WASHINGTON OPERATIONS,
MTR-7142
 flir  Pollution flssessment of Trichloroethylene
             B.B. FULLER
           FEBRUARY 1976
                               JIT
              HOT

-------
                                                     MITRE Technical Report


                                                     MTR-7142
     flir  Pollution  Assessment  of  Trichloroethylene
                                B.B. FULLER
                           FEBRUARY  1976
    CONTRACT SPONSOR       Environmental Protection Agency

        CONTRACT NO       68-02-1495

         PROJECT NO       077B

             DEPT       W-54
MITRE
• • .r... ..„,..... .. _                                 This document was prepared for authorized distribution
MCLEAN VIRGINIA 22101                                „ na, not been approwed for publie relea$e

-------
   Department Approval:
MITRE Project ApprowafT

-------
                              ABSTRACT






     Trichloroethylene is an organic solvent primarily used for the




vapor degreasing of metals.  Approximately 200,000 industrial workers




are exposed to this solvent annually.  Although the major physiological




response in humans from acute or chronic exposure to trichloroethylene




is central nervous system depression, damage to liver, kidney and heart




have also been reported.  Since the metabolic fate and toxic effects of




trichloroethylene are similar in many mammalian species to those in




man, the fact that this compound has recently been implicated as a




potent liver carcinogen in mice may be of significance.




     Approximately 60% of the total world production of trichloroethylene




is released to the environment each year.  However, due to its low water




solubility, high vapor pressure and high atmospheric photodegradation




rate, trichloroethylene is not expected to persist in the environment.




Ambient concentrations in the atmosphere of industrialized areas are




only about 16 ppt.  Proper use of local exhaust systems in conjunction




with vapor condensation apparatus and good general ventilation should




be sufficient to maintain levels of trichloroethylene in the workshop




environment well below the recommended 100 ppm and to insure a minimum




release to the ambient atmosphere.
                                   iii

-------
                           ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS








     I gratefully acknowledge the assistance of E. Preston in




calculating the atmospheric diffusion of trichloroethylene downwind




from production facilities.  In addition, I wish' to thank my




colleagues, L. Thomas, R. Ouellette, J. Golden, and B. Baratz, for




their many helpful suggestions and criticisms, and M. Jones,




J. Manning, and R. Johnson of the U.S. Environmental Protection




Agency for their support and assistance during the one month duration



of this project.
                                   iv

-------
                          TABLE.OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES

 I.  SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS                                        1

II.  AIR POLLUTION ASSESSMENT REPORT                                6

     A.  PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES                           6
     B.  EFFECTS                                                   11
         1.  Humans                                                11
         2.  Animals                                               21
         3.  Other Effects                                         31
         4.  Present, On-going Research                            32
     C.  AMBIENT CONCENTRATIONS, POPULATION AT RISK AND
           MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY                                  34
     D.  SOURCES                                                   44
     E.  CONTROL                                                   53
         1.  Substitution of Less Harmful Solvents                 53
         2.  Proper Design of Condensation Apparatus               53
         3.  Process Ventilation Process Location                  53
         4.  Proper Effluent Treatment                             55
         5.  Proper Handling, Maintenance and Disposal
               Procedures                                          55

REFERENCES                                                         57

-------
                           LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Number

        1      Trichloroethylene Production Capacity

        2      Summary of Product Release Information
                                                   Page

                                                    46

                                                    52
Table Number

        I

       II

      III


       IV

        V


       VI


      VII

     VIII

       IX
             LIST OF TABLES

                                                   Page

Physical Properties                                  7

Occurrence of Trichloroethylene in Human Tissue     13

Percent of Workers Exhibiting Each Symptom at
the Given Exposure Level                            17

Toxicological Effects                               27

Occurrence of Trichloroethylene in :he Typical
Concentrations (W/W)                                35

Trichloroethylene Exposures in Swedish
Engineering Workshops                               40

Trichloroethylene Production (in 1970)              45

Trichloroethylene in Foodstuffs                     49

Industrial or End Use Trichloroethylene             51
                                   vi

-------
           AIR POLLUTION ASSESSMENT OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE









I.   SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS




     Trichloroethylene is a noncorrosive, nonflammable liquid with




excellent solvent properties.  The compound is easily oxidized to




products which are both acidic and corrosive.  Oxidation inhibitors




are available which are effective at concentrations of less than one




percent.




     Over 90 percent of all the trichloroethylene produced is used by




industrial metal fabricating plants for vapor degreasing.  The remain-




der is utilized as an extractive solvent in foods and medicines and




as a dry cleaning solvent.  Trichloroethylene was also the solvent used




to extract caffein from coffee, and was  present  to  the extent of 10  to




25 ?pn.  General Foods,  Inc.,  the  largest manufacturer of  decaffeinat-




ed coffee, has recently  replaced trichloroethylene  with  methylene




chloride.




     The major physiological response in humans from acute or chronic




exposure to trichoroethylene is central nervous system depression.




This response may take the form of visual disturbances, mental con-




fusion, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, dizziness, palpitation, and




other symptoms.  These effects have actually been observed in indus-




trial workers exposed to trichloroethylene vapors as well as in ex-




perimental subjects.  Evidence indicates that adverse effects are




noticeable in humans even at the allowable level of 100 ppm. Mild

-------
effects have even been reported at concentrations as low as 5 to

10 ppm.  One-hundred-and-four workers were exposed to this chemical

for over 3 years at levels of about 100 ppm.  Ninety-two percent of

these workers exhibited some of the symptoms described above.  How-

ever, cessation of exposure reversed the effects.  Symptoms subsided

in most of the workers within five months.  Data relating to this type

of effect are, in general, quite conclusive.  Additional effects such

as, damage to liver, kidney, and heart have also been reported.  These

data, in many cases, are clouded by the fact that the subjects were

also heavy consumers of alcohol.  This factor may have contributed to

or aggravated the observed condition.  Therefore, evidence for this

type of damage is inconclusive.  Blindness, loss of hearing and

tactile sense, and death from cardiac arrest ind ventricular fibril-

lation following acute exposure have also been reported.

      The major products of trichloroethylene metabolism are tri-

 chloroethanol and trichloroacetic acid.   Trichloroethanol is much more

 toxic to the heart and nervous system than trichloroethylene.  Thus,

 it is believed that this metabolite is responsible for many of the

 observed toxic effects.  High levels of  trichloroethanol are excreted

 by persons exposed to as little as 70 ppm of trichloroethylene.

      Metabolic fate and toxic effects of trichloroethylene in many
                                                           c
 mammalian species are similar to those in man.   Moderate or re-

 versible liver damage was reported in mice, guinea pigs, and dogs

-------
following inhalation of concentrations 10 to 16 times the acceptable




industrial level (100 ppm).   Inhalation at levels of 2 to 20 ppm led




to inhibition of antibody formation and of neutrophil activity.




Cats exposed to 20 ppm for 60 to 90 minutes for A to 6 months showed




damage to liver, kidneys, spleen, and lymph nodes.  Concentrations




of 7000 to 14000 ppm (70 to 140 times that of industrial exposure)




produce changes in the electroencephalogram in rabbits, in some cases




resembling epileptic seizures.  The applicability of these experi-




mental results to humans is uncertain.  Mice are especially sensi-




tive to hepatotoxic agents and rabbits, to convulsions.




     Trichloroethylene has recently been implicated as a potent




liver carcinogen in mice.  It was administered by gastric intubation




at massive dose levels (900 to 2400 mg/kg), and a maximun of 43.2




percent of the test animals were affected.  This claim for carcino-




genicity is not entirely conclusive. Effects produced in highly




susceptible animals (2.5 percent of the controls spontaneously




developed liver cancer) could not be repeated in rats.  In any event,




dosage levels are equivalent to a human drinking 50 million cups




of decaffeinated coffee each day for a lifetime.




      Inhalation studies  conducted at  the  laboratories of Dow Chemical




Corporation  showed  that  trichloroethylene was not  teratogenic  in mice




or rats at 300 ppm.  No  mutagenesis studies have been reported.




     Trichloroethylene is not expected to accumulate in the environ-




ment because it is slightly soluble in water, possesses a high vapor

-------
pressure, and has a high atmospheric photodegradation rate  (a half-


life of 0.3 days at sea level).  Therefore, it is not felt  to represent


an air pollution hazard.  Ambient concentrations in the atmosphere of


industrialized areas are about 16 parts per trillion; in  rural areas,


they are less than 5 parts per trillion; ambient concentrations  in


water are about 0.6 nanograms/liter (0.1 ppt)


     Ground-level concentration of trichloroethylene in the atmo-


sphere 500 meters downwind of a production plant is estimated to be

                     o
approximately 570 g/m , or 0.106 ppm.  Assuming that symptoms occur


following chronic industrial exposure to 5 ppm and that the average


industrial worker is exposed for 2,000 hours per year, an individual


must remain at this point 24 hours a day for 11.A years in order to


inhale a similar amount.  He must remain there for 228 years in order


to inhale an amount equivalent to that inhaled by an industrial worker


following a 1-year exposure to 100 ppm.


     The most significant population exposed to trichloroethylene is


industrial workers involved in vapor degreasing or dry cleaning oper-


ations.  About 200,000 such workers are exposed each year.  In 1973,


OSHA recommended an ambient level of 100 ppm as the allowable time-


weighted average concentration over an 8-hour workday, with a 300


ppm excursion limit.  Evidence suggests that excursions considerably


above this level may exist.  The general public is exposed to tri-


chloroethylene through inhalation of cleaning fluids and ingestion of


foods, spices, and medicines.  Ingestion exposure is a result of

-------
consuming products whose commercial preparation required an ex-




traction operation with this solvent.  Residue concentrations ranging




from 0.02 to 22  yg/kg have been detected in foodstuffs and concentra-




tions of up to 32 yg/kg have been detected in human tissue.  Tri-




chloroethylene is rapidly absorbed by the lungs following inhalation,




but only slightly eliminated upon exhalation.




     Current measurement technology is adequate to ensure that workers




are not exposed to hazardous levels.  Adsorption onto activated




charcoal represents the easiest and most efficient method of collec-




tion, and gas chromatography is the most specific and sensitive method




for analysis.  Breath analysis of exposed workers is also feasible.




     Trichloroethylene is a synthetic chemical manufactured both




domestically and abroad.  Estimated world annual production in 1973




was approximately one million tons and domestic production in 1974




amounted to about 215,000 tons.  There are five producers of tri-




chloroethylene in the United States and their production plants are




all located in southern Texas and Louisiana.




     About 600,000 tons of trichloroethylene are released to the




atmosphere and 10,000 tons to the ocean each year.  This total re-




lease represents approximately 60 percent of total world production.




     A proper local exhaust system, vapor condensation apparatus, and




general ventilation system should keep levels below 100 ppm. Care




must be taken to clean up spills, check leaks, and repair faulty




equipment.

-------
II.  AIR POLLUTION ASSESSMENT REPORT


     A.  PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES


     Trtchloroethylene, CHC1 = CC12, is at normal temperatures a


clear, colorless, noncorrosive, nonflammable liquid, possessing the


characteristically sweet odor associated with chlorinated hydro-


carbons.  Physical properties are listed in Table I (1, 2, 3).


     Trichloroethylene is unstable in the presence of oxygen.  Degra-


dation is further promoted by elevated temperatures and exposure to


light  (especially ultraviolet irradiation).  It is quite reactive


to OH, but only very slowly oxidized by alkyl peroxy radicals and


ozone  (A).  Over 80 percent of the initial oxidation products (as


indicated below).consist of compound (A), which decomposes to yield


dichloroacetyl chloride, C12CHCOC1 (2).


                 C12C               C12C	0


                       0=0


                  HC                 HC	0

                   I                  I
                  Cl                 Ci
                  (A)                CB)


Compound (B), another initial oxidation product, yields phosgene,


carbon monoxide, and hydrogen chloride upon further decomposition.  In


the presence of anhydrous aluminum chloride, compound (A) rearranges


to yield equal amounts of chloroacetyl chloride and chloral, CC1-CHO.


