United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
Office of February 10. 1977
Water Program Operations 430/9-76-011
Washington, D.C. 20460
&EPA
Cost Estimates for
Construction of Publicly-owned
Wastewater Treatment
Facilities
Summaries of Technical Data
CATEGORIES I-IV
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
MCD-48B
-------
Document Nunber Title and Content
430/9 — 76 — 010 "Cost Estimates for Construction of
(MCD-48A) Publicly-Owned Wastewater Treatment
Facilities -- 1976 Needs Survey"
This volume contains cost estimates
for needed publicly-owned wastewater
treatment facilities for eight Needs
Categories in each of the States and
Territories.
430/9—76—Oil "Summaries of Technical Data"
(MCD-48B) (Categories I-IV)
This volume consists of summaries of
technical data collected in the
course of the field work of the Needs
Survey in Categories I through IV.
430/9—76—012 "Summary of Technical Data For
(HCD-43C) Combined Sewer Overflow and
Storrnwater Discharge"
This volume contains the technical
rationale and supporting technical
data used for the estimation of needs
in Categories V and VI.
These Reports were prepared under the direction of:
James A. Chamblec, Chief
Needs Assessment Section (WH-547)
Office of Water Program Operations
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Washington, D.C. 20460
(202) 426-4443
Copies of these reports are available from the address below.
When ordering, please include the title and MCI) number.
General Services Administration (8FFS)
Centralized Hailing Lists Services
Bldg, 41, Denver Federal Center
Denver, Colorado 80225
-------
1976 WEEDS SURVEY
COST ESTIMATES
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLICLY-OWNED
WASTEVATER TREATMENT FACILITIES
SUMMARIES OF TECHNICAL DATA
(CATEGORIES I-IV)
February 10, 1977
-------
TABLE OF C01ITCNTS
Page
I, Introduce ion 1
II. Tables T-l
III. Figures F-l
Appendix I - Background and Methodology used
for Data Base AI-1
Appendix II - Survey Form AII-1
Exhibit A - Form EPA-1
Exhibit B - Code Reference Chart
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Purpose and Scope
In compliance with the provisions of the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, PL 92-500, Sections
205(A) and 516 (b)(2), the Environmental Protection Agency
submitted the cost estimates resulting from the 1976 Needs Survey
to Congress on February 10, 1977. This Technical Report is a
part of the 1976 Needs Survey report and is a supplement to the
Cost Estimate Report to the Congress. It provides summaries of
detailed technical and cost data reported in the Survey for
Categories I through IV. See Appendix I for a description of the
conduct of the 1976 Heeds Survey.
Historically, there has been a great deal of sustained
interest in the Meeds Survey data fron all levels of government,
quasi-governmental organizations, and industry. Costs as
determined in the Survey are primarily of interest because they
have historically been used by the Congress to provide relative
allocations of construction grant funds among the States. Other
interest, however, has been generated by the technical data used
in support of the cost data for several reasons:
1. These data have never existed before and permit analysis
not possible previously.
2. Unlike some other inventory files, these data are
updated biennially and are therefore current.
3. These data represent the best source of information of
its type existing today.
Due to this interest, each year EPA receives scores of
requests from various sources for data summaries. EPA has never
before published the Needs technical data. One of the purposes
of this document is to reduce the number of requests for special
data summaries by publishing the commonly requested information.
Another reason is the belief that the dissemination of this
information will generally aid the participants in the field of
municipal wastewater treatment.
Finally, EPA foresees that Needs data can be useful
particularly in the facilities planning process, and generally in
all aspects of wastewater treatment planning.
The scope of this report is limited to items reported
directly -to the Heeds Survey through the process described in
Appendix I. No data items are incorporated from other sources
except where noted. In an attempt to improve the quality or type
of data presented in this report, EPA welcomes comments and
discussion.
-------
B. Categories of Needs
Category I - Secondary Treatment and Best Practicable
Wastewater Treatment Technology - This includes costs for
facilities which Would provide a legally required level of
"secondary treatment" or "Best Practicable Wastewater Treatment
Technology (BPWTT)." For the purpose of the Survey, BPVJTT and
Secondary Treatment were to be considered synonymous.
The classification of wastewater treatment plants into
Category I in the 1976 Needs Survey was based on plant effluent
quality which meets the criteria in the Secondary Treatment
Regulations (40 CFR Part 133.102).
Category II - More Stringent Treatment - Costs reported in
this Category are for treatment facilities that must achieve more
stringent levels of treatment than secondary. This requirement
exists where water quality standards require removal of such
pollutants as phosphorus, ammonia, nitrates, and organic and
toxic substances; and/or where water quality standards require
more stringent levels of treatment for BOD and suspended solids
than is required by the Secondary Treatment Regulations.
Category IIIA - Infiltration/Inflow Correction - This
includes costs for correction of sewer system infiltration/inflow
problems. Costs could also be reported for a preliminary
analysis of infiltration and inflow for a sewer system and for
the more detailed sewer system evaluation survey.
Category IIIB - Sewer System Replacement and/or Major
Rehabilitation - Requirements for replacement and/or major
rehabilitation of existing sewer systems are reported in this
Category. Costs were to be reported if the corrective actions
were necessary to the total integrity of the system. Major
rehabilitation is replacement of or extensive repair of existing
sewers beyond the scope of normal maintenance programs.
Category IVA - New Collectors and Appurtenances - This
Category consists of costs for construction of collector sewer
systems designed to collect sewage and/or correct violations
caused by discharge of untreated wastewater into receiving water,
seepage to waters from septic tanks and the like, and/or to
comply with Federal, State or local regulations and special
actions.
Category IVB - Hew Interceptors and Appurtenances - This
Category consists of costs of new interceptor sewers and pumping
stations necessary for the bulk transport of wastewater to
treatment facilities.
Category V - Correction of Combined Sewer Overflow - Costs
reported for this Category are to prevent periodic bypassing of
untreated wastes from combined sewers to an extent necessary to
achieve water quality objectives and which are eligible for
Federal funding. It does not include treatment and/or control of
s tornwater.
-------
Category VI - Treatment and/or Control of Stormwater - This
includes the costs of abating pollution from stormwater runoff
channelled through sewers and other conveyances used only for
such runoff. The costs of abating pollution from stormwater
channelled through combined sewers which also carry sewage were
included in Category V. In the 1974 Needs Survey, Category VI
was added so the Survey would provide an estimate of all eligible
facility costs, as explicitly required by Public Law 93-243.
The 1976 Needs Survey was conducted on a
facility-by-facility basis for Categories I through IV.
(Appendix II includes a copy and a description of form EPA-1 used
for the Survey.) This document summarizes technical data from
Categories I through IV only. Detailed cost data for all
Categories and Survey methodology for Categories I through IV are
presented in "Cost Estimates for Construction of Publicly-Owned
Wastewater Treatment Facilities--!976 Needs Survey" (HCD-48A).
Detailed methodology and cost data for Categories V and VI are
presented in "Summary of Technical Data For Combined Sewer
Overflow and Stornwater Discharge," (MCD-48C).
C. Report Universe
Due to the large number of facilities in the United States,
each State was given a choice of two reporting options for
facilities in smaller communities:
1. All identified communities and facilities could be
reported, i.e., 100 percent reporting. Twenty-nine
States and Territories chose this option.
2. All communities within Standard Metropolitan Statistical
Areas (SMSA's), and all communities with 1970
populations equal to or greater than 10,000 were
reported. For the remaining communities outside SMSA's
and with 1970 populations of less than 10,000, the State
could choose to randomly select a sample proportion for
reporting. The minimum sample allowable was twenty
percent. Twenty-seven States chose this second sampling
option. The samples used in the 1976 Needs Survey range
from twenty to sixty-three percent.
During the 1973 Needs Survey, the sample communities were
selected from a computer listing of 1970 Census places outside
SMSA's with less than 10,000 population. The lists arranged
places within each State in order of population size from large
to small. The communities were selected from the lists at an
interval based on the intended sample percentage. For example,
if the intended sample was 25 percent, the selection interval was
one in four; i.e., every fourth community on the list was
selected.
-------
communities in
percentage was
twenty percent
in the 1974
For the 1976 Survey, the sarae sample groups were to be used
as in the 1974 Survey. However, the actual percentages of sample
populations were checked by comparing the total populations of
sample communities to the total populations of all
the State. The determination of the actual sample
to ensure that no sample States would fall below a
sampling level. States which had used a sample
Survey had the option to report a 100 percent basis only if the
additional needs had previously been identified by the State and
there was sufficient information already available to complete a
Survey form for each facility.
In most cases, the tables in this Report reflect the
expansion of the sample to simulate 100 percent reporting for
each State. In other cases, the tables include enumerations for
only the facilities actually chosen to represent a percentage
sample. Where data have been sample expanded, it is indicated in
the table descriptions.
D. Present and Future Needs
Two significant time periods pervade Needs Survey reporting.
These are the present, which means January 1, 1976, and the
future, which means the year 1990. All needs reported are in
present dollars to meet future needs. For populations, however,
the best available estimates are for July 1, 1975 and 1990. For
Needs purposes, the July 1, 1975 populations are considered to be
the current population, and the 1990 populations to be the future
population.
E. Metric Measure
All units shown in the technical summaries are in metric
units. Where space permits, English units are shown in
parentheses beside the metric measure. The following are the
most common units used in this report:
1. Flows are reported in thousands of cubic meters per day.
Millions of U.S. gallons per day are shown in
parentheses.
2. Per capita flows are shown in liters per day.
gallons are shown in parentheses.
U.S.
3. All tonnages of dry solids are shown in metric tons.
Mote that metric tons equals short tons x 1.1023.
Pipe diameters are shown in centimeters.
are shown in meters.
Pipe lengths
-------
II. TABLES
A. List of Tables
EPA-1
TABLE TITLE ITEM NO.
1 Number of Facilities by Nature 14b
of Facility
2 Number and Nature of Uastewater 14a, d
Facilities
3 Treatment Populations 16
3a Populations Served by Less Than 16
Secondary Treatment
3b Populations Served by Secondary 16
Treatment
3c Populations Served by Tertiary 16
Treatment
3d Populations to be Served by 16
Secondary Treatment
3e Populations to be Served by 16
Tertiary Treatment
4 Collection Populations 16
5 Numbers of Facilities Needing 15,16,23
Collector Sewers by Service-Area
Population and Per Capita Sewer Cost
6 Percent of Collector Dollar Needs by 15,16,23
Service-Area Populatio-n and Cost
Per Capita
7 Average Pipe Costs Based on Firm 17
Engineering Estimates or Previous
Comparable Construction
8 Total Pipe Length Needed by Diameter 17
9 Length and Cost of Pipe Based on 1990 17
Population to Receive Collection
10 Analysis of Liquid Effluent 18
Disposal
T-l
-------
11 Required I/I Corrective Actions 19
and Basis of Estimate
12 Dollar Needs for Required I/I 19
Corrective Actions by Basis of
Es tiraa te
13 Required Replacement and/or Major 21
Rehabilitation Actions by Basis of
Es tina te
14 Dollar Needs for Replacement and/or 21
Major Rehabilitation by Basis of Estimate
15 State Average Flow's 24
16 Number and Percent of Treatment 24
Facilities by Flow
Renoval Rates and Stream Loading 24
from Facilities Existing in 1976
17 All Facilities
17a Facilities Providing Less
Than Secondary Treatment
17b Facilitiajs Providing Secondary
Treatment
17c Facilities Providing Greater
Than Secondary Treatment
Removal Rates and Stream Loading 24
from Facilities Projected for 1990
13 All Facilities
18a Facilities Providing Secondary
Treatment
18b Facilities Providing Greater
Than Secondary Treatment
19 Number and Flow of Existing 25,26,27
Treatment Plants Which Will/Will'
Hot Meet Secondary Requirements
T-2
-------
20 Population, Flow, Removal Rates 25,26,27
of Existing Treatment Plants which
Will Hot/Will meet Secondary Requirements
21 Muiaber of Facilities and Reasons 28
for Treatment More Stringent Than
Secondary
22 Projected Change in Treatment 29
Process Use
23 Projected Change in Sludge Unit 29
Process Use
24 Present and Projected Daily 29
Sludge Volumes by Sludge Process
25 Treatment Process and Sludge 29
Handling Summary
26 Survey Sample Characteristics
T-3
-------
li. Explanation of Tables
TABLE 1 Number of Facilities by Nature of Facility
Table 1 lists the number of
description of the nature of
listed under the code "other" ref
treatment facilities or similar
treatment or collection systems b
5 (see Appendix II). The number
includes the current nature o
proposed nature of future facilit
sample expanded.
facilities for each State by
facility (Item 1 4b ) . Facilities
er to outfall sewers and sludge
facilities related to wastexjater
ut not described by codes 1 thru
of facilities in each type
f existing facilities and the
ies. Data in this table are
For the Needs Survey, combined sewers are defined as sewers
which carry both storm and sanitary was t ev/aters . Separate sewers
carry storm and sanitary wastes in separate pipes.
TABLE 2 llunber and Nature of Uastewater Facilities
Table 2 shows the total number of facilities, both existing
and proposed, by type and the nature of projected change. One
change is recorded for each facility. Since most facilities
include both treatment plants and sewer systems, the sum of the
number of treatment plants and sewer systems exceeds the total
number of facilities reported in the Needs Survey. Data in this
table are sample expanded.
TABLE 3 Treatment Populations
TABLE 4 Collection Populations
Two time periods are used in the Needs Survey for population
purposes. The first of these is the present, defined as the July
1975 population of the States as calculated by the Bureau of
Census in Publication T-25 (No. 615); the second is the future
or projected population, based, as in past Surveys, on the Census
Series I-E population projections for 1990. States presenting
evidence which showed, through State conducted censuses or other
means, that the 1990 population projections were too low, were
allowed to increase the 1990 ceilings used in the Survey.
Table 3 presents a summary compilation of treatment
populations by State. The table shows the present and 1990
projected resident and non-resident populations including those
receiving or not receiving treatment services. The table
contains the EPA approved 1990 ceiling populations.
Similarly, Table 4
collection populations.
present the corresponding data for
T-4
-------
In both of these tables, there occurs sone double counting
of populations due to the nature of the organization of
wastewater authorities. In many instances, the community sewer
system is under a different authority than is the treatment
plarit(s). As a result, two Needs Survey forms were completed.
In theory, the sewer authority would report no treatment
population, and the treatment authority no collection population,
In practice, however, this was sometimes forgotten. In addition,
the above example is a very simple one. Host treatment
authorities control at least some sewers, and many sewer
authorities treat sludge. Also, many treatment plants discharge
their effluent to another more advanced treatment plant. All
this results in some double counting of treatment and collection
populations in the Needs Survey.
Tables 3a thru 3e show populations served (present) and to
be served (1990), by level of treatment. Also included in the
tables are percentage comparisons of the present and projected
resident populations receiving treatment services, divided by the
total resident populations receiving and not receiving treatment
s ervices.
The totals presented in the tables have been extrapolated
from the sample where less than a 100 percent sample was used in
the 1976 Needs Survey, The totals do not necessarily include all
the people that reside or are projected to reside in a given
State, since some areas of a State nay be outside of identified
service areas. Also, it must be noted that the total collection
population for a given State may not be equal to the treatment
population because service areas sometimes cross State boundaries
and because sewer systems sometimes discharge to other sewer
systems, causing some double counting of populations.
Lastly, note that non-resident populations have been listed
separately. lion-residents include transients, commuters,
workers, vacationers, and other persons who must be served by
local systems even though they maintain no local residence.
Non-resident population does not include any form of "population
equivalent" based on industrial and/or commercial flows.
Non-residents are a serious consideration in a few areas of the
country; Florida and the District of Columbia are good examples.
TABLE 5 Numbers of Facilities Needing Collector Sewers by
Service-Area Population and Per Capita Sewer Costs
TABLE 6 Percent of Collector Dollar Needs by Service-Area
Population and Costs Per Capita
Tables 5 and 6 show the distribution of needed collector
sewer projects and Category IVA needs, respectively, by
service-area population and collector sewer costs per capita.
Table 5 shows the number of facilities requiring collector
sewers, while Table 6 shows the distribution of needs dollars by
percent.
1-5
-------
The projects are distributed by service-area population
which is based on the total present resident population receiving
and not receiving collection (EPA-1 Items 16(3)(a) added to 16
(4)(a)).
The collector sewer costs per capita are based on the
eligible resident population which need collection services.
TABLE 7 Average Pipe Costs Based on Firm Engineering
Estimates or Previous Comparable Construction
Table 7 presents the cost per meter for pipes of various
diameter by State. The costs selected were those based on firm
estimates, usually bid data or plans and specifications, and
previous construction costs comparable to local construction
conditions (Basis of Estimate codes 4 and 5).
Some anomalies occur in the data presented in this table due
to the small number of data points in some States, particularly
Alaska and Illinois. In addition, some States had no data at all
in this Category.
TABLE 8 Total Pipe Length Needed by Diameter
Table 8 shows, by State, the total length of pipe needed in
various diameter groups. The unit of length is in meters and the
unit of pipe diameter is in centimeters.
TABLE 9 Length and Cost of Pipe Based on 1990 Population to
Receive Collection
Table 9 shows for each State the total length by type, the
per capita length and the post per meter of new sewers. Per
capita values are based on the 1990 population receiving
collection. Data in this table .are sample expanded.
TABLE 10 Analysis of Liquid Effluent Disposal
Table 10 shows the numbers and the projected changes for the
various possible liquid effluent disposal methods. Since some
facilities utilize inore than one disposal method, the sum of the
numbers may not equal the total number of facilities reported in
the Meeds Survey.
Two disposal methods which were not anticipated at the start
of the Needs Survey, but which make up the bulk of the responses
under "other," are irrigation and discharge to another treatment
plant.
T-6
-------
In
systems
Data in
addition, the data presented includes separate sewer
which discharge to other treatment or sewer systems.
this table are sample expanded.
TABLE 11 Required I/I Corrective Actions and liasis of Estimate
TABLE 12 Dollar Meeds for Required I/I Corrective Actions by
Basis of Estimate
Tables 11 and 12 show the number of facilities reporting
infiltrat ion/inflow needs and the dollar amounts required,
respectively, by basis of cost estimate. It was not necessary
for respondents to provide a basis of estimate when reporting
costs for I/I analysis, resulting in a response of "none given."
Data in these tables are sample expanded.
TABLE 13 Required Replacement and/or
Actions by Basis of Estimate
Major Rehabilitation
and/or Major
TABLE 14 Dollar Needs for Replacement
Rehabilitation by Basis of Estimate
Tables 13 and 14 present Category IIIB needs by numbers of
facilities and dollar values, respectively. These tables show
that needs based on completed and preliminary engineering
estimates represent a majority of all Category IIIB needs
expressed in both tables. Data in these tables are sample
exp anded.
TABLE 15 State Average Flows
Present and projected flows by State are presented in Table
15, along with the percent increases anticipated between now and
1990. Industrial components and per capita flows are included.
Total flow includes domestic, commercial, industrial, and
I/I flows. Per capita flows are computed by dividing the total
flow minus industrial flow by the total resident and non-resident
treatment populations. Data in this table are sample expanded.
TABLE 16 Number and Percent of Treatment Facilities by Flow
.Table 16 presents the numbers of existing treatment plants
for each State by flow range. The percentage of the plants
in a given State within each range is also shown.
T-7
-------
TABLE 17 Removal Rates and Stream Loading from Facilities
Existing in 1976
TABLE 18 Removal Rates and Stream Loading from Facilities
Projected for 1990
The following parameters were used in these tables to
define treatment levels:
1. Less than secondary treatment substantially removes all
floating or settleable solids. It does not, hovjever,
exceed 84 percent removal.
2. Secondary treatment removes virtually all floating and
settleable solids and approximately 84-89% of both
five-day BOD and suspended solids or a specification of
effluent loadings of 30/30 for five-day BOD and
suspended solids. In this process, some phosphorus and
nitrogen pollutants are also removed, but these are not
included in the design removal. They are, however,
shown in the secondary treatment tables.
3. Tertiary treatment removes a high percentage of
suspended solids and also includes removal of nutrients
such as phosphorus and nitrogen.
A summary compilation of significant pollution parameters,
by State, is contained in Tables 17 thru 18b. Included are the
total existing influent and effluent loadings of five-day BOD,
suspended solids, phosphorus, ammonia, nitrogen, and other
reported constituents. Also included in the tables are the
currently reported removal rates of five-day BOD and suspended
solids. Data in these tables are sample expanded.
Table 17 contains data from all existing facilities; Table
17a, facilities providing less than secondary treatment; Table
17b, facilities providing secondary treatment; Table 17c,
facilities providing greater than secondary treatment.
Tables 18 thru 18b contain projected removal rates and
stream loading for facilities projected to be in operation in
1990.
Total loading quantities given in the tables are the
existing or projected loading data, where available, for
facilities that are projected to require limitations for the
indicated parameters. Totals for any particular parameter
include data for only those facilities for which effluent
limitations are projected for that parameter. For example, the
totals for phosphorus loading include data only for those
facilities that are projected to be phosphorus limited, and do
not include phosphorus loading data for other facilities.
Furthermore, because existing loading data or projected influent
data was unavailable for some facilities at the time of the
Survey, the tabulated quantities do not, in every case, include
loading data for all facilities for which effluent limitations
are projected. It should be noted that all loadings are given in
metric tons per day of dry weight.
T-8
-------
TABLE 19
TABLE 20
TABLE 21
Number and Flow of Existing Treatment Plants which
Will/Will Not Meet Secondary Requirements
Population, Flow, Removal Rates of Existing Treatment
Plants Which Will Not/Will Meet Secondary R.equi reraents
Number of
Stringent
Facilities and
than Secondary
Reasons for Treatment More
PL 92-500 requires that all States meet secondary treatment
levels or some more stringent level required by approved water
quality standards by July 1, 1977.
EPA-1 deal with the compliance
indicates the responses received to
flow for each State. These items
secondary treatment now and by July
whose requirements are greater than
Items 25, 26, 27 and 23 on
of this regulation. Table 19
these items by number and
show the facilities attaining
1, 1977 and the facilities
s econdary.
Table 20 summarizes the responses to EPA-1 Items 25, 26 and
27 by showing the population, flow and Item 27 responses for
those facilities which will achieve secondary treatment by July
1, 1977. For those not achieving secondary treatment by 1977,
the flow, population and combined five-day BOD and suspended
solids removal rates are included. Populations shown are the
current populations served by the facility.
Table 21 presents the reasons for treatment level
requirements being more stringent than secondary treatment (Item
28). Data in these tables are sample expanded.
TABLE 22 Projected Change in Treatment Process Use
TABLE 23 Projected Change in Sludge Unit Process Use
Table 22 gives, for each treatment process, the number of
facilities and associated flows by projected change under three
headings: now in use, under construction, and required but not
yet funded. Under the third heading, the totals include only
those facilities for which the specific processes were identifed
in completed or on-going facility plans Or other engineering
studies. In cases where required treatment levels indicated that
additional processes probably would be needed, but no planning
studies were available to identify the specific process, the
additional treatment was coded as "other treatment."
Table 23 shows the same data items for sludge handling
processes. Data in these tables are sample expanded.
unit
T-9
-------
TABLE 24 Present and Projected Daily Sludge Volumes by Sludge
Process
Table 24 presents the nationwide volumes of sludge currently
reported and projected for 1990. The tabulated values were
computed from the present and projected suspended solids
concentration reductions, flow data, and the indicated sludge
unit processes for each facility. Sludge volumes are given in
metric tons per day of dry weight. Data in this table are sample
expanded.
TABLE 25 Treatment Process and Sludge Handling Summary
Table 25 gives the total number of facilities and their
corresponding flows, by treatment and sludge handling process,
under three headings: now in use, under construction, and
required but not yet funded.
Under the third heading, the totals include only those
facilities for which the specific processes x^ere identified in
completed or on-going facility plans or other engineering
studies. In cases where required treatment levels indicated that
additional processes probably would be needed, but no planning
studies were available to identify the specific processes,
additional treatment was coded as "other treatment." Data in this
table are sample expanded.
TABLE 26 Survey Sample Characteristics
This table shows the characteristics of the sampling
techniques used to estimate needs outside of StlSA's and in places
of less than 10,000 population. See Section 1C for a description
of how samples were selected.
