••3d States
Environmental Protection
Age-
Washington
NOVEMBER 1990
*: EPA
Hazardous Waste Incineration
EMISSIONS TESTING OF A
PRECALCINER CEMENT KILN AT
LOUISVILLE, NEBRASKA
-------
Emissions Testing of a
Precalciner Cement Kiln at
Louisville, Nebraska
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste
Waste Treatment Branch
401 M Street, SW
Washington, D.C. 20460
Work Assignment Manager: Mr. Dwight Hlustick
November 1990
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This document was prepared by the EPA's Office of Solid Waste under the
direction of Mr. J. Robert Holloway, Chief of the Combustion Section, Waste
Treatment Branch, Waste Management Division, and Dwight Hlustick and
Shiva Garg, also of the Combustion Section. Field testing and technical
support 1n the preparation of this document were provided by Midwest Research
Institute (MRI) under Contract No. 68-01-7287. MRI staff who assisted with
field sampling, laboratory analysis, and preparation of the report were
Dr. Alfred Melners, Mr. Jon Onstot, Dr. Andres Romeu, Dr. George Schell,
Mr. Andrew Trenholm, and Ms. Deann Williams.
111
-------
CONTENTS
Acknowl edgments i i i
1. Introduction 1-1
2. Conclusions 2-1
3. Project Description 3-1
3.1 Project objectives 3-1
3.2 Process description 3-2
3.3 Test description 3-9
4. Discussion of Results 4-1
4.1 Process operation 4-1
4.2 Organic compound emissions 4-6
4.3 CT and NOX emissions 4-26
Appendices
Appendix A—Sampling and Analysis Methods A-l
A-l Sampl ing procedures A-5
A-2 Sample handling and analysis A-29
A-3 Procedures for volatile organic analysis A-39
A-4 Semivolatlle organic analysis and PCDD/PCDF determination... A-71
A-5 TOC analysis procedures A-103
A-6 Data reduction/interpretation A-115
Appendix B—Sampling and Analysis Data B-l
B-l CEM data measured by Ash Grove B-5
B-2 Process data measured by Ash Grove B-17
B-3 Fuel/waste characterization B-21
B-4 TOC and inorganic compound analysis results B-33
B-5 CEM data measured by MR I B-39
B-6 Organic mass data B-83
B-7 Total hydrocarbon and total organic mass data B-91
B-8 HC1 data B-121
B-9 Volatile organics data B-155
B-10 Semivolatile organics data B-201
Appendix C—Qual 1ty Assurance/Quality Control C-l
1v
-------
FIGURES
Number Page
3-1 General plant layout 3-3
3-2 Process flow diagram 3-4
3-3 Pyroclone precalciner configuration 3-6
3-4 Sampling locations 3-14
3-5 Ash Grove facility CEM system 3-20
4-1 Comparison of TOM and HC levels 4-15
4-2 MCB concentration vs. chlorine Input 4-18
Number
TABLES
Page
3-1 Summary of sampling and analysis activities 3-11
4-1 Average values for process operating parameters 4-2
4-2 Facility CEM average data 4-4
4-3 Organic mass data for Run 1 4-8
4-4 Carbon mass distribution 4-10
4-5 Average carbon mass for each test condition 4-11
4-6 HC and TOM emissions (bypass duct and main duct) 4-13
4-7 MCB PIC formation 4-16
4-8 ORE values for MCB 4-19
4-9 Bypass duct PIC screening data 4-21
4-10 Main duct PIC screening data 4-22
4-11 Comparison of kiln and incinerator PICs 4-24
4-12 Dioxin/furan concentrations 4-25
4-13 Ash Grove TOC/THC comparisons 4-26
4-14 Chloride emissions 4-28
4-15 Chloride removal efficiency 4_30
4-16 Comparison of chloride levels with potassium and
ammonium levels in the HC1 sampling train impingers 4-31
4-17 Ash Grove NOX data and operating temperatures 4-33
-------
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION
The Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste (EPA/OSW), is
developing regulations to control emissions of products of incomplete combus-
tion (PICs) from cement kilns. The emission parameters planned for use in
this regulation are total hydrocarbons (HCs) and carbon monoxide (CO). To
support the use of these parameters as surrogates for PICs, more information
from full-scale testing of dry cement kilns is needed. As a part of this
data-gathering effort, a test was conducted at the Ash Grove Cement Company
precalciner kiln in Louisville, Nebraska.
The Ash Grove facility was selected for the test for two reasons. It has
a precalciner as part of the cement-making process, a technology expected to
be used for cement production more frequently in the future. The facility
also burns both liquid and solid hazardous waste as supplementary fuels in the
kiln.
The remaining sections of this Test Report present a detailed
description of the test. Section 2 is a summary of the conclusions drawn froni
the test. Section 3 presents a description of the test project including the
project objectives, facility operations, and test design. A discussion of the
results of this study is provided in Section 4.
Three appendices contain additional Information as follows: Appendix A
presents a detailed discussion of the sampling and analysis methods used in
the study, Appendix B provides the experimental data from the study, and
Appendix C 1s a review of quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC)
activities.
1-1
-------
SECTION 2
CONCLUSIONS
This section contains brief statements of the major conclusions
determined from analysis of the data generated during this project. Further
discussion of these conclusions and other aspects of the data are presented in
Section 4.
1. There was no detectable effect on the levels of total organic mass
(TOM), hot total hydrocarbons (HC), or cold total hydrocarbon (HC)
from burning waste versus coal in either the bypass or main ducts.
Organic mass emissions in the main duct appear to be related to
organic material in the process raw material and/or coal combustion
in the pyroclone.
2. Low levels (near detection limits) of TOM and hot and cold HC
prevented comparison of these measures of organic mass emissions in
the bypass duct. Data for the main duct show that TOM and hot HC
levels agreed well and that cold HC levels were about 70% of the
other two measures.
3. Determination of the destruction and removal efficiency (ORE) of
monochlorobenzene (MCB) was complicated by the formation of MCB as a
PIC in the main duct emissions. Estimates of the ORE, discounting
MCB formed as a PIC, were about 99.994fc. However, this ORE could
not be measured directly.
4. Formation of MCB as a PIC was related to high benzene levels in the
main duct emissions and to the amount of chlorine input to the
2-1
-------
kiln. In the presence of benzene, MCB concentrations increased as
the input of chlorine increased.
5. The concentrations and identity of PICs measured, including dioxins
and furans, were generally similar to those historically detected in
hazardous waste incinerator gases.
6. Chloride emissions calculated as HC1 were less than 4 Ib/h and were
about 1% of the chlorine input rate to the kiln.
7. Relatively high levels of ammonium ion compared to chloride ion were
measured in the HC1 sampling train. Evaluation of this result leads
to a plausible interpretation of the data that the measured chloride
was ammonium chloride, not HC1. Literature sources indicate that at
the measured stack temperatures and stack gas concentrations,
ammonium chloride would vaporize and be almost totally dissociated
to HC1 and ammonia.
2-2
-------
SECTION 3.0
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This section presents the project objectives, a description of the Ash
Grove facility operations, the test design, and a summary of the sampling and
analysis
3.1 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
The test at the Ash Grove kiln was designed to gather emission data for
three modes of process operation: one using liquid and solid waste feed, a
second with liquid waste feed only, and a third, a baseline mode, using no
waste feed. The data-gathering objectives were to characterize these three
operating modes as follows:
1. Measure and compare emission levels of THCs (using both a heated and
unheated monitor system), and total organic mass (TOM).
2. Measure the levels of carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (C02),
and oxygen (02) in the process exhaust gases.
3. Measure PIC emission, Including dioxins and furans, for comparison
to historical data from other hazardous waste combustion devices.
4. Determine the destruction and removal efficiency (ORE) of a hard-to-
destruct Appendix VIII compound (monochlorobenzene) spiked Into the
solid hazardous waste feed.
3-1
-------
5. Measure the emission levels of hydrogen chloride (HC1). Ammonium
and potassium concentrations were also measured.
6. Obtain data on emission levels of nitrogen oxides (NOX) monitored by
the facility.
7. Measure the levels of total organic carbon (TOC) in the cement kiln
raw material feed for comparison to historical data from other
cement kilns and as a source of background data.
8. Obtain data from Ash Grove that characterizes the fossil fuel and
hazardous waste fed to the kiln.
9. Obtain data on process operating conditions monitored by the
facility.
3.2 PROCESS DESCRIPTION
The Ash Grove-Louisville facilities consist of the following: (1) quar-
ries from which raw materials are extracted; (2) grinding and blending opera-
tions for preparing a homogeneous, properly proportioned mixture of raw
materials; (3) an alkali bypass kiln and a precalciner kiln which convert the
raw materials into cement clinker; (4) grinding mills in which the clinker is
finely ground and mixed with gypsum to form the cement product; (5) storage,
bagging, and materials transfer equipment; and (6) office, maintenance, dust
disposal, and related areas. Figure 3-1 illustrates the general plant layout.
The test was conducted on the precalciner rotary kiln system. This
system is designed to generate 1,800 tons of clinker per day at an energy use
of 3.0 million Btu/ton. This system, shown in Figure 3-2, is essentially
composed of the following subsystems:
Rotary kiln
• Pyroclone precalciner
Fuel feed
3-2
-------
mnrmiucxxxxji
Figure 3-1. General plant layout.
-------
A To Atmosphere
n ) Fan
CO
To Clinker
Storage
90-28 SEV will schem 070290
Figure 3-2. Process flow diagram.
-------
Emissions management
• Clinker handling systems
• Operational controls
3.2.1 Rotary Kiln
The Humboldt-Wedag (H-W) rotary kiln 1s a sloped cylinder, 12 1/2 ft in
diameter and 164 ft long. At the downslope end, the kiln can be fired with
No. 2 fuel oil, natural gas, pulverized coal, and/or liquid organic waste.
Pulverized coal and/or solid waste can be fired near the upslope end of the
kiln. Kiln temperatures are about 2800°F in the combustion zone and 1900°F at
the gas exit.
Raw materials (i.e., homogenized limestone, clay-stone mix, and iron ore)
are introduced to the kiln at the upslope end via a pyroclone precalclner (see
Section 3.2.2). The kiln is operated as a countercurrent system; i.e., as the
kiln rotates, solids gravitate toward the downslope end of the unit and hot
combustion gases travel toward the upslope end. An average 4- to 5-s gas
phase residence time is provided in the kiln.
At the upslope end of the kiln, combustion gases are channeled to either
the pyroclone precalciner or a bypass system. In the bypass system, combus-
tion gases are cooled with air and water sprays prior to release through an
electrostatic precipitator.
3.2.2 Pyroclone Precalciner
The pyroclone precalciner is utilized to preheat and precalcinate raw
material prior to introduction to the rotary kiln. Materials are approxi-
mately 60% prepared by the time they enter the upslope end of the rotary
kiln. The pyroclone precalciner system can be subdivided into two primary
components: a four-stage cyclone preheater and the pyroclone. Figure 3-3
illustrates the general configuration of the system.
3-5
-------
Raw
Material
Feed
4-Stage Cyclone Preheater
Emissions to Main ESP
Coal/Petroleum Coke
Tertiary Air
-Pass Combustion Air-
Out to Air/H2O
Quench then to
By-pass ESP
Solid
Hazardous
Wastes
90-26 SEV wJI,c^m2 070290
Figure 3-3. Pyroclone precalciner configuration.
3-6
-------
3.2.2.1 Cyclone Preheater--
Raw materials are metered to the cyclone preheater from feed bins and
enter the preheater at the vertical duct (riser duct) between the stage 1 and
stage 2 cyclones. Raw materials are entrained in the gas stream from one
stage to the next until they reach the pyroclone riser. Temperatures range
from approximately 660°F in the stage 1 cyclone to 1630°F in the stage 4
cyclone.
3.2.2.2 Pyroclone--
The pyroclone is actually an extension of the riser between the kiln
exhaust hood and stage 4 cyclone. As mentioned previously, hot combustion
gases from the rotary kiln which do not escape to the bypass system are chan-
neled to the pyroclone. Auxiliary fuel (in addition to the combustion gas
heat) is added in the pyroclone by the introduction of a pulverized coal/
petroleum coke fuel mix. By maintaining sufficient fuel in the pyroclone, a
"flameless" combustion zone is created to preheat and calcine the materials
entrained in the precalciner system.
Auxiliary preheated air is provided in the pyroclone precalciner through
a tertiary air duct. Preheated combustion air from the downslope end of the
kiln is introduced to the pyroclone via the tertiary air inlet duct, located
below the coal/coal fuel inlet and above the kiln exhaust hood.
3.2.3 Fuel Systems
3.2.3.1 Pure Fuel Feed—
The precalciner kiln is brought up to operating temperature and operating
temperatures are maintained by use of a "pure" fuel feed (i.e., No. 2 fuel
oil, natural gas, and/or a pulverized coal and petroleum coke fuel mix).
No. 2 fuel oil and natural gas are introduced via burners in the down-
slope end of the kiln. The position and flame shapes in the downslope portion
of the kiln allow for sufficient cooling of clinker product.
Coal/petroleum coke is fired via a burner in the downslope end of the
kiln and in the pyroclone section of the precalciner. The coal/petroleum coke
3-7
-------
grinding system uses exhaust gas from clinker cooler as the source of heat and
low oxygen gas for drying the coal.
3.2.3.2 Waste Feed--
Operating temperatures in the precalciner kiln may also be maintained by
use of liquid and solid hazardous wastes. The physical and chemical prop-
erties of wastes will vary slightly from day to day. All waste fuels are
physically and chemically characterized prior to acceptance at the facility to
ensure that waste constituents can be appropriately managed through the
precalciner kiln.
Preblended liquid organic wastes are stored in bulk tanks on the site.
Liquid organic waste is introduced at the atomizing burner in the downslope
end of the kiln. The burner position and flame shape allow for sufficient
cooling of clinker product.
Containerized solids (I.e., 7-gal drums) are introduced to the rotary
kiln via an enclosed drum feed mechanism, located along the kiln's exhaust
hood. The drum feed mechanism is essentially composed of a drum elevator,
conveyor, and pusher; a drum feed hopper with hopper door; a kiln charging
door; and drum feed chute. The hopper door and kiln charging door are
sequenced and interlocked to prevent flashbacks. The feed cycle is variable
with a maximum number of cycles at two per minute. Each container is
individually weighed prior to feeding to the kiln and the weight written on
the container to record solids feed quantities.
3.2.4 Emissions Control
Bypass combustion gas emissions are controlled by the bypass electro-
static precipitator. Gases exhausted from the pyroclone precalciner are
controlled by the main electrostatic precipitator. Most of the collected dust
is recycled with kiln feed; a small part of the dust is utilized to backfill
quarried properties.
3-8
-------
Dust control for the clinker cooler is provided through baghouses.
Collected dust is returned to the clinker handling system for subsequent
processing.
An induced draft fan provides the motive power for the entire process
train (i.e., rotary kiln, bypass, and main dust precipitators). The fan
produces a system-wide negative pressure that prevents fugitive emissions.
Treated exhaust gases from the bypass precipltator and main precipitator are
vented to a common exhaust stack.
3.2.5 Clinker Handling System
Clinker is discharged from the kiln into the clinker cooler which uses a
water tube heat exchanger to cool the product. Cooling air is discharged to
the coal preheater, precalciner, and kiln. After cooling, clinker is mixed
with gypsum and ground in a finish mill to make the final cement product.
3.2.6 Operational Controls
The precalciner kiln is operated with a computer-based control system.
This system is configured to provide semiautomatic operation of the kiln, with
operator manual adjustments to fine-tune performance. The system provides a
visual display and hard copy record of monitoring parameters (e.g., kiln
operating temperatures, CO and 02 concentrations, HC concentrations, nitrogen
oxide [NOX], fuel feed rates, etc.).
3.3 TEST DESCRIPTION
This section provides a description of the test program. The test
design, sampling and analysis activities, and facility monitoring activities
are described. Data reduction methods and calculations are presented in
Appendix A-4.
3-9
-------
3.3.1 Test Design
The test program involved a matrix of five, 2-h test runs at three
defined kiln operating conditions. The first test condition (Condition A)
involved two duplicate test runs. The precalciner kiln was operated at stable
conditions with liquid waste fired at the discharge end of the kiln and solid
waste fired at the upslope end of the kiln. During this test condition, mono-
chlorobenzene was poured into the solid waste feed drums and analyzed in the
exhaust gas streams.
The second test condition (Condition B) involved a single test run and
was conducted at baseline operating conditions. The precalciner kiln was
operated at essentially stable conditions with no waste feed to the system.
The third test condition (Condition C) involved two duplicate test
runs. The precalciner kiln was operated at stable conditions with liquid
waste fired at the discharge end of the kiln.
During all test conditions, a crushed coal mixture was fed to the
pyroclone precalciner.
3.3.2 Summary of MRI Sampling and Analysis Procedures
A summary of the frequency, number, type, and size (or quantity) of all
samples collected during the test is presented in Table 3-1. The table also
lists the sampling and analytical method(s) used for each sample. The matrix
presented in Table 3-1 represents the sample collection scheme for one 2-h
test run. Figure 3-4 notes the location of each sampling point. Summary
descriptions of the sampling and analysis procedures are presented below.
Appendix A-l contains a full description of the sampling and analysis
procedures utilized during the test.
-------
TABLE 3-1. SUMMARY OF SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS ACTIVITIES
Samp 1 i ng
Sample frequency
Sample location9 for each run
Main and bypass 1, 2 2-h composite per
precipitator . run
exhaust ducts
1 , 2 2-h compos i te per
run
u>
i
t— »
»— »
1, 2 Three trap pairs
at 40 min per
pair
1, 2 Sample injected
every 10-15 min
1 , 2 One compos i te
sample per run
1, 2 Continuous
Samp 1 i ng
method
Method 0010
HCI trainf
VOST 0030h
Field GC
EPA Reference
Method 3
Method 10
MM25Ak
Method 3A
Method 3A
MM25Ak
Sample size Analytical
(total) parameters
,c .
60-100 ft3 PCDD/PCDFd
> C17 organic
mass
Organic screen
Moisture
Temperature
Velocity
60-100 ft3 HCI
Potassium ion
Ammonium ion
20 L per Organic screen
train pair V POHC1
C1 - C17
Organic mass
- 20 L Oxygen,
carbon dioxide
CO
THC (cold)
CO/
°2
THC (hot)
Preparation
method"
Solvent extraction
Solvent extraction
Solvent extraction
NA
NA
NA
NA
Thermal desorption
Thermal desorption
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Analytical methodb
GC/MSe
Gravimetric
GC/MS
Gravimetric
Thermocouple
Pi tot tube
Ion chromatography
(04327-84)
ICP-AES9
Selective ion
measurement
GC/MS
GC/MS
Field GC/FIDJ
Orsat
EPA Method 10
EPA MM25Ak
EPA Method 3A
EPA Method 3A
EPA MM25Ak
(continued)
-------
TABLE 3-1 (continued)
Samp 1 e
Kiln fired
materials
(raw meal feed)
Liquid waste
CO
i
t—*
ro
Sol id waste
Samp 1 i ng
Sample frequency
location9 for each run
3 One grab sample
taken every
30 mln,
compos i ted i nto
one sample per
run
4 One grab sample
taken every 30
mln, compos i ted
into one sample
per run
5 One grab sample
Sampling Sample size Analytical Preparation
method (total) parameters method"
Scoop (S007) 500 g Total organic
carbon
Tap 600 raL Heating value NA
Chlorine
Scoop (S007) 500 g Heating value NA
Analytical method
Combustion with
evolved C02
anal ysis
Calorimeter
(D240)m
Organic chlorine"1
(ASTM D1317-1318)
Calorimeter
ESP dust
6. 7
taken every 15
min, composited
into one sample
per run
One grab per run Scoop
500 g
(continued)
Chlorine
V-POHC
Archive
Dispersion/
purge and trap
NA
(0240)*°
Organic chlorine"1
(ASTM D1317-1318)
GC/MSm
NA
-------
TABLE 3-1 (continued)
Sample
Sample location9
Coal fuel 6
a Sample location referenced
Samp 1 1 ng
frequency Sampling Sample size Analytical Preparation
for each run method (total) parameters method*1
One grab sample Scoop - 500 g Heating value NA
Chlorine NA
in Figure 3-4.
Analytical method
Calorimeter
(D240)k
Organic Cl~
(DI316-1317)k
co c
i
co d
e
f
g
h
i
j
k
I
m
protocol.
Exact volume of gas sampled dependent on isoklnetic sampling rate.
PCDO/PCOF—Polychlorinated dibenzodioxins/polychlorinated dibenzofurans collected during the baseline run, run 2 of test Condition A,
and run 4 of test Condition B.
GC/MS = gas chromatography/mass spectrometry.
HCI train—HCI sampling train based on the EPA "Draft Method for the Determination of HCI Emissions from Municipal and Hazardous
Waste Incinerators" (USEPA, QAD, July 1988).
ICP/AES = Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy.
Volatile organic sampling train.
Volatile principal organic hazardous constituent; measured during test Condition B only (monochlorobenzene).
GC/FID = gas chromatograph-flame ionization detector.
MM25A—Modified Method 25A.
E6-5—Galbraith Laboratories method for inorganic carbon analysis; ME-6, ME-7—Galbraith Labs method for total carbon analysis.
Waste/fuel materials sampled and analyzed by Ash Grove to define chemical and physical characteristics.
-------
f A To Atmosphere
90-21 SEV willschem 1 06149O
HotGases
toCoal
Preheater
To Clinker
Storage
—f) Sample Location
Figure 3-4. Sampling locations.
-------
3.3.2.1 Combustion Gas—
Combustion gas was isoklnetically sampled at the main and bypass electro-
static precipltator exhaust ducts. Samples were collected at a 30-ft eleva-
tion, through four sampling ports located across the width of each rectangular
duct. Both ducts were sampled to detect any difference in emissions between
the two exhaust streams. Exhaust gases are transferred from the separate
ducts to a common stack; hence total emission quantities could be determined
by combining the measured separate emission quantities.
Each type of combustion gas sampling and analysis 1s summarized below.
Total Hydrocarbon (HC) and Total Organic Mass (TOM)
HC emissions were measured using heated and unheated EPA Modified
Method 25A (M25A) sampling systems, equipped with flame 1on1zat1on detectors
(FIDs). As a means of comparison, total organic carbon mass emissions were
measured using a Method 0010 sampling train (I.e., SW-846 Method 0010) and a
field gas chromatograph (GC). The GC, equipped with an FID, was used to
determine Cl through C17 carbon fractions (up to 300°C boiling point).
Samples from the Method 0010 train were analyzed gravimetrically to determine
the carbon fraction greater than C17 (> 300°C boiling point). The gravimetric
and GC fractions, together, provide a total organic mass (TOM) value which can
be quantitatively compared to the Modified M25A THC values. This comparison
was made on the basis of emissions calculated as propane. The organic mass
sampling approach was developed from the existing EPA Level 1 testing proto-
cols, as defined in the Level 1 Source Assessment Manual.
During the test, HC and TOM measurements were checked by measuring sample
line bias. A nitrogen blank sample was analyzed by GC and the HC monitor at
the conclusion of each test run to determine the potential for organics to
desorb out of sample lines. Ambient air measurements were also made at the
conclusion of each test run for comparison to the HC and TOM measurements.
3-15
-------
Organic Screen
The organic screen was conducted to provide characterization of organic
compounds, or PICs, present 1n exhaust gases. Volatile organics were deter-
mined using a volatile organic sampling train (VOST) as described in SW-846
Method 0030. VOST samples were analyzed by gas chromatography/mass spectrom-
etry (GC/MS). Semivolatile oryanics were determined using the SW-846
Method 0010 sampling train (previously referenced for organic mass gravimetric
determinations). These samples were analyzed by GC/MS. The screen was used
to define compounds amenable to the analytical techniques described in
Appendix A-4 Including the five largest GC peaks.
As a part of the organic screen, total polychlorinated d1benzod1ox1n and
polychlorinated dibenzofuran (PCDD/PCDF) concentrations were determined in
exhaust gas during three of the five test runs. PCDDs/PCDFs were analyzed
from a separate split of the extract from the above-referenced Method 0010
sample train.
Destruction and Removal Efficiency
The precaldner kiln was tested to determine the ORE of a volatile
principal organic hazardous constituent (POHC) in the drummed waste fed to the
kiln. The POHC for the test was monochlorobenzene (MCB). MCB is ranked 19th
on the Thermal Stability (TSLo02) incinerability ranking system, and is one of
the highest ranking (most difficult to destroy), fully evaluated Appendix VIII
organic compounds.1 A volatile compound was chosen to provide a worst case
test of rapid volatilization of the POHC.
The VOST (as described for the organic screen) was used to sample for
MCB. Appendix A-3 defines the analysis procedures used for volatiles deter-
mination. Section 3.3.3 describes the POHC spiking and waste analysis
procedures for subsequent ORE determination.
Delllnger, B., M.D. Graham, and 0. A. T1rey, "Predicting Emissions from
the Thermal Processing of Hazardous Wastes," Hazardous Waste and
Hazardous Materials, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1986.
3-16
-------
Hydrogen Chloride (HC1). Ammonia, and Potassium
Total HC1 was determined 1n exhaust gas for comparison to historical data
from other cement kilns. Ammonium and potassium ion concentrations were also
determined. HC1 concentrations were analyzed by ion chromatography, ammonium
concentrations were determined by selective ion measurement, and potassium
concentrations were determined by inductively coupled atomic emission spec-
troscopy (ICP-AES). Samples were collected .based on the EPA's "Draft Method
for the Determination of HC1 Emissions from Municipal and Hazardous Waste
Incinerators" (USEPA, Source Branch Quality Assurance Division, July 1988).
Continuous Emissions Monitors (CEMs)
Carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (C02), and oxygen (02) were
monitored throughout the test. CO was sampled and analyzed following EPA
reference Method 10; C02 and 02 were monitored using EPA reference Methods 3
and 3A. Appendix A-l describes the MRI continuous emissions monitors, and
Section 3.3.3.3 describes the Ash Grove monitoring system.
3.3.2.2 Raw Materials Sampling—
The raw materials feed (e.g., crushed limestone, clay, etc.) was sampled
once every 30 min during each test run. These grab samples were then
composited into a single sample for each run for TOC analysis. A metal trier
was used for the collection of the raw feed samples. All samples were
collected at the inlet feed chute, located adjacent to the precalciner.
3.3.2.3 Electrostatic Precipitator (ESP) Dust Sampling-
Dust discharged from the main and bypass electrostatic precipltators
(ESPs) was sampled at the end of each run. These samples were archived for
future analysis, if necessary.
3-17
-------
3.3.3 Summary of Ash Grove Sampling/Analysis Activities
3.3.3.1 POHC Spiking--
During Runs 1 and 2 (i.e., Test Condition A), the precalciner kiln was
tested to determine the destruction and removal efficiency (ORE) of mono-
chlorobenzene (MCB) spiked into the solid waste feed. A 1-L quantity of MCB
was poured into each solid waste charge (i.e., each 7-gal drum), prior to the
test. Drums were loaded to the kiln at a rate of 40 drums/h, resulting in a
MCB feed rate of 40 1/h (738 g/min).
The 7-gal drums were fitted with a vapor seal in the lid, preventing
release of volatiles from the drum. Drums were sealed immediately following
spiking. About 10% of the drums were opened for sampling immediately prior to
feeding to the kiln.
3.3.3.2 Waste Feed Analysis—
The liquid waste was sampled by Ash Grove from a tap located in the waste
feed line. Grab samples were collected and composited throughout the course
of each run. Approximately 100 ml grab samples were collected, starting
15 min after the start of each test run and every 30 min thereafter. A total
of 6 grab samples were collected, resulting in an approximate 600 ml composite
sample for each run.
The solid waste was sampled by Ash Grove from the waste drums. Approxi-
mately 100 mL grab samples were collected every 15 min (every 10th drum) and
composited to form a single sample for each run.
Waste samples were analyzed by Ash Grove and an independent laboratory to
define the chemical and physical characteristics of the wastes burned during
the test. This information included concentration of POHC present, heat of
combustion (Btu value), and total chlorine. Section 4 provides additional
Information concerning the data compiled for wastes during the test. Appen-
dix B contains copies of the laboratory analysis reports for the waste/fuel
samples.
3-18
-------
3.3.3.3 Process Monitors-
Process data measured by Ash Grove process monitors was recorded through-
out each 2-h run. Specific parameters monitored are listed in Section 4.
Facility emissions monitors measured 02, NOX, CO and cold HC in the main
and bypass ESP exhaust ducts. Oxygen was measured using a paramagnetic
sensor. Nitrogen oxide was measured using a Thermo Electron Model 10 chemi-
luminescent monitor. Carbon monoxide was measured using a Fuji Model 3300
infrared analyzer, and total hydrocarbon was measured using a Ratfisch
Model RS55 with FID. All data, including calibration data, were recorded for
each 2-h run.
Figure 3-5 is a schematic of the facility CEM system. A gas sample is
collected alternately from each duct every 7.5 min. The sampling system
operates on a cycle, I.e., equilibration, back purge, prime, and sampling.
The sampling portion of this cycle 1s 2.5 min. The gas sample is transferred
via a heated (I.e., 250°F) Teflon sample line to a condenser which is operated
at 28° to 34°F for H20 removal. The sample is then split for THC, CO, 02, and
NOX analysis.
3-19
-------
Uakt V
Duct f
Bypass
Dud
Urn
(I
i
CaL
Cast
NO./SOJ
?)
y
2aL
3a$2
VCO
V
J
>
L_
I*
CaL f|
Gas
X
Compcaesad
Air
X
9
Vacuum
GauM
* • Pi d
• k^L vx
• Puirp
Filer
J Drain
- 1 CSifiriS
(28-M34-F)
Drain
HoniuxCaMnM
Figure 3-5. Ash Grove facility CEM system.
-------
SECTION 4
DISCUSSION OF RESULTS
This section discusses the results of the test and analyzes the data
relative to the project objectives. The section is divided Into three sub-
sections. The first discusses process data and operation of the precalciner
kiln. The second subsection discusses organic compound emissions, and the
third discusses inorganic compound emissions.
4.1 PROCESS OPERATION
Table 4-1 presents average values of the principal process operating
parameters for each test run. Table 4-2 presents additional CEM data from the
facility monitors. Process operation was replicated closely from run to run,
except for planned variations in the feed of coal and waste to the kiln for
each test condition. Process capacity, as measured by the raw material feed
rate was within 95 to 98 tons/h for all runs. Kiln exit gas temperature
(measured at the entrance to the precalciner where some cooling from
infiltration air had occurred) was consistently within the range of 1830° to
1970°F. Inaccurate temperature data were obtained for Run 4, believed to
result from a thermocouple problem.
Oxygen and carbon monoxide concentrations, and stack gas flow in the
bypass duct are also Indicative of kiln operation; however, the values of
these parameters are heavily Influenced by dilution from cooling air and water
sprays. The higher oxygen concentration, slightly higher stack gas flow rate,
and lower carbon dioxide concentration for Run 1 show this dilution effect.
4-1
-------
TABLE 4-1. AVERAGE VALUES FOR PROCESS OPERATING PARAMETERS*
Process condition: Liquid + solid waste
Parameter
Run 1
Run 2
Coal only
Run 3
Liquid waste
Run 4
Run 5
IV)
Raw material feed rate, ton/h
K1ln coal feed
Rate, ton/h
Heating value, Btu/lb
Chlorine content, %
K1ln liquid waste feed
Rate, ton/h
Heating value, Btu/lb
Chlorine content, %
Kiln solid waste feed
Rate, ton/h
Heating value, Btu/lb
Chlorine content, 1»
K1ln heat Input, 10* Btu/h
K1ln chlorine Input, Ib/h
K1ln exit gas temperature, °F
Raw meal kiln Inlet temperature, °F
Entrance kiln gas pressure, 1nHg
Exit kiln gas pressure, inHg
Kiln speed, rph
K1ln current, amps
Fourth stage cyclone temperature, °F
ESP dust recycle, t/h
Pyroclone coal feed
Rate, ton/h
Heating value, Btu/lb
Chlorine content, %
Pyroclone temperature, "F
Bypass duct 02 concentration, %
Bypass duct C02 concentration, %
Bypass duct CO concentration, ppmv
Bypass duct NOX Concentration, ppmv
98
96
1.0
12,300
ND
2.9
10.100
2.0
0.9
8,600
3.3
108
194
1970
1567
-0.112
-0.819
113.7
178.2
1567
1.202
8.0
12,300
ND
1600
18.3
1.8
13
310
1.0
12,300
ND
3.6
10,000
2.2
0.9
8,400
3.7
124
248
1880
1606
-0.124
0.613
112.2
228.1
1593
1.120
7.7
12,300
ND
1620
17.5
2.2
19
720
(continued)
95
5.1
12,300
NO
ND
ND
138
ND
1940
1599
-0.142
0.517
112.2
244.2
1520
0.960
7.3
12,300
ND
1620
16.4
4.2
8
1,170
95
0.0
12,300
ND
5.8
11.200
1.7
ND
143
217
b
1594
-0.161
0.583
104.5
226.2
1573
1,077
7.4
12,300
ND
1600
16.8C
3.4
49
470
97
0.0
12,300
ND
5.8
11.200
1.7
ND
143
215
1830
1589
-0.139
0.645
110.2
258.9
1571
0.831
7.2
12,300
ND
1600
16.4
3.2
37
770
-------
TABLE 4-1. (continued)
Process condition:
Parameter
Bypass ESP Inlet temperature, °F
Bypass ESP outlet temperature, °F
Bypass ESP outlet pressure, inHg
Bypass quench water, gpm
Bypass damper setting open, %
Bypass duct gas flow rate, dscf/min
Bypass ESP voltage, kV
First stage
Second stage
Third stage
Main duct 02 concentration, %
Main duct C02 concentration, %
Main duct CO concentration, ppmv
Main duct NOX concentration, ppmv
Main ESP inlet temperature, °F
Main ESP Inlet pressure, in H20
Main duct gas flow rate, dscf/min
Liquid +
Run 1
700
1567
-3.074
6.0
50.0
25,130
36.1
32.6
27.2
4.2
34
790
410
740
-28.03
51,600
solid waste
Run 2
700
1593
-2.567
8.0
40.0
23,600
36.6
30.3
27.8
4.0
32
830
440
760
-28.04
51,700
Coal only
Run 3
700
1520
-2.639
8.0
40.0
24,500
35.9
34.3
27.5
4.4
31
240
510
720
-26.81
52,700
Liquid
Run 4
700
1573
-2.908
8.0
40.0
24,300
34.8
29.6
28.1
4.3
31
950
420
740
-28.08
53,400
waste
Run 5
710
1571
-2.508
8.0
40.0
23,100
29.8
28.1
4.0
30
560
530
740
-27.65
51,600
NO = None detected.
a All data are from the facility process control computer except heating values and chlorine contents from
facility analyses, gas flows from stack sampling, and 02, C02, and CO concentrations from
MRI monitors.
b Temperature was measured as 1570°F, but was judged Inaccurate due to a thermocouple problem.
c Value 1s from facility monitor which agrees with Orsat analysis of the stack gas. Value from the MRI
monitor was suspect. All other 02, C02, and CO values were measured by MRI's monitors.
-------
TABLE 4-2. FACILITY CEM AVERAGE DATA
Parameter Units Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5
CEM Averages
Main duct:
02
NOX
CO (dry, 7% 02)
THC (dry, 7% 02)
Opacity
Bypass duct:
02
NOX
CO (dry, 7% 02)
THC (dry, 7% 02)
Opacity
%
ppm
ppm
*
%
ppm
ppm
ppm
5
412
692
7
4
18
312
108
4
4
5.3
443
763
12
4
17.5
723
87
1
4
4.7
512
324
6
3
16.5
1,174
25
0
3
4.6
415
982
-1
4
16.8
472
229
0
4
4.3
529
644
6
4
16.9
765.4
203.3
1.6
4
4-4
-------
During part of Run 1 the cooling water flow rate was higher, and damper set-
tings allowed a higher flow of dilution air than for the remainder of the
test. The dilution air damper setting was 50% open during test Run 1 and at
40% open during all other test runs. Also, a water flow rate of 6 gpm was
established during test Run 1, and a flow rate of 8 gpm was established for
all other test runs. The estimated amount of dilution air was generally about
a factor of 5. The average carbon monoxide concentrations from run to run can
still be viewed as reflective of kiln operation by adjusting the values to a
common amount of C02 to account for dilution. The carbon dioxide concen-
tration can be used as a relative indicator of the amount of dilution to
adjust the CO values. Using this technique, the CO concentrations exiting the
kiln were about the same during Runs 1, 2, 4, and 5. The concentration during
Run 3 was about a factor of 5 lower than in all other runs.
Pyroclone operation was also very consistent, as shown by the lack of
variation in coal feed rate, temperature, and stack gas flow rate and oxygen
concentration in the main duct. Coal feed rate varied from 7.2 to 8.0 tons/h,
temperature from 1600° to 1620°F, and oxygen concentration from 4.0% to 4.4%.
Stack gas flow rate was about 52,000 dscf/min. Carbon monoxide concentration
in the main duct, which reflects the pyroclone operation rather than the kiln,
was also relatively consistent. The average CO concentration varied from 240
to 950 ppmv, with the lowest value occurring during Run 3.
Operation of both ESPs remained consistent. Inlet ESP temperatures
remained within a range of 720° to 760°F for the main duct ESP and 700° to
710°F for the bypass duct ESP.
Heat load to the kiln was slightly lower during Runs 1 and 2, due to a
lower feed rate of liquid waste introduced to the kiln. The heat load to the
pyroclone was higher during Runs 1 and 2, due to a higher coal feed rate.
Chlorine load to the kiln varied with the solid and liquid waste feed
rates and chlorine content. Coal was determined to have a negligible chlorine
content, thus the pyroclone did not have a measurable chlorine Input.
4-5
-------
The spiked solid waste introduced during test Runs 1 and 2 was found to
have a MCB concentration of 8.1% and 6.4fc respectively. The anticipated
concentration was 4.8%, based on a spike rate of 40 L/h MCB (1 L MCB/drum,
charged at 40 drums/h) and an average solid feed rate of 2,036 Ib/h
(approximately 50 Ib/drum). The measured MCB concentration was higher than
the anticipated MCB concentration due to the difficulty of representative
sampling of the drums. A disproportionate quantity of liquid MCB was probably
collected with each sample to bias the results on the high side. Thus, the
known quantity of MCB spiked to the drums was used to calculate MCB feed
rates.
4.2 ORGANIC COMPOUND EMISSIONS
This subsection presents a discussion of organic compound emissions.
Included are a description of: (1) total hydrocarbon (HC) and total organic
mass (TOM) emissions; (2) emissions of the spiked principal organic hazardous
constituent (POHC) and its destruction and removal efficiency (ORE); and
(3) the emissions of products of incomplete combustion (PICs), including
dioxin/furan emissions. This section also discusses the organic carbon
content of the raw material feed (i.e., crushed limestone and shale).
4.2.1. TOM and HC Emissions
Organic carbon mass emissions were quantified within boiling point ranges
which roughly equate to ranges in the number of carbon atoms in organic
compounds. Organic mass was measured using a SW-846 Method 0010 sampling
train for nonvolatiles and a field gas chromatograph (GC) for volatiles and
semlvolatlles. Samples from the Method 0010 train were analyzed gravimetri-
cally to determine the carbon fraction greater than C17 (> 300°C boiling
point). The GC, equipped with an FID, was used to determine the Cl through
C17 carbon fraction (up to 300°C boiling point). GC samples were split off
the hot HC (subsequently defined) sample line. Summed together, the
gravimetric and GC fraction provided a total organic mass (TOM) value which
was compared to total hydrocarbon (THC) data values. This comparison was made
by converting the organic mass values to propane equivalent since HC emissions
are measured as propane.
4-6
-------
HC emissions were measured by two different techniques identified here as
hot and cold HC. The primary difference was that the hot HC had a sample line
and instrument heated to 150°C and the cold HC had an ice cooled condensate
trap near the duct sampling port and an unheated sample line. Both used a
flame ionization detector (FID) as did the organic GC analyses. Both tech-
niques are described in Appendix A, along with the field GC technique. The
cold HC technique is more closely representative of historical HC monitoring
techniques. The hot HC technique is under consideration as a measurement
technique for amended hazardous waste incinerator regulations.
The following discussions of total organic mass (TOM) and HC emission
measurements is divided into three subsections. The first presents the total
organic mass results determined by the gravimetric and GC sampling systems.
The second and third presents the HC measurements and compares HC data to TOM
measurements for the bypass and main ducts, respectively.
4.2.1.1 Total Organic Mass (TOM) Emissions-
Total organic mass (TOM) was determined as three major carbon
fractions: C1-C7 volatile compounds, C7-C17 semivolatile compounds, and > C17
nonvolatile compounds. The average C1-C7 and C7-C17 fractions were calculated
from individual GC samples. An average value for the > C17 fraction was gen-
erated from the gravimetric analysis of the Method 0010 sampling train. The
reported total mass was calculated by summing the fractional carbon masses.
All carbon masses were calculated on a dry basis. Appendix B contains the
analytical data for each GC sample.
The average volatile and semivolatile data for the main duct may be
biased high or low. A limited number of discrete GC samples were analyzed
during each test run, which may or may not have corresponded in time to a
representative number and size of emission peaks. Table 4-3 presents the
analytical data for the samples collected during test Run 1. As Illustrated
in the table, two C1-C7 and C7-C17 spikes were measured at 69.54 ppm C1-C7 and
2.00 ppm (C7-C17) and 66.29 ppm C1-C7 and 3.75 ppm C7-C17. Together, these
spikes more than doubled the volatile and semivolatile run averages. Later
comparisons to the continuous HC data suggest this bias is probably small.
4-7
-------
TABLE 4-3. ORGANIC MASS DATA FOR RUN 1
Sampling
location
Run time Sample Carbon fractions (ppm propane, dry)
(24-h) No. Time C^C, C7-C17 > C17
Total
mass
(TOM)
Main duct
1548-2012
Bypass duct
1548-2012
R1SS8
R1SS9
R1SS10
R1SS11
R1SS12
R1SS13
R1SS14
R1SS15
R1SS16
R1SS17
R1SS18
R1SS19
1557
1616
1645
1720
1739
1757
1815
1834
1852
1910
1930
2002
Run average:
R1SS8
R1SS9
R1SS10
R1SS11
R1SS12
R1SS13
R1SS14
R1SS15
R1SS16
R1SS17
R1SS18
R1SS19
1557
1616
1645
1720
1739
1757
1815
1834
1852
1910
1930
2002
69.54
10.24
9.74
6.24
7.24
7.49
66.29
7.
7.
7.
.99
.87
.49
9.24
7.62
18.08
1.41
41
62
62
1.30
Run average:
1.41
2.25
1.75
1.50
1.62
1.30
2.60
1.73
2.00
0.37
0.50
0.00
0.37
0.50
3.75
0.25
0.62
0.62
0.75
0.75
0.87
0.43
0.22
0.12
0.25
0.11
0.11
0,37
0.25
0.12
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.19
0.39
19.35
0.01
1.93
4-8
-------
Table 4-3 shows that similar high spikes did not occur in the bypass
duct. This suggests that the spikes may be related to pyroclone coal
combustion or variation in organic content of the raw material. A direct tie
to solid or liquid waste feed combustion was not observed.
Table 4-4 shows the distribution of the TOM among the three fractions
measured 1n all runs. The distribution was similar for both ducts with most
of the mass 1n the volatlles fraction. The percent 1n the volatlles fraction
was 85 to 93 for the main duct and 75 to 100 for the bypass duct. The seml-
volatlle and nonvolatile fractions contributed about equally to the remaining
mass. The data for the bypass duct was more scattered than for the main duct,
which probably reflects a loss of precision In the measurements near detection
levels.
Table 4-5 presents the average TOM determined for each process condition.
No definite effect of waste burning on TOM emissions could be associated with
the three process conditions. However, the TOM levels 1n the main duct were
slightly higher during Runs 1 and 2 when the solid waste was fired In the
kiln. These higher emissions mostly reflect an increase 1n the mass of the
volatiles fraction. This Increase 1s likely related to conditions In the
pyroclone or preheater, not to solid waste burning. A similar trend was not
noted In the bypass duct where the effects of combustion 1n the kiln should be
most evident. The coal feed rate to the pyroclone during Runs 1 and 2 was
higher than during the other three runs.
The higher TOM levels measured in the main duct versus the bypass duct
are probably associated with two factors. One 1s the evolution of organic
compounds from the raw material 1n the preheater. Very little organic matter
Is likely to be left in the calcined limestone by the time it reaches the
kiln; therefore, the bypass duct emissions would not be similarly affected.
The second factor 1s organic emissions from coal combustion 1n the pyroclone,
which also does not affect the bypass duct emissions. Both of these factors
probably contribute to the main duct organic compound emissions; however, the
test data were not sufficient to separate these effects.
4-9
-------
TABLE 4-4. CARBON MASS DISTRIBUTION
Sampling
location
and
Run No.
Main duct
1
2
3
4
5
Average carbon
mass (dry, ppm propane)
Ci-C7
18.08
11.30
8.19
8.29
8.07
C7-C17
0.87
0.80
0.59
0.68
0.56
> C17
0.39
0.54
0.90
0.39
0.50
Total
mass
(TOM)
19.35
12.64
9.68
9.36
9.12
Distribution
percent of total
Ci-C7
93
89
85
89
88
C?~Ci7
4
6
6
7
6
mass
> C17
2
4
9
4
5
Bypass
1
2
3
4
duct
1.173
1.63
2.09
1.51
1.86
0.19
0.09
0.03
0.00
0.05
0.01
0.44
0.42
N
0.26
1.93
2.16
2.54
1.51
2.17
90
75
82
100
86
10
4
1
0
2
1
20
17
0
12
N = Negative quantity measured; value assumed to be 0.00.
4-10
-------
TABLE 4-5. AVERAGE CARBON MASS FOR EACH TEST CONDITION
Process
condition
Liquid plus
solid waste
(Runs 1 & 2)
Coal only
(Run 3)
Liquid waste
(Runs 4 & 5)
Average
C,-C7
14.69
8.19
8.18
Main duct
carbon mass (dry,
Cr •> r
7~^17 ' L17
0.84 0.47
0.59 0.90
0.62 0.45
ppm propane)
Total mass
16.00
9.68
9.24
Average
Ci-C,
1.68
2.09
1.68
Bypass duct
carbon mass (dry, ppm
C7-C17 > Ci7
0.14 0.23
0.03 0.42
0.03 0.13
pjropjame)
Total mass
2.05
2.54
1.84
-------
4.2.1.2 HC and TOM Emissions in the Bypass Duct--
Table 4-6 shows the results for HC and TOM emissions measured in the
bypass duct. The results are shown for each of the three process conditions.
The TOM results are presented as the mass in each of three fractions described
earlier and as total mass. HC results are shown for both the hot and cold
monitoring systems.
These results for the bypass duct do not provide any definitive conclu-
sions about relationships between HC or TOM levels and other parameters. This
is because of the low levels of organic emissions encountered during the
test. HC levels were at or below the level they could be accurately quanti-
fied, and thus differences between runs or between the hot and cold HC are not
significant. To further complicate the data interpretation, HC levels in the
ambient air were also high enough to have contributed significantly to the
measured duct levels. Most of the gas at the sampling point in the bypass
duct is ambient dilution air used to cool the gas stream. Thus, much of the
measured HC levels may have originated with the ambient air (0.6 ppmv). A
nitrogen check on the monitor sampling lines was conducted by introducing pure
nitrogen into the sample lines at the probe and monitoring for HC. This check
showed about 0.2 ppmv, a bias which contributed to the measured levels.
The TOM levels measured in the bypass duct were also low, but slightly
higher than the measured HC. Most of the TOM was in the Ci to C7 compound
range. Again, it was not possible to reach definitive conclusions with these
data, except that burning waste versus coal in the kiln did not result in any
large increase in HC or TOM emissions.
•
4.2.1.3 HC and TOM Emissions in the Main Duct--
Table 4-6 shows the resi/lts for HC and TOM emissions measured in the main
duct, presented in the same manner as for the bypass duct. The measured
values were higher than those for the bypass duct and were, therefore, more
amenable to evaluation of the emission levels. The nitrogen bias check of the
main duct sampling line showed slightly higher results than for the bypass
duct sampling line, but the values In this case were well below the sample
values.
4-12
-------
TABLE 4-6. HC AND TOM EMISSIONS
BYPASS DUCT
Process
condition
Liquid plus
solid waste
Coal only
Liquid waste
Test
run
1
2
3
4
5
Cl-C7
mass
1.7
1.6
2.1
1.5
1.9
ND = Not detected.
Process
condition
Liquid plus
Coal only
Liquid waste
Test
run
1
2
3
4 .
5
mass
18.1
11.3
8.2
8.3
8.1
TOM. ppmv dry
mass
0.19
0.09
0.03
ND
0.05
MAIN DUCT
TOM. ppmv dry
mass
0.87
0.80
0.59
0.68
0.56
as propane
> C17
mass
0.01
0.44
0.42
ND
0.26
as propane
> C17
mass
0.39
0.54
0.90
0.39
0.50
Total
mass
1.9
2.2
2.5
1.5
2.2
Total
mass
19.4
12.6
9.7
9.4
9.1
HC, ppmv dry
as propane
Hot Cold
0.8 0.6
0.7 1.8
1.1 1.1
0.1 0.7
0.6 0.7
HC, ppmv dry
as propane
Hot Cold
16.1 11.5
16.6 11.8
9.7 6.8
10.6 6.7
9.6 6.4
4-13
-------
Figure 4-1 shows the TOM, hot HC, and cold HC values generally maintained
a relatively consistent relationship to each other for all five test runs.
The TOM and hot HC values agreed well with each other, indicating these two
measurement techniques provided similar results for organic compound emis-
sions. The cold HC results were consistently lower than the other two mea-
TMres, with the cold HC being 70% of the hot HC. Loss of organic compounds in
the condensate trap on the cold HC sampling line is the most likely explana-
tion for the lower cold HC values. As was the case for the bypass duct
measurements, the TOM consisted primarily of Ct to C7 compounds. About 90% of
the TOM was found in this fraction.
As was discussed i.n Section 4.2.1.2 for TOM emissions in the bypass duct,
no change in HC emissions could be associated with the three test conditions.
The higher values during Runs 1 and 2 are probably associated with the pyro-
clone operating conditions as discussed in Section 4.2.1.
4.2.2 Destruction and Removal Efficiency
The ORE of monochlorobenzene (MCB) spiked Into the solid waste drums was
measured during Runs 1 and 2. MCB was chosen as the compound to spike because
it ranked high among Appendix VIII compounds as difficult to incinerate. The
choice of MCB, however, complicated interpretation,of the ORE results because
the data indicate formation of MCB in the pyroclone. Formation of MCB is dis-
cussed below, followed by discussion of alternative methods to estimate the
ORE for MCB.
The data indicate that the formation of MCB in the pyroclone was related
to high levels of benzene as a PIC (product of incomplete combustion) and to
the chlorine input level to the kiln. Table 4-7 shows the emission concen-
trations measured for these two PICs and the chlorine input levels for each
test run. First considering the main duct data, Table 4-7 shows that the
benzene concentrations were relatively high during all five test runs.
Benzene 1s known to be ,a common PIC of fossil fuel combustion, and its
presence 1s likely related to the coal combustion 1n the pyroclone. The MCB
concentration was also relatively high except during Run 3 when no chlorinated
waste was burned. The MCB concentrations were also similar for Runs 4 and 5,
4-14
-------
COMPARISON OF TOM AND HC LEVELS
20
18
H C Ji®
1 6 -|:X:S
14-
E
a 12H
»>
g 10H
8-
6-
4-
2-
0
1
r
3
Test Run
Figure 4-1
TOM
HotHC
Cold HC
v\
\
-------
TABLE 4-7. MCB PIC FORMATION
Main duct
concentrations
Process
condition
Liquid plus
solid waste
Coal only
Liquid waste
Test
run
1
2
3
4
5
Chlorine Input
(lb/h)
194
248
None detected
217
215
(nq/L)
Benzene
600
700
490
500
450
MCB
44
72
5
66
62
Bypass duct
concentrations
(nq/L)
Benzene
28
63
15
7
9
MCB
10
15
0.4
0.5
0.7
4-16
-------
when chlorinated waste was burned, but no MCB was spiked into the waste (as
for Runs 1 and 2 when MCB was spiked into the waste). Figure 4-2 shows more
clearly how the MCB concentration in the main duct related to the level of
chlorine input. As the level of chlorine input increased, the concentration
of MCB increased. These data show that most of the MCB in the main duct was
formed as a PIC and was not just the result of lack of destruction of the MCB
spiked into the waste during Runs 1 and 2.
Data for the bypass duct support a different conclusion. The benzene and
MCB concentrations were both much lower than in the main duct, and the MCB
concentrations did not relate to the chlorine input levels. Rather, the MCB
concentrations in the bypass duct appear to be related to the presence of MCB
in the waste feed. The concentrations were over an order of magnitude higher
when the MCB-spiked waste was burned than during the other runs, which
included the chlorindated liquid waste in Runs 4 and 5. These data show that
the MCB in the bypass duct reflected residual MCB that was not destroyed, and
that MCB levels were not significantly related to PIC formation. Some MCB may
have formed as a PIC, as in the main duct, but it appears that the lower
benzene levels kept the PIC levels small compared to the levels of residual
MCB from waste destruction.
Several alternative methods to calculate ORE were considered. The common
approach is to use the total emission rate of MCB, main plus bypass duct, as
the MCB output in the ORE equation, regardless of whether the MCB was due to
PIC formation. This approach yields the result labeled as minimum ORE on
Table 4-8. The maximum ORE shown on Table 4-8 is calculated by attributing
all of the main duct emissions to PIC formation and using only the bypass duct
emissions as the output in the ORE equation. Direct evaluation of the data
only allows the conclusion that the actual ORE, defined as input MCB not
destroyed, is between the minimum and maximum values. Actually some of the
MCB in the main duct is probably related to lack of destruction.
Since neither the minimum or maximum values discussed above provided a
very precise understanding of the ORE achieved, an alternate method was
developed to provide a best estimate of the actual ORE. The basic assumptions
were that the bypass duct data provide the best measure of the input MCB that
4-17
-------
-U
I
c
c
Q)
O
C
O
O
GO
O
0
80
120
160
200
Chlorine Input, Ib/hr
240
Figure 4-2. MCB concentration vs. cMarine
-------
TABLE 4-8. ORE VALUES FOR MCB
ORE
M1n1muma
Maximum
Best estimate0
Test
run 1
99.993
99.9994
99.9958
Test
run 2
99.984
99.9986
99.9914
Average
99.989
99.999
99.9936
a Calculated using main duct plus bypass duct
MCB emission rates.
Calculated using bypass duct MCB emission
rates, only. Main duct MCB emissions assumed
to be from PIC formation.
c Calculated as defined in Appendix A-6.
4-19
-------
was not destroyed (little influence from PIC formation) and that the
undestroyed MCB at the kiln exit was apportioned between the main and bypass
ducts relative to the split of total gas flow. The calculations for the
alternate method required back calculation from the bypass duct measured stack
gas flow to the bypass flow at the kiln exit, by correcting for dilution air,
and a combustion mass balance calculation of the total combustion gas flow at
the kiln exit (see Appendix A-6 for example calculations). The ratio of total
gas flow at the kiln exit to the portion of the flow split to the bypass duct
could then be determined. The output value for MCB in the ORE equation was
then calculated as this gas flow ratio times the measured bypass MCB emission
rate. This method yielded a best estimate of the actual ORE of 99.9936% for
MCB spiked into drums that were fed at the gas exit end of the kiln. This
estimating method does not provide an accurate determination of ORE as
required during trial burns.
4.2.3 Emissions of PICs
This section covers the qualitative screening analysis for PICs and the
quantitative analysis for dioxins and furans.
4.2.3.1 Organic Emissions Screen-
Qualitative screening analyses of the VOST Method 0030 and Method 0010
samples were conducted to characterize the organic compounds emitted as
products of incomplete combustion (PIC) in both the main and bypass ducts.
The GC/MS analyses were targeted to identify about-110 compounds listed in EPA
Methods 624 and 625, commonly called the priority pollutants. The analyses
were qualitative in that sample quantities were based on average response
factors and not on specific standards. Tables 4-9 and 4-10 present the
concentrations of compounds detected by these analyses. A blank entry on
these tables indicates that the compound was not detected; detection levels
are on the order of a few nanograms.
4-20
-------
TABLE 4-9. BYPASS DUCT PIC SCREENING DATA
. __^_— — ^— — — — —
Process condition:
Compound
Volatile compounds
Acetone
Benzene
1,1-Dichloroethene
Ethyl benzene
Methylene chloride
Methyl ethyl ketone
Monochlorobenzene
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
Trichloroethene
Tri ch 1 orof 1 uoromethane
•^•^•^•^^^^^•••••••MBMMM^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Stack gas
Liquid +
solid waste
Run 1 Run 2
28 63
2 3
1 2
68
10 15
2 1
22 21
2 1
2 2
concentrations,
Coal
only
nq/L
Liquid
Run 3 Run 4
61
15
2
1
17
1
1
6
1
5
7
4
1
1
5
waste
Run 5
9
1
8
1
1
1
8
1
Semivolatile compounds
B1s(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 8 130 92
4-21
-------
TABLE 4-10. MAIN DUCT PIC SCREENING DATA
Stack gas concentrations, nq/L
Process condition:
Compound
Liquid +
solid waste
Run 1 Run 2
Coal
only
Run 3
Liquid waste
Run 4 Run 5
Volatile compounds
Benzene 600 700 490 500 450
Bromoform 1
Ethyl benzene 100 130 74 85 77
Methylene chloride 66 89 260 54 64
Monochlorobenzene 44 72 5 66 62
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 1
Tetrachloroethene 622
Toluene 580 650 470 420 440
THchloroethene 1 3
Trichlorofluoromethane ' 35
Semivolatile compounds
Anthracene 10
B1s(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate 16
Dlbenzofuran 25
D1-n-butyl phthalate
Dlphenyl 11
15
28
6
11
62
45
92
4-22
-------
Table 4-9 shows that a few PICs at relatively low concentrations were
emitted from the bypass duct. The volatile species identified were all com-
pounds commonly detected in combustion gas effluents. Very few semivolatile
compounds were identified. The data show a general scatter from run to run,
with only one trend evident. Higher levels of MCB during Runs 1 and 2 are
likely associated with spiking of this compound into the solid waste feed
during these runs. Section 4.2.2 provides further discussion of MCB emis-
sions. Benzene and toluene concentrations were also higher during these two
runs.
Table 4-10 shows the PICs detected in the main duct. The array of com-
pounds found here was similar to that found in the bypass duct, but individual
compound levels were higher. Benzene, toluene, and ethylbenzene were found at
the highest concentrations and showed little variation in concentration from
run to run. Benzene and toluene are known to be common PICs resulting from
fossil fuel combustion and are, therefore, likely associated with coal combus-
tion in the pyroclone.
These data also indicate that MCB was formed as a PIC. The formation was
related to high levels of benzene and to the level of chlorine input to the
kiln, and not to the spiking of MCB in the waste during Runs 1 and 2 (see
Section 4.2.2).
Table 4-11 is a comparison of the PICs measured in the main and bypass
ducts to the PICs historically detected in stack gases from hazardous waste
incinerators. The incinerator data include the most common PICs that were
detected during tests at eight incinerators. Comparison of any individual
compound concentrations should be made with caution, since only one kiln test
is compared to a series of incinerator tests. However, Table 4-11 does
indicate that many compounds are common to combustion of waste in both kilns
and incinerators. It also shows that the concentrations of PICs 1n both cases
are generally in the same range.
4.2.3.2 Dloxins and Furans—
Table 4-12 shows the concentrations of dloxins and furans measured in the
main and bypass ducts. Generally, little difference was noted between runs
4-23
-------
TABLE 4-11. COMPARISON OF KILN AND INCINERATOR PICs
Range of concentrations. nq/L
PIC
Benzene
B1s(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Bromod 1 chl oromethane
Bromoform
Chloroform
Dlbenzofuran
Di bromochl oromethane
Olphenyl
Ethyl benzene
Hexachlorobenzene
Methylene chloride
Methyl ethyl ketone
Monoch 1 orobenzene
Naphthalene
o-N1trophenol
Phenol
Tetrachloroethylene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethylene
Tr1 ch 1 orof 1 uororaethane
Kiln,
main duct
450-700
15-62
25-28
11
74-130
54-260
5-72
2-6
440-650
1-3
Kiln,
bypass duct
7-62
8-130
1-3
1-17
1-68
1-2
5-22
1-2
1-5
Incinerators4
12-670
3-92
1-24
1-1300
1-12
1-7
2-27
1-10
5-100
25-50
4-22
1-9
2-25
1-2
"Performance Evaluation of Full-Scale Hazardous Waste Incinerators,
Volume 2," EPA-600/2-84-181b, PB85-129518, November 1984.
4-24
-------
TABLE 4-12. DIOXIN/FURAN CONCENTRATIONS
Concentration, nq/dscm
Homo log
Dloxins
TCDD
PeCDD
HxCDD
HpCDD
OCOD
Total dioxlns
Furans
TCOF
PeCDF
HxCDF
HpCDF
OCDF
Total furans
kin _ M«+- ~i_.k_.»4..
Run 1
ND
0.007
0.041
0.10
0.260
0.4F
0.046
0.081
0.03
ND
0.071
0.23
TJ
Main duct
Run 3
ND
ND
0.10
0.13
0.21
0.44
0.066
0.084
0.069
0.10
0.23
0.55
Bypass duct
Run 4
0.16
0.21
0.46
0.52
0.48
rr
1.1
1.1
0.90
0.71
0.43
4.2
Run 1
ND
0.017
0.044
0.082
0.17
OT31T
0.48
0.21
0.15
0.04
0.12
1.0
Run 3
ND
ND
0.043
0.07
0.25
or
0.043
0.024
0.046'
0.04
0.16
OT3F
Run 4
ND
ND
0.020
0.085
0.27
or
0.25
0.10
0.12
0.069
0.13
or
4-25
-------
except the levels of both the dioxins and furans were higher in the main duct
during Run 4. An explanation for this increase 1n concentration was not
found. The concentrations in Table 4-12 are on the low side of the range of
concentrations that have been measured previously for hazardous waste
incinerators.
4.2.4 Total Organic Carbon Concentrations in Raw Materials Feed
Composite samples of the raw materials feed (i.e., crushed limestone and
shale) were collected and analyzed for total organic carbon (TOC), in order to
allow comparison to the total hydrocarbon emissions from the stack. Samples
were analyzed by combustion in a LECO furnace using Texas A&M Geochemical and
Environmental Research Group SOP-8907. Appendices A-l and A-5 describe the
sampling and analysis methods, respectively.
The TOC, or organic carbon, input rates were compared to the stack
emission or output of organic carbon based on the HC measurements. Percent
TOC 1n the feed was converted into a mass input rate of carbon, while the hot
HC emission rate (as ppm propane) was converted into carbon output rates. The
ratio of carbon input to carbon output ranged from 27 to 44, as shown in
Table 4-13. The carbon input was sufficient to potentially account for the HC
output from the stack. Appendix B-4 provides copies of the laboratory
analysis data.
