U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
CANANDAIGUA LAKE
(MARIO AND YA1ES COUNTIES
NEW YORK
EPA REGION II
WORKING PAPER No,
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
-------
REPORT
ON
CANANDAIGUA LAKE
ONTARIO AND YATES COUNTIES
NEW YORK
EPA REGION II
WORKING PAPER No,
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
AND THE
NEW YORK NATIONAL GUARD
NOVEMBER, 1974
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of New York Study Lakes 1v
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 14
VI. Appendices 15
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)L water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a»b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
111
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the New York Department of
Environmental Conservation for professional involvement and to
the New York National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling
phase of the Survey.
Henry L. Diamond, Commissioner of the New York Department of
Environmental Conservation, and Leo J. Hetling, Director, and
Italo G. Carcich, Senior Sanitary Engineer, Environmental Quality
Research, Department of Environmental Conservation, provided
invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey.
Major General John C. Baker, the Adjutant General of New York,
and Project Officer Lieutenant Colonel Fred Peters, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the New York National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF NEW YORK
LAKE NAME
Allegheny Reservoir
Black
Canandalgua
Cannonsville
Carry Falls
Cassadaga
Cayuga
Champlain
Chautauqua
Conesus
Cross
Goodyear
Huntington
Keuka
Long
Lower St. Regis
Otter
Owasco
Raquette Pond
Round
Sacandaga Res.
Saratoga
Schroon
Seneca
Swan
Swinging Bridge Res.
COUNTY
Cattaraugas, NY; McLean,
Warren, PA
St. Lawrence
Ontario
Delaware
St. Lawrence
Chautauqua
Seneca, Tompkins
Clinton, Essex, NY; Addison,
Chittenden, Franklin, VT
Chautauqua
Livingston
Cayuga, Onondaga
Otsego
Sullivan
Ontario
Hamilton
Franklin
Cayuga
Cayuga
Franklin
Saratoga
Fulton, Saratoga
Saratoga
Essex, Warren
Seneca, Schyler, Yates
Sullivan
Sullivan
-------
CANANDAIGUA LAKE
Tributary Sampling Sites
Lake Sampling Sites
Sewaqe Treatment Facilities
'Jirect Jrainaae Area Limits
Map Location
-------
CANANDAIGUA LAKE
STORE! NO. 3604
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data and data of other studies indicate Canandaigua
Lake is oligotrophic. Of the 26 New York lakes sampled in the
fall when essentially all were well-mixed, only one (Schroon
Lake) had less mean total phosphorus, four had less mean dis-
solved phosphorus, but 16 had less mean inorganic nitrogen.
For all sampling data, four lakes had less mean chlorophyll a_,
but none had a greater Secchi disc transparency. Only a slight
depression of dissolved oxygen with depth (to 218 feet) was noted.
Birge and Juday (1914), in their classical study of the Finger
Lakes, reported a Secchi disc transparency of 3.7 meters for the
month of August. Survey data for the month of July indicate a
mean Secchi disc transparency of 3.0 meters for all stations, thus
there is some indication of change in transparency.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
The algal assay results indicate Canandaigua Lake was phos-
phorus limited at the time the sample was collected (October, 1972)
The lake data also indicate phosphorus limitation at all samp-
ling times; i.e., nitrogen to phosphorus ratios were greater than
14 to 1, and phosphorus limitation would be expected.
-------
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sourcesDuring the sampling year, Canandaigua Lake
received a total phosphorus load at a rate a little less than that
proposed by Vollenweider (in press) as "permissible"; i.e., an
oligotrophic rate (see page 13). Of that load, it is estimated
that point sources (including shoreline septic tanks) contributed
about 46%. The state-wide ban of phosphates in detergents may be
expected to reduce phosphorus loading from wastewater treatment
plants about 50% (after existing supplies of phosphate detergent
are exhausted). The ban on phosphate detergents, together with
the existing favorable loading rate, should preserve the oligotrophic
condition of Canandaigua Lake.
2. Non-point sources (see page 13)--The non-point phosphorus
exports of the Canandaigua Lake tributaries compare very favorably
to the exports of unimpacted streams studied elsewhere in New York
(e.g., Keuka Lake*). However, the phosphorus export of the unnamed
stream (C-l) was appreciably greater than the other streams and may
have resulted from septic tanks at the community of Vine Valley (see
map, page vi).
In all, it is estimated that non-point sources contributed about
54% of the total phosphorus load to the lake during the sampling
year.
