^xMRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
URVEr.LANCE AND ANALYST' DIVISION
[REGION X-PACIFIC NORTHWEST & ALASKAI
1200 SIXTH AVENUE, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
-------
Kodachrome
SLiDE
Kodachrome
Kodachrome
SLIDE
Kodachrome
SLIDE
PROCESS!-'. I
,--Kodachrome
j^>
PRCCFi, i. 1.1 ":k *
-------
WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
BEAR RIVER BASIN
SURVEILLANCE AND ANALYSIS DIVISION
'. ?fl(2.-%-102-
-------
BEAR RIVER HAS
e
urveniance @ Analysis Olv
wlronm«ntal Wrote
1200 6th Av«nu«
. Waslflngton
-------
1/13
REGION 10 WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
A logical step-by-step approach is needed to identify and abate nonpoint
sources of pollution within Region 10. The first step must be to assess the
magnitude and extent of the nonpoint source problem.
Region 10 has developed a water quality assessment approach which will
assist EPA planners, land agencies, and state and local agencies in identifying
probable nonpoint sources and determining their effects upon the "fishable-
swimmable" aspect of Regional streams.
Generally the approach is to determine the biological, recreational, and
water quality status of Regional streams and to display each status on color
coded STORET basin maps. This information is to be related to land use and
land ownership (also on basin maps) as well as other factors such as hydro-
modifications, river flows, mining activities, and point source discharges.
All this information is then systematically organized on a summary table
which can be easily used.
This package contains information for one river basin within Region 10.
The package consists of the following:
1. Five slides of the maps used in the evaluation of the basin.
2. A flow chart showing the phased assessment procedure.
3. A summary table for the basin and a detailed description of
information on the table.
4. A basin point source discharge listing by segment number.
5. Specific information for biological and recreational status.
The STORET basin map is used as the base map for all status evaluations.
Each map is overlayed by a transparency that contains segment basin boundaries
representing drainage areas associated with segments defined by each state
within the Region. These segment boundaries are used as the basis for
assessing water and land Information.
-------
2/13
Biological status information is obtained from field biologists represent-
ing state and federal fish and game agencies. Their judgment is based upon a
set of criteria shown on Table 1. The biological status map (slide //I) shows
the results of this assessment.
Recreational status (slide #2) is obtained from field biologists, fish-
ermen, swimmers, and recreational specialists utilizing the criteria identi-
fied in the Table Explanation.
Slide #3 shows the water quality station locations in each segment.
STORE! was used as a basis for all water quality data since most state and
federal agencies and many local agencies and universities store data in Region
10. The number associated with each point on the map references a STORET
printout page number. Data was retrieved utilizing the STORET standards
flagging program with EFA's Water Quality Criteria as the threshold levels.
Selected water quality threshold and violation screening criteria are shown
and defined in the Table Explanation.
Slides /M and //5 show land use and land ownership throughout the STORET
basin. The source of this information is from land management agencies.
All the information previously discussed and shown on maps is summarized
on the River Basin tables. Information on these tables is arranged by segment
in an upstream to downstream order beginning at the upper end of each STORET
basin.
The information obtained and compiled using this procedure is general;
however, it indicates probable cause and effect relationships related to land
use and land ownership. The backup information on field tables, STORET print-
outs and maps allows the user to make more detailed evaluations. Specific
information gathering investigations in problem areas would be necessary for
an accurate "cause and effect" picture.
-------
3/13
This evaluation process is still evolving and is continually being im-
proved based on field verifications and comments from users. If you have
specific questions on the procedures used in these evaluations, please
contact Bill Schmidt, Chief, Water Surveillance and Investigation Section,
Surveillance and Analysis Division, Region 10 (Telephone—FTS 399-1210).
-------
4/13
REGION JO WATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT
Present Water Quality Assessment
Effect of land use upon the Biological, Recreational, and Water
Quality of Regional streams
STORE" Kivrr linn In Approach
•-—7
•3
*J
u
ft
&
1
V
y
<
e
•4
(0
£
ft)
JS
w
£
»
•j
1
£
3
•H
•H
u
c
u
n
4J
3
O.
01
tf
1
a.
2) Reiterative process until all basins are cooplcte
3) Land use and ownership plotted on base nap
V
• 1)
2)
*
Stream Segment Identification
1) Drainage basin associated with segment
2) Segments identified by States (further
breakdown may be necessary)
*
Phase I Segnent Information
1) Segment length 4) Mining
2) Hydrologic data 5) llydronodlflcatlon
3) Point Sources
+
Phaua II Biological Status
1) Develop criteria
2) Contact field biologists for status
3) Develop backup table and color coded maps
- +
Phase III Recreational Status
1) Develop criteria (contact & noncontact)
2) Contact water users, recreation agencies.
etc.