4.3 CT AND NOX EMISSIONS
This section discusses the data collected on inorganic compound
emissions. The discussion is divided into two sections on chloride and
nitrogen oxide emissions.
4.3.1 Chloride Emissions
Table 4-14 shows the chloride data for both ducts assuming all chloride
measured is emitted as HC1. The concentrations of HC1 were relatively low,
and the total emission rates were less than 4 Ib/h for all test runs. The
lower values for the bypass duct compared to the main duct are partly the
result of the greater dilution of the gas stream 1n the bypass duct.
4-26
-------
TABLE 4-13. ASH GROVE TOC/THC COMPARISONS
Raw meal
TOC in feed rate TOC Input rate in raw meal
Run feed (%) (ton/h) (g/hr)(ton/h)
1 .10 98 89,000 0.0980
2 .10 96 87,200 0.0960
3 .04 95 34,500 0.0380
4 .07 95 60,400 0.0665
5 .06 97 52,800 0.0582
Run
THC
(ppm)a
Cone.
(ug/L)
Stack flow
(dscm/min)
Emission
(g/hr)
1 16.1 24 1500 2100
2 16.6 25 1460 2200
3 9.7 15 1490 1300
4 10*6 16 1510 1500
5 9.6 14 1460 1200
ppm as propane, carbon fraction alone.
Overall Summary
Input Output Ratio
Run (g/hr) (g/hr) (input/output)
1 89,000 2100 42
2 87,200 2200 40
3 34,500 1300 27
4 60,400 1500 40
5 52,800 1200 44
4-27
-------
TABLE 4-14. CHLORIDE EMISSIONS
oo
Process
condition
Liquid plus
solid waste
Coal only
Liquid waste
Test
run
1
2
3
4
5
Main duct
Concentration
(ppmv)
3.7
2.4
1.6
7.1
11.1
emissions
Emission rate
(lb/h)
1.1
0.7
0.5
2.2
3.3
Bypass duct
Concentration
(ppmv)
0.05
0.29
0.29
0.38
a
emissions
Emission rate
(Ib/hr)
0.008
0.04
0.04
0.05
a
Total
emission
rate
(lb/h)
1.1
0.7
0.5
2.3
a
a Data not available.
-------
Table 4-15 compares the emission rate with the input chloride rate and shows
that about 99% of the input chlorine was removed from the gas stream before it
exited the stack. The chlorine reacts with raw material in the process to
form chloride salts, mainly potassium chloride. However, the chloride
emission rates did not appear to relate to the chloride input level.
The sampling and analysis method used for this program was developed to
measure HC1 emissions from incinerators. The method actually measures the
amount of chloride ions collected in impingers located behind a filter and is
typically considered adequate to determine the emissions of HC1 from inciner-
ators. Apparently, 1n these tests of cement kilns, an alternate plausible
argument is that the measured chloride ion in the sampling train impingers is
attributed to ammonium chloride, not HC1. Table 4-16 shows data on potassium,
ammonium, and chloride ions in the impingers that support this argument.
The analysis of the impinger solutions for potassium ion show that it is
unlikely that potassium chloride particles pass the filter. Formation of some
potassium chloride would be expected due to the high potassium content of the
raw material fed to the kiln relative to the chloride levels present. How-
ever, no significant potassium ion concentration was found in the sampling
train impingers. Thus, any potassium salts in the stack gas must be solid
particles that are captured on the filter in the sampling train. If salt
particles do not penetrate the filter, then the ammonium ion levels shown on
Table 4-16 must have passed the filter in vapor or gaseous form. Ammonia or
ammonium chloride are two possibilities.
Any ammonia present in the gas stream would easily pass through the
filter and be captured in the impingers. This is one possible way to explain
the presence of ammonium ion in the impingers. However, ammonia and HC1 are
highly reactive, and if both were present in the gas stream, they would likely
react to form ammonium chloride. A more reasonable explanation for the
presence of ammonium ion in the impingers is that ammonium chloride vapor
passes the filter. The vapor pressure of ammonium chloride at the filter
4-29
-------
TABLE 4-15. CHLORIDE REMOVAL EFFICIENCY
Process
condition
Liquid plus
Solid waste
Coal only
Liquid waste
Test
run
' I
3
< J
Chloride
input
(lb/h)
194
248
None detected
217
215
Chloride
emissions
(lb/h)
1.1
0.7
0.5
2.3
a
Chloride
removal
efficiency
(*)
99.4
99.7
-
98.9
a
a Data not available.
4-30
-------
TABLE 4-16. COMPARISON OF CHLORIDE LEVELS WITH POTASSIUM AND AMMONIUM LEVELS
IN THE HC1 SAMPLING TRAIN IMPINGERS
Test
run
1
f 2
CO
4
5
Chloride
(mg)
8.9
6.0
4.2
18.3
28.3
Main
Potassium
(mg)b
< 0.7
< 0.5
< 0.6
< 0.4
< 0.7
duct
Ammonium
ion (mg)
33
14
17
21
39
Bypass duct
Percent of
chloride
that may
be NH,, Cl
100
100
100
100
100
Chloride
(•9)
0.14
0.77
0.76
1.03
a
Potassium
(mg)b
< 0.1
< 0.3
< 0.4
< 0.6
< 0.4
Ammonium
ion (mg)
0.07
0.07
0.10
0.04
0.07
Percent of
chloride
that may
be NHH Cl
100
20
30
10
a
a Data not available.
b Potassium concentration determined to be < 1.0 mg/L in impinger solutions. Analytical results are in
Appendix B-4.
-------
temperature of 250°F is 0.089 nrni of mercury.2 This vapor pressure can account
for the existence of up to 120 ppm of ammonium chloride, in the gas phase, in
the sampled stream. Thus, it is possible for sufficient gas phase ammonium
chloride to pass through the filter at levels well above those measured in the
impingers. The percent of the measured chloride levels in the impingers that
could be present as ammonium chloride is shown on Table 4-16.
The form of the chloride in the sampling train impingers does not
necessarily indicate its form in the stack gases. Literature sources indicate
that ammonium chloride is a crystalline solid which sublimes without melting
and, is almost completely dissociated to ammonia and HC1 in the vapor
phase.3 At average stack temperatures (300°F) and stack gas concentrations
(2 to 10 ppm HC1; equivalent to 3 to 15 ppm Nh\Cl), all of the NHHC1 would be
in the vapor phase and, therefore, almost entirely dissociated to ammonia and
HC1. The dissociated ammonia and HC1 in the hot stack gases may recombine to
NhVCl after the stack gases are emitted and cooled in the atmosphere.
4.3.2 Nitrogen Oxide Emissions
Nitrogen oxide (NOX) emissions were measured in the main and bypass ducts
using Ash Grove's continuous monitor.' Table 4-17 lists the average NOX values
for each test run along with pyroclones and kiln operating temperatures. NOX
concentrations in the main duct were generally lower than those measured in
the bypass duct. No relationship was evident between NOX concentrations and
pyroclone or kiln operating temperature.
2 International Critical Tables, Volume III, First Edition, McGraw Hill
Publishers, p. 207, 1928.
3 Sources Include:
Inorganic and Theoretical Chemistry, J. W. Mellor, Volume II,
p. 566.
Goldfinger, L., and G. Verhaegen, "Stability of Gaseous Ammonium
Chloride Molecule,: J. Chemical Physics, 50(3), 1467 (1969).
4-32
-------
TABLE 4-17. ASH GROVE NOX DATA AND OPERATING TEMPERATURES
Test run
1
2
3
4
5
Main duct)
NOX (ppm)
412
443
512
415
529
Bypass
duct
NOX (ppm)
312
723
1174
472
765
Pyroclone
temp. (°F)
1600
1620
1620
1600
1600
Kiln
exit gas
temp. (°F)
1970
1880
1940
a
1831
a Data not available.
4-33
-------
APPENDIX A
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS METHODS
A-l
-------
This appendix contains information concerning the sampling and analytical
procedures used during the test at the Ash Grove precalciner kiln. Informa-
tion 1s presented as follows:
Content Page
A-l Sampling Procedures A-5
1.0 Exhaust Gas Testing A-7
2.0 Raw Meal Sampling A-26
3.0 Electrostatic Precipitator Dust Sampling A-27
A-2 Sample Handling and Analysis A-29
1.0 Method 0010 Samples A-31
2.0 Method 0030 Samples A-36
3.0 HC1 Train Samples A-38
4.0 Raw Materials Feed Sample Handling A-38
A-3 Procedures for Volatile Organics Analysis A-39
1.0 Glassware Preparation A-42
2.0 Reagents A-43
3.0 Sample Traceability and Chain-of-Custody A-44
4.0 Sample Receipt A-44
5.0 Preparation of Calibration Standards, Spiking Solu-
tions, Matrix Spikes,and Matrix Blanks A-47
6.0 Preparation of Samples, Blanks, Check Samples,
Matrix Spikes, and Replicates A-50
7.0 GC/MS Analysis of Water Samples by Purge and Trap.... A-52
8.0 GC/MS Analysis of VOST Samples A-62
9.0 Data Interpretation A-65
10.0 Quality Control A-67
11.0 Modifications from SW-846 Methods A-68
A-4 Semivolatile Organics Analysis and PCDD/PCDF Determination A-71
1.0 Glassware Preparation A-73
2.0 Sorbent Cleanup and Preparation A-74
3.0 Extraction of Field Samples for Semi volatile Organic
Compounds A-77
4.0 Extract Concentration and Column Cleanup for Semi-
volatile Organic Compounds A-82
5.0 Preparation and Use of Calibration Standards, Method
Internal Standards (Surrogates), and Recovery
Internal Standards A-86
6.0 GC/MS Analysis of PCDD/PCDFs A-92
A-5 TOC Analysis Procedures A-103
A-6 Data Reduction/Interpretation A-115
1.0 CEM Data Reduction A-117
2.0 Total Organic Mass Data Reductions/Interpretation.... A-117
3.0 ORE of Monochlorobenzene A-118
A-3
-------
APPENDIX A-l
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
A-5
-------
APPENDIX A-l
SAMPLING PROCEDURES
Test objectives were met by the sampling and subsequent analysis of
exhaust gas streams, raw meal feed, and waste feeds. This section summarizes
the sampling procedures used during the test burn. Preparation of the
sampling equipment and sampling procedures 1s addressed. Equipment calibra-
tion 1s briefly addressed; the Project QAP more specifically addresses
equipment calibration. Sample handling (transport and storage) and sample
analysis procedures are addressed 1n Section A-2.
1.0 EXHAUST GAS TESTING
The following sampling systems were used to collect exhaust gas samples
during the test:
• Method 0010 sampling train—Used to determine PCDD/PCDF emission
concentrations (during run 1 of test Condition A, run 3 of
Condition B, and run 4 of test Condition C), to determine an organic
mass fraction, and to screen for a specific array of semlvolatlle
organ1cs.
HC1 train—Used to determine HC1 emission concentrations. Ammonium
and potassium 1on concentrations were also determined 1n these
samples.
• VOST—Used to screen for a specific array of volatile organlcs.
Also used to determine POHC emission concentrations during test
Condition A.
• Field GC system—Equipped with FID. Used to determine an organic
mass fraction.
• Orsat—Method 3 sampling system used to determine 02 and C02
emission concentrations using an Orsat analyzer.
• Continuous emission monitors (CEMs)—Used to monitor hot and cold
THCs using Modified Method 25A systems equipped with FIDs. CO, C02,
and 02 emission concentrations also measured following EPA Reference
Methods 10, 3, and 3A.
These sampling systems are further defined 1n the subsequent discussion.
A-7
-------
1.1 Method 0010 Train
The Method 0010 sampling train was used to measure carbon fractions
greater than C17 (I.e., organic mass fraction) and to define specific semi-
volatile organlcs (i.e., organic screen analysis). The carbon fraction was
determined by gravimetric analysis; semivolatile organics were determined by
6C/MS analysis. During three test runs, this train was also used to measure
PCDOs/PCDFs.
The sampling procedure consists of 1sokinst1cally sampling a volume of
the exhaust gas (usually no less than 70 ft3 corrected to dry standard condi-
tions). In general, the sampling procedures parallel those specified in
40 CFR 60, Methods 1 through 5, for particulate analysis.
The design of the Method 0010 sampling train was based on the apparatus
described in SW-846, Method 0010 (September 1986 edition). The train consists
of a stainless steel nozzle, a heated, borosillcate glass probe liner, and a
borosllicate filter. The control module used to control the gas sampling rate
and monitor the stack gas parameters contains a leakless vacuum pump; a dry
gas meter; an orifice meter; and the appropriate valves, gauges, temperature
controllers, and associated hardware. The implngers and their contents are
described below:
The first impinger is a spiral condenser to cool the sample gas.
The second impinger is an MRI-des1gned XAD module containing 70 g of
XAD.
The third Impinger is an empty modified 6BS to catch any carryover
from the first two Implngers.
The fourth impinger is a GBS and will contain 100 ml of double dis-
tilled in glass H20.
The fifth Impinger is an empty modified GBS.
The sixth Impinger is a modified GBS, containing approximately 200 g
of blue Indicating silica gel.
All glass-to-glass connections are made from threaded glass and Teflon
ferrules. Schematics of the train are shown in Figures Al-1 and Al-2.
Calibration—The sampling equipment will be calibrated, checked for
proper operation, and cleaned for use prior to arrival on-site.
As a minimum, the following equipment will be calibrated:
1. Dry gas meter/orifice
2. Stack temperature thermocouple
3. Filter oven thermocouple
A-8
-------
Qiinrlz/Glass Liner
\
1 honnocouplo
Nozzle—
Reverse - Typo
Pilot Tube
Cyclono (Optional)
Potentiometer Filler
1. Condenser.
2. XAD module, 70 g XAO.
3. Modified Greenburg-Sralth. empty.
4. Greenburg-Smlth, 100-mL double-distilled H20.
5. Modified Greenburg-Smlth, empty.
6. Modified Greenburg-Smlth, silica gel.
Figure Al-1. Diagram of MM5 train.
-------
inerrnocsuoie
We, I
Submersible
Pump
Woter In
Wer«r Cut
XAO-2
Figure Al-2. MM5 condenser and XAD resin cartridge.
A-10
-------
4. Thermocouple and pyrometer for gas meter
5. Probe nozzles
6. P1tot tube (by comparison to pltot tube 1n wind tunnel)
Copies of all calibration data are offered in Appendix C. The
calibration procedures used are from the "Quality Assurance Handbook for Air
Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III—Stationary Source Specific
Methods," USEPA 600/4-77-027b.
All surfaces 1n the sampling train that came Into contact with the sample
gas stream were thoroughly cleaned. The cleaning procedure 1s discussed in
more detail later 1n this section. To minimize the potential for
contamination of sampling train glassware, all glassware components were
sealed with aluminum foil prior to being packed for storage and transport.
All remaining sampling train components were cleaned and prepared In
accordance with EPA Method 5 procedures.
Sample collection—Sample collection, Including leak-checking, was
conducted 1n accordance with EPA Method 5 procedures. The samples were col-
lected 1sok1net1cally over a complete traverse of each exhaust duct (I.e., the
main predpltator and bypass preclpltator exhaust ducts). Twenty traverse
points were sampled using four sample ports located across the width of each
duct. A minimum of 70 ft* was collected at a sampling rate of
- 0.75 ft3/m1n. Two-hour samples were collected.
Sample recovery—At the end of a test run after the final leak check, the
sampling train was disassembled Into two parts, the probe and the sample box,
which were then transferred to the field laboratory for recovery. The Inlet
to the sample box was covered, and both ends of the probe were sealed to
prevent sample loss and contamination. In a designated section of the field
laboratory, sample components were recovered from the sample box and the
nozzle. The sample component from the probe was recovered in a clean,
ventilated area. All liquid sample components were transferred to tared
bottles and rewelghed after recovery to verify that no losses occurred during
transport to the laboratory. Sample components were recovered as follows.
• Container 1—Filter. Use Teflon-coated or stainless steel forceps
to recover the filter; place the filter In the labeled glass petrl
dish.
Container 2—XAO-2 resin. Cap the XAO-2 resin module with threaded
glass plugs (Teflon ferrules).
Container 3—Front-half rinse. Rinse and brush the probe nozzle,
probe, and all glassware up to and Including the front-half of the
filter with methanol, methanol/methylene chloride, and toluene;
three time each. Retain the rinse.
Container 4—Back-half Hnse. Rinse all glassware from the filter
back-half up to the XAD resin cartridge Including the condenser with
A-ll
-------
ethanol, methanol/methylene chloride, and toluene; retain the
rinse.
• Container 5—Condensate. After weighing, collect the first, third,
and fourth impinger condensates, then rinse with a known volume of
water, adding it to the condensate container. Record the total
final volume of condensate. Rinse all impingers three times with
methanol, methanol/methylene chloride, and toluene, and add these
rinses to the condensate container.
Cleaning glassware—All glass parts of the train including the empty XAD
sorbent tube were cleaned in MRI's laboratory prior to use as follows:
1. Scrub and soak in hot "Alconox" soapy water.
2. Hot water rinse.
3. Distilled water rinse.
4. Methanol.
5. Methanol/methylene chloride rinse.
6. Toluene rinse.
7. Bake in 100°C oven until dry.
8. Cap ends in methanol/methylene chloride rinsed aluminum foil (dull
side in).
9. Store.
Note: Chromic acid rinse to remove grease was not required because all
fittings were designed as greaseless and were never to be used with grease.
Blank train—A blank train was fully assembled in the field, heated, and
then a train blank sample recovered using the same procedures as a normal
sample recovery.
1.2 HC1 Sampling Train
HC1 present in exhaust gas was collected using an HC1 sampling train.
The sampling procedure consisted of sampling a predetermined volume of stack
gas using the proposed sampling procedures specified in EPA's "Draft Method
for the Determination of HC1 Emissions from Municipal and Hazardous Waste
Incinerators" (USEPA, QAD, July 1988), adapted for use with an M5 train.
The HC1 sampling train utilized a heated quartz fiber disc filter and
glass borosilicate probe. A flow control module was used to permit control
and monitoring of the gas sample. The module contains a leakless vacuum pump;
a dry test meter; a surge tank; and the appropriate valves, gauges,
temperature controllers, and associated hardware. The impingers and their
contents are described on the following page.
A-12
-------
• The first and second GBS Impingers contain 100 ml of 0.1 M H2SO^
each. These Impingers were used to collect condensate and HC1.
The third and fourth modified Impingers contain 100 ml of 0.1 N
NaOH. These Impingers were used to absorb C12, which, 1f present,
could damage the sample pump.
The fifth modified 1mp1nger was filled with blue-Indicating silica
gel.
All glass-to-glass connections were glass and Teflon. A schematic of the
HC1 train 1s shown 1n Figure Al-3.
Calibration—The HC1 sampling equipment was calibrated, checked for
proper operation, and cleaned for use prior to arrival on-s1te.
As a minimum, the following equipment was calibrated:
1. Dry gas meter/orifice
2. Stack temperature thermocouple
3. Filter oven thermocouple
4. Thermocouple and pyrometer for gas meter
5. Probe nozzles
6. Pitot tube (by comparison to pitot tube 1n wind tunnel)
The calibration procedures used are from the "Quality Assurance Handbook
for A1r Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III—Stationary Source Specific
Methods," USEPA 600/4-77-027b, and/or from the previously referenced EPA draft
method for the determination of HC1 emissions.
All surfaces in the HC1 sampling train that came Into contact with the
sample gas stream were thoroughly cleaned. The cleaning procedure 1s
discussed in more detail later 1n this section. To minimize the potential for
contamination of sampling train glassware, all glassware components were
sealed with aluminum foil prior to being packed for storage and transport.
All remaining sampling train components were cleaned and prepared 1n
accordance with appropriate EPA reference procedures (I.e., EPA Method 5).
All glassware, rinse bottles, and associated apparatus used for 1n-f1eld
sampling and recovery were thoroughly cleaned and conditioned. All sample
containers were glass with Teflon-Hned Hds or Nalgene and Were rinsed with
distilled water.
Cleaning glassware—All glass parts of the train were cleaned 1n MRI's
laboratory prior to use as follows:
1. Scrub and soak 1n hot water with Alconox.
A-13
-------
I
H-»
«k
HEATED
pnooE
7
STACK WALL
HEAT
TAPE
PURGE
GLASS WOOL
PLUG
THREE-WAY
GLASS
STOPCOCK
THERMOMETER
Sampling (Figure 1C)
Vonllng (Figure IB)4
Purging (Figure 1A)
SURGE
TANK
VACUUM
GAUGE
NEEDLE
VALVE
M-3.
of the
-------
2. Rinse in hot water.
3. Rinse 1n distilled water.
4. Rinse in acetone.
5. Cap ends in aluminum foil (dull side in).
Sample bottles—All sample bottles required for recovery of HC1
condensate were polyethylene or glass bottles. The sample bottles were rinsed
with distilled water.
Sample collection—Sample collection, Including leak-checking* was
conducted 1n accordance with the procedures described in the EPA draft proto-
col, "Draft Method for the Determination of HC1 Emissions from Municipal and
Hazardous Waste Incinerators." Even though this draft method 1s directly
applied to Incineration systems, the proposed methods may be equally applied
to other Industrial combustion systems, such as the precaldner cement kiln.
Samples were collected at a single point in each duct (I.e., in the main
preclpltator and the bypass predpltator exhaust ducts). A sampling rate of
approximately 10 L/min was maintained throughout a 2-h sample period.
Sample recovery—At the end of the test after the final leak check, the
sample train was taken to the laboratory to recover the sample. The samples
from the HC1 train were recovered as follows:
• Container 1—Condensate, HC1, and Hnsate. Combine contents of
Impingers 1 and 2. Rinse these impingers with water, and add the
Hnsate to the combined implnger volume.
NOTE: The contents of Impingers 3 and 4 can be discarded. To
protect sampling equipment, these Impingers were used to collect any
C12 present in the sample volume.
Blank train—A blank train was fully assembled 1n the field, heated, and
then a train blank sample recovered using the same procedures as a normal
sample recovery.
1.3 Volatile Organics Sampling Train
Volatile organics, Including the volatile POHC (Introduced during test
Condition A), were collected from exhaust gases using a VOST. VOST samples
were collected from a single source in each duct (I.e., the main and bypass
predpltator exhaust ducts). The VOST was placed in a common port with the
CEM/THC sampling probe to accommodate the number of available sample ports.
The VOST method involved collecting a 20-L exhaust gas sample at a flow
rate of approximately 0.5 L/min. The gas sample was cooled to approximately
20°C by passage through a water-cooled condenser, and volatlles were collected
on a pair of sorbent resin traps. Liquid condensate was collected in a catch
flask placed between the two resin traps. The first resin trap (front trap)
A-15
-------
contained approximately 1.6 g of Tenax, and the second trap (back trap)
contained approximately 1 g each of Tenax and petroleum-based charcoal, 2:1 by
volume.
A diagram of the VOST component arrangement 1s presented 1n Fig-
ure Al-4. The sample was passed from the probe to a valve train, a water-
cooled glass condenser, a sorbent cartridge containing Tenax (1.6 g), an empty
catch flask for condensate removal, a second water-cooled glass condenser, a
second sorbent cartridge containing Tenax and petroleum-based charcoal, a
silica gel drying tube, a rotameter, a sampling pump, and a dry gas meter.
The gas pressure during sampling and for leak-checking was monitored by
pressure gauges which were 1n line with and downstream of the silica gel dry-
ing tube.
The probe was constructed of borosilicate glass in a stainless steel
outer sheath. The temperature of the probe was maintained at approximately
140°C, which was low enough to ensure a resin temperature of 20°C.
An Isolation valve was used to isolate the VOST apparatus from the sample
probe. The isolation valve consists of a greaseless stopcock and sliding
Teflon plug. The charcoal tube valve was also used to direct a hydrocarbon-
free gas (charcoal-filtered air) to the inlet of the sample train. This gas
was used to prevent contamination during leak-check procedures.
The condensers were of sufficient capacity to cool the gas stream to 20°C
or less prior to passage through the first sorbent cartridge.
The sorbent cartridges for the VOST are of the 1ns1de-1ns1de (I/I) con-
figuration In which only a single glass tube 1s used for each of the two
tubes. The second sorbent cartridge was placed in the sample train so that
the sample gas stream passes through the Tenax layer first and then through
the charcoal layer. The sorbent cartridges were glass tubes with approximate
dimensions of 10 cm (long) by 1.6 on l.d. The resin was held in place by
Teflon-coated stainless steel screens and clips at each end of the resin
layer. Threaded end caps were placed on the sorbent cartridges after packing
to protect the sorbent from contamination during storage and transport.
The metering system for VOST consisted of vacuum gauges, a leak-free
pump, a rotameter for monitoring the gas flow rate, a dry gas meter (low
volume) with 2% accuracy at the required sampling rate and related valves and
equipment. All sample transfer lines used with the VOST up to and including
the second resin cartridge were Teflon or glass with connecting fittings that
are capable of forming leak-free, vacuum-tight connections without the use of
sealing grease.
Calibration—All VOST equipment was calibrated, checked for proper
operation, and cleaned for use prior to arrival on-site. The gas meter and
condenser thermocouple were calibrated before and after the test.
The gas meter was calibrated against a wet test meter. The thermocouple
was calibrated against a mercury-ln-glass thermometer.
A-16
-------
Purge
Valve
Latex Tubing
Slack S
Gas In
Teflon Tubing
Tenax/Charcoal
Trap
Fittings A. B, C, and D
ore Viron O-ringed
Nickel Plated Fittings
Silica Gel
Remote Ice Bath
with Submersible
Pump
Figure Al-4. Volatile organic sampling train (VOST).
Sampling
Console
-------
Glassware cleaning—An glass parts of the VOST train were cleaned as
follows:
• Washed with Alconox and hot water.
• Rinsed with tap water.
• Rinsed with distilled water.
Oven-dried at 150°C for 2 h.
• Capped with aluminum foil or Teflon caps until used.
Tenax preparation—The sorbent tube cartridges were packed with Tenax and
conditioned by flowing, organic-free nitrogen (30 mL/m1n) through the resin
while heating to 190°C for at least 3 h.
During the thermal conditioning, the Tenax cartridges are Installed in a
specially designed manifold which permits the nitrogen purge from the traps to
be individually monitored by an FID. The conditioning is continued until the
FID response indicates the traps are clean (less than 5 ppb total hydrocarbon
as propane). If after 24 h of purging the trap 1s still contaminated, 1t is
discarded.
Used Tenax cartridges are thermally conditioned by the method described
above.
Charcoal (SKC petroleum base or equivalent)—Procedures for recondition-
ing charcoal are the same as those described for Tenax above.
Sample cartridges—"Primary" VOST cartridges were packed with 1.6 to
1.8 g of prepared Tenax, and "secondary" cartridges will be packed with
approximately 1 g each of prepared Tenax and prepared petroleum-based charcoal
(SKC Lot 104 or equivalent), 2:1 by volume. The packed cartridges were condi-
tioned as described above.
After the tubes were conditioned, the tubes were capped and placed into a
steel can which was then sealed for shipment. The can contained a small
amount of charcoal for shipment. During each test, each tube was marked
directly with a label.
VOST sample collection—Sample collection was conducted 1n accordance
with procedures described 1n the USEPA document SW-846, Method 0030, except as
noted below. Samples were collected from each exhaust duct at a single sample
point for three 40-m1n sample periods during each test condition.
The following are exceptions and/or additions to the procedures In the
above-referenced document.
1. After collection of the 20-L sample, the two sorbent cartridges were
removed from the train, capped at the ends, and placed into the metal trans-
port can which contains charcoal. The cans were stored and transported in
A-18
-------
Insulated containers packed with ice to maintain temperature of the tubes at
4'C at all times.
2. Field blanks, trip blanks, and other conditioned (clean) sorbent
tubes are stored and transported as described above for the sample tubes.
The volatile organic sample train will be assembled as shown 1n Figure
1-4. A leak check of the train will be made at 250 mmHg with the three-way
valve at the Inlet from the probe to the condenser closed. After all leak
checks, the vacuum will be released by admitting charcoal-filtered air through
the three-way stopcock.
The probe will next be purged with stack gas by drawing stack gas through
the probe via the three-way stopcock with a pump. After this purge of the
probe, the sample 1s collected following these steps:
t
Record the dry gas meter reading.
• Position the three-way stopcock to connect the condenser with the
probe.
• Turn on the pump and open the coarse metering valve.
• Operate the train at the sampling rate of 0.5 L/min for the next
40 m1n.
Collect readings as required by the VOST data sheet each 5 m1n
throughout the run.
• Ensure the sampling rate remains constant throughout the run.
• Ensure the temperature of the gas entering the first sample tube
remains below 20 *C throughout the run.
• Ensure the probe remains above 140*C throughout the run.
• At the end of the sampling period, turn off the pump and the three-
way valve.
After the sample 1s collected, the final meter volume 1s recorded and a
final leak check done. The cartridges just used are removed and replaced with
fresh cartridges. No cleaning of the condenser or other VOST equipment 1s
required between subsamples. A new pair of traps 1s Installed 1n the system,
and sampling 1s continued as described above.
One set of field blanks was collected during each run. These samples
were obtained by removing the end caps from a pair of traps and exposing them
to the atmosphere while placing a pair of sample traps Into the VOST train and
again while removing the sample traps from the VOST train.
A set of trip blanks was retained at each duct (two sets per run) for
analysis from the set of tubes used during the trial burn.
A-19
-------
VOST sample recovery—The VOST traps removed from the sample train are
Immediately capped. A label 1s placed on the end cap to Indicate the sample
run number for ease 1n Identification. However, each trap tube 1s permanently
marked with a unique Identification number. This Identification number is
recorded on the data form and sample traceablHty form to ensure proper sample
Identification. This trap number is used as the primary sample Identification
number.
The sealed trap is replaced 1n the trap storage/transport can, which is
kept in a coole** with 1ce during the duration of the test and during storage
on-s1te.
1.4 Field GC
The field GC will be utilized to Identify Cl through C17 carbon
fractions. This 1s necessary in obtaining an organic mass value.
GC samples were split directly off the hot THC pump exit, placing the GC
sampling lines under positive pressure. The entire sampling system was leak-
checked as a unit. Line and valve purging was sufficient to reduce/eliminate
contamination from previous samples.
Prior to test run 1, it was discovered that an isothermal run program was
inappropriate; oxygen present in the sample gas and higher temperatures acted
on the GC columns to generate false high readings. A temperature-programmed
run was developed and then utilized through the test. This program was
defined as follows:
Dual columns: 30 m DB-1, 5.0 uM megabore; column flow and temp-
erature were adjusted with the oven temperature at
100°C to 250°C at 20°C/min. Samples were held for
6 rain at 250°C.
Analyzer: Shimadzu GC with dual FID
Carrier gas: He, 7 to 10 mL/min
Sample loops: Approximately 1 ml
Two propane standard concentrations were analyzed each day. A 4.98-ppm
propane standard was analyzed prior to each test run to check Instrument
linearity. A 9.788-ppm propane standard was analyzed prior to and after each
test run to generate an average response factor. The average response factors
were then utilized to calculate the C1-C7 and C7-C17 carbon fractions.
Several aliquots of a C17 it: a C7 solution were Injected into the propane
standard gas stream to determine appropriate retention times for carbon
separation. The following ranges were determined:
C1-C7 Main Duct: 0-153s
Bypass Duct: 0-141.5s
A-20
-------
C7-C17 Main Duct: 154-583s
Bypass Duct: 142-572s
To shorten sampling time, some of the quality assurance (QA) samples
(I.e., Initial and final nitrogen blanks, propane standards, and ambient air
samples) were not run through the entire temperature program. Early 1n the
test, 1t was determined that there were no apparent high boiling point
compounds present 1n the QA samples. Therefore, a second QA sample could be
analyzed Immediately following baseline recovery of the first, without
qualitatively Interfering with the analysis.
It should be noted that GC sampling times were reported by the operator
prior to actually Injecting the sample. Reported times may be off by up to
10 m1n. Also, a 10-ft length of sampling line was used to transfer sample gas
to the field GC. A low flow rate was maintained through this line; therefore,
GC sampling periods do not correspond directly (I.e., minute for minute) with
hot THC sampling periods.
1.5 Orsat Analysis
An Integrated, multipoint gas sample was taken from each exhaust duct
during each test run using a modified EPA Reference Method 3 (40 CFR 60). The
sampling procedures consisted of extracting a sample at a constant rate Into a
leak-free Mylar bag, which was subsequently analyzed for percent 02 and C02 by
volume on a dry basis using an Orsat gas analyzer.
Figure Al-5 1s a schematic of the sampling system. The sample was taken
from a connection at the exhaust end of the Method 0010 meter orifice. This
sampling method provides a sample from which part1culate and moisture have
already been removed in the M5 train and automatically provides a multipoint
and integrated sample. The Integrated sample was taken over the entire 2-h
Method 0010 sampling period.
The modified apparatus is the same as described in USEPA Method 3 for
Integrated sampling except that the probe and condenser are part of the
Method 5 train (see Figure 1-5).
Large diameter flexible tubing of sufficient length (4 to 8 ft) is
usually connected to the orifice meter outlet to exhaust sample gas so that 1t
1s vented away from the train operator. This tubing will not Interfere with
the orifice meter output and will ensure that no ambient air 1s drawn into the
Method 3 apparatus.
The sampling system leak checks required 1n Method 3 was conducted prior
to sampling. These Included:
1. Leak checks of bags.
2. Sampling system leak check.
A-21
-------
Quartz/Glass Liner
Thermocouple
Nozzle—
Reverse - Type
Pitot Tube
Cyclone (Optional)
Potentiometer \ Filter
T/C T/C Fine Control
Valve
Flexible
Tubing
Bag
M-M Set gomun(l) MSM
Figure Al-5.
MM3 sampling train (using a Method 5 train as
primary sampling device).
A-22
-------
All bags were leak-checked in the laboratory prior to being shipped to
the field. The sampling train was leak-checked before and after each run as
required in Method 3.
1.6 Continuous Emission Monitoring
Samples were collected at each exhaust duct to measure CO, C02, 02» and
hot and cold THC.
1.6.1 THC Measurement—
THC emissions were measured using EPA Modified Method 25A (MM25A)
sampling systems, equipped with FIDs. This THC measurement was compared to an
organic mass measurement (subsequently discussed).
Heated and unheated THC emission concentrations were measured using the
MM25A systems. This method essentially measures hydrocarbons expressed in
terms of propane.
To measure heated THC concentrations, the following changes were made to
the Method 25A system:
The entire sample system from probe to detector was heated to
> 300°F (150°C).
• A Beckman 402 THC analyzer or equivalent was used.
Propane was used as the calibration gas.
• EPA protocol 1 cylinder standards of 5, 20, and 100 ppm propane in
nitrogen were used.
In measuring unheated THC concentrations, the following changes were made
to the Method 25A system:
• An Ice-cooled water knockout trap was used to remove condensables.
• An unheated Teflon sample line was used to conduct the sample
through a stainless steel pump to the FID.
Propane was used as the calibration gas.
• EPA protocol 1 cylinder standards of 5, 20, and 100 ppm propane in
nitrogen were used.
Figure Al-6 Illustrates the general configuration of the THC gas sampling
system. At each sample point (I.e., exhaust duct), combustion gas was sampled
using a probe with a sintered metal filter. Immediately after extraction, the
gas sample was split into "heated" and "unheated" sample fractions. The
heated sample fraction was transferred to a hot THC analyzer via a heated
sample line. The sample line, along with 1n-l1ne tees and valves, was
maintained at over 300°F (150°C). Pumps were used to maintain constant
purging of all sampling lines.
A-23
-------
ESP Eat
DM
HeMTnoKlLim
•CokTUn*
Figure Al-6. THC and CEM equipment layout associated with each exit duct.
-------
The unheated sample fraction was passed through a condensate trap (i.e.,
a modified GBS 1mp1nger placed in an ice bath) which was located adjacent to
the sample port. Using a Teflon sample line, the sample was then transferred
to the cold FID, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and oxygen analyzers.
During the test the condensate trap was operated at "contact" and
"noncontact" conditions. Contact conditions were characterized by the sample
gas bubbling through collected condensate. Noncontact conditions were
achieved early 1n the day's test and were characterized by the sample gas
passing through the condensate trap without contact with collected condensate.
The THC monitors Included a Beckman 400 series model and a comparable MRI
In-house designed model. A data logger was used to record all necessary
Information. The monitors were spanned and zeroed prior to and Immediately
following each run with 99.26 ppm propane, NBS-traceable EPA protocol 1 gas,
and prepurlfled nitrogen. A linearity check was conducted in the field prior
to Initiating the first test run using 49.09 ppm propane and 20.35 ppm propane
NBS-traceable EPA protocol 1 gases. Monitor response times also were checked
(90* of full scale).
To determine the potential for organlcs to leach out of sample lines, a
nitrogen blank sample was analyzed at the conclusion of each test run.
Figure Al-6 illustrates the location of the nitrogen blank sampling line
associated with each duct. As Illustrated 1n the figure, nitrogen was
Introduced at the CEM/THC sample probe where 1t was Immediately split into
heated, and unheated sample fragments. The split nitrogen blank was then
transferred via the heated and unheated sample lines to the field GC, the hot
and cold THC analyzer, and the CEM systems.
After each run, ambient air was collected and analyzed for hot and cold
THC concentrations. These data offer Information on potential THC bias
because of ambient conditions.
1.6.2 Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Dioxide, and Oxygen Measurement--
Figure Al-6 (previously offered) llustrates the schematic layout of the
CEM system. As illustrated, CEM samples were split from the cold THC MM25A
sample line. In the MM25A system, Immediately after extraction, the gas
sample was passed through a condensate trap. The sample was then transferred
via TFE Teflon sample line and split for C02, 02, CO, and cold THC analysis.
C02 was independently monitored and used to volume-correct the CO reading to
account for the C02 removed. A Horiba Model PIR-2000S nondlsperslve Infrared
(NDIR) analyzer was used to measure C02. 02 was also independently monitored
and used to correct the CO reading to 7% oxygen concentrations. A Horiba
pMA-200 paramagnetic sensor and a Teledyne Model 320AX polarographic sensor
were used to measure 02. Each manifold maintained constant purge of the two
cold TFE sample lines.
Total CO concentration was determined using Horiba Model PIR-2000L
NDIRs. After a CO sample was split from the cold THC MM25A sample line, it
vas passed through an ascar1te/sH1ca gel cartridge containing approximately
200 g of ascarite and 20 g of silica gel. The ascarlte trap removes carbon
dioxide, which Is an Interference to the CO monitor, and the silica gel
removes the last traces of moisture prior to the monitor. The sample fraction
Is then pumped to the NDIR analyzer.
A-25
-------
Zero drift is determined by checking the zero calibration before and
after each run and comparing the two. Calibration drift is determined by
checking the span gas calibration before and after a given period of time
(usually the same time as the zero drift is done). The response time is
determined by adding a calibration gas while the instrument is at the zero
calibration in the end of the probe and determining the length of time for the
instrument to reach 90% of the corresponding span value. The calibration
error (usually referred to as the linearity check) is done by zeroing and
spanning the instrument and then adding a midlevel calibration gas and
comparing the instrument value with the real gas value. Zero and calibration
drift must be less than ±3% of the span value, while the calibration error
must be less than ±5% of the calibration gas value.
The performance checks for the analyzers are summarized below:
Zero drift: 3% of span
Span drift: 3% of span
Linearity checks: 5% of cylinder gas value
Leak checks: < 4% of normal flow, before and after each run
Nominal gas concentrations:
Linearity
THC~span 100 ppm propane 50, 20 ppm
CO—800 ppm 400, 200 ppm
CO 2—14% 7%
02--14* 7%
2.0 RAW MEAL SAMPLING
The raw feed (e.g., crushed limestone, clay, etc.) was sampled once every
30 min during each test run. These grab samples were composited into a single
sample for each run for TOC analysis. A metal trier was used for the collec-
tion of the raw feed samples.
Sample containers for raw feed (e.g., crushed limestone, clay, ore, etc.)
samples were prepared 1n the laboratory prior to the test. All bottles used
for samples were made of polyethylene or glass. The sample bottles were
cleaned as follows, prior to shipment to the field:
• Rinse copiously with tap water.
• Soak in hot, Alconox-soapy water.
• Rinse with hot water.
Rinse with distilled water.
• Rinse with reagent-grade methanol.
Rinse with methanol/methylene chloride.
• Rinse with toluene.
A-26
-------
• Let dry, cap, and place in storage container.
3.0 ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATOR DUST SAMPLING
Dust discharged form the main and bypass electrostatic predpltators
(ESPs) was sampled at the end of each run. These samples were archived for
future analysis, if necessary.
A-27
-------
APPENDIX A-2
SAMPLE HANDLING AND ANALYSIS
A-29
-------
APPENDIX A-2
SAMPLE HANDLING AND ANALYSIS
The following sections briefly describe the procedures employed during
the analysis of the samples collected during this project. These procedures
cover the analysis of all emission (exhaust) samples and raw meal feed
samples.
1.0 METHOD 0010 SAMPLES
The following sections summarize the procedures utilized 1n analyzing
Method 0010 samples for estimates of semivolatile compounds, quantitation of
dloxins and furans, and gravimetric analysis to combine with GC/FID data for
total organic mass.
1.1 Sample Handling
All samples were sealed, labeled, and stored in Insulated containers in
the field and during transport. All samples that were to undergo organic
analysis were stored on 1ce in the field and during transport. Upon receipt
in the laboratory the samples were removed from the Insulated containers and
were placed 1n cold storage (< 4'C). Each of the samples included the
following fractions:
1. Filter
2. Sorbent trap
3. Front-half organic rinse
4. Back-half organic rinse
5. Condensate (first and second 1mp1nger contents and rinse)
1.2 Sample Analysis
Figure A2-1 presents a schematic of the analytical scheme of the samples
for semlvolatHes, PCDDs/PCDFs, and gravimetric analyses. Prior to
extraction, each component was spiked with method Internal standards
(surrogates). The PCDD/PCDF surrogates are listed 1n Table A2-1. The
semivolatile surrogates Included D4-2-chlorophenol and 010-pyrene.
Each train component was triple-extracted using methylene chloride,
methyl t-butyl ether, and toluene. The solvent fractions generated through
the extraction and concentration process were then ultimately combined,
concentrated to a 10-mL final volume, and split Into.analytical aliquots.
A-31
-------
XAD
Spike with Surrogate
Extract with
Methylene Chloride
Filter
XAD v
Extract with
Methyl t Butyl Ether
Filter 1
XAD f
Extract with
Toluene
Solvent ^
Extract
Solvent
Extract
Solvent ^
Extract
Concentrate
Concentrate
Concentrate
* Filter, front-half, back-half,
and condensate extracted as
defined for XAD. Triple
condensate volumes from
each component extraction
are then combined.
Combine All
Concentrates
Concentrates to
lOmL Final Volume
2.5 ml Concentrate
Cleaned Up by
8290, Analyzed
by 8290 for Totals
by Homologue
Figure A2-1. Sample analysis flow.
A-3Z
-------
TABLE A2-1.
LIST OF ANALYTES, STANDARDS, AND SURROGATES
FOR DIOXIN/FURAM ANALYSES
Analyte
Compounds in
calibration
standard
Surrogatea (method
internal standard)
GC/MS
Internal standards
Tetra-CDD
Tetra-CDF
Penta-CDD
Penta-CDF
Hexa-CDD
Hexa-CDF
Hepta-CDO
Hepta-CDF
2,3,7,8-TCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PCDF
1,2,3,4,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
i3C12-2,3,7,8-TCDD
»3C12-2,3,7,8-TCDF
>3C12-1,2,3,7,8-PCDD
»3C12-1,2,3,7,8-PCDF
»3C12-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
i3Cl2-l,2,3,5,7,8-HxCDF
»3C,2-l,2,3,4,6f7,8-HpCDD
i3C,2-l§2, 3, 4,6,7,8-HpCDF
»3C12-1,2,3,4-TCDD
-
»3C12-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
OCDD
OCDF
Octa-CDD
Octa-CDF
>3C12-OCDD
a Added to sample prior to extraction and used for quantltatlon of dloxlns/furans
in sample.
b Added to extract at time of injection into GC/MS.
A-33
-------
TABLE A2-2. COMPOUNDS MONITORED DURING GC/MS SCREEN FOR
SEMI-VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
1. N-Nitroso-d1methyl aniline
2 o-P1co!1ne
3. Styrene
4. B1s(2-chlorophenol)ether
5. Phenol
6. 2-Chlorophenol
7. N-Decane
8. N-N1troso-DI-N-propylamine
9. l,3-D1chlorobenzene
10. l,4-D1chlorobenzene
11. P-Cymene
12. l,2-D1chlorobenzene
13. B1s(2-chloroisopropyl)ether
14. Hexachloroethane
15. Nitrobenzene
16. Isophrone
17. 2-Nitrophenol
18. 2,4-Dlmethyl phenol
19. B1s(2-chloroethoxy)methane
20. 2,4-Dichlorophenol
21. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene
22. Naphthalene
23. a-Terpineol
24. N-Dodecane
25. 1,2,3-Trlchlorobenzene
26. Hexachloro-l,3-butad1ene
27. 4-Chloro-3-methyl phenol
28. Hexachlorocyclopentadlene
29. 2,4,6-Trlchlorophenol
30. 2,4,5-THchlorophenol
31. 2-Chloronaphthalene
32. Dlphenyl
33. Dlphenyl ether
34. 2,6-D1n1trotoluene
35. Dimethyl phthalate
36. Acenaphthylene
37. Acenaphthene
38. 2,4-Din1trophenol
39. Dlbenzofuran
40. 4-N1trophenol
41. 2,4-D1n1trotoluene
42. 2-Naphthylamine
43. N-Hexadecane
44. Fluorene
45. 4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
46. Dlethyl phthalate
47. 4,6-D1n1tro-2-methyl phenol
48. Dlphenylamlne
49. l,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne
50. N-N1troso-d1phenylamine
51. 4-Bromophenyl-phenyl ether
52. Hexachlorobenzene
53. Dlbenzothlophene
54. Pentachlorophenol
55. Phenanthrene
56. Anthracene
57. Carbazole
58. Di-N-butyl phthalate
59. N-Eicosane
60. Fluoranthene
61. Benzldine
62. Pyrene
63. Benzyl butyl phthalate
64. Tetracosane
65. Chrysene
66. 3,3'-D1chlorobenz1d1ne
67. Benz[a]anthracene
68. B1s(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
69. D1-N-octyl phthalate
70. Benzo[b]fluoranthene
71. Benzo[kjfluoranthene
72. Benzo[ajpyrene
73. Triacontane
74. D1benz[a,h] anthracene
75. Benzo[g,?v]perylene
76. Tetradecane
77. Octadecane
78. Docosane
79. Hexacosane
80. Octacosane
81. Indeno[l,2,3,-c,d]pyrene
82. 2,3,6-THchlorophenol
A-34
-------
The Method 0010 samples from test runs 1, 3, and 4 were split for
semlvolatlle organlcs analysis, PCDD/PCDF determination, and gravimetric
analysis. Samples from the blank train and test runs 2 and 5 were split for
semivolatile organic* analysis and gravimetric analysis.
A 2.5-mL to 5.0-mL aliquot was separated for the semivolatile organic
screen. A 2.5-mL aliquot was separated for PCDD/PCDF determination, and a
5.0-mL aliquot was separated for gravimetric analysis. Detailed Standard
Operating Procedures are included 1n Appendix A-4.
1.2.1 Sample Preparation and Analysis for Semivolatile Organics--
The semi volatile (SV) extraction procedures for rinses and condensates
were adopted from SW-846, Methods 0010 and 3510 (separatory funnel
extraction). The SV extraction procedures for the XAD and filter components
were adopted from SW-846, Methods 0010 and 3540 (Soxhlet extraction). The
extracts did not undergo column cleanup, because an organic screen was
required.
SV analysis was conducted following SW-846, Method 8270, guidelines.
This method is a capillary column full-scan GC/MS method applicable to a
variety of semivolatile compounds. Table A2-1 lists the compounds screened in
the SV analysis. Calibration checks were completed by daily standard
verification (±30X). Quantification was accomplished by the internal standard
method, using a relative response factor of 1.0.
1.2.2 Sample Preparation and Analysis for PCDD/PCDFs—
The final 2.5-mL aliquot for PCDD/PCDF analysis was solvent-exchanged to
hexane and cleaned up according to SW-846 Method 8280 and analyzed for tetra
through octa PCDO and PCDF congener groups. Samples were analyzed by high
resolution gas chromatography mass spectrometry (HRGC/MS), using Draft ASME
method 8290, "Analytical Procedures to Assay Stack Effluent Samples and
Residual Combustion Products for PolychloHnated D1benzo-p-d1oxins (PCDD) and
PolychloHnated Dlbenzofurans (PCDF)." A 60-m x 0.25-mm DB-5 fused silica
capillary column (FSCC) was utilized.
The levels of dioxins and furans were calculated by comparison of the
response samples to calibration standards (listed 1n Table A2-1). Isomer-
speclfic quantltatlon was not completed; total concentrations of each congener
group were determined. Congeners were tabulated (by comparison to the
appropriate response factor determined from the calibration curve. Table A2-1
lists the analytes, standard compounds, and surrogates used in PCDD/PCDF
analysis.
1.2.3 Sample Preparation for Gravimetric Analysis—
Semlvolatile and nonvolatile sample extraction were performed following
the procedure given in "POHCs and PICs Screening Protocol" (Southern Research
Institute), Section III.C. As mentioned in Section 5.1, all solvent rinses,
filter, and XAD were combined and extracted with methylene chloride, again
with methyl t-butyl ether, and a third time with toluene.
A-35
-------
The methylene chloride, t-butyl methyl ether, and toluene extracts from
the train components were combined and gravimetrically analyzed without
deviation in accordance with the procedure in Section III.F. of "POHCs and
PICs Screening Protocol." The precision and accuracy of duplicate analyses
were based on two criteria:
Duplicate sample weights were to be within ±20% of the average
sample weight.
• The difference between replicate weights were to be < 0.1 mg (the
required extent of accuracy).
A sample could fail the first test but still be within the limits of
required accuracy; hence a sample was reanalyzed only if it did not pass the
second test.
The respective method blank was subtracted from each sample. The
remainder was then multiplied by a numerical factor to obtain the total ug per
sample. Dividing by the dry standard sample volume allowed for yg/L
calculation based on the air sampled. To obtain the ppm propane equivalent,
it was assumed that half of the sample molecular weight had no FID response;
thus ppm propane was calculated as follows:
(yg of sample/L of air sampled)«(0.5)-(24.1 yl_ per ymol of gas/44 y propane
per ymol propane)
2.0 METHOD 0030 SAMPLES
Volatile compounds present in stack gases were collected on Tenax and
Tenax/charcoal sorbent cartridges using a volatile organic sampling train
(VOST). Methods 5040 and 8240 in SW-84.6, third edition, describe in detail
procedural steps required to desorb VOST cartridges and analyze the effluent
gas stream for volatile organic compounds. An SOP is also provided in Appen-
dix A-3 that basically follows Methods 5040 and 8240, but only addresses the
quantitation of one each POHC, surrogate, and internal standard. The VOST
samples were analyzed for the compounds listed in Table A2-3. Identification
of target analytes in the VOST samples was performed using the Target Compound
Analysis (TCA) procedure. The TCA program uses experimentally determined
retention times and response factors to locate and quantitate any target
analyte.
The contents of the sorbent cartridges were spiked with an internal stan-
dard and thermally desorbed for approximately 10 min at 180°C with organic-
free nitrogen or helium gas (at a flow rate of 40 ml/min), bubbled through a
tower to impinger water desorbed from the cartridges. Target analytes were
trapped on an analytical adsorbent trap. After the 10-min desorption, the
analytical adsorbent trap was rapidly heated to 180°C with the carrier gas
flow reversed. Volatile organic compounds were desorbed from the analytical
trap and vented directly to the gas chromatograph. The VOCs were separated by
temperature-programmed gas chromatography and detected by low-resolution mass
spectrometry. Concentrations of the POHC were calculated using the internal
standard technique. PIC compounds were quantitated using a single-point
calibration and by internal standard method using RRFs equal to 1.0.
A-36
-------
TABLE A2-3. CEMENT KILN SEMIQUANTITATIVE SCREEN TARGET LIST FOR
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS
Acetone
Acroleln
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromod i ch1oromethane
Bromoform
Carbon tetrachloride
2-Chloroethyl-vinyl ether
Chloroform
01bromoch1oromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
l,2-D1chloroethane
l,l-D1chloroethene
t-l,2-D1chloroethene
1,2-01chloropropane
t-l,3-D1chloropropene
c-l,3-D1chlorpropene
01ethyl ether
Ethylbenzene
Methylene chloride
Methyl ethyl ketone
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrach1oroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trlchloroethene
THchlorofluoromethane
A-37
-------
3.0 HC1 TRAIN SAMPLES
The contents of the condensate 1mp1ngers from the HC1 trains were
analyzed for HC1 using 1on chromatography, ASTM Method D4327-84.
Concentrations as low as 0.1 mg/L can be determined.
In the analysis, a filtered aliquot of the sample 1s Injected into an ion
chromatograph. The sample is pumped through three different ion exchange
columns and into a conductivity detector. The first two columns, a precolumn
and separator column, are packed with a low-capacity anion exchanger. Ions
are separated based on their affinity for the exchange sites of the resin.
The last column 1s a suppressor column that contains cation exchange resin in
the hydrogen form. The suppressor column reduces the background conductivity
of the eluent to a low or negligible level and converts the anions in the
sample to their corresponding acids. The separated anions in their acid form
are measured using an electrical-conductivity cell. Anions are identified
based on their retention times compared to known standards. Quantltation is
accomplished by measuring the peak height or area and comparing it to a
calibration curve generated from known standards.
The HC1 samples were also analyzed for potassium using inductively
coupled plasma-atomic emissions spectrometry (ICP-AES). The samples were
analyzed for ammonium using gas chromatograph/mass spectrometry-selective ion
measurement (GC/MS-SIM).
4.0 RAW MATERIALS FEED SAMPLE HANDLING
Raw materials feed samples were analyzed for total organic carbon (TOC)
by Galbraith Laboratories of Knoxvllle, Tennessee.
Samples were analyzed using Galbraith Procedure Nos. ME-7 and ME-6 for
carbon, hydrogen, and nitrogen analysis. Galbraith Procedure No. E6-5 was
utilized for the coulometric determination of inorganic carbon.
A-38
-------
APPENDIX A-3
PROCEDURES FOR VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS
A-39
-------
The analytical procedures used by MRI for volatile organic analysis are
based on EPA SW-846 Method 5040, "Protocol for Analysis of Sorbent Cartridges
from Volatile Organic Sampling Train" and Method 8240, "Gas Chromatography/
Mass Spectrometry for Volatile Orgam'cs." Any deviations from these SW-846
methods normally used by MRI are noted in the procedures.
A-41
-------
1.0 GLASSWARE PREPARATION
1.1 FIELD SAMPLING
1.1.1 All containers for field sampling are glass and have Teflon-
lined caps or Teflon-lined septa. Samples for volatile organic analysis (VOA)
are protected from light as much as possible to avoid degradation of halo-
genated compounds. Amber bottles are useful for this purpose. If amber bot-
tles are not used, the sample bottle can be wrapped with foil or stored in a
container to protect from light.
1.1.2 When possible, 40-mL screw cap septum vials (VOA vials) that
have been manufacturer precleaned according to EPA protocol are used for the
collection of water and waste samples. However, these vials are currently
available in clear glass only. If contract specifications require amber VOA
vials, these must be prepared according to the procedure in Section 1.2.
1.1.3 Other containers may be required for VOA sampling and these
will be specified by the field programs crew chief prior to each burn. If
other containers are required, they are also be prepared according to the pro-
cedure in Section 1.2.
1.1.4 Water field blanks are prepared for each field sampling trip
by adding VOA water (see Section 2.1 for prep of VOA water) to clean VOA vials
and sending them to the field with the other containers. These field blanks
demonstrate that no contamination of samples has occurred due to ambient con-
ditions at the site or during shipment.
1.2 GLASSWARE CLEANING
1.2.1 Preparation of glassware to be used in the collection or prep-
aration of samples for volatile organic analysis (VOA) 1s performed 1n a
laboratory free from organic solvents other than methanol.
1.2.2 All glassware (amber VOA vials, sampling bottles, compositing
bottles, volumetric flasks, etc.) is prepared according to the following pro-
cedure:
1.2.2.1 Wash in hot soapy water using Micro (or equivalent)
and a clean brush.
1.2.2.2 Rinse thoroughly 1n tap water (3 x), deionized water
(3 x), and d1st1lled-1n-glass methanol (B&J or equivalent).
1.2.2.3 Any glassware that does not appear to be clean, i.e.,
does not "sheet" when rinsed with water or methanol, 1s cleaned by soaking in
concentrated sulfuHc add, then rinsed as in Section 1.2.2.2.
1.2.2.4 Allow the glassware to air dry and then place in a
clean glassware drying oven at - 110°C for at least 1 h.
A-42
-------
1.2.2.5 After removing bottles from the oven, allow to cool to
room temperature, then cap with Teflon lined Hds. If glassware 1s not used
Immediately, cover the open ends with methanol rinsed aluminum foil and store.
1.2.3 Rinse Teflon liners and Teflon-Hned septum thoroughly with
d1stilled-1n-glass methanol. Allow to either air dry or bake at - 110°C for
no longer than 1 h.
1.2.4 New reactivials and 2-dram screw cap vials are rinsed with
methanol and baked at "110°C for at least 1 h. After removing from the oven,
they are allowed to cool and then capped with Teflon lined Hds.
1.2.5 Syringes should be thoroughly cleaned with methanol. This is
done as soon as possible after use to avoid contamination of the syringe.
Syringes are not routinely baked because high temperatures will weaken the
adhesive used to affix the needle to the barrel.
2.0 REAGENTS
2.1 REAGENT WATER (VOA WATER)
2.1.1 Reagent water is defined as a water in which compounds that
interfere with the analytes are not observed at the method detection limit.
2.1.2 Reagent water is prepared by pouring M1111-Q (or equivalent)
through a carbon bed into a chromatography column. The column is maintained
at a temperature of approximately 50°C with a gentle flow of prepurifled
nitrogen. Other methods of generating reagent water can be found in SW-846
method 8240 "GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS."
2.1.3 Reagent water is used to prepare matrix spikes, field blanks,
and system blanks for the GC/MS system.
2.2 METHANOL
2.2.1 Only distilled-in-glass (pesticide quality, B&J or equivalent)
methanol is used for glassware prep, preparation of standards, and preparation
of samples.
2.2.2 Store methanol 1n an area not contaminated by solvent vapors.
2.2.3 Bulk methanol may be used for decontamination of bottles and
vials prior to disposal and decontamination of glassware prior to cleaning for
re-use.
2.3 TENAX AND TENAX/CHARCOAL TRAPS
2.3.1 VOST traps of tenax and tenax/charcoal are prepared by field
sampling personnel. Details on preparation of traps are available in the ap-
propriate field sampling standard operating procedures (SOP) documents.
A-43
-------
2.4 SCREENING AND BLANKS
2.4.1 To ensure that no contaminants are present in the reagents,
blanks of each matrix type are analyzed by the appropriate GC/MS method.
3.0 SAMPLE TRACEABILITY AND CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY
3.1 SAMPLE TRACEABILITY
3.1.1 Each sample taken in the field is given a unique number by
field personnel. In the case of Volatile Organic Sampling Train (VOST) sam-
ples and gas bags, this number is carried throughout field sampling and anal-
ysis. Water and waste samples are also given a unique number by field per-
sonnel. However, these samples are composited in the laboratory prior to
analysis. Afterwards, the sample composite is given a new number by labora-
tory personnel. A record of sample composition and their new numbers are
recorded in the appropriate laboratory notebook.
3.1.2 A record of who was responsible for each sample and where the
sample was during the sampling and analysis procedures is kept using the forms
in Figures A2-1 and A2-2.
3.1.2.1 Figure A2-1 is the form used by the field sampling
personnel. This form contains sampling information as well as the field
sample numbers. This form accompanies the samples from the time they are
taken in the field until their receipt by analytical personnel.
3.1.2.2 Figure A2-2 is the form used by analytical
personnel. This form is used to transfer samples within the analytical
sections or to instrument facilities.
3.2 CHAIN-OF-CUSTODY
3.2.1 In the event a contract requires chain-of-custody, the samples
are stored in a locked cold room which has restricted access. During the sam-
ple preparation or analysis, the samples must be within the sight of the per-
son who has custody, in a locked container, or in a container sealed with
evidence tape which has been appropriately signed and dated.
3.2.2 The forms in Figures A2-1 and A2-2 are appropriate for chain-
of -custody so long as this is noted on the form.
4.0 SAMPLE RECEIPT
4.1 Volatile samples are usually shipped daily from the field site.
These can be shipped by an overnight delivery service such as Federal Express
or by airport counter-to-counter service. The samples are shipped with suf-
ficient quantities of wet ice or "blue ice" to keep the samples cool. Dry ice
is not recommended for water samples due to freezing of the samples which
will, in turn, break the vials.
A-44
-------
HIDUEST nESEAttCIl INSTITUTE
KANSAS CITY, HISSOURI
-t>
en
1
liivonlory Oulol
(Sa»|tli> Container Laud)
1 1 1
I_J 1
n r~
_J i r~
i i i
i i i
I_J L_
MI
i i i
run
Inventory Clinch
CUtBBoiil a
iHVunlory DnlnC
(Sntnlu ConUlnur lnl.al)
J
1
L
i
i
i
i
i
r~
__r~
L
Inventory Clutch
Con»aul>
l-fl
I,,|
Figure A2-1. Sample traceability record.
-------
LABORATORY CHAU OF CUSTODY OR TRACIABILITY RECORD
C Chain of Custody Record
Project Number
Q Traceability Log
Date of Laboratory Check-In
"fl Location -
3 Container Type
•
Laboratory Samole Ho.
Jield Samole No.
® Type of
Custody
Sample
Description
•
•
Samoles
Office Storage L
—
-Amount of
Sample Removed
(give date)
acation
.
Comments
Laboratory/Area
Custody Off' ce
Sample Preparation.
Metals
GC/MS
Other
(Identify)
Relinquished by:
(signature)
Date/Time
Received by:
(signature)
Date/Time
Notebook Refereace Pages
Analyst Comments
Notebook No.
Figure A2-2
A-46
-------
4.2 Once the samples arrive, they are Inventoried and examined for
breakage as soon as possible. In the event the samples cannot be Inspected
right away, they are stored 1n a cold room 1n the shipping container until
such time as the Inspection can be accomplished.
4.3 The Inventory of the samples 1s performed 1n a volatile free labora-
tory and includes the following Items:
4.3.1 The temperature of the shipping container is observed. The
samples should still feel cool. If they are found to be above room tempera-
ture, this 1s noted either on the traceability sheet or in the appropriate
laboratory notebook.
4.3.2 The samples are Inventoried against the enclosed traceability
sheets. If no traceability sheets accompany the samples, then the inventory
is recorded in the appropriate laboratory notebook. During the inventory, the
condition of the samples is noted as well as the labeling information. The
label should be legible and contain the sample number as well as sample col-
lection information.
4.3.3 After inventory, the samples are stored 1n a cold room to
maintain sample integrity.