* Working Paper No. 160.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphemetry :
1. Surface area: 10,624 acres.
2. Mean depth: 128 feet.
3. Maximum depth: 274 feet.
4. Volume: 1,359,872 acre/feet.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 15 years.
B,
Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix A for flow data)
1.
Tributaries -
Name
West River
Seneca Point Gulley
Unnamed Stream (C-l)
Barnes Gulley
Menteth Gulley
Naples Creek
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage -
Totals
Outlet -
Drainage area* Mean flow*
29.3 mi2
4.4 mi 2
4.7 mi 2
1.3 mi 9
6.0 mi.
47.7 mi*
74.0 mi2
17.1 cfs
2.6 cfs
2.7 cfs
0.7 cfs
3.6 cfs
49.1 cfs
52.3 cfs
167.4 mi
.2
128.1 cfs
Feeder Canal & Canandaigua
outlet
Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 29.2 inches.
2. Mean annual: 22.8 inches.
184.0 mi2** 128.1 cfs**
t Gelser, 1974.
* Drainage areas are accurate within ±5%, except for small basins (±
mean daily flows are accurate within ±5 to 25%; and normalized mean
monthly flows are accurate within ±15%.
** Includes area of lake; outflow adjusted to equal sum of inflows.
*** See Working Paper No. 1, "Survey Methods".
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Canandaigua Lake was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1972 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time, samples
for physical and chemical parameters were collected from three stations on
the lake and from a number of depths at each station (see map, page v).
During each visit a single depth-integrated (15 feet or near bottom to sur-
face) sample was composited from the three stations for phytoplankton
identification and enumeration; and during the last visit, a single five-
gallon depth-integrated sample was composited for algal assays. Also each
time, a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the stations for
chlorophyll ^analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 15 feet at station
1, 218 feet at station 2, and 156 feet at station 3.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix B, and the data
for the fall sampling period, when the lake was essentially well-mixed, are
summarized below. Note, however, the Secchi disc summary is based on all
values.
For differences in the various parameters at the other sampling times,
refer to Appendix B.
-------
A. Physical and chemical characteristics:
FALL VALUES
Parameter Minimum
Temperature (Cent.) 4.5
Dissolved oxygen (mg/1) 8.0
Conductivity (ymhos) 304
pH (units) 7.6
Alkalinity (mg/1) 83
Total P (mg/1) 0.005
Dissolved P (mg/1) 0.004
N0? + N02 (mg/1) 0.260
Ammonia fmg/1) 0.030
(10/14/72)
Mean
9.8
9.4
319
8.0
107
0.008
0.005
0.360
Median
12.5
9.6
320
8.1
108
0.007
0.005
0.320
Maximum
13.8
10.6
340
8.2
120
0.029
0.007
0.480
0.032
ALL VALUES
0.030
0.040
Secchi disc (inches) 110
177
168
252
-------
E. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
05/27/72
07/21/72
10/14/72
Domi
nant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Chroococcus
Fragilaria
Dinobryon
Synedra
Anabaena
Other genera
Total
Synedra
Dinobryon
Fragilaria
Navicula
Cyclotella
Other genera
Total
Scenedesmus
Dinobryon
Flagellates
Pediastrum
Mel os i ra
Other genera
Number
per ml
1
,663
499
289
181
51
151
2,834
844
542
286
75
45
160
1,952
Total
5,151
-------
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
(Because of instrumentation problems during the 1972 sampling,
the following values may be in error by plus or minus 20 percent.)
Sampling Station Chlorophyll a_
Date Number (ng/1)
05/27/73 01 2.6
02 4.1
03 3.5
07/21/72 01 9.0
02 5.6
03 7.4
10/14/72 01 1.9
02 2.3
03 2.6
Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control
0.010 P
0.020 P
0.050 P
0.050 P + 5.0 N
0.050 P + 10.0 N
10.0 N
2. Discussion -
cornutum, indicates that Canandaigua Lake had a relatively
low potential for primary production at the time of sampling.
The assay also indicates Canandaigua Lake was phosphorus lim-
ited at the time of sampling. Note that the addition of
phosphorus alone or in combination with nitrogen produced
0.001
0.011
0.021
0.051
0.051
0.051
0.001
eld of the assay
0.192
0.192
0.192
0.192
5.192
10.192
10.192
alga, Selenastrum
0.1
2.0
6.3
8.6
14.2
14.9
0.1
capri-
-------
8
a yield significantly greater than the control yield, while
the addition of only nitrogen did not. The lake data also
indicate phsophorus limitation for Canandaigua Lake at all
sampling times (N/P ratios were greater than 14/1, and phos-
phorus limitation would be expected).
