U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
GOQDYEARLAKE
OTSEGO COUNTY
NEW YORK
EPA REGION II
WORKING PAPER No, 158
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
-------
REPORT
ON
GOODYEAR LAKE
OTSEGO COUNTY
NEW YORK
EPA REGION II
WORKING PAPER No, 158
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
AND THE
NEW YORK NATIONAL GUARD
DECEMBER, 1971
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of New York Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v, vi
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 8
V. Literature Reviewed 13
VI. Appendices 14
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)], clean lakes [§314(a»b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
iii
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the New York Department of
Environmental Conservation for professional involvement and to
the New York National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling
phase of the Survey.
Henry L. Diamond, Commissioner of the New York Department of
Environmental Conservation, and Leo J. Hetling, Director, and
Italo G. Carcich, Senior Sanitary Engineer, Environmental Quality
Research, Department of Environmental Conservation, provided
invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey.
Major General John C. Baker, the Adjutant General of New York,
and Project Officer Lieutenant Colonel Fred Peters, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the New York National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
iv
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF NEW YORK
LAKE NAME
Allegheny Reservoir
Black
Canadaigua
Cannonsville
Carry Falls
Cassadaga
Cayuga
Champ!ain
Chautauqua
Conesus
Cross
Goodyear
Huntington
Keuka
Long
Lower St. Regis
Otter
Owasco
Raquette Pond
Round
Sacandaga Res.
Saratoga
Schroon
Seneca
Swan
Swinging Bridge Res.
COUNTY
Cattaraugas, NY; McLean,
Warren, PA
St. Lawrence
Ontario
Delaware
St. Lawrence
Chautauqua
Seneca, Tompkins
Clinton, Essex, NY; Addison,
Chittenden, Franklin, VT
Chautauqua
Livingston
Cayuga, Onondaga
Otsego
Sullivan
Ontario
Hami1 ton
Franklin
Cayuga
Cayuga
Franklin
Saratoga
Fulton, Saratoga
Saratoga
Essex, Warren
Seneca, Schyler, Yates
Sullivan
Sullivan
-------
•42 32
74°57'
"4230
GOODYEAR LAKE
® Tributary Sampling Site
x Lake Sampling Site
0 Va Mi.
Scale
Map Location
-------
Portlandvi I le
01 Goodyear
GOODYEAR LAKE
® Tributary Sampling Site
x Lake Sampling Site
f Sewage Treatment Facility
_/ Direct Drainage Area Boundary
o SMI.
Scale
Map Location
-------
GOODYEAR LAKE
STORE! NO. 3613
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data show that Goodyear Lake is eutrophic. Of the
26 New York lakes sampled in the fall of 1972, 14 had less mean
total and dissolved phosphorus, and 10 had less mean inorganic
nitrogen. For all New York data, 12 had less mean chlorophyll
a_, and 18 had greater Secchi disc transparency.
Survey limnologists observed heavy growths of rooted aquatic
vegetation in the inlet arm of the lake.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Algal assay results show that Goodyear Lake was phosphorus
limited in October when the assay sample was collected. The
lake data indicate phosphorus limitation in May and July as
well (N/P ratios were 55/1 and 24/1, respectively).
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Point sources—During the sampling year, Goodyear Lake
received a total phosphorus load at a rate more than four times
that proposed by Vollenweider (in press) as "dangerous"; i.e.,
a eutrophic rate (see page 11). Of that load, it is calculated
that Cooperstown and Mil ford contributed just over 16%. Even
100% phosphorus removal at these point sources would still leave
-------
2
a loading rate of about 12.5 g/m /yr (more than 3h times the
eutrophic rate), and it is concluded that point-source control
of phosphorus would not result in a significant improvement of
the trophic condition of Goodyear Lake.
2. Non-point sources (see page ll)--Except for the
Susquehanna River, the phosphorus exports of the Goodyear Lake
tributaries were similar to those of unimpacted New York streams
studied elsewhere. However, the export of the Susquehanna River
was nearly twice the mean export of the other tributaries and
probably was due to point sources beyond the 25-mile limit of
the Survey*.