5.0 PREPARATION OF CALIBRATION STANDARDS, SPIKING SOLUTIONS, MATRIX SPIKES,
AND MATRIX BLANKS
5.1 PRIMARY STANDARD SOLUTIONS
5.1.1 Standards may be prepared from the purest available standard
materials or purchased as certified solutions.
5.1.2 The name, manufacturer, lot number, and purity of each
compound used to prepare primary stock solutions 1s recorded in the
appropriate laboratory notebook.
5.1.3 The following gravimetric method of standard preparation is
used to prepare primary standard solutions:
5.1.3.1 With an analytical balance accurate to 0.0001 g,
obtain Initial and final weights.
5.1.3.2 Calibrate the balance using class "S" weights if
available. This calibration should bracket the expected working range of the
standards. Record the calibration 1n the appropriate laboratory notebook.
5.1.3.3 Place about 9.0 mL methanol in a clean 10.0 mL class
"A" volumetric flask. Allow the flask to stand until all methanol wetted
surfaces have dried. Stopper the flask and obtain an initial weight.
5.1.3.4 LIQUIDS: Determine the target concentration for the
stock solution and use the density of the chemical to determine an approximate
volume to add to the flask. Add the appropriate amount of the standard
A-47
-------
material to the flask using a syringe. The liquid must fall directly onto the
surface of the methanol without touching the neck of the flask. Also, care
should be taken to not touch the surface of the methanol with the end of the
syringe as this would change the initial weight of the methanol and the
flask. The flask is immediately restoppered.
5.1.3.5 GASES: To prepare standards for any compounds that
boil below 30°C (e.g. bromomethane, chloroethane, chloromethane, and vinyl
chloride), fill a 5.0 ml valved gas-tight syringe with the reference standard
to the 5.0 ml mark. Lower the needle to 5 mm above the methanol meniscus.
Slowly introduce the reference standard above the surface of the liquid. The
heavy gas will rapidly dissolve in the methanol. Standards may also be pre-
pared by using a lecture bottle equipped with a Hamilton Lecture Bottle Septum
(#86600). Attach Teflon tubing to the side-arm relief valve and direct a
gentle stream of gas into the methanol meniscus. Immediately restopper the
flask.
5.1.3.6 Obtain a final weight on the flask. Dilute to volume,
stopper, and mix by inverting the flask several times. Calculate the concen-
tration in mg/mL from the net gain in weight. Unless the compound purity is
stated to be 99+#, then the concentration must be corrected for compound
purity.
5.1.4 The primary stock solution is transferred to a clean (see
Section 1.2.4) 2-dram vial, capped with a Teflon lined I1d, and sealed with
Teflon tape. The vial is filled so that a minimum amount of headspace remains
in the top of the vial. The vial is labeled with the name of the compound,
concentration, solvent, date prepared, initials of person preparing, and the
notebook reference for preparation. Store the vial at -10" to -20°C and
protect from light.
5.1.5 Prepare fresh standards every two months for gases. Reactive
compounds such as 2-chloroethyl vinyl ether may need to be prepared.more fre-
quently. All other standards must be replaced after six months, or sooner if
comparison with check standards indicates a problem.
5.2 INTERMEDIATE DILUTION STANDARDS
5.2.1 Using primary stock solutions, prepare Intermediate dilution
standards in methanol either singly or as a combined mix.
5.2.2 Use volumetric glassware and syringes for all dilutions.
5.2.3 Allow the primary stock to reach room temperature before pre-
paring the Intermediate solution. Check the stock solution for signs of
degradation or evaporation. The level of the liquid 1n the vial 1s marked
after each use, 1f possible, therefore once the solution has reached room tem-
perature the meniscus should match the mark on the vial. Gently mix the vial
by inversion prior to removing an aliquot of the primary stock.
A-48
-------
5.2.4 Add a small amount of methanol to the volumetric flask. Then
add the appropriate amount of primary stock solution(s). Dilute to volume,
stopper, and gently mix by inversion.
5.2.5 Transfer and store intermediate dilutions as described for
primary standard solutions (see Section 5.1.4).
5.3 CALIBRATION STANDARDS
5.3.1 Calibration standards containing the POHCs, surrogates, and
internal standards at a minimum of three concentration levels are prepared
from intermediate or primary stock solutions (Sections 5.1 and 5.2). Prepare
these solutions in methanol according to the procedure outlined in Section 5.2
for preparation of intermediate stock solution. Transfer an aliquot to a
reactivial with minimum headspace, cap with a mininert valve and label.
Transfer and store the remainder as in Section 5.1.4.
5.3.2 One of the concentration levels should be at a concentration
near, but above, the method detection limit (usually 10 ng total). The
remaining concentration levels should correspond to the expected range of con-
centrations found in real samples or should not exceed the working range of
the GC/MS system. Each standard contains all analytes for detection by this
method. In addition, the recovery internal standards (RIS) and surrogates are
included in the calibration standard mixes.
5.3.3 The calibration standards are replaced when signs of degrada-
tion are evident (typical replacement time is 2 weeks). If the standards fail
to pass the established curve or fail to pass the other calibration require-
ments (see Section 8.5), then the calibrations standards are reprepared.
5.4 SURROGATE AND RECOVERY INTERNAL STANDARD (RIS) SPIKING SOLUTIONS .
5.4.1 Surrogates are organic compounds which are similar to analytes
of interest in chemical composition, extraction, and chromatography, but which
are not normally found in environmental samples. These compounds are spiked
into all blanks, standards, samples, and spiked samples prior to analysis.
Percent recoveries are calculated for each surrogate and should not vary from
the expected values by more than ±35%. d8-Toluene, 4-bromofluorobenzene, and
d4-l,2-dichloroethane are typically used as surrogate compounds, as recom-
mended by SW-846 method 8240.
5.4.2 Recovery internal standards (RIS) are compounds added to all
standards, blanks, and samples which are used to quantitate the analytes. The
RIS chosen should be similar in analytical behavior to the compounds of
interest. It must be demonstrated that the measurement of the internal
standard is unaffected by method or matrix interferences. Bromochloromethane,
1,4-difluorobenzene, and d5-chlorobenzene are recommended by method 8240 as
RIS compounds. (Bromochloromethane, however, is sometimes found as a "native"
in samples, in which case its value as a surrogate is limited.) Method 5040,
"PROTOCOL FOR ANALYSIS OF SORBENT CARTRIDGES FROM VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING
TRAIN" requires d6-benzene as a RIS for VOST analysis. Other compounds may be
used depending on the analysis requirements. D6-benzene may be used as the
RIS for all sample types.
A-49
-------
5.4.3 A spiking solution containing each of the RIS and surrogate
compounds 1s prepared in methanol according to the procedure in Section 5.2,
INTERMEDIATE STOCK SOLUTIONS. Transfer an aliquot to a reactivial with a
mininert valve and continue as in Section 5.1.4. The final concentrations of
each surrogate and RIS are approximately 50 ng/yL). Two microliters (2 yL)
are used to spike each VOST trap, gas bag sample, water sample, and system
blank prior to analysis. This will yield 100 ng total per analysis for each
surrogate and RIS. Alternate spiking volumes and concentrations may be used
but will still yield approximately 100 ng total per analysis.
5.5 BROMOFLUOROBENZENE (BFB) FOR INSTRUMENT TUNING
5.5.1 A solution of 4-bromofluorobenzene in methanol with a concen-
tration of 50 ng/yL is prepared according to the procedure in Section 5.2.
This solution is used to tune the mass spectrometer according to SW-846 method
8240 specifications. (See Section 7.5.2.)
5.6 MATRIX SPIKING STANDARDS
5.6.1 Matrix spiking standards, if applicable, are prepared in
methanol from compounds representative of those being investigated. This
solution is used to prepare check samples and matrix spikes. No internal
standards or surrogates are added to this mix as these are added to these
samples during the routine prep of the samples. This solution is prepared
according to the procedure outlined in Section 5.2.
5.7 QC CHECK SAMPLES
5.7.1 A QC check sample is analyzed during the initial GC/MS
calibration (see Section 7.5.8) to verify the ratio of instrument response to
analyte amount. Analysis of this sample also serves to verify the preparation
of the calibration standards. This solution 1s prepared Independently of the
intermediate stocks used to prepare the calibration standards. The final con-
centrations of the analytes should fall within the calibration curve. This
solution 1s prepared according to the procedure outlined 1n Section 5.2. It
contains all analytes of specific quantitative interest.
6.0 PREPARATION OF SAMPLES, BLANKS, CHECK SAMPLES, MATRIX SPIKES, AND
REPLICATES
6.1 HOLDING TIMES
6.1.1 Unless otherwise specified by the trial burn plan, QA plan, or
the project leader, the holding time from date of sampling to date of analysis
for VOST samples is 2-6 weeks (see SW-846 method 5040 Section 6.2), and for
water samples, the holding time 1s 10 days.
6.2 VOST AND INTEGRATED GAS BAG SAMPLES (for analysis by purqe and trap
desorptlon GC/MS)
6.2.1 VOST traps are glass tubes filled with either Tenax (2,6-di-
phenylene oxide polymer) only or one half each Tenax and charcoal. The ends
A-50
-------
of these tube are tightly capped. One trap of each type constitutes a
"pair." There are generally three or four sample "pairs" per run. Each trap
1s analyzed separately. In addition, the field sampling crew prepares a field
blank pair for each run and a trip blank pair for each shipment container.
The field blank pair is opened briefly 1n the field. These samples are used
to demonstrate that there is no contamination from ambient conditions at the
site. The trip blank pair is never opened and accompanies each respective
sample batch of samples returning to the laboratory. These samples are to
demonstrate that there is no contamination from the shipping process.
6.2.2 The VOST samples need no preparation prior to analysis. These
samples are stored in the cold room until analysis and are spiked with a mixed
RIS and surrogate solution by the GC/MS analyst immediately prior to
analysis. A daily system blank is analyzed (see Section 8.5.3) by spiking a
clean trap with the RIS/surrogate solution. This 1s to ensure the cleanliness
of the GC/MS system and also serves as a blank sample for each day's
analysis. Each VOST trap is only valid for one analysis, therefore replicate
analyses and matrix spikes cannot be performed.
6.2.3 After analysis, the spent VOST traps and gas bags are returned
to field programs where they will be recycled.
6.3 WATER AND VOST CONDENSATE SAMPLES (for analysis by purge and
trap GC/MS)
6.3.1 Water samples are samples taken of various water streams as
specified by the trial burn plan for each project. These are usually called
scrubber waters and are usually of two types, Inlets and outlets. Occa-
sionally other types of water samples are taken, for example, VOST con-
densates, but they are prepared in the same manner.
6.3.2 The preparation of the water samples 1s performed in a
volatile free laboratory (VOA lab).
. 6.3.3 Water samples are sampled at either 15- or 30-min intervals
during each field test and are typically composited prior to analysis.
6.3,4 The samples are sorted according to run number and type.
Then, all of the VOA vials of each run and type are composited by pouring the
contents of the vial Into a larger clean compositing bottle. The composite 1s
gently mixed and the composited sample is returned to the original VOA vials
filling them in such a manner as to have no headspace in the vials. This is
done as quickly as possible to avoid loss of volatile compounds. The vials
are labeled as having been composited. Each vial is typically used for only
one analysis, with different VOA vial of the composited sample being used for
each replicate analysis. The remainder of the vials are stored in the cold
room (4-C).
6.3.5 Replicate analyses of samples should be performed at least
once every 20 samples. The project QA plan should be consulted for specific
requirements.
A-51
-------
6.3.6 Laboratory blanks for the water samples are performed using
VGA water with the addition of mixed surrogate and RIS spiking solution. This
1s done on a dally basis and also functions as the "system blank" for the
GC/MS system. In addition, the water field blanks (Section 1.1.4) shipped
with the samples are analyzed.
6.3.7 Five milHHters (5.0 ml) of each composited sample is
analyzed by GC/MS purge and trap. The GC/MS analyst spikes each sample with
the mixed RIS and surrogate spiking solution immediately prior to analysis.
7.0 GC/MS ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES BY PURGE AND TRAP
7.1 SUMMARY OF METHOD
7.1.1 Five mllUliters (5 mL) of the sample is poured into a glass
syringe, spiked with surrogate and RIS, then added to a glass purge tower. An
inert gas 1s bubbled through the solution at ambient temperature and the
volatile components are efficiently transferred from the aqueous phase to the
vapor phase. The vapor is swept through a sorbent column where the volatile
components are trapped. After purging is completed, the sorbent column is
heated and backflushed with Inert gas to desorb the components onto a gas
chromatographic column. The volatile POHCs are separated by temperature pro-
grammed gas chromatography and detected by mass spectrometry. The concentra-
tions of the POHCs are calculated using the Internal standard technique.
7.1.2 Refer to SW-846 method 8240 "GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROM-
ETRY FOR VOLATILE ORGANICS" for complete details of this analytic method. Any
deviations from SW-846 are listed in Section 11.0 of this document.
7.2 PURGE AND TRAP DEVICE
7.2.1 The purge and trap device consists of three separate pieces of
equipment: the sample purger, the analytic trap, and the desorber. It 1s
recommended that any surface to come 1n contact with the samples be con-
structed entirely of glass and Teflon.
7.2.2 The recommended purging chamber 1s designed to accept 5-mL
samples with a water column at least 3 cm deep. The gaseous headspace between
the water column and the trap must have a total volume of less than 15 mL.
The purge gas must pass through the water column as finely divided bubbles
with a diameter of less than 3 mm at the origin. The purge gas must be
introduced no more than 5 mm from the base of the water column. The sample
purger, Illustrated in Figure A2-3 meets these design criteria. Alternate
sample purge devices with 20-25 mL headspace may also be utilized. These have
been demonstrated to yield equivalent sample recoveries and are useful for
analysis of waste samples dispersed 1n PEG since line contamination 1s mini-
mized.
A-52
-------
OPTIONAL
THA?
!i Inefi 0. C.
0. 0.
Inte?
2-Way Syringe V»lv«
17 em. 20 Gauge Syringe
6 mm C. 0. Rufiaer Sectum
— 10 mm 0. C.
» _^^_^_^_J^^^^^
Inlet U 1/1S Inen 0. 0.
a Incn 0. 0. ' "•
10 mm GUss r
ium Porosity
Figure A2-3. Purging chamber,
A-53
-------
7.2.3 The trap must be at least 25 cm long and have an Inside diam-
eter of at least 0.105 in. Starting from the inlet, the trap is packed with
the following: 1.0 cm of methyl silicone coated packing (3% SP2100 on 60/80
Chromosorb WAW or equivalent to prolong the life of the trap); 15 cm 2,6-di-
phenylene oxide polymer 60/80 mesh chromatographic grade (Tenax GC or equiva-
lent); 8 cm silica gel 35/60 mesh (Davison, grade 15 or equivalent). If anal-
ysis for dichlorodifluoromethane or other fluorocarbons of similar volatility
is required, then the trap should be packed with equal parts of coconut char-
coal, Tenax, and silica gel with 1.0 cm of methyl silicone coated packing at
the inlet. The coconut charcoal is prepared from Barnebey Cheney, CA-580-26
lot #M-2649 by crushing through 26 mesh screen. If only compounds boiling
above 35°C are to be analyzed, then the trap should be packed with only the
methyl silicone packing and Tenax. Before initial use, the trap should be
conditioned overnight at 180°C by backflushing with an inert gas flow of at
least 20 mL/min. Vent the trap effluent to the room, not to the analytical
column. Prior to daily use, the trap should be conditioned for 10 min at
180°C with backflushing. The trap may be vented to the analytical column
during daily conditioning, however, the column must be run through the
temperature program prior to analysis of samples.
7.2.4 The desorber should be capable of rapidly heating the trap to
180°C for desorption. The polymer section of the trap should not be heated
higher than 180°C and the remaining sections should not exceed 220°C during
bake-out mode. The desorber design in Figure A2-4 meets these criteria.
7.2.5 The purge-and-trap device may be assembled as a separate unit
or may be coupled to a gas chromatograph as shown in Figures A2-5 and A2-6.
7.3 GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY SYSTEM
7.3.1 GAS CHROMATOGRAPH: An analytical system complete with a tem-
perature programmable gas chromatograph and all required accessories including
syringes, analytical columns, and gases.
7.3.2 COLUMN: 6 ft x 0.1 in i.d. glass, packed with 1% SP 1000 on
Carbopak-B, 60/80 mesh, or equivalent. In some cases, an 8 ft column with
similar packing provides better resolution of coelutlng compound such as car-
bon tetrachlorlde and 1,1,1-trlchloroethane. Alternatively, a 30-m DB-624
megabore capillary column can be used. This column has resolution and reten-
tion order comparable to the SP 1000, however, analysis time 1s shortened.
(This column was not commercially available at the time SW-846 was published.)
7.3.3 MASS SPECTROMETER: Capable of scanning from 40-260 amu every
3 s or less, using 70 electron volts (nominal) electron energy 1n the electron
Impact mode and producing a mass spectrum that meets all the criteria in
Table A3-1 when 100 ng of 4-bromofluorobenzene (BFB) are Injected through the
gas chromatographic inlet. Typically a MAT CH4, or Finnigan OWA, or
Varlan 312A 1s used.
A-54
-------
Procscur«
Cannrucnon
CUss Wool 5
Gradt 15
Siica G«i £
'//
Ttnax 15 cm
3%OV-1 1 em
Glass Wool 5 mm
'-' J
Firang Nut
«nd Ptrruies
Sitctrome
Ttmotraturt
Central ana
Pyrcmmr
Tubing 25 cn
a.:os m. i.o.
0,125 in. C.O.
Stwi
Trao Inltt
Figure A2-4. Trap packings and construction to include desorb capability.
A-55
-------
cus R.CW cr.vract.
RESUL^TSR
\
ucum INJZCTCN ^CXTT_
A -" CSUJMN CVC.N
Figure A2-5. Schematic of purge-and-trap device—purge mode.
CU0086AS
SS..ECTCN
INUT
S£25TANCS WIRE
AU. ONES JSTTTES1!
-? AND GC
TOM'C
Figure A2-6. Schematic of purge-and-trap device—desorb mode.
A-56
-------
7.3.4 GC/MS INTERFACE: Any GC-to-MS Interface that gives acceptable
performance criteria may be used. GC-to-MS Interfaces constructed entirely of
glass or of glass-lined materials are recommended. Glass can be deactivated
by sllanizing with dlchlorodimethylsilane.
7.3.5 DATA SYSTEM: A computer system that allows the continuous
acquisition and storage on machine-readable media of all mass spectra obtained
throughout the duration of the chromatographic program must be Interfaced to
the mass spectrometer. The computer must have software that allows searching
any GC/MS data file for Ions of a specified mass and plotting such ion abun-
dances versus time or scan number. This type of plot is defined as an
Extracted Ion Current Profile (EICP). Software must also be available that
allows integrating the abundances in any EICP between specified time or scan-
number limits. The most recent version of the EPA/NIH Mass Spectral Library
should also be available.
7.4 GC/MS OPERATING CONDITIONS
Electron energy: 70 electron volts (nominal)
Mass range: 40-260 (40-280 amu for the MAT CH4
mass spectrometer)
Scan time: To give 5 scans per peak but not to
exceed 7 s/scan.
Initial column temperature: 45°C
Initial column holding time: 3 m1n
Column temperature program: 8°C/m1n
Final column temperature: 220°C
Final column holding time: Analyte and matrix dependent
Injector temperature: 200-225'C
Source temperature: According to manufacturer's
specifications
Transfer line temperature: 250-300°C
Carrier gas: Helium at 30 cm/sec
Purge flow: Nitrogen at 40 mL/min
7.5 INITIAL CALIBRATION
7.5.1 Each mass spectrometer will be calibrated for mass scale using
perfluorokerosene (PFK) or perfluorotrlbutyl amine (FC-43) according to
manufacturer's specifications.
7.5.2 Each GC/MS system must be hardware tuned to meet the criteria
In Table A2-1 for a 100 ng Injection of BFB (see Section 5.5). Analysis must
not begin until these criteria are met.
7.5.3 A system blank consisting of five m1H1l1ters (5.0 mL) reagent
(VOA) water spiked with the surrogate/RIS solution will be analyzed (as
outlined 1n Sections 7.5.4.1 through 7.5.4.5) to ensure that the GC/MS system
1s contaminant free. This shall be done immediately before and after the
calibration curve injections. Should the system prove to be contaminated,
then the following measures are taken.
A-57
-------
TABLE A2-1. BFB ION ABUNDANCE CRITERIA
Mass Ion abundance criteria
50 15% to 40% of mass 95
75 30% to 60* of mass 95 ' ..
95 Base peak, LOO* relative abundance
96 555 to 9* of mass 95
173 Less than 2% of mass 174
174 Greater than 50* of mass 95
175 5% to 9* of mass 174
176 Greater than 95* but less than 101* of mass 174
177 5% to 9* of mass 176
A-58
-------
7.5.3.1 Perform a "bake-out" of the analytic system by running
through the temperature program and heating the analytic trap. Occasionally,
an overnight bake-out of the system may be necessary to rid the system of
gross contamination.
7.5.3.2 Ensure that the purge towers and syringes have been
properly cleaned.
7.5.3.3 Obtain fresh VOA water to rule out contaminated water.
7.5.3.4 If necessary, the spiking solution will be reprepared
to rule out contamination during the preparation.
7.5.3.5 If these measures prove to be unsuccessful in elim-
inating the contamination, then the GC/MS supervisor or project leader should
be consulted for further action to be taken.
7.5.4 A five-point calibration curve will be established using the
following procedure:
7.5.4.1 After allowing the standards to warm to room tempera-
ture, spike the calibration standards (see Section 5.3) into an all glass
syringe containing 5 ml VOA water. Be sure the standard solution is expelled
beneath the surface of the water and away from the delivering syringe
needle.
7.5.4.2 This solution 1s then mixed by Inversion and added to
the purge tower. Purge the standard for 11.0 m1n at ambient temperature.
7.5.4.3 At the conclusion of the purge time, desorb the
analytic trap, begin the GC temperature program, start the GC/MS data acquisi-
tion. Concurrently, Introduce the trapped materials to the column by rapidly
heating the trap to 180*C while backflushing the trap with inert gas between
20 and 60 mL/m1n for 4 m1n.
7.5.4.4 While the trap 1s being desorbed into the GC, empty
the purge tower. Wash with a minimum of two 5 ml flushes of reagent water (or
methanol followed by reagent water) to avoid carryover into subsequent
analyses.
7.5.4.5 After desorblng the standard for 4 min, recondition
the trap by returning the purge-and-trap device to the purge mode. Maintain
flow through the trap. The trap temperature should be maintained at 180°C.
Trap temperatures up to 220" may be employed, however, the higher temperatures
will shorten the useful life of the trap. After approximately 7 m1n, turn off
the trap heater and open the valve to stop the gas flow through the trap.
When cool, the trap 1s ready for the next sample.
7.5.5 Tabulate the area response of the characteristic Ions (see
Table B2-1-2) against concentration for each organic compound of Interest,
surrogate, and each Internal standard. This 1s calculated for each point in
the curve. Calculate response factors (RF) for each compound relative to the
internal standard.
A-59
-------
TABLE A2-2. RETENTION TIMES AND CHARACTERISTIC IONS FOR
VOLATILE COMPOUNDS
Compound
Acetone
Acroleln
Acrylon1tr11e
Benzene
Bromod 1 ch 1 oromethane
Bromoform
Carbon tetrachlorlde
Ch 1 orodl bromomethane
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Chloroform
l,l-D1chloroethane
l,2-D1chloroethane
l,l-D1chloroethene
trans- l,2-D1chloroethene
1 ,2-D1chloropropane
cis- 1 , 3-D 1 ch 1 oropropene
trans- 1 , 3-D 1 ch 1 oropropene
Dlethyl ether
Ethylbenzene
Methyl ene chloride
Methyl ethyl ketone
1,1,2, 2-Tetrach 1 oroethane
Tetrachl oroethene
Toluene
1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
1,1,2-Trlchloroethane
Trlchl oroethene
Trlchlorofluoromethane
Retention
time (rain)
—
—
17.0
14.3
19.8
13.7
—
18.6
11.4
—
—
9.0
10.0
15.7
15.9
17.2
26.4
6.4
22.1
22.2
23.5
13.4
17.2
16.5
8.3
Primary 1on
43
56
53
78
83
173
117
129
63
83
63
62
96
96
63
75
75
106
84
83
164
92
97
97
130
101
Secondary
1on(s)
58
55, 58
52, 51
52, 77
85, 129
171, 175, 252
119, 121
208, 206
65, 106
85, 47
65, 83
64, 98
61, 98
61, 98
62, 41
77, 39
77, 39
91
49, 51, 86
85, 131, 133
129, 131, 166
91, 65
99, 117
83, 85, 99
95, 97, 132
103, 66
A-60
-------
The RF 1s calculated as follows:
RF = (AxC1s)/(A1sCx)
where:
Ax = Area of the characteristic 1on for the compound being
measured.
A1s = Area of the characteristic 1on for the specific Internal
standard.
C1s = Amount (ng) of the specific Internal standard.
Cx = Amount (ng) of the compound being measured.
7.5.6 Tabulate the area response of the characteristic Ions of each
organic compound of Interest and surrogate against the concentration of the
Internal standards as described In Section 7.5.5.
7.5.7 Calculate the average RF for each compound. If the RF value
over the working range is a constant (±20% RSD), the RF can be assumed to be
invariant, and the average RF can be used for calculations. This variability
range may be expanded to ±30% RSD with the approval of the project leader.
The ability to meet this criteria is dependent upon the concentration range of
the calibration standards; i.e., a wider range will have a larger RSD. Alter-
natively, the results can be used to plot a calibration curve of response
ratios As/A1s versus RF.
7.5.8 Analyze a QC check sample by the procedure described
beginning in Section 7.5.4.1. The recoveries should fall within ±20% of the
expected value.
7.6 DAILY CALIBRATION
7.6.1 Perform the calibration steps as described in Sections 7.5.1
and 7.5.2 on a daily basis. In addition, the BFB tuning requirement must be
demonstrated every 12 h during extended work days.
7.6.2 Analyze an aliquot of reagent water. This will serve as both
a system blank and a reagent blank.
7.6.3 Dally calibration checks are performed by analyzing the
mldrange standard at least once every 12 h.
7.6.3.1 The internal standard responses are examined for re-
tention time shifts. If the retention times have shifted more than 30 s from
the last calibration check, the chromatograpMc system must be Inspected for
malfunctions and corrections made.
7.6.3.2 If the EICP area for any of the internal standards
changes by a factor of two from the last dally calibration check standard, the
mass spectrometer must be inspected for malfunctions and corrections made as
appropriate.
A-61
-------
7.6.3.3 When corrections are made, reanalysls of samples ana-
lyzed while the system was malfunctioning are necessary.
7.7 ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES
7.7.1 Once the initial and/or daily calibration requirements have
been met, analysis of samples may begin.
7.7.2 An aliquot of the well mixed water sample prepared in
Section 6.3 is poured into an all glass syringe. The volume of the water
sample 1s adjusted to 5.0 mL. The sample 1s then spiked with the
surrogate/RIS spiking solution and mixed by inversion.
7.7.3 Analysis then continues as described in Section 7.5.4 using
5.0 mL of sample and spiking with the RIS/surrogate solution.
7.7.4 If analysis of the sample shows any analyte to be outside the
calibration range of the instrument, this sample must be diluted as described
in 7.7.4.1 and 7.7.4.2. If the high level sample saturates any of the quan-
titation ion, a system blank must be analyzed to assure no carryover to the
next analysis.
7.7.4.1 Dilutions are made from a different VGA vial of the
composited sample than was used for the first analysis whenever possible.
7.7.4.2 Allow the water sample to be diluted and the VOA water
to reach room temperature. Add an aliquot of the sample to a volumetric flask
and dilute to volume with the VOA water. An aliquot of this dilution is ana-
lyzed as 1n Section 7.5.4 using 5.0 mL of the diluted sample and the RIS/sur-
rogate solution.
7.7.5 Surrogate recoveries must be ±35% from the expected value.
Reanalysis of the sample 1s necessary if recoveries fall out of this range.
7.7.6 A replicate analysis is performed for every 20 samples unless
otherwise specified by the project specific trial burn plan or the QA plan.
8.0 GC/MS ANALYSIS OF VOST SAMPLES
8.1 SUMMARY OF METHOD
8.1.1 The traps are spiked with an internal standard solution using
the flash evaporation technique. They are then thermally desorbed for 11 min
at 180'C with organic-free nitrogen, bubbled through 5 mL of organic-free
water, and trapped on the analytical trap. After the Il-m1n desorption, the
analytical trap 1s rapidly heated to 180"C with the carrier gas reversed so
that the effluent flow from the analytical trap is directed Into the GC/MS.
The volatile POHCs are separated by temperature-programmed gas chromatography
and detected by low-resolution mass spectrometry. The concentrations of the
volatile POHCs are calculated using the internal standard technique.
A-62
-------
8.1.2 Refer to SW-846 method 5040 "PROTOCOL FOR ANALYSIS OF SORBENT
CARTRIDGES FROM VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN" for complete details of this
analytic method. Deviations are listed in Section 11.0 of this document.
8.2 APPARATUS
8.2.1 Trap spiking apparatus:
8.2.1.1 Internal standards are Introduced Into each VOST trap
prior to analysis using a special accessory. This consists of a trap holder,
a heated GC-type septum Injector, and a supply of helium gas. The injector is
maintained at a temperature of 220°C and the helium flow is about 50 mL/min.
8.2.2 Thermal desorptlon unit:
3.2.2.1 The thermal desorptlon unit 1s capable of heating the
traps to 180"C with flow of organic-free nitrogen through the traps. For
Inside/Inside VOST traps, use the Supelco "clamshell" heater; for
inside/outside VOST traps, a user fabricated heater is required.
8.2.3 Purge and trap device:
8.2.3.1 The purge and trap unit 1s as described in
Section 7.2.
8.3 GC/MS SYSTEM
8.3.1 The GC/MS system 1s as described in Section 7.3.
8.4 GC/MS OPERATING CONDITIONS
8.4.1 The GC/MS operating conditions are as described 1n Sec-
tion 7.4.
8.5 INITIAL CALIBRATION
8.5.1 Each mass spectrometer will be calibrated for mass scale
using perfluorokerosene (PFK) or perf1uorotributyl amine (FC-43) according to
manufacturer's specifications.
8.5.2 Each GC/MS system must be hardware tuned to meet the criteria
1n Table B2-1-1 1 for a 100-ng Injection of BFB (see Section 5.5). Analyses
must not begin until these criteria are met.
8.5.3 A system blank 1s performed Immediately before and after
analysis of the calibration curve standards according to the following proce-
dure:
8.5.3.1 Turn the helium flow on. Insert a clean trap into the
spiking accessory and seal with the knurled nut.
A-63
-------
8.5.3.2 Using an exact volume technique, slowly Inject the
Internal standard solution Into the vaporizing port of the spiking acces-
sory. After 15 seconds, shut off the gas flow, and remove trap. The total
flow of gas through the trap during addition of internal standards should be
25 ml or less.
8.5.3.3 Place the spiked trap into the thermal desorption unit
and attach the "clamshell11 heater. Check the flow to ensure a 40-mL/min
nitrogen flow rate. Heat trap and desorb for 11 min.
8.5.3.4 The desorbed components pass into the bottom of the
water column, are purged from the water, and are collected on the analytic
trap. After the Il-m1n desorption period, the compounds are desorbed from the
analytical trap Into the GC/MS system by rapidly heating the analytic trap and
backflushing with inert gas for 4 m1n.
8.5.3.5 If the system proves to be contaminated, then the cor-
rective action outlined in Section 7.5.3 is initiated.
8.5.4 A minimum of calibration standards at three levels are used
to prepare the calibration curve. Each standard is analyzed on three Tenax
traps spiked with calibration standards to establish a calibration curve.
These traps are spiked and analyzed as described beginning in Section 8.5.3.1.
8.5.5 Tabulate the area response of the characteristic ions of each
analyte (surrogate and compound of interest) against the concentration of the
internal standards as described 1n Section 7.5.5.
8.5.6 Calculate the average RF for each compound. If the RF value
over the working range 1s a constant (±20% RSD), the RF can be assumed to be
invariant, and the average RF can be used for calculations. This variability
range may be expanded to ±30% RSD with the approval of the project leader.
The ability to meet this criteria 1s dependent upon the concentration range of
the calibration standards; I.e., a wider range will have a larger RSD. Alter-
natively, the results can be used to plot a calibration curve of response
ratios As/A1s versus RF.
8.5.7 Analyze AQC check sample by the procedure described beginning
in Section 8.5.3.2. The recoveries should fall within ±20% of the expected
value.
8.6 DAILY CALIBRATION
8.6.1 Perform the calibration steps outlined 1n Sections 7.5.1 and
7.5.2. In addition, the BFB tuning requirement must be demonstrated every
12 h during extended work days.
8.6.2 A system blank is analyzed as outlined 1n Section 8.5.3.
8.6.3 A dally calibration check is performed by spiking a Tenax
trap with the mid range calibration standard. The response factors calculated
from this Injection must not vary by more than ±20% for any analyte. This
A-64
-------
variability range may be expanded to ±30% with the approval of the project
leader.
8.7 ANALYSIS OF VOST SAMPLES
8.7.1 Each sample trap, field blank trap, and trip blank trap is
analyzed by the procedure described beginning in Section 8.5.3.
8.7.2 If analysis shows any analyte to be outside the calibration
range of the instrument, then a higher level standard is prepared and analyzed
to bracket that sample.
8.7.3 If samples are encountered that have concentrations of
analytes above the highest point in the calibration curve, the cleanliness of
the system must be proved by analyzing a system blank as in Section 8.5.3. If
this system blank proves to be clean, this establishes a new lower limit for
the analysis of system blanks. If, on subsequent analyses, a sample is en-
countered that is above this new limit, a system blank must be analyzed. Once
again, if this proves the system to be clean, then this higher limit is estab-
lished. This continues until an amount of analyte is found that does not
clean up from the system during the usual operating procedure. When this
occurs, a longer bake-out of the system is required.
9.0 DATA INTERPRETATION
9.1 QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS
9.1.1 An analyte is identified by comparison of the sample mass
spectrum with the mass spectrum of a standard of the suspected compound (stan-
dard reference spectrum). Mass spectra for standard references are obtained
on the user's GC/MS within the same 12 h as the sample analysis. These
standard reference spectra may be obtained through analysis of the calibration
standards. Two criteria must be satisfied to verify identification: (1) elu-
tion of sample component at the same GC relative retention time (RRT) as those
of the standard component; and (2) correspondence of the sample component and
the standard component mass spectrum.
9.1.2 The sample component RRT must compare within ±0.06 RRT units
of the RRT of the standard component. For reference, the standard must be run
within the 'same 12 h as the sample. If coelutlon of interfering components
prohibits accurate assignment of the sample component RRT from the total 1on
chromatogram, the RRT is assigned by using extracted 1on current profiles for
ions unique to the component of interest.
9.1.3 Every 1on plot and mass spectrum will be visually inspected
to ensure that (1) All ions present in the standard mass spectra at a relative
intensity greater than 10% (most abundant ion 1n the spectrum equals 100%)
must be present in the sample spectrum. (2) The relative intensities of Ions
specified 1n (1) must agree within ±20% between the standard and sample
spectra. (Example: for an 1on with an abundance of 50% in the standard
spectra, the corresponding sample abundance must be between 30% and 70%.)
These criteria may be relaxed slightly if, in the best professional judgment
A-65
-------
of the data analyst, a compound lacking all criteria is still deemed to be a
"hit."
9.1.4 If the project specific trial burn plan indicates that com-
pounds other than the analytes of Interest (I.e., PICs or unknowns) are to be
identified, this work is performed by personnel experienced in mass spectral
interpretation. A computer search of the NBS mass spectral library is
obtained for each unknown spectrum, followed by manual evaluation of the
spectra and search results. Manual searches of mass spectral libraries are
also used to facilitate Identifications. In some cases it is not possible to
identify a compound based on its electron impact mass spectrum alone. To the
extent possible, these compounds will at least be characterized by class; for
example, as "hydrocarbon", "amine", etc. Unknown and PIC compounds may also
be semiquantitated by calculating ng amounts as outline in Section 7.5.9 using
total 1on areas for both unknown and internal standard and assuming a response
factor of 1.000.
9.2 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS
9.2.1 Specific quantitatlon information based on response factors
for compounds (Section 9.5.6) will be done for surrogates and POHCs only.
Quantitation for PICs and unknowns will be calculated using RFs of 1.000 or
historical response factors if available.
9.2.2 When a compound has been identified, the quantification of
that compound will be based on the Integrated abundance from the EICP of the
primary characteristic 1on. For VOST samples only, if the primary ion is
saturated or has an interference, then a secondary 1on 1s used for quantifica-
tion. However, a new RF should be established for the secondary ion. Quanti-
fication will take place using the Internal standard technique.
9.2.3 Calculate the total ng per analysis of each identified
analyte in the sample as follows:
total ng = [Aa/A1s] x [C1s/RFal
where:
Aa - Area of the characteristic 1on for the analyte to be-
measured.
A1s - Area of the characteristic 1on for the specific
Internal standard.
C1s = Amount (ng) of the specific Internal standard.
RFa = Calculated average response factor for the analyte.
9.2.4 The "TCA" quantitatlon report values may be used 1n place of
manual calculations for the total ng per analysis.
9.2.5 VOST samples are reported as total ng per trap or total ng
per pair.
A-66
-------
9.2.6 Water samples are reported in ng/mL by the following:
jig/L = ng/mL = total ng found / purge volume (5.0 ml)
9.2.7 Waste feeds are reported 1n ug/g by the following:
lug found/injection volume (ml)I x [dilution (ml_)/sample wt(g)]
9.2.8 Report results without correction for recovery data. When
duplicates, matrix spikes, and check samples are analyzed, report all data
with sample results.
10.0 QUALITY CONTROL
Specific QC requirements are included in the section where appropriate,
however, a summary of the QC performed with sample preparation and analysis is
summarized in this section.
10.1 BLANKS
10.1.1 Field blanks are analyzed to ensure that no contamination of
the samples has occurred during the sampling and shipping processes. Trip
blanks are a specific type of field blank and are utilized for VOST analysis
to segregate the sampling process from the shipping process. See Sec-
tion 6.2.1 for further explanation of VOST trip and field blanks. The
preparation of water field blanks is outlined in Section 1.1.4.
10.1.2 System blanks for the GC/MS system are performed on each In-
strument on a daily basis. These analyses are to demonstrate that the GC/MS
system is free from contaminants. These may also function as reagent blanks
(Section 10.1.3).
10.1.3 Reagent blanks are performed by spiking the various reagents
with RIS and surrogate and are analyzed according to the procedure for that
type of sample. This 1s done for each batch or lot number of reagent.
10.2 SAMPLE QA REQUIREMENTS
10.2.1 For all water samples spiked with surrogates. Recoveries
are calculated for all these samples and must fall within ±35%.
10.2.2 Replicate analyses water samples are performed at least once
per 20 samples. However, the project specific QA plan 1s consulted for addi-
tional replicate analyses.
10.3 INITIAL INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION REQUIREMENTS
10.3.1 Each instrument 1s calibrated for mass scale using PFK or
FC-43 according to manufacturer's specifications prior to the Initial calibra-
tion curve.
10.3.2 Each Instrument is tuned to meet the criteria in Table A2-1
for a 100-ng injection of BFB.
A-67
-------
10.3.3 A calibration curve 1s established and acceptable per-
formance demonstrated prior to the analysis of samples. Initial calibration
procedures are dependent on sample type and are outlined 1n Sections 7.5, 8.4,
and 8.5.
10.4 DAILY INSTRUMENT CALIBRATION REQUIREMENTS
10.4.1 Each Instrument is calibrated for mass scale with PFK or FC-
^ on a daily basis.
10.4.2 The BFB performance criteria in Table 1 must be demonstrated
every 12 h.
10.4.3 Daily calibration requirements are dependent on sample type
and are outlined 1n Sections 7.6 and 8.6.
11.0 MODIFICATIONS FROM SW-846 METHODS
11.1 METHOD 8240 "GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY/MASS SPECTROMETRY FOR VOLATILE
ORGANICS"
METHOD 8240
SECTION NO. MODIFICATION
4.12.3 100 ng of BFB 1s Injected rather than 50 ng. This
5.5 gives better Instrument response on the lower
7.2.2 Intensity Ions.
7.3.1
5.1.3 Purities < 100* (or 99+%) are corrected.
5.3 Concentrations of stock solutions will vary
5.4 according to analysis needs. Usually, surrogate
5.7 and RIS solutions are such that 100 ng per analysis
1s achieved. RIS and surrogates are prepared as a
mix for VOST, water samples, and system blanks.
A three point calibration curve 1s acceptable.
5.6 Calibration standards are prepared in methanol rather
than reagent water and they are used until signs of
degradation become evident.
5.8 standard solutions are stored 1n clear vials and placed
1n a closed container to protect from light.
6.1 New bottles and vials are cleaned according to
Introductory Chapter, Section 4.1.2. Sample bottles
and vials are not reused, they are decontaminated with
methanol and disposed of. Reactlvials and volumetric
flasks are decontaminated after use, then cleaned as
1n Section 4.1.2.
A-68
-------
7.2.5 Calibration standards are prepared as a mix which
includes analytes, surrogates, and RIS. This standard is
spiked directly into the glass syringe containing 5.0 ml
VOA water, mixed, and added to the purge tower.
7.2.9 The GC/MS data system (INCOS) uses n rather than n-1 for
SRSD calculations. If a %RSD falls within 3% of the
cutoff value, then this &RSD is recalculated manually
using n-1 to achieve a more accurate value.
7.4.1 Water samples are not prescreened as they generally
contain a very low concentration of analytes.
7.4.1.5 Purge gas is nitrogen at 40 mL/min. Carrier gas is
helium at 30 cm/s.
7.4.1.7.3 Only one aliquot for analysis is taken from.any given VOA
vial. If replicates are required, then these aliquots
are taken from individual VOA vials. If dilutions are
necessary, then an aliquot 1s taken from a fresh VOA
vial.
7.5.2 Quantitatlon for PICs will be completed by using the RFs
generated by standard injections. Unknowns will be
quantified by using RRFs of 1.000.
8.5.1 Concentrations of analytes will vary depending on
8.5.2 the analysis needs.
11.2 METHOD 5040 "PROTOCOL FOR ANALYSIS OF SORBENT CARTRIDGES
FROM VOLATILE ORGANIC SAMPLING TRAIN"
METHOD 5040
SECTION NO. MODIFICATION
5.3.2 Stock solutions are maintained for 2 months for
reactive compounds and gases, 6 months for all others.
They are replaced sooner if signs of degradation are
evident, (per method 8240)
5.5 100 ng BFB used for better instrument response on 7.1 the
lower Intensity ions.
5.6 Concentrations of stock solutions will vary depending
on analysis needs.
7.2.3 Internal standard amounts are typically 100 ng per
analysis.
8.4.1 Acceptable range for internal standard areas 1s ±35% from
run to run, or a factor of two (-50% to +100%) from the
last daily standard per method 8240.
A-69
-------
APPENDIX A-4
SEHIVOUTILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS AND
PCDD/PCDF DETERMINATION
A-71
-------
APPENDIX A-4
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS AND
PCOD/PCDF DETERMINATION
1.0 GLASSWARE PREPARATION
1.1 Standard Procedures
All glassware for field sampling and analysis of semlvolatlle organic
compounds is prepared according to the following procedures.
1.1.1 Wash all glassware in hot, soapy water (use ISOCLEAN nonlonic
soap, Micro, Alconox, or equivalent synthetic detergents and a clean brush).
1.1.2 Rinse with tap water (5X), delonized water (3X), and bulk acetone
(2X).
1.1.3 Air dry and cover open ends of glassware with solvent-rinsed
aluminum foil and store in appropriate drawers.
1.1.4 Any glassware that gives an indication of still being dirty, I.e.,
the water and acetone rinses do not "sheet," should be recleaned by soaking in
concentrated sulfuric acid overnight then rinsed as 1n Section 1.2.2.2.
1.1.5 Before actual use, clean glassware and Teflon liners from storage
drawers should be rinsed with high purity acetone followed by a 2X rinse with
the appropriate solvent to be used in the method. Glassware for field
sampling should be rinsed a final time with methylene chloride (DCM).
1.1.6 Glassware used for extraction, concentration, and cleanup
procedures are numbered as a set. Such glassware 1s to be used 1n a set.
1.1.7 A final rinse of the glassware sets with the appropriate solvent
should be collected 1n a vial, labeled to note glassware type and set, and
archived as a glassware rinse.
1.1.8 The dram vials, reacti-vlals, and autosampler vials are rinsed 2X
with the solvent to be used and allowed to air dry.
1.1.9 When required, dram vials may be precalibrated by dispensing a
measured volume of the appropriate solvent into the vial and etching the glass
at the bottom of the minlscus. Precallbrated vials are to be rerinsed with
the appropriate solvent and allowed to dry.
1.1.10 V1al caps are to be lined with solvent-rinsed Teflon liners.
A-73
-------
1.1.11 After use, glassware is to be rinsed once with extraction solvent
and once with bulk acetone before detergent washing.
1.2 SW-846 Method Modifications, Deviations, and Enhancements
The following modifications, deviations, and enhancement from SW-846 and
other standard methods will be employed during this study. None are expected
to impact the quality of the results submitted. The glassware cleaning
procedure deviates from SW-846, Chapter 4 recommended method, as follows.
1.2.1 SW-846 recommends using methanol rather than bulk acetone in
Steps 1.1.2 and 1.1.11.
1.2.2 SW-846 suggests using a hot (> 50°C) soap water soak and a hot
water rinse.
1.2.3 SW-846 recommends a soak with hot chromic acid solution to destroy
traces of organic compounds.
2.0 SORBENT CLEANUP AND PREPARATION
2.1 XAD-2 Cleanup and Trap Preparation
2.1.1 Extraction and Fluidation—A batch of XAD-2 adsorbent (Alltech
Assoc./Applied Science, 20/50 mesh, 90 A pore size, precleaned) is placed into
a Soxhlet extraction apparatus and extracted for 22 h with methylene chloride
(DCM) as outlined in Section 2.3.2.
The XAD-2 is then placed into an evaporating dish lined with methylene
chloride-rinsed aluminum foil, placed in a hood and dried for 12 h. The
evaporating dish is lined with aluminum foil to prevent possible contamination
of the XAD-2 resin from the dish. Prerlnsed aluminum foil is placed over the
XAD-2 to keep partlculate matter from falling into the evaporating dish during
drying.
Glass wool (preextracted with methylene chloride as outlined in
Section 2.4.1) is placed in the bottom of a 1-L continuous extraction
column. The XAD-2 adsorbent is next placed into the column (- 1,000 g/
extraction column). A stream of high purity gaseous nitrogen is passed for
16 h through a bed of 50% activated carbon/50% molecular seive and then
through the extraction column. The rate of N2 flow should gently dry the
resin. Excessive fluidation may cause the XAD-2 particles to break up. The
activated charcoal/molecular sieve trap consists of a 8 x 1 1/2 in stainless
steel case with stainless steel frits on the Inlet and outlet. All lines
connecting the N2 tank to the column should be Teflon or precleaned copper
tubing.
2.1.2 Storage of Extracted XAD-2—Precleaned XAD-2 resin not to be used
immediately (within 2 weeks) should be stored under high purity methanol.
A-74
-------
2.1.3 Packing the XAD Trap—
2.1.3.1 Dry method—PI ace a wad of glass wool (preextracted with
methylene chloride) Into the bottom of a precleaned XAD-2 cartridge. The XAD
trap is packed just prior to use 1n the field (not to extend longer than
2 weeks prior to use). Use just enough glass wool to cover the glass frit.
Add XAD-2 resin to fill the cartridge to the top of the curved section. Do
not tap the cartridge. Packing the resin too tightly may plug the sample
train during sampling. Add enough glass wool (preextracted) into the top of
the cartridge to ensure the resin will not leak out. Cover both ends of the
cartridge tightly with methanol-rinsed aluminum foil. Wrap the cartridge with
bubble pack and tape to ensure safe delivery to the field site.
2.2 Cleanup and Preparation of Solid Materials Used in the Analytical
Procedures
2.2.1 The following adsorbents are to be extracted in the giant Soxhlet
extractor.
Na2SO^ (anhydrous, granular, Fisher Scientific or equivalent)
Florisil (pesticide grade, 60/100 mesh)
2.2.2 Soxhlet Extraction Procedure for the 12-L Giant Soxhlet—
2.2.2.1 Charge the Soxhlet by adding 6 L OCM in the 12-L round bottom
flask.
2.2.2.2 Add boiling chips (silicon carbide) to the 12-L round bottom
flask.
2.2.2.3 Place preextracted regular glass wool in bottom of Soxhlet
extractor to prevent sol Ids from entering Into the Soxhlet arm. Add the solid
material and wet with 1 L DCM.
2.2.2.4 Extract overnight, 16 to 22 h at a turnover rate of 2 cycles/h.
2.2.2.5 Remove the solid material from the extractor and air dry in
methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil-lined evaporating dishes until solvent
odor 1s no longer detected (~ 4 h).
2.2.3 Adsorbent and Drying Agent Activation Procedure—
2.2.3.1 NaaSOn—Ensure that the Na2SOH 1s dry. Transfer the a1r-dr1ed
Na2SOH to small -evaporating dishes and heat 1n a muffle furnace at 400°C for
4 h.
Store the Na2SO\ 1n a clean glass jar covered with methylene chloride-
rinsed foil 1n an oven at 130'C.
2.2.3.2 Floris 11—Activate a batch of Florisll by heating at 130°C for
16 h. Store 1n a desiccator.
A-75
-------
2.2.3.3 Carbopak C/Celite 545—Prepare by mixing 3.6 g of Carbopak C
(80/100 mesh) and 16.4 g of Cellte 545 in a 40-mL vial (different amounts may
be mixed in the same proportions). Place sorbent mixture on rock tumbler and
tumble for 3 h. Activate at 130*C for 6 h. Store in a desiccator.
2.3 Cleanup and Preparation of Glass Wool and Boiling Chips
2.3.1 Glass Wool (Soxhlet Extraction) —
2.3.1.1 Add approximately 6 L of methylene chloride to a 12-L round
bottom flask. Add boiling chips (silicon carbide) to the 12-L round bottom
flask.
2.3.1.2 Place regular or silanized glass wool in Soxhlet and wet with
1 L methylene chloride.
2.3.1.3 Extract overnight, 16 to 22 h at a rate of 2 cycles/h.
2.3.1.4 Air dry on methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil.
2.3.1.5 Store on bench in clean glass jar with Teflon-lined screw cap.
2.3.2 Boiling Chips—
2.3.2.1 Silicon carbide boiling chips (Soxhlet extraction)—
2.3.2.1.1 Add approximately 500 ml of methylene chloride to a 1-L
round bottom flask. Add boiling chips (silicon carbide) to the round bottom
flask.
2.3.2.1.2 Place preextracted regular glass wool 1n the bottom of a
71/60 Soxhlet extractor* Add the silicon carbide boiling chips to be
extracted and wet with approximately 200 ml of methylene chloride.
2.3.2.1.3 Extract overnight, 16 to 22 h.
2.3.2.1.4 A1r dry on methylene chloride-rinsed aluminum foil.
2.3.2.1.5 Store on bench in a clean glass jar with a Teflon-lined
lid.
2.3.2.2 Berl saddle boiling chips—Simply crush the Berl saddles to
small pieces and store 1n a methylene chloride-rinsed vial or jar with Teflon-
lined lid.
2.4 SVI-846 Method Modifications, Deviations, and Enhancements
The following modifications, deviations, and enhancement from SW-846 and
other standard methods will be employed during this study. None are expected
to Impact the quality of the results submitted.
A-76
-------
2.4.1 Appendix A of SW-846 Method 0010 suggests two XAD-2 cleanup
methods.
2.4.1.1 Initial rinse of XAD-2 resin 1n Type II water (2X) 1n a beaker,
followed by Soxhlet extraction with water (8 h), methanol (22 h), and two
separate methylene chloride extractions, each for a duration of 22 h.
2.4.1.2 Using an XAD-2 cleanup extraction apparatus which Includes a
three-necked flask, air-jacketed Snyder distillation column, and an XAD-2
canister 1n which the resin 1s held light spring tension between a pair of
coarse and fine screens. Solvent is refluxed through the Snyder column, and
the distillate is continuously cycled upward through the XAD-containing canis-
ter for extraction and returned to the flask. The resin is first water-washed
by pumping 20 L of distilled water upward through the canister. The resin is
then solvent-rinsed with methanol and methylene chloride (2X) for 10 to 20 h
using the described distillation apparatus.
2.4.1.3 MRI will extract the XAD-2 for 22 h using methylene chloride
(Section 2.1.1). The resin purchased will have been precleaned by the
manufacturer. A subsample of the cleaned resin will be solvent extracted and
analyzed by GC/MS to ensure that the resin has been efficiently cleaned.
2.4.2 Appendix A of Method 0010 suggests two XAD-2 drying techniques.
MRI will use a method similar to the second option recommended, modified as
follows. The high purity nitrogen will be passed through a stainless steel
case (approximately 200 ana capacity) containing a mix of activated carbon and
molecular sieve (in equal proportions).
2.4.3 Method 0010 recommends that cleaned XAD-2 be stored 1n an
airtight, wide-mouth amber jar or in one of the glass sorbent modules sealed
with Teflon film and elastic bands for no more than 4 weeks. MRI will modify
this procedure by storing the precleaned resin 1n a jar under high purity
methanol if it will not be used within 2 weeks after preparation.
2.4.4 Method 0010 recommends the use of Teflon boiling chips for all
sample preparation procedures (Soxhlet extraction, Kuderna Danish volume
reduction). MRI will use silicon carbide or Berl saddle boiling chips
instead.
3.0 EXTRACTION OF FIELD SAMPLES FOR SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
3.1 Sample Train and Aqueous Sample Extraction
The components of the Modified Method 5 (MM5) sampling train that need to
be extracted are as follows:
Particulate filter/probe rinse
XAD-2 resin/back half rinse
• Condensate water
These and several other additional aqueous samples (e.g., scrubber water, lean
water) from the trial burns will be spiked with a method internal standard
A-77
-------
(I.e., surrogates) compounds and solvent extracted. The MM5 components will
be solvent-extracted using procedures consistent with SW-846 Method 0010,
while the additional aqueous and ash samples will be extracted using SW-846
3500-series methods.
The extracts from the MM5 sampling train components may be combined into
a single extract, thus generating a new composite, as described below.
Because they will be composited, only the particulate/XAD resin extracts will
be spiked with method internal standards.
3.1.1 Extraction of Probe Rinse and Back Half R1nse~
The probe rinse and back half rinse are treated separately but in the
same way. Each 1s composed of combined acetone and toluene rinses which may
contain water.
3.1.1.1 If the rinse sample contains particulate matter, set up a glass
fiber filter folded in quarters and held with a powder funnel such that it
drains into a separatory funnel. Record the glassware Identification numbers
in the lab record book (LRB), collect all proper glassware rinses, and
archive.
3.1.1.2 Filter the sample into the separatory funnel. The filter and
filter catch will be extracted with the particulate filter and XAO-2 resins
(Section 3.1.2). Rinse the powder funnel (used to hold the filter, if
applicable) with toluene into the separatory funnel.
3.1.1.3 Rinse the sample container with toluene and pour the rlnsates
Into the separatory funnel.
3.1.1.4 Back extract the rinses by adding enough reagent water to the
separatory funnel so that its volume 1s 3X the volume of the field sample
rinses. Drain the acetone/water layer from the bottom of the separatory
funnel and save (see 3.1.1.5). Drain the toluene phase into a separate clean
bottle.
3.1.1.5 Pour the acetone/water phase back Into the separatory funnel and
extract two more times with toluene. Combine these toluene extracts with the
toluene extract from step 3.1.1.4.
3.1.1.6 Save this extract for combination with the particulates, XAD,
and condensate extracts and proceed to Section 4.0.
3.1.1.7 At least one method blank (consisting of 1 L of reagent water
spiked with the method Internal standards) 1s to be extracted with each set of
samples extracted by this method.
3.1.2 Extraction of Particulate Filters and XAD Resin—
3.1.2.1 Set up a 155/50 Soxhlet extraction apparatus with 200 ml toluene
in a 500-mL boiling flask along with several boiling chips. Record the
identification numbers of glassware and lot numbers of the solvent used 1n the
lab record book (LRB). Collect all glassware rinses and archive.
A-78
-------
3.1.2.2 Put preextracted regular glass wool in the bottom of the Soxhlet
extractor to prevent partlculates from entering the Soxhlet arm. Confirm that
the probe rinses do not contain any particulate matter (refer to
Section 3.1.2.1). If the probe rinses contain particulates, add the filter
containing the particulates to the Soxhlet extractor.
3.1.2.3 Carefully fold the MM5 train filter in half. Do not allow any
particulate material to be lost from the filter. Add the particulates sample
to the Soxhlet extractor using tweezers, being careful not to lose any
particulate material from the filter. Rinse the sample container with three
5-mL portions of toluene and add to the boiling flask.
3.1.2.4 Add the entire contents of the XAD-2 resin module (±75 g) from
the sampling train to the Soxhlet extractor. Cover the XAD-2 resin with
preextracted glass wool to ensure that the resin is held in the extractor.
Soxhlet extractors should not be filled more than one half full with resin.
Rinse the resin module thoroughly with toluene into the Soxhlet extractor.
3.1.2.5 Spike the sample with the method internal standards (surrogate)
solution (see Tables 3 and 5).
3.1.2.6 Extract the sample for at least 16 h at a solvent cycling rate
of 3 cycles/h.
•
3.1.2.7 Drain the solvent extract into the boiling flask. If there is
an aqueous layer 1n the extract, transfer the extract into a separatory funnel
and drain the water layer off.
3.1.2.8 Save the solvent extracts for combining with the condensate, the
front half, and back half rinse extracts and proceed to Section 4.0.
3.1.3 MM5 Train Condensates—Each of the aqueous samples will be extracted
according to SW-846 3500-ser1es methods as described below. The MM5 train
condensate samples will be extracted using toluene and will be combined with
the filter, front half, and back half rinse extracts.
3.1.3.1 Separatory funnel extraction (SW-846-3510)—
This method 1s designed to quantitatively extract semivolatile organic
compounds from aqueous samples using a separatory funnel. If emulsions
present a significant problem during sample extraction, the sample will be
drained into a-continuous liquid-liquid extractor (Section 3.1.3.2) and the
extraction continued.
3.1.3.1.1 The liquid samples will be extracted using a 2-L separatory
funnel. Record the glassware Identification numbers 1n the LRB and collect
the appropriate glassware rinses for archiving.
3.1.3.1.2 Mark on the sample bottle the level of the meniscus for
subsequent determination of total sample volume.
A-79
-------
3.1.3.1.3 Shake the sample container for 30 s and pour a 1-L portion of
the sample Into a graduated cylinder. Add the 1-L portion to the separatory
funnel. If the sample exhibits two separate phases, transfer the balance of
the sample to the separatory funnel. Drain each phase Into separate con-
tainers. The aqueous phase will be transferred back to the original sample
container. The organic layer will be drained into a clean bottle and treated
as described 1n Section 4.0.
3.1.3.1.4 Mark the level of the meniscus on the side of the sample
container for determination of the aqueous phase volume. Measure a 1-L
portion of the aqueous phase and pour it back into the separatory funnel.
3.1.3.1.5 Spike the sample with the method internal standards mix (see
Tables 3 and 5) and gently swirl the solution. DO NOT SPIKE COMPENSATE
SAMPLES FROM THE MS SAMPLING TRAIN WITH METHOD INTERNAL STANDARDS.
3.1.3.1.6 Check the pH of the aqueous sample using a glass stirring rod
to apply several drops of the sample to a piece of multirange pH paper.
3.1.3.1.7 Adjust the pH of the sample to about 8 using either a 6N NaOH
solution for acidic samples or a 6N H2SO^ solution for alkaline samples. Add
the acid or base, swirl the contents of the separatory funnel, check the pH,
and readjust as necessary until a neutral pH 1s attained.
3.1.3.1.8 Add 60 ml of the extraction solvent to the original sample
container, cap, and shake 30 s to rinse it.
3.1.3.1.9 Transfer the solvent rinse to the separatory funnel and
extract the sample by shaking vigorously for 2 min with periodic venting to
release excess vapor pressure. Record solvent lot number in the LRB.
3.1.3.1.10 Allow the organic layer to separate from the aqueous phase.
When using methylene chloride as a solvent, drain the organic phase into a
clean bottle. If the solvent employed is toluene, drain the aqueous phase
into the original sample bottle, and drain the organic phase into a clean
bottle. Transfer the aqueous phase back to the separatory funnel.
3.1.3.1.11 Repeat steps 3.1.3.1.8 to 3.1.3.1.10 two more times,
combining each of the three extracts in the same bottle and proceed to
Section 4.0.
3.1.3.1.12 At least one method blank (consisting of 1 L of reagent water
spiked with the method Internal standards) 1s to be extracted with each set of
samples extracted by this method.
3.1.3.1.13 Measure the volume of the aqueous phase and of the total
sample described above by adding water to the sample bottle to the marks
made. Pour the water Into a graduated cylinder and record the volume of
sample extracted.
A-80
-------
3.1.3.2 Continuous liquid extraction (SW-846-3520)--
This method is designed to quantitatively extract semivolatile organic
compounds from aqueous samples using a continuous liquid-liquid extractor.
This method is to be used only for samples that form emulsions when extracted
using a separatory funnel. The samples that form emulsions during
step 3.1.3.1.9 should be transferred directly to the continuous liquid
extractor and the extraction continued using the device.
3.1.3.2.1 The liquid samples will be extracted using a continuous
liquid-liquid extractor. Record the glassware identification numbers in the
LRB and collect the appropriate glassware rinses for archiving.
3.1.3.2.2 Assemble the device and add 200 mL of the appropriate solvent
to the extractor. Add 300 ml of the appropriate solvent to the 500 mL boiling
flask together with several boiling chips and install on the device.
3.1.3.2.3 Measure 1 L of sample into a 1-L graduated cylinder. If the
sample to be extracted by this method is from the separatory funnel method
described above, transfer the entire sample into the continuous liquid-liquid
extractor, rinse the separatory funnel 3X with 25 ml of solvent and proceed to
step 3.1.3.2.8.
3.1.3.2.4 Spike the sample with the method internal standards mix (see
Tables 3 and 5) and gently swirl the solution. DO NOT SPIKE COMPENSATE
SAMPLES FROM THE W5 SAMPLING TRAIN WITH METHOD INTERNAL STANDARDS.
3.1.3.2.5 Check the pH of the aqueous sample using a glass stirring rod
to apply several drops of the sample to a piece of multirange pH paper.
3.1.3.2.6 Adjust the pH of the sample to about 8 using either a 6N NaOH
solution for acidic samples or a 6N H2SOlf solution for alkaline samples. Add
the acid or base, swirl the contents of the separatory funnel, check the pH,
and readjust as necessary until a neutral pH is attained.
3.1.3.2.7 Transfer the sample to the extractor. Rinse the graduated
cylinder 3X with 30 mL of solvent and add to the extractor.
3.1.3.2.8 Turn on the cooling water to the condenser and the heating
mantle and extract the sample for at least 18 h.
