Pollution-
Caused
Fish
Kills
in 1965
U.S. DEPARTMENT

OF THE INTERIOR

Federal Water Pollution
Control Administration

-------
X

                                   I
                                  i

-------
Pollution
Caused
Fish
Kills
in 1965
SIXTH ANNUAL REPORT
FEDERAL
WATER
POLLUTION
CONTROL
ADMINISTRATION
Basic Data Program

Washington, D.C.2O2O3

-------
                                       CONTENTS
                      WP-12
   Formerly Public Health Service Publication No. 847 (Revised)
                     (1965 Edition)


For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
             Washington, D.G., 20402 - Price 25 cents
                                                         Payt

Foreword	   iii

Analysis	    1

Quotes from Field Reports	    2

Comments on Tables	    5

Table 1. Historical  summary of pollution-caused  fish
         kills,  June 1960-December  1965	    7
Table  2. Pollution-caused fish-kill summary by State	    8

Table  3. Fish kill summary by source of pollution	    9

Table  4. Summary of fish kills by operations subgroup	   10

Table  5. Fish kill summary by type of water body	   10

Table  6. Fish kill summary by type of water	   11

Table  7. Fish kill summary by month	   11

Table  8. Fish kill summary by severity of kill	   11

Table  9. Distribution of duration by severity of kill	   11

Table  10. Fish kill summary by degree of severity	   12

Table  11. Frequency distribution of reported duration of
          critical  effects  (number of reports  showing
          kills lasting indicated number of  days)	   12


Figure I. Report of Pollution-Caused Fish Kill (form)__   13

Cumulative Listing of Reports  Received as of  Date of
  Tabulation	   14

-------
       FOREWORD
       This report of pollution-caused fish kills reflects the in-
vestigation of 531 separate kills documented by State officials
in 1965.  Forty-four States reported that 11%  million fish
were lost because of pollution.
       This study and reporting program were developed  in
cooperation with the State agencies responsible for fisheries
management  and the U. S.  Fish and Wildlife Service. It was
designed to establish centrally a  new series of statistics on
water  pollution cause and effect.  If the sources and kinds  of
fish killing substances are revealed, greater care on the part
of individuals responsible for disposal of specific toxic agents
will come about.
       Many  fish kills occur that are unobserved or are not
reported to State officials.  Obviously, no kills occur in water
that cannot support fish life. For these and other reasons, the
report cannot  be considered a perfect record  of biological
hazard.  Nevertheless,  contaminants  that  kill  fish  may en-
danger wildlife, domestic livestock,  irrigated crops, and even
sources of drinking water supply.
       In  every  State,  significant pollution-caused fish  kills
are reported  to State agencies by fishermen or other citizens
who discover them. The kills are then evaluated by technically
trained State officials if they can get on the scene before evi-
dence is dissipated by current or wind action.
       For many reasons, there is a great variation in the de-
tails of the  reports  received.   In  some  States, considerable
information is  reported on all kills. This is especially true in
States where damage  claims are made for  fish lost.  In other
cases, reports are general.
       The Federal Water  Pollution Control  Administration
has not asked State agencies to change their investigative pro-
cedures because each has adopted a pattern  suitable to its own
authority  and  responsibility.  It  does, however,  request  all
States to submit a report on each fish  kill as it is brought to
their attention.  Postage-free report forms are supplied to the
States for this purpose.

       The annual report is published in the spring each year
and  is distributed to  cooperating agencies and organizations,
and to individuals requesting it.
       The Federal Water  Pollution Control  Administration
expresses  its appreciation  for  the  cooperation of the State.
agencies and individuals that make possible the development
of these valuable statistics.
                                                                                                                    iii

-------
IV

-------
      Analysis
      Of more than 11,750,000 fish reported killed by pollu-
tion in United States waters during 1965, over half were killed
as a  result of  pollution from municipalities;  industry  ac-
counted for one third; and agricultural operations were next
in line.
      The average  number of fish killed was about 4,000.
This excludes  as unrepresentative  16 cases where the number
was 100,000 or more. The full list of these major kills follows:
Lake or Stream
Wethersfield Cove
Blanchard River
Big Turkey Creek
Cachuma Lake
Woodcock Creek
Arkansas River
Valley Creek
/
Coralville
Reservoir
Maumee River
Crane Creek
Spring Creek
North Raccoon River
Sangamon R. S. Fork
W. Branch
Susquehanna
Jordan Creek
Sandusky River
Number Fish
Near or In Killed
Wethersfield, Conn.
Hancock Co., Ohio
Waukomis, Okla.
Santa Barbara, Calif.
Saegertown East, Pa.
Dodge City, Ark.
Bessemer, Ala.

Coralville, Iowa

Lucas Co., Ohio
Ottawa Co., Ohio
Caledonia, N.Y.
Lake-Sac Cities, Iowa
Kincaid, 111.
Jersey Shores, Pa.

Fairmount, Illinois
Sandusky Co., Ohio
3,000,000
1,245,374
1,200,080
600,600
600,038
500,000
469,500

400,000

361,418
278,968
200,000
200,000
146,902
125,000

107,145
105,522
Operation
Sewage disposal
Sewage disposal
Petroleum
Water System
Poisons
Manure drainage
Combination of
industries
Paper and allied
products
Sewage disposal
Food products
Petroleum
Sewage disposal
Pipeline
Mining

Chemicals
Sewage disposal
       In many cases, both major and minor, the causes were
negligence, carelessness, or ignorance.  There are many in-
stances of  broken pipelines, careless spraying of pesticides,
and washing poisonous solutions from  tanks  and other con-
tainers.  In some cases, fish kills are  permitted to recur time
and again,  as when an industrial plant or municipality  treats
its waste inadequately or not at all, or when acid continues to
flow from a coal mine.
       In this category belongs a case where two to four mil-
lion alewives were killed  in a  cove as the result of a  heavy
sewage outflow from one of Connecticut's largest cities. Dur-
ing a heavy rain the untreated sewage overflowed into a storm
drain entering the cove. Sea gulls feasted for days on the baby
alewives or herrings, two to four inches long.
       In many  instances, the  investigator fails to  find any
specific cause for a fish kill; in  other  instances, it takes many
weeks  of hard work to come up with the cause. One of the
largest and most mysterious fish kills of  the year took place
in the  Ashley River near Charleston,  South Carolina. Assist-
ance in finding the causes was provided by a team of Federal
investigators from the Robert A. Taft Sanitary  Engineering
Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.  They found that a phosphate com-
pound,  anticholinesterase, used  in manufacturing pesticides,
was one of the prime toxic  agents. As a result, a Charleston
chemical company agreed to change its waste disposal system,
but it is worth noting that the report did  not place full  blame
on any one industry.  It  observed that, of the  10 industrial
                                                                                                                 1

-------
plants which discharge waste into the river, "only one industry
has effective waste control procedures in operation."
       Such a finding—the attribution of a fish kill to a com-
bination of circumstances—is fairly common.  When 800,000
pounds of fish were lost on the Iowa River, an official of the
State Conservation Commission was forced to  conclude that
the kill "was caused by a combination  of factors, including
pollution from industrial and municipal wastes, low river flow,
and heavy ice conditions."
       In  1965, as in previous years, local newspapers carried
numerous reports of these disasters under such headlines as
"Damages in Fish Kill Are Tallied." "100,000 Fish Die; Albion
Firm Cited."  "Thousands  of Dead  Fish Close 4 Miles  of
Beaches."  "10,000  Fish  Killed in Heuvelton Area." "Severe
Fish Kill  in Area."  "2 Del. Fish Kills Laid to Farm Chemi-
cals." "City Probes Dead Fish in Creek."  "State Studies Claim
60,185 Fish Killed."
      When a steel products company accidentally poured
600 gallons of zinc cyanide into the Kalamazoo  River, killing
an estimated 45,000 bass and 55,000 carp, suckers, and  bull-
head, two  State agencies took prompt action.  The Michigan
State Water  Resources Commission ordered  the company to
build facilities that would provide for complete  abatement of
its wastes by the end of the year, and the State Conservation
Department ordered payment be made for the game fish killed.
       The  primary  responsibility for such  reporting  rests
 with the States.  The success of the activity depends on com-
 pleteness of reporting by State fish and game agencies.  They
 report the kills on a form (see Page 13) which lists date, loca-
 tion, cause, number, and types of fish killed, miles of streams
 or areas of lake affected, duration of critical effect, and  addi-
 tional remarks.  Since these additional  remarks  sometimes
 have a greater impact than cold statistics, some are printed
 here in much the same form that they were submitted.
                            85

       A 5,000 gallon truck and trailer load of phenol wa's
wrecked, with most of the phenol entering the lake. The kill
occurred 12 hours later.  Species affected were rainbow trout,
brown trout, large mouth bass, threadfin shad, bluegill, green
sunfish, sucker, squawfish, carp and brown bullhead. An esti-
mated 10,000 fish were killed.
      A heavy rain caused the mill's stabilization lagoon to
overflow, thus' flushing "bad" water from the lagoon and pol-
luted areas of the creek into a section of the creek inhabited
by fish.  An estimated 450 pounds of fish were lost.
      Quotes  from Field Reports
      The reporting of pollution-caused fish kills was begun
June 1, 1960,  in an  attempt to obtain additional information
on the effects of pollutants discharged to surface waters. This
activity is being  conducted by the Federal Water Pollution
Control Administration. Previously it had been performed by
the Division of Water Supply and Pollution Control, an agency
of the U. S. Public Health Service.
      This kill of two to four million fish indicates a need to
correct sewage flow so that  it does not overflow  into storm
drain above cove.  Secondary treatment desirable.
      Organic  material from a citrus processing plant Was
not sufficiently  decomposed by the plant's filtering system be-
fore entering the river,  hence a  high  biochemical  oxygen
demand and oxygen depletion. (8,700 pounds—approximately
15,000 fish.)

-------
      A farmer  piled his wheat and  oats along the stream
and sprayed the pile with dieldrin.  There was iy2 inch rain,
and some of the material was washed into the stream. (2,200
fish.)
      This was a severe winter loss resulting from improper
or untreated sewage.  Owing  to duration  of  kill, we have
probably lost all fish for a 40-mile reach of the river. (200,000
fish.)
      When  a  frozen food locker plant  was dismantled, the
contractor drained two drums of ammonia from the refrigera-
tion unit into the creek. (11,000 fish.)

                           
-------
       Kill confined to lower reaches of stream, where it flows
through a  residential area.  Water sample revealed 2.5 parts
per billion dieldrin.  Other compounds also present in concen-
trations of less than 0.25 parts per billion.  Quite possible that
at least some of these chemicals originated from residential
users — positive checks in this regard were not feasible. (More
than 1,000 fish.)
       The brackets broke on a truck applying liquid fertilizer
to a corn field and the tank rolled into the stream. An esti-
mated 10 gallons of the liquid spilled into the creek, killing
2,000 fish.
      An industrial worker  accidentally turned some wrong
valves and dumped about 300 gallons of cyanide solution into
a tank which ruptured and  allowed  some of the  solution to
drain into the stream. Most  of the fish killed were minnows.
(15,000 fish.)
      A golf course was sprayed by a commercial sprayer to
control  mosquitos.  Some  of the materials  (DDT and mala-
thion) reached the stream. (4,000 fish.)
      This fish  kill started immediately downstream from a
sewage  treatment plant outfall. Apparently something toxic
passed through the treatment plant.  Almost all algae in the
stream  were killed.  Laboratory tests  of a sample  showed
presence of copper and phenols, used to control algae in the
cooling towers. (500 fish.)
                                                                   Detergent  waste  products stored  in  an  abandoned
                                                             quarry were pumped into brook and killed 2,000 smelt.
      A copper valve on a cyanide vat failed owing to corro-
sion.  About 200 pounds of cyanide entered municipal sewer
system,  passed through an overloaded treatment plant, and
entered the stream.  (2,000 fish.)
       Fertilizer plant discharged effluent with high ammonia
concentration into river.  Flash flood occurring when river was
low  flushed out river bed and caused kill.  Water samples
showed up to 30 parts per million ammonia concentrates two
days  after kill.  New plant  owners  promise cooperation  to
prevent recurrence of situation.  (18,000 fish).
       Kill caused by inclusion of industrial wastes with vil-
lage sanitary sewage. Treatment inadequatexfor toxic com-
ponents of industrial waste. (10,000-15,000 fish.)
      Rupture of tank semitrailer resulted in  loss of 1,400
gallons of 6 pounds per gallon toxaphene concentrate at plant
site. River water samples were found to have as much as 8 to
10 parts per billion.  Gas and thin layer chromatography proc-
esses used for testing.  Fish tissues had content of 25 to  60
parts per billion.  Kill area extended several miles.  (30,000-
35,000 fish.)
      Acid spilled in an industrial plant drained into a tribu-
tary.  Early detection of spill and corrective measures taken
to neutralize the acid helped to hold the fish kill to a minimum.
Bottom of stream was covered with suspected iron particles.
Water appeared reddish brown in damage zone. (10,000 fish.)