In appears that the large drainage area to lake area ratio
of about 582 to 1 will ensure an excessive phosphorus load to
Goodyear Lake from non-point sources alone. Note that even if
the lowest non-point phosphorus export measured (station D-l =
2
56 Ibs/mi /yr) was typical of the entire drainage, the phosphorus
o
loading rate would still be 6.0 g/m /yr, or nearly twice the
eutrophic rate.
* See Working Paper No. 1, "Survey Methods".
-------
II. LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometry:
4.
1. Surface area: 365 acres .
2. Mean depth: unknown.
3. Maximum depth: >23 feet.
4. Volume: unknown.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: unknown.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix A for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name
Susquehanna River
Unnamed Stream (B-l)
Unnamed Stream (C-l)
Unnamed Stream (D-l)
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage -
Totals
2. Outlet -
Susquehanna River
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 49.0 inches.
2. Mean annual: 41.8 inches.
Drainage area* Mean flow*
327.0 mi?
11.3 miŁ
2.6 mi;
3.9 mr
4.6 mi2
516.9 cfs
16.6 cfs
3.9 cfs
5.8 cfs
7.5 cfs
349.4 mi
,2
550.7 cfs
350.0 mr** 550.7 cfs
t Greeson and Robison, 1970.
* Drainage areas are accurate within ±5%, except for small basins (±10%);
mean daily flows are accurate within ±5 to 25%; and normalized mean
monthly flows are accurate within ±15%.
** Includes area of lake.
*** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Goodyear Lake was sampled twice during the open-water season of 1972
by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter.' In May and October,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from a number
of depths at one station on the lake (a second station was added during
the fall sampling; see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-
integrated (15 feet or near bottom to surface) sample was obtained from
the station(s) for phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and
during the last visit, a single five-gallon depth-integrated sample was
composited from the two stations for algal assays. Also each time, a
depth-integrated sample was collected from station one for chlorophyll a_
analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 23 feet at station 1 and 9
feet at station 2.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix B, and the
data for the fall sampling period, when the lake essentially was well-
mixed, are summarized below. Note, however, the Secchi disc summary is
based on all values.
For differences in the various parameters at the other sampling times.
refer to Appendix B.
-------
A. Physical and chemical characteristics:
Parameter Minimum
Temperature (Cent.) 11.0
Dissolved oxygen (mg/1) 9.0
Conductivity (vimhos) 260
pH (units) 7.7
Alkalinity (mg/1) 104
Total P (mg/1) 0.023
Dissolved P (mg/1) 0.009
N0? + N(L (mg/1) 0.120
Ammonia fmg/1) 0.050
FALL VALUES
'(10/11/72)
Mean Median
Maximum
12.4
9.4
262
7.7
107
0.032
0.011
0.149
0.110
12.3
9.1
262
7.7
107
0.031
0.013
0.150
0.100
13.7
10.0
265
7.8
108
0.043
0.016
0.170
0.190
ALL VALUES
Secchi disc (inches)
36
54
54
72
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
2.
Sampling
Date
05/21/72
07/28/72
10/11/72
Dominant
Genera
1. Synedra
2. Dinobyron
3. Fragilaria
4. Cryptomonas
5. Melosira
Other genera
Total
1. Tabellaria
2. Cyclotella
3. Dinobyron
4. Chroococcus
5. Oocystis
Other genera
Total
1. Fragilaria
2. Dinobryon
3. Cryptomonas
4. Cyclotella
5. Melosira
Other genera
Total
Number
per ml
593
586
239
231
94
556
2,299
4,678
1
148
841
497
344
217
841
3,888
Chlorophyll a_ -
(Because of instrumentation problems during the 1972 sampling,
the following values may be in error by plus or minus 20 percent-
Sampling
Date
05/21/72
07/28/72
10/11/72
Station
Number
01
01
01
02
Chlorophyll
(yg/1)
12.5
2.4
10.3
13.2
-------
0.006
0.016
0.026
0.056
0.056
0.056
0.006
0.253
0.253
0.253
0.253
5.253
10.253
10.253
0.3
5.3
6.5
7.4
23.0
22.4
0.6
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
1. Autoclaved, filtered, and nutrient spiked -
Ortho P Inorganic N Maximum yield
Spike (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) Cone, (mg/1) (mg/1-dry wt.)