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix C for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the New York National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff months of April and May when two samples were collected. Samp-
ling was begun in November, 1972, and was completed in October, 1973.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the year
of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by the New
York District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the tributary sites
nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were determined
by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer program for
calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loadings for unsampled "minor
tributaries and immediate drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated by
2
using the means of the nutrient loads, in Ibs/mi /year, at stations C-l,
p
D-l, and E-l and multiplying the means by the ZZ drainage area in mi .
Loadings for Naples Creek were calculated in the same manner. The nutrient
loads attributed to the other tributaries are those measured or estimated
minus point-source loads, if any.
Bristol Harbor Village, Middlesex, Naples, and Rushville did not parti-
cipate in the Survey, and nutrient loads for these sources were estimated*.
See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
10
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal -
Name
Middlesex
Valley Central
School
Rushville
Village
Naples
Bristol Harbor
Village
2. Known industrial - None
Pop.
Served *
640
568
1,240
250
Mean
Treatment Flow (mgd)
septic tanks ?
& sand filters
storm sewers ?
& private systems
primary ?
secondary ?
Receiving
Water
West River
West River
Naples Creek
Seneca Point
Gulley
* Carcich, 1974.
-------
11
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
IDS P/ % of
Source y_r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
West River 1,050 7.9
Seneca Point Gulley 70 0.5
Unnamed Stream (C-l) 320 2.4
Barnes Gulley 20 0.2
Menteth Gulley 60 0.4
Naples Creek 1,570 11.8
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 2,440 18.3
c. Known municipal STP's -
Bristol Harbor Village 630 4.7
Middlesex 1,600 12.0
Naples 3,100 23.3
Rushville 140 1.0
d. Septic tanks* - 660 5.0
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 1,660 12.5
Total 13,320 100.0
2. Outputs -
Feeder Canal & outlet 4,630
3. Net annual P accumulation - 8,690 pounds
* Based on 1,052 lakeshore residences; see Working Paper No. 1.
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
12
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
Ibs N/ % of
Source y_r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
West River 51,660 14.8
Seneca Point Gulley 4,140 1.2
Unnamed Stream (C-l} 7,170 2.1
Barnes Gulley 1,180 0.3
Menteth Gulley 6,100 1.7
Naples Creek 57,380 16.4
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 89,020 25.4
c. Known municipal STP's -
Bristol Harbor Village 1,880 0.5
Middlesex 4,800 1.4
Naples 9,300 2.7
Rushville 5,340 1.5
d. Septic tanks* - 9,890 2.8
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 102,350 29.2
Total 350,210 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Feeder Canal &
outlet 174,560
3. Net annual N accumulation - 175,650 pounds
* Based on 1,052 lakeshore residences; see Working Paper No. 1.
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
13
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
2 2
Tributary Ibs P/mi /yr Ibs N/mi /yr
West River 36 1,763
Seneca Point Gulley 16 941
Unnamed Stream (C-l) 68 1,523
Barnes Gulley 15 908
Menteth Gulley 10 1,017
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (in press).
Essentially, his "dangerous" rate is the rate at which the
receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his "permissible" rate is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligo-
trophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Units
Ibs/acre/yr
grams/m2/yr
Total
1.3
0.14
Accumulated
0.8
0.09
Total
33.0
3.7
Accumulated
16.5
1.9
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
{g/m2/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Canandaigua Lake;
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 0.32
"Permissible" (oligotrophic rate) 0.16
-------
14
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1972. Canadaigua Lake study. Part I: Coliform, phosphate,
nitrate. Bulletin 2, Delta Laboratories, Inc.
Anonymous, 1973. Canadaigua Lake study. Part II: Temperature, pH,
dissolved oxygen, dissolved solids. Bulletin 5, Delta Laboratories,
Inc.
Birge, Edward A., and Chancey Juday, 1914. A limnological study of the
Finger Lakes of New York. Bull. U.S. Bureau Fisheries, 32: 525-614.
Carcich, Italo, 1974. Personal communication (wastewater treatment
plant at Bristol Harbor Village; populations served). NY State
Dept. Environmental Conservation.
Fitze, Fred, 1972. A winter study of Canandaigua Lake. MS, Eisenhower
Coll., Seneca Falls.
Forest, Herman S., William C. Grow, and Tracy Maxwell, 1971. Some
sources of input to Canandaigua Lake and their contribution to the
quality of the environment-1971. MS, Envir. Res. Center, State
Univ. Coll., Geneseo.