-------
       Pesticides were applied by plane to a field one quarter
of a mile southeast of lake.  Drift carried powder over lake.
Large mouth bass, channel catfish, carp, threadfin shad, green
sunfish, and bluegill were affected.  Dead and dying small fish
observed for 10 days. Up to  1,500 gulls fed on these fish dur-
ing this time.  (9,360 fish.)
      Fuel  oil from a  broken pipeline  killed 142,902 fish
valued at $21,249.52.
      Two  industries involved.  Tile company had a break-
down in fuel oil furnace; oil saturated floor and drained into
creek.  Electric materials company allowed copper sediment
and oil from rollers and air conditioning to enter same stream.
All fish and aquatic life killed in tributary from point of pollu-
tion  of main stream, a distance of 16 miles. Copper sediment
on stream bed.
       Polishing and plating company cleaned and flushed its
plating tank. Aquatic life also killed. (2,000 fish.)
      Drainage from this farmer's silo has been seeping into
stream and killing fish for years. He has a poor situation
because underlying slate deposits  prohibit digging a  catch
basin for seepage.  Now farmer plans to line with pipe and
remove seepage to higher ground  away from stream.  Craw-
fish, water worms  and other aquatic life killed,  as  well  as
500 fish.
       Comments  on  Tables

       HISTORICAL SUMMARY
       A total of 11,784,000 fish were reported killed by pollu-
tion during 1965. The fact that this figure is less than 1961
and 1964 is no indication of a trend; it probably indicates dif-
ferences in the extent of reporting rather than differences in
the number of fish killed.
       Of the 531 reports received, 446 gave the number of fish
killed. The remaining 85 said, "thousands", "many hundreds,"
"pounds",  or  some other unquantifiable number, or left the
question unanswered.
       Thus, the number of fish killed is at best an estimate.
However,  some States have developed elaborate and carefully
worked out methods for  arriving at a figure.  The number as
given, or mid-point of a range, is used throughout this report.
No artificial degree of accuracy is implied by this procedure.
       Six  States submitted no reports. Only 339 reports indi-
cated the extent of water damaged. They reported 1,300 miles
of stream involved, 4,630 acres of lake or bay, and 20 miles of
shore line.

      SOURCE OF POLLUTION
       Industry was responsible for the fish kills in 241 (or 45
percent) of the 531 cases reported. The number of fish killed
was one-third of the total. Municipal operations accounted for
only a fourth of the reports, but was responsible for over half
(52  percent) of the fish. Agricultural operation was third in
both categories. Transportation and miscellaneous operations
each created 5 percent of the reports but were responsible for
only a negligible number of fish killed.
      The  average size of kill in 1965 was 4,310, the smallest in
any  of the  last 5 years' full reporting. This average, and the
average for each of the sources, was  derived after the 16 re-
ports of fish kills over 100,000 were  eliminated as being un-
   221-391 O -6« - 2

-------
representative.  Although  transportation operations was  re-
sponsible for a relatively small total of fish killed, its average
kill amounted to nearly 8,000, by far the largest of the five
groups. Industrial pollution was second, at 5,230. Agriculture
and municipal sources gave average kills of between  3,000 and
3,500,  while  the miscellaneous group averaged slightly over
1,000.
       The total  figure  of  11,784,000  fish killed during 1965
was reached  by  assuming that those reports of kills where no
numbers were given did in fact kill as many as the average.

       SUMMARY BY OPERATIONS SUBGROUP
       Sewage disposal  activities, either through malfunction
or overloading,  accounted  for almost half the number of fish
killed during 1965.  Petroleum operations, including  well drill-
ing and refining, was next in toxicity, killing 1,500,000 fish.
Agricultural  operations was the third most potent killer with
770,000 victims.

       TYPES OF FISH KILLED
       Only seventy-four percent of the respondents  answered
the question concerning  the breakdown between game and non-
game fish.  On the basis of the percentages they gave (13 per-
cent game, 87 percent non-game), the total kill of 11,784,000
indicates that 1,409,000 were game fish and 10,375,000 were
non-game fish.

      SUMMARY BY TYPE OF WATER
      As indicated  in Table 5, 85  percent  of the fish were
killed in rivers and streams. Of the 4,630 acres of lakes that
were polluted, two reports accounted for 4,000 acres  (1,000
acres in California,  with  600,600  fish killed, and  3,000 acres
in Arkansas, with no number of dead fish given).

      SUMMARY BY MONTH
      As indicated  in Table 6, the greatest number of kills
during  1965 took place in  August,  but the deaths were highest
in September, January, October and July, in that  order.

      SEVERITY OF KILLS
      The remaining  tables show the  severity of kills and
their duration.

-------
                             Table 1—Historical summary of pollution-caused fish kills, June 1960-December 1965


Number of States reporting
Number of reports
Reports which state number of fish killed
Total estimated number of fish killed
Average size of kill2
Largest kill reported
Reports where extent of area affected
was stated
A. River
Number of reports
Miles of stream
B. Lakes and reservoirs
Number of reports
Acres affected
Average duration of kill in days
June-December
I960
36
286
149
6,379,000'
2,925
5,000,000



189
1,204

25
1,407
2.95

1961
45
411
263
15,910,000l
6,535
5,387,000



240
1,686

50
5,967
2.64

1962
37
381
233
7,118,000l
5,710
3,180,000



259
1,448

25
2,581
2.59

1963
38
436
300
7,860,000
7,775
2,000,000



271
2,203

49
5,644
3.18

1964
40
485
385
18,387,000
5,490
7,887,000



339
1,440

57
12,637
2.44

1965
44
531
446
11,784,000
4,310
3,000,000



292
1,300

38
4,630
2.57
1 After adjustment for reports giving two or mote causes.
2 Excludes reports of  100,000 or more as being unrepresentative; this number does not exceed 16 reports in any one year.

-------
Table 2—Pollution-caused fish kill summary by State

Alabama
Arkansas
California
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
New Hampsire
New Jersey
New York
North Carolina
Ohio
Oklahoma
Total
number of
reports
14
4
10
5
2
3
8
1
1
13
16
7
6
1
35
5
4
7
7
4
2
13
3
7
5
27
25
6
94
5
Reporting number of fish
killed
Number
of reports
10
2
9
4
1
3
1
1
1
13
16
6
6
—
34
3
2
7
7
2
—
11
3
6
4
27
24
6
94
3
Number
of fish
482,871
1,500
718,960
3,013,436
10,000
45,115
5,000
1,000
1,250
402,967
80,000
601,550
570,500
—
108,100
12,000
33,200
12,850
6,449
2,000
—
42,450
1,400
37,832
12,950
53,855
332,647
22,787
2,378,255
1,202,580
Extent of damage
Miles of river
Number
of reports
9
1
—
2
1
2
6
1
1
10
15
2
6
1
30
4
1
2
2
4
1
10
3
3
4
10
18
3
—
3
Miles
52
3
—
3
1
28
54
1
1
81
48
43
89
3
89
42
4
6
4
28
30
41
8
24
11
27
42
9
—
41
Acres of lake
Number
of reports
1
1
5
1
—
—
—
—
—
1
1
—
—
—
4
—
1
—
—
—
—
2
—
1
— •
8
—
2
—
—
Acres
9
3,000
1,111
1
—
—
—
—
—
10
2
—
—
—
25
—
6
—
—
—
—
31
—
3
—
82
—
135
—
—
Miles of shore
Number
of reports
_
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— ,
2
—
—
—
—
Miles
	
—
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
6
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
3
—
—
—
—

-------
                                        Table  2—Pollution-caused fish kill summary by State—Continued




Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Total

Total
number of
reports
14
72
2
1
1
14
57
3
2
4
3
13
2
3
531
Reporting number of fish
killed


Number
of reports
4
66
2
—
—
13
31
3
1
1
3
12
2
2
446


Number
of fish
10,599
944,108
6,000
—
—
37,423
68,931
2,800
500
200
15,600
68,266
44,100
1,408
11,393,439
Extent of damage

Miles of river

Number
of reports
3
68
1
—
—
11
29
3
2
3
3
12
1
1
292
Miles
3
186
3
—
—
76
101
51
23
8
9
20
2
5
1,300
Acres of lake

Number
of reports
1
1
1
—
1
1
3
—
—
—
—
—
—
2
38
Acres
20
1
7
—
3
150
7
—
—
—
—
—
—
27
4,630

Miles of shore

Number
of reports
	
—
—
_'
—
—
4
—
—
—
—
—
1
—
9
Miles
—
—
—
—
—
—
5
—
—
—
—
—
4
—
20
                                          Table 3—Fish kill summary by source of pollution


Source of pollution
Agricultural operations
Industrial operations
Municipal operations
Transportation operations
Other operations
Total

Number of
reports
107
241
135
27
21
531
Reporting number of fish
killed
Number of
reports
93
195
118
21
19
446
Number of fish
1,390,136
3,763,948
5,911,604
306,810
20,941
11,393,439

Average
kill'
3,190
5,230
3,560
7,995
1,100
4,310
Estimated number of fish
killed2
Total
1,435,000
3,999,000
5,972,000
355,000
23,000
11,784,000
Game
232,000
839,000
160,000
168,000
10,000
1,409,000
Non-game
1,203,000
3,160,000
5,812,000
187,000
13,000
10,375,000
Estimated
number of
commercial
value
357,000
1,217,000
25,000
81,000
1,680,000
» Averages derived after excluding 16 reports of 100,000 or more.   .,,,..
2 Includes all fish killed as reported plus the average number lulled for each source applied to those reports where no actual number was given.

-------
                                  Table 4—Summary of fish kills by operations subgroup

Source of pollution
Agricultural operations :.
Insecticides, poisons,
etc.
Fertilizers
Manure-silage drainage
Subtotal

Industrial operations:
Mining
Food and kindred
products
Paper and allied
products
Chemicals
Petroleum
Metals
Combinations
Other
Subtotal


of reports
74
4
29
107


35
60
15
37
25
16
13
40
241

Reporting
Number
of reports
64
4
25
93


33
48
11
31
17
14
10
31
195

number of fish
Number of fish
770,557
2,697
616,882
1,390,136


295,223
536,563
494,860
218,661
1,516,024
73,404
491,681
137,532
3,763,948


Source of pollution
Municipal operations:
Sewerage systems
Refuse disposal
Water systems
Power
Other
QnKf*-i*-1 1

Transportation operations:
Rail
Truck
Barge or boat
Pipeline
Subtotal
Other operations
Total


of reports
104
7
3
2
19

135
6
12
3
6
27
21
531

Reporting i
Number
of reports
92
5
2
2
17

118
2
12
2
5
21
19
446

lumber of fish
Number of fish
5,211,014
17,206
604,300
620
78,464
. .
5,911,604
1,400
105,940
2,050
197,420
306,810
20,941
11,393,439

                                    Table 5—Fish kill summary by type of water body
Type of water body
River
Lake
Bay
Total
Total
number of
reports
459
59
13
531
Reporting number of fish
killed
Number
of reports
391
47
8
446
Number of fish
9,632,687
1,650,752
110,000
11,393,439
Extent of damage
Miles of river
Number
of reports
292
292
Miles
1,300
1,300
Acres of lake
Number
of reports
35
3
38
Acres
4,611
19
4,630
Miles of shore
Number
of reports
2
7
9
Miles
10
10
20
10

-------
Table 6—Fish kill summary by type of water
           Table 8—Fish kill summary by severity of kill
Type of water
Fresh
Salt
Estuary
Total
Total
number
of reports
502
15
14
531
Reporting number of fish killed
Number of
reports
425
9
12
446
Number of
fish
11,255,658
102,121
35,660
11,393,439
   Table 7—Fish kill summary by month

Month

January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Total

Total number
of reports

11
16
14
39
58
80
93
109
67
15
15
14
531
Repotting number of fish killed

Number of
reports
10
13
9
28
46
72
82
95
55
13
13
10
446
Number of fish

1,734,928
487,318
14,059
662,396
224,915
737,030
1,058,605
520,987
4,210,669
1,639,072
57,866
45,594
11,393,439
Severity

Total kill
Heavy kill
Moderate kill
Light kill
Not stated
Total
M umber of
reports

56
139
106
103
127
531
Reporting number of fish killed
Number of
reports
42
115
91
90
108
446
Number of fish

1,044,617
6,366,765
1,500,130
59,930
2,421,997
11,393,439
Average
size of
kilH

7,975
7,810
2,240
665
45140
4,310
1 Average derived after exclusion of 16 reports of 100,000 or more.