Control
0.010 P
0.020 P
0.050 P
0.050 P + 5.0 N
0.050 P + 10.0 N
10.0 N
2. Discussion -
The control yield of the assay alga, Selenastrum capri-
cornutum, indicates that the potential primary productivity
of Goodyear Lake was moderate at the time the sample was col-
lected. Also, increasing yields with increasing concentra-
tions of orthophosphorus show that the lake was limited by
phosphorus at that time. Note that the addition of only
nitrogen produced a yield not significantly different than
the control.
The lake data further substantiate phosphorus limitation.
On all occasions, the nitrogen to phosphorus ratio was 19/1
or greater, and phosphorus limitation would be expected.
-------
8
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix C for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings,, the New York National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page vi), except for the high
runoff months of April and May when two samples were collected. Samp-
ling was begun in November, 1972, and was completed in October, 1973.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the New York District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were deter-
mined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loadings for un-
sampled "minor tributaries and immediate drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.)
2
were estimated using the means of the nutrient loads, in Ibs/mi /year,
at stations B-l, C-l, and D-l and multiplying the means by the ZZ area
.2
in mi .
The operator of the Cooperstown wastewater treatment plant provided
monthly effluent samples and corresponding flow data; however, the
untreated waste of the Village of Mil ford was not sampled, and nutrient
loads were estimated at 3.5 Ibs P and 9.4 Ibs N/capita/year.
Nutrient loads given for tributaries are those measured minus point-
source loads, if any.
* See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
A. Waste Sources:
t
1. Known muncipal
Name
Cooperstown
Mil ford
2. Known industrial - None
Pop.
Served*
2,403
527
Treatment
Imhoff
None
Mean Flow
(mg/d)
0.686
0.053**
Receiving
Water
Susquehanna
River
Susquehanna
River
t Anonymous, 1971.
* 1970 Census.
** Estimated at 100 gal/capita/day.
-------
10
B. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
Ibs P/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Susquehanna River 39,020 80.1
Unnamed Stream (B-l) 740 1.5
Unnamed Stream (C-l) 190 0.4
Unnamed Stream (D-l) 220 0.5
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 300 0.6
c. Known municipal -
Cooperstown 6,260 12.8
Mil ford 1,840 3.8
d. Septic tanks* - 110 0.2
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 60 0.1
Total 48,740 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Susquehanna River 35,560
3. Net annual P accumulation - 13,180 pounds
* Estimate based on 181 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 1
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
11
C. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
IDS N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Susquehanna River 1,039,300 91.1
Unnamed Stream (B-l) 36,800 3.2
Unnamed Stream (C-l) 7,250 0.6
Unnamed Stream (D-l) 11,300 1.0
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 13,800 1.2
c. Known municipal -
Cooperstown 24,550 2.2
Mil ford 4,950 0.4
d. Septic tanks* - 4,250 0.4
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 3,520 0.3
Total 1,140,770 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Susquehanna River 1,241,680
3. Net annual N loss - 100,910 pounds
Estimate based on 181 lakeshore dwellings; see Working Paper No. 1
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
12
D. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
2 2
Tributary Ibs P/mi /yr Ibs N/mi /yr
Susquehanna River 119 3,178
Unnamed Stream (B-l) 67 3,315
Unnamed Stream (C-l) 73 2,788
Unnamed Stream (D-l) 56 2,897
E. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates are compared to those proposed by Vollenweider (in press).
Essentially, his "dangerous" rate is the rate at which the
receiving water would become eutrophic or remain eutrophic;
his "permissible" rate is that which would result in the
receiving water remaining oligotrophic or becoming oligotrophic
if morphometry permitted. A mesotrophic rate would be consid-
ered one between "dangerous" and "permissible".
