U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
WORKING PAPER SERIES
REPORT
ON
LONG LAKE
HAMILTON COUNTY
NEW YORK
EPA REGION II
WORKING PAPER No, 161
PACIFIC NORTHWEST ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
An Associate Laboratory of the
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - CORVALLIS, OREGON
and
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER - LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
-------
REPORT
ON
LONG LAKE
HAMILTON COUNTY
NEW YORK
EPA REGION II
WORKING PAPER No, 161
WITH THE COOPERATION OF THE
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
AND THE
NEW YORK NATIONAL GUARD
DECEMBER, 1974
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Foreword ii
List of New York Study Lakes iv
Lake and Drainage Area Map v
Sections
I. Conclusions 1
II. Lake and Drainage Basin Characteristics 3
III. Lake Water Quality Summary 4
IV. Nutrient Loadings 8
V. Literature Reviewed 13
VI. Appendices 14
-------
11
FOREWORD
The National Eutrophication Survey was initiated in 1972 in
response to an Administration commitment to investigate the nation-
wide threat of accelerated eutrophication to fresh water lakes and
reservoirs.
OBJECTIVES
The Survey was designed to develop, in conjunction with state
environmental agencies, information on nutrient sources, concentrations,
and impact on selected freshwater lakes as a basis for formulating
comprehensive and coordinated national, regional, and state management
practices relating to point-source discharge reduction and non-point
source pollution abatement in lake watersheds.
ANALYTIC APPROACH
The mathematical and statistical procedures selected for the
Survey's eutrophication analysis are based on related concepts that:
a. A generalized representation or model relating
sources, concentrations, and impacts can be constructed.
b. By applying measurements of relevant parameters
associated with lake degradation, the generalized model
can be transformed into an operational representation of
a lake, its drainage basin, and related nutrients.
c. With such a transformation, an assessment of the
potential for eutrophication control can be made.
LAKE ANALYSIS
In this report, the first stage of evaluation of lake and water-
shed data collected from the study lake and its drainage basin is
documented. The report is formatted to provide state environmental
agencies with specific information for basin planning [§303(e)], water
quality criteria/standards review [§303(c)]» clean lakes [§314(a,b)],
and water quality monitoring [§106 and §305(b)] activities mandated
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972.
-------
*
m
Beyond the single lake analysis, broader based correlations
between nutrient concentrations (and loading) and trophic condi-
tion are being made to advance the rationale and data base for
refinement of nutrient water quality criteria for the Nation's
fresh water lakes. Likewise, multivariate evaluations for the
relationships between land use, nutrient export, and trophic
condition, by lake class or use, are being developed to assist
in the formulation of planning guidelines and policies by EPA
and to augment plans implementation by the states.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The staff of the National Eutrophication Survey (Office of
Research & Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency)
expresses sincere appreciation to the New York Department of
Environmental Conservation for professional involvement and to
the New York National Guard for conducting the tributary sampling
phase of the Survey.
Henry L. Diamond, Commissioner of the New York Department of
Environmental Conservation, and Leo J. Hetling, Director, and
Halo G. Carcich, Senior Sanitary Engineer, Environmental Quality
Research, Department of Environmental Conservation, provided
invaluable lake documentation and counsel during the Survey.
Major General John C. Baker, the Adjutant General of New York,
and Project Officer Lieutenant Colonel Fred Peters, who directed
the volunteer efforts of the New York National Guardsmen, are also
gratefully acknowledged for their assistance to the Survey.
-------
IV
NATIONAL EUTROPHICATION SURVEY
STUDY LAKES
STATE OF NEW YORK
LAKE NAME
Allegheny Reservoir
Black
Canadaigua
Cannonsville
Carry Falls
Cassadaga
Cayuga
Champ!ain
Chautauqua
Conesus
Cross
Goodyear
Huntington
Keuka
Long
Lower St. Regis
Otter
Owasco
Raquette Pond
Round
Sacandaga Res.
Saratoga
Schroon
Seneca
Swan
Swinging Bridge Res.
