U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
CARRY FALLS RESERVOIR
ST, LAWRENCE COUNTY
NEW YORK
EPA REGION II
WORKING PAPER No, 151
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
-------
REPORT
ON
CARRY FALLS RESERVOIR
ST, LAWRENCE COUNTY
NEW YORK
EPA REGION II
WORKING PAPER No, 151
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
AND THE
NEW YORK NATIONAL GUARD
NOVEMBER, 1974
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword i i
List of New York Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
Hi. Lake Water Quality Summary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 9
V. Literature Reviewed 13
VI. Appendices 14
-------
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
ill
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the New York Department of
Environmental Conservation for professional involvement and to
the New York National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling
phase of the Survey.
Henry L. Diamond, Commissioner of the New York Department of
Environmental Conservation, and Leo J. Hetling, Director, and
Halo G. Carcich, Senior Sanitary Engineer, Environmental Quality
Research, Department of Environmental Conservation, provided
invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey.
Major General John C. Baker, the Adjutant General of New York,
and Project Officer Lieutenant Colonel Fred Peters, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the New York National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF NEW YORK
LAKE NAME
Allegheny Reservoir
Black
Canandaigua
Cannonsville
Carry Falls
Cassadaga
Cayuga
Champ!ain
Chautauqua
Conesus
Cross
Goodyear
Huntington
Keuka
Long
Lower St. Regis
Otter
Owasco
Raquette Pond
Round
Sacandaga Res.
Saratoga
Schroon
Seneca
Swan
Swinging Bridge Res,
COUNTY
Cattaraugas, NY; McLean,
Warren, PA
St. Lawrence
Ontario
Del aware
St. Lawrence
Chautauqua
Seneca, Tompkins
Clinton, Essex, NY; Addison,
Chittenden, Franklin, VT
Chautauqua
Livingston
Cayuga, Onondaga
Otsego
Sullivan
Ontario
Hamilton
Franklin
Cayuga
Cayuga
Franklin
Saratoga
Fulton, Saratoga
Saratoga
Essex, Warren
Seneca, Schyler, Yates
Sullivan
Sullivan
-------
stark Falls
Reservoir
CARRY
--_/—
FALLS
RESERVOt
CARRY FALLS
RESERVOIR
® Tributary Sampling Site
x Lake Sampling Site
Direct Drainage Area Boundary
Indirect Drainage Area
5 Mi
Map Location
-------
CARRY FALLS RESERVOIR
STORE! NO. 3606
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data show that Carry Falls Reservoir is mesotrophic.
Of the 26 New York lakes sampled in the fall of 1972, when essen-
tially all were well-mixed, 17 had more mean total phosphorus,
16 had more mean dissolved phosphorus, and 12 had more mean inor-
ganic nitrogen. For all New York data, only 2 lakes had less mean
chlorophyll a^, and 12 lakes had greater mean Secchi disc trans-
parency.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results show that Carry Falls Reservoir was
phosphorus limited at the time the assay sample was collected.
Lake data show phosphorus limitation at the other sampling times
as well (N/P ratios were never less than 41/1* and phosphorus
limitation would be expected).
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—During the sampling year, Carry Falls
Reservoir received a total phosphorus load at a rate less than
that proposed by Vollenweider (in press) as "dangerous" (eutrophic
rate) but more than his suggested "permissible" (oligotrophic) rate;
i.e., a mesotrophic rate (see page 12). However, as far as is known,
-------
the septic tanks serving shoreline dwellings were the only point
sources of phosphorus during the sampling year, and the load
from these sources is considered to be insignificant.
2. Non-point sources (see page 12)--The phosphorus exports
of the streams tributary to the Reservoir were similar to those
of other unimpacted streams studied elsewhere in New York.
In all, it is estimated that non-point sources contributed
almost all of the phosphorus load to Carry Falls Reservoir during
the sampling year.
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 6,458 acres.
2. Mean depth: 17.7 feet.
3. Maximum depth: unknown.
4. Volume: 114,300 acre/feet.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: 38 days.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix A for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name Drainage area* Mean flow*
Raquette River 783.0 mi2 1,357.7 cfs
Unnamed Brook (B-l) 1.9 mip 3.3 cfs
Unnamed Brook (C-l) 1.4 nrr 2.5 cfs
Minor tributaries & 2
immediate drainage - 76.6 mi 150.2 cfs
Totals 862.9 mi2 1,513.7 cfs
2. Outlet -
Raquette River 873.0 mi2** 1,513.7 cfs
C. Precipitation:
1. Year of sampling***: 44.5 inches.
2. Mean annual: 35.6 inches.
t Greeson and Robison, 1970.
