IMMEDIATE  POLLUTION   CONTROL   NEEDS
                           IN  ALASKA
                              APRIL  1967
                       U.S. Department  of the Interior
                Federal  Water  Pollution Control Administration
                              Northwest Region

-------
               ALASKA WATER LABORATORY

                   COLLEGE, ALASKA
          U.  S.  DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

   FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION

                  NORTHWEST REGION
                     A Report of


     IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS IN ALASKA



                     APRIL 1967
Additional copies of this report may be obtained from

               Alaska Water Laboratory
                   College, Alaska

-------
                         INDEX






Frontispiece. ..  .		   i




Index		  ii




Map of Alaska		 iii




Foreward		  iv






                     Area Reports




Anchorage Metropolitan Area	  	 1.1




Fairbanks Area	 2.1




Juneau-Douglas Area.........  	 	 3.1




Kenai-Soldotna Area		 4.1




Ketchilcan Area	5.1




Kodiak Area	6.1




Sitka Borough Area	 7.1






                    Special Problems




Alaska-Wide  Seafood  Processing Wastes	 8.1




Statewide Forest and Mining  Industry	9.1




Oil Industry	10.1




Remote Villages and  Federal  Installations	11.1
                                                         ii

-------
 PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
                                 FOREWARD


     The purpose of this report Is to summarize the immediate, knovm

pollution control needs of Alaska.  It is the first step in a com-

prehensive program to clarify the relationship of wastes disposal to

the economy and environment of Alaska.  The information presented has

been obtained from existing files and documents in addition to inter-

views with public officials and others with direct knowledge of

pollution conditions.  No new water quality surveys were carried out

for purposes of this report.  Much of the information contained,

although subjective in approach, represents first hand observations, or

the results of interviews with persons with first hand knowledge.

     Waste disposal has only recently begun to be generally recog-

nized in Alaska as an agent causing environmental change; therefore,

some potential problems may have been overlooked.  Many smaller

communities have had no pollution surveys whatever, although they are

listed for future planning by an information bulletin  released by the

State Department of Health and Welfare.  The present report will group

all such communities under a single heading for cost estimating.

     This report was prepared under authority of the Federal Water

Pollution Control Act, Section 3(a), as amended.
1.  State of Alaska Department of Health & Welfare, "Proposed
    Standards for Water Pollution Control in the State of Alaska",
    March 1967.
                                                                   iv

-------
              SUMMARY OF PROBLEMS AND COSTS THROUGHOUT ALASKA


A.  Municipal Waste Treatment

    1.  Primary and secondary treatment plant
        construction provisions for interceptors
        and connections, and extension of
        outfall lines	 $58,600,000

    Of this figure an estimated 25 percent is presently at the

    stage where some engineering planning exists.  No projects

    are knovm to be under active construction.


B.  Oil Pollution Control in Southwestern Alaska

    1.  Research of control measures	 $   200,000

    2.  Oil well drilling and crude handling...,	   7,000,000

    3.  Preventive measures	     400,000


C.  Fisheries Industry Waste Treatment

    1.  Waste Disposal	 $ 5,000,000

    2.  Waste Conversion to by-products

        a.  Research	     100,000

        b.  Plants and Equipment	   5,000,000


D.  Wood Products

    1.  Pulp Mill Effluent Treatment	 $ 4,000,000

    2.  Sawdust and Scrap Disposal	      50,000


E.  Mining and Gravel Washing Industries

    1.  Gold Placer Mining	 $   114,000

    2.  Gravel Washing	   2,000,000


                                 TOTAL	 $82,464,000

-------
Problem Areas and Immediate Needs




     It must be emphasized that much of the effort In pollution




control in Alaska, happily, will be in the category of preventive




measures.  Many large areas, where free of human activities, are




also free of pollution.  The Alaska State Water Quality Standards




as noxj being promulgated and the existing statutes require that




all waters be maintained in an unpolluted condition (with the possible




exceptions of waters used for gravel washing and placer mining).




     Waters of Alaska are today relatively free of pollution




problems when the immense extent of bay, inlet and river water area




is considered.  When one considers only those waters near which




there are industrial complexes or population centers,  the picture




changes.  The waters near population and industrial centers are




becoming polluted to a measurable extent and very little, if anything,




is being done to slow  the process.




     It  is  apparent that precisely  those practices which brought




pollution to dangerous levels  elsewhere, exist today  in Alaska.




These practices  include  (1) use  of  waters  as a dumping ground  for




all  types of refuse by individuals,  (2)  the widespread practices




of  direct dumping of  sewage with no treatment, and  (3) inadequate




attention by  industry  to  the  prevention of pollution.




     Pollution  of Alaskan waters is assured  if present trends  are




not reversed.
                                                             vi

-------
ANCHORAGE METROPOLITAN AREA
                                            1.1

-------
                                                                                                                                                                        ALASKA, MA?
                 0	1QO     800      80O     4OO	  30OKilf.Inrr.-t>i
S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. FEDERAL CENTER. DENVER. COLORADO  OR WASHINGTON  25. D. C.

-------
,/"'•*•  >
h'o
                                            i-o ,  -/'oun'j./i   ^     Si  "  *
                                               I  1            ><1ur' M

                                                             "1°>.'?>'
                                                                                                                    148°
                                                                                                    "".ANCHORAGE
 10
            20
                       30
                                Scale 1:1,000,000
                                  40         50
                                                        60
                                                                    70
                                                                               80
                                                                              sar:
                                                                                          90
                                                                                                     100 Statute Miles

-------
                      ANCHORAGE METROPOLITAN AREA

 I.  INTRODUCTION
      The purpose of this summary is to list and evaluate the sources
 and extent of pollution in the Anchorage metropolitan area of
 Alaska and to recommend actions designed to solve immediate problems.
      The recommendations presented herein are based on studies and
 recommendations documented in references (1),  (2) and (13) entitled
 respectively "Greater Anchorage Area Sewerage Study," "Eagle River -
 Chugiak Area Sewerage Study," both by a private consulting engineering
 firm,  and "The Pollution of the Waters of Knik Arms" by the Alaska
 Department of Health.  At the  present time the  Greater Anchorage
 Area  Borough,  an autonomous entity within whose political  boundaries
 the area under consideration  is contained,  has adopted the two former
 studies  as its master  sewerage  plan and is planning to present a
 referendum to its citizens  for  the authorization of bond sales.
      The present pollution  conditions  are in violation of  the
 Alaska Water  Pollution Control  Act and the Administrative  Code;
 the Department  of Health and Welfare  therefore requires that at
 least primary treatment  be  given to  the  sewage from the City of
 Anchorage,  Elmendorf Air Force  Base, and  Fort  Richardson.
      In  addition to the  State requirements, the  Presidential Executive
 Order 11288 requires federal installations  to  provide  secondary
 treatment  for  all wastes except cooling  waters  and fish hatchery
wastes,  or preferentially,  to discharge wastes  into municipal  sewer
 systems  providing adequate  treatment.
     Inasmuch as the recommendations presented in references (1)
 and (2)  comply with these requirements, implementation of these
recommendations is justified.  The Alaska Water Laboratory, however,
                                                                    1.4

-------

VICINITY

-------
feels that the Location of the proposed point of effluent discharge

warrants further evaluation of oceanographic data.

II.  SUMMARY OF MAJOR POLLUTION PROBLEMS, COSTS OF ABATEMENT, AND
     RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES

Responsible Agency   Immediate Treatment  Estimated Cost  Relative  Vicinity
and Nature of Waste         Needs          to Correct	  Priority  Map Index
City of Anchorage
and Anchorage sub-
urban area (domestic
wastes)
Ft. Richardson
U.S. Army
(domestic wastes)

Elmendorf Air Force
Base (domestic
wastes)

Two privately owned
canneries  (fish
cannery wastes)
Greater Anchorage
Area Borough
 (domestic wastes
 from Eagle River-
Chugiak area)

City of Anchorage
 (proposed snow-
melting plant wastes,
High chloride and
 silt loading
 expected)
 Ft.  Richardson and
 Elmendorf AFB
 (grease rack and
 wash rack wastes)
                    $ 26,500,000
Primary treatment
and disinfection
(to include Ft.
Richardson,
Elmendorf AFB,
and Anchorage
suburbs)

Primary treatment         *
and disinfection
Primary treatment
and disinfection
Separation of solids      *
at cannery and
disposal of liquids
to municipal sewer.
Solids to be dis-
posed of by owner of
cannery in accor-
dance with local
solid waste dis-
posal practices.

Secondary treatment    $ 650,000
and disinfection
(A)
                                       (A)
                                       (A)
                                        (A)
                                        (A)
No immediate treat-
ment needs, as
future design and
location of plant
should have abate-
ment provisions
built-in.

Grease traps and
sedimentation
tanks.
                     No separable
                        cost
(D)
NA
                         $  50,000
(B)
2,3
                                                                   1.6

-------
Responsible Agency    Immediate Treat-   Estimated Cost   Relative   Vicinity
and Nature of Waste      ment Needs        to Correct     Priority   Map Index

Privately owned         Sedimentation    $     100,000       (C)        5
gravel washing
plants (high silt
loading)

           Total estimated costs         $  27,300,000

* The estimated cost to correct is included in the cost for the
  combined sewerage system for the City of Anchorage and Anchorage
  area.  This cost includes interceptors and trunks but does not
  include laterals and house connections.

III.  IMMEDIATE CONTROL NEEDS

     The Anchorage metropolitan area, containing nearly half the total

population of Alaska, has relatively high water quality needs.  Anchorage

is  at the head of one of the largest migration routes  for anadromous  fish

in  Alaska.  Fisheries are the largest industry in Alaska, and  the continued

discharge of untreated pollutants into these waters can be expected to cause

the eventual depletion, both in quality and quantity of this valuable

resource.  The discharge of this untreated sewage also leads to deteriora-

tion of  the waters and shore areas immediately surrounding Anchorage,

creating potential health hazards and also leading  to  aesthetic and

nuisance problems.

     An  increase in the bacterial pollution of groundwater has caused

much concern, especially in those areas served by private shallow wells.

The continued practice of discharging sewage  into septic tanks and cess-

pools which  connect directly to groundwater aquifers can only  add  to  the

potential health hazard now and,  in  proportion,  increase as  the surface

area above the  aquifers is residentially  developed.


                                                                  1.7

-------
     In order to abate the existing pollution problem in the Anchorage




metropolitan area,  the following immediate steps are recommended,




in order of relative priority.




     A.  Construct a primary sewage treatment plant to treat all




domestic sewage originating from Elmendorf Air Force Base, Fort




Richardson, the City of Anchorage and its environs.




     B.  Construct interceptor and trunk sewers to transport sewage




to the recommended plant from the foregoing areas.




     C.  Construct a collection system and secondary treatment




plant for the Eagle River-Chugiak suburban area.




     D.  Install grease traps to separate oil and silt from wash




and grease rack wastes at Fort Richardson and Elmendorf Air Force




Base.  Fort Richardson presently is in the programming stage of




this project.




     E.  Install sedimentation facilities at gravel washing plants




which presently discharge silt laden waste water in Chester Creek.




IV.  RECENT PROCESS IN POLLUTION CONTROL




     The Greater Anchorage Area Borough recently adopted  a "Master




Sewerage Plan"  (1) and (2) which provides for the collection and




treatment of all domestic sewage in the metropolitan area, including




Fort Richardson and Elmendorf Air Force Base.  The Eagle  River-




Chugiak area is proposed to be served immediately by a trunk and




lateral system and a  secondary treatment facility discharging  to




Eagle River, for a total immediate cost of $641,000.




     It is proposed to serve  the balance of  the area by a primary




treatment plant and by an interceptor and trunk system estimated




to cost $26,000,000.  The primary treatment  plant effluent will




discharge  to Knik Arm via a submarine outfall.  The consultant's




                                                                   1.8

-------
recommendation to use only primary treatment for this portion of




the area was predicated on oceanographic studies which indicate




adequate dilution of the primary effluent.  Chlorination of the




effluent is also proposed.  The AWL feels that the point of dis-




charge requires further evaluation.




     This proposal will eliminate the discharge of all untreated




domestic and cannery sewage from the waters of Knik Arm and Eagle




River.  The proposed Eagle River facility will discharge chlorinated




secondary effluent to Eagle River.  The consultants compute that




dissolved oxygen will not be lowered below 6-8 rag/liter in the




Eagle River.




V.  BACKGROUND FOR RECOMMENDATIONS




     A.  Pertinent Basin Characteristics




         1.  Geography  (Also see maps on front piece)




             The Anchorage metropolitan area is located at the




head of Cook Inlet in southcentral Alaska.  For the purpose of  this




report it is defined as the lowland west of the Chugiak Mountains,




south of Eagle River and north of Rabbit Creek.  It is bounded  on




the northwest by Knik and Turnagain Arms.  The area defined covers




about 160 square miles.  It includes the City of Anchorage, several




suburban communities, and two military bases, Elmendorf Air Force




Base and Fort Richardson.  Anchorage is the largest city in Alaska




and the chief transportation center for this part of  the State.




         2.  Topography and Geology



             The Anchorage area is generally low lying, situated




on glacial alluvium, rubble and till.  Much of the terrain within




this region is typified by rather  flat  lowlands, undulating and




becoming progressively steeper near the base of the Chugiak Mountains.





                                                                   1.9

-------
The land surface in the Anchorage area slopes north and west from


the Chugiak Mountains to Knik and Turnagain Arms.  The altitude


ranges from 1200 feet on the mountain slope to sea level along the


estuaries.  The wide plain that extends from Eagle River west to


Point Woronzof and south to Rabbit Creek is the plain an which


Anchorage and its environs are located.  Tide flats border the shore


of Turnagain and Knik Arms and extend in to the mouths of most of


the streams which cross the lowland.


         3.  Climate


             The surrounding mountain barriers prevent the Anchorage


area from having the temperature extremes of the interior of Alaska


and the heavy precipitation of regions along the Gulf of Alaska.


The average annual rainfall, based on standard normals for the


period 1931-1960, is 14.71 inches.   In most years  the winter and


spring are relatively dry. About 48  percent of the mean annual


precipitation recorded at Anchorage  falls during the 3-month period


July-September.  The average seasonal snowfall is  about 5 feet.


             The spring and fall at  Anchorage are  characteristic-


ally short, the summer cool, and the winter moderately cold.


The average annual temperature based on  standard normals  for the


period 1931-1960 is  35.2° F.  The  lowest  temperature recorded was


-38°F. in February 1947 while the  highest was 86°  F. in June 1953.


Temperatures as high as 80° F. are uncommon.  The  average frost


free season is  112 days.  The ground usually begins  to  thaw  in


April or May and to  freeze  in October.   During  the winter the ground


commonly  freezes to  depths  of 6  to 8 feet  and deeper where  the  snow


has been  removed.  Cloudy days are common and contribute  to  the


 low rate  of evaporation which  ih turn  favors  the growth  of  forest


where  the  climate  is semiarid by middle-latitude standards.
                                                                1.10

-------
         4.  Population




             The present population of the Greater Anchorage Area




ia about 115,000,  excluding the Eagle Rivar-Chugiak area.   Forecast




growth for this area predicts a population of 260,000 persons by




1980.



             The Eagle River-Chugiak area presently has a populati. on




of 4,600 persons and growth patterns indicate a population of




7,100 persons by 1970 and 19,000 persons by 1980.




         5.  Industry




             There is very little industry in the Anchorage met-




ropolitan area.  With the possible exception of fish processing,




major forecast activity is in transportation and light industry,




which may be expected to have relatively low water use and waste




production rates.




     Present industrial type wastes consist of the following:




         Cooling water discharges from the power plants at Elmendorf




Air  Force Base, Fort Richardson, and  the Chugiak power plant at




Ship Creek.  It could be noted  that the cooling ponds of  the first




two  are presently used as  fish  hatcheries  for salmon and  trout.




The  effect of  increased temperatures  caused by blowdown from these




ponds may have  some bearing  on  fish population, but this  effect




has  not been fully evaluated.




         There  are two seafood  processing  plants discharging wastes




into Knik  Arm  on a seasonal  basis.




         There are several gravel washing  plants dumping  a  large




amount  of  silt into Chester  Creek on  a  seasonal basis.




         6.  Streams  and Rivers



             The streams in  the Anchorage  area are Ship Creek,




                                                                 1.11

-------
and Rabbit Creek, which arise in the mountains,  and Chester Creek,




which arises in the lowland.  All these streams flow to tidewater




and are tidal near their mouths.  The range of tidal fluctuation




in the estuaries is commonly 30 feet or more.  Within the lowland




plain are many depressions and flat areas that are marshy.  Shallow




lakes are common in these places, especially southeast of Anchorage.




             All the streams in the Anchorage area, except Eagle




River, are non-glacial.  The stream flows are provided by surface




runoff and groundwater seepage.  Where the streams emerge from  the




mountains onto lower ground, the stream beds are higher than  the




surrounding water table, and in such areas water is lost from the




streams.  However, when  the streams leave the mountains and cross




the lowlands to  the inlet,  the streams have incised their beds  to




relatively low elevations in respect to  the water  table and thus




are,  at the present time, receiving water from  the surrounding  areas.




Deep  well pumping in the Anchorage area  has no  effect on the  surface




water levels.  Draining  or  installing a  municipal  sewer system  which




would reduce the surface water input would lower the  surface  water




level and affect the surface water inflow to  the lowland streams.




             a.   Chester Creek




                  Chester Creek  is about  seven miles  long and  drains




a lowland surface area   of  about  twenty  square  miles.   It  flows




from  Muldoon Road to Knik Arm.   Chester  Creek derives most  of its




flow  from water  contributed from swamps,  springs and  drainage




ditches.  The water during  the  summer  is brown. The  average  yearly




discharge is about  24  cfs.   A high maximum  flow of 95  cfs  occurred




during  April 1965,  and the  lowest flow recorded was  4 cfs  during




March 1964.  The expected  temperatures would be in. the range  of




 32°  F.  to 65°  F.                                              1.12

-------
                 Chester Creek formally supported a small run of




coho and chum salmon and a run of Dolly Varden char.  Concurrent




with industrial and civic development,  Chester Creek has become




less productive of these fish species owing to disrupted flows and




spawning gravels.  The Alaska Department of Fish and Game has written




off Chester Creek as a producer of sport and commercial fishes.




It is, however, included in the proposed "Greenbelt" for the City




of Anchorage.




             b.  Ship Creek




                 Ship Creek flows approximately 22 miles from head-




water tributaries high in the Chugiak Mountains to the tidewater of




Knik Arm.  The drainage area of 113  square miles has provided maxi-




mum flows of 766 cfs during June 1964 and 2 cfs minimum flows during




March 1964.  These measurements were made at the Elmendorf power




plant location about 2 miles from the mouth of the  stream.  Consid-




erably larger  flows have been recorded at the City's municipal water




diversion dam  at 11.5 mile, and at periods during the winter  the




total Ship Creek flows at this point have been diverted.




                 The City of Anchorage, Fort Richardson, and  Elmendorf




use Ship Creek for domestic water supply.  A 40-foot dam for  diverting




domestic water is located approximately 11.5 miles  above its  mouth.




Below this domestic diversion, three steam power plants divert




water for turbine condenser cooling. A total of four diversion




dams  are installed within  the  first  eight miles.  Incremental flows




entering below the City's 40-foot dam maintain sufficient water to




operate these  cooling ponds.




                 Historically, Ship  Creek has a  record  of producing




a large run  of king and  pink  salmon.  Chum  salmon are present in




                                                                1.13

-------
small numbers.  Dolly Varden char and rainbow trout are present

but are not numerous in the system.   The stream is closed to salmon

fishing.  Fish passage facilities are provided at the diversion

dams, and salmon and trout can pass, when water conditions are favor-

able, to the base of the 40-foot dam at 11.5 mile.  Spawning gravels

are good, and it has been estimated that enough gravel is available

to meet the requirements of 21,000 king salmon.  During recent years

fewer than 100 king salmon have been observed in Ship Creek.  Pink

and chum salmon use the lower three miles of the creek.

                 Oil pollution in the stream has occurred several

times from Elmendorf Air Force Base.  The oil has been traced to

leaking storage tanks, and during 1962 an oil separator was installed

to prevent oil from entering the stream.  Coal dust from flue cleaning

at the power plant has been allowed to enter Ship Creek, but the

effects of this discharge have not been evaluated.

                 Water that is diverted from Ship Creek to the

power plants is circulated through cooling ponds.  The water from

these ponds is used for condensing steam in the turbine system.

Since the water gradually increases in temperature, water is added

from Ship Creek and then discharged from the pond back into Ship

Creek.  The result is a small increase in the temperature of the

stream.  During the winter the discharged water is warm enough to

prevent the formation of ice.  The Fort Richardson and Elmendorf

cooling ponds have been used for many years to rear rainbow trout.

The trout are supplied from the Alaska Department of Fish and Game,

Fire Lake Hatchery, introduced into the warm cooling pond water,

feed on prepared food and raised to stockable size.  The fish are

used to stock lakes and streams located on military reservations and  to

some extent other areas outside the jurisdiction of the military.
                                                                    1.14

-------
             -.  Campbell Creek



                 Campbell Creek is similar to Ship Creek in that it




has its origin in the Chugiak Mountains; however, the drainage area




of 30 square miles is much smaller.  The maximum flows recorded




occurred during June 1949 when nearly 900 cfs was recorded, and the




lowest was 0 during October of 1958.




                 Coho, king, and a few pink salmon enter the system




for spawning purposes.  Dolly Varden and stickleback are present in




the stream and reservoir.




                 An earth-fill dam was constructed across Campbell




Creek at tidex^ater in 1958 forming a reservoir of about 80 acres.




Access into the lake for fish has been provided by a culvert and




boulders which allow fish to pass during high tides.  No pollution




has been reported, although extensive housing developments have




been erected along its banks in recent years.  The lake and stream




are under study by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game  for  possi-




ble stocking and rehabilitation of  the  sports fishery.




             d.  Rabbit Creek




                 Rabbit Creek arises  in  the Chugiak Mountains  and




flows  from  a small lake located at  the  3,000-foot elevation to tide-




water  on Turnagain Arm, a distance  of about  10 miles.  No  stream




gaging has  been conducted on Rabbit Creek, and no temperature  infor-




mation is available.  Judging  from the  size  of the watershed,  Rabbit




Creek  is probably smaller  than Campbell  Creek.   It would be expected




to contain  little or  no  flow during the coldest  winter months  and




discharge up  to 400  cfs  during periods  of  high runoff.




                 Very little  information is  available regarding fish.




The Alaska  Department of Fish  and Game  is  studying  a small remnant  run




                                                               1.15

-------
of pink salmon.  A few cohos could be expected to enter the stream




also.  While no pollution has been reported to date, house construction




with attendant land clearing may be expected to provide some increase




in silt load, and increased human habitation could eventually pollute




this stream which at present is, except for the area near its mouth,




still in its natural state.




             e.  Eagle River




                 Eagle River flows from the base of Eagle Glacier




25 miles to Rnik Arm.  Several fairly large tributaries enter the




main water course along the way; many of these are glacial fed.




Eagle River is clear during the winter and turbid with glacial melt




during the rest of the year.  Owing to its glacial origin and partially




to its larger size, Eagle River is cooler than surface runoff streams.




The turbid water during the summer limits the growth of aquatic plants




and animals.  Tributary streams and side channels of the main river




provide suitable spawning and rearing areas for anadromous fish.




                 Eagle River supports all five species of Pacific




salmon.  Besides king, coho, pink, and chum, sockeye have been found




to spawn here in significant numbers.  Dolly Varden char are also




present.  There are no reports of rainbow trout in the drainage.




                 Fort Richardson discharges untreated sewage through




a 30-inch outfall into a small tributary of Eagle River.  The outfall




is located in the souttwest corner of T. 14 N., R. 2 W., about 3




miles northeast of Otter Lake.




                 The Eagle River valley above the highway bridge has




been set aside for a power and domestic water source by the City of




Anchorage.  The site is under preliminary permit No. 2405 by the




Federal Power Commission.




                                                            1.16

-------
                 Homesteading above the reservoir withdrawal area


has gradually taken up all the available land on the north side of


Eagle River.  A good all-weather road connects most of these lands


to the Glen Highway at the town of Eagle River.  Housing developments


are gradually replacing the homesteads and can be expected to


provide a source of future pollution as the trend toward urban


sprawl encroaches upon the Eagle River area.


         7.  Vegetation


         Plant cover follows three distinct types.  In well-drained


areas the forest consists of white spruce, cottonwood, aspen, birch


willow,  and alder.  Along the tidal flats and at the mouths of


streams, the vegetation is particularly sparce owing to the frequent


tidal flooding.  Only salt-tolerant plants are found.  In the poorly-


drained land above tidal influence the ground cover is predominantly


moss, sedge, grass, and other marsh plants.  Black spruce, birch


and alder grow in a few marshy places.  Peat has formed in most of


the bogs.