COUNTY
Cattaraugas, NY; McLean,
Warren, PA
St. Lawrence
Ontario
Delaware
St. Lawrence
Chautauqua
Seneca, Tompkins
Clinton, Essex, NY; Addison,
Chittenden, Franklin, VT
Chautauqua
Livingston
Cayuga, Onondaga
Otsego
Sullivan
Ontario
Hanri 1 ton
Franklin
Cayuga
Cayuga
Franklin
Saratoga
Fulton, Saratoga
Saratoga
Essex, Warren
Seneca, Schyler, Yates
Sullivan
Sullivan
-------
LONG LAKE
Tributary Sampling Site
X Lake Sampling Site
Direct Drainage Area Boundary
' 3 Ml.
-------
LONG LAKE
STORE! NO. 3619
I. CONCLUSIONS
A. Trophic Condition:
Survey data indicate that Long Lake is mesotrophic. Of the
26 New York lakes sampled in the fall of 1972, four had less mean
total phosphorus, only one had less mean dissolved phosphorus, and
five had less mean inorganic nitrogen. For all New York data, four
lakes had less mean chlorophyll a_, and seven had greater Secchi disc
transparency.
B. Rate-Limiting Nutrient:
Significant losses of nutrients occurred in the assay sample
from the time of collection to the beginning of the assay, and the
results are not indicative of lake conditions when the sample was
collected. However, the lake data indicate that the lake was limi-
ted by phosphorus (i.e., N/P ratios on all occasions were equal to
or greater than 36/1).
C. Nutrient Controllability:
1. Phosphorus "loss"During the sampling year, there was an
unexpected apparent loss of phosphorus from Long Lake; i.e., nearly
20% more phosphorus was measured leaving the lake than can be ac-
counted for by all measured and estimated inputs (see page 10).
The cause of the marked phosphorus imbalance is not known, but
it not likely that a phosphorus "wash-out" occurred or that a direct-
discharge point source contributing 3,200 Ibs of phosphorus during
-------
the year was overlooked. Some portion of the "loss" may have been
due to the location of the "outlet" sampling station some five+
stream miles below the actual lake outlet or to the limits of accuracy
of the flow estimates provided by the U.S. Geological Survey, or both.
2. Point source loadsConsidering the phosphorus load leaving
the lake to be at least equivalent to combined input loads, it is
calculated that Long Lake received a total phosphorus load at a rate
9
of 0.54 g/m /yr which is less than that proposed by Vollenweider (in
press) as "permissible"; i.e., an oligotrophic rate (see page 12).
It will be noted that an even more favorable loading rate results
when calculated on the basis of the input loads.
Since the only known point-sources (shoreline septic tanks) con-
tributed less than 2% of the estimated total phosphorus load during
the sampling year, it is concluded that point-source control would
have little effect on the trophic condition of Long Lake.
3. Non-point source loads (see page 12)--During the sampling
year, the phosphorus exports of the Long Lake tributaries were rela-
tively low and compared favorably to the exports of unimpacted New
York streams studied elsewhere.
In all, it is calculated that non-point sources contributed
nearly 99% of the total phosphorus load to Long Lake.
-------
LAKE AND DRAINAGE BASIN CHARACTERISTICS
A. Lake Morphometry :
1. Surface area: 4,090 acres.
2. Mean depth: unknown.
3. Maximum depth: >17 feet.
4. Volume: unknown.
5. Mean hydraulic retention time: unknown.
B. Tributary and Outlet:
(See Appendix A for flow data)
1. Tributaries -
Name
Raquette River
South Pond Outlet
Shaw Brook
Unnamed stream (D-l)
Big Brook
Cold River
Pine Brook
Minor tributaries &
immediate drainage -
Totals
2. Outlet -
Raquette River
C. Precipitation***:
1. Year of sampling: 49.0 inches.
2. Mean annual: 40.0 inches.
Drainage area* Mean flow*
191.0 mi2,
21.3 ml.