Compounds (A) and (8) are violently explosive and their sudden decom-


position is promoted by the addition of Impurities, including oxidation

-------
                     TABLE I

               PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    Molecular formula:  C1CH = CC1_

    Physical state:     colorless liquid

    Molecular weight:   131.4

    Melting point, °C:  -87.1

    Boiling point
      760mmHg, °C:       86.7

    Specific gravity

      20°/4°C:

      25°/4°C:
     100°/4°C:

    Vapor density,
      bp, 1 atm
      g/1 (air = 1):

Vapor pressure:
Viscosity,
  liquid:


1):
°C
-20
-10.8
0
10
20
°C
-80
-70
-60
-30
-20
1.464
1.456
1.325

4.54
mmHg
5.4
10.8
20.1
35.2
57.8
CP*
2.95
2.10
1.68
1.02
0.9



°C
30
40
50
60
86.7
°C
0
20
40
60




mmHg
94
146.8
212
305.7
760
CP*
0.7
0.58
0.48
0.42

 *centipoise

-------
               TABLE I (CONCLUDED)
Solubility of trichloroethylene in water,
  g/lOOg H0
25°C:
60°C:
                        0.11
                        0.125
Solubility of water in trichloroethylene
g/100 g trichloroethylene
           0°C:
          25°C:
          60°C:
             0.01
             0.033
             0.080
Percent in "saturated" air (25°C):      10.2
Density of "Saturated" air (air = 1):   1.35
Ignition temperature, °C:
Flash point:


Refractive index (20°C) :
Dielectric constant (liquid) 16°C:
Odor threshold (ppm)
                            463
                            none by
                            standard
                            methods
                            1.478
                            3.42
                           21.4
Conversions:
                  1 ppm - 5.38 mg/m  @25°C
                  1 mg/liter = 186.1 ppm

-------
inhibitors.  In the presence of moisture, dichloroacetyl chloride is




decomposed to dichloroacetic and hydrochloric acids.  The acidic




products of oxidation are highly corrosive.  They react with most




metals with which the liquid may contact.




     A large variety of pure compounds and mixtures are effective




oxidation inhibitors of trichloroethylene.  Normally, these stabi-




lizers are effective at less than one percent by weight.  Some current




stabilizers in use include: acetone, acetylenic compounds, aniline,




borate esters, n-butane, 0-cresol, diisopropylamine, ethyl acetate,




hydrazine derivatives, isobutyl alcohol, lactones, 0-nitrophenol,




pyrazoles, stearates, and SO..  With inhibitor addition, trichloro-




ethylene is stable (to 130°C) in the presence of air, moisture,




light, and common construction metals.  Above 130°C, inhibitors are




ineffective and corrosion of the metals occurs. When heated above




700°C, the vapor decomposes, yielding a mixture of dichloroethylene,




perchloroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, chloroform, and methyl chlo-




ride.  When heated vigorously in the presence of air, trichloro-




ethylene vapor is completely oxidized to carbon dioxide and hydrogen




chloride.  Reaction with ozone yields an explosive ozonide which de-




composes to hydrogen chloride, phosgene, carbon monoxide, and chlorine




peroxide (2).




     Trichloroethylene is not readily hydrolyzed by water.  Under




pressure at 150°C, it reacts with alkaline hydrazides to yield gly-




colic acid, CH2OHCOOH.  Reaction with 90 percent sulfuric acid yields

-------
monochloroacetic acid.  Strong alkalis dehydrochlorinate trichloro-




ethylene, with the production of explosive and flammable chloro-




acetylene (2).
                                 10

-------
     B.  EFFECTS




     1.  Humans.  Trichloroethylene is rapidly absorbed by  the  lungs




upon inhalation.  However, only slight amounts are eliminated upon




subsequent exhalation.  An early indication of the metabolic fate of




absorbed trichloroethylene was revealed in a study by Barrett and




Johnston C5).  In this effort, the steam distillate of urine from




human subjects exposed to trichloroethylene was found to  contain a




metabolite with three chlorines on a single carbon atom.  Further in-




vestigation in dogs led to the conclusion that this metabolite  was




trichloroacetic acid.  This conclusion was confirmed by Powell  in




1942 (6).   A somewhat later study by Butler using dogs (7)  revealed




that the major, product of trichloroethylene metabolism was  trichloro-




ethanol, either free or conjugated with glucuronic acid.  Butler con-




cluded that the metabolism of trichloroethylene involves  an initial




conversion to chloral hydrate with rapid metabolic conversion to




either trichloroethanol or trichloroacetic acid.




     In I960, a detailed quantitative study was performed by Soucek




and Vlachova (8).  They showed that an average of 64 percent (range,




58 to 70 percent) of inhaled trichloroethylene vapor was  retained by




persons exposed to concentrations of up to 150 ppm.*  Within a  few




minutes of exposure, monochloroacetic acid (a minor metabolite), tri-




chloroacetic acid, and trichloroethanol were accumulating in the
^Duration of exposure was not reported.
                                  11

-------
urine.  The excretion of monochloroacetic acid was maximal at the end




of exposure and continued for as long as 168 hours after exposure.




Monochloroacetic acid constituted about four percent of the retained




trichloroethylene.  The excretion of trichloroacetic acid was maximal




24 to 28 hours following exposure and continued for as long as 520




hours. Trichloroacetic acid constituted from 10 to 30 percent of the




retained trichloroethylene.  Finally, excretion of trichloroethanol




was maximal a few hours following exposure and continued for as long




as 216 hours. Trichloroethanol constituted from 32 to 59 percent of




the retained trichloroethy]ene.  The total amount of metabolites ex-




creted amounted to 43 to 100 percent of the absorbed trichloroethylene




and were in the ratio monochloroacetic acid: trichloroacetic acid:




trichloroethanol:: 1:5:12.  Later studies by Bart^.iicek (9) and Ogata




et al. CIO) generally confirmed the results outlined above.  Analyses




of postmortem human tissue revealed the presence of trichloroethylene




in body fat, kidney, liver, and brain, indicating uptake by these tis-




sues.  Concentrations in eight subjects are presented in Table II.




     In 1972, Ikeda et^ a^. (11) indicated that the high percentage of




trichloroethanol excreted by persons exposed to quantities of tri-




chloroethylene in excess of 70 ppm might have serious toxicological
                                                              11



consequences since trichloroethanol is much more neurotoxic* and




cardiotoxic** than trichloroethylene itself.  These results suggest
 *Poisonous or destructive to nerve tissue.

**Having a poisonous or deleterious effect vpon the heart.
                                  12

-------
                              TABLE II

          OCCURRENCE OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE IN HUMAN TISSUE.
               CONCENTRATIONS IN wg/kg (WET TISSUE)
     AGE OF
     SUBJECT

       76
       76

SEX
F

F

F
M
M
M
M
F

TISSUE
Body Fat
Kidney
Liver
Brain
Body Fat
Kidney
Liver
Brain
Body Fat
Liver
Body Fat
Liver
Body Fat
Liver
Body Fat
Liver
Body Fat
Body Fat
TRICHLORO
ETHYLENE
32
< 1
5
1
2
3
2
< 1
1.4
3.2
6.4
3.5
3.4
5.2
14.1
5.8
4.6
4.9
       82


       48


       65


       75


       66

       74
Source:  McConnell, G., Ferguson, D.M., and Pearson, D.R.  "Chlorinated
         Hydrocarbons and the Environment"  Endeavor 34  13-18 (1975).
                                  13

-------
that the standards proposed by the Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (100 ppm allowable time-weighted average concentration

over an 8-hour workday with a 300 ppm limit) may not be adequate.

     Many studies of the effects of chronic occupational exposure to

trichloroethylene have been reported.  In general, a wide spectrum of

complaints were observed.  A study involving 70 young workers  (83

percent less than 30 years old) exposed up to 6 years to variable

concentrations of trichloroethylene reported the following symptoms

(12):  headache (74 percent), dizziness (31 percent), nausea  (43

percent), sleepiness at end of shift (29 percent), fatigue (68 per-

cent), euphoria (31 percent), palpitations (29 percent), disturbances

of vision (21 percent), irritability (56 percent), disturbed sleep

(46 percent), anxiety (27 percent), loss of appetite (50 percent),

excessive sweating (39 percent), and alcohol intolerance (21 percent).

The following additional symptoms were reported in studies by

Andersson (13) and Bardodej and Vyskocil (14):  vertigo, tremors,

vomiting, a feeling and appearance of light-headedness or "drunken-

ness," and slowing of the heartbeat (bradycardia).  Andersson reported

that only 8 of 104 workers who had been exposed to this chemical for

more than 3 years were without symptoms.  However, cessation of

exposure reversed the effects and follow-up studies three to seven

years later showed little residual evidence of trichloroethylene
*A hallucination of movement, a sensation as if the external world
 were revolving around the subject or as if he-himself were revolv-
 ing in space.
                                  14

-------
intoxication.  Some workers reported that symptoms had subsided with-

in five months after termination of exposure.  Effects on skin in-

cluded reddening and dermographism,* skin burns on contact, general-

ized dermatitis resulting from contact with vapor, and possibly

scleroderma** (15, 16, 17).  Stewart and Dodd  CIS) demonstrated that

unless trichloroethylene is trapped against the skin, absorption by

this route is insignificant.

     In one study (.19), an attempt was made to correlate levels of

trichloroacetic acid excreted in the urine of  122 exposed workers

with the results of an independent medical survey.  The correlations

were as follows:  less than 20 mg trichloroacetic acid per liter of

urine, no symptoms; 40 to 75 mg, 50 percent reported abnormal fa-

tigue, increased need for sleep, diffuse gastric symptoms, irrita-

bility, headache, and intolerance of alcohol;  100 mg to 200 mg, most

workers reported some of the above symptoms; greater than 200 mg,

most workers reported symptoms plus an increased absence from work

because of illness; greater than 300 mg, all of the workers exper-

ienced all of the above symptoms.  Andersson (13), in a detailed

study of 104 exposed workers confirmed this report, indicating that

no symptoms appeared when excretion of trichloroacetic acid was less
 *A condition in which scratching the skin with a dull instrument
  provokes a linear, raised, pale streak.
**A systemic disease which may involve the connective tissues of any
  part of the body, including the skin, heart, esophagus, kidney and
  lung.  The skin may be thickened, hard and rigid and pigmented
  patches may occur.
                                  15

-------
than 20 rag/liter of urine, but that most workers reported symptoms


when excretion was greater than 75 mg/liter.


     Frant and Westendorp C20) calculated that a person subjected  to


a sustained exposure of 100 ppm for several days will excrete about


200 mg of trichloroacetic acid/liter of urine.  Fribert el^ al.  (21)
                                                              •\

confirmed this estimate by exposing 3 persons for 7 hours daily  for


one week to 100 to 150 ppm and noting concentrations of 250  to  300 mg


trichloroacetic acid/liter of urine during the latter days of the


study.  Thus, some idea of the levels to which the above workers were


exposed is possible.


     In another study (14), Bardodej and Vyskocil examined 75 workers


exposed to trichloroethylene in dry cleaning and degreasing  operations


for periods of from less than one year to ten or niore years.  In


general, symptoms increased with length of exposure.  These  investi-


gators also attempted to correlate symptoms with levels of exposure.