Gelser, Bruce M., 1974. Personal communication (lake morphometry).
Rochester.
Grow, William C., 1970. A water quality survey of West River, Naples
Creek, and Canandaigua Lake, summer and fall, 1970. MS, State
Univ. Coll., Geneseo.
Vollenweider, Richard A., (in press). Input-output models. Schweiz.
A. Hydrol.
Winship, Timothy R., and Sheila Coif, 1971. A study of the western
tributaries and outlet of Canandaigua Lake. MS.
Winship, Timothy R., Anthony Ellman, and Sheila Coif, 1973. Report
of the assistant watershed inspector for Canandaigua Lake, summer,
1973. MS.
-------
15
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR NEW YORK
11/26/74
LAKE CODE 3604
CANANOAIGUA LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE 184.00
JAN FE8 MAR
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS
JUN JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
3604A1
3604B1
3604C1
360401
3604E1
3604FI
360461
3604H1
3604ZZ
29.30
4.41
4.65
1.28
6.03
184.00
184.00
47.70
90.63
11.00
1.70
1.80
0.50
2.40
54.00
54.00
33.00
35.00
21.00
3.20
3.30
0.80
4.40
65.00
65.00
60.00
65.00
62.00
9.00
9.30
2.40
12.00
140.00
140.00
170.00
180.00
54.00
7.90
8.20
2.10
11.00
190.00
190.00
150.00
160.00
26.00
3.90
4.00
1.00
5.40
130.00
130.00
74.00
79.00
8.50
1.40
1.40
0.40
1.90
69.00
69.00
26.00
27.00
0.70
0.30
0.30
0.08
0.40
35.00
37.00
5.50
5.90
0.40
0.20
0.20
0.06
0.30
35.00
10.00
4.20
4.50
0.30
0.07
0.07
0.02
0.09
35.00
5.00
1*30
1.40
1.80
0.50
0.50
0.10
0.60
35.00
13.00
8.60
9.20
6.20
0.80
0.80
0.20
1.10
15.00
20.00
15.00
15.00
14.00
2.30
2.40
0.60
3.10
45.00
44.00
43.00
46.00
17.13
2.60
2.68
0.69
3.5S
72.28
64.68
49.14
52.25
360431
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
64.00
94.00
32.00
36.00
80.00
51.00
30.00
26.00
1.40
0.30
0.20
0.30
2.40
8.00
2.50
5.50
12.00
11.00
4.70
4.30
0.40
0.20
0.20
0.20
5
2
6
4
4
7
5
3
28
17
9
6
5
2
6
4
4
7
5
3
28
17
9
6
184.00
184.00
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE
SUM OF S'JB-DRAINAGE AREAS
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY FLOW DAY
3604A1
28.00
50.00
42.00
130.00
220.00
150.00
33.00
15.00
0.60
0.50
0.30
0.20
4.50
3.80
2.50
18.00
33.00
23.00
5.10
2.40
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.20
21
19
21
19
SUMMARY
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
FLOW DAY
FLOW
18.00
15.00
2.80
2.50
1538.99
1645.00
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR NEW YORK
11/26/74
LAKE CODE 3604
CANANOAIGUA CAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW HAY
3604C1
360401
3604E1
3604F1
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
?