5.5 mi«
0.7 mi.
40.0 mi.
84.6 mi.
4.8 mr
116.7 mi2
381.2 cfs
42.5 cfs
11.1 cfs
1.3 cfs
79.7 cfs
168.8 cfs
9.5 cfs
245.5 cfs
464.6 mi* 939.6 cfs
471.0 mi2** 939.6 cfs
1" Greeson and Robison, 1970.
Drainage areas are accurate within ±5%, except for small basins (±10%);
mean daily flows are accurate within ±5 to 25%; and normalized mean
monthly flows are accurate within ±15%.
* Includes area of lake.
** See Working Paper No. 1, "Survey Methods".
-------
III. LAKE WATER QUALITY SUMMARY
Long Lake was sampled three times during the open-water season
of 1972 by means of a pontoon-equipped Huey helicopter. Each time,
samples for physical and chemical parameters were collected from
two stations on the lake and from two or more depths at each station
(see map, page v). During each visit, a single depth-integrated
(15 feet or near bottom to surface) sample was composited from the
two stations for phytoplankton identification and enumeration; and
during the last visit, a single five-gallon depth-integrated sample
was composited for algal assays. Also, the first two visits, a
depth-integrated sample was collected from each of the stations for
chlorophyll a_ analysis. The maximum depths sampled were 11 feet
at station 1 and 17 feet at station 2.
The results obtained are presented in full in Appendix B, and
the data for the fall sampling period, when the lake essentially
was well-mixed, are summarized below. Note, however, the Secchi
disc summary is based on all values.
For differences in the various parameters at the other sampling
times, refer to Appendix B.
-------
A. Physical and chemical characteristics:
Parameter Minimum
Temperature (Cent.) 11.6
Dissolved oxygen (mg/1) 8.8
Conductivity (ymhos) <50
pH (units) 6.6
Alkalinity (mg/1) <10
Total P (mg/1) 0.006
Dissolved P (mg/1) 0.003
N02 + N03 (mg/1) 0.090
Ammonia Tmg/1) 0.060
Secchi disc (inches) 96
FALL VALUES
(10/06/72)
Mean Median
11.7
9.0
<50
6.7
0.009
0.004
0.090
0.068
ALL VALUES
116
11.7
9.1
<50
6.7
0.008
0.004
0.090
0.070
108
Maximum
11.9
9.1
<50
6.8
0.014
0.005
0.100
0.080
166
-------
B. Biological characteristics:
1. Phytoplankton -
Sampling
Date
05/20/72
2.
07/25/72
10/06/72
Domi
nant
Genera
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Dinobryon
Peri dini urn
label! aria
Flagellates
Anabaena
Other genera
Total
Chroococcus
Merismopedia
Raphidiopsis
Flagellates
Scenedesmus
Other genera
Total
Flagellates
Chroococcus
Cyclotella
Anabaena
Melosira
Other genera
Total
Number
per ml
211
175
93
51
45
34
609
265
127
66
63
45
85
651
1,613
Chlorophyll a^ -
(Because of instrumentation problems during the 1972 sampling,
the following values may be in error by plus or minus 20 percent.)
Sampling
Date
05/20/72
07/25/72
Station
Number
01
01
02
Chlorophyll a_
(yg/1)
5.8
2.3
2.3
-------
C. Limiting Nutrient Study:
Because of nutrient loss in the sample, the algal assay
results are not representative of lake conditions at the time
the sample was collected. The lake data indicate that the
lake was limited by phosphorus; i.e., N/P ratios at all samp-
ling times were 36/1 or greater, and phosphorus limitation
would be expected.
-------
8
IV. NUTRIENT LOADINGS
(See Appendix C for data)
For the determination of nutrient loadings, the New York National
Guard collected monthly near-surface grab samples from each of the
tributary sites indicated on the map (page v), except for the high
runoff months of April and May when two samples were collected. Samp-
ling was begun in November, 1972, and was completed in June, 1973.