The results are summarized in Table III.  Cases of chronic over-


exposure resulting in total blindness (22, 23) and in total  loss of


tactile* sense and inability to grasp objects between thumb  and  fore-


finger (16) have been reported.  Physiologic changes observed follow-


ing chronic exposure include Increased levels of leukocyte alkaline


phosphatase and blood acid phosphatase (24).  It is suggested that


these findings might indicate an increased capacity to metabolize
*Pertaining to the touch.
                                  16

-------
                              TABLE III

                   PERCENT OF WORKERS EXHIBITING EACH
                   SYMPTOM AT THE GIVEN EXPOSURE LEVEL

Headache
Intolerance
to alcohol
Disturbance
of sleep
Fatigue
Bradycardia
Elec trocard iogram
Disturbance
30-630 ppm
70
92
83
92
33
16
100-154 ppm
26
63
26
47
40
21
5-10 ppm
67
22
22
61
16
6
Source:   Bardodej,  Z., and Vyskocil, J.   "The problem of trichloro-
         ethylene  in occupational medicine"  Arch. Ind. Health 13,
         581-592,  1956.
                                 17

-------
alcohols; represent a response to changes in blood pH; or might  be

related to glycogen metabolism in the liver.  Exposure to trichloro-

ethylene may either speed or slow the heart rate.  Andersson  (13)

reported abnormal electrocardiograms with disturbance of cardiac

rhythm in 77 out of 104 exposed workers studied.

     To what extent trichloroethylene damages the liver is not clear.

Albahary e£ al. (25) and Talot et^ al. (26) conducted liver function

tests on exposed workers and reported no evidence of liver disorders.

Milby C27) noted normal liver and kidney function in a severely  over-

exposed worker who was excreting 780 mg trichloroacetic acid  per liter

of urine.  On the other hand, Guyotjeannin and Van Steenkiste (28)

reported abnormalities of cephalin flocculation,* total lipids', and

unsaturated fatty acids and an increase in beta and gamma globulins

in 18 regularly exposed workers.

     Laboratory studies on human volunteers have been conducted  in

order to elucidate the effect of exposure to trichloroethylene on

performance in various psychophysiological tests.  Vernon and Fergu-

son  (29) subjected 8 male volunteers to two-hour exposures of 0,

100, 300, and 1000 ppra of trichloroethylene.  Decrements in per-

formance were significant only at 1000 ppm.  In a later study, Stewart
*Cephalin flocculation test  (Hanger's test) is a test for  the pres-
 ence of liver cell disease, based on the flocculation of  a  cephalin-
 cholesterol emulsion by the patient's serum.  Cephalin is a crude
 phospholipid which is used as a clotting agent in blood coagula-
 tion work.
                                  18

-------
et al. (30) exposed 5 subjects to 200 ppm for 7 hours on 5 consecutive

days and reported normal performance on tests.  On the other hand,

Salvini et al. (31) exposed 6 male volunteers to an average concentration

of trichloroethylene of 110 ppm (range 90 to 130 ppm) in two 4-hour

sessions separated by 1.5 hours.  He reported a significant decrement in

performance on tests of memory, perception, and manual dexterity and

concluded that 100 ppm was very close to the average concentration capable

of interfering with psychophysiological efficiency.  These studies would

appear to support those of Ikeda et al. (11), again suggesting that present

occupational exposure levels may be unhealthy.

     Cases of acute exposure with extremely serious and often fatal

consequences have been reported.  Toxic action primarily involves

the central nervous system, with specific paralysis of the trigeminal

nerve,* but the gastrointestinal system, circulatory system, and occa-

sionally the kidneys are affected as well.

     The first report of deaths resulting from acute overexposure in

the United States was presented by Kleinfeld and Tabershaw (32). In

one case, the victim died of apparent hepatorenal** failure after

accidentally drinking trichloroethylene.  The man had, however, been

a heavy drinker, which might have been a contributing factor.  Secchi
 *The fifth cranial nerve.
**Pertaining to the liver and kidneys.
                                  19

-------
 et al.  C33)  reported that no liver damage was observed when pure tri-

 chloroethylene was ingested.  Four other victims were all employed at

 degreasing operations where concentrations of trichloroethlene ap-

 proached 8000 ppm.  All four complained of nausea, drowsiness, dizzi-

 ness, and vomiting and died suddenly within a few hours after leaving

 work.  The cause of death was ventricular fibrillation.*

      In 1963, James (30) reported the case of a man employed as a

 vapor degreaser who had become addicted to trichloroethylene.  He

 exhibited all of the usual symptoms associated with chronic exposure

 but also lost his sense of smell.  He died suddenly of cardiac arrest

 17 hours after his last known exposure.  Autopsy also revealed fatty

 degeneration of the liver.

      Other cases of sudden death occurring within a short time after

 acute exposure to trichloroethylene have been reported (31-33). In

 one case, death was preceded by the usual symptoms and also paralysis

 of the face and neck muscles.  In another case', the cause of death

 was ventricular fibrillation and, in the third case, massive liver

 necrosis** was observed.  Lilis et al. (12) offered a theory that

 changes in epinephrine secretion associated with hypersympathico-

 tonia*** induced by trichloroethylene exposure, particularly when
  *A condition characterized by twitching of the ventricular muscle,
   the impulses traversing the ventricles so rapidly that coordinated
   contractions cannot occur.
 **Death of tissue, usually as individual cells, groups of cells, or in
   small localized areas.
***An increased tone of the sympathetic nervous system.
                                   20

-------
accompanied by physical exertion or stress, might account for the




cases of unexplained or sudden death.




     Other effects resulting from acute exposure to trichloro-




ethylene include loss of taste and trigeminal paralysis (38), com-




plete loss of hearing for tones over 1000 cycles per second  (39),




and temporary paranoid psychosis with distortion of both vertical




and horizontal vision (40).




     No evidence for carcinogenicity of trichloroethylene in humans




has been reported to date.




     2.  Animals.  The metabolic fate of trichloroethylene is




qualitatively the same in many mammalian species as it is in man.




However, in some cases, there are quantitative differences.  Rabbits,




for instance, were shown to excrete 10 times more trichloroethanol




than trichloroacetic acid and about 50 tiroes less trichloroacetic




acid than man (41).  Rats, just as humans, excreted increasing amounts




of trichloroacetic acid, with maximum excretion at 24 hours after




exposure to 640 ppm, 1150 ppm, or 2500 ppm for 4 hours.  They continued




to excrete trichloroacetic acid for up to 144 hours (21).




     Fabre and Truhaut (42) studied tissue homogenates from animals




following exposure to trichloroethylene.  They found trichloro-




ethylene present in all of the tissues examined.  Trichloroacetic acid




was present in greatest concentrations in spleen, suprarenal glands,




reproductive organs, and urine.  In vitro metabolic studies concluded




that the most active conversion of trichloroethylene to its metabo-
                                 21

-------
lites occurred in the spleen, followed by lung, brain, liver, and




kidney.




     Toxic effects following inhalation have been observed in a




variety of species under both chronic (low concentration for long




period of exposure) and acute (high concentration for short period




of exposure) conditions.  The highest levels of exposure with no




observable effects on rats were:  0.3 hours at 20,000 ppm; 0.6 hours




at 12,000 ppm; 1.4 hours at 4800 ppm; and 5 hours at 3000 ppm. The




"no effect" levels for chronic exposure (7 hours a day, 5 days a week)




were: 400 ppm, monkeys;200 ppm, rats and rabbits; and 100 ppm, guinea




pigs (43).  Prendergast et_ a^. (44) demonstrated no effects levels in




rats, guinea pigs, rabbits, dogs, and monkeys to be 730 ppm, 8 hours




daily, 5 days per week, for 6 weeks and 36 ppm, °4 hours a day, for




90 days.




     The wide range of adverse effects arising from chronic exposure




to trichloroethylene can be seen from the study of Cagianelli et al.




(45).  In this effort, male rats were sprayed twice a day with this




substance for 40 days.  By the 40th day, some damage to the liver and




heart and more serious damage to the kidneys was noted.  Transaminase




and Y globulin levels were increased and serum albumin levels were




decreased.  The experimental animals showed a marked decrease in




weight and a reduction in mature red cells, reticulocytes,* leuko-
*A young red blood cell.
                                   22

-------
cytes,* and platelets** in the peripheral blood.  Bone marrow activi-

ty was greatly depressed.  Rats injected with 0.004 moles trichloro-

ethylene per kilogram showed evidence of functional hepatic changes

and microscopic evidence of liver damage 12 to 16 hours following ex-

posure.  These effects were apparently reversible and disappeared

after 24 hours (46).  Moderate liver damage was reported in guinea

pigs exposed for over 1100 hours to levels of 1200 ppm trichloro-

ethylene (47); in dogs exposed to 750 ppm repeatedly for 3 weeks

(48); and in mice exposed to 1600 ppm, 4 hours a day, 6 times per

week.

     Cats exposed to 20 ppm trichloroethylene for 60 to 90 minutes

for 4 to 6 months showed damage to liver, kidneys, spleen, and lymph-

atic ganglions*** (50) , lending additional support to the Ikeda

hypothesis (11).

     Rats and rabbits exposed to trichloroethylene for 40 to 50 min-

utes, 5 to 6 times per week, showed levels of glutamic-oxalacetic

transaminase and glutamic-pyruvic transaminase increased above normal

by 58 percent and 27 percent, respectively (51).  An intramuscular

injection of a total of 8.75 to 9 mg/kg trichloroethylene in rabbits

resulted in a 26 percent decrease in the level of ATP**** in the retina.
   *White blood cells.
  **A circular or oval disk found in  the blood of all mammals which  is
    concerned in coagulation of the blood and contraction of the  clot.
 ***Lymph nodes.
****Adenosine triphosphate.
                                 23

-------
Levels of aldolase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, lactic dehy-

drogenase, and hexokinase were also decreased, whereas malate dehydro-

genase and NAD* -sorbitol dehydrogenase were elevated.  Most of the

changes in enzyme activity were reversible; however, aldolase and

glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity as well as ATP concentra-

tion failed to return to normal levels by two weeks following ex-

posure (52).

     Effects on the immune system were reported in rabbits exposed

to 10 mg/rn3, 4 hours daily, for 9 weeks.  These effects consisted of

inhibition of antibody formation and of the activity of neutrophils**

(53).  Exposure of rabbits to 100 mg/m3, 3 hours daily, for 8 to 10

months, resulted in a decreased total antibody titer following typhoid

immunization.

     Bradycardia was induced in guinea pigs by intraperitoneal in-

jection of either trichloroethylene or its metabolite, trichloro-

ethanol.   The latter proved twice as effective in slowing the heart

and the authors suggested that metabolic conversion to trichloro-

ethanol was responsible for many of the observed toxic effects of tri-

chloroethylene (55) .

     Effects on the brain and behavioral abnormalities have also been

reported.  Acute exposure of rabbits to 7000 ppm to 14,000 ppm for 15
 *Nicotinamide-adenine-dinucleotide.
**A white blood cell stainable by neutral dyes.

-------
to 60 minutes produced changes In the electroencephalogram ranging




from minor up to electroclinical epileptic seizures  (56).  Further




studies on rabbits that were chronically intoxicated with alcohol




revealed that subsequent exposure to trichloroethylene  induced graver




functional disturbances of longer duration even though  the dose of




trichloroethylene was half the strength used previously (57).  These




studies constitute evidence for the suggestion that alcohol may ag-




gravate the effects of trichloroethylene intoxication.   Rats exposed




to 400 ppm for 8 hours, 5 times per week, exhibited decreased perfor-




mance in swimming tests and increased exploratory behavior (58).




Exposure to 800 ppm and 1600 ppm produced further decrements in per-




formance with the animals exhibiting 65 percent and 58  percent of




their normal activity, respectively (.59).




     The lethal concentration via inhalation for rats exposed for




A hours was 8000 ppm  (60).  The lethal concentration in rabbits ex-




posed for 50 minutes was 11,000 ppm (61).  The concentration lethal




to 50 percent of flatfish exposed for 96 hours (96 hours LCcQ) was




16 mg/1 (2).