        Table 9—Distribution of duration by severity of kill
       (Number of reports, showing kills lasting indicated number of days)
Days
<1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
17
20
25
26
45
Total
Average
All
reports
57
115
65
42
13
11
3
6
—
2
6
1
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
334
2.57
Total
kill
3
12
13
8
2
2
—
2
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
43
2.58
Heavy
kill
13
27
24
11
6
8
2
4
—
—
3
—
1
4
—
1
1
1
1
1
108
3.75
Moderate
kill
9
49
16
11
4
—
—
—
—
1
3
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
94
1.97
Light
kill
31
22
11
11
1
1
1
—
—
1
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
__
—
—
80
1.64
Not
stated
1
5
1
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
9
2.73

-------
     Table 10—Fish kill summary by degree of severity
Source of pollution
Agricultural operations
Industrial operations
Municipal operations
Transportation operations
Other
Total
All
reports
107
241
135
27
21
531
Total ,
kill
8
32
9
3
4
56
Heavy
kill
33
68
27
8
3
139
Moderate
kill
35
35
24
7
5
106
Light
kill
17
46
29
6
5
103
Not
stated
14
60
46
3
4
127
                    Percent of Responses
Agricultural operations
Industrial operations
Municipal operations
Transportation operations
Other
Total
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
7.5
13.3
6.6
11.1
19.0
10.6
30.8
28.2
20.0
29.7
14.4
26.2
32.7
14.6
17.8
25.9
23.8
20.0
15.9
19.1
21.5
22.2
23.8
19.4
13.1
25.0
34.1
11.1
19.0
24.0
Table 11—Frequency distribution of reported duration
                   of critical effects
(Number of reports showing kills lasting indicated number of days)
Days
<1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
17
20
25
26
45
Total
Average
All
reports
57
115
65
42
13
11
3
6
—
2
6
1
1
6
1
1
1
1
1
1
334
2.57
Agri-
cultural
operations
6
37
18
11
3
2
1
—
—
—
3
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
82
2.17
Industrial
operations
28
43
22
15
5
8
2
5
—
1
2
—
—
2
1
1
1
1
1
—
138
2.99
Municipal
operations
16
26
19
12
2
1
—
—
—
1
1
—
—
2
—
—
__
	
—
1
81
2.10
Transportation
operations
4
4
2
3
3
—
—
1
—
—
_ _
—
1
2
—
—
__
	
	
—
20
3.90
Other
opera-
tions
3
5
4
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
__
__
—
—
—
	
_ _
^^_
	
—
13
1.38
12

-------
PHS-3327-l
REV.B-62
         DEPARTMENT OF
HEALTH, EDUCATION, AKD WELFARE
     PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
                        Form Approved
                        Budget Bureau No. 68-R706
                                                                                           (WASHINGTON USE)
REPORT OF POLLUTION-CAUSED  FISH  KILL
1.
LOCATION:
Stream or Lake



State

2. DATE OF KILL:
3. TYPE WATER-

|" 1 Fresh 1 1 Salt 1 1 Estuary
4. SOURCE OF POLLUTION
a.
AGRICULTURAL OPERATIONS
C3 Poisons (Herbicides, pesticides, etc.)
CD Fertilizers
| | Manure drainage, ensilage liquors,
or feed lot operations.
b. INDUSTRIAL OPERATIONS
CD Mining 1 1 Chemicals
CD Food & kindred CD Petroleum
products n M-foU
CD P°l>or & allied
products .
c. MUNICIPAL OPERATIONS
1 1 Sewerage system
CD R»'use disposal
1 1 Water system
CD Swimming pool
d.  TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS
   D  Roll  CD Barge or boat
   C3  Truck CD Pipeline
g.  SPECIFIC AGENT OR CAUSE, IF KNOWN*.
                                           CD Other (specify)
                                                               CD e.  OTHER
                                                               CD '•  UNKNOWN
5.  TYPE OF FISH KILLED
   	% Game
     	% Non-game
     100	% Total
          % Commercial
6.  ESTIMATED NUMBER KILLED	
7.  SEVERITY:
   CD Total    CD  Heavy     CD Moderate    CD  Light
8.  EXTENT: Miles of stream or acres of lake affected	
9.  DURATION  OF CRITICAL EFFECT:	days	hrs.
                                                                                    REPORTING OFFICIAL
                                                                AGENCY MAILING ADDRESS
                                                                                    DATE
10.  ADDITIONAL REMARKS;  (State circumstances of kill; any visible effects of the pollution on water, or other details)
                                                        Figure I.
                                                                                                                  13

-------
         Report  of Pollution-

             Caused Fish  Kills
           Cumulative  Listing of

                 Reports Received

           as  of  Date  of  Listing
OPERATIONS CODES

10  Agricultural Operations
    11   Poisons (Herbicides, Pesticides, etc.)
    12   Fertilizers
    13   Manure, Silo, Feedlot Drainage, etc.

20  Industrial Operations
    21   Mining
    22   Pood & Kindred Products
    23   Paper  & Allied Products
    24   Chemicals
    25   Petroleum
    26   Metals
    27   Combinations
    28   Other

30  Municipal Operations
    31   Sewerage System
    32   Refuse Disposal
    33   Water System
    34   Swimming Pool
    35   Power

40  Transportation Operations
    41   Rail
    42   Truck
    43   Barge  or Boat
    44   Pipe Line

50  Other Operations

90  Unknown (See next table, p. 26)
RIVER OR LAKC
AFFECTED
ALABAMA
TOWN CREEK
VALLFY CRFEK
VALLEY CREEK
CAHABA RIVER
CHATTOOGA RIVER
BASSETT CRFEK
TOMBIGBEE RIVER
TOM6IGBEE RIVER
RABBI CREEK
THREE MILE CREEK
ALABAMA RIVER
SOUGAHATCHEE CRK
HIGH PINE CREEK
BLACK WARRIOR RIV
ARKANSAS
BELCO LAKE
LOST CR-SALINE R
TURTLE CREEK
LAKE CHICOT
CALIFORNIA
WEIST LAKE
JACKSON CREEK
SUISUM BAY
SHASTA LAKE-INLET
MAIN 100 DRAIN
CACHUMA LAKE
SMITH CANAL
YOSEMITE LAKE
LOS ANGELES HARB
LOS ANGELES HAR9
CONNECTICUT
PINE BROOK
INDIAN RIVER
GOODWIN PARK POND
WETHFRSF1ELD COVE
KETTLE BROOK
DELAWARE
LITTLE CREEK
BROADKILL RIVER
FLORIDA
ALAFIA RIVER
WITHLACOOCHFE RIV
LAKE LUCERNF WEST
NEAREST TOWN
OR CITY

ATHENS
BESSEMER
BESSEMER
CENTREVILLE
GAYLESVILLE
JACKSON
MCINTOSH
MCINTOSH
MOBILE
MOBILE
MONTGOMERY
NOTASULGA
ROANOKE
TUSCALOOSA

BACK GATE
BENTON
JONESBORO
LAKE VILLAGE

CALIPATRIA
JACKSON
MARTINEZ
REDDING
RICHVALE
SANTA BARBARA
STOCKTON
STOCKTON
WILMINGTON
WILMINGTON

HADDAM
MILFORD
WETHERSFIFLD
WETHFRSFIFLD
WINDSOR LOCKS

LITTLE CREEK
MILTON

BRANDON
OADF CITY
ORLANDO
DATE OF KILL
f
i

6
6
9
5
3
2
5
8
4
5
S
7
8
It

9
9
8
4

2
6
7
2
6
4
9
9
8
8

4
7
4
9
8

6
4

2
2
8
0

16
9
3
28
14
11
IB
24
2^
28
12
26
16
26

10
16
10
25

17
18
21
18
18
29
15
15
2
1?

6
15
9
13
19

25
30

5
9
10
K
«
H
>•

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65

65
65

65
65
65
OPERATIONS
NDICATEP AS
RESPONSIBLE
FOR KILL
(SEC CODES
BELOW}

31
27
27
28
28
23
24
24
50
22
41
28
31
23

11
21
24
11

11
35
25
42
11
33
22
22
2*
25

26
27
30
31
27

28
11

21
22
42
TVPEOF FISH
KILLED

CAME

69%
-
21*
1*
-
-

5*
100%

-
17*
6*
3*

20*
25*
-
40*

10%
100*
95*
10%
50*
1*





100%
20%


100%


'

5 OS
50%
44%

roRAei

31*
-
79*
99*
-
-
100*
95%

100%
-
83*
9495
97*

80%
75%
-
60*

90%

5*
90*
50*
99«
100*
100*
loo*
100*


80%
100*
100%


100%
"

50%
50%
56%
- \
!•;
1


-

9%
-
-
25%
3356
-
1%
-
-
12%
97*

-
25*
3%
30%

-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-


-
-
—
-


100%


.
-

ESTIMATED
NUMBER
OF FISH
KILLED

1.238
100
469.500
5,745
-
-
87
64S
110
1.249
-
-
2,994
1.200

_
500
1 .000
~"

9,360
1 .000
91,000
10.000
1.500
600.600
—
1.000
2,000
2,500

65
-
300
3 ,000,000
13,071

10.000


30.000
15.000
115
SEVERITV
V
i ; s E
s : § 1
f i * j
(11 (11 (H (4)

4
4
2
2
4
2
4
2
-
4
-
1
2
3

2
3
1
3

3
-
2
1
-
3
—
-
4
4

2
3
2
2
2

1
1

1
2
4
ESTIMATED
MILES
OR
ACRES
AFFECTED

1M
2M
9A
7M
-
-
8M
-
1M
1M
-
26M
5M
1M

-
-
3M
3.000A

56A
-
2M
41A
-
l.OOOA
—
-
7A
7A

2M
-
1A
lOOA
1M

-
1M

12M
16M

> 1 DURATION OF 1
^— 1 CRITICAL 1
EFFECT 1

9 -
1 -
2 -
1 -
-
- -
1 -
- -
1 -
1 -
- -
3 -
2 -
1 -

3 -
9 -
3 -
10 -

10 -
-
2 -
4 -
-
3 -
—
-
-
"

- -
-
— —
2 -
- 9

- -


2 -
5 -

           14

-------



NIVBH6A LAKE
AFFECTED



GEORGIA
BARNETT CREEK.
TIRED CREFK
TONLAG1A RIVER
LITTLE OCONEE fUV
INDIAN CREEK
OCHLOCKNEE RIVER
CANOOCHEE RIVfR
CHATTOOGA RIVFR
HAWAI I
KALAUAC STREAM
IDAHO
BOWEN CREEK
ILLINOIS
FOX RIVER
SPORTSHEN5 LAKE
KICKAPCO CRFEK
DEFR CR DR-FL" R
JORDAN CRFFK
SALT CREEK
SANGAMON RIV-S FK
LAKE FORK
SUGAR CREFK
SANGAMON RIVER
PRINCE CREEK
KISHWAUKEF R-N RR
N1PPERMNK CRF-PX
INDIANA
BLACK CREFK
SAINT MARYS RIVER
RFFR CREEK
COAL CREEK
WHITE RIVER
WHITE RIVER
UNNAMED CREEK
WHITE RIVFR
EEL RIVER
MUSCATATUCK RIVEK
PAW PAW CREEK
SILVER CREEK
CHAIN OF LAKES
EAGLF CRErK
EAGLE CREFK
REDWOOD CREFK



MEAHC3T TOW
OR CITY




PRUNSWKK
CAIRO
GRIFFIN
JEFFERSON
MOULTRIE
MOULTRIE
SWAINSBORO
TRION-SUWRVLLF

AIEA

QRKSGS

CARPENTERSVILLE
DUNLAP-EOFLSTFN
FAIRFIELD
FAIRMOUNT
FARMER CITY
K1NCAID
LATHA"!
M1LFORD-WATSEK.A
MOUNT AUBURN
PRINCFV1LLE
WOODSTOCK
WOODSTOCK

CRAWFORDSVILLF.
FORT WAYNE
GALV/FSTON
HIILSBORO
MARTIN5VILLE
MUNCIE
HLINCIE
NORTH MANCHESTR
NORTH VERNON
PERU
SELLERSBURd
SOUTH RENH
fPEFONAV
SPEEDWAY
WEST LEBANON
DATE OF KILL




£
i


7
a
a
7
'b
5
5
6

6

ti,

7
9
a
7
1
11
8
6
7
8
e
6
6

6
7
9
5
7
9
9
e
6
6
5
7
6
7
9
7




V
a


22
20
6
26
11
19
21
27

8

27

7
11
27
20
9
6
10
12
•i
3
2ft
21
5

23
15
9
16
27
17
20
10
28
9
16
14
13
29
7
17




s
M


65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65

65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

OPEflATIONI
NDtCArED AS
RCSPONMBLE

(»E CODES
•ELOtft



24
22
26
28
28
22
28
28

11

22

31
32
13
25
24
35
4*
22
31
22
13
31

12
31
22
42
31
31
13
31
26
31
11
31
31
50
11
TVFEOF FILM
KILLED



flAMK




-
50*
50*
50*
-
-
-
50*

5*

100S

22%
loos
50*
1*
12*
72*
36*
3 Q*
52*
29*

1*
10*
1*
It
58
1*
25*
80*
5*
95*
1%
5*



FOK««<




-
50*
50*
50*
-
-
-
50*

95*



78*
50*
ion*
99*
26*
64*
70*
48*
92*
71*
ino*

99*
90*
99*
100*
99*
95*
100*
100*
99*
75*
20*
95*
5*
100*
95*
hi
-i 3
d <

* s~
E"E
f 5l
JJ g O


-
-
-
-
-
—
~


-

-

BE*
17*
91*
4*
51*
100*
25*
38*
10*
15*
100*

-



OF FISH
KILLED




-
-
-
5.000
-
~
~


1,000

1,250

231
15,356
336
659
107,14.5
16.039
146,902
6,304
41,633
5i627
1,296
554

2 .Don
600
700
750
18,000
5,000
1 ,000
750
15,000
1,000
25,000
2,500
4,000
500
1 ,000
2,200
SEVERITY

H
ft-
i 5 E £
o 2 8 I
>- ± • -i
'" -i» at. HI

.
.
2
2

•
2


l

2

4
1
2
2
2
4
2
3
2
2
2
2
2

2
3
4
3
3
3
3
1
3
2
2
2
2
4
3
2

ESTIMATED
MILE1
OH
ACRES
AFFECTED




5M
11M
6M
-
~
2M
low
20M

1M

1M

1M
10A
8M
3M
5M
23M
12M
15M
7M
3M

5M
2M
3M
1M
5M
5M
3M
3M
7M
3H
3M
3M
2A
1H
1M
3M
o


• *•£
i5S
— i —
DA I HH


- -
2 -
*" —
1
1
1 —
2 -
2

2 -

- 4

1 -
2 -
3 -
2 -
7 -
1 -
7 4
1 -
2 -
2
14 -

- 12
2 -
1 -
1 -
1 12
1 -
1 -
3 -
1 -
3 -
1 -
1 -
- 12
- 12
1 -
1 -
OPERATIONS CODES

10  Agricultural Operations
    11  Poisons (Herbicides, Pesticides, etc.)
    12  Fertilizers
    13  Manure, Silo, Feedlot Drainage, etc.