3) Develop backup table and color coded naps
*
Phase IV Water Quality Status
1) Select screening parameters
2) Select Federal criteria & data adequacy
criteria
3) STORET retrieval using Standards Flagging
Program
4) Develop station distribution map & bazcup
violation printouts
+
Phase V Land Ufia & Ownership Status
1) Determine Z use and ownership considering
grazing, silviculture, agriculture, urban
uses and Federal, State, Indian, and pri-
vate ^.ands
*
STORET River Basin Summary Table
j
Including all data from segments (Phases I thru V)
Table to be used in decision ranking process
Field Verification of Phases II thru V
Areas to be selected on a random baala
Region and State Decision Making Process
Information fron this process may he used for the following:
1) Data needs Identification
2) Prioritize nor), arean and programs by baain. State, land
use, ownership, etc.
3) U.Q. standards review
4) Assess waters presently meeting 1913 goals of "fishable swlm-
moble"
5) Determine effect of and/or needs for hydromodlfIcatlon
6) Assess the "cause and effect" relationships of various land
uses and therefore BMFs.
7) Assist Federal, State, and private agencies in Identifying
problems
8) Base study to support future abatement program success assess-
ment
I
u
•H
8
•H
S
&
a
s
.0
2
•H
a
4J
O
o
a
-------
The field hiolopist utilizes the following evaluation matrix in determining scream eeor»ent status classification.
BIOLOGICAL. EVALUATION CRITERIA
TABLE I
^~~"~"- — ^^TIME & SEVERITY
:RITERIA FOR^~~- — ^FACTORS
3IOLOGICAL EVALUATION-----^
1. Destruction of ha'eitat for
indigenous specias - passage,
spawning, rearing.
II. Interuption of tola! food chain
III. Interference with tho woll
being of indigenous species of
fish or food chain organism*.
Duration of Adverse Condition
NEVT.R-INTERMITTENT-oo>:TT}n'oij.c
*ed
*g**^p^^^r*^^^H^^^HBBBD^^mgini^um.^^^jc^^Lajlu^4ji
Severity of Adverse Condition
LOW HIGH
Blue •• • •
VaT Imj
••• Red
Period of Biological Activity
NO!:-CTrricAL Cranc.c,
Blue/vellow
Yellow
Ket
Red
Xed
•Red
NOTE: The color-code (blue, yellow, and red) is used on the maps (see slides).
On the summary tables, a pattern-code was used to allow for easier duplication.
Therefore: Blue corresponds to: !?>X*l'
Yellow corresponds to:
Red corresponds to:
5/13
-------
TABLE EXPLANATION
River:
Segment Number:
1. Sub-basin Information
Sub-basin: Each "STORET" major river basin is divided into minor river basins based on major
tributaries to the main stream. Each sub-basin is further subdivided into segments,
In the table the segments and sub-basins appear in an upstream to downstream order.
The major river or stream and its tributaries in the segment being classified
are listed.
The reach of the river under consideration, including the hydrologic drainage
area that contributes flow to that reach, is designated by number for the pur-
poses of identification and cross-referencing. This number will generally be
the state assigned alpha-numeric code except where a finer division is necessary
in giving a more accurate description of the area.
The area of the entire segment being described is given in square miles.
Annual average, maximum, and minimum discharge (in cfs) are given for the major
stream or reach in each segment where USGS flow records are available.
The upper and lower river miles of the stream or reach in each segment as well
as the river mile of the confluence with the next lowest order stream is given.
For instance, the Powder River (length 145 miles), which enters the Snake River
at river mile 296, is described under "R.ll. Range" as:
296/
145-0
Segment Length: The length, in miles, of the reach of the major stream in each segment is given.
2. Environmental Information
Drainage Area:
Flow:
River Mile Range:
Significant Discharger:
The number of significant dischargers, as determined by EPA S&A Region X, is
noted under the appropriate column, being either Municipal (M) or Industrial (I),
6/13
-------
Hydro-modification:
Mining:
Water Use:
Biological Status:
Agricultural (irrigation diversions or returns), reservoirs, channel realign-
ment, or other changes in the natural flow of the stream under consideration
are identified.