3.1.3.2.9 Treat the sample extract as described in Section 4.0.
3.1.3.2.10 At least one method blank (consisting of 1 L of reagent water
spiked with the method internal standards) is to be extracted with each set of
samples extracted by this method.
3.2 SW-846 Method Modifications. Deviations, and Enhancements
The following modifications, deviations, and enhancements from SW-846 and
other standard methods will be employed during this study. None are expected
to impact the quality of the results submitted.
A-81
-------
3.2.1 SW-846 Method 3510 and 3520 require that samples extracted from an
aqueous matrix be extracted first under basic conditions and subsequently
under addle conditions. Because of the nature of the target analytes,
performing the extractions under nonneutral pH conditions may result in their
degradation. Furthermore, the analysis is not directed toward base/neutral
and acidic compounds, but rather to neutral compounds only.
3.2.2 SW-846 Method 0010 specifies that methylene chloride be used as
the. organic solvent for extraction of MM5 components. However, during the
conduct of independent studies to test the effectiveness of various solvents
in extracting PCDO/PCDFs from dynamically spiked MM5 train components, MRI
scientists discovered that toluene is a more effective solvent. Therefore,
toluene will be used as the preferred organic solvent for extracting MM5
components.
3.2.3 SW-846 Method 0010 specifies that each individual MM5 sampling
train component be spiked with surrogates (I.e., method internal standards)
prior to solvent extraction. Analysis of each MM5 component separately would
increase analytical costs significantly. Furthermore, independent studies
conducted by MRI scientists on dynamically spiked MM5 sampling trains
indicated that the bulk of the organic analytes recovered from MM5 sampling
trains is found in the partlculate filter catch and XAD-2 trap. Therefore,
the partlculate filter catch will be coextracted with the XAD-2 resin
components, and only this sample will be surrogate-spiked.
3.2.4 SW-846 Method 0010 specifies that the train solvent rinses are
treated as a single sample during extraction. MRI will treat the probe and
back half rinses separately.
3.2.5 SW-846 Method 0010 specifies that, during liquid-liquid extraction
of MM5 train solvent Hnses and condensate, the sample be Initially extracted
under acidic conditions and subsequently under basic conditions. Since the
analytes of Interest (PCDD/PCDFs, PCBs) are neutral, the samples will be
extracted under neutral conditions.
4.0 EXTRACT CONCENTRATION AND COLUMN CLEANUP FOR SEMIVOLATILE ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
Each of the sample extracts from the various extraction procedures will
be concentrated for GC/MS analysis. Depending on the type of compounds to be
analyzed, concentration of the samples may be followed by a column cleanup
procedure and then further concentrated. Column cleanup procedures for
analysis of PCDD/PCDFs are based on those described in SW-846 Draft
Method 8290. Method 0010 for the analysis of MM5 sampling train components
has no provisions for extract cleanup. However, through long experience with
the analysis of PCDD/PCDFs, MRI chemists have determined that the MM5 samples
have sufficient Interferences that make extract cleanup compulsory.
4.1 KD Concentration of Extracts
4.1.1 Place a small plug of preextracted silanized glass wool in a
powder funnel and fill with approximately 20 g of preextracted anhydrous
granular NazSOlf.
A-82
-------
4.1.2 Transfer sample from the original extract container via the sodium
sulfate packed funnel to a 500-mL KD flask fitted with a 25-mL graduated
concentrator tube containing two clean boiling chips. Make sure the concen-
trator tube is firmly in place (with clamp or elastic bands) in order to avoid
loosing sample or allowing steam to condense in the sample. Pour in enough
sample extract to fill the KD flask no more than one-half full. Since the
volume of the MM5 sampling train extracts will likely exceed the capacity of
the KD flask, several transfers to the KD flask may be necessary.
4.1.3 Attach a 3-ball Snyder column to the KD flask and rinse with 1 ml
of the appropriate solvent.
4.1.4 Place the KD apparatus on a steam bath outlet such that the entire
lower rounded surface of the KD flask is bathed with steam. At the proper
rate of distillation, the balls 1n the Snyder column will constantly chatter,
but the chambers will not flood with condensed solvent.
4.1.5 When all of the contents of the original extract containers have
been added to the KD flask, rinse the containers three times with 25 ml of the
appropriate solvent and add the rinses to the KD flask through the sodium
sulfate packed funnel.
4.1.6 Concentrate the extract to a final volume of 5 ml.
4.1.7 Add 50 ml of hexane to the KD flask, add a fresh boiling chip to
the flask, reattach the Snyder column, and concentrate the sample extract to
approximately 5 ml.
4.1.8 Rinse the flask and lower joint of the KD apparatus with two 5-mL
portions of hexane and adjust the final extract volume to 20 ml.
4.1.8.1 If the sample is to be analyzed for both PCBs and
PCDD/PCDFs (composited MM5 sampling train extracts), the sample extract will
be split into two 10-mL portions. Dispense 10 ml of the extract into two
separate vials.
4.1.8.2 If the sample is to be analyzed for PCBs only (ash,
scrubber effluent, lean water samples), the volume 1s further reduced to 10 ml
and stored 1n a vial.
4.2 Column Cleanup Procedures
The following column cleanup procedure is based on the methods described
1n SW-846 Draft Method 8290.
4.2.1 Transfer the 10-mL aliquot of the extract slated for analysis of
PCDD/PCDFs into a 125-mL separatory funnel.
4.2.2 Add 40 ml of a 2055 (w/v) aqueous KOH solution to the extract.
Shake the contents for 2 min and rapidly drain and discard the aqueous
(bottom) phase. Repeat the base washing until no color 1s visible in the
aqueous layer to a maximum of four washings. Strong base is known to degrade
certain PCDD/PCDFs, so contact time with the base must be minimized.
A-83
-------
4.2.3 After the aqueous phase of the last base washing has been drained,
add 40 ml of a 5% (w/v) aqueous NaCl solution. Shake for 2 m1n. Drain and
discard the aqueous phase.
4.2.4 Add 40 ml concentrated H2SO,» to the sample extract. Shake for 2
m1n. Drain and discard the sulfuric add (bottom) phase. Repeat the acid
washing until no color 1s visible in the acid layer to a maximum of four
washings.
4.2.5 After the acid phase of the last acidic washing has been drained,
add 40 ml of a 5% (w/v) aqueous NaCl solution. Shake for 2 min. Remove and
discard the aqueous (bottom) layer.
4.2.6 Transfer the extract to a 50-mL boiling flask by passing it
through a powder funnel packed with anhydrous granular Na2SO^ as described
above. Rinse the sodium sulfate with two 15-mL portions of hexane into the
boiling flask, and concentrate the sample extract to near-dryness using a
rotary evaporator (35°C water bath), making sure that all traces of toluene
(when applicable) have been removed.
4.2.7 Dry pack a gravity column (glass, 300 mm x 10.5 mm) fitted with a
PTFE stopcock in the following manner:
4.2.7.1 Insert a precleaned plug of silanized glass wool in the
bottom of the column.
4.2.7.2 Add a 4-g layer of sodium sulfate to the column.
4.2.7.3 Add a 4-g layer of Woelm Super I neutral alumina and tap
the top of the column gently. Woelm Super I neutral alumina does not need to
be activated or cleaned prior to use, but it should be stored at all times in
a sealed desiccator.
4.2.7.4 Add a 4-g layer of anhydrous granular sodium sulfate to
cover the alumina.
4.2.7.5 Elute the column with 10 ml hexane and close the stopcock
just before the level of the solvent reaches the top layer of sodium
sulfate. Discard the eluate and check the column for channeling. If
channeling is present, discard the packing and repack the column.
4.2.8 Adjust the volume of the acid and base washed extract to 2 ml with
hexane and gently apply the extract to the top of the column. Open the
stopcock to draw the sample Into the column and close the stopcock. Rinse the
sample container with three 1-mL portions of hexane and add to the column,
always drawing the rinse Into the column before applying the next rinse.
Discard the eluate.
4.2.9 Elute the column with 10 ml of an 8% (v/v) methylene chloride 1n
hexane solution. Collect this fraction and archive.
A-84
-------
4.2.10 Elute the PCDD/PCDFs from the column using 15 ml of a 60% (v/v)
methylene chloride in hexane solution. Collect this fraction in a 15-mL
conical vial.
4.2.11 Pack a carbon column for further cleanup of the sample as
follows:
4.2.11.1 Cut off both ends of a 10-mL disposable serological pi pet
such that a 4-in column remains.
4.2.11.2 Insert a preextracted silanized glass wool plug at one end
of the column and pack the column with 0.64 g of the activated Carbopak
C/Celite 545 mixture to form a 2-cm-long adsorbent bed. Cap the packing with
another silanized glass wool plug.
4.2.12 Concentrate the alumina column eluate (step 4.2.1.10) using a
nitrogen evaporator as follows:
4.2.12.1 Rinse the disposable pipettes to be used as needles in the
N2 evaporator with hexane.
4.2.12.2 Insert the sample vial in the rack and direct the flow of
N2 into the sample. Adjust the flow such that gentle waves are noticeable on
the surface of the sample extract.
4.2.12.3 Concentrate the sample extract to < 1 ml, add 5 ml hexane,
and concentrate to 2 ml.
4.2.13 Rinse the Carbopak C/Celite 545 column with the following
solvents:
• 5 ml toluene
2 ml of a 75:20:5 (v/v) methylene chloride/methanol/ benzene mix
• 1 ml of a 1:1 (v/v) cyclohexane/methylene chloride mix
• 5 ml hexane
4.2.14 The flow rate should be less than 0.5 mL/min. Discard the
rinsates.
4.2.15 While the column is still wet with hexane, add the sample
concentrate to the top of the column. Rinse the sample extract container
twice with 1-mL hexane portions and add the rinsates to the top of the
column. Elute the column sequentially with:
• Two 2-mL portions of hexane
One 2-mL portion of a 1:1 (v/v) cyclohexane/methylene chloride mix
One 2-mL portion of a 75:20:5 (v/v) methylene chloride/
methanol/benzene mix
A-85
-------
4.2.16 These eluates can be collected 1n the same container. Archive
these the combined eluates for checks on column efficiency.
4.2.17 Invert the column and elute the PCDD/PCDF fraction with 20 ml
toluene into a 50-mL boiling flask. Verify that there are no carbon fines in
the eluate.
4.2.18 Concentrate the toluene fraction to about 1 ml on a rotary
evaporator (water bath at 50°C). Carefully transfer the sample into a
graduated 1-mL conical vial, and reduce the volume to about 100 yL using a
nitrogen evaporator. Rinse the boiling flask three times with 300 yL of a 1%
(v/v) toluene in methylene chloride solution and add to the cleaned-up
extract. Reduce the volume to 100 yL once again.
4.2.19 Store the sample at room temperature in the dark.
5.0 PREPARATION AND USE OF CALIBRATION STANDARDS, METHOD INTERNAL STANDARDS
(SURROGATES), AND RECOVERY INTERNAL STANDARDS
Recovery internal standards are compounds added to the native sample
matrix just prior to GC/MS analysis to determine the recovery of method inter-
nal standards and relative response factors of the calibration standards.
Method internal standards (surrogates) are compounds added to the native
sample matrix prior to sample extraction to determine if any sample matrix
effects and extraction problems prevent good recovery of the compounds from
the sample.
5.1 General Procedures for Standard Preparation
5.1.1 Preparation and/or acquisition of accurate calibration standards,
method internal standards, and recovery internal standards are extremely
crucial in achieving accurate quantification of sample components and
determination of analytical quality. It is also important that the standards
be prepared in the correct solvent, since the standards are used both for
direct analysis and for spiking.
5.1.2 As many as possible of the pure compounds and diluted calibration
standards will be obtained from the EPA Quality Assurance Branch, EMSL/CI, and
the Reference Standards Repository EPA/RTP.
5.1.3 The source, lot number, and purity of all standards will be
recorded in the LRB. All standard solutions will contain the following infor-
mation on its respective vial:
Concentration of standard
Date of preparation
Solvent used
Project number of sample ID
Initials of person preparing solution
Expiration date of solution
A-86
-------
5.1.4 Primary stock solutions of the various target analytes will be
prepared. All neat standards will be weighed on an analytical balance and
diluted to the mark 1n a Class A volumetric flask with the appropriate
solvent. Secondary standard mixes will be prepared by combining the
appropriate volumes of the primary stock solutions in a Class A volumetric
flask and diluting to the mark with the appropriate solvent.
5.1.4.1 Calibrate the analytical balance prior to weighing
standards by using certified Class S weights which are in the range of the
standard weighings.
5.1.4.2 Dilutions of the secondary standard mixed solutions will be
prepared by serial dilution. Preparation of final working solutions will be
recorded and dilution records maintained.
5.1.4.3 The various standard solutions will be stored at 4°C in a
Teflon-lined screw-cap amber vial with the solution level marked on the vial.
5.2 Standards Used 1n the Analysis of PCDD/PCDF Organic Compounds
The semlvolatlle organic compounds consist of liquids and solids. The
solid and liquid compounds will be weighed and diluted to volume in Class A
volumetric flasks. Wash all glassware used in the standard preparation as
outlined in Section 1.2.2 of Section 1.0. All standards are stored at < 4°C
1n amber vials with Teflon-lined screw cap.
Recovery Internal, method Internal (surrogate), native calibration and GC
performance check standard solutions for PCDD/PCDF analysis should be obtained
from the MRI repository of d1ox1n/furan standards. See Table A4-1 for a
complete 11st of dioxin/furan analytes, method internal standards, and
recovery Internal standards. D1ox1n/furan native calibration standard, method
Internal standard (surrogate) and recovery internal standard solutions will
be:
• Dissolved 1n anlsole or toluene and diluted with trldecane for
analysis by 6C/MS. The method Internal standards will be prepared
1n Isooctane for spiking Into samples.
• Prepared 1n quantities of at least 1 ml. Prepare enough method
Internal standard to last the entire project.
Prepared 1n concentrations listed 1n Table A4-2. Each working
standard solution will be prepared to contain the same concentration
of each of the 1sotop1cally stable labeled method Internal standards
but a different concentration of native calibration standards. The
ratio of native calibration standards to method Internal standards
will range from 0.05 to 4.
• Replaced after 6 months or sooner if comparison with quality control
check samples indicates compound degradation or concentration
change.
A-87
-------
The GC performance check mixture will be per Table A4-3 with each isomer
at a concentration equivalent to DF50 from Table A4-2.
-------
TABLE A4-1. LIST OF ANALYTES, METHOD INTERNAL STANDARDS (SURROGATES), AND RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS FOR DIOXIN/FURAN ANALYSIS
Compounds 1n
Analyte calibration standard
Method
Internal standard*
Recovery
Internal standard1
Tetra-CDD 2,3,7,8-TCDD
Tetra-CDF 2,3,7,8-TCDF
Penta-CDD 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
Penta-CDF 1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
Penta CDF 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
Hexa-CDD
Hexa-CDD
Hexa-CDD
Hexa-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hexa-CDF
Hexa-CDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3.7,8,9-HxCDF
Hepta-CDD 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
Hepta-CDF 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
Hepta-CDF 1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
Octa-CDD
Octa-CDF
OCDD
OCDF
i3C12-2,3,7,8-TCDD
i3Cl2-2,3,7,8-TCDF
i3C12-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
i3C12-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
i3C12-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
i3C12-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
i3Cl2-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
i3C12-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
i3C12-OCDD
i3C12-l,2,3,4-TCDDc
i3C12-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDDd
a Added to sample prior to extraction.
b Added to sample at time of Injection Into GC/MS.
c Used for recovery determinations of TCDD, TCDF, PeCDD, and PeCDF method Internal
standards.
^ Used for recovery determinations of HxCDD, HxCDF, HpCDD, HpCDF, and OCDD method
Internal standards.
A-89
-------
TABLE A4-2. SUGGESTED CONCENTRATIONS OF CONGENERS IN TCDD/TCDF-OCDD/OCDF
CALIBRATION STANDARDS, METHOD INTERNAL STANDARDS (SURROGATES), AND RECOVERY
INTERNAL STANDARDS FOR SIM ANALYSIS
Concentration (pq/uL)
Compound
Unlabeled Analytes
2,3,7,8-TCDD
2,3,7,8-TCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1.2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
1.2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
OCDD
OCDF
Internal Standards
l3Ci2-2,3,7,8-TCDD
l3Cl2-2,3,7,8-TCDF
13C12-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
l3Cl2-l,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
13C12-l,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
l3C12-l,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
l3Ci2-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCOD
13C12-l,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
"C12-OCDD
Recovery Standards
i3Clz-l,2,3,4-TCDOa
i3C12-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDDb
DF2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
2.5
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
6.25
12.5
12.5
50
50
50
50
125
125
125
125
250
50
125
DF5
5
5
5
5
5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
25
25
50
50
50
50
125
125
125
125
250
50
125
DF10
10
10
10
10
10
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
50
50
50
50
50
50
125
125
125
125
250
50
125
DF50
50
50
50
50
50
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
250
250
50
50
50
50
125
125
125
125
250
50
125
DF200
200
200
200
200
200
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
1,000
1,000
50
50
50
50
125
125
125
125
250
50
125
a Used for recovery determinations of TCDD, TCDF, PeCDD, and PeCDF Internal
standards.
b Used for recovery determinations of HxCDD, HxCDF, HpCDD, HpCDF, and OCDD
Internal standards.
A-90
-------
TABLE A4-3. PCDD AND PCDF CONGENERS PRESENT IN THE GC PERFORMANCE
EVALUATION SOLUTION AND USED FOR DEFINING THE HOMOLOGOUS GC
RETENTION TIME WINDOWS ON A 60-m DB-5 COLUMN4
No. of
chlorine
atoms
>
5
6
7
8
PCDD-Dositional
1 somer
Early eluter Late eluter
1,3,6,8
1,2,4,6,8/
1,2,4,7,9
1,2,3,4,6,8
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 1
1,2
1,2,8,9
1,2,3,8,9
1,2,3,4,6,7
,2,3,4,6,7,9
,3,4,6,7,8,9
PCDF-pos1t1onal
1 somer
Early eluter Late eluter
1,3,6,8
1,3,4,6,8
1,2,3,4,6,8
1,2,3,4,6,7,8 1
1,2
1,2,8,9
1,2,3,8,9
1,2,3,4,8,9
,2,3,4,6,7,9
,3,4,6,7,8,9
a Tetra- and penta-CDD and CDFs will be at 50 pg/vL, hexa- and hepta-
CDD and CDFs will be at 125 pg/yL, and octa-CDD and CDFs will be at
250 pg/yL.
b In addition to these two PCDD Isomers, the 1,2,3,4-, 1,2,3,7-, 1,2,3,8-,
2,3,7,8-, i3<;12-2,3,7,8-, and 1,2,3,9-TCDD Isomers must also be
present.
A-91
-------
6.0 GC/MS ANALYSIS OF PCDD/PCDFs
Analysis for PCDD/PCOFs will be performed 1n accordance to SW-846 Draft
Method 8290. This method employs high resolution gas chromatography/ high
resolution mass spectrometry techniques to measure parts-per-trillion and
lower levels of PCDD/PCDFs 1n soil, sediment, and aqueous samples. MRI has
adapted the method for analysis of PCDD/PCDFs 1n MM5 sampling train
components.
MRI will use In-house developed software to reduce and quantify the
results for all samples. In addition, the data from a selected number of
samples will be reduced manually to validate the results obtained from the MRI
developed software.
6.1 Instrument Requirements and Operating Conditions
The following analytical Instrument requirements and operating conditions
will be used for the analysis of PCDD/PCDFs by GC/HRMS.
• Mass spectrometer—double focusing, capable of maintaining static
resolving power at a minimum of 10,000 (10* valley). Should be
operated 1n the electron Impact mode at a nominal electron energy of
70 eV. The mass spectrometer must be operated 1n the selected 1on
monitoring (SIM) mode. System must be capable of acquiring data at a
minimum of 10 Ions per scan.
• Scan time—1 s or less (Including voltage reset time).
• Scan range—202 to 472 amu, SIM mode monitoring the Ions listed 1n
Table A4-4.
• Resolution—10,000.
• Analytical column—DB-5, 60-m x 0.32-mm ID, 25-un film thickness.
• Carrier gas—Helium, 20 to 40 cm/s.
Injector—Grob type, spHtless mode at 270°C, splitless valve time of
45 s.
• Injection volume--! to 2 jiL, same volume used for all standards and
samples.
• Transfer line temperature—350°C.
• Temperature program—200°C (2-m1n hold), Increase to 220°C at 5"C/m1n
(!6-m1n hold), increase to 235 at 5°C/m1n (7-m1n hold), Increase to
330'C at 5°C/m1n (5-m1n hold).
A-92
-------
TABLE A4-4. IONS MONITORED FOR HRGC/HRMS ANALYSIS OF PCDD/PCDFs
(S = INTERNAL/RECOVERY STANDARD)
Descriptor Accurate(a)
Mass
1 303.9016'
305.8987
315.9419
317.9389
319.8965
321.8936
331.9368
333.9339
375.8364
[354.97921
2 339.8597
341.8567
351.9000
353.8970
355.8546
357.8516
367.8949
369.8919
409.7974
[354.9792]
Ion
IB
M
M+2
M
M+2
M
M+2
M
M+2
M+2
LOCK
M+2
M+4
M+2
M+4
M+2
M+4
M+2
H+4
M+2
LOCK
Elemental
Composition
C12H435C140
C12H435C1337C10
13C12H435C140
13C12H435C1337C10
C12H435C14°2
C12H435C1337C102
13C12H435C1402
13C12H435C1337C102
C12H435ClfiO
C9F13
C12H335C1437C10
C12H335C1337C120
13C12H335C1437C10
13C12H335C1337C120
C12H335C1437C102
c12H335a337ci2o2
13C12H335C1437C102
13C12H335C1337C1202
C12H335C17°
C9F13
Analyte
TCDF
TCDF
TCDF (S)
TCDF (S)
TCDD
TCDD
TCDD
-------
TABLE A4-4 (continued)
Descriptor Accurate
Mass
3 373.8208
375.8178
383.8642
385.8610
389.8156
391.8127
401.8559
403.8529
445.7555
[354.9792]
4 407.7818
409.7789
417.8253
419.8220
423.7766
425.7737
425.8169
437.8140
479.7165
[430.9728]
Ion
ID
M+2
M+4
M
M+2
M+2
M+4
M+2
M+4
M+4
LOCK
M+2
M+4
M
M+2
M+2
M+4
M+2
M+4
M+4
LOCK
Elemental
Composition
C12H235C1537C10
C12H235C1A37C120
13C12H235C160
13C12H235C1537C10
C12H235C1537C102
C12H235C1437C1202
13C12H235C1537C102
13C12H235C1437C1202
C12H235C1637C120
C9F13
C12H35C1637C10
C12H35C1537C120
13C12H35C170
13C12H35C1637C10
C12H35C1637C102
C12H35C1537C1202
13C12H35C1637C102
13C12H35C1537C1202
C12H35C1737C120
C9F17
Analy t*
HxCDF
HxCDF
HxCDF (S)
HxCDF (S)
HxCDD
HxCDD
HxCDD (S)
HxCDD (S)
OCDPE
PFK
HpCDF
HpCDF
HpCDF (S)
HpCDF (S)
HpCDD
HpCDD
HpCDD (S)
HpCDD (S)
NCDPE
PFK
A-94
(ContiQutd)
-------
TABLE A4-4 (continued)
Descriptor Accurate
Mass
5 441
443
457
459
469
471
513
[430.
.7428
.7399
.7377
.7348
.7779
.7750
.6775
9728 ]
Ion
ID
M+2
M+4
M+2
H+4
M+2
M+4
M+4
LOCK
Elemental
Composition
C
C
C
C
"c
13C
C
1235'
35,
12
35
12
12
35
12
35
12
35
12
Cl?
C16
ci7
C16
C17
d6
C18
37
37
CIO
Cl
2°
37cio2
37
37
37
37
Cl
2°2
CIO 2
Cl
Cl
2°2
2°
C9F17
Analytt
OCDF
OCDF
OCDD
OCDD
OCDD
OCDD
DCDPE
PFK
(S)
(S)
(a>The follouing ouclidic masses were used:
H - 1.007825 . 0 - 15.994915
C - 12.000000 35C1 . 34.968853
13C - 13.003355 37C1 - 36.965903
A-95
-------
6.2 Instrument Tuning and Calibration
The GC/MS must be tuned and calibrated every day during which samples are
to be analyzed. The following tests must be performed at the beginning and
end of each 12-h period (except as specified below) of sample analysis.
6.2.1 Mass Calibration—
The following tests are used to check the mass spectrometer's resolving
power and mass accuracy. These tests are conducted because the mass of the
Ions monitored are exact (to four decimal places), and even slight instru-
mental drift may result in incorrect masses being monitored. These tests are
to be performed at the beginning and end of each 12-h period of consecutive
analysis.
6.2.1.1 Introduce a small amount of PFK (perfluorokerosene) into the
system by molecular leak. The level of PFK introduced into the system should
be adjusted so that the amplitude of the most intense lock-mass 1on signal
does not exceed 10% of the full-scale deflection.
6.2.1.2 The mass resolution check is accomplished by recording the peak
profiles of m/z 304.9824 and 380.9760 of PFK on a calibrated mass scale
(horizontal axis, amu or ppm per division) and measuring the width of the
latter peak at the 5% abundance level over a 200-ppm range. The peak width
must not exceed 100 ppm (or 0.038 amu).
6.2.1.3 Confirm that the exact mass of m/z 380.9760 is within 5 ppm of
the required value.
6.2.2 GC Column Performance Check—
A GC column performance check mixture contains the known first and last
chromatographic eluters for each group of PCDD/PCDF congeners, such that all
of the congeners within a homologous series will elute between the first and
last eluters. In addition, the GC performance check mixture contains 2,3,7,8-
TCDD and several other TCDD congeners which elute close to 2,3,7,8-TCDD. This
solution is analyzed to establish the retention times at which the ions
monitored will be switched to a different set of ions, and also to determine
the chromatographic resolution between 2,3,7,8-TCDD and the closest eluting
TCDD congener. The GC column performance mix will be analyzed once at the
beginning of each 12-h analysis, after performing the mass resolution and
accuracy test described above.
6.2.2.1 Inject 2 yL of the GC performance check mixture (Table 3) and
acquire SIM data as described in Table 4.
6.2.2.2 Determine the chromatographic resolution between 2,3,7,8-TCDO
and the closest eluting TCDD peak. This is accomplished by the following
equation:
A-96
-------
Resolution (% valley) = (x * y) x 100
where: x = total height of the valley (from baseline) separating
2,3,7,8-TCDD and the closest eluting TCDD
y = total peak height (from baseline) of 2,3,7,8-TCDD
6.2.2.3 The resolution must be < 25%.
6.2.2.4 Determine the retention time (or scan number) of the first and
last eluter for each homologous series. Print out an RIC (reconstructed ion
chromatogram) for each of the five homologous series (Cl^ to C18) and label
each peak together with an "F" for the first eluter and an "L" for the last
eluter in the series. These retention times will be used to establish the
switching times for the SIM descriptors.
6.2.2.5 Allowable tolerance on the daily verification of the GC per-
formance check mixture will be ±10-s drift on the absolute retention times of
all components.
6.2.3 Instrument Calibration—
Before any samples can be analyzed, an initial five-point calibration
will be performed. This calibration will be verified at the beginning and end
of each 12-h period of sample analysis.
6.2.3.1 Initial calibration—Initial calibration is required before any
samples may be analyzed, but after all of the tests described above have been
successfully completed. Initial calibration 1s also required if any
continuous calibration check is not successful.
6.2.3.1.1 Analyze 2 yL of each of the five calibration solutions.
Note that prior to analysis, each solution must be spiked with the appropriate
amount of the recovery internal standards mix (50 pg/yL of i3C-i,2,3,4-TCDD
and 125 pg/yL of i3C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD).
6.2.3.1.2 Confirm that the ratio of the areas for each of the two
ions monitored for each homologous set of congeners and for the ^-labeled
internal standards are within the control limits indicated 1n Table A4-5.
6.2.3.1.3 Confirm that the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio for each
target compound is > 2.5.
6.2.3.1.4 Calculate the relative response factors (RRF) for each of
the 17 unlabeled PCDD/PCDF target analytes relative to the appropriate method
internal standards (surrogates) and for each of the 9 labeled PCDD/PCDF
internal standards relative to the appropriate recovery Internal standards.
6.2.3.1.5 Calculate the average RRF and the percent relative
standard deviation (RSD) for each target compound. For the initial
calibration to be acceptable, the % RSD of the average RRFs must be < 20%.
A-97
-------
TABLE A4-5. THEORETICAL ION ABUNDANCE RATIOS AND THEIR
CONTROL LIMITS FOR PCDDs AND PCDFs
Number of
Chlorine Ion Theoretical
Atoms Type Ratio
M
4 0.77
M+2
M+2
5 1.55
M+4
M+2
6 1.24
M+4
6(a) JL 0.51
M+2
700 0.4A
M+2
M+2
7 1.04
M+4
M+2
8 0.89
M+4
Control Limits
lower upper
0.65 0.89
1.24 1.86
1.05 1.43
0.43 0.59
0.37 0.51
0.88 1.20
0.76 Q.89
oaly for 13c.HxCDT >
-------
6.2.3.2 Continuing calibration—Continuing calibration must be conducted
at the beginning of each 12-h period of analysis after successful mass
accuracy and resolution GC resolution performance checks. Continuous
calibration is also required at the end of a 12-h shift, before the final mass
resolution and accuracy check. If the continuing calibration does not meet
criteria, the Initial calibration must be repeated and the samples reanalyzed
except as noted below.
6.2.3.2.1 Analyze 2 yL of the midlevel calibration solutions. Note
that prior to analysis, each solution must be spiked with the appropriate
amount of the recovery internal standards mix (50 pg/uL of 13C-1,2,3,4-TCDD
and 125 pg/yL of i3C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD).
6.2.3.2.2 Confirm that the ratio of the areas for each of the two
ions monitored for each homologous set of congeners and for the 13C-labeled
internal standards must be within control limits.
"6.2.3.2.3 Calculate the relative response factors (RRF) for each of
the 17 unlabeled PCDD/PCDF target analytes relative to the appropriate method
internal standards (surrogates) and for each of the 9 labeled PCDD/PCDF
internal standards relative to the appropriate recovery internal standards.
6.2.3.2.3.1 For the continuing calibration to be acceptable,
the RRFs must be within ±20% of the average RRF from the Initial calibration.
6.2.3.2.3.2 If the end-of-the-day continuing calibration check
standard has RRFs that are not within 20% but are within ±25% of the average
RRF from the curve, samples analyzed during that 12-h period will be calcu-
lated using the average RRF from the beginn1ng-of-day and the end-of-day stan-
dards.
6.2.3.2.3.3 If the end-of-day continuing calibration check
standard has RRFs that are not within 25% of the average RRF from the curve,
all positive samples analyzed during that 12-h period are Invalidated and must
be reanalyzed.
6.3 Sample Analysis
Samples may be analyzed only after the initial tuning and calibration
requirements have been met. In addition, a solvent blank must be analyzed
before any samples can be injected.
6.3.1 Adjust the volume of each sample to be analyzed to the final
amount.
6.3.2 Add recovery internal standards to each sample or portion thereof
such that there are 50 pg/yL of i3C-l,2,3,4-TCDD and 125 pg/yL of »3C-
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD.
6.3.3 Inject 2 yL of a hexane solvent blank. If the the blank contains
any of the 2,3,7,8-substituted congeners at more than 10% of the detection
limit, the results of all positive samples analyzed on that 12-h shift are
invalidated and will require reanalysis.
A-99
-------
6.3.4 Analyze 2 yL of each sample.
6.4 Data Reduction
Data reduction of each sample run consists of confirmation of target
compounds Identification and quantification of the compounds detected.
6.4.1 Documentation—
For each sample analyzed, the following documentation must accompany
analytical results for the purpose of their validation.
6.4.1.1 Reconstructed ion chromatogram (RIC) with a header
identifying the sample or standard by a unique laboratory designator.
6.4.1.2 Extracted current ion profiles (EICPs) for each compound
detected within the appropriate retention time window. For each compound,
there must be one EICP page which will include the name of the compound
monitored 1n the page header, and the following information. All peaks must
include scan numbers and areas found. The primary and secondary quantltation
ions must be printed together with the appropriate PCDPE Interferent 1on.
6.4.2 Compound Identification Criteria—
For a GC peak to be positively Identified as a PCDD/PCDF, it must meet
all of the following criteria:
6.4.2.1 For 2,3,7,8-substltuted congeners which have an equivalent
13C-labeled method or recovery Internal standard 1n the sample extract, the
retention times of the unlabeled congeners must be within -1 and +3 s of the
retention time of the equivalent isc-labeled congener.
6.4.2.2 For 2,3,7,8-substltuted congeners that do not have an
equivalent ^C-labeled congener in the sample extract, the relative retention
time (RRT) of the unlabeled congener must be within the established GC reten-
tion window for Its homologous series.
6.4.2.3 For non-2,3,7,8-subst1tuted congeners, the retention time
must be within the established GC retention window for Its homologous series.
6.4.2.4 The 1on current responses for the primary and secondary ions
used for confirmation and quantification purposes must reach their apex within
±2 s of each other.
6.4.2.5 The 1on abundance ratios of both Ions used for quantitative
purposes must be within the tolerance limits for the homologous series to
which the peak 1s assigned.
6.4.2.6 S1gnal-to-no1se ratios must be > 2.5 for compounds
tentatively Identified.
A-100
-------
6.4.2.7 Because polychlorinated diphenyl ethers (PCDPE) are a common
Interferent for analysis of PCDFs, the extracted ion current plot of the
corresponding PCDPE must have a S/N ratio < 2.5.
6.4.3 Quantification—
The amount of each 2,3,7,8-substituted congener included in the
calibration standards will be calculated together with total tetra- to octa-
PCDD/PCDFs using the formula:
c _
"
(area quantisation ion x amount internal standard [gg]j
(area internal standard x RRF average x amount extracted
°r
where: Cx = concentration [ug/g or yg/L] or total amount
found in the sample. If convenient, the units may be changed
to reflect the magnitude of the value of Cx.
RRFave e is the average RRF for each individual congener in
the calibration mixtures or is representative of the RRF for
that homologous group of congeners.
For congeners that belong to a homologous series con-
taining only one isomer (i.e., OCDD and OCDF) or only one
2,3,7,8-substituted congener (TCDDs, PeCDDs, HpCDDs and
TCDFs), the average RRF to be used will be the same as
that used for the individual compounds.
For congeners that belong to a homologous series con-
taining more than one 2,3,7,8-substituted congener (i.e.,
HxCDD, PeCDF, HxCDF, and HpCDF), the average RRF to be
used will be the mean of the average RRFs calculated for
the 2,3,7,8-substituted congeners representative of that
homologous series analyzed during calibration.
Please be sure to note Sections 6.2.3.2.3.1 to 6.2.3.2.3.3
for specific cases in which the average RRF from the curve
will not be used.
6.5 SU-846 Method Modifications, Deviations, and Enhancements
The following modifications, deviations, and enhancements from SW-846 and
other standard methods will be employed during this study. None are expected
to impact the quality of the results submitted.
6.5.1 Method 8290 specifies that before any samples are analyzed, a
method blank associated to the samples be analyzed. MRI will instead analyze
a solvent blank to confirm that there is no carryover in the chromatographic
system. If any method blank presents contamination problems, the specific
causes of the problem will be investigated and reported.
A-101
-------
APPENDIX A-5
TOC ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
A-103
-------
Geochemical and Environmental Research Group Page 1 of 6
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP-8907
TOTAL ORGANIC AND CARBONATE CARBON CONTENT OF
SEDIMENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Precise measurements of total organic and carbonate carbon are
necessary for interpreting trace organic contamination. Carbon
concentrations are determined on freeze-dried (or oven-dried at 40°
to 50°C) sediment using a LEGO Model 523-300 induction furnace (or
equivalent) to burn samples in an oxygen atmosphere. The carbon
dioxide that is produced is swept out of the furnace's combustion
chamber by the oxygen flow. The gases then pass through a dust trap
and two reaction tubes. The first of these is a two-stage chamber with
the first stage consisting of manganese dioxide. The manganese
dioxide absorbs the sulfur oxides that may have formed during
combustion. The second stage is made of anhydrone which removes
water vapor from the gas stream. The second tube, filled with
platinized silica, is maintained at an elevated temperature by an
external heating case. The contents of this tube act as a catalyst to
convert any carbon monoxide present into carbon dioxide. Carbon
dioxide is detected and quantified with a Horiba PIR-2000 infrared
detector. The output signal from the Horiba is sent to a HP 3396A
integrator which reports the quantity of carbon dioxide as a peak area.
Total organic carbon is determined after sample acidification.
Carbonate carbon is determined as the difference between total carbon
and total organic carbon.
2.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION, PRESERVATION AND STORAGE
2.1 Sample Collection
Sediment should be collected in precleaned and/or pre-
combusted (400°C) glass jars, or core liners and frozen (-20°C) in the
field.
2.2 Sample Preservation and Storage
Sediment samples are shipped frozen to the laboratory and
stored at -20°C until analysis. After subsampling excess sample is
archived at -20°C in the dark.
Rev. i November 1989
A-105
-------
Geochemlcal and Environmental Research Group Page 2 of 6
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP-8907
3.0 APPARATUS AND MATERIALS
3.1 Lab ware and Apparatus
The following labware and equipment is needed to perform the
total organic carbon and total carbon analyses:
Freeze Drier: Capable of freeze drying sediment at -40°C.
Mortar and Festal: 500-ml mortar or other suitable container.
LECO Model 523-300 Induction Furnace
Horiba PIR-2OOO Infrared Detector: Or other suitable detector.
HP 3396A Integrator: Or other suitable recorder/integrator.
Glass Measuring Scoop
Drying Oven: Capable of maintaining 40° to 50°C.
Analytical Balance: Capable of weighing to 1 ing.
Rotameter: Part No. 112-02, Cole-Parmer. Inc.
Plow Controller: Part No. 42300513. Veriflo Corp.
Note: Volumetric glassware for accelerator measurement and
analytical balances must be calibrated.
3.2 Reagents
The following reagents are required:
10% HC1 in Methanol (V:V)
LECO Iron Chip Accelerator: Part No. 501--077, Leco Corp.
LECO Copper Metal Accelerator: Part No. 501-263, Leco Corp.
LECO Combustion Crucibles
LECO Pin and Ring Carbon Standards: Range: 0.1 to 1.0% carbon.
Rev' i November 1989
A-106
-------
Geochemical and Environmental Research Group Page 3 of 6
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP-8907
4.O PROCEDURE
4.1 Leco System Preparation
The first step in operating the LECO furnace is to turn it on by
flipping all switches on the front panel to the "ON" (up) position. The
"Grid Tap Switch" should be set to the "MED" position. The
instrument then needs a warm-up period of at least 30 minutes. When
the furnace has had time to warm-up, close the oven on the right side
of the instrument (pedestal up) and open the valve on the oxygen tank;
set the regulator pressure to 40 psi. Open the toggle valve and allow
oxygen to flow through the system for 15 seconds and then check the
flow rate using the rotameter. Set to the 150 mark on the rotameter
tube with the knob on the flow controller to the right of the
rotameter. After 30 seconds of correct flow, zero the panel meter on
the front of the Horiba Infrared Analyzer. Set the Horiba Infrared
Analyzer detector range to 3, and the span to 0.
4.2 Total Carbon. Determination
4.2.1 Sample Preparation
Weigh 10 to 500 mg of freeze dried (or oven dried) sediment
into a tared crucible. The amount of sample depends upon the
expected carbon concentration. Ideally between 0.5 mg and 8.6 mg of
carbon should be combusted to fall within the range of the standard
curve.
Add one scoop each of the copper and iron chip accelerators to
all the weighed crucibles containing samples. All crucibles should be
kept covered with aluminum foil prior to analyses.
4.2.2 Sample Analyses
Place the crucible on the oven pedestal. Close the oven and start
the oxygen flow. Allow the oxygen to flow for 15 seconds and then
check the flow rate on the rotameter and adjust the flow, if needed.
After 15 seconds of correct flow, push the pedestal lever in to start
the induction furnace. At the same time push the "START1 button on
the HP integrator. About 20 seconds after the furnace is activated the
metals should begin to burn. After about another 20 seconds the
detector should begin to register carbon dioxide in the gas flow and
the integrator should begin to show a peak. At this point carefully pull
the lever out to turn the furnace OFF ~ be sure that you don't open the
Rev L November 1989
A-107
-------
Geochemical and Environmental Research Group Page 4 of 6
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP-8907
combustion chamber. Once the integrator has returned to baseline,
carefully open the oven and press STOP on the integrator. Use a pair
of large tweezers or tongs to take the hot crucible off the oven
pedestal and place it on a non-flammable heat-resistant surface to cool.
Repeat this procedure for all crucibles to be run.
4.2.3 Standard Analyses
Stardard Leco pin and ring carbon standards are placed into an
empty crucible with one scoop of the copper accelerator. Standards
are analyzed per the identical procedure as outlined in Section 4.2.2.
4.3 Total Organic Carbon Determination
4.3.1 Sample Preparation
Weigh an appropriate amount of freeze dried (or oven dried)
sample as per step 4.2.1 into a tared crucible. Add small amounts of
10% HC1 in methanol solution slowly to the sample until all bubbling
stops. Use a minimal amount of acid. Dry the treated samples
overnight at 50°C in the drying oven.
4.3.2 Sample Analyses
\
Combust and analyze as indicated in Section 4.2.2.
4.3.3 Standard Analyses
Standards are analyzed per the identical procedure as outlined
in Section 4.2.3.
4.4 Total Carbonate Carbon Content
Carbonate content is determined by subtracting the total organic
carbon concentration from the total carbon concentration. To express
as percent calcium carbonate, instead of total carbonate carbon
content, multiply this result by 8.33.
5.O STANDARDIZATION AND CALCULATIONS
Prior to combusting samples, a set of standards is run to
determine a standard curve. Standard curves vary slightly from day to
day.
Rev. 1 November 1989
A-108
-------
Geochemical and Environmental Research Group Page 5 of 6
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP-8907
5.1 To determine the curve, combust a set of five standards at
varying concentrations. Several standard rings and/or pins may need
to be run initially to bring the system to correct operating conditions;
the data collected will be discarded. The values of the standards in
the set should be selected to cover the 0.1 to 1.0% carbon range (1
gram basis).
5.2 A graphics package on a Macintosh (such as Kaleidagraph)
is used to make a graph of carbon percentage vs. integrator counts.
This software is used to determine a best fit equation for the data. R
should be no less than .99 or the data set should be discarded and
another set of five calibration points should be run and plotted. This
equation will be used to determine the carbon percentage of samples
for that day.
5.3 The counts reported by the integrator for a sample are
simply entered for X in the equation and Y becomes an intermediate
value. The Y value is divided by the sample weight in grams to
determine the percent carbon.
6.O QUALITY CONTROL
Quality control samples are processed in an identical manner as
the actual samples.
6.1 A method blank is run with every 20 samples, or with
every sample set, whichever is more frequent. Blank levels should be
no more than 3x method detection limit (MDL).
6.2 Duplicate samples are run every 20 samples, or with every
sample set. Duplicates should be ± 20% for low level (<1.0% carbon)
samples and ± 10% for normal/high level (>1.0% carbon) sample.
Duplicates may be somewhat less precise for very inhomogeneous
samples (i.e., peats, samples containing twigs, grasses, etc.).
6.3 Reference Materials: Leco pin and ring carbon standards
are run as reference materials and standards.
Rev. 1 November 1989
A-109
-------
Geochemical and Environmental Research Group Page 6 of 6
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP-8907
7.0 REPORTNG AND PERFORMANCE CRITERIA
7.1 Reporting Units
Reporting units are percent organic carbon (on a dry weight
basis) and percent carbonate carbon (on a dry weight basis).
7.2 Minimum Method Performance Criteria
The minimum method performance standard for the method is
detection of 0.02 percent carbon in a sample.
7.3 Significant Figures
Results are reported to two (2) significant figures.
7.4 Duplicate Analyses
All duplicate analyses are reported. Duplicate analyses are run at
least every 20 samples.
7.5 Reference Materials
Leco pin and ring carbon standards are analyzed as reference
materials and standards.
Rev. 1 November 1989
A-110
-------
ORGANIC CARBON, TOTAL
Method 415.1 (Combustion or Oxidation)
STORET NO. Total 00680
Dissolved 00681
1. Scope and Application
1.1 This method includes the measurement of organic carbon in drinking, surface and saline
waters, domestic and industrial wastes. Exclusions are noted under Definitions and
Interferences.
1.2 The method is most applicable to measurement of organic carbon above 1 mg/1.
2. Summary of Method
2.1 Organic carbon in a sample is converted to carbon dioxide (CO,) by catalytic combustion
or wet chemical oxidation. The CO2 formed can be measured directly by an infrared
detector or converted to methane (CH«) and measured by a flame ionization detector.
The Amount of CQj or CII4 is directly proportional to the concentration of carbonaceous
material in the sample.
3. Definitions
3.1 The carbonaceous analyzer measures all of the carbon in a sample. Because of various
properties of carbon-containing compounds in liquid samples, preliminary treatment of
the sample prior to analysts dictates the definition of the carbon as it is measured. Forms
of carbon that are measured by the method are:
A) soluble, nonvolatile organic carbon; for instance, natural sugars.
B) soluble, volatile organic carbon; for instance, mercaptans.
C) insoluble, partially volatile carbon; for instance, oils.
D) insoluble, paniculate carbonaceous materials, for instance; cellulose Fibers.
E) soluble or insoluble carbonaceous materials adsorbed or entrapped on insoluble
inorganic suspended matter; for instance, oily matter adsorbed on silt particles.
3.2 The final usefulness of the carbon measurement is in assessing the potential oxygen*
demanding load of organic material on a receiving stream. This statement applies
whether the carbon measurement is made on a sewage plant effluent, industrial waste, or
on water taken directly from the stream. In this light, carbonate and bicarbonate carbon
are not a part of the oxygen demand in the stream and therefore should be discounted in
the final calculation or removed prior to analysis. The manner of preliminary treatment
of the sample and instrument settings defines the types of carbon which are measured.
Instrument manufacturer's instructions should he followed.
Approved for NPDES
Issued 1971
Editorial revision 1974
415.1-1
A-lll
-------
4. .Sample Handling and Preservation
4.1 Sampling ami storage of samples in glass bottles is preferable. Sampling and storage in
plastic bottles such as conventional polyethylene and cubitainers is permissible if it is
established that the containers do not contribute contaminating organics to the samples.
NOTE 1: A brief study performed in the EPA Laboratory indicated that distilled water
stored in new. one quart cubitainers did not show any increase in organic carbon after
two weeks exposure.
4.2 Because of the possibility of oxidation or bacterial decomposition of some components of
aqueous samples, the lapse of time between collection of samples and start of analysis
should be kept to a minimum. Also, samples should be kept cool (4*Q and protected
from sunlight and atmospheric oxygen.
4.3 In instances where analysis cannot be performed within two hours (2 hours) from time of
sampling, Ihe sample is acidified (pH < 2) with HC1 or H,SO,.
5. Interferences
5.1 Carbonate and bicarbonate carbon represent an interference under the terms of this test
and must be removed or accounted for in the final calculation.
5.2 This procedure is applicable only to homogeneous samples which can be injected into the
apparatus reproducibly by means of a microliter type syringe or pipette. The openings of
the syringe or pipette limit the maximum size of particles which may be included in the
sample.
6. Apparatus
6.1 Apparatus for blending or homogenizing samples: Generally, a Waring-type blender is
Satisfactory.
6.2 A pparatus for total and dissolved organic carbon:
6.2.1 A number of companies manufacture systems for measuring carbonaceous
material in liquid samples. Considerations should be made as to the types of
samples to be analyzed, the expected concentration range, and forms of carbon to
be measured.
6.2.2 No specific analyzer is recommended as superior.
7. Reagents
7.1 Distilled water used in preparation of standards and for dilution of samples should be
ultra pure to reduce the carbon concentration of the blank. Carbon dioxide-free, double
distilled water is recommended. Ion exchanged waters are not recommended because of
the possibilities of contamination with organic materials from the resins.
7.2 Potassium hydrogen phthalate, stock solution, 1000 mg carbon/liter: Dissolve 0.2128 g
of potassium hydrogen phthalate (Primary Standard Grade) in distilled water and dilute
to 100.0 ml.
NOTE 2: Sodium oxalate and noetic acid are not recommended as stock solutions.
7.3 Potassium hydrogen phthalate, standard solutions: Prepare standard solutions from the
stock solution by dilution with distilled water.
7.4 Carbonate-bicarbonate, stock solution, 1000 mg carbon/liter: Weigh 0.3500 g of sodium
bicarb-nate and 0.4418 g of sodium carbonate and transfer both to the same 100 ml
volumetric flask. Dissolve with distilled water.
415.1-2
A-112
-------
7.5 Carbonate-bicarbonate, standard solution: Prepare n series of standards similar to itep
7.3.
NOTE 3: This standard is not required by some instruments.
7.6 Blnnk solution: Use the same distilled waier (or .similar quality water) used for the
preparation of the standard solutions.
8. Procedure
8.1 Follow instrument manufacturer's instructions for calibration, procedure, and
calculations.
8.2 For calibration of the instrument, it is recommended that a series of standards
encompassing the expected concentration range of the samples be used.
9. Precision and Accuracy
9.1 Twenty-eight analysts in twent'y-one laboratories analyzed distilled water solutions
containing exact increments of oxidizable organic compounds, with the following results:
Increment as Precision as Accuracy as
TOC Standard Deviation Bias, Bias,
ms/liter TOC. mg/liter % nig/liter
4.9 3.93 +15.27 4-0.75
107 g.32 -( 1.01 H-1.08
(FWPCA Method Study 3, Demand Analyses)
Bibliography
1. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Part 31, "Water", Standard D 2574-79, p 469 (1976).
2. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 14th Edition, p 532,
Method 505, (1975).
415 1-3
A-113
-------
APPENDIX A-6
DATA REDUCTION/INTERPRETATION
A-115
-------
APPENDIX A-6
DATA REDUCTION/INTERPRETATION
1.0 CEM DATA REDUCTION
Raw data were refined, as follows, to generate final data values (I.e.,
averages, etc.).
• The CEM raw data were first converted from percent of full-scale
values to percent (02 and C02) or ppm (CO and THC) values using a
data logging program. This conversion was based upon the average of
Initial and final zero and span calibration data.
• Hot THC data were corrected from a wet to a dry basis following
applicable EPA Method 4 (40 CFR 60) protocols. The volume of mois-
ture collected 1n the Method 0010 semivolatiles sampling train and
the associated dry gas metered volume were used to determine a
moisture content during each run.
• CO, hot THC, and cold THC data were corrected to 7K oxygen conditions
using the following formula: (uncorrected value) x (14/[21-02]) =
corrected value. Oxygen data collected during each run was used to
make this correction.
• At various points during each test, the THC analyzers were taken off-
line to zero and span the instrument. Available data points within
the sample period were utilized to interpolate 1-min rolling
averages, if necessary.
• Facility 02, CO, NOX, and THC data were recorded at varying time
Intervals during the pretest. Available data points within each
sample period were utilized to interpolate 1-min averages.
2.0 TOTAL ORGANIC MASS DATA REDUCTIONS/INTERPRETATION
In field GC data analysis, areas Integrated under each peak were summed
to give a total peak area for each run. This value was then divided by the
average dally reference factor for propane, resulting 1n a total organlcs
concentration for ppm propane equivalent. The average dally reference factor
was obtained from an average of peak areas for a standard propane sample of
known concentration.
Carbon fractions (I.e., Cl - C7 and C7 - C17 fractions) were determined
by comparing sample peak retention times to standard peak retention times.
A-117
-------
Aliquots of a C17 in a C7 solution were injected into the propane standard and
analyzed to establish standard peak retention times. The following standard
retention time ranges were determined in the test:
C1-C7 C7-C17
Main Duct: 0-153s Main Duct: 154-583s
Bypass Duct: 0-141.5s Bypass Duct: 142-572s
For gravimetric data reduction, method blank weight was subtracted from
each sample analysis value to determine a net gravimetric value. This net
value was then multiplied by a numerical factor to obtain the organic mass in
wg per sample. The dry standard sample volume was then utilized to generate a
w/L emission concentration. The ppm propane equivalent was then calculated by
assuming that half of the sample molecular weight has no FID response; cal-
culated as follows:
ug of sample n ,- 24.1 yl gas per umol of gas _ _nm nrnn,np
L of air sampled x °'5 x 44 uL propane per ymol propane ' ppm propane
3.0 ORE OF MONOCHLOROBENZENE
Monochlorobenzene concentrations in exhaust gas were determined and ORE
for each run was calculated 1n several ways as explained in Section 4.2.2 of
the Test Report. The following sample calculation shows the method of
calculation for the "best estimate" DRE.
An examination of the process data and analytical results from the POHC
levels in the bypass duct allows a calculation estimate of main duct POHC
levels, however. This estimate is based upon the proportional split of the
POHC with gas flow exiting the kiln.
Using stack flow rate measurements and organic levels in the bypass duct,
measured oxygen levels, and known material input rates, a material balance is
performed on the total kiln system. This allows calculation of the flow split
as gases exit the kiln entering either the bypass duct or ghe main flow
duct. The ratio of this split is then applied to the measured POHC level of
the bypass duct, resulting in the "best estimate" of expected POHC levels in
the main duct, and subsequent calculation of the DRE.
The calculation is divided up into 10 separate steps; Run 2 has been
shown for the example.
3.1 Step 1
An oxygen balance and a flow balance are performed on the bypass duct,
using a "known" oxygen level of 2.25% entering the duct. The "known" value is
obtained from measured CO levels and Figure A6-1, CO, and NO vs. oxygen in
kiln.
A-118
-------
2000-
6
a
a.
1000-
2 | 3 4
% OXYGEN IN KILN
Figure A6-1. CO and NO vs. oxygen 1n kiln,
A-119
-------
BFt = bypass flow into the duct at the end of the kiln (dscm/min),
- 2.25% 02
BF2 = bypass flow at sampling location (dscm/min), at 17.5% 02
BA = bypass air in (dscm/min), at 21% 02
Oxygen balance; BFj 02 + BA 02 = BF2 02
BF! (0.0225) + BA(0.21) = BF2 (0.175)
Flow balance: BFi + BA = BF2
BF2 was measured by MM5 data to be 668 dscm/min. Solving for BFt in the
flow balance equation, then:
BFj = 668 - BA
Substituting the numeric value of BF2 and the algebraic value of BFl into
the oxygen balance equation, BA and BF! are solved. Hence, the flow data
values are:
BFj = 125 dscm/min
BA = 543 dscm/min
BF2 = 668 dscm/min
Step 2; Steps 2 to 9 are performed to calculate the gas flow through the
kiln itself. An overall mass balance is done along with combustion reaction
stoichiometry.
Feeds;
Coal: 1.036 ton/h = 2,072 Ib/h
Liquid waste (LIQ): 3.565 ton/h = 7,130 Ib/h
Raw meal: 96.20 ton/h x .025 = 4,810 Ib/h (2.5% of the total mass
enters kiln as C02; rest is ignored for this calculation)
Chlorobenzene (Cl-B): 738 g/min = 98 Ib/h (spiked into kiln)
Combustion air (CA) = unknown quantity, yet sufficient to give
2.25% 02 at kiln exit
Step 3: Each feed stream is broken down into elemental quantities.
COAL:
Using ultimate analysis data as follows (0, 19.8; H, 5.5; C, 61.4; N,
1.5; Cl, 0.0; S, 0.6), sulfur content is dropped in the calcula-
tion...negligible presence.
For our mass input rate of 2,072 Ib/h coal,
0 410 Ib/h
H 114 Ib/h
C 1,274 Ib/h
N 31 Ib/h
A-120
-------
LIQ;
An ultimate analysis is assumed based on data from Combustion Gas
Velocity Measurement Manual, Trenholm and Klamrn, MRI, 1989 (C, 84; H,
10; Cl, 6).
For our mass input rate of 7,130 Ib/h,
C 5,989 Ib/h
H 713 Ib/h
Cl 428 Ib/h
C1-B;
Chemical structure yields (C, 64; H, 4.4; Cl, 31.6).
For our mass input rate of 98 Ib/h,
C 63 Ib/h
H 4 Ib/h
Cl 31 Ib/h
Meal:
CA:
Introduces C02 into the kiln at 4,810 Ib/h. C02 is (C, 27.2; 0,
72.7).
C 1,308 Ib/h
0 3,497 Ib/h
By mass, air is (0, 23.3; N, 76.7). The total mass input rate, CA, is
unknown.
0 .233 CA
N .767 CA
Step 4; The overall reaction is written, and combined feed totals are
converted to molar quantities.
C + H + 0 + N + Cl - C02 + H20 + HC1 + N2 + 02
C H 0 N Cl
COAL
LIQ
Meal
Cl-B
CA
1,272
5,989
1,308
63
™—
114
713
--
4
__
410
__
3,497
— —
.233 CA
31
428
31
.767 CA
Totals 8,632 831 3,907 + .233 CA 31 + .767 CA 459
A-121
-------
Mass - moles conversion, divide by molecular weight of each species
C 8,632 * 12 = 719 moles/h
H 831 * 1 = 831 moles/h
0 (3,907 -i- .233 CA) * 16 = 244 * .0146 CA moles/h
N (31 + .767 CA) * 14 = 2 + .0548 CA moles/h
Cl 459 * 35.5 = 13 moles/h
Step 5; The reaction is completed in molar quantities, balanced by the
reaction stoichlometry.
C - C02 719 moles/h C02
H - H20 (-)- HC1) 831 ~2 13 -i- 409 moles/h H20
N * N* 2 + f48 CA moles/h N2
0 * 02 (+ C02 + H20) (244 + .0146 CA) - 2(719) - 409 =
- 1603 Y0146 CA moles/h QZ
Step 6; We can now solve for CA the actual combustion air in, by using
the products formed and known, 2.25% 02 at the kiln exit.
moles 02
(dr*> * °* ' total dry moles x 10°
- 1603 + .0146 CA
.0225 =
.0225 =
- 1603 + .0141 CA .,,„.,,. 2 + T0548 CA
2 + /iy + 15 + 2
- 1603 + .0146 CA
- 1603 + .0146 CA -(- L438 + 26 + 2 + .0548 CA
- 1603 + .0146 CA
- 137 + .0694 CA
Cross-multiply: - 3.0825 + .0015615 CA = - 1603 + .0146 CA
1599.92 = .0130 CA
Solve: CA = 122,707 Ib/h (combustion air in) (CA originally defined as mass,
not moles)
Step 7; The total moles of products are calculated based on the
combustion air flow rate.
A-122
-------
(Dry basis) C02 = 719 moles/h
HC1 = 13 moles/h
N2 = , , 3,363 moles/h
02 - - 1603 * .0146 (122,707) , g, mo1es/h
Step 8: Volumetric flow is calculated based on molar flow (dry basis)
using the Ideal Gas Law.
PV = nRT __. fi.3
(14.7 psi) V = (4,298 moles/h) 10.73 j^e OR (528'R)
V = 1,656,467 dscf/h
Convert units,
V = 782 dscm/min
Step 9: Overall balance is performed at kiln exit/entry to bypass and
main flow ducts.
KF = BFi + MF
782 = 125 + MF
MF = 657 dscm/min
Step 10; The flow split is determined and ORE calculated.
% MF = 657/782 = 84%
% BFx = 125/782 =
OREs are then calculated using the flow split and emission in the bypass
duct as a basis.
Feed = 738 g/min
Bypass emission = .01016 g/min
84
"Theoretical" main duct emission = .01016 x = .05334 g/min
"Total" emission = .01016 + .05334 = .0635 g/min
In - Out
In x
738 - .0635
"Best estimate" ORE = In ". Out x 100
In
738
= 99.9914%
x 100
A-123
-------
APPENDIX B
SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS DATA
B-l
-------
This appendix presents data collected during the test at the Ash Grove
precaldner kiln. Data are presented as follows:
Content Page
B-l CEM Data Measured by Ash Grove B-5
B-2 Process Data Measured by Ash Grove B-17
B-3 Fuel/Waste Characterization B-21
B-4 Galbralth Lab Analysis Results B-33
B-5 CEM Data Measured by MRI B-39
B-6 Organic Mass Data B-83
B-7 Total Hydrocarbon and Total Organic Mass Data B-91
B-8 HC1 Data B-121
B-9 Volatile Organlcs Data B-155
B-10 Semi volatile Organlcs Data B-201
B-3
-------
APPENDIX B-l
CEM DATA MEASURED BY ASH GROVE
B-5
-------
OMAHA PLANT CEM DATA - BYPASS DUCT RUN 1
TIME 02 (%) NOx (ppm) CO (ppm) THC (ppm) OPACITY (%
1559.5 18.5 399 50 2 5.3
1604.5 18.7 416 16 2 3.8
1609.5 18.6 414 39 2 3.4
1614.5 18.5 400 69 6 3.4
1619.5 18.7 397 62 13 4.3
1624.5 18.6 412 44 7 3.4
1629.5 18.5 421 8 4 3.2
1634.5 18.5 415 23 3 4.1
1644.5 18.4 433 17 2 3.7
1649.5 18.2 396 58 3 3.1
1654.5 18.1 403 203 1 4.2
1659.5 18.5 404 -10 2 3.6
1724.5 18.5 385 33.4 2 3.9
1729.5 18.4 377 70 1 3.4
1734.5 18.1 351 421 4 4.2
1939.5 18.4 268 63 1 3.3
1744.5 17.9 273 91 1 4
174*.5 18.1 282 235 1 3.8
1754.5 18.3 313 -23 0 3.7
1759.5 17.9 246 133 -1 4.1
1804.5 17.8 297 1328 31 3.2
1809.5 18.3 304 92 3 3.7
1814.5 18.3 221 -9 1 3•*
1819.5 17.7 216 31 0 3.9
1824.5 17.8 254 53 1 3.7
1829.5 17.9 231 17 0 3.5
1834.5 17.8 224 21 0 3.5
1839.5 18 236 -2 0 3.6
1844.5 17.8 252 45 0 3.6
1849.5 17.8 248 28 0 3.6
1854.5 18 257 48 1 3.4
1859.5 18 258 73 14 3.6
1904.5 18 253 19 5 3.4
1909.5 17.8 267 79 5 3.4
1914.5 17.9 244 23 1 3.6
1919.5 17.8 282 96 0 3.8
1924.5 17.8 287 38 0 3.5
1934.5 17.7 281 73 2 3.5
1939.5 17.9 280 35 2 3.6
1944.5 17.9 289 39 1 3.7
1949.5 18.1 278 -6 2 3.5
1954.5 17.9 273 897 46 3.7
2004.5 18 289 25 2 4.1
Minimum- 18 216 -23 -1 3
Maximum- 19 433 1328 46 5
"verage= 18 312 108 4 4
B-7
-------
OMAHA PLANT GEM DATA - MAIN DUCT RUN 2
TIME 02 (%) NOx (ppm) CO (ppm) THC (ppm) OPACITY (%)
1159.2
1204.2
1209.2
1214.2
1219.2
1224.2
1229.2
1234.2
1239.2
1244.2
1249.2
1254.2
1259.2
1304.2
1309.2
1314.2
1319.2
1324.2
1329.2
1334.2
1339.2
1344.2
1349.2
1354.2
1359.2
1404.2
1409.2
1414.2
1419.2
1424.2
1429.2
1434.2
1439.2
1444.2
1449.2
Minimum=
Maximum=
Average=
4.7
3.9
3.9
4.0
4.4
4.6
4.3
4.4
4.1
4.2
4.4
3.9
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.7
4.5
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.0
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.4
4.4
4.2
4.5
4.0
4.2
4.1
4.4
4.6
4.2
3.9
4.7
4.3
532
377
373
389
470
480
430
435
413
428
454
338 .