     B.  Present Water Quality


         1.  Domestic Pollution Sources


             At the present time domestic sewage from the following


areas is being discharged untreated directly or indirectly into


the water of Cook Inlet through the following  sewers and numerous


other small outfalls:

                                      Population    Average Flow  (MGD)


             a.  City of Anchorage      21,700          3.11


             b.  Spenard area           13,500          1.85


             c.  Elmendorf              16,100          1.28


             d.  Ship Creek               3,450          1.14  (much

                                                           infiltration)
             e.  Fort Richardson        12,700         1.11

                   (Eagle River)
                                                                    J. • JL /

-------
                                      Population     Average Flow (MGD)

f.  Governement Hill                     3,700           .26

g.  Turnagain Heights sewer             small

h.  International Airport sewer         small

         2.  In addition to the direct discharge into Cook Inlet

of domestic wastes,  many suburban areas of metropolitan Anchorage

utilize separate home septic tanks or cesspools which discharge

into the ground.  As the population of the metropolitan area is

presently estimated at about 115,000 persons, this signifies that

the sewage contributed by about 45,000 persons is disposed of in

this manner.

             Except for Fort Richardson, all of the raw domestic

sewage is discharged into Knik Arm.  Although the dilution available

is theoretically infinite in this body of water, there is evidence

of local pollution by the existence of unsightly and odorous solids

on the shores.  Some of the outfalls are accessible to children

playing on the shore, thereby presenting a health hazard.

             Fort Richardson discharges its  sewage to the ground

surface from whence it meanders about one mile across marshland to

Eagle River and thence into Knik Arm.  This  practice makes direct

contact accessible to animals or persons who may be in the area.

Upon reaching the Eagle River, a dilution factor of 1.7 to 1 is

available based on minimum winter flows of 4.8 cfs in the Eagle

River and maximum discharge of sewage of 1,82 MGD from Fort Richard-

son.  Although this is an exceptionally low  dilution factor, the

effect on the Eagle River may be alleviated  by  the one-mile overland

travel of the raw discharge, which would be  conducive to removal

of solids and re-aeration of the effluent before merging with

the Eagle River.
                                                                 1.18

-------
             The discharge of individual home septic tank effluent

or cesspool effluent is conducive to pollution of ground water

sources.  This is evidenced by the increasing frequency of bacterio-

logically polluted wells in the area, as determined by Alaska

Department of Health tests,

VII.  BIBLIOGRAPHY

     1.  Greater Anchorage Area Sewerage Study for the Greater
Anchorage Area Borough.  Prepared by Tryck, Nyman & Hayes and
Stevens & Thompson  (1966).

     2.  Eagle River-Chugiak Area Sewerage Study for the Greater
Anchorage Area Borough.  Prepated by Tryck, Nyman & Hayes and
Stevens & Thompson  (1966).

     3.  USGS Bulletin 1095, "Surficial Geology of Anchorage and
Vicinity, Alaska."

     4.  USGS Paper 1372, "Compilation of Records of Quantity*and  •
Quality of Surface Waters of Alaska Through September 1950."

     5.  USGS Paper 1740, "Compilation of Records of Surface Waters
of Alaska, October  1950 to September 1960."

     6.  USGS Paper 1773, "Geology and Ground Water Resources of the
Anchorage Area, Alaska."

     7.  USGS Paper 1953, "Quality of Surface Waters of Alaska,
1961-1963."

     8.  USGS Publication, "Water Resources Data for Alaska  Eort,
Surface Water Records 1965."

     9.  USGS Publication, "Water Quality Records in Alaska, 1964."

    10.  USC&GS Publication, "Tidal  Current Tables 1967 Pacific
Coast of North America and Asia."

    11.  USC&GS Publication, "Tide Tables High and Low Water Pre-
dictions 1967, West Coast North and  South America including the
Hawaian Islands."

    12.  U.S. Dept. HEW, USPHS Report, "Water Well Contamination and
Waste Disposal in  the Greater Anchorage Area."

    13.  State of  Alaska Department  of Health and Welfare Report,
"The Pollution of  the Waters of Knik Arm" January 1964.

    14.  State of  Alaska Department  of Health and Welfare Report,
"Greater Anchorage Water Pollution Survey,  1963."

                                                                  1.19

-------
FAIRBANKS AREA
                                     2.1

-------
                                                                                                                                                                ALA;--;:
                                                                                                                                                     ALASKA. MAP C
                   100     aoo    300     409    SnoKil'.lm-T.-ts
EOLOSICAL SURVEY. FEDERAL CENTER. DENVER. COLORADO  OR WASHINGTON IS, 0. C.

-------
                           FAIRBANKS AREA






I.  INTRODUCTION




     The purpose of this summary is to list and evaluate the sources




and extent of pollution in the Fairbanks area of Alaska and to



recommend actions designed to solve immediate needs.




     Although the City of Fairbanks, University of Alaska, Fort



Wainwright, and Eielson Air Force Base provide treatment for their




sewage, the balance of the area disposes of its wastes either direct-



ly to  the Chena River, the Tanana River or through cesspools and septic



tanks  directly into the ground.  The discharge of untreated sewage




into ground water aquifers or to surface streams is in violation of




the Alaskan Water Pollution Control Act and the State of Alaska



Administrative Code;  the Department of Health and Welfare requires



that at least primary treatment be given to all sewage before dis-



charge to the waterways.




     In addition to the state requirements, the Presidential Executive



Order  11288 requires  federal installations to provide secondary treat-



ment for all wastes.  A preferred method is to discharge  to a




municipal system with adequate treatment.



     A detailed study was not made  in the preparation of  this summary.



It was presumed that  a complete engineering design  analysis will



preclude physical implementation of the recommendations presented



herein.
                                                                  2.3

-------
                                                T
              >•••  taiKHXXKs''  '"'I   "
                           '   /c
                                               t1i rid in
                                                M n 4
                                                       -N, ,,r±l
 B  C
M K  I N G
                             A',,
                             Clecir Crr' k
                             •Buttc
- A N  1)
                                                                          •\
G  U  N  N
\/er
1   : k
               \0
                                 I!. A X G E i
                                                                                                 K Bluff
                                                                                               Bluff  ,' ;
                                                                                         M« *  IV  '\  ,  1
                                                                                         '      [   \N
                                                                                                     \
                                                                                                    A
                                                                                                     A:
                                                                     E  I? Y
                                                                               ,:   FAIRBANKS,  AL
                                                 SCALE 1:250,000
                                                       !0

-------
II.  SUMMARY OF MAJOR POLLUTION PROBLEMS, COSTS OF ABATEMENT, AND
     RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES.
Responsible Agency    Immediate Treatment   Estimated Cost Relative Vicinity
and Nature of Waste   	Needs	     to Correct   Priority Map Index
                                             $12,000,000
                                             (for imple-
                                             mentation)
Fairbanks North     Assumption of health      $150,000
Star Borough        powers by Fairbanks      (for an engi-
(Domestic Wastes)   North Star Borough and   neering design
                    immediate initiation     analysis)
                    of an engineering sewer
                    study, followed by
                    implementation.  Fort
                    Wainwright should be
                    included in such a
                    study.  The Borough
                    presently has a com-
                    prehensive plan in
                    the process of pre-
                    paration, but this plan
                    is not expected to
                    include sufficient
                    detail to provide the
                    basis of satisfying
                    immediate needs.

Fort Waim/right     Supplement the exist-     $2,000,000
(Domestic Wastes)   ing primary system with
                    secondary treatment and
                    disinfection.
                                                             (A+)
(A)
                                                              (C)
Eielson Air Force   Supplement  the exist-
Base                ing primary system with
 (Domestic Wastes)   secondary treatment and
                    disinfection.
                                                $100,000
(B)
 III.   IMMEDIATE CONTROL NEEDS

     The Fairbanks  area is characterized by  a haphazard  arrangement of  sub-

 divisions  surrounding  the City  of Fairbanks.  Except  for the City  itself,  the

 University campus,  Fort Wainwright  and Eielson Air Force Base,  all other areas

 of  the Fairbanks North Star  Borough,  including those  areas  immediately  outside

 the city limits, dispose of  their sewage into septic  tanks, cesspools or by

 direct discharge into  the nearest slough or  stream.   Since  all  water  supplies

 in  this area originate in ground water aquifers,  the  effect on  potable  water

 quality has been very  noticeable.   Over 50%  of all non-public water supplies

 show evidence of sewage pollution.   This condition has  caused much concern by

 health authorities, especially  for  those areas served by private shallow wells.

                                                                        2.5

-------
The areas bordering on the Fairbanks city limits could solve their




problem by petitioning for annexation to the City and connecting to the




municipal sewer system.  They could also petition the Fairbanks North




Star Borough, a recently constituted autonomous governmental entity, to




develop a service district for the purpose of providing sewer service




to a specific area.  A preferable solution, however, would be for the




Fairbanks North Star Borough to assume the responsibility of providing




sewers by referendum and to provide sewer service to citizens on an




area-wide basis.




     In order to abate the existing pollution problem in the Fairbanks




area, the following immediate steps are recommended in order of




relative priority.




     A.  The Fairbanks North Star Borough should immediately assume




sewer powers followed by the authorization of an engineering sewer




study followed by  implementation of the study.  Fort Wainwright,




because of its proximity to the City of Fairbanks and to the proposed




sewered area,should also be included in this study.  The probability is




that participation in an area-wide  sewer plan would be more economical




than providing separate treatment.  On this basis it may be desirable




to hold any  action on  the  proposed  Fort Wainwright  sewage  treatment




facility until such  time as a detailed engineering  analysis deter-




mines whether  this would result  in  the least cost to  the taxpayer.




     B.  Construct a  secondary treatment  facility to  supplement  the




existing primary  facility  at  Eielson Air Force  Base for  the purpose




of  improving the  quality of primary effluent which  is presently  being




discharged  to  Garrison Slough.
                                                                  2.6

-------
IV.  RECENT PROGRESS IN POLLUTION CONTROL




     There has been a relatively large amount of information gathered




in the Fairbanks area concerning pollution.  The State Department of




Health and Welfare has made several bacteriological and chemical sur-




veys of the Chena River and other streams in the local area,  and the




state sanitarian is at present monitoring the quality of potable water




supplies from a bacteriological and detergent standpoint.  The Alaska




Water Laboratory is also monitoring the quality of the Chena River as




well as other streams in the immediate area and performing chemical




and bacteriological tests.  The Fairbanks North Star Borough is in the




process of compiling a comprehensive study of the Fairbanks North Star




Rural Area, a portion of which will be devoted to a water and sewer




study.  The Corps of Engineers is completing the second phase of a




report of the Fairbanks flood control project.  This-project envisions




a dam and reservoir in the Chena River upstream from the Fairbanks




area.  The pollution load in the Chena River will be definitely




affected by the control of discharge from this proposed reservoir.




The DOD plans to program construction projects to abate pollution in




the near future.  Their plan for controlling environmental pollution




has been approved by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.




V.  BACKGROUND FOR RECOMMENDATION




     A.  Pertinent Characteristics



         1.  Geography




             The City of Fairbanks and its environs is located in the




valley of  the Chena River near river mile 10 and the Tanana River near




river mile 210.  This valley lies in the central plateau region approxi-




mately 250 air miles northeast of Anchorage and 130 miles south of the





                                                                    2.7

-------
Arctic Circle.  Although its elevation is only about 400 feet above
mean sea level, it is well sheltered from maritime  influences by
mountain ranges on practically all sides.
         2.  Climate
             The climate of the basin in which Fairbanks lies is con-
tinental in nature and is characterized by cold dry winters and warm,
relatively moist summers.  The total precipitation is low,  averaging
about 12 inches.  Annual snowfall is about 60 inches.
     The temperatures over the basin are characterized by their great
seasonal variation. Subzero temperatures prevail in the winter months
while summer temperatures are as warm as portions of western and
northern United States.  At Fairbanks the all-time minimum temperature
is minus 66°F, and the highest temperature on record is a plus 93°F.
         3.  Vegetation
             The vegetation within the basin consists of heavily
forested mountains changing to muskeg and scrub  in the lowlands.  The
low areas are  typified by willows, sedges, black spruce, potholes, and
 hummocky  tundra  scattered over permafrost, while the better drained
lands support  stands of white spruce, poplar, and birch.
         4.  Population
             The present population of the Fairbanks-Fort Wainwright-
College-Lemeta complex is approximately 40,000 persons.  Expansion of
the population since 1960 shows a continuation of the "boom" quality.
Indications are that this expansion will continue for some time.
         5.  Economy
             The City's  central location gives it an advantage over
other Alaskan  cities in  functioning as the trade and distribution center
of the vast interior.  Trade is the important ingredient in  the  economy
                                                                   2.8

-------
of Fairbanks.  Without it the city cannot prosper.  Because of the

distances involved, transportation costs are high and labor is an

expensive commodity in Fairbanks.  Also due to its relative isolation,

climatic conditions, high transportation, and development costs, the

potentials of the interior, mining, agriculture, and forestry have been

slow to materialize.  As a result of these factors, the economic well-
                                                        t
being of Fairbanks continues to be dependent upon construction

associated with military programs, service and retail functions,

government,  and transportation.

         6.  Rivers

             The important streams in the Fairbanks area are the Chena

and Xanana Rivers.

             a.  Chena River

                 The Chena River originates in a mountainous region

about 90 air miles east of Fairbanks and discharges into the Tanana

River below  Fairbanks.  It is  an unregulated river approximately 150

miles long with a watershed of about 1980 square miles.  The average

annual discharge at Fairbanks  is 1344 cfs with a  range of  100-24,200

cfs.  Maximum discharge is reached in April and May with normal flows

occurring  in the summer and extreme  low flows occurring during  the

winter season.  Water  temperatures range  from near 32° F.  in  the

winter to  about 60° F. in  July.  Ice begins to  form  in October  and

spring breakup occurs  in April and May.

             b.  Tanana River

                 The  Tanana River  originates  in  the  glaciers  of the

Wrangell Mountains  in Yukon  Territory,  Canada,  approximately  250  air

miles  southeast of Fairbanks.   It  flows in  a  northwesterly direction  to

empty  into the Yukon  River at  Tanana approximately 125  air miles  west

                                                                 2.9

-------
of Fairbanks.  It is approximately 600 miles long, unregulated but




greatly affected by glaciers.  The average discharge near Fairbanks in




1965 was 22,010 cfs while the maximum recorded discharge is 117,000 cfs.




Maximum flows occur in the spring and minimums occur during the late




winter.  Temperatures range from near 32° F. to a maximum of 55° F.




Ice begins to appear in late September, and breakup occurs in April




and May.




     Both rivers support substantial salmon runs and also contain an




endemic population of sport fish such as grayling, pike, ling cod and




whitefish.




     B.  Present Water Quality Problems




         At the present time, Eielson Air Force Base discharges approxi-




mately 80,000 GPD of primary effluent to Garrison Slough, which flows




into the Tanana River.  The State Department of Health has been con-




cerned about the evidences of pollution in this waterway.  The construc-




tion of secondary treatment facilities to supplement the existing primary




sexjage treatment plant at Eielson should alleviate this condition.




Fort Wainwright presently discharges approximately 600,000 GPD of primary




effluent into the Chena River upstream from Fairbanks.  The Fairbanks




municipal primary sewage treatment plant discharges the sewage contri-




buted by about 17,000 persons into the Chena River.  Further downstream,




a secondary treatment plant managed by a private utility company dis-




charges secondary effluent into the Chena River, contributed by the




University of Alaska with a population of approximately 2,000 persons.




The balance of the population of the Fairbanks North Star Borough, con-




sisting of approximately 15,000 persons, discharges raw sewage directly




into the Chena, or to numerous sloughs connecting to it, or to septic




tanks or cesspools with insufficient horizontal clearances.




                                                              2.10

-------
The groundwater table is high in the Fairbanks area,  and in most places
is within several feet of the surface.   The State Department of Health
and Welfare is continually performing detergent and bacteriological
analyses of water supplies in the Fairbanks area.  The following re-
sults from sampling in various subdivisions surrounding the City of
Fairbanks are given to illustrate the seriousness of groundwater
pollution.  Detergent analysis results taken from December 1, 1963
through March 10, 1964 are:  Hamilton Acres 70% positive; Aurora Sub-
division 50% positive; McKinley Acres 75% positive; College area 75%
positive.  The average value of all the samples taken indicates that
61% were positive.  As could be expected, the waters of the Chena River
show high coliform counts and significant levels of BOD.  However,
because of cold water temperatures and the short distance from  the
outfalls to the Tanana River, where an exceptionally high dilution
factor  is available, there is no noticeable oxygen sag curve  in the
Chena River.
     Due  to the  recent  construction of a mine-mouth power plant at
Healy,  the anticipated  shutdown of  the local  Golden Valley  Electric
Association power plant  has  caused  a great deal  of concern  in the  com-
munities  bordering Noyes Slough, a    tributary  of the Chena River.
With  the  cessation of  the discharge of cooling water  into Noyes Slough,
numerous  private outfalls presently discharging  into  it  will have  no
dilution whatever.
      The population  density  of  the  presently unsewered  Fairbanks  environs
has increased to the extent  that it would be economically feasible to
 provide sewers for the majority of  these areas.   It  is  almost mandatory
 to provide such service considering the amount of polluted groundwater
 which presently supplies the numerous individual shallow wells.
                                                                  2.11

-------
VII.  BIBLIOGRAPHY

     1.  Report Number 8, Chena River Survey, Fairbanks, Alaska - 1955,
         Alaska Water Pollution Control Board.

     2.  Surface Water Records of Alaska, 19S4, U.S.  Department of the
         Interior, Geological Survey.

     3.  Letter Report, Fairbanks Flood Control Project Alaska, prepared
         by U.S. Army Engineer District, Alaska, 1962, revised 1954.

     4.  Fairbanks Public Utility Plans, 1951, by the city planning
         office.

     5.  Fairbanks Neighborhood Analysis, 1961, city planning office.

     6.  Fairbanks Alaska Comprehensive Plan, October 1959, prepared
         for the City of Fairbanks by the Alaska Housing Authority.
                                                               2.12

-------
JUNEAU-DOtJGlAS AREA
                                          3.1

-------

                                                                                                                                                  AUASKA..MA? ;
            Q	iqo    aoo   	aog	4<>O    sooKilnMi.-t.-t.
EOLOGICAL SURVEY. FEDLRAL CENTER. DENVER. COLORADO  OR WASHINGTON  25. D. C.

-------
                                                             Thi.- Snow
                                                             TowetT.,
                                                                        ' *^A
                                                                       ^',     .   Emperor F'ea!^  s\
                                                                                                  -y
                                                                                                                    O
                                                                             -      Princt
                                                                             >    .- Peak
                                                                                                      -MP
                                                                                                           SI tnting
                                                                                                              ik
                                                                                                    m
                                                                                                  M'n
                                                 I \r c  nnis
                                                 ntr
                                                                 E> It irr)
                                                                 t Un
                             Hai-i-i

                              'Auk
                              Mtn
                                                                                  Death

                                                                                  Valley
           AM/' f <<
           '•'' " Nugget Mtn

                       Split
                                                                              C,la i'i      ;
                                                                                     Cairn
                                                                             , , R ' ' J'k   O1
                                                                             ' -''    \   P
                                                                                                 O! )
                                                                                                              V,
o-
     Mtn
                            4" *Coit
                               Island
                               Hor-f
                               lslar,d
'*
                                       Scull  •
                                      I' land  ''   /„
                                                          Pt 10 1
                                                                                                  C I irk Pt-

                                                                                                ' Sh.  p Mtn
                                                                                                     t Pt
                                  ""M ut i on I

                                  	JiOltOllGfl
                                                            SCALF. 1.250000
                                                                                A  M  D  ;          ^   '-

                                                                                :/..,    \\.  ...  iJUNEAU.  A1
                                                                              10

-------
                         JUNEAU - DOUGLAS AREA


I.  INTRODUCTION

     The purpose of this summary is to examine and evaluate the

sources and extent of pollution in the Juneau-Douglas Area and to

recommend actions designed to satisfy immediate needs.

     The Cities of Juneau and Douglas presently discharge their

raw sewage to Gastineau Channel through numerous outfalls.  Except

for three small package treatment plants in the Mendenhall Glacier

Area, all other raw sewage from this area is discharged to the ground

via septic tanks or cesspools, or to local bodies of water.

     These practices are inconsistant with the Alaska tfater Pollution

Control Act and the State Administrative Code,  The State Department

of Health requires that a minimum of primary treatment be given to

sewage discharged to surface waters.

     In addition to State requirements, Presidential Executive Order

11283 requires Federal Installations to provide secondary treatment

for all wastes, except cooling water and fish hatchery wastes, or

preferentially, to discharge wastes into a municipal sewer system

providing adequate treatment.

     No detailed study was made in the preparation of this summary.

A complete engineering design analysis will be required prior to

physical implementation of the recommendations presented herein.

II.  SUMMARY OF MAJOR POLLUTION PROBLEMS, COSTS OF ABATEMENT, AND
     RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES

Responsible agency   Immediate treat-  Estimated cost  Relative  Vicinity
and nature ofjwaste     ment needs	    to correct    Priority  Map Index

City of Juneau       Primary treat-     $400,000           (A)        1
(domestic wastes)    ment and disin-    (improvements
                     fection            to existing
                                        system only)
                                                                    3.4

-------
Responsible agency   Immediate treat-  Estimated cost  Relative  Vicinity
and nature of waste     ment needs     	to correct    Priority  Map Index

City of Douglas
(domestic wastes)
   ment needs

Primary treat-
ment and disin-
fection
  $500,000
(improvements
to existing
system only)
(A)
                                       $2,600,000
                                       (interceptors
Primary treat-
ment plant for
cities of Juneau  and plant only)
and Douglas
                  $3,500,000
                  (total cost of
                  combined improve-
                  ments)
                   (A)
Greater Juneau
Borough, Menden-
hall Glacier
Valley Area
(domestic wastes)

One privately
owned seafood
processing
plant.   (Seafood
wastes)
Primary treat-
ment and disin-
fection
$1,500,000
(A)
Separation of     Capital cost
solids at plant,  included  in
Disposal of       municipal  system
liquids to Muni-  costs  above.
cipal Sewer.  Dis-
pose of solids  by
solid waste dis-
posal methods.
                   (B)
 Small  Boat  Harbor
 (domestic wastes)
 Primary treat-
 ment  and disin-
 fection (connect
 to municipal  system)
     $50,000
 (B)
 III.   IMMEDIATE CONTROL NEEDS

      The Juneau-Douglas Area economy is based mainly on government disburse-

 ments, with about 50 percent of the civilian workforce employed by the

 federal, state or local government.  Tourism and seafood processing also

 contribute to the economy.   There is recreational use of the waters of

 Gastineau Channel, Auke Lake and the clearwater streams associated with

 these systems.  Recreational boating and fishing are very popular.  For

 the most part, municipal and private water supplies are free from pollution;

 however, potable xrater supplies in the Mendenhall Glacier Valley Area

 originate in ground water aquifers and are subject to contamination from

 sewage discharged from cesspools and septic  tanks.
                                                                    J. j

-------
                                          '   •
^\\Li.LLl,J.  JUNEAU AND VICINITY, ALASKA L,


                   I
fiShO ;
                            SCALE 1:24000
                                 o
1 MILE

-------
     The continued discharge of untreated pollutants into the

surface waters and aquifers of the Juneau-Douglas Area can be

expected to increase the hazard of using ground water supplies.

Untreated sewage can also be expected to lead to the continued

deterioration of the surface waters and shore areas, by creating

potential health hazards, and aesthetic and nuisance problems.

     In order to abate the existing pollution conditions in the

Juneau-Douglas Area the following immediate steps are recommended,

in order of relative priority.

     A.  Construct a primary treatment plant(s)  and interceptor

sewers, so that municipal sewage from the Cities of Juneau and

Douglas will not impare the water quality of Gastineau Channel.

     B.  Construct a primary treatment plant and sewer system in

the Mendenhall Glacier Valley Area.

     C.  Screen seafood processing plant wastes and discharge

to municipal sewers, or waters which will provide adequate dilution.

Dispose of solid wastes in accordance with acceptable solid waste

disposal practices.

     D.  Construct a sewer system for the small boat harbor and

discharge into the municipal system.

IV.  RECENT PROGRESS IN POLLUTION CONTROL

     The Juneau-Douglas Area has been cognizant of the dangers of

pollution for some time and various steps have been taken during

the past several years to analyze the problem.

     During 1961 a report entitled "Proposed Street and Sewer

Improvements for the City of Juneau, Alaska" was prepared by I'yller,

Van Doren and Hazard, consulting engineers.  During 1962 a similar

report was prepared by the same firm for the City of Douglas.

Treatment was not envisioned in either report.
                                                                3.7

-------
     In June 1964,  the State Department of Health and Welfare




published a report entitled "Sanitary Facilities for the Greater




Juneau Borough" which exemplified the need for additional engineering




studies for the Mendenhall-Glacier Valley Area.




     In July 1965,  the Alaska State Housing Authority prepared a




report entitled "Comprehensive Plan for Juneau, Alaska", which




touched on the problems of waste disposal, and emphasized the need




for treatment facilities.




     The "Streeter Report" published by the FWPCA in July 1966,




and entitled "Oceanographic and Related Water Quality Studies in




Southeastern Alaska, August 1965" was the result of a voyage which




studied water circulation, salinity, dissolved oxygen, PH, and




bacterial quality in Gastineau Channel.




     The consulting firm of Hill and Ingram, are presently supple-




menting the Streeter Report by a more detailed survey of bacterio-




logical contamination of Gastineau Channel.




