Unued States Region 2 EPA/902;R-93-001 c
Environmental Protection 902 January 1993
Agency
&EPA Staten Island/New Jersey
Urban Air Toxics
Assessment Project
Report
Volume II!
Part A
Results and Discussion of the
Volatile Organic Compounds in
Ambient Air
-------
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This report is a collaborative effort of the staffs of the
Region II Office of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and
Energy, the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation, the New York State Department of Health, the
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey and the
College of Staten Island. The project was undertaken at the
request of elected officials and other representatives of Staten
Island concerned that emissions from neighboring industrial
sources might be responsible for suspected excess cancer
incidences in the area.
Other EPA offices that provided assistance included the
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, which provided
contract support and advice; and particularly the Atmospheric
Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory, which provided
contract support, quality assurance materials, and sampling and
analysis guidance, and participated in the quality assurance
testing that provided a common basis of comparison for the
volatile organic compound analyses. The Region II Office of
Policy and Management and its counterparts in the States of New
York and New Jersey processed the many grants and procurements,
and assisted in routing funding to the project where it was
needed.
The project was conceived and directed by Conrad Simon,
Director of the Air and Waste Management Division, who organized
and obtained the necessary federal funding.
Oversight of the overall project was provided by a
Management Steering Committee and oversight of specific
activities, by a Project Work Group. The members of these groups
are listed in Volume II of the report. The Project Coordinators
for EPA, Robert Kelly, Rudolph K. Kapichak, and Carol Bellizzi,
were responsible for the final preparation of this document and
for editing the materials provided by the project subcommittee
chairs. William Baker facilitated the coordinators' work.
Drs. Edward Ferrand and, later, Dr. Theo. J. Kneip, working
under contract for EPA, wrote several sections, coordinated
others, and provided a technical review of the work.
The project was made possible by the strong commitment it
received from its inception by Christopher Daggett as Regional
Administrator (RA) for EPA Region II, and by the continuing
support it received from William Muszynski as Acting RA and as
Deputy RA, and from Constantino Sidamon-Eristoff, the current RA.
The project has received considerable support from the other
-------
project organizations via the Management Steering Committee,
whose members are listed in Volume II.
ii
-------
PREFACE - DESCRIPTION OF THE STATEN ISLAND/NEW JERSEY URBAN AIR
TOXICS ASSESSMENT PROJECT REPORT
This report describes a project undertaken by the States of
New York and New Jersey and the United States Environmental
Protection Agency with the assistance of the College of Staten
Island, the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey
and, as a contractor, the New Jersey Institute of Technology.
Volume I contains the historical basis for the project and a
summary of Volumes II, III, IV, and V of the project report.
Volume II of the report lists the objectives necessary for
achieving the overall purpose of the project, the organizational
structure of the project, and the tasks and responsibilities
assigned to the participants.
Volume III of the report presents the results and discussion
of each portion of the project for ambient air. It includes
monitoring data, the emission inventory, the results of the
source identification analyses, and comparisons of the monitoring
results with the results of other studies. Volume III is divided
into Part A for volatile organic compounds, and Part B for
metals, benzo[a]pyrene (BaP), and formaldehyde. Part B includes
the quality assurance (QA) reports for the metals, BaP, and
formaldehyde.
Volume IV presents the results and discussion for the indoor
air study performed in this project. It contains the QA reports
for the indoor air study, and a paper on the method for sampling
formaldehyde.
Volume V presents the results of the detailed statistical
analysis of the VOCs data, and the exposure and health risk
analyses for the project.
Volume VI, in two parts, consists of information on air
quality in the project area prior to the SI/NJ UATAP; quality
assurance (QA) reports that supplement the QA information in
Volume III, Parts A and B; the detailed workplans and QA plans of
each of the technical subcommittees; the QA reports prepared by
the organizations that analyzed the VOC samples; descriptions of
the sampling sites; assessment of the meteorological sites; and a
paper on emissions inventory development for publicly-owned
treatment works.
The AIRS database is the resource for recovery of the daily
data for the project. The quarterly summary reports from the
sampling organizations are available on a computer diskette from
the National Technical Information Service.
iii
-------
STATED ISLAUD/WEW JERSEY
URBAN AIR TOXICS ASSESSMENT PROJECT
VOLUME III, PART A.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION OP THE VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
IN AMBIENT AIR
EPA/902/R-93-001C
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 1-1
2. QUALITY ASSURANCE 2-1
2.1 INTRODUCTION 2-2
2.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSESSMENTS AS REPORTED BY THE
INDIVIDUAL ORGANIZATIONS . , 2-2
2.2.1 Scope 2-2
2.2.2 Summary of Findings in QA Reports Submitted
by the Individual Organizations 2-3
2.3 INTER-ORGANIZATION COMPARISONS VIA CANISTER
COLLOCATIONS ....... 2-6
2.3.1 Scope 2-6
2.3.2 Caveats and Notes 2-7
2.3.3 Results - Descriptive Summary Statistics . . 2-8
2.3.4 Results of the Inter-organization
Comparisons via Canister Collocation . . . 2-9
2.3.5 Results - Analysis of Variance and LSD . . 2-11
2.3.5.1 First-year data . 2-12
2.3.5.2 Second-year data 2-12
2.3.6 Discussion . 2-13
2.4 INTER-ORGANIZATION COMPARISON VIA SHOOTOUTS . . . 2-14
2.4.1 Scope 2-14
2.4.2 Results and Discussion 2-14
2.5 MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AUDITS 2-16
2.5.1 Scope ., 2-16
2.5,2 Summary of Results 2-16
2.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT PLANS 2-17
2,7 SAMPLING SITE REPORTS 2-17
2.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY 2-17
2.9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT « 2-19
2.10 REFERENCES 2-19
Tables III-2-1 through 36 2-20
iv
-------
3. DATA MANAGEMENT 3-1
3.1 INTRODUCTION 3-1
3.2 DATA FORMATS 3-1
3.3 LOGISTICS 3-2
3.4 INITIAL DATA ANALYSIS 3-3
3.5 COMPARISON TO AMBIENT AIR VOC DATA FOR OTHER
LOCATIONS 3-6
3.5.1 Relevant Data Sets 3-6
3.5.1.1 SI/NJ UATAP (Staten Island/New
Jersey Urban Air 3-6
3.5.1.2 1988 and 1989 UATMP 3-7
3.5.1.3 ATEOS 3-8
3.5.1.4 TEAM Study 3-9
3.5.2 Inter-study Comparisons 3-10
3.6 CONCLUSIONS 3-11
3.8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 3-12
3.8 REFERENCES 3-12
Tables III-3-1 through 6 3-13
4. AMBIENT MONITORING 4-1
4.1 INTRODUCTION 4-1
4.2 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS 4-2
4.2.1 Quarterly and Annual Average Data 4-4
4.2.2 Temporal Trends in the SI/NJ UATAP Data . . 4-5
4.2.3 Spatial Trends in the SI/NJ UATAP Data ... 4-6
4.2.3.1 Dichloromethane 4-6
4.2.3.2 Trichloromethane (chloroform) .... 4-7
4.2.3.3 Tetrachloromethane (carbon
tetrachloride) 4-7
4.2.3.4 1,1,1-Trichloroethane . 4-7
4.2.3.5 Tetrachloroethene
(tetrachloroethylene,
perchloroethylene) 4-8
4.2.3.6 Hexane 4-8
4.2.3.7 Benzene 4-8
4.2.3.8 Toluene 4-9
4.2.3.9 o-Xylene 4-9
4.3 COMPARISON TO OTHER STUDIES OF AMBIENT VOC
CONCENTRATIONS 4-10
4.3.1 Dichloromethane 4-10
4.3.2 Trichloromethane 4-11
4.3.3 Tetrachloromethane 4-11
4.3.4 1,1-Dichloroethane 4-11
4.3.5 1,2-Dichloroethane 4-11
4.3.6 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 4-12
4.3.7 Trichloroethene (trichloroethylene) . . . 4-12
4.3.8 1,1,2-Trichloroethane 4-12
4.3.9 Tetrachloroethene 4-12
4.3.10 Tribromomethane (bromoform) 4-13
4.3.11 Hexane 4-13
4.3.12 Benzene 4-13
4.3.13 Toluene 4-13
-------
4.3.14 o-Xylene 4-14
4.3.15 33- and jD-Xylene 4-14
4.3.16 Ethylbenzene 4-14
4.3.17 Styrene 4-14
4.3.18 Chlorobenzene 4-15
4.3.19 o- and m-Dichlorobenzene (1,2- and 1,3-
Dichlorobenzene) 4-15
4.3.20 E-Dichlorobenzene (1,4- Dichlorobenzene) 4-15
4.4 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS FOR THE SI/NJ UATAP .... 4-15
4.5 CONCLUSIONS 4-17
4.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 4-18
4.7 REFERENCES 4-18
TABLES III-4-1 and 2 4-21
5. EMISSION INVENTORY
5.1 INTRODUCTION 5-1
5.1.1 Point Sources 5-1
5.1.2 Area Sources 5-2
5.1.3 Mobile Sources 5-2
5.1.4 Unified Data Base 5-3
5.1.4.1 Point source data base 5-3
5.1.4.2 Area and mobile source data base . . 5-3
5.1.5 Tabular and Graphic Presentation 5-4
5.2 SUBSTANCE LIST 5-4
5.3 METHODOLOGIES 5-5
5.3.1 Point Source Inventories 5-5
5.3.1.1 1988 Toxic Chemical Release
Inventory 5-6
5.3.1.2 Air Pollution Enforcement Data
System (APEDS) 5-7
5.3.1.3 Source Management System
(SMS)/BARAMIS 5-7
5.3.1.4 EPA Region II POTW inventory .... 5-8
5.3.1.5 Area sources treated as point
sources 5-9
5.3.2 Area Source Inventories 5-10
5.3.2.1 NJDEP area source emission inventory
- Area Source Emission System (ASES) . 5-11
5.3.2.2 NYSDEC area source emission
inventory - Staten Island Area Inventory
(SIAIR) 5-13
5.3.3 Mobile Source Inventories 5-13
5.3.3.1 NJDEP mobile source inventory . . . 5-13
5.3.3.2 NYSDEC mobile source inventory . . 5-15
5.3.3.3 EPA Region II mobile source
inventory 5-15
5.3.3.4 SI/NJ UATAP mobile source inventory 5-16
5.4 MICROINVENTORY 5-17
5.4.1 Introduction 5-17
5.4.2 Methodology 5-18
5.4.3 Microinventory Results 5-19
vi
-------
5.5 EMISSIONS MAPPING 5-20
5.5.1 Mapping Approach 5-20
5.5.2 Point and Area/Mobile Source Mapping . . . 5-21
5.5.2.1 Area/mobile source maps 5-21
5.5.2.2 Point source naps 5-22
5.5.3 Comparison of the Results from Different
Approaches to Estimation of Area and Mobile
Source Emissions 5-22
5.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 5-23
5.6.1 Microinventories 5-23
5.6.2 Point Source Data QA 5-23
5.6.3 Area Source Data Quality Assurance .... 5-24
5.6.4 Mobile Source Data Quality Assurance . . . 5-24
5.7 LIMITATIONS OF THE INVENTORY 5-26
5.7.1 Limitations of the Data Bases 5-26
5.7.1.1 Point sources 5-27
5.7.1.2 Area sources 5-28
5.7.1.3 Mobile sources 5-29
5.7.1.4 Comprehensiveness 5-29
5.7.1.5 Temporal variations 5-29
5.7.2 Limited Substance List 5-29
5.8 RESULTS 5-30
5.9 GENERAL SUMMARY 5-31
5.10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 5-33
5.11 REFERENCES 5-34
FIGURES III-5-1 THROUGH 4 and
TABLES III-5-1 THROUGH 3 5-37
6. SOURCE IDENTIFICATION 6-1
6.1 INTRODUCTION 6-1
6.2 POLLUTANT ROSE ANALYSIS DESCRIPTION 6-1
6.2.1 Pollutant Rose Model 6-1
6.2.2 Selection of sites and Pollutants 6-2
6.3 SOURCE IDENTIFICATION USING POLLUTANT ROSE
ANALYSIS 6-3
6.3.1 Pollutant Rose A - Benzene, Year 1 6-5
6.3.1.1 Elizabeth, south/southeast sector . . 6-5
6.3.1.2 Eltingville, north sector 6-6
6.3.1.3 Implication of mobile sources
as sources of high
concentrations at the
Elizabeth and Eltingville
monitors 6-6
6.3.2 Pollutant Rose C - Toluene, Year 1 6-7
6.3.2.1 Eltingville, north sector 6-7
6.3.2.2 Carteret, southwest sector 6-7
6.3.3 Pollutant Rose F - Dichloromethane 6-8
6.3.4 Pollutant Rose I - Trichloroethylene .... 6-9
6.3.4.1 Travis, north/northeast sectors . . . 6-9
6.3.4.2 Port Richmond, northeast sector . . 6-10
vii
-------
6.4 SURFACE TRAJECTORY ANALYSES DESCRIPTION 6-10
6.4.1 Surface Trajectory Model 6-10
6.4.2 Selection of sites, pollutants, and dates 6-11
6.5 SOURCE IDENTIFICATION USING SURFACE TRAJECTORY
ANALYSIS 6-11
6.5.1 Introduction 6-11
6.5.2 Chloroform and Carbon Tetrachloride
March 11-12, 1989 6-12
6.5.3 Toluene and Benzene 6-12
6.5.3.1 High concentrations of toluene and
benzene 6-12
6.5.3.2 Low benzene concentration 6-14
6.5.3.3 Low toluene concentration ..... 6-14
6.5.4 Tetrachloroethylene 6-14
6.5.4.1 Part A: high vs. low concentrations
selection of dates 6-15
6.5.4.2 Part B: rank order selection of
dates 6-15
6.5.4.3 Part C : peak versus valley
selection of dates 6-17
6.6 SUMMARY 6-19
6.6.1 Pollutant Rose Analysis 6-19
6.6.1.1 Aromatics 6-20
6.6.1.2 Chlorinated hydrocarbons 6-20
6.6.2 Surface Trajectory Analysis 6-20
6.7 CONCLUSIONS 6-21
6.8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT 6-22
6.9 REFERENCES ' 6-22
MAPS III-6-1 through 20 6-24
APPENDICES FOR VOLUME III, PART A
DATA MANAGEMENT APPENDICES A-2
Tables III-3-7 through 69
EMISSION INVENTORY APPENDICES A-69
Point source tables A-72
Area source tables A-108
Emission inventory Appendices A through E . A-109
POTWs A-lll
Landfills A-117
Hazardous waste TSDFs A-124
Architectural coatings, et al A-126
Mobile sources A-130
Microinventory A-141
Emission density maps and bubble maps . . . A-179
SOURCE IDENTIFICATION APPENDICES A-212
Source Identification Appendix A -
Initial pollutant rose analysis A-213
Source Identification Appendix B -
Enhanced pollutant rose analysis for roses
not discussed in section 6, and bar
charts for Pollutant Roses A through I . . A-260
Source Identification Appendix C -
Initial surface trajectory analysis . . . A-311
Source Identification Appendix D -
Surface trajectory analysis for source
identification for carbon tetrachloride . A-324
viii
-------
Source Identification Appendix E -
Relative source impact A-327
Source Identification Appendix F -
Quality assurance A-330
Source Identification Appendix G -
Summary tables for all surface trajectories
generated for perchloroethylene analysis . A-333
Source Identification Appendix H -
Surface trajectories not discussed in
section 6.5 A-334
ix
-------
1. INTRODUCTION
The Staten Island/New Jersey Urban Air Toxics Assessment
Project (SI/NJ UATAP) was conducted as a cooperative program
involving federal and state agencies, and several university
research groups. The project was initiated in response to the
concerns of the citizens of the area as expressed by their
representatives to the government agencies. The organization and
operation of the project are described in Description of the
Project, Volume II of the project report. The details of the
plans for the project are given in the subcommittee workplans and
quality assurance (QA) plans in Appendices, Volume VI of the
project report.
This volume reports the results obtained by the QA, Data
Management, Ambient Monitoring, Emission Inventory, and Modeling
and Source Identification Subcommittees. The efforts have
focused on providing an overview of the volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) portion of the data base and evaluating the data
for potential significance. Methods selected by the various
subcommittees have been applied to a selected subset of the data
to satisfy the stated objectives for the project, determine the
potential value of the results obtained, and guide efforts beyond
the scope of the SI/NJ UATAP objectives.
The data obtained by each monitoring organization were
submitted to the Data Management Subcommittee, examined for entry
errors, and then reviewed by the QA Subcommittee. The data which
met the quality assurance criteria in the QA plans were approved
for use in subsequent analyses. Simultaneously with these
activities, the Emission Inventory Subcommittee developed the
Micro and Point Source Inventories and the Modeling Subcommittee
tested methods for application to the data.
The results of an indoor air sampling program, multivariate
statistical analyses of the ambient air data, and risk
assessments using ambient and indoor air data are presented in
Volumes IV and V of the project report; and results and
discussion for the metals, benzo[a]pyrene, and formaldehyde are
presented in Volume III, Part B.
The subcommittee reports in this volume represent the
initial stages in analysis of the ambient air VOCs concentration
data. The results demonstrate the utility of the methods chosen
and reveal a number of significant relationships in the data.
This volume documents the success of the project in producing
data with sufficient accuracy and precision to fulfill the stated
objectives of the project.
1-1
-------
2. QUALITY ASSURANCE
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The Staten Island/New Jersey Urban Air Toxics Assessment
Project (SI/NJ UATAP) presented unique Quality Assurance (QA)
challenges due to the multiplicity of organizations conducting
sampling and analysis for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and
the cutting edge technology used in the monitoring effort. This
resulted in a monitoring effort conducted by organizations which
varied greatly in their experience in conducting VOC sampling and
analysis, using methods whose strengths, weaknesses, and
variability were not fully known. Although each organization was
responsible for assuring the quality of its own data, there was
still a need to ensure the consistency, comparability, and
quality of the QA efforts of the various organizations. As a
result, the QA Subcommittee implemented a Quality Assurance
program on two separate, but interlinked levels.
The first level was conducted by each of the individual
organizations and consisted of establishing and maintaining
sampling and analytical quality. This was done through the use
of good laboratory practices, including the following:
proper calibration,
use of analytical standards,
sampling and analytical blanks,
duplicate analyses,
participation in inter-laboratory sampling,
analytical comparisons, and
data review.
The second level was conducted by the QA Subcommittee and
consisted of verifying that the QA/QC procedures of each
organization were appropriate and implemented. This was achieved
by
requiring Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPjPs) of
each organization conducting sampling and analysis;
reviewing these QAPjPs;
performing QA management systems audits, coordinating and
reviewing Performance Evaluation (PE) samples for all
organizations, coordinating and reviewing the results of
multi-day collocation experiments;
reviewing monitoring data;
2-1
-------
requiring and reviewing final quality assurance reports
from each organization, and recommending and requiring
corrective action when necessary.
This section of the Report describes the results of QA
Subcommittee activity. It includes brief discussions of each of
the overall QA activities listed above. Since QA activities
conducted by the individual organizations are included in their
reports, and these reports were reviewed by the QA Subcommittee
and reported here, this section indirectly covers all QA aspects
for monitoring for volatile organics.
The complete and unabridged results and discussion of QA
activities conducted for this project can be found in Volume VI.
Presented here is an overview of these QA activities, with the
most significant and important findings addressed in some detail.
2.2 QUALITY ASSURANCE ASSESSMENTS AS REPORTED BY THE INDIVIDUAL
ORGANIZATIONS
2.2.1 Scope
QA reports based upon guidance developed by the QA
Subcommittee were submitted by the New Jersey Institute of
Technology (NJIT), the College of Staten Island (CSI), the New
York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), and
PEI, a contractor to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
In these reports, each organization presented assessments of its
data quality with respect to contamination, precision and
accuracy, history of changes and improvements in sampling and
analytical methodology; and an assessment of the variability of
the data submitted.
The need for the QA reports was especially acute in this
project for the following reasons:
1. Several of the organizations involved in the project had no
previous experience in ambient air VOC analysis.
2. The course of the project was long enough that changes in
key personnel and analytical methodologies occurred at
several organizations during the project.
3. The course of the project was long enough that equipment
problems were eventually discovered in all laboratories.
2-2
-------
The following summary of the individual organizations' QA
reports is sufficient for understanding the overall integrity of
the data. However, it is strongly recommended that any future
users of project data consult the original QA reports of the
individual organizations, and treat these reports as part of the
data. The complete QA reports are presented in Volume VI.
2.2.2 Summary of Findings in QA Reports Submitted by the
Individual Organizations
Contamination was not found to be a significant problem with
any of the organizations, with the exception of dichloromethane
in the NJIT canisters. Toluene, and to a lesser extent benzene,
were found as background in almost all sorbent based systems.
However it was determined that these background levels did not
affect the quality of the data generated. This was because
either the background concentration was very low, or blank levels
were relatively consistent. Thus, subtracting blank values from
sample concentrations provided a reliable measurement of the
concentration in the ambient air.
Accuracy of measurements by each of the organizations was
determined through the use of sorbent tubes spiked by EPA/AREAL.
Results of the analyses of these spikes showed that most
organizations wei?e capable of accuracy within ±50% of the spiked
standard concentration. This rather broad criterion for accuracy
was within the range normally seen with ambient monitoring.
Additional accuracy data confirming these results were also
presented by some organizations in their QA reports.
Precision data were obtained differently by each
organization. NYSDEC collected a duplicate sample at every
sampling event, while CSI collected duplicate samples at
approximately monthly intervals. NJIT did not perform any
duplicate monitoring, but relied instead upon the distributed-
volume samples as a measure of analytical precision. These
precision studies show that the agreement between duplicates was
generally within 10-30%. Precision was also determined through
the use of canisters collocated with the sorbent tube samplers;
the results are reported in Section 2.3.
Breakthrough, defined as incomplete sample retention, is a
predominant concern when sorbent traps are employed. Since
breakthrough is flow-dependent, it was assessed through
distributed-volume sampling, whereby results of two samplers
operating at different flow rates were compared. Differences
between samples outside the limits of laboratory precision were
ascribed to breakthrough. Every sorbent sample collected for
the project used this two-tube approach.
2-3
-------
Breakthrough for most compounds was minimal, except for
dichloromethane, where it was commonplace. Consistent
dichloromethane results, without breakthrough, were available
from NYSDEC only, where sorbent tube results were consistently in
agreement with the collocated canisters. NYSDEC's ability to
trap dichloromethane is attributable to its use of a trisorbent
consisting of Tenax, charcoal, and Ambersorb in its sorbent
tubes. Tubes used by other organizations consisted of Tenax
alone, which was ineffective for trapping dichloromethane.
For 1,1,1-trichloroethane, CSI observed a 25% difference
between the high- and low-flow distributed-volume pairs. CSI
determined that these results were most likely due to
breakthrough; the QA Subcommittee concurred. The other
organizations did not find this problem with 1,1,1-
trichloroethane .
Changes and improvements were made by all organizations over
the course of the project. This was most clearly seen with the
PEI canisters, which were used as collocation samples to assess
the variation between NJIT, NYSDEC and CSI sorbent samples.
During the first two months of the project, the PEI detection
limit was close to l ppb. As a result, only toluene was
detected. Over the next three to six months, the PEI detection
limit dropped to 0.5 ppb and toluene, benzene, xylene, and
dichloromethane were consistently detected. Nine months into the
project, the detection limit was lowered further to 0.2 ppb. As
a result, ethylbenzene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and
tetrachloroethene were commonly detected. Additional
improvements by PEI in the last three months of the project
resulted in the ability to detect carbon tetrachloride and
chloromethane at concentrations >0.2 ppb. NJIT, CSI, and NYSDEC
also showed improvements over time, as reported in the QA reports
in Volume VI.
During the extended course of this study, it was expected
that analytical problems and failures would develop. Although
major failures were avoided during the project, there were cases
in which data for specific compounds were withdrawn, invalidated,
or caveated. Specifically these are as follows:
1. All NJIT chloromethane and dichloromethane data were
invalidated. This decision is based on problems attributed
to sampler contamination, possible analytical inaccuracies,
and/or sample loss during analysis.
2. CSI dichloromethane data were invalidated. This decision is
based on collocated canister results showing that
breakthrough was occurring with CSI tubes; and CSI's high
detection limits for this compound. The latter resulted in
dichloromethane's rarely being detected in both high- and
2-4
-------
low-flow distributed-volume pairs, making the determination
of breakthrough impossible.
3. CSI data during the second and third quarters of 1989 were
accepted with some reservations as noted in the caveats
presented in Section 2.3. This decision was based upon
CSI's observation of a progressive decline in compound
concentrations found in their sorbent samples. Collocation
with PEI canisters confirmed this relative decrease in CSI's
reported concentrations. However, this decline was dramatic
only during the last five to six samples of the third
quarter, and was not observed for all compounds analyzed.
Comparison between CSI and the PEI collocated canisters on
an annual basis showed that CSI had a slight negative bias.
The magnitude of this bias relative to PEI was within the
range found for the other organizations. However, special
care must be taken if data from the third quarter of 1989
are used beyond the context of this project. Further
information can be found in Volume VI.
4. NYSDEC trichloroethylene data for the third quarter of 1989
were withdrawn due to calibration difficulties.
5. CSI and PEI hexane data from 1/88 to 4/88 were caveated.
During this period of time, PEI reported high (5-100 ppb)
levels of hexane in CSI's canister samples. This was not
seen in CSI's collocated Tenax data. However, high hexane
levels were found only in CSI's canisters and not in
canisters of other organizations analyzed by PEI at the same
time. Additionally, the high hexane levels were found in
consecutive CSI samples, eventually declining to typical
ambient levels. Although these results would be consistent
with contamination of the canister sampling train, no
definitive conclusions could be reached.
Detailed presentations of the reasons, extent, and degree of
caution necessary when using the data are found in the QA reports
in Volume VI. Additional, less significant variations in data
quality were noted by the organizations in their QA reports. The
conclusions presented here are relevant to the data uses intended
for the project. Any other use of these results should not be
attempted without consulting the QA reports in Volume VI to
ensure that the data quality objectives required for the other
use are met.
2-5
-------
2.3 INTER-ORGANIZATION COMPARISONS VIA CANISTER COLLOCATIONS
2.3.1 Scope
Sampling and analysis of VOCs for the SI/NJ UATAP were
conducted by three organizations: NYSDEC, NJIT, and CSI. Each
organization had sole jurisdiction over its sampling sites1 and
used different sampling and analytical methodologies.2 This
resulted in the isolation of the sampling/analytical
organizations from each other. In order to mitigate this
isolation and to provide a basis for statistical inter-comparison
of the results produced by the various organizations, the QA
Subcommittee developed and implemented two strategies.
The first approach was to have shootouts, events in which
all project participants gathered samples at one location for
several days.3 The resulting collocation data were analyzed to
determine the degree of comparability between organizations.
Shootout results are presented in Section 2.4, Inter-organization
Comparisons via Shootouts.
Since shootouts are labor-intensive, requiring extra
sampling equipment, analytical capacity, and monitoring personnel
not always available, shootouts were scheduled infrequently. In
addition, shootouts provide only a snapshot of an organization's
capabilities over a short period of time, rather than a long-term
assessment. The second approach, presented here, involved
routine collocation of Summa® canisters with the sorbent tubes
normally used by each organization. By assessing the collocation
results on an annual basis, comparisons between organizations
could be made. NYSDEC and CSI collected canister samples at the
rate of one canister collocation for every three tube samples
taken. Canisters were analyzed by PEI, a contractor to
EPA/AREAL. NJIT was already collocating canister and sorbent
tube samples, but in contrast to NYSDEC and CSI, was analyzing
both the sorbent tube and the canister samples. To ensure
consistent comparison of the NJIT data with that of NYSDEC and
CSI, NJIT agreed to split canister samples with PEI on a monthly
basis. Sample splitting was accomplished by having NJIT analyze
an aliquot of gas from a sample canister and then send the
canister, still filled with sampled ambient air, to PEI for
analysis. Additional NJIT collocation samples were obtained
during the second year of the study, when NJIT assumed the
See the Data Management, Section 3 of this volume, for a
full listing of site jurisdictions.
Details of sampling and analytical methodologies can be
found in the Management Systems Audits in Volume VI.
Shootout results are reported in Volume VI.
2-6
-------
responsibilities of Tenax and PEI canister sampling at the
Sewaren and Piscataway sites. The data sets used for this
section are given in the Tables III-2-26 to 36.
Statistical analysis of the collocation data was used to
determine if any significant bias was evident on an
organizational basis; an example of this would be the
determination of whether NYSDEC's benzene data were significantly
biased relative to NJIT's benzene data. Inter-site comparisons
are not presented here, since extensive statistical consultation
and specialized computer programs are required to analyze
properly the complex data set that resulted from the project's
experimental design. Further statistical analyses, including
inter-site comparisons, are included in Volume V.
2.3.2 Caveats and Notes
1. The first data year is defined as October 1987 through
September 1988, and the second data year as October 1988
through September 1989. This convention is consistent with
the annual averages reported by the Data Management
Subcommittee and submitted to the Risk Assessment
Subcommittee.
2. All calculations were made on collocated data pairs for
individual compounds.
3. Concentrations below the detection limit were deleted from
the data set, resulting in the invalidation of the
collocated data pair for the compound not detected.
4. Comparisons were made among all organizations for toluene,
benzene, m- and g-xylene, o-xylene, tetrachloroethene, and
1,1,1-trichloroethane.
5. Dichloromethane data are presented for NYSDEC only. The high
detection limits for CSI's dichloromethane data caused
computational artifacts due to the project convention of
reporting data below the detection limit as one half the
detection limit. NJIT had analytical problems with
dichloromethane that made its analysis subject to a
variation greater than an order of magnitude. As a result,
these data were withdrawn from consideration in the
collocation comparisons.
6. Trichloroethene, chloroform, and carbon tetrachloride
concentrations were almost always below the detection limit
of PEI; therefore comparison with collocated sorbent tubes
was omitted.
7. The PEI numbers for hexane in the first year of the project
are suspect. Large concentrations (>50 ppb) were reported
2-7
-------
by PEI for these samples. CSI's collocated Tenax showed
concentrations typically at 1 ppb or less, typical for all
organizations throughout the project. Additionally, these
high concentrations were only reported by PEI for a short
period of time. Subsequent collocations revealed close
agreement between PEI and CSI, as evidenced by the second
year's data. However, since there was no physical basis to
disqualify PEI's results, the data have been included in the
data tables.
8. Hexane data were not reported by NYSDEC.
9. Ethylbenzene was not reported by NJIT. NYSDEC's ethylbenzene
data for the first year of the study were drawn entirely
from the 4th quarter of that year.
10. There were insufficient NJIT tetrachloroethene data above
the detection limit in the first year of the project to
warrant inclusion.
11. PEI analysis was not a true reference or standard for any
compound. However, it does represent a valid basis for
comparison in this project. PEI analysis of collocated or
split canister samples is the only available means for
comparing the continuing performance of the individual
sampling/analysis organizations. The resulting assessments
should not be interpreted as true comparisons with a
reference or standard, but as comparisons with a consistent,
reliable point of reference.
2.3.3 Results - Descriptive Summary Statistics
This section summarizes the statistics obtained from the
comparison of collocation or split analysis of canisters analyzed
by PEI with samples analyzed by the participating organizations.
The statistics are presented in Tables III-2-1 and 2. Table III-
2-3 shows the standard deviation of collocated PEI canisters as a
measure of the precision of the PEI reference. The descriptions
below outline how the components of these tables were computed.
% of PEI: This represents the degree of agreement between
the individual organizations and the PEI reference. A value of
100% indicates total agreement. The NYSDEC and CSI results were
derived by first computing annual means for the collocated
canister and sorbent samples. Then, the annual means for the
sorbent tube concentrations were divided by the PEI canister mean
and multiplied by 100. NJIT's % of PEI results were derived by
first determining annual means for NJIT and PEI from (1) NJIT/PEI
split canister analyses, and 2) Tenax samples collocated with PEI
canisters at the Piscataway and Sewaren sites. The annual NJIT
means were then divided by the PEI annual mean and multiplied by
100.
2-8
-------
When using the % of PEI calculations to make inferences
about the data, care must be used because the variability of the
individual comparisons that make up the averages is not evident.
This variability is addressed in detail in the analysis of
variance in the next section.
Average Concentration: This represents the annual mean
concentration, in parts per billion, obtained by the individual
sampling organization (NJIT, CSI, or NYSDEC) during collocation
sampling.
Standard Deviation: This represents a measure of the
variability between the sample and the collocated PEI reference.
This statistic was generated by taking the differences between
the samples and the collocated PEI references and determining the
standard deviation of these differences.
Standard Error: This represents the standard error
associated with the standard deviation reported above. It is
obtained by dividing the standard deviation by the sample size,
and taking the square root of that result.
n: This is the number of collocated samples taken, or the
statistical sample size. This number is a function of the way
the study was constructed. For example, NYSDEC had many sampling
sites and therefore had the most collocated canister samples.
NJIT, which conducted its own canister analysis, sent only a
limited number of canisters to PEI for split analysis.
FBI Precision Analysis, Tabl* II-2-3: This represents the
standard deviation of collocated PEI canisters derived from two
separate experiments and subsequently pooled.
2.3.4 Results of the Inter-oraanization Comparisons via Canister
Collocation
Tables III-2-1 and 2 show several clear and consistent
patterns when comparing NJIT, CSI, and NYSDEC to the collocated
PEI reference. In almost all cases, the results of the
organizations were within ± 50 of the PEI reference, with the
important exceptions noted below. The differences relative to
the PEI reference were greater in the first year of the project
than in the second year of the project. NYSDEC had the most
consistent response from year to year; and NJIT,, the most
variable. NJlT's year-to-year variability may be an artifact of
the small number of collocated/split samples taken during the
first year of the project. Specific findings for each
organization are presented below.
NJIT Canisters: Benzene relative response was similar for
the two years of the study—109% of the PEI reference during the
first year, and 116% of the reference during the second year.
2-9
-------
However, annual averages for toluene, m.- and e~xylene, and o-
xylene relative responses were 187%, 240%, and 144% of the PEI
reference during the first year of the study; and 91%, 75%, and
67% of the reference during the second year. In contrast, the
1,1,1-trichloroethane average increased from 78% of the PEI
reference in the first year of the study to 133% in the second
year.
NJIT Tenax: Annual averages for all compounds were within
95% to 116% of the PEI reference in the first year, and 72% to
113% of the reference in the second year. Relative responses for
m- and E-xylene, o-xylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and hexane
averages were approximately 25% lower in the second year of the
study relative to the first year. Conversely, the benzene
average was 16% higher in the second year of the study than in
the first. Toluene was essentially unchanged, with only a 4%
relative difference between years. Comparisons on a yearly basis
must be made with care, since the first year's results were drawn
from a much smaller data set than the second year's, and thus may
be skewed more easily. Therefore, the second year's results are
more likely to be representative of NJIT's performance.
NYSDEC Sorbent Tubes; For each year of the study, annual
averages for benzene, toluene, and m.- and g-xylene were within
20% of the PEI reference. Ortho-xylene, dichloromethane,
tetrachloroethene, and 1,1,1-trichloroethane averages were 61% to
76% of the PEI reference during the first year of the project,
and 57% to 79% of the PEI reference during the second year.
NYSDEC maintained an extremely consistent relationship to the PEI
reference over the two years, showing a difference of -16% for
toluene, +12% for benzene, and less than ±9% for'all other
compounds reported, with the exception of ethylbenzene. NYSDEC
ethylbenzene results for the first year of the study are based on
one quarter of data.
CSI Tenax; Annual averages for toluene, benzene, m- and p.-
xylene, and tetrachloroethene were within 30% of the PEI
reference for both years of the study. Ortho-xylene and 1,1,1-
trichloroethane averages were 53%-65% of the PEI reference
throughout the project. These two compounds typically showed a
response lower than the PEI reference when sorbent-based sampling
was employed, regardless of the laboratory performing the
sampling/analysis. The responses for m,- and p.-xylene, o-xylene,
and 1,1,1-trichloroethane varied by less than 10% between the
first and second year of the project. Hexane data for the first
year were caveated above, due to possible sampler contamination.
The second year's data were 101% of the PEI reference.
Ethylbenzene results appear to be biased high, with a response of
169% of PEI in the first year; however, this declined to 120% of
PEI in the second year.
2-10
-------
2.3.5 Results - Analysis of Variance and LSD
The analysis of variance (ANOVA) is presented for seven
compounds—toluene, benzene, m.- and E-xylene, o-xylene,
tetrachloroethene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and hexane. Sample
sizes were insufficient for each of the other compounds sampled;
the reasons for this data insufficiency are explained in the
Section 2.3.2 caveats and notes. Calculations were done for each
year of the project.
The sample set used for the ANOVA was developed from the
collocated samples. For each collocation event, the
concentration reported by the individual sampling organization
was subtracted from the PEI canister result reported. This was
done for all compounds examined, and for each organization. The
transformation of data in this manner allows for the direct
comparison of NJIT, CSI, and NYSDEC because the transformed data
reflect only the difference between each organization and the
reference PEI canister, independent of the ambient air
concentrations present during sampling. This treatment of PEI as
the standard, although not technically a standard, forms a
legitimate reference for comparison. The data transformation
approach and the statistical methods applied here were developed
in consultation with EPA/AREAL.
The results *of the statistical analysis presented offer
several important and different pieces of information. The ANOVA
partitions the variance of the data set into the variance
occurring between treatments and the variance occurring within
treatments. In our case, the term treatment refers to the
organization. Therefore, the ANOVA partitions the variance into
the components attributable to the differences between CSI,
NYSDEC, and NJIT, and the variance attributable to variability
within the individual organizations themselves.
The F statistic is used to determine if the differences
between organizations, computed in the ANOVA procedure, are
significant. Significance at the 5% level is indicated by a
single asterisk, and at the 1% level by a double asterisk. If
significance is indicated by the F test, further analysis may be
done using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) statistic. The
advantage of the LSD is that it allows a determination of which
organizations are similar to one another and which are different.
The F test, in contrast, only signifies that differences exist
between all of the organizations analyzed. The LSDs presented
here should be used only to compare the performance of the
organizations. These LSDs should not be used to compare
differences observed between individual sites operated by the
different organizations. The limitations of the data set and the
experimental design reguire the use of advanced statistical
models and computer programs, as well as extensive statistical
consultation, to understand the limitations, caveats, and
assumptions inherent in an analysis of inter-site comparisons.
2-11
-------
Comparisons of sites operated by different organizations are
addressed in Volume V of the project report.
This following section includes the ANOVA and LSD statistics
for all sampling events that included collocation (or splits)
with PEI canisters. Estimates, of bias between organizations are
relative to the PEI reference, not an absolute standard. ANOVA
tables for both years of the study are presented in Tables III-2-
4 to 17, and LSD tables are presented in Tables III-2-18 to 23.
Data sets used in the collocated canister intercomparison of
organizations are presented in Tables III-2-26 to 36.
2.3.5.1 First-year data
The results of the ANOVA and F tests are presented in Tables
III-2-4 to 10. Examination of these data shows that no
significant differences existed between organizations for the
analysis of benzene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene,
and hexane. Significant differences were found for toluene, m-
and E-xylene, and o-xylene.
LSDs are presented in Tables III-2-18 to 20 for results
shown to be significant by the F test. Analysis of the data
using the LSDs is presented in Table III-2-23. The toluene and
m- and £-xylene data showed the same trends. All organizations
had greater concentrations than the collocated PEI canisters,
with the exception of NYSDEC results with m.- and E'xylene. The
NJIT canisters, showing the most extreme case of this bias, were
significantly different from all other organizations and sampling
methods. The NYSDEC tubes, most closely resembling the
collocated PEI canisters, were significantly different from the
CSI tubes. The NJIT tubes were statistically indistinguishable
from either the CSI or NYSDEC sorbent tubes.
For o-xylene, CSI and NYSDEC tubes had lower concentrations
than the PEI canisters, whereas the NJIT canisters had greater
concentrations than PEI. NJIT tubes were almost equal to the PEI
canisters. The NYSDEC and CSI tubes were statistically
indistinguishable from one another, although both were
significantly different from the NJIT canisters. The NJIT tubes
were statistically equivalent to all samples and methods used.
2.3.5.2 Second-year data
The results of the ANOVA and F tests are presented in Tables
III-2-11 to 17. Examination of these data show no significant
differences for benzene, m- and p.-xylene, o-xylene,
tetrachloroethylene, and hexane. Significant differences were
found with toluene and 1,1,1- trichloroethane.
LSDs are presented for results shown to be significant by
the F test in Tables III-2-21 and III-2-22. Analysis of the data
2-12
-------
using the LSDs is presented in Table III-2-23. For toluene, the
NJIT canisters and CSI tubes had lower concentrations than the
PEI canisters, whereas the NYSDEC and NJIT tubes had greater
concentrations than the PEI canisters. The NJIT canisters and
Tenax were not significantly different from any other
organizations, or each other. The CSI and NYSDEC tubes, however,
were significantly different from each other.
For 1,1,1-trichloroethane, CSI, NYSDEC and NJIT sorbent
tubes had lower concentrations relative to the PEI canisters,
while the NJIT canisters had greater concentrations. The CSI
tubes had the lowest concentrations relative to PEI, and were
significantly different from all other organizations. The NJIT
and NYSDEC tubes were statistically equivalent to one another,
although they were different from both the CSI tubes and the NJIT
canisters.
2.3.6 Discussion
The above statistical analysis indicates that real biases
did exist in the sampling/analysis for certain compounds.
Furthermore, these biases were suggested by the descriptive
statistics found in Tables III-2-1 and 2. Other differences may
exist, however they are obscured by the variability in the
sampling/analysis methodology.
The sorbent methods showed a remarkable degree of agreement
across organizations relative to PEI. The range of differences
between all organizations was <63% relative to PEI, and typically
<30-40%. Use of the NJIT canister data must be done with care,
due to the small sample size, which may not be representative.
Further analyses of the differences between organizations
and sites might include the following:
1. Based on the ANOVA, in cases where significance was
observed, adjust all data for that organization by the mean
difference for each organization as stated in the ANOVA
table. Based on the QA information provided by the
organizations, construct 95% confidence bands around the
data reported for each organization/site.
2. Perform an ANOVA, segregated by site, for each collocated
pair. This would allow for the determination of the
variability inherent within an organization that occurs at
each site. (it is this interaction term of site and
organization that complicated the ANOVA, precluding its
being presented here.)
2-13
-------
2.4 INTER-ORGANIZATION COMPARISON VIA SHOOTOUTS
2.4.1 Scope
These comparisons, also referred to as shootouts, are based
on multi-day collocation experiments involving all of the
participating sampling organizations. The experiments were
conducted to ascertain the extent of variability among the
organizations, including the combined effects of sampling and
analysis. This was necessary because each organization had
independent control of its own sites; under normal operation, the
organizations did not collocate samplers. Therefore, these
experiments were the only opportunity to compare the
organizations with each other directly. Three such experiments
were conducted over the course of the SI/NJ UATAP. Further
information may be found in Volume VI.
2.4.2 Results and Discussion
The results of the experiments are presented in Tables III-
2-24 and 25. Table III-2-24 compares the mean results of each
organization to either EPA/AREAL or PEI, depending on the
experiment examined. The organization means are based on days
when there were samples for both the individual organization and
EPA/AREAL or PEI. Data that were reported as below the minimum
detection limit (MDL) were used in the computations by treating
one half the detection limit as the real concentration. All
computations using one half the MDL in Table III-2-24 are
asterisked. The PEI data presented for Experiment I are not
treated in this fashion because the detection limits of PEI at
that time were so high (>0.5 ppb) that using half the detection
limit would be misleading; in these cases, "MDL" was entered in
the table instead of a number. Table III-2-25, Experiment
Results, shows the results for each day of all three shootouts.
The Tenax data presented are the means of the two distributed-
volume tubes used for each sample.
Specific observations and findings for each of the
experiments are presented below.
Experiment I: The experiment, conducted 10/20/87 - 10/22/87
on the roof of Susan Wagner High School in Staten Island, was the
official start-up of the sampling phase of the SI/NJ UATAP.
Sorbent samples were taken by CSI, NYSDEC, and NJIT. Each
institution analyzed the samples it collected. Canister samples
were taken by CSI and the University of Medicine and Dentistry of
New Jersey (UMDNJ) and analyzed by PEI, a contractor to EPA.
Personnel from EPA/AREAL in Research Triangle Park also
participated and collected canister and Tenax samples. Samples
were obtained for all three days by each organization, with the
2-14
-------
exception of NYSDEC, which had technical problems on the first
day, and EPA/AREAL, which was scheduled to sample for only two
days.
The results can be examined in Tables III-2-24 and 25.
These tables show that the differences between organizations for
the various compounds ranged from near agreement to several
hundred percent. Certain trends were apparent, such as PEI's
inability to detect most compounds. Another trend observed was
that NJIT Tenax data were generally lower, and its canister data
higher, than those of other organizations. Another finding was
that dichloromethane was not being retained by the Tenax traps.
Additional QA was arranged by the Quality Assurance
Subcommittee based on these results. First, all participants
were required to analyze an additional Performance Evaluation
(PE) sample, which is an EPA/AREAL sample spiked with volatile
organic compounds of concentration unknown to the analyzing
organization. Second, PEI was audited by EPA/AREAL, and a
subsequent field sample was split between EPA/AREAL and PEI. The
results of the PE's can be found in the QA assessments of NJIT,
CSI, and NYSDEC found in Volume VI. PEI's results can be found
in a separate section of Volume VI.
Experiment II: The second experiment was conducted on
7/25/88 - 7/28/88 at Susan Wagner High School. By this time, the
shakedown period'of the project had ended, and a typical profile
of the VOCs in the project was evident. Additionally, the
limitations and strengths of the sampling and analytical
processes as they influenced the project and quality of the data
were known. The participants were the same as previously, along
with several institutions that did not provide routine monitoring
for the SI/NJ UATAP. Samples were obtained from NYSDEC, CSI,
NJIT, and PEI for all four days with the following exceptions:
(1) NYSDEC's ATD-50 tubes for day 1, (2) NJIT tubes and canisters
for day 2, and (3) EPA/AREAL canisters for day 4 and Tenax tubes
for days 3 and 4.
The results of this experiment are discussed at length in
the report, "Quality Assurance Subcommittee Report on the Results
of Shootout #2," which is included in Volume VI. A major finding
was that differences between organizations narrowed to within a
factor of two for almost all compounds over the course of the
study. However, greater levels of variation were sometimes
evident for a particular day of the experiment, especially with
compounds present at ambient concentrations <0.5 ppb. This
suggested that differences between organizations, and
consequently between sampling sites in the study as a whole,
would be more difficult to discern due to the large variation
produced by the different sampling and analytical methodologies.
An additional finding of this experiment was that PEI's detection
limits had improved dramatically.
2-15
-------
Experiment III: This experiment was conducted during
September 1989 at the Port Richmond post office site in Staten
Island. Twenty-four-hour samples were taken at six-day
intervals, commencing with 9/1/89. This experiment differed from
previous ones in that its purpose was to ascertain the
differences in analytical variation between organizations. The
sampling equipment for all sorbent tube samples was provided by
NYSDEC, with the exception of the sorbent cartridges themselves,
which were provided by the individual organizations. The
participants in the study were NJIT, CSI, NYSDEC, and PEL
The results can be seen in Tables III-2-24 and 25. NYSDEC's
and PEI's results had the closest level of agreement. The low o-
xylene readings relative to PEI are indicative of a trend
reported in Volume VI that is seen for all organizations.
However, the magnitude of the response in this instance is double
that typically seen with annual averages. CSI and NJIT reported
data that were substantially below those reported for NYSDEC and
PEI for all compounds. The reason for these differences is
unknown. However it should be reiterated that NJIT and CSI were
using NYSDEC's samplers, and not their own, in this experiment.
Thus, the low readings reported for these organizations may have
resulted from tube/sampler interface problems. During the time
period of this experiment, CSI had additional analytical
difficulties which were corroborated by the CSI/PEI
Tenax/canister collocations done at this time. A further
discussion of CSI's assessment of these difficulties is presented
in Volume VI.
2.5 MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AUDITS
2.5.1 Scope
Volume VI contains the audit reports generated by the
Management Systems Audits (MSAs) conducted by the Quality
Assurance Subcommittee. The purpose of the MSAs was to examine
the implementation of Quality Assurance and Quality Control
methods in the sampling and analytical processes of each of the
organizations submitting data for the study. Also related in the
audits were several differences in the sampling and analytical
procedures used by organizations, differences that may not have
been recorded elsewhere.
2.5.2 Summary of Results
The findings of the MSAs showed satisfactory QA/QC
implementation by all the organizations participating in the
study. The original MSA's are found in Volume VI.
2-16
-------
2.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROJECT FLANS
The approved Quality Assurance Plans submitted for the
analysis of VOCs for this project are found in Volume VI.
2.7 SAMPLING SITE REPORTS
The site reports contain descriptions of the sampling sites,
photographs, maps of the nearby geographical area, and scale
drawings of the sampling sites. The complete site reports can be
found in Volume VI.
2.8 QUALITY ASSURANCE SUMMARY
The Quality Assurance Reports submitted by each organization
contain their assessments of data quality, supported by
statistical evidence. These reports show that sample
contamination was negligible. Organizations with sorbent-based
systems reported either low background levels or consistent
background levels for which corrections were made easily. For
most compounds, accuracy was ascertained to be within + 50% of
performance evaluation samples provided by EPA/AREAL. Duplicate
samples or comparison of parallel distributed-volurae sorbent
tubes were within 10-30%, depending on the organization.
Breakthrough was not found to be a concern, except in the case of
dichloromethane; for dichloromethane, breakthrough was
widespread, with the exception of the NYSDEC trisorbent tubes.
CSI had some breakthrough with 1,1,1-trichloroethane, approaching
a 25% difference between distributed-volume pairs.
Comparisons among organizations were made for seven out of
the 11 compounds on the original target list. These compounds
were toluene, benzene, m- and £-xylene, o-xylene, 1,1,1-
trichloroethane, tetrachloroethylene, and hexane. Compounds not
analyzed for differences between organizations were
dichloromethane, chloroform, trichloroethylene and carbon
tetrachloride. Comparisons were based on each organization's
performance relative to PEI canisters, which were routinely
collocated with the organization's samplers throughout the study.
Deviation from the PEI reference was <50% for almost all
samples and compounds examined. Deviations beyond this range
were shown to have a statistically significant bias as seen by
the ANOVA. The range of difference for the sorbent methods used
by the organizations was typically 30-40% or less, depending on
the chemical, validating the factor-of-two estimate developed
from the Shootout data. NJIT's canister methods could not be
2-17
-------
evaluated as rigorously as the Tenax methods because sufficient
collocation data were lacking.
Dichloromethane was not analyzed by ANOVA because only the
NYSDEC and PEI data could be accepted unequivocally and without
large gaps. The direct comparison of these two organizations
showed that NYSDEC1s trisorbent results were within 70-80% of
PEI's canisters.
Chloroform, trichlorethylene, and carbon tetrachloride
results were not analyzed by ANOVA because the ambient
concentrations were below the detection limit of the collocated
Summa® canister. Thus, there was no basis upon which to compare
the different organizations. CSI, NJIT, and NYSDEC all reported
annual mean concentrations for these compounds in the range of
0.03 - 0.2 ppb, with typical levels being close to 0.1 ppb. The
variability for compounds found at such concentrations, close to
the detection limits of the analytical systems used, was greater
inherently than that for compounds present at higher
concentrations. Therefore, it is unlikely that any significant
differences between organizations can be discerned for these
three compounds.
ANOVA results for the first year of the study showed
significant differences between organizations for toluene, m- and
E-xylene, and o-xylene. The largest differences between
organizations were seen with toluene and m- and p.-xylene, where
the NJIT canisters were biased to a much larger extent than any
other method. Differences between other methods were of much
smaller magnitude. With o-xylene, all sorbent tube-based methods
showed equivalent negative bias relative to the PEI reference.
NJIT canisters showed positive bias relative to PEI, but the
magnitude of the bias was equivalent to that of the sorbent
tubes. No significant differences were found in the cases of
benzene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, tetrachlorethylene, or hexane.
ANOVA results for the second year of the study showed
significant differences between organizations for toluene and
1,1,1-trichloethane. With toluene, the largest difference from
the PEI reference was exhibited by the NYSDEC sorbent tubes. In
the case of 1,1,1-trichloroethane, the greatest difference from
the PEI reference was observed with the CSI sorbent tubes. No
significant differences were found in the case of benzene, m.- and
p.-xylene, o-xylene, tetrachloroethene, and hexane.
The findings elucidated by the ANOVA indicate that biases
between organizations occurred only for a minority of the
compounds analyzed. Other differences may also exist; however
they are obscured by the variability of the sampling/analysis
methodology and the limitations of the data set.
The results of the collocation experiments that
intercompared organization performance directly (i.e., the
2-18
-------
shootouts) showed that the organizations generally differed
within a factor of two. Variation between organizations
exhibited no consistent pattern across all three experiments.
Individual studies, however, did reveal instances of inadequate
detection limits, bias, and confirmation of trends observed in
the data.
Management Systems Audits showed adequate quality control
measures and appropriate laboratory practices. Site inspections
and reports indicated proper sampler siting and uniformity of
approach within each organization.
2.9 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This section was prepared by Mr. Avraham Teitz and
Mr. Marcus Kantz of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region II.
2.10 REFERENCES
Steel, R. G. D.; Torrie, J. H. (1980) Principles and procedures
of statistics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
2-19
-------
QA Tables III-2-1 through 25
2-20
-------
Table III-2-1
Caparison Between Organizations and PCI Canisters
Tear Huaber 1 of Study
toluene teraene
Organization
NJ1T IMMX
X of PEI
Avg. Cone.
Std. Oev.
Std. Error
n
MJIT Canister
X of PEI
fc*». Cone.
Std. Oev.
Std. Error
n
•TSDEC Tube*
Xof PEI
Avf. Cone.
Std. Oev.
Std. Error
n
CSI Tube*
116
4.78
1.63
0.64
4
187
T.73
4.24
1.03
4
104
2.46
0.9T
0.14
48
97
1.51
0.90
0.47
4
109
1.07
0.7S
0.43
4
110
0.98
0.60
0.11
47
K/P
Xylene
104
1.58
1.49
0.41
4
240
3.67
2.49
0.79
4
92
1.15
0.55
0.11
42
0-Xylene
94
0.62
0.57
O.U
3
144
0.96
0.66
0.41
4
61
0.38
0.32
0.09
40
Dichtoro
•ethane
Tetra
chloro
ethylene
withdrawn
withdrawn
withdrawn
withdrawn
withdrawn
insuffi-
cient
data due
to PEI
HDL
withdrawn insuffi-
withdrawn cient
withdrawn data due
withdrawn to PEI
withdrawn HDL
71
0.58
0.41
0.11
33
66
0.25
0.16
0.15
17
1.1.1
Trichloro
ethane
101
0.71
0.68
O.AJ
2
78
0.55
76
0.48
0.32
0.16
12
Kexane
Ethyl
Benzene
Trichloro
ethylene
95 not done
1.71 not done
not done
not done
1 not done
111 not done
2.00 not done
not done
not done
1 not done
not done
not done
not donfc
not done
not done
67
0.40
0.60
0.20
12
Chlorofora Carbon
Tetra
chloride
insufficient data due to H>L
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due ta HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
Insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
Insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
Xof PEI
Avg. Cone.
Std. Oev.
Std. Error
n
Xof PEI
Avg. Cone.
Std. Dev.
Std. Err.
n
128 89 130 60 artifact 129 58
3.90 1.13 1.87 0.39 artifact 0.67 0.34
1.51 0.71 1.20 0.21 artifact 0.15 0.30
0.21 0.14 0.20 0.10 artifact 0.11 0.11
34 34 31 23 artifact 13 U
4
0.90
36.11
1.34
20
169
0.9S
0.64
0,20
16
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
• (Annual average concentration/collocated PEI average concent r»tioo)*100
• Mean Annual Organization Concentration
* Standard Deviation of the Difference Between the Collocated PEI and Organization Concentrations
« Standard Error; Square Root(Std. Dev./n)
« Saaple sixe
2-21
-------
Table III-2-2
OrsaniiaUan
NJ1T Tenax
Xof Kl
Avg. Cone.
Std. Pev.
Std. Error
n
Toluene
112
3.07
1.74
0.21
32
•enient
111
1.19
0.65
O.H
33
Comparison letueen Organizations and PEI Canisters
tear Nujber 2 of Study
N/F
Xylene
0.77
0.72
0.1*
32
0-Xyli
78
0.35
0.27
0.10
30
OicMoro
•ethane
withdrawn
uithdraun
withdrawn
withdrawn
withdrawn
tetra
chloro
ethylene
«3
0.23
0.11
0.10
11
1.1.1
Trichloro
ethane
72
0.51
0.38
o.n
32
Hexane Ethyl Trichloro Chloroform Carbon
lenzene ethylene Tetra
chloride
100 not (tone insuf tic lent data due to HDL
O.BS not done insufficient data due to HDL
0.48 not done insufficient date due to HDL
O.U not done insufficient data due ta HOI
25 not done insufficient date due to ML
HJIT Canister
X of PEI
Avg. Cone.
Std. Oev.
Std. Error
n
VI
3.51
0.71
0.34
6
116
2.08
0.27
0.21
4
75
1.05
0.44
0.27
ft
67
0.3B
0.14
0.15
6
uithdraun
uithdraun
withdrawn
uithdraun
withdrawn
61
0.12
0.04
0.12
4
t.O*
0.23
0.20
6
101 not done
1.46 not done
0.60 not done
0.35 not done
5 not done
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient date due to MDL
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
insufficient data due to HDL
NVSOEC Tube*
X of PEI
Avg. Cone.
Std. Dev.
std. Error
n
120 96 95 57 79 57 70 not done 122 insufficient data due to HDL
3.76 1.14 1.47 0.48 0.76 0.52 0.48 not done 0.60 insufficient data due to HDL
1.31 0.36 1.00 0.98 0.68 1.08 0.34 not done 0.40 insufficient data due to HDL
0.10 0.05 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.15 0.06 not done 0.10 insufficient data due to HDL
130 127 123 109 1t4 51 108 not done 94 insufficient data due to MDL
CSI Tube*
Xof
Avg.
Sid.
Std.
n
X of
Avg.
Std.
Std.
n
PEI
Cone.
Oev.
Error
PEI
Cone.
Dev.
Err.
94 107 121 65
3.14 1.19 1.69 0.38
2.01 0.4S 0.63 0.15
0.25 0.12 0.14 0.08
31 30 30 25
artifact
artifact
artifact
artifact
artifact
95
0.86
0.30
0.15
13
53
0.48
0.50
0.14
25
101
0.84
0.32
0.11
25
120
0.51
0.23
0.10
25
insufficient
insufficient
insufficient
insufficient
insufficient
data
data
data
data
data
due
due
due
due
due
to NOL
lo HDL
to HDL
to HDL
to HDL
* (Annual average concentration/collocated PEI average concentrat ion)*100
« Hean Annual Organization Concentration
* Standard Deviation of the Difference Between the Collocated PEI and Organization Concentrations
B Standard Error; Square Root (Std. Oev./nl
= Staple site
2-22
-------
Table III-2-3 *' f«elslon Analysis
Average Standard
Concentration Deviation
Toluene 3.01 0.34
Benzene O.M 0.06
H/P Kylene 0.93 0.25
Olchloroacthane 0.89 0.22
Hexane 0.79 0.26
0-Kylene 0.50 0.25
1.1.1 Trichloroethane 0.37 0.10
Ethyl lenzen* 0.24 0.11
Tctrachloroethylene 0.16 0.03
•ased on 2 studies.
Study 1 Involved three collocated canister* over • period
of four seperat* days during Shootout *2.
Study 2 Mas based on the puqp/puapless col I orM ions
conducted with three collocated canisters on
two scperate days.
The data fro* the studies Mere pooled after analysis of variance
and hoMogeneity of variance tests Indicated the acceptability of
such an approach.
further statistics available upon request.
2-2?
-------
Table III-2-4 to 5
Analysis of V»ri«xe Ictvcn Organizations
4th Outrter 1967 • 3rd Quarter 1984
Table 4. Toluene 1«t Year of Study
CS1 NJIT HJIT MTJCEC
TUBES CANS TUBES TUBES
Srrples (n) 31 * * 48
Sum (Xi) -27.50 -14.40 -2.60 -4.77 T.. -49.27
Suit (Xi'2) 98.15 91.98 7.74 A3.56 241.41
(Sum JXi}>*2/n 24.40 51.84 1.69 0.47 C • 27.90
individual SS 73.73 40.14 6.05 43.08
individual Hetn -0.89 -3.60 -0.65 -0.10
Total SS • 213.50 df • 86
Trmmnt SS • 50.50 df • 3
Error SS « 163.01 df • 83
Source of df Sum of Mtan F
variation Squirt* Squart
Ictwtcn trtatmtnts 3 50.50 16.83 8.57
yithin treatments 83 163.01 1.96
Table 5. Bwutne Ut »«ar of Study
CSl NJIT «JIT KYSOEC
TUBES CANS TUBES TUBES
Samples (n) 31 * * ^**
5.10 -0.60 0.20 -4.15 Y.. 0.55
Sun (Xi'2) 15.98 1.34 1.96 16.65 35.93
(Sun (Xl))*2/n 0.84 0.09 0.01 0.37 C • 0.00
Individual SS 15.14 1.25 1.95 16.29
Individual Man 0.16 -0.15 0.05 -0.09
T«ai"s$""i 35.93 df • 85
Treatment SS • 1.30 df • 3
Error SS • 34^63 df • 82
Source of & Sun of Mean f
Variation Squares Squart
Between treatments 3 1.30 0.43 1.03
Within treatments 82 34.63 0.42
2-24
-------
Table III-2-6 to 7
Analysis of Vantree letwi
4th Qutrtir 19BT • 3rd Qutrttr 1966
Table 6.
Stales Ci3
SJT. (Xi)
Su* (Xt*2>
(Sin (XiJ>"Z/n
Individual SS
. M/P Xylane 1st Tear
CS1
TUBES
31
•15.70
47. U
6.05
41.11
Individual Mem -0.4t
Total SS •
Treatment SS
Error SS •
«
NJIT HJ:T HTSOEC
CANS TUBES TUBES
4 4 42
•8.64 -0.23 4.17
32.04 4.92 12.41
16.49 0.01 0.41
13.5! 4.91 11.99
•2.15 -0.05 0.10
92.34 df •
20.82 df •
71.56 dl •
ef study
I.. -18.33
96.53
C • 4.15
80
3
77
Source of
variation
Bet wen treatment!
uithin treatments
df b*» of
Squares
1 20. 62
77 71.56
Man F
Squart
t.94 7.47 ••
0.93
Table 7.
cst
TUBES
Samples (n> 23
Sun (XI) 5.30
Sun W2) 2.15
(Sun (Xi))*2/n 1.22
Individual SS 0.93
individual Mean 0.23
Total SS •
Treatment SS •
Error SS •
Source of
Variation
Between trittavnts
uithin treetnems
0-Xylant IK Tear of Study
KJIT HJIT NIS3EC
CANS TUBfS IUBES
3 3 40
•0.90 0.10 10.20 T.. H.70
0.83 0.51 6.52 10.01
0.27 0.00 2.60 C • 3.13
0.5& 0.51 3.92
•0.3D 0.03 0.26
6.U df • 68
0.96 df • 3
5.91 df • 65
df *u» of Mttn f
•quart* Square
3 0.96 0.32 3.53 •
65 9.91 0.09
2-25
-------
Table III-2-8 to 9
Analysis of Variance Setnen Organiiations
4th Quarter 1987 • 3rd Ouarter 1988
Tabli
8. 1ft T«ar
1,1,1 TricMoroertarw
CS1 KJ1T UIT KTSSEC
TUBES CANS TUtES TUIES
Samples (n) 18 1 2 12
Sun (Xi) 4.00 0.80 -0.10 1.86
Sun (Xi'2) 2.28 0.64 0.25 1.32
($um.(Xi)r2/n 0.89 0.64 0.00 0.29
Individual SS 1.39 0.00 0.2S 1.03
Individual Mian 0.22 0.80 -0.05 0.16
Total
ss • 3.18 df •
Treatment SS • 0.52 df •
Error
SS * 2.66 df •
of Study
Y.. 6.56
4.49
C • 1.30
32
3
29
Sourei of df Sun of
Variation Squarts
Setneen trtatnwnts 3 0.52
Within
treatments 29 2.66
Mian F
Square
0.17 1.88
0.09
Table 9.
Samples (n)
Sun (X<)
Sum (XC2>
(Sum CXi»"2/n
Individual SS
1st Tear
Tetraehloroethyltni
CSI NJIT HJIT HTSOEC
TUBES CANS TUBES TUBES
13 0 0 17
•2.10 2.20
0.63 2.22
0.34 0.28
0.29 1.94
Individual Mean -0.16 0.13
Total SS •
Treatment SS
Error SS •
2.85 df •
• 0.62 df •
{.23 df •
of Study
Y.. 0.10
2.85
C • 0.0003
29
3
26
Source of
variation
df Sun of
Squares
letveen treatments 3 0.62
within treatments 26 2.23
Mean r
Square
0.21 2.43
0.09
2-26
-------
Table III-2-10
Analysis of Variance let**n Organist ions
4th «uart«r 19B7 • 3rd Ouarur 1988
Table 10. 1st Yt»r of Study
Nexant
CS! HJIT NJIT HTSDEC
TUBES CANS TUIES TUIES
Samples (n) 20 1 1
Sun (Xi) 393.70 -0.20 0.10 T.. 393.60
Sun 31290.7 0.04 0.01 31290.76
(Sun (Xi»-2/n 7749.98 0.04 0.01 C • 7041.86
Individual SS 23S40.7 0.00 0.00
Individual Man 19.69 -0.20 0.10
Total SS • 24248.90 df • 21
Triatmtnt SS • 708.17 df • 3
trrer SS • 23540.73 df • 18
Sogret of Sun of Mian *
Variation (quarts Squart
trtitmtnts 708.17 236.06 0.18
Within treatments 23S40.73 1307.82
2-27
-------
Table III-2-11 to 12
Analysis of Variance Ittwtn Organisations
4th Quarter 1980 • 3rd Quarter 1989
Table 11.
CSI
TUIES
Sanplet (n) 31
Sun (Xi) 6.50
Sim (Xi'2> 117.71
(Sun «i))'2/n 1.36
Individual SS 116.35
Individual Mian 0.21
Total SS •
Treatment SS
Error SS «
Souret of
Variation
ltt«een treatments
Within treatments
2nd Te»r of Study
Tolutnt
NJIT NJIT NTSOEC
CANS TUBES TUIES
6 32 130
2.10 -11.00 -81.34 T.. '83.74
2.83 148.19 269.61 538.33
0.73 3.78 50.89 C • 35.23
2.09 144.41 218.71
0.35 -0.34 -0.63
S03.10 df • 198
21.54 df • 3
481.56 df • 195
df Sun of Mtan F
Squarts Square
3 21.54 7.18 2.91 •
195 481.56 2.47
Tablt 12.
Satpltt (n)
Sum (Xi)
Sun CXl-2)
{Sum (Xi)}*2/n
Individual SS
Individual Mtan
Total SS •
Treatment SS
Error SS •
2nd Ttar
lenient
CSI
TUIES
30
-2.90
5.75
0.28
5.47
-0.10
•
NJIT NJIT NYSOEC
CANS TUIES TUIES
6 33 127
-1.80 -4.60 3.10
0.80 18.98 16.51
0.54 0.64 0.08
0.26 18.34 16.43
-0.30 -0.14 0.02
41.84 df •
1.34 df •
40,50 df •
of Study
T.. -6.20
42.04
C • 0.20
195
3
192
Souret Of
Variation
IttMtn treatments
Within treatments
df Sun of
Squarts
3 1.34
192 40.50
Mean f
Square
0.45 2.12
0.21
2-28
-------
Table III-2-13 to 14
AnalyeU of Variance BotMen Organizations
4th Qutrttr 1980 • 3rd Quarter 1989
Table 13. 2nd Year of Study
M/» Xylene
CS1 NJIT NJIT NYSOEC
TUBES CANS TUBES TUBES
Samples (n) 30 6 32 123
Sam (Xi) -9.00 2.10 8.81 9.90 V.. 11.81
Sum (Xi*2> 14.00 1.63 17.71 121.93 155.27
(Sum (Xl»-2/n 2.70 0.74 2.42 0.60 C • 0.73
Individual SS 11.30 0.90 15.29 121.13
Individual Man -0.30 0.35 0.28 0.08
Total SS • 154.54 df • 190
Treatment SS • S.92 df • 3
Error SS • 148.62 df • 187
....... ^........ .........................................
Source of df Sum of Keen 1
variation Squares Square
Between treatments 3 5.92 1.97 2.49
Within treatments 187 148.62 0.79
Table 14. 2nd Year of Study
0-Xylene
CSI NJIT NJIT NYSDEC
TUBES CANS TUBES TUBES
Samples (n) 25 6 30 109
Sum (Xi) 5.30 1.10 3.00 38.50 r.. 47.90
Sum (Xi*2) 1.69 0.31 2.40 115.77 120.17
(Sum (Xi»*2/n 1.12 0.20 0.30 13.60 C • 13.50
Individual SS 0.57 0.11 2.10 102.17
Individual Nean 0.21 0.18 0.10 0.35
Total SS • 106.67 df • 169
Treatment SS • 1.73 df • 3
Error SS • 104.95 df • 166
Source of df Sum of Nean r
Variation Squares Square
Between treatments 3 1.73 0.58 0.91
Within treatments 166 104.95 0.63
2-29
-------
Table III-2-15 to 16
Anfclysfs of Variance IttMtn Organizations
4th Quarter 1988 • 3rd Cuarter 1989
Tibl* 15. 2nd Tur of Study
1,1,1 TrieMoroethene
CSI NJ1T NJtT HTSOCC
TUIES CAMS TUItl TUtES
Samples (n) 25 6 32 108
SuT(Xi) 10.20 -1.70 6.30 21.82 T.. 36.62
Sun CXi*2> 10.44 0.71 (.03 16.77 31.95
(Si* (»i))'2/n 4.16 0.48 1.2* 4.41 C • 7.84
Individual SS 6.2S 0.23 2.79 12.36
Individual Mt*n 0.41 -0.28 0.20 0.20
Total SS • 24.10 rtf • 170
Treatment SS • 2.45 df • 3
Error SS • 21.65 df • 167
Source ef df Sun of Mean f
Variation (quarts Square
Sttuean treatments 3 2.45 0.62 6.30
Within treatments 167 21.65 0.13
Table 16. 2nd Tear ef Study
Tetrachloroethyltn*
CSt NJIT NJIT NTSOEC
TUIES CANS TUES TUIES
Samples (n) 13 4 11 51
Sun (Xf> 0.50 0.20 O.SO 20.05 T.. 21.25
Su» (XC2) 1.01 0.02 0.17 64.56 65.76
(Sum (XO)*2/n 0.02 0.01 0.02 7.U C • 5.72
individual SS 0.99 0.01 0.15 56.68
Individual Mean 0.04 0.05 0.05 0.39
Total SS • 60.04 df • 78
Treatment SS • 2.22 df • 3
Error SS • ST.-83 df • 75
Source of df Sum ef Mean F
Variation Squares Square
•et»een treatments 3 2.22 0.74 0.96
Within treatments 75 57.83 0.77
2-30
-------
Table III-2-17
Antlysit of Virianei litMtn Oretniittien*
4rh Qutrtcr 1988 • 3rd Ouarttr 1989
TaSIt 17.
SimpIts (n)
2nd Tttr ef Study
CSI NJIT NJIT NTSOEC
TUIES CANS TUiES TUIES
25 S 25
Sun
Sun
(Sun
(Xi)
CXi'23
CXiJ>
Individual
Individual
•2/n
SS
-0
-N2
0
2
M«an-0
.300
.250
.004
.246
.012
0
1
0
1
0
.000
.160
.000
.160
.000
0.
9.
0.
9.
0.
000
240
000
240
000
T.. -0.
12.
C • 0.
30
65
00
Total SS • 12.650 df
Tr tit merit SS • 0.002 df
Error SS • 12.646 df
54
3
51
2-31
-------
Table III-2-18 to 20
Itttt Significant Cifftrtnctt bttv*tr> Orgtniittiont
(All unitl art ppb)
First Yttr of Study
Stcond Yttr of Study
Ttblt 18.
Ut Yttr ISO Ce«ptrUent:Tolutot
NJIT NJIT MTSDEC CSI
Ttntx Ctnitttrt Tubtt Tubtt
NJIT Tm*x 1.97 1.45 1.41
HJIT C«ni«ter» 1.97 1.45 1.48
NYSDEC Tubtt 1.4S 1.45 0.64
CSI Tub«« 1.48 1.48 0.64
T.blt 19.
1»t Ytir ISC CanpiritencM/P Xyltnt
NJIT NJIT NYS9EC CSI
T«n*x C*nf*ttrt Tubci Tubtt
NJIT Ttrjx 1.W 1.00 1.02
NJIT Ctnitttrt 1.36 1.00 1.02
NYSDEC Tubts 1.00 1.00 0.4S
CSI Tubti 1.02 1.02 0.45
Ttblt 20.
1st Tttr LSD Cenptr
-------
Table III-2-21 to 22
Tabltt 18 to 22.
LMft $i«nif iwnt Otffwtncet *«-•*» Or|«nilit»en»
(All Ifftits «rt P»*)
fir«t Yt«r of Study
Stcond Ttar of Study
Ttblt 21.
2nd ««tr ISO Con
NJ1T Tinax
NJIT Caniittr*
NTSDEC TubM
CS1 Tub»«
parUencTeium*
NJH II JIT
Tinti Canisttri
O.f-*" 1.29
0.78 1.37
HTSoce
Tlfttl
0.61
1.29
••*•••
0.62
esi
Tubtt
0.78
1.37
0.62
Ublt 22.
2nd Ttir LSD Can
NJIT Tentx
NJIT CanUtcr*
NTSOCC Tutof
CS1 Tubtt
parj«enc:1
NJIT
Ten*, c
0.31
O.U
0.19
,1.1 TricMorotth
NJIT NTS9IC
•nitltrt Tub**
0.31 O.U
0.32 0.16
int
CSI
Tubes
0.19
0.32
0.16
2-33
-------
Table III-2-23
Table of LSO tanking* by Organization for Canpoundl Whtrt «f U Significant
lit Ttir
TOLUENE
Organization Average
From HI
HYSOEC Tubes
NJH Tubes
CS! Tubes
NJIT Canisters
Dttl
Difference
(in ppb)
•0.10 •
•0.65 »,b
•0.89 b
•3.60 c
M/P XTLENE
NTSSEC Tubes
NJIT Tubes
CSt Tubes
NJIT Canisters
O-.XTLENE
NTSOEC Tubes
CSI Tubes
NJIT Tubes
NJIT Canister*
0.10 a
•0.05 a,b
•O.U b
•2.15 e
0.26 a
0.23 a
0.03 a,b
•0.30 b
2nd Tear Ota
TOIUCNE
Organization Average Difference
from Pit (in ppb)
NJIT Canisters 0.35 a,b
CSI Tubes 0.21 a
NJIT Tubes -0.34 a.b
NYSDIC Tubes -0.63 b
1,1.1 TRICHIMOETHANE
CSI Tubes 0.41 a
NJIT Tubes 0.20 b
NTSOEC Tubes 0.20 b
NJIT Canisters -0.28 c
The tetters f61 towing the "Average Difference from »EI"
•re used to indicate statistically significant differences.
Organizations that have the same tttttrs are considered statistically
indistinguishable from one another.
2-34
-------
Table IH-2-24
Shootout Nt«ra l*Utlv* t* EPA/MEM. Hid ft I
Unit* o
•Jit
tUHl
IOLUEK
•hooteut 1 0.1
•hootout 2 1.0
•QUEUE
•hootout 1 0.1
•hootout 2 O.t
H/P ITLEOE
•hootout 1 0.1
•hootout 2 0.7
0-mEMc
•hootout 1 0.1
•hoolout 2 0.1
• ucmoKMEiMH!
•hootout 1 0.0
•hoolout 2 0.1
• HfUCMMf tOUf
•hootout 1 *.4
•hoolout 2 1.1
••Milt* Of
Shootout* 1 ond
2
lOrtMiliatlml M*n/IEPA/AIEAL conltlorl Mon
MSOEC CSI EPA/IIP MIT PEI
EM IUK IllOtS IMES CMIISIEI CMISIEI
O.t
0.7
1.4
0.7
1.2
0.*
0.2
0.9
':*
1.4
1.1
1.0
0.7
M
1.4
::
0.1
0.4
1.0
1.1
1.0
•.9
0.9
1.1
*:•
t.i
1.2
0.2
0.2
M
1.1
2.2 1.9
2.1 0.9
1.2 ML.
1.4 O.l'
1.1 MM
1.4 0.9
2.S MM
1.4 1.2
0.2 MM
1.4 1.5
0.1 MM
2.1 0.4
• 1.1.1-nitmOMEMMI
•hootout 1 0.4
•hootoul 2 fl.4
1.1
0.4
0.&
1.5
4.1 MM
1.4 O.J
• CAMW ffTIMXUillf
•hootout 1 1.7
••MIMIC 2 0.7
W
0.4
1.1
1.5
1.1
2.2 MM
4.4 O.i
EPA/MEM.
CMIISIEI
CCHCEMIIAIIOM
2.4
1.1
1.1
1.4
0.7
0.4
•0.5
4.4
0.4
oil
••0.5
0.7
0.1
0.2
••tut l* el
Shootout* 2 tnt
1
unit* • I0ro«nlt*tlonl Mon/IPEI conlttorl •
•411 KISMC CSI EPA/IIP •Jit
IUUS AID IUU IUKS IUKI CMISIEI
1MUTHE
•hootout 2 1.2 0.9
•hoolout I 0.4 1.2
MIZEH
•hootout 2 I.I 1.4
•hootout 1 0.1 l.l
N/P MtEME
•hoatout 2 O.I 0.7
ohoolout I 0.1 0.9
0-IIUHE
•hootout 2 0.5 0.7
•hootout 1 0.2 0.1
•lOUOMMillWM
•hoolout 2 O.I 0.5
•hootout 1 0.0 0.4
• KriACMOMXimC
•hoolout 2 1.7 1.2
•hoolout 1 O.I 0.0
• 1.1.1-HICKOMEIIUIK
•hoolout 2 I.I 0.1
•hootoul 1 0.2 0.4
1.2
0.7
0.0
0.1
1.7
0.5
0.4
0.1
0.1
0.1
2.1
0.0
1.2
0.1
1.1
1.4
1.1
MP
1.1
0.2
MP
2.2
MP
5.7
MP
1.4
1.4
MP
1.1
MP
0.9
1.2
2.7
1.4
MP
ion
EPA/IIP
CAMIIIEI
1.1
MP
I.I
MP
1.1
MP
1.9
1.7
MP
1.7
MP
1.4
MP
PEI
CMIISIEI
CUKE*- •
IIATItt
*"**'
1.4
l.l
0.9
1.2
1.2
2.2
0.4
2.2
1.0
0.7
0.2
0.4
O.I
0.9
• IndlcMM thot MM concontritlom u*r* boloH tho m.
ft* • mull. 1/2 th* MH MM u»«J In tht coapulMlon*.
PUM* comult IMI for • dlMwion o» th* COVCMI of uttr* ••• dot*.
•• Indlccto* ttot ctnUtor d*t* M* unovolloUo, tnt EPA/IIP lonw MO* •utetltulod.
MM. • Oolou th* alnloui doloetoM* IUII.
W • ••!• for Ihl* coBpouml MM not roportod.
MP • »ld not portlcifiot* in itudy
2-35
-------
Table III-2-25
Compound
Orginfxttion
Collocation EKptriiwm Ittultt
Shootout I (1PB7) Shootout II (19U) Shootout 111 (1989)
10/20 10/21 10/22 | 7/25 7/26 7/27 7/2* (9/1 9/7 9/13 9/19 9/25
Itnttnc
CSI
MTSOEC EnvJroehtm
NTSOEC ATO-50
NJIT Ttn»
HJIT Cinfsttr*
PE1 Ciniften
EPA Ctniittr
EPA Ttni*
Telutnt
CSI
VIKit
«YS:E: ATS-so
NJIT Ttn«K
MJIT C»ni«ttrt
PE1 Cinicttrs
EPA C.nftltr
EPA Ttnti
M/P Xyttn*
CSI
NTSDEC Envlroehtm
NTSDEC ATD-50
VJIT TWMX
HJIT C«ni«t»r»
fll Cani>t«rs
IPA Ccnfittr
fPA TCTMI
< / 11 1 ft
-------
Table III-2-25 cont'd
Collocation Exptriamt tcsulu
Conpourt Shootout I (1987) Shootout II (19U) Shootout til (1989)
OrginUition 10/20 10/21 10/22 | 7/23 7/24 7/27 7/28 |9/1 9/7 9/15 9/19 9/25
0-Xyltr*
cst
KTSOEC InviroehM
VTSOEC ATO-50
KJIT Ttrui
NJ1T CiniUtr*
HI C»nisttr$
EPA Can! stir
EPA Ttrwi
DIcMeremtthtnt
CS1
NTS9EC Envirochtm
MTS3EC ATO-50
HJ1T Ttrwx
KJIT C*nist«rt
•El Ctnittirs
EPA Cinftttr
EPA Ttnt*
1,1,1 Triehlerotthant
CS1
NTSOEC Enviroehtm
NTSOEC ATO-50
KJIT T«nu
•JIT C«nitttrt
PI I Ctniturt
CP« C«nS,*5 0.4 <0.6 0.4
0.2 — • 0.6 1.6
0.* 1.0 1.3 1.4
0.2 . 0.5 0.2 0.4
0.2 •— 0.3 0.6
<0.2 0.6 O.S 0.5
0.4 1.7
0.3 0.9 0.4 0.7 0.8
0.1 0.1 0,J 0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2
0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2
0.7 — • 0.7 1.2 0.9
2-37
-------
Table III-2-25 cont'd
Shootout ttsultt
Compound
Orgtnizttfon
Shootout I (1987)
10/20 10/21 10/22
Shootout II (1988) Shootout 111 (1989)
| 7/25 7/26 7/27 7/28 |9/1 9/7 9/13 9/19 9/25
Tctr.ehlorotthtm
CSI
NTS8EC Enviroehom
HTSOEC ATO-50
NJIT Ttnix
NJIT Ctnitttrt
HI Coniittrg
EM Cinitttr
EM T*nt«
Ethyl Itnitn*
CSt
NTS3EC Envlreehtm
KTS3EC ATO-50
NJIT ttntK
NJIT C«ni$ttr«
Ml Cinitt.ri
EM Can! ttor
01 01 n 1
01 fi 1 c n
-------
Table III-2-25 cont'd
Collocation Exptriatnt Itsultt
Corapound Shootout I (1987) Shootout II (1988) Shootout III
Organization 10/20 10/21 10/22 | 7/25 7/2* 7/27 7/28 |9/1 9/7 9/13
(1989)
9/19 9/25
Carbon Tttr»chtorio>
CSI
•TSOEC Enviroch
MTSOEC ATO-50
MJIT Tcnu
NJIT Ciniitirs
HI C«nfittr§
EPA Canicttr
EPA Terux
Chloroform
CSI
NYSOEC Envirochi
NTSOEC ATO-50
MJIT Ttnax
NJIT C«nf*t«r»
PEI C«niittrs
EPA Cantittr
fPA T*n«
Ntxinc
CSI
NTSOEC Envirochm
NTSOEC ATD-50
NJIT Tonax
NJIT C*ni«t«r«
HI CmUttrs
EPA Caniittr
EPA Tmut
0.12 0.10 0.15
0.13 0.21 0.23
0.39 0.06 0 06
<0.5 <0.5 <0.5
0.02 0.05 0.03
O.W 0.02
0.38 0.00 0.17
0.39 0.03 0.03
<0.5
-------
QA Tables III-2-26 through 36
DATA SETS USED IN COMPUTATIONS
2-40
-------
Table III-2-26
MM Jersey Institute of Technology
HI Canister* vs. NJIT Canisters and Tenax
•Cartaret and Elitabtth Senples
4th Quarter 17 • 3rd Quarter U
(All units art pcc>>
Compound:
•El
Canister
3.1
3.0
S.I
S.S
Compound:
•El
Canister
2.5
0.9
1.0
1.8
Compound:
HI
Canister
0.6
1.8
2.3
1.4
Compound:
HI
Canister
0.6
0.9
0.5
Toluene
NJIT
Canister
11.9
3.3
7.3
8.4
•enzene
NJIT
Canister
2.S
0.2
1.7
2.4
N/P Xylene
NJIT
Canister
3.8
6.4
3.1
1.4
0-Xylent
NJIT
Canister
1.5
1.0
0.4
NJIT
Tenax
3.2
4.2
4.1
7.6
NJIT
Tenax
1.3
1.3
1.0
2.4
NJIT
Tenax
0.9
1.3
1.0
3.1
NJIT
Tenax
0.5
0.4
1.0
Difference
Canister Tenax
•8.8 -0.1
-0.3 -1.2
•2.2 1.0
-3.1 -2.3
Difference
Canister Tenax
0.0 1.2
0.7 -0.4
•0.7 0.0
-0.6 -0.6
Difference
Canister Tenax
-3.2 -0.3
•4.6 0.5
-0.8 1.3
0.0 -1.7
Difference
Canister Tenax
•0.9 0.1
•0.1 O.S
0.1 -0.5
•El
Canister
Nexane
NJIT
Canister
NJIT
Tenax
1.8
2.0
1.7
Difference
Canister Tenax
•0.2 0.1
1,1,1-Trichloreethane
•El
Canittir
0.8
0.6
•El
Canister
nd
nd
nd
nd
NJIT
Canister
0.5
NJIT
Tenax
0.5
1.0
Tetraehloroethene
NJIT NJIT
Canister Tenax
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
Difference
Canister Tenax
0.3 0.3
-0.4
Difference
Canister Tenax
2-41
-------
Table III-2-27
Compound:
•El
Canftttr
3.4
3J
6.8
1.9
2.3
5.6
Compound:
HI
Canitttr
2.0
1.7
3.1
0.9
1.0
Tolutnt
NJIT
Canitttr
3.4
3.8
5.7
1.5
1.9
4.7
8tnttnt
NJIT
Canitttr
2.5
2.2
3.3
0.9
1.1
NJIT
Ttnax
4.8
11.6
9.5
1.0
2.9
3.2
NJIT
Ttnax
2.3
4.4
5.4
0.6
0.9
Ntv Jtrtty Inttitutt of Technology
H\ Canftttrt vi. NJIT Canitttrt and Ttnax
Cartirtt and Elliabtth Sanpltt
4th Ouarttr U • 3rd Qutrttr 89
(All wiitt art ppb)
Oifftrtnet
CanUttr Tanax
0.0
-0.7
1.1
0.4
0.4
0.9
-1.4
-8.5
-2.7
0.9
-0.6
2.4
Oifftrtnet
CanUttr Ttnax
-0.5
-0.5
•0.2
0.0
-0.1
-0.3
-2.7
-2.3
0.3
0.1
CowMtd:
Hi
CanUttf
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
Conpotnd:
«t
Canitttr
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
Ntxan*
HJIT
CanUttr
1.5
1.8
1.5
1.1
1.3
NJIT
Tanax
1.2
3.4
2.8
O.S
1.2
0
-------
Table HI-2-28
Inttftlut* af T*ehn*lety
Caniatari vs. »JIT Tana«
Colloeitlon Data from Stitarwn and PfacataMy
1st Ouartar 09 • 3rd Ouartar If
I.I.VIHrtlaretthane
HI
Can. Tanai Oiffaranea
1 a
3
4
*
2
2
7
5
4
9
8
4
6
6
8
1 5
0 5
o a
1 7
03
03
1 1
04
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
2
1
4
2
5
4
3
2
4
7
3
3
8
2
2
5
7
4
0
0
0
•0
0
0
0
•0
0
0
0
0
0
•0
0
0
0
0
0
0
•0
0
Banxi
ret
Can
2.'
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
^
o'.]
0.1
1.1
KM
Taw
I
o!
0.
0.
r o.
r o
0
* Biff*
•0.7
•0.
0.
•0.
•0.
•0.
0.
•0.
•0.
0.
0.
0.
•1.
•0.
0.
0.
0.
•0.
•0.
•0.
0.
•0.
0.
0.
TatracMarMthana
Kt
Cm. Tana* Olffaranca
Ortha-Iylana
wi
Can. Tanax OHfaranea
0.*
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.3
3.8
0.3
0.3
O.S
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.9
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
3.7
0.1
0
Mm and »ara lyiana
Kt
Can. Tana* Dlffaranea
Ntitna
•E!
Can. Tana« 0
-------
Table III-2-29
C*l(«t« •» lutan Uland
Kl CanUttr* «•. 1«r»» 0»t«
4l» tartar 07 • 3rd tartar U
Mil tfilta art as»>
UVTrlcMaraathana
Caniitar Tana* Offftranca
Caniitar
Carter) TatracMaria*
Tanu Xffirtnc*
Canlittr
; ttWkansana
Tem» Oi«aranca
Caniittr Tanii Oifftrtnet
J
1
t
t
e
0
0
0
e
g
3 O.S 1
t O.S 0
4 0.1 0
3 0.3 0
1 0.2 0
3 0.2 0
*ft 9 ft
D.Z D
4 0.1 0
4 0.2 0
7 0.2 0
t 0.2 0
t 1.1 -0
S 0.4
4 0.2
t O.I
t O.S
t 0.3
S O.S
0 0.2 0.0 0.2 0
1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0
3 0.4 0.3 0.1 0
0
4 Ca^atrri: TatracMaraatnana
i Canittar Tanai Oiffaranea
3 0
2 0
S 0
4 e
2 0
1 0
2 0
2 0
1 0
3 6
0 1
0
0
3 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
2 0
3 0
4 0
1 1
t 1
4 0
0 1
4 0
7 0
2
3
4 >
S
4
7
7
1
2
t
1
S
4
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
.4 0
.3 0
.3 1
.3 1
2
7
S
3
2
4
S
S
7
t
S
S
t
0
3
.3 O.t 0.4 O.S
.3 O.t 1.7 -1.1
.3 0.4 0.2 0.2
.S O.I O.t 0.2
.4 4.1 O.S 4.3
.7 O.t 0.4 0.2
.4 1.2 1.4 -0.2
.2 O.S oil -o!s
.S 0.7 O.S 0.2
.2 o.t e.s 0.4
.4 O.I 0.7 0.1
.2 1.
.4 41.
.7 132.
.2 74.
1.1 S».
.3 27.
.1 17.
.1 10.
.1 t.
1.4 -0.4
1.4 at.l
1.2 13:. 1
S.S 71.3
0.4 St.t
0.4 2t.l
O.S 17.4
O.I t.4
O.S I.S
C»ajUv>«! Itnitnt Camp***: •/» «?!•«• Ca*m*«; 0-»ylf» Cenpei**: Taluf*
C*niit«r 1*nu Blfftrtnca Ccniittr T*nw Bifftrtnct Canitttr T«nw Ctfftrtnc* C«ii«tir T*nt» Dltftrtne*
1.7
C.»
1.3
0.4
1.4
1.0
O.t
0.7
O.t
l.t 1
2.3 0
I.S 0
1.1 0
O.I 0
e.i o
1.4 0
0.7
O.S
1.4
1.2
l.t
2.0
1.4
l.t
S.4
2.4
1.2
1.1
«.*
1.1
O.t
O.t
1.4
0.7
t 0.1 0.7 O.t 0.1 0 S
0
7
t
1
3
4
4 0
t 0
2 0
4
7
1
S
4
t
3
7
3
t
t
1
S
7
1
7
1 *0
2 -0
7 -0
1 0
4 >0
t «0
• *0
t .0
1 O.S 1.0 -0
t 1.3 O.I 0
0 1.3 O.S 0
S O.S 0.7 >0
7 0.7 0.
2 1.0 1.
3 1.0 1.
0 2.S 2.
4 1. 2.
t 0. 1.
I 1. 2.
3 1. 1.
S 0. 1.
4 1. 2.
0 1. 2.
4 0. 2.
2 1. 3.
1 2. 3.
4 2. I.
0 1.4 t.
2 1.0 3.
1 2.7 4.
2 1.2 1.
7 1.4 2.
1 I.I 0.
t 1.1 0.
0
•0
•0
•0
•0
•0
•1
•0
•0
.1
•0
S 0
S 0
I
2
1
4
4
4
7
4
2
4
4
4
t
•1.4
•1.T
-1.3
•1.0
•1.0
•1.1
2
2
]
g
7
2
S
i
4
s
s
7
T
t
t
7
1
t
4
1
1
1
* O.S
0 0.1
4 1
1
1
4
2
1
1
1
1
S
3
1
4
2
2
S
2
1
S
4
S
s
•1 4 0.4 0.3 O.S S
44 S
-9 t »
4 1 r
01 X
t O.t 1.4 -07 S
i o.r 1.1 -04 i
S 1-4 1.0 >02 1
S O.t 1.0 -0 1 1
3 1
2 S
2 1
t 1.7 -0.1
f 7.S -S.t
S 1.1 -0.3
4 l.t 4.1
» 2.T O.Z
0 0.* 0.1
4 1.2 0.2
7 2.1 -0.4
t 2.T -0.1
7 4.0 *0.3
» 4.4 -6.7
1.4 0.2
S.S -1.2
2.» -0.4
3.1 -O.t
S.4 -l.t
3.1 -1.1
2.t *1.4
4 4.2 -0.1
3 .3 -2.0
2 .1 -O.t
0 .7 .0.7
3 .0 *1.7
7 .0 *1.S
.0 «2.2
7.1 *0.l
1.0 >2.2
I.I *2.3
I.S -O.S
3 2.4 >0.1
7 4.S >2.l
1 1.t >0.4
4 «.1 -O.S
t 2.S >0.4
2-44
-------
T«bl« III-2-30
*f tut* lil*«
HI cvrintra <«. Tmi »m
4U Otttttr M - JH 0»n»r It
(All «rit* *r« «•*>
i Ctrton Tttrtrhtvrt*
»w^^^»»"
tvtUttr
1.2
O.'t
O.t
0.7
e.o
0.4
O.'t
2.0
1.1
1.0
O.t
OJ
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.1
1.1
0.4
ft«l
2.7
O.S
O.I
f«^ILT
O.t 1 1
3.1 2
0.7 0
S.I S
1.7 S
i.e i
»
^*
1.
i.
i.
j.
s.
%
•*
i)
7.
j|
j|
.*
i!
i.
*
i!
2
4
4
2
7
J
.
. .
2
1
2
.
1
A
llU 3
t.t 1
l.T 1
M
1
7
J
s
e
4
4
4
0
p
]
4
3
$
2
g
4
4
1
S
-0.1
•0.7
•0.2
•0.1
•0.1
0.1
• .1
• .1
.e
.1
.0
.0
.t
•e.i
0.0
•0.2
0.2
•O.t
0.0
0.4
0.1
0.3
•0.1
e.]
0.4
0"f«rtr««
-0 2
0 S
•0 1
-0
e
-0
g
•0
•0 t
•0 t
0 4
•0 7
•1 2
•1 0
0 S
0 1
»4
0 t
•C 4
•1 1
•t 4
•0 S
1
* ^
7
}
1
*
•
1 1
01
-------
T«bl« IH-2-31
k«v l*rt llttt
Ml C*il»t»r» vi.
4«i autrttr ItW -
inlt* Inn*)
dtl«nun*
Caniit*r 1i*» ftlff
CwiUttr
C*niitir
Tubt Clfftrincr
— i"j
i.t
1.1
0.4
lit
1.7
1.1
.7
.1
.7
.7
.i
.J
.]
.T
,1
.a
.1
.7
,7
,1
,4
',0
4,2 t
2.* !
3.3 4
2.7 J
1.1
l.t
2.4 3
1,7 1
3.3 :
2.S J
O.I 1
0.3 1
I.I 1
I.I 1
1.4 J
1.3 1
2.1 J
1.4 I
0.7 1
e.t i
1.1 t
.3
"^
'.j
,i
)o
.1
,4
.1
.4
.1
.1
.1
.4
.7
j
.4
,4
.4
,4
.1
.1
5
'.t
.2
1.
".
.
.
.7
.S
.1
.0
.0
.1
.4
.4
.4
.4
.4
.f
.4
.t
.f
O.t
1.S
.2
. .1
• ,1
• .4
,7
.4
• .4
. .1
- .i
• .0
il
- .0
> .4
.0
.4
it
.4
.3
• il
- .4
io
.0
.0
• .1
.2
• .4
.1
•0.1
0.2
0.0
o.s
•0.2
•1.S
-0.2
•0.2
-no
•o.t
•0.2
•1.S
•(.7
0.0
•M
Q.I
1.1
0.2
0.3
O.S
O.I
O.I
O.I
0.4
no
1.2
0.4
1.1
O.S
0.7
«.^l
lie
C.I
e.i
1.5
O.T
1.3
O.t
1.0
1.2
O.t
1.1
1.S
1.2
1.0
O.S
0.7
1.1
0.4
1.3
0.7
O.I
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.1
0.1
0.1
O.S
1.0
l.fl
0.2
2.4
1.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
1.0
1.7
1.1
0.3
1.3
1.1
0.4
.1
.7
.5
.1
.7
.0
A
.3
.S
.4
.1
.4
li
1.
0.
0.
0.
O.t
1.4
0.4
1.1
O.S
o.s
1.S
e.t
0.7
3.0
0.*
0.3
O.S
•0.1 e
0.1 1
0.0
•2.3
•0.4
•0.2
0.1
0.3
-0.4
•0.7
-O.t
0.3
•0.2
-1.3
0.1
•0.1
1.2
•O.S
0.)
0.1
O.J
0.1
0.0
0.4
0.4
•0.4
0.3
O.t
0.4
•0.2
0.0
-0.4
0.1
0.3,
•0.1
-0.1
0.3 e
-«.4 «
0.0 *
•0.1 e
•1.0 1
-9.4 1
0,1
•O.t
•0.1
0.1
0.0
S 1
1
1
s
s
7
0
0
1
T
f
4
7
3
2
7
1
0
S
4
0
t
0
2
3
a
t
t
S
i
7
t
g
t
7
0
1
4
0
0
>.3
,^
.0
.4 .
.1
.1
.4
.0
.^
.7
.t
.4
.J
.3
.0
.1
.1
.1
.2
.7
.»
.4
.0
.3
.S
.1
.2
.1
.0
.3
.t
.t
.1
,t
.7
.1
,7
.S
.7
.7
,0
.S
0.1
0.3
•0.2
0.1
•0.3
•0.4
0.4
0.0
0.2
1.0
1.0
-1.0
0.2
.0
• .1
. .1
.3
.t
.3
.7
.S
O.S
.0
• .1
- .2
• .1
• .3
.$
• .$
1.3
-0.2
0.0
•0.2
0.0
0.0
O.I
•0.3
•0.3
0.0
•0.1
0.0
-o.s
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
O.I
1.1
e.i
0.!
O.I
0.4
D.I
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
O.T
1.1
1.2
0.4
O.J
O.i
0.4
0.5
O.T
0.4
1.1
O.t
O.i
0.4
e.i
O.i
O.i
O.I
0.3
0.3
0,4
1.1
0.1
0.1
0.3
C.3
0.1
0.3
0.3
9.2
0.4
8.7
C.2
0.4
O.t
0.1
e.i
0.4
O.i
0.1
C.2
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.3
O.T
0.3
0.4
0.4
e.s
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.3
1.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
O.J
C.I
0.1
0.*
1.0
-B.I
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
e.s
1.1
.7
.1
.1
.7
.4
O.I
0.1
.1
.1
- .2
.4
.0
.7
- .1
0.1
.0
'.a
.3
.0
.0
.1 •
.1
.1
.4
-------
Table III-2-32
MM Tern Stttt Bwn't«mi •< fnvlr«nM*>li! ttnumtian
Ml C*nl*t«rt «•. InvlrwtMB tortant tubti
*th awcrtvr WIT • Ird feartar 1*tl
(All Wild tn B*>
^«*:1,l,1-tMeMer«tih«n« c«pei«d:PicM»rMttlWfit CMpMftf:T*tr*ehl»rottMnt
nitlir 1i*t Oi««r*nct OMlttr Ti£t (Ifftrme* CanUttr Ttftt Offfftne*
.7 0.
.0 0.
.3 1.
.3 0.
.5 0.
.2 C.
.3 0.
.1 0.
.t 0.
.» 0.
.4 0.
.1 0.
J
T
• 2
• 2
0
T
. 1
1
1
.1
.1
.1
.7
.1
.t
.»
.t
.t
.0
,7
.1
.2
.1
,4
.5
.<
.J
.4-
.*
.4
.4
.*
(|
.1
,7
.1
.t
.2
.3
.0
.1
.t
.1
,s
.1
.2
f .
.3
,4
.t •
.0 •
.2
.J -
.t
.T
.*
.1
,J
.3
.t
.f
je- •
.3
.1
.4
.4
.J
.4
.1
.4
.3
.3
.3
.2 «
.} 07 0.1 0.4
,1 1
e
Q
e
Q
0
s e.z i.i
2 02 O.D
3 0
3 0
2 0
2 0
2 0
3 0
0
Q
Q
2 0.1
3 O.D
3 -0.1
4 -O.J
2 0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0.0
0
1
5 O.S
2 0.0
2 0
^
J 0.0
CwpotMhf tfcyl Ivmint
Ctniittr' lubt Oif4*rtnct
.e -e.2
0 02 1
g
g
fl
0
g
2 0
4 0
J -0
1 0
2 0
2 0
t 0
3 e
1 0
} -0
I 0
i
3
1
I
3
1
2
1
2
0
2-47
-------
Tabl* HI-2-33
*•« Ttf* !»•«« Dwnwit .f tmrir«
Kl Cw>U»n v». «8S8 IUM»
4t» Iwrttr IMI • lr* tuirttr 1flt
(All will* *r* jvb)
ntil Cmtrvitlwi
2S!