* Drainage areas are accurate within ±5%, except for small basins (±10%);
mean daily flows are accurate within ±5% to 25%; and normalized mean
monthly flows are accurate within ±15%.
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 1, "Survey Methods".
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Carry Falls Reservoir was sampled three times during the open-water
season of 1972 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each
time, samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
two stations on the lake and from a number of depths at each station (see
map, page vK During each visit, a single depth-integrated (15 feet to
surface) sample was collected from the stations for phytoplankton identi-
fication and enumeration; and during the last visit, a single five-gallon
depth-integrated sample was collected for algal assays. Also each time,
a depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the stations for
chlorophyll a_ analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 27 feet at sta-
tion 1 and 40 feet at station 2.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix B, and the
data for the fall sampling period, when the lake essentially was well-
mixed, are summarized below. Note, however, the Secchi disc summary
is based on all values.
For differences in the various parameters at the other sampling
times, refer to Appendix B.
-------
A. Physical and chemical characteristics:
Parameter Minimum
Temperature (Cent.) 11.9
Dissolved oxygen (mg/1) 7.7
Conductivity (ymhos) 50
pH (units) 6.3
Alkalinity (mg/1) 10
Total P (mg/1) 0.011
Dissolved P (mg/1) 0.005
N0? + N03 (mg/1) 0.180
Ammonia fmg/1) 0.100
FALL VALUES
(10/10/72)
Mean Median
Maximum
12.2
8.3
50
6.5
10
0.011
0.007
0.184
0.105
12.2
8.3
50
6.5
10
0.011
0.006
0.180
0.105
12.6
9.0
50
6.7
10
0.012
0.008
0.190
0.110
ALL VALUES
Secchi disc (inches) 72
89
81
117
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
05/20/72
07/25/72
10/10/72
Dominant
Genera
1. Dinobryon
2. Anabaena
3. Cyclotella
4. Synedra
5. Chroococcus
Other genera
Total
1. Dinobryon
2. Schroederia
3. Pediastrum
4. Cryptomonas
5. Cyclotella
Other genera
Total
1. Dinobryon
2. Flagellates
3. Melosira
4. Schroederia
5. Chroococcus
Other genera
Number
per ml
2,378
709
173
152
152
108
152
1,446
Total
3,063
-------
2. Chlorophyll a_ -
(Because of instrumentation problems during the 1972 sampling,
the following values may be in error by plus or minus 20 percent.)
Sampling
Date
05/20/72
07/25/72
10/10/72
Station
Number
01
02
01
02
01
02
Chlorophyll a
(yg/l)
10.0
2.0
1.1
1.3
2.1
1.9
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control
0.010 P
0.020 P
0.050 P
0.050 P + 5.0 N
0.050 P + 10.0 N
10.0 N
2. Discussion -
cornutum. indicates that the primary productivity was low at
the time the assay sample was collected. The significant
increase in yield with the initial phosphorus spike (0.010
mg/1 P), indicates that the sample was phosphorus limited.
Note that a further increase in yield did not occur until
0.005
0.015
0.025
0.055
0.055
0.055
0.005
eld of the
0.192 0.2
0.192 5.5
0.192 4.0
0.192 4.6
5.192 18.9
10.192 20.6
10.192 0.1
assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
-------
8
nitrogen and phosphorus were added together (Indicating that
nitrogen became limiting at phosphorus levels somewhat less
than 0.015 mg/1). Also, note that the yield was not signifi-
cantly different from the control yield when only nitrogen
was added.
The lake data indicate that phosphorus was the limiting
nutrient on all three sampling trips (N/P ratios were greater
than 41/1 on all occasions , and phosphorus limitation would
be expected).
-------
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix C for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the New York National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the tribu-
tary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high runoff
month of May when two samples were collected. Sampling was begun in Novem-
ber, 1972, and was completed in October, 1973.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the year
of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by the New
York District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the tributary sites
nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were determined
by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Suvey computer program for
calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loadings for unsampled "minor
tributaries and immediate drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) were estimated by
2
using the means of the nutrient loads, in Ibs/mi /year, at stations B-l
2
and C-l and multiplying the means by the ZZ area in mi .
There are no known waste treatment plants impacting Carry Falls
Reservoir.
