FEDERAL WATER QUALITY ADMINISTRATION
            NORTHWEST REGIONAL OFFICE
                                October • 1970

-------
An Evaluation of Salmonid Hatchery Wastes
               Prepared by
            Danforth G. Bodien
 Technical Assistance and Investigations
     U.S. Department of the Interior
   Federal Mater Quality Administration
             Northwest Region
             Portland, Oregon
              October, 1970

-------
                          TABLE  OF CONTENTS

                                                              Page No.

"INTRODUCTION  	      1
   Problem	      1
   Authority	      2
   Scope	      2
   Objectives  	      2
   Acknowledgements  	      4

SUMMARY	      5
   Findings and  Conclusions  	      5
   Recommendations	      6

HATCHERIES .SURVEYED.  .  .-	      7
   Salmon Cultural Laboratory  	      7
   Eagle Creek National  Fish Hatchery 	      8
   Little White  Salmon National Fish Hatchery 	      9
   Dworshak National Fish  Hatchery	     10

SAMPLING PROGRAM AND ANALYTICAL  METHODS	     13

WASTE CHARACTERISTICS	     17
   Physical-Chemical Characteristics	     17
   Total Waste Load	     29

EFFECTS ON WATER QUALITY  	     31
   Physical-Chemical Effects	     31
   Biological  Effects  	     33

TREATMENT METHODS AND NEEDS	     39
   Water Reconditioning/Reuse  System	     39
   Other Treatment Methods	     44
   Design Criteria	     45

DEFINITION OF TERMS	     49

BIBLIOGRAPHY  	     51

APPENDIX	     53
   Letter of Request	     55

-------
                           LIST OF FIGURES
Figure                                                       Page No.
  1   Location of Salmonid Hatcheries in the Pacific
      Northwest Indicating Those Surveyed	      3
  2   Diurnal  Temperature Curves for Five Stations  at the
      Eagle Creek Hatchery	     19
  3   Diurnal  Dissolved Oxygen Curves for Five Stations at
      the "Eagle "Creek Hatchery	     20
  4   Diurnal  Dissolved Oxygen Curves for Upper Pond
      Influent and Effluent at the Eagle Creek Hatchery.  . .     21
  5   Diurnal  Total  Coliform Counts for Five Stations at
      the Eagle Creek Hatchery.	     24
  6   Filter Backwash Mater BOD Curves 	     27
  7   Schematic Drawing of a Typical  Controlled Environment
      System for Rearing Salmonids (4) . .-	     41
  8   Design Drawing of a Water Reclamation Filger  (4)  ...     42

-------
                            LIST OF TABLES
Table                                                        Page No.
  1   Hatchery Sampling Sites	    14
  2   Waste Loading Factors of Hatcheries Surveyed with
      Reconditioning/Reuse		    22
  3   Waste Characteristics of Oyster Shell Filter Backwash
      Water. .	    26
  4   Removal Efficiencies of Settling for Backwash Water. .    28
  5   Hatchery Discharge- Effects on Water Quality of
      Eagle Creek	    32
  6   Hatchery Discharge Effects on Water Quality of
      Abernathy Creek	    34
  7   Eagle Creek Biological  Data	    35
  8   Oyster Shell  Filter Waste Treatment.	    43

-------
                              INTRODUCTION

                               Problem
     Throughout the Northwest Region 114 State and Federal hatcheries
 produce an estimated 8.6 million pounds of salmonid fish annually.
 In addition, the Region contains numerous private hatcheries and fish
 farms.  In the Hagerman Valley alone such hatcheries produce over 4.5
 million pounds annually with a developmental potential of 20 million
 pounds.  Large quantities of water are utilized in raising fish,
 and generally the water used is discharged without treatment to the
 receiving stream.  In most cases no problems have been associated
 with this method of operation.  Within the past few years, during low
 summer flows, however, wastes discharged from some hatcheries have
 created nuisance conditions in receiving waters.  These conditions
 prompted the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries (BCF) and the Bureau of
 Sport Fisheries and Wildlife (BSF & W) to seek assistance from the
 Federal Water Quality Administration (FWQA, formerly Federal  Water
 Pollution Control Administration) to define the problem and recommend
 methods for correction.
     Problems associated with hatchery discharges are not unique to
 the Pacific Northwest.  Investigations in other parts of the country
 have dealt with similar problems.  Data from these studies were used
when applicable.

-------
2
                              Authori ty
     Section 5(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as
 amended, and Executive Order No. 11507 authorizes FWQA to assist
 Federal agencies with waste disposal problems.
     In a  letter dated December 24, 1968, the Program Director of
 BCF  requested the Regional Director, FWQA, Northwest Region to con-
 duct a survey of hatchery pollution problems.  (Appendix).

                                Scope
     The study area, illustrated in Figure 1, included the States of
 Idaho, Oregon, Washington and western Montana.  Primary attention was
 given to four hatcheries which were selected as representative of
 hatcheries in the study area, Eagle Creek National Fish Hatchery,
 near Estacada, Oregon; Abernathy Creek Salmon Cultural Laboratory,
 near Longview, Washington; Little White Salmon National Fish Hatchery,
 near White Salmon, Washington; and Dworshak National Fish Hatchery
 at Asahka, Idaho.  All four of these hatcheries are operated by
 BSF & W.

                              Objectives
     The objectives of the study were to answer the following
 questions:
     1.  What is the total  waste load produced by fish hatcheries in
         the study area?
     2.  What are the waste characteristics of fish hatchery
         effluents?

-------
               SALMON CULTURAL LABORATORY
                                                       DWORSHAK NATIONAL FISH HATCHERY
                                                               1 ll     ~&
LITTLE WHITE SALMON
       NATIONAL FISH HATCHERT
                   EAGLE CREEK NATIONAL
                       FISH HATCHERY
                                          N  E  VkA D> '?
                                               *-      —
   FEDERALLY  OPERATED HATCHERY
   STATE OPERATED HATCHERY
                                                                         UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT Of THE INTERIOR
                                                                         F«d»rel Wottr Pollu11or> Conrrol Admimitratien
                                                                         durg 6/-fey   POHtLANQ, OREGON
                                        Figure 1
Location  of Salmonid Hatcheries in the  Pacific Northwest  Indicating Those Surveyed

-------
4
     3.  What effect does the discharge of hatchery wastes have on
         receiving waters?
     4.  What methods are available for controlling wastes from fish
         hatcheries?

                           Acknowledgements
     Acknowledgement is made of the valuable assistance and guidance
provided by the BSF & W and the BCF.
     Thanks are expressed also to the personnel at the four hatcheries
surveyed.

