f
PB-239 392
WHERE THE BOILERS ARE
A SURVEY OF ELECTRIC UTILITY BOILERS WITH POTENTIAL
CAPACITY FOR BURNING SOLID WASTE AS FUEL
GORDIAN ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED
PREPARED FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
1974
DISTRIBUTED BY:
National Technical Information Service
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
-------
3I0LI06RAPHIC DATA
SHEET
1. Report No.
EPA/53Q/SH-88C
4. Title and Subtitle
Where the Boilers Are. A Survey of Electric Utility Boilers
with Potential Capacity for Burning Solid Waste as Fuel
5. Report Date
1974
6.
7. Author(s)
Barry G. Tunnah,
Adel Hakki, and Roger J. Leonard
8. Performing Organization Rept.
No.
,9. Performing Organization Name and Address
Gordian Associates Incorporated
299 Park Avenue
New York, New York 10017
10. Project/Task/Work Unit No.
11. Contract/Grant No.
68-01-1132
12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste Management Programs
Washington9 D.C. 20460
13. Type of Report & Period
Covered
Final
14.
15. Supplementary Note:
16. Abstracts
The use of prepared solid waste as a supplementary fuel is being investigated
by communities all over the country as a method for recovering energy from commercial
and residential solid wastes. This document presents survey results that are
intended to help local decision-makers in assessing the availability of electric
utility boilers with potential for using prepared solid waste as supplementary
fuel. For the major coal-burning States and the major urban centers, details
are given for investor-owned and municipally-owned plants on the following items:
(1) boiler characteristics; (2) energy requirements for electricity generation;
(3) potential energy available from combustion of solid waste derived from
specified areas around each plant; (4) typical transportation distances from
the centers of waste generation to the plants, and (5) the potential waste-burning
capacity per day of each boiler if solid waste replaced 10 percent of its fossil fuel
7. Key Words and Document Analysis. 17a. Descriptors
Heat recovery
Waste disposal
Steam electric power generation
Boilers
REPRODUCED
WHITE
b. Identifiers/Open-Ended Terms
Energy recovery from solid waste
Resource Recovery
Waste-based energy
Waste as supplementary fuel
c. COSATI Fie Id/Group
Availability Statement
Release to public
19. Security Class (This
Report)
UNCJLASSIEIEJQ—
20TSecurity Class (This
Page
UNCLASSIFIED
2lVNo7~6TPaf(?s
RM NTIS-3B (REV. 10-73) ENDORSED BY ANSI AND UNESCO.
THIS FORM MAY BE REPRODUCED
USCOMM-DC 6Z6S-P74
-------
This report as submitted by the grantee or contractor has not been
technically reviewed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Publication does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policies of EPA, nor does mention of commercial products
constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government.
An environmental protection publication (SW-88c) in the solid waste
management series.
-------
FOREWORD
Growing concern for the environment, combined with awareness that
supplies of material and energy are limited, has resulted in an expanding
effort to conserve resources and to develop new resources without damaging
the environment. One of the most practical approaches to sensible resource
management is the recovery and reuse of materials heretofore discarded as
waste.
Over the past several years, communities all over the country have be-
gun to investigate resource recovery as a waste management option. Among
the various methods being considered for recovering energy from the waste
stream is the use of prepared solid waste as a supplementary fuel in utility
power plant boilers. As described in the background section of this report,
this approach is being demonstrated by the City of St. Louis and the Union
Electric Company with support to the city from the U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency.
The purpose of this report, prepared for EPA by Gordian Associates,
Inc., New York City, is to provide the basic data that a State or local
decision-maker needs to begin considering the opportunities (potential
markets) for using solid waste as a fuel in electric utility power plant
boilers. With the survey data provided in this report, the decision-
maker can focus on specific boilers in discussions with utility officials.
The reader should be aware, however, that this data by itself does
not say whether a utility will or even can burn solid waste in its boilers.
There are important technical and economic factors—different for ea'ch
utility—that determine a utility's ability or willingness to use waste
ill
-------
as a fuel. These factors are outside the scope of this study but never-
theless must be considered. Some of them are listed in Appendix I.
In developing a resource recovery system, information about potentic
markets is essential in selecting and implementing a resource recovery t
nology. Although the electric utility is only one of several possible ma.
kets for waste-based energy, this study is intended to provide some of th
necessary information about the electric utility as a potential market
for solid waste as a fuel.
Arsen J. Darnay
Deputy Assistant Administrator
Office of Solid Waste Management Progra
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
iv
-------
CONTENTS
Page
SUMMARY 1
BACKGROUND 2
THE STUDY 6
General Scope 6
Boilers Not Included 7
How the Results Are Presented 8
How to Calculate Waste-Burning Capacities 12
DATA FOR 1971
Summary of Results ^
Alabama 18
California 26
Connecticut «• • 29
Delaware (Wilmington) 38
Florida t A2
Georgia 60
Illinois 68
Indiana 85
Kansas (Kansas City) 10°
Kentucky 102
Maine (Portland) m
-------
CONTENTS (cont.)
Page
Maryland 114
Massachusetts 123
Michigan 135
Minnesota (Minneapolis/St. Paul) 153
Missouri 159
Nebraska (Omaha) 176
New Hampshire (Manchester) 179
New Jersey 182
New York 191
North Carolina 211
Ohio 219
Pennsylvania 246
Rhode Island (Providence,
Pawtucket, Warwick) 271
Tennessee 274
Virginia 280
West Virginia 287
Wisconsin 293
DATA FOR 1975
Summary of Results 307
Probable New Plants, Excluding Nuclear, 1972-75 309
vi
-------
CONTENTS (cent.)
APPENDICES Page
I Aspects of Waste Combustion Outside of This Study 315
II Details of How the Work Was Done 319
III Development of the Nomograph 324
IV Glossary 325
REFERENCES 329
vii
-------
WHERE THE BOILERS ARE
SUMMARY
This document presents survey results that are intended to help local
decision-makers in assessing the availability of utility boilers with pott
for using prepared solid waste as a supplementary fuel.
Power plants originally designed to fire coal, even if they have
subsequently been modified to burn oil, normally have the bottom ash
handling and air pollution control equipment necessary for burning solid
waste. Consequently, this study covers not only the major coal-burning
States, but also the major urban centers, many of which may have oil-fired
boilers originally designed to fire coal.
Details are given for investor-owned and municipally-owned plants on
the following items, based on 1971 data and projections for 1975: (1)
boiler characteristics; (2) energy requirements for electricity generation;
(3) potential energy available from combustion of solid waste derived
from specified areas around each plant or group of plants; (4) typical
transportation distances from the centers of waste generation to the plants,
and (5) the potential waste-burning capacity per day of each boiler if it
replaced 10 percent of its fossil fuel with solid waste fuel. The study
does not investigate the potential economic, technical, administrative, or
legal problems which may be involved in solid waste combustion.
To verify or update any of the data in this report, the reader can
determine for himself the potential waste-burning capacity of nearby
boilers by using the nomograph (See "How To Use The Data") and boiler
data obtained from the utility.
I
-------
BACKGROUND
Recovering energy from solid waste is a practice that is being
increasingly recognized as both environmentally sound and economically
attractive.
Energy recovery from solid waste has been practiced in Europe for
several decades. There, solid waste is burned on grates in boilers
specifically designed to handle the waste as either supplementary or
primary fuel.
In the United States, however, there are no investor-owned utility
boilers designed specifically to burn solid waste. Most of these boilers
burn fossil fuels in suspension. Consequently, in order to burn solid
waste in existing boilers while avoiding costly boiler modifications
such as the installation of firing grates, the technique of preparing
solid waste for suspension firing was developed.
Use of solid waste as supplementary fuel in existing power plant
boilers was initially studied in 1968 by the Union Electric Company
and the City of St. Louis, with financial support from the Federal
solid waste management program. The results of the study were encouraging,
and in 1970 a demonstration project was initiated. The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency's Office of Solid Waste Management Programs and Office
of Air Programs Jointly awarded a grant to the City of St. Louis for
two-thirds of the cost of the project. The Union Electric Company provided
its technical expertise, two 125-megawatt tangentially fired boilers, and
nearly a million dollars for the demonstration.
-------
Operations began in April 1972 and continued intermittently until
May 1973. At that time an air classifier was installed in the system
in order to reduce pneumatic feeder jamming and pipeline erosion that
prevented continuous operation of the facility. Operations ceased
while the air classifier was being installed and resumed in November
1973 with initiation of a comprehensive testing program.
The process itself is relatively simple (Figure 1). Domestic solid
waste, collected from residential areas of the city of St. Louis, is
ground up in a large hammermill. The shredded waste is air-classified,
and the light combustible waste fraction is fired pneumatically into
existing boilers in the Union Electric Company system. Magnetic metals
are recovered from the heavier, mostly noncombustible, fraction and are
sold for recycling to the Granite City (Illinois) Steel Company. The
remaining glass, ceramics, and other nonmagnetic materials are landfilled.
All of this has been achieved by applying existing technology and using
equipment that is already commercially available.
The system was designed so that the solid waste initially would
replace 10 percent of the boiler's coal requirement. Experience has
shown that 15 to 20 percent fuel replacement rates can now be considered
realistic. It also appears that solid waste can be used economically in
almost any boiler that has bottom ash handling and air pollution control
facilities. This Includes tangentially-fired, front-fired, opposed-fired,
cyclone-fired, and stoker-fired boilers. It also includes boilers currently
burning gas or oil, although boiler manufacturers conservatively recommended
an initial fuel replacement ratio no greater than 10 percent with oil.
-------
PROCESSING PLANT FOR SOLID WASTE, ST. LOUIS PROJECT
AIR CLASSIFIER
Cyclone separator
STORAGE AND TRANSPORTATION
HAMMERMILL
Packer truck
RAW REFUSE DELIVERY
Ferrous moots hauled to steel mill
Nonmagnetic metals, glass, and waste
to further separation or to l.indfill
FERROUS METAL RECOVERY SYSTEM
Figure 1. In the system being demonstrated by Union Electric Company in St. Louis, fuel and ferrous metal are recovered from municipal
solid waste that has been shredded and air classified.
-------
Although technical problems have been encountered (especially in trans-
porting the material), the project has demonstrated successfully the genera-
tion of electricity from burning solid waste as a supplementary fuel in coal-
fired power plant boilers, with the simultaneous reduction in solid waste
disposal problems.
For more information on the St. Louis project, see Energy Recovery from
Waste by Robert A. Lowe (Environmental Protection Publication SW-36dii, U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1973, 24 p.).
For information about the first series of air pollution tests conducted
as part of the St. Louis project, see St. Louis/Union Electric Refuse Firing
Demonstration Air Pollution Test Report by Midwest Research Institute (to be
published by the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of
Commerce).
-------
THE STUDY
The objective of this study is to provide a data base for assessing
the potential for using solid waste from residential and commercial sources
as supplementary fuel in existing steam-electric power plant boilers that
are investor-owned or municipally-owned.
General Scope
The study presents design information about electric utility boilers
in selected States and relates the energy requirements of those boilers
to waste generation in the surrounding areas for the years 1971 and 1975.
It is generally assumed that a boiler must have both bottom ash
handling and air pollution control capabilities if it is to be modified
economically to burn solid waste. Accordingly, it was decided to limit
the study primarily to those plants designed to burn coal. In certain
areas, however, such as Florida and California, where there are large
population centers, boilers were included in the study even though they
were not designed to burn coal.
The States included in the study are the most heavily populated
ones (the Northeast, California, and Florida); they contain about 75
percent of the U.S. population. They include all of the major coal-
burning areas and account for over 90 percent of the coal and 80 percent
of the oil consumed for power generation.
-------
Boilers Not Included
As mentioned above, this study provides data on investor- and municipally-
owned steam-electric boilers. The study does not deal with boilers that
generate steam for industrial processes or for heating and cooling buildings
(space or district heating and cooling), including those on Federal facilities;
also excluded are industrial steam-electric boilers. It should be noted that
these other boilers do represent a potential market for solid waste fuel.
At the present time, there is little data available about the location
and potential waste-burning capacity of these boilers. The IKS. Environmental
Protection Agency is currently conducting two studies to provide these data.
First, the Solid and Hazardous Waste Research Laboratory, in Cincinnati, Ohio,
is studying the suitability of burning waste as fuel in industrial boilers.
Secondly, the Office of Solid Waste Management Programs is surveying Federal
facilities to evaluate the feasibility of requiring the Federal government
to use waste as fuel.
-------
How the Results Are Presented
Time Frame
The data presented are for two years:
1971, to approximate current conditions, and
1975, to represent a situation in the short-term future, at a time when a
number of new plants, particularly nuclear ones, are expected to be
in operation and the load factors on the older coal plants may be
reduced.
The Areas Covered
For each of the following States, boiler and plant data has been assembled,
together with the related statistics on waste generation and transportation
distances:
Alabama Minnesota (Minneapolis-St. Paul only)
California Missouri
Connecticut Nebraska (Omaha only)
Delaware (Wilmington only) New Hampshire (Manchester-Portsmouth only)
Florida New Jersey
Georgia New York
Illinois North Carolina
Indiana Ohio
Kansas (Kansas City only) Pennsylvania
Kentucky Rhode Island
Maine (Portland only) Tennessee
Maryland Virginia
Massachusetts West Virginia
Michigan Wisconsin
The Data Format for Each State
Data is presented as follows:
a. A map of the State, showing plants operating in 1971 and those expected
to be commissioned by 1975. The corresponding solid waste generation
areas are defined.
b. A tabulation by "waste generation areas" of the energy requirements
8
-------
of plants and the potential energy availability from combustion of
prepared solid waste. Two tabulations are included, one for all
fossil fuel plants and the other for "coal plants" only — those
either designed for coal or converted to burn coal. In each case,
the potential energy from solid waste is expressed as a percentage
of the area energy requirement for the power plants. Average
transportation distances from the centers of waste generation to
the plants are shown.
Tables of details of individual plants on a boiler-by-boiler basis
(where possible). The following items are listed (see also
Appendix II, Details of How the Work Was Done):
Waste generation area (SMSA, county, etc.)
Plant name and number according to the State map
Utility company operating the plant
Boiler capacities in megawatts
Plant load factor
Plant energy requirement in Btu per year
Type of firing for each boiler
Plant fuel distribution, by the percentage of Btu from coal, oil, or gas
Plant design fuels
Type of bottom ash handling facilities
Type and efficiency of air pollution control facilities
Year of initial operation of each boiler
Solid waste burning capacity of each boiler
Typical waste transportation distances
A typical table Is shown on page 10 with the location of key information
marked. Many definitions of terms us4$ in the tables are found in the
Glossary, Appendix IV.
9
-------
Solid Haste
Generation Area-
SMSA, county,
etc.
Type of Firing
System (see list
of abbreviations,
Fossil Fuels in
Current Use
type of Air Pollution
Control Device and
Efficiency (see
alossary, App. Ill)
Boiler Capacity for
Burning Solid Waste
Based on 10% Waste,
90% Fossil Fuel
(see page 10)
1 page s;
Utility Company
SNSA-COUNTY/PLANT
h Br Idgeport-S taraf ord-Xorwalk
^ t>. Bridgeport Harbor {
(United Illuminating
Bolltr 1 )
2 '
\
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATIO
Design Fuels
i
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQKT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
1012 BTU -
HW X yr COAL OIL GAS
SMSACont'd.
r
Co.)
81.5 RTRO/ - 100
CTCL
179.5 W*0/ - 100
S CTtt
/ 399.5 PCTA/ 100
RTAN
660.5 72 41.80 • - 100
des. p. ^ _
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Connecticut
\
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTI
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACIT
TYPE EFF. J . 'tons/da
WET E
WET E
DRY E
5-10 1957 220
5-10 1961 485
20 1968 1075
i ,
.TYPICAL
ON TRANS.
r DISTANCE
y Miles
5
Plant Name
and Identifi-
cation Number
(see state
map)
Individual
Boiler
Capacities
Boiler
Identification
Numbers
coal oil
Plant Energy
(Fuel) Required
System of Bottom
Ash Handling (see
Glossary,
Appendix III)
Plant Load
Factor
i
Initial Year of
Boiler Operation
Typical Transporta-
tion Distance from
Center of Solid Waste
Generation to Plant
Site
-------
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations appear in the plant data tables:
a. The type of firing is specified as follows:
PCFR, pulverized coal: front firing
PCOP, pulverized coal: opposed firing
PCTA, pulverized coal: tangential firing
CYCL, cyclone
SPRE, spreader stoker
OSTO, other stoker
FLUI, fluidized bed
RFRO, residual oil: front firing
ROPP, residual oil: opposed firing
RTAN, residual oil: tangential firing
GFRO, gas: front firing
GOPF, gas: opposed firing
GTAN, gas: tangential firing
b. The type of air pollution control equipment is specified as follows:
E, electrostatic precipitator
C, combination mechanical-electrostatic precipitator
GRAY, gravitational or baffled chamber
SCTA, single cyclone-conventional reverse flow, tangential inlet
SCAX, single cyclone-conventional reverse flow, axial inlet
MCTA, multiple cyclones-conventional reverse flow; tangential inlet
MCAX, multiple cyclones-conventional reverse flow; axial inlet
CYCL, straight-through-flow cyclones
IMPE, impeller collector
VENT, wet collector: venturi
BAGH, fabric collector: baghouse
These abbreviations are consistent with standard Federal Power Commission
(FPC) forms.
Efficiency of Air Pollution Control Equipment
The figures shown in the tables refer to average operating data unless
marked (t), for data obtained under special test conditions, or (d), for
design figures. "NR" indicates data was not reported in the FPC 67 forms
nor supplied by the utilities themselves.
11
-------
How to Calculate Waste-Burning Capacities
As an aid for rapid calculations concerning boiler capacities and their
potential for burning solid waste, a nomograph (Figure 2) was developed.
The nomograph shows the relationship among four variables: (1) the
capacity of the boiler, in megawatts (MW). (2) The load factor of the
boiler, as a percent of time. (3) The heat rate (or efficiency) of the
boiler, in terms of Btu per kilowatt hour (KWH). (4) The tons of solid
waste that can be burned in the boiler each working day, assuming that waste-
fuel replaces 10 percent of the fossil fuel input and assuming a 5-day work
week for waste collection and handling. For any problem, three of the
variables must be defined to calculate the fourth. When more than one of
the variables are unknown, typical values for some of these can be used
to make rough estimates of the remaining unknowns. For example, given
only the boiler capacity and load factor to determine the waste burning
capacity, one could use a typical plant heat rate of, say, 11,000 or
12,000 Btu/KWH.
An example calculation is given on the nomograph Itself:
Q. How much refuse could be burned each day of the. week in a 94 MW
boiler with a load factor of 52.5 percent and a heat rate of
12,000 Btu/KWH?
PC
52.5
STEP '
A. 221 tons/day
221
12
-------
SOL ID WASTE COMBUSTION AND GENERA TING PLAN T PARAME TEftS
600 —
100—
500 —
CO
0—J
Figure 2. The nomograph shows the relationship among four variables: (1) the
capacity of the boiler, (2) the load factor of the boiler, (3) the heat rate of
the boiler, (4) tons of solid waste that can be burned in the boiler each day.
For example, how much refuse could be burned each day of the week in a
94 MW boiler with a load factor of 52.5% and a heat rate of 12,000 Btu/KWH?
Answer: 221 tons/day.
700-
400 —
300 —
UJ
UJ
cc
UJ
a.
CO
Q
O
in
M
Ul <
to in
200—
100—
ui
CO
u.
UJ
£C
0—I
-------
The nomograph was in fact used to calculate the boiler capacities for
refuse combustion shown in the data tables in exactly the manner indicated
above.
The advantage of a nomograph is its complete flexibility to allow
quick calculations to be made for any boiler or plant combinations. In
addition, although the calculation would no doubt usually be done to determine
the amount of refuse a boiler could burn, given its capacity, load factor
and heat rate, the "reverse" calculation may be useful to a municipality.
For example, what is the size of generating plant that could be expected
to process all the refuse generated in the municipality, given the quantity
as 300 tons of refuse per day, a typical plant heat rate of say 11,000 Btu/lb,
and a typical load factor of say 50 percent? The answer is 146 MW.
PC
~50
»^>
4
300
STEP
An explanation of how the nomograph was developed is presented in
Appendix III.
-------
DATA FOR 1971
Note: Columns may not add exactly due to truncation of numbers.
15
-------
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
ALL FOSSIL FUEL PLANIS
ALABAMA
CALIFORNIA
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE (Wilmington)
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
KANSAS (Kansas City)
KENTUCKY
MAINE (Portland)
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA (Mpls./St.Paul)
MISSOURI
NEBRASKA (Omaha)
NEW HAMPSHIRE (Manchester)
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
OHIO
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND (Providence,
Pawtucket, Warwick)
TENNESSEE
VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
TOTALS:
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
7861 .5
19326.6
3036.3
827.5
12323.6
6507.0
12318.3
9269.7
2395.8
9652.2
213.6
5541.3
5005.7
9322.0
2048.8
9493.7
794.2
638.0
5714.3
14976.2
7464.0
21896.9
18661.3
145.9
7443.7
4174.3
5595.4
5428.6
205680.6
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
376.8
789.6
164.8
53.5.
530.8
334.0
665.7
477.6
91.3
481.5
14.5
369.4
269.4
527.9
106.8
437.9
39.2
36.3
289.6
710.0
457.8
1080.7
948.5
10.6
340.5
217.7
316.8
248.7
10297.6
AREA
POP.
Millions
1.743
15.570
2.434
0.512
5.727
2.166
8.940
3.412
1.283
1.342
0.197
5.290
5.920
6.436
1.856
4.338
0.552
0.371
4.501
16.424
1.606
9.332
11.002
0.781
2.010
1.766
0.516
3.269
118.012
GENERATION
1971
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
In6 tons
yr
1.14
10.20
1.59
0.33
3.74
1.40
5.83
2.20
0.84
0.86
0.12
3.47
3.88
4.19
1.21
2.84
0.36
0.24
2.96
10.77'
1.01
6.04
7.36
0.51
1.31
1.15
0.32.
2.12
77.25
1012 BTU
yr
10.29
91.61
14.39
3.03
33.41
12.63
52.51
19.90
7.60
7.82
1 .16
31.19
34.92
37.82
10.97
25.53
3.26
2.19
26.62
96.94
9.15
554.36
64.78
4.61
12.52
10.36
2.89
19.14
693.55
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b%)
2.7
11.6
8.7
5.6
6.3
3.8
7.9
4.2
8.3 (also included in
!•£ Mo. total)
8.0
8.4
12.9
7.2
10.3
5.8
8.3
6.0
9.2
13.6
2f\
.0
5.0
6.8
43.4
3.7
4.8
0.9 C
7.7 ^
6.7
-------
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
COAL-BURNING PLANTS ONLY*
ALABAMA
CALIFORNIA
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE (Wilmington)
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
KANSAS (Kansas City)
KENTUCKY
MAINE (Portland)
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA (Mpls./St. Paul)
MISSOURI
NEBRASKA (Oircaha)
NEW HAMPSHIRE (Manchester)
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
OHIO
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND (Providence,
Pawtucket, Warwick)
TENNESSEE
VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
TOTALS :
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
7861.5
--
3002.0
827.5
4073.7
6396.0
12318.3
9269.7
2262.8
9652.2
--
5541.3
3533.3
9145.5
2018.8
8986.5
774.2
638.0
5194.9
10134.5
7463.0
21677.6
18335.9
145.9
7443.7
4174.3
5595.4
5082.8
169288.1
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
ln!2 BTU
yr
376.8
--
164.5
53.5
139.7
329.2
665.7
477.6
89.3
481.5
—
369.4
188.2
520.6
106.1
421.1
38.9
36.3
263.8
503.9
457 o &
973.2
930.3
10.6
340.5
217.7
316.8:
237.9;
8622.7
AREA
POP.
Millions
1.743
—
2.434
0.512
5.727
2.166
8.940
3.412
1.283
1.342
—
5.290
5.920
6.436
1.856
4.338
0.552
0.371
4.501
16.424
1.606
9.332
11.002
0.781
2.010
1.766
0.516
3.269
102.246
1971
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
1n6 tons ml 2 BTU
yr
1.14
—
1.59
0.33
3.74
1.40
5.83
2.20
0.84
0.86
--
3.47
3.88
4.19
1.21
2.84
0.36
0.24
2.96
10.77
1.01
6.04
7.19
0.51
1.31
1.15
0.32
2.12
66.74
yr
10.29
__
14.39
3.03
33.41
12.63
52.51
19.90
7.59
7.82
—
31.19
34.92
37.82
10.97:
25.53
3.26
2.19
26.62
96.94
9.15.
54.36
64.78
4.61
12.52
10.36
2.89
19.14 .
601.27
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/bSB)
2.7
—
8.7
5.6
23.9-
3.8
7.9
4.2
8.5 (also included in
' •" Mn total ^
i MU . LU La i j
8.4
18.6^
7.3
10.3*
6.1
8.4
6.0 — .
10.1 - -^
19.2-
2.0
5.6
7.0
43.4 -
3.7
4.8
0.9
7.7
7.0
All plants capable of burning coal (design or converted).
-------
ALABAMA
LEGEND
® Places ol 100,000 or more inhabitants
• Places of 50,000 lo 100,000 inhabitants
O Places ol 25,000 to 50,000 inhabitants outsid* SMSA s
'•I Standatd Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSA's)
18
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Alabama, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants
(b) (a) POTENTIAL TYPICAL
RATED ENERGY AREA REFUSE ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS,;
CAPACITY RQMT. POP. GENERATION ,„ FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
AREA MW 1Q12 BTU millions 106 tons 1012 BTU (a/b %) miles
yr yr yr
Birmingham SMSA 1756.9 115.1 .745 .48 4.41 3.8
Gadsden SMSA 138.0 8.5 .096 .06 0.56 6.7
Huntsville SMSA East
(Madison County and
Jackson County) 1977.9 90.8 .082 .05 0.48 0.5
Huntsville SMSA West
(Colbert, Lauderdale and
Limestone Counties) 1396.6 64.0 .240 .15 1.42 2.2
Mobile SMSA
(incl. Washington Co.) 1983.6 65.0 .399 .26 2.36 3.6
Tuscaloosa SMSA
(incl Greene Co. and Hale Co) 568.5 30.6 .146 .09« 0.86 2.8
Covington County 40.0 2.5 .035 .02 0.18 7.4
ALABAMA STATE TOTALS 7861.5 376.8 1.743 1.14 10.29 2.7
28
<5
40
40
20
50
5
Includes all plants detailed in attached data sheets.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Alabama, 1971 - "
fe
AREA
Birmingham SMSA
Gadsden SMSA
Huntsville SMSA East
(Madison and
Jackson Counties;
Huntsville SMSA West
(Colbert, Lauderdale and
Limestone Counties)
Mobile SMSA (incl.
Washington County)
Tuscaloosa SMSA (incl.
Greene and Hale Counties)
Covington County
ALABAMA STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
1756.9
138.0
1977.9
1396.6
1983.6
568.5
40.0
7861.5
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
BTU
115.1
8.5
90.8
64.0:
65.0
30.6
2.5
376.8
Coal Plants" Only
AREA
POP.
millions
0.745
0.096
0.082
0.240
0.399
0.146
0.035
1.743
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
tons
106 yr IQl
0.48 4.
0.06 0.
0.05. 0.
0.15 1.
0.26 2.
0.09 0.
0.02 0.
1.14 10.
BTU
41
56
48
42
36
86
18
29
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b %)
3.8
6.7
0.5
2.2
3.6
2.8
7.4
2.7
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
28
<5
40
40
20
50
5
Includes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel). Includes all plants in
attached data sheets.
* Does not differentiate between types of firing — assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEW: 1971
STATE: Alabama
SKSA-COONTY/PUWr
Mobile SMSA inc. Washington Co.
1. Barry
Alabama Power Company
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
2. Chlckasaw
Alabama Power Company
Boiler 1
2
3
8. Tomblgbee
(Alabama Electric Cooperative)
AREA TOTAL
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
HW % yr
153
153
272
403.8
788.8
1770.6 59** 51.95
46
46
46
T3ff 51 B773T
75.0 61 4.34
1983.6 65.02
TYPE
OF
FIRING
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA/
GTAN
PCTA/
GTAN
PCTA/
GTAN
*
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
100
100
100
100
des.p.coal
^4 - 66
des.p.coal gas
100 -
des.p. coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. *
Dry
Dry
Wet
Wet
Wet
Dry
Dry
Dry
*
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
E
E
IKPE
IMPE
IMPE
*
80
80
80
85
95
85
85
85
*
1954
1954
1959
1969
1971
1941
1943
1951
1969
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day mncs
345 20
345
613
910
1780
120 <5
120
120
185 50
* No FPC-67 filed for boiler breakdowns and air pollution control equipment.
** Based on 1970 factor since boiler 5 started up 1n 1971.
-------
REFUSE COtPUSTIQN FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Alabama
SMSA-COUHTY/PUWT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT.
10'2 BTJJ
HW
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. X
tone/day ' miles
Birmingham SHSA
4. Gorgas
Alabama Power Company
Bo Her 4AB
5
6
7
8
9
60
69
125
125
187.5
190.4
PCFR 100
PCTA 100
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
65 477T3
PCTA
PCTA
100
100
Dry
Dry
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
TOO
des.p.coal
MCTA 84
MCTA 84
MCTA 85
MCTA/E 85/95
1929
1944
1951
1952
1956
1958
160
285
315
315
485
495
25
6. Gaston
Southern Electric Generating Co
Boiler 1
1
2
3
4
AREA TOTAL
250
250
250
250
T300
1756.9
78 68703"
115.16
Sadsden SHSA
3. Gadsden
Alabama Power Company
Boiler 1
69
69
138
PCOP
PCOP
PCOP
PCOP
100
100
100
100
loo
dcs.
-
p. coal
-
™
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
58
Of
PCTA/
GTAN
PCTA/
GTAN
Dry
Dry
72 -
des.p.coal
28
gas
E
C
E
E
88
83
87
41
85
75
1960
1960
1961
1962
665
665
665
665
30
1949
1949
180
180
AREA TOTAL
13B
8.54
-------
SMSA-COWTY/PLANT
Covlngton County
7. WcWiTHatns
Alabama Electric Cooperative
Boiler 1
3
.6
AREA TOTAL
Tuscaloosa SflSA; Greene County
5. Greene
Alabama Power Company
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
REFUSE COHBU5TIOH FOR POWER GEMERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
tWftCYTf FACTOR WJOT. W OlSIWaUTWH
FIRING BY BTU X
10' 2 BTU
MU J yr COAL OIL GAS
7.5 *
7.5
25.0
4"G70" 54 O3 TZ - 88
des.s.coal gas
40iO 2.53
299.2 PCOP 100 -
9KO •» PCOP 100
36O" 65 1O5 100 - -
des.p.coal
568.5 30>68
YEAR: 1571
STATE: Alabama
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CON1ROL Uffi OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. %
* * * 1954
1954
1954
Wet E 85 T965
Met E 85 1966
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRMS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day miles
20 5
20
65 Montgomery 60
Mobile 94
CoVuntbus, Ga, 110
690 50
620
* Ho FPC-67 filed for boiler breakdowns and air pollution control equipment.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Huntsvllle SMSA-West
Colbert and Lauderdale County
9. Colbert A & B
Tennessee Valley Authority
Colbert A
Boiler 1
^^ O
X- 2
3
4
Colbert B
Boiler 5
AREA TOTAL
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
MW X yr COAL OIL GAS
211.65 *
211.65 *
211.65 *
211.65 *
846.6 55 "41)738"
550 **
550 51 2577T
1396.6 64.09
100
100
100
100
100
des.p.coal
100
100
des.p.coal
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Alabama
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY-
TYPE EFF. X tons/day
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA/
E
MCTA/
E
MCTA/
E
MCTA/
E
E
NR/NR 1955 430
50/88 1955 430
50/97 1955 430
50/88 1955 430
50 1965 1010
TYPICAL
TRANSPORTA-
TION
DISTANCE
MILES
40
40
* P. coal circular firing
** P. coal forced draft circular horizontal firing
-------
REFUSE COmUSTIOM FOR POKER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE: Alabama
Ui
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
•Huntsville SMSA-East with
Jackson County
10. Widows Creek A & B
Tennessee Valley Authority
Widows Creek A
Boiler 1
2
C
3
4
5
6
Widows Creek B
Boiler 7
8
AREA TOTAL '
RATED
CAPACITY
140.6
140.6
149.9
140.6
140.6
140.6
852.9
575
550
1125.0
1977.9
LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
FACTOR RQOT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
% yr COAL OIL GAS
* 100
* 100
* 100 -
* 100 -
* 100
* 100 -
46 37^05 100
des. p. coal
PCTA 100 -
PCTA 100 -
57 SOT 100
des. p. coal
90.83
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. 8
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
E
E
60
60
60
60
60
60
95
50
INITIAL
VEAR OF
OPERATIC?!
1952
1952
1952
1953
1954
1954
1960
1964
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMRUSTI00 TRAMS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day miles
235 40
235
250
235
235
235
115 40
115
P=coal horizontal firing circular burners
-------
CALIFORNIA
\
SUNNTVAlf •
\ JANtA C1A»AW (J)
< JAN K>H
. ol lOO.noO ot mm» in
, nl sn.OOO lo 100 nno
t] Cenlr^l c'Mrs ol SMSA «. w>lh '«*f f than 'jO 000
O Plj(f^ ol ^b.OOO lo bO.OOO mliabitjntt ouHirte SMS»'i
IMC'ON IMC*
COSfA UI}A
AiMi (SMSA i|
-------
California Plants
All existing fossil fuel plants in California are currently burning
oil or gas as designed. All proposed plants will also burn oil or gas.
The following table is included to indicate the magnitude of the quantities
of refuse and associated energy that are available at present.
27
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
AREA
Anaheim- Santa Ana-Garden Grove
SMSA
Bakersfield SMSA
Los Angeles-Long Beach SMSA
Oxnard-Simi Valley- Ventura SMSA
Salinas-Monterey SMSA
San Bernardino-Riverside-
Ontario SMSA
San Diego SMSA
San Francisco-Oakland SMSA
San Luis Obispo County
Humboldt County
CALIFORNIA STATE TOTALS
NOTES
California, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants
(b) (a)
RATED ENERGY AREA REFUSE
CAPACITY RQMT. POP. GENERATION
MM 1012 BTU millions 106 tons 1Q12
870
165
8327
435
2174
1188
1576
3429
1056
102
19326
.4
.5
.6
.2
.7
.5
.8
.2
.3
.4
.6
43
0
339
26
80
64
65
126
39
2
789
yr
.8
.0
.5
.5
.7
.0
.9
.0
.9
.9
.6
1.
0.
7.
0.
0.
1.
1.
3.
0.
0.
15.
452
330
196
387
257
170
380
174
108
102
570
yr
0.95
0.21
4.72
0.25
0.16
0.76
'0.90
2.08
0.06
0.06
10.20
8
1
42
2
1
6
8
18
0
0
91
.59
.95
.55
.03
.52
.92
.16
.77
.57
.54
.61
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
BTU (a/b %)
yr
19.
9750.
12.
7.
1.
10.
12.
14.
i
i •
18.
11.
6
0
5
6
9
8
4
9
4
3
6
Typical Transportation Distances: All plants located within SMSA regions except
11. Morro Bay, San Luis Obispo County Santa Barbara 85 miles
9. Humboldt Bay, Humboldt County Sacramento, San Francisco 200 miles
Energy Requirement calculations based on data
Fuel Consumption and Unit Costs, 1971, and
derived from
2) Steam-El
: 1)
Steam-Electric Plant
ectric Plant
Air and Water
Capacity
Quality
, Net Generation,
Control Data,
Federal Power Commission, 1970.
-------
SPRINGFIELDCHICOPEI HOLYOKE
irn
W 000 i^ri3.ti
o>.n
-------
REFUSE COMBUSION FOR POWER GENERATION
AREA
Bn'dgeport-Norwal k -Stamford
SMSA
Hartford-New Britain SMSA
(incl. Middlesex Co.)
New Haven SMSA
New London-Groton-Norwich
SMSA
CONNECTICUT STATE TOTALS
Connecticut
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
1668.9
638.8
168.8
559.8
3036.3
, 1971 - All
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
97.0
37.4
6.8
23.5
164.8:
Fossil Fuel
AREA
POP.
millions
0.807
0.957
0.435
0.235
2.434
Plants
10 6
0.53
0.62'
0.28
0.15
1.591
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
tons 1012 BTU
yr yr
4.77
5.66
2.57
1.39
14.39
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b%)
4.9
15.1
37.7
5.9
8.7
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
6
<5
<5
<5
Includes all plants detailed on attached data sheets.
fe
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Connecticut, 1971 -
AREA
Bridgeport-Norwalk-
Stamford SMSA
Hartford-New Britain SMSA
(incl. Middlesex Co.)
New Haven SMSA
New London-Groton-Norwich
SMSA
CONNECTICUT STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
1648.9
638.8
168.8
545.5
3002.0
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
,0BTU
0 *-y r
96.8
37.4
6.8
23.4
164.5
"Coal Plants"
AREA
POP.
millions
0.807
0.957
0.435
0.235
2.434
Only
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
fitons ln12BTU
1 U" yyi 1 U yy»
0.53 4.7
0.62- 5.6
0.28 2.5
0.15 1.3'
1.59 14.3
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b %)
4.9
15.1
37.7
5.9
8.7
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
6
<5
<5
<5
Includes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel). Includes all plants in
attached data sheets except Nos. 12 and 13.
* Does not differentiate between types of firing -- assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
-------
REFUSE COrauSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Connecticut
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF
F I R I NG
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT N>12 BTU
m % yr
Bridgeport-Staraford-Norwalk SMSA
8. Steel Point
(United Illuminating Co.)
Boiler 1 x RFRO
2 ^
3
4
5
6
13
14
15
16
17
18
7
8
9
10
19
a 20
V1 21
^ 22
11
12
23
24
25
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO.
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
All boilers in range RFRO
'S 5 to 36 MW xiK)
' RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
PCFR/
PCFR/
PCFR/
RFRO
PCFR/
RFRO
PCFR/
RFRO
27 / PCFR/
/ RFRO
26 ' TOP
FIRED
155.5 46 11.55
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
des p-coal/oil
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100 T
100
100
- 100
100
100
100
100
100
100
~ Too" ~
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
None
"•
u
If
M
•
H
II
1*
H
..
-
M
N
»
M
'<
-•
N
»
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. %
None
'
-
-•
-
-
-
-
-
•
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
..
E 5-10 *
E 5-10
E 5-10
E 5-10
E 5-10
E 5-10
E 60
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1923
1923 \
1923
1923
1923
1923
1923
1923
1923
1923
1923
1923
1926
1926
1926
1926
1927
1927
1927
1927
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day Mi1es
5
485
/
1937 * Approximate efficiency
1<},7 on "oil operation",
(non-energised)
When energised,
9 efficiencies around
75Z reported.
1943
1943 ;
1950
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Connecticut
w
RATED
CAPACITY
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
MW
Bridgeport-Stamford-Norvalk SMSA Cont'd.
6. Bridgeport Harbor
(United Illuminating Co.)
Boiler 1 81.5
2 179.5
3 399.5
660.5
12. Derby
(United Illuminating Co.) - 20
11. Stamford
(Hartford Electric -Co.)
Boiler 9 *\
|
10 1
All boilers
11 )> under 25 MW
|
12 I
1
13 Jl
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
% yr
RFRO/
CYCL
RFRO/
CYCL
PCTA/
RTAN
72 41.80
.
8 0.168 *
PCFR/
RFRO
PCFR/
RFRO
TOP
FIRED
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GKRO
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
100
100
des. p.
coal oil
100
des. oil
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY"
TYPE EFF. % tons/day
WET E 5-10 1957 220
WET E 5-10 1961 485
DRY E 20 1968 - 1075
a * * 5
DRY E 90 1927
DRY E 90 1927
DRY C 95 1941
NR None - 1948
NR None - 1948
.TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
5
15
10
52.5
31
2.59
FPC-67 filed.
3 95 2
des.p. coal oil gas
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Connecticut
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
MM t vr~ COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL REFUSE TY!!!!£L
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day Miles
Bridgeport-Stamford-Korvalk SMSA Cont'd.
3. Horwalfc Harbor
(Conn. Light and Power)
Boiler 1
2
1 . Devon
(Conn. Light and Power)
Boiler 3
4a
4b
5a
5b
6
7
g
9
AREA TOTAL
163.2 PCTA
163.2 PCTA
326.4 58 16.82 93 7
des . p . coal
* RFRO
PCFR/
RFRO
PCFR/
RFRO
RFRO/
PCFR
RFRO/
PCFR
RFRO
103.5 PCTA
103.5 pCTA
PCTA _ __
454 52 24.07 ~4*"~ 54
des. p. coal oil
1668.9 96"83
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
C
C
E
C
C
C
C
E
E
E
E
98
98.5
96
94
94
93
93
95
98
98
98
1960 355 10
1963 355
1951 5
1942
1942
1947
1947
1947
1956 235
1958 "a
1958
* All boilers except 7, 8 under 70 MW
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Connecticut
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
MM % W
TVPE
OF
FIRING
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL
GA
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TYPICAL
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" TRANS.
DISTANCE
_ TYPE EFF. % tons/day Miles
Hartford-New Britain SMSA & Middlesex Co.
5.
4.
AREA
South Meadow
Hartford Electric Light Co.
Boiler 5
6
7
8
9
10
Middletown
Hartford Electric Light Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
TOTAL
40
40
45
51.8 .