     Three small package treatment plants have been constructed




recently in the Mendenhall-Glacier Valley Area.  These serve the




Municipal Airport,  the Glacier Valley School, and a subdivision.




These plants represent a definite improvement over previous methods




of disposal, and indicate a growing awareness of the dangers of




pollution in the community.




V.  BACKGROUND FOR RECOMMENDATIONS




     A.  Pertinent Basin Characteristics




         1.  Geography




             The Juneau-Douglas Area is located in the  Southeastern




Alaska panhandle 900 miles northwest of Seattle and 75 miles from




the open Pacific Ocean.  For  the most part,  the Juneau Area has




                                                                 3.8

-------
developed along the Gastineau Channel and encompasses approximately



25 square miles.  Juneau,  the capitol city of Alaska, is situated



at the base of 3,500 foot Mt. Juneau; in front is Gastineau Channel,



and to the north and south the fingers of the mainland ice field




reach to the fjord-cut coast.  Gastineau Channel separates Juneau



from the smaller residential City of Douglas.  The two are connected



by a bridge and short highway.  Thane to the south and the Mendenhall



Valley to the north, generally outline the remaining geographical



boundries.



         2.  Climate



             The Juneau-Douglas Area has a mild but moist climate



as does all Southeast Alaska.  The weather station at the Juneau




Airport reports an  annual mean temperature of 40.6° F., January



mean 26.2° F. and the July mean 54.7° F.  Annual rainfall is 55.94



inches with the spring and early summer having the lighter monthly



total.  Snowfall annual total is 92.1 inches, however, alternating



rain and snow prevent a heavy accumulation.  The highest tempera-



ture recorded was 34 and the lowest -21.



         3.  Population



             In 1960 the Juneau election disttict had a population



of 9,745.  Since 1960, the population of the area has increased




27.4 percent to 12,413.  The growth, which is the result of increased



government employment, immigration and Alaska's high rate of natural



increase, is taking place in Juneau's suburbs rather than within



the city limits of Juneau or Douglas.



         4.  Industry




             Principal payrolls are from government activities, and



fishing.  Government employment has been the most important part



                                                                   3.9

-------
of Juneau's total employment, comprising about 50 percent.  Summer




visitors, mining, transportation and trade add to the economy.  Approxi-




mately 30 percent is in distributive industries, including transporta-




tion, communications, and public utilities; trade; and finance, insurance




and real estate; and service.  Only 9 percent are in the commodity-




producing industries of mining, construction, and manufacturing.




         5.  Streams and Rivers




             Six small streams enter Gastineau Channel within the




Juneau-Douglas Area and produce small numbers of pink and chum salmon.




Although they are closed to salmon fishing, the younger generation




actively participates in sportfishing for Dolly Varden char.  Salmon




Creek Reservoir provides good eastern brook trout fishing.  Mendenhall




River originates from Mendenhall Glacier, and Mendenhall Lake.  It flows




through a broad, flat valley for a distance of about 5 miles and dis-




charges into tidewater near the Juneau Airport.  The river is very




turbid during summer glacial melt period.  The river is an important




migration route for sockeye salmon seeking clearwater tributaries




entering Mendenhall Lake.  Montana Creek enters Mendenhall River from




the northwest and supports a good run of chum salmon and Dolly Varden




char,  Auke Lake and Creek contains a sizeable run of sockeye salmon.




Pink salmon use the lower reaches of Auke Creek for spawning.  The




sportfish in this system include Dolly Varden char and Cutthroat trout.




         6.  Vegetation




             The vegetation surrounding Juneau is comprised of hemlock




and Sitka spruce in the lowlands and hillsides up to 2,000 feet.  Sparce




cedar stands are found in lowlands.  Alder predominates near stream




banks and hillsides devoid of conifers.  Grass and sedge occupy lowlands




and saltwater marsh areas.  Owing to the high annual rainfall, vegetation





                                                                  3.10

-------
grows to form dense rainforest cover, ouite similar to those found




along the northern coast of Washington and Vancouver Island.




     B.   Present Water Quality Problems




         The cities of Juneau and Douglas discharge untreated domestic




sewage directly to Gastineau Channel.  Evidence of bacteriological




contamination v?as presented in the Streeter Report (see following




pages).   The discharge of untreated wastes to the waters of Gastineau




Channel also leads to objectionable odors and to the presence of




floating solids along the shoreline.   Moreover, the raw sewage discharge




is not consistant vi th either the Alaska Water Pollution Control A-.t




or the State Administrative Code.  At least primary treatment is




required by the State Department of Health.




         Outside the municipal sewer systems, sewage is either dumped




directly into watercourses, or piped to septi: tanks or cesspools.




Pollution from Mendenhall Valley homes has been detected in semi-public




water supplies by the Borough Sanitarian   During February 1?C7, 17




percent of the samples taken were positive.  It is expected that the




frequency v?ill increase as the area  is further developed,   Some atten-




tion has been given to pollution abatement through the installation of




three small package treatment plants.




         All seafood processing for  the Juneau area is handled by one




company.  Waste products are discharged directly to Gastineau Channel




and constitute a source of added organic load during the summer months




Decomposition of organics cause objectionable odors and depressed




oxygen conditions, unfavorable to fishlife.  Lack of industrialization




and forecasts for increased government activities limit the main




pollution problems  to treatment of domestic sewage.




                                                           3,11

-------
 JUNEAU-DOUGLAS
      BRIDGE
FIGURE 1-4.  Raw sewage outfall locations; information provided by State of Alaska,
                          Department of Health and Welfare,

-------
                                    J ILJ fol IE A  111
           JUNEAU--
        DOUGLAS I. BRIDGE
FIGURE 1-3.  Bacteriological sampling locations  -  August 23, 1965.

-------
BACTERIOLOGICAL RESULTS
    August 23, 1965
Sampling
Station
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MPN's
per 100 ml
240
240
240
240+
240
240+
380
240+
2,400+
2,400
2,400+
2,400+
150
88
2,400
2,400
15
2
240+
38
2,400+
2,400
960
240+
150
                                     3.14

-------
         Auke Lake provides the xrater supply for the U S  Fish and

Wildlife Services, Biological Laboratory.  Uncontaminated fresh water

is a requirement for their aquatic experiments   Wells supplying fresh

water for domestic use have become saltv;ater contaminated and the

Laboratory plans to convert to Auke Lake T?ater for primary supply.

VI.  BIBLIOGRAPHY

     1.  Oceanographic and Related Water Quality S-udies in Southeastern
Alaska, August 1965, by the FWPCA.

     2.  Sanitary Facilities for  the Greater Juneau Borough, 1?64,
State of Alaska Department of Health and Welfare.

     3.  Engineering Report, Proposed Street, Drainage, Water and
Sewer Improvements for the City of Douglas, Alaska, 1962, by Wyller,
Van Doren and Hazard.

     4.  Engineering Report, Proposed Street and Sewer Improvements
for the City of Juneau, Alaska, 1961, by Wyller, Van Doren and Hazard.

     5.  The Population and Economy of the Greater Juneau Borough,
1S66, by Development Research Associates.

     6.  Comprehensive Plan for Juneau, Alaska, 1965, Alaska State
Housing Authority.
                                                                3  15

-------
KENAI-SOLDOTNA AREA
                                         4.1

-------
                                                                                                                                                       ALASKA
                                                                                                                                           ALASKA, MAP C
IICAL SURVEY. FEDEBAL CENTEfi. DENVER. COLORADO OR WASHINGTON 25, D. C.

-------
10    5    0
 CHT.H H M.H
                                 20
                                                     Scale 1:1,000,000
                                            30          40         50
                                                                             60
    70
—  ~ I—

-------
                        KENAI-SOLDOTNA AREA






I.  INTRODUCTION




     The purpose of this summary is to examine and evaluate the




sources and extent of pollution in the Kenai-Soldotna area and




to recommend actions designed to satisfy immediate needs.




     Due to the recent discovery and commercial production of




oil and gas, there is a greatly increased potential for accelerated




economic development in the area,  with associated industrial waste




and domestic sewage problems.  An oil refinery was recently built,




and a urea plant is presently under construction.  Advance planning




is also underway for a cryogenics plant to be built nearby.




     The City of Kenai presently operates a small primary treatment




plant which serves portions of the City of Kenai.^  The balance of




the area discharges raw sewage directly into the Kenai River and




Cook Inlet or to septic tanks and cesspools connecting directly




to groundwater supplies.




     These practices are in -violation of the Alaska Water Pollution




Control Act and the Administrative Code.  The State Department of




Health and Welfare requires that a minimum of primary treatment




be given to sewage discharged to surface waters.




     In addition to state requirements, the Presidential Executive




Order 11288 requires federal installations to provide secondary




treatment for all wastes except cooling waters and fish hatchery




wastes, or  preferentially, to discharge wastes into municipal  sewer




systems providing adequate treatment..




     No detailed studies were made in  the preparation of this  summary.




A presumption, was made that a complete Engineering Design Analysis




will preclude physical  implementation  of these recommendations.
                                                                      4.4

-------
s
                               Cape Kasilof
                                              I         ^  ;;'j)VLanair
                                    T 3N-—/  -L  -•£(-• jj|'  St^
                   The Sisters
                                                                     - Hongkong Bend
                                   T  2
                                                                                    KENA1,  ALASKA

-------
 II.  SUMMARY OF MAJOR POLLUTION PROBLEMS, COSTS OF ABATEMENT, AND
      RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES.

 Responsible Agency   Immediate Treat-  Estimated Cost Relative Vicinity
 & Nature of Waste       ment Needs       to Correct   Priority Map Index

 Cities of Kenai,     Connection to modi-  $1,000,000    (A)       1,2
 Soldotna & environs  fied Kenai primary          (+)
 (Domestic Wastes)    treatment plant or
                      construction of com-
                      munity collection
                      and treatment facilities.

 Wildwood Air Force   Secondary treat-        100,000    (A)        3
 Station (Domestic    ment (or connection   (for secondary
 Wastes)              to Kenai city sewer)   treatment)

 Two privately owned  Separation of              *       (A)        1
 fish canneries       solids and discharge
 (Fish Wastes)        of liquid wastes to
                      adequate dilution
                      water.

 Privately owned       Oil  separators.         No  estimate  (B)        4
 oil refinery                                made
 (Oil Wastes)

 Proposed urea plant  No immediate  treat-    No  separable
 and proposed         ment needs  as  design   cost        (C)        4
 cryogenic plant       of plants should have
 (Industrial  Wastes)  abatement provisions
                      built in.

 (+)   This is a rough  estimate for  the purposes  of this report.  A
      feasibility  study  would  be  required to  determine whether  a
      single  system or separate systems are apropos.

 *    The estimated cost to correct would be  included in the cost of
      a municipal  interceptor  system.

 III.  IMMEDIATE CONTROL NEEDS

      The Kenai-Soldotna area  is one of the most  rapidly developing

 portions  of  the State due  to  the recent  commercial production of

 oil  and  gas  nearby.   The recent completion of an oil refinery, the

 present  construction  of a  urea plant,  and the planned construction

 of a cryogenics plant indicate a potential for a highly industrialized

 development of the  entire  surrounding  area.

     Prior to the discovery and commercial production of oil and

gas, the main industry was the canning of salmon.  Two canneries
                                                                  4.6

-------
                            KW ANCHORAGE
                                    S E W A R D
           PIPELINE   ROUTES
OILAND GAS YEARBOOK -  I960               SCALE ,-, |& MlLES

-------
are presently situated on the Kenai River, and canning will probably




remain an important industry.




     Kenai is also near  the center of one of the largest migration




routes for anadromous fish in Alaska, and the continued discharge




of untreated pollutants  into these waters can be expected to cause




the eventual depletion,  both in quantity and quality of the valuable




resource.  Nearby razor  clam beds can also be expected to be adversely




affected.  The discharge of this untreated sewage and fish waste




also leads to deterioration of the waters of the Kenai River and




shore areas immediately  surrounding Kenai, creating potential health




hazards and leading to aesthetic, odor,  and nuisance problems.  The




probable continued viability of pathogens in the cold and rapidly




moving waters of Cook Inlet greatly increase the potential for the




widespread distribution of waterborne diseases.




     The widespread use of septic tanks and cesspools has led to




an increasing frequency of bacterial pollution in groundwater




and has caused much concern since most potable water supplies in




the Kenai-Soldotna area originate in shallow wells.  This practice




can only add to the existing hazard and increase as the area is




developed for residential use.




     In order to abate the existing pollution problem in the Kenai-




Soldotna area,  the following immediate steps are recommended,  in




order of priority:



     A.  (Alternate 1)




         Construct interceptor and trunk sewers to connect the




Kenai City treatment plant with the suburban areas.




         (Alternate 2)



         Construct separate collection and package-type treatment




                                                                  4.8

-------
 systems  for  individual  population  and  commercial  centers.
          (A  project  to  install  an  aerated  lagoon  at Wildwood Air
 Force  Station  is  presently  contemplated.   Estimated cost  is about
 $100,000.)
          The choice  between these  two  alternates  would be  contingent
 on  the results  of a  detailed engineering study comparing  the relative
 costs  of each.  Cost of such a  study is estimated at about $10,000.
     B.   Terminate the  present  practice of disposing of cannery
 wastes by direct  discharge  to the  Kenai River.  Disposal of solids
 should be in accordance with acceptable solid waste disposal practices.
 IV.  RECENT  PROGRESS IN POLLUTION  CONTROL
     The  City of  Kenai  recently constructed a primary sewage treatment
 plant  and collection system which  serves the core area of the city,
 but does  not serve outlying areas  or the two canneries.  The treat-
ment plant is an  18' "Spiragester", detailed in Lakeside Engineering
Corp.  Bulletin No. 136.
     The  Kenai Peninsula Borough Sanitarian is monitoring the
bacterial quality  of potable groundwater supplies and Borough
records attest to  the need  for cessation of discharge of cesspool
and septic tank effluent to  groundwater aquifers.
     Wildwood Air  Force Station is presently programming an aerated
lagoon for the treatment of  sewage.
     Aside from the  foregoing there are no known definitive plans
for the abatement  of pollution in  the Kenai-Soldotna Area.
V.  BACKGROUND FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
     A.  Pertinent Basin Characteristics
          1.   Geography
             The Kenai-Soldotna area is located in a generally
                                                               4.9

-------
 flat section of the central-west coastal region of the Kenai Peninsula.




 (See map.)   The geographical area comprises approximately 150 square




 miles and includes two principal population centers,  Kenai and




 Soldotna.  These cities are served by the Sterling Highway,  whereby




 all weather road affords links to Homer,  Seward,  and  Anchorage.




          2.  Topography and Geology




              Kenai Peninsula is  comprised of two geophysically and




 geologically dissimilar districts.   These are the Kenai Mountains




 which make  up the largest  portions  of the eastern and southern parts




 and the Kenai Lowland  which makes up the  western part.  The  eastern




 area is mountainous with peaks rising to  6,000 feet.   The Lowlands




 are from  sea level to  about 2,000 feet.   The Kenai-Soldotna  area




 is  located  in the Lowlands.




          3.   Climate



              The  climate of the  Kenai-Soldotna area is characterized by




 cool  summers  and  relatively mild winters,  compared to  interior Alaska.




 The Kenai Mountains to  the  east  rise  abruptly to  5-6,000  feet and




 prevent warm  moist Pacific  Ocean air  from entering the area  in any




 direction except  the southwest.   Consequently,  although Kenai is




 located on  an arm of the Pacific  Ocean, its  climate is more con-




 tinental  than marine.



              The  average annual  rainfall, based on standard normals




 for  the period 1931-1960, is 19.03 inches.   Precipitation  is light




 in  the winter with increasing  storm frequency during spring and




 summer.  Maximums  are reached  in  September.  Slightly more than




46 per cent of the mean annual precipitation falls during  the 3-month




period, July  through September.



              Seasonal snowfall is about five feet.  Mean annual



                                                                 4.10

-------
 temperature is 33.3° F., while the lowest ever recorded was -48° F.




 during February 1947.  The highest ever recorded was 89° F. in




 September 1883.  Temperatures above 80* F. are uncommon.  A frost




 free season of 90 days can be expected between May and the latter




 part of August.




          4.  Population




              The population of the Kenai-Soldotna area is about




 5,000.   This is a five-fold increase over the reported 1,000 in




 1960.  The large increase can be  attributed to the development of




 the oil industry.   By 1980 nearly 15,000 people are anticipated to




 be living in the Kenai-Soldotna area.




          5.   Industry




              Fishing and oil,  in  that  order,  are  the  chief  industries




 of the  area.   Beginning in 1957 when oil was  first discovered  by




 Richfield Oil  Company in the  Swanson River  field  north  of Kenai,




 exploration, development,  production,  refining  and shipping have




 proceeded at a steady pace.   A natural gas pipeline,  constructed




 in 1961,  connects wells  located six miles south of Kenai  with




 Anchorage.  Oil is refined by  Standard Oil Company into jet fuel,




 diesel,  and stove oil a few miles northwest of Kenai  at Nikiski.




 New construction includes an ammonia -  urea, fertilizer complex.




 A  gas liquification plant is contemplated in the near future.




 All forecasts  include Kenai-Soldotna to be the hub of oil activities




 for the Kenai Peninsula and offshore Cook Inlet.




         6,  Streams and Rivers




             Kenai River and tributaries are the only streams




of consequence to be considered in this report.  The Kenai River




originates from Kenai Lake, flows  through Skilak Lake, and then




                                                                4.11

-------
continues across the Lowland discharging into Cook Inlet at the




City of Kenai.  The river drains 2,000 square miles and is the largest




and most important river on the Kenai Peninsula.  A maximum discharge




of 16,000 cfs has been recorded during September at Soldotna.   No




winter rainimums are listed in the flow data.




     The Kenai River is turbid during ice free months owing to




glacial silt.  The river clears in the winter when glacial melt is




reduced.




     Chinook, coho, pink, and sockeye salmon ascend Kenai River




to spawning grounds.  The river system is known to support the




largest salmon runs on the Kenai Peninsula, and except for the




Susitna River, may be the largest producer in Cook Inlet.  Compared




to the total salmon caught by commercial fishermen in Cook Inlet




during 1966, more than half were from the vicinity of Kenai.




Although drift gillnets provide the largest effort, set gillnets




along beaches in the Kenai area contribute a substantial catch.




     Besides being important to commercial fishermen, the Kenai




River supports an intensive sportsfishery.  Dolly Varden char,




rainbow trout and whitefish are taken by anglers year round.




Boating is popular in the river section between Soldotna and




Kenai.  Two small tributaries, Soldotna Creek and Beaver Creek,




contain Dolly Varden and rainbow trout.  These streams are popular




xtfith young anglers and will continue receiving heavy use as access




is improved.  The Alaska Department of Fish and Game places high




value on these streams for a coho salmon rearing area.




     The Kenai River is under study by the State Department of




Health and Welfare in a program of describing streams and rivers




which are within the realm of becoming polluted.  The Kenai River




                                                                 4.12

-------
receives raw domestic sewage from permanent residences and businesses
at Soldotna and Kenai.  Should the trend continue, the value of the
river for commercial and recreational use will be impared.
     B.  Present Water Quality Problems
         1.  Domestic Pollution Sources
             At the present time domestic sex^age from the following
areas is being discharged directly into the Kenai River or Cook
Inlet through numerous small outfalls.
             a.  City of Kenai                      30,000 gpd.
             b.  Kenai High School                    3000 gpd.
             c.  Momsen Subdivision                   1500 gpd.
             d.  Soldotna Dry Cleaning Plant           unknown
             e.  River Terrace Trailer Court           unknown
             f,  Concrete Block Plant                  unknown
             g.  An estimated 30 to 50 homes           unknown
                 in the Soldotna Area discharge
                 raw sextfage directly to the Kenai River.
             h.  Wildwood Air Force Station         35,000 gpd.
             The balance of the area discharges sewage through
septic tanks or cesspools which drain into the groundwater supply.
Aside from bacteriological tests which indicated unsatisfactory
quality, an outbreak of infectious hepatitis, nearing epidemic
proportions, x-jas recorded in 1963.
         2.  Cannery Wastes
             During the fishing season the canneries dispose of
fish waste by  direct discharge into the lower Kenai River.  About
1/3 of the total catch is estimated to be waste.  In 1962 the  amount
of this waste  was about 54,000 pounds per day, equivalent to about
                                                                4.13

-------
 21,000  Ibs.  B.O.D.  (  5  day  20°  C).   Associated  vessel  operations

 additionally discharge  spoiled  fish,  untreated  sewage,  and bilgewater

 near  the  canneries.

          When added to  the  natural  pollution load  of  spawned out

 dead  salmon,  estimated  to average about  21,000  Ibs. of B.O.D.  per

 day,  the  results  are  very noticeable!  A count  by  an  engineer  revealed

 salmon  heads at about a 10  foot spacing  and  whole  spawned  out  salmon

 at a  spacing of 50',  along  the  beach at  the  north  side of  the

 entrance  to  Kenai River.  The odor  is not as severe as would be

 expected  in  a warmer  climate however.

          Due to cold  water  temperatures,  the closeness of  the

 canneries to Knik Arm,  (where a high dilution factor  is available),

 and the large size of fish  particles, the full  B.O.D.  of this

waste would  not be expected to  be exerted on the Kenai River.

Consequently, dissolved oxygen  levels may not have fallen  to the

extent of affecting the salmon  run,   although this assumption should

be verified  by field  testing.

          If,   as at Kodiak,   local ordinance required the grinding

of wastes before discharge,  the  consequent increase in the  ratio

of surface area to mass would be expected to adversly  affect dis-

solved oxygen concentration in  the Kenai  River.

VI.  BIBLIOGRAPHY

     1.  Engineer's Preliminary Report on a  Sewage Collection  and
Disposal System for Kenai,  Alaska,  prepared  by Harold  H. Galliett, Jr.,
1963.

     2.  Kenai River  Stream Study for State  of Alaska,  Department of
Health and Welfare,  by Tryck,  Nyroan  and Hayes (Presently in  prepa-
ration) .

     3.  Comprehensive Plan, Kenai,  Alaska,  prepared by Alaska State
Housing Authority, 1962.


                                                                   4.14

-------
     4.  U.S.G.S. Water Resources Data for Alaska, 1965.

     5.  U.S. Weather Bureau, Climatography of the United States,
No. 86-43.

     6.  State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game, Soldotna.

     7.  U.S.F.S., Unpublished Report, Reconnaissance of Water
Resources of Alaska, Kenai Peninsula Subregion.
                                                                 4.15

-------
KETCHIKAN AREA
                                       5.1

-------



--
                      \   *s  I
                      /-;
                                                             vs               v:

                                                                                                 •
                                                                   KETCHIKAN   AREA


                     rii coiomtio o« w*snm«To» 15 o c

-------
         %»
          •Q.
&3:ss
\>. \
'Light
           '%
       /
      /



   /
      /     Betton Pt^-'T1-
                           /v?              ::•-'•'"'     i ST.-  -   ^ ^ :/w->' '  :^Kn:iJ^i^R ^^/iV-J- <
                                    ^^Lonng:   i/ste;;S^^?ft 1 H^fWlSS

                            ---^^
                            Cedarlsland,	;'- tiS?      X j ^ 'V^ >£^. I ^ ^!^' O A' .' fr  >/V"
                           Moser Island *- Cod '  ^              —'-^-'"i -"-[— '--v.-^'^r''"--  ---p-:':]T-'-rl r1 V--§-—J-j^,
                         Stack Island  v  -2^ *^"       - ;vj ~'<             '*\\S'-f':- '    \ **//' \c' V?'V  ^"~
                            Ll ^     *. ^ ''      /..)i'T;-'Hu// '              . V- •/"V'~,^''J/ X^T   i^'  ~'?:--x.^,^'-.,
                         Granto   '  .. ••   ^       l.,jke      t,    ,
                         Island         ' v            .  .,'    : '•
     /  "A Bettor?Xu^'?"
^    '^S'!"' ls.and.^7
Ex-   I       ;,,, Betton    _^ ,
     I        t,  Head
.    ;              --

               /^~   / Clover/V" '""V    " "-*• '
       Pup Island.-  ,f I    ft.:   b- '  *'
  /               0Lt    • .* '   ^    ''s.

/      Survey Pt/ ^^'•;i',     %;
                          V53^
                                                      Leash
                                           •  ;' / v  •    -T^ •  •• • .-'  r . '   . ^ .-
                                       ^ ._,-'•      /,ercsi  r .   .Granite I
                                       S^i,     mssa*
                                         . ,-- Harriet Hunt  *.&i          ^   ; 5 N^
                                        ""'  *""•"•              ;:-cv,r?
       Survey Pt/   ..V*'/,                             '~ VL'lV°  '""'  •   i V
  .o        RadlTry.'7ir .U S Co»pS Gu-ini ,"3"    "                        Coon ?  ~l£'(.
       tHiggms-.-  -.btjitioi^             Thorntop     ,^                ."••c



  /nside r     Reel   •, _\          V    -'y' CfDHirll''    '  .JJ -^Maf--   O  '
  Valle^atRk  .  .   ^,    >i. 1_,   ,v\*       -.    /.a/vC        -' \  l   ^  ^".i-,. „-'• /'Mtn   U
                                                         i uiHWV-t  O  l_' AA  IN  LJ    '  :V.*._,j, D
                                              Yellow Hill    Mtn                           CraO tfoy
                                             Cedar Pt-     ./•'••']. ,!    P«i'|)/e  /;fltc  ^,   ^,/x     .^
                                              Smuggler'     /;^" '-. N(J Ri^S6 ;   . ^.   l'V,\   .^A'Krain Bay
                                                 Core    ;-•-'  "_'0s  .;.•,-  As^ssiz-:T.  ;, ^!-v    '^
                                                                                                               V i Twin Islands
                                                                                                                 '& South T«in
                                                                                                                        t Winsl
                                     K.dReel.
                                                           .
                                             ""^.:' Annette  Island
                                                             i Davison Mtn
                                                 SCALE 1:250000

                                                       10
                                                        ^
                                                                            15
                                                                            KETCHIKAN,  ALASKA

                                                                                    20	25 MILES
                                                                                      _ .                 	