-------
                               SUMMARY
                       Findings and Conclusions
1.   Approximately 23 tons of Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD), with
     a population equivalent of approximately 270,000, are discharged
     per day by the 114 Federal and State hatcheries in the study
     area.
2.   Waste concentrations of hatchery effluents are small; however,
     total pounds discharged per day can be of significant magnitude.
3.   Hatchery discharges increase Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), total
     phosphorus (TP), orthophosphate, total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN)
     and ammonia nitrogen by 2.0, .036, .015, .20, and .058 lbs/100
     Ibs fish/day, respectively.
4.   Hatchery discharges can result in increased productivity in
     receiving waters.
5.   Hatchery discharges can increase the coliform bacteria count in
     receiving waters to a small degree.
6.   The discharge of waste resulting from the flushing of raceways
     adds large amounts of solids and BOD to receiving waters.
7.   Fish hatchery wastes are extremely amenable to biological treat-
     ment.
8.   The quantity and pollutional effects of hatchery wastes can be
     greatly reduced when a water reconditioning/reuse system, in-
     cluding sedimentation of skimming and backwash water is utilized.
9.   A water reconditioning/reuse system employing an oyster shell

-------
     filter converts virtually all of the ammonia nitrogen to the
     nitrate and nitrate forms, as well as stabilizing pH, and
     removing a portion of the solids.
10.  Approximately 92 percent of BOD, 89 percent of suspended solids
     (SS), 76 percent of TKN, and 84 percent of TP can be removed
     from filter backwash water with 30 minutes of settling.   These
     removal efficiencies exceed the requirements for secondary
     treatment.
11.  The impact of hatchery discharges depends upon the quantity and
     quality of the receiving water.

                           Recommendations
     Hatcheries must be considered as a waste source.   Water pollution
control measures should be considered for new hatcheries and at
existing hatcheries on a priority basis.  Discharges from Federal
fish hatcheries must comply with applicable water quality standards
in accordance with Executive Order 11507.

-------
                         HATCHERIES SURVEYED

                      Salmon Cultural Laboratory
     The Salmon Cultural Laboratory operated as a research hatchery
by the BSF & W, is located on Abernathy Creek, near Longview,
Washington.
     About 22,000 pounds of fall chinook are raised annually at the
Salmon Cultural Laboratory.  In addition, research is carried out
in areas such as fish diet, fish stamina, water supply, water steri-
lization, etc.  One major development emanating from the laboratory
was a water reconditioning/reuse system developed by Burrows (4).
The system employs three 750 sg. ft. oyster shell filters which
biologically convert the ammonia (NH3) in the water to nitrates
(N03-).  The water from the filter is then passed through an
aeration tower which strips out the carbon dioxide (C02) and adds
dissolved oxygen (DO).  Discussion of this reconditioning/reuse
system is presented in the section entitled "Treatment Methods and
Needs."
     The Salmon Cultural Laboratory obtains its water from wells.
The water is aerated, filtered for iron removal, and then heated or
cooled to bring the total sytem to the optimum temperature for fish
production.  The make-up water at the Salmon Cultural Laboratory runs
about 5 percent, or 90 gallons per minute (gpm) for the 1800 gpm
system.

-------
8
     Wastes from the Salmon Cultural Laboratory, consisting of 5
percent of the  raceway effluent and backwash from the oyster shell
filters,  are discharged without treatment into Abernathy Creek.
     The  Salmon Cultural Laboratory uses automatic feeders.  These
disperse  feed at 15-minute intervals.  While moist pellets are used
at  the present, a  change to dry pellets is planned for the near
future.   The possible effects of this change on water quality are
not known.
                   Eagle Creek National Fish Hatchery
     The  Eagle  Creek National Fish Hatchery is located on Eagle
Creek, a  tributary of the Clackamas River, 13 miles east of Estacada,
Oregon.
     This hatchery has two sections.  The upper section consists of
three banks of  rearing ponds, each with 12 raceways.  The lower
section includes the hatchery, three banks of rearing ponds, each
with 13 raceways,  plus the fish ladder, holding pond, and spawning
facilities.
     Water for  this hatchery is obtained solely from Eagle Creek and
is  used without treatment.  Obtaining an adequate supply from this
source is a large  problem at the hatchery, especially during the dry
summer months.  When the water supply becomes extremely low, fresh
water is  added  only at the head end of the upper section, and the
water passes in series through both the upper and lower sections
before discharge.  When the water supply is normal, each raceway

-------
                                                                  9
receives fresh water.   Water temperature is also a problem at the
hatchery, as low winter temperatures severely retard fish growth.
     Wastes from the rearing ponds, holding pond, and hatchery room
are discharged without treatment into Eagle Creek.
     During 1969, 46,000 pounds of silver salmon, 43,000 pounds of
spring chinook salmon, and 27,000 pounds of steelhead were raised at
the Eagle Creek Hatchery.  The heaviest fish load at the hatchery is
during late summer and early fall.
     The feed used at the Eagle Creek Hatchery is a moist pellet.
Feeding is accomplished by hand, and frequency of feeding varies
from hourly for small  fish to two or three times a day for larger
fish.

              Little White Salmon National Fish Hatchery
     The Little White Salmon National Fish Hatchery, is located in
the State of Washington on the Little White Salmon River about one
mile above its confluence with the Columbia River.
     The facility has  two sections.  The upper section is composed
of the fish ladder, holding ponds, spawning facilities, and 41 rear-
ing ponds.  The lower section includes the hatchery room, six rearing
ponds, and a water reconditioning/reuse system.  The water recon-
ditioning/reuse 'system is used only for the hatching of eggs.  It
consists of three rearing ponds converted to oyster shell filters and
an aeration tower.

-------
10
     The hatchery utilizes three water supply sources: two springs
and  the Little White Salmon River.  This water is used without treat-
ment.  Fish are  reared in spring water and converted to river water
before release.  Water supply at the hatchery has never been a problem
from the standpoint of either quantity or quality, and all ponds are
run  on a once-through basis.
     The wastes  from the rearing ponds, holding ponds, and the
hatchery room are discharged without treatment into Drano Lake, a
backwater on the Little White Salmon.
     During the year 1969, 70,000 pounds of fall chinook, 13,000
pounds of spring chinook and 32,000 pounds of silver salmon were
raised at the Little White Salmon National Fish Hatchery.  The
heaviest fish load at the hatchery is from December to January.
During summer months only 20 of the total 56 rearing ponds are uti-
lized; however, the same pond loadings are used as during months of
heavy loads.  These loadings run from 7 to 12 pounds of fish per
cubic foot of tank, with a flow of approximately 470 gpm per tank.
     The feed used at the hatchery is the moist pellet.   Feeding is
done by hand about twice per day.

