65.
and limestone.
(Hapludults,
Paleudults,
Hapludalfs)
Ditney-
Jeffrey-
Brookshi re
59. Unaka-
Ashe
*
*
*
*
*
Sylco-
Ranger-
Citico
Wall en-
Jefferson-
Ramsey
5.5
*
As he-
Hal ewood
Talladega-
Fannin-
Gullied land
Calvin-
Hayter-
Dunmore
Jefferson-
Allen-
Statler
*
*
*
*
*
*
6.9
5.5
4.9
*
SS
ss
SS
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
s
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
s
s
NS
ssi
ssi
ssi
148
-------
VIRGINIA
^nd Resources Soil Association
'• The Applachian 1. Hartsells-
Plateau Wellston-
Coeburn-
Muskingum-
Montevallo-
i\
- Mountains and 2. Muskingum-
uplands Montevallo-
Jefferson-
Hayter-
Allen-
Leadvale
• Limestone valleys 3. Hagers town-
Pi sgah-
Decatur-
Dunmore-
Frederick-
Elliber-
Lodi-
Bolton-
Clarksville-
Groseclose-
Bland-
Carbo-
Chilhowie-
Colbert-
Westmoreland-
Teas-
Litz-
Berks-
Tellico-
Jefferson-
Allen-
Hayter-
Huntington-
Li ndsi de-
Mel vin-
Pope-
Philo-
Atkins-
Cumberland-
Elk-
Captiva-
Taft-
Waynesboro-
Halston-
Monongahela
CEC
*
*
*
8.1
*
8.1
*
5.5
*
4.9
*
*
*
*
6.9
*
5.7
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
16.9
13.5
5.5
4.9
*
16.4
17.9
*
*
11.4
19.2
10.2
*
*
*
8.9
*
7.8
Assoc.
Suscept. Suscept.
Level Rating
SS
SS
SSI
SS
SS
SS
SS
s
SS SS1
s
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
s
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS SSI
_
SS
NS
SS
s
s
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
149
-------
VIRGINIA
4. Blue Ridge
Mountains
(Sandstone and
shale)
5. Blue Ridge
Mountains
(Crystalline
Rocks)
6. Piedmont
underlain by
crystalline
rocks.
Rock land &
Rock outcrops-
Rams ey-
Muskingum-
Lehew
Porters-
Ashe-
Fannin-
Balfour-
Watauga-
Chandler-
Talladega-
Rabun-
Clifton
Cecil-
Appling-
Durham-
Colfax-
Louisburg-
Davidson-
Mecklenburg-
Iredell
Lloyd-
Enon-
Vance-
Helena-
Wilkes
Madison-
Louisa-
Tatum-
Nason-
Lignum-
Manteo-
Chester-
Eubanks-
Brandywine-
Fauquier-
Myersville-
Catoctin-
Elioak-
Glenelg-
Monor-
Culpeper
Albemarle
*
*
11.1
4.0
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
8.4
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
16.6
*
*
*
*
*
*
22.2
13.7
SS
ss
SS
s
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
NS
ss
ss
NS
NS
ss
ss
NS
NS
SS
SS
ss
ss
NS
SS
NS
SS
ss
ss
ss
ss
NS
ss
ss
ss
SSI
ssi
ssi
150
-------
'IRGINIA
Triassic area
of the
Piedmont.
D
1 Carolina slate
belt of southern
Piedmont.
Chesapeake Bay
Region of Coastal
Plains.
Wadesboro-
Mayodan-
Granville-
Creedmoor-
Bucks-
Penn-
Calverton-
Croton-
Brecknock-
Catlett-
Montalto-
Ruxton-
Rapidan-
Kelly-
Athol
Georgeville-
Herndon-
Almance-
Orange-
Congaree-
Chewacla-
Wehadkee-
Starr-
Seneca-
Meadowville-
Wickham-
Altavista-
Augusta-
Roanoke-
Hiwassee-
Masada
Galestown-
Klej-
Plummer-
Rutledge-
Sassafras-
Woodstown-
Dragstown-
Fallsington-
Matapeake-
Caroline-
Atlee-
Mattapex-
Bertie-
Othello-
Elkton-
Portsmouth-
Beltsvi lie-
Fairfax
*
*
*
*
*
11.3
*
*
10.8
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
6.1
*
*
*
6.4
8.9
*
*
14.8
*
*
12.3
*
SS
ss
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS2
SS2
SS2
151
-------
VIRGINIA
10. Middle Coastal
Plain
11. Flatwoods area
Norfolk-
Ruston-
Onslow-
Craven-
Lenoir-
Bladen
Portsmouth-
Bayboro-
Pocomoke-
Galestown-
Klej-
Plummer-
Rutledge-
Fallsington-
Dragston-
Woodstown-
Sassafras-
Elkton-
Othello-
Keyport-
Bertie-
Mattapex-
Matapeake
3.9
5.7
*
*
*
11.0
*
39.9
*
6.1
*
*
*
8.9
6.4
*
*
*
*
12.3
14.8
S
S
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
ssi
152
-------
VIRGINIA
!d Resource
North Blue
Ridge Mountains
Great Lime-
stone Valley
Potomac Ridge
and Valley Area
Allegheny
Mountains
Soil Association
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Edgemont
Hagerstown-
Frederick-
Frankstown
Berks Shale Belt
Dekalb-
Lehew-
Laidig
Ashby-
Calvin-
Litz Ridges
Cory do n-
El liber limestone
Huntington-
Lindside-
Monongahela
Dekalb Mountains
Ash by
Monongahela-
Pope terrace & bottomlands
Philo-
Atkins-
Melvin
Stony Hagerstown-
Belmont
Calvin-
Litz shale hills
Elliber-
Vira
Lodi-
Laidig
CEC Suscept.
