EPA-650/2-75-003
JANUARY 1975
Environmental Protection  Technology Series
                                                 > * • • i i i t i
                                            d^i^jiislVipiicri.tn
                                                         k K

-------
                          EPA-650/2-75-003
   SEMINAR SUMMARY:
SAMPLING  AND  ANALYSIS
 OF THE VARIOUS  FORMS
  OF ATMOSPHERIC LEAD
               by

           Carole R. Sawicki

      Chemistry and Physics Laboratory
    National Environmental Research Center
    Office of Research and Development
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711

           January 1975

-------
                          EPA REVIEW NOTICE

This report has been reviewed by the National Environmental Research
Center - Research Triangle Park, Office of Research and Development,
EPA, and approved for publication. Approval does not signify that the
contents necessarily reflect the views and policies of the Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial
products constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                      RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S . Environ-
mental Protection Agency, have been grouped into series.  These broad
categories were established to facilitate further development and applica-
tion of environmental technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was
consciously planned to foster technology transfer and maximum interface
in related fields.  Thefe series  are:

          1. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH'fiFFECTS RESEARCH
          2. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIGN~TECHNOLOGY
          3. ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH
          4. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
          5. SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
          6. SCIENTIFIC AND  TECHNICAL ASSESSMENT REPORTS
          9. MISCELLANEOUS

This report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
TECHNOLOGY series.  This series describes  research performed to
develop and demonstrate instrumentation, equipment and methodology
to repair or prevent environmental degradation from point and non-
point sources of pollution.  This work provides the  new  or improved
technology required fcr the control and treatment of pollution sources
to meet environmental quality standards.
This document is ava: .able to the public for sale through the National
Technical Information Service, Springfield,  Virginia 22161.
                                   11

-------
                         CONTENTS

                                                              Page
INTRODUCTION	1
PRESENTATIONS	3
   JAMES W. ROBINSON — LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY	3
   R.K.  SKOGERBOE — COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY   	3
   REED ROBERTSON AND JAMES HICKEY — NALCO
    CHEMICAL COMPANY	5
   GARY TER HAAR AND MANUEL BRANDT  -- ETHYL CORPORATION  ... 6
   RALPH PAROD — ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LABORATORIES, INC. ... 8
   E.S. JACOBS — DuPONT COMPANY	9
   CLAIR C- PATTERSON -- CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY.  . 10
DISCUSSION	11
CONCLUSIONS  	12
                               111

-------
                              ERRATA
                               FOR
     SEMINAR SUMMARY:  SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF THE VARIOUS
                    FORMS OF ATMOSPHERIC LEAD
                          EPA-650/2-75-003

     Replace p. iii with the following corrected Table of Contents.
                             CONTENTS

                                                              Page
INTRODUCTION	   1
PRESENTATIONS	   3
   JAMES W. ROBINSON — LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY	   3
   R.K.  SKOGERBOE — COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY   	   4
   REED ROBERTSON AND JAMES HICKEY — NALCO
    CHEMICAL COMPANY	   6
   GARY TER HAAR AND MANUEL BRANDT — ETHYL CORPORATION  . .   7
   RALPH PAROD — ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH LABORATORIES, INC.  . .   9
   E.S. JACOBS — DuPONT COMPANY	10
   CLAIR C. PATTERSON — CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY. .  11
   BENJAMIN Y.H. LIU ~ UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA	  12
DISCUSSION	13
CONCLUSIONS   	14
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA SHEET	15
                               111

-------
                   SEMINAR  SUMMARY:
 SAMPLING  AND  ANALYSIS OF  THE VARIOUS  FORMS
                  OF  ATMOSPHERIC  LEAD
                       INTRODUCTION

      Scientists at the Environmental Protection Agency's National
Environmental Research  Center, located in the Research Triangle Park,
N.C. , have long been interested in the analysis of atmospheric pollutants.
Of special interest are those hazardous substances  found in fairly high
concentrations in  blood samples obtained from high-risk groups in  various
parts of the country.  One such pollutant—well known for its toxicity—is
lead, which was the subject of an informal,  day-long  seminar  at the  EPA
facility on September 16, 1974.