503
486
477
478
514
483
418
431
440
401
456
419
419
454
470
432
466
389
431
412
457
493
443
338
532
443
445
1295
494
1251
635
530
685
1157
929
812
609
1330
536
517
549
553
398
620
875
1037
1024
1010
604
1001
694
528
523
781
523
1069
714
1018
690
474
781
398
1330
763
8
14
44
15
10
8
9
28
17
9
9
23
8
8
8
8
8
8
11
17
10
11
9
14
10
8
8
10
8
14
9
14
8
8
11
8
44
12
3.6
3.8
3.7
3.5
3.9
3.5
3.6
3.5
3.8
3.7
3.5
3.6
3.6
3.7
3.3
3.4
3.6
3.5
3.7
4.1
3.5
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.8
3.5
3.7
3.6
4.1
3.1
3.3
3.0
3.4
3.5
3.4
3.0
4.1
3.6
B-8
-------
OMAHA PLANT GEM DATA - BYPASS DUCT RUN 2
TIME 02 (%} NOX (ppm) CO (ppm) THC (ppm) OPACITY (%)
-1 3.7
-2 2.9
19 3.5
0 3.7
-1 3.7
-1 3.4
-1 3.5
0 3.6
0 3.4
1 3.5
-1 3.5
0 3.5
-1 3.4
9 3.8
4 3.5
2 3.5
-1 3.8
0 3.6
-1 3.6
1 4.0
0 3.5
0 3.4
-1 3.6
16 3.5
0 3.5
-1 3.4
-1 3.6
-2 3.9
-1 3.8
-1 3.4
-1 3.6
-1 3.5
-2 3.3
10 3.9
-2 2.9
19 4.0
1 3.6
1201.5
1206.5
1211.5
1216.5
1221.5
1226.5
1231.5
1236.5
1241.5
1246.5
1251.5
1256.5
1301.5
1306.5
1311.5
1316.5
1321.5
1326.5
1331.5
1336.5
1341.5
1346.5
1351.5
1356.5
1401.5
1406.5
1411.5
1416.5
1421.5
1426.5
1431.5
1436.5
1441.5
1446.5
•linimun-
teximuia=
Average-
17.6
17.5
17.3
17.7
17.6
17.6
17.6
17.4
17.4
17.4
17.7
17.5
17.6
17.5
17.3
17.5
17.4
17.5
17.3
17.2
17.5
17.4
17.4
17.3
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.4
17.4
17.5
17.4
17.4
17.7
17.5
17.2
17.7
17.5
763
758
716
789
750
668
707
624
646
627
663
679
709
704
708
729
768
736
775
710
756
785
742
715
751
719
721
690
738
771
754
726
726
758
624
789
723
ssssss:
10
10
301
47
29
20
24
233
115
190
19
46
12
84
72
166
21
17
45
307
88
5
135
355
39
36
7
89
38
95
42
113
21
116
5
355
87
B-9
-------
OMAHA PLANT GEM DATA - RUN 3 MAIN DUCT
TIME 02 (%) NOx (ppm) CO (ppm) THC (ppm) OPACITY
1139.2
1144.2
1149.2
1154.2
1159.2
1204.2
1209.2
1214.2
1219.2
1224.2
1229.2
1234.2
1239.2
1244.2
1249.2
1254.2
1259.2
1304.2
1309.2
1314.2
1326.5
1339.2
1346.5
1354.2
1401.5
1409.2
1416.5
1424.2
1431.5
Minimum=
Maximum=
Average=
4.5
4.4
4.2
4.5
4.6
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.6
4.8
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.3
4.7
4.7
4.7
5.1
4.2
4.8
5.0
4.9
4.9
5.0
5.0
4.9
4.9
4.6
4.5
4.2
5.1
4.7
466
472
469
476
488
464
482
495
493
501
492
501
521
473
536
528
525
587
486
550
564
530
545
565
546
532
529
514
509
464
587
512
470
401
375
371
331
354
349
348
327
318
314
308
297
384
303
294
279
265
311
284
279
282
284
260
295
296
323
367
324
260
470
324
7
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
5
5
6
6
6
5
6
5
5
7
6
3.3
3.2
2.7
2.9
3.3
2.8
3.0
3.0
3.3
3.0
3.2
3.0
3.6
2.6
3.0
3.1
3.2
3.0
3.6
3.4
3.0
3.7
3.0
3.2
3.4
2.6
3.8
3.4
2.9
2.6
3.8
3.1
B-10
-------
OMAHA PLANT CEM DATA - RUN 3 BYPASS DUCT
TIME 02 (%) NOx (ppm) CO (ppm) THC (ppm) OPACITY (%)
1141.5
1146.5
1151.5
1156.5
1201.5
1206.5
1211.5
1216.5
1221.5
1226.5
1231.5
1241.5
1246.5
1251.5
1256.5
1301.5
1306.5
1311.5
1316.5
1329.2
1341.5
1349.2
1356.5
1404.2
1411.5
1419.2
1426.5
Ninimum=
feximmn=
Average*
16.6
16.7
16.4
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.8
16.5
16.7
16.5
16.4
16.4
16.5
16.6
16.4
16.5
16.4
16.5
. 16.4
16.6
16.3
16.3
16.4
16.3
16.3
16.5
16.6
^»™"*"»--""— •• — **^IM •
16.3
16.8
16.5
1119
1173
1072
1181
1085
1105
1147
1101
1137
1047
1162
1139
1237
1277
1193
1253
1265
1200
1223
1203
1129
1213
1189
1156
1147
1244
1297
1047
1297
1174
37
25
116
14
82
1 6
18
70
19
22
T9
80
17
-3
1
58
-10
6
43
-14
24
-4
20
-7
36
25
-7
-14
116
25
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
-1
0
-1
1
0
3.1
2.8
3.5
3.4
3
3.1
3
2.9
2.9
3
3
3.1
3.1
3.2
3
3.1
2.5
3.5
2.8
3.3
3.2
3
3
3.3
3.2
2.7
3
2.5
3.5
3.1
B-ll
-------
OMAHA PLANT GEM DATA - RUN 4 MAIN DUCT
TIME 02 (%) NOX (ppm) CO (ppm) THC (ppm) OPACITY (%)
1138.2
1146.5
1151.5
1156.5
1201.5
1206.5
1211.5
1216.5
1549.2
1554.2
1559.2
1603.2
1609.2
1614.2
1619.2
1629.2
1634.2
1639.2
1644.2
1649.2
1654.2
1659.2
1704.2
1709.2
1714.2
1719.2
1724.2
1729.2
1734.2
1739.2
1744.2
1749.2
1754.2
1759.2
1804.2
1809.2
1814.2
1819.2
1824.2
1829.4
1834.2
1839.2
1844.2
1849.2
Minimum=
Maximum=
Average=
4.4
4.7
4.3
4.5
4.6
4.5
4.2
4.2
4.4
4.4
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.9
4.8
4.6
4.7
4.6
4.5
4.6
4.5
4.4
4.6
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.5
4.5
4.7
4.9
4.8
4.8
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.7
4.6
4.2
4.9
4.6
373
383
383
395 !
389
408
343
280
419
406
436
424
439
404
417
411
454
461
455
448
423
405
450
414
415
424
434
434
434
450
429
417
375
391
412
434
435
425
421
410
414
430
421
434
280
461
415
879
815
1502
1326
754
1246
1747
1501
1077
992
1047
877
830
1037
960
1153
855
947
977
1012
963
1137
1040
881
1182
1011
963
963
963
835
693
801
668
1090
763
690
1120
546
968
742
912
1059
798
896
546
1747
982
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
-1
4.3
4.1
4.1
4.3
4.6
4.2
4.8
3.7
4.8
3.8
4.3
4.8
4.5
4.8
5.5
4.3
4.8
4.6
5
4.7
4.8
4.2
4.2
3.9
4.5
4.4
4.2
3.8
4.8
4.6
4.2
4.3
4
4.2
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.4
4.1
4.6
4.5
4.4
4.3
4.4
3.7
5.5
4.4
B-12
-------
OMAHA PLANT GEM DATA - RUN 4 BYPASS DUCT
TIME 02 (%) NOX (ppm) CO (ppm) THC (ppm) OPACITY (%)
1141.5
1149.2
1154.2
1159.2
1204.2
1209.2
1214.2
1546.5
1551.5
1556.5
1601.5
1606.5
1611.5
1616.5
1621.5
1626.5
1631.5
1636.5
1641.5
1646.5
1651.5
1656.5
1707.5
1706.5
1711.5
1716.5
1721.5
1726.5
1731.5
1736.5
1741.5
1746.5
1751.5
1756.5
1801.5
1806.5
1811.5
1816.5
1821.5
1826.5
1831.5
1836.5
1841.5
1846.5
jHnimum=
jfaximum=
Average=
16.8
17.1
17
16.8
16.9
16.7
17
16.7
16.9
16.8
16.8
16.9
16.9
16.8
16.6
16.8
16.6
16.9
16.9
16.7
16.9
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.8
16.9
16.9
16.9
17.1
17
16.8
16.9
16.7
17.1
16.9
17
16.9
16.9
16.8
16.8
17.1
16.8
16.6
17.1
16.8
468
502
492
518
455
483
426
469
475
523
530
558
588
530
516
393
472
513
438
425
370
426
429
399
426
427
463
456
456
456
478
497
430
421
403
487
493
521
489
527
448
503
502
475
370
588
472
=====:
97
31
4
25
816
22
178
90
131
15
237
157
-3
174
537
3472
671
-4
200
61
246
309
208
510
165
381
20
-50
-50
-50
16
12
274
228
369
11
36
30
183
17
126
20
70
68
-50
3472
229
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-36
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-3
-36
-3
-4
4.2
3.6
4.2
3.8
4.2
4.3
4.5
5.1
4.6
4
4.5
5
4.6
5.4
4.3
4.8
4.2
4.7
4.6
4.3
4.1
4.7
4.1
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.5
4.3
4.5
4.7
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.7
4.2
4.3
4.5
3.6
5.4
4.4
B-13
-------
OMAHA PLANT GEM DATA - RUN 5 MAIN DUCT
TIME 02 (%) NOx (ppm) CO (ppm) THC (ppm) OPACITY
1124.2
1129.2
1134.2
1139.2
1144.2
1149.2
1154.2
1159.2
1204.2
1209.2
1214.2
1219.2
1224.2
1229.2
1234.2
1239.2
1244.2
1249.2
1259.2
1304.2
1309.2
1314.2
1319.2
1324.2
1329.2
1334.2
1339.2
1344.2
1349.2
1354.2
1359.2
1404.2
1409.2
1414.2
1419.2
1424.2
Minimum=
Maximum^
Average=
4.2
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.1
4.2
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.5
4.5
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.5
4.1
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.2
4.1
4.6
4.3
564
529
515
505
482
480
527
519
480
487
511
525
526
519
514
534
523
553
513
521
516
548
553
503
508
527
524
546
501
528
567
571
592
586
580
556
480
592
529
543
543
644
387
870
894
659
734
879
853
493
558
674
800
686
560
684
646
556
728
736
625
550
732
673
508
770
369
644
689
536
533
. 492
460
696
769
369
894
644
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
3.4
3.4
4.2
4.2
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.5
3.6
4.3
3.5
3.6
3.8
4.7
4.1
3.8
3.6
3.9
3.8
3.9
3.7
3.8
3.6
4.1
3.7
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.9
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.3
4.4
4.0
=====:===
3.4
4.7
3.9
B-14
-------
OMAHA PLANT CEM DATA - RUN 5 BYPASS DUCT
TIME 02 (%) NOX (ppm) CO (ppm) THC (ppm) OPACITY
1119.2
1126.5
1131.5
1136.5
1141.5
1146.5
1151.5
1156.5
1201.5
1206.5
1211.5
1216.5
1221.5
1226.5
1231.5
1236.5
1241.5
1246.5
1251.5
1256.5
1301.5
1306.5
1316.5
1321.5
1326.5
1331.5
1336.5
1346.5
1351.5
1356.5
1401.5
1406.5
1411.5
1416.5
1421.5
Minimum=
Maximum=
Average^
17.3
16.8
16.6
16.7
16.8
17.0
16.6
16.7
16.9
16.8
17.0
16.8
17.0
17.0
16.8
17.0
16.8
16.9
16.9
16.9
16.9
16.8
16.9
16.7
16.8
16.6
17.0
16.8
16.9
17.1
17.3
17.0
16.9
16.9
16.7
16.6
17.3
16.9
806
752
719
723
712
704
711
797
728
741
702
758
844
817
769
777
794
829
732
757
667
703
819
768
688
659
760
819
721
813
893
854
878
807
767
659.0
893.0
765.4
15
62
98
67
308
117
482
92
580
93
701
271
51
58
123
138
326
122
323
84
502
369
144
111
425
323
17
64
404
80
-11
-10
21
155
410
-11.0
701.0
203.3
0
0
1
1
1
1
2
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
0.0
2.0
1.6
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.5
3.5
3.6
3.4
4.3
4.2
4.1
3.9
4.4
4.3
4.0
4.1
4.1
3.7
4.0
3.9
4.3
4.1
3.4
3.6
4.4
4.0
3.5
4.0
4.1
3.9
3.9
3.7
4.2
4.4
3.4
4.4
3.9
B-15
-------
APPENDIX B-2
PROCESS DATA MEASURED BY ASH GROVE
B-17
-------
SUMMARY OF PROCESS DATA MEASURED BY ASH GROVE
5i'.' -\:"* Parameter "--•<•»• ^"^^
Raw Meal Kiln Inlet Temp
Entrance Kiln Gas Pressure
Kiln Coal Feed
Kiln Speed
Kiln Current
Exit Kiln Gas Pressure
Kiln Inlet Temp.
Raw Meal Feed
Liquid Hazardous Waste Feed
Solid Hazardous Waste Feed
Pyroclone Coal Feed
Pyroclone Temperature
Pyroclone Exhaust/Main ESP Inlet:
Temperature
Pressure
Bypass ESP Inlet Temp
Bypass ESP Voltage
First Stage
Second Stage
Third Stage
Fourth Stage Cyclone Temp
Bypass ESP Outlet
Temperature
Pressure
Bypass Quench Water
Damper Setting Open
^UoSr^
F
inHg
T/hr
RPH
Amps
inHg
F
T/hr
STPH
TPH
T/hr
F
F
inH20
F
kV
F
F
inHg
gpm
%
/ Raa,'M
1567
-0.112
0.993
113.7
178.2
-0.819
1974
98.11
2.874
0.925
7.974
1598
742.5
-28.03
696.8
36.1
32.6
27.2
1567
600.6
-3.074
6.0
50.0
LvfWRta*
1606
-0.124
1.036
112.2
228.1
-0.613
1883
96.20
3.565
0.925
7.704
1616
755.2
-28.04
695.8
36.6
30.3
27.8
1593
602.2
-2.567
8.0
40.1
- RunS*
1599
-0.142
5.140
112.2
244.2
-0.517
1939
95.00
0.000
0.000
7.273
1619
716.7
-26.81
692.1
35.9
34.3
27.5
1520
591.7
-2.639
8.0
40.0
" Run 4
1594
-0.161
0.000
104.5
226.2
-0.583
1565
95.38
5.789
0.000
7.358
1601
739.8
-28.08
694.0
36.3
29.6
28.1
1573
584.6
-2.908
8.0
40.0
Ran 5
1589
-0.139
0.049
110.2
258.9
-0.645
1831
96.71
5.756
0.000
7.156
1598
741.4
-27.65
711.4
34.8
29.3
28.2
1571
596.1
-2.508
8.0
40.0
B-19
-------
APPENDIX B-3
FUEL/WASTE CHARACTERIZATION
B-21
-------
NOTE: Waste samples were collected and analyzed by Ash Grove. An independent
contract laboratory also analyzed these samples. MR I had no control over the
quality assurance/quality control procedures Initiated and followed 1n the
sampling and analysis of these samples.
FUEL CHARACTERIZATION AND TEST SUMMARY
RUN#1 RUN #2 RUN #3 RUN#4 RUN #5
2.87 3.57
10080.00 10010.00
2.00 2.20
0.05
12300.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 5.79 5.76
0.00 11220.00 11170.00
0.00 1.70 1.70
KILN
Coal
Feed Rate (T/hr) 0.99 1.04 5.14 0.00
Heating Value (Btu/lb) 12300.00 12300.00 12300.00 12300.00
Chlorine (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Solid Waste
Feed Rate (T/hr) 0.93 0.93 0.00 0.00
Heating Value (Btu/lb) 8620.00 8410.00 0.00 0.00
Chlorine (%) 3.30 3.70 0.00 0.00
Liquid Waste
Feed Rate (T/hr)
Heating Value (Btu/!b)
Chlorine (%)
KILN HEAT INPUT RATE
(106Btu/h)
KILN Cl INPUT RATE
(Ib/h)
PYROCLONE
Coal
Feed Rate (T/hr) 7.97 7.70 7.27 7.36
Heating Value (Btu/lb)
Chlorine (%)
PYROCLONE HEAT INPUT RATE
(106Btu/h)
PYROCLONE Cl INPUT RATE
(Ib/h) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
108.15 123.66 139.09 142.90 142.77
193.61 247.84
0.00 216.51
215.27
7.16
12300.00 12300.00 12300.00 12300.00 12300.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
215.78 208.47 196.81 199.11
193.64
0.00
B-23
-------
THE PITTSBURG & MIDWAY COAL MINING CO.
EDNA MINE
TYPICAL ANALYSIS - AS RECEIVED
PROXIMATE ANALYSIS
% Moisture
% Ash
% Volatile
% Fixed Carbon
BTU
*% Sulfur
SULFUR FORMS
% Pyritic
% Sulfate
% Organic
Average
10.7
11.2
34.9
43.2
10800
0.6
0.1
0.0
0.5
Range
9.0-12.5
9.0-14.0
32.7-36.6
40.7-45.4
10600-11000
0.4-1.0
0.0-0.2
0.0-0.0
0.4-0.8
MINERAL ANALYSIS OF ASH
Silica, 3i02
Alumina, AU03
Titania, Ti02
Ferric Oxide, Fe20-
Lime, CaO
Magnesia, MgO
Potassium Oxide, K-0
Sodium Oxide, Na-0
Sulfur Trioxide, S03
Phos. Pentoxide, P20_
Undetermined
Average
51.0
31.2
0.8
5.4
4.9
1.4
0.9
0.5
2.5
1.3
0.1
Range
45.0-57.0
27.0-35.0
0.6-1.0
4.0-7.0
3.5-6.5
1.0-1.8
0.6-1.3
0.3-0.8
1.0-3.5
1.0-1.7
ASH FUSION TEMPERATURE (°F)
Reducing
Oxidizing
ULTIMATE ANALYSIS
% Moisture
% Carbon
% Hydrogen
% Nitrogen
% Chlorine
% Sulfur
% Ash
% Oxygen
10.7
61.4
4.3
1.5
0.0
0.6
11.2
10.3
9.0-12.5
57.7-64.6
4.1-4.5
1.4-1.6
0.0-0.0
0.5-0.7
9.0-14.0
9.7-10.8
Initial Deformation
Softening (H=W)
Softening (H-1/2W)
Fluid
Hardgrove Grindability
X Equilibrium Moisture
Alkalies as Na,,0 (dry
Free Swelling Index
2500
2600
2640
2685
coal)
2650
+2700
+2700
+2700
47
9.5
0.1
Nil
*Sulfur Dioxide (SO.) shall not exceed 1.2 pounds per million BTUs
on a monthly average basis.
B-24
-------
SUMMARY OF DATA FROM MRI TESTING
Oct./Nov. 1989
Samples tested
gample ID Description
#1031 10/28/89 Test #1 Liquid Chemfuel
*1033 10/28/89 Test II Solid Chemfuel (Spiked)
#2031 10/29/89 Test #2 Liquid Chemfuel
#2033 10/29/89 Test #2 Solid Chemfuel (Spiked)
#4031 10/31/89 Test #4 Liquid Cheafuel
#5031 11/02/89 Test #5 Liquid Chemfuel
Coal Coal sample typical during run .
Solid Composite sample of solids before spiking
Lab: Ash Grove
Louisville
Test Results
A&L Mid West Lab
Omaha
Ash Grove
Kansas City
IP.
#1031
#1033
#2031
#2033
#4031
#5031
Coal
Solid
BTU
10080
8620
10010
8410
11220
11170
12030
8640
£1
2.0
3.3
2.2
3.7
1.7
1.7
0.0
1.7
BTU
9299
8605
8839
8562
9941
10350
12137
8389
£1
1.51
0.99
1.69
1.06
1.15
0.89
<0.01
0.60
a
8.43
6.64
0.1
Monochlorobenzene
1
7.8
6.2
0.04
- Ac
B-25
-------
RESEARCH LABORATORY
ASH GROVE CEMENT COMPANY
KANSAS CITY, KANSAS
JANUARY 19, 1990
REPORT ON LOUISVILLE STACK TEST SAMPLES:
COMPOSITION AND MONOCHLOROBENZENE DETERMINATION
Samples Received:
Sample No. Identification Date Received Requested By
S-891206 #1033 10/28/89 12/15/89 R. Behrns
S-891207 #2033 10/29/89 " "
S-891208 Solid Chemfuel " "
s-891209 Monochlorobenzene " "
S-891223 #1031 10/28/89 12/28/89 "
S-891224 #2031 10/29/89 " "
S-891225 #4031 10/31/89 " "
S-891226 #5031 11/2/89 " "
The above samples were received with a request for
determination by capillary gas chromatography of the amount of
monochlorobenzene in all samples (except the monochlorobenzene,
S-891209, which was included for a reference standard) . The
results of this determination are given in Table I attached.
An organic screen for the most abundant constituents in the
sample marked "solid chemfuel" (S-891208) was also requested. The
liquid chemfuel burned during the stack test (S-891223 - S-891226)
was composited and analyzed for organic constituents also. These
results are given in table II attached.
Finally Table III attached gives an analysis of "solid
chemfuel" (S-891208) for water, volatile organic, non-volatile
extractable organics, non-volatile non-extractable organics, and
inorganic ash.
Tested and reported by,
Dan Logan
DJL:lm Chemist
cc: G.D.J.
E.R.H.
D.R.Y.
W.E.W.
R. Behrns
R & E
B-26
-------
TABLE I
DETERMINATION OF MONOCHLOROBENZENE (MClBz)
IN LOUISVILLE STATE TEST SAMPLES
g-Number Louisville Date Sample Type
% MClBz bv Wt.
S-891206 #1033
S-891207 #2033
S-891208
S-891223 #1031
S-891224 #2031
S-891225 #4031
5-891226 #5031
10/28/89 Spiked Solid Chemfuel 7.8%
(S = ± 0.9, n = 3)
10/29/89 " " " 6.2%
(S = ± 0.9, n = 3)
Solid Chemfuel " 0.04%
(Single Determination)
10/28/89 Liquid Chemfuel N.D. (<0.1%)
10/29/89
10/31/89 "
11/2/89
N.D. (<0.1%)
N.D. (<0.06%)
N.D. (<0.08%)
B-27
-------
TABLE II
ANALYSIS OF ORGANICS IN CHEMFUEL AND SOLID CHEMFUEL
FROM LOUISVILLE STACK TESTS
Compound Determined Louisville Chemfuel Louisville Solid Chemfuel
Composite: S-891223, S-891208
_. S-891224,1225. 1226 .__
%Q.
•&
Residue* 7.4 48.
Water 11. 16.
Stoddard Solvent 8.8 0.04
Xylenes 4.7 1.9
Toluene 3.5 2.0
Methyl Isobutyl Ketone 1.4 1.0
Isopropyl Alcohol 2.3 .08
VHP Naptha 4.6 .02
Methyl Ethyl Ketone 2.2 .23
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 0.76 .17
Trichloroethylene 0.87 .19
Methylene Chloride 1.6 .03
Ethyl Alcohol 0.86 .01
2-Nitropropane 0.96 . .15
n-Hexane 0.61 .10
Tetrachloroethylene 0.24 .84
Heptane 3.1 .47
Chlorobenzene N.D.(<0.1) .04
Acetone 2.7 .03
Undetermined** 42. 29.
* Nonvolatile (100°C, 3 hours), non-extractable
(into Methyl Isobutyl Ketone) residue.
** Includes oil, grease, and unidentified solvents
B-28
-------
TABLE III
CHARACTERIZATION OF SOLID CHEMFUEL S-891208
Water 16.1% by Weight
Volatiles* 37.4% by Weight
(including water)
Extractable** 14.8% by Weight
Nonvolatile
Organic Residue
Non-Extractable 21.9% by Weight
Nonvolatile
Organic Residue
Inorganic 25.9% by Weight
ASH***
* 100°C for 3 hours
** Methyl Isobutyl Ketone (M.I.B.K.) has been found to be the best
solvent for extracting. Sample extracted 4 times with 20 ml M.I.B.K,
*** ASTM D 482 (775°C muffle furnace)
B-29
-------
A&L MID WEST LABORATORIES, INC.
13611 "B" STREET • OMAHA, NE 68144 • (402) 334-7770
REPORT NUMBER: 0-010-1500
(Additional results 1-24-90)
Ash Grove Cement Company #12465
Roger J. Behrns
P. O. Box 609
Louisville, NE 68037
1-10-90 M i
Subject: Environmental Analysis
Date Received: 12-15-89
Laboratory Sample
Number Identification
33701 Test #1, Liquid Chemfuel
10-28-89
33702 Test #1, Solid Chemfuel
(spiked) 10-28-89
33703 Test #2, Liquid Chemfuel
10-29-89
33704 Test #2, Solid Chemfuel
(spiked) 10-29-89
Analysis
BTU/lb
Chloride
BTU/lb
Chloride
Monochlorobenzene
BTU/lb
Chloride
BTU/lb
Chloride
Monochlorobenzene
Level Found
9299 BTU/lb
1.51%
8605 BTU/lb
0.99%
84300 Hg/g
8839 BTU/lb
1.69%
8562 BTU/lb
1.06%
66400
Detection
Limit-
Method
ASTMD240
0.01% as Chloride ASTMD1317-118
ASTMD240
0.01% as Chloride ASTMD1317-118
SOOjig/g
ASTMD240
0.01% as Chloride ASTMD1317-118
ASTMD240
0.05% as Chloride ASTMD1317-118
1000
Note: < = less than
Respectfully submitted,
( I\
Christine W. Birt
Client Services Representative
Dedicated Exclusively to Providing Quality Analytical Services
Our reports and letter snretoi the exclusive and conlidential use ot our clients e i«»*"M^. ov \^° «~nu\^any >« a"^ ad\]Pr'i^'lrt'vi\ewe; «ol*i^s,e-ci» ^»^n. ^\iV-»Vv- ^"«"v\c\c.ev ^- -MVVV^W* "•-*~««tx
-------
A&L MID WEST LABORATORIES, INC.
13611 "B" STREET • OMAHA, NE 68144 • (402) 334-7770
REPORT NUMBER: 0-010-1501
(Additional results 1-24-90)
Ash Grove Cement Company #12465
Roger J. Behrns
P. O. Box 609
Louisville, NE 68037
Laboratory Sample
Number Identification
Analysis
CD
33705
33706
Test #4, Liquid Chemfuel BTU/lb
10-31-89 Chloride
Test #5, Liquid Chemfuei BTU/lb
11-2-89 Chloride
33707
33708
Comment:
Coal sample typical
during run
Composite sample of
solids before spiking
BTU/lb
Chloride
BTU/lb
Chloride
Moonochlorobenzene
Level Found
9941 BTU/lb
1.15%
10350 BTU/lb
0.89%
12137 BTU/lb
< 0.01%
8389 BTU/lb
0.60%
1000 ng/g
1-10-90 M i
Subject: Environmental Analysis
Date Received: 12-15-89
Detection
Limit
0.01% as Chloride
0.01% as Chloride
0.05% as Chloride
0.01% as Chloride
1000 Hg/g
Method
ASTMD240
ASTMD1317-118
ASTMD240
ASTMD1317-118
ASTMD240
ASTMD1317-118
ASTMD240
ASTMD1317-118
A relatively low level of monochlorobenzene was detected in this sample. Normally, the sample would have been rerun
at a lower detection limit. In this case, however, there were too many other high-level compounds (toluene, ethylbenzene,
xylenes, etc.) present to permit this.
Respectfully submitted,
Note: < = less than
ristine W. Birt
Client Services Representative
Dedicated Exclusively to Providing Quality Analytical Services
Our reports and letters are lor the exclusive and confidential use ol our clients and may not be reproduced in whole or in part, nor may any reference be made
to the woi k, tlie results. 01 the company in any advei Using, news iclease, or olhei public announcements without obtaining our prior written authorization.
-------
APPENDIX B-4
TOC AND INORGANIC COMPOUND ANALYSIS RESULTS
B-33
-------
HARRY W GALBRAITH. PM.O
CHAIRMAN OF TNI IDAHO
KCNNCTH S. WOODS
PflCdDINT
GAIL R. HUTCHENS
CXCCUTIVI VICC. PRKIIDCNT
VELMA M. RUSSELL
KCRCTAMr/TRCAlimcR
P.O. BOX 91610
KNOXVILLE. TN 379SO-I610
J-aljoiatoiLs.1, Unc.
QUANTITATIVE MICROANALYSES
ORGANIC -. INORGANIC
613/546-1333
2323 SYCAMORE DR.
KNOXVILLE. TN 3792I-I73O
Ms. Deann R. Williams
Midwest Reserach Institute
425 Volker Boulevard
Kansas City, Kansas 64110
February 1, 1990
Received: January 9th
PO#: 108796
Dear Ms. Williams:
Analysis of your compounds gave the following results:
Your #,
1022
1023
5022
Our#,
J-5057
(1-7007)
J-5058
(1-7012)
J-5059
(1-7011)
Analyses,
ppm Potassium < 0.2
mg/liter NHa as Nitrogen 57.6
mg/liter Chloride 14.9
mg/liter Potassium < 0.24
mg/liter NHS as Nitrogen 0.77
mg/liter Chloride < 1
mg/liter NH» as Nitrogen 59.39
59.36
There is no charge for these repeat analyses.
Sincerely yours,
GALBRAITH LABORATORIES, INC.
R. Hutchens
Exec. Vice-Presiden
GRH:sc
B-35
*R AND SHIPMENTS BY U.S. MAIL • P.O. SOX SI«1O. KNOXVILLE. TN 37«BO-I«IO. OTHER CARRIERS • 2323 SYCAMORE ON. KNOXVILLE. TN 3792I-I7SO
ESTABLISHED I»SO
-------
HARRY W. OALBRAITH. PH D
KENNCTH S. WOODS
PMCSIOINT
GAIL R. HUTCHEN3
ICCUTIVC VICE. PMCSIOKNT
VELMA M RUSSELL
, U
nc.
P.O. BOX 51610
KNOXVILLE. TN 379SO-16IO
QUANTITATIVE MICROANALYSES
ORGANIC - INORGANIC
615/348-1333
2323 SYCAMORE OR.
KNOXVILLE. TN 37921-175O
Ms. Deann R. Williams
Midwest Research Institute
425 Volker Boulevard
Kansas City, Missouri 64110
December 7, 1989
Received: November 13th
P0#: 108796
Dear Ms. Williams:
Analysis of your compounds gave the following results:
Our #, % Total Carbon,
Your #,
1030
2030
3030
4030
5030
1-7002
1-7003
1-7004
1-7005
1-7006
9.57
9.90
9.66
9.56
9.87
9.71
% Inorganic
Carbon,
10.15
10.90
9.96
9.81
9.98
9.85
% Total
Organic Carbon
less than 0.5
less than 0.5
less than 0.5
less than 0.5
less than 0.5
less than 0.5
B-36
LETTER AND SHIPMENTS BY U.S. MAIL • P.O. BOX 51SIO, KNOXVILLE. TN 3795O-I6IO. OTHER CARRIERS • 3333 SYCAMORE DR. KNOXVILLE. TN 37931-1790
CSTASLISHED 1SSO
-------
Ms. Deann R. Williams
Page 2
December 7, 1989
Your #,
Our #,
ppm Potassium, mg/liter NH3
as Nitrogen,
mg/liter Chloride,
1022
2022
3022
4022
5022
1023
2023
3023
4023
5023
1024
1025
1-7007
1-7008
1-7009
1-7010
1-7011
1-7012
1-7013
1-7014
1-7015
1-7016
1-7017
1-7018
less than 1
less than 1
less than 1
less than 1
less than 1
less than 1
less than 1
less than 1
less than 1
less than 1
1.2
less than 1
44.2
27.4
29.0
48.8
• *»•..
0.42
0.58
0.22
0.28
0.066
0.18
0.18
0.15
12.51
11.8
6.96
41.71
42.8
1.30
2.27
2.20
1.59
less than
less than
less than
20*
0.4
0.4
* We regret that there was too much interference for a lower
determination.
B-37
OALBRAITH LABORATORIES. INC.
-------
Ms. Deann R. Williams
Page 3
December 7, 1989
Your #,
21889
21890
Our |,
1-7019
1-7020
mg/ liter
Potassium,
4160
43.9
mg/ liter
NHa as
Nitrogen,
0.11
0.092
mg/liter
Chloride,
3 "45
35.4
See Raw Data package for information on TOC values,
Sincerely yours,
GALBRALTH LABORATORIES, INC.
I
Gail R. Hutchens
Exec. Vice-
•Preside!
GRH:sc
B-38
GALBRAITH LABORATORIES. INC.
-------
^__^_
UCKU
Geochemical and Environmental Research Group
Ten South Graham Road
College Station, Texas 77840
TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY
Telephone: (409) 690-0095
FAX: (409) 690-0059
TELEX: 910-380-8722
Scott Klamm
Midwest Research Institute
425 Volker Blvd.
Kansas City. MO
Dear Scott:
Enclosed are TOG analysis results for the industrial cement kiln
study (per GERG SOP-8907). These samples were particularly difficult
to analyze and the following comments should be noted. A number of
samples could not be dried even after several days of exposure in a
recirculatlng oven at 50°C. This affected our ability to obtain an
accurate sample weight and apparently the samples were moist with
something other than water. The values on many samples approach
the detection limit of the method (-0.05%). The samples were
inhomogenous causing more than usual scatter in replicate analyses.
Average TOC values are reported for each sample with replicates
provided for the samples as requested. If you have any questions,
please call.
Sincerely yours.
e.
Mahlon C. Kerinicutt II. Ph.D.
Associate Research Scientist
MCK/dep
enclosure
B-38a
-------
Table 1. Total organic carbon content of Industrial cement kiln
samples.
Sample I.D. TOG (%)
1037 0.10
2037 0.10
3037 0.04
4037 0.07
5037 0.06
B-38b
-------
APPENDIX B-5
CEM DATA MEASURED BY MRI
B-39
-------
NOTE: No significant problems were encountered with the CEM systems. All
tests fell within the appropriate range for zero and calibration drift, and
all final leak checks were passed.
The nitrogen bias sampling line was not correctly connected during test
runs 2, 3, and 4, Invalidating the nitrogen bias data collected. The ambient
air sampling line was Inappropriately connected during test run 5,
Invalidating data.
Times recorded 1n the field were 1n error during portions of the test.
Because of a time change (I.e., daylight savings time change) and computer
equipment changes during the test, analog times were recorded Incorrectly.
Reported times were corrected Immediately following the test; sampling train
data and field notes were utilized to determine appropriate time designations
to be reported with CEM data. Appendix 8 notes the changes made to time
analogs.
B-41
-------
RUN 1 - 02, CO2, CO
TIME
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
DECIMAL
TIME
15.80
15.82
15.83
15.85
15.87
15.88
15.90
15.92
15.93
15.95
15.97
15.98
16.00
16.02
16.03
16.05
16.07
16.08
16.10
16.12
16.13
16.15
16.17
16.18
16.20
16.22
16.23
16.25
16.27
16.28
16.30
16.32
16.33
16.35
16.37
16.38
16.40
16.42
16.43
16.45
16.47
16.48
16.50
16.52
16.53
16.55
16.57
16.58
16.60
16.62
16.63
16.65
16.67
16.68
16.70
16.72
16.73
16.75
16.77
16.78
16.80
16.82
16.83
16.85
16.87
16.88
16.90
16.92
02
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.8
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.7
4.3
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.0
4.2
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.4
4.5
4.3
4.0
3.7
3.9
4.3
4.4
4.3
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.4
4.7
4.9
4.9
4.7
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.1
4.1
4.3
4.5
4.1
4.0
4.2
4.3
4.2
3.9
3.8
3.9
3.9
4.0
4.1
C02
(X)
32.6
32.4
32.3
32.0
31.9
31.7
31.7
31.6
31.7
32.4
33.1
33.5
33.5
33.4
33.6
33.5
33.4
33.5
33.7
33.7
33.6
33.3
33.1
33.1
33.4
34.0
34.1
33.8
33.2
33.1
33.3
33.5
33.4
33.6
33.6
33.6
33.5
32.8
32.4
32.0
32.1
32.6
32.8
33.0
33.3
33.4
33.5
33.3
33.3
33.2
33.0
33.1
33.2
33.5
33.5
33.8
33.4
33.2
33.8
33.8
33.4
33.4
33.7
33.9
34.0
33.9
33.7
33.8
3800
3916
4158
6112
6898
7953
5548
3142
1763
1274
1107
842
692
601
593
544
520
471
501
492
443
394
373
361
353
715
1409
1005
551
383
357
386
397
407
441
451
417
362
346
334
416
451
404
384
361
338
330
322
369
400
504
393
338
426
411
374
366
395
511
605
624
676
MAIN DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
AT 7X 02 ROLLING
AVERAGE
3218
3347
3571
5269
5942
6907
4834
2727
1516
1068
913
697
575
494
494
447
429
388
412
407
370
332
316
303
290
580
1155
841
465
322
297
320
328
337
365
374
352
311
308
304
301
298
295
292
289
277
347
378
340
326
305
286
277
267
306
334
427
326
278
354
344
312
300
321
419
496
515
560
970
922
872
817
735
643
536
464
428
02
(X)
18.7
18.7
18.6
18.5
18.4
18.4
18.5
18.5
18.7
18.7
18.6
18.6
18.6
18.5
18.6
.18.6
18.7
18.7
18.6
18.6
18.7
18.7
18.8
18.8
18.6
18.5
18.6
18.7
18.7
18.7
18.7
18.6
18.6
18.7
18.6
18.6
18.7
18.8
18.9
18.9
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.7
18.8
18.8
18.8
18.7
18.6
18.6
18.6
18.7
18.7
18.6
18.5
18.5
18.5
18.5
C02
(X)
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
BYPASS DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
AT 7X 02 ROLLING
(ppm) (ppn) AVERAGE
-1
-1
0
-0
5
4
4
1
0
1
4
5
2
1
2
5
3
2
1
1
-1
-0
-2
-3
-0
6
7
5
-1
-3
-3
•1
0
-7
-3
2
-2
27
23
20
3
1
8
25
30
14
8
14
30
18
11
5
5
-8
-1
-11
-16
-2
31
43
30
-7
-17
-17
-4
1
2
4
5
6
8
9
11
12
14
15
17
10
14
8
-3
3
9
3
2
9
8
10
-7
-10
-5
-11
-3
9
-8
3
-1
1
-3
22
10
7
7
7
7
7
6
6
6
6
B-42
-------
TIME DECIMAL
1656
1657
1658
1659
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
174]
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1800
1801
1802
1803
TIME
16.93
16.95
16.97
16.98
17.00
17.02
17.03
17.05
17.07
17.08
17.10
17.12
17.13
17.15
17.17
17.18
17.20
17.22
17.23
17.25
17.27
17.28
17.30
17.32
17.33
17.35
17.37
17.38
17.40
17.42
17.43
17.45
17.47
17.48
17.50
17.52
17.53
17.55
17.57
17.58
17.60
17.62
17.63
17.65
17.67
17.68
17.70
17.72
17.73
17.75
17.77
17.78
17.80
17.82
17.83
17.85
17.87
17.88
17.90
17.92
17.93
17.95
17.97
17.98
18.00
18.02
18.03
18.05
02
(X)
4.3
4.3
3.9
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.4
4.6
4.7
4.6
4.4
4.3
4.5
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.3
4.6
4.7
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.0
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.3
4.4
4.6
4.3
4.1
4.3
4.3
3.9
3.8
3.9
4.2
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.3
4.1
3.9
3.7
4.0
4.4
4.5
4.2
3.8
3.7
3.9
4.0
3.9
4.2
4.3
4.1
4.0
4.1
4.1
4.5
4.7
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.8
4.5
C02
(X)
33.5
33.1
33.3
33.9
34.2
34.1
33.6
33.2
32.7
32.7
32.9
33.3
33.4
33.2
33.1
33.0
33.0
33.3
33.5
32.8
33.0
33.4
33.6
33.7
33.7
34.1
34.4
34.2
33.9
33.5
33.1
33.0
33.5
33.6
33.4
33.7
34.3
34.5
34.0
33.7
33.9
34.0
33.8
33.2
33.6
34.3
34.3
33.6
33.1
33.1
33.7
34.3
34.5
34.2
34.2
34.3
33.8
33.7
33.9
34.2
33.9
33.7
32.9
32.9
33.6
33.3
32.9
32.6
572
476
422
485
908
887
709
510
382
341
336
348
368
374
366
333
307
303
307
317
298
302
340
367
392
355
424
514
450
413
370
337
324
431
422
389
463
764
793
538
479
513
555
494
449
734
1215
1515
682
474
432
697
1443
1268
702
622
577
457
412
456
587
514
478
380
427
460
403
366
AT 7X02
2
1
1
2
3
8
13
14
8
3
2
1
-1
•1
-0
-2
-1
-1
1
3
-1
28
59
54
40
30
21
13
12
11
8
4
2
8
7
4
10
17
23
19
14
13
14
10
7
15
37
67
51
31
18
13
14
16
14
12
9
6
4
9
21
20
16
8
7
5
2
1
AT 7X 02
13
8
7
10
14
40
67
73
42
16
13
4
-8
-7
-1
-11
-4
-5
8
14
-5
150
308
277
207
159
112
69
63
58
41
20
12
43
40
24
54
84
113
94
72
66
71
55
40
79
182
326
256
162
96
67
72
79
64
58
42
30
18
44
101
99
78
43
37
26
13
6
B-43
-------
MAIN OUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
TIME
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
T833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
1908
1909
1910
1911
DECIMAL
TIME
18.07
18.08
18.10
18.12
18.13
18.15
18.17
18.18
18.20
18.22
18.23
18.25
18.27
18.28
18.30
18.32
18.33
18.35
18.37
18.38
18.40
18.42
18.43
18.45
18.47
18.48
18.50
18.52
18.53
18.55
18.57
18.58
18.60
18.62
18.63
18.65
18.67
18.68
18.70
18.72
18.73
18.75
18.77
18.78
18.80
18.82
18.83
18.85
18.87
18.88
18.90
18.92
18.93
18.95
18.97
18.98
19.00
19.02
19.03
19.05
19.07
19.08
19.10
19.12
19.13
19.15
19.17
19.18
02
(X)
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.9
3.7
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.0
4.0
4.2
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.0
3.8
4.0
4.2
4.2
3.7
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
4.1
4.5
4.7
4.6
4.4
4.0
3.9
4.2
4.3
4.2
4.5
4.6
4.3
4.0
4.0
3.9
4.3
4.5
4.5
4.3
4.1
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.9
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.5
4.6
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.4
4.4
C02
(»
33.4
34.3
34.4
34.4
34.3
34.4
34.6
34.5
34.5
34.3
33.9
33.9
33.9
33.8
34.1
34.0
33.6
33.3
33.4
33.6
33.7
33.3
34.0
34.1
34.0
33.5
33.3
34.6
34.3
34.6
34.6
34.3
33.5
32.9
32.5
32.7
33.2
33.7
33.9
33.9
33.6
33.5
32.9
32.9
33.6
34.0
34.0
34.1
33.4
33.2
33.0
33.4
33.8
34.0
34.1
34.2
34.1
33.5
33.4
33.4
33.3
33.0
33.0
33.5
33.8
33.9
33.8
33.5
(ppn)
348
837
1211
993
1216
2461
8054
5736
2526
1926
1155
660
478
489
490
467
448
404
421
428
448
454
638
742
515
501
876
2807
3739
1696
1090
631
436
355
341
356
389
504
468
428
415
377
346
394
503
455
529
447
344
312
329
418
465
606
655
638
484
376
356
355
369
355
355
364
378
372
340
AT 7X 02
(ppn>
285
679
986
812
982
1958
6458
5572 *
4686
2075
1593
961
550
394
402
407
394
378
338
350
356
369
370
524
619
428
406
698
2246
3013
1373
903
535
375
303
288
294
319
419
393
357
352
322
290
325
415
373
444
379
292
262
272
345
381
496
536
531
405
315
298
302
315
298
295
302
314
314
286
ROLLING
AVERAGE
424
430
442
450
462
489
591
680
753
784
806
817
822
825
827
828
829
831
831
829
829
829
830
834
840
841
842
849
880
919
931
939
941
940
938
936
935
930
920
906
902
901
901
896
882
871
868
867
865
864
862
861
858
857
859
862
865
865
865
865
865
859
847
839
827
800
698
610
BYPASS DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
02
(X)
18.2
18.0
17.9
17.8
17.8
17.6
17.5
17.7
17.9
18.0
18.0
18.1
18.2
18.3
18.3
18.3
18.5
18.5
18.4
18.3
18.3
18.2
18.1
18.2
18.3
18.3
18.3
18.1
18.0
18.0
18.0
18.2
18.4
18.5
18.4
18.4
18.2
18.1
18.2
18.3
18.3
18.4
18.4
18.3
18.2
18.2
18.2
18.3
18.4
18.5
18.5
18.3
18.2
18.1
18.1
18.1
18.2
18.3
18.3
18.3
18.3
18.3
18.2
18.2
18.C
18.2
18.3
18.4
C02
(X>
2.0
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
1.5
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.9
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
1.9
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.8
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
3
16
16
18
56
201
322
249
141
83
63
37
20
15
9
5
3
1
1
4
5
6
7
13
13
7
7
10
15
17
16
7
3
-1
-3
-4
-2
3
3
2
1
2
-1
-2
2
11
10
4
3
-1
-1
0
3
0
3
17
17
. 26
63
47
28
15
14
15
10
10
4
1
AT 7% 02
(ppn)
43
77
73
79
244
319
1304
1064
645
382
295
177
97
77
48
27
15
4
4
18
24
28
36
67
65
36
33
47
69
80
77
33
18
-4
-19
-18
-11
13
16
11
6
9
-3
-11
10
52
47
19
14
-4
-4
2
17
0
12
82
84
133
326
241
145
76
68
75
47
49
21
5
ROLL IMG
AVERAGE
71
72
73
74
79
92
114
132
143
149
154
157
158
157
153
149
146
143
141
140
140
139
139
140
141
141
140
141
141
141
140
139
139
137
136
135
134
133
130
125
121
118
116
115
114
114
113
113
112
112
111
111
109
107
106
107
108
110
115
119
120
120
120
120
117
104
83
65
B-44
-------
MAIN DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
TIME
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
!944
1946
1947
1948
1950
1951
1952
1953
195*
1955
1956
1957
1959
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2006
2007
2008
2009
2011
2012
Miniir
max i"
Avera
DECIMAL
TIME
19.20
19.22
19.23
19.25
19.27
19.28
19.30
19.32
19.33
19.35
19.37
19.38
19.40
19.42
19.43
19.45
19.47
19.48
19.50
19.52
19.53
19.55
19.57
19.58
19.60
19.62
19.63
19.65
19.67
19.68
19.70
19.72
19.73
19.75
19.77
19.78
19.80
19.82
19.33
19.85
19.87
19.88
19.90
19.92
19.93
19.95
19.97
19.98
20.00
20.02
20.03
20.05
20.07
20.08
20.10
20.12
20.13
20.15
20.17
20.18
20.20
un*
un»
gt«
02
(X)
3.9
3.6
3.6
3.7
3.9
4.4
4.3
4.1
4.3
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.1
3.8
3.8
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.0
4.2
4.2
4.0
4.1
4.0
4.1
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.5
4.4
4.2
4.2
4.5
4.3
4.1
4.0
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.4
4.7
4.3
4.2
4.1
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.3
4.4
4.2
4.0
3.8
3.9
3.4
4.9
4.2
C02
(X) i
33.6
34.3
34.6
34.7
34.5
33.9
33.2
33.2
33.5
33.7
33.9
33.8
33.8
33.9
34.2
34.1
33.8
33.8
33.7
33.9
33.6
33.6 '
33.8
33.8
33.8
33.7
33.2
33.3
33.8
33.5
33.4
33.2
33.2
33.6
33.6
33.4
33.4
33.9
33.8
33.5
33.7
33.7
33.5
32.9
33.0
33.5
33.7
34.1
34.2
33.9
33.9
33.9
33.9
33.6
33.5
33.9
33.4
33.2
33.8
34.3
34.5
31.6
34.8
33.6
Cppm)
335
1249
5437
3090
1896
1211
601
440
451
426
541
597
549
533
614
776
591
434
416
439
455
407
446
420
425
442
399
354
372
437
409
368
354
398
426
345
331
516
671
447
406
495
560
440
346
364
367
379
538
458
424
448
423
381
350
334
404
339
358
465
637
298
8054
788
AT 7X 02
(ppm)
274
1002
4385
2507
1556
1018
505
365
377
349
447
493
454
434
500
641
492
359
343
365
379
336
370
346
351
370
334
295
309
364
346
310
294
331
363
289
274
425
561
372
337
409
473
377
290
302
304
310
444
378
349
370
351
317
290
279
340
283
294
378
521
251
6907
667
ROLLING
AVERAGE
536
518
565
590
607
618
619
619
618
618
620
622
624
625
627
629
627
626
625
619
588
543
527
517
514
514
515
515
515
516
515
513
512
512
512
512
512
512
515
514
513
515
518
520
519
518
515
511
510
509
510
511
512
512
512
511
512
511
511
513
517
BYPASS DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
ROLLING
AVERAGE
55
50
46
44
43
42
41
41
41
41
42
42
42
43
43
43
42
42
41
41
40
39
38
37
38
38
39
39
40
40
40
41
42
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
43
44
44
44
44
44
43
56
59
56
54
52
51
50
51
51
51
51
51
52
02
(X)
18.2
18.0
18.0
18.1
18.2
18.4
18.5
18.4
18.3
18.2
18.1
18.2
18.2
18.1
18.1
18.3
18.3
18.1
18.1
18.2
18.3
18.2
18.3
18.3
18.2
18.2
18.2
18.1
18.1
18.2
18.3
18.2
18.2
18.2
18.3
18.3
18.2
18.2
18.3
18.3
18.3
18.2
18.3
18.4
18.3
18.2
18.2
18.
18.
18.2
18.
18.
18.
18.2
18.
18.
18.3
18.3
18.2
18.0
18.0
17.5
18.9
18.3
C02
(X)
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.8
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.0
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.1
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.2
2.3
1.2
2.5
1.8
Cppw)
6
20
17
11
7
1
•0
-1
2
7
6
7
9
15
11
5
5
4
5
4
2
0
3
5
3
6
2
2
3
5
6
14
13
7
3
2
2
10
5
4
4
4
2
-1
4
3
5
66
116
64
32
17
8
5
6
20
15
6
4
10
20
-4
322
13
AT 7X 02
(ppn)
32
90
80
54
36
6
•1
-8
9
33
31
33
43
71
54
25
23
18
23
20
9
2
14
24
40
30
10
10
16
23
28
72
67
37
18
11
8
49
27
20
19
19
11
-6
21
13
22
316
565
318
156
81
41
23
30
96
74
30
19
46
91
-18.6
1304.1
59.3
B-45
-------
TIME DECIMAL
TIME
(X)
MAIN DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
C02 AT 7X 02 ROLLING 02 C02
(X) (ppn)
-------
RUN 1 - THC
COLO THC
BYPASS
TIME DECIMAL AT 7% 02 RUNNING
TIME (ppn) (ppn) AVERAGE
MAIN
AT 7X 02 RUNNING
(ppn) (ppn) AVERAGE
HEATED THC
MAIN
AT 7% 02 RUNNING
(ppm) DRY AVERAGE
BYPASS
AT 7% 02 RUNNING
DRY AVERAGE
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
15.72
15.73
15.75
15.77
15.78
15.88
15.90
15.92
15.93
15.95
15.97
15.98
16.00
16.02
16.03
16.05
16.07
16.08
16.10
16.12
16.13
16.15
16.17
16.18
16.20
16.22
16.23
16.25
16.27
16.28
16.30
16.32
16.33
16.35
16.37
16.38
16.40
16.42
16.60
16.62
16.63
16.65
16.67
16.68
16.70
16.72
16.73
16.75
16.77
16.78
16.80
16.82
16.83
16.85
16.87
16.88
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
1.4
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.2
0.6
0
•0.2
-0.2
•0.3
-0.3
-0.2
•0.2
-0.2
-0.2
•0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
•0.2
•0.2
-0.2
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.6
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.6
7.3
9.3
7.8
6.7
6.2
6.0
5.7
5.5
5.3
5.0
4.8
4.5
4.3
4.1
3.8
3.6
3.4
3.1
0.0
•1.0
-1.0
- .6
- .6
- .0
• .0
- .0
- .0
• .0
• .0
- .0
- .0
• .0
- .0
- .0
3.2
3.1
3.0
3.0
2.9
2.8
2.7
36.7
59.2
67.3
85.3
101.9
29
27.5
14.1
14.8
11.4
9
8.4
9.4
8.7
8.1
8.3
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.6
7.3
7.1
7.1
7.4
24.3
19.5
8.8
7.4
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.5
7.5
7.2
6.9
6.9
7
7
7.2
7.5
8.5
7.1
7.1
7.7
7.4
7.2
7.2
7.4
7.8
7.9
8.1
8.9
30.6
49.3
56.1
71.1
84.9
24.2
22.9
11.8
12.3
9.5
7.5
7.0
7.8
7.3
6.8
6.9
6.6
6.5
6.5
6.3
6.1
5.9
5.9
6.2
20.3
16.3
7.3
6.2
6.0
6.1
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.3
6.3
6.0
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
5.
6.0
6.3
7.1
5.9
5.9
6.4
6.2
6.0
6.0
6.2
6.5
6.6
6.8
7.4
11.8
11.4
10.7
9.8
8.8
7.4
7.2
38.5
30.9
57.6
127.5
60.3
22.3
29.5
13.5
18.1
12.6
11.4
10.8
12.7
10.5
10.8
10.6
10.4
10.3
10.1
9.9
9.7
9.5
9.7
10.2
36
13.7
10.1
9.7
9.7
9.8
10
9.9
9.9
10.2
9.9
9.6
9.3
9.1
9.1
9
9.2
9.5
9.9
8.9
9.1
9.6
9.2
9.1
9.1
9.4
9.7
9.6
10.3
10.2
40.1
34.2
59.9
132.6
62.7
23.2
30.7
14.0
18.8
13.1
11.9
11.2
13.2
10.9
11.2
11.0
10.8
10.7
10.5
10.3
10.1
9.9
10.1
10.6
37.5
14.3
10.5
10.1
10.1
10.2
10.4
10.3
10.3
10.6
10.3
10.0
9.7
9.7 *
9.6 *
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.4
9.6
9.9
10.3
9.3
9.5
10.0
9.6
9.5
9.5
9.8
10.1
10.0
10.7
10.6
16.9
16.4
15.2
14.4
12.3
11.5
11.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
1.6
2
1.4
1.2
1.1
0
-0.6
-0.7
-0.7
-0.8
-0.8
-0.7
-0.7
•0.7
-0.6
1.9
1.6
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
1.7
1.7
1.7
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.8
2.8
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.4
3.4
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.3
2.8
2.8
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.7
1.7
1.7
2.2
9.0
11.2
7.9
6.7
6.2
5.7 *
5.2 *
4.7 *
4.3 *
3.8 *
3.3 *
2.8 *
2.4 -
1.9 *
1.4 *
0.9 *
0.5 *
0.0
-3.4
-3.9
-3.9
-4.5
-4.5
-3.9
•3.9
•3.9
•3.4
10.7
9.0
5.1
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
2.4
2.5
2.5
2.6
2.6
2.7
7.7
B-47
-------
TIME DECIMAL
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
TIME
16.90
16.92
16.93
16.95
16.97
16.98
17.00
17.02
17.03
17.05
17.07
17.08
17.10
17.12
17.13
17.15
17.17
17.18
17.20
17.22
17.23
17.25
17.27
17.28
17.30
17.32
17.33
17.35
17.37
17.38
17.40
17.42
17.43
17.45
17.47
17.48
17.50
17.52
17.53
17.55
17.57
17.58
17.60
17.62
17.63
17.65
17.67
17.68
17.70
17.72
17.73
17.75
17.77
17.78
17.80
17.82
17.83
17.85
17.87
17.88
17.90
17.92
17.93
17.95
17.97
17.98
COLD THC
BYPASS
AT 7X 02 RUNNING
(ppm) (ppm) AVERAGE
•0.2
•0.2
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.2
-0.2
•0.2
-0.2
-0.2
•0.2
•0.2
-0.2
•0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
•0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.2
-0.2
•0.3
•0.3
-0.3
•0.3
•0.3
-0.3
•0.3
•0.2
-0.3
•0.3
-0.2
-0.2
•0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
23
-1.0
-1.0
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
•1.6
•1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-1.0
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
•1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.0
-1.0
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.0
-1.6
-1.6
-1.0
-1.0
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
•1.6
-1.6
-1.6
-1.6
119.3
2.7
2.6
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.0
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.1
0.0
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
-0.5
-0.6
•0.7
-0.8
-0.9
-1.0
-1.1
-1.1
-1.2
-1.3
-1.3
-1.3
-1.3
-1.3
-1.3
•1.3
•1.3
-1.4
-1.4
-1.4
-1.4
-1.4
-1.4
-1.4
-1.4
-1.4
-1.4
-1.4
-1.4
-1.4
•1.4
0.6
MAIN
AT 71 02 RUNNING
(PP"»
7.5
7.3
7. i
7.8
10.5
8.5
7.9
7.2
7.1
6.9
6.9
7
7.1
7
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.9
6.9
6.7
6.8
7
7
7
7.1
7.4
7.5
7.3
7.2
7.1
6 9
' *7
7.3
7.2
6.9
7.4
3
7.6
7.1
7
7.2
7.6
7.1
7
10.3
9.8
9.1
7.2
6.9
6.9
8.7
11.8
9.4
7.4
7.8
7.4
7.2
7.1
7.3
8.4
7.5
7.3
7
7.1
7.3
(ppm) AVERAGE
6.3
6.1
5.9
6.5
8.8
7.1
6.6
6.0
5.9
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.9
5.8
5.8
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.8
5.8
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.9
6.2
6.3
6.1
6.0
5.9
5.8
5.8
6.1
6.0
5.8
6.2
6.7
6.3
5.9
5.8
6.0
6.3
5.9
5.8
8.6
8.2
7.6
6.0
5.8
5.8
7.3
9.8
7.8
6.2
6.5
6.2
6.0
5.9
6.1
7.0
6.3
6.1
5.8
5.9
6.1
6.9
6.8
6.7
6.6
6,7
6.7
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.3
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.0
6.0
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.