T-10
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1977
TABLE 1
NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER OF FACILITIES BY NATURE OF FACILITY
COMPLETE »AST£»ATEK COMPLETE »AST£wATER COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS
TREATMENT SYSTEM TREATMENT SYSTEM SEPARATE WITH KITH
WITH COMBINED SEWEKS HtTH SEPARATE SEwEHS TREATMENT PLANTS SEPARATE SEMENS COMBINED SEWERS OTHER
TOTAL (CODE 1) (CODE 2> (CODE 3) (CODE 4> (CODE 5) (CODE 6»
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AK1ZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIM. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
tttURSIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
HAHYLANO
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
MtbRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Hit JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NOHTH CAROLINA
NOHTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OKtSON
PENNSYLVANIA
HHUDC ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VEKMONT
VIK6INIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
• I SCONS IN
WYUM1N8
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
PUERTO HI CO
PAC. TR. TEKH.
VIHSIN ISLANDS
*1S
12*
180
4-37
1>OSO
221
150
45
1
503
BIO
55
2os
1.4.91
53T
1.120
43*
372
37*
Z37
352
251
783
756
227
826
1*5
329
85
160
55*
113
2.1*5
$61
357
990
456
152
Ii891
3*
«55
1*7
381
1.132
156
116
785
257
611
906
97
6
7
34
3V
*
U.S. TOTALS
2S.069
0
6
3
5
31
2*
41
7
0
3
9
1
6
989
31S
106
13
20
2
28
12
26
291
*92
6
30
38
2*
0
32
21
0
82
0
87
463
1
33
157
11
2
18
3
10
2
27
19
51
59
119
11
1
U
3
0
0
3.763
302
119
1ST
4-23
7b6
160
7*
23
1
323
S83
S»
as
116
166
992
*12
307
352
102
274
96
9*
88
208
738
97
297
64
67
214
101
882
*06
270
360
4*5
73
863
11
369
125
332
9S1
110
69
600
10*
*81
*81
75
5
7
31
39
1».9*7
8
0
3
0
14
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
0
0
1
16
0
2
0
0
2
2
19
0
49
4
0
*
2
7
52
0
IS
0
b
37
*
0
24
b
2
V
0
0
0
0
0
0
330
*5
0
15
8
205
33
32
13
0
69
ai
0
16
175
5*
19
S
37
18
72
32
10*
176
1*6
2
56
10
*
15
»2
249
11
581
106
0
139
7
10
692
6
35
0
35
130
*0
9
127
63
66
185
0
0
0
0
0
0
3(981
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
76
2
2
7
0
17
*
13
49
3
5
0
0
0
0
10
17
0
24
0
0
2
0
1
107
S
0
0
0
0
0
11
2
*
2
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
368
59
1
2
0
**
1
1
1
0
108
135
0
97
121
0
1
2
0
1
12
2*
a
165
11
6
0
0
2
3
7
3*
1
527
*3
0
1
0
27
17
1
3*
3
6
3
0
0
12
30
I
112
9
0
0
0
0
0
1»677
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER AND NATURE OF MASTEWATER FACILITIES
UNITED STATES TOTALS
FEBRUARY 10t 19TT
TABLE 2
•NUMBER OF FACILITIES*""""*
NUMBER OF TREATMENT SEDER
FACILITIES PLANTS SYSTEMS OTHER
•""•••"•"•"•"NATURE OF PROJECTED CHANGE""""""""""
ENLARGE
AND NED NO
ENLARGE UPGRADE UPGRADE CONST. REPLACE ABANDON CHANGE OTHER
EXISTING
16.895
13,228 15,519 1,13*
2.176 2.589 *,2SS 330 1,376 597 4,294 1,273
PLANNED
8.I8T
S.820 7,541 542
300 37
41 6,821
IB 6«1 303
TOTALS 25,082
19,041 23,061 1,677
2,477 2.636 4,297 7,151 1,380 615 4,955 1,576
-------
1976 NEEDS SUHVEY
TREATMENT POPULATIONS
PKtSENT. PHOJECTEO, RESIDENT I NONRESIDENT
I IN THOUSANDS )
FEBRUARY 10t 1977
TABLE 3
•••••• KECtlVINU THtATMENT •••«••
••• NOT HECEIYIN6 TREATMENT *••
PERCENT SERVED
1990
CEILING
STATE PUPULATION
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AHKONA
AHKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
OlSf. OF COLUM.
KLOHIDA
BfcOHGIA
HAKAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
10NA
KANSAS
KENIUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NtBHASKA
NEVADA
Ht» HAMPSHIRE
Nt» JERSEY
NtM MEXICO
NS» YOHK
NOHTH CAROLINA
NOKIH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
KMUUE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SUUtH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
ItXAS
UTAH
VEHMONT
V1HBINIA
HASHINSTON
•LSI VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
KYOMING
AMEHICAN SAMOA
UUAM
PUtKTO RICO
PAC. TH. TEKK.
VIHIilN ISLANDS
3.840
408
3.384
2.225
26.601
3.400
3.946
793
764
11.728
5.667
1.132
900
J3.177
6.433
3.043
2.509
3.741
4.149
1.142
5.318
7.052
10.961
4.577
2.349
5.488
747
1.562
933
1.019
0.822
1,300
21.799
5.880
606
13.202
2.943
13.342
1.134
3.023
643
4.800
15.351
1.509
536
5.958
4.194
1.84S
5.218
600
40
275
3.786
205
116
1975
RtS.
1.938
184
1.657
1.013
17.737
2.059
1.968
114
758
4.285
2.987
199
321
9.827
3.217
2.201
1.748
1.203
2.447
377
1.771
1.249
6.623
3.337
1.161
3.336
460
1.085
566
273
6.019
690
12.841
2.396
407
8.369
1.993
1.814
9.005
373
1.275
373
2.094
9.635
1.035
213
2.648
1.936
720
3.000
283
1
67
1.003
4
44
1975
NONRES,
113
4
120
2
1.114
147
34
357
1.142
715
189
18
3
583
554
100
1
55
26
73
905
51
282
48
3
852
35
It
80
43
417
54
3.326
207
0
191
0
0
636
40
297
8
242
83
11
42
435
362
22
137
1990
RtS.
3.442
408
2.632
1.979
24,519
3.400
3.384
254
763
10.966
5.106
V78
655
13.177
5.597
2,905
2.390
3.U17
3.896
687
3.980
2.891
10.754
4.447
2.143
5.335
748
1.495
933
663
8.822
1.257
18.757
4.504
407
12.732
2.884
2.943
12.861
768
2.436
412
3.470
15.351
1.484
338
5,35*
3.449
1.781
4.502
541
36
237
2.736
152
102
1990
NONRES,
256
14
217
5
2.018
476
50
785
1.463
1.653
J42
287
53
690
806
194
89
144
130
119
1.315
218
574
77
14
1.421
43
11
175
109
1.170
90
5.024
414
0
746
0
0
1.771
69
803
4
338
113
16
76
558
744
28
305
0
1
45
26
6
3
1975
RES.
399
13
98
104
1.215
12
633
46
0
ll2SO
270
117
71
238
482
77
131
563
136
150
325
647
1.386
341
187
181
34
21
17
126
770
36
1,879
319
0
800
136
295
937
153
309
3
409
720
16
60
399
378
201
191
0
27
33
1.132
1*
20
1975
NONRES.
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
40
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
2
0
37
0
3
4
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
74
0
10
0
1990 1990
RES. NONftES. 1976
233 0 53.6
0 0 52.3
10 0 74.5
0 0 47.9
61 0 83.7
1 0 81.3
455 0 63.6
12 21 19.8
0 0 105.9
166 0 51.3
11 0 60.6
18 0 23.1
0 0 39.2
50 0 88.2
45 0 60.6
0 0 76.7
0 0 77.1
62 0 35.4
0 0 64.6
123 0 35.7
68 0 43.2
578 j
21.4
325 0 72.3
109 0 85.0
4 0 49.5
0 0 70.0
8 0 61.6
0 0 70.2
0 0 95.6
1*1 S 33.4
149 i
0 (
I 82.3
60.2
815 4 70.9
165 0 44.0
000 64.2
47
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
107 20 77.8
0 0 73.5
0 0 79.3
327 0 76.1
85
6
0
46
0
0
56
169
114
1
40
0
2
21
1.025
4
9
40.3
4S.3
54.6
SO.l
78.7
85.8
45.4
53.3
54.6
40.0
65.1
75.9
4.7
55.5
32.9
3.4
50.6
1990
89.4
100.0
77.8
89.0
92.2
100.0
85.8
32.1
100.0
93.5
90.1
86.5
72.8
100.0
87.0
95.2
95.3
80.7
93.7
60.2
74.9
41.0
98.1
97.4
90.9
97.2
98.9
95.8
100.0
65.1
100.0
96.7
86.0
76.6
83.7
96.4
98.0
100.0
96.4
67.7
83.9
79.7
74.4
100.0
98.4
63.1
89.9
82.3
96.5
86.3
90.3
90.5
86.5
72.3
74.2
88.4
U.S. TOTALS
259.107 144.368 14.204 232.290 26.121
18.535
271
5,641
62
66.7
89.7
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
POPULATIONS SERVED BY LESS THAN SECONDARY TREATMENT
PRESENT, RESIDENT 4 NONWESIOtNT
( IN THOUSANDS )
FEBRUARY 10> 1977
TABLE 3A
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AHUONA
AKKANSA5
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
UISF. OF COLUM
fLOHIDA
OEOK8IA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORtH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OHE60N
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUtH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
•ESt VINSINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
BUAM
HUEHTO RICO
HAC. TR. TERR.
V IRS IN ISLANDS
1975
POPULATION
3,61*
362
2.22*
2,116
21.185
2,53*
3.0*5
579
716
8.357
4.926
865
820
11.1*5
5.311
2.870
2,267
3.396
3.7»1
1.059
4.098
5.828
9. 1.* 7
3.926
2.346
4.763
749
1,546
592
818
7.316
Iii47
18.120
6,451
63S
10.759
2,712
2. 288
11.827
927
2. Hie
bBJ
4.188
12.237
1.206
471
4.967
3.544
1.803
4.6DT
374
30
121
3.049
119
67
1975
RES.
141
130
127
642
8,536
120
389
15
0
365
727
57
178
650
417
1,063
1,156
280
1,108
77
79
3S6
957
205
511
2,407
242
319
39
143
1,548
72
4,643
265
77
2,339
709
2
3,461
73
259
131
393
237
IB
104
1,079
1,285
344
506
205
1
61
948
2
44
**•••» RECEIVINS TREATMENT «••••
1975
NONRES.
3
o
100
o
753
6
1
16
0
53
76
2
0
8
0
51
0
1
5
26
90
35
52
7
I
762
18
0
0
25
182
0
1.554
5
0
111
0
0
448
5
44
0
15
0
2
16
100
349
6
17
0
0
Z
0
1
3
*«• NOT RECEIVING TREATMENT ••»»
•• PERCENT SERVED •• NO. OF
1975
RES.
27
1
26
77
419
2
15
0
0
SO
65
55
56
38
4b
41
99
89
211
49
28
135
204
18
S3
81
19
6
2
42
183
8
268
52
0
176
73
0
159
25
73
1
140
11
0
36
233
230
130
b
0
27
22
923
6
20
1975
NONRES.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
11
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
o
o
o
o
o
o
i
i
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1975
3.9
37.2
5.7
30.3
40.3
4.8
12.6
2.7
0.0
4.4
14.8
6.7
21.7
5.8
7.9
37.1
51.0
6.3
29.2
7.4
1.9
6.1
10.5
5.2
21.8
50.5
32. 4
20.7
6.7
17.6
zi. a
6.3
25.6
4.9
12.2
21.7
26.1
0.1
29.3
6.0
9.2
19.2
9.4
1.9
1.5
22.2
21.7
36.3
19.1
11.0
55.0
4.
51.
31.
2.
50.
TREATMENT
PLANTS
25
13
23
*7
ISO
26
11
6
0
15
66
7
20
60
22
100
115
17
59
IS
25
21
35
27
44
126
34
42
15
14
51
6
169
29
21
62
127
1
70
6
97
48
29
31
5
23
190
80
57
94
22
2
2
19
4
2
U.S. TOTAL
216.530
40.271
4.617
39
18.b
2,451
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
POPULATIONS SERVED BY SECONDARY TREATMENT
PRESENTi RESIDENT I NONRESIDENT
( IN THOUSANDS )
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE 38
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
OIST. OF COLUM
CLOKIOA
BEORGIA
HAHAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IUKA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NtVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEM JERSEY
NtW MEXICO
NE» YORK
NORTH CAHOLINA
NUKTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OKEBON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TtXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIHUINIA
WASHINGTON
«ESr VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
•YOMIN6
AMERICAN SAMOA
UUAM
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERH.
V IRQ IN ISLANDS
1975
POPULATION
3.614
352
2.224
2. 116
zi.185
2.53*
3.095
579
716
8.357
4.926
865
820
11.1*5
5.311
2.870
2.267
3(396
3.7V1
1.0S9
4(098
5.826
9.157
3.926
2.346
4.763
746
1.546
592
818
7.316
1.147
18(120
S.4S1
635
10.759
2.712
2.208
11.627
927
2.816
683
4d8e
12.237
1.206
*71
4.V67
3(5*4
1(803
4.607
374
JO
121
,3. 049
114
87
197S
RES.
739
28
119
300
1.101
1(360
1.400
8
0
667
1.279
23
108
2(025
893
399
534
463
918
187
952
431
556
303
446
645
65
393
28
83
881
555
3(324
724
114
1(295
725
721
3(146
45
S34
•a
354
709
500
94
248
161
197
1(370
36
0
1
23
0
0
U.S. TOTAL
216(530
*»•»•* RECEIVINO TREATMENT ••*••
1975
NONRES.
76
0
14
0
87
105
1
11
0
50
61
2
3
156
7
9
0
20
7
26
619
6
22
18
2
86
6
4
2
8
86
54
617
114
0
10
0
0
80
0
179
6
36
1
8
23
32
8
0
75
0
0
0
0
0
0
2(754
••• NOT RECE1VIN6 TREATMENT ••*•
•• PERCENT SERVED ** NO. OF
32.523
1975
RES.
166
11
27
17
124
6
497
2
0
229
76
36
13
25
105
8
25
170
25
61
86
232
100
22
124
35
6
3
4
47
113
26
326
138
0
104
34
63
309
92
94
0
56
B6
7
17
42
39
49
109
0
0
7
95
0
0
4(109
1975
NONRES.
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
52
0
2
0
0
36
0
0
8
0
0
o
0
o
o
o
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
119
1975
20.5
8.0
5.4
14.2
5.2
53.7
45.3
1.4
0.0
8,0
26.0
2,7
13.2
18.2
16.8
13.9
23.6
13.6
24.2
17.7
23.2
7.4
6.1
12.8
19.0
13.6
8.7
25.5
4.8
10.2
12.1
48. 5
18.3
13.3
18.1
12.0
26.7
31.5
26.6
4.9
18.9
12.9
8.5
S.8
41.5
20.2
5.0
4.5
11.0
29.7
9.9
0.0
0.8
o.a
o.o
o.o
15.0
TREATMENT
PLANTS
78
4
43
18
172
70
62
9
0
19
89
10
11
72
70
72
20
43
67
37
45
37
71
103
19
73
7
34
20
26
58
22
165
39
42
134
18
20
?.**
4
82
21
80
100
28
33
121
23
65
1£9
'4
0
1
3
1
0
2.838
-------
1476 NEEDS SURVEY
POPULATIONS SERVED BY TERTIARY TREATMENT
PRESENT. RESIDENT & NONRESIDENT
( IN THOUSANDS )
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE 3C
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS)
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
UELAnARE
UlSf. OF COLUM
FLORIDA
UEOH6IA
HAdAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
IN01ANA
IO*A
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MKHI8AN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NfcBNASKA
NLVAOA
NE» HAMPSHIRE
Mtu JERSEY
NtW MEXICO
Nf-» YORK
NORTH CAHOLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
UREUON
HtNNSYLVANIA
HUOUE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TbXAS
UTAH
VfcKMONT
VIRGINIA
VASHINliTON
»tbT VIRGINIA
•IJStONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
PJERTO RICO
PAC. TH. TtHH.
VIHUIN ISLANDS
1975
POPULATION
3.614
352
~HZi.lt
2.116
villas
2.5.J4
3.0V5
579
716
B.3S7
4t926
865
mo
H.Ub
5.311
2.870
2.267
3.396
3.791
1.059
4.098
5. Bib
9.157
3t926
2.346
4.763
7*8
1.546
592
818
7.316
1.147
18.120
5i*51
635
10.759
2.712
2.288
11.827
927
2.818
6113
4.188
12i237
1.206
471
4.967
3.544
1.8U3
4.607
374
30
121
3.049
119
87
1975
RES.
872
1
428
23
5.593
502
73
88
758
2.814
565
30
24
2.357
1.215
345
11
164
368
60
700
266
1.419
458
153
144
14
334
492
2
3.268
0
3,924
1.083
129
3.534
335
487
1.64b
62
373
125
469
7,592
279
11
954
296
160
676
19
0
4
6
1
0
U.S. TOTAL
2K..S30
*•*•»* RECEIVINO TREATMENT «••••
1975
NOMRES.
19
0
1
2
214
33
15
329
1.142
453
38
12
0
97
206
16
0
12
13
17
193
5
178
12
0
3
1
10
76
3
60
0
1,077
62
0
67
0
0
105
I)
56
1
53
69
0
0
59
3
15
21
0
0
0
0
II
0
4.765
••• NOT RECEIVING TREATMENT •*••
•• PERCENT SERVED ** NO. OF
1975
RES.
152
0
32
1
560
Z
85
45
0
809
104
11
0
114
123
13
4
SO
HO
21
204
217
440
49
3
54
3
10
10
13
434
0
1.185
104
0
449
16
177
354
Zi
78
1
186
470
6
3
63
83
17
36
0
0
3
29
8
0
45,733
1975
NONRES.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
40
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
37
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
8
0
0
11
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
102
1975
24.1
0.5
19.2
1.1
26.4
19.a
2.4
15.2
105.9
33.7
11.5
3.6
3.0
21.2
22.9
12.0
0.5
4.8
9.7
5.7
17.1
4.6
15.5
11.7
6.5
3.0
1.9
21.7
83.2
0.3
44.7
0.0
21.7
19.9
20.4
32.8
12.4
21.3
13.9
6.7
13.3
18.3
11.2
62.0
23.2
2.5
19.2
a.4
a.9
14.7
5.2
0.0
3.6
0.2
1.3
0.0
21.1
TREATMENT
PLANTS
26
2
7
6
153
36
21
9
1
142
43
11
2
225
67
21
10
16
10
17
59
2S
41
36
8
7
7
33
8
5
85
0
145
62
6
214
20
35
157
2
45
19
102
403
28
7
157
4
a
155
4
0
1
1
2
2,719
-------
1976 NEEDS 5UKVEY
POPULATIONS TO BE SEHVED BY SECONDARY TREATMENT
PROJECTED. RESIDENT & NONRESIDENT
( IN THOUSANDS )
FEBRUARY lOt 1977
TABLE 3D
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ANUONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFOHNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
OtLAHARE
UISI. OF COLUM
FLQNIDA
IJEOKSIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOKA
KANSAS
KENIUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Nt* JERSEY
NE« MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAHOLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OKE60N
PENNSYLVANIA
KHOUE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TfcXAS
UTAH
VtRMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
VEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMEHJCAN SAMOA
GUAM
PUEHTO ftCO
HAC. TR. TERH.
VIHtilN ISLANDS
1990
POPULATION
3.850
406
3>384
8(225
26(601
3(400
3(9*6
7»3
76*
11(728
5(667
1.132
900
13(177
6.433
3.053
2.509
3.7*1
4.159
1.142
5.3IB
7,052
10(961
4.577
2.359
5(488
757
1(562
V33
1(019
8(1122
1.300
21,799
SlB80
606
13*202
2.942
2,943
13(342
1(13*
3,023
643
4(800
15,351
1,609
536
b.958
4llV4
1,845
5.218
600
40
275
3(786
205
116
1990
RES.
1.743
170
1.23S
857
7,950
1,191
2(729
0
0
2,472
1(686
550
564
575
525
1(024
1(536
1,150
2,664
391
42
1.674
6,208
797
750
4(766
377
295
101
326
1,677
1,080
8,247
1,077
277
861
510
a26
4,923
*72
1,183
166
719
420
0
288
2,046
2(07*
1(233
1(480
418
36
99
1(622
135
102
U.S. TOTAL
259,107
•••••• RECEIVING TREATMENT •••»t
1990
NONRES.
196
2
205
0
1,043
156
35
0
0
354
130
110
S3
39
52
54
15
26
61
97
0
170
107
16
5
1(368
20
0
7
68
S41
90
1.B23
170
0
83
0
0
210
61
396
0
54
0
0
87
143
621
s
84
0
I
41
0
5
3
8(797
••• NOT RECEIVING TREATMENT ••*«
•* PERCENT SERVED ** NO. OF
76(345
1990
KES.
34
0
10
0
a
l
339
0
0
12
1
13
0
0
9
0
0
17
0
69
0
265
133
11
2
0
8
0
0
64
6
0
248
64
0
1
0
0
118
40
0
0
9
0
0
37
89
28
0
1
0
2
11
617
0
9
2,290
1990
NONRES.
0
0
0
0
0
0
(I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
1990
45.3
41.8
36.5
38.6
29,9
35.0
69.2
0.1
0.0
21.1
29.8
48.7
62.7
4.4
8.2
33.5
61.3
30.7
64.1
34.3
0.8
23.7
56.6
17.*
31.8
86.8
*9.9
18.9
10.9
32.1
19.0
83.)
37.8
18.3
*5.8
6.5
17.4
28.1
36.9
41.7
39.1
25.9
1S.O
2.7
0.0
53.9
34.4
49.5
66.9
28.4
69.7
90.S
36.0
42.9
65.9
88.4
29.5
TREATMENT
PLANTS
131
115
136
47
4*5
116
68
2
0
18
114
33
84
42
42
232
107
54
143
88
25
65
107
125
36
227
42
56
51
55
26
29
454
47
83
51
45
11
387
13
80
78
117
34
0
69
296
121
431
241
25
5
3
18
37
4
5(515
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
PROJECTED. RESIDENT I NON
i IN THOUSANDS >
1990
STATE POPULATION
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
UIST. OF COLUH.
FLORIDA
6EONOIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA '
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEK HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEK MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORfM DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
KMOOE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUtH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMtKICAN SAMOA
GUAM
HUEHTO «ICO
KAC. TK. TERR.
VIWG1N ISLANDS
3.8SO
408
3,384
2 .225
26(601
3,400
3.946
793
764
11,728
5(667
If 132
900
13(177
6,433
3.053
2*509
3.741
4,159
1.142
5(318
7.052
10.9*1
4.ST7
2(3«9
5.488
757
1(562
933
1.019
8.822
1.300
21.799
5.880
606
13(202
2,942
2(943
13(342
1(134
3(023
643
4(800
15(351
1(509
536
5(958
4(194
1(845
5(218
600
40
275
3(7116
205
116
1990
RES.
1.3S9
32
149
1(121
14(672
2(111
478
254
763
7(741
3(148
425
85
12(714
4(985
1(565
265
1(557
1(221
170
3(926
BIS
3(655
3(226
886
412
29
1(140
313
336
7.678
125
9.148
2(992
210
11(587
1.670
2(556
6.978
203
1(111
318
1(932
14(907
1(484
47
2.B83
1.007
524
2.525
24
0
21
840
17
0
U.S. TOTAL
259(107
•«•••* RECEIVIN8 TREATMENT •»•••
1990
NONRES.
30
0
12
5
B78
296
15
785
1(463
1(112
205
153
0
627
754
132
0
81
62
4
1(315
26
428
34
9
41
1
10
116
41
265
0
3.109
241
0
662
0
0
1(515
5
379
4
130
113
16
19
159
94
23
188
0
0
0
26
1
o
15,605
140.568
IARY TREATMENT
IESIOENT
NOT RECEIVING
1990
RES.
17*
0
0
0
51
0
96
12
0
109
10
S
0
38
36
0
0
4*
0
23
68
271
175
9$
0
0
0
0
0
77
141
D
544
89
0
106
0
0
174
42
4
0
25
0
a
18
19
B5
0
37
0
0
1
347
4
I)
2.997
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE 3E
TREATMENT *••• •• PERCENT SERVED
1990
NONRES.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
2
0
0
20
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
a
a
0
u
a
0
so
1990
3S.3
7.9
4.4
50.4
55.2
62.1
U.I
32.0
100.0
66.0
SS.6
37.6
9.5
96.5
77. 5
51. 3
10.6
41.6
29.4
15.0
73.8
11.6
35.2
TO. 5
37.6
7.5
3.9
73.0
33.6
33.0
87.0
9.7
42.0
SO. 9
34.8
87.8
56.8
86.9
52.3
17.9
36.8
49.6
40.3
97. 1
96.4
8.9
48.4
24.0
28.4
48.4
4.1
0.0
T.9
22. 2
B.3
0.0
54.3
•• NO. OF
TREATMENT
PLANTS
3T
2
1*
77
177
34
26
16
1
139
100
8
5
447
272
59
22
50
30
28
252
42
85
76
31
11
10
62
10
38
102
2
377
96
8
467
139
42
305
6
190
27
177
564
105
22
201
13
92
286
3
0
2
11
2
0
5.402
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
COLLECTION POPULATIONS
PRESENT. PROJECTED, RESIDENT & NONRESIDENT
( IN THOUSANDS >
FEBRUARY 10.1977
TABLE »
**»•»* RECEIVING COLLECTION •••••
•*• NOT RECEIVING COLLECTION *••
PERCENT SERVED
1990
CEILING
STATE POPULATION
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AKUONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
USLAKARE
OIST. OF COLUH.