Level
*
*
15.7
15.8
16.9
17.3
4.0
12.9
*
12.5
20.6
15.2
5.7
16.4
17.9
7.8
*
*
7.8
3.0
11.4
19.2
17.3
*
22.9
12.5
20.6
5.7
*
*
12.9
S
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
S
SS
w
SS
NS
NS
S
NS
NS
SS
-
-
SS
S
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
S
- .
_
SS
Assoc.
Suscept.
Rating
SI
NS
NS
SS2
NS
MC
Mb
NS
SSI
NS
McO
Wo
NS°
NS
11 w
ceo
552
CC1
DO 1
NS
ll*?
153
-------
WEST VIRGINIA
5. Greenbrier Lime-
stone Valley
6. Southern West
Virginia Shale
Ridges
7. West Central
Pennsylvania
Northern West
Virginia Plateau
8. Tri-State
Tablelands
9. Monongahela-
Ohio Section
16. Hagerstown-
Frankstown-
Frederick
17. Dunmore-
Murrill-
Laidig
18. Westmoreland-
Litz-
Clarksburg
19. Dekalb-
Clymer-
Cookport
20. Frankstown-
Frederick-
Murrill
21. Calvin-
Litz shale hills
22. Tilsit Plateau
23. Atkins
24. Gilpin-
Wharton-
Ernest
25. Gilpin-
Rayne-
Wharton
26. Clymer-
Dekalb-
Plateau
27. Dekalb Mountains and
Cheat Gorge
28. Channery Gil pin-
Calvin Plateau
29. Westmoreland-
Brooke Plateau
30. Gilpin-
Upshur-
Westmoreland-
Hackers
*
15.8
15.7
7.4
6.9
12.9
12.0
20.6
13.8
17.3
16.3
7.6
15.8
15.7
6.9
12.5
20.6
5.3
19.2
12.3
10.6
11.0
12.3
5.0
10.6
16.3
17.3
*
*
*
12.3
12.5
12.0
20.3
12.3
31.4
12.0
it
NS
NS
NS
SS
ss
ss
ss
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
S
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
S
SS
NS
NS
-
SS
ss
ss
ss
ss
NS
SS
NS
SS
—
NS
ssi
ss
NS
NS
si
NS
si
ssi
NS
ssi
S$1
SS2
o
NS
154
-------
VIRGINIA
Little Kanawha-
Hills
Chestnut
Ridge Plateau
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
49.
Gil pin
Westmoreland-
Gil pin
Gilpin-
Upshur
Gil pin Ridge
Gil pin-
Westmoreland
Westmoreland-
Gilpin-
Upshur (Meigs)-
Moshannon
Muskingum
Upshur (Meigs)
Gilpin-
Upshur Ridges
Muskingum-
Upshur
Vincent Terrace
Gilpin-
Upshur Hills
Dekalb Mountains
Dekalb-
Cookport Plateau
Ashby-
Gilpin Hills
Pope
Atkins
Tyler
Ashby
Dekalb-
Belmont Mountains
Belmont-
Limestone Sinks
Blago-
Belmont-
Clymer
Dekalb-
Lickdale Rocky
12.3
12.0
12.3
12.3
31.4
12.3
12.3
12.0
12.0
12.3
31.4
15.5
8.1
31.4
12.3
31.4
8.1
31.4
10.0
12.3
31.4
*
17.3
7.6
*
12.3
3.0
19.2
*
*
17.3
22.9
22.9
44.2
22.9
16.3
17.3
20.2
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
S
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SSI
SSI
NS+
SSI
NS+
NS+
NS°
NS0+
NS0+
SSI
NS0+
SSI
SSI
SSI
NS°
NS
NS
NS
NS
Mountain and Plateau
155
-------
WEST VIRGINIA
12. Raleigh-
Fayette Plateau
13. Ohio-
. West Virginia
Foothills
50. Atkins-
El kins-
Cranberry Glade
51. Dekalb-
Gilpin-
Wharton Plateau
52. Atkins-
Lickdale Glades
53. Dekalb Mountains
54. Dekalb
55. Muskingum-
Upshur (Meigs)
56. Wyatt-
Monongahela
Teays Valley
57. Huntington
Industrial Area
58. Wheeling-
Huntington-
Ashton-
Ohio River Terrace
and Bottomlands
59. Upshur-
Muskingum (Meigs)
clayhills
60. Monongahela-
Tyler and
Muskingum-
Upshur
Upper Flats
61. Ashton-
Melvin-
Zoar
Area of Kanawha River
62. Monongahela-
Tyler-
Wyatt
Moshannon
Terraces & bottomlands
of little Kanawha River
63. Brooke-
Westmoreland-
Upshur Limestone Hills
156
19.2
38.9
*
17.3
12.3
10.6
19.2
20.2
*
17.3
8.1
31.4
*
7.8
*
16.4
10.5
16.4
*
*
31.4
8.1
7.8
*
8.1
31.4
*
17.3
13.6
7.8
*
*
15.5
20.3
12.0
31.4
NS
NS
-
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
-
NS
SS
NS
_
-
NS
SS
SS
-
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
-
_
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