                   Dworshak National  Fish Hatchery
     Dworshak National  Fish Hatchery is  located in Asahka, Idaho, at
the mouth  of the North  Fork Clearwater River.
     This  facility,  less  than  a  year old,  is  the  largest  hatchery
presently  utilizing  a water reconditioning/reuse  system.   The  hatchery

-------
                                                                   11
 has 84 rearing ponds,  25  of which  are  on the  reuse  system.   The
 ultimate  plan  calls  for 50 ponds on  reuse and 34  on river water.
 Eight oyster shell  filters,  each with  a  surface area of  1650 sq.  ft.
 are used  for treatment of the  rearing  pond effluent.   Eight  additional
 filters are  planned  for the  25 ponds to  be added  to the  reuse system.
      Water for make-up in the  reuse  system and for  the ponds  not  on
 the system comes  from  the North Fork Clearwater River.   Make-up
 water for the  reuse  system is  filtered and sterilized with ultra-
 violet light before  it is  combined with  the reconditioned water from
 the oyster shell  filters.  At  the present time, the make-up water
 constitutes  ten percent of the total water in  the system.
      Backwash  water  from  the oyster shell  filters,  hatchery  room
 wastes, and  effluent from the  rearing  ponds not on  the water  reuse
 system is discharged without treatment into the North Fork Clearwater
 River.
      Although  the hatchery has not operated for a full year, the
 calculated production  for  fiscal year  1970 is 295,000 pounds.  For
 fiscal years 1971 and  1972, production is estimated at 520,000 and
 620,000 pounds, respectively.  The majority of fish raised are
 steel head; rainbow trout make up the rest.
     Dworshak uses an automatic feeding system.  Moist pellettzed
 food ts now used; however, a conversion to a dry pellet is expected
 in the near future.   Frequency of  feeding varies with the size of  the
 fish, ranging from once an hour for small fish to  four times  per day
for the large fish.

-------
               SAMPLING PROGRAM AND ANALYTICAL METHODS

     Sampling sites were selected to determine incremental  changes
in the water quality through individual  rearing ponds, a group of
ponds, or the hatchery as a whole.  Table 1 lists the sampling sites.
Stream sampling was done above and below two hatcheries to measure
pollutional effects and stream recovery.
     For the most part, grap samples were taken for analysis.   One
24-hour composite was made with physical-chemical samples taken every
two hours and bacteriological samples taken every four hours.
     Biological sampling was done in the receiving stream above and
below Eagle Creek Hatchery to assess the effects of hatchery dis-
charges on the aquatic community.  Biological.samples were collected
with a Surber-  sampler, preserved in the field with ten percent
formalin, and returned to Portland to be identified and enumerated.
     Physical-chemical and bacteriological samples were collected
with a Kemmerer sampler.  The bacteriological samples were iced and
sent to the FWQA, Pacific Northwest .Water Laboratory (PNWL) in
Corvallis, Oregon, or returned to Portland to be incubated and
analyzed.  During the 24-hour composite, bacteriological samples
were incubated and analyzed in the field.
     Dissolved oxygen and temperature were measured in the field.
     V Use of product and company names is for identification only
and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Department of the
Interior or the FWQA.

-------
14
                               TABLE 1

                       HATCHERY SAMPLING SITES
Abernathy Creek Salmon Cultural Laboratory

     Station  1  Well water after treatment
              2  Rearing Pond effluent - influent to filter
              3  Filter effluent
              4  Aeration tower effluent
              5  Filter backwash water
              6  Abernathy Creek above hatchery
              7  Abernathy Creek - 30 yards below hatchery
              8  Abernathy Creek - 3 miles below hatchery

Eagle  Creek National Fish Hatchery

     Station  1  Hatchery influent water
              2  Upper Pond effluent
              3  Lower Pond effluent
              4  Eagle Creek between Upper and Lower Ponds, below
                upper bridge
              5  Eagle Creek - 50 yards below hatchery, below lower
                bri dge
              6  Eagle Creek - 3.4 miles below hatchery

Little White  Salmon National Fish Hatchery

     Station  1  Upper pond influent
              2  Upper pond effluent
              3  Spring Water
            •  4  Lower pond influent
              5  Lower pond effluent

Dworshak National  Fish Hatchery

     Station  1  Hatchery influent before treatment
              2  Hatchery influent after treatment
              3  Rearing pond effluent - influent to filter
              4  Filter effluent
              5  Filter backwash water

-------
                                                                  15
The Alsterberg (Azide) modification of the Winkler Method'was  used
for DO determinations and a laboratory thermometer was  used  for
temperature.
     All other samples were sent to the PNWL for analysis.   Nutrient
samples were  preserved in the field with mercuric chloride  (HgCl2).
COO and Total Organic Carbon (TOC)  samples were  preserved in the
field with sulfuric acid (HgSO^.  Samples for BOD analysis  were
preserved by  icing before shipment.  Upon arrival at the PNWL, BOD
samples were  set up and Incubated at 20° C.

-------
                         WASTE  CHARACTERISTICS

      Wastes  from fish  production  are  from metabolic waste products
 and  residual  food.   The  metabolic products  consist mainly of ammonia-
 nitrogen  and  urea (5).   These  products  vary in amount  depending on
 water temperature, size  arrd  species of  fish, type and  amount of food
 consumed,  etc.
      Excess  food is  also a source of wastes.  Residual food sinks to
 raceway bottoms  where  the soluble portion leaches out.  The remain-
 der  of this  food ends  up in  the receiving water when raceways are
 periodically  flushed out.

                  Physi cal-Chemi cal Characteri sti cs
      Of primary  concern  were the  physical-chemical characteristics
 of hatchery effluents.   These  effluents include, for the most part,
 the  normal raceway discharges  and the backwash water from a hatchery
 employing  a water reconditioning/reuse system.  The parameters
 measured included temperature, dissolved oxygen, BOD, COD, nutrients,
 total  and  fecal  coliforms.
     Hatchery effluents were characterized by analysis of both grab
 and  composite samples.   For'the most part, grab samples were taken.
 One set of 24-hour composite samples were collected,  however,  so
 that diurnal  changes  could be noted.  To reduce the data  for
 comparisons among hatcheries, the waste units of lbs/100  Ibs
 fish/day were used.   Because of the  large flows  encountered  at the
hatcheries surveyed,  incremental  changes were small and in many  cases