6.1
6.1
6.1
- 6.1
6.1
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.2
6.2
HEATED
MAIN
AT 7X 02
(ppm)
9.3
9.1
8.9
9.9
11.5
9.9
9.1
8.7
8.7
3.6
3.5
3.7
3.8
8.7
3.6
8.5
3.6
8.7
8.8
3.8
8.6
3.8
8.9
8.8
8.9
8.9
9.2
9.2
9.1
8.8
8.7
8.6
8.7
8.9
8.8
8.6
9.1
9.6
9.2
8.7
8.8
9
9.3
8.9
8.8
12.1
11.5
10.1
9
8.8
8.8
10.7
13.8
10
9.1
9.6
9.1
8.9
8.9
9.1
10.1
8.9
8.9
8.5
8.8
8.9
DRY
9.7
9.5
9.3
10.3
12.0
10.3
9.5
9.1
9.1
8.9
8.8
9.1
9.2
9.1
8.9
8.8
8.9
9.1
9.2
9.2
8.9
9.2
9.3
9.2
9.3
9.3
9.6
9.6
9.5
9.2
9.1
8.9
9.1
9.3
9.2
8.9
9.5
10.0
9.6
9.1
9.2
9.4
9.7
9.3
9.2
12.6
12.0
10.5
9.4
9.2
9.2
11.1
14.4
10.4
9.5
10.0
9.5
9.3
9.3
9.5
10.5
9.3
9.3
8.8
9.2
9.3
THC
RUNNING
AVERAGE
10.9
10.8
10.7
10.6
10.6
10.6
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.4
10.4
10.4
10.3
10.3
10.3
10.3
10.3
10.2
9.8
9.7
9.7
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.6
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.7
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.5
9.5
BYPASS
AT 7X 02 RUNNING
(Ppm)
0.9
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.7
3.3
2.7
2.1
1.6
1.3
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.7
1.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
DRY AVERAGE
5J
4.5
4.5
4.5
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.4
3.4
2.3
2.8
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.3
2.8
3.9
18.5
15.2
11.8
9.0
7.3
6.2
5.6
5.1
4.5
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.4
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.2
2.8
2.8
4.5
3.9
10.1
4.5
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
4.5
3.9
3.9
4.5
4.5
5.1
4.5
4.5
4.5
3.9
3.9
3.4
3.4
2.8
2~.7
2.3
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.8
2.8
2.3
2.8
2.8
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
2.7
3.0
3.2
3.4
3.5
3.3
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.5
3.6
3.3
4.0
4.1
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.7
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
B-48
-------
COLO THC
BYPASS
TIME DECIMAL AT 7X 02 RU
TIME (ppm) Cppn) AV
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
1814
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1900
1901
1902
1903
1904
1905
1906
1907
18.00
18.02
18.03
18.05
18.07
18.08
18.10
18.12
18.13
18.15
18.17
18.18
18.20
18.22
18.23
18.25
18.27
18.28
18.30
18.32
18.33
18.35
18.37
18.38
18.40
18.42
18.43
18.45
18.47
18.48
18.50
18.52
18.53
18.55
18.57
18.58
18.60
18.62
18.63
18.65
18.67
18.68
18.70
18.72
18.73
18.75
18.77
18.78
18.80
18.82
18.83
18.85
18.87
18.88
18.90
18.92
18.93
18.95
18.97
18.98
19.00
19.02
19.03
19.05
19.07
19.08
19.10
19.12
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.8
3.9
8.6
5
2.7
1.8
1.4
1
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
1.9
2.8
2.4
2
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.2
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.1
3.6
4.1
20.2
44.6
25.9
14.0
9.3
7.3
5.2
4.7
4.1
4.1
4.1
3.6
3.6
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.6
3.6
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.1
9.9
14.5
12.4
10.4
8.3
7.3
7.3
6.2
MAIN
IING
:AGE
0.7
0.8
0.9
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.6
2.3
2.8
3.1
3.2
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.6
3.7
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.8
4.9
5.0
5.1
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.7
5.8
5.9
6.0
6.1
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.4
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.7
6.8
6.9
7.0
5.0
5.1
5.3
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.7
5.8
5.5
7
6.8
6.8
11.7
10.6
8.4
10.4
22.2
131.7
280. 5
37.4
15.4
18.2
11.7
9.3
8.7
8.2
8.1
8
7.7
7.8
7.5
7.5
7.6
7.6
8
9.3
7.7
7.3
8.7
17.6
27.7
11.6
9.1
8
7.4
7.1
7
7
7.3
7.7
7.4
7.3
7.1
7.2
7
7
7.5
7.5
7.6
7.5
7
7
7
7.2
7.6
7.9
9.9
7.8
7.7
7.2
7
7.1
7
6.7
6.7
7.2
7.1
AT 7X 02
CPP«>
5.8
5.7
5.7
9.8
8.8
7.0
8.7
18.5
109.8
233.8
31.2
12.8
15.2
9.8
7.8
7.3
6.8
6.8
617
6.4
6.5
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.7
7.8
6.4
6.1
7.3
14.7
23.1
9.7
7.6
6.7
6.2
5.9
5.8
5.8
6.1
6.4
6.2
6.1
5.9
6.0
5.8
5.8
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
5.8
5.8
5.8
6.0
6.3
6.6
8.3
6.5
6.4
6.0
5.8
5.9
5.8
5.6
5.6
6.0
5.9
RUNNING
AVERAGE
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.3
6.3
6.4
6.6
8.3
12.1
12.5
12.7
12.8
12.9
12.9
12.9
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.1
13.1
13.1
13.1
13.2
13.5
13.6
13.6
13.6
13.6
13.6
13.6
13.6
13.6
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.5
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.4
13.3
13.3
13.3
13.0
HEATED
THC
MAIN
AT
8.6
8.5
8.6
14.2
10.7
9.8
12.2
28.9
149.2
173.7
26.6
15.1
20.1
11.7
10.7
10.3
9.7
9.7
9.6
9.3
9.3
9.1
9.2
9.1
9.2
9.8
10.4
9.2
8.9
10.5
21.6
23.7
11.8
10.5
9.5
9.2
8.8
8.8
8.8
9.1
9.5
9.1
9.1
9
9
8.8
8.9
9.3
9.2
9.4
9.1
8.7
8.8
8.8
9.1
9.4
10
11.1
9.5
9.3
9.1
8.9
9.1
9
8.7
8.8
9.2
9
7X 02
DRY
3.9
8.8
8.9
14.8
11.1
10.2
12.7
30.1
155.2
180.7
27.7
15.7
20.9
12.2
11.1
10.7
10.1
10.1
10.0
9.7
9.7
9.5
9.6
9.5
9.6
10.2
10.8
9.6
9.3
10.9
22.5
24.7
12.3
10.9
9.9
9.6
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.5
9.9
9.5
9.5
9.4
9.4
9.2
9.3
9.7
9.6
9.8
9.5
9.1
9.2
9.2
9.5
9.8
10.4
11.5
9.9
9.7
9.5
9.3
9.5
9.4
9.1
9.2
9.6
9.4
RUNNING
AVERAGE
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.7
10.1
12.5
15.4
15.7
15.8
16.0
16.0
16.1
16.1
16.1
16.1
16.1
16.1
16.1
16.1
16.1
16.1
16.2
16.2
16.2
16.2
16.2
16.2
16.5
16.7
16.8
16.8
16.8
16.8
16.8
16.8
16.3
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.5
16.5
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.1
BYPASS
AT
-------
TIME DECIMAL
1908
1909
1910
1911
1912
1913
1914
1915
1916
1917
1918
1919
1920
1921
1922
1923
1924
1925
1926
1927
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
TIME
19.13
19.15
19.17
19.18
19.20
19.22
19.23
19.25
19.27
19.28
19.30
19.32
19.33
19.35
19.37
19.38
19.40
19.42
19.43
19.45
19.47
19.48
19.50
19.52
19.53
19.55
19.57
19.58
19.60
19.62
19.63
19.65
19.67
19.68
19.70
19.72
19.73
19.75
19.77
19.78
19.80
19.82
19.83
19.85
19.87
19.88
19.90
19.92
19.93
19.95
19.97
19.98
20.00
20.02
20.03
20.05
20.07
20.08
20.10
20.12
20.13
20.15
20.17
20.18
20.20
COLO THC
BYPASS
AT 7X 02 RUNNING
(ppn)
1.1
1
0.9
1
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
3.3
3
1.8
1.3
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
(ppn) AVERAGE
5.7
5.2
4.7
5.2
4.7
4.7
4.1
3.6
3.6
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
17.1
15.6
9.3
6.7
4.7
4.1
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
4.9
4.5
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.4
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.4
4.3
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.8
MAIN
AT TX, 02 RUNNING
CPpn>
7.1
7.1
6.9
10.5
71.6
34.8
14.6
18.5
10.1
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.3
7.8
7.3
7.4
7.6
8.3
9.4
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.3
7
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.1
7
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
6.8
6.9
7.2
7.2
7
7.3
9.1
7.5
7.1
7.4
7.3
7.3
6.9
6.8
7
7.1
7.2
7.3
7
7
7.1
7
7
7.1
7.1
6.8
6.9
7
7.4
7.3
7.2
HEATED THC
MAIN
AT 7X 02 RUNNING
(ppn) AVERAGE (ppn)
5.9
5.9
5.3
8.8
59.7
29.0
12.2
15.4
8.4
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.1
6.5
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.9
7.8
6.1
6.0
6.1
6.1
5.8
5.9
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.9
5.8
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.7
5.8
6.0
6.0
5.8
6.1
7.6
6.3
5.9
6.2
6.1
6.1
5.8
5.7
5.8
5.9
6.0
6.1
5.8
5.8
5.9
5.8
5.8
5.9
5.9
5.7
5.8
5.8
6.2
6.1
6.0
11.3
7.5
7.1
7.0
7.8
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.1
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.6
6.7
9
9.1
8.9
15
74.5
27.6
14.5
19.9
10.5
9.3
9.4
9.3
9.2
9.6
9.2
9.2
9.5
10.6
10.6
9.1
9.1
9.2
9.2
8.9
9.1
9.2
9.2
9.2
9.1
9
9.1
9.1
9.1
9.1
8.8
9
9.2
9.1
8.8
9.2
10.8
9.1
8.9
9.2
9.1
9
8.7
8.7
8.9
9.1
9.2
9.4
9.1
9.1
9.1
9
8.9
9.2
9
8.7
8.9
9
9.4
9.1
9.1
BYPASS
AT TH 02 RUNNING
DRY AVERAGE (ppn)
9.4
9.5
9.3
15.6
77.5
28.7
15.1
20.7
10.9
9.7
9.8
9.7
9.6
10.0
9.6
9.6
9.9
11.0
11.0
9.5
9.5
9.6
9.6
9.3
9.5
9.6
9.6
9.6
9.5
9.4
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.2
9.4
9.6
9.5
9.2
9.6
11.2
9.5
9.3
9.6
9.5
9.4
9.1
9.1
9.3
9.5
9.6
9.8
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.4
9.3
9.6
9.4
9.1
9.3
9.4
9.8
9.5
9.5
13.7
10.3
10.5
10.5
11.5
11.7
11.8
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
11.8
11.5
11.5
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.5
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.4
11.3
10.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.1
1
1
0.8 '
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
3.5
3.1
1.5
1
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
DRY AVERAGfc
6.7
6.2
6.2
6.7
6.2
5.6
5.6
4.5
3.9
3.4
3.4
2.8
2.8
2.2
2.2
2.8
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
1.7
1.7
2.2
2.2
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
2.8
3.4
3.4
3.9
3.9
4.5
3.9
3.4
3.4
3.4
2.8
2.8
2.2
2.2
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.1
1.1
19.6
17.4
3.4
5.6
3.9
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.9
3.9
3.9
4.7
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4,2
4.2
«,?
4 ?
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.3
4.6
4.6
4.4
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.6
B-50
-------
TIME DECIMAL
TIME
2054 26! 90
2055 20.92
2056 20.93
2057 20.95
2058 20.97
2059 20.98
2100 21.00
2101 21.02
2102 21.03
2103 21.05
2104 21.07
2105 21.08
2106 21.10
2107 21.12
2108 21.13
2109 21.15
2110 21.17
2111 21.18
2112 21.20
2113 21.22
2114 21.23
2115 21.25
2116 21.27
2117 21.28
2118 21.30
2119 21.32
2120 21.33
2121 21.35
2122 21.37
2123 21.38
2124 21.40
2125 21.42
2126 21.43
2127 21.45
2128 21.47
2129 21.48
2130 21.50
2131 21.52
2132 21.53
2133 21.55
2134 21.57
2135 21.58
2136 21.60
2137 21.62
2138 21.63
2139 21.65
2140 21.67
2141 21.68
2142 21.70
2143 21.72
2144 21.73
2145 21.75
2146 21.77
2147 21.78
2148 21.80
2149 21.82
2150 21.83
2151 21.85
2152 21.87
2153 21.88
2154 21.90
2155 21.92
2156 21.93
2157 21.95
2158 21.97
2159 21.98
2200 22.00
2201 22.02
2202 22.03
2203 22.05
Run Average"
N2 Bias Aver
Ambient Air
(PPt)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.2
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.0
0.8
COLO THC
BYPASS
AT 7X 02 KUNMING
(ppfll) AVERAGE
MAIN
AT 7* 02 RUNNING
(POP) (pptn) AVERAGE
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.7
2
2.7
1.8
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
.2
.2
1.
1.
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
11.5
0.1
1.3
HEATED THC
MAIN
AT 7X 02 RUNNING
(ppm) DRY AVERAGE
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.3
-0.2
1.2
5.2
2.6
2.1
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
12.9
0.5
1.7
BYPASS
AT 7X 02 RUNNING
(ppm) DRY AVERAGE
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
0
0
0
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.8
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1
0.7
0.2
0.7
B-51
-------
COLO THC
BYPASS HA IN
TIME DECIMAL AT 7X 02 RUNNING AT 7X 02
TIME (ppm) (ppn) AVERAGE (ppn) (ppm)
HEATED THC
MAIN
RUNNING AT 7X 02 RUNNING
AVERAGE (ppm) DRY AVERAGE
BYPASS
AT 7X 02 RUNNING
(ppn) DRY AVERAGE
For Time Period 1548-1624
Zero Drift- 0.04 0.11
(X of span)
Span Drift- 3.66 0.20
(X of span)
Error Est.» 0.06 0.13
For Tim Period 1637-2012
Zero Drift- 0.00 0.09
(X of span)
Span Drift- 3.39 1.13
(X of span)
Error Est.« 0.02 0.22
* Data calculated by extrapolation.
0.18
0.56
0.25
0.05
13.10
1.74
0.00
2.23
0.02
0.60
4.54
0.63
Comments:
LINEARITY CHECK 20,35 PPM PROPANE CYLINDER ALM-867 (10-28-1989 -- 11:49:51]
LINEARITY CHECK 49.09 PPM PROPANE CYLINDER ALM-854 [10-28-1989 -- 11:57:45]
ALL THC'S PASSED LINEARITY CHECK [10-28-1989 -- 11:58:42]
NOW ON STACK GAS [10-28-1989 -- 12:00:47]
SPAN THC'S [10-28-1989 •- 13:57:13]
ZERO THC'S [10-28-1989 -- 14:06:40]
BACK ON STACK GAS [10-28-1989 -- 14:12:31]
SPAN THC [10-28-1989 -- 16:25:57]
SPANNED THC'S FROM 16:23 TO 16:25 [10-28-1989 -- 16:26:41]
ZERO THC'S [10-28'1989 -- 16:27:05]
END RUN 1 [10-28-1989 -- 20:18:22]
NITROGEN BIAS CHECK [10-28-1989 -- 20:49:09]
STARTED AMBIENT AIR CHECK AT 2123. [10-28-1989 -- 21:29:37]
ALL TIMES MENTIONED IN THE COMMENTS ARE 5 MINUTES SLOW.
B-52
-------
RUN 2 - O2, CO2, CO
MAIN DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
BYPASS OUCT
TIME
1159
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1300
1301
1302
1303
DECIMAL
TIME
11.98
12.00
12.02
12.03
12.05
12.07
12.08
12.10
12.12
12.13
12.15
12.17
12.18
12.20
12.22
12.23
12.25
12.27
12.28
12.30
12.32
12.33
12.35
12.37
12.38
12.40
12.42
12.43
12.45
12.47
12.48
12.50
12.52
12.53
12.55
12.57
12.58
12.60
12.62
12.63
12.65
12.67
12.68
12.70
12.72
12.73
12.75
12.77
12.78
12.80
12.82
12.83
12.85
12.87
12.88
12.90
12.92
12.93
12.95
12.97
12.98
13.00
13.02
13.03
13.05
02
(X)
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.8
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.8
3.7
4.1
4.3
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.1
4.0
3.9
4.0
4.0
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.3
4.2
3.8
3.8
4.0
4.1
3.9
3.7
3.6
3.8
3.9
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.2
4.3
4.0
3.7
3.8
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.3
4.2
3.9
3.9
C02
(X)
31.6
31.9
32.0
32.2
32.1
31.9
31.6
32.2
32.5
32.4
32.8
32.2
32.4
32.5
32.1
31.9
31.8
32.2
32.1
31.9
31.9
31.7
31.5
31.8
31.7
32.2
32.3
32.0
32.2
32.3
32.1
32.0
31.6
31.8
32.2
32.7
32.4
32.3
32.6
32.9
33.0
32.6
32.2
32.4
32.2
31.9
31.8
32.0
32.0
32.2
31.7
31.7
32.3
32.3
32.5
32.3
32.1
32.0
31.9
32.1
32.1
31.8
31.7
31.5
32.3
CO
360
421
642
1869
1204
767
515
519
1899
3301
3383
1970
1094
2234
908
539
497
496
497
589
489
410
376
378
418
556
603
534
561
917
803
544
424
933
2261
1310
859
544
748
1695
1670
851
607
765
589
659
669
542
496
641
474
398
678
1972
1282
821
551
447
445
474
509
470
407
410.
624
AT 7% 02 ROLLING
(ppn) AVERAGE
296
344
519
1529
990
632
424
421
1544
2666
2737
1602
885
1846
761
449
411
411
410
490
408
343
315
313
344
455
497
439
458
749
664
456
354
760
1842
1076
711
444
604
1367
1356
698
496
628
484
545
554
449
408
535
398
329
548
1608
1055
679
458
374
368
391 739
420 741
394 742
340 739
335 719
511 711
02
-------
MAIM DUCT
BYPASS DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
TIME
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
131Z
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
DECIMAL
TIME
13.07
13.08
13.10
13.12
13.13
13.15
13.17
13.18
13.20
13.22
13.23
13.25
13.27
13.28
13.30
13.32
13.33
13.35
13.37
13.38
13.40
13.42
13.43
13.45
13.47
13.48
13.50
13.52
13.53
13.55
13.57
13.58
13.60
13.62
13.63
13.65
13.67
13.68
13.70
13.72
13.73
13.75
13.77
13.78
13.80
13.82
13.83
13.85
13.87
13.88
13.90
13.92
13.93
13.95
13.97
13.98
14.00
14.02
14.03
14.05
14.07
14.08
14.10
14.12
14.13
02
m
4.2
4.4
4.7
4.0
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.3
4.4
4.3
4.0
4.1
4.3
4.1
4.1
3.9
4.1
4.1
3.8
3.6
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.6
3.8
3.9
4.0
3.8
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.2
4.0
4.1
3.9
3.9
4.0
3.9
3.8
4.0
3.9
4.1
4.0
3.9
3.8
3.8
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
C02
(X)
32.4
32.2
32.3
31.8
32.3
32.5
32.2
32.0
31.9
32.0
32.2
32.1
31.7
31.4
31.9
32.2
32.2
31.6
32.1
32.2
32.1
32.1
32.2
32.4
32.6
32.2
32.2
32.0
32.2
32.2
32.4
32.5
32.5
32.5
32.5
32.5
32.5
32.6
32.4
32.1
32.0
32.0
31.8
31.8
32.3
32.3
32.1
32.4
32.5
32.2
32.3
32.0
31.9
32.2
32.6
32.2
32.0
31.9
31.7
31.9
31.9
31.8
31.8
32.2
32.0
CO
Cppn)
586
490
470
448
541
724
518
485
454
455
524
549
429
325
396
545
530
417
568
703
900
563
629
1065
2712
1433
949
738
656
1296
2532
2528
2154
2470
1745
1266
788
1031
1113
616
506
510
568
465
604
771
580
788
2162
1065
821
579
464
638
899
770
514
501
419
427
479
416
350
447
475
AT 7X 02
(ppm)
487
413
403
368
444
597
429
404
376
376
433
460
361
272
327
451
444
346
469
576
747
467
512
857
2217
1177
780
609
538
1051
2046
2042
1737
2011
1424
1041
640
338
913
508
421
421
469
381
495
636
476
640
1775
872
679
476
379
520
734
636
428
415
350
355
398
344
289
371
394
ROLLING
AVERAGE
708
708
708
688
651
616
596
588
564
557
557
558
557
555
552
553
554
555
557
561
566
566
567
573
598
606
612
616
612
599
615
638
659
683
684
678
677
683
688
688
686
684
684
684
683
687
689
691
694
691
691
691
691
694
699
703
704
705
705
702
701
700
698
698
697
02
OS)
17.7
17.8
17.7
17.6
17. A
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.6
17.7
17.6
17.4
17.4
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.4
17.5
17.4
17.2
17.2
17.3
17.4
17.5
17.5
17.4
17.4
17.4
17.3
17.3
17.3
17.4
17.6
17.5
17.5
17.4
17.4
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.4
17.5
17.4
17.2
17.3
17.3
17.4
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.5
17.6
17.6
17.6
17.7
17.7
17.6
17.7
17.7
17.5
17.6
C02
(X)
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.1
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.0
2.0
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.4
2.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
2.2
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.2
2.1
2.3
2.4
2.2
2.3
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.2
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.2
2.3
2.1
CARBON MONOXIDE
CO
(ppn)
17
19
12
16
16
H
13
10
14
21
13
5
5
7
7
6
16
18
18
11
8
9
21
18
12
7
8
25
33
38
33
25
37
31
22
19
30
22
14
7
7
6
3
9
12
11
77
194
173
91
49
23
13
14
11
9
5
7
5
6
7
5
6
8
AT 7X 02
(ppm)
62 *
72
81
52
64
62
57
53
39
55
82
55
22
19
26
26
22
64
74
72
43
32
32
75
67
46
29
34
96
128
145
126
93
141
121
91
76
121
87
55
29
26
23
14
35
47
44
283
731
656
353
194
90
53
57
43
36
22
29
21
25
31
21
24
34
ROLLING
AVERAGE
76
77
77
74
70
66
65
64
63
63
64
64
63
62
62
62
62
63
63
64
64
64
64
64
64
64
64
63
59
57
56
56
57
58
58
57
57
59
60
60
60
59
58
57
58
58
58
62
73
83
88
91
91
92
92
92
92
92
92
91
91
90
89
89
88
B-54
-------
MAIN DUCT
BYPASS DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
TIME DECIMAL
TIME
1409 U.15
1410 14.17
1411 14.18
1412 14.20
1413 14.22
1414 14.23
1415 14.25
1416 14.27
1417 14.28
1418 14.30
1419 14.32
1420 14.33
1421 14.35
1422 14.37
1423 14.38
1424 14.40
1425 14.42
1426 14.43
1427 14.45
1428 14.47
1429 14.48
1430 14.50
1431 14.52
1432 14.53
1433 14.55
1434 14.57
1435 14.58
1436 14.60
1437 14.62
1438 14.63
1439 14.65
1440 14.67
Minimum-
Max i nun"
Average-
Zero drift-
CX of span)
Span drift*
(X of span)
Error Est.»
02
(X)
3.9
4.0
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.0
3.9
4.0
3.9
3.8
3.7
3.8
4.0
3.9
3.9
4.0
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.7
3.8
3.9
3.8
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
3.6
4.7
4.0
0.92
1.41
0.17
C02
(X)
31.9
32.3
32.4
32.1
32.5
32.7
32.4
32.1
31.9
32.3
32.2
32.3
32.1
32.4
32.5
32.1
32.2
32.3
32.1
32.1
32.3
32.4
32.3
32.4
32.5
32.3
32.2
32.3
31.9
32.1
32.1
32.1
31.4
33.0
32.2
2.34
3.73
1.48
CO
(ppiO
419
573
641
662
785
1213
809
602
461
789
621
806
968
1180
924
627
728
665
515
534
644
786
2035
1088
904
1168
758
598
532
311
352
486
311
3383
829
4.88
3.83
50.91
AT 7X 02
-------
RUN 2 • THC
COLO THC
BYPASS
TIME
1159
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
DECIMAL
TIME
11.98
12.00
12.02
12.03
12.05
12.07
12.08
12.10
12.12
12.13
12.15
12.17
12.18
12.20
12.22
12.23
12.25
12.27
12.28
12.30
12.32
12.33
12.35
12.37
12.38
12.40
12.42
12.43
12.45
12.47
12.48
12.50
12.52
12.53
12.55
12.57
12.58
12.60
12.62
12.63
12.65
12.67
12.68
12.70
12.72
12.73
12.75
12.77
12.78
12.80
12.82
12.83
12.85
12.87
12.88
12.90
12.92
CFVT;
1.9
1.3
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.6
4.1
4.1
3.0
2.6
2.3
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.7
.7
.7
.6
.6
.5
.5
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
3.3
2.1
1.9
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
.6
.5
.5
.4
.4
.5
1.7
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5
AT 7X 02
(PP»>
7.6
7.2
6.8
6.8
7.2
7.6
10.4
16.4
16.4
12.0
10.4
9.2
8.4
8.0
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.2
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.4
6.4
6.0
6.0
6.4
6.4
6.8
6.4
6.0
6.0
13.2
8.4
7.6
6.0
6.0
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.0
6.0
5.6
5.6
6.0
6.8
6.0
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
6.0
6.0
6.0
MAIN
ROLLING
AVERAGE (ppn)
11.8
18.9
11.6
10.3
9.9
9.5
39.8
36.7
31.6
16.4
15.8
20.6
11.5
9.0
9.2
9.2
9.2
11.7
9.2
8.7
8.7
8.7
9.1
9.7
9.5
9.5
9.7
12.2
10.8
9.5
9.0
19.8
32.5
13.3
10.8
9.1
12.7
23.3
12.6
9.8
9.4
10.6
9.3
9.7
10.3
9.7
9.1
11.4
9.5
8.9
9.3
28.6
15.4
9.7
9.2
9.2
9.0
AT 7% 02 ROLLING
(ppn) AVERAGE
9.7
15.6
9.6
8.5
8.2
7.8
32.8
30.2
26.0
13.5 -
13.0
17.0
9.5
7.4
7.6
7.6
7.6
9.6
7.6
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.5
8.0
7.8
7.8
8.0
10.0
8.9
7.8
7.4
16.3
26.8
11.0
8.9
7.5
10.5
19.2
10.4
8.1
7.7
8.7
7.7
8.0
8.5
8.0
7.5
9.4
7.8
7.3
7.7
23.6
12.7
8.0
7.6
7.6
7.4
(PP«")
15.8
19.5
13.6
12.6
12.5
12.0
49.7
25.3
32.0
15.4
19.4
20.0
12.5
11.5
11.8
11.7
11.9
13.9
11.2
11.1
11.2
11.0
11.4
11.9
11.4
11.5
11.7
14.2
12.2
11.2
10.8
22.4
29.4
14.4
12.1
10.9
14.6
23.7
13.7
11.6
11.4
12.4
11.1
11.6
12.2
11.4
11.0
13.2
11.1
10.8
11.2
29.7
14.5
11.4
11.1
11.1
10.8
HEATED THC
MAIN
AT 7X 02 ROLLING
DRY AVERAGE
16.3
20.1
14.0
13.0
12.9
12.4
51.2
26.1
33.0
15.9
20.0
20.6
12.9
11.9
12.2
12.1
12.3
14.3
11.5
11.4
11.5
11,3
11.7
12.3
11.7
11.9
12.1
14.6
12.6
11.5
11.1
23.1
30.3
14.8
12.5
11.2
15.0
24.4
14.1
12.0
11.7
12.8
11.4
12.0
12.6
11.7
11.3
13.6
11.4
11.1
11.5
30.6
14.9
11.7
11.4
11.4
11.1
BYPASS
AT 7X 02 ROLLING
(ppen) DRY AVERAGE
0.0
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.2
-0.2
0.1
1.7
2.5
1.3
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.1
1.8
0.9
0.4
0.0
-0.
-0.
0.0
•0.
•0.
•0.
-0.
-0.
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.0
-0.4
-0.4
-0.9
-0.9
0.4
7.4
10.9
5.7
2.6
2.2
1.3
0.4
0.4
0.9
1.3
1.3
0.9
1.3
0.9
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.8
2.2
2.6
1.3
0.9
0.4
7.9
3.9
1.8
0.0
-0.4
-0.4
0.0
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
0.0
1.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.3
B-56
-------
COLO THC
BYPASS
TIME DECIMAL
TIME
1256 12.93
1257 12.95
1258 12.97
1259 12.98
1300 13.00
1301 13.02
1302 13.03
1303 13.05
1304 13.07
1305 13.08
1306 13.10
1307 13.12
1308 13.13
1309 13.15
1310 13.17
1311 13.18
1312 13.20
1313 13.22
1314 13.23
1315 13.25
1316 13.27
1317 13.28
1318 13.30
1319 13.32
1320 13.33
1321 13.35
1322 13.37
1323 13.38
1324 13.40
1325 13.42
1326 13.43
1327 13.45
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337 13.62
1338 13.63
1339 13.65
1340 13.67
1341 13.68
1342 13.70
1343 13.72
1344 13.73
1345 13.75
1346 13.77
1347 13.78
1348 13.80
1349 13.82
1350 13.83
1351 13.85
1352 13.87
AT
(ppn) <
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.9
3.2
2.7
2.3
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.9
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.8
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.7
1.4
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
4.6
7.4
4.6
7X 02
PP»)
5.6
5.6
5.6
7.6
12.8
10.8
9.2
8.4
8.4
8.0
8.0
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.2
6.8
7.6
6.8
6.4
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.4
6.4
7.2
6.4
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.8
6.7
6.6
6.5
6.4
6.3
6.2
6.1
6.0
5.9
5.8
5.7
5.6
6.8
6.8
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.8
6.8
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.8
18.4
29.6
18.4
ROLLING
AVERAGE
7.2
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.2
7.1
7.0
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.7
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.6
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.9
7.3
7.6
MAIN
Cppn)
9.1
9.4
9.7
9.2
9.1
10.5
9.8
9.2
8.9
9.1
10.1
10.3
9.1
9.1
9.1
9.2
9.2
9.9
8.9
9.0
8.9
9.2
9.3
9.1
9.1
9.2
13.9
10.6
9.1
12.0
15.4
13.0
12.3
15.2
11.1
10.3
9.4
10.8
10.7
10.2
10.0
9.8
9.6
19.6
18.9
11.4
AT 7X 02
(Ppn)
7.5
7.7
8.0
7.6
7.5
8.6
8.1
7.6
7.3
7.5
8.3
8.5
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.6
7.6
8.2
7.3
7.4
7.3
7.6
7.7
7.5
7.5
7.6
11.4
8.7
7.5
9.9
12.7
10.7
10.1
12.5
9.1
8.5
7.7
8.9
8.8
8.4
8.2
8.1
7.9
16.1
15.6
9.4
ROLLING
AVERAGE
10.7
10.6
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.5
10.0
9.7
9.4
9.3
9.2
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.0
9.1
9.1
9.1
9.1
9.1
9.2
9.2
9.1
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.5
8.4
8.5
8.5
8.6
8.6
8.7
8.6
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.5
8.6
8.6
HEATED
THC
MAIN
AT
(ppn)
11.0
11.1
11.2
10.7
10.7
12.1
11.3
10.8
10.6
10.7
11.9
11.7
10.9
10.9
10.9
11.0
11.0
11.5
10.6
10.7
10.6
10.9
11.0
10.8
10.8
10.7
15.1
11.9
10.6
13.5
16.6
13.7
13.6
15.5
12.4
11.9
11.1
12.6
12.2
12.0
11.8
11.6
11.5
21.5
18.1
12.9
7X 02
DRY
11.3
11.4
11.5
11.0
11.0
12.5
11.6
11.1
10.9
11.0
12.3
12.1
11.2
11.2
11.2
11.3
11.3
11.9
10.9
11.0
10.9
11.2
11.3
11.1
11.1
11.0
15.6
12.3
10.9
13.9
17.1
16.9
16.6
16.4
16.1
15.9
15.6
15.4
15.1
14.9
14.6
14.4
14.1
14.0
16.0
12.8
12.3
11.4
13.0
12.6
12.4
12.2
12.0
11.9
22.2
18.7
13.3
ROLLING
AVERAGE
15.0
14.9
14.8
14.7
14.7
14.7
14.7
14.0
13.8
13.4
13.3
13.2
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
12.9
12.9
12.9
12.9
12.9
12.9
12.9
12.9
12.9
13.0
13.0
13.1
13.2
13.2
13.1
12.9
12.9
12.9
13.0
13.0
12.8
12.8
12.9
12.9
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
13.0
12.9
13.0
13.0
BYPASS
AT
(ppn)
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.2
2.3
1.3
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.4
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
3.4
7.5
4.0
7X 02
DRY
1.3
0.9
0.4
0.9
10.1
5.7
3.5
2.2
1.8
0.9
1.3
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.4
1.3
1.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.9
0.4
2.2
1.3
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.1
3.3
3.5
3.7
3.9
4.2
4.4
3.9
3.5
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
3.1
3.1
3.1
14.9
32.8
17.5
ROLLING
AVERAGE
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.5
1.5
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.8
3.1
B-57
-------
TIME DECIMAL
TIME (pf
1353 13.88 2
1354 13.90 J
1355 13.92
1356 13.93
1357 13.95
1358 13.97
1359 13.98
1400 14.00
1401 14.02
1402 14.03
1403 14.05
1404 14.07
1405 14.08
1406 14.10 1
1407 14.12
1408 14.13
1409 14.15
1410 14.17
1411 14.18
1412 14.20
1413 14.22
1414 14.23
1415 14.25
1416 14.27
1417 14.28
1418 14.30
1419 14.32
1420 14.33
1421 14.35
1422- 14.37
1423 14.38
1424 14.40
1425 14.42
1426 14.43
1427 14.45
1428 14.47
1429 14.48
1430 14.50
1431 14.52
1432 14.53
1433 14.55
1434 14.57
1435 14.58
1436 14.60
1437 14.62
1438 14.63
1439 14.65
1440 14.67 ;
1441 14.68
1627 16.45
1628 16.47 (
1629 16.48 (
1630 16.50 (
1631 16.52 (
1632 16.53 (
1633 16.55 (
1634 16.57 (
COLO
BYPASS
AT 7X 02
ffl) (ppm)
!.0 12.0
>.1 8.4
.8 7.2
.7 6.8
.7 6.8
.7 6.8
.7 6.8
.6 6.4
.5 6.0
.5 6.0
.5 6.0
.4 5.6
.4 5.6
.4 5.6
.4 5.6
.5 6.0
.5 6.0
1.4 5.6
.4 5.6
.4 5.6
.4 5.6
.4 5.6
.4 5.6
.5 6.0
.5 6.0
.5 6.0
.5 6.0
.7 6.8
.6 6.4
.5 6.0
.6 6.4
.5 6.0
.5 6.0
.5 6.0
.5 6.0
.5 6.0
.7 6.8
.5 6.0
.4 5.6
.4 5.6
.4 5.6
.4 5.6
1.4 5.6
1.4 5.6
1.4 5.6
.4 5.6
.4 5.6
2.4 9.6
5.8
).8
).8
1.8
3.8
).a
5.8
THC HEATED THC
MA!M MAIN BYPASS
ROLLINC AT 7X 02 ROLLING AT 7X 02 ROLLING AT TX. 02 ROLLING
AVERAGE (ppm) (ppm) AVERAGE (ppm) DRY AVERAGE (ppm) DRY AVERAGE
7.7 9.5 7.8 8.6 11.2 11.5 13.0 2.2 9.6 3.2
7.7 9.6 7.9 8.6 11.5 11.9 13.0 .3 5.7 3.3
7.7 10.3 8.5 8.7 12.1 12.5 13.0 .1 4.8 3.4
7.7 12.0 9.9 8.7 13.7 14.1 13.1 .1 4.8 3. A
7.8 9.9 8.2 8.7 11.6 12.0 13. .0 4.4 3.5
7.8 9.9 8.2 8.7 11.7 12.1 13. .0 4.4 3.6
7.8 9.2 7.6 8.7 11.1 11.4 13. .0 4.4 3.6
7.7 9.7 8.0 8.7 11.5 11.9 13. .0 4.4 3.5
7.6 9.5 7.8 8.7 11.3 11.6 13. .0 4.4 3.5
7.5 9.4 7.7 8.7 11.0 11.3 13. 0.9 3.9 3.5
7.5 9.5 7.8 8.7 11.0 11.3 13. 0.9 3.9 3.5
7.4 9.6 7.9 8.7 11.2 11.5 13. 0.8 3.5 3.6
7.4 9.7 8.0 8.7 11.3 11.6 13. 0.7 3.1 3.6
7.4 9.2 7.6 8.7 10.8 11.1 13.1 0.6 2.6 3.6
7.3 9.4 7.7 8.7 11.1 11.4 13.1 0.5 2.2 3.7
7.3 11.4 9.4 8.7 12.9 13.3 13.1 0.5 2.2 3.7
7.3 9.8 8.1 8.8 11.3 11.6 13.1 0.4 1.8 3.7
7.2 12.2 10.0 8.8 13.7 14.1 13.2 0.4 1.8 3.7
7.2 10.8 8.9 8.3 12.3 12.7 13.2 0.3 1.3 3.7
7.2 11.3 9.3 8.9 12.9 13.3 13.2 0.4 1.8 3.7
7.2 11.0 9.1 8.9 12.6 13.0 13.2 0.4 1.8 3.7
7.2 9.3 7.7 8.9 11.1 11.4 13.2 0.4 1.8 3.8
7.1 9.3 7.7 8.9 11.2 11.5 13.3 0.4 1.8 3.3
7.1 14.0 11.5 9.0 15.8 16.3 13.3 0.5 2.2 3.3
7.1 10.9 9.0 9.0 12.0 12.4 13.4 0.6 2.6 3.8
7. 11.3 9.3 9.0 13.3 13.7 13.4 0.6 2.6 3.9
7. 14.1 11.6 9.1 15.5 16.0 13.5 0.6 2.6 3.9
7. 16.0 13.2 9.2 17.1 17.6 13.6 0.8 3.5 3.9
7. 14.4 11.9 9.3 15.2 15.7 13.7 0.8 3.5 4.0
7. 10.1 8.3 9.3 11.8 12.2 13.6 0.7 3.1 4.0
7. 10.0 8.2 9.3 11.8 12.2 13.6 0.8 3.5 4.0
7. 10.3 8.5 9.3 12.0 12.4 13.6 0.8 3.5 4.1
7. 10.9 9.0 9.3 12.5 12.9 13.6 0.8 3.5 4.1
7. 10.4 8.6 9.2 12.2 12.6 13.5 0.8 3.5 4.2
7. 10.4 8.6 9.2 11.9 12.3 13.5 0.8 3.5 4.2
7. 9.9 8.2 9.1 11.5 11.9 13.4 0.7 3.1 4.2
7. 26.6 21.9 9.4 27.8 28.7 13.6 1.0 4.4 4.2
7. 18.3 15.1 9.5 17.3 17.8 13.6 0.6 2.6 4.2
7. 13.6 11.2 9.5 14.4 14.8 13.6 0.6 2.6 4.2
7. 11.3 9.3 9.5 12.8 13.2 13.6 0.5 2.2 4.2
7. 16.5 13.6 9.6 17.2 17.7 13.6 0.4 1.8 4.2
7. 10.6 8.7 9.6 12.1 12.5 13.6 0.4 1.8 4.2
7. 9.7 8.0 9.6 11.3 11.6 13.5 0.4 1.8 4.1
7. 10.2 8.4 9.5 11.9 12.3 13.5 0.3 1.3 4.1
7. 10.9 9.0 9.5 12.6 13.0 13.4 0.4 1.8 4.0
7. 9.5 7.8 9.5 11.5 11.9 13.4 0.4 1.8 4.0
7.0 9.7 8.0 9.4 11.6 12.0 13.4 0.5 2.2 4.0
7.1 9.5 7.8 9.4 11.4 11.7 13.3 1.4 6.1 4.0
0.7 ..' 0.5
0.7 .8 0.5
0.7 .7 0.5
0.7 .7 0.6
0.7 .8 0.5
0.8 .8 0.6
0.8 .8 0.6
B-58
-------
COLO THC
BYPASS
TIME DECIMAL AT 7X 02 ROLLING
TIME (ppm) (ppm) AVERAGE
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
16.53
16.60
16.62
16.63
16.65
16.67
16.68
16.70
16.72
16.73
16.75
16.77
16.78
16.80
16.82
16.83
16.85
16.87
16.88
16.90
16.92
16.93
16.95
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.0
0.6
0.9
0.0
Run Average"
Ambient Air
1.8
0.7
7.1
MAIN
AT 7X 02
(ppm) (ppm)
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.0
11.8 9.7
0.7
0.60
5.58
1.25
0.18
2.13
0.43
HEATED THC
MAIN
ROLLING AT 7X 02 ROLLING
AVERAGE (ppm) DRY AVERAGE
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.7
.7
.7
.7
.7
.7
.7
.6
1.6
0.9
-4.0
13.3 13.9
1.5
0.42
2.94
0.81
0.08
2.91
0.47
BYPASS
AT 7X 02 ROLLING
(ppm) DRY AVERAGE
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0.3
-1.3
0.6 2.5
0.2
1.48
2.63
1.48
0.10
5.12
0.13
FOP Time Peroid 1159-1326
Zero Drift- 0.15
(X of span)
Span Drift* 5.08
(X of span)
Error Est.« 0.24
For Time Peroid 1338-1440
Zero Drift' 0.04
(X of span)
Span Drift* 3.24
(X of span)
Error Est.« 0.10
* Data calculated by extrapolation.
Comments:
LINEARITY CHECK PROPANE 49.09 PPM [10-29-1989 -- 09:49:591
LINEARITY CHECK 49.09 PPM PROPANE [10-29-1989 -- 10:08:36]
LINEARITY CHECK PROPANE 20.35 PPM [10-29-1989 -- 10:11:02]
ALL BUT HOT THC MAIN PASSED LINEARITY CHECK-WILL REZERO AND RESPAN HOT MAIN [10-29-1989 -- 10:13:39]
LINEARITY CHECK 20.35 PPM PROPANE [10-29-1989 -- 12:06:51]
LINEARITY CHECK PROPANE 49.09 PPM [10-29-1989 -- 12:16:11]
ALL THC'S MOW PASS LINEARITY CHECK [10-29-1989 -- 12:20:08]
BYPASS THC'S NOW ON STACK GAS [10-29-1989 -- 12:21:27]
BEGIN RUN Y1TP-1989'--L12-5V59 ™IS """ *"* STIU* * DAYL1GHT TIHE- "0-29-1989 -- 12:50:43]
THC ZERO [10-29-1989 -- 14:21:48]' •
SPAN THC [10-29-1989 -- 14:27:05]
B-59
-------
RUN 3 - 02, C02, CO
MAIM 3UCT
CAS3CN MONOXIDE
TIME
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1143
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1223
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
DECIMAL
TIME
11.65
11.67
11.68
11.70
11.72
11.73
11.75
11.. V
11. 7.3
11.80
11.82
11.83
11.35
11.87
11.88
11.90
11.92
11.93
11.95
11.97
11.98
12.00
12.02
12.03
12.05
12.07
12.08
12.10
12.12
12.13
12.15
12.17
12.18
12.20
12.22
12.23
12.25
12.27
12.28
12.30
12.32
12.33
12.35
12.37
12.38
12.40
12.42
12.43
12.45
12.47
12.48
12.50
12.52
12.53
12.55
12.57
12.58
12.60
12.62
12.63
12.65
12.67
12.63
12.70
12.72
12.73
12.75
12.77
12.78
12.80
12.82
12.83
12.85
12.87
02
CX)
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.6
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.5
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
C02
(X)
31.2
31.1
31.1
31.2
31.3
31.3
31.2
31.3
31.3
31.2
31.1
31.2
31.2
31.2
30.9
30.8
30.8
30.3
30.7
31.2
31.2
31.1
31.2
31.2
30.9
30.9
30.9
31.0
31.0
31.1
31.1
31.1
31.0
30.3
30.7
30.9
30.8
30.7
30.6
30.3
30.6
30.3
30.4
30.6
30.7
31.0
31.0
30.9
31.0
31.2
31.1
31.1
31.0
30.8
30.6
30.3
30.6
30.7
30.3
30.3
30.7
30.7
31.0
31.3
31.2
30.9
30.6
30.6
30.7
30.7
30.7
30.7
30.7
30.3
(ppm)
332
299
310
318
306
330
344
311
298
296
351
410
317
296
275
266
243
251
256
246
256
243
257
272
262
258
256
273
271
282
289
310
319
277
269
253
266
247
248
247
233
225
229
234
238
236
236
226
234
251
257
335
333
253
239
234
241
228
225
218
229
261
273
291
283
251
234
209
225
238
235
224
220
224
AT 7X 02
(ppm)
275
249
257
261
252
272
284
256
245
244
291
341
264
247
230
223
208
211
214
205
213
207
214
227
220
215
213
228
225
234
240
258
267
232
225
212
224
207
208
208
198
191
194
197
199
197
198
190
195
209
213
279
278
216
199
196
202
191
188
183
192
217
225
241
235
210
198
175
189
201
198
189
185
189
BYPASS DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
ROLLING
AVERAGE
.ING
iAGE
227
226
225
225
224
224
223
221
220
219
218
217
214
213
212
02
(X)
16.3
16.2
16.4
16.5
16.4
16.4
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.2
16.2
16.3
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.4
16.4
16.4
16.3
16.4
16.4
16.5
16.5
16.4
16.4
16.4
16.4
16.6
16.5
16.6
16.7
16.6
16.5
16.4
16.3
16.4
16.5
16.4
16.5
16.5
16.4
16.5
16.4
16.3
16.3
16.5
16.4
16.5
16.5
16.4
16.3
16.3
16.4
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.6
16.4
16.4
16.4
16.5
16.4
16.4
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.4
16.4
16.5
16.5
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.6
C02
(X)
4.2
4.1
3.9
3.3
3.9
3.9
4.0
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.1
4.0
3.9
3.3
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.3
3.8
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.2
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.1
3.9
4.0
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.9
4.1
(ppm)
9
14
16
12
3
5
4
4
4
9
17
9
6
4
2
5
11
9
4
7
15
13
8
6
3
4
21
26
13
8
3
5
10
20
16
13
8
9
8
5
3
5
7
4
5
5
11
29
20
7
6
6
4
1
1
0
1
1
3
4
14
21
18
13
9
1
2
1
2
5
3
2
4
8
AT 7X 02
Cppm)
25
41
48
37
26
14
12
12
13
25
50
27
19
12
7
15
34
28
11
20
45
33
25
18
8
12
65
32
39
27
9
16
29
62
47
40
24
27
25
14
9
15
22
13
15
14
32
83
60
22
17
17
12
4
4
1
3
2
8
13
42
64
56
42
28
4
6
2
5
16
8
6
12
24
25
25
26
26
26
26
26
26
25
25
25
25
24
24
24
B-60
-------
TIME
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1214
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
DECIMAL
TIME
12.38
12.90
12.92
12.93
12.95
12.97
12.98
13.00
13.02
13.03
13.05
13.07
13.08
13.10
13.12
13.13
13.15
13.17
13.18
13.20
13.22
13.23
13.25
13.27
13.28
13.30
13.32
13.33
13.35
13.37
13.38
13.40
13.42
13.43
13.45
13.47
13.48
13.50
13.52
13.53
13.55
13.57
13.58
13.60
13.62
13.63
13.65
13.67
13.68
13.70
13.72
13.73
13.75
13.77
13.78
13.80
13.82
13.83
13.85
13.87
13.88
13.90
13.92
13.93
13.95
13.97
13.98
14.00
14.02
14.03
14.05
14.07
14.08
14.10
02
(X)
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.6
4.7
4.7
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.6
4.2
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.5
4.5
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.9
4.8
4.9
4.7
4.6
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.7
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.7
4.7
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.8
4.3
4.7
4.7
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.6
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.6
4.5
4.6
4.5
C02
CX5
30.3
30.6
30.5
30.5
30.5
30.2
30.1
30.3
30.2
30.0
30.0
30.4
31.0
31.3
31.5
31.5
31.3
31.0
30.8
30.7
30.6
30.6
30.5
30.5
30.4
30.3
30.0
29.9
30.0
30.2
30.2
30.3
30.4
30.4
30.5
30.5
30.5
30.2
30.3
30.3
30.2
30.5
30.6
30.5
30.4
30.5
30.6
30.6
30.6
30.5
30.5
30.5
30.3
30.4
30.3
30.3
30.3
30.1
30.2
30.3
30.5
30.5
30.5
30.8
30.5
30.5
30.4
30.7
30.6
30.7
30.5
30.3
30.6
30.6
(ppm)
226
216
216
211
215
218
219
204
197
195
199
203
219
236
239
242
232
227
225
217
213
221
221
218
217
208
207
203
202
206
203
207
223
220
210
209
205
207
203
215
214
207
215
215
206
207
220
222
216
215
212
215
207
205
202
206
206
196
193
198
204
205
206
210
219
218
220
221
216
217
222
211
224
224
MAIM DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
AT 7X 02 ROL
cppno AVE;
191
183
182
178
183
187
189
176
170
168
170
170
181
194
197
201
194
190
189
183
180
187
187
185
186
180
180
176
174
178
174
177
191
188
180
179
176
177
174
184
182
176
184
183
176
176
186
188
184
184
181
184
178
177
174
179
178
169
166
170
174
175
175
179
187
186
186
187
184
184
189
180
191
190
LING
RAGE
211
211
210
210
209
209
209
208
207
206
206
205
204
204
203
203
202
201
199
199
198
197
197
196
196
196
195
195
195
194
194
194
194
194
193
193
192
190
189
188
188
188
187
187
187
187
187
186
186
185
184
183
183
183
183
182
182
182
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
181
182
182
182
182
02
(X)
16.5
16.5
16.4
16.4
16.5
16.5
16.6
16.7
16.6
16.6
16.5
16.4
16.3
16.3
16.4
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.4
16.4
16.4
16.5
16.6
16.6
16.6
16.5
16.4
16.4
16.4
16.4
16.5
16.3
16.2
16.2
16.2
16.3
16.3
16.4
16.3
16.2
16.1
16.2
16.1
16.1
16.2
16.2
16.3
16.4
16.3
16.2
16.2
16.1
16.2
16.3
16.3
16.4
16.3
16.2
16.2
16.2
16.1
16.2
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.2
16.1
16.2
16.2
16.1
16.3
16.4
C02
(X)
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.0
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.5
4.6
4.5
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.1
4.3
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.5
4.4
4.2
4.1
4 -.2
4.4
4.5
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.2
4.2
Cppn)
9
2
6
11
19
43
22
8
3
3
2
3
1
9
14
9
7
6
2
0
4
8
7
7
5
1
2
2
2
1
2
14
9
4
3
3
0
1
4
5
6
7
6
4
10
16
13
15
19
11
7
14
13
7
16
21
8
6
5
8
9
4
3
4
4
7
7
4
4
4
5
16
13
8
BYPASS DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
AT 7X 02 ROLLING
Cpcm) AVERAGE
26
6
18
33
58
135
70
27
9
9
6
10
2
27
41
29
23
20
6
0
13
24
21
20
16
2
7
7
7
4
6
43
29
11
7
8
1
4
11
14
18
22
16
10
29
46
39
44
56
32
22
41
38
19
46
61
23
19
16
24
26
12
8
12
11
20
21
12
10
11
15
46
40
23
25
24
24
24
25
27
27
27
27
27
27
27
26
25
25
25
25
25
25
24
23
23
23
23
23
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
22
21
20
20
19
19
19
19
20
20
20
20
21
21
21
21
21
21
20
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
23
21
20
20
20
20
20
20
21
21
B-61
-------
MAIM DUCT
BYPASS DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
TIME:ECIMAL
TIME
1407 14.12
1408 14.13
1409 14.15
1410 14.17
1411 14.18
1412 14.20
1413 14.22
1414 14.23
1415 14.25
1416 14.27
1417 14.28
1418 14.30
1419 14.32
1420 14.33
1421 14.35
1422 14.37
1423 14.38
1424 14.40
1425 14.42
1426 14.43
1427 U.45
1428 14.47
1429 14.48
1430 14.50
Minimum*
Maximum*
Average*
Zero drift*
(X of span)
Span drift*
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.2
16.2
16.2
16.3
16.2
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.5
16.6
16.4
16.3
16.3
16.3
16.4
16.5
16.1
16.7
16.4
0.50
2.42
0.46
C02
4.3
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.1
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.2
3.9
4.0
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.0
4.1
3.8
4.6
4.2
0.49
1.45
0.12
CARBON MONOXIDE
(ppm)
3
5
5
5
3
1
16
36
18
13
15
6
5
4
5
6
3
2
3
2
1
3
2
6
0
43
8
0.20
3.17
1.82
AT 7X 02
7
14
15
16
3
4
48
106
52
38
43
17
15
13
14
19
9
7
9
7
4
9
6
19
0
135
23
ROLLING
AVERAGE
20
20
20
20
20
20
21
22
23
23
23
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
23
23
23
23
23
24
Comments:
LINEARITY CHECK CO 392.3 PPM [10-30-1989 -- 09:34:01]
LINEARITY CHECK PROPANE 148.2 PPM [10-30-1989 •• 09:47:24]
LAST ENTRY MADE IN ERROR-LINEARITY CHECK IS 148.2 PPM CO [10-30-1989 -- 09-57-58]
LINEARITY CHECK 02 6.044X [10-30-1989 — 10:04:01]
LINEARITY CHECK 02 6.044X [10-30-1989 - 10:46:53]
LINEARITY CHECK C02 5.957X [10-30-1989 -- 10:57:36]
ALL ANALYZERS PASSED LINEARITY CHECK [10-30-1989 -- 11:06:49]
BYPASS 20 INNCHES -LESS THAN 5 OH PYREX [10-30-1989 -- 11:11:26]
MAIN 22 INCHES 15 AND 25 ON PYREX [10-30-1989 •- 11:11:52]
ALL LEAK CHECKS OK!!!!!!!!!!! [10-30-1989 •• 11:12:09]
NOW CN STACK GAS [10-30-1989 -- 11:12:25]
BEGIN RUN 3 [10-30-1989 -- 11:18:15]
LAST ENTRY WAS IN ERROR-RUN 3 HAS NOT BEGUN [10-30-1989 -- 11:32:27]
[10-30-1989 -- 11:41:36]
RUN 3 BEGAN AT 11:40 [10-30-1989 -- 11:47:31]
END RUN 3 [10-30-1989 •• 14:33:49]
BYPASS 20 INCHES LESS THAN 5 OH PYREX [10-30-1989 -- 14:38:00]
[10-30-1989 -- 14:46:36]
MAIN 22 INCHES AND 20 ON PYREX BALLS-LINES PASS LEAK CHECK [10-30-1989 -- 14:47:46]
B-62
-------
RUN 3 - THC
COLO THC
BYPASS
TIME
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
DECIMAL
TIME
11.65
11.67
11.68
11.70
11.72
11.73
11.75
11.77
11.78
11.80
11.82
11.83
11.85
11.87
11.88
11.90
11.92
11.93
11.95
11.97
11.98
12.00
12.02
12.03
12.05
12.07
12.08
12.10
12.12
12.13
12.15
12.17
12.18
12.20
12.22
12.23
12.25
12.27
12.28
12.30
12.32
12.33
12.35
12.37
12.38
12.40
12.42
12.43
12.45
12.47
12.48
12.50
12.52
12.53
12.55
12.57
12.58
12.60
12.62
12.63
12.65
12.67
12.68
12.70
12.72
(ppn)
1.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
75 02
(ppn)
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.7
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.7
MAIN
(ppn)
7.6
7.6
7.1
7.7
8.5
7.4
7.1
7.2
7.2
8.4
7.1
7
6.9
7
7
6.7
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.9
7.1
7.2
7.1
7.1
7.1
7
6.9
7.2
7.3
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6.9
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.8
7
9.1
9.8
7.2
7
7
7
7
6.9
7.1
7.2
7.4
7.3
7.3
7.2
7.2
7.2
n 02
(ppn)
6.4
6.4
6.0
6.5
7.2
6.2
6.0
6.1
6.1
7.1
6.0
5.9
5.8
5.9
5.9
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.8
6.0
6.1
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.9
5.8
6.1
6.2
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.8
5.8
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.7
5.9
7.7
8.3
6.1
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.8
6.0
6.1
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.1
6.1
6.1
HEATED THC
MAIN BYPASS
(ppn)
9.2
8.5
8.4
9.4
9.1
8.5
8.2
8.2
8.7
8.6
7.9
8
7.9
3
7.9
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.9
8.1
8.1
8.1
a
7.8
7.8
7.7
8
7.9
7.8
7.7
7.8
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.3
11.2
8.3
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.7
7.8
7.8
7X 02
DRY (ppra)
9.4 1.6
8.7 1.6
8.6 1.6
9.6 1.5
9.3 1.5
8.7 1.5
8.4 1.5
8.4 1.5
8.9 1.4
8.8 1.4
3.1 1.4
8.2 1.3
8.1 1.3
8.2 1.4
8.1 1.4
7.9 1.4
8.0 1.5
8.0 1.4
8.0 1.4
8.0 1.4
8.0 1.4
8.1 1.4
8.3 1.4
8.3 1.4
8.3 1.3
8.2 1.3
8.0 1.3
8.0 1.3
7.9 1.2
8.2 1.2
8.1 1.2
8.0 1.2
7.9 1.2
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
8.0
8.0
8.0
7.9
7.9
8.0
11.4
3.5
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.9
3.0
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.0
7.9
8.0
8.0
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3
.3
.4
.4
.3
.2
.2
.2
.1
.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
Ti. 32 COMMENTS
DRY
5.3 SAMPLING 3EGUN
5.3
5.3
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.9
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.3
4.3
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.9
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3 .
4.6
4.6
4.3
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.6
3.6
4.0
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
B-63
-------
COLO THC
BYPASS
HEATED THC
MAIM BYPASS
Ti. 02 7% C2
(ppm) DRY (ppmj DRY
COMMENTS
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1253
1259
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
12.73
12.75
12.77
12.78
12. 30
12.82
12.33
12.35
12.87
12.38
12.90
12.92
12.93
12.95
12.97
12.98
13.00
13.02
13.03
13.05
13.07
13.32
13.33
13.35 <
13.37 1
13.38
13.40
13.42
13.43
13.45
13.47
13.48
13.50
13.52
13.53
13.55
13.57
13.58
13.60
13.62
13.63
13.65
13.67
13.68
13.70
13.72
13.73
13. 71
13.77
13.78
13.80
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.2
.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
1
.1
.1
.1
.1
,
m
^
m
.1
.1
.1
.2
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.7
3.7
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
7.1
7.1
7.2
7.1
7
7
7
7
7.1
7
7
7
7.4
7
6.6
6.6
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.6
7.3
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.1
6.3
6.2
6.3
6.3
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.1
6.1
6.3
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.0
6.0
6.1
6.0
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
6.0
5.9
5.9
5.9
6.2
5.9
5.6
5.6
5.5
5.5
5.5
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.7
5.7
5.7
5.8
5.8
5.8
5.9
5.9
5.9
6.0
6.0
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.2
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.1
5.3
5.E
5.3
5.3
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.
5.
5.3
5.
5.
5.
7.3
7.7
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.6
7.6
8
7.5
7.4
7.6
7.4
7.5
7.4
7.5
8.5
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.6
8.3
8.2
8
8
8.1
8.1
8.2
8.2
8
8
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.1
8.2
8.1
8.2
8.3
3.0
7.9
3.0
7.9
7.9
7.3
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.3
7.3
8.2
7.6
7.5
7.3
7.5
7.6
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.9
7.9
8.0
8.1
8.1
8.2
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.4
8.5
8.5
8.6
8.7
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.8
8.5
8.4
8.2
8.2
8.3
8.3
8.4
8.4
8.2
8.2
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.3
8.4
8.3
8.4
8.5
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
1.6
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
4.0
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.6
3.7 ZERO AND
3.3 SPAN CHECK
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
5.0
5.1
5.2
5.3
3.0
2.6
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.0 •
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.6
2.0
2.3
2.0
1.6
1.6
2.0
1.6
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.3
2.3
B-64
-------
COLO THC
BYPASS MAIN
TIME DECIMAL
TIME (ppm)
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1353
1359
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1403
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1413
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1553
1559
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
13
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
.32 1.
.33 1.
.35
.37
.38
.90
.92
.93
.95
.97 1.
.98
.00
.02
.03
.05
.07
.08 1.
.10 1.
.12 1.
.13 1.
.15 1.
.17 1.
.18 1.
.20 1.
.22 1.
.23 1.
.25 1.
.27 1.
.28 1.
.30 1.
.32 1.
.33 1.
.35 1.
14.37 1.
14
14
14
14
.38 1.
.40 1.
.42 1.
.43 1.
14.45 1.
14.47 1.
14
14
14
14
15
15
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
.48 1.
.50 1.
.52 1.
.53
.97
75 02
Cppn)
3.3
3.3
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3 XI
3.0
3.0
3.3
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
I 3.3
1 3.3
1 3.3
1 3.3
1 3.3
1 3.3
1 3.3
1 3.3
1 3.3
1 3.3
1 3.3
1 3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.3
.98 0.9
.00 0.9
.02 0.9
.03 0.9
.05 0.9
.07 0.9
.08 0.9
.10 0.9
.12 0.9
.13 0.9
.15 0.9
.17 0.9
.18 0.9
16.20 0.9
16
.22 0.9
16.23 0.9
16.25 0.9
16.27 0.9
16.28 0.9
16.30 0.9
(ppm)
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.1
6.1
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.2
6.1
6.1
8.7
6.6
6.2
6.2
6.3
6.3
6.2
6.1
7.1
7.5
6.4
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.2
6.1
6.6
6.9
6.4
6.3
6.4
6.4
6.3
6.3
6.3
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
7X 02
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.1
5.1
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.2
5.1
5.1
7.3
5.6
5.2
5.2
5.3
5.3
5.2
5.1
6.0
6.3
5.4
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.2
5.1
5.6
5.8
5.4
5.3
5.4
5.4
5.3
5.3
5.3
HEATED THC
MAIM BYPASS
7X 02
(ppn)
3.3
3.6
3.3
9
8.9
8.7
3.6
3
7.3
6.9
6.3
6.6
6.5
6.3
6.5
6.3
7.1
9.3
7.6
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.3
7.3
9.2
8.3
7.9
8.2
8.1
8.1
Q.T
8
7.8
8.3
8.6
8
8
8
8
8
8.3
8.9
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
02
If
3.5
3.3
9.0
9.2
9.1
3.9
3.8
3.2
7.4
7.0
6.9
6.7
6.6
6.4
6.6
6.9
7.2
9.5
7.8
7.6
7.3
7.9
7.9
8.0
3.0
9.4
9.0
8.1
8.4
3.3
8.3
8.3
3.2
8.0
3.5
8.3
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.2
8.5
9.1
(ppra)
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.3
0.7
0.3
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.3
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
72 02 COMMENTS
DRY
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.0
2.0
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.6
2.3
2.6
2.3
2.3
2.3
2.6
2.3
2.3
2:3
2.3
2.6
2.6
2.3
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
3.0
3.0
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6
2.6 SAMPLING ENDED
AMBIENT AIR CHECK
B-65
-------
COLO THC
TIME DECIMAL
TIME (p
1619 16.32
1620 16.33
1621 16.35
1622 16.37
1623 16.38
1624 16.40
1625 16.42
1626 16.43
1627 16.45
1628 16.47
1629 16.48
1630 16.50
1631 16.52
1632 16.53
1633 16.55
1634 16.57
1635 16.58
1636 16.60
1637 16.62
1638 16.63
1639 16.65
1640 16.67
Run Average'
Ambient Air
For Time Peroid
Zero Drift"
(X of span)
Span Drift*
(X of span)
Error Est.«
For Time Peroid
Zero Drift*
(X of span)
Span Drift*
(X of span)
Error Est.=
BYPASS
7X 02
pro) (ppm)
0.9
U.9
:.?
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.7
1.1 3.3
0.9
1139-1303
0.08
0.89
0.09
1320-1431
0.02
1.04
0.03
MAIN
7X 02
(ppm) (ppm)
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
6.3 5.
1.0
0.41
3.63
0.65
0.00
2.38
0.16
HEATED THC
MAIN 3YPASS
7X 02 7* 02
(ppm) DRY (ppm) DRY
COMMENTS
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
1
2
2
1
1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
8.0
1.2
0.21
9.23
0.94
0.07
2.88
0.30
8.1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.49
0.46
0.49
0.11
5.27
0.16
Cold THC corrected to 7X02 » Raw value x ((14/<21-02 cone.))
Hot THC corr. to 7302, dry * Raw value x <(14/(21-02 conc.))/(1-moist. cone.)
Comments:
THC'S PASSED LINEARITY CHECK 110-30-1989 -- 11:51:05]
MOW CM STACK GAS C10-30-1989 -- 12:07:55]
BEGIN RUM 3 C10-30-1969 -- 12:13:38]
LAST ENTRY WAS HADE IN ERROR-RUN 3 HAS MOT BEGUN [10-30-1989 -- 12:23:56]
RUN 3 SCAN AT 11:40 [10-30-1989 -- 12:42:401
SPAN THC'S [10-30-1989 •- U:01:14]
ZERO THC'S [10-30-1989 •- 14:07:53]
BACK ON STACK GAS [10-30-1989 -- 14:14:01]
END RUN 3 [10-30-1989 -- 15:29:18]
NITROGEN BIAS CHECK [10-30-1989 -- 16:01;22]
ON AMBIENT AIR AT 1646. [10-30-1989 •- 16:53:50]
SECONDARY ZERO CHECK WITH THC PRESSURES AT ZERO. [10-30-1989 -• 17:35:51]
ALL TIMES MENTIONED IN THE COMMENTS ARE 55 MINUTES AHEAD.