20  Industrial Operations
    21  Mining
    22  Food & Kindred Products
    23  Paper & Allied Products
    24  Chemicals
    25  Petroleum
    26  Metals
    27  Combinations
    28  Other

30  Muntcipal Operations
    31  Sewerage System
    32  Refuse Disposal
    33  Water System
    34  Swimming Pool
    35  Power

40  Transportation Operations   .
    41  Kail
    42  Truck
    43  Barge or Boat
    44  Pipe Line

50  Other Operations

»0  Unknown  (See next table, p. 26)
                           15

-------
         Report  of  Pollution-

             Caused  Fish Kills

                     (Continued)



           Cumulative Listing of
                Reports Received
           as  of Date of  Listing
OPERATIONS CODES

10  Agricultural Operations
    if Poisons (SerbMdet, Petticidet, etc.)
    12 Fertilizers
    13 Manure, Silo, Feedlot Drainage, etc.

20  Industrial Operations
    21 Mining
    22 Food £ Kindred Products
    23 Paper & Allied Products
    24 Chemicals
    25 Petroleum
    26 Metals
    27 Combinations
    28 Other

30  Municipal Operations
    31 Sewerage System
    32 Refuse Disposal
    33 Water System
    34 Swimming Pool
    35 Power

40  Transportation Operations
    41 Ball
    42 Truck
    43 Barge or Boat
    44 Pipe Line

00  Other Operations

90  Unknown (See next table, p. 29)


mvm on LAKB
APPICTID



IOWA
CORALVILLF. RESVR
TURKEY RIVFR
BLACKHAWK CREEK
NORTH RACCOON RIV
WALNUT CREEK
TU9KFY RIVFR
STORM LAKE STREAM
KANSAS
BRUSH CREEK
ARKANSAS RIVER
SPRING CREEK
TRIS NINNESCAH R
GOOSF8EPRY CREEK
LABETTE CREEK
KENTUCKY
HARRODS CREEK
LOUISIANA
BAYOU GR CAILLOU
BAYOU CHFVRFUL
BROWN LAKE
CASTOR CRFFK
HOUMA NAV CANAL
COMPANY CANAL
BLIND RIVFR
1AVO1I TERRFRONNF
RAVOU PREVOST
BAYOU BLACK
JEANFRETTE CANAL
BLACK BAYOU
BAYOU LACASSINE
GRAND BAYOU
LITTLE BAYOU DIP
LAKE NATCHFZ
°.AVOU TERREBONNE
1AYOU BOEUF
LAKE BOEUF
SAM FORETS CANAL
THFRIOT CANAL
FARM POND
TERREBONNE Dft CAN
RED RIVER
TWELVE MILE BAYOU
EIGHTY ARPENT CAN
BAYOU DU LARGE
flAYOU DU LARGE
BAYOU L ONION
GRAND BAYOU
LAFOURCHE RR CAN
BRAZFN CANAL
WATERPROOF CANAL
BAYOU TIGRF
JOE MIRE CANAL


MB AHBST TOWN
Ml CITY




CORALVILLE
CRESCO
DIKE
LAKESAC CITIES
RIDGEWAY
SCHLEY
STORM LAKE

COLUMBUS
DODGE CITY
FAIRVIEW
NATRONA
NEWTON
PARSONS

LA GRANGE

ASHLAND
CHAC BAY
COLUMBIA
COTTON PLANT
DtlLAC
GHEENS
GRAMFRCY*
HOUMA
HOUMA
HOUMA
JEANF.RFTTE
LAKE CHARLES
NIBLETT
PIERRE PASS
PIFRRE PASS
PIGFON
PRESOUE ISLE
RACELAND
RACELAND
RACELAND
RACELAND
RAYVILLE
SCHRIEVER
SHREVEPORT
SHREVEPORT
ST CHARLES PRSH
THERIOT
THERIOT
THI80DAUX
THIBODAUX
THIBOOAUX
VACHERIE
WATERPROOF
WHITE CASTLE
WHITE CASTLE
OAT


I



2
5
6
1
6
5
6

1
6
6
6
5
8

5

7
8
4
6
7
6
8
7
8
8
6
6
4
7
7
8
6
7
7
7
7
6
8
8
11
8
7
8
8
8
7
8
6
8
8
B OP KILL


s
O



15
11
14
9
17
16

1
7
6
7
17
15

10

12
20
15
30
22
17
23
12
11
23
30
18
26
13
13
23
27
21
21
21
21
1
19
IB
13
3
7
11
16
IB
21
19
26
23
?3


5



65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65
65

65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

OPmKATIONt
INDICATED At
MEIPONIIBLK
'Of KILL
CSBB COOBI
•BLOV)



23
21
24
31
22
22
12

22
13
13
13
13
13

31

11
11
11
11
22
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
42
31
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
TVPB OP PISH
KILLBD

PIRCBNT
• 4MB




10*
20*
30*
10*
20*
50*
5*

10*
10*
20*
10*
60*
10*

20*

10*
20*
20*
10*
5*
10*
20*
1C*
10*
20*
10*
5*
5*
20*
10*
20*
10*
10*
10*
5*
5*
40*
10*
20*
5*
10*
5*
-
10*
10*
10*
15*
20*
10*
10*

POHA«K




90*
80*
70*
90*
80*
50*
95*

90*
90*
SO*
90*
40*
90*

60*

90*
80%
80*
90*
95*
90*
80*
90*
90*
80*
90*
95*
95*
80*
90*
80*
90*
90*
90*
95*
95*
60*
90*
80*
95*
90*
95*
-
90*
90*
90*
85*
80*
90*
90*
- 3
r <
* .. >
!l
*~l



_
~
.
-
-
-
—

20*
65*
60*
20*
75*
15*

17*

_
—
-
_
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
40*
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-


• ITIHATBO
NIMMn
OP PliH
KILLBD




400.000
200
_
200.000
1.000
2on
150

1,500
500.000
45.000
20.000
1.000
3.000

-

9.000
2.750
4.500
1.250

3.000
1,250
2,250
250
1.250
2,600
7.500
3.500
10,000
2,500
550
2,500
2.500
1.250
300
500
300
1.250
32.500
500
2,250
2,500
750
750
750
500
1,250
3,500
1,250
850
tKVBMITV

i £




2

2
2
1
2




2
2
1
2

1

2
2
2


2




2
2

2
2


2





2
2
2





2
2
2
1

u-
|











3
3










3
3

3
3
3
3


3


3
3

3
3
3
3
3



3
3
3
3
3






i




4




4














































BBTIMATBD
HILU
Oil
ACKB1
APPBCTBD




_
_
3M
40M
_
_
-

2M
75M
3M
6M
2M
1M

3M

6M
2M
ISA
2M
1M
4M
2M
2M
1M
3M
2M
2M
1M
9M
3M
3A
3M
2M
5A
1M
2M
2A
2M
17M
5M
2M
2M
1M
2M
2M
2M
_
3M
2M
1M
&
" J
a OH
— 1 —
DA 1 Ml


10 -
_ .
- 2
45 -
- -
- -
- -

2 -
3 -
5 -
2 -
2 -
2 -

2 -

2 -
1 -
.
1 -
2 -
2 -
_
-
—
-
-
~
.
_
-
_
.
-
_
_
_
_
_
2 -
2 -
2 -
1 -

_
_
_
_
_
1 -
1 -
          16

-------

Mivmcn LAKB
Arrccrco


MAINE
AROOSTOOK RIVER
KENNEBCC RIVER
ANDROSCOGGIN RIV
PENORSCOT RIVER
MILLINOCKETT ST
MARYLAND
PATAPSCO RIVER
SEVERN RUN
CHOPTANK RIVER
CHAPTICO BAY
MASSACHUSETTS
BROAD ftROOK
MERRFMAOC PIVER
HAUER POND
CHICOPEE flROOK
OXBOW POND
NASHUA RIVER
TOWN BROOK.
MICHIGAN
CASS RIVEft
KEARSLEY CRFEK
NEW GRONNIGEN CR
SQUAW CREFK
KAk'KAWLIN RIV* NO
YUBA CREEK
BLACK RIVER
MINNESOTA
BLUE EARTH RIVER
SAINT LOUIS RIVEft
CENTER CREEK
LINOSTROM CREEK
MISSISSIPPI
PEARL RIVER
9IG CRK-LFAF RIV
MISSOURI
CEftAR CREEK
RUG PONO
SWEETWATER CREEK
CENTER CRFEK
BUFFALO CREEK
A P GREEN LAKE
SALT RIVER

NCMUT TOM
OH CITY



ASHLAND
AUGUSTA
JAY
LINCOLN
MILLINOCKETT

BALTIMORE CO
OOENTON
R1D6ELT
SAINT MARYS CO

FASTHAMPTON
LAWRENCE
MARLBOROUOH
MONSON
NORTHAMPTON
PEPPERELL
QU1NCY

CARO
DAVISON
HOLLAND TWP
MARSHALL
MIDLAND
TRAVERSE CITY
ZEELAND

BLUE EARTH
CLOOUET
FAIRMONT
FINLAND

CARTHAGE
f.Cf.0

ASHLAND
BOONESBORO
ELLINGTON
JOPLIN
LOUISIANA
MEXICO
MEXICO
DAT« O* KILL

i
i

8
6
6
8
T

8
4
S
T

6
9
T
9
6
6
4

11
7
a
10
a
6
5

9
B
9
7

B
T

T
6
7
12
5
7

s


17

29
12
10

31
6
•
16

8
15
9
2
3
30
30

15
13
IB
6
26
6
16

4
16
4
9

20
J"

13
12
11
17
4
25
28

5


65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
6!
65
65

65
65
65
65

6)
6!

65
65
65
65
65
65
65

4*1.1 ATIOM
HIMCATIPAI
HU0ONMBLI
FOHKH.L
•I LOW


11
23
2B
23
41

24
20
22
11

50
31
28
50
24

22
11
24
13
11
11
31

22
23
22
32

11
25

21
11
21
24
24
22
31
KILLED
BMBMT




25ft

2*
1*

-
-
-
"

100ft
75*
10*

3«
34*
20*
33*
100*
16*

10*
10*
100*

-
20*

25*
100*
20*
30*
75»
20*
*«KIMT



100*
75»
100*
9B*
99<

-
-
-



100*
iocs*
25*
90*
100*

97*
66*
100*
80*
67*
84*-

90*
ino*
90*

-
80*

75*
ao*
TO*
25*
BO*
•
N
til


-
-
—
-


-
-
-


-
„
-

-
.
-
-
-

-

-


-
-

KST4MATKD
frF PHH



1.000
-
16*000
1.000
"

2.000
31.200
-


50
500
2*000
300
1 .000
7,000
2.000

210
TOO
100
550
liA
250
4,479

1,000
1.000

-


5.500
2,000
9.500
3.000
z.noo
KVKMITV
H
MM
III III IIL J«

3
2
-
2
3

-
2
~


4
3
2
2
2
2
2

4
4
4
It
4
4

2
2
1
2

3
Z

2
2
2
1
2
2
2

UTXATU
MLU
Ml



1M
30M
-
10H
1M

6A
4M
"•


-
5M
1M
-

-
-
"
1H
3M

lOM
Itt
15M
2M

-
301

lOM
1A
4H
11H
30A
2M
j
iil
0* I Ml


1 -
25
"• -
4 -
4 -

- -
~ ~
~ •"


1 -
1 -
1 -
1 -
3 ~
4 -
7 -

6 -
2 -
1 -
•• ~
2 -
2 -

6 -
1 -
7 -
2 -

1 -
3 -

5 -
5 -
14 -
5 ~
10 -
OPERATIONS CODES

10  Agricultural Operations
    11  Poison* (ffer&
-------
          Report  of Pollution-

             Caused Fish  Kills

                     (Continued)



           Cumulative Listing  of

                 Reports  Received
           as  of Date of Listing
OPERATIONS CODES

10  Agricultural Operations
    11  Poisons (Herbicides, Pesticides, etc.)
    12  Fertilizers
    13  Manure, Silo, Feedlot Drainage, etc.