ssi
NS
ssi
NS
NS*
NS
NS
n
NS°
NS
NS
0*
NS
o
NS
0
+
-------
VIRGINIA
'*• Southern 64. Muskingum 8.1 SS SSI
West Virginia
Coal Fields 65. Sequatchie- * - wc.o
Monongahela 7.8 SS
Valley of Oceana
66. Muskingum and 8.1 SS
Muskingum- 8.1 SS SSI
Upshur (Meigs) 31.4 NS
* - above 15 CEC (not susceptible) ->• Not Susceptible
^- above 6 CEC (slightly susceptible) -»• Slightly Susceptible
^ - below 6 CED (susceptible) -> Susceptible
[No CEC available
^loodplain
Lime influenced
157
-------
WISCONSIN
Land Resource Soil Association
A. Soils of the
southwestern
ridges and valleys
1. Undulating, 1. Tama-
rolling, and Ashdale-
hilly soils on Downs-
limestone ridges Muscatine
with shale in
places. 2. Dodgeville-
Ashdale
Sogn
3. Dubuque-
Palsgrove-
Sogn-
Dodgeville
4. Schapville-
Derinda-
Vlasaty-
Calamine
2. Gently rolling to 5. Fayette-
very steep soils on Palsgrove-
limestone ridges or Dubuque
on quartzite uplands
6. Palsgrove-
Dubuque-
Fayette
7. Fayette-
Seaton
8. Seaton-
Palsgrove-
Dubuque
9. Dubuque-
Palsgrove
10. Baraboo-
Skillet
CEC Suscept.
Level
28.1
*
*
36.3
*
*
*
*
15.4
*
*
*
*
*
*
12.6
15.4
*
15.4
*
12.6
12.6
16.3
16.3
15.4
*
*
15.4
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
-
Assoc-
SuscePJ1
Rating
NS
»if*
NS
NS
NS
.tf
NS
.iC
NS
SS2
«iC
NS
NS
NS
158
-------
IN
3. Nearly level to
sloping soils on
stream terraces
11
12,
13.
Hilly to rolling
soils of moraines
and terrace
escarpments.
Richwood-
Toddville-
Bertrand
Bertrand-
Curran-
Arenzville-
Dakota-
Meridian
Tell-
Curran-
Ettrick
14. Qakota-
Onamia-
Waukegan
Antigo
Soils of the
Southeastern
Upland.
1. Hilly to rolling 15.
soils of drumlens,
moraines and
bedrock. 16.
17.
18.
Knowles-
Morley
Hocheim-
Theresa-
Brookston
Pecatonica-
Flagg-
Baraboo
Casco-
Rodman-
Fox-
Lapeer
3- Rolling to undu- 19. Ringwood-
lating soils of Durand-
glaciated uplands. Ripon
20. Dubuque-
Pecatonica-
McHenry-
Whalan
21
22.
Pecatonica-
Dodge-
McHenry-
Whalan
Lapeer-
McHenry-
Mi ami
22.5
*
*
*
*
*
*
6.2
*
*
*
*
7.0
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
*
15.7
*
*
31.3
*
*
*
*
*
14.2
*
24.0
*
*
*
*
17.5
*
*
16.2
17.5
*
*
17.5
17.0
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
NS
NS
NS
NS
159
-------
WISCONSIN
23. Morley-
Blount-
Varna-
Ashkum
24. Flagg-
Pecatonica-
Mingo
25. Miami-
McHenry-
Crosby-
Brookston
26. Theresa-
Hochheim-
Nenno
27. Mi ami-
Dodge-
Pella
28. McHenry
Lapeer-
Miami-
Brookston
29. Lapeer-
Pardeeville-
Boyer-
McHenry
30. Knowles-
Ripon-
Casco-
Sisson
31. Theresa-
Onaway-
Fox-
Salter
32. Fox-
Casco-
St. Charles
4. Gently undu- 33. Morley-
lating to rolling Blount-
soils of Ozaukee-
glaciated uplands Ashkum
34.
35.
Varma-
Elliott-
Ashkum
Ogle-
Durand-
Pella
15.7
20.8
34.0
44.2
*
*
*
17.0
17.5
20.3
31.3
*
*
*
17.0
16.2
*
17.5
*
17.0
31.3
*
11.3
*
17.5
*
*
*
*
*
15.1
14.2
*
14.2
*
*
15.7
20.8
20.6
44.2
34.0
*
44.2
*
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
160
-------
ISCONSIN
36. Plano-
Saybrook-
Ringwood-
Elburn-
Pell a
37. Miami-
McHenry-
Brookston
38. Theresa-
Hochheim-
Nenno
39. St. Charles-
Dodge-
Miami-
Pella
40. Metea-
Puchyan-
Miami-
Lapeer
41. Lomira-
LeRoy-
Knowles
42. Lapeer-
Pardeeville-
McHenry
43. Dodge-
Lomi ra-
Knowles
44. Fox-
Casco-
Boyer
45. Fox-
Will-
Casco-
Fabius
Nearly level and 46. Plano-
gently undulating St. Charles-
soils of outwash Warsaw-
plains and Fox
uplands.