3
4
5
6
7
0
9
10
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
FLO* DAY
FLOW DAY
FLO*
2.40
6.40
2.70
5.70
12.00
11.00
4.80
4.30
0.40
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.60
2.10
0.70
1.40
3.20
2.80
1.20
1.70
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
3.30
11.00
4.00
7.60
16.00
15.00
6.50
5.80
0.60
0.30
0.20
O.?0
130.00
250.00
18P.OO
110.00
180.00
260.00
110.00
110.00
23.00
36.00
35.00
35.00
5
2
6
4
4
7
5
3
28
17
9
6
5
2
6
4
4
7
5
3
28
17
9
6
5
2
6
4
4
7
5
3
28
17
9
6
5
2
6
4
4
7
5
3
28
17
0
6
4,50
3.40
2.70
19.00
34.00
24.00
5.30
2.50
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.20
1.00
1.00
0.80
4.90
8.50
*..io
1.30
0.70
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
5.80
5.20
3.50
25.00
44.00
31.00
7.10
3.40
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.20
35.00
210.00
250.00
270.00
200.03
300.00
54.09
150.00
30.00
?7.00
3S.OO
35.00
21
19
21
19
21
19
21
19
2.90
2.50
0.70
0.60
3.90
3.90
240.00
190.00
-------
TRIBUTARY FLO* INFORMATION FO* NF.W YORK
11/26/74
LA
-------
APPENDIX B
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
360401
42 51 44.0 077 16 05.0
CANANDAIGUA LAKE
36 NEW YORK
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
72/05/27 17 00 0000
17 00 0011
72/07/21 11 20 0000
11 20 0004
11 20 0015
72/10/14 10 50 0000
10 50 0004
10 50 0011
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
14.9
12.9
26.1
25.8
12.6
12.5
00300
00
MG/L
12.4
13.2
fl.l
9.0
9.8
10.0
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
INCHES MICROMHO
156
12fl
180
280
300
300
432
429
320
310
310
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
SU
8.30
8.20
8.30
8.00
7.90
8.20
a. 20
8.20
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
115
114
no
109
109
111
108
108
2111202
0017
00630
N02&.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.340
0.320
0.290
0.270
0.270
0.260
0.260
0.260
FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.010
0.070
0.040
0.050
0.040
0.040
0.040
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.005
0.006
0.012
o.ou
0.012
0.007
0.007
0.007
00666
PHOS-DIS
MG/L P
0.005
0.002
O.OOS
0.007
0.006
0.005
0.004
0.004
32217
DATE TIME DEPTH CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET UG/L
72/05/27 17 00 0000 2.6J
72/07/21 11 20 0000 9.0J
72/10/14 10 50 0000 1.9J
J VALUE KNOWN TO BE IN ERROR
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
360403
42 47 48.0 077 17 12.0
CANANDAIGUA LAKE
36 NEW YORK
00010 00300
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER 00
FROM OF TEMP
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L
72/05/27 17 30 0000 12.7 12.4
17 30 0010 10.7 12.8
17 30 0030 8.3 13.4
72/07/21 11 52 0000
11 52 0004 23.3 8.6
11 52 0015 19.9 8.2
11 52 0130 4.4 11.0
11 52 0219 4.6 10.1
72/10/14 11 10 0000
11 10 0004 13.8 9.8
11 10 0015 13.8 9.6
11 10 0030 13.8 9.4
11 10 0050 13.1 9.4
11 10 0075 10.4 9.4
11 10 0100 5.7 9.6
11 10 0140 4.8 9.0
11 10 0180 4.6 8.8
11 10 0218 4.5 8.0
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
144
110
252
00094
CNOUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
300
300
300
300
384
340
283
298
320
318
318
320
318
320
325
335
330
340
11EPALES
3
00400
PH
SU
8.30
8.20
8.20
7.80
8.00
7.90
7.30
7.20
8.15
8.15
8.15
8.15
8.10
7.90
7.75
7.70
7.65
7.65
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
115
114
118
112
111
111
116
116
104
104
103
105
83
83
115
120
117
117
2111202
0219
00630
N028.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.310
0.350
0.360
0.310
0.310
0.340
0.420
0.450
0.290
0.290
0.290
0.290
0.370
0.390
0.440
0.460
0.470
0.480
FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.020
0.050
0.020
0.060
0.040
0.070
0.090
0.090
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.130
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
.040
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.008
0.010
0.009
0.015
0.017
0.028
0.037
0.037
0.007
0.008
0.007
0.096
0.006
0.905
0.005
9.008
0.009
0.929
00666
PHOS-DIS
MG/L P
0.002
0.009
0.005
0.010
0.008
0.009
0.010
0.010
0.005
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.004
0.004
0.904
0.005
0.096
9.007
32217
DATE TIME DEPTH CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET UG/L
72/05/27 17 30 0000 4.1J
72/07/21 11 52 0000 5.6J
72/10/14 11 10 0000 2.3J
J VALUE KNOWN TO BE IN ERROR
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
360403
42 42 00.0 077 21 02.0
CANANDAIGUA LAKE
36 i*E* YORK
DATE
FROM
TO
72/05/27
72/07/21
72/10/14
00010
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET
IB
18
18
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
1?