20
20
216.8 45
69
113.6
239.4
422~ 69
638.8
T2720"
25729
37.49
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
-
-
-
100
100
100
Top Fired
RFRO
RFRO
PCFR
PCFR
*
-
-
-
-
des
12
des
100
100
100
100
.p. coal oil
88
.p. coal/oil
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Wet
Wet
Wet
None
SCAX 35
SCAX 35
SCAX
None
None
35
C 67
C 67
E 67
1929
1938
1942
1950
1960
1960
1954
1958
1964
95
95
105
120
45
45
175
285
610
*opposed cyclones, not pulverized
(A
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE: Connecticut
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
«w
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASK
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANSPORT
DISTANCE
MILES
New London-Groton-Norwich SMSA
7. Hoatvlllc* *
(Conn. Light and Power Co.)
Boiler I
2
4
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:W71
STATE: Connecticut
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
New Raven SMSA
7. English
(United Illuminating Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
fjj c
— 3
-3 6
7
9
11
8
10
12
13
14
10. Tierce
(Wellingford Dept. Public
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT.
101* BTU
HW X vr~
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
34.5
36.75
146.3 30. 6.54
Ctil.) 22.5 10 0.28
TYPE
OF
FIRING
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
TOP
FIRED
TOP
FIRED
*
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
~ Too" -~
dee .p. coal oil
ipo - -
dies s. coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. X
• none none
. n •• —
r
•• -
., _
*« —
•
H
,.
1.
f« ••
..
DRY E 47
DRY E 47
* * *
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1929
1929
1929
1929
1929
1929
1937
1939
1941
1930
1930
1930
1948
1953
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
long/day Miles
tr
10 <5
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10 :
10'
10
65
70
10 <5
AREA TOTAL
168.8
6.82
No FPC-67 filed.
-------
DELAWARE
LEGEND
• Places of 50,000 to 100.000 inhabitants
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Delaware, 1971 -All Fossil Fuel PI ants" .Wilmington
AREA
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
(b)
ENERGY
mi
U
BTU
AREA
POP.
millions
(a)
REFUSE
£ GENERATION
10 tons TO12
POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS. .
FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
(a/b X) Miles
Wilmington SMSA
827.5
53.5
0.512
0.33
3.03
5.6
<5
Includes all plants detailed in attached data sheets.
Wilmington SMSA
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
AREA
Delaware, 1971 -
(b)
RATED ENERGY
CAPACITY RQMT.
m 1012M
"Coal Plants"
AREA
POP.
millions
Only .Wilmington SMSA
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
.tons ,rtl9BTU
10o-yp- 1012—
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b %)
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
827.5
53.5
0.512
33
3.03
5.6
<5
Includes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel). Includes all plants in
attached data sheets.
* Does np_t differentiate between types of firing -- assumes all types
of refust.
-------
REFUSE COmuSTIOH FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Delaware
SHSA-COUKTY/PLANT
Wilmington SMSA
98. Edgemoor
Delaware Power & Light
Boiler 1 *
2
3
4
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING B? BTO
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POKER GENERATION
1971
STATE: Delaware
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT 1012 BTU "RING BY BTU Z
i •••
— — — HW X yr COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTIOli
HANDLING
Wilmington SMSA
TYPE
OPERATION "CAPACITY"
EFF. X
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
17 (NO). Oeepwater
Atlantic
Boiler
City Electric Company
1
8
7
9
3
4
6
CYCL
All boilers In J*™
range 23 to gJJ
82 MW top!
fired
RFRO
PCFR
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
15O 56 T8TT7 0 83 17
des.
p. coal oil gas
Wet
Dry
Dry
Dry
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
E
MCAX
MCAX
MCTA
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
90.7(t)
64.5(t)
84.1 (t)
80.8(t)
83.4(d)
83.4tt)
83.4(d)
83.4(d)
1958
1954
1942
1952
1930
193C
1930
1930
770
<5
AREA TOTAL
827.5
53.52
-------
ACKSONVILLE
n
fUHTS
&y
IEGEND
_ mmmm
©
t f.tcna' VSXC !o 100 CCO .'
O "»cri oi ?} COC to SJ OW) .™
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
AREA
Daytona Beach SMSA
Fort LauderdaTe SMSA
Fort Myers SMSA
Gainesville SMSA
(1wcl. Putnam Co.)
Jacksonville SMSA
(incl . Nassau Co.)
Mel bourne-Ti tusvi 1 1 e-Cocoa
SMSA
Miami SMSA
Orlando SMSA
Pensacola SMSA
Tallahassee SMSA
Tampa -St. Peters burg SMSA
West Palm Beach SMSA
Bay County
Citrus County-Levy County
Collier County
Highlands County
Indian River Co. -St. Lucie
Co. -Mart in Co.
Jackson County
Suwannee County
Key West
FLORIDA STATE TOTALS
Florida, 1971 -
(b)
RATED ENERGY
CAPACITY RQMT.
MW 1012 BTU
201.6
312.5
558.3
208.5
903.7
1062.5
1196.9
252.3
651.3
193.0
2851.8
729.6
340.0
1018.1
1254.6
61.0
71.6
98.0
147.0
68.8
12323.65
yr
12.5
15.6
22.8
11.6
41.5
53.8
57.0
12.0
34.5
11.7
61.9
36.5
17.8
43.2
73.8
2.7
2.6
5.3
9.4
3.9
530.8
All Fossil Fuel Plants
(a)
AREA REFUSE
POP. GENERATION
millions 106 tons lO1^ BTU
0.176
0.634
0.108
0.145
0.564
0.241
1.302
0.437
0.246
0.106
1.040
0.355
0.077
0.033
0.038
0.030
0.116
0.035
0.016
0.028
5.727
yr
0.11
0.41
0.07
0.09
0.37
0.15
0,85
0.28
0.16;
0.07
0.68
0.23
0.04
0.02.
0.02
0.01
C.06
0.02
0.00
0.01
3.74
yr
1.04
3.75
0.64
0.80
3.33
1.43
7.70
2.58
1.45
0.63
6.15
2.10
0.41
0.19
0.02
0.16
0.62
0.19
0.09
0.17
33.41
POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
("M> Nile.
8.3
23.9
2.8
6.9
8.0
2.7
13.5
21.5
4.2
5.0
9.9
5.7
5.3
0.5
_
5.9
23.8
3.5
1.0
4.3
fr.3
5
<5
10
5
7
24
15
< 5
< 5
10
5
< 5
5
30
10
7
10
<5
Includes all plants detailed on attached data sheets.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED
CAPACITY
AREA MH
Daytona Beach SHSA
Fort Uuderdale SMSA -
Fort Myers SMSA
Gainesville SMSA
(incl. Putnam Co.)
Jacksonville SMSA
(incl. Nassau Co.)
Mel bourne-Ti tiis vi 1 1 e-
Cocoa SMSA
Miami SMSA
Orlando SMSA
Pensacola SMSA 651.3
Tallahassee SMSA
Tampa-St. Petersburg
SMSA 1948.5
West Palm Beach SMSA -
Bay County 340.0
Citrus County-Levy
Xounty 964.3
Collier County
Highlands County
Indian River Co.-
l .. Lucie Co. -Martin
Co. 71.6
Jackson County 98.0
Suwannee County
Key West
FLORIDA STATE TOTALS 4073.7
Florida
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
_
-
'-
-
-
-
-
-
34.5
-
38.5
-
17.8
40.9
-
-
2.6
5.3
-
-
139.7
, 1971 - "Coal
AREA
POP.
millions
0.176
0.634
0.108
0.145
0.564
0.241
1.302
0.437
0.246
0.106
1.040
0.355
0.077
0.020
0.038
0.030
0.116
0.035
0.016
0.028
5.727
Plants"
Only
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
10^ tons
yr
o.n
0.41
0.07
0.09
.37
.15
.85
.28
.16
.07
.68
.23
.04.
.01
.02
.01
.06
.02
.00
.OL
3.74
1012 BTU
yr
1.04
3.75
0.64
.86
3.33
1.43
7.70
2.58
1.45
0.63
6.15
2.10
0.41
0.11
0.02
0.16
0.62
0.19
0.09
0.17
33.4V
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/bfc)
_
-
-
-
-
_
_
-
4.2
-
16.0
-
2.3
0.3
-
-
23.8
3.5
-
-
23.9
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
—
-
-
-
-
-
_
_
5
-
10
-
5
5
-
-
7
10
-
-
Includes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel).
19, 20, 21 and 32.
Includes plants 5, 16, 17, 18,
* Does not differentiate between types of firing—assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR PQtgR SENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Florida
SNSA-COUNTY/PUWr
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT.
1012 BTU
HH X yf~
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE PFF. *
Tampa-St. Petersburg SMSA
2.
3.
20.
Bartow
Florida Power Corporation
Boiler 1
2
3
Hlgglns
Florida Power Corporation
Boiler 1
2
3
Gannon
Tampa Electric
Bo-Her \
Z
3
4
5
6
127.5
127.5
239.4
79TT 7 T5I
46
46
46
T3a~" 59 BTBT
130
130
179.5
187.5
Z39.4
414
W55 *3 O7
RFRO
RTAN
RTAN
GFRO
SFRO
GTAN
CYCL
CYCL
CYCL
era
PCOP
PCOP
89 11
des, oil gas
72 28
des. oil gas
100
100
100
100
TOO
100
100
des. p. coal
None
tt
H
None
M
N
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
none
» *
a •*
none
M •
H -»
E 86
E 91
E 85
E 80
E 98
E 86
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1958
1961
1963
1951
1953
1954
1957
1S58
1960
1964
1965
1967
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
30
30
60
120
120
120
220
220
305
315
405
700
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
10
10
10
-------
SNSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Tampa- St. Petersburg SMS* cent' d
44. Lake Parker (Larsen Memorial,
Polk Co.) .
Plant 1 retired 1971.
Plant 2
Boiler 9
10
11
12
Plant 3
Boiler 1
Plant Totals
38. Bayboro
Florida Power Corp.
Boiler 4
5
6
REFUSE COMBUSTION
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR ROJff.
1012 BTU
MU X yr
20
25
25
50
120 49 6T2l
100
Too 25 T35
219.6 8.63
12.5
10
28-8 . „
TO 47 J3£
FOR POWER GENERATION
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
RFRO/
GFRQ
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
51 49
des.oll/gas
ROPP/
GOPP
86 14
des.oll/gas
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
100
des.oll
YEAR: 1971
STATE: FLORIDA
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. % tons/day «iics
<^
t>
None Hone - 1950 *»0
» " - 1956 55
ii " - 1959 55
•
ir V - 1966 no
< S
^* */
None None - 1970 no
15
None None - 1941 30
MOM None - 1941 »
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
SMSA-COUNTY/PLAKT
Tampa-St. Petersburg SKA Cont'd.
21. Hookers Point
Tampa Electric )
Boiler 1 * )
2 .
3 <
4 '
5
6
34. Big Bend
Tampa Electric
Boiler 1
AREA TOTAL
RATED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
MW %
43.4
64.1
46.5
78.6
232.6 54
445.5 37
2851.8
ENERGY TYPE
RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
yr
RFRO
RFRO
tv IM*
RFRO
RFRO
Rrni/
RFRO
111 n\f
RTAN'
TO?
15.33 PCOP
61.96
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
' 1UO
ICO
100
100
100
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: FLORIDA
RATED
CAPACITY
LOAD
FACTOR
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
ENERGY
RQMT.
1C12 BTU
yr
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU 1
COAL til GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRAKS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. X tons/dav
Hlami 5HSA
15. Turkey Point
Florida Power & Light
Boiler 1
2
8. Cutler
Florida Power & Light
Boiler 3
4
5
6
oo
402.1
402.5
50O
46
69
75
156.25
346.25
65
28
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RTAN
RTAN
RTAN
None
None
MCAX 84
MCAX 84
des.oll
61
39
gas
None
None
None
None
MCAX 83
MCAX 88
MCAX 88
MCAX 88
1967
1968
1949
1952
1954
1955
945
945
55
85
90
190
25
15
des.olt
TT
gas
37. Miami
Florida Power £ Light
Boiler 11 1
12. )
46
RFRO
RFRO
46
None
None
MCAX
MCAX
88(d)
1943
1948
105
des.oil/gas
AREA TOTAL
1196.9
57.08
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR TOWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Florida
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Orlando SMSA
14. Sanford
Florida Power & Light
Boiler 3
45. Lake Highland
Orlando Utilities Comm.
Boiler 1 1
2 /
3
4
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL R
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF C
FIRING BY BTU % HANDLING OPERATION "
1012 BTU
m % yr~ COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. * t
156.3 61 8.74 RFRO - 84 16 None None -
des.oll gas
28 RFRO/
GFRO None None
RFRO/
GFRO None None -
34 RFRO/
GFRO None None
34 RFRO/
GFRO None None -
96 5S8 i-2-? - 9 91
* des.oil/gas
1959
.1949
1949
1954
1956
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
tpjas/day .Miles
370
15
50
50
AREA TOTAL
252.3
12.01
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Florida
RATED
CAPACITY
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
HI
Collier Count v
12.
Pt. Everglades
Florida Power ft Light
Boiler 1
Z
3
4
AREA TOTAL
225.2
225.2
402.1
402.1
1254.6
1254.6
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQHT. OF
FIRING
10'* BTU
X W
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
67 73759"
73.89
CURRENT
FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU
COAL OIL
62
des. oil
x
GAS
38
gas
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
None
None
None
None
AIR
POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL YEAR OF
TYPE
NCAX
NCAX
MCAX
NCAX
OPERATION
EFF. 1
85 <
85 c
B8 <
88 (
1 1960
1 1961
1 1964
i 1965
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/ day
5*5
565
1005
1005
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
30
Miami 70
Key West
36.
Key Vest
Key Itest Utility Board
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
AREA TOTAL
<5
100
100
100
* No FPC 67 filed
** State average used
68.8
S4" "379
-LS.
des.
100
oil
1963
1966
165
-------
SHSA-COUNTY/PLAirr
He! boume-Tltusvl lie-Cocoa SMSA
n 7. Cape Kennedy
j. Florida Power & Light
Boiler 1
z
33. Indian River
Orlando Utility Commission
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL -
Highlands County
1. Avon Park
Florida Power Corp.
Boiler 1AB
2
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
402
402
HOT
78.5
ISO
2S5HT
1062.5
15
46
CT
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
Ti yr
RFRO
RFRO
74 3T7T7
RTAN/
GTAN
RTAN/
GTAN
54 TI7S5
53.02
RFRO
•41 ZT7T
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
62 38
des. oil gas
36 64
des. oil gas
36 64
des. oil gas
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Florida
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY"
TYPE EFF. > tons/day
None MCAX 84 1965 1080
MCAX 84 1969 1080
None None -» 1950 160
» « 1964 375
None No<« - 1928 25
, t, - 1952 «5
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
AREA TOTAL
61.0
2.71
10
Tanpa 63
Orlando 60
-------
REFUSE COHBUSTIOK FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 197!
STATE: FLORIDA
SHSA-COUHTY/PLANT
Gainesville SHSA
11. Palatka
40.
Florida Power & Light
Boiler 1
2
Gainesville
City of Gainesville
AREA TOTAL
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU «
1012 BTU
HH % vr COAL OIL GAS
34.5
75-
T09T5 60 O3
99 49 4.80
208.5 11.63
RFRO
RTAK
88 12
des. oil gas
* - 5 95
des. oil
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Florida
SMSA-COUNTY/PLAMT
Jacksonville SMSA , Nassau County
24. Kennedy
Jacksonville Electric Authority
Boiler 8
id Q
U
V 14}
25. Northslde
Jacksonville Electric Authority
Boiler 1
26. Southslde
Jacksonville Electric Authority
Boiler 1
2
b
A
•T
e
«l
AREA TOTAL
RA1ED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
MM X
50
50
149.6
259T6" 53
297.5 47
37.5
37.5
75
156.6
3"5676~ 49
903.7
ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL
FIRING BYBTUX HANDLING
1012 BTU
yr COAL OIL 6AS TYPE EFF. *
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
13 03
des.
12.01 ROPP
des.
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
TOT
des.
41.51
100 - None None
100 - « *
100 - - "
100
oil
100 - "one No"« -
oil
100 - None None
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 - ••
100
oil
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1955
19S5
1961
1966
1950
1951
1955
1958
1964
REFUSE TYPICAL
, COMBUSTION TRANS.
i "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tgns/day H11es
110
110
330
505
70
70
95
145
305
<5
<5
<5
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Florida
SKSA-COOfrnf/PLAHT
Fort Kyers SMSA
9. Fort Myers
Florida Power & Light
Boiler 1
AREA TOTAL
Tallahassee SMSA
23. Purdora
City of Tallahassee
Botler 1
2
3
•w
4
5
g
U
7
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT.
1012 BTU
MW I W
156.3
402
55873 48 2OT
558.3 22.81
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
22
22
44
TI8~ 51 OS"
TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
FIRING BY BTU 1 HANDLING OPERATION
COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. *
RFRO - 100 - None
RFRO 100
100
des. oil
RFRO None
RFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
ill r\w .
RFRO/
RTAN/
GTAN
RFRO/
GFRO
ur nv
RFRO/ .1
15 85
des. oil gas
Nor« - 1958
MCAX 84 («0 1969
None 1952
1952
- 1952
1954
)958
. . .
• W6'
1966
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUST ION TRANS
"CAPACITY" D1STANCE
tcma/day Biles
270 <5
700
20 <5
20
20
20
65
65
130
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Florida
5MSA-COUNTY/PLANT
28. Hopkins
City of Tallahassee
ARFA TOTAL
Suwannee County
6. Suwannee
Florida Power Corp.
Boiler 1
2
3
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
75
193.0
34.5
37.5
75
T4T~
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQHT. OF
FIRING
10'z BTU
% yr
54 3.36 RFRO/
GFRO
11.72
GTAH/
RTAN
GFRO/
RFRO
GFRO
65 9747
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU 1
COAL OIL GAS
100
des. oil gas
61 39
des. oil gas
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. J
None None. - 1971
None None 1953
1954
II M
1956
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
140
95
100
205
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
<5
10
Jacksonville 85
AREA TOTAL -
147
9.47
-------
Ul
YEAR: 1971
RATED
CAPACITY
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
MU
Citrus County-Levy County
5.
39.
Crystal River
Florida Power Corp.
Boiler 1
2
Inglis
Florida Power Corp
Boiler 1 \
3f
, <
5 }
6
440.5
523.8
§6473
12.5
12.5
28.8
-5378
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQHT. OF
FIRING
IfllZ BTU
X W
RTAN
50 41JHT
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
36 TTST
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
39 61
des.p.coal
31 69
des.o1l/gas
STATE: FLORIDA
BOTTOM
ASK
HANDLING
None
Dry
None
None
None
None
None
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
None -
E 95
None
None
None
None
None -
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1966
1969
1926
1926
1926
1926
1947
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day Miles
600 5
«SO
\ 20
;
|20
50
AREA TOTAL
1018.1
43.23
Gainesville 50
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOB POHER GENERATION
If EAR: 1971
STATE: Florida
SHSA-COWTY/PLANT
Indian River. St. Lucie and
Martin Counties
16. King
RATED
CAPAriTY
CAPACITY
LOAD
PACTftD
FACTOR
ENERGY
Dnur
RQMT.
TYPE
nc
OF
CURRENT FUEL
nTCTortiirrrnu
DISTRIBUTION
BOTTOM
o\»liun
ASH
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION
OPERATION "CAPACITY"
COAI nn
EFF. %
_,. tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
Boiler 1
2
3
4
35
1
7
AREA TOTAL
West Palm Beach SMSA
13. Riviera
Florida Power & Light
Plant 1AB
2
3
4
AREA TOTAL
0.5
1.5
2.6
5.1
7.7
16.9
37.3
71.6 32
71.6
43.8
75
310.4
310.4
"72976 56
729.6
reT
2.61
3B75J
36.53
1924
1937
1937
1958
des.
34
oil
5
10
25
55
66
gas
West Palo Beach 45
RFRO
RTAN
RFRO
RFRO
None KCAX 78.5(d) 1946
HCAX 88(dj 1953
» HCAX 88(d] 1962
MCAX 88(d) 1963
90
160
660
660
des. oil
gas
* No FPC-67 filed.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
1971
STATE: Florida
SNSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Fort Lauderdale SMSA
10. Lauderdale
Florida Power & Light
Boiler 4
5
AREA TOTAL
Pensacola SMSA
17. Crist
Gulf Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
tf 5
Cfc- £
RATED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
MM %
156.25
156.25
312.50 54
312.50
28.2
28.2
37.5
93.8
93.8
369.8
55O 55
ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
1fll2 BTU
vr COAL OIL GAS
RFRO
RFRO
TBTW 36 64
des. oil gas
15.69
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
PCTA/
GTAN
PCTA/
GTAN
GFRO/
PCFR
3O9 37 2 61
des.
s. coal oil gas
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. <
None f*Jont — 1957
" " 1958
None None ~ 1944
" . 1949
-• - 1952
Dry E 99.1 1959
Dry E 99.1 1961
Dry E 99.4 1970
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
330
330
60
ec
85
210
210
840
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
<5
<5
AREA TOTAL
651.3
34.59
-------
SNSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Jackson County
19. Scholz (River Junction)
Gulf Power Co.
Boiler 1
AREA TOTAL
Bay County
18. Lansing Smith
Gulf Power Co.
Boiler I
2
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
MM Z yr
49 PCFR
49 PCFR
3ff 50 O7
98.0 5.37
149.6 PCTA
190.4 PCTA
335^ 59 TT85
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
TOO
des.coal
100
100
100
des.p.coal
YEAR: 107
l
STATE: Florida
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. I
HCAX 65
HCAX 65
t 96.8
t 98.7
INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS,
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tone/day M11es
1953 110 10
1953 110
Tallahasaee 40
1965 330 <5
1967 425
AREA TOTAL
340.0
17.80
Tallahassee 80
(A
-------
GEORGIA
CHATTANOOGA
0 Places ol 100.000 or moK inhabitants
• Plares ol 50.000 to 100,000 inhabitants
O Places ol 25,000 to 50.000 inhabitant! outsid« SMSA's
•—i Standard Mtlropohtan
^J Statistical Areas (SMSA's)
AUGUSTA
-------
REFUSE CQNBUSTJON FOR POWER GENERATION
Georgia, 1971 - All
AREA
Albany SMSA
Atlanta SMSA
Macon SMSA
Savannah SMSA
(incl . Effingham Co.)
Putnam County
Bartow County
Carroll County
Floyd County
Glynn County
Lee County
GEORGIA STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
218.3
856.4
181.3
318.0
1746.2
1400.0
680.0
953.0
143.8
10.0
6507.0
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
12.0
54.5
13.5
19.8
83.0
61.3
40.6
39.8
8.8
0.4
334.0
Fossil Fuel
AREA
POP.
millions
0.090
1.429
0.210
0.204
0.009
0.033
0.047
0.076
0.051
0.007
2.166
Plants
106
0.05
0.93
0.13
0.34
0.00
0.02
0.02^
0.04
0.03
0.00
1.40
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION „
tons 101* BTU
yr yr
0.53
8.45
1.24
1.21
0.05
0.17
0.25.
0.40
0.27
0.03
12.63
POTENTIAL :
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b %)
4.4
15.5
9.2
6.1
0.1
0.3
6.2
1.0
3.1
9.3
3.8
DISTANCE!
Miles
<5
<5
<5
9
5
<5
<5
<5
15
Includes all plants detailed on attached data sheets.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Georgia, 1971 - "Coal Plants" Only
AREA
Albany SMSA
Atlanta SMSA
Macon SMSA
Savannah SMSA (incl.
Effingham County)
Putnam County
Bartow County
Carroll County
Floyd County
Glynn County
Lee County
GEORGIA STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
218.3
856.4
181.3
207.0
1746.2
1400.0
680.0
953.0
143.8
10.0
6396.0
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
ml2BTU
10'Zyr
12.0
54.5
13.5
15.1
83.0
61.3
40.6
39.8
8.8
0.4
329.2
AREA
POP.
millions
0.090
1.429
0.210
0.204
0.009
0.033
0.047
0.076
0.051
0.007
2.166
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
-tons. ,^i9BTU
10° yr
0.05
0.93
0.13
0.13
0.00
0.02
0.02
0.04
0.03
0.00
1.40
IU yr
0.53
8.45
1.24
1.21
0.05
0.17
0.25
0.40
0.27
0.03
12.63
POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
(a/b %)
Miles
4.4
15.5
9.2
8.0
0.1
0.3
6.2
1.0
3.1
9.3
3.8
<5
<5
<5
10
5
<5
<5
<5
15
Includes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel). Includes all plants in
attached data sheets except No. 15 (Savannah SMSA).
* Does not differentiate between types of firing — assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: V971
STATE: Georgia
RATED
CAPACITY
LOAD
FACTOR
SNSA-COUNTY/PUWT
ENERGY
RQKT.
1012 BTU
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
ASK CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY"
_ TYPE EFF. t tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Atlanta SMSA
Atkinson
(Georgia Pover Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5. McDonough
(Georgia Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
856.4
68
22.01
299.2
299.2
598.4 65 32.56
PCFR
PCTA
PCIA
PCTA
PCTA
PCIA
16 - 84
dee. p. coal gas
84-16
des. p. coal gas
DRY E 90
DRY E 90
DRY E 90
DRY E 90
WET
WET
98
98
1930
1941
1945
1948
1963
1964
220
220
220
270
695
695
<5
<5
54.57
Floyd County
(Georgia Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3.
4
43
39.81
100
dea. p. coal
WT Cycl/E 30/96 1954 220
WET E 95 1954 220
WET E 92 1955 220
WET E 90 1970 1035
<5
Cadsden 40
Atlanta 80
AREA TOTAL
953
39.81
-------
SKSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Clynn County
6. McManus
(Georgia Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
AREA .TOTAL
Maeon SHSA
1 . Arkwrlght
(Georgia Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
AREA TOTAL
Bartow County
1O. Bowen
(Georgia Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF DJSTRIBlfTION
FIRWS BY 6TU t
1C12 BTU
MT % yr COAL OIL GAS
50 PCFR
93.8 PCFR
143.8 64 8.88 04 16
des. p. coal
143.8 8.88
46 PCTA
46 PCTA
43.3 RTAN
181.3 67 13.52 36 - 64
des. p. coal gas
181.3 13.52
700 PCTA 100 - -
700 PCTA 100
1400 50 61.3Z* 100
1400 - 61,32 des p. coal
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Georgia
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. t
WET E 98
WET E 98
DRY E 80
DRY E 83
DRY MECH 70
DRY E 93
DRY E 98.12
DRY E 98
1952
1959
1942
1942
1943
1948
1971
1971
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/ day
TYPICAL
TRAfIS,
D1ST.
Miles
130 <5
245 Savannah 60
145 <5
145
135
145
1305 5
1305
Atlanta 20
* Plant started up U 1971. This figure represents a load factor of SOX (average for Georgia). The actual factor In 1971 was only 6.5*
-------
SMSA-COUNTY/PLAHT
Savannah SHSA
Efflngham County
9. Port Wentworth
(Savannah Electric Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
15. Riverside
(Savannah Electric Power Co.)
Boiler 7 )
8 )
9 )
1
12
AREA TOTAL
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
50
54
103
207
25
25
25
36
111
318
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU 2
* yr~ COAL OIL GAS
PCTA
RTAN
(TTAW
77 15.11 6 61 33
des. coal oil gas
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
GFRO
RFRO
GFRO
RTAN
GTAN
RTAN
RTAN
35 4.77 20 80
des - oil gas
19.88
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Georgia
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. % tons/day Hi1es
WET MC1A 92.5 1957 155 10
WET MCTA 92.5 1961 165
WET MCIA 86.1 1965 320
None None - 1926 V 5
. 1926 }• 45
J
" " ~ 1940
145
1949 J
1953 *5
" •• - 1955 65
-------
SHSA-4BUKTY/PLAIIT
Putnam i County
3. HaTHeeBranch
(Georgia Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
AREA TOTAL
Albany SMSA
7. Mitchell
(Georgia Power Co.)
Boiler 1 **
2
3
AREA TOTAL
Lee Qaunt?
14. Warwick
(Crisp County Power Oo.)
!** AREA TOTAL
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF
FIRING
10'' BTU
m i W
299.2 PCOP
359 POO?
544 POOP
544 . PCOP
1746.2 54 83.04
1746.2 83.04
28.9 PCFR
28.9 PCFR
160.5 PCTA
01 o i ^ft t ^ rirt
Z1S.3 Jo 12. UU
218.3 12.0
10 ** O.W
10 0.40
JJENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
COM. Oil GAS
100
100
100
100 -
100
des. p. coal
100
100
100
100
des. p. coal
100
des. p. coal
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Georgia
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. X
WET E 95 1965
WET E 96 1967
WET E 97 1968
WIT E 98 1969
DRY E 85 1948
DRY E 85 1948
DRY E 92 196A
* * *
REFUSE TYPICAL
COHBVST10H TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
torn/day Wles
610 <5
730
1105
U05 Hacm 35
65 <5
65
375
15 15
Albany 10
** Boiler capacities prorated to give total plant capacity . * No FPC-67 filed.
-------
REFUSE COHBUSTTDN FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Georgia
SMSA-COUNTY/PLAHT
Carroll
County
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
LOAD ENERGY
FACTOR RQMT.
10*2 BTU
* yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
•COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
WANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
8. Yates
(Georgia Power Co.)
Boiler 1 *
2
3
4
5
AREA TOTAL
124
124
124
154
154
"680"
680
62
40.63
40.63
GTAN
GTAN
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
52
MET
WET
WET
WET
WET
MCAX/E
E
E
E/MCAX
E
dee. p. coal
98.2 1950
97.8 1950
97.8 1952
98.6(t)l957
96.B(t}l958
310
310
310
385
385
<5
Atlanta 40
Boiler capacities prorated to give total plant capacity
-------
ILLINOIS
DAVENPORT-ROCK ISLAND MOLINE
BLOOMINGJQiJ- NORMAL
i*%eUal«i i^A 'VsU—r
' plantv *5; lo 15,32' \ """'
0
•
O
O
LEGEND
Places ot 100.000 or more inhabitants
Places of 50.000 lo 100,000 inhabitants
Centnl cities of SMSA's with (ewer lhan 50,000 mhabiUnli
Places ol 25,000 to 50,000 inhabitants outside SMSA't
Standard Metropolitan
aacaa Statistical Areas (SMSA's)
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Illinois, 1971 - "Coal Plants"
AREA
Chicago SMSA
(incl . Grundy Co.)
Davenport-Rock Island-Moline
SMSA
Peoria SMSA
Rockford SMSA
Springfield SMSA
(incl . Christian Co.)
Bureau-LaSalle-Putnam Cos.
Crawford County
Fulton-Mason Counties
Jackson County
Lee-Ogle Counties
Massac County
Montgomery County
Morgan County
Vermill ion County
Williamson County
'.•'aoash County
Wayne County
ILLINOIS STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
6169.7
99.1
1139,8
146.4
1545.4
324.4
200.0
230.0
232.7
131.7
110.4
330.0
354.4
182.3
99.0
20.5
12.5
12318.3
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr .
293.3
4.7
54.0
10.2
71.8.
19.6'
9.7'
9.5.'-
11.0
8.8
69.5
18.8
17.6
10.5
54.9
0.9
0.5
665.7
AREA
POP.
millions
7.116
0.366
0.347
0.276
0.201
0.157
0.020
0.059
0.056
0.082
0.014
0.031
0.037
0.099
0.050
0.013
0.017
8.940
Only
a
106
4.67
0.24
0.22
0.18
0.13
0.09
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.03
0.00
0.01
5.83
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
tons 1012 BTU
yr yr
42.08
2.16
2.05
1.63
1.19
0.84
0.11
0.31
0.30
0.44
0.07
0.17
0.20
0.53
0.27
0.07
0.09
52.51
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b %)
14.3
45.8
3. 8
15.9
1.7
4.3
1.1
3.3
2.7
5.0
0.1
0.9
1.1
5.0
0.5
7.7
18.1
7.9
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Mil P<;
ill I Co
21
<5
5
<5
13
10
l *J
5
x/
5
in
i \j
15
• +J
5
«j
15
1 w
7
5
Includes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel). Includes all plants in
attached data sheets.
* Does jifli differentiate between types of firing— assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Illinois, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants
- identical to table above
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH
FIRING BY BTU % HANDLING
SMSA-COUNTY/PUOT 10^2 BTU
HH X vr COAL OIL GAS
Chicago SHSA
o 14. Uaukegan
Commonwealth Edison
Boiler 10 1 PCFR DRV
12 PCFR WET
13 240 CYCL WET
14 I PCFR/
GFRO WET
15 PCFR/
GFRO WET
16 J PCFR/
GFRO WET
17 121.8 CYCL/
GFRO WET
7 326 PCTA/
GTAN DRY
8 355 PCTA/
GTAN DRY
1042.8 57 ?9T5T 63 - 17
des.p.coal gas
8. Fisk
Commonwealth Edison
Boiler 17-1 T PCFR WET
17-2 Il89.2 PCFR WET
18-1 CYCL WET
18-2 J CYCL WET
19 357.4 PCTA/
GTAN DRY
546.6 45 22753" 50 - 50
des.p.coal gas
YEAR: 1971
STATE: ILLINOIS
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE EFF. X
E
E
E
E
E
E
_
E
E
E
E
C
C
E
95(d)
95(d)
95(d)
95(d)
95(d)
95(d)
_
98(d)
98(d)
98(d)
98(d)
98(d)
98(d)
98(d)
1956 *
1930
1930
1931
1931
1931 /
1952
1958
1962
1942
1942
1943
1949
1959
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
M-Hac
nil c»
.tons/day-
35
> 530
270
730
795
\ <5
} 325
}
620
-------
REFUSE COHBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: ILLINOIS
SMSA-COUHTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
MV
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY
RQKT.
1()12 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. I
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COHBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
Chicago SHSA cont'd
31. Calumet
Coon. Edison
Boiler 1
65 7775"
GTAN/
PCTA
STAfJ/
PCTA
31 - 69
des p-coal/
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: ILLINOIS
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Chicago SMSACont'd.
12. Ridgeland
Commonwealth Edison
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7. Crawford
Commonwealth Edison
Boiler 61 -
62
63
64
65
— J 66
V 1
\
8'
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
1012 BTU
HW % yr COAL OIL GAS
1172
J
1172
j
j
173
173
690 60 38~
•
*
104
239.5
-.
358
70T75" 51 32
CYCL/
GFRO
CYCL/
GFRO
CYCL/
GFRO
CYCL/
GFRO
CYCL/
GFRO
CYCL/
IB" GFRO 1 99
des. oil gas
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
PCTA/
GTAN-
PCTA/
^T GTAN 36 64
des. p. coal gas
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. X
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
-
-
_
.
-
_
DRY
DRY
E
E
E
E
E
E
-
-
-
• -
-
_
E
E
98{d)
98 (d)
98{d)
98(d)
90(d)
90(d)
•
-
.
-
-
_
98(d)
98(d)
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1951
1951
1950
1950
1953
1955
1968
1968
1968
1968
1968
1968
1958
1961
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TOAMS
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day M11es
\ 20
V410
f
\
\410
J
410
410
s%f\
\ 20
v **/sc
7 205
) «-A
1 470
"700
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POMER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: ILLI«OIS
SMSA-COUKTY/PLART
RATED
CAPACITY
m
LOAD
FACTOR
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. (
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
Phiraon SM5A Cont'd.
15. Will County
Commonwealth Edison
Boiler 1
2
3
4
9. Jollet
Commonwealth Edison
Boiler 1
2
3
188
184
298.9
598
1268.9
72
56
60.83
CYCL
CYCL
PCTA
PCTA
100
100
100
100
100
des.p.coal
4
5
71
72
81
82
AREA TOTAL
i
)
y
J
102.8
345.6
633.5
633.5
1787.4 47
«169.7
75.02
293.31
PCFR
PCFR
CYCL/
SFRO
CYCL/
GFRO
CYCL/
GFRO
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
89
des.p.coal
16
gas
HET
WET
DRY
DRY
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
E
E
E
E
••f
91
91
98
98 (d
95.7
95.7
98(d)
1955
1955
1957
1963
1941
1950
1950
1950
1959
385
375
610
1230
20
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
uiujuiuj
99{d)
99(d
99(d)
99{d)
1965
1965
1965
1966
125
.180
6VO
1125
1125
20
-------
REFUSE COHBU5TIOX FOR PQfcfEB GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
ST«TE: ILLINOIS
SHSA-COUKTY/PLANT
Rockford
13.
SHSA
Sabroolce
Conroonwealtb Edison
Boiler 1
2
3
4
AREA TOTAL
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
19.4
35
38
54
1«74~
146.4
LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTO %
IfllZ BTU
X yr COAL OIL GAS
SPRE/
GOPP
SPRE/
GOPP
SPRE/
SOPP
PCTA/
69 TOJ GTAN 55 - 45
des.p.coal gas
10.23
BOTTW
ASH
HANDLING
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. %
MCAX 92(d)
HCAX 92 (d)
MCAX 92(d)
E 96(d)
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1949
1952
1955
1961
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
55
100
110
160
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
<5
Davenport-Rock I si and-NoHne SMSA
24.
Mollne
Iowa-Illinois Gas & Elec.
Boiler 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
AREA TOTAL
Co.
a
8
8
c ••
s
5
10,1
25
25
wn
99.1
SPRE/
GOPP
SPRE/
GOPP
SPRE/
GOPP
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRD
RFRO/
GFRrt
TT 4./Z 8 I »i
4.72 dcs.p.coal 9«
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
none
1942
1942
1942
1918
1918
1918
1952
1953
1954
15
?5
15
10
10
10
20
50
50
<5
-------
REFUSE COHBUSTIOH FOR POWER GENERATION
TEAR: 1971
STATE: ILLINOIS
RATED LOW) ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOH AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPIcni
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION IJJj£
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT 101Z BTU "RIKG "" *™ * HANDLI"G OPE™IQ» "^^^ ^CE
MM t yr COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. X tons/day Miles
Bnrpaj- La galle- Putnam Cauntfes
21.
37.
33.
Hennepin
Illinois Power Company
Boiler 1 75 PCTA/ DRY MCAX 83.5 1953 195 10
STAN
Z 231.3 PCTA/ ORr MCAX 85 1959 610
ISO 70 TO? GTAK 42 - 56
ctes.p.coal gas
Peru
Mount Carmel Public Utility*
15.3 33 0.53 100 - - * * * 20 10
des.p.coal
Princeton
Princeton Municipal Utilities*
2.8 1* 0.04 ---***. 10
des.p.coal gas
AREA TOTAL 324.4 19.64 „ ^
HoUne 60
* No FPC-67 filed.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR TOMER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
ILLINOIS
SreA-COUHTY/PUWT
Peoria
TT~
SMSA
Edwards
Central Illinois Light Co.
Boiler 1
2
RATED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
m %
136
280
4l6~ 65
ENERGY
RQKT.
HP* BTU
yr
22.48
TYPE
OF
FIRING
PCFR
PCFR
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
99 1
des. p. coal
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
Net
Net
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
E
E
98
99
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1960
1968
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
310
645
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
10
41. Keystone
Central Illinois Light Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
7.5
18.8
12.5
15.6
~~
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Cycl
Cycl
Cycl
Cycl
80
80
80
80
1967
1957
1955
1947
3* -66
des. s. coal/gas
10
25
15
20
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GEHERATIOH
YEAR: 1971
STATE: ILLINOIS
SMSA-COUHTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
HW
LOAD
FACTOR
X
EKERSY
RQHT.
10'2 BTJJ
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
B¥ BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
MR POLLUTIOH
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. I
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
PEORIA SHSA Cont'd.
2. Wallace
Central Illinois Light Co.
Boiler 1 1
2 r
3
4
s ^5
7
8
9
10
11. Powerton
Connonwealth Edison
Boiler 1
2
3
4
AREA TOTAL
+0.2
85.3
113.6
45
TOT
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO/
PCFR
GFRO/
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
55
55
105
105
320
1139.8
31
TO5
5+.03
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
TCFS
71
des.p.coal
100
100
100
100
29
gas
100
des.p.coal
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
WET
WET
VIET
Mono. -
CYCL 85
CYCL 65
None
95 to)
95 <<0
96 W
97 (ei)
1925
1925
1925
1925
1939
1941
1949
1949
1952
1958
1926
1929
1930
1940
50
BO
. 80
}l70
230
95
95
180
180
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POKER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: ILLIHOIS
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
KU
LOAD
FACTOR
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
V
TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION
FIRING 8Y BTU % HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY"
COAL OIL 6AS TYPE EFF. X tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
Fulton-Mason Counties
zu. Havana
Illinois Power Company
Boiler 1 •}
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 J
Boilers
. 28.75
each *
230
AREA TOTAL 230
37 9.53
9.53
PC™
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
TOD
des.p.coal
Springfield SHSA
17. Lakeside
Springfield Water Light A
Power Dept.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
All boilers
in range
15-33
32
N.R.
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
PCFR
PCFR
CYCL
CYCL
100
des.p.coal
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
N.R.
DRY
TOY
MET
WET
GRAV
GRAV
GRAV
GRAV
GRAV
GRAV
GRAV
GRAV
N.R.
SCTA
SCTA
SCTA
C
c
E
E
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
70
70
80
96.8
96.8
84.4
84.4
1947-
1950
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
Peoria 25
1938
1939
1945
1947
1951
1961
1965
<5
225
Boilers 2, 3. 4 were converted to oil during 1971 and can no longer burn coal. Bottom handling was "dry"
00
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION F03 POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: ILLINOIS
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Springfield SMSA Cont'd.