3.4
B-66
-------
RUN 4 - 02, CO2, CO
MAIM DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
ROLLING
AVERAGE
TIME
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1600
1601
1602
DECIMAL
TIHE
11.00
11.02
11.03
11.05
11.07
11.08
11.10
11.12
11.13
11.15
11.17
11.18
11.20
11.22
11.23
11.25
11.27
11.28
11.30
11.32
11.33
11.35
11.37
11.38
11.40
11.42
11.43
11.45
11.47
11.48
11.50
11.52
11.53
11.55
11.57
11.58
11.60
11.62
11.63
11.65
11.67
11.68
11.70
11.72
11.73
11.75
11.77
11.78
11.80
15.78
15.80
15.82
15.83
15.85
15.87
15.88
15.90
15.92
15.93
15.95
15.97
15.98
16.00
16.02
16.03
02
4.3
4.3
4.5
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.0
3.3
3.8
3.3
3.9
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.2
4.
4.
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.4
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.0
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.4
4.1
4.2
C02
CX)
30.3
30.7
31.0
30.1
30.3
30.3
30.5
30.5
31.0
31.3
30.5
31.0
30.7
30.6
31.1
30.7
30.3
31.2
31.5
31.4
31.2
31.4
30.9
30.5
30.6
30.3
30.7
30.5
30.8
31.2
30.6
30.8
31.0
30.6
31.0
31.0
30.8
31.1
31.3
30.5
30.7
31.2
30.7
30.4
30.6
31.0
30.7
30.4
30.9
30.8
31.0
31.0
31.2
30.7
30.6
30.9
30.8
30.5
30.9
31.0
30.4
30.5
31.5
-------
TIME DECIMAL
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
TIME
16.05
16.07
16.08
16.10
16.12
16.13
16.15
16.17
16.18
16.20
16.22
16.23
16.25
16.27
16.28
16.30
16.32
16.33
16.35
16.37
16.38
16.40
16.42
16.43
16.45
16.47
16.48
16.50
16.52
16.53
16.55
16.57
16.58
16.60
16.62
16.63
16.65
16.67
16.68
16.70
16.72
16.73
16.75
16.77
16.78
16.80
16.82
16.83
16.35
16.87
16.88
16.90
16.92
16.93
16.95
16.97
16.98
17.00
17.02
17.03
17.05
17.07
17.08
17.10
17.12
02
(X)
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.5
4.4
4.5
4.4
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.4
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.2
4.3
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.0
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.5
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.4
4.2
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.1
MAIN DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
C02 AT 7X 02 ROLLING
(X)
30.6
30.4
30.3
30.7
30.4
30.3
29.9
30.6
31.4
30.9
30.5
30.3
31.4
31.4
31.2
30.7
30.3
31.8
32.1
31.5
31.7
31.7
30.9
31.2
31.3
31.0
30.9
31.2
31.1
30.9
30.9
31.0
31.0
31.0
31.1
31.1
31.1
31.3
31.6
31.1
31.4
31.1
31.1
31.1
31.2
31.6
31.4
31.0
31.2
31.3
31.3
31.2
31.1
31.5
31.2
31.2
31.1
31.3
31.1
30.9
31.4
31.3
31.3
30.8
30.9
(ppm)
908
670
536
591
794
1141
923
595
674
1127
1428
874
620
664
1032
1484
858
848
1613
1402
1030
1604
1025
846
1012
1051
863
960
1103
958
960
937
882
762
777
805
744
856
841
917
853
953
728
943
955
1079
1093
1054
912
998
1054
1066
1011
1099
1209
988
1022
751
1070
947
960
1009
1069
1181
794
(ppm) AVERAGE
759
559
449
500
672
965
778
497
566
947
1202
729
517
555
860
1242
711
698
1331
1163
849
1330
850
703
844
879
722
803
928
807
811
792
745
644
657
681
628
718
704
768
714
801
612
787
793
399
911
878
757
828
878
888
840
911
1005
320
851
625
896
788
798
838
886
981
658
744
749
751
755
758
759
763
771
778
791
798
801
801
794
798
801
801
806
813
821
821
02
(X)
19.5
19.5
19.5
19.7
19.6
19.6
19.6
19.4
19.4
19.4
19.6
19.5
19.6
19.4
19.4
19.5
19.3
19.3
19.5
19.6
19.6
19.7
19.6
19.6
19.6
19.7
19.7
19.8
19.9
20.0
20.1
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.0
20.1
20.1
20.0
20.0
19.9
19.9
20.0
20.0
19.9
20.0
20.0
19.8
19.7
19.6
19.5
19.6
19.5
19.5
19.5
19.3
19.2
19.1
19.0
18.9
18.9
18.8
18.8
18.7
18.5
BYPASS DUCT
CARSON MONOXIDE
C02 AT 7X 0 ROLLING
(X)
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.0
3.2
3.0
3.2
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.4
3.6
3.5
3.7
3.7
3.5
3.8
4.0
3.6
3.6
3.7
3.4
3.4
3.6
3.5
3.4
3.5
3.5
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.6
3.8
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.7
3.8
3.8
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.6
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.7
3.8
3.8
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.6
3.7
3.6
3.7
3.6
3.7
3.6
3.6
3.5
3.4
3.8
(ppm)
166
66
40
23
18
15
9
22
49
80
71
55
65
91
236
241
164
449
751
467
585
549
280
286
337
224
151
175
126
69
52
32
21
13
14
12
25
27
73
66
40
24
20
33
34
41
53
54
57
65
60
57
51
55
34
41
34
40
35
50
98
90
112
71
45
(ppm) AVERAGE
1555
606
369
241
181
152
87
192
417
714
685
509
634
794
2075
2173
1363
3611
6912
4505
5889
5913
2304
2782
3419
2379
1594
1961
1664
959
771
456
299
173
192
174
369
428
1060
885
508
315
265
443
453
563
730
638
613
643
577
563
484
508
325
334
261
284
244
337
655
579
717
438
249
1167
1175
1183
1191
1200
1210
1218
1226
1229
1229
1229
1229
1228
1228
1216
1184
1169
1168
1174
1178
1179
B-68
-------
MAIN DUCT
BYPASS DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
TIME
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
DECIMAL
TIME
17.13
17.15
17.17
17.18
17.20
17.22
17.23
17.25
17.27
17.28
17.30
17.32
17.33
17.35
17.37
17.38
17.40
17.42
17.43
17.45
17.47
17.48
17.50
17.52
17.53
17.55
17.57
17.58
17.60
17.62
17.63
17.65
17.67
17.68
17.70
17.72
17.73
17.75
17.77
17.78
17.80
17.82
17.83
17.85
17.87
17.88
17.90
17.92
17.93
17.95
17.97
17.98
18.00
18.02
18.03
18.05
18.07
18.08
18.10
18.12
18.13
18.15
18.17
18.18
18.20
02
(X)
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.4
4.4
4.3
4.3
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.5
4.3
4.4
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.2
4.1
4.2
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.6
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.4
4.5
C02
(X)
31.4
30.9
31.1
31.2
30.8
31.3
31.0
31.2
31.1
30.5
31.3
30.6
30.6
31.0
30.7
30.6
30.8
30.8
30.7
30.9
30.8
31.0
30.5
30.9
30.7
30.8
30.2
30.6
30.3
30.3
30.5
30.3
30.6
30.5
30.8
30.1
30.0
30.6
30.5
30.5
31.3
31.3
31.3
31.0
31.0
30.6
30.1
30.9
31.1
30.8
31.2
31.2
30.7
30.7
30.7
30.0
30.0
30.5
30.3
30.6
30.7
30.5
30.6
30.7
30.5
(ppn)
947
1102
746
1191
1141
1070
1289
972
1307
863
823
970
734
970
893
788
761
840
664
774
646
806
721
771
795
797
614
635
879
650
783
671
807
654
734
786
500
589
910
676
904
860
1114
797
631
940
882
773
1257
1000
1051
1170
934
654
883
933
624
879
783
624
918
700
654
1058
948
AT 7X 02
(ppm)
785
916
617
992
949
886
1071
808
1097
722
691
820
617
819
756
668
643
710
559
651
541
679
607
648
667
675
519
538
749
551
665
567
682
553
624
671
423
495
767
562
749
711
922
663
528
790
736
641
1045
830
870
974
784
549
746
795
528
746
665
526
774
589
551
891
804
ROLLING
AVERAGE
818
820
822
829
830
824
830
835
844
842
332
834
833
824
817
814
803
301
798
795
789
789
785
781
778
776
772
768
770
768
768
767
766
764
761
761
754
752
752
748
746
742
743
742
737
735
733
729
732
729
729
731
734
728
728
728
722
720
715
713
712
707
706
704
702
02
(X>
18.4
18.4
18.3
18.3
18.3
18.1
18.2
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.9
17.8
17.6
17.5
17.4
17.4
17.3
17.4
17.4
17.3
17.2
17.1
17.0
17.0
17.1
17.0
17.1
17.1
17.0
16.9
16.9
16.9
16.8
16.8
16.8
16.3
16.8
16.7
16.8
16.8
16.8
17.0
17.0
16.9
17.1
17.0
16.9
16.9
17.1
17.1
17.3
17.4
17.4
17.4
17.3
17.3
17.3
17.3
17.3
17.4
17.6
C02
(X)
3.7
3.7
3.9
3.5
3.7
3.6
3.4
3.8
3.4
3.7
3.6
3.3
3.5
3.4
3.2
3.4
3.6
3.5
3.7
3.5
3.6
3.3
3.4
3.3
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.2
3.3
3.1
3.3
3.2
3.4
3.4
3.1
3.5
3.7
3.5
3.8
3.8
4.0
3.7
3.5
3.5
3.3
3.2
3.6
3.3
3.6
3.7
3.5
3.2
3.3
3.1
2.9
3.1
3.2
3.1
3.4
3.4
3.2
3.4
3.2
2.8
CARBON MONOXIDE
46
35
79
119
72
81
57
39
36
19
18
10
9
8
7
5
6
5
10
15
7
6
8
8
5
5
2
2
0
3
5
2
4
3
16
13
5
26
30
39
53
43
44
25
21
38
34
51
52
31
52
48
25
14
16
11
7
5
2
5
9
7
6
8
7
AT 7X 0
250
186
402
622
367
391
285
177
164
83
78
46
38
38
33
20
23
20
40
59
27
23
31
29
19
17
6
8
1
10
19
7
14
10
55
44
18
88
100
131
197
156
146
83
70
130
120
177
183
109
175
165
90
52
61
44
26
20
8
20
3A
25
22
33
27
ROLLING
AVERAGE
1180
1182
1185
1189
1183
1178
1174
1167
1156
1123
1088
1066
1007
892
818
720
622
575
530
474
434
408
376
349
333
320
313
308
305
302
300
294
287
269
255
248
243
240
234
229
223
213
205
196
186
179
172
166
161
157
155
153
150
147
142
132
123
111
104
100
97
94
87
78
72
B-69
-------
MAIN DUCT
BYPASS DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
TIME DECIMAL
TIME
1813 18.22
18H 18.23
1815 18.25
1816 18.27
1C17 18.28
i818 18.30
iS19 18.32
1820 18.33
1821 18.35
1822 18.37
1823 18.38
1824 18.40
1825 18.42
Mininuip
Maximum*
Average*
Zero drift-
(X of span)
Span drift*
(X of span)
Error Est.»
02
(X)
4.4
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.2
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.3
4.3
3.8
4.6
4.3
0.88
0.04
0.11
C02
(X)
30.1
30.3
30.9
30.2
30.6
31.2
30.8
30.9
31.0
31.2
30.5
30.7
31.1
29.9
32.1
30.9
2.74
1.41
0.76
519
677
1163
664
592
1090
982
826
981
905
807
604
891
115
3571
946
4.91
4.18
78.19
AT 7X 02
(pprn)
437
565
976
560
494
912
823
693
821
764
682
507
748
97
2908
791
ROLLING
AVERAGE
694
686
689
680
676
680
680
681
681
681
681
679
680
02
(X)
17.6
17.3
17.3
17.4
17.3
17.4
17.5
17.5
17.6
17.6
17.6
17.5
17.5
16.7
20.1
18.3
0.08
5.67
1.05
C02
(X)
3.2
3.7
3.2
3.2
3.6
3.5
3.3
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.3
3.8
3.7
2.8
4.0
3.4
0.73
0.57
0.11
CARBON MONOXIDE
(ppn)
6
11
15
8
16
34
22
11
11
11
8
8
20
-6
751
49
2.81
4.24
24.19
AT 7X 0
23
41
56
33
60
133
87
44
43
46
32
33
78
-25
6912
425
ROLLING
AVERAGE
66
62
60
58
57
58
59
59
59
59
59
60
61
Comments:
LINEARITY CHECK CO 392.3 PPM 110-31-1989 -- 09:31:39]
LINEARITY CHECK CO 148.2 PPM [10-31-1989 -- 09:40:10]
LINEARITY CHECK 02 6.044X [10-31-1989 -- 09:52:05]
LINEARITY CHECK C02 5.957X C10-31-1989 -- 10:21:16]
ALL ANALYZERS PASSED LINEARITY CHECK [10-31-1989 -- 10:22:36]
BYPASS AT 20 INCHES LESS THAN 5 ON PYREX [10-31-1989 -- 10:29:35]
MAIN AT 22 INCHES 20 AND 25 ON PYREX- SAMPLE LINES PASSED LEAK CHECK I Ml! [10-31-1989 --
ON STACK GAS [10-31-1989 •- 10:35:54]
BEGIN RUN4 [10-31-1989 -• 10:59:23]
TEST STOPPED [10-31-1989 •- 11:52:27]
RESTARTED SAMPLING. [10-31-1989 -- 15:53:19]
CHANGED LIOH ON MAIN MANIFOLD. [10-31-1989 -- 15:55:12]
END RUN4 [10-31-1989 -- 18:31:14]
MAIN AT 22 INCHES 5 AND 15 ON PYREX [10-31-1989 -- 18:41:23]
BYPASS AT 20 INCHES LESS THAN 5 ON PYREX--LEAK CHECK OKI!!!! [10-31-1989 -- 18:42:09]
B-70
-------
RUN 4 - THC
COLD THC
BYPASS MAIN
AT 7X 02 AT 7X 02
(ppm) Cppm) (ppm) (ppm)
HEATED THC
BYPASS MAIN
AT 7X 02 AT 7X 02
(ppm) DRY (ppm) DRY
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1600
1601
1602
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
15
16
16
16
.00
.02
.03
.05
.07
.08
.10
.12
.13
.15
.17
.18
.20
.22
.23
.25
.27
.28
.30
.32
.33
.35
.37
.38
.40
.42
.43
.45
.47
.48
.50
.52
.53
.55
.57
.58
.60
.62
.63
.65
.67
.68
.70
.72
.73
.75
.77
.78
.80
.78
.80
.82
.83
.85
.87
.88
.90
.92
.93
.95
.97
.98
.00
.02
.03
0.8 4.1
0.3 4.1
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.<
0.8 4.
0.7 3.(
0.7 3.(
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.(
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.7 3.(
0.7 3.(
0.8 4.
0.7 3.(
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.<
0.7 3.1
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
0.8 4.
7.1
6.9
6.9
6.8
6.9
6.9
7.2
7.2
7
7.1
7.2
7.1
7.2
6.9
7.1
7.1
> 8.8
i 9.3
> 10.4
> 9
i 7.7
i 7.3
i 7.2
i 7
i 7.3
i 7.6
i 7.4
i 7.3
7
i 7.2
i 7.2
i 7
S 7.3
7.1
7.3
7.6
I 7.3
7.1
i a
S 7.4
1 7
S 7.1
i 7.3
S 7.4
S 7.1
7.6
7.4
7.3
7
7.2
7.4
7
7.2
7.6
7.3
7
7.2
7.3
7.1
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.1
6.0
5.8
5.8
5.7
5.8
5.8
6.0
6.0
5.9
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.8
6.0
6.0
7.4
7.8
8.7
7.5
6.5
6.1
6.0
5.9
6.1
6.4
6.2
6.1
5.9
6.0
6.0
5.9
6.1
6.0
6.1
6.4
6.1
6.0
6.7
6.2
5.9
6.0
6.1
6.2
6.0
6.4
6.2
6.1
5.9
6.0
6.2
5.9
6.0
6.4
6.1
5.9
6.0
6.1
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.1
6.0
0
0
0
0
-0.1
0
-0.1
0
0
-0.1
0
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
•0.
-0.
-0.
•0.
-0.
0
0
0
0
0.2
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
•0.6
0.0
-0.6
0.0
0.0
-0.6
0.0
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
•0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.1
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
4.5
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.4
3.4
3.9
3.4
3.4
3.9
3.4
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
9.5
9.1
9.2
8.8
8.9
8.8
9.2
9.1
8.7
9
8.9
8.9
8.9
8.4
8.8
8.7
10.8
10
11.9
9.4
9
8.6
8.5
8.4
8.8
8.7
8.8
8.6
8.3
8.7
8.5
8.3
8.7
8.4
8.8
9
8.7
8.5
8.7
8.4
8.1
8.3
8.6
8.5
8.3
9
8.7
8.5
8.9
9.3
9.4
8.8
9.2
9.6
9.2
9
9.3
9.4
9.2
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.2
9.9
9.5
9.6
9.2
9.3
9.2
9.6
9.5
9.1
9.4
9.3
9.3
9.3
8.7
9.2
9.1
11.2
10.4
12.4
9.3
9.4
9.0
8.9
8.7
9.2
9.1
9.2
9.0
8.6
9.1
8.9
8.6
9.1
8.7
9.2
9.4
9.1
8.9
9.1
8.7
8.4
8.6
9.0
8.9
8.6
9.4
9.1
8.9
9.3
9.7
9.8
9.2
9.6
JO.O
9.6
9.4
9.7
9.8
9.6
9.6
9.7
9.8
9.6
COMMENTS
SAMPLING BEGUN
SAMPLING STOPPED
DUE TO MM5
MECHANICAL FAILURE
SAMPLING RESUMED
B-71
-------
TIME DECIMAL
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1633
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
1706
1707
TIME
16.05
16.07
16.08
16.10
16.12
16.13
16.15
16.17
16.13
16.20
16.22
16.23
16.25
16.27
16.28
16.30
16.32
16.33
16.35
16.37
16.38
16.40
16.65
16.67
16.68
16.70
16.72
16.73
16.75
16.77
16.78
16.80
16.82
16.83
16.85
16.87
16.88
16.90
16.92
16.93
16.95
16.97
16.98
17.00
17.02
17.03
17.05
17.07
17.08
17.10
17.12
BYPASS
COLO THC
MAIN
HEATED THC
AT 7X 02 AT TX, 02
(ppn)
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.3
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
(ppn) (ppn)
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
7.3
7.3
7.1
6.6
6.5
6.3
7.2
7
6.6
6.4
6.3
7.1
7.1
6.7
6.9
7
4.1 7
4.1 6.3
4.1 7
4.1 6.3
4.1 7.2
4.2 «
4.2 *
4.2 *
4.3 *
4.3 *
4.3 *
4.4 *
4.4 *
4.4 *
4.5 *
4.5 *
4.5 *
4.5 •
4.6 *
4.6 *
4.6 *
4.7 6.9
4.1 6.9
4.1 6.9
4.1 7.1
4.1 7.1
4.
4.
4.
4€
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4.
4,
§
*
4^
/
4.
4
4_
4.
4,
6.9
7
6.9
6.9
7
6.9
6.9
6.3
6.3
7
6.9
6.7
6.7
7.1
6.9
6.6
6.5
6.6
6.7
6.6
6.6
6.8
4.1 6.5
(ppm)
6.1
6.1
6.0
5.5
5.4
5.7
6.0
5.9
5.5
5.4
5.7
6.0
6.0
5.6
5.8
5.9
5.9
5.7
5.9
5.7
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
6.0
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.9
5.8
5.8
5.8 *
5.8 *
5.8
5.8
5.8
6.0
6.0
5.8
5.9
5.8
5.8
5.9
5.8
5.8
5.7
5.7
5.9
5.8
5.6
5.6
6.0
5.8
5.5
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.5
5.5
5.7
5.4
BYPASS
AT
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.8
1.6
1.3
1.1
1
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0
0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
n 02
DRY
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.7
5.0
5.2
5.5
5.7
6.0
6.2
6.5
6.7
7.0
7.2
7.5
7.7
8.0
8.2
8.5
8.7
9.0
7.3
6.2
5.6
5.0
4.5
4.5
3.4
3.4
2.8
2.3
2.2
1.7
1.7
1.1
1.1
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.0
0.0
•0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
-0.6
MAIN
AT
(ppn)
9.5
9.4
9.2
3.6
3.6
9
9.4
9.1
8.6
8.6
9.1
9.1
9
8.6
8.9
9.1
9
8.8
9
8.3
9.2
10.8
8.7
8.5
8.6
8.5
8.2
8.5
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.4
8.4
8.4
8.3
8.6
8.5
8.3
8.4
8.9
8.7
8.4
8.5
8.3
8.5
8.3
8.4
8.7
8.3
7X 02 COMMENTS
DRY
9.9
9.8
9.6
9.0
9.0
9.4
9.8
9.5
9.0
9.0
9.5
9.5
9.4
9.0
9.3
9.5
9.4
9.2
9.4
9.2
9.6
9.7 ZERO AND
9.3
9.9
10.0
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
11.0
11.1
11.2 *SPAM CHECK
11.2
9.1
8.9
9.0
8.9
8.5
8.9
8.6
8.7
8.9
8.7
8.7
8.7
8.6
9.0
8.9
8.6
8.7
9.3
9.1
8.7
8.9
8.6
8.9
8.6
8.7
9.1
8.6
B-72
-------
COLD THC
BYPASS MAIM
TIME DECIMAL
TIME
1708
1709
1710
1711
1712
1713
1714
1715
1716
1717
1718
1719
1720
1721
1722
1723
1724
1725
1726
1727
1728
1729
1730
1731
1732
1733
1734
1735
1736
1737
1738
1739
1740
1741
1742
1743
1744
1745
1746
1747
1748
1749
1750
1751
1752
1753
1754
1755
1756
1757
1758
1759
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
17.
13.
13.
13.
13.
13.
13.
13.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
18.
13
15
17
18
20
22
23
25
27
28
30
32
33
35
37
38
40
42
43
45
47
48
50
52
53
55
57
58
60
62
63
65
67
68
70
72
73
75
77
78
80
82
83
85
87
88
90
92
93
95
97
98
00
02
03
05
07
08
10
12
13
15
17
18
20
AT 7X02
(ppm) (ppm)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.8 4.
AT 7X
(ppm)
6
.7 3.6 6.
.8 4.
6
.7 3.6 6.
5
6
5
5
.7 3.6 6.4
.7 3.6 6.
.7 3.6 6.
.7 3.6 6.
.7 3.6 6.
.7 3.6 6.
.7 3.6 6.
.7 3.6 6.
.7 3.6 6.
.7 3.6 6.
.7 3.6 6.
.7 3.6 5.
.7 3.6
.7 3.6 6.
.7 3.6
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
•6 3.
.6 3.
6
5
6
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
.5 2.6 6.
.5 2.6 6.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
.6 3.
6
6
6
6
.5 2.6 6.
.5 2.6
.5 2.6 6.
.5 2.6 6.
.6 3.1
.6 3.1
.6 3.1
.6 3.1
.6 3.1
.6 3.1
0.6 3.1
0.6 3.1
0.6 3.1
0.6 3.1
0.6 3.1
0.6 3.1
0.6 3.1
6
5
5
5
]
5.
6.
6.
6
5
3
4
2
2
3
2
1
1
9
6
1
6
1
9
2
9
6
9
6
8
7
8
7
9
7
6
3
3
3
2
1
2
5
4
3
5
5
2
3
3
2
2
6
1
1
1
8
9
6
8
6
6
9
2
1
5.9
.
6
6.2
02
(ppn)
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
5
5
4
5
4
5
4
5
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
4
4
J
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
.4
.5
.4
.4
.4
.5
.4
.3
.4
.2
.2
.3
.2
.1
.1
.9
.0
.1
.0
.1
.9
.2
.9
.0
.9
.0
.9
.8
.9
.8
.9
.8
.0
.9
.9
.3
.2
.1
.2
.4
.4
.3
.4
.4
.2
.3
.3
.2
.2
.0
.1
.1
5-1
4
4
s
4
5
5
4
5
5
4
5
5
.9
.9
.0
.9
.0
.0
.9
.2
.1
.9
.0
.2
HEATED THC
BYPASS MAIM
AT 7X 02 AT 7X 02
(ppn) DRY (ppm) DRY
COMMENTS
-0.1
-0.1
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
•0.2
-0.2
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
•0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.5
•0.5
-0.5
-0.5
•0.5
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
•0.4
-0.4
•0.4
-0.4
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
•0.3
•0.3
•0.3
-0.3
•0.3
•0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
•0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
•0.2
•0.2
-0.2
•0.2
-0.2
•0.2
•0.2
-0.6
-0.6
-1.1
-1.1
-1.1
-1.1
•1.1
•1.7
-1.7
-1.7
•1.7
-2.2
-2.2
-2.2
-2.2
-2.2
•2.2
•2.2
-2.2
-2.2
-2.2
-2.2
-2.8
-2.8
-2.8
-2.8
-2.8
-2.2
-2.2
•2.2
-2.2
•2.2
-2.2
-2.2
-2.2
•1.7
•1.7
•1.7
•1.7
•1.7
-1.7
-1.7
-1.7
-1.7
•1.7
-1.7
-1.7
-1.7
-1.7
-1.7
•1.7
•1.7
-1.7
-1.
-1.
-1.
-1.
-1.
•1.
-1.
•1.
•1.
•1.
-1.1
•1.1
8.4
8.6
8.4
8.5
8.3
8.6
8.5
8.2
8.6
8.3
8.3
8.4
8.2
8.1
8.2
8
8.1
8.3
8.1
8.3
8
8.4
8
8.2
8.1
8.3
8.1
8
8.2
7.6
3
7.7
8
7.8
7.8
8.3
8.1
7.9
8.1
8.4
8.2
8
8.3
8.2
7.8
8
8
7.7
7.9
7.6
7.8
7.8
7.9
7.5
7.7
7.7
7.4
7.7
7.8
7.6
8
7.8
7.5
7.7
8
8.7
9.0
8.7
3.9
3.6
9.0
3.9
3.5
9.0
3.6
8.6
8.7
8.5
3.4
3.5
3.3
8.4
8.6
8.4
3.6
8.3
8.7
8.3
8.5
8.4
8.6
8.4
8.3
8.5
7.9
8.3
8.0
8.3
8.1
8.1
8.6
8.4
8.2
8.4
8.7
8.5
8.3
8.6
8.5
8.1
8.3
8.3
8.0
8.2
7.9
8.1
8.1
8.2
7.8
8.0
8.0
7.7
8.0
8.1
7.9
8.3
8.1
7.8
8.0
8.3
B-73
-------
COLD
BYPASS
TIME DECIMAL
TIME (ppm)
1813 18.22
18U 18.23
1815 18.25
1816 18.27
1817 18.28
1818 18.30
1819 18.32
1820 18.33
1821 18.35
1822 18.37
1823 18.38
1824 18.40
1825 18.42
1826 18.43
1939 19.65
1940 19.67
1941 19.68
1942 19.70
1943 19.72
1944 19.73
1945 19.75
1946 19.77
1947 19.78
1948 19.30
1949 19.82
1950 19.83
1951 19.85
1952 19.87
1953 19.88
1954 19.90
1955 19.92
1956 19.93
1957 19.95
1958 19.97
1959 19.98
2000 20.00
2001 20.02
2002 20.03
2003 20.05
2004 20.07
2005 20.08
2006 20.10
2007 20.12
2008 20.13
2009 20.15
2010 20.17
2011 20.18
2012 20.20
Run Average*
Ambient Air
For Tine Peroid
Zero Orift«
(X of span)
Span Drift*
<% of span)
Error Est.«
For Tin* Peroid
Zero Drift"
5.0
5.0
5.2
5.2
4.9
5.0
5.0
4.9
4.9
4.9
5.0
4.9
5.0
5.6
1548-1623
0.18
0.22
0.18
0.31
1.93
0.44
HEATED THC
BYPASS MAIN
AT 7X 02 AT 7X 02
(ppm) DRY (ppm) DRY
COMMENTS
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
•0.2
-0.2
•0.2
-0.2
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0
-0.4
0.1
0.4
0.07
1.35
0.07
0.65
1.48
0.64
1.2
7.7
7.6
7.9
7.8
7.5
7.7
7.6
7.4
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.4
7.6
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
0.8
0.1
8.5
1.3
0.06
10.43
0.95
0.49
1.84
0.64
8.0
7.9
8.2
8.1
7.8
8.0
7.9
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.9
7.7
7.9
SAMPLING ENDED
AMBIENT AIR CHECK
9.0
B-74
-------
COLO THC HEATED THC
BYPASS MAIN BYPASS HAIN
TIME DECIMAL AT 7% 02 AT 7X 02 AT 7X 02 AT 7X 02 COMMENTS
TIME (ppm) Cppn) (ppm) (ppra) (ppro) DRY (ppm) DRY
For Tim Ptroid 1640-1825
Zero Drift- 0.26 0.64 1.42 0.09
(X of span)
Span Drift- 3.07 3.27 3.71 1.46
(X of span)
Error Est.« 0.28 0.85 1.41 0.21
* DATA CALCULATED BY EXTRAPOLATION.
Cold THC corrected to 7X 02 - Raw value x ((14/(21-02 cone.))
Hot THC corr. to 7X 02, dry - Raw value x ((14/C21-02 conc.»/(1-Moist. cone.)
Comments:
LINEARITY CHECK 20.35 PPM PROPANE [10-31-1989 •• 11:29:07J
LINEARITY CHECK PROPANE 49.09 PPM [10-31-1989 -- 11:35:17]
ALL THC'S PASSED LINEARITY CHECK [10-31-1989 -- 11:41:43]
ON STACK GAS [10-31-1989 -- 11:43:06]
BEGIN RUN4-THC [10-31-1989 -- 11:54:38]
TEST STOPPED [10-31-1989 -- 12:47:50]
ZERO THC'S [10-31-1989 -- 12:59:32]
SPAN THC'S [10-31-1989 -- 13:11:58]
BACK ON STACK GAS [10-31-1989 -- 13:15:22}
RESTARTED SAMPLING. [10-31-1989 -- 16:48:49]
ZERO THC'S [10-31-1989 -- 17:19:17]
SPAN THC'S [10-31-1989 -• 17:27:33]
END RUN4 [10-31-1989 -- 19:26:431
NITROGEN LINE UAS NOT CONNECTED DURING PREVIOUS SECTION OF LINE BIAS CHECK. [10-31-1989 -- 20:28:34]
NITROGEN LINE UAS PROBABLY NOT CONNECTED DURING RUNS 2 THROUGH 4. [10-31-1989 -- 20:30:55]
NOW IN AMBIENT AIR CHECK. [10-31-1989 -- 20:31:42]
HAVE BEEN PULLING IN AMBIENT AIR FROM TRAILER DURING 2 THROUGH 4. [10-31-1989 -- 20:33:28]
ENTER KEY IS STIK1NG BADLY. THIS SEGMENT MUST BE SPLICED INTO RUN4THC DUE TO MACHINE LOCKUP AT END OF TES
ALL TIMES MENTIONED IN THE COMMENTS ARE 55 MINUTES AHEAD.
B-75
-------
RUN 5 - 02, CO2, CO
HAIN DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
TIME
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1143
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
DECIMAL
TIME
11.50
11.52
11.53
11.55
11.57
11.58
11.60
11.62
11.63
11.65
11.67
11.68
11.70
11.72
11.73
11.75
11.77
11.78
11.80
11.82
11.83
11.85
11.87
11.88
11.90
11.92
11.93
11.95
11.97
11.98
12.00
12.02
12.03
12.05
12.07
12.08
12.10
12.12
12.13
12.15
12.17
12.18
12.20
12.22
12.23
12.25
12.27
12.28
12.30
12.32
12.33
12.35
12.37
12.38
12.40
12.42
12.43
12.45
12.47
12.48
12.50
12.52
12.53
12.55
12.57
02
15
19
30
16
11
16
23
15
10
36
38
21
32
33
17
20
59
138
99
78
81
49
49
59
30
22
26
59
57
69
98
128
144
120
53
40
98
115
61
51
109
67
29
22
37
32
17
42
104
53
20
32
56
33
24
11
16
19
19
24
19
36
58
54
28
AT 7X 02
(ppm)
41
51
84
46
30
45
67
41
29
104
110
60
94
97
51
57
167
395
281
221
237
144
146
173
86
62
74
167
163
207
298
386
423
351
155
115
280
336
183
155
326
199
86
65
109
96
51
127
330
165
60
93
165
100
76
34
48
. 55
55
70
56
105
174
167
86
142
142
143
145
147
148
B-76
-------
MAIN DUCT
BYPASS DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
TIME
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
DECIMAL
TIME
12.58
12.60
12.62
12.63
12.65
12.67
12.68
12.70
12.72
12.73
12.75
12.77
12.78
12.80
12.82
12.83
12.85
12.87
12.88
12.90
12.92
12.93
12.95
12.97
12.98
13.00
13.02
13.03
13.05
13.07
13.08
13.10
13.12
13.13
13.15
13.17
13.18
13.20
13.22
13.23
13.25
13.27
13.28
13.30
13.32
13.33
13.35
13.37
13.38
13.40
13.42
13.43
13.45
13.47
13.48
13.50
13.52
13.53
13.55
13.57
13.58
13.60
13.62
13.63
13.65
02
(X)
3.9
3.9
3.9
4.0
4.0
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.2
4.2
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.1
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.9
4.1
4.0
3.9
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.0
4.0
3.9
3.9
3.9
3.8
3.9
3.9
3.9
4.0
4.0
4.0
3.9
3.9
4.0
3.9
4.0
4.1
4.0
4.0
4.1
4.0
3.9
3.9
C02
(X)
30.4
30.3
30.2
30.3
29.9
30.2
30.3
30.1
29.9
29.6
30.1
30.1
29.7
29.7
30.1
29.7
29.8
30.2
29.6
29.3
29.5
29.9
29.8
29.7
29.8
30.2
30.1
30.1
30.3
30.0
30.2
30.3
30.2
30.1
29.9
30.1
30.4
30.1
30.3
29.8
30.3
30.0
30.2
30.0
30.3
30.3
30.3
30.3
30.0
30.5
30.2
29.9
29.9
29.9
30.4
30.1
29.8
30.2
29.7
29.4
29.8
30.1
29.5
29.7
30.2
(ppn)
496
583
511
541
624
472
658
600
584
398
376
582
547
' 403
504
608
407
494
576
350
296
367
544
522
453
589
678
534
569
627
551
635
618
470
576
490
621
562
523
516
482
587
482
534
487
571
462
626
500
493
670
500
577
440
576
723
451
508
681
426
344
640
591
376
519
AT 755 02
405
478
419
445
512
387
542
494
484
329
311
484
455
333
416
501
336
409
477
290
245
304
450
430
371
482
555
437
466
512
449
519
511
388
472
400
510
462
431
424
399
483
397
437
399
466
376
512
409
404
552
412
475
359
471
594
368
417
563
351
283
530
486
309
425
ROLLING
AVERAGE
472
472
473
475
474
472
475
474
470
469
469
46S
464
462
461
460
458
458
457
455
450'
448
447
446
445
444
445
442
440
440
441
441
439
439
441
437
438
439
439
435
433
436
437
433
432
434
433
433
434
432
435
435
434
432
432
436
436
435
437
436
434
435
436
434
432
02
(X)
16.3
16.2
16.2
16.2
16.3
16.3
16.4
16.5
16.6
16.4
16.3
16.3
16.4
16.5
16.4
16.5
16.6
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.4
16.4
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.6
16.6
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.7
16.6
16.5
16.5
16.4
16.5
16.5
16.5
16.6
16.5
16.4
16.3
16.4
16.3
16.3
16.4
16.5
16.5
16.4
16.4
16.4
16.4
16.5
16.6
16.6
16.7
16.5
16.4
16.4
16.5
16.5
16.S
C02
(X)
3.4
3.3
3.5
3.4
3.3
3.3
3.1
3.0
3.0
3.2
3.4
3.2
3.0
3.2
3.2
3.0
3.0
3.1
3.0
2.9
3.1
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.1
3.1
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.3
3.2
3.2
3.2
3.1
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.4
3.5
3.3
3.3
3.3
3.2
3.3
3.2
3.4
3.3
3.0
3.0
3.1
2.9
3.1
3.4
3.3
3.1
3.2
3.3
CARBON
AT
(ppm) (
36
51
41
57
83
60
66
43
58
34
33
51
45
33
37
48
29
18
47
38
18
15
25
29
28
48
54
38
24
15 '
28
37
30
16
11
10
15
10
10
11
26
18
11
9
14
14
20
72
45
30
74
56
58
29
53
31
14
19
28
10
12
72
36
14
84
MONOXIDE
n 02
ppm)
108
146
117
167
246
176
201
135
183
102
99
153
137
101
113
148
91
55
146
118
55
45
75
89
87
150
172
120
75
47
86
115
95
53
33
31
45
29
32
36
80
58
34
28
42
42
58
215
139
94
233
172
177
86
161
97
45
61
91
32
36
221
112
43
260
ROLLING
AVERAGE
149
150
151
154
156
157
159
160
162
162
163
163
159
156
154
152
151
150
149
150
150
149
148
147
144
142
138
133
129
127
127
124
120
118
116
111
108
107
107
105
105
105
104
99
97
96
96
97
97
98
101
103
105
105
107
108
107
105
104
103
101
103
103
101
101
B-77
-------
HA IN DUCT
BYPASS DUCT
CARBON MONOXIDE
TINE DECIMAL
TIME
1340 13.67
1341 13.68
1342 13.70
1343 13.72
1344 13.73
1345 13. /5
1346 1j.77
1347 1-.7S
1348 13.80
1349 13.82
1350 13.83
1351 13.85
1352 13.87
1353 13.88
1354 13.90
1355 13.92
1356 13.93
1357 13.95
1358 13.97
1359 13.98
1400 14.00
1401 14.02
1402 14.03
1403 14.05
1404 14.07
1405 14.08
1406 14.10
1407 14.12
1408 14.13
1409 14.15
1410 14.17
1411 14.18
1412 14.20
1413 14.22
1414 14.23
1415 14.25
1416 14.27
1417 14.28
Minimum*
Maximum*
Average*
Zero drift»
612
381
319
577
411
448
699
470
609
651
458
605
485
579
424
486
645
387
534
663
528
533
358
283
572
689
359
401
570
355
411
543
318
365
540
365
474
467
245
721
459
ROLLING
AVERAGE
436
433
431
432
433
436
439
440
444
448
447
452
453
455
457
461
467
466
467
472
473
473
471
468
469
473
471
469
472
470
470
471
468
467
469
468
468
470
02
(X)
16.6
16.7
16.6
16.6
16.4
16.3
16.4
16.4
16.5
16.6
16.7
16.7
16.7
16.8
16.8
16.8
17.0
17.0
17.1
17.0
16.8
17.0
17.0
16.9
16.9
17.0
16.9
16.9
16.8
16.7
16.6
16.7
16.7
16.6
16.8
16.8
16.8
16.7
15.8
17.1
16.4
0.21
3.24
0.56
C02
(X)
3.1
3.0
3.3
3.2
3.5
3.4
3.4
3.4
3.2
3.1
3.1
3.0
3.0
2.9
3.0
2.9
2.7
2.8
2.7
2.9
2.8
2.6
2.7
3.0
2.9
2.7
2.9
3.2
3.1
3.3
3.4
3.2
3.3
3.2
3.0
3.1
3.1
3.1
2.6
3.6
3.2
0.94
2.13
0.18
CARBON MONOXIDE
(ppm)
92
29
22
42
18
65
64
36
33
67
63
54
19
15
12
15
19
8
6
4
3
5
3
•0
5
3
3
17
22
13
28
25
12
20
29
14
9
5
-0
144
37
0.47
2.01
4.45
AT 7X 02
(Ppn»
290
95
71
133
54
195
196
109
259
215
206
176
61
48
40
51
66
26
20
15
9
17
11
•0
17
12
11
58
72
40
88
81
38
64
97
46
31
16
-0
423
113
ROLLING
AVERAGE
103
101
100
99
98
100
101
100
103
104
105
107
107
105
104
104
104
103
102
101
99
96
94
93
93
91
90
89
89
89
90
91
91
92
93
92
92
91
Comnents:
LINEARITY CHECK C02 5.957X [11-02-1989 - 09:39:34]
LINEARITY CHECK 02 6.044X [11-02-1989 -- 09:50:30]
LINEARITY CHECK CO 392.8 PPM [11-02-1989 •- 10:09:10]
LINEARITY CHECK CO 148.2 PPM [11-02-1989 -• 10:18:22]
ALL ANALYZERS PASSED LINEARITY CHECK [11-02-1989 -- 10:34:35]
BYPASS 20 INCHES 10 ON PYREX [11-02-1989 -- 10:43:23]
MAIN AT 22 INCHES 18 AND 32 ON PYREX [11-02-1989 -- 10:43:58]
SAMPLE LINES PASSED LEAK CHECK)11!111111 [11-02-1989 — 10:44:32]
ON STACK GAS [11-02-1989 -- 10:'.9:44]
CHANGED CAUSTIC ON MAIN CO MONIIOR. [11-02-1989 -- 11:04:42]
BEGIN RUN 5A [11-02-1989 -- 11:30:01]
PRINTER JAMMED. [11-02-1989 -- 13:55:59]
END OF RUN 5 [11-02-1989 -- 14:17:21]
FINAL LEAK CHECKS OK, BYPASS BOTH <5MM AT 20"HG, MAIN <10MM AT 22"HG. [11-02-1989 -- 14:25
B-78
-------
RUN 5 - THC
COLO THC
BYPASS DUCT MAIN DUCT
TIME DECIMAL 7X02 7X02
TIME (ppm) (ppo)
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1149
1150
1151
1152
1153
1154
1155
1156
1157
1158
1159
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
50 0.7 2.1
52 0.3 2.4
53 0.3 2.4
55 0.7 2.1
57 0.8 2.4
58 0.8 2.4
60 0.7 2.1
62 0.3 2.4
CppnO
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
63 0.3 2.4
65 0.3 2.4
67 0.8 2.4
68 0.8 2.4
70 0.3 2.4
72 0.7 2.1
73 0.7 2.1
75 0.7 2.1
77 0.7 2.1
78 0.8 2.4
80 0.8 2.4
82 0.8 2.4
83 0.8 2.4
85 0.8 2.4
87 0.8 2.4
11.88 0.8 2.4
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
11.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
90 0.8 2.4
92 0.7 2.1
93 0.7 2.1
95 0.7 2.1
97 0.7 2.
98 0.7 2.
00 0.7 2.
02 0.7 2.
03 0.7 2.
05 0.7 2.
07 0.7 2.
08 0.7 2.
10 0.7 2.
12.12 0.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
12.
13 0.
15 0.
17 0.
18 0.
20 0.
22 0.
23 0.
25 0.
27 0.
28 0.
30 0.
32 0.
33 0.
35 0.
37 0.
38 0.
40 0.
42 0.
43 0.
45 0.
47 0.
48 0.
50 0.
52 0.
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.1
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
53 0.7 2.
55 0.7 2.
57 0.7 2.
58 0.7 2.
60 0.7 2.
62 0.7 2.
63 0.8 2.
65 0.8 2.
67 0.7 2.
68 0.7 2.
70 0.8 2.4
72 0.8 2.4
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
6
.2
.1
.4
.2
.2
.3
.5
.4
6
.2
.3
.1
.2
.7
.8
.4
.4
.6
.3
.2
.5
.4
.5
.6
.4
.6
.5
.6
.6
.6
.7
.6
.5
.5
.6
.5
.4
.6
.4
.2
.4
.5
.3
.3
.6
.7
.4
.1
.2
.3
.2
.3
.4
.2
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.7
.6
.6
.6
.7
.7
.6
.6
.5
.5
.5
.3
.3
.2
.5
(ppm)
5.1
5.0
5.3
5.1
5.1
5.2
5.4
5.3
4.9
5.1
5.2
5.0
5.1
5.5
5.6
5.3
5.3
5.4
5.2
5.1
5.4
5.3
5.4
5.4
5.3
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.5
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.3
5.4
5.3
5.1
5.3
5.4
5.2
5.2
5.4
5.5
5.3
5.0
5.1
5.2
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.1
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.5
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.5
5.5
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.4
5.2
5.2
5.1
5.4
HOT THC
BYPASS DUCT MAIN DUCT
7X O2.dry 7X 02,dry
(ppm) (ppm)
-------
COLO THC
TIME DECIMAL
TIME
1244 12.73
1245 12.75
1246 12.77
1247 12.78
1248 12.80
1249 12.82
1250 12.83
1251 12.85
1252 12.87
1253 12.88
1254 12.90
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308 13.13
1309 13.15
1310 13.17
1311 13.18
1312 13.20
1313 13.22
1314 13.23
1315 13.25
1316 13.27
1317 13.28
1318 13.30
1319 13.32
1320 13.33
1321 13.35
1322 13.37
1323 13.38
1324 13.40
1325 13.42
1326 13.43
1327 13.45
1328 13.47
1329 13.48
1330 13.50
1331 13.52
1332 13.53
1333 13.55
1334 13.57
1335 13.58
1336 13.60
1337 13.62
1338 13.63
1339 13.65
1340 13.67
1341 13.68
1342 13.70
1343 13.72
1344 13.73
1345 13.75
1346 13.77
1347 13.78
1348 13.80
1349 13.82
1350 13.83
1351 13.85
1352 13.87
1353 13.88
1354 13.90
1355 13.92
1356 13.93
1357 13.95
BYPASS
(ppm)
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.3
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
DUCT
7X 02
Cpf»>
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.1
MAIN
(Ppn»
6.4
6.2
6.2
6.4
6.2
6.3
6.7
6.3
6.2
6.2
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.5
6.4
6.3
6.4
6.4
6.5
6.4
6.5
6.3
6.5
6.3
6.1
6.3
6.1
6.4
6.1
6
6.3
6.3
6.1
6.3
6.5
6.1
6.2
. 6.5
6.4
6.1
6.4
6.6
6.1
6.3
6.5
6.9
6.6
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.2
6.4
6.3
6.6
6.5
6.3
6.6
6.5
DUCT
7X 02
CPPm)
5.3
5.1
5.1
5.3
5.1
5.2
5.5
5.2
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.1
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.3
5.4
5.3
5.2
5.3
5.3
5.4
5.3
5.4
5.2
5.4
5.2
5.0
5.2
5.0
5.3
5.0
4.9
5.2
5.2
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.0
5.1
5.4
5.3
5.0
5.3
5.4
5.0
5.2
5.4
5.7
5.4
5.3
5 3
^ • W
5 3
J ••*
51
• 1
5.3
52
• £
5 4
J • •*
5.4
5 2
J • £
5 4
W »^f
5.4
HOT THC
BYPASS DUCT MAIM DUCT
7X 02,dry TX. 02,dry
(ppm) (ppn) (ppm) (ppm)
COMMENTS
7.6 7.7 0.5 1.6
7.3 7,4 0.6 2.0
7.4 7.5 0.6 2.0
7.6 7.7 0.6 2.0
7.3 7.4 0.5 1.6
7.4 7.5 0.6 2.0
7.8 7.9 0.6 2.0
7.4 7.5 0.6 2.0
7.4 7.5 0.6 2.0
7.6 0.6 2.0
7.6 2.0 ZERO AND
7.6 2.0 SPAN CHECK
7.6 2.0
7.6 2.1
7.6 2.1
7.7 2.1
7.7 2.1
7.7 2.1
7.7 2.2
7.7 2.2
7.7 2.2
7.8 2.2
7.8 2.2
7.8 2.3
7.7 7.8 0.7 2.3
8.1 8.2 0.7 2.3
8 8.1 0.7 2.3
8.2 8.3 0.7 2.3
8 8.1 0.7 2.3
8.2 8.3 0.7 2.3
8 8.1 0.7 2.3
7.8 7.9 0.7 2.3
7.9 8.0 0.6 2.0
8 8.1 0.6 2.0
8 8.1 0.6 2.0
7.8 7.9 0.6 2.0
8 8.1 0.6 2.0
7.7 7.8 0.6 2.0
8.1 8.2 0.6 2.0
7.8 7.9 0.6 2.0
7.6 7.7 0.6 2.0
7.9 8.0 0.6 2.0
7.7 7.8 0.6 2.0
8.1 8.2 0.6 2.0
7.7 7.8 0.6 2.0
7.7 7.8 0.6 2.0
8.1 8.2 0.6 2.0
7.9 8.0 0.6 2.0
7.7 7.8 0.6 2.0
8.1 8.2 0.6 2.0
8.2 8.3 0.6 2.0
7.6 7.7 0.6 2.0
7.9 8.0 0.7 2.3
8.1 8.2 0.6 2.0
7.8 7.9 0.6 2.0
7.5 7.6 0.6 2.0
8 8.1 0.7 2.3
8.1 8.2 0.6 2 0
7.5 7.6 0.6 2.0
7.9 8.0 0.6 2.0
8 8.1 0.7 2.3
8.2 8.3 0.6 2.0
8.1 8.2 0.6 2.0
7.8 7.9 0.6 2.0
7.9 8.0 0.6 2.0
8 8.1 0.6 2.0
7.8 7.9 0.6 2.0
8.1 8.2 0.6 2.o
7.9 8.0 0.6 2.0
8.3 8.4 0.6 2.0
8 8.1 0.7 2.3
7.8 7.9 0.7 2.3
8.1 8.2 0.7 2.3
7.9 8.0 0.7 2.3
B-80
-------
TIME DECIMAL
TIME
1358 13.97
1359 13.98
1400 14.00
1401 14.02
1402 14.03
1403 14.05
1404 14.07
1405 14.08
1406 14.10
1407 14.12
1408 14.13
1409 14.15
1410 14.17
1411 14.18
1412 14.20
1413 14.22
1414 14.23
1415 14.25
1416 14.27
1417 14.28
1418 14.30
1445 14.75
1446 14.77
1447 14.78
1448 14.80
1449 14.82
1450 14.83
1451 14.85
1452 14.87
1453 14.88
1454 14.90
1455 14.92
1456 14.93
1457 14.95
1458 14.97
1459 14.98
1500 15.00
1501 15.02
1502 15.03
1503 15.05
1504 15.07
1505 15.08
1506 15.10
1507 15.12
1508 15.13
1509 15.15
1510 15.17
1511 15.18
1512 15.20
1513 15.22
1514 15.23
1515 15.25
1516 15.27
1517 15.28
1518 15.30
1519 15.32
1520 15.33
1521 15.35
1522 15.37
1523 15.38
1524 15.40
1525 15.42
1526 15.43
1527 15.45
1528 15.47
1529 15.48
1530 15.50
1531 15.52
1532 15.53
1533 15.55
1534 15.57
1535 15.58
1536 15.60
1537 15.62
BYPASS
(ppn)
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-0.2
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.4
-0.4
-0.4
0.0
0.6
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
COLO
DUCT
7X 02
(ppn)
2.1
2.4
2.4
2.1
2.1
2.1
2.4
2.1
2.4
2.1
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.1
THC
MAIN
(ppm)
6.4
6.4
6.3
6.8
6.8
6.4
6.2
6.6
6.4
6.3
6.5
6.4
6.2
6.5
6.6
6.2
6.5
6.4
6.5
6.8
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
04
.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
Om
.2
0.1
0.2
0.2
Om
.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
Om
.2
Om
.2
Om
.2
04
.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.2
Ofk
.0
-0.3
•0.4
•0.5
•0.5
-0.5
-0.5
•0.5
Om,
.2
.
DUCT
n 02
-------
TIME DECIMAL
TIME
1538
1539
1540
1541
1542
1543
1544
1545
1546
154?
1:>48
15,9
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
15.63
15.65
15.67
15.68
15.70
15.72
15.73
15.75
15.77
15.78
15.80
15.82
15.83
15.85
15.87
15.88
15.90
15.92
15.93
15.95
15.97
15.98
16.00
16.02
16.03
16.05
16.07
16.08
COLO
BYPASS DUCT
7X 02
(ppm) (ppm)
0.3
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
THC
MAIN DUCT
n 02
(ppm) (ppm)
Run Average*
N2 Bias Aver
0.7
0.3
2.2
For Time Peroid 1130-1253
Zero Drift*
(X of span)
Span Drift*
(X of span)
Error Est.*
0.04
0.75
0.05
For Time Peroid 1308-1417
Zero Drift«
(X of span)
Span Drift*
(X of span)
Error Est.«
0.15
0.26
0.15
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.1
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
0.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
6.4
0.5
0.32
2.40
0.47
0.05
1.38
0.14
5.3
HOT THC
BYPASS DUCT
7X 02, dry
-------
APPENDIX B-6
ORGANIC MASS DATA
B-83
-------
NOTE: QC sampling times were reported by the operator prior to actually
Injecting the sample. Reported times may be premature by up to 10 m1n. Also,
a 10-ft length of sampling line was used to transfer sample gas from the hot
THC sample line to the field GC. A low flow rate was maintained through this
line; therefore, GC sampling times do not correlate directly (I.e., minute for
minute) with THC sampling times.
Method 0010—No significant problems were encountered with the Method 0010
trains. Ail test runs at each duct fell within the acceptable range for
1sok1net1c performance, and all leak checks were passed.
B-85
-------
ORGANIC MASS DATA
RUN*
Main Duct
1
2
3
4
RUN TIME
(24-hour)
1548-2012
1159-1440
1139-1431
1100-1147
1548-1825
SAMP. #
R1SS8
R1SS9
R1SS10
R1SS11
R1SS12
R1SS13
R1SS14
R1SS15
R1SS16
R1SS17
R1SS18
R1SS19
TIME
1557
1616
1645
1720
1739
1757
1815
1834
1852
1910
1930
2002
Run Average
R2SS2
R2SS3
R2SS4
R2SS5
R2SS6
R2SS7
R2SS8
1222
1241
1259
1318
1347
1406
1424
Run Average
R3SS3
R3SS4
R3SS5
R3SS6
R3SS7
R3SS8
R3SS9
R3SS10
1154
1213
1247
1251
1321
1342
1401
1419
Run Average
R4SS2
R4SS3
R4SS4
R4SS5
R4SS7
R4SS8
R4SS9
R4SS10
R4SS1 1
R4SS12
1117
1135
1556
1614
1647
1705
1723
1742
1801
1818
Run Average
CARBON FRACTIONS (ppm Propane)
C1-C7
(wet)
55.7
8.2
7.8
5.00
5.80
6
53.10
6.40
6.30
6.00
7.40
6.10
14.48
12.30
8
9.20
4.10
12.30
8.40
8.90
9.03
7.10
7.90
6.50
6.20
7.30
7.00
7.20
5.00
6.78
9.10
7.60
5.50
6.60
6.90
7.60
5.90
6.20
5.00
6.30
6.67
C1-C7
(dry)
69.54
10.24
9.74
6.24
7.24
7.49
66.29
7.99
7.87
7.49
9.24
7.62
18.08
15.39
10.01
11.51
5.13
15.39
10.51
11.14
11.30
8.59
9.55
7.86
7.50
8.83
8.46
8.71
6.05
8.19
11.30
9.44
6.83
8.20
8.57
9.44
7.33
7.70
6.21
7.83
8.29
C7-C17
(wet)
1.6
0.3
0.4
0.00
0.30
0.4
3.00
0.20
0.50
0.50
0.60
0.60
0.70
1.20
0.3
0.90
0.30
1.10
0.50
0.20
0.64
0.80
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.30
0.60
0.40
0.50
0.49
1.80
0.70
0.50
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.50
0.40
0.40
0.55
C7-C17
(dry)
2.00
0.37
0.50
0.00
0.37
0.50
3.75
0.25
0.62
0.62
0.75
0.75
0.87
1.50
0.38
1.13
0.38
1.38
0.63
0.25
0.80
0.97
0.60
0.48
0.48
0.36
0.73
0.48
0.60
0.59
2.24
0.87
0.62
0.50
0.25
0.37
0.37
0.62
0.50
0.50
0.68
>C17
(dry)
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.54
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.90
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
0.39
TOTAL
MASS
(ppm)
(dry)
71.93
11.00
10.63
6.63
8.01
8.38
70.43
8.63
8.88
8.50
10.38
8.75
19.35
17.44
10.93
13.18
6.05
17.31
11.68
11.93
12.64
10.45
11.06
9.24
8.88
10.09
10.09
10.09
7.55
9.68
13.93
10.70
7.84
9.09
9.21
10.20
8.09
8.71
7.10
8.71
9.36
B-86
-------
ORGANIC MASS DATA
RUN*
5
RUNTIME
(24-hour)
1130-1417
SAMP, f
R58SS2
R5BSS3
R5BSS4
R5BSS5
R5BSS6
R5BSS7
R5BSS8
R5BSS9
TIME
1146
1207
122S
1243
1307
1330
1352
1409
Run Average
CARBON FRACTIONS (ppnPropft/W)
C1-C7
(*«0
6.10
6.70
6.70
5.90
7.40
6.00
6.60
6.60
6.53
C1-C7
(dry)
7.54
128
a.28
7.29
9.15
7.42
6.16
6.41
6.07
C7-C17
(••0
0.70
0.60
0.50
020
0-20
0.60
0.40
0.50
0.45
C7-C17
(dry)
047
0,62
0.62
0.25
0.2S
0.74
0,49
0.62
0.56
>C17
(dry)
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50
TOTAL
MASS
(ppm)
(dry)
6.91
9.40
9.40
8.04
9.89
8.66
9.15
9.52
9.12
B-87
-------
ORGANIC MASS DATA
RUN*
Bypass Duct
1
2
3
4
RUN TIME
(24-hour)
1548-2012
1159-1440
1139-1431
1100-1147
1548-1825
SAMP. #
R1SS8
R1SS9
R1SS10
R1SS11
R1SS12
R1SS13
R1SS14
R1SS15
R1SS16
R1SS17
R1SS18
R1SS19
TIME
1557
1616
1645
1720
1739
1757
1815
1834
1852
1910
1930
2002
Run Average
R2SS2
R2SS3
R2SS4
R2SS5
R2SS6
R2SS7
R2SS8
1222
1241
1259
1318
1347
1406
1424
Run Average
R3SS3
R3SS4
R3SS5
R3SS6
R3SS7
R3SS8
R3SS9
R3SS10
1154
1213
1247
1251
1321
1342
1401
1419
Run Average
R4SS2
R4SS3
R4SS4
R4SS5
R4SS7
R4SS8
R4SS9
R4SS10
R4SS1 1
R4SS12
1117
1135
1556
1614
1647
1705
1723
1742
1801
1818
Run Average
CARBON FRACTIONS (ppm Propane)
C1-C7
(wet)
1.30
1.30
1.3
2.10
1.20
1.30
1.80
1.40
1.20
1.50
1.20
2.40
1.50
1.70
1.4
1.50
1.10
1.60
1.50
1.40
1.46
1.70
1.80
2.00
2.30
1.90
1.90
1.90
1.90
1.93
1.50
1.70
1.30
1.30
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.40
1.30
1.40
C1-C7
(dry)
1.41
1.41
1.62
2.62
1.30
1.41
2.25
1.75
1.50
1.62
1.30
2.60
1.73
1.86
1.75
1.64
1.20
1.75
1.64
1.53
1.63
1.84
1.95
2.17
2.49
2.06
2.06
2.06
2.06
2.09
1.62
1.84
1.40
1.40
1.51
1.51
1.51
•1.51
1.51
1.40
1.51
C7-C17
(wet)
0.40
0.20
0.1
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.17
0.00
0
0.00
0.60
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.20
0.00
0.10
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
C7-C17
(dry)
0.43
0.22
0.12
0.25
0.11
0.11
0.37
0.25
0.12
0.11
0.11
0.11
0.19
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.66
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.22
0.00
0.11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
>C17
(dry)
0.01
0.01
0.01
O.u1
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.44
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.42
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
TOTAL
MASS
(ppm)
(dry)
1.85
1.63
1.76
2.88
1.42
1.53
2.63
2.01
1.63
1.74
1.42
2.72
1.93
2.30
2.19
2.08
2.30
2.19
2.08
1.97
2.16
2.26
2.37
2.80
2.91
2.48
2.48
2.48
2.48
2.54
1.62
2.05
1.40
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.51
1.40
1.51
B-88
-------
ORGANIC MASS DATA
RUN*
5
RUN TIME
(24-tK>ur)
1130-1417
SAMP, t
R5BSS2
RSBSS3
R5BSS4
RSBSSS
R5BSS6
R58SS7
RSBSSS
RSBSS9
TIME
1148
1207
122S
1243
1307
1330
1352
1409
RunAwag*
CARBON FRACTIONS (ppm Propone)
C1-C7
2.00
.60
.70
.60
.70
.70
.80
.80
.72
C1-C7
(dry)
2.16
.73
.84
.73
.84
.84
.95
1.95
1.88
C7-C17
0.10
0.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
C7-C17
(dry)
0.11
0.22
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.05
>C17
(dry)
0.2«
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.26
0.26
0,26
TOTAL
MASS
(ppm)
(dry)
2.53
2.21
2.10
1.99
2. 10
2.10
2^1
2.21
2.17
8-89
-------
APPENDIX B-7
TOTAL HYDROCARBON AND
TOTAL ORGANIC MASS DATA3
a HC and organic mass data presented as dry, ppm propane
equivalent.