12
12
00
00
00
44
44
44
44
44
44
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0000
0010
0030
0000
0004
0015
ooeo
0086
0125
0000
0004
0015
0030
0050
0070
0090
0120
0156
CENT
10.1
5.9
5.1
22.1
19.9
6.1
4.6
13.3
13.3
13.2
13.2
7.6
5.9
4.9
4.7
00300
DO
MG/L
14.9
16.5
17.9
fl.6
8.0
11.6
9.8
9.R
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
H.6
8.6
10.6
HEP ALES
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
216
228
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
275
278
275
300
392
366
265
310
273
310
308
303
304
304
320
320
330
330
3
00400
PH
SU
8,20
8.10
8.00
8.10
8.00
7.80
7.30
7.30
8.10
8.10
8.10
8.10
8.05
7.75
7.70
7.60
7.60
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
116
115
114
111
111
111
114
115
106
106
109
104
106
107
113
112
109
2111202
0000
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.370
0.380
0.410
0.330
0.320
0.330
0.400
0.430
0.310
0.310
0.320
0.320
0.320
0.420
0.440
0.470
0.470
FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.040
0.030
0.050
0.060
0.050
0.110
0.080
0.080
0,030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.040
0.030
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.011
0.012
0.012
0.016
0.027
0.096
0.015
0.025
0.007
0.009
0.007
0.009
0.007
0.006
0.006
0.008
0.009
00666
PHOS-DIS
MG/L P
0.006
0.008
0.008
0.010
0.013
0.013
0.009
0.008
0.007
0.005
0.005
0.006
0.005
0.005
0.004
0.005
0.005
32217
DATE TIME DEPTH CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET UG/L
7?/05/?7 18 00 0000 3.5J
72/07/21 12 44 0000 7.4J
72/10/14 12 00 0000 2.6J
3 VKIASE, TJOSOVra TO HE.
EB.B.OR
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3604A1 LS3604A1
42 41 00.0 077 18 00.0
WEST RIVER
36 7.5 MIDDLESEX
I/CANANDAIGUA LAKE
LGT DUTY RD IN MIDDLE SEX BELO STP
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
72/12/0?
73/01/06
73/02/04
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/03
73/07/28
73/08/17
73/09/09
73/10/06
0063D 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
14
13
14
12
08
11
10
12
09
13
14
18
09
14
20
50
10
40
59
15
10
40
35
00
35
25
15
00
MG/L
0
2
2
2
">
?
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
.870
.250
.000
.500
.600
.400
.200
.020
.320
.520
.010K
.010K
.021
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
1.
0.
1.
0.
600
340
056
420
230
580
700
540
520
150
470
630
150
320
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.078
.021
.035
.039
.097
.066
.042
.035
.022
.078
.036
.018
.063
.020
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
046
021
020
023
032
054
046
044
066
105
028
027
021
005K
MG/L P
0.069
0.033
0.056
0.055
0.200
Q.QPO
0.105
0.070
0.115
0.155
0.095
0.090
0.105
0.055
K VALUf
LESS TH
TO
-------
ST3RET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
LS3604A2
4? 43 00.0 077 16 00.0
WEST RIVER
36 7.5 MIDDLESEX
I/CANANDAIGUA LAKE
ST HWY 245 B9DG HELD ^USHVILLE STP
11EPALES 2111204
4 COOO FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
72/12/02
73/02/04
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/03
73/07/28
73/08/17
73/09/09
73/10/06
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
14
13
12
08
10
09
16
09
12
14
18
08
13
50
40
20
40
40
40
25
45
45
45
00
20
40
MG/L
0
2
3
3
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
.975
.800
.200
.200
.100
.240
.300
.350
.450
.010K
.044
.010K
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
1*
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
0.
550
340
240
540
750
000
660
500
615
200
980
050
990
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OKTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
087
009
026
092
140
P17
0.022
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
015
073
046
014
149
022
MG/L P
0.048
0.024
0.024
0.044
0.084
0.098
0.035
0.138
0.189
0.069
0.079
0.040
0.019
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.060
.033
.055
.260
.120
.220
.063
.185
.230
.130
.168
.125
.155
K VALUE KNOWN TO BE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3604A3 LS3604A3
42 45 00.0 077 12 30.0
*EST RIVER
36 7.5 RUSHVILLF
I/CANANDAIGUA LAKE
9LODGETT RO BRDG ABOV RUSHVILLE STP
11EPALES 2111204
4 COOO FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
72/12/02
73/01/06
73/02/04
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/03
73/07/2*
73/08/17
73/09/09
73/10/06
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FFET
13
13
13
11
07
10
09
16
09
11
15
17
08
40
00
25
35
30
25
30
15
00
30
10
00
00
MG/L
0
3
3
4
.940
.600
.650
.100
3.400
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
.800
.660
.9*0
.400
.400
.042
.010K
.010K
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
500
330
170
330
470
500
460
980
540
460
920
600
100
980
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
060
017
016
028
147
031
010
033
016
on
036
063
044
030
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
012
008
007
013
056
018
006
005K
009
017
013
019
015
013
MG/L P
0.021
0.018
0.034
0.045
0.175
0.025
0.025
0.020
0.015
0.020
0.100
0.060
0,095
K VALUE KNOWN TO HE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
360481 LS360431
4? 44 30.0 077 20 30.0
SENECA PT GULLY
36 7.5 MIDDLESEX
T/CANANDAIGUA LAKE
PT PO BRDG NEAP SENECA PT
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
72/12/02
73/01/06
73/02/04
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/03
73/07/28
73/OB/17
73/09/09
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FFET
15
14
14
13
09
12
10
17
10
13
14
19
10
00
28
40
20
40
15
30
15
?5
50
10
00
20
MG/L
0.061
0.650
0.780
0.700
0.740
0.880
0.510
0.31S
0.300
0.378
0.080
0.098
MG/L
0,
0,
0,
0.