     Trichloroethylene has recently been implicated as  a potent liver




carcinogen* in mice by the National Cancer Institute.   Striking dif-




ferences were observed between the incidence of hepatocellular
*A cancer-producing substance.
                                 25

-------
carcinomas* in mice given trichloroethylene and in controls.  Male

mice were given either 2400 mg/kg or 1200 mg/kg doses, while females

received 1800 mg/kg or 900 mg/kg.  Doses were given by gastric  intu-

bation.  Of the mice given the lower doses, 30.6 percent developed

liver cancer.  Of those receiving the higher doses, 43.2 percent were

affected.  The incidence of spontaneous liver cancer in the control

group was 2.5 percent (63) .  Rats given a 500 mg/kg or 1000 mg/kg

dose failed to develop cancer, but it was suggested that the extreme-

ly high dose was very toxic to the animals and might have clouded the

study.  Inhalation studies conducted at Dow laboratories, showed that

trichloroethylene was not teratogenic** in mice or rats at 300  ppm

(64).  No mutagenesis studies have been reported. Toxicologic effects

in all species, including man, are presented in Table IV.

     Of all the effects reported in both animals and man, only  those

relating to central nervous system depression seem entirely conclu-

sive.  These effects, all of which are summarized in Table II,  appar-

ently occur at concentrations to which certain industrial workers may

realistically be exposed and have, in fact, been shown to occur in

such workers.  Evidence on damage to the liver is not conclusive.

"Moderate" or "reversible" damage has been demonstrated in animals at

relatively high concentrations (10 to 16 times the typical industrial

concentrations). The extent to which trichloroethylene damages  the
 *A malignant new growth made up of epithelial cells tending to
  infiltrate the surrounding tissues and spread.
**The production of physical defects in offspring in_ utero.
                                  26

-------
                                             TABLE IV
                                       TOXICOLOGICAL EFFECTS
ANIMAL ROUTE DOSE
Rat Spray

Injection 530 ppm
Inhalation 400 ppm
800 ppm
1600 ppm
Mouse Gastric 900 -
intubation 2400 ppm
Inhalation. 1600 ppm
Guinea pig Inhalation 1200 ppm
Injection varied
Dog Inhalation 750 ppm
LENGTH OF EXPOSURE EFFECTS
2 times/day; 40 days damage to liver,
heart, kidneys
loss of weight
pancytopenia
bone marrow de-
pression
changes in enzyme
activities
16 hours reversible liver
damage
progressive loss
8 hours; 5 times/week of activity
	 liver cancer

4 hours/day liver damage
6 days/week
1100 hours liver damage
	 bradycardia
3 weeks liver damage
REF.
45

46
59
63

49
47
55
48
•o
VI

-------
                                              TABLE IV (CONTINUED)
           ANIMAL
ROUTE
                                           DOSE
                            LENGTH OF  EXPOSURE
                                                                                    EFFECTS
                                                                          REF.
         Cat
         Rabbit
to
oo
Inhalation
Lnhalation
                            Injection
20 ppm
 Varied
                 9 ppm
                           Inhalation      10 ppm
                           Inhalation     100 ppm
                           Inhalation     7000 -
                                         14,000 ppm
 60-90 minutes
   4-6 months
40-50 minutes
5-6 tinier/week
                                  4 hours/d.iy
                                    9 weeks
                                 3 hours/day
                                8-10 months

                                  15-60 minutes
damage to liver,   50
spleen, kidneys
and lymphatic
ganglions

increased trans-   51
  aminase levels

decreased ATP level 52
changes in enzyme
  activity

inhibition of anti- 53
  body formation
  and neutrophil
  activity
                                       decreased total
                                         antibody titre
                                           54
                                       minor to major     56
                                         changes in elec- 57
                                         troencephalogram
                                         which are aggreva-
                                         ted by alcohol

-------
                                                TABLE IV (CONTINUED)
             ANIMAL
ROUTE
                                            DOSE
                                                          LENGTH OF EXPOSURE
                                                         EFFECTS
                           REF.
          Human
ro
Inhalation    1000 ppra
                             Inhalation
                             Oral
                             Inhalation
                             Cnhalatlon
              up to 8000
                ppm

                varied
                             Inhalation      varied
                             Inhalation       varied
                             Inhalation       varied
                             Inhalation       varied
                                                                2 hours
              90-130 ppm    two 4-hour sessions
                              separated by 1.5
                              hours
                                                              chronic
                                                              chronic
                                                              acute
                                                              acute
                                                              acute
                                                              acute
decreased perfor-            29
  mance in psycho-
  physiological
  tests

decreased perfor-            31
  mance on tests
  of memory, per-
  ception and
  manual dexterity

death from hepa-             31
  torenal failure

death from ventrlc-          32
  ular fibrillation

lost sense of smell,         34
  death from cardiac
  arrest; fatty de-
  generation of liver

paralysis of face,           35
  neck muscles; death

loss of taste; trige-        38
  minal nerve paralysis

complete loss of hear-       39
  ing for tones over
  1000 cps

temporary paranoid           40
  psychosis; distortion
  of horizontal, vertical
  vision

-------
                                               TABLE IV (CONCLUDED)
             ANIMAL
 ROUTE
 DOSE
                                                           LENGTH OF EXPOSURE
                                                              EFFECTS
         Human
Inhalation
u
o
                            Inhalation
 varied
( >20 ppm)
                 varied
3-6 years
                   chronic
headache, dizziness,
  nausea, sleepiness,
  fatigue, euphoria,
  palpitation, dis-
  turbance of vision,
  irritability, dis-
  turbed sleep, anxiety,
  loss of appetite,
  excessive sweating,
  alcohol intolerance,
  vertigo, tremors,
  vomiting, bradycardia,
  other electroencepho-
  lograph disturbances

total blindness
                                                                                                             12
                                                                                                             13
                                                                                                             14
                                                                                                             19
                                               22
                                               23
                            Inhalation
                            Inhalation
                            Inhalation
                                             varied
                 varied
                 varied
                                                               chronic
                   chronic
                   chronic
                    total loss of tactiJe      16
                      sense

                    increased levels of        24
                      leucocyte alkaline
                      ohosphatase and blood
                      acid phosphatase

                    abnormalities of cephalin  28
                      flocculation,  total
                      lipids and unsaturated
                      fatty acids, increase
                      in beta and gamma glo-
                      bulins
         *An abnormal or exaggerated  sense  of  well-being.

-------
human liver is difficult to ascertain since many of  the  subjects

were heavy users of alcohol and this fact tended to  cloud  the

studies Csee, for example, 32).

     The claim for carcinogenisis also is inconclusive.  Studies were

done using massive doses in highly susceptible animals  (mice with a

2.5 percent incidence of liver cancer in the controls).  In less

susceptible animals (rats), no effects were observed.   In  any event,

the dose used would be equivalent to a human drinking 50 million cups

of decaffeinated coffee each day for a lifetime.

     3.  Other Effects.  Exposure to 0.6 percent trichloroethylene

was shown to decrease the output of light emitted by the luminous

bacteria Photobacterium phosphoreum (65).  A general bacteriostatic

effect on alpha hemolytic streptococci, gram-positive and  gram-

negative diplococci, Corynebacterium and Brucella melitensis, was

noted in the human oropharyngeal* cavity following exposure to tri-

chloroethylene during anaesthesia (66).  E. coli exposed to 1.9

to 3.9 percent trichloroethylene exhibited reduced survival in pro-

portion to the dose, with the higher dose being 100  percent lethal

(67).

     While trichloroethylene is itself a noncorrosive chemical, it

readily undergoes oxidation to acidic materials that are highly

corrosive, damaging many metal surfaces with which they  come into
*The oropharynx is the division of the pharynx  that  lies between
 the soft palate and upper edge of the epiglottis.

                                  31

-------
contact.

     4.  Present,  On«-golng Research. C68).

     o  "Correlation Between Breathing Zone Solvent Concentrations
        and Solvent Losses from Vapor Degreasers."  N. A. Esmen,
        University of Delaware, School of  Engineering.

     A study for the U.S. Department of Defense at Frankford Arsenal

is in progress to  determine whether or not present ventilation

systems offer adequate protection to workers from trichloroethylene

vapor loss.  Actual concentrations in the  presence and absence of

ventilation will be measured and compared  to those expected from the

particular ventilation system.  Causes of  overexposure will be

identified and recommendations made.

     o  "Hepatotoxic Potential of Solvent  and Amphetamine Abuse."
        G..J. Troiger, University of Kansas, School of Pharmacy.

     While trichloroethylene in itself does not exhibit significant

potential for the production of liver injury, its abuse, via inhala-

tion of cleaning fluids in conjunction with potentiating agents such

as acetone (via inhalation of airplane glue) or amphetamines, may

represent a potential hazard.  This project will evaluate the ef-

fects of acetone and amphetamine on chlorinated hydrocarbon hepato-

toxicity under conditions similar to those present during abuse.

Both adult and immature animals will be tested.

     o  "Behavioral/Neurological Evaluation of Solvent Exposures."
        B. Gutnik and C. Xintaros, U.S. Department of Health,
        Education and Welfare, P.H.S. Center for Disease Control.

     Approximately 150 workers who experience chronic occupational

exposure to trichloroethylene will be studied to: (a) detect behav-

                                  32

-------
ioral and neurological changes; (b) correlate these changes with

exposure, body burden, accidents, and illnesses derived from their

records; and (c) ascertain the effectiveness of behavioral function

measurements as an early warning indicator of adverse exposure.

     o  "Quick Response Evaluation of Behavioral Effects of Tri-
        chloroethylene."  C. Xintaros and H. Cohen, U.S. Department
        of Health, Education  and Welfare, P.H.S. Center for Disease
        Control.

     This project will assess the validity of findings reported by

Salvini et al. 1971 C31) concerning trichloroethylene effects on

human performance capabilities at the current exposure level of 100

ppm.  This work is necessary before the Department of Labor estab-

lishes a new Trichloroethylene Standard.
                                 33

-------
     C.   AMBIENT CONCENTRATIONS, POPULATION AT RISK AND MEASUREMENT
         TECHNOLOGY

     It  has been estimated that approximately 600,000 tons of tri-

chloroethylene are released to the atmosphere each year and that

10,000 tons are released to the ocean (64), a combined loss of 610,000

tons per year, or approximately 60 percent of total world production.

However, trichloroethylene is not considered to be a persistent envi-

ronmental contaminant because it has a low water solubility, high vapor

pressure, and rapid atmospheric photodegradation rate (sea level half-

life of  0.3 days).  Using the methodology described in the NAS publi-

cation "Assessing Ocean Pollutants" (1975), a transport model for

trichloroethylene has been prepared (64).  From this analysis, it is con-

cluded that trichloroethylene is leaving the biosphere as rapidly as

it is being introduced, and is not accumulating.  The short half-life

and low concentration suggest that trichloroethylene will not contri-

bute significantly to the levels of chlorine in the stratosphere.

Based on data concerning water solubility and vapor pressure and by

comparision with similar compounds, CC1, and CoCl,, bioconcentration

of trichloroethylene should not be a significant environmental

factor.

     A summary of typical concentrations of trichloroethylene in the

various  sectors of the environment is presented in Table V.  Ambient

concentrations in air are about 11 nanograms/m-*, or 20 parts per

trillon  (ppt).  In water, background concentration levels are approx-

imately 0.6 nanograms/liter (0.1 ppt) (64).  A background concentra-

                                  34

-------
                         TABLE V


     OCCURRENCE OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE IN THE ENVIRONMENT
                 TYPICAL CONCENTRATIONS (W/W)

Air
Rainwater

Surface water
Potable water
Sea water
Marine sediments
Marine invertebrates
Fish

Waterbirds

Marine mammals
Fatty foods
Non-fatty foods
Human organs
Human body fat
MINIMUM
io-9
io-11
-11
10 1J-
io-11
io-10
io-10
io-9
10"9
_q
10 y
-9
10
io-9
io"9
io-9
io-9
MAXIMUM
io-8
io-9
_Q
10
io-9
io-9
io-9
io-8
io-8
_-J
> 10
Q
> 10 B
ID'8
io-9
io"9
io-8
Source:  McConnell, G.,  Ferguson, D.M. and Pearson, C.R.
         "Chlorinated Hydrocarbons and the Environment."
         Endeavor 34. 13-18 (1975).
                            35

-------
tion in western Ireland of 15 ppt for the period June-July 1975 was

reported (69).  Areas far removed from urban industrialized centers,

however, reported values of less than 5 ppt.  Such areas include

sites over the North Atlantic (October 1973) (64) and rural Pullman,

Washington (December 1974-February 1975) (70).