-------
18
were lass than analytical accuracy.  For this reason wide variations
can be noted in the data.  An average of the data, however, reveals
answers comparable to the findings of other studies of a similar
nature.
     Figure 2 shows a daily record of temperature for five sampling
stations at the Eagle Creek Hatchery.  This record shows a rather
large  (6.5° C) diurnal change in temperature.  No significant change
in temperature is noted through the hatchery.
     Concurrently with temperature, dissolved oxygen was measured
every  two hours at Eagle Creek.  Figure 3 indicates results of these
analyses.  While no significant change is noted through the total
hatchery, a definite decrease is shown through the upper ponds.
Figure 4, which indicates only,the upper pond influent and effluent
DO's,  shows this most clearly.  Here, an average decrease of
0.6 mg/1 for the period surveyed can be noted.  The reason that a.
similar decrease was not measured through the lower pond is that the
lower  pond effluent passes through a holding basin (which contains
three  small aerators) and through the fish ladder before it is
discharged to Eagle Creek.
     Table 2 contains data collected at Eagle Creek and the Little
White Salmon Hatchery.  Averages for COD, SS, orthosphosphate, TKN,
and NH3-N in IDS per 100 Ibs of fish per day ran 2.0, 0.026, 0.015,
0.20 and 0.058, respectively.  No BOD samples were taken at Eagle
Creek or Little White Salmon, but the COD value of 2.0 lbs/100 Ibs
fish/day correlates well with the BOD value of 1.34 lbs/100 fish/day

-------
FIGURE 2.  Diurnal Temperature Curves for Five Stations at the Eagle Creek Hatchery.

-------
FIGURE 3.  Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Curves for Five Stations at the Eagle Creek Hathcery.

-------
FIGURE 4.  Diurnal Dissolved Oxygen Curves for Upper Pond Influent and Effluent at the Eagle Creek Hatchery.

-------
                                TABLE 2
WASTE LOADING FACTORS OF HATCHERIES SURVEYED WITH  RECONDITIONING/REUSE
#/100# Fish/Day
Hatchery
Eagle Creek!/
Eagle Creek!/
Little White Salmon
Little White Salmon
Eagle Creek
Eagle Creek
Eagle Creek
Eagle Creek
Little White Salmon
Little White Salmon

Locati on
Upper
Lower
Upper
Lower
Upper
Lower
Upper
Lower
Upper
Lower

Ponds
Ponds
Raceway
Raceway
Ponds
Ponds
Ponds
Ponds
Raceway
Raceway

Date
7/17/69
7/17/69
8/14/69
8/14/69
8/28/69
8/28/69
9/11/69
9/11/69
9/16/69
9/16/69

Pounds
Fish
4,000
6,500
1,337
1,337
7,700
12,700
14,600
14,400
1,581
1,581
Averages
Flow
mgd
7
8


7
8
7
7



.8
.4
.68
.68
.8
.4
.1
.7
.68
.68

Total
COD Phosphorus
3.2
6.5
—
—
.84
0
.82
.88
	
	
2.0
.037
.015
.069
.042
.076
.019
.016
.023
	
.027
.036
Orthophosphate TKN
.019
.006
.032
.003
.043
.011
.010
.015
.001
.005
.015
...
—
.21
—
.50
.22
.17
.13
.07
.07
.20
NH3-N
.080
	
.120
.050
	
	
.074
.040
.015
.025
.058
a/ 24-hour composite sample

-------
                                                                 23
reported by Kramer, Chin and Mayo (1) In a study of a Washington
trout hatchery.
     Bacteriological samples were taken during the 24-hour study at
Eagle Creek.  Samples were collected every four hours and analysed
for total and fecal coliforms.  Figure 5 shows total coliform counts
for the five sampling sites.  The data show that a source of con-
tamination existed above the hatchery during the first few hours of
sampling.  Comparison of values from above and below the hatchery
suggests that regrowth of coliforms may be occurring as a result of
the hatchery discharge.
     A large amount of the waste from hatcheries results from the
flushing of solids from the raceways.  Huber and Valentine (3)
measured 2.7 pounds of BOD and 8.9 pounds of total solids from the
flushing of one raceway which contained a seven-day accumulation of
solids.  They also showed that 93 percent of the solids could be
removed with 15 minutes of detention time.
     Hatcheries utilizing water reconditioning/reuse systems have two
primary sources of waste.  These are filter backwash water and the
raceway effluent, used as skimming water for the filters.  Skimming
water is discharged to allow for the addition of 5 to 10 percent
make-up water.   It is approximately equal in volume to the amount of
make-up water minus the amount of water used in the backwashing
process.

-------
                                                                i'pmiijmi'Miiiiiiii^
                                                                 :;-r: :r:: :-;1':-: ;':-,;;-: ±^i-^-lu^^i;^:i^;i^l-iiil : Tffl-iit.-i;
FIGURE 5.   Diurnal Total Colifonn Counts for Five  Stations at the  Eagle  Creek Hatchery.

-------
                                                                    25
      Backwash  wastes  were analysed at two of the  hatcheries  surveyed.
 The results  of the analyses  are  in Table  3.   The  wastes  from the  two
 hatcheries were very  similar with  respect to DO,  BOD,  COD, and
 nitrogen compounds.   The Salmon  Cultural  Laboratory waste had higher
 total  solids but was  lower in suspended solids  than the  Dworshak
 waste.   The  Salmon Cultural  Laboratory waste also had  a  high total
 coliform count (43,000/100 ml).  Both five-day  and ultimate  BOD
 values  for the two hatcheries  are  almost  identical.  For the Salmon
 Cultural  Laboratory and  the  Dworshak  Hatchery,  five-day  values were
 31  and  36 mg/1,  and ultimate  values were  160 and  150 mg/1, respec-
 tively.   Figure  6  shows  a plot of  BOD vs  time for each of the two
 backwash wastes.   While  the Salmon Cultural  Laboratory waste  showed
 a definite carbonaceous  and nitrogeneous  demand,  the waste from
 Dworshak did not.  This  disparity  may  have been caused by holding the
 Dworshak sample  in an iced condition  for  a longer period of time
 before incubation.
     To assess the removal efficiencies of settling,  and to obtain
 some design criteria, settling tests were run on the  filter backwash
water from the Dworshak Hatchery.  Each test consisted of filling
two 1,000 ml  graduated cylinders  with backwash water  and allowing
the solids to settle out.  One graduate was run 30 minutes  and the
other 60 minutes.  At these times the supernatent  was  siphoned off
for analysis.  The results of these analyses  were  compared with
those for the backwash water  which  are listed in Table  3.