      The objectives of this seminar were twofold:  (1) to provide a
useful and timely review  of current methods for sampling and analyzing
atmospheric lead;  and (2) to consider  the latest research data by  Drs.
Robinson and Skogerboe which  suggest that large quantities of lead pass
through the filters presently being used to measure lead in the  air.

      The seminar,  entitled Sampling  and Analysis of the Various Forms
of Atmospheric Lead, included oral presentations by ten prominent
scientists knowledgeable in the problem  area.  A question-and-answer
session was held after each presentation. This report is a summary of
those informal presentations. The names of the participants and their
affiliations are listed below.

 1.    James W. Robinson, Professor of Chemistry, Louisiana State Univer-
      sity, Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

-------
2.    R.K. Skogerboe, Professor of Chemistry and Atmospheric Science,
      Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado.

3.    Rred Robertson, Senior Group Leader of the Environmental Services
      Laboratory, Nalco Chemical Co. , Chicago, Illinois.

4.    James Hickey, Director of Analytical Services Dept. ,  Nalco Chemical
      Co. , Chicago, Illinois.

5.    Gary Ter Haar, Senior Research Associate, Petroleum Chemicals
      Research, Ethyl Corp. , Detroit, Michigan.

6.    Manuel Brandt, Superintendent of Chemical Analysis , Petroleum
      Chemicals Research, Ethyl Corp., Detroit, Michigan.

7.    Ralph Parod, Ph.D. candidate in Physiology  at Wayne State University,
      (Represented Environmental Health Laboratories, Inc. , Farmington,
      Michigan.)

8.    E.S. Jacobs, Superintendent of Automotive Emissions Division ,
      DuPont Petroleum Laboratory, Deepwater, New Jersey.

9.    Clair C. Patterson, Senior Research Associate., Geochemistry
      Division of Geological and Planetary Sciencies, California Institute
      of Technology, Pasadena, California.

10.    Benjamin Y.H.  Liu, Professor and Director,  Particle  Technology
      Laboratory,  Mechanical Engineering Dept. , University  of Minnesota,
      Minneapolis,  Minnesota.

-------
                             PRESENTATIONS

James W. Robinson — Louisiana State University
      The instrument used for the determination of particulate and molecular
atmospheric lead was described by Dr. Robinson as being a flameless atomic
absorption device equipped with a 10-mm Micropore carbon disc (0.01-ym pore
size)  on the inlet port to filter the particulates,  followed by an atomizer
carbon bed to adsorb the molecular species.  Dr. Robinson discussed data
on particulate and molecular lead collected on 5 separate days with this
instrument.  Feasibility studies were carried out on 2 days to see if there
was a detectable correlation between atmospheric molecular lead concentra-
tion and automobile traffic density.  The next 3  days were "all-day" runs
to ascertain any diurnal pattern of lead concentration fluctuation.
      The results of the  experiments described above showed that near a
parking lot a large proportion of the lead was molecular (in the vapor
phase,  as opposed to extremely small particles) . In addition,
Dr. Robinson presented slides which showed that the diurnal maxima for
molecular lead corresponded to peak traffic periods, and that during
windless, high-humidity conditions, the molecular lead built up to very
high concentrations (>50 yg/m^) . Dr. Robinson's explanation for this
phenomenon was that lead from the exhaust deposits on the road and is
then volatized under  appropriate conditions of sunlight and humidity.
      The speaker indicated that the data obtained on lead by the collection
of particulates from the air with the use of high-volume samplers present
only a partial atmospheric profile because the concentration of the molecu-
lar species of the metal is ignored.  Further, the speaker pointed out that
he has also found  "molecular" compounds of cadmium, arsenic, zinc, and
selenium using the collection system described, and that these molecular
pollutants might also  exist in concentrations significantly higher than are
currently known.  Dr. Robinson concluded that much more work needs
to be done before recommendations are made.