KLOKIDA
BEOR81A
HAMAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IODA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARTLANJ
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
Him HAMPSHIRE
NEK JERSEY
NE« MEXICO
NEK YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUIH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
rtXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRSINIA
•ASHIN6TON
NEST VIRGINIA
•ISCONSIN
•YOHJNS
AMERICAN SAMOA
ttUAM
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TH. TERR.
VIRBIN ISLANDS
3. BSD
408
3.384
2.225
26.601
3.400
3.9*6
TVS
764
11.726
5.667
1,132
900
13.177
6.433
3. OSS
2.S09
3.741
4.1S9
1.142
5.318
7.052
10.961
4.S77
2,369
5.488
757
1.562
933
1.019
8,822
1.300
21.799
5.880
606
13.202
2.942
2l«43
13.342
It 134
3,023
643
4.800
15,351
1.509
536
5.958
4.194
1.845
6.218
600
40
275
3,786
205
116
1975
RES.
1.462
184
1.624
If 048
17.866
2.377
1.961
424
758
4.560
3.089
221
442
11.145
3.340
2.217
1.766
1.624
2.592
541
2(847
3.913
8.112
3.926
1.160
3.398
460
1.112
566
436
6,354
690
13.009
2.447
406
».7Z3
1.995
1.866
9.140
951
1.344
372
2.093
9.658
1.036
223
2.360
2.179
731
4.162
283
1
67
1.025
4
44
1975
NONKES.
123
3
121
2
1.410
ui
35
46
223
832
221
2tt
7
911
553
47
1
S4
63
79
1.004
101
350
63
3
856
35
15
81
70
636
54
4.808
267
0
210
6
0
265
5
306
8
245
17
5
45
194
437
22
115
0
0
8
0
1
3
1990
RtS.
3.b59
408
2.543
2.021
2»,S3b
3.400
3.391
721
763
11.728
5.205
1.085
900
13.177
6.031
3.010
2.509
2.998
4.076
926
5,318
5.942
10.961
4.577
2.153
5.439
757
1.562
933
805
8.770
1.260
18.825
4.727
b07
13.202
2.899
2.943
13.342
994
2.677
512
3.599
15.351
1.485
J65
5.958
4,194
1./94
5,218
542
36
252
2.736
152
102
1940
NONRES,
268
14
218
5
2.192
471
46
337
235
1.904
429
274
72
1,221
816
141
4
135
111
148
1.360
308
787
196
14
1.188
43
11
175
165
1.475
92
5,789
476
0
789
0
0
723
19
812
4
347
40
20
82
561
«31
25
305
0
1
45
26
6
3
1975
RES.
473
16
124
107
1,432
16
750
78
0
1,735
352
96
100
412
590
87
133
501
76
226
291
982
2,210
489
189
184
37
22
36
193
720
44
3,046
302
0
1,167
137
648
707
229
347
2
417
735
15
57
263
427
82
417
0
27
33
1,110
14
20
1975
NONRES.
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
39
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
3
4
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
74
0
14
0
0
59
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
1
2
0
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
1990
RES,
254
0
10
0
90
0
584
55
0
379
49
19
0
157
43
2
0
62
0
185
70
842
569
122
4
0
a
0
0
194
242
0
1,742
203
0
103
8
0
559
115
12
0
47
4
0
64
246
6
2
47
0
2
21
1.025
4
9
1990
NONRES,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
621
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
a
0
5
0
0
20
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1»76
54.3
52.5
73.0
49.6
84.3
93.8
63.4
73.4
105.9
54.6
62.7
25.6
54.0
100.0
62.9
77.3
77.9
47.8
68,4
51.2
69.5
67. a
aa.6
100.0
49.5
71.4
61.5
72.0
95.7
53.4
86.9
60.2
71.8
44.9
64.1
90.4
7J.fr
81.6
77.3
59.5
47,7
54.6
50.0
78.9
85.9
47.4
47. S
61.5
40.6
90.4
75.9
4.7
55.5
33.6
3.4
50.6
1990
92.4
100.0
76.6
90.8
92.2
100.0
86.0
91.0
100.0
100.0
91.9
95.9
100.0
100.0
93.8
98.6
100.0
BO. 2
98.0
HI. 2
100.0
84.3
100.0
100.0
41.3
99.1
100.0
100.0
100.0
79.1
99.4
96.9
86.4
80.4
83.7
100.0
98.6
100.0
100.0
87.7
88.6
79.7
7S.O
100.0
«e.S
68.3
100.0
100.0
97.3
100.0
90.4
90.5
91.7
72.3
74.2
88.4
U.S. TOTALS
259,107 157.434 15,173 243,425 25,783
22,929
255
8,228
72.7
44.1
-------
COLLECTOR
S£»E« COST
S/CAPITA
0-1U
10-25
25-50
50-100
100-150
1SO-20U
200-25U
250-300
300-400
400-SOO
500-600
600-700
700-BOO
800-VOO
900-1000
>100U
TOTAL
ar
0-999
0
1
1
5
9
a
20
12
45
191 ,
30
3V
4b
31
23
149
6)2
1V76 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBERS OF FACILITIES NEEOIN3 COLLECTOR SENERS
StHVlCE-AREA POPULATION AND PEN-CAPITA SEMER COST
Ii000-4i999 S«000-»t999 10 (OOU-4V>V9V
2
2
15
25
43
28
50
39
123
554
144
174
171
105
43
373
1.891
3
1
7
23
20
23
21
IS
48
178
72
103
62
34
26
160
796
4
5
17
47
36
36
44
4V
10V
317
153
104
81
41
44
265
1>352
FEBRUARY
TABLE s
50K-100K
J
2
b
7
6
V
6
7
21
58
2S
11
16
5
3
31
215
lOi 1977
>10UK
2
1
3
4
2
3
12
5
V
37
22
r
6
5
2
16
136
TOTAL
14
12
48
111
116
107
ISj
127
3bS
1.33S
446
4Jtj
384
221
141
994
-------
H76 NEtOS SURVEY FtBKUAHY 10.1977
TAdLe 6
PtMCtNT OF COLLECTOR UOLLAK NEtDS HY SKHVICE-AHhA POPULATION AND COST/CAPITA
COLLtCIUH
btKtK CUbl
4/CACITA
0-10
1U-2S
25-bU
iO-100
100-150
1!>0-201 ouu
roTALb
0-444 1, 000-4. MQy
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.3
0.1 0.3
0.3 0.7
0.9 0.*
1.1 O.v
0.1 l.J
2.S *.J
11.7 lb.6
4.0 7.V
6.B t.V
V.I 7.K
4.2 ».«
4.1 3./
!>4.3 42. «
100.0 100.0
SfOOO-V.994 10<000-49i9VV
0.0 0.0
0.0 0.0
0.1 U.2
0.7 u.b
1.1 J.B
1.0 0.4
1.0 1.1
l.» i.a
».H 6.0
14.il U,b
•*.« V.2
11. S 6.1
7.7 6.9
4.7 b.2
4. SI 3.V
Jfc.7 43.4
100.0 100.0
bOK-lOOK
0.0
0.2
0.6
1.1
0.4
1.1
1.2
2.b
tt.l
ltt.3
17.3
7.3
14.8
3.S
0.9
22.6
100.0
>100K
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.6
0.2
O.j
4.4
Z.b
3.6
17.4
6.7
Z.5
14.1
22.8
3.2
21.0
100.0
-------
FEBRUARY 10, 1977
TABLE 7
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
AVERAGE PIPE COSTS BASED ON FIRM ENGINEERING ESTIMATES OR PREVIOUS COMPARABLE CONSTRUCTION
MEAN COST PER METER BY DIAMETER OF PIPE IN CENTIMETERS
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARI/ONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
D1ST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE. ISLANU
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
NEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
PUERTO HI CO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
15-31
<6'-lZ«)
74.13
233.72
63.23
72.46
61.89
139.05
84.27
278.98
67.46
294.48
65.13
73,75
94.20
71.19
66.00
82.13
114.50
113.88
122.19
136.17
85.41
72.29
111.94
81.55
126.83
141.18
383.47
114.29
60.48
126.25
100.92
136.07
61.10
58.65
36.48
118.60
72.22
174.66
56.36
97.09
37.25
98.11
31.1-54
(13--21-)
487.46
55.03
51.71
250.51
567.65
V4.27
V3.73
173.20
82.75
110.72
162.19
202.92
148.42
208.39
193.20
283.40
115.04
220.06
442.26
1.237.31
202.56
93.84
158.23
141.36
255.94
91.88
73.65
79.33
148.01
54.1-77
(22»-30»)
492.12
64.35
173.50
303.58
568.98
131.76
495.50
458.68
248.48
173.26
247.51
229.65
392.43
239,93
184.88
246.70
274.31
198.34
666.39
258.43
287,24
150.27
187.19
218.71
289.53
132.17
143.35
191.33
167.58
271.46
77.1-107
<31"-42»>
492.12
181.43
473.25
225.31
322.43
181.51
301.68
464,09
376.71
234.59
455.81
176.88
228.56
486,78
442.14
164,22
306.47
326.47
169.44
261.98
740.17
320.17
381.12
107.1-122
(43"-4B»>
492.12
315.07
319.41
416.09
875.21
413.26
627.79
495.83
3,165.02
467.07
188.95
725.78
404.05
122.1-200
(49"-78">
1.251.01
777.92
366.63
357.48
328.08
572.93
4S7.83
791.26
612.42
10,957.21
722.61
532.15
447.37
301.53
442,40
501.12
200*
(79-U)
2,709.97
4,513,99
730.41
410,10
4.696.44
27,211.97
1,960.97
410.18
UNITED STATES MEAN
118.19
224.90
233.35
330.33
343.91
436.14
2.716.27
-------
15-31
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
TOTAL PIPE LENGTH NEEDED BY DIAMETER
(LENGTH IN METERS(OIAMETER IN CENTIMETERS!
31.1-5*
5*.1-77
<22>'-30''l
77.1-107
Ul"-*2»>
FEBRUARY lOt 1977
TABLE 6
107.1-122
<*3"-*8")
122.1-200
(*9"-78»)
200*
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELANAKE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEC HAMPSHIRE
NED JERSEY
NED MEXICO
NEK YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
•EST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
6UAM
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
UNITED STATES TOTALS
3,280,033
37*. 822
1,689.400
1(030(278
8,444.410
2*3(578
3.375.997
360(381
7(141 .373
3(311(118
1(201(737
1(249(315
2.101.420
2(703(180
878.256
881(661
2,276(199
1(627(631
1,566(600
1(365(697
5(578(623
*, 063, 589
1(5*7(963
601(800
1,390,471
229,128
236(493
550(115
2(216(635
3,665(208
286(607
9,845(084
1,857(113
38.633
4,733.408
1(192(8*8
1,110,485
10,5*7.*32
1(039(81*
3,862(707
98(529
3,824(311
7,607(273
963, V28
716(698
4(286(170
2(946(466
10,066(74*
3,091,778
60,896
75.218
230(077
1.591.925
388(516
177(8b8
36,023.652
276.913
67(593
71(387
137(538
707(966
150(838
319(085
60(0*1
1.011(506
600(1*2
272.468
350(36*
502.5*2
329(700
135(036
150(53*
279(388
201(886
208(905
537(551
521(088
1. Ob*. 430
205(680
1*5,328
205.119
31(5*6
*5(26*
39(580
221,479
182(588
*6(81*
894(865
518(297
8(660
1,625(446
90,285
2*8(070
4B6.518
230(618
733(786
33(015
518(906
994(206
302(404
13(992
595(826
207(890
9*7(554
390(847
15(866
11(149
209(088
2(362
7(635
18.234(812
126(714
9(143
77(862
54(680
604(976
85(891
117(023
49(730
425(902
291(469
133(137
114(235
186(551
128(583
103(153
2T.750
118(305
233(317
34(503
405(534
511(167
291(707
43(433
109(697
110(258
57(241
22(226
18(438
124(858
208(879
37(261
643(232
281(246
6(339
688(32*
50,018
314( 174
240,030
82(494
318(519
11(225
175(570
662(856
76(138
8(148
322(879
278(273
61(481
281(459
5(486
79(895
7(924
283(486
3(387
9(748(234
64(709
29,50*
95,137
36(416
511(269
66(10*
17(059
ll(*28
1(502
328(22*
97(76*
23.635
212(846
194(687
226(589
62(215
114(669
37,917
72(770
75(563
143(265
346(470
114(768
116(505
88(278
66(659
151(208
14(428
21(232
83,168
19(470
18*. 813
116(890
8(107
5** (263
58(306
348(970
66(439
147,367
35(653
148(000
320,782
1(66*
1(523
164(690
306,121
166(895
135(404
6(201(369
152
6(095
8,072
6.095
*(876
16(1*5
46,899
28(*82
18,39*
76(199
42,286
127,427
13(990
89(077
103(81*
15(377
26(138
10,*36
50(977
86(967
1(889
9(180
102(031
301(*7*
109,225
8(229
183(916
32(781
91*
26(761
31.112
120.170
17(015
120(8**
72(375
1(915(832
10(058
2(397
69,220
233(05*
*(169
3(657
128(229
75(369
45.196
59,827
6(96*
609
64.951
14.173
3(0*7
45,915
56(397
264,859
39(806
67(679
6S(**0
22(299
27(060
15(575
80(729
86,470
81(137
275(889
81,»*2
91(719
4,114
15(880
24,018
590.306
10(058
7.450
99(910
60
127(966
2(903(115
81(9**
152
1 (*52
13(719
9.*18
5(181
10,»2*
18(409
6(095
17(321
6(900
31(39*
56(8*5
1(707
36(166
110(762
91(452
1(969
11(726
9,695
522(741
-------
STATE
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE V
19T6 NEEDS SURVEY
LEN6TH AND COST OF PIPE BASED ON 1990 POPULATION TO KECEIVE COLLECTION
TOTAL LENGTH IN METERS PER CAPITA LENGTH MEAN COST PER METER (DOLLARS)
COLLECTOR INTERCEPTOR ALL PIPE COLLECTOR INTERCEPTOR ALL PIPE COLLECTOR INTERCEPTOR ALL PIPE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AHIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CUNNECTICUT
DELAWARE
UIST, OF COLiJM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
MA HA II
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LUUJSIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MON1ANA
NEBHASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEK JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
ORE60N
PENNSYLVANIA
HHOOE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
6UAM
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
3,370.852
381(045
1.899 .238
1.073,665
12.470.403
210.104
3.317(1134
453(274
0
13.031 .650
2.5S1.S14
1.917.503
1,319.882
2 . 394 , 3*4
2,960,710
742.536
1,027,798
2.223.343
2, 109.979
1,386,560
1,121,026
5. 886.138
6,136.141
1.429.020
575.168
1.299.320
ITS. 047
200,596
488.539
1.742(720
3.904.449
362 (4V4
12.872(181
1,639.048
32,381
S.868«S25
1.145(607
1(943(271
9,552,396
1.615.674
2.933(622
53(240
4.876(323
7.226(602
957(341
660(154
3(362(671
4(165(106
6(360(434
3,071(790
50(115
73(999
300(313
2(092(290
365(089
276(819
1(295(815
217(321
636(163
334(101
3(127(088
350(298
598(438
466(970
2(VS4
3(674(148
2(478(996
640(856
1(000(635
1(182(134
1(368(718
527(318
728(899
1(938(637
750(762
562(603
1(667(609
1(752(693
2(216(418
753(652
712(191
1(083(859
216(478
287(539
162(805
1(103(179
914(110
133(085
3(018(127
2(201(976
51(256
4(006(680
537(492
1(240(549
2(370(184
266(030
2(135(118
141(845
2(149(318
4(394(345
599(550
155(883
2(774(511
952(729
5(363(515
1(395(725
32.135
77(114
60(450
869(972
25(788
12(062
4(666(668
598.367
2(535.401
1(407(767
15(597(492
560(403
3(915(622
919(844
2.954
16(705(799
5(060,511
2(558.359
2.320,417
•3(576.488
4(329.428
1(269(854
1(756(697
4(161(981
2(860(742
1(949(163
2(768(636
7(638.832
8(352(560
2(182(673
1(287.360
2(383(180
391(525
488.135
651.344
2(845.899
4(818(555
495.579
15(890(309
3(841(024
83(638
9(875(206
1(683.100
J.lfl3>820
11(922.580
1.881 .70S
5(668(741
195.086
. 7(025.641
11,620,947
1,556.891
816.037
6(137(182
b. 117.835
11(723(949
4(467.475
82(250
151,113
360(764
2(962(262
390.878
288.881
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
I
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
4
1
0
2
1
0
2
2
.27
.77
.76
(75
.56
.09
.03
(81
.00
.31
.71
.96
.42
.21
.59
.41
.50
.00
.77
.56
.21
.16
.58
.29
.40
.35
.32
.15
.75
.18
.84
.37
.95
.54
.10
.52
.50
.77
.80
.63
.25
.16
.50
.51
.87
.15
.73
.93
.81
.00
.22
.04
.19
.76
.73
.70
0.49
0.44
0.25
0.23 (
0.14 (
0.14 <
0.19
0,83
0.00 1
0.37
0.68
0.66 <
1.07 ,
0.11
0.27 <
0.29 (
U.36 1
0.88
0.27
0.63 i
0.31
0.35
0.21
0.15
O.SO
0.29
0.39
0.21
0.25
1.38
0.20
0.14
0.22
0.72
0.16
0.36
0.23
0.49
0.45 ,
0.27
1.17 .
0.42
0.66 .
0.31
0.55
0.51 ,
0.60
0.21
4.06 J
0.45
0.14
2.13
0.24
0.32
0.19 <
0.12 ,
,75 50
.21 180
.01 54
1.99 59
1.70 66
1.23 38
.21 141
.65 71
).00 0
1.68 72
1.39 56
!,62 67
!.49 71
1.32 96
1.86 114
).ri 59
1.86 88
.88 68
.04 39
M9 129
.52 61
.51 140
.78 179
.45 91
.90 59
.64 59
.71 63
.35 60
.00 54
.55 122
.04 101
.51 43
.17 248
.26 52
.26 36
.88 130
.73 40
.26 100
!.24 76
1.90 138
!.42 57
).58 48
'.16 61
>,82 55
1.42 36
J.66 117
1.33 57
1.14 94
}.B7 98
1.45 135
1.35 97
k.17 102
1.43 103
1.08 113
i.93 97
!.02 86
.78
.63
.74
.56
.96
.40
.03
.77
.00
.23
.62
.05
.09
.21
.11
.88
.22
.15
.41
.65
.09
.85
.64
.29
.34
.61
.13
.16
.50
.IS
.83
.67
.77
.26
.35
.52
.50
.37
.98
.44
.40
.53
.49
.97
,5J
.64
.95
.24
.50
.94
.95
.73
.26
.09
.83
.68
82.
545.
163.
90.
197.
105.
273.
126.
2459.
179.
101,
391.
133.
334.
217.
169.
186.
111.
100.
146.
196.
233.
393.
335.
106.
254.
155.
178.
212.
163.
332.
80.
608.
107.
162.
285.
17J.
223.
113.
214.
89.
121.
105.
130.
34.
123.
81.
245.
136.
322.
81.
286.
189.
260.
136.
259.
10
68
00
51
78
29
51
91
45
41
90
92
47
47
00
82
14
09
80
74
82
05
34
32
91
24
86
93
79
41
16
08
32
11
48
55
65
50
86
32
11
90
49
04
48
27
08
90
16
90
2»
31
41
30
84
81
59.48
313.21
81.90
66.90
93.19
80.21
161.28
99.74
2459.45
95.80
78.80
148.43
97.99
174.96
146.64
105.54
128.85
88.15
55.52
134. sa
142.26
162.00
236.35
175.55
85.66
148.13
114.40
130.12
94.06
136.15
145.53
53.45
317.06
83.70
113.64
193.42
83.02
148.35
84.31
149.17
72.70
101.88
74.95
83.98
34.74
118.72
68.41
122.47
115.73
194.35
91.44
196.41
117.70
156.33
100.41
93.91
U.S. TOTALS
149(687(224 68(318(449 218(005(674
0.76
0.35
1.11
102.29
198.92
132.57
-------
UNITED STATES TOTAL
IN OPERATION
16.574
• •••••DISPOSAL METHOD"""
OUTFALL TO SURFACE WATERS
OCEAN OU1FALL
HOLDING POM)
DEEV HELL
GROUND WATEM RECHAM.OE
OTHER LAND DISPOSAL
RECYCLING AND REUSE
SEPTIC TANK flELO
OTHEM
•••TOTAL***
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
ANALYSIS OF LIOUID EFFLUENT DISPOSAL
NUMBER OF RESPONSES
•CURRENT STATUS*
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
6ST
ENLARGE
7Z5
27
78
3
33
44
10
7
S3
902
UP8RADE
3$$
11
ir
0
s
17
1
1
2
410
•NATURE OF PROJECTED CHAN
ENLAR9E
AND NEK
UPGRADE CONST. REPLACE
653
11
35
0
12
14
3
4
16
750
5.2*5
187
411
38
131
520
73
32
1.957
8.6*7
295
11
25
0
5
8
0
407
28
761
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE 10
REOUIftEDt BUT NOT YET
APPROVED OR FUNDED
8.406
ABANDON
1.816
61
77
2
27
55
11
622
66
2.739
NO
CHAN8E
8.427
106
526
6
125
325
24
97
1>320
10.960
OTHER
251
4
39
0
8
20
S
19
52
401
•••TOTAL*"
17.821
418
1.212
49
346
1.006
127
1.191
3.498
25.673
-------
19T6 NEEDS SURVEY
REQUIRED INFILTRATION/INFLOW CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AND BASIS OF ESTIMATE
NUMBERS OF FACILITIES WITH NEEDS
FEBRUARY lOi 19T7
TABLE 11
BASIS OF ESTIMATE
STATE CERTIFICATION
I/I ANALYSIS COMPLETED
EVALUATION SURVEY COMPLETED
tNGlNEEK/CONSULTANT FIRM ESTIMATE
COST OF PREVIOUS COMPARABLE CONSTRUCTION
LNGINEEK/CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
tPA - SUPPLItU COST ESTIMATING PROCEDURES
COST EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS
KJUtfH ESTIMATE
(NONE GIVEN)
NOT KNOWN
i
80
1
0
0
82
65S,
2
312
3(663
NONE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
SEAL OFF R
SEWER LINES S
0
365
S3
2
0
381
40
1
0
1
CORRECTIVE ACTION
CHANGE/CREATE PROVIDE
REPLACE/RELINE FLOW ROUTING FLOW
SECTIONS SYSTEM EQUALIZATION OTHER
0
S97
109
3
0
264
112
1
0
2
0
10
4
0
0
8
1
0
0
0
0
32
6
0
0
20
0
3
0
1
0
243
53
2
0
159
98
1
0
2
TOTAL
2
1.328
227
7
0
915
906
8
312
3(670
TOTALS
4t7«H
843
1,089
23
559
7.379
-------
DOLLAR NEEDS
BASIS OF ESTIMATE
STATE CERTIFICATION
I/I ANALYSIS COMPLETED
EVALUATION SURVEY COMPLETED
ENGINEER/CONSULTANT FIRM EST.
CUST OF PKEVIOUS KOMP. CONST.
ENS. /CONSULTANT PKELIM. EST.
t PA-SUPPLIED COST EST. PNOC.
COST EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS
KOUSH ESTIMATE
(NONE GIVEN)
FOR REQUIRED
NOT KNOWN
49
20(762
288
0
0
98(289
4*3. 1ST
282
18(841
80.688
19T6 NEEDS
INFILTRATION/INFLOW
(THOUSANDS OF
SEAL OFF
NONE SEHER LINES
0 0
0 209(503
0 39,258
0 709
0 ft
0 »98.0*3
0 12.007
0 1
0 0
3 238
SURVEY
CORRECTIVE AC
DOLLARS)
ORRECTIVE AC
REPLACE/
REUNE
SENEK
SECTIONS
0
771.617
124.838
819
0
20U2S3
54,670
25
0
859
FEBRUARY 10.