Is. liatlnan
Springfield Water Light
Power Oept,
Boiler 31
10. Ktncaid
Coomonwealth Edison
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
Morgan County
51 Meredosia
Central Illinois Public
Company
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
AREA TOTAL
RATED
CAPACITY
MU
&
80
80
659.7
659.7
1319.4
1545.4
Service
28.75
28.75
28.75
28.75
239.4
354.4
LOAD ENERGY
FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
t vr
74 O3
34 BOO
71.88
?T TTTsT
17.61
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU <
COAL OIL GAS
CYCL
CYCL
CYCL
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
100
100
des.p.coal
100
100
100
des.p.coal
99 1
des.p.coal
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
WET
WET
WET
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL YEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE EFF. t
MCAX/E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
85/99
98fd]
98{d)
99.6(1
98.8 1
99.4 1
99.4 1
90
1968
1967
1968
: 1948
t 1948
t 1949
t 1949
1960
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
•CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
255 <5
945 15
94S
Springfield 45
65 15
65
65
65
550
Champaign-Urbana 25
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
SHSA-COUKTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
HH %
ENERGY
BQHT.
1012 BTU
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU t
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
YEAR: 1971
STATEILLINOIS
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL YEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE EFF. t
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
Lee County - Ogle County
39 Rochelle (Ogle Co.)
Rodtelle Huntctp. Utilities.
12.7 51 0.67
72 - 28
des. coal/gas
<5
32.
Dixon (Lee Co.)
Conn. Edison
Boiler 4
5
AREA TOTAL
50
6S
TT9" 66
131,7
57IT
8.82
PCFR/GFRO
PCFR/SFRO
74^-25
des. p. coal/gas
Wet
Met
92{d
95
(d)
(d)
1945
1953
140
200
Rockford 25
Chicago 80
Ho FPC-67 ftlsd.
O
-------
REFUSE COHBUSTIOH FOR POWER 6EHERATIOH
YEAR: 1971
STATE: IU-IW11S
SMSA- COUNTY/PLANT
Jackson County
4. urand Tower
Central Illinois Public
Service Co.
Boiler 1 *
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
AREA TOTAL
Massac County
16. Ooppa
Electric Energy Inc.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
00
^^^ ••«•»• -WJtVA.1
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU *
1012 BTU
MH % vr COAL OIL GAS
•j
. Each
8.6
j
36.3
36.3
IPS. 5
232.7 55
232.7
183.4
183.4
183.4
183.4
183.4
183.4
1100.4 72
OSTO
DbfO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
TToT
11.02 .
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
61TST
100
100
100
100
100
100 - -
TOO -
100
100
100
des.p.coal
100
des.p.coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. X
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
* _ j *
Nor*.
.,
..
..
i*
II
E
E
E
MCTA/
E
MCTA/
E
HCTA/
E
MCTA/
E
MCTA/
E
MCTA/
E
-
-
-
-
-
-
98.5
98.5
97.1
80/98.5
80/98.5
80/98.5
80/98.5
80/98.5
80/98.5
4-A+»1 fa
Tuirr*! REFUSE TVDffAi
JHliJAL rnMRlKTTflN iTriwM.
VCJID nr GUMBUailUn TDiM«
itAK Or "rapariTY" liwn».
OPERATION i-AIW'111 DISTANCE
-tons/day Miles
1924
1924
1924
1924
1924
1924
>950
1950
1958
1953
1953
1954
1954
1955
1955
nas* 3 t-u
15 10
li
15
15
15
15
75
75
235
St Louis 80
495 15
495
49S
495
495
49<5
Marlon 30
1100.4
69.53
-------
REFUSE COHBUSTIOH F0» POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: ILLINOIS
SKSA-CQUNTf/PtANT
RATED
CAPACITY
KM
LOAD
FACTOR
%
ENERGY
RQKT.
1012 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASK
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE
EFF. J
INITIAL
YEAS OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY8
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
Montgomery County
T, Coffeen
Central Illinois Public
Service Co.
Boiler 1
AREA TOTAL
Crawford County
5. Hutsonville
Central Illinois Public
Service Co.
Boiler 1
330
330
330
CYCL
63
100 _:
100
des.p.coal
KET
1965
800
2
3
4
5
6
AKEA TOTAL
lEach
j H.7
70.6
70.6
200 51
200
06
9.76
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
100
100
100
100
100
TOO _^
100
des.p.coal
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
M»r>«
99
99
.2(t)
.5(t)
1940
1940
1941
1941
1953
1954
30
30
30
30
145
145
Springfield 40
St Louis 50
Terre Haute, Ind. 30
* Prorated to give total plant capacity
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: ILLINOIS
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Vermin Ion County
22. Vermilion
Illinois Power Company
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
Williamson County
jg nan on
Southern Illinois Power Co.
AREA TOTAL
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
73.5
108.8
18O
182.3
99
99
LOAD ENERGY
FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
X W
61 TOT53
10.53
« 54.94
54.94
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
PCTA 100 - -
PCTA 100
100
des.p.coal
TOO -
des.p.coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY"
TYPE EFF. X tons/day
DRY HCAX 86 1955 115
DRY MCAX 87 1956 2fo5
A * * 1963 290
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
7
5
NOTE: Plants 23 Wood River, Madison Co., Ill; 25 Venice, 111; and 29 Baldwin, 111. are Included 1n St. Louis SMSA, Missouri
* No FPC-67 filed,
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POKER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT 1Q\2 BTU
KM X vr COAL OIL GAS
Habash County
36. Mount Carmel
Mount Carmel Public Utility*
Boiler 20.5 36 0.9 * 100
des. s. coal
AREA TOTAL 20.5 0.9
Wayr-3 County
34. Fairfield *
Fairfield Kunic. Util. 12.5 32 0.49 100
des. coal
AREA TOTAL 12.5 0.49
YEAR: 1971
STATE: ILLINOIS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. % tons/day Miles
<£>
35
-------
INDIANA
iAclud«A t
1,2,28 in
SMSA
INDIANAPOLIS
SHCLIT
JOHNSON
Slind«'d M'elropoMin
.».St«tl»llC«l *'«»»
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POKER GENERATION
Indiana, 1971 -
(b)
RATED ENERGY
AREA
Anderson SMSA
Evans villa SMSA
(Incl. Spencer County)
Fort Wayne SMSA
Gary-Hammond-East Chicago
SMSA
Indianapolis SMSA
09 South Bend SMSA
6s- Terre Haute SMSA
Cass County
Clinton County
Daviess County
DuBois County
Jefferson County
Knox County
LaPorte County
Miami' County
Montgomery County
Pike County
Rush County
Wayne County
INDIANA STATE TOTALS
CAPACITY
MW
19.0
787.2
20.0
2117.0
939.5
394.0
2084.6
74.2
32.5
18.0
23.5
1303.6
133.0
215.0
40.0
35.2
957.6
8.3
67.5
9269.7
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
neg.
49.2
1.1
110.6
32.;
13.4
94.8
1.7
1.2
0.4
0.7
88.1
8.5
10.0-
1.0
1.4
59.2.
neg.
3.3.
477.6
"Coal Plants" Only
(a)
AREA REFUSE
POP.
millions
0.140
0.255
0.286
0.643
1.132
0.285
0.177
0.041
0.031
0.027
0.031
0.027
0.042
0.107
0.040
0.035
0.012
0.021
0.080
3.412
, GENERATION
10° tons
yr
0.09
0.16
0.18
0.42
0.74
0.18
0.11
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01.
0.02
0.06
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.04
2.20;
10 ' 2 BTU
yr
0.83
1 .51
1.69
3.80
6.69
1.66
1.05
0.22
0.17
0.14
0.16
0.14
0.22
0.57
0.21
0.19
0.06
0.11
0.43
19.9
POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
FROM REFUSE
(a/b %)
3.1
146^9
3.4
20.8
12.4
1 .1
12.7
13.4
30.4
21 .1
1 .7
2.6
5.7
20.4
12.8
0.1
13.0
4.2
DISTANCE
Miles
5
\j
«
\j
<5
<5
"Id
1 *T
<5
14
1 "
5
«•/
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
MW X W
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
YEAR: 1971
STATE: INDIANA
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE
EFF. I
Jefferson County
4.
cutty Creek
(Indiana 4 Kentucky Electric
Co.)
Boiler 1
2
4
AREA TOTAL
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
1303.6 82 86.19
1303.6 88.19
100
100
100
100
100
100 _- -
des. p. coal
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
cc
C
c
c
c
8:1
96.1
96.1
96.1
96.1
INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DIST.
Miles
tons/day
1955 <5
1955
]|§ Louisville, Ky i
1955
1956
37bO
KOTE:
™
Plant
ru ts 1nc'«l«« <" Oh
-4
-------
YEAR: 1971
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION STATE: INDIANA
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
FIRING BY BTU X HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
SMSA-CQUNTY/PLANT id 2 BTU ,_, Miles
MW S W COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. X tons/day mies
DuBois
30.
31.
County
Huntingsburg **
(Huntingsburg Muni. Light &
Power) 2.0 neg.
Jasper
(Jasper Muni. Electric Util.) 21.5 33 0.76
AREA TOTAL 23.5 0.76
Pjike County
5. Petersburg
(Indianapolis Power & Light)
Boiler 1 261.7
2 462.7
724.4 70 44.09
24. Ratts
(Indiana Statewide Elec. Corp.)
Boiler 1
2
233.2 77 15.20 '
AREA TOTAL 957.6 59.29
100 - - * * * <5
des. s. coal
Evansville 45
^ Louisville, Ky 65
100 - *
des. s. coal J|U <5
PCTA 100 - - DRY C 97 1967 fi7n 5
PCTA TOO - DRY E 90 1969 ,-,,05
TOO
des. p. coal oil
100 - - 1969 5
100 ~ ~ 1969 i-
des p. coal
* No form FPC-67 filed
** Standby
00
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD
ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
MM X
South Bend SMSA
7. Twin Branch
(Indiana & Michigan Elec. Co.)
Boiler 1-1
l-2jl-3;l-4
2-1
2-2
2-3
2-4
3
4-l;4-2
5
•"V-> . •
394 35
AREA TOTAL 394.0
•vansville SMSA inc. Spencer County
FIRING BY BTU X
lfl!2 BTU
yr COAL OIL GAS
100
100
100
m-
-
100
100
100
100
13.44 100
des.p. coal
13.44
YEAR: 1971
STATE: INDIANA
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFOSl TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING
TYPE
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
WET MCTA
WET MCTA
WET MCTA
OPtRATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
EFF. X tons/day M*les
Sti
s.0
1926
1925
1927
1925
1926
1926
?5 1941
25 1944
50 1949
575
1. Robert Reid
(Big Rivers Rural Elec. Coop)
Boiler 1
Ky 16. Henderson*
80 74 5.86 PCFR 100
des. p. coal
DRY C
99.5
1965
245
Henderson (plant No. 16) in Sebree Co., Kentucky is not included in data for lack of information. Henderson Station No. 2 (Plant No. 16) in Sebree
Co., Kentucky will be in operation by 1975 and will be so recorded.
00
-------
REFUSE COmUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: INDIANA
RATED
CAPACITY
SHSA-COWTY/PLANT
LOAD
FACTOR
-ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BJU
yr
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BYBTU*
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. %
tons/day
Miles
Evansvllle SHSA Conf d.
Spenser County
2. Warrick
(Alcoa Generating Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
3. Ohio River
(Southern Ind. Gas & Elec.)
432~
PCFR
26.30
DOI :er
i -i
2
3
4
5 J
6
7
8
32.5
20
23
23
23
T2T75 55* "8.19
22. Culley
(Southern Ind. Gas & Elec.)
Boiler
1
2
AREA TOTAL
50
103.7
~153T7 55* "OT
787.2 4
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Gary-Hamnond- East Chicago SMSA
T State Line
(Comnonw. Edison of Indiana)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
11. Baflly
(Northern Indiana Pub. Ser. Co.)
Boiler 7
M
8
12. Dean Mitchell
(Northern Indiana Pub. Ser. Co.)
Boiler 4
5
rt -
-£ 6
11
AREA TOTAL
CAPACITY
m
208
150
225
389
• •«• * "
972
194
421.6
"6T5T6
138.1
138.1
138.1
115.1
529.4
2117.0
FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU *
1012 BTU
X yr COAL OIL GAS
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA/
GTAN
CYCL/
GOPP
61 52.58 ~'7fi " " 30
des.p. coal gas
CYCL/
GFRO
CYCL/
GOPP
47 25.37 92 g
de*. coal gas
PCTA/
GTAN
PCTA/
GTAN
PCTA/
GTAN
PCFR
71 32.66 85 - 14
des.p. coal
110.61
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
DRY/MET
WET
WET
WET
KET
KET
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
YEAR: 1971
STATE: INDIANA
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
EQO
JjJ
E 12
E 98
E 98
E 98.5
E, 98.1
E 90
E 97
E 91
E 93
YEAR OF
OPERATION;
1929
1938
1955
1962
7962
1968
1956
1959
1959
1970
REFUSE
.COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
480
345
520
900
335
736
36 D
VW U
360
wV v
3fiD
JUW
300
•Jv */
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
<5
•15
<5
-------
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Anderson SMSA
Zb. Anderson**
(Anderson Municipal
AREA TOTAL
LnPorte Co'.mty
13. Michigan City "
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTJ
MW X yr
Light & Power) 19 neg.
IQ n
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
TOO
des. s. coal
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
*
YEAR: 1971
STATE: INDIANA
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" >ISTANCE
Miles
TYPE EFF. X tons/day
* * - 5
(Northern Indiana Public Service
Company )
Boiler 1 .
2
3
4
5
6
AREA TOTAL
} 75 m
J PCFR
!CY.CL/
CFRO
140 CYCL/
GFRO
CYCL/
GFRO
215 44 10.04
215.0 10.04
-
:oo
VDO
100
100
cas*p. coal
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
E N,R 1931 \ <5
FE !f8 HI} 145 Gary 25
t 98 1950 South Bend 3S
•* U
E 98 1950 275;
E 98 1951
.r* No FPC-67 filed
** Standby
-------
f\
J-l
SHSA-COIWTY/PLAKT
Fort Mayne SMSA
19. Lawton Park
(Board of Public Utilities
"Ft. Wayne")
AREA TOTAL
Cass County
32. Logansport
{Logansport Municipal Utilities)
AREA TOTAL
Miami County
33. Peru
(Peru Electric & Power Plant)
AREA TOTAL
Clinton County
29 Frankfurt
AREA TOTAL
RATED
CAPACfTY
m
20
20.0
74.2
74.Z
40
40
32.5
32,5
REFUSE COMBUSTION
LOAD ENERGY
FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
I vr~
55** K15
1.15
22 1.73
1.73
25 1.03
1.03
37 1.27
1 27
FOR POWER GENERATION
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
COAL OIL CMS
100
des. s. coal
72 10 18
des. s. coal
100
des. p. coal
B9 11
des. s. coal
YEAR: T971
STATE: INDIANA
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HAKOLIN6 OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. X tons/day Miles
* * * - 50 <5
* * * ~ 70 5
Lafayette 40
* * * - 45 <5
Indianapolis 7
* - 50 __<5.
Lafayette 20
* Hn FPC-67 filed ** State average
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: INDIANA
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU ?!
MW
COAL OIL
GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. g
'tons/day CHILES
MONTGOMERY' COUNTY'
28. CRAWFOR0SV1LLE
Crawfordsville Municipal
Light & Power Company
Boiler
35.2
40
1.48
100
des. s-coal
60
Indianapolis 50
AREA TOTAL:
35.2
1.48
* No FPC-67 Filed
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POifER fiENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE:INDIANA
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQWT.
SMSA-COWITY/PLAHT 10' 2 BTU
MM X yr~
Indianapolis SMSA
9. Stout
(Indianapolis Power & Light Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
3
9
TO
50
60
23. Prttthart
(IndlanapolU Power "a Light Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
*
5
6
—P
SSF 38 TsTST
"a
50
69
69
713.6
"35576 35 TOT"
TYPE
OF
FIRING
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
m
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBimON
BY BTU *
COAL OIL GAS
97 3 -
des.p. coal oil
100
100
100 -
100
100
100
iod -
BOTTOK MR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. X
BRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
BRY
DRY
DRY
WET
WET
DRY
DRY
m
VET
DRY
DRY
DRY
Hone
it
n
M
M
*•
MCTA
MCTA
C
MCTA
RftS
HCTft,
MCTA
C
E
66
66
99
80
75
75
75
99.5 (t)
99.5 (t)
1911
1931
1931
1931
1931
1931
1931
1942
1947
1958
1961
]$%
1941
1953
1953
1956
REFUSE -TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS,
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day HilEfS
<5
l!7c
3/5
65 25
65
75
100
100
170
des.p. coal oil
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
MU
LOAD
FACTOR
%
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
FOR POWER
TYPE
OF
FIRING
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
YEAR: 1971
STATE: INDIANA
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL YEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE EFF. X
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
t tons/day _-_
TYPICAL
; TRAMS.
DISTANCE
MILES
INDIANAPOLIS SHSA (Cont'd.)
35. PERRY K & M
Indiana. Power and Light
Boiler
11
12
13
14
15
16
6
7
8
9
10
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
SPRE 100
SPRE 100
OSTO 100
OSTO 100
OSTO 100
OSTO TOO
OSTO 100
14
TOO
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E-
E
E
E
MCTA
MCTA
None
None
None
None
None
97
97
90
90
92.5
92.5
-
-
—
-
-
1938
1938
1946
1947
1953
1953
1923
1923
1924
1924
1924
<5
50
des. :s. and p.coa'i/oil
-------
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Indianapolis SMSA conti
il. Noblesville
(Public Service
Boiler 1
2
3
AREA TOTAL
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
MH X yr
Co. of Indiana)
•)•> •> PPFC
J-J»O rOrf\
33.3 PCFR
33.3 PCFR
939.5 32.16
Wayne County
ITT ffivftewater Valley
(Richmond Hunk. Lighting & Power)
Boiler 1 37.5 82 3.31
36. Johnson St.**
(Richmond Munic. Lighting & Power) 30 - neg.
AREA TOTAL 67.5 3.31
Rush County
25. Rushvllle
(Public Service
AREA TOTAL
Co. of Indiana) 8.3 neg.
8.3
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
$3 1
des.p. coal
100
des.p. coal
100 - , -
des.s. coal
100
des.s. coal
YEAR: 1971
STATE: INDIANA
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. 1 tons/da>
DRY E 98 1950 « 17
DRY E g8 1950 45-
DRY E 98 1950 45
* * * 1955 140 <5
* * * - <5
Dayton. Ohio_.
Indianapolis
* * * ~ < 5
* No FPC-67 filed
**Standby
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
SMSA-COUNTY/PLAXT 1012 BTU
m « jrr
Terre Haute SMSA
5. Breed
(Indiana and Michigan Elec. Co)
Boiler 1 495.6 46 18.93
1^_ Cayuga
(Public Service Co, of Ind.)
Boiler 1 531 47 21.02
15, Dresser
(Public Service Co. of Indiana)
Boiler 9*
4-1
jj "•)
4-c
51
-1
5*\
-2
61
-1
6n
~Z
71
-1
T50~ 35 ~OT
* Retired 1n 1971: not included in totals (was 60 MW).
Jl
QQ
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
CYCL 100 -
des.p. coal
PCTA 1QO -
des.p. coal
SPRE
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFP.
97 3 -
de s i, Co il
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
WET
DRY
ORY
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
YEAR: 1971
STATE: INDIANA
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL IfEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE EFF. t
CYCL NA I960
E 97 1970
1937
194T
1941
1944
1944
1945
1945
1948
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS,
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day Hiles
830 30
900 35
<5
£55
-------
REFUSE COHBUSTIOH FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: INDIANA
-0
SMSA-COUHTY/PLAKT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR WJMT.
1012 BTU
HU Jl yr~
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU I
BOTTOM
ASK
HANDLING
COAL OIL
GAS
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day
Miles
Terre Haute. SMSA Cont'd.
18. Wabash River
(Public Service Co. of Indiana)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
95S~~
AREA TOTAL 2084.6
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
55 46.70 & 1
des.p. coal
-------
included
1,9,18,22,2*(29 ;„
O
LEGEND
, of 100.000 or more inhabitants
• Places of W.OOO to 100.000 inhabitants
O Places of 25.000 to 50.000 mhab.lants outsidr SMSA'i
jndard MttfOpiMan
L^:-s.-. --.. i StJl.slical Areas (SMSA's)
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Kansas ,1971 - Kansas City SMSA
AREA
All Fossil Fuel Plants
Kansas City SMSA
NOTE: All Kansas City
(b)
RATED ENERGY
CAPACITY RQMT.
MM 1012 BTU
yr
2395.8 91.3
Plants are included in Missouri
(a)
AREA REFUSE
POP. GENERATION
millions 106 tons 101Z BTU
yr yr
1.283 0.84. 7.60
under "Kansas City SMSA".
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b %)
8.3
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
<5
"Coal Plants" only**
Kansas City SMSA
2262.8
89.3
1.283
0.84
7.60
8.5
Includes all plants capable** of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel).
** Does not differentiate between types of firing — assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
** Includes all plants in the Data Tables except 29.
<5
-------
CINCINNATI .
/ -•'-
HUNTINGTON -ASHLAND
KALI
O 10 2O » «O 9OMILE3
LEGEND
® Places of 100,000 or more inhabitants
• Places of 50,000 to 100,000 inhabitants
O Central cities of SMSA's with fewer than 50.000 inhabitants
O Places of 25.000 to 50,000 inhabitants outside SMSA's
Standa-d VetrotDiitan
Statistical Areas (SMSA'sj
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POVIER GENERATION
AREA
Lexington SMSA
(incl. Bourbon Co. & Clark
Co.)
Louisville SMSA
Owensboro SMSA
(incl. Hancock Co.)
S Anderson-Mercer Counties
Bell County
Lawrence County
McCracken County
Kuhlenberg County
Pulaski County
KENTUCKY STATE TOTALS
Includes all plants capable*
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
196
2004.1
543.5
859.1
37.5
1096.8
1750.0
2821.2
344.0
9652.2
of burning
* Does not differentiate between types
Kentucky, 1971 - MCoa^ Plants11 Only
00 (a) POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY AREA REFUSE ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
RQMT. POP. GENERATION _, FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
1012 BTU millions 10b tons ,1012 BTU (a/b *) mil**
yr
5.8
97.1
32.5
30.2
1.0.
57.7;
102.2;;
137.1
17.4-:-
481.5
coal (design
0.221
0.842
0.087
0.026
0.032
0.011
0.059
0.028
0.036
1.342
yr
0.14
0.55'^
0.05
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.02*
0.86;
fuel and/or current fuel).
of firing— assumes all
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION — Identical to
types capable of
table above.
yr
1.31 22.6 17
4.98 5.1 <5
0.51 1.6 17
0.14 0.5 8
0.17 15.7 <5
0.06 0.1 <5
0.31 0.3 <5
0.15 0.1 <5
0.19 1.1 5
7.82 1.6
Includes all plants in attached data sheets.
refuse burning.
Kentucky, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: KENTUCKY
SNSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
HU
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU «
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
mtles
McCracken County
10. Shawnee
Tennessee Valley Authority
Boiler" •"
' ' 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 J
*
*
Each *
• * • 5 ^
*
*
*
*
1750 68 10272S
AREA TOTAL 1750 102.28
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
loo
des.
'-
-
_
;
,.
.
.
.
_
.
p-coal
-
-
_
:
_
_
_
_
.
.
Pulaskl County
2. Cooper
East Kentucky Rural Electric Coop.
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
113.6
230.4
344.0 57
344.0
17.46
17.46
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA/E 60/94
MCTA/E 60/94
MCTA/E 60/94
MCTA/E 60/94
MCTA/E 60/94
MCTA/E 60/94
MCTA/E 60/94
MCTA/E 60/94
MCTA/E 60/94
MCTA/E 60/94
1953
1953
1953
1954
1954
1954
1954
1955
1955
1956
435
435
435
435
435
435
43 S
435
435
435
< 5
Owensboro 95
PCFR
PCFR
100
100
100
des. coal
Dry
Dry
MCTA
MCTA
86(t)
90(t)
1965
1969
245
495
Knoxville.Tenn 80
* P-coal circular firing
NOTE: Plants No. 1 (8>bert Reid, Henderson Co., KY) and No. 16 (Henderson, Henderson Co., KY) are Included In EvansvUle SMSA, Indiana. See Indiana.
-------
o
REFUSE COHBUSTION FOR POWER 5EHERATION
YEAR:
1971
STATE: KENTUCKY
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
KH
LOAD
FACTOR
Z
ENERGY
RQMT.
1Q12 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
Kohlenberg County
6. Green River
Kentucky Utilities Company
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
9. Paradise
TVA
Boiler 1
2
3
AREA TOTAL
Lawrence County
4. B1g Sandy
Kentucky Power Company
Boiler 1
2
75
75
75
75
113
678.6
678.6
1201.0
2558.2
2821.2
265
831.8
1096.8
53 TOT
58 122.3d
137.11
66 17778"
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
CYCL
CYCL
CYCL
100 -
100 •-
100
100
100
100
des.p-coal
100
100
100 -
100
des.coal
_
_
_
.
.
_
«
.
.
PCFR
PCFR
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA 80
HCTA 80
MCTA 80
MCTA 80
MCTA 80
Wet E 95
Wet E 95
Wet E 95
1950
1950
1950
1954
1959
1963
1963
1969
180
180
180
180
270
1385
1385
2455
<5
<5
Owensboro 35
Nashville, Tenn 80
Dry None
Dry E 75
1963
1969
59Q
1855
<5
des.p-coal
Huntington
AREA TOTAL
1096.8
57.78
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: KENTUCKY
RATED
CAPACITY
LOAD
FACTOR
ENERGY
RGMT.
SHSA-eOUNTY/PUWT
BtU
TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
FIRING BY BTU 1 HANDLING OPERATION
COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. %
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRAHS
"CAPACITY"
tons/day m-les
Lexington SHSA
Clark County
3. Dale
East Kentucky Rural Electric Coop.
Boiler
i
2
3
4
AREA TOTAL
24.5
24.5
73.5
73.5
T§6~
196
29 OO
5.80
Anderson-Mercer Counties
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
100
100
100
100 -
TOO -
des.p-coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA
MCTA
HCTA
HCTA
85
85
85
85
1954
1954
1957
1960
30
30
90
90
17
18. Tyrone
Kentucky Utilities Company
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
o
15
15
15
75
T35
24
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Grav
Grav
Grav
Grav
CY.CL
20
20
20
20
81
d 1947
d 1947
d 1948
d 1948
1953
des.p-coal
15
15.
15
15
85
-------
REFUSE COH8USTTON FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: KENTUCKY
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF D^TR!.Bin7ON
SMSA-COUNTY/PLAHT
Anderson-Hercer Counties cont'd
5- Brown
Kentucky Utilities Company
Boiler 1
2
3
AREA TOTAL
Hi' %
113.7
179.5
430.9
7547T 41
859.1
FIRING BT BTU X
1012 BTU
vr COAL OIL GAS
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
„ PCTA 100
26.68 100
des.p-coal
30.27
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION •CAPACITY' DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. t tons/day miles
Dry SCTA 80 1957 175 8
Dry SCTA 80 1963 280
Dry E 90.56 1971 675
Lexington 20
Louisville 60
Bell County
17. Plnevllle
Kentucky Utilities Company
Boiler 6
AREA TOTAL
37.5 23 1.03
PCFR 100
des.p-coal
Dry
37.5
1.08
Thermix 81.7
Standard
Tubular
Dust
Collector
1951 45 <5
Knoxville* Tenn 50
Lexington 90
-------
REFUSE COHBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: KENTUCKY
SMSA-COUNTY/PLAHT
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
KM X vr COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. %
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day Miles
Owensboro SHSA
11. Coleman (Hancock Co.)
19.
15.
Big River
Boiler
Owensboro
Owens boro
Boiler
Rural Electric Coop.
1
2
No. 1
Municipal Utilities
1
2
3
4
170
170
340
7.
7.
7.
74
5
5
5
30.0
~52T? 29
PCFR
PCFR
21.45 97. - 3
des.p.coal
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
TfT(> 99 1
des.coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
MCTA/E
MCTA/E
MCTA/E
MCTA/E
99.5 1969
99.5 1970
70
70
70
90
455
455
10
10
10
45
18
<5
Elmer Smith
Owensboro
Boiler
Municipal Utilities
1
AREA TOTAL
151
TBT
543.
67
5
~97TT 100
des.coal
32.56
Wet
E
97 1971
390
<5
o
oo
-------
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
'Louisville SMSA
7. Cane Run
Louisville
Boiler
Gas & Electric Co.
1
2
3
4
5
6
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
MW % vr
112.5
112.5
147
163.2
209.4
272
1016.6 57 SOT
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
PCFR/
GFRO
PCFR/
GFRO
PCFR/
GFRO
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
88-12
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
AIR
POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPF
t
E
E
E
E
E
EFF. *
98.8
98
98
98.5
99.5
99.4
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1954
1956
1958
1962
1966
1963
v.t ^^ i 'W
REFUSE" i TYPICAL ^ xf
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
A^i^M1*! t
DBS|&tii';-
: HP- -
MU$11A
-•—-**
240
'240
*• " V
315 I
5
350 ;'
585 •
des. p. coal/gas
8. Paddy's Run
Louisville Gas & Electric Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
C
Irtdl7. Gallagher (Floyd County, Indiana)
Public Service Co. of'Indiana
Boiler 1
2
3
4
25
25
69
69
74.75
74.75
337.5 18 JTfS
150
150
150
150
600 70 3TTOT
PCFR/
GFRO
PCFR/
GFRO
PCFR/
GFRO
PCFR/
GFRO
PCFR/
GFRO
PCFR
61 39
des.p-coal /gas
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
99 1
des.p-coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
96.5
96.5
98
98
98
99.1
99
99
99
99
1942
1942
1947
1949
1950
1952
1958
1959
1960
1961
20
20
60
60
65
65
i
4Qp
400
400
<5
0
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: KENTUCKY
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT 1012 BTU ""^ " ™ * ^^ ^^^ "^^ "^
MM X vr COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. t tons/dav miles
t: Louisville SMSA cont'd
20. Canal (standby)
Louisville Gas & Electric Co.
Boiler 1 25
2 25
~50 3.0 (TT
PCFR/ Dry £90 1937 - <5
GFRO
PCFR/ Dry E 96 1941
GFRO
8 • . .
des.p-coal/gas
AREA TOTAL
2004.1
97.19
-------
MAINE
Places of 50,000 to 100,000 mhahilanls
O Central cities ol SMSA's w.lh Ipwer than 50.000 mhab.linu
O Places ol 25.000 to 50,000 inhabitants outsidt SMSA's
Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSA's)
VCALK
W M «0
111
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
AREA
Maine,
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
1971 - All
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
Fossil Fuel
AREA
POP.
millions
Plants - Portland Only
(a)
REFUSE
. GENERATION ,9
10b tons 10U BTU
yr yr
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b %)
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
Portland SMSA
213.6
14.5
0.197
0.12
1.16
8.0
10
Includes one plant, as detailed in attached data sheet.
This plant is not capable of coal firing.
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
, 1971 - "Coal Plants" Only
-- None.
-------
SKSA-COUNTY/PLAHT
Portland SMSA
Wyman
Central Maine Power Conpany
Boiler 1
2
3
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012
MM *
45
45
123.6
5T3T6" 77
DM FOR POWER
iY TYPE
OF
FIRING
yr~
RFRO
RFRO
RTAN
>3~
GENERATION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
100
100
des. oil
YEAR
'• 1971
t. Maine.
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE
GRAV/
MCTA
GRAV/
MCTA
GRAV/
MCTA
EFF. 3!
20-40
20-40
20-40
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
1957
1958
1965
129 ,0
129
355
1971 AREA TOTAL
213.6
14.93
-------
LEGEND
® Pisces o( 100.000 or more mha&itants
• Places of 50,000 to 100.000 inhabitants
O Places ol 25,000 to 50,000 inhabitants outside
i Standard Metropolitan
• •• -• "*•** StJtistiCa! Areas (SMSA's)
Q /// a*£##r*w &y
-------
REFUSE COMBUST1QH FOR POWER GENERATION
Maryland, 1971 - "Coal Plants" Only
(b) (a) POTENTIAL TYPICAL
RATED ENERGY AREA REFUSE ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
CAPACITY RQMT. POP. GENERATION FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
AREA MW ,ni«BTU millions tons 1nl,BTU (a/b %)
10 '^yr 100 yr 1012
Baltimore SMSA 1747.8 104.8 2.110 1.39 12.48 11.9
Washington SMSA
(incl. Charles, Calvert,
and St. Mary's Counties) 3388.6 251.0 3.040 1.99 17.98 7.2
Washington County 148.3 6.6 0.106 0.06 0.57 8.6
Dorchester County 256.6 6.8 0.030 0.01 0.16 2.3
MARYLAND STATE TOTALS 5541.3 369.4 5.290 3.47 31.19 8.4
Includes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel). Includes all plants in
attached data sheets.
* Does not differentiate between types of firing -- assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
miles
<5
26
15
10
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION ._ MMiHr»l to table above.
Maryland, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Maryland
SMSA-C0UNTY/PLANT
Baltimore SMSA
1 . Crane
Baltimore Gas & Electric
Boiler 1
2
2. Gould St.
Baltimore Gas & Electric
Boiler 1
2
3
3. Riverside
Baltimore Gas & Electric
Boiler I
2
3
4
5
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQKT.
1(H2 BTU
HK X 7r~
190.9
208.9
399.8 76 26.00
35
35
103.5
T73T5" 40 8.57
60
60
60
72
81.5
31375 51* 20.86
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
CYCL
CYCL
50 50
des.p.coal
oil
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
28 71 1
des. oil
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
100
des. oil
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY"
TYPE FfF I tons/tkv
Wet
Wet
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
MCTA
MCTA
E
E
E
E
MCTA
MCTA
70/63
70/55
63/60
63/60
95/60
90/70
85/70.7
70
50
50
1961
1963
1926
1926
1952
1942
1944
1948
1951
1953
525
575
65
65
190
160
160
160
190
2 15
<5
<5
<5
* State Average.
-------
REFUSE COmUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Maryland
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Baltimore SHSA cont'd
4. Wagner
Baltimore Gas & Electric
Boiler 1
2
5. ttestport
Baltimore Gas & Electric
Bofler 1 ***
2
3
4
16. Pratt Street
Baltimore Gas & Electric
Boiler 1
AREA TOTAL
RATED
CAPACITY
Ml
132
136
359
«?•/?
WT
32.3
32.3
59.5
69.9
T§4~
20
1747.8
LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
X yr COAL OIL GAS
PCFR
PCFR
prnp
70 37.66 98 2
des. p. coal
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
4? 10.52 1 99 -
des. oil
51** 1.25 100
des. coal
104.66
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. »
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
*
moo
UJUIUIU
*
95/73
92/76
98/Nft
77/65
77/65
93/80
87/80
*
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1956
1959
1966
1940
1940
1941
1950
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day mHo*
335
345
915
75
75
135
160
50
<5
<5
<5
* No FPC-67 filed.
** State Average.
Capacities prorated to give plant total.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Maryland
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
* ^T
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU 2
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. I
Washlnqton SMSAMncl. Charles, Calvert.
St. Mary's Counties)
Ya 1. Potomac River, va.
Potomac Electric Co.
Boiler 1
2
~ 3
CA
4
5
Va 4. Possum Point, V».
Virginia Electric & Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
95.4
95.4
108
108
108
514.8
69
69
113.6
239.4
491
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
60 2OO
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
73 37766"
99 1
des.p.coal
100
100
100
100
100
des.p.coal
oil
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCAX/C
MCAX/C
MCAX/C
MCAX/C
MCAX/C
E
E
E
E
92
96.
94.
93.
93.
72
72
72
72
(t)
1 (t)
6 (t)
5 (t)
6 (t)
1949
1950
1954
1956
1957
1948
1951
1955
1962
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day mi IP*
215
215
245
245
245
195
195
325
690
26
30
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
VEAR: 1971
STATE: Maryland
SMSA-COUNTY/PUWT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
lO1* BTU
HH 1 yr~
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. 1 tons/day miles
Washington SMSA-Charles . Calvert &
^t. Mary's Counties cont'd
9.
1
10.
11.
Dicker-son
Potomac Electric Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
Buzzards Point
Potomac Electric Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
Horgantown
Potomac Electric Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
195.5
195.5
195.5 — — — .
556T5" 51** 28.82
33
33
51
51
51
51
270 51** 15.68
625.5
625.5
1251 84 83.23
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
92 8 -
des.p.coal
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA/
RTAN
PCTA/
DT4M
40 60
des. oil
PCTA/
RTAN
PCTA/
PTflM
21 79
Dry
Dry
Dry
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
E
C
C
C
C
C
C
E
E
86.8
95(t)
98.2(t)
90
90
90
90
90
90
99.5
99.5
1959
1960
1962
1933
1934
1940
1941
1943
1945
1970
1971
405
405
405
80
80
125
125
125
125
1840
1840
30
<5
40
des. p. coal,oil
** State Average.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Maryland
RATED
CAPACITY
LOAD
FACTOR
ENERGY
RQMT.
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
Hashlnflton SMSA-Charles. Calvert S
St. Mary's Counties cont'd
99. Benning
Potomac Electric Power Co.
Boiler 21
23
22
24
1
3
5
7
2
4
6
8
9
n
13
15
10
12
14
16
25
26
27
All
below
7.5
55
88
289
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
RFRO/
PCFR
RTAN/
PCTA
RTAN
31
27.49
24 76
des.p.coal
on
BOTTOM
ASH
TYPE EFF. t
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
OPERATION' "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
Jtons/day miles
1918
1918
1918
1918
1924
1924
1927
1927
1924
1924
1927
1927
1929
1929
1929
1929
1929
1929
1929
1947
1952
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
None"
n
„
«
,:
H
HCAX
MCAX
Non«
1
MCAX
HCAX
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
HCAX
MCAX
MCAX
E
MCAX/C
None
_
_
.
-
»
-
93
93
-
.
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
93
96
89. 2/
74.6(t)
1968
80
130
430
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Maryland
SMSA- COUNTY/ PLANT
Washinaton SMSA-Charl es , Calvert &
St. Marv's Counties pppt'rt
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
LOAD
FACTOR
%
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EKF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTII
"CAPACIT
tons/day
14. Chalk Point
Potomac Electric Power Co.
Boiler
1
2
AREA TOTAL
363.8
363.8
727T6
3388.6
51 32TT4
251.02
PCOP
PCOP
Dry
Dry
97.5
97.5
des.p.coal
1964
1965
685
685
TYPICAL
miles
30
Washington County
8. Smith 1 & 2
Potomac Edisoti Co.
3
5 Boilers in
7 range
9 16-91 MW
11
109.5
59
6.33
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
PCFR
PCTA
100
100
TOO
: 100
100
100
\00
des
-
.p. coal
Dry-
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
SCTA
SCTA
SCTA
SCTA
E
E
50
50
50
50
97.5
99.7
1923
1923
1927
1936
1947
1957
15
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR PDHER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Maryland
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Hashington County con't
's- Hagerstown (cold standby)
Hagerstown Electric
AREA TOTAL
Dorchester County
6. Vienna**
Delmarva Power & Light Co.
Boiler 1
3
4
> I
J 6
O
7
AREA TOTAL.
RATED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
HW X
38.8 7
148.3
12
7.5
7.5
15
15
37,5.
21675 19
ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
yr COAL OIL GAS
0-33 43 52
des. p. coal oil
6.66
no.
OSTO
OSTO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RTAN
6.88 88 12
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
*
None
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. t
* *
None
GRAV 50
MCTA 75
KCTA 75
MCAX 65
MCAX 65
MCAX 87.5
INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day miles
10 5
1957 10 10
1941 5
1945 5
1947 15
1949 15
1951 40
1971 180
* No FPC-67 filed.
** Units 1, 2,3,1- retired December 1972.
Units 5,6,7,8 are now oil fired (5,6,7 were PCFR)
Boiler 1 - des oil
-------
LAWRENCE-HAVERHILL
N3
U>
FITCHBURG-LEOMINSTER
SPRINGFIELD-CHICOPEE-HOLYOKE
NEW BEDFORD
PROVIDENCE-PAWTUCKET-WAR WICK
• ':":< \^ FALL RIVER
LEGEND
® Places of 100.000 or more inhabitants
• Places of 50.000 to 100,000 inhabitants
O Central Cities of SMSA's with fewer than 50.000 inhabitants
O Places of 25.000 to 50.000 inhabitants outside SVSA's
i Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSA's)
CO
CO
—»
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Massachusetts, 1971 - "Coal Plants" Only
(b)
RATED ENERGY
CAPACITY RQMT.
AREA MW , 19BTU
1
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Massachusetts
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Boston SMS A
2. Mystic I
(Boston Edison Co.)
Boiler 1
- 2
£ 3
*
Mystic II
(Boston Edison Co.)
Boiler 4
5
6
4. New Boston
(Boston Edison Co.)