B-91
-------
RUN 1
TIME DECIMAL ORGANIC MASS
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1600
1601
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
TIME BYPASS MAIN
15.72
15.73
15.75
15.77
15.78
15.88
15.90
15.92
15.93
15.95 1.9 71.9
15.97
15.98
16.00
16.02
16.03
16.05
16.07
16.08
16.10
16.12
16.13
16.15
16.17
16.18
16.20
16.22
16.23
16.25
16.27 1.6 11.0
16.28
16.30
16.32
16.33
16.35
16.37
16.38
16.40
16.42
16.60
16.62
16.63
16.65
16.67
16.68
16.70
16.72
16.73
16.75 1.8 10.6
16.77
16.78
16.80
16.82
16.83
16.85
16.87
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
BYPASS DUCT MAIM DUCT
Cold Hot Cold Hot COMMENTS
(ppm) (ppn) (ppti) (ppm)
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
1.4
1.8
1.5
1.3
1.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
1.6
2.0
1.4
1.2
1.1
36.7
59.2
67.3
85.3
101.9
29.0
27.5
14.1
14.8
11.4
9.0
8.4
9.4
8.7
8.1
8.3
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.6
7.3
7.1
7.1
7.4
24.3
19.5
8.8
7.4
7.2
7.3
7.4
7.4
7.4
7.5
7.5
7.2
6.9
38.5 SAMPLING BEGUN
80.9
57.6
127.5
60.3
22.3
29.5
13.5
18.1
12.6
11.4
10.8
12.7
10.5
10.8
10.6
10.4
10.3
10.1
9.9
9.7
9.5
9.7
10.2
36.0
13.7
10.1
9.7
9.7
9.8
10.0
9.9
9.9
16.2
9.9
9.6
9.3
ZERO AND
0.6
0.0
-0.2
-0.2
-0.3
•0.3
-0.2
-0.2
•0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
•0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
0.0
-0.6
•0.7
-0.7
-0.8
•0.8
•0.7
-0.7
-0.7
-0.6
1.9
1.6
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
6.9
7.0
7.0
7.2
7.5
8.5
7.1
7.1
7.7
7.4
7.2
7.2
7.4
7.8
7.9
8.1
9.1
9.1
9.0
9.2
9.5
9.9
8.9
9.1
9.6
9.2
9.1
9.1
9.4
9.7
9.6
10.3
SPAN CHECK
B-93
-------
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
TIME DECIMAL
TIME
1653 16.88
1654 16.90
1655 16.92
1656 16.93
1657 16.95
1658 16.97
1659 16.98
1700 17.00
1701 17.02
1702 17.03
1703 17.05
1704 17.07
1705 17.08
1706 17.10
1707 17.12
1708 17.13
1709 17.15
1710 17.17
1711 17.18
1712 17.20
1713 17.22
1714 17.23
1715 17.25
1716 17.27
1717 17.16
1718 17.30
1719 17.32
1720 17.33
1721 17.35
1722 17.37
1723 17.38
1724 17.40
1725 17.42
1726 17.43
1727 17.45
1728 17.47
1729 17.48
1730 17.50
1731 17.52
1732 17.53
1733 17.55
1734 17.57
1735 17.58
1736 17.60
1737 17.62
1738 17.63
1739 17.65
1740 17.67
1741 17.68
1742 17.70
1743 17.72
1744 17.73
1745 17.75
1746 17.77
1747 17.78
1748 17.80
1749 17.82
1750 17.83
1751 17.85
1752 17.87
1753 17.88
1754 17.90
1755 17.92
1756 17.93
1757 17.95
BYPASS
ORCANIC MASS Cold
BYPASS MAIN (ppn)
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
-0.2
•0.2
•0.2
-0.2
2.9 6.6 -0.2
-0.2
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.2
1.4 7.9 -0.2
•0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.2
-0.3
-0.3
-0.2
-0.2
-0.3
•0.3
-0.3
-0.3
-0.3
1.5 8.4 -0.3
DUCT
Hot
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.7
3.3
2.7
2.1
1.6
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.8
0.7
1.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
MAIN
Cold
(PP»>
8.9
7.5
7.3
7.1
7.8
10.5
8.5
7.9
7.2
7.1
6.9
6.9
7.0
7.1
7.0
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.9
6.9
6.7
6.8
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.1
7.4
7.5
7.3
7.2
7.1
6.9
7.0
7.3
7.2
6.9
7.4
8.0
7.6
7.1
7.0
7.2
7.6
7.1
7.0
10.3
9.8
9.1
7.2
6.9
6.9
8.7
11.8
9.4
7.4
7.8
7.4
7.2
7.1
7.3
8.4
7,5
7.3
7.0
DUCT
Hot
-------
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
BYPASS DUCT MAIN DUCT
COMMENTS
TIME DECIMAL
ORGANIC MASS Cold
Hot
TIME BYPASS MAIN (ppm) (pp»)
1758
1759
1800
1801
1802
1803
1804
1805
1806
1807
1808
1809
1810
1811
1812
1813
18U
1815
1816
1817
1818
1819
1820
1821
1822
1823
1824
1825
1826
1827
1828
1829
1830
1831
1832
1833
1834
1835
1836
1837
1838
1839
1840
1841
1842
1843
1844
1845
1846
1847
1848
1849
1850
1851
1852
1853
1854
1855
1856
1857
1858
1859
1900
1901
1902
17.97
17.98
18.00
18.02
18.03
18.05
18.07
18.08
18.10
18.12
18.13
18.15
18.17
18.18
18.20
18.22
18.23
18.25
18.27
18.28
18.30
18.32
18.33
18.35
18.37
18.38
18.40
18.42
18.43
18.45
18.47
18.48
18.50
18.52
18.53
18.55
18.57
18.58
18.60
18.62
18.63
18.65
18.67
18.68
18.70
18.72
18.73
18.75
18.77
18.78
18.80
18.82
18.83
18.85
18.87
18.88
18.90
18.92
18.93
18.95
18.97
18.98
19.00
19.02
19.03
-0.3
23.0
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.8
3.9
8.6
5.0
2.7
1.8
1.4
1.0
0.9
2.6 70.4 0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
2.0 8.6 0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
1.6 8.9 0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
1.9
2.8
2.4
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
3.3
7.9
4.3
2.2
1.5
1.3
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
1.6
3.0
2.1
Cold
7.1
7.3
7.0
6.8
6.8
11.7
10.6
8.4
10.4
22.2
131.7
280.5
37.4
15.4
18.2
11.7
9.3
8.7
8.2
8.1
8.0
7.7
7.8
7.5
7.5
7.6
7.6
8.0
9.3
7.7
7.3
8.7
17.6
27.7
11.6
9.1
8.0
7.4
7.1
7.0
7.0
7.3
7.7
7.4
7.3
7.1
7.2
7.0
7.0
7.5
7.5
7.6
7.5
7.0
7.0
7.0
7.2
7.6
7.9
9.9
7.8
7.7
7.2
7.0
7.1
Hot i
8.8
8.9
8.6
8.5
8.6
14.2
10.7
9.8
12.2
28.9
149.2
173.7
26.6
15.1
20.1
11.7
10.7
10.3
9.7
9.7
9.6
9.3
9.3
9.1
9.2
9.1
9.2
9.8
10.4
9.2
8.9
10.5
21.6
23.7
11.8
10.5
9.5
9.2
8.8
8.8
8.8
9.1
9.5
9.1
9.1
9.0
9.0
8.8
8.9
9.3
9.2
9.4
9.1
8.7
8.8
8.8
9.1
9.4
10.0
11.1
9.5
9.3
9.1
8.9
9.1
B-95
-------
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
BYPASS DUCT MAIN DUCT
TINE DECIMAL ORGANIC MASS
TIME BYPASS MAIN
1903 19.05
1904 19.07
1905 19.08
1906 19.10
1907 19.12
1908 19.13
1909 19.15
1910 19.17 1.7 8.5
1911 19.18
1912 19.20
1913 19.22
1914 19.23
1915 19.25
1916 19.27
1917 19.28
1918 19.30
1919 19.32
1920 19.33
1921 19.35
1922 19.37
1923 19.38
1924 19.40
, 1925 19.42
1926 19.43
1927 19.45
1928 19.47
1929 19.48
1930 19.50 1.4 10.4
1931 19.52
1932 19.53
1933 19.55
1934 19.57
1935 19.58
1936 19.60
1937 19.62
1938 19.63
1939 19.65
1940 19.67
1941 19.68
1942 19.70
1943 19.72
1944 19.73
1945 19.75
1946 19.77
1947 19.78
1948 19.80
1949 19.82
1950 19.83
1951 19.85
1952 19.87
1953 19.88
1954 19.90
1955 19.92
1956 19.93
1957 19.95
1958 19.97
1959 19.98
2000 20.00
2001 20.02
2002 20.03 2.7 8.8
2003 20.05
2004 20.07
2005 20.08
2006 20.10
2007 20.12
Cold
(ppn)
2.0
1.6
1.4
1.4
1.2
1.1
1.0
0.9
1.0 ,
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
3.3
3.0
1.8
1.3
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
Hot
(ppm)
.7
.5
.3
.4
.3
.2
.1
.1
.2
.1
.0
.0
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
3.5
3.1
1.5
1.0
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
Cold
(ppm)
7.0
6.7
6.7
7.2
7.1
7.1
7.1
6.9
10.5
71.6
34.8
14.6
18.5
10.1
7.5
7.5
7.5
7.3
7.8
7.3
7.4
7.6
8.3
9.4
7.3
7.2
7.3
7.3
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.1
7.0
7.1
7.1
7.1
7.1
6.8
6.9
7.2
7.2
7.0
7.3
9.1
7.5
7.1
7.4
7.3
7.3
6.9
6.8
7.0
7.1
7.2
7.3
7.0
7.0
7.1
7.0
7.0
7.1
7.1
6.8
Hot
-------
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
BYPASS DUCT MAIN DUCT
TIME DECIMAL ORGANIC MASS Cold Hot Cold Hot COMMENTS
TIME BYPASS MAIN (ppra) (ppm) (ppm) (ppn)
2008 20.13 0.6 0.6 6.9 8.9
2009 20.15 0.6 0.6 7.0 9.0
2010 20.17 0.6 0.7 7.4 9.4
2011 20.18 0.6 0.7 7.3 9.1
2012 20.20 0.6 0.7 7.2 9.1 SAMPLING ENDED
B-97
-------
RUN1, BYPASS DUCT
HOTTHC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
«
c
co
0.
2
C-<
E
a,
a.
^-s
Z
0
H
CONCENTR
C(
I
s
cu
E
0,
A
0
H
CONCENTf
7
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1
-
-
: +t 1
^"•xJ
. u
15 16
_ HOT THC
>LD
25
20
15
10
0
-5
h-
Kj\J"X
i
+
LJ
If
y
17 18 19 20 21
24-HOUR TIME
+ ORGANIC MASS
RUN 1 , BYPASS DUCT
THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
+ + .
1
1 * ^
*+ IT
15 16 17 18 19
24-HOUR TIME
20
21
_COLDTHC
ORGANIC MASS
B-98
-------
RUN1, MAIN DUCT
HOTTHC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
o.
a
e150
O-
£?
O 100
50
1
-4-
15
16
17 18 19
24-HOUR TIME
HOTTHC + ORGANIC MASS
20
21
RUN 1, MAIN DUCT
COLD THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
C
eg
2*250
DM
| 200
Z
O 150
| 100
8- 50
z
8 o
4.,
15 16
_ COLD THC
17 18
24-HOUR TIME
+ ORGANIC MASS
20
21
B-99
-------
RUN 2
ORGANIC MASS 1
JYP/
TIME DECIMAL BYPASS MAIN COLD
TIME (dry) (dry) (ppm)
1159
1200
1201
1202
1203
1204
1205
1206
1207
1208
1209
1210
1211
1212
1213
1214
1215
1216
1217
1218
1219
1220
1221
1222
1223
1224
1225
1226
1227
1228
1229
1230
1231
1232
1233
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1300
1301
11
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
.98
.00
.02
.03
.05
.07
1. 9
1. 8
1. 7
1. 7
1.8
1.9
.08 2.6
.10 4.1
.12 4.1
.13 3.0
.15 2.6
.17 2.3
.18 2.1
.20 2.0
.22
.23
.25
.27
.28
.30
.32
.33
.35
.37 2.3 17.44
.38
.40
.42
.43
.45
.47
.48
.9
.9
.9
.8
.7
.7
.7
.6
.6
.5
.5
.6
.6
.7
.6
.5
.5
.50 3.3
.52 2.1
.53
.55
12.57
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
13
13
.58
.60
.62
.63
.65
.67
.68 2.19 10.93
.70
.72
.73
.75
.77
.78
.80
.82
.83
.85
.87
.88
.90
.92
.93
.95
.97
.98 2.08 13.18
1.9
1.5
1.5
.6
.6
.6
.5
.5
.4
.4
.5
.7
.5
.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
.4
1.4
.4
.4
.5
.5
.5
1.4
.4
.4
.9
.00 3.2
.02 2.7
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
MAIM
HOT COLD HOT
(ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
COMMENTS
1.9
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.6
4.1
4.1
3.0
2.6
2.3
2.1
2.0
.9
.9
.9
.8
.7
.7
.7
.6
.6
.5
.5
.6
.6
.7
.6
.5
.5
3.3
2.1
1.9
1.5
1.5
.6
.6
.6
.5
.5
.4
.4
.5
.7
.5
.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.9
3.2
2.7
0.0
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.2
-0.2
0.1
1.7
2.5
1.3
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.3
0.2
0.1
1.8
0.9
0.4
0.0
-0.
-0.
0.0
•0.
-0.
-0.
-0.
-0.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.2
2.3
1.3
11.8
18.9
11.6
10.3
9.9
9.5
39.8
36.7
31.6
16.4
15.8
20.6
11.5
9.0
9.2
9.2
9.2
11.7
9.2
8.7
8.7
8.7
9.1
9.7
9.5
9.5
9.7
12.2
10.8
9.5
9.0
19.8
32.5
13.3
10.8
9.1
12.7
23.3
12.6
9.8
9.4
10.6
9.3
9.7
10.3
9.7
9.1
11.4
9.5
8.9
9.3
28.6
15.4
9.7
9.2
9.2
9.0
9.1
9.4
9.7
9.2
9.1
10.5
15.8 SAMPLING BEGUN
19.5
13.6
12.6
12.5
12.0
49.7
25.3
32.0
15.4
19.4
20.0
12.5
11.5
11.8
11.7
11.9
13.9
11.2
11.1
11.2
11.0
11.4
11.9
11.4
11.5
11.7
14.2
12.2
11.2
10.8
22.4
29.4
14.4
12.1
10.9
14.6
23.7
13.7
11.6
11.4
12.4
11.1
11.6
12.2
11.4
11.0
13.2
11.1
10.8
11.2
29.7
14.5
11.4
11.1
11.1
10.8
11.0
11.1
11.2
10.7
10.7
12.1
B-100
-------
TIME DECIMAL
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
TIME
13.03
13.05
13.07
13.08
13.10
13.12
13.13
13.15
13.17
13.18
13.20
13.22
13.23
13.25
13.27
13.28
13.30
13.32
13.33
13.35
13.37
13.38
13.40
13.42
13.43
13.45
13.62
13.63
13.65
13.67
13.68
13.70
13.72
13.73
13.75
13.77
13.78
13.80
13.82
13.83
13.85
13.87
13.88
13.90
13.92
13.93
13.95
13.97
13.98
14.00
14.02
14.03
14.05
14.07
ORGANIC MASS
BYPASS MAIN
(dry) (dry)
2.3 6.05
2.19 17.31
TNC CONCENTRATION (dry)
BYPASS MAIN
COLD HOT COLD HOT
(ppn) (ppm) (ppn) (ppn)
COMMENTS
2.3
2.1
2.1
2.0
2.0
1.9
.9
.9
.8
.7
.9
.7
.6
.5
.5
.5
.6
.6
.8
.6
.5
.5
.5
.5
1.7
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.4
9.8
9.2
8.9
9.1
10.1
10.3
9.1
9.1
9.1
9.2
9.2
9.9
8.9
9.0
8.9
9.2
9.3
9.1
9.1
9.2
13.9
10.6
9.1
12.0
15.4
11.3
10.8
10.6
10.7
11.9
11.7
10.9
10.9
10.9
11.0
11.0
11.5
10.6
10.7
10.6
10.9
11.0
10.8
10.8
10.7
15.1
11.9
10.6
13.5
16.6
ZERO AND
1.4
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.7
4.6
7.4
4.6
3.0
2.1
1.8
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
3.4
7.5
4.0
2.2
.3
.1
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
0.9
0.9
0.8
13.0
12.3
15.2
11.1
10.3
9.4
10.8
10.7
10.2
10.0
9.8
9.6
19.6
18.9
11.4
9.5
9.6
10.3
12.0
9.9
9.9
9.2
9.7
9.5
9.4
9.5
9.6
13.7
13.6
15.5
12.4
11.9
11.1
12.6
12.2
12.0
11.8
11.6
11.5
21.5
18.1
12.9
11.2
11.5
12.1
13.7
11.6
11.7
11.1
11.5
11.3
11.0
11.0
11.2
SPAN CHECK
B-101
-------
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
ORGANIC MASS BYPASS HAIN
TIME DECIMAL BYPASS MAIN COLD HOT COLO HOT COMMENTS
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1431
1432
1433
1434
1435
1436
1437
1438
1439
1440
TIME (dry) (dry) (ppro)
14.08 1.4
14.10 2.08 11.68 1.4
14.12 1.4
14.13 1.5
14.15 1.5
14.17 1.4
14.18 1.4
14.20
14.22
14.23
14.25
14.27
14.28
14.30
14.32
14.33
14.35
14.37
14.38
14.40 1.97 11.93
14.42
14.43
14.45
14.47
14.48
14.50
14.52
14.53
.4
.4
.4
.4
.5
.5
.5
.5
.7
.6
.5
.6
.5
.5
.5
.5
.5
.7
.5
.4
.4
14.55 1.4
14.57 1.4
14.58 1.4
14.60 1.4
14.62 1.4
14.63 1.4
14.65 1.4
14.67 2.4
CppnO
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
1.0
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
1.4
(ppnt)
9.7
9.2
9.4
11.4
9.8
12.2
10.8
11.3
11.0
9.3
9.3
14.0
10.9
11.3
14.1
16.0
14.4
10.1
10.0
10.3
10.9
10.4
10.4
9.9
26.6
18.3
13.6
11.3
16.5
10.6
9.7
10.2
10.9
9.5
9.7
9.5
-------
RUN 2, BYPASS DUCT
COLD THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
C. 7
a 7
cu
E 6
B.
C.
2 5
O
i4
03
02
O
U 1
12 12.5 13 13.5 14
24-HOUR TIME
14.5
15
_ COLD THC
ORGANIC MASS
RUN 2, BYPASS DUCT
HOT THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
O
c
J3
CU
O
Qu
E
d.
c.
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
S i
u
z
8-!
0
12
12.5
_ HOT THC
13 13.5 14 14.5 15
24-HOUR TIME
. TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
B-103
-------
RUN 2, MAIN DUCT
COLD THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
I 40
a 30
§25
B§ 2°
2 15
tU
£ 10
8 5
12
12.5
_ COLD THC
13 13.5 14 14.5
24-HOUR TIME
+ TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
15
RUN 2, MAIN DUCT
HOT THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
c
03
" 50
Z
O
I
z
u
8
40
30
20
10
0
12
12.5
_HOTTHC
13 13.5 14 14.5 15
24-HOUR TIME
. TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
B-104
-------
RUN 3
TIME DECIMAL
TIME
1139 11.65
1UO 11.67
1141 11.68
1142 11.70
1143 11.72
1144 11.73
1145 11.75
1146 11.77
1147 11.78
1148 11.80
1149 11.82
1150 11.83
1151 11.85
1152 11.87
1153 11.88
1154 11.90
1155 11.92
1156 11.93
1157 11.95
1158 11.97
1159 11.98
1200 12.00
1201 12.02
1202 12.03
1203 12.05
1204 12.07
1205 12.08
1206 12.10
1207 12.12
1208 12.13
1209 12.15
1210 12.17
1211 12.18
1212 12.20
1213 12.22
1214 12.23
1215 12.25
1216 12.27
1217 12.28
1218 12.30
1219 12.32
1220 12.33
1221 12.35
1222 12.37
1223 12.38
1224 12.40
1225 12.42
1226 12.43
1227 12.45
1228 12.47
1229 12.48
1230 12.50
1231 12.52
1232 12.53
1233 12.55
1234 12.57
1235 12.58
1236 12.60
1237 12.62
1238 12.63
1239 12.65
1240 12.67
1241 12.68
1242 12.70
ORGANIC MASS
BYPASS MAIN
(dry) (dry)
2.26 10.45
2.37 11.06
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
BYPASS MAIN
COLD HOT COLD HOT
(ppn) (ppm) (ppn) (ppm)
COMMENTS
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
.2
.1
.1
.1
.1
1.1
1.1
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.
1.
1.2
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
7.6
7.6
7.1
7.7
8.5
7.4
7.1
7.2
7.2
8.4
7.1
7
6.9
7
7
6.7
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.9
7.1
7.2
7.1
7.1
7.1
7
6.9
7.2
7.3
7
7
7
7
7
7
7
6.9
6.9
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.9
6.8
7
9.1
9.8
7.2
7
7
7
7
6.9
7.1
7.2
7.4
7.3
7.3
7.2
7.2
9.2 SAMPLING BEGUN
8.5
8.4
9.4
9.1
8.5
8.2
8.2
8.7
8.6
7.9
8
7.9
8
7.9
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.9
8.1
8.1
8.1
8
7.8
7.8
7.7
8
7.9
7.8
7.7
7.8
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.8
7.8
7.7
7.7
7.8
11.2
8.3
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.6
7.7
7.8
7.9
7.9
7.9
7.8
7.7
7.8
B-105
-------
TIME DECIMAL
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
TIME
12.72
12.73
12.75
12.77
12.78
12.80
12.82
12.83
12.85
12.87
12.88
12.90
12.92
12.93
12.95
12.97
12.98
13.00
13.02
13.03
13.05
13.07
13.32
13.33
13.35
13.37
13.38
13.40
13.42
13.43
13.45
13.47
13.48
13.50
13.52
13.53
13.55
13.57
13.58
13.60
13.62
13.63
13.65
13.67
13.68
13.70
13.72
13.73
13.75
13.77
ORGANIC MASS
BYPASS MAIM
(dry) (dry)
2.8 9.24
2.91 8.88
2.48 10.09
2.48 10.09
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
BYPASS MAIN
COLD HOT COLD HOT
-------
ORGANIC MASS
TIME DECIMAL BYPASS MAIN
TIME (dry) (dry)
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
1418
1419
1420
1421
1422
1423
1424
1425
1426
1427
1428
1429
1430
1451
13.78
13.80
13.82
13.83
13.85
13.87
13.88
13.90
13.92
13.93
13.95
13.97
13.98
14.00
14.02
14.03
14.05
14.07
14.08
14.10
14.12
14.13
14.15
14.17
14.18
14.20
14.22
14.23
14.25
14.27
14.28
14.30
14.32
14.33
14.35
14.37
14.38
14.40
14.42
14.43
14.45
14.47
14.48
14.50
14.52
2.48
10.09
2.48
7.55
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
BYPASS MAIM
COLD HOT COLD HOT
CppnO (pprn) (ppn) (pprn)
COMMENTS
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
6.1
6.1
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.1
6.1
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.2
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.1
6.2
6.1
6.1
8.7
6.6
6.2
6.2
6.3
6.3
6.2
6.1
7.1
7.5
6.4
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.3
6.2
6.1
6.6
6.9
6.4
6.3
6.4
6.4
6.3
6.3
6.3
8.2
8.3
8.3
8.6
8.8
9
8.9
8.7
8.6
8
7.3
6.9
6.8
6.6
6.5
6.3
6.5
6.8
7.1
9.3
7.6
7.5
7.6
7.7
7.7
7.8
7.8
9.2
8.8
7.9
8.2
8.1
8.1
8.1
8
7.8
8.3
8.6
8
8
8
8
8
8.3
8.9 SAMPLING ENDED
B-107
-------
RUN 3, BYPASS DUCT
COLD THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
u •
a
C.
S 3
c
a2-5
2
0 2
P
B: 1.5
P
2
M
— -i
U 1
2
O
U 0.5
+
+
-
_
Ann A
11
_ COLD THC
12 13 14
24-HOUR TIME
15
TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
RUN 3, BYPASS DUCT
HOT THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
^3.5
S- 3
o ->
Ou
E 2.5
Ou
Q.
O
1.5
2 °'5
8 o
11
_HOTTHC
12 13 14
24-HOUR TIME
+ TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
15
B-108
-------
RUN 3, MAIN DUCT
COLD THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
?12
a
| 11
(L,
| 10
a.
2 9
O
H 8
UJ
0 6
8 5
1-1
_ COLD THC
12 13
24-HOUR TIME
14 15
+ TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
RUN 3, MAIN DUCT
HOT THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
c
a
c.
0.
N»^
O
PS
§
U
8
12
11
10
9
8
7
11
_HOTTHC
12 13 14
24-HOUR TIME
+ TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
15
B-109
-------
RUN 4
ORGANIC MASS
TIME DECIMAL BYPASS MAIN
TIME (dry) (dry)
1100
1101
1102
1103
1104
1105
1106
1107
1108
1109
1110
1111
1112
1113
1114
1115
1116
1117
1118
1119
1120
1121
1122
1123
1124
1125
1126
1127
1128
1129
1130
1131
1132
1133
1134
1135
1136
1137
1138
1139
1140
1141
1142
1143
1144
1145
1146
1147
1148
1547
1548
1549
1550
1551
1552
1553
1554
1555
1556
1557
1558
1559
1600
1601
11.00
11.02
11.03
11.05
11.07
11.08
11.10
11.12
11.13
11.15
11.17
11.18
11.20
11.22
11.23
11.25
11.27
11.28
11.30
11.32
11.33
11.35
11.37
11.38
11.40
11.42
11.43
11.45
11.47
11.48
11.50
11.52
11.53
11.55
11.57
11.58
11.60
11.62
11.63
11.65
11.67
11.68
11.70
11.72
11.73
11.75
11.77
11.78
11.80
15.78
15.80
15.82
15.83
15.85
15.87
15.88
15.90
15.92
15.93
15.95
15.97
15.98
16.00
16.02
1.6
13.9
2.1
10.7
1.4
7.8
THC
CONCENTRATION (dry)
BYPASS
COLO
-------
ORGANIC MASS
TIME DECIMAL BYPASS MAIN
TIME (dry)
1602
1603
1604
1605
1606
1607
1608
1609
1610
1611
1612
1613
1614
1615
1616
1617
1618
1619
1620
1621
1622
1623
1624
1625
1626
1627
1628
1629
1630
1631
1632
1633
1634
1635
1636
1637
1638
1639
1640
1641
1642
1643
1644
1645
1646
1647
1648
1649
1650
1651
1652
1653
1654
1655
1656
1657
1658
1659
1700
1701
1702
1703
1704
1705
16.03
16.05
16.07
16.08
16.10
16.12
16.13
16.15
16.17
16.18
16.20
16.22
16.23
16.25
16.27
16.28
16.30
16.32
16.33
16.35
16.37
16.38
16.40
16.65
16.67
16.68
16.70
16.72
16.73
16.75
16.77
16.78
16.80
16.82
16.83
16.85
16.87
16.88
16.90
16.92
16.93
16.95
16.97
16.98
17.00
17.02
17.03
17.05
17.07
17.08
1.5
9.1
1.5
9.2
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
BYPASS MAIN
COLO HOT COLD
(ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
COMMENTS
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
7.1
7.3
7.3
7.1
6.6
6.5
6.8
7.2
7.0
6.6
6.4
6.8
7.1
7.1
6.7
6.9
7.0
7.0
6.8
7.0
6.8
7.2
9.2
9.5
9.4
9.2
8.6
8.6
9.0
9.4
9.1
8.6
8.6
9.1
9.1
9.0
8.6
8.9
9.1
9.0
8.8
9.0
8.8
9.2
ZERO AND
SPAN CHECK
1.5
10.2
0.?
o.c
O.f
0.(
O.I
O.I
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
O.I
O.I
O.I
0.
O.I
>
> 1.6
» 1.3
1 1.1
1 1.C
» O.f
0.£
O.I
o.t
o.t
0.!
0.!
0.4
o.:
o.:
o.;
o.;
0.
0.
0.
0.
3 0.
3 0.
S -0.
J -0.
3 -0.
6.9 1C
6.9
6.9
7.1
7.1
> 6.9
1 7.0
t 6.9
> 6.9
> 7.0
> 6.9
i 6.9
> 6.8
1 6.8
1 7.0
> 6.9
! 6.7
6.7
7.1
6.9
6.6
) 6.5
) 6.6
6.7
6.6
6.6
.8
.7
.5
.6
.5
.2
.5
.3
.4
.5
.4
.4
.4
.3
.6
.5
.3
.4
.9
.7
.4
.5
.3
.5
.3
.4
B-lll
-------
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
ORGANIC MASS BYPASS MAIN
TIME DECIMAL BYPASS MAIN COLO HOT COLP COMMENTS
TIME (dry) (dry) (ppn) (ppn) (ppm) (ppn)
1706 17.10 0.8 -0.1 6.8 8.7
1707 17.12 0.8 -0.1 6.5 8;3
1708 17.13 0.8 -0.1 6.5 8.4
1709 17.15 0.7 -0.1 6.6 8.6
1710 17.17 0.8 -0.2 6.5 8.4
1711 17.18 0.7 -0.2 6.5 8.5
1712 17.20 0.7 -0.2 6.4 8.3
1713 17.22 0.7 -0.2 6.6 8.6
1714 17.23 0.7 -0.2 6.5 8.5
1715 17.25 0.7 -0.3 6.3 8.2
1716 17.27 0.7 -0.3 6.4 8.6
1717 17.28 0.7 -0.3 6.2 8.3
1718 17.30 0.7 -0.3 6.2 8.3
1719 17.32 0.7 -0.4 6.3 8.4
1720 17.33 0.7 -0.4 6.2 8.2
1721 17.35 0.7 -0.4 6.1 8.1
1722 17.37 0.7 -0.4 6.1 8.2
1723 17.38 1.5 8.1 0.7 -0.4 5.9 8.0
1724 17.40 0.7 -0.4 6.0 8.1
1725 17.42 0.7 -0.4 6.1 8.3
1726 17.43 0.7 -0.4 6.0 8.1
1727 17.45 0.6 -0.4 6.1 8.3
1728 17.47 0.6 -0.4 5.9 8.0
1729 17.48 0.6 -0.4 6.2 8.4
1730 17.50 0.6 -0.5 5.9 8.0
1731 17.52 0.6 -0.5 6.0 8.2
1732 17.53 0.6 -0.5 5.9 8.1
1733 17.55 0.6 -0.5 6.0 8.3
1734 17.57 0.6 -0.5 5.8 8.1
1735 17.58 0.6 -0.4 5.7 8.0
1736 17.60 0.6 -0.4 5.8 8.2
1737 17.62 0.6 -0.4 5.7 7.6
1738 17.63 0.6 -0.4 5.9 8.0
1739 17.65 0.6 -0.4 5.7 7.7
1740 17.67 0.6 -0.4 6.0 8.0
1741 17.68 0.6 -0.4 5.8 7.8
1742 17.70 1.5 8.7 0.6 -0.4 5.8 7.8
1743 17.72 0.6 -0.3 6.3 8.3
1744 17.73 0.6 -0.3 6.2 8.1
1745 17.75 0.6 -0.3 6.1 7.9
1746 17.77 0.6 -0.3 6.2 8.1
1747 17.78 0.6 -0.3 6.5 8.4
1748 17.80 0.6 -0.3 6.4 8.2
1749 17.82 0.6 -0.3 6.3 8.0
1750 17.83 0.5 -0.3 6.5 8.3
1751 17.85 0.5 -0.3 6.5 8.2
1752 17.87 0.6 -0.3 6.2 7.8
1753 17.88 0.6 -0.3 6.3 8.0
1754 17.90 0.6 -0.3 6.3 8.0
1755 17.92 0.6 -0.3 6.2 7.7
1756 17.93 0.5 -0.3 6.2 7.9
1757 17.95 0.5 -0.3 6.0 7.6
1758 17.97 0.5 -0.3 6.1 7.8
1759 17.98 0.5 -0.3 6.1 7.8
1800 18.00 0.6 -0.3 6.1 7.9
1801 18.02 1.5 7.1 0.6 -0.3 5.8 7.5
1802 18.03 0.6 -0.2 5.9 7.7
1803 18.05 0.6 -0.2 6.0 7.7
1804 18.07 0.6 -0.2 5.8 7.4
1805 18.08 0.6 -0.2 6.0 7.7
1806 18.10 0.6 -0.2 6.0 7.8
1807 18.12 0.6 -0.2 5.9 7.6
1808 18.13 0.6 -0.2 6.2 8.0
1809 18.15 0.6 -0.2 6.1 7.8
B-112
-------
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
ORGANIC MASS BYPASS MAIN
TIME DECIMAL BYPASS MAIN COLD HOT COLO COMMENTS
TIME (dry) (dry) Cppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
1810 18.17 0.6 -0.2 5.9 7.5
1811 18.18 0.6 -0.2 6.0 7.7
1812 18.20 0.6 -0.2 6.2 8.0
1813 18.22 0.6 -0.2 6.0 7.7
1814 18.23 0.6 -0.2 6.0 7.6
1815 18.25 0.6 -0.2 6.2 7.9 '
1816 18.27 0.6 -0.2 6.2 7.8
1817 18.28 0.6 -0.2 5.9 7.5
1818 18.30 1.4 8.7 0.6 -0.2 6.0 7.7
1819 18.32 0.6 -0.2 6.0 7.6
1820 18.33 0.6 -0.2 5.8 7.4
1821 18.35 0.6 -0.2 5.9 7.4
1822 18.37 0.6 -0.2 5.9 7.5
1823 18.38 0.6 -0.2 6.0 7.6
1824 18.40 0.6 -0.2 5.8 7.4
1825 18.42 0.6 -0.2 6.0 7.6 SAMPLING ENDED
B-113
-------
RUN 4, BYPASS DUCT
COLD THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
c
C3
2 2.5
Pu
I 2
I 0.5
8 0
11
12
13 14 15 16
24-HOUR TIME
17
18
19
_ COLD THC
TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
RUN 4, BYPASS DUCT
HOT THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
OH
E 1.5
a.
g '
H 0.5
0
n
11 12
.HOTTHC
17
18 19
13 14 15 16
24-HOUR TIME
. TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
B-114
-------
RUN 4, MAIN DUCT
COLD THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
15
a 14.
c. x^
2 13
O 10
2
LU
u
2
O
U
11
12
13 14 15 16
24-HOUR TIME
17
18
19
_ COLD THC
TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
RUN 4, MAIN DUCT
HOT THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
^ 15
v J-J
S.14
o
£ 13
I12
Z 11
o
£ 10
9
8
7
6
H
UQ
^
11
12
13 14 15 16 17
24-HOUR TIME
18
19
_HOTTHC
TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
B-115
-------
RUN 5
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
ORGANIC MASS BYPASS HAIN
TIME DEC I HAL BYPASS MAIN COLO HOT COLO HOT COMMENTS
TIME (dry) (dry) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
1130 11.50 0.7 0.5 6.2 7.6 TEST BEGUN
1131 11.52 0.8 0.5 6.1 7.7
1132 11.53 0.8 0.5 6.4 8.0
1133 11.55 0.7 0.5 6.2 7.6
1134 11.57 0.8 0.5 6.2 7.6
1135 11.58 0.8 0.5 6.3 7.9
1136 11.60 0.7 0.5 6.5 8.0
1137 11.62 0.8 0.5 6.4 7.8
1138 11.63 0.8 0.5 6.0 7.5
1139 11.65 0.8 0.5 6.2 8.1
1140 11.67 0.8 0.5 6.3 8.1
1141 11.68 0.8 0.6 6.1 7.6
1142 11.70 0.8 0.7 6.2 7.4
1143 11.72 0.7 0.5 6.7 7.7
1144 11.73 0.7 0.5 6.8 7.7
1145 11.75 0.7 0.5 6.4 7.4
1146 11.77 0.7 0.5 6.4 7.6
1147 11.78 0.8 0.6 6.6 7.9
1148 11.80 2.5 8.9 0.8 0.6 6.3 7.6
1149 11.82 O.B 0.6 6.2 7.7
1150 11.83 O.B 0.6 6.5 8.0
1151 11.85 0.8 0.6 6.4 7.8
1152 11.87 0.8 0.6 6.5 7.9
1153 11.88 O.B 0.6 6.6 8.1
1154 11.90 0.8 0.6 6.4 7.9
1155 11.92 0.7 0,6 6.6 8.1
1156 11.93 0.7 0.6 6.5 7.8
1157 11.95 0.7 0.6 6.6 8.1
1158 11.97 0.7 0.6 6.6 7.9
1159 11.98 0.7 0.6 6.6 8.1
1200 12.00 0.7 0.6 6.7 7.9
1201 12.02 0.7 0.6 6.6 7.5
1202 12.03 0.7 0.6 6.5 7.6
1203 12.05 0.7 0.6 6.5 7.7
1204 12.07 0.7 0.6 6.6 8.0
1205 12.08 0.7 0.6 6.5 7.7
1206 12.10 0.7 0.6 6.4 7.8
1207 12.12 2.2 9.4 0.8 0.6 6.6 8.0
1208 12.13 0.8 0.6 6.4 7.6
1209 12.15 0.8 0.6 6.2 7.4
1210 12.17 0.7 0.5 6.4 7.7
1211 12.18 0.8 0.6 6.5 7.8
1212 12.20 0.8 0.6 6.3 7.5
1213 12.22 0.8 0.6 6.3 7.6
1214 12.23 0.8 0.6 6.6 8.1
1215 12.25 0.8 0.5 6.7 8.1
1216 12.27 O.B 0.5 6.4 7.8
1217 12.28 O.B 0.6 6.1 7.5
1218 12.30 O.B 0.6 6.2 7.6
1219 12.32 O.B 0.5 6.3 7.5
1220 12.33 0.8 0.5 6.2 7.3
1221 12.35 0.8 0.5 6.3 7.5
1222 12.37 0.8 0.5 6.4 7.6
1223 12.38 0.8 0.6 6.2 7.5
1224 12.40 0.8 0.5 6.5 7.9
1225 12.42 2.1 9.4 0.8 0.6 6.5 7.8
1226 12.43 0.8 0.5 6.5 7.7
1227 12.45 O.B 0.5 6.5 7.7
1228 12.47 O.B 0.6 6.5 7.7
1229 12.48 O.B 0.5 6.7 8.0
1230 12.50 0.8 0.6 6.6 7.7
1231 12.52 0.8 0.6 6.6 7.9
1232 12.53 0.7 0.6 6.6 7.7
1233 12.55 0.7 0.6 6.7 7.9
B-116
-------
ORGANIC MASS
TIME DECIMAL BYPASS MAIN
TIME (dry) (dry)
1234
1235
1236
1237
1238
1239
1240
1241
1242
1243
1244
1245
1246
1247
1248
1249
1250
1251
1252
1253
1254
1255
1256
1257
1258
1259
1300
1301
1302
1303
1304
1305
1306
1307
1308
1309
1310
1311
1312
1313
1314
1315
1316
1317
1318
1319
1320
1321
1322
1323
1324
1325
1326
1327
1328
1329
1330
1331
1332
1333
1334
1335
1336
1337
12.57
12.58
12.60
12.62
12.63
12.65
12.67
12.68
12.70
12.72
12.73
12.75
12.77
12.78
12.80
12.82
12.83
12.85
12.87
12.88
12.90
13.13
13.15
13.17
13.18
13.20
13.22
13.23
13.25
13.27
13.28
13.30
13.32
13.33
13.35
13.37
13.38
13.40
13.42
13.43
13.45
13.47
13.48
13.50
13.52
13.53
13.55
13.57
13.58
13.60
13.62
2.0
8.0
2.1
9.9
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
BYPASS MAIN
COLO HOT COLD HOT
(ppn) (ppn) (ppn) (ppm)
COMMENTS
2.1
8.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.3
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
6.7
6.6
6.6
6.5
6.5
6.5
6.3
6.3
6.2
6.5
6.4
6.2
6.2
6.4
6.2
6.3
6.7
6.3
6.2
7.7
7.7
7.7
7.5
7.7
7.5
7.3
7.4
7.4
7.8
7.6
7.3
7.4
7.6
7.3
7.4
7.8
7.4
7.4
ZERO AND
SPAN CHECK
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
o.t
O.t
O.t
O.t
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
O.I
6.2
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.4
' 6.5
' 6.4
' 6.3
> 6.4
> 6.4
i 6.5
i 6.4
6.5
6.3
6.5
6.3
6.1
6.3
6.1
6.4
6.1
6.0
6.3
6.3
6.1
6.3
6.5
6.1
T 6.2
5 6.5
7.7
8.1
8.0
8.2
8.0
8.2
8.0
7.8
7.9
8.0
8.0
7.8
8.0
7.7
8.1
7.8
7.6
7.9
7.7
8.1
7.7
7.7
8.1
7.9
7.7
8.1
8.2
7.6
7.9
8.1
B-117
-------
ORGANIC MASS
TIME DECIMAL BYPASS MAIN
1338
1339
1340
1341
1342
1343
1344
1345
1346
1347
1348
1349
1350
1351
1352
1353
1354
1355
1356
1357
1358
1359
1400
1401
1402
1403
1404
1405
1406
1407
1408
1409
1410
1411
1412
1413
1414
1415
1416
1417
TIME (dry) (dry)
13.63
13.65
13.67
13.68
13.70
13.72
13.73
13.75
13.77
13.78
13.80
13.82
13.83
13.85
13.87 2.2 9.;
13.88
13.90
13.92
13.93
13.95
13.97
13.98
14.00
14.02
14.03
14.05
14.07
14.08
14.10
14.12
U.13
14.15 2.2 9.'
14.17
14.18
14.20
14.22
14.23
14.25
14.27
14.28
THC CONCENTRATION (dry)
BYPASS MAIN
LO
n)
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
HOT
(PPOI)
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.6
0.7
0.6
0.7
0.7
0.7
0.7
COLD
(PPn>
6.4
6.1
6.4
6.6
6.1
6.3
6.5
6.9
6.6
6.4
6.4
6.4
6.2
6.4
6.3
6.6
6.5
6.3
6.6
6.5
6.4
6.4
6.3
6.8
6.8
6.4
6.2
6.6
6.4
6.3
6.5
6.4
6.2
6.5
6.6
6.2
6.5
6.4
6.5
6.8
HOT COMMENTS
(ppm)
7.8
7.5
8.0
8.1
7.5
7.9
8.0
8.2
8.1
7.8
7.9
8.0
7.8
8.1
7.9
8.3
8.0
7.8
8.1
7.9
7.8
7.8
7.8
8.3
8.4
7.9
7.7
8.2
7.9
7.7
8.1
7.9
7.7
8.2
8.1
7.6
8.0
7.4
7.6
8.0 SAMPLING ENDED
B-118
-------
RUN 5, BYPASS DUCT
COLD THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
U
§2.5
0_
12
Z
O 1.5
H
pi l
_- -, AjW\_
g 0.5 -
8 0
12 13 14 15
24-HOUR TIME
_ COLD THC + TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
RUN 5, BYPASS DUCT
HOT THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
• 3
-------
RUN 5, MAIN DUCT
COLD THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
C3
I" 10
c-
8
§ «
8 5
11
_ COLD THC
12 13 14
24-HOUR TIME
u TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
15
RUN 5, MAIN DUCT
HOT THC CONCENTRATION AND TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
u
ta
c.
a
c,
Q.
Z
o
Di
H
2
PJ
U
z
8
10.5
10
9.5
9
8.5
8
7.5
7
6.5
11
_HOTTHC
12 13
24-HOUR TIME
14 15
+ TOTAL ORGANIC MASS
B-120
-------
APPENDIX B-8
HC1 DATA
B-121
-------
NOTE: All leak checks of the HC1 sample trains were passed with the exception
of the final leak check for test Run 2 at the main duct. It 1s believed that
the train's 1mp1nger connections were loosened as the train was removed from
the duct at the conclusion of the test.
HCI TRAIN SAMPLING TIMES
SAMPLE PERIOD
MAIN DUCT
1
2
3
4
BYPASS DUCT
1
2
3
4
24-HOUR TIME
RUN*1
1715-1745
1810-1840
1900-1930
1940-2010
1549-1619
1730-1800
1900- 1930
1941 -2011
RUN #2
1200-1730
1246-1316
1329-1359
1408-1438
1159-1229
1249-1319
1323-1353
1410-1440
RUN #3
1142-1212
1230-1300
1315-1345
1401 -1431
1139-1209
1218-1248
1257-1327
1340-1410
RUN #4
1100-1130
1632-1702
1714- 1744
1755-1825
1100-1130
1626-1656
1704- 1734
1740-1810
RUN #5
1133-1203
1218-1248
1305-1335
1347- 1417
1130-1200
1205-1235
1241 -1311
1320-1350
B-123
-------
FILE NAME - R1MHCL
RUN tt - RUN1HCL
LOCATION - MAIN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/23/89
PROJECT tt - 9102
PROG. =VER •;>&/' -:'3/89
06-29-1990 06:22:20
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet:> =
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet>=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak ~:ate Ccu ft/min) =
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet:> =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)=
Barometric Pressure (in Hq) =
Static Pressure (Inches H20!i =
Percent O.xygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml) =
Percent Waber=
Average Meter Temperature (F)=
Average Delta H (in H20:> =
Average Delta P (in H20)=
Average Stack Temperature (F) =
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight*5
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20!>!
% Isokinetic-
Pitot Coefficients
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)=
Stack Axis #1 CInches:» =
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)*
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/mini'
(Standard, Wet, Cubic
Fl ow
r * ww I *,c\ we. \ n<_ u UICI J> • *«*U«I^ X •• I w / III x i i .' —
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min:> =
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Part iculate
Part iculate
Weight (gi> =
Loading, Dry
Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - R1MHCL
RUN tt - RUN1HCL
LOCATION - MAIN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/23/39
PROJECT 4* - 3102
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meter 3)=
Meter Fact or =
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters>=
Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters 3=
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
06-29-1990 06:22:25
Sas
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg!> =
Static Pressure (mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average Meter
Average Delta
Average Delta
Average Stack
Temperature (C) =
H (mm H20>=
P (mm H20> =
Temperature (C> =
Dry Molecular Uleight =
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20><
'/• Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficients
Sampling Time =
Stack Axis #2 (Meters:> =
P-ectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters)=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/miri)=
ri*w rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. '
pa>'ticulate Loading, Actual Cmg/cu m) =
^mission Rate (kg/hr)=
NC| Back Half Analysis
22.413
24.144
0.991
0.0000
1.711
1. 599
739
-10
5.9
26.3
0.0
0.0
33
22.4
12.7
149
32.44
32.44
3.5637
75.7
0.83
120.0
6.35
1.219
2.438
2.973
823
2,448
1,653
1,653
0.0000
0.0
0.0
0.00
Corr. to 77. O2 & 127. CO:
0.0 0.0
B-125
-------
FILE NAME - R1MHCL
RUN # - RUN1HCL
LOCATION - MAIN ESP OL7LZ7 DUC'
DATE - 10/23/39
PROJECT 4* - 9102
PROG.=VER 06/09/39
06-29-1990 06:22:47
Point #
4
5
a
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
13
19
20
21
24
Delta
P Delta H
(in. H20) (ir, . H20)
0.500
0 . 500
0 . 500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0 . 500
0 . 500
0.500
0.500
0 . 50O
0.500
0 . 500
0 . 500
0.500
0.500
0 . 500
0 . 500
0.500
0 . 500
0.500
0 . 500
0.500
0 . 500
Blank
<.
i
t
•
t
(
i
i
(
(
i
i
i
t
).S8
'.33
>.3S
.38
..38
.33
).3S
.38
>.3S
.38
).S8
.33
>.S8
.83
.38
« .38
0. 38
0 . 38
0.88
0 . 38
O.BB
0 . 33
0 . 83
0 . 88
Final Wt .
(q)
0.0000
0.0000
Final Wt .
0.0000
0 . 0000
(mg/ml !> = 0.
Stack T Merer T
CF:I
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
Tare Wt .
(g)
0.0000
0 . 0000
Tare Wt .
0 . 0000
0 . 0000
0000
I n ( F :>
81
32
34
36
37
90
86
33
39
90
92
95
33
9O
39
90
90
90
8B
33
SB
33
89
89
Blank
0.0000
0 . 0000
Vol.
Cml)
0.0
0.0
Out CF:>
80
36
93
99
1 00
101
85
39
93
102
104
104
83
33
90
92
93
94
3S
33
90
92
92
93
Wt. Net Wt.
(g)
0.0000
0 . 0000
Net Wt.
(g)
0. 0000
0.0000
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINQERS
Probe Rinse
I nip i n ger Blank (.mg/ml'.'— 0. 0000
B-126
-------
NAME - R1SHC
- RLJN1BHCL
VJN - 3YPA23
""10/23/33
CT rt - 3101
i=F 2UTLZT DUCT
3-29-1
O6/03/89
930 06:37s34
ial Meter Volume < CUBIC Feet.; =
•i Meter Volume 'Cubic Feet>=
*- Factors
1 Leak Rate t-:u ft/min) =
Met er Vo 1 ume < Cub i c Feet .> =
Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet
metric Fr assure (in Hq)=
i': Pressure (Inches H20> =
ent Oxygen=
ent Carbon Dioxide=
ture Collected (ml)«
ant Water=
rteter Temperature
Delta H Cin H20)=
Delta p (in H20>-
a9e Stack Temperature CF)
Molecular Weights
Molecular Weight
Square Root of Delta P (in H20)'
etic =
* Coefficients
ling Time
-------
- R2MHCL
- R2riHCL
GN - MAI
- ID./29/39
1:7 ft - 9102
PROG.=VER 06/03/ 83
07-02-1390 06:25:56
al lie car Volume (Cubic Feet) =
Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Factor=
Leak Rate (cu ft/min!> =
eter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
:-lume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet):
etric Pressure (in Hg>=
- Pressure (Inches H20) =
352.300
914.720
0. 331
0, 000
61.264
58.353
nt Oxygen=
nt Carbon Dioxide=
ure Col 1 ected (ml ) =
~t Water=
4.4
2S.5
0. 0
0. 0
qe Meter Temperature (F)=
ge Delta H"(in H20>=
ge Delta P (in H20:> =
ge Stack Temperature (F)=
olecular Weight=
olecular Weight=
ge Square Root of Delta P
k inet ic =
Coefficient=
ing Time CMinutes)=
a Diameter (Inches)=
Axis ttl (Inches!) =
Axis #2 (Incnes.) =
ngular Stack
Area (Square Feet:> =
(in H20!> =
Ve 1 C'C i t y (Ac t ua 1 , Feet /in i n ) =
Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min!) =
rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)=
culate Loading - Front Half
culate Weight (g)=
culate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
culate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft>=
ion Rate (lb/hr)=
ck Half Analysis
75
0.36
0.500
300
32.74
32.74
0.7071
79.3
0.83
120.0
0.250
43.0
36.0
32.00
2,S33
86,021
58,144
58,144
0.0000
0.0000
0,0000
0.00
Corr. to 77. 02 8< 127. C02
0.0000 0.0000
:0
B-130
-------
* * METRIC UNITS
FILE NAME - R2MHCL
RUN » - R2MHCL
LOCATION - MAIN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/29/39
PROJECT 4* - '3102
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters:> =
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters.» =
Final Leak Rate (cu m/mini=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters>=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure (mm H20."> =
Percent Gxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature (C> =
Average Del-ta H (mm H20) =
Average Delta P (.mm H2O) =
Average Stack Temperature (C)=»
Dry Molecular Weight*
«iet Molecular Weight =
Average Square Root of Delta P »
Emission Rate
-------
FILE NAME - R2MHCL
RUN # - R2MHCL
LOCATION - MAIN ESP QU
DATE - 10/23/39
PROG.=VER 06/03/93
07-02-1330 06:25:22
D'JC"
:'oint *
1
2
o
•i
5
fa
7
3
3
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
13
13
20
21
22
23
24
Delta P
C in
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
. H20)
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
Del
< in.
'-.' .
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
**•' •
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
ta H
H20)
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
36
Stack
CF:>
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
300
30O
300
T Meter T
InCF)
S3
•-i -i
64
64
56
67
63
71
72
74
75
77
74
76
75
76
77
77
74
75
75
76
76
76
Out CF)
62
64
63
72
75
77
71
75
32
36
33
31
73
73
31
S3
34
34
77
77
30
33
83
34
Fr act ion
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fr act ion
PROBE RINSE
IWRINGERS
Probe Rinse Blank
I mp i nger Blank ( mg / m 1 !> = 0. 0000
Final
Cg)
0.0000
0.0000
Final
Cg)
0.0000
0.0000
Cmg/ml )=
Wt. Tare Wt .
<.g:>
0 . 0000
0 . OOOO
Wt. Tare Wt .
Cg:>
0.0000
0 . 0000
0. 0000
Blank Wt .
Cg!)
0.0000
0.0000
Vol.
(ml)
0.0 0.
0.0 0.
Net Wt
cg:>
0.0000
0 . 0000
Net Wt
Cg>
0000
0000
B-132
-------
FILE NAME - R2B',-'•'•'.•'-
RUN # - R2BHCL
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/29/39
PROJECT # - 9102
Initial Meter Volumes (Cubic Feet!> =
Fir.ol Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate Ccu ft/min:i =
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet:> =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet!> =
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)=
Static Pressure (Inches H20:> =
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml) =
Percent Water=
Averaqe Meter Temperature =
Average Delta H (in H203=
Average Delta P (in H20)=
Average Stack Temperature =
Stack Axis #1 CInches>=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches>=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow, rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/mirO
Tlow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)
j 4-
Particulate Loading - Front Half
^articulate Weight (g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual
-------
* * METRIC UNITS *
FILE NAME - R2BHCL
RUN # - R2BHCL
;..::CATIGN - BYPASS ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/29/39
PROJECT # - 9102
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters:> =
final Meter Volume (Cubic MetersJ=
r1 e f, e r F a c t o r =
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Me'cers) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure unm H20) =
Percent Dv;ygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Mo i =>t ur e Col I ec t ed (ml :> =
Percent Watsr=
Average Meter Temperature (C:> =
Average Delta H (,nm H2C) =
Average Delta P (.mm H20) =
Average Stack Temperature =
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20:> =
'/. Isokinetic =
Pi tot Coefficients
Sampling Time (Minutes!) =
Nozzle Diameter (,Tim.') =
Stack Axis ttl (Meters:) =
Stack Axis 4*2 (Meter =,')-
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters:> =
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min:> =
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min:> =
n ow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic =
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)=
particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight =
Particulate Loading, Actual
-------
FILE NAME - R2BHCL
RUN * - R2BHCL
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP CL'TLET DUCT
DATE - 10/23/89
PROJECT tt - 9102
Point *
1
3
PRGG.«VEr 06/03/83
07-02-1?9O OS; 35 »
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
13
20
21
*~v—*
^«*
23
24
Delta P
tin. H20>
0.500
0.500
0.50O
0.500
0.500
O.500
U.500
C.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.50O
0.500
O.50O
0.500
0.500
0.50O
O.50O
0.500
0.500
0.5OO
0.50O
0.50O
0.50O
Delta H
^in. H20)
0.38
0.38
0.38
0.88
0.88
o.aa
0.38
0.38
0.88
0.38
0.38
0.88
O.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
O.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
Stack T
(F.« I
530
58O
580
530
58O
58O
580
SSO
580
58O
580
sao
58O
580
580
580
58O
580
580
580
S8O
530
380
580
n
73
66
63
71
72
73
73
71
73
74
74
75
75
67
69
72
73
74
74
Metar T
i Out
-------
FILE NAME - R3MHCL
RUN tt - R3MHCL
LOCATION - MAIN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/30/39
PROJECT 4* - 9102
PROG.=VER 06/09/39
O7-O2-1990 06:46:21
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Final Me.ter Volume (Cubic Feet') =
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Gas Volume CDr/ Standard Cubic Feet)'
Barometric Pressure (in Hg!> =
Static Pressure (Inches H20) =
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml) =
Percent Water =
Average Meter Temperature (F) =
Average Delta H (in H20) =
Average Delta P (in H20) =
Average Stack Temperature (F) =
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square
7. I soki net ic =
Root of Delta P (in H20) =
Pitot Coeffie lent =
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)8
Stack Axis #1 (Inches.') =
Stack Axis #2 (Inches)=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf!> =
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (lb/hr)=
No Back Half Analysis
916.OOO
976.000
0.991
0. 000
59.460
60.403
29.58
-0.41
4.a
23. 2
0.0
0.0
55
0.90
0.580
321
32.70
32.70
0.7616
75.9
0.83
120.0
0.250
48.0
96.0
32.00
2,914
93,262
62,270
62,270
O.OOOO
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
Corr. to 77. 02 ?< 12% C02
0.0000 0.0000
B-136
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - R3MHCL
- R3MHCL
OCATION - MAIN E3F OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/30/85
PROJECT tt - 9102
Ir.itiai Meter Volume (Cubic- Meters 5 =
Final Me tar Volume (Cubic Meters!> =
Meter Fact or =
Final Leak Rate ;>:u m/min5 =
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
'•ass Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg) =
Static Pressure (mm H20!> =
Percent Oxygen*
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average Meter
Average Delta
Average Delta
Average Stack
Temperature (C) =
H (mm H20)=
P Cmm H20)=
Temperature (C'.) =
Dry
Wet
Molecular
Molecular
Weight=
Weight=
Averaqe Square Root of Delta P =
Nossie Diameter (mm> =
Stack Axis ttl CMeters3=
Stack Axis #2 (Meter»)»
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters'J =
Stack Velocity (Actual,
(Actual, Cubic
rate
Flow rate
Flow rate
(Standard, Wet,
(Standard, Dry,
m/min:> =
m/min5=
Cubic m/min)!
Cubic m/min>:
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g> =
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu i
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m>'
Emission Rate (kg/hr)=
NC. Back Half Analysis
25.937
27.636
0.991
0.0000
1.6S4
1.710
751
-10
4.8
2S.2
0.0
0.0
13
22.9
14.7
161
32.70
32.70
3.8382
75.9
0.83
120.0
6.35
1.219
2.438
2.973
888
2,641
1,763
1,763
o.oooo
0.0
0.0
0.00
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
07-02-1990 06:46:25
Corr
to 77. 02
0.0
12'/. C02
0.0
B-137
-------
FILE NAME - R3MHCL
RUN # - R3MHCL
LOCATION - MAIN ESP
DATE - 10/30/39
PROJECT tt - 9102
OUTLET DUG:
PROG.=VER 06/03/39
07-02-139O 06:46:48
tt
4
5
6
3
3
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1 "7
.1. .'
18
19
20
21
24
Del ba
P Delta H
(in. H20:< (in. H20
0 . 530
0 . 530
0 . 530
0 . 580
0 . 580
0 . 530
0.580
0 . 580
0. 530
0 . 580
0 . 530
0 . 580
0.530
0 . 530
0 . 580
0.580
0 . 530
0 . 530
0.580
0 . 580
0.530
0 . 580
0.580
0 . 580
Blank
0. 30
0 . 30
0.30
0.30
0.30
0 . 90
0.30
0 . 30
0 . 30
0 . 90
0.90
0 . 30
0.30
0.30
0.90
0 . 90
0.90
0.90
0 . 90
0 . 90
0 . 30
0 . 9O
0.90
0 . 90
Final Wt .
<9>
0.0000
0 . 0000
Final Wt .
(g:>
o.oooo
0. 0000
(mg/mi;>= 0.
3t ac k
:> CD
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
321
Tare Wt
O.OOOO
0.0000
Tare Wt
<9>
O.OOOO
0 . 0000
0000
T Meter T
InCF)
41
42'
43
44
47
49
50
54
55
57
53
SO
54
56
55
54
54
54
50
51
c?--'
!-»*-
53
54
55
. Blank
cg:>
O.OOOO
0 . 0000
Vol .
(ml)
0. O
0 . 0
Out (F)
41
44
48
54
58
60
53
53
66
69
~7'~'
74
55
55
57
57
57
53
51
53
57
61
63
65
Wt. Net Wt.
(g>
0.0000
0 . 0000
Net Wt.
-------
,rTL£ NAME - R3SHC
RgN # - R3BHCL
LOCATION - BYPASS
DATE - 10/30/89
PROJECT # - 9102
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
07-02-1990 07=51=06
ESP OUTLET DUCT
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
pinal Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Meter Factor=
final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
(5as Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )=
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )=
percent Oxygen=
percent'Carbon Dioxide= .
Moisture Collected (ml)=
percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature ( F)=
Average Delta H ( in H20)=
Average Delta P (in H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( F)=
Molecular Ueight=
Molecular weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)=
% Isokinetic=
pitot Coefficient3
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
pectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
plow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
plow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
plow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min>
particulate Loading - Front Half
particulate Weight ( g )=
particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu.ft)=
gmission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
612.704
669 .882
1 .030
0.000
58.893
60.166
29.58
-2.80
16.3
4.7
0.0
0.0
52
0.88
0.500
580
29.40
29 .40
0.7071
89.3
0.83
120.0
0.250
24.0
96.0
16.00
3,303
52,848
26,341
26,341
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% C02
0.0000 0.0000
B-139
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - R3BHCL
RUN » - R3BHCL
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/30/89
PROJECT « - 9102
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 17.349
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )= 1C.968
Meter Factor= 1 -030
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)= 0.0000
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= 1.668
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )= 1.704
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )= 751
Static Pressure (mm H20 )= -71
Percent Oxygen= - 16.3
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 4.7
Moisture Collected (ml)= 0.0
Percent Water= 0.0
Average Meter Temperature ( C)= 11
Average Delta H (mm H20 )= 22.4
Average Delta P (mm H20 )= 12.7
Average Stack Temperature ( C )= 304
Dry Molecular Weight= 29.4O
Wet Molecular Weight= 29.4O
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20 )= 3.5637
°i Isokinetic= 89.3
PROG.=VER Ob/09/89
07-02-1990 07:51=07
Pitot Coefficient= 0.83
Sampling Time (Minutes )= 120.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm )= 6.35
Stack Axis #1 (Meters)= 0.610
Stack Axis #2 (Meters )= 2.438
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )= 1.486
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 1,007
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 1,496
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)= 746
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min)= 746
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m )= 0.0
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )= 0.0
Emission Rate (kg/hr )= 0.00
No Back Half Analysis
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% C02
0.0 0.0
B-140
-------
FILE NAME - R3BHCL
RUN * - R3BHCL
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/30/89
PROJECT * - 9102
point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
B
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
07-02-1990 07:51:09
Delta P
(in. H20 )
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
0.500
Delta H
(in. H20)
O.S8
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
0.88
Stack
(F)
r: 580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
580
T
InCF
44
47
50
52
52
52
. 50
53
55
57
58
59
54
56
57
57
57
49
52
54
56
57
57
58
Meter T
) Out(F)
45
45
46
46
46
46
48
49
50
51
52
52
53
53
54
54
54
49
50
50
50
51
51
52
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
pROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
probe Rinse Blank
impinger Blank (mg/ml)= 0.0000
Final Ult. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt
(g) (g) (g) (g)
o.oooo o.oooo o.oooo o.oooo
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Final Wt. Tare Wt .
(g) (g)
0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000
mg/ml )= 0.0000
Vol.
(ml)
0.0
0.0
Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
B-141
-------
FILE NOME - R4MHCL
Z'JN # - SUN 4HCL -- ASH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - MAIM ESP OUTLET DUCT
DnTE - 10/31/39
PROJECT # - 91OZ-5-+-13
PRCG.=VER OB/OS/89
i i-O1-1989 O9:«4:
I n i t i a 1 Met er Vo 1 ume ( Cub i c Feet) =
Final Meter- Volume ".'Cubic Feet) =
Meter- FctctoT-=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/rnin) =
Net Meter Volume {Cubic Feet)=
Gas Volume ''.Dry Standard Cubic Feet) =
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)=
Static Pressure (Inches H£O>=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature
% Isokinetic-
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nc-zzle Diameter -;inches) =
Stack Axis #1 =
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/rnin) =
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/win)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual
-------
* * METRIC UNITS-
FILE NAME - R4MHCL
RUN •» - RUN 4HCL - ASH GROVE CEMENT KILN
-OCATICN - MAIM ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/31/85
PROJECT 3 - 91O2-64-13
I n i t i a 1 Met er Vo 1 urne (C u b i c Met er s) =
ir i na I Met er Vo 1 urne (C u b i c Met er s) =
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu rn/rnin) =
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure (mm H£O) =
Percent Owygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
c.'7. 64£
£3.3S6
O.OOOO
1. 7£8
1. 701
750
-10
5. S
£4. 1
0. O
PRGG.=VER OS/O9/S9
11-01-1933 09:44:59
Average Meter
Average Delta
Average Delta
Average Stack
Temperat ure
-------
FILE NOME - R4MHCL
RUN 3 - RUN 4HCL - ASH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - MAIN ESP GU~L£T DUCT
DATE - 1O/:
PROJECT # -
Point
PROG.=VER 05/03/33
11-O1-1383 O3:45:£6
6
('
S
3
1O