I = Agricultural Modifications
R = Reservoir Modification (Number of reservoirs having a total capacity of
5,000 acre-feet or more)
C = Channel Realignment, Revetments, etc.
0 = Other
Where specific data is available, the numerical extent of the hydromodification
is noted as a number after the letter abbreviation. Where numerical information
is lacking, a qualitative notation of extent is used. A '+' means there is
extensive modification of that type in the segment, no symbol after the letter
means it is present, and no letter means its presence is at most negligible.
Present or active (A) mining operations and past or non-active (N) mining opera-
tions are identified for each segment.
A general description of the present water uses in the segment is given. Pwr -
power; Rec - recreation; Ag - agriculture; F+W - fish and wildlife; Mun - muni-
cipal; M+I - municipal and industrial; Ind - industrial; Nav - navigation.
This is a qualitative assessment of biological conditions in the streams of that
particular segment.
Solid Black - (corresponds to red on map) - water environment is unsuitable for
a healthy biological community.
Diagonal Stripes - (yellow on map) - a questionable or intermittedly unhealthy
environment exists.
Dots - (blue on map) - a good environment exists for the biota.
Blank Space - (green on map) - insufficient data is available for evaluation.
Determination of the biological status was carried out by experienced, knowledg-
able biologists associated with various federal and state agencies who are
familiar with the streams in the river segments. Table 1 outlines the criteria
used for the biological evaluations. Evaluations are limited to major streams.
In general, these include first through second or third order streams for rivers
near the seacoast and first through fourth order for inland streams. A certain
amount of subjective judgment has been used, however, as to whether to include
7/13
-------
Biological Status
(cont):
Recreational Status:
Water Quality Status
(Parametric Coverage):
certain higher order streams. Whether a certain higher order stream falls within
the just mentioned bounds is not in itself justification for inclusion. Its size
and significance arc also taken into account.
This is the qualitative assessment of water related recreational use for each
segment. The criteria used for evaluation of recreational status was based on
typical year-round use. Two major categories were considered: (1) contact
recreation (swimming), and (2) non-contact recreation (boating, fishing, and
aesthetics).
Dots - (corresponds to blue on map) - popular areas, few complaints registered,
wide diversity of socio-economic uses in evidence.
Diagonal Stripes - (yellow on map) - part-time use due to water management, sea-
sonal water quality and quantity conditions, seasonal accessibility, etc.
Solid Black - (red on map) - no use in areas where that use should normally exist.
Blank Space - (green on map) - insufficient data for evaluation.
The stream order criteria for inclusion in the evaluation are the same as for
biological status.
An assessment of the water quality data available in each of the segments is given.
All data used in the analysis and evaluation is available in EPA's "STORE!" System.
A group of twelve basic parameters is used in assessing the water quality in each
segment.
Parameter
Temperature (T)
Dissolved Oxygen
(DO)
Criteria
Threshold Level/Units
20°C (68°F) MAX
6 mg/1 MIN
90% SAT MIN
Environmental Impact and Reference
To protect growth and migration routes of salmonids
(Federal Water Pollution Control Administration (FWPCA.) ,
Water Quality Criteria, 1968).
For good growth and the general well-being of trout,
salmon, and other species of cold water biota, DO con-
centrations should not be below- 6 mg/1 (FWPCA, Water
Quality Criteria, 1968). In addition, state water
quality standards normally require 90% saturation for
dissolved oxygen (Idaho and Oregon).
8/13
-------
Parameter
Dissolved Gas (TDG)
Criteria
Threshold Level/Units
110% SAT MAX
pH (pH)
6.5 MIN
8.5 MAX
Turbidity (Turb)
25 JTU MAX
Environmental Impact and Reference
To prevent fish fatalities by "gas bubble disease" in
which dissolved gases in their circulatory system come
out of solution to form bubbles (emboli) which block
the flow of blood through the capillary vessels (Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency, Quality Criteria for
Water. 1976).
The pH range which is not directly lethal to fish is
5-9. However, the toxicity of several common pollu-
tants is markedly affected by pH changes within this
range, and increasing acidity or alkalinity may make
these poisons more toxic. Therefore, a pH range of
6.5 to 9.0 is desirable to protect freshwater aquatic
life (EPA, Quality Criteria for Water, 1976). In pri-
mary contact recreation waters, the pH should be within
the range of 6.5-8.3 except when due to natural causes
to prevent the possibilities of eye irritations in
humans (FWPCA, Water Quality Criteria, 1968). State
pH standards range from 6.5 to 9.0 for Idaho and 6.5
to 8.5 for Oregon and Washington. In light of the
above information, our criteria have been set at 6.5
to 8.5.