Through an interagency agreement, stream flow estimates for the
year of sampling and a "normalized" or average year were provided by
the New York District Office of the U.S. Geological Survey for the
tributary sites nearest the lake.
In this report, nutrient loads for sampled tributaries were
determined by using a modification of a U.S. Geological Survey computer
program for calculating stream loadings*. Nutrient loadings for unsam-
pled "minor tributaries and immediate drainage" ("ZZ" of U.S.G.S.) and
tributaries F-l and G-l were estimated by using the means of the nu-
2
trient loads, in Ibs/mi /year, in South Pond outlet, Shaw Brook, Unnamed
Brook, and Big Brook at stations B-l, C-l, D-l, and E-l and multiplying
2
by the ZZ or appropriate tributary area in mi .
The original outlet sampling site for Long Lake was at Axton Landing,
approximately ten miles north of the actual lake outlet location. One
tributary sampled, Cold River, does not impact Long Lake but does con-
tribute to the Raquette River outlet loadings. Nutrient loadings from
* See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
this tributary, plus estimated loadings from the watershed surrounding
the ten miles to Axton Landing, were subtracted from the outlet loading
figures which originally had been computed by the program noted above.
Other than septic tanks, there were no known point sources impacting
Long Lake during the sampling year.
-------
10
A. Annual Total Phosphorus Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
IDS P/ % of
Source %r total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Raquette River 7,620 46.5
South Pond Outlet 420 2.6
Shaw Brook 420 2.6
Unnamed Brook (D-l) 30 0.2
Big Brook 1,570 9.6
Pine Brook 200 1.2
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 5,300 32.3
c. Known municipal - None
d. Septic tanks* - 200 1.2
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 640 3.8
Total 16,400 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Raquette River 19,600
3. Net annual P loss - 3,200 pounds
* Estimate based on 316 lakeside residences; see Working Paper No. 1
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
11
B. Annual Total Nitrogen Loading - Average Year:
1. Inputs -
Ibs N/ % of
Source yr total
a. Tributaries (non-point load) -
Raquette River 654,540 44.2
South Pond Outlet 79,620 5.4
Shaw Brook 22,310 1.5
Unnamed Brook (D-l) 3,040 0.2
Big Brook 156,890 10.6
Pine Brook 19,180 1.3
b. Minor tributaries & immediate
drainage (non-point load) - 497,080 33.6
c. Known municipal - None
d. Septic tanks* - 7,430 0.5
e. Known industrial - None
f. Direct precipitation** - 39,400 2.7
Total 1,479,490 100.0
2. Outputs -
Lake outlet - Raquette River 1,422,100
3. Net annual N accumulation - 57,390 pounds
* Estimate based on 316 lakeside residences; see Working Paper No. 1
** See Working Paper No. 1.
-------
12
C. Mean Annual Non-point Nutrient Export by Subdrainage Area:
Tributary Ibs P/mi2/yr Ibs N/mi2/yr
Raquette River 40 3,427
South Pond Outlet 20 3,738
Shaw Brook 76 4.056
Unnamed Brook (D-l) 43 4,343
Big Brook 39 3,922
D. Yearly Loading Rates:
In the following table, the existing phosphorus loading
rates, based on input loads, are compared to those proposed
by Vollenweider (in press). Essentially, his "dangerous"
rate is the rate at which the receiving water would become
eutrophic or remain eutrophic; his "permissible" rate is that
which would result in the receiving water remaining oligotro-
phic or becoming oligotrophic if morphometry permitted. A
mesotrophic rate would be considered one between "dangerous"
and "permissible".
Total Phosphorus Total Nitrogen
Units
Ibs/acre/yr
grams/m2/yr
Total
4.0
0.45
Accumulated
loss*
Total
361.7
40.5
Accumulated
14.0
1.6
Vollenweider loading rates for phosphorus
(g/m2/yr) based on surface area and mean
outflow of Long Lake:
"Dangerous" (eutrophic rate) 1.36
"Permissible" (oligotrophic rate) 0.68
* See discussion on pages 1 and 2.
