RECONNAISSANCE
           ECONOMIC BASE ANALYSIS AND FORECAST
                 GRANDE RONDE RIVER BASIN
                   UNION COUNTY, OREGON
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
                  Public Health Service
        Water Supply and Pollution Control Program
                    Pacific Northwest
                     Portland, Oregon
                       April, 1961

-------
                             Reconnaissance
                  Economic Base Analysis and Forecast
             Grande Ronde River Basin, Union County, Oregon
A.  Purpose and Scope of Survey

        This survey is for the purpose of providing basic data about the

economy of the Grande Ronde River Basin.  This data will be utilized in

the preparation of the water supply and pollution control recommendations

of the U. S. Public Health Service for the Grande Ronde River.  These

recommendations were requested by the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers in

connection with their evaluation of projects in this area.  This survey

is of a reconnaissance nature and is intended only to describe the

general nature of the economy and the major possibilities for change.

Although existing reports and statistics provide the basis for most of

the survey, a number of specific economic growth factors have been

explored on a reconnaissance basis with appropriate agencies having

knowledge of phases of the economy.



B.  Study Area and Study Period

        For the purpose of this survey the study area has been defined

as Union County, Oregon and its major communities.  The study period is

the 50 year period ending in 2010.



C.  Geography of Study Area

        The Grande Ronde River is the principal water course in Union

County.  It is flanked by the Blue Mountains and the WaiIowa Mountains.

The Grande Ronde River Basin in the center of the county occupies about


                                   -1-

-------
360 square miles.  This basin is nearly flat and receives an annual rain-



fall of about 20 inches.  The growing season on the basin floor is about



160 days.



        A more detailed description of the general physical features,



climate, and history of the study area is available in the March 1955



U. S. Bureau of Reclamation Report entitled "Grande Rcada Project, Oregon."








D.  Land and Water Uses



        Union County contains about 1.3 million acres of land.  About 60%



of this is classed as commercial forest land and about 15% is cropland.



The major land cover classifications of the county are described in



Table 1.



        Present uses for water in the county are for municipal and



industrial water supplies, irrigation, recreation, and the conveyance of



treated sewage effluent.  Irrigation use is limited to serving 3,300



acres with a full water supply, and about 8 times this acreage with a



partial supply.  Recreational use of water is considerable in the mountain



areas, but on the floor of the basin is limited to steelhead and trout



fishing.








E.  Existinj^ Economic Base






    1.  Population



            The population of Union County has been relatively stable



    since 1900.  Between 1950 and 1960 the county's population increased



    0.7% compared to Oregon's growth of 15.5% and a national growth of
                                   -2-

-------
    Table 1.  Land Cover for Union County, Oregon
ForPSt land

Cconnercial
  Ponderosa pine                         253,940
  Other                                  524,690
Noncommercial                                           43,390

Nonforest land

Vegetative land (cultivated, grass or brush)           439,560
Koavegetativc land (including barrens and cities)       36,660
Reservoirs                                               1,260

                           Total, all land           1,229,500
Source:  Forest Statistics for Umatilla and Union Counties,
         Oregon, Forest Survey Report  135, Pacific Northwest
         Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service,
         U. S. Department of Agriculture, April 1960.

-------
18.5%.  Half of the county's 1960 population resided in LaGrande and



about a third lived outside the four major communities of the county.



Population trends and distribution for Union County are shown in



Table 2.






2•  Industry, Agriculture, and Employment



        Agriculture and forest products are the major basis for the



county's economic activity.  The distribution of employment for 1950



is shown in Tabla 3.  This Table indicates that agriculture is the



largest employer and lumber and wood products manufacturing is second



among the basic or primary industries.  The large number of workers



in the category of "transportation and utilities" include the Union



Pacific Railroad shops at LaGrande.



        Examination of the statistics of workers "covered" by the



Oregon Employment Security Law indicates that there has been little



change in the employment pattern since 1950.  An exception is that



the Union Pacific shops have been moved from LaGrande.  In addition



there has been a small amount of growth among the various secondary



industries such as trade and services.  From examination of the 1959



Census of Agriculture there is also an indication that there is a



downward trend in agricultural employment.  Unfortunately the detailed



statistics of 1960 Census of Population are not yet available to



confirm these trends.