-------
    I^.K^ Skogerboe — Colorado State University
      Dr. Skogerboe described a number of experiments to determine
filter collection efficiencies for several elements, including lead.  Initial
field experiments set up at various distances from a busy street in Fort
Collins, Colorado, used sampling trains  consisting of a millipore filter
(0.45-pm pore size) and two nitric acid scrubbers connected in series.
The sampling  trains were operated simultaneously and continuously for
an average of  8 hours/day at a constant flow rate of 1 liter/minute,
which corresponds to a total air volume of 0.48 m'.  Atomic absorption
spectroscopy using the carbon rod was the method used for sample
analysis.  Results indicated that, based on finding lead in  the nitric
acid scrubbers, lead collection efficiencies on the filter decreased at
greater distances from the street.  Intrigued by studies of Spurny et al. ,
who showed that membrane filters tend to pass some  of the aerosols in
the 0.1- to 0.4-ym range, Dr. Skogerboe made some lead measurements
and systematically varied the face velocity.  The results indicated drop-
off in collection efficiency with increasing face velocity.
      Then the speaker described the use of a condensation nucleii
counter to check filter efficiencies.  No particles were detected coming
through the filters. New sampling trains were set up consisting of a
millipore filter (0.45-ym pore size) backed by a graphite filter and a
nitric acid scrubber and using the same  rate and time as mentioned pre-
viously. From 2 to 30 percent of the total lead was found in the charcoal
traps, and greater percentages were found in the scrubbers (6 to 53 per-
cent) , depending on the distance from the street.  Dr. Skogerboe  concluded
from these results that the lead reaching the scrubbers must be organic
(gaseous) , which  is either not trapped by activated  charcoal or, if it is trapped,
gets"oluted" from the charcoal by the air stream.  He also presented data
indicating that iron and cadmium get through the filters.
      Dr. Skogerboe also discussed work that was done prior to the
field sampling experiments to  determine  the extent of the lead blank in

-------
the millipore and graphite filters and in the nitric acid. These values
were as follows:

      Millipore filter                     0.082 + 0.010 yg Pb/filter
      Graphite filter                           <0.001  yg Pb/filter
      Acid  scrubber [HNO3/H2O (1:1 v/v)]     0.00042 ug Pb/ml

Comparing  these levels to the data collected  in the field  experiments
showed that concentrations well in excess of the blank levels were
collected.
    Dr. Skogerboe presented four  graphs depicting the correlations
between membrane filter efficiencies  and filter loading for Pb ,  Fe,
and  Cd collected at a constant flow rate.  The results showed  that as
the filter  load increased, the collection efficiency increased, possibly
due  to the decrease in pore  size of the filter because of loading.
    Dr. Skogerboe  concluded with the statement  that he  plans  to
conduct further studies intended to give more definitive  explanations
for what he has  observed.

-------
Reed Robertson and James Hick^y — Nalco Chemical Company

      The  sampling train  described  by Mr. Robertson  consisted of a
glass  fiber or  membrane filter, an activated carbon scrubber, and two
impingers in series containing  either nitric acid in both or nitric acid
in the  first and iodine monochloride in the second.  This system  was
used to collect a minimum of 15 to 20 cubic meters of air in 24 hours.
High-purity nitrogen and  pre-filtered laboratory air were used to
determine average  blank values.   Lead was  added to the activated
carbon in both laboratory and  field  tests,  and recovery  studies were
performed.  A known amount of organic lead vapor was generated, and
this was collected by  the  sampling train.  Following analysis of the  sam-
ples,  recovery percentages were calculated.  Efficiencies of the nitric
acid scrubber  and  iodine  monochloride scrubber for organic lead were
evaluated by using  the  sampling  train with the activated carbon scrubber
removed.
      Based on the results of the studies  outlined, the speakers drew
the following conclusions.  Lead  found in  blanks (equivalent to 0.06
yg/m  ) is  insignificant  with large samples (20 m^) of air.   Glass
fiber filters pass less than 2 percent of the  total lead  catch,  and
millipore filters pass less than 1  percent.   No lead was  found on  the acti-
vated carbon trap or in the nitric acid or iodine monochloride impingers;
but if  any  were found,  it would  be  less than the amount in the blanks.
The ASTM procedure  for treating activated charcoal recovers lead added
to carbon, 98 to 102 percent by material balance.  An iodine monochloride
scrubber is much more efficient for  collecting lead than is  a nitric  acid
scrubber.   The use of glass  fiber filters in conjunction with high
volumes of sample  represents  the most  efficient sampling technique
availaMe at the present state-of-the-art, according to  Mr. Robertson.