2.4
i!i
2.1
4.1
l.t
4.2
3.1
1.1
3.1
2.1
1.7
I.I
i.g
1.7
1.1
.1
.4
.4
.4
.T
.7
.f
.4
1.1
1.2
4.4
1.1
1.1
.1
.0
.1
.1
.1
4.1
1.2
t.t
1.1
1.4
1.1
1.1
1.1
4.1
1.4
4.1
1.1
1.1
4.1
1.2
.7
.2
.2
.1
.1
.7
.f
10. •
1.0
1.1
2.0
4.2
0.0
4.1
1.7
1.1
7.2
"'££
2.4
1.0
1.
4.
3.
S.
7.
1,
S.I
1.4
1.
4.
4.
2.
e.
0.
i.
2.
i!
i.
5.
1.
4.1
1.7
4.1
1.1
1.4
1.1
1.0
7.0
J.B
4,t
10.1
4.2
4.0
l.f
1.1
2.4
1.S
l.S
f. t
(.0
7.7
1.3
7.1
l.t
1.)
2.0
1.4
1.4
1.4
2.2
••0
O.t
10.1
0.4
1.1
l.t
7.3
O.f
7.3
4.0
1.7
f.t
Oifftrm*
•0.2
-O.I
1.1
•0.1
-0.7
-1.0
•l.f
•0.0
•1.0
•1.0
•0.2
•1.4
•l.f
•O.S
O.S
0.1
•0.4
0.1
•0.4
•0.9
•O.I
•i.r
• 1.1
•1.4
•0.]
•1.1
•l.t
•o.s
0.0
0.0
•2.t
•1.7
O.T
•4.0
•1.0
•1.1
•0.4
•0.7
1.2
•0.4
•0.7
•2.S
•l.t
•O.I
•1.2
O.I
•O.I
•0.1
-0.1
-0.1
•0.1
0.0
•0.
0.
1.
e.
0.
e.
•0.
•i.
•0.
•1.
•0.3
e.i
•2.7
tavwd:
Cwiiinr
l.f
O.I
S.f
l.S
.S
.7
.4
.0
.7
.1
.1
.f
.7
.1
.t
.4
.0
3.1
1.4
I.I
f .9
2.1
4.1
1.4
2.1
1.1
1.4
1.1
1.1
.1
.2
.0
.S
.1
1.7
1.4
2.t
l.S
2.1
I.I
l.f
1.7
1.1
l.t
2.4
2.1
2.4
2.1
1.2
1.1
l.t
l.f
O.I
10.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
4.1
4.2
1.0
4.1
O.t
l.t
1.1
1.0
T.lurw
l.t
0.4
1.7
2.0
2.
7.
7.
S.
4.
2.1
1.1
0.7
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.1
t.f
1.1
1.1
4.7
11.0
l.t
l.f
1.1
3.
1.
1.
2.
S.
.7
.4
af
\
.1
.1
.1
.0
.7
.1
,9
l.f
l.t
1.4
2.7
3.2
2.1
2.4
2.T
f.I
1.0
4.0
2.4
7.*
10.0
2.1
1J
1.4
4 f
It
4 0
S 2
1 0
21
J £
t.*
OHferm* Canii
2.0
0.2
1.2
-0.1
-0.1
•O.f
•1.0
0.2
-2.3
0.1
-1.2
•0.2
•0.4
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
•O.f
• 1.1
0.4
3.1
•1.2
•1.1
•0.4
•1.2
•O.I
•1.5
•O.I
•2.1
•O.t
•o.t
•1.0
•2.1
-O.I
•0.1
•1.2
O.I 3
•0.4 i
0.0 1
1.1 1
•O.I 1
0.1 (
•0.4 t
0.0 C
0.0 I
•0.2 1
•1.4 1
•3.0 1
•0.1 1
0.1 1
1.0 1
-».« 1
•0.1 1
•0.1 (
•0.2 1
•0.4 1
0.1 1
•1.2 1
•1.1 !
-0.1 I
•0.4 1
•0.7 I
•0.1
t*d: l«n>*n*
l«r fife*
1.0 1.0
t.t 1.1
».l O.t
t.t 1.4
1.2 O.t
1.1 l.S
1.2 O.f
D.S O.I
1. 1.1
1. 1.1
1. 0.4
1. 1.1
9. 1.1
9. O.f
D. t.t
t. 0.4
9. O.I
1. O.I
I. 2.1
9. R.4
O.J
.1 t.t
.1 B.S
.t 1.1
.1 (.7
.4 1.0
.1 1.4
.1 1.1
.0 0.0
.1 0.7
.1 0.1
.4 0.0
.1 0.4
.r 0.7
.f 1.4
.f 1.0
.1 3.0
.0 1.7
U 1.2
t. 1.S
2.2
1.3
2.2
1. fl.t
i. 1.1
). .S
1. .7
1.7 .r
1.1 .4
.4 .4
.f t.t
.1 1.1
.t O.t
[.» 2.0
.1 0.1
.f 0.1
.1 0.4
.1 e.t
.1 1.1
.7 0.7
.7 2.7
.0 l.S
.0 1.2
.7 O.I
Hfferwwt
0.0
-0.2
•0.1
o.s
0.3
0.3
0.3
•0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
•e.s
•0.3
•0.1
0.1
•0.1
•0.1
0.1
• .2
• .1
.0
.2
.1
• .2
'.t
' .1
.7
0.2
0.1
0.0
O.I
0.2
0.0
•o.s
•e.i
•O.I
•0.7
0.2
•0.4
•0.4
0.1
•0.3
O.S
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
•0.1
1.4
0.1
•0.1
i.r
0.0
0.0
0.0
•o.s
•0.1
0.1
Cmiiltr
0.7
O.I
0.1
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
1.
t.t
O.I
1.1
O.I
1.0
O.I
0.4
0.7
1.1
C.T
0.7
1.2
1.1
1.4
0.7
O.S
0.0
1.1
0.7
1.4
O.I
O.I
1.1
1.2
0.7
1.1
O.I
1.0
2.7
0.4
l.S
1.1
2.7
1.4
0.7
O.S
0.1
0.7
1.4
1.4
1.1
1.1
0.4
O.S
0.1
0.4
1.2
1.7
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
•ni*n> (
.1
.4
,2
.1
.
0.
1.
0.
1.
B.
1.
2.2
0.4
0.1
O.T
1.1
O.T
O.T
O.I
2.2
.2
.0
.4
.1
.1
.1
!i
.2
.4
.2
.1
.4
,9
l.t
0.4
1.1
0.7
0.7
2.1
O.f
l.S
1.0
1.1
1.2
0.7
0^4
O.I
1.1
O.I
1.1
1.1
0.1
0.4
O.f
o.s
1.S
2.0
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.2
:««tiiw«
0.1
0.0
0.1
C.I
0.1
e.o
8.1
.2
.>
. .1
• .1
• .1
.1
.1
• .1
- .2
.1
• .1
• .1
• .t
• .S
• .1
• .2
.0
.1
• .1
• .2
.2
is
.2
'.t
e.i
,1
.1
.0
.1
.1
• .1
• .3
.0
.1
.S
.2
0.0
0.1
O.I
•0.1
0.1
0.4
•0.1
e.i
0.2
O.I
•0.1
0.1
•0.3
-0.3
•0.2
•0.2
e.o
-0.4
2-48
-------
Table III-2-34
NtM York State Department ef Environmental Conservation
ft: C«nt*teri vs. AT050 Tubes
4th barter 19U • 3rd Quarter 19S9
(Alt uMu are ppb)
Cam (t*r
1.2
1.1
0.8
1,9
1.3
1Q
.T
1.5
0.7
1m
.5
1.0
0.9
1.7
1.3
0.7
1.1
0.7
1.2
3.0
0.1
1.1
1.8
1.1
1.1
1.6
2.0
0.4
0.9
6.5
2.1
0.5
1.8
1.9
1.3
1.3
0.6
0.5
1.6
0.9
0.4
1.0
2.6
2.6
1.3
3.4
3.5
2.3
2.4
2.6
0.9
3.3
O.S
0.7
O.S
0.4
1.7
2.7
1.5
0.9
3.0
6.6
D.4
2.9
1.1
TUM
1.2
1.7
0.9
1.7
1.3
Zj
.4
2.1
0.9
2m
.2
1.2
0.9
2.0
1.4
o.a
0.6
1.1
1.1
2.9
0.7
1.2
2.4
1.4
1.S
1.5
2.7
0.7
00
. T
0.6
2.9
1.7
1.5
4.4
1.8
1.2
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.5
1.2
3.6
1.4
1.4
3.0
3.6
2.8
2.3
3.0
0.6
3.5
0.6
0.8
1.6
0.2
2.0
2.0
1.6
0.9
4.3
0.9
0.2
1.2
i!s
ten*
Olfferrrc
0.0
•0.6
•0.1
0.2
0.0
•o'.t
•0.2
•o!z
0.0
-0.3
-0.1
-0.1
0.5
•0.4
0.1
0.1
•0.6
•0.1
•0.6
•O.J
•0.4
0.1
•0.7
•0.3
0.0
-c.'e
-1.2
0.3
•2.5
•0.5
0.1
•0.1
•0.2
O.t
0.1
-0.1
•0.2
•1.0
1.2
•0.1
0.4
•0.1
•O.S
0.1
•0.4
0.3
•0.2
•0.1
•0.1
•1.1
0.2
•0.3
0.7
•0.1
0.0
•1.3
5.7
0.2
« »
1 • f
•0.2
Cenpoind
e Canister
0.8
3.3
3.4
2.
0.
•
D.
0.
•
0.
1.
0.
1.7
0.6
1 9
i •*
2.4
0.7
2.3
0.6
1.9
0.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
2.
2.
2.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.9
1.1
2.6
2.9
0.8
4.0
0.8
1.9
3.1
0.4
1.3
1.0
9.0
4.0
0.6
O.S
0.4
1.7
2.3
1.4
2.5
O.S
0.7
2.T
0.8
M/» Xytene (Centfrwed)Conpoind: 0-xylene Conpoxd
1U»e Difference Canister Ti*e OHfcrence Canister
0.9
3.8
4.1
2.5
0.9
1 fl
1 »W
0.3
0.4
OK
• 3
0.8
1.6
1.0
1.8
0.6
. c
1.7
3.0
0.5
0.9
0.7
1.5
0.7
0.8
0.6
2.1
0.9
1.0
1.3
1.1
1.6
0.8
0.7
1.3
1.3
0.6
1.4
1.0
0.3
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.2
0.8
1.1
4.1
1.1
1.6
1.1
2.9
3.7
0.7
O.S
O.S
1.9
1.5
2.0
2.8
O.S
0.9
1.3
1.0
-0.1
•0.5
-0.7
0.3
0.0
• ft C
U« •
0.0
•0.1
0*
, 1
•0.3
•0.2
•0.1
-0.1
0.0
• fi 1
¥« J
-0.6
fl.Z
1.4
•0.1
0.4
•0.2
•o.z
•0.1
0.2
•0.1
•0.3
0.8
1.8
-0^3
•0.1
0.2
0.3
0.0
•0.1
•0.1
0.8
1.6
1.8
-0.2
2.8
0.0
0.8
•1.0
•0.7
•0.1
-0.1
6.1
0.3
•0.1
0.0
•0.1
•0.2
0.8
-0.6
-0.3
0.0
-0.2
1.4
-0.2
0.3 0.3 0.0 0.7
0.6 0.7 -0.1 0.3
0.2 0.3 -0.1 0.6
0.6 0.7 -0.1 0.9
0.4 0.4 0.0 0.3
0.6 0.6 0.0 0.2
0.7 0,2 0.5 0.2
0.3 0.4 -0.1 1.6
0.4 0.3 0.1 0.3
1.1 0.9 0.2 1.7
01 ft i ft n 9 %
• * D.4 D.D 2.3
0.7 0.8 -0.1 2.3
0.5 0.4 0.1 0.2
0.5 0.5 0.0 0.2
0.6 0.5 4.1 0.9
0.8 0.8 0.0 1.2
0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2
0.2 0.2 0.0 2.5
0.8 0.9 -0.1 0.4
0.7 0.5 0.2 4.8
0.7 1.3 -0.6 0.4
O.S 0.5 0.0 2.2
0.6 0.4 0.2 O.S
0.5 0.2 0.3 0.5
0.5 0.2 0.3 2.1
0.4 0.4 0.0 0.2
1.2 1.2 0.0 0.6
1.2 0.9 0.3 0.4
1.5 1.3 0.2 8.6
0.8 O.I 0.0 2.1
0.9 0.7 0.2 0.3
1.1 1.0 0.1 0.2
0.4
1.4
0.2
0.3
o.r
0.2
o.r
1.0
0.6
0.4
1.2
O.S
0.2
1.2
O.S
0.3
1.4
1.4
1.S
0.3
0.3
O.S
0.3
0.2
0.$
.2 0.2 0.2
.1 0.3 0.8
.2 0.0 1.9
.2 0.1 0.6
.5 0.2 1.2
.7 • .5 0.2
.6 .1 0.3
.8 .2 3.0
.5 .1 0.3
.3 .1
.3 • .1
.3 .2
.1 .1
.4 .8
.4 .1
.3 .0
.2 .2
.3 .1
.8 .7
.3 .0
.3 .0
.3 .0
.2 .1
.2 .0
.5 0.0
Q-xylene
Tuse 0
0.5
0.2
0.6
1.0
0.2
OT
• *
0.2
0.4
09
.2
0.3
0.2
0.6
0.3
0.4
0.
.4
0.5
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.0
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.8
1.1
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.6
C.5
0.7
0.8
0.2
0.3
O.S
0.3
(Centinued)
f ference
0.2
0.1
0.0
•0.1
0.1
Ojt
.6
0.0
1.0
Of.
.0
•0.1
0.0
1.0
0.0
1.3
1A
.9
1.9
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.7
-0.1
2.1
0.1 .
4.4
0.1
1.9
0.1
O.I
0.5
1.7
•0.1
0.2
0.1
7.8
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.2
1.4
•0.1
0.4
0.0
0.0
2.5
0.0
2-49
-------
Table III-2-35
N*v fork ttit» Ocptrtnvnt of InvHrenncmil Centtrvition
PCI Ctnitttrt »*. ITS50 tife*i
4th Ouirter 1988 • 3rd Oujrt»r 1989
run irfti trt ppD)
1,1,1-Trfehloro«th»nt 1,1,1-TrfctiiorMthirit (Cntd) Conpc>tnd Dlehlcr
C»mH«r Tub* Difftrtnc* tinitltr TJst 0 0.2 0.2
) 0.8 0.2
I 1.9 0.0
r 0.4 0.3
) 0.6 1.4
0.2 0.1
0.6 0.9
fi.1 0.1
0.2 0.1
0.1 0.3
1.1 0.2
0.3 C.I
0.3 0.3
0.4 0.1
e.2 0.7
0.3 0.2
0.3 0.1
0.2 0.2
O.i 0.4
O.S 0.3
0.3 0.3
0.7 0.0
0.6 -0.1
O.i 0.3
> 0.4 0.5
> 0.3 0.1
' 0.5 0.2
> 0.3 0.3
. 0.1 0.3
'. 0.2 0.3
I 0.8 0.9
! 0,2 0.1
1 0,4 0.3
' 0.5 C.2
1.0 1.1
\ 2.1 0.2
' 0.3 0.2
> 0.3 0.2
> 0.4 t.O
1 B.l 0.2
0.2 0,3
0.2 0.3
' O.I 0.4
- 0.1 0.$
0.1 0.2
. 0.4 O.I
> 0.2 0.4
2-50
-------
Table III-2-36
Cflipetrd: T«tr»ehlerwth«nc
Ctnitttr TLtot Difftr«nct
N*H York Itttt Otptrtatnt of Environmental Cent*rvition
P£l Camstirt v». ATC50 TkMt
4th Butrttr 198* • 3rd Smrttr 1W9
(Alt win an ppb)
CenvoundtCthvl Imxtn*
Unitttr Tiftt Ditftrtnet
Conpm*d:Ethyl lenztni (continued)
Canitttr Tub* Olfftrtnec
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
o.a
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.3
0.3
o.t
S.1
0.2
0.5
0.7
0.3
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.6
1.B
0.8
0.4
4.7
0.6
1.1
1.4
0.2
5.4
0.3
0.4
0.2
0.7
0.9
0.4
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.2
3.7
0.5
0.9
1.2
0.6
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.3
1.3
0.1
0.1
0.4
0.2
0.9
0.4
0.6
0.6
1.1
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.5
0.7
1.3
0.1
3.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.5.
0.6
0.2
0.6
0.2
0.1
0.1
4.4
0.2
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.1
-0.1
0.1
0.0
0.2
•0.1
0.1
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.1
3.8
0.1
0.4
0.3
0.1
-0.1
o.s
0.3
0.2
0.7
0.1
0.1
6.4
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1
2.4
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.3
0.2
O.t
0.1
0.2
0.1
-0.7
0.3
-0.1
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.1
O.t
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.7
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2 1
0.5 1
0.6
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.7
0.4
1.0
1.0
0.6
0.8
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.4 I
0.5 <
0.6 <
1.0 1
0.4 I
0.3 1
1.1
t.1
0.4
1.0
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.7
0.2
O.i
0.9
0.3
1.0
O.A
9.
D.
D.
D.
t.
ft.
D.
).
I.
1.
5,
1.
9.
D.
9.
9.
1.
9.
9.
1.
9.
9.
9.
9.
9.
9.
1.
9.
9.
9.
9.
).
•
.(
.1
.1
.:
,t
i
!'
^
.1
.!
.»
.1
.
.9
.1
.1
.1
.1
-0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
•0.3
•0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.1
0.6
•0.6
0.4
0.0
0.2
•0.1
•0.3
•0.1
0.5
0.0
-0.2
0.1
-0.1
•0.3
0.0
•0.1
0.0
•0.2
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.3
•0.2
) -0.6
1 0.2
! 0.1
1 0.0
» *0.2
! 0.0
I 0.0
t o.o
i 0.0
e o.o
i 0.0
> -0.2
0.1
t 0.4
•0.2
0.2
-0.1
r -0.3
C.2
0.2
0.7
0.2
0.2
0.7
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.4
1.0
1.4
0.3
Ov7
1.0
0.5
0.4
2.9
1.3
0.2
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.2
0.2
0.6
0.2
0.3
0.4
O.i
0.5
0.2
0.7
0.4
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.4
0.6
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
•0.1
0.3
0.6
0.4
0.3
•0.2
•0.2
0.2
0.2
•0.2
0.7
1.1
0.1
0.4
•0.1
0.2
0.3
2.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.4
0.1
0.0
0.6
0.0
2-51
-------
3. DATA MANAGEMENT
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The Data Management Subcommittee was formed to provide a
point of contact for the collection, storage, and distribution of
data. This was especially critical since six different project
participants and contractors were to report ambient air data.
The subcommittee was responsible for developing reporting
formats, a data entry system, and a data reporting schedule. In
addition, the subcommittee reviewed the data for entry errors and
other anomalies, and conducted the initial data analyses which
provided the basis for initial site-to-site and overall inter-
laboratory comparisons. In addition, the data from this study
were compared to those from other studies found to have collected
sufficiently similar data.
3.2 DATA FORMATS
During the project, data were collected on several types of
compounds (i.e., VOCs, formaldehyde, and metals) by different
sampling methods (i.e., canisters, sorbents, and high volume
samplers); up to six different project participants and
contractors analyzed the samples contributing to the set of data
for a given chemical. Given the complexity of managing the
volume and variety of data generated, standard reporting formats
were necessary.
The data were entered into Lotus spreadsheets to facilitate
their manipulation on personal computers. The format for the
VOCs collected on sorbents is shown in Table III-3-1. Data on
one compound collected at one site during one month are shown on
each page. Data from each of two tubes collected on each
sampling day are shown, and the average for the two tubes is
shown. Summary statistics such as number of samples, maximum and
minimum concentrations, and average concentration are calculated
and shown for the individual tubes and the average of the two
tubes. The New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC) modified this form to accommodate
idiosyncracies of its data, and to reduce the number of pages of
output. NYSDEC used three tubes in parallel and, therefore,
added a column to input data from this additional tube. The
standard format had been designed to account for the daily sample
collection schedule of the College of Staten Island (CSI). Since
NYSDEC collected samples every sixth day, it deleted all dates on
3-1
-------
which samples were not scheduled to be collected. This reduced
the number of outputs for each month and allowed NYSDEC to report
three months of data from a site on each page.
For the VOCs collected in canisters, and for formaldehyde,
metals, and benzo(a)pyrene, only one sample was collected on each
sampling day. Therefore, the format was designed to allow for
the entry of three months of data on one compound at one site on
each page. An example is shown in Table III-3-2. Summary
statistics for each month and for the quarter are calculated and
given in these tables.
The quarterly summary report format developed for the
project is shown in Table III-3-3. The summary statistics
presented include maximum and second highest concentrations,
average concentration, minimum concentration, standard deviation,
number of samples, and number of samples greater than the minimum
detection level (MDL) for the compound. It should be noted that
when a compound was below the MDL, a concentration equal to one
half of the MDL was to be entered into the spreadsheet.
In order to facilitate use of the data, additional summary
formats were developed; they are shown in Tables III-3-4 through
6. Table III-3-4 shows the quarterly and annual average
concentrations for one compound at each site at which it was
measured for the duration of the project. Table III-3-5 is an
example of a report format which rank orders the data on one
compound for each quarter during the Project, so that for each
quarter there is a list of the sites arranged from the one with
the highest concentration to the one with the lowest. Table III-
3-6 is similar to Table III-3-5, but ranks the annual average
concentrations rather than quarterly average concentrations. The
ambient air data in these formats appear as Tables III-3-7
through 73 in the appendices at the back of this volume.
All VOC concentration summary data (annual and quarterly
average data) are available as WordPerfect and Lotus files on
computer diskettes from the National Technical Information
Service (NTIS) as NTIS Accession number PB92-504174. Daily
monitoring data will be accessible on the U.S. EPA Aerometric
Information Retrieval System (AIRS).
3.3 LOGISTICS
Data were to be submitted in the project formats on computer
disk in Lotus within 45 days after the end of each calendar
quarter. The data were also to be checked by each organization
prior to its submittal in order to eliminate data entry errors.
The Data Management Subcommittee was to release data listings for
3-2
-------
each quarter of data. These goals were met with a mixture of
success and failure.
The Data Management Subcommittee fell behind its schedule
for releasing quarterly data listings and did not release any
data until September 1988 when it released data from July 1987
through March 1988. In February of 1989, the data tables were
reviewed for errors from data entry or other sources. Several
errors were found; each organization was asked to review its data
and resubmit it. These actions resulted in higher quality data
in subsequent submittals. Data submittals by the participants
were completed during the summer of 1990. Preparation of the
summary tables followed.
3.4 INITIAL DATA ANALYSIS
In order to guide the efforts of the other subcommittees
responsible for the use of the data, the Data Management
Subcommittee undertook several steps in the evaluation of the
data. These included preparation of graphs of the annual
averages for the second year of the study for a number of the
sampling sites, and plots of the actual daily results in time
series plots. Annual and quarterly average data were tabulated
in Tables III-3-7 through 27. Sites were listed in concentration
rank order in Tables m-3-28 through 48 for the annual average
data. Rank order tables for quarterly average .results are given
in Tables III-3-49 through 69.
The preliminary examination of the tables indicates the
following:
No single monitoring site consistently had the highest
concentrations.
Of the chlorinated hydrocarbons, trichloroethane had the
highest concentrations in both the first and second years of
the project (0.48 ppb and 0.46 ppb, averages of the annual
averages for all sites in each year).
Of the aromatic hydrocarbons, toluene had the highest
concentrations in both the first and second years (3.66 ppb
and 3.33 ppb, averages of the annual averages for all sites
in each year).
Examination of Tables III-3-28 through 48 showed that some
sites consistently had higher annual average concentrations for a
number of compounds. Such sites were studied to determine the
possible impacts of meteorological variables and local sources,
3-3
-------
and/or provide other explanations of the locally higher
concentrations; the results are presented in Section 6, Source
Identification.
For example, annual average concentrations for the Dongan
Hills, Elizabeth, Port Richmond, and Eltingville sites were
typically >1.4 ppb for benzene, and >4 ppb for toluene. The
Carteret and Bayley Seton sites exceeded these levels in one of
the two years. The first four sites mentioned are all located on
heavily-trafficked multi-lane roads or highways; some of the
sites are near the Fresh Kills Landfill; and one is near a
petroleum refinery. Several techniques have been applied to
these data in order to evaluate methods for relating the measured
concentrations to potential sources. The methods tested included
pollutant roses, back trajectory analyses, and studies of the
micro-inventory data.
The Pump Station and the Dongan Hills sites are another
example of how the tables and graphs were used to focus source
identification efforts. The Dongan Hills site is clearly one of
the most impacted for tetrachloroethylene. The site is unique in
that the early site audit reports noted the proximity of several
dry cleaning establishments. The micro-inventory reports for
this site and others have been examined to confirm the degree to
which dry cleaners may have contributed to tetrachloroethylene
concentrations. The Pump station site (near Staten Island Mall)
is another location with high measured tetrachloroethylene
concentrations. Publicly-owned treatment works (POTWs) have been
reported to be sources of some chlorinated hydrocarbons; the
possible relation of these sources to the pumping station
function and the high tetrachloroethylene concentrations measured
at the Pump Station site were pursued.
Figures III-3-1 through 11 show the second-year (October
1988 through September 1989) annual average data for 11 chemicals
at 13 sites. For many compounds in this set of graphs, the
ranges of means for all sites are not large. The three- to five-
fold differences between sites for some chlorinated compounds may
be significant. These differences were evaluated to determine
their statistical significance, and to determine any potential
impacts on the health risk estimates. The intersite differences
in the means are considerably smaller for the aromatic
hydrocarbons. Intersite differences in concentration and
exposure are discussed in Sections 2, Quality Assurance, and 7,
Exposure and Health Assessment, in this volume; and in Volume V.
The data for dichloromethane from NJIT and CSI, with 0 and
25% of the sample concentrations greater than the respective
MDLs, failed the QA review. These organizations reported their
data as evidence for the presence of the compound, or valuable as
an order of magnitude estimate. Only the NYSDEC data are valid
for any quantitative evaluation for dichloromethane.
3-4
-------
The data for trichloromethane (chloroform) and
trichloroethylene (trichloroethene) passed the QA review for all
three organizations; however, the results in Figures III-3-2 and
3 indicate that some problems may have occurred in routine
operations. For both compounds there was very little site-to-
site variation in the annual averages for each of the NJIT and
CSI sites, with the annual average only slightly above the MDL
for some sites; and both organizations reported averages well
below the range of averages for the NYSDEC sites. The relatively
low boiling points of trichloromethane and trichloroethene may
have resulted in collection efficiency problems with the Tenax
absorbers used by NJIT and CSI. Caution should be exercised in
the use of the trichloromethane and trichloroethene results from
NJIT and CSI.
All VOCs with higher boiling points than dichloromethane,
trichlororaethane, and trichloroethene provided satisfactory
evidence of adequate collection efficiencies on both the Tenax
(NJIT and CSI) and trisorbent (NYSDEC) absorber systems.
The data in Figures III-3-12 through 19 show the sample-to-
sample variation in concentration over time for the hydrocarbon
and chlorinated hydrocarbon compounds at four sites. Figure III-
3-20 is a graph of the average concentration for the four sites
on the given days, for sulfur dioxide, toluene, and benzene, for
comparison purposes. The large variations (high peaks, large
maxima) in the hydrocarbon graphs fell on the same sampling dates
throughout the study period shown. The large variations for the
chlorinated compounds were rarely on the same dates.
Correlations for the chlorinated compounds are not apparent from
these graphs.
The ambient concentrations of the aromatic hydrocarbons
(benzene, toluene, m- and p-xylenes, and o-xylene) tended to vary
together over the larger concentration variations, while the
concentrations of the chlorinated compounds tended to vary
independently of each other. The day-by-day coincidence of high
and low values for the aromatic hydrocarbons at four sites
indicates the likelihood that these compounds were emitted from
the same source or a common type of source.
There appears to be no strong seasonal variation in the
ambient concentrations of the compounds shown in these graphs.
Some of the aromatic hydrocarbons appear to show higher
concentrations in the winter months and the lower concentrations
in the spring at some sites. According to a more detailed
examination by CSI1, the CSI data appear to show seasonal
variation for some of the chlorinated compounds.
1 Personal communication of John Oppenheimer to Theo. J. Kneip.
3-5
-------
3.5 COMPARISON TO AMBIENT AIR VOC DATA FOR OTHER LOCATIONS.
3.5.1 Relevant Data Sets
Four data bases were selected for comparison with the SI/NJ
UATAP data. They are the 1988 and 1989 EPA Urban Air Toxics
Monitoring Program (UATMP) studies, the Airborne Toxic Element
and organic Substances (ATEOS) project, and the EPA Total
Exposure Assessment Methodologies (TEAM) studies.
Tables III-3-70a through 70b describe precision, accuracy,
and detection limits, or indicators thereof, for the studies.
Tables III-3-71 through 73 contain data reported in these
studies. These tables address only an 11-VOC subset of the
chemicals in these studies, since these VOCs were the focus of
the initial quantitative risk assessment located in Section 7 of
this volume.
The designs of the studies should be considered when
comparing the reported concentrations. The five studies are
described below in terms of number of sites, number of chemicals,
sampling frequency, collection method(s), analytical detection
methods, organization of sampling and analysis, bases for site
selection, and objective(s).
3.5.1.1 SI/NJ UATAP (Staten Island/New Jersey Urban Air
Toxics Assessment Project)
See Tables III-3-7 through 27.
Sites: 13 ambient air sites for VOCs, 5 sites for metals and
B[a]P, and 2 sites for formaldehyde for the outdoor air
portion of the study. (Piscataway served as an upwind site
for VOCs and formaldehyde; and Highland Park, as an upwind
site for metals and B[a]P. Upwind refers to the W to SW
wind direction, the predominant wind direction for the
project area.) Four indoor and two outdoor sites were used
for the 8-month indoor air portion of the study.
Chemicals: 40 chemicals—21 VOCs2, 17 metals,
benzo[a]pyrene, and formaldehyde.
Sampling frequency; 24-h samples every 6th day; October '87
through September '89. (Only data for the period 10/88
In this tally, m- and p.-xylene were counted as one VOC
since they were not distinguished by the analytical methods
used.
3-6
-------
through 9/89 have been included in this comparison). CSI
sampled daily during certain quarters. Annual averages are
arithmetic averages of all samples; for CSI sites, many more
samples were collected during some quarters than others.
Collection; For VOCs, NJIT and CSI used Tenax as the sole
adsorbent, and NYSDEC used a series of Tenax/Amersorb/carbon
in a single tube as the adsorbent. A combination of
canisters and periodic simultaneous sampling by the three
organizations was used as an indication of accuracy of the
sorbent methods, and as a basis for integration of the
inter-organizational set of data. For particulate matter
and B[a])P, high-volume samplers were used. For
formaldehyde, 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine-coated (DNPH-
coated) silica cartridges were used.
Analysis; For VOCs, NYSDEC and CSI used GC/MS; NJIT used
GC/FID/ECD with confirmation by GC/MS. For metals, all
organizations used atomic absorption spectrophotometry.
Organization: Sites were run by three organizations—6 by
NYSDEC, 5 by NJDEP, 3 by CSI; each organization had a
different lab analyze samples collected at its sites.
Site selection; Residential neighborhood complaints,
availability, accessibility, security, absence of known
point sources nearby, geographic distribution, proximity to
breathing zone, in general conforming to the USEPA air
monitoring siting requirements.
Objectives; Characterization of ambient air quality, risk
assessment, and source identification. Further detail may
be found in the nine objectives stated in Volume II of the
SI/NJ UATAP project report.
3.5.1.2 1988 and 1989 UATMP (Urban Air Toxics Monitoring
Program, USEPA)
See Tables III-3-72a through 72c. Metals and B[a]P data for
the 1988 UATMP study were available from the AIRS
(Aerometric Information Retrieval System) database.
Sites: 19 sites operated in the 1988 study (9/24/87 through
10/6/88). 14 sites operated in 1989 study (1/22/89 through
1/17/90)—6 sites were the same as in the 1988 study, and 8
sites were new. See tables for site locations.
Chemicals: 38 gaseous organic compounds; and metals, B[a]P,
and carbonyl compounds.
3-7
-------
Sampling frequency: 24-h samples every 12 days.
Annual arithmetic averages are listed in the tables.
Collection; For VQCs, stainless steel canisters. For
particulate matter, high-volume filters. For carbonyl
compounds, DNPH-coated silica cartridges.
Analysis; GC/MD, with 3 detectors for identification (ECD,
PID, FID)3; FID for most quantitation, ECD for most
halogenated compounds. GC/MS for identification
confirmation of GC/MD results.
Organization; A contractor set up the sites. State or local
personnel collected samples and sent them to the EPA
contractor. The contractor analyzed all samples.
Site selection; OAQPS (Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards) guidelines, with site selection by Regional EPA
offices and State offices together.
Objective; Screening to help state and local agencies
determine if an air toxics problem existed, assess air
quality, provide focus for follow-up studies and risk
reduction activities.
3.5.1.3 ATEOS (Airborne Toxic Element and Organic Substances
project)
See Table III-3-73.
Sites; 4 New Jersey sites—Elizabeth, Newark, Camden,
Ringwood.
Chemicals; 24 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH's), 6
aromatics, 16 chlorinated hydrocarbons, 9 metals,
nitrobenzene/ 1,4-dioxane, inhalable particulate matter < 15
^m (aerodynamic diameter), fine particulate matter £ 2.5 pm,
carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, and sulfate.
Sampling frequency; 24-h samples on 39 consecutive days at
each site over a 6-week period; this regimen was implemented
4 times during 3 calendar years as follows—7/6 to 8/14/81,
1/18 to 2/25/82, 7/6 to 8/14/82, and 1/17 to 2/25/83. The
averages shown are seasonal geometric means.
GC » gas chromatograph, MD * multi-detector. ECD * electron
capture detector. PID = photoionization detector.
FID = flame ionization detector. MS = mass spectrometer.
3-8
-------
Collection; For VOCs, Tenax/Spherocarb. For metals, size-
selective samplers (two at < 15 /im, one at < 2.5 /m) at each
site and operated at pre-determined flow rates.
Analysis; GC with MS confirmation for VOCs. Thin-layer
chromatographic separation followed by HPLC (high-pressure
liquid chromatography) for PAH. Atomic absorption
spectrophotometry for metals.
Organization; The Institute of Environmental Medicine, New
York University, coordinated and performed sampling and
sample preparation; local personnel inserted and removed
filters for sampling, and shipped samples to NYU. NYU
analyzed for metals and some PAH's as a quality assurance
check. NJIT analyzed for VOCs and PAHs.
site selection; High population density, proximity to large
centers with commercial and/or industrial activities,
proximity to important transportation arteries, sites
potentially affected by different types of sources.
Objective; Determine the concentrations and seasonal
distribution patterns and sources of the biologically-active
fraction of the atmospheric aerosol and VOC, analyze
pollution episodes for composition and duration, identify
inter-urban and rural differences.
3.5.1.4 TEAM Study (Total Exposure Assessment
Methodology Study)
See Table III-3-73.
Sites; 3 locations in Phase II of study—New Jersey
(Elizabeth-Bayonne area), North Carolina, and North Dakota.
Chemicals; 11 VOCs collected at each site.
Sample frequency; 12-h day and night samples in three
seasons—86 samples in Fall 1981; 60 samples in Summer 1982;
9 samples in Winter 1983. Arithmetic means are provided in
1982 and 1983 for the Fall 1981 the reported concentrations
are from weighted frequency distributions.
Collection; Collection was achieved using personal samples
Tenax-GC at 30 ml/minute; the sampler was set up in a
backyard or near the participating homes. The same sampler
used for dichloromethane, to calculate the concentration
when the breakthrough occurred, the breakthrough volume was
used rather than sample volume.
3-9
-------
Analysis; Capillary GC/MS analysis with combination of
manual and automatic analyses of spectra. Improvements in
sampling and analysis were made through the course of the
study. Use of the terms limit of detection (LOD),
quantitation limit (QL), and trace. Non-detection means <
LOD. Trace means > LOD, but < QL. The QL is approximately
equal to four times the LOD. Measurable means > QL.
Organization; Primary contractor was Research Triangle
Institute, with audits by EPA's Environmental Monitoring
Systems Laboratory, RTP.
Site selection; Based on stratified probability sample of
5500 households in 108 areas in Elizabeth and Bayonne;
intended to represent 128,000 members of target population—
residents > 6 years of age as of Fall 1981. Stratification
based on age, socio-economic status, occupation, and
proximity to major point sources. Greensboro, NC, and
Devils Lake, ND, were selected for comparison to the NJ
location. Greensboro is similar in size of population, but
lacks chemical manufacturing and petroleum refining
industries. Devils Lake is a small, rural agricultural
town.
Objective; Develop methods to measure individual total
exposure and resulting body burden of toxic and carcinogenic
chemicals; and apply those methods to estimate exposure and
body burdens of urban populations in several cities.
3.5.2 Inter-studv Comparisons
The ranges of concentrations reported in the studies cited
are generally similar to the data obtained for the SI/NJ UATAP
sites. The tables are provided for the use of readers interested
in detailed information as well as for use by the members of the
project.
For rapid appreciation of the comparability of the data sets
from the 1989 UATMP and the second year of the SI/NJ UATAP, a set
of graphs has been prepared. Figures III-3-21 through 30 depict
the following for the 11 VOCs: the annual average concentrations
for the 1989 UATMP sites and for the SI/NJ UATAP sites, the
average of the annual average concentrations for all the SI/NJ
UATAP sites, and the average of the annual average concentrations
for all the 1989 UATMP sites. The data have been plotted in
order of concentration by location for each of the VOCs. The
site codes for these graphs are given in Table III-3-74.
The SI/NJ UATAP data clearly fit with those for the rest of
the country in these graphs. For all but two chemicals, the data
3-10
-------
point representing the average of the SI/NJ UATAP site annual
averages falls in the mid-range of the values from the UATMP
individual site averages. In most cases, the highest annual
averages are from the UATMP data set.
The data for dichloromethane from this project are those
from NYSDEC, which did not have a collection efficiency problem.
This compounds received little further attention in the initial
data analysis because of the limited data available.
The highest concentrations for tetrachloroethylene were
measured at SI/NJ UATAP sites—Dongan Hills and the Pump Station
sites; this was discussed earlier in Section 3. At the latter
site, adjacent to a sewage pumping station, annual average
concentrations for chloroform and trichloroethene were high, as
well. At the Dongan Hills site, annual average concentrations
were high for benzene and m- and p-xylene, and relatively high
for toluene.
Section 7 of this volume presents additional comparisons of
the UATMP and SI/NJ UATAP data.
3.6 CONCLUSIONS.
The quality-assured data in a reduced format are available
from National Technical Information Services (NTIS) on a computer
diskette.
The initial examination of the data led to a number of
findings. The bulk of the SI/NJ data are comparable to data for
a number of sites in a national study of a similar nature. None
of the SI/NJ UATAP sites is consistently high in any one
pollutant within the project data set. However, patterns emerge
indicating high annual average results of possible significance
in relation to sources. Further studies of these data have been
undertaken to evaluate methods for determining source
relationships and to obtain preliminary results concerning such
relationships.
Seasonal variations may occur for the aromatic hydrocarbons,
but these do not appear to occur with the chlorinated
hydrocarbons. Strong commonality is apparent in the occurrence
of peak concentrations for the hydrocarbons, but not for the
chlorinated hydrocarbons. The values for tetrachloroethylene at
Dongan Hills and the Pump Station sites are unusually high
relative to other sites in this project, and relative to the
nation-wide UATMP data set, as well. These and other site-to-
site variations have been studied by the use of pollutant rose
3-11
-------
and back trajectory analyses, and by more detailed, statistical
methods.
3.8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This section was prepared by Mr. Rudolph K. Kapichak,
Dr. Theo. J. Kneip, Ms. Carol Bellizzi, Mr. Robert Kelly, Mr.
Stan Stephansen, Mr. Richard Ruvo, Ms. Lauren Bradford, and Mr.
Ethan Kibbe of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region II. Mr. Kevin Culligan of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region II organized the project summary data
onto computer diskettes available through NTIS.
3.8 REFERENCES
Harkov, R.; Lioy, P.J.; Daisey, J.M.; Greenberg, A.; Darack,
F.; Bozzelli, J.W.; Kebbekus, B. (1986) Quality control for
noncriteria air pollutants: results from the ATEOS project.
J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 36: 388-392.
Lioy P. J.; Daisey, J. M. (1987) Toxic air pollution, a
comprehensive study of non-criteria air pollutants. Ann
Arbor, MI:Lewis Publishers, Inc.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1987) The total
exposure assessment methodology (TEAM) study: summary and
analysis: Volume I. Washington, DC: Office of Acid
Deposition, Environmental Monitoring and Quality Assurance;
EPA report no. EPA/600/6-87/002a.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989) 1988 Nonmethane
Organic Compound Monitoring Program, final report, volume
II: Urban Air Toxics Monitoring Program. Research Triangle
Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; EPA
report no. EPA-450/4-89-005.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1990) 1989 Urban Air
Toxics Monitoring Program, draft final report. Research
Triangle Park, NC: office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards; EPA report no. 68D80014.
Wallace, L.A. (1987) Project summary, the total exposure
assessment methodology (TEAM) study. Washington, DC:U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Acid Deposition,
Environmental Monitoring and Quality Assurance; EPA report
no. EPA/600/S6-87/002.
3-12
-------
Table III-3-1: FORMAT FOR VOCs COLLECTED ON SORBENTS
Agency: College of Staten Island
Site: Bayley Seton Hospital - Ground Level
Site #: NY 8
Flow Rate Tube 1: 8 cc/min
Pollutant Benzene
Sampling Code: 0
HDL: 0.13 ppb low flow and 0.06 ppb high flow
Month, year: March 89
Date Tube 1 FC Tube 2 FC
Tube 2: 16 cc/min
CAS #: 71-43-2
Analytical Code: J
Units: ppb
Blank
FC
2 Tube Av FC
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
* of Obs:
Max Val:
Arth Mean:
Min Val:
0.83
1.95
1.07
1.07
1.07
0.48
0.78
0.58
0.95
2.31
0.94
"0.78
0.72
sc
sc
0.80
0.64
0.55
0.73
0.57
0.60
1.16
0.75
1.00
0.80
sa
1.41
0.98
sa
0.54
0.79
27
2.31
0.92
0.48
0.88
2.00
1.18
1.18
1.25
0.55
0.88
0.56
1.12
3.03
1.10
0.83
sa
sc
sc
1.06
0.54
0.69
0.82
0.65
0.68
1.32
0.77
1.05
0.96
1.36
1.67
0.65
sa
1.04
1.23
27
3.03
1.08
0.54
0.86
1.97
1.13
1.13
1.16
0.52
0.83
0.57
1.03
2.67
1.02
0.81
0.72
0.93
0.59
0.62
0.77
0.61
0.64
1.24
0.76
1.03
0.88
1.36
1.54
0.81
0.79
1.01
28
2.67
1.00
0.52
3-13
-------
Table III-3-2: FORMAT FOR CANISTER VOC SAMPLES, AND FOR FORMALDEHYDE,
METALS, AND BENZO[a]PYRENE
Agency: NJDEP-NJIT
Site: Elizabeth, NJ
SAROAD #: NJ-A
Pollutant: Benzene CAS *: 71-43-2
Sampling Code: B Analytical code: R
MDL: 0.01 PPB Units: PPB
Quarter Beginning: October, 1968
Date Oct., 88 FC Nov., 88 FC Dec., 88 FC
1
2
3
4
5 0.82 1.01
6 0.82
7
8
9
10
11 0.85 0.50
12 0.45
13
U
15
16
17 0.90 SC
18 1.25
19
20
21
22
23 1.39 1.82
24 1.08
25
26
27
28
29 0.69 1.06
30 0.71
31
* of Obs: 5$4
Max Value: 1.25 1.39 1.82
Arith. Mean: 0.86 0.93 1.10
Min Value: 0.45 0.69 0.50
# Obs in Otr: 14
Otr Arth Mean: 0.96
3-14
-------
Table III-3-3: QUARTERLY SUMMARY REPORT FORMAT
QUARTER BEGINNING: JANUARY 1989
CHEMICAL: BENZENE
MOL: 0.20
SITE
SUSAN UAGNER
PS-26
PORT RICHMOND
TOTTENV1LLE
GREAT KILLS
PUNP STATION
* OBS.
12.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
12.00
13.00
AVG.
STD. DEV. 1ST MAX 2ND MAX
MIN
> MDL
1.07
1.46
1.52
1.04
1.09
1.28
0.71
0.90
0.85
0.63
0.70
0.86
2.95
3.34
3.57
2.20
2.47
3.02
1.69
2.76
2.51
2.15
2.30
2.78
0.31
0.39
0.50
0.34
0.36
0.38
12.00
13.00
13.00
13.00
12.00
13.00
QUARTER BEGINNING: APRIL 1989
CHEMICAL:
MDL:
SITE
SUSAN UAGNER
PS-26
PORT RICHMOND
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMP STATION
0.20
BENZENE
* OBS.
12.00
13.00
12.00
13.00
12.00
13.00
AVG.
0.69
1.17
1.52
0.67
0.84
1.11
STD. DEV. 1ST MAX 2ND MAX
MIN
> MDL
0.36
1.00
1.07
0.50
0.55
0.73
1.40
3.76
3.50
2.02
1.86
2.72
1.27
2.22
3.26
1.27
1.80
2.20
0.14
0.10
0.25
0.19
0.35
0.28
12.00
13.00
12.00
13.00
12.00
13.00
QUARTER BEGINNING: JULY 1989
CHEMICAL: BENZENE
MOL: 0.20
SITE
SUSAN UAGNER
PS-26
PORT RICHMOND
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMP STATION
OBS.
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
AVG.
STD. DEV. 1ST MAX 2ND MAX
NIN
> MOL
0.69
1.39
1.21
0.91
0.86
1.26
0.29
0.92
0.44
0.43
0.49
0.66
1.12
3.59
2.22
1.67
2.05
2.88
1.10
3.19
2.18
1.60
1.62
2.56
0.18
0.55
0.60
0.31
0.29
0.39
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
15.00
3-15
-------
Table 1II-3-4
TOLUENE - C6H5CH3 (METHYL BENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN UAGMER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEV SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE * OF ARITH. MEAN • OF ARITH. MEAN t OF ARITIU MEAN * OF ARITH.I MEAN * OF ARITH^ MEAN
0 SAMPLES SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
13
13
10
9
87
88
86
2.83
1.88
3.22
3.74
4.71
5.70
5.19
14
14
13
14
82
57
55
1.70
2.32
3.20
4.65
4.24
5.19
5.67
14
3
13
13
15
80
79
78
3.01
2.90
1.46
2.17
2.67
2.93
2.71
2.94
15
15
10
4
4
79
68
67
5.02
5.24
2.07
3.29
3.63
4.14
3.68
4.18
56
18
50
40
42
328
292
286
3.18
4.85
1.93
2.88
3.65
4.02
4.32
4.43
TOLUENE - C6H5CH3 (METHYL BENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEV SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
CITE * nr *RITH MEAN « OF ARITH. MEAN # OF ARITH. MEAN # OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
S1T SA^ES "Epb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
15
15
11
13
14
14
14
11
83
79
75
4.18
4.59
1.76
3.21
3.56
3.52
2.78
2.56
3.48
3.55
4.09
11
14
10
13
12
13
13
13
12
13
86
71
83
5.57
4.23
4.14
3.42
3.13
4.55
4.72
4.26
3.27
3.34
3.16
3.60
4.46
13
15
12
15
12
13
12
13
12
13
8
7
6
2.82
2.83
2.05
1.27
2.13
3.38
4.36
3.49
2.58
2.17
2.39
1.95
2.59
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
16
19
18
2.90
2.82
2.69
1.80
2.57
4.32
4.39
4.17
2.95
3.09
2.22
3.09
2.99
53
58
36
42
50
54
54
55
53
52
193
176
182
3.80
3.62
2.88
2.11
2.42
3.88
4.25
3.87
2.89
2.81
3.19
3.45
4.10
3-16
-------
TOLUENE - C.HtCH, (METHYL BENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEV SETOH NOSP
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
TOTTENVILLE
PUMPING STATION
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
5.70
5.19
4.71
3.74
3.22
2.83
1.88
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
CARTERET
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
PI SCATAWAY
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
5.67
5.19
4.65
4.24
3.20
2.32
1.70
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
CARTERET
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELIZABETH
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
3.01
2.94
2.93
2.90
2.71
2.67
2,17
1.46
SITE
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
5.24
5.02
4.18
4.14
3.68
3.63
3.29
2.07
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
SITE
ARITH. MEAN
ARITH. MEAN
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
DONGAN HILLS
PORT RICHMOND PO
ELTINGVILLE
PUMPING STATION
BAYLEV SETON HOSP
PS 26
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
4.59
4.18
4.09
3.56
3.55
3.52
3.48
3.21
2.78
2.56
1.76
SITE
CARTERET
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
DONGAN HILLS
PUMPING STATION
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
ELTINGVILLE
PISCATAUAY
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
SUSAN UAGNER HS
5.57
4.72
.55
.46
.26
.23
.14
.60
.42
.34
3.27
3.16
3.13
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
PS 26
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
DONGAN HILLS
GREAT KILLS
BAYIEY SETON HOSP
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELTINGVILLE
PISCATAUAY
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
4.36 PORT RICHMOND PO
3.49 PS 26
3.38 PUMPING STATION
2.83 ELTINGVILLE
2.82 TOTTENVILLE
2.59 DONGAN HILLS
2.58 GREAT KILLS
2.39 CARTERET
2.17 ELIZABETH
2.13 SEUAREN
2.05 SUSAN UAGNER HS
1.95 BAYLEY SETON HOSP
1.27 PISCATAUAY
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
4.39
4.32
4.17
3.09
3.09
2.99
2.95
2.90
2.82
2.69
2.57
2.22
1.80
3-17
-------
Table III-3-6
TOLUENE - C6H5CH3 (METHYL BENZENE)
SITE
ELIZABETH
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
PORT RICHMOND PO
CARTERET
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
DONGAN HILLS
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
GREAT KILLS
SEWAREN
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PISCATAWAY
TIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
4.85
4.43
4.32
4.02
3.65
3.18
2.88
1.93
SITE
#
A
6
3
8
5
B
2
1
9
4
7
D
C
# OF
SAMPLES
18
286
292
328
43
56
40
50
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
4.25
4.10
3.88
3.87
3.80
3.62
3.45
3.19
2.89
2.88
2.81
2.42
2.11
SITE
#
5
6
2
7
B
A
3
8
4
C
9
1
D
# OF
SAMPLES
54
182
54
55
53
58
176
193
53
36
52
50
42
3-18
-------
Figure III-3-1
0.8 -
O 0.6 -
LU
O
O
DICHLOROMETHANE
2ND YEAR AVERAGES
sw
NE
MONITORING AGENCY
TOTTCNVliE
Pl**>ST*TK3N QHCATKLLS POWT MCHMCXO SUSAN WAQCS)
NYSDEC
3-19
-------
FIGURES III - 3 - 1
THROUGH III-3-11
SECOND YEAR AVERAGES
FOR POLLUTANTS BY LOCATION
AND MONITORING AGENCY
(Concentration vs. Site)
3-20
-------
Figure III-3-2
0.16
TRICHLOROMETHANE
(CHLOROFORM)
2ND YEAR AVERAGES
sw
NE
MONITORING AGENCY
NJIT
NYSDEC
CSI
3-21
-------
Figure III-3-3
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
(TRICHLOROETHENE)
2ND YEAR AVERAGES
0.3
sw
NE
MONITORING AGENCY
I
0.8
0.2
on
0.1
0 09
•••• mill •••
NJIT
NYSDEC
CSI
3-22
-------
Figure III-3-4
TETRACHLOROMETHANE
(CARBON TETRACHLORIDE)
2ND YEAR AVERAGES
0.2
SW
NE
MONITORING AGENCY
I
0.3
O.tt
0.1
0 08
llll Illlll III
NJIT
NYSDEC
CSI
3-23
-------
Figure III-3-5
0.6
1,1,1 TRICHLOROETHANE
(METHYL CHLOROFORM)
2ND YEAR AVERAGES
SW
NE
MONITORING AGENCY
NJIT
NYSDEC
OSI
3-25
-------
Figure III-3-6
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
2ND YEAR AVERAGES
1.2
SW NE
MONITORING AGENCY
1.2
1
O.t
0 •
0.4
03
I
•••• ••!••• •••
+**+*>* ^^ &^&>&i** ***&*$***
NJIT NYSDEC CSI
3-26
-------
Figure III-3-7
1.2
HEXANE
2ND YEAR AVERAGES
SW
NE
MONITORING AGENCY
B.-nMOrvUJ DOMQANHLLS
CSI
3-27
-------
Figure III-3-8
TOLUENE
2ND YEAR AVERAGES
sw
NE
MONITORING AGENCY
NJIT
NYSDEC
CS!
3-28
-------
Figure III-3-9
BENZENE
2ND YEAR AVERAGES
2.6
1.6
0.6
ilillllhl.ll
SW NE
MONITORING AGENCY
28
ill! illili ill
NJIT NYSDEC CSI
3-29
-------
Figure III-3-10
M, P-XYLENE
2ND YEAR AVERAGES
•"xyj^vs;
S\N NE
MONITORING AGENCY
2 i
I
1.6
0.6
Illli ill
NJIT NYSDEC CSI
3-30
-------
FIGURES III-3-12
THROUGH III-3-20
CONCENTRATION VS. SAMPLE DATE
3-31
-------
Benzene
4 Sites
Bayley Seton
Six Day Intervals (1988-89)
'JQ
C
'1
rt>
I
UJ
I
3-32
-------
Toluene
4 Sites
12
10
8
Bayley Seton
Carteret
PS 28
Pump Station
K
UJ
u. u.
Six Day Intervals (1988-89)
3-33
-------
CO
1.2
1
0.8
0.6
o
o
O 0.4
0.2
0
O-xylene
4 Sites
SB • • •
Bayley Seton
Carters*
PS 26
Pump Station
5
M
[I
i
i
>—
£•
Six Day Intervals (1988-89)
3-34
-------
M and P-Xylene
4 Sites
JO
a
CO
t!
8 2
o
O
I I I
1,1
Bayley Seton
Carteret
PS 26
Pump Station
=
H
I
I
U
U
Six Day Intervals (1988-89)
3-35
-------
0.8
o.e
CO
£
§ 0.4
O
O
0.2
Chloroform
4 Sites
•
n
H
n
i
i
II
I*
ii
» i
I/
i
-.-i-,''i ,vr. i Vi-rrv-i-i'l . %i-
Bayley Seton
Carteret
PS 26
Pump Station
•-
-
•
-
n
—
Six Day Intervals (1988-89)
3-36
-------
JD
^Q.
O
0.6
0.6
0.4
ra
p
ca
£
8
o
O
o
to
p
L*
Carbon Tetrachloride
Four Sites
i . i . i . i .
(DCDQv-OlOKCftO
-g' *".*?*"! 'T d *"i ^ ^
coioN.^-co^-c£> to o
• T- CM »- CM •T-CJT-
I
I
I
II
fl
l
^-CM
CM •*~
Six Day Intervals (1988-89)
Bayley Seton
Carteret
PS 26
Pump Station
OJ
3-36
-------
6
I.
O 2
O
Tetrachloroethylene
4 Sites
>,
I V
I
!\
II
n
II
II
' »
• i
A£
Six Day Intervals (1986-69)
Bayley Seton
Carteret
PS 26
Pump Station
1C
N
I
-
3-38
-------
1.5
.a
g
g
^ 1
o
O
0.5 -
1,1.1 Trichloroethane
4 Sites
k t '•
I . I . I . I ? I • I ! I • I •
i . i . i . i
Bayley Seton
Carteret
PS 26
Pump Statkxi
•
e
-
i
i
v~
i
^
Six Day Intervals (1988-89)
3-39
-------
14
12 h
10
I a
£
8 6
o
2
0
Sulfur Dioxide
(Average 4 sites, not to scale)
Toluene + Benzene (Site: PS 26)
i . I i I i I i l
..,••' v?
i . i i
Six Day Intervals (1988-89)
Sulfur Dioxide
Toluene
Benzene
-
i-j-
E
-
it
UJ
3-40
-------
TABLE 111-3-70 : PRECISION, ACCURACY. AMD DETECTION LIMITS FOR SELECTED VOC'S - COMPARISON OF SI/NJ UATAP TO OTHER STUDIES
Precision for TOC's
Range of X coeff
of variation
19&8 UATHP
0.00 to
\30.fl81
Accuracy (X bias) for VOC's
Range of X bias
Oectection Units, pobv
OichloroMthane
Tr ichlorowe thane
Tet rachIoroaethane
Trichloroethytene
letrachtoroethylene
Nexane
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene, o-**
Xylene, «- and p-
EthyIbenzene
See footnote
0.11
0.006
0.001
0.004
0.07
0.04
0.02
0.02**
0.04
0.02
19fl9 UATHP
0.23 to
72. IS2
-35 to
75Z
0.11
0.006
0.001
0.044
0.07
-
0.04
0.02
0.02**
0.04
0.02
SI/HJ UATAP
See footnote 3.
First year: -98 to 205
Second year: -99 to 59,
typically -50 to 50?.
HYSDEC MJIT CSI
O.W. 0.01 (O.J., 0.2)
0.04 0.01 0.02, O.Ot
0.06 0.05 0.04, 0.01
0.02 0.01 0.02, 0.01
0.04 0.01 0.05, 0.03
0.01 0.01, 0.05
0.20 0.01 0.13, 0.06
0.10 0.01 0.4, 0.2
0.04 0.01 0.2, 0.1
0.04 0.01 0.4, 0.2
0.04 - 0.2, 0.1
ATEOS
-60 to 604
See footnote 8.
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
( Quant i-
tatioo
Unit)'
(0.10)
(0.10)
(0.10)
(0.10)
(0.10)
(0.05)
(0.05)
(0.05)
(0.05)
(0.05)
TEAM
15 to
Values < 1 ug/n3
as not reliably
quantitated.
Quant itation limit
as four tines the
Unit of detection.
3-41
-------
TABLE III-3-70 . CONTINUED
Footnotes;
1 Table 11-25. U.S. EPA (1989).
2 Table 4-22, U.S. EPA (1990).
3 Precision estimates were obtained from either collocated distributed-volume or duplicate samples. These data showed that collocated
samples agreed with each other within 10 to 30X. A detailed discussion of sample precision, with accompanying data, is presented
individually by each of the sampling/analytical organizations in their quality assurance reports in Volume VI of the SI/NJ UATAP report.
4 JAPCA (1986).
5 Table 11, U.S. EPA (1987).
6 Inaccuracy of calibration standards prepared in-house led to calculated X biases > 30X.
Late in study, change to vendor-certified gas led to calculated average X biases well within
the + 30X range regarded as adequate.
7 If.the bias for NYSDEC's 1,1,1-trichloroethane data were omitted, the range of bias would be -53 to 59X.
8 No appropriate NBS standard materials were available (JAPCA, 1986).
* Approximately three tines the detection noise level. See Table 14-4, Lioy et al. (1987).
Estimated instrument detection limits.
** Co-elution with styrene.
3-42
-------
TABLE 111-3-71; COMPARISON OF REPORTED 1988 AND 1989 UATMP AND SI/MJ UATAP VOC CONCENTRATIONS
OichIoromethane
T r i chIoromethane
Tetrachloromethane
Trichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Hexane
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene, o-
Xylene, m- and p-
Ethylbenzene
Range for SI/NJ UATAP annual avgs..
10/88-9/89 (excludng Piscatauay)**
(Ref: Data summaries of 8/16/90.)
mm.
0.47
0.02
0.09
0.04
0.17
0.77
0.77
2.42
0.30
0.92
0.50
max.
0.93
0.15
0.16
0.27
1.09
1.08
1.96
4.25
0.55
2.48
0.66
median
0.68
0.05
0.12
0.08
0.22
0.88
1.31
3.54
0.39
1.42
0.53
(* of sites)
(6) ***
(12)
(12)
(12)
(12)
(6)
(12)
(12)
(12)
(12)
(3)
SI/MJ UATAP
Piscatauay
10/88 to 9/89
annual avg.
0.02
0.11
0.05
0.13
0.50
0.97
2.11
0.24
0.52
Range for 1988 UATMP
annual averages
for 19 urban areas
min.
0.06
0.01
0.004
0.01
0.04
0.32
1.60
0.28
1.43
0.16
max.
0.73
3.25
0.05
1.57
4.00
3.41
15.66
2.41
8.45
5.77
median
0.44 (13)
0.10 (15)
0.01 (8)
0.06 (18)
0.07 (19)
0.87 (19)
2.64 (19)
0.85 (19)*
3.53 (19)
0.39 (19)
Range for 1989 UATMP
annual averages
for 14 urban areas
min.
0.13
0.004
0.13
0.01
0.07
0.60
1.19
0.024
0.67
0.12
max.
4.09
2.61
0.24
0.89
0.39
3.97
15.33
2.43
6.95
1.37
median
0.21
0.04
0.19
0.16
0.17
1.72
3.58
0.71
2.34
0.44
Notes: Statistical significance of differences among reported concentrations has not been determined.
Computation of the annual averages employed half the minimum detection limit in cases where
the subject chemical was not detected, if the compound was detected at least once at the given site.
* Styrene/o-xylene co-eluted.
«* Including sites with > 35 samples in the annual average. SI/NJ UATAP annual averages are from data
*** NJIT and CSt data were excluded in arriving at this tally.
Compound not included in the study.
-- Submitted data not good; inappropriate detection method.
ries dated 8/16/90.
3-43
-------
TABLE ni-3-72a; UATMP VOC ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS
1988 UATMP
Ofchloromethane
Trichloromethane
T et rachIoromethane
Trichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Hexane
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene, o-
Xylene, m- and p-
Ethylbenzene
(40)
Hammond. IN
0.15 (1)
0.32 (6)
(0)
0.05 (2)
0.05 (1)
0.86 (20)
2.44 (39)
0.47 (28)*
2.28 (35)
0.16 (11)
(35)
Detroit. MI
0.51 (1)
(0)
(0)
0.03 (2)
0.50 (8)
0.99 (19)
3.16 (32)
0.69 (27)*
4.25 (35)
0.35 (14)
(38)
Dearborn. HI
(0)
0.10 (2)
0.01 (1)
0.03 (2)
0.05 (5)
0.83 (27)
1.60 (37)
0.47 (25)
2.68 (36)
0.32 (16)
(39)
Cleveland. OH
0.67 (5)
0.16 (1)
(0)
0.34 (10)
0.47 (12)
1.74 (27)
3.25 (37)
2.41 (35)*
3.22 (37)
0.41 (17)
(34)
Chicago, IL
(Carver H.S. and
Washington H.S.)
0.44 (3)
(0)
0.01 (1)
0.04 (5)
4.00 (9)
0.85 (25)
15.66 (33)
0.87 (28>*
4.59 (34)
0.68 (20)
(42)
Burlington. VT
0.06 (1)
0.07 (3)
0.005(1)
(0)
0.07 (7)
0.82 (27)
2.51 (41)
1.03 (36)*
4.25 (42)
0.41 (16)
(39)
Baton Rouge, LA
(0)
0.13 (1)
(0)
0.06 (3)
0.05 (3)
0.87 (33)
2.05 (37)
0.85 (30)
1.92 (33)
0.76 (13)
1989 UATMP
Dichtoromethane
Trichloromethane
Tetractiloromethane
T r i chloroethyI ene
Tetrachloroethylene
Hexane
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene, o-
Xylene, m- and p-
EthyIbenzene
Example of hou to read this table:
(32)
Camden. NJ
(0)
0.14 (2)
0.18 (32)
0.02 (5)
0.20 (13)
1.83 (32)
4.03 (32)
0.85 (32)
2.46 (32)
0.42 (32)
(31)
Ft. Lauder-
dale. Fl
(0)
0.02 (3)
0.13 (30)
0.01 (6)
0.15 (12)
1.83 (31)
4.86 (31)
1.75 (31)
3.45 (31)
0.58 (31)
Dearborn. HI
(7)
Pensacola. fL
(0)
0.12 (1)
0.14 (7)
0.32 (2)
(0)
0.6 (7)
1.19 (7)
0.24 (7)
0,67 (7)
0.12 (7)
-Total # of valid samples
(27)
Chicago, IL
(Carver H.S.
Washington H.S.)
4.09 (13)
0.09 (6)
0.24 (27)
0.61 (20)
0.17 (12)
3.37 (27)
7.43 (27)
1.93 (27)
6.42 (27)
1.05 (27)
and (30)
St. Louis. HO
0.19 (1)
0.04 (4)
0.19 (30)
0.13 (16)
0.39 (15)
3.97 (30)
6.22 (30)
1.62 (30)
5.91 (30)
1.03 (30)
(31)
Baton Rouge. LA
(0)
0.11 (12)
0.20 (31)
0.03 (6)
0.10 (16)
1.62 (31)
1.88 (31)
0.64 (31)
1.88 (31)
0.41 (31)
(0) < Chemical was not identified at this site. Annual avg. not computed
0.10 (2) < Chemical was identified in 2 samples. Annual avg. was 0.1 ppbv.
0.01 (1) Half the mdl was used as the cone, of 36 of the 38 samples.
0.03 (2)
0.05 (5)
< Chemical was not included in study.
3-44
-------
TABLE Hl-3-T2bi UATHP VOC ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCEKTRAT10MS (CONTINUED)
198ft UATHP
Dichloromethane
Trichtoromethane
Tetrachloromethane
TrichIoroethy1ene
Tetrachloroethylene
Hexane
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene. o-
Xylene, «- and p-
Ethylbenzene
(38)
Birmingham
Alabama
(0)
(0)
(0)
0.01 (1)
0.06 (5)
1.61 (31)
2.64 (36)
0.97 (32)*
4.18 (37)
5.77 (13)
(40)
Atlanta GA
0.63 (6)
0.16 (3)
0.004(1)
1.09 (3)
0.11 (11)
0.72 (29)
2.10 (34)
0.63 (29)*
3.22 (36)
0.21 (14)
(34)
Port Huron. MI
0.12 (1)
0.70 (7)
0.02 (2)
0.35 (12)
O.OS (3)
0.65 (20)
2.16 (28)
0.28 (21)*
1.70 (30)
0.23 (13)
(39)
Portland. OR
0.17 (1)
0.03 (3)
0.02 (2)
0.06 (2)
0.93 (34)
2.41 (38)
0.74 (29)*
4.10 (36)
0.31 (13)
(36)
Miami. FLA.
0.30 (2)
3.25 (5)
0.01 (1)
1.57 (22)
0.19 (7)
0.83 (33)
4.63 (35)
1.62 (34)*
4.63 (32)
0.55 (17)
(39)
Houston. TX
(0)
0.02 (1)
(0)
0.04 (1)
0.07 (3)
1.38 (36)
5.80 (39)
1.28 (35)*
4.19 (39)
0.54 (19)
1989 UATHP
Dichloropethane
Trichloromethane
Tet rachloromethane
TrIchIoroethyIene
Tetrachloroethylene
Hexane
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene, o-
Xylene, »- and p-
Ethylbenzene
(27)
Washington
DC. #1
0.19 (1)
0.01 (3)
0.15 (27)
0.02 (8)
0.23 (9)
1.38 (27)
2.73 (27)
0.61 (27)
1.81 (27)
0.33 (27)
(27)
Washington
DC §2
(0)
0.01 (2)
0.16 (27)
0.03 (7)
0.22 (13)
2.08 (27)
4.94 (27)
1.25 (27)
3.60 (27)
0.67 (27)
(31)
Uichita. KA *1
0.21 (1)
0.01 (3)
0.20 (31)
0.35 (22)
0.07 (12)
0.91 (31)
1.37 (31)
0.35 (31)
1.14 (31)
0.20 (31)
(31)
Uichita. KA *2
0.53 (5)
0.09 (3)
0.24 (31)
0.18 (17)
0.11 (15)
1.07 (31)
1.71 (31)
0.51 (31)
1.39 (31)
0.25 (31)
(33)
Hi ami. FLA.
2.21 (11)
0.03 (7)
0.14 (32)
0.89 (29)
0.20 (18)
1.47 (33)
4.66 (33)
1.27 (33)
3.33 (33)
0.55 (33)
(34)
Houston. TX
0.14 (1)
0.08 (8)
0.23 (34)
0.03 (3)
0.09 (15)
2.35 (34)
3.12 (34)
0.77 (34)
2.22 (34)
0.45 (24)
3-45
-------
TABLE HI-3-72c; UATMP VOC ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS (CONTINUED)
1988 UATMP
Dichloronethane
Trichloromethane
Tet rach t oromethane
Trichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethytene
Hexane
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene. o-
Xylene, •- and p-
Ethylbenzene
(39)
Sauget. IL
0.15 (2)
1.12 (2)
(0)
O.SO (11)
e 0.05 (4)
3.41 (25)
4.27 (38)
1.64 (29)*
8.45 (39)
1.41 (16)
(37)
Dallas. TX
0.55 (3)
(0)
0.01 (1)
0.07 (4)
0.10 (8)
0.51 (27)
3.92 (33)
0.45 (28)*
2.14 (33)
0.12 (10)
(39)
Midland. MI
0.73 (7)
0.09 (3)
0.05 (4)
0.11 (4)
0.33 (11)
0.93 (25)
2.03 (39)
0.48 (29)*
1.43 (35)
0.16 (14)
(37)
Lansing. KY *2
0.49 (1)
0.01 (1)
(0)
0.05 (2)
0.10 (10)
0.32 (21)
2.79 (33)
0.64 (26)*
3.53 (35)
0.39 (14)
(37)
Louisville. ICY
(0)
0.09 (1)
(0)
0.05 (5)
0.07 (3)
1.07 (25)
7.03 (37)
1.45 (32)*
6.09 (37)
0.81 (17)
(37)
Jacksonville.
FL
(0)
0.04 (1)
(0)
0.11 (4)
0.04 (2)
0.61 (29)
2.25 (29)
1.14 (28)*
3.28 (32)
0.63 (14)
1989 UATMP
DichIoromethane
T r i chIoromethane
Tetrachloronethane
Trichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Hexane
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene, o-
Xylene, •- and p-
EthyIbenzene
(31)
Sauget. IL
0.24 (1)
2.61 (2)
0.19 (31)
0.52 (15)
e 0.30 (17)
2.93 (31)
15.33 (31)
2.43 (31)
6.95 (31)
1.37 (31)
(25)
Dallas. TX
0.13 (1)
0.004(1)
0.16 (25)
0.26 (18)
0.09 (8)
0.92 (25)
1.66 (25)
0.39 (25)
1.20 (25)
0.22 (25)
3-46
-------
TABLE IH-3-73: AMBIENT AIR VOC CONCENTRATIONS REPORTED FOR ATEOS AND TEAM STUDIES
(Pl*v)
Dichloromethane
Trichloromethane
Tetrachloromethane
Trichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Hexane
Benzene
Toluene
Xylene, o-
Xylene, m- and p-
EthyIbenzene
ATEOS.
Sunnier '81
GH*
0.23
0.10
0.01
0.27
0.39
1.05
2.89
0.22
0.75
0.26
Max.
1.67
1.06
0.16
1.82
1.43
4.32
13.60
1.24
4.14
1.41
Elizabeth
Winter
GH
0.87
0.29
0.03
0.46
0.44
3.11
4.09
0.28
1.10
0.32
•82
Hax
21.00
10.10
0.13
4.70
2.80
7.50
18.40
2.20
16.21
2.40
ATEOS.
Sunnier '81
GH
0.35
0.06
0.01
0.50
0.45
1.03
4.65
0.26
0.99
0.33
Max
3.56
0.40
0.21
5.21
3.40
6.53
137.00
1.39
4.98
2.16
Newark
Winter
GH_
0.68
0.21
0.02
0.59
0.42
2.61
4.93
0.44
1.79
0.51
TEAM,
(Mbv
'82
Hax
7.96
36.00
0.19
5.13
2.33
12.70
33.80
1.70
18.00
2.10
Fall
'81
0.28
0.17
0.4
0.87
2.8
..
0.91
2.49
E I i zabeth- Bayonne
calc'd at T=20
Summer
•82
2.62
0.16
1.42
0.90
NC
0.82
2.27
C)**
Winter
•83
0.06
NO
0.073
0.61
NC
0.82
2.13
GH * geometric Mean
NO = not detected in Host samples
NC « not calculated, high background contain nation
3-47
-------
Table III-3-74
SITE CODES
UATMP 1989 Annual Averages
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89 Annual Averages
SITE NAME SITE CODE
Camden, NJ a
Ft. Lauderdale, FL b
Pensacola, FL c
Chicago, IL d
St Louis, MO e
Baton Rouge, LA f
Washington, DC #1 g
Washington, DC #2 h
Wichita, KS #1 i
Wichita, KS #2 j
Miami, FL k
Houston, TX 1
Sauget, IL m
Dallas, TX n
Susan Wagner 1
PS 26 2
Eltingville 3
Great Kills 4
Port Rich 5
Dongan Hills 6
Pump Station 7
Bayley Seton 8
Tottenville 9
Elizabeth 10
Carteret n
Sewaren 12
Piscataway 13
Highland Park 14
3-48
-------
FIGURES III-3-21
THROUGH III-3-30
ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATIONS FOR UATMP (1989)
AND SI/NJ UATAP (1988-89) BY SITE
3-49
-------
Figure III-3-21
DICHLOROMETHANE
UATMP 1989 Annual Averages
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89 Annual Averages
ARITH MEAN (ppb)
5
o
3-e-
j i_
O
O
I 1 L.
n I e g
0 UATMP 1989 Averages (Letters)
* SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Averages (Numbers)
m14j9752
SITE CODE
kd
_ UATMP 1989 Median Value (9 Sites)
--- SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Median Value (6 Sites)
3-50
-------
Figure III-3-22
TRICHLOROMETHANE
UATMP 1989 Annual Averages
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89 Annual Averages
ARITH MEAN (ppb)
3
2.5
1.5
0.5
O
SITE CODE
O UATMP 1989 Averages (Letters)
* SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Averages (Numbers)
UATMP 1989 Median Value (14-Sftes)
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 69
Median Value (13 Sites)
3-51
-------
Figure III-3-23
TETRACHLOROMETHANE
UATMP 1989 Annual Averages
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89 Annual Averages
ARITH MEAN (ppb)
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
rOO
r>r>
ooo
I I I I I I
O CM OD C •*= «B O "•- — — ' TJ — •
SITE CODE
O UATMP 1989 Averages (Letters)
* SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Averages (Numbers)
UATMP 1989 Median Value (14 Sites)
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Median Value (13 Sttea)
3-53
-------
Figure III-3-24
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
UATMP 1989 Annual Averages
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89 Annual Averages
ARITH MEAN (ppb)
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
o
o
o
o
o
o
^00999****
O — • C h. O— C *O
=
SITE CODE
O UATMP 1989 Averages (Letters)
* SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Averages (Numbers)
UATMP 1989 Median Value (14 Sftea)
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Median Value (13 Sites)
3-54
-------
Figure III-3-25
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
UATMP 1989 Annual Averages
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89 Annual Averages
ARITH MEAN (ppb)
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
o
H^e-
.o T- -o T- 04
O
o
QQ*
am oo
SITE CODE
O UATMP 1989 Averages (Letters)
* SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Averages (Numbers)
UATMP 1989 Median Value (13 Sites)
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 88
Median Value (13 Sttea)
3-55
-------
Figure III-3-26
BENZENE
UATMP 1989 Annual Averages
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89 Annual Averages
ARITH MEAN (ppb)
5
o
o
.-*
I I I I I I
I I I I
O
o
O
o
.0
oo'
o
I I I I I
ej—NCMCMIO oieo OJc<*-eot^ « a QD .c — CTJ «
^ ¥- V T^
SITE CODE
O UATMP 1989 Averages (Letters)
* SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Averages (Numbers)
UATMP 1989 Median Value (14 Sites)
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Median Value (13 Sites)
3-57
-------
Figure III-3-27
TOLUENE
UATMP 1989 Annual Averages
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89 Annual Averages
ARITH MEAN (ppb)
18
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
o
o
Ooo
00
1 I I I
eo *-
a CD 10 .* z> .c o TJ e
SITE CODE
O UATMP 1989 Averages (Letters)
* Sl/NU UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Averages (Numbers)
UATMP 1989 Median Value (14 Sites)
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Median Value (13 Sites)
3-58
-------
Figure III-3-28
O-XYLENE
UATMP 1989 Annual Averages
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89 Annual Averages
ARITH MEAN (ppb)
3
2.6
1.5
0.5
•O*'
o
o
o
o
oo
o
(J
SITE CODE
O UATMP 1989 Averages (Letters)
* SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Averages (Numbers)
UATMP 1989 Median Value (14 Sites)
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sep* 88
Median Value (13 Sites)
3-59
-------
Figure III-3-29
M, P-XYLENE
UATMP 1989 Annual Averages
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89 Annual Averages
ARITH MEAN (ppb)
8
6
O
O
O
O
,o
J—I—I—I—I—I—I—I—I—I—I—I—I—I—I—I—I -I I I t I I I I I
CO OCM^-COO — i-
CM h* U> OBCO *- W — H ® .* .O .C OTJ
SITE CODE
O UATMP 1989 Averages (Letters)
* SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Averages (Numbers)
UATMP 1989 Median Value (14 Sites)
- - SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Median Value (13 Sites)
3-60
-------
Figure III-3-30
ETHYLBENZENE
UATMP 1989 Annual Averages
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sepf 89" Annual Averages
ARITH MEAN (ppb)
1.6
1.4
1.2
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
o
0
o
o
o
O
o
•* o
.o.
o
I I I I I I
clnjgfal83kb6h«dm
SITE CODE
O UATMP 1989 Averages (Letters)
* Sl/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Averages (Numbers)
UATMP 1989 Median Value (14 Sites)
SI/NJ UATAP Oct 88-Sept 89
Median Value (3 SKes)
3-61
-------
4. AMBIENT MONITORING
4.1 INTRODUCTION
An integrated sampling program was undertaken to evaluate
the ambient air concentrations of selected volatile organic
compounds (VOCs), particulate trace metals, particulate
benzo[ot]pyrene (B[a]P) , and formaldehyde; and the meteorological
conditions within the Staten Island/New Jersey region. In
addition to the Objectives listed in Volume II, the site
selection and sampling frequency were designed to provide annual
average concentrations for use in risk assessment and for
evaluation of spatial and temporal variations of the ambient
concentrations of the measured chemicals.
At the inception of this project little information was
available about the VOC concentrations in the region, and no
continuous, long-term measurements (of duration greater than one
year) of VOCs had been reported at any urban sites. Singh et al.
(1982) reported sub-part-per-billion levels of chlorinated,
aromatic, and aliphatic hydrocarbons in Staten Island during one
week of sampling. These values were similar to those that they
measured in other urban cities. Lioy et al. (1983a,b) and Harkov
et al. (1983,1984) reported concentrations of numerous VOCs in
several New Jersey cities for the summer of 1981 and the winter
of 1982 based on 30 to 40 samples collected in each season; the
work was done as part of the Airborne Toxic Element and Organic
Substances (ATEOS) project.
The Total Exposure Assessment Methodology (TEAM) program,
undertaken by the EPA, also made ambient and indoor air
measurements of VOCs in parts of New Jersey for limited time
periods (Wallace et al. 1985, Hartwell et al. 1987). A number of
other projects were developed by the US EPA concurrent with the
SI/NJ UATAP to monitor the VOC concentrations in urban regions
over extended time periods; among them were the Toxics Air
Monitoring System (TAMS) network and the Urban Air Toxics
Monitoring Program (UATMP) (U.S. EPA 1990). Neither of these
had either the sampling site density within a single region or
the sample frequency that was incorporated into the SI/NJ UATAP.
The particulate trace metal and B[ot]P sampling, collection,
and analysis were developed as extensions of the criteria
pollutant programs of the two state governmental agencies
involved in the project—NYSDEC and NJDEP. While these data are
not as unique as the VOC data (Schroeder et al. 1987), their
collection in the region, simultaneous with the other activities
of the SI/NJ UATAP, was considered important in the final risk
calculations f°r ambient air contaminants.
4-1
-------
Meteorological information was obtained from stations
established specifically for this project in Staten Island and
from existing 'facilities in New Jersey and the surrounding areas
in New York.
The results discussed in this chapter are the ambient
concentration data for VOCs.
4.2 VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
Ambient air sampling for VOCs was more extensive than for
the other compounds addressed. Little was known about VOCs in
the project area, and VOC concentrations were expected to vary by
site to a greater extent than the other pollutant species
sampled. VOC monitoring was complicated further by the lack of a
standard method, and the use of several laboratories and their
different instrumentations for sampling and analysis.
Tenax sorbent was used as the primary sample collection
medium for all organizations. This choice was made on the basis
of cost, the documentation of its strengths and weaknesses
(Walling et al., 1986), and SI/NJ UATAP members' experience. A
mixture of Tenax, Ambersorb, and charcoal was used by NYSDEC;
this mixture was demonstrated to be equivalent, and in some cases
superior, to Tenax. Evacuated canisters were not used as the
primary sampling method because of the expense and the lack of
sufficient laboratory analytical capacity required by this
sampling approach. Nevertheless, canister samples were used in
the project as a quality assurance tool.1 NJIT collocated
canister and Tenax samplers at its sites because it was able to
analyze and clean its own canisters.
Tenax samples were collected at nominal flows of 8 and 16
cc/min. Flow rates were based upon values reported in the
literature (U.S. EPA, 1982; Butler and Burke, 1976) and the
experience of members in the SI/NJ UATAP. The use of parallel
samples at different flow rates, an arrangement termed
distributed-volume sampling, was used to provide data to assess
breakthrough and precision. Although previous distributed-volume
sampling had been done with a four-tube apparatus (Walling 1984),
this approach was rejected due to fiscal and analytical
limitations. Also, experience early in the project, combined
with extensive QA throughout the project, ensured that the two
parallel tubes would be sufficient for confirming the quarterly
and annual averages for the VOC parameters.
to Section 2 of this volume.
4-2
-------
Quality Assurance (QA) in the project was extensive as
noted. From a monitoring standpoint, the QA covered two levels.
First, each organization was responsible for its own QA and QC,
preparing its own QA plans and proposing its own QA and QC
procedures, including the process for determining what data to
submit. The QA Subcommittee served a QA oversight role,
arranging specific QA activities, reviewing and auditing work in
progress, and reviewing the final data and the accompanying QA
reports.
Comparability between the different laboratories in the
SI/NJ UATAP was determined by the use of an outside commercial
laboratory (PEI Associates) to analyze samples collocated with a
portion of the adsorbent samples gathered by each of the sampling
organizations.
Comparisons of the laboratories were performed as multi-day
experiments where all SI/NJ UATAP participants collocated their
own equipment and gathered consecutive 24-hour composite ambient
air samples. These comparisons, referred to as shootouts, served
the following purposes: (l) to evaluate inter-organizational
differences, (2) to provide a forum for shakedown of the sample
collection systems, and (3) to share ideas among participants.
Shootouts were conducted in 1987 and 1988. A third Shootout
conducted in 1989 used NYSDEC sampling pumps and flow controllers
for all participants, as opposed to each organization's using its
own sampling apparatus. Shootout results are presented in
Section 2 of this volume and in Volume VI.
Laboratory accuracy was verified by the analysis of unknowns
spiked by EPA/AREAL at Research Triangle Park. Contamination was
monitored through the use of blanks. For the first nine months
of the study, blank data were reported and used to correct the
data by all organizations except NJIT. NJIT maintained that a
single measurement from a blank was not an accurate estimate of
the contribution of background contamination to the sample
concentration, since this background level is variable and arises
from thermal degradation of the sorbent and sample handling.
Thus, since blank levels were always below 20% of the sample
concentration, the blank levels were discarded. After the fourth
quarter of 1989, a rolling blank mean was computed from the five
most recent blank values, not including those determined to be
contaminated. This estimate of the blank contribution was then
subtracted from the sample to obtain the reported concentration.
A determination of contamination was made if the concentration of
a particular compound in the blank (a) exceeded the rolling blank
mean by twice the standard deviation of the rolling mean, and (b)
exceeded 50% of the sample concentration for that day. Both
criteria were needed—the first because consistent large
background levels need not cause sample invalidation; and the
second because variable small background levels need not cause
sample invalidation.
4-3
-------
Minimum detection limits (MDLs) for each compound are
reported in Table III-4-1. CSI reported an MDL for each flow
rate; therefore, two MDLs are reported for CSI. Compounds not
detected in a sample or detected below the MDL were reported as
one half the MDL. A sample value was also reported to be at the
MDL if its concentration was one half of the blank value observed
for that day. In the quarterly data reports,
NYSDEC listed the MDL for the low-flow tube as the MDL for the
chemical, but retained values less than the listed MDL in cases
where the concentration in the high-flow tube exceeded the MDL
for the high flow rate. In such cases, the reported
concentration for that day would be a three-tube average based on
actual and half-MDL values. All values were reported unless they
could be ascribed to known problems in sampling and analysis.
4.2.1 Quarterly and Annual Average Data
Tables III-3-1 through 21 list the quarterly and annual
arithmetic average concentrations, by compound, for samples
collected with a solid sorbent. For each VOC, Table III-4-2
gives the number of valid samples collected, and the number of
samples with concentrations above the MDL for the second year of
sampling. Tables III-3-23 through 44 rank sites by decreasing
quarterly average for each quarter of the study.
In the second year of sampling, benzene, toluene,
ethylbenzene, 33- and g-xylene, o-xylene and hexane were
consistently detected at levels >MDL in >98% of the valid
samples. Tetrachloroethene and 1,l,1-trichloroethane were
detected in >85% and >94% of the samples, respectively.
Tetrachloromethane was detected in >96% of the samples for NJIT
and CSI, and in 54 to 77% of the samples for NYSDEC sites.
Dichloromethane was subject to breakthrough with Tenax;
therefore, CSI and NJIT values for dichloromethane were deleted
from the data set for this study. In contrast, canister
collocation studies demonstrated that dichloromethane was
efficiently collected with the mixed adsorbent used by NYSDEC;
>92% of the valid samples were >MDL.
None of the sorbents efficiently collected chloromethane;
submitted data were invalidated.
For the remaining VOCs, see Table III-4-3 below for the
percentage of valid samples found to be greater than the MDL for
each of the laboratories in the second year of sampling. (Note:
This table was derived from Table III-4-2.)
4-4
-------
Table III-4-3: Partial listing of X of samples >MDL in the second year of
sampling
Valid samples with
concentrations >MDL
Chemical NJIT NYSDEC
trichloromethane 33-53 52-91 90-91
trichloroethene 54-68 76-95 92-98
dichloroethane, 1,2- - 15-42 88-93
styrene - - 96-99
tribromomethane - - <1
chlorobenzene - 16-48 22-26
dichlorobenzene, 1,3-dichloroethane, - 66-82 12-19
1,1- - - 3-12
trichloroethane, 1,1,2- - 0-6 <1
dichlorobenzene, 1,2- - 0-22 14-18
dichlorobenzene, 1,4- - 2-20 7-12
4.2.2 Temporal trends in the SI/NJ UATAP data
Seasonal trends were examined for compounds whose quarterly
mean concentrations exceeded the MDL at least 75% of the time.
No statistical tests were done, but various trends were
identified. The aromatic compound data suggest that values
higher than the annual mean occurred during the January-to-March
quarter of each year, and lower values occurred during the April-
to-June quarter for all sites, with few exceptions. No trends
were apparent for the chlorinated compounds. Similarly, little
seasonal variability was observed in New Jersey during the TEAM
study in 1982/1983, although large seasonal variations were
identified in Los Angeles, CA (Hartwell et al. 1987).
4-5
-------
4.2.3 Spatial Trends in the SI/NJ UATAP Data
In this section, the sites are referred to by numbers and
letters as follows:
Susan Wagner 1 Pumping Station 7
Travis (PS-26) 2 Bayley Seton Hospital 8
Eltingville 3 Tottenville 9
Great Kills 4 Elizabeth A
Port Richmond 5 Carteret B
Dongan Hills 6 Sewaren C
Piscataway D
CSI ran sites 3, 6, and 8. NYSDEC ran sites 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, and
9. NJIT ran sites A, B, C, D.
Spatial trends among sites were examined by ranking sites
according to their quarterly and annual mean concentrations, and
studying the resulting relationships. It was suspected that
variability between laboratories was greater than variability
within laboratories; therefore, two approaches to ranking were
taken. The first approach grouped sites of each laboratory
separately (see Figures III-3-7 through 17), and then ranked the
sites within the individual groups. The second approach (Tables
III-3-23 through 44) ranked all sites regardless of laboratory
jurisdiction. The likelihood of statistically significant
results referred to in this section are based upon the quarterly
precision data presented by each laboratory in reports contained
in Volume VI of the project report; comparisons to collocated
canisters presented in Section 2 of this volume and in the Volume
III appendix; and Shootout results presented in Section 2 of this
volume and in Volume VI.
For ethylbenzene, 1,1-dichloroethane, 1,2-dichloroethane,
1,1,2-trichloroethane, tribromomethane, styrene, chlorobenzene,
and o-and p-dichlorobenzene, the project data were insufficient
to establish whether or not trends existed; either the number of
sites or the number of values >MDL were too few.
4.2.3.1 Dichloromethane
Only the NYSDEC sites (sites 1,2,4,5,and 7) were analyzed
for trends in dichloromethane concentrations. The NJDEP and CSI
results for this compound were deleted from the data base. The
range of annual mean concentrations was 0.47 to 0.93 ppb.
Concentrations were highest at sites 2 and 5 and lowest at sites
1 and 4. Significant differences are likely to exist during the
second year of the study between the sites with the highest
concentrations and the sites with the lowest concentration.
Examination of quarterly data showed varying concentration levels
with no clearly discernable patterns, except that in the second
4-6
-------
with no clearly discernable patterns, except that in the second
year, sites 1 and 4 always had readings lower than those at sites
2 and 5.
4.2.3.2 Trichloromethane (chloroform)
Annual average concentrations for trichloromethane in the
first year of data range from 0.03 to 0.09 ppb. The quarterly
and annual chloroform concentrations tended to segregate by
analytical laboratory. Inter-laboratory comparisons are likely
to be misleading. Intra-laboratory comparisons show that in the
first year of the study, differences between any two sites were
0.02 ppb or less, and thus statistically indistinguishable.
Further analysis may show that the differences between NYSDEC's
site 7 and sites 1, 4, 5, and 9 in the second year of the data
are statistically significant. Quarterly data showed the same
trends as the annual data.
4.2.3.3 Tetrachloromethane (carbon tetrachloride)
No site was consistently, significantly higher for
tetrachloromethane in every quarter. Annual mean concentrations
ranged from 0.06 to 0.18 ppb in the first year of the study, and
0.09 to 0.16 ppb in the second year of the study. During three
of the four quarters of the second year, NYSDEC Site 9 was
consistently among the sites with the highest concentrations; and
NYSDEC sites 1 and 5, consistently among those with the lowest
concentrations. Since many values were below the MDL,
differences among sites were hard to detect.
4.2.3.4 1,1,1-Trichloroethane
The annual mean concentrations for 1,1,1- trichloroethane
ranged from 0.32-0.72 ppb. Concentrations for NYSDEC and CSI
sites were generally uniform across all sites. For April 1988
through January 1989, the quarterly averages for the operating
New Jersey sites, including the background site Piscataway, were
higher than for the Staten Island sites. Based on the least-
significant differences (LSDs) in Table III-2-22 of QA section,
significant differences between annual average concentrations of
1,1,1-trichloroethane for any of the sites in the second year of
the study are unlikely. This suggests that, on an annual average
basis, the concentration of this ubiquitous solvent is uniform
throughout the study area.
4-7
-------
4.2.3.5 Tetrachloroethene (tetrachloroethylene,
perchloroethylene)
Site 6, with a first-year annual mean concentration of 0.66
ppb, had the highest concentration of tetrachloroethene
throughout the first year of data, and the second highest
concentration throughout the second year. Site 7, inactive in
the first year of the study, had the highest quarterly average
concentrations of tetrachloroethene, and the highest annual
average—1.09 ppb—in the second year. Concentrations for all
other sites during the second year were typically 0.20 to 0.25
ppb. Intra-laboratory statistical examination indicates that
sites 6 and 7 were significantly different from all other sites
analyzed by their respective laboratories. Sites 6 (Dongan
Hills) and 7 (Pumping Station) are likely to be significantly
different from all other sites on an inter-laboratory basis, as
well. The elevated concentrations of tetrachloroethene at site 6
were a likely consequence of the close proximity of dry cleaning
establishments. Section 6 of this volume, the source
identification analysis, addresses relationships between sources
and observed concentrations.
4.2.3.6 Hexane
Hexane was measured at only seven sites, two of which
provided data for only the last three quarters of the second year
of the study. NYSDEC did not provide data for hexane. Site D
had the lowest mean concentration, 0.50 ppb, for the three
quarters in which samples were collected. Sites A and B, with
quarterly average concentrations ranging from 0.67 to 1.55 ppb,
had the highest mean concentrations for five of the six quarters
for which both sites were sampled. The annual average
concentration for the second year of site D could be considered
significantly different (lower) from an intra-laboratory
perspective; but significant inter-laboratory differences are
unlikely.
4.2.3.7 Benzene
Annual average benzene concentrations ranged from 0.77 to
1.96 ppb. Site 1 was within 15% of the lowest reported mean
concentration for seven of eight quarters. No single site was
consistently the highest, however the mean quarterly
concentrations at sites B (Carteret), A (Elizabeth), 5 (Port
Richmond), and 6 (Dongan Hills), were above the average of all
sites in all but one quarter. On an intra-laboratory basis,
statistically significant differences are likely between the
sites of lowest concentration and the sites of highest
concentration, on both an annual and quarterly mean basis.
Inter-laboratory differences are most likely to account for
4-8
-------
differences observed between CSI sites 3, 6, and 8, and NYSDEC
sites 1, 4, and 9 during the second year of the study.
4.2.3.8 Toluene
Toluene annual average concentrations ranged from 1.93 to
4.25 ppb. Site 1 Susan Wagner, with quarterly average
concentrations of 1.88 to 3.13 ppb, was within 15% of the lowest
reported mean quarterly concentration during seven of the eight
quarters, when the background site (D) is not included. Site D
was significantly lower during two of the three quarters that
samples were collected. No site was always highest. If the LSDs
in QA Table III-2-21 are applicable to quarterly average
comparisons, then the differences between the higher and lower
quarterly mean concentrations at the different sites are likely
to be statistically significant.
4.2.3.9 o-Xylene
Over the two-year period of the study, o-xylene
concentrations ranged from 0.28 to 0.68 ppb. Site 5 (Port
Richmond) had the highest mean concentration, typically 0.5 to
0.6 ppb, during seven of eight quarters. If the LSDs in QA Table
IH-2-20 are applicable to quarterly average comparisons, and if
LSDs for o-xylene in the second year of the study are no greater
than those for the first year (as was the case for toluene and m-
and p.-xylene) , then the differences between the highest and
lowest concentrations are likely to be statistically significant.
4.2.3.10 jn- and jj-Xylenes
The annual mean concentrations of m- and fi-xylene ranged
from 0.52 to 2.48 ppb. site 6 (Dongan Hills) had the first or
second highest quarterly average in five of the six quarters in
which it was sampled, with concentrations usually exceeding 2.0
ppb. Site 1 (Susan Wagner), with a two-year average
concentration of 0.97 ppb, was always below the average of all
sites. Site D had the lowest mean concentration for the three
quarters that it was sampled. If the LSDs in QA Table III-2-19
are applicable to quarterly average comparisons, then differences
between the highest and lowest quarterly concentrations reported
are likely to be statistically significant.
4-9
-------
4.3 COMPARISON TO OTHER STUDIES OF AMBIENT VOC CONCENTRATIONS
VOC mean concentrations were compared to the data in Harkov
et al. (1983, 1984), collected in NJ during 1981 and 1982 as the
ATEOS project; and the 1989 UATMP (U.S. EPA, 1990), which
reported annual mean concentrations at 14 sites across the
country for the period from January 1989 through December 1990.
These sets of data are the primary bases for the discussions of
20 VOCs in this section. Other data sets, limited in scope and
not reporting annual means, were used only when a compound found
in the SI/NJ UATAP was omitted from the two studies cited.
For 11 VOCs, selected summary data for the second year of
the SI/NJ project, the 1989 UATMP, and the ATEOS and TEAM studies
were presented in Tables III-3-71 to III-3-73. The results from
the TAMS network were not available at the time of this report.
The UATMP study sampled VOCs every twelfth day for one year
at 14 sites nationwide.
Although the ATEOS study was conducted only in the summer
and winter, the measurements were made every day in seasons when
maximum excursions were anticipated at the three urban New Jersey
sites. For almost all the volatile organics listed in this
comparison, including benzene, toluene, trichloroethylene, and
tetrachloroethylene, the maximum values recorded in Elizabeth and
in Newark during ATEOS were greater than those measured in SI/NJ.
Although the characteristics of the ATEOS sites were not
identical to those of the SI/NJ sites, the ATEOS study
represented two different types of areas—Newark, heavily
affected by small point and area sources; and Elizabeth, a
commercial and residential area.
The TEAM data were of more limited utility than the UATMP
and ATEOS data for the comparison purposes of this section. It
is difficult to interpret the TEAM data since the sites changed
from day to day; however, the median values for each season were
similar to, or somewhat greater than, the ATEOS values.
4.3.1 Dichloromethane
Annual mean concentrations for dichloromethane varied from
0.47 to 0.93 at the NYSDEC sites. These concentrations are
similar to the range of seasonal averages previously reported by
Harkov et al. for NJ cities—0.23 to 0.72 ppb. The individual
UATMP sites had annual mean concentrations ranging from 0.12 to
4.1 ppb, though the range 0.12 to 0.5 ppb includes all but two
sites. At only three of the 14 UATMP sites was this chemical
found at concentrations >MDL (0.11 ppb) in more than one sample;
4-10
-------
whereas dichloromethane was found at >MDL (0.2 ppb) in >58% of
the samples at each of the six NYSDEC sites. Thus, while the
SI/NJ UATAP annual means are at the higher end of the values
reported for urban air, they are not significantly different from
values reported in previous studies in the region, and are lower
than values reported for Chicago, IL, and Miami, FL.
4.3.2 Trichloromethane
The annual mean concentrations across all sites for
trichloromethane varied between 0.02 to 0.15 ppb, with the
majority of sites having large numbers of values at the MDL.
These values are similar to those previously reported by Harkov
et al. for this region, and to the overall UATMP mean from the
UATMP of 0.2 ppb. The percentage of samples reported to be
greater than the detection limit was 14% for the UATMP, and in
the range of 33-91% for the second year of the SI/NJ UATAP sites.
4.3.3 Tetrachloromethane
The annual mean concentrations of tetrachloromethane across
all sites in the SI/NJ UATAP ranged between 0.09 to 0.18 ppb,
which represents an increase above the mean value of 0.01 ppb
previously reported for NJ by Harkov et al. The SI/NJ data are
similar to the UATMP overall mean of 0.19 ppb, and range of
annual mean concentrations from 0.13 to 0.24 ppb.
4.3.4 i.1—pjchloroethane
The ambient concentrations of 1,1-dichloroethane were at the
MDLs of 0.01 and 0.02 ppb almost throughout the SI/NJ UATAP, in
agreement with the UATMP which only detected it in 3% of the
samples.
4.3.5 1.2-Dichloroethane
The ambient concentration of 1,2-dichloroethane was close to
the MDL in a large percentage of samples in the SI/NJ UATAP, with
reported annual means of 0.02 to 0.04 ppb. It was detected less
frequently in the UATMP, which reported a mean concentration of
0.02 ppb.
4-11
-------
4.3.6 1.1.1-Trichloroethane
The annual mean concentrations across all sites for the
SI/NJ UATAP ranged from 0.32 to 0.72 ppb, with almost universal
detection. This compound was not reported in Harkov et al.
(1983, 1984). Singh et al. (1982) measured a concentration of
0.5 ppb in Staten Island. The mean from UATMP was 1.1 ppb with
measurable quantities in 99.5% of the samples. The range for
individual sites from the UATMP was 0.31 to 5.2 ppb, with the
SI/NJ UATAP sites having annual mean concentrations similar to
the lowest 11 of 14 sites sampled by UATMP.
4.3.7 Trichloroethene (trichloroethylene)
The annual mean concentrations across all sites for the
SI/NJ UATAP ranged from 0.03 to 0.27 ppb with all but one mean
value £0.13 ppb. The means measured previously at three sites in
NJ were 0.21 to 0.50 ppb. The Staten Island concentration
reported by Singh et al. (1982) was 0.16 ppb. The average of all
sites from the UATMP was 0.24 ppb with measurable amounts in 44%
of the samples. The concentration was highly variable among
cities, ranging from <0.1 ppb in six cities, to as high as 0.9
ppb in Miami, FL. The range mean concentrations for the SI/NJ
UATAP sites agreed with the lower range of the annual mean
concentrations measured for the UATMP sites.
4.3.8 1.1.2-Trichloroethane
This compound was detected in 0 to 6% of the samples at
sites in the SI/NJ UATAP study, with MDLs of 0.02 and 0.04 ppb.
This is consistent with the Harkov et al. data that reported 0.01
ppb levels in NJ, and with the UATMP data which found measurable
quantities in <20% of the samples and a mean of 0.07 ppb.
4.3.9 Tetrachloroethene
This compound was detected in >92% of the samples at all
sites in the SI/NJ UATAP. Annual mean concentrations exhibited
the widest concentration range between sites in the project,
varying from 0.13 to 1.1 ppb. This is thought to be the result
of micro-environmental sources influencing the two sites with the
highest reported concentrations. At the other sites in the SI/NJ
UATAP, levels were similar to those reported by Harkov et al. for
NJ, where seasonal average concentration ranged from 0.24 to 0.45
ppb. The mean for the UATMP sites was 0.18 ppb, with detection
4-12
-------
in only 44% of the samples. Variability among the UATMP urban
sites—0.07 to 0.39 ppb—was smaller than that among the SI/NJ
UATAP sites, even though the UATMP samples were drawn from 12
different metropolitan areas and the SI/NJ UATAP samples were
drawn from a single metropolitan area. This reinforces the
likelihood that point sources influenced the observed
concentrations in the SI/NJ UATAP.
4.3.10 Tribromomethane (bromoforml
This compound was detected once (MDL of 0.01 to 0.04 ppb)
during the SI/NJ UATAP, which concurs with the other literature
for ambient, urban air.