TABLE 12
1977
TIONS BY BASIS OF ESTIMATE
CHANGE/
CREATE
FLO* ROUT.
SYSTEM
0
15.769
10(674
0
0
5(686
3(102
0
0
0
PROVIDE
FLOW
EQUILIZA.
0
24.017
2,502
0
0
31(913
0
1(289
0
1(231
OTHER
0
150.657
29.375
303
0
126.297
36.804
279
0
311
TOTAL
49
1(192(325
206.935
1(831
0
961(481
549,780
1.876
18.841
83.530
TOTALS
662.596
759,759
1,154,081
35(231
60(952
344.026 3(016.648
-------
19T6 NEEDS SURVEY
FEBRUARY 10. 19T7
TABLE 13
REWIRED REPLACEMENT AND/OR MAJOR REHABILITATION ACTIONS AND BASIS OF ESTIMATE
NUMBERS OF FACILITIES WITH NEEDS
BASIS OF ESTIMATE
STATE CERTIFICATION
ANALYSIS COMPLETED
EVALUATION SUHVEY COMPLETED
bMUNEEM/CONSULTANT FIRM ESTIMATE
COST OF PREVIOUS COMPARABLE CONSTRUCTION
tNGINEER/CONSULTANT PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE
tPA - SUPPLIED COST ESTIMATING PROCEDURES
COST EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS
HOUUH ESTIMATE
(NONE GIVEN)
TOTALS
DT KNONN
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
2
SEAL OFF K
NONE SCllEH LINES S
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 12
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
CORRECTIVE ACTION
CMAN6E/CREATE
KEPLACE/KELINE FLO* ROUTIN6
SECTIONS SYSTEM
0
32
26
1
0
26*
1
0
0
*
328
PROVIDE
FLOM
EQUALIZATION OTHER
0
11
11
0
0
84
0
0
0
0
10*
TOTAL
46
37
1
0
368
2
0
1
6
461
-------
1»76 NEEDS
DOLLAR
BASIS OF ESTIMATE
STATE CERTIFICATION
ANALYSIS COMPLETED
tVALUATION SUKVtY COMPLETED
tNGlNEER/CONSULFANT FIRM EST.
COST OF PREVIOUS COMP. CONST.
tN6. /CONSULTANT PKELIM. EST.
tPA-SUPPLIEO COST EST. PROC.
COST EFFECTIVE ANALYSIS
ROUGH ESTIMATE
(NONE alVEN)
NEEDS FOR REPLACEMENT
NOT KNOWN NONE
0
69
0
0
0
400
0
0
1*1
3,338
AND/OH MAJOR
(THOUSANDS OF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SEAL OFF
SEHER LINI
0
0
0
0
0
8,658
0
0
0
0
SURVEY
REHABILITATIOf
DOLLARS!
CORRECTIVE Al
REPLACE/
SEHER
ES SECTIONS
0
31.300
95,351
8*0
0
*, 7S1>678
5
0
0
1,11*
FEBRUARY 10 • 1977
TABLE 14
< BY BASIS OF
CHANGE/
CREATE
FLO* ROUT.
SYSTEM
0
60,027
0
0
0
63,385
505
0
0
0
ESTIMATE
PROVIDE
FLOH
EQUILIZA.
0
0
0
0
0
40
0
0
0
0
OTHER
0
25,9*5
7,992
0
0
435,746
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
0
117,3*1
103,343
840
0
5,259,907
510
0
1*1
4,452
TOTALS
3,9*8
6,658
4,880.288
1S3.917
40
449.683 5,486,534
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
STATE AVEKASE FLOW!)
PHLSENT, PKOJECTEO I PERCENT CHANGE
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
CULOKADO
CONNECTICUT
ULLAWARE
01 ST. OF COLUH
FLORIDA
(jtUH(»I»
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
KANSAS
KtNTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINt
MAKYLANO
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NtBKASKA
NLVAUA
Nt« HAMPSHIRE
Nt» JERSEY
Nt» MEXICO
Nt* YORK
NUHTH CAROLINA
NUHTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OME60N
PENNSYLVANIA
KHODt ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TtNNtSSEE
TtXAS
UTAH
VhHMONT
V1HG1NIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
PUtH(0 RICO
PAC. TR. TERH.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
TOTAL
FLOW
1(515(400)
80(21)
628(166)
572(151)
8,486(2241)
1,410(372)
1,489(393)
311(82)
1,101(291)
2,165(577)
2,070(546)
114(30)
271 (71)
8,201(2166)
2,660(708)
1,314(347)
852(225)
865(228)
954(252)
337(89)
1.355(358)
933(246)
5,868(1550)
1.903(502)
1,587(419)
2,182(576)
364(96)
583(154)
320(84)
195(51)
3,788(1000)
313(82)
8,819(23291
1(749(462)
161142)
5(639(1489)
899(237)
1(3581358)
7(088(1872)
352(93)
1,410(372)
184(48)
1(807(477)
4(802(1268)
808(213)
563(148)
1(360(359)
1,608(424)
389(102)
2(225(587)
133(35)
38(10)
394(104)
17(4)
IN THOUSANDS OF CUBIC METEHS PER DAY
> P H E S E N I «•
IND. INC.
FLOW
176(46)
14(3)
28(7)
78(20)
1(274(336)
190(50)
262(69)
139(36)
OO
131(34)
591(156)
8(2)
60(15)
3(370(890)
633(167)
252(66)
124132)
261(69)
34(9)
79(21)
202(53)
297(781
1(230(325)
597(157)
111(29)
404(106)
14(3)
144(38)
OO
46(12)
816(215)
19(5)
1(039(274)
665(175)
15(4)
1(141(301)
66(17)
171(45)
1(069(282)
124(32)
305(80)
31(8)
466(123)
531(140)
98(26)
17(4)
112129)
172(45)
64(17)
605(160)
00
OO
OO
54(14)
01)
01)
»
11.6
17.8
4.6
13.7
15.0
13.5
17.6
44.8
0.0
5.9
28.5
7.4
22.3
41.0
23.6
19.1
14.5
30.2
3.5
23.6
14.9
31.9
20.9
31.3
6.9
18.5
3.8
24.7
0.0
23.9
21.5
6.3
11.7
38.0
9.6
20.2
7.3
12.6
15.0
35.2
21.6
17.2
25.8
11.0
12.1
3.1
8.2
10.7
16.5
27.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
13.7
0.0
0.0
LITERS /
CAP. /DAY
652(172)
352(93)
337(89)
486(128)
3821101)
552(145)
612(161)
364(96)
579(153)
410(108)
465(122)
486(126)
648(171)
464(122)
542(143)
461(121)
416(110)
479(1261
372(98)
571(150)
430(113)
488(128)
671(177)
385(101)
1(267(334)
424(112)
7061186)
399(105)
496(131)
468(123)
461(121)
394(104)
481(127)
416(109)
358(94)
525(138)
417(110)
653(172)
624(164)
552(145)
702(185)
399(105)
572(151)
439(116)
678(179)
2(1261561)
404(106)
624(164)
437(115)
516(136)
4701124)
967(255)
542(143)
339(89)
344(90)
379(100)
TOTAL IND.
FLOW
1(933(510)
312(82)
1,2441328)
1(131(298)
12(823(3387)
2(426(641)
2(264(598)
596(157)
1,169(309)
6(09811610)
3,375(8911
680(174)
482(127)
13(958(3687)
4(62611222)
1(9631518)
1(330(351)
1,872(494)
2,178(575)
548(144)
2(624(693)
2(294(606)
9(144(2415)
2,858(755)
1,298(343)
3,715(981)
470(124)
1(022(270)
943(249)
476(125)
5,527(1460)
622(164)
14,654(3871)
3,044(804)
221(58)
9.176(2424)
1,477(390)
2, 080(549)
8,405(2220)
630(166)
1,934(510)
268(70)
2,786(736)
8,774(2318)
913(241)
255(67)
3,143(830)
3(141(829)
943(249)
3,669(969)
261(68)
25(6)
104(27)
1,309(345)
58(15)
43(11)
FLOW
266(70)
22(5)
7(2)
136(36)
2(160(570)
290(78)
482(127)
147(38)
00
254(67)
788(208)
56(15)
96(25)
5(345(1412)
1(128(298)
4651122)
238(62)
529(139)
128(331
133(35)
295(77)
633(167)
1(807(477)
931(245)
192(50)
800(211)
17(4)
344(91)
16(5)
114(30)
1(309(345)
25(6)
1(721(454)
1(086(286)
26(6)
2(041(539)
100(26)
377(99)
1(471(388)
191(50)
443(117)
40(10)
795(210)
648(171)
120(31)
27(7)
404(106)
316(83)
88(23)
1(096(289)
OO
10(2)
01)
261(69)
01)
OO
INO.
*
13.7
7.2
0.6
12.0
16.8
12.2
21.2
24.6
0.0
4.1
23.3
8.3
20.0
38.2
24.4
23.6
17.8
28.2
5.8
24.3
11.2
27.6
19.7
32.5
14.8
21.5
3.6
33.7
2.0
24.1
23.6
4.1
11.7
35.6
11.9
22.2
6.8
18.1
17.5
30.4
22.9
14.9
28.5
7.3
13.1
10.6
12.8
10.0
9.3
29.8
0.0
43.2
0.0
19.9
0.1
0.0
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE IS
LITERS /
CAP. /DAY
450(119)
547(144)
433(114)
501(132)
401(106)
546(144)
518(137)
431(114)
5251138)
463(122)
474(1251
4921130)
5441143)
572(151)
5461144)
483(127)
440(116)
424(112)
509(134)
513(135)
439(116)
53411411
647(171)
425(112)
512(135)
4311113)
571(151)
449(118)
797(210)
467(123)
388(102)
442(116)
543(143)
398(105)
384(101)
5291139)
477(126)
4651122)
473(125)
523(138)
446(117)
4411116)
509(134)
511(135)
528(139)
5501145)
4631122)
673(177)
472(124)
534(141)
482(127)
386(102)
368(97)
3791100)
370(97)
407(107)
TOTAL IND. LITERS /
FLOW
• 27.5
•286.2
• 97.9
• 97.5
• 51 .1
• 72.0
• 52.0
• 91.3
• 6.1
•179.0
•63.0
•492.6
• 78.0
• 70.1
• 72.6
•49.3
• 56.0
•116.4
•128.1
• 62.3
• 93.6
•145.7
•ss.a
•50.1
-18.1
• 70.2
•28.9
• 75.1
•194.0
•143.8
••45.9
• 98.1
• 66.1
• 74.0
• 37.0
• 62.7
• 64.2
• 53.1
• 18.5
• 78.9
• 37.0
• 45.9
• 54.1
• 82.7
• 12.9
-54.7
•131.0
• 95.2
•142.0
• 64.8
• 95.8
•1356.5
•174.7
•231.9
•3001.9
•140.4
FLOW
•51.0
• 56.5
-72.4
• 73.3
•69.4
• 55.5
• 83.9
•5.3
• 0.0
• 94.3
• 33.4
•566,6
• 59.7
•58.6
• 78.1
• 84.5
• 91.7
•102.3
•273.2
•67.0
• 45.8
•112.7
• 46.8
• 55.9
• 73.2
• 97.7
• 20.7
•138.7
• 0.0
•145.5
• 60.2
• 28.8
• 65.5
• 63.2
• 70.3
• 79.8
• 52.0
•119.8
• 37.5
• 54.4
• 45.1
• 26.7
• 70.4
• 21.8
• 22.0
• 54.6
•260.4
•83.2
• 36.8
• 80.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
• 3 3.2
0.0
0.0
CAP. /DAY
-30.9
• 55.2
•28.5
• 3.0
•5.0
-l.l
-15.2
• 18.4
-9.4
• 12.7
•1.9
• 1.1
-15.9
• 23.4
• 0.6
•4.7
•5.7
-11.4
• 36.8
-10.0
•2.1
• 9.3
-3.5
•10.1
-59.5
• 1.6
-19.0
•12.6
•60.5
-0.3
-15.8
• 12.0
• 13.0
-4.3
•7.2
• 0.7
• 14.2
-28.8
-24.0
-5.1
-36.4
•10.6
-11.0
•16.3
-22.1
-74.1
•14.4
• T.8
•7.9
• 3.6
• 2.5
-60.0
-31.9
•11. T
•T.7
• 7.4
U.S. TOTALS 96(662(25535) 18(354(4848) 18.9 493(130) 159.339(42093) 30(446(8043) 19.1 492(130) »64.8 »65.8 -0.2
NUJESt 1. FLOWS IN CUBIC MtTEHS X 1000 2. APPROXIMATE MOO IN PARtNTHESES 3, SUM OF ENTRIES MAY NOT EQUAL TOTALS DUE TO ROUMD-OFFS
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER AND PERCENT OF TREATMENT PLANTS BY FLOW
CUBIC METERS PER BAY 0-.40
(MILLION GALLONS PER DAY) (0-.10SI
TOTAL • OFt» OF)
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
GEORGIA
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
I OVA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEK HAMPSHIRE
NEK JERSEY
NEW MEXICO
MEN YORK'
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
WEST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
WYOMING
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TR. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
NUMBER OF PLANTS PLANTS (PLANTS)
311
125
163
429
801
187
us
30
1
326
593
55
91
1.119
481
1,098
426
328
355
136
292
126
393
596
214
770
136
322
67
101
254
101
1.013
411
357
848
448
114
1*073
22
386
144
340
999
116
96
644
160
542
609
88
6
7
34
39
4
138(44.52)
108(86.40)
104(63.80)
259(60.40)
381(47.57)
86(45.99)
27(23.48)
14(46.67)
01 0.00)
85(26.08)
328(55.37)
32(58.18)
62(68.13)
636(56.84)
260(54.05)
770(70.13)
217(50.83)
197(60,061
163(45.92)
69(50.74)
221(75.68)
45(39.71)
123(31.30)
320(53.69)
61(28.50)
489(63.51)
67(49.52)
236(73.09)
41(61.19)
60(59.41)
41(16.14)
47146. 54)
612(60.41)
152(36.96)
307(65.99)
367(43.30)
261(56.29)
24(20.57)
557(51.90)
9(40.91)
195(50.52)
91(62.02)
171150.29)
338(33.81)
35(30.17)
47(48.96)
490(76.09)
59(36.68)
443(81.73)
348(57.14)
47(53.811
5(83.33)
4(57.14)
T<20.59)
36(92.31)
2(50.00)
.401-4.0
(.106-1.05)
* OF 11 OF)
PLANTS(PLANTS)
121(38.82)
13(10.40)
47(28.83)
138(32.23)
237(29.59)
71(37.97)
37(32.17)
14(46.67)
01 0.00)
140142.99)
191(32.28)
14(2S.4S)
16(17.58)
363(32.44)
147(30.56)
277(25.23)
173(40.53)
94(28.66)
130(36.62)
43(31.62)
49(16.78)
38(30.16)
170(43.26)
226(37.921
94(43.93)
227(29.48)
46(33.88)
65(20.12)
19(28.36)
25(24.75)
113(44.49)
43(42.58)
256(25.27)
165(40.19)
39(10.92)
320(37.71)
144(32.14)
32(27.56)
322(29.98)
4(18.18)
131(33.94)
44(30.24)
115(33.82)
510IS1.0S)
54(46.55)
37(38.54)
105(16.30)
56(35.00)
80(14.76)
203(33.33)
3S(»0.*<))
1(16.67)
1(14.29)
21(61.76)
31 T.69)
0( 0.001
4.001-40
(1.06-10.5)
• OF (I OF)
PL ANTS (PL ANTS)
42113.44)
31 2.40)
91 5.52)
311 7.13)
154(19.23)
25(13.37)
40(34.78)
11 3.33)
01 0.00)
92(28.17)
62(10.50)
8(14.55)
11112,09)
1041 9.29)
59(12.27)
46( 4.19)
34( 7.V2)
34(10.37)
60(16.90)
24(17.65)
18( 6.16)
38(30.16)
83(21.12)
42( 7.05)
S2<24.30)
46( 5.971
22(15.86)
19( 5.86)
4( 5.97)
16(15.84)
87(34.25)
10( 9.89)
113(11.15)
88(21.39)
IK 3.08)
142(16.75)
391 d.6«)
53(45.96)
169(15.73)
8(36.36)
55(14.25)
a< 3.55)
49(14.41)
130113.04)
22(18.97)
11(11.46)
37 < 5.75)
39(24.38)
18( 3.32)
48( 7.88)
S( S;70)
0( 0.001
2(28.57)
4(11.76)
01 0.00)
2(50.00)
40.001-190
(10.57*50.2)
* OF(X OF)
PLANTS(PLANTS)
10(3.22)
1(0.80)
2(1.23)
1(0.23)
22(2.75)
3(1.60)
11(9.57)
0(0.00)
0(0.00)
812.45)
10(1.69)
0(0.00)
2(2.20)
13(1.16)
13(2.70)
5(0.46)
3(0.70)
2(0.61)
2(0.56)
0(0.00)
3(1.03)
5(3.97)
15(3.82)
7(1.17)
6(2,80)
5(0.65)
1(0.74)
3(0.93)
3(4.48)
0(0.00)
9(3.54)
1(0.99)
1711.68!
611.461
0(0.00)
12(1.421
4(0.89)
6(5.04)
17(1.61)
0(0.00)
4(1.04)
211.39)
2(0.59)
16(1.60)
5(4.31)
0(0.00)
11(1.71)
4(2.50)
1(0.18)
8(1.31)
0(0.00)
0(6.001
0(6.00)
112.94)
0(0.001
oio.oo)
190*
150.2*)
* OF(* OF)
PLANTS(PLANTS)
01
01
1(
01
71
2(
01
11
0.00)
o.oo)
0.61)
0.00)
0.87)
1.07)
0.00)
3.33)
1(100.00)
11
11
11
01
31
21
01
01
11
01
01
1(
01
21
11
11
31
01
01
01
01
41
01
151
01
0(
7(
0(
11
81
1(
1<
01
3(
51
01
11
11
2(
0<
2T
d(
01
01
i(
01
01
0.31)
0.17)
1.82)
0.00)
0.27)
0.42)
0.00)
0.00)
0.30)
0.00)
o.oo)
0.34)
0.00)
0.51)
0.17)
0.47)
0.39)
0.00)
0.00)
0.00)
0.00)
1.57)
0.00)
1.48)
0.00)
0.00)
0.83)
0.00)
0.87)
0.78)
4.55)
0.26)
0.00)
0.88)
0.50)
0.00)
1.04)
0.16)
1.25)
o.oo)
0.33)
6.001
0.00)
0.00)
2.94)
0.00)
0,00)
U.S. TOTALS
19(041
10,293(54.06)
6,058(31.82)
2,326(12.22)
28211.48)
81( 0.43)
-------
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE 17
NEtUS SURVEY
HEMOVAL RATtS AND STHE.AM LOAD I NO
FHOM FACILITIES EXISTING IN 1976
LH MtTHIC TONS PER DAY
ALL FACILITIES
STATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AH I /UNA
AKKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
CULOKADO
CONNECTICUT
UtLAHARE
UIST. OF CULUM.
FLUH1DA
btJKUIA
HA*A1 I
1UAMO
ILLINOIS
1N01ANA
1U«A
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LUUlalANA
MAINE
MAMYLANu
MASSACHUSETTS
MlCnletN
MINNESOTA
HlbSlSSICCI
M1SSUUHI
MUNI ANA
NtdKASKA
NtVAOA
Mt« MAMflrtlHt
Ntw JERSLT
Nt« MEXICO
Nt* YOU*
NOHIn CAHOLINA
HOrtlM DAKOTA
OnlO
OKLAHOMA
OMtbUN
KtNNSYLVANIA
KMOUt ISLAND
SOUTH CANUL1NA
SOOTH DAKOTA
ItNNtSSEt
ItAAa
OIAH
VtKMUNT
VIHOINIA
«|A»H1NGTUN
WfcST VIHG1N1A
•laCUNSIN
HYOMINR
AMtHlCAN SAMOA
UUAM
PUtKIO HlCO
KAC. TB. tEKN.
VlHlilN ISLANDS
FLUl
1.J32IJS1)
7b(20)
620 1166)
372(151)
0.466(2230)
1.409IJ72)
1.421(379)
311 (02)
1(101(290)
2>U37(bJB)
2t 024 (334 )
114(30)
26«< '01
8.059 (2129)
21679(707)
1<31J(J40)
Bbl (223)
/BU (2U6)
953 (2bl )
312 (B2)
1(395(390)
933(246)
9 1 f 42 ( lb 16)
1>B4«(499>
1 1 97V (41 7 1
2llB2(37B)
364 (9b)
bdJ ( 15*)
317(83)
In3 (4B)
Ji raB(lOOO)
313(02)
0( TW (2324 )
1 1627 (42V)
161(42)
b iojo ( 14B7 )
099(237)
l(J5BI3b0)
7>U19I1B34)
3b£ (V3)
l(J7B(Jb4)
lB3(4B)
!>4b4(3B4)
4.729(1249)
« Ub{213)
bh3(140)
1 t Jb7 (3bd)
1 tOOB (424 )
JDVU02)
2.21b(98b)
133(3b)
UO
38 (10)
3V4(104)
1(1
17(4)
INF.
ll
152
2.239
323
219
93
19B
405
434
20
7S
1.3JU
449
47B
1VB
170
176
71
2BV
1V2
1.076
• SB
266
499
62
264
67
4b
V46
70
1(262
40b
42
961
1B4
2b3
1(266
48
460
4V
349
990
112
109
258
307
02
917
25
0
8
02
0
2
EKF.
40
5
2b
872
90
63
B
41
73
7V
9
12
130
bl
124
bb
41
bl
21
Bb
60
213
106
70
222
27
VI
b
17
922
17
bib
9V
3
261
34
64
274
20
81
7
06
134
17
15
69
156
32
97
B
'»
9
48
0
1
lb HEM
89.0
91.8
84.2
03.5
61.1
71.9
70,3
H4.2
78.9
B1.8
Bl.b
91.7
B4.1
89. 4
00.1
13.1
71.9
77.0
70.9
70.1
70. S
60.6
Bft.l
76.7
73. 3
59.1
59.5
65.3
91. 3
60.5
44.0
74.8
59.2
05.3
91. 0
'2.0
81.0
74.7
78.3
57.0
02.4
04.3
75.2
86.4
04.3
85.9
74.5
40.9
60.8
81.1
66.9
20.0
4.3
41.4
58.8
36.2
. INF.
260
14
149
167
2>S16
291
216
50
198
304
404
23
6b
1<593
5J4
426
214
IU9
180
70
240
102
1(440
561
335
552
40
223
69
45
811
63
1(231
334
30
1(131
222
255
1.485
46
275
45
437
1(048
154
107
245
310
86
548
24
0
B
04
0
3
SOLIDS
tFF.
45
S
2i)
Jl
764
70
90
16
41
01
V9
9
10
196
70
99
40
40
94
20
70
48
297
12*0
1J3
Ib9
19
76
6
13
298
13
474
63
5
226
39
49
330
20
01
7
86
193
20
11
32
104
30
112
9
0
0
33
0
1
« HtM.
82.5
64.7
06.5
81.1
69.6
73.2
73.2
'2.6
70.9
70.9
73.4
97.7
04.3
90.1
06.0
77.7
77.4
78.9
70.0
71.6
71.7
73.6
79.4
70.6
60.2
69.4
99.2
6b.6
90.4
70.0
63.2
78.7
61.5
00.9
09.6
80.0
02.2
00.6
77.8
55.5
70.5
04.4
00.1
01.5
86.7
09.3
70.4
67.2
64.0
fy.4
63.2
30.0
5.0
61). a
65.6
69.2
INFLUENT
44
8
3
1
3
b
4
6
46
3
b
36
b
1
1
10
EFFLUENT
10
3
3
1
2
4
4
5
26
2
S
24
3
1
3
INFLUENT
1
38
16
15
3
1
1
104
19
9
10
9
13
4
7
5
3
32
11
3
6
1
1
3
IITROSEN *
EFFLUENT
38
10
15
1
1
56
11
6
9
6
9
3
6
3
2
27
5
2
4
1
1
3
..... OTHER •«•»•
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
29 5
3 2
33 4
1 1
21 13
13 3
17 5
449 39
T 5
U.S. TOTALS vb<040(25109) 1«>383 5.248 72.92 Ol66V 4.9*3 76.0 104 96 315 219 573
1. FLO.b IN CUbIC HEttMS X 1000 2. APPROXIMATE ISO IN PARENTHESES 3. METRIC TONS X .9072 • SHORT TONS
77
-------
1976 NEtUS SUSVEY
HtMOVAL NUTtS ANJ STHEAM LOADING
FrtOM FACILITIES EXISTING IN 1V76
FACILITItS PROVIDING LtSS THAN SECONOAKY TKtATMENT
IN MtTHIC TONS PE« DAr
FEtWUARY 10i 1477
TABLE 17A
STATE
ALABAMA
ALllSM
AHUONA
MHllANSAS
CALIFORNIA
UULOKADO
CUnNLCTlCur
DELAWARE
Dial. OF CULUH.