-------
26
                                TABLE 3

                 WASTE CHARACTERISTICS OF OYSTER SHELL
                         FILTER BACKWASH WATER
                              Salmon Cultural        Dworshak National
                                Laboratory            Fish Hatchery
                                  5/22/69	12/17/69
 Temperature,   C                   16.0                    13.5
 Dissolved Oxygen,  mg/1              9.6                     8.8
 5  Day  BOD, mg/1                    31                      36
 Ultimate  BOD,  mg/1                155                     152
 COD, mg/1                          91                      81
 TOC, mg/1                           4                      16
 Total  Solids,  mg/1                314                     171
 Total  Volatile Solids,  mg/1       152
 Suspended Solids,  mg/1             10                      34
 Total  Phosphorus,  mg/1  as  P         4.4                     1.6
 Orthophosphate,  mg/1  as P           0.58                    0.38,
 NH3-N,  mg/1 as N                    .1                     0.13
 N02-N,  mg/1 as N                  <0.05                    0.033
 N03-N,  mg/1 as N                   3.6                     2.4
 TKN, mg/1  as N                     3.8                     4.7
 Total  Coliform,  per  100 ml     43,000
 Fecal  Coliform,  per  100 ml         <2

-------
                                 iifpi
                                 luuiiu
                                 11 i 1.1 U.U.
FIGURE 6.  Filter  Backwash Water BOD Curves.

-------
28
     Removal efficiencies for the 30 and 60 minute  tests,  as well
as the analysis for the 60 minute test, are shown in Table 4.   These
data show a significant reduction of SS, BOD,  TKN,  and TP  in the
first 30 minutes of settling, with little additional removal in the
next 30 minutes.  The close correlation between BOD, TKN,  TP and  the
SS removals indicates that BOD, TKN, and TP are associated with the
solids.  In contrast to TP, removals for the orthophosphates were
small.  This is because orthophosphates are usually in a soluble
form.

                              TABLE 4
        REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES OF SETTLING FOR BACKWASH WATER

Suspended Solids
5 Day BOD
Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen as
Total Phosphorus as P
Orthophosphate as P
% Remova
30 minutes 60
89
92
N 76
84
38
1
mi nutes
90
94
83
85
38
Final Effluent
cone. @ 60 min., mg/1
3
2
1.2
0.2
0.2
     Although most of the removals were accomplished in the first
30 minutes, it must be emphasized that these were static tests per-
formed under quiescent conditions.  Detention times approaching 60
minutes would be advisable for the design of a continuous flow-
through system.

-------
                                                                   29
                           Total  Waste  Load
     The estimated total  waste load per day produced  by  all  the
Federal and State hatcheries in the study area was  computed  by
employing average waste loading factors presented in  Table 2 and
in "reference 1.
         BOD5                      1.3  lbs/100 Ibs  fish/day  (1)
         TKN                       0.20 lbs/100 Ibs fish/day
         TP                        0.036 lbs/100 Ibs  fish/day
     Applying these factors to the 8.6  million pounds of fish
raised annually in the 114 Federal and  State hatcheries  in the  study
area, it has been calculated that approximately 23  tons  of BOD  are
discharged per day.  This discharge is  roughly equivalent to raw
sewage from a city of 270,000 people.  In addition, 8,600 pounds of
TKN and 1,500 pounds of TP are added daily to receiving  waters.
     The amount of pollutants discharged by each hatchery is not
extremely large; however, it becomes significant when the receiving
body of water is small.

-------
                        EFFECTS  ON  WATER QUALITY

                       Physical-Chemical  Effects
      To assess  the  effects  of hatchery  discharges on  receiving water
 quality, stream sampling was  undertaken at  the Eagle  Creek Hatchery
 and the Salmon  Cultural Laboratory.   Since  the Dworshak and Little
 White Salmon  Hatcheries discharge  their effluents into extremely
 large bodies  of water  it was  considered impractical to assess the
 effects  on water quality of these  hatcheries.
      Two sampling surveys were  made at  Eagle Creek and one at
 Abernathy Creek.  Grab samples  were taken above and below each
 hatchery as well  as a  few miles downstream.  The downstream samples
 were  to  check for persistence of pollution  and to assess stream
 recovery, if  any.
      Table 5  presents data  for  the two Eagle Creek surveys.  During
 each  of  these surveys, essentially the entire flow of Eagle Creek
 was utilized  by the hatchery.
      Data from the August 28 survey at Eagle Creek show an increase
 in temperature, total  solids, COD,  N02-N, N03-N,  TKN,  total  phos-
 phorus, and total coliforms, as well  as  a decrease in  DO as  a  result
 of the hatchery discharge.   About 100 yards  downstream from the
 hatchery the odor of ammonia was highly  noticeable.  At a  point  3.4
miles downstream the dissolved oxygen levels had  returned  to those
measured above the hatchery and the total solids  were  reduced.   The
nutrients, especially  nitrate nitrogen,  were still high.   The  great

-------
                          TABLE 5
HATCHERY DISCHARGE EFFECTS ON WATER QUALITY OF EAGLE CREEK

Temperature, °C
Total Solids, mg/1
DO, mg/1
COD, mg/1
N02-N, mg/1
N03-N, mg/1
NH3-N, mg/1
TKN, mg/1
Total Phosphorus, mg/1
Total Coli form /100 ml
Fecal Coli form /100 ml
Above
Hatchery Intake
13.0
109
10.4
4
<0.01
0.05
	
0.2
0.010
78
16
8/28/69
50 yds. Below
Hatchery
14.0
145
9.8
5
<0.01
0.07
	
0.5
0.048
90
4
3.4 mi. Below
Hatchery
14.8
108
10.0
3
<0.01
0.22
	
0.4
0.028
240
120
Above
Hatchery
15.0
53
10.0
<1
<0.01
0.08
0.06
0.2
0.011
124
4
9/1 1/69
50. yds. Below
Hatchery
15.8
72
9.0
4
<0.01
0.12
0.16
0.7
0.75
970
8
3.4 mi . Below
Hatchery
15.8
69
10.0
13
0.01
0.42
0.06
0.2
0.04
820
2

-------
                                                                   33
increase in nitrate nitrogen  resulted  from the  conversion  of ammonia
to this form.   Although  an increase in total  coliforms  was measured
at the downstream station, it is impossible to  determine with the
available data if this increase is  due to regrowth or a secondary
source.
     Data from the September 11 survey at Eagle Creek are  also pre-
sented in Table 5.  These data further substantiate the findings  of
the August 28 survey.  The ammonia  odor was again apparent below  the
hatchery.  As  in the August survey, there was an increase  in NOs  at
the 3.4 mile station, which correlates with the reduction  in ammonia.
     Table 6 contains the data obtained in the  survey of Abernathy
Creek, which receives the discharge from the Salmon Cultural Labora-
tory.  These data show about the same results as the Eagle Creek
data, except to a lesser degree.  This is because the hatchery dis-
charge constitutes only a portion of the total  streamflow.