4.3.11 Hexane
The annual means for hexane in the SI/NJ UATAP varied from
0.5 to 1.42 ppb. This compound was not quantitated in the UATMP
or the ATEOS studies.
4.3.12 Benzene
The annual mean concentrations for all sites during the
SI/NJ UATAP varied between 0.77 to 1.96 ppb. The average
regional concentrations reported by Harkov et al. for NJ were 1.1
ppb during the summer and 2.8 ppb in the winter. The mean
concentration measured for samples in all cities during the UATMP
was 2.0 ppb, with a range of 0.6 to 4.0 ppb for annual averages
of the individual cities. Thus, benzene concentrations in the
SI/NJ region are typical of urban cities.
4.3.13 Toluene
The annual mean concentrations of toluene for all sites
during the SI/NJ UATAP varied between 1.9 and 4.9 ppb. Harkov et
al. reported summer mean values for NJ between 1.8 and 4.7 ppb,
while winter mean concentrations varied between 3.4 to 4.9 ppb;
it appears that toluene concentrations in the SI/NJ region have
not changed significantly with time. The mean from the UATMP was
4.6 ppb, with annual mean concentrations of individual cities
ranging from 1.2 to 15 ppb.
4-13
-------
4.3.14 o-Xvlene
The annual mean concentrations of o-xylene for all sites
during the SI/NJ UATAP varied between 0.24 and 0.68 ppb. Harkov
et al. reported a summer value of 0.2 ppb for NJ, and winter
values between 0.2 and 0.4 ppb. Because of a lack of separation
in the analytical process, o-xylene and styrene were reported
together in the UATMP data set. Assuming the concentrations
reported were mostly o-xylene, the mean concentration of all
UATMP samples was 1.1 ppb, and the annual mean concentrations of
individual sites ranged between 0.2 and 2.4 ppb. Therefore, the
SI/NJ region currently has o-xylene concentrations similar to
those measured in 1981/1982, and typical of those found in urban
areas.
4.3.15 m- and p-Xvlene
Annual mean concentrations of m-, p.-xylene for all sites
during the SI/NJ UATAP varied between 0.52 and 2.5 ppb. Harkov
et al. reported summer values for NJ ranging between 0.49 and
0.99 ppb; and winter values, between 0.9 and 1.8 ppb. In the
UATMP, the mean concentration reported for all sites was 3.2 ppb,
with the annual mean concentrations of individual cities ranging
between 0.67 and 7.0 ppb. Therefore, the SI/NJ region currently
has m-, E-xylene concentrations similar to those measured in
1981/1982, and typical of those found in urban areas.
4.3.16 Ethylbenzene
The annual mean concentrations of ethylbenzene for all sites
during the SI/NJ UATAP varied between 0.18 and 0.84 ppb. Harkov
et al. reported summer values for NJ ranging from 0.17 to 0.33
ppb; and winter values, from 0.23 and 0.51 ppb. The mean
concentration reported for samples from all UATMP sites was 0.57
ppb, with annual mean concentrations of the individual cities
ranging from 0.12 to 1.4 ppb. This confirms that the SI/NJ
region currently has ethylbenzene concentrations similar to those
measured in 1981/1982, and typical of those found in urban areas.
4.3.17 Stvrene
The annual mean concentrations for the three CSI sites for
styrene varied between 0.08 and 0.11 ppb. Harkov et al. reported
summer values between 0.07 and 0.13 ppb for NJ; and winter
values, between 0.14 and 0.24 ppb. The gas chromatography scheme
4-14
-------
used for the UATMP did not separate o-xylene from styrene; see
item 4.3.15 for o-xylene/styrene results from UATMP.
4.3.18 Chlorobenzene
Chlorobenzene was typically at its MDL of 0.01 and 0.02 ppb
during the SI/NJ UATAP. Harkov et al. reported summer
concentrations in this region from 0.07 to 0.11 ppb; and from
0.18 to 0.22 ppb during the winter. The mean for Chlorobenzene
at all sites of the UATMP was 0.13 ppb, but this was skewed by
the fact that 2 cities, St. Louis, MO, and Sauget, XL, had
concentrations of 0.43 ppb and 0.98 ppb, respectively. For the
other 12 cities in the UATMP, the annual mean concentration was
0.02 ppb; and for the entire study, only 25% of the samples had
concentrations above the detection limit. Thus, the SI/NJ region
currently has concentrations of Chlorobenzene lower than those
measured in 1981/1982, and similar to those in most urban
centers.
4.3.19 o- and m-Dichlorobenzene (1.2- and 1.3- Dichlorobenzenel
These compounds were >MDL for 12 to 19% of the samples at
CSI sites (MDLs of p.01 and 0.02 ppb), and for 0 to 82% of the
samples at NYSDEC sites (MDLs of 0.04 and 0.02 ppb) during the
second year of the SI/NJ UATAP. The concentrations reported for
NJ by Harkov et al. and for the UATMP cities were similar to the
CSI sites with respect to percent >MDL.
4.3.20 p-Dichlorobenzene (1.4- Dichlorobenzene)
p-Dichlorobenzene was less than its MDL of 0.02 to 0.04 ppb
for ^80% of the samples during the second year of the SI/NJ
UATAP. Similar values were reported previously for this region
by Harkov et al. In contrast, a mean concentration of 0.32 ppb
was determined by the UATMP. The individual UATMP sites varied
from 0.05 to 1.3 ppb, and 10 of the 14 sites had concentrations
below 0.2 ppb. The concentration of this compound appears to be
lower in the SI/NJ region than in other urban centers.
4.4 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS FOR THE SI/NJ UATAP
In general, the VOC concentrations found in this region are
similar to those of other urban areas of the country. The data
4-15
-------
show general patterns of intersite relationships and temporal
variations which are similar to those expected by a knowledgeable
air pollution research scientist. However, some of the data for
given times or places require further examination to explain
variations of interest.
Toluene, the xylenes, and benzene—VOC components of
petroleum refineries, gas stations, and automobile emissions—
were among the major pollutants found. The common industrial
solvents dichloromethane, 1,1,1- trichloroethane, and
tetrachloroethene, were also identified in the project area at
levels above background. Dichloromethane showed widely varying
daily values; the reasons for the variation are not known. The
variations are quite different from the relatively uniform
pattern of concentrations observed for 1,1,1-trichloroethane.
Trichlororaethane, trichloroethene, and tetrachloromethane
concentrations were observed at low concentrations, most likely
the result of background levels present in the atmosphere.
The distribution of pollutant species across the region was
relatively uniform, with concentrations of pollutants generally
varying between sites by less than 1 ppb. Nevertheless, several
important observations can be made by segregating the sites
according to laboratory and ranking them by their annual mean
concentrations.
1. Site rankings from the first year of the project were
consistent with those from the second year of the study,
almost without exception. Thus, the pollutant concentration
trends seen among a laboratory's various sites are likely to
be real, and not sampling artifacts.
2. Within laboratories, the site rankings for benzene, toluene,
m- and g-xylene, and o-xylene were identical, except for a
few reversals between two adjacently-ranked sites, when the
concentration differences between these sites was < 0.1 ppb.
This apparent correlation for these pollutants was expected,
since these compounds are components of several sources
which may be significant factors in VOC pollution in the
project area.
3. Among all sites in the project, site 1 (Susan Wagner) and
site D (Piscataway, the background site) had the lowest or
near-lowest pollutant concentrations for almost all
compounds. Although site D typically had lower
concentrations than site 1, it is difficult to determine
whether these differences are significant. For the CSI
sites—Bayley Seton, Dongan Hills, and Eltingville (sites 3,
6, and 8)—the concentrations reported were greater than
those for sites 1 or D by a margin likely to be significant.
The low concentrations observed at site D were expected
because of its upwind location from the more densely
4-16
-------
populated project area. This, in fact, was the reason for
choosing Piscataway as the background site for the project.
The low concentrations at site 1 may be due to site
location; this site was located at one of the highest
geographical points on Staten Island, and sampled at a
height of 18.8 meters above ground—higher than the typical
7- to 10-meter height that was used at other sites in the
project.
4. 1/1,1-trichloroethane was found to be uniformly distributed
throughout the project area. It showed remarkable quarter-
to-quarter consistency in its mean concentration relative to
the other VOC compounds, with the exception of those
compounds at or near the detection limit.
5. For some compounds, point sources may play an important role
in explaining the site-to-site variability observed; see the
following examples:
a. Tetrachloroethene concentrations were dramatically
higher at sites 6 and 7 (Dongan Hills and the Pumping
Station) than at all other sites in the project area.
These elevated concentrations were consistent on a
quarterly basis as well. Site 6 appears to have been
affected by dry cleaning establishments close to the
monitoring site. The site 7 results are unexplained,
but may be affected by emissions from the sewage pumping
station.
b. Trichlorethylene and trichloromethane (chloroform)
concentrations were almost two times higher at site 7
(Pumping station) than at other NYSDEC sites (sites
1,2,4,5, and 9), where pollutant concentrations were
close to their detection limits. No point source has
been identified in relation to this observation; but
publicly-owned treatment works (POTWs) are known to be
major point sources of chlorinated VOCs. This may
indicate likely pumping station emissions.
4.5 CONCLUSIONS
The objective of the ambient air portion of the SI/NJ UATAP
was to characterize the air quality in the project area for
selected parameters for the purpose of providing data for an
exposure assessment. This task was carried out by a diverse group
consisting of federal, state, and university personnel, with each
contingent using its own equipment, techniques, methods, and
philosophies. The challenges inherent in such an approach were met
through successful coordination of effort by the extraordinary
4-17
-------
cooperation of each of these agencies as well as extensive quality
assurance, which allowed meaningful data to be collected.
The results of the ambient air portion, first and foremost,
produced an ambient air profile for the project area. Although
the distribution of measured pollutants was generally uniform in
the project area, significant differences may exist within this
overall appearance of homogeneity that indicate the importance of
geography and point sources. Concern that pollutant
concentrations in the project area were greater than the range
observed for other urban cities was not supported by the data.
Furthermore, comparison to the Harkov data indicates that
currently the SI/NJ area is less polluted than it was in the early
1980s.
An important product of this project was the development of
expertise in air toxics monitoring. As a result, air monitoring
groups in the region have the knowledge of, and experience with,
the strengths and limitations of air toxics methods and the
quality assurance needs required to conduct their mission.
The intercomparisons of the results from the SI/NJ UATAP,
1989 UATMP, ATEOS, and TEAM studies indicate that the SI/NJ area
is not remarkably different from other urban areas in the United
States. In fact taking benzene and toluene as indicator
chemicals, the levels of the volatile organics for the sites in
the SI/NJ UATAP are similar to those found in Washington, DC, or
Detroit, MI. Further, there were no VOCs with unusually high
values in SI/NJ; whereas concentrations for some of the UATMP
locations were widely divergent, as in the case of the very high
toluene concentrations at Sauget, IL.
4.6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This section was prepared by Dr. Clifford Weisel of the
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ), Robert
Wood Johnson Medical School.
4.8 REFERENCES
Butler, L.D.; Burke, M.F. (1976) Chromatographic characterization
of porous polymers for use as adsorbents in sampling columns. J.
Chromatographic Science 14: 117-122.
Faoro, R.B.; Manning, J.A. (1981) Trends in benzo(a)pyrene, 1966-
1977. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 31: 62-64.
4-18
-------
Harkov, R.; Kebbekus, B.; Bozzelli, J.W.; Lioy, P.J. (1983)
Measurement of selected volatile organic compounds at three
locations in New Jersey during the summer season. J. Air Pollut.
Control Assoc. 33: 1177-1183.
Harkov, R.; Kebbekus, B.; Bozzelli, J.W.; Lioy, P.J.; Daisey, J.
(1984) Comparison of selected volatile organic compounds during
the summer and winter at urban sites in New Jersey. The Science of
the Total Environment Journal 38: 259-274.
Hartwell, T.D., Pellizzari, E.D.; Perritt, R.L.; Whitmore, R.W.;
Zelon, H.S.; Wallace, L. (1987) Comparison of volatile organic
levels between sites and seasons for the total exposure assessment
methodology (TEAM) study. Atmosph. Environ. 21: 2413-2424.
Kneip, T.J., Eisenbud, M.; Strehlow, C.D.; Freudenthal, P.C.
(1970) Airborne particulate in New York City. J. Air Pollut.
Control Assoc. 20(3): 144-149.
Lioy, P.J.; Daisey, J.M. (1983a) The New Jersey project on
airborne toxic elements and organic substances (ATEOS): a summary
of the 1981 summer and 1982 winter studies. J. Air Pollut. Control
Assoc. 33(7): 649-657.
Lioy, P.J.; Daisey, J.M.; Reiss, N.M.; Harkov, R. (1983b)
Characterization of inhalable particulate matter, volatile organic
compounds and other chemical species measured in urban areas in
New Jersey-I. summertime episodes. Atmopsher. Environ. 17: 2321-
2330.
Paciga, J.J.; Jervis, R.E. (1976) Multi element size
characterization of urban aerosols. Environ. Sci. & Tech. 10(12):
1124-1128.
Schroeder, W.H.; Dobson, M.; Kane, D.M.; Johnson, N.D. (1987)
Toxic trace elements associated with airborne particulate matter:
a review. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 37: 1267-1280.
Singh, H.B.; Salas, L.J.; Stiles, R.E. (1982) Distribution of
selected gaseous organic mutagens and suspect carcinogens in
ambient air. Environ. Sci. & Tech. 16: 872-880.
Holdren, M.W.; Smith, D.L.; Smith, R.N. (1986) Comparison of
ambient air sampling techniques for volatile organic compounds.
Cincinnati, OH: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of
Research and Development; EPA report no. EPA/600/S4-85/067.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1990) 1989 Urban Air Toxics
Monitoring Program, draft final report. Research Triangle Park,
NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; EPA report no.
68D80014.
4-19
-------
Wallace, L.; Pellizzari, E.D.; Hartwell, T.D.; Sparacino, C.M.;
Sheldon, L.S.; Zelon, H. (1985) Personal exposure, indoor-outdoor
relationships, and breath levels of toxic air pollutants measured
for 355 persons in New Jersey. Atmosph. Environ. 19: 1651-1661.
Walling, J.F. (1984) The utility of distributed air volume sets
when sampling ambient air using solid adsorbents. Atmosph.
Environ. 18: 855-859.
Walling, J.F.; Bumgarner, J.E.; Driscoll, D.J.; Morris, C.M. ;
Riley, A.E.; Wright, L.H. (1986) Apparent reaction products
desorbed from Tenax used to sample ambient air. Atmosph. Environ.
20: 51-57.
4-20
-------
yable III-4-1; Minimum detection limits for second year of SI/NJ UATAP VOCs
data (Oct. 1988 - Sept. 1989)
Minimum detection limits, ppb
Chemical MJIT MYSDEC £S1
chloromethane
dfcliloromethane — 0,04 —
trichloromethane 0.01 0.04 0.02, 0.01
tetracMoromethane 0.05, 0.1, 0.01* 0.06 0.04, 0.02
dichloroethane, 1,1- -•• •-- 0.02, 0.01
dichloro«thane 1,2- --- 0.04 0.02, 0.01
trichloroethene 0.01 0.02 0.02, 0.01
trichloroethane, 1,1,1- 0.01 0.06 0.04, 0.02
trichloroethane, 1,1,2- •-- 0.04 0.04, 0.02
tetrachloroethene 0.01 0.04 0.05, 0.03
tribromomethane --- ... 0.02, 0.01;
& 0.04, 0.02
hexane 0.01 --- 0.1, 0.05
benzene 0.01 0.20 0.13, 0.06
toluene 0.01 0.1 0.4, 0.2
xylene, o- 0.01 0.04 0.2, 0.1
xylene, m- and p- 0.01 0.04 0.4, 0.2
styren* --- ... 0.03, 0.015
ethylbenzene --- 0.04 0.2, 0.1
chlorobenzene --• 0.02 0.02, 0.1
dichlorobenzene, 1,2- ••• 0.04, then 0.02 0.02, 0.01
dichlorobenzene, 1,3- •-- 0.02 0.02, 0.01
dichlorobenzene, 1,4- --- 0.02 0.4, 0.2
* The monthly (daily) and quarterly data reports and final QA reports contain different values for the HOL--0.1 0.01 and
0.05 ppb, respectively.
4-21
-------
Table HI-4-2; Ratio of number of samples greater than the HDL to number of valid samples for VOCs in the second year of the Sl/NJ UATAP (Oct.1988 - Sept.1989)
Chemical NJIT NYSOEC CSI
Cart
Eliz
Sew
Pi scat
19/53
53/53
36/53
53/53
19/57
57/57
31/57
57/57
19/36
37/37
24/37
37/37
49/53 57/57 36/37
53/54 56/56 42/42
chloromethane
dtchloromethane
trichloromethane
tetrachloromethane
dichloroethane, 1,1-
dichloroethane, 1,2-
trichloroethene
trichloroethane, 1,1,1-
trichloroethane, 1,1,2-
• tetrachloroethene
tribromomethane
hexane
benzene
toluene
xylene, o-
xylene, m- and g-
styrene
ethylbenzene
chtorobenzene
dichlorobenzene, 1.2-
dichlorobenzene, 1,3-
dichlorobenzene, 1,4-
footnotes;
This information was gathered from the quarterly QA reports prepared by NYSOEC, CSI, and NJIT.
NYSOEC
53/53
53/53
53/53
53/53
57/57
53/53
53/53
53/53
36/36
53/53
53/53
53/53
19/42
42/42
24/42
42/42
42/42
42/42
42/42
53/53
53/53
53/53
SusUag
36/50
26/50
34/50
15/38
27/35
49/50
0/50
40/50
50/50
50/50
50/50
49/50
50/50
4/50
5/50
26/50
1/50
PS -26
49/54
33/54
34/54
13/31
32/39
52/54
3/54
50/54
54/54
54/54
54/54
54/54
53/54
13/54
12/54
29/54
4/54
PrtRich
58/67
46/67
36/67
12/55
39/52
65/67
3/67
62/67
67/67
67/67
64/64
67/67
67/67
7/67
4/67
39/67
12/67
Pump
44/55
50/55
37/55
9/42
38/40
53/55
0/55
55/55
54/55
55/55
51/52
55/55
55/55
9/55
5/55
33/55
11/55
GtKills
31/53
33/53
34/53
6/41
29/38
51/53
0/53
45/53
53/53
43/43
50/50
53/53
53/53
4/53
4/53
31/53
8/53
Tott
41/52
34/52
40/52
6/39
28/37
49/52
0/52
46/52
52/52
52/52
49/49
52/52
52/52
2/51
0/52
32/52
5/52
B- Set on
179/197
193/197
6/197
183/197
188/197
195/195
1/197
196/196
1/196
197/197
196/196
193/193
194/194
176/176
187/194
195/195
50/196
29/194
37/194
20/194
Eltvl
159/177
176/177
21/177
155/177
163/177
176/176
-1/177
170/176
0/176
173/173
171/171
176/176
173/174
155/155
167/174
172/174
39/175
32/174
20/173
20/173
Dongan
165/182
177/183
5/182
161/181
178/182
179/179
0/182
182/182
0/181
180/180
177/177
182/182
178/179
162/162
177/178
180/180
39/181
25/179
22/179
12/179
CSI
NJIT
trichloroethene: Apr and Jul '89 were problem and invalid samples, respectively.
dichloroethane, 1,2-: Apr. '89 is missing.
dichlorobenzene, 1,2-: Detection limit was lower for the ATD-50 tubes (0.02 ppb) than for the Envirochem tubes CO.04 ppb).
m- and g-xylene: Apr '89 is missing.
For all compounds, most of samples were taken in Oct '88 and Jan '89 quarters. No more than 8 samples were from Apr '89; no more than 20 were from
Jul '89.
tribromomethane: Detection limits as 0.02 and 0.01 ppb for Oct '88 and Apr '89 quarters; 0.04 and 0.02 ppb for Jan '89 and Jul '89 quarters.
1,1,2-trichloroethane: In Apr '89 quarterly report, * > mdl is -1; and 0.017, a value < the mdl, is the max.
tetrachloromethane: Monthly, quarterly, and final QA reports contain different values for the mdl--0.1, 0.01, and 0.05 ppb, respectively.
Where no samples are > mdl on quarterly report, quarterly avg. was the mdl, not half the mdl; e.g.. see dichloromethane, trichloromethane.
4-22
-------
5. EMISSION INVENTORY
5.1 INTRODUCTION
The development of a volatile organic compounds/air toxics
emission inventory for the SI/NJ UATAP area was considered
essential for understanding the urban air toxics problem in the
area and facilitating evaluation of general abatement strategies
for toxic air pollutants. The inventory included only those
discharges, whether direct or indirect, emitted into the ambient
atmosphere from specific source categories. Sources were
categorized as point, area and mobile sources. Among the types
of sources not included are aircraft operations and marine and
rail activities. Sections 5.1.1 through 5.1.3 provide a full
description of the scope of the source types or categories
included in the project emissions inventory.
The bounds of the study area for area and mobile sources
were Middlesex (88% of the population) and Union Counties in New
Jersey, and Staten Island (Richmond County) in New York. For the
point source portion of the inventory, sources in Monmouth,
Essex, and Hudson Counties in New Jersey, and in Brooklyn (Kings
County) in New York were considered, as well.
5.1.1 Point Sources
The point source category covers any facility located in the
defined study area (see Figure III-5-1) and included in the
following:
(1) the 1988 Toxic Chemical Release Inventory (TRI);
(2) the NJDEP Air Pollution Enforcement Data System (APEDS);
(3) the NYSDEO Source Management System (SMS):
(4) the New York City Department of Environmental Protection
(NYCDEP), Bureau of Air Resources Air Management
Information System (BARAMIS);
(5) the EPA Region II/Air Programs Branch POTW Emission
Inventory; and/or
(6) certain area source categories originally evaluated under
the area source inventory and selected for inclusion as
point sources because of the strength of their emissions.
These were landfills; hazardous waste treatment, storage,
and disposal facilities (TSDFs); publicly-owned treatment
works (POTWs); hospital sterilizers; and industrial dry
cleaners.
5-1
-------
Except for the types of sources noted in Section 5.1.2 Area
Sources, sources were included if they emitted, or had a
potential to emit, the air toxics listed in Table III-5-1.
Generally, point sources cover emissions which are released
into the atmosphere from a combination of stacks, exhaust vents,
ducts, pipes, or other confined air streams, and storage tanks.
These emissions were aggregated into a facility-wide total for
the purposes of this project. For the 1988 TRI data, the
facility-wide total also included fugitive emissions which are
emissions not released through readily-identifiable, confined air
streams. Fugitives include emissions, evaporation, leakage, or
releases from the following sources: blending operations;
transfer operations; charging and discharging of reaction
vessels; storage piles; leaking seals, pumps, flanges, valves,
etc.; furnaces or kilns; open vats or pits; crushing, palletizing
or grinding operations; and, loading and unloading operations.
5.1.2 Area Sources
The term area source applies to stationary sources which are
usually too small and/or too numerous to be included singly under
the definition of point source. For this project, only the
following activities were included under the definition of area
source:
• architectural coating
• area (residential) oil heating
• area (residential) wood burning
• auto refinishing [specifically, operations under the
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) 7532
(Prentice Hall, 1988)]
• cold degreasing
• consumer solvent use
• dry cleaning (SIC 7215 - coin operated)
(SIC 7216 - commercial)
• gasoline distribution, retail (SIC 5541)
(i.e. gas tank filling)
5.1.3 Mobile Sources
The term mobile source applies to motor vehicles which
routinely use the roadways, including motorcycles, light-duty
gasoline-fueled cars and trucks, light-duty diesel-fueled cars
and trucks, medium-duty gasoline and diesel-fueled trucks, heavy-
duty gasoline and diesel-fueled trucks, and gasoline and diesel-
fueled buses.
5-2
-------
5.1.4 Unified Data Base
In the early stages of the project, it was recognized that
there would be difficulty in establishing a common denominator
for the emission inventory. Therefore the concept of a unified
data base was adopted. The primary goal of the unified data base
was to simplify very complex sets of data into a common format
specifically directed toward tabular summaries and graphic
presentations of the air toxics emissions data. There are both
advantages and limitations to assembling the data in such a
manner. In doing so, the specific differences of the original
data bases may be lost and the summarizations may be
oversimplified. This could lead to incorrect interpretations of
the data. To avert this situation, the following report, and
specifically Section 5.7 Limitations in the Inventory provides
detailed information on the origin of the data and attempts to
place this emission inventory in its proper perspective.
5.1.4.1 Point source data base
Both New Jersey and New York regulate air toxics emitted
from point sources but take somewhat different approaches with
respect to reporting criteria and the types of information to be
reported. The use of the 1988 TRI data interjects a third set of
reporting criteria and information into the emission inventory
data base. The EPA Region II POTW inventory provides a fourth
approach to point source emissions assessment. And, finally, the
assessment of potential emissions from area sources treated as
point sources provides additional point source emissions
assessment methods. Therefore, the point source data were
assembled into a unified data base in a LOTUS 1-2-3 format which
included the following information for each substance:
facility name
street address (physical location)
• municipality
• zip code
Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates
- northing
- easting
facility-wide emissions data
5.1.4.2 Area and mobile source data base
The area and mobile source activities data were assembled in
LOTUS 1-2-3, as well. The source activities were evaluated on a
regional basis, as opposed to a point location basis, and the
emissions source strength for each activity was entered into a
network of grid cells. Refer to Section 5.2 Methodologies for a
detailed discussion of this approach.
5-3
-------
5.1.5 Tabular and Graphic Presentation
The original scope of the Emission Inventory Subcommittee
workplan included the consideration of more than 40 unique
chemicals and chemical compound categories. (Refer to the
project workplan in Volume VI.) Due to significant resource
constraints, the inventory was scaled down to cover the 14 unique
chemicals and one chemical category (cadmium) listed in Table
III-5-1. Of the substances on this short list, five were chosen
for graphical presentation of the data. For each of the five
substances, emission density maps were generated to show the
combined source strengths for the area and mobile source
activities; and bubble maps, to show the individual source
strengths for the point sources. Refer to Section 5.5 for a
description of the mapping techniques. The five substances
mapped were benzene, cadmium and compounds, dichloromethane,
formaldehyde, and perchloroethylene.
5.2 SUBSTANCE LIST
As stated previously, the list of toxic substances
considered for the emission inventory included more than 40
chemicals and chemical compound categories. Substances were
added to the original list based upon consideration of (1)
toxicity factors; (2) significant quantities of potential
emissions (as identified through the state point source
inventories); (3) identification through analysis of the air
monitoring samples; and (4) recommendations of other
subcommittees. This effort resulted in the two lists found in
the Emission Inventory Subcommittee workplan included in Volume
VI.
With the realization that resources were not available to
prepare the planned comprehensive inventory, emissions
information for certain substances were omitted for the following
reasons: (1) their relatively low toxicities (specifically
barium, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, molybdenum, vanadium,
and zinc); (2) the likelihood that they would not be detectable
using the ambient sampling techniques adopted by the project
(e.g., for bromoform, E~dichlorobenzene, and 1,1,2-
trichloroethane); and, in reference to metals and compounds
containing them, (3) the possibility that data base searches for
the many compounds that might contain a given metal would yield
no sources in the project area.
The final list of 15 substances included in the inventory is
found in Table III-5-1. These substances were selected for the
following reasons: (1) relatively high quarterly average ambient
5-4
-------
air concentrations observed in this project; and (2) relatively
high unit risk rankings (i.e. quantity of emissions x toxicity
factor) in other studies (U.S. EPA, 1985; and U.S. EPA, 1989).
5.3 METHODOLOGIES
A wide variety of methodologies was applied to generate not
only the source activities emission inventories, but also the
tabular and graphical presentations of the data.
A review of the available information showed that the
existing state inventories were restricted to point sources.
Developing a comprehensive inventory of air toxics emissions
depended in part on contributions to specific pollutant
inventories from non-industrial, non-point sources, because these
types of sources may contribute significantly to overall air
toxics exposures. In a 1985 report, the U.S. EPA (EPA) first
emphasized the potential contributions of area sources and mobile
sources to air pollution (U.S. EPA, 1985). Therefore, the
development of a comprehensive inventory necessitated the
generation of information previously unknown or unavailable to
the project participants.
For this project, the NJDEP entered into a contract with the
consulting firm of Engineering-Science of Fairfax, Virginia, to
provide a screening-level air toxics emissions inventory for
specific area sources and for mobile sources in Middlesex and
Union Counties. One result of the contract was the New Jersey
Area Source Emissions System (ASES) (NJDEP, 1989). NJDEP shared
the area source emissions estimation procedures with NYSDEC and
EPA Region II, which then produced estimates for sources within
the New York portion of the project area.
5.3.1 Point Source Inventories
At the outset of this project (Fall 1986), the foundation of
the emission inventory was the existing point source data bases
of NJDEP and NYSDEC. Similarities and differences between the
data bases were evaluated in a search for commonalities between
the two. Later, another source of information became available
in the form of the Toxic Chemical Release Inventory (TRI).
Available expertise allowed development of an inventory for
publicly-owned treatment works (POTWs), considered a significant
source of potential air toxics emissions. Sections 5.3.1.1
through 5.3.1.5 discuss in detail the emissions assessment
methodologies for point sources.
5-5
-------
The TRI was used as a primary source of air emissions data
for point sources. The state permit inventory data bases were
used to supplement the point source inventory for those
facilities not included in the TRI, as well as to identify the
permit-allowable emission rates for TRI-covered facilities. The
POTW inventory, the landfill inventory, and the inventory of
treatment, storage, and disposal facilities (TSDFs) for hazardous
wastes provided additional information.
The geographical locations of the sources were identified to
confirm their presence within the project boundaries. This was
accomplished either by UTM coordinates (derived from APEDS or
SMS) or, in the case of TRI facilities, by latitude/longitude
coordinates converted to UTMs. These data fields were an
integral component of the emissions mapping effort.
The point source inventory data are presented in Tables III-
5-2 through III-5-16 in the appendix of this volume. In the
summary of the point source data, the data for isomers of xylene
(i.e., m-xylene, o-xylene, and js-xylene) were aggregated with
"xylene mixed isomers" for consistency in presentation with the
area and mobile source data.
5.3.1.1 1988 Toxic Chemical Release Inventory
The Toxic Chemical Release Inventory (TRI) was established
pursuant to the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (SARA) (P.L. 99-499), Title III, Section 313. Section 313
requires certain manufacturing facilities within Standard
Industrial Classification (SIC) codes 20 through 39 to complete
Toxic Chemical Release Inventory reporting Forms (Form R) if
certain manufacturing, processing, or use thresholds are met.
The 1988 reporting year TRI data base was chosen as the major
source of air emissions data for point sources since it coincided
with a full calendar year of monitoring data collection. Also,
the TRI is considered to be an inventory of actual emissions
because the information was provided by the facilities based upon
actual operating hours, and either documented emissions estimates
or actual emissions.
The SARA reporting thresholds for reporting year 1988 were
50,000 pounds for "manufacturing" and "processing", and 10,000
pounds for "otherwise use." EPA Region II staff generated
computer reports for the 15 substances in Table III-5-1 for
facilities both in New Jersey and New York. The data are
contained within the national Toxic Release Inventory System
maintained by EPA at Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Facilities within the project area were identified by their
municipality location. Where available, the latitude/longitude
coordinates were converted to UTMs, and this information was
entered into the unified data base. When they were not
5-6
-------
available, United States Geological Survey maps were used to
identify, as accurately as possible, the UTM coordinates for the
facility.
The 1988 Form R data include both stack air and fugitive air
emissions on a facility-wide basis. These emissions were
aggregated and converted from pounds per year to tons per year
for use in the point source inventory.
5.3.1.2 Air Pollution Enforcement Data System (APEDS)
APEDS is the New Jersey data management computer system
containing stationary source air pollution emission data and
related enforcement and permitting data. Substance-specific
reports, generated in December 1989 and January and March 1990,
provided permit-allowable emissions data which were used to
supplement the 1988 TRI data base.
NJDEP staff reviewed substance-specific reports and
identified all facilities within the project area. Appropriate
and available information was entered from the substance-specific
reports into the unified data base. The APEDS facility listing
also provided UTM coordinates and zip codes.
APEDS substance-specific reports provided emissions
information for equipment at the source level. "Source
operation" means any process or any identifiable part thereof
having the potential to emit any air contaminant either directly
or indirectly into the outdoor atmosphere. Governing regulations
are found in New Jersey Administrative Code Title 7, Chapter 27,
Subchapter 8, Permits, and Certificates, Hearings, and
Confidentiality. The maximum allowable emission rate in tons per
year for each source was calculated using APEDS information on
emissions rates (Ibs/year) and hours of operation (hours/year).
The allowable rates for all sources (by substance) at the
facility were aggregated for use in the point source inventory.
Note that the hours of operation in APEDS are generally the
maximum potential hours of operation for the permitted source;
therefore, the APEDS emissions are not actual emissions.
5.3.1.3 Source Management System (SMS)/BARAMIS
SMS is the New York State computerized permitting and
enforcement system comparable to APEDS. NYSDEC staff reviewed
substance-specific reports and identified all facilities within
the project area. Appropriate and available information was
entered from the substance-specific reports into the unified data
base.
5-7
-------
The SMS facility listing also provided UTM coordinates and
zip codes. SMS substance-specific reports provided emissions
information for equipment at the source level. Governing
regulations in New York are found in Chapter 6 of the state
Compilation of Codes, Rules and Regulations. For New York State
sources, the maximum allowable emission rate information is
listed on the application form and entered into SMS.
The NYCDEP BARAMIS is a subset of the state SMS. Permit
applications for industrial processes, and combustion and
incineration sources are reviewed directly by NYCDEP; then the
emissions data are entered into BARAMIS and provided to NYSDEC.
5.3.1.4 EPA Region II POTW inventory
This POTW inventory, prepared by EPA Region II, includes
facilities in New Jersey and New York. The basis for the POTW
inventory was a paper by Baamonde and Martinovich (1987) which
devised a methodology for estimating speciated VOC emissions from
sewage treatment plants. The requirements for making the
calculations in the paper were speciated influent data for each
POTW, flow rates, removal efficiencies for each pollutant, and
published tables (U.S. EPA, 1986) which show expected rates of
volatilization for each pollutant. The data provided by these
calculations were acknowledged by the authors as providing order-
of-magnitude estimates only. In the aforementioned paper, the
authors sought to address only total photochemically-reactive VOC
emissions.
For the project POTW inventory, New York City POTW emissions
were taken directly from the data developed for the paper by
Baamonde et al. Total emissions for New Jersey POTWs were
provided by NJDEP in a May 18, 1990, report that was part of its
State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal. In many cases the New
Jersey data were significantly different from those developed
earlier by Baamonde et al. for the same facilities; in order to
maintain consistency between data bases, the New Jersey SIP
figures for total VOCs were used.
While the New Jersey SIP data did not include speciated
emissions, they did include total VOC emissions for more POTWs
than available from Baamonde et al. The following methodology
was devised to speciate total VOC emissions based upon the
results of Baamonde and Martinovich:
Step 1- Where the total VOCs based on New Jersey SIP data and
on the Baamonde et al. data did not agree, the
speciated Baamonde et al. data were prorated so that
the total VOC level matched the New Jersey SIP level.
5-8
-------
Step 2- The speciated Baamonde et al. data were summed for each
pollutant and divided by the total VOC emissions to
develop a profile of an average POTW (i.e., of the
total VOC emissions, "x" percent as toluene, "y"
percent as benzene, etc.).
Step 3- The additional New Jersey POTWs included in the New
Jersey SIP submittal were speciated according to the
average POTW profile from Step 2, based upon the total
VOC emissions of the POTW.
The results are presented in Appendix A, Table III-5-A-1.
5.3.1.5 Area sources treated as point sources
Five source categories, all of which are non-traditional
sources with respect to air permitting activities, were
originally evaluated under the area source assessment procedures.
Based upon the physical size of the facilities and the manageable
number of facilities within the project area, it was determined
that these activities should be included in the point source
inventory instead of the area source inventory. Potential
emissions for the following activities were evaluated for
inclusion within the point source data base:
• landfills
• hazardous waste treatment, storage, and disposal
facilities (TSDFs)
• publicly-owned treatment works (POTWs)
• hospital sterilizers
• industrial dry cleaners (SIC 7218)
Air emissions from such activities are substantially
fugitive in nature. Therefore, air toxics emission inventories
generally do not exist for these source categories. The emission
inventory for the activities within New Jersey was developed by
Engineering-Science; the data are managed by ASES. Of the five
categories listed above, two (dry cleaners and hospital
sterilizers) were covered in the NYSDEC SMS. The NJDEP APEDS
covered four of the categories (landfills, TSDFs, hospital
sterilizers, and industrial dry cleaners), although probably did
not include all such sources at the time. The air toxics
emissions data for these non-traditional categories are included
in the substance-specific summary tables, Tables III-5-4 through
III-5-18 in the appendix of this volume.
»• Landfills emission inventory. Site-specific information
on landfills was obtained from the NJDEP, Division of Solid Waste
Management, Landfill Engineering (NJDEP, 1987); the NYSDEC Region
2 Air Program; and the New York City Department of Sanitation
(Gleason, 1992). Facility name, location, acreage, and depth
5-9
-------
information was supplemented with regression, or averaged, data
when modeling parameters were unavailable. See Emission
Inventory Appendix B, Table III-5-B-1 in the appendix of this
volume for a complete listing of the facilities evaluated in this
inventory and a description of how emission rates were
calculated.
* Hazardous Waste Treatment, Storage and Disposal Facilities
(TSDFs) emission inventory. Hazardous waste TSDFs are non-
traditional sources; little air toxics emission information
existed for this category. The data available concerning amounts
of materials handled and handling activities did not detail how
much was handled in what way. Only those facilities which were
clearly engaged in the processing and treatment of hazardous
wastes were included in this inventory. Emission rates were
estimated using emission factors derived from EPA documentation
(U.S. EPA, 1985a; U.S. EPA, 1985b). (There were no sources in
the New York State region of this study.) See Table III-5-C-1 in
the appendix of this volume for a listing of the facilities
evaluated in this inventory.
+ Publicly-Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) inventory. As
described above in Section 5.3.1.4, the EPA Region II POTW
inventory was chosen as the primary source of data for this
category, with ASES POTW data used to supplement the EPA data
base and to compare with the EPA POTW data as a quality assurance
check. See Emission Inventory Appendix A in the appendix of this
volume for the list of New Jersey POTWs considered in ASES and
all POTWs considered in the project inventory.
»• Hospital sterilizers inventory. Only hospital sterilizers
that use ethylene oxide were considered for the point source
inventory. Since ethylene oxide was not considered in the final
list of fifteen pollutants for the inventory, these emissions
were not reported in the project inventory.
> Industrial dry cleaners inventory (SIC 7218). Emissions
for industrial dry cleaners are reported in APEDS and SMS. There
were no sources in this SIC code within the project area and,
therefore, no emissions were reported in the project inventory.
5.3.2 Area Source Inventories
The development of air toxics emissions estimates was based
upon methods utilizing demographic data. The data included
population and fuel use information. U.S. EPA documents on area
source emission inventory preparation were used as general
guidelines (U.S. EPA, 1981). Total VOC emissions on a per capita
basis were estimated for the activities. Speciation factors from
5-10
-------
published data (U.S. EPA, 1980a) were used to generate emissions
factors for the relevant individual pollutants.
5.3.2.1 NJDEP area source emission inventory - Area Source
Emission System (ASES)
New Jersey area source emissions data were assembled to
create ASES. To start the process of organizing the data, a grid
cell procedure was designed for the study area using square cells
of two kilometers (2km) per side. Grid cells were superimposed
upon the geographic region based upon boundaries defined as
fifths of Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) 10,000 meter grids.
Figure III-5-2 shows the resulting grid cell network. The cells
were enumerated by row and column number (starting at the bottom
left cell) and entered into a PC-based data management system,
the Area Source Emissions System (NJDEP, 1989). Additional
identification information was added in the prefix and the suffix
of the grid cell code. A prefix of "1" represents Middlesex
County, while "2" represents Union County. A suffix of "1"
indicates that the entire cell area is within the identified
county, while a "9" means that only a portion of the cell area is
within the identified county.
Since many emission estimates were based upon population,
assignment of cell population within Middlesex and Union counties
was rigorously determined using tract-level information and 1986
census updates. Estimates based on population were generated
from previously published data (NJDOL, 1987; Hughes, 1987; and
Fahley, 1987). Population by census tract was allocated to
individual cells based on 1986 and 1988 U.S. Bureau of the Census
maps and the defined grid network.
The emission estimates (in 1986 tons per year) for the area
source categories are summarized in Table III-5-19 in the
appendix of this volume.
»• Architectural coatings. Air toxics emissions estimates
for architectural coating operations were generated on a per
capita basis using published VOC and species emission factors
(U.S. EPA, 1980a; U.S. EPA, 1981) in conjunction with the
population data to generate emissions estimates for toluene and
xylene. See Emission Inventory Appendix D for a description of
how emission rates were calculated.
+ Area (residential) wood heating. Air toxics emissions
from residential wood heating were estimated using a procedure
developed by Lipfert (Lipfert, 1982). Wood use'per household was
estimated using a logarithmic formula which predicts a maximum
per capita consumption at a population density of 5,360 people
per square mile. Emissions were determined using the estimated
wood use per cell with emissions factors proportional to this
5-11
-------
use. This category was not evaluated by NYSDEC and, therefore,
estimated emissions for Middlesex and Union counties only are
presented.
+ Area (residential) oil heating. In order to estimate air
toxics emissions from residential oil heating, 1986 New Jersey
fuel use information was allocated to the per capita level within
Middlesex and Union counties. Published emission factors for
cadmium and formaldehyde (U.S. EPA, 1980a; U.S. EPA, 1981; U.S.
EPA, 1983) were converted from a picogram per joule basis to a
pound per capita basis using the statewide fuel use data. See
Emission Inventory Appendix D for a description of how emission
rates were calculated.
* Auto refinishing. Air toxics emissions estimates from
auto refinishing were determined on a per capita basis.
Published VOC and species emission factors (U.S. EPA, 1980a; U.S.
EPA, 1981) were used in conjunction with the population data to
generate emissions estimates for toluene and xylene. See
Emission Inventory Appendix D for a description of how emission
rates were calculated.
* Cold degreasing. Cold degreasing describes only small
parts cleaning operations such as those found in machine shops or
garages. The per capita factor for total VOCs was reduced by 50%
to account only for on-site emissions (U.S. EPA, 1980b).
Speciation was obtained from a national emissions profile
contained in Table B-l of "Control of Volatile Organic Emissions
from Solvent Metal Cleaning" (U.S. EPA, 1977). See Emission
Inventory Appendix D for a description of how emission rates were
calculated.
This category is likely to include activities which are also
covered within other parts of the point and area source
inventories. Unlike the emissions reported for those other
categories, however, emissions from this category are likely to
be fugitive in nature and, hence, are regarded as unlikely to be
double-counted in the project inventory as a whole.
* Consumer solvent use. Air toxics emissions from consumer
solvent use were determined on a per capita basis. Published
emission factors (U.S. EPA, 1980a; U.S. EPA, 1981; U.S. EPA,
1985) were used in conjunction with the population data to
generate emissions estimates for formaldehyde. See Emission
Inventory Appendix D for a description of how emission rates were
calculated.
+ Dry cleaning. Air toxics emissions of perchloroethylene
from commercial and coin-operated dry cleaning operations were
determined on a per capita basis. Published emission factors
(U.S. EPA, I980a; U.S. EPA, 1981) were used in conjunction with
the population data to estimate emissions. See Emission
5-12
-------
Inventory Appendix D for a description of how emission rates were
calculated.
^Gasoline distribution. Air toxics emissions estimates for
gasoline distribution were based upon 1986 New Jersey fuel use
data. For gas tank filling, an AP-42 emission factor (U.S. EPA,
1987) was used to generate an estimate for total VOCs by county;
these VOCs estimates were reduced to appropriate per capita
emission factors (U.S. EPA, 1981) in conjunction with the fuel
use data and cell population data. See Emission Inventory
Appendix D for a description of how emission rates were
calculated.
5.3.2.2 NYSDEC area source emission inventory - Staten Island
Area Inventory (SIAIR)
In order to continue with the concept of a unified and
consistent data base., NYSDEC followed a procedure similar to the
NJDEP ASES for area source categories even though it may have had
information on some of the categories in SMS. For consistency,
the New Jersey emissions factors were applied to the New York
area source types. The area source categories included by NYSDEC
were the same as those identified in Section 5.1.2, with the
exception of residential wood heating, which was not evaluated
for New York.
5.3.3 Mobile Source Inventories
As with area source estimates, mobile source estimates are
important because of their potentially large contribution to the
overall inventories for particular pollutants. Mobile source
inventories for total VOCs have been prepared for years in
support of state implementation plans (SIPs) for the attainment
of the National Ambient Air Quality Standard for ozone. The
interest in air toxics emissions from motor vehicles has resulted
in an assortment of emission factors by which the magnitude of
the problem may be assessed. Table III-5-3 presents the mobile
source emissions inventory for the project. Table III-5-E-1
presents the emission estimates provided by NJDEP, NYSDEC, and
EPA Region II. Table III-5-E-2 contains the emission factors
used to generate the estimates.
5.3.3.1 NJDEP mobile source inventory
The NJDEP mobile source inventory is managed by ASES.
Estimates of emissions from mobile sources were based on numbers
generated by NJDEP and the New Jersey Department of
Transportation (NJDOT, 1987) for the 1986 Reasonable Further
5-13
-------
Progress report for ozone and carbon monoxide (NJDEP, 1987) .
NJDOT assembled speed and truck fractions information from
traffic-counting stations statewide as input for analysis using
the model MOBILES.
MOBILES is an EPA computer program that calculates emission
factors for hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide, and oxides of
nitrogen from gasoline-fueled and diesel-fueled highway motor
vehicles. Emission factors are calculated for eight individual
vehicle types. Emissions estimates depend on various conditions
such as vehicle mix, fleet age, mileage accumulation rates,
vehicle speeds, and meteorological data.1
MOBILES summaries for Middlesex and Union Counties were
developed by NJDEP. These summaries included total HC emissions
in metric tons per day and vehicle miles traveled per day (VMT)
at the county level.
Available emission factors relevant to the pollutants under
study were reviewed; the most conservative, most recent emission
factors which represented fleetwide emissions (Carey, 1987;
Carhart and Walsh, 1987; U.S. EPA, 1985b) were selected for
speciation of the emissions. Emission factors provided on a
grams per mile basis were multiplied by countywide VMT; and those
provided on a percent of HC basis, by countywide HC to generate
countywide emissions for each chemical.
For each chemical, the speciated emissions totals for
Middlesex and Union Counties were divided by the combined total
populations of those counties to yield a per capita emission
factor. Emissions were allocated to grid cells by multiplying
the per capita emission factor by population of the cell. See
Emission Inventory Appendix E in the appendix of this volume for
the mobile source emission factors and the resulting emissions
estimates.
The NJDEP emission estimates (in 1986 tons per year) for the
mobile source inventory are presented in Table III-5-E-1.
1 MOBILES has been superseded by the MOBILE4 and MOBILE4.1
editions of the model released in 1989 and 1991, respectively.
MOBILES estimates hydrocarbons (HC) not VOC; whereas MOBILE4
and MOBILE4.1 estimate VOC as well as HC. NJDEP used the
MOBILES HC estimate as a VOC estimate.
5-14
-------
5.3.3.2 NYSDEC mobile source inventory
NYSDEC developed a mobile source inventory for Staten
Island; it is managed by the SIAIR data base. NYSDEC estimated
VMT and VOC emissions as described below.
Estimates of VMT for Staten Island were obtained from the
New York Metropolitan Transportation Council. Staten Island was
divided into three zones and the VMT were apportioned into 1km x
1km grid cells. Data were provided by street type—expressway,
arterial, or local. For mapping purposes, the 1km x 1km grids
were combined to form 2km x 2km grid cell values.
Estimates of total HC mobile source emissions per day for
Staten Island were based upon NYSDOT data, a run of MOBILES
(NYSDEC, 1989), and an EPA emission report for light-duty
gasoline-fueled vehicles within the New York City Metropolitan
Area (Butensky, 1990). Since mobile source HC emissions are in
direct proportion with the VMT, the emissions were apportioned to
the grid cells based on the VMT data.
NYSDEC used the same VMT-based (grains per mile) and
composition-based (% of total HC) pollutant-specific emission
factors as NJDEP. These factors were multiplied by the HC per
cell or VMT per cell to arrive at pounds pollutant per cell. The
resulting emission estimates are presented in Table III-5-E-1.
5.3.3.3 EPA Region II mobile source inventory
EPA Region II also developed a mobile source inventory for
the study region. It was used as a quality assurance check of
the state inventories; and as a source of an emission estimate
for hexane, which was not included in the state inventories.
The emissions estimates developed by EPA Region II are found
in Emission Inventory Appendix E. The EPA Region II mobile
source emissions inventory covered all of Union County, Staten
Island, and Brooklyn, and portions of Middlesex (88.1%), Hudson
(77.8%), Essex (72.9%), and Monmouth (30.4%) Counties. (See
Table III-5-E-1.) This is a larger area than that covered by the
state inventories. The values for the percent of the county
included were based upon the population of the covered
municipalities according to 1988 census data (USDOC, 1988).
The generation of the EPA Region II mobile source emissions
estimates proceeded as described below.
1. New Jersey (NJDOT, 1990) and New York (NYSDEC, 1989) mobile
source data in terms of annual mean HC emissions were
5-15
-------
assembled as VOC tons per day (TPD) per county2 (Butensky,
1990). Table III-5-E-3 presents VOC data for light-duty
gasoline vehicles within five counties in New Jersey (Essex,
Hudson, Middlesex, Monmouth, and Union) and two boroughs of
New York City (Brooklyn and Staten Island).
2. The percent of each county to be used in the estimates was
established by summing populations of covered municipalities
within each county of interest, and dividing by the total
population for that county.
3. The countywide emissions of the specific pollutants were
estimated using an average composition profile for tailpipe
emissions from gasoline vehicles (U.S. EPA, 1990) as
follows:
countywide VOC x emission factor for specific
pollutant = countywide emissions of specific pollutant.
See Table III-5-E-4.
4. Estimated emissions for the covered portions of the county
were generated as follows:
countywide emissions of specific pollutant x % of
county covered = quantity of specific pollutant
emitted in covered portion of county.
5. Within the covered municipalities of each county, emissions
of specific pollutants were apportioned to cells assuming
that VOC emissions were in direct and constant proportion
with population, and that VOCs were uniform throughout a
covered municipality. Tables III-5-E-5 through 11 present
in pounds per day and tons per year the results for each
covered municipality in New Jersey, and for Staten Island
and Brooklyn.
The resulting emissions estimates are presented in Table III-5-E-1,
5.3.3.4 SI/NJ UATAP mobile source inventory
The level of detail available for the NYSDEC emissions
estimate for Staten Island was different from that for the NJDEP
estimates for Middlesex and Union Counties. To provide
consistency in the development of the area and mobile source
inventory, per capita pollutant-specific emission factors derived
from the New Jersey emissions estimates for Middlesex and Union
2 The EPA Region II estimate did not distinguish between total
HC and total VOC.
5-16
-------
Counties were used to allocate emissions to each cell in Staten
Island based on cell population. Note that, since the combined
population of Middlesex and Union Counties is 2.8 times that of
Staten Island, this per capita approach results in mobile source
emissions estimates that are 2.8 times higher for the New Jersey
portion of the study area than for Staten Island. Table III-5-E-1
contains the estimates prepared by NYSDEC, as well as those
calculated using the derived per capita emission factors.
Table III-5-E-2 contains per capita emission factors derived
from the New Jersey emission estimates for the New Jersey
counties and, for comparison, those derived from the New York and
the EPA Region II estimates for Staten Island.
The NYSDEC and EPA Region II mobile source inventories
provided a comparison and quality assurance check of the approach
adopted for the project inventory. Table III-5-E-2 shows that
the NYSDEC-derived factors are 3.1 to 7.8 times higher than the
EPA-derived factors; and 1.1 to 2.2 times higher than the NJDEP-
derived factors. Table III-5-35 and Figures III-5-21 and 22
demonstrate the differences in the area and mobile source
emission estimates for benzene for each cell in the study area
when the NJDEP and NYSDEC approaches to estimation of Staten
Island emissions are used.
5.4 MICROINVENTORY
Microinventories were developed for each of the air
monitoring sites in the study area over the course of
approximately one year, from the fall of 1988 to the end of
summer of 1989.
5.4.1 Introduction
A microinventory is the identification of all stationary
sources of air pollution within a defined area around each air
monitor. Its purpose is to help explain potential anomalies in
monitoring data that may be attributable to the impact of sources
close to the monitors, and, thus reflect local air quality rather
than project-wide patterns of air quality.
For this project, the microinventories were to include all
sources within one kilometer (1km) of each monitor. In all
cases, the microinventories included areas slightly beyond the
circle of 1km radius.
5-17
-------
5.4.2 Methodology
For each of the 15 monitoring sites in the SI/NJ UATAP study
area, a team of surveyors was assembled. The teams generally
consisted of representatives from EPA, NYSDEC, and/or NJDEP. For
all sites except the Carteret, NJ, site, at least one of the
surveyors (usually a NYSDEC or NJDEP representative) was a
certified air pollution inspector with credentials to allow
him/her to enter any facility.
Prior to the survey team's conducting a microinventory at
any site, the EPA compiled a list of sources within a three-
kilometer radius around the monitor. From the state inventories,
NJDEP and NYSDEC provided EPA with printouts of all major and
minor VOC sources, and some particulate sources, listed for the
counties included in the SI/NJ UATAP study. A major source was
defined as one that emitted, or had the potential to emit, 100
tons or more per year of any individual substance. A minor
source was defined as one that emitted, or had the potential to
emit, less than 100 tons per year of any individual substance.
The inventories used were the NYSDEC SMS, the New York City
gasoline station inventory, and the NJDEP APEDS. From the state
data, EPA developed a unified spreadsheet containing the name,
address, SIC code, universal transverse mercator coordinates
(UTMs), and total VOC and particulate emissions for each minor
source, and speciated emissions for each major source within the
study area. From the spreadsheet, sources within three
kilometers of the monitor (determined from UTMs) were extracted.
This list provided the team with a sense of the types and numbers
of sources it could expect to find around each site.
While only sources within 1km of the monitors were to be
included in the microinventories, it was found after the third
microinventory (Carteret) that UTMs provided in APEDS or SMS were
generally not accurate to within one kilometer. This was
demonstrated by comparison of a plot of the Carteret sources by
their listed UTM coordinates, to a map drawn from their observed
locations; see Figures III-5-7 and 8 in the appendix of this
volume. To compensate for these inaccuracies, sources from APEDS
and SMS that were within three kilometers of the project monitor
were included in the computer-generated field report for each
microinventory.
Also prior to conducting each microinventory, the team
marked on a map the monitor location and the area (the circle
with a 1km radius circle) to be surveyed (Note: To avoid
copyright infringement, EPA Region II created microinventory maps
on its Geographical Information System for use in this report.)
5-18
-------
At each microinventory site, the team met at the monitor
location. Special note of sources directly near the monitor was
made. At very commercial sites, the team often split into groups
to cover smaller areas. Within each microinventory area, the
staff walked and/or drove every block, and went beyond the
boundary of the 1km radius to make certain no sources were
missed. The name, address, and type of each VOC and/or
particulate source were noted. Whenever a source could not be
identified (e.g., stacks were observed on the roof of a
nondescript building), an inspector entered the facility to
obtain the necessary information. As information on the
facilities was collected, the exact location of each source was
noted on the microinventory area maps.
After the surveys were completed, EPA developed
microinventory site summaries. A discussion of the results
follows in this section of this report. The microinventory maps
and listings of the identified minor and major sources within 1km
of the air monitoring sites are presented in Figures III-5-5
through 19, and associated Tables III-5-20 through 33,
respectively, located in the appendix of this volume. The table
for each site includes a qualitative assessment of the
microinventory for the site, noting whether the area surveyed was
residential, commercial, industrial, or mixed in character.
5.4.3 Microinventorv Results
A general summary of the microinventories is presented in
the table below in chronological order beginning with the first
survey conducted. The table includes the number of sources found
within the 1km radius at each site, the number of sources
appearing in the state point source data base(s), and the percent
of the number of sources in the state inventories versus the
number of sources found in the field.
* Of SOURCES # IN STATE X IN STATE
Site name FOUND INVENTORY INVENTORY
Travis, SI 8 4 50
Port Richmond, SI 56 9 16
Carteret. New Jersey 40 21 53
Elizabeth, NJ 119 49 41
Seuaren, NJ 31 17 55
Great Kills, SI 25 9 36
Tottenville, SI 13 4 44
Highland Park, NJ 16 7 44
Piscatauay, NJ 0 0 na
Rossville, SI 15 4 27
Pumping Station (near Staten Island Mall), SI 11 5 45
Eltingville (Annadale), SI 5 1 20
Susan Wagner H.S. (Uesterleigh), SI 17 3 18
Dongan Hills, SI 27 7 26
Clifton (Bayley Seton Hospital), SI 51 8 16
Overall sumnary of 15 sites 434 148 34
5-19
-------
The process of performing the microinventories produced
several valuable results beyond the inventories themselves. For
example, it was discovered that both the APEDS and SMS data bases
did contain information on all major sources in the area.
However, the inventories only captured about 34% of all sources
within the microinventory areas. Dry cleaners, auto refinishers,
and bakeries were consistently missing from both data bases.
Certain minor source categories were unregulated at the time when
the microinventories were conducted and, therefore, would not
have been found in the state data bases. Thus, the reported
capture rates do not reflect the performance of the state
agencies in permitting regulated sources. Some sources
unregulated at the time of the microinventories are now subject
to air pollution control regulations and captured by the state
data bases.
A second result was the discovery of potential violations.
Because each team included a certified air pollution inspector,
the identification of illegal activities allowed for immediate
action. In some cases, illegal operations (e.g., an unpermitted
rock crushing operation at one site, and open burning at other
sites) were encountered and shut down on the spot. In other
cases, obvious violations were noted (e.g., large gas stations
without Stage I or Stage II vapor recovery systems); or potential
violators were noted and the information was passed on to EPA and
state enforcement groups. This exercise provided a valuable link
between inventory groups and enforcement programs, which often do
not have much contact.
One of the major goals of the microinventory work was to
enable evaluations of causal relationships between high or
unusual ambient air concentrations and the influences of local
sources. In an informal validation of its usefulness towards
this end, the microinventory revealed the presence of two dry
cleaners, emitters of perchloroethylene, within a block of a
monitor for which unusually high concentrations of
perchloroethylene were reported.
5.5 EMISSIONS MAPPING
5.5.1 Mapping Approach
The SI/NJ UATAP Mapping System was designed specifically for
this project. The mapping system, created by Roch Baamonde, used
a combination of Lotus 1-2-3, Graphwriter, and Freelance software
packages in a PC environment.
5-20
-------
The data used in mapping each of the pollutants, both for
area/mobile and point sources, are attached in Tables III-5-34
through 40. Table III-5-40 presents the area and mobile source
emissions inventory data for the five pollutants mapped. The
emissions quantities were aggregated by substance for each grid
cell (within Middlesex and Union Counties and Staten Island) for
all area source activities and mobile sources. For point
sources, the data were awarded priority in the following
descending order: TRI data, APEDS/SMS data, POTW Inventory data,
and ASES data. Thus, if TRI data were available for a facility,
they were used; if not, APEDS or SMS were checked, and so forth.
5.5.2 Point and Area/Mobile Source Mapping
The five pollutants mapped were benzene, cadmium,
formaldehyde, methylene chloride (dichloromethane) and
perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene). Two types of maps were
made: (1) the maps of combined emission densities from area and
mobile sources, and (2) the bubble maps showing the location and
relative magnitude of emissions from point sources. The origins
of the emissions estimates used in the mapping activity are
described in Section 5.3.
The data were compiled in a spreadsheet format in Lotus
1-2-3. Named ranges from the spreadsheets were then read
directly into graphs created by Graphwriter. Two types of graphs
were generated: (1) X-Y graphs for area/mobile source maps, and
(2) bubble graphs for point source maps.
Note that these maps do not represent the ambient air
quality modeling impacts of the contributing sources. The
emissions density and bubble maps represent only those sources
and/or source categories identified and evaluated in this study,
and the relative magnitudes of the emissions densities in the
area. Additionally, particularly in the cases of area and mobile
sources, the quantities are estimated (not actual or known) air
toxics emissions as described throughout this report. Section
5.1.2 identifies the eight (stationary) area source categories
evaluated.
5.5.2.1 Area/mobile source maps
The area/mobile source maps were created on a grid of 2km x
2km cells, with UTM-easting values as the x-axis and UTM-northing
values as the y-axis. The marker used was a square with an area
of 4 square kilometers (i.e., 2km x 2km); the UTM values used in
the mapping were the midpoints of each 2x2 cell. The shading
of each cell represents its emission density categorized as one
of the following ranges: >0 and <5 TPY, >5 and <10, >10 and <15,
5-21
-------
>15 and <20, >20 and <30, and >30 TPY. (Note: Table III-5-40
lists the shading category numerically, since differences in
shading became difficult to distinguish following
photoreproduction of the maps.) Using Freelance, the graph was
overlaid onto a digitized map of the study area. The resulting
maps provided a fairly accurate depiction of the area. The
emission density maps are Figures III-5-21, 24, 26, 28, and 30.
5.5.2.2 Point source maps
Point source maps were created by reading the data directly
from Lotus spreadsheets into Graphwriter to create a graph which
was then overlaid in Freelance onto the map. The bubble graph is
similar to the X-Y graph in that it places points according to
their X and Y locations; however, it also reads a third data
element—the magnitude of emissions. It creates circles
(bubbles) at the points that reflect the relative magnitudes of
emissions. Thus, facilities with lower emissions for a pollutant
are shown as smaller bubbles; and those with higher emissions, as
larger bubbles. Since the software could create only 36 bubbles
at a time, pollutants like dichloromethane, for which 80
facilities were reported, were addressed by making three separate
graphs, combining them, and hand-labeling the facilities in
excess of the 36 labeled automatically.
The bubble graphs were overlaid onto a map of the study
area. Since some of the emissions maps are too dense to read
clearly, the point source data are provided in Tables III-5-34
and III-5-36 through 39, interleaved with the bubble maps,
Figures III-5-20, 23, 25, 27, and 29.
5.5.3 Comparison of the Results from Different Approaches to
Estimation of Area and Mobile Source Emissions
As part of the mapping effort for area sources, the
different approaches used to generate the area and mobile source
emissions estimates were compared. Specifically, New Jersey
applied population-based emission factors for estimating mobile
source emissions, while New York used VMT data. New Jersey also
used population-based factors for emissions from gasoline
stations. For the New York region within the study area, NYSDEC
used throughput and controls data for each station to generate
the emissions as point sources, then aggregated these emissions
for all the stations, and apportioned the aggregate on the basis
of the population within each cell in Staten Island. Since (a)
throughput and VMT data were not available for New Jersey, and
(b) consistency was regarded as important in generating the
project emission inventory, the area and mobile sources emissions
5-22
-------
for the New York area were re-developed according to the New
Jersey population-based methods.
Table III-5-35 presents the results from the two methods
when applied to benzene emissions in Staten Island; in this table
the shaded column presents the net difference in each cell, in
tons per year, between the results of the New York approach and
the New Jersey approach. On an individual cell basis, the
differences ranged from 0 to 25 TPY; but the difference of 193
TPY across Staten Island as a whole was 35 percent, considered
acceptable when working with estimated emissions, particularly
those of air toxics. The results are shown graphically in
Figures III-5-21 and III-5-22.
5.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
The quality of the data was assessed by comparing the
following: (1) multiple inventory data bases which include the
same sources, and/or (2) various emissions estimating techniques.
The relative levels of precision, accuracy, representativeness,
and completeness of the data bases were not assessed.
5.6.1 Microinventories
The microinventory surveys, the first emission inventory
activity, supported the QA effort. They identified deficiencies
in the state point source air toxics inventories. The results of
the microinventories indicated that APEDS and SMS included all of
the major sources which were identified through the field
surveys; however, minor sources (e.g. dry cleaners, auto
refinishers, and bakeries) were often absent from these data
bases. Note that certain minor source categories were
unregulated at the time when the microinventories were conducted
and, therefore, would not have been found in the state data
bases.
5.6.2 Point Source Data Quality Assurance
The foundation of the air toxics emissions data for point
sources was the 1988 TRI. The point source data base for this
project was assembled by EPA Region II and forwarded to the
States for review and addition of sources not covered by the TRI
reporting criteria. This data set included POTW emissions as
prepared by Baamonde. Point sources found in APEDS and SMS, as
well as those area sources treated as point sources in the
5-23
-------
project, were added to complete the unified point source data
base.
A review of data bases for duplication of records was
conducted. Some facilities appeared as two distinct records—
e.g., one under a division name within TRI and one under the
parent company name in the state data base. When duplications
were found, they were eliminated. Additionally, a few errors in
TRI-entered emissions data were identified by the States.
To provide additional opportunities for comparison of the
data, pollutant-specific emissions information from all of the
data sources used—TRI, APEDS and SMS, EPA Region II POTW
Inventory, and ASES (for area sources treated as point sources) —
were included in the project point source inventory, Tables III-
5-4 through 18.
5.6.3 Area Source Data Quality Assurance
The area source emission inventory for New Jersey was
developed under contract for NJDEP with a subsequent transfer of
methodology and emission factors from NJDEP to NYSDEC. EPA-
prescribed methods using simple population-based models were
employed to estimate substance usage and emissions factors on a
per capita basis for all specified activities except residential
wood burning. The emission factors were reviewed for
representativeness. They are provided in Emission Inventory
Appendix D where they are available for comparison to factors
derived by other researchers. Sample calculations were performed
to check that the spreadsheets used to generate the estimates
were correct; no errors were identified.
APEDS summaries for toluene and xylene included auto
refinishing sources. These facilities, identified by SIC codes
(7532 - 1987 classification; and, 7531 and 7535 - 1977
classification), were deleted from the point source inventory
since they were to be covered by the area source inventory; auto
refinishers in APEDS but outside of Middlesex and Union counties
were deleted from the point source inventory and not included in
the area source inventory.
5.6.4 Mobile Source Data Quality Assurance
Three different approaches were considered in arriving at
the project inventory for mobile source emissions. NJDEP
employed simple population-based models, and emission factors
which were (a) converted from a gram-per-mile basis to a pound-
per-person (per capita) basis or (b) derived from total VOC
5-24
-------
estimates and speciated to a per capita basis; 1986 VMT and
population data were used. NYSDEC used grid-level VMT data to
allocate VMT and estimated VOC emissions to one-kilometer areas
of Staten Island; and the pollutant-specific emission factors (in
grams per mile and percent of total hydrocarbons) used by NJDEP.
In a third approach, EPA used 1988 population estimates and 1990
VMT/VOC data for larger areas of New Jersey and New York than
were covered by the States, and a different set of pollutant-
specific emission factors.
For consistency in the project mobile source inventory,
emissions for the New York area were estimated using the NJDEP
population-based approach.
Per capita emission factors derived from the three estimates
of mobile source emissions for Staten Island are provided in
Table III-5-E-2 in the appendix of this volume, where they are
available for comparison to factors derived by other researchers.
Sample calculations were performed to check that the
spreadsheets used to generate the estimates were correct; no
errors were identified.
A comparison of the results of the mobile source emission
estimation techniques was provided for the case of benzene. The
emissions estimates for benzene (in tons per year) as generated
by the New Jersey population-based method, the New York VMT-VOC
method, and the EPA Region II VMT-VOC method are presented below.
Mobile source benzene emissions (TRY)
bv county
Method Middlesex* Union Staten Island
NJDEP population method 502.09 443.45 336.35
NYSOEC VOC-VMT method N/A N/A 532.35
EPA Region II VOC-VMT method 195.90 134.32 150.75
* Estimate is for 88% of total county population
Since the New Jersey population-based method was applied to
the development of the area and mobile source inventories, the
New Jersey approach was considered the standard for this
assessment. The EPA Region II method yielded estimates that were
54% (Staten Island) to 70% (Union County) less than the NJDEP-
based estimates; the NYSDEC estimate for Staten Island was 58%
higher than the NJDEP-based estimate. The following differences
5-25
-------
in approach may have contributed to differences in the resulting
emissions estimates:
1. The NYSDEC and EPA Region II estimates addressed only light-
duty gasoline-fueled vehicles; whereas the NJDEP estimates
included diesel-fueled and heavy-duty vehicles, as well.
2. The pollutant-specific emission factors used by EPA Region
II were from a newer reference (U.S. EPA, 1990) than the
factors used by New Jersey and New York; they may reflect an
assumed relatively newer fleet age.
3. While Staten Island's population density is lower than that
of nearby New Jersey, it provides major traffic arteries
between New Jersey and New York; this may contribute to a
higher per capita emission rate for Staten Island (as
reflected by the NYSDEC estimate) than that derived from
estimates for Middlesex and Union counties.
Differences of this magnitude, less than a factor of 100, are not
unusual when estimating air toxics emissions.
5.7 LIMITATIONS OF THE INVENTORY
The usefulness of an emissions inventory is highly dependent
upon the type and quality of information presented. In order to
provide a comprehensive data base for the three source
categories—point, area, and mobile—without compromising data
quality, the inventory was limited to fewer chemicals than were
addressed by the ambient air monitoring effort.
5.7.1 Limitations of the Data Bases
The limitations of the inventory have been identified so
that the useful bounds of the data may be easily discerned.
Source-specific data may be requested from the appropriate state.
The project inventory was assembled from information (1)
available from sources within the state agencies or EPA, or (2)
generated by the participating agencies based on data and
methodologies available from a wide-ranging variety of sources.
There are notable limitations in all of the sources of
information utilized in the assembly of this project's air toxics
emission inventory. The limitations are discussed below.
5-26
-------
5.7.1.1 Point sources
>TRI. The Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) contains data
required of facilities meeting the following three reporting
criteria: the (l)the facility's main business activity must be in
the manufacturing sector, i.e., have an SIC code in major groups
20 through 39; (2) the facility must have 10 or more full-time
employees; and (3) the facility must manufacture, process, or
otherwise use listed substances in quantities in excess of a
specified threshold. Additionally, the emission estimates need
be reported to only two significant figures. Therefore, the
larger the estimated emissions, the greater the consequence of
this reporting convention.
The advantages to TRI were the following: (1) it was
considered a data base of actual releases in that the emissions
estimates were generated by the facilities based upon actual
operating data for the reporting year; and (2) TRI provided
estimates of fugitive air emissions. Fugitive emissions are
potentially significant since they may or may not be included in
the states point source data bases, fully dependent upon the
emissions sources included by the facilities under this heading.
»• APEDS. APEDS, the NJDEP point source data base, provided
an inventory of substances based upon maximum permit-allowable
emission rates. This is described in Section 5.3.1.2.
Therefore, APEDS may provide conservative overestimates of annual
air emissions. APEDS may or may not contain fugitive emission
rates as discussed above for TRI.
Within New Jersey, certain source operations, or equipment,
are grandfathered if they existed prior to regulations covering
like sources or equipment. A grandfathered source is generally
not subject to the emissions control requirements of like sources
placed into operation after the promulgation of an air pollution
control regulation. Nevertheless, many grandfathered sources are
either permitted or registered; i.e., emissions for the source
are known by NJDEP although submission of this information is not
required.
The advantage to APEDS is that it provided information for a
large number of facilities, both within and outside of the
manufacturing sector, not covered by TRI.
»SMS. SMS, the NYSDEC point source data base, provided an
inventory of substances based on emission data for all permitted
sources. Data in SMS are obtained from applications for
industrial processes, combustion and incineration sources, and
gasoline dispensing facilities which are required to install
Stage I and Stage II controls.
5-27
-------
The advantage to SMS was that it provided information for
facilities not covered by TRI.
5.7.1.2 Area sources
The assessment of air toxics for area sources, including
those treated as point sources in this project, provided air
toxics emissions information not traditionally found in state
data bases at the time of the project. The limitations of the
project inventory regarding these source types were based in the
methodologies and emission factors applied to the estimation of
air toxics emissions. Generally, the methodologies followed EPA
guidelines for the estimation of volatile organic compounds
emissions from such sources, and then involved speciation for air
toxics using documented emission factors.
The methods provided a generic approach to estimating air
toxics emissions for the activity categories, thereby generating
emission estimates that were representative of the activity
category, but not necessarily specific to the activities of any
individual facility. The inventory could be enhanced by the
development and use of source-specific emission factors, e.g.,
for dry cleaners and landfills.
Also, limitations are imparted by the timeframe of the data
supporting the emissions estimates—e.g., population data, fuel
use data, landfill volume and VOC emissions, and TSDF data on
processing of volatile organics.
Per capita-based emission estimates assume certain activity
levels for each source category. It is possible that specific
activities did not exist within the project area, or did not
occur as extensively as the resulting emissions estimates
indicate. Conversely, it is possible that certain activities
were more prevalent than indicated by the emissions estimates.
This was one reason for conducting the microinventories around
the air monitoring stations. Expanded microinventories would
identify the actual density of operations for any of the
categories.
The area source inventory should be viewed as a screening
level inventory that indicates the potential impact of the
covered activities on the total air toxics inventory. It is
recommended that further investigations be conducted for those
activity categories with significant contributions to the project
emissions inventory.
5-28
-------
5.7.1.3 Mobile sources
The limitations of the mobile source inventory are similar
to those discussed above for area sources since the methodologies
followed similar approaches. MOBILES was the computer model
applied to generate estimates of VOCs. Inputs to the model
included known and averaged data as well as certain assumptions
about the vehicle population. The emission estimates were
quantified by grid cell based on population factors.
As is the case for the area source inventory, the mobile
source inventory should be viewed as a screening level inventory.
This approach did not provide resolution of the data relative to
the major roadways within the project area. Where more accurate
numbers are required, it would be necessary to resolve the data
using models designed for such analysis, e.g., line source models
using inputs specific to the area of concern.
5.7.1.4 Comprehensiveness
The comprehensiveness of source coverage is an important
consideration. As identified through the microinventories, there
were gaps in the state data bases inherent to the permitting
regulations upon which the data bases were founded. Also, there
were limitations in the information generated through the point,
area, and mobile source inventory efforts. Certain source
categories were not or could not be evaluated in this study. For
example, while air toxics emissions from publicly-owned treatment
works have been estimated, there is no comparable information on
privately-owned treatment works within the study area.
5.7.1.5 Temporal variations
There was no attempt to evaluate temporal variations in the
data. An assessment of peak environmental releases was not
possible. No distinction was made between releases from
continuous operations and from batch-type operations. The
inventory is a snapshot in time representing annual releases of
air toxics for the period roughly estimated as 1986 through 1989.
New sources came into operation during this time, while many
sources ceased operations.
5.7.2 Limited Substance List
The limited number of substances addressed may be the most
significant limitation of the inventory. A review of the
coverage of source categories, the number of facilities within
those categories, and/or the detail of the area and mobile source
5-29
-------
data indicates that compiling a comprehensive inventory for all
of the chemicals addressed by the ambient monitoring effort,
particularly across state lines, is a substantial endeavor.
However, comparison to the results of the ambient air
sampling campaign shows that this emission inventory did succeed
in including those project chemicals found at the highest
concentrations in the ambient air of the area studied.
5.8 RESULTS
The air toxics emissions inventory for point, area, and
mobile sources for a select group of substances has been
evaluated and assembled into a final data base for this project.
The results are presented in Tables III-5-4 through III-5-19. A
summary of the contributions from these three groups of sources
is found in Table III-5-3. As noted in other urban air toxics
studies (e.g., U.S. EPA, 1985), area and mobile sources
contributed significantly to the total inventory and comprised
the dominant source of emissions for certain pollutants.
Point sources were identified as the only sources of carbon
tetrachloride and chloroform, and the dominant sources of toluene
(63%), n-hexane (71%), dichloromethane (91%), 1,1,1-
trichloroethane (72%), trichloroethylene (80%), and cadmium
(93%).
Motor vehicles were determined to be the dominant source of
emissions of benzene (88%), formaldehyde (75%), and xylene (55%).
Also, it was estimated that a large quantity of toluene, 1,757
tons per year (29% of total), was generated by mobile sources
within the study area.
Area sources were responsible for the majority of the
perchloroethylene emissions (66%). The overwhelming majority was
attributed to dry cleaning while the remainder was attributed to
cold degreasing operations. See Table III-5-19.
Another comparison of the total emissions of the inventoried
pollutants in this study area is given in Figure III-5-3.
Overall, toluene (6,015 tpy) and xylenes (3,578 tpy) are the
pollutants with the highest rates of emissions.
Some questions may be raised concerning the
representativeness of those aspects of the mobile' source
inventory which were based on the population-based models since
both Staten Island and the adjacent areas of New Jersey are major
transportation corridors whose traffic volumes may be unrelated
to the size of the resident population. The NJDEP population-
5-30
-------
based method used in this study yields estimates for mobile
source benzene emissions that are 2.2 to 3.3 times those obtained
using the EPA Region II method.
The microinventory work identified deficiencies in the
existing state point source air toxics inventories. The state
data bases captured an average of 34% of the sources reported at
the 15 sites where microinventories were performed. The
uncaptured sources were classified as minor (dry cleaners, auto
refinishers, and bakeries). Some of these minor sources were
subject to existing state regulations; others were not. However
all these sources were considered to be important potential
contributors to air toxics emissions burdens in the areas of the
monitors. The microinventory work demonstrated a need to improve
the overall quality of emissions inventories and the importance
of realtime coordination between inventory work groups and field
enforcement units.
One of the most important discoveries of the microinventory
activity as well as the study was that relatively high
perchloroethylene concentrations at one monitoring site appeared
to be attributable to releases from two dry cleaners situated
within one block of the sampler. This finding appeared to
reaffirm the significant contribution that small local ground-
based sources are likely to make to the ambient air
concentrations.
5.9 GENERAL SUMMARY
The types of information, sources of information,
methodologies to develop emission estimates, and presentation of
the emission inventory were selected to provide a useful air
toxics emissions resource. This emission inventory contains
information previously not available from the state emission
inventories, and describes tools to expand upon the inventory.
Summary assessments of the air toxics emission inventory in
terms of the magnitudes of the emissions and their distribution
across the point, area, and mobile source categories are
presented in Table III-5-3 and Figures III-5-3 and 4.
The development of the microinventories was important beyond
their contribution to the inventory for this project.
Enforcement programs and inventory programs often do not have an
active dialogue regarding air pollution sources; rather,
enforcement programs usually receive inventory information from
which facility audits are performed. Conducting the
microinventories placed the inventory staff into the field to
5-31
-------
assess actual source densities, and involved enforcement programs
staff in an inventory process.
The 1988 TRI was the preferred data base for the point
source inventory in this project. It was supplemented by the
state permitting data bases and emissions estimates developed for
area sources treated as point sources.
Conservative estimation techniques were applied to the
development of the area and mobile source inventories so that the
air toxics data presented for the sources included in this study
are more likely to be at the upper bound of the emissions range
than at the lower bound. Emissions inventory evaluations
conducted as quality assurance components of this effort indicate
that the data are reasonable. Where the summary data indicate
significant contributions by the area and mobile source
categories, further investigations and a more refined analysis
should be conducted to validate the implications.
The objectives of the emission inventory component of this
project were (1) the development of an air toxics emission
inventory that included point, area, and mobile sources; and (2)
the evaluation of general abatement strategies for toxic air
pollutants. This emission inventory may be used in support of
the second objective.
5-32
-------
5.10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This section was prepared by Mr. Andrew Opperman and Ms.
Joann Held, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection and
Energy, Division of Environmental Quality; Mr. Sam Lieblich and
Mr. Michael Kormanik, New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation, Region 2; and Mr. Roch Baamonde, U.S. EPA Region
II, Office of Policy and Management. The Emission Inventory
Subcommittee expresses its sincere gratitude for assistance
provided in the project by the following individuals:
from the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
and Energy, Thomas Ballou (former), Olga Boyko, Sarah
Chmielewski, Michael Cisek, Greg Cooper, Vanessa Day,
AnnMarie Gereg;
from the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation, Burt Breitburg, Wallace Krawitsky, Dave
MacPherson (retired), Syed Mehdi, Carlos Morales, James
Ralston, Russell Twaddell;
from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II,
Greg Allande, Thomas Ballou (former), Lauren Bradford
(participant in National Network of Environmental Management
Studies), Jeff Butensky, Alfredo Forte (former), Rudy
Kapichak, Mark Karrell (former), Lisa Lui.
5-33
-------
5.11 REFERENCES
Baamonde, R.C.; Martinovich, B. (1987) Report on emissions
inventory development for volatile organic compounds from
publicly owned treatment works in the New York and New Jersey
ozone nonattainment areas. Presented at: The Air Pollution
Control Association specialty conference for ozone; November;
Hartford, CT. Available from: Volume VI of the Staten Island/New
Jersey Urban Air Toxics Assessment Project report.
Butensky, J.S. (1990) Emissions report for light duty gasoline
vehicles within the New York City metropolitan area. New York,
NY: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II.
Carey, P.M. (1987) Air toxics emissions from motor vehicles. Ann
Arbor, MI: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile
Sources; EPA report no. EPA-AA-TSS-PA-86-5.
Carhart, B.S.; Walsh, M.P. (1987) Potential contributions to
ambient concentrations of air toxics by mobile sources, part I.
Presented at: The 80th annual meeting of the Air Pollution
Control Association; New York, NY; paper no. 87-2.5.
Fahley, W. (1987) New Jersey Department of Labor, personal
communication to Engineering-Science concerning population
statistics for New Jersey. Trenton, NJ.
Gleason, P. (1992) New York City Department of Sanitation,
personal communication to Carol Bellizzi concerning Fresh Kills
Landfill. New York, N.Y.
Hughes, C. (1987) New Jersey Department of Labor, personal
communication to Engineering-Science concerning population
statistics for New Jersey. Trenton, NJ.
Lipfert, F.W. (1982) A national assessment of the air quality
impacts of residential firewood use. Presented at: Air Pollution
Control Association residential wood and coal specialty
conference; Louisville, KY.
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. (1987) 1986
RFP report: report on reasonable further progress (RFP) to
achieve the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone and
carbon monoxide. Trenton, NJ. Available through: Division of
Environmental Quality.
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. (1989) The
New Jersey air toxics emission inventory system: Area Source
Emissions System (ASES) Trenton, NJ: Division of Environmental
Quality.
5-34
-------
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. (1990) New
Jersey area source emissions, appendix, volume II. Trenton, NJ:
Division of Environmental Quality.
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. (1987) Solid
Waste Facility Directory; Trenton, NJ: Division of Solid Waste
Management.
New Jersey Department of Labor. (1987) Population estimates for
New Jersey: July 1, 1986. Trenton, NJ.
New Jersey Department of Transportation. (1987) Transportation
control plan, [draft], Trenton, NJ.
New Jersey Department of Transportation. (1990) Yearly average
highway emissions by municipality. Trenton, NJ.
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. (1989)
MOBILE3 computer summary. Albany, NY: Bureau of Abatement
Planning.
Prentice Hall Information Services. (1988) standard Industrial
Classification Manual.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1987) Northeast 1986 population and
1985 per capita income estimates for counties and incorporated
places. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census; Series P-26, no.
86-NE-SC.
U.S. Department of Commerce. (1988) Northeast 1988 population and
1987 per capita income estimates for counties and incorporated
places. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census; Series P-26, no.
88-NE-SC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1977) Control of volatile
organic compounds from solvent metal cleaning. Research Triangle
Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. EPA
report no. EPA 450/2-77-022.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1980a) Volatile organic
compound (VOC) species data manual, second edition. Research
Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards;
EPA report no. EPA 450/4-80-016.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1980b) Procedures for the
preparation of emission inventories for volatile organic
compounds, volume I, second edition. Research Triangle Park, NC:
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards; EPA report no. EPA
450/2-77-028.
5-35
-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1981) Procedures for
emission inventory preparation, volumes III and IV: area
sources and mobile sources. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards; EPA report no. EPA 450/4-81-
026C and EPA 450/4-81-026d.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1983) Receptor model
source composition library. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of
Air Quality Planning and Standards; EPA report no. EPA 450/4-85-
002.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1985a) Compilation of air
pollutant emission factors, volume I: stationary point and area
sources, AP-42, fourth edition. Research Triangle Park, NC:
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1987) Preliminary
compilation of air pollution emission factors for selected air
toxics compounds. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1990) VOC profile report;
Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards, EPA report no. EPA 450/2-90-001A.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1985b) The air toxics
problem in the United States: an analysis of cancer risks for
selected pollutants. Washington, DC: Office of Air and Radiation
and Office of Policy, Planning, and Evaluation; EPA report no.
450/1-85/001. Available from: NTIS, Springfield, VA; PB85-225175.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1986) Report to Congress
on the discharge of hazardous wastes to publicly owned treatment
works. Washington, DC: Office of Water Regulations and Standards,
EPA report no. EPA 530-SW-86-004.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region II. (1989) SARA
toxics assessment: a review of the SARA Title II Section 313 data
for an area in northern New Jersey. New York, NY: Air and Waste
Management Division.
Vogt, W.G.; Conrad, E.T. (1987) VOC emissions rates from solid
waste landfills. In: WasteTech Proceedings. San Francisco, CA.
5-36
-------
Figure III-5-1; Boundaries for the SI/NJ point and area/mobile
source emissions inventories
Area and mobile sources boundary
Point sources boundary
5-37
-------
Table III-5-1; Emission inventory toxic chemicals list
CAS NUMBER1
CHEMICAL
71-
7440-
56-
67-
75-
50-
110-
127-
108-
71-
79-
1330-
108-
95-
106-
•43-2
•43-9
•23-5
•66-3
•09-2
•00-0
54-3
18-4
88-3
55-6
01-6
20-7
38-3
47-6
42-3
Benzene2
Cadmium & compounds2
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Dichloromethane2 (Methylene chloride)
Formaldehyde2
n-Hexane
Tetrachloroethylene2 (Perchloroethylene)
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Xylene, mixed isomers
2j-Xylene
o-Xylene
E-Xylene
1 CAS - Chemical Abstracts Service Registry Number.
2 Substances for which source strengths are graphically
presented through mapping.
5-38
-------
-T
A M ^
1
171-
--- ,- | ----- 1 ---
ll
$30°
3 4 5.6 7 8 9 10. 11 i2 13 14 1 5 ,16 17 13 19 20 2i 22 23 24 25 26
550"
540
560"
Figure III-5-2. Area and Mobile Source Grid Cell Map
(showing UTM-easting and UTM-northing
coord inates) .
5-39
-------
Tobto Ill-S-i: OwBlcolt oddrcuod for Mch cttefory ef th* Million* Inventory
ChOBlcol
L^__^__
ovTuono
carton tttrachlorM*
trlcMoroMtfcano
dlcMoraoithm
tctridilermiltrlcn*
t«twn«
l.t.l-trlcMvTMtfcm
trldi\»r«*t)iyt«v
Wl«IM
l-«»l«nt
Ciyltnt
B-«y4««
IHMMM
eaAilia 1 eopowdl
lonMl*b|4>
Hebll*
Source*
Mabtlt
tourcn
I
•
1
I
I
*rn ta
ft
KTUl
I
I
I
1
I
X
•
I
uret* lr«
tnt Sourc
Lint-
Mill
II
M
it*d M
Ml.
ttettt
R
1
X
I
I
Point
Paint
Saurcn
1
I
II
•
I
•
•
•
•
X
K
*
•
•
•
Am
rtfld.
011
Hcttlnt
•
K
Aretilt.
coating
•
I
A I f A
Auto
•(finish
1
I
Cold
deorntlnt
R
I
1
•
R
R
R
Art* uood
hMlIng
R
Contuwr
•olvent
iat
I
Ory
Cl*onli«
I
BMOtlm
dlitrlbutlan
t retail
X
R
R
5-40
-------
Staten Island/New Jersey Urban Air Toxics Assessment Project
Benzene
Cadmium & compounds
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Formaldehyde
n-Hexane
Perchloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Xylene (all isomers)
6.015
0
Tons per Year (Thousands)
Figure III-5-3. Annual air toxics emissions from evaluated source categories (for years 1986 - 1988).
5-41
-------
Staten Island/New Jersey Urban Air Toxics Assessment Project
Percent Contribution to Air Toxics Emissions Inventory
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Benzene
Cadmium Dichloromethane
& compounds
Formaldehyde Perchloroethylene
Point
Source Category
Mobile
Figure III-5-4. Source category contributions to the air toxics emissions inventory.
5-42
-------
Table IH-5-3; Summary of source category contributions to the air toxics emission inventory
(Estimated air emissions in tons per year, tpy)
1,1,1-
Cacbon Dichloro- Perchloro- Trichloro- Trichloro- Xylene
Benzene Cadmium Tetrachloride Chloroform methane Formaldehyde n-Hexane ethylene Toluene ethane ethylene (all isomers)
AREA SOURCES2
X of total
MOBILE SOURCES2
% of total
POINT SOURCES4
X of total
79.75
(5.5X)
1,281.89
(88. IX)
93.08
(6.4X)
0.42
(7.0X)
0.00
(O.OX)
5.56
(93. OX)
0.00
(O.OX)
0.00
(O.OX)
469.73
(100. OX)
0.00
(O.OX)
0.00
(O.OX)
25.22
(100. OX)
72.77
(9.0X)
0.00
(O.OX)
734.58
(91. OX)
65.38
(12. OX)
412.58
(75. 1X)
70.76
(12. 9X)
NA3 789.52
(65. 7X)
317.55 0.00
(29.4X) (O.OX)
779.27 411.80
(71. OX) (34.3X)
492.03
(8.2X)
1,757.48
(29.2X)
3,765.20
(62.6X)
260.14
(28.5X)
0.00
(O.OX)
653.00
(71. 5X)
79.14
(19.6X)
0.00
(O.OX)
323.86
(80.1X)
503.65
(14. OX)
1,961.87
(54.8X)
1,112.51
(31. IX)
TOTAL TPY 1,454.72 5.98 469.73 25.22 807.35 548.72 1,096.82 1,201.32 6,014.71 913.14 403.00 3,578.03
1 "Xylene (all isomers)" includes xylene (nixed isomers) (CAS* 1330-20-7), m-xylene (CAS* 108-38-3), o-xylene (CAS* 95-47-6). and g-xylene (CAS* 106-42-3).
2 Table III-5-19.
3 "MA" means data were not available.
4 Tables 111-5-4 through 111-5-18.
-------
6. SOURCE IDENTIFICATION
6.1 INTRODUCTION
Measured air quality data at the monitoring sites were
related to potential local sources or more remote upwind
locations through the use of meteorological data. Meteorological
models were applied in order to achieve this goal of source
identification.
A methodology was developed which used a pollutant rose
model and a surface trajectory model. The pollutant rose model
was used in assessing long-term air toxics transport patterns,
while the surface trajectory model was used to evaluate short-
term or episodic periods.
Preliminary modeling studies were performed using the
pollutant^ rose and back trajectory techniques on volatile organic
compound (VOC) data from the project. These studies were used as
a basis for further work which focused more on source
identification through the use of emission inventories.
The enhanced pollutant rose analysis focused on
the same volatile organic species as the preliminary work, but
expanded the site base to include more sampling locations
throughout Staten Island and nearby New Jersey. The surface
trajectory analysis was expanded as well; specific pollutants
were considered, and potential source area-receptor relationships
were identified.
The outputs generated by the pollutant rose and surface
trajectory models were reflective of the quality of the pollutant
and meteorological data used as inputs. Errors or problems with
these data affect the validity of pollutant rose and surface
trajectory results.
6.2 POLLUTANT ROSE ANALYSIS DESCRIPTION
6.2.1 Pollutant Rose Model
Data inputs to the pollutant rose model consisted of air
quality data and wind direction data for the period October 1987
through September 1989. The air quality data represented 24-hour
average concentrations for the pollutant sampled on an every-
6-1
-------
sixth-day basis. For these sampling periods, 24-hour resultant
concentration vectors were calculated using wind direction data
reduced to the eight compass point classification system: N, NE,
E, SE, S, SW, W, NW. Wind direction data were obtained from
Newark International Airport.
These vector values were put into a LOTUS 1-2-3 spreadsheet
prepared to perform the required calculations. Results of the
spreadsheet calculations were imported to a GRAPHWRITER
horizontal bar chart, and printed.
The pollutant rose model was designed to accept wind
direction data representative of a three-hour average wind
direction vector. Eight such values per 24-hour period are used
and matched with the 24-hour concentrations. This introduces a
source of error into the calculations: pairing a 24-hour
concentration with eight different wind direction vectors, each
representing a specific three-hour time interval. Instead, a 24-
hour wind direction vector was computed (in essence using a
constant-direction wind for the entire 24 hours) and used in
conjunction with the observed 24-hour site concentration; this
method was regarded as more consistent with the 24-hour average
concept. Individual errors or inconsistencies should be smoothed
out as the number of data points increases. Accordingly, output
obtained using two years of data as input, as opposed to six
months or one year of data, was regarded as more reliable.
6.2.2 Selection of Sites and Pollutants
The criteria for selection of data sets for the development
of pollution rose methodology were as follows:
The site and pollutant should be representative of a
more general set for the project.
The sites generally should provide spatial coverage of
the entire study area.
Meteorological data should be appropriate for each
site.
The pollutant should have a full data set for each site
selected.
Pollutants should be selected from each of the aromatic
and the chlorinated hydrocarbon groups of VOCs.
The following additional criterion was used in selecting
candidates for the enhanced pollutant rose analysis:
6-2
-------
Such sites/pollutants combinations that were repeatedly
among the highest three or four in the site-concentration rank
order tables of annual averages for each chemical (Tables III-3-
28 through 48).
The results of the initial pollutant rose analyses, which
concentrated primarily on relationships between pollutant and
meteorological data, are described in the appendix of this
volume. The results of the enhanced pollutant rose analyses,
which focused more on source identification, are described below.
6.3 SOURCE IDENTIFICATION USING POLLUTANT ROSE ANALYSIS
Site concentration rank order tables from Section 3 of this
volume were examined. Project sites that were repeatedly in the
highest three or four in concentration year by year for VOC data
were identified. Pollutant roses were prepared for these sites
and pollutants with the goal of developing associations between
the site concentrations and source areas of the pollutants
(source-receptor relationships). The following are the sites and
pollutants chosen as subjects for this portion of the pollutant
rose analysis.
Pollutant
rose
Pollutant
benzene (year 1)
benzene (year 2)
toluene (year 1)
toluene (year 2)
trichloroethane
dichloromethane
chloroform
carbon tetrachloride
Sites
Dongan Hills
Elizabeth
Port Richmond
Eltingville
Carteret
Bayley Seton
same as "A11
same as "A"
same as "A"
Port Richmond
Elizabeth
Carteret
Seuaren
Dongan Hills
Port Richmond
Travis
Port Richmond
Travis
Elizabeth
Carteret
Tottenville
Seuaren
6-3
-------
I trichloroethylene Port Richmond
Travis
Elizabeth
Carteret
The roses for individual sites are depicted as bar charts found
in the appendix of this volume; these charts include information
on concentrations and number of observations for each of the
eight compass directions. The roses designated Roses A through I
are maps depicting individual roses for multiple sites. Only
Roses A, C, F, and I are discussed below; the others are in the
appendix of this volume.
Each pollutant rose was examined and those wind directions
with discernible concentration peaks were considered for analysis
using the emission inventories. A peak concentration direction
was generally defined as a wind direction associated with a
concentration value 25% or higher than the next highest ranked
wind direction. For example, if a pollutant rose contains a
northeast petal with concentration of 1.30 ppb and the next
highest concentration is only 1.00 ppb, then northeast is to be
considered a peak concentration direction since 1.30 is more than
25% higher than 1.00.
The sector of interest—that portion of the study area
located within the peak concentration direction sector—was
identified. For example, if the peak concentration direction is
northeast, then the sector of interest would be to the northeast
of the monitor (approximately 22-68 compass degrees clockwise
from the north) and extending to the perimeter of the study area.
The project emission inventory was then examined for sources
located within the sector of interest.
The three parts of the project emission inventory — the
microinventory, point source inventory, and mobile/area source
mapping inventory — provide information in different terms. The
microinventory is comprised of point and area sources located
within one kilometer of a monitoring site; total, not specified,
VOC emission data in tons per year (tpy) are listed. The point
source inventory includes point sources farther away but capable
of affecting the monitors in the project area; this listing is in
tpy on a pollutant-by-pollutant basis. The mobile/area source
mapping inventory lists emissions pollutant-by-pollutant in tpy
densities based on 2 x 2-km square areas.
Sources in the inventory are described in terms of the
relative magnitudes of their potential impacts on the monitors.
This is identified as relative source impact (R.S.I.). A
dispersion model was used to compute impacts using assumed source
and meteorological parameters and different combinations of wind
speeds and atmospheric stabilities. The equation of best fit
6-4
-------
(with concentration and distance to receptor as the variables)
for the resulting data was identified.
Relative source strengths were computed by using emission
rates of the sources and the equation of best fit. The actual
numbers provided for R.S.I, are dimensionless; they are used as a
basis for evaluating relative source contributions to monitored
concentrations.
Four of the nine enhanced pollutant rose analyses are
presented below. These are Rose A (benzene, year 1}, Rose C
(toluene, year 1), Rose P (dichloromethane), and Rose I
(trichloroethylene). These four were selected because they were
representatives of (a) pollutants of the aromatic (benzene,
toluene) and chlorinated (dichloromethane, trichloroethylene)
subgroups, and (b) pollutants associated with pronounced
pollutant concentration/wind direction relationships. These four
roses are presented as Maps III-6-2 through 5. The five
additional pollutant rose analyses are presented in the appendix
of this volume.
6.3.1 Pollutant Rose A - Benzene. Year 1
(Map III-6-2)
An inspection of this rose associates low concentrations
with southeasterly winds, except at the Elizabeth monitoring
site. In general, this wind direction indicates an over-water
trajectory; there are no major sources of benzene in Lower New
York Bay and Raritan Bay.
6.3.1.1 Elizabeth, south/southeast sector
The Elizabeth pollutant rose associates south and southeast
winds with the highest benzene concentrations (2.02 ppb and 2.11
ppb, respectively). Only those emission inventory sources
located in a sector to the south and southeast of the Elizabeth
monitor were included.
The microinventory sources for this sector include the Exxon
Bayway refinery, NJDOT Bayway Center, Reichold Chemical Corp.,
Crown Petroleum, and The Elizabethtown Gas Production Plant.
From the point source inventory for benzene in this sector
are the following:
6-5
-------
Source Emissions Distance R.S.I.
tpy km
Exxon Bayway Refinery 25.00 2.1 16.44
Merck and Company 8.45 6.5 2.93
Amerada Hess and Company 2.9 10.5 0.77
The benzene mobile/area source emission density map1 shows
a high emission density, >20-25 tpy, to the southeast of
Elizabeth, particularly in the vicinity of the Goethals Bridge.
This analysis indicates that the principal contributors to
the high concentrations of benzene in the vicinity of the
Elizabeth monitor were the Exxon refinery and mobile sources.
6.3.1.2 Eltingville, north sector
North winds at Eltingville were associated with benzene
concentrations nearly two tiroes higher than the next highest wind
direction (3.05 ppb versus 1.66 ppb, with a west wind). The
benzene mobile/area source emission density map indicates highest
densities, 30 tpy, in the corridor north of the Eltingville
monitor. Richmond Parkway is quite close to the monitoring site,
with several highway intersections nearby. This fact, coupled
with a lack of benzene point sources (the closest in the point
source inventory is a POTW in South Brooklyn, <1 tpy), implicates
mobile/area sources as the chief contributors to the high
concentrations.
6.3.1.3 Implication of mobile sources as sources of high
concentrations at the Elizabeth and Eltingville
monitors
An inspection of Rose A indicates that the peak directions
of south/southeast for Elizabeth and north for Eltingville point
to the same general source area for emissions of benzene. The
absence of point sources in this common area, the large
mobile/area source densities, and the greater contribution of
mobile than area sources to those densities implicate mobile
sources as primary contributors to the high measured benzene
concentrations. Another example of the domination of mobile
sources on benzene impact is observed with the Carteret and
Elizabeth portions of Rose A. A group of point sources is
Figure III-5-22 was the map used; mobile source emissions
were VMT-based for Staten Island, population-based for New
Jersey. The VMT-based estimates were regarded as better for
source identification; however, the difference in estimation
method leaves New Jersey mobile sources appearing less
influential than Staten Island mobile sources.
6-6
-------
situated in a north-south orientation between Elizabeth and
Carteret. While the south segment of the Elizabeth rose is
large, the north segment of the Carteret rose is not; from the
perspective of relative source impact, this suggests that sources
close to the Elizabeth monitor have the greatest effect. Since
the southeast segment of the rose for Elizabeth represents the
largest concentration and points toward the Goethals Bridge and
Staten Island Expressway, the implication is that mobile sources
are responsible for most of the benzene impact at the monitor.
6.3.2 Pollutant Rose C - Toluene. Year 1
(Map III-6-3)
6.3.2.1 Eltingville, north sector
The relationship between high concentration (9.02 ppb) and
north wind at Eltingville that was observed for year 1 benzene is
repeated here for year 1 toluene. The only toluene point source
in the emission inventory that might affect the monitor is the
Oakwood Beach POTW; but its location east of the monitor and
toluene emissions of only 0.22 tpy suggest that it does not play
a role in explaining the high concentrations observed at
Eltingville. Using the benzene mobile/area source emission
density map2 to estimate the toluene mobile/area source
emissions yields a density as high as 50 tpy for this sector.3
Thus, mobile/area sources are implicated as the major
contributors to toluene impact at this monitor.
6.3.2.2 Carteret, southwest sector
Peak toluene concentrations (5.43 ppb) at Carteret were
associated with southwest winds. Based on the mapped benzene
mobile/area source emissions estimate of 9 tpy, toluene
mobile/area source emissions are estimated at 15 tpy. Three
sources were located in the emission inventory: Carteret Bus
Service/Gas Station, Anchor Abrasives Corp. (sand-blasting)—
2 See footnote 1.
3 The contributions to the toluene per capita emission factor
are 0.690 Ibs/person/year from area sources, and 2.466
Ibs/person/yr from mobile sources; and for benzene, 0.1126
and 1.799 Ib/person/yr, respectively. Thus, the toluene
mobile/area source emissions are estimated at 1.65 times
the mapped benzene mobile/area source emissions. The
mobile source emissions account for 78% of the toluene
mobile/area source emissions, and 94% of the benzene
mobile/area source emissions.