Boiler 1
2
12. Salem Harbor
(New England Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
RATED
CAPACITY
HW
50
50
50
150
156
15fc
156.8
468.8
380
380
760
81.9
81.9
156
319.8
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQHT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
X yr~
RTAN
RTAN
RTAN
38 7.40
RTAN
RTAN
RTAN
48 19.94
ROPP
ROPP
72 72.34
PCFR/
RFRO
PCFR/
RFRO
PCFR/
RFRO
S3 15.68
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
COAL ML GAS
100
100
100
100
des.p.coal oil
100
100
100
100
des.p. coal oil
100
100
100
des . oil
100
100
100
100
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
E 95(d)
E 95 (d)
E 95 (d)
E 95 (d)
E 95 (d)
E/MnO
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1943
1945
1947
1957
1959
1961
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
miles
tons/day
105 5
105
105
280 5
280
280
scrub 95(d)/90(t)
DRY
DRY
WET
WET
WET
Hone
•
E 80
E 80
E 80
1965
1967
1951
1952
1958
950 5
950
165 5
165
315
d«s. p. coal oil
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Massachusetts
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT RIEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION
SHSA-COUNTY/PLAItT 1012 BTU "*"* " ^ *
HW X yr COAL OIL 6AS
Boston SMS A- Cont'd
3. L-Street
(Boston Edison Oo.)
Boiler -v
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
75
76 J
100
100
All bollerf 100
under - 100
' 100 MW 100
100
100
100
100
BOTTOM AIR PQLLUTIOK
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
TYPE
Z
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
EFF. <
80 (dj
80(d)
80(d)
80 (d)
80 (d)
80{d)
84
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Massachusetts
RATED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Boa ton.
23.
18.
21.
SMSA- Cont'd
Kendall Square
(Cambridge Electric Light Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
Blackstone Street
(Cambridge Electric Light Go.)
Boiler Breakdown Not Available
Lynnway 1+2**
(Massachusetts Electric Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
HW %
Common
Steam
Header
67.5 56
*
24.8 31
Common
Steam
Header
49 40
ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
RtJMT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION
FIRING BY
1Q12 BTU
yr COAL
RPRO
RFRO
RFRO
3.63
des. p.
coal
0.75
des.
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO
2.06
des.
BTU S HANDLING OPERATIOK "CAPACITY"
OIL GAS TYPE EFF. % tons/ day
None E flnop- 1949
None K 1 eratlve 1949
None E L 1953
70 30
130
oil gas
* * * 20
55 45
oil gas
too - None None
100 • None None
100 - None None
100 - None None
100
oil gas 115
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
5
•J
K.
J
** Plant Rettred 12/31/72
* Ho FPC-67 filed
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GEHEMTIOH
YEAR:1971
STATE:Massachusetts
N>
RATED
CAPACITY
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
MU
Boston SMS A- Cont'd
1. Edgar II**
(Boston Edlaon Cos.)
Boiler 9 87.1
10 87.1
11 87.1
261.3
•*RE^ TOTAT- »»"ft f
** Edgar I Retired 11/1/71. Capacity ma 72.5 Mf,
Fitchburg-Leominster-Worcester SMSA
20. Fltchburg
(Fltchburg Gas & Electric 03.)
61.4
15. Vebater Street'
(Mataachuaetta Electric O>.)
Boiler 15 (retired 12.31.72) 34.5
AREA TOTAL 95.9
LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIRPfXnmnn iiiT-riai orm-jr T«DT«,
FACTOB RnMT nc nTSTDinirrrnM IT fllK P°t-LUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
FACTOR RQMT. OF °gTJ}J^rON «H CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
1012 BTU HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
_J yr COAL OIL OK TYPE EFF t tons/da v
RTAH - 100 - IKY £ 95 (dj 1949 170
MAN - 100 DHf g 95 19Vi i?"
47 14.57 - 100
des. p.
coal oil gaa
113.69
current fuel diat. was 1001 oil, initial year of operation 1925.
* ' * * 105
39 2.50 1 73 26
dea. p.
coal oil gas
50 1.66 PCFR 91 9 - DRY SCTA NR 1950 70
dea. a. coal oil
4.16
miles
5
22
<5
* No FPC-67 filed
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GEHERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Massachusetts
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Springfield -ChicOpee-Bolyoke SKSA
b. Ht. TOD
(Holyoke Water and Power Co.)
Boiler 1
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
136
LOAD
FACTOR
%
59***
ENERGY
RQHT.
1012|TU
vr
7.00
TYPE
OF
FIRING
POT
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
8V BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100
des.p. coal oil
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE EFF, X
DRY
c
95*
1960
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons /day
300
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
5
10. Vest Springfield
(Western Mass. Electric O>.)
Boiler 1
2
3
24. Riverside V
(Bolyoke Water asd Power Co.)
Bailer 9
8
6
3
46
50
113.6
209.6 62 13.19
Range 2-18
44.S 19 O.S8
PCTA/
RTAH
PCTA/
RTAN
PCIA
PCFR/
RFRO
RFRO
KFRQ
WHO
14 62 24
des. oil gas
100
100
100
100
100
dee. p. coal, oil
DRY E 65 1949
DRY t 67 1952
DRY E 98.8/70**1957
NR HCTA S4 1943
None None - 1936
-» * 1924
<• » 1921
120
130
300
35
* Efficiency b«*e4 on coal firing.
** 98.8Z for coal, 701 for oil.
y la addition, boilers 1,2,4 operate aa energency backup only. These 3 boilers are OSTO fired, with dry bottom *ah handling, built in. 1921-22.
"** State average
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POKER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE: Massachusetts
SWA-
COUNTY/PLANT
Sprlngf leld-Chicopee-golvofce SMSA -C
16. Halyoke
(ftjlyoke Gas tad Electric)
Boiler 5
6
7
B
AREA TOTAL
Barnatable County
T. Canal
(Ctnal Electric Oo.)
Boiler 1
AREA. TOTAL
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRA«S.
FIRING BY BTU X HANDLIH6 OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
10'2 BTU Miles
W 1 vr COAL OIL GAS TTPE EFF. X tons/day
onjt
PCFR/ DRY MCIA 80 1960 5
&FKD/
Range crso
5- \f PCFR/ DRY MCIA. 80 1954
i- RF80/
GFRO
RFHO/ Mone. Mone . 1941.
CFRO
RTRD/ * • 1947
CFRO
30 « 1.29 7 6l 32 55
des.B.p,
coal oil ga«
420.4 22.36
542.5 75 32.00 HOPP 100 Mone *fene - 1968 1370 W
des. oil
BUatca 50
542.5 .,.,32.00 ^^d^^. rr 1A
-------
REFUSE CWffitJSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Massachusetts
SMSA-CpUNTY/PLANT
Fall River-Hew Bedford SMSA
"" TV* Sdnersei; " "" '
(Mootaop Electric Cb.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
11. Bray ton Point
— (New England Power Co.>
(X) Boiler 1
p
^ 2
3
19. Hathaway St.
(Fall River Electric Co.)
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
148
", 181
329
241
241
642.7
1124.7
14.3
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQW. OF
FIRING
10*2 BTU
X yr
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RTAN
RTAN
RTAN
56 19.44
des
PCTA/
RTAN
PCTA/
RTAN
POOP/
ROPP
72 66.12
des
9 0.13
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
14 86
.p. coal oil
100
100
100
100
.p. coal oil
100
de%. oil
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. t
DRY None
DRY
DRY »
DRY "
DRY u
PRY "
DRY MCTA 85
WET MCTA 85
WET E 90
WET E 90
WET X 84.5
* * *
INITIAL REFUSE r TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
miles
tons/day
1925 ^
1928
1925
1928
1925
1943
1952
1959
830
1963 575 7
1964 575
1969 1540
* 5 7
* No FPC-67 filed
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Masaachuaetts
SKSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Fall River-New Bedford SMSA-Cont'd
8. Cannon St.
(New Bedford Gas fit Edison £1.
Co.)
Be Her 1
**•
Lw
pJ 2
3
7
8
10
25 }
26 L
27 j
26 '
29
30
AREA TOTAL
RATED
CAPACITY
HU
Lt.
12.5
12.5
38
6
5
3
(5.5)
(5.5)
(5.5)
(5.5)
7.5
7.5
93
1561.0
LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU t
1Q12 BTU
% yr COAL OIL GAS
PCFR/
RFRO/
GFRO
PCFR/
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
60 7.42 - 76 24
des.p. coal oil gas
93.11
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. %
DRY E 78 1947
DRY E 79 1947
Hone E 88 1950
* None - 1956
o -» - 1956
-« - 1967
-« - 1922
~. - 1922
- ,i -„ - 1922
,, — - 1922
- . SCIA 95 1941
- " SCIA 95 1941
REFUSE -TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
miles
tons/day
35 7
35
120
15
15
5
20
20
* Boilers 25-28 Retired in 1971 and therefore not included in total capacity.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Haasachucatta
SfGA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
HW S
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TWICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
COAL OIL
GAS
TYPE EFF.
Brockton-Taunton-Brlatol SHSA
• 9. West Varer St.
(Taunton Municipal Lighting)
Boiler 1 "
2
3
4
5
6
7
13. deary
(Taunton Municipal Lighting)
Boiler 8
17. E. Brldgewater
(Brockton Edleon
AREA TOTAL
Range
2.25-18
49'
20
97.3
31
28.3 59
H
1.89
0.23
4.09
RFRO
RFSO
RFRD
RFRO
RERO
RFRO
RFRO
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
des.coal oil
RFRO
dea.
del.
100
oil
LOO
oil
MR
MR
NX
H«
SR
HR
NR
NbrKL
MCTA 80
None
tons/day
1926
1927
1928
1933
1942
1951
1957
1966
80
80
10
idles
10
10
* No FPC-67 filed
-------
MICHIGAN
HAWS.
»% 0' inOOOO O« "l
H 0' SO 000 l
C •••"•' "'"» •' 1MS* » •''" '"" '"•" 10000
Pl«l»\ «' Ji 000 10 V) 000 .nniu.ll'ilt OUIIKU
5*
u>i» OHip pM 20,31 in
135
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Michigan, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants
(b) (a)
RATED ENERGY AREA REFUSE
AREA
Bay City SMS A
Detroit SMSA
(incl. St. Clair Co.)
Grand Rapids SMSA
Kalamazoo SMSA
Lansing SMSA
Muskegon-Muskegon Heights
SMSA
Saginaw SMSA
Baraga County
Branch County
Calhoun County
Charlevoix County
Grand Traverse County
Huron County
Marquette County
Delta County
i-iICHIGAN STATE TOTALS
CAPACITY
MW
1144.5
5661.3
747.3
206.0
467.5
530.5
103.5
18.8
11.1
30.0
41.8
35.0
121.0
174.7
29.0
9322.0
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
67.5
335.9
32.9
13.2
16.7
36.5
1.3
1.4
0.5
1.3
2.9
1.2
2.1
12.0
1.8
527.9.
POP.
millions
0.119
4.405
0.548
0.206
0.388
0.160
0.224
0.008
0.039
0.145
0.017
0.040
0.035
0.066
0.036
6.436
GENERATION.
106 tons
yr
0.07
2.89
0.36
0.13
0.25
0.10
0.14
0.00
0.02
0.08
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.02
4.19
101Z BTU
yr
0.70
26.05
3.24
1.22
2.29
0.95
1.32
0.04
0.21
0.77
0.09
0.21
0.19
0.35
0.19
37.82
POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
(a/b %)
1.0
7.3
9.8
0.2
13.7
2.6
99.2
2.7
35.6
56.2
3.0
16.8
9.0
2.9
10.6
7.2
miles
<5
13
27
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
5
5
<5
20
<5
<5
Includes all plants detailed on attached data sheets.
IT
-------
COmuSUOM FOR POMER GENERATION
Michigan, 1971 -
AREA
Bay City SMSA
Detroit SMSA
(incl. St. Clair Co.)
Grand Rapids SMSA
Kalamazoo SHSA
Lansing SHSA
Muskegon-Muskegon Heights
SHSA
Saginaw SHSA
Baraga County
Branch County
Calhoun County
Charlevoix County
Grand Traverse County
Huron County
Marquette County
Delta County
MICHIGAN STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
HW
1144.5
5503.3
747.3
206.0
467.5
530.5
103.5
18.8
11.1
30.0
41.8
35.0
J21.0
174.7
29.0
9145.5
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
67.5
329.4
32.9
13.2
16.7
36.5
1.3
1.4
0.5.
1.3:
2.9
1.2,
2.1
12.0
1.8
520.5
"Coal Plants" Only
AREA
POP.
millions
0.119
4.405
0.548
0.206
0.388
0.160
0.224
0.008
0.039
0.145
0.017
0.040
0.035
0.066
0.036
6.436
106
Q.07
2v89
0.36
0.13
0.25
0.10
0.14
O.OC
0.02
0.08
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.03:
0.02
4.19
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
tons TO12 BTU
yr yr
0.70
26.05
3.24
1.22
2.29
0.95
1.32
0.04
0.21
0.77
0.09
0.21
0.19
0.35
0.19
37.82
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b X)
1.0
7.9
9.8
9.2
13.7
2.6
99.2
2.7
35.6
56.2
3.0
16.8
9.0
2.9
10.6
7.3
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
<5
13
27
<5
<5
<5
<5
<5
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Detroit SMSA
7. Mistersky
(Detroit Public Lighting Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
11. River Rouge
Detroit Edison
Boiler 1
2
3
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
MM X yr
20
20
20
20
44
50
T74 45 7.40
283
292
358.2
933.2 65 5O3
TYPE
OF
FIRING
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
PCTA
PCFR
PCTA
PCFR
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU $
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
100
.100
100
100
100 -
des p. coal
92 8
des p coal/oil
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Wet
Wet
Dry
Dry
Dry
YEAR: 1971
STATE: MICHIGAN
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. %
None
tt —
H ~
1* —
C 96.5
C 97.7
C 90
C 97.2
C 96.7
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1927
1927
1927
1930
1950
1958
1956
1907
1958
REFUSE TWICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTNACE
mi 1 es
tons/day
35 7
35
35
35
60
90
660 7
680
840
NOTES:
,,ants No. 5 (Whiting) and no. 18 (Monroe) are included 1n the Toledo SMSA (see Ohio)
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQNT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT 1012 BTU
m % vr COAL OIL GAS
Detroit SHSA Cont'd
9. Del ray
(Detroit Edison)
Boiler 1
7
8
9
10
11
J, 12 J
OSTO/
GOPP
OSTO
GOPP
TOTAL OSTO/
GOPP
k 225 OSTO/
GOPP
OSTO/
GOPP
OSTO/
GOPP
OSTO/
, GOPP
2
3
4
5
6
OSTO/
8R/
TOTAL GOPP
150 OSTO/
GOPP
OSTO/
GOPP
OSTO/
GOPP
37? 52 25771 - 75 25
des. oil/gas
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
YEAR: 1971
STATE: MICHIGAN
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
miles
TYPE EFF. X tons/day
MCTA * 1942 7
>
HCTA * 1938
HCTA * 1938
HCTA * 1940 >
600
HCTA * 1939
HCTA * 1941
MCTA * 1940 '
"
HCTA * 1929 I
HCTA * 1929 1 400
HCTA * 1929 f
I
* No longer In use* Plant converted to oil/gas March 1970. No longer equipped to burn coal (Dec. 31, 1970: FPC-67)
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTIOK FOR POHEft 6EKERATIOH
TEAR: 197T
STATE: MICHIGAN
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
KM
LOAD
FACTOR
%
ENERGY
RQKT.
1012 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. t
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
1 TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
Detroit SHSA- Cqnt'd
12. St. Clair
Detroit Edison
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
O
10. Harysvllle
Detroit Edfson
Boiler 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
169
156
156
169
358
353
544
T905
TOTAL
150
TOTAL
150
300"
76
48 TTlff
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
CYCL
PCFR
PCTA
97 3 -
des.p.coaVoll
OSTO
OSTO
osro
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
99 - 1
des.s. 8 p. coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
C 91
C 93
C 93
C 93
E 62
C 96
E 98.4
None
None
Hone
None
None
None
E 96.2
E 96.2
E 99.5
E 99.5
1953
1953
1954
1954
1959
1961
1969
1922
1923
1926
1927
1926
1930
1942
1943
1947
1943
440
400
400
440
935
920
1420
18
45
360
360
-------
STKTE: VtttHIWW
SHSA-COWm/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
HI
LOAD
FACTOR
I
ENERGY
RQHT.
10*2 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRIN6
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL
GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. t
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPCIAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
Detroit SMSA- Cont'd
15. Kyandotte
tyandotte Dept. of Municipal Services
Bailer 1 4
2 4
3 6
4 10
5 22
46"
40. Hyandotte-North
Detroit Edison
Boiler 7
9
]0
11
: 12
19
TTSff
54TT 23
Wyandotte-South
Detroit Edison
HYANDOTTE TOTALS
common header system
18.5
72.6
47
0.83
2.26
OSTO
OSTO
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
100
100
100
100
100
des.
til
des.
100
_ _
-
. _
.
-
s.coal
6 13
p. coal
oil gas
.
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Met
Wet
ttl
Gray
Gray
HC7A
MCTA
MCTA
None
C
C
E
E
N.R
N.d
60
eo
95
.
97
99
des.s.coal
1933
1933
1942
1943
1958
1942
1948
1943
1968
1968
5
15
35
-------
REFUbE COMBUSTION FO* POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: MICHIGAN
SHSA-COWTVPUWT
RATED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
MM %
ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM
RQKT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASK
FIRING BY BTU % HANDLING
1012 BTU
yr COAL OIL GAS
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL YEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE EFF. %
Detroit SHSA- Cont'd
13.
^^
*
t.
Trenton Channel
Detroit Edison
Boiler 1
2
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
n
12
13
14
Cont'd next page
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
23
PCOP/
/*Ann
GOPP
PCOP/
GOPP
PCOP/
GOPP
PCOP/
GOPP
PCOP/
GOPP
PCOP/
GOPP
PCOP/
GOPP
PCOP/
GOPP
PCOP/
GOPP
PCOP/
GOPP
PCOP/
GOPP
PCOP/
GOPP
PCOP/
GOPP
Dry
try
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
1925
1925
1924
1924
1924
1924
1924
1924
1926
1927
1927
1928
1929
REFUSE TYPCIAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
miles
tons/day
65 7
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
* 85{d) not used now (gas-fired boilers)
-------
REFUSE COHBUSTIOH FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR- ;97i
STATE: MICHIGAN
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACJTT FACTOR RQKT.
SCA-COCMTir/PLANT
Mi
BTU
yr
TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AW POLLUTION INITIAL flERKE TYPICAL
OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL «AR OF COMBUSTION TBANS.
FIRING Bf BTU I WNDLING OPERATIC* "CAPACITr DISTANCE
relies
COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. S tons/day
Detroit SHSA- Cont'd
13. Trenton Channel (continued)
Boiler 16
17
9A
19
26. Peonsalt
Detroit Edison
Boiler 21
22
23
24
37. Enrico Fenrt
petrolt Edison)
Boiler 1
60
60
60
536.5
10757?
3.25
3.25
3.25
3.25
TT
T58
T55
70 7T75T
PCTA'
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
E
E
E
95
95
95
95
98.5
1949
1945
1949
1969
1949
170
170
170
1525
170
72
24 1TOT
33
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
99 1 -
lies. p. coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
HCTA 53
MCTA 53
C 98
C 96
Tangential
Fired -
100
100 -
des.olT
Mon« Hone. -
1934
1941
1948
1949
1966
10
10
10
10
275
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATE
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT 101* BTU
HM S yr COAL OIL GAS
Detroit SM3A - Cont'd
8. Ccnners Creek
(Detroit Edison)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
6
9
— 10
Jr
J~ ]1
12
13
OTSO/GOPP/
ROPP
OSTO/GOPP/
ROPP
OSTO/GOPP/
ROPP
OSTO/GOPP/
ROPP
TOTAL OSTO/GOPP/
L 315 KW ROPP
OSTO/GOPP/
ROPP
OSTOjGOPP/
ROPP
OSTO/GOPP/
ROPP
OSTOJ50PP/
ROPP
OSTO/SOPP/
ROPP
14 -* OSTO/SOPP/
> ROPP
15 A
16
17
18
PCFR
TOTAL PCFR
270
PCFR
PCFR
YEAR: 1971
STATE :«ICH1GA?I
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. t
0*«v 60
Grav 60
Grav 60
Grav1 60
Grav 60
Grav 60
Grav 60
Grav 60
Grav 60
Grav 60
Grav 60
C 99
C 99
C 99
C 99
INITIAL REFUSE TYPCIAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
miles
tons/day
1934 >j 7
1935
1935
1935
1939
1939
1937
1937
1936
1936
1936 '
1951
705
1951 |
1951
1951
585 53
61 6 33
des.s.p.coal
oil - gas
AREA TOTAL
5661.3
335.93
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 19?1
STATE: MICHIGAN
SKSA-COUNTtV PLANT
Lansing SHSA
5. Eckert
(Lansing Board of Hater and
Light)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
*/
5
' 35. Ottawa St.
(Lansing Board of Hater and
Light}
Boiler 1
2
f,
3
4
5
*J
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
101* BTU
NU 2 yr~ COAL OIL SAS
50
50
SO
75
80.5
80.5
~386~ 39
13.9
13.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
— sr-f »«
PCFR
PCTA
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
14.61
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
-*-«•*- P^FR
100
100
100
100
100
TOO
100
S. coal
BOTTON AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
MAMW.IW OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. X tons/day Miles
HET
WET
HET
HET
HET
WET
HET
HET
HET
WET
HET
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
1954
195S
1961
1964
1968
1970
1939
1939
1949
1951
1951
80 <5
80
80
120
130
130
15 <5
15
20
20
20
des.p. coal
AREA TOTAL
467.5
16.76
-------
REFUSE COfflUSTIOH FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1977
STATE: MICHIGAN
SKSA-CQUNTY/PLAKT
Grand Rapids SMSA
20. Campbell
(Consumer Power Company)
Boiler 1
2
25. Wealthy Street
(Consumer Power Company)
33. J. De Young
(Holland Board of Public Works)
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
265
385
650
20
77.3
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
% yr
PCTA
58 2O3
26 0.64
30 2.42
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
too - -
des.p.coal
100
des.p.coal
56 - 44
des.coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. t
Dry E 89,9(t) 1962
Dry E 98. 1(t) 1966
* * *
* * *
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
515
750
25
100
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
mi 1 pe
Jil 1 I C j
28
< 5
91
C. \
AREA TOTAL
Muskegon-Huskegon Heights SMSA
1. Cobb.
{Consumer Power Company )
Bofler 1
2
3
4
5
No FPC-67 filed
747.3
66
66
66
156.25
156.25
5TO~ 73 34.98
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
100
100
100
100
100
]00
des.p.coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Drv
-
E
E
E
E
E
98
99
98
97
99
1948
1948
1950
1956
1957
190
190
190
455
455
-------
REFUSE COHajSTIOH FOR POWER GENERATION
TEAR: 1971
STATE: KICH1GW
* SHSA-COUKTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQNT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU *
1012BTU
Htf X & COAL OIL GAS
fttskegon-Muskegon Heights SHSA-Cont'd
32. Harbor Island
[Grand Haven Board of Hater
« Light) 20 68 1.55
AREA TOTAL
530. S
100
des.s.coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TOPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
miles
TYPE EFF. X tons/day
65
* No FPC 67 filed
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Michigan
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
SaglMw SMSA
WI Saglnaw River
(Consumer Power Co.)
Boiler 6
7
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
AREA TOTAL
Bay City SMSA
4. Weadock
(Consumer Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
f
JP 6
^r- _
06 8
RATED
CAPACITY
HW
J30
35
35
' 3.5
J
103.5
103.5
35
35
50
50
66
66
156.25
156.25
614.5
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQMT. OF
,, FIRING
ID" BTU
__? yr
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
10 1.33
1.33
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
PCTA
59 35.20
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100
100 -
100 -
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
des.p. coal
98 2
des.p. coal
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCES
miles
TYPE EFF. X tons/day
None _ 1928 -120 <5
None _ 1928 /
None _ 1928 25
None _ 1929 25
None _ 1929
None _ 1929
None _ 1930
None _ 1930
None _ 1930
None . 1930 /
MCAX 1940 85 <5
MCAX 1940 85
MCAX 1943 120
MCAX 1948 120
MCAX 1949 160
MCAX 1949 160
MCAX/E 1955 380
MCAX/E 1958 380
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION STATE^MICHIGAN
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Bay City - SMSA Cont'd
i. Karn
-- (Consumer Power Co)
•*- Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
Grand Traverse County
34. Bayslde Station
(Traverse City Light & Power
AREA TOTAL
Charlevoix County
19. Advance
(N. Michigan Electric Corp.)
AREA TOTAL
14. Presque Isle
(Upper Peninsula Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
£
A
*t
AREA TOTAL
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM ATP Dm nirtnu iurrf»i OFFIKF •«,„,....
CAPACITY FACTOR ROWT nc nuTDiRirrtnli I,... R POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
UVW.m FACTOR RQKT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
1012 BTU HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCES
« Jf vl
265
265
530 77 32.32
1144.5 fi? M
35 31 1.25
Dept.)
35 1 7C
41.8 64 2.98
41 .8 2.98
25
O? C
37.5
MM
.4
c^ o
57.8
174T7 71 12.07
174.7 12.07
r COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF %
PCTA 100 Dry E 70 1959
PCFR 100 - - Dry E 88 1961
HAC n r*(Ml
vie* • ft » wVQ J
89 11 - * * *
desvlcoal gas
100 - - * * 1953
des. p. coal
PCFR Dry MCTA/t 75/90 1955
PCTA wet MCTA/E 75/90 1952
PCTA wet MCTA/E 75/9'.! 1964
PCTA Wet MCTA/E 75/90 1966
des. p coal gas
miles
tons/ day
690 <5
690
50 <5
125 5
70 <5
110
160
170
* No FPC-67 filed
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Michigan
Kalamazoo SMSA
37 Borrow
(Consumer Power Co.)
Boiler 1
O
3
4
23. Kalamazoo
(Consumer Power Co.)
AREA TOTAL
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
35
35
50
66
~W~ 53
20 27
206
1012 BTU
TYPE
nc
OF
CURRENT FUEL
ni<:TDTnimnM
DISTRIBUTION
0.67
13-27
COAL
GAS
gig7
31 69
des. oil gas
100
des.p. coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
DRY
DRY
DRY
TYPE EFF. t
80
MCAX 80
MCAX 81
MCAX 81
1939
1939
1941
1949
tons/day
90
90
125
170
25
<5
<5
No FPC 67 filed
Branch County
30. Col-dwater . 11 i
(Board of Public Utilities) IUI
AREA TOTAL H.l
46
0.59
0.59
100
dess-. coal
25
< 5
-------
YEAR: mi
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION STATF-.MIrhin.n
SNSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Baraqa County
29. J.H. Warden
(Upper Peninsula Power Co. }
AREA TOTAL
Huron County
27. Harbor Beach - (Detroit
Edison)
AREA TOTAL
Calhoun County
22. Elm St.
(Consumer Power Co.)
Boiler 7
AREA TOTAL
RATED
CAPACITY
NU
18.8
18.A
121 _
121 .
30
30
LOAD ENERGY
FACTOR RQMT.
10^2 BTU
* v7~
68 1.46
1.4fi
19 2.12
.2.12
37 1.37
1.37
TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
FIRING BY BTU X HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
miles
COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. X tons/day
44 - 56 * ' * • * 60 <5
des.p. coal
PCFR 93 7 DRY E 99 1968 85 20
des'p coal oil
PCFR 100 DRY MCAX 80 1937 55 5
des.p. coal
*• No FPC 67 filed
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: MICHIGAN
SKSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT.
MM
BTU
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL ^FUSE TYPICAL
CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRAfJS.
TYPE EFF. X
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day HUes
Delta County
28. Escanaba
Upper Peninsula Power Co.
31. Gladstone
City of Gladstone
AREA TOTAL
23
29
61
1.59
1.81
100
des.s.coal
6.0 33 0.22 * 100 -
des.coal
65
10
* No FPC 67 filed
-------
MINNESOTA
ItGCND'
(•! flitf. ol lOO.OOO ni tt\aic inkJDil.inli.
i«m o! 60.000 10 100.000 inhibiting
O CrnKjl cili«s ol SMSA'i «ilh Ipwf Ihin bO.OOO .nhib'
O Piters ol J5.000 lo SO.OOO mhibiKnit oultidr SMSA't
Slinrivd MrlropolilAn
St*l
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED
CAPACITY
AREA MM
All Fossil Fuel Plants
Minneapolis-St. Paul SMSA 2048.8
Minnesota,
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
10^2 BTU
yr
106.8
1971 - Minneapolis-St. Paul SMSA
(a)
AREA REFUSE
POP. GENERATION _,
millions 106 tons 101Z BTU
yr yr
1.856 1.21 10.97
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b 35)
10.3
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
8.5
"Coal Plants" only**
Minneapolis-St. Paul SMSA 2018.8
106.1,
1.856
1.21
10.97
10.3
8.5
Includes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel).
* Does not differentiate between types of firing -- assumes all types capable of refuse burning
** Includes all plants in the Data Tables except 95.
-------
REFUSE COICUSTION FOR POWER GEHERAT ION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: MINNESOTA
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQKT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION K™NS
SKSA-COUNTY/PLANT 10« BTU "R1NG - 8Y BTU * ™™m OP^ON "CAPACITY" "STANCE
. . HH < yr COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. t tons/day MILES
MINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL SHSA
94. ISLAND
Northern States Power Co. 20 1 .02 - - TOO * * *
des. p. coal /gas
95. SOUTHEAST
Northern States Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
30 10 07?4^ - 29 71
des. oil/gas
96. KING
Northern States Power Co.
Boiler 1 5
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: MINNESOTA
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
HW % vr~
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF -COMBUSTION
HANDLING OPERATION -CAPACITY"
TYPE EFF. X tons/da>
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
MILES
HINNEAPOLIS-ST. PAUL SHSA (Cont'd.)
97.
HIGH BRIDGE
Northern States Power Co.
Boiler
13V
6-
80
80
80
80
35
60
60
113.6
163.2
46378"
58
26.50
RFRO/GFRO
RFRO/GFRO
RFRO/GFRO
RFRO/GFRO
RFRO/GFRO
RFRO/GFRO
RFRO/GFRO
RFRO/GFRO
PCFR/GFRO
PCFR/GFRO
PCFR/GFRO
PCFR/GFRO
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
E
E
E
E
-
-
-
-
. -
: -
-•
-
94(d)
94(d)
98 (d)
96.9(d)
1924
1924
1924
1924
1924
1924
1924
1924
1942
1944
1956
1959
190
190
190
190
86
145
145
275
395
10
38
60
des. p.coal/oil/gas
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: MINNESOTA
SMSA-CCUNTlf/HJWT
RATED
CAPACITY
LOAD
FACTOR
ENERGY
RQHT.
1QU tJTU
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL
GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE £FF> X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day
MILES
HIKHEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL SHSA (Conf d.)
98. RIVERSIDE
Northern States Power Co.
Boiler
U »
4 35
8 239.4
7 68.5
6 68.5
m
14
15
15
17
18
19
20
21
22 -
72
44OT 53
OSTO/GFRO
OSTO/GFRO
OSTO/GFRO
OSTO/GFRO
OSTO/Gfro
Cycl
PCFR/GFRO
PCFR/GFRO
GOPP/ROPP
GOPP/ROPP
GOPP/ROPP
GOPP/ROPP
GOPP/ROPP
&OPP/ROPP
GOPP/ROPP
GOPP/ROPP
GOPP/ROPP
GOPP/ROPP
Cycl 94(d) 1938 j 60
Cycl 94{d) 1938 '
Cycl 94{d
E 98 (d
E 98(d
E 98(d
None
None -
None
None -
None
None -
None
None
None -
None -
1938 80
550
155
155
1918
1918
1918
1918
1918 16S
1918
1918
1918
1918
1918
des. p. and s. coal /oil/gas
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:1971
STATE MINNESOTA
SM3A-COUHTY/PLANT
Minneapolis-St. Paul SMSA cont'd
99. Black Dog
Northern States Power Company
Boiler 1
2
3
4
RATED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
MW %
81
112.5
113.6
179. 5
45O" 53
ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
yr COAL OIL GAS
PCTA/GTAN
PCFR/GFRO
PCFR/GFRO
PCFR/GFRO
24.16 47 - 53
BOTTOM
ASH
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
TYPE
E
E
E
E
EFF. %
94
94
94
94
INITIAL
YEAR OF
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
OPERATION "CAPACITY"
1952
1954
1955
1960
tons/day
170
4465
6580
8840
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
10
des p. coal/gas
AREA TOTAL
2048.8
106.82
-------
5
J 00.000 o' "Ore <
• Pl*<« Of 50 COO 13 ICO.O'JO
O f »c« ol 2VOCO Ic 50 OOC
(^ *—j Su/-i*'d Mer-ooo -f
L. 1 SUf Jf.CJI KrtH SMS» i
ploMt» 23,1^,29,33,35
"frnttx C'fL
-'
CO
o -o I
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Missouri, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants
AREA
Columbia SMS A
(inc. Cole Co., Osage Co.,
Callaway.Co., Andrain Co.
Kansas City SMSA
St. Joseph SMSA
{Incl. Andrew Co. )
St. Louis SMSA
Springfield SMSA
Dunk! in County
Henry County
Jasper County
Livingston County
Rails County
Randolph County
Saline County
MISSOURI STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
) 218.7
2395.8
193.0
5096.3
253.0
34.5
563.1
212.8
15.0
34.0
447.0
30.5
9493.7
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
8,T
91.3
16.0
237.5
11.3
1.7
31.3
12.1
0.7
0.4
26.2
0.8
437.9
AREA
POP.
millions
0.195
1.283
0.100
2.398
0.156
0.034
0.019
0.081
0.016
0.008
0.023
0.025
4.338
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
10b Tons 1012 BTU
yr
0.12
0.84
0.06
1.57
0.10
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
2.84
yr
1.15
7.60
0.59
14.18
0.92
0.18
0.10
0.43
0.09
0.04
0.12
0.13
25.53
POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY SUPPLY TRANSPORTATION
FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
(a/b %) miles
14.0
8.3
3.7
6.0
8.1
10.3
0.3
3.5
11.5
9.3
0.5
15.1
5.8
27
8
5
16
< 5
10
10
10
5
10
10
10
-------
CQMKSTMK Wft
AREA
Columbia SMSA
(incl. Cole Co., Osage
Co., Call away Co.,
Andrain Co.)
Kansas City SMSA
St. Joseph SMSA
(Incl . Andrew Co.)
St. Louis SMSA
Springfield SMSA
Dunk! in County
Henry County
Jasper County
Livingston County
Rails County
Randolph County
Saline County
MISSOURI STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
187.0
2262.8
193.0
5041.3
253.0
-
563.1
212.8
15.0
34.0
447.0
30.5
9239-5
Mssoun, 1971 - "Coal Plants11 only*
(b) (a)
ENERGY AREA REFUSE
RQMT. POP. GENERATION
10'2 BTU millions 106 tons 1012 BTU
yr
6.3.
89.3
16.0
237.4
11.3
-
31.3
12.1
0.7
0.4
26.2
0.8
MM-
0.195
1.283
0.100
2.398
0.156
0.034
0.019
0.081
0.016
0.008
0.023
0.025
4.338
yr
0.12
0.84
0.06
1.57
0.10
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.00'
0.01
0.01
0.01
2.84
yr
1.15
7.6
0.59
14.18
0.92
0.18
0.10
0.43
0.09
0.04
0.12
0.13
25.53
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPf
FROM REFUSE
1 (a/b %)
18.0
8.5
3.7
6.0
8.1
-
0.3
3.5
11.5
9.3
0.5
15.1
6.9
TYPICAL
>LY TRANSPORTATION
[ DISTANCE
miles
27
8
5
16
<5
10
10
5
10
10
10
* Includes all plants In the Data Tables except 3, 20, 21, 29.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOP POWEP GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION
3£A-fogpy#LW
Kansas Ciiy SJ6A
1. Hawthorn
(Kansas City Power and Light)
Boiler 1
^
1 9
J Z
5
18. Sibley
(Missouri Public Service)
Boiler 1
2
3
22. R.J. Green
(Missouri Public Service Co.)
Boiler I
2
W %
69
69
112.5
142.8
514.8
(k/VQ \ »fc
908 . I 49
50
50
418.5
518.5 30
24-.S
25.0
"to 28
FIRING BY BTU X
10J2 BTU
vr COAL OIL GAS
PCTA/
f*TJfcll
GTAN
PCTA/
GTAN
PCTA/
GTAN
PCTA/
GTAN
PCTA/
GTAN
des.p. coal. gas
CYCL 100
CYCL 100
CYCL 100
14748 IUU
des.p. coal
GFRO
PCFR
1.73 1 : 99
des.-p.coal gas
MISSOURI
1971
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING
PRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
WEI
MET
WET
DRY
DRY
TYPE
MCAX
MCAX
HCAX
MCAX
E
HCAX
HCAX/E
MCAX
HCAX
EFF. %
85
85
NR/gg
NR/gg
NR
NR/gg
99
94
94
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUST I0« TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
1951
1951
1953
1955
1969
1960
1962
1969
1954
1958
tons/day
135
135
225
285
1030
55
55
495
35
35
miles
<$
22
25
-------
MISSOURI
TORRE COHBUSTIOK FOR HMER CEHEttKnOH
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT I0l2 BID FIRIHS • BY BTU *
MH J yr~ COAL OIL GAS
Kansas City SHSA cont'd
28. Grand Avenue
(Kansas City Power and Light)
Boiler 1 > GFRO/
RFRO
5 "AN/
OSTO
6 I GTAN/
}* PCTA
7 6TAH/
PCTA
8 J PCTA
126.8 14 2.26 37 63
des.
pxoal Q\\ gas
9. Missouri City (Chameron)
I (NW Electric Power Corp.) „„
Boiler l, 20 JH§
M 2 20
40 59 2.77 92 8
des. p.
coal oil
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
NONE
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
WET
MET
1971
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. %
NONE
CYCI/C
CYCI/C 99
CYCI/C 99
CYCI/C "
MCTA 52 (t)
MCTA 52 |t)
INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY' DISTANCE
tons/day Biles
1968 10
1930
1944
1950
1948
95
1953 55 20
1953 55
Conraon header system.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
Kansas Ctty SNSA cont'd
KS 99; .-Xawlttver
(Kansas 'City Board of
Boiler 1
2
3.
KS 98, Qulndaro No, 2*
MM *
Pub. Utilities)
46
50
65.3
IFTT 58
10.12 BTU
yr
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
GFRO/PCFR
GFRO/kFR
CYCL
9.54
ZZ - 78
des p. coal /gas
YEAR: 1971
STATE :NISSOI
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
Wet
Wet
Wet
TYPE
MCAX
MCAX
E
OFF. X
85
85
97
JRI
INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
Miles
tons/day
1955 115 5
1957 125
1962 165
(Kansas City Bd. of Pub. Ut titties)
Botler 17 1
18
19
20
21
22
GFRO/PCFR
60*
34.5
GFRO/PC FI
GFRO/PC
GFRO/PC
6RO/PC
GRO/Pt
I
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
None
None
None
None
MCAX
MCAX
_
'-
'-
85
85
1932 \ <5
1933 1
1938 >105
1942
1946 J
1952 60
29
63
des. p. coal/gas
m steam heatier
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
YEAR: 1971
STATE MISSOURI
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL YEAR OF
OPERATION
SHSA-COUNTY/PUUtT 10.12 BTU
*Tfc^% wvn i •/• bmi i iw o*u
m % W COAL OIL GAS
Kansas
KS 97.
26.
f»^^
City 5MSA confd
Qutndaro No. 3
Kansas City Board of Pub, Utilities
Boiler 1 81.6 CYCL
9 157.5 PCFR
555T 25 FTTtr 37 - 63
des p. coal/gas
Blue Valley
Independence City Power & Light
Boiler 1
2
a
Wet
Dry
Wet
Wet
Wet
TYPE-. EFF. X
E 98 1966
E 99.35 1971
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
Miles
tons/day
95
190
ff
9ni;
T2T
40
10 - 90
des. coal/oil/gas
-------
RATED
CAPACITY
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Kansas City SHSA cont'd
29. Northeast
(Kansas City Power and Llghl
BQfler ? S
10
12
13
14
15
16
J
AREA TOTAL
t)
> Common
' Steam
Header
133
2335.8
Henry County
2. Monirose
(Kansas City Power and Light)
Boiler 1 187.5
2 187; 5
3 188.1
563.1
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POMER GENERATION
LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
FACTOR RQNT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU t
10'* BTU
* yr COAL OIL GAS
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
WTRO/'
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
GFRO
10 1.94 - 2 98
des. oil gas
91.30
PCTA 100
PCTA inn
PCTA 100
58 31.34 100
des. p. coal
MISSOURI
1971
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. Jt
None. Nor*. - 1922
1929
1929
1923
* - 1937
1923
1950
CRY E S5 1958
DRY E 93.5 1960
DRY E 99.5 1964
REFUSE TYpIc.
COMBUSTION TRANS
"CAPACITY" DISTW
tons/dav m* !**«•
Yes <5
85
435 jo
435
440 Kansas C1t
AREA TOTAL
563.1
31.34
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE-HISSOURI
SMSA-COUNTY/PUWT
RATED
CAPACITY
HW
LOAD ENERGY
FACTOR RQKT.
10*2 BTU
__* JEI
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU «
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" pISTANCE
Miles
TYPE EFF. * tons/day
60.5*
90
T3O
t, Joseph SHSA •• Andett Co.