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Units Total Accumulated Total Accumulated
Ibs/acre/yr 133.5 36.1 3,125.4 loss*
grams/mz/yr 14.97 4.05 350.3
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m2/yr) based on surface area and mean
outflow of Goodyear Lake:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 3.40
"Permissible" (oligotrophic rate) 1.70
* There was an apparent loss of nitrogen during the sampling year. This may
have been due to nitrogen fixation in the lake, solubilization of previously
sedimented nitrogen, recharge with nitrogen-rich ground water, unknown and
unsampled point sources discharging directly to the lake, or underestimatio11
of the nitrogen loads from the Village of Mil ford. Whatever the cause, a
similar nitrogen loss has occurred at Shagawa Lake, Minnesota, which has
been intensively studied by EPA's National Eutrophication Research and
Lake Restoration Branch.
-------
13
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Anonymous, 1971. Inventory of municipal waste facilities. EPA
Publ. No. OWP-1, Vol. 2, Washington, D.-C.
Greson, Phillip E., and F. Luman Robison, 1970. Characteristics
of New York lakes. Part 1 - Gazetteer of lakes, ponds, and
reservoirs. Bull. 68, U.S. Dept. of Int. and NY State Dept.
Env. Cons., Albany.
Vollenweider, Richard A. (in press). Input-output models. Schweiz.
A. Hydrol.
-------
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOl* INFORMATION FOrt NEW YORK
11/26/74
LA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOP NEW YO*K
11/26/74
LA-
-------
APPENDIX B
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/03
361301
42 25 00.0 074 55 00.0
GOODYEAR LAKE
36 NEW YORK
00010 00300
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER DO
FROM OF TEMP
TO DAY FEET CENT MG/L
72/05/21 18 35 0000 17.9 H.9
18 35 0010 15.6 11.5
IB 35 0017 14.9 10.4
72/07/28 09 40 0000
09 40 0004 23.6 7.6
09 40 0015 16.1 10*2
09 40 0023 7.9 0.4
72/10/11 12 20 0000
12 20 0004 13.7 9.0
12 20 0015 13.4 9.1
12 20 0022 12.3 9.0
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
36
116
84
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
200
200
200
55
55
60
60
260
260
262
265
11EPALES
6
00400
PH
SU
7.60
7.30
6.90
6.80
6.10
6.30
7.80
7.80
7.70
7.70
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
82
85
88
12
11
11
11
107
107
108
110
2111202
0020
00630
N02&N03
N- TOTAL
MG/L
0.420
0.440
0.440
0.040
0.040
0.040
0.050
0.130
0.120
0.150
0.150
FEET DEPTH
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.060
0.080
0.060
0.070
0.070
0.110
0.180
0.190
0.120
0.100
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.024
0.026
0.027
0.008
0.008
0.013
0.016
0.031
0.026
0.026
0.023
00666
PHOS-DIS
MG/L P
0.008
0.008
0.011
0.004
0.006
0.007
0.004
0.011
0.013
0.009
0.010
32217
DATE TIME DEPTH CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET UG/L
72/05/21 18 35 0000 12.5J
72/07/28 09 40 0000 2.4J
72/10/11 12 20 0000 10.3
KNOWN TO 3x [-'I fiRRO-V
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 75/01/03
361302
42 25 00.0 074 55 00.0
GOODYEAR LAKE
36 NEW YORK
DATE
FROM
TO
72/10/11
00010
TIME DEPTH WATER
OF TEMP
DAY FEET CENT
12 00 0000
12 00 0004
12 00 0009
11.8
11.0
HEP ALES
6
21112*2
0022 FEET
DEPTH
00300
DO
MG/L
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
00400
PH
SU
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
00630
N02&N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
00665 00666
PHOS-TOT PHOS-DIS
60
9.8
10.0
262
265
262
7.70
7.80
7.70
104
108
106
0.160
0.160
0.170
0.070
0.060
0.050
MG/L P
0.036
0.039
0.043