47. Fox
Hebron-
Del Rey
48. Fox
St. Charles
McHenry
25.4
*
24.0
*
*
17.0
17.5
31.3
*
*
*
*
16.2
17.0
*
*
*
17.0
*
*
*
*
*
11.3
17.5
16.2
*
*
14.2
*
*
14.2
*
*
*
25.4
*
25.9
14.2
14.2
*
*
14.2
*
17.5
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
-
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
SS2
NS
NS
NS
161
-------
WISCONSIN
C. Soils of the
Central Sandy Up-
lands and Plains
1. Rolling, hilly
undulating, and
nearly level
soils of up-
lands and plains
49. Oshtemo-
Gotham-
Plainfield
50. Mecan-
Wyocena-
Plainfi eld-
Gotham
51. Plainfield-
Gotham-
Wyocena
2. Nearly level and 52.
undulating soils
of plains with
included hilly
and steep out-
liers of sandstone.
3. Nearly level and 53.
gently undulating
soils of stream
terraces and long
narrow outwash 54.
plains.
55.
56.
Nearly level and
undulating soils
of broad outwash
plains.
58.
59.
Boone-
Plainfield
Au Gres-
Nekoosa
Sparta-
Pi ainfi eld-
Gotham
Plainfield-
Sparta-
Gotham
Meridian-
Plainfield-
Sparta-
Shiffer
Sparta-
Dakota-
Meridian
57. Dakota-
Onamia-
Meridian-
Burkhardt
Plainfield-
Kellner-
Newton
Plainfield-
Gotham
60. Nekoosa-
Plainfield-
Newton
6.3
*
5.5
4.0
*
5.5
*
5.5
*
*
5.3
5.5
11.2
*
7.0
5.5
5.5
7.0
*
6.2
5.5
7.0
*
7.0
*
6.2
*
7.0
6.2
5.5
6.6
*
5.5
*
*
5.5
*
SS
ss
s
s
s
s
ss
s
ss
s
s
s
ss
ss
s
ss
s
ss
ss
ss
s
ss
ss
ss
NS
ss
NS
ss
ss
ss
s
ss
ss
s
ss
s
ss
SSI
S2
S2
52
ssi
ssi
ssi
SS2
SS2
ssi
S2
ssi
162
-------
WISCONSIN
61. Nekoosa- *
Morocco- * NS SSI
Granby- * NS
Plain-Meld 5.5 S
62. Plainfield- 5.5 S
Nekoosa- * - SSI
Newton * SS
63. Plainfield- 5.5 S
Richford- 3.3 S
Kellner- 6.6 SS ^
Dakota * NS
64. Dakota- * NS N$
Onamia 7.0 SS
65. Guenther- * SS
Dancy- * MS
Nekoosa- *
Newton * SS
66. Delton- * NS
Alban- * NS NS
Wyeville * NS
Soils of the Western
Sandstone Uplands, Valley
Slopes, and Plains.
1. Steep to rolling 67. Gale- * SS
soils on partially Norden- 15.7 NS
dissected uplands Hixton- * SS
underlain by sand- Fayette- 12.6 SS
stone and some Seaton 16.3 NS
limestone.
2. Hilly, rolling 68. Norden- 15.7 NS
and steep soils on Gale- * SS SS2
dissected sandstone Fayette- 12.6 SS
uplands. Hixton * SS
69. Gale- * SS
Norden- 15.7 NS SS2
Fayette 12.6 SS
70. Norden- 15.7 NS
Hixton- * SS
Northfield- * NS
Boone 5.3 S
71. Hixton- * SS
Northfield- * NS ssl
Gale- * SS
Boone 5.3 S
163
-------
WISCONSIN
72.
Boone-
Northfield
73. Hixton-
Arland-
Gale-
Norden
Gently rolling 74.
and rolling soils
on sandstone
uplands.
75.
Nearly level and
undulating soils
on sandstone
plains.
Merrillan-
Boone-
Northfield-
Elm Lake-
Arland
Hixton-
Gale-
Northfield-
Arland-
Milaca
76. Hixton-
Onanria-
Chetek
77. Elm Lake-
Merrill an-
Humbird-
Boone-
Northfield
78. Merrillan-
Elm Lake-
Humbird
79. Kert-
Vesper-
Veedum
Soils of the
Northern and Eastern
Sandy and Loamy Reddish
drift Uplands and
Plains.
1. Soils of rolling
to undulating
uplands.
80.