     Ambient levels of trichloroethylene in the vicinity of the

production facilities have not been reported.  However, it is

possible to develop a computed estimate of expected levels.

     Five plants in the United States produce trichloroethylene with

total annual production of 430 million pounds.   Specific details on

the operational characteristics and the atmospheric emissions of

individual plants are not readily available.  It is known, however,

that trichloroethylene is emitted from vents, not stacks (71).  In

order to estimate ambient levels of trichloroethylene in the vicinity

of its production units, the use of diffusion equations is necessary.

Hypothetical plant conditions could be used as  inputs to a Gaussian

plume equation* from Turner's Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Esti-
*Ground-level downwind concentrations resulting from a point source
 are predicted by the following equation:
   X(x, 0, 0; H) = 	9	  exp   |"-l/2(Ji)2l
                   ™y az V        I     °z  J
where:   Q = uniform emission rate (grams/sec)
         u = mean wind speed affecting the plume (meter/sec)
         H = effective stack height; that is, sum of stack height
             plus plume rise (meters)
        a  = horizontal dispersion coefficient evaluated in terms of
             downwind distance to the point for which the concentra-
             tion is being computed (meters) -
        az = vertical dispersion coefficient evaluated in terms of
             downwind distance to the point for which the concen-
             tration is being computed (meters)
         X = ground-level concentration on plume axis (grams/meter^)
                                  36

-------
mates (72).  The basic diffusion equation should be modified,  however,




due to the effect of the plant itself on the  flow  of  air.  Mechanical




turbulence in the wake of a building tends to produce aerodynamic  down-




wash, resulting in the fairly rapid diffusion of a gaseous emission  down




to the ground.  This region of disturbed flow extends downwind a distance




equal to several times the height of the building.  While this situation




does not result in a Gaussian distributed plume, a modification of




the formula still can be employed.  This is because the  turbulent




mixing in the wake of the building is assumed to be distributed uni-




formly in the vertical direction, analogous to  the situation where a




plume is trapped below an inversion layer.  A limited vertical mixing




height can be modeled using the equation:






                    X(X« °' Z; H) =
where L is the limit of  the mixing depth  and  z  is  <_ L.   In  the  case




of an isolated rectangular building,  it is  assumed that  L equals




1.5 times the building height.




     In addition,  there  is a horizontal wind  turbulence  which is




assumed to result  in an  initial  horizontal  plume spread  equal to  the




width of the building normal to  the wind  direction.   This is  analo-




gous to an area source emission  where the area  source is the  build-




ing top.  This can be modeled  using a further modification  of the




basic Gaussian diffusion equation.  A virtual point  source  is assumed




upwind from the building at a  distance where  the plume spread (for
                                  37

-------
the given stability conditions) would equal the crosswind width of

the building.  The modified diffusion equation is therefore:


               x(x, 0, z; H) =    ,   (1<2h)
                                  y
where H is the building height and o1 is based on the downwind distance

to the receptor point plus the upwind distance to the vertical point

source.

     Assuming that a typical plant producing trichloroethylene is

equipped with control equipment having a 98 percent removal effi-

ciency, a plant producing 280 million pounds of trichloroethylene

annually would have a potei tial trichloroethylene emission rate of

80 grams per second.  With reasonable assumptions, the concentration

500 meters downwind of a plant would be approximately 570 yg/m , or

0.106 ppm.*  An individual standing 500 meters downwind of a pro-

duction facility would have to remain there for 11.4 years in order

to inhale the minimum amount of trichloroethylene reported to result

in slight central nervous system depression (5 ppm, 40 hours/week

for 50 weeks).  He must remain for 228 years in order to inhale an

amount equivalent to that inhaled by an industrial worker occupa-

tionally exposed to 100 ppm over an 8-hour work day.

     Several studies have been performed on atmospheric concentra-

tions of trichloroethylene in vapor degreasir.g workshops where the
*Assumptions employed are:  (1) trichloroethylene is nonreactive;
 (2) atmospheric stability class is neutral; (3) wind speed is 6
 meters/sec.; (4) building height is 50 feet (15.24 meters); and  (5)
 width is 100 feet (30.48 meters).

                                  38

-------
major danger of exposure exists.  In one study, Grandjean  (73)




measured trichloroethylene concentrations in the air surrounding




cold trichloroethylene vats wholly lacking in safety devices or




ventilation systems.  Measured values ranged from 67 to 157 ppm




(average, 105 ppm) trichloroethylene.  While vapor degreasing oper-




ations were being performed, the average concentration in  the air




was 167 ppm.  Installation of appropriate ventilation and  exhaust




systems decreased the concentration to 53 ppm.  Atmospheric con-




centrations during a twice-weekly cleaning procedure were  1120




ppm outside the tank as emptying took place and 815 ppm inside




the tank for the-duration of the 30-minute cleaning operation.




     Ahlmark et. al. (74) performed an extensive study of 18 degreas-




ing tanks in 14 plants in Sweden.  The extent of exposure  was deter-




mined in terms of time and concentrations by sampling breathing




zones for a variety of operations.  Mean exposure was 50 ppm (range




0 to 400 ppm) for degreasing operations, while the highest mean




value was 225 ppm (range 10 to 375 ppm) for the cleaning operation.




Results of this study are summarized in Table VI.




     The National Institute of Occupational Health and Safety has




estimated that approximately 200,000 workers are exposed to tri-




chloroethelene in the United States  (1).  No detailed statistics




were provided.  It was estimated, however, that the majority of exposed




workers are employed in industry associated with vapor degreasing of




metals.  The smaller number of workers also exposed are primarily





                                  39

-------
                          TABLE VI
  Job Location
TRICHLOROETHYLENE EXPOSURE IN
SWEDISH ENGINEERING WORKSHOPS*

                    Trichloroethylene (ppm)

        Minutes**    Range           Mean
  Open air

  Less than 5 meters
    from tank

  Greater than 5
    meters from tank

  Sorting, before
    degreasing

  Degreasing

  Sorting, after
    degreasing

  Cleansing

  Inspection of tank

  Refilling
          2.5
0-0
0
4.8
4.5
2.7
4.7
2.4
4.8
4.7
4.8
0-140
0-80
0-375
0-400
0-375
10-375
0-375
10-415
23
7
32
50
46
46
70
36
 *Ahlmark, A., Gerhardsson, G.  and Holm,  A.  "Trichloroethylene
  Exposure in Swedish Engineering Workshops" in Proceedings of
  the XIVth Internation Congress on Occupational Health,  Madrid,
  Sept. 1963, pp.448-450.

**Mean time spent by each  operator at the various locations.
  It is understood that an operator may perform at a given
  location with greater frequency than another operator.
                             40

-------
employed in industries which, consume trichloroethylene  (e.g., dry




cleaning plants).  A negligible number of workers is believed to be




exposed at production facilities.  The main exposure hazard is for




the users, not the producers, of trichloroethylene, since the chemical




is synthesized in a closed-system apparatus.  Dow Chemical and PPG




Industries, the two largest producers of trichloroethylene in the




United States, claim that levels in their production plants are




well below 100 ppm (63).  A Dow spokesman noted that, in contrast,




the average level in degreasing plants is usually below 100 ppm, but




considerable levels above this limit are common (63).  In 1973,




OSHA recommended a 100 ppm ceiling in the air as a time-weighted




average during an 8-hour workday.  They also recommended a 200 ppm




maximum for 15 minute's exposure and a 300 ppm upper limit (1).




     Dow and PPG claim that none of their trichloroethylene




customers use this chemical in a consumer product (73).  However, it




is found in products sold directly to the public.  A home cleaning




fluid found on the shelf of a suburban Washington, D.C. drugstore




was labeled as containing trichloroethylene (63).  And since tri-




chloroethylene is commonly used to extract caffein from coffee and




oleoresin flavorings from spices, ingestion of this substance by the




public does occur.  Current FDA limits are 10 ppm of trichloro-




ethylene In decaffeinated instant coffee, 25 ppm In decaffeinated




ground coffee; and 30 ppm in spices (63).




     Determination of concentrations of trichloroethylene in air





                                  41

-------
samples is a two-step process, requiring collection  and  analysis.




Collection methods include evacuated  gas sampling flasks (75),  plastic




bags, absorbents  (79), and activated  charcoal  (80-82).   Three  types




of analytical methods are available:  physical methods, such  as  inter-




ferometry or gas  chromatography;  chemical methods, which depend upon




a specific reaction of trichloroethylene; and destructive methods,




such as combustion techniques that decompose trichloroethylene  and




liberate hydrochloric acid (76).  Field methods  for  estimation  of




trychloroethylene vapor in the air include use of the Davis  Halide




Meter and direct  reading colorimetric indicator  tubes (83, 84).





     Adsorption onto activated charcoal represents the easiest and




most efficient method of collection.   Utilization of adsorbing




liquids is inconvenient, especially for collecting breathing-zone




samples.  Use of plastic bags or evacuated containers often results




in loss of sample due to adsorption onto the walls,  permeation




through the plastic, or escape around joints.  On humid days, the




excessive water vapor tends to displace trichloroethylene from silica




gel when this method is employed  (85).




     Gas chromatography is the most specific and sensitive of all




the measurement methods in use and is the method of  choice (81, 85-87).




Other methods are subject to inaccuracy dug tJ interferences by other




chlorinated solvents or chloride-containing compounds, and are accept-




able only if trichloroethylene is the sole contaminent (78, 83).
                                   42

-------
     Biologic monitoring of the exposed workers is also possible.




A preferred method consists of breath analysis—that is, determina-




tion of the trichloroethylene concentration in the exhaled air of a




given worker.  It has been determined that a breath sample collected




approximately three hours after exposure will provide a concentration




of trichloroethylene that is directly proportional to the time-




weighted average concentration experienced during exposure (30).
                                  43

-------
     D.   SOURCES




     Trichloroethylene was first prepared by Fischer in 1864 in  the




course of experiments on the reduction of hexachloroethane with




hydrogen.  A process for the manufacture of trichloroethylene from




acetylene was developed in Vienna between 1903 and 1905, and commer-




cial production commenced in 1908.  Trichloroethylene was not pro-




duced commercially in the United States until 1925.  At that time,




only a few hundred tons per year were consumed in minor extraction




processes and in such products as boot polish and printers' ink




driers.   It was not until the 1930's that the applications in metal




degreasing and dry cleaning operations placed trichloroethylene  in




strong demand (2).




     Before 1967, 85 percent of the trichloroet^vlene produced in




the United States was prepared from acetylene by chlorination to




form 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethene, followed by dehydrochlorination  of




the latter to the desired product.  At present, 85 percent of tri-




chloroethylene production proceeds via the chlorination or oxyhy-




drochlorination of ethylene, with the intermediate formation of




ethylene dichloride.  The latter is then further chlorinated to  tri-




chloroethylene (1) .




     There are five producers of trichloroethylene in the United




States today.  The locations of their plants and their production




capacities are listed in Table VII.  A map of the production facil-




ities is given in Figure 1.  Trichloroethylene is also produced  in
                                 44

-------
                               TABLE VII
                TRICHLOROETHYLENE PRODUCTION  (in 1970)'
       PRODUCER

Diamond Shamrock

Dow Chemical

Ethyl Corporation

Occidental Petroleum
  (Hooker)

PPG Industries
      LOCATION

Deer Park, Texas

Freeport, Texas

Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Taft, Louisiana
      CAPACITY
  Million Lbs./Yr.