1,
0,
0,
1,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
.200
.180
.100K
.100K
.200
.160
.160
.050
.200
,420
,150
.420
.400
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.180
0.005K
0.010
0.005K
0.044
0.017
0.007
0.030
0.008
0.017
0.020
0.022
0.031
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.007
.006
.005K
.017
.014
.012
.005K
.005K
.017
0.013
0
0
0
.005K
.009
.009
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
P
OOfl
020
013
030
190
020
007
010
025
015
010
015
010
K VflLUE KNO*N TO 3E
LESS THAN INDIOTFD
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/36
3604C1 LS3604C1
4? 43 30.0 077 19 30.0
UNNAMED STREAM
36 7.5 MIDDLESEX
T/CANANOAIGUA LAKE
EAST LAKE RD BRDG IN VINE VALLEY
11EPALES 3111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
72/12/02
73/01/06
73/02/04
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/03
73/07/28
73/08/17
73/09/09
73/10/06
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL M
DAY FEET
14
13
13
12
08
10
10
16
09
12
14
17
08
13
00
25
45
00
15
55
00
35
15
20
52
25
45
30
MG/L
0.550
1.700
1.520
2.100
?.400
0.505
0.820
0.980
0.010K
0.760
0.147
0.048
0.010K
MG/L
0.250
0.200
0.100K
0.200
0.830
0.240
0.250
1.900
0.310
0.460
0.460
1.150
0.780
0.560
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-niS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OPTHO
MG/L
0.037
0.006
0.008
0.006
0.058
0.011
0.009
0.360
0.067
0.017
0.030
0.020
0.054
0.126
MG/L P
0.007
0.010
0.009
0.011
0.050
0.011
0.012
0.210
0.056
0.037
0.074
0.050
0.046
0.027
MG/L P
0.012
0.016
0.015
0.025
0.145
0.030
0.025
0.270
0.070
0.055
0.090
0.060
0.050
0.040
K VALUf KNOWN TO BF
LESS THaiNi INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/1l/?6
360401 LS3604D1
42 47 00.0 077 19 00.0
BARNES GULLY
36 7.5 CANANOAIG LK
T/CANANDAIGUA LAKE
WEST LAKE Rl) 8RDG NEAR FOSTER POINT
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
72/12/02
73/01/06
73/02/04
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/03
73/07/28
73/08/17
73/09/09
73/10/06
00630 006?5
TIME DEPTH NO*S,N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
15
14
15
13
10
12
10
17
10
14
13
19
10
15
20
40
35
40
00
25
40
25
30
20
58
?0
40
00
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
.059
.450
.530
.570
.590
.620
.220
.135
.011
.252
.520
.640
.770
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
.150
.330
.250
.170
.540
.185
.130
.720
100K
.170
.420
.310
,420
0.420
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OPTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
058
012
015
006
028
019
005K
052
006
005K
018
015
025
054
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.008
.010
.008
.008
.017
.014
.007
.008
.010
0.009
0
0
0
0
.009
.018
.015
.005K
MG/L P
0.010
0.012
0.011
0.020
0.120
0.020
0.010
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.025
0.015
0.015
K VOLtJE KNO'VN TO
LESS THAN
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3604E1 LS3604E1
42 48 00.0 077 18 00.0
MENTETH GULLY
36 7.5 CANANOAI6UA
T/CANANQAIGUA LAKE
WEST LAKE RQ BRDG NEAR MENTETH POINT
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
72/12/0?