81
Emmet-
Onaway-
Omega
Onaway-
Solona-
Emmet-
Underhill-
Angelica
5.3
*
*
6.3
*
15.7
*
5.3
*
*
6.3
*
*
*
6.3
8.3
*
7.0
*
*
*
*
5.3
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
S
NS
ss
ss
ss
NS
NS
S
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
ss
ss
ss
ss
NS
NS
SS
S
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
ss
5.0
15.1
9.7
15.1
*
5.0
*
*
S
NS
SS
NS
NS
S
NS
NS
S2
SSI
NS
SSI
ssi
NS
SS2
ssi
16A
-------
WISCONSIN
2.
Soils of
undulating
uplands.
82. Emmet-
Onaway-
Solona-
Angelica-
Omega
83. Onaway-
Underhill-
Emmet-
Alban-
Solona
84. Solona-
Onaway-
Hortonville-
Shiocton-
Angelica
85. Longrie-
Summerville-
Onaway-
Bonduel
86. Onaway-
Longrie-
Detour
3. Soils of nearly
level plains.
87.
88.
91
Shiocton-
Tristin-
Shawano-
Oshkosh-
Poygan
Underhill
Onaway-
Angelica-
Wauseon
89. Delton-
Wyeville
Poygan
90. Tustin-
Shiocton
Kibbie
Shawano-
Keowns-
Granby-
AuGres
92. Shawano-
Granby
5.0
15.1
*
*
9.7
15.1
*
5.0
*
*
*
15.1
*
*
*
*
*
15.1
*
15.1
*
*
*
*
*
30.6
54.2
*
15.1
*
*
*
*
54.2
*
*
*
*
*
*
11.2
*
*
S
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
S
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS2
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS2
SSI
165
-------
WISCONSIN
F. Soils of the
Northern Silty
Uplands and Plains,
1. Soils of
rolling to
undulating
uplands.
93. Lafont-
Cl if ford
Auburndale
94. Santiago-
Free r-
Milaca-
Cable
95. Freeon-
Freer-
Almena-
Adolph
96. Norrie-
Kennan-
Onamia
97.
98.
99.
2.
Soils of
undulating
uplands.
101
102.
Stambaugh-
Goodman-
Padus-
Iron River
Antigo-
Norrie-
Onamia-
Kennan
Cushing-
Alstad-
Bluffton
100. Jewett-
Waukegan-
Dakota
103.
Clifford-
Auburndale
Santiago-
Freeon-
Freer-
Mi1aca-
Dable
Loyal-
Withee-
Arland-
Marshfield
22.9
*
20.2
12.5
*
8.3
*
*
*
19.8
36.7
*
*
7.0
*
*
*
*
*
*
7.0
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
20.2
12.5
*
*
8.3
*
*
13.8
6.3
26.0
NS
NS
NS
SS
. NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
-
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS2
NS
NS
NS
SS2
NS
NS
NS
SS2
SS2
166
-------
WISCONSIN
104. Spencer- 20.8 NS
Almena- 19.8 NS wc;
Auburndale- 20.2 NS IXi
Adolph 36.7 NS
105. Renova- * NS
Ostrander- * NS N<;
Sargent- * NS IMi
Floyd * NS
106. Fenwood- * NS
Marathon- * NS .,<,
Rozellville- * NS INi
Cable * SS
107. Rozellville- * NS
Marathon- * NS No
Rietbrock- * NS
Meade *
108. Stambaugh- * SS
Radus- * NS NS
Iron River * NS
109. Antigo- * SS
Onamia- 7.0 SS
Brill- * SS
Poskin * NS
3. Soils of nearly 110. Clifford- * NS N<.
level plains. Auburndale 20.2 NS
111. Clifford- * NS
Lafont- 22.9 NS NS
Auburndale 20.2 NS
112. Freer- * NS
Freeon- * NS M<-
Almena- 19.8 NS
Auburndale 20.2 NS
113. Wither- 13.8 SS
Marshfield- 26.0 NS NS
36.7 NS
114. Almena- 19.8 NS
Auburndale- 20.2 NS NS
Spencer 20'. 8 NS
115. Dolph- * NS Ns
Altdorf * NS wa
116. Stambaugh- * SS
Padus- * NS
Pence- * SS
Iron River * NS
167
-------
WISCONSIN
117. Antigo-
BrillI-
Onamia
118.
G. Soils of the
Northern Loamy
Uplands and
Plains.
1. Soils of hilly,
rolling, to
undulating
uplands.
Poskin-
Brill-
Antigo-
Onamia
119. Gogebic-
Iron River
120. Iron River-
Pence-
Goodman-
Monico-
Stambaugh
121. Iron River-
Pence-
Vilas
122. Milaca-
Cloquet-
Pence-
Vilas
123. Kennan-
Iron River-
Pence-
Vilas
124. Kennan-
Wyocena-
Onamia
125.
126.
Padus-
Pence-
Vilas
Chetek-
Scandia-
Omega
2. Soils of rolling 127. Gogebic-
to undulating
uplands with
some broad
valleys.
Marenisco-
Ahmeek
128. Gogebic-
Marenisco-
Ahmeek-
Cable
*
*
7.0
*
*
*
7.0
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
8.3
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7.0
*
*
*
*
*
9.7
*
*
*
*
*
*
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
NS
mm
SS
NS
NS
NS
_
NS
SS
SSI
SS2
NS
NS
SS2
SSI
NS
NS
SS2
NS
NS
168
-------
WISCONSIN
3. Soils of
undulating
uplands.