* See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
10
A. Waste Sources:
1. Known municipal - None
2. Known industrial - None
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
Ibs P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Raquette River 34,750 84.5
Unnamed Brook (B-l) 120 0.3
Unnamed Brook (C-l) 100 0.2
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 5,110 12.4
c. Known municipal - None
d. Septic tanks* - 10 <0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 1,010 2.5
Total 41,100 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Raquette River 29,670
3. Net annual P accumulation - 11,430 pounds
* Based on 15 shoreline dwellings; see Working Paper No. 1.
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
11
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
Ibs N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Raquette River 2,248,670 85.5
Unnamed Brook (B-l) 7,530 0.3
Unnamed Brook (C-l) 5,630 0.2
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 305,470 11.6
c. Known municipal
d. Septic tanks* - 350 <0.1
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 62,220 2.4
Total 2,629,870 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Raquette River 3,035,940
3. Net annual N loss - 406,070 pounds
* Based on 15 shoreline dwellings; see Working Paper No. 1.
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
12
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
2 2
Tributary Ibs P/mi /yr Ibs N/mi /yr
Raquette River 44 2,872
Unnamed Brook (B-l) 63 3,963
Unnamed Brook (C-l) 71 4,021
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (in press).
Essentially, his "dangerous" rate is the rate at which the
receiving waters would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his "permissible" rate is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligo-
trophic if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would
be considered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Units Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
Ibs/acre/yr 6.4 1.8 407.2 loss*
grams/m2/yr 0.71 0.20 45.6
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m^/yr) based on mean depth and mean
hydraulic retention time of Carry Falls Reservoir:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 1.36
"Permissible" (oligotrophic rate) 0.68
* There was an apparent loss of nitrogen during the sampling year. This may
have been due to nitrogen fixation in the lake, solubilization of previously
sedimented nitrogen, recharge with nitrogen-rich ground water, unknown and
unsampled point sources discharging directly to the lake, or underestimation
of the nitrogen loads from septic tanks. Whatever the cause, a similar
nitrogen loss has occurred at Shagawa Lake, Minnesota, which had been in-
tensively studied' by EPA's National Eutrophication Research and Lake
Restoration Branch.
-------
13
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Greeson, Phillip E., and F. Luman Robison, 1970. Characteristics of
New York Lakes. Part 1: Gazetteer of lakes, ponds, and reservoirs,
Bull. 68, U.S. Dept. of Int. and N. Y. Dept. of Env. Cons., 124 pp.
Vollenweider, Richard A (in press). Input-output models. Schweiz.
A. Hydro1.
-------
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
LAKE CODE 3606
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR NFW YORK
CAtfRY FALLS RESERVOIR
11/26/74
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE 673.00
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA
JAN
FFR
MAR
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS
JUN JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
3606A1
3606A?
360681
360-6C1
3606ZZ
783.00
873.00
88
45
86.67
1200.79 1160.77 1400.93 3782.50 3492.31
2.58 2.51 3.02 8.14
1.99 1.93 2.33 6.28
119.00 116.00 139.00 375.00
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE =
SUM OF SUB-DRAINAGE AREAS =
130
492
7
5
347
.00
.31
.52
.80
.00
1430
1591
3
2
158
.00
.05
.43
.65
.00
761
849
1
1
84
.00
.56
.83
.41
.20
571
636
1
1
63
•
•
•
*
•
00
42
37
06
20
590.
658.
1.
1.
65.
00
43
42
09
30
SUMMARY
873.
873.
00
00
TOTAL
TOTAL
FLOW IN ;
FLOW OUT =
783.00 1070.00 1190.00 1357*66
873.58 1200.79 1320.87 1513.68
1.88
1.45
86.70
2.58
1.99
119.00
2.85
2.20
131.00
3.26
2.51
150.25
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
3606A1
3606A2
11
12
1
?
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
560.00
1860.00
1610.00
1720.00
3150.00
3340.00
2560.00
1910.00
865.00
553.00
63»,00
642.00
1750.00
2060.00
1790.00
1910.00
3500.00
3720.00
2850.00
2130.00
965.00
616.00
712.00
716.00
5
2
6
3
3
15
5
2
7
19
8
13
5
2
6
3
3
15
5
?
7
19
e
13
921.00
1660.00
2090.00
1630.00
1040.00
3220.00
2320.00
3030.00
1260.00
497.00
543.00
753.00
939.00
1550.00
2890.00
2120.00
1980.00
4230.00
2270.00
2930.00
?870.00
431.00
240.00
959.00
18167.66
18167.98
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
2390.00
19
2640.00
-------
FLO*
FOK
YUWK
11/26/74
LAKE CODF 3606
FALLS
3606^1
MONTHLY FLOWS AND «>AILY FLOwS
MOMTH YEAM MEAN FLOW
11
1?