73/01/06
73/02/04
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/03
73/07/28
73/03/17
73/09/09
73/10/06
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
15 55
14 45
15 15
13 50
10 10
13 00
10 45
17 35
10 35
14 40
13 55
19 30
11 00
11 40
0630
AN03
OTAL
G/L
0.302
0.930
1.260
0.840
0.870
0.900
0.800
0.231
0.110
0.410
0.390
0.066
0.024
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.120
0.190
0.250
0.720
0.190
0.560
0.440
0.150
0.540
0.290
0.480
0.460
0.300
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.110
0.005K
0.005K
0.013
0.023
0.027
0.006
0.018
0.005K
0.015
0.014
0.036
0.033
0.031
00671
PH05-DIS
OPTriO
MG/L P
0.005
0.007
0.007
0.006
0.013
0.011
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.007
0.005K
0.007
0.006
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.006
0.009
0.010
0.015
0.115
0.015
0.005K
0.010
0.005K
0.015
0.005K
0.010
0.006
0.005K
K VALUE KNOWN TO D£
LESS
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3604F1 LS3604F1
42 52 30.0 077 16 30.0
FEEDER CANAL
36 7.5 CANANDAIGUA
0/CANANDAIGUA LAKE
bT HWY 20 BPDG NEAR KERSHAWPARK
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
72/12/02
73/01/06
73/02/04
73/03/0**
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/03
73/07/28
73/08/17
73/09/09
73/10/06
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY
13
14
16
14
10
13
13
17
11
15
13
19
11
15
00630
N02&N03
00625
TOT KJFL
N-TOTAL N
FEET
00
55
15
15
30
10
00
45
00
00
35
59
30
20
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.450
.390
.440
.550
.460
.520
.370
.357
.026
.273
.069
.033
.054
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
*
*
500
210
210
320
250
240
350
870
300
380
480
380
560
120
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.130
.005K
.007
005K
.009
.032
.008
.028
.011
.008
.023
.020
.065
.062
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.006
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.007
0.005K
0.005K
0.006
O.OO^K
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.010
0.007
0.008
0.020
0.010
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.015
0.010
0.010
K VALUE KNiO^N TO HE
LFSS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3604G1 LS3604G1
42 53 30.0 077 15 30.0
CANANOAIGUA OUTLET
3* 7.5 CANANOAIGUA
0/CANANDAIGUA LAKE
8RDG .75 MI E OF CANANDAIGUA
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
7P/12/02
73/01/06
73/02/0*
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/03
73/07/28
73/08/17
73/09/09
73/10/06
00630 006?5
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FFET
13
14
16
14
10
13
11
1R
11
15
13
20
11
15
00
59
30
25
40
15
20
00
10
?0
30
00
45
40
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
160
370
400
440
380
357
370
336
320
270
010K
0.020
0.
023
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
1.
450
160
210
260
350
260
250
200
290
350
6?0
150
0.600
0.
270
00610 00671 00665
NHS-N pHos-ms PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
147
Oil
0.010
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
006
013
012
006
02R
009
Oil
025
058
030
150
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0*
p
005K
005K
OC5K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
007
0.005K
0.
0.
0.
Oil
006
009
MG/L P
0.030
0.007
0.006
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.010
0.015
0.010
0.015
0.060
0.080
0.025
0.045
K VALUE KMOW-\J TO R"E
LESS THAN
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3604H1 LS3604H1
42 39 00.0 077 22 30.0
NAPLES CREEK
36 7.5 MIDDLESEX
T/CANANDAIGUA LAKE
PARISH FLAT RD 500 FT 5E OFNY 21
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
72/12/02
73/01/06
73/02/04
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/03
73/07/28
73/08/17
73/09/09
73/10/06
00630 006?5
TIME DEPTH N02&.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
OAY FEET
14
14
14
13
09
11
10
17
10
13
14
18
09
14
30
07
20
00
10
30
?0
00
00
30
30
40
50
20
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.760
.790
.820
.740
.620
.680
.660
.490
.350
.460
.610
.770
.560
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
200
140
160
240
670
180
150
460
140
480
290
690
710
100K
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-niS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.110
0.007
0.016
0.013
0.022
0.015
0.009
0.020
0.005K
0.015
0.014
0.030
0.023
0.028
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*
.
*
p
009
006
005K
007
007
008
005K
005K
006
008
005K
008
010
005K
MG/L P
0.023
0.017
0.019
0.045
0.140
0.030
0.010
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.050
0.015
0.020
K V^LUF KNOWN TO 3t
LFSS THAN INDICATED
------- |