129. Iron River-
Padus-
Pence-
Vilas
130. Cloquet-
Gogebic-
Pence
131. Milaca-
Cloquet-
Iron River-
Cable
132. Kennan-
Iron River-
Pence
133. Kennan-
Wyocena-
Onamia-
Bevent
134. Padus-
Pence-
Omega-
Stambaugh
135. Pence-
Cloquet-
Stambaugh
136. Pence-
Vilas
137. Onamia-
Chetek-
Dakota
138. Gogebic-
Iron River-
Cloquet-
VIlas-
Cable
139. Iron River-
Gobebic-
Cable
140. Milaca-
Cloquet-
Santiago-
Freer-
Cable
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
8.3
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7.0
*
*
*
9.7
*
*
*
*
*
*
7.0
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
8.3
*
12.5
*
*
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS2
SS2
SS2
NS
NS
SS2
SSI
SSI
NS
SS2
NS
SSI
169
-------
WISCONSIN
141.
143.
4. Soils of nearly
level plains,
pitted and un-
pitted.
H. Soils of the
Northern Sandy
Uplands and
Plains.
1. Soils of hilly
to rolling
uplands.
2.
3.
Soils of
rolling
uplands.
Soils of
undulating
uplands.
Iron River-
Gogebic-
Monico-
Marenisco
142. Kennan-
Wyocena-
Onamia
144.
145.
146.
Pence-
Padus-
Stambaugh-
Vilas-
Omega
Onamia-
Chetek-
Antigo
Pence-
Vilas-
Stambaugh-
Padus-
Onamia-
Chetek-
Antigo
147.
148.
Vilas-
Omega-
Hiawatha-
Pence
Vilas-
Omega-
Hiawatha
149. Vilas
Omega-
Hiawatha-
Pence
150.
Omega-
Vilas-
Pence
*
*
*
*
*
*
7.0
*
*
*
*
9.7
7.0
*
*
*
*
*
*
7.0
*
*
9.7
*
*
*
9.7
*
9.7
*
*
9.7
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
SSI
SS2
ssi
SS2
ssi
ssi
ssi
ssi
170
-------
flCONSIN
4. Soils of
nearly level
plains.
151. Vilas-
Omega-
Pence
152.
153.
Omega-
Vilas-
Chetek-
Pence
Pence-
Omega-
Au Gres
Soils of the
Northern and
Eastern Clayey
and Loamy Reddish
M ft Uplands and
pUins.
1. Soils of rolling 154. Hibbing-
to hilly uplands. Leonidas-
Superior-
Ogemaw
155. Hibbing-
Pickford-
Ontonagon
Bi bon
156. Kolberg-*
Summervill e-
Kewaunee
157. Kewaunee-
Hortonville-
Manawa-
Poygan
158. Mortonville-
Kewaunee-
Manawa-
Poygan
159. Onaway-
Theresa-
Hortonville-
Fox-
Casco
Soils of rolling
to undulating
uplands.
*
9.7
*
9.7
*
*
*
9.7
11.2
SS
SS
SS
SS
SS
NS
SS
SS
SS
SS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
18.4
18.4
*
37.4
54.2
*
18.4
37.4
54.2
15.1
*
*
14.2
*
NS
•.
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SSI
SSI
SSI
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
171
-------
WISCONSIN
3. Soils of 160. Nibbing- * NS
undulating Leonidas- * _ <,
plains. Gogebic- * NS
Bibon * SS
161. Hibbing- * NS
Rudyard- * NS
Pickford- * NS
Hiawatha *
NS
162. Superior- * NS
Orienta- * NS
Pickford- * NS NS
Mam's tee- * SS
Hiawatha *
163. Kewaunee- 18.4 NS
Manawa- 37.4 NS NS
Poygan 54.2 NS
164. Kewaunee- 18.4 NS
Manawa- 37.4 NS NS
Poygan 54.2 NS
165. Kewaunee- 18.4 NS w$
Manawa 37.4 NS
166. Kewaunee- 18.4 NS
Manawa- 37.4 NS
Poygan- 54.2 NS NS
Hortonville- * NS
Tustin * NS
167. Manawa- 37.4 NS
Poygan- 54.2 NS N
Rimer- * NS
Tustin * NS
168. Kewaunee- 18.4 NS
Kolberg- * NS NS
Manawa 37.4 NS
169. Hortonville- * NS
Manawa- 37.4 NS ^5
Poygan- 54.2 NS
Shiocton * NS
170. Briggsville- * NS
Poygan- 54.2 NS #S
Tustin- * NS
Lapeer * NS
172
-------
fSCONSIN
4. Soils of
nearly level
plains.
171
172.
173.
174.
Soils of the
Stream Bottoms
Major Wetlands.
1. Soils of
nearly level
bottoms, with
local cutbanks.
Hibbing-
Rudyard-
Pickford-
Ontonagon-
Superior
Ontonagon-
Hibbing-
Rudyard-
Kewaunee-
Oshkosh-
Manawa-
Poygan
Oshkosh-
Manawa-
Poygan-
Tustin-
175. Braham-
Blomford-
Oalbo
176. Arenzville-
Orion-
Ettrick
177. Wet alluvial soils
178.