6-7
-------
three times more distant from the monitor than Carteret Bus
Service/Gas Station in a north-south alignment—and GATX
Terminals. The toluene emissions listed for GATX Terminals is
2.19 tpy; emissions estimates were not available for the other
two sources listed in the microinventory.
GATX Terminals is as far north of the monitor as Anchor
Abrasives is south, but there is no elevation in concentration
associated with north winds at Carteret. This indicates that
point sources are not the principal cause of the high
concentrations at Carteret. The more likely cause for high
concentrations on southwesterly winds at this monitor is
vehicular emissions from the New Jersey Turnpike, approximately
two kilometers away to the west and southwest.
6.3.3 Pollutant Rose F - Dichloromethane
(Map III-6-4)
The concentrations of dichloromethane at Port Richmond on
northeast winds were nearly twice the concentration of the next
highest direction (2.09 ppb versus 1.11 ppb for north winds). At
the Travis monitor, north, northeast, and south winds were
associated with high concentrations; no sector was prominent.
The northeast wind peak at Port Richmond was investigated
using the micro, point source, and mobile/area source mapping
inventories.
In the microinventory there is a large cluster of sources to
the northeast of the monitor. Most notable are the Port Richmond
POTW and Antique Brass Works. The latter source is probably
insignificant, but it is located only one block northeast of the
monitor. The cluster also includes several auto refinishing
facilities, but the inventory does not contain any emissions data
for these sources.
The point source inventory for dichloromethane lists the
following sources in the northeast sector:
Source Emissions Distance R.S.I.
(tpy)
Newtown Creek POTU 68.88 18.1 13.40
City of Bayonne POTU 4.18 2.5 2.49
Emissions density for dichloromethane to the northeast of
the monitor is shown as zero in the area/mobile source mapping
inventory. Emission densities for the entire region are
generally less than 0.5 tpy; thus point sources and not
mobile/area sources are primary contributors to dichloromethane
impacts at the monitors.
6-8
-------
The primary sources of dichloromethane likely to have caused
the high concentrations at the Port Richmond monitor during
northeast winds are POTWs.
6.3.4 Pollutant Rose I - Trichloroethvlene
(Map III-6-5)
Concentration peaks are very well defined at two of the four
sites considered in this pollutant rose. The concentrations on
north and northeast winds (0.27 and 0.28 ppb, respectively) at
Travis were associated with trichloroethylene concentrations
three times higher than the next highest concentration-direction
(0.09 ppb with west winds). At Port Richmond, a striking
northeast peak appeared (as occurred with some of the other
chlorinated compounds); it was nearly four times the value of the
next high concentration-direction (0.42 ppb versus 0.12 ppb, with
north winds).
6.3.4.1 Travis, north/northeast sectors
Trichloroethylene sources to the north and northeast of
Travis were investigated using the micro and point source
inventories.
In the microinventory, there is a dry cleaning
establishment, an auto refinishing shop, and a concrete/asphalt
plant within 1 km of the monitor. Quantified emissions from
these sources are either zero or not available.
The point source inventory for trichloroethylene lists the
following in the north/northeast sector:
Source Emissions Distance R.S.I.
-------
impact, since trichloroethylene is used as a solvent/degreaser at
such businesses; but without quantifiable emissions data, the
connection with high concentrations at the monitor cannot be
verified.
6.3.4.2 Port Richmond, northeast sector
In the microinventory, there is a large cluster of sources
to the northeast of the monitor, most notably the Port Richmond
POTW and Antique Brass Works. The microinventory also contains
several auto refinishing shops, but emissions data are
unavailable.
The point source inventory for trichloroethylene lists the
following in the northeast sector:
Source Emissions Distance R.S.I.
(tpy) (km)
Gordon Term Svce. Co. 9.67 2.9 5.30
PO Oil & Chem. Storage 7.97 3.0 4.28
Newtown Creek POTW 7.55 16.5 1.55
Red Hook POTU 1.14 14.1 0.26
26 Ward POTW 0.72 20.3 0.13
Port Richmond POTW 0.13 1.2 0.11
Industrial/chemical sources of trichloroethylene appear to
have caused the high concentrations at the Port Richmond monitor.
POTWs are represented, but the lower emission rates are much
lower and/or are they are located much farther from the monitor.
6.4 SURFACE TRAJECTORY ANALYSES DESCRIPTION
6.4.1 Surface Trajectory Model
A surface trajectory model was used to depict movement of
atmospheric packets or parcels of air backward in time given a
parcel terminal point. This trajectory model is intended to
identify source areas of toxic air pollutants with the goal of
relating specific source areas to pollutant concentrations at
established receptor locations. This is accomplished by using
surface wind speeds and directions from several nearby
meteorological stations.
Due to the uncertainty regarding whether or not surface
winds are representative of meteorological conditions aloft
during the nighttime, the results presented should be thought of
as more general air trajectories relating concentrations with
source areas rather than particular point sources. However, due
6-10
-------
to the relatively small area analyzed, horizontal and not
vertical transport is most likely to be the controlling factor.
Thus, this model is regarded as appropriate for the intended
level of analysis.
The surface trajectory model is a LOTUS spreadsheet which
computes the movement of air parcels given inputs such as UTM
coordinates for the parcel terminal point, UTM coordinates for
the meteorological stations, and wind speed and direction data to
match the hours of the trajectory. Then computations of the
movement of parcel location with time were made, and the UTM
coordinates of parcel location were entered into the results
section. The table of results was then imported to a FREELANCE
grid map of the project area, and the parcel positions and
movement were depicted graphically.
6.4.2 Selection of sites, pollutants, and dates
The initial surface trajectory analysis consisted of six
trajectories, selected on a general basis of aromatic/chlorinated
hydrocarbon concentration variations and air stagnation periods.
These initial trajectories were analyzed more from a
meteorological perspective than for purposes of source
identification. The results of these analyses are described in
the appendix of this volume.
6.5 SOURCE IDENTIFICATION USING SURFACE TRAJECTORY
ANALYSIS
6.5,1 Introduction
The surface trajectory analysis presented here includes an
examination of both aromatic and chlorinated hydrocarbons.
Benzene and toluene (aromatic compounds) were chosen as potential
tracers for automotive sources and refineries; chloroform and
carbon tetrachloride (chlorinated compounds), as potential
tracers for chemical/industrial plants; and tetrachloroethylene,
as a known tracer for sewage treatment plants and dry cleaners.
All of the project sites were considered in the selection
process. Those sites which exhibited very high concentrations of
the pollutant of interest on one or more occasions were chosen,
and trajectories were run for the dates In question. This
resulted in the generation of more than 25 surface trajectories.
Fourteen trajectories are discussed below—10 for
6-11
-------
tetrachloroethylene, three for benzene and toluene, and one for
chloroform and carbon tetrachloride; they are Maps III-6-6
through 20.
6.5.2 Chloroform and Carbon Tetrachloride
(Map III-6-6)
Concentrations of chloroform were high at Port Richmond,
Travis, and the Pump Station on March 11-12, 1989; additionally,
concentrations of carbon tetrachloride were high at Tottenyille.
The gentle southwest to southeast trajectory covers a portion of
the Fresh Kills Landfill before arriving at the monitoring site.
A source-receptor relationship for Akzo Chemicals and high
concentrations is exhibited for chloroform; while it is suspected
that the landfill may contribute to these concentrations, the
absence of landfill emissions data for chloroform in the emission
inventory render relative contributions of the chemical plant and
the landfill difficult to assess. In the point source inventory
for chloroform, only Akzo Chemicals had emissions greater than 1
tpy in the south/southeast sector; located 21.4 km from the Pump
Station monitor, its chloroform emissions are listed as 2.75 tpy.
Although the Port Richmond POTW estimated emissions are 0.39 tpy,
its short distance from the Port Richmond monitor (1.2 km)
identifies it as a potential contributor to the high
concentration at Port Richmond.
In the point source inventory for carbon tetrachloride for
this sector, only Hercules, Inc., had emissions greater than I
tpy; located 11.0 km from the Tottenville monitor, its carbon
tetrachloride emissions are listed as 447.74 tpy—an order of
magnitude higher than the next-highest ranked source for the
entire emissions inventory. A source-receptor relationship
between the Hercules facility and the Tottenville monitor is
indicated.
6.5.3 Toluene and Benzene
6.5.3.1 High concentrations of toluene and benzene
(Map III-6-7)
The maximum concentration of toluene (25.15 ppb) for the
entire project was recorded at the Eltingville monitor on October
15-16, 1987; the benzene concentration was very high (7.25 ppb),
as well. Segments of the trajectory all fit into a relatively
narrow 45-degree sector stretching from north-northeast to north-
northwest of the monitoring site. The micro, point source,
6-12
-------
and mobile/area source (for benzene only) inventories were
examined to locate sources within this sector.
Sources in the microinventory include the Fresh Kills
Landfill and two dry cleaners, but no quantified emissions; and a
gas station with emissions of 1.74 tpy total VOCs.
The point source inventory for benzene lists the following
in the 45-degree sector with emissions greater than 1 tpy:
Source Emissions Distance R.S.I.
(tpy) (km)
Exxon Bayway Refinery 25.00 8.4 7.51
Orbis Products. Corp. 13.14 14.4 2.91
Huls America, Inc. 5.09 12.3 1.23
Troy Chemical Co. 1.31 17.7 0.26
Spencer Kellogg Prod. 1.10 18.9 0.21
The point source inventory for toluene lists the following
in the 45-degree sector with emissions greater than 40 tpy:
Source Emissions Distance R.S.I.
(tpy) (km)
Radel Leather Co. 519.25 23.7 86.77
General Motors Corp. CPC 107.10 9.5 30.00
Seton Co./Radel Tanning 111.88 23.7 18.70
Exxon Bayway Refinery 50.00 8.4 15.02
Ashland Chemical 61.89 19.0 11.72
CUC Industries, Inc. 47.10 19.1 8.89
The mobile/area source mapping inventory for benzene
indicates emissions of benzene in the 10-20 tpy range due north
of the monitor, with a few pockets of 20-30 tpy emissions 2 to 10
km northeast and northwest of the monitor. These values are
comparable, in magnitude and distance from the monitor, with
those found in the point source inventory.
The refinery and mobile sources each contribute to the
benzene impact at the Eltingville monitor. The greater area of
20-30 tpy emissions as compared to comparable point source
emissions suggests mobile sources as the primary contributors to
monitored benzene impacts.
Using the benzene mobile/area source emission density map to
estimate the toluene mobile/area source emissions yields a
density as high as 50 tpy for this sector. Thus, for toluene, a
mix of industrial, refinery, and mobile sources is implicated.
The next two trajectories are presented for comparison; they
are days of low benzene and low toluene concentrations at the
Eltingville monitor.
6-13
-------
6.5.3.2 Low benzene concentration
(Map III-6-8)
Trajectory segments for this low benzene concentration day,
August 4-5, 1988, are predominantly from the south/southwest,
south, and southeast. This is in direct opposition to the high
benzene trajectory, which featured northwest through northeast
trajectory segments. The Bayway Refinery's connection with the
high benzene concentrations discussed in section 6.5.3.1 is
indicated here, since none of the trajectory segments for this
low day pass anywhere near that refinery.
6.5.3.3 Low toluene concentration
(Map III-6-9)
The trajectory for this day, October 9-10, 1988, when
toluene concentrations were low is well-channeled from the
southwesterly direction, passing directly over Perth Amboy, New
Jersey. As in the case of the benzene analysis presented above,
this trajectory bears no resemblance to the one for high toluene.
This trajectory is from a completely different direction; like
the trajectory for the low benzene day, it does not sweep over
the Bayway Refinery. The point source inventory contains only
two sources of toluene greater than 20 tpy in the southwest
sector: Hercules, Inc., and National Metallizing. These sources
are quite remote with respect to the Eltingville monitor, the
sources being located.18.8 and 35.3 km away, respectively.
6.5.4 Tetrachloroethylene
(Maps III-6-10 through 20)
The example of tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene, PCE),
with higher annual average concentrations than those reported for
14 other urban areas in the 1989 Urban Air Toxics Monitoring
Project (UATMP) study, demonstrates how the source identification
conclusion can vary when a limited analysis is used. This is a
direct consequence of this source identification's dependence on
the meteorology of the given day and on an emission inventory of
annual averages not reflecting daily or peak emissions activity
of the sources covered.
Surface trajectories were generated for three sets of dates,
and used for source identification. The Pump Station, Carteret,
and Travis monitors were selected based on the following
criteria: location of monitors, quantity of quality-assured data,
and sampling location where high PCE concentrations were
observed. Carteret is regarded as representative of conditions
in the industrial corridor of northeastern New Jersey; and Travis
and the Richmond Road Pump Station, as representative of Staten
6-14
-------
Island. At least one year of valid FCE data were available for
all three sites. The Pump Station satisfies the third criterion;
PCE concentrations recorded there were among the highest anywhere
in the project area.
6.5.4.1 Part A: high vs. low concentrations selection of dates
(Maps III-6-10 through 13)
The trajectory associated with high concentrations of PCE at
all sites is from northeast to southeast (July 21-22,1989; Map
III-6-10). The emissions inventory revealed that the largest
emitters for all PCE sources northeast through southeast of the
three-site monitor cluster were the following, all located in
Brooklyn: Acme Steel Co. at 33.95 tons/year, northeast of the
monitors; the Newtown Creek POTW at 7,70 tpy, also northeast of
the monitors; and the Coney Island POTW at 5.92 tpy, east of the
monitor cluster. It is reasonable to assume that, on this day at
least, the high concentrations of PCE at the monitors were caused
primarily by these sources.
The surface trajectory associated with low concentrations of
PCE at all sites is from the west (May 28-29,1989; Map III-6-
11). Meteorology may explain this. Although there are several
sources of PCE to the west of the monitor cluster, westerly
trajectories are often associated with greater air dispersion,
both horizontally and vertically; this could tend to lower
concentrations as the contaminant plume heads into Staten Island.
The hybrid days (June 15-16,1989 and June 21-22,1989; Maps
III-6-12 and 111-6-13}, those days when concentrations were high
at one or two monitors and low at the remaining monitors, showed
no conclusive pattern. Southeast to northeasterly trajectories
were observed on both of these days.
Table 111-6-5; Synopsis of the Part A surface trajectory
analysis for PCE
Dates Pure Station Carteret Travis Trajectory
7/21-22 1989 H H H HE to SE
5/2B-29 1989 L L L V
6/15-16 1989 L H H NE to SE
6/21-22 1989 H L L NE to SE
6.5.4.2 Part B: rank order selection of dates
(Maps III-6-14 through 16)
A different set of high- and low-concentration dates were
selected to test the generalization of the part A source
identification conclusion to other days of high concentration.
6-15
-------
January 4-5, 1989 - Selected as one of the five low
concentration days at both the Pump Station and Travis.
January 16-17, 1989 - Selected as one of the five highest
concentration days at both the Pump Station and Carteret.
January 23-24, 1989 - These dates did not appear on either
list, however 1/22-23 appeared on the high concentration list for
both the Pump station and Travis. Since 1/22-23 was previously
analyzed and was shown to be part of a regional air stagnation
time period, the next day, 1/23-24, 1989, was analyzed instead.
The three surface trajectories are depicted graphically as
Maps III-6-14 through 16. Table III-6-6 below lists each of the
three days along with the relative PCE concentrations and the
prevailing surface trajectory.
Table III-6-6: Synopsis of the part B surface trajectory
analysis for PCE
Dates Pup Station Carteret Travis Trajectory
1/4-5 1989 1L -- 2L NW
1/16-17 1989 4H 5H - U to SU
1/23-24 1989 IN -- 3H M.W.S (Varied)
Key: 1L»first lowest, 2L=second lowest, 4H*fourth highest, etc.
The first trajectory listed in Table III-6-6 is the low
concentration day trajectory (Map III-6-14). The prevalent
trajectory of northwest shows agreement with the Part A analysis,
which associates low PCE levels with west or northwest
traj ectories.
The second trajectory associates relatively high PCE
concentrations at two of the monitors with a west to
southwesterly wind trajectory (Map III-6-15). Note that this
differs from the result in Part A, showing that there is more
than one source area associated with high PCE concentrations.
While these days were not maximum or peak PCE days, the PCE
concentrations were high enough on the list to warrant some
investigation. The emission inventories revealed several sources
of PCE to the west-southwest of the monitor cluster; they are the
POTWs listed below.
6-16
-------
Source Emissions Distance (km) R.S.I.
(tpy) to Puno Station
Middlesex County POTU 23.11 22.2 4.01
Rahuay Valley POTU 8.10 3.6 3.93
Middlesex County,SA POTU 5.81 H.3 1.29
Uoodbridge POTU #1 0.21 8.1 0.06
It is reasonable to conclude that there is a source-receptor
relationship between these POTWs and the monitor cluster.
The final trajectory in this analysis is an air stagnation
period trajectory, as evidenced by the varied trajectory on 1/23-
24, 1989 (Map III-6-16). It is roost likely that the high
concentrations of PCE in the ambient air were not caused by a
single dominating point source, but by a pronounced
meteorological inversion trapping all pollutants near the surface
with resulting very high concentrations throughout the project
area.
6.5.4.3 Part C : peak versus valley selection of dates
(Maps III-6-17 through III-6-20)
High at Travis/low at Carteret. Seven of the eight segments
of the trajectory for this day, Feb. 15-16, 1989 (Trajectory 1,
Map III-6-17), were contained within a sector bounded by
approximately 270 through 005 degrees (west through north).
Sources within this sector were identified using the project
emission inventories.
In the microinventory, three sources are located within the
sector under consideration. These are a rock crusher, a
transfer/recycle facility, and Fresh Kills Landfill. Just beyond
the sector and to the northeast of the monitor are two more
sources: a dry cleaner and an auto refinishing shop.
In the point source inventory the only source in the sector
with emissions greater than 1 tpy is the nearby Rahway Valley
POTW; emissions are 8.10 tpy, location is 1.7 km from the Travis
monitor.
From the mobile/area source mapping inventory for PCE,
emissions within this sector are generally less than 10 tpy per
2-km area, except for the region immediately north and
north/northwest of the monitor, where PCE emissions range up to
15 tpy.
The west to north trajectory tracks over the northern
portion of Fresh Kills Landfill before reaching the Travis
monitor. This, coupled with the very low concentrations observed
across the Arthur Kill at Carteret and the information contained
in the mobile/area source mapping inventory, indicates that the
6-17
-------
area sources—in this case cold-degreasing and dry cleaning—are
a major contributor to the high PCE concentrations measured at
the Travis monitor. Also contributing, although probably to a
lesser extent, is Rahway Valley POTW.
Fourth highest at Travis/third lowest at Carteret, and
second highest at Travis. These trajectories are for February
27-28, 1989 (Trajectory 2, Map III-6-18), and November 30-
December 1, 1988 (Trajectory 3, Map III-6-19), respectively.
They are to be used as a basis for comparison to the Trajectory
1. Trajectory 2 is a day similar to Trajectory 1 in that
concentrations are relatively high at Travis and relatively low
at Carteret. However, the latter trajectory is composed of two
distinct, tight channels— one from the west, the other from the
northeast. Trajectory 3 trajectory features a day of very high
concentrations at Travis; it, too, is composed of two channels—
one from the west, the other from the south—that are not as
tight as the Trajectory 2.
The same sources that have been indicated previously
(several POTWs to the west, and POTWs, Acme Steel and PD
Oil/Chemical Storage to the northeast) are present in this
analysis. The following is a rationalization of the simultaneous
high concentrations at Travis and low concentrations at Carteret.
The Travis impacts are primarily caused by the sources to the
west, in New Jersey. The sources to the west are much closer to
the monitors in question than are the sources to the northeast,
but their emissions are of similar magnitudes. The trajectory in
this scenario is simply from source area to Travis, bypassing
Carteret, which is too far south (compared to Travis) to be
affected much by the POTW sources in New Jersey. The impacts
from the Brooklyn cluster of sources cannot be dismissed since
these sources have been present in other analyses of high
concentration days (and are present on this day), but their
impact is much greater when the trajectories are persistently
from the northeast.
Trajectories 1, 2, and 3 all exhibit a pronounced flow from
the west for a good part of the day.
High Carteret/low Travis. Each segment of the trajectory
for October 30-31, 1988 (Trajectory 4, Map III-6-20) was
contained within a sector roughly 75 degrees in arc bounded by
the north/northeast and northwest.
Five quantifiable VOC sources were located in the micro-
inventory; none of these listed any emissions of
perchloroethylene. Pollutants emitted by the largest sources
within the sector of concern were gasoline, aromatic
hydrocarbons, hexane, and methylene chloride (dichloromethane);
perchloroethylene was not listed. There are three dry cleaning
establishments in the area, but only one is within the sector of
6-18
-------
interest; the inventory does not contain emissions data for that
facility.
In the point source inventory, the Rahway Valley POTW is the
only source located within this sector; emissions are 8.10 tpy,
location is 1.2 km from the monitor.
The mobile/area source mapping inventory indicates a general
area of PCE emissions of 5 to 10 tpy immediately north and
northwest of the Carteret monitor. Emissions are greater (10 to
15 tpy) near the northeastern boundary of the sector. Thus, area
sources (cold degreasing and dry cleaning) are implicated as the
major contributor to the PCE concentrations at Carteret in this
scenario. Subordinate to area sources is a POTW source, which
corroborates a link between perchloroethylene and POTW sources.
Table II1-6-7: Synopsis of the part C surface trajectory
analysis for PCE
Dates Pumo Station Carteret Travis Trajectory
2/15-16 1989 -- L H U to M
2/27-28 1989 -- 3L 4H U and NE
(distinct channels)
11/30 - 12/1 1988 -- -- 2H U and S
(distinct channels)
10/30-31 1988 -- H L NU to NE
6.6 SUMMARY
6.6.1 Pollutant Rose Analysis
The enhanced pollutant rose analysis was performed to
investigate source/receptor relationships (pollutant monitors
functioned as the receptors) by first identifying concentration
peaks and then investigating emission inventories for potential
sources or source areas located upwind of the monitors in
question.
Seven pollutants were examined in the enhanced analysis:
benzene and toluene from the aromatic group, and 1,1,1-
trichloroethane, dichloromethane, chloroform, carbon
tetrachloride, and trichloroethylene from the chlorinated group.
Sites were chosen on the basis of consistently high
concentration of the pollutants of interest. Therefore, some
6-19
-------
pollutant rose maps contain sites that were omitted in other
roses.
6.6.1.1 Aromatics
Both benzene and toluene were consistently traced to mobile
sources, refineries, and, to some extent, nearby gasoline
stations. For toluene, more general industrial sources were
implicated, with some contributions from POTWs and mobile
sources. The areas near the Goethals Bridge and along Route 440/
Richmond Parkway were consistently pointed out as major source
areas of benzene and toluene.
6.6.1.2 Chlorinated hydrocarbons
Sources of chlorinated compounds differed with the
particular chemical; this was unlike the aromatic group of
chemicals, which could be traced to mobile sources and
refineries.
Trichloroethylene and 1,1,1-trichloroethane were
consistently linked with industrial sources and sources such as
auto refinishing shops. This probably arises from the use of
these chemicals as solvents and degreasers.
Chloroform and dichloromethane, on the other hand, were
often traced to POTWs with some contribution from area sources.
Finally, carbon tetrachloride seemed to arise from sources
not contained in any of the other pollutant inventories,
suggesting a very specific manufacturing process or use for this
chemical.
The monitor at Port Richmond exhibited major peaks on
northeast winds for three chlorinated compounds: 1,1,1-
trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, and dichloromethane. It
appears that nearby sources are the major contributors. Auto
refinishers in particular probably contribute most to the impacts
of the first two pollutants; while two nearby POTWs, Port
Richmond and Bayonne, seem to be the primary causes for the high
concentrations of dichloromethane.
6.6.2 Surface Trajectory Analysis
This portion of surface trajectory work included analysis of
four trajectories for days of high concentrations of benzene,
toluene, carbon tetrachloride, and chloroform; and 10
trajectories for high concentrations of perchloroethylene.
6-20
-------
The results for the benzene, toluene, carbon tetrachloride,
and chloroform trajectories corroborated the pollutant rose
findings. Sources identified as contributing most to the high
concentrations of benzene were mobile sources and refineries; the
same was the case for toluene, but with some input from other
industrial sources. Carbon tetrachloride was connected with very
well-defined industrial source types, while concentrations of
chloroform were linked to POTWs. While Fresh Kills Landfill was
suspected as a source of chloroform, the emission inventory did
not contain information to assess its relative contribution to
emissions of this chemical.
For the PCE analysis, most of the dates selected were high
PCE concentration days for one or more monitors. However,
several days that featured low measured concentrations of PCE at
one or more locations were also analyzed for use as a basis for
comparison with trajectories representative of high concentration
days.
Analyses indicated POTWs and several industrial sources as
the primary contributors to PCE impact; while Fresh Kills
Landfill was a suspected source, the emission inventory did not
support it as a source more important than area sources. Several
trajectories indicated northeasterly wind patterns and associated
sources, while others pointed toward sources to the west of
Staten Island, in the New Jersey portion of the study area.
These findings are consistent with those of the pollutant rose
PCE analyses.
6.7 CONCLUSIONS
The pollutant rose ai.d surface trajectory analyses have
attempted to identify sources and source areas of various air
pollutants. Since meteorological conditions often figure
significantly in the ambient impact of these pollutants, it must
not be assumed that the sources and source areas identified in
these analyses cause high concentrations in the study area at all
times, but rather that their effects depend on the meteorological
scenario at the times of measurement.
In keeping with this principle, it must be recognized that
many sources and source areas may have gone undetected in these
analyses due to the variable nature of meteorology and the
limited nature of the air toxics sampling program used for the
project.
The limitations of the emission inventory affect the source
identification results. The following features of the inventory
were of particular importance in assessing relative source
6-21
-------
contributions: (1) the unavailability of emission factors for
chemicals (additional to tetrachloroethylene and toluene)
expected to be emitted from Fresh Kills landfill, (2) the method-
dependence of the mobile source emissions estimates, and (3) the
lack of pollutant-specific emissions for many microinventory
sources closest to the monitors.
These limitations notwithstanding, mobile sources (autos and
trucks) and refineries are the major contributors to the highest
concentrations of benzene and toluene at the project monitors.
POTWs, industrial sources, and area sources are the primary
sources of the highest concentrations of chlorinated hydrocarbons
at the project monitors.
6.8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This section was prepared by Mr. William Barrett, Mr.
Richard Ruvo, Mr. Ray Werner, and Mr. Henry Feingersh of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Region II; with assistance from
Vito Pagnotti of the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation, Ms. Joann Held of the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection and Energy, and Greg Allande of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Region II.
6.8 REFERENCES
Barrett, W. J. (1989) Memorandum: Field visit to Staten
Island/New Jersey Urban Air Toxics Assessment Project
meteorological sites. New York, NY: U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region II.
Bozzelli, J. W.; Kebbekus, B. (1981) Volatile organic compounds
in the ambient atmosphere of the New Jersey, New York area.
Newark, NJ: Air Pollution Research Laboratory, New Jersey
Institute of Technology.
TRC Environmental Consultants, Inc. (1987) Odor impact evaluation
report prepared for Arthur Kill Industrial Business Association.
East Hartford, CT. TRC Project 3276-M31.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1983) Quality assurance
handbook for air pollution measurement systems: volume iv.
meteorological measurements. Research Triangle Park NC: Office
of Research and Development, Environmental Monitoring Systems
Laboratory. EPA report no. EPA-600/4-82-060.
6-22
-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1987a) Ambient
monitoring guidelines for Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD). Washington, DC: Office of Research and Development.
Research Triangle Park NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards. EPA report no. EPA-450/4-87-007.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1987b) On-site
meteorological program guidance for regulatory modeling
applications. Washington, DC: Office of Air and Radiation.
Research Triangle Park NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards. EPA report no. EPA-450/4-87-013.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (1989) Consideration of
transported ozone and precursors and their use in EKMA: Appendix
A: users manual for the trajectory model. Research Triangle Park
NC: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. EPA report no.
EPA-450/4-89-010.
6-23
-------
MAP III - 6-1: KEY TO ROSE MAPS
6-24
-------
MAP III - 6-2: ROSE A, BENZENE YEAR 1
A* AMM0A HESS
i- OQ«M UTUAT WFfWlt
SNCU OIL 00.
ttLLOCC PKOOUCT!
caw.
6-25
-------
MAP III - 6-3: ROSE C, TOLUENE YEAR 1
6-26
-------
MAP III - 6-4: ROSE F, DICHLOROMETHANE
SIOIM. amr.
CITY Of IATONMC MTU
CITY Of ELIZAICTN TOTU
CITT or HOMO* POTU
fiCNOUL NOTOHS CORP.
CPC urour
POTU
L0> CHEMICAU-IU INC.
LIWM/KWLU MTU
MIICX AW CO.
NfUUUC IIOMniM. 9CATIIM. IK.
TtTLET. INC.
TCUN OF KEMWT MTU
UMIOM OIL CO. 0V CM.1
WILSM IMMIIAL CO.
Z4TH UMD POTU
COHfT ISLJUO Mill
OUIS KtAO POTU
ana rani
PT. iicwoa MTU
6-27
-------
MAP III - 6-5: ROSE I, TRICHLOROETHYLENE
HUDSON TOOL I DIE
Essex/union POTU
FT. RICHMOND POTU
NCUTOUN CREEK POTU
COMMW TEKNIHAL SVCE.
UNOEH/WSEUE OOTU
MIDDLESEX POTU »1
PEERLESS TUU CO.
P.O. OIL/CHEMICAL STORAGE
**NUAT VAILET SA POTU
UflC*A*T CHEMICAL/
CU1S ADHESIVE
CONCT ISLAND POTU
•ED HOOK POTU
6-28
-------
MAP III-6-6
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 3/11 - 12/89
Ending Point: Richmond Rd. Pump Station
4.534
54O
550
560
570
580
590
600
610
utm-eastmg
620
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
- O
3 PM-6 PM
D
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
MET DATA FROM STATIONS
-------
MAP III-6-7
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 10/15-16/87
Ending Point: Richmond Rd. Pump Station
MO 670 MO fiOO 800 010 820
utm-easting
9 AM- 12 NOON
12NOON-3PM
O
3PM 6PM
D
6 PM-9 PM
-A-
9PM- 12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
--•-•
3 AM 6 AM
6AM-9AM
MET DATA FROM STATIONS #1-5
-------
I
MAP III-6-8
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 8/04 - 05/88
Ending Point: Richmond Rd. Pump Station
4.53(
540
550
560
570
580
590
600
610
utm — easting
MET DATA FROM STATIONS #1-7
620
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
........ O
3 PM-6 PM
a
6 PM-9 PM
...A-
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
--•--
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
-------
T
hd
MAP IIT-g-o
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 10/09 - 10/88
Ending Point: Richmond Rd. Pump Station
4.531
540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620
utm —easting
MET DATA STATION #1-5
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
0
3 PM-6 PM
a
6 PM-9 PM
..A—
9 PM-12 MID
\Z MID-3 AM
-•--
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
—*—
-------
=r
^
MAP III-6-10
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 7/21-22/89
Ending Point: Susan Wagner High School
4.53
"\ Staftpislanrf -A
540 550 560 570 580 59O 600 610 620
utm-easting
MET DATA FROM STATIONS #1-5
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
--O-
3 PM-6 PM
a
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
-------
MAP III-6-11
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 5/28-29/89
\
v Ending Point: Susan Wagner High School
4.534
540
590
550 560 570 560
utm-easting
MET DATA FROM STATIONS #1-5. 7
600 610
620
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
3 PM-6 PM
a
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
-------
III-6-12
3-
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 6/15-16/89
4.5*
Ending Point: Susan Wagner High School
540
550
560
570
580
590
600
610
utm-easting
MET DATA FROM STATIONS 01-5. 7
620
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
3 PM-6 PM
D
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
—*—
-------
wJ
3-
MAP III-6-13
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 6/21-22/89
Ending Point: Susan Wagner High School
4.53i
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
--O-
3 PM-6 PM
D
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
-••••-
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
540 550 560 570 560 590 600 610 620
utm-easting
MET DATA FROM STATIONS f 1-5. 7
-------
UJ
~-
MAP III-6-14
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 1/4-5/89
\ Ending Point: Richmond Rd. Pump Station
A \
540
550
560
570
580
590
600
610
utm— easting
620
9 AM-12 NOON
—*-
12 NOON-3 PM
•-O -
3 PM-6 PM
a
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
MET DATA FROM STATIONS
-------
I
MAP III-6-15
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 1/16-17/89
Ending Point: Richmond Rd. Pump Station
4.53*
540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620
utm —easting
MET DATA FROM STATIONS 1-7
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
-O -
3 PM-6 PM
D
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
-------
MAP III-6-16
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 1/23-24/89
Ending Point: Richmond Rd. Pump Station
540
550
560
570
580
590
6OO
610
utm-easting
MET DATA FROM STATIONS f 1-7
62O
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
3 PM-6 PM
-D
6 PM-9 PM
...A-
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
^^ _
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
-------
MAP III-6-17
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT ..- 2/15-16/89
Ending Point: ^usan Wagner High School,
4.53*
540 550 560 570 560 59O 600 610 620
utm-easting
MET DATA FROM STATIONS f 1-7
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
— -O—
3 PM-6 PM
a
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
-------
I
MAP III-6-18
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 2/27-28/89
Ending Point: Travis SI, PS 26
4.534
540
550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620
utm —easting
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
O
3 PM-6 PM
D
6 PM-9 PM
...A--
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
--•--
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
MET DATA FROM STATIONS #1-7
-------
MAP III-6-19
c-
E
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 11/30/88-12/01/88
Ending Point: Susan Wagner High School
4.53(
5«0 550
560
570 580 5SO 600 610 620
utm—easting
9 AM- 12 NOON
-*-
12 NOON-3 PM
o
3 PM-6 PM
D
6 PM-9 PM
...A-
9 PM-12 MID
12-MID-3 AM
--•--
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
MET DATA FROM STATIONS
-------
wJ
MAP III-6-20
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 10/30-31/08
Ending Point: Susan Wagner High School
4.53
540
550
570
580
590
UJU
LIO
utm — easting
620
9 AM-12 NOON
\2 NOON-3 PM
O
3 PM-6 PM
D
6 PM-9 PM
...A-
9 PM-12 MID
\2 MID-3 AM
-•--
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
MET DATA FROM STATIONS
-------
APPENDICES FOR VOLUME III, PART A
A-l
-------
DATA MANAGEMENT APPENDICES
A-2
-------
TABLES OF QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL AVERAGES
TABLES III-3-7 - III-3-27
A-3
-------
Table 111-3-7
DICHLOROMETHANE - CH2C12 (HETNYLENE CHLORIDE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF
* SAMPLES
B
A
C
0
1 13
2 10
5 13
7
4
9
8
3
6
ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SAMPLES
-------
Table III-3-8
TRICLOROMETHANE - CHC13 (CHLOROFORM)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN KILLS
SITE
*
B
A
C
0
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
« OF
SAMPLES
10
13
10
10
87
88
86
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
IEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN t OF ARITH. MEAN
l SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
0.01
0.02
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.07
0.05
12
14
13
14
82
57
55
0.01
0.08
0.10
0.13
0.04
0.05
0.05
12
3
13
13
15
86
88
87
0.06
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.07
0.02
0.02
0.02
15
15
10
4
4
82
69
68
0.04
0.02
0.08
0.10
0.13
0.03
0.03
0.03
49
18
50
40
43
337
302
296
0.03
0.02
0.05
0.07
0.09
0.04
0.04
0.04
TRIC1OROMETHANE - CHC13 (CHLOROFORM)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PI SCATAWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN # OF ARITH. MEAN # OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
* SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
15
15
11
13
14
14
14
11
83
79
75
0.01
0.01
0.05
0.07
0.07
0.12
0.06
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.03
11
14
10
13
12
13
13
13
12
13
87
71
83
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.12
0.16
0.11
0.18
0.08
0.11
0.04
0.04
0.04
13
15
12
15
12
13
12
13
12
13
8
7
6
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.05
0.05
0.06
0.09
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
19
20
18
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.05
0.10
0.07
0.19
0.05
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.01
53
58
36
42
50
54
54
55
53
52
197
177
182
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.07
0.10
0.08
0.15
0.06
0.07
0.03
0.04
0.03
-------
Table III-3-9
TETRACHLOROHETHANE - CCU (CARBON TETRACHLORIDE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1968
SITE
CARTEftET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
*
B
A
C
0
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
* OF
SAMPLES
13
13
10
10
87
88
86
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.11
0.14
0.11
0 OF
SAMPLES
15
13
13
14
82
57
55
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1983
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
MEAN
3)
0.16
0.04
0.06
0.06
0.09
0.11
0.11
* OF
SAMPLES
14
2
13
13
15
86
87
86
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.17
0.19
0.05
0.10
0.07
0.08
0.10
0.08
9 OF
SAMPLES
15
15
10
4
4
81
68
66
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.15
0.18
0.06
0.12
0.07
0.06
0.08
0.06
* OF
SAMPLES
57
17
49
40
43
336
300
293
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.14
0.13
0.04
0.07
0.06
0.09
0.11
0.09
I
TETRACHLOROMETKANE - CCI4 (CARBON TETRACHLORIDE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
*
e
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
* OF
SAMPLES
15
15
11
13
14
14
14
11
83
79
75
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
IEAN
\
0.09
0.11
0.05
0.09
0.07
0.08
0.06
0.09
0.11
0.12
0.11
* OF
SAMPLES
11
14
10
13
12
13
13
13
12
13
87
71
83
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.11
0.12
0.09
0.10
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.12
0.12
0.21
0.13
0.20
0.16
*OF
SAMPLES
13
15
13
15
12
13
12
13
12
13
8
7
6
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.12
0.13
0.13
0.12
0.09
0.09
0.08
0.08
0.11
0.14
0.11
0.11
0.11
* OF
SAMPLES
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
19
20
18
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.15
0.15
0.22
0.12
0.11
0.13
0.11
0.12
0.10
0.18
0.02
0.03
0.02
«OF
SAMPLES
53
58
37
42
50
54
54
55
53
52
197
177
182
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.12
0.13
0.15
0.11
0.09
0.10
0.09
0.10
0.10
0.16
0.11
0.14
0.12
-------
Table III-3-10
1,1 DICHLOROETHANE - CH3CHC12 (ETHYLIDENE CHLORIDE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
f
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
OONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF ARITH. MEAN
* SAMPLES (ppb)
B
A
C
0
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
* OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN # OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
81
58
57
0.01
0.01
0.01
82
84
83
0.01
0.01
0.01
82
69
68
0.01
0.01
0.01
245
211
208
0.01
0.01
0.01
1,1 DICHLOROETHANE - CH3CHC12 (ETHYLIDENE CHLORIDE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 • SEPT 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF
* SAMPLES
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8 83
3 79
6 75
ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. HEAN
(ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
0.01 87 0.01
0.01 71 0.01
0.01 83 0.01
* OF ARITH. HEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
8 0.01
7 0.01
6 0.01
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
19 0.01
20 0.01
18 0.01
* OF
SAMPLES
197
177
182
ARITH. MEAN
-------
Table 1U-3-11
1,2 DICHLOROETHANE - CICH2CH2CI (ETHYLENE DICHLORIOE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT
1988
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN UAGHER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
*
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
* OF
SAMPLES
13
10
10
88
88
86
ARITH. MEAN
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.06
0.05
« OF
SAMPLES
14
13
14
82
57
55
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.04
* OF
SAMPLES
13
13
15
86
88
87
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.03
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
* OF
SAMPLES
10
4
4
82
69
68
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.04
0.02
0.08
0.03
0.01
0.02
# OF
SAMPLES
50
40
43
338
302
296
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.03
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
t
1,2 DICHLOROETHANE - CICH2CH2CI (ETHYLENE OICHLOR1DE)
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN UAGHER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTrENVEUE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
OONGAM HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE * OF
f SAMPLES
B
A
C
0
1
2
5
7
4
9
8 83
3 79
6 74
ARITH. MEAN
0.0
0.0
0.0
* OF ARITH. MEAN « OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARJTH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES
-------
Table 111-3-12
TRICHLOROETHYLENE - CICH=CHC12 (TRICNLOROETHENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING FIRST YEAR
OCTOBER 1987 JANUARY 1988 APRIL 1988 JULY 1988 OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
*
B
A
C
0
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
13
13
10
10
87
88
86
(PPb)
0.07
0.01
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.09
0.08
0 OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
15
14
13
14
82
57
55
(PPb)
0.05
0.05
0.17
0.08
0.07
0.10
0.08
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
14
2
13
13
15
85
87
86
(ppb)
0.07
0.07
0.02
0.03
0.03
0.07
0.08
0.06
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
15
13
10
4
4
82
69
68
(ppb)
0.04
0.06
0.02
0.04
0.02
0.08
0.06
0.06
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
57
15
50
40
43
336
301
295
(PPb)
0.06
0.06
0.03
0.08
0.05
0.08
0.08
0.07
TRICHLOROETHYLENE - CICH=CHC12 (TRECHLOROETHENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH.
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAVLEV SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAH HILLS
SITE
*
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
0 OF
SAMPLES
15
15
11
13
14
14
14
11
83
79
75
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
IEAN
i
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.09
0.04
0.03
0.09
0.07
0.07
0 OF
SAMPLES
11
14
10
13
12
13
13
13
12
13
87
71
83
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.03
0.01
0.04
0.04
0.10
0.12
0.09
0.17
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0 OF
SAMPLES
13
15
13
15
12
13
12
13
12
13
8
7
6
ARITH. KEAH
(PPb)
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.16
0.20
0.27
0.56
0.12
0.13
0.05
0.04
0.04
0 OF
SAMPLES
14
14
14
14
19
20
18
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.07
0.07
0.05
0.07
0.02
0.03
0.02
* OF
SAMPLES
53
58
37
42
35
39
39
40
38
37
197
177
182
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.05
0.10
0.12
0.13
0.27
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.06
0.07
-------
Table II1-3-13
1,1,1 TR1CHLOROETHANE - CH3CC13 (METHYL CHLOROFORM)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
*
B
A
C
D
1
2
S
7
4
9
8
3
6
*OF
SAMPLES
13
12
10
10
87
88
86
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.33
0.40
0.65
0.69
0.42
0.48
0.37
* OF
SAMPLES
13
14
13
14
81
57
55
MEAN
»
0.42
0.55
0.67
0.81
0.44
0.51
0.44
I OF
SAMPLES
14
3
13
13
15
86
88
87
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.52
0.86
0.47
0.42
0.47
0.34
0.31
0.25
* OF
SAMPLES
15
15
10
4
4
82
69
68
ARITH. MEAN
<«*>
0.61
0.69
0.33
0.52
0.41
0.40
0.27
0.26
* OF
SAMPLES
55
18
49
40
43
336
302
296
ARITH. MEAN
(K*>
0.35
0.72
0.45
0.57
0.63
0.40
0.39
0.32
1,1,1 TRICHLOROETHANE - CH3CC13 (METHYL CHLOROFORM)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PI SCATAWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF ARITH. MEAN * Of ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
* SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
15
15
11
13
13
14
14
11
81
78
72
0.57
0.72
0.33
0.39
0.43
0.42
0.34
0.30
0.50
0.38
0.42
11
14
10
13
12
13
13
13
12
13
87
71
83
0.70
0.76
0.82
0.55
0.43
0.50
0.54
0.52
0.38
0.47
0.49
0.41
0.41
13
15
13
15
12
13
12
13
12
13
8
7
6
0.49
0.38
0.39
0.30
0.40
0.43
0.62
0.53
0.36
0.33
0.57
0.28
0.33
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
19
20
18
0.51
0.48
0.52
0.38
0.42
0.56
0.51
0.51
0.31
0.35
0.22
0.20
0.19
53
58
37
42
50
54
53
55
53
52
195
176
179
0.56
0.58
0.56
0.40
0.40
0.47
0.52
0.49
0.35
0.36
0.47
0.37
0.39
-------
Table III-3-14
1.1,2 TRICHLOROETHANE - CH2CICHC12
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
PI SCATAWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
* SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
B
A
C
D
1 13 0.02 14 0.02 13 0.02 10 0.02 50 0.02
2 10 0.02 13 0.02 13 0.02 4 0.02 40 0.02
5 10 0.02 14 0.02 15 0.02 4 0.02 43 0.02
7
4
9
8
3
6
1,1,2 TRICHLOROETHANE - CH2CICHC12
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF
* SAMPLES
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8 83
3 79
6 75
ARITH. MEAN # OF ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
0.02 87 0.01
0.02 71 0.01
0.02 83 0.01
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
8 0.02
7 0.01
6 0.02
# OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
19 0.02
20 0.02
IB 0.02
# OF
SAMPLES
197
177
182
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.02
0.02
0.02
-------
Table Ul-3-15
T
i—
to
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE - Ct2C=CCl2 (TETRACHLOROETHENE)
SITE
SITE *
CARTERET B
ELIZABETH A
SEWAREN C
PI SCATAWAY D
SUSAN WAGNER HS 1
PS 26 2
PORT RICHMOND PO 5
PUMPING STATION 7
GREAT KILLS 4
TOTTENVILLE 9
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL 8
ELTINGVILLE 3
DONGAN HILLS 6
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE - C12OCC12 (TETRACHLOROETHANE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
WARIER BEGINNING
CTOBER 1987
* OF
SAMPLES
13
13
9
9
84
86
83
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.08
0.17
0.42
0.34
0.34
0.33
0.67
QUARTER
JANUARY
* OF
SAMPLES
15
14
13
14
74
52
48
BEGINNING
1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.15
.23
.23
.30
.35
.35
.66
« OF
SAMPLES
14
3
13
13
15
79
79
79
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.23
.38
.16
.13
.25
.26
.24
.51
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
* OF
SAMPLES
15
15
10
4
4
79
68
67
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.20
0.30
0.17
0.30
0.21
0.37
0.26
0.77
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 -
f OF
SAMPLES
57
18
50
39
42
316
285
276
SEPT 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.17
0.31
0.18
0.25
0.28
0.33
0.29
0.66
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
CHEAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
* SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
B
A
C
D
1
2
S
7
4
9
8
3
6
15
15
11
13
14
14
14
11
83
79
75
0.10
0.15
0.12
0.14
0.18
0.62
0.16
0.23
0.26
0.21
0.61
11
14
10
13
12
13
13
13
12
13
86
70
82
0.05
0.11
0.11
0.09
0.18
0.17
0.17
0.72
0.14
0.20
0.30
0.23
0.72
13
15
13
15
12
13
12
13
12
13
8
7
6
0.24
0.27
0.21
0.13
0.23
0.23
0.32
1.49
0.20
0.22
0.25
0.09
0.44
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
19
20
18
0.26
0.30
0.26
0.18
0.17
0.21
0.28
1.49
0.27
0.17
0.18
0.17
0.84
S3
58
37
42
50
54
54
55
53
52
196
176
181
0.17
0.21
0.21
0.13
0.18
0.19
0.24
1.09
0.20
0.20
0.27
0.21
0.68
-------
Table III-3-16
TRIBROMOMETHANE - CHBr3 (BROMOFORM)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
SITE *
CARTERET B
ELIZABETH A
SEWAREN C
PI SCATAWAY D
SUSAN WAGNER HS 1
PS 26 2
PORT RICHMOND PO 5
PUMPING STATION 7
GREAT KILLS 4
TOTTENVILLE 9
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL 8
ELTINGVILLE 3
DONGAN HILLS 6
# OF
SAMPLES
ARITH. MEAN
* OF
SAMPLES
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
* OF
SAMPLES
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
* OF
SAMPLES
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
« OF
SAMPLES
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
LJ
TRIBROMOMETHANE - CHBr3 (BROMOFORM)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF
« SAMPLES
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8 83
3 79
6 75
ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
0.01 86 0.01
0.01 69 0.01
0.01 82 0.01
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
8 0.01
7 0.01
6 0.01
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
19 0.01
20 0.01
18 0.01
* OF
SAMPLES
196
175
181
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.01
0.01
0.01
-------
Table 111-3-17
HEXANE - C6HK
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGV1UE
OONGAN HILLS
SITE
*
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
f OF
SAMPLES
13
87
88
86
ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SAMPLES
0.83 15
1.09 82
1.32 56
1.10 55
-------
Table 111-3-18
BENZENE - C6H6 (BENZOL, PHENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
PISCATAWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLET SET ON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
*
B
A
C
0
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
« OF
SAMPLES
13
13
10
10
87
88
86
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
EAN * OF ARITH. MEAN # OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
1.19
1.41
1.37
1.58
1.70
1.93
1.99
15
14
13
14
82
57
55
0.98
2.10
1.73
2.13
1.55
1.90
2.24
14
3
13
13
15
84
86
85
1.01
1.17
0.65
0.58
0.98
0.81
0.80
0.87
15
14
9
4
4
81
68
66
1.45
1.66
0.81
1.32
1.74
0.92
0.85
1.08
57
17
49
40
43
334
299
292
1.16
1.57
1.30
1.23
1.56
1.25
1.35
1.51
n
BEHZEME - C6H6 (BENZOL, PHENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAY LEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN # OF ARITH. MEAN
* SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
15
15
11
13
14
14
14
11
83
79
75
1.67
1.72
0.62
1.03
1.16
0.97
0.91
0.79
1.62
1.60
2.09
11 2.25
14
10
13
12
13
13
13
12
13
87
70
.86
.74
.79
.07
.46
.52
.28
.09
.04
.40
.61
83 2.12
13
15
12
15
12
13
12
13
12
13
8
6
6
1.28
1.25
0.95
0.57
0.69
1.17
1.52
1.11
0.84
0.67
0.72
0.62
0.76
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
16
13
0.84
0.96
0.92
0.65
0.69
1.39
1.21
1.26
0.86
0.91
0.63
0.82
0.74
53
58
36
42
50
54
54
55
53
52
193
171
177
1.48
1.45
1.16
0.97
0.77
1.27
1.34
1.16
0.92
0.86
1.40
1.50
1.96
-------
Table II1-3-19
TOLUEWE - C&H5CH3 (METHYL BENZENE)
QUARTER BEGIHNENG
OCTOBER 1987
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 19B8
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1968
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1983
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUARCM
PISCAfALUr
SUSAH UAGHER HS
PS 26
PORT (tlCHMOW PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETOH HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
PONGAM HILLS
SITE
t
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
» OF
SAMPLES
13
13
10
9
87
88
86
ARJTH, HEAM
2.83
1.88
3.22
3.74
4.71
5.70
5.19
* OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
14
Cppb) SAMPLES
1.70 14
3
(ppb) SAMPLES
3.01
2.90
15
15
(ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
5.02
5.24
56
18
3.18
4.85
14
13
14
82
57
55
2.32
3.20
4.65
4.24
5.19
5.67
13
13
15
79
79
78
1.46
2.17
a.67
2.65
2.71
2.86
10
4
79
68
67
2.07
3.29
3.63
4.14
3.68
4.18
50
40
42
327
292
286
1.93
2.88
3.6S
3.96
4.32
4.41
TOLUENE - C6H5CH3 (METHYL BENZENE)
QUARTER BECINNINC
OCTOBER 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SITE * OF
SITE * SAMPLES
CARTERET B 15
ELIZABETH A 15
SEUAREM C
H SCAT Aim D
SUSAN 1MGNER KS 1 11
PS 26 2 13
PORT RICHMOND PO 5 14
PUMPING STATION 7 14
MEAT KILLS 4 14
rOTTCNVJLLE 9 11
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL 8 83
ELTINGVILLE 3 79
OONGAN HILLS 6 75
ARITH. MEAN
4.18
4.59
1.76
3.21
3.56
3.52
2.78
2.56
3.48
3.55
4.09
* OF
SAMPLES
11
14
10
13
12
13
13
13
12
13
86
71
83
ARITH. MEAN
Cppb>
5.57
4.23
4.U
3.42
3.13
4.55
4.72
4.26
3.27
3.34
3.16
3.60
4.46
*OF
SAMPLES
13
15
12
15
12
13
12
13
12
13
8
7
6
AJUTH.
MEAN
»
2.82
2.83
2.05
1.27
2.13
3.38
4.36
3.49
2.58
2.17
2.39
1.95
2.59
# OF
SAMPLES
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
16
19
18
ARITH. MEAN
-------
Table 111-3-20
o-XYLENE - 1,2-(CH3)2C6H4 (1,2-DIMEWL BENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987 JANUARY 1988 APRIL 1988
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN UACNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVIIXE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
if
e
A
c
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
a
3
6
# OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
15
13
10
10
87
88
86
(Ppb)
0.33
0.33
0.53
0.81
0.53
0.61
0.63
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
tt
14
13
14
82
57
55
(ppb)
0.27
0.33
0.48
0.89
0.33
0.42
0.52
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
14
3
13
13
15
74
77
77
(ppb)
0.34
0.26
0.20
0.28
0.43
0.24
0.25
0.28
QUARTER BEGINNING FIRST YEAR
JULY 1988 OCT 1987 -
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
15
14
10
4
4
77
67
66
(ppb)
0.49
0.55
0.27
0.47
0.59
0.35
0.30
0.38
SEPT 1988
*OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
57
17
50
40
43
320
289
284
(Ppb)
0.36
0.50
0.28
0.43
0.68
0.37
0.40
0.46
o-XXLEHE - 1,Z-{CH3)2C6H4
BEKZ£«E>
QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING SECOND YEAR
OCTOBER 1988 JANUARY 1989 APRIL 1989 JULY 1989 OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PI SCAT AHA Y
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREM KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SfTON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
*
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
« OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
15
15
11
13
11
11
\\
8
83
79
75
(PPb)
0.53
0.52
0.24
0.40
0.46
0.38
0.36
0.26
0.42
0.40
0.53
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
11
13
10
13
12
13
13
13
12
13
84
67
80
(PPb)
0.48
0.45
0.49
0.29
0.38
0.50
0.61
0.50
0.43
0.38
0.38
0.41
0.56
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
13
15
12
15
12
13
12
13
12
13
8
7
6
(PPb)
0.29
0.26
0.24
0.12
0.28
0.40
0.58
0.47
0.35
0.28
0.25
0.21
0.29
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
19
20
18
-------
Table 111-3-21
R*p-KYLENES - 1.3-CCH3)2ttH4 I 1,4-
0.87
1.29
1.80
2.45
* OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN # OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
U
14
13
14
52
29
27
0.57
1.19
1.50
2.66
1.94
2.02
2.38
14
3
13
13
IS
75
77
76
0.86
0.83
0.70
0.92
1.33
1.38
1.38
15
15
10
4
4
77
67
65
1.51
1.71
0.83
1.55
1.83
2.14
1.68
2.31
56
18
50
40
43
204
173
168
0.96
1.56
1.02
1.39
2.07
1.81
1.68
2.00
nSp-XYLENES - 1,3-2C6H4
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
(1.3-OIHETHYL BENZENE i 1,4-DIHETHYL BENZENE)
CHARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989 APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT BICHHOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
t OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN 0 OF ARITH. HEAN # OF ARITH. MEAN * OF
0 SAMPLES
8
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
15
15
11
13
14
14
14
11
83
79
75
(ppb) SAMPLES Cppb) SAMPLES
1.59
1.61
0.78
1.30
1.54
1.22
1.20
0.93
2.06
2.00
2.59
11 1.55
13
10
13
12
13
13
13
.34
.34
1.81
.17
.61
.93
.64
12 1.39
13 1.22
85 1.67
69 1.87
81 2.47
13
15
12
15
12
13
12
13
12
13
8
7
6
Cppb) SAMPLES
0.76
0.49
0.48
0.25
0.88
1.27
1.89
1.53
1.13
0.89
1.17
C.77
1.30
14
14
14
14
15
15
15
15
15
15
(ppb) SAMPLES
0.76
0.82
0.82
0.54
0.87
.49
.71
.62
.08
.10
53
57
36
42
50
54
54
55
53
52
176
155
162
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
ARITH. HEAN
1.16
1.06
0.85
0.52
0.92
1.42
1.76
1.50
1.19
1.04
1.83
1.89
2.48
-------
Table IH-3-22
t>
t-i
V0
STYRENE - C6H5CH=CH2
(VINYL BENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREtl
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DOHGAH HILLS
SITE * Of
« SAMPLES
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
6
3
6
AR1T«. MAM # Of ARITH. HEAH * OF ASITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN # OF ARITH. MEAN
> SAMPLES (ppb)
82 0.10 74 0.06 77 0.08 23J 0.08
57 0.12 77 0.05 67 0.07 201 0.08
55 0.12 77 0.07 66 0.08 198 0.09
STYRENE • C6H5CH=CH2
(VINYL BENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 19S9
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN IMGMEft HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TGTTEKV1UE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF
* SAMPLES
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8 83
3 79
6 74
ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. HEAM
(ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
0 09 84 0.08 8 0.05 19 O.OS 194 0.08
0.09 68 0.09 7 0.03 20 0.06 174 0.08
0 12 80 0.11 6 O.OS 18 0.06 178 0.11
-------
fable 111-3-23
ETHYL BENZENE - C6H5CN2CH3
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN UAGMER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUHPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTEMV1LLE
BAYLET SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
OONGAM HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 196?
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST TEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE * OF
* SAMPLES
B
A
C
0
1 13
2 9
5 9
7
4
9
8
3
6
ARITH. MEAN * OF
(ppb) SAMPLES
0.19 14
0.34 13
0.53 14
82
57
55
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.24
0.36
0.59
0.92
1.25
1.49
« OF
SAMPLES
13
13
15
75
77
76
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.11
0.18
0.27
0.45
0.46
0.53
* OF
SAMPLES
10
4
4
78
67
66
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.15
0.34
0.41
0.62
0.56
0.67
41 OF
SAMPLES
50
39
42
235
201
197
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.18
0.29
0.45
0.67
0.71
0.85
ETHYL BENZENE - C6H5CH2CH3
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
*
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
f OF ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN * OF
SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES (ppb) SAMPLES
83 0.57 85 0.49 8
79 0.57 68 0.55 7
75 0.72 81 0.71 6
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.33
0.24
0.34
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
19 0.28
20 0.39
18 0.33
* or
SAMPLES
195
174
180
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.50
0.53
0.66
-------
Table 111-3-24
CHLOROBENZENE - C6H5CI
T
Is*
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREH
PI SCAT AWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAM HILLS
SITE
0
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
00F
SAMPLES
13
9
9
87
88
86
ARITK. MEAN
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0 OF
SAMPLES
14
13
14
82
57
55
0.71
(PPb)
0.01
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0 OF
SAMPLES
13
13
15
78
77
77
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.02
0.02
0.02
* OF
SAMPLES
10
4
4
0.01
0.02
0.01
80
69
68
ARITH. MEAN
Cppb)
0.02
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0 OF
SAMPLES
50
39
42
327
291
286
ARITH. MEAN
-------
lable 111-3-25
T
KJ
K)
o-DICHLOftOBENZENE - 1.2-C12C6H4 (1,2-OICHLOROBENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987 JANUARY 1968
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
13
10
10
0.02
0.02
0.02
K
13
14
SITE
SITE *
CARTERET B
ELIZABETH A
SEUAREN C
PISCATAUAY 0
SUSAN UAGNER HS 1
PS 26 2
PORT RICHMOND PO 5
PUMPING STATION 7
GREAT KILLS 4
TOTTEKVILLE 9
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL B
ELTINGVILLE 3
DONGAM HILLS 6
O-DICMLOROBENZEKE - 1.2-C12C6H4 (1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988 JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
« OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
0.02
0.02
0.02
13
15
0.02
0.02
0.02
10
4
4
0.02
0,02
0.01
50
40
43
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
0.02
0.02
0.02
SECOND TEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF
* SAMPLES
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8 83
3 79
6 75
ARITH. HEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
(ppb} SAMPLES (ppb)
0.01 84 0.01
0.01 68 0.01
0.01 80 0.01
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
8 0.01
7 0.01
6 0.01
f OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
19 0.01
20 0.01
IB 0.01
f OF
SAMPLES
194
174
179
ARITH. MEAN
0.01
0.01
0.01
-------
Table III-3-26
T
m-DICHLOROBENZENE - 1.3-C12C6H4 (1,3-OICHLOROBENZEME)
QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987 JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
13
10
10
0.03
0.06
0.06
* OF
SAMPLES
14
13
14
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
SITE *
CARTERET B
ELIZABETH A
SEWAREN C
PISCATAUAY D
SUSAN WAGNER HS 1
PS 26 2
PORT RICHMOND PO S
PUMPING STATION 7
GREAT KILLS 4
TOTTENVILLE 9
BAVLEY SETON HOSPITAL 8
ELTINGVILLE 3
DONGAN HILLS 6
m-DICHLOROBENZENE - 1.3-CI2C6H4 (1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988 JANUARY 1989
0.04
0.04
0.07
* OF
SAMPLES
13
13
15
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.03
0.03
0.06
* OF
SAMPLES
10
4
4
ARITH. MEAN
O.OS
0.07
0.09
* OF
SAMPLES
50
40
43
ARITH. MEAM
(PPb)
0.04
0.04
0.07
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE * OF
* SAMPLES
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8 83
3 78
6 75
ARITH. MEAN # OF ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
0.01 84 0.07
0.01 67 0.03
0.01 80 0.08
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
8 0.01
7 0.01
6 0.01
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
19 0.01
20 0.01
18 0.01
* OF
SAMPLES
194
172
179
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.04
0.04
0.04
-------
Table III-3-27
p-DlCHLOROBENZENE - 1.4-C12C6H4 (1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINMING QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987 JANUARY 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
t>
M
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAV
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENV1LLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
OOMGAH HILLS
SITE * OF
* SAMPLES
B
A
C
0
1 13
2 10
5 10
7
4
9
8
3
6
ARITH. MEAN * OF ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SAMPLES (ppb)
0.01 H 0.01
0.01 13 0.01
0.01 14 0.01
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
13 0.01
13 0.01
15 O.Ot
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
10 0.01
4 0.01
4 0.01
* OF ARITH. MEAN
SAMPLES (ppb)
50 0.01
40 0.01
43 0.01
p-OICHLOROBENZENE - 1,4-Ct2C6H4 (1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988 JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT
1989
SITE * OF
SITE * SAMPLES
CARTERET B
ELIZABETH A
SEUAREN C
PISCATAUAY D
SUSAN WAGNER MS 1
PS 26 2
PORT RICHMOND PO 5
PUMPING STATION 7
GREAT KILLS 4
TOTTENVILLE 9
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL 8 83
ELTINGVILLE 3 79
DONGAN HILLS 6 74
ARITH. MEAH
(Ppb)
0.17
0.18
0.19
* OF
SAMPLES
ARITH. MEAN
84
67
80
0.15
0.15
0.15
* OF
SAMPLES
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
* OF
SAMPLES
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
8
7
7
0.17
0.16
0.17
19
20
18
0.15
0.15
0.15
* OF
SAMPLES
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
194
173
179
0.16
0.16
0.17
-------
RANK ORDERING OF SITES BY ANNUAL AVERAGE CONCENTRATION
TABLES III-3-28 - III-3-48
A-25
-------
Table III-3-28
DICHLOROMETHANE - CH2C12 (METHYLENE CHLORIDE)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
SITE
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
SUSAN WAGNER HS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
SITE
#
5
2
1
3
8
6
B
A
7
9
4
D
C
I OF
SAMPLES
46
40
50
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.71
0.71
0.52
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
#
2
5
7
9
4
1
3
8
6
A
B
D
C
# OF
SAMPLES
54
54
55
52
53
50
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.93
0.85
0.76
0.60
0.50
0.47
A-26
-------
Table III-3-29
TRICLOROMETHANE - CHC13 (CHLOROFORM)
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
SITE
PUMPING STATION
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
PISCATAWAY
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.09
0.07
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.02
SITE
#
5
2
1
8
3
6
B
A
7
9
4
D
C
# OF
SAMPLES
43
40
50
337
302
296
49
18
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.15
0.10
0.08
0.07
0.07
0.06
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
SITE
#
7
2
5
9
1
4
3
8
6
B
A
C
D
# OF
SAMPLES
55
54
54
52
50
53
177
197
182
53
58
36
42
A-27
-------
Table III-3-30
TETRACHLOROMETHANE - CC14 (CARBON TETRACHLORIDE)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
SITE
#
A
B
3
8
6
2
5
1
7
9
4
D
C
# OF
SAMPLES
17
57
300
336
293
40
43
49
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.18
0.14
0.11
0.09
0.09
0.07
0.06
0.04
SITE
TOTTENVILLE
SEWAREN
ELTINGVILLE
ELIZABETH
DONGAN HILLS
CARTERET
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
PISCATAWAY
PS 26
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.16
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.12
0.12
0.11
0.11
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.09
0.09
SITE
#
9
C
3
A
6
B
8
D
2
4
7
5
1
# OF
SAMPLES
52
37
177
58
182
53
197
42
54
53
55
54
50
A-28
-------
Table III-3-31
1,1 DICHLOROETHANE - CH3CHC12 (ETHYLIDENE CHLORIDE)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
SITE
#
8
6
3
5
4
9
2
D
7
B
1
C
A
SITE
#
8
6
3
5
4
9
2
D
7
B
1
C
A
# OF
SAMPLES
245
208
211
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.01
0.01
0.01
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
I OF
SAMPLES
197
182
177
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.01
0.01
0.01
A-29
-------
Table III-3-32
1,2 DICHLOROETHANE - C1CH2CH2C1 (ETHYLENE DICHLORIDE)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
SUSAN WAGNER HS
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
SITE
#
5
8
1
3
6
2
7
B
A
9
4
D
C
# OF
SAMPLES
43
338
50
302
296
40
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
#
8
6
3
5
4
9
2
D
7
B
1
C
A
# OF
SAMPLES
197
181
177
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.03
0.02
0.02
A-30
-------
Table III-3-33
TRICHLOROETHYLENE - C1CH=CHC12 (TRICHLOROETHENE)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
PS 26
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
SITE
PUMPING STATION
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PISCATAWAY
CARTERET
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
SITE
#
2
3
8
6
B
A
5
1
7
9
4
D
C
# OF
SAMPLES
40
301
336
295
57
15
43
50
ARITH. MEAN
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.06
0.05
0.03
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE | OF ARITH. MEAN
# SAMPLES (PPb)
7
5
2
1
8
9
4
6
3
D
B
C
A
40
39
39
35
197
37
38
182
177
42
53
37
58
0.27
0.13
0.12
0.10
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.07
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.04
A-31
-------
Table III-3-34
1,1,1 TRICHLOROETHANE - CH3CC13 (METHYL CHLOROFORM)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
ELIZABETH
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
SEWAREN
PISCATAWAY
SITE
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
SEWAREN
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PISCATAWAY
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
SITE
#
A
5
2
B
1
8
3
6
7
9
4
C
D
1 OF
SAMPLES
18
43
40
55
49
336
302
296
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.72
0.63
0.57
0.48
0.45
0.40
0.39
0.32
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.58
0.56
0.56
0.52
0.49
0.47
0.47
0.40
0.40
0.39
0.37
0.36
0.35
SITE
#
A
B
C
5
7
8
2
1
D
6
3
9
4
# OF
SAMPLES
58
53
37
53
55
195
54
50
42
179
176
52
53
A-32
-------
Table III-3-35
1,1/2 TRICHLOROETHANE - CH2C1CHC12
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SEWAREN
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PISCATAWAY
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
#
5
1
2
7
4
9
C
8
A
B
D
3
6
# OF
SAMPLES
43
50
40
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.02
0.02
0.02
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
#
8
6
3
5
4
9
2
D
7
B
1
C
A
# OF
SAMPLES
197
182
177
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.02
0.02
0.02
A-33
-------
Table III-3-36
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE -
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELIZABETH
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
CARTERET
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
SITE
PUMPING STATION
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
PORT RICHMOND PO
ELTINGVILLE
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
CARTERET
PISCATAWAY
(TETRACHLOROETHENE)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.66
0.33
0.31
0.29
0.28
0.25
0.18
0.17
SITE
#
6
8
A
3
5
2
1
B
9
4
7
D
C
# OF
SAMPLES
276
316
18
285
42
39
50
57
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
1.09
0.68
0.27
0.24
0.21
0.21
0.21
0.20
0.20
0.19
0.18
0.17
0.13
SITE
#
7
6
8
5
3
A
C
4
9
2
1
B
D
* OF
SAMPLES
55
181
196
54
176
58
37
53
52
54
50
53
42
A-34
-------
Table III-3-37
TRIBROMOMETHANE - CHBr3 (BROMOFORM)
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
PISCATAWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
#
B
A
C
D
1
2
5
7
4
9
8
3
6
# OF
SAMPLES
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
#
8
6
3
5
4
9
2
D
7
B
1
C
A
# OF
SAMPLES
196
181
175
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.01
0.01
0.01
A-35
-------
Table III-3-38
HEXANE - C6H14
SITE
ELIZABETH
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
CARTERET
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
PORT RICHMOND PO
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PUMPING STATION
PS 26
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
SITE
CARTERET
ELTINGVILLE
ELIZABETH
DONGAN HILLS
SEWAREN
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
PISCATAWAY
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
1.42
0.93
0.81
0.81
0.79
SITE
1
A
3
6
B
8
5
9
1
7
2
4
D
C
# OF
SAMPLES
18
301
294
57
336
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
1.08
0.89
0.91
0.86
0.84
0.77
0.50
SITE
#
B
3
A
6
C
8
D
5
7
9
4
2
1
# OF
SAMPLES
53
173
56
180
36
197
42
A-36
-------
Table III-3-39
BENZENE - C6H6 (BENZOL, PHENE)
SITE
ELIZABETH
PORT RICHMOND PO
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
PS 26
CARTERET
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
SEWAREN
PISCATAWAY
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
1.57
1.56
1.51
1.35
1.30
25
23
SITE
#
A
5
6
3
1
8
2
B
7
9
4
C
D
# OF
SAMPLES
17
43
292
299
49
334
40
57
1
1
1.16
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
SEWAREN
PISCATAWAY
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SITE
#
6
3
B
A
8
5
2
7
C
D
4
9
1
# OF
SAMPLES
177
171
53
58
193
54
54
55
36
42
53
52
50
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
1.96
1.
1.
1.
1.
.50
48
45
40
1.34
1.27
1.16
1.16
0.97
0.92
0.86
0.77
A-37
-------
Table III-3-40
TOLUENE - C6H5CH3 (METHYL BENZENE)
SITE
ELIZABETH
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
PORT RICHMOND PO
CARTERET
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
4.85
4.41
4.32
3.96
3.65
3.18
2.88
1.93
SITE
#
A
6
3
8
5
B
2
1
9
4
7
D
C
# OF
SAMPLES
18
286
292
327
43
56
40
50
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
DONGAN HILLS
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
GREAT KILLS
SEWAREN
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PISCATAWAY
SITE
#
5
6
2
7
B
A
3
8
4
C
9
1
D
# OF
SAMPLES
54
182
54
55
53
58
176
193
53
36
52
50
42
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
4.25
4.10
88
,87
,80
,62
,45
3.19
2.89
2.88
2.81
2.42
2.11
3
3
3
3
3
A-38
-------
Table III-3-41
O-XYLENE - 1,2-(CH3)2C6H4 (1, 2-DIMETHYL BENZENE)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
ELIZABETH
DONGAN HILLS
PS 26
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
DONGAN HILLS
PUMPING STATION
PS 26
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
PISCATAWAY
SITE
#
5
A
6
2
3
8
B
1
7
9
4
D
C
# OF
SAMPLES
43
17
284
40
289
320
57
50
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.68
0.50
0.46
0.43
0.41
0.37
0.36
0.28
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
SITE
#
5
6
7
2
A
B
3
8
4
9
1
C
D
# OF
SAMPLES
51
179
52
54
57
53
173
194
50
49
50
36
42
0,
0,
55
51
0.46
0.44
0.40
0.40
38
38
0.37
0.32
0.30
0.31
0.24
0,
0,
A-39
-------
Table III-3-42
m&p-XYLENES - 1, 3-(CH3) 2C6H4 & 1, 4-(CH3) 2C6H4
(1,3-DIMETHYL BENZENE & 1,4-DIMETHYL BENZENE)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
ELIZABETH
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
CARTERET
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
SITE
#
5
6
8
3
A
2
1
B
7
9
4
D
C
# OF
SAMPLES
43
168
204
173
18
40
50
56
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
2.07
2.00
1.81
1.68
1.56
1.39
1.02
0.96
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
PS 26
GREAT KILLS
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
PISCATAWAY
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
SITE
#
6
3
8
5
7
2
4
B
A
9
1
C
D
# OF
SAMPLES
162
155
176
54
55
54
53
53
57
52
50
36
42
2,
1,
1,
1,
1,
48
89
83
1.76
1.50
1.42
1.19
1.16
06
04
0.92
0.85
0.52
A-40
-------
Table III-3-43
STYRENE - C6H5CH=CH2 (VINYL BENZENE)
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
#
6
8
3
5
4
9
2
D
7
B
1
C
A
I OF
SAMPLES
198
233
201
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.09
0.08
0.08
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
#
6
8
3
5
4
9
2
D
7
B
1
C
A
# OF
SAMPLES
178
194
174
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.11
0.08
0.08
A-&1
-------
Table III-3-44
ETHYL BENZENE - C6H5CH2CH3
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
CARTERET
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
#
6
3
8
5
2
1
4
D
7
9
B
C
A
# OF
SAMPLES
197
201
235
42
39
50
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.85
0.71
0.67
0.45
0.29
0.18
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
#
6
3
8
5
4
9
2
D
7
B
1
C
A
# OF
SAMPLES
180
174
195
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.66
0.53
0.50
A-42
-------
Table III-3-45
CHLOROBENZENE - C6H5C1 (PHENYLCHLORIDE)
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
# OF
SAMPLES
42
39
50
291
327
286
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
SITE
#
5
2
1
3
8
6
7
B
A
9
4
D
C
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE | OF ARITH. MEAN
I SAMPLES (ppb)
8
6
3
5
4
9
2
D
7
B
1
C
A
196
181
175
0.01
0.01
0.01
A-43
-------
Table III-3-46
o-DICHLOROBENZENE - 1,2-C12C6H4 (1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SEWAREN
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PISCATAWAY
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
SITE
#
5
1
2
7
4
9
C
8
A
B
D
3
6
SITE
#
8
6
3
5
4
9
2
D
7
B
1
C
A
# OF
SAMPLES
43
50
40
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.02
0.02
0.02
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
# OF
SAMPLES
194
179
174
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.01
0.01
0.01
A-44
-------
Table III-3-47
m-DICHLOROBENZENE - 1,3-C12C6H4 (1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
SEWAREN
CARTERET
PISCATAWAY
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
SITE
#
5
1
2
C
B
D
A
7
4
9
8
3
6
SITE
ft
8
6
3
5
4
9
2
D
7
B
1
C
A
# OF
SAMPLES
43
50
40
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.07
0.04
0.04
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
# OF
SAMPLES
194
172
173
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.04
0.04
0.04
A-45
-------
Table III-3-48
p-DICHLOROBENZENE - 1,4-C12C6H4 (1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE)
FIRST YEAR
OCT 1987 - SEPT 1988
SITE
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PORT RICHMOND PO
CARTERET
PUMPING STATION
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
SITE
#
2
1
5
B
7
D
C
A
4
9
8
3
6
I OF
SAMPLES
40
50
43
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.01
0.01
0.01
SECOND YEAR
OCT 1988 - SEPT 1989
SITE
*
6
8
3
5
4
9
2
D
7
B
1
C
A
# OF
SAMPLES
179
194
173
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.17
0.16
0.16
A-46
-------
RANK ORDERING OF SITES BY QUARTERLY AVERAGE CONCENTRATION
TABLES III-3-49 - III-3-69
A-47
-------
TabAe 1U-3-W
I
00
DICN.OROMETHANE - CH-.CI-, (METHYLENE CHLORIDE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. HEAN
SITE
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER MS
PORT RICHMOND PO
ELTINGVIUE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON NOSP
CARTERET
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
TOTfEMVILLE
PISCATAUAY
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
0.69
0.63
0.62
SITE
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
CLT1NGVILLE
PONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
CARTERET
PUMPING STATION
SEUAREM
TOTUNVHLE
GREAT KILLS
ELIZABETH
PISCATAUAY
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 198B
A8ITH. HEAN
(ppb) SITE
0.69 PORT RICHMOND PO
0.66 SUSAN LAGNER HS
0.57 PS 26
ELTINGVILLE
OONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KI1LS
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. HEAN
SITE
PUMPING STATION
PS Z6
PORT RICHMOND PO
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
SUSAN WAGNER HS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
(Pf*>
0.70
0.63
0.62
0.62
0.49
0.39
SITE
PS 26
PUMP IMG STATION
TOTTENVtLLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PtSCATAUAY
SEUAREN
ARITH. MEAN
(PP*»
0.95
0.93
0.71
0.70
0.69
0.61
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
PUMPIMG STATION
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREH
PISCATAUAY
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
0.61 PORT RICHMOND PO
0.44 PS 26
0.40 SUSAN WAGNER HS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAtt HILLS
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
PUHPIMC STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. HEAN
(ppb)
0.82
0.69
0.39
SITE
1.70 PS 26
0.94 PUMPING STATION
0.63 PORT RICHMOND PO
0.57 TOTTENVILLE
0.53 GREAT KILLS
0.41 SUSAN UAGNER HS
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
1.16
0.78
0.52
0.50
0.49
0.31
-------
Table 111-3-50
TRICLORONETHANE - CHCt, (CHLOROFORM)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
SITE
ELTINGVIUE
PORT RICHMOND f>0
PS 26
BAYLEY 5ETON HOSP
OONGAN HILLS
SUSAN UAGNER HS
CARTERET
PIMPING STATION
SEUAREN
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
ELIZABETH
PJSCATAUAY
ARITH. MEAN
>
0.07
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.02
0.01
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER KS
DOHGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAVLEY SETON HOSP
CARTERET
PUMPING STATION
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PJSCATAUAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
0.13
0.10
0.06
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.01
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
CARTEm
SUSAN UAGNER HS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELIZABETH
ELTINGVILLE
PUMPING STATION
TOTTEHVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
0.07
0.06
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
CARTERET
BAYLEY SETOK HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STM1DH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PtSCATAUAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
0.13
0.10
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.02
SITE
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
-------
Table 111-3-51
TETRACHLOROMETHANE - CC14 (CARBON IETRACHLORIDE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
SITE
ELTINGVILLE
OONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
CARTERET
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
ARITH. MEAN
(Pf*>
O.U
0.11
0.11
0.08
0.03
0.03
0.03
SITE
CARTERET
ELTINGVILLE
OONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.16
0.11
0.11
0.09
0.06
0.06
0.04
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
SJTE
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
ELTINGVILLE
PS 26
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILL
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
SEWAREN
PISCATAWAY
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.19
0.17
0.10
0.10
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.05
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PS 26
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
SEWAREN
PISCATAWAY
0.18
0.15
0.12
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.06
0.06
Ul
o
SITE
ELTINGVILLE 0.12
ELIZABETH 0.11
BAYLEY SETON HOSP 0.11
OONGAN HILLS 0.11
CARTERET 0.09
PS 26 0.09
TOTTENVILLE 0.09
PUMPING STATION 0.08
PORT RICHMOND PO 0.07
GREAT KILLS 0.06
SUSAN WAGNER HS 0.05
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
TOTTENVILLE
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
GREAT KILLS
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STATION
SUSAN WAGNER HS
CARTERET
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
PORT RICHMOND PO
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
0.21 TOTTENVILLE
0.20 SEWAREN
0.16 ELIZABETH
0.13 CARTERET
0.12 PI SCATAWAY
0.12 BAYLEY SETON HOSP
0.12 DONGAN HILLS
0.12 ELTINGVILLE
0.11 GREAT KILLS
0.10 PS 26
0.10 SUSAN WAGNER HS
0.09 PUMPING STATION
0.08 PORT RICHMOND PO
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.14
0.13
0.13
0.12
0.12
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.09
0.09
0.08
0.08
SITE
SEWAREN
TOTTENVILLE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
PISCATAWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
0.22
0.18
0.15
0.15
0.13
0.12
0.12
0.11
0.11
0.10
0.03
0.02
0.02
-------
Table 111-3-52
DICHLOROETHANE -
(ETHYL1DENE CHLORIDE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 198?
ARITK. HEAN
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYlEY SETOH HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONCAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
SITE
BATLEY SETOM HOSP
OOHGAM HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PI SCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
ARITH. HEAN
(PPb)
0.01
Q. 01
0.01
SITE
BAYLEY SETON NOSP
OOUGMi KILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHNOHO PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNEft HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. HEAN
(ppb) SITE
0.01
0.01
0.01
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
BCHGM4 HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
P1SCMAUA1
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGHER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1968
ARITH. MEAN
I ppb>
0.01
0.01
0.01
SITE
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
OONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PI SCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGHER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
0.01
0.01
0.01
QUARTER BEGINNING
4AMUAKY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGA* HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSMt UAGHER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
0.01
0.01
0.01
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. HEAN
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DOHGAH HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CAftTERET
SUSMt UKGHER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
0.01
0.01
0.01
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
OONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CAHTERET
SUSMI UftGHER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1969
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.01
0.01
0.01
-------
Table UI-3-53
1,2 D1CHLOROETHANE - ClCH2CH2Cl (ETHYLENE DICHLORIDE)
£
ho
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
OONGAN HILLS
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
CARTERET
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
0.07
0.06
O.OS
0.03
0.03
0.02
PORT RICHMOND PO
DONGAN HILLS
SUSAN UAGNER HS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.03
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN UAGNER HS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
0.03
0.02
0.02
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.03
0.03
0.03
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN UAGNER HS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PS 26
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.02
0.01
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
0.02
0.01
0.01
BAVLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.02
0.01
0.01
-------
Table Ul-3-54
s
TRICHLOROETKYLENE - ClCH=CHCl2 (TRICHLOROtTHENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETOM HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
CARTERET
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
TOTTENVULE
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
0.09
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.06
0.03
0.01
SITE
PS 26
ELTIHGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETOH HOSP
SUSAN UAGNER HS
CARTERET
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
PISCATAUAY
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PUMPING STATION
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN UAGNER HS
ELIZABETH
PS 26
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
CARTERET
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
0.09
0.09
0.07
0.07
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.03
SITE
PUMPING STATION
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PORT RICHMOND PO
DONGAN HILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTtNGVILLE
GREAT KILLS
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAV
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
0.17
0.10
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.05
0.05
SITE
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
OONGAN HILLS
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
0.17
0.12
0.10
0.09
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.07
0.04
0.04
0.03
0.01
SITE
PUMPING STATION
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
CARTERET
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
0.08
0.07
0.07
0.07
0.06
0.03
0.03
0.02
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
ELIZABETH
DONGAN HILLS
CARTERET
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
0.56
0.27
0.20
0.16
0.13
0.12
0.05
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
SITE
CARTERET
SEUAREH
ELIZABETH
PISCATAUAY
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
TOTTEHVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
SUSAN UAGNER NS
PORT RICHMOND PO
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
-------
Table 111-3-55
1,1,1 TRICHLOROETHANE - CH3CCl, (METHYL CHLOROFORM)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
SUSAN UAGNER HS
DONGAN HILLS
CARTERET
PUMPING STATION
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEUAREN
0.69
0.65
0.48
0.42
0.40
0.37
0.33
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
CARTERET
PUMPING STATION
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.81
0.67
0.55
0.51
0.44
0.44
0.42
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
SITE
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PI SCAT AWAY
PUMPING STATION
SEUAREN
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.86
0.52
0.47
0.47
0.42
0.34
0.31
0.25
SITE
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
BAYLEV SETON HOSP
SUSAN UAGNER HS
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PUMPING STATION
SEUAREN
PI SCATAWAY
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.69
0.61
0.52
0.41
0.40
0.33
0.27
0.26
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
DONGAN HILLS
PS 26
ELTINGVILLE
GREAT KILLS
SUSAN UAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
0.72
0.57
0.50
0.43
0.42
0.42
0.39
0.38
0.34
0.33
0.30
SITE
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PISCATAUAY
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
PS 26
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN UAGNER HS
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
GREAT KILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.82
0.76
0.70
0.55
0.54
0.52
0.50
0.49
0.47
0.43
0.41
0.41
0.38
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
PISCATAUAY
ELTINGVILLE
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.62
0.57
0.53
0.49
0.43
0.40
0.39
0.38
0.36
0.33
0.33
0.30
0.28
SITE
PS 26
SEUAREN
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
PORT RICHMOND PO
ELIZABETH
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PISCATAUAY
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.56
0.52
0.51
0.51
0.51
0.48
0.42
0.38
0.35
0.31
0.22
0.20
0.19
-------
Table Ilt-3-56
1,1,2 TR1CHLOROETHANE - CH2CICHC12
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
AR1TH. MEAN
K
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER MS
PS 26
PUHPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILIE
SEUAREM
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PI SCATAWAY
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
0.02
0.02
0.02
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER MS
PS 26
PUHPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SEUAREN
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
P1SCATAUAY
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
AftlTH. HE AN
(ppb)
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
0.02
0.02
0.02
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SEUAREN
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PISCATAUAV
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
ARITH. MEAN
(ppt>>
0.02
0.02
0.02
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SEUAREN
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PI SCATAWAY
ELTENGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITfl. MEAN
(PPb>
0.02
0.02
0.02
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGKEft HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
0.02
0.02
0.02
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEUAREH
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb>
0.01
0.01
0.01
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUHPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.02
0.02
0.01
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1969
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUHPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
0.02
0.02
0.02
-------
Table 111-3-57
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE - C12C=CC12 (TETRACHLOROETHENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
SUSAN UAGNER HS
CARTERET
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
0.67
0.42
0.34
0.34
0.33
0.17
0.08
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PS 26
CARTERET
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
TOTTENVILLE
PUMPING STATION
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.66
0.35
0.35
0.30
0.23
0.23
0.15
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
ELIZABETH
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PORT RICHMOND PO
ELTINGVILLE
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PS 26
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
0.51
0.38
0.26
0.25
0.24
0.23
0.16
0.13
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELIZABETH
PS 26
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.77
0.37
0.30
0.30
0.26
0.21
0.20
0.17
SITE
PUMPING STATION 0.62
DONGAN HILLS 0.61
BAYLEY SETON HOSP 0.26
TOTTENVILLE 0.23
ELTINGVILLE 0.21
PORT RICHMOND PO 0.18
GREAT KILLS 0.16
ELIZABETH 0.15
PS 26 0.14
SUSAN UAGNER HS 0.12
CARTERET 0.10
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
PUMPING STATION
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
GREAT KILLS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
PISCATAUAY
CARTERET
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
0.72
0.72
0.30
0.23
0.20
0.18
0.17
0.17
0.14
0.11
0.11
0.09
0.05
PUMPING STATION
DONGAN HILLS
PORT RICHMOND PO
ELIZABETH
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PS 26
TOTTENVILLE
SEUAREN
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAUAY
ELTINGVILLE
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
1.49 .PUMPING STATION
0.44 DONGAN HILLS
0.32 ELIZABETH
0.27 PORT RICHMOND PO
0.25 SEUAREN
0.24 GREAT KILLS
0.23 CARTERET
0.23 PS 26
0.22 BAYLEY SETON HOSP
0.21 PISCATAUAY
0.20 TOTTENVILLE
0.13 SUSAN UAGNER HS
0.09 ELTINGVILLE
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
1.49
0.84
0.30
0.28
0.28
0.27
0.26
0.21
0.18
0.18
0.17
0.17
0.17
-------
Table 111-3-58
TRIBROMOMETHANE - CHBr3 (BROMOFORH)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
>
U
SITE
CART6RET
ELIZABETH
SEUAftEN
PISCATAWAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETOH HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
CARIERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAWAY
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
8AYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH, MEAN
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PI SCATAWAY
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PIMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
OONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
CARTERS!
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PI SCATAWAY
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SITE
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
0.01
0.01
0.01
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
0.01
0.01
0.01
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
0.01
0.01
0.01
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CAftTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
0.01
0.01
0.01
-------
Table 111-3-59
HEXAME -
in
OB
SITE
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLET SETON HOSP
CARTERET
PORT RICHMOND PO
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PI SCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
SUSAN WAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
1.32
1.10
1.09
0.83
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
CARTERET
PORT RICHMOND PO
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PI SCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
SUSAN WAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
1.22
1.19
0.99
0.57
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
SITE
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEUAREN
GREAT KILLS
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
1.04
1.01
0.98
0.95
0.9S
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PISCATAWAY
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
PORT RICHMOND PO
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
PORT RICHMOND PO
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PUMPING STATION
PS 26
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
1.55
1.18
1.06
0.87
0.85
0.83
0.67
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
PISCATAWAY
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
PORT RICHMOND PO
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.92
0.75
0.61
0.49
0.48
SITE
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
PORT RICHMOND PO
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PUMPING STATION
PS 26
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
1.12
0.80
0.78
0.51
0.49
0.41
0.34
SITE
ELTINGVILLE
SEWAREN
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PISCATAWAY
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
PORT RICHMOND PO
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
1.52
1.08
0.64
0.60
0.54
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.88
0.74
0.73
0.67
0.56
0.55
0.37
-------
Table II1-3-60
in
vo
BENZENE - C8He (BENZOL, PHENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLET SETON HOSP
PORT R1CHHOHD PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
CARTERET
GREAT KILLS
PI SCATAWAY
TOTTENVILLE
PUMPING STATION
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
1.99
1.93
1.70
.58
1.41
1.J7
1.19
SITE
OONGAN HILLS
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
ELT1MGVILLE
PS 26
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
CARTERET
PUMPING STATION
SEWAREN
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
SITE
ARITH. MEAN
(PI*)
DONGAN HILLS
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
BATLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN WAGNER
PISCATAWAY
SEUAREN
HS
2.09
1.72
1.67
1.62
1.60
1.16
1.03
0.97
0.91
0.79
0.62
SITE
CARTERET
DONGAN HILLS
ELIZABETH
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
BAVLEY SETON HOSP
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
SUSAN WAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
-------
Table 111-3-61
I
o
TOLUENE - C9H5CH3 (METHYL BENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
SITE
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLET SETON HOSP
PORT RICHHOHO PO
PS 26
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
TOTTENVILLE
PUMPING STATION
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
ARITH. MEAN
70
19
71
74
22
2.83
1.88
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
CARTERET
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
PISCATAWAY
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
5.67
5.19
4.65
4.24
3.20
2.32
1.70
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
BAYLEV SETON HOSP
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
PI SCATAWAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
3.01
2.90
2.86
2.71
2.67
2.65
2.17
1.46
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PUMPING STATION
PI SCATAWAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
5.24
5.02
4.18
4.14
3.68
3.63
3.29
2.07
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
SITE
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
DONGAN HILLS
PORT RICHMOND PO
ELTINGVILLE
PUMPING STATION
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PS 26
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PI SCATAWAY
SEUAREN
ARITH. MEAN
Cppb)
4.59
4.18
4.09
3.56
3.55
3.52
3.48
3.21
2.78
2.56
1.76
SITE
CARTERET
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
DONGAN HILLS
PUMPING STATION
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
ELTINGVILLE
PISCATAUAY
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
SUSAN UAGNER HS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
5.57
4.72
4.55
4.46
4.26
4.23
4.14
3.60
3.42
3.34
3.27
3.16
3.13
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
PS 26
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
DONGAN HILLS
GREAT KILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELTINGVILLE
PISCATAUAY
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
4.36
3.49
3.38
2.83
2.82
2.59
2.58
2.39
2.17
2.13
2.05
1.95
1.27
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
ELTINGVILLE
TOTTENVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
GREAT KILLS
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
SUSAN UAGNER HS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PISCATAUAY
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
4.39
4.32
4.17
3.09
3.09
2.99
2.95
2.90
2.82
2.69
2.57
2.22
1.80
-------
Table III-3-62
O-XYLENE - 1.2"jC8H4 (1.2-DIMETHYL BENZENE)
QUARTER SEGINHIHG
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PS 26
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
SUSAN UAGNER HS
CARTERET
PUMPING STATION
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PI SCAT AWAY
SEUAREN
0.81
0.63
0.61
0.53
0.53
0.33
0.33
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
OONGAN HILLS
PS 26
ELTINGVILLE
SUSAN UAGNER HS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
CARTERET
PUMPING STATION
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
0
PUMPING STATION
PS 26
TOTTENVILLE
ELIZABETH
PISCATAUAY
GREAT KILLS
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SEUAREN
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ARITH. MEAN
(PPM
0.53
0.49
0.46
0.34
0.34
0.33
0.33
0.29
0.28
0.27
0.25
0.24
0.23
-------
labVe Ul-3-63
m&p-XVLENES - 1.3-(CH3)2C6H4 & 1.4-(CH3)2CeH4 (1,3-DIHETHYL BENZENE I 1.4-D1METHYL BENZENE)
I
ro
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
CARTERET
PUHPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
PISCATAUAY
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
GREAT KILLS
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
2.45 PORT RICHMOND PO
1.80 DONGAN HILLS
1.29 ELTINGVILLE
0.87 BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
CARTERET
PUMPING STATION
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PI SCATAWAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
PUMPING STATION.
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
2.59
2.06
2.00
1.61
59
54
30
22
20
0.93
0.78
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
PORT RICHMOND PO
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PUMPING STATION
PS 26
CARTERET
GREAT KILLS
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN UAGNER HS
PISCATAUAY
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
2.66
2.38
2.02
1.94
1.50
1.19
0.57
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SUSAN UAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
PUMPING STATION
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
2.47
1.93
1.87
1.67
1.64
1.61
1.55
1.39
1.34
1.34
1.22
1.17
0.81
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
DONGAN HILLS
PS 26
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SUSAN UAGNER HS
ELTINGVILLE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEUAREN
PISCATAUAY
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
1.61 DONGAN HILLS
1.38 BAYLEY SETON HOSP
1.38 ELTINGVILLE-
1.33 PORT RICHMOND PO
0.92 ELIZABETH
0.86 PS 26
0.83 CARTERET
0.70 SUSAN UAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
PUMPING STATION
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
1.89 PORT RICHMOND PO
1.53 PUMPING STATION
1.30 PS 26
1.27 TOTTENVILLE
1.17 GREAT KILLS
1.13 SUSAN UAGNER HS
0.89 ELIZABETH
0.88 SEUAREN
0.77 CARTERET
0.76 PISCATAUAY
0.49 BAYLEY SETON HOSP
0.48 ELTINGVILLE
0.25 DONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
2.31
2.14
1.88
1.83
1.71
1.55
1.51
0.83
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
-------
Table 11[-3-64
STtRENE - C,HSCK=CH2 (VINYL BENZENE)
I
U)
SITE
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
SEWAREN
PISCATAUAY
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETOH HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
0
GREAT KILLS
TOTTEMVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PIMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.07
0.06
0.05
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
&OHGAH HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PI SCAT AWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
0.07 BAYLEY SETON KOSP
0.07 DONGAN HILLS
0.06 ELTINCVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENV1LLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
ARITH. MEAN
(Pf*>
0.12
0.09
0.09
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BArLET SETON HOSP
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEUAftEN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
0.11 BAYLEY SETON HOSP
0.09 DOKGAN HILLS
O.OB ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREK
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
0.05 ELTINGVILLE
0.05 DONGAN HILLS
0.03 BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN UAGNER HS
SEUAREH
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
0.08
0.08
0.07
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. ME * OF
(ppb) SAMPLES
0.06
0.06
0.05
-------
Table 111-3-65
ETHYL BENZENE - CBH5CH2CH3
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. HEAN
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SEWAREN
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PISCATAWAY
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
0.53
0.34
0.19
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
CARTERET
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
1.49
1.25
0.92
0.59
0.36
0.24
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
PI SCAT AWAY
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
CARTERET
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
0.53
0.46
0.45
0.27
0.18
0.11
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN WAGNER HS
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
TOTTENVILLE
CARTERET
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.67
0.62
0.56
0.41
0.34
0.15
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEV SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
0.72
0.57
0.57
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
0.71
0.55
0.49
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. HEAN
0.34
0.33
0.24
SITE
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PI SCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
0.39
0.33
0.28
-------
Table 111-3-66
CHLOROBENZENE - C,H5Cl (PHENYLCHLOR1DE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN UAGNER HS
DONGAN HILLS
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SEUAREN
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
ELIZABETH
PISCATAUAY
0.02
O.OA
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
SUSAN UAGNER HS
ELTINGVILLE
BAUET SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
TOTTENVILLE
GREAT KILLS
PISCATAUAY
SEUAREN
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
(ppb) SITE
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
0.02
0.01
0.01
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DOHGAU HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PI SCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
0.01
0.01
0.01
-------
Table Ul-3-67
X
o-DICHLOROBENZENE - 1,2-Cl2CeH4 (1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
SITE
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
SUSAN WAGNER HS 0.02
PS 26 0.02
PORT RICHMOND PO 0.02
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
PISCATAWAY
SEUAREN
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
PISCATAWAY
SEWAREN
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
0.02
0.02
0.02
SITE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
PISCATAWAY
SEUAREN
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAVLEV SETON HOSP
ELTINGVIUE
OONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
0.02 SUSAN WAGNER HS
0.02 PS 26
0.02 PORT RICHMOND PO
PI SCATAWAY
CARTERET
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEV SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb)
0.02
0.02
0.01
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
0.01 BAYLEY SETON HOSP
0.01 DONGAN HILLS
0.01 ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.01
0.01
0.01
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
0.01
0.01
0.01
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.01
0.01
0.01
-------
Table 111-5-68
m-DICHLOROBENZENE - 1.3-Cl2CaH4 (1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
I
SITE
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER MS
SEUAREN
CARTERET
PI SCATAWAY
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETOH HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
ARtTH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.06
0.06
0.03
SITE
PORT RICHHOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
CARTERET
SEUAREtl
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETOH HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAM HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.07
0.04
0.04
SITE
PORT RICHHOND PO
SUSAM VAGUER HS
PS 26.
PISCATAUAY
CARTERET
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTEKVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAM HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.06
0.03
0.03
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS Z6
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PISCATAUAY
CARTERET
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAM HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.09
0.07
0.05
SITE
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
0.01 DONGAN HILLS
0.01 ETINGVILLE
0.01 BAYLEY SETOH HOSP
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PIMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
0.08 BAYLEY SETON HOSP
•0.08 DONGAN HILLS
0.07 ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
0.01
0.01
0.01
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAUAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAK WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
(PPb)
0.01
0.01
0.01
-------
Table 111-3-69
p-DlCHLOROBENZENE - 1,4-Cl2CeH« (1.4-DlCHLOROBENZENE)
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1987
SITE
PORT RICHMOND PO
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
SEUAREN
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
PISCATAWAY
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb>
0.01
0.01
0.01
SITE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PS 26
PORT RICHMOND PO
CARTERET
ELIZABETH
PI SCATAWAY
SEUAREN
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(Ppb)
0.01
0.01
0.01
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
CARTERET
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
0.01
0.01
0.01
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1988
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
SUSAN WAGNER HS
PORT RICHMOND PO
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
CARTERET
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
PUMPING STATION
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
ELTINGVILLE
DONGAN HILLS
0.01
0.01
0.01
SITE
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
BAVLEY SETON HOSP
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
QUARTER BEGINNING
OCTOBER 1988
ARITH. MEAN
(ppb) SITE
QUARTER BEGINNING
JANUARY 1989
0.19
0.18
0.17
ARITH. MEAN
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
0.15
0.15
0.15
QUARTER BEGINNING
APRIL 1989
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
0.17
0.17
0.16
QUARTER BEGINNING
JULY 1989
ARITH. MEAN
SITE
BAYLEY SETON HOSP
DONGAN HILLS
ELTINGVILLE
PORT RICHMOND PO
GREAT KILLS
TOTTENVILLE
PS 26
PISCATAWAY
PUMPING STATION
CARTERET
SUSAN WAGNER HS
SEWAREN
ELIZABETH
0.15
0.15
0.15
-------
EMISSION INVENTORY APPENDICES
A-69
-------
Emission Inventory and Microinventory Tables and Maps
Point source emission inventory
by chemical
Area and mobile source emissions
summary
Area and mobile source emissions
inventory
Microinventory
Emissions mapping maps and
tables
Tables III-5-4 through 18
Table III-5-19
Emissions Inventory
Appendices A through E
Figures III-5-5 through 19,
Tables III-5-20 through 33
Figures III-5-20 through 30,
Tables III-5-34 through 40
A-70
-------
Point Source Emission Inventories
Tables III-5-4 through 18
This section contains the point source emission inventories
presented as separate tables for the following chemicals:
benzene
cadmium and compounds
carbon tetrachloride (tetrachloromethane)
chloroform (trichloromethane)
dichloromethane (methylene chloride)
formaldehyde
n-hexane
perchloroethylene (tetrachloroethylene,
tetrachloroethene)
toluene
1,1,1-trichloroethane
trichloroethylene (1,1,2-trichloroethene)
xylenes (mixed)
m-xylene
o-xylene
E-xylene
A-71
-------
Table HI -5-4: Benzene point source inventory
FACILITY NAME
AKZO CHEMICALS INC.
AMERADA HESS CORP
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP.
BLOCK DRUG COMPANY. INC.
BOROUGH OF CARTERET POTU
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 1
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 2
CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC.
CITY OF BAYONNE POTU
CITY OF ELIZABETH POTU
CITY OF HOBOKEN POTU
CITY OF LINDEN POTU
CITY OF NEU BRUNSWICK POTU
CITY OF ORANGE DPU POTU
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POTU
EXXON BAYUAY REFINERY
FORD MOTOR CO
GATX TERMINALS CORP.
GENERAL MOTORS CORP. CPC GROUP
GETTY PETROLEUM CORP.
HERCULES INCORPORATED
HULS AMERICA. INC. (EX-NUODEX)
JAMESBURG SCHOOL FOR BOYS POTU
JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX-UNION POTU
KIN-BUC. INC. (LANDFILL)
LINDEN ROSELLE POTU
LINPRO COMPANY POTU. THE
MAR I SOL INC. CHEM. DIV.