Host state standards have a turbidity standard of "not
to exceed 5 JTU over background or natural conditions".
It is, however, rather ambiguous what "background or
natural conditions" are. Also, this type of standard
does not relate to the fishable/swimmable concept.
Excessive turbidity reduces photosynthesis by aquatic
plant life and damages the spawning grounds of fish and
habitat of aquatic invertebrates. It has been observed
that maximum production in hatchery ponds and reservoirs
occurred where the average turbidity was less than 25
JTU (Buck, D.H., 1956. Effects of turbidity on fish
and fishing. In: 21st North Amer. Wildlife Conf. Trans.).
9/13
-------
Parameter
Criteria
Threshold Level/Units
Environmental Impact and Reference
Phosphorus (Phos)
Total 0.05 mg/l-P
Total 0.15 mg/l-PO^
Ortho 0.025 mg/l-P
Ortho 0.075 mg/l-PO,
Diss. Ortho 0.01 mg/l-P
Nitrate Nitrogen
(N)
0.30 mg/l-N
1.33 mg/l-N03
Ammonia Nitrogen
(NH3)
Un-ionized 0.02 mg/l-N
Total 0.20 mg/l-N
Total 0.26 mg/1-NH/i
Limited studies made to date indicate that different
species of algae have somewhat different phosphorus
requirements with the range of available phosphorus
usually falling between 0.01 and 0.05 mg/1 as P. At
these levels, when other conditions are favorable,
blooms may be expected. While there is no set rela-
tionship between total and available phosphorus (be-
cause the ratio varies with season, temperature, and
plant growth), the total phosphorus is governing as it
is the reservoir that supplies the available phosphorus.
A desirable guideline for total phosphorus is 0.05 mg/1
as P where streams enter lakes or reservoirs (FWPCA,
Water Quality Criteria, 1968). The other criteria
levels for different units and forms of phosphorus
have been determined by unit conversion and relation-
ships found between the phosphorus forms in Region 10.
The other forms of phosphorus are used as indicators
only when data for total phosphorus is lacking.
Mackenthun cited results indicating that inorganic
nitrogen at 0.30 mg/1 and inorganic phosphorus at
0.01 mg/1, at the start of an active growing season,
subsequently permitted algal blooms (Mackenthun, K.M.,
1965. Nitrogen and phosphorus in water. U.S. Depart-
ment of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health
Service.).
The amount of un-ionized ammonia is very much dependent
upon pH, temperature, and concentration of total ammonia.
A maximum level of 0.02 mg/1 as un-ionized ammonia is
recommended to minimize toxicity to freshwater aquatic
life (EPA, Quality Criteria for Water, 1976). Concen-
trations of total ammonia above 0.20 mg/1 as N are indi-
cative of organic pollution (Klein, River Pollution 1.,
Chemical Analysis, 1959).
10/13
-------
Parameter
Bacteria (Bact)
Dissolved Solids
Conductivity
(Cond)
Pesticide Toxicity
(OTOX)
Aldrin
Dieldrin
Chlordane
DDT
Endrin
Heptachlor
Lindane
Malathion
Parathion
Criteria
Threshold Level/Units
Total Coliform 1000/100 ml
Fecal Coliform 240/100 ml
TDS 500 mg/1
Cond. 750 umho/cm
.003 ug/1
.003 ug/1
.010 ug/1
.001 ug/1
.004 ug/1
.001 ug/1
.019 ug/1
.100 ug/1
.040 ug/1
Environmental Impact and Reference
Total and fecal coliform are microbiological indicators
used to determine or indicate the safety of water for
drinking, swimming, and shellfish harvesting. A fecal
coliform log mean of 200 per 100 ml for bathing waters
and 14 per 100 ml for shellfish harvesting waters is
recommended by Quality Criteria for Water, EPA, 1976.
State standards range from 240 total/50 fecal per 100
ml for primary contact recreation in Idaho, 1000 total
per 100 ml in Oregon for general beneficial use, and
1000 total per 100 ml in Washington for Class B general
recreation. From the above discussion, the suggested
criteria level based on general recreation is 1000 per
100 ml for total coliform and 240 per 100 ml for fecal
coliform.
High levels of dissolved solids are a hazard for irri-
gation water. A maximum level of 500 mg/1 is indicated
for water from which no detrimental effects will usu-
ally be noticed. For domestic water supply, the maxi-
mum level is 250 mg/1 (EPA, Quality Criteria for Water,
1976). A relationship exists betweeen dissolved solids
and conductivity where total dissolved solids = .6 to
.8 times the conductivity.