                          Biological Effects
     A survey  was conducted at the  Eagle Creek  National Fish Hatchery
to assess the  effects of hatchery discharges on the biota  of a
receiving stream.  Four Surber samples were collected at each of
three stations.  These stations were selected on the basis of geo-
logic and hydraulic similarity.  Table 7 lists  the organisms found
at each of the three stations.  A description of the station location
and observations of the  benthos follows Table 7.

-------
34
                                TABLE  6

     HATCHERY  DISCHARGE EFFECTS ON WATER QUALITY  OF ABERNATHY  CREEK
                                5/22/69

Temperature, °C
Total Solids, mg/1
DO, mg/1
TO'C, mg/1
pH
N02-N, mg/1
N03-N, mg/1
TKN, mg/1
Total Phosphorus, mg/1
Total Coli form /I 00 ml
Fecal Coli form /100 ml
Above
Hatchery
13.8
24
10.7
<1
6.3
<0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
54
6
30 yds. Below
Hatchery
13.0
46
10.4
2
5.9
<0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
530
8
3 mi . Below
Hatchery
13.5
40
10.6
1
5.8
<1
<0.1
0.2
0.1
230
8

-------
          TABLE 7
EAGLE CREEK BIOLOGICAL DATA
Organisms
Stone flies (nymphs)
Perlodidae
Peril dae
Nemourida
Pel toper! idae
Mayflies (nymph)
Baeti dae
Ephemeridae
Heptageniidae
Leptophjebiidae
Caddisflies
Glassosomatidae

Hydropsychidae
Limnephilidae

Phyacophilidae

Hydroptilidae

Brachycentridae
Trueflies
Tendipediead

Mel ei dae
Rhagionidae
Similiidae

Ti puli dae

Tabanidae
Beetles
El mi dae
Psephenidae
Amphizoidae
Scuds
Gammeridae
Sow Bug
As el li dae
Mite
Crayfish
Astacidae
Snails
Physidae












Larvae
Pupae
Larvae
Larvae
Pupae
Larvae
Pupae
Larvae
Pupae
Larvae

Larvae
Pupae
Larvae
Larvae
Larvae
Pupae
Larvae
Pupae
Larvae

Larvae
Larvae
Adult









I

13'
7
2
5

23
21
16
7

7
2
19
3
3
11
6
8
1
3

11
6
2
1
2
1
5
1
5

4
1
2

4

1
14

1

0
Station
II

67
14
17
0

201
32
60
0

10
0
36
1
6
30
1
0
0
0

98
14
4
1
4
0
10
7
0

8
0
0

0

0
0

0

0
III

41
12
0
0

125
6
91
2

2
1
43
1
1
13
5
0
0
0

12
1
0
0
3
0
3
0
0

12
0
0

0

0
0

1

8

-------
  36
  Station 1
      This station was located several hundred yards upstream from
  the submerged weir control dam used for diversion of the hatchery
  water supply system.  Half of the stream bed at this location was
  boulders and bedrock the rest was packed gravel, small  rocks, and
  very coarse sand.  About half the boulders and gravels  were covered
 with diatoms.  Green algae growth at the station was very scarce.
      The benthic animal  community consisted of only modest numbers
 of many diversified kinds of fauna.   This  diversified community
 included mayflies,  stoneflies,  true  flies,  caddisflies,  beetles,
 mites,  isopods,  and crayfish.
 Station 2
     Station  2 was  located  about  150 yards  below  the  hatchery's
 lowest  outfall.   Here the stream  bed was mostly bedrock  and smooth
 boulders resulting  from annual scouring.  The water at this station
 was  slightly  milky  in appearance  and the air had an odor of ammonia
 and  dead fish.  The sand  in the eddies was covered by silt, fish
 feces, and fish food.  Dead salmon and trout fingerlings and lamprey
 carcasses were noted in most of the eddies and caught on some of the
 rocks.  The lamprey had died from natural causes.  From  their
appearance and location,  it was  concluded that some of the dead
salmon fingerling had been flushed from the hatchery ponds  and the
remainder had died in Eagle  Creek  below the Hatchery from unknown
causes.

-------
                                                                   37
     The majority of the rocks  and smooth  rubble  supported benthie
life.  Most of the aquatic Insects were strainer  types  such  as midges
and caddisflles which were present In greater than  modest numbers on
some of the smaller rocks.  In  general, the benthic community at
this station was less diverse than at Station 1,  but of greater
numbers.

Station 3
     Station 3 was located approximately 3.4 miles  below the hatchery.
Here the stream bottom was covered by boulders,  rubble, and  coarse
gravel.  The water was a light  brown, but was clear.  Lamprey
carcasses were particularly abundant, but no dead salmon or  trout
fry or fingerlings were observed.   All of the submerged boulders,
rubble and gravels were covered with diatoms.  Clumps of filamen-
tous green algae were observed.  These clumps of algae contained
mayflies, stoneflies, isopods,  amphypods,  mematods, and many kinds
of true fly larvae.  In addition,  crayfish, beetles, snails, and
caddisflies were found on and under the rubble and  coarse gravels.
Snails, mayflies and diatoms were particularly abundant at  this
station.

-------
                      TREATMENT METHODS  AND NEEDS

                       Water Reconditioning/Reuse
      During the past decade, much work  has been done in the  field of
 controlled  environment for fish propagation.  This approach  offers
 great promise  in maximizing production.
      Because different species  have  varying environmental require-
 ments,  flexibility  is  needed.   This  flexibility is most dependent
 upon  the water supply.   Burrows  and  Combs  (4) list five major cri-
 teria for a potential  water supply;  quality, quantity, temperature,
 disease incidence—low  or  absent, and location near the outlet for
 release.  Natural sites which meet all of  the above criteria are
 nonexistent.   Therefore, a solution  is needed to alter those factors
 which are not  suited for optimum production.
      One solution which has  proved successful is a water recondition-
 ing/reuse system using 5 to  10 percent make-up, developed by Burrows
 and Combs (4).  With this  reduced water requirement, problems of
 quality, temperature control and sterilization become economically
 feasible.   The major problem encountered in the development of a water
 reconditioning/reuse system was the gradual build-up of metabolic
waste which  became toxic to the fish.  The main metabolic  products  as
mentioned  earlier are urea and armonia (NH3).   Burrows  (5)  found  that
at stocking  rates of less than 5 pounds  of fish  per  gpm, urea was
the dominant excreatory product; at  higher rates ammonia became
dominant.   In addition, he found that whereas  urea exhibited  no