14. Lake Road
(Str Joseph Light & Power Co)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
30. EdooRd Street
(St. Joseph Lgt. & Power Co)
Boiler 16
17
18
20
19
* Header system)boilers not directly associated
AREA TOTAL 193.0
T379f
42,5*
25 TTTJ
16.07
GFRO/RFRO
GFRO/RFRO
GFRO/RFRO
GFRO/RFRfl/PCFR
6FRO/(^Rfl/PCFR
GFRO/CTC£
8
des coal/clVgas
Dry None 1961
Dry None 1961
Dry None 1938
Dry HCAX 85(d) 1950
Dry KCAX S5.7 (d) 1957
Dry HCAX 70fd) 1967
5 95
des caal/oil/g«s
<5
590
SPRE/RFRO/GFRO
SPRE/RF^fGFRO
ROPP/GFSO^
RFRO/GFRO
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA
MCTA
None
None
None
93
93
1950
1950
1955
1962
1957
<5
85
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD
ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
SHSA-COUKTY/PIANT
Randolph County
17. Thomas Hill
(Assoc. Electric Corp.)
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
Saline County
19. Marshall
(Marshall Municipal Utility)
AREA TOTAL
m i
175
272
44? 68
447.0
30.5 27
30.5
FIRING BY BTU t
10™ BTU
yr COAL OIL GAS
CYCL 100
CYCL 100
26.2$ 100 -
des, coal
26,29
0.86 6-94
des.
coal oil gas
0.86
MISSOURI
1971
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION. "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. X tons/day m11es
DRY E 96.5 1966 435 'O
DRY E 95.3 1966 680
Columbia 50
* ' •« '°
* * * 03
Columbia 50
Kansas City 75
* No FPC-67 Filed.
-------
^
s^
SNSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Livingston County
23. ChllHcothe
(ChllHcothe Municipal Utll.)
AREA TOTAL
Rails County
27. Hannibal
(Hannibal Board of Public Works)
AREA TOTAL
St. Louis SMSA
4* Hersuncc
(Union Electric)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
111.29. Baldwin, Illinois
(Illinois Power Company)
Boiler 1
RATED
CAPACITY
MU
15
15.0
34
34.0
137.5
137.5
289
359
923
623.1
'623.1
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1Q12 BTU
X 7T
50 0.78
0.76
12 0.+3
0.43
PCTA
PCTA
PCFR
PCFR
58 48.1*
CYtt
62 33. tt
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU t
COAL OIL GAS
100 -
des. s. coal
85 -15
des. p. coal
92-8
des. p. coal gas
100
100
des. coal
MISSOURI
1971
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY-
TYPE EFF. 1 tons/day
JTYPICAL
TRANS.
(DISTANCE
miles
* * * 30 5
St Joseph 60
Kansas City 70
* * • * \s I0
St Louis 95
DRY E 98 1953 305 IO
DRY E 98/83 (d) 1954 305
DRY E 98 1959 645
ORY E 98 1961 800
WET E 97 1970 1405 *5
• HO FK-47
-------
SH3A-COUNTY/PLANT
* t
St. Louis SMSA cont'd
ILL23. Wood River, Illinois
(Illinois Power Company)
Boiler 1 1
!."•)
4 .
5.
5. Sioux
(Union Electric)
Boiler 1
2
15. Labadie
CUnion Electric)
Boiler 1
2
REFUSE
COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
10'2 BTU
HU X vr COAL OIL GAS
150
113.1
: 387
S5071 70
549.8
549.8
1099.6 49
620.5
555
11?5.S 40
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
'.'•-• PCTA
40.68
' CYCL
CYCL
5OB"
PCTA
PCTA
38.79
76 24
des. p. coal gas
100
100
100
des. p. coal
100
100
100 — ~
des. p. coal
YEAR- '971
STATE: MISSOURI
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. X
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Wet
Wet
Dry
Dry
Grav
Grav
Grav
C
C
E
E
E
E
15 \
15 T
15 J
99.3(t)
•99;1 (t)
98
98
'
99
99
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1949-
1950
1954
1964
1967
1968
1970 -
1971 .
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
1 3ST5
300
1025
1035
1035
940
840
32. Ashley
(Union Electric Co.)
70*
1.45
PCFR
83
17 Dry
95
1940-1949
25
* Boiljers2,3,4,5,6: common steam header. All five boilers similarly equipped.
15
15
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR PCTgR GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: MISSOURI
RATED
CAPACITY
LOAD
FACTOR
SNSA-COUNTY/PLANT
ENERGY
RQHT.
1012 BTU
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
yr
COAL OIL
GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF.
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE . tTYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY", DISTANCE
tons/day Miles
ST. LOUIS SKSA-conf d
111133. Cahokia
(Union Electric)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
^-. 13
_i 14
— 15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
300*
16
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
Dry
Dry
Dry
.Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- •
-
-
-
•-
-"
-
-
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
-
• -
-
-
-
"-
-
-
-
-
- ,
-
-
-
-
-
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
95
1923
1923
1923
1923
1923
1923
1923
1923
1924
1924
1924
1924
1925
1925
1925
1927
1927
1927
1937
1937
1937
1937
1937
1937
des.p-coal/oll
100
180
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
*
YEAR: 197i
STATE: MISSOURI
SMSA-tOUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
>W X vr~ COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE ; TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF' COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. t
tons/day Miles
ST. LOUIS SHSA-cont'd
35.
22
«» .
0.44
100
des.s-coal
15
30
IH 25. Venice, Illinois
(Union Electric Company)
Venice *1
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
conroon
steam
header
55 0.9
"OB"
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
'None
None
None
None
None
None
1960
1960
1960
1960
1960
1925
1925
1925
1925
1925
1929
<5
des. oil/gas
100
* NoFPC-67 filed
**A11 boilers;-front-fired
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
1971
STATE: MISSOURI
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
BTU
TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM
OF DISTRIBUTION ASH
FIRING. BY BTU X HANDLING
COAL OIL 6AS
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL
REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. X
tons/day
ST. LOUIS SMSA-cont'd
Miles
III, 25. Venice, Illlnols-cont'd
(Union Electric Company)
Venice *2
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
.AREA TOTAL
: connoa
steam
header
500 45 •
5096.3
~ZO8
237.5
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
Top-
fired
Top-
fired
67 - 33
des.p.coal gas
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry •
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
96
96
96
96.
96
96
96
96
1942
1942
1943
1943
1948
1948
1950
1950
<5
1125
-------
MISSOURI
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION 1971
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Columbia SMSA-Callaway County. Cole
Osage County
7. Chamois
(Central Electric Power Corp.
20. Jefferson City
(Missouri Power and Light)
21 Mexico
(Missouri Power and Light)
24. Columbia
(Columbia Water and Light)
25. Fulton
(Fulton Dept. of Utilities)
AREA TOTAL
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
County,
) 67.7
12.7
19
107.8
11.5
218.7
LOAD ENERGY
FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
X W~
64 4.29
3 0.04
88 1.76
15 1-70
34 0.4
8.19
TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
FIRING BY BTU X HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. X tons/day miles
.
* 100 * * * 1954 180 35
des. p. coal
-. - 100 * * - 25
des. gas
* . . 10Q * * 70 30
des. gas
"7rt J C
* 100 - * 70
-------
KRBE COKBUSUOH ftm KMJR SLHERKUOH
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Dunklln County
3. Jim Hill
(Ark. -Miss. Powwr Co.)
AREA TOTAL
Springfield SMSA
8. Janes River
(Springfield City Util.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
AREA TOTAL
Jasper County
6. Asbury
(Empire District Electricals)
Boiler 1
AREA TOTAL
RATED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
NH %
34.5 48
34J5
22
22
44
60
105
253 44
253.0
212.8 63
212.8
ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
W COAL OIL GAS
*
1.74 5 95
des . o1 1 gas
1.74
GTAN/
PCTA7
GFRO/
PCFR
GFRO/
PCFR
GFRO/
PCFR
TOT 9 - SI
des. coal gas
11.32
12.15 CYCL 100
des. coal oil
12.15
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. X tons/day miles
"•
* * * 1950 70 IO
Poplar Bluff 20
DRY CYCL 88 1952 40 <5
DRY CYCL 88 1957 40
DRY CYCL 87 1960 80
DRY CYCL 87 1964 110
DRY E 98 1970 , 200
C1C tO
HET E 92 1970 . 515 '
Sprfngffeld 80
* Ho FPC-67 Filed.
-------
LEGEND
® Places of 100.000 o<- "-are i-habitants
• Places of 50.000 to 100,000 .inhabitants
O Places of 25.000 to 50.000 inhabitants outside SMSA's
Standard V
O Q**iv
"KlEFOSe
O Kl 10 » «0 SO MILES
(SMSA's)
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POUER GENERATION
'Nebraska, 1971:-.Omaha SMSA
AREA
(b) (a)
RATED ENERGY AREA REFUSE
CAPACITY RQMT. POP. f GENERATION
MW 1012 BJU millions IP6 tons 10^2 BTU
yr yr yr
POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
(a/b %) miles
All Fossil Fuel Plants
Omaha SMSA
794.2
39.23
.552
.362
3.264
8.3
•vj
•-J
"Coal Plants" only**
Omaha SMSA
774.2
38.93
.552
.362
3.264
8.4
Includes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel). Includes all plants in attached
data sheets
* Does not differentiate between types of firing—assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
** Includes all plants in the Data Tables except 98.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: NEBRASKA
SMSA-COUNTY/P1ANT
OMAHA SHSA
99. North Omaha
Omaha Public Power District
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
RATED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
MM %
73.5
108.8
108.8
136.0
217.6
ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL
FIRING BY BTU X HANDLING
1012 BTU
yr COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. X
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCFR
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
U O (JUI UJ
36
96
96
96
98.8
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1354
1957
1959 .
1963
1968
REFUSt TYPICAL
-COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/dey Miles
165 5
245
245
305
490
98.
97.
South Omaha
Omaha Public Power District
Jones Street Station
Omaha Public Power District
Boiler 20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
AREA TOTAL
20
61
14
38723"
0.3
43- 57
des.p.coal/gas
17 - 83
des. oil/gas
65**
25
34.5
49
T7375"
794.2
"OTTO
39.23
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
44-56
des. s»p. coal /gas
* No FPC-67 filed.
** header system
10
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
None
None
None
None
None
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
-
-
-
-
-
65
85
85
1920
1923
1923
1925
1929
1937
1949
1951
20
5
5
10
-I
-------
NEW HAMPSHIRE
LEGEND
ol 50,000 to 100,000 inhibit ml*
Q Central cities ol SMSA'i with fewer than 50.000 inhabitants
O Places ol 25,000 to 50.000 inhabitants outside SMSA't
Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSA's)
*• mil
• MANCWStTt »OC«IN
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
New Hampshire, 1971 - "Coal Plants" only
(b) (a) POTENTIAL TYPICAL
RATED ENERGY AREA REFUSE ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
AREA CAPACITY RQMT. POP. GENERATION FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
MW 1012 BTU millions 106 tons 10'2 BTU (a/b %) miles
Manchester SMSA
(includes Rockingham Co.) 638.0 36.3 0.371 0.24 2.19 6.0
Includes all plants capable*of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel). Includes all plants in
attached data sheets.
H"
O3
0 * Does not differentiate between types of firing — assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION . . . . , . . ,, a. oo
New Hampshire, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants " Identlcal to table above-
Note: Data includes Merrimack and Schiller Plants only.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR TOMER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Ne* Hampshire
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
. MW X yr~
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. X
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
Miles
tons/day
Manchester SMSA
Rocklnghan Co.
. 98. Merrlnaclc
Public Service Co. of New Hanpshlre
Boiler 1
2
113.6
345.6
415T
61
2O1
CYCL
CYCL
100
100
Wet
Wet
TOO -
des coal/oil
E
£
77 A
92.4
1960
1968
250
760
10
97. Schiller
Public Service Co.of New Hampshire
Boiler 1
5
6
J
28.8
50
50
50
T7O"
68
12.44
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
100
100
100
100
100
1968
'968
1952
145
145
- 100
des coal/oil
AREA TOTAL
638.0
36.35
-------
NEW JERSEY
LEGEND
Pl»c«l ol 100000 or mm« i
M.OflO lo 100.000 mh
O Cenl'»l cilics ol SMSA's «>lh l(wt« Ihjn bO.OOO inhdD'Kn'%
O Pi*c«s ol 25.000 lo 50.000 mhibilanli oulsuJe SMSA'i
SUndird
l Af««s (SMSA it
182
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
AREA
Atlantic City SMSA
Newark SMSA
(incl. Middlesex County)
Patterson-Clifton-Passaic SMSA
Trenton SMSA
Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton
SMSA
NEW JERSEY TOTALS
New Jersey, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants
(b) (a)
RATED ENERGY AREA REFUSE
CAPACITY RQMT. POP. f GENERATION 19
MW 1012 BTU millions 10 6 tons 10 '^ BTU
351.7
3977.4
650.4
652.8
82.0
5714.3
yr
21.1
204.6
27.9
32.0 .
3.8.
289.6
0.177
2.491
1.394
0.314
0.125
4.501
yr
0.11
1.64
0.91
0.20
0.08
2.96
yr
1.05
14.73
8.24
1.86
0.74
26.62
POTENTIAL Typ1ci;
ENERGY SUPPLY jrans
FROM REFUSE D1stan(
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
New Jersey, 1971 - "Coal Plants" Only
(b)
RATED ENERGY
CAPACITY RQMT.
AREA MW ml"8™
10 yr
Atlantic City SMSA 351.7 21.1
Newark SMSA
(incl. Middlesex County) 3458.0 178.8
Patterson-Cl i f ton-Passaic
SMSA 650.4 27.9
Trenton SMSA 652.8 32.0
Vineland-Millville-
Bridgeton SMSA 82.0 3.8
NEW JERSEY STATE TOTALS 5194.9 263.8
(a) POTENTIAL Typical
AREA REFUSE ENERGY SUPPLY Trans.
POP. GENERATION FROM REFUSE Distar.ce
millions ,_ tons .„ BTU (a/b %) miles
100 yr lO'*- yr
0.177 0.11 1.05 5.0
2.491 1.64 14.73 8.2
1.394 0.91 8.24 29.5
0.314 0.20 1.86 5.8
0.125 0.82 0.74 19.1
4.501 2.96 26.62 10.1
8
<5
5
<5
<5
Includes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel). Includes all plants in
attached data sheets except No. 16.
* Does not differentiate between types of firing — assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
New Jersey
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
'Typical
trans
Distance
miles
Newark SHSA-Hiddlesex County
9. Hudson
Public Service Electric ft Gas
Boiler 1
2
11. Marlon
Public Service Electric ft Gas
Boiler 51
52
8. Essex
Public Service Electdc ft Gas
Boiler 1
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
454.8
659.7
1114.5
62.5
62.5
T2T
47
4TOT
CYCL
PCOP
RFRO
42
38 ^40
des.p. coal
oil
100
100
22
gas
Wet
Dry
97.6
98
E
E
95(d|
95(d)
100
des.p.coal
oil
13ST8"
36
TTToT
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
93(d)
E
E
90(d
90
(d)
(d)
- 97
des.p.coal
oil
1964
1968
780
1135
<5
1941
1941
135
135
<5
V
1947
1923
1923
1924
1924
1924
1924
1924
1924
1938
1938
<5
7?5
gas
-------
00
NewarK SMSA-Middlesex County cont'd
10. Kearny "B"*
Public Service Electric & Gas
Boiler 1
2
16. Linden
Public Service Electric & Gas
Boiler 11
12
13
2
12. Sewaren
Public Service Electric & Gas
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
RATED
CAPACITY
HW
157
157
598.6
259.7
259.7
259.7
259.7
51974
103
107
103
119
388
820
REFUSE COHBUSTICN FOB POUFP
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQMT. OF
,, FIRING
1012 BTU
X ^F~
RTAN
RTAN
**S\ 33.48
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
47 55773"
RTAN
RTAN
RTAN
RTAN
RFRO
58 407
YEAR' 1071
GENERATION 5TAT£. JJ, ',.,,.,.„,,
DISTRIRlirrrm BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE
BY BTU t £?!L TU«. CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION Typical
BT BIU l HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" Irans-
Distance
COAL OIL GAS rvpr rrr « trirl , . Mi1p«;
— — =2= . i irt err. % tons/day
100 - C 97(d) 1953 305 <5
100 - C 97(d) low ^5
100
des.p.coal
oil
100 - ... 1957 385
100 - - - 1957 385
100 ... 1957 385
100 - - - 1957 .iftR
100
des oil
C 95 d 1948 240 xs
C 95 d 1948 250 N
C 95 d 1949 240
C 97 d 1949 275
1962 905
97 3
des.p.coal
oil gas
* Total Rated Capacity figure (598.6) uprated from 314.1MW during the period 1971-73 because boilers 41-43 and 51-53 from Kearny "A"
prior to retirement in 1973. Boilers 11-13, 21-23, 31-33 from Kearny "A" were retired in 1971. Each boiler from Kearny "A" was an
* _DurJ1'in9 oil, with no operable ash handling or pollution control equipment, and all were constructed during the period 1925-28.
* State average IK. »
have been included
RFRO" boiler
-------
REFUSE COfCUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: New Jersey
£
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Newark SMSA-Middlesex County (cont'd)
4. Werner
Jersey Central Power & Light
Boiler 1
2
. 3
4
RATED
CAPACITY
MU
J56.25
60
116.25
LOAD ENERGY
FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
54 O3~
TYPE
OF
FIRING
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
CYCL/
RFRO
BY BTU X
COAL OIL 6AS
100
100
100
100
100
des.coal
oil
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. X
1930
1930
1930
E 86.7(t) 1953
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/ day
| 140
150
Typical
, Trans.
; Distance
<5
3. Sayrevllle
Jersey Central Power & Light
Boiler 2
3
5
6
7
RFRO
RFRO
top-
fired
top-
fired
PCFR,
CYCL,
RFRO,
GFRO
PCFR,
CYCL,
RFRO.
GFRO
Wet HCTA 89
Met HCTA 88
Wet E 95
Met
90
1930
1930
1942
1949
1955
1958
<5
69
~ 8T^
des.s.p coal
oil
18
gas
980
AREA TOTAL
3977.35
204.61
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
New Jersey
SMSArCOUNTY/PWNT
ft*1 .^*4 - /» J4... CUC ft
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
LOAD
FACTOR
*
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
vr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF.
t
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE !
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
Typical
Trans.
Distance
miles
1. England
Atlantic City Electric Co.
Boiler 1
2
19. Missouri Avenue
Atlantic City Electric Co.
Boiler 6
7
136
163.2
299.2
70
TT&
CYCL
CYCL
Wet
Wet
93.5
94
1962
1964
340
410
26.25
26.25
~5T7T 63
TM
PCFR
PCFR
92 . 8,
des.p.coal
oil
100
100
100
des.p.coal
Dry
Dry
87.8
81.4
1941
1946
70
70
AREA TOTAL
351.7 21.17
00
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: New Jersey
-.
SMSA-COUnTY/PLANT
Vlneland SMSA
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
2. Vlneland 82
Vlneland Electric Department
Boiler Information not available
AREA TOTAL 82
Trenton SHSA
15. Mercer
Public Service Electric 4 Gas
Boiler 1
2
326.4
326.4
5§O
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
% w
35 3.88
3.88
PCFR
PCFR
60 3O?
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
21 79
des.s.coal
91 9
des.p.coal gas
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASK CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. 9!
* 4 *
Wet C 95.5
Wet C 90.3
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1900
1960
1961
REFUSE Typical
COMBUSTION Irane
"CAPACITY" BSSnce
• .. Miles
tons/day
160 <5
675 <5
675
ARfA TOTAL
HOTES
652.8
3Z.02
Electric Company) * 7-BurHngto, (PubHc Service Electric » Gas, plants Eluded 1n Philadelphia SHSA. Pennsylvania.
2. 17-Deepwater (Atlantic City Electric Company) plant Included 1n Wilmington SMSA. Delaware.
3. N.J. Plants 5 and 13 . . "lauded 1n Allentown-Bethlehen-Eastern SMSA, Pennsylvania.
*lto FPC-67 filed
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER 6ENERATIOH
YEAR: 1971
STATE: New Jersey
SMSA-COUHTY/PyWT
Patei
6.
r^on-CHfton-Passalc SHSA
Bergen
Public Service Electric & Gas
Boiler 1
RATED
CAPACITY
HW
325.2
325.2
650.4
LOAD
FACTOR
X
51
ENERGY TYPE
RQHT. OF
FIRING
W
PCFR
PCFR
27.g"4
CURRENT FUEi
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU t
COAL OIL GAS
60 27 13
des.p.coal gas
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
Met
Met
AIR
POLLI/TION
CONTROL
TYPE
C
C
EFF. «
96.5
94.7
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1959
1960
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY
tons/day
590
590
H
Typical
Trans.
Distance
miles '
JO
O
AREA TOTAL
650.4
27.94
-------
ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY
,£) Placet ol 100000 Of mo'e Thabilarts
• Places ol W.OOO !o 100000 inhaD.lanls
0 Places ol 25.000 to bO.OOO inhabitants outside SMSA s
f^ "—I Slan.H'0 M-t'JDv-
I I SM- t. - i-e»« !'
SMSA s
a
ja
;'
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
VO
NJ
New York, 1971 - AT
AREA
Albainy-Sc.hefleQta.dy-T.rQy, SMSA
Binghamton SMSA
(incl . Chenango County)
Buffalo SMSA
(incl . Chautauqua County)
New York SMSA
(incl. Orange County)
Rochester SMSA
Steuben-Chemung Counties
Syracuse SMSA
Tompkins County
Yates County
NEW YORK TOTAL
RATED
CAPACITY
m
400
205.8
1536.5
11499.1
458.8
70.0
376
270
160
14976.2
(b)
ENERGY
ROW-
1012 BTU
yr
24.9
13.2
70.0
518.9
24.9
8.7
19.9
18.4
10.8
710.0
1 Fossil Fuel
AREA
POP.
millions
0.734
0.355
1.518
11.961
0.906
0.205
0.647
0.078
0.020
16.424
Plants
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
10 6 tons 1012 BTU
yr
0.48
0.23
0.99
7.85
0.59
0.12
0.42
0.04
0.01
10.77
yr
4.34
2.10
8.97
70.72
5.36
1.10
3.83
0.41
0.11
96.94
POTENTIAL Typical
ENERGY SUPPLY frans
FROM REFUSE Distance
(a/bJS) miies
17.3
15.9
12.8
13.6
21.4
12.6
19.2
2.2
1.0
13.6
<5
8
25
11
< 5
8
30
11
10
Includes all plants detailed in attached data sheets.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
New York, 1971 - "Coal Plants" Only
AREA
Albany-Schenectady-Troy SMSA
Blnghamtom SMSA
(Incl . Chanago County)
Buffalo SMSA
(incl. Chautauqua County)
New York SMSA
(incl. Orange County)
Rochester SMSA
Steuben-Chemung Counties
Syracuse SMSA
Tompkins County
Yates County
NEW YORK TOTAL
RATED
CAPACITY
MU
400
205.8
1536.5
6657.4
458.8
70.0
376
270
160
10134.5
(b)
ENERGY
SB-»™
yr
24.9
13.2
70.0
312.8.
24.9
8.7
19.9
18.4
10.8
503.9
AREA
POP.
millions
0.734
0.355
1.518
11.961
0.906
0.205
0.647
0.078
0.020
16.424
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
1016 tons 1012 BTU
yr
0.48
0.23
0.99
7.85
0.59
0.12
0.42
0.04
0.01
10.77
yr
4.34
2.10
8.97
70.72
5.36
1.10
3.83
0.41
0.11
96.94
POTENTIAL Typical
ENERGY SUPPLY Trans.
FROM REFUSE Distance
(a/b %) miles
17.3
15.9
12.8
22.6
21.4
12.6
19.2
2.2
1.0
19.2
<5
8
25
1 1 .v
<5
8
30
11
10
Includes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel). Includes all plants in
attached data sheets except Nos. 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14, 29 and 30 (New York City area).
* Does not differentiate between types of firing — assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
-------
REFUSE -COMBUSTIOH FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: NEW YORK
RATED
CAPACITY
LOAD
FACTOR
SMSA-COUKTY/PLANT
ENERGY
RQHT.
1012*TU
yr
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU I
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOH AIR POLLUTION INITIAL . REFUSE
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY"
TYPE EFF. % tons/day
• Typical
Trans
Distance
miles
JJinghamptonJiHSA
Chenango County
16. Goudey
New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
Boiler 8
9
10
11
12
13
19. Jennison
New York State Electric I Gas Corp.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
15
15
15
15
58 O7
62 779?
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCOP
PCOP -
PCTA
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
des.p.coal
100
100
100
100
Too
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
E
E
E
E
E
E
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
90
90
90
85
85
75.7
86
86
86
86
des.s.coal
1927
1927
1927
1943
1943
1951
1945
1945
1950
1950
<5
20
20
20
50
50
140
50
50
50
50
22
AREA TOTAL
205.8
J3.21
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
NEW YORK
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
SMSA-CWJNTY/PLANT
BTU
HU
TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM
OF DISTRIBUTION ASH
FIRING BY BTU X HANDLING
COAL OIL GAS
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE ; Typical
CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION Trans
OPERATION "CAPACITY" Distance
miles
TYPE EFF. X tons/day
Syracuse SMSA
23. Oswego
Niagara Mohawk Power Cocapany
Boiler 1
2
3
4
92
92
92
55 TO4"
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
Wet MCTA 86
Wet MCTA 86
Wet MCYA 88
Wet MCAX 89
1940 205
1941 205
1948 205
1951 225
30
TOO-
des.p.coal
AREA TOTAL
376
19.94
Buffalo SMSA
Chautauqua County
22. Dunkirk
Niagara Mohawk Power Coapaqy
Boiler 1
2
3
4
96
96
218
218
54 2735*
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
100
des.p.coal
MCAX 85.6
MCAX 80
C 95.1
C 95.5
1950
1950
1959
1960
185
185
420
420
45
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
NEW YORK
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED .
CAPACITY
m
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
vr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. I
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE .
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
Typical
Trans
Distance
miles
Buffalo SHSA cont'd
Chautauqua County
26. Huntley
Niagara Mohawk Power Company
Boiler 63
64
65
66
67
68
92
100
100
100
218
218
828
3. Carlson
Jamestown Board of Public Utilities
Boiler 1
2
3
4 23
5 25
~80T5
53 3OB"
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
PCTA
100
100
100
100
100
100
I'M
des.
-
p. coal
Wet
Wet
Met
Wet
Dry
Dry
C
C
C
C
C
C
93-95
93-95
93-95
93-95
93-95
93-95
1942
1948
1953
1954
1957
1958
180
195
195
195
430
430
AREA TOTAL
1536.5
34 3TT9"
70.01
100
100
100
100
100
TOO -
des.p.coal
60
35
40
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: NZW YORK
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
MM
BTU
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE Typical
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION Trans
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" Distance
COAL OIL
GAS
TYPE EFF. X
t
/da
miles
Albany-Schenectady-Troy SMSA
21. Albany
Niagara Mohawk Power Company
Boiler 1
2
3
4
100
100
100
71
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
100
100
100
100
TOO"
des.p.coal
oil
<5
Dry MCAX 75
Dry MCAX 75
Dry MCAX 75
Dry MCAX 75
1952 260
1952 260
1953 260
1954 260
AREA TOTAL
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POUER GENERATION
YEAR: 197i
STATE: NEW YORK
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Yates County
17. Greenidge
New "York" State Electric & Gas
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
RATED
CAPACITY
KM
Corp.
10
10
20
20
20
80
T60
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
X yr
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
69 TO?
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
des.p.coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. X
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
CYCL
CYCL
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
E
75
75
75
75
75
85
1938
1938
1943
1950
1950
1953
REFUSE Typical
COMBUSTION Trans
"CAPACITY" Distance
., miles
tons/day
10
25
25
55
55
55
230
Rochester 45
FlmirA TR
AREA TOTAL
206.2
10.84
Khester SMSA
2. Rochester 3
Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
7
8
12
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
20.8
81.6
64
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
98 2
des.p.coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
75-80
84-86
75-80
85-90
82-86
90-91
93-96
1936
1937
1938
1940
1947
1942
1959
55
55
55
55
55
55
230
<5
00
-------
YEAR: 1971
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Rochester SMSA cont'd
2.
Rochester 7
Rochester Gas & Electric Corp.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
RATED
CAPACITY
HH
46
62.5
62.5
81.6
212T6
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQKT. OF
FIRING
10*2 BTU
» yr
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
64 TO8
•
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
COAL
99
des.p
OIL GAS
1
.coal
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
STATE: NEW YORK
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE EFF. X
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
E
E
97.5
97.5
97.5
97.5
1949
1951
1953
1957
REFUSE
•COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
130
175
175
230
Typical
Trans
Distance
miles
<5
AREA TOTAL
458.8
24.98
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
NEW YORK
RATED
CAPACITY
LOAD
FACTOR
ENERGY
RQHT.
SMSA-COUttTY/PLAHT
BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
Typical
Trans .
Distance
miles
COAL OIL
GAS
TYPE EFF. *
tons/day
Tompklns County
20. Nrillten
New tor* State ETectrlc ft Gas Corp.
Boiler 1
2
135
135
81 TOT
PCTA
PCTA
100
100
Wet
Wet
84
86
1955
1958
380
380
]00
des.p.coal
11
Syracuse 35
Binghamton 45
AREA TOTAL
270
18.47
Steuben County-Cheroung County
18. Hickllna
New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
15
15
20
20
~70
96
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
100
100
100
100
TOO -
des.s.coal
Wet MCAX 86 1948 75
Wet MCAX 86 1948 75
Wet MCAX 86 1952 105
Wet MCAX 86 1952 105
Binghamton 55
Rochester 80
AREA TOTAL
70
8.70
0
-------
RFFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:l971
STATE: NEW YORK
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL «Fg . Tjpjc.1
CAPACITY FACTOR ROHT. OF^ t™*™"™ JJ"^ CONTR°L SlON "CAPACITY" Distance
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
New York SMSA
orange uounty
T27 bar Kockaway
(Long Island Lighting Co.)
Boiler 4
13. Glenwood
(Long Island Lighting)
Boiler 1
A
9 3
4
6
40
50
MM
113.6
30
30
30
30
30
30
100
100
380.3
t 10 fr COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF- 1 tons/day
RTAN*
58 6.10 GTAN- . 85 15 • ,nco 26°
PCTA DRY C N.R. 1953
des.p. coal oil gas
RFRO 15
GFRO DRY E N.R. 1928 55
RFRO
GFRO DRY E N.R. 1928 55
RFRO
GFRO DRY C N.R. 1930 55
RFRO
GFRO DRY C N.R. 1930 55
Top
Fired DRY None N.R. 1942 55
PCTA
GTAN
WAN DRY None N.R. 1946 55
PCTA
RTAN
GTA! DRY C .N.R. 1952 190
PCTA
RTAN
CTAN DRY C N.R. 1954 190
40 17.24 - , 75 25
des.p. coal oil gas
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
New York SMSA Oranae County cont'd
t5. t&A Jefferson
(Long Island Lighting Co.)
Boiler 10
20
30
40
30. 59th Street
(Con Edison)
Boiler 111
112
113
no
114
115
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
46
46
187.5
187.5
~46T~
30.5
30.5
30.5
58
\
l
184.5
LOAD ENERGY TYPE ' CURRENT FUEL
FACTOR RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
1012 BTU
1 W COAL OIL UAS
PCTA
RTAN
PCTA
' RTAN
PCTA
RTAN
PCTA
RTAN
67 28.31 - 100
des.p. coal oil
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RTAN
RTAN
36 5.86 - 100
des. oil
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
None
None
None
None
Hone
None
YEAR: 1971
STATE: NEW
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. *
C/MCTA NR
C/MCTA N3
C/MCTA NR
C/MCTA NR
None
None
None
None
None
None
YORK
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1948
1950
1958
1960
1962
1962
1952
1962
1967 \
1967 J
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
115
115
480
480
65
65
65
125
7t>
Typical
Trans
Distance
miles
44
<5
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
New
York SMSA Orange
27. Danskanner
(Central Hudson
Boiler 1
2
3
»*
4
1. Lovett
NU
County cont'd
Gas & Elec.)
72.7
74.2
148.5
242.0
537.4
FIRING
1012 BTU
X W
GENERATION
• CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM
DISTRIBUTION ASH
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
PCTA
PCTA/GTAN
PCTA
PCTA
63 35H9"
12 84 4
des p. coal oil gas
YEAR: 1971
STATE: NEW YORK
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
^CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
TYPE
E
E
E
E
OPERATION
EFF. X
98
98
98
98
-
1951
1954
1959
1967
REFUSE : Typical
COMBUSTION T*Jns.
"CAPACITY" Distance
tons/day
170
175
350
575
(Orange & Rockland Utilities)
P
b
Boiler 1
2
3
4
c
w
23
23
69
179.5
200.6
PCFR,
RFRO
GFRO
PCFR, RFRO
GRRP
PCTA,
GTAN
PCFR,
GFRO
PCFR.
63 2O6" GPRO
RTAN
RFRO
RFRO
64 36
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
E
E
85
85
85
92
92
1949
1951
1955
1966
1969
55
55
170
445
500
Miles
50
40
des. p. coal/oil/gas
-------
N>
O
YEAR:1971
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ~ ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH
FIRING BY BTU X HANDLING
SMSA-COUNTlT/PLAKT 10^2 BTU
MM % yr~ COAL OIL GAS
New York SMSA Orange County cont'd.
- SL Astoria
(Con Edison)
Boiler 10 200 RFRO.PCFR Dry
GFRO
20 200 RFRO.PCFR, Dry
GFRO
30 376 RFRO.PCFR Dry
GFRO
40 387 PCTA Dry
50 387 PCTA Dry
1550 45 66.56 16 63 21
des p. coal oil gas
6. East River
(Con Edison)
Boiler 1 j RFRO None
2 RFRO None
3 Total RFRO None
4 321 RFRO None
5 f RFRO None
6 RFRO None
7 ROPP None
8 ROPP None
9 J ROPP None
50 156 top-fired None
60 156 top-firad None
70 200 RFRC None
834 38 39.02 - 38 62
des oil gas
STATE
:NEW YORK
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
C
c
C
c
c
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
C
97(d)
97(d)
99(d)
99(d)
99(d)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
97(d)
INITIAL REFUSE
YEAR OF COMBUSTION
OPERATION "CAPACITY"
tons/day
1953
1954
1958
1961
1961
1926 ]
1926
1927
1927
1927
1927
1929
1929
1929 '
1950
1SS1
1955
360
360
680
700
700
>645
310
310
400
Typical
Trans
D4 c +
»5t.
ml 1 p"»
lit 1 ICO
<5
<£•
5
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:! 971
STATE :HEW YORK
SMSA-COUNTY/PUWT
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
LOAD
FACTOR
t
ENERGY
RQMT.
10^2 BTU
y
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU 2
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFK. t
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE ;
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons /day
Typical
Trans
Distance
miles
New York SMSA - Orange Co. cont'd.
7. Hell Gate
(Con Edison)
Boiler 11
12
31
32
33
41
42
43 **
51
52
53
71
72
73
81
82
83
91
92
SIT*
* Note: 2-50 Mf boilers retired in 1971
GFRO/RFRO
GFRO/RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
GTAN/RTAN
GTAN/RTAN
GTAN/RTAN
GOPP/ROPP
SOPP/ROPP
40 5BT50" 91 9
des oil gas
and not included fn total
<5
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
1946
1946
1922
1922
1922
1922
1922
1922
1923
1923
1924
1925
1925
1925
1928
1928
1929
1930
1930
1320
**No breakdown In FPC-67
-------
N>
O
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
New York SMSA Orange Co. cont'd
10. Sherman Creek*
(Con Edison)
Boiler 90
M\n
IUU
* 9. Ravenswood
(Con Edison)
Boiler 10
20
30
> 4. Arthur Kill
(Con Edison)
Boiler 2
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH
FIRING BY BTU % HANDLING
1012 BTU
Mi X vr~ COAL OIL GAS
108.25 RTAN None
trw -> •; RTAN None
2163 10 O2 - 97 3
des. oil
400 GTAN/RTAN
400 GTAN/RT.AM
]m RTAN/PCTA Dry
1828 50 7O7 - 92 8
des p. coal oil gas
376 RFRO/PCFR Dry
H° PPTA Dry
STT 41 34771 56 44
des p. coal oil
YEAR: 1971
STATE: NEW YORK
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL YEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE . EFF. %
None - 1943
None - 1947
1963
1963
C 99(d) 1965
C 99 1959
E 99.5 1969
REFUSE
•COMBUSTION
•CAPACITY"
tons/day
85
85
730
• 730
1880
605
1840
Typical
Trans
Distance
miles
<5
<5
<5
* Retired 1972
-------
SMSA-COONTY/PLANT
• .
New York SMSA Orarwe County cont'd
8. Hudson Avenue
(Con Edison)
Boiler 61
62
63
64
71
72
73
74
81
82
83
84
100
32
33
34
41
42
43
44
51
52
53
54
REFUSE COtttUSTION FOR POWER
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
W X W
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO .
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
345" 26 3OT
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU t
COAL OIL GAS
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
des oil
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
..
YEAR: 1971
STATE: NEW
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
YORK
INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/ day miles
1930 ' <5
1930
1930
1930
1932
1932
1932
1932
1932
1932
1932
1932
1950
1924
1924
1924
1926
1926
1927
1927
1928
1928
1928
1928
1440
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
NEW YORK
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
BTU
HW
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING . BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
NEW YORK SHSA. Orange County (Cont'd.)
31.
KENT AVENUE**
Con Edison
Bofler
36
36
36
108"
11
19.87
*
GTAN
RTAN
100
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. %
REFUSE • TYPICAL
COMBUSTION' TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day MILES
None None
None None
None None - -
1938
1938
1959
25
25
25
<5
des. oil/gas
* Fired Vertically Downward from Furnace Roof
** Retired, 1972.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: NEW YORK
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
LOAD
FACTOR
ENERGY
RQHT.
1012 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
COAL OIL
GAS
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFP. X tons/day miles
New York SHSA . Orange County cont'd
29.
11.
10
S
74th Street
(Con Edison)
Boiler 120
121
122
Waterside
(Con Edison)
Boiler 41
42
51
52
61
62
71
72
80
90
28. Barrett
20
89.7
89.7
89.7
269TT
22 5T68
RTAN
RTAN
RTAN
100
100
100
des
TOO
oil
_ _
7TO 33 30717"
GTAN/RTAN
GTAN/RTAN
GTAN/RTAN
GTAN/RTAN
RTAN
RTAN
'*
*
RTAN
RTAN
__
39
des oil gas
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
,__,
1956
J956
196°
,«,-
105
105
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE :NEW YORK
SMSA-COUKTY/PUWT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
HH X yr
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU I
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE £FF. 1
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day miles
Men York SHSA Orange County cont'd
14. Northport
(Long Island Lighting)
Boiler 10
20
3
387.1
387.1
,387.1
1161.3
65
RTAN
RTAN
RTAN
100
100
100
100
des oil
-
™
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA 85(d) 1967 900
MCTA 85(d) 1368 900
E 98.4(t) 1972 900
27
AREA TOTAL
SJ
s
11A99.1
518.95
-------
LEGEND
® Places of 103 OCO or more inhabitants
• Places of 50.003 to 100.000 inhabitants
D Central C'ties of SVSA's w;tn fewer than 50.000 inhabitants
O Places o' ?5.CC3 to 50.CCO inhabitants outside SMSA's
(SVSA's)
*c*ie
O 10 «0 10 <0 SO MIlCS
§
X
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
North Carolina, 1971
AREA
Asheyille SMSA
RATED
CAPACITY
W
413.6
Charlotte-Gastonia SMSA 1792.0
Durham SMSA
Wilmington SMSA
Catawba County
Chatham County
Cleveland County
Davidson County
Person County
Pitt County
Robeson County
Stokes County
Wayne County
NORTH QAROHNA STATE
TOTALS
* Plant was retired in
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR
12.5
225.0
2000.0
421.0
210.0
444.0
1067.9
20.0*
165.5
290.0
402.5
7464.0
1971.
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
20.2
120.9
0-5'
13.0
118.9V
20.1
15.8
32.4
62.3
-
9.6.
20.5
23.0
457.8'
AREA
POP.
0.148
0.568
0.193
0.109
0.092
0.030
0.074
0.097
0.026
0.074
0.085
0.024
0.086
1.606
Coal Plants
i 106
0.09
0.37
0.12
0.07
0.05
0.01
0.04
0.05,
0.01
0.04
0.05
0.01
0.05.
1.01
REFUSE
GENERATION
tons 10"12 BTU
yr yr
0.87
3.35
1.14
0.64'
0.49'
0.16.
0.39
0.51
0.13
0.39
0.45
0.12
0.45
9.15
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b %)
4.3
2.8
219.0
5.0
0.4
0.8
2.5
1.6
0.2
-
4.7
0.6
2.0
2.0
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
<5
5
22
12
8
10
10
10
< 5
< 5
5
< 5
POWER GENERATION
North Carolina, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants - Identical to table above.
-------
COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
NORTH CAROLINA
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT.