20  Industrial Operations
    21  Mining
    22  Food & Kindred Products
    23  Paper & Allied Products
    24  Chemicals
    25  Petroleum
    26  Metals
    27  Combinations
    28  Other

30  Municipal Operations
    31  Sewerage System
    32  Refuse Disposal
    33  Water System
    34  Swimming Pool
    35  Power

40  Transportation Operations
    41  Rail
    42  Truck
    43  Barge or  Boat
    44  Pipe Line

50  Other Operations

00  Unknown (See next table, p. 26)


RIVER OR LAKE
AFFECTED



MISSOURI -CONT-
SHOAL CREEK
L DRYWOOD TR1R
SWAN CREEK
WHITTEN8URO CREFK
SPRING CREEK
TWO MILE CREEK
MONTANA
SPRING CREEK
OKFrpF CRFFK
LITTLE ROCKY CR
NEBRASKA
GEORGE AHLFRS PND
RARTLETT EARM PND
TURKEY CRFEK
STE1NHARDT PK LK
BIG BLUE RIVER
TWO RIVER CARP LK
LOGAN CREEK
NEW HAMPSHIRE
MERRIMACK RIVF.P
MERRIMACK RIVER
MERRIMACK RIVER
RLAISDELL LAKE
EOUHEGAN RIVER
NEW JERSEY
INTERCOASTAL WWAY
METEDECONK RIVER
CHFpSEOUAKF PK LK
LAWRFNCE SPOOK
DELAWARE RIVFR
TRIB S BR RARITA.N
SECOND NESHAN1C R
RRAIDBURN POND
ST FISH HATCHERY
IMLAYSTOWN LAKE
LITTLE SILVER CR
RARITAM RIVFR
DIXONS POND
TOMS RIVER
DELAWARERIVFR
DELAWARE RIvFR
GRFFNRROOK
SMf.TH CRFFK
CORYS BROOK
SWANS LAKF
WARFUNGTN "ILL LK
TOMS RIVER
BR BIG LEBANON CR


NEAREST TOWN
OR CITV




NEOSHO
NEVADA
RICH FOUNTA'IN
STEELVILLE
SULLIVAN
THAYER

CHOTEAU
FRFNCHTOWN
NYF

BELGRADE
ELLIS
GENEVA
NEBRASKA CITY
SEWARD
VALLEY
WAKEFIELD

CONCORD
MANCHESTER
NASHUA
SUTTON
WILTON-MILFORO

ATLANTIC CITY
BRICK TWP
CHFFSFOUAKF
DFANS
FIFLDSBORO
FLANDERS
FLFMINGTON
FLORHAM PARK
HACKETTSTOWN
IMLAYSTOWN
LITTLE SILVER
I*ANVILLE
FOUNTAIN LAKES
OCEAN GATE
PAULSPORO
PAULSBORO
PLAIMFIFLO
SFWAREN
STIRLING
SWFDF.SRORO
SWEDFS6ORO
TOMS RIVER
TURNERSVILLE
DATE Or KILL


C
H
I

2
11
10
5
4
3

2
7
3

8
4
12
4
5
5
6

9
8
8
7
8

8
8
1
3
5
11
8
5
2
8
8
6
7
8
5
5
6
2
10
7
7
a
7




<
o

22
IP
16
26
18
10

19
14
2

2fl

11

4
3
17

15
18
18
6
16

23
1
6
27
I?
24
11
28
15
21
9
30
12
1
14
20
2
16
2
14
9
20
26



E
kl
>

65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

OPERATION!
INDICATED AS
RESPONSIBLE
FOR KILL
1st! cooes
BELOW)


31
31
13
28
41
28

11
"5(1
11

41
13
31
30
24
12
31

31
31
31
30
28

31
20
3(1
42
24
31
22
34
26
11
11
31
42
31
28
27
27
44
50
11
11
27
22
TYPE OF FISH
KILLED

"CRCENT
CAME



5«
20*
10S
60*
10*
25*

90*
20*
100*

85%

50*

75*

5S

30*


80%
"

75*


10%

100%


98
••0-1
°«*
>-2u
X B* flC
W _ U
uui
K = I
££S

.
-
-
-
-
~

_
-
-

_
-
-
-
-
-
~

_
-
-
-
"

75*
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
. -
-
-
•*


ESTIMATED
NUMBER
OF FISH
KILLED



2.000
250
1 .200
5,000
1 ,000
11,000

400
500
500

400
. 1.000
23,232
-
8.000
200
5.000

800
10,000
2,000
150
-

100
1.000
3,001
300
100
100
20
500
18.000
810
2.000
ion
500
3 .OOO
2.000
1 .000
50
15
10
2.000
30
5,000
420
'SEVERITY

u
5
« > s s
i- * a *
o u o S
K I X J

3
3
2
2
2
2

3
1
2

4
2
-
3
2
3
2

3
2
3
4
4

4
2
2
3
4
1
4
2
2
2
2
3
2
2
3
3
4
4
4
1
3
3
3

ESTIMATED
MILES
OH
ACRES
AFFECTED



2M
1M
3M
2M
5M
1M

3M
2M
3M

3A
-
4M
_
5M
-
15M

3M
5M
2M
_
1M

1M
1M
4A
-
1M
1M
1M
5A
-
IDA
30*

1A
2M
-
low
1M
2A
_
IDA
20A
1M
1M
H
o-


iP
O(

DA

1
3
3
_
14
1

11
1
10

14
-
14
10
-
3
2

2
1
1
3
-

3
2
2
-
-
1
-
4
1
_
6
-
3
2
_
-
1
4
-
1
1

2
U

IMH

_
-
-
_
.
-

*
_
-

_
u
-
.
12
-
-

_
-
-
-
12

_
-
_
-
-
-
12
-
-
_
.
-
_
-
_
™
_
_
-
_
_
.
-
          18

-------



RIVER OR LAKE
AFFECTED



NEW JEPSEY -CONT-
PEOUFST RIVFR
STONEY BROOK
GREAT SWAMP BRNCH
WOODPURY CREEK
NEW YORK
GOLDEN HILL CREEK
LITTLE HOOSK RIV
EROCKPORT CREEK
SPRING CREEK
MILL-CANASERGA CR
SANDBURG CRFEK
ROCK SPRINGS OR
KEUKA INLFT
CADOSIA CREEK
OSWEGATCHIE RIVFR
JOHNSON CREFK
GENESEE RIVER
8RONX RIVER
BULL CREEK
OAK ORCHARD CREEK
OLFAN CRFFK
RED CREEK
SUSOUEHANNA RIVFR
UNADILLA RIVER
EAST KILL CREEK
W BR DELAWARE RIV
OATKA CREEK
SENECA RIVER
SENECA RIVER
CAYUTA CREEK
NORTH CAROLINA
LIVINGSTON CREEK
ST ANDREWS COL LK
YADKIN RIVER
WIGGINS LAKE
TOWN CREEK
PALEN CREEK
OHIO
BLACK FK-MOHICM R
MANSER PONDS
MIAMI RIVER
MIAMI RIVER
RIG SANDY CREEK
BIG SANDY CREEK
SANDY CREFK
TWELVE-MILE CREEK
OLEMTANOY PIVFR
ROCKY RIVER
ROCKY RIVFR
PRAIRIE RUN



HEAACIT TOWN
OR CITY




VIENNA
WATCHtJNG
WINSLOW TWP
WOODBURY

BARKER
BERLIN
BROCKPORT
CALEDONIA
DANSVILLE
FLLENVILLE
FRANKLINVILLE
HAMMONDSPORT
HANCOCK
HEUVELTON
MIDDLEPORT
MOUNT MORRIS
N WHITE PLAINS
NORTH TONAWANDA
OAKFIELD
OLEAN
RED CREEK
SIDNEY
SOUTH FDMESTON
TANNFRSVILLE
WALTON
WARSAW
WATERLOO
WATERLOO
WAVERLY

FREEMAN
LAURINBURG
PATTERSON
ROCKY MOUNT
SALISBURY
WEEKSVILLE

ASHLAND CO
ASHTABULA CO
BUTLER CO
BUTLER CO
CARROLL CO
CARROLL CO
CARROLL CO
COSHOCTON CO
CRAWFORD CO
CUYAHOGA CO
CUYAHOGA CO
DELAWARE CO



DATE OF KILL



I



11
4
7
5

7
6
6
1
9
7
6
9
6
7
6
7
6
5
7
7
7
8
8
6
8
6
8
9
7

9
7
8
7
12
6

6
11
7
9
8
9
6
8
7
5
8
5



s
a


24
20
9
13

4
11
5
23
20
3d
18
24
30
22
24
8
29
5
13
20
25
19
31
12
18
23
14
27
2

3
12
20
24
2
13

30
11
3
2
19
20
4
8
30
25
17
6



W



65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65


INDICATED AS
RESPONSIBLE
FOR KILL

BELOV)



24
50
11
31

22
28
28
25
28
50
1 1
22
50
22
24
22
21
26
22
20
22
31
22
50
22
28
31
31
31

12
11
23
11
27
26

26
22
23
23
31
31
31
25
31
31
31
22
TYPE OF FISH
KILLED


PKMCCNT




1*

10*



50*
2*
100*

10*


10*
10*

10*
5*
5*

7*
-
5*
10*
10*
10*

1C
2*
10*

90*
100*
5*
100*
57*
30*

_
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~*


PiiteiNT




99*
ion*
90*
100*

100%
50*
98%

100*
90*
inn*
loo*
90*
90*
ion*
90*
95*
95*
100*
93*
-
95*
90*
90*
90*
100*
99*
98*
90*

in*

95*

43*
70*

_
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
""

u
; 5
o°i
SB B
x w



_
-
-
—

_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
•-
—
~

_
-
-
-
-
"

-
-
-
-
-
_
-
—
-
-
-
"



ESTIMATED
NUMBER
OF FISH




7, son
200
6.000
inn

1 .000
38
9.000
200.000
10. con
l.onn
24
35
1.000
7,500
15,000
1,500
750
9,000
3,000
10,000
«
12.500
12.500
1.000
5,000
10.000
15.000
7,500
300

347
20.000
180
250
1,260
750

226
10.775
22,472
53,804
2,205
18
21
215
532
1,546
353
5

SEVERITY

•I
-* >• " b
< > m *
o : o 1
t- X • J

III 111 ill 141

1
3
2
3

2
4
1
3
2
1
3
1
2
2
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
—

3
2
4
4
3
4

_
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
~


ESTIMATED
MILES
ACRES
AFFECTED



8M
2M
-
-

.
IM
-
-
2M
3M
IM
-
2M
2M
12M
IM
2M
2M
-
2M
3M
2M
2M
-
-
IM
2M
IM
IM

'IM
75A
7M
60A
-
IM

_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—

i
Z
2"



H
rCC
3B u.
au w

DA


1
-
1
1

1
-
1
3
-
.
—
—
-
-
_
_
-
7
2
2
-
1
-
-
2
-
_
.
•*

_
4
—
1
-
1

_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
•

HK


_
-
12
-

„
2
-
-
_
-
2
-
-
-
—
.
_
-,
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
-
12
_
-

_
-
12
-
-
^

_
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
~
-
-
—
OPERATIONS CODES

10  Agricultural Operations
    11   Poisons (Herbicides, Peaticidesj etc.)
    12   Fertilizers
    13   Manure, Silo, Peedlot Drainage, etc.

20  Industrial Operations
    21   Mining
    22   Food & Kindred Products
    23   Paper & Allied Products
    24   Chemicals
    25   Petroleum
    26   Metals
    27   Combinations
    28   Other
30
40
    Municipal Operations
    31  Sewerage System
    32  Refuse Disposal
    33  Water System
    34  Swimming Pool
    35  Power
    Transportation Operations
    41  Hall
    42  Truck
    43  Barge or Boat
    44  Pipe  Line

50  Other Operations

00  Unknown  (See next table, p. 26 )
                           19

-------
         Report  of  Pollution-

             Caused  Fish Kills

                     (Continued)



          Cumulative Listing of
                Reports  Received
           as  of Date of  Listing
OPERATIONS CODES

10  Agricultural Operations
    11  Poisons (Herbicide*, Pettioidet, etc.)
    12  Fertilizers
    13  Manure, Silo, Feedlot Drainage, etc.

20  Industrial Operations
    21  Mining
    22  Food £ Kindred Products
    23  Paper & Allied Products
    24  Chemicals
    25  Petroleum
    26  Metals
    27  Combinations
    28  Other

30  Municipal Operations
    31  Sewerage System
    32  Refuse Disposal
    33  Water System
    34  Swimming Pool
    35  Power

40  Transportation Operations
    41  Hall
    42  Truck
    43  Barge or Boat
    44  Pipe Line

SO  Other Operations

90  Unknown (See next table, p. 26)



NIVIH ON LAKI
AFFCCTBO


OHIO -CONT-
SCIOTO RIVER
PIPE CREEK
PLEASANT RUN
SYCAMORE CREEK
SCIOTO RIVER
SCIOTO RIVER
WEST 9R DEER CRK
BLACKFORK CREEK
LITTLE MIAMI RIV
LITTLE MIAMI RIV
FLAT RUN
LEATHERWOOD CREEK
BLANCHARD RIVER
BLANCHARD RIVER
HOG CREEK
SCIOTO RIVER
LIT STILLWATER CR
DODSON FORK
PAINT CREEK
PAINT CREEK
PAINT CREEK
TURTLE CREEK
TURTLE CREEK
WHITE OAK CREEK
HOCKING RIVER
HOCKING RIVFR
OLD TOWN CREEK
DOUGHTY CREFK
SUGAR CREEK
SUGAR CREFK
BLACKFORK CREEK
LITTLE SALT CREEK
SYMMES CREEK
FLAT RUN DITCH
KOKOilNG RIVER
LAKF ERIE
MAUMEE RIVER
SPRING FORK CREEK
SPRING FORK CRFFK
SPRING FORK CREEK
BRANCH BEAVER CRK
ISLELAND CREEK
TRIE MEANDER CRK
TRIB INDIAN RUN C
RIFFLE CREEK
ROCKY RIVER
MIAMI RIVER
MIAMI RIVER
MIAMI RIVER
MIAMI RIVFR
MIAMI RIVFR
KOKOMNG RIVER
BIG RUN CREEK
DILLON LAKE
MUSKINGUM RIVER
CRANE CREEK
JONATHAN CREEK
MILLERS FORK
SEVEN MILE CREEK
SEVEN-MILE CREEK