-------
40
deleterious effects, concentrations of un-ionized ammonia as  low  as
0.006 ppm in continuous exposure became toxic to fish.   To correct
this problem, a treatment system was devised consisting of a  biolo-
gical filter followed by aeration.  A schematic drawing of this
system is shown in Figure 7.  The heart of the system is the
biological filter which is shown in detail in Figure 8.  This filter
is composed of 4 feet of crushed rock overlain by 1  foot of oyster
shell.  The crushed rock provides a surface for the growth of
nitrifying bacteria which convert the toxic ammonia or ammonium ion
(NH^) to nitrate ions (NOp which are non-toxic.  In making this
conversion, 2 moles of oxygen are required to convert each ammonium
ion to a nitrate ion, as shown in the following equations:
                         Nitrosomonas
             NHj + 1.502 	*- 2H+ + H20 + N02
                        Nitrobacter
             N02 + .502 	"~NOs
The oyster shell which overlies the crushed rock serves many
functions.  It keeps the pH adjusted as the C02 produced by the fish
and the NO^ produced by the bacteria create an acidic condition.
In addition to stabilizing pH, the oyster shells trap the larger
solids and provide a large amount of trace minerals  required  by the
ni tri fyi ng bacteri a.
     Filter influent and effluent samples were taken at both  Dworshak
and the Salmon Cultural  Lab.  The analyses showed that ammonia
nitrogen is reduced and that nitrate nitrogen and nitrite nitrogen
are increased.  In addition, a decrease in suspended solids was noted

-------
                                                                                          41.
-   I
    2
     V]
        Ji
        5

                   *> V
               -fc§
             Aeration Tank
"1
                  Filter
                                   30-
                                       30"
                                    20" '

                                                    Header (Total Flow 150 to GOO GPM/Pound)
                                                                      j—Reu
                                                                                 Line
                                                                    •Waste from Ponds
                                                        75'x 17'Reel. Circul. Rearing Ponds
                                               PLAN
                                                                            Alternate Source
                                                                            of •*!»/*/•
                                                    20-75'x 16' Rect. Circul. Rearing Ponds
                                                                      '30* Drain Lines
                                                SECTION
 Aeration :
   Each Aspirator passes
   125 GPM at 10 psi
   11,400 GPM Requires 92
   Aspirators.
   Each Aspirator Requires
   4 so;, ft. of Area. 92 Aspi-
   rator 3€8 to., ft.  Aeration Tank
                                        Capacity:
                                          I.OOO,OOO Fish at lO/lo. or 4.OOO.OOO fish at SO/lb.
                                          or 5,400,000 Fish at 90/lb.
                                        Ponds:
                                          Twenty 75' Ponds at 600 GPM* 12,000 GPM in Circulating
                                          System.  I2,OOO at 5%-€OO GPM Supplemental Water ft'q'd.

                                        Filters:
                                          Each 1,500 sq.  ft. Filter Posses  1,500 GPM
                                          Eight Filters at I,50O GPM* 12,000 GPM.
             FIGURE  1.   Schematic  Drawing  of  a Typical  Controlled
                            Environment System for Rearing  Salmonlds (4).

-------
42
                        PLAN  VIEW  OF  FILTER
                                        Inlet S/w'ct Safe Operated
                                        by SoffOtd Operated Air Cjfl.
                                                                                     0.
                                                                                   ll
            Normal W. S. •
          ».S. When Washing-
            0/sler Shell
             Crushed Raft
             l/Z'to 3' Sir*
                                  1/4  to 3/4 Sin
                                   1/a'HcJet of 3"
                                   Ctrs. /" from
                                   Blm. 8 Stagger^
                                  L
Filtered Water Header. 1/Z Holtt /
at 4S* from 81m.
Total Number * 4,000 find. Cross-Header}
                                   9" Air Header
Filtered Water J
Suction Header^
                                                                                   Filtered Water
                                                                                   Pump
                     LONGITUDINAL  SECTION  THROUGH  FILTER
     FIGURE  8.   Design Drawing  of  a Water  Reclamation Filter  (4).

-------
                                                                   43
across the filter at Dworshak  (Table 8).

                               TABLE 8
                  OYSTER SHELL FILTER WASTE TREATMENT
Salmon Cultural Lab
5/22/69
Influent Effluent
Total Solids, mg/1
NH3-N, mg/1
N02-N, mg/1
N03-N, mg/1
pH
DO, mg/1
BOD, mg/1
COD, mg/1
198
0.11
0.05
3.5
6.2
7.3
2
6
198
0.02
0.05
3.7
7.0
6.7
<2
4
Dworshak Hatchery
12/17/69
Influent Effluent
227 171
0.08 0.05
0.03 0.05
2.2 2.4
-
-
-
-
     Following the filter, the water is aerated to replace the
dissolved oxygen used by the fish and the bacteria.  This aeration
also strips off any COg gas that is present.
     The accumulation of solids and growth of Sphaerotolus necessi-
tate backwashing the filter about once or twice a day under maximum
fish loading.  This backwash water and the skimming water constitutes
the effluent streams for a hatchery using a water reconditioning/reuse
system of this type.

-------
44
                       Other Treatment Methods
      Related studies on hatchery waste problems have led to schemes
which differ from those of the water reconditioning/reuse system out-
lined in the previous section.  Parker and Associates' studies of
the Rifle Falls Trout Hatchery in Colorado (2) led to the design of
a treatment system which includes high-rate trickling filters,
chemical additions, final sedimentation, and solids decomposition.
The filters were designed for 20 million gallons (MG) per acre per
day (.32 gpm/ft2) without recirculation.  Activated carbon and
potassium permanganate are added to remove taste and odor, followed
by a final settling basin with a 1 to 1% hr. design detention time.
Disposal of solids from the settling basin is accomplished in an
aerobic stabilization pond.
     At the Jordan River National Fish Hatchery in Michigan, a study
undertaken by the Lake Michigan Basin Office, FWQA, (formerly FWPCA)
(3) recommended a treatment system employing only a settling basin
or lagoon for the removal of solids.
     As stated earlier, a study by Huber and Valentine (6) at the
Lamar National  Fish Hatchery in Pennsylvania recommended a settling
basin with a detention time of 15 minutes for treatment of the
hatchery wastes and an activated sludge system employing only 2 hours
of aeration time.  Mechanical  aerators  are recommended for use in
the aeration basin, followed by a settling basin.