MERCK & CO
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 1
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 2
NEWPORT CITY DEVELOPMENT CO
STREET ADDRESS
MEADOW ROAD
750 CLIFF RD
567 RIDGE ROAD
257 CORNEL 1 SON AVE
399 ROOSEVELT AVE
SUMMIT AVENUE
1200 STATE STREET
630 AVE C
94 WASHINGTON STREET
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
260 HIGH STREET
1400 PARK AVE
939 U.S. RTE. «1
78 LAFAYETTE STREET
1016 WEST EDGAR RD
RT 36 & AVENUE D
MINISINK & CHEESEQUAKE RD
830 MAGNOLIA AVENUE
500 SOUTH FIRST STREET
MEADOW ROAD
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
125 FACTORY LANE
126 EAST LINCOLN AVE
CHEVALIER AVE
145 12TH STREET
CITY
EDISON
PORT READING
MONMOUTH JCT.
JERSEY CITY
CAR1ERET
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
PERTH AMBOY
BAYONNE
ELIZABETH
HOBOKEN
LINDEN
NEW BRUNSWICK
ORANGE
PERTH AMBOY
LINDEN
EDISON
CARTERET
LINDEN
ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS
SAYREVILLE
ELIZABETH
ELIZABETH
EDISON
LINDEN
MIDDLESEX
RAHWAY
SAYREVILLE
JERSEY CITY
ZIP
CODE
08817
07064
08852
07302
07008
07922
08861
07002
07207
07030
07036
08903
07051
08861
07036
08818
07008
07036
07716
08872
07201
07202
08817
07036
08846
07065
08872
07372
UTH
NORTHING
4482.1
4490.0
4468.8
4467.0
4491.6
4479.3
4480.5
4504.0
4488.5
4499.7
4503.1
4511.5
4505.3
4482.9
4510.8
4483.1
4497.9
4485.2
4492.7
4496.2
4477.5
4501.8
4465.0
4498.4
4481.2
4495.0
4464.0
4489.9
4495.7
4481.0
4483.0
4508.9
FACILITY1"
UIDE
UTH EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
552.2
564.0
536.1
543.0
566.7
563.2
560.0
547.0
561.9
574.8
568.3
583.0
563.4
543.8
563.3
561.1
567.4
553.2
566.7
562.8
555.6
567.3
552.0
567.9
552.5
567.1
533.2
540.9
562.4
563.3
550.8
581.3
1.53
2.90
0.03
0.30
0.14
0.21
0.18
0.10
0.16
0.06
0.05
25.00
0.25
0.25
5.13
8.45
0.89
2.13
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY? (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
20.28
0.04
0.28
0.68
0.05
0.26
0.88
5.09
0.02
0.03
29.42
0.11
0
0
0
1
0
18
2
0
0
22
0
.77
.06
.03
ND1
ND
ND
.26
.04
.28
.92
.18
.25
.53
.02
A T
T
A
A
E P
E
E
A
T
E
E '
E
E
T
T
A
T
A
A
A
E
E
A
E P
E
A E
A T
E P
E P
A
1.53
2.90
0.04
0.28
0.03
0.06
0.03
0.68
0.30
0.14
0.21
0.18
0.10
0.16
0.06
0.05
25.00
0.25
0.05
0.25
0.26
0.88
5.09
0.04
18.28
0.02
5.13
0.18
0.03
8.45
0.89
2.13
0.11
1 ND means no data fro* which air emissions could be estimated.
A APEDS 12/28/89 - permit-allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY HIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313). the NYSOEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A * APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTU Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table II 1-5-4; Benzene point source inventory (continued)
FACILITY NAME
OLD BRIDGE HUA BROUN TOUN POTU
OLD BRIDGE POTU
ORB IS PRODUCTS CORPORATION
PERK CHEMICAL CO., INC.
RAHUAY VALLEY SA POTW
SHELL OIL COMPANY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
SOLVENTS RECOVERY SERVICE OF M
SOMERSET- RAH 1 TAN VALLEY POTU
SOUTH AMBOY POTU
SPENCER KELLOGG PRODUCTS
TOUN OF KEARNY POTW
TOWN OF LIVINGSTON POTU
TOUN SHIP OF BERKELEY HGHTS UPC POTU
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH ORANGE VILLAGE
TOWNSHIP OF UOOOBRIDGE POTU 1
TOUMSHIP OF UOODBRIDGE POTU 2
TROY CHEMICAL CORPORATION
UESTGATE TUO DEVELOPERS INC (UNDF)
RED HOOK POTU
T
LJ
STREET ADDRESS
OLD UATER WORKS ROAD
55 VIRGINIA STREET
1050 EAST HAZELUOOO AVE
1300 ROUTE 27
111 STATE STREET
POLHEMUS AVE
400 DORENUS AVE
39 CENTRAL AVE
WALTON AVE. PUMPING STA.
CLIFF ROAD
\ HMN STREET
ONE AVENUE I
RAHUAY ROAD
MARSHALL ST/UTTLE ST
CITY
OLD BRIDGE
NEUARK
ELIZABETH
RAHUAY
NORTH BRJNSU)CK
SEUAREN
LINDEN
BRIDGEUATER
SOUTH AMBOY
MEUARK
KEARNY
LIVINGSTON
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
SOUTH ORANGE
SEUAREN
UOODBRIDGE
MEUARK
EDISON
BROOKLYN
ZSP UTH
CODE NORTHING
08857
07114
07207
07065
08902
07077
07036
OB807
08879
07105
07032
07039
07922
07079
07077
07095
07105
08818
4472.1
4478.6
4504.2
4499.8
4492.8
4480.7
4487.8
4496.0
4489.0
4481.0
4507.5
4507.2
4517.7
4503.4
4510.0
4489.2
4484.6
4507.3
4494.0
4506.4
FACILITY
UIDE
UTH EH1SSSOMS
EASTING (TPY)
558.
564.
567.
568.
566.
543.
562.
563.
536.
8
9
2
5
9
a
8
2
6
0
0
1
0
.04
.28
.50
.11
560.0
573.
574.
555.
546.
561.
563.
558.
570.
552.
586.
9
9
&
6
7
5
9
2
7
3
0
0
.05
.03
0.03
0
0
.01
.31
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEOS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
{TPY} (TPY) SOURCE5 (TPY)
0
0
13.14
0
7
0.09
0
0
1.10
0
0.02
1
0
1.31
0.20
.09 E
.25 E P
A
.03 t.
.42 t P
A
T
.19 t
T
.27 6
A
T
T
.49 e
A
.34 e P
.32 E P
A
A
P
0.09
0.04
13.14
0.03
0.28
0.09
1.50
0.19
0.11
0.27
1.10
0.05
0.05
0.49
0.02
0.03
0.01
1.31
0.20
0.31
93.08
1 ND means no data from uhich air emissions could be estimated.
A APEDS 12/28/89 - permit-allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY UIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region 11 POTU Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
>
*•
Table 1 11-5-5: Cadmium and cadmium
FACILITY NAME
AKZO CHEMICALS INC.
FRANKLIN PLASTICS
GENERAL COLOR CO. INC.
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES
METZ METALLURGICAL CORP.
OKONITE COMPANY, THE
PLASTICS COLOR CHIP INC
PREM1UN PLASTICS, INC.
PROLERIZEO SCHIABO NEU COMPANY
RARITAN RIVER STEEL COMPANY
ABGUS DIVISION
compounds point source inventory
STREET ADDRESS CITY
500 JERSEY AVE.
113 PASSAIC AVE.
24 AVENUE B
800 ROSE LANE
3900 S. CLINTON AVE.
US ROUTE 1
2 CAMPUS COURT
300 RYDERS LANE
FOOT OF LINDEN AVENUE
MARKET AND ELM STREETS
633 COURT STREET
NEU BRUNSWICK
KEARNY
NEWARK
UNION BEACH
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
NORTH BRUNSWICK
SOMERSET
EAST BRUNSWICK
JERSEY CITY
PERTH AMBOY
BROOKLYN
ZIP
CODE
08903
07032
071 U
07735
07080
08902
08875
08816
07303
08861
11231
UTH
NORTHING
4480.9
4511.8
4505.4
4477.1
4484.5
4477.9
4483.4
4475.5
4504.4
4484.3
4502.7
FACILITY^ UATAP
WIDE ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
UTM EMISSIONSr1h3VH1D.C4
-------
T
^J
Ul
Table 111-5-6: Carbon tetrachloride ooint source inventory FACILITY
FACILITY NAME
AKZO CHEMICALS IMC
BOROUGH OF CARTERS! POIU
BOROUGH OF SATREV1LLE POTW 1
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 2
CUT OF BAYDKNE POTU
CUT OF ELIZABETH POTW
CITY OF HOBOKEH POTU
CITY OF LINDEN POTW
CITY OF NEW BRUNSUICK POTU
CITY OF ORANGE OPH POTU
CITY OF PERTH AH60Y POTW
EXKOH BAYUAY REFINERY
HERCULES, INC.
IHTERNAT10HAL FLAVORS ft FRAGRANCES
JAMESBURG SCHOOL FOR BOYS POTU
JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX-UNION POTU
LINDEN ROSELLE POTU
L1NPRO COMPANY POTU, THE
NARISOL INC. CHEH. OIV.
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 1
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 2
OKONITE COMPANY, THE
OLD BRIDGE HUA BROUNTOUN POTW
OLD BRIDGE POTU
RAHUAY VALLEY SA POTU
SOUTH ANBOY POTU
TOWN OF KEARNY POTU
TOUH OF LIVINGSTON POTU
TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY HGHTS WPC POTU
TOWNSHIP OF UOODBRIDGE POTU 1
TOWNSHIP OF WOOOBR1DGE POTU 2
NEUTOUN CREEK POTW
RED HOOK POTU
STREET ADDRESS
HEADOU ROAD
399 ROOSEVELT AVE
610 AVE C
94 WASHINGTON STREET
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
260 HIGH STREET
1400 PARK AVE.
SOUTH MINN1SINK AVE.
fiOO ROSE LAME
500 SOUTH FIRST STREET
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
125 FACTORY LANE
CHEVAUES AVE
ROUTE 1
OLD WATER WORKS ROAD
1050 EAST HAZELWOOD AVE
39 CENTRAL AVE
CLIFF ROAD
t MAIN STREET
329-69 GREENPOINT AVE
MARSHALL ST/LITTLE ST
CIT*
EDISON
CARTERET
BAYONHE
ELIZABETH
H080KEM
LINDEN
NEW BRUNSWICK
ORANGE
PERTH AHBOY
LINDEN
PARLIN
UNION BEACH
ELIZABETH
LINDEN
MIDDLESEX
SAYREVILLE
NORTH BRUNSUICK
OLD BRIDGE
RAHUAY
SOUTH AHBOY
KEARNY
LIVINGSTON
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
SEUAREH
UOCOBRIOGE
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
ZIP UTM
CODE NORTHING
0681 7
07008
07002
07207
07030
07036
08903
07051
08861
07036
06859
07735
07202
07036
08846
08872
08902
08857
07065
08879
07032
07039
07922
07077
07095
4482.1
4491 .6
4479.3
4480.5
4499.7
4503.1
4511.5
4505.3
4482.9
4510.8
4483.1
4497.9
4477.4
4477.1
4465.0
4498.4
4495.0
4464.0
4489.9
4481.0
4483.0
4477.9
4472.1
4478.6
4492.8
4481.0
4507.2
4517.7
4503.4
4489.2
4484.6
4509.0
4506.4
UTH
EAST1HG
552.2
566.7
563.2
560.0
574. B
568.3
583.0
563.4
543.8
563.3
561.1
567.4
556.2
571 .8
552.0
567.9
567.1
533.2
540.9
563.3
550.8
543.6
558.8
564.9
566.9
560.0
574.9
555.6
546.6
563.5
558.9
587.3
586.3
UMAP
UIDE ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
EMISSIONS APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY) (TPlfJ (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY>
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0,
0.
1.
447.
0.02
01
04
06
05
03
05
02
02
05 0.02
74 296.20
0.44
0.01
0.27
1.23
0.45
0.04
0.02
NO1
NO
NO
0.73
0.02
10.58
1.69
0.10
13.04
0.01
A
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
A
A
A
E
E
E
E
A
E
E
0.25
0.01
0.05
0.14
4.29
0.15
E
E
E
E
0.02
0.01
0.01
0
1
0
.00
.08
.09
0.28
0.77
0.19
E
E
E
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
T
T
P
P
T
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
0.02
0.01
0.04
0.02
0.04
0.06
O.OS
0.03
0.05
0.02
0.02
1.05
447.74
0.44
0.02
10.58
1.69
0.10
0.01
0.27
1.23
0.25
0.05
0.01
4.29
0.15
0.02
0.01
0.28
0.01
0.00
1.08
0.09
469.73
"NO" means no data from which air emissions could be estimated.
APEDS 12/28/89 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredth* of a ton).
F FACILITY UIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313). the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region tl POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table 111-5-7: Chloroform point source inventory
FACILITY NAME
AKZO CHEMICALS INC.
ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC.
BOROUGH OF CARTERET POTU
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 1
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 2
C1BA-GEICY CORP
CITY OF BAYONNE POTU
CITY OF ELIZABETH POTU
CITY OF HOBOKEN POTU
CITY OF LINDEN POTU
CITY OF NEU BRUNSWICK POTU
CITY OF ORANGE CPU POTU
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POTU
GORDON TERMINAL SERVICE CO.
JAMESBURG SCHOOL FOR BOYS POTU
JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX-UNION POTU
LINDEN ROSELLE POTU
LINPRO COMPANY POTU. THE
MAR1SOL INC. CHEM. DIV.
MERCK ( CO
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 1
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 2
OLD BRIDGE HUA BROUNTOUN POTU
OLD BRIDGE POTU
P.O. OIL t CHEMICAL STORAGE, INC.
RAHUAY VALLEY SA POTU
SCHERING CORP
SOMERSET -RARI TAN VALLEY POTU
SOUTH AMBOY POTU
TOWN OF KEARNY POTU
STREET ADDRESS
MEADOU ROAD
10 NORTH AVE. EAST
399 ROOSEVELT AVE
556 MORRIS AVE
630 AVE C
94 WASHINGTON STREET
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
260 HIGH STREET
FOOT OF HOOK ROAD
500 SOUTH FIRST STREET
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
125 FACTORY LANE
126 EAST LINCOLN AVE
CHEVALIER AVE
OLD UATER WORKS ROAD
FOOT OF EAST 22ND STREET
1050 EAST HAZELWOOO AVE
1011 MORRIS AVE
POLHEHUS AVE
39 CENTRAL AVE
CITY
EDISON
ELIZABETH
CARTERET
SUMMIT
BAYONNE
ELIZABETH
HOBOKEN
LINDEN
NEW BRUNSWICK
ORANGE
PERTH AMBOY
BAYONNE
ELIZABETH
LINDEN
MIDDLESEX
RAHWAY
SAYREVILLE
OLD BRIDGE
BAYONNE
RAHWAY
UNION
BRIDGEWATER
SOUTH AMBOY
KEARNY
ZIP
CODE
08817
07201
07008
07901
07002
07207
07030
07036
08903
07051
08861
07002
07202
07036
08846
07065
08872
08857
07002
07065
07083
08807
08879
07032
UTM
NORTHING
4482.1
4501.3
4491.6
4479.3
4480.5
4507.9
4499.7
4503.1
4511.5
4505.3
4482.9
4510.8
4483.1
4500.6
4465.0
4498.4
4495.0
4464.0
4489.9
4495.7
4481.0
4483.0
4472.1
4478.6
4500.9
4492.8
4505.1
4489.0
4481.0
4507.2
FACILITYF
WIDE
UTM EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
552.2
570.2
566.7
563.2
560.0
553.3
574.8
568.3
583.0
563.4
543.8
563.3
561.1
576.2
552.0
567.9
567.1
533.2
540.9
562.4
563.3
550.8
558.8
564.9
575.9
566.9
561.3
536.6
560.0
574.9
4.00
0.02
0.11
0.16
0.14
0.08
0.12
0.05
0.04
1.50
0.06
0.69
0.63
0.03
0.05
0.27
0.04
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDSA SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY) (TPY) SOURCE3 (TPY)
2.75
1.30
0
0
0
1.15
0
2.53
0
5
0
0
0.02
0.08
6
0
0
0
6.57
2
0.07
0
.23
.02
.01
NO1
ND
ND
.37
.01
.42
.87
.05
.67
.00
.03
.07
.20
.08
A
A
E
E
E
A
E
E
E
E
A
E
E
E
E
A
A
E
E
E
E
A
E
A
E
T
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
2.75
4.00
0.02
0.02
0.01
1.15
0.11
0.16
0.14
0.08
0.12
0.05
0.04
2.53
0.01
1.50
0.06
0.05
0.02
0.08
0.69
0.63
0.03
0.03
6.57
0.05
0.07
0.27
0.08
0.04
1 "NO" means no data from which air emissions could be estimated.
A APEDS 12/28/89 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY UIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTU Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table 1H-5-7; Chloroform point source inventory (continued)
FACILITY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
CITY
ZIP UTM
COPE MOUTHING
TOWN OF LIVINGSTON POTU
TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY HGHTS WPC
TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE POTW 1
TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE POTW 2
NEWTOWN CREEK POTW
OAKWOOD BEACH POTW
OWLS HEAD POTW
PORT RICHMOND POTW
RED HOOK POTW
POTW
CLIFF ROAD
1 MAIN STREET
329-69 GREENPOINT AVE
EMMET AVE/MILL ROAD
BAY RIDGE AVE/THE NARROWS
1801 RICHMOND TERRACE
MARSHALL ST/LITTLE ST
LIVINGSTON
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
SEWAREN
WOODBRIDGE
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
BROOKLYN
07039 4517.
07922 4503.
07077 4489.
07095 4484.
4509.
4468.
4498.
4499.
4506.
UTM
EASTING
FACILITY1"
WIDE
EMISSIONS
(TPY)
555.6
546.6
563.5
558.9
587.3
574.1
581.6
573.8
586.3
ENGINEERING
SCIENCE
(TPY)
SOURCE"
0.03
0.02
0.01
2.72
0.22
0.09
0.39
0.24
0.14
0.40
0.10
P
E
E P
E P
P
P
P
P
P
UATAP
EMISSIONS
INVENTORY
(TPY)
0.03
0.14
0.02
0.01
2.72
0.22
0.09
0.39
0.24
25.22
r
1 MND" means no data from which air emissions could be estimated.
A APEDS 12/28/89 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
f FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313). the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTU Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table U1-5-B: Dichloromethane ooint source inventory
FACILITY NAME
A C COMPACTING PRESSES, INC.
MCZO CHEMICALS INC.
ALLIED SIGNAL INC.
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP.
BANKS BROTHERS INC.
BEECHAM LABORATORIES
BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES
BOROUGH OF CARTERET POTU
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 1
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 2
CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY
CIBA-GEIGY CORP
CITY OF BAYONNE POTU
CITY OF ELIZABETH POTU
p. CITY OF HOBOKEN POTU
1 CITY OF LINDEN POTU
2o CITY OF NEU BRUNSWICK POTU
CITY OF ORANGE DPU POTU
CITY OF PERTH AHBOY POTU
CPS CHEMICAL CORP, INC
CROWN METAL FINISHING CO. INC.
DELEET MERCHANDISING CORP
DRIVER HARRIS ALLOYS INC
E 1 DUPONT DE NEMOURS & CO
EASTERN STEEL BARREL CORP
ECOLAB, INC.
ESSEX SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC.
(ESSEX CHEMICAL CORP.)
EXXON BAYWAY REFINERY
E.R. SQUIBB & SONS
FMC CORPORATION
FORD MOTOR CO
STREET ADDRESS
1577 LIVINGSTON AVENUE
HEADOU ROAD
10 NORTH AVE EAST
567 RIDGE ROAD
24 FEDERAL PLAZA
101 POSSUMTOUN RD
600 MOUNTAIN AVENUE
399 ROOSEVELT AVE
SUMMIT AVENUE
556 MORRIS AVE
630 AVE C
94 WASHINGTON STREET
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
260 HIGH STREET
OLD WATERWORKS RD
40 BORIGHT AVE
26 BLANCHARD ST
308 MIDDLESEX STREET
CHEESEOUAKE ROAD
4100 NEU BRUNSWICK AVE
255 BLAIR ROAD
1 CROSSMAN RD SOUTH
1400 PARK AVE
1 SQUIBB DRIVE
PLAINSBORO ROAD
939 US ROUTE 1
CITY
NORTH BRUNSUICK
EDISON
ELIZABETH
MONMOUTH JCT.
BLOOMFIELD
PISCATAUAY
NEU PROVIDENCE
CARTERET
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
SUMMIT
BAYONNE
ELIZABETH
HOBOKEN
LINDEN
NEU BRUNSUICK
ORANGE
PERTH AMBOY
OLD BRIDGE
KEN1LUORTH
NEUARK
HARRISON
SAYREVILLE
PISCATAUAY
UOODBRIDGE TUP.
SAYREVILLE
LINDEN
NORTH BRUNSWICK
PLAINSBORO TUP.
EDISON
ZIP UTM
CODE NORTHING
08902
08817
07201
08852
07003
08854
07974
07008
07922
07901
07002
07207
07030
07036
08903
07051
08861
08857
07033
07105
07029
08872
08854
07095
08872
07036
08902
08536
08818
4478.2
4482.1
4501.3
4468.8
4517.3
4489.4
4503.6
4491.6
4479.3
4480.5
4504.0
4507.9
4499.7
4503.1
4511.5
4505.3
4482.9
4510.8
4483.1
4475.7
4503.1
4508.9
4509.8
4478.8
4487.6
4491.8
4480.5
4497.9
4480.1
4465.1
4485.2
FACIL1TYF
U1DE
UTM EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
544.0
552.2
570.2
536.1
568.7
543.6
550.7
566.7
563.2
560.0
547.0
553.3
574.8
568.3
583.0
563.4
543.8
563.3
561.1
557.2
559.0
572.2
571.3
556.7
547.3
562.7
557.3
567.4
547.0
531.9
553.2
2.58
36.30
14.49
0.95
5.66
4.18
6.31
5.45
3.03
4.79
1.99
1.56
2.35
30.24
0.47
9.00
4.59
0.13
0.35
12.05
8.63
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDSA SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPT) (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
0.58
1.08
4.81
1.26
65.18
0.01
0.44
117.56
2.67
26.39
0.07
0.80
8.92
1.14
A
A
A
A
A
A
2.05 E P
0.17 E
0.07 E
A
A
P
ND1 E P
P
ND E P
ND E P
P
3.34 E P
A
A
A
A
A
A
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
0.58
1.08
2.58
1.26
36.30
14.49
0.01
0.95
0.17
0.07
0.44
5.66
4.18
6.31
5.45
3.03
4.79
1.99
1.56
2.35
30.24
0.47
9.00
4.59
0.13
0.07
0.80
0.35
12.05
1.14
8.63
1 "NDM means no data from which air emissions could be estimated.
A APEDS 12/28/89 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
f FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; € = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTU Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table IU-5-8: Dichloromethane point source inventory (continued)
FACILITY HAKE
GENERAL MOTORS CORP. CPC GROUP
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES
JAHESBURG SCHOOL FOR BOYS POTU
JOHN 6 MOORE CORPORATION
JOHNSON I JOHNSON CO 1KCU.S.
JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX-UNION POTU
KERN FOAM PRODUCTS CORP
ION-BUG, INC.
L C P CHEMICALS • NEW JERSEY INC.
LINDEN ROSELLE POTW
LINPRO COMPANY POTW, THE
MAR 1 SOL INC. CHEN. OIV.
MERCK I CO
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 1 (#15669)
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTW 2
MOHAWK LABORATORIES OF NJ
MON-ECO INDUSTRIES INC
NEW YORK BRONZE POWDER CO. INC.
NEWARK INDUSTRIAL SPRAYING INC.
> NUTRO LABORATORIES IMC
1 OAKITE PRODUCTS INC
VO OLD BRIDGE HUA BROWNTOWN POTW
OLD BRIDGE POTU
PDI BUSINESS UNIT OF ICI AMERICAS
(PIGMENT DISPERSIONS, INC.)
PRIVATE FORMULATIONS, INC.
RAHUAY VALLEY SA POTW
RONA PEARL
SCHERING CORP
SOMERSET-RARITAN VALLEY POTW
SOUTH AKBOY POTW
TETLEY IMC
TOWN OF KEARNY POTW
STREET ADDRESS
1016 WEST EDGAR RD
BOO ROSE LANE
ROUTE 9 AT PARKWAY
ROUTE 1 & AARON ROAD
500 SOUTH FIRST STREET
1253 NEWMARK AVE
MEADOW ROAD
FOOT OF SOUTH WOOD AVE.
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
125 FACTORY LANE
126 EAST LINCOLN AVE
CHEVALIER AVE
STOUTS LANE
5 JOANNA CT
515-519 DOUD AVENUE
12 AMSTERDAM STREET
650 SOUTH PLAIHFIELD
700 MIDDLESEX AVE
OLD WATER WORKS ROAD
54 KELLOGG COURT
460 PLAIMFIELD AVENUE
1050 EAST HAZELWOOD AVE
4 HOOK ROAD
1011 MORRIS AVE
POLHEMUS AVE
601 WEST LINDEN AVE
39 CENTRAL AVE
CITY
LINDEN
UNION BEACH
SAYREVILLE
NORTH BRUNSWICK
ELIZABETH
SOUTH PLAIMFIELD
EDISON
LINDEN
LINDEN
MIDDLESEX
RAHWAY
SAYREVILLE
HONHOUTH JUNCTION
EAST BRUNSWICK
ELIZABETH
NEWARK
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
METUCHEN
OLD BRIDGE
EDISON
EDISON
RAHWAY
BAYONNE
UNION
BRIDGEUATER
SOUTH AMBOY
LINDEN
KEARNY
ZIP UTM
CODE NORTHING
07036
07735
08872
08902
07202
07080
08817
07036
07036
08846
07065
08872
08852
05816
07201
07105
07080
08840
08857
08817
08840
07065
07002
07083
08807
08879
07036
07032
4496.2
4477.1
4465.0
4461 .8
4477.5
4498.4
4491 .8
4481.2
4494.7
4495.0
4464.0
4489.9
4495.7
4481.0
4483.0
4469.8
4477.0
4502.3
4501.6
4483.6
4486.7
4472.1
4478.6
4487.5
4485.7
4492.6
4500.5
4505.1
4489.0
4481.0
4495.3
4507.2
FACILITYF
WIDE
UTH EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
562.8
571.8
552.0
559.4
542.5
567.9
548.4
552.5
567.3
567.1
533.2
540.9
562.4
563.3
550.8
536.5
550.4
569.3
570.4
549.7
555.1
558.8
564.9
550.6
549.5
566.9
575.2
561.3
536.6
560.0
564.7
574.9
21.28
0.25
3S.96
0.13
6.17
64.00
27.32
8.21
21.38
0.25
6.00
17.79
0.50
1.15
17.00
0.87
0.25
51.14
1.39
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPYJ (TPY) SOURCE5 (TPY>
0.20
0.24
0.01
1.14
1.09
880.29
0.00
5.98
0.62
19.32
0.
48.
7.
0.
59.
0.
0.
0.
09
66
77
48
96
04
25
65
19.74
140.88
0.71
13.63
1.64
T
T
E
A
A
E P
T
A
A
E P
E
A
A T
A E P
E P
T
A T
A
T
T
T
E
E P
T
A
E P
T
A T
P
E
T
P
21.28
0.25
0.09
0.20
0.24
38.96
0.13
0.01
1.14
6.17
0.48
1.09
64.00
27.32
8.21
21.38
0.25
0.62
6.00
17.79
0.50
0.25
1.15
17.00
19.32
0.87
0.25
51.14
1.39
0.71
13.63
1.64
"NO" means no date from which air emissions could be estimated.
APEDS 12/28/B9 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY WICE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A * APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
>.
T
00
o
Table 111-5-8: Dichlorontethane ooir
FACILITY NAME
TOWN OF LIVINGSTON POTU
TOWNSHIP Or BERKELEY HGHTS UPC POTU
TOWNSHIP OF WOOOBRIDGE POTU 1
TOWNSHIP OF WOOOBRIDGE POTU 2
UNION CARBIDE CORP BOUND BROOK PIT
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
VALSPAR CORP
WILSON IMPERIAL CO
26TH WARD POTU
CONEY ISLAND POTU
OAKUOOO BEACH POTU
OWLS HEAD POTU
INDUSTRIAL FINISHING PRODUCTS
NEWTOWN CREEK POTU
PORT RICHMOND POTU
RASKO
RED HOOK POTU
it source inventory (continued)
STREET ADDRESS CITY
CLIFF ROAD
1 MAIN STREET
1 RIVER ROAD
350 ROOSEVELT AVENUE
347-4 RANO AVE
115 CHESTNUT STREET
HENORIX ST/ JAMAICA BAY
AVE Z/KNAPP ST
EMMET AVE/MILL ROAD
BAY RIDGE AVE /THE NARROWS
465 LOGAN STREET
329-69 GREENPOINT AVE
1801 RICHMOND TERRACE
1704 MCDONALD AVE
MARSHALL ST/UT1LE ST
LIVINGSTON
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
SEUAREN
WOOOBRIDGE
PI SCAT AWAY
CARTERET
SOUTH PLA1NFIELD
NEUARK
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
ZIP
CODE
07039
07922
07077
07095
08854
07008
07080
07105
11208
11230
UTM
NORTHING
4517.7
4503.4
4489.2
4484.6
4488.7
4492.0
4491.1
4508.1
4500.1
4490.6
4488.7
4498.7
4512.9
4509.0
4499.1
4497.4
4506.4
FACILITY^ UATAP
WIDE ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
UTN EMISSIONS APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
EASTING CTPY) (TPY) (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
555
546
563
558
540
566
549
570
595
590
574
581
587
587
573
587
586
.6
.6
.5
.9
.7
.3
.7
.0
.2
.4
.1
.6
.2
.3
.8
.4
.3
1
0
0
0
3
3
3
26
.08
.98
.39
.90
.36
.60
.42
.72
0.
77.
0.
68.
2.
47.
9.
P 1.08
1.30 E
1.30
3.56 E P 0.98
0.87 E P 0.39
3.07 A
1.82 A
37
92
01
88
28
93
T 0.90
1.82
T 3.36
T 3.60
3.42
26.72
0.37
77.92
T 0.01
68.88
2.28
T 47.93
47 P 9.47
1 "NO" means no data from which air emissions could be estimated.
A APEDS 12/28/89 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
734.58
F FACILITY UIOE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table 111-5-9; Formaldehyde point source inventory
I
FACILITY HAME
STREET ADDRESS
ADM CORPORATION
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC.
AKZO CHEMICALS IWC.
CARDOL1TE CORP.
CHEMOS CORPORATION
COSHA1R INC.
DU PONT GRASSELLI PLANT
E I DUPOHT DE NEHOURS & CO
EASTERN STEEL BARREL CORP
ECOLAB, INC.
E.R. SQUIBB & SONS
HAMILTON INDUSTRIES, INC.
(KEARNY INDUSTRIES INC.)
HART PRODUCTS CORP.
HENKEL CORPORATION
HENKEL INC
HOECHST CELANESE CHEKICAL GROUP
HULS AMERICA, INC.
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS t FRAGRANCES
KENRICH PETROCHEMICALS INC
MANVILLE SALES CORP.
METZ METALLURGICAL CORP.
PMC, INC. (SPECIALTIES GROUP)
REICHHOLD CHEMICALS INC.
REVLOM INC.
RHONE-POULENC INC.
SYNRAY CORPORATION
TROY CHEMICAL CORP.
UNION CARBIDE CORP BOUND BROOK PLT
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
UNITED VEIL DYEING & FINISHING CO
WORLD CLASS INTERNATIONAL KITCHENS
AT&T NASSAU METALS
tOO LINCOLN BLVD.
DAYTON-JAMESBURG ROAD
MEADOW ROAD
500 DOREMUS AYE.
225-23S EMMET STREET
200-222 TERMINAL AVENUE
SOUTHWOOD AVE
CHEESEOUAKE ROAD
4100 NEU BRUNSWICK AVE
255 BLAIR ROAD
i sautes DRIVE
2624 HAMILTON SLVD.
173 SUSSEX STREET
FIRST & ESSEX STREETS
1301 JEFFERSON AVENUE
354 DOREMUS AVENUE
830 MAGNOLIA AVE
800 ROSE LANE
HO EAST 22ND STREET
45 STULTS ROAD
3900 SOUTH CLINTON AVE
INDUSTRIAL AVE.
726 ROCKEFELLAR STREET
RT. 27 & TALMADGE RD.
297 JERSEY AVENUE
209 N. MICHIGAN AVENUE
ONE AVENUE L
1 RJVER ROAD
CAKP KILMER
28-50 BQSTU1CK AVENUE
1930 EAST ELIZABETH AVE.
286 RICHMOND VALLEY ROAD
CITY
FACILITY
U1DE
ZIP UTM UTM EMISSIONS
CODE NORTHING EASTING (TPY)
MIDDLESEX
DAYTON
ED I SON
NEWARK
NEUARK
CLARK
LINDEN
SAYREVILLE
PISCATAUAY
UOOOBRIDGE TUP.
NORTH BRUNSWICK
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
08846
08810
08817
07105
07114
07066
07036
00872
06854
07095
08902
07080
4491.0
4467.9
4482.1
4507.6
4507.7
4299.0
4496.1
4478. 8
4467.6
4491.8
4480.1
4489.5
543.0
543.2
552.2
573.7
569.6
599.0
567.3
556.7
547.3
562.7
547.0
548.9
4.03
0.13
0,25
8.64
0.25
0.13
JERSEY CITY
HARRISON
HOBOKEN
NEWARK
ELIZABETH
UNION BEACH
BAYONNE
DAYTON
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
FORDS
ELIZABETH
EDISON TOWNSHIP
NEU BRUNSWICK
KENILUORTH
NEUARK
PISCATAUAY
EDISON
JERSEY CITY
LINDEN
STATEN ISLAND
07302
07029
07030
07105
07201
07735
07002
06810
07080
08863
07202
08817
08903
07033
07105
08854
08818
07305
07036
10309
4507.0
4510.6
4512.7
4507.1
4501.8
4477.1
4500.6
4467.5
4484.5
4484.5
4497.9
4486.1
4481 .8
4503.3
4507.3
4488.7
4484.0
4506.3
4499.9
4480.0
581.0
570.5
581.5
573.9
567.3
571.8
576.3
543.8
548.4
557.2
567.7
551.9
545.9
560.2
570.2
540.7
547.0
577.3
564.9
565.0
0.25
22.93
2.52
0.25
0.68
1.61
0.50
1.28
9.67
0.03
ENGINEERING
APEDS* SCIENCE
0.02
1.63
0.00
1.73
0.46
0.01
5.67
0.01
7.38
0.08
0.54
3.02
1.18
0.62
0.42
1.24
1.22
2.12
0.02
0.16
16.13
0.01
0.1C
0.01
(TPY) SOURCE
UATAP
EMISSIONS
INVENTORY
(TPY)
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
0.02
4.03
0.13
fl.25
0.46
0.01
8.64
5.67
0.25
0.01
0.13
7.38
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
0.25
0.08
0.54
22.93
2.52
0.25
0.62
0.42
0.68
1.61
0.50
2.12
0.02
0.16
1.28
9.67
0,01
a. 10
0.01
0.03
70.76
APEDS 01/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
f FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A - APEDS; f. = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region JI POTU Inventory; S = SNS; T = TRI.
-------
I
to
Table IU-5-VJ: n-Hexane1 point six.
FACILITY NAME
AKZO CHEMICALS INC.
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP.
ARISTECH CHEMICAL CORP
8ORDEH INC
US PACKAGING t, STORAGE CO. INC.
CIBA-GEIGY CORP
CONTINENTAL GROUP INC
COOK'S INDUSTRIAL LUBRICANTS INC
CPS CHEMICAL COMPANY
E I DUPONT OE NEMOURS t CO
EXXON BAYWAY REf INERT
EXXON COMPANY USA
EXXON CORP
GATX TERMINALS CORP.
MERMAN MILLER, INC
H£ftT£L CUTTING TECHNOLOGIES, INC
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS I FRAGRANCES
INTREX CORPORATION
MARINO INDUSTRIES
MERCK t CO
MOBIL CHEMICAL CO (RftO)
NATIONAL PATENT DEVELOPMENT CORP
NATIONAL STARCH t CHEMICAL CORP
SCHERING CORP
SCHERING CORP
SHELL OIL COMPANY
UAL-JER INC
U.A.S. TERMINALS INC.
iree inventory
STREET ADDRESS
MEADOW ROAD
567 RIDGE ROAD
1711 WEST ELIZABETH AVE
930 LINCOLN BLVD
411 UILSON AVENUE
556 MORRIS AVE
24 KILMER ROAD
5 NORTH STILES STREET
OLD WATERWORKS ROAD
CHEESEOUAKE ROAD
1400 PARK AVE
250 EAST 22ND STREET
1900 E LINDEN AVE
78 LAFAYETTE STREET
180 HERROD BLVD
306 SUSSEX STREET
800 ROSE LANE
1000 FIRST STREET
991 t 1001 E LINDEN AVE
126 EAST LINCOLN AVE
RTE. 27 & VINEYARD RD
783 JERSEY AVE
1735 WEST FRONT STREET
ZOOO GALLOPING HILL RD
1011 MORRIS AVE
111 STATE STREET
1053 VALLEY ST
126 PASSA1C STREET
CITY
EDISON
HONMOUTH JCT.
LINDEN
MIDDLESEX
NEWARK
SUMMIT
EDISON
LINDEN
OLD BRIDGE
SAYREVILLE
LINDEN
BATONNE
LINDEN
CARTERET
DAYTON
HARRISON
UNION BEACH
HARRISON
LINDEN
RAHWAY
EDISON
NEW BRUNSWICK
PLAINF1ELD
KENILUORTH
UNION
SEUAREN
UNION TWP
NEWARK
ZIP UTM
CODE NORTHING
08817
08852
07036
08846
07105
07901
08817
07036
08857
08872
07036
07002
07036
07008
08810
07029
07735
07029
07036
07065
08818
08901
07063
07033
07083
07077
07083
07104
4482.1
4468.8
4496.5
4491.2
4508.7
4507.9
4486.6
4299.0
4475.7
4478.8
4497.9
4516.6
4499.5
4492.7
4468.0
4510.3
4477.1
4509.7
4498.6
4495.7
4485.5
4478.3
4492.2
4503.0
4505.1
4487.8
4507.4
4511.9
FACILITYF UATAP
WIDE ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
UTH EMISSIONS APEDSA SCIENCE INVENTORY
EASTING (TPY) (TPY) (TPY) SOURCE5 (TPY)
552.2
536.1
562.2
542.3
572.4
553.3
549.1
599.0
557.2
556.7
567.4
583.8
565.1
566.7
544.5
571.2
571.8
570.6
564.1
562.4
551.5
541.7
545.8
560.3
561.3
562.8
559.7
570.4
0.22
0.48
0.01
8.10
0.48
0.95
71.73
3.63
2.32
2.14
7.98
0.13
5.43
35.87
0.72
42.50
0.32
21.11
0.20
25.48
1.02
0.46
0.44
544.36
0.50
0.64
1.89
0.16
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
0.22
0.48
0.01
8.10
0.48
0.95
71.73
3.63
2.32
2.14
7.98
0.13
5.43
35.87
0.72
42.50
0.32
21.11
0.20
25.48
1.02
0.46
0.44
544,36
0.50
0.64
1.89
0.16
1 n-HEXANE was not on the SARA Section 313 Toxic Chemical List and was not evaluated in ASES.
A APEDS 12/28/89 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
779.27
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table III-S-11: Perchloroethylene
FACILITY NAME
AMERICAN CYANAMID SLF-HAZ
ASARCO INC. SLF
ASHLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY
BAYONNE TERMINALS INC.
BFI OF SOUTH JERSEY SLF
BOROUGH OF CARTERET POTU
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 1
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 2
BOXAL INC.
B&S PACKAGING & STORAGE CO.. INC.
CARTERET BORO SLF
CITIES SERVICE LANDFILL
CITY OF BAYONNE POTU
CITY OF ELIZABETH POTU
CITY OF HOBOKEN POTU
CITY OF LINDEN POTU
CITY OF NEU BRUNSWICK POTU
CITY OF ORANGE DPU POTW
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POTU
COOKSON PIGMENTS INC.
CYCLE CHEM INC.
> DU PONT -WASHINGTON RD. SLF
00 ECOLAB. INC.
W EDGEBORO DISPOSAL SLF
EDISON TOWNSHIP SLF
ELIZABETHTOWN UATER COMPANY
ELIZABETHTOWN UATER COMPANY
ELIZABETHTOWN UATER COMPANY
GLOBAL CORP. SLF
GORDON TERMINAL SERVICE CO.
HEUBACH INC.
HONIG CHEMICAL AND PROCESSING CORP
(Tetrachloroethylene) point source inventory
STREET ADDRESS CITY
4900 TREMLEY POINT
221 FOUNDRY STREET
2ND STREET I HOBART AVE.
399 ROOSEVELT AVE
5 BASSETT COURT
411 WILSON AVENUE
630 AVE C
94 WASHINGTON STREET
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
260 HIGH STREET
256 VANDERPOOL STREET
217 SOUTH FIRST ST.
WASHINGTON ROAD
255 BLAIR ROAD
EDGEBORO ROAD
CHARLES STREET
NORTH AVENUE
MORRIS AVE. I RT. 22
ERNSTON ROAD
FOOT OF HOOK ROAD
HEUBACH AVE.
414 WILSON AVENUE
LINDEN
NEWARK
BAYONNE
CARTERET
CRANBURY
NEWARK
CARTERET
SOUTH BRUNSWICK
BAYONNE
ELIZABETH
HOBOKEN
LINDEN
NEW BRUNSWICK
ORANGE
PERTH AMBOY
NEWARK
ELIZABETH
SAYREVILLE
WOODBRIDGE TWP.
EAST BRUNSWICK
EDISON
MOUNTAINSIDE
PLAINFIELD
UNION
OLD BRIDGE
BAYONNE
NEWARK
NEWARK
ZIP UTM
CODE NORTHING
07036
07114
07002
07008
08512
07105
07008
07002
07207
07030
07036
08903
07051
08861
07114
07206
08872
07095
08816
08818
07092
07061
07083
08857
07002
07114
07105
4496.0
4485.5
4508.5
4499.7
4465.5
4491.6
4479.3
4480.5
4471 .6
4508.7
4494.0
4469.5
4499.7
4503.1
4511.5
4505.3
4482.9
4510.8
4483.1
4507.3
4299.0
4480.0
4491 .8
4480.0
4482.0
4502.6
4497.0
4479.0
4500.6
4507.2
4507.3
FACILITY
WIDE
UTM EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
465.5
562.5
573.1
574.4
552.5
566.7
563.2
560.0
545.8
572.4
566.5
537.0
574.8
568.3
583.0
563.4
543.8
563.3
561.1
569.3
599.0
557.0
562.7
553.0
554.0
555.2
549.2
561.0
576.2
569.7
572.6
0.20
50.57
0.89
1.34
1.16
0.64
1.02
0.42
0.33
6.15
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY) (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
1.24
0.16
8.36
1.55
0.06
0.13
0.54
0.40
0.40
0.10
0.23
0.10
0.62
0.01
0.04
0.04
0.67
0.30
0.01
0.01
ND1
ND
ND
13.64
0.01
0.23
0.02
0.03
E
E
A
A
E
E P
E
E
A T
A
E
E
P
E P
P
E P
E P
P
E P
A
A
E
A
E
E
A
A
A
E
A
T
A
0.01
0.04
1.24
0.16
0.04
0.20
0.67
0.30
50.57
0.06
0.01
0.01
0.89
1.34
1.16
0.64
1.02
0.42
0.33
0.13
0.54
0.01
0.40
0.23
0.02
0.40
0.10
0.23
0.03
0.10
6.15
0.62
1 "NO" means no data from which air .emissions may be estimated.
* APEDS 12/28/89 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY U1DE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSOEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table 111-5-11: Perchloroethvlene
(continued)
FACILITY NAHE
I.L.R. SLF
JANESBURG SCHOOL FOR BOYS POTU
JOHN B MOORE CORPORATION
JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX-UNION POTU
KIN-BUC INC. *1
KLEINER HETAL SPECIALTIES INC.
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS LANDFILL
LINDEN CITY SLF
LINDEN ROSELLE POTU
LINPRO COMPANY POTU. THE
LOTANO LANDFILL
MAR I SOL INC.
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 1
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 2
MOHAWK LABORATORIES OF NJ
NATIONAL LEAD LANDFILL
NL INDUSTRIES INC. SLF
OLD BRIDGE MUA BROUNTOWN POTU
OLD BRIDGE POTU
PERK CHEMICAL CO.. INC
PLAINSBORO TUP. SLF EXPANSION
P.O. OIL & CHEMICAL STORAGE, INC.
RAHUAY VALLEY SA POTU
ROSS FRANK B CO INC
SAYREVILLE BORO SLF
SOLVENTS RECOVERY SERVICE OF M
SOMERSET -RAR I TAN VALLEY POTU
SOUTH AMBOY CITY LANDFILL
SOUTH AMBOY POTU
SOUTH BRUNSUICK TOWNSHIP
SOUTH BRUNSUICK TUP. SLF
SOUTH PLAINFIELD BORO
(tetrachloroethylene) point source inventory
STREET ADDRESS CITY
ROUTE 9 AT PARKUAY
500 SOUTH FIRST STREET
4315 NEU BRUNSUICK AVE.
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
125 FACTORY LANE
CHEVALIER AVE
STOUTS LANE
OLD UATER WORKS ROAD
FOOT OF EAST 22ND STREET
1050 EAST HAZELWOOD AVE
6-10 ASH STREET
POLHEMUS AVE
RT 522 & DAYTON -JAMESBURG
EDISON
SAYREVILLE
ELIZABETH
EDISON TOWNSHIP
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
MONROE TOWNSHIP
LINDEN
LINDEN
EDISON TOWNSHIP
MIDDLESEX
SAYREVILLE
MONMOUTH JUNCTION
PERTH AMBOY
SAYREVILLE
OLD BRIDGE
ELIZABETH
PLAINSBORO TOWNSHIP
BAYONME
RAHUAY
JERSEY CITY
SAYREVILLE
LINDEN
BRIDGEWATER
SOUTH AMBOY
SOUTH AMBOY
RD DAYTON
SOUTH BRUNSUICK
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
ZIP
CODE
08818
08872
07202
08817
07080
07036
07036
08817
08846
08872
08852
08861
08872
08857
07207
08536
07002
07065
07304
08872
07036
08807
08879
08879
08810
07080
UTM
NORTHING
4482.0
4465.0
4481 .8
4498.4
4482.5
4299.0
4468.0
4494.5
4495.0
4464.0
4494.5
4489.9
4481.0
4483.0
4469.8
4486.0
4483.0
4472.1
4478.6
4499.8
4463.5
4500.9
4492.8
4506.8
4477.0
4496.0
4489.0
4483.0
4481.0
4469.0
4469.0
4490.5
FACILITY^
UIDE
UTH EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
556.5
552.0
559.4
567.9
554.5
599.0
548.0
564.0
567.1
533.2
553.5
540.9
563.3 5.81
550.8 23.11
536.5
562.5
559.0
558.8
564.9 0.24
568.5
535.0
575.9
566.9 8.10
579.3
554.0
563.2
536.6 0.07
559.5
560.0
541.8
538.5
550.5
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
JTPY) (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
0.09
0.39
0.01
198.54
0.04
1.75
0.01
0.02
31.71
1.96
0.01
0.25
244.63
0.18
0.44
0.01
0.01
1.01
2.67
0.03
0.01
3.69
80.56
0.44
0.01
0.19
0.01
2.91
0.11
0.01
0.02
E
E
A
E
E
A
E
E
E
E
E
E
E P
E P
A
E
E
E
E P
E
E
A
E P
A
E
E
T
E
E
A
E
E
0.09
0.39
0.01
198.54
0.04
1.75
0.01
0.02
31.71
1.96
0.01
0.25
5.81
23.11
0.44
0.01
0.01
1.01
0.24
0.03
0.01
3.69
8.10
0.44
0.01
0.19
0.07
0.01
2.91
0.11
0.01
0.02
1 "NO" means no data from which air emissions may be estimated.
A APEDS 12/28/89 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY UIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
8 SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEOS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTU Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
I
Ul
Table 111-5-11: Perch loroethytene
(continued)
FACILITY KANE
TOWN OF KEARNr POTIf
TOWN OF LIVINGSTON POTW
TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY HGHTS UPC POTW
TOWNSHIP OF UOOOBR1DGE POTW 1
TOWNSHIP OF UOODBRIDGE POTU 2
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
LIMITED LABEL CORP.
U.A.S. TERMINALS IMC.
26 TH WARD POTU
ACME STEEL PARTITION CO. INC.
CONEY ISLAND POTU
FRESH KILLS LANDFILL
FRESH KILLS LANDFILL
NEWTOWN CREEK POTU
OAKWOOO BEACH POTW
OULS HEAD POTU
PORT RICHMOND POTU
RED HOOK POTU
(TetracMoroethylene) point
STREET ADDRESS
39 CENTRAL AVE
CLIFF ROAD
1 MAIN STREET
350 ROOSEVELT AVENUE
65 CHAMBERS STREET
126 PASSAIC STREET
HENDRIX SI/JAMAICA BAY
513 PORK* AVENUE
AVE Z/KNAPP ST
METHANE RECOVERY PLANT
329-69 GREEHPOINT AVE
EMMET AVE/NILL ROAD
BAY RIDGE AVE /THE NARROWS
1801 RICHMOND TERRACE
MARSHALL ST/LITTLE ST
source inventory
CITY
KE4RNY
LIVINGSTON
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
SEUAREN
WOODBR1DGE
CARTE RET
NEWARK
NEWARK
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
SUTEN ISLAND
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
BROOKLYN
ZIP UTM
CODE NORTHING
07032
07039
07922
07077
07095
07008
07105
07104
11222
10SK
103H
4507.2
4517.7
4503.4
4489.2
4484.6
4492.0
4508.9
4511.9
4500.1
4500.5
4490.6
4498.0
4498.0
4509.0
4488.7
4498.7
4499.1
4506.4
FACILITY
WIDE
UTM EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
574.9
555.6
546.6
563.5
558.9
566.3
572.2
570.4
595.2
588.3
590.4
570.0
570.0
587.3
574.1
581.6
573.8
586.3
0.35
0.23
0.21
0.08
0.10
1.23
33.95
5.92
0.07
7.70
0.21
0.44
3.29
2.02
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS1 SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY) (TPY) SOURCE (TPY)
T
T
5.31 E
14.53 i P
3.53 E P
0.81 A
T
0.90 A
P
T
P
S
0.31 A
P
P
P
P
P
0.55
0.23
5.31
0.21
0.08
0.81
0.10
0.90
1.23
33.95
5.92
0.07
0.312
7.70
0.21
0.44
3.29
2.02
411.80
1 "NO" means no data from which air emissions may be estimated.
* APEDS 12/28/89 • permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
8 Estimated Missions for portion of landfill not served by methane-recovery plant; estimate based on volume and area information fro« Gleason (1992) end the ASES
emission factor.
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TR1 (SARA 313). the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A » APEDS; E * Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
£
Table 1H-5-12: ToVuene uoint sourc
FACILITY MAKE
ABLON FINISHES INC.
ADCO CHEMICAL CO.
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC.
AIR-0-PLASTIK CORP.
AKZO CHEMICALS INC.
ALCAN ALUMINUM CORP.
ALCAN BUILDING PRODUCTS
ALLIED PROCESSING CORPORATION
ALPHA ASSOCIATES INC.
ALPHA METALS INC.
AMERADA HESS CORP.
AMERCHOL CORP.
AMERICAN BUS REBUILDERS INC.
AMERICAN CYANAMIO CO. WARNERS PLT
AMERICAN FINISHING I SPRAY CO.. INC.
AMERICAN LEATHER MFG. CO.
AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN CO.
ARDMORE CHEMICAL COMPANY
ARISTOH INC.
ASARCO INC. SLF
ASHLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY
ATLANTIC METAL PRODUCTS, INC.
AURACHEM CORP.
A.J. JERSEY INC.
B & B CUSTOM CABINETS
BEECHAH LABORATORIES
BENJAMIN MOORE & CO., INC.
BET HAM CORP.. THE
BFI OF SOUTH JERSEY SLF
BON-ART INTERNATIONAL
e inventory
STREET ADDRESS
84 WAYDELL ST
49 RUTHERFORD ST
172 BAEKELAND AVE
150 FIELDCREST AVE
500 JERSEY AVENUE
901 LEHIGH AVE
11 CRAGUOOD RD
1050 COMMERCE AVE
2 AMBOV AVE
600 ROUTE 440
750 CLIFF RD
136 TALMADGE RD
330 CENTRAL AVENUE
4900 TREMLEY POINT
135 NJ RAILROAD AVENUE
2195 ELIZABETH AVE
135 NATIONAL RD
29 RIVERSIDE AVENUE
485 BLOY ST
221 FOUNDRY STREET
600 NORTH UNION AVE
SOUTH 3RD & SOMERSET STS
1515 E. LINDEN AVE
720 LINCOLN BLVD.
101 POSSUMTOUN RD
134 LISTER AVENUE
LINCOLN BLVD & RIVER RD
325 PINE STREET
CITY
NEWARK
NEWARK
MIDDLESEX
EDISON
NEW BRUNSWICK
UNION
UOOOBRIDGE
UNION
WOODBRIDGE
JERSEY CITY
PORT READING
EDISON
NEWARK
LINDEN
NEWARK
RAHUAY
EDISON
NEWARK
HILLSIDE
NEWARK
HILLSIDE
HARRISON
LINDEN
MIDDLESEX
PISCATAWAY
NEWARK
MIDDLESEX
ELIZABETH
ZIP
CODE
07105
07105
08846
08837
08903
07083
07095
07083
07095
07304
07064
08818
07107
07036
07105
07065
08817
07104
07205
07114
07205
07029
07036
07023
08854
07105
08846
07206
UTH
NORTHING
4509.7
4506.7
4490.2
4485.6
4480.9
4503.1
4489.9
4505.8
4487.7
4506.9
4490.0
4486.7
4494.2
4506.5
4495.8
4486.0
4512.8
4505.3
4485.5
4508.5
4505.4
4510.0
4499.5
4489.4
4509.8
4486.4
4465.5
4500.6
FAC1LITYF
WIDE
UTH EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
570.5
572.7
542.0
556.2
545.1
563.6
560.7
560.6
561.4
578.8
564.0
551.1
567.3
569.9
561.9
552.5
571.0
566.0
562.5
573.1
564.0
574.6
564.8
543.6
573.2
540.4
552.5
568.8
0.13
0.50
23.00
4.55
4.80
10.90
66.94
2.23
41.48
4.36
10.03
0.25
1.96
24.52
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY) (TPY) SOURCE3 (TPY)
9.00
0.01
26.99
3.11
1.04
0.54
0.40
24.53
23.12
1.28
33.11
3.28
0.38
0.11
61.89
3.46
0.02
0.17
8.15
0.44
5.14
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
0.01 E
A
A
A
A
A
A
0.01 E
A
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
0.13
0.50
0.01
23.00
26.99
3.11
4.55
0.54
4.80
0.40
10.90
66.94
1.28
2.23
3.28
41.48
4.36
0.11
10.03
0.01
61.89
3.46
0.25
0.02
0.17
1.96
0.44
24.52
0.01
5.14
* APEDS 01/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SHS), or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
i
Table 111-5-12: Toluene ooint soui
FACILITY NAME
BORDON INC. - CHEMICAL
BOROUGH OF CARTERET POTU
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 1
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 2
BOXAL INC.
BPt INDUSTRIES
BROTHER IN LAW ART CORP.
BIS PACKAGING t STORAGE CO. INC.
CARDOLITE CORP.
CASCHEM INC.
CELLOMER DIV.
CHASE CHEMICAL CORP. L. P.
CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT OF NJ
CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY
CHICK'S AUTO BODY INC.
CHICOPEE
CIBA-GEIGY CORP
CITY OF BAYONNE POTU
CITY OF ELIZABETH POTU
CITY OF HOBOKEN POTU
CITY OF LINDEN POTU
CITY OF NEU BRUNSWICK POTU
CITY OF ORANGE DPU POTU
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POTU
CLASSIC COACH REPAIR INC
CLASSIC LAMINATING CORP.
CLEM'S ORNAMENTAL IRON WORKS INC.
COLORAMA AUTO BODY CENTER
COLUMBIA LEATHER & COATING CO IMC
COLUMBIA TERMINALS INC.
CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES INC.
-ce inventory (continued)
STREET ADDRESS
930 LINCOLN BLVD
399 ROOSEVELT AVE
5 BASSETT COURT
125 MONITOR STREET
159 TICHEMOR STREET
411 WILSON AVENUE
500 DOREMUS AVENUE
40 AVENUE A
46 ALBERT AVE
280 CHESTNUT ST
100 LISTER AVENUE
SUMMIT AVENUE
66-68 COLUMBIA AVENUE
2351 US ROUTE 130
556 MORRIS AVE
630 AVE C
94 WASHINGTON STREET
5005 SOUTH UOOD AVE
260 HIGH STREET
1007 SOUTH ELMORA AVE
100 TIFfANY BLVD.
110 11TH STREET
150 SOUTH AVE
10 MARKET STREET
49 CENTRAL AVENUE
55 VI NANS AVE.
CITY
MIDDLESEX
CARTERET
CR ANBURY
JERSEY CITY
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
BAYONNE
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
KEARNY
SOUTH BRUNSUICK
SUMMIT
BAYONNE
ELIZABETH
HOBOKEN
LINDEN
NEU BRUNSUICK
ORANGE
PERTH AMBOY
ELIZABETH
NEWARK CITY
PI SCAT AWAY
GARWOOD
KENILWORTH
KEARNY
CRANFORO
ZIP UTH
CODE NORTHING
08846
07008
08512
07105
07105
07105
07002
07105
07105
07105
07922
07032
07901
07002
07207
07030
07036
08903
07051
08861
07207
07104
08854
07027
07033
07032
07016
4491.2
4491.6
4479.3
4480.5
4471.6
450B.2
4508.7
4507.6
4499.8
4509.5
4501.6
4510.0
4504.0
FACILITY*
WIDE
UTM EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
542.3
566.7
563.2
560.0
545.0
569.9
572.4
573.7
572.6
572.8
570.4
573.0
547.0
2.
0.
0.
1.
3.
13.
15
36
50
53
72
92
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY) (TPY) SOURCE3 (TPY)
6.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
13.
0.
1.
1.
30
58
01
19
03
58
49
08
89
96
0.09
4468.7
4507.9
4499.7
4503.1
4511.5
4505.3
4482.9
4510. B
4483.1
45U.5
4500.0
4502.9
4507.0
4500.6
542.1
553.3
574.8
568.3
583.0
563.4
543.8
563.3
561.1
570.0
556.5
560. B
575.0
559.0
0.01
2.
1.
2.
54
59
40
16.82
A T
16.66 E P
1.34 E
0.60 E
A
A
A
A
A T
A T
A T
T
A
A
A
A
A T
2.08
1.15
1.82
0.76
0.60
0
4
0
0
1
0
28
91
44
78
.00
.09
8.40
27.17 E
A
A
A
A
A
A
T
2.15
0.36
1.34
0.60
0.58
0.01
0.19
0.03
0.50
1.53
3.72
13.92
1.89
1.96
0.09
0.01
2.54
1.59
2.40
2.08
1.15
1.82
0.76
0.60
0.28
4.91
0.44
0.78
1.00
0.09
B.40
APEDS 01/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TR1 (SARA 313). the NYSOEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table Ul-5-te: toluene point source inventory (continued)
t
00
FACILITY UAHE
STREET ADDRESS
CITY
CONVERTERS INK CO.
CON-LUX COATINGS INC.
COSMAIR INC.
CPS CHEMICAL CORP
CRINCOLI WOODWORK CO, IMC
CROHPTON & KNOULES CORP.
CROW METAL FINISHING CO. INC.
C.U.C. INDUSTRIES INC.
DE DIETRICH USA INC
OELEET MERCHANDISING CORP.
DOCK RESItfS CORP.
DREHER LEATHER MFG. CORP.
DRI PRINT FOILS INC.
DROBACH PETER A. CO, INC.
DRUM SERVICE OF NEWARK INC.
DURALAC INC.
E I OUPONT DE NEMOURS * CO
EAGLE PLYWOOD t DOOR MFG. CO.
EASTERN STEEL BARREL CORP
EDGEBORO DISPOSAL SLF
EDISON TOWNSHIP SLF
ELAN CHEMICAL CO.
EM INDUSTRIES, INC.
ESSEX SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC.
ETHYL CORP.
EXHIBIT TECHNOLOGY FOR INDUSTRY
EXXON BAYWAY REFINERY
EXXON CHEMICAL AMERICAS
EXXON COMPANY USA
E.R. SQUIBB t SOMS
FAIRHOUNT CHEMICAL CO. INC.
1301 S. PARK AVE
226 TALHADGE RD
121 NEW ENGLAND
OLD WATERWORKS RD
160 SPRING STREET
52 AMSTERDAM ST
40 BORIGHT AVE
185 FOUNDRY STREET
US ROUTE 22 WB I Rft CROSS
26 BLANCHAflO ST
1512 UEST ELIZABETH AVE
42 GARDEN STREET
329 NEW BRUNSWICK AVE
US HIGHWAY 22 I BALL AVE
51 STANTON STREET
84 LISTER AVE
CHEESEQUAKE ROAD
450 OAK TREE AVENUE
4100 NEW BRUNSWICK AVE
EDGEBORO ROAD
268 DOREHUS AVE
FOOT OF EAST 21ST STREET
1 CROSSMAN RD SOUTH
880 HAIN ST
10 JOYCE STREET
1400 PARK AVE
WEST 22ND STREET
250 EAST 22UD STREET
1 SOUIBB DRIVE
117 BLANCHARD ST
LINDEN
EDISON
PI SCAT AIM Y
OLD BRIDGE
ELIZABETH
NEWARK
KENILWORTH
NEWARK
UNION
NEWARK
LINDEN
NEWARK
RAHWAY
UNION
NEWARK
NEWARK
SAYREVILLE
SOUTH PLAINFIELO
PISCATAWAY
EAST BRUNSWICK
EDISON
NEWARK
BAYONNE
SAYREVILLE
SAYREVILLE
WEST ORANGE
LINDEN
BAYONNE
BAYONNE
NORTH BRUNSWICK
NEWARK
07036
08818
08854
08857
07201
07105
07033
07105
07083
07105
07036
07105
07065
07083
07114
07105
08872
07080
06854
08816
08818
07105
07002
08872
08872
07052
07036
07002
07002
08902
07105
4497.9
4487.6
4488.5
4475.7
4501.5
4507.8
4503.1
4508.5
4S04.7
4508.9
4496.4
4508.6
4494.5
4504.4
4508.1
4509.7
4478.8
4491.6
4487.6
4480.0
4462.0
4508.2
4501.3
4480.5
4480.2
4497.9
4500.2
4516.6
4480.1
4507.7
FACUmF
WIDE
ZIP UTH UTH EMISSIONS
COPE NORTHING EASTING (TPY)
566.2
552.9
544.9
557.2
567.0
572.2
558.9
573.5
559.8
572.2
561.?
570.1
561.3
560.0
568.9
573.1
556.7
550.5
547.3
553.0
554.0
573.9
574.9
557.J
557.6
567.4
576.7
583.8
547.0
573.6
0.25
5.88
0.15
0.73
0.02
0.02
0.26
57.37
0.38
9.61
0.50
0.25
1.98
78.50
50.00
0.68
0.50
ENGINEERING
APEDS* SCIENCE
(TPY) (TPY) SOURCE5
3.70
0.16
2.30
0.26
2.51
47.10
0.22
26.98
7.00
6.50
155.51
0.01
0.65
86.01
1.80
9.21
2.05
0.01
7.32
0.11
0.06
0.04
0.28
2.24
UATAP
EMISSIONS
INVENTORY
(TPY)
0.08
0.01
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
0.25
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
5.88
0.15
0.73
0.26
0.02
2.51
47.10
0.22
0.02
0.28
6.50
57.37
0.01
0.65
0.38
9.61
1.80
0.50
0.08
0.01
0.25
0.01
1.98
78.50
0.11
50.00
0.06
0.04
0.68
0.50
APEDS Dt/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data front TRI (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table HI-5-12; Toluene point source inventory (continued)
00
vfi
FACILITY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
CITY
FACILITY1"
WIDE
ZIP UTK UTH EMISSIONS
COPE NORTHING EASTING tTPY)
ENGINEERING
APEDSA SCIENCE
FERRO INDUSTRIES INC.
FIRMEM1CH INC.
FHC CORPORATION
FORO MOTOR CO EPI SON ASSEMBLY PLT
FRAGRANCE RESOURCES INC
FRANCIS CHEVROLET INC.
FRANKLIN AUTO BODY
GAP CHEMICALS CORP. LINDEN PLT.
GATK TERMINALS CORP.
GENERAL MOTORS CORP. CPC GROUP
GETTY PETROLEUM CORP.
GLOBAL CORP. SLF
GOHAR MANUFACTURING CO. INC.
GOODY PRODUCTS INC.
GRANT. WILLIAM I SONS. INC.
GREEM BROOK CABINET SHOP
HANSOME ENERGY SYSTEMS INC
HENKEL CORPORATION
HERCULES INCORPORATED
HERMAN MILLER, INC.
HEUBACH INC.
HOFFMAN LAROCHE INC.
HONIG CHEMICAL & PROCESSING CORP.
HOWARD MARLBORO GROUP
HUDSON CO. AREA VOC-TECH SCHOOLS
HULS AMERICA, INC.
HULS AMERICA INC.
INDUSTRIAL PETROCHEMICALS CO, INC.
INTERNAT FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES (R£D)
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES
INTREX CORPORATION
99 JERSEY AVE
928-964 DOREMUS AVENUE
PLAINSBORO ROAD
939 US ROUTE 1
275 CLARK ST
777 LYONS AVEHUE
994 STUYVESANT AVENUE
FOOT OF SOUTH WOOD AVE
78 LAFAYETTE STREET
1016 WEST EDGAR 80
ROUTE 36 t AVENUE 0
ERNSTON ROAO
1501 WEST BLANCKE ST
969 NEUARK TURNPIKE
130 F1ELOCREST AVENUE
260 WAGNER STREET
358 OALZIEL ROAD
FIRST £ ESSEX STREETS
MINI SINK t, CHEESEOUAKE RD
180 HERROD BLVD.
HEUBACH AVENUE
HEUBACH AVENUE
414 WILSON AVENUE
100 CENTRAL AVEHUE
525 MONTGOMERY STREET
830 MAGNOLJA AVENUE
TURNER PLACE
128 DOREHUS AVENUE
1515 HIGHWAY 36
800 ROSE LANE
1000 FIRST STREET
NEW BRUNSWICK
NEWARK
PLAtNSBORO TUP.
EDI SOU
KEYPORT
IRVIHGTOH
IRVINGTON
LINDEN
CARTERET
LtHOEN
ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS
OLD BRIDGE
LINDEN
KEARNY
EOISOM TWP
MIDDLESEX
LIMDEH
HARRISON
SAYREVJLLE
DAYTON
NEUARK
NEWARK
NEUARK
SOUTH KEARNY
JERSEY CITY
ELIZABETH
P1SCATAUAY
NEUARK
UNION BEACH
UNION BEACH
HARRISON
08901
07105
08556
08318
07735
07111
07111
07036
07008
07036
07716
08857
07036
07032
caai7
08846
07036
07029
08872
08810
071 H
071 H
07105
07032
07030
07201
08854
07105
07735
07735
07029
4481.7
4505.6
4465.1
4485.2
4474.6
4507.9
4507. \
4495.2
4492.7
4496.2
4479.0
4496.6
4514.2
4485.6
4497.0
4510.6
4477.5
4468.0
4507.2
4507.3
4507.8
4501 .8
4482.7
4508.8
4476.5
4477.1
4509.7
545.9
573.6
531.9
551.2
567.2
565.5
562.9
567.3
566.7
562.8
561.0
562.1
572.4
556,0
562.0
570.5
555.6
544.5
569.7
572.6
578.8
567.3
554.0
573.1
571.5
571.8
570.6
0.38
as.38
0.86
0.53
107.10
1.98
9.55
0.25
0.68
0.16
0.12
0.79
3.54
0.80
0.60
2.19
0.26
0,22
0.02
0.11
12.32
24.70
1.74
0.18
46.85
0.62
8.79
0.03
0.16
11.76
0.04
60.66
16.58
(TPY> SOURCE"
UATAP
EMISSIONS
INVENTORY
(TPY)
0.01
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
I
1
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
0.38
0.16
0.12
28.38
0.66
0.60
0.80
0.53
2.19
107.10
0.26
0.01
1.98
9.55
0.22
0.02
0.11
12.32
24.70
1.74
0.18
46.85
0.62
8.79
0.03
0.16
11.76
0.04
0.25
0.68
16.58
APEDS 01/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
f FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSOEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
3 SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventor/; P = EPA Region II POTU Inventory; S = SMS; T * TRI.
-------
Table Ul-5-12: Toluene point sourc
FACILITY NAME
I.L.R. SLF
JAMESBURG SCHOOL FOR BOYS POTU
JOANNES-CHESTERCRAFT INC
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO INC
JOHNSON £ JOHNSON CO., INC.
JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX-UNION POTU
KINGSLAND DRUM I BARREL CO., INC.
KIN-BUC INC. #1
(COP-COAT INC.
LINDEN CITY SLF
LINDEN ROSELLE POTU
LINPRO COMPANY POTU, THE
'L.M.T. STEEL PRODUCTS, INC.
MAAS I UALDSTEIN CO.
MACY/BAMBERGER'S FURNITURE DIST.
MAR 1 SOL INC.
MARTIN TROOSKIN T/A ECONOMY SUPPLY
MERCK I CO
MID ATLANTIC CONTAINER CORP.
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 1
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 2
HIELACH MILLUORK COMP
MOBIL CHEM CORP CHEN PRODUCTS 01 V
MONHOUTN COUNTY BD. OF ED.
MOM- ECO INDUSTRIES INC
MULBERRY METAL PRODUCTS INC.
NAMES FINISHING ASSEMBLY CORP.
NATIONAL BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC
NATIONAL CAN CORP.
NATIONAL DISTILLERS & CHEMICAL CORP
NATIONAL EQUIPMENT & DESIGN CO
NATIONAL METALLIZING
« inventory (continued)
STREET ADDRESS
2208 B. HAMILTON BLVD
US ROUTE 1 I AARON ROAD
US ROUTE 1
500 SOUTH FIRST STREET
308 MILLER STREET
480 FRELINGHUYSEH AVE
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
550 9TH STREET
2121 MC CARTER HUY
401 CLEARVIEU ROAD
125 FACTORY LANE
1726 E. ELIZABETH AVENUE
126 EAST LINCOLN AVE
1200 U. BLANCKE ST
CHEVALIER AVE
9 KILMER COURT
ROUTE 27 * VINEYARD RO
ATLANTIC AVENUE
5 JOANNA CT.
2199 STANLEY TERRACE
305 THIRD AVENUE WEST
BOO HONTROSE AVE
287 SOUTH RANDOLPH ROAD
300 DOREMUS AVENUE
967 LEHIGH AVENUE
ABEEL ROAD
CITY
EDISON
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
NORTH BRUNSWICK
NORTH BRUNSWICK
ELIZABETH
NEUARK
EDISON TOWNSHIP
NEUARK
LINDEN
LINDEN
HOBOKEN
NEUARK
EDISON
MIDDLESEX
LINDEN
RAHUAY
LINDEN
SAYREVILLE
EDISON
EDISON
MATAUAN
EAST BRUNSWICK
UNION
NEUARK
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
PISCATAUAY
NEUARK
UNION
CRANBURY
ZIP
CODE
08818
07080
08902
08902
07202
07014
08817
07114
07036
07036
07030
07104
08837
08846
07036
07065
07036
08872
08818
08818
07747
08816
07083
07107
07080
08854
07105
07083
08515
UTH
NORTHING
4482.0
4465.0
4489.9
4477.5
4479.6
4498.4
4507.3
4482.5
4505.8
4494.5
4495.0
4464.0
4511.0
4514.0
4486.1
4489.9
4499.6
4495.7
4496.9
4481.0
4483.0
4486.7
4486.7
4474.0
4477.0
4505.1
4512.5
4489.6
4507.5
4502.7
4465.5
FACILITY11
WIDE
UTH EMISSIONS
EASTING I TPY)
556.5
552.0
549.3
542.5
547.0
567.9
569.8
554.5
568.1
564.0
567.1
533.2
581.6
571.6
557.1
540.9
564.9
562.4
564.4
563.3
550.8
549.1
552.3
566.1
550.4
561.3
568.9
545.4
573.5
563.0
544.2
15.77
1.07
5.37
12.63
46.50
5.79
10.41
46.02
0.75
0.25
33.62
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY) (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
0.76
0.27
1.24
12.10
0.88
2.26
1.80
0.11
2.82
101.81
18.31
3.12
124.73
0.09
5.50
0.26
0.57
7.25
0.13
0.52
30.32
0.03 E
0.77 E
A
A
A
395.42 E P
A
0.01 E
A T
0.01 E
63.15 E P
3.90 E
A
A T
A
0.74 E
A
A T
A T
487.21 E P
0.36 E P
A
A T
A
T
A T
A
A
A
A
A
A
0.03
0.77
0.76
0.27
1.24
15.77
12.10
0.01
1.07
0.01
5.37
3.90
2.26
12.63
0.11
0.74
2.82
46.50
5.79
10.41
46.02
3.12
0.75
0.09
0.25
33.62
0.26
0.57
7.25
0.13
0.52
30.32
APEDS 01/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TR1 (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P * EPA Region II POTU Inventory; S = SHS; T = TRI.
-------
Table III-5-12: Toluene point source inventory (continued)
FACILITY NAME
NATIONAL PATENT DEVELOPMENT CORP.
NEW BRUNSWICK SCIENTIFIC CO. INC.
NEW YORK BRONZE POWDER CO. INC.
HEUARK INDUSTRIAL SPRAVINC INC.
NEWPORT CUT DEVELOPMENT CO.
HOVICK CHEMICALS
NYREX II INC.
CFF THE ROAD TIRE CORP.
OKONITE CO PLANT *31600
OLD BRIDGE MUA BROWN TOWN POTW
OLD BRIDGE POTW
ORBIS PRODUCTS CORPORATION
P HORACE ft G BIER - RICHARDS KFG
PARAMOUNT METAL FINISHING CO INC
PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION
PAUL C. STECK INC.
PENICK CORPORATION
PEN ICC CORP.
PERK CHEMICAL CO., INC.
PERHACEL
PMC, INC. (SPECIALTIES GROUP)
POLAROME MFG. CO. INC.
PRO AUTO COLLISION INC.
PROSPECT INDUSTRIAL CORP
RAOEL LEATHER CO.
RAHUAY VALLEY SA POTU
RBH DISPERSIONS INC.
REICNHOLD CHEMICALS INC.
REVLOH INC.
REVLON INC.
STREET ADDRESS
783 JERSEY AVENUE
44 TALMADCE ROAD
515-519 DOM) AVENUE
12 AMSTERDAM STREET
145 12TH STREET
181-183 ENMETT STREET
390 NYE AVENUE
462 FOREST AVENUE
US ROUTE 1
OLD WATER WORKS ROAD
55 VIRGINIA STREET
517 LYONS AVENUE
1515 UEST ELIZABETH AVE
601 NASSAU STREET
12-20 AMSTERDAM STREET
2151 NILLBURN AVENUE
158 HT. OLIVET AVENUE
US ROUTE 1
INDUSTRIAL AVENUE
363 SOUTH STREET
37 PARK STREET
1202 AIRPORT ROAD
849 BROADWAY
1050 EAST HAZELWOCO AVE
L-5 FACTORY LANE
726 ROCKEFELLER STREET
60 S HILTS ROAD
55 TALMADGE ROAD
CITY
NEW BRUNSWICK
EDISON
ELIZABETH
NEWARK
JERSEY CITY
NEWARK
IRVINGTON
KEARNY
NORTH BRUNSWICK
OLD BRIDGE
NEWARK
IRVINGTON
LINDEN
NORTH BRUNSWICK
NEWARK
HAPLEWOOO
NEWARK
ELIZABETH
NORTH BRUNSWICK
FORDS
NEWARK
ORANGE
NORTH BRUNSWICK
NEWARK
RAHWAY
MIDDLESEX
ELIZABETH
DAYTON
EDISON
ZIP UTN
CODE NORTHING
08901
08818
07201
07105
07372
07114
07111
07032
08902
08857
07114
07111
07036
08902
07105
07040
07114
07207
08902
08863
07105
07050
08902
07104
07065
08846
07202
08810
08818
4478.3
4486.7
4502.3
4501.6
4508.9
4507.6
4513.3
4477.8
4472.1
4478.6
4504.2
4507.9
4496.4
4479.2
4507.9
4504.4
4499.8
4479.6
4484.5
4507.4
4479.5
4513.5
4492.8
4488.6
4497.9
4485.6
UTM
EASTING
541.7
551.5
569.3
570.4
581.3
569.9
572.7
552.4
558.8
564.9
567.2
564.8
562.2
544.4
572.1
567.3
568.5
546.7
557.2
573.6
543.8
571.0
566.9
542.2
567.7
552.4
FACILITYF
WIDE
EMISSIONS
(TPY)
2.50
1.29
0.25
2.97
7.58
0.44
2.60
15.14
1143.86
1.00
519.25
13.66
8.88
0.34
1.06
ENGINEERING
APEDSA SCIENCE
(TPY) UPY) SOURCE5
0.18
0.01
0.04
0.05
0.74
7.04
1.80
2.47
0.66
1.57
4.06
1964.84
0.58
1.99
0.50
78.64
9.32
8.80
0.24
2.29
A
A
A
A
A
2.01 E
5.32 E P
A
A
A
A
A
A
0.08 E
A
A
A
A
A
160.43 E P
A
A
A
A
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
UATAP
EMISSIONS
INVENTORY
CTPY)
2.50
1.29
0.25
2.97
0.01
0.04
0.05
0.74
7.58
2.01
0.44
7.04
2.60
1.80
2.47
0.66
1.57
15.14
0.08
1,143.86
0.58
1.00
0.50
78.64
519.25
13.66
6.88
0.34
0.24
1.06
APEDS 01/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TR1 (SARA 313). the NtSDEC Source Management System (SMS>, or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region I! POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table UI-5-A2: Toluene point source inventory (continued)
FACILITY NAME
RHONE -POULENC INC.
ROLOC FILM PROCESSING INC.
ROYAL WIRE GOODS NFG CORP.
RUSSEL STANLEY EAST INC.
SAFETY-KLEEN CORP
SCHERING CORP
SCHER1NG CORP
SERVILLO ASSOCIATES INC.
SERVILLO ASSOCIATES INC.
SETON CO. RADEL TANNING DIV.
SHELL OIL COMPANY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
SOLVENTS RECOVERY SERVICE
SOMERSET-RARITAN VALLEY POTW
> SOUTH ANBOY POTW
VO SOUTH PLAINFIELD BORO POTW
N» SPENCER KELLOGG PRODUCTS
STACOR CORP.
STEEL CRAFT FLUORESCENT COMPANY
SYNRAY CORPORATION
TACHONICS CORPORATION
TECHNICAL COATING CO.. INC.
TENAX FINISHING PRODUCTS CO.
TEVCO INC.
TINGLEY RUBBER CORP.
TITAN ADHESIVES COMPANY. INC.
TOWN OF KEARNY POTW
TOWN OF LIVINGSTON POTW
TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY HGHTS WPC POTW
STREET ADDRESS
297 JERSEY AVENUE
29 RIVERSIDE AVENUE
319 ST. PAUL'S AVENUE
CONVERT BLVD
1200 SYLVAN STREET
2000 GALLOPING HILL RD
1011 MORRIS AVENUE
34 EXCHANGE PLACE
210 PASSAIC STREET
849 BROADWAY
1300 ROUTE 27
111 STATE STREET
POLHEMUS AVENUE
400 DOREMUS AVENUE
285 EMMET STREET
191 MURRAY STREET
209 N. MICHIGAN AVENUE
107 MORGAN LANE
500 CHANCELLOR AVENUE
390 ADAMS STREET
690 HONTROSE AVENUE
200 SOUTH AVENUE
590 BELLEVILLE TURNPIKE
39 CENTRAL AVENUE
CITY
NEW BRUNSWICK
NEWARK
JERSEY CITY
WOOOBRIDGE
LINDEN
KENILWORTH
UNION
JERSEY CITY
NEWARK
NEWARK
NORTH BRUNSWICK
SEWAREN
LINDEN
BRIDGEWATER
SOUTH AMBOY
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
KENILWORTH
PLAINSBORO
IRVINGTON
NEWARK
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
KEARNY
KEARNY
LIVINGSTON
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
ZIP
CODE
08903
07104
07306
07095
07036
07033
07083
07303
07104
07104
08902
07077
07036
08807
08879
07080
07105
07114
07114
07033
08536
07111
07114
07080
07080
07032
07032
07039
07922
UTM
NORTHING
4481.8
4513.2
4510.2
4486.7
4495.9
4503.0
4505.1
4507.5
4513.5
4480.7
4487.8
4496.0
4469.0
4481.0
4490.5
4507.5
4507.7
4508.3
4503.3
4464.4
4507.3
4490.4
4488.8
4513.3
4507.2
4517.7
4503.4
FACILITY^
WIDE
UTM EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
545.9
571.0
578.8
546.9
563.3
560.3
561.3
581.7
571.0
543.8
562.8
563.2
536.6
560.0
550.5
573.9
569.6
570.2
560.2
534.3
570.6
548.7
549.9
573.7
574.9
555.6
546.6
56.50
35.04
1.22
111.88
0.37
0.25
10.35
2.88
0.50
1.17
0.63
0.41
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDSA SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPT) (TPY) SOURCE5 (TPY)
1 .89 A T
7.66 A
1.26 A
35.00 A T
65.91
0.15
8.17 T
0.25
1.76
2.24 T
0.22
3.61 A
0.56 E
P
5.79 E
0.01 E
3.70 A T
T
0.03
0.53 T
3.82
14.11
1.75 T
T
0.06 A
0.75 A
P
P
10.57 E
56.50
7.66
1.26
35.04
65.91
0.15
1.22
0.25
1.76
111.88
0.22
3.61
0.56
0.37
5.79
0.01
0.25
10.35
0.03
2.88
3.82
14.11
0.50
1.17
0.06
0.75
0.63
0.41
10.57
* APEOS 01/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313). the NYSOEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
8 SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEOS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
U*
Table III-5-12: Toluene point source inventory (continued)
FACILITY NAME
TOWNSHIP OF UOODBRIDGE POTU
TOWNSHIP OF UOODBRIDGE POTU
TRAHSCO PRODUCTS CORP.
TRANSFER PRINT FOILS INC.
TREHLEY POINT INDUSTRIES
TRIPLE K METAL PRODUCTS CO, INC.
TROY CHEMICAL CORP.
UOO FINISHING CO.
UNION CARBIDE CORP BOUND BROOK PLT
UNION CARBIDE INDUSTRIAL GASES INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
UAL-JER INC
WARNER MFC CORP.
UE8CRAFT CHEMICALS, CRAIG ADHESIVE
WEBCRAFT TECHNOLOGIES
WHITTAKER CORP NO. BRUNSWICK D1V
UILSOK IMPERIAL CO.
WOOD TEXTURES INC.
ZAGATA FABRICATORS, INC.
AM8ERG & H1NZMANN WOODWORK GRP INC
ARGUS DIV.
COKEY ISLAND POTU
DELTA METAL PRODUCTS CO.
FYN PAINT & LACQUER CO. INC.
GLOSS FLO CORP.
HARCO CHEMICAL COATINGS INC.
INDUSTRIAL FINISHING PRODUCTS INC.
INDUSTRIAL FINISHING PRODUCTS INC.
INDUSTRIAL FINISHING PRODUCTS INC.
JEFSTEEL BUSINESS EQUIP. CORP.
STREET ADDRESS
1 CLIFF ROAD
21 MAIN STREET
609 U. ELIZABETH AVENUE
9 COTTERS LANE
4700 TREHLEY POINT ROAD
209 WOOD AVENUE
ONE AVENUE L
49 V£SEY STREET
1 RIVER ROAD
INDUSTRIAL AVENUE
350 ROOSEVELT AVENUE
1052 VALLEY STREET
100 3RD AVENUE
80 WHEELER POINT ROAD
US ROUTE 1 t ADAMS STATION
1430-1470 JERSEY AVE
115 CHESTNUT STREET
300 HCGAW DRIVE
2001 JERNEE HI LI ROAD
165 SIXTH STREET
633 COURT STREET
AVE Z/KNAPP STREET
476 FLUSHING AVENUE
229 KENT AVENUE
135 JACKSON STREET
208 OUPONT STREET
465 LOGAN STREET
214 40TH STREET
820-840 REHSEN AVENUE
1345 HAL SET STREET
CITY
SEUAREH
UOODBRIDGE
LINDEN
EAST BRUNSUICK
LINDEN
MIDDLESEX
NEWARK
NEWARK
PISCATAWAY
KEASBEY
CARTERET
UNION TUP
KEARNY
NEWARK
NORTH BRUNSWICK
NORTH BRUNSWICK
NEWARK
EDISON
SAYREVILLE
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
ZIP UTM
CODE NORTHING
07077
07095
07036
08816
07036
08846
07105
07105
08854
08832
07008
07083
07032
07105
08902
08902
07105
08837
08872
11215
11231
11205
11211
11211
11222
11203
11232
11236
11237
4489.2
4484.6
4497.0
4477.2
4494.9
4490.2
4507.3
4508.1
4488.7
4485.2
4492.0
4507.4
4512.2
4508.9
4476.7
4480.2
4508.1
4485.6
4476.8
4502.2
4502.7
4490.6
4505.4
4507.5
4507.4
4509.6
4512.9
4512.9
4512.9
4506.0
FACILITYF
UEDE
UTM EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
563.5
558.9
563.4
549.3
566.7
542.1
570.2
571.9
540.7
558.2
566.3
559.7
572.4
572.2
542.9
543.9
570.0
556.4
554.8
585.7
584.4
590.4
588.1
587.4
589.4
588.5
587.2
587.2
587.2
592.4
0.37
0.15
5.22
75.33
0.50
5.59
31.27
17.90
12.41
0.93
1.63
6.84
0.38
0.24
5.75
0.75
8.75
10.00
0.30
0.50
0.36
4.23
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY) (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
28.94 E P
7.03 E P
T
0.13 A T
0.02
0.01
0.04
45.73
0.25
0.80
0.76
0.20
1.43
0.01
1.32
1.38
5.86
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
P
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
0.37
0.15
5.22
75.33
0.02
0.01
0.50
5.59
31.27
0.25
0.80
0.76
0.20
17.90
12.41
0.93
1.63
1.38
5.86
6.84
0.38
0.24
5.75
0.75
8.75
10.00
0.30
0.50
0.36
4.23
APEDS 01/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY UIOE EMISSIONS weans data from TR1 (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table Ht-5-12: Toluene point source inventory (continued)
FACILITY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
CITY
NATIONAL ORUH fc BARREL CORP.
NEWTOUN CREEK POTU
N.Y. MARDBDARO I PLYWOOD CORP.
N.Y. HARDBOARD & PLYUOOD CORP.
OAKWOOD BEACH POTU
OWLS HEAD POTU
R I A SPECIALTY CHEMICAL CO.
RED HOOK POTU
TECH PRODUCTS, INC.
ULANO CORP.
ULANO CORP.
VAN GUARD CORP.
U.E.U. CONTAINER B INLAND PAPER CO
35 SEADEL STREET
329-369 GREENPOINT AVENUE
129 30TH STREET
230-234 25TH STREET
EMMET AVE/MILL ROAD
BAY RIDGE AVE/THE NARROWS
812 EAST 43RD STREET
MARSHALL ST/LITTLE ST
105 UILLOU AVENUE
601 BERGEN ST
280 BERGEN ST
10 JAVA ST
200 BRADFORD ST
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
ZIP
CODE
11222
11232
11215
11210
10305
11217
11217
FACILITY1"
UIDE
UTM UTM EMISSIONS
NORTHING EASTING (TPY)
APEDS*
11207
4508.5
4509.0
4500.4
4502.2
4488.7
4498.7
4497.5
4506.4
4501.8
4503.8
4508.6
4502.3
589.3
587.3
584.4
585.7
574.1
581.6
589.1
586.3
587.3
586.2
589.0
593.4
11.23
7.81
41.26
37.01
0.22
0.13
0.75
3.61
0.35
0.38
150.13
4.10
4.38
UATAP
HGIHEERING EMISSIONS
SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
P
P
P
P
T
T
T
T
S
T
T
I
T
11.23
7.81
41.26
37.01
0.22
0.13
0.75
3.61
0.35
0.38
150.13
4.10
4.38
3.784.47
A APEDS 01/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY UIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313). the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTU Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table 111-5-13: 1.1.1-Trichloroethi
FACILITY NAME
AKZO CHEMICALS WC.
ALLIED SIGNAL INC
ALPHA METALS INC
ASHLAND CHEMICAL INC.
ATLANTIC METAL PRODUCTS, INC.
ATLANTIC MEFAL PRODUCTS INC
AURACHEM CORP
A.K. STAMPING CO INC
BAGCRAFT CORP OF AMERICA
BAYONNE TERMINALS INC.
BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES
BLOCK DRUG CO INC.
BOftDEN INC CHEMICAL D1V
BOROUGH Of CARTERET POTW
BOXAL INC.
BRINTEC CORP
CAPTIVE PLASTICS
CENTRIC CLUTCH CO.
CITY OF BATON HE POTW
CITY OF ELIZABETH POTW
> CITY OF HOBOKEN POTW
^j CHI OF LINDEN POTW
"Ji CITY OF HEW BRUNSWICK POTU
CITY OF ORANGE DPW POTU
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POTW
COOK'S INDUSTRIAL LUBRICANTS INC
CORONA LIGHTING (DIV OF UGHTOUER)
CYCLE CHEM INC.
OELEET MERCHANDISING CORP
DOWER FINISHING t RESEARCH CO.
ORANETZ TECHNOLOGIES
DREW CHEMICAL
ine point source inventory
STREET ADDRESS
MEADOW ROAC
10 NORTH AVE EAST
600 ROUTE 440
1106 HARRISON AVENUE
600 NORTH UNION AVE
21 FADEM ROAD
SO. 3RD & SOMERSET ST
1159 ROUTE 22
10 H1NUE AVE
2ND STREET & HOBART AVE.
600 MOUNTAIN AVENUE
1 NEW ENGLAND AVENUE
930 LINCOLN BLVD
399 ROOSEVELT AVE
5 BASSE TT COURT
1010 JERSEY AVE
251 CIRCLE DRIVE NORTH
MAIN STREET AT ROUTE 9
630 AVE C
94 WASHINGTON STREET
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
260 HIGH STREET
5 NORTH STILES STREET
3 KILMER ROAD
217 SOUTH FIRST ST
26 BLANCHARD ST
53-61 2ND AVENUE
1000 HEW DURHAM RO
1106 HARRISON AVE
CITY
EDISON
ELIZABETH
JERSEY CITY
KEARNY
HILLSIDE
SPRINGFIELD
HARRISON
MOUNT AIMS] DE
CARTERET
BAYONNE
HEW PROVIDENCE
PI SCAT AWAY
MIDDLESEX
CARTERET
CRANBURY
HEW BRUNSWICK
PISCATAWAY
UOODBRIDGE
BAYONNE
ELIZABETH
HOBOCEN
LINDEN
NEW BRUNSWICK
ORANGE
PERTH AHBOY
LIKDEH
EDISON
ELIZABETH
NEWARK
KEARNY
EDISON
KEARNY
ZIP UTH
CODE NORTHING
08817
07201
07304
07032
07205
07081
07029
07092
0700B
07002
07974
08354
08846
07008
08512
08902
OB854
07095
07002
07207
07030
07036
08903
07051
08861
07036
08817
07206
07105
07032
08818
07032
4482.1
4501.3
4506.9
4511.1
4505.4
4503.7
4510.0
4503.2
4504.6
4499.7
4503.6
4487.2
4491.2
4491.6
4471 .6
4480.2
4489.5
4488.7
4499.7
4503.1
4511.5
4505.3
4482.9
4510.8
4483.1
4299.0
4485.4
4299.0
4508.9
4512.0
4483.9
4510.8
FACILITY^
WIDE
UTH EMISSIONS
EASTING
-------
Table 111-5-13: 1.1,1-Trichloroet
FACILITY NAME
DUREX INC
EASTERN STEEL BARREL CORP
ELASTIC STOP NUT CO
ELECTRICAL INDUSTRIES CORP
ELUABETHTOWN WATER COMPANY
EM INDUSTRIES INC.
ENGELHARD CORP
EXXON BAYUAY REFINERY
E.F. BRITTEN t CO
E.R. SQUIBB t SONS
FERGUSON PROPELLER INC
GARY SCREW MACHINE CORP
GORDON TERMINAL SERVICE CO.
HARVARD INDUSTRIES
tf HATCO CORP
vo HUDSON TOOL I DIE CO
°* HUFFMAN KOOS
H.B. FULLER CO
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES
IRONBOUND METAL PRODUCTS INC.
JAFCO INDUSTRIES INC.
JOHN B MOORE CORPORATION
LINDEN ROSELLE POTU
LiR MANUFACTURING CO.
MACY/BAMBERGER'S FURNITURE DIST.
MAR I SOL INC. CHEM. DIV.
METEX CORP.
MICRO STAMPING CORP
MICROWAVE SEMICONDUCTOR CORP
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 1
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 2
MIDEAST ALUMINUM INDUSTRIES INC.
hane point source inventory (continued)
STREET ADDRESS CITY
5 STAHUBER AVENUE
4100 NEW BRUNSWICK AVE
675 CENTRAL AVE
MORRIS AVE t, RT 22
FOOT OF EAST 21ST STREET
700 BLAIR ROAD
1400 PARK AVE
22 SOUTH AVE
ROUTE 1 I COLLEGE FARM RD.
1132 CLINTON ST
1010 JERSEY AVENUE
FOOT OF HOOK ROAD
2330 VAUXHALL ROAD
KING GEORGE POST ROAD
18 MALVERN STREET
1800 LOWER ROAD
59 BRUNSWICK AVE
CULVER ROAD
212 WRIGHT STREET
131 LINCOLN BLVD
ROUTE 9 AT PARKWAY
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
FOOT OF JOHN HAY AVENUE
401 CLEARVIEW ROAD
125 FACTORY LANE
970 NEW DURHAM RD
71 NEWARK WAY
100 SCHOOL HOUSE RD
CHEVALIER AVE
ROUTE 130
UNION
PI SCAT AWAY
UNION TOWNSHIP
HURRAY HILL
UNION
BAYONHE
CARTERET
LINDEN
CRAWFORD
NORTH BRUNSWICK
HOBOKEN
NEW BRUNSWICK
BAYONNE
UNION
FORDS
NEWARK
LINDEN
EDISON
SOUTH BRUNSWICK
NEWARK
MIDDLESEX
SAYREVILLE
LINDEN
KEARNY
EDISON
MIDDLESEX
EDISON
MAPLEWOOD
SOMERSET
SAYREVILLE
SOUTH BRUNSWICK
ZIP
CODE
07083
08854
07083
07974
07083
07002
07008
07036
07016
08902
07030
08903
07002
07083
08863
07015
07036
08818
07114
08846
08872
07036
07032
08837
08846
08818
07040
08873
08872
08810
UTM
NORTHING
4506.1
4487.6
4505.2
4501 .3
4492.6
4497.9
4500.0
4480.1
4510.5
4479.9
4500.6
4505.3
4485.6
4508.9
4495.8
4487.3
4469.3
4507.0
4491.7
4481 .8
4495.0
4512.7
4486.1
4489.9
4487.5
4507.2
4485.7
4481.0
4483.0
4469.4
FACILITYF
WIDE
UTM EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
560.7
547.3
550.5
574.9
564.0
567.4
558.4
547.5
581.7
544.1
576.2
561.5
557.8
572.2
564.7
549.2
540.8
567.7
542.9
559.4
567.1
572.4
557.1
540.9
553.3
559.0
538.5
563.3
550.8
542.4
0.13
0.25
19.85
0.25
0.38
5.00
3.94
0.13
46.71
19.85
1.10
0.01
1.73
0.06
6.85
1.70
4.95
12.35
61.13
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
fTPY) (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
0.05
0.04
0.09
0.95
3.21
14.45
7.39
2.52
0.12
0.02
3.67
0.09
0.49
1.87
0.23
1.60
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
P
T
T
T
P
P
0.13
0.25
19.85
0.25
0.04
0.09
0.38
5.00
3.94
0.95
0.13
46.71
14.45
19.85
1.10
0.01
2.52
1.73
0.12
0.02
3.67
0.09
0.06
0.49
1.87
0.23
6.85
1.70
4.95
12.35
61.13
1.60
1 1,1.1-Trichloroethane was not evaluated in ASES.
A APEDS 01/25/90 • permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSOEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
3 SOURCE LEGEND: A * APEOS; E « Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table 111-5-13; 1,1,1-Trichloroethane point source inventory (continued)
I
FACILITY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
CITY
MOHAWK LABORATORIES OF NJ
MON-ECO INDUSTRIES INC.
NAMES FINISHING ASSEMBLY CORP.
NATIONAL MANUFACTURING CO
NATIONAL STARCH & CHEMICAL
NATIONAL STARCH t CHEMICAL CORP
NORTH AMERICAN PHILLIPS LIGHTING
OAK1TE PRODUCTS INC
OHAUS CORP
OKONITE CO PLANT #3
OLD BRIDGE POTU
PARAMOUNT PLATING CO INC
PARKER HANNIFIN CORPORATION
PRIVATE FORMULATIONS INC.
P.O. OIL ft CHEMICAL STORAGE, INC.
RAHUAY VALLEY SA POTW
RBH DISPERSIONS INC.
RED DEVIL INC
REVLON INC.
REVLON INC.
RONA PEARL
SCHERING CORP
SIMPLEX CEILING CORP
SLI AVIONJC SYSTEMS CORP
SOLAR COMPOUNDS CORP.
SOMERSET-RARITAH VALLEY POTU
SOUTH BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP
SPRINGFIELD METAL PRODUCTS CO
STEEL CRAFT FLUORESCENT CO.
TECHNICAL WIRE PRODUCTS
TECKttIT INC
STOUTS LANE
5 JOANNA CT.
305 THIRD AVE WEST
12 RIVER ROAD
225 BELLEVILLE AVENUE
1735 WEST FRONT STREET
1764 NEW DURHAM ROAD
700 MIDDLESEX AVE
29 HANOVER RD
1600 US ROUTE 1
OLD WATER WORKS ROAD
1501 WEST ELIZABETH AVE
601 NASSAU STREET
460 PLAINFIELD AVENUE
FOOT OF EAST 22ND STREET
1050 EAST HAZELWOOO AVE
L-5 FACTORY LN
2400 VAUXHALL RD
60 STULTS ROAD
196 COIT ST
4 HOOK ROAD
2000 GALLOPING HILL RO
50 HARRISON ST
7-11 VREELAMD ROAD
1201 W. BLANCKE ST
POLHEMUS AVE
RT.522 t DAYTON-JAMESBURG
8 COMMERCE STREET
191 HURRAY STREET
129 OERHOOY ST
135 BRYANT AVE
MONMOUTH JUNCTION
EAST BRUNSWICK
NEWARK
CHATHAM
BLOOMFIELD
PLAINFIELD
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
METUCHEN
FLORHAM PARK
NORTH BRUNSWICK
OLD BRIDGE
LINDEN
NORTH BRUNSWICK
EDISON
BAYONNE
RAHWAY
MIDDLESEX
UNION
DAYTON
IRVINGTON
BAYONNE
KENILWORTH
HOBOKEN
FLORHAH PARK
LINDEN
BRIDGEWATER
RD DAYTON
SPRINGFIELD
NEWARK
CRANFORD
CRANFORD
08852
08816
07107
07928
07003
07063
07080
08840
07932
08902
08857
07036
08902
088404
07002
07065
08846
07083
08810
07111
07002
07033
07030
07932
07036
08807
08810
07081
07114
07016
07016
4469.8
4477.0
4512.5
4508.5
4516.5
4492.2
4492. 0
4486.7
4515.3
4477.8
4478.6
4497.8
4479.2
485.7
4500.9
4492.8
4488.6
4506.2
4299.0
4500.5
4503.0
4507.1
4515.4
4496.8
4489.0
4469.0
4508.3
4500.1
4500.3
FACILITY
WIDE
ZIP UTM UTH EMISSIONS
CODE NORTHING EASTING (TPY)
536.5
550.4
568.9
552.2
568.3
545.8
551.0
555.1
552.1
552.4
564.9
563.2
544.4
549.5
575.9
566.9
542.2
560.9
599.0
575.2
560.3
583.9
553.1
562.3
536.6
541.8
570.2
560.9
560.6
30
25
1.05
0.19
0.25
3.45
16.53
0.52
0.93
0.25
15.05
15.25
0.25
10.74
7.00
2.53
7.50
0.17
21.50
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TRY) (TPr> SOURCE3 (TRY)
0.75
3.23
0.48
0.05
0.52
4.16
67.14
0.02
2.29
3.00
1.15
2.10
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
P
P
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
P
T
2.30
0.25
0.75
1.05
3.23
0.19
0.48
0.25
3.45
16.53
0.52
0.05
0.52
4.16
67.14
0.93
0.25
15.05
0.02
15.25
0.25
10.74
7.00
2.53
7.50
0.17
2.29
3.00
1.15
21.50
2.10
1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane was not evaluated in ASES.
A APEDS 01/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI {SARA 313). the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
VO
00
Table IU-5-VJ: 1.1.1-Trichloroeth
FACILITY NAME
THERHONATIONAL IND
(LR KETAL TREATING DIV.)
TOPCO INC
TOWN OF KEARNY POTU
TOWN OF LIVINGSTON POTU
TOWNSHIP OF UOOOBRIDGE POTU 1
TOWNSHIP OF UOOOBRIDGE POTU 2
TRYCO TOOL ft NFC
TIE INDUSTRIES INC.
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
U.S. FUJI ELECTRIC
VAN WATERS ft ROGERS INC.