The Following criteria levels are recommended to protect
the freshwater aquatic life (EPA, Quality Criteria for
Water, 1976).
11/13
-------
Heavy Metals (Met)
Metal
Boron
Criteria
Threshold Level
750 ug/1
Cadmium
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
3 ug/1
50 ug/1
20 ug/1
30 ug/1
0.2 ug/1
Zinc
80 ug/1
Environmental Impact
For long term irrigation, a maximum level of 750 ug/1
is recommended for sensitive crops
Harmful to eggs and larvae of salmon in hard water
Mixed aquatic populations protected
96 hour TL5Q to Chinook salmon in soft water was
31 ug/1 at hatch and 18 ug/1 at 1 month old
Aquatic life protected
Selected species of fish and predatory aquatic
organisms protected
Algalcidal concentration for Selenastrum Capriconutum
Reference
2
1
1
2
1
1
References:
1. EPA R3.73.033, Ecological Research Series. Water Quality Criteria 1972.
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1973.
2. EPA, Quality Criteria for Water. 1976.
3. Green, et. al., Report to Region X on the Results of the Spokane River
Algal Assays. 1973.
12/13
-------
The environmental status per each parameter per segment is found by determining the percentage of samples
that are in violation of the particular threshold level. This percentage is then weighted according to
the annual sample size for each segment as follows:
Status Code Class Percent Violations
Number of Samples/Year/Segment/Parameter
More than 20 11 to 20 4 to 10
Solid Black Not Acceptable 51-100% Viol. 61-100% Viol. 71-100% Viol.
Diagonal Stripes Objectionable 11-50% 21-60% 31-70%
Dots Acceptable 0-10% 0-20% 0-30%
No code at all (blank space) indicates insufficient data for evaluation.
The data used for this evaluation is for the period beginning January 1, 1970 until the date of the report.
For each station, parameters with less than 4 samples per year are not used.
Water Quality Status (Station/Data Statistics)
Number of Stations - Actual number of stations within each segment that had at least one parameter
with 4 or more samples per year.
Number of Samples/Parameter - Number of samples per year for each parameter averaged for all
parameters sampled.
Data Adequacy - This determination was made by evaluating the distribution of stations, amount of
data, and in some cases adequacy of parametric coverage versus known environmental quality problems.
+ denotes adequate data
- denotes indadequate data
3. % Land Ownership
The figure in each column represents the percentage of total area within each segment under the
jurisdiction of the noted groups.
4. % Land Use
The figure in each column represents the percentage of total area within each segment that is used for
the various purposes listed.
13/13
-------
RIVER BASIN
V. Land
Dwnershc
Sub-basin Inform
Environmental Information
Land Use
BEAR R?
THOMAS
FK.tf
Wyo. to
Bear L.
conf.
285.0-
238.9
Ag Mun
Pwr
Rec
F+W
23S.9/
Utah
border
-n
tribs
to Bear R
BEAR R.
Bear L.
conf to
oda Sp
238.9-
206.2
BEAR R.
oda Sp
to Onei
-da Dam
206.2-
147.0
-------
J2/2
BEAR RIVER BASIN NOVEMBER YEAR - 1976
Sub-basin Information
Sub — basin
River
BEAR R.
Jneida
Jam to
Ut.bord
MALAD R
LITTLE
MALAD R
src. to
Ut.borc
DEEP CF
source
to Utah
border
S.g tf
0
CQ
CO
t— 4
CQ
CO
O
CO
CQ
CO
Dram
A,.o
O
i-H
VO
0
CVJ
ID
O
CVJ
cfs
Flow
xlO'
1.2
2.0
.17
.09
.39
.03
.014
.1
.nm
R M Range
151.1-
125.3
S«g
.engl
26
20
40
Environmental Information
.c
V
S
Q
at
in
M
1
1
-o
0
E
o
2R
I
•j
1R
I
1R
I
u
9
e
¥
Wolor Ute
ftg
M+I
Rec
F+W
WATER QUALITY
KUiJl^accepiabie
RSSSSSl ^objectionable
1
|.:o T p ;•;•;• JM R^S
Rec Hj
F+W ••
Ag
Rec
F+W
I
.j.;
»***
1 TDG 1 UKI K«»"
I pH
[Turb
1 Phoi
T
DO
TDG
pH
Turb
Phoi
[•Til
EH
ITDG
LH_
1 Turb
[Phoi
T
DO
TDG
pH
Turb
T
DO
tjIJTDG
IpH
Turb
| Phoi
T
DO
TDG
pH
Turb
Phoi
T
DO
TDG
pH
Turb
Phoi
T
DO
TDG
pH
Turb
KSg
^^
:•:•:•:•
|Mct
Cond
lOTo*
|N
NH3
Bict
Met
Cond
OTo*
N
NH3
^^
^^
Bict
Met
OToT^^
N
NH3
But
Met
Cond
N
NH3
Bact
Met
Cond
OTo«
N
NH3
Bid
Met
Cond
OTox
N
NH3
Bid
Met
Cond
OTo,
N
NH3
Bid
Mec
Cond
OTo.