MG/L P
0.015
0.014
0.016
32217
DATE TIME DEPTH CHLRPHYL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FEET UG/L
72/10/11 12 20 0000
13.2
J* VALUE KNOWN TO BE
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY and WASTEWATER
TREATMENT PLANT DATA
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3613A1 LS3613A1
42 32 00.0 074 58 00.0
SUS'JUEHANNA RIVER
36 7.5 MILFORL)
I/GOODYEAR LAKE
BANK OF ST HWY 28 'x| OF PORTLANOVILLE
11FPALES 2111204
^ 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/04
72/12/02
73/02/03
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/18
73/06/09
73/07/07
73/08/05
73/09/08
73/10/14
TIME DEPTH
OF
OAY FFFT
12 45
09 45
09 52
09 30
09 30
09 10
09 45
11 30
09 45
10 05
10 15
11 50
00630
U02S.N03
M-TOTAL
MG/L
0.420
0.530
0.560
0.780
0.550
0.470
0.400
0.230
0.220
0.315
0.010K
0.023
0.010K
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.300
0.330
0.690
0.660
0.360
0.440
1.150
0.660
1.380
0.460
1.200
0.680
1.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.050
0.014
0.066
0.088
0.035
0.016
0.040
0.021
0.052
0.024
0.220
0.100
0.030
00671
PHOS-DIS
OPTHO
MG/L P
0.025
0.005K
0.010
0.012
0.005K
0.005K
0.008
0.010
0.006
0.024
0.007
0.006
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L °
0.066
0.025
0.080
0.070
0.040
0.035
0.0<*5
0.040
0.050
0.050
0.050
0.030
0.040
K VALUE VKMN T-' ~
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3613A2 LS3613A2
42 29 30.0 074 59 00.0
SJSQUEHANNA RIVER
36 7.5 W DAVENPORT
0/GOODYEAR LAKE
ST HWY 7 BROG NEAR COLLIERSVILLE
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/04
72/12/03
73/01/07
73/02/03
73/03/04
73/04/07
71/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/l«
73/06/09
73/07/07
73/08/05
73/09/08
73/10/14
TIME DEPTH
OF
DAY FEET
10 10
10 15
09 35
10 ?0
10 12
10 25
09 50
10 30
10 10
10 50
09 45
10 40
10 38
12 13
00630
N02S.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.230
0.590
0.630
0.580
0.690
0.500
0.480
0.410
C.252
0.010K
0.290
0.120
0.075
0.210
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.380
0.350
0.330
0.230
0.440
0.350
0.460
0.760
3.200
1.100
0.520
0.370
0.920
2.000
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.044
0.025
0.015
0.033
0.058
0.020
0.023
0.011
0.085
0.008
0.033
0.058
0.042
Q.115
00671
PHOS-niS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.010
0.007
0.005K
0.006
0.024
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.006
-0.005K
0.021
0.006
0.007
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.058
0.030
0.030
0.030
0.050
0.040
0.025
0.035
0.040
0.045
0.035
0.020
0.030
0.015
K VALUE K^OVN TO «E
LESS THAN
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3M3A3 LS3M3A3
4? 41 30.0 074 55 30.0
SUSOUEHENNA RIVEH
36 7.5 COOPERSTOWN
I/GOODYEAR LAKE
BROS s PART or COOPERSTO*N ASOV STP
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/04
72/12/03
73/01/07
73/02/03
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/18
73/06/09
73/07/07
73/08/05
7V09/08
73/10/14
00630 00625
TIHF DEPTH N028.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N- TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
09
08
09
08
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
09
11
10
00
50
08
20
00
50
58
07
57
00
40
?\
?0
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
.266
.4?7
.500
.480
.520
.490
.490
.500
.500
.420
.310
.063
.105
.080
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
230
180
210
220
290
260
880
780
680
360
320
620
540
500
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-niS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
034
015