Granby-
Shawano-
Emmet
179. Newton-
Plainfield-
Morocco
180. Newton-
Morocco-
Au Gres
181. Cable-
Monico-
Auburndale-
Freer
182. Wauseon-
Keowns-
Tustin-
Rimer
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
18.
30.
37.
54.
30.6
37.4
54.2
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
4.3
5.5
*
*
*
11.2
20.2
*
*
*
*
*
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
ss
s
ss
s
ss
ss
ss
ss
ss
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SSI
SSI
SSI
NS
NS
173
-------
WISCONSIN
183.
184.
3. Wet organic
soils of nearly
level plains.
188.
189.
190,
Pel la-
Brooks ton-
Virgil
Matherton-
Will-
Pella
185. Navan-
Hebron-
Aztalan-
Pella
186. Zittau-
Poygan-
Poy-
Borth
187. Moss peat over acid
sedge and woody peat soils-
Au Gres-
Cable
Raw acid sedge and woody
peat soils with thin moss
covering-
Cable-
Freer
Acid sedge peat and muck
soils-
Au Gres-
Newton-
Morocco
*
31.3
*
*
•k
*
*
*
*
*
54.2
*
*
11.2
*
*
*
*
it
11.2
*
*
Slightly acid to alkaline
sedge and woody peat and muck
soils- *
Pel la- *
Poygan- 54.2
Brookston 31.3
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SS
SS
NS
SS
NS
NS
SS
SS
SS
NS
NS
NS
NS
NS
SSI
NS
NS
NS
NS
ssz
NS
174
-------
APPENDIX B
Sources of Soil Information
Allen, G. W. 1974. Soil Survey of Chittenden County, Vermont. U.S. Dept.
of Agriculture in cooperation with Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station
and Vermont Dept. of Forests and Parks.
Byrd, H. J., Phillip L. Tant, and R. E. Morton. 1974. General Soil Map of
North Carolina. 1:1,000,000. Engineer Agency for Resources Inventories.
U.S. Army Engineer Topographic Laboratories.
Cline, M. G. and R. L. Marshall. 1977. General Soil Map of New York State.
1:500,000. Cornell University Agriculture Experiment Station.
Cline, M. G. and R. L. Marshall. 1977. Soils of New York Landscapes,
Information Bulletin 119. New York State College of Agriculture and Life
Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York. 61 p.
Cunningham, R. L.» E. J. Ciolkosz, G. W. Petersen, R. P. Mateski, R. Pennock,
Jr., R. F. Shipp, A. D. Kuhl, I. W. Ratcliff, Jr., G. H. Lipscomb, W. N.
Peechatka, and A. Schadel. 1977. Soils of Pennsylvania Progress Report 365.
1:750,000. Pennsylvania State University College of Agriculture, Ag. Exp. Sta.,
University Park, Pennsylvania. 24 p.
Elder, J. A. and M. E. Springer. 1978. General Soil Map Tennessee. 1:750,000.
S.C.S. - Tennessee Ag. Exp. Sta. - U.S.D.A.
Epperson, G. R., S. S. Obenshain, H. C. Porter, and R. E. Devereaux. 1958.
Soils of Virginia. V.P.I, and U.S.D.A. Coop. Ext. Bulletin 203. Blacksburg,
VA. 17 p.
Fehrenbacher, J. B., G. D. Walker, and H. L. Wascher. 1967. Soils of Illinois,
University of Illinois College of Agriculture, Ag. Exp. Sta. S.C.S. - U.S.D.A.
47 p.
Ferwerda, John A. and Robert V. Rourke, and Kenneth J. LaFlamme. 1978. The
Soils of Maine. Life Sciences and Ag. Exp. Sta. - S.C.S. - U.S.D.A. University
of Maine, Orono, Maine. 37 p.
Florida Ag. Exp. Sta. - S.'C.S. - U.S.D.A. 1962. General Soil Map of Florida.
Geologic Survey, USDI, 1969. National Atlas - Soils - Sheet No. 86, Wash., DC.
"Distribution of Principal Kinds of Soils: Orders, Suborders, and Great Groups."
Geologic Survey, USDI, 1970. The National Atlas of the United States of America,
Washington, DC. p. 159.
175
-------
Geologic Survey, USDI, 1972. United States Map, 1:2,500,000. Denver. East Hall
Gonick, W. N. 1978. General Soil Map of Connecticut 1:250,000. U.S.D.A. -
S.C.S. - Conn. Ag. Exp. Sta., Storrs. Ag. Exp. Sta.
Griggs, J. E. 1971. Soil Survey of Addison County, Vermont. U.S. Dept.
of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service in cooperation
with Vermont Agricultural Experiment Station and Vermont Dept. of Forests
and Parks.
Hallbick, D. C. and B. R. Smith. 1979. General Soil Map South Carolina.
1:750,000. South Carolina Ag. Exp. Sta., Clemson University, Clemson, South
Carolina, U.S.D.A. - S.C.S.
Hanson, G. F. 1968. Soils of Wisconsin. Scale 1:710,000 U. of Wisconsin,
Madison, Wisconsin.