I-LOH10A
UbJKblA
HA«A 1 1
luonu
ILLlHOIS
INDIANA
lUuA
KAIM3AS
ItbNlOCKY
LUU1MANA
WBlNt
MARYLAND
MAbbACHOitlTi
MICHIGAN
MINNtSOTA
•MbslSSIPPI
nlbaUURI
i*Uf* I'ANA
NtoSASKA
rltUnUA
*tf nAMH^rtlHE
•it* JEHacY
«t-i "EXlCU
•«h « YOHK
rtUHIH CAHULINA
•MOnln UttKUU
Onto
OfvLMrtGMA
OHtLUU'V
f>t«'.sYLV«MiA
rtHUUt I^LAplLt
SUJlrl C4KOL1NM
suu [n [ihftu 1 u
Itn'.tbbtt
ltA6S
Vt*'2(10)
20b (134)
29b ( 7b)
b.IOd (1 J49)
!OUlt2b4l
79 (^0 )
120IJ3)
/OJtleb)
bbl<14bl
de / (234 )
40d ( 10 7)
332IB7I
bll(Ub)
00 (22 )
l«U9dl290)
»b4 (!!•*]
4(219(1114)
bjl (14(1)
1 tlrl 1 (2b7)
1 * /42(4bO)
2B4 (b7)
JdM(102)
^O(f)
14U ( J7)
3f 2ub (d47)
14?(JB)
b.b2^(l4dbl
bd4( Ib4)
IH ( / )
2t Jb4(b2l>
4U2UUO)
47 J( l£b)
^99(79)
n9 1 23)
olb ( lti£)
| , 1 y f I 474)
/2( 19)
lib( JO)
b^lV 1 14 /)
1 t J23 ( JbU)
eir>( tm
*04 t£ Jd)
1 14 ( JU)
II 1 )
Jbl9>
J/4199)
111
1 M4)
*«•*
INF.
bo
4
bl)
72
1 1 Jd/
224
90
44
19M
11J
210
14
Jl
12 7
Bb
J2J
fb
7j
9b
2 J
232
d7
dbd
99
19d
Jd7
4a
2U7
b
27
HJ7
37
b32
Ib4
b
407
In
79
»bd
32B
20
12b
4lb
U
2J
103
2b4
63
fUU
21
0
a
7b
0
2
HUU3
tFF.
u
b
U
Id
113
H
4d
d
41
32
S2
y
d
bl
2b
11^
4J
29
41
10
Bl
49
Ib4
62
til
211)
ifb
03
t
ID
ill)
U
4b3
42
1
2Ub
22
4j
197
67
b
ba
62* J
2U.O
U.n
.la.l
•.n.J
Jo.i
. INF.
61
12
4«
b2
1.601
20U
9d
bu
19d
1 2o
199
Ib
20
1*4
12J
2H6
101
7o
109
2 J
199
7o
1.17*
loo
22o
4b9
Jo
Ibb
^
311
712
Jl
77UL10S
tKF.
21
4
10
22
OBb
bb
3 a
13
41
bb
70
a
7
ob
Jl
ai
J4
2/
44
14
Bb
Jo
2b2
76
UJ
Ibb
Id
10
1
11
2d7
J99
Jb
^
Ibb
2b
2d
23ii
b9
3
39
1J4
10
Jb
90
2d
7d
4
a
a
.12
u
1
i **** «» PHOSPHORUS ••• • NH3 NITROSEN • »*••• OTHER •**•«
» KfcM. INFLUENT EFFLUENT INFLUENT EFFLUENT INFLUENT EFFLUENT
63. b NOTE ! PHObHHOHUS AND NH3 NITHOIiEN NOT REMOVED BY THIS
63. b TYPL TKtATMtNT PROCESS
7a.3
64.7
37.2
00.9
bd.4
b9.d
7d.9
bb.l
B4.7
44.3
74.0
60.3
74.7
71. b
63. /
bJ.b
50.9
39.4
bo* 7
32.9
7 ' . 7
bd.b
bl).l
60.1
31) .4
b7.3
74. b
00. D
b9.7
72.1
4d.7
70.4
b J.l>
b2.9
70. J
04.0
04.3
4 / .b
62.2
73. U
bo.J
lu,o
74.7
90,3
63. J
bl.d
39. U
03.1
JO.O
1.1
39.2
nb.u
03. <:
U.S. T014L> 4f.d94(l2hS2) 1H.177 4tJO» b^.2 lu.Mb J.927 ej.4
nults! 1. H.0«s l«l CUBIC Mcltrtb X 10JU 2. »fr'HOAl»»le. MOJ In ('OMEmTrttSti J. «tT«lC TOUS X .9072 « SHOHT TONS
-------
1*76 NEEUi SURVEY
KtMUVAL H«Teb AND STHEAM LOADING
FHOM FACIHTUS EAISTIN6 IN 197b
FACILITIES fHOVllUNIj SECONDAKY TKLATKtNT
IN MtTxlC IONS PEN DAY
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE m
HATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AH110NA
AKKANSA5
CALIFORNIA
CULUKADO
CUiiNfcCTICtJT
UtLAhAftE
UIST. OF COLUM.
FLUH10A
(itUHUIA
MA*A1I
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
JO»A
KANSAS
KtNTUCK*
LOUISIANA
MAINt
MAKTLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MlNMtSOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MUNI ANA
NtDKASKA
NtVUUA
Nt« HAMPSHIRE
"It* JtHitT
Kit* MEXICO
Nt.« TOWN I
nlUNTH CAHULINA
NUHIH DAKOTA
unlu ;
UKLorlOMA
UHtbON
PENNSYLVANIA i
HMUUt ISLAND
SUUlH CAHULINA
SUUTH DAKOTA
fttiNtsstt
rtAAs
UTAH
WtHMUNT
ViKblNI A
•ASH1N6TON
• til VIrtlilNIA
«USCONSIN
WYOMING
AMtHlCAN SAMOA
bUHM
HUtKlO KICU
KAC. tH. ItHH.
1 1Kb IN ISLANDS
I-LDX
Bb2(172j
1213)
177(46)
114(30)
1<321 I34d)
2a3( 75)
b2b ( Ibb)
441)
0(1
251 (66)
B92 (22b)
20 (b)
b3 ( 14 1
744(199)
Bb2 (22b)
247(bb)
39 1 ( 92)
377 (99)
294 ( 7d)
lb'1 (40)
79 (20 )
314 (B3)
9b9(2b3)
1 «U13 ( 267)
bu3 1 1 32 )
370 ( 97 )
92 (24)
bBlla)
11 14)
29 (b)
27b( 721
l
494(130)
3KB)
I »29 J (342)
2bl (69)
O29 ( 166)
l>bl7(42M
blllj)
23b (b2)
29 (b)
•99(131)
9Ud 1240 )
479 U2b)
2a (7)
20fl(b4)
122(32)
32 <8)
97 <2b)
b i 1 )
(JO
00
1BI4)
00
Ull
IMF.
126
1
3b
j^
2Sb
74
73
U
U
b9
17S
3
14
lib
109
bb
dl
90
33
2tt
13
6(1
127
243
47
BO
9
lb
3
b
4B
29
276
121
11
224
bb
120
296
11
ou
b
Ib3
IBb
b9
3
bb
19
b
17
1
0
0
b
0
.4
82. 7
90.6
d7.2
d6.1
Bb.b
db.u
B4.3
d7»2
aa.3
db.4
63.6
at.e
03.0
d3»b
a9.4
M4.4
Bb.4
Ab.b
db.7
0.0
0.0
Ob. a
tta.o
0.0
INF.
13b
j
43
25
279
67
75
0
0
46
163
3
12
127
121
sa
88
99
49
24
13
59
Ibb
297
83
71
a
12
3
S
37
28
292
92
9
311
68
lOb
334
9
40
b
191
190
62
3
4b
21
6
15
1
0
0
4
0
0
SJLlUS
tFF.
21
0
b
4
4l
9
16
II
0
7
2b
0
1
19
17
a
11
11
7
4
2
a
27
Jt)
17
11
1
2
0
0
b
4
bO
20
1
3d
d
16
4d
1
b
0
22
2d
11
0
b
2
I)
2
0
0
0
0
0
u
*»»* *• PHOSPHOHUS ••»
* KEM. INFLUENT EFFLUENT
B4.S
73.6
d7.a
d2.7
db.o
db.3
78 .d
dll.O
0.0
d3.b
H4.4
db.4
BB.b
db.O
db.4 i 1
ab.i
86.8
dd.d 4 3
d4.7
d3.6
U4.4
db.2
d2.3 10 b
d/.l
rd.3
d4.2
d2.7
8J.4
db.O
db.61
83.0
84.4
79.3
/d.2
d2.1
87.6 9 2
ad. 3
dJ.9
a=.5 2 l
84.9
a2.7
d3.2
dd.l
d3>0
dl.7
au.s
d3.4
ag.a
do»7
aj.d
d'.O
<1.0
II. 0
ao.l
an. a
0.0
* NH3 N1TROBEN * •••«• OTHER ••••«
INFLUENT EFFLUENT INFLUENT EFFLUENT
4 4
2 1
1
12 3
6 3
2 2
6 6
32 19 3
11 0
2
1
2 2
21 72
1
2 1
U.S. TOTALS 20ibal(9436) 3.7b4 bid eo.d 3.99(1
NUttS! I. FLUKS In CUBIC Htltrti K. 1UUO 2. AfHKUHMA
391 d9.2 27 12 S3 31 30
c. MtiU IN fA«tNT«£!>£S 3. MtTHIC TONS X .9072 • SHORT TONS
-------
1976 NEEDS s
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TAdLE 1TC
KEMOVAL NATES AND STNEAM LOAOINtt
frtOM FACILITIES EXISTING IN 1976
FACILITIES PKOVIDlNti 6KEATEH THAN SECONOAHr TNEATMtNT
IN MtFrtlC IONS PEM DA*
sTATE
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AH HUN A
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLUNADO
CONNECTICUT
OtLAHARE
01ST. OF CUUUM.
FLUH10A
HAnAlI
1UAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
1U4A
KANSAS
KtNTUCKf
LOUISIANA
MAINt
MAXTLANO
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NtdKASKA
NtvAOA
Nt« HAMPSHIRE
Nto JERSEY
Nt« MEXICO
Nt« TORK
NUHIH CAHOLlNA
NUHTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OKEbON
PENNSYLVANIA
KHOOt ISLAND
SOUTH CAHOLlNA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TtNNESSEb
TEAAS
UTAH
VtHMONT
VIRGINIA
•ASH1N8TON
Jtbl VlKtilNIA
•1SCUNSIN
•TONINS
AMtKlCAN SAMOA
UUAM
PUEKIO HICO
HAC. TR. TtHrt.
VlHblN ISLANOS
HLO»
J1H82I
01)
2*O <6*)
Ib2 (42)
a» yj* (33 7)
78 (20>
230(60)
23 (6)
Oil
liU7a<£64>
171 (*b)
lb(*l
80 (23)
hibU2(17*4>
1 1 27b (336)
178 (*7)
91 (2*)
70(18)
1*3 (37)
7* ( 1 V)
1771*6)
16*1*3)
b62 ( 1*8)
3*8(92)
6*117)
OVI18)
171*)
12$ ( J3)
2731 f2)
17(*>
303(80)
171*)
890 1239)
3*8(1**)
101126)
1 t978 (922)
235(62)
£39 (67 )
£t21*(3tt!>>
11)
l4b(3B)
68(lb)
339(89)
2i 023 (33*1
2b6(67)
419(110)
bS9(15b)
160(421
61(16)
13(Jl
U ( )
20
10
00
III)
• »»4
INF.
73
0
*2
48
bVb
2*
*2
a
0
233
*2
3
30
1(067
2&3
98
20
1*
2O
19
*3
**
90
lib
20
27
3
*0
bv
12
60
3
Ib2
129
2*
329
bl
b2
*01
0
bl
22
69
3b7
*1
82
97
32
12
2
0
0
0
0
0
tjoub
EFF.
3
II
3
3
33
1
3
0
0
1*
J
1)
1
62
18
*
1
U
1
1
2
2
7
3
1
1
0
3
*
I)
*
0
11
3
0
23
*
3
30
0
*
1
*
2*
*
0
8
1
0
20
II
0
0
0
0
V
**••
* HEM.
9S.7
V3.3
92.0
92.4
9*.0
99.2
92.7
»0.8
0,0
v*.o
92.3
93.7
94.2
9*.l
92.7
93.8
93.1
94.2
9b.l
92.9
99.2
93.4
91.6
94.9
90.8
92.9
99.7
90.6
93.2
9b.l
92.2
91.1
92.4
VS. 4
96.8
92.8
9U.6
92.6
92,4
93.9
91.9
92.6
92.9
93.7
89.0
9V. 1
91.6
94.1
94.4
93.2
9*,1
U.O
92.7
90. 0
0.0
U.O
»***
INF.
61
0
57
79
636
23
48
7
0
211
41
3
24
1.301
28V
81
23
13
28
22
3s
49
114
103
26
22
3
44
61
9
61
3
161)
122
23
39V
64
70
445
U
bO
18
70
397
80
82
100
38
10
309
3
0
0
0
0
0
SOL I OS
tFF.
3
0
*
5
36
1
3
0
0
16
3
U
1
72
21
*
1
1
2
1
^
3
7
s
2
2
0
3
*
0
*
0
1*
8
1
31
5
*
31
0
*
0
• 4
31
6
0
9
2
1
32
0
0
0
0
U
0
***• »• PHOSPHOKUS ••*
* HEM. INFLUENT EFI-LUENT
93.0
91.7
92.3
93. b
94.3 1 1
92.2
92.*
91.6
U.O
92.2 i 2
91.1
8V. 9
93.0
9*.* 2 1
92.9
93.9
.92.8
91.8
91.7
92.6
94.4
93.0
93.2 3 3
94.8 1
90. b
90.4
99.7
91.8
92.0
91. 7
92.0
9U.1
90.8
93.3
93.0
92.2 10 6
92.2
93.9
93.0 2 1
93.9
91.3
94.9
92.9
92.2
9Z.4
99.6
90.2
93.*
69.3
89.6 b 1
91.1
o.u
96.3
88.6
0.0
O.U
• NH3 NITS06EN *
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
13 11
1
91 S3
13 8
3 1
1
1 1
2 1
1 1
2 1
10 9
* 1
2 2
1 1
1
2 2
••*•« OTHER •*«•»
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
16 1
3
9 1
1
449 39
4 4
U.S. TOTALS) 26.322(rftU6> b.392
HUFtbt 1. FLOMb IN CUblC MtUKS
32* 9*.0 5.913 389 93.* 26 IS 1*8 92 *«2
100U 2. APPROXIMATE MUD IN PAHENTMESE.S 3. METNIC TONS X .9072 • SHOUT TONS
45
-------
if/a NttJS iUKVtY
KATtS AHL> STKEAM LUAUINu
FACILITIES HMOJtCTtO H>« 1991)
IN MtTrflC IONS HSU UAV
ALL FACILITIES
FidHUARf 10. 1977
TABLE 18
tKK.
IHf,
bULlUb
eff.
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AKIIUNA
CULUHAUU
UtLA«A»t
Ulbl. OF CULUH.
hLUKlUA
totUnblA
HAWAII
luano
ILLINOIS
«l JCK»
MA 1 Nt
MARYLAND
bt f Ib
i*Ui 1H. Itnrt.
VlHblN 15LANUS
U.S. TOTALS ISVxfJVItiillO
1. KLOnb IN CUBIC
i.'L'&L
1.1 Jl (29b)
396 1137)
1 . Ih9 ( 30M)
oiu9n(lblo>
J.3 It ( O91 )
n»ji) ( 1 7*)
•.02(12/1
1 3»*b* ( 3d?l7)
4,39J(121J>
l!j2l!i»9>
lto72U94>
2.1/«lb'b>
•540(1*4)
2tn£4 I&9J)
2.294(bl)b>
i;!oSO(733*'
1 .c;9e (343)
31 7 13 I 901 I
470(1 24)
1 . U£2 (2 'U >
94JI249)
"»7tj ( 12b)
b»b27 ( l«bl))
r.22(104)
14»(J34 (30 71 )
3.1144(004)
221 Ibfl)
*« Itm 12422}
1 *47/ (390)
2 . (JOO (b49)
0.4U3I2220)
a3U(lbb)
Io34(bl0)
iif>O \ 70 )
2 . 7oe <7Jb)
0. 774 <£jl D
91 J (24 1 )
bb(b7)
Jl 43(030)
431°49)
3* 4bl9e3)
2bllbd)
23(0)
104(e'l
1 1 3D* (3<»b I
30(13)
43(11)
270
207
OJ
037
1 74
123
2* 321
907
J31
443
bu9
13?
031
bo*
2 7H
037
OS
399
143
134
1.031
149
2.072
d39
0?
1 *93^<
3b?
bi)*>
1.777
13(1
bd3
o3
1.9bl
179
33
71*
21*
B43
34
B
21
3b3
1*
9
2d
20
lo*
/
9
i il>
O3
IV
U
1 /3
4J
Jd
*f«t
bv
I/
Ju
00
2*
luo
13
j£
It
12
133
la
29J
40
3
111
41
40
17B
13
4b
a
3d
103
o
b
39
22
82
7
u
2
3d
1
1
9J.U
O4.4
94. d
97.9
••0.9
92.3
OV.J
89.0
42. 4
9b.d
an. 3
09.9
d8.3
87.0
9b.l
d9.0
9b.S
91.4
87.0
d3* t
91. d
d9.9
90. 7
91. U
87. /
09.0
94.2
91.4
94.2
91. b
92.1
90.1
90.0
92.0
93.3
92.4
94.7
9b.l
07.3
91.7
*9.d
90.2
db.b
90. /
07.B
d>.4
88. a
B7.U
292
230
439
137
2dO
1.4lb
73)
loo
117
3.214
1.140
307
482
bl4
133
b'3
bid
aria
297
dab
do
394
140
137
I.t>b2
123
2.91)9
724
39
2i22b
394
4/b
1.949
14A
470
70
703
2.00b
1 9S
bl
710
214
909
bb
3
14
J3«
14
12
34
24
db
11
d
109
92
It.
14
204
41
30
*d
00
10
3d
39
34
100
13
32
11
12
134
Id
Jib
80
b
123
42
40
20b
Ib
3D
b
bb
119
B
b
bl
22
ao
7
0
2
38
1
1
MB.l
91). b
db.O
91.9
97.1
92.3
07. V
89.0
87. 9
93. b
9A.3
89.4
90. U
d8.2
87.4
93.2
88.3
94.0
dd.J
87.7
04.2
91.7
91.0
90.9
91.9
03.1
09.1
dd.l
d9.2
94.4
d9.1
91. b
09.4
89. b
09. J
92.1
91. /
94. U
9b.b
db.d
91. J
d9.3
91.1
Ob.O
ao.b
aa.il
ao.7
dd.l
89.3
«« CMUbPrlUKUS •••
INFLUENT tPFLUtNT
I
1J
11
lo
b
Bt
1
« NM3 NlTKUljtN *
INFLUKNT EFFLUENT
•»••«
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
i
1
la
»
Jt
1
1*3
*J
21
b
22
27
1
20
1
39
6
131
17
2V
2
1
10
2
n
17
165
25
7
24
4S
1
2
44
JO.72* 3.134 91.b 39.020 3.402 91.3 383 44 837 173 1.177
ftHb X 11)00 2. AlVMOXIMATt HiiJ IN f'AHe.MTHtSE.b 3. HLTKIC TUNi K .9072 * SHOKT TONS
114
-------
l»76 ntcus
Kt"10VAL rtATtb A'VU STHtAM LOAlUnb
mjM KAClLlTlLb I'riOJC.l.TLLI FUK IV9U
NiWlUllSU StXUNIiXMV iHtATM
i-t dtr*«iC IO*S PtH UAY
i»Al>
ALHttftfriA
««««
* «£•••..
lilt- . . crh .
AL«».i*A
AKl iONA
CALlCUKulA
CULUNAIJU
CU'WLCTICUI
UbLA«ANb
Ulaf. Of CULUM.
H_OnlOA
MA«*lj*
10MHU
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
10NA
KAUiAS
nt'4i*UM
UUAH
HUbxIU HICo
Hit.. 1H. ICHH.
VlMulN laL^Nl>b
.^..ol 7o)
3,7(1^/)
.1 .OIJ4 1 1UUD J
Pnvlin^l
1|V,M (3u2l
11(1
nil
1<3/4(»13|
'''tlllltf
37b
3bb ( I4b)
4bb ( 120)
3.4JO (90b)
44B (110)
IbU I 42)
4U4 ( 1 Ubl
2J« (»<:)
^9 / (2tiJ)
3721 Ibl)
«.3?7(17J2)
IK-'lifb)
orJdnil)
£"4 ( /bl
b?u ( 143)
.ifOe(»uO
3^n ( 1 1>2>
dua(213>
91 (2o)
44b ( 1 1 '3)
242(64) '
01)
212(3b)
l.^Ult/Jt
nnvllsul
If21ll(319)
249(bb)
^s ( b)
49(121
0911 1112)
12 ( 13!
«J(11I
-1
1 4U
.197
1 = 1
ion
U
U
310
00
70
b3
97
1 24
2U1
160
2b7
79
3
321)
liObO
123
92
73*
80
3b
19
3*
233
129
ill JO
2B
I2b
ex-
1 20
n«J
1C
1«3
f.i
v I
44
0
42
J»4
114
2/0
31
0
1
1 70
1 j
•9
h
1 /
11
<;
o
*
1
1
1
17
2b
22
39
12
(1
4b
Ib4
13
11
102
13
4
b
7
29
17
163
It
7
13
9<<
11
24
2
12
b
0
"
bj
Ib
33
7
U
1
20
1
1
i^ .*.
.11. J
37. J
•>0..1
J4 ,1-
)b. 0
0.11
H3./
1/.4
B6.7
07. <1
0b.9
Bb.Y
07.1
00. U
03.1
• 04.4
Bb.b
03.6
03.4
00.0
07. b
86.0
83.3
06.4
73.0
Bb.tt
B7.3
00.7
43.6
n».9
00. U
db.l
B/.3
B3.b
37.4
•31.0
*9. 2
ilh. 7
Bb.-!
0.0
03. 1
ab.)
nb.4
47.0
ab.J
90.7
db.lj
«7.9
•JB.J
H7.0
^14
IJB
«J4
Lfi
1 ' 1
o
;>
31<>
o«
43
MB
100
1JU
223
lob
203
79
4
333
• 7*3
127
109
807
82
3*
21
54
242
112
t2*2
133
03
1 22
73b
03
172
21)
99
43
0
42
307
lib
271)
!>1
3
11
Ib7
13
12
*
1 7
1 11
f t
1 )
it
U
t t
T
11
11
13
It
2b
22
39
11
U
4V
111)
16
14
102
13
4
g
7
2V
17
172
21
1
1
•*
11
24
2
U
s
0
b
33
17
33
7
0
1
20
1
1
*•« . /
«f.J
•VI • J
•vi. i
' )• ?
>i. v'
i • ;*
Tl / • J
JO. t
fln,-*
on* Q
4 /• J
T *1
n .4
0 .J
0 .9
•i .1
B .t)
4 .2
09.7
06. t
06.7
07.3
03.7
86.1
07.K
87.0
07.0
84.7
86.1
84 t8
03.3
06.2
46.3
47.3
06.4
06.0
06.0
03. b
00.3
47.0
0.0
03.0
06.3
03.3
46.9
Bb.b
40. b
dO. 7
07.7
07.3
09.3
1
4*
1
U.S. ?01»L!> 52./4U11J929) 1U.62U 1«4*1
IJUftSt 1. CLO«S IN CUHlt MtttrO < JUUU
TAHLt 18*
10. LV77
tfFLvltNT
***** ulnER »•»••
INFLUtNT EFFLU£«T
19
80.4 11.6*1 1.490 47.2 B7 V 63 16 768
2. -\fWOAlMA It Mfii) IN CAHEMTHtStb J. MtTHIC TONS A .9072 • SHORT TUNS
-------
FEJHUAHY lOi 1V77
TArfte tan
STATE
INF.
tv Its NttOs SUKVEY
KtHOYAL HAItS' ANU bTKEAM LOAUlMj
hNOM FACILITIES HHOJtCTtU KOK HVO
FACILITIES PHOVIOINU GKEATtM THAN StCuNUANY THEATMtNT
I* MtTKlC TUNS KEK UAY
•• PHUSPHUHUS •*•
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
ALAUAMA
ALASKA
AHUUNA
OMKANSAS
CALUOHNIA
CULUKAOU
CUiJNtCTlCuT
utLA«4RE
uiar. OF CULUH.