-------
                   IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS




                            KETCHIKAN AREA




I.  INTRODUCTION



     This report will serve to delineate and evaluate the sources and




extent of pollution in the area within the bounds of the Gateway Borough




including the City of Ketchikan.  Actions recommended here are proposed




to solve existing problems and those presently developing.  The waterways




included in this area are Tongass Narrows and several small coves and




short creeks.  Information presented here is based on data obtained from




the local government agencies, the State of Alaska Water Pollution Control




Activity of the Department of Health and Welfare, and reports of the




Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.  Water quality information




is derived from previous investigations, and no field work was performed




for purposes of this report.




     Recommendations of this report are based on the best information




available with regard to water quality conditions and immediate pollution




control needs.  Consequently, only those more obvious problems have been




presented.  Also, owing to the sinuous coast line and the typical archi-




peligo type of landforms and waterways, the area concerned is relatively




small and is considered to have little if any effect on waters in con-




tiguous areas.



     Authority for this report is contained in Section (3) of the Federal




Water Pollution Control Act as amended, which covers initiating of compre-




hensive programs for abating pollution  in interstate waters.  The




Presidential Executive Order  11288 covering pollution by  governmental




operations;and the Alaska  Statute, Water Pollution Control Act; and con-




sequent regulations and proposed water  quality standards  promulgated there-




under were all considered  in  deliberation on the pollution needs given  in




this report.

-------
                                                                     ! Q
                                                                     O
o
       Ohio Rock ,  -
               ru Channel
                      East d
                                                       \
                                                                                             V
                                                           />
                                                        WarO Mtn''--
                                      o
       O ~   \
                   -^
   :   A

                                                                                                 v,
!   S  ,11'   A  !N   D
•,NV h.  *"
                                                                                        \
                                                                                          \ \   \

-------
 II.  SUMMARY OF POLLUTION PROBLEMS

      Pollution of Tongass Narrows is technical in nature since degradation

 of the waters is difficult to demonstrate due to significantly voluminous

 tidal currents, with one exception; that is the industrial waste pollution

 of Wards Cove by Ketchikan Pulp Company, and it is abundantly obvious.

 Corrective proposals are tabulated below:
 Responsibility

 1.   City of Ketchikan



 2.   U.S. Coast Guard
                           Need

                    Interceptors and adequate
                    treatment with post
                    chlorination

                    Secondary treatment with
                    post chlorination
 3.


 4.
Fisheries Products  Solids removal and adequate
Processors          dilution

Ketchikan Pulp Co.  Improved solids handling.
                    Primary treatment of sulfite
                    waste liquor and extend
                    outfall to adequate dilution.
     Individual pre-
     mises outside
     developed areas
                    Minimum of primary treat-
                    ment and chlorination.
                    Outfalls to deep water
     City of Ketchikan   Proper disposal of refuse,
     and Gateway         garbage and junk
     Borough
 7.   Small privately
     owned sawmills

 8.   Privately owned
     sand and gravel
     suppliers
 9.
Local Government
and commercial
water freight
companies
                    Removal of solid wastes
                    from waterway

                    Sedimentation of wash water
                    prior to discharge
Collection of vessel
sewage and wastes and
discharge to municipal
system
10.
Small boat harbors  Institutional needs are a com-
                    prehensive area wide sewerage
                    and industrial waste control
                    plan by the joint efforts of the
                    City of Ketchikan and Gateway
                    Borough.  Informal visits
                    with officials of these
                                   Relative  Vicinity
                                   Priority  Map Index

                                      (A)        1
                                      (A)        2


                                      (A)    scattered


                                      (A)        3
(B)



(B)



(B)


(B)



(B)
                                      (C)
                                             scattered
                                                                 area wide
                                             scattered
                                             scattered
scattered
                                                                      area wide
                                                                         5.5

-------
Responsibility                 Need                            Priority

Small boat harbors             agencies indicate such
(Continued)                    studies are presently being
                               undertaken.  Also underway
                               is the State of Alaska's
                               action to bring its water
                               quality standards into
                               harmony with the requirements
                               of the Federal Water Pollution
                               Control Act, Section (10) as
                               amended in 1965.

III.  IMMEDIATE CONTROL NEEDS

     Several definite actions are indicated to abate existing pollution

of waters tributary to Tongass Narrows and to prevent future degradation

of these waters and enhance the many beneficial uses:

     1.  Waste Treatment

         The City of Ketchikan and the Gateway Borough should construct

interceptor sewers and one or more treatment plants with appropriate out-

fall to meet the needs of the above mentioned water quality standards.

Design population for this project would be about 12,000 persons.  This

is a high priority project.  Individual premise,  commercial,  and residen-

tial requirements will not be itemized here.

     Fish processing plants in the Ketchikan area should provide inplant

separation of solids and discharge of remaining liquid wastes to adequate

dilution water in Tongass Narrows.  Some joint activity with the municipal

sewer system may be indicated.  Solids should be processed for by-products

or disposed of so no nuisance pollution will result.

     The U. S. Coast Guard is designing a collection system and secondary

treatment for all liquid wastes from its Ketchikan Base as well as those

from its assigned and itinerant vessels.
                                                                   5.7

-------
     The Ketchikan Pulp Company which operates a magnesium oxide process




mill at Ward Cove should:  (1) further reduce solid wastes deposited in




the waterway, (2) provide a minimum flow in Ward Creek through its catch-




ment dam to protect spawning habitat for historic runs of anadromous




fish and to enhance the esthetic values of the U.S. Forest Service




Recreational Area which includes the creek bed below the dam, (3) collect




liquid wastes and provide adequate sedimentation and sludge disposal to




minimize the quantities of fine solids in the mill sewage, and (4) extend




the mill outfall to a location which would assure adequate dilution in




Tongass Narrows.  These last two would entail a major effort and expendi-




ture of funds, and only additional treatment beyond primary would sub-




stitute for the need for an outfall extention.




     2.  Solid Wastes Disposal




         The local governments should jointly provide for refuse,




garbage, and junk disposal in a manner which will keep all such matter




from entering the waterway or being deposited at the high tide line.




The sawmills in the area should discontinue depositing solid wastes in




the waterway.




     3.  Vessel Generated Sewage




         The steamship companies and local governments should jointly




provide facilities to receive x;astes from docked vessels and require




that self-contained sewage handling equipment be used on all vessels




navigating inshore or mooring at local facilities.




     Shoreside toilet facilities for permanent and itinerant vessel




crews should be provided at all small boat harbors.  Any sewage dis-




charge into confined intertidal waters should be discontinued.






                                                              5.8

-------
     4.  Institutional Needs

         The state and local public health and water pollution control

activities must be aided in establishing an effective surveillance and

enforcement program if any degree of pollution abatement and prevention

is to be attained.  The cooperation and influence of the full scope of

the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration program is needed in

this effort.

     5.  Research

         Needed investigations in handling of fish processing wastes

and pulp mill waste disposal ate covered tn other reports accompanying

this submittal.

IV.  COSTS

     Municipality                             Estimated Cost

     City of Ketchikan and Gateway
     Borough interceptors and treatment
     works harbor collection facilities         $2,100,000

     Fisheries Processors

     Collection and disposal facilities         $1,500,000

     Pulp Mill Wastes

     Treatment plant mill outfall               $2,250,000

     IJ. S  Coast Guard Base

     Collection system treatment works          $  100,000

     Individual Premises

     Individual unit  for estimate Number 500   $1,000,000

V.  RECENT PROGRESS IN POLLUTION CONTROL

     In recent years the City of Ketchikan has extended ecvcral outfalls

to deeper water and has eliminated others.  While this does tiot result in

BOD removal, it does remove floating sewage solids from waterfront

beaches and floats.
                                                                  5.9

-------
     The Ketchikan Pulp Company has installed new wood room screening




devices to remove a greater percentage of bark and other solids from




wood room sewers.  They have also installed a new chemical recovery




boiler to keep up with their increased production.  Studies by FWPCA,




NW Regional Office, during 1965, established the efficiency of the mill




waste product procedures.




     Under the program of the federal agencies to abate environmental




pollution as instructed  in Executive Order 11288, the U. S. Coast Guard




has budgeted for and placed in design status a construction project to




provide interceptors, vessel wastes collection, and a secondary sewage




treatment plant.  Their promptness and thoroughness in this program is




exemplary.




VI.  BACKGROUND




     A.  Pertinent Basin Characteristics




         The landforms of the Ketchikan area were created by pleistocene




glaciers resulting in mountains rising steeply from sea level.  The




waterways are the typical fjords of glacial coastlines.  The steep




slopes are heavily forested by predominantly spruce and hemlock timber,




with the exception of recently "clear-cut" logged areas.  Muskeg meadows




cover any relatively level ground.   The shorelines of the islands are




typically bare rock with a few gravel or shingle beaches situated in




coves exposed to wave action.




     Tongass Narrows, a stretch of the "Inland Passage" to Alaska, is




about 16 miles long and lies in a SE-NW direction.  Tidal currents vary




from .2 to 1.2 knots with mean tide fluctuations of about 13 feet.  The




water has a salinity of about 30 parts per thousand with relatively fresh




surface layers of 6 to 10 feet depending on the recent precipitation.





                                                                 5.10

-------
     The climate is cold maritime and boasts the unusally high average




annual rainfall of 155 inches.  The coniferous rain forest provides




only moderate regulation to the runoff of this great precipitation, owing




to the steep profile of all the watersheds.  The accompanying vicinity




maps adequately show the several waterways of the area covered in this




report.  The major streams in the area are used for power generation,




water supply, and have significant recreational use.  In addition, the




marine waters are used extensively for commercial and sports fishing,




transportation, storage of logs, and for commercial transportation.




     B.  Water Quality Problems




         Tongass Narrows, which approximates sea water in salinity,




receives all of the raw sewage from the municipal sewers of Ketchikan




and from a great many residential areas along beaches outside the city.




These waters are considered polluted since present state water quality




standards require a minimum of primary treatment with effective disin-




fection.  Updated standards are presently being adopted and may require




a higher degree of treatment.




     Waste products from seafood processors are discharged direct to the




channel beaches.  This practice creates a nuisance, and in some cases




results in degradation of the waterway.  A practical method of dealing




with fishery wastes should be developed and implemented.




     Two minor pollution problems, which must nonetheless be kept in




mind,  are accidental oily discharges from bulk petroleum products ter-




minals and deleterious effects of log storage due to blocking of daylight




and deposition of loose bark.




     The two small boat harbors are polluted by sanitary sewage dis-




charged from vessels; some permanent,   others itinerant.  These harbors




are essentially closed bodies of brackish water with very little circulation.



                                                                   5.11

-------
     Ward Cove, a small narrow-necked body of seawater about 4 miles




north of Ketchikan and opening into Tongass Narrows,  is the site of




the Ketchikan Pulp Company mill.  This Company uses a magnesium oxide-




based pulping process of about 600 tons per day capacity and manufactures




dissolving grade pulp for export.  Mill effluent consisting of wood fines




and spent sulfite liquor (SSL) is carried in 45 million gallons of




water a day.  Loss of solids from the mill averages 320 tons a day.  The




mill sewer discharges adjacent to the buildings in a small bight on the




north shore of the cove.




     A survey of Ward Cove water quality was conducted by FWPCA in late




August 1965.  Concentrations of sulfite waste liquor in the cove were




extremely high and above accepted toxicity levels known to be lethal to




small fishes and fish food organisms.  Further evidence of pollution is




the depressed levels of dissolved oxygen and pH below the minimums set




down in the Alaska Water Quality criteria contained in their pollution




control regulations.




     In order to abate the demonstrated pollution,  primary treatment of




mill sewer effluent and extension of mill sewer outfall to a location




where adequate dilution is available will be necessary.




VII.  BIBLIOGRAPHY




     1.  Oceanographic and Related Water Quality Studies in South-




eastern Alaska, August 1965, FWPCA,  NW Region.




     2.  Ward Cove Survey,  Alaska Water Pollution Control Board Report No. 7.




     3.  Alaska Administrative Code,  Title 7,  Sub Chapter 4.




     4.  Various publications of data such as Tide Tables, Cllmatological




Summary,  USGS Stream Flow Records, etc.
                                                                  5.12

-------
KODIAK AREA
                                      6.1

-------

                                                                                                                                              AliASKA.MA'
°L°5ICAL SURVEY, FEDERAL  CENT
                             Efl. DENVER. COLORADO  OR  WASHINGTON 25. 0. C.

-------
                 „ M 0  1
Lar-  ,, 1
        I,
                                                    c}; I .v / •, /;
                                                       ISA  \
                                                    U\  r I
                                                 S.it  -. i
                                                                                  - T,^^
                                                                                    i
                                                                                  y~; G'CMiieS

                                                                                          o
                                                                    Peak
               Stldik ''I

                  Long I
                                  SCALE  1  250000
                                                                              KODIAK,  ALASKA

-------
                            KODIAK AREA


I.  INTRODUCTION

     The purpose of this summary is to examine and evaluate the sources

and extent of pollution in the Kodiak Area and to recommend actions

designed to satisfy immediate needs.

     Except for occasional small septic tanks there are no sewage

treatment plants in either the City of Kodiak or the nearby U. S.

Naval Station.  All sewage and septic tank  effluent and seafood pro*

cessing wastes are discharged untreated into Kodiak Harbor, and Woraens

Bay.

     These practices are inconsistant with the Alaska Water Pollution

Control Act and the State Administrative Code.  The State Department

of Health requires that a minimum of primary treatment be given to

sewage discharged to surface waters.

     In addition to State requirements, Presidential Executive Order

11288  requires Federal installations to provide secondary treatment

for all wastes.

     The recommendations presented herein, differ from recommendations

contained in a report entitled "Feasibility Study for Treatment of

Sewage at U. S. Naval Station, Kodiak, Alaska" by Livingstone, Moore

and Wallace, Inc., Consulting Engineers.  Since their recommendation

for only primary treatment is not consistent with Presidential Order

11288, a request for waiver of this requirement has been made by the

Navy.

     No detailed studies were made in the preparation of this summary,

as implementation of these recommendations will require a more detailed

engineering design analysis.
                                                                   6.4

-------
o     -  n       i       A      K
•fot*
               31
                                                  N i^f  '/Mary I
   C
N   A   V



/    t
      t-,
     o

                               A   L


                                                                                                                                           ,.*-'

-------
KODIAK ARE,.


II.  SUMMARY OF MAJOR POLLUTION PROBLEMS, COSTS OF ABATEMENT, AND
     RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES.

Responsible Agency  Immediate Treatment  Estimated Cost Relative Vicinity
& Nature of Waste   	Needs	    to Correct   Priority Map Index

Kodiak Naval Sta-   Secondary treatment     2,500,000      (A)       1
tion (Domestic      and disinfection
sewage)

Kodiak Naval Com-   Secondary treatment       250,000      (A)       1
munication Station  and disinfection
(Domestic sewage)

City of Kodiak and  Secondary treatment     1,500,000      (A)       2
Suburban areas      and disinfection
(Domestic sewage)

18 privately owned  Separation of solids      100,000      (B)       2
seafood processing  at cannery and dis-
plants (seafood     posal of liquids to
wastes)             adequate dilution
                    water.  Solids to be
                    disposed of by owner of
                    cannery in accordance
                    with local solid waste
                    disposal practices.
                    (Also please refer to
                    section of this report
                    pertaining to fish
                    industry)

Boat Harbor         Primary treatment          50,000      (B)       2
(Domestic Wastes)   and disinfection
                    (connect to municipal
                    system)

III.  IMMEDIATE CONTROL NEEDS

     The Kodiak area economy is based essentially on fishing  and  fish

product manufacturing, with some income derived from agriculture,

tourism and military payrolls.  The Kodiak area produces  about  30%

of Alaska's canned crab production and about  50% of the frozen  crab

production.  The importance of this industry  is apparent  when one

considers that approximately 90% of the Pacific Coast  crab production

comes from Alaska.

                                                                 6.5

-------
KODIAK AREA






     At the present time, all of Kodiak's sewers and waste fishery




products are discharged directly into tidewater along the cities




waterfront.



     The continued discharge of untreated pollutants into the waters




of Kodiak Harbor has led to a depletion in water quality.  This dis-




charge also leads to deterioration of the waters and shore areas




surrounding the City of Kodiak and the Naval Station, creating




potential health hazards and leading to aesthetic and nuisance




problems.




     Residential areas outside the municipal water and sewer system




use shallow wells (actually sumps), and septic  tanks.  Groundwater




pollution  from septic tank drainfields has been detected  in most of




the domestic water wells tested.




     In order to abate the existing pollution problem in  the Kodiak




area,  the  following Immediate  steps are recommended, in order of priority.




     A.  Construct interceptor sewers and  treatment  plants  to treat




all domestic wastes originating  at U.S. Naval facilities  at Kodiak.




     B.  Extend  the existing sewer system  in  the City of  Kodiak to




areas  not  nov; served by  sewers.  Construct a  primary treatment  plant




and intercept existing outfalls.




     C.  Dispose of liquid  fish  processing waste  to  adequate dilution




water.  Separate  solids  at  cannery and  dispose  of  them by suitable




solid  waste  disposal  practices.
                                                               6.7

-------
KODIAK AREA








IV.  RECENT PROGRESS IN POLLUTION CONTROL




     The disposal of seafood processing solid wastes presents a fairly




sizable problem at Kodiak.  The City of Kodiak is presently attempting




to reach a solution, by requesting seafood processors to participate




in the funding of a marine protein concentrate pilot plant.




     The Governor of Alaska has endorsed the establishment of a




Fisheries Research Center for the state.  There are indications that




the institution might be located in Kodiak.  The National Council




on Marine Resources and Engineering Developments is also expected to




provide some insight into the possible uses of seafood wastes, and




provide leadership in the development of useful products.  By dis-




covering a by-product use for seafood wastes the existing problems




of waste disposal will be greatly simplified.




     The Navy Department engaged the consulting firm of Livingstone,




Moore, and Wallace, Inc. to make a feasibility study of the sewage




disposal system at the U.S. Naval Station and Communication Station




at Kodiak.  This report was completed in 1965, and the Navy has sub-




mitted programming documents  (DD form 1391) for the correction of




deficiencies noted in this report.




     An urban renewal project  (R-19, Stage II) is presently under




construction and includes modifications to the Kodiak City Sewer




System; however, no treatment plant is envisioned.




V.  BACKGROUND FOR RECOMMENDATIONS




     A.  Pertinent Characteristics




         1.  Geography




                                                               6.8

-------
KODIAK AREA








             Kodiak Island, the largest island among the Kodiak group,




is located about 35 miles east of the Alaskan Peninsula and 250 miles




southwest of Anchorage.




             The Kodiak Area, discussed on this summary, is situated




on the northeastern corner of Kodiak Island,  This area is delineated




by the corporate limits of the City of Kodiak, and the principal




population center of the U.S. Naval Station.  The total geographic




area to be considered comprises approximately 2,000 acres.




         2.  Topography and Geology




             Kodiak Island is a rugged mountainous region with peak




elevations exceeding 4,000 feet.  The shoreline is indented with




numerous bay and long narrow fjords.  The intricate shorelines were




eroded by Ice Age Glaciation.




             The geology of the island is a southern extension of




formations on the Kenai Peninsula and exhibits rocks of Mesozoic



and earlier ages.




             The City of Kodiak is nestled at the foot of 1,500 foot




Pillar Mountain, on a bench which more or less parallels St. Paul




Harbor.  Elevations range from 20 feet near the coast line to several




hundred feet  southwest; where the bench narrows, and northeast where




the bench blends into rolling hills dotted with small lakes and swamps.




Slopes ranging between 7 and 807, grade,are a factor which has definitely




restricted development in the Kodiak metropolitan area.  The trend of




growth is east, where slopes are more gentle.
                                                                 6.9

-------
KODIAK AREA








             The U.S. Naval Station is located approximately 7 miles




southwest of Kodiak on gently rolling terrain between the outlet of




Buskin River and Womens Bay.  Topographic features are similar to




Kodiak.




         3.  Climate




             The City of Kodiak has a maritime climate, tempered by




the Japanese Current which sweeps northeastward along the coast of




the Alaska Peninsula.  Kodiak exhibits fairly stable daily tempera-




tures and maximums seldom reach 70 degrees.  The highest temperature




ever recorded was 86° in June 1963, while the lowest was -9°F in




January, 1917.




             The mean temperature is a mild 40.69F.  The average




length of the frost-free season is 171 days and generally extends




from about the first of May to the middle of October.




             Precipitation is abundant all year, and no month averages




less that 3 1/2 inches of rain.  The least rain occurs in March,




July and August.  October is the wettest month and receives an average




of more than 7 inches.  During the winter remaining snow on the ground




seldom exceeds 10 inches.




             Strong winds are common in the winter and maximum velocities




of 92 knots have been recorded.




         4.  Population




             In 1960 the population of the City of Kodiak was 3,000.




Following  the 1964 earthquake and subsequent  implementation of  the




urban renewal project plus rapid expansion of the King Crab industry




                                                                  6.10

-------
KODIAK AREA





the population swelled to the present estimate of 7,500.  Two thousand


persons are estimated to reside in areas outside of the city confines.


         5,  Industry


             The basic industry of Kodiak is seafood processing.


Tourism and guide service for hunting the famous Kodiak Bear are of


importance.  Kodiak also serves as the trade and service center for


a large part of the Aleutian Islands.


             For 20 years prior to 1951 the economy of the community


depended about half and half on the Naval Station and the fishing


industry.  However, since 1951 the local fishing industry has been


expanded to include King Crab and shrimp.  During 1966 over 90


million pounds of King Crab were caught and processed in the Kodiak


area.


             The demand for fish products especially King Crab,


shrimp, and halibut has changed Kodiak from a relatively small sporadic


and seasonal salmon canning economy into one with large investments


and year-round payrolls.


             Fourteen fish product companies line the waterfront


where  just four years ago only three operated.


             Before 1966, boat landings of King Crab exceeded the


capacity of available processors and thus delayed boats from unloading.


In  addition, crab canneries ran short of fresh water and unvoluntarily


ceased operation several times during the summer.  Consequently,


fishermen were  forced to hold crabs until the processor was in a


position to receive them.  Long delays occurred, crabs were lost


owing  to suffocation  In live tanks, and fishermen lost both time

                                                                   6.11
and revenue.

-------
KODIAK AREA








             Part of the mortality was attributed to inadequate




circulating pumps and tanks loaded beyond crab tolerance for con-




finement.  Another factor was the circulation of sea water which




had been organically polluted from crab wastes discharged from the




canneries during processing.  Oxygen depletion of receiving waters,




largely from the discharge of crab wastes, suffocated live crabs




before they could be processed.  The Alaska Department of Fish and




Game monitored dissolved oxygen in waters at and adjacent to the




canneries.  During the period 3/24/66 through 1/30/67 they recorded




oxygen levels showing a high degree of depression from normal expected




ranges.  For instance, on August 23, 1966, only 2.3 ppm oxygen was




noted in the small boat harbor.




         6.  Streams and Rivers




             Only one watercourse of consequence is located within




the Kodiak Area.  Buskin River flows about 6 miles from Buskin Lake




to tidewater.  The system is entirely within the U.S. Naval Reser-




vation.  The lake serves the Navy base as a source of primary water




supply.




             The river and lake supports a large run of pink, coho




and chum salmon.  Dolly Varden char are present also.  The Buskin




River system, owing to its accessibility  and good fish populations,




receives heavy use from anglers, especially military personnel.




         7.  Vegetation




             Kodiaks1 rather mild maritime climate and heavy rainfall




account for the lush vegetation found on bottom lands and hillsides.




                                                               6.12

-------
KODIAK AREA






Only the highest mountain slopes are barren.  The hillsides support




stands of Sitka spruce, grasses, forbes and shrubs.  In the bottom




land, tall grasses and sedges are intersperced with cottonwood and




willow.




     B.  Present Water Quality Problems




         At the present time, the City of Kodiak has an estimated




population of 7500 persons, with an additional suburban population



of 2000.  Most of the domestic sewage is discharged untreated into




Kodiak Harbor through five outfalls.  One hundred-forty permanent




and one hundred-fifty transient persons reside on boats in the boat




harbor.  All sewage from vessels is discharged into the harbor with-



out treatment.




         During 1965, approximately 50 million pounds of fish wastes




were discharged into Kodiak Harbor.  The largest single contribution




is the King Crab industry, which operates on a year-round basis.




         By local ordinance, fish waste is ground up before discharge.




This method abates the odor problem somewhat, but increases the area




to volume ratio and consequently accelerates biochemical degradation.