NIAHUT TOW
ON CITV



DELAWARE CO
ERIE CO
FAIRFIELD CO
FAIRFIELO CO
FRANKLIN CO
FRANKLIN CO
FULTON CO
GALLIA CO
GREENE CO
GREENE CO
GUERNSEY CO
GUERNSEY CO
HANCOCK CO
HANCOCK CO
HARDIN CO
HARDIN CO
HARRISON CO
HIGHLAND CO
HIGHLAND CO
HIGHLAND CO
HIGHLAND CO
HIGHLAND CO
HIGHLAND CO
HIGHLAND CO
HOCKING CO
HOCKING CO
HOCKING CO
HOLMES CO
HOLMES CO
HOLMES CO
JACKSON CO
JACKSON CO
JACKSON CO
KNOX CO
KNOX CO
LAKF CO
LUCAS CO
MADISON co
MADISON CO
MADISON CO
MAHONING CO
MAHONING CO
MAHONING CO
MAHONING CO
MARION CO
MEDINA CO
MIAMI CO
MIAMI CO
MIAMI CO
MONTGOMERY CO
MONTGOMERY CO
MORROW CO
MUSKINGUM CO
MUSKINGUM CO
MUSKINGUM CO
OTTAWA CO
PERRY CO
PREBLE CO
PREBLE CO
PRERLE CO



DATKOP KILL


₯
I

8
9
12
9
5
8
10
7
5
6
9
8
8
10
7
9
7
5
5
6
7
6
8
6
7
7
5
5
7
9
7
8
6
7
9
7
10
5
7
8
9
6
1
5
5
7
1
6
8
7
8
12
7
2
9
9
8
8
5
12



2

31
15
17
5
23
18
7
10
27
11
3
29
2
17
25
25
25
29
6
6
1
10
27
24
11
24
3
17
21
22
5
22
15
7



?

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
8 65
22 65 •
8
26
in
9
9
in
11
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
2 65
IS 65
1 65
22 65
30 65
29 65
26 65
20 65
21 65
13 65
18 65
13 65
10 65
12 65
19 65
29 65
2 65


OPERATIONS
INDICATED AS
RIIPONI4ULI
FOR KILL
ISEE COOKS
RKLOVI

31
22
22
22
31
31
13
21
31
31
24
21
31
31
11
31
21
13
31
31
31
28
31
24
21
21
25
22
22
22
31
21
21
25
24
3*
31
13
13
13
21
13
21
21
24
31
26
31
31
31
35
13
5P
25
21
22
21
11
31
31
TYPE Of PUH
KILLtO


•*M«


„
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-


F»HA«B


_
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
•
-
-
-
-
*
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
*
f
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
—
-
—
-
—
-
-
*

, jj
u

«•«
m

..
-
-
-
_
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-•
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
».
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
—



ESTIMATED
NUMEER
KILLED


707
394
160
36*940
13.314
1.049
2.004
73
15,649
63
20
154
720
1.245.374
274
618
164
3.549
1.123
1.123
2.263
4
105
6*3
1.189
44.00(1
52
179
330
972
131
22
14
62
12.422
4.922
361.418
22.255
1.956
3*821
1.312
20
1*644
1*206
739
353
5.407
15
12.007
1.420
11.250
1.266
371
1*645
1*341
278*968
7,500
769
1*962
8,474

•EVKRrrr

M
£
< 5 1 £
S I S !
Ill fB (M 141

_
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
,-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
-
-
-
—
—
-
—
-
—
. -.
—
—
-
-
—
*.
_.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
_
-
-


••TNI AT ID
MIL I*
OH
ACM It
ArMCTto


_
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
—
_
-
-
—
—
-
—
-
—
- •
—
—
-
—
—•
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
- •
_
-
-

k
I J
in
2SS
DA I Ml

_ _
- -
- -
* _
_ —
-
-
- _
- -
- -
— -
-
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
•* .
- -
- -
- -
-
- -
- -
- . -
- -
_ -
. -
"• -
- -
• -
- -
- -
- _
- -
• -
- -
" -
~ —
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
- -
«• —
.
- -
— -
* -
— -
• -
- -
-
- -
— -
*
- -
          20

-------
RIVEH ON LAKE
(FFICTIO
OHIO -CONT-
TRIB BLANCHARD R
SCIOTO RIVER
SANDUSKY RIVER
HALES CR-BRADY RN
MILLERS RUN
PINE CRFEK
EANDI/SKY Rli/ER
SANDUSKY RIVER
NIMHHILLEN CREEK
SIPPO CflFFK
LITTLE CUYAHQGA R
SUMMIT LAKE
MILL CREEK
LITTLE AUGLAIZE R
LAKE HOPE
TURTLE CREEK
DUCK CREEK
DUCK CREEK
DUCK CREEK
OHIO RIVFR
SANOUSKY CRFEK
SANDUSKY RIVER
OKLAHOMA
ROCK CREEK.
FT CIS SON RESVR
WALNUT CREEK
BIG TURKEY CREEK
BANOY CREEK
OREGON
WILLAMETTE RIVER
DF.VILS LAKF
TUALATIN RIVER
SPOUT CREEK
SOUTH SANTIAM RIV
LOUSE CREEK
LAKE OSWEGO
BLUE LAKE
COLUMBIA SLOUGH
JOHNSON CREEK
JOHNSON CREEK
TR1B WILLAMETTE R
CEDAR CREEK
BENEDICT PONrt
PENNSYLVANIA
THIS BEAVER CREEK
JORDAN CREEK
JORDAN CREEK
JORDAN CREEK
LEHIGH RIVER
LIITLE LEHIGH CR
LITTLE LEHIEH CR
HIAMUT TOWN
OH CITV

PUTNAM CO
ROSS CO
SANDUSKY CO
SCIOTO CO
SCIOTO CO
SCIOTO CO
SENECA CO
SEWECA CO
STARK CO
STAR* -CO
SUMMIT CO
SUMMIT CO
UNION CO
VAN WERT CO
VlNTON CO
WARREN CO
WASHINGTON CO
WASHINGTON CO
WASHINGTON CO
WASHINGTON CO
WYANDOT CO
WYANDOT CO

Ei-MORE CITY
PRYOR
PURCELL
WAUKOMIS
WILBURTON

ALBANY
OEVILS LAKF.
FOREST GROVF
HARLAN
LEPANON
MERLIN
OS WE GO
PORTLAND
PORTLAND
PORTLAND
PORTLAND
PORTLAND
REX HILL
SALEM
ABBOTTSTOXN
ALLENTOHN
ALLENTOWN
ALLENTOWN
ALLENTOWN
ALLENTOWM
ALLEMTOMN 	
PATI OF MIL
I

9
5
9
6
5
6
7
a
8
9
T
11
T
11
3
7
5
9
9
5
7
a

10
12
7
1
12

6
8
8
8
9
4
8
a
9
6
a
4
4
6
2
5
9
9
i
5
T
s

19
30
10
9
14
7
24
16
24
17
T
9
12
IS
2
11
21
2
10
13
28
25

2
24
28
25
1

25
3
19
23
27
29
5
9
7
30
2
27
26
23
13
28
10
27
2
15
24
!

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65

65 •
65
65
£5
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
63'
65
65
65
65
MDICATBO M
HHMNHBUC
FOM KILL
ftK COOM
••LOW

13
23
31
21
11
21
31
31
22
22
2«
28
31
44
21
31
22
22
21
24
31
31

51
31
31
25
31

27
32
31
28
22
28
32
50
33
26
23
24
50
28
28
30
30
38
28
22
28
TVP1 Of VBH
KILLED
• IK INT
• AMI

-
"*
-
-
~
*
~
-
—
—
"•
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~


1%
5*


-
~
10*
ion
70*
~
-

—

4 OH
401
28*
50«
SOU
901
•••CENT

-
—
—
-
-
•
~
-
-
—
~
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-


99*
95%
99*


-
•
9(1*
90*
30*
~
~
100*
—

100*
60*
60*
72*
50*
50*
10*
I

-
™
~
"
™
""
~
—
—
•" ,
™
~
~
*
™
—
™
~
~
~
~


-
99*


-
"*
-
-
-
""
~
-
"

-
UTHUTID
MUIHIM
OF FHH
KILL>D

1.627
1.704
105.522
46
1.234
15
4 .833
906
403
2*
25*
L .82?
4.699
14.533
133
2.137
1.611
21
234
22.799
3.529
65

2.000
500
1.200.00"


-

499
50
10.000


90
~

300
2.526
200
3.000
50
5.000
35
MtviHirv
r
in IB in M

-
~
™
"
**
~
~
"
™
—
""
~
*
~
~
—
~
*'
"'
~
™


Z
1
2


-

4
J
3


1


3
2
4
1
4
2
4
HTOMTIO
KB.U
on
tout

-
""
~
~
"^
~
~
™
~
~
~
™
""
~
~~
~
~
*
~
""
™*


1M
1M
39M


-

1M
1M
20A


1M


1M
1M
1M
1M
2M
1M
1 * 1 DUIUTIQIf OF 1
L__J C«TIC*L 1
|T| """ 1

- -

™ **
^ ~
" ~


*
* ™
"
™ ~
™
** —
" ™
* ~
~

" *
* *
~
~


3 -
1 -


- -
~ ~

1 -
- 6
- 12


- -


1 -
- 1
- 4
3 -
- 4
1 -
- 6
24
25
26
27
28
OPERATIONS CODES

10  Agricultural Operations
    11  Poisons (HerMciiet, Pettidiet, etc.)
    12  Fertilisers
    13  Manure, Silo, Feedlot Drainage, etc.

20  Industrial Operations
    21  Mining
    22  Food i Kindred Products
    23  Paper  & Allied Products
        Chemicals
        Petroleum
        Metals
        Combinations
        Other

30  Municipal Operations
    31  Sewerage System
    32  Kef use Disposal
    33  Water  System
    34  Swimming Pool
    35  Power

40  Transportation Operations
    41  RaU
    42  Track
    43  Barge or Boat
    44  Pipe Line

30  Other Operations

90  Unknown (See nest table, p. 26 )
                          21

-------
          Report  of  Pollution-

              Caused  Fish  Kills

                      (Continued)


           Cumulative Listing of
                 Reports Received
            as  of Date of  Listing
OPERATIONS CODES

10  Agricultural Operations
    11   Poisons (Herbicides, Pestieidee, etc.)
    12   Fertilizers
    13   Manure, SUo, Feedlot Drainage, etc.

20  Industrial Operations
    21   Mining
    22   Food & Kindred Products
    23   Paper & Allied Products
    24   Chemicals
    25   Petroleum
    26   Metals
    27   Combinations
    28   Other

30  Municipal Operations
    31   Sewerage System
    32   Refuse Disposal
    33   Water System
    34   Swimming Pool
    35   Power

40  Transportation Operations
    41   Rail
    42   Truck
    43   Barge or  Boat
    44   Pipe Line

50  Other Operations

90  Unknown (See next table, p. 26)




HIVEROB LAKE
AFFECTED


PENNSYLVANIA -CON T
TROUT CREEK
WILLIAMS FARM PND
POQUFSSENG CREEK
tUSACOQ'JiLLAS CR
SWA^P CRECK
WEST SWAMP CREEK
MONONGAHELA RIVER
SCHUYLK1LL RIVER
NANCY RUN CREEK
CONOCOCHEAGUE CR
CONODOGLPINET CR
CONOCCCHEAGIJE CR
TR!P CROOKEP CR
TR IB BUSH

°35
£ii


_
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
"



ESTIMATED
NUMBER
OF FISH



1 .500
50
3 0 i 0 0 0
1 .000
50
20
5.100
400
120
162
150
15
-
1,000
2 .500
ion
3,000
400
200
10
500
10.000
20"
500
125
5 ,000
3 ,000
500
592
125,000
55
6,000
4,332
16
15
-
100
—
250
2,200
2,000
1,749
-
2,000
2,000
3.652
1»000
500
5 ,000
6oo»n3a
450
32,970
200
17,075
350
1,100
885
200
~"

SEVERITY


u
, > I .
\ 1 I 3
41) U) 111 J4L

3
4
.
3
4
4
3
4
4
4
4
4
1
3
2
4
3
4
4
4
3
2
4
3
4
2
3
4
2
1
4
2
1
4
4
1
4
3
4
1
4
3
2
2
3
3
3
4
2
1
4
2
4
2
4
3
3
4
3.