100 (5 x 104 tons)

150 (7.5xl04 tons)

 50 (2.5xl04 tons)

 40 (2 x 104 tons)
Lake Charles, Louisiana  280 (1.4x10  tons)
                                     Total       620 x 10  Ibs.
                                                 (3.1 x 10  tons)
Source:  Chemical Information Services, Stanford Research Institute,
         1975 Directory of Chemical Producers - USA Page 725.
                                45

-------
                         FIGURE 1
          TRICHLOROETHYLENE PRODUCTION CAPACITY
= 100 million pounds/year

  (5 x 10A tons)

-------
many countries around the world and a significant amount has been




imported into the United States over the years.




     The annual peak production level of trichloroethylene in the




United States occurred in 1970.  During that year, 610 million pounds




(305,000 tons) were manufactured.  In 1966, the classification of




trichloroethylene as a photochemically reactive smog contributant re-




sulted in a decreased use of the chemical, which was subsequently re-




flected in production figures.  At present, about 430 million pounds




(215,000 tons) are manufactured in the United States (63).  The world




annual production capacity is estimated (1973) to be approximately




one million tons (62).




     Trichloroethylene is produced by feeding oxygen-free high-purity




chlorine gas and acetylene into a packed tower at 50°C and atmo-




spheric pressure.  The tower is equipped with a condenser to reflux




part of the tetrachloroethane product.  Chlorine and acetylene react




to form tetrachloroethane, which is partially withdrawn from the




reactor, vaporized, and superheated to 300°C.  It is then fed to a




tower filled with activated carbon (dehydrochlorination), where




trichloroethylene is formed.  Hydrogen chloride, trichloroethylene,




and unconverted tetrachloroethane from the dehydrochlorination are




fed to a stripping column where the hydrogen chloride is stripped off




overhead and absorbed in water as hydrochloric acid.  Bottoms are




fed to a second stripper where trichloroethylene is taken off over-




head.  This process for producing trichloroethylene has two air





                                  47

-------
pollution emission points, the vent on the reflux condenser connected




to the reactor and the vent on the tail gas absorber (71).




     Over 90 percent of all trichloroethylene produced is used by




industrial metal fabricating plants for vapor degreasing.  Since




the late 1960's, tetrachloroethylene and methylene chloride have also




been used for this purpose.  However, trichloroethylene still com-




mands 50 percent of the vapor degreasing market.  The remaining 5 to




10 percent of the trichloroethylene produced is utilized for a wide




variety of applications (2).  As an extractive solvent, trichloro-




ethylene has been used for the selective extraction of foods and




medicines, including fish meal, meat meal, oil-containing seeds, soya




beans, coffee beans (for decaffeination), spices, and alkaloids.




Analyses of a wide range of foods of both anima^ and vegetable origin




for trichloroethylene residues have been performed.  The results are




presented in Table VIII.  General Foods, Inc., the largest producer of




decaffeinated coffee, has recently disclosed that it is abandoning




the use of trichloroethylene for decaffeinating coffee.  Instead, it




is replacing this solvent with methylene chloride (88).  As a dry




cleaning solvent, trichloroethylene has been used for removing oils




and waxes from both natural fibers (cotton and wool) and synthetic




fibers (rayon, fiberglass, and cotton polyester material) by the




textile industry.  Other minor applications include:  fur cleaning




agent, motion picture film cleaner, dilutent or carrier in paints,




adhesives and varnishes, formulation in paint removers, low tempera-






                                  48

-------
                            TABLE VIII

                 TRICHLOROETHYLENE IN FOODSTUFFS
                    (CONCENTRATIONS IN ug/kg)

            FOODSTUFF                       TRICHLOROETHYLENE

Dairy Produce:
     Fresh milk                                    0.3
     Cheshire cheese                               3
     English butter                               10
     Hen's eggs                                     0.6

Meat:

     English beef (steak)                         16
     English beef (fat)                           12
     Pig's liver                                  22

Oils and fats:
     Margarine                                     6
     Olive oil (Spanish)                           9
     Cod liver oil                                19
     Vegetable cooking oil                         7
     Castor oil                                   ND

Beverages:
     Canned fruit drink                            5
     Light ale                                     0.7
     Canned orange juice                          ND
     Instant coffee                                4
     Tea (packet)                                 60
     Wine (Yugoslav)                               0.02

Fruit and vegetables:

     Potatoes (S.Wales)                           ND
     Potatoes (N.W. England)                       3
     Apples                                        5
     Pears                                         4
     Tomatoes*                                     1.7

     Black grapes (imported)                       2.9
     Fresh bread                                   7

*Tomato plants were grown on a reclaimed lagoon at Runcorn Works of
 ICI.
ND - Not detected.

Source:  McConnell, G., Ferguson, D.M. and Pearson, C.R. "Chlorinated
         Hydrocarbons and the Environment."  Endeavor 34. 13-18 (1975)
                                 49

-------
ture heat transfer agent, and chemical Intermediate in the synthesis




of glycolic and dichloroacetic acids.  Trichloroethylene also ex-




periences limited use as an analgesic and general anaesthetic, with




about 60,000 patient exposures per year (63).  Industrial uses are




summarized in Table IX and a flow chart of distribution is presented




in Figure 2.
                                  50

-------
                                            TABLE IX

                           INDUSTRIAL OR END USE OF TRICHLOROETHYLENE  (1974)
            USE
Vapor degreasing of metals

Food and drug extraction
  (fish meal, meat meal, oil containing seeds,
   soyabeans, coffee beans, spices and alkaloids)
Drycleaning solvent
Solvent in textile industry
Fur cleaning agent
Motion picture film cleaner
Dilutent or carrier in paints, adhesives, and
  varnishes
Formulation in paint remover
Low temperature heat transfer agent
Chemical intermediate in the synthesis of glycolic
  and dichloroacetic acids
Analgesic and general anesthetic
PERCENT
 > 90
      AMOUNT
  (Millions Lbs.)

389 (1.95xl05 tons)
 < 10
341 (1.7x10  tons)

-------
                                                        FIGURE 2
                                       SUMMARY OF PRODUCT RELEASE INFORMATION
Ln
to
       Trichloroethylene
        R =  429.5 million  Ibs/yr
            (2.15 x  105 tons/yr)
Imports
60.7 million Ibs/yr
(3 x 10* tons/yr)
Export.,
42.0 million 3bs/yr
(2.1 x 10* tons/yr)

Total
Productio
(P)
426.7 mil
(2.13x105
i
Loss of c
6.4 mill!
(3.2 x 10
FPI. " °'°

U.S.
n 1974
. Ibs/yr
tons/yr)
N
r
ompound
on Ibs/yr
3 tons)
15

X
Loss of by-produc
N.A.
1 t
Total U.S.
Consumption
(0
445.4 million Ibs/yr
(2.23xl05 tons/yr)
t

FD = 0.95
Dispersive use
42J.1 million Ibs/yr
(2.12 x 105 tons/yr)
1.7 x 1C
Million Ib
389 ^
1.95 x 105
34.1.
tons/yr
s/yr
Metal
Cleaner
tons/yr
Other
extractant
In food proc. ,
solvent,
chemical
intermediate,
anesthetic
             Source:   S.L., Chan, F.Y., Jones, J.L., Liu, D.H.,  McCaleb,  K.E.,  M.N.T.,  Sopios, K.N.
                      and Schendel, D. E. "Research Program on  Hazard  Priority  Ranking  of Manufactured
                      Chemicals."  SRI Project ECU-3386.  Stanford Research  Institute, Menlo Park, California.
            R = production rate

            F  = fraction dispersal
             PL = fraction of production lost

-------
     E.  CONTROL




     Workers in industrial or commercial operations utilizing tri-




chloroethylene run the major risk of exposure.  Therefore, it is




essential that careful controls be implemented such that the time-




weighted average concentration in the atmosphere over an 8-hour work




day for these personnel does not exceed 100 ppm.  Several methods




are available to control the emission of solvent vapors into the




general work environment (1)•




     1.  Substitution of Less Harmful Solvents.  Any solvent con-




sidered a potential replacement for trichloroethylene must first be




examined in terms of effectiveness, relative volatility, volume of




air required to dilute the vapor in the work environment to a safe




level, relative amounts of each solvent required for the task, like-




lihood of control of vapor concentration, and flammability. Tetra-




chloroethylene. and dichloroethylene have been found effective in both




degreasing and dry cleaning applications (63, 2).




     2.  Proper Design of Condensation Apparatus.  High concentrations




of trichloroethylene in the atmosphere, especially around degreasing




operations, are a result of solvent escape from evaporation and




spills.  It is, therefore, important to control the evaporation and




condensation rates by an appropriate balance between heat input and




condensation capacity of refrigerated condenser coils.




     3.  Process Ventilation and Process Location.  Ventilation is




by far the most common engineering method for controlling solvent






                                  53

-------
vapors and vapor recovery systems are possible when a high airflow




exhaust system is required for good ventilation.  Grandjean  (73)




investigated the effectiveness of a fixed lateral exhaust system,




intended to remove rising trichloroethylene vapor at the top of a




degreasing tank.  The system lowered the average trichloroethylene




concentration from 167 to 112 ppm.  In one case where both an ex-




haust system and a vapor condensation system were operating, the




average concentration of atmospheric trichloroethylene was reduced




from 105 to 30 ppm.




     A further decrease in the concentration of trichloroethylene




vapors can be expected if the degreasing operation is located in a




large room with good ventilation wherein the entire work area is




continuously flushed with uncontaminated air.  I." the exhaust system




is properly designed, it will prevent the accumulation or recircula-




tion of trichloroethylene vapors in the operation area.  In  the




Grandjean study (73), addition of an air-blowing system to improve




general ventilation further lowered the trichloroethylene concentra-




tion from 112 to 53 ppm.  Areas in the vicinity of doors, windows,




or other possible sources of draft conditions should be avoided




since excessive air movements could decrease the effectiveness of




local exhaust systems.  Skinner (89) reported the use of baffles on




windows near degreasers to control high velocity drafts.  This pro-




cedure reduced the trichloroethylene concentration from a range of




170 to 230 ppm to 30 to 40 ppm.






                                  54

-------
     Finally, trtchloroethylene vapors should be kept away from




high energy-high temperature sources to reduce the possibility of




decomposition Into chlorine, hydrogen chloride, or phosgene.




     4.  Proper Effluent Treatment.  Scrubbers used on packed towers,




such as those used for the production of trichloroethylene, have




control efficiencies ranging from 90 percent to close to 100 per-




cent (90, 91).




     5.  Proper Handling, Maintenance, and Disposal Procedures. In




small quantities, trichloroethylene should be stored and transported




in lined tins or galvanized mild steel drums fitted with screwcaps




or other suitably tight tops.  Small quantities may also be stored in




amber or green-colored glass containers.  Large quantities should




be stored in mild steel tanks fitted with a drier to prevent the




ingress of moist air.  Ventilation should lead to a safe point out-




side the storage area (2).




     Immediate cleanup of spills, periodic inspection of equipment,




and immediate repair of damaged equipment and leaks must be practiced




to minimize both atmospheric contamination and accidental skin contact




with trichloroethylene.  Waste materials from cleaning that are con-




taminated should be stored in a well-ventilated area until ready for




disposal, and eventually incinerated.  Small quantities of trichloro-




ethylene should be poured into a mixture of 10 percent soda ash and




sand, placed in a suitable container, and incinerated (1).




     Since a wide spectrum of adverse effects, ranging from head-





                                  55

-------
aches to fatalities,  have been reported subsequent to trichloroethy-




lene exposure, it is essential that concentrations to which workers




are exposed remain below the presently established "no effects"




level of 100 ppm.  Thus, effective monitoring programs must be es-




tablished.  Breathing-zone samples should be collected frequently for




each type of job in which exposure is suspected.  The sample should




be collected by drawing air through a charcoal tube to trap the




organic vapors and extraction of the trapped sample may be accom-




plished with carbon disulfide.  An aliquot may then be injected into




a gas chromatograph and trichloroethylene concentration determined




(60).
                                  56

-------
                            REFERENCES

 1.   U.S. Department of Health Education and Welfare, "Criteria for a
     recommended standard—occupational exposure to trichloroethy-
     lene."  1973.