The large swarms of seagulls feeding on cannery wastes create a




nuisance problem.



         The effect of this unregulated discharge on the quality of




the waters in Kodiak Harbor is obvious.  Floating solids impair the




appearance of the shoreline and malodorous refuse offends the nose.




There has been a significant reduction in dissolved oxygen in. the




waters fronting Kodiak.




                                                             6.13

-------
KODIAK AREA








         The small boat harbor depends upon tidal action for flushing




waste materials into the receiving waters of Kodiak Harbor.  Tidal




currents average .6 knots and do not afford efficient circulation or




adequate dilution.




         The Naval Station  and Naval Communication Station discharge




domestic sewage directly or indirectly into Woraens Bay and St. Paul




Harbor.  A small amount of this sewage passes through septic tanks.




Numerous outfalls dot the shoreline and these areas are accessible




to children playing in the area, thereby presenting an immediate




health hazard.




         Aside from the obvious effects on the community from floating




solids and odor nuisances, and the potential threat to health, the




effects of this unregulated discharge on the economy and growth




potential of the seafood industry should also be considered*




         Although the area has produced significant amounts of salmon,




halibut, crab, shrimp and others, major seafood production of indus-




trial  importance has only commenced during recent years.  Marine




biologists agree that the waters are virtually untapped when con-




sidering the estimate that one to three billion pounds of  seafood




could  be produced annually from the North Pacific without  fear of




depletion.




         Potential expansion  of the seafood  industry from  these




large  fishing  stocks can multiply the pollution problem unless




immediate  steps  are taken to  solve the waste disposal  problemi
                                                               6.14

-------
KODIAK AREA








VI.  KODIAK BIBLIOGRAPHY




     1.  Report of Essential Economic and Fiscal Facts Concerning




Kodiak Island Borough, Alaska, 1966.




     2.  Comprehensive Plan, Kodiak, Alaska Prepared by Alaska State




Housing Authority, 1962.




     3.  Feasibility Study for Treatment of Sewage at U.S. Naval




Station, Kodiak, Alaska, by Livingstone, Moore and Wallace, Inc.




     4.  U.S. Weather Bureau, Climatic Summary of the United States,




Number 86-43.




     5.  Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Dissolved Oxygen and




Salinity, Selected Stations, Kodiak Harbor, unpublished data.
                                                               6.15

-------
SITKA BOROUGH AREA
                                   7.1

-------
                                                                                                                                               ALASKA
                                                                                                                                   ALASKA, HAP C
SURVEY. FEDERAL  CENTER. DENVER. COLORADO OR WASHINGTON 25. D. C

-------
                          SITKA BOROUGH AREA






I.   INTRODUCTION




     The purpose of this summary is to list and evaluate sources and




extent of pollution in the metropolitan area of Sitka, Alaska, and to




recommend actions to solve immediate problems.




     Present polluted conditions are in violation of the Alaska Water




Pollution Control Act and the Administrative Code.  The Alaska State




Department of Health and Welfare requires that at least primary treat-




ment be given to sewage from the City of Sitka and Federal Installa-




tions at Mt. Edgecombe.




     Authority for this report is the Federal Water Pollution Control




Act as amended (33 USC 466).  In addition to the State water quality




requirements, Presidential Executive Order 11288 requires Federal




Installations to provide secondary treatment for all liquid wastes.




     Inasmuch as recommendations presented in the references comply




with these requirements, implementation of these recommendations is




justified.  The Alaska Water Laboratory, however, feels that addi-




tional study of present water quality is required to assess the impor-




tance of chemical pollution by industry in the Sitka area.
                                                                7.3

-------
 PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
II.  SUMMARY OF POLLUTION PROBLEMS AND RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES
Party or Agency
      Remedy
Cost Millions  Relative  Vicinity
 of Dollars    Priority  Map Index
Greater Sitka Borough  Sewers and primary
or City of Sitka       treatment

Federal Installations  Sewers and primary
on Japonski Island     treatment
(Mt. Edgecombe)
                          2.0
                          0.5
Fish processors
Garages, service
stations, boats
and airplanes

Pulp Mill
Sitka Borough
Separation of solids,
disposal of water
into sewers.

Grease traps and dis-
posal of oil outside
sewers.

Removal of additional
wood fiber and dis-
solved solids from
red liquor.  Reduction
of foaming detergent
use and installation of
primary outfall facility.

Providing for disposal
of solid waste, car
bodies, rubbish tin
cans and garbage in a
way that does not damage
the environment and water
quality.
     1.6
     0.2
                  (A)


                  (A)



                  (B)
       scattered
                  (B)    scattered
(B)
(B)     area wide
*  Not estimated
III.  IMMEDIATE CONTROL NEEDS

     The most critical need in Sitka, including the Federal Installations

at Mt. Edgecombe, is to provide a primary treatment facility for domestic

sewage.  The accompanying map shows that only a small area of the borough

of Sitka has public .sewer service.  This area contains approximately 757,

of the contiguous population.

                                                                     7.5

-------
     Facilities have been planned (1) that would provide a jointly

operated facility for the City of Sitka and Mt.  Edgecombe.  An

increase in size of this design would provide for interception of

sewage from all of the presently populated areas along the beaches.

This would remove the health hazard and unsightliness of outfalls

presently along the beaches, many of which are above the water line.

     Alleged chemical pollution of the waters of Silver Bay near

Sitka by a pulp mill requires further study.  Such a study should

determine the long range effects of continued pollution at the pre-

sent level and make recommendations for further treatment if required.

As a minimum, additional screening to recover wood solids and addi-

tional dissolved solids recovery should be accomplished.  In addition,

control of effluent concentration by provision of a holding lagoon

should be provided.  Such a lagoon would assure that accidental loss

of chemicals within the pulping operation does not cause the effluent

to reach concentrations beyond that recommended by the Alaska Water

Pollution Board (2) as a result of their survey prior to plant con-

struction.  Recommendations of AWFCB regarding outfall design and

location should also be complied with as soon as possible.

IV.  COSTS

     The cost of providing a sewage system including additional lines,

pumping stations, and a primary treatment plant would be $2.5 million.

This estimate is based on an existing plan (1) which embraces all of

the Japonski Island*- installations and the present central city in one

system.  Cost of such a system was estimated by the same report to be
^Japonski Island is the locale of many Federal Installations including
 FAA, Coast Guard, Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Mt. Edgecombe USPHS
 Hospital.  The complex is sometimes called "Mt. Edgecombe".
                                                                 7.6

-------
$0.87 million.  Extrapolation of this design to include a larger area




brings the total to $2.5 million.  It should be pointed out that 75%




of the population of Sitka, including the Federal Installation, would




be served by the $0.87 million system.  The remaining population,




which is strung out along the two roads, would be served at an addi-




tional cost of over $1.5 million.




     Cost of Sewage Pollution Abatement




     City of Sitka and Japonski Island                $0.87 million




    (Japonski Island alone                             0.5  million)




     Remaining contiguous Borough (excepting city)     1.5  million




     Integrated System Total                          $2.5  million




     The cost of additional treatment of wastewaters discharged by




the pulp mill is believed to be near $1.6 millions.  Of this amount,




approximately $0.75 million is required to increase the capacity to




recover dissolved solids.  Additional treatment of the effluents




discharged into the receiving waters would be primarily to recover




added chemicals and wood fiber.  The resultant saving is not included




in the cost estimates.




     Additional screening and centrifuging waste waters to increase




recovery would cost an estimated $0.38 million.  An additional out-




fall facility, designed to comply with earlier recommendations by




the Alaska Water Pollution Control Board (2), is estimated to cost




approximately $500,000.



     Therefore, total cost of immediate needs is approximately $1.6




million.  This would essentially bring waste control and treatment




into compliance with existing recommendations of the Alaska Water




Pollution Control Board.





                                                             7.7

-------
V.  RECENT PROGRESS IN POLLUTION CONTROL



     The pulp mill operated by Alaska Lumber and Pulp Company has



continued a program of water quality study in Silver Bay and is pro-



ceeding with plans for new controls on waste recovery processes.




Their attention is directed toward increasing recovery of processing



chemicals and wood fibers, which would result in lower operating



costs.  They have already achieved significant improvement in waste




recovery from the barker and wood room operations and are planning




the addition of more screens to recover pulp from wash waters in



parts of the pulping process.  However, they do not have any plans



for additional attention to the dispersion of effluents in the



receiving waters nor for a storage lagoon.



     The City of Sitka has recently extended several outfalls into



the channel below low water.  This, in addition to the building of



new sewers (presently under construction) T/ithin the city, has mater-



ially improved sewage disposal within the city.  An immediate result




of the construction of new lines has been the removal of three of



the four sewers that formerly discharged into a recreational lake



within town.  This lake can be used for boating and fishing when the



remaining sewer has been extended past the lake.




VI.  BACKGROUND FOR RECOMMENDATIONS



     A.  The Borough



         Sitka and its environs contain much of the historical



interest of southeastern Alaska (3).  The city is prized as an




attractive place in which to live, with a flourishing educational



system, cultural attractions, beautiful scenery, and numerous parks



and waterfront recreation areas nearby.  The surrounding area within





                                                                7.8

-------
a few miles consists of a region of beaches and forest under the
management of Tongass National Forest.
         Principal sources of income are the fishing industry, pulp
mill, institutional and military establishment, and tourist industry.
A major tourist attraction is fishing for salmon in local waters,
digging of shellfish, and picnicking on the beaches.
     B.  Population
         Population in 1965 is given at 4950 including medium and low
density areas connected by road to Sitka proper.  Annual growth rate
for the next decade is projected to be between 3.5 percent and 4.0
percent.  There are an additional 1500 persons on Japonski Island
which consists entirely of Federal Installations, principally Mt.
Edgecombe, the U.S. Public Health Service Hospital.
     C.  Environment
         The climate of Sitka is sub-polar maritime, with narrow
temperature ranges, generally between 32° and 55° F.  Precipitation
occurs on 200 days of the year, mostly as light rain.
         Geologically, Sitka is on a low shelf between a submerged
glaciated valley and precipitous glaciated peaks.  Permeable soil
covering the rocky basement is shallow and contributes to diffi-
culties in sewer system construction and operation, as well as to
problems in building and road construction.
         Vegetation is dense and luxuriant.  Predominant species
are conifers which provide a mainstay of the area's industry.
Undergrowth consists of thick layers of sphagnum moss and low shrubs
from xtfhich is derived the muskeg nature of the soil.
         Nearby waters are oceanic and have a  salinity between 30
and  33  parts per  thousand at depth; however, salinity of surface
                                                                7.9

-------
      may decrease to as low as 10 parts during seasons of high runoff.




Currents in the boat harbors and along nearby beaches are of consider-




able strength owing to the 7 foot tidal ranges, and are to be considered




in sewage-outfall design.  Local winds vary from generally offshore




in winter to onshore during spring and summer.  As a result, periods



exist when surface currents tend to cause accumulations from sewage




outfalls \7herever such outfalls lie to the southwest and are close




to shore.




VII.  PRESENT WATER QUALITY PROBLEMS




     Present pollution problems are demonstrated by the appearance




of floating sewage in the boat harbor, numerous sewer outfalls along




the beaches, and the appearance of raw sewage above ground levels




in some areas of town.  Some of the many sewer outfalls in nearby




waters are such that onshore currents deposit sewage solids on




beaches.




     A bond issue was recently rejected that would have provided for




sewers in a part of town which is plagued by inadequate drainage for




septic tank systems.  At present there is no plan to provide primary



treatment facilities for the municipal sewer system.  Lack of ade-




quate sewers and no treatment plant cause pollution of nearby beaches.




These beaches could provide recreation for the local population and




be used by summer visitors from other states as well were it not for



the presence of obnoxious debris and water.




     Pollution of nearby waters by the pulp mill requires that addi-




tional study be carried out and that recommendations made by Alaska




Water Pollution Control Board be implemented.  Allegations are that




the biological community of the marine environment has been altered






                                                            7.10

-------
by chemical pollution due to sulfite waste liquor.   It is apparent




that the use of hard detergents in one of the mill  processes causes




a persistent foam to appear on the water and beaches at times,




depending on weather conditions.




     A recent (1965) report by the FWPCA (4) shows  that chemical



alteration of the water has occurred.  This report  also shows that




under certain climatic conditions, such as with westerly winds which




occur during summer months, waste liquor concentrations may achieve




levels that are toxic to many species in the marine food chain.  Con-




centrations of waste sulfite liquor may also be high because of




unusual operating conditions in the mill or maintenance problems




with recovery equipment.  Long periods of time are required by the




biological community to recover from short periods of exposure to




lethal levels of toxic wastes in the waters.



     Recent data collected by Alaska Water Laboratory presents evi-




dence of changes in the biota of beaches near the pulp mill (5).




Local residents frequently mention other biological changes, alleg-




edly caused by pollution.  Foremost among these are complete dis-




appearance of spawning herring runs in Silver Bay and reduction in




numbers of certain molluscs.  A decrease in the growth rate of




edible clams is also indicated.




     Recommendations by the Alaska Water Pollution Control Board  (2),




subsequent to a site survey in 1957 before the pulp mill went into




operation, were not followed with regard to outfall location and




design, nor was a storage  lagoon provided.  Evidence  suggests that,




bad  treatment facilities and waste disposal recommendations been




followed, pollution would  now be under better control.





                                                              7.11

-------
     Organic Sedimentation

     Road building and land clearing around Sitka has resulted in

deposition of muskeg silt in the bottom of some waterways.   This

results in a biological oxygen demand but the total extent of damage

is not known.  Deposition of the material, like a fine, flocculent

peat moss, on beaches has been noted.

VIII.  BIBLIOGRAPHY

     1.  An Engineering Study of Sewage Disposal Needs for Federal
Installations at Mt. Edgecombe, Alaska, 1965, by Phillio Engineering
Service and Cornell, Rowland, Hayes, and Merryfield, Engineers and
Planners.

     2.  Edward F. Eldridge and Robert 0. Sylvester, "Silver Bay
Water Pollution Control Studies Near Sitka, Alaska", Alaska Water
Pollution Control Board, Seattle, Washington, June 17, 1957.

     3.  Greater Sitka Borough Comprehensive Development Plan, 1966,
Prepared by the Alaska State Housing Authority, E. N. Courtney, Acting
Executive Director.

     4.  Northwest Region, FWPCA, "Oceanographic and Related Water
Quality Studies in Southeastern Alaska", August, 1963, Portland,
Oregon, July, 1966.

     5.  Unpublished Reports by Alaska Water Laboratory.
                                                            7.12

-------
ALASKA-WIDE SEAFOOD PROCESSING WASTES
                                                 8.1

-------
                                           "V.
                      LOCATIONS OF  SEAFOOD  PROCESSORS  \N ALASKA
   WESTERN
No. of Operators	44
Approx. Ibs. of Waste— 76,000,000
           CENTRAL
No. of Operators	104
Approx. ibs. of Waste — 100,000,000
                                                                      SOUTHEASTERN
                                                                 No. of Operators	87
                                                                 Approx. Ibs. of Waste—55,000,000

-------
               ALASKA-WIDE SEAFOOD PROCESSING V7ASTES


I.  INTRODUCTION

     The purpose of this report is to draw attention to the vast

amount of seafood wastes entering Alaskan waters, (see figure 1),

point out present and developing pollution problems and make recom-

mendations for action to abate these problems.  The data used in

this report are taken from Alaska Department of Fish and Game

Statistical Leaflets Number 10 and 11.  Further information on

seafood waste utilization was obtained from other publications,

(see bibliography).  No detailed surveys or engineering studies

were carried out for the preparation of this report.

     The authority for this study is the Federal Water Pollution

Control Act,  as ammended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq.).

     Nearly all of Alaska's coastal waters still retain the pristine

characteristics which are so desireable for the uses they support.

In some isolated cases water quality has deteriorated due to poor

management.  Other areas are developing potential problems.  It is

toward the elimination of these present and potential problems that

this study is directed.

II.  SUMMARY OF IMMEDIATE POLLUTION CONTROL NEEDS

     (Priority indicated by number in parenthesis).

Waste Treatment                                               Relative
	jArea	Responsibility             Need              Priority

Statewide        Seafood Processors  Primary treatment of        (A)
                                     sanitary sewage and
                                     chlorination of
                                     effluent.

Statewide        Seafood Processors  Collection and adequate     (B)
                                     treatment of seafood
                                     processing waste.
                                                                   8.3

-------
     Institutional Practices Required;

     1.  The State of Alaska is proceeding to adopt standards as

required by the Federal TJater Pollution Control Act for Alaskan

waters.  These standards should clearly recognize Alaska's position

as a major producer of commercial seafoods, and an area with great

recreational potential.

     2.  The State of Alaska ought to consider legislation to provide

for State participation in grants for the construction of sewage

treatment works,, where necessary.

     3.  Provisions should be made to expand the staff of the

Alaska State Department of Health and Welfare to facilitate sur-

veillance of the seafood processing industry.

     Research;

     1.  Research by the seafood processing industry and the Bureau

of Commercial Fisheries and the FT'JPCA to provide effective and eco-

nomical ways of removing processing wastes and, if possible, means

for their efficient utilization in the form of some fishery by-

products of economic value.

III.  PROBLEM AREAS AND IMMEDIATE NEEDS

     During the last year for which statistics are available (1965),

a total of 235 seafood processors were operating in Alaskan x^aters.

     The Southeastern region (see figure 1) contained 87 operators and

produced approximately 55 million pounds of seafood waste.  One

hundred-four operators were active in the central region where

approximately 100 million pounds of seafood waste were produced.

Forty-four operators were active in the western region where 76

million pounds of waste were produced.

     The total seafood waste from Alaskan waters was approximately

281 million pounds (140,500 tons).  About 50% of this waste was
                                                                8.4

-------
produced during the peak of the salmon canning season (mid - June

to mid - September).  Shrimp and crab waste is generally produced

throughout the year.

     Figure 1 shows the distributions of the various seafood pro-

cessors.  It is apparent that there is a wide diversity in the lo-

cations of many of the operators, but also there are several sites

where a number of operators are located (Kodiak,(22), Wrangell .(16)

and Ketchikan (4).  These areas constitute the major actual and

emminent problem areas within the state.  Kodiak harbor has already

experienced a severe degradation of water quality within the harbor

due to waste discharge from the seafood industries.

     Extremely high water quality is required by the uses that

characterize the waters of Alaska.  Production of anadromous fish,

shellfish propagation, and recreational and aesthetic opportunities

are curtailed, made more costly or eliminated by the existance

of pollution by the seafood processing industry.  In addition,

present waste disposal practices create unfavorable conditions

for the industry itself and could disrupt normal operations, particu-

larly where several processors utilize the same receiving waters

for waste discharge.  The following actions are necessary in order

to protect the use and quality of Alaskan Coastal waters.

     1.  Sanitary Waste Disposal Systems

         Almost without exception, seafood processing facilities

operating in Alaska lack adequate sanitary sewage facilities.

Due to  the variations in processing sites and numbers of employees

 (6-150), the impact of each processor on the receiving waters  should

be determined.  State and Federal water quality standards should

determine the degree  of treatment required.
                                                               8.5

-------
     2.  Solid Waste Disposal from Seafood Processors




         Because of the number of sites used in seafood processing



spread over a variety of geographic and climatic regions, there is,




at present, no single method which could effectively be used for the



recovery and disposal of seafood wastes.  Each processing site should



be examined to determine the degree of treatment necessary, the



need for solids removal, and the possibilities for utilizing the



waste materials.



IV.  COST OF IMMEDIATE POLLUTION ABATEMENT



     At the present time, raw domestic sewage is being discharged



directly into the receiving waters from virtually all of the seafood



processors.  In order to meet the minimum requirements of the water



quality standards of the State of Alaska, some form of treatment will



be necessary.  Since the number of employees at the various processors



ranges from 6-150, it seems that the most practical method for treat-



ment of domestic wastes would be a small package treatment plant.




These package plants would vary in size  to accomodate the number of




employees at each of the processing plants.  If approximately 857,



of the processors needed such facilities and an average $25,000 was



expended per package plant, about $5,000,000 would need to be invested



in treatment facilities for domestic wastes.



     In addition to domestic sewage, it will also be necessary to



remove processing wastes in some problem areas.  Although there



have been numerous attempts to develop methods of utilizing fish



wastes in Alaska, none have proven successful to date.  At the



present, there is a Norwegian package plant available which has



a production capacity of 50 tons per day.  Considering that it



takes  about five parts of wet waste to produce one part of the



finished product, such a plant could utilize all of  the waste from
                                                                      8.6

-------
a problem area.  There are three large problem areas where such




a package plant could be utilized.  The package costs approximately




$1,000,000.  Besides  the three major areas of concentration there




are several smaller areas that would also need attention.




     Since there are no methods suitable for these smaller areas




they will need to develop a means of transporting their wastes into




an area that can assimilate the wastes without a degradation in




water quality.




     Considering the three large package plants plus a means for




transporting the wastes from the smaller processors, it is estimated




that an expenditure of $5,000,000 will be necessary to properly




handle the fish processing wastes.




V.  RECENT PROGRESS IN POLLUTION CONTROL




     Preliminary results of research in progress at the Ketchikan




Technological Laboratory of the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries,




indicate the technical feasibility of utilizing wastes from both




fish and shellfish to produce a fish protein concentrate suitable




for use in animal feeding.




     Data has been accumulated regarding process efficiencies,




construction and operation costs, feeding experiments and market




potential.  Work is also progressing in the development of package




plants suitable for the seasonal operations which are characteristic




of much of the industry in Alaskan waters.




VI.  BACKGROUND




     A.  Pertinent Coastal Characteristics




         The Alaska Coast line associated with this study drains




an area of approximately 500,000 square miles.  So irregular is its




boundary that if superimposed upon the lower 48 it would stretch




from the Florida coast to California and from Michigan to Mexico.
                                                                    8.7

-------
Its nearly 32,000 miles of coast line exceeds the world's circum-

ference.

     The Pacific Mountain System defines the southern border of

Alaska rising from the Gulf of Alaska and the Northern Pacific

Ocean.  The system continues in an arc across the top of the Gulf

of Alaska sending off two spurs as its axis rotates west and south-

ward.  The coastal spur contains the St. Elias Range and the Chugach

and Kenai Mountains where it dips into the sea to reappear as Kodiak

Island at its southwestern tip.  The main spur forms the cresent of

the Alaska Peninsula and Aleutian Islands chain.  Between these

spurs lie the inland waterways of Southeast Alaska, the Wrangell

Mountains, the Copper River Plateau, the Talkeetna Mountains, the

Susitna Lowlands and Cook Inlet.  Beyond the mountains lies a broad

expanse of lowlands, plains and rolling highlands.  Its drainage

system - the Yukon, Kuskokwim, Porcupine, Tanana and Koyukuk Rivers -

empties into the Bering Sea.  Jutting out from the northwest corner

of this region is the Seward Peninsula which reaches out toward

Siberia.  To the north lies the Brooks Range.

     The climate of Alaska is a product of several physiographic

features.  The first of these is the general east-west main mountain

system rising abruptly from the sea to heights of 19,000 feet.

Secondly, Alaska is bounded by the Arctic Ocean to the north, the

Bering Sea to the west and the gulf of Alaska and the North Pacific

Ocean on the south.  Its southeastern and southern coasts are

bathed by the Japanese Current.  Finally, Alaska's high northerly

latitude is a basic factor in the determination of its climate.

As a result of these features, precipitation ranges from more than

150 inches per year in the southeast to 5-20 inches in the interior.
                                                              8.8

-------
Temperature gradients are likewise strongly differentiated.  The




southern coastal strip is characterized by cool summers and mild




winters while the interior is subject to great extremes (-60° F.




to +90° P.).




     Four major zones of vegetation can be defined.  The seaward




slopes of the southeast produce dense forests restricted to a narrow




belt reaching to 2500 feet altitude.  Within this belt there are




approximately 16 million acres of forest predominantly hemlock and




sitka spruce.  The interior forest zone contains an estimated 125




million acres limited to the better drained valley floors.  The




predominant species are black and white spruce, birch, aspen and




poplar.  The grassland zone, approximately 100 million acres, covers




the lower Alaska Peninsula and the Aleution Islands.  Finally,




100 million acres of treeless Arctic slope and coastal lands con-




stitute the tundra zone.  In each of these zones there is an un-




measured amount of barren surface, muskeg and ice.




     The total population of Alaska is approximately 265,000.




Seventy percent of this population live in the coastal area.




Population centers include Anchorage (102,000), Fairbanks (45,000),




Juneau (12,400), Ketchikan  (11,500), Wrangle-Petersburg (5000),




Sitka (8225), Kodiak (9000), Bethel (7240), Nome (6613) and




Kotzebue (4000).  Of these only Fairbanks lies in the interior.




To further delineate, approximately 132,000 people live along the




central (see figure 1) coast, 39,000 along the southeastern coast




and 17,000 along the western coast.  It is rather unique that these




population centers are not a product of Alaska's present economy




but rather a result of her past economy.