1-LUrtlDA
litUKbIA
nA«AH
1UAHU
ILLINOIS
1NU1ANA
1U«A
KANSAS
KkMIUCKV
LOUISIANA
MAlflL
MAHTLANO
MASbACHUStTTb
MicnieAN
HlNNtSOfA
MlhblSSIHHi
MISSOURI
MONTANA
Nta«ASKA
NbVAUA
Kt» HAMPSHIHIL
NtH JERSLY
Nt« MEXICU
NtK TOKK.
NUHTH CAHULINA
rlUllh DAKOTA
unio
OKLAHOMA
UHtOUN
HbllNSTLVANlA
KMUUt ISLAND
SUUTH CAHULINA
SOOTtl DAKOTA
rt^Mtsstc.
1t*Ai
UIAh
VtKMUNT
VIKUlNIA
BAbMlNSTUN
"tsT VIrtblNIA
DISCONSIN
•TUNING
AHthiCAN SAMOA
JUAM
POtKIO HICO
HAC. TH. ItHM.
viHulN ISLANDS
abt)(22b)
1314)
b4bll7u)
6bVll74)
4>VV!><237b>
. .33613331
237(b7)
SVSdb?)
l>lbV(3oal
4.430 11170)
2.03/1543)
3d3(101)
lufUb)
13.334(3327)
4tUVV(ll)tt2)
1.341 1333)
433111V)
1.0»M2<>7>
H40I222)
IJOUo)
2tb24lt>bb)
fcJO(lOB)
2tve4(7at)>
2.£VV(b07)
a!2(214)
204(73)
21 13)
•1461223)
33«(l42)
237(b2)
4.b24(llV3)
30(13)
a.OV6(213H>
2.3l4lbll)
112UV)
t).4b3(223b)
l.|V
1.32VI404)
4.V6V(131Z>
241(b3)
1>123(2V6)
lbVl44)
2.33/(bl7)
a. 331 12233)
913(241)
42(11)
1.73O(4b4)
1.33l(33b)
373(V8J
2.31Mbl2)
11(3)
Vl<
33(1*1
OiVllttj)
Oil)
1)0
2 !H
2
123
16V
2, V5i!
340
57
13V
2BO
It 043
3«4
111
44
2il<)U
BHf
0?6
1?V
277
241
46
<>OV
1PB
607
7hb
1*3
102
4
360
123
DO
1.333
2U
1.341
6*V
33
l.tior
2»V
3H3
1.093
t>4
391)
•if
bhb
li«lb
17V
U
4|>V
4?3
101
347
3
0
11
142
1
0
BOU3
tFr.
13
0
11
3
1V3
2*
3
7
3
64
26
10
3
12V
2a
23
12
21
IV
3>
26
V
31
26
12
3
0
24
V
3
103
1
Uo
£ V
2
V3
it
£4
lo
3
22
2
43
17
a
0
la
IV
3
3V
0
y
I
17
0
0
» HtM.
V3.f
V3.2
VU. V
V6.3
V3.3
VI. f
V3.a
V4.V
V7.V
V3.0
V3.3
V0.3
V2. V
V4» 1
V6. 1
Vb.v
VO. 1
V2.1
VLB
V2.V
V3» 1
Vb.o
V6.0
V3.3
V4.2
VO.V
V3.2
V2.fa
V3.2
V2.3
V4.3
Vl.3
V2.6
V4.B
V2. 1
V3.b
v2*a
V3.V
V4.4
Vb.O
V3.2
V4.V
V3.1
V6.0
V3.4
V3.U
V4.B
V2.7
0.0
VQ./
V3.0
0.0
INK.
206
2
153
14V
2. VV2
332
32
137
280
1.074
462
al
33
3.070
1.033
4b3
142
.311
231
»B
34d
164
701
1MB
77
4
337
118
H2
1.41H
11
l.bef
37
2* Odd
330
334
1 .214
03
2VQ
3b
ba4
1 » VbO
1V3
V
40V
437
V7
020
3
0
13
171
1
U
tFF.
16
0
Ib
10
1V3
2d
3
11
a
bb
32
t
3
13d
24
33
12
23
20
3
24
10
2V
20
3
0
24
V
3
103
1
143
3
100
34
24
106
3
£3
3
31
113
d
0
17
30
3
3V
g
0
1
U
U
u
* fttM
VI. V
V3.1
av.D
V3.2
V3.3
Vl.3
V3 . 7
VI. V
V 7. 1
V3.M
BO.b
VU.V
V0.6
V4.V
Vf.j
V2.B
Vl.O
V2.3
VI. 1)
V3.1
V9.3
•<4,6
ve.2
dV.3
V2 . 3
V3.1
V3.1
V2.3
V3.3
V2.b
3O.B
VI. 4
Vl.3
V4.V
bV.b
V3.U
vl .2
V3.V
VI. J
••4.3
V2.3
*4. 2
V3.3
V3.2
vs.a
V2.0
V4.4
V3.O
VII. 4
u.o
By. I
bV . f
VJ.O
0.0
NITHOlitN •
F tFFLUENT
.«..» UTMtH •»•••
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
Ib
lo
1
II
1
9
14
4V
24
f.
\
Ib
43
Ib
21)
3
20
23
1
1
2Q
3d
b
123
37
lo
20
1
10
as
4
3
11
4B
1
2
169
23
S
24
3
i
lo
U.S. TOTALS 1031101127764) 23.722 1.320 V4.1 27.J13 I,fb4 V3.3 2«7 32 7bl 134 37B
NUItb: 1. KLUnb IN tUBlC MtTtKi » 1000 2. AFfmHIMATt HaU IN ^AKtNTntbtb 3. MtTKIC TUNS * .V072 » SMU«T TONS
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
FEBRUARY 10, 19T7
TASLE 19
NUMBER AND FLOW OF EXISTIN8 TREATMENT PLANTS NHICH KILL/KILL NOT MEET SECONDARY REQUIREMENTS
FLO* IN THOUSANDS OF CUBIC METEHS/DAY
KILL OISCHAROE MEET
IS REQUIRED TREATMENT
NO
191
5
58
216
870
93
37
20
1
100
316
1*
22
594
190
622
320
140
179
26
54
39
182
3)0
»TZ,
381
•2
168
21
27
13*
55
30*
1B3
76
494
327
13
243
9
207
71
icr
SIS
27
32
zza
90
•I
29S
70
2
2
26
3
2
DOES DISCHARBE
MEET SECONDARY?
(ITEM 25)
FLO* YES
899.95
60.22
230.72
486.77
5,753.14
1,302.63
818.10
287.80
1.101.55
1,008.95
1,354,56
93.76
200.24
6f994.68
1,742.27
1,149.97
676.90
449.44
740.95
118.78
1>12B.16
465.87
5,986.98
1,356.90
1,410.44
1,837.55
318.62
445.15
98.60
1S8.S3
3,275.17
150.57
7(739.91
949.47
62.06
4,707.04
626,24
441.64
3,557.37
299.46
1,178.70
163.03
1,024,71
2,803.87
470.90
119.92
629.96
1,360.59
304.72
1,769.90
114.69
1.74
3S.35
392.43
1.89
17.96
SO
7
33
20
295
47
64
3
0
164
85
17
13
147
84
93
36
73
54
51
69
53
140
183
24
122
8
31
23
22
86
21
221
117
56
111
51
92
354
6
53
10
122
355
25
32
260
25
37
173
FLOW
615.30
15.74
397.99
86.04
2,713.87
102.58
671.30
23.99
0.00
1,173.11
715.27
21.04
70.90
1,091.71
937.83
162.65
172.41
406.81
208.76
213.76
225.45
466.58
776.61
335.95
168.67
343.45
30.15
132.61
220.76
36.71
499.22
163.36
1.059.4*
799.88
52.42
931.58
271.76
866.40
3,«61.94
52.84
224.66
12.46
777.41
1,989.87
325.31
444.06
724.79
248.05
83.96
454.43
17.33
0.00
2,64
2.11
0.00
0.00
NO
194
6
62
214
272
83
32
19
0
125
321
16
23
559
191
600
306
138
167
25
41
38
187
321
171
323
85
185
21
33
153
56
300
191
64
493
320
11
230
8
208
56
118
680
16
33
231
90
70
307
67
a
4
2S
2
2
SECONDARY BY
JULY 1, 19777
(ITEM 26)
FLOW YES
778.62
55.11
246.69
453.00
$,077.63
699.06
679.82
21.95
0.00
780.26
1,334,13
85.13
203.65
7,275.75
2,113.43
923.22
608.80
366.61
609.75
116.47
361.65
447.05
4,486.31
1,433.15
1,414.04
1,811.84
211.68
436.25
285.26
165.30
2,961,55
143.53
5.250*47
999.66
89.48
4,697.59
540.36
133.62
3,394.94
249,91
867.65
142.29
1,114,65
3,370.35
59.65
122.23
849.14
U272.88
276.10
1 (531.57
71.67
1.74
38. 00
391.71
1.32
17.98
47
6
29
22
290
58
69
4
1
138
60
15
12
182
83
105
47
75
66
52
83
SO
135
172
25
135
20
30
23
16
66
20
223
1<3
175
113
se
93
356
7
52
31
111
188
37
31
239
25
48
161
12
0
0
2
1
0
FLOX
736.63
20.85
382.02
119.81
3,383.77
706.43
809.58
289.84
1,101.55
1,401.61
735.70
29.67
67.49
810.64
566.67
383.72
238.47
489.64
339.96
216.07
991.96
485.40
1,377.28
4S9.70
165.06
321.76
151.64
138.75
34.10
29.94
811.89
170.40
3,546.51
749.70
65.90
941.04
357.64
1,224.42
3,594.79
102.39
"535.71
34.16
687.54
1(419.00
737.01
441.75
415.90
335.76
112.04
692.76
60.60
0.00
0.00
2.83
0.56
o.oo
LEVEL MORE STRINGENT
THAN SECONDARY?
(ITEM 27)
NO FLO* YES FLOW
154
11
85
100
446
92
70
0
0
88
19S
30
29
117
S3
528
346
72
203
69
20
S»
SO
31
63
489
117
225
33
39
83
67
299
95
245
SB
28
26
255
11
154
96
97
30
6
34
321
lit
94
253
63
2
4
22
3
1
758.40
67.64
626.44
281.03
6,232.18
531.43
1,208.18
0.00
0.00
1,009.89
632.96
114.73
184.46
284.85
414.19
498.65
814.81
217.24
784,24
307.98
92.81
675.84
228.14
153. VI
282.80
2,066.06
343.28
438.81
218.72
167.39
2(266.36
302.06
5,838.24
365.60
157.62
230.56
153.74
500.89
2(381.03
300.18
634.39
53.73
645.86
66.79
94.67
449.40
801.06
916.18
238.85
523.21
133.38
1.74
38.00
383.61
1.69
12.30
88
1
6
119
121
56
31
22
1
irs
206
0
6
624
221
182
4
141
30
7
104
29
242
462
133
6
2
9
11
9
134
9
217
206
15
547
350
79
319
4
106
20
132
834
62
30
112
5
26
215
756.85
8.32
2.27
256.49
2,236.26
866.22
281,21
311.00
1(101.55
1(171,91
1(436.68
0.00
86.66
7(801.54
2(265.90
808.67
28.46
639.01
169.47
22.66
1(260.80
256.61
5,635.45
1(738.94
1,296.31
88.33
21.27
140.16
100.6S
27.10
1,491,49
11.93
2,924.07
1(363.76
3.78
5,406.06
744.25
837.16
4(594.69
92.12
768.96
129.97
1(156.32
4,696.25
714.00
114.58
377.25
692.46
190.54
1,701.12
0.86
0.06
0.06
10.93
0.00
5.67
ALABAMA
ALASKA
AHIIONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
UIST. OF COLUM.
FLOHIOA
UEOHSIA
MAMAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
I OKA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA"
NEK HAMPSHIRE
NEK JERSEY
NEK MEXICO
NEK YORK'
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA '
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
URCIiON
HfcNNSYLVANIA
HHOUE ISLAND
SOUTH CAHOL1NA
SOUtH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIR8INIA
•ASHINSTON
KtSf VlABlNlA
KliCONSlN
KYOHINS
AMERICAN SAMOA
ttUAM
PUERTO HICO
HAC, TR. TERR.
VIKSIN ISLANDS
U.S. TOTALS 8,472 70(247.83 4,234 26,004.28 8(509 62(071.97
NOTEI FLOW IN THOUSANDS OF CUBIC METERS PER DAY/3.769411B • MOD
4,231 34(026.48
6,326 37(166.61
6,461 56(608.62
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
FEBRUARY 10> 19T7
TABLE 20
POPULATION! FLOW AND REMOVAL MATES Of EXISTIN6 TREATMENT PLANTS WHICH HILL NOT/KILL MEET SECONDARY REQUIREMENTS
FLOM IN THOUSANDS OF CUBIC METERS/DAT
FACILITIES WHICH HILL NOT MEET
SECONDARY REQUIREMENTS BY JULY It 1977
9REATER THAN
SECONDARY REQUIRED 7
YES NO
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
OtLAWAHE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
StORGIA
HAWAII
IOAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
I DMA
KANSAS
KtNTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOUHI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NLW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JERSEY
NbW MEXICO
NtW YOHK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OKESON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
WASHINGTON
•tST VIRGINIA
WISCONSIN
ITYOMINb
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TH. TEKR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
U. S. TOTALS
NUMBER
19T
6
62
218
272
83
32
16
0
126
321
16
24
559
191
609
300
131
176
25
41
39
189
321
181
328
87
IBS
21
32
149
67
296
19*
64
493
321
11
243
8
210
57
119
684
16
33
218
90
86
307
70
2
4
25
2
2
FLOW
778.62
55.11
246.69
477.69
5.077.43
691.63
679.82
21.16
0.00
784.61
1.334.13
05.13
203.84
7.27S.7S
2.113.43
923.45
605.48
366.61
646.58
116.47
361.65
447. OS
4i486.31
1.433.15
I«419.90
1. 812. 98
211.78
436.25
285.26
164.55
2(945.95
154.32
5(218.41
1(003.06
89.48
4(697.59
541.07
133.62
3(487.52
249.91
868.1V
185.44
1(114. »1
3(388.18
S>9.65
122.23
826.01
1(272.88
284.17
U&31.57
77.53
1.74
38.00
391.71
1.32
17.90
POPULATION
SE.KVED
1(015(207
142(431
592(908
884.901
10(520(316
716(943
809(905
31.354
0
1(5116.063
1(447(601
164(758
219(895
8(377(565
2(463.277
1(558(865
1(223(233
725(994
1(276(258
101. 55S
401.180
542.369
4(914(083
2(368(443
879(901
2(750(102
1*7.062
7V2.874
500.452
216.051
4(361.606
341(629
8(026(853
1(273(084
204(995
7(159(986
1(220(949
l«l) (066
5(074(611
243.876
974.006
278.890
9*4.773
6(683(868
1 7(642
12*. 26*
1(363.821
1(401(939
474(234
2(133.758
15#i232
1.400
67.180
994'. 331
2.500
44(000
8(571
62(246.16 91(806(047
69
0
4
111
49
34
a
18
0
77
165
0
3
488
161
144
4
89
25
3
33
13
ISM
302
113
1
1
7
6
5
91
5
108
120
0
460
296
5
135
1
84
14
72
653
13
16
33
2
14
158
0
0
0
5
0
1
4(385
128
6
58
107
223
.49
24
0
0
49
1*5
16
21
71
30
465
296
49
151
22
- 8
26
31
19
68
327
86
178
IS
27
58
52
188
77
64
32
24
6
107
7
126
42
47
30
3
17
185
88
72
149
70
2
4
20
2
1
4(186
FACILITIES WHICH WILL MEET
SECONDARY REQUIREMENTS BY JULY 1.
1977
NUMBER
47
6
29
22
295
62
69
4
1
137
80
15
12
182
83
105
49
75
67
51
85
SO
136
172
25
141
20
31
23
16
66
20
222
103
175
113
58
93
363
7
52
31
111
189
38
31
230
25
49
161
12
0
0
2
1
0
FLOW
736.63
20.85
382.02
119.81
3(393.88
708.36
809.58
289.84
1(101.55
1.401.54
735.70
33.38
67.49
810.64
566.67
383.72
236.65
489.64
343.37
214.36
992.04
485.40
1(377.28
459.70
165.08
322.32
151.64
140.94
34.10
29.94
811.89
170.40
3(546.43
749.70
65.90
941.04
357.64
1(224.42
3(652.56
102.39
535.71
34.16
687.54
1(420.93
737.54
441.75
579.54
335.76
112.23
692.76
60.60
0.00
0.00
2.83
0.56
0.00
POPULATION
SERVED
927(858
37(626
1(064(460
155.164
7(198(552
1(321(954
1(079(020
81i789
758(000
•2(664(053
1(139(876
34(636
101(946
1(439(178
754(377
664(468
497(646
458(295
1(213(998
269(799
1(367(963
708(773
1(695(890
825(766
257(208
473.150
260.293
278(305
64(170
55(711
1(592(263
323(119
4(718(442
1(119(568
186(077
1(199(325
773(133
1(634(558
4(078(920
129(272
299.690
73(430
1(105(682
2(984(079
928(174
87(643
1(218.036
534(847
242(415
864(879
122(307
0
0
8(760
1(500
0
REMOVAL RATE
BOO t S.S.
71.31
74.47
71.81
86.95
83.04
87.89
79.99
85.66
78.88
88.41
82.52
72.84
89.23
82.83
81.77
81.64
84.64
68.25
79.68
79.76
88.96
82.37
74.29
84.98
77.02
83.86
79.22
76.15
78.51
76.49
86.25
86.21
87.84
81.00
92.22
80.46
88.56
86.93
85.94
72,48
77.12
82.86
84. is
87.77
83.92
87.06
87.83
74.99
79.99
73.86
68.36
0.00
0.00
88.88
88.00
0.00
4(252
34(268.68 52(076(051
81.64
• REMOVAL NATE • TOTAL EFFLUENT/TOTAL INFLUENT
NOTEI FLOW IN THOUSANDS OF CUBIC METERS PER DAY/3.7854118 • MOD
-------
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE 21
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
NUMBER OF FACILITIES AND REASONS FOR TREATMENT MOM STRINGENT THAN SECONDARY
•••••••••••REASONS FOR TREATMENT LEVEL 8EIN8 MORE STRINGENT THAN SECONDARY**********
STATE
NUMBER
TOTAL REQUIRINO
NUMBEH OF MORE STRINGENT
FACILITIES TREATMENT
EPA-APPROVEO STATE FEDERAL OtSCHAHOE STATE OR FEDERAL
HATER OUALlTf COURT COURT PERMIT ENFORCEMENT VOLUNTARY STATE
PLAN ORDER ORDER CONDITIONS ORDER COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE OTHER
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNECTICUT
DELAWARE
OIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
BEOK3IA
HAkAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOHA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
HAKVLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEUHASKA
NEVADA
NEK HAMPSHIRE
NEK JEHStT
NED MEXICO
NEK YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
OREGON
PENNSYLVANIA
MHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TENNESSEE
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VIRGINIA
MASMINS1 ON
KESt VIRGINIA
•iscoNSi* •
•VOMINO
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
PUERTO RICO
PAC. TH. TERR.