CIT MATED
MILES
OH
ACMES



1H
1A
1M
1M
1M
1M
2M
-
1M
1M
1M
1M
5. VI
IN
1M
1M
1M
1M
1M
2M
1M
3M
1M
TM
7M
11M
1M
1M
2M
30M
1M
1M
2M
-
-
2M
1M
5M
4M
4M
1M
2M
16M
2M
4M
2M
1M
1M
6M
3M
1M
2M
1M
3M
1M
2M
1M
2M
1M

u
o






Is'
ou
D*


2
-
2
1
-
-
1
-
-
-
1
-
3
1
-
3
2
-
5
-
-
1
1
4
3
7


MM


_
J
-
-
2
12
12
-
3
12
-
12
-
-
12
-
-
12
-
5
12
12
-
-
-
-
12
-
3 -
15 -

6
14 -

-

12
-
3
3 -
2
-
'
-
~

3

a
4 -
1

-
12
3 -
1
1

-
12
12
5 -
1
1


12 -

1
• 12

1 -
2 -
1

2 -
•

           22

-------




RIVE* ON LAKE
AFFECTED



PENNSYLVANIA -CONT
CHEST CREEK
BROCK CRE'iK
BUCK CREEK
SUSOUEHANNA RIVFR
WILLI 5 CRFFK
RHODE tSLAMn
BLACK STONF R'.VER
MESHANTICUT LAKE
SOUTH CAflOLtWA
TRIB BLACK RIVER
SOUTH DAKOTA
SHERPROTH Pp 1&2
TENNFSSEE
HATCK1E RfVcR
09F.Y RIVER-F FORK
CHICKAMAUGA RESVR
FAIAR BR-EAST FK
RED RIVER
CHEATHAM CREEK
ROARING FORK CR
PEAVFR CREFK
LOOSAHATCHIF R l\t
MILL CRfFK
RICHLANO CRFEK
SHFLIY PARK LAKE
NEW RIVFR
RAILF.Y FORK CRF.FK
TEXAS
BENNETT CRFF<
DRAINAGE C«M>L
PLEASANT BAYOU
CANADIAN RIVER
RSOFISH RAY
COLORADO RIVFR
COLORADO RIVFR
GOOSF CREFK
S4N JAC1NTO BAY
NECHFS RIVER
WHITE ROC< CREEK
UNNAHED CANAL
OLD RIVER
UNNAMED STREAM
CRYSTAL CRE^K
ESPANTOS* CREEK




MCAIIESl TOWN
OH CITT




WF.STOVER
YAPDLEY
YAROLEY
YORK HAVEN
YORK

ALBION
CRANSTON

KINGSTRFE

ORAL

BOLIVAR
BYRDTOWN
CHATTANOOGA
CHATTANOOGA
CLARKSV1LLE
EAGLEVILLE
6ATLINBURG
KNOXVILLE
NASHVILLE
NASHVILLF
NASHVILLE
ON F I PA
PARIS

ADAWSVILLE
AL'A LOMA
AL VI M
ALVIW
AMARELLO
ARAHSA<; PAS?
AUSTIN
AUSTIN
BAYTOWN
FIAYTOWN
BEAUMONT
BRANBON
BRAZORIA
CHANMELVIEW
CHFCO
CONROE
CRYSTAL CITY



DATE OF KILL




X
t
i

7
8
3
3
9

It
B

*

1

7
7
a
14
9
10
1
7
12
e
8

6
2
4
3
4
3
10
<3
9
7
9
6
9
3
2





K
£

16
24
24
15
a

6
15

18

9

12
29
11
21
15
21
3
21
10
28
22
1 1
1
?B

26
13
22
25
10
26
12
23
29
24
23
24
26
22
22





5
H
>

65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65

65

65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65


OPERATION!
NOICATEP **
HESPONIIBLE
FOR KILL

tftEE COOE1
• ELOW1


21
28
28
35
28
26

27
11

22

41

22
22
24
50
21
13
33
22
24
50
31
30
21
31

24
25
31
25
31
43
31
31
31
31
27
13
50
31
27
24
22

KILLED



• RCKMT
OAME



50*
20%
40%
50»
75*

5,

704

75*

10*
24*
95*
24*
50*
24*
10*
10%
10*

50*
253
5*
20*
15*
aot
50*
2*



PEHCINT
POHAiE



50*
80*
6016
50*
25*

100*
95K

30*

25*

65*
90*
76*
5*
7i*
50*
76*
90*
90*
90S
100%
100*
100*

50*
100*
100*
75$
60*
loo*
70*
100*
100*
95*
80*
100*
20*
50*
98*

J \

Ih O J


w« w
ill
Si8

-
-

1

~

-

27*
17*
e*
40*

-
-
IDS
556



ESTIMATED

or FM*I
KILLED



50^540
1 .000
1.024
201
5.000

1 .000
5,000

~

-

143
6>000
150
12.000 .
1 .500
3,700
100
3,000
500
30
10,000
40

75
6
200
200
2,000
s.ooo
5,000
500
2.000
5.000
200
1.000

levEmTv

y
*•

< > g |

111 
-------
         Report of  Pollution-

             Caused  Fish Kills

                     (Continued)


          Cumulative Listing of
                Reports Received
           as of Date of  Listing
OPERATIONS CODES

10  Agricultural Operation*
    if Poisons (Herliicidetj PetHcidet, etc.)
    12 Fertilizers
    18 Manure, Silo, Peedlot Drainage, etc.

20  Industrial Operations
    21 Mining
    22 Food 4 Kindred Products
    23 Paper ft Allied Products
    24 Chemicals
    26 Petroleum
    20 Metal*
    27 Combinations
    28 Other

30  Municipal Operations
    31 Sewerage System
    32 Refuse Disposal
    33 Water System
    34 Swimming Pool
    35 Power

40  Transportation Operations
    41 Rail
    42 Truck
    43 Barge or Boat
    44 Pipe Line

SO  Other Operations

00  Unknown (See next table, p. 26)



NIVER OH LAMB
APPICTID



TEXAS -CONT-
UNNAMED STREAM
NECHES RIVER
BERNARD RIVER
ARROYO COLORADO
UNNAMED STREAM
GALVESTON BAY
ROY WARREN POND
CLEAR FK BRAZOS R
TRINITY RIVFR
BAYOII VISTA
TRIB TO HIGHLANDS
SAN JACINTO BAY
FORK OF BRAZOS R
ANGELINA RIVER
UNNAMED STREAM
FOX CREEK
HOUSTON SHIP CHAN
WANDA CREEK
MOORES LAKE
SABINE RIVER
RED OAK CREFK
PRIVATE LAKE
PINF CREFK
NUECFS BAY
MEDINA RIVER
MEDINA RIVER
MEDINA RIVER
MEDINA RIVER
MEDINA RIVER
SAN ANTONIO RIVER
WILLOW SPRINGS
IND BARGE CANAL
BANDIES CREEK
COLORADO RIVER
WHITE OAK CREEK
HOUSTON SHIP CHAN
SWANS LAKE
COLORADO RIVER
UNNAMED STREAM
BUSHY CREEK
UTAH
BEAR RIVER
LITTLE LOGAN RIV
PARLEYS CRFEK
VERMONT
WINOOSKI RIVER
MAO RIVER
VIRGINIA
PRATER CREEK
CRANBERRY CREEK
GOOSE CREEK
FALLING CREEK



•EARMT Tom
OIICITT




DENTON
DIBOLL
EAST BERNARD
EDINBURG
FORT WORTH
GALVESTON
GREENVILLE
HAWLEY
KERENS
LA MARQUE
LA MARQUE
LA PORTE
LUBBOCK
LUFKIN
MANSFIELD
MARSHALL
MORGANS POINT
NACOGDOCHES
NEVADA
ORANGE
OVILLA
PALESTINE
PARIS
PORTLAND
SAN ANTONIO
SAN ANTONIO
SAN ANTONIO
SAN ANTONIO
SAN ANTONIO
SAN ANTONIO
SAN ANTONIO
SEADRIFT
SHERIDAN
SILVER
fALCO
TEXAS CITY
TFXAS CITY
WADSWORTH
WICHITA FALLS
YOAKUM

CACHE JUNCTION
LOGAN
SALT LAKE CITY

CABOT-MONTPELFR
WARREN

BUCHANAN CO
HILLSVILLE
MONTVALE
RICHMOND
DATE OP KILL



s
|


4
9
5
11
a
11
6
8
4
a
5
9
3
a
in
5
9
2
6
8
12
9
5
3
4
8
10
11
12
5
7
4
8
4
8
3
12
8
5
1

7
7
7

7
7

9
1
10
9




*


10
?7
4
8
3
8
20
17
23
4
13
26
12
18
20
13
23
9
22
17
2
13
2
5
15
21
21
10
14
28
30
26
23
1
25
12
1
23
1*
16

I
25
21

13
31

11
18
3
12




i


65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65
65

65
65

65
65
65
65

OPERATIONS
INDICATED AS

PON KILL
ISBE COOES
•BLOWI


31
23
31
42
22
31
11
11
24
31
31
31
31
23
31
25
31
25
50
43
11
25
41
25
13
13
13
13
13
31
11
24
25
25
25
24
50
13
25
25

11
50
30

22
28

22
31
44
31
TVPK op r ntt
KILLED


»>HCI«T
• AMB



10*
10*
50*
50*
10*
1*
5*
30*
10*



25*
10*
30*
20*

50*
20*

10*

35*
5*
50*
2*
5*
10*
-
-
60%
50*
-
5*
33*


5*
2*
85*

50*
75*
85*

_
95*


.




•inecMT
PORABB



90*
90*
50*
50*
90*
99*
95*
70*
90*
100*
100*
100*
75*
9n»
70*
80*
100*
50*
80*
100*
90*
1001
65*
95*
50*
98*
95*
90*
-
-
40*
50*
-
95*
67*'
100*
100*
95*
98*
15*

50*
25*
15*

_
5*

100%
.
100*
100*
j S
j S

*i§
S •
III


_
50*
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
80*
-
20*
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
—
-
30*
-
4*
-
"

-
-
"

-
"

•_
-
-
-


ESTIMATED
NUMBER
OP PBMI
KILLED



200
6.000
-
300
3.000
500
_
_
.
1 ,ono
-
5.DOO
200
~
2,000
.
_
_
.
50
.
_
-
_
_
1.000
-
-
500
1.000
10.000
_
500
_
_
-
500
500
-
15.000

800
250
1,750

_
500

200
-
-
-
SEVERITY


M
1-
^ t S t-
S i 1 !


3
3
4
4
.
4
4
3
4
4
2
3
2
3
2
4
3
4
1
-
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
3
4
3
3
2
3
2
3
3
-
4
3
1

2
1
1

2
4

4
_
2
2

ESTIMATES-

OR
APPECTW



IM
_
-
IM
2M
IM

4M
IM
_
IM
2M
IM
_
_
IM
_
5M
1A
IM
-
_
IM
IM
5M
-
5M
3M
2M
2M
3M
-
3M
5M
_
-
1A
IM
3M
"

4'b*
IM
10M

22M
IM

_
4M
3M
IM
,
»j

itC
S5t
•A I MM


- 10
1 -
2 -
1 -
1 -
- 12
3 -
2 -
2 -
_ _
2 -
1 -
_
2 -
- 3
- 12
1 -
1 -
2 -
- 4
3 -
5 -
- 6
3 -
3 -
-
2 -
2 -
2 -
1 -
3 -
-
- 7
20 -
2 -
1 -
1 -
1 -
-
"

4
- 4
1 -

4 -
- 6

_ _
_
.
- -

-------


RIVEN OH LAKB
AFFECTED


WASHINGTON
GREEN RIVER
STUCK R[VER
YAKIMA RIVER
WEST VIRGINIA
CEOAR CREEK
TYGART RIVER
FINNEY CREEK
TYGART RIVER
LITTLE KANAwHA R
NEW CREEK
POCA RIVER
THREEMILE CREFK
REFDY CRFFK
SPRING CRFFK
BIG SANHY CREEK
WEST FORK
WHEELING CREEK
WISCONSIN
TARRANT MILL POND
RIO CREEK
WYOMING
OCEAN LAKF
OCEAN LAKE
INYAN KARA CREEK


NBAHEBT TOWN
OR CITY



PALMER
SUMNER
YAKIMA

CEDARVILLE
DAILEY
DUNBAR
ELK.INS
GLENVILLE
KFYSER
POCA
POINT PLEASANT
REEOY
RENICK
ROCKVILLE
WESTON
WHEELING

CAMBRIA
RIO CREEK

PAV1LLION
PAVILLION
UPTON
DATE OF KILL



i
s

6
9
10

12
a
7
9
9
5
8
10
9
6
6
9
6

8
8

8
8
8



|


a
21
29

4
21
10
14
15
25
18
27
28
8
22
30
23

25
16

19
9
21



I


65
65
65

45
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65

65
65
65

OPERATIONS
HDICATED AB
RESPONSIBLE
FOR KILL

(SEE COOES
BELOW)


32
50
22

21
31
24
31
25
42
24
42
28
11
21
31
21

22
22

11
11
11
TTM OF FMH
KILLED


••CENT
• AMC


100*
100*
2*

50*
10*
2*
-
25%
10*
1*
5*
2*
50*
•>*
-
10*

55*
30*

97*
99*
15*


Pine (NT





98*

50*
70*
98*
-
75*
90*
99*
95*
98*
50*
95*
-
90*

45*
70*

3*
1*
85*
j s
«s>


III


_
-
~

-
-•
-
-
-
-
*
10%
-
-
-
-
"

_
~

_
-


ESTIMATED
NUMBER
OF FWH
KILLED


100
200
15,300

500
-
3.000
200
1 ,000
50.000
10.000
2.116
250
500
500
100
100

44.000
100

760
648

SEVBRITV



fill
111 11) (II HI

4
3
2

2
-

3
3

2

-
3
2
3
~

2
4

4
4
2

•BTIMATID
HILBS
OH
ACRES
AFFECTED


2M
5M
2M

2M
1M
1M
2M
1M
6M
-
1M
1M
2M
1M
1M
1M

4M
2M

7A
20A
5M
•k
o



•>* 1 MM
1

1 -
- 12
• ~

26 -
3 -
4 -
2 -
1 -
- -
- -
3 -
1 -
1 -
1 -
3 -
1 -

3 -
- 8

- 3
- 3

OPERATIONS CODES

10  Agricultural Operations
    11  Poisons (HerMcidei, PeiticMet. etc.)
    12  Fertilizers
    13  Manure, Silo, Feedlot Drainage, etc.