1
s
6
7
fl
q
10
11
1?
1
3
4
5
6
7
fl
9
10
11
1?
I
3
S
6
7
8
q
10
12
7?
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
7?
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
7?
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
FLO* DAY
3.76
4.44
3.86
4.14
7.55
a. oi
6.14
4.59
?. OR
1.33
1.54
1 .54
2.90
3.43
?• 93
3. 1 9
5.8?
6.18
4.74
3.55
1.60
1.03
1.18
1.19
174. OP
204.00
178.00
191.00
348.00
360.00
283.00
?1 1 .CO
95. 7C
6 1 . ?n
70.70
71.10
s
•*
6
3
3
IS
5
?
7
19
8
13
5
?
6
3
3
15
5
2
7
19
S
13
5
2
6
i
3
15
S
?
7
10
8
13
2. IS
3.87
4.91
3.H2
2.43
11.40
7.00
H, *0
?.97
1.30
1 . 38
1.83
1 .98
3.54
4.4H
3.47
2.22
7.40
4.90
6.00
2. 30
1.12
1.20
1.50
102.00
184.00
232.00
180.00
115.00
357.00
257.00
335.00
139.00
55.00
60.10
83.30
FLOW OAY
FLOW
19
7.26
5.10
19
264.00
-------
APPENDIX B
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
360601
44 25 00.0 074 40 00.0
CARRY FALLS RESERVOIR
36089 NEW YORK
DATE TIME DEPTH
FROM OF
- TO DAY FEET
72/05/20 13 40 0000
13 40 0010
13 40 0020
7P/07/25 08 30 0000
Uft 30 0004
OR 30 0015
72/10/10 11 25 0000
11 25 0004
11 25 0015
11 25 0027
00010
WATER
TEMP
CENT
00300
DO
MG/L
10.9
10.8
10.8
22.0
22.0
12.6
12.5
12.4
14.3
14.8
16.4
10.0
9.8
7.7
7.7
7.7
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
117
78
72
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
50
50
50
50K
50K
50K
50K
50K
50K
50K
11EPALES
6
00400
PH
SU
5.90
5.90
5.80
7.40
7.40
7.20
6.35
6.30
6.50
6.45
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
2111202
0018
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.360
0.370
0.350
0.200
0.200
0.200
0.190
0.190
0.190
0.180
FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.150
0.040
0.100
0.090
0.100
0.110
0.110
0.110
0.100
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.100
0.008
0.008
0.012
0.011
0.011
0.011
00666
PHOS-OIS
MG/L P
0.006
0.009
0.006
0.008
0.006
0.007
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.007
32217
DATE TIME DEPTH CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET UG/L
72/05/20 13 40 0000 10.OJ
72/07/25 08 30 0000 1.1J
7P/10/10 11 25 0000 2.1J
K VALUE KNOW TO BE LESS
THAN INDICATED
j VALUE KNOWN TO BE IN ERROR
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
360602
44 25 00.0 074 40 00.0
CARRY FALLS RESERVOIR
36089 NErt YORK
00010
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER
FROM OF TEMP
TO DAY FEET CENT
72/05/20 14 14 0000 13.7
14 14 0010 11.8
14 14 0040 7.8
72/07/25 08 50 0000
08 50 0004 23.3
08 50 0015 23.3
03 50 0028 19.8
72/10/10 11 00 0000
11 00 0004 12.0
II 00 0015 11.9
11 00 0021 11.9
00300 00077 00094
DO TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIELD
MG/L INCHES MICROMHO
12.3 108 50
12.9 50
13.5 50
84 50K
7.4 50K
7.4 50K
7.0 50K
74 50K
9.0 50K
9.0 50K
B.9 50K
11EPALES 2111202
6 0032 FEET DEPTH
00400 00410 00630 00610 00665 00666
PH T ALK N02&N03 NH3-N PHOS-TOT PHOS-DIS
CAC03 N-TOTAL TOTAL
SU MG/L
6.30
5.70
5.70
7.60
7.60
7.50
7.30
6.60
6.70
6.60
6.60
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
MG/L
0.320
0.340
0.400
0.200
0.200
0.210
0.200
0.180
0.180
0.180
0.180
MG/L
0.030
0.050
0.020
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.100
0.110
0.100
0.100
0.100
MG/L P
0.009
0.009
0.008
0.012
0.009
0.010
0.009
0.012
0.011
0.011
0.012
MG/L P
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.008
0.006
0.008
0.007
0.008
0.006
0.005
0.006
32217
DATE TIME DEPTH CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET UG/L
72/05/20 14 14 0000 2.0J
72/07/25 08 50 0000 1.3J
72/10/10 11 00 0000 1.9J
VALUF KNOrfN TO BE LESS
Tt-UN INDICATED
J VALUE KNOWN TO Rt IN ERROR
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3606A1 LS3606A1