VIRGIN ISLANDS
310
125
163
428
801
187
US
30
1
326
592
55
91
1.119
481
1.098
426
328
355
136
292
126
393
596
214
770
135
322
67
101
254
101
1>013
410
357
847
448
114
1.073
22
366
144
340
998
116
96
644
160
542
»n
87
6
7
34
39
4
U.Sf TOTALS
1V.041
103
3
9
235
129
64
31
27
1
224
285
0
T
970
402
203
4
231
48
17
247
37
277
961
139
11
9
.9
12
35
155
14
381
282
15
777
414
86
924
7
201
22
201
959
109
37
164
8
86
251'
0
0
0
6
0
1
9.036
10
0
0
6
11
52
7
25
0
14
141
0
1
8
1
IS
0
57
2
0
245
12
125
0
14
0
1
1
2
3
4
0
9
88
0
126
326
18
157
2
20
8
22
7
0
19
120
1
63
'S'
0
0
•8
0
4
6
1
I
0
1
0
0
0
310
6
0
0
1
0
3
0
1
118
56
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
0
9
1
0
95
0
0
76
0
1
0
6
0
1
3
1
0
0
1-3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
11
2
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
317
8
5
1
0
0
2
0
0
13
404
0
1
0
0
0
0
97
0
14
3
0
28
0
0
18
0
26
1
4
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
72
1
1
143
95
1
11
20
1
74
14
0
3
18
177
151
3
87
25
1
104
7
14
12
109
4
0
9
9
2
7
22
18
30
15
301
71
88
334
2
46
5
ISO
3
3
1
72
5
19
7
0
0
0
1
0
0
1.745
737
931
2*367
0
6
0
0
o
43
89
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
31
46
1
0
0
0
0
7
59
0
32
0
0
11
0
0
28
0
3
0
0
24
3
0
0
4
1
29
0
0
0
1
0
0
428
1
0
0
4
0
0
41
38
1
8
93
16
10
3
0
9
131
0
3
96
111
31
1
16
32
12
0
13
7
31
41
2
3
0
1
17
6
5
298
56
0
162
26
2
64
3
124
8
40
909
0
16
7
0
9
ISO
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
1
0
10
0
0
i
0
165
30
0
0
187
10
30
2
lit
1
2
0
2
2
2
11
5
5
0
0
5
1
0
10
139
0
61
1
0
2
8
IS
0
23
9
103
4
1
0
1
3«
0
0
0
0
0
1
2.613
1.005
-------
19T6 NEEDS SURVEY
PROJECTED CHANGE IN TREATMENT PROCESS USE
NUMBERS Of FACILITIES ANO ASSOCIATED FLO*
FLOW IN THOUSANDS OF CUBIC METERS PER DAY
UNITED STATES TOTAL
FEBRUARY 10f 1977
TABLE 22
PRELIMINARY TREATMENT
LNLAH6E
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
INSTALL IN NEW PLANT
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANSE
OTHER
TOTALS
NUMBER
It 030
248
339
10
138
663
2.055
11
4.494
NOW IN USE
FLO*
15.33*
3,582
3,506
99
2(286
2 • BSD
20,782
343
48,790
(4,050)
(946)
(9261
(26)
(604)
(7S5)
(5,4901
(90)
12,887
UNDER
REQUIRED BUT
NOT YET
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER
20
2
5
1»6
0
0
33
1
FLO*
1,304
1,514
107
1,764
0
0
241
30
1344)
(399)
(28)
(466)
(0)
(0)
(63)
(7)
NUMBER
2
9
3
2,936
7
1
7
10
FUNDED
FLO*
12
4
5
9.729
46
1
42
30
(3)
(1)
11)
(2.570)
(12)
10)
(11)
(T)
2S7
4,960
1,307
.975
9,869
2. 60S
PUMPING
tNLAKCE
UP6NAOK
fcNLAKGE AND UPGRADE
INSTALL IN Nil PLANT
HEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTALS
NO* IN USE
NUMBER
516
85
163
13
68
360
968
12
FLO*
8(497
1,426
2(660
400
1(837
1,258
10(421
351
(2(244)
(376)
(702)
(105)
(485)
(332)
(2(752)
(921
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER FLO*
2,205
26(850
7,088
7
2
2
110
1
1
a
1
132
247
181
2
89S
2
1
117
30
1,476
(65)
(47)
(0)
(236)
(0)
(0)
(31)
(7)
386
REQUIRED OUT
NUMBER
0
3
0
1,473
1
0
0
2
NOT YET
FUNDED
FLO*
0
5
0
7<420
13
0
0
14
(0)
(1)
(0)
(1,960)
(3)
(0)
(0)
(31
1(479
7.452
1(967
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION
ENLARGE
UPORAOE
tNLAHGE AND UPORAOE
INSTALL IN Nt« PLANT
HEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTALS
NUMBER
816
340
487
12
149
761
1(525
11
4(101
NO* IN USE
FLOM
10(967
5,295
4(459
86
905
2(888
18(046
158
42(804
(2(897)
(1.398)
11.178)
(22)
(239)
(763)
14(7671
(41)
11.305
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER FLO*
NUMBER
REQUIRED BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
FLO*
9
4
9
12S
6
0
28
3
1,180
119
923
1,568
79
0
246
25
(311)
(3D
(243)
1414)
(20)
(0)
(64)
(6)
7
9
6
1.817
0
2
6
18
112
140
103
7,441
0
15
2
82
(291
(37)
(271
(1.965)
(0)
(3)
(0)
(21)
184
4,140
1,089
1,865
7.895
2.082
-------
1976 NEEOS SURVEY
PROJECTED CHANGE IN TREATMENT PROCESS USE
NUMBERS Of FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED FLO*
FLO* IN THOUSANDS OF CUBIC METEHS PER DAY
UNITED STATES TOTAL
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE 22
TRICKLINS FILTER
tNLAHBE
UPGRADE
tNLARGE AND UHBRAUt
INSTALL IN NE* PLANT
NEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTALS
NO* IN USE
NUMBER
331
336
331
0
144
bl3
£79
6
FLO*
3,437
1.569
1.7«b
0
373
2.750
3.910
86
(908)
(414)
(461)
(0)
(98)
(726)
(1.0321
(221
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER FLO*
2.2*0
13.871
3,661
2
1
2
25
0
0
11
1
42
REQUIRED BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
NUMBER FLOM
26b
227
96
267
0
0
88
2
V46
(70)
(59)
(2b)
(70)
(0)
(0)
(23)
(0)
247
7
8
2
125
0
2
4
60
208
76
314
30
717
0
26
28
524
1.715
(201
1
102
*0
1,353
1.BT9
1,291
b>192
b3
4
1 ,725
I.BOB
(357)
(496)
(341)
(1.J71)
(14)
11)
(455)
(477)
9
106
35
5.391
5
19
30
271
122
1,926
1.1*0
30,205
81
40
717
3,521
(32)
1508)
(306)
(7, 979)
(21)
(10)
(189)
(930)
13,305
3,512
5,866
37.772
9,975
FILTRATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
INSTALL IN NEH PLANT
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
UTHER
TOTALS
NUMBER,
103
4S
62
9
8
128
302
6
NOD IN USE
FLOW
653
166
247
417
137
537
1,367
21
(172)
(43)
(65)
(110)
(36)
(142)
(361)
(5)
663
3,545
934
UNDER
REQUIRED BUT
NOT YET
CONSTRUCTION
NUMUER
9
12
9
90
0
1
70
17
FLOM
352
1,036
818
3,982
0
1
637
263
(93)
1273)
(216)
(1,0521
(0)
(0)
(1681
(69)
NUMBER
22
ISO
47
3,560
1
• 22
27
444
FUNDED
FLOW
35
1,397
539
20,877
3
20
2,439
12,997
(9)
(369)
(142)
(5.515)
(0)
(5)
(644)
(3,433)
zoa
7,089
1,871
4,273
38,307
10,117
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
PROJECTED CHANOt IN TREATMENT PROCESS USE
NUMBERS OF FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED FLUH
FLO* IN THOUSANDS OF cuaic METERS PER DAT
UNITED STATES TOTAL
FEBRUARY lOi 1977
TABLE 22
ACIIVATEU CAHBON
tNLAKBt
UPGHAOt
tWLARSE AND UPtirtAUE
INSTALL IN Nt» PLANT
HEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
UTMtR
rolALS
NUMBER
2
0
0
2
0
2
a
i
is
NOW IN USE
FLOM
1
0
o
10
o
*
SB
39
147
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(2)
(23)
(10)
37
NUMBER
1
2
2
6
0
0
2
0
13
UNOEH
CONSTRUCTION
FLO*
136
183
45
4311
0
0
111
0
820
on
(US)
(0)
213
NUMBER
0
5
3
250
0
0
0
a
269
REQUIRED BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
fi.au
0
137
246
1,914
0
0
0
145
(0)
(36)
(65)
1505)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(38)
2,4*2
644
1*0 SIAlit TtHTlAHT LIME
tNLAHGE
UPGRADE
LNLAKUE ANU UfbHAUt
INSTALL IN ML* PLANT
MEPLACE
AMANOUN
NO CHANGE
TUIALb
1
3
9
0
0
1
2
0
16
NOM IN USE
FLO»
0
0
1
IV
0
(0)
(130)
(13)
(0)
(01
(0)
(SI
(0)
NUMBER
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
4
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
FLO*
0
90
0
272
0
0
0
27
(0)
(23)
(711
(0)
(0)
(0)
(7)
101
NUMBIK
2
4
2
2«
0
0
0
12
REUUIflEO BUT
NOT VET
FUNDED
FLO*
16
3
0
S71
0
0
0
66
(4)
(0)
(0)
(1501
(0)
(0)
(0)
(17)
656
171
DIOLOblCAL N1TH1F1CATION
tNLAHttt
UPGKAUt
bNLAHUE AND UPURADL
INSTALL IN NEl PLANT
KEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
VTHEH
TOTAL*
NUMutH
S
2
10
0
0
0
14
I
32
NOD IN USt
FLO*
41
SO
U
0
0
.368
3S
691
(52)
(10)
113)
(01
(0)
(0)
1971
(91
181
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUH8EM FLOH
2
I
2
JO
U
0
1
1
11
172
4
242
2>47S
0
0
0
3
(45)
(1)
163)
(6S4)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(01
763
NUMBER
1
S9
S
474
0
0
1
44
SB4
REQUIRED HUT
NOT YE 7
FUNDED
FLO*
2
1,010
119
9«82» (2
0
0
0
647
10)
1266)
(31)
.596)
(01
101
(0)
(171)
11,606
3>064
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
PROJECTED CHANGE IN TREATMENT PROCESS USE
NUMBERS OF FACILITIES ANA ASSOCIATED FLOM
FLO* IN THOUSANDS OF CUBIC NETEKS PER DAY
UNITED STATES TOTAL
FEBRUARY lOt 1977
TABLE 22
BIQLU&ICAL DEVITRIFICATION
ENLARGE
UP8KAOE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
INSTALL IN NEH PLANT
HEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTALS
NUMBER
2
0
0
1
0
0
T
1
NOW IN USE
FLOW
179
0
o
3
0
0
125
39
UT>
(0)
10)
(0)
10)
10)
(33)
CIO)
11
346
90
NUMBEf
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
) FLOM
113
0
15
141
0
0
0
) 0
r 26*
(29)
(0)
(3)
(3T)
10)
(0)
(0)
(0)
69
NUMBER
0
37
1
80
0
0
0
2
120
REQUIRED BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
FLOM
0
36S
21
2.591
0
0
0
4
2t981
196)
IS)
1684)
(0)
(II
786
ION EXCHANGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
INSTALL IN NtM PLANT
KEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTALS
NUMBER
0
NO* IN USE
FLO*
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
NUMBER
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
a
UNDEI
CONSTRUI
FLO)
26
261
\
:TION
*
(01
(0)
(69)
(0)
(0)
10)
) (0)
k 69
NUMBER
REQUIRED BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
FLOW
(01
(0)
(0>
(0)
(0)
BREAKPOINT CHLORINATION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
INSTALL IN NEK PLANT
HEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTALS
NUMBER
2
9
4
0
0
5
10
0
MOW IN USE
FLOM
s
27
39
0
0
13
Bl
0
ID
IT)
(10)
(0)
10)
13)
(21)
(0)
30
I6S
NUMBER
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
FLOM
0
2
(0)
(0)
(0)
10)
It)
(0)
(0)
(0)
.REQUIRED BUT
NUMBER
0
10
2
47
0
0
0
23
NOT YET
FUNDED
FLO*
0
16
S4
359
0
0
0
47
(01
C4>
114)
194)
(0>
(0)
(0)
(12)
82
476
124
-------
197* NEEDS SURVEY
PROJECTED CHANGE IN TREATMENT PROCESS USE
NUMBERS OF FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED FLO*
FLOW IN THOUSANDS OF CUBIC METERS PER DAY
UNITED STATES TOTAL
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE 22
AMMONIA STRIPPING
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE ANU UPGRADE
INSTALL IN NEK PLANT
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTALS
NUMBER
3
14
6
0
0
1
17
0
NO* IN USE
FLO*
»6
22
3b
0
0
2
63
0
(25)
IS)
(9)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(16)
(0)
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER FLOH
41
218
I
0
2
16
0
0
0
1
20
2
0
1
118
0
0
0
0
121
(0)
(0)
<0>
Oil
(0)
(0)
(0)
(0)
31
REQUIRED BUT
NUMBER
0
41
9
209
0
0
0
20
NOT YET
FUNDED
FLOW
0
46
36
1.05*
0
0
0
T6
(0)
(12)
(9)
(278)
(0)
(0)
(0)
(20)
279
1,212
319
DISINFECTION
ENLARGE
UPGRADE
tNLARGE AND UPGRADE
INSTALL IN NEW PLANT
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
UTHEK
TOTALS
NO* IN USE
NUMBER
1.035
207
358
22
J29
645
2,138
13
FLOW
16,020
1
10)
(0)
(1)
204
907
239
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
PROJECTED CHANGE IN TREATMENT PROCESS USE
NUMBERS OF FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED FLOW
FLO* IN THOUSANDS OF CUBIC METERS PER DAY
UNITED STATES TOTAL
FEBRUARY 10i 1977
TABLE 22
OXIDATION PONDS
tNLAHBE
UPGHADE
LNLAH6E ANU UPbHAUt
INSTALL IN NEW PLANT
HEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHEH
TOTALS
NOW IN USE
NUMBER
597
609
555
9
149
1>291
1.553
32
FLOW
1(513
458
1(328
7
1(191
2(240
2(604
V
(399)
(121)
(351)
(1)
(314)
(591)
(6BB)
(2)
4.7V5
9t350
2.46?
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER FLOW
NUMBER
REOUIREO BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
FLOW
8
22
2
140
0
2
38
4
303
4«
10
160
0
30
389
60
(801
113)
(2)
(42)
(0)
(8)
(102)
115)
3
49
Zl
2(228
7
2 '
22
197
1
193
7*
2(383
37
0
33
70S
(0)
(50)
(19)
1629)
(9)
(0)
(184)
210
1.001
262
2(S29
3(426
901
OTHtH TREATMENT
tNLANlit
UPGRADE
tNLAHGE AND UPttHADt
INSTALL IN NEW PLANT
MEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
UTHEH
TOTALS
NOW IN USE
NUM6EH
337
184
477
14
90
492
771
10
FLOW
3(730
877
3(937
73
1(384
1(638
9(3SO
28
(98S)
(23)1
11(040)
(19)
(365)
(432)
(2(470)
(7)
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER
16
18
7
ISO
0
3
48
22
FLOW
530
1(260
988
3*432
0
1
370
648
(140)
(33Z)
(261)
(D06)
(0)
(0)
(97)
(171)
NUMBER
2
122
60
3(421
7
9
34
3SS
HEOUIRED BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
FLOW
19
1(104
536
23(174
18
28
18*
12(43*
(SI
(291)
(1*1)
16(121)
1*1
IS)
(4$)
(3(28*)
2(375 21t017
5(549
264
7(22*
1(«07
4(010
37(*91
9>899
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
PROJECTED CHAN6E IN SLU08E UNIT PROCESS USE
NUMBERS OF FACILITIES UNO ASSOCIATED VOLUME
UN METRIC TONS PER DAY)
UNITED STATES TOTAL
FEBRUARY 10> 1977
TABLE 23
ANAbMOBIC DIGESTION
NOW IN USE
NUMBER 'VOLUME
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER "VOLUME
REQUIRED BUT
NOT VET
FUNDED
NUMBER VOLUME
tNLAHSE
UPBRAOE
ENLAHBE AND UP6RADE
INSTALL IN NIK PLANT
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTALS
1.149
563
871
9
1*3
lillT
21033
39
2>339
TS1
1.S55
19
169
BIO
*>19B
76
9.917
20
20
16
164
7
1
48
21
297
201
215
473
912
47
0
147
209
2*204
6
42
19
3 > 996
4
2
21
189
3.379
52
67
26
2.772
12
0
17
252
3.198
MEAT THEATNENT
NOW IN USE
NUMBER VOLUME
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER VOLUME
ENLAH6E
UPGRADE
LNLAR6E AND UH6RAOE
INSTALL IN NEW PLANT
MEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CMAN6E
OTHER
TOTALS
46
11
24
0
0
39
BO
4
204
130
52
1S6
0
0
40
614
9
1.001
1
3
2
24
3
0
8
9
50
23
46
71
298
12
0
226
386
1.062
REQUIRED BUT
NOT TET
FUNDED
NUMBER VOLUME
11
4
75
0
i
3
31
125
0
165
36
646
0
0
24
572
1.443
AIM DRYING
ENLAR6C
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPBRADE
INSTALL IN NEV PLANT
MEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANBE
UTHER
NOW IN USE
NUMBER VOLUME
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER VOLUME
REOUIRED BUT
NOT VET
FUNDED
NUMBER VOLUME
1.485
439
701
26
142
911
2.453
26
311
782
5
81
684
2.944
25
20
12
9
175
5
2
52
13
146
38
66
386
3
0
30
38
5
26
22
3,663
7
2
27
160
19
13
25
21451
4
0
19
1B7
TOTALS
6.183
6.745
288
707
3.912
2.718
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
PROJECTED CHANSt IN SLUOSE UNIT PROCESS USE
NUMBERS OF FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED'VOLUME
(IN METRIC TONS PEH DAY)
UNITED STATES TOTAL
FEBRUARY 10t 1977
TABLE 23
DENATERINO
tNLARBE
UPSRADE
ENLAM6E AND UPGRADE
INSTALL IN NE« PLANT
REPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANCE
OTHER
TOTALS
NOW IN USE
NUHtiER VOLUME
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER 'VOLUME
327
69
1*5
4
IB
160
S73
11
1.307
1(497
200
1,471
131
63
280
2i»71
72
4,485
7
140
1
0
SI
17
241
161
166
211
976
8
0
1(652
267
3.4+1
REQUIRED BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
NUMBER VOLUME
7
66
IS
It 476
2
6
8
127
1,707
12
492
129
4.039
14
1
92
1.115
5,894
INCINERATION
tNLAROE
UPSRAOE
tNLAMOE AND UPWIAOt
INSTALL IN Nt» PLANT
HEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTALS
NO* IN USE
NUMBER VOLUME
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER VOLUME
308
132
322
4
SI
252
490
9
1,568
1,831
3S4
1.242
IS
366
149
2,247
15
6*219
6
10
7
59
0
0
18
s
IDS
97
157
562
1(653
0
«
1.551
153
4(173
REQUIRED BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
NUMBER VOLUME
3
47
10
801
1
0
s
46
913
2
1(346
124
2(481
3
0
71
937
4(964
RECALCINATION
tNLAHUE
UPGRADE
tNLAMOE AND UHBHADt
INSTALL IN NtH PLANT
HEPLACC
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
UTHER
TOTALS
NOW IN USE
NUMBER VOLUME
44
18
22
0
5
46
83
6
224
302
43
207
0
127
42
1(489
3
2t213
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER VOLUME
REQUIRED BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
NUMBER VOLUME
5
11
5
14
0
1
16
15
67
Bl
113
230
174
0
0
313
91
1(002
3
32
6
iia
o
i
2
39
201
24
218
42'
480
0
«
18
406
1,186
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
PROJECTED CHANGE IN SLUD6E UNIT PROCESS USE
NUMBERS OF FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED VOLUME
(IN METRIC TONS PER DAY)
UNITED STATES TOTAL
FEBRUARY 10t 1977
TABLE 23
LAND FILL
ENLAKSE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
INSTALL IN Nt« PLANT
HEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTHER
TOTALS
NOM IN USE
NUMBER VOLUME
234
36
63
3
1$
295
1*369
4
2i019
826
76
377
0
9
202
It792
37
3.319
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER VOLUME
REQUIRED BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
NUMBER VOLUME
3
3
0
106
1
1
14
0
128
41
41
0
343
8
0
46
0
479
2
11
1
Ii765
0
0
a
1.78»
25
108
0
It 607
0
0
0
U
1.752
LAND SPREADING OF SLUOOt
NO* IN USE
NUMBER VOLUME
ENLARGE
UP6RAOE
ENLAMGE ANU UPORAOE
INSTALL IN Nt« PLANT
HEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANGE
OTMEH
TOTALS
93
25
74
4
4
80
3H3
I
664
317
U
61
0
1
ai
366
0
837
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER VOLUME
1
0
0
28
0
0
4
3
36
61
0
0
5T
0
0
1
16
135
REQUIRED
BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
NUMBER
0
1
6
294
6
0
0
21
VOLUME
0
0
1
1.033
14
0
0
50
328
1<098
OCEAN DUMPING
tNLAHGE
UPGRADE
ENLARGE AND UPGRADE
INSTALL IN NtlT PLANT
HEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHAN6E
UTHER
NOW IN USE
NUMBER VOLUME
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER VOLUME
2
0
1
0
2
31
4
0
0
0
0
0
J27
678
4
0
REQUIRED BUT
NUMBER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NOT YET
FUNDED
VOLUME
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
40
809
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
PROJECTED CMANSE IN SLUD8E UNIT PROCESS USE
NUMBERS OF FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED VOLUME
(IN METRIC TONS PER DAY)
UNITED STATES TOTAL
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE 23
OTHEK SLUD6E HANDLING
UP6RAOE
LNLAKBE AND UPGRADE
INSTALL IN NEK PLANT
HEPLACE
ABANDON
NO CHANBE
OTHEM
TOTALS
NOW IN USE
NUMBER 'VOLUME
875
431
880
32
152
1.106
2.575
40
0.091
UNDER
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER VOLUME
l.VOB
77S
2»239
130
231
600
3tiS40
6*
9.187
22
28
15
249
*
5
46
31
204
300
344
1.412
12
1
1SS
432
2.B60
REQUIRED BUT
NOT YET
FUNDED
NUMBER VOLUME
5
55
27
3.729
4
6
23
160
4.009
37
162
91
41944
7
0
14
752
6.007
-------
1976 NEEDS SURVEY
PNESENT AND PROJECTED DAILY SLU06E VOLUMES
BY SLUOSE PROCESS
IN METRIC TONS PEH OAT
UMTtU STATES TOTAL
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE 24
PKUCtSi
PRESENT
PKOJECTEU
* CHANCE
ANAENOHIC DIGESTION
HEAT TREATMENT
AIM DRYING
DEMATENIMa
INC1NEHATION
MECALC1NATION
LAND FILL
LAND SPREADING OF SLUOOt
OCEAN DUMPING
OTHER SLU06E HANDLINS
9(888
1(002
6,686
6(680
6(219
2(209
J(30b
840
783
9(176
5(277
2,4*3
3*404
9.304
9(115
2(181
2(206
1(237
0
8(729
- 45
• 144
- 48
» 40
• 47
• 0
- 32
• 48
. 99
3
-------
1VT6 NEEDS SURVEY
TREATMENT PROCESS AND SLUDGE HANDLING SUMMARY
NUMBERS OF FACILITIES AND ASSOCIATED FLOU
ifLOx IN THOUSANDS OF CUBIC METERS PER DAY)
UNITED STATES TOTAL
NOH IN USE
NUMBER FLON
UNOE"
CONSTRUCTION
NUMBER FLOW
FEBRUARY lOl
TABLE zs
REQUIRED BUT
NOT VET
FUNDED
NUMBER FLOW
1977
PROCESSES
PRELIMINARY TREATMENT
PUMPIN6
PRIMARY SEDIMENTATION
TRICKLING FlLtE*
ACTIVATED SLUOtjt
FILTRATION
ACTIVATED CARBON
THO STAGE TERTIARY LIME
B10LOOICAL NITRIFICATION
HIOLOBICAL UENITRIFICATION
IUN EXCHANGE
BREAKPOINT CMLUR1NATION
AMMONIA STRIPPING
DISINFECTION
LAND TREATMENT Of EFFLUENT
OXIDATION PONflS
UIHER THEATMENT
SLUUGE HANOLIN8 METHODS
ANAEROBIC DIGESTION
HtAT TREATMENT
AIR DRYING
DtHATEHINO
INCINERATION
KtCALCINATION
LAND FILL
LAND SPREADING OF SLU06E
OCEAN DUMPING
OlMER SLUDGE MANOLIN8
4(033
663
12
16
32
1
30
41
56
206
6.183
1(309
'225
667
40
6.115
48(798
26(841
42.772
13.875
3.514
100
567
693
305
0
166
220
49.933
492
9.353
21(022
60(98«
5.478
39.765
37.620
37.311
12.242
19.622
4.»Z7
7.692
SS.BIO
2*7
132
IBS
42
563
20B
13
T
37
7
3
3
20
46S
10
216
269
294
50
2B6
241
IDS
6T
US
36
0
399
4.961
1.479
4.142
950
13.309
7.092
822
390
2.B9B
27«
264
3
122
Bf6B7
257
1(005
7(232
6t257
3.688
2(554
7(320
b(384
3>117
1(671
341
0
9(228
2(975
1(479
1(866
209
5(867
4(275
269
48
585
12»
3
«2
279
5(26S
204
2.530
4«010
3.351
122
3.724
1.701
913
201
1.781
324
0
3.950
9(676
7(455
7.900
1(718
37.783
38.314
2.443
65B
11(608
2(984
3
477
1.214
2«.«09
908
3(427
37.498
14(469
7.071
12.301
25.816
24.342
S.105
7(556
4.803
0
27(046
-------
1»7« NEEDS SURVEY
SURVEY SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS
CATEGORIES I THRU IV
FEBRUARY 10. 1977
TABLE 26
ALABAMA
ALASKA
ARIZONA
ARKANSAS
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
CONNEC11CUT
DELAWARE
DIST. OF COLUM.
FLORIDA
SEOR61A
HAWAII
IDAHO
ILLINOIS
INDIANA
IOWA
KANSAS
KENTUCKY
LOUISIANA
MAINE
MARYLAND
MASSACHUSETTS
MICHIGAN
MINNESOTA
MISSISSIPPI
MISSOURI
MONTANA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NEW HAMPSHIRE
NEW JEHSfcY
NEW MEXICO
NEW YORK
NORTH CAROLINA
NORTH DAKOTA
OHIO
OKLAHOMA
ORE SON
PENNSYLVANIA
RHODE ISLAND
SOUTH CAROLINA
SOUTH DAKOTA
TEXAS
UTAH
VERMONT
VlKBlHlA
WASHINGTON
NEST VIHU1NIA
WISCONSIN
VYOM2NS
AMERICAN SAMOA
GUAM
PUERTO HICO
PAC. TH. rCKM.
VJROIN ISLANDS
TOTAL
FACILITIES
126
180
*37
liOSU
221
150
4S
1
SOJ
81Q
Sb
20b
1.491
537
1.120
434
372
37»
237
35*
251
783
767
227
t>26
14b
32V
as
160
55»
113
Zil45
561
357
991
456
152
J.391
34
4Sb
;47
381
1,132
1S6
116
7S»
25 T
611
907
97
6
7
3*
39
4
NUMBER OF
NON-SAMPLE
FACILITIES
213
126
180
66
It 050
221
ISO
45
I
248
264
55
205
7S1
332
160
1ZO
92
184
237
3S2
2S1
533
312
4T
241
16
47
85
160
544
23
2.1»5
1*2
27
628
159
81
1> 233
34
4S5
60
381
701
1S6
116
785
2S7
611
907
7
6
7
34
39
4
NUM8ER OF
SAMPLE
FACILITIES
69
0
0
81
0
0
0
0
0
87
142
0
0
148
41
192
66
56
38
0
0
0
SO
»1
36
117
4B
96
0
0
2
20
0
86
4ft
109
60
15
263
0
0
55
0
94
0
0
0
0
0
0
2«
0
0
0
0
0
SAMPLE
PERCENT
34.0
100.0
100.0
21.8
100.0
100.0
100.0
loo.o
100.0
34.0
26.0
100.0
100.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
21.0
20.0
20.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
37.0
34.0
100.0
100.0
20.0
22.2
100.0
21.0
20.0
30.0
20.2
21.0
43.0
100.0
100.0
63.0
100.0
21. B
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
31.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
-------
III. FIGURES
A. List of Figures
FIGURE 1 Cost vs. Pipe Volume for Collector Sewers
FIGURE 2 Cost vs. Pipe Volume for Interceptor Sewers
FIGURE 3 Cost vs. Pipe Volume for Force llains used in
Collector Sewer Systems
FIGURE 4 Cost vs. Pipe Volume for Force Mains used in
Interceptor Sewer Systems
FIGURE 5 Cost vs. Capacity for Pumpinjj Stations used in
Collector Sewer Systems
FIGURE 6 Cost vs. Capacity for Pumping Stations used in
Interceptor Sewer Systems
FIGURE 7 Cost vs. Length of Gravity Sewers of Various
Diameters
FIGURE 8 Cost vs. Length of Force Ilains
F-l
-------
B. Explanation of Figures
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
Cost vs. Pipe Volume for Collector Sewers
Cost vs. Pipe Volume for Interceptor Sewers
Cost vs. Pipe Volume for Force Mains used in Collector
Sewer Systems
Cost vs. Pipe Volume for Force llains
Interceptor Sewer Systems
used
in
Cost vs. Capacity for Pumping Stations used in
Collector Sewer Systems
Cost vs. Capacity for pumping Stations used in
Interceptor Sewer Systems
Regression analyses of pipe and pumping
made and the results are presented in
Figures
s tat ion data
1 thru 6.
were
Figures 1 thru 4 show the observed relat
cost and the volume of pipe based on
comparable construction cost data obtained in
the lieeds Survey (Basis of Estimate codes
volumes are determined as Pi X (radius) squa
are made for costs versus volume for col
interceptor sewer systems in Figures 1 thru 4
cost of pipe is presented as ordinate i
and the volume of pipe is shown as abscissa i
ionships between the
firm estimates and
the field during
4 and 5). Pipe
red X length. Plots
lector sewers and
, respectively. The
s cale
scale.
n logarithmic
n logarithmic
It will be apparent to the experienced reader that while
cost curves for pipe are usually shown as cost vs. pipe
diameter, we noted that the correlation coefficients for
regression analyses of pipe data were significantly higher when
volume was plotted against cost as opposed to diameter against
cost. The implications of these findings are that the costs of
large diameter pipe usually associated with urban construction
constraints are significantly higher than si.iall diameter pipe
more commonly found in less densely populated areas. For
example, the cost of 60 inch diameter pipe is shown to be almost
100 times as expensive per linear foot as 6 inch pipe, even
though the diameter difference is only ten times.