o
X
19
1
0
&
in
67
6
Daio
Adequacy
*
-
-
*/• Land
Owners hi
1,1
in
38
29
9
c
oa
1
25
58
s
-5
c
i
1
4
5
Private
60
42
?8
?i Land Use
j
w
40
35
23
V
Ot
j
33
53
73
1
24
12
4
1
3
Wetland
e
0
*P
j
*
•0
o
c
«A
-------
T »...—
— a.
** U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGtNCV **
** REQION X **
**• SURVEILLANCE AND ANALVSIS DIVISION **
1/4
CFtRIBOU TROUT
= BEAR LAKE
888 48
LOCATION - SODA SPRINGS
STATE = ID
CNTV CODE= 029
DIST OFF =
FAC TVPE - I
SIC CODE = 098
NOTES
(iIVEM LII4S APPLV TO NON-CLEAN ING EFFLUENT CLEANING EFFLUENT
UNTIL 760638 SETT SOLIDS INST MAX-=2 2ML/L-1 GRB UK FROM 768701
SUSP SOLS 10MG/L—110 GRABS AND SEIT SOLS 8 2MLXLWKLV GRBS ALL
FLOWS MONfHLV 24 HK TOTHL "QUARTERLY" IS CODE FOR 2/QTR
MAJOR BASIN
MINOR BASIN
1ST LEVEL MILE= 175 0B
2ND LEVEL MILE"
3RD LEVEL MILE=
PERMIT EXPIRES^
THIS INDUSTRY IS LOCATED IN SEGMENT BB-ZO
DATE RAHbE
*4ii|r*i|ei|i*.
75/06/02 10
7C/07/01 10
KECIEVING UATER= BIG SPRINGS CREEK
LflT- 42-38-48 LONG= 111-36-24
TRT CODE- POP EQ=
PARAMETER DESCRIPTION
SETTLEABLE SOLIDS ML/L
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DOV
SETTLEHBLE SOLIDS ML/L
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MGXL
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DAV
MINIMUM AVERAGE MAXIMUM
8 20
2600 338O
EXC
TYPE FRED
1/3I1TH
1/3MTH
GRAB
COUP
8 10
2288
15 8
2860
COUP 1/MTH
GRAB 1/3MTH
COMP 1/MfH
DAI A SOURCE
PERMIT CONt>
PEMMI f COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
-------
** U S ENVIRONMENTS PROTECTION RGENCV **
** REGION X *»
** SURVEILLANCE RND RNRLVSIS DIVISION **
R-ERI1IT CONDI T I OMS
2/4
i o—
soon
LOCRTION = SODH SPRINGS
STRTt = ID
CNTV CODE- 829
DIST OFF =
t-RC TVPE = 11
SIC CODE =
HOTES
RESIDURL CHLORINt TO BE MONITORED BV DRILV GRABS
MRJOR BRSIN = BERR LRKE
MINOR BRSIN
1ST LEVEL MILE' 174 88
2ND LEVtL I1ILE=
3RD LEVEL MILE*=
PERMIT EXPIRES- 79/03X31
THIS MUNICIPALITY IS LOCATED IN SEGMENT BB-20
F» jr
DRTE RRUGE
x-*
TO
IP
RECIEVING MHTEK^ BERR RIVER
t_m= 42-38-08 LONQ= 111-37-88
TMT COOE-= RS POP EQ=
PRRRMETEK DESCRIPTION
PH
BOD MQ/L
FECRL COL I FORM PER 1OOML
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MG^L
FLOW MGD
BOD LBSXDRV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DflV
PH
BOD IKiXL
FECRL COL I FORM PER 1OOML
SUSPENDED SOLIDS MGXL
FLOW 11GD
BOD LBSXDflV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DRV
MINIMUM
6 08
6 00
'ERRGE
•in**** «
85 El
700
72 8
1 888
673
578
30 0
288
38 8
1 008
288
200
MRXIMUM EXC TVfE
ad****** nmmt ****
9 00 GRRB
COMP
GRRB
COMP
REC
COMP
COMP
9 08 GRRB
COMP
GRRB
COMH
REC
COM*'
COMP
FREQ
******
DRILV
1/MhEK
i/WEEK
1/Wfc.EK
CONT
1/UEEK
1/UlttK
DRILV
l/'WEtK
1/UEEK
1/WttK
CONT
1XWEEK
1/WkEK
DRTH SOURCE
i|i4i4ta|i]|t4cM
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PEKItIT
PERMIT
K**+*
corto
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