 2.   Hardie,  D. W. F.,  "Trichloroethylene." Encyclopedia of Chemical
     Technology V. 5. Interscience, 1964.

 3.   Irish, D.'D., "Trichloroethylene," Industrial Hygiene and Toxi-
     cology,  second revised edition, Vol II Toxicology, Frank A. Patty,
     editor,  1976.

 4.   National Science Foundation Panel on Manufactured Organic Chemi-
     cals in the Environment, SRI data, 1975.

 5.   Barrett, H. M., and Johnston, J. H., "The Fate of trichloroethylene
     in the organism,"  J. Biol Chem. 127. 765-70, 1939.

 6,   Powell,  J. F.,  "Trichloroethylene:  Absorption, elimination and
     metabolism,"  Brit. J. Ind. Med. 2. 142-45, 1945.

 7.   Butler,  T. C., "Metabolic transformations of trichloroethylene,1.1
     J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 97. 84-92, 1949.

 8.   Souek, B., and Vlachova, D., "Excretion of trichloroethylene
     metabolities in human urine," Brit. J. Ind. Med. 17, 60-64, 1960.

 9.   Bartoniek,. V., "Metabolism and excretion of trichloroethylene
     after inhalation by human subjects,"  Brit. J. Ind. Med. 19,
     134-41,  1962.

10.   Ogata, M., Takatsuka, Y. and Tomokuni, K., "Excretion of organic
     chlorine compounds in the urine of persons exposed to vapours
     of trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene."  Brit. J. Ind.
     Med. 28. 386-91, 1971.

11.   Ikeda, M., Ohtsuji, H., Imamura, T., and Komoike, Y., "Urinary
     excretion of total trichloro-compounds, trichloroethanol and
     trichloro acetic acid as a measure of exposure to trichloroethy-
     lene and tetrachloroethylene,"  Brit. J. Ind. Med. 29. 328-33,
     1972.

12.   Lilis, R., Stanescu, D., Muico, N., and Roventa, A., "Chronic
     effects of trichloroethylene exposure," Med. Lav. 60, 595-601,
     1969.

13.   Andersson, A., "Health dangers in industry from exposure to
     trichloroethylene,"  Acta Med. Scan QSup 323) 157. 7-220, 1957.

                                   57

-------
14.   Bardodej,  Z., and Vyskocil, J., "The problem of trichloroethylene
     in occupational medicine,"  Arch.  Ind. Health 13. 581-92, 1956.

15.   Maloof, C. C., "Burns of the skin  produced by trichloroethylene
     vapors at  room temperature,"  J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol 31, 295-96,
     1949.

16.   McBirney,  R.  S., "Trichloroethylene and dichloroethylene poison-
     ing," Arch. Ind. Hyg. Occup. Med.  10. 130-33, 1954.

17.   Reinl, W., "Scleroderma under the  influence of trichloroethylene?"
     Zentrolbl. Arbeits.  Med. 7. 58-60, 1957.

18.   Stewart, R. D., and  Dodd, H. C.  "Absorption of carbon tetachloride,
     trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, methylene chloride and
     1,1,1 - trichloroethane through the human skin,"  Am Ind. Hyg.
     Assoc. J.  25, 439-46, 1964.

19.   Ahlmark, A.,  and Forssman, S., "Evaluating trichloroethylene expo-
     sures by urinalyses  fi-r trichloroacetic acid,"  Arch.  Ind. Hyg.
     Occup. Med. 3, 386-98, 1951.

20.   Frant, R., and Westendorp, J., "Medical control on exposure of
     industrial workers to trichloroethylene," Arch. Ind. Hyg. Occup.
     Med.  1. 308-18, 1950.

21.   Friberg,  L.,  Kylin,  B. and Nystrom, A., "Toxicities of trichloro-
     ehtylene and tetrachloroethylene and Fujiwara's pyridine - alkali
     reaction," Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 9. 303-12, 1952.

22.   Quadland,  H.  P., "Petroleum solvents and  trichloroethylene"—Part 3
     of the literature study of reports of occupational diseases
     attributed to volatile solvents, Ind. Med. 13, 45-50,  1944.

23.   Kunz,  E.,  and Isenschmidt, R., "The toxic effect of trichloroethy-
     lene  on the eye," Klin. Monatsb. Augenheillkd 94. 577-85, 1935.

24.   Friborska, A., "The  phosphatases of peripheral white blood cells
     in workers exposed to trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene,"
     Brit.  J.  Ind. Med. 26, 159-61, 1969.

25.   Albaha C., Guyotjeannin, C., Flaisler, A., and Thiaucourt, P.,
     "Transaminases and occupational exposure  to trichloroethylene,"
     Arch.  Mol. Prof.. 20. 421-46, 1959.
                                 58

-------
26.   Talot,  F., Vialller, J., Roullett, A., Rivoire, J., and Fig-
     ueres,  J. C., "Hepatic toxicity of trichloroethylene,"  Arch. Mol.
     Prof.  25. 9-15, 1964.

27.   Milby,  T. H., "Chronic trichloroethylene intoxication," J. Occup.
     Med. 10. 252-54, 1968.

28.   Gyotjeannin, C., and Van Steenkiste, J., "Action of trichloro-
     ethylene on proteins and serum lipids—study of 18 employees
     working in a contaminated atmosphere,"  Arch. Mai. Prof. 19 ,
     489-94, 1958.

29.   Vernon, R. J., and Ferguson, R. K.,  "Effects of trichloroethylene
     on visual-motor performance,"  Arch. Environ. Health. 18. 894-
     900, 1969.

30.   Stewart, R. D., Dodd, H. C., Gay, H. H., Erley, D. S.,  "Experimental
     human exposure to trichloroethylene,"  Arch. Environ. Health 20,
     64-71,  1970.

31.   Salvini, M., Binaschi, S., and Riva, M., "Evaluation of the
     phsychophysiological functions in humans exposed to trichloro-
     ethylene."  Br. J. Ind. Med. 28. 293-95, 1971.

32.   Kleinfeld, M., and Tabershaw, I. R., "Trichloroethylene toxicity—
     Report  of five fatal cases,"  Arch. Ind. Hyg. Occup. Med. 10,
     134-41, 1954.

33.   Secchi, G.C., Chiappino, G. Lotto, A. and Zurlo, N.,  "Actual
     chemical composition of the commercial trichloroethylenes and
     their liver toxicity.  Clinical and enzymological studies,"
     Med. Lav. 59, 486-97, 1968.

34.   James,  W. R. L., "Fatal addiction to trichloroethylene,"  Brit.
     J. Ind. Med. 20. 47-49, 1963.

35.   St. Hill, C. A., "Occupation as a cause of sudden death," Trans.
     Soc. Occup. Med. 16. 6-9, 1966.

36.   Bell, A., "Death from trichloroethylene in a dry cleaning estab-
     lishment," N.Z. Med. J. 50. 119-26, 1951.

37.   Joron,  G. E., Cameron, D. G., and Halpenny, G. W., "Massive necrosis
     of the liver due to trichloroethylene," Con. Med. Ass. J. 73.
     890-91, 1955.

38.   Mitchell, A. B. S., and Parsons-Smith, B. G.,  "Trichloroethylene
     neuropathy,"  Br. Med. J. 1. 422-23, 1969.

                                  59

-------
39.  Tomasini, M.,  and Sartorelli, E., "Chronic intoxication from com-
     mercial trielin inhalation with compromise of the eighth cranial
     nerves,"  Med. Lav. 62, 277-80, 1971.

40.  Todd, J., "Trichloroethylene poisoning with paranoid psychosis
     and lilliputian hallucinations," Br.  Med.  J. 7,  439-40, 1954.

41.  Baronicek, V., and Soucek, B., "The metabolism of trichloro-
     ethylene in rabbits,"  Arch. Gerverbepator Gerverbehyg. 17, 283-
     93, 1954.

42.  Fabre, R. , and Truhaut, R., "Contribution  to the study of tri-
     chloroethylene toxicology—II.  Results of experimental studies
     in animals,"  Brit. J. Ind. Med. 9. 39-43, 1952.

43.  Adams, E. M.,  Spencer, H. C., Rowe, V. K., McCollister, D. D.,
     and Irish, D.  D., "Vapor toxicity of trichloroethylene determined
     by experiments on laboratory animals,"  Arch. Ind. Hyg. Occup. Med.
     4_, 469-81, 1951.

44.  Prendergast, J. A., Jones, R. A.; Jenkins, L. J. Jr.; and Siegel, J.,
     Effects on experimental animals of long-term inhalation of tri-
     chloroethylene, carbon tetrachloride,  1,1,1 - trichloroethane,
     dichlorodifluoromethane and 1,1 - dichloroethylene."  Toxicol.
     Appl. Pharmacol 10;270-89, 1967.

45.  Cagianelli, M. A., Menchini, G., Menchini, G. F., and Bianchi, F.,
     "Histological and humoral aspects of chronic experimental tri-
     chloroethylene intoxicantions,"  Boll. Soc. Med. - Chir Pisa 33.
     558-70,  (1965).

46.  Wirtschafter,  Z. T., and Cronyn, M. W., "Relative hepatotoxicity—
     pentane, trichloroethylene, benzene and carbon tetrachloride."
     Arch. Environ Health 9. 180-85, 1964.

47.  Barrett, H. M., Mackean, D. L., and Cunningham,  J. G., "A compari-
     son of the toxicity of carbon tetrachloride and  trichloroethy-
     lene."  J. Ind. Hyg. & Toxicol. 20. 360-79, 1938.

48.  Seifter, J., "Liver injury in dogs exposed to trichloroethylene."
     J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol 26. 250-52, 1944.

49.  Kylin, B., Sumegi, I., and Yllner, S., "Hepatotoxicity of in-
     haled trichloroethylene and tetrachloroethylene  — long term
     exposure,"  Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol.  22, 379-85, 1965.
                                  60

-------
50.  Mosinger, M.,  and Fiorentini, H.., "Hepatic, renal, lymphatic and
     splenic reactions in experimental trichloroethylene intoxication
     In cats,"  Compt. rend, soc. biol. 149. 150-52, 1955.

51.  Viallier, J.,  and Casanova, F.,  "Transaminase levels in the blood
     of trichloroethylene-treated rats and rabbits,"  Compt. Rend.
     Soc. Biol. 159. 221]-21, 1965.

52.  Savic, S. M.,  and Baaske, H., "Biochemical changes in rabbit eyes
     in trichloroethylene poisoning,"  Albrecht von Graefes Arch.
     Kin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 175, 1-6, 1968.

53.  Zadorozhnyi, B. V.,  "Changes in animals in the case of chronic
     inhalation of  trichloroethylene in low concentrations,"  Gig.
     Tr. Prof. Zabol. 17. 55-57, 1973.

54.  Shmuter, L. M.,  "Effect of chronic action of small concentrations
     of chlorinated hydrocarbons on the production of various classes
     of immunoglogulins,"  Gig Sonit 37, 36-40, 1972.

55.  Mikiskora, H., Mikiska, A.,  "Trichloroethanol in trichloroethy-
     lene poisoning,"  Brit. J. Ind. Med. 23. 116-25, 1966.

56.  Desoille, H.,  Pinchon, R. A., Lille, F., and Bourguignon, A.,
     "Sequelae of acute intoxication by solvents—Importance of elec-
     troencepholography,"  Arch. Mol. Prof. 23, 5-17, 1962.

57.  Desoille, H.,  Pinchon, R. A., Jons, M., and Bourguigon, A.,
     "Acute experimental trichloroethylene intoxication—aggravating
     effects of associated chronic alcoholism,"  Arch. Mol. Prof. 23.
     653-64, 1962.

58.  Battig, K., and Grandjean, E., "Chronic effects of trichloro-
     ethylene on rat behavior—Effects on swimming performance, ex-
     ploratory behavior, and maze and avoidance learning,"  Arch.
     Environ. Health 7. 694-99, 1963.