20  Industrial Operations
    21  Mlnlne
    22  Food & Kindred Products
    23  Paper  A Allied Products
    24  Chemicals
    25  Petroleum
    26  Metals
    27  Combinations
    28  Other

30  Municipal Operation*
    31  Sewerage System
    32  Refuse Disposal
    33  Water  System
    34  Swimming Pool
    80  Power

40  Transportation Operations
    41  Rail
    42  Truck
    43  Barge  or Boat
    44  Pipe Line

50  Other Operations

00  Unknown (See next table, p.26)
                          25

-------
Report  of Fish Kills—
       Cause Unknown
   Cumulative Listing of
        Reports Received
    as of Date of Listing


RIVER OR LAKE
AFFECTED



ALABAMA
SWEETWATER CREEK
CAIN CREEK
CALIFORNIA
NOYO HARBOR
PALO VERDE LAGOON
CONNECTICUT
CONNECTICUT RIVER
HAWAI I
KAPALAMA DR CANAL
ILLINOIS
KISHWAUKEE R-S RR
CAHOKIA CANAL
BEAUCOUP CREEK
INDIANA
MANSON-KINGRY DIT
8RANDYWINE CREEK
WILDCAT CREEK
PRAIRIE CREEK
KANSAS
FALL RIVER
MASSACHUSETTS
PIERPT MEADOW PND
UNNAMED FARM PONO
OXBOW POND
STOCKBRIDGE BOWL
MICHIGAN
PLASTER CREEK
MISSOURI
PRAIRIE CREEK
JAMES RIVER


NEAREST TOWN
OR CITV




FLORENCE
TUSCUMBIA

MENDOCINO
PALO VERDE

ROCKY HILL

HONOLULU

DEKALB
MADISON
PINCKNEYVILLE

GALVESTON
GREENFIELD
KOKOMO
LEBANON

EUREKA

DUDLEY
GROTON
NORTHAMPTON
STOCKBRIDGE

GRAND RAPIDS

AVA
CLEVER



1 >
t o


2 26
1 8

7 15
9 3

7 12

7 12

5 22
6 4
12 1

7 8
9 14
7 12
5 24

7 20

6 11
3 19
5 25
6 2

5 3

11 11
e 26



«
fel


65
65

65
65

65

65

65
65
65

65
66
65
65

65

65
65
65
65

65

65
65


OPERATIONS
INDICATED A*
RCIPOttHflLE
FOR KILL
•ELOn



90
90

90
90

90

90

90
90
90

90
96
90
90

90

90
90
90
90

90

90
90
TVF-EOF FISH
KILLED
PIRCKNT P««C«NT




_ _
47* 53*

50* 50*
35* 65*

20* 80*

100*

17% 83*
2% 98%
25* 75*

1% 99*
99* 1*
5% 95*
5* 95*

30* 70*

5* 95*
30* 70*
100*
100*

ion*

100*
20* 80*

j jj
i <
*$
&
Ssi
K8


_
32*

_
*

-

-

76*
100*
75*

_
_
-
-.

40*

_
_
_
-

-

„



ESTIMATED
NUMBER
OF FISH
KILLED




_
350

2.000
30.000

200.000

100.000

6.452
26,837
456

2.000
1.000
300
1.000

5.000

19
34
100.000
3.000

100

ion
2,000

teveniTy
u
T-
J >• « .
o 2 § I
t- i i -i
41) (1| (H 141

_
4

2
2

2

2

4
2
3

2
2
4
2

2

4
3
2
3

4

4
3


ESTIMATED
MILKS
OR
ACRES
AFFECTED



_
1M

-
~

20M

1M

4M
2M
1M

2M
1M
2M
3M

1M

-
1A
40A
30A

-

2M
2M

EL
o
li,
1- UO
2tr
SB*
QUM
	 .
DA 1 HH


.
1 -

- _
"" ~

2 -

4

- 18
-
"

1 -
- 12
1 -
1 -

1 -

- -
2 -
2 -
2 -

- -

_ -
1 -
   26

-------


RIVER OR LAKE
AFFECTED




NEBRASKA
PEBBLE CREEK S ?K
OBERST FARM POND
HASTINGS CITY LK
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NASHUA RIvF.R
NASHUA RIVER
NEW JERSEY
COHANSEY CREEK
METEDECONK RIVER
ENGLTSHTOWN POND
REP&UPO CREEK
MILLTOWN POND
AMBROSE BROOK
RAHWAY RIVER
MILLSTONE RIVER
SOUTH RlVFR
RAHWAY RIVER
TOMS RIVER
NEW YORK
GENESEE RIVER
OHIO
MIAMI RIVER
CUYAHOGA RIVER
ALUM CREEK
TURKFYFOOT CREEK
KILLBUC* CHEEK
BLACK RIVER
TEN-MILE CREEK
SAWMILL-MEANDER c
MIAMI RIVER
BFAR CREEK
CLEAR FORK
SCIOTO RIVER
BR WOLF CREEK
SUGAR CREEK
*5T JOSEPH BIVFB
OREGON
ASHLAND & BEAR CR
Q ST DRAIN DITCH
PENNSYLVANIA
LETORT SPRING CR
.LITTLE CONESTOGA


NEAREST TOWN
OR CITV





DODGE
FALLS CITY
HASTINGS

NASHUA
NASHUA

BRtDGETON
CEDARWOOD PARK
ENGLISHTOWN
GIBBSTOWN
MILLTOWN
NORTH STELTON
RAHWAY
ROCKY HILL
SOUTH RIVER
SPRINGFIELD
TOMS RIVER

ROCHESTER

BUTLER CO
CUYAHOGA CO
FRANKLIN CO
HENRY CO
HOLMES CO
LORAIN CO
LUCAS CO
MAHONING CO
MONTGOMERY CO
MONTGOMERY CO
'RICHLAND co
SCIOTO CO
SENECA CO
WAYNE CO
WILLIAM-; CO

ASHLAND
SPRINGFIELD

CARLISLE
EAST PETERSBURG



DATE Or KILL


X
1-
i


9
4
1

9
10

11
7
5
1
7
8
9
6
5
9

8

7
10
4
7
6
9
8
9
9
7
7
9
5
7

12
3

5
8



y
a


3
14
22

7
6

13
2*
19
21
•3"
23
21
2
23
23

21

28
27
4
23
?2
28
15
7
8
24
15
24
29
1
9

27
23

2
8



5
w


65
65
65

65
65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65

65
65
65 .
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65

65
65


OPERATIONS
INDICATED At
RESPONSIBLE
KILL

(SEE CODES
• CLOW)



90
90
90

90
90

90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90

90

90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90

90
90

90
90
TVPE OF FISH
KILLED

PERCENT
DAME





100*
100*





3*
15*
50*
100*

100*
5*



-
-
-
"
"
-~
-~
-
••
-
-
—
-


50*
10*

70*
70*

PERCENT
FORAQR




100*



100*
100*

100*
97*
85*
50*
100*
100*

959!

100*

-
-
~
—
~
—
~
-
•"
-
••
~
—


50*
90*

30*
30*

_, S
U
ta.n-1
°.*
H!D
i'S
c yl
SiS


.
-
"

-


-
-
_
-
_
-
-


-

-
-
"™
~

~
~
~
~
-
™*
~
~


-


-


ESTIMATED
NUMBER
or rwH
KILLED




300
30
5.000

-
•2.000

300
1.600
70
l.oon
40
250
50
40
50

1.500

-
920
13,413
45
523
"

4.855
*~
~
™
1.756
~
Z »94fi
2.192
3.213

4,200
100

200
400

SEVERITY
W
<
i 5 £ £
fe 5 8 »
f i i J
ID 11) (11 14}

4
4
2

3
3

3
2
3
3
4
2
4
4
4
4


1

-
-
~


~
""
—
~
~
~
"
~


1 '
1

3
3


ESTIMATED
MILES
ACRES
AFFECTED




1M
2A
8A

2M
1M

5M
1M
5A
4M
5A
1A
1M
-
IOM
1A

-

-

~
*

~
—
~
—
~
~
—
~


4M
1H

2M

o

f t «u
Oolti
	 r—
DA ! HR


1 -
-


- _
1

3 -
- 1 3
3 -
1
2 -
3 -
4
** —
4 -
- 12

* -

~ -
- -
-


^ *•
~" •"
PO —
^ — 1
— . —
-
*" ~
— —


1 -
- 2

1 -
1 -
27

-------
Report of Fish Kills-
       Cause  Unknown
           (Continued)

   Cumulative Listing of
        Reports Received
    as of  Date of Listing


MIVCR OH LAKE
AFFECTED



PENNSYLVANIA -CONT
LAKE ERIF
DARBY CREEK
TRIR KAERCHER CR
LACKAWANNA RIVER
CHICKIES CREEK
CONEWAGO CREEK
DELAWARE RIVER
PERKIOMEN CREEK
FURNACE CREEK
PENNS CREEK
COXES CREEK-E PR
DELAWARE RIVER
TENNESSEE
DUCK RIVER
LOOSAHATCHIE RIV
TEXAS
CRYSTAL BAY
UNNAMED STREAM
TRINITY RIVER
GREENS BAYOU
SULPHUR CREEK
CLEAR FK BRAZOS R
CHOCOLATE BAYOU
SOUTH BOSOUE
NAVASOTA RIVER
ALLIGATOR BAYOU
GALVESTON BAY
PINE ISLAND BAYOU
CARBIDE CANAL
GALVFSTON BAY
GALVESTON BAY
COLORADO RIVER
WICHITA RIVER
VIRGINIA
LINVILLE CREEK
WEST VIRGINIA
KANAWHA RIVER
KANAWHA RIVER


WAREST Ton
OR CITT




ERIE
FOLCROFT
HAMBURG
JEKHYN-MAYFIELD
MANHEIM
NEW CHESTER
PHILADELPHIA
RAHNS
ROBESONIA
SELINSGROVE
SOMERSET
YARDLEY

CENTEftVlLLE
MEMPHIS

BAYTOWN
COMANCHE
FORT WORTH
HOUSTON
LAMPASAS
LEUDERS
MANVEL
MCGREGOR
MIDWAY
NEDERLAND
SEA8ROOK
SOURLAKE
TEXAS CITY
TEXAS CITY
TEXAS CITY
WADSWORTH
WICHITA FALLS

BROADWAY

HENDERSON
SO CHARLESTON
DATE OF KILL




M
s

6
8
7
6
7
10
5
5
6
8
5
5

4
10

4
6
6
3
6
1
2
9
9
9
6
5
6
9
10
q
7

11

6
a




>
s

11
25
10
23
23
24
18
17
30
19
14
15

2
6

30
23
22
15
20
12
13
9
28
24
30
23
15
5
13
13
13

30





<
w

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65

65
65

65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65
65 '
65
65
65

65

25 65
19 65


OPERATIONS
INDICATED AS
RESPONSIBLE

BEE COOES
•ELOn


9C
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90

90
90

90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
90
96
90
90
90
90

90

90
90
TTPE
KIL


FCMCBNT
• AMK



100*

100*
80*
20*
30*
30*
50*
20*
100*
80S
100*





5*
15*
30*
20*
5*
15*
5*
50*
20*

10*
or FMH
tEO


PIMCBNT
F»RA«




100*

20*
80*
70*
70*
50*
80*

20*


100*
100*

100*
95*
85*
70*
80*
95*
85*
95*
50*
80*
100*
90*
160*
1*
5*
-
10*

10*

99*
95*
-
90*

90*

100*
20*
80*
M
j 3
j j
5 >
o°i
r»S D
is • *



_
-
-
-
—
-
-
-
-
-
-
—

_
5%

.
-
-
10%
-
-
5%
-
-
—
-
-
i
-
-
-
~

-

_
10*


ESTIMATED
NUMDER
OF FHM
KILLED



20
126,000
8.000
384
2.000
200
_
100
400
40
228
20.000

400
5.280

300
1,000
10.000
100
300
35
200
600
2.000
500
1.500
500
5.600
1.000
5.000
500
750

13.000

45,000
4,500
MVERirr

M
«
* % 5 **
6 3 ? 9


_
2
2
4
3
4
2
4
4
4
4
2

4
3

3
1
2
4
4
4
4
2
3
3
4
3
2
4
4
-
2

1

2
2


EETHSATED
MILES
ACRES
AFFECTED



1M
2M
1A
2M
-
1M
3M
1M
1M
-
2M
2M

_
1QM

_
-
4M
-
-
-
—
-
-
2M
1M
-
-
-
-
1M
2M

5M

2M
3M


fS5
vbf
2S«
• —
*A 1 MM

1 -
3 ,-
1 -
- 12
3 -
7 -
1 -
- 12
- 2
3 -
2 -
8 -

2 -
2 -

_
7 -
-
-
1 -
4 -
- —
2 -
2 -
1 -
- -
2 -
1 -
• 4
- -
1 -
1 -

2 -

3 -
2 -
   28
                                                                GOVERNMENT PRINTIMO OFFICE : 1966 O - 221-351

-------
                                                                                           -   4 .*.

f   ,

-------