WEBCRAFT CHEMICALS, CRAIG ADHESIVE
26TH WARD POTU
EDISON PRICE INC
FELDWARE IHC
INDUSTRIAL FINISHING PRODUCTS
INDUSTRIAL FINISHING PRODUCTS
INDUSTRIAL FINISHING PRODUCTS
NEUTOUN CREEK POTU
OWLS HEAD POTU
PERFECT FINISHING CO
PORT RICHMOND POTU
RASKO
RED HOOK POTU
UNITED RESIN PRODUCTS INC
lane point source inventory (continued)
STREET ADDRESS CITY
3651 SO CLINTON AVE
107 TRUNSULL STREET
39 CENTRAL AVE
CLIFF ROAD
1 MAIM STREET
363 SOUTH JEFFERSON ST
215 WATCHUNG AVENUE
350 ROOSEVELT AVENUE
240 CIRCLE DRIVE NORTH
160 ESSEX AVENUE EAST
80 UHEELER POINT ROAD
HENDR1X ST/JAMAICA BAY
409 EAST 60TH ST
250 AVE U
465 LOGAN STREET
320-340 REttSEN AVE
214 40TH ST
329-369 GREENPOINT AVE
BAY RIDGE AVE/THE NARROWS
200 VARICK ST
1801 RICHMOND TERRACE
1704 MCDONALD AVE
MARSHALL ST/LITTLE ST
100 SUTTON STREET
SOUTH PL A IMF I ELD
ELIZABETH
KEARNY
LIVINGSTON
SEWAREN
UOOOBRIDGE
ORANGE
ORANGE
CARTERET
PISCATAUAY
UOOOBRIDGE
NEWARK
BROOKLYN
MANHATTAN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
MANHATTAN
STATEN ISLAND
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
ZIP
CODE
07080
07206
07032
07039
07077
07095
07050
07050
07008
08854
07095
07105
10022
11223
11208
11236
11232
10014
11230
11222
UTM
NORTHING
4490.2
4499.9
4507.2
4517.7
4489.2
4484.6
4513.7
4514.6
4492.0
4487.9
4491.7
4508.9
4500.1
4512.2
4494.1
4512.9
4512.9
4512.9
4509.0
4498.7
4482.9
4499.1
4497.4
4506.4
4508.5
FACILITYF
WIDE
UTH EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
548.3
569.1
574.9
555.6
563.5
558.9
563.7
564.8
566.3
543.3
562.4
572.2
595.2
587.7
586.9
587.2
587.2
587.2
587.3
581.6
542.4
573.8
587.4
586.3
588.3
15.01
6.50
0.74
0.49
0.44
0.17
4.75
4.62
4.98
0.42
10.53
0.13
0.10
0.05
0.01
7.26
35.29
4.75
1.03
16.22
4.28
0.13
1 1,1,1-Trichloroethane was not evaluated in ASES.
* APEDS 01/25/90 - pemit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
APEDS*
(TPY)
0.15
0.44
0.20
UATAP
NGINEERING EMISSIONS
SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
T
T
P
P
P
P
T
A
A
T
A
T
P
T
T
T
T
T
P
P
T
P
T
P
T
15.01
6.50
0.74
0.49
0.44
0.17
4.75
0.15
0.44
4.62
0.20
4.98
0.42
10.53
0.13
0.10
0.05
0.01
7.26
35.29
4.75
1.03
16.22
4.28
0.13
653.00
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSOEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTU Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
iw
T
so
VO
Table 1 11-5-14: TrichloroethyLene
FACILITY NAME
ALLIED-SIGNAL INC
AT&T TECHNOLOGIES INC.
BAYONNE TERMINALS INC.
BOROUGH OF CARTERET POTU
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 1
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 2
CITY OF BAYONUE POTU
CITY OF ELIZABETH POTU
CITY OF HOBOKEN POTU
CITY OF LINDEN POTU
CITY OF NEU BRUNSWICK POTU
CITY OF ORANGE DPU POTU
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POTU
CYCLE CHEN INC.
ELIZABETHTOUN UATER COMPANY
ELIZABETHTOUN UATER COMPANY
ELIZABETHTOUN UATER COMPANY
ENGELHARD CORP
E.ft. SQUIBB & SONS
GENERAL PLASTICS - DIV OF PMC INC.
GIBSON ASSOCIATES, INC
GORDON TERMINAL SERVICE CO.
HUDSON TOOL & DIE CO
JAHES8URG SCHOOL FOR BOYS POTU
JOHN B MOORE CORPORATION
JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX-UNION POTU
KIN-BUC, INC
LINDEN ROSELLE POTU
LINPRO COMPANY POTU, THE
MARISOL INC. CHEM. DIV.
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 1
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 2
point source inventory
STREET ADDRESS
10 NORTH AVE EAST
100 CENTRAL AVE.
2ND STREET & HOB ART AVE.
399 ROOSEVELT AVE
630 AVE C
94 WASHINGTON STREET
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
260 HIGH STREET
217 SOUTH FIRST ST.
CHARLES STREET
NORTH AVENUE
MORRIS AVE & RT 22
700 BLAIR ROAD
ROUTE 1 t COLLEGE FARM RD.
55 LAFRANCE AVE.
90 MYRTLE STREET
FOOT OF HOOK ROAD
18 MALVERN STREET
ROUTE 9 AT PARKWAY
500 SOUTH FIRST STREET
MEADOW ROAD
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
125 FACTORY LANE
CHEVALIER AVE
CITY
ELIZABETH
KEARHY
BAYONNE
CARTERET
BAYONNE
ELIZABETH
HOBOKEN
LINDEN
NEU BRUNSUICK
ORANGE
PERTH AMBOY
ELIZABETH
MOUNTAINSIDE
PLAINFIELD
UNION
CARTERET
NORTH BRUNSUICK
BLOOHFIELD
CR AN FORD
BAYONNE
NEUARK
SAYREVILLE
ELIZABETH
EDISON
LINDEN
MIDDLESEX
SAYREVILLE
ZIP UTM
CODE NORTHING
07201
07032
07002
07008
07002
07207
07030
07036
08903
07051
08861
07206
07092
07061
07083
07008
08902
07003
07016
07002
07015
08872
07202
08817
07036
08846
08872
4501.3
4508.8
4499.7
4491.6
4479.3
4480.5
4499.7
4503.1
4511.5
4505.3
4482.9
4510.8
4483.1
4299.0
4502.6
4497.0
4492.6
4480.1
4514.4
4499.8
4500.6
4508.9
4465.0
4481.8
4498.4
4481.2
4495.0
4464.0
4489.9
4481.0
4483.0
FACILITYF
U1DE
UTM EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
570.2
575.0
574.4
566.7
563.2
560.0
574.8
568.3
583.0
563.4
543.8
563.3
561.1
599.0
555.2
549.2
564.0
547.5
568.3
560.3
576.2
572.2
552.0
559.4
567.9
552.5
567.1
533.2
540.9
563.3
550.8
0.11
0.51
0.76
0.66
0.37
0.58
0.24
0.19
0.00
52.88
10.67
0.36
3.30
5.45
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY) (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
0.62
0.14
0.22
0.93
0.40
0.06
0.22
0.02
56.94
0.86
9.67
0.47
0.46
0.00
0.13
1.97
0.16
0.07
NO1
NO
ND
3.22
0.09
46.79
7.47
0.46
57.65
0.04
A
A
A
E P
E
E
P
E P
P
E P
E P
P
E P
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
T
A
A T
E
A
E P
A
E
E
A T
E P
E P
0.62
0.14
0.22
0.11
0.16
0.07
0.51
0.76
0.66
0.37
0.58
0.24
0.19
0.93
0.40
0.06
0.22
0.02
56.94
0.86
0.00
9.67
52.88
0.09
0.46
10.67
0.00
7.47
0.46
0.13
3.30
5.45
"NO" means no data from which air emissions may be estimated.
A APEDS 12/28/89 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
r FACILITY UIDE EMISSIONS means data from TR1 (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A - APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTU Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table 111-5-14: Trichtoroethvlene
FACILITY NAME
MULBERRY METAL PRODUCTS INC.
NATIONAL MANUFACTURING CO
OLD BRIDGE MUA BROWN TOWN POTW
OLD BRIDGE POTW
PEERLESS TUBE CO.
PERK CHEMICAL CO., INC.
POLYMER EXTRUDED PRODUCTS
P.O. OIL & CHEMICAL STORAGE, INC.
RAHWAY VALLEY SA POTU
SOLVENTS RECOVERY SERVICE OF M
SOMERSET -RAR I TAN VALLEY POTU
SOUTH AMBOY POTW
STOLT TERMINALS INC
TELEDYNE ADAMS
TOWN OF KEARNY POTU
TOWN OF LIVINGSTON POTU
TOUNSHIP OF BERKELEY HGHTS UPC POTU
TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE POTW 1
TOUNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE POTU 2
U.S. FUJI ELECTRIC
WCI HOME COMFORT DIV
WEBCRAFT CHEMICALS, CRAIG ADHESIVE
WEBCRAFT TECHNOLOGIES
WEBCRAFT TECHNOLOGIES
26TH WARD POTW
CONEY ISLAND POTW
NEWTOWN CREEK POTW
OWLS HEAD POTW
PORT RICHMOND POTW
RED HOOK POTW
point source inventory (continued)
STREET ADDRESS CITY
2199 STANLEY TERR
12 RIVER ROAO
OLD WATER WORKS ROAD
58 LOCUST AVE.
297 FERRY STREET
FOOT OF EAST 22ND STREET
1050 EAST HAZELUOQO AVE
POLHEMUS AVE
920 STATE STREET
1110 SPRINGFIELD RD
39 CENTRAL AVE
CLIFF ROAD
1 MAIN STREET
240 CIRCLE DRIVE NORTH
2170 HWY 27
80 WHEELER POINT ROAD
225 FORREST AVE
U.S. RTE. #1 ADAMS STATION
HENDRIX ST/JAMAICA BAY
AVE Z/KNAPP ST
329-69 GREENPOINT AVE
BAY RIDGE AVE/THE NARROWS
1801 RICHMOND TERRACE
MARSHALL ST/LITTLE ST
UK ION
CHATHAM
OLD BRIDGE
BLOOMFIELD
ELIZABETH
NEWARK
BAYONNE
RAHWAV
LINDEN
BRIDGEWATER
SOUTH AMBOY
PERTH AMBOY
UNION
KEARNY
LIVINGSTON
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
SEWAREN
WOOOBRIDGE
PISCATAWAY
EDISON
NEWARK
METUCHEN
NORTH BRUNSWICK
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
BROOKLYN
ZIP
CODE
07083
07928
08857
07003
07207
07105
07002
07065
07036
08807
08879
08862
07083
07032
07039
07922
07077
07095
08854
08818
07105
08840
08902
UTM
NORTHING
4505.1
4508.5
4472.1
4478.6
4515.1
4499.8
4508.5
4500.9
4492.8
4496.0
4489.0
4481.0
4484.8
4504.5
4507.2
4517.7
4503.4
4489.2
4484.6
4487.9
4486.5
4508.9
4486.8
4476.7
4500.1
4490.6
4509.0
4498.7
4499.1
4506.4
FACILITYF
WIDE
UTM EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
561.3
552.2
558.8
564.9
567.1
568.5
571.8
575.9
566.9
563.2
536.6
560.0
561.3
559.0
574.9
555.6
546.6
563.5
558.9
543.3
552.2
572.2
552.4
542.9
595.2
590.4
587.3
581.6
573.8
586.3
19.23
18.05
0.14
0.13
2.54
0.15
16.90
0.20
0.13
0.12
0.05
12.03
54.62
5.04
5.09
7.02
0.72
1.05
7.55
0.13
0.13
1.14
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
^TPY) (TPY) SOURCE3 (TPY)
T
T
0.24 E
0.63 E P
6.65 A
0.01 E
T
7.97 A
18.96 E P
0.10 E
P
0.69 E
0.16 A
1.30 A T
P
P
1.25 E
3.43 E P
0.83 E P
3.43 A T
0.40 A T
P
P
P
P
P
P
19.23
18.05
0.24
0.14
6.65
0.01
0.13
7.97
2.54
0.10
0.15
0.69
0.16
16.90
0.20
0.13
1.25
0.12
0.05
12.03
54.62
5.04
5.09
7.02
0.72
1.05
7.55
0.13
0.13
1.14
1 "NO" means no data from which air emissions nay be estimated.
A APEDS 12/28/89 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
323.86
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TR1 (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
8 SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region [I POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table III-5-15: Xylenes (mixed isomers) point source inventory
FACILITY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
CITY
ABLOH FINISHES INC.
ACCURATE BUSHING CO INC
AOCO CHEMICAL CO.
ADVANCE FOILS INC
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC.
A1R-0-PLASTIK CORP.
AICZO CHEMICALS INC.
ALCAN ALUMINUM CORP
ALCAN BUILDING PRODUCTS
ALLIED PROCESSING CORPORATION
ALPHA ASSOCIATES INC.
ALSTEW
AMERADA HESS CORP.
AMERICAN ABRASIVE METALS CO.
AMERICAN CYANAMID CO
AMERICAN FINISHING & SPRAY CO IttC
AMERICAN LEATHER MFG. CO.
AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN CO.
AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN CO.
AMERICAN NATIONAL CAN CO.
ANT I HYDRO CO.
ARNOLD DESKS INC
ASHLAND CHEMICAL CO
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS
A.J. JERSEY INC.
& t B CUSTOM CABINETS
BENJAMIN MOORE t, CO. - NEWARK
BESSEMER PROCESSING CO, INC
BETHAH CORP., THE
BORDEN INC
BOXAL INC.
84 UAYDELL ST
BOO JEFFERSON AVE
49 RUTHERFORD ST
800 BOND ST
172 BAEICELAND AVE
ISO FIELDCREST AVE
MEADOW ROAD
901 LEHIGH AVE
11 CRAGUOOD RD
1050 COMMERCE AVE
2 AMBOY AVE
34 EXCHANGE PLACE
750 CLIFF RD
460 COIT ST
4900 TREHLET POINT
135 NJ RAILROAD AVE
2195 ELIZABETH AVE
135 NATIONAL RO
108 PIERSON AVE
GEORGES RD
265-277 BADGER AVE
1409 CHESTNUT AVE
221 FOUNDRY ST
21 COLONIAL DR
1515 E. L1NOEM AVE
720 LINCOLN BLVD
134 LISTER AVE
133 HAYNES AVE
LINCOLN BLVD & RIVER RD
930 LINCOLN BLVD
5 BASSETT COURT
FACILITY1"
WIDE
ZIP UTH UTN EMISSIONS
CODE NORTHING EASTING (TPY)
ENGINEERING
APEOSA SCIENCE
(TPY) (TPY) SOURCE3
NEWARK
UNION
NEWARK
ELIZABETH
MIDDLESEX
ED I SOU
EDISON
UNION
WOCOBRIDGE
UNION
UOOOBRIDGE
JERSEY CITY
PORT READING
IRVINGTOH
LINDEN
NEWARK
RAHWAY
EDISON
EDISON
MONMOUTH JUNCTION
NEWARK
HILLSIDE
NEWARK
PISCATAWAY
LINDEN
MIDDLESEX
NEWARK
NEWARK
MIDDLESEX
MIDDLESEX
CRANBURY
07105
07083
07105
07201
08846
08837
08817
07063
07095
07083
07075
07302
07064
07111
07036
07105
07065
08817
08818
08852
07108
07205
07114
08854
07036
07023
07105
07114
08846
08846
08512
4509.7
4504.2
4506.7
4501.0
4490.2
4485.6
4482.1
4503.1
4489.9
4505.8
4487.7
4490.0
4506.5
4494.2
4508.5
4495.8
4485.9
4486.1
4473.1
4505.4
45Q6.4
4508.5
4488.6
4499.5
4509.8
4505.3
4486.4
4491.2
4471.6
570.5
559.0
572.7
568.3
542.0
556.2
552.2
563.6
560.7
560.6
561.4
564.0
562.8
567.3
569.9
561.9
552.5
555.3
541.3
567.7
564.7
573.1
545.1
564.8
573.2
568.4
540.4
542.3
545.8
0.13
1.53
5.63
10.26
46.50
13.85
6.70
10.83
9.87
0.50
0.08
0.62
0.66
0.12
0.21
2.08
0.15
6.97
1.30
2.33
0.12
1999.40
0.24
16. Z6
3.62
0.02
190.75
3.68
0.12
1.78
1.71
0.08
0.02
0.03
0.44
64.00
1.20
UATAP
EMISSIONS
INVENTORY
(TPY)
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
0.13
0.12
1.53
2.08
0.15
5.63
6.97
1.30
10.26
0.12
46.50
0.24
13.85
6.70
16.26
3.62
10.83
0.02
9.87
3.68
0.50
1.78
1.71
0.08
0.02
0.03
0.08
64.00
0.62
1.20
0.66
APEDS 01/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; £ = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table UI-5-tt: Xvlenes (mixed i
(continued)
FACILITY NAME
BUSCH INC
CARDOLITE CORP.
CASCHEM INC.
CD I DISPERSION CORP.
CELLOMER 01V.
CHEMICAL WASTE MGMNT OF NJ INC
CHEM-FLEUR INC
CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY
CHICOPEE
CIBA-GEIGY CORP
COLUMBIA TERMINALS INC
CONSTRUCTION SPECIALTIES INC.
CON-LUX COATINGS INC.
CROMPTON t KHOULES CORP.
CROSSF1ELO PRODUCTS CORP
CROWN METAL FINISHING CO. INC.
CRYOFAB INC
DANIEL PRODUCTS CO.
DE DIETRICH USA INC
DECEN CO.
DELEET MERCHANDISING CORP.
DOCK RESINS CORP.
DOWER FINISHING t RESEARCH CO.
DRI PRINT FOILS INC.
DRUM SERVICE OF NEWARK INC
OURALAC INC.
DUREX INC
E I DUPONT DE NEMOURS 1 CO
somers) point source inventory
STREET ADDRESS CITY
3? DAVtS ST
500 DORERJS AVE
40 AVENUE A
27 HAYES AVE.
46 ALBERT AVE
100 LISTER AVE
200 PULASKI ST
SUMMIT AVENUE
2351 US ROUTE 130
556 MORRIS AVE
49 CENTRAL AVE
55 WINANS AVE
226 TALMADGE RO
52 AMSTERDAM ST
140 VALLEY ROAD
40 BORIGKT AVE
540 N MICHIGAN AVE
400 CLAREHONT AVE
US RT 22 UB & RR CROSS
200 KELLOG ST
26 BLANCHARD ST
1512 WEST ELIZABETH AVE
53-61 2ND AVENUE
329 NEW BRUNSWICK AVE
51 STANTON ST
B4 LISTER AVE
5 STAHUBER AVENUE
CHEESEQUAKE ROAD
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
NEWARK
BATONNE
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
SOUTH BRUNSWICK
SUMMIT
SOUTH KEARNY
CR AN FORD
EDISON
NEWARK
ROSELLE PARK
KEN1LWORTH
KEN1LWORTH
JERSEY CITY
UNION
JERSEY CITY
NEWARK
LINDEN
KEARNY
RAHUAY
NEWARK
NEWARK
UNION
SAYREVILLE
ZIP
CODE
07060
07105
07002
07114
07105
07105
07105
07922
07901
07032
07016
08818
07105
07204
07033
07033
07304
07083
07305
07105
07036
07032
07065
07105
07083
08872
UTM
NORTHING
4507.6
4499.8
4507.7
4509.5
4510.0
4507.8
4504.0
4468.7
4507.9
4507.0
4500.6
4487.6
4507.8
4501.1
4503.1
4503.8
4507.5
4504.7
4506.9
4508.9
4496.4
4512.0
4494.5
4508.1
4509.7
4506.1
4478.8
FACILITYF
WIDE
UTH EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
573.7
572.6
569.7
572.8
573.0
570.8
547.0
542.1
553.3
575.0
559.0
552.9
572.2
560.6
559.0
559.8
578.1
559.8
575.5
572.2
561.2
572.3
561.3
568.9
573.1
560.7
556.7
0.50
5.42
0.3B
2.20
5.93
4.43
0.03
17.21
0.75
0.25
0.01
0.03
15.65
0.3B
5.03
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDSA SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY) (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
0.05
0.15
5.80
9.00
28.88
0.01
0.16
1.60
0.06
0.26
3.10
0.08
0.40
2.18
0.01
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
0.23 A
T
6.96 T
8.39 T
9.00
70.67 T
0.65
T
5.54
73.14 T
0.05
0.50
5.42
0.33
2.20
0.01
0.16
1.60
0.06
0.26
3.10
5.93
4.43
0.03
0.40
17.21
0.01
0.75
0.23
0.25
0.01
0.03
9.00
15.65
0.65
0.38
5.54
5.03
APEOS 02/25/90 - pernit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton}.
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSOEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
8 SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table 111-5-15: Xvlenes (mixed iso
(continued)
FACILITY NAME
EASTERN STEEL BARREL CORP
ELAN CHEMICAL CO.
ENGLERT INC
EXXON BAYVAY REFINERY
EXXON COMPANY USA
EXXON CORP
FERRO MERCHANDISING EQUIPMENT CORP
FIRHENICH INC
FORD HOI OR CO EDISON ASSEMBLY PLT
GATX TERMINALS CORP.
GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP
GENERAL MOTORS CORP. CPC GROUP
GREEN BROOK CABINET SHOP
H REISMAN
HANDY STORE FIXTURES INC
HANSOHE ENERGY SYSTEMS INC
HATCO CORP
HEUBACH INC
HOWE LI ELECTRIC MOTORS
HUDSON COUNTY AREA VO-TECH SCHOOLS
!> HULS AMERICA, INC.
tl INDUSTRIAL PETROCHEMICALS CO INC
g INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES
INTERNATIONAL PAINT (USA) INC.
J B ROSS
JOHN C. DOLPH CO.
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO INC
KARNAK CHEMICAL CORP
mers) point source inventory
STREET ADDRESS
4100 NEW BRUNSWICK AVE
268 DOREHUS AVE
1200 AHBOY AVE
1400 PARK AVE
250 EAST 22ND STREET
1100 US ROUTE 1
690 WAINWRIGHT ST
928-964 DOREHUS AVE
939 U.S. RTE. *1
78 LAFAYETTE STREET
150 AVENEL ST.
1016 WEST EDGAR RD
260 WAGNER ST
377 CRANE ST
337 SHERMAN AVE
358 DALZIEL ROAD
KING GEORGE POST ROAD
HEUBACH AVE
900 NORTH AVE
525 MONTGOMERY ST
830 MAGNOLIA AVE
128 DOREMUS AVE
600 ROSE LANE
2270 MORRIS AVE
409 JOYCE KILMER AVE
NEU RD
U.S. HIGHWAY 1 & AARON ROAD
330 CENTRAL AVE
MPtl ITVF
CITY
PI SCAT Aim
NEWARK
PERTH AMBOY
LINDEN
BAYONNE
LINDEN
UNION
KEWARK
EDISON
CARTERET
UOOOBRIDGE
LINDEN
MIDDLESEX
ORANGE
NEWARK
LINDEN
FORDS
NEWARK
PIAIMFIELD
JERSEY CITY
ELIZABETH
NEWARK
UNION BEACH
UNION
NEW BRUNSWICK
HONHOUTH JUNCTION
NORTH BRUNSWICK
CLARK TWP
ZIP
CODE
08854
07105
08862
07036
07002
07036
07083
07105
08818
07008
07095
07036
08846
07050
07114
07036
08863
07114
07061
07030
07201
07105
07735
07083
08903
08852
08902
07066
UTM
NORTHING
4487.6
4508.2
4485.9
4497.9
4516.6
4498.5
4502.1
4505.6
4485.2
4492.7
4492.0
4496.2
4513.2
4508.2
4497.0
4485.6
4507.2
4507.8
4501.8
4508.8
4477.1
4505.1
4479.4
4469.6
4477.5
4498.2
UIN
EASTING
547.3
573.9
561.4
567.4
583.8
564.9
565.4
573.6
553.2
566.7
561.2
562.8
565.3
570.0
562.0
557.8
569.7
578.8
567.3
573.1
571.8
560.5
547.6
538.3
542.5
557.9
WIDE
ENGINEERING
EMISSIONS APEDS*
CTPY)
0.25
0.25
38.05
125.75
2.25
165.43
0.25
1.13
3.52
104.17
0.03
(IPY)
3.94
1.65
3.18
5.39
0.26
0.14
0.23
1140.68
0.15
DELC0.28)
0.06
10.07
1.85
0.98
0.04
0.25
6.97
0.05
1.87
0.04
1.54
0.14
0.60
26.38
58.08
SCIENCE
OPY) SOURCE
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
UATAP
EMISSIONS
S
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
INVENTORY
UPY1
0.25
0.25
3.18
38.05
5.39
0.26
0.14
0.23
125.75
0.15
2.25
165.43
0.06
10.07
1.85
0.98
0.04
0.25
6.97
0.05
1.87
0.04
0.25
1.13
0.60
3.52
104.17
0.03
APEDS 02/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredttis of a ton).
F FACILITY UIOE EMISSIONS Beans data from TRI (SARA J1J>, the NJfSOEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region M POTU Inventory.
s SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEDS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region M POTW Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
!>•
^*
Table 111-5-15: Xvlenes (Mixed isc
(continued)
FACILITY NAME
KOP-COAT INC.
(COP-COAT INC. (GAR WOOD PLANT)
LANIMA1RE CORP
LHJ STEEL PRODUCTS INC
HAAS ft UALDSTEIN CO.
MERCK & CO
HE TEX CORP
HID ATLANTIC CONTAINER CORP.
MOBIL CHEN CORP CHEH PRODUCTS DIV
NAMES FINISHING ASSEMBLY CORP.
NATIONAL CAN CORP
NEWARK INDUSTRIAL SPRAYING INC.
NEWPORT CITY DEVELOPMENT CO
NJE CORP
NOVIOC CHEMICALS
PARAMOUNT METAL FINISHING CO IMC
PENICK CORP.
PERMACEL
PETER A OROBACH CO INC
PMC. INC. (SPECIALTIES GROUP)
POWER DRAULICS-NIELSEN INC
PRO AUTO COLLISION INC
RAOEL LEATHER CO.
RBH DISPERSIONS INC.
mers) point source inventory
STREET ADDRESS CITY
480 FRELIHGHUYSEN AVE
449 SOUTH AVE
960 EAST HAZELUOOO AVE
550 9TH ST
2121 HC CARTER HUY
126 EAST LINCOLN AVE
970 NEW DURHAM RD
1200 U. BLANCKE ST
RIE. 27 & VINEYARD RD
305 THIRD AVE WEST
287 SOUTH RANDOLPH ROAD
12 AMSTERDAM STREET
145 12TH STREET
CULVER RD
181-183 EHHETT ST
1515 WEST ELIZABETH AVE
158 MOUNT OLIVET AVE
U.S. RTE. #1
US HIGHWAY 22 & BALL AVE
INDUSTRIAL AVE.
670 E LINCOLN AVE
37 PARK STREET
849 BROADWAY
L-5 FACTORY LN
NEWARK
UESTFIELD
RAHUAY
HOBOKEN
NEWARK
RAHUAY
EDISON
LINDEN
EDISON
NEWARK
PI SCAT AWAY
NEWARK
JERSEY CITY
DAYTON
NEWARK
LINDEN
NEWARK
NORTH BRUNSWICK
UN 1CW
FORDS
RAHWAY
ORANGE
NEWARK
MIDDLESEX
ZIP
CODE
07114
07090
07065
07030
07104
07065
08818
07036
08818
07107
08854
07105
07372
08810
07036
07114
08902
07083
08863
07065
07050
07104
08846
UTH
NORTHING
4505
4499
4494
4511
4514
4495
4487
4496
4486
4512
4489
4501
4508
4468
4507
4496
4504
4479
4504
4484
4513
4488
.8
.8
.0
.0
.0
.7
.5
.9
.7
.5
.6
.6
.9
.2
.6
.4
.4
.6
.4
.5
.5
.6
FACILITY
WIDE
UTM EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
568.1
556.3
561.2
581.6
571.6
562 .A
553.3
564.4
552.3
568.9
545.4
570.4
581.3
539.3
569.9
562.2
567.2
546.7
560.0
557.2
571.0
542.2
14.30
7.10
1.91
7.78
4.71
5.25
46.08
34.00
2.51
UATAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
(TPY> (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
1
3
1
0
5
0
293
2
1
0
0
1
0
3
0
311
0
0
2
0
0
.31 A T 14.30
.07 A T 7.10
.15 A 1.15
.82 A 0.62
T 1.91
.50 A 5.50
.57 A 0.57
T 7.78
.59
.43
.49
.66
.13
.50
.02
.42
.24
.76
.01
.03
.71
T 4-71
2.43
1.49
T 5.25
0.13
1.50
0.02
3.42
0.24
T 46.08
0.01
0.03
2.71
.20 A 0.20
T 34.00
.17 A T 2.51
APEOS 02/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSDEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTW Inventory.
3 SOURCE LEGEttO: A = APEOS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTW Inventory; S = SHS; T = TRI.
-------
Table 1 11 -S- IS: Xylenes (mixed iso
{continued)
FACILITY NAME
REDOAWAY MFG. CO. INC.
REICHHOLD CHEMICALS INC.
RELIANCE ELECTRIC CO
RUSSEL STANLEY EAST INC.
SAFETY -KLEEN CORP
SERVILLO ASSOCIATES INC
SETON CO. RADEL TANNING DIV.
SILVER LINE BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP
SPENCER KELLOGG PRODUCTS
STACOR CORP.
STEEL CRAFT FLUORESCENT CO.
STRATUS PETROLEUM CORP
TENAX FINISHING PRODUCTS CO.
TRANSFER PRINT FOILS INC.
TREMLEY POINT INDUSTRIES
TRUE VALUE AUTO BODY ft PAINTING CO
UNION CARBIDE CORP BOUND BROOK PLT
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
WARNER MFC CORP
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP
f WHITE CHEMICAL CORP.
f- WHITTAKER CORP NO. BRUNSWICK DIV
2 WILLIAM GRANT & SONS INC
mers) point source inventory
STREET ADDRESS CITY
32 EUCLID AVE.
726 ROCKEFELLER STREET
165 FIELDCREST AVE
CONVERY BLVD
1200 SYLVAN STREET
34 EXCHANGE PLACE
849 BROADWAY
207 POND AVE
400 DOREHUS AVE
285 EMMET ST
191 MURRAY STREET
678 DOREHUS AVE
390 ADAMS ST
9 COTTERS LN
4700 TREMLEY POINT RD
744-748 COMHUNIPAW AVE
1 RIVER ROAD
350 ROOSEVELT AVENUE
100 3RD AVE
1447 CHESTNUT AVE
660 FRELINGHUYSEN AVE
1430-1470 JERSEY AVE
130 FIELDCREST AVE
NEWARK
ELIZABETH
EDISON
WOODBRIDGE
LINDEN
JERSEY CITY
NEWARK
MIDDLESEX
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
EAST BRUNSWICK
LINDEN
JERSEY CITY
PISCATAUAY
CARTERET
KEARNY
HILLSIDE TUP
NEWARK
NORTH BRUNSWICK
EDISON
ZIP UTM
CODE NORTHING
07105
07202
08818
07095
07036
07303
07104
08846
07105
07114
07114
07105
07114
08816
07036
07304
08854
07008
07032
07205
07114
08902
08817
4508.9
4497.9
4486.7
4495.9
4507.5
4513.5
4492.0
4507.5
4507.7
4508.3
4506.3
4507.3
4477.2
4494.9
4508.2
4488.7
4492.0
4512.2
4507.7
4480.2
4485.6
FACILITY1"
WIDE
UTM EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
572.2
567.7
546.9
563.3
581.7
571.0
544.0
573.9
569.6
570.2
574.0
570.6
549.3
566.7
577.6
540.7
566.3
572.4
569.7
543.9
556.0
17.50
4.13
28.34
15.54
0.25
10.84
0.87
3.32
5.37
0.41
1.93
IMTAP
ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
APEDSA SCIENCE INVENTORY
^TPYJ (TPY) SOURCE3 (TPY)
9.87
0.45
7.51
0.03
0.25
0.53
3.23
0.03
0.92
1.02
0.01
0.02
0.08
9.13
4.90
0.72
0.10
0.03
0.04
0.05
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
17.50
4.13
0.45
28.34
0.03
0.25
15.54
0.53
0.25
10.84
0.03
0.92
0.87
3.32
0.02
0.08
5.37
4.90
0.72
0.10
0.41
1.93
0.05
APEDS 02/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate
-------
T»We m-5-lS: Kylenes Imned i
(continued)
FACILITY NAME
WOOD TEXTURES INC.
U.A.S. TERMINALS INC.
ACHE STEEL PARTITION CO
COLONIAL MIRROR AND GLASS
FYN PAINT I LACQUER CO
GLOSS FLO CORP
HARCO CHEMICAL COATINGS
INDUSTRIAL FINISHING PRODUCTS
INDUSTRIAL FINISHING PRODUCTS
INDUSTRIAL FINISHING PRODUCTS
JEFSTEEL BUSINESS EQUIP
MARK CABINET CORP
PYRAMID PAINT PRODUCTS
i&oners) point source inventory
STREET ADDRESS CITY
300 HCGAU DR
126 PASSAIC STREET
513 PORTER AVE
142 19TH ST
229 KENT AVE
135 JACKSON ST
208 tXJPOHT ST
465 LOGAN ST
214 40TH Sr
320-40 REMSEN AVE
1345 HALSEY ST
300 LIBERTY AVE
761 E. 42ND ST
EDISON
NEWARK
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
2IP UTH
CODE NORTHING
08637
07104
11222
11232
11211
11211
11222
11208
11232
11236
11237
11207
11210
4485.6
4511.9
4508.5
4501.1
4507.5
4507.4
4509.6
4512.9
4512.9
4512.9
4506.0
4502.8
4498.5
FAC1LITYF UKTAP
UIDE ENGINEERING EMISSIONS
UTH EMISSIONS APEDS* SCIENCE INVENTORY
EASUNC CTPY) (TPY) (TPY) SOURCE8 (TPY)
556.4
570.4
588.3
585.4
587.4
589.4
588.5
587.2
587.2
587.2
592.4
593.0
590.0
0.92
1.10
16.11
24.44
0.75
0.65
15.00
0.58
0.25
0.22
17.84
15.98
0.13
A
A
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
1
0.92
1.10
16.11
24.44
0.75
0.65
15.00
0.58
0.25
0.22
17.84
15.98
0.13
1,113.01
* APEDS 02/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
f FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data fron T«l CSARA 313), the NYSOEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
8 SOURCE LEGEND: A = APEOS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTU Inventory; S = SHS; T = TRI.
-------
Table 111-5-16; m-Xylene point source inventory
ZIP
UTM
FACILITY1"
WIDE ENGINEERING
UTH EMISSIONS APEDS SCIENCE
FACILITY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
CITY
CODE NORTHING EASTING (TPY)
ARGUS DIVISION
GOODY PRODUCTS INC.
633 COURT STREET
969 NEWARK TURNPIKE
BROOKLYN
KEARNY
11231
07032
4502.7
4514.2
584.4
572.4
0.25
12.61
(TRY) SOURCE0
UATAP
EMISSIONS
INVENTORY
(TRY)
12.86
Table III-5-17; o-Xylene point source inventory
f
H-I
o
FACILITY
WIDE
FACILITY NAME
SAMUEL BINGHAM COMPANY
INTERNATIONAL PAINT
HATCO CORP
BASF CORP
PERK CHEMICAL CO.. INC.
SOLVENTS RECOVERY SERVICE
MARISOL INC.
STREET ADDRESS
100 SOGMYI COURT
2270 MORRIS AVENUE
KING GEORGE POST ROAD
50 CENTRAL AVENUE
125 FACTORY LANE
CITY
SOUTH PLA1NFIELD
UNION
FORDS
KEARNY
ELIZABETH
LINDEN
MIDDLESEX
ZIP UTH
CODE NORTHING
07080
07083
08863
07032
07207
07036
08846
4490.7
4505.1
4485.6
4507.3
4499.8
4496.0
4489.9
UTN EMISSIONS
EASTING (TPY)
550.5
560.5
557.8
574.6
568.5
563.2
540.9
0.13
0.50
0.18
0.59
0.88
NGINEERIN
SCIENCE
(TPY)
0.05
0.37
0.49
G
SOURCE8
A
E
E
E
T
T
T
T
UATAP
EMISSIONS
INVENTORY
(TPY)
0.13
0.50
0.18
0.59
0.05
0.37
0.49
2.31
Table 111-5-18; Q-Xylene point source inventory
FACILITY NAME
STREET ADDRESS
CITY
KENCO WIRE & IRON PRODUCTS INC
39 EVERGREEN STREET
HAZLET
FACILITY1"
WIDE
ZIP UTH UTM EMISSIONS APEOS1
CODE NORTHING EASTING (TPY) (TPY)
07735 4476.3 568.3
0.00
ENGINEERING
SCIENCE
(TPY)
0.62
SOURCE
S
UATAP
EMISSIONS
INVENTORY
(TPY)
0.00
* APEDS 01/25/90 - permit allowable annual emissions rate (rounded to one-hundredths of a ton).
F FACILITY WIDE EMISSIONS means data from TRI (SARA 313), the NYSOEC Source Management System (SMS), or the EPA Region II POTU Inventory.
3 SOURCE LEGEMO: A = APEOS; E = Engineering Science Inventory; P = EPA Region II POTU Inventory; S = SMS; T = TRI.
-------
Table 1H-5-19: Area and mobile source air toxics emissions sumnary for Middlesex and Union Counties, Hew Jersey, and Staten Island, New York.
(Estimated
T
i
Architectural
Coating
Area Oil Heating
Area Wood Heating
Auto Ref inishing
Cold Degrees ing
Consumer Solvent
Use
Dry Cleaning
Gasoline
Distribution
Area Sources
total
Benzene
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
22.08
0.00
0.00
57.67
79.75
Air Emissions in Tons per Year)
Carbon
Cadmium Tetrachloride
0.00 0.00
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Chloroform
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Dichloro-
me thane
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
72.77
0.00
0.00
0.00
72.77
Formaldehyde
0.00
0.37
37. 902
0.00
0.00
27.11
0.00
0.00
65.38
n-Hexane
HE1
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
NE
Perchloro-
ethvleo*
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
41.25
0.00
748.28
0.00
789.52
Toluene
170.34
0.00
0.00
43.65
44.25
0.00
0.00
233.79
492.03
1,1,1-
Trichloro-
ethane
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
260.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
260.14
Trichloro-
ethylene
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
79.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
79.14
Xylene
fall isomers)
85.40
0.00
0.00
54.12
38.43
0.00
0.00
325.70
503.65
Mobile Sources
1281.89
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
412.58
317.553
0.00 1,757.48
0.00
0.00
1,961.87
1 "HE" means not evaluated for these source categories in this study.
2 Evaluated for Middlesex and Union Counties, NJ, only.
1 Derived from EPA Region II mobile source inventory. (See Emission Inventory Appendix E.)
-------
Emissions Inventory Appendices A through E provide details
of the generation of the inventories for point sources treated as
area sources and for area sources as follows:
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Appendix E
POTWs
Landfills
Hazardous wastes TSDF
Architectural coating, area (residential) oil
heating, auto refinishing, consumer solvent
use, cold degreasing, dry cleaning (coin
operated and commercial), and gasoline
distribution (retail)
Mobile sources
A-109
-------
Emissions Inventory Appendices A through E provide details
of the generation of the inventories for point sources treated as
area sources and for area sources as follows:
Appendix A POTWs
Appendix B Landfills
Appendix C Hazardous waste TSDFs
Appendix D Architectural coating, area (residential) oil
heating, auto refinishing, consumer solvent
use, cold degreasing, dry cleaning (coin
operated and commercial), and gasoline
distribution (retail)
Appendix E Mobile sources
A-110
-------
Emissions Inventory Appendix A
Emissions from New Jersey's
Publicly Owned Treatment Works
Evaluated in the Area Source Emission System
and
Emissions from New Jersey's and New York's
Publicly Owned Treatment Works
Evaluated in the EPA Region II POTW Inventory
A-lll
-------
Estimation of Air Toxics Emissions from Publicly Owned Treatment
Works - Derivation and Application of Emissions Factors
1. EPA Region II POTVf Inventory
This became the POTW inventory for the project. Development
of this inventory was based upon the work of Baamonde and
Martinovich (1987). The requirements for estimating the air
toxics emissions were speciated influent data to each POTW, daily
flow rates, removal efficiencies by pollutant, and tables from
the Report to Congress on the Discharge of Hazardous Wastes to
Publicly Owned Treatment Works (U.S. EPA, 1986) which presented
the expected rates of volatilization by pollutant. The results
are presented in Table III-5-A-1. The POTW Profile emission
factors in units of percent of total VOCs emitted were derived by
summing the emissions of a particular pollutant from each of the
11 POTWs, and dividing the total by the total VOC emissions from
all 11 POTWs. See Table III-5-A-2.
2. New Jersey's Area Source Emission System
Air toxics emissions from POTWs in Middlesex and Union
Counties were estimated by generating the total VOC emissions
using the Surface Impoundment Modeling System (SIMS). The model
requires the facility SIC code and daily flow input. (For the
purposes of this study, all POTW's were classified as SIC code
4953.) The model uses Henry's Law to predict the volatilization
of the flow from the surface impoundment. Following the
determination of total VOC emissions, a generic emission factor
for the air toxics of concern was derived in units of pounds of
air toxic substance per one million gallons of waste water
processed. The emission factor was applied to the estimated
average daily flow. See Table III-5-A-4 for the ASES emission
factors. The results of the ASES estimates are presented in
Table III-5-A-3.
3- Comparison of ASES and EPA Region n-derived Emission Factors
Table III-5-A-4 presents for comparison the New Jersey ASES
emission factors, the EPA Region II POTW Profile-derived emission
factors, and the range of facility-specific emission factors
derived for all the POTWs in EPA Region II inventory, in units of
pounds of substance per million gallons of waste water processed.
A-112
-------
Table IH-5-A-1;
Staten Island/New Jersey Urban Air Toxics Assessment Project POTWS (SIC Code 4953}
for Middlesex and Union Counties, Hi, and for Brooklyn and Staten Island
(Developed by EPA Region II)
FACILITY NAME
BOROUGH OF CARTERET DPU
CITY OF BAYONNE
CITY OF ELIZABETH
CITY OF HOBOKEH
CITY Of LINDEN
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK
CITY OF ORANGE DPU
CITY OF PERTH AHBOY
JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX & UNION
LINDEN ROSELLE S.A.
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
MIDDLESEX COUNTY SA
OLD BRIDGE TOWNSHIP S.A.
RAHUAY VALLEY S.A.
SOMERSET RARITAN VALLEY
SOUTH BRUNSWICK
TOWN OF KEARNY
t> TOWNSHIP OF LIVINGSTON
,1 TOWNSHIP OF WOOOBRIDGE
£ TOWNSHIP OF WOOOBRIDGE
26TH WARD
CONEY ISLAND
NEWTOUN CREEK
OAKWOOO BEACH
OWLS HEAD
PORT RICHMOND
RED HOOK
Totals
UTM-E2
566.66
574.81
568.31
583.04
563.37
543.78
563.33
561.08
567.86
567.14
550.84
563.29
564.87
566.88
536.64
532.19
574.85
555.57
563.50
558.88
595.17
590.42
587.33
574.09
581.61
573.83
586.26
UTM-N2
4491.58
4499.74
4503.13
4511.45
4505.28
4482.94
4510.83
4483.06
4498.44
4494.98
4482.98
4480.95
4478.59
4492.76
4489.00
4468.69
4507.23
4517.70
4489.24
4484.58
4500.13
4490.60
4509.04
4488.72
4498.67
4499.05
4506.40
FLOW
(HOD)3'* _
3.10
13.30
20.00
7.30
9.70
15.20
6.40
5.05
72.00
12.40
125.00
86.40
3.73
36.00
14.20
1.57
5.30
3.50
3.20
1.30
5.79
33.93
121.27
1.11
301.83
7.12
4.46
VOCs
(TPY)
4.12
18.11
27.29
23.59
13.10
20.72
8.61
6.77
98.52
16.88
171.12
118.24
4.97
49.21
19.35
2.04
7.11
4.66
4.26
1.67
56.00
99.00
321.00
34.00
114.00
39.00
41.00
Benzene
0.03
0.14
0.21
0.18
0.10
0.16
0.06
0.05
0.00
5.13
2.13
0.89
0.04
0.28
0.11
0.02
0.05
0.03
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.31
9.95
Carbon
Tetrachloride
0.01
0.04
0.06
0.05
0.03
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.00
0.00
1.23
0.27
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
3.01
Chloroform
0.02
0.11
0.16
0.14
0.08
0.12
0.05
0.04
1.50
0.06
0.63
0.69
0.03
0.05
0.27
0.01
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
0.00
0.00
2.72
0.22
0.09
0.39
0.24
7.72
Dichloro-
methane
0.95
4.18
6.31
5.45
3.03
4.79
1.99
1.56
38.96
6.17
8.21
27.32
1.15
0.87
1.39
0.47
1.64
1.08
0.98
0.39
3.42
26.72
68.88
0.37
77.92
2.28
9.47
305.94
Perch loro-
ethylene
0.20
0.89
1.34
1.16
0.64
1.02
0.42
0.33
0.00
0.00
23.11
5.81
0.24
8.10
0.07
0.10
0.35
0.23
0.21
0.08
1.23
5.92
7.70
0.21
0.44
3.29
2.02
65.13
Toluene
0.36
1.59
2.40
2.08
1.15
1.82
0.76
0.60
15.77
5.37
46.02
10.41
0.44
13.66
0.37
0.18
0.63
0.41
0.37
0.15
0.00
0.24
7.81
0.22
0.13
0.00
3.21
116.54
1,1,1-Tri-
chloroethane
0.43
1.89
2.85
2.46
1.37
2.16
0.90
0.71
0.00
0.06
61.13
12.35
0.52
0.93
0.17
0.21
0.74
0.49
0.44
0.17
0.42
0.00
7.26
0.00
35.29
1.03
4.28
138.27
Trichlor-
ethvlene
0.11
0.51
0.76
0.66
0.37
0.58
0.24
0.19
10.67
0.00
5.45
3.30
0.14
2.54
0.15
0.06
0.20
0.13
0.12
0.05
0.72
1.05
7.55
0.00
0.13
0.13
1.14
36.92
1 For facilities not addressed in Baamonde and Martinovich (1986), the POTW Profile percentages appearing in Table III-5-A-2 were used to speciate total
VOCs.
2 The UTM coordinates of each POTU were derived from latitude and longitude coordinates.
2 >>MGD" means million gallons per day.
4 Average flow, in MGD, based upon facility-specific data reported in 1987. Baamonde et al., for New York POTWs, and reported in 1990 for Mew Jersey POTUs.
-------
Table HI-5-A-2; POTUs used to develop an average POIU Profile of air toxics emissions
facility name
Flow rate
(NGO)*
JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX & UNION 72.00
LINDEN ROSELLE S.A.
MIDDLESEX COUNT T
RAHUAY VALLEY S.A.
SOMERSET RARITAN VALLEY
26TH WARD
CONEY ISLAND
NEUTOUN CREEK
OAKUOOO BEACH
OWLS HEAD
PORT RICHMOND
Value used as average POTU
Maximum value
Minimum Value
Average of percentages***
12.40
125.00
36.00
14.20
5.79
33.93
121.27
1.11
301.83
7.12
Profile**
VOCs
tTPY)
98.52
16. BS
171.12
49.21
19.35
56.00
99.00
321.00
34.00
114.00
39.00
UTH-K
4498.44
4494.93
4462.98
4492.76
4489.00
4500.13
4490.60
4509.04
4468.72
4498.67
4499.05
UTM-E
567.86
567. U
550.84
566.88
536.64
595.17
590.42
587.33
574.09
581.61
573.83
Ben to
O.OOX
30.3BX
1.24X
0.5TX
0.57X
O.OOX
O.OOX
O.OOX
O.OOX
O.OOX
O.OOX
0.75X
30.38X
O.OOX
2.98X
Carbon
tetra-
chloride
O.OOX
O.OOX
0.7ZX
O.OOX
O.OOX
O.OOX
O.OOX
0.34X
O.OOX
O.OOX
O.OOX
0.23X
0.72X
O.OOX
0.10X
Chloro-
form
1.52X
Q.34X
0.37X
0.101
1.40%
O.OOX
O.OOX
0.85X
0.65X
0.08X
1.00X
o.sex
1.52X
O.OOX
0.57X
Oichloro-
me thane
39.54X
34.53X
4. 80%
1.77X
7.18X
6.11X
26.99X
21 .46X
1.09X
68.35X
5.85X
23.10X
68.35X
1.09X
19.97X
Perch loro-
ethjdene
O.OOX
O.OOX
13. sax
16.46X
0.36X
2.20X
5.98X
2.40X
0.62X
0.38X
8.44X
4.92X
16.46X
O.OOX
4.58X
Toluene
16.01X
31.79X
26.89*
27.76X
1.91X
O.OOX
0.24X
2.43X
0.65X
0.12X
O.OOX
8. SOX
31.79X
O.OOX
9. SOX
1,1,1-Ti
chloro-
ethane
O.OOX
0.35X
35.72X
1.S9X
0.88X
0.75X
O.OOX
2.26X
O.OOX
30.96X
2.64X
10.44X
35.72X
O.OOX
6.86X
Tri-
chloro-
ethylene
10.83X
O.OOX
3.18X
5.16X
0.78X
1.29X
1.06X
2.35X
O.OOX
0.11X
0.33X
2.79X
10.83X
O.OOX
2.28%
* Hi(Iion gallons per day
** The POTW Profile percentages were calculated by sunning the emissions of a particular pollutant from
each of the 11 POTUs and dividing by the total VOC emissions from all 11 POTUs.
*** The Average of the Percentages is the average of the individual percentages of a particular pollutant
from each of the 11 POTUs.
-------
I
H-*
Ui
in Middlesex and Union Counties,
PERMIT
HUMBER FACILITY NAME
NJ0020141 MIDDLESEX COUNTY SEWERAGE AUTH.
NJ0020397 WOODBRIDGE, TOWNSHIP OF
NJ0020401 WOODBRIDGE. TOWNSHIP OF
NJ0020541 SOUTH AMBOY S.T.P.
NJ0021636 NEW PROVIDENCE WTP, BOROUGH OF
NJ0022306 OLDBRIDGE BOARD OF EDUCATION
HJ0022471 OLDBRIDGE TWP S.A.
NJ0023213 PERTH AMBOY, CITY OF
NJ0023825 SAYREVILLE, BOROUGH OF
NJ0023833 SAYREVILLE, BOROUGH OF
NJ0024104 THE LINPRO COMPANY
NJ0024571 CARTERET D.P.W., BOROUGH OF
NJ0024643 RAHWAY VALLEY SEWERAGE AUTH.
HJ0024741 JOINT MTG-ESSEX and UN I OH OJVYS
NJ0024953 LINDEN ROSELLE S.A.
NJ0027961 WATER POLLUTION CONTROL
NJ 00284 79 JAHESBUflG SCHOOL FOR BOYS
NJ0028835 MIDDLESEX COUNTY
NJ0033065 OLD BRIDGE HUA BROWNTOUN
UTM-E
551.0
563.0
558.9
560.0
550.0
558.6
563.9
561.1
563.2
560.0
533.2
566.1
567.0
567.8
565.0
546.6
552.0
547.0
558.8
New Jersey
irm-u
4480.0
4489.8
4484.5
4481.0
4507.0
4475.9
4478.9
4483.4
4479.3
4480.5
4464.0
4492.1
4493.1
4499.4
4496.0
4503.4
4465.0
4482.1
4472.1
AVG.
FLOW
ESTIMATED AIR TOXICS
Carbon
YEAR Benzene Tetrachloride Chloroform
OF
179.20'
103.75
IMGD?a
487.21
28.94
7.03
5.79
5.91
0.04
5.32
27.17
1.34
0.60
3.90
16.66
160.43
395.42
63.15
10.57
0.77
0.36
2.01
Trichlor-
ethylene
458.66
(ug/l)
57.65
3.43
0.83
0.69
0.70
0.00
0.63
3.22
0.16
0.07
0.46
1.97
18.98
46.79
7.47
1.25
0.09
0.04
0.24
SAMPLE CALCULATION: Middlesex County Sewerage Authority (benzene)
Emissions
-------
Table III-5-A-4; Emission Factors used in the ASES inventory and
derived from the EPA Region II Inventory of
POTWs
EMISSION FACTORS,
Ibs/million gallons of vastewater
processed
Benzene
Carbon tetrachloride
Chloroform
Dichloromethane
Perchloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
ASES
1.500
0.866
0.443
3.980
16.300
32.400
NA2
3.830
EPA1
0.183
0.027
0.109
2.203
0.649
0.937
0.910
0.279
EPA Ranae
0.042 -
0.017 -
0.002 -
0.132 -
0.008 -
0.002 -
0.026 -
0.000 -
2.267
0.115
1.086
11.647
2.532
4.437
5.264
1.406
1 The average emission factor for each pollutant was derived by
averaging the facility-specific derived emission factors; i.e.,
1-27
E (n, tons chanical/yr x 2000#/ton x 1 yr/365 days)/miUion gallons per day
1-1
number of facilities
2 "NAM means not available.
A-116
-------
Emissions Inventory Appendix B
Emissions from Landfills
A-117
-------
Estimation of Air Toxics Emissions from Landfills
1. Landfill Depth
Specific information on landfill acreage and depth generally
fell into one of three categories:
(1) both parameters known;
(2) acreage known, depth estimated; or
(3) size unknown, parameters averaged.
The regression line found in Figure III-5-B-1 was developed
from the data for facilities in group 1. For group 2, the
landfill depth was calculated from the regression line and the
known landfill acres, using the equation for a line and solving
for depth (the Y variable) as follows:
Y - mX + b (eq. III-5-B-1)
where:Y - landfill depth (feet)
m = slope of the line, which is AX/AY
(dimensionless)
X = landfill size (acres)
b = Y-intercept
For group 3 facilities (size unknown), the parameters were
estimated. The mean of the known acreages (groups 1 and 2) was
assigned as the estimated acreage, and the estimated depth was
calculated from equation III-5-B-1, above.
From Figure III-5-B-1:
m = (130 - 60)/(200 - 70) = 0.5385
b = 22.5
Y = 0.5385(X) + 22.5
or Depth = 0.5385(Acres) +22.5
Having established values for acreage and depth, the volume of
the landfill was determined:
Volume * Acres x Depth
A-118
-------
2. Annual VOC Emissions
Estimating the volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions
(in pounds per year) was the next step in the process. The
following equation presents the VOC estimating calculation:
VOC (Ibs/yr) - (Depth,ft) x (1 yd/ft) x (Surface area,acres) x (4840 yd2/ac) x
(3100 lb/yr/106 yd3)
The emission factor of 3,100 pounds of VOC per year per
million cubic yards was obtained from Vogt and Conrad (1987).
3. Air Toxics Specific Estimations
Two air toxics emission factors were obtained from EPA
(U.S.EPA, 1985; U.S. EPA, 1987) as follows:
Tetrachloroethylene 9.3 Ibs/year/million cubic yards
Toluene 3.1 Ibs/year/million cubic yards
The annual emission rate for each substance from each
landfill was then calculated. When the annual emission rate was
estimated at one one-hundredth (0.01) of a ton, or more, the
facility information and emissions data were entered into the
inventory.
Sample calculations are provided on the next page for
(1) estimation of landfill depth;
(2) estimation of annual VOC emissions;
(3) estimation of annual tetrachloroethylene emissions; and,
(4) estimation of annual toluene emissions.
A-119
-------
Sane Ie Calculations of Air Toxics Emissions from Landfills
Example 1: 1216C Asarco Inc. Sanitary Landfill
Acres =75.8
a. Landfill Depth
Depth • 0.5385yd3>
* (63.3/3) (75.8) (4840) (3100) + 1,000,000
« 23,997 Ib/yr VOC
* 12 tons/yr VOC
c. Air Toxics Specific Estimations
i. Tetrachloroethylene
emission factor of 9.30 lb/10* yd3
• [(Depth+3ft/yd) (Acres) (4840yd2/acre) (9.3 lb/yr/10'yd3)
» (63.3/3) (75.8) (4840) (9.3) + 1,000.000
* 72 Ib/yr * 0.04 ton/vr
ii. Toluene
emission factor of 3.10 lb/10* yd3
« C(0epth+3ft/yd) (Acres) (4840yd*/acre) (3.1 lb/yr/10'yd3)
« (63.3/3) (75.8) (4840) (3.1) + 1,000,000
« 24 Ib/yr « 0.01 ton/vr
Example 2: Fresh Kills Landfill, Staten Island, NY
size « 1,400 acres, 300 acres of which is served by
a methane recovery plant*
volume - 84 MMyd3 (84 x 10f yd3)
(estimate for 1988*)
i. Tet rachIoroethyIene
emission factor of 9.30 lb/yr/10' yd3
« 84 MH yd3 x (1400 acres - 300 acres)/1400 acres x 9.3 lb/yr/10* yd3
» 84 x 0.7857 x 9.3 Ib/yr
« 613.8 Ib/yr « 0.31 ton/vr
ii. Toluene
emission factor of 3.10 lb/yr/10* yd3
» 84 MM yd3 x 3.1 lb/yr/10* yd3
« 84 x 3.1 Ib/yr
» 260.4 Ib/yr « 0.13 ton/yr
* Gleason, 1992.
A-120
-------
Table II1-5-B-1; LANDFILL FACILITIES
IP » Facility Name
Complete Data Sets
Acreage known - depth estimated
1201A Middlesex Landfill Corp.
1201B Carteret Boro SLF
1202A Cranbury Township SLF
1213B Olbry's SLF
1213C Jamesburg Boro SLF
1213F Bradford SLF
1216A Celotex Corp. SLF
1216B Perth Anfcoy City SLF
1216C Asarco Inc. SLF
1216E Bird & Son SLF
12170 Colluci Trucking SLF
1216A Plainsboro Twp. SLF
1222A South Plainfield Boro
1225B Elizabeth Disposal Inc.
2001A Union County SLF
2009A Linden City SLF
2013A Rahuay City SLF
SIC Code 4953 (in Middlesex and Union Counties. Hew Jersey).
TETRACHLOROETHtLEME
Est.
Area Depth Depth UTM
(Ac) (Ft)
UTM
Volume
TOLUENE
Emission Ibs. per
Factor
TPYJ
1204A
1205 A
1205C
12050
12056
1209A
1211A
1213A
12130
1225E
Edgeboro Disposal SLF4
Edison Tup. SLF
I.L.R. SLF
Kin-Buc Inc. #1
Kin-Buc Inc. #2
Global Corp. SLF
Middlesex Boro SLF
Etsch SLF
BFI of South Jersey SLF
Uoodbridge Sanitary
Fresh Kills Landfill
233
35
120
60
20
51
3
5
86
4.6
1400
130
60
100
90
20
70
8
10
60
10
-
148
41
87
55
33
50
24
25
69
25
12
553.0
554.0
556.5
554.5
554.5
561.0
543.0
552.5
552.5
559.0
570.0
4480.0
4482.0
4482.0
4482.5
4482.5
4479.0
4490.5
4463.5
4465.5
4490.0
4498.0
48.87
3.39
19.36
8.71
0.65
5.76
0.04
0.08
8.32
0.07
84
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
444.70
30.83
176.18
79.28
5.87
52.41
0.35
0.73
75.76
0.68
613.8
0.22
0.02
0.09
0.04
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.31
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
151.49
10.50
60.02
27.01
2.00
17.85
0.12
0.25
25.81
0.23
260.4
0.08
0.01
0.03
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.13
15
30
10.8
7
4.2
6.2
14
10
75.8
15
10
5
50
1.5
4
45
2.5
31
39
28
26
25
26
30
28
63
31
28
25
49
23
25
47
24
566.5
566.5
542.0
552.5
548.0
4494.0
4494.0
4464.0
4465.5
4467.0
not located
560.5
560.5
562.5
561.5
545.0
535.0
550.5
558.5
549.5
564.0
562.5
4484.5
4485.0
4485.5
4487.0
4490.5
4463.5
4490.5
4485.0
4501.5
4494.5
4494.5
0.74
1.88
0.50
0.30
0.17
0.26
0.68
0.45
7.74
0.74
0.45
0.20
3.99
0.06
0.16
3.40
0.10
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
9.30
6.77
17.07
4.51
2.72
1.54
2.37
6.20
4.12
70.48
6.77
4.12
1.86
36.33
0.52
1.46
30.93
0.88
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
2.30
5.82
1.54
0.93
0.52
0.81
2.11
1.40
24.01
2.30
1.40
0.63
12.38
0.1B
0.50
10.54
0.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
1 Landfill volume is in units of "millions of cubic yards" (HHyds3).
2 Emission factors are in units of "pounds per year per million cubic yards" (lbs/yr/MMyds3).
3 "TPY" means tons per year.
4 "SLF" means sanitary landfill.
-------
Table 111-5-8-1. continued; LANDFILL FACILITIES - SIC Code 4953 (in Middlesex and Union Counties, New Jersey).
Est. Est.
Area Depth Depth
ID * Facility Name
Size unknown (area t depth based on averages)
T
t— >
10
1205U
1213E
1216U
12186
1219A
1219S
12190
1220U
1221B
1221U
20090
Lotano Landfill
Knights of Columbus Landfill
National Lead Landfill
Plainsboro Twp. SLF4 Expansion
Du Pont-Uashington Rd SLF
Sayreville Boro SLF
NL Industries Inc SLF
South Anboy City Landfill
South Brunswick Twp SLF
Cities Service landfill
American Cyanamid SLF-Haz
34.2
34.2
34.2
34.2
34.2
34.2
34.2
34.2
34.2
34.2
34.2
:pth
Lfll
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
41
UTM
(E)
553.5
548.0
562.5
535.0
557.0
554.0
559.0
559.5
538.5
537.0
465.5
UTH
(")
4494.5
4468.0
4486.0
4463.5
4480.0
4477.0
4483.0
4483.0
4469.0
4469.5
4496.0
Volume1
(MHyds3)
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
2.26
TETRACHLOROETtiYLEHE
TOLUENE
Emission Ibs. per
9.30 20.60
9.30 20.60
9.30 20.60
9.30 20.60
9.30 20.60
9.30 20.60
9.30 20.60
9.30 20.60
9.30 20.60
9.30 20.60
9.30 20.60
TOTAL ANNUAL EMISSIONS OF SUBSTANCE (TPY)
TPYJ
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.96
Emission Ibs. per
factor
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
3.10
7.02
7.02
7.02
7.02
7.02
7.02
7.02
7.02
7.02
7.02
7.02
TPrJ
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.35
1 Landfill volume is in units of "millions of cubic yards" (HMyds3).
2 Emission factors are in units of "pounds per year per million cubic yards" (lbs/yr/HMyds3).
3 "TPY" Beans tons per year.
4 "SLF" means sanitary landfill.
-------
J
N3
U
JC
•*•
a
Q
Figure III-5-B-1.
150
140 -
130 -
120 -
11O -
100 -
90 -
80 -
70 -
60 -
50 -
40 -
30 -
20 -
10 -
0
d?
Landfill Size and Depth
including regression line
a
T 1 T
40
T
T
80
120
Size in Acres
160
200
240
-------
Emissions Inventory Appendix C
Emissions from Hazardous Waste
Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities
A-124
-------
Table III-5-C-1; Hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities1 - SIC Code 7389
(in Middlesex and Union Counties, New Jersey).
FACILITY
NUMBER
FACILITY NAME
CITY
1211B HARISOL INC MIDDLESEX
2004C PERK CHEMICAL CO., INC ELIZABETH
2009C SOLVENTS RECOVERY SERVICE OF NJ LINDEN
K UTM
1986
Pounds of
VOC
Y UTM Emissions
540.9 4489.9 5,312,000
568.5 4499.8 4,026,000
563.2 4496.0 549,000
0.47
Emissions (tons per year)2
Benzene
0.25
0.19
0.03
Ti
Toluene <
0.74
0.56
0.08
-ichloro- Tetrachloro-
»thylene ethylene
0.13
0.10
0.01
0.25
0.19
0.03
Xylenes
0.49
0.37
0.05
1.38
0.24
0.47
0.91
> EMISSION FACTORS3
10
in
(pound of substance per pound of VOC emissions):
9.30E-05 2.79E-04
4.80E-05
9.30E-05 1.86E-04
1 Includes only those facilities uhich were clearly engaged in the processing and treatment of hazardous wastes.
2 Air toxics emissions based on 1986 volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions data.
3 Emission factors were derived from EPA documentation (U.S. EPA, 1985; U.S. EPA, 1987).
-------
Emissions Inventory Appendix D
Emissions from Area Sources
using Population Based Emissions Factors
• architectural coating
• area (residential) oil heating
• auto refinishing
• consumer solvent use
• cold degreasing
• dry cleaning (SIC 7215 - coin operated)
(SIC 7216 - commercial)
• gasoline distribution, retail (SIC 5541)
A-126
-------
Estimation of Air Toxics Emissions from Area Sources using
Population- Based Emission Factors
Air toxics emissions estimates were developed for area
source categories following EPA-prescribed methods. The
following categories were evaluated:
• architectural coating
• area (residential) oil heating
auto refinishing
cold degreasing
consumer solvent use
dry cleaning
gasoline distribution, retail
The procedure applied simple population based models which
estimated usage and emissions of volatile organic compounds
(VOCs) on a per capita basis. Speciation factors from previously
published data (U.S. EPA, 1980a) were used to generate factors
for the relevant pollutants.
To start the process of organizing the data, a grid cell
procedure was designed for the study area using square cells of
two kilometers (2km) per side. Grid cells were superimposed upon
the geographic region based upon boundaries defined as fifths of
Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) 10,000 meter grids. Figure
III-5-2 of this report displays the grid cell network.
Assignment of cell population was rigorously determined
using tract level information and 1986 census updates (NJDOL,
1987; USDOC, 1986). Population by census tract was allocated to
individual cells, based upon U.S. Bureau of the Census maps and
the defined grid network. The last step was a simple calculation
using cell population and the per capita emission factor to
generate the estimated emissions for the individual pollutants.
A-127
-------
The population figures were also applied to the development
of the mobile source air toxics estimates. Following are the
population figures applied to the source categories addressed in
this appendix and Appendix E (mobile sources).
Population Estimates used in generating
Area and Mobile Sources Emissions
County ASES EPA Mobile*
Middlesex, NJ 558,5601'2 574,5201'3
Union, NJ 493,040* 499,9303
Richmond, NY 374,000* 380,9703
(Staten Island)
* The EPA Region II mobile source inventory covered portions of
Essex, Hudson, and Monmouth Counties, and all of Brooklyn, in
addition to the counties listed here.
1 Figures for the municipalities included in the study area
(approximately 88% of the total county population).
2 NJDOL, 1987.
3 USDOC, 1988.
* USDOC, 1987.
A-128
-------
The population-based emissions factors (in pounds per person
per year) that were applied to area source category air toxics
emissions estimates follow.
Area (Residential) Oil Heating
Cadmium 5.86E-04
Formaldehyde 5.21E-04
Architectural Coating
Toluene 2.39E-01 1.39E+001
Xylene 1.20E-01 5.40E-011
Auto Refinishing
Toluene 6.10E-02
Xylene 7.60E-02
Cold Degreasing
Benzene 3.10E-02
Dichloromethane 1.02E-01
Perchloroethylene 5.80E-02
Toluene 6.20E-02
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 3.65E-01
Trichloroethylene 1.11E-01
Xylene 5.40E-02
Consumer Solvent Use
Formaldehyde 3.80E-02
Dry Cleaning
Perchloroethylene 1.05E-00
Gasoline Distribution, retail
Benzene 8.10E-02 6.54E-022
Toluene 3.28E-01 2.21E-012
Xylene 4.57E-01 3.49E-012
1 Population-based emission factors developed by NYSDEC for
architectural coating.
2 Population-based emission factors derived from New York State
population data and substance-specific emissions, in pounds per
day, for retail gas distribution.
A-129
-------
Emissions Inventory Appendix E
Estimation of Air Toxics Emissions
from Mobile Sources
A-130
-------
Table III-5-E-1: Mobile source emissions estimates by New Jersey, Meu York, and EPA Region II; and the resulting SI/HJ IMTAP mobile source inventory
EMISSIONS (in tons per year - TRY)
COUNTY
MEW JERSEY PEP1
MIDDLESEX
UNION
X OF
COUHTY
88.1
100.0
BENZENE
502.09
443.45
FORMALDEHYDE
161.64
142.72
n-HEXANE
NA
NA
668.40
607.92
o-XYLEME
NA
NA
NA
HA
XYLENES
nixed
isoroers
768.38
678.66
XYLENES
all isomers
768.38
678.66
NEU YORK STATE DEC*
STATEN ISLAND 100.0
532.35
123.00
NA
812.86
NA
1151.21
1151.21
EPA REGION II3
ESSEX
HUDSON
MIDDLESEX
HONMOUTH
UNION
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
TOTALS:
72.9
77.8
88.1
30.4
100.0
100.0
100.0
128.38
79.47
195.90
16.64
134.32
201.85
150.75
907.31
71.19
42.29
104.22
24.81
71.54
107.31
80.30
501.66
83.72
49.95
122.56
29.14
83.95
126.29
94.54
590.15
495.14
294.33
724.73
172.37
496.04
746.43
557.72
3486.76
150.11
89.41
220.03
52.29
150.75
226.67
169.36
246.64
146.45
360.92
85.86
247.11
371.94
277.77
HA
HA
HA
HA
HA
HA
NA
1058.62 1736.69
396.75
235.86
580.95
138.15
397.86
598.61
447.13
2795.31
Sl/HJ UATAP inventory
STATEN ISLAND
MIDDLESEX
UNION
TOTALS:
100.0
68.1
100.0
336.35
502.09
443.45
1,281.89
108.22
161.64
142.72
412.58
NA
NA
NA
317.55
461.16
688.40
607.92
1757.48
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
su.es
768.38
678.66
1961.87
514.63
768.38
678.66
1 ASES mobile source inventory based upon the countywide VMT, MOBILES estimate of total HC, pollutant-specific emission factors in terms of gpm or
percent of total hydrocarbons, and apportionment by cell population on a uniform per capita basis (pounds per year per person) throughout Middlesex
and Union Counties.
2 NYSOEC emissions estimates based upon grid-level VMT data, MOBILE3 estimate of total HC, the emission factors used by NJDEP, and apportionment to
cells on the basis of VMT per cell.
3 EPA Region III emissions estimates based upon mobile source emissions data from New Jersey and New York to generate total VOCs; chemical speciatiort
based upon percent compositions from the VOC Profile Report for gasoline vehicle exhaust (U.S. EPA, 1990), and apportionment using 1990 population
data.
4 Calculated using per capita emission factors (pounds/year/person) derived from tIJDEP estimates for the Hew Jersey counties, uith the exception of
the value for n-hexane, which was generated by EPA Region II.
-------
Table 111-5-E-2; Air toxics emissions from motor vehicles-
Derived population-based emissions factors
Pollutant
AUTO
Benzene
- Evaporative
- Exhaust
Formaldehyde
Hexane
Toluene
- Evaporative
- Exhaust
Xylenes
- Evaporative
- Exhaust
Emission
factor
used by
NJ and NY3
1.79X7
0.131 gpm8
0.045 gpm9
0.091X7
7.4X7
0.008X7
10. 6X7
Derived per capita
Emission Emission Factor1'
factor used
bv EPA4 ASESS
1.39% 1.799
0.74% 0.579
0.87X N/A
5.14 X 2.466
4.12X 2.753
S1AIR5
2.846
0.660
N/A
4.347
6.156
EPA «
Region II8
0.365
0.202
0.237
1.402
1.124
1 The ASES per capita emission factor was used to generate the SI/NJ UATAP mobile source inventory. It was
based on the combined estimated emissions for Middlesex and Union Counties divided by the combined
population of the two counties. The SIAIR and EPA Region II per capita emission factors listed here
were not used in generating inventories; they were derived from the inventories submitted by NYSDEC and
EPA Region II.
2 Derived population-based emission factor in units of pounds per year per person.
3 Emission factors in units of percent of total hydrocarbons (output of MOBILES model), or
grams per mile (gpm).
4 The average percent composition of the chemical in VOCs in gasoline vehicle exhaust (U.S. EPA, 1990).
5 The ASES estimate covered all of Union County and 88X of Middlesex County. The SIAIR estimate covered
Staten Island. See Appendix D for population etimates used for Middlesex and Union
Counties, and for Staten Island.
8 The EPA Region II estimate covered the combined area covered by the ASES and SIAIR estimates, and portions
of Essex, Hudson, and Monmouth Counties, and all of Brooklyn, as well. The 1988 populations used for
these additional counties are as follows: 611,850 for 72.9X of Essex; 421,690 for 77.8X of Hudson;
169,610 for 30.4X of Monmouth; and 2,314.300 for 100X of Brooklyn (USDOC, 1988).
7 Carhart and Walsh, 1987.
8 U.S. EPA, 1985b.
9 Carey, 1987.
A-132
-------
Table III-5-E-3; EPA Region II mobile source emissions estimates
for five New Jersey counties and two boroughs
of New York City - VOC emissions in tons per
day (TPD)
NEW JERSEY
COUNTY
Total VOC Percent of county
in county/ or borough
borough. TPD in the study area
Total VOC for
study area*,
TPD
Essex
Hudson
Middlesex
Monmouth
Union
36.121
20.175
43.832
30.268
26.448
72.9
77.8
88.1
30.4
100.0
26.345
15.690
38.629
9.190
26.448
NEW YORK CITY
BOROUGH
Brooklyn
Staten Island
39.786
29.732
100.0
100.0
39.786
29.732
* NOTE: It was assumed that VOCs are uniform throughout
municipalities and that VOC emissions are in direct and
constant proportion with population.
A-133
-------
Table III-5-E-4; EPA Region II mobile source emissions for five New Jersey counties and
•r
two boroughs of New York City - Speciated VOC emissions for the entire
county in tons per day1
Total Soeciated VOC for entire county, TPD
COUNTY VOC. TPD2
Essex
Hudson
Middlesex
Monmouth
Union
Brooklyn
Staten Island
36.121
20.175
43.832
30.268
26.448
39.786
29.732
Benzene Formaldehyde
(1.393) (0.74)
0.502
0.280
0.609
0.421
0.368
0.553
0,413
0.267
0.149
0.324
0.224
0.196
0.294
0.220
n-Hexane
(0.87)
0.314
0.176
0.381
0.263
0.230
0.346
0.259
Toluene
(5.14)
1.857
1.037
2.253
1.556
1.359
2.045
1.528
o-Xylene
(1.56)
0.563
0.315
0.684
0.472
0.413
0.621
0.464
p-Xylene
(2.56)
0.925
0.516
1.122
0.775
0.677
1.019
0.761
1 NOTE: The emission estimates addressed only light-duty gasoline-fueled vehicles; they
do not include the small percentage of gasoline-fueled trucks or the non-gasoline-
fueled vehicles. Also not addressed was the variability of emissions with chemical
compositions of fuels.
2 This is the VOC total for the entire county from Table III-5-E-3.
3 The number in parentheses under the chemical name is the average percent composition of
the chemical in gasoline exhaust VOC emissions (U.S. EPA, 1990).
-------
Table III-5-E-5:
EPA Region II mobile source emissions for the covered municipalities of
Essex County- Chemical emissions in pounds per day and tons per year.
ESSEX COUNTY
Benzene Formaldehyde n-Hexane Toluene o-Xylene p-Xylene
T
Ui
% Population2
East Orange
Irvington
Livingston
Maplewood
Millburn
Newark
Orange
South Orange
West Orange
9.19
7.41
3.37
2.69
2.30
37.40
3.72
1.92
4.90
Portion of total
Essex population: 72.90%
0.502
TPD1
92.37
74.60
4.04
2,7.21
23.29
375.60
37.55
19.48
49.30
)A¥: 703.44
?Y: 128.38
0.267 0.314
TPD1 TPD1
Pounds oer
49.13
39.68
18.10
14.47
12.39
199.77
19.97
10.36
26.22
390.09
71.19
57.78
46.66
21.29
17.02
14.57
234.93
23.49
12.18
30.83
458.75
83.72
1.857 0.563 0.925
TPD1 TPD1 TPD1
Day3
341.69
275.95
125.90
100.65
86.16
1,389.41
138.90
72.05
182.36
2,713.07
495.14
103.59
83.66
38. 17
30.51
26.12
421.24
42.11
21.84
55.29
822.53
150.11
170.20
137.46
62.72
50.14
42.92
692.08
69.19
35.89
90.84
1351.44
246.64
1 Tons per day per substance for the entire county; quantities are from Table III-5-E-4.
2 Population data from USOOC, \9fift.
3 Pounds per day per municipality:
[County tons/day (substance) K 2000 pounds/ton x X Population per Municipality] / 100
e.g.: East Orange (benzene) [0.502 tons/day x. 3000 pounds/'ton x 9.19X] / tOOX = *2.37 LBS/DAY
-------
Table III-5-E-6;
EPA Region II mobile source emissions for the covered municipalities of
Hudson County - Chemical emissions in pounds per day and tons per year
HUDSON COUNTY
Benzene Formaldehyde n-Hexane Toluene o-Xvlene p-Xvlene
Bayonne
East Newark
Harrison
Hoboken
Jersey City
Kearny
Union
% Population2
11.24
0.32
2.20
7.72
40.14
6.25
9.89
Portion of total
Hudson population: 77.76% LBS/DAY: 435.44
0.280
TPD1
62.94
1.79
12.32
43.23
224.78
35.00
55.38
LY: 435.44
>Y: 79.47
0.149
TPD1
33.50
0.95
6.56
23.01
119.62
18.63
29.47
231.74
42.29
0.176
TPD1
Pounds per
39.56
1.13
7.74
27.17
141.29
22.00
34.81
273.70
49.95
1.037
TPD1
Dav3
233.12
6.64
45.63
160.11
832.50
129.63
205.12
1,612.75
294.33
0.315
TPD1
70.81
2.02
13.86
48.64
252.88
39.38
62.31
489.90
89.41
0.516
TPD1
116.00
3.30
22.70
79.67
414.24
64.50
102.06
802.47
146.45
4 Tons per day per substance for the entire county; quantities are from Table I1I-5-E-4.
2Population data from USOC. 1938.
3Pounds per day per municipality:
[County tons/day (substance) x 2000 pounds/ton K X Population per Municipality] / 100
e.g.: Bayonne (benzene) [0.280 tons/day x 2000 pounds/ton x 11.24%) / 100X = 62.94 IBS/DAY
-------
t—I
CO
Table III-5-E-7:
MIDDLESEX COUNTY
EPA Region II mobile source emissions for the covered municipalities of
Middlesex County - Chemical emissions in pounds per day and tons per
year
Benzene Formaldehyde n-Hexane Toluene o-Xylene p-Xvlene
% Population2
Carteret 2.95
Dunellen 0.95
East Brunswick 6.84
Edison 13.08
Highland Park 1.94
Metuchen 1,97
Middlesex 2.01
Milltown 1.06
New Brunswick 6.04
North Brunswick 4.09
Old Bridge 8.71
Perth Amboy 5.63
Piscataway 6.75
Sayreville 5.49
South Amboy 1.17
S. Plainfield 3.15
South River 2.03
Woodbridge 14.27
Portion of total
Middlesex
population: 88.13%
0.609
TPD1
•n2
35.93
11.57
83.31
159.31
23.63
23.99
24.48
12.91
73.57
49.82
106.09
68.57
82.22
66.87
14.25
38.37
24.73
173.81
LBS/DAY: 1,073.42
TPY: 195.90
0.324
TPD1
19.12
6.16
44.32
84.76
12.57
12.77
13.02
6.87
39.14
26.50
56.44
36.48
43.74
35.58
7.58
20.41
13.15
92.47
571.08
104.22
0.381
TPD1
Pounds
22.48
7.24
52.12
99.67
14.78
15.01
15.32
8.08
46.02
31.17
66.37
42.90
51.44
41.83
8.92
24.00
15.47
108.74
671.55
122.56
2.253
TPD1
per Dav
132.93
42.81
308.21
589.38
87.42
88.77
90.57
47.76
272.16
184.30
392.47
253.69
304.16
247.38
52.72
141.94
91.47
643.01
3,971.14
724.73
0.684
TPD1
40.36
13.00
93.57
178.93
26.54
26.95
27.50
14.50
82.63
55.95
119.15
77.02
92.34
75.10
16,01
43.09
27.77
195.21
1,205.62
220.03
1.122
TPD1
66.20
21.32
153.49
293.52
43.53
44.21
45.10
23.79
135.54
91.78
195.45
126.34
151.47
123.20
26.25
70.69
45.55
320.22
1,977.64
360.92
1 Tons per day per substance for the entire county; quantities are from Table I1I-5-E-4.
2 Population data from USDOC. 1988.
-------
Table III-5-E-8;
EPA Region II mobile source emissions for the covered municipalities of
Monmouth County - Chemical emissions in pounds per day and tons per
year
MONMOUTH COUNTY
% Population2
Aberdeen 3.38
Atlantic Highlands 0.89
Hazlet 4.10
Highlands 0.92
Holmdel 2.07
Keansburg 1.90
Keyport 1.33
> Matawan 1.53
£ Middletown 12.42
oa Monmouth Beach 0.66
Union Beach 1.15
Portion of total
Monmouth
population: 30.35% LB£
Benzene Formaldehyde n-Hexane Toluene o-Xvlene p-Xvlene
0.421
TPD1
28.
7.
34.
7.
17.
16.
11.
12.
104.
5.
9.
,Y: 255
'Y: 46
46
49
52
75
43
00
20
88
58
56
68
.55
.64
0.224
TPD1
15.
3.
18.
4.
9.
8.
5.
6.
55.
2.
5.
135.
24.
14
99
37
12
27
51
96
85
64
96
15
96
81
0.236 1.556
TPD1 TPD1
Pounds per Day
17.
4.
21.
4.
10.
9.
7.
8.
65.
3.
6.
159.
29.
78
68
57
84
89
99
00
05
33
47
05
65
14
105
27
127
28
64
59
41
47
386
20
35
944
172
.19
.70
.59
.63
.42
.13
.39
.61
.51
.54
.79
.50
.37
0.472
TPD1
31
8
38
8
19
17
12
14
117
6
10
286
52
.91
.40
.70
.68
.54
.94
.56
.44
.24
.23
.86
.50
.29
0.775
TPD1
52
13
63
14
32
29
20
23
192
10
17
470
85
.39
.80
.55
.26
.09
.45
.62
.72
.51
.23
.83
.45
.86
1 Tons per day per substance for the entire county; quantities are from Table III-5-E-A.
2 Population data from USDOC, 1988.
-------
Table III-5-E-9;
EPA Region II mobile source emissions for the covered municipalities of
Union County - Chemical emissions in pounds per day and tons per year
UNION COUNTY
% Population2
Berkeley Heights 2.53
Clark 3.21
Cranford 4.73
Elizabeth 21.03
Fanwood 1.51
Garwood 0.93
Hillside 4.26
Kenilworth 1.60
Linden 7.57
Mountainside 1.39
New Providence 2.41
Plainfield 9.00
Rahway 5.27
Roselle 4.09
Roselle Park 2.59
Scotch Plains 4.31
Springfield 2.82
Summit 4.13
Union 10.27
Westfield 6.00
Winfield 0.35
Portion of total
Union
population: 100.00% L:
Benzene Formaldehyde n-Hexane Toluene o-Xvlene p-Xvlene
0.368
TPD1
18.62
23.63
34.81
154.78
11.11
6.84
31.35
11. 7B
55.72
10.23
17.74
66.24
38.79
30.10
19.06
31.72
20.76
30.40
75.59
44.16
2.58
: 736.00
: 134.32
0.196
TPD1
9.92
12.58
18.54
82.44
5.92
3.65
16.70
6.27
29.67
5.45
9.45
35.28
20.66
16.03
10.15
16.90
11.05
16.19
40.26
23.52
1.37
392.00
71.54
0.230
TPD1
Pounds
11.64
14.77
21.76
96.74
6.95
4.28
19.60
7.36
34.82
6.39
11.09
41.40
24.24
18.81
11.91
19.83
12.97
19.00
47.24
27.60
1.61
460.00
83.95
1.359
TPD1
per Day3
68.77
87.25
128.56
571.60
41.04
25.28
115.79
43.49
205.75
37.78
65.50
244.62
143.24
111.17
70.40
117.15
76.65
112.25
279.14
163.08
9.51
2,718.00
496.04
0.413
TPD1
20.90
26.51
39.07
173.71
12.47
7.68
35.19
13.22
62.53
11.48
19.91
74.34
43.53
33.78
21.39
35.60
23.29
34.11
84.83
49.56
2.89
826.00
150.75
0.677
TPD1
34.26
43.46
64.04
284.75
20.45
12.59
57.68
21.66
102.50
18.82
32.63
121.86
71.36
55.38
35.07
58.36
38.18
55.92
139.06
81.24
4.74
1,354.00
247.11
1 Tons per day per substance for the entire county; quantities are from Table III-5-E-4.
2 Population data from USOOC. 1988.
-------
Table III-5-E-10; EPA Region II mobile source emissions for Brooklyn -
Chemical emissions in pounds per day and tons per year
BROOKLYN
Benzene Formaldehyde n-Hexane Toluene o-Xvlene p-Xvlene
TPD1: 0.553 0.294 0.346 2.045 0.621 1.019
TPY: 201.85 107.31 126.29 746.43 226.67 371.94
*•
o
Table III-5-E-11: EPA Region II mobile source emissions for Staten Island -
Chemical emissions in pounds per day and tons per year
STATEN ISLAND
Benzene Formaldehyde n-Hexane Toluene o-Xvlene p-Xylene
TPD1: 0.413 0.220 0.259 1.528 0.464 0.761
TPY: 150.75 80.30 94.54 557.72 169.36 277.77
1 Tons per day per substance for the entire county; quantities are from Table III-5-E-4.
-------
Microinventory Maps and Tables
The microinventory maps and listings of the identified minor
and major sources within a one-kilometer radius of the project's
air monitoring sites are presented in this section. The sites
are presented in the order in which the microinventories were
conducted.
Figure III-5-8 depicts the Carteret site and the source
locations as plotted by the UTM coordinates obtained from New
Jersey's Air Pollution Enforcement Data System. This map
demonstrates that the states' databases often contained
inaccurate geographic (UTM) data, as noted in the field surveys
by the microinventory teams - compare with Figure III-5-7 and
Table III-5-21.
Note: There were no major or minor sources within the
microinventory area of the Piscataway, NJ, air monitoring site.
A-141
-------
Microinventory Maps and Tables
The microinventory maps and listings of the identified minor
and major sources within a one-kilometer radius of the project's
air monitoring sites are presented in this section. The sites
are presented in the order in which the microinventories were
conducted.
Figure III-5-8 depicts the Carteret site and the source
locations as plotted by the UTM coordinates obtained from New
Jersey's Air Pollution Enforcement Data System. This map
demonstrates that the states' databases often contained
inaccurate geographic (UTM) data, as noted in the field surveys
by the microinventory teams - compare with Figure III-5-7 and
Table III-5-21.
Note; There were no major or minor sources within the
microinventory area of the Piscataway, NJ, air monitoring site.
A-142
-------
Figure III-5-5. Travis/ NY, microinventory site
A-143
-------
Table III-5-20. Major and minor sources identified at Travis microinventory site.
TRAVIS, STATEN ISLAND
NUMBER NAME
ADDRESS
TYPE
EMISSION (T/T)
SHS/A PM VOC
901 Con Edison
902 Galatros Cleaners
903 Rex-R-Us
904 Concrete/Rock Crusher
905 Vanbro Corp.
906 Spencer Recycle
907 Fresh Kills Landfill
908 Fresh Kills Marine Plant
Site Summary
4401 Victory Bvd.
Baron/Victory
Saron/Travis
Meredith Ave.
1900 South Ave.
Spencer Street
Wild Ave./River Front
Wild Ave./River front
Power Plant
Dry Cleaner
Auto Refinishing
Rock Crusher
Concrete and Asphalt Plant
Transfer/Recycling
Landfill
Municipal
SMS 0.01
M.A.
M.A.
M.A.
28.81
N.A.
0.00
SMS
SMS
SMS
0.00
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
0.00
N.A.
3.10
0.18 0.09
This site is exclusively residential with isolated small sources spread throughout the area.
Facility and the landfill, both of which can be seen from miles away.
MAJOR SOURCES:
NONE
MINOR SOURCES:
All eight sourcs are minor. They are broken down as follows:
- one power plant
- one dry cleaner
- one auto refinisher
- one rock crusher
- one asphalt/concrete facility
- one municipal facility
- one landfill
- one transfer/recycling facility
The largest and most visible sources are the Con Edison
-------
Figure III-5-6. Port Richmond, NY/ micro inventory site.
A-145
-------
>_c-_3our_c3_s___ide_nti_fi_e_d_a_t Port Richmond raicrroinyentory site.
Port Richmond, Stolen (stand
T
1201 Cross Siclara
1202 Staten Island Paint t Uaterproof
1203 More Bros.
1204 SIPCO Oil Distributors
1205 Port Richmond POTU
1206 Castleton Bus Depot
1207 Tritto's Iron Works
1209 A. Supino Iron Metals
1209 PIF Iron Works
1210 Score Station
1211 Mobil Station
1212 Citgo Service Station
1213 Getty Service Station
12U Certified Gas Station
1215 Getty Station
1216 American All-Star Station
1217 Mobil Station
1218 Sunoco Station
1219 Hess Station
1220 Central Cleaning t Tailor
1221 Budget Dry Cleaning
1222 Paul Killer Dry Cleaning
1223 Jennifer Dry Cleaners
1224 Richmond Dry Cleaning
1225 Charton Cleaners
1226 Flag Container Services
1227 Lester Kehoe Machinery
1228 Scam Mix Concrete
1229 Antique Brass Works
1230 MeIone t Sons
1231 Piazza Baker/
1232 Raymond Bakery
1233 Renato Imperial Pastry Shoppe
1234 TJ Cinnamon's Bakery
1235 Bakery (no name)
1236 Home of Oven Bake Shop
1237 Artie's Painting Autobody
1238 Tri- Star Auto Body
1239 G I G Custom Autobody
1240 Certified Auto Service
1241 Richmond County Collision
1242 Dependable Autobody & Fender
1243 Two Bros Autobody
1244 Hid Island Auto Body
1245 Fran Kai Auto Body
1246 Jinbo Custom Auto Painting
1247 PHP Auto Body
1240 Naaco Auto Painting
1249 Joe's Ideal Auto Body
Lake & Ualker
49 Jewelt Ave
Granite I LaSalle
2541 Richmond Terrace
Richmond Terrace/Donegan St
Castleton Rd/Rector
1341 Castleton Road
2585 Richmond Terrace
2582 Richmond Terrace
Post/Richmond Ave.
Port Richmond/Van Riper
Port Richmond/Hatfield
Port Richmond/Hatfield
Horning Star Rd/Kalvis
Jewett Av/Post Av
Jewett Av/Forest
Jewett Av/Forest
Forest Av/Uilloubrook
Forest Av/Decker
Port Richmond Ave
Forest Av/UiIloubrook
Forest Av/Livermore
Forest Av/Livermore
Castleton/Port Richmond
Barrett Ave/Forest
Ferry Street
2581 Richmond Terrace
Richmond Terrace
290 Port Richmond Ave
17 Hooker Place
Port Richmond
Jewelt Av/Forest
Forest Av/WiIloubrook
Forest Av/Livermore
96 Vreeland
137 Port Richmond
Richmond Terrace
LaSalle Street
Ferry Street
Clove Rd/Richmond Terr
Ctove Rd/Castleton
Castleton Rd/Rector
99 Hector Street
95 Rector Street
91 Jewett Ave
39 Rector Street
39 Rector Street
2550 Richmond Terrace
25 Rector Street
Paper Hill/Die Casting
Paint Manufacture
Oil/Gas Transfer I Storage
Oil/Gas Transfer I Storage
HYCDEP POTU SMS
NYC Bus Depot SMS
Metalworks
Metal-Recycling (open Burning--
Metal Recycling
Gas Station
Gas Station SMS
Gas Station
Gas Station SMS
Gas Station
Gas Station SMS
Gas Station
Gas Station SMS
Gas Station
Gas Station SMS
Dry Cleaner
Dry Cleaner
Dry Cleaner
Dry Cleaner
Dry Cleaner
Dry Cleaner
Demolition/Rubbish Removal
Degreesing
Concrete Manufacture
Brass Smelter
Bakery (24 Hour)
Bakery
Bakery
Bakery
Bakery
Bakery
Bakery
Auto Refinishing
Auto fief inishing
Auto flefinishing
Auto Sefinlshing
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
SMS
H.
H.
H.
H.
0.
0.
H.
N.
N.
N.
0.
M.
0.
0
6
00
0
00
00
0
SMS
0.
N.
0.
N
0
N.
H.
H.
H.
H.
H.
N.
M.
M.
N.
N.
H.
N.
H.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
H.
N.
H.
M.
0.20
N.A.
H.A.
N.A.
H.A.
H.A.
7.12
0.16
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
10.50
N.A.
1.43
N.A.
4.03
N.A.
1.40
N.A.
6.75
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
M.A.
H.A.
H.A.
N.A.
H.A.
H.A.
0.19
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
H.A.
N.A.
H.A.
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
1.70
N.A.
-------
Table III-5-21. (continued) Port Richmond
1250 OeVille II Auto Collision 2432 Richmond Terrace Auto Refinishing -- N. . N.A.
1251 Saccone Bros. Autobody 2205 Richmond Terrace Auto Refinishing -- N. . N.A.
1252 Central Auto Body 21 Herberton Ave Auto Refinishing -- N. . N.A.
1253 Ted's Rite Way Auto Body 150 Clove Road Auto Refinishing -- N. . N.A.
1254 Perfect Auto Repair 150 Clove Road Auto Refinishing -- N. . N.A.
1255 JiH Autobody 1347 Castleton Road Auto Refinishing -- N. . N.A.
1256 East Coast Auto Body 1335 Castleton Road Auto Refinishing -- N.A. N.A.
Site Sunary
This site was a mix of residential and comnercial establishments evenly distributed throughout the area. There were several main boulevards that
contained comnercial shopping areas, and the area near the Kill Van Kull ton the north edge of the site) was mostly industrial. There was a high
density of auto refinishers in the north area of the site.
MAJOR SOURCES:
NONE
MINOR SOURCES:
All 56 sources located in the microinventory were minor sources. The breakdown of these sources is as follows:
- 20 auto refinishers
- 10 gas stations
> - 7 bakeries
I - 6 dry cleaners
JT| - 2 oil/gas transfer & storage facilities
«>i - 2 metal recycling facilities
- the rest are comprised of: a paper mill/die casting facility, a paint manufacturer, a POTU, a bus depot, a demolition & rubbish
removal facility, a degreaser, a concrete manufacturer and a brass smelter.
-------
Figure III-5-7. Carteret, NJ, microinventory site.
A-148
-------
>
(—'
«•
03
C
rs
(D
•-< 4.494
i
Oo
^* fl *O
TJ fri I—'
ei n o
O rr rr
1 O
QJ (0 Hi
Of rr
n- 3
pJ CO fli
CT H-LJ.
pi rr O
to O n
IV
5 WILSEV fC-ODS INC.
6. fOSTEfl WHEELEfi
7 KARL KOCH ERECTING
6 2EISEL OUALfTY MACHI
9. ALWAYS EGlllPMENT COft
10. M.C. MANUFACTURING
11, BUTLEfi CORPpfSATIOH.
12, EASTERN VALVE SERVIC
13 INTERNATIONAL TPANSP
14 FMC CORPORATIO >
15 INTERNATIONAL BAKERA
16. P & E AUTOBODY
17. CARTEftET BUS SERVICE
16. CARTERET AUTOBODY
19. ROCHEAUX INTERNAIIOJ
20. AMAX BASE UETALS RES
21. STAfLEX SPECIALTi ES
22. ANCHOR ABRASIVES COR
23 SUPREME DRY CLEANING
24 OE LA 1C* HE
25 AUOCC- STATION
26 HOFFMAN PRINTING
27 SffAR'S MOBIL
26. QUALITY COLUSON RE
29. VALONE'S WHOLESALE C
30. CARTERET DISCOUNT AU
3t. CONCORD PLASTICS INC
32 GATX
33. LABORATORY SERVICES
34. INDOL COLOR COMPANY
35 BASF
36 SPEEDWA5H LAUNDRETTE
-------
in
O
Table III-5-2.1. Wa;jot and minoc soucces at Carteret, NJ microinventory site.
Carteret. New Jersey
NUMBER NAME
101 CARTERET STP
102 SOG AGGREGATE RECYCLING CONCRETE/ASPHALT
103 UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
104 UNOCAL CHEMICALS DIVISION
105 UILSEY FOODS INC.
106 FOSTER WHEELER
107 KARL KOCH ERECTING
108 2EISEL QUALITY MACHINE TOOLS
109 ALUAYS EQUIPMENT CORP
110 M.C. MANUFACTURING
111 BUTLER CORPORATION, H.F.
112 EASTERN VALVE SERVICE INC.
113 INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
114 FMC CORPORATION
115 INTERNATIONAL BAKERAGE.INC.
116 P t E AUTOBOOY
117 CARTERET BUS SERVICE INC
118 CARTERET AUTOBOOY
119 ROCHEAUX INTERNATIONAL
120 AMAX BASE METALS RESEARCH AND DEV. INC.
121 STAFLEX SPECIALTY ESTERS
122 ANCHOR ABRASIVES CORP.
123 SUPREME DRY CLEANING
124 DE LA TORRE
125 AMOCO STATION
126 HOFFMAN PRINTING
127 SITAR'S MOBIL
128 QUALITY COLLISION REPAIRS
129 VALONE'S WHOLESALE COOKIE OUTLET
130 CARTERET DISCOUNT AUTOPARTS. AUTOBOOY
131 CONCORD PLASTICS INC
132 GATX
133 LABORATORY SERVICES INC.
134 INDOL COLOR COMPANY
135 BASF
136 SPEEDUASH LAUNDRETTE & DRY CLEANERS
137 GULF STATION
138 AMOCO OIL COMPANY
139 AMOCO OIL COMPANY
140 FRESH KILLS LANDFILL
ADDRESS
339 Roosevelt
377 Roosevelt
350 Roosevelt Avenue
350 Roosevelt Avenue
351 Roosevelt Avenue
377 Roosevelt Avenue
377 Roosevelt Avenue
377 Roosevelt Avenue
377 Roosevelt Avenue
377 Roosevelt Avenue
377 Roosevelt Avenue
377 Roosevelt Avenue
367 Roosevelt Avenue
500 Roosevelt Avenue
377 Roosevelt Avenue
188 Roosevelt Avenue
1375 Roosevelt Avenue
188 Roosevelt Avenue
100 Middlesex Avenue
400 Middlesex Avenue
400 Middlesex Avenue
400 Middlesex Avenue
Per sh ing t Roosevelt
89 Roosevelt Avenue
S E Grant I Port Reading
29 Washington Avenue
150 Washington Avenue
Linden & Washington
46 Washington Avenue
35 Cook Avenue
31 Lafayette Street
78 Lafayette Street
85 Lafayette Street
Leffert Street
Roosevelt t Grant
779 Roosevelt (& Grant)
Washington/Roosevelt
756 Roosevelt (& Washington)
Roosevelt I Grant
STATEN ISLAND
TYPE
Sewage Treatment Plant
Concrete and Asphalt Plant
Oil/Gas Transfer & Storage
Chemical Manufacturer
Bakery
Machine manufacturer
Builders
Tools (Had gas pump)
Machine manufacturer
Machine manufacturer
Machine Manufacturer
Machine Manufacturer
Trucking Company
Bulk Powders Manufacturer
Bakery
Auto Refinishing
Gas Station & Bus Depot
Auto Refinishing
Miscellaneous Storage
Secondary Nonferrous Metals
Chemical Manufacturer
Sand-blasting
Dry Cleaners
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
Printing
Gas Station
Auto Refinishing
Bakery
Auto Refinishing
Injection Molders
Oil/Gas Transfer & Storage
Retro-Chemical Testing
Inorganic Pigments
Chemicals Manufacturing
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
Gas Station
Oil/Gas Transfer t Storage
LANDFILL
SMS/A
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
SMS
PM
0.00
0.11
0.00
10.44
1.94
0.00
1.20
1.34
0.00
0.01
2.01
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.40
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
voc
54.37
0.20
1.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
10.95
0.00
1.70
31.54
?
10.95
10.95
998.98
0.08
?
32.81
784.12
1.14
Site Sumnarv
The site is predominantly residential, except for the area along the Arthur Kill River which is highly industrialized. Across the Arthur Kill, in
Staten Island, is the Fresh Kills Landfill. It is the largest landfill in the world.
-------
Table III-5-22. (continued) Carteret
MAJOR SOURCES:
0103. Union Oil Company of California - 54.37 Tons/Yr of VOC - mostly gasoline and methylene chloride.
0114. FMC Corporation - listed in APEOS as a najor source, but does not emit any appreciable amounts of pollutants monitored for in the
Study.
0132. GATX Terminals - 999 Tons/Tr of VOC - mostly gasoline, also considerable quantities of nethylene chloride, toluene, hexane, xylenes,
styrene. Methyl ethyl ketone and acetone.
0139. Amoco Oil Company - 784 Tons/Yr of VOC - all gasoline
MINOR SOURCES:
There are 36 minor sources that were located during the microinventory. The breakdown is as follows:
- Three dry Cleaners
- Six Cas Stations (or facilities uith gas pumps)
- Six Kachiie Manufactures or Builders
- Four Autt Refinishers
- Three Small Chemical Manufacturers
- Three Bakeries
- The remaining sources are: a small sewage treatment plant, a metals manufacturer, a concrete t asphalt plant, a trucking company,
a sandblasting company, an injection molder, a storage facility, a chemical testing lab, a pigment manufacturer, a printer, a monster
landfill.
-------
Figure III-5-9. Elizabeth, NJ, microinventory site
A-152
-------
Table III-5-23. Major and minor sources at Elizabeth microinventory site.