-------
Gary  Ter Haar and Manuel Brandt — Ethyl Corporation

    Mr.  Ter Haar  described  a filtration system for atmospheric lead
which consisted of a glass fiber or membrane filter followed by activated
carbon and a pair of scrubbers, one containing 3N  nitric acid and the
other empty.  Samples were taken in parallel at 0.75 and 15 liters/minute
for 24 hours at three locations.  In another filtration study (flow rate
0.75 liter/minute) membrane and glass fiber filters were followed by
activated carbon  and a liquid nitrogen trap.  In another study the effi-
ciency of Mine Safety Appliance (MSA) activated carbon (Stock No. 24207)
for tetraethyl lead (TEL) or tetramethyl lead (TML) was tested.
    Lead in each sample was  determined by atomic absorption after
complexation with  sodium  diethyldithiocarbamate  and  extraction into
methyl isobutylketone.  At least one  blank of each sample type was run
with  each group of analyses.   Average blank values  were used to
correct gross results.
    The  speaker concluded from the  data  collected in the  studies  that
both  types of filters demonstrate high efficiency  for the collection  of
particulate lead  and that only a low  percentage of organic lead
exists,  especially where lead concentrations are  somewhat elevated
or when the higher sampling  rate is used.   At the lower  sampling rate,
it  was found  that the  backgrounds on carbon and acid were too large
a part of the  total lead found to give dependable results.   The blank
values were reported as follows:

    Glass fiber  or membrane filter      0.9 yg Pb/filter
    Carbon                             2.0 \ig Pb/2  g sample size
    Acid scrubber  (3N HNOs)           0.2 yg Pb/ml

These blank values include the filter and  carbon or  acid plus the  chemicals
needed to bring  these samples to  the point  of analysis.  When  a sample
of 3N nitric acid was analyzed directly by  a flameless atomic absorption
technique, the total acid blank was 0.001  to 0.008 yg Pb/ml.  However,

-------
even at the lower sampling  rate where blanks values became significant,
average filter efficiencies  were high,  and organic lead was low.   Although
Mr. Ter Haar mentioned that the blanks were higher than he would have
liked,  he stressed the  importance of sufficient sample size  to make
the blanks a small part of the total  sample.
    In the cryogenic study, Mr. Ter Haar reported that lead which passed
through the filter averaged  only  2 percent of the total  lead collected.
It  was also mentioned that activated carbon quantitatively retained both
tetramethyl and tetraethyle&d, as  shown by the MSA  study.
    The  speaker closed with the statement that both glass fiber and
membrane filters are highly efficient in collecting particulate lead in
air and that the  small  amount of organic lead present is efficiently
collected  on activated carbon.  The studies of Drs.  Robinson and
Skogerboe indicate that measurements of lead as  reported by the National
Air Sampling Network  are low because of lead passing through the  filter;
according to Mr.  Ter Haar, this is  not so.

-------
Ralph Parod — Environmental Health Laboratories, Inc.

     Mr. Parod discussed filter efficiency for lead particulate.  The
 sampling train used to collect freeway samples consisted of a  0.45-vm
 millipore filter followed by two  nitric acid scrubbers  in  series.   The
 flow rate varied  from  4.6 to  10.4  liters/minute.   Mr.  Parod also reported
 results obtained  using a closed  system for the generation and  collection
 of lead particulate.  The particulate was generated  by burning an alco-
 holic solution of  organic lead (TEL) .   The collection  system consisted of
 a glass  fiber  or  millipore filter  (0.45 ym) ,  an activated  charcoal trap,
 and two nitric acid  scrubbers in  series.  The flow  rate  varied from 7 to
 9 liters/minute.
     The concentration of lead in each sample  was determined by  the
 colorimetric dithizone  procedure.
     The data acquired from sampling near a freeway showed filter
 efficiency for particulate lead to be on the order of 97  percent, whereas
 the  studies on the closed system, in which lead particulate was generated
 and collected, showed efficiencies for glass fiber and  millipore filters
 approaching 99 percent.  Blank values  reported were as follows:

       Millipore filter                     0.025 yg Pb/filter
       Glass fiber filter                   0.5 yg Pb/filter
       Activated charcoal                  0.5 yg Pb/g
       Acid scrubber (10% HNO3)          0.0006 yg Pb/ml

-------
E. S^. Jacobs  —  DuPont Company

      Dr. Jacobs described the  sampling train  used for  collection  of
atmospheric lead as consisting of a millipore filter followed by  either
an activated charcoal scrubber or one containing iodine  monochloride.
Lead was extracted from the filter and scrubbers and  analyzed by atomic
absorption spectroscopy. Results of field studies at five sampling
sites were presented.  Also described were studies to determine the
amount of non-filter able lead in vehicle exhaust in 1963 to 1970 auto-
mobiles and experiments designed to determine the mass balance of
lead burned in various  engines .
      The speaker concluded from his data that only 1 to 3 percent of
total lead in the  air and less than 0.1 percent of exhaust lead may pass
through  a filter.  The  particulate lead concentration in car exhaust was
shown to be 100  to 1,000 times greater than  that of the organic lead.   The
lead balance study on  cars  which ran for 50,000 or more miles accounted
for better that 95 percent of all  the  lead  used during  this  mileage accumu-
lation .
 10

-------
Glair  C_. Patterson — California Institute of Technology

      Dr. Patterson did not deliver a prepared  talk, but instead commented
on the material that had been presented.  He observed that the researchers
with low blanks  found lead that passed through the filter,  while those
with high blanks did  not.   He emphasized the importance of low blank
values for measurement methods  of the type discussed.
      As  an explanation for the high freeway levels of lead found by
some researchers, the speaker also commented on the possibility of large.
amounts  of  lead-containing particulate depositing on the r< ad and being
volatized  under appropriate meteorological conditions.
      Dr. Patterson also discussed a cooperative experiment with
Dr.  Robinson whereby he  would visit the Baton Rouge Laboratory and
collect samples for analysis as Dr. Robinson is monitoring.  Dr. Patterson
would return to his laboratory and assay those sa'mples that were
collected at  the same time that Dr. Robinson was monitoring a high
"molecular lead"  value by an isotope dilution mass spectrometric
technique.  This experiment would ascertain the accuracy of
Dr. Robinson's total lead measurement.
                                                                    LI

-------
Benjamin  Y^ H. Liu — University of Minnesota

      Dr. Liu  discussed  the  subjects of size distribution of particles
and filter efficiencies.  He presented a  slide containing a plot  of parti-
cle volume versus particle diameter for fresh auto exhaust that showed
a peak between 0.01 and 0.1  ym.  He mentioned  that the percentage of
particle volume associated with  submicron particles varies from 9 percent
in Fort Collins, Colorado, to 69 percent in  Los  Angeles, California.
      On  filter efficiency, Dr.  Liu reported that when  using a 10-ym  pore
size Mitex Teflon filter, the minimum efficiency for collection of
0.05-ym particles was  found  to  be 65 percent at 1  cm mercury pressure
drop.  For  a 5-ym pore  size of the same  filter  and using the same
particle diameter, the minimum  collection  efficiency was reported to
be 80 percent  at 1 cm mercury pressure drop.   For  both  pore sizes of
filters, as the  pressure drop was increased, the particle  size  for minimum
collection  efficiency shifted to smaller sizes.  In addition,  when using
8-ym  pore size Nucleopore filters, the efficiency for collection of 0.02
to 0.1-ym particles was found to be 0 percent at 1  cm mercury pressure
drop,  increasing  to 20 percent at 25 cm mercury pressure drop.
Further,  Dr. Liu reported that preliminary  measurements on 0.8-ym
millipore  filters show that the collection efficiency  is essentially 100 per-
cent.   He also mentioned that he would like to get some of Dr. Robinson's
Micropore carbon discs and examine them for collection efficiency.
 12

-------
                              DISCUSSION

      As mentioned  previously,  this seminar had a double purpose:

    1. To review current methods for sampling and analyzing atmospheric
       lead.
    2. To consider the latest research data by Drs. Robinson and Skogerboe
       suggesting that large quantities of lead pass through the filters being
       used to measure lead in air.
This lead is termed "organic (gaseous)" by Dr. Skogerboe and "molecular"
by Dr. Robinson.
      With regard to the second  objective, Dr.  Jacobs and Messrs. Parod,
Ter Haar,  and Robertson presented  data indicating that greater than 95
percent of the  total lead is collected on the primary filter and that the small
percentage of organic lead that exists is efficiently collected on the  second-
ary carbon  filter.
      In attempting  to  compare the  results presented,  one finds a number
of problem areas.  The type  of filter for  collecting samples varied (mil-
lipore,  glass fiber, membrane) as did the blank  value of the different
filters.   Various types of carbon backup  filters were used.  The  nitric
acid in  the  scrubbers  ranged from  doubly redistilled to reagent grade,
and the concentration also  varied from investigator to  investigator.
Flow rates and sampling times  varied from 100 ml/minute  for 5 minutes to
15 liters/minute for 24 hours.  Further, samples were analyzed colorimetrically
as well as by  four different techniques of atomic  absorption  spectroscopy.
According  to Dr. Robinson, humidity had  an effect on the amount  of
"molecular" lead observed, but no  other investigator recorded its  value.
Dr. Liu indicated that the  concentration of submicron-size particles can
vary from  9 to 69 percent  depending on the part  of the country in which
samples are  collected.   The statements by Drs. Robinson and  Liu  suggest
locational effects on results.
      Therefore, any attempt to  compare  these results for atmospheric
lead is  most difficult,  because the researchers used different filter

                                                                        13

-------
media, sampling rates,  sampling times,  reagent purities,  and analytical
methods.   In addition, sampling locations  were diifcrcji.it.

                           CONCLUSIONS
      The  conclusions  that can be  drawn  from  this seminar  are very
clear.  There is wide  variability in the sampling  and analytical
parameters for the analysis cf atmospheric lead.   More work must un-
done to determine the effects  related to  filter media,  sampling velocity,
sample handling,  and humidity.  In addition,  substantiation by  an in-
dependent  investigator and unequivocal  characterization of the structure(s)
of "molecular lead"  (Robinson) and the  nature  of  the "gaseous  lead1'
(Skogerboe)  are vitally needed.  Only through more research and  vital
confirmation  studies will we be  able to  determine  the true atmospheric
profile of lead.
14

-------
                                TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                          (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
 EPA-650/2—75-003
                                                       3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION*NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  SEMINAR  SUMMARY: Sampling  and Analysis
  of the Various  Forms of Atmospheric  Lead
                                                      5. REPORT DATE
                                                        January 1975
                                                      6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
     Carole R. Sawicki
                                                       8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS

  National  Environmental Research Center
  Chemistry and  Physics  Laboratory
  Research Triangle Park,  N.C.  27711
                                                       10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                                                      11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
  National Environmental  Research  Center
  Research  Triangle  Park, N.C.  27711
                                                       13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                          Final
                                                       14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
  The  sampling  and analysis of hazardous  substances in the atmosphere  are
  topics that currently  generate substantial  interest.   One such  hazardous  sub-
  stance,  lead,  was  the  subject of a day-long seminar wherein 10 prominent
  scientists  knowledgeable  in the areas of sampling and  analysis of the various
  forms of atmospheric lead gave  oral  presentations.  The  seminar provided
  an  opportunity to review the current  methods for sampling and analyzing  at-
  mospheric lead and to  consider  recent research data  by two  seminar par-
  ticipants which  suggest that certain forms  of atmospheric lead pass through
  filters presently being used for measurement.  The  importance  of  this obser-
  vation stems from the belief that if such lead  exists  it  is likely to be much
  more physiologically  active than  particulate lead.   This report summarizes
  those various  presentations.
17.
                             KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                DESCRIPTORS
                                          b.IDENTIFIERS,OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                                                   c. COSATl l-icld/Group
     Lead
     Sampling
     Analyzing
     Atmospheric
13. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

     Release  unlimited
                                          19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
                                                none
21. NO. OF PAGES
     18
                                          20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                                none
                                                                   22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                         15

-------