009
021
028
009
065
007
063
022
021
138
036
029
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
005K
005K
005K
005K
006
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
006
005K
007
007
MG/L P
0.044
0.011
0.010
0.015
0.015
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.010
0.010
0.025
0.020
0.035
K \/i\L'JE M
L(r^S TH.1N
TO
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3613A4 LS3613A4
42 41 00.0 075 56 30.0
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER
36 7.5 COOPERSTOWN
I/GOODYEAR LAKE
8RDG OFF ST HWY 26 8ELO COOPERSTOrfN STP
11FPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625
DATE TIME DEPTH MO?&N03 TOT KJEL
FROM OF N-TOTAL N
TO DAY FEET
7?/ll/04 12 05
72/12/03 09 20
73/01/07 09 10
73/02/03 09 23
73/03/04 08 40
73/04/07 09 ?0
73/04/21 09 05
73/05/05 10 12
73/05/18 09 25
73/06/09 10 15
73/07/07 09 ?0
73/08/05 10 00
73/09/08 09 33
73/10/14 11 30
MG/L
0.420
. 0.480
0.510
0.520
0.620
0.520
0.490
0.530
0.470
0.420
0.320
0.980
0.6BO
0.710
MG/L
0.4?0
0.220
0.310
0.540
1.150
0.440
0.350
0.720
3.000
0.440
1.320
?.940
?.700
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-OIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL OPTHO
MG/L
0.100
0.024
0.016
0.085
0.147
0.058
0.023
0.078
0.120
0.034
0.040
0.580
?.ooo
0.890
MG/L P
0.056
0.009
0.006
0.010
0.023
0.005K
0.008
0.017
0.013
0.020
0.008
0.450
0.460
0.480
MG/L P
0.091
0.024
0.020
0.060
0.095
0.030
0.025
0.035
0.065
0.040
0.035
0.525
0.550
0.575
K VALUE KNO*^ TO rf^
Less it-UN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3613B1 LS3613P1
4? 32 00.0 074 59 00.0
UNNAMED BROOK
36 7.5 MILFO&O
T/GOODYEAR LAKE
ST H*Y 23 BRDG
11FPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FPOM
TO
72/11/04
72/12/03
73/01/07
73/02/03
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/05/05
73/05/18
73/06/09
73/07/07
73/08/05
73/09/Oh
73/10/14
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH NO?&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
13
09
09
10
10
10
10
09
10
10
10
10
12
05
50
35
00
00
15
15
20
35
05
20
18
00
MG/L
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
.530
.075
.180
.560
.660
.110
.330
.280
.470
.900
.260
,4?0
.990
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L
0.
0.
390
140
0.240
0.
Q.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
460
690
170
860
380
440
250
140
310
250
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
031
015
Oil
078
096
020
024
063
005K
017
044
038
0.092
MG/L
0.
0*
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
007
005K
005K
018
013
005K
0.005K
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
008
005K
006
Oil
007
Oil
MG/L P
0.021
0.016
0.010
0.060
0.065
0.015
0.020
0.040
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.020
0.015
TO
LcSS TH.,M
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3613C1 L53613C1
42 31 30.0 074 59 30.0
UNNAMED CREEK
36 7.5 MILFORO
T/GOODYEAR LAKE
ST HWY 2« RRDG IN MILFORD CENTER
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630 00625
DATE TIME DEPTH NO?&N03 TOT KJEL
FROM OF N-TOTAL N
TO DAY FEET
7?/ll/04 13 15
72/12/03 10 00
73/01/07 09 40
73/02/03 10 10
73/03/04 09 10
73/0^/07 10 10
73/04/21 09 40
73/05/05 10 00
73/05/18 09 58
73/06/09 10 40
73/07/07 09 ?5
73/08/05 10 20
73/C9/08 10 24
73/10/14 12 00
MG/L
0.169
0.036
0.710
0.470
0.730
0.294
0.430
0.260
0.210
0.450
0.470
0.467
0.510
0.1<*7
MG/L
0.230
0.130
0.190
0.400
0.700
0.205
0.270
0.270
2.700
1.200
0.220
0.880
0.805
0.200
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PH05-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.032