-------
                                                                   45
                           Design  Criteria
     The design criteria outlined  in  this section  are  for a  treat-
ment system incorporating an oyster-shell filter.   Although  other
systems may prove feasible, the oyster-shell  filter is presently
used-and was the only treatment process  analysed.   In  addition,
the system provides for the reuse  of  water  which offers many
advantages.  While doing an adequate  job of renovating water for re-
use, the system does present some  pollution problems through the
discharge of backwash and skimming water.   For this reason,  addi-
tional processes are needed in order  to  provide sufficient treatment
for discharges to receiving waters.
     An adequate treatment system for a  hatchery would consist of
three basic steps.  These are filtration-aeration, sedimentation,  and
solids handling.
     The filtration-aeration step is  explained in  detail in a
previous section.  Burrows and Combs  (4) outlined  the following
design criteria for the process:
     Filter
                                 p
          Loading rate:  1 gpm/ft
          Frequency of Backwash:  Every  other day  0 maximum loading
          Duration of Backwash:  40 min. air agitation, 20 min.
               of flushing
          Blower capacity:  1.33 scfm/ft2 filter

-------
46
     Aerators
          Number:  1 aspirator per 125 gpm @ 10 psi
          .Size:  4 ft^ of area per aspirator
     The filters should be sized to handle the full  hydraulic  load
of the hatchery.  This would prevent any solids from raceway flushing
entering the receiving water, besides providing the  best effluent
possible.
     The sedimentation step would be used for treatment of backwash
and skimming water from the filter.  The sedimentation system  could
be batch or continuous, depending on the size of the hatchery,
frequency of backwashing, space limitations, etc.  As determined by
the settling tests explained previously, a detention time of 30  to
60 minutes is needed for a continuous system.  Surface settling  rates
for this settling basin should be from 700 to 900 gallons per  day per
square foot.
     The disposal of solids from the sedimentation step is the third
phase of treatment.  This step can present the most  difficult
problems.  Many possibilities for treatment or disposal exist such as:
     Land disposal
     Insertion into domestic treatment system
     Aerobic or Anaerobic Digestion
     Concentration and Incineration
     Land disposal, either at the hatchery or some other place,  is a
relatively cheap and trouble-free method for disposing of solids.

-------
                                                                   47
Being high in nutrients,  these solids  might be  disposed  of by
spreading them on the hatchery grounds.
     If the hatchery is large enough to  warrant a domestic treatment
system, the solids could be disposed of  in this manner.   The solids
are highly amenable to treatment and no  problems should  be encoun-
tered with this method as long as the domestic  system is designed
hydraulically to handle the total flow.
     Another method of disposal is some  type of digestion system.
Parker (2) recommends an aerobic system; however, an anaerobic
system, such as a septic tank, could be  used.
     Incineration of solids, while effective, should be  used only
when other methods are not available.   It will  offer the most
problems in terms of operation and maintenance  as well as being
the most expensive to build.

-------
                         DEFINITION OF TERMS
     Algae -- Simple plants, many microscopic,  containing  chloro-
phyll.
     BOD ~ Biochemical  Oxygen Demand.  A measure of the amount of
oxygen required for the  biological decomposition of dissolved
organic solids to occur  under aerobic conditions and at a  standard-
ized incubation time and temperature.
     cfs -- Cubic feet per second.
     COD — Chemical Oxygen Demand.  A measure  in terms of the amount
of oxygen required to chemically oxidize all  organic compounds, with
a few exceptions, and some reduced inorganic  compounds.
     pp_ -- Dissolved Oxygen.
     mg/1 — Milligrams  per liter (1000 mg/1  =  1 gm/1).
     Orthophosphate -- A stable form of phosphorus which is the only
available form for biological activity.
     Phytoplankton — Plant microorganisms such as algae,  living
unattached in the water.
     Plankton -- Aquatic plant and animal organisms of small size,
mostly microscopic, that have relatively small  powers of locomotion
or drift in the water subject to wave action  and currents.
     SS^ — Suspended Solids.  Solids that float on the surface or  are
in suspension in water,  sewage or other liquids.
     TKN -- Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen.  Organic nitrogen and nitrogen
in the form of ammonia (NH3).  Does not include nitrogen in the form
of nitrates (NOa-) or nitrites (N02-).

-------
50
     TOC -- Total Organic Carbon.  Reported as carbon (C).
     TP_ -- Total Phosphorus.  Phosphorus in organic and inorganic
forms.  Phosphorus and nitrogen are nutrients necessary for main-
taining biological growth.
     TS_ -- Total Solids.  The sum of the suspended and dissolved
solids.

-------
                                                                51

                            BIBLIOGRAPHY
1.    Anonymous,  "A Study  of the  Pollutional Effects of Salmonid
          Hatcheries,"  Kramer, Chin & Mayo, Consulting Engineers,
          Seattle, Washington, June 1969.

2.    Anonymous,  "Preliminary  Report for Treatment Facilities, Rifle
          Falls  Trout Hatchery," Parker & Associates, Consulting
          Engineers,  Greeley, Colorado, August  1968.

3.    Anonymous,  "Water  Quality Conditions at  the Jordan River
          National Fish Hatchery, Elmira, Michigan, Department of
          the Interior, FWPCA, Lake Michigan  Basin Office, Great
          Lakes  Region, February 1969.

4.    Burrows, Roger E.  and Combs, Bobby D.  "Controlled Environments
          for Salmon  Propagation," The Progressive Fish-Culturist,
          Vol. 30, No.  3, July 1968.

5.    Burrows, Roger E.  Effects of Accumulated Excretory Products on
          Hatchery-Reared Sal mom' ds.  Department of the Interior,
          Fish and Wildlife Service,  Bureau of  Sport  Fisheries and
          Wildlife, Research  Report 66, 1964.

6.    Huber, Richard T.  and Valentine, Joseph  J. Analysis  and Treat-
          ment of Fish  Hatchery  Effluents.  Lamar National  Fish
          Hatchery Development Center, Lamar, Pennsylvania, 1968.

-------
     APPENDIX
Letter of Request

-------
                             UNITED STATES
                   DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                       FISH AND WILDLIFE .SERVICE
                      BUREAU OF COMMERCIAL FISHERIES
                      COLUMBIA FISHERIES PROGRAM OFFICE
                            811 N. E. OREGON STREET
                       P. O. BOX 4332, PORTLAND 8. OREGON 972O8
                                          December 2k,  1968
Mr. James L.  Agee, Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
501 Pittock Block
Portland, Oregon 97205

Dear Mr. Agee:

The wastes that are  discharged from some of the fish hatcheries that
are operated  with Federal funds on the lower Columbia Elver have be-
come nuisances during low flow in summer.

We believe that objectionable discharges should be corrected,  and
would like to obtain your advice on how this might be best accom-
plished.

Could we meet with you or appropriate members of your staff to dis-
cuss this problem?

                                      Sincerely yours,
                                      Fred Cleaver
                                      Program Director

-------
As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Depart-
ment of the Interior has basic responsibilities for water, fish,
ivildlije, mineral, land, park, and recreational  resources.
Indian and Territorial affairs are other major concerns  of
America's "Department of Natural Resources."
The Department works to assure the wisest choice  in manag-
ing all our resources so each will make its full contribution
to a  better United States—now and in the future.

-------