                                                                 8.9

-------
     The present economy of the coast is dependent upon commercial
fishing, petroleum, timber and tourism.  Unfortunately these in-
dustries do not always find complete compatability.  Domestic sewage,
wastes  from wood products manufacturing and spillage from petroleum
operations tend to reduce the water quality.  It is rather paradoxi-
cal that fishing, the leading industry, cannot tolerate such a
reduction in water quality nor can tourism tolerate a reduction
in the  esthetic quality of the area.
     B.  Present Water Quality Problems
         1.  Domestic Pollution
             At the present time domestic sewage from the seafood
processing plants is being discharged directly into the coastal
waters.  The number of employees at the various plants range from
6 to 150.  Although the dilution available is practically infinite,
Alaska's water quality standards do not allow the discharge of solids
into receiving streams.
         2.  Wastes From Seafood Processing Plants
             Heads,  shells,  vicera etc. from processing plants are
discharged directly into the receiving waters.  In most instances
these wastes are dispersed by tides and wind and removed by scavengers
or decomposed without causing a pollutional problem.  However,  in
some congested areas in restricted bays this refuse has become a
problem.  At present such areas are solving their problems by barging
the waste into the open sea or by grinding the wastes before discharg-
ing them into the receiving waters.
         3.  Low Dissolved Oxygen
             Kodiak:  In the past dissolved oxygen concentrations
within  the vicinity of the 22 processing plants near Kodiak has
                                                                  8.10

-------
been reduced to the extent that the water could not be used in

crab holding tanks.  This condition did not exist during the 1966

season probably due to a poor crabbing season.  However, it is

a problem that will reappear when fishing returns to normal.

             Approved practices which will either remove the wastes

from the water completely or deliver them to areas in the sea that

can assimilate them adequately will need to be initiated before

the full potential of the coastal area can be realized.

VII.  BIBLIOGRAPHY

     1.  Alaska Catch and Production, Commercial Fisheries Statistics,
1964.  Stata of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game, Statistics
leaflet No. 10.

     2.  Alaska Catch and Production, Commercial Fisheries Statistics,
1965.  State of Alaska, Department of Fish and Game, Statistics
leaflet No, 11.

     3.  Utilization of Alaska Salmon Cannery Waste as  a Source  of
Feed for Hatchery Fish, Landgraf, R.G., D.T. Miyauchi,  and M.E.
Stansby.  Commercial Fisheries Rev. Volume 13 No. lla,  Nov. 1951,
pp 26-33.

     4.  New Foods from Salmon Cannery Wastes., Anderson, L. and
F. Piskur, Pacific Fisherman, April 1944, 2 pp.

     5.  Salmon Cannery Waste for Mink Feed, Leekley, JR etal,
Fishery Leaflets 405, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Nov. 1952,
31 pp.

     6.  Utilization of Alaskan Salmon Cannery Waste, Parts 1 and
2, Stansby, M.E. et. al.  Special Scientific Reports, Fisheries
109. Sept. 1953, 107 pp.

     7.  Alaska, Review of Business and Economic Conditions University
of Alaska, Institute of Business, Economic and Government  Research,
January 1966, 8 pp.
                                                                  8.11

-------
STATEWIDE FOREST AND MINING INDUSTRIES
                                                   9.1

-------
                STATEWIDE FOREST AND MINING INDUSTRIES

I.  INTRODUCTION

     The purpose of this summary is to describe and evaluate water

pollution caused by mining and timber harvesting in the State of Alaska.

Of necessity, the description will be in broad terms, and generalities

will be resorted to in evaluating the seriousness of the pollution

problem and courses of action to prevent or reduce pollution.

     Recommendations presented here are based on studies done in Alaska

(McNeil and Ahnell, 1964; Bishop, 1967) and in other parts of the

United States (Dunford and Weitzman, 1955; Irvin, 1967; Eschner and

Larmoyeux, 1963; Calhoun and Seeley, 1963; and Albert and Spector,1955).

All the cited works dealt with the effects of logging, chiefly silta-

tion, on aquatic life.  However, similar results arise during placer

mining and also have an adverse effect on aquatic life.

     Although pollution caused by mining and timber operations in

Alaska now is minor, planned future expansion of these industries will

pose serious problems unless methods of prevention are developed and

enforced in anticipation of actual pollution.  Public Law 84-660

entitled Federal Water Pollution Control Act clearly stipulates that

any activity that is deleterious to stream use shall constitute pollu-

tion.  Moreover, proposed standards for Water Pollution Control in the

State of Alaska state that sediment that adversely affects fish life

or interferes with water treatment is considered pollution.  A state-

ment in Alaska's Statutes, Section 46.05.230, presently excludes sil-

tation caused by placer mining and gravel washing as pollution.  This

statement must be removed if Alaska's Water Quality Standards are to

comply with  the Water Quality Act of 1965.  Background of this state-

ment is that many Alaskan streams are naturally  silt laden.  How-

ever, the natural  silt apparently does not preclude anodromous and
                                                                    9.2

-------
                                                                          OWNER

                                                                       Bureau of Land
                                                                       Management

                                                                       State of Alaska and
                                                                       State Selected


                                                                       U.S. Forest Service
                                         ugac
                                       tional Forest
Figure 1 - Commercial forests in Alaska (Haring and Massie, 1966).

-------
other fish use of these streams, whereas man-made silt apparently

does so.  Further studies in this problem area, including possible

synergistic effects, are desirable.

     Since recommendations presented in the references cited earlier

meet these requirements, executing these recommendations is justified.

However, the Alaska Water Laboratory feels that research must be

continued, or initiated where needed, to provide answers to problems

of pollution associated with the mining and timber industry through-

out the State of Alaska.

II.  SUMMARY OF MAJOR POLLUTION PROBLEMS, COSTS OF ABATEMENT, AND
     RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES

     At present, pollution arising from mining and logging is minimal

simply because both these industries are operating far below their

ultimate capability based on the extent of the total resource.  Logging

of any magnitude is carried on only in Southeastern Alaska and is

supplying logs for pulp mills at Ketchikan and Sitka; the only other

activities are small assorted sawmills scattered throughout the State

(Rogers, 1932, p. 145).  The chief polluting agent associated with

logging is siltation which damages spawning and nursery gravels.

Active mining consists of one underground mine and several minor

strip or placer operations (Rogers, 1962, p.  145) although the

Division of Mines and Minerals lists 182 active (including prospec-

ting) mines and four coal stripping operations.  Siltation is the

principal polluting agent associated with mining, especially placers.

Another possible source of pollution from mines is chemical reagents

introduced by ore treatment of lode mining operations.

     Figure 1 gives the general location of forests in Alaska where

commercial timber operations are possible based on the existing

                                                                  9.4

-------
resource.  Nearly all timber resources are owned by government agencies,



either State or Federal.  Although logging in Southeastern Alaska is



progressing, the total cut is far below the allowable cut on a sustained



yield basis (Haring and Massie, 1966).  Table 1 gives the programmed



requirements for timber in Southeastern Alaska and illustrates that



pulp mills are the principal consumers of timber.



     Timber in interior Alaska is scarcely being logged at this time



although several million acres of commercial timber are available.




Table 2 shows the total interior timber resource.



     Pollution control associated with logging consists chiefly in



adhering to good logging methods and proper siting of logging and



skid roads.  Dunford and Weitzman (1955) conclude that total road



mileage can be substantially reduced by careful planning.  Eschner



and Larmoyeux (1963) conclude that careful logging methods greatly



reduced the sediment load of streams draining the logged watershed.



In a survey of logging damage to California streams, Calhoun and



Seeley  (1963) concluded that careful logging could prevent siltation



and that the main incentive was a willingness on the part of operators



to be careful.  It apparently costs no more to log by acceptable



methods and prevent damage than to cause wholesale, irreparable damage



to streams and watersheds.



     Pollution caused by mining is now negligible although it could



be a serious problem in the future because Alaska has extensive



deposits of many minerals.  The extent and location of 21 metallic



and 9 nonmetaliic minerals are discussed in the Rampart  Dam Report



 (1965).  Some of these  are extensive  and many need only  a favorable



economic climate to be  developed with attendant pollution hazards.
                                                                  9.5

-------
                             TABLE 1

      PROGRAMMED ANNUAL TIMBER REQUIREMENTS OF MANUFACTURERS
      IN THE TONGASS NATIONAL FOREST AREA, AS OF 1966-1967,
                 (From Haring and Massie, 1966)
     Company                                   Annual Requirement
                                                (million bd. ft.)
 Ketchikan Pulp Company                                 220
 Alaska Lumber and Pulp Company                         140
*Pacific Northern Timber Company                         70
 Ketchikan Spruce Mills                                  25
 Wrangell Lumber Company                                 20
 Metlakatla Mill                                         20
 Columbia Lumber Company                                 10
 Sitka Sawmill                                           10
*0ther                                                   15
                                                        530
      *  Planned Operations.
 SOURCE:  U.S. Forest Service, Juneau
                                                              9.6

-------
                                                 TABLE 2
                        SUMMARY OF FOREST RESOURCE CHARACTERISTICS IN INTERIOR
                                           ALASKA AS OF 1965
                                    (From Haring and Massie, 1966)

Resource
Characteristic
Ownership of
Forest Land

Commercial
Forest Land
Species
Composition
Commercial
Timber Volume
(bil. bd. ft.)

Estimated
Allowable annual
Cut (mil. b. ft.)

Copper River
Valley
Mainly Federal
B.L.M. , some
State and
private

Approximately
1 mil. acres
Mainly White
Spruce
1

15

Tanana River
Valley
Primarily state
easily accessible
private; Federal -
BLM in non-accessible
places
Valley - 2 mil. acres
Readily accessible -
1 mil. acres
White
Spruce 60%
Hardwood 40%
Valley 7
Readily
accessible 4

Valley 90
Readily
accessible 45

Yukon River
Valley
Federal -
B.L.M.

Unknown, esti-
mated at 10,000
sq. mi. forest
area.
Mainly White
Spruce
Unknown
(estimated
potentialtlO)

Unknown

Kuskokwim
River Valley
Federal -
B.L.M.

100,000 acres
plus adjacent to
river approx.
68,000 acres.
Primarily White
Spruce; some
Birch, Aspen and
Cottonwood
Valley .780
Adjacent
to river . 365

Valley 6%
Adjacent
to river 4

Total
Interior
Alaska*
	

Unknown, but
estimated at
over 3 . 1 mil
acres.
	
Unknown, but
estimated in
excess of
18.78
Unknown, but
estimated in
excess of
111.5

* Based on major river valleys only
     SOURCES:  U.S.  Forest Service, U.S.  Bureau of Land Management and Alaska State Division of Lands.

-------
                      TABLE 3
          PRODUCTION OF MAJOR COMMODITIES
ANNUAL REPORT, DIVISION OF MINES AND MINERALS, 1965
              DOLLAR VALUES (THOUSANDS)

Year
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
1961
1962
1963
1964
1965
Gold
$10,125
8,387
8,420
8,882
8,699
8,725
7,325
7,541
6,525
6,262
5,887
3,998
5,784
3,485
2,045
1,505
Mercury
$ —
	
6
8
277
12
853
1,349
774
851
940
816
712
76
95
104
Coal
$3,033
3,767
5,779
8,452
6,442
5,759
6,374
7,296
6,931
6,869
6,318
5,868
6,409
5,910
5,008
5,878
                                                        9.8

-------
Figure 2 (A), (B), and (C) shows the location of major deposits of




14 metallic and industrial minerals (Cobb, 1960, 1962, and 1964).




     Most damage to streams and associated biota, caused by mining




operations, has already occurred as a result of extensive mining




during the early part of this century.  At present, only a few small




mines are operating; hence, pollution is minimal and confined to small




local areas.  Gravel and coal washing are the largest contributors to




pollution at present and this damage could be prevented by using




settling basins to trap silt before the wash water is discharged to




a stream.  Although Alaska has extensive coal deposits in several




parts of the state, only two fields are presently being mined, the




Nenana and Matanuska fields.




III.  IMMEDIATE CONTROL NEEDS




     Although Alaska has extensive timber and mineral reserves,




neither industry is being operated at potential capacity, chiefly




because of economics associated with each resource.  The principle




timber reserves are the spruce and hemlock forests of southeastern




and central coasts of the state.  Virtually all of this timber is




controlled by the U.S. Forest Service and logging of this timber will




be under their supervision.  With the present area of logging, pollu-




tion is not serious although local siltation of streams does occur.




However, observations by Forest Service biologists (Sheriden and




McNeil, 1967) suggest siltation of spawning beds caused by logging




operations is temporary because this silt is flushed out during  flood




stages of each stream.  These conditions may not always hold and




permanent silting causes destruction of spawning beds as described




by Irwin (1967) and McNeil and Ahnell (1964).  In any event, it  is






                                                                   9.9

-------
                                 .d».         * «?* .  . \
                                 *'     «•        • .. \
                                    0  Gold (placer)


                                    x  Gold (lode)
                                             500 miles



Figure 2 (A) - Known mineral  deposits in Alaska (Cobb,  I960,  1962,  1964)

-------
                                  «  Copper, Lead, Zinc



                                  x  Molybdenum, Tin, Tungsten
                                              500 miles
Figure 2 (B)

-------
                                      Iron
                                      Industrial minerals
                                      Chromium, Cobalt, Nickel, Platinum
                                      Antimony, Bismuth, Mercury
                                                 500 miles
Figure 2 (C)

-------
desirable to reduce silting to a minimum to preserve original spawning




bed conditions.  Properly laid out logging roads and logging by




approved methods can prevent damage to streams by controlling erosion




associated with timber removal.  Approved logging methods are avail-




able; it is only a matter of getting loggers to use these methods




under supervision of the Forest Service.




     A definite figure for the forest resource of interior forests




is nonexistent because these forests have never been inventoried.




Baring and Massie (1966) present estimates that out of 130 million




acres classified as forests in the state, 45 million can be designated




as being commercial forests.  Subtracting a total of 5.7 million acres




of coastal forest from the total leaves 38.8 million acres of commer-




cial forests in interior Alaska, a huge area by any reckoning.  These




forests, consisting chiefly of white spruce, aspen, and birch as




marketable species, are generally confined to lowlands and adjacent




slopes of the Yukon, Xanana, Copper, Kuskokwira, and Susitna valleys.




Present logging of these vast forests is practically zero except for




local use for rough lumber and house logs.  The future of these forests




will depend on developing markets for the "Jood product that can be




furnished, mostly pulp (Haring and Massie, 1966).




     Pollution caused by timber harvesting of interior forests can




be placed at nearly zero because of the nonexistence of large scale




operations.  If large scale logging becomes established, pollution




could still be minimal if proper logging methods are used.  Nearly




all interior forests are controlled by the State or the Bureau of




Land Management; hence, these agencies can exercise close supervision




of any logging operation.  Another factor that would tend to mitigate






                                                                   9.13

-------
siltation Is flat terrain on which most of the commercial forests



grow.  Such Ioi7 relief would prevent erosion because of extremely



low stream gradients.  The absence of intense rainfall and total low



annual precipitation would also reduce siltation from logging opera-



tions.  A possible complicating element might be permafrost.  However,



commercial timber does not grow where the soil is frozen; therefore,



such effects could be neglected except where access roads might cross



permafrost areas.  Proper planning of road systems would prevent



pollution similarly to that described for coastal forests.



     Control needs associated with timber harvesting can be summarized



by stating that pollution now is insignificant, and where it occurs it



can be controlled by using approved logging methods supervised by



whomever controls the forest.  Expanding present operations to include



interior Alaskan forests is dependent on developing markets and economic



conditions.  Research on effects of logging should be continued in



coastal forests and initiated for interior forests to collect data



with which to establish guidelines to permit economical harvesting of



timber resources without damage to the resource base.



     Although insecticides such as DDT have been shown to be dele-



terious to aquatic life (Reed, 1965), future pollution from this



agent will be minimal.  All governmental agencies have been instructed



not to use chlorinated hydrocarbons as insecticides on government


      21
lands.    Since nearly all forest lands are in Federal agencies, this



prevents widespread use of persistent insecticides.  Where local con-



trol is required, melathion, a nonpersistent agent, is being substitu-



ted for chlorinated hydrocarbons.



     Mining is considered by many to be an important industry in Alaska.



This may have been true in the past and will probably be true in the




                                                                 9.14

-------
future; however, at present, mining is a very minor economic enterprise




(except for oil).  Table 3 shows how two commodities have declined in




importance during a 15 year period.  Coal production is stable.  In the




past, copper mining in Copper River area was important where $200




million dollars worth of copper was taken out in about 20 years (Rogers,




1962, p. 258).




     Pollution controls to prevent damage from mining operations are




not now urgent because of the low level of raining activity.  Neverthe-




less, serious thought must be given to methods of control to prevent




future damage should mining experience a revival to its former impor-




tance.  Probably the greatest potential source of damage is siltation




from placer, stripping, and gravel washing.  Damage is chiefly to




stream biota as sediment covers gravel beds, choices some streams and




generally interferes with stream ecology.  Settling basins will pre-




vent siltation if such basins can be proven to be economical.  Mining




engineers are of the opinion that sediment controls are unnecessary




and would be uneconomical.  Biologists, on the other hand,  have ample




evidence that placer mining is detrimental to stream life.  Prolonged




high turbidity tends to cause fatigue of gill tissues of adult fish




and excludes light from bottom dwelling organisms (Stroud, 1967).




     Settling basins appear to offer the cheapest preventive measure




for controlling siltation.  Two one-acre basins-in-series can be con-




structed for a cost of $1400, assuming no land clearing.  Maintaining




these basins would average at least one bulldozer hour per day @




$40/hr. to give $4,800 for a 120 day season.  Assuming that 50,000




yd3 of gravels were sluiced, this would cost about $0.12/yd3 of




washed gravel.  Such costs can be mpared to typical costs of placer
                                                                 9.15

-------
gold mining which ranges from $0.13 to $2.54/yd ,  depending on the




size of the operations (Thomas, et al., 1959).  Assuming $0.12/yd^




for pollution prevention, in 1965 it would have cost $114,200 to




prevent siltation for an industry whose annual value was $1,354,000.^2




Using similar reasoning, it would now cost about $2 million to prevent




siltation caused by gravel washing operations.




     It must be made feasible that miners and pollution control agencies




can work together for the mutual welfare.  Research and engineering




studies are needed, both from an economic and conservation point of




view, whereby unemotional solutions to such problems can be obtained.




Cooley (1966) cites studies done by private research institutes who




conclude that recreation and tourism are one of Alaska's most potential




industries.  Filling small streams - that now run clear and provide




recreation - with mining debris will not attract visitors to Alaska.




     Chemical contamination from milling operations associated with




lode mining may increase if mining becomes more important.  For example,




a revaluation of the price of gold as a subsidy paid to U.S. gold mines




would result in a dramatic increase in this source of pollution.  Gen-




erally such activities try to recover any chemical that is used if it




is worthwhile; however, any such milling operation must be monitored




to prevent damage to the streams through accident, negligence, or




irresponsibility.  Milling operations usually produce considerable




silt which must be disposed of in settling basins similar to those




discussed for placer mining.




IV.  BACKGROUND FOR RECOMMENDATIONS




     A. Geography
                                                                  9.16

-------
         Physical characteristics of Alaska - location, physiography,




climate and plant growth - have played a major role in her history and




economic development.  These characteristics will continue to influence




development and challenge ingenuity.  Principal physical features will




be sketched briefly to show their effect on natural resources and




future potentials.




         The total area of Alaska is 586,400 square miles, one-fifth




the size of the Continental United States and is larger than the com-




bined area of the three next largest states - Texas, California, and




Montana.  The boundary of Alaska is such that, if superimposed on the




48 continental states, it would stretch from the Florida coast to




California's and from Minnesota's northern border to Mexico's.  Its




nearly 34,000 miles of coast line exceeds the world's circumference




at the equator and includes more than half of all U.S. continental




shelf.




         The northernmost point of Alaska, like Norway's, is 1,250




miles from the North Pole.  The southernmost point of Alaska's main-




land is the same latitude as northern Ireland.  On the west in the




Bering Strait, Siberia is 56 miles away.  On the east the State borders




Canada for nearly 1,000 miles.




         Five regions are geographically defined as follows (Fig. 3):




         1.  Southeast




             This region consists of the islands and enclosed waters




of the Alexander Archipelago and the adjacent Alaska mainland south




and east of the Malaspina Glacier and the St. Elias Mountains.  It is




mountainous and much of the land area is covered by dense forest.
                                                                 9.17

-------
                       Pt. Borrow
                                                    UNITED STATES
                                              DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                                   ALASKA PHYSICAL FEATURES
                                                             AND
                                                           REGIONS
 ^5 I- —


S1BERIA-
---' t t ~%-
                             KSp
                             P/%^P^:^^\^%^                 &V>^
                             ^M:^^^^^i^^^^^  ^^    Vi'A
                             Jv<5-/ .»• ^J-L/o/l  °'C/a^.    h5-7/A. \ K. S\\->. V^ --^' DDnriOLI^oVI      '   r
                               OUTHCENTRAL
 •s.
  BERING  SEA
 ^
*".
Dutch Horbot
    Figure 3

-------
          2.   Southcentral




              This  region combines Copper River basin, Susitna River




basin, Cook  Inlet  drainage  and its  tributaries, the Alaska Peninsula



drainage  into Shelikof Strait, and  Kodiak Island and adjacent islands.




          3.   Southwest




              This  region embraces the remainder of the Alaska Penin-




sula, Bristol  Bay  drainage, Kuskokwim River Basin, lower Yukon River




basin (south  of latitude 64° North), Aleutian Islands and islands of




the Bering Sea south of latitude 62° North.




         4.   Interior



             This  region embraces the upper Yukon River basin north




of latitude 64° North, Tanana River basin, Koyukuk River basin and



that portion of the Arctic Slope east of Kupavak River basin.  This



last item does not belong naturally or logically in a region labeled




as "Interior," but reflects boundaries drawn by the State Constitution




for purposes of political representation, used by the U.S. Bureau of



Census,  and most executive agencies of the State government.




         5.  Northwest



             This region embraces Seward Peninsula, Kotzebue Sound




drainage, Arctic Slope west of and including Kupavak River basin, and



islands  of the Bering Sea north of latitude  62° North and Bering Strait.




     B.   Physiography



         Alaska's topography is marked by two great mountain systems,




as shown on Figure 3.  The Brooks Range runs east and west above the



Arctic Circle, and the Pacific Mountain System sweeps in a great arc




through the southern part.
                                                                 9.19

-------
          The Pacific Mountain System defines  the southern border of




 Alaska,  rising from the Gulf of Alaska and the North Pacific  Ocean.




 It  is  a  continuation of the continental system which swings northward




 through  coastal  British Columbia into Alaska  as the  Alexander Archi-




 pelago and  Coast Range  of  southeastern Alaska.   The  system continues




 in  an  arc across the top of the Gulf of Alaska,  sending off two  spurs




 as  its axis rotates  west and southward.   The  coastal spur contains  the




 St.  Elias Range  and  Chugach and Kenai Mountains.   It reappears from




 the  sea  as  Kodiak Island as its southwestern  tip.  The main spur moves




 inland to form the crescent of  the Alaska Range and  the backbone of




 the  Alaska  Peninsula and Aleutian Islands  chain.   Between these  two




 spurs  lie the  inland waterways  of Southeast Alaska,  Wrangell  Mountains,




 Copper River Plateau, Talkeetna Mountains, Susitna Lowlands,  and Cook




 Inlet.



          Beyond  these mountain  barriers  lies  interior Alaska, a  broad




 expanse of  lowlands,  plains, and gently  rolling highlands.  It enters




 Alaska from Yukon  Territory  and  slopes  in  a southwesterly direction




 with its  drainage  system -  the Yukon, Kuskokwim, Porcupine, Tanana,




 and Koyukuk Rivers -  into the Bering  Sea.  Jutting out from the  north-




west corner of this  region,  but not actually a part  of it, is the




 Seward Peninsula which reaches out toward  Siberia.   To the north of




 this region lies Brooks Range, a series of rugged highlands forming




 the northwestern extension of the Rocky Mountain system of the con-




 tinent.  Finally across  the  top of Alaska  lie the foothills and coastal




plains of the Arctic Slope.




     C.  Climate
                                                               9.20

-------
          Several dominant physiographic features influence the climate




 of Alaska.  First is the general east-west trend of the main mountain




 systems (becoming southeast-northwest in the Panhandle region).  The



 coast range mountains rise abruptly from the sea to heights of 6,000



 to 19,000 feet, and behind them is the second major arc of the Alaska



 Range of similarly high peaks culminating in 20,300-foot Mt.  McKinley.




 The Brooks Range constitutes the northern border of the Interior region.




 Secondly,  Alaska is a large peninsula bounded by the Arctic Ocean on




 the north,  the Bering Sea on the west, and the Gulf of Alaska and North



 Pacific Ocean on the south.   Its southeastern and southern coasts are




 bathed by  the Japan (or Kamchatka)  Current.   Prevailing winds are south-



 erly (southeasterly in the winter and southwesterly in the summer).



 Finally, Alaska's  high northerly latitude  is  a basic factor in the



 determination of climate,  three-fourths being in the North Temperate



 Zone and the  remainder  in  the Arctic.