-------
13
V. LITERATURE REVIEWED
Greeson, Phillip E., and F. Luman Robison, 1970. Characteristics
of New York lakes. Part 1 - Gazateer of lakes, ponds, and
reservoir. Bull. 68, U.S. Dept. Int. and NY Dept. Env. Cons.,
Albany.
Vollenweider, Richard A. (in press). Input-output models. Schweiz,
A. Hydro!.
-------
VII. APPENDICES
APPENDIX A
TRIBUTARY FLOW DATA
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR NEW YORK
11/26/74
LAKE CODE 3619
LONG LAKE
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE ATI.00
SUB-DRAINAGE
TRIBUTARY AREA
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
NORMALIZED FLOWS
JUN JUL AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
DEC
MEAN
3619AI
3619A2
3619B1
3619C1
3619D1
3619E1
3619FI
3619G1
3619ZZ
191.00
471.00
21.30
5.55
0.68
40.00
84.60
4.75
123.12
229.00
563.68
25.50
6.65
0.81
47.90
101.00
5.69
147.00
17ft. 00
437.75
19.80
5.17
0.63
37.20
78. PO
4.42
115.00
349.00
860.51
38.90
10.10
1.24
73.10
155.00
8.68
225.00
1170.00
2878.38
130.00
33.90
4.16
244.00
517.00
29.00
752.00
866.00
2138.79
96.50
25.20
3.08
181.00
384.00
21.50
558.00
336.00
828.53
37*50
9.77
1.20
70.40
149*00
8.36
217.00
183.00
450.75
20.40
5.32
0.65
38.30
81.10
4.55
118.00
153.00
377.79
17.10
4.46
0.55
32.10
68.00
3.82
98.90
185.00
455.74
20.60
5.37
0.66
38.70
81.90
4.60
119.00
264.00
651.63
29.50
7.68
0.94
55*40
117.00
6.57
170.00
371.00
915.48
41.40
10.80
1.32
77.80
164.00
9.24
239.00
288.00
710.60
32.20
8.38
1.03
60.40
128.00
7.17
186.00
381.19
939.64
42.47
11.07
1.36
79.73
168.82
9.47
245.53
SUMMARY
TOTAL DRAINAGE AREA OF LAKE - 471.00
SUM OF SUB-DPAINAGE AREAS = 471.00
TOTAL FLOW IN
TOTAL FLOW OUT
11269.96
11269.61
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR
3619A1
MEAN FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW DAY
FLOW
3619A2
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
536.00
310.00
440.00
330.00
925.00
1160.00
919.00
340.00
258.00
135.00
170.00
99.70
1320.00
764.00
1080.00
812.00
2280.00
2870.00
2270.00
839.00
637.00
335.00
419.00
246.00
4
2
5
6
4
15
5
3
14
18
7
13
4
2
6
3
3
15
5
2
7
18
8
13
617.00
326.00
632.00
740.00
110.00
370.00
865.00
420.00
133.00
120.00
132.00
89.60
1520.00
805.00
1200.00
971.00
253.00
913.00
2130.00
1210.00
746.00
297.00
351.00
221.00
18
1240.00
19
6130.00
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FOR NEW YORK
11/26/74
LAKE CODE 3M9
LONG LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
361981
3619C1
361901
3619E1
11
12
1
>
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
>
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
i
?
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
?