59.  Grandjean, E., "The effects of short exposures to trichloro-
     ethylene on swimming performances and motor activity of rats,"
     Am. Ind. Hyg.  Assoc. J 24. 376-79, 1963.

60.  Carpenter, C.  P., Smyth, H. F. Jr., and Pozzani, 0. C., "The
     assay of acute vapor toxicity, and the grading and interpretation
     of results on  ninety-six chemical compounds,"  J. Ind. Hyg.
     Toxicol. 31. 343-346 (1949).

61.  Bernard!, L.,  Penzani, B., and Luvoni, R., "Histologic researches
     on the rabbit  brain in trichloroethylene intoxication," Ras.
     Med. Ind. 25.  269-276, 1956.

                                  61

-------
62.  McConnell, G.,  Ferguson, D. M., and Pearson, C. R., "Clorinated
     Hydrocarbons and the Environment" Endeavor 34, 13-18 (1975).

63.  Elkins, H. B.,  Holby, A. K., and Fuller, J. E.,  "The determination
     of atmospheric  contaminants—I.  Organic halogen compounds,"
     J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 19. 474-85, 1937.

64.  Lugg, G. A.,  "Fujiwara reaction and determination of carbon
     tetrachloride,  chloroform, tetrachloroethane and trichloroethy-
     lene in air,"  Med. J. Aust. 38. 1532-36, 1966.

65.  Campbell, E. E., Milligan, M. F., and Miller, H. M.,  "Evaluation
     of methods for  the determination of halogenated hydrocarbons in
     air,"  Am. Ind. Hyg. Ass. J. 20. 138-41, 1959.

66.  Peterson, J. E., Hoyle, H. R., and Schneider, E. J.,  "The analysis
     of air for halogenated hydrocarbon contaminants by means of
     absorption on silica gel,"  Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. Q 17. 429-33,
     1956.

67.  Cook, W. A., and Coleman, A. L.,  "Determination of injurious con-
     stituents in industrial atmospheres—II.  Determination of
     solvent vapors  in air by means of activated charcoal,"  J. Ind.
     Hyg. Toxicol.  18. 194-210, 1936.

68.  Reid, F. H., and Halpin, W. R.,  "Determination of halogenated and
     aromatic hydrocarbons in air by charcoal tube and gas chromoto-
     graphy,"  Am.  Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 29, 390-96, 1968.

69.  Kupel, R. E.,  and White, L. D.,  "Report on a modified charcoal
     tube,"  Am. Ind. Hyg. Ass. J. 32. 456, 1971.

70.  Schaffer, A. W., and Hoyle, H. R.,  "Nine years' experience with the
     Davis Halide meter,"  Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 22. 93-96, 1961.

71.  Saltzman, B.,   "Direct reading colorimetric indicators," Amer-
     ican Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists;  Air
     Sampling Instruments for Evaluation of Atmospheric Contaminants,
     fourth edition,  Cincinnati, Ohio, pp 51-510 & 528, 1972. '

72.  Whitman, N. E., and Johnston, A. E.,  "Sampling and analysis of aro-
     matic hydrocarbon vapors in air:  A gas-liquid chromatographic
     method,"  Am.  Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 25. 464-69, 1964.

73.  White, L. D.,  Taylor, D. G., Mauer, P. A., and Kupel, R. E.,  "A
     Convenient optimized method for the analysis of selected solvent
     vapors in the industrial atmosphere,"  Am. Ind. Hyg. Ass. J. 31,
     225-32, 1970.
                                  62

-------
74.   Urone, P., and Smith., J. E.,  "Analysis of chlorinated hydrocarbons
     with the gas chromatograph,"  Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 22, 36-41,
     1961.

75.   Seltzer. R. J., "Reactions Grow to Trichloroethylene Alert,"
     Chemical and Engineering News,  41-43, May 19, 1975.

76.   Moolenar, R. (Dow Chemical Company), personal communication,
     July 1975.

77.   White, D. C., and Dundas, C. R.,  "Effect of anesthetics on emission
     of light by luminous bacteria,"  Nature 226. 456-8, 1970.

78.   Musinu, C., Caboni, F. , and Pittoni, L.,  "Effect of some halo-
     genated anesthetics on the orotracheal flora,"  Minerva Anes-
     tesiol. 35. 1021-3, 1969.

79.   Horton, J. N., Sussman, M., and Mushin, W. W.,  "Antibacterial
     action of anesthetic vapors,"  Brit. J. Anaesth. 42, 483-7, 1970.

80.   Smithsonian Science Information Exchange.

81.   Lovelock, J. E.,  "Atmospheric halocarbons and stratospheric
     ozone,"  Nature 252. 292-294, 1974.

82.   Grimsrud, E. P., and Rasmussen, R. A.,  "Survey and analysis of
     halocarbons in the atmosphere by gas chromatography-mass spec-
     trometry,"  (1975) in preparation.  (Personal communication from
     R. Moolenar, Dow Chemical Company, July 1975).

83.   Sittig, M., Pollution Control in the Organic Chemical Industry,
     208,  C1974).

84.   Turner, D. G.,  Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates, U.S.
     Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Revised, 1969.

85.   Grandjean, E., Munchinger, R., Turrian, V., Haas, P. A., Knoep-
     fel,  H. K., and Rosenmund, H.,  "Investigation into the effects of
     exposure  to trichloroethylene in mechanical engineering,"  Br.
     J. Ind. Med 12. 131-42, 1955.

86.   Ahlmark, A., Gerhardsson, G., and Holm, A., "Trichloroethylene
     exposure  in Swedish engineering workshops," Proceedings of
     the XlVth  International Congress on Occupational Health, Madrid,
     September  1963, pp 448-50.
                                  63

-------
87.  Stock, V.  T., Jr., Forrest, D. E., and Wahl, K. K., "Determination
     of trichloroethylene in air,"  Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 22, 184-
     86,  1961.

88.  Anonymous, Washington Post, July 17, 1975.

89.  Skinner, J. B.,  "Control of health hazards in the operation of
     metal degreasers,"  Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. Quart 13, 11-16, 1952.

90.  Kempner, S. K., E. N. Seller, and D. H. Bowman,  "Performance of
     commercially available equipment in scrubbing hydrogen chlorid
     gas," J. of the Air Pollution Control Association, Volume 20,
     No.  3, pg. 139-143.

91.  Dyer, J.,  and J. W. Wett, "Scrubber collects HC1 and other pollu-
     tants,1' Chemical Processing, January 1969.

92.  U.S.  Dept. of Health Education and Welfare, J. A. Danielson,
     editor—Air Pollution Engineering Manual, 1967.
                                  64

-------
                                  TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                           (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
 REPORT NO.
 MTR-7142
                                                          3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION-NO.
 TITLE AND SUBTITLE

 Air Pollution Assessment of Trichloroethylene
                             5. REPORT DATE
                              February  1976
                                                          6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
 AUTHOR(S)

 B. B. Fuller
                                                          8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS


 The Mitre  Corporation
 McLean, Virginia  22101
                                                          10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
                             11 CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                                            68-02-1495
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  U.  S.  Environmental Protection  Agency
  Office of Air and Waste Management
  Office of Air Quality Planning  and Standards
  Research Triangle Park, North Carolina  27711
                             13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                               Final      	
                             14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE


                               EPA-AWM
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
       Trichloroethylene  is  an  organic solvent primarily used  for  the vapor
  degreasing of metals.   Approximately 200,000 industrial workers  are exposed
  to this solvent annually.   Although the major physiological  response in
  humans from acute or chronic  exposure to trichloroethylene is  central  nervous
  system depression, damage  to  liver, kidney and heart  have also been reported.
  Since the metabolic fate and  toxic effects of trichloroethylene  are similar
  in many mammalian species  to  those in man, the fact that this  compound has
  recently been implicated as a potent liver carcinogen in mice  may be of
  significance.
       Approximately 60%  of  the total world production  of trichloroethylene is
  released to the environment each year.  However, due  to its  low  water solubility,
  high vapor pressure and-high  atmospheric photodegradation rate,  trichloroethylene
  is not expected to persist in the environment.  Ambient concentrations in the
  atmosphere of industrialized  areas are only about  16  ppt.  Proper use of local
  exhaust systems in conjunction with vapor condensation appratus  and good
  general ventilation should be sufficient to maintain  levels  of trichloroethylene
  in the workshop environment well below the recommended 100 ppm and to insure
  a minimum release to the ambient atmosphere.
17.
                               KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                             b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                                           c. cos AT i Field/Group
 Organic Compounds
 Organic Solvents
 Physiological Effects
 Industrial Plants
 Air Pollution Control
 Stationary Sources
Hydrocarbons
Carcinogens
Air Pollution
18 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
  Unlimited
                 19 SECURITY CLASS (This Report!
                  Unclassified
                                                                        21 NO OF PAGES
                                                                          70
                                              20 SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                               Unclassified
                                                                        22 PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
                                            65

-------
                                                     INSTRUCTIONS

1.   REPORT NUMBER
     Insert the EPA report number as it appears on the cover of the publication.

2.   LEAVE BLANK

3.   RECIPIENTS ACCESSION NUMBER
     Reserved for use by each report recipient

4.   TITLE AND SUBTITLE
     Title should indicate clearly and briefly the subject coverage of the report, and be displayed prominently  Set subtitle, if used, in smaller
     type or otherwise subordinate it to main title. When a report is prepared in more than one volume, repeat the primary title, add volume
     number and include subtitle for the specific title.

5.   REPORT DATE
     Each report shall carry a date indicating at least  month and year  Indicate the basis on which it was selected (e g , date of issue,  date of
     approval, date of preparation, etc ).

6.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
     Leave blank.

7.   AUTHOR(S)
     Give name(s) in conventional order (John R Doe, J. Robert Doe, etc.).  List author's affiliation if it differs from the performing organi-
     zation.

8.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NUMBER
     Insert if performing organization wishes to assign this number

9.   PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
     Give name, street, city, state, and ZIP code. List no more than two levels of an organizational hirearchy

10.  PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
     Use the program element number under which the report was prepared.  Subordinate numbers may be included in parentheses.

11.  CONTRACT/GRANT NUMBER
     Insert contract or grant number under which report was prepared

12.  SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
     Include ZIP code.

13.  TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
     Indicate interim final, etc., and if applicable, dates covered.

14.  SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
     Leave blank

15.  SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
     Enter information not included elsewhere but useful,  such as  Prepared  in cooperation with, Translation of,  Presented at conference of,
     To be published in, Supersedes, Supplements, etc

16.  ABSTRACT
     Include a brief (200 words or less) factual summary of the most significant information contained in the report  If the report contains a
     significant bibliography or literature survey ..mention it here.

17.  KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
     (a) DESCRIPTORS - Select from the Thesaurus  of Engineering and Scientific Terms the proper authorized terms that  identify the major
     concept of the research and,are sufficiently specific and precise to be used as index entries for cataloging

     (b) IDENTIFIERS AND OPEN-ENDED TERMS - Use identifiers for project names, code names, equipment designators, etc  Use open-
     ended terms written in descriptor form for those subjects for which no descriptor exists

     (c) COS ATI FIELD GROUP - Field and group assignments are to be taken from the 1965 COSATI Subject Category List Since the ma-
     jority of documents are multidisciplinary in nature, the Primary Field/Group assignment(s) will  be specific discipline, area of human
     endeavor, or type of physical object: The application(s) will be cross-referenced with secondary Field/Group assignments that will follow
     the primar> postmg(s).

18.  DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
     Denote releasability to the public or limitation for reasons other than security for example "Release Unlimited." Cite any availability to
     the public, with address  and price.

19. &20. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION
     DO NOT submit classified reports to the National Technical Information service.

21.  NUMBER OF PAGES
     Insert the total number of pages, including this one and unnumbered pages, but exclude.distribution list, if any.

22.  PRICE
     Insert the price set by the National Technical Information Service or the Government Printing Office if known
    EPA Form 222O-1 (9-73) (Reveru)

-------