         Moisture-laden, southerly  winds, warmed by the  Japan Current,




 strike the  first barrier of  the  Pacific mountain system  and deposit




 moisture on seaward  slopes.   This wringing-out  process is  repeated as



 the  somewhat  drier  and  cooler air crosses the Alaska Range, and again




 when it reaches  the  Brooks Range.   Therefore, moisture drawn  from the



 Pacific Ocean  is distributed  over the major regions  of Alaska in  sharply



 contrasting amounts.  The coastal area of the Pacific mountain system



 is characterized by  extremely heavy annual precipitation,  ranging from




 60 inches to 150 inches in the extreme southeast section and  consider-




 ably over 100  inches in the  southcentral section.  However, precipita-



 tion decreases rapidly a short distance inland from the coast.  The city



of Anchorage,  just inside the Coast Range, has an average annual
                                                                9.21

-------
 precipitation of 14 inches,  while in the Interior region the range is




 from about 5 to 20 inches and on the Arctic Slope generally less  than




 5 inches.



          Temperature gradients are likewise strongly  differentiated by



 the  interaction of sea influence and mountain barriers.   The southern




 coastal strip is characterized by comparatively  cool  summers (mean




 average temperatures ranging in the mid-50"'s F.)  and mild  winters




 (mean average temperatures in the 30°'s  F.).   Despite its extreme




 northern  situation,  the Arctic Slope climate  is moderated by the Arctic




 Ocean, its  average  summer temperatures ranging from the mid-thirties




 to the low fifties,  and winter temperatures ranging from  three to  six-




 teen  degrees  below  zero.  It  is  in the Interior region, particularly




 in the upper  Yukon  basin, that  the greatest extremes  and  most severe




winters occur.   The  greater part  of the  region is  isolated  from the




moderating  influence of the ocean by the Brooks Range on  the north and




 the Alaska  and Coast Ranges to  the  south.   The mean temperatures in




winter generally hover from seventeen to forty degrees below zero and




 in summer rise into  the upper  sixties.  Extreme low temperatures of




78 degrees  below zero and high  temperatures in excess of  100 have been




recorded at Tanana and at Fort Yukon.  Toward  the Bering  Sea, tempera-




tures moderate.



         A  comparison of the average number of days a year with minimum




temperatures of  zero or lower indicates the relative severity of weather.




This ranges from 2 days at Ketchikan and Sitka in the Southeastern




region, to  132 days a year at Fort Yukon in the upper Yukon basin, and



170 days at Point Barrow in the Arctic Slope.  The growing season ranges




from 165 days at Ketchikan to only  17 days at Point Barrow.   The season
                                                                  9.22

-------
 over  the largest  land area (the Interior  region)  ranges  from 54  to  SO




 days.   The extreme northern latitudes  of  most  of  Alaska  produce  a



 correspondingly marked difference  between the  length  of  summer and



 winter  days.   At  Fairbanks,  north  of the  Alaska Range, the  sun rises




 at  9:58 A.M.  and  sets at  1:40  P.M.  on  December 21 and rises  at 12:57




 A.M.  and sets at  11:48 P.M.  on June 21.   At Point Barrow the sun is



 not seen at all from  late November until  late  January and there  is



 continuous daylight from  early May until  early August.




      D.   Vegetation



          Vegetative cover is a direct  product  of  topography,  climate,



 growing season, and day length.  Four  major zones can be defined on



 the basis  of  the  predominant cover type.   The  seaward slopes  of  the




 Coast and  Chugach ranges,  with a generally moderate temperature  and



 heavy rainfall, is covered by  a dense  forest restricted  to a narrow



 belt  from  one  to  five miles wide (except where  penetration extends



 inland  along  river drainages),  and  extends to  about 2,500 feet above




 sea level.  Within this belt are approximately  16 million acres  of



 forest  land,  the  northern and  western  extensions  of the  dense coastal



 forests of the  Pacific Northwest.   Predominant  species are western



 hemlock and Sitka spruce.  The  Interior forest  zone,  containing  an



 estimated  125 million acres of  forest, is  limited to  the better  drained



 valley  floors,  benches, rolling ground of  the  lowlands and the lower



 slopes of  the ranges enclosing  this region.  These are extensions of



 the boreal forests which  border the Arctic tundra.  Predominant  species



 are black  and white spruce, Alaskan white birch,  tamarack, aspen, cotton-



wood and balsam poplar.   Stands are broken and  scattered and  growth is



 generally  slow  except «n  favored -<3lte».  The principal grassland zone,
                                                                   9.23

-------
 approximately 100 million acres, covers the lower Alaska Peninsula and




 the Aleutian Islands; other important grasslands of more limited extent



 also being found elsewhere.  Finally, 100 million acres of the treeless




 Arctic Slope and coastal lands of the Interior region constitute the




 tundra zone, an area covered by sedges, mosses, lichens, small brush,



 and willows a few inches high, most underlain by permafrost.



          Each of these major vegetative zones contains an unmeasured




 amount of barren surface, muskeg, and ice.  Limited areas of land are



 suitable for tilling and other agricultural pursuits, but generally




 top soil is very shallow (averaging less than one inch over extensive




 areas) and humus decomposition is slow.   Permafrost occurs from six to



 forty inches below the surface over much of the Interior.




      E.   Population



          Alaska now has  a total population of about 250,000 with two




 centers  of concentration, Anchorage with 110,000 and Fairbanks with



 about  40,000 persons.  A total  of about  50,000 live in several smaller



 cities in southeastern Alaska,  Juneau, Sitka,  Petersburg,  Haines,




 Skagway,  Wrangell,  and Ketchikan.   Population forecasts  for 1980,




 based  on several  assumptions such as increased electric  power  avail-



 ability  and  continued  oil expansion, indicate  a population of  about




 452,000  (Rampart  Dam Report, 1965).   The greatest growth is predicted



 to  be  in the Anchorage and Fairbanks areas, as  a result  of  petroleum




 activities in the former  and mining  and services in  the  latter.




     F.   Industry



         Forest utilization will continue  to be  centered in coastal




regions where merchantable timber is accessable and abundant.  Pulp




mills will consume most of the cut and the total annual cut will






                                                                  9.24

-------
 increase if a proposed pulp mill  is  built  on Admiralty  Island.




          Timber industry of the interior is  not  expected  to  become




 important vithin the  next 15 years  (Rogers,  1962,  p.  234).   Absence




 of  a  suitable market  for the products  available  is the  chief deterent




 to  developing a forest products industry to  harvest interior forests.




 As  long  as similar wood products  are available elsewhere  at  competi-




 tive  prices,  the transportation problem will continue to  forestall




 development of a timber industry  in  interior Alaska within ten years.




          Although mining as  an  industry is undergoing a depression in




 Alaska,  the future may see  a revival of mining activity.  Alaska has




 many  ore  deposits and  new.intensive  exploration will  probably identify




 new mineralized  areas  and add to  known ores.  Of the  known minerals,




 the most  favorable future is  for  copper, iron, and coal (Cooley, 1966,




 p.  15).   New technology,  sources  of  power, and demand are all that are




 needed to stimulate the extraction of  these  minerals.  A serious block




 to progress  in mining  in the  state is  the lack of  sufficient knowledge




 of  the geology.   Intensified  geologic mapping is expected to contri-




 bute many new ore deposits within a  few years.  Long  term prospects




 are favorable  because  the geology of Alaska  is similar  to that in




 northern  Canada where  extensive producing mineral  deposits occur




 (Cooley,  1966, p. 15).




          Gold mining in Alaska has traditionally been thought of as




 an important  industry,  and many millions of  dollars worth of gold have




been produced.  However, under  the present economic conditions, the




 future of  gold mining  appears far from optimistic  (Rogers, 1962, p.




 227).   Many known placer and  lode deposits are unworked because the




price of  gold  is  simply  too  low to pay for mining  the metal.
                                                               9.25

-------
          Reserves of other metallic minerals  are largely unknown and
 the easily found deposits of economic worth have been mined.   An
 exception is iron ore in southeastern Alaska;  here  reserves  are
 sufficient to warrent development  if suitable  markets were available.
          Alaska has vast reserves  of coal  north of  the  Brooks  range  as
 well as  in other areas of the state.   However,  much of  this  fuel is
 low rank,  which combined with remoteness of the deposits, reduces  the
 demand.   As other sources of energy become available in Alaska,  the
 present  demand for coal  will probably decline  unless other uses  for
 coal are developed.   It  is unlikely that coal mining will expand in
 the next 10 years even with a moderate increase in  population.
      G.  Water Uses
         Timber harvesting is  not  a large  consumer  of water, its only
 use of water is for  transporting sawlogs and storage prior to milling.
 Contamination of water by logging  is  chiefly by siltation of streams
 caused by  careless  logging methods.
         Placer mining requires a  dependable source  of  large volumes
 of  water although quality of water is  not  critical.   Where dredging is
 planned, Alaskan gravels  and overburden must be  thawed with circula-
 ting  water.   After  thawing,  silts  and  sands are  removed by hydraulic
 methods  that need large volumes of water and which produce large
 volumes of  sediment.   It  is  during this phase of placer mining that
 the most damage is done to  streams and fisheries.
         Milling  of  lode  deposits  does not require as much water as
 placer mining  nor are  as  large volumes of  silt produced.  Mining engi-
 neers feel  that  silt derived from milling can be economically controlled
because of  the  smaller volume and  better topographic  relationship of
milling sites  compared to placer operations.
                                                                 9.26

-------
          Coal  and gravel washing require  large volumes of water and



 produces large volumes of silt.  High quality is not required.



      H.  Pollution Control Measures



          Pollution caused by logging and mining is primarily siltation



 of streams which may or may not be permanent, depending on the indivi-



 dual stream hydrology.  A second source from mining might be chemicals



 introduced or derived from milling of ores.



          Control of siltation caused by legging can be obtained by using



 approved logging methods that do not add to the overall cost of timber



 removal.  Only two requirements need be met, (1)  the desire to prevent



 damage and (2) properly supervised operations designed to get the job



 done economically with minimum damage.   When Alaska became a state its



 constitution contained a natural resource article  (Article VIII)  that



 states  that policy would be  to  "encourage the settlement  of its land



 and  development of its resources... for maximum use  consistent with the



 public  interests.  The utilization,  development, and  conservation of



 all  natural resources  belonging to  the State,  including land  and  water,



 (was  to be) for the maximum benefit  of its  people....   Whenever occur-



 ring  in their  natural  state,  fish, wildlife,  and waters are reserved



 to the  people  for common use...replenishable  resources  belonging  to



 the State shall be utilized, developed,  and maintained  on  the  sustained



 yield principle, subject to preferences  among beneficial uses."



 (Rogers, 1962,  p. 177-178).  By  this article Alaska retained  its



 right to control the utilization of its  resources for maximum benefit



 of its  people.  Such control can certainly  be extended  to aid in pre-



venting pollution of streams by logging operations.



         Siltation that results from placer mining,  coal and gravel



washing, and similar mining operations can be prevented by providing




                                                                   9.27

-------
  settling basins.   Research or engineering studies might  provide alter-

  nate  methods  to prevent  siltation.   In the past, little  attention was

  given to the  effects  of  mining on ecology and widespread damage was

  done.  Although miners are reluctant  to  accept controls  over  their

  operations  to prevent pollution, the  article quoted earlier provides

  the state with  a tool for  enforcement.   The state retains permanent

 mineral  rights  of  all land  that is sold  and may retain permanent

 ownership of mineral  lands where removal  of minerals would interfere

 with surface rights (Cooley, 1966, p. 37).  Moreover, the state can

 reject or restrict a mineral lease to insure that the mining operation

 does not interfere with the prime use of certain classified lands that

 includes public recreation and watersheds.

          Through the foregoing provisions of the  State government,

 the State has  the  power  to control  any mining operation that is

 detrimental  to the  public interest.   What is required is  the willing-

 ness on the  part of all parties concerned to recognize that  siltation

 is  detrimental  to long range stream use and that  it  can be prevented

 economically if  operators are desirous of using preventative measures.

 It  is  sheer  shortsightedness  to wreak  permanent damage to stream

 systems for  a  few thousand  dollars worth  of minerals.  Moreover,  it

 becomes ridiculous  to  refuse  preventive measures even  if  they do

 reduce total profits.  Outdoor  recreation is becoming more profitable

 and  this  use of marginal mineral lands may be a better use than min-

 eral extraction.

V.   BIBLIOGRAPHY

     1.  Albert, Frank A., and  Spector, Albert H., 1955,  "A New Song
on Muddy Chafct-ahooche", Water, Yearbook of Agriculture,. U.S.  Department
of Agriculture, pp.  205-210*.


                                                                   9.28

-------
      2.  Annual Report, 1965, State of Alaska, Department of Natural
 Resources, Division of Mines and Minerals.

      3.  Anonymous, 1965, Rampart Dam Project, Alaska.  Field Report,
 U.S. Department of Interior, 998 pp.

      4.  Anonymous, 1966, Federal Water Pollution Control Act, Public
 Law 84*660.  Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, U.S.
 Department of Interior.

      5.  Bishop, Daniel M.,  1967, "Big Creek Administrative Study of
 Cut and Leave Areas",  Interim Report,  1966, U.S.  Forest Service, U.S.
 Department of Agriculture.

      6.  Calhoun, Alex, and  Seeley,  Charles, 1963,  "Logging Damage to
 California Streams in 1962", Inland  Fisheries Administration Report
 #63-2,  Resources Agency of California.

      7.  Cobb,  E. H.,  1960,  "Chromite,  Cobalt, Nickel, and Platinum
 Occurrences in Alaska", Minerals  Investigation Resource Map MR-8,
 U.S.  Geological Survey.

      8.  Cobb,  E. H.,  1960,  "Copper, Lead,  and Zinc Occurrences in
 Alaska",  Minerals Investigation Resource  Map MR-9,  U.S.  Geological
 Survey.

      9.  Cobb,  E.  H.,  1960,  "Molybdenum,  Tin,  and Tungsten Occurrences
 in Alaska", Minerals  Investigation Resource Map MR-10, U.S.  Geological
 Survey.

     10.  Cobb,  E.  H.,  1960,  "Antimony,  Bismuth, and Mercury Occurrences
 in Alaska", Minerals Investigation Resource Map MR-11, U.S.  Geological
 Survey.

     11.   Cobb,  E.  H.,  1962,  "Lode Gold  and  Silver Occurrences  in Alaska",
 Minerals  Investigation Resource Map MR-32,  U.S. Geological  Survey.

     12.   Cobb,  E.  H.,  1964,  "Placer Gold  Occurrences  in  Alaska",  Minerals
 Investigation Resource Map MR-38, U.S.  Geological Survey.

     13.   Cobb,  E.  H.,  1964,  "Iron Occurrences  in  Alaska", Minerals
 Investigation Resource Map MR-40, U.S.  Geological Survey.

     14.   Cobb,  E.  H.,  1964,  "Industrial Minerals  and  Construction
Materials Occurrences  in Alaska", Minerals  Investigation Resource
Map MR-41, U.S. Geological Survey.

    15.  Cooley, Richard A.,  1966, "Alaska  - A Challenge in Conserva-
tion",  University  of Wisconsin Press, 170 pp.

    16.  Dunford,  E. G., and Weitzman,  Sidney, 1955,  "Managing Forests
to Control Soil Erosion", Water, Yearbook of Agriculture, U.S. Depart-
ment of Agriculture, pp. 235-242.
                                                                   9.29

-------
     17.  Eschner, Arthur R., and Larmoyeux, Jack, 1963, "Logging and
 Trout: Four Experimental Forest Practices and Their Effect on Water
 Quality", The Progressive Fish-Culturist, 25:59-67,

     18.  Baring, Robert C., and Massie, Michael R. C., 1966, "A Survey
 of the Alaska Forest Products Industry", Research Monograph No. 8,
 Institute of Socialogy, Economics, and Government Research, University
 of Alaska.

     19.  Irvin, William H., 1967,  :Settleable Solids and Their Effects
 on Aquatic Organisms", Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.
 Presented at Annual Meeting,  American Fisheries Society, Kansas City,
 Missouri, September 12, 1966.

     20.  McNeil, William J.,  and Ahnell, W.  H., 1964,  "Success of Pink
 Salmon Spawning Relative to Size of Spawning Bed Materials", Special
 Scientific Report No.  469,  Fish and Wildlife Service,  U.S.  Department
 of Interior.

     21.  Oral  communication with Leroy Beckwith,  Research Entomologist,
 U.S.  Forest Service, University of Alaska.

     22.  Production figures from:   Malone, K.,  Blasko,  D.  P.,  and
 Holdworth,  P.  R.,  1965.   The Mineral  Industry in Alaska,  Bureau of
 Mines  Yearbook.

     23.  Reed,  Roger J.,  1966,  "Some  Effects of DDT  on the  Ecology of
 Salmon Streams  in  Southeastern Alaska",  Special  Scientific  Report -
 Fisheries No.  542,  Fish  and Wildlife  Service, Bureau of Commercial
 Fisheries,  U.S.  Department  of Interior.

     24.   Rogers, George W., 1962,  "The Future of  Alaska", The John
 Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 311 pp.

    25.   Sheridan, William  L., and McNeil, William J.,  1967, "Sedimen-
 tation of Spawning  Beds and Density of Pink  Salmon in Two Southeastern
 Alaska Streams Before and After Logging", Preprint of 7 years observa-
 tions  by  the authors (1958-64) under  the auspices  of the U.S. Forest
 Service,  Juneau, Alaska.

    26.   Stroud, Richard H., 1967, "Water Quality  Criteria  to Protect
Aquatic Life: A Summary", Special Publication No.  4, American Fish-
eries  Society, pp. 33-37.

    27.  Thomas, Bruce I., Cook, Donald J., Wolff, Ernest,  and Kerns,
William H., 1959, "Placer Mining in Alaska", Information Circular
#7926,  Bureau of Mines, U.S. Department of Interior.
                                                               9.30

-------
OIL INDUSTRY
                                    10.1

-------
                             OIL INDUSTRY






  I.   INTRODUCTION




       The purpose of this report is to examine and evaluate  the  sources



  and extent of pollution attributed to the  developing  industry in




  Alaska and to recommend actions designed to  satisfy immediate




  control needs.



       Oil has  been known to  exist in Alaska for over fifty years



  but  it  wasn't until  1957, when  Richfield Oil  Company  completed  the




  first commercially important oil well on the  Kenai Peninsula, that



  the present era of development  began.  Following  this discovery,



  oil and  gas fields were discovered elsewhere  and now,  after 10



 years  a mature, integrated oil industry is firmly established




 in Alaska.




      Discovery of oil and gas offshore in the Cook Inlet Basin




 prompted erection of permenent drilling and production platforms.



 Presently, six of these huge structures oacupy sites  between Kenai




 an Tyonek.  Two more will be constructed this summer  and prospects



 are  for a total of 15 in the near future.   Should oil  be discovered



 in Cook Inlet  south  of Kalgin Island,  the activity could again



 be doubled.




      The attempt  to  develop  a fail-safe  offshore  oil drilling  program



 in Cook  Inlet  has  taxed the  best minds  in the  oil  industry.  Con-




 ditions,  prevalent in the  Inlet, are unlike any the industry has




 encountered elsewhere.   Tidal currents reaching 8  knots, are driven



 by the second  (up to  30 feet) highest tides in the world.  During




winter ice floes over  two  feet thick form.




     Establishing year-round operations under  these conditions




has been  especially challenging.  Despite all precautions, accidental



                                                                   10.2

-------
 oil spills from broken pipe lines have released large quantities




 of crude oil to the waters of Cook Inlet.   Platform activity has




 reached the point where waste discharges of oily mixtures,  refuse,




 and sewage have collectively become a pollution problem.




      Accidental oil pipeline breaks,  intentional oily discharges




 from well testing and workover,  refuse in the form of mud  sacks,




 plastic visqueen, pallet boards,  and  garbage have caused concern




 to fishermen whose nets became fouled,  reducing fishing time and




 causing fishermen measurable economic loss.   On occasion, plastic




 film tarps wrapped around boat propellers  and terminated what other-




 wise might have been a successful  fishing  trip.




      Wildlife personnel are concerned that offshore  drilling operations




 will generate oily wastes,  sufficient in quantity to disable and




 kill waterfowl  and destroy productive clam beds.   To date, no report




 of loss  has  been made;  however, the possibility  can  be readily




 envisioned.




      Oil  company representatives are  sensitive to oil  spill  complaints




which charge  negligence but  lack supporting proof.   The industry is




 aware that potential hazards exist and have openly discussed  them




with government  officials.  Future drilling, production, and  trans-




portation operations are certain to include techniques, presently




unknown,  to prevent oil  pollution.




     The recommendations included in  this  summary have been prepared




without benefit of a detailed study.  They are based on information




supplied by the conservation agencies of the State of Alaska, U.S.




Fish and Wildlife Service and informal discussions with participating




oil  companies.




                                                            10.3

-------
  Possible Petroleum
       Provinces
U. S. Dept. of Interior
F. W. C. P. A.
Alaska Water Laboratory
College, Alaska
March, 1967

-------
    IMMEDIATE WATER POLLUTION
           CONTROL NEEDS
  PETROLEUM INDUSTRY - ALASKA
        MAP B COOK INLET

  U.S. Dept. of Interior  FWPCA
        Alaska Water Lab	   Ccfuga
                                   River
N.W. Region  1967   College,  AK.


                                 Tyonekfjf
                                    "^

                                  Granite
Moquawkis
 Nicolai
  Creek
           \*   •-• ••") /\.    * •    ^V
        ^ ^wtaT5*J/J /   N  \
           V McArthur   '•&* \
                  Ground
                   Shoal
                      /
                   Nik ickka.
                                                                        Oil fields
                                                                           fields
                  Oil fields
         Field
   Number  of  Wells
  Suanson River

  Middle Ground  Shoal

  Granite Point

 .Trading Bay

  McArthur River
          56

           6

           3

           1

           1
                                                              VICINITY  MAP

-------
 The observed pollution of Cook Inlet by oil,  is in violation of

 the Oil Pollution Act of 1924, as ammended by Public Law 89-551;

 The Refuse Act of 1899,  and the State Water Pollution Control

 Act.

 II.  SUMMARY OF MAJOR POLLUTION PROBLEMS,  COSTS OF ABATEMENT,  AND
       RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES.
 Source of Waste

 Drilling barges
 Cook Inlet
 Immediate Pollution
  Needs Control

 Collection and land
 disposal of oil
 contaminated  leaks,
 spills, dumps, and
 slops.
Drilling Platforms  Collection and  land
Cook  Inlet
Terrestrial
Drilling

Inlet pipeline
failures
Harbor transfer
spills
Tanker
deballasting
Nikishka Terminal
disposal of oil
contaminated leaks,
spills, dumps, and
slops.

Spent or contaminated
mud disposal.

Better equip, design,
leak collection system,
and use of pollution
prevention equipment.

Prevention by use of
better equipment and
by inspection.

Policing only.
Future Pollution
 Needs Control

Slop handling capacity
for oil tankers.
Drift River Termi-  Slop handling capacity
nal                 for oil tankers.

Various crude oil   Oil well brine
handling facilities  separation and
along Cook Inlet     disposal.
shores
Estimated Cost
.  to Correct

$4.5-5,000,000
                         $1.6-2,000,000
$50-100,000


$2-400, 000
Not separable
Not separable
Relative
Priority
$100,000


$200,000


$100,000/Facility
   B
   B
                                             B
                                             B
                                                                  10.6

-------
                     Future Pollution      Estimated Cost  Relative
 Source of Waste       Needs Control         to Correct    Priority

 Standard oil      Design has abatement    Not separable      C
 refinery          provisions built-in.

 Ammonia-Urea      Design has abatement    Not separable      C
 Plant             provisions built-in.

 III.   IMMEDIATE CONTROL NEEDS

      The following steps are recommended to eliminate the present

 oil pollution problem in Alaska,  in order of relative priority:

      A.   Offshore  activities;  gather oily and solid wastes and

 place in a  gondola or other type  slop tank or barge.   Haul to land

 base  - pump inside ring levee  - burn inflammables  and land fill.

      B.   Onshore activities;  control  earthwork to  prevent excessive

 erosion  and stream siltation.  Collect oily wastes  to prevent ground

 and surface water  contamination - burn inflammables  and  land  fill.

      C.   Oil pipelining,  better site  analysis,  preparation, and

 improved  design using  larger safety  factors;  use of  pollution

 prevention  equipment.

      D.   Harbor transfer; better design  and  housekeeping;  accident

 prevention.

      E.   Tanker deballasting; adequate policing.

     Accidents are difficult to prevent;  but  the use of adequate

 equipment,  regular inspection, proper procedure, and necessary

 training would greatly reduce their numbers.

     Many pollution instances are generally attributed to negligence,

 although the facts sometimes suggest deliberate acts.

     One of the best preventive measures  in any phase of the oil

industry is regular surveillance by a state or federal enforcement

agency.  Enforcement in other regions has already proven beneficial

                                                              10.7

-------
 to both the industry and to the public for the reason that many




 thousands of barrels of crude products have,  as result of regular




 inspection,  been prevented from polluting the environment.




 IV.  BACKGROUND FOR RECOMMENDATIONS




      Population




      The present and immediate future population of Alaska will




 have little  effect on the oil industry since  it will not constitute




 a large enough market.




      Industry




      The oil industry in Alaska is very young.   The first pool




 in the Cook  Inlet  has been  in production only since December 1965




 and real pollution control  needs for  the  oil  industry lie in the




 future.   As  can be seen  on  Map A the  area of  the potential petroleum




 provinces  is  larger than that  of Texas.   Oil  and gas  has  already




 been  discovered in northern Alaska.   Within 10  to  15  years Alaska




 could conceivably  be  passing Kansas and Oklahoma and  heading  for




 a  spot among  the top  three  producing  states.




      A.  Drilling  and Production




         This year  the Cook Inlet will have about 8 permanent




 platforms and 14-17 drilling barges.  The Bristol Bay area will




 probably have one drilling  barge.  Drilling activity in the Inlet




 is responsible  for most of  the oil pollution problems.  The entire




 industry is not using all the pollution preventive devices available




 and is not taking all possible preventive measures.  Dumping waste,




drilling muds, products from drill stem testing, and well swabing




 is a major source of oil pollution.  Oilwell workover, when it becomes




necessary,  will be a future possible pollution source.
                                                                   10.8

-------
          At  present  there are only about  four  operators  drilling

 on  land.   One  British Petroleum official  said,  "There's  going  to

 be  a  lot  of  oil  to be found  in Alaska  and a  lot of  it will be  found

 on  the North Slope."

          On  some of  the  remote land based drilling  sites the spent

 drilling  mud and oil  production,  if any,  is  dumped  with  abandon and

 drains into  rivers and streams,  ruining their  pristine qualities.

 Oil well  brine disposal  has,  as  yet, created no problem  because

 it  is pumped back into the ground  at a horizon  where it  will not

 effect near  surface aquifers.

          One extreme  hazard  in drilling,  testing, and production

 is  the ever  present possibility  of an oil  well  blowout.   A blowout

 occurs when  a high pressure  reservoir is  punctured  by a  drilling

 string which is  not surrounded by  sufficient drilling mud to hold

 back the  reservoir pressure.   Once the high  pressure fluid starts

 flowing out  of the hole,  it  is almost uncontrollable.  A blowout

 on  an offshore drilling  rig  could  conceivably cover the  water  surface

 with several hundred  thousand  barrels of  oil.   Blowout preventers are

 standard  equipment and make  the possibility  of  a blowout  remote.  No

 one conscious of  the  risks would allow it.   However, the  industry

 provides  examples where  blowouts have occurred  even after thousands

 of dollars of blowout prevention equipment were properly  installed

 and trained workers stood by the controls.

     B.    Exploration

          Explosives used  in  seismic operations  and exploration

operations themselves, are well regulated by the State.   However,

 in the past, dirt  and other debris has been dozed into the State's

waters.    This practice is prohibited.
                                                          10.9

-------
     C.  Pipelines



         Keeping a crude oil pipeline intact within the Cook Inlet




is one of the most difficult jobs in the world.  The reasons for this




are:  (1) a boulder dotted bottom,  (2) second highest tides in the




world, (3) extreme tidal currents and ice flow up to 8 knots, and




(4) depressions on the inlet floor.  The risk of failure is so great




that some companies prefer to build new shipping facilities on the




west side of the Inlet rather than cross it and use existing terminals.




         A leak has already occurred on the first pipeline in the




Inlet.  This leak was not detected immediately because the pressure




loss x*as not sufficient to operate the automatic shutoff.  Twenty-




five to thirty barrels of crude were lost before the leak was detected




and another 100 barrels were purposely lost (to the Inlet) in locating




the leak.




     D.  Harbor Transfer




         Several times in the past, oil pollution of Alaska's harbors




has been caused by accidental spills during transfer between ship




and shore.  Most of these spills were caused by negligence and




not by defective equipment.  Several thousand gallons of oil pro-




ducts have been discharged into Alaska's harbor waters because of




failure to close a cleanout valve.




     E.  Tanker Deballasting




         Information from the Kenai pipeline people indicated that




tanker deballasting was not a major source of pollution since only




cleaned tanks were used to hold ballast water.  The cleaning water




(slops) is treated and discharged at the Nikishka terminal.  The




recent development of special burners to use water contaminated




oil along with bunker C may eliminate the future need of slop treat-




ing facilities at crude oil terminals.                       10.10

-------
 V.   RECENT PROGRESS IN POLLUTION CONTROL




      Oil Companies




      Most of the recent oil  pollution has  been  caused by  accidents




 where gross amounts of oil have  run  onto surface waters.  Resulting




 pollution from this source far   outweighs  that  from any other cause.




 It  is more difficult to control  accidents  than  simple leaks or




 spills.




      As  a result of the complaints from  the Fisheries people,




 most  of  the responsible oil  companies  are  reportedly making every




 reasonable effort to prevent pollution.  When possible they are




 barging  all their wastes ashore  for  disposal.




      Facilities  are now set-up at the  terminals of  the Cook Inlet




 pipelines  to handle brines from  the  crude  oil when  it becomes




 necessary.




      State  Agencies




      Through conservation of natural resources,  the  Petroleum




 Division of the  Department of Natural Resources prohibits loss of




 oil without notification.  The Department of Health  and Welfare




 has direct  responsibility for the enforcement of the State statutes




 but it lacks funds  for  any effective surveillance-enforcement




 program.  The Fish  and Game Department acts in an advisory capacity




 only.




     Federal Agencies




     The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is concerned with  pollution




 only to the extent that it affects navigation.   The main associated




 function here is to issue navigation permits.   They also have the




responsibility of enforcing the  Refuse Act. of  1899.  The  U.S.




Fish and Wildlife Service is  allowed by law to  comment on  the




                                                              10.11

-------
 navigation permits where Fish and Wildlife migh.t be adversely effected.

 The U.S. Coast Guard has responsibility for enforcing the Oil Pollution

 Act of  1961 which deals with international waters only.  The Federal

 Water Pollution Control Administration has direct responsibility

 for enforcing the Oil Pollution Act of 1924 and will act under the

 Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1965.

 VI.  PETROCHEMICAL INDUSTRY'S WASTE WATERS

      Waste water  from the following sectors of the hydrocarbon

 industry is being,  or will be,  discharged into the Cook Inlet,  or

 is being pumped back into the ground:

                                        Plant            Average Waste
      Source                            Size              Water Flow MGD

 Collier  Carbon NH3-Urea Plant (1968)    1,500T/D NH3          0.014

 Standard Oil Refinery                   20,000  BPD            0.21

 Swanson  R., well brines                 30,000  BPD            0.19

 Ballast  tank cleaning H20       less than 1 tanker/day   less  than 0.01

     Although  Alaska has numerous streams that could be  effected

 by the oil  industry, we will  consider only the Cook Inlet because

 this is  where  the immediate oil problem exists.  Cook Inlet  is  the

 largest  inlet  in Alaska and most of the trade  in Alaska  passes  through

 it.  Its surface at its upper end is fresh water, fed from silt

 laden glacial  streams,  which changes to salt water at its entrance

 to  the southwest.  It probably carries more silt seaward than does

 the Mississippi River.

     Some Alaskans think the Inlet has a low net flow and acts more

 like a stagnant basin than a drainage area.  Oceanographic data is

 lacking and measures to get such information should be started

because of the potential seriousness of future contamination.

                                                               10.12

-------
The  potential  exists  because there  are at least three large natural

gas  fields  in  the  Cook Inlet Area plus the known oil pools which

 underlie the area.

VI.  BIBLIOGRAPHY

     1.  Corps of  Engineers,  U.S. Army, "Oil  and Refuse  Pollution,
Navigable Water of the U.S.,  Alaska",  1955.

     2.  State of  Alaska, Department of Natural Resources,  Division
of Uines and Minerals, Report for the  Year, 1965.

     3.  The Oil and Gas Journal, "Alaska Oil", August 22,  1966.

     4.  Collier Carbon and Chemical Corp., Water and Disposal
Facilities;  Effluent summary  sheet No. 1549-50; October  28, 1956.
                                                               10.13

-------
REMOTE VILLAGES AND FEDERAL INSTALLATIONS
                                                    11.1

-------
                REMOTE VILLAGES AND FEDERAL INSTALLATIONS






  I.   INTRODUCTION




       The purpose of this summary is to evaluate and focus attention




  on the pollution problems at the native villages and federal in-




  stallations located in remote areas of Alaska,  and to recommend



  actions to abate the pollution.




       The present pollution conditions  at some  of these villages and




  installations  present  serious health hazards to the  population in




  the area,  and  in most  instances  are  in violation of  the Alaska




 Water Pollution  Control Act  and  the  Alaska Administrative Code.




 In addition to the  State requirements,   the Presidential Executive




 Order 11288 requires federal  installations to provide adequate



 treatment for all liquid wastes.




      To exemplify the waste disposal problems in these remote areas,



 the immediate vicinity area of Bethel on the lower Kuskokwim River




 has been singled out for the purpose of the report to help illus-




 trate  the sources of pollution for a "typical remote  area of Alaska."




 The people living along the Lower Kuskokwim are greatly dependent



 on the  river for  their  livelihood.   Fish taken  from the river con-



 stitute  a large part of  their diet  and  provide  most of the food




 for  their dog teams.  Many  of the population obtain a portion of




 their domestic water  supply from  the  river, particularly in  the form



 of ice during the  winter months.  Continued pollution of the  river




 and poor  sewage disposal practices could  retard beneficial use  of




 the river in the future, and definitely will increase  the health




hazard to the people living along its banks.



     No field investigations or engineering studies were carried





                                                                   U.2

-------
                                                                                                                                                                ALASKA.MAP C
11.  S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY. FEDERAL CENTER. DENVER. COLORADO  OR WASH.NGTON 25. D.  C.

-------
                              D NATIVE  VILLAGES
                              O FEDERAL INSTALLATIONS
                              REMOTE AREA INDICATED



                               BY SHADED PORTION
REMOTE  VILLAGES AND  FEDERAL  INSTALLATIONS

-------
 out  for  the  preparation of  this  report.   It was presumed  that com-

 plete engineering design analysis will preclude physical  imple-

 mentation of  the recommendations herein.

 II.  SUMMARY  OF IMMEDIATE CONTROL NEEDS
 Responsibility

 A.  Isolated native
     villages
     Bureau of Indian
     Affairs
 C.   Department of Defense
 D.   Federal  Aviation  and
     other  federal  agencies
    Federal Water Pollution
    Control Administration
 Need

 Feasible and adequate
 primary treatment
 with chlorination

 Remote village schools,
 adequate secondary
 treatment or, preferably,
 utilize the village treat-
 ment facility

 Secondary treatment at
 remote military sites, as
 required under Executive
 Order 11288
 Secondary treatment at
 remote federal installations,
 as required under Executive
 Order 11288

 Development of feasible
 methods  of treating sewage
 waste from remote villages
 and installations
 Relative
 Priority

    (A)
    (A)
    (A)
    (A)
    (A)
    Bethel-Lower Kuskokwim River Area

    1.  Waste Treatment
Responsibility

a.  Town of Bethel
    Native Villages
    (Akiak, Akiachak,
    Kwethluk,  Napaiskak,
    Oscarville and Napakiak)
    Bureau of Indian Affairs
    Schools in above native
    villages
Need

Collection system, primary
treatment and chlorination

Centrally located lavatory
facilities with discharge
to an adequate treatment
unit (sewage lagoon, package
treatment unit, etc.)

Connection to village sewage
treatment facility
Relative
Priority

   (1)


   (1)
   (D
                                                            11.5

-------
  Responsibility                  Need                          Priority

  d.  Existing package sewage     Extension of effluent lines     (2)
      treatment units in          to Bethel's collection system
      Bethel                      or to Kuskokwim River (with
                                  chlorination).

  e.  Salmon processing plants     Solids separation and connec-   (1)
                                  tion to Bethel's collection
                                  system.

       2.   Other Pollution  Control  Practices

  a.   Town  of Bethel              Garbage  collection system        (1)
                                 with  land fill  or  other
                                 adequate solid  waste
                                 disposal

  b.   Native  villages  and         Adequate solid  waste             (1)
      BIA school                  disposal

  c.   Salmon  processing plants    Adequate solid waste disposal    (1)

  III.  IMMEDIATE CONTROL NEEDS

      The following actions are necessary to protect the use and

 quality of  the watersheds affected and to protect the general health

 of the native and white population of the area.

      1.   Remote Native Villages

          Because of the economic  and   climatic  environmental

 problems  associated with these isolated villages,  the usual water

 carriage  system serving individual houses for sewage waste  disposal

 is  not feasible in most villages.   Therefore it  will be necessary

 to  develop adequate waste  treatment facilities utilizing means that

 are relatively simple and  feasible to  construct  and maintain.

 It  will be  the responsibility  of the villages  to provide operators

 for  these  systems  and it will  be the responsibility of  the  state

 and  federal  agencies  concerned with waste disposal  and water pol-

 lution to provide  the necessary training  for these  operators to

maintain the  facilities.

                                                                 11.6

-------
      2.   BIA Schools

          Adequate sewage treatment  facilities  (such as  lagoons,

 package  aeration units,  etc.)   should be  constructed for  each

 school.   Wherever possible  and  feasible,  the BIS. school and  the

 village  should  construct and utilize  the  same  sewage treatment

 facilities.   The maintenance and  operation  field crews  of BIA

 should be fully trained  and oriented  on all the  sewage  treatment

 facilities located on  their area.   Frequent nspection  trips  should

 be made  to the  schools to maintain  the treatment facilities  in

 good  operating  condition.

      3.   Department  of Defense, Federal Aviation Agency,  and
           Other Federal  Inotallations

          Secondary treatment units  should be installed  at these

 remote sites  to comply with the Presidential Executive  Order  11288.

 Where the  effluent from  these units discharge  to the  ground surface,

 it should  be  adequately  chlorinated.

         Field  crews especially oriented and trained  in operating

 and maintaining  sewage treatment facilities from each agency  should

make  frequent inspections of all the agencies' facilities  to  keep

 the units  in  good  operating conditions.

     4.  Federal Water Pollution Control Administration

         The Alaska Water Laboratory,   through  their research  and

development sections, should develop feasible methods of  adequately

 treating the  sewage waste from the isolated native villages and

remote federal  installations in Alaska.  Special emphasis  should

be placed on  the importance of developing treatment methods that

the native economy and environment can support and operate.

         The Alaska Water Laboratory should work closely with the

federal agencies involved to make known their, progress  in developing
                                                                     11.7

-------
 treatment methods and should continue to provide technical assist-




 ance to the agencies on waste disposal problems.




      5.  Bethel - Lower Kuskokwim Area




          a.  Bethel



              Direct water pollution to the river from domestic and




 industrial wastes is relatively small at this time.   Most of the




 waste is currently discharged to the ground surface  in the




 immediate vicinity of Bethel.   High priority should  be given to




 a water carriage collection system for Bethel,  with  a primary treat-




 ment plant discharging chlorinated effluent to  the river.   To serve




 those residences that would be unable to install adequate toilet




 facilities in their homes,  heated  community type lavatory facilities




 should be built along the collection system lines.




          b.   Native Villages




              High priority  should  be given to construction of




 adequate and  feasible sewage disposal  methods for  these villages to




 alleviate  the health hazards associated  with  poor  disposal practices.




 One  recommended method would be  to construct  centrally located




 community  lavatory facilities  for  each village with disposal  to  an




 oxidation  lagoon or  package  treatment  plant.  If feasible,  the




 lagoon  or  package  plant should also  be used by the BIA school




 facility.  As insufficient information is  available on sewage




 treatment  facilities  in these remote areas, research and develop-




mental  data are  needed to obtain design  criteria.




 IV;  COST  OF  IMMEDIATE NEEDS




     With over  100 villages  and some 200 federal installations in




remote  areas of Alaska requiring new or  improved sewage treatment




                                                            11.8

-------
  facilities it is only possible (without making a detailed study)




  to generalize the cost of obtaining adequate treatment.  Because




  of the construction factors that must be considered when working




  in these remote areas (lack of adequate transportation,  lack of




  trained local help,  permafrost and tundra conditions,  and severe




  climatological condition),  a cost factor of 3  to 4  must be used.




  An estimated  minimum of 11.5 million dollars would  be  required  to




  meet  the  immediate control  needs,  broken down  as follows:   Native




  villages  -  3  million;  BIA Schools -  1.1  million  (amount  obtained




  from BIA);  Military  -  4.5 million; other federal agencies  -  2.5




 million.  Of  this total,  the  estimated cost  for  the Bethel area's




 pollution control needs is  2 million dollars.




 V.  RECENT PROGRESS IN POLLUTION CONTROL




      Progress has been slow in abating pollution in the remote




 native villages.  The Public Health Service under its PL-121 pro-




 gram has assisted the villages in constructing  water supply wells,




 sewage disposal pits,  and privies.




      The Bureau of Indian Affairs has recently  installed adequate




 treatment  units in a  few of  their schools.  However,  due to a lack




 of trained operators  and maintenance  control the  units  do not always




 operate  satisfactorily.  The Federal  Aviation Agency and  Department




 of  Defense are currently working on design criteria  for  sewage




 oxidation  lagoons  as  one method of adequate  treatment for  their




 stations.  A few extended aeration  package units  have recently




been installed  and are being evaluated.




     Through the efforts of personnel of  the Alaska Water Labora-




tory, the federal agencies involved have become more pollution con-




trol oriented in their programs.
                                                                   11.9

-------
  VI.  BACKGROUND

       Adequate disposal  of  sewage wastes  from remote  and  isolated
  native villages and federal installations in arctic  regions of
  Alaska has long presented  problems to the engineers  and maintenance
  personnel responsible for  designing and operating these systems.
  Severe winters with temperatures reaching the -40° to -60° F.
  range will freeze sewage when sewer pipes are located close to the
  surface.   Burying the lines below the seasonal frost level offers
  little  protection against freezing,  since the permafrost zone extends
  upward  and meets  the  seasonal  frost  depth in many arctic regions.
  The  soil  temperatures  in the upper  layers of permafrost  are generally
  between 22° and 32° F.
       1.   Native Villages

           The locations of most of the villages create major problems
  in providing feasible and satisfactory methods of  treating sewage
 wastes.  Of approximately 200 native villages in Alaska,  over 100
 are located in the flat marshy arctic and subarctic tundra country
 of  western and northern Alaska.  Hundreds of small, shallow tundra
 lakes perched  on top of permafrost that  may be hundreds of feet
 thick cover the  landscape.   Although  these tundra Eskimo  villages
 are generally  situated  along the  banks of  lakes or meandering
 rivers wt'th water  all around, most villages are without an  ade-

 quate  potable water  supply.  Because of their isolated locations
 in  the tundra,  no road  systems, electrical transmission lines,
 telephone  lines,  etc,,  serve the villages.  All materials for
constructing waste treatment facilities would have  to  be brought
in on the ocean-going cargo ships that land once or twice a- year
(summer only)  at  the area trade centers (Bethel, Nome,  Barrow,
                                                                 11.10

-------
etc.) and then flown by small bush planes  to the individual villages.


     The economic development of the native villages has been slow.


The 1960 information from nine election districts covering native


villages in these remote areas mentioned above showed:  83% of


the homes without a public water system or private well; and 86%


without toilet facilities.   Most of the families still "live off


the land," relying on fishing, hunting and trapping to provide


most of their food and clothing.


     Lack of electricity in the villages has restricted the type


of water and waste facilities constructed.  The toilet facility


for the majority of the Eskimo population in the villages is the

                        o
household "honeybucket".   The usual waste disposal practice in


these villages is to dump the "honeybuckets" into some type of


waste disposal pit.  The accepted method of a few years ago -


dumping the "honeybucket" contents in the river or on the ground


around the house - is,  fortunately, generally being discontinued.


     2.   BIA Schools


         The Bureau of Indian Affairs provides elementary education


to the native children in these remote villages.   The teachers,


generally a husband-wife team, have quarters in or adjacent to the


school building.   These school facilities are located in the villages


and thus are subject to most of the water supply and waste disposal


problems of the natives.  However,  the schools do have their own


power supply and thus are better equipped to overcome some of these


problems.   Most of the school facilities have been provided xvith


deep wells through the permafrost for a water supply.   At some of



                                                           11.11

-------
the schools sewage treatment facilities have been installed to

replace the older honeybucket system.  These consist of septic

tanks, small package plants, lagoons, etc.  However, because of the

severe climatic and environmental factors in these areas, these

facilities need trained maintenance personnel to service the treatment

units.  The teachers,  generally, are not mechanically oriented enough

to keep the units in good serviceable condition.

     3.  Military Sites

         The Department of Defense has installed a network of radar

and missile sites throughout the State of Alaska.  Because of the

nature of these sites they were built at locations important for

military strategy, and little,  if any, priority was given to the

availability of water and adaptability for sewage disposal.  Con-

sequently,  water must be piped or carried great distances to many of

these sites,  often located on top of one of the highest hills in

the area.  In the past,  the problem of disposing sewage waste was

usually met by discharging the effluent from a septic tank over

the side of the hill.   The personnel stationed at these remote

sites are generally on one or two year contracts and are not familiar

with the waste treatment facilities or the problems associated with

operating the units under the adverse conditions of arctic and

subarctic Alaska.

     4.  Other Federal Installations

         There are many other federal agencies that have installations

in the remote areas of Alaska.  The Federal Aviation Agency,  Public

Health Service,  Weather Bureau and Fish and Wildlife Service,

among others,  are actively engaged in field activities in these


areas.
                                                                 11.12

-------
          In general, these agencies face most of the same problems




 concerning sewage waste disposal that were mentioned earlier under




 native villages, BIA and military installations.




      5.  Bethel - Lower Kuskokwim Area




          Bethel, located approximately 100 miles from the mouth




 of the Kuskokwim, is at the head of tidal fluctuations and is the




 terminus for ocean-going vessel transportation.   It is the "hub"




 of western Alaska's trading activity and is the  "modern city" of




 the area,  with dirt streets and cars.   None of the other villages




 have such  modern conveniences;  only an occasional  wooden plank




 sidewalk.   River boat (summer)  and  dog team (winter) are the main




 means of transportation for the natives,  with the  Kuskokx^im  River




 serving as  a highway.   For  the  purpose of this report,  the Lower




 Kuskokwim  area encompasses  the  populated  fifty mile stretch  of  river




 from Akiak  to  Napakiak.   (See figure  1 for  vicinity map.)  Half of




 the 2500 (approximately) people in  this area  live  in Bethel  (popula-




 tion of 1300)  with  some 200 in  Akiak,  225 in  Akiachak, 325 in




 Kwethluk, 50 in  Oscarville, 150 in Napaiskak,  and 200 in Napakiak.3




 The  only white population in the six villages  is generally the BIA




 schoolteachers.




      The community of Bethel is  served by a partially subsidized




 "honeybucket"  collection service which made somexjhat regular house




 collections and hauls to a designated disposal area adjacent to




Brown's Slough and within a mile of Bethel.   It is probable that




 some part of the sewage liquid drains and percolates into Brown's




Slough which flows through Bethel and empties into the Kuskokwim
     Two commercial establishments in Bethel have river outfalls




from primary sedimentation units of questionable performance,
                                                                11.13

-------
/

-------
 The effluent from three small package treatment units In Bethel,
 State Arraory-gymnasium-school complex, Alaska Communication System
 telephone building, and Nicholson's water treatment plant drain to
 the surface muskeg in town.  The Public Health Service Hospital,
 located adjacent to Bethel,  has a primary treatment plant which
 also discharges to the ground surface.  Fish viscera waste are
 dumped directly into the river from two small seasonal salmon
 processing plants.
          The economic structure of the villages is low,  with a
 majority of the families "living off the land".   A survey of 10
 villages,  selected  at random in the greater Bethel area  (100 mile
 radius)  showed  only 2% of the population has permanent employment.
          The climate of this area is considered  severe with the
 winters  cold (down  to -50° F.)  and windy (mean hourly windspeed of
 10.3 tn.p.h.).    The  lakes  and rivers are frozen  for more than half
 the year.   The  summers are cool  and rainy with the temperature
 seldom reaching 70°  F.   Severe premafrost conditions exist  at
 Bethel and five of  the native villages,  (Kwethluk  is located on
 an old river channel  of the Kuskokwim and no  permafrost  exists).
 Permafrost depths up  to 400 feet  have been  encountered in the
 vicinity of Bethel, with depths of 50 to  100  feet  common.
         The Kuskokwim River drains the western  side of  the  high
 Alaska Range and thus  is heavily  laden with glacial  silt.  There
 are no flood control dams  on the  river to slow the rampaging
 Kuskokwim  at spring break-up.  Consequently,  the villages along
 its banks  are flooded  to some extent  almost every year.  Often an
 c •,:.-• re village will be  flooded with several feet of muddy water.
While  these  floods "clean  out" the  garbage and sewage accumulations,
                                                              11.15

-------
 they  also  deposit  layers  of mud  and  debris  in  the villages.

         Based  on  the  above elements of  the area, design, construc-

 tion  and maintenance of public utilities  in Bethel  and  adjacent

 villages become major  problems.

 VII.  BIBLIOGRAPHY

      1.  U.S. Census of Housing, I960.

      2.  From PHS-2500 Forms "Dwelling and  Environment-Sanitation
 Inspection Report", Studies on Housing for  Alaska Natives, U.S.
 Department of Health, Education and Uelfare, 1965.

      3.  1960 Census of the United States.

     4.  1964 Alaska Commercial Fishery Operators, Alaska Department
of Fish and Game Statistical Leaflet No.  8.

     5.  Studies on Housing for Alaska Natives, U.S. Department of
Health, Education and Welfare, 1965.   Original data from BIA, 1963.

     6.  U.S. Weather Bureau publications.
                                                            11.16

-------