Elizabeth, Hen Jersey
Ho. NAME
ADDRESS
TYPE
tNVEN PH
voc
r
M
Ut
U>
2001 PAOLUCCI AUTO CARE (GULF)
2002 JORGE'S AUTOBODY SHOP
2003 HANACO'S AUTO CENTER (CETCO)
2004 LOUIS' AUTO REPAIR
2005 NJ DOT BAYUAY CENTER
2006 ENVELOPES I PRINTING CO INC
2007 ELIZABETH BOLT/NUT MANUFACTURING CORP.
2008 MONARCH METAL FABRICATORS
2009 TOWN OF ELIZABETH RECTC. CENT.
2010 CRIMCOU WOODWORK CO. INC.
2011 MOBIL STATION
2012 ELIZABETH GENERAL MEDICAL CENTEfi
2013 ONE-STOP GULF STATION
2014 GETTY STATION
2015 SHELL STATION
2016 GETTY STATION
2017 ABBA PRODUCTS
2018 JEFFERSON HIGH SCHOOL INCINERATOR
2019 SARACENO'S BAKERY
2020 IVORY AUTO BOOT SHOP
2021 EXXON STATION
2022 GROVER CLEVELAND JHS BOILER
2023 EXXON STATION (MARA SERVICE?)
2024 MARA BAKERY
2025 EARLY BIRO CLEANERS
2C26 REYNOLD'S CLEANERS
2027 EASTERN SAMPLE SERVICE
2028 ALEX1AN BROS HOSPITAL
2029 PORT TRUCK REPAIR
2030 PORTUGUESE AUTO REPAIR
2031 NEW YORK PETERS CORP
2032 NJ TRANSIT BUS GARAGE
2033 O.K. PRt CLEANERS
2034 NA-VET PRINTING CO.
203S SUPER CAKE BAKERY
2036 LEMY DRY CLEANERS
2037 SCORE GAS
2038 JERSEY PRIDE FOODS (PAPETTI)
2039 KANSAS J. STANLEY MARINE SUPPLIES
2040 AIRDYNE INDUSTRIES
2041 ELIZABETH TRUCK STOP
2042 AMOCO STATION
2043 EBONY CLEANERS
2044 THOMAS I BETTS CORP
2045 JIS CUSTOM CAR CARE
2046 PROCTOR t GAMBLE CORP.
2047 LOIZEAUX BUILDING SUPPLY CO
SOUTH 51H ST. AND 5TH AVE.
SOUTH 5T« ST. AND 5TH AVE.
SOUTH 5TH ST. AND 4TH AVE.
SOUTH 5TH ST. AW 4TH AVE.
TRENTON AVE. AND 4TH AVE.
57 S. SPRING ST
65 SOUTH SPRING ST.
SOUTH SPRING AND 3RD AVE.
SOUTH SPRING AND 3RD AVE.
160 SPRING ST.
200 SPRING SI.
925 E. JERSEY ST.
1002 f. JERSEY ST. & SPRING ST
1101 E. JERSEY ST C MADISON
E. SCOTT t ELIZABETH AVE.
ELIZABETH t V. HRAVLAG
1004 ELIZABETH AVE
E. JERSEY ST & MORRELL AVE
CENTRE ST I 3RD AVE
S. FIFTH SI C 3RD AVE
S. FIFTH ST t 3RD AVE
1ST AVE 1 RANKIN ST
ELIZABETH AVE i 5TH ST
ELIZABETH AVE I 5TH ST
FRANKLIN ST ( 7TH ST
FRANKLIN ST t 7TH ST
£59 MARSHALL AVE (t 7THJ
E. JERSEY ST t 7TH ST
7TH ST SET 8WAV 4 S. PARK
700 COURT STREET
805 GRAND ST.
LIVINGSTON ST. S DIVISION ST.
521 ELIZABETH AVE.
506 ELIZABETH AVE.
5TH t FULTON STS.
5TH t JERSEY STS.
5TH t LIVINGSTON STS.
PAPETTI PLAZA
PAPETTI PLAZA
455 TRUMBULL AVE.
61H t BONO SIS.
1ST ST. I ELIZABETH AVE.
SOUTH 2ND ST. t ELIZABETH AVE.
36 BUTLER ST.
137 ELIZABETH AVE.
40 WESTERN AVE (STATEN ISLAND)
40 S. FRONT ST
M>EOS
Gas Station
Auto Refinishing
Gas Station
Gas Station
Transportation (gas station)
Printing
Metals Manufacturing
Metals Manufacturing
Recycling
Furniture Manufacturing
Gas Station
Hospital (incinerator)
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Bird seed manufacturer
Incinerator
Bakery
Auto Refinishing
Gas Station
Boiler
Gas Station
Bakery
Dry Cleaners
Dry Cleaners
UNKNOWN
Hospital (incinerator)
Gas Station
Auto Refinishing
Printing, Paper Products
Transportation (gas station) APEDS
Dry Cleaners
Printing
Bakery
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
Food Products APEDS
UNKNOWN
Propane Filling Station
Gas Station APEDS
Gas Station APEDS
Dry Cleaners
Electrical Products APEDS
Auto Refinishing
Soap t detergent manufecturerSMS
Cement manufacturer (1 gas puAPEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEOS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEOS 0
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
0,00
NA
0.00
O.GO
0.00
NA
NA
KA
NA
0.01
0.00
1.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
00
HA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
0.45
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.04
NA
NA
0.00
C.OO
NA
7.24
NA
0.71
0.11
10.95
NA
10.95
10.95
27.38
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.13
10.95
0.00
10.95
10.95
38.35
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
30.63
NA
38.32
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
0.70
HA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
10.95
32.85
NA
0.00
NA
1.33
0.00
-------
Table III-5-23 . (continued) Elizabeth
J
Cn
*•
2048 CHEVRON USA TANK FARM
2049 CROWN PETROLEUM CORP
2050 CROOA STORAGE INC
2051 ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND CORP
2052 JOSEPH CORY
2053 PHELPS DODGE BUTLER COPPER PRODUCTS
2054 i t 80 EXXON BAYWAY REFINERY
2055 REICHHOID CHEMICAL CORP
2056 OLYMPIA TRIALS BUS DEPOT.
2057 JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX AND UNION POTU
2058 CYCLE CHEMICAL
2059 B1LKAYS EXPRESS CO.
2060 ELIZABETHTOUN GAS PRODUCTION PLANT
2061 ELIZABETH BAKERY INC.
2062 LAMETEX CORP
2063 APEX CHEMICAL CO.
2064 SNOW LAUNDROMAT t CLEANERS
2065 TRIXEIRA'S BAKERY
2066 COSMOS TAILOR t CLEANERS
2067 MASTER PRINTING
2068 AMOCO GAS
2069 SHELL GAS
2070 VINCENT'S TAILORS £ DRY CLEANING
2071 ABC PRINTING CO.
2072 AVIS RENTAL
2073 EXXON GAS
2074 EXXON RESEARCH t TECHNOLOGY
2075 BP GAS STATION
2076 EDGAR RD. TANK WORKS
2077 MAPES I SPROWL CORP.
207B PARK CUSTOM HOLDING
2079 CONVERTERS (NK
2080 SEE * 54
2081 ROTUBA EXTRUDERS
2082 HERTZ PENSKE
2083 ETO STERILIZATION COS'
2084 LAMINATED PAPER PRODLCTS
2085 SIMMONS INC
2086 AMOCO GAS
2087 EXXON GAS STATION
2088 METRO 1 GAS
2089 SANTILLO ITALIAN BREAD AND PIZZA
2090 ELIZABETH CENTRAL HOSPITAL
2091 GtJ MOBIL SERVICE CENTER
2092 SOUTH BROAD TAILORS t CLEANERS
2093 TOKYO CLEANERS
2094 UNLABLED GAS STATION
2095 J1D EXXON
2096 HOSCARITULO BROS. GETTY STATION
2097 CIRCLE FUEL OIL
2098 CITGO GAS
2099 BELLOHO FUEL CO
S. FRONT ST
450 S. FRONT
534 S. FRONT
554 S. FRONT
666 S. FRONT
BAYUAY t S.
ST
ST
ST
ST
FROHT ST
END OF S. FRONT ST
726 ROCKEFELLER AVE
BAYUAY AVE. NEAR ROCKEFELLER
500 SOUTH FIRST ST.
217 SOUTH 1ST ST.
BILKAYS BLVD & THIRD AVE.
3RD AVE. i FLORIDA ST.
52 GENEVA ST.
BUTLER t 3RD STS.
200 SOUTH 1ST ST.
163 WASHINGTON AVE.
161 WASHINGTON AVE.
304 WASHINGTON AVE.
302 WASHINGTON AVE.
BAYWAY CIRCLE t RT. 1
BAYWAY CIRCLE t RT. 1
731 WASHINGTON AVE.
741 WASHINGTON AVE.
RT. 1&9 OFF WASHINGTON AVE.
RT. U9 OFF WORTH AVE.
RT. 1&9 OFF WORTH AVE.
RT. 1&9 OFF PARK AVE.
RT. 1&9 OFF GILCHRIST
BEDLE t BACHELLER ST.
940 PARK AVE.
1301 SO. PARK AVE. (LINDEN)
SO. PARK AVE
1401 SO. PARK AVENUE
1450 PARK AVENUE
2500 BRUNSWICK AVE
2500 BRUNSWICK AVE
2550 BRUNSWICK AVE
PULASKI t BAYONNE AVE
BAYUAY AVE t MCKIHLEY ST
RT. 1&9 I BAYWAY CIRCLE
641 BROAD ST.
BROAD t PEARL STS.
211 BROAD ST.
458 SO. BROAD ST.
560 SOUTH BROAD ST.
RT. 149 OFF GRIER ST.
RT. U9 OFF HETFIELD
RT. U9 OFF FILMORE ST.
RT. 149 OFF FILMORE ST.
RT. 1&9 OFF GRIER ST.
RT. 149 OFF ALLEN ST.
Oil/Gas Transfer I Storage
Oil/Gas Transfer t Storage
Oil/Gas Transfer t Storage
Oil/Gas Transfer t Storage
Furniture Manufacturing
Copper manufacturing
Oil/Gas Transfer t Storage
Chenical manufacturer
Transportation (gas station)
POTW
Chemical manufacturer
Trucking
Bulk Storage
Bakery
UNKNOWN
Chemical manufacturing
Dry cleaners
Bakery
Dry cleaners
Printing
Gas Station
Gas Station
Dry Cleaning
Printing
Gas Station
Gas Station
Research t Development
Gas Station
Auto Refinishing
Hetals Manufacturing
Plastics manufacturing
Ink manufacturer
Plastics manufacturing
Transportation (gas station)
Ethyl ene oxide sterilization
Paper products
Bedding Manufacturers
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Bakery
Hospital (incinerator)
Gas Station
Dry Cleaning
Dry Cleaning
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
--
APEDS
APEOS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
--
APEDS
APEDS
--
APEDS
--
--
APEDS
--
--
--
--
APEDS
APEOS
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
APEDS
APEDS
--
APEDS
--
APEDS
--
APEDS
--
--
APEDS
APEDS
--
--
• -
APEDS
APEDS
--
APEOS
APEDS
HA
NA
2.54
6.18
12.47
0.82
HA
HA
NA
0.00
0.59
HA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.97
1.50
NA
0.00
NA
0.10
NA
0.00
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
NA
NA
NA
0.00
0.00
NA
0.00
0.00
NA
10.19
9.07
0.44
0.00
0.00
1440.65
63.57
NA
74.95
1.49
HA
32.85
NA
NA
0.00
NA
NA
NA
NA
10.95
10.95
HA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
72 .44
0.00
NA
0.04
NA
0.00
NA
48.49
MA
NA
0.00
38.26
NA
NA
NA
10.95
10.95
HA
10.95
10.95
-------
Table III-5-23. (continued) Elizabeth
2100 AMERICAN PRINTING CO. 328 ELIZABETH ST. Printing -- NA NA
2101 ADA LAUNDROMAT I DRY CLEANING 10 SOUTH 1ST ST. Dry Cleaning -- NA NA
2102 HIM PRINTING 5 2ND STREET Printing -- NA NA
2103 FONSECA CLEANERS 11 RD ST. Dry Cleaners APEDS 0.00 ?
2104 STEEL BRITE POLISHING 127 FRANKLIN ST Metal Polishing -- NA NA
2105 FRANCALANCIA BAKERY 85 2ND ST Bakery -- HA NA
2106 FONSECA GETTY 2ND ST t E. JERSEY ST Gas Station APEDS 0.00 10.95
2107 EL ALCAZAR BAKERY t PIZZERIA 108 EAST JERSEY ST Bakery -- NA NA
2108 EXACT ANODIZING CORP LIVINGSTON ST Electroplating •- NA NA
2109 FLAMINGO BAKERY 120 3RD ST Bakery .- NA NA
2110 CONTINENTAL WELDING CO 336 LIVINGSTON ST Uelder -- NA NA
2111 UNLABLED GAS STATION SO PARK AV & 3RD ST Gas Station -- NA NA
2112 JOSPEH'S AUTO BODY SO PARK AV I 1ST Auto Refinishing -- NA NA
2113 HlH AUTO BODY SO PARK AV & 1ST Auto Refinishing -- NA NA
2114 BELTS PLASTICS PRODUCTS 160-166 1ST ST Injection Molding -- NA NA
2115 PORT SERVICE GARAGE 311 MAGNOLIA AVE Gas Station APEDS 0.00 10.95
2116 GARCIA UNIFORM PINE & 1ST STS Clothier -- NA NA
2117 AMOCO GAS STATION 3RD t PINE STS Gas Station -- NA NA
> 2118 BON-ART INTERNATIONAL INC 325 PINE ST Manufacturing APEDS 0.03 11.55
^ 2119 CUSTOM BANDAG PINE t 4TH STS Tire retreading APEOS 0.09 1.74
in
i* Site Summary
This site contained, by far, the most number of sources found in any site area in all 15 microinventories. It was extremely comroercialized with many
small sources interspersed with residences. The area along the banks of the Arthur Kill was heavily industrialized, including large sources such as
Exxon Bayway.
MAJOR SOURCES:
2054 C 2080. Exxon Layway Refinery - 1440.65 Tons/yr of VOC - mostly gasoline and xylene.
2050. Croda Storage - 9.07 Tons/yr VOC ft 2.54 PM - but no emissions of pollutants considered in Sl/NJ UATAP.
2049. Crown Petroleum - 20.19 Tons/Yr of gasoline.
2055. Reichotd Chemical - 63.57 Tons/Yr of VOC - mostly toluene and xylene, smaller amounts of gasoline, formaldehyde, styrene, methyl and
ethyl ketone and acetone.
MINOR SOURCES:
There are 114 minor sources that were located during the microinventory. The breakdown is as follows:
- 37 gas stations/gas distributors
- 12 dry cleaners
- 9 bakeries
- 7 auto refinishers
- 7 printers
- 5 boilers/incinerators
- 4 metals manufacturers
- 3 furniture manufacturers
- 2 chemical manufacturers
- 2 oil/gas transfer t storage facilities
- 2 plastics manufacturers
- the remaining are: a sewage treatment plant, three unknown facilities, a recycling facility, a bird seed manufacturer, a food
manufacturer, a propane filling station, an electrical products manufacturer, a soap/detergent manufacturer, a cement producer, a
trucking company, a bulk storage terminal, a petroleum research facility, an ink manufacturer, an ethylene oxide sterilizer, a paper
-------
Table III-5-23. (continued) Elizabeth
producer, a metal polisher, an electroplater, a welder, an injection molder, a clothier, a tire ret reader, an unknown type of
manufacturer, a food distitutor, a toiletry manufacturer, a general woodworking facility, a chemical manufacturer, a cannery, an
industrial gas distributor, a bakery, and a school.
t
i-*
Ul
-------
Figure III-5-10. Sewaren, NJ, microinventory site
A-157
-------
Table 111-5-2^. Ma^oc and minor sources at Sewaren microinventory site.
Sewaren, New Jersey
Ho. NAME
301 AMERADA HESS COOP. REF INERT
302 PSEtG GAS TURBINE GENERATOR
303 UOOOBRIDGE TOWNSHIP POTW
304 UOOOBRIOGE MARINA
30S ROYAL PETROLEUM
306 DANNY'S AUTOMOTIVE CONNECTION
307 GENHA CLEANERS
308 McCANN'S AUTO BODY
309 NOVEL LITHOGRAPHERS
310 ALLIED OLD ENGLISH
311 GENERAL BROOM INC
312 US GYPSUM CO. PORT READING PLANT
313 ROYAL FOOD DISTRIBUTORS
314 COLONIAL PIPELINE
315 ECOLAB
316 PILOT LABS INC
317 PROCTOR ft GAMBLE
318 SEYMOUR FRANKS
319 VAN UATERS C ROGERS INC
320 COLUMBIA CAN COMPANY
321 BOC DISTRIBUTION SERVICES
322 BRENNAN BROTHERS
323 D'ORSI BAKERY
324 MATTHEW JAGO SCHOOL
325 NJ TURNPIKE SERVICE AREA
326 DRV CLEAN AMERICA
327 TEXACO STATION
328 UOODBRIDGE OLDS
329 TED'S CLEANERS
330 SHELL OIL COMPANY
331 CP CHEMICAL
ADDRESS
CLIFF ROAD
CLIFF ROAD
CLIFF ROAD
62 CLIFF ROAD
CLIFF ROAD (below FERRY ST)
161 PORT READING AVE
RAHUAY AVE
RAHUAY AVE
20 HARKLEY STREET
100 MARKLEY STREET
200 MARKLEY STREET
300 MARKLEY STREET
215 BLAIR ROAD
'400 BLAIR ROAD
411 BLAIR ROAD
267 HOMESTEAD AVE
100 ESSEX AVE
135 ESSEX AVE
160 ESSEX AVE
180 ESSEX AVE
135 ESSEX AVE
200 ESSEX AVE
479 PORT READING AVE
GLEN COVE AVE
NJ TNPK MILE POST 92.9
10 MAIN STREET
475 RAHUAY AVE
475 RAHUAY AVE
460 RAHUAY AVE
111 STATE STREET
111 STATE STREET
TYPE
Oil/Gas Transfer I Storage
Power Plant
Sewage Treatment Plant
Boat Marine w/ gas punps
Oil/Gas Transfer & Storage
Gas Station
Dry Cleaners
Auto Refinishing
Printing
UNKNOWN
Warehouse
Gypsun manufacturing
food distributors
Oil/Gas Transfer & Storage
UNKNOWN
UNKNOWN
Toiletry manufacturing
General Woodworking
Chemical manufacturing
Cannery
Industrial gas distributor
Oil /Gas Transfer & Storage
Bakery
School Boiler
Gas Station
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
Auto Refinishing
Dry Cleaners
Oil/Gas Transfer & Storage
Chemical manufacturing
INVEN
APEDS
..
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
APEOS
APEDS
--
--
..
--
--
--
APEDS
--
--
APEDS
--
APEDS
--
--
APEDS
--
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
-•
APEDS
APEDS
APEDS
--
1
H.I
U.I
H.I
H.I
O.I
O.I
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
0.
N.
N.
0.
N.
0.
N.
N.
0.(
NJ
O.i
o.;
0.(
N./
0.(
NJ
O.I
NJ
>M
\.
\.
\.
1.
90
10
f
f
f
f
9
#
.
0
»
.
9
.
0
»
»
)0
\.
JO
!1
)0
t.
10
\.
)0
I.
voc
1285.00
N.A.
N.A.
32.85
137.92
32.85
N.A.
N. .
N. .
N. .
N. .
N. .
N. .
94. 2
N. .
N. .
3.21
N.A.
2.04
N.A.
N.A.
10.95
N.A.
0.00
10.95
0.06
N.A.
1.56
N.A.
6343.60
N.A.
Site Summary
The sit* is predominantly residential, except for heavily industrialized areas along the banks of the Arthur Kill River. The New Jersey Turnpike cuts
across the site, almost in the middle. Outside of the immediate 1km radius, there is a cluster of industry to the north, on or near Essex Ave and
Blair Road. On Rahway Ave, to the west, there are a number of stores and gas stations.
MAJOR SOURCES:
1. Amerada Hess Corp. Refinery - 1285 Tons/Yr of VOC - mostly gasoline and hexane
2. Royal Petroleum Corp. - 137.92 Tons/yr of VOC - mostly gasoline and hexane.
3. C.P. Chemical - listed in APEDS as a major source, but no emissions of pollutants considered in SINJUATAP.
4. Colonial Pipeline - 94.32 Tons/yr of VOC - mostly gasoline and hexane
5. Shell Of I Company - 6343.6 Tons/yr of VOC - mostly gasoline, but also includes acetone, methyl ethyl fee tone, xylenes, toluene, and methylene
chloride.
6. Economics laboratory (Ecolab) - Listed as a major source; but of the pollutants in SINJUATAP there are only 1.76 Tons/yr of formaldehyde.
7. PSEtG Generating Station - listed as a major source in APEDS, emissions unknown.
-------
Table III-5-24. (continued) Sewacen
MINOR SOURCES:
There are 24 minor sources that were located during the microinventory. The breakdown is as follows:
- five gas station/gas distributors
- two dry cleaners
- two auto refinishers
IMW auiw i ci IIIIBIICI a
- the remaining are: a small sewage treatment plant, a print shop, two unknown facilities, a broom warehouse, a gypsum manufacturer, a food
distributor, a toiletry manufacturer, a general woodworking facility, a chemical manufacturer, a cannery, a industrial gas distributor, a
bakery, and a school.
T
•—
Ul
-------
Figure III-5-11. Great Kills, NY, microinventory site.
A-160
-------
Table III-5-25. Major and minor sources at Great Kills miccoinventory site.
Great Kids, Staten Island
Mo. NAME
ADDRESS
TYPE
1NVEN
PH
VOC
401 SOUTH SHORE CLEANERS
402 DANIELLE'S FRENCH CLEANERS
403 RICHMOND OUT CLEANERS
404 EMPIRE CLEANERS t LAUNDERERS
405 JIR PRINTING
406 YUKON CLEANERS & TAILORS
407 GULF STATION (3 STAR SERVICE)
408 CERTIFIED GAS STATION
409 ANSAL DRY CLEANERS
410 CHARIOT AUTO BOD?
411 PAUL MILLER DRY CLEANERS
412 BARRY'S AUTO BOOT
413 VENEZ1A BAKERY
414 GUIDO'S DRY CLEANING
415 CITGO STATION (MENDEL REPAIR)
416 GATEWAY TAILORS t, DRY CLEANERS
417 COTTAGE GAS
418 GETTY STATION
419 PUBLIC SCHOOL B
420 01 NO CLASSIC CLEANER?
421 DONUTVILLE BAKERY & lASTRIES
422 GETTY STATION
423 MOBIL STATION
424 GREAT KILLS BOAT YARD
425 MOBIL STATION
Site Sunnary
NELSON AVE t BROUER CT
GIFFORDS AVE.I MARGARET AVE
GIFFORDS AVE I MARGARET AVE
RICHMOND AVE I SYLVIA AVE
RICHMOND I ELTINGVILLE(UEST)
RICHMOND t ELTINGVILLE(EAST)
RICHMOND t AHBOY AVES.
AMBOr t PRESTON AVES.
RICHMOND t OAKDALE AVES.
R1DGECREST t AMBOY AVES.
AHBOY ROAD (ABOVE OLD AMBOY)
AMBOY t OLD AMBOY ROADS
AMBOr I ST ALBAMS
ST ALBANS NEAR AMBOY
WALNUT t HYLAN AVES.
WALNUT I HYLAN AVES.
4463 AMBOY ROAD
4275 AKBOY ROAD
LIKDENWOOO t SCARSDALE AVES.
HYLAN I GLOVER AVES.
HYLAN bet. UIKAN & NELSON
4244-4248 KYLAN BLVD
3981 HYLAN BLVD
183 MANSION AVE
3701 AMBOY ROAD
Dry Cleaners
Dry Cleaners
Dry Cleaners
Dry Cleaners
Printing
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
Gas Station
Dry Cleaners
Auto Refinishing
Dry Cleaners
Auto Refinishing
Bakery
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
Gas Station
School Boiler
Dry Cleaners
Bakery
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
SMS
SMS
N.
N.
N.
N.
N,
SMS N,
N.
N.
N.
N.
N
N
N.
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
5.29
N.
N.
N.
N.
2. 0
H.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
N.A.
2.13
2.94
N.A.
H.A.
N.A.
4.08
1.12
0.40
1.71
The site is very residential. There are no major industrial sources in the area. In fact, the only areas that have any commerce at all are on or near Hylan
Btvd or Anfcoy Road.
MAJOR SOURCES:
NONE
MINOR SOURCES:
- There are 25 minor sources that were located during the microinventory. The breakdown is as follows:
- nine gas stations
- ten dry cleaners
- two bakeries
- two auto refinishers
- the remaining sources are: a school and a printer.
-------
Figure III-5-12. Tottenvilie, NY, microinvsntory site
A-162
-------
Table III-5-26 Major and minor sources identified at Tottenville microinventory site.
TottenvHle. Staten Island
No.
NAME
ADDRESS
TYPE
INVEM
PM
voc
T
U)
501 CITGO STATION (VALLEY GAS)
502 VIM SERVICE GASETERIA
503 AM CLEANERS
504 PUBLIC SCHOOL 1
505 INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL 34
506 TOTTENVILLE BAKERY t PASTRY SHOPPE
507 JIR COLLISION AUTO BODY
508 NASSAU AUTO REPAIR
509 NASSAU SHELTER
510 JOHNSON CHEMICAL COMPANY
511 ACE AUTO STYLING
512 ACCO AUTOBODY
513 PREMIERE CLEANERS
Site Stnwary
7226 AMBOY ROAD (PAST PAGE)
6778 HYLAN i PAGE AVES.
AMBOY ROAD & UDOO AVE
SUMMIT C YETMAN AVES.
SUMMIT t YETMAN AVES.
SLIEGHT AVE & AMBOY ROAD
FISHER I ARTHUR KILL ROADS
ARTHUR KILL t NASSAU ROADS
NASSAU ROAD
ELLIS STREET
ELLIS STREET
SOUTH BRIDGE STREET
PAGE AVE t AMBOY ROAD
Gas Station SMS N.
Gas Station SMS N.
Dry Cleaners SMS N.
School Boiler -- N.
School Boiler -- N.
Bakery -- N.
Auto Refinishing -- N.
Auto Refinishing -- N.
Copper Smelter SMS N.
Pesticide Manufacturer -- N.
Auto Refinishing -- N.
Auto Refinishing -- N.
Dry Cleaners -- N.
1.80
5.47
N.A.
N.A.
N.
N.
N.
0.
N.
N.
N.
N.
7
This site is almost entirely residential. The area along the Arthur Kill, to the west of the train tracks, is the only area with industry.
there are scattered facilities on or near either Hylan Blvd or Amboy Road.
MAJOR SOURCES:
NONE
Other than that.
MINOR SOURCES:
There are 13 minor sources that were located during the microinventory.
The breakdown is as follows:
four auto refinisKers
two dry cleaners
two gas stations
two schools
the remaining sources are: a pesticide manufacturer, a copper smelter, and a bakery.
-------
Figure III-5-13. Highland Park, NJ, microinventory site,
A-164
-------
Table III-5-27. Major and minor sources identified at Highland Park microinventory site
Highland Park. New Jersey
No.
NAME
ADDftCSS
TYPE
INVEH PM
Site Sunmary
This site is predominantly residential, except for business districts along Raritan and Woodbridge Avenues.
MAJOR SOURCES:
1411. ACNE AUTOBODY - Listed in APEDS as a najor A2 source. Emits only 0.92 Tons/Year of Toluene.
MINOR SOURCES:
There were 15 Minor sources that were located during the micoinventory. The breakdown is as follows:
- seven gas stations/gas distributors
- five dry cleaners
- three auto refinishers (that are minor sources)
VOC
1401 HIGHLAND PARK PUBLIC WORKS BLOC.
1402 RACEWAY MOBIL
1403 GULF SERVICE STATION
1404 TEXACO STATION
1405 SUNOCO STATION
1406 t HOUR MARTIMIZIKG
1407 GULF SERVICE STATION
1408 RAINBOW CLEANERS
1409 MOBIL STATION
1410 NISSAN AUTO SERVICE
1411 ACNE AUTOBOOY (MAJOR A2?>
1412 MODERN TREND
1413 EL HESCfll AUTO
1414 HIGHLAND PARK LAUNDRY
1415 HIGHLAND PARK CLEANERS
1416 DENARCOS DRY CLEANING
VALEHT1ME STREET
CEDAR t RARITAN AVENUE
RARITAN 1ST AVE
RARITAN 1ST AVE
BARIUM 2ND AVE
RAR11AM 2ND fcVE
RARITAN 7TH AVE
R ARM AM 7TH AVE
RARITAN WOOD BRIDGE AVE
DARTMOUTH & WOODBRJDGE
UOODBRIDGE t, COLUMBIA
UOOOBRIDGE ( COLUMBIA
UOODBRIDGE 1 COLUMBIA
WOOOBHJDCE & 9TH AVE
RARITAN t 4TH AVE
4TH AVENUE
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Dry Cleaners
Dry Cleaners
Dry Cleaners
APEDS N.
N.
N.
N
APEOS N.
APEDS N.
N.
N.
N.
N.
APEDS N.
APEDS N.
APEDS N.
N.
APEOS N.
N.
. 21.90
N.A.
N.A.
10.95
• N * •
N. .
• H • •
• N • •
• N • •
0.90
0.16
0.39
H.A.
H.A.
N.A.
-------
Figure III-5-14. Rossville, NY, microinventory
site.
A-166
-------
Table III-5-28. Major and minor sources identified at RossviJle microinventory site.
Rossvilie Site, Staten Island
No.
NAME
ADDRESS
TYPE
INVEN
PM
voc
T
>—
ON
-J
1001 US METALS ft AREA
1002 NTNEX BUILDING (AT MONITOR)
1003 WOQOROU DRY CLEANERS
1004 NV WAY BAKERY
100S RALPH'S AUTO BODY
1006 R t S AUTO BODY
100? ARTHUR KILL CORRECTIONAL INST.
1008 OPEN BURNING BEHIND JAIL
1009 GREAT KILLS LANDFILL
1010 PORT MOBIL TERMINAL
1011 IS 75
1012 LANDFILL STACKS
1013 POSH FRENCH CLEANERS
10U SHELL STATION
1015 SUKOCO STATION
Site Summary
NJ SIDE OF ARTHUR KILL
ARTHUR KILL ROAD
UOODROU RO t ROSSVILLE AVE
UOOOROW RD 1 ROSSVJLLE AVE
VETERANS RD WEST t ROSSVILLE
ARTHUR KILL ROAD NEAR JAIL
ARTHUR KILL ROAD
INDUSTRIAL LOOP ROAD EAST
ARTHUR KILL RD t EVERYWHERE
ARTHUR KILL ROAD
HUEGENOT i UOOOROW ROAD
UOODROU t ARTHUR KILL
ARTHUR KILL RD NEAR ARDEN HTS
1969 ARTHUR KILL & ARDEN RO
1781 ARTHUR KILL & ARDEN RD
Sandblasting t Smelter -- N. . N.A.
Gas Station -- N. . N.A.
Dry Cleaners SHS 0. 0 1.22
bakery -- «. . N.A.
Auto Refinlshing -- N. . N.A.
Auto Refinishing -- N. . N.A.
boiler -- N. . ' N.A.
open burning -• N. . N.A.
landfill -- N. . N.A.
tank farm SMS 0.00 S2.76
School Boiler -- N. . N.A.
landfill -- N. . H.A.
Dry Cleaners -- N. . N.A.
Gas Station SHS 0.00 9.55
Gas Station SMS 0.00 1.91
This site is almost exclust-ely residential with isolated commercial areas along Arthur Kill Road, woodrow Road and near the jail in Industrial Loop. The
landfill is also present in this area. It is the first area where we observed a large number of tall venting stacks coning off the landfill.
MAJOR SOURCES:
1010. Port Mobil Terminal - actually outside the imnediate 1km radius but still close enough to consider. It was by far the largest facility in the
area. Its emissions are 52.76 tons/year of gasoline.
MINOR SOURCES:
There were 14 minor sources that wer loacted during the microinventory. The breakdown is as follows:
- four gas stations
- two dry cleaners
- two auto refinishers
- the landfill and stacks are listed twice because of its omniprescence in the area.
- two bakeries
- two large boilers
- the remaining are: a sandblasting operation in Carteret, NJ and an incidence of open burning that we shut down on the spot.
-------
Figure III-5-15. Staten Island Mall miccoinventory
site.
A-168
-------
Table III-5-29. Major and minor sources identified at Statt.n island Mall microinventory site.
STATEN ISLAND MALL SITE (PUMPHOUSE)
No.
NAME
ADDRESS
TYPE
INVEN PH
VOC
1501 SUNOCO STATION (I ft II)
1502 NYC YUKON BUS DEPOT
1503 CORNICHE CLEANERS
1504 CAPRICE BAKERY
1505 FRENCH CLEANING BY CAROL
1506 LAUNDRY CENTER DRY CLEANING
1507 ANGELO'S GULF STATION
1508 PAUL MILLER DRY CLEANERS
1509 MOBIL STATION
1510 SUNNY HILL CLEANERS
1511 LANDFILL WITH STACKS
Site Summary
RICHMOND ft ROCKLAND AVE Gas Station
FOREST HILL AVE ft YUKON NYC Bus Depot
PERAGMENT MALL (MARSH&YUKON) Dry Cleaners
PERAGMENT MALL (MARSH&YUKON) bakery
PLATINUM ft MARSH Dry Cleaners
PAST PLATINUM ft FOREST HILL Dry Cleaners
2443 RICHMOND AVE & RICHMOND HI Gas Station
RICHMOND AVE PAST NOME AVE Dry Cleaners
2895 RICHMOND AVE & INDEPENDENCGas Station
RICHMOND HILL & RICHMOND AVE Dry Cleaners
EVERYWHERE landfill
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
N.A.
N.A.
0.00
N.A.
0.00
N.A.
0.00
N.A.
0.00
0.00
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
3.24
N.A.
'6.48
N.A.
2.04
N.A.
18
01
N.A.
This site is almost exclusively residential with an isolated commercial area up and down Richmond Avenue where the mall is.
in the area near the mall.
MAJOR SOURCES:
There were no major sources in the area.
MINOR SOURCES:
There were 11 minor sources that were located during the microinventory. the breakdown is as follows:
- three gas stations
- five dry cleaners
- the remaining are: the landfill & stacks, a bakery and a bus depot.
The landfill and stacks were present
-------
Figure III-5-L6. E.ltingviUe (Annadale), NY,
microinventory site.
A-170
-------
Table III-5-30. Major and minor sources identified at Eltingvi.lle microinventory site.
ELTINGVILLE SITE (ANN AD ALE). STATEN (SUM)
HO. KANE
1101 LANDFILL WITW STACKS
1102 PAUL MILLER DRY CLEANERS
1103 MERCURY CLEANERS
1104 SUNOCO STATION
1105 PS 42
ADDRESS
EVERYWHERE
RICHMOND AVE I ARTHUR KILL
ARTHUR KILL 1 CORTELYOU
630 ARTHUR KILL t ARMSTRONG
GENESSEE t, RICHMOND
TYPE
landfill
Dry Cleaners
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
School Boiler
INVEtt PM
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
SMS 0.00
N.A.
VOC
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
1.74
N.A.
Site Summary
Thst site is exclusively residential with isolated small sources spread throughout the area. The landfill and stacks were also present in the northeast part of
the study area.
T
»L MAJOR SOURCES:
2 NONE
MINOR SOURCES:
There were five minor sources that were located during the microinventory. The breakdown 1s as follows:
- one gas rtat ion
' two dry cleaners
• the remaining are: the landfill t stacks, and a schoot boiler.
-------
Figure III-5-17. Susan Wagner (Westerleigh), NY,
microinventory site.
A-172
-------
Table III-5-31- Major and minor sources identified at Susan Wagner microinventory site,
SUSAH WAGNER SITE. STATEH ISLAND
No.
KANE
ADDRESS
TYPE
INVEN PH
VOC
1601 SEA VIEW HOSPITAL
1602 1NST. FOR BASIC RESEARCH
1603 PETER'S DRY CLEANERS
1604 FAMOUS KOSHER BAKERY
1605 AMOCO STATION
1606 SUNOCO STATION
1607 VICTORY CLEANERS
1608 CITGO STATION
1609 FRIENDLY DRV CLEANERS
1610 GETTY STATION
1611 BOERUM AUTO SERVICE (MOBIL)
1612 PURR-FECT CLEANERS
1613 P.S. 29
1614 TEXACO STATION
1615 SWAN CLEANERS
1616 8RADELV CLEANERS
1617 P.S.54
Site Summary
BRIELLE AVE boiler
FOREST HILL ft UILLOWBROOK' boiler
VICTORY I CARMEL Dry Cleaner
VICTORY t CARMEL Bakery
2071 VICTORY BLVD GAS STATION
2052 VICTORY BLVD GAS STATION
VICTORY I JEUIT DRY CLEANERS
2071 VICTORY BLVD GAS STATION
VICTORY I CLERMONT DRY CLEANERS
VICTORY t SOUTH GREELEAF AVE. GAS STATION
1774 VICTORY BLVD GAS STATION
VICTORY A UINTHROP PLACE DRY CLEANERS
SLOSSON AVE. & VICTORY SCHOOL BOILER
MANOR RD C OCEAN TERRACE GAS STATION
MANOR RD & SCHMIDT LANE DRY CLEANERS
HOLDEN BLVD t UILLOUBROOK DRY CLEANERS
UILLOWBROOK & SHERADEN AVE. SCHOOL BOILER
SMS
SMS
SHS
This site is very residential with tuo major commercial areas along Hylan Blvd. and Richmond Avenue.
MAJOR SOURCES:
There were no major sources in the area.
MINOR SOURCES:
There were 27 minor sources that were located during the microinventory. The breakdown is as follows:
- 14 gas stations
- 11 dry cleaners
- two school boilers
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
0.00
0.00
N.A.
0.00
N.A.
N.A.
tt.A.
N.
N
N.
N.
N.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
3.36
.1.32
N.A.
14.07
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
-------
pigure III-5-18. Dongan Hills, NY, microinventory site
A-174
-------
Table III-5-32. Major and minor sources identified at Dongan Hills microinventory site,
DONGAN HILLS SITE, SUTEN ISLAND
No.
NAME
ADDRESS
TYPE
INVEM
PM
VOC
T
Ln
701 GETTT STATION
702 IMPERIAL CLEANERS
703 E ft H MOBILE STATION
70* IS 2
705 OCTANE PLUS
706 CITGO STATION
707 BOULEVARD CLEANERS
708 REVERE CLEANERS
709 BP STATION
710 AMOCO STATION
711 MERCURY CLEANERS
712 GETTY STATION
713 GULF STATION
7U TOOT HILL CLEANERS
715 SEAVER CLEANERS t FRENCH TAILORS
716 EAGLE GAS
717 CASETERIA
718 SUNOCO STATION
719 R S J SERVICE STATION
720 VINCENT*S FRENCH CLEAVERS
721 PS 11
722 MICHAEL'S CLEANERS
723 ONE-STOP CLEANERS
724 MOBIL OIL CORP.
725 NORA'S CLEANERS
726 REVERE CLEANERS
727 BP STATION
1201 VICYDRY BLVD.
RICHMOND t JEFFERSON AVE.
2150 HYLAN BLVD
BOUNDARY t MIDLAND
HYLAN I JEFFERSON
HYLAN t SLATER AVE.
HYLAN I NAUGHTM AVE.
HYLAN t GARRETSON AVE.
HYLAN t ALTER AVE.
1581 HYLAN BLVD.
1501 HYLAN BLVD.
HYLAN I COOPER AV.
HYLAN I REID AV.
HYLAN t OLD TOWN RD.
HYLAN t SEAVER AVE.
HYLAN I HAMDEM AVE.
HYLAN I HAHDEH AVE.
2200 HYLAN BLVD.
HYLAN I LINCOLN AVE.
LINCLOM AVE.
JEFFERSON I GARRETSON AVE.
RICHMOND t SEAVIEW AVE.
RICHMOND C SEAVIEW AVE.
1680 RICHMOND AVE.
RICHMOND C BUEL AVE.
HYLAN t GARRETSON AVE.
RICHMOND t DELVOCD AVE.
GAS STATION
DRY CLEANERS
GAS STATION
SCHOOL BOILER
GAS STATION
GAS STATION
DRY CLEANERS
DRY CLEANERS
GAS STATION
GAS STATION
DRY CLEANERS
GAS STATION
GAS STATION
DRY CLEANERS
DRY CLEANERS
GAS STATION
GAS STATION
GAS STATION
GAS STATIONS
DRY CLEANERS
SCHOOL BOILER
DRY CLEAKERS
DRY CLEANERS
GAS STATION
DRY CLEANERS
DRY CLEANERS
GAS STATION
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
Site Sunmarv
This site it very residential with two major commercial areas along Hylan Blvd. and Richmond Avenue.
MAJOR SOURCES:
There were no major sources in the area.
MINOR SOURCES:
There were 27 minor sources that were located during the microinventory. The breakdown is as follows:
- U gas stations
- 11 dry cleaners
- tuo school boilers
0.00
N.A.
0.00
M.A.
N.A.
N.A.
0.00
N.A.
N.A.
0.00
0.00
N.A.
M.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
0.00
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
• N.A.
N.A.
0.00
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
1.39
N.A.
7.46
tt.A.
N.A.
N.A.
3.24
N.A.
N.A.
3.15
4.86
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
3.60
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
N.A.
2.05
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
-------
Figure III-5-19. Clifton (Bayley Seton Hospital)/ NY,
microinventory site.
A-176
-------
Table III-5-33. Major and minor sources identified at Clifton microinventory site
CLIFTON SITE, STATED ISLAND
Ho.
NAHE
ADDRESS
TTPE
1HVEH P*
VOC
801 BAILEY SETOH HOSPITAL
802 PREFERRED AUTO BOOT
803 SUN CHEMICAL CORP.
804 DIAMOND PAVEMENT CORP.
805 K t 0 OUT CLEANING
806 GETTT STATION
807 SHORE ACRES CLEANERS
808 APT. BUILDING INCINERATOR
809 BAY VIEW DRY CLEANERS
810 SWEETCAKES BAKERY
811 HERIT STATION
812 JONNY'S AUTOBOOY SHOP
813 A-1 AUTO STYLING
8K BAY STREET BAKERY
815 3-STAB GAS STATION
816 ANG1ULI DODGE COSTUH BODY SHOP
817 MERCURY CLEANERS
818 DEMA'S AUTOBODY
819 DACCY COLCISIOM
820 T t T TUFF TIKES COLLISION
821 VALET SERVICES CLEANERS
822 GULF STATION
823 HOB1L STATION
824 TECH PRODUCTS INC.
625 SCORE STATION
826 EAGLE STATION
827 MERCURY CLEANS*S
828 TEXACO STATION (RAHDMO
829 PS U
830 CLEAN HACK!HE CLEANERS
831 GALATHO'S DRY CLEANERS
832 HACKAUER AU1OBOOT
833 RE-NU-IT AUTOBOOY
834 TIME GAS t SERVICE
835 AUER'S BAKERY
836 WAGNER'S COLLISION
637 GETTY STATION
838 CERTIFIED GAS STATION
839 MERCURY CLEANERS
640 MOBli STATION (SUNNYSIOE SS)
841 GETTY STATION
842 CITGO STATION (FORMER TEXACO)
843 CITGO STATION
644 GULF STATION
845 U-BEND-IT-UE-MEND-IT
646 PAUL MILLER DRY CLEANERS
847 AiB AUTO BODY
TOMPKIHS t VANDERBILT AVE.
LYNHURST t TONPKtNS AVE.
441 TOMPKINS AVE.
118 GREENFIELD AVE.
CLIFTON t TOMPKINS AVE.
BAY & FINGERBOARD
BAY I CLIFF AVE.
CLIFF AVE.
BAY ft CLIFTON AVE.
BAY t CLIFTON AVE.
951 BAY STREET
36 CANAL ST.
38 CAHAL ST
BAY DOCK
HANNAH
BAY TREE!
BAY
BAY
GRANT
GRANT
BAIT C STREET
BAY UILL1AMS ST.
BAY UILLIAMS ST.
BAY WAVE ST.
830 BAY ST.
105 UILLOU AVE.
BAY t CHESTNUT ST.
TARGEE t VANDERBILT
TARGEE & VANDERBILT
TARGEE t VANDERBILT
HALL ST. t TOMPKINS
BROAD I TOMPKINS
BROAD I CEDAR ST.
BROAD t TOMPKINS
CANAL ST.
VANDERBILT I ELINGTON
STEUBEN t VANDERBILT
PIERCE 1 VANDEAB1LT
NARROWS RD i VAHDERBILT
DEKALB RD t TARGEE
CLOVE t GENNESSEE
1262 CLOVE & VICTORY
1201 VICTORY t CLOVE
VICTORY BLVD PAST HIGHLAND
VICTORY BLVD I CEBRA AVE
VICTORY BLVD I BROOK ST
VICTORY BLVD ft BROOK ST
VICTORY BLVD t BROOK ST
65 t 67 HANNAH ST
Hospital Boiler
Auto Refinishing
Pigments
Cement Plant
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
Dry Cleaners
APT. Incinerator
Dry Cleaners
Bakery
Gas Station
Auto Relinishing
Auto Refinishtng
Bakery
Cas Station
Auto Refinishing
Dry Cleaners
Auto Refinishtng
Auto Refinishtng
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Gas Station
Gas Station
Printer
Gas Station
Gas Station
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
School Boiler
Dry Cleaners
Dry Cleaners
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Gas Station
Bakery
Auto Refinishing
Gas Station
Gas Station
Dry Cleaners
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Gas Station
Auto Refinishing
Dry Cleaners
Auto Refinishtng
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
SMS
N.A.
N.A.
0.00
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
0.00
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
0.00
0.00
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
0.00
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
0.00
0.00
0.00
N.A.
N.A.
K.A.
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
0.90
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
H.A.
N.A.
.10.41
N.A.
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
1.36
5.34
H.A.
H.A.
N.A.
1.12
H.A.
N.A.
H.A.
N.A.
H.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
H.A.
N.A.
H.A.
1.45
1.39
0.42
H.A.
N.A.
H.A.
H.A.
N.A.
-------
Table III-5-23 . (continued) Clifton, NY
oo
848 JOHN AND ANDY'S AUTO BODY
849 STATEN ISLAND AUTO BODY
850 CHARLY FRENCH CLEANERS
851 HARINELLI'S AUTO BODY
Site Summary
VAN DUZER AND SWAN ST.
148 BEACH ST. & JACKSON
VICTORY BLVD & CEBRA AVE
VAN DUZER & BROAD
Auto Refinishing
Auto Refinishing
Dry Cleaners
Auto Refinishing
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
This site is a mix of industrial an residential areas, the area along the waterfront is almost entirely commercial. In fact, it is the area where the naval
base homeport is being constructed. There is a facility under construction there that has approximately fifty to seventy stacks on its roof. The ferry terminal
is located in this area and there are major shopping areas along Bay Street. Victory Blvd. and Vanderbilt Ave. This site had the second highest number of
sources in Staten Island (only Port Richmond had more).
MAJOR SOURCES:
There were no major sources in the area.
MINOR SOURCES:
There were 51 minor sources that were located during the microinventory. The breakdown is as follows:
- 16 gas stations
- 10 dry cleaners
- 16 auto refinishers
- three bakeries
- the remaining are: two boilers (school & hospital), one apartment incinerator, one pigment plant, one cement plant, and a print shop.
-------
Emissions MapppincfMaps and Tables
A-179
-------
Figure III-5-20
STATEIM ISLAND PROJECT MAPPING SYSTEM
BENZENE POINT SOURCES
4.53
I AMERADA HESS CORP
2 NEWPORT CITY DEVELOP
3 HULS AMERICA. INC
SPENCER KCLLOGO PROD
6 CHEVRON CHEMICAL COH
HERCULES INCORPORATE
7 MERCK ft CO
8 BLOCK DRUG COMPANY.
> ORBIS PRODUCTS CORPO
10 AKZO CHEMICALS INC
IV MARISOl INC CHEM D
12 TROY CHEMICAL CORPOI
13. EXXON BAYWAY REFINE!
14. SHELL OIL COMPANY
16. CHEVRON USA INC.
18 GENERAL MOTORS CORP
17 FORD MOTOR CO
IB GATX TERMINALS CORP
19 TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH Ol
. CITY OF NEW BRUNSW1C
21 TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRI
22. BOROJGH OF CARTEHET
NNE POTV
24 OLD BRIDGE POTW
26 SOMERSET HARHAN VAI
28 TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY
27 CITY OF HOBOKEN POTV
28 LINPRO COMPANY POTVl
28 CITY OF ORANGE DPW P
30 RAHWAY VALLEY SA PO
31 MIDDLESEX COUNTY PO
32 JAMESBURG SCHOOL FO
33 CITY OF LINDEN POTW
34 OLD BRIDGE MUA BROW
36 BOROUGH OF SAYREVILL
38 SOUTH AMBOY POTW
540
550
560
570
580
590
600
610
62O
37 LINDEN ROSELLE POTW
38. BOROUGH OF SAYREVILL
3> TOWN OF KEARNY POTW
40. CITY OF ELIZABETH PO
4 1 TOWN OF LIVINGSTON P
42 JOINT MEETING OF ESS
43 MIDDLESEX COUNTY POT
44 CITY OF PERTH AMBOY
46 TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRID
48 WESTGATE TWO DEVELOP
47 KIN BUG. INC. (LAND
48. SHELL OIL COMPANY
48 GETTY PETROLEUM CORP
60. PERK CHEMICAL CO., I
61. SOLVENTS RECOVERY SE
62 AMERICAN HOME PRODUC
63. RED HOOK POTW
utm-eastlng
-------
Table 111-5-34; Benzene point sources on bubble map Figure 111-5-20
FACILITY NAME
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
AMERADA HESS CORP
NEWPORT CITY DEVELOPMENT CO
HULS AMERICA, INC.
SPENCER KELLOGG PRODUCTS
CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY
HERCULES INCORPORATED
MERCK & CO
BLOCK DRUG COMPANY, INC.
ORBIS PRODUCTS CORPORATION
AK20 CHEMICALS INC.
MAR ISOL INC. CHEM. DIV.
TROY CHEMICAL CORPORATION
EXXON BAYUAY REFINERY
SHELL OIL COMPANY
CHEVRON USA INC.
GENERAL MOTORS CORP. CPC GROUP
FORD MOTOR CO
GATX TERMINALS CORP.
TOWNSHIP OF SOUTH ORANGE
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK POTW
TOWNSHIP OF WOOOBRIDGE POTW 2
BOROUGH OF CARTERET POIW
CITY OF BAYONNE POTW
OLD BRIDGE POTW
SOMERSET-RARITAN VALLEY POTW
TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY HGHTS WPC POTW
CITY OF HOBOKEN POTW
LINPRO COMPANY POTW, THE
CITY OF ORANGE DPW POTW
RAHWAY VALLEY SA POTW
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTW
JAMESBURG SCHOOL FOR BOYS POTW
CITY OF LINDEN POTW
OLD BRIDGE HUA BROWNTOWN POTW
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTW 2
SOUTH AMBOY POTW
LINDEN ROSELLE POTW
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTW 1
TOWN OF KEARNY POTW
CITY OF ELIZABETH POTW
STREET ADDRESS
750 CLIFF RD
145 12TH STREET
830 MAGNOLIA AVENUE
400 DOREHUS AVE
SUMMIT AVENUE
HIUISINK & CHEESEQUAKE RD
126 EAST LINCOLN AVE
257 CORNELI SON AVE
55 VIRGINIA STREET
MEADOW ROAD
125 FACTORY LANE
ONE AVENUE L
1400 PARK AVE
111 STATE STREET
1200 STATE STREET
1016 WEST EDGAR RD
939 US ROUTE #1
78 LAFAYETTE STREET
WALTON AVE. PUMPING STA.
1 MAIN STREET
399 ROOSEVELT AVE
630 AVE C
OLD WATER WORKS ROAD
POLHEMUS AVE
94 WASHINGTON STREET
1050 EAST HAZELWOOO AVE
1 CHEVALIER AVE
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
39 CENTRAL AVE
CITY
PORT READING
JERSEY CITY
ELIZABETH
NEWARK
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
SAYREVILLE
RAHWAY
JERSEY CITY
NEWARK
EDISON
MIDDLESEX
NEWARK
LINDEN
SEWAREN
PERTH AMBOY
LINDEN
EDISON
CARTERET
SOUTH ORAMGE
NEW BRUNSWICK
UOOOBR10GE
CARTERET
BAYONNE
OLD BRIDGE
BRIDGEWATER
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
HOBOKEN
ORANGE
RAHWAY
SAYREVILLE
LINDEN
SOUTH AMBOY
LINDEN
KEARNY
ELIZABETH
ZIP
CODE
07064
07372
07201
07105
07922
08872
07065
07302
07114
08817
08846
07105
07036
07077
08861
07036
08818
07008
07079
08903
07095
07008
07002
08857
08807
07922
07030
07051
07065
08872
07036
08879
07036
07032
07207
UTH-H
4490.0
4508.9
4501.8
4507.5
4504.0
4477.5
4495.7
4467.0
4504.2
4482.1
4489.9
4507.3
4497.9
4487.8
4488.5
4496.2
4485.2
4492.7
4510.0
4482.9
4484.6
4491 .6
4499.7
4478.6
4489.0
4503.4
4511.5
4464.0
4510.8
4492.8
4481 .0
4465.0
4505.3
4472.0
4480.5
4481.0
4495.0
4479.3
4507.2
4503.1
UTK-E
564.0
581.3
567.3
573.8
547.0
555.6
562.4
543.0
567.1
552.2
540.9
570.1
567.4
562.8
561.9
562.8
553.2
566.7
561.6
543.8
558.9
566.7
574.8
564.9
536.6
546.6
583.0
533.1
563.3
566.9
563.3
552.0
563.4
558.8
560.0
560.0
567.1
563.1
574.9
568.3
FACILITY-WIDE
EMISSIONS
(tons/yr)
2.90
0.11
5.09
1.10
0.68
0.88
21.60
0.28
13.14
1.53
0.03
1.31
25.00
1.50
0.30
0.25
0.25
0.05
0.02
0.16
0.01
0.03
0.14
0.04
0.11
0.49
0.18
0.18
0.06
0.28
0.69
0.04
0.10
0.09
0.03
0.27
5.13
0.06
0.05
0.21
-------
Table 111-5-34. continued: Benzene point sources on bubble map figure 111-5-20
fACUITY MAKE
STREET ADDRESS
CITY
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
TOWN OF LIVINGSTON POTW
JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX-UNION POTW
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTW 2
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POTU
TOWNSHIP OF UOOOBR1DGE POTU 1
WESTGATE TWO DEVELOPERS INC (LANDFILL)
KIH-BVC, INC. (LANDFILL)
SHELL OIL COMPANY
GETTY PETROLEUM CORP.
PERK CHEHICAL CO., INC.
SOLVENTS RECOVERY SERVICE
AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP.
RED HOOK POTU
500 SOUTH FIRST STREET
260 HIGH STREET
CLIFF ROAD
RAHWAY ROAD
MEADOW ROAD
1300 ROUTE 27
ROUTE 36 4 AVENUE D
567 RIDGE ROAO
MARSHALL ST/LITTLE ST
LIVINGSTON
ELIZABETH
PERTH AMBOY
SEWAREN
EDISON
EDISON
NORTH BRUNSWICK
ATLANTIC HIGHLANDS
ELIZABETH
LINDEN
HONMOUTH JCT.
BROOKLYN
ZIP
COPE
07039
07202
08861
07077
08818
08817
08902
07716
07207
07036
08852
UTH-H
4517.7
4498.4
4483.0
4483.1
4489.2
4494.0
4481.2
4480.7
4468.0
4499.8
4496.0
4468.8
4506.4
UTM-E
555.6
567.8
550.8
561.1
563.5
552.7
552.5
543.8
582.0
566.5
563.1
536.1
586.3
FACILITY-WIDE
EMISSIONS
(tons/vr)
0.03
18.28
2.13
0.05
0.03
0.20
0.02
0.09
0.26
0.03
0.19
0.04
0.31
00
K)
-------
Figure IIT-5-21
STATEN ISLAND PROJECT MAPPING SYSTEM
BENZENE AREA & MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION DENSITIES
oc
Ul
O)
O
c
I
+-•
D
4.531
4.S2
4,51
4.5CK
4.49 -
4.48
4,47 ~
TONS/YR
Staten Island
note: NY & NJ mobile source emissions are population based.
540 550
560
570
580
590
810
620
utm-easting
-------
Figure III- 5-22
STATEN ISLAND PROJECT MAPPING SYSTEM
BENZENE AREA & MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION DENSITIES
O)
o
c
I
*-•
D
4.53
4.52
4.81
4.KM
4,4*4
4,4I(
4,47i
•missions are
note: NY mobile source
NJ mobile source emissions
TONS/YR
D > 0- < 5
H 5 - < 10
• 10- < 15
• 15 - < 20
• 20 - < 30
• > 30
VMT based,
are population based
540 550 560 570 580 590 . 6OO 610 620
utm-easting
-------
Table 111-5-35:
Benzene area and mobile source air toxics emissions in Staten Island, tons/year-
comparison of New York and Neu Jersey methods for estimating these emissions uhich are depicted in
emission density maps Figures III-5-21 and 22
T
I—'
oo
in
utm-n
4,483
4.485
4,487
4.489
4,483
4,485
4.487
4,489
4,483
4.485
4,487
4.489
4.491
4,493
4.495
4,497
4.499
4.485
4,487
4,489
4,491
4.493
4,495
4,497
4,499
4,487
4,489
4,491
4,493
4,495
4,497
4,499
4,487
4,489
VOC
1986 Avg: VMT/Grid 29.732
POPULATION 1000 Mi/Tear TONS/DAY
ut»-e
563
563
563
563
565
565
565
565
567
567
567
567
567
567
567
567
567
569
569
569
569
569
569
569
569
571
571
571
571
571
571
571
573
573
374,000*
725
1,909
0
0
1,331
3,519
1,327
797
26
1,790
6,711
2,044
0
0
0
0
0
1,365
6,840
15,787
1,468
5,291
756
70
247
10,466
20,514
4.730
7,399
9,935
12,967
6,740
1.554
13,081
2,340,886*
13,591
13,788
0
0
2,172
30,489
95,041
24,240
0
22,247
77,727
85,525
18,003
4,427
0
0
0
7,881
59,602
60,089
27,725
65,375
101,490
99,187
46,890
35,291
38,648
25,048
22,638
72,497
92,156
13,455
8,671
26,803
59,4647
345
350
0
0
55
774
2.414
616
0
565
1.974
2.173
457
112
0
0
0
200
1.514
1,526
704
1,661
2.578
2,520
1,191
896
982
636
575
1,842
2,341
342
220
681
A* B
EXHAUST1 EVAPORATIVE2 SUBT EPA GAS
0.131 1.79% NY STATION
Gm/Mile VOC MOBILE IBS/DAY
(LB/DAY)
10.75
10.91
0.00
0.00
1.72
24.12
75.20
19.18
0.00
17.60
61.50
67.67
14.24
3.50
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.24
47.16
47.55
21.94
51.73
80.30
78.48
37.10
27.92
30.58
19.82
17.91
57.36
72.92
10.65
6.86
21.21
6.18
6.27
0.00
0.00
0.99
13.86
43.22
11.02
0.00
10.12
35.34
38.89
8.19
2.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.58
27.10
27.32
12.61
29.73
46.15
45.10
21.32
16.05
17.57
11.39
10.29
32.96
41.90
6.12
3.94
12.19
16.93
17.18
0.00
0.00
2.71
37.99
118.42
30.20
0.00
27.72
96.84
106.56
22.43
5.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
9.82
74.26
74.87
34.54
81.45
126.45
123.58
58.42
43.97
48.15
31.21
28.21
90.33
114.82
16.76
10.80
33.40
0.13
0.34
0.00
0.00
0.24
0.63
0.24
0.14
0.00
0.32
1.20
0.37
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.24
1.22
2.82
0.26
0.95
0.14
0.01
0.04
1.87
3.67
0.85
1.32
1.78
2.32
1.20
0.28
2.34
NY3
TOTAL
TONS/YR
3.13
3.23
0.00
0.00
0.56
7.10
21.67
5.55
0.00
5.14
18.00
19.55
4.09
1.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.86
13.88
14.42
6.37
15.12
23.11
22.56
10.67
8.53
9.78
5.92
5.50
16.96
21.58
3.38
2.05
6.72
C 0 E
NJGAS NJ COLO HJMOBILE TOTAL
DECREASE METHOD
LB/DAY (LB/DAY)
0.16
0.42
0.00
0.00
0.30
0.78
0.29
0.18
0.01
0.40
1.49
0.45
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.30
1.52
3.50
0.33
1.17
0.17
0.02
0.05
2.32
4.55
1.05
1.64
2.20
2.88
1.50
0.34
2.90
0.06
0.16
0.00
0.00
0.11
0.30
0.11
0.07
0.00
0.15
0.57
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.12
0.58
1.34
0.12
0.45
0.06
0.01
0.02
0.89
1.74
0.40
0.63
0.84
1.10
0.57
0.13
1.11
3.57
9.41
0.00
0.00
6.56
17.34
6.54
3.93
0.13
8.82
33.08
10.07
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6.73
33.71
77.81
7.24
26.08
3.73
0.35
1.22
51.58
101.11
23.31
36.47
48.97
63.91
33.22
7.66
64.47
3.80
9.99
0.00
0.00
6.97
18.42
6.95
4.17
0.14
9.37
35.14
10.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
7.15
35.81
82.65
7.69
27.70
3.96
0.37
1.29
54.80
107.40
24.76
38.74
52.02
67.89
35.29
8.14
68.49
NJ4 OtfF
TOTAL ttt-ttf
TONS/YR TQNS/T*
0.69
1.82
0.00
0.00
1.27
3.36
1.27
0.76
0.02
1.71
6.41
1.95
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.30
6.54
15.08
1.40
5.06
0.72
0.07
0.24
10.00
19.60
4.52
7.07
9.49
12.39
6.44
1.48
12.50
2
1
0
0
-1
4
20
5
0
3
12
18
4
. 1
0
0
0
1
7
-1
5
10
22
22
10
•1
-10
1
*2.
1
9
-X
"1
-6
-------
labVe \\\-V3S. c«\t\rued: Benzene area and mobUe source a\r toxics emissions in Staten Island, tons/year-
comparison of New York and Mew Jersey methods for estimating these emissions which are depicted in
emission density maps Figures 111-5-21 and 22
r
utm-n
4.491
4,493
4,495
4,497
4,499
4,489
4,491
4,493
4.495
4,497
4,499
4,491
4,493
4,495
4.497
4,499
4,493
4,495
4,497
4,499
utm-e
573
573
573
573
573
575
575
575
575
575
575
577
577
577
577
577
579
579
579
579
1986 K\
>OPULATION
374.000s
12,585
4,389
18,537
19.887
8.531
5.725
15.564
6,711
12.893
13,217
12,566
6.982
14.812
15,557
18,426
26.126
4.935
11,904
5,264
0
/g: VMT/Grid
000 Mi /Year
2,340,886"
20,179
84,091
114.829
79.848
81,389
14,988
68,404
7,680
63,294
40.963
41,479
16,732
83,920
73,761
90,674
62,615
11.246
156,893
31.720
5,486
VOC
29.732
TONS/DAI
59,4647
513
2.136
2,917
2.028
2.067
381
1.738
195
1.608
1,041
1,054
425
2,132
1,874
2.303
1.591
286
3,985
806
139
EXHAUST1
0.131
< On/Nile
15.97
66.54
90.86
63.18
64.40
11.86
54.12
6.08
50.08
32.41
32.82
13.24
66.40
58.36
71.75
49.54
8.90
124.14
25.10
4.34
1.852
LB/DAY
EVAPORATIVE
1.79X
VOC
9.18
38.24
52.21
36.31
37.01
6.82
31.10
3.49
28.78
18.63
18.86
7.61
38.16
33.54
41.23
28.47
5.11
71.34
14.42
2.49
1.065
LB/DAY
, *
2 SUBT
NY
MOBILE
(LB/OAY)
25.14
104.77
143.07
99.49
101.41
18.67
85.23
9.57
78.86
51.04
51.68
20.85
104.56
91.90
112.98
78.02
14.01
195.48
39.52
6.84
2,917
LB/OAY
B
EPA GAS
STATION
LBS/DAY
2.25
0.78
3.31
3.55
1.52
1.02
2.78
1.20
2.30
2.36
2.25
1.25
2.65
2.78
3.29
4.67
0.88
2.13
0.94
0.00
67
LB/DAY
NY3
TOTAL
TONS/YR
5.19
19.33
27.00
19.11
18.92
3.68
16.30
2.07
15.01
9.95
10.04
4.14
19.80
17.52
21.50
15.50
2.79
36.25
7.47
1.25
550
TPY
C
NJGAS N
2.79
0.97
4.11
4.41
1.89
1.27
3.45
1.49
2.86
2.93
2.79
1.55
3.29
3.45
4.09
5.80
1.10
2.64
1.17
0.00
83
LB/OAY
D
J COLD N
DECREASE
1.07
0.37
1.57
1.69
0.72
0.49
1.32
0.57
.10
.12
.07
0.59
.26
.32
.56
2.22
0.42
1.01
0.45
0.00
32
LB/DAY
E
J MOBILE
METHOD
LB/DAY
62.03
21.63
91.36
98.02
42.05
28.22
76.71
33.08
63.55
65.14
61.93
34.41
73.00
76.68
90.82
128.77
24.32
58.67
25.95
0.00
1,843
LB/DAY
TOTAL
(LB/DAY)
65.89
22.98
97.05
104.12
44.67
29.97
81.49
35.14
67.50
69.20
65.79
36.56
77.55
81.45
96.47
136.79
25.84
62.32
27.56
0.00
1,958
LB/DAY
NJ4
TOTAL
TONS/YR
12.02
4.19
17.71
19.00
8.15
5.47
14.87
6.41
12.32
12.63
12.01
6.67
14.15
14.86
17.61
24.96
4.72
11.37
5.03
0.00
357
TPY
X diff
OIFF
HY-MJ
TONS/YR
-7
15
9
0
11
•t
\
-4
3
-3
•2
*3
6
3
4
-9
-2
25
£
\
193
35, IX
* Column A is the subtotal for exhaust plus evaporative emissions estimates by NYSOEC.
1 Exhaust emissions in Ibs/day using emission factor from U.S. EPA, 1985b.
2 Evaporative emissions in Ibs/day using emission factor from Carhart and Walsh, 1987.
3 "NY TOTAL" means the sum of columns A (SUBT NY). B (EPA GAS STATION), and D (NJ COLD DECREASE) in tons per year.
4 "NJ TOTAL" means the sum of colums C (NJGAS), D (NJ COLD DECREASE), and E (NJMOBILE) in tons per year.
* Countywide population from USOOC, 1986.
6 Countywide VHT from NYSDEC.
7 Countywide total VOC in Ibs/day from Butensky, 1990.
-------
>
—
oc
0)
t
o
C
I
•M
4.53<
4.52<
4,511
4.501
4.49
4,48
4.47
Figure III-5-23
STATEN ISLAND PROJECT MAPPING SYSTEM
CADMIUM POINT SOURCES
1. PIASTICS COLOR CHIP
J. INTERNATIONA!. FLAVOR
1. GENERAL COLOR CO. IN
. AK2O CHEMICALS INC.
PREMIUM PLASTICS, IN
RARITAN RIVER SIEEL
PHOLERIZED SCHIABO N
. MET! METALLURGICAL C
. OKONITE COMPANY. THE
10. FRANKLIN PIASTICS
11. ARGUS DIVISION
540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620
utm-easting
-------
\\\-VM>x tad»\v» and c«k\u» compound po\nt sources on butibVe map f iaure \\l-S-23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
NAME
PLASTICS COLOR CHIP INC
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES
GENERAL COLOR CO. INC.
AKZO CHEMICALS INC.
PREMIUM PLASTICS, INC.
RARITAN RIVER STEEL COMPANY
PROLERIZED SCHIABO NEU COMPANY
METZ METALLURGICAL CORP.
OKONITE COMPANY, THE
FRANKLIN PLASTICS
ARGUS DIVISION
STREET ADDRESS
2 CAMPUS COURT
800 ROSE LANE
24 AVENUE B
500 JERSEY AVENUE
300 RYDERS LANE
MARKET AND ELM STREETS
FOOT OF LINDEN AVENUE
3900 S. CLINTON AVE.
US ROUTE 1
113 PASSAIC AVE
633 COURT STREET
CITY
SOMERSET
UNION BEACH
NEWARK
NEU BRUNSWICK
EAST BRUNSWICK
PERTH AMBOY
JERSEY CITY
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
NORTH BRUNSWICK
KEARNY
BROOKLYN
ZIP
CODE
08875
07735
071 U
08903
08816
08861
07303
07080
08902
07032
11231
UTM-N
4483.4
4477.0
4505.4
4480.9
4475.5
4484.3
4504.4
4484.5
4477.9
4511.8
4502.7
UTM-E
542.2
571.8
570.5
545.1
548.9
561.0
577.3
548.4
543.6
590.7
584.4
FACILITY-WIDE
EMISSIONS
(tons/yr)
0.25
0.18
0.50
0.13
0.01
0.01
0.50
0.38
0.02
0.25
3.33
00
oo
-------
Figure III-5-24
STATEN ISLAND PROJECT MAPPING SYSTEM
CADMIUM AREA & MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION DENSITIES
—
2
O)
t
o
4.53
4.52
4.5K
4.50
4,491
4.481
4.474
TONS/YR
540
550 560
57O
580 590 60O 61O
620
utm-easting
-------
Figure III-5-25
STATEN ISLAND PROJECT MAPPING SYSTEM
METHYLENE CHLORIDE (DICHLOROMETHANE) POINT SOURCES
T
H-
i
O)
c
ti
O
I
4->
4,53
4.52
4.51
4,501
4.491
4.48<
4.471
I. TETLEY INC
l.LCf CHEMICALS • NE
1. POI BUSINESS UNIT OF
RONA PEARL
6 INTERNATIONA! FLAVOR
a CPS CHEMICAL CORP. I
7 WILSON IMPERIAL. CO
» CHEVRON CHEMICAL CO*
». UNION CARBIDE CORP B
10. BEECHAM LABORATORIE
H.MERCK 4 CO
I 2 NUTRO LABORATORIES I
13. ER SQUIBB t SONS
14. CIBA GEIGY CORP
16. PRIVATE FORMUtATION:
16 SCHERINQ CORP
17. ECOIAB. INC.
18. OAKITE PRODUCTS INC
It. ALLIED SIGNAL INC.
O. VALSPAR COR?
11 NEW YORK BRONZE POVN
22 AKZO CHEMICALS INC
. •
E CORPORA
24. MARISOL INC. CMEM D
26 MOHAWK LABORATORIE
26 MON ECO INDUSTRIES I
27 ESSEX SPECIALTY PROD
28 OELEET MERCHANDISING
29 EXXON BAYWAY REFINEI
30. BANKS BROTHERS INC.
31 KERN FOAM PRODUCTS
32 DRIVER HARRIS ALLOYS
33 CROWN METAL FINISHIN
34 NEWARK INDUSTRIAL SF
36 EASTERN STEEL BARREL
38 A C COMPACTING PRESS
o : o
'O IIRTHAMlflYO
^Middlesex
560 570
580 590
540
550
utm-easting
. FORD MOTOR CO
. GENERAL MOTORS CORP
. JOHNSON 4 JOHNSON CO
. i I DUPONT DE NEMOUR
. Bf LL TELEPHONE LABOR
. TOWN OF LIVINGSTON P
. OLD BRIDGE MUA BROWN
. TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY
. SOMERSET-RAHITAN VAL
. TOWNSHIP OF WOODBHID
. TOWNSHIP OF WOODBHID
. TOWN OF KEARNY POTW
. BOROUGH OF SAVREV1LL
. MIDDLESEX COUNTY POT
BOROUGH OF SAYREVUL
CITY OF BAYONNE POTW
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWIC
JOINT MEETING OF ESS
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY
CITY OF LINDEN POTW
BOROUGH OF CARTEHET
OLD BRIDGE POTW
LINPRO COMPANY POTW,
RAHWAY VALLEY SA POT
LINDEN ROSELLE POTW
JAMESBURG SCHOOL FOR
SOUTH AMBOY POTW
CITY OF HOBOKEN POTW
CITY OF ORANGE DPW P
CITY OF ELIZABETH PO
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POT
KIN BUC. INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF
AMERICAN HOME PROOUC
FMC CORPORATION
INDUSTRIAL FINISHING
RASKO
OAKWOOO BEACH POTW
PORT RICHMOND POTW
OWLS HE AD POTW
CONEY ISLAND POTW
26TH WARD POTW
NEWTOWN CREEK POTW
RED HOOK POTW
-------
Table 111-5-37; Dichloromethane point sources for bubble map Figure 111-5-25
FACILITY NAME
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
TETLEY INC
L C P CHEMICALS - NEW JERSEY INC.
PDI BUSINESS UNIT Of ICI AMERICAS
RONA PEARL
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES
CPS CHEMICAL CORP, INC
WILSON IMPERIAL CO
CHEVRON CHEMICAL COMPANY
UNION CARBIDE CORP BOUND BROOK PLT
BEECHAH LABORATORIES
MERCK & CO
MUTRO LABORATORIES INC
E.R. SQUIBB & SONS
CIBA-GEIGY CORP
PRIVATE FORMULATIONS, INC.
SCHERING CORP
ECOLAB, INC.
OAKITE PRODUCTS INC
ALLIED SIGNAL INC.
VALSPAR CORP
NEW YORK BRONZE POWDER CO. INC.
AKZO CHEMICALS INC.
JOHN B HOORE CORPORATION
MARISOL INC. CHEM. 01V.
MOHAWK LABORATORIES OF NJ
MON-ECO INDUSTRIES INC
ESSEX SPECIALTY PRODUCTS INC.
OELEET MERCHANDISING CORP
EXXON BAYUAY REFINERY
BANKS BROTHERS INC.
KERN FOAM PRODUCTS CORP
DRIVER HARRIS ALLOYS INC
CROWN METAL FINISHING CO. INC.
NEWARK INDUSTRIAL SPRAYING INC.
EASTERN STEEL BARREL CORP
A C COMPACTING PRESSES, INC.
FORD MOTOR CO
GENERAL MOTORS CORP. CPC GROUP
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO INC
E I DUPONT DE NEMOURS t CO
STREET ADDRESS
601 WEST LINDEN AVE
FOOT OF SOUTH WOOD AVE.
54 KELLOGG COURT
4 HOOK ROAD
800 ROSE LANE
OLD WATERWORKS RD
115 CHESTNUT STREET
SUMMIT AVENUE
1 RIVER ROAD
101 POSSUMTOWN RD
126 EAST LINCOLN AVE
650 SOUTH PLAINFIELD
1 SQUIBB DRIVE
556 MORRIS AVE
460 PLAINFIELD AVENUE
1011 MORRIS AVE
255 BLAIR ROAD
700 MIDDLESEX AVE
10 NORTH AVE EAST
3474 RAND AVE
515-519 DOUD AVENUE
MEADOW ROAD
ROUTE 9 AT PARKUAY
125 FACTORY LANE
STOUTS LANE
5 JOANNA COURT
1 CROSSMAN RD SOUTH
26 BLANCHARD ST
1400 PARK AVE
24 FEDERAL PLAZA
1253 NEWMARK AVE
308 MIDDLESEX STREET
40 BORIGHT AVE
12 AMSTERDAM STREET
4100 NEW BRUNSWICK AVE
1577 LIVINGSTON AVENUE
939 US ROUTE #1
1016 WEST EDGAR RD
US ROUTE 1 & AARON ROAD
CHEESEQUAKE ROAD
CITY
LINDEN
LINDEN
EDISON
BAYONNE
UNION BEACH
OLD BRIDGE
NEWARK
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
PI SCATAWAY
PI SCATAWAY
RAHUAY
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
NORTH BRUNSWICK
SUMMIT
EDISON
UNION
WOODBRIDGE TWP.
METUCHEN
ELIZABETH
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
ELIZABETH
EDISON
SAYREVILLE
MIDDLESEX
MONMOUTH JUNCTION
EAST BRUNSWICK
SAYREVILLE
NEWARK
LINDEN
BLOOMF1ELD
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
HARRISON
KENILWORTH
NEWARK
PISCATAWAY
NORTH BRUNSWICK
EDISON
LINDEN
NORTH BRUNSWICK
SAYREVILLE
ZIP
CODE
UTM-N
UTM-E
07036
07036
08817
07002
07735
08857
07105
07922
08854
08854
07065
07080
08902
07901
08840
07083
07095
08840
07201
07080
07201
08817
08872
08846
08852
08816
08872
07105
07036
07003
07080
07029
07033
07105
08854
08902
08818
07036
08902
08872
4495.3
4494.7
4487.5
4500.5
4477.1
4475.7
4508.1
4504.0
4488.7
4489.4
4495.7
4488.6
4480.1
4507.9
4485.7
4505.1
4491.8
4486.7
4501.3
4491.1
4502.3
4482.1
4481 .8
4489.9
4469.6
4477.0
4480.5
4508.9
4497.9
4517.3
4491.8
4509.8
4503.1
4501.6
4487.6
4478.2
4485.2
4496.2
4477.5
4478.8
564.7
567.3
550.6
575.2
571.8
557.2
570.0
547.0
540.7
543.6
562.4
549.7
547.0
553.3
549.5
561.3
562.7
555.1
570.2
549.7
569.3
552.2
559.4
540.9
536.5
550.4
557.3
572.2
567.4
568.7
548.4
571.3
559.0
570.4
547.3
544.0
553.2
562.8
542.5
556.7
FACILITY-WIDE
EMISSIONS
(tons/vr)
15.63
1.14
17.00
0.25
0.25
Z.35
3.60
0.44
0.90
H.49
64.00
17.79
12.05
5.66
19.32
51.14
0.07
0.50
2.58
3.36
0.62
1.08
0.20
1.09
21.38
0.25
0.80
0.47
0.35
36.30
0.13
9.00
30.24
6.00
0.13
0.58
8.63
21.28
0.24
4.59
-------
Table 111-5-37. continued: DichLorcroethane point sources for bubble nap Figure I)1-5-25
FACILITY NAME
VO
ro
41 BELL TELEPHONE LABORATORIES
42 TOWN OF LIVINGSTON;POTW
43 OLD BRIDGE HUA BROUNTOUN POTW
44 TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY HGHTS UPC POTU
45 SCHERSET-RARITAN VALLEY POTU
46 TOWNSHIP OF WOODSRlDCE POTU 1
47 TOWNSHIP OF UOODBRIDGE POTU 2
48 TOWN OF KEARNY POTU
49 BOROUGH OF SAVREVILLE POTW 2
50 MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 1 (#15669)
51 BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 1
52 CITY OF BAVOHNE POTU
S3 CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK POTU
54 JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX-UNION POTU
55 CITY OF PERTH AHBOY POTU
56 CITY OF LINDEN POTU
57 BOROUGH OF CARTERET POTU
58 OLD BRIDGE POTU
59 LIMPRO COMPANY POTU, THE
60 RAHUAY VALLEY SA POTW
61 LINDEN ROSELLE POTU
62 JAHESBURG SCHOOL FOR BOYS POTU
63 SOUTH AMBOY POTU
64 CITY OF HOBOKEN POTU
65 CITY OF ORANGE DPW POTW
66 CITY OF ELIZABETH POTU
67 MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 2
68 KIN-BUC, INC.
69 UN IOM OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
70 AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS CORP.
71 FMC CORPORATION
72 INDUSTRIAL FINISHING PRODUCTS
73 RASKO
74 OAKWOOD BEACH POTU
75 PORT RICHMOND POTW
76 OWLS HEAD POTU
77 CONEY ISLAND POTU
78 26TH WARD POTU
79 NEWTOWN CREEK POTU
80 RED HOOK POTU
STREET ADDRESS
600 MOUNTAIN AVENUE
POLHEHUS AVE
CLIFF ROAD
1 MAIN STREET
39 CENTRAL AVE
CHEVALIER AVE
630 AVE C
500 SOUTH FIRST STREET
260 HIGH STREET
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
399 ROOSEVELT AVE
OLD WATER WORKS ROAD
1050 EAST HAZELWOOD AVE
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
94 WASHINGTON STREET
MEADOW ROAD
350 ROOSEVELT AVENUE
567 RIDGE ROAD
PLAINSBORO ROAD
465 LOGAN STREET
1704 MCDONALD AVE
EMMET AVE/HILL ROAD
1801 RICHMOND TERRACE
BAY RIDGE AVE/THE NARROWS
A.VE Z/KNAPP ST
HENDRIX ST/JAMAICA BAY
329-369 GREENPOINT AVE
MARSHALL ST/LITTLE ST
CITY
NEU PROVIDENCE
LIVINGSTON
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
BRIDGEUATER
SEUAREN
UOODBRIDGE
KEARNY
SAYREVILLE
BAYONNE
NEU BRUNSWICK
ELIZABETH
PERTH AHBOY
LINDEN
CARTERET
OLD BRIDGE
RAHWAY
LINDEN
SOUTH AMBOY
HOBOKEN
ORANGE
ELIZABETH
EDISON
CARTERET
MONHOUTH JCT.
PLAINSBORO TUP.
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
STATEN ISLAND
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
ZIP
CODE
07974
07039
07922
08807
07077
07095
07032
08872
07002
08903
07202
08861
07036
07008
08857
07065
07036
08879
07030
0705 1
07207
08817
07008
08852
08536
11208
11230
UTM-N
4503.6
4517.7
4472.0
4503.4
4489.0
4489.2
4484.6
4507.2
4480.5
4481.0
4479.3
4499.7
4462.9
4498.4
4483.1
4505.3
4491.6
4478.6
4464.0
4492.8
4495.0
4465.0
4481 .0
4511.5
4510. S
4503.1
4463 .0
4481.2
4492.0
4468.8
4465.1
4512.9
4497.4
4488.7
4499.1
4498.7
4490.6
4500. 1
4509.0
4506.4
UTM-E
550.7
555.6
558.8
546.6
536.6
563.5
558.9
574.9
560.0
563.3
563.1
574.8
543.8
567.9
561.1
563.4
566.7
564.9
533.1
566.9
567.1
552.0
560.0
583.0
563.3
568.3
550.8
552.5
566.3
536.1
531.9
587.2
587.4
574.1
573.8
581.6
590.4
595.2
587.3
586.3
FACILITY-WIDE
EMISSIONS
(tons/vr)
0.01
1.08
0.25
1.30
1.39
0.98
0.39
1.64
0.07
27.32
0.17
4.18
4.79
38.96
1.56
3.03
0.95
1.15
0.48
0.87
6.17
0.09
0.71
5.45
1.99
6.31
6.21
0.01
1.82
1.26
1.14
0.01
47.93
0.37
2.28
77.92
26.72
3.42
68.88
9.47
-------
Figure III-5-26
STATEN ISLAND PROJECT MAPPING SYSTEM
METHYLENE CHLORIDE AREA & MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION DENSITIES
U!
O)
c
tE
o
c
I
1
4,531
4.521
4.511
4.50
4,49i
4,481
4,47
TONS/YR
540 55O 560 570 580 590
utm-easting
600
BIO
820
-------
Figure III-5-27
STATEN ISLAND PROJECT MAPPING SYSTEM
FORMALDEHYDE POINT SOURCES
T
i
O)
c
O
c
I
4.53
4.52
4.51
4,501
4.491
4,481
4.471
Staten Island
Middlesex
•4
540 550 560 57O 580 590 600 61O
utm-eastmg
I. UNITED VEIL DYEING &
2. ADM CORPORATION
3. PMC. INC. (SPECIALTI
4 INTERNATIONAL FLAVOR
6. HULS AMERICA. INC
6. CHEMOS CORPORATION
7. DU PONT GRASSELLI PL
I AIR PRODUCTS AND CHE
I. CARDOLITE COFU>.
10. SYNRAY CORPORATION
11. REICHHOLD CHEMICALS
12 UNION CARBIDE CORP B
13. E.R. SQUIBB 4 SONS
14. ECOLAB. INC.
11. HENKEL CORPORATION
K.REVIONINC.
17. COSMAIRINC
II AKIO CHEMICALS INC
II HHONE-POULENC INC
20. HOECMST CEIANESE CHE
21. HART PRODUCTS CORP
22 HENKEL INC
23. TROY CHEMICAL CORP.
24. MANVILLE SALES CORP
26 METZ METALLURGICAL C
29. KEARNY INDUSTRIES IN
27 EASTERN STEEL BARREL
28 E IOUPONT DE NEMOUR
2». WORLD CLASS INTEHNAT
30. KENRICH PETROCHEMICA
31. UNITED STATES GOVERN
32 AT&T NASSAU METALS
-------
Table HI-5-38; Formaldehyde point sources for bubble nap Figure IU-5-27
FACILITY HAKE
T
Cn
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
UNITED VEIL DYEING & FINISHING CO
ADM CORPORATION
PNC, INC. (SPECIALTIES GROUP)
INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS & FRAGRANCES
HULS AMERICA, INC.
CHEMOS CORPORATION
DU PONT GRASSELLI PLANT
AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS INC.
CARDOUTE CORP.
SYNRAY CORPORATION
REICHHOLO CHEMICALS INC.
UNION CARBIDE CORP BOUND BROOK PLT
E.R. SQUIBB I SONS
ECOLAB, INC.
HE NICE L CORPORATION
REVLON IMC.
COSMAIR INC.
AKZO CHEMICALS INC.
RHONE-POULENC INC.
HOECHST CELANESE CHEMICAL GROUP
HART PRODUCTS CORP.
HENKEL INC
TROY CHEMICAL CORP.
MANVILIE SALES CORP.
METZ METALLURGICAL CORP.
KEARMY INDUSTRIES INC.
EASTERN STEEL BARREL CORP
E I DUPONT DEr1h3V»H0.20B&
WORLD CLASS INTERNATIONAL KITCHENS
KENRICH PETROCHEMICALS INC
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
AT&T NASSAU METALS
STREET ADDRESS
28-50 BOSTWICK AVENUE
100 LINCOLN BLVD.
INDUSTRIAL AVE.
800 ROSE LANE
830 MAGNOLIA AVE
225-235 EMMET STREET
SOUTH WOOD AVE
DAYTON-JAMESBURG ROAD
500 DOREMUS AVE.
209 N. MICHIGAN AVENUE
726 ROCKEFELLER STREET
1 RIVER ROAD
1 SQUIBB DRIVE
255 BLAIR ROAD
FIRST & ESSEX STREETS
ROUTE 27 & TALHADGE RD.
200-222 TERMINAL AVENUE
MEADOU ROAD
297 JERSEY AVENUE
354 DOREHUS AVENUE
173 SUSSEX STREET
1301 JEFFERSON AVENUE
ONE AVENUE L
45 STULTS ROAD
3900 SOUTH CLINTON AVE
2624 HAMILTON BLVD.
4100 NEW BRUNSWICK AVE
CHEESEQUAKE ROAD
1930 EAST ELIZABETH AVE.
140 EAST 22ND STREET
CAMP KILMER
286 RICHMOND VALLEY ROAD
CITY
UTM-N UTM-E
JERSEY CITY
MIDDLESEX
FORDS
UNION BEACH
ELIZABETH
NEWARK
LINDEN
DAYTON
NEWARK
KENILUORTH
ELIZABETH
PISCATAWAY
NORTH BRUNSWICK
WOODBRIOGE TUP.
HARRISON
EDISON TOWNSHIP
CLARK
EDISON
NEW BRUNSWICK
NEWARK
JERSEX CUX
KOBOKEN
NEWARK
DAYTON
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
PISCATAWAY
SAYREVILLE
LINDEN
BAYONNE
EDISON
STATEN ISLAND
07305
08846
08863
07735
07201
071 U
07036
08810
07105
07033
07202
08854
08902
07095
07029
08817
07066
08817
08903
07105
07302
07030
07105
08810
07080
07080
08854
08872
07036
07002
08818
10309
4506.3
4491.0
44S4.5
4477.1
4501.8
4507.7
4496.1
4467.9
4507.6
4503.3
4497.9
4488.7
4480.1
4491 .8
4510.5
4486.1
4299.0
4482.1
4481 .8
4507.1
4507.0
4512.7
4507.3
4467.5
4484.5
4489.3
4487.6
4478.8
4499.9
4500.5
4484.0
4480.0
577.3
543.0
557.2
571.8
567.3
569.6
567.3
543.2
573.7
560.2
567.7
540.7
547.0
562.7
570.5
551.9
599.0
552.2
545.9
573.9
581.0
581.5
570.2
543.8
548.4
548.9
547.3
556.7
564.9
576.3
547.0
565.0
FACILITY-WIDE
EMISSIONS
(tons/YD
0.10
0.02
1.61
0.25
2.52
0.46
8.64
4.03
0.25
0.16
0.50
9.67
0.13
0.01
0.03
2.12
0.01
0.13
0.02
22.93
0.25
0.54
1.28
0.42
0.68
7.38
0.25
5.67
0.01
0.62
0.01
0.03
-------
Figure III-5-28
STATEN ISLAND PROJECT MAPPING SYSTEM
FORMALDEHYDE AREA & MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION DENSITIES
D)
o
c
I
+••
4.53
4.52
4,51
4.50
4.49
4.48
4.471
TONS/YR
540 550 560 570 580 590 6OO 610 620
utm-eastlng
-------
Figure III-5-29
STATEN ISLAND PROJECT MAPPING SYSTEM
PERCHLOROETHYLENE POINT SOURCES
O)
O
I
4.53
4.52
4.51
4.5CX
4.491
4,48<
4,47 I
UNITED LABEL CORP.
1. HEUBACH INC.
1. COOKSON PIGMENTS INC
4. HONIQ CHEMICAL AMD P
ECOLAB. INC.
7. JOHN B MOORE CORPORA
I. MOHAWK LABORATORIES
B CYCLE CHEM INC
10. BOXAL INC.
II. KLEINER METAL SPECIA
12. BAYONNE TERMINALS IN
13 P.O. OIL 4 CHEMICAL
14. ELIZABETHTOWN WATER
ELIZABETHTOWM WATER
It. ELIZABETHTOWN WATER
17. TOWN OF LIVINGSTON P
It. BOROUOH OF CARTERET
It. MIDDLESEX COUNTY POT
20. JOINT MEETING OF ESS
21. CITY OF PERTH AMBOY
. LINDEN ROSEUE POTW
23. OLD BRIDGE POTW
24. SOUTH
_ •
. CITY OF HOBOKEN POTW
21. SOMERSET PURITAN VAL
27. MIDDLESEX COUNTY POT
21. LIHPRO COMPANY POTW.
2B CITY OF ORANGE DPW P
JO. TOWNSHIP OP BERKELEY
31. BOROUOH OF JAYREV1LL
12. TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIC
33. CITY OF aiZABITH PO
14. CITY OF NCWBRUNSWIG
It JAMESBUHO SCHOOL FOf
It. RAMWAY VALLEY tA POT
540
550
560
utm-eastmg
CITY Of LINDEN POTW
CITY OF BAYONNE POTW
TOWN OF KEARNY POTW
TOWNSHIP OF WOODBBlD
SOUTH BRUNSWICK TOWN
oio BRIDGE MUA BROWN
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILL
SAYREV1LLEBOROSLF
KIN BUG INC. tl
BR OF SOUTH JERSEY
AMERICAN CYANAMIO SI
ASARCO INC. SIF
DU PONT WASHINGTON R
EDOEBORO DISPOSAL SI
EDISON TOWNSHIP SIF
LINDEN CITY SIF
SOUTH BRUNSWICK TWP
SOUTH PIAINFIELO BOR
GLOBAL CORP. SLF
NATIONAL LEAD LANDfl
KNIOHTS OF COLUMBUS
PLAINSBORO TWP SLF
LOTANO LANDFILL
CARTERET BOKO SLF
NL INDUSTRIES INC S
SOUTH AMBOY ClfY LAN
l.l.R SLF
CITIES SERVICE LANPF
BkS PACKAGING 4 STOR
ASHLAND CHEMICAL COM
W.A.I. TERMINALS INC
UNION OIL COMPANY OF
GORDON TERMINAL SERV
SOLVENTS RECOVERY SE
MAW SOL INC.
PERK CHEMICAL CO . I
. ACME STEEL PARTITION
. OAKWOOO BEACH POTW
. PORT RICHMOND POTW
. OWLS HEAD POTW
CONEY ISLAND POTW
. 2*TH WAflO POTW
. NEWTOWN CREEK POTW
RED HOOK POTW
METHANE RECOVERY PI A
-------
Table 111-5-39; Perchloroethylene point sources for bubble map figure 111-5-29
FACILITY NAME
t>
I-"
oo
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
UNITED LABEL CORP.
HEUBACH INC.
COOKSON PIGMENTS INC.
HONIG CHEMICAL AND PROCESSING CORP
ECOLAB, INC.
ROSS FRANK B CO INC
JOHN B MOORE CORPORATION
MOHAWK LABORATORIES OF NJ
CYCLE CHEH INC.
BOXAL INC.
KLEINER METAL SPECIALTIES INC.
BArONNE TERMINALS INC.
P.D. OIL & CHEMICAL STORAGE, INC.
ELIZABETHTOUN WATER COMPANY
ELIZABETHTOUN WATER COMPANY
ELIZABETHTOWN WATER COMPANY
TOWN OF LIVINGSTON POTU
BOROUGH OF CARTERET POTU
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTW 1
JOINT MEETING OF ESSEX-UNION POTU
CITY OF PERTH AMBOY POTU
LINDEN ROSELLE POTU
OLD BRIDGE POTU
SOUTH AMBOY POTU
CITY OF HOBOKEN POTU
SOMERSET-RARITAN VALLEY POTU
MIDDLESEX COUNTY POTU 2
LINPRO COMPANY POTU, THE
CITY OF ORANGE DPU POTU
TOWNSHIP OF BERKELEY HGHTS UPC POTU
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTU 2
TOWNSHIP OF UOODBRIDGE POTU 1
CITY OF ELIZABETH POTU
CITY OF NEU BRUNSWICK POTU
JAMESBURG SCHOOL FOR BOYS POTU
RAHUAY VALLEY SA POTU
CITY OF LINDEN POTU
CITY OF BAYONNE POTU
TOWN OF KEARNY POTU
STREET ADDRESS
65 CHAMBERS STREET
HEUBACH AVE.
256 VANDERPOOL STREET
414 WILSON AVENUE
255 BLAIR ROAD
6-10 ASH STREET
ROUTE 9 AT PARKWAY
STOUTS LANE
217 SOUTH FIRST ST.
5 BASSETT COURT
4315 NEU BRUNSWICK AVE.
2ND STREET & HOBART AVE.
FOOT OF EAST 22ND STREET
MORRIS AVE. & ROUTE 22
CHARLES STREET
NORTH AVENUE
399 ROOSEVELT AVE
CHEVALIER AVE
500 SOUTH FIRST STREET
260 HIGH STREET
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
OLD WATER WORKS ROAD
94 UASHINGTON STREET
POLHEMUS AVE
CLIFF ROAD
1050 EAST HAZELWOOO AVE
5005 SOUTH WOOD AVE
630 AVE C
39 CENTRAL AVE
CITY
UTM-N
UTH-E
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
UOOOBRIDGE TWP.
JERSEY CITY
SAYREVILLE
MONMOUTH JUNCTION
ELIZABETH
CRANBURY
SOUTH PLAINFIELD
BAYONNE
BAYONNE
UNION
MOUNTAINSIDE
PLAINFIELD
LIVINGSTON
CARTERET
SAYREVILLE
ELIZABETH
PERTH AMBOY
LINDEN
OLD BRIDGE
SOUTH AMBOY
HOBOKEN
BRIDGEUATER
ORANGE
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
SEUAREN
ELIZABETH
NEU BRUNSWICK
RAHUAY
LINDEN
BAYONNE
KEARNY
07105
07114
07114
07105
07095
07304
08872
08852
07206
08512
07080
07002
07002
07083
07092
07061
07039
07008
08872
07202
08861
07036
08857
08879
07030
08807
07051
07922
07077
07207
08903
07065
07036
07002
07032
4508.9
4507.2
4507.3
4507.3
4491.8
4506.8
4481.8
4469.8
4299.0
4471.5
4299.0
4499.7
4500.9
4501.0
4502.5
4497.0
4517.7
4491.6
4481.0
4498.4
4483.1
4495.0
4478.6
4481.0
4511.5
4489.0
4483.0
4464.0
4510.8
4503.4
4480.5
4489.2
4503.1
4482.9
4465.0
4492.8
4505.3
4499.7
4507.2
572.2
569.7
569.3
572.6
562.6
579.3
559.3
536.5
599.0
545.8
599.0
574.3
575.8
565.0
555.1
549.1
555.6
566.7
563.3
567.9
561.1
567.1
564.9
560.0
583.0
536.6
550.8
533.1
563.3
546.6
560.0
563.5
568.3
543.8
552.0
566.9
563.4
574.8
574.9
FACILITY-WIDE
EMISSIONS
(tons/yr)
0.10
6.15
0.13
0.62
0.40
0.44
0.01
0.44
0.54
50.57
1.75
0.16
3.69
0.23
0.40
0.10
0.23
0.20
5.81
198.54
0.33
31.71
0.24
2.91
1.16
0.07
23.11
1.96
0.42
5.31
0.30
0.21
1.34
1.02
0.39
8.10
0.64
0.89
0.35
-------
Table 111-5-39. continued: Perchloroethylene point sources for bubble map Figure IH-5-29
FACILITY NAME
T
to
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
71
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE POTU 2
SOUTH BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP
OLD BRIDGE MUA BROWMTOUN POTU
BOROUGH OF SAYREVILLE POTW 1
SAYREVILLE BORO SLF
K1N-BUC INC. #1
BFI OF SOUTH JERSEY SLF
AMERICAN CYANAHID SLF-HAZ
ASARCO IVC. SLF
DU PONT-WASHINGTON RD. SLF
EDGEBORO DISPOSAL SIF
EDISON TOWNSHIP SLF
LINDEN CITY SLF
SOUTH BRUNSWICK TUP. SLF
SOUTH PLA1NF1ELD BOfiO
GLOBAL CORP. SLF
NATIONAL LEAD LANDFILL
KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS LANDFILL
PLA1NSBORO TUP, SLF EXPANSION
LOTANO LANDFILL
CARTERET BORO SLF
NL INDUSTRIES INC. SLF
SOUTH AMBOY CITY LANDFILL
l.L.R. SLF
CITIES SERVICE LANDFILL
B&S PACKAGING & STORAGE CO.. INC.
ASHLAND CHEMICAL COMPANY
W.A.S. TERMINALS INC.
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
GORDON TERMINAL SERVICE CO.
SOLVENTS RECOVERY SERVICE
MAR1SOL INC.
PERK CHEHICAL CO., INC
ACHE STEEL PARTITION CO. INC.
OAKUDOO BEACH POTU
PORT RICHMOND POTW
OWLS HEAD POTW
CONEY ISLAND POTU
261H WARD POTW
NEUTOVM CREEK POTW
RED HOOK POTW
METHANE RECOVERY PLANT
STREET ADDRESS
1 MAIN STREET
RT 522 & DAYTON -JAMESBURG RD
4900 TREMLEY POINT
WASHINGTON ROAD
EDGEBORO ROAD
ERNSTON ROAD
All WILSON AVENUE
221 FOUNDRY STREET
126 PASSAIC STREET
350 ROOSEVELT AVENUE
FOOT OF HOOK ROAD
125 FACTORY LANE
513 PORTER AVENUE
EMHET WE/HILL ROAD
1801 RICHMOND TERRACE
BAY RIDGE AVE/THE NARROWS
AVE Z/KNAPP ST
HENDRIX ST/JAHAICA BAY
329-369 GREENPOINT AVE
HARSHALL ST/LITHE Sf
FRESH KILLS LANDFILL
CITY
WOOD BRIDGE
DAYTON
SAYREVILLE
EDISON TOWNSHIP
LINDEN
SAYKVILLE
EAST BRUNSWICK
EDISON
LINDEN
SOUTH BRUNSWICK
SOUTH PLA1NFIELD
OLD BRIDGE
PERTH AHBOY
MONROE TOWNSHIP
PLAINS60RO TOWNSHIP
EDISON TOWNSHIP
CARTERET
SAYREVILLE
SOUTH AMBOY
EDISON
SOUTH BRUNSWICK
NEWARK
NEWARK
NEWARK
CARTERET
BAYONNE
LINDEN
MIDDLESEX
ELIZABETH
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
STATEH ISLAND
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
BROOKLYN
STATEN ISLAND
ZIP
CODE
07095
08810
06872
08817
07036
06372
06316
06816
07036
07080
06857
08861
03536
06817
07008
06872
08879
08818
07105
07114
07104
07008
07002
07036
08846
07207
11222
10314
UTH-N
4484.6
4469.0
4472.0
4479.3
4477.0
4482.5
4465.5
4496.0
4485.5
44BC.O
4480.0
4482.0
4494.5
4469.0
4490.5
4479.0
4486.0
4468.0
4463.5
4494.5
4494.0
4463.0
4483.0
4482.0
4469.5
4508.7
4508.5
4511.9
4492.0
4500.5
4496.0
4489.9
4499.8
4508. 5
4488.7
4499.1
4498.7
4490.6
4500.1
4509.0
4506.4
4498.0
UTM-E
558.9
541.8
558.8
563.1
554.0
554.5
552.5
465.5
562.5
557.0
553.0
554.0
564.0
538.5
550.5
561.0
562.5
548.0
535.0
553.5
566.5
559.0
559.5
556.5
537.0
572.3
573.1
570.3
566.3
576,1
563.1
540.8
568.5
588.3
574.1
573.8
581.6
590.4
595.2
587.3
566.3
570.0
FACILlTY-UtOE
EMISSIONS
Uons/vr>
0.08
0.11
1.01
0.67
0.01
0.04
0.04
0.01
0.04
0.01
0.23
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.09
0.01
0.06
1.24
0.90
0.81
0.10
0.19
0.25
0.03
33.95
0,21
3.29
0.44
5.92
1.23
7.70
2.02
0.07
-------
Figure III-5-30
STATEN ISLAND PROJECT MAPPING SYSTEM
PERCHLOROETHYLENE AREA & MOBILE SOURCE EMISSION DENSITIES
r
ro
c
CD
O
C
4,53
4,52
4.51
4.50
4.49i
4,48
4,471
TONS/YR
540 550 560 570
580
590 6OO
610 620
utm-easting
-------
Table UI-5-40; Mapping values (shading) for the area and mobile source emissions density maps Figures III-5-21, 22, 24, 26, 28, and 30
Happing values, ranges in tons/year: 0 = 0, 1 = >0 to <5, 2 = >5 to <10. 3 = >10 to <15, 4 = >!5 to <20, 5 = >20 to <30. 6 = >30.