        The forest products industry of the county is based on the



large forested areas in and adjacent to the county.  As indicated in



Table 1, about 60% of the county's land is classed as commercial
                               -3-

-------
       Table 2.  Population Statistics of Union County, Oregon



                          Number of Persons

               1890    1900    1910    1920    1930    1940    1950    1960

County Total  12,044  16,070  16,191  16,636  17,492  17,399  17,962  18,180

LaGrande       2,583   2,991   4,843   6,913   8,050   7,747   8,635   9,014

Union            604     937   1,483   1,319   1,107   1,398   1,307   1,490

Cove             223     —      433     399     307     321     282     311

Elgin            227     603   1,120   1,043     728     997   1,223   1,315

Remainder of   8,407     —    8,312   6,962   7,300   6,936   6,515   6,050
  County


                  Distribution of Population in 1960

                       LaGrande           49.6%

                       Union               8«2

                       Cove                1.7

                       Elgin               7.2

                       Other              33.3
Source:  Based on population counts by the U. S. Bureau of the Census.

-------
Table 3.  Union County Employment Distribution in 1950


                                      Number of Workers

     All employed                            6,598

     Agriculture                             1,391

     Forestry, Fisheries, Mining                31

     Construction                              401

     Manufacturing                             948

       Food and Kindred             122

       Lumber and Wood Products     699

       Other                        127

     Transportation and Utilities              876

     Trade                                   1,189

       Wholesale                    183

       Retail                     1,006

     Other                                     573
     Source:  1950 Census of Population, U. S. Bureau of the
              Census.

-------
forest: land and about half of this is in Ponderosa pine.  The timber



harvest in 1959 was slightly over 110 million board feet (Scribner



log rule).  Almost three-fourths of this was from private lands.  The



pattern of recent years has been similar to this.  Manufacturing of



forest products is confined to lumber, furniture, and millwork.



        The present agriculture of the county is mainly based on the



production of small grains and seed.  The land use of agricultural



land is described in Table 4.  Of the acreage indicated for cropland



harvested, about half was devoted to small grains in 1959, about one-



third to hay (mainly alfalfa) and significant amounts to seed crops,



peas, and vegetables.  The Bureau of Reclamation has estimated that



the study area includes a total of 150,000 acres of agricultural



lands.  Although the 1959 Census of Agriculture indicates that 27,000



acres were irrigated, only about one-eighth of these were considered



to have an adequate supply.



        The mineral industry of the county is almost entirely confined



to materials for the construction industry.  The 1959 value of mineral



production was $663,000, which is slightly over 1% of the state's



total production of minerals.  The county's mineral products, listed



in order of value, are as follows:  stone, sand and gravel, clays,



gold.



        Employment in transportation and utilities has been reduced



by several hundred persons since 1950 because the Union Pacific



Railroad abolished its shops at LaGrande.  Employment in this category



at the present time is limited to that required to serve the local



area.  The remaining categories, which account for about half the

-------
     Table 4.  Agricultural land use in Union County








                                                   1953



Number of farms                                     873



Average size of farm, acres                         604
Land in farms, acres                            527,355



Cropland harvested, acres                       107,501



Cropland used only for pasture, acres            21,085



Cropland not harvested or pastured, acres        48,662



Cropland summer fallow, cultivated, acres       (35,285)



Woodland pastured, acres                         19,590



Other pasture, acres                            174,324



Irrigated land in farms, acres                   27,073
Source:  1959 Census of Agriculture

-------
    total employment, are also considered to be of a service or secondary



    nature,  Part of this employment, however, is in activities which



    benefit from tourists and the recreational opportunities of the



    adjoining WaiIowa and Blue Mountains*








F.  Potential Growth



        Three principal possibilities for growth are considered Ijkely.



The net result of all three is anticipated to produce only a small increase



in the study area's population during the study period.  This increase is



considered to be of about the same (or slightly greater) order of magnitude



as the area's historical growth trend.



        Agriculture on much of the basin floor is anticipated to gradually



convert to irrigation if satisfactory water supplies are made available*



The Grande Ronde Project, as described in the March 1S55 report of the



U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, proposed to irrigate almost 59,000 acres.



This project was not carried out because of the lack of desire of local



residents to alter their cropping practices.  The land limitation of 160



acres per person was probably also a major contributor to the reluctance



to participate in the project.  Although much of the same sentiment



towards irrigation still exists, it is considered likely that a gradual



shift would take place if a multiple-purpose project would make water



available at a lesser cost than previously proposed.  This shift would



be accelerated if a dry cycle occurred or if price supports for wheat



were less favorable.  A shift to irrigation would bring about a growth



in farm employment due to the more intensive farming practices likely to



occur.  The growth in farm employment would be much greater except that






                                   -5-

-------
it is considered likely to be partially offset by farm mechanization.