LOND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
-------
** U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION RGtNCV »H
** REGION X *f
** SURVEILLANCE FIND RNRLVSIS DIVISION **
COISJO I T I OIMS
9 — &
BERR LRKt
LOCATION - SODfl SPRINGS
STRTE = ID
CNTV CODE" 029
DIST OFF =
FflC TVPE •= I
SIC CODE = 2819
MOTES
SANITftRV UASTE OPTIONS GO INTO EFFECT 751081 < SEE PERMIT)
FOK RLTEkNflflVE PHOSPHOROUS DUMPING POSSIBILITIES, SEE PERMIT
SEC S2B INIRKE MbLL WHTER TO BE MONITORED FOR PHOSPHOROUS MG/L
UEbKLV COMPS
MRJOR BflSIN
MINOR BRSIN
1ST LEVEL MILE= 174 28
2ND LEVEL MILE= 903 10
3RD LEVEL MILE=
PERMIT EXPIRES^ 77/06/30
3/4
THIS INDUSTRY IS LOCATED IN SEGMENT BB-20
DRTE RflNOE
i|iW>Kil(ilci|ti
TU
TO
RECIEVING WRTtk= SODR CREEK
LRT- 42-40-28 LONG- 111-35-33
TRT CODE- POP EQ=
PRRRMEIER DESCRIPTION
MINIMUM RVERRGE MRXIMUM
EXC
PH
FLOU MOD
TkMPLRRTURE FRHRENHEIT DEG-F
r LOUR IDE LBS/DRV
1O1AL PHOSPHOROUS P-LBS/DRV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DRV
PH
FLUORIDE MG/L
hLOU I1GD
TtMPERRTURE FRHRENHEIT DEG-F
FLOUR IDE LBS/DRV
TOTAL PHOSPHOROUS P-LBS/DRV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DRV
6 SO
6 30
2 £70
24 0
176 0
359
2 670
20 0
359
9 00
3 t)39
70 0
72 0
277 0
718
9 00
2 00
3 830
70 0
40 0
245 0
718
TVPE
»*»*
GRAB
REC
GRRB
COMP
COI1P
COItP
GRRB
COMP
RbC
GRRB
COMP
COMP
COMP
FREQ
WVWViliO
DfllLV
CONT
DRILV
1/11 1 H
DRILV
1/ITTH
DRILV
1/MIH
CON1
DRILV
1/MTH
DfllLV
1/MTH
DRTR SOURCE
*nH:ltHiHii»M
PERMIT
PEKMI1
PERMIT
PEkMI 1
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PERMIT
PEKMIT
PERMIT
PERhll
KHfJ*J».fc
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
COND
-------
** u s ENVIRONMENT™. PROTECTION HGENCV **
** REGION x **
** SURVEILLANCE AND RNflLVSIS DIVISION **
PERMIT CONDITIONS
DEL- I1ONTE
CJN < PI—F-lNT
4/4
LOCATION - FRANKLIN
STHTE = ID
CNTV CODE*- 041
DIST OFH -
FRC TVPE = I
SIC CODE - 2033
NOTES
GIVEN LI US VRLID EXEPT DURING SAUERKRAUT SERSON FOR RLL PROC-
ESSING, UNTIL 778181 FLOW—DAILY, AMMONIA RNt> FECRL COLIFORMS-
-I10NIHLV GRRBS, DISS OXVCMG/L>2 GRRBS/ULLK flFTER 778701 FLOW
DfllLV, D 0 NT LESS THAN 4MQ/L Z GRBS/'MK SEE PERMIT FOR SRUKRT
MAJOR BRSIH - BEAR LAKE
MINOR BASIN = CUB RIVER
1ST LEVEL MILE= VTf 70
2ND LEVEL niLE» 015 78
3RD LEVEL MILE=
PERMIT EXPIRES- 79/-12/31
THIS INDUSTRY IS LOCATED IN SEGMENT BB-40
r.-
DfHTfc. RANGE
He*******************
75/83/86 TO
RECItVIHG UATER= CUB RIVER
LAf= 42-88-18 LONG= 111-49-88
TRT CODE- POP E0=
PARAMETER DESCRIPTION MINIMUM
PH
TEMPERATURE FAHRENHEIT DEQ-F
BOD LB&/DRV
SUSPENDED SOLIDS LBS/DRV
6 80
AVERAGE
********
288
688
MAXIMUM
EXC
***
TVPE
9 88
75 0
600
1500
GRAB
GRAB
COMH
COMk
FREQ
+*****
2/UEEK
I/WEEK
2/UtEK
2/WbEK
DATA SOURCE
********+**
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
PERMIT COND
-------
1
1 Stream
IBEAR R.—
BWyo. border
Hto Bear Lk.