UTH-M
UTH-E
BENZEHE
CADVAL
FORMAL-
DEHYDE
FORHVAL
DiCHLOfiO-
METHANE
DCMVAL
>
o
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
13.00
14.00
15.00
16.00
17.00
16.00
19.00
20.00
21.00
22.00
23.00
24.00
25.00
26.00
27.00
2S.OO
29.00
30.00
31.00
32.00
33.00
34.00
4481.00
4483.00
4485.00
4487.00
4481 .00
4483.00
4485.00
4487.00
4481.00
4483.00
4485.00
4487.00
4489.00
4491.00
4493.00
4495.00
4497.00
4483.00
4485.00
4487.00
4489.00
4491.00
4493.00
4495.00
4497.00
4485.00
4487.00
4489.00
4491 .00
4493.00
4495.00
4497.00
4485.00
4487.00
565.00
565.00
565.00
565.00
567.00
567.00
567.00
567.00
569.00
569.00
569.00
569.00
569.00
569.00
569.00
569.00
569.00
571 .00
571.00
571.00
571.00
571.00
571 .00
571 .00
571.00
573.00
573.00
573.00
573.00
573.00
573.00
573.00
575.00
575.00
3.13
3.23
0.00
0.00
0.56
7.10
21.67
5.55
0.00
5.14
18.00
19.55
4.09
1.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.86
13.88
14.42
6.37
15.12
23.11
22.56
10.67
8.53
9.78
5.92
5.50
16.96
21.58
3.38
2.05
6.72
1
1
0
0
1
2
5
2
0
2
4
4
^
1
0
0
0
\
3
3
2
4
5
5
3
2
2
2
2
4
5
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
4
1
2
1
1
1
3
4
1
2
2
3
2
1
3
0.000
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.001
0.003
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.003
0.005
0.001
0.002
0.001
0.001
0.001
0.003
0.006
0.002
0.002
0.004
0.005
0.002
0.001
0.004
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.688 1
0.721 1
0.000 0
0.000 0
0.133 1
1.580 1
4.740 1
1.218 1
0.001 1
1.138 1
3.985 1
4.282 1
0.893 1
0.220 1
0.000 C
0.000 C
0.000 t
0.417 1
3.088
3.285
1.404
3.345
5.049
4.921
2.331
1.952
2.312
1.334
1.265
3.788
4.821
0.797
0.460
1.581
0.037
0.097
0.000
0.000
0.068
0.179
0.068
0.041
0.001
0.091
0.342
0.104
0.000
0.000
) 0.000
) 0.000
) 0.000
0.070
0.349
0.805
0.075
0.270
0.039
0.004
0.013
0.534
1.046
0.241
0.377
0.507
0.661
0.344
0.079
0.667
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.402
1.058
0.000
0.000
0.737
1.950
0.735
0.442
0.014
0.992
3.718
1.132
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.756
3.789
8.746
0.813
2.931
0.419
0.039
0.137
5.798
11.365
2.620
4.099
5.504
7.1S4
3.734
0.861
7.247
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
^
1
1
i
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
1 "BEMVAL" {also CADVAL. FORMVAL, OCMVAL and PERCVAL) means the napping value applied to each grid cell, which corresponds to the emissions
density range (in tons per year).
2 "HJ METHOD BENVAL" is the population-based value for comparison with the HI VMT-based value generated for the Staten Island grid cells only.
-------
Table II1-5-40. continued: Happing values (shading) for the area and mobile source emissions density maps Figures III-5-21, 22, 24, 26, 28, and 30
Happing values, ranges in tons/year: 0 = 0, 1 = >0 to <5, 2 = >5 to <10, 3 = >10 to <15, 4 = >15 to <20, 5 = >20 to <30. 6 = >30
35.00
36.00
37.00
38.00
39.00
40.00
41.00
42.00
43.00
44.00
45.00
46.00
47.00
48.00
49.00
50.00
51.00
52.00
53.00
> 54.00
1
UTM-N
4489.00
4491.00
4493.00
4495.00
4497.00
4487.00
4489.00
4491.00
4493.00
4495.00
4497.00
4489.00
4491.00
4493.00
4495.00
4497.00
4491 .00
4493.00
4495.00
4497.00
UTH-E
575 i 00
575.00
575.00
575.00
575.00
577.00
577.00
577.00
577.00
577.00
577.00
579.00
579.00
579.00
579.00
579.00
581.00
581.00
581.00
581.00
BENZENE
5.19
19.33
27.00
19.11
18.92
3.68
16.30
2.07
15.01
9.95
10.04
4.14
19.80
17.52
21.50
15.50
2.79
36.25
7.47
1.25
BEMVAL1
2
4
5
4
4
1
4
1
4
2
3
1
4
4
5
4
1
6
2
1
NJ
METHOD
BENVAL2
3
1
4
4
2
2
3
2
3
3
3
2
3
3
4
5
1
3
2
0
FORMAL- DICHLORO- PERCHLORO-
CADHIUH CADVAL DEHYDE FORHVAL METHANE DCMVAL ETHYLENE
0.004
0.002
0.007
0.007
0.003
0.002
0.005
0.002
0.004
0.004
0.004
0.002
0.005
0.005
0.006
0.008
0.002
0.005
0.002
1.243 1 0.642 1 6.972
4.256 1 0.224
6.053 2 0.945
4.344
4.202
0.854
3.693
0.510
3.388
2.287
2.300
0.964
4.448
3.958
4.853
3.609
0.653
8.012
1.675
0.000 0 0.272
1.014
0.435
0.292
0.794
0.342
0.658
0.674
0.641
0.356
0.755
0.793
0.940
1.332
0.252
0.607
0.268
2.432
10.269
11.017
4.726
3.172
8.622
3.718
7.143
7.322
6.962
3.868
8.206
8.619
10.208
14.474
2.734
6.595
2.916
0.000 0 0.000
£J New Jersey Cells
N> 55.00
56.00
57.00
58.00
59.00
60.00
61.00
62.00
63.00
64.00
65.00
66.00
67.00
68.00
4451.00
4451.00
4451.00
4453.00
4453.00
4453.00
4453.00
4455.00
4455.00
4455.00
4455.00
4455.00
4455.00
4455.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
541.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.02
0.23
0.19
0.06
0.00
0.06
0.19
0.23
0.23
0.23
0.11
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
0.000 0 0.010 1 0.000 0 0.010
0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000
0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.010
0.000 0 0.100 0.010 1 0.140
0.000 0 0.080 0.010 1 0.110
0.000 0 0.030 0.000 0 0.030
0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000
0.000 0 0.030 0.000 0 0.030
0.000 0 0.080 0.010 0.120
0.000 0 0.100 0.010 0.140
0.000 0 0.100 0.010 0.140
0.000 0 0.100 0.010 0.140
0.000 0 0.060 0.010 0.060
1 "BENVAL" (also CADVAL, FORMVAL, DCMVAL and PERCVAL) means the mapping value applied to each grid cell, which corresponds to the emissions
density range (in tons per year).
2 "NJ METHOD BENVAL" is the population-based value for comparison with the Mr VMT-based value generated for the Staten Island grid cells only.
-------
Table lll-S-40, continued: Happing values (shading) for the area and mobile source emissions density maps Figures III-5-21, 22, 24. 26, 28, and 30
Napping values, ranges in tons/year: 0 = 0, 1 = >0 to <5, 2 = >5 to <10, 3 = >10 to <15, 4 = >15 to <20, 5 * >20 to <30, 6 = >30
UTM-N UTH-E
NJ
METHOD
BENVAl1 BEHVAL2 CADMIUM CAOVAL
PERCHLORO-
ETHYLEHE PERCVAL
69.00
70.00
71.00
72.00
73.00
74.00
75.00
76.00
77.00
78.00
79.00
80.00
If 81.00
is) 82.00
g 83.00
84.00
85.00
86.00
87.00
88.00
89.00
90.00
91.00
92.00
93.00
94.00
95.00
96.00
97.00
98.00
99.00
100.00
101.00
102.00
103.00
4457.00
4457.00
4457.00
4457.00
4457.00
4457.00
4457.00
4457.00
4457.00
4457.00
4459.00
4459.00
4459.00
4459.00
4459.00
4459.00
4459.00
4459.00
4459.00
4459.00
4459.00
4459.00
4461 .00
4461.00
4461 .00
4461.00
4461.00
4461.00
4461.00
4461 .00
4461.00
4461.00
4461 .00
4461.00
4461.00
537.00
539.00
541.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
535.00
537.00
539.00
541.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
533.00
535.00
537.00
539.00
541.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
0.06 1
0.33
0.23
0.24
0.34
0.76
0.49
0.19
0.22
0.03
0.23
1.04
0.62
0.26
0.25
0.28
1.38
1.22
0.23
0.23
0.19
0.03
0.16
1.28
1.32
1.31
0.48
0.18
0.52
1.46
1.36
1.09
0.35
0.32
0.37
'
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.030 1
0.150 1
0.100 1
0.100 1
0.150 1
0.320 1
0.010 1
0.080 1
0.100 1
0.020
0.100
0.410
0.260
0.120
0.110
0.130
0.550
0.480
0.100
0.100
0.080
0.020
0.070
0.520
0.530
0.530
0.210
0.070
0.220
0.570
0.540
0.440
0.160
0.150
0.160
0.000 C
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.040
0.030
0.010
0.010
0.000
0.010
0.060
0.030
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.070
0.070
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.000 I
0.010
0.070
0.070
0.070
0.030
0.010
0.030
0.080
0.070
0.060
0.020
0.020
1 0.020
) 0.040
0.190
0.140
0.150
0.200
0.440
0.280
0.110
0.130
0.020
0.140
0.600
0.360
0.150
0.150
0.170
0.800
0.710
0.140
0.140
0.120
) 0.020
1 0.090
1 0.750
1 0.760
1 0.760
1 0.270
1 0.110
1 0.310
1 0.840
1 0.790
1 0.620
1 0.200
1 0.180
1 0.210
1 "BENVAl" (also CAOVAL, FORNVAL, DCNVAL and PERCVAL) means the mapping value applied to each grid cell, which corresponds to the emissions
density range (in tons per year).
"NJ METHOD BENVAL" is the population-based value for comparison uith the NY VMT-based value generated for the Staten Island grid cells only.
-------
Table 111-5-40. continued: Mapping values (shading) for the area and mobile source emissions density maps Figures 1II-5-21, 22. 24. 26, 28, and 30
Happing values, ranges in tons/year: 0=0. 1 = >0 to <5, 2 = >5 to <10, 3 = >10 to <15, 4 = >15 to <20, 5 - >20 to <30, 6 = >30
I
104.00
105.00
106.00
107.00
108.00
109.00
110.00
111.00
112.00
113.00
114.00
115.00
116.00
117.00
118.00
119,00
120.00
121.00
122.00
123.00
124.00
125.00
126.00
127.00
128.00
129.00
130.00
131.00
132.00
133.00
134.00
135.00
136.00
137.00
138.00
UTM-H
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4463.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4465.00
4467.00
4467.00
4467.00
4467.00
UTM-E
533.00
535.00
537.00
539.00
541.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
533.00
535.00
537.00
539.00
541.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
535.00
537.00
539.00
541.00
BENZENE
0.24
1.26
1.03
1.09
0.32
0.32
3.22
1.83
0.74
1.17
0.76
0.30
0.45
0.37
0.03
0.02
0.27
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.42
1.45
1.44
1.26
0.82
0.45
0.54
1.02
0.08
0.00
1.65
1.02
0.32
NJ
METHOD
BEMVAL1 BEMVAL2 CADMIUM
!
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
4
1
1
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 1 0.000
1 1 0.000
1 1 0.000
0 0 0.000
1 1 0.000
1 1 0.000
1 1 0.000
CADVAl
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FORMAL -
DEHYDE
0.110
0.510
0.410
0.440
0.150
0.150
1.200
0.710
0.310
0.460
0.320
0.130
0.190
0.160
0.020
0.000
0.120
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.150
0.180
0.570
0.570
0.500
0.340
0.190
0.230
0.410
0.040
0.000
0.640
0.410
0.150
FORHVAL
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
DICHLORO-
METHAHE
0.010
0.070
0.060
0.060
0.020
0.020
0.170
0.100
0.040
0.060
0.040
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.000
0.000
0.010
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.020
0.080
0.080
0.070
0.040
0.020
0.030
0.050
0.000
0.000
0.090
0.050
0.020
OCMVAl
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
PERCHLOfiO-
ETHYLEHE PERCVAL
0.150
0.730
0.600
0.620
0.190
0.190
1.870
1.060
0.430
0.680
0.440
0.180
0.250
0.210
0.020
0.010
0.160
0.190
.190
.190
.190
.190
0.240
0.840
0.830
0.730
0.480
0.250
0.320
0.590
0.050
0.000
0.950
0.590
0.190
1 "BENVAL" (also CADVAL, FORMVAL, DCMVAL and PERCVAL) means the mapping value applied to each grid cell, which corresponds to the emissions
density range
-------
Table llt-5-40. continued: Happing values (shading) for the area and mobile source emissions density maps Figures UI-S-21. 22, 24. 26, 28, and 30
Mapping values, ranges in tons/year: 0=0, 1 = »0 to <5, 2 = >5 to ilO, 3 = >10 to <15, 4 = >15 to <20, 5 = >20 to 30
UTM-M
HI
HET«OD FORMAL- DICHLORO-
UTH-E BENZENE BENVAl' BENVAL2 CADMIUM CADVAL DEHTOE FORHVAL HETHAME
DCMVAL
PERCHLORO-
ETHTLEHE
139.00
140.00
141.00
142.00
143.00
144.00
145.00
146.00
147.00
U8.00
149.00
150.00
t> 151.00
1 152.00
g 153.00
Cn 154.00
155.00
156.00
157.00
158.00
159.00
160.00
161.00
162.00
163.00
164.00
165.00
166.00
167.00
168.00
169.00
170.00
171.00
172.00
173.00
4467.00
4467.00
4467.00
4467.00
4467.00
4467.00
4467.00
4467.00
4467.00
4467.00
4467.00
4467.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4471.00
4471.00
4471.00
4471.00
4471.00
4471.00
4471 .00
4471.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
537.00
539.00
541.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
537.00
539.00
541.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
0.32
0.32
0.32
0.85
2.24
4.33
3.04
2.28
4.30
2.30
0.82
0.06
0.91
2.18
1.04
0.71
0.02
0.44
1.47
2.20
4.95
4.86
2.67
4.06
1.33
1.27
0.82
0.1B
1.46
2.45
0.73
1.42
0.91
1.21
3.54
1
1
I
1
0.000
1 0.000
I 0.000
1 0.000
1 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
1 0.000
1 0.000
1 0.000
1 0.000
1 0.000
1 0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.150 1
0.150 1
0.150
0.350
0.850
1.580
1.140
0.860
1.570
0.890
0.340
0.030
0.380
0.830
0.410
0.290
0.000
0.180
0.580
0.840
1.790
1.760
1.010
1.490
0.530
0.510
0.340
0.070
0.570
0.930
0.300
0.560
0.380
0.480
1.310
0.020 1
0.020 1
0.020
0.050
0.120
0.230
0.160
0.120
0.230
0.120
0.040
0.000
0.050
0.120
0.060
0.040
0.000
0.020
0.080
0.120
0.260
0.260
0.140
0.220
0.070
0.070
0.040
0.010
0.080
0.130
0.040
0.080
0.050
0.060
0.190
0.190
0.190
0.190
0.500
1.300
2.510
1.760
1.320
2.500
1.330
0.470
0.040
0.530
1.260
0.600
0.410
0.010
0.250
0.850
1.280
2.870
2.820
1.550
2.350
0.770
0.740
0.480
0.110
0.840
1.420
0.420
0.820
0.530
0.700
2.060
PERCVAL
1
1
1 "6ENVAL" (also CADVAL, FORHVAL, DCMVAL and PERCVAL) means the mapping value applied to each grid cell, which corresponds to the emissions
density range (in tons per year).
2 »NJ METHOD BENVAL" is the population-based value for comparison with the NY VMT-based value generated for the Staten Island grid cells only.
-------
t
o
table 111-5-40. continued: Happing values (shading) for the area and mobile source emissions density maps Figures 111-5-21, 22, 24, 26, 28, and 30
Happing values, ranges in tons/year: 0 = 0, 1 = >0 to <5, 2 = >5 to <10, 3 = >10 to <15, 4 » >15 to <20, 5 = >20 to <30, 6 = >30
NJ
METHOD
BEMZEME BEMVAL1 BEMVAL2 CADMIUM CADVAL
174.00
175.00
176.00
177.00
178.00
179.00
180.00
181.00
182.00
183.00
184.00
185.00
186.00
187.00
188.00
189.00
190.00
191.00
192.00
193.00
194.00
195.00
196.00
197.00
198.00
199.00
200.00
201.00
202.00
203.00
204.00
205.00
206.00
207.00
208.00
4471.00
4471.00
4471.00
4471 .00
4471 .00
4471.00
4471.00
4473.00
4473.00
4473.00
4473.00
4473.00
4473.00
4473.00
4473.00
4473.00
4473.00
4473.00
4473.00
4473.00
4473.00
4475.00
4475.00
4475.00
4475.00
4475.00
4475.00
4475.00
4475.00
4475.00
4475.00
4475.00
4475.00
4475.00
4477.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
541 .00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561 .00
563.00
565.00
567.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
567.00
545.00
4.32
4.67
1.83
0.60
0.63
1.39
1.09
0.34
1.48
1.97
2.37
2.50
4.05
4.60
6.80
1.97
1.45
2.35
2.10
3.08
1.10
0.40
4.37
4.61
5.53
3.12
3.69
2.66
2.12
3.75
5.29 2
4.17
2.29
0.58
0.9B 1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.580
1.690
0.710
0.250
Q.260
0.550
0.440
0.150
0.590
0.760
0.910
0.950
1.490
1.670
2.410
0.760
0.570
0.900
0.810
1.150
0.440
0.170
1.590
1.680
1.990
1.170
1.360
1.010
0.810
1.380
1.910
1.520
0.880
0,250
0.400
FORMAL-
JEHTOE
1.580
1.690
0.710
0.250
Q.260
0.550
0.440
0.150
0.590
0.760
0.910
0.950
1.490
1.670
2.410
0.760
0.570
0.900
0.810
1.150
0.440
0.170
1.590
1.680
1.990
1.170
1.360
1.010
0.810
1.380
1.910
1.520
0.880
0,250
0.400
FORMVAL
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
DlCHLOfiO-
METHANE
0.230
0.250
0.100
0.030
0.030
0.070
0.060
0.020
0.080
0.110
0.130
0.130
0.220
0.250
0.360
0.110
0.080
0.130
0.110
0.160
0.060
0.020
0.230
0.250
0.300
0.170
0.200
0.140
0.110
0.200
0.280
0.210
0.120
0.030
0.050
PERCHLORO-
ETHTLEHE
2.510
2.700
1.060
0.350
0.370
0.800
0.630
0.200
0.870
1.140
1.370
1.450
2.340
2.670
3.950
1.150
0.840
1.360
1.220
1.780
0.630
0.230
2.530
2.670
3.210
1.810
130
550
1.230
2.170
3.070
2.420
1.330
0.34C
0.560
1 "BENVAL"
-------
Table 111-5-40. continued: Napping values (shading) for the area and mobile source emissions density maps Figures 111-5-21, 22. 24, 26. 28, and 30
Mapping values, ranges in tons/year: 0=0, 1 = >0 to <5, 2 = >5 to <10, 3 = >10 to <15, 4 = >15 to <20, 5 = >20 to 530, 6 = >30
r
s
UTH-M
UTH-E
NJ
METHOD
6EHVAL1 BtHVAl2 CADMIUM CMWAL
209.00
210.00
211.00
212.00
213.00
214.00
215.00
216.00
217.00
218.00
219.00
220.00
221.00
222.00
223.00
224.00
225.00
226.00
227.00
228.00
229.00
230.00
231.00
232.00
233.00
234.00
235.00
236.00
237.00
238.00
239.00
240.00
241.00
242.00
243.00
4477.00
4477.00
4477.00
4477.00
4477.00
4477.00
4477.00
4477.00
4477.00
4479.00
4479.00
4479.00
4479.00
4479.00
4479.00
4479.00
4479.00
4479.00
4479.00
4481.00
4481.00
4481.00
4481.00
4481.00
4481.00
4481.00
4481.00
4481.00
4481 .00
4481 .00
4483.00
4483.00
4483.00
4483.00
4483.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561 .00
563.00
565.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551 .00
5.B5
11.84
5.21
3.60
1.59
1.90
2. OS
2.78
0.58
5.23
12.89
12.20
7.44
1.57
1.16
1.41
2.09
6.62
2.26
0.52
3.07
4.05
3.97
3.55
1.66
1.16
0.42
3.12
13.56
3.98
0.24
1.81
2.35
2.37
1.89
2 2
3 3
2 2
1
1
1
1
1
1 1
2 2
3 2
3 2
2 ;
1 1
i
1
1
2
1
i
1
1
1
1
1
i
1
i
3
1
4
1
1
1
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1 0.000
i 0,000
\ 0.000
! 0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.090
4.020
1.860
1.330
0.620
0.730
0.800
1.050
0.250
1.890
4.330
4.120
2.610
0.610
0.460
0.560
0.800
2.420
0.850
0.220
1.150
1.490
1.460
1.310
0.720
0.460
0.180
1.170
4.540
1.470
0.110
0.710
0.900
0.910
0.730
FORMAL-
DEHYDE fORKVAL
DICHLORO-
HETHAUE
0.310
0.630
0.280
0.190
0.080
0.100
0.110
0.150
0.030
0.280
0.690
0.650
0.400
0.080
0.060
O.OBO
0.110
0.360
0.120
0.030
0.160
0.220
0.210
0.190
0.100
0.060
0.020
0.170
0.720
0.210
0.010
0.100
0.130
0.130
0.100
pcnm
i
i
i
i
1
i
1
i
i
i
t
i
i
i
1
1
i
1
1
i
1
1
i
1
i
i
1
i
1
i
1
1
1
1
i
= >20 to 530,
PERCHLORO-
ETHKLEME PE
3.400
6.870
3.020
2.090
0.920
1.100
1.200
1.610
0.340
3.040
7.470
7.070
4.310
0.910
0.670
0.810
1.210
3.960
1.310
0.310
1.780
2.3SO
2.300
2.060
i.oao
0.670
0.240
1.810
7.860
2.310
0.150
1.040
1.360
1.370
1.100
6 = >
RCVAl
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1 "BENVAL" (also CADVAL, FORMVAL, DCNVAL and PERCVAL) means the mapping value applied to each grid cell, which corresponds to the emissions
density range {in tons per year].
* "HJ METHOD BENVAL" is the population-based value for comparison with the MY VHT-based value generated for the Stater> Island grid cells only.
-------
X
a
00
Table III-5-40. continued: Mapping values (shading) for the area and mobile source emissions density maps Figures 111-5-21, 22, 24, 26, 28, and 30
Mapping values, ranges in tons/year: 0=0, 1 = >0 to <5, 2 = >5 to £10, 3 = >10 to <15, 4 = >15 to <20, 5 = >20 to <30, 6 = >30
UTM-E
NJ
METHOD FORMAL-
L1 BEHVAL' CAOMIUH CADVAL DEHYDE FORHVAL
244.00
245.00
246.00
247.00
248.00
249.00
250.00
251.00
252.00
253. DC
254.00
255.00
256.00
257.00
258.00
259.00
260.00
261.00
262.00
263.00
264.00
265.00
266.00
267.00
268.00
269.00
270.00
271.00
272.00
273.00
274.00
275.00
276.00
277.00
278.00
4483.00
4483.00
4483.00
4483.00
4483.00
4483.00
4483.00
4485.00
4485.00
4485.00
4485.00
4485.00
4485.00
4485.00
4485.00
4485.00
4485.00
4485.00
4485.00
4485.00
4487.00
4487.00
4487.00
4487.00
4487.00
4487.00
4487.00
4487.00
4487.00
4487.00
4487.00
4487.00
4487.00
4487.00
4489.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561 .00
563.00
565.00
567.00
543.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557,00
559.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
567.00
569.00
543.00
2.17
\6.n
5.76
8.34
6.98
8.83
2.01
2.11
2.22
1.85
1.75
1.33
2.26
21.61
6.33
8.44
4.42
5.74
1.52
0.67
4.48
5.22
5.80
6.74
1.47
2.57
3.06
3.87
8.08
8.34
8.36
2.33
6.85
1.45
0.88
1
4
2
2
2
2
1
5
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
4
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
1
2
1
1
0.000
O.OUl
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.010
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.850
5.520
2.060
2.910
2.460
3.070
0.780
0.810
0.840
0.720
0.680
0.530
0.850
6.990
2.260
2.940
1.620
2.050
0.600
0.270
1.640
1.880
2.080
2.380
0.580
0.970
1.150
1.430
2.820
2.910
2.910
0.900
2.430
0.570
0.360
01CHLORO-
HETHAKE
0.120
0.690
0.310
0.450
O.J70
0.470
0.110
0.110
0.120
0.100
0.090
0.070
0.120
1.150
0.340
0.450
0.240
0.310
0.080
0.040
0.240
0.280
0.310
0.360
0.080
0.140
0,160
0.210
0.430
0.450
0.450
0.120
0.370
0.080
O.OSO
DCMVAL
1
^
1
1
PERCHLORO-
ETHYLEME PERCVAL
1.260 1
9.720 2
3.350
4.630
4.040
5.130
1.160
1.220
1.290
I.OSO
1.010
0.770
1.310
12.530
3.670
4.900
2.560
3.330
0.890
0.390
2.600
3.030
3.370
3.900
0.850
490
770
250
690
830
840
350
3.970
0.840
0.520
1 "BEttVAl" (also CADVAL, FORHVAl, DCMVAL and PERCVAL) means the mapping value applied to each grid cell, which corresponds to the emissions
density range
-------
Tabte lll-S-40. continued: Mapping values (shading) for the area and mobile source emissions density maps Figures IH-5-21, 22, 24, 26, 28, and 30
Happing values, ranges in tons/year: 0 = 0, 1 = >0 to <5, 2 = >5 to <10, 3 = >10 to <15, 4 = >1S to <20, 5 = >20 to <30, 6 = >30
l^r
3
UTH-H UTH-E
NJ
METHOD
BEttZEME BEHVAL1 BENVAL2 CADMIUM CADVAL
279.00
280.00
281.00
282.00
283.00
284.00
285.00
286.00
287.00
268.00
269.00
290.00
291.00
292.00
293.00
294.00
295.00
296.00
297.00
298.00
299.00
300.00
301.00
302.00
303.00
304.00
305.00
306.00
307.00
308.00
309.00
310.00
311.00
312.00
313.00
4489.00
4469.00
4469.00
4489.00
4489.00
4489.00
4489.00
4469.00
4489.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4469.00
4491.00
4491 .00
4491.00
4491 .00
4491.00
4491.00
4491.00
4491.00
4491.00
4491.00
4491.00
4493.00
4493.00
4493.00
4493.00
4493.00
4493.00
4493.00
4493.00
4493.00
4493.00
4495.00
545.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
567.00
569.00
559.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
567.00
569.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
567.00
569.00
551.00
2.33
8.20
9.42
6.37
5.09
2.22
7.63
7.16
6.88
8.64
3.24
7.14
1.49
10.06
7.58
12.34
8.33
2.28
2.72
8.98
10.00
3.17
1.31
0.58
5.75
8.24
2.39
3.61
4.74
6.21
10.36
5.96
1.78
0.31
1.37
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
2
3
2
2
:
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
2
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
2
2
2
1
2
1
3
2
3
2
1
1
2
3
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
2
3
2
1
1
1
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
FORMAL-
DEHYDE FOBHVAL
0 0.890
0 2.860
0 3.250
0 2.270
0 1.830
0 0.840
0 2.670
0 2.520
0 2.430
0 3.000
0 1.200
0 2.510
0 0.590
0 3.450
0 2.660
0 4.170
0 2.900
0 0.880
0 1.030
0 3.110
0 3.430
0 1.180
0 0.520
0 0.250
0 2.050
0 2.870
0 0.910
0 1.330
0 1.720
0 2.200
0 3.550
0 2.130
0 0.700
0 0.130
0 0.540
DICHLORO-
L METHANE
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.120
0.440
0.500
0.340
0.270
0.120
0.410
0.380
0.370
0.460
0.170
0.380
0.080
0.540
0.400
0.660
0.440
0.120
0.150
0.480
0.530
0.170
0.070
0.030
0.310
0.440
0.130
0.190
0.250
0.330
0.550
0.320
0.090
0.020
0.070
DCMVAL
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
PERCMLORO-
ETHYLENE PERCVAL
1.350
760
460
690
950
290
430
150
990
000
880
140
0.870
5.840
4.400
7.150
4.830
1.320
1.580
5.200
5.800
1.850
0.760
0.340
3.330
4.780
1.380
2.090
2.740
3.610
6.000
3.460
1.020
0.180
0.790
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
1
1
1
1 "BENVAL" (also CADVAL, FORMVAL, DCMVAL and PERCVAL) means the mapping value applied to each grid cell, which corresponds to the emissions
density range (in tons per year).
2 "NJ METHOD BENVAL" is the population-based value for comparison with the NY VMT-based value generated for the Staten Island grid cells only.
-------
1 "BENVAL" (also CADVAL, FORHVAL, DCMVAL and PERCVAL) means the mapping value applied to each grid cell, which corresponds to the emissions
Table 111-5-40. continued: Happing values (shading) for the area and mobile source emissions density maps Figures III-5-21. 22, 24, 26, 28, and 30
Mapping values, ranges in tons/year: 0 = 0, 1 = >0 to <5, 2 = >5 to <10, 3 = >10 to £15, 4 = >15 to <20, 5 = >20 to <30. 6 = >30
PERCHLORO-
ETHYLEME PERCVAL
4.400
3.450
4.500
4.830
2.160
5.090
8.290
3.640
3.820
2.440
0.070
1.090
0.840
2.870
3.960
3.300
4.060
4.280
6.490
8.340
13.830
11.320
4.540
0.000
0.080
1.510
1.890
2.250
1.450
1.670
2.720
3.210
5.010
5.730
8.750
314.00
315.00
316.00
317.00
318.00
319.00
320.00
321.00
322.00
323.00
324.00
325.00
326.00
327.00
328.00
329.00
330.00
331.00
332.00
333.00
334.00
335.00
336.00
337.00
338.00
339.00
340.00
341 .00
342.00
343.00
344.00
345.00
346.00
347.00
348.00
UTM-H
4495.00
4495.00
4495.00
4495.00
4495.00
4495.00
4495.00
4495.00
4495.00
4495.00
4497.00
4497.00
4497.00
4497.00
4497.00
4497.00
4497.00
4497.00
4497.00
4497.00
4497.00
4497.00
4497.00
4497.00
4499.00
4499.00
4499.00
4499.00
4499.00
4499.00
4499.00
4499.00
4499.00
4499.00
4499.00
UTH-E
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561 .00
563.00
565.00
567.00
569.00
571.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
567.00
569.00
57T.CO
573.00
547.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
567.00
BEMZEHE
7.59
5.96
7.75
8.33
3.73
8.76
14.31
6.2?
6.59
4.21
0.12
1.88
1.45
4.95
6.83
5.69
7.00
7.39
11.18
14.38
23.86
19.54
7.82
0.01
0.15
2.61
3.26
3.87
2.49
2.87
4.71
5.53
8.64
9.88
15.08
BENVAL1
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
5
4
2
2
2
2
4
NJ
METHOD
BENVAL2
2
2
2
2
1
2
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
5
4
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
4
CAOHIUH
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0,000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.010
0.010
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
CADVAL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FORMAL-
DEHYDE FORHVAL
2.660
2.130
2.710
2.900
1.370
3.040
4.760
2.220
2.340
1.540
0.060
0.730
0.570
1.790
2.420
2.030
2.470
2.600
3.800
4.800
7.710
6.370
2.740
0.000
0.070
0.990
.210
.440
0.940
.080
.700
.990
3.000
3.390
5.010 J
DICHLORO-
KETHANE
1 0.410
t 0.320
\ O.MO
0.440
0.200
0.470
0.760
0.340
0.350
0.220
0.010
0.100
0.080
0.260
0.360
0.300
0.370
0.390
0.600
0.770
1.270
1.040
0.420
0.000
0.010
0.140
0.170
0.210
0.130
0.150
0.250
0.300
0.460
0.530
I 0.800
Density range (in tons per year). _.-_.., ,
"MJ METHOD MNWAL" is the population-based value for conparison with the MY VHT-based value generated for the Staten Island grid cells only.
-------
T
NJ
Table Ml-5-40. continued: Mapping values (shading) for the area and mobile source emissions density naps Figures 111-5-21, 22, 24, 26, 28, and 30
Mapping values, ranges in tons/year: 0 = 0, 1 = >0 to <5. 2 = >5 to <10, 3 = >10 to «15, 4 = >15 to <20, 5 = >20 to <30, 6 = >30
3
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
MJ
METHOD
349.00
350.00
351.00
352.00
353.00
354.00
355.00
356.00
357.00
356.00
359.00
360.00
361.00
362.00
363.00
364.00
365.00
366.00
367.00
368.00
369.00
370.00
371.00
372.00
373.00
374.00
375.00
376.00
UTH-H
4499.00
4499.00
4499.00
4501.00
4501.00
4501.00
4501.00
4501 .00
4501.00
4501.00
4501.00
4501.00
4501 .00
4501.00
4501.00
4501.00
4503.00
4503.00
4503.00
4503.00
4503.00
4503.00
4503.00
4503.00
4503.00
4505.00
4505.00
4505.00
UTH-E
569.00
571.00
573.00
549.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561. DC
563.00
565.00
567.00
569.00
571.00
573.00
551.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
559.00
561.00
563.00
565.00
567.00
553.00
555.00
557.00
BENZENE B
21.85
0.64
0.01
0.24
3.99
4.60
3.50
3.71
3.51
5.81
7.68
9.09
10.09
5.93
0.00
0.00
0.37
4.05
5.26
5.35
3.64
5.17
4.26
3.41
1.91
0.23
2.80
1.23
EHVAL' BEHVAL" CADHIUH CADVAL
5
1
1
2
2
2
3
2
0
0
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
2
0
0
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
0.010
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
FORMAL- DICHLOftO-
DEHYDE FORHVAL METHANE DCHVAL
7.060 2 1.170
0.260 1 0.030
0.000 0 0.000
0.100 1 0.010
1.470 1 0.210
1.670
1.300
1.360
1.30D
2.080
2.690
3.140
3.460
2.120
0.000
0.000
0.160
1.490
1.690
1.930
1.340
1.870
1.570
1.270
0.740
0.100
1.060
0.250
0.190
0,200
0.190
0.310
0.410
0.480
0.540
0.320
0.000
0.000
0.020
0.220
0.280
0.290
0.190
0.280
0.230
0.180
0.100
0.010
0.150
0.480 1 0.070
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
PERCHLORO-
ETHYLENE
12.660
0.370
0.010
0.140
2.320
2.670
2.030
2.140
2.040
3.370
4.450
5.270
5.860
3.440
0.000
0.000
0.210
2.340
3.050
3.090
2.110
3.000
2.480
1.970
1.110
0.140
1.620
0.720
1 "BENVAL" (also CADVAL, FORHVAL, DCHVAL and PERCVAL) means the mapping value applied to each grid cell, which corresponds to the emissions
density range (in tons per year).
2 HMJ METHOD BENVAL" is the population-based value for comparison with the NY VMT-based value generated for the Staten Island grid cells only.
-------
SOURCE IDENTIFICATION APPENDICES
A-212
-------
SOURCE IDENTIFICATION APPENDIX A -
INITIAL POLLUTANT ROSE ANALYSIS
6A.1 Initial Pollutant Rose Analysis
The initial pollutant rose analyses were limited to four
project sites and 12 volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This
selection of sites and pollutants is consistent with the data
analysis performed by the Data Management Subcommittee and the
Exposure/Health Assessment Subcommittee. The locations of the
four sampling sites and the Newark Airport meteorological site
are depicted in Map III-6-1.
The full two years of data were used when available. In
general, most of the sites had a complete two-year data set for
the VOCs.
6A.2 Initial Pollutant Rose Analysis - Results
6A.2.1 Benzene (Figures III-6A-1 through 4)
TRAVIS - Highest concentrations occurred during north winds.
Concentrations were lowest when winds were from an easterly
quadrant, especially southeast.
PUMP STATION - Highest concentrations occurred during
southeasterly and southerly winds, with lowest on northwest and
northeasterly winds. This site showed a trend toward higher
concentrations with southerly quadrant winds, lower on winds from
the north quadrant.
BAYLEY SETON - Highest concentrations were recorded during
periods of north, northeast and southwesterly winds. Levels were
lower when winds blew from the east and southeast.
CARTERET - Highest concentrations occurred with winds from
the northwest and southwest, lowest on northeasterly winds.
SYNOPSIS - Generally, concentrations were highest on winds
from a northerly quadrant, and lowest when winds were east or
southeast. However, the Pump Station showed the opposite:
highest concentrations when winds were from the southeast;
lowest, on northerly winds.
A-213
-------
6A.2.2 Toluene (Figures III-6A-5 through 8)
TRAVIS - Concentrations were highest on winds from north and
south, lowest with east and southeasterly winds.
PUMP STATION - Highest concentrations were associated with
southerly winds; lower, with northwesterly winds; and lowest,
with winds from the northeast.
BAYLEY SETON - Highest concentrations occurred on northerly
winds; lowest, with winds from southeast and east.
CARTERET - Highest concentrations were linked with
southwesterly winds; lowest, with easterly and northeasterly.
SYNOPSIS - Area-wide concentrations were highest when winds
blew from the north quadrant, and generally lowest when winds had
an easterly component. At the Pump Station, however,
concentrations were highest on southerly winds, and lower with
winds from the north. Wind direction versus concentration
patterns for benzene and toluene were similar, suggesting similar
source areas for both of these pollutants. Vehicular exhaust and
refineries are among the potential sources. More comprehensive
analyses which make use of the emission inventories are presented
in the Pollutant Rose - Enhanced Analysis section.
6A.2.3 m-, p.-Xylene (Figures III-6A-9 through 12)
TRAVIS - Highest concentrations occurred when winds were
from the north; lowest, on winds from the easterly quadrant.
PUMP STATION - Highest levels were recorded with winds from
the south and southeast; lowest, from the northwest.
BAYLEY SETON - Concentrations were lowest when winds were
from the east; relationships between wind direction and high
concentrations were not apparent.
CARTERET - Concentrations were highest with winds from the
southwest, and lowest on northeast and easterly winds.
SYNOPSIS - The predominant pattern of higher concentrations
with winds from the northerly sector continues with m-, p-xylene,
with lowest levels on east and southeasterly winds. Once more,
though, this is not the case for the Pump Station.
A-214
-------
6A.2.4 o-Xylene (Figures III-6A-13 through 16)
TRAVIS - Northerly winds were associated with concentrations
twice as high as the next highest direction. Lowest values
occurred on southeasterly winds.
PUMP STATION - Highest concentrations were observed on winds
from the south and southeast. Lowest levels occurred when the
wind blew from the northwest.
BAYLEY SETON - Peak concentrations were associated with
winds from the north and southwest; lower concentrations, from
the west; and lowest, with winds from the easterly quadrant.
CARTERET - Highest concentrations were linked with winds
from the north counterclockwise through southwest. Lowest
concentrations occurred on northeast winds,
SYNOPSIS - In general, concentrations of o-xylene were
lowest when the wind was from the easterly quadrant. At the Pump
Station, however, highest concentrations were associated with
south to southeasterly winds. Lowest levels (except for the Pump
Station) were observed with winds having an easterly component.
6A.2.5 Hexane (Figures III-6A-17 through 18)
BAYLEY SETON - Highest concentrations were reported for
periods of north, northeast, and southwest through northwest
winds, with a drop in concentration on westerly winds. Lowest
concentrations were coupled with southeasterly winds.
CARTERET - Highest concentrations occurred on winds from the
north through southwest, with a drop in concentration from the
west, however. Lowest levels were observed on northeast winds.
SYNOPSIS - For both sites, lowest concentrations were
associated with winds from an easterly quadrant; highest
concentrations, from a westerly quadrant. This could indicate
the presence of a local source. Hexane was sampled at only two
of the four project sites chosen for analysis.
6A.2.6 Ethylbenzene (Figures III-6A-19 through 21)
TRAVIS - Higher concentrations were observed on north and
south winds, generally; and lowest, on southeasterly winds.
BAYLEY SETON - similar to the Travis profile, peak
concentrations at this site occurred with winds from the north;
lowest, from the southeast.
A-215
-------
SYNOPSIS - Highest concentrations were linked with north
winds; lowest concentrations were connected with southeast winds.
Data from the Pump Station site were insufficient to identify
concentration versus wind direction trends.
6A.2.7 Carbon tetrachloride (Figures III-6A-22 through 25)
TRAVIS - Concentrations were somewhat higher on
southwesterly wind directions, and lowest when the wind blew from
the northeast, southeast, and northwest.
PUMP STATION - Concentrations were highest with south and
southwesterly winds, lowest with north and northwesterly winds.
BAYLEY SETON - While high concentrations occurred with
several wind directions, lowest concentrations were associated
with east and southeasterly breezes.
CARTERET - Highest concentrations were coupled with
southwesterly winds; levels were lowest when the wind blew from
the northeast.
SYNOPSIS - Patterns in wind direction versus concentration
are not as obvious for carbon tetrachloride as they were for many
of the aromatic compounds. Lowest concentrations do appear to be
linked with winds from an easterly quadrant, however. Other
monitoring sites have exhibited well-defined concentration peaks;
these sites are identified and examined in the Pollutant Rose -
Enhanced Analysis section.
6A.2.8 Chloroform (Figures III-6A-26 through 29)
TRAVIS - Highest concentrations were associated with
southwesterly winds; winds from the northeast and southeast were
linked to the lowest concentrations.
PUMP STATION - Concentrations were highest when winds were
from the south; the lowest concentrations occurred when winds
were westerly.
BAYLEY SETON - Highest concentrations were spread from the
north to southwest, while lowest values were connected with
easterly quadrant winds.
CARTERET - There is a slight connection between high
concentrations and southeasterly winds; no pattern was readily
discernible for the lowest concentrations.
SYNOPSIS - There does not seem to be any well-defined area-
wide wind direction versus concentration pattern. Local sources
A-216
-------
may affect the ambient air concentrations of chloroform much more
than does the prevailing wind direction.
6A.2.9 Trichloroethylene (Figures III-6A-30 through 33)
TRAVIS - Highest concentrationsn-lh38XaeEeciated with north
and northeast winds; values were lowest when winds blew from the
southeast.
PUMP STATION - Highest concentrations were linked with
southeasterly winds; and lowest values, with easterly winds. The
southwest and northeast directions yielded relatively high
concentrations.
BAYLEY SETON - Concentrations associated with all directions
were low (<0.10 ppb); but highest on winds from.the north and
northwest, and lowest on southeast winds.
CARTERET - Extremely low concentrations (between 0.02 and
0.07 ppb) were associated with all directions.
SYNOPSIS - In general, this contaminant was present at very
low concentrations throughout the project area. Generally,
highest levels were from the north and northwest, with lowest
readings from the easterly quadrant. The Pump Station continued
to show the opposite profile.
6A.2.10 Tetrachloroethylene (Figures III-6A-34 through 37)
TRAVIS - Highest concentrations occurred on north, east, and
south winds, with lower values associated with westerly winds.
PUMP STATION - Concentrations appeared to be much higher
here than at the other sites. Highest levels were observed on
northeasterly winds; lowest concentrations (an order of magnitude
lower) were linked with winds from the northwest.
BAYLEY SETON - Twin peaks of high concentrations were noted
with winds from the north and south; concentrations for the other
directions are similar to one another.
CARTERET - Highest concentrations are connected with east
and southeast winds; concentrations for the other directions were
similar to one another, ranging between .07 and .15 ppb.
SYNOPSIS - No well-defined patterns or relationships between
the four sites are easily discernable. It appears that local
sources of this contaminant (e.g., dry-cleaners) are at the root
of the observed higher concentrations. Concentrations at the
A-217
-------
Pump Station are on the order of five times the levels at other
sites.
6A.2.11 Dichloromethane (Figures III-6A-38 through 40)
TRAVIS - Strong peaks were associated with north and south
winds; levels were lowest on southeast winds.
PUMP STATION - North and south wind directions yielded the
highest concentrations, while the east and southeast directions
yielded the lowest. While this pattern is consistent with that
observed for this compound at other sites, it is at odds with
profiles at this site for other VOCs—i.e., highest
concentrations linked with east and southeast winds.
SYNOPSIS - North and south winds produced the highest
concentrations at both sites; southeast winds were connected with
the lowest values. This is consistent with data for other VOCs
at Travis; however it is not consistent with respect to the Pump
Station. Data from Carteret and Bayley Seton were not used in
this analysis; they were rejected for Quality Assurance reasons.
The Pollutant Rose - Enhanced Analysis section presents an
emission inventory analysis of a different monitoring site (Port
Richmond) which exhibited a major concentration peak.
A-218
-------
6A.3 Summary Tables for Initial Pollutant Rose Results
Table I1I-6A-1: Summary of initial pollutant rose results
SITE - HIGH DIRECTION
Benzene
Toluene
m,p xylene
o xylene
Hexane
Ethylbenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Trichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Dichloromethane
Carteret
NU/SU
SU
SU
N TO SU
N TO SU
MA
SU
SE
-
E/SE
NA
Travis
N
N/S
N
N
NA
N/S
SU
SU
N
N/E/S
N/S
Pump Sta
SE/S
S
S/SE
S/SE
NA
-
s/su
S
SE
NE
N/S
Bay. Set.
N/NE/SU
N
N/SU
N TO SU
N/NU
N/S
N/NU/E
SITE - LOW DIRECTION
Benzene
Toluene
m,p-xylene
o xylene
Hexane
Ethylbenzene
Carbon Tetrachloride
Chloroform
Trichloroethylene
Tetrachloroethylene
Dichloromethane
Key to Symbols:
Carteret
NE
E/NE
NE/E
NE
NE
NA
NE
NA
Pump Sta. Bay. Set.
E/SE
SE/E
E
E
SE
SE
E/SE
E
SE
NA
N
NE
E
SE
NA
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
SOUTHEAST
S * SOUTH
SU * SOUTHWEST
U * WEST
NU » NORTHWEST
* DATA NOT AVAILABLE
« NO APPARENT TREND
A-219
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-1
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
PS 26, TRAVIS
BENZENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
*$ SOUTHEAST
£
Q
•g SOUTH
§
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-220
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-2
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
PUMP STATION
BENZENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
*= SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST 4=^
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/88 thai September/89
A-221
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-3
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, SI
BENZENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
T; SOUTHEAST
-a
I
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thai September/89
A-222
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-4
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
CARTERET, NEW JERSEY
BENZENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
*= SOUTHEAST
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-5
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
PS 26, TRAVIS
TOLUENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
*t SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
i—i—i i
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5 5.5 6
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-224
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-6
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
PUMP STATION
TOLUENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
*= SOUTHEAST
0>
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0 0.7 1.4 2.1 2.8 3.5 4.2 4.9 5.6 6.3 7
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/88 thru September/89
A-225
-------
b
FIGURE III - 6A_7
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, SI
TOLUENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
c
=§ SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST :^
NORTHWEST
0123456789 10
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-226
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-8
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
CARTERET, NEW JERSEY
TOLUENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
'•X SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
o
0.6 1.2 1.8 2.4 3 3.6 4.2 4.8 5.4 6
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-227
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-9
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
PS 26. TRAVIS
M. P - XYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
•K SOUTHEAST
NORTHWEST
1.81
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-228
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-10
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
PUMP STATION
M/P XYLENE
NORTH
o
0)
b
c
NORTHEAST
EAST
SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6 4
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/88 thai September/89
A-229
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-11
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, SI
M/P XYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
•X SOUTHEAST
1
b
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.7 3
Concentration (ppb)
Data: February/88 thru September/89
A-230
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-12
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
CARTERET, NEW JERSEY
M. P - XYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
tt SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
Concentration (ppb)
Data- October/87 thru September/89
A-231
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-13
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
P.S. 26, TRAVIS
0-XYtENE
O
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
£ SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (ppb)
Data- October/87 thru September/89
A-232
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-14
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
PUMP STATION
O-XYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
O
•ft SOUTHEAST
I
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (ppb)
Data- October/88 thru September/89
A-233
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-15
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE*
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, SI
0-XYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
b
E
o
•X SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-234
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-16
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
CARTERET, NEW JERSEY
O-XYLENE
o
0)
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
'•*= SOUTHEAST -~
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.37
0,45
0.38
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-235
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-17
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, SI
HEXANE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
=£ SOUTHEAST
0)
Q
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thai September/89
A-236
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-18
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
CARTERET, NJ
HEXANE
o
0>
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (ppb)
October/1987 thru September/1989
A-237
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-L9
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
PS 26, TRAVIS
ETHYLBENZENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
•g SOUTHEAST
I
b
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.0 1
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-238
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-20
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
BA YLEY SETON HOSPITAL, SI
ETHYL BENZENE
NORTH !
NORTHEAST
EAST
TI SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
.o
IP
I
b
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Conceniration (ppb)
Data: January/88 thru September/89
A-239
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-21
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
PUMP STATION
ETHYLBENZENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
O
*= SOUTHEAST
0)
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0,47
0.19
0.56
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/88 thru March/89
A-240
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-22
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
PS 26, TRAVIS
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
= SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
Concentration (ppb)
October/1987 thru September/1989
A-241
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-23
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
PUMP STATION
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
*5 SOUTHEAST
0)
^
b
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.05
0.07
0.09
0.13
0.13
-j—i—i—i—i—i i . i
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/88 thru September/89
A-242
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-24
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, SI
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
c
o
•tt SOUTHEAST
I
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-243
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-25
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
CARTERET, NEW JERSEY
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
SOUTHEAST
w
b
"g SOUTH I
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.11
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.09
0.12
i—i—i—i i.i.i
0. 0 0 0. 0
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-244
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-26
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE-
PS 26, TRAVIS
CHLOROFORM
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
tt SOUTHEAST
0.06
0.07
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.09
0.10
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
Concentration (ppb)
0.25
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-245
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-27
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
PUMP STATION
CHLOROFORM
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
^ SOUTHEAST
CD
b
"5 SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.12
0.10
0.15
0.13
0.25
0.12
0.08
0.12
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6.0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Concentration (ppb)
Data- October/88 thru September/89
A-246
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-28
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, SI
CHLOROFORM
o
0>
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
^ SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
1 " 1 1 1 i L_ __J
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-247
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-29
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
CARTERET, NEW JERSEY
CHLOROFORM
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
~ SOLTTHEAST I
0.01
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.04
0.03
0.02
*
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-248
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-30
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
PS26, TRAVIS
TR1CHLOROETHYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
=g SOUTHEAST
I
b
"g SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.03
0.01
0.05
0.04
0.04
0.04
-J L .
J 1 L
o> 0
Concentration (ppb)
October/1987 thru Saptember/1989
A-249
-------
FIGURE III -- 6A-31
o
b
i
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
PUMP STATION
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Concentration (ppb)
Data; October/88 thai June/89
A-250
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-32
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, SI
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
'-X SOUTHEAST
0.10
0.06
o
1
o
T5
0.03
0.01
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.05
0.08
0.10
i — i — i
. i , i . i
Conceni ration (ppb)
Dala: October/87 tfvu September/89
A-251
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-33
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
CARTERET, NEW JERSEY
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
75 SOUTHEAST
Q>
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-252
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-34
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
PS 26, TRAVIS
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
•K SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
O
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-25 3
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-35
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
PUMP STATION
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
5 SOUTHEAST
NORTHWEST
0 0.4 0.8 1.2 1.6 2 2.4 2.8 3.2 3.6
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/88 thru September/89
A-254
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-36
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, SI
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
~ SOUTHEAST
£
b
"2 SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.35
0.31
0.25
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-25 5
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-37
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
CARTERET, NEW JERSEY
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
=g SOUTHEAST
o
Q
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
Concentration (ppb)
Data; October/87 thru September/89
A-256
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-38
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
PS 26 . TRAVIS
DICHLOROMETHANE
b
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-257
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-39
A
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
PUMP STATION
DICHLOROMETHANE
o
=§
o
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
SOUTHEAST
SOUTH
SOUTHWEST
WEST
NORTHWEST
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Concentration (ppb)
Data: October/88 thru September/89
A-258
-------
FIGURE III - 6A-40
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, SI
DICHLOROMETHANE
NORTH
NORTHEAST
EAST
O
•« SOUTHEAST
O
-------
SOURCE IDENTIFICATION APPENDIX B -
SOURCE IDENTIFICATION POLLUTANT ROSE ANALYSES NOT DISCUSSED IN
SECTION 6.3, AND
POLLUTANT ROSE BAR CHARTS FOR POLLUTANT ROSES A THROUGH I
6B.1 Pollutant Rose B - Benzene. Year 2 (Map III-6B-1)
The relationship between east/southeast winds and low
concentrations (lack of sources) is once again observed in the
data set for year 2. There are some differences from year 1 to
year 2, however:
the southeast wind peak at Elizabeth from the previous
year is absent;
the north wind peak at Eltingville is gone, and
replaced by a slight south wind peak (1.81 ppb); and
the Carteret peak on east winds is missing, and is
replaced by a northeast peak (2.06 ppb) that was not
observed in year 1.
Explanations for these differences are not readily apparent,
especially since yearly emission inventories that highlight
emission changes were not available for the project. However,
the differences could be inherent in the limited nature of the
analysis; these roses incorporate only one year of data in which
some wind directions are represented fewer than 5 times, and
others, not at all.
6B.2 Pollutant Rose D - Toluene. Year 2 (Map III-6B-2)
Again, low concentration was associated with east and
southeast winds. The association of high concentration with
southwest winds at Carteret observed in year 1 is gone, and the
relationship between high concentration and north winds at
Eltingville has vanished. Instead, at Eltingville, there is a
pronounced peak associated with south winds (average
concentration 5.06 ppb). High concentrations vs. southwest winds
at Elizabeth were observed.
6B.2.1 Eltingville, south sector
The south wind peak (5.06) at Eltingville was investigated
using the micro and point source inventories.
A-260
-------
There are no sources to the south of the Eltingville monitor in
either the micro or point source inventories.
The only source identified is the Oakwood Beach POTW (east of the
monitor, toluene emissions of 0.22 tpy).
As for year 1 toluene, mobile sources are the most likely
cause of the toluene concentration at the monitor. Richmond
Parkway, oriented north-south, runs close to the monitoring site.
6B.2.2 Elizabeth, southwest sector
The southwest wind peak (4.77 ppb) at Elizabeth was
investigated using the micro and point source inventories.
The micro inventory lists several gas stations to the southwest
of the monitor: Exxon, Amoco Gas, and Hertz Penske gas station.
The point source inventory for toluene lists the following in the
southwest sector:
Source
General Motors Corp.
Safety Clean Corp.
Merck and Company
Middlesex County POTW
Essex/Union County POTW
Rahway Valley POTW
Middlesex County,SA POTW
El Dupont & Co.
Midatlantic Container Corp,
Emissions
tpy
107.1
65.91
46.50
46.02
15.77
13.66
10.41
9.61
5.79
Distance
km
5.9
5.7
6.5
23.7
1.7
7.2
19.4
23.7
4.2
An examination of this emissions versus distance table
reveals the connection between toluene concentration and
industrial/chemical sources nearby. Mobile sources make a
contribution, but the mobile/area source mapping inventory does
not quantify emissions for toluene. The emissions of the
Essex/Union County POTW, combined with its short distance from
the monitor (<2 km) suggests that it, too, contributes to high
concentrations at the monitor during periods of southwest winds.
6B.3 Pollutant Rose E - 1.1.1-trichloroethane (Map III-6B-3)
The concentration of 1,1,1-trichloroethane at Port Richmond,
New York, on northeast winds is nearly twice the concentration of
the next highest direction (1.14 ppb versus 0.65 ppb with north
A-261
-------
and east winds). For each of the other sites, the variation of
concentration with wind direction is less pronounced.
There is a large cluster of sources to the northeast of the
Port Richmond monitor. Most notable are the Port Richmond POTW
and Antique Brass Works. The latter source is probably
insignificant, but it is located only one block northeast of the
monitor. The cluster also includes several auto refinishing
facilities, but the inventory does not address emissions data for
this chemical from these sources.
The point source inventory for 1,1,1-trichloroethane lists the
following in the northeast sector:
Source Emissions Distance
tpy km
P.O. Oil/Chemical Storage 67.14 3.0
Owls Head POTW 35.29 6.6
Rasko 16.22 12.4
Gordon Terminal Svce. Co. 14.45 2.7
Edison Price, Inc. 10.53 19.1
Newtown Creek POTW 7.26 16.5
Simplex Ceiling Corp. 7.00 12.7
Bayonne POTW 1.89 2.5
Port Richmond POTW 1.03 1.2
High concentrations are associated with POTWs and industrial
point and area sources. The use of 1,1,1-trichloroethane as a
degreaser and industrial solvent could explain these source
listings.
6B.4 Pollutant Rose G - Chloroform (Map III-6B-4)
The pollutant rose for Travis, New York, reveals the
relationship between higher concentrations of chloroform and
south to southwesterly winds (0.11 with south winds, 0.14 with
southwest winds).
In the microinventory, three sources are located within 1 km
to the south and southwest of the Travis monitor. These are the
Con Edison powerplant, Fresh Kills Landfill, and the Fresh Kills
Marine Plant.
The point source inventory for chloroform lists the
following sources in the combined south/southwest sectors:
A-262
-------
Source Emissions Distance
tpy km
Akzo Chemicals, Inc. 2.75 18.7
Middlesex County,SA POTW 0.69 12.0
Middlesex County POTW 0.63 19.4
Somerset-Raritan Valley POTW 0.27 31.5
New Brunswick, POTW 0.12 25.9
Perth Amboy POTW 0.04 11.3
Old Bridge POTW 0.03 13.8
Woodbridge POTW #1 0.02 5.3
Carteret POTW 0.02 1.4
Woodbridge POTW #2 0.01 11.7
These inventories are indicative of three differing sources
of chloroform: chemical plants, POTWs, and the Fresh Kills
Landfill. The proximity of the landfill to the Travis monitor
and the likelihood that chloroform is emitted from the landfill
implicate it as the primary contributor to impact.
6B.5 Pollutant Rose H - Carbon Tetrachloride (Map III-6B-5)
The Carteret rose shows a uniformity of concentration versus
wind direction with a range of only 0.12 to 0.15 ppb. The higher
concentration is associated with southwesterly winds. The
Elizabeth depiction is similar, the low concentration versus east
and southeasterly winds is apparent, the highest concentration
values of 0.16 and 0.15 ppb matches up with south and southwest
winds, respectively. There is more variability in the Sewaren
rose. Concentrations of carbon tetrachloride are 35% and 29%
higher than the next high direction when winds are south (0.23
ppb) and southwest (0.22 ppb), respectively. Finally, at
Tottenville, well defined concentration peaks are linked with
southwest and south wind directions (0.27 ppb and 0.21 ppb,
respectively).
6B.5.1 Sewaren, south/southwest sectors
The south and southwest peaks at Sewaren were investigated
using the micro and point source inventories.
Three sources are listed in the microinventory in terms of
total VOCs. These are Shell oil Co., Royal Petroleum, and CP
Chemical. Little, if any, carbon tetrachloride is emitted from
any of these sources.
The point source inventory for carbon tetrachloride lists
the following in the south/southwest sector:
A-263
-------
Source Emissions Distance
tpy km
Hercules, Inc. 447.74 13.6
Middlesex County POTW 1.23 13.7
Middlesex County,SA POTW 0.27 8.7
Perth Amboy POTW 0.02 6.6
Woodbridge POTW #1 0.01 1.3
The major source here is Hercules, Inc., with emissions of
carbon tetrachloride registering two orders of magnitude higher
than the next ranked source. POTWs constitute all remaining
sources in this portion of the point source inventory, but their
extremely low emissions suggests a minimal, if not negligible,
contribution to the high concentrations registered at the Sewaren
monitor.
68.5.2 Tottenville. south/southwest sector
The south and southwest peaks at Tottenville was
investigated using the micro and point source inventories.
In the microinventory, four sources were identified, each
with very low or zero emissions of carbon tetrachloride. These
sources are ASM Cleaners (located two blocks from monitor),
Tottenville Bakery & Pastry Shop, and two school boilers.
The point source inventory for carbon tetrachloride lists the
following in the south/southwest sector:
Source Emissions Distance
tpy km
Hercules, Inc. 447.74 11.0
Middlesex County POTW 1.23 13.7
Middlesex County,SA POTW 0.27 3.9
Perth Amboy POTW 0.02 3.7
As for Sewaren, high concentrations observed at Tottenville
when winds were from the south and southwest were associated with
its location downwind from Hercules, Inc.
A-264
-------
MAP III - 6B-1: ROSE B, BENZENE YEAR 2
A- MWADA HESS
1- EXXON BATUAT REFINERY
C- MULS AMERICA, INC.
D- ESSEX/UNION POTU
E- LINOEN/DQSELLE POTU
F- MERCX t CO.
G- OIIIS PRODUCTS CORP.
X- SHELL OIL CO.
I- SPENCER KEUCCG PRODUCTS
J- TIOT CHEMICAL CORP.
A-265
-------
MAP III - 6B-2: ROSE D, TOLUENE YEAR 2
A-266
-------
MAP III - 6B-3: ROSE E, TRICHLOROETHANE
uecurr CMP . or MWUCA
00*1 FINISHING i (ESCMCN
EXXON UYUUr REFINEIT
GORDON rEMIIUl SVCZ. CO.
NIOOLESEX COWTY fmi «1
P.O. OIL I CXCMICM. STOM4Z [HC
sima ctaiws '
TOPCO. IMC.
11.61
10.00
5.00
14.45
12.35
67. K
7.00
6.50
1.09
61.13
7.26
35.29
16.22
MIDDLESEX COUNTY TOTU «
Olf EK POTU
wts HEW ram
A-267
-------
MAP III - 6B-4: ROSE G, CHLOROFORM
ALLIED SIGNAL. INC. 4.00
GOUXW TEWIIUL SHVId CO. Z.5J
ESSBCAMION POTU 1.50
P.O. OIL I CHEMICAL STOUCI, INC. 4.57
NEUTOUN CUEK POTU 2.72
A-268
-------
MAP III - 6B-5: ROSE H, CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
A- EXXON 8ATVMT ttFINHT
»• EtKX/UMIOH POTVI
C- LlHKJ/IOSflU POTU
o- UMMT-vAtLtr SA POTU
E- NEMUUS, INC.
r- NfiiRMi CKBC raru
A-269
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-1
i
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
DONGAN HILLS, NY
BENZENE (YEAR 1)
NORTH (6)
NORTHEAST (2)
EAST (5)
SOUTHEAST (5)
SOUTH (9)
SOUTHWEST (10)
WEST (6)
NORTHWEST (13)
1.76
1.80
1.66
1.52
1.41
1.82
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 56
Data: October/87 thru September/88
A-270
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-2
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
ELIZABETH, NJ
BENZENE (YEAR 1)
NORTH (0)
(0
§ NORTHEAST (0)
ts
O
«*-
o
I
o
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-3
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE-
PORT RICHMOND, NY
BENZENE (YEAR 1)
NORTH (6)
CO
§ NORTHEAST (2)
EAST (4)
SOUTHEAST (5)
SOUTH (4)
SOUTHWEST (6)
WEST (5)
NORTHWEST (11)
1.34
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 43
Data: October/87 thru September/88
A-272
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-4
o
*o
13
.0
to
£
b
73
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
ELTINGVILLE, NY
BENZENE (YEAR 1)
CO
CD
NORTH (6)
w./
§ NORTHEAST (2)
SOUTHWEST (11)
WEST (5)
NORTH WEST (13)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 57
Data: October/87 thru September/88
A-273
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-5
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
CARTERET, NJ
BENZENE (YEAR 1)
NORTH (5)
NORTHEAST (2)
EAST (5)
SOUTHEAST (6)
SOUTH (7)
SOUTHWEST (10)
WEST (8)
NORTH WEST (13)
0.97
1.43
1.57
1.24
i—i
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 56
Data: October/87 thru September/88
A-274
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-6
ffl
0>
JS
o
O
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, NY
BENZENE (YEAR 1)
NORTH (6)
NORTHEAST (2)
1.61
1.33
1.31
1.55
SOUTHWEST (11)
WEST (7)
1.10
NORTH WEST (13)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 56
Data: October/87 thru September/88
A-275
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-7
5
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
DONGAN HILLS, NY
BENZENE (YEAR 2)
NORTH (2)
NORTHEAST (0)
EAST(1)
SOUTHEAST (1)
SOUTH (5)
SOUTHWEST (8)
WEST (6)
NORTHWEST (7)
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 30
Data: October/88 thru September/89
a-276
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-8
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
ELIZABETH, NJ
BENZENE (YEAR 2)
™*
I
"CO
1
O
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-9
(O
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-10
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
ELTINGVILLE, NY
BENZENE (YEAR 2)
NORTH (2)
NORTHEAST (0)
EAST(1)
SOUTHEAST (1)
2 SOUTH (8)
§
SOUTHWEST (8)
WEST (6)
NORTHWEST (6)
1.31
1.81
1.46
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Concentration (ppb)
4.5 5
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS 57
Data: October/88 thru September/89
A-279
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-11
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
CARTERET. NJ
BENZENE (YEAR 2)
SOUTHWEST (12)
WEST (11)
NORTHWEST (8)
1.84
2.06
1.38
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 53
Data: October/88 thru September/89
A-280
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-12
co
§
"•*->
OS
<5
O
«•—
O
Z5
O
£
b
c
^
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
BAYLEYSETON HOSPITAL, NY
BENZENE (YEAR 2)
NORTH (4)
NORTHEAST (1)
EAST (2)
SOUTHEAST (1)
SOUTH (9)
SOUTHWEST (8)
WEST (9)
NORTH WEST (10)
1.30
1.64
1.17
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 44
Data: October/88 thru September/89
A-281
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-13
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
DONGAN HILLS, NY
TOLUENE (YEAR 1)
NORTH (6)
(0
§ NORTHEAST (2)
1&
% EAST (5)
SOUTHEAST (4)
SOUTH (9)
SOUTH WEST (10)
WEST (6)
NORTHWEST (12)
o
£
b
1234567
Concentration (ppb)
8 9 10
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 64
Data: October/87 thru September/88
A-282
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-14
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
ELIZABETH, NJ
TOLUENE (YEAR 1)
ffl
o
"o
O
NORTH (0)
NORTHEAST (0)
EAST (0)
SOUTHEAST (2)
SOUTH {2)
SOUTHWEST (7)
WEST (4)
NORTHWEST (3)
12345678
Concentration (ppb)
9 10
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 18
Data: June/88 thru September/88
A-283
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-15
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
PORT RICHMOND, NY
TOLUENE (YEAR 1)
(0
CD
o
"o
O
£
b
•a
NORTH (6)
§ NORTHEAST (2)
EAST (4)
SOUTHEAST (5)
SOUTH (4)
SOUTHWEST (6)
WEST (5)
NORTHWEST (10)
01234567
Concentration (ppb)
8 9 10
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 42
Data: October/87 thru September/88
A-28A
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-16
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
ELTINGVILLE, NY
TOLUENE (YEAR 1)
CO
i
I
1
o
.2
•s
NORTH (6)
NORTHEAST (2)
SOUTHWEST (11)
WEST (5)
NORTH WEST (12)
01234567
Concentration (ppb)
9.02
8 9 10
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 55
Data: October/87 thru September/88
A-285
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-17
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
CARTERET, NJ
TOLUENE (YEAR 1)
CO
b
I
NORTH (5)
NORTHEAST (2)
EAST (4)
SOUTHEAST (6)
SOUTH (7)
SOUTHWEST (10)
WEST (8)
NORTHWEST (13)
01234567
Concentration (ppb)
8 9 10
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 55
Data: October/87 thru September/88
A-286
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-18
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, NY
TOLUENE (YEAR 1)
o
£
b
c
5
NORTH (6)
NORTHEAST (2)
EAST (5)
SOLTTHEAST (5)
SOUTH (8)
SOUTH WEST (11)
WEST (7)
NORTHWEST (12)
01234567
Concentration (ppb)
8 9 10
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 56
Data: October/87 thai September/88
A-287
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-19
£
b
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
DONGAN HILLS. NY
TOLUENE (YEAR 2)
NORTH (2)
Wrf
g NORTHEAST (0)
EAST (2)
u. SOUTHEAST (1)
I
Z SOUTH (6)
SOUTHWEST (8)
WEST (6)
NORTHWEST (7)
0123456789 10
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 32
Data: October/88 thru September/89
A-288
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-20
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
ELIZABETH, NJ
TOLUENE (YEAR 2)
CO
to
O
I
£
O
NORTH (6)
NORTHEAST (3)
EAST (4)
SOUTHEAST (3)
SOUTH (9)
SOUTHWEST (12)
WEST (11)
NORTH WEST (10)
01234567
Concentration (ppb)
8 9 10
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 58
Data: October/88 thru September/89
A-289
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-21
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE-
PORT RICHMOND, NY
TOLUENE (YEAR 2)
NORTH (4)
(0
NORTHEAST (3)
"3
o
I
o
t5
EAST (4)
SOUTHEAST (3)
SOUTH (10)
SOUTH WEST (11)
WEST (11)
NORTHWEST (8)
01234567
Concentration (ppb)
8 9 10
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 54
Data: October/88 thru September/89
A-290
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-22
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
ELTINGVILLE, NY
TOLUENE (YEAR 2)
CO
i
=5
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-23
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
CARTERET, NJ
TOLUENE (YEAR 2)
8
-Q
O
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-24
CO
CO
CD
o
1
b
E
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
BAYLEY SETON HOSPITAL, NY
TOLUENE (YEAR 2)
NORTH (4)
NORTHEAST (1)
EAST (2)
SOUTHEAST (1)
SOUTH (9)
SOUTHWEST (8)
WEST (9)
NORTH WEST (10)
3.48
3.02
3.32
2.91
0123456789 10
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 44
Data: October/88 thru September/89
A-293
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-25
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
PORT RICHMOND, NY
1,1.1 TRICHLOROETHANE
NORTH (10)
NORTHEAST (5)
EAST (8)
SOUTHEAST (8)
2 SOUTH (14)
•
.1
t> SOUTHWEST (17)
WEST (16)
NORTHWEST (19)
-a
I
0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
Concentration (ppb)
1.5
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 97
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-294
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-26
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
ELIZABETH. NJ
1.1.1 TRICHLOROETHANE
C/5
CO
Q)
NORTH (6)
g NORTHEAST (3)
O
&
b
T3
EAST (4)
SOUTHEAST (5)
SOUTH (11)
SOUTHWEST (19)
WEST (15)
NORTHWEST (13)
0.3 0.6 0.9
Concentration (ppb)
1.2 1.5
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 76
Data: June/88 thru September/89
A-295
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-27
CO
.1
•5
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE*
CARTERET, NJ
1.1.1 TRICHLOROETHANE
I
NORTH (10)
NORTHEAST (4)
EAST (4)
SOUTHEAST (8)
SOUTH (10)
SOUTH WEST (18)
WEST (19)
NORTHWEST (20)
0.55
0.62
0.66
0.53
-J 1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS 93
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-296
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-28
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
SEWAREN, NJ
1.1.1 TRICHLOROETHANE
CO
o
7J
£
Q
T3
NORTH (5)
5 NORTHEAST (3)
EAST (4)
u. SOUTHEAST (2)
SOUTH (6)
SOUTHWEST (9)
WEST (3)
NORTHWEST (5)
0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
Concentration (ppb)
1.5
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 37
Data: January789 thru September/89
A-297
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-29
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
DONGAN HILLS, NY
1.1.1 TRICHLOROETHANE
CO
o
H-
o
NORTH (8)
NORTHEAST (2)
o
£
b
0.45
0.42
SOUTH WEST (17)
WEST (9)
NORTHWEST (20)
0.40
0.30
0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
Concentration (ppb)
1.5
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS 84
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-298
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-30
CO
o5
&
o
=8
£
O
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
PORT RICHMOND, NY
DICHLOROMETHANE
NORTH (10)
NORTHEAST (5)
EAST (8)
SOUTHEAST (8)
SOUTH (14)
SOUTH WEST (17)
WEST (16)
NORTH WEST (19)
I 1 1 1— __i L_ _i
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 97
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-299
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-31
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
PS 26, TRAVIS
DICHLOROMETHANE
NORTH (11)
NORTHEAST (4)
EAST (8)
SOUTHEAST (5)
SOUTH (15)
SOUTHWEST (16)
WEST (16)
NORTHWEST (19)
1.16
1.22
1.30
0.84
0.66
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 94
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-300
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-32
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
PORT RICHMOND, NY
CHLOROFORM
<0
o
«•—
o
NORTH (10)
NORTHEAST (5)
EAST (8)
SOUTHEAST (8)
SOUTH (14)
SOUTHWEST (17)
WEST (16)
NORTHWEST (19)
0.08
0.11
0.09
0.08
0.07
0.07
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2
Concentration (ppb)
0.25 0.3
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 97
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-301
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-33
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE'
PS 26, TRAVIS
CHLOROFORM
CO
o
W
ZJ
o
I
NORTH (11)
NORTHEAST (4)
EAST (8)
SOUTHEAST (5)
SOUTH (15)
SOITTHWEST(16)
WEST (16)
NORTHWEST (19)
0.07
0.14
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25
Concentration (ppb)
0.3
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 94
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-302
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-34
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE-
ELIZABETH, NJ
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
co
0)
s
o
O
••§
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-35
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
CARTERET, NEW JERSEY
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CO
0)
a)
-Q
o
.0
•5
£
b
•a
NORTH (11)
NORTHEAST (5)
EAST (8)
SOUTHEAST (9)
SOUTH (14)
SOUTHWEST (22)
WEST (19)
NORTHWEST (21)
0.14
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.13
0.15
0.12
0.12
J 1 1 1 1 L
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Concentration (ppb)
0.5
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 109
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-304
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-36
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
TOTTENVILLE, NY
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
CO
&
o
0)
.a
o
.h=
O
NORTH (4)
NORTHEAST (3)
EAST (4)
SOUTHEAST (3)
SOUTH (10)
SOUTH WEST (11)
WEST (9)
NORTHWEST (8)
0.08
0.27
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Concentration (ppb)
0.5
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 52
Data: October/88 thru September/89
A-305
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-37
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
SEWAREN, NJ
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-38
CO
I
to
CD
O
"o
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
PORT RICHMOND, NY
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
o
&
b
c
NORTH (9)
NORTHEAST (5)
EAST (5)
SOUTHEAST (7)
SOUTH (10)
SOUTH WEST (12)
WEST (16)
NORTHWEST (18)
0.07
0.02
0.06
0.05
0.08
0.06
0.42
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 82
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-307
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-39
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
PS 26, TRAVIS
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
CO
Q)
o
«•—
o
o
•a
NORTH (10)
NORTHEAST (4)
EAST (5)
SOUTHEAST (4)
SOUTH (11)
SOUTH WEST (11)
WEST (16)
NORTHWEST (18)
0.03
0.06
0.08
0.07
0.09
0.04
0.27
0.28
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Concentration (ppb)
0.5 0.6
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 79
Data: October/87 thru June/89
A-308
-------
o
"o
FIGURE III - 6B-40
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE1
ELIZABETH, NJ
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
o
£
b
•o
NORTH (6)
NORTHEAST (3)
EAST (4)
SOUTHEAST (5)
SOUTH (11)
SOUTH WEST (18)
WEST (13)
NORTH WEST (13)
^l
o.os
0.03
o.oe
o.oe
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6
Concentration (ppb)
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 73
Data: June/88 thru September/89
A-309
-------
FIGURE III - 6B-41
SI/NJ UATAP POLLUTANT "ROSE"
CARTERET, NEW JERSEY
TRICHLOROETHYLENE
NORTH (11)
NORTHEAST (5)
EAST (8)
SOUTHEAST (9)
SOUTH (14)
SOUTHWEST (22)
WEST (19)
NORTHWEST (21)
0.06
0.04
0.08
0.03
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.07
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5
Concentration (ppb)
0.6
TOTAL NUMBER OF OBSERVATIONS: 109
Data: October/87 thru September/89
A-310
-------
SOURCE IDENTIFICATION APPENDIX C -
INITIAL SURFACE TRAJECTORY ANALYSES
6C.1 Introduction
The pollutant/site/date sets selected for the initial back
trajectory analyses included the following:
site locations representative of some more general
section of the overall study area,
both aromatic and chlorinated hydrocarbon pollutants,
cases of peak concentrations and of lower average
concentrations, and
bases for examination of seasonal trends or some other
particular interest.
Six dates were selected for the initial phase of surface
trajectory analysis. S02 concentrations were used in the
analyses to attempt to differentiate chemical/source area
relationships from more general air pollution or air stagnation
periods. The dates and the reasons for their selection are as
follows:
December 3-4, 1988: Aromatic compounds exhibited their
highest (peak) concentrations, while chlorinated
hydrocarbons and S02 did not.
January 22-23, 1989: Concentrations of all the VOCs and S02
exhibited major peaks. In addition, this date marked the
beginning of an extensive air stagnation period in the
northeastern United States.
February 9-10, 1989: This day was unique in that
concentrations of all compounds were very low (valleys).
February 15-16, 1989: On this date, concentrations of
aromatic compounds and S02 were at peaks, while
concentrations for the chlorinated compounds were low.
August 14-15, 1989: This date was similar to February
15-16 with respect to concentration profile (peaks for the
aromatics and S02, low concentrations for the chlorinated
hydrocarbons), but it is a summer day, not winter. This
date is for use in a winter versus summer comparison.
A-311
-------
September 1-2, 1989: All of the chlorinated compounds were
at peak levels, while the aromatics and SO2 exhibited
valleys.
Trajectories for these six periods of time are depicted
graphically in Figures III-6O1 through 6.
This section presents the results of the surface trajectory
analyses on a day-by-day basis, and a summary that compares the
various days. The trajectories are valid from 9 a.m. to 9 a.m.
local time; this was designed to coincide with the 24-hour
sampling period for VOCs.
Results are discussed in terms of aromatics and chlorinated
compounds. While hexane is neither aromatic nor chlorinated, it
followed the concentration patterns exhibited by the aromatics in
this analysis; therefore, the discussion of aromatics in this
section applies to hexane as well.
6C.2 Results
6C.2.1 December 3-4, 1988 (Map III-6C-1)
Synoptic Situation: Zonal air flow at all atmospheric
levels, fast-moving cold front passed project area between
midnight and dawn on the 4th.
Discussion: Consistent with a frontal passage, the surface
winds veered from southwest on the 3rd to a more swift northwest
direction at midnight into the morning of the 4th. This date
featured high concentrations of aromatic hydrocarbons (benzene,
toluene, xylenes) which are attributable, in large part, to
mobile sources. It is probable that highest concentrations
occurred when the winds were from the southwest, since the
passage of the cold front and associated fresh northwest winds
should tend to increase dispersion and minimize concentrations.
This suggests auto emissions from Route 440 to the southwest of
Susan Wagner H.S. as a contributor to the high aromatic compounds
concentrations.
6C.2.2 January 22-23, 1989 (Map III-6O2)
Synoptic Situation: High pressure off the coast of Virginia
and low wind speeds aloft combined to produce a period of air
stagnation over the project area. The worst of the stagnation
occurred after the sampling period, on January 24.
A-312
-------
Discussion: Trajectories for each three-hour interval are
consistently from the southwest, in general from the Perth Amboy
area of New Jersey. All pollutants exhibited major peaks during
this sampling period. This is probably more likely due to the
trapping of pollutant near the surface (inhibiting dispersion)
than transport from a particular direction. For example, on the
24th, the winds were light and quite variable, but the SO2
concentration remained extremely high. Toxic pollutant
concentration data are not available for all sites for the 24th.
6C.2.3 February 9-10, 1989 (Map III-6C-3)
Synoptic Situation: Broad pressure trough in the upper air
over the northeast with a wind shift from northwest to southwest
through the period. This is the first situation in these
analyses of this type of wind shift.
Discussion: This was the so-called valley day, when
concentrations of all pollutants were very low. There were no
frontal passages, and temperatures were uniformly cold. A
connection between meteorology and low concentrations is not
immediately apparent in this trajectory.
6C.2.4 February 15-16, 1989 (Map III-6C-4)
Synoptic Situation: Front passed through just before
beginning of sampling period, rain and drizzle fell during the
morning of the 15th. Wind speeds were low during the sampling
period, shifting from the north early, to a northwesterly
direction later in the sampling period.
Discussion: This scenario featured a trajectory from the
north; this occurred early on. As the front moved further south,
winds backed into the northwest. The pollutant scenario on this
date matches that of December 3-4,1988, in that concentrations of
aromatics and S02 peaked, while chlorinated compound
concentrations were low. A case can be made that the Staten
Island Expressway, to the north of the monitor, acted as a source
of aromatic emissions during the slow northerly airflow early in
the sampling period. It is more difficult to determine why the
chlorinated compounds were at such low levels during this period.
6C.2.5 August 14-15, 1989 (Map III-6C-5)
Synoptic Situation: This day is an example of a summertime
stagnation period. This is borne out by the presence of an upper
ridge off the mid-Atlantic coast. The trajectories also indicate
very variable and slow air flow for each three hour-interval.
A-313
-------
Discussion: Once more it appears that the stagnation, to a
greater extent than any particular source, caused the high
concentrations of aromatics and S02. None of the eight three-
hour trajectories was from the same direction; all directions
were accounted for over the 24-hour period.
6C.2.6 September 1-2, 1989 (Map III-6C-6)
Synoptic Situation: Frontal passage late in sampling
period, wind shifted from south to west-northwest. This is the
first time the southerly wind direction was well-represented in
the trajectories.
Discussion: This situation is unique among the dates
selected in that it is the only one featuring high concentrations
of chlorinated compounds contemporaneous with low aromatic and
S02 levels. The wind speeds, generally fast, could account for
greater dispersion and lower concentrations in the cases of
aromatics and SO2; however it seems that for chlorinated
pollutants, specific point sources (dry cleaners for PCE, for
example), and not meteorological conditions, are the controlling
factors. Emission points and emission rates of these chemicals
are needed to confirm this hypothesis, the subject of analyses
presented in Volume III.
6C.3 Summary and Conclusions for the Initial Surface Trajectory
Analysis
Inspection of the surface trajectory analyses reveals no
markedly discernable meteorological episode signatures. The
extremes seem to be well-defined: the January 22-23, 1989,
stagnation episode (high aromatic, chlorinated hydrocarbon, and
SO2 concentrations) was associated with southwesterly winds;
while the February 9-10, 1989, well-ventilated period (very low
concentrations) was associated with westerly winds. The January
22-23 period found the New York metropolitan region in a forced
surface ridge beneath an upper east-west oriented ridge between
the northern and southern jets. Thus, the stagnation and high
concentrations had been heralded.
The December 3-4, 1988, day (high aromatics) was similar
aloft (cyclonic west northwesterly flow) to the February 9-10
valley day (both had SW to NW trajectories), but the former
contained a frontal passage from the NW. The September 1-2,
1989, case (high chlorinated compounds) was similar to the
December 3-4 case, except for expected seasonal modifications.
A-314
-------
The August 14-15, 1989, case (high aromatics and S02)
featured a surface ridge with an embedded precipitation-producing
trough, beneath an upper level short wave trough which was
advancing against a northwestward extension of the sub-tropical
ridge. Quite a different trajectory pattern is depicted for the
February 15-16, 1989, case, but similar concentration patterns.
The February 15-16, 1989, case featured stable precipitation in a
confluent southwesterly flow aloft, as a surface low pressure
wave passed to the south of the region (generally northerly
trajectories).
The concentrations of chlorinated compounds were at peaks
during the wintertime stagnation episode (January 22-23), and at
valleys during the summertime stagnation period (August 14-15).
However, the summertime period featured wind recirculation
patterns, whereas the winter period (at least during the sampling
interval) showed southwesterly winds. During the only other time
that chlorinated compounds exhibited peaks (September 1-2), the
trajectories were from the southwest. This seems to suggest that
the primary source area of chlorinated compounds is in the
corridor from Perth Amboy, New Jersey, northeastward into central
Staten Island.
A-315
-------
INTERPRETING SURFACE TRAJECTORY OUTPUT
BACKGROUND
The surface trajectory model prints output as a backward surface
trajectory of an atmospheric parcel; that is, assuming one is
standing at the point of origin, the location of the air packet
is traced back in tine.
EXAMPLE
Consider a 3 p.m. -6 p.m. trajectory. This trajectory assumes
that a parcel of air is located at the origin at 6 p.m., with the
positions of the parcel at 5, 4, and 3 p.m. indicated by
successive points which are connected by straight lines. To
cover the 2 4 -hour period of each air sample, the trajectory maps
contain eight three-hour trajectories superimposed on the same
map of the project area; therefore, one must carefully follow the
trace of separate trajectories on the map. The solid square
symbol completely obscures the other symbols at the parcel
terminal point; i.e., the 6 a.m. point obscures the 12 noon, 3
p.m., 6 p.m., 9 p.m., 12 midnight, 3 a.m., and 9 p.m. points on
each map.
Parcel terminal point-> o 6pm
x 5pm
i
i
x 4pm
x 3pm
Consistent trajectories, i.e., those with eight lines which more
or less followed each other very closely, could indicate or point
out source areas of pollutants. In some instances trajectory
consistency was observed; in others it was not, especially during
periods of air stagnation and recirculation.
Sometimes, only one or two previous hours are observed on the
trajectory; in these instances, wind velocities were relatively
high and the missing points are beyond the map boundary, in
Pennsylvania, western New Jersey, or eastern Long Island, for
example.
A-316
-------
MAP III - 6C-1
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 12/3-4/88
Ending Point: Susan Wagner High School
4.531
540
550 560 570 560 590 600 610 620
utm-easting
9 AM-12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
3 PM-6 PM
D
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
*
MET DATA FROM STATIONS 01-7
-------
MAP III - 6C-2
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 1/22-23/89
Ending Point: Susan Wagner High School
4.53
540
550
560
570
580
590
600
610
utm-easting
MET DATA FROM STATIONS #1-7
620
9 AM-12 NOON
—*—
12 NOON-3 PM
»• • • j"i • •»«
3 PM-6 PM
•a
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
-------
MAP III - 6C-3
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 2/9-10/89
Ending Point: Susan Wagner High School
4.53
540
550
560
570
590
590
600
610
utm-easting
MET DATA FROM STATIONS jf\-7
620
9 AM-12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
—-O "
3 PM-6 PM
a
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
-------
MAP III - 6C-A
N
C
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT ..- 2/15-16/89
Ending Point: busan Wagner High School
4.53
540 550 560 570 580 590 6OO 610 620
utm-easting
MET DATA FROM STATIONS #1-7
9 AM-12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
—O -
3 PM-6 PM
a
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
—*—
-------
MAP III - 6C-5
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 8/14-15/89
Ending Point: Susan Wagner High School
4.53i
540
550 560 570 560 590 60O 61O 620
utm-easting
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
-- O-
3 PM-6 PM
D
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
MET DATA FROM STATIONS #1-
-------
MAP III - 6C-6
LJ
S3
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 9/1-2/89
Ending Point: Susan Wagner High School
4.53*
540 550 56O 57O 58O 59O 600 610
utm —easting
MET DATA FROM STATIONS 01-5
620
9 AM-12 NOON
—*—
12 NOON-3 PM
—-O •—
3 PM-6 PM
a
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
•-•-•-
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
-------
SOURCE IDENTIFICATION APPENDIX D -
SURFACE TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS FOR SOURCE IDENTIFICATION FOR CARBON
TETRACHLORIDE
6D.1 June 20-21. 1988 (Map III-6D-1)
Concentrations of carbon tetrachloride were highest at the
Carteret monitor during this time period, when surface
trajectories were from the west and southwest.
The microinventory lists several sources that are located
west and southwest of the monitor microinventory; included are
two dry cleaners, a gas station, and two auto refinishing shops.
In the point source inventory for carbon tetrachloride, only
the Middlesex County POTW has emissions greater than 1 tpy;
located 17.8 km from the Carteret monitor, its carbon
tetrachloride emissions are listed as 1.23 tpy.
Carteret POTW should be mentioned here; although it's annual
emissions are less than 1 tpy (0.45 tpy), its location only 0.4
km from the Carteret monitor makes it a potential contributor to
the high concentrations mentioned there.
6D.2 July 9-10. 1989 (Map III-6D-2)
Concentrations of carbon tetrachloride were highest at
Sewaren and Elizabeth during this period when the surface
trajectories were from the southwest.
The point source inventory for carbon tetrachloride lists the
following with emissions greater than 1 tpy:
Source Emissions ftpyi Distance (km)
to Sewaren
Hercules, Inc. 447.74 13.7
Middlesex County POTW 1.23 13.3
Here, once again, the principal contributor to the carbon
tetrachloride concentration at the monitor was an industrial
source.
A-324
-------
MAP III - 6D-1
I
M
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 6/20 - 2
Ending Point: Richmond Rd. Pump Station
4,53
540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620
utm — easting
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
e
3 PM-6 PM
a
6 PM-9 PM
...A-
9 PM-12 MID
12 MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
—*—
MET DATA FROM STATIONS #15
-------
-
MAP III - 6D-2
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 7700 - 10/H9
Ending Point: Richmond Rd. Pump Station
4.531
540
550
560 570 '.80 590
utm- easting
600
6)0
6?0
9 AM-13 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
' >
3 PM-6 I'M
D
6 PM-9 I'M
-A--
0 PM-1J MID
12 MI I)-3 AM
•
3 AM-(> AM
6 AM-0 AM
MET DATA FROM STATIONS #1-6
-------
SOURCE IDENTIFICATION APPENDIX E -
RELATIVE SOURCE IMPACT
6E.1 Introduction
This section presents a technique which can be used to
demonstrate the relative extents to which air quality impacts at
a monitor are a function of distance and emission rates of the
sources and source areas in the project study area. In general,
the relative impacts of sources with high emissions at large
distances from the monitor were compared with relative impacts of
sources with low emissions at small distances from the monitor.
The goal of this analysis was to establish the relative
importance of emissions and distance in the source-receptor
relationships.
6E.2 Methodology
The SCREEN dispersion model was used with assumed stack
parameters (i.e. exit velocity, exit temperature, ambient
temperature, stack diameter). Unit emission rates were used, and
the computed impacts were multiplied by actual source emissions
to determine source contribution. Source distances from monitors
were simulated by using discrete receptors.
The objective of this analysis was to determine relative
impacts of several sources. Hence, it is the difference in
impact that is significant, not the impact values computed using
the assumed parameters.
The pollutant rose analyses were assessed, and
source/monitor relationships that were representative of a
straight line were chosen. This was necessary since the SCREEN
model computes impacts based on persistence of wind direction for
one hour, in addition to the straight line geometry of sources
and monitors, the sources farthest from the monitor must have
greater emissions than the sources closer to the monitor. It is
assumed that nearby sources with high emissions will have more of
an impact on the monitor than more distant sources with similar
or lower emission rates.
6E.3 Limitations of Analyses
The use of assumed stack parameters in these analyses is
probably the greatest limitation in the credibility of this
A-327
-------
undertaking. Analyses should be more credible for those sources
in the same category, e.g., POTWs, since sources in the same
category are more likely to have similar stack parameters than
are a mixture of several source categories. This should be kept
in mind when interpreting results.
The usual limitations of any dispersion model must be
considered as well. These limitations include approximations
such as constant wind direction for one hour periods, Gaussian
pollutant distribution, and constant ambient temperature.
6E.4 Relative Source Impact Analyses
This analysis used a different approach from that used in
Section 6.3 of this volume.
6E.4.1 Analysis #1 - Toluene, year 2
This analysis considered Pollutant Rose D - toluene (year
2). This rose indicated a relationship between southwest winds
and high average concentrations of this pollutant at the
Elizabeth monitor.
See the appendix for the earlier pollution rose results,
where nine sources were listed with emissions of greater than 5
tpy. From these nine, five sources were selected. Relative
contributions to impact from each source as determined by the
screening modeling are presented in the following table.
Source Emission Distance Unit impact. Estimated
Rate (g/s) (km) (jta/«ij)/(g/s) Impact.
General Motors 3.08 5.9 5.913 18.21
Safety Kleen 1.90 5.7 6.161 11.71
Merck 4 Co. 1.34 6.5 5.274 7.07
Middlesex POTU 1.32 23.7 1.257 1.66
Midatlantic Container 0.17 4.2 8.926 1.52
For the first three facilities, more or less equidistant
from the monitor, the ratio of their impacts is approximately
equal to the ratio of their emissions. The proportionality holds
for two sources with equal emissions and varying distances from
the monitor; see Merck & Co. and Middlesex POTW. It can be seen
from the chart that the relative contributions of the last two
sources are approximately equal; the higher emissions of
Middlesex POTW are offset by the closer distance of Midatlantic
Container.
A-328
-------
6E.4.2 Analysis #2 - 1.1.1-trichloroethane
This relative source impact analysis considered Pollutant
Rose E - 1,1,1-trichloroethane. This rose depicted a strong
association of northeast winds with high concentrations of 1,1,1
trichloroethane at the Port Richmond monitor.
Sources were located from the inventory as shown in the
Appendix. Of the nine sources listed, seven were selected.
Relative contributions to impact from each source as determined
by screening modeling are presented in the following table.
Source Emission Distance Unit impact. Estimated
Rate (g/s) (km) (ug/mj)/(g/s) Impact, ug/m3
PD Oil/Chem Stor. 1.93 3.0 13.66 26.36
Gordon Term. Svce. 0.42 2.7 15.66 6.58
Edison Price,Inc. 0.30 19.1 1.58 0.47
Newtown Creek POTU 0.21 16.5 1.85 0.39
Simplex Ceiling Co. 0.20 12.7 2.46 0.49
Bayonne POTU 0.05 2.5 17.32 0.87
Port Richmond POTW 0.03 1.2 47.45 1.42
The top two emitters in the inventory contribute the most to
the total impact at the monitor, not surprising considering their
short distance from the monitor. The third highest contributor
here is the lowest emitting source — the Port Richmond POTW.
This illustrates the importance of distance from the monitor; a
very small source like the Port Richmond POTW can still have a
significant impact on the monitor relative to sources that are
larger but more distant.
6E.5 Comments
It should be mentioned here that very stable meteorological
conditions and low wind speeds were assumed for computing
relative impacts. It is assumed that the actual monitored
impacts were at maxima when meteorological conditions were
indicative of a stable situation. Thus, there is confidence that
the dispersion regime used in computing highest impacts was
reflective of the actual dispersion environment during days of
high pollutant concentration.
A-329
-------
SOURCE IDENTIFICATION APPENDIX P -
QUALITY ASSURANCE
6F.1 Internal Quality Assurance
6F.1.1 Wind measurements
Quality assurance of the wind instruments is provided by the
National Weather Service for the airport stations used, and by
NYSDEC for the three wind sites located on Staten Island.
Quality Assurance procedures include system and performance
audits of instruments and recording systems.
6F.1.2 Concentration data
The air toxics data used as input for pollution rose models
and for the selection of days for the surface trajectory model
analyses are regarded as having undergone proper quality
assurance by the Quality Assurance Subcommittee. This includes
quality assurance for the instruments as well as the chemical
analyses.
6F.2 Quality Assurance for the Trajectory Model and
the Pollutant Rose
The surface trajectory model was adapted from a model
developed to study the transport of ozone and its precursors
(U.S. EPA, 1989).
The pollution rose program simply assembles a chart and
provides graphical output derived from this chart.
6F.3 Wind Instruments
6F.3.1 Instrument siting
The following principles concerning meteorological
measurements for air pollution monitoring (U.S. EPA, 1983) have
been followed to the extent possible. Specific comments
regarding siting for the instruments used in this project can be
found in a memorandum (Barrett, 1989) in Volume VI, Appendix, of
the SI/NJ UATAP project report.
A-330
-------
The primary objective of instrument siting is to place the
instrument in a location where it can make precise measurements
that are representative of the general state of the atmosphere in
that area, consistent with the objectives of the data collection
program. Because most atmospheric properties change dramatically
with height and surroundings, certain somewhat arbitrary
conventions must be observed so that measurements can be
compared.
"The standard exposure of wind instruments over level, open
terrain is 10 meters above the ground" (U.S. EPA, 1983);
however optimum measurement height may vary according to
data needs. Open terrain is defined as an area where the
horizontal distance between the instrument and any
obstruction is at least ten times the height of the
obstruction. An obstruction may be man made (such as a
building) or natural (such as a tree). The wind instrument
should be securely mounted on a mast that will not twist,
rotate, or sway. If it is necessary to mount the wind
instrument on the roof of a building, it should be mounted
high enough to be out of the area in which the air flow is
disturbed by the building. This is usually 1.5 times the
height of the building above the roof so that the instrument
is out of the wake of the obstruction. This is not a good
practice, however? it should be resorted to only when
absolutely necessary. Sensor height and its height above
the obstructions, as well as the character of nearby
obstructions, should be documented.
6F.3.2 Meteorological towers
Towers should be located in an open,level area
representative of the area under study. They should be of the
open grid type of construction, typical of most radio and
television broadcast towers. Enclosed towers, stacks, water
storage tanks, grain elevators, cooling towers, and similar
structures should not be used (U.S. EPA, 1983). Towers must be
rugged enough so that they may be safely climbed to install and
service the instruments. Folding or collapsible towers that make
the instruments available to be serviced or calibrated at the
ground are desirable provided they are sufficiently rigid to hold
the instruments in the proper orientation and attitude during
normal weather conditions.
wind instruments should' be mounted above the top of the
tower or on booms projecting horizontally out from the tower. If
a boom is used, it should support the sensor at a distance equal
to twice the maximum diameter or diagonal of the tower away from
the nearest point on the tower. The boom should project into the
direction which provides the least distortion for the most
important wind direction. For example, a boom mounted to the
A-331
-------
east of the tower will provide least distortion for north or
south winds.
An assessment of the meteorological towers used in this
project can be found in a memorandum (Barrett, 1989) in Volume
VI, the appendix of the SI/NJ UATAP project report.
6F. 3.3 Station Siting
It is important that care be taken in selecting station
location with respect to major man-made and topographic features
such as cities, mountains, and large bodies of water, since they
affect meteorological variables. Some of these features are
found within the project study area. The effect of cities has
been studied extensively (U.S. EPA, 1983). Documented effects
include a decrease in average wind speed, decrease in atmospheric
stability, increase in turbulence, increase in temperature, and
changes in precipitation patterns. These changes have an impact
on the evaluation and interpretation of meteorological and air
quality data from an urban area.
Almost any physical object has an effect on atmospheric
motion. It is probably impossible to find a site that is
completely free from obstruction; such was the case with the
meteorological towers for this project. If obstructions are
present, the monitoring site chosen should be appropriate for
study of the area of interest. For example, if the area of
interest is in a valley or sea coast, then the meteorological
instruments should be in that valley or near the coast, not on a
nearby hilltop or 30 km inland at a more convenient airport site.
The meteorological sites for this project were chosen with
the different physical features in mind. These sites are
representative of the typical air flow regimes present on Staten
Island. The Tottenville site represents sea-breeze flow from
nearby Raritan Bay, the Pump Station site reflects flat terrain
conditions, and the "Susan Wagner High School site represents a
hillier terrain.
A-332
-------
SOURCE IDENTIFICATION APPENDIX G -
SUMMARY TABLES FOR ALL SURFACE TRAJECTORIES GENERATED FOR
PERCHLOROETHYLENE ANALYSIS
Key to symbols: N=North, NE=Northeast, E=East, SE-Southeast,
S=South. SU=Southuest, W=Uest. NU=Northwest
Table I1I-6C-1; High five perchloroethylene concentration dates ordered
from highest to lowest
Pump Station Carteret Travis
1. 1/22-23 1989 12/23-34 1988 2/15-16 1989
2. 1/10-11 1989 11/23-24 1988 11/30-12/1 1988
3. 11/5-6 1988 10/30-31 1988 1/22-23 1989
4. 1/16-17 1989 10/18-19 1988 2/27-28 1989
5. 10/24-25 1988 1/16-17 1989 2/21-22 1989
Table I1I-6G-2; Low five perchloroethylene concentration dates ordered
from lowest to highest
Punc Station Carteret Travis
1. 1/4-5 1989 2/15-16 1989 12/11-12 1988
2. 2/9-10 1989 2/21-22 1989 1/4-5 1989
3. 12/11-12 1988 2/27-28 1989 12/17-18 1989
4. 3/5-6 1989 3/5-6 1989 2/9-10 1989
5. 12/23-24 1988 10/12-13 1988 10/30-31 1988
A-333
-------
SOURCE IDENTIFICATION APPENDIX H -
SURFACE TRAJECTORIES NOT DISCUSSED IN SECTION 6.5
A-334
-------
MAP III - 6H-1
~
5!
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT - 3/11 - 12/89
Ending Point: Richmond Rd. Pump Station
4.531
540 550 560 570 580 590 600 610 620
utm —easting
9 AM- 12 NOON
12 NOON-3 PM
- O-
3 PM-6 PM
a
6 PM-9 PM
9 PM-12 MID
MID-3 AM
3 AM-6 AM
6 AM-9 AM
—*—
MET DATA FROM STATIONS #1-5
-------
MAP III - 6H-2
Ui
3"
SURFACE TRAJECTORY PLOT -10/15-16/87
Ending Point: Richmond Rd. Pump Station
4,53
540
560
5flO
57O
580
50O
000
010
utm-easting
02O
9 AM-12 NOON
•+-
12 NOON-3 PM
(' \
3 PM-6 PM
n
6 PM-9 PM
/.:•,---
9PM-12MID
12 MID-3 AM
•
3AM-6AM
6AM-9AM
—4-
MET DATA FROM STATIONS #1-5
------- |