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Ashevflle SHSA
1. Asheville
(Carolina Power & Light)
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
Chatham County
2. Cape Fear
(Carolina Power & Light)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
(j 6
t- 7
P3 8
9
10
AREA TOTAL
206.6
207
4TO"
413.6
30
62.5
140.6
'**-
421.0
1Q12 BTU
yr
nFPE
?iDTMr
FIRING BY BTU
COAL OIL
GAS
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
TOO"
20.27
des p. coal
SPP.E
SPRE
100
100
55
55711
20.13
SPRE 100
SPRE 100
SPRE 100
SPRE 100
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
"T55"
des p. coal
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. *
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
C
C
95.6
99.7
1964
1971
None
None
None
None
None
None
HCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
70
70
80
80
REFUSE
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day miles
430
430
1923
1923
1923
1923
1923
1926
•60
1942 \125
1943 J
1956 285
1958 385
10
Durham 23
Raleigh 30
-------
SMSA-COUNTY/PUWT
Wayne County
3. Lee
^ . (Carolina Power & Light)
% Boiler 1
-*•" 2
3
AREA TOTAL
Person Count/
4. Roxboro .
(Carolina Power & Light)
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
W-mington SMSA
b. Sutton
(Carolina Power & Light)
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
75
75
252.5
402.5
402.5
410.9
657
1057.9
1067.9
112.5
112.5
225.0
225.0
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
,„ FIRING BY BTU *
1012 BTU
* yr COAL OIL GAS
PCTA
PCFR
PCOP
65 23.01 - 5 95
des. p. coal
23.01
PCOP 100
PCTA 100
'' 62.39 100
des. p. coal
62.39
PCTA
PCFR
62 TO2 T7 1 3T
des oil gas
13.02 P'COa1
YEAR: 1971
STATE: NORTH CAROLINA
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY". DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. * tnn<;/Hsu _,-i«-
Dry MCTA 80
Dry MCTA 80 '
Dry MCTA 80
Dry MCTA 80
Dry MCTA 80
Wet MCTA 80
Wet MCTA 80
1952
1951
1962
1966
1968
1954
1956
180 <5
180
610 Fayetteville 50
Raleigh 45
1025 <5
1640 Durham 23
Danville, Va 30
275 12
275
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
NORTH CAROLINA
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
LOAD
FACTOR
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. X
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day ml1es
Robeson County
6. Ueatherspoon
(Carolina Power 8 Light)
Boiler 1
2
3
AREA TOTAL
46
46
73.5
165.5 60
165.5
"Off
9.68
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
~BT~
des.p.coal/
gas
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA 80
MCTA 80
MCTA 80
1949
1950
1952
110
110
180
<5
Fayettevllle 31
Cnarlotte-Gastonia SMSA
7. Allen
(Duke Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
165
165
275
275
275
TTB?
81 75755"
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
HTOO
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
C
C
E
E
E
97.1
97.1
87
99.5
87
1957
1957
1959
1960
1961
455
455
765
765
765
des p. coal
-------
REFUSE rfWRiiSTTON FOR POWER GENERATION
STATE:
NORTH CAROLINA
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
KM
LOAD
FACTOR
t
ENERGY
RQKT.
1Q12 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
Charlotte-Gastonla SMSA cont'd
11. Rlverbend
(Duke Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
AREA TOTAL
Davidson Countjr.
8. Buck
(Duke Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
27.5
27.5
27.5
27.5
27.5
27.5
100
100
133
133
"637 65 45.73
1792.0 120.98
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.5
40
40
40
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFA
PCFA
PCTA
PCTA
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100 -
100
des.p.coal
— Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
- Dry
Dry
- Dry
— Dry
Dry
- Dry
-
None
None
None
None
None
None
E
E
E
E
-
-
-
-
-
87
99
99
87
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
70
70
70
70
70
70
255
255
340
340
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
** J
Dry
tft j
Dry
None
None
None
None
E
E
E
-
-
99
99
99
1926 .
1926
1926
1926
1941
1941
1942
40
40
40
40
100
100
100
1 U
Winston-Sal em
Charlotte 40
27
(Continued on next page)
-------
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Davidson cont'd
8
9
AREA TOTAL
Cleveland County
9. Cllffslde
(Duke Power
Boiler
Co.)
1
2
3
4
REFUSE
COMBUST10H FOR POWER &ENERATIOH
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
1012 BTU
m % vr~ COAL OIL GAS
125
125"
444 60
444.0
40
40
65
65
~2TO~ 75
PCTA
PCTA
100 - ' -
100
XEAR:
STATE:
NORTH CftROlINA
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL .REFUSE . TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF .COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. X tons/day miles
Dry
Dry
E
E
88
88
1953
1953
310
310
31746" 100
des.p.coal
32.46
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
TTTflT
100
100
100
100
"Too" "-"
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E .
£
£
E
99
99
88
88
1940
1940
1948
1948
125
125
205
205
10
Gastonia 30
Greenville, SC
des.p.coal
AREA TOTAL
Catawba County
10. Marshall
(Duke Power
Boiler
Co.)
1
7
f.
3
4
210.0
350
350
650
650
2000 78
15.84
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
118.97
"95 1 ~
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
C
C
E
E
95
95
97.5
97.5
1965
1966
1969
1970
885
885
1645
1645
8
Charlotte 27
des.p.coal
AREA TOTAL
2000.0
118.97
-------
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Stokes County
13. Dan River
(Duke Power Co.)
Boiler 1
5 3
AREA TOTAL
Durham SMSA
15. Chapel H111
(Chapel Hill, University of N.C.)
AREA TOTAL
REFUSE COMBUSTION
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQNT.
1012 BTU
MH 5 vr
70
70
150
290 79 2O6
290.0 20 56
12'5 36.5 0.52
12.5 o 52
FOR POWER GENERATION
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
PCTA 100 _
des.p.coal
10 27 63
des.p.coal
YEAR: 1971
STATE: NORTH CAROLINA
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
™ TU. CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF X tons/rta v s i
Dry E 99.1 1949 210 5
Dry E "-1 195° 210 WlnAonfeW"
Dry MCTA/E 99.2 1955 450 l"nston-««™
* * 20 5
* No FPC-67 filed.
-------
OHIO
l^cUkJeJl irtVtU QW» pVa^tr iO(ll
CLEVIYAN
*yooi(rovt»rj|
SK HAMILTON MjfcllTQWN
tN OPERATION
n/MPusc
Lil
<§> """
* • tr«l cit'«» °' SMSA » with ffwtf Ihtn 50.000 mh«bil>nt>
O C*"t, Ot 2? 000 10 50,000 mhjbiltnu oulndt SMSA'5
Slindwd Meltopohlin
*'«•> ISMSA'il
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
AREA
Akron SMSA
Cincinnati SMSA
Cleveland SMSA
Columbus SMSA
Dayton SMSA
Hamil ton-Mi ddletown SMSA
Lima SMSA (Incl. Anglaize
Co. & Mercer Co.)
Lorain-Elyria SMSA
Mansfield SMSA
Springfield SMSA
Steubenvi 1 1 e-Wei rton-
Wheeling SMSA
Toledo SMSA
Youngstown-Warren SMSA
Ashtabula County
Athens County
Brown County
Columbiana County
Coshoctun County
Gallia County
Henry County
Huron County
More n County
Muskingum County
Tuskarawas County
Wayne County
OHIO STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
87.5
3060.1
1289.0
287.3
935.5
83.5
85.1
787.9
26.0
100.0
7131.6
2088.7
250.0
456.0
232.0
1220.4
31.8
433.5
1086.5
23.5
31.0
1529.6
500.0
35.9
104.5
21896.9
Ohio, 1971
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
5.4
114.4
77.7
8.4
43.2
4.3
2.2
73.0
2.1
2.8
332.9
110.4-
14.0
20.9
14.5'
49.9
0.8
26.5
67.7
0.6
0.7
85.1
19.5
0.8
1.7
1080.7
- All Fossil Fuel Plants
(a)
AREA REFUSE
POP.
millions
0.691
1.409
2.104
0.939
0.873
0.230
0.251
0.262
0.133
0.161
0.350
0.704
0.541
0.100
0.055
0.027
0.109
0.034
0.025
0.028
0.050
0.012
0.078
0.077
0.089
9.332
GENERATION
106 tons
yr
0.45
0.92
1.38
0.61
0.57
0.15
0.16
0.17
0.08'
0.10
0.23
0.46
0.35
0.05
0.03
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.05
6.04
1012 BTU
yr
4.09
8.33
12.44
5.55
5.16
1.36
1.48
1.55
0.79
0.95
2.07
4.16
3.20
0.53
0.29
0.14
0.58
0.18'
0.13
0.15
0.26
0.06
0.41
0.41
0.47
54 . 36 .
POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
(a/b %)
75.2
7.3
16.0
65.6
11.9
31.3
64.6
2.1
37.1
33.9
0.6
3.8
22.8
2.5
2.0
0.3
69.2
0.7
0.2
22.1
34.7
0.1
2.1
46.7
27.8
5.0
miles
5
20
14
3
8
10
18
9
12
<5
11
12
10
<5
5
15
12
10
8
5
12
7
10
<5
9
-------
COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
AREA
Akron SMSA
Cincinnati SMSA
Cleveland SMSA
Columbus SMSA
Dayton SMSA
Hamil ton-Mi ddletown SMSA
Lima SMSA (Incl. Anglaize
Co. & Mercer Co.)
Lorain-Elyria SMSA
Mansfield SMSA
Springfield SMSA
Steubenvi 1 1 e-Wei rton-
Wheeling SMSA
Toledo SMSA
Youngs town -Warren SMSA
Ashtabula County
Athens County
Brown County
Columbiana County
Coshoctun County
Gall i a County
Henry County
Huron County
Morgan County
Muskingum County
Tuskarawas County
Wayne County
OHIO STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
87.5
2840.8
1289.0
287.3
935.5
83.5
85.1
787.9
26.0
100.0
7131.6
2088.7
250.0
456.0
232.0
1220.4
31.8
433.5
1086.5
23.5
31.0
1529.6
500.0
35.9
104.5
21677.6
Ohio,
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
5.4
6.8
77.7
8.4
43.2
4.3
2.2
73.0
2.1
2.8
332.9
110.4
14.0
20.9
14.5
49.9
0.8
26.5
67.7
0.6.
0.7
85.1
19.5
0.8
1.7
973.2
1971 - "Coal Plants" Only*
(a)
AREA REFUSE
POP. GENERATION
millions 106 tons 101Z BTU
0.691
1.409
2.104
0.939
0.873
0.230
0.251
0.262
0.133
0.161
0.350
0.704
0.541
0.100
0.055
0.027
0.109
0.034
0.025
0.028
0.050
0.012
0.078
0.077
0.089
9.332
yr
0.45
0.92
1.38
0.61
0.57
0.15
0.16
0.17
0.08
0.10
0.23
0.46.
0.35.
0.05
0.03
0.01
0.06
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.03
0.00
0.04
0.04
0.05
6.04
yr
4.09
8.33
12.44
5.55
5.16
1.36
1.48
1.55
0.79
0.95
2.07
4.16
3.20
0.53
0.29
0.14
0.58
0.18
0.13
0.15
0.26
0.06
0.41.
0.41.
0.47
54.36
POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
(a/b %) miles
7C ?
7?.i
16.0
65.6
11.9
31.3
fit C
04 . O
2.1
37.1
33.9
0.6
3.8
22.8
2.5
2.0
0.3
69.2
0.7
0.2
22.1
34.7
0^-
.1
2.1
46.7
/«•• n
27.8
5.6
5
18
14
3
8
10
1 Q
1 O
1 0
1 c.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
HU
LOAD
FACTOR
2
ENERGY
RQMT.
•\Q\2 gjy
yT
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL
GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
Akron SHSA
10. Gorge
(Ohio Edison Co.)
Boiler
25
26
AREA TOTAL
43.75
43.74
87750.
87.5
56 5.43
5.43
PCFR
PCFR
100
TOO
100
des.
p-coal
Dry MCAX/E 83/99.5 1943
Dry MCAX/E 85/99.5 1948
115
115
Warren-Youngstown 40
Cleveland 25
Cincinnati SMSA
1. Beckjord
(Cincinnati Gas & Electric)
Boiler '
115
112.5
125
163.2
244.8
A60.B
12*1.3
PCTA
PCTA
PCFR
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
65
99 1
des. p-coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
92
92
93
94
95
97
1952
1953
1954
1958
1962
1969
275
270
300
390
585
1105
-------
SMSA-COWrr/PLANT
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
FOR POWER
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
MW X yr
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
"CAPACITY"
tons/ day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
Cincinnati SMSA - cont'd
2. West End
(Cincinnati Gas & Electric)
Boiler 5-1
5-2
5-3
6-1
6-2
6-3
28. Miami Fort
(Cincinnati Gas & Electric)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
107
112.3
IT973
63
63
65
65
100
163.2
26
735
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
GFRO
41
.
-
.
.
.
-
-
.
.
_
.
.
.
-
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
1937
1937
1938
1948
1948
1948
155
160
des. gas
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
100
100
100
100
100
100
luu
des.
-
p-coal
-
—
Dry
Dry
Wet
Wet
Dry
Dry
None -
None
None -
None
None
C 94
1925
1926
1938
1942
1949
1960
100
100
105
105
160
265
8
15
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED
CAPACITY
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
MM
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQMT, OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
X yr~
CINCINNATI SMSA-conf d
ind. 6 .
Tanners Creek, Dearborn Co., Ind.
(Indiana & Michigan Elec. Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
1100.3
AREA TOTAL 3060.1
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
CYCL
48 41777
114.41
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
100
100
100
des. p-coal
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. j L tons/day Mi 1 es
MCTA 77.9(t) 20
MCTA 75 .
MCTA 72.2(t)
MCTA 74.7
1875
Cleveland SMSA
26.
Painesville*
(Painesville Electric Lgt. Dept)
Boiler 1 6.5
2 7.5
3 7.5
4 16.5
1
OSTO
OSTO
SPRE
SPRE
33 "TT8T
100
Dry
Dry
None - 1938 IQ 35
None - 1947 ]5
S 94-3W 1954 15
MCAX 94.3(d) I960 30
des. coal/oil
* to be expanded 1974
fc
4-
-------
REFUSE COHBUSTIOH FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
SMSA-COUHTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
HU
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY
RQMT.
10" BTU
EL-
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU C
COAL OIL CAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE
EFF. %
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANSPORT
DISTANCE
HILE5
"•,.; ; : „
CLEVELAND SMSA - cont'd
5. EASTLAKE
Cleveland Electric Ilium.Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
123
123 .
123
208
577.0 81
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
40.38
100
des
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
p-coal
C
C
C
C
98
98
98
96
1953
1953
1954
1956
365
365
365
620
ZZ
6. CUYAHOGA
Cleveland Electric 111 urn. Co.
Boiler 91
92
93
94
18
60
60
69
69
256
514
58
28.55
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
PCFR
PCTA
100
100
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Dry
100
des. p-coal
82
82.
94
94
99
1941
1941
1951
1951
1962
140
140
160
160
605
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
unj tf
ENERGY TYPE
RQMT. OF
FIRING
TO1* BTU
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU 35
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOH
ASH
HANDLING
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL YEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE EFF. %
REFUSE .
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons /day
i TYPICAL
TPANS.
DISTANCE
: Miles
CLEVELAND SMSA-cont'd
43. Lake Road
Cleveland Dept. of Public Utilities
Boiler 1
1 1
2
3
4
80
5 1
6 85
T6Q 28
AREA TOTAL 1239.0
or
77.72
98 2
des.p-coal/o1l
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
C
C
E
70
70
70
70
70
98
1941
1941
1941
1953
1953
1967
145
155
COLUMBUS SMSA
30.
PICWAY
Columbus &
So.Ohio Elw.
Boiler
6
7
8
9
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
230.8 25
6.95
99
des
1
coal
Wet
Wet
Wet
Dry
None •-
None -
None • -,
Cycl, SOT
1955
Yes
290
44. COLUMBUS
City of Columbus Electric
Boiler
12.5
12.5
SPRE
OSTO
Dry
Dry
MCAX S2.3(t)
None "
1938
1949
10
10
<5
-------
10
to
YEAR: 1971
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
COLUMBUS SMSA-cont'd
44. Columbus-cont'd
8
9
AREA TOTAL
DAYTON SMSA
7. HUTCHINGS
Dayton Power & Light Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
' .6
RATED
CAPACITY
MT
19
12.5
BTT
287.3
69
69
69
69
69
69
419
LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
FACTOR RQWT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
X vr COAL OIL GAS
GFRO
GRFO
25 TT3T 32 2 66
des.s-coal/gas
8.46
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
54 20.34 99 - 1
des p-coal
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
None
None
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
STATE: OHIO
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. *
None
None
MCTA 29.8
MCTA 32.8
MCTA 80.8
MCTA/E ||;f
nCAX/L QQ Q
HCAX/E Q'$
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1962
1969
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
REFUSE
TYPICAL
COMBUSTION .TRANSPORT
"CAPACITY
tons/day
20
10
140
140
4 - n
14Q
140
140
140
11 DISTANCE
MILES
Dayton 60
10
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
HU
LOAD
FACTOR
<
ENERGY
RQHT.
101* BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASK
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
Dayton SHSA-cont'd
8. Tait
Dayton Power & Light Co.
Boiler 4
5
7-1
7-2
8-1
8-2
31. Troy
Dayton Power & Light Co.
40. Piqua
Piqua Municipal
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
Power Plant
AREA TOTAL
147
147.1
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
474TT
24.4
33
20
~53
935.5
48
TO?
PCTA
PCTA*
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
100
100
100
100 -
100
100 -
100
des.p-coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
C
C
C
C
C
C
94
94
71
71
71
71
1958
1959
1937
1937
1940
1940
0.04
31
* ,o FPC 67 filed
~2T§3
43 ..26
100 -
des.s-coal
280
280
70
70
70
70
<5
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
100 - -
des.s-coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
None
None
Hone
GRAV
GRAV
GRAV
80
80
90
1933
1933
1940
1947
1951
1961
75
45
n
30
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
SMSA-COUMTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
HW
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
vr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. *
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
J TYPICAL
TRANS.
.DISTANCE
jJHiles
HAMILTON-HIDDLETOHN SMSA
37.
LIMA
32.
%
Hamilton
Hamilton Municipal Electric
Boiler 1 . \
2
3
4 J
5
6
7 .
8
AREA TOTAL
SMSA .
Woodcock
Ohio Power Company
Boiler 1 ]
2 I
3 j
4
5
38.5
10
10
25
BITS' 39
83.5 4.35
12.5
12.5
12.5
under-
feed
OSTO
OSTO
SPRE.-.
PCFR
74 1
des.coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
25
25
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
95 5
des.p-coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
None - 1929
None - 1929
None - 1929
None - 1930
GRAV 70 1946
GRAY 70 1950
MCTA 90(d) 1960
MCTA 85 1966
10
85
20
20
50
Cincinnati 20
Dayton 30
None
None
None
None
MCTA MR
1938
1938
1941
1947
1950
15
15
15
15
-------
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Lina SMSA-cont'd
Mercer County
34. Celina
.Celina Municipal Utilities
42. St. Mary's
St. Mary's Municipal Light &
Power Oept.
AREA TOTAL
Lorain-Elyria SHSA
9. Edgewater
Ohio Edison Co.
Boiler 11 I
12 J
13
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
W % yr
25
22.6
85.1
87.9
105.0
T92T9"
17 0.46
15 0.36
2.29
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
40 ~77H
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100 -
des.s-coal
98 2
des.s-coal
100 - -
100
100
100
des.p.coal
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. * tons/day Miles
* * * 15 30
* ' * 10 W
Springfield 55
Dayton 55
Dry MCTA 85{d) 1949 \ 150 S
Dry MCTA 85(d) 1949 J
Dry E 93 1957 180
* Ko FPC 67 filed
-------
SMSA-COUNTY/PUWT
REFUSE
COHBUSTIOH FOR POVffR
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT.
1012 BTU
NU X W
TYPE
OF
FIRING
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
i TYPICAL
TRANSPORT
DISTANCE
MILES
LORAIN-ELYRIA SMSA- conf d
4. AVON LAKE
Cleveland Electric Illunln-
g Company
Boiler 1"
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 „
" 190
9 86
10 86
11 233
595 59
AREA TOTAL: 787.9
PCQtf
ROPP
nor/
ROPP
pcotf
ROPP
PCOB'
ROPP
PCOB'
ROPP
PCOB*
ROPP
PCOlV
ROPP
PCOP/
ROPP
PCTA
PCTA
?nmr PCTA
73.02
100 - • -
100
100
100 -
100
100 - -
100
100
100
100
100
100
des. p-coal/o.1l
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
•
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
95 "\ "\
95
95
95. .
95-
95.
95.
95 ' )
. 1926,*
1928
>
415
t
95 1949 185
95 1949 185
97 1959 505
10
efficiency based on coal-firing
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
SMSA-COUNTY/PLAHT
RATED
CAPACITY
KW
LOAD
FACTOR
%
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
y
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. %
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE .
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANSPORT
DISTANCE
MILES
MANSFIELD SHSA
27. SHELBY
Shelby Municipal Co.
AREA TOTAL:
Boiler 1
3
4
12.5
6
7.5
26 55-
26.0
2.13.
2.13
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
1W
des.
coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCAX/E 99(t) 1967 25
MCAX/E 80/N.R. 1945 10
MCAX/E 80/N.R. 1954 165
12
SPRINGFIELD SHSA
11. MAD RIVER
Ohio Edison Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
AREA TOTAL:
25
25
25
1L
100
100 .
29
2.80
2.80
OSTO
OSTO
PCTA
PCFR
100
100
100
100
100
des s & p-coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA 55
MCTA 55
MCTA 79
MCTA 80
1927
1927
1938
1949
35
35
35
35
<5
* State average
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
OHIO
SHSA-COUHTY/PLAKT
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
LOAD
FACTOR
f
ENERGY
RQKT.
1Q12 BTU
vr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS '
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/ day
TYPICAL
TRANSPORT
DISTANCE
MILES
MHEELING-STEUBENVILLE-HEIRTON SHSA*
17. TIDD
Ohio Power Company
Boiler
11
12
21
115.1
U3-Z
2Z673
60
TOSB
PCTA
PCTA
PCFR
des p-coal
Dry MCTA 30
Dry MCTA 30
Dry MCTA 73
1945
1945
1948
10
250
250
18. CARDINAL
Ohio Power Co.&Buckeye Rural Corp.
(Op.by Cardinal Operating Co.)
Boiler 1 615.2
2 615.2
1230.4
74
75.93
PCFR
PCFR
des p-coal
Dry
Dry
E
E
92
92
1967
1967
1615
1615
10
*Steubenv1lle-Ue1rton SMSA and Wheeling SMSA are two separate SMSA's-
combined Into one unit for the purpose of this study.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
SHSA-COUNTY/PLAMT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
m % w
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL
GA!
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
REFUSE TYPICAL
-COMBUSTION iTRANSPORT
!!«•• rt * ft w«> » •_.
TYPE EFF, %
tons/day
MILES
HHEELING-STEUBENVILLE-WEIRTON SMSA - conf d
29. BURGER
Ohio Edison Co,
Boiler
33. MARTINS FERRY
Ohio Power Co.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
31.25
31.25
31.25
31.25
50
50
159.5
159.5
544.0
64
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
•• ...
- -
.
.. .
.- _
•- .•
„ _
-
100
des
p-coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
C
C
80
80
80
80
80
80
97
97
1944
1944
1947
1947
1950
1950
1955
1955
75
75
75
75
125
125
400
400
10
-------
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
REFUSE COHBUST10M FOR POMER
RATED
CAPACITY
NH
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
vr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
GENERATION
YEAR: 197!
STATE: OHIO
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL CIL
GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPF
EFF. I
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANSPORT
DISTANCE
MILES
13. SAMNIS
Ohio Edison
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
4. TORONTO
Ohio Edison
Boiler 9
10
11
185
185
185
185
317.5
623
623
2363.5
43.8
66
66
175.8
43
"
45
8OSF
9.85
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCOP
PCOP
PCOP
100 - -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 - -
100
des p-coal
100 - *
100
100
^00
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
97
97
97
97
99
99
99
Wet
Dry
Dry
MCAX 85(d
MCAX 85(d
MCAX. 85 d
1959
1960
1961
1962
1967
1969
1971
1940
1949
1949
275
275
275
275
470
925
925
100
155
155
10
des p-coal
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION Jfjf£. Q^J
SSSlTY SSoR gT 5* oSSkSSi S™1 «R POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE 'TYPICAL
fuf. cioTwr RY RTII » ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANSPORT
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT- 10^ BTU "ANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
!S! X— *r COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF -
WHEELING-STEUBENVILLE-WEIRTON SMSA rnnf,i
. HV . 13 WINDSOR, W.Virginia
Beechbottos Power Co.
Boiler 72 1 150 - PCTA Dry WTA 77 1939
82 { 1M SS* Dry MCTA 77 1939
J! 15° 5S* ' Dry MCTA 77 1941
M J ^R-- ,, PCTA Drv MCTA 77 1041
JOO 24 11.55 99 1 -
des p-coal
WV 11 KAMMER. W. Virginia
Ohio Power Company
B°1ler J CYCL 100 - - Wet MCTA 85 1958
\ CYCL 100 - - Wet MCTA 85 958
3 _. T_nr CYCL 100 - - Wet MCTA flR low
712.5 58 35.94 IflO - -
des p-coal
WV .14 MITCHELL, W.Virginia
Ohio Power Company
BOllCr 2 I«? 22 Dr^ E 96'88 197'
2 816.3 PCOP Drv E Qft « 1071
1632.6 53 72.19 98 2 - ..•»»•
des p-coal
AREA TOTAL: 7131.6 3^,99
MILES
tons/day
}240 '°
\240
II
1540
1535 M
1535
This plant started up in 1971 with an actual plant factor of 25X .,. The energy requirement shown here is based on a 53* factor, the average for W.Va.
-------
YEAR: lq?1
REFJSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU I
SNSA-COUKTY/PLANT 1012 BTU
HW % yr COAL OIL SAS
TOLEDO SHSA
20. ACHE
Toledo Edison Co.
Boiler 16 Top-fired
13 Top- fired
14 Top- fired
15 Top-fired
91 Top-fired
92 Top-f1red
30T~ 30 TOT 82 lo 8
des p-coal/oil
STATE: OHIO
BOHOM
ASH
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
TYPE EFF.>*
C 98.5
MCTA 99.5
MCTA 99.5
MCTA 99.5
C 96.5
C 96.5
INITIAL REFUSE
YEAR OF -COMBUSTION
OPERATION "CAPACITY"
tons/day
1951
1938
1941
1941
1949
1949
435
i TYPICAL
TRANSPORT
DISTANCE
MILES
<5
21. BAYSHORE
Toledo.Edison Co.
Boiler
i
2
3
4
140
140
140
219.6
53575'
72
37726"
Top-fired
Top-fired
PCFR
PCFR
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
-
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
C
C
E
E
98
96.7
99.5
99
1955
1959
1963
1968
345
345
345
545
10
100
des p-coal
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT 1()12 M
TOLFDQ SMSfl - qjnfd
MICH 5 WHITING
Consumer Power Co.
3 125
325 77 21.76
MICH 18 MONROE
Detroit Edison
Boiler 1 817.2 59*
817.2 4OI
AREA TOTAL: 2088.7 110.49
FOR POWER GENERATION
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
PCFR 100 - -
100 - . -
des p-coal
PCOP
97 3
des p-coal
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
HANDLING OPERATION
TYPE EFF. X
Dry MCAX 85 1952
Dry E 96 1971
REFUSE ; TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANSPORT
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
MILES
7
355
1 /"\
1725 2°
* Based on a load factor of 59* (average for Michigan). This plant was started up in 1971, and had -a load factor of 30X for that year.
u
-------
EEFVKE COHBUSTIOH FOR POWER 6ENERAT10N
XEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF
.„ FIRING
1012 BTU
MW x vr
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR P01
ASH CON1
HANDLING
TYPE
INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANSPORT
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
MILES
tons/day
YOUN6STOWN-MARREN SUM
.12. NILES
Ohio Edison Company
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL;
125
J25_.
250 63
250
Cycl
Cycl
14.06
ASHTABULA COUNTY
3. ASHTABULA
Cleveland Elec. Ilium. Co.
Boiler
n
2
3
4
5
6 }
7
200
255
48
AREA TOTAL;
456
2~O8"
20.98
100
100
100
des p-coal
Wet
Wet
100
des p-coal
MCAX 70
MCAX 70
1954
1954
10
PCOP
PCOP
PCOP
PCOP
PCOP
PCOP
PCTA
100
100
100
100
100
100 -
100
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
75^
75
75
75
75
75 .
h 1930
1931
96 1958
<5
395
500
Cleveland 55
Wa rren-Youngstown
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENFRATTnH
^IfS. LOAD ENERGY T^PE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT 19 FIRING BY BTU 2
1971
ATHENS COUNTY
46. PQSTON
Columbus & S. Ohio Elec. Co.
8o11er I PCFR 100
% PCFR 100
I PCFR 100
4 AAJL PCTA 100
"' 54 14.58 )00
des p-coal
AREA TOTAL: 232 14.5B
BROWN COUNTY
25. STUART
Dayton Power & L1$ht Co.
Boiler 1 610.2 pcop
2 610.2 • PCOP
M»n A. en TS-FT -xx- . '.
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
OHIO
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL YEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE EFF. «
MCTA 50
HCTA 50
MCAX 50
MCAX 50
E 86[t)
E 92M
tm
1949
1950
1952
1954
1970
1971
REFUSE { TYPICA|
COMBUSTION TB!N^T
*/*AD*r» TTVM '
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
S5m Hera RSGY
uumiTT FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
o7E
OF
DCT«
DISTRIBUTION
COA<- 0"-- GAS
?OTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANSPORT
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. %
tons/day
COLUMBIANA COUNTY
41. READING
City of Reading
36. EAST PALESTINE
East Palestine Lgt. & Water
AREA TOTAL
COSHOCTON COUNTY
24. CONESVILLE
Columbus & S. Ohio
15.3 32 0.52
16.5 19 0.32
31.8
Boiler 1
2
3
AREA TOTAL-
433.5
No FPC-67 filed
0 84
Cycl
67 zTBT
26.55
100
des p-coal
100
des p-coal
100
des p-coal
Wet None - 1954
Met None - 1957
Dry Cycl 60 1962
20
12
10
fi- Youngs town 20
Akron 40
1130
10
Columbus 60
Canton 50
-------
SHSA- COUNTY/PLANT
REFUSE
COMBUSTION FOR POWER
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT.
1012 BTU
W % W
TYPE
OF
FIRING
GENERATION
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
YEAS: 1971
STATE: OHIO
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. *
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANSPORT
DISTANCE
MILES
CALLIA COUNTY
19, KYGER CREEK
Ohio Valley Elec. Corp.
Boiler
1
2
3
4
5
AREA TOTAL:
HENRY COUNTY
38. NAPOLEON
Napoleon M1n1c1pal Utilities
AREA TOTAL:
217.3
217.3
217.3
217.3
217.3
1036.5 76
1086.5
23.5 28
23.5
67.70
67.70
PCFR
iPCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
100
160
100
100
100
100
des
-
p. coal
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
C
C
C
C
C
96.1
96.1
96.1
96.1
96.1
1955
T955
1955
1955
1955
570
£70
570
570
570
0.68
0.68
100
des
coal
Huntington, W Va 45
25
Toledo 40
Lima 45
* No FPC-67 filed
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANSPORT
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
* ,J MILES
tons/day
HURON COUNTY
39. NORWALK
Norwalk Municipal Light.
Boiler 1
2
* 3
^ 4
^ 5
AREA TOTAL:
MORGAN COUNTY
15. MUSKINGUM RIVER
Ohio Power Company
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
~3T~ 24
31.0
214
213
229
229
J543. 6
0.77
0 77
Front-
fired
OSTO
OSTO
SPRE
PCFR
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Drv
None
None
' None
MCAX
E
88
98
1955
1935
1941
1961
1969
AREA TOTAL;
29. (
1529.6
63
55716"
85.16
des s-coal/oll
30
12
Lor?1n-Elryia
Cleveland 45
25
PCFR
PCFR
Cycl
Cycl
PCOP
100
100
100 -
100
100
100
Wet
Wet
Wet
- Wet
Drv
-
MCTA/E 80/99
MCTA/E 80/99
. E 88
E 88
C/E B5(ty
67.5
1953
1954
1957
1958
1968
470
470
505
505
1425
Columbus 65
des p-coal
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POHER 6EHERATIOH
YEAR: 1971
STATE: OHIO
SMSA-CQWrY/PUWT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQKT.
BTU
N4
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRMS . BY BTU >
COAL OIL 6AS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF
REFUSE
TYPICAL
HANDLING
OPERATION
TYPE EFF. X
COMBUSTION TRANSPORT
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
MILES
tons/day
MUSKIK6UH COUNTY
16. PHILO
Ohio Power Company
Boiler
2-l\
2-4
31
32
33
35
36
37
34
38
41
42
51
52 ,
>*
34
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
Cycl
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
des
_
-
..
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
.
.
-
•- ••
—
s & p-coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Met
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
None
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
84
64
86
86
84
84
*
1924
1924
1929
1929
1929
1929
1929
1929
1931
1931
1941
1941
1942
1942
1957
AREA TOTAL;
500
19.57
10
840
Columbus 55
Wheeling 65
* Deactivated Reserve; boiler capacities not reported.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
STATE:
SMSA-COUKTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
MU
1Q12 BTU
yr
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOHOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE J!«M«nDT
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANSPORT
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY"
TYPE EFF. %
tons/day
TUSCARAWAS COUNTY
35. DOVER
Dover Electric Lgt.& Power
35.9 23
35.9
0.88
WAYNE COUNTY
22. VINE STREET
Orville Municipal
Boiler
AREA TOTAL:
u
3 \ 44.5
n
6 30
7 30
104.5 1.71
* 100 -
des s-coal
* *
IK
35
<5
Warren-Youngstown 6
»
Akron 20
Cleveland 40
* No-FPC-67 filed
-------
%«tsfc**>
-F ^;*I hBINGHAMTON
( -, ,
•OO» II
•
t«C««M
•-m, "
(•) Places ol 100.COO or rnore iihab''3nts
• P1»c« ol 50.000 to 100.COO .rhab'iants
O Cfnrrat cit.es ol SMS* s «'in (t«er ;njn 50.000 "i
O Pljen ol 25.000 to 50.COO ^habitants outside SMSA's
f^ "~i Slandi'd Metrcpoi.tjn
t --» Statistical *rtas ISMSA s)
-------
ro
Pennsylvania, 1971
(b)
RATED ENERGY
AREA
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton
Altoona SMSA
(incl. Bedford County)
Erie SMSA (incl. Warren Co
Harrisburg SMSA
Lancaster SMSA
Philadelphia SMSA
CAPACITY
MW
SMSA 865.3
70.9
.) 203.4
117.0
105.0
3660.2
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
55.5
4.5
14.6
4.5
8.5
205.3
" Ml Fossil Fuel Plants
(a)
AREA REFUSE
POP.
millions
0.549
0.180
0.316
0.418^
0.32S
4.893
GENERATION
Ifl6 tons
yr
0.36
0.11
0.20
0.27
0.21
3.21
1012 BTU
yr
3.25
1.06
1.87
2.47
1.92
28.94
POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
(a/b%)
5.8
23.3
12.8
54.3
22.6
14.1
miles
25
18
25
10
15
10
Pittsburgh SMSA (incl. Lawrence
Co, Green Co, Fayette Co,
Co, and Armstrong Co)
Reading SMSA
Wilkes-Barre-Hazelton SMSA
York SMSA
Clearfield County
Centre County
Franklin County
Union-Snyder-Montour-
Northumberland Counties
PENNSYLVANIA STATE TOTALS
Indiana
10417.9
309.0
239.0
1558.7
640.0
46.0
19.1
409.8
18661.3
460.5
16.1
15.2
84.0.
43.7
3.5
0.8
31.3
948.5
2.884
0.299
0.348
0.334
0.075
0.101
0.102
0.175:
11.002
1.89
0.19
0.22
0.21
0.04
0.06
0.06
0.10
7.36
17.05
1.77
2.06
1.97
0.40
0.54
0.54
0.94
64.78
3.7
10.9
13.5
2.3
0.9
15.2
63.3
3.0
6.8
25
5
12
15
5
10
5
10
Includes all plants detailed on attached data sheets.
-------
REFUSE COMBUST10H TOR POWER GENERM10H
Pennsylvania, 1971 - "Coal Plants" Only
RATED
CAPACITY
AREA MM
AT 1 entown-Bethl ehem-Easton
SMSA
Altoona SMSA (Incl. Bedford
County)
Erie SMSA (incl. Warren Co.)
Harrisburg SMSA
Lancaster SMSA
Philadelphia SMSA
Pittsburgh SMSA (incl. Lawrence
Greene, Fayette, Indiana and
Armstrong Counties)
Reading SMSA
Wilkes-Barre-Hazelton SMSA
York SMSA
Clearfield County
Centre County
Franklin County
Union-Snyder-Montour
Northumberland Counties
PENNSYLVANIA STATE TOTALS
865.3
70.9
203.4
117.0
105.0
3334.8
»
10417.9 "
309.0
239.0
1558.7
640.0
46.0
19. l'
409.8
18335.9
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
,J5TU
loizyr-
55.5
4.5
14.6:
•4.5 .
8.5
187.1
460.5
16.1
15.2
84.0
43.7
3.5'
0.8
31.3
930.3
AREA
POP.
millions
.549 -
.180
.316
.418
.325
4.893
2.884
.299
.348
.334
.075
.101
.02
.175
11.002
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
tons .JJTU
}Q6~fr 1012yF~
.36
.11
.20.
.27
.21'
3.21r
1.89
.19-
.22
.219
.04*
0.06
0.06
0.10
7.19
3.25
1.06
1.87
2.47
1.92
28.94
17.05
1.77
2.06
1.97
0.40
0.54
0.54
0.94
64.78
POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
(a/b X) miles
5.8
23.3
12.8
54.3
22.6
15.5
3.7
10.9
13.5"
2.3
0.9
15.2
3.0
7.0
25
18
25
10
15
10
25
<5
12
15
5
10
Includes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel). Includes all plants in
attached data sheets except No. 25 (Philadelphia SMSA).
* Does not differentiate between types of firing -- assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE PENNSYLVANIA
RATED
5MSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton SMSA
5. Portland
(Metropolitan Edlsoi)
Boiler 1*
2
k.
h.
5 14. Martins Creek
(Pennsylvania Power & Light)
Boiler 1
2
NJ 5. Gilbert
flew Jersey Power A Light )
Boiler 1
2 ,
3
AREA TOTAL
SFKITY «of.« JST tf™ SSS! m S ST *"cE10" SII'S
*««,""* """" ^'»6 S5&
»! 1 yr COAL on cac «,«. „. -
174.7
252.0
41677 69 H758
156.25
31275" 66 IQT5T
}57.1
69.0
126.1 7? ~fT8
865.3 (55.57)
B/TA
PCTA
PCTA
PCFR
PCFR
PCOP
PCOP
PCTA
99 1 -
des. p. coal
100
100
100
des. p. coal
4 65 31
des. p. coal oil
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
gas
C 99
C/cat-ox 99/90
desulf.
E
E
E
E
Cycl/E
85
85
88.8
88.8
90
1958
1962
1954
1956
1930
1930
1949
REFUSE
COMBUSTIC
K "CAPACITY
tons/day
435
630
430
430
} 185
225
TYPICAL
IN TRANS.
'" DISTANCE
miles
25
25
25
* Boiler capacities prorated to give plant total.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
AUoona SHSA
Bedford County
40. Sax ton
{Penn. Elec. Co.)
Boiler 2
3
4
5
6
7
8
41. W1 Hamburg
(Penn. Elec. Co.)
, Boiler 11
* 2
Ls 4
CS 6 '
8
10
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR ROJ1T. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
IW X yf~
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.8
6.1
4079" 1.4 0755
30" 68 3756
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
PCFR
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
tOAt OIL GAS"
100 - -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
des. p. Coal
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
des. s,p. coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. X
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Hech.
Dry Collect. 78
Dry ~ - "\
Dry - 1
Dry -
Dry - J
Dry -
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1923
1923
1923
1926
1926
1926
1926
1944
1914
to
1921
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
i
tons/day
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
i en
I5U
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
20
VI
AREA TOTAL
70.9
4.54
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATErPENNSYLVANIA
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
— :
RATED
CAPACITY
m
LOAD
FACTOR
«
ENERGY
RQKT.
1Q12 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE .
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TO4I||C
DISTANCE
Miles
Erie SHSA
Warren County
10. Warren
(Penn. Elec. Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
39. Front Street
Boiler 7
8
9
10
21.15
21.15
21.15
21.15
-
15.4
15.4
44
44
1TO
75
THT
52
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
PCTA
100
100 '-
100
100
.100
des. p. coal
99 1
des. p. coal
_
»
_
.
_
.
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
95
95
95
95
80
80
90
90
1948
1948
1949
1949
1944
1944
1952
1952
75
75
75
75
40
40
115
115
40
10
AREA TOTAL
203.4
14.64
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POKER GEKERATIOK
YEAR:1971
STATEPENKSYLVANIA
SMSA-COUWnr/PLAKT
Clearffeld County
9. Shawvnie
(Penn. Elec. Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
AREA TOTAL
Lancaster SMSA
13. Holtwood
{Penn. Power i Light)
Boiler 1
v 2
f 3
r*X 17
x^_\
IfflTEO LOAD tSERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF .
FIRING
MM ' % W
134
134
186
186
5W 72
640 .