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
FLOW DAY
59.80
34.60
49.00
36.70
103.00
129.00
102.00
38.00
28.80
IS. 10
18.90
11.10
15.60
9.01
12.80
9.59
26.80
33.80
26.70
9.89
7.51
3.94
4.93
?.90
1.91
1.11
1.57
1.17
3.28
4.14
3.27
1.21
0.92
0.48
0.61
0.36
11?. 00
64.90
9?. 10
69.00
194.00
243.00
192.00
71.20
54.10
?«.40
35.50
?0.90
4
2
5
6
4
15
5
3
14
18
7
13
4
2
6
6
4
15
5
3
14
18
7
13
4
2
5
6
4
15
5
3
14
19
7
13
4
2
5
6
4
15
5
3
14
19
7
13
86.50
45.60
38.50
104.00
15.50
44.50
83.50
39.00
19.70
18.80
19.40
16.40
19.20
10.20
15.20
23.00
3.50
8.90
3.60
9.40
5.92
5.75
5.95
5.20
2.17
1.15
2.22
2.64
0.39
1.30
3.04
1.48
0.47
0.41
0.47
0.31
129.00
68.30
132.00
155.00
23.10
77.50
181.00
87.90
?7.90
24.60
27.70
18.70
FLOW DAY
FLOW
18
115.00
18
17.00
16
4.38
16
260.00
-------
TRIBUTARY FLOW INFORMATION FO* NEW YORK
11/26/7
LAKE CODE
LONG LAKE
MEAN MONTHLY FLOWS AND DAILY FLOWS
TRIBUTARY MONTH YEAR MEAN FLOW DAY
3619F1
3619G1
3619ZZ
11
12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
2
3
A
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
1
?
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
72
72
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
73
FLOW DAY
P37.00
138.00
194.00
146.00
411.00
515.00
407.00
151.00
114.00
60.20
75.20
44.20
13.30
7.71
10.90
8.19
23.00
28.90
22.80
8.46
6.40
3.38
4.22
2.48
345.00
200.00
283.00
213.00
596.00
749.00
592.00
?20.00
167.00
87.50
109.00
64.20
4
2
5
6
4
15
5
4
2
5
6
4
15
5
4
2
5
6
4
15
5
3
14
18
7
13
273.00
145.00
280.00
328.00
48.90
164.00
383.00
15.30
8.10
15.70
18.40
2.75
9.19
21.50
398.00
210.00
407.00
477.00
71.20
239.00
557.00
271.00
85.90
77.60
85.30
57.70
FLOW DAY
FLOW
551.00
18
30.90
18
802.00
-------
APPENDIX B
PHYSICAL and CHEMICAL DATA
-------
STORET RFTRIFVAL OATF 74/11/?6
361901
43 58 12.0 074 26 00.0
LONG LAKE
36 NErt YOkK
DATE TIME DEPTH WATER
FROM OF
TO DAY FEET
7P/05/20 09 05 0000
09 05 0011
72/07/25 1? 00 0000
12 00 0004
12 00 0010
72/10/10 la 14 0000
14 14 0004
11F.PALES
3
2111202
0016 FEET
DEPTH
01
ER
MP
NT
13
10
?3
?3
1 1
0
.4
,<5
>w
.7
.6
00300
DO
MG/L
9.6
9.6
7.2
6.6
«.8
00077
TRANSP
SECCHI
INCHES
99
108
96
00094
CNDUCTVY
FIELD
MICROMHO
50
50
50K
50K
50K
50K
00400
Pri
SU
5.40
7.30
7.10
7.10
6.65
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
00630
NO?*.N03
N-TOTAL
MG/L
0.300
0.330
0.150
0.140
0.100
0.090
0.100
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.070
0.080
0.080
0.100
0.040
0.070
0.080
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.008
0.008
0.008
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
00666
PHOS-DIS
MG/L P
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.004
0.005
3?217
DATE - TIME DEPTH ChLRPHYL
FHOM OF A
TO DAY FEET UG/L
7P/05/20 09 05 0000 5.8J
7?/07/25 12 00 0000 2.3J
VflLUE KNOWN TO BE LESS
THIN INDICATED
J VaLUt KNO^N TO BE IN ER^OR
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/1l/?6
361902
44 02 30.0 074 21 06.G
LONG LAKE
36
ll^PALES
3
DATF
FROM
TO
7P/05/20
7?/07/?5
7?/10/10
00010
TIME DEPTH *4TER
OF TtMP
DAY FFET
09
09
11
11
11
13
13
13
34
34
40
40
40
45
45
45
0000
0017
0000
0004
0010
0000
0004
0011
CENT
13.