Figures 5 and 6 show cost versus rated capacity for pumping
stations in collector and interceptor sewer systems,
respectively. The rated capacity is shown as abscissa in
logarithmic scale and the cost of pumping stations is presented
as ordinate in logarithmic scale.
F-2
-------
0
All correlation coefficients for these analyses are above
7. This indicates that the data for conveying systems
collected in the 1976 Heeds Survey reflect a definite correlation
between the cost of pipe and volume of pipe, and the cost of
pumping stations and rated pumping capacity of pumping stations.
Each figure contains the appropriate correlation coefficient and
equat ion.
FIGURE 7 Cost vs. Length of Gravity Sewers of Various Diameters
FIGURE 8 Cost vs. Length of Force llains
Both Fisures 7 and 8 were plotted using data which was
reported under basis of estimate codes 4 (engineer/consultant
firm estimate) and 5 (cost of previous comparable construction).
Sone 3628 data points were used to plot the curves in Figure 7
and 699 data points were used to plot the curves in Figure 8.
These figures represent National cost averages only. EPA is
in the process of utilising the available data to develop a set
of local cost factors.
F-3
-------
108- =
CO
cc
107
106
§ 105
O in4
O IU^
103
102
02772 V
R=0.887
1.06
1 10 102 103 104 105 106 10? 108
PIPE VOLUME IN CUBIC FEET
COST VS PIPE VOLUME FOR COLLECTOR SEWERS
(COSTS BASED ON FIRM ENGINEERING ESTIMATES AND BID DATA)
-------
io°-
10?
co 106'
tr
_i
o 105
z
CO
o 1Q4-
103
102-
C=18.17 V1'11
R= 0.869
/
/
/
I
f
1
j
/^
/
y
~~f
'
. .
-/
'..
4
1 —
i
:::i
10 102 103 104 105 106
PIPE VOLUME IN CUBIC FEET
107
108
COST VS PIPE VOLUME FOR INTERCEPTOR SEWERS
(COSTS BASED ON FIRM ENGINEERING ESTIMATES AND BID DATA)
-------
C=212.74 V
R=0.961
102
10
102 103 104 105 I(j6 107 108 109 i010
VOLUME OF PIPE IN CUBIC FEET
COST VS PIPE VOLUME FOR FORCE MAINS USED III
COLLECTOR SEWER SYSTEMS
(COSTS BASED ON FIRM ENGINEERING ESTIMATES AND BID DATA)
-------
108
10?
| 106
_J
8
z 105
10*
103
102-
i-_i
R=0
3
II
98
95
i i
yi.j
V
0
z
- i -
/
/
f -
=?
y
/
/
1
""?'
A
A
+
A
-
1 10 102 103 104 105 106 107 1Q8 109 1010
PIPE VOLUME IN CUBIC FEET
COST VS PIPE VOLUME FOR FORCE MAINS USED IN
INTECEPTOR SEWER SYSTEMS
(COSTS BASED ON FIRM ENGINEERING ESTIMATES AND BID DATA)
-------
CO
oc
O
Q
8
107
106
105
103
102
OU
R=0.724
1
s
10-3 10-2
10"1 10° 101 102 103
PUMPING STATION CAPACITY IN MGD
105
COST YS CAPACITY FOR PUMPING STATIONS USED IN
COLLECTOR SEWER SYSTEMS
(COSTS BASED ON FIRM ENGINEERING ESTIMATES AND BID DATA)
-------
108
107
106
105
104
c/j
cc
to
O
O
103
102
C=2.25xl05Q°-82
R=0.726
10
10~ 10"1 10° 101 102 103
PUMPING STATION CAPACITY IN MOD
105
COST VS CAPACITY FOR PUMPING STATIONS USED IN
INTERCEPTOR SEWER SYSTEMS
(COSTS BASED ON FIRM ENGINEERING ESTIMATES AND BID DATA)
-------
DC
5
o
Q
O
O
10
103
102
SEWER LENGTH IN FT
FIGURE 7. COST VS. LENGTH OF GRAVITY SEWERS
OF VARIOUS DIAMETERS FEBRUARY 10,1977
-------
M
QC
\
O
Q
O
u
108
107
106
in5
m4
m3
in2
JANL
IAR1
: c
76 COS
T
•
,• ,
/ /
'Y/
* / />
-7?
/
-/-?
/
/ /
/
'/
,;;•-'
f
/
'
'
I
-•:••'
-
.
7'
'//
' y
$
'
v
// y
///
/ / / j
' / / /
/ ' / / /
/ '/A
'/,/
\y
^
' / e
/ /
/ A
' ///
f
.
!
•
•
-'
//£
//
//
^
//
. ' • /
< ' ///>
' tJ-jyL
'////
i V
//
^
7/
,
X
•
/ '
y / ^
/'^
/ , .
// ,
w
/,
'A
*? // $
' // /j/
£ / /ff
/y M*
' f r
#
/
JK./
f
'h?i
',
'/d*/
I
^
•
10
102 103 104 10s
PIPE LENGTH IN IT-
FIGURE 8. COST VS. LENGTH OF FORCE MAINS
106
FEBRUARY 10,1977
-------
APPENDIX I
BACKGROUND AND METHODOLOGY USED FOR DATA BASE
The purpose of this Appendix is to present the basic goals,
in terms of accuracy and completeness, used to develop the
methodology employed for the collection of data during the 1976
Needs Survey. The actual form utilized, and the level of
technical input required to complete these forms, are discussed
in Appendix II. Quality control and quality assurance programs
were instituted and are briefly described.
A. Conduct of the Survey
Drawing on the experience of the 1973 and 1974 Surveys, EPA
and the States formed a working group to determine the strategy
for the conduct of the 1976 Survey. Survey goals were identified
by the group to be:
1. That the Survey
needs ,
identify and quantify all eligible
2. That the conduct of the Survey be nationally uniform,
3. That the utilization of scarce State and EPA regional
personnel and dollar resources required for the Survey
be minimized.
The Survey approach
recommendations was:
taken as
result
of
these
1. An independent consultant, paid by EPA, would conduct
the Survey on a facility-by-facility basis for
Categories I-IV. The consultant's personnel were to be
based in EPA regional offices, but would visit State and
local offices as required to formulate cost estimates
and acquire other pertinent information. The
engineering firm of Dames and Moore, headquartered in
Los Angeles, California, and with company resources
sufficient for this large effort, was competitively
selected for this task.
2. Survey guidance was formulated in draft by EPA and was
circulated to all parties involved in the Survey, After
a review period, comments received from the States and
regional EPA staffs were incorporated into the final
guidelines which were subsequently used on a national
basis.
AI-1
-------
3. National uniformity of estimating procedures was a
Survey goal. The cost and construction differences
inherent to various sections of the Country were
recognized and accommodated. To provide the desired
uniformity, all participants of the Survey Team were
required to utilize the same approach. This was
accomplished by training project staff at the beginning
of the Survey. Contractor personnel, one senior
individual to be assigned to each Regional EPA office,
attended a training briefing session at the start of the
project. These individuals, together with EPA staff and
the contractor's senior sanitary engineers, then
conducted orientation meetings in EPA Regional offices
which were attended by representatives of the States.
Logistics, target dates, and individual objections to
the guidelines and procedures were discussed and
resolved. States were asked only to provide as much
investment in personnel for the Survey as they
considered prudent; but were invited to participate
fully in the formal field Survey work.
4. The next step required the contractor to train a staff
in each Region to conduct the actual Survey. Contractor
personnel, located in each Regional office, numbered
fifty engineers and technicians. The actual field work
was started in the early spring of 1976 and was
concluded by mid-fall of 1976.
5. All pertinent information available from previous
Surveys was made available to the contractor on the
basic Survey form (EPA-1). An explanation of this form
can be found in Appendix II. The contractor updated
and/or confirmed these data from sources within EPA's
Regional Offices (1JPDES permit and construction grant
files), fron information supplied by the States, and
from individual treatment and collection authorities at
the local level. Appropriate costs were estimated, as
described in Sections B and C, and the updated or
revised form was submitted to the cognizant State for
review and approval. Provision was made for the State
to make an estimate independent of contractor/EPA
figures if agreement between all parties could not be
reached.
6. After approval of the estimates by the State the form
was reviewed and approved by EPA Regional staff.
Throughout this process the contractor provided quality
control procedures on all forms.
7. The completed forms were forwarded to a central
contractor office where they were each subjected to an
independent Quality Assurance procedure. This was done
both manually and by computer techniques, the latter
being an EPA administered program.
AI-2
-------
B. Survey Guidance
Participant guidance for the Survey was formulated by EPA,
the States, and the consultant, working closely together. This
document included the following subjects:
1. Responsibilities of each participant
2. Target dates for project milestones, including the
calendar for the Survey, the consultant's contractual
obligations, and the States' input and approval
procedures.
3. Descriptions of all data sources to be provided to
participants, to aid in completion of the Survey.
4. Briefing schedules for participants.
5. Provisions for State and Regional review of consultant's
data prior to finalization.
6. Definitions of terras for Needs purposes. Standards were
established for definitions of secondary treatment,
design year, units of measurement, cost estimating,
basis of cost estimate, Survey samples, design flows,
and infiltration/inflow reporting.
7. Specific guidelines for completing Survey forms.
8. Descriptions of EPA adjustments to the 1974 Needs data
base prior to its use as a starting point in 1976.
9. Cost estimating procedures to be used when more reliable
local procedures were not available. These included
estimating procedures for treatment costs and new
sewers, with factors provided for determination of cost
variations in any of twenty-five areas in the vicinity
of major cities in the U.S.
10. Interceptor sewer sizing tables.
As a result of meetings and other comnunications with all of
the States, the guidance was supplemented by request to include:
1. "Rules of Thuab" for estimating costs based on best
engineering judgement. All of the participants
understood that rules of thunb would be used only when
better information was not available. In many cases,
States presented data which caused the rules of thumb to
be modified for local conditions. Examples are:
a. Per capita domestic and commercial flows were not
allowed to exceed 125 gallons per day for treatment
unless the locality could substantiate that such
higher flowu were more cost effective to treat than
to correct.
AI-3
-------
b. Collector and interceptor lengths were United to
twenty feet and one foot per capita, respectively, of
unseuered population. Many local exceptions were
made to this rule, all based upon details of past
experience.
2. A procedure for validation of basis of estimate
designations.
3. Additional cost data showing capital costs on a National
basis for:
a. chlorination facilities
b. pumping stations
c. filtration systems
d, waste stabilization ponds
e. aerated lagoons
4. Procedures for estimating backlog needs for all
Categories. Backlog is defined as the cost of those
facilities needed on January 1, 1976 to meet the needs
of present populations.
5. Instructions for reconciliation of populations.
6. Guidance for estiraation of collector sewer costs.
7. Information on grant eligibilities for land costs.
8. Guidance for estiraation of I/I analysis costs.
C. Basis of Cost
The quality of all cost estimates used in the Survey was
based upon the source documents used for the specific facility.
The ranking of these cost estimates, from high to low, was
determined by EPA to be:
1. Engineer/Consultant Firm Estimate
2. Engineer Consultant Preliminary Estimate
3. Cost-Effeetive Analysis (applicable to I/I only)
4. Cost of Previous Conparable Construction
5. EPA Supplied Cost Estimating Procedures
6. Rough Estimate
AI-4
-------
The quality and completeness of the 1976 Heeds Survey data
is considered to be significantly better than any previous
Survey. A complete analysis of the quality of the cost
information can be found in the Cost Report referred to
previously.
D. Data Sources
1. The types of data needed in the Survey and the sources
used to access this data were many. The major types of
data used were:
a. Population (present and 1990)
b. Total flow (average, current design and projected
1990 design)
c. Industrial flow (average, current design and
projected 1990 design)
d. Biological oxygen demand, influent and effluent,
(average, current design and projected 1990 design)
e. Nitrogen and phosphorus removal requirements
(average, current design and projected 1990 design)
f. Treatment methods
g. Sludge handling treatment and disposal methods
h. Level of treatment required
2. The sources of these data were:
a. 1974 Needs Survey data
b. HPDES applications and permits
c. Grant application files
d. Grant files and Grant Information Control System data
e. Facility and/or Regional Plans (201 and 208 plans)
f. Other engineering plans or reports
g. State Water Quality Standards
AI-5
-------
APPENDIX II
SURVEY FORM
The 1974 form, a 37 page booklet, was revised to one page
for use in the 1976 Survey. The 1974 Data of Record for each
facility included in the 1974 Survey was generated by computer on
the new 1976 Survey form. Once the revised cost estimates were
recorded on Survey forms for each facility, copies of the
completed forms were provided for all parties participating in
the Survey. These forms were then used to record the updated
1976 Heeds Survey figures.
Census data for 1975 and 1990 populations, as modified by
formally granted exceptions, were used as State ceilings; State
population totals were not permitted to exceed these ceilings,
A copy of the Form EPA-1 used for this Survey is shown as
Exhibit A. It can be seen that each form contains a great deal
of data for both treatment plants and sewers. By use of an
elaborate coding system (Exhibit B) not only could all pertinent
physical and cost data be entered for each facility, but such
coding also provides for systematic checking by computer for
accuracy and completeness.
Listed below is a brief explanation of each item in the 1976
Needs Survey form EPA-1. Data of Record were preprinted in the
white portions of the forms; corrections and/or revisions were
entered in the shaded portions.
1. NEEDS SURVEY NUMBER
This is a nine digit number. The first two digits are a
coded number from the Federal Information Processing Standard for
Designating States and Outlying Areas of the United States
(FIPS-5), and designates a particular State. The next four
numbers are assigned sequentially by each State agency. The last
three numbers are assigned by the authority to the facility.
2. FACILITY NAME
The official name of the facility which is legally used to
identify it.
3. AUTHORITY NAME
The official name of the authority which is legally used to
identify it.
4. NPDES NUMBER
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit
number, assigned through the EPA permit program.
AII-1
-------
5. BASIN NUMBER
This four digit number shows the EPA major/minor basin
codes.
6. 245 NUMBER
This thirteen digit number is the Municipal Waste Facility
Inventory number.
7, SAMPLE
If this box is checked, the facility was part of the sample
used by some States for communities of less than 10,000
population outside Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas
(SHSA's).
8. FACILITY LOCATION
The State location is the same two digit FIPS-5 number used
in the authority number. The County location is based on the
FIPS-6 codes. The Place location number is derived from the
"Geographic Identification Place Scheme" developed by the Census
Bureau, and is a four digit number.
9. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT
The number of the Congressional District in which the
facility was located in 1976.
10. SUBMISSION CODE
This is a one digit number which indicates whether the
facility needs have had no change since the 1974 Survey, were not
reported, or have been changed.
11. CITY
The City in which the facility is located.
12. COUNTY
The County in which the facility is located.
13. ZIP CODE
The offical Post Office Zip Code of the facility.
14a. FACILITY STATUS
This shows by a one digit code whether the facility is
currently in operation or not in operation. Facilities not in
operation nre usually either currently proposed or under
cons truct ion.
AII-2
-------
b. NATURE OF FACILITY
This is a one digit code which stands for the type of
facility.
c. CONSTRUCTION GRANT STATUS
This one digit code shows if there is a construction grant
approved or pending, or if there are no applicable grants.
d. PROJECTED CHANGE
This one digit code shows projected physical changes for the
faciltiy, i.e., if the facility will be enlarged, upgraded,
replaced, abandoned, etc.
e. ABANDONMENT DATE
The appropriate date is filled in only if the facility will
be abandoned.
15. SUMMARY OF CATEGORY NEEDS
This section is used to record the costs for Categories
I-IVB. Column (a) is for the EPA assessment, column (b) is for
the State estimate, and column (c) is the portion required to
satisfy "backlog" facility requirements. "Backlog" refers to
facility requirements that . are established on the basis of
current rather than 1990 population. The basis of estimate in
the last column is a one digit code which specifies the basis of
the cost estimation.
16. FACILITY POPULATION
This section shows the population which receives treatment
and/or collection from the facility. Both are broken down by
present resident population, present non-resident population,
projected resident population, projected non-resident population.
17. HEED FOR HEW COLLECTORS, INTERCEPTORS, FORCE MAINS, AND
PUMPING STATIONS
This section lists codes for new collectors, interceptors,
force mains, and pumping stations, and their costs. The diameter
of pipe is in inches, the length in feet, and the capacity is in
millions of gallons per day (MOD). These have been converted in
the technical summaries to metric units.
13. DISPOSAL OF LIQUID EFFLUENTS
"Disp," "Use," and "Chng" are all one digit codes indicating
the type of disposal, whether the facility is now in use, under
construction, etc., and whether or not there will be a physical
change, i.e., enlarge, upgrade, etc.
AII-3
-------
19. REQUIRED INFILTRATION/INFLOW CORRECTIVE ACTION
"Code" is a one digit number showing the type of corrective
action. "Basis" stands for the Basis of Estimate, referred to
previously.
20. ESTIMATED INFILTRATIOH/INFLOW COMPONENT
This number is the total flow component (HGD) due to
infiltration/inflow.
21. MAJOR REHABILITATION/REPLACEMENT REQUIRED
"Code" is a one digit code standing for type of corrective
action. "Basis" is the Basis of Estimate.
22. DO WASTEIJATERS ORIGINATE IN COMMUNITIES EXISTING BEFORE
OCTOBER 18, 1972?
This is self-explanatory and is answered by a "yes" or "no."
23. 1972 COLLECTION POPULATION
This figure is the actual 1972 population requiring new
collector sewers.
24. FLOWS, CONCENTRATION, AIIIJ REMOVAL RATES
This section iS for monthly average flow or concentration
figures in terns of the existing rate, the present design rate,
and projected design rate for the following Categories:
1. total flow in million gallons per day (MGD)
2. total industrial flow in million gallons per day (IICD)
3. domestic flow per capita in gallons per capita per day
(gpcd)
Below these figures, influent and effluent concentrations
are shown for five-day Biological Oxygen Demand (milligrams per
liter), suspended solids (milligrams per liter), phosphorus
(milligrams per liter), total kjeldehl nitrogen (milligrams per
liter), total nitrogen (milligrams per liter), and any others.
25. DOES DISCHARGE MEET SECONDARY?
Whether or not the discharge currently meets secondary
treatment standards is answered by a "yes" or "no."
AII-4
-------
26. WILL DISCHAUCE IIEKT SECONDARY BY JULY 1, 1977?
Whether or not the discharge will meet secondary treatment
by July 1, 1977 is answered by a "yes" or "no."
27. IS REQUIRED TREATMENT LEVEL MORE STRIilGENT THAN SECONDARY?
28. REASON:
Whether or not the required treatment level is more
stringent than secondary treatment standards is ansv/ered by a
"yes" or "no." If yes, a one digit code is entered in Number 28,
Reasons.
29. TREATIIENT AND SLUDGE HANDLING
There arc three columns in this section. The first column
is for type of treatment and sludjje handling (unit process), the
second column is for the current use, and the third column slvows
projected change.
AII-5
-------
EPA.I
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
ESTIMATE Of MUNICIPAL WASTEKATER TREATMENT FACILITY REQUIREMENTS
jettons
-------
Ita. N . leb.lo.lo. Cede
- Ho ehenie Iran 1*74
- Facility MI reported In 1974
- Chonie friai 1)74
-tnepWeilooi
- NIC In cniretlan
Hje» I4b - Netaro •( FoallHr
I-A
CODE REFERENCE CHART
IN.. IW. in _d lib . I..I. ^ I,
I - StMa conlfleotloo
2 - Anilylli cw>l«od
- Evaluation aurvay complaud
- En|lnaaf/cona.
which oltto dltdio>to wl*«M »mi»mi ot «od«»|o
to . fMllltr comnllod by o dlfteon ouAvllr. Do ool
Includo COMbliMd sowori or cum MWOTI.)
I - A ttpoHH confelrwd itw«r ixiun. (Ineludoi oni »r
Mr* ImorconnicHd itwofs which cany bath unitary
wuttwKon and atam wmra, and which olftot *«diari.
wdkout nmant or to • fKlllty OM>aad hy andw
audnrlty. If roclllty lacliidn both toporou aanlwy
" •'
-HaawlkaMoirania
Iw.. l«, III, «id Iti - Pttiomd Orann
lta.17.-
Ci - Cal'actar a*wara
II - Innrcwtor lowora
PM-FinaMaln
fl. Punialni Station
ImnlUondWb-UaoCodoi
- Undar constnicllwi ar provldad for in approved frant
- Roqul rod, but not yat approvod or fundod
IU. Ih - Dltpoul ol LI*rU Effi»ri.
- Outfall to lurfiea xouri
- Ocoon outfall
- Holdlruj fond
C~^«"y. An
lie. II - lloo.ni h. Tro
• - A wotor quellty plen which boa boon approvo* by EPA
I - Order of Stole Court
2 - Order of Federal Court
3 - Stele permit or llcenu
4 - IIPOES OOT.II er llcenu
$ - Stete enforcement ardor er preceodihf
4 - Foderol enforcement'order or procoodlni
7 - Voluntery otroemont which Includu 0 tchodulo of com-
pliance or Improvemente
l-Other
» - A ceniflcetlon by trie Stole Ulet the body of wotor re-
caivlni tJili dlidtorie la water quality dependent, end
rjiatmora itrlniantlroeunentll neededte iMotPederelly-
appravod woter auellty aiandprdl for dleaelved oxyten
and
- lnaul< In no
- Ground wotor mchir|0
- Olhor lond ditpoaal
- Kocycllni and rouao
- tootle tonk flaM
IM 1»A (I/I) ood bM tlA fthroi lobab.)
. Ifn known « All Ho*
- Sol off Mwor llnoa
- FUptaco/roUno tawor aoctlont
- Cnan«VcroMO flow routirii ayatam
- Pn>Ml flow awmiuUon
Im »a - Troonaool ool Slodfe Naodllnq
11 - PrelMnery Menem
01-Puawlne
03 - PrliMry aodloHHitotlon
04 - TrlcMIni filter
OS - Activated aludia
Ot - Fllntlon
17 - Actlveiod carbon
00 - Two ataie tertiary lima
01 . Bleloilcel nitrification
10 - Blelofleel denltrlflcailen
II - Ion oachento
» - Breakpoint ihlerlnetlon
11 - Amannle atrlpplni
14 - Olalnfeetlon
II - Lend tnenont of effluent
U - CMoellon pood.
17 - fMior mormini
» . Anaerobic dlleetfon
31 - Hut moment
lI.AI,eVyln(
39 - Oeweterlng
U.laclnawlon
3S - Kacoklnetlon
X- Land fill
17 - Lend aproedlni of iludto
10 - Oceon diulwlni
M - Other lludfe hendllnt
* U.S. Government Printing Office: 1977-778-742/154 Regions
------- | |