10
10
10
75
16? 66
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
PCTA
43,70
43.70
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
8.51
CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL
BY BTU % HANDLING
COAL OIL €AS TYPE EFF. %
99 1
•des. p. coal
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
des. p. coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
C
C
C
C
E
E
E
C
95.8
95.8
98.5
98.5
85
85
85
97
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1954
1954
1959
1960
1925
1925
1925
1954
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
miles
tons/day
385 5
535 • Altoona 40
535
30 15
30
30
255
AREA TOTAL
105
B.51
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE PENNSYLVANIA
SMSA-COONTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
HW X yr COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION , TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" . DISTANCE
miles
TYPE EFF. 1 tons/dav
Centre County
27.
Mllesburg
(West Penn. Power Co.)
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
23
23
46 69 37?4~
46 3.54
PCFR 100 -
PCFR 100 -
TOO
des. p. coal
Dry
Dry
C 81 1950
C 86 1950
70 10
70 .
A1 toona 45
Harrlsburg SHSA
4.
fc;
u
vwt
Crawford
(Metropolitan Edison)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
10
10
10
10
15
26
26
Tf7 27 4TBT
. . _ • ff
top fired
top fired
top fired
top fired
top fired
top fired
PCOP
PCOP
62 38 -
des. p. coal /oil
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
1924
1925
1924
1925
1926
1927
E 90 1947
E 90 1947
.
-15 10
15
15
15
15
20
40
40
AREA TOTAL
-1H
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 197]
STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
SHSA-COUKTY/RUWr
RATED
CAPACITY
HW
LOAD
FACTOR
%
ENERGY
RQMT.
10'2 BTU
i J?z
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
•RP1CAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
Philadelphia SHSA
Z5. Schuylkill
(Philadelphia Elec. Co.)
Boiler 1*
2
3
23
24
20. Chester
(Philadelphia Elec. Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
11
13
15
18
20
188.6
T-83.1
1 53.7
66
18.24
RTAN
RTAN
RTAN
RTAN
RTAN
.
-
_
-
-
-
ties.
TOO
100
100
100
100
TOO"
011
_
.
_
_
-
-
126.5
129.5
25? 36
SPRE DRY
SFRE DRY
SPRE DRY
SPRE DRY
SPRE DRY
SPRE DRY
SPRE DRY
SPRE DRY
SPRE DRY
SPRE DRY
SPRE . DRY
SPRE DRY
PCFR DRY
PCFR DRY
"H~ ~7T ~W
des. p. coal oil gas
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
E
E
66
80
80
90 (d) .
90 (d)
1958
1968
1968
1938
1938
450
\195
J125
10
None
ID
HCAX
MCAX
85 coal
40 0)1
85 coal
40 oil
1918-
1924
1941
1941
245
250
* Boiler capacities prorated to give plant total
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
RATED
CAPACITY
SKSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Phlladelohla SMSA
NO 7.
Burlington
(PSE & G)
Boiler
- cont'd
(NJ)
11*
12
13
14
15
7
MW
46.4
1
J126.8
/
}l28.8
201.0
503
LOAD ENERGY
FACTOR RQHT.
1012 BTU
% yr
48 24.24
•
TYPE
OF
FIRING
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
des
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
100
100
100
100
• _ 100
.p. coal oil
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
None
it
*
•
*
»
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
None
E 95 d)
E 95 d)
E 95 d)
E 95 d)
C 97 (d)
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1932
1940
1940
1943
1943
1955
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
on
yu
\ 255
I
| 260
A in
*Hu
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
10
24. Richmond
(Philadelphia Elec. Co.)
Boiler
ft
63
64
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
65
66
'184.8
119.9
170.1
47O 54
* Boiler capacities prorated to plant total.
28.96
PCTA
PCTA
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
PCFR
PCFR
des
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
—
.
•p.
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
IDQ
TOO
coal oil
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
.
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
WET
WET
MCAX/E 50
MCAX/E 50
MCAX/E 50
MCAX/E 50
1950
1950
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
1926
475
10
> 310
-------
REFUSE COreUSTJON FOR POWER SENPPATTnn
YEAR: 1971
STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
SKSA-COflfTY/PLANT
Philadelphia "area - Cont'd
22. DeTaware
(Philadelphia Elec. Co.)
Boiler 71
81
13
bi
^-
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
NJ 18. Glbbstovm (NJ)
(Atlantic City Elec. Dept.)
i.3. Eddystone
(Philadelphia Elec. Co.)
Boiler 1 **
2
50
11.5 51
ENERGY
RQMT.
re^Bitr
vr
20.77
0.61
TYPE
OF
FIRING
PCFR
PCFR
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE .
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
SPRE
des.p
* des
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Too" ~^~
. coal oil
p. coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASK CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION i TRANS
HANDLING OPERATION- "CAPACITY1' DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. X tons/day m1l6S
DRY MCAX/E 50 1953 10
DRY MCAX/E 55 1953
DRY Mont.
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
920-
no A
924
875
25 10
351.7
355.5
ToTI
68
37.56
PCTA
PCTA
DRY
DRY
MCAX/E 99.4
MCAX/E 99.3
1959
1960
800
805
10
* Mo FPC-67 filed
Boiler capacities prorated to give plant total
des.p. coal
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:197]
STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
SHSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Philadelphia SMSA
21. Cromby
(Philadelphia Elec. Co)
Boiler 1
Boiler 2
19. Barbadoes
(Philadelphia Elec. Co.)
Boiler 31
41
I
2
3
4
44. Landsdale
(Landsdale Elec. Dept.)
* No FPC-67.filed
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF
,o FIRING
10^2 BTU
MW % 7JT
PCFR
PCTA
3T775 72 26.08
des
66 PCFR
66 PCFR
•
RFRO
RFRO
23 . RFRO
T5T~ 59 10.12
des.
25.5 27 0.73
des.
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
COAL OIL GAS
12 n ~
p. coal oil
— g- -jg- -ft-
p. coal oil • gas
94 4 -
.s p. coal
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
*
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL REFUSE
YEAR OF COMBUSTION
OPERATION "CAPACITY"
tnns/dav
MCAX/E 98.5 coal 1954
55 oil
MCAX/E 95 coal
50 oil
MCAX/E 90 coal
50 oil
MCAX/E SO coal
50 oil
-
-
* *
1955
1949
1949
'
1923
1 7bi?
1923
1923
1923
1110
1 1 1 U
180
160
60
30
I 'TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCI
miles
10
10
10
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION TOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
RATED LOAD fNERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR ROW.
Philadelphia SHSA-Cont'd
<:o. southward
(Philadelphia Electric Co )
Boiler 11 '
12
21
22
AREA TOTAL
3*5- 70 204-
-3fififlL2_* 205.35
1 TYPE
OF
FIRING
tfU
rr
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
des
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100
100
100
100
Too" ~ —
.p. coal oil
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
MCAX/E 91.4
MCAX/E 91.4
MCAX/E 92.7
MCAX/E 92.7
INITIAL REFUSI
YEAR OF COMBU!
OPERATION "CAPAt
tons/c
1947
1947
1948
1948
.TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
10
1120
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
SMSA-COUHTr/PLAKT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQKT.
1012 BTU
NW % yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. *
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
miles
tons/day
Reading SHSA
6.
11 38.
Titus
(Metropolitan Edison)
Boiler 1
y
Eyler*
3
1 (HetropoHtan Edison)
r> Boiler 1
7
AREA TOTAL
HI 1 kes-Barre-Haz.l eton
42
Hunlock
SHSA
75
75
75
525 7J T4"7S9~
42
42
84 13 "TT26
309 . 16.15
United Gas Improvement
Boiler 1
3
5
2
4
K
5J 53 679T
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCOP
PCOP
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
98 2
des. p. coal
67 33
des. oil
99 1
des. s. p. coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Wet
Wet
Wet
E
E
E
E
E
C
C
96.7
96.7
96.7
76.8(t)
78.4(t)
90
85
1951
1951
1953
1941
1941
1925
1925
1925
1947
1947
1959
210 <5
210
210
35 <5
35 S
20 5
20
20
45
45
145
* Boilers 3-8 were retired 1n 1971. These were Identical coal-fired bollers(OSTO) with a capa, ;ty of 62MW. and were all built in W3-1924.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:1971
STATE:PENNSYLVANIA
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMf. OF
SMSl-COWt/PlANT iflttlTO ""^
MW % W
mikes Barre-Hazleton SHSA-Cont'c
15. Stanton
(Pennsylvania Power & Light)
Boiler 1-1
1-2
1<%
-3
r"~*
£3*"** • « M
^* 1-4
OSTO
50 OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
X^^^
21
-1
2-2 -
2-3
2" A
-H
OSTO
OSTO
k
50 OSTO
OSTO
•^
3 46 ' PCOP
nras~ 41 ~or
AREA TOTAL 239 15.23
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
100
iod
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
Too"
des'. Sip 120
1953 HO
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
MW
vr
TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM
OF DISTRIBUTION ASH
FIRING BY BTU X HANDLING
COAL OIL GAS
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. %
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
PITTSBURGH SMSA
1. Colfax
Dusquesne Lgt. Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 '
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
60*
262.5 16
9.40
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
des
None
Cycl. 80(t)
Cycl.
E
Cycl.
82
83
81
t,
t
t
E 78
Cycl. 63
Cycl. 70
Cycl. 85
1921
1920
1921
1921
1921
1920
1921
1920
1923
1922
1923
1922
1924
1922
1924
1924
1927
1925
1927
1925
1927
1925
410
* Cold Reserve, not Included 1n plant total
coal
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
SHSA-CQUNTY/PLWT
RATED
CAPACITY
KM
LOAD
FACTOR
%
ENERGY
RQNT.
1012 BTU
vr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
A«w**«r .
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
•s, »-
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
-***..-
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
QJ»EBATIQN
REFUSE
COMBUSTION •
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
PITTSBURGH SMSA
3. Phillips
(Dusquesne Lgt. Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
8. Sevwrd -Indiana Co.
(Penn. Electric Co.)
Boiler 9~
12
14
15
17. Homer City-Indiana Co.
(Penn.Elec.Co.)
Boiler 1
2
58
24.69
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
100
100
100
' 100
100
100
_
.
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
TOO
des.p.coal
26O 63
Rear
fired
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
97 3
des.p.coal oil
659.7
659.7
1519.4
37
4T26"
PCOP
PCOP
98~~
des.p.
2
coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
C
C
C
C
C
C
90
90
90
90
90
92
98
97
98
94.5
94.5
1942
1942
1949
1950
1950
1956
20
1050
1942
1942
1950
1957
40
1969
1969
685
925
925
30
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
HW
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY
RQHT.
1012 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
COAL OIL
GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
YEAR:
STATE:
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
1971
PENNSYLVANIA
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
Pittsburgh SHSA - Cont'd
2. Elrama
Duquesne Lgt. Co.
' Boiler 1
2
3
4
510.3 64
30.86
PCFR 100 -
PCFR 100 -
PCFR 100 -
PCFR 100 -
100 - - •
des.p.coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
ooo o
92
92
92
92
1952
1953
1954
1960
15
1304
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
If EAR:
STATE:
1971
PENNSYLVANIA
RATED
CAPACITY
LOAD
FACTOR
SMSA-COUNTY/PLAHT
ENERGY
RQMT.
IP12 BTU
TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR Of
FIRING BYBTU-X'1 flRROLING " OPERATION
COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. %
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
miles
tons/day
PITTSBURGH SMSA - Cont'd
34. Reed
(Dusquesne Lgt. Co.)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7. Chesvrtck
Duquesne Lgt. Co.
Boiler 1
28. SpHngdale
(.West Penn power Co.}
2
4
6
77
88
T36~~ 35
565.3 59
10.37
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
OSTO
100
TOO
100
100
100
100
100
des
-
.p. coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
27.87
PCTA
37
17.25
99 1
des.p.coal
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
100
TOO
100
100
TOO
100
des.
-
-
-
.
-
-
p. coal
-
-
-
-
-
—
None
Dry
Wet
Wet
Wet
Dry
Dry
1930
1938
1930
1938
1930
1941
99
81
70
82
83
81.6
1970
440
1175
1937
1937
1938
1945
1954
270
175
285
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
PENNSYLVANIA
SMSA-COUNTY/PUWT
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY
RQHT.
1Q12 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. «
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
Pittsburgh SMSA - Cont'd
11. New Castle- Lawrence Co.
Perm Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
42.5
42.5
103
105
132.8
47578
49
22.35
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
100 -
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
E
I
t
98
98
98
95
98
1939
1947
1952
1953
1964
90
90
220
225
285
40
des.p.coal
32. Armstrong- Armstrong Co.
West Penn Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
32574* 70
PCOP
PCOP
100
100
TOO-
des.p.coal
Dry
Dry
MCAX/E 96
MCAX/E 96
1947
1948
35
955
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
PENNSYLVANIA
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
"
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR ROMT. OF
FIRING
101Z BTU
—W * yr~ COAL OIL
BOTTOM
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
PITTSBURGH SHSA- Cont'd
GAS
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COJffiUSTIQM
"CAPACITY"
TYPE EFF. X
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
33. Mitchell
West Penn Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
33
64 ~26TT3
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCTA
100
100
100
100
100
r
-
-
-
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
des.p.coal
E 92
E 92
E 92
E 92
1948
1948
1949
1963
15
1125
36. Hatflelds Ferry- Greene Co.
West Penn Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
576
576
576
T728~ 38
1O5
PCOP 100
PCOP 100
PCOP 100
100 -
des.p.coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
E 95
E 87
E 90
1969 795
1970 795
1971 795
40
-------
SMSA-COWNTY/PLANT
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
10'' BTU
MW I tr COAL OIL GAS
Pittsburgh SHSA-Con'*.
31.
^v
~V
Keystone - Armstrong Co.
(Penn. Power 8 Light)
Boiler 1
. 2
18; . Conemaugh
(Penn Power ft Light}
Boiler 1
Z.
AREA TOTAL "
936 PCTA
936 PCTA
HBTl 50 80.46 99 1
des. p. coal
842 PCTA
HA9 PCTA
1684 51 70.06 98 2
des. p. coal.
1M17.9 460.51
YEAR:
STATE:
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. *
Wet E 99.5
Wet E 99.5
Dry E 94
Dry E 94
1971
PENNSYLVANIA
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1967
1968
1970
1971
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
1720
1720
1480
1480
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
25
40
-------
YEAR: 1971
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT 1012 BTU "^ ' '* "" * ^^^ °PERATI°N "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
MM X XT COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. % tons/day m11es
Franklin County
43. Chambersburg
(Chambersburg Elec. Dept.) 19.1 43 0.86 52 - 48 * * * 35 5
des. p. coal and gas
Harrisburg 48
AREA TOTAL 19.1 Q.86
* No F.PC-67 filed
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
SMSA-COUNTY/PLAMT
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
MM X W
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE . TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
miles
TYPE EFF. % tons/day
Unlon-Snyder-Montour-
wortnumDeriano counties
16. Sunbury
(Penn. Power & Light)
Boiler 1 (A,B)
2 (A.B)
3
4
AREA TOTAL
mo
103.5
156.3
45O
409.8
69
5T735"
31.35
PCOP 100
PCOP 100
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
100 -
des. p. coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
91
91
93
93(t)
1949
1949
1951
1953
335
510
10
Harrisburg 4
Wilkes-Barre
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: PENNSYLVANIA
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
— ^-Mn^^WB.
York SMSA
12.
AREA TOTAL
— — — __ — _
Brunner Island
Boiler 1
2
RATH*
CAPACITY
MW
J03.3
405.0
790.4
1558.7
1558 7
LOA& ENERGY
FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
J vr~
62 84765"
84.08
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
100
100
100
des
-
«
• P-
OIL GAS
-
—
coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. t
Dry E 97(t)
Dry E . 99
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1961
1965
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
830
930
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
15
-------
RHODE ISLAND
ROVIDENCE-PAWTUCKET-WARWICK
«INT
LEGEND
® Places ol 100.000 or more inhabitants
• Placn ol SO.OOO lo 100.000 inhabitants
O Places ol 25,000 lo SO.OOO inhibitarlj outiide SMSA'j
SUndard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas ISMSA's)
271
-------
Providence-Pawtucket-
Warwick SMSA
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
AREA
Rhode
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
Island, 1971 - "Coal
(b)
ENERGY AREA
RQMT. POP.
1012 BTU millions
yr
Plants"
106
Only
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
tons 10^2 BTU
yr yr
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b%)
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
145.9
10.6
0.781
0.51
4.62
43.4
10
Data includes South Street Plant only; capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel).
* Does not differentiate between types of firing—assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Rhode Island, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants - Identical to table above.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER SFNFRATTnM
YEAR: 1971
STATE: RHODE ISLAND
RATED
CAPACITY
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
• MW
Providence - Paw tucket
-Warwick SMSA
South Street
(Narragansett Elec. Co.)
Boiler 121
122
15
17
22
24
33
r 3*
<
V. 35
36
(. 110
Boilers
1n
. range
2-13 MW
!45.9
ARPA TflTAl
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQMT. OF
FIRING
10'2 BTU
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
— X vr MAI nn e«c
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO
RFRO • '
TOP
FIRED '
TOP
FIRED '
TOP '
FIRED '
TOP
FIRED •
44 10.64
des.
coal
100
100
'100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
TOTT ~
P.
oil
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TVPF FFF «
MCAX/E 86/30 W
MCAX/E 86/90(d)
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
INITIAL REFUSE
YEAR OF COMBUSTION
OPERATION "CAPACITY"
tons/ day
1953 •» ~
1953 T257
1916 >
1917
1918
1918
1925
1925
1925
1925
Boiler
> capacities
from
5 to 30
tons/day
J
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
10
-------
10
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
-
NASHVILLE-DAVIDSON
~~jfli^HB~~
li***i*\J
'JOHNSON Cirr
> /
I OUTUNOOO ,•} ;
CHATTANOOGA
O 19 2O » «0 X> «l-l
LEGEND
® Places of 100.000 or more inhabitants
O Places of 25,000 to 50.000 inhabitants outs«J* SMSA's
a Standard Metropolitan
Statistical Areas (SMSA's)
10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Tennessee, 1971 - "Coal Plants" Only
AREA
Knoxville SMSA
(incl. Roane and Loudon
Counties)
Memphis SMSA
Nashville-Davidson SMSA
Benton-Humphreys Counties
Rhea County
Sullivan-Hawkins Counties
TENNESSEE STATE TOTALS
Includes all plants capable*
attached data sheets.
(b)
RATED ENERGY
CAPACITY RQMT.
MW _10BTU
2650
990
1255.2
1485.2
240.0
823.3
7443.7
of burning
* Does not differentiate between types
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
GENERATION
iu-yr
131.2
43.9
61.1
65.3
1.8
36.9
340.5
coal (design
(a) POTENTIAL TYPICAL
AREA REFUSE ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
POP. GENERATION FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
millions .,,-tons lnl,BTU (a/b %}
IDo-yTT- Wvr miles
0.471
0.782
0.553
0.026
0.017
0.163
2.010
fuel and/or
of firing — assumes all
0.30
0.51
0.36
0.01
0.01
0.09
1.31
current fuel ) .
types capable of
2.79 2.1
4.63 10.5
3.27 5.3
0.13 0.2
0.09 4.9
0.87 2.4
12.52 3.7
Includes all plants in
refuse burning.
18
<5
25
10
< 5
34
Tennessee, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants - Identical to above table
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Tennessee
RATED
CAPACITY
SNSA-COUNTY/PLANT
MW
Rhea County
8. Watts Bar
TVA
Boiler A 60
B 60
C 60
k ° 60
AREATOTAl, ^
Memphis SMSA
1. Allen
TVA
Boiler 1 330
* 330
3 330
990
AREA TOTAL 990
LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
FACTOR RQKT. OF DISTRIBUTION
,, FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
* yr COAL OIL GAS
* 100 - -
* 100
* . 100
* 100
10 1.86 TOO -
des.p.coal
* P-coal multiple intertube
1 pe
CYCL
CYCL
CYCL
St 43.92 59 . 4J —
des.coal gas
43.92
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. X
Wet & E 95
Dry
Wet & E 95
Dry
vertical firing
Wet E 70
Wet E 98.7(t)
Wet E 98.7
WUIAL .REFUSE, ... TyPIC
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTA
tons/day mn<»c
1969 25 <5
1969 25
1969 25
I969 25 Chattanooga
1958 620 <5
1959 620
1959 620
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Tennessee
SMSA-COUNTY/PLAKT
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY
RQHT.
1012 BTU
y
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
Sullivan-Hawkins Counties
6. Sevler
(TVA)
Boiler 1 *
2
* 3
* 4
*.
. AREA TOTAL
Nashville-Davidson SMSA
3. Gal latin
(TVA)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
AREA TOTAL
205.8
205.8
205.8
205.8
823.3
1255.2
1255.2
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
53 36T96*
36.96
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
60 6T7T7
61.17
100
100 -
100
100
100
des.p.coal
100
100 -
100
100 -
100
des.p.coal
-
.
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA 50
MCTA 50
MCTA 50
MCTA 50
1955 385
1955 385
1956 385
1957 385
34
Knoxville 60
Asheville, NC
MCTA/E 60/92
MCTA/E 60/92
MCTA/E 40/90
MCTA/E 40/90
1956
1957
1959
1959
25
3810
* Boiler capacities prorated to give plant total.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POKER GENERATION
YEAR: ,971
STATE: Tennessee
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Benton-Humphreys Counties
5. Johnsonvllle A S B
(TVA)
Boiler Al **
A2
A3
A4
r AS
< A6
>
B7 **
B8
B9
BIO
-
AREA TOTAI
KnoxvUle SMSA f R0ane and Loudon Co.
2. Bull run
(TVA)
Boiler 1
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
132 3
132i3
132.3
132.3
132.3
132.3
793.8
172 8
1 / fc • O
172.8
172.8
172.8
69172"
1485.2
osn
WAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
1012 BTU
* vr COAL OIL GAS
PCTA 100 ' -
PCTA 100 -
PCTA 100 -
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
PCTA 100
Too -
des.p.coal
* 100 -
* 100 -
* 100 -
* 100
luo - . -
des.p.coal
49 65.31
ei xz cc
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
TYPE
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
EFF. X
56(t)
60(t)
60
60
60
60
81
81
81
81
IKITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
1951
1951
1952
1952
T952
1953
1958
1959
1959
1959
tons/day miles
245 10
245
245
245
245 Nashville 60
325
325
325
325
PCTA 100
des.p.coal
Dry
81
1967
1955
15
* P. coal forced draft, circular, horizontal
** Boiler capacities prorated & give plant
-------
REFUSE COHBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: Tennessee
RATED LOAD ENERGY
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT.
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT 10^ BTU
VU X ^f~
KnoxvUle SMSA-Roane and Loudon Counties conf n
4. Kingston
(TVA)
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
** 7
3&. 1
TO 60 SBTBT
AREA TOTAL 2fi5Q 731. 2a
TYPE
OF
FIRING
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
100 -
100 ' -
100
100
100 -
100 -
100
100 -
100
loo
des.p.coal
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF X
MCTA/E 60/80
MCTA/E 60/80
MCTA/E 60/80
MCTA/E 60/80
MCTA/E 50/85
MCTA/E 50/85
MCTA/E 50/85
MCTA/E 50/85
MCTA/E 50/85
INITIAL REFUSE
YEAR OF COHBUSTION
OPERATION "CAPACITY"
tons/day
1954
1954
1954
1954
1954
1955
1955
1955
1955
3650
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
m-i I/**-
nil ies
20
-------
10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
NEWPORT NEWS
HAMPTON
NORFOLK-
kPCRTSf.10UTH J
®
•
D
O
LEGEND
Places of 100,000 or more inhabitants
Places of 50.000 to 100.COO inhabitants
Central cities of SMSVs w,tn fewer than 50,000 inhabitants
Places of 25,000 to 50.COO inhabitants outvde
Standard MeiropoMan
Statistical Areas
12 13 U 15
16 17 18 19 2\ 22 23
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
ro
oo
Virginia, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants
AREA
Newport News -Hampton SMSA
Norfolk-Portsmouth SMSA
Ri chmond-Petersburg-Col onial
Heights SMSA's
Warren County
Fluvanna County
Pittsylvania County
Giles County
Russell County
VIRGINIA STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
375.0
749.6
1586.9
34.5
284.3
29
402.5
712.5
4174.3
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
18.8
35.3
79.8
1.7
13.6
1.9
20.5
45.9
217.7
AREA
POP.
millions
0.296
0.684
0.660
0.016
0.008
0.060
0.017
0.025
1.766
10 6
0.19
0.44
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.01
1.15
(a)
' REFUSE
GENERATION
tons 10IZ BTU
3L yr
1.75
4.04
3.90
0.09
0.04
0.32
0.09
0.13
10.36
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b %)
9.3
11.4
4.9
5.3
0.3
16.2
0.4
0.3
4.8
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
mi 1 es
15
15
5
5
<5
<5
<5
5
Includes all plants detailed on attached data sheets.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Virginia, 1971 - "Coal Plants" Only
oo
to
AREA
Newport News-Hampton SMSA
Norfolk-Portsmouth SMSA
Ri chmond- Petersburg-Col oni al
Heights SMSA's
Warren County
Fluvanna County
Pittsylvania County
Giles County
Russell County
VIRGINIA STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
375.0
749.6
1586.9
34.5
284.3
29
402.5
712.5
4174.3
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
in!2BTU
10 yr
}8.8
35.3
79.8
1.7
13.6'
1.9
20.5
45.9
217.7
AREA
POP.
millions
0.296
0.684
0.660
0.016
0 .008
0.060
0.017
0.025
1.766
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
fitons _i?BTU
106 yr
0.19
0.44
0.43
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.01
0.01
1.15
i 11 i w •
IU yr
1.75
4.04
3.90
0.09
0.04
0.32
0.09
0.13
10.36
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b %)
9.3
11.4
4.9
5.3
0.3
16.2
0.4
0.3
4.8
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
15
15
5
5
<5
<5
<5
5
Ir;ludes all plants capable* of burning coal (design fuel and/or current fuel). Includes all plants in
attached data sheets.
* Does not differentiate between types of firing -- assumes all types capable of refuse burning.
-------
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
,, FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
_'*. * vr COAL OIL MS
Russell County
8. Clinch River
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
VEAR: 1971
STATE:VIRGINIA
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
OPERATION "CAPACITY" | DISTANCE
TYPE FFP * tnnc/rfau _ji .
Appalachla Power Company
Boiler
1 *
2
3
AREA TOTAL
Plttsylvanla
L 12. Brantly
County
Danville Water.
Boiler
Gas & Electric
1
2
3
-
AREA TOTAL
237.5
237.5
237.5
7TO
712.5
6
11.5
-1H-
29
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
81 45.90
45.9
PCR/GFRO
PCFR/GFRO
PCFR/SFRO
70 1.97
1.97
100
100
100 ' -
100
des p coal
31 69
des p coal oil gas
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
85
85
85
84
84.7
84.7
1958
1958
1961
1949
1952
1953
650
650
650
15
30
30
5
Kingsport, Tenn
<5
Roanoke 52
Lynchburg 56
* Boiler capacities prorated to plant total.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: VIRGINIA
SJiSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
HW
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY .
RQKT.
yr~
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
mi 1 es
R1chmond-Petersburg-
Colonial Heights SMSA's (conjoined)
9. Chesterfield
Virginia Electric & Power Co.
Boiler 1 62.
2 69
3 112.
4 187.
5 359
6 693,
11. Richmond-]2th St.
Virginia Electric & Power Co.
Boiler 17 52.5
T8 50
10275"
AREA TOTAL ,
1586.9
79757
O6
79.87
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
PCTA
17 S3
des p
Dry
Dry
•Dry
Dry
Dry
Cry
HECH
E
C
E
£
£
80
72
72
72
72
72
1944
1949
1952
1960
1964
1%9
140
155
250
420
810
1565
oil
Wet
Wet
96 4^
des p coal
90
90
T936
1939
20
20
Warren County
6. Riverton
Potomac Edison Co. of Virginia
Boiler 1 34,5
AREA TOTAL
34.5
39
1.71
1.71
PCFR 100
des.p. coal
Dry
HCAK 80
1949
70
Charlottesville 65
Washington 60
5
-------
RATED
CAPACITY
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANt
Fluvanna County
2. Bremo
Virginia Electric & Power Co.
Boiler 1 15
2 15
3 69
4 185.3
28473
AREA TOTAL 284 3
Giles County
7. Glen Lyn
Appalachia Power Co.
Boiler 5
6
8
9
10 -
12
11
13
51
52
6
AREA TOTAL
•fefe.4
• in.f
22S .
402.5
402.5
LOAD ENERGY
FACTOR RQMT.
1012 BTU
52
M FOR POWER GENERATION
TYPE CURRENT FUEL
OF DISTRIBUTION
ru
COAL OIL GAS
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
YEAR: 1971
^TATf-Virvrln-t:.
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
Wet
Wet
Dry
Dry
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL YEAR OF
• OPERATION
TYPE EFF. *
Went
MCAX 70
MCAX 70
1931
1931
1950
1958
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day miles
25
25
135
370
<5
Richmond 45
Lynchbura 52
13.6
59
20.53
20.53
OSTO
PCFR
PCTA
PCTA
PCFR
97 3
des p,s coal
None
None
None
None
None
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
None
None
None
None
None
No-ie
None
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
C
_
-
-
-
-
_
—
85C«0
8560
85 C<«)
95 (A)
1922
1922
1922
1923
1923
1923
1928
1931
1944
1944
1957
<5
140
/ 20
490
Roanoke 50
-------
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
. Norfolk-Portsmouth SMSA
3. Portsmouth
Virginia Electric & Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
»
0
v.
10. Reeves Avenue
Virginia Electric & Power Co.
Boiler 21
22
AREA TOTAL
Newport News-Hampton SMSA
5. York town
V1r.9]?1a Electric & Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
REFUSE
COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. QF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
101* BTU
-•**. * vr COAL OIL GAS
112.5
112.5
185.2
239.4
649.6 57
50.0
50.0
inn n ,,
749.6
187.5
187.5
375.0 56
375
PCTA
PCTA
PCFR
PCTA
33.75 10 90
des. p coal oil
PCTA
PCTA
TT60 96-4
35 35 des p coal
PCTA
PCTA
i-. .._ .
18. 8b 100
in or CS P C0a 9«S
YEAR: 1971
STATE -VIRGINIA
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. « tnns/ftov ...-i —
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Wet
Wet
Dry
Dry
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
E
E
E
C
MCAX
65
65
65
70
70
70
98
84
1953
1954
1959
1962
1941
1947
1957
1958
245
245
405
525
35
35
400
400
mi ie»
15
15
15
-------
LEGEND
• PI«C» «f 50.000 to 100.0OO inhjfi.tintj
O Ctntril cihn of SMSA's with lr*e> than SO.000 inhibiti
O Piters «: 2S.OOO (o 50.000 .ohjBrtmti outside SMS* •.
Standard Metropolitan
Sijt*!-cai Areas |£MSA's)
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
AREA
Charleston SMSA
Monongal ia-Pres ton-Taylor-
Harrison-Marion Counties
Tucker-Grant Counties
Pleasants County
Mason County
WEST VIRGINIA STATE TOTALS
Includes all plants capable*
attached data sheets.
West Virginia, 1971 -
(b)
RATED ENERGY
CAPACITY RQMT.
MU RTII
Pin _ «T oD 1 1*
1529.2
1605.1
1140.5
215.0
1105.6
5595.4
of burning
* Does not differentiate between types
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
GENERATION
\Qlt-yr
Z3,3
96.4
68.9
15.7
62.1
316.8!
coal (design
of firing --
"Coal fired Plants" Only
(a) POTENTIAL TYPICAL
AREA REFUSE ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
POP. GENERATION FROM REFUSE DISTANCE
millions lnrtons . .--.oBTU (a/b %)
100 yr
0.231
0.238
0.016
0.007
0.024
0.516
fuel and/or
assumes all
0.15
0.14
0.00
0.00
0-01
0.32
current fuel ) .
types capable of
iu"-yr miles
1.37 1.9 12
1.27 1.3 15
0.08 0.1 10
0.03 0.2 <5
0.12 0.2 15
2.89 0.9
Includes all plants in
refuse burning.
West Virginia 1971 - All Foss'il Fuel Plants - Identical to table above.
**
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR TOMER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: WEST VIRGINIA
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POi I ifTTmi
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CoK
rrntu* ntf BTII » UUniKUL
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT 1012 BTU FIRING BY BTU * HANDLING
— — — ^ * vr~ COAL OIL GAS
Charleston SMSA
z. uaoin creek
Appalachla Power Company
Boiler 1 OSTO DRY
3 . * OSTO DRY
*
I OSTO DRY
I n£S5 DRY
l * J PCFR DRY
» 81 ** PCFR DRY
«J 8Z PCFR DRY
91 pCFR DRY
92 PCFR DRY
273.5 33 9.22 99 1 -
des.s A p coal
3. Kanawha River
Appalachla Power Company a „„
Boiler 1 JI9.7 PCF« DKY
2 - 219.7 PCFR D*Y
41O" ~84 59^65 100
des.p.coal
TYPE
GRAV/
SCTA
GRAV/
SCTA
GRAV
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
MCAX
E
p
EFF. X
15
15
15
85
85
85
85
85
85
95
95
INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
OPERATION "CAPACITY" .DISTANCE
rQnc f t\A V m4 1 n v.
/ **QJ' HIl IPS
192? 15
1927
1929
1931
1931
1942
1942
1943
1943
390
1953 630
1953 ic
3 630 15
7.
Amos
Appalachian Power Company
Boiler 1
AREA TOTAL
816.3 53 34.49 *** PCOP 93 2
J52SL2 73.36
DRY
95.3
1971
1470
* Boilers on deactivated reserve.
** Boiler capacity breakdown not available
*** This plant was started up In 1971. The actual load factor for this year was 24X.
state load factor (53%) for calculation purposes.
The energy requirement is based on the average
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: HEST VIRGINIA
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU t
SHSA-COUNTY/PUHT 10^2 BTU
MM X vr~ COAL OIL GAS
Mason County
12.
fleasants
6.
v>
<^
Thilip Sporn
Appalachia Power Company
Boiler 1 }
1 r
5 450
TT05T6 69
AREA TOTAL 1105.6
County
" Willow Island
Monongalia Power Company
Boiler 1
. ~2T5 78
AREA TOTAL 215
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCOP
SOO ~9l~ I"
K.10 des.p.coal
PCFR 100
CYCL 100 - -
T5777 TOO ~
15.77 des.p.coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. X
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
DRY
WET
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
E
MCAX
E
79.3(t)
85 (t)
85 (t)
65.1(t)
70.4{t)
59
73
INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR Of COMBUSTION TRANS.
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day miles
1950 \ 15
1950
1951 1555
1952 J
1960 1070
1949 <5
1960
665
No breakdown available.
-------
KEFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER figNCRATrnN
YEAR:
STATE:
1971
WEST VIRGINIA
«IE5r«. LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
__
Mononaalia-Preston-Taylor-Harrl son-
Marion Counties
8. Fort Martin
Monongalia Power Company
Boiler 1
2
y 4. Albright
C-A Monongalia Power Company
-^ Boiler 1
"^•v. 2
3'
.
MM
576
576
TT52
69
}209.3
J
Z78.3
., FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
^ vr Cf)Ai nti
PCTA 100
PCOP 100
69 63.29 TOO ~
des.p.coal
PCFR 100
PCFR 100
__ ^ PCTA 100 -
^3 2TT4T TOO ~
des.p.coal
/•AC
6A5
— ^—
—
.
-^-
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. %
DRY
DRY
99.4
99
DRY MCAX 83
DRY MCAX 83
DRY C 93
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS
"CAPACITY" .DISTANCE
tons/day niles
1967
1968
1345
1345
15
1952
1952
1952
250
) 680
25
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER fiENERATrON
YEAR:" 1971
STATE: WEST VIRGINIA
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Monongal ia-Preston-Taylor-Harri son-
Marion Counties cont'd
5. Rivesville
Monongal i a Power Company
Boiler 5
6
^^J
j
Vs*
7
8
AREA TOTAL
Tucker-Grant Counties
1. Mt. Storm
Virginia Electric & Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
AREA TOTAL
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU %
101* BTU
MW 2 yr COAL OIL GAS
PCFR 100 -
PCFR 100
-
PCFR 100 -
PCFR 100
T7O 53 TTT72 Too ~ ~
des.p.coal
1605.1 ' 96.42
570.25 PCTA
570.25 PCTA
1140.5 70 5OO 99 ~T T
des.p.coal
1140.5 68.90
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TY
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TR
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DI
TYPE EFF. X tons/dav mi
WET SCTA/ 65 1936 <5
MULT.
FILLER
CONES
WET SCTA/ 65 1936
MULT.
FILLER
CONES
DRY SCTA/ 70 1944
IMPE
DRY SCTA/ 56 1951
IMPE .Q,
495
DRY E 85 1965 1460 10
DRY E 90 1966 1460
-------
WISCONSIN
vx
OULUTH SUPERIOR
PLANTS •
O EXISTING t
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
AppTeton-Oshkosh SMSA
(includes Manitowac and
Sheboygan Counties)
Duluth-Superior SMSA
Green Bay SMSA
La Crosse SMSA
(includes Vernon, Trempean-
leau and Buffalo Counties)
Madison SMSA
(includes Columbia and
Rock Counties)
Milwaukee SMSA
Ashland County
Grant Couhty-Richland County
Marathon County-Wood County
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
575.2
25.2
392.5
603.4
554.9
2725.4
82.2
293.3
176.5
Wisconsin, 1971 - All Fossil Fuel Plants
(b) (a)
ENERGY AREA REFUSE
RQMT. POP. GENERATION
1012 BTU 106 tons 1012 BTU
yr millions yr yr
24.4
1.7
23.1
26.7
30.7
113.0
4.8
15.1
8.2
0.463
0.270
0.159
0.145
0.473
1.429
0.017
0.148
0.165
Q.30
0.17
o.io.
0.09
0.31
0.93
0.01
0.08
0.09;
2.73
1.60
0.94
0.8E
2.79
8.45
0.09
0.79
0.88
POTENTIAL TYPICAL
ENERGY SUPPLY TRANS.
FROM REFUSE " DISTANCE
(a/b %) miles
11.2
89.4
4.1
3.2
9.1
7.5
1.9
5.2
10.7
45
5
<5
32
25
9
<5
10
5
WISCONSIN STATE TOTALS
5428.6
248.0
3.269
2.12
19.14
7.7
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
Wisconsin, 1971 - Coal Plants
AREA
Appleton-Oshkosh SMSA
(includes Manitowac and
Sheboygan Counties)
Duluth-Superior SMSA
Green Bay SMSA
La Crosse SMSA
(includes Vernon, Trempean-
leau and Buffalo Counties)
Madison SMSA
(includes Columbia and
Rock Counties)
Milwaukee SMSA
Ashland County
Grant County-Richland County
Marathon County-Wood County
WISCONSIN STATE TOTALS
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
575.2
25.2
392.5
603.4
554.9
.
2310. 3
82.2
293.3
176.5
5081 .S
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
24.4
1.7
23.1
26.7
30.7
101.6
4.8
15.1
8.2
237.3
AREA
POP.
millions
0.463
0.270
0.159
0.145
0.473
1.429
0.017
0.148
0.165
3.269
106
0.30
0.17
0.10
0.09
0.31
0.93
0.01
0-08
Q.09
2.12
Only*
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
tons 1QT2 BTU
yr yr
2.73
1.60
0.94
0.85
2.79
8.45
0.09
0.79
0.88
19.14
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b %)
11.2
89.4
4.1
3.2
9-1
8.3
1.9
5.2
10.7
8.1
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
45
5
32
25
10
<5
10
5
*Includes all plants in the Data Tables except 20, 24.
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GEHERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: WISCONSIN
SHSA-CQUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE , TYPIPAI
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANs L
lft1?DT1, FIRING BYBTU* HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
10" BTU
HW % yr COAL OIL GAS TYPE EFF. 1 tons/day M
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR PQUER GENERATION
YEAR: J977
STATE: WISCONSIN
ro
vo
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
— 1
RATED
CAPACITY
HU
LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
1012 BTU
* vr COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE FPF *
GREEN BAY SHSA
13. Pulliam
Wisconsin Public Service
LA
1.
15.
18.
19.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
AREA TOTAL
CROSSE SMSA
French Island
Northern States Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
Alma
Dairyland Power Coop.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
New Genoa
Dairyland Power Coop.
Boiler 1
Edison
Northern States Power Co.
in
1 U
10
30
30
50
62.2
75
125
39275
392.5
12.5
~237o
U^
. %i
17.3
17.3
54.4
81.6
T8779
384
384
6.5
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
60 23710
23.10
SPRE
ii TO "«
PCFR
PCFR
PCFPx
PCFR
67 TT54
55 T4T50
.005 0.003
100
des. p. coal/oil/gas
100
100
loo
des.s-coal
100
100 -
100
100
100 - -
Too - -
des. p. coal
$91 .
des. p. coal
100
des. s. coal
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Wet
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
*
None
None
E 92
E 89.9
E 90
E 87.9
E 96.3
E 92
CYCL 86.5
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
MCTA
E 88
* *
INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tnnc/rfav U* 1 «.*.