6.
23.
23.
11.
11.
00300
no
00077 00094
TRANSP CNDUCTVY
SECCHI FIFLO
MG/L INCHES MIC^OMHO
4
5
2
0
9
7
9.
10.
7.
7.
Q.
9.
5 120
6
108
4
4
166
1
1
50
50
50K
50K
50K
SOK
50K
SOK
00400
f H
su
5.
5.
7,
7.
7.
6.
6.
6.
40
40
80
80
80
60
70
75
8111202
00?0 FEET
DEPTH
00410
T ALK
CAC03
MG/L
10K
IOK
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
10K
00630
NOP&N03
N-TOTAL
MO/L
0.300
0.360
0.150
0.150
O.lf>0
0.090
0.090
0.090
OOMO
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.080
0.090
0.070
0.060
0.090
0.060
0.060
0.070
0066S
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.007
0.006
0.012
0.009
0.007
0.006
0.008
0.014
00666
PHOS-i>IS
MG/L P
0.004
0.005
0.008
0.005
0.006
0.005
0.003
0.003
DATE TIME DEPTH CHL^DHVL
FROM OF A
TO DAY FFFT tir,/|_
7P/07/25 11 40 0000
2.3J
K VALU- ^^JO*M TO dC
IMOICflTFt)
J VGLUE Ki^OWN TO HE I*
-------
APPENDIX C
TRIBUTARY DATA
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3619A1 LS3619A1
A3 55 30.0 074 28 30.0
RAQUETTE RIVER
36 15 BLUE MTN
I/LONG LAKECHAMILTON CO)
BAN* OF LOT DUTY RD
IIE^ALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/04
72/12/02
73/01/05
73/02/06
73/03/04
73/03/31
73/04/15
73/05/05
73/05/18
73/06/03
73/07/14
73/08/18
73/09/07
73/10/13
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02R.N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
09
10
09
10
15
09
11
19
12
14
14
16
11
15
30
40
45
30
00
30
00
00
00
00
00
30
30
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
104
147
220
294
360
310
273
252
470
231
132
085
160
070
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
1.
0.
230
440
730
190
270
520
630
270
400
P20
390
200
680
420
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
035
024
060
036
044
023
0.014
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
022
007
019
082
147
920
095
MG/L P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.005K
.005K
.OObK
.006
.005K
.005K
.005K
.005K
.005K
.005K
.005K
.005K
.008
.005K
MG/L P
0.022
0.017
0.005K
0.006
0.010
0.005K
0.005K
0.015
0.005K
0.014
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.010
K VALUE KNOW"! TO riF
LESS THAN INDICATED
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/H/?6
3619A2 LS3619A2
44 12 00.0 074 19 30.0
RAOUETTE RIVER
36 15 LONG LAKE
0/LONG LAKE
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3619B1 LS3619B1
43 56 00.0 074 28 00.0
SOUTH POND OUTLET
36 IS BLUE MTN
T/LONG LK(HAMILTON CO)
MFD DUTY RD BROG IN DEERLANO
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/04
72/12/02
73/02/06
73/03/04
73/03/31
73/04/15
73/05/05
73/05/18
73/06/03
73/0 7/1 A
73/08/18
73/09/07
73/10/13
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02&N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
11
09
10
15
09
11
19
12
14
12
16
13
40
45
04
00
30
00
00
00
30
00
30
00
MG/L
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0.