•confluence,
Hincluding
•Thomas Fk.
H& Montpeliei
HCk.
i_
HBEAR LAKE—
frutlets &
Htribs to
Wear R.
1
WEAR R.~
H Bear Lake
nj confluence
g to Soda
1 Springs
1
1
I
River
Mile
285.0-
238.9
238.97
Utah bor.-
0
238.9-
206.2
Segment
Number
BB-10
BB-120
BB-20
Biological Status
o
o
<
X
X
X
.a"
O
X
•
<
z
X
X
PHYS./CHEM./ BIOLOGICAL
PROBLEMS
On Bear R. , extensive silta-
tion in spring. On Thomas Fk.
siltation on lower end. Mont.
Ck. has irrigation related
problems. Some turbidity &
nutrient problems.
Extensive channel modification
with poor fishery habitat &
low populations. Turbidity,
nutrients, pH, & conductivity.
Silt, low, & slow flow at cer-
tain times of year; irrigation/
ag. related problems. Nutri-
ents & turbidity. More desir-
able fish species found in this
reach, but populations are
quite low. Lower end of
Georgetown Ck. is affected by
irrigation diversion.
Recreational Status
o
o
-------
I Stream
i BEAR R.—
gSoda
1 Springs to
I Oneida Dam
a
1
1
1
1
i
IBEAR R.—
•Oneida Dam
|to Utah
Bborder
tlTTLE MAL-
u
mD R. &
SlALAD R. —
EL
Sources to
HJtah bor.
1 ,.
River
Mile
206.2-
147.0
151.1-
125.3
Segment
Number
BB-30
BB-40
BB-471
Biological Status
o
0
<
X
X
X
.0"
O
X
X
1
<
z
X
X
PHYS./CHEM./ BJQLQGICAL
PROBLEMS
Alexander Res. affected by
siltation & other influences
from Bear R. Blw. Alex. Res.
to Grace Dam is ace. due to
settling effect of Alex. Res.
From abv. Thatcher to Oneida
Dam siltation is main problem.
Other related problems in this
segment are diversions, tur-
bidity, & nutrients.
Bear R. from Oneida Dam to N.
of Preston is ace. due to set-
tling effect of Oneida Res.
From Hwy 91 to state line is
N.A. due to turbidity problems.
Battle Ck. is N.A. due to turb-
idity. Mink Ck. is ob j . due to
channel alterations. Other
problems in segment are temp,
nutrients, & diversions.
Temp., slow flow, extensive
diversions, siltation, & low
fish populations.
Recreational Status
o
o
i
X
X
X
f
X
X
<
z
X
X
PRQBLEMS/EFFECTS-
Rec. varies due to Bio.
Status. Those reaches that
are ob j . have low aesthetic
appeal, & accessibility is
limited due to land ownership
Fluctuating flow, turbidity,
channel alterations, silta-
tion, slow flow, and other
phys . /chem. /biological
factors (listed under Bio.
Status)
Rec is governed by Bio.
Status & low aesthetic appeal
-------
Stream
DEEP CREEK-
Source to
Utah
border
Contacts:
River
Mile
John Heimer
Segment
Number
BB-480
Biological Status
o
u
<
X
15"
O
, Idaho Fish & Game -
<
2_
X
PHYS./CHEM./ BIOLOGICAL
PROBLEMS
Silt, low flow, extensive
diversions in the lower
reaches.
'Recreational Status
o
O
------- |