Jencks, E. M. 1969. Some Chemical Characteristics of the Major Soil Series
of West Virginia. West Virginia University Ag. Exp. Sta. Bulletin 582T. 27 p.
Lytle, S. A. and M. P. Sturgis. 1962. General Soil Areas and Associated Soil
Series Groups of Louisiana. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and
Mechanical College, Ag. Exp. Sta.
Miller, Fred P. 1975. Maryland Soils, Extension Bulletin 212. Cooperative
Extension Service. University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland. 42 p.
Sheehan, W. I. 1978. Soil Survey of Orange County, Vermont. U.S. Dept. of
Agriculture in cooperation with Vermont Agency of Environmental Conservation
and Vermont Agriculture Experiment Station.
Smith, F. B., R. G. Leighty, R. E. Caldwell, V. W. Carlisle, L. G. Thompson,
Jr., and T. C. Matthews. 1973. Principal Soil Areas of Florida. U. of
Florida, Institute of Food and Ag. Sci. Ag. Exp. Sta. U.S.D.A. 64 p.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1967. Soil Survey Laboratory Data and
Descriptions for Some Soils of Mississippi. No. 13.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1967. Soil Survey Laboratory Data and
Descriptions for Some Soils of Kentucky. No. 14.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1967. Soil Survey Laboratory Data and
Descriptions for Some Soils of Tennessee. No. 15.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1967. Soil Survey Laboratory Data and
Descriptions for Some Soils of Georgia, North Carolina, and South Carolina.
No. 16.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1967. Soil Survey Laboratory Data and
Descriptions for Some Soils of Wisconsin. No. 17.
176
-------
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1968. Soil Survey Laboratory Data and
Descriptions for Some Soils of New England States. No. 20.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1969. Soil Survey Laboratory Data and
Descriptions for Some Soils of Alabama and Florida. No. 22.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1974. Soil Survey Laboratory Data and
Descriptions for Some Soils of New York. Cornell University. No. 25.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1974. Soil Survey Laboratory Data and
Descriptions for Some Soils of New Jersey. No. 26.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1974. Soil Survey Laboratory Data and
Descriptions for Some Soils of Pennsylvania. No. 27.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. and Alabama Ag. Exp. Sta. 1974. General
Soil Map - State of Alabama 1:500,000. Auburn.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1975. Soil Associations of Alabama.
Agronomy and Soils Dept. Series No. 24. Ag. Exp. Sta., Auburn University. 30 p.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1973. General Soil Map Delaware.
1:335,238. Delaware Ag. Exp. Sta.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. Purdue University Ag. Exp. Sta. and
Cooperative Extension Service. 1977. Soil Associations of Indiana. 1:2,000,000.
West Lafayette, Indiana.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. Kentucky Ag. Exp. Sta. Division of Conser-
vation, Department for Natural Resources and Environmental Protection. 1975.
General Soil Map of Kentucky. 1:750,000. Soil Conservation Service,
Lexington, Kentucky.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1975. General Soil Map of Massachusetts.
Veatch, J. 0. 1953. Soil Map of Michigan. 1:750,000. Michigan State
College Press. East Lansing, Michigan.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry
Exp. Sta. 1974. General Soil Map State of Mississippi. 1:750,000.
Mississippi State Department of Agricultural and Commerce.
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. University of Rhode Island Agricultural
Exp. Sta. 1978. General Soil Map State of Rhode Island. 1:100,000.
U.S.D.A. - S.C.S., Hyattsville, Maryland.
Soil Conservation, U.S.D.A. 1973. Land Resource Map of West Virginia.
U.S.D.A. - S.C.S., Hyattsville, Maryland.
177
-------
Soil Conservation Service, U.S.D.A. 1978. Classification of Soil Series of
the United States.
Soil Survey Staff. 1977. Soil Characterization in Indiana: II. 1967-1973-
Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station and the U.S.D.A., S.C.S.
Purdue University Ag. Exp. Sta. Bulletin 174. West Lafayette, Indiana.
Soil Survey Staff. 1978. Soil Characterization in Indiana: III. 1974-1976-
Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station and the U.S.D.A., S.C.S.
Purdue University Ag. Exp. Sta. Bulletin No. 175. West Lafayette, Indiana.
Soil Survey Staff. 1979. Soil Characterization in Indiana: IV. 1976-1977-
Purdue University Agricultural Experiment Station and the U.S.D.A., S.C.S.
Purdue University Ag. Exp. Sta. Bulletin No. 222. West Lafayette, Indiana.
Perkins, H. F. and M. E. Shaffer. 1977. Soil Associations and Land Use
Potential of Georgia Soils. 1:750,000. Georgia Ag. Exp. Sta. - U.S.D.A. -
S.C.S. Athens, Georgia.
Ritchie, A. 1973. Know Ohio's Soil Regions. 1:500,000. Ohio Department
of Natural Resources, Division of Lands and Soils. Columbus, Ohio.
178
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
REPORT NO.
EPA-600/3-80-013
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
••TITLE AND SUBTITLE
5. REPORT DATE
Sensitivity of Soil Regions to Acid Precipitation
January 1980 issuing date
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
'• AUTHOR
------- |