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
0,
,117
,280
,5^0
,690
,730
,720
,540
,470
,440
.250
,170
,147
,126
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
230
310
200
050
300
840
660
600
940
210
660
540
690
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
*
075
038
094
083
032
033
012
018
023
039
126
120
240
MG/L P MG/L P
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.006
0.005
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
0.005K
K VALUE KNOWM TO <-<£
LFSS TH;\fg
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/1l/?6
3619C1 LS3619C1
43 58 00.0 074 25 30.0
SHAW BROOK
36 15 BLUE MTN
T/LONG LAKE(HAMILTON C0>
ST HWY 30 8RDG IN LONG LAKE
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/04
72/12/02
73/01/06
73/02/06
73/03/04
73/03/31
73/04/15
73/05/05
73/05/18
73/06/03
73/07/14
73/08/18
73/09/07
73/10/13
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02S.N03 TOT KJFL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAV FEET
13
11
10
10
10
14
10
11
19
12
14
13
16
11
15
15
50
15
15
30
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.260
.357
.480
.510
.440
.440
.370
.280
.340
.180
.154
.168
.120
.132
MG/L
0.270
0.540
0.420
1.050
0.420
0.240
1.050
0.585
0.630
1.100
0.450
1.000
1.980
0.540
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
*
069
110
056
080
100
054
069
029
016
052
050
044
730
105
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
C.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
p
005K
Oil
006
007
008
005K
005K
006
005K
007
005K
006
006
005K
MG/L P
0.010
0.018
0.009
0.020
0.020
0.025
0.015
0.010
0.015
0.025
0.020
0.030
0.035
DEPTH
K
LESS
KNOWN TO ar;
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
361901 LS3619D1
43 59 30.0 074 24 00.0
UNNAMED CREEK
36 15 SLUE MTN
T/LONG LAKE
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
3619E1 LS3619E1
44 00 00.0 074 29 00.0
BIG BROOK
36 15 LONG LAKE
T/LONG LAKE(HAMILTON CO)
ST HWY 10 8RDG
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET DEPTH
DATE
FROM
TO
72/11/04
72/12/02
73/01/05
73/0?/06
73/03/04
73/04/01
73/04/15
73/05/05
73/05/18
73/06/03
73/07/14
73/08/19
73/09/07
73/10/13
00630 00625
TIME DEPTH N02^N03 TOT KJEL
OF N-TOTAL N
DAY FEET
16
11
14
10
11
10
10
11
19
14
09
15
16
10
00
30
00
30
00
00
15
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.091
.ISO
.315
.380
.430
.378
.320
.010*
.190
.231
.0^6
.044
.036
.066
MG/L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
.340
.720
.440
.230
.370
.520
.880
.560
.580
.400
.540
.600
.850
.320
00610 00671 00665
NH3-N PHOS-DIS PHOS-TOT
TOTAL ORTHO
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
063
038
039
038
061
019
050
0.011
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
016
029
066
054
840
590
MG/L
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
P
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
005K
006
MG/L P
0.007
0.005K
0.010
0.010
0.010
0.020
0.005K
0.005K
0.010
0.010
0.015
0.010
0.015
0.010
K VALUE KNOrtN TO HE
LESS THAN
-------
STORE! RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH NO?f.N03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET MG/L
72/11/04 14 35
0.480
3619F1 LS3619F1
44 05 30.0 074 16 00.0
COLD RIVER
36 15 LONG LAKE
T/LONG LAKE(HAMILTON CO)
WOLF LAKE RO 8ROG
11EPALES 2111204
4 0000 FEET
DEPTH
00625
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.120
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.034
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.005K
K y/flLUF KNOWN TO P£
LESS TH/sN INDICATED
-------
STORET RETRIEVAL DATE 74/11/26
00630
DATE TIME DEPTH N02S.N03
FROM OF N-TOTAL
TO DAY FEET MG/L
72/11/04 15 00
0 , 19-R
006?«5
TOT KJEL
N
MG/L
0.325
00610
NH3-N
TOTAL
MG/L
0.053
3619G1 LS3619G1
44 04 00.0 074 15 30.0
PINE BROOK
36 IS LONG LAKE
T/LONG LAKE(HAMILTON C0>
WOLF LAKE RD BRDG
11EPALES 2111204
^ 0000 FEET
DEPTH
00671
PHOS-DIS
ORTHO
MG/L P
0.005K
00665
PHOS-TOT
MG/L P
0.007
K VALUE KNOWN in HE
LESS THAN INDICATED
------- |