0.01P
0.014
0.052
0.132
0.005K
0.009
0.009
0.063
0.050
0.020
0.055
0.105
0.044
MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.010
0.022
0.005K
O.OOSK
0.005K
0.008
0.005K
0.006
0.011
0.008
0.010
MG/L P
0.019
0.012
C.010
0.040
0.080
0.015
0.010
0.015
0.035
0.010
0.015
0.075
0.020
0.010
< ViLUE
L.FSS TH
TO
-------
STOWET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/1l/?6
361301 LS361301
42 31 00.0 074 5$ 30.0
UNNAMED CREEK
?6 7.5
T/GOOOYEAR LAKE
ST HrtY 28 3RDG S OF MILLFOWD CENTER
11EPALES 2111204
* 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/1 1/04
72/12/03
73/01/07
73/02/03
73/03/04
73/04/07
73/04/21
73/05/05
73/05/1 ft
73/06/09
73/07/07
00630 00625
TI^E DEPTH NO?S.N03 TOT KJFL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FFF.T
13
10
09
10
10
09
09
10
10
10
09
21
00
41
14
05
10
45
?0
P5
43
30
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.1<-0
.260
.210
.176
.370
.700
.110
.087
.082
.038
.126
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
100K
100K
100K
350
POO
'60
180
140
600
480
140
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
?.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
023
013
007
044
eoo
005K
010
005K
056
016
Oil
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
005K
005K
005K
007
014
005K
005K
005K
005K
007
005K
MG/L P
0.012
0.005K
0.010
0.035
0.055
0.025
0.005K
0.010
0.020
0.015
0.010
TO Hr_
pi i
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3M3E1 LS3613E1
42 41 00.0 075 55 30.0
RED CREEK
36 7.5 COOPEKSTOWN
T/GOODYEAR LAKE
BRDG NEAR COOPERSTOwfN STP
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
00630 00625
DATE TIME DEPTH NOPS.N03 TOT KJEL
FROM OF N-TOTAL ^
TO DAY FF.ET
72/11/04 H 40
72/12/03 09 10
73/01/07 09 55
73/02/03 09 15
73/03/04 08 30
73/04/07 10 05
73/04/21 09 58
73/05/05 10 05
73/05/18 09 12
73/06/09 10 05
73/07/07 09 10
73/08/05 09 45
73/09/08 09 26
73/10/14 11 26
MG/L
0.550
0.980
1.000
0.570
0.750
0.570
0.480
0.320
0.273
0.210
0.500
0.231
C.168
0.066
MG/L
0.360
0.270
0.370
0.520
1.540
0.320
0.290
0.810
1.320
0.750
0.260
0.320
0.820
O.?00
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L MG/L P
0.042
0.010
0.033
0.105
0.294
0.035
0.008
0.035
0.031
0.005K
0.014
0.063
0.220
0.025
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.014
0.030
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.009
0.005K
0.006
0.005K
0.015
0.007
MG/L P
0.006
0.016
0.015
0.120
0.145
0.020
0.010
0.015
0.080
0.010
0.015
0.020
0.015
0.007
VaLUE K-JOVJtsI TO
SS THAN I
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/27
361350 PD361350 P002380
42 41 00.0 074 56 00.0
COOPERSTOWN
36077 7.5 COOPERSTOWN
T/GOODYEAR LAKE
SUSQUEHANNA RIVER
11EPALES 2141204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/12/27
CP(T>-
72/12/27
73/01/31
CP(T>-
73/01/31
73/03/07
CP(T>-
73/03/07
73/03/30
CP-
73/05/07
73/06/01
CP(T>-
73/06/01
73/07/02
CP(T>-
73/07/02
73/07/31
CP(T)-
73/07/31
73/09/04
CP(T)-
73/09/05
73/09/27
CP(T>-
73/09/27
73/10/31
CP(T)-
73/10/31
73/11/30
CP
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/ll/?7
361350 PU361350 P0023*0
42 41 00.0 074 56 00.0
COQPERSTOWH
36C77 7.5 COOPERSTOWN
T/GOODYEAR LAKF
SUSOUEHANNA RIVER
11EPALES 2141204
x* 0000 FEET DEPTH
00630
DATE TIME DFPTH NO?kN03
FROM OF M-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET Mf^/L
006?5
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
00610
NH1-N
TOTAL
MG/L
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
50051
FLOW
PATE
INST MOD
500b3
CONDUIT
FLOW-MGO
MONTHLY
74/01/07 07 00
CP 30
2.240
6.500
0.420
1.800
2.300
0.740
0.640
------- |