1927
1927
1943
1947
1949
1951
1958
1964
1940
1948
1947
1947
1950
1957
1959
1969
20
20
70
- 70
120
150
185
310
15
15
40
40
40
140
210
690
<5
<5"
5b
Id
10
AREA TOTAL
603.4
26.77
* Ho FPC 67 filed
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: WISCONSIN
ro
\o
co
SMSA-COdNTY/PLANT
MADISOH SM3A
3. Blount Street
Kadi sort Gas & Electric Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
11
5
5
7
e
9
11. Rock River (Rock Co.)
Wisconsin Power i Light
Boiler 1
2
RATED LOAD
CAPACITY FACTOR
NU X
5
5
21
7.5
21
21
27
44
44
T9TT 54
79.7
79.7
T59T? 61
ENERGY TYPE
RQKT. OF
FIRING
io12 BH
yr
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
RFRO/
GFRO
PCFR
PCFR/
GFRO
PCFR/
GFRO
PCFR/
GFRO
PCFR/
GFRO
TTT4
CYCL
CYCL
~O9~
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU *
COAL OIL GAS
31 - 69
des.s. coal /gas
100 -
100
100
des.p.coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION
ASH CONTROL
HANDLING
TYPE EFF. I
None
None
None
None
Wet
Wet
Dry
Dry
Dry
Wet
Wet
None
None
None
None
CYCL
CYCL
CYCL
CYCL
CYCL
E
E
-
.
85
85
85
85
85
99.6
99.6
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
1968
1968
1963
1964
1938
1943
1949
1957
1961
1954
1955
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS.
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day HUes
10 <5
10
50
15
50
50
60
105
105
190 3+
190
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: WISCONSIN
NO
SO
SKSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING BY BTU X
101* BTU
HW X yr COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. t tons/day Mil«
MADISON SMSA - cont'd
9.
26.
Black Hawk (Rock Co.)
Wisconsin Power & Light
' Boiler 3
Rock River
Wisconsin Power & Light
Boiler 1 1
21
J
AREA TOTAL
25
25
~50 50
150
T30 61
554.9
PCFR
PCFR/
GFRO
2.73 6-94
des. p. coal/gas
CYCL 100 -
CYCL 100 -
8.35 100
des.p.coal
30.71
Dry
Dry
Wet
Wet
SCTA 80
SCTA 80
None
None
1947
1949
1954
1955
55 40
55
40
350
MILWAUKEE SMSA
6.
North Oak Creek
Wisconsin Electric Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
.
120
120
130
130
500 42
100 -
* 100 -
100
100
18.97 100
des.p.coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E 90
E 90
E 93
E 92
1953
1954
1955
1957
190 lo
190
205 '
205
* Front Wall Vertical Downward
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
1971
STATE: WISCONSIN
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
»!
LOAD
FACTOR
X
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
TYPE
OF
FIRING
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
TYPE EFF. X
INITIAL
YEAR OF
OPERATION
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day
' TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
Miles
MILWAUKEE SHSA - conf d
7. South Oak Creek
Wisconsin Electric Power Co.
Boiler 5
6
7
8
25. Valley
Wisconsin Electric Power Co.
Bciler 1
2
3
4
280.3
280.3
316.0
316.0
1192.6
68
63
58
_63
272'
54
53.18
yy
des
1 . -
.p. coal
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
E
E
E
E
45
50
92
92
1959
1961
1955
1967
47
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
PCFR
13.17
99 - 1
des.p.coal/gas
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
96
96
97
97
1S-68
1958
1969
1969
530
530
600
600
140
140
140
140
<5
* Front Mall Vertical Downward
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Milwaukee SHSA cont'd
8. Port Washington
Wisconsin Electric Power Co.
Boiler 1
2
3
4
5
20. Commerce Street
Wisconsin Electric Power Co.
Boiler 1
21. East Wells Street
Wisconsin Electric
Power Company
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE
CAPACITY FACTOR RQWT. OF
1012 BTU
MW * vF
80
80
80 **
80
80 J
400 39 . 16.03
35 50 2.28
15 21 0.31 *
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
COAL OIL GAS
100
100 -
100 --.
100 - -
100
"100
des. p. coal
- • 6 94
des. oil/gas
100
des s & p coal
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
Dry
None
*
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL YEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE EFF. %
E 98.8 1935
E 99.1 1943
E 99.2 1948
E 99.1 1949
E 99.0 1950
None
* *
REFUSE TYPICAL
COMBUSTION TRANS
"CAPACITY" DISTANCE
teas/day miles
135 Z5
135
135
135
135
70 <5
10 <5
* No FPC-67 filed
** Front wall fired vertical downward
-------
FOR
GlNtRM
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQMT. OF DISTRIBUTION
SKSA-COUNTY/PLANT 1012 BTU FIRING BY BTU *
— — — MW x ^F- COAL OIL GAS
MILWAUKEE SMSA - cont'd
24. Lakeside
vmconstn ETtctrlc Power Co.
f°1lar ' \ GOPP/
2
3
4
5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
* ft
18
t n
19
o/i
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
L ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GOPP/
ROPP
GFRO/
RFRO
GFRO/
RFRO
GFRO/
RFRO
20 / GFRO/
RFRO
37O 21 "Off - 3l 91
des. o11/gas
AREA TOTAL 2725.4 m.02
BOTTOM
ASH
AIR POLLUTION
CONTROL
HANDLING
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
TYPE EFF. %
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
V/UIY.J1N
INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
YEAR OF COMBUSTION TRANS
OPERATION "CAPACITY" DISTANCE
tons/day Mil PS
1920 5
1920
1920
1920
1921
1921
1921
1921
1923
19.23
1923
1923
1924
1924
1924
1924
1926
1929
1930
1930
380
complete plant header sy*ten
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: WISCONSIN
SHSA-COU«TY/PLANT
RATED
CAPACITY
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQKT. OF
FIRING
1012 BTU
X vr~
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU X
COAL OIL GAS
BOTTOM
ASH
HANDLING
AIR POLLUTION INITIAL
CONTROL YEAR OF
OPERATION
TYPE EFF. X
REFUSE
COMBUSTION
"CAPACITY"
tons/day. „
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
; Miles
MARATHON COUNTY-WOOD COUNTY
14.
28.
Weston
Meston Public Service
Boiler 1
2
Wlldwood
Harshfield Electric & Water Dept.
AREA TOTAL
60
75
T3570"
41.5
176.5
PCFR
PCFR/
GFRO
61 T33F
37 0.24 *
8.23
61 - -39
des. p. coal/gas
100
Wet
Wet
*
E 99.6 1954
E 99.2 1960
* *
150
185
60
15
Appleton 85
* Ho FPC 67 filed
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POMER 6ENERATION
YEAR: 1971
STATE: WISCONSIN
SMSA-COUHTY/PLANT
Ashland County
2. Bay Front
take Superior District
Power Company
AREA TOTAL
Grant County-Rich! and County
12. Nelson Dewey
Wisconsin Power and Light
Boiler 1
2
16. Stoneman
Da fry land Power Corp.
Boiler 1
2
*No FPC-67 filed.
u
O.
RATED LOAD ENERGY TYPE CURRENT FUEL
CAPACITY FACTOR RQHT. OF DISTRIBUTION
FIRING SY BTU *
1012 BTU
m % vr COAL OIL 6AS
82.2 49 4.83 * 59-41
des s. coal /gas
82.2 4.83
119.4 CYCL 100
116.6 CYCL 100
227.2 65 12.48 100 -
des p. coal
17.3 100
34.5 100
5TT1J 45 OT 100
des. p. coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL REFUSE TYPICAL
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION; TRANS.
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY": DISTANCE
TYPE EFF. X tons/day miles
* * * 1917 205 <5
Dulutii 60
Wet None - 1960 280 >0
Wet None - 1962 270
C 30 10
. C 65
-------
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
YEAR:1971
STATE: Wisconsin
SMSA-COUNTY/PLANT
Grant County - Richland County cont'd
29. Richland Center
Richland Center Municipal
Utility
AREA TOTAL
RATED
CAPACITY
MM
d
14.3
LOAD ENERGY TYPE
FACTOR RQMT. OF
,, FIRING
1012 BTU
X W
18 0.24 ' *
CURRENT FUEL
DISTRIBUTION
BY BTU %
COAL OIL GAS
100
des s. coal
BOTTOM AIR POLLUTION INITIAL .REFUSE c
ASH CONTROL YEAR OF COMBUSTION
HANDLING OPERATION "CAPACITY"
TYPE EFF. X tons/day
« * * 10
TYPICAL
TRANS.
DISTANCE
miles
-------
DATA FOR 1975
Note; Calculations of energy requirements in the
1975 tables are based on 1971 average load factors
and heat rates.
306
-------
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
J-: REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER
^ ALL FOSSIL FUEL PLANTS
ALABAMA
CALIFORNIA
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE (Wilmington)
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
KANSAS (Kansas City)
KENTUCKY
MAINE(Portland)
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA (Mpls.-St.Paul)
MISSOURI
NEBRASKA (Omaha)
NEW HAMPSHIRE (Manchester)
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
OHIO
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND (Providence-
Pawtucket, Warwick)
TENNESSEE
VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
RATED
CAPACITY
MW
9560.3
22509.6
3881.3
827.5
17134.65
10068.0
16428.3
12239.7
2395.8
11653.2
213.6
7216.3
7157.7
13372.0
2048.8
11873.7
794.2
638.0
6297.8
19434.2
11462.0
28364.4
22681.3
145.9
10043.7
5019.3
10583.3
5955.6
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
458.2
919.6
210.7
53.5
738.1
516.8
887.8
630.6
91.3
581.3
14.5
481.0
385.2
757.3
106.8
547.7
39.2.
36.3
319.1
921.4
703.0
1399.9
1152.9.
10.6
459.4.
261.8
599.3
272.8
AREA
POP.
Millions
1.82
16.82
2.63
0.55
6.09
2.37
9.43
3.76
1.38
1.48
0.21
5.68
6.29
6.89
1.99
4.62
0.58
0.40
4.84
17.33
1.69
9.89
11.11
0.82
2.22
1.85
0.54
3.47
GENERATION
197? '
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
106 tons
yr
1.29
11.97
1.87
0.39
4.32
1.66
6.68
2.64
0.98
1.03
0.14
4.04
4.47
4.87
1.42
3.29
0.41
0.28
3.46
12.34
1.16
6.95
7.8&
0.58
1.57
1.31
0.36
2.45
1012 BTU
1 U —
yr
U66
t\J\J
107.75
16.89
3.53
38.91
IS 01
*~J • VI J.
60.12
» V • ^*v
23.78
8.84
9.35
1 34
i • J*T
36 LI
-JV* •*TAi
40 29
™ ** • fc^
&3 QD
**j . y\j
12.80
20 fil
-------
SUMMARY OF RESULTS
REFUSE COMBUSTION FOR POWER GENERATION
COAL-BURNING PLANTS ONLYr
ALABAMA
CALIFORNIA
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE (Wilmington)
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
KANSAS (Kansas City)
KENTUCKY
MAINE(Portland)
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA (Mpls.-St.Paul )
MISSOURI
NEBRASKA (Omaha)
NEW HAMPSHIRE (Manchester)
NEW JERSEY
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
OHIO
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND (Providence-
Pawtucket, Warwick)
TENNESSEE
VIRGINIA
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
RATED
CAPACITY
ft« i
MW
956Qo3
-
3002.0
827.5
5449.7
9662.0
16228.3
12239.7
2262.8
11653.2
-
5541.3
3533.3
11875.5
2018.8
11366.5
774.2
638.0
5194.9
10134.5
11462.0
28145,1
21555.9
145.9
10043.7
4174.3
10583.3
5609.8
(b)
ENERGY
RQMT.
1012 BTU
yr
458.2
-
164.5
53.5
187 aO
497.4'
877.0
630.6
89.3
581.3
-
369.4
188.2
676.0
106.1
532.6
38.9
36.3
263.8
503.9
703 00
1263.6
1093.7
10.6
459.4
217.7
599.3
262.6
AREA
POP.
Millions
1.82
16.82
2.63
0.55
6.09
2.37
9.43
3.76
1.38
1.48
0021
5.68
6.29
6.89
1.99
4.62
0.58
0.40
4.84
17.33
1.69
9089
11.11
0.82
2.22
1.85
0.54
3.47
?1975
(a)
REFUSE
GENERATION
1n6 tons -ml 2 BTU
yr
1.29
11.97
1.87
0,39
4.32
1.66.
6.68
2.64
0.98
1.03
0.14
4.04
4.47
4.87
1.42
3.29'
0,41
0.28
3.46
12.34
1,16
6.95
7.88
0.58
1.57
1.31
0.36
2.45.
i v i.
yr
-11.66
107 75
•*• *•/ / o / *J
16.89
3.53
38.91
15.01
60.12
j-\ 70
£. -J . / O
8.84
9 35
-X O '-'•J
1.34
36.42
40.29
43.90
12.80
29.61
3 70
•J 0 / V
2.57
31.15
111.08
10.47
62=58
V it. o ^ \J
70.97
5 27
•J • *. /
14,15
11.80
3 29
-^ o *• ?
22.08
POTENTIAL
ENERGY SUPPLY
FROM REFUSE
(a/b%)
2 5
*• « *t
10.3 -
6 6
Vow
3.0
6.9
0 Q
J 0 O
9.9- (also
i fi
I. oO
9.9 "
•J 0 J
21.4 -
6 S
w « -/
12.1 ^
S (\
-/ ,o
9C
0 J
7.1
/ o J-
11.8 "
22.0 -
1,5
6^5
AQ 5 —
3 1
J o i
S L
Jet
0 5
VJ e J
8.4
Mo. total)
TOTALS:
211419.7
10775.6
125.37
88.93'
800.45
7.4
-------
PROBABLE NEW PLANTS - 1972 TO 1975
(Excluding Nuclear)
ALABAMA
6. Gaston 5 (Alabama Power Co.)
11. Gorgas 10 (Alabama Power Co.)
TOTAL
Generating Cap.
MW
910
788.8
1698.8
Fuel Type Year
p. coal
p. coal
p. coal
1974
1972
CALIFORNIA
15.
22.
22.
16,
16.
26.
Scattergood 3 (L.A. Dept. of Water
& Power)
Huntington Beach 6 (So. Cal. Edison)
Huntington Beach 7 (So. Cal. Edison)
Encina 4 (San Diego Gas & Electric)
Encina 5 (San Diego Gas & Electric)
Ormond Beach 2 (So. Cal. Edison)
TOTAL
309
750
790
287
297
750
3183
gas
oil/gas
oil/gas
oil/gas
oil/gas
oil/gas
oil & gas
1974
1973
1975
1973
CONNECTICUT
4. Middleton 4 (Hartford Electric Light
Co.) 400
9. Cokeworks 1 (United Illuminating Co.) 445
TOTAL 845
oil
oil
oil
1973
1975
FLORIDA
43. Port Manatee 1 (Florida Power & Light)
14. Sanford 4 (Florida Power & Light)
14. Sanford 5 (Florida Power & Light)
30. Andota 1 (Florida Power Corp.)
30. Anclota 2 (Florida Power Corp.)
32. Ft. Fierce-King 8 (Ft. Pierce Munic.)
31. Municipal 4 (Vero Beach Municipal)
25. Northside 2 (Jacksonville Municipal)
33. Indian River 3 (Orlando Util. Comm.)
34. Big Bend 2 (Tampa Electric)
34. Big Bend 3 (Tampa Electric)
17. Crist 7 (Gulf Power Company)
TOTAL
301
1376
3435
WT
oil 1975
oil 1972
Oil 1973
011 1974
Oil 1975
oil/gas 1974
oil/gas 1975
oil 1972
oil/gas 1973
coal 1973
coal 1975
coal/oil 1973
coal plants
oil & gas
-------
Generating Cap.
Fuel Type Year
GEORGIA
9. Port Wentworth 4 (Savannah Electric
& Power Company)
10. Bowen 2 (Georgia Power Company)
10. Bowen 3 (Georgia Power Company)
10. Bowen 4 (Georgia Power Company)
11. Yates 6 (Georgia Power Company)
11. Yates 7 (Georgia Power Company)
13. Effingham (Savannah Electric & Power
Company)
TOTAL
ILLINOIS
Meredosia (Central 111. Public Serv.
Powerton 5 (Commonwealth Edison)
Powerton 6 (Commonwealth Edison)
Baldwin 2 (Illinois Power Company)
Baldwin 3 (Illinois Power Company)
Dallman 2 (Springfield Water, Light
& Power Dept.)
(Central Illinois P.C.)
(Central Illinois P.S.C.)
TOTAL
6.
11.
11.
29.
29.
18.
1. Edwards 3
3. Coffeen 2
120
806
880
880
350
350
175
3266
295
35FT
200
840
840
600
600
80
350
600
3910
200
4TTtT
oil/gas 1972
coal 1972
coal 1974
coal 1975
coal 1974
coal 1974
ojj 1975
coal plants
oil & gas
oil 1975
coal 1972
coal 1975
coal 1973
coal 1975
coal 1972
coal 1972
p. coal 1972
coal plants
oil
INDIANA
19. Lawton Park (Bd. of Public Works,
Fort .Wayne) 20
9. Stout 7 (Indianapolis Power & Light) 450
20. Kankakee 14 (No. Ind. Public Service) 520
13. Michigan City 12, No. 5 (No. Ind. Pub-
lic Service) 520
21. Gibson 1 ftjblic Service of Indiana) 650
14. Cayuga 2 Public Service of Indiana) 500
22. Culley 3 So. Ind. Gas & Electric) 250
10. Whietwater Valley (Richmond Municipal
Lighting & Power) 60
TOTAL 2970
coal
coal 1973
coal 1975
coal 1973
coal 1975
p. coal 1973
coal 1973
coal 1973
coal plants
310
-------
Generating Cap. Fuel Type Year
KENTUCKY
11. Coleman 3 (Big River Rural Elec. Coop) 170 p. coal 972
13. Ghent 1 (Ky. Utility Company) 511 coa 973
14. Millcreek 1 (Louisville Gas & Elec, 355 coa 972
14, Millcreek 2 (Louisville Gas ^OecJ 330 coa 1974
15. Elmer Smith MOwensboro Municipal) 265 coal 1973
16. Station 2 No.l (Henderson) 85 coa 973
No.2 (Henderson) 185 coal , 1973
TOTAL 2001 coal plants
MARYLAND
4. Wagner 4 (Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co.) 415 oil 1972
13. Chalk Point 3 (Potomac Elec. Power 630 01 1974
13. Chalk Point 4 (Potomac Elec. Power) 630 pJJ_ 1975
TOTAL 1675 oil
MASSACHUSETTS
12. Salem Harbor 4 (New Eng. Power Co.) 437 oil 1972
2. Mystic 7 (Boston Edison) 600 01 975
5. Canal 2 (Canal Electric Company) 560 oil 1975
11. Brayton Point 4 (New Eng. Elec.
Power Company) 465 oil 1975
13. Cleary 2 (Taunton Municipal) 90 °11 1973
TOTAL 2152 oil
MICHIGAN
2. Karn 3 (Consumer Power Company) 660 oil 1974
2. Karn 4 (Consumer Power Company) 660 oil 1975
18. Monroe 2 (Detroit Edison) 800 coa 973
18. Monroe 3 (Detroit Edison) 800 coa 973
18. Monroe 4 (Detroit Edison 800 coal 1974
21. Erickson 1 (Lansing Bd. of Water &
Light) !60 coal 1972
14. Presque Isle 5 (Upper Peninsula
Generating Co.) 85 coal 1974
14. Presque Isle 6 (Upper Peninsula
Generating Co.) 85 coal 1974
TOTAL 2730 coal plants
1320 oil
4~0~5lT
311
-------
Generating Cap.
Fuel Type Year
MISSOURI
15. Labadie 3 (Union Electric Company) 580
15. Labadie 4 (Union Electric Company) 600
10. Rush Island 1 (Union Electric Co.) 600
16. New Madrid (Assoc. Elec. Coop) 600
TOTAL 2380
coal 1972?
p. coal 1973^
coal 1975
coal 1972
coal plants
NEW JERSEY
16. Linden 4 (Public Service Elec. & Gas
Company)
1. England 3 (Atlantic City ElecJ
13.
93.
160
Gilbert Street 4, 5, 6(Qen. Public Util.) 330
TOTAL
583.5
oil
oil
oil/gas
oil & gas
1972
19741
1974>
NEW YORK
14
24
24
32
Northport 3 (Long Island Lighting)
Bowline 1 (Orange & Rockland Util.)
Bowline 2 (Orange & Rockland Util.)
Roseton 1 (Central Hudson Gas & Elec.
Corp.)
32. Roseton 2 (Central Hudson Gas & Elec.
Corp.)
5. Astoria 6 (Con Edison)
23. Oswego 5 (Niag. Mohawk)
TOTAL
387
621
600
600
600
800
850
••OTIMBB^W
4458
oil
oil/gas
oil
oil
oil
oil/gas-
oil
oil & gas
1972
197£
1974?
1972J
NORTH CAROLINA
5. Sutton 3 (Carolina Power & Light)
9$ C-11f side 5s-(Duke Power Company)
4i Roxboro 3 (Carolina Power & Light)
12. Belews Creek 1 (Duke Power Company)
12,. Belews Creek 2 (Duke Power Company)
TOTAL,
3998
p. cpal/pW 19721
p, coalv 1972;
coal
312
-------
Generating Cap. Fuel Type Year
OHIO
5. Eastlake 5 (Cleveland Elec. Ilium. Co.) 680
24. Conesville 4 (Columbus & So. Ohio) 800
26. Gen. Gavin 1 (Ohio Power Company) 1300
26. Gen. Gavin 2 (Ohio Power Company) 1300
45. Painesville (Painesville Municipal) 25
27. Shelby 6 (Shelby Municipal) 12.5
28. Miami Fort 7 (Cincinnati Gas & Elec.
Company) 550
25. Stuart 3 (Columbus & So. Ohio Elec.
Company) 610
25. Stuart 4 (Columbus & So. Ohio Elec.
Company) 610
Stuart 5 (Dayton Power & Light) 580
TOTAL 6467.5
p. coal 1972
coal 1973
coal 1974
coal 1975
oil/coal 1974
coal 1973
coal 1975
p. coal 1972
p. coal 1974
coal 1974
coal plants
PENNSYLVANIA
14. Martins Creek 3 (Penn. Power & Light)
35. Montour 1 (Penn. Power & Light)
35. Montour 2 (Penn. Power & Light)
23. Eddystone 3 (Philadelphia Elec. Co.)
23. Eddystone 4 (Philadelphia Elec. Co.)
29. Mansfield 1 (Ohio Edison)
TOTAL
800
790
750
400
400
880
3220
800
1975
1972
1973
1974
1975
1975
coal plants
oil
TENNESSEE
7. Cumberland! (TVA)
7. Cumberland 2 (TVA)
TOTAL
1300
1300
2600
1972
1973
coal plants
VIRGINIA
5. Yorktown 3 (Va. Elec. & Power Co.)
TOTAL
oil
oil
1974
313
-------
Generating Cap. Fuel Type Year
WEST VIRGINIA
7. Amos 2 (Ohio Power Company) 816.3 coal 1972
7. Amos 3 (Ohio Power Company) 1632.6 coal 1973
9. Harrison 1 (Monongalia Power Co.) 684 coal 1972
9. Harrison 2 (Monongalia Power Co.) 650 coal 1973
9. Harrison 3 (Monongalia Power Co.) 650 coal 1975
10. Mt. Storm 3 (Va. Electric & Power Co.) 555 coal 1973
TOTAL 4987.9 coal plants
WISCONSIN
17. Columbia 1 (Wise. Power & Light) 527 coal 1975
TOTAL 527 . . , •
527 coal plants
314
-------
APPENDIX I
ASPECT OF WASTE COMBUSTION OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THIS STUDY
The following factors will have the most significant impact on a
utility's decision on whether to burn waste as a supplementary fuel.
While the data presented in this report are intended to assist in selecting
potentially promising situations, a detailed evaluation of these factors
is outside the scope of this study:
1. Capital Investments
Cost of modifying the boiler itself
Cost of ancillary equipment for receiving refuse, handling, shredding,
metal removal, etc.
Cost of additional air pollution control equipment
2. Operating Costs
Cost of waste gathering and transportation
Cost of shredding and other waste processing operations
Cost of transfer of fuel to firing point
Cost of disposal of noncombustible material
Cost of incremental ash disposal
3. Feasibility of Boiler Modification
Apart from the cost itself, there may be physical problems associated
with the modification of any particular boiler (age of equipment, for
example).
4. Technical Reliability
All utilities are concerned with keeping their power generating equip-
ment in operating condition. Corrosion of boiler tubes, for example, can
315
-------
be caused by burning any fuel and can require that equipment be taken out
of service so that repairs can be made. All utilities are concerned about
corrosion. Some utilities are apprehensive to the extent that they do not
want to expose their boiler to the possible additional risk attributed to
burning solid waste. Other utilities are not apprehensive about the cor-
rosion potential of burning solid waste.
5. Load Factor of Boiler
Modifying a peakload unit would mean that fuel storage and firing
equipment would have to be large, capable of disposing of the daily solid
waste load in a short time. This would involve a higher capital cost for
fuel storage and firing than the modification of a baseload boiler, in which
the solid waste could be burned over a longer period of time.
6. Introduction of Nuclear Plants
The introduction of nuclear generating capacity in a system will cause
the fossil fuel plants to be cut back somewhat; i.e., their load factor will
fall. This then has the same effect as described in item 5 above.
7. Fuel Ridffij and Electricity Rate Structure
The utility company may have to pass any fuel savings through to the
customer if solid waste were to be a significantly cheaper fuel. There
would therefore be no direct economic incentive to pursue the concept of
using waste as supplementary fuel.
8. Marketability of Fly Ash After Introduction of Solid Waste Fuel
9. Ash Disposal Site
While benefits will be gained from the reduction in landfill disposal
requirements for the raw garbage, there must be available means to dispose
of the ash generated from the waste-derived fuel.
316
-------
10. Public Relations
Because a utility is concerned with public approval of rate increases
and new plant sites and is aware of its public service role, it may consider
solid waste as a fuel in order to achieve a favorable image with the public
as a good corporate citizen.
12. Air Pollution
Air emission tests have been conducted at only one location: the Union
Electric Company's Meramec Plant, where solid waste is burned with coal as
part of EPA's energy recovery demonstration grant to the City of St. Louis.
Based on those tests, conducted in late 1973, it appears that:
1. Particulate emissions increase slightly when solid waste
is fired with coal, probably because of decreases in the
efficiency of the electrostatic precipitation (ESP). There
was no discernable change in particulate particle size or
resistivity. Decrease in ESP performance may result from
increases in gas velocity and changes in ESP electrical
conditions (spark rate).
2. Gaseous emissions (sulfur oxides, nitrogen oxides, hydrogen
chloride, and mercury vapor) are not significantly affected
by combined firing of waste and coal.
3. Uncontrolled particulate emissions per cubic foot of exhaust
gas are not changed by combined firing; however, total uncon-
trolled particulate emission do increase because of increases
in the gas flowrate.
4. Additional air pollution testing is required to complete the
characterization of particulate emissions resulting from combined
firing.
317
-------
Additional tests were conducted late in 1974. The tdst results will
be available in the Spring, 1975. If preliminary indications of inct'ellBi
particulate emissions are confirmed, an increase in the capacity of the
pollution control devices will be required.
318
-------
APPENDIX II
DETAILS OF HOW THE WORK WAS DONE
The work performed for this study may be divided into a number of
discrete parts:
A. Plant Locations and Capacities
Information for plants existing in 1971 was obtained from National
1 2
Coal Association and Federal Power Commission (FPC) publications. '
3 4
For projected plants, two surveys were consulted. '
For data on individual boilers, FPC form 67 or the annual summaries
derived from the form were used. The 1969 survey as reported in the
original form 67's, filed by the utility companies with the FPC in
Washington, D.C., was used most frequently.
In some cases, the individual boiler capacities from form 67 did not
add to give the total plant capacity as quoted in the other references.
Where the discrepancy represented less than 5 percent of the plant capacity,
the boiler figures were prorated to the total plant figure; these changes
are noted in the detailed data tables.
B. Energy Requirements
Load factors, net electricity generation (KWH), and plant heat rates
2
(Btu per KWH) for 1971 were obtained from FPC data. Data is given on a
plant basis and no breakdown was obtained for individual boilers. In some
cases, plant heat rates were not reported; statewide averages were used in
such cases. In some plants, new units were started up in 1971, giving rise
to unrealistically low load factors for that year. Again, statewide average
factors were used to compute a more representative plant energy requirement
319
-------
with which to relate refuse combustion energy. Use of State averages is
noted in the detailed data tables.
For the 1975 calculations of energy requirements, the 1971 average load
factors and heat rates were used for each State in the absence of other infor-
mation.
C. Fuel Distribution
The distribution of fuels within plants for 1971, by Btu supplied, was
obtained on a percentage basis from National Coal Association data. The
same source was used to establish the plant design fuels.
D. Equipment Details
Boiler-by-boiler data on type of firing, bottom and fly ash handling
equipment and operability was obtained from the relevant FPC form 67.
Figures for the efficiency of air pollution control equipment refer to
performance when burning coal during average operating conditions unless
marked (t), for test conditions, or (d), for design calculations. "NR"
indicates data .was not reported in FPC 67 nor supplied by the utilities
themselves.
A key to abbreviations is given in the section "Presentation of Results"
and a number of terms are defined in the glossary, Appendix III.
E. Data Confirmation by Utility Companies
Sections A, B, C, and D above explain how most of the boiler data was
gathered. When data had been assembled in a consistent format, all the
utility companies were contacted for verification. According to the Edison
Electric Institute who assisted in the confirmation, no changes have been
requested by the companies to date. Any changes subsequently notified will
be published as an addendum.
320
-------
F. Waste Generation Areas
For the States under study, all the power plants were narked on maps
showing SMSA's and counties. Each State was then split into "waste genera-
tion areas" according to the distribution of plants, with the emphasis on
matching plants to the most populated areas, as represented by SMSA's. In
some cases, counties adjacent to SMSA's were included in the "areas"; in
other cases, plants outside SMSA's were matched to the county in which they
were situated.
The boundaries of the "waste generation areas," within which solid
waste is assumed most likely to be transported to the power plants, were thus
drawn without formal investigation to define possible transportation methods
and routes to those plants, nor was consideration given in this study to the
optimum economic distance from the plants.
The maps presented with the study results indicate plant locations and
the "waste generation areas" for which population data was developed.
G. Population Estimates
The basic data for most of the population figures was obtained from a
report by EPA and HUD, Population and Economic Activity in the U.S. and
Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas.6 were those for 1970 (actual)
and as predicted for 1975 based on a fertility rate C. It was decided
to amend the predictions to the lower rate E (12 percent lower than C in
the year 2000) by multiplying the prediction figures for 1975 by 0.997, a
number obtained by interpolating data in the above report comparing growth
rates based on C and E.
Having assembled population figures for each SMSA for 1970 and 1975, the
figures for 1971 were obtained by linear interpolation between 1970 and 1975.
321
-------
Since a number of the waste generation calculations require inclusion
of counties outside the SMSA's, county population figures from the 1970
Census were obtained.'' Estimates for 1971 and 1975 were made by using the
growth rates for adjacent SMSA's which were deduced from the figures already
calculated.
H. Waste Generation and Energy Content
The following figures were used to calculate the quantity of raw refuse
generated in eadh year and the corresponding potential energy obtainable by
combustion:^
Waste Generation (Ib/person/day) 1971 1975
SMSA's/urbanized areas 3.60 3.91
Counties (assumed same as national average) 3.25 3.53 '
Solid waste heating value, Btu/lb 4,500 4,500
I. Typical Transportation Distances
For each "waste generation area," the center of population was estimated
on the maps. This point was deemed the center of waste generation. Distances
from there to each plant in the area were determined and are recorded as
typical transportation distances in the plant data tabulations. Where more
than one plant Was located in an area, a weighted average of the distances
was used as the typical transportation distance for the area, and these dis-
tances were recorded In the State summary tables. The averages were weighted
according to the plant energy requirements, on the assumption that solid waste
would be distributed to the plants according to their fuel demand. In practice
this may not take place since all waste may be sent to one particular plant
for processing. The distances reported in this study are therefore intended
only as a general guide.
322
-------
For many plants, distances from major urban centers outside the immediate
area are also quoted for informational purposes since it may prove desirable
to arrange rail or barge transportation from the most populated areas to
l
certain distant plants which are particularly suitable for utilizing solid
waste combustion.
J. Boiler Capacity for Solid Waste Combustion
It is probable that at least 10 percent of the fuel used by any boiler
could in principal be replaced by solid waste, provided the necessary ash-
handling equipment were available and operable. A column is included in the
data tables which presents the energy requirement of each boiler in terms of
the equivalent tonnage of waste, assuming (1) 10 percent replacement of fuel
by solid waste and (2) the average plant heat rate and load factor apply to
each boiler in the plant.
These figures were calculated using the nomograph described earlier in
this report. It was decided to perform the calculations for all boilers,
with or without the necessary ash-handling equipment, to Indicate the
potential waste-burning capacity of those boilers that might be converted
to handle refuse if economic conditions were favorable. The quantities
calculated were rounded to the nearest 5 tons per day.
323
-------
APPENDIX III
DEVELOPMENT OF THE NOMOGRAPH
The nomograph Is based on the following steps:
A. Define MW as unit (plant or boiler) capacity, in megawatts
PC as the unit load factor, in percent
H as the unit heat rate, in Btu/KWH
B. The unit daily energy requirement is (1,000 • MW • PC • H ' 24) Btu/day
100
C. Assume the refuse-burning capability of the unit is 10 percent of
the total fuel being fired. The energy to be supplied by refuse
is thus (34 • MW • PC • H) Btu/day.
D. Assuming a heating value for refuse of 4,500 Btu/lb, the energy
is equivalent to
24 • MW • PC » H
4,500 • 2^000tons of refuse per day
E. The above quantity is essentially a "year-round" daily figure, provided
the average load factor for a long period of time is used. The equiva-
lent quantity of refuse (R) to be transported to a plant or boiler on a
"5 working days per week" basis is therefore found:
R - 24 • MW • PC • H • 1 _,,,„, 10-6x MW • PC . 'H
4,500 - 2,000 5 (3'733 * 10 > MW ' pc ' H
Tons of refuse/working day
324
-------
APPENDIX IV
GLOSSARY
Air Classifier — a device which uses a jet of air to separate light particles,
such as shredded paper and plastics, from heavy particles, such as pieces
of metal and glass. Shredded waste is dropped vertically down into a
chute, as a jet of air is blown up from the bottom of the chute. Heavy
materials drop down while the air catches the light materials and carries
them out of the top of the chute.
Baffle — a simple air pollution control device which is used to change direc-
tion of a dust-laden gas, causing the coarser particles to impinge on a
wall and drop out of suspension. Primarily used to reduce dust loading
ahead of more efficient dust collection devices.
Baghouse (fabric collector) — a simple air pollution control device utilizing ,
the principle of filtration. Dust-laden gas is passed through fabric
bags or envelopes which remove a large percentage of the dust.
Baseload boiler — a boiler that operates all the time (except for downtime
for maintenance), including evenings and winter months. Baseload
boilers are generally the most efficient boilers and are less costly
to operate than peakload boilers. (See Peakload boilers)
Boiler — equipment in which fuel is burned and the heat released by combustion
is used to raise steam. The steam is subsequently used to power turbines
driving electrical generators. A power plant may have one or several
boilers: each boiler may be used to raise steam for specific generating
equipment or several boilers may be tied into a common steam header.
Bottom ash — ash that drops to the bottom of a boiler and consists of heavy
noncombustible particles.
"Wet systems" operate where the firebox temperature is high enough to
cause particles to fuse together into a liquid slag which is tapped
from the bottom of the boiler and, after water quenching and cooling,
is subsequently removed from the plant as lumps of clinker. This system
is most frequently associated with cyclone-fired boilers.
"Dry systems" operate by dropping tfie hot ash particles directly into
bins for water quenching and removal. The particles do not reach high
enough temperatures in the boiler to fuse together.
325
-------
Btu (British Thermal Unit) — a standard unit of energy, equivalent to the
heat required to raise one pound of water by one degree Fahrenheit at
sea level. For example, the heat released by the combustion of coal
is its heating (or calorific) value and is expressed in Btu per pound
of coal.
Cyclone — an air'pollution control device, consisting of a structure without
moving parts"in which the velocity of an inlet gas stream is transformed
into a confined vortex from which centrifugal forces tend to drive the
suspended particles to the wall of the cyclone body. The particles drop
out- of the bottom of the cyclone and the gas leaves the'top.
Cyclone-fired boiler — a boiler in which combustion takes place in an adjoining
cylinder; only heated gases enter the boiler firebox itself. The com-
bustion of fuel is accomplished by inducing a swirling motion to the
fuel and air, hence the name "cyclone."
Electrostatic precipitator — an air pollution control device which removes
particles, sblid or liquid, from gaseous streams by the use of an
electric potential between electrodes. Under the influence of the
electric field, the particles in a gas become charged and move towards
the electrodes, where they are deposited.
Federal .Power Commission — a government agency with the authority to regulate'
wholesale electric rates in interstate commerce, to regulate certain
aspects of finance and accounting with respect to utility companies,
and to encourage interconnection and coordination of electricity supplies.
FPC 67 — a form ^Issued annually by the Federal Power Commission to all utility
companies operating plants with capacities exceeding 25 MW and systems*
exceeding 100 MW. When completed by the utility company, the form gives'
a comprehensive listing of equipment characteristics, air pollution
control capabilities, cooling facilities, water sources'and disposition;
etc. The 19*69 copy of FPC 67 contains all this information filled in
by the utility company but in subsequent years, only changes to the
parameters are noted. The "full" form is to be completed every 5
years.
Fluidlzed bed a bed of solid particles in which the particles are suspended1
in an upflowing stream of gas (or liquid). The particles are kept in a
constant state of motion.
F]5r .ash — ash from the fuel which leaves the boiler in the form of fine
particles which are suspended in the exit combustion gases (compare
witli "bottom ash"). Fly ash is recovered by devices suth as electro-
static precipitators.
Ftont-fired boiler — in which fuel enters from a row of firing ports along l
the1 f^ont of the boiler. Such boilers commonly have two or three chatnbersv
326
-------
Generating capacity — the maximum amount of electrical energy that can be
generated by the steam raised in the corresponding boiler or plant.
(See alsc Load factor)
Hammermill — a machine used to shred solid waste in its raw, heterogeneous
state, producing a more homogeneous material of small particle size. It
consists of a number of large hammers mounted on a horizontal shaft which
spin round and grind the solid waste against an iron grating until the
material is shredded into particles small enough to drop through the
openings in the grating.
Load factor — the ratio of the average load (amount of power) supplied during
a designated period to the maximum amount of electrical power that could
have been supplied by the plant.
Megawatt (MW) — one thousand kilowatts, a measure of the rate of energy genera-
tion or transfer.
Nomograph — a chart which may be used to perform calculations by lining up
the desired values of variables on a number of scales. Such charts are
often used to perform a large number of calculations of the same type
and can substantially reduce the working time required.
Opposed-fired boiler — similar to a front fired boiler except fuel enters from
ports in the back as well as the front.
Peakload boiler — a boiler that operates only when the demand for electric
power is high, such as during the day or during the summer. Peak-
load boilers are generally more costly to operate than baseload
boilers. (See Baseload boilers)
Plant heat rate — a measure of generating station thermal efficiency, usually
expressed as the total Btu content of fuel burned or heat released from
a nuclear reactor for the generation of 1 kilowatt hour.
Power plant— a plant generating electricity for export to consumers, consist-
ing of one or more boilers and one or more sets of generating equipment.
Pulverized coal — coal that has been ground to a fine powder to ensure
efficient combustion when "sprayed" into the combustion air and
ignited. "Pulverized coal" may be compared with "crushed coal,"
which is a term usually used to signify coal that has been broken
down into small pieces, around 1/4-inch in diameter.
Stoker-fired boiler — in which coal is introduced onto a moving grate
near the bottom of the boiler. The coal is in the form of crushed
coal or bulk coal and it burns until the pieces are small enough
to drop through the grate into the ash disposal system.
327
-------
Suspension-fired boiler — in which fuel enters and burns midway between the
top and thfe bottom of the boiler and the heavy noncombustibles fall
down into the bottom. Fuel is usually pulverized coal, oil, or gas.
Some examples of a suspension-fired boiler are cyclone-fired, front
fired, opposed-fired, and tangentially-fired boilers.
Tangentially-fiared boiler — in which fuel enters from each of the four
corners of the boiler.
Wet collector ~ ah air pollution control device in which contact of the
dus't-liltfeir gaseous stream with a liquid, specifically introduced for
such contact, is used to remove dust particles.
328
-------
REFERENCES
1. National Coal Association, Economics and Statistics Division.
Steam-electric plant factors; 1972 edition. Washington, 1972.
112 p.
2. U.S. Federal Power Commission. Steam-electric plant construction cost
and annual production expenses. Washington, U.S. Government Printing
Office, 1971.
3. New generating plants planned or under construction as of June 1, 1973.
Monograph supplement to Power Engineering, May 1973.
4. New capacity additions; a summary of electric utility construction
plans, 1973-1988. Monograph supplement to Electrical World,
June 1, 1973.
5. U.S. Federal Power Commission. Steam-electric plant air and water
quality control data for the year ended December 31, 1969,
based on FPC form no. 67; summary report. Washington, U.S. Government
Printing Office, 1973. 167 p.
6. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Housing and
Urban Development. Population and economic activity in the U.S.
and standard metropolitan statistical areas. Washington, U.S.
Government Printing Office, 1972. 543 p. (Distributed by National
Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va., as PB 216 607.)
7. U.S. Bureau of the Census. 1970 census of population. Washington,
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1971.
8. Skinner, J.H. Resource recovery: the Federal perspective. Waste Age.
5(1):12-14, 54, Jan./Feb. 1974. Reprinted, (Washington), U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1974. 3 p.
y01036
329
-------
|