44 19 00.0 074 41 30.0
RAQUETTE RIVER
36 15 CHILDWOLD
I/CARRY FALLS RESERVOIR
ALOND RO OFF ST HWY 56 N OFSEVEY
HEPALES 2111204
^ 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
72/12/02
73/01/06
73/02/03
73/03/03
73/03/31
73/04/15
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/02
73/07/07
73/08/19
73/09/Ofl
73/10/13
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
10
09
11
10
10
10
09
10
12
09
11
12
12
11
30
30
30
28
00
30
35
45
10
30
30
45
30
30
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.208
.220
.410
.490
.520
.378
.378
.280
.240
.180
.273
.250
.210
.210
MG/L
0.300
0.500
0.310
0.400
0.100K
0.460
1.260
0.390
1.050
0.440
3.000
0.750
0.560
0.440
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OPTHO
MG/L
0.031
0.029
0.018
0.088
0.046
0.108
0.033
0.016
0.024
0.008
0.092
0.058
0.019
0.110
MG/L P
0.005K
0.006
0.005K
0.026
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.009
0.006
0.005K
0.005K
MG/L P
0.01S
0.018
0.005K
0.030
0.005K
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.015
0.010
0.020
0.010
0.010
0.010
K VALUF KNOWN TO Rt
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STOPET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3606A2 LS3606A2
44 26 00.0 077 45 00.0
RAQUETTE RIVER
36 15 CHILDWOLD
0/CARRY FALLS RESERVOIR
NEAR DAM WHERE ACCESSIBLE
11EPALES 2111204
* 0000 FEET
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
72/12/02
73/01/06
73/02/03
73/03/03
73/03/31
73/04/15
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/02
73/07/07
73/08/19
73/09/08
73/10/13
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
12 30
10 55
12 45
11 48
11 15
10 50
10 30
11 45
13 30
10 15
12 30
13 30
13 15
13 00
00630
NOP8.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.170
0.200
0.260
1.420
0.350
0.420
0.350
0.315
0.294
0.240
0.210
0.180
0.147
0.140
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.275
0.350
0.400
0.270
0.200
0.390
0.380
0.860
1.760
1.180
2.200
0.210
0.500
0.560
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.075
0.019
0.034
0.093
0.052
0.048
0.013
0.044
0.072
0.026
0.075
0.035
0.026
0.170
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.012
0.014
O.OOS
0.010
0.005K
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.005K
0.005K
0.010
DEPTH
K VALUE KNOWN TO BŁ
LESS THiiN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3606B1 LS3606B1
44 19 30.0 074 43 30.0
UNNAMED 8ROOK
36 15 CHILDWOLD
T/CARRY FALLS RESERVOIR
ST HWY 56 BRDG
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/05
72/12/02
73/01/06
73/02/03
73/03/03
73/03/31
73/04/15
73/05/05
73/05/19
73/06/02
73/07/07
73/08/19
73/09/03
73/10/13
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02S.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
09
11
10
10
09
09
10
12
09
12
13
12
11
00
15
45
45
30
50
40
55
30
50
00
15
45
50
MG/L
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.114
.156
.168
.100
.220
.154
.154
.078
.058
.056
.075
.086
.062
.084
MG/L
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
2.
2.
0.
0.
0.
460
200
400
400
250
420
520
690
700
800
400
980
750
860
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.075
0.073
0.050
0.084
0.105
0.048
0.028
0.023
0.046
0.084
0.082
0.050
0.034
0.290
MG/L
0.
P
005K
0.007
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
008
008
007
005K
005K
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.015
.017
.010
.015
.005K
.015
.010
.020
.015
.020
0.050
0
0
0
.040
.015
.010
DEPTH
K VALUE KMQVN TO HE
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3606C1 LS3606C1
44 20 00.0 074 43 30.0
UNNAMED BROOK
36 15 CHILDWOLD
T/CARRY FALLS RESEKVOIR
ST HWY 56 BRDG
HEPALES 2111204
------- |