Estimates by persons in the county connected with agriculture place the



increase in farm employment at from 50% to 100% on the acreage converted



to irrigacion.  Considering total farm employment, this would be a



growth in the range of 17% to 33% during the study period if irrigation



comparable to the Bureau of Reclamation proposal occurs.  Such an increase



in irrigated acreage is not considered likely to create a significant



growth in the food processing industry of the area.  Although a sugar beet



refinery is a possibility in this regard, it would require a major



conversion to sugar beets by most farm operators in the basin and in



adjacent areas in order to make a minimum sized refinery practical.  A



more likely possibility is the increased production of livestock as part



of the crop from irrigated land.  This activity lends itself to gradual



conversion and is not inconsistent with the capabilities of the existing



operations.  Such an operation might possibly make a local meat packing



operation feasible, but the availability of such facilities in the



Pendleton area will lessen this possibility considerably.



        The forest products industry of the study area is considered



likely to experience a small amount of growth during the study period.



The forest resource is presently being utilized at more than its maximum



long range capability.  Timber on the Federal lands is being harvested at



the sustained yield capacity, while timber on private lands is being



harvested at a rate greater than the sustained yield capacity.  In the



near future some drop in harvest and in employment will occur until the



old cutover lands are again ready for harvest.  In about ten years increased



utilization of currently noncommercial species will also increase the






                                   -6-

-------
hatvest and employment opportunities in the forest.  Manufacturing opera-


tions are not expected to change drastically.  Increased automation might


be offset by increasing the amount of manufacturing done on the raw


materials.  A pulp plant is not considered likely because manufacturing



operations providing the main source of chips are part of the same


company's operations which owns a pulp mill at Wallula, Washington on


the Columbia River.  The Wallula pulp mill, which is within reasonable


transportation distance, is currently being expanded and will be able to


continue to handle the chips from the study area.  A further (and severe)



limiting factor to the location of a pulp mill in the study area is the


difficulty of obtaining an adequate water supply and disposing of industrial



waste.  Although a fiberboard plant is a possibility, it would be in


competition with the pulp mill for most of its raw materials, and is not


considered likely in the near future.


        The third potential for growth in the study area is the increase


in service activities due to such factors as increased tourist and
                                                  \

recreational activities in the surrounding area, growth of the college


at LaGrande, and an increasing ratio of service activities to primary or


basic industry.  These factors, of course, have been in operation in the


past and have helped to offset some of the declines in certain other


parts of the area's economy.






G.  Potential Land and Water Uses



        The changes which can be anticipated in land uses are a matter


of intensity of use rather than change in classification of use.  Although


about the same relative amounts of forest land can be expected to be in




                                   -7-

-------
the various stages of production and harvest, the actual areas will be



rotated according to the production cycle.  It is expected, also, that



there will be a gradual trend toward production from younger forests, the



use c2 species not previously considered to be commercial, and the



Increased use of insecticides and fertilizers on the forest crop.



        The conversion of agricultural land to irrigated land would



bring about a major change in the intensity of land use, as well as in



the type of crops and cultivation practices, and will bring annual



cropping to many areas now summer fallowed in alternate years.  Increased



irrigation would also create a major potential for degrading water quality



through irrigation water return flows.  The elimination of floods through



storage projects would also make possible a greater utilization of the



agricultural land, but would probably result in an overall improvement



of water quality by permitting increased low season flows.



        The construction of water control projects in the area vculd make



several changes in water use likely.  These would include a large increase



in the use of water for irrigation, the availability of water for aug-



menting municipal and industrial water supplies, the creation of reservoirs



with recreation potentials, and the augmentation of low river flows during



critical periods.  The latter would make possible the assimilation of



larger amounts of treated municipal or industrial waste, would possibly



enhance the fishery resource, and might have recreational possibilities



not now developed.
                                    -8-

-------
H.  Conclusions

        The study area's economy is mainly based on forest products and

non-irrigated agriculture, with contributions to the economy from tourists

and recreation in the adjacent areas, and from the College of Education

at LaGrande.  The communities of the area are based on both lumber manu-

facturing activities and providing services for the surrounding areas and

activities.  The population growth of the area has been very stable with

only a 127. increase in the last 50 years.

        The growth of population over the next 50 years is expected to be

similar to the historical growth.  Forest products industries are expected

to experience little overall growth in employment.  Agricultural employment

might increase by 25% (average of range of forecast) if a major conversion

to irrigation is made.  Some Increases  in service activities are likely.

        The major potential change in land use would be the conversion of

agricultural land to irrigation.  This would depend on the development of

water storage projects.  Such a development might have a variety of

influences of importance to water supply and water quality management

considerations.  These would include the following major possibilities:

            Increased irrigation creating more intensive land use
            and irrigation water return flows,

            Augmentation of municipal and industrial water supplies,

            Increased capacity of affected streams for assimilation
            of treated waste,

            Improvement of the fishery resource,

            Increased recreational use of the area's streams both
            on the reservoirs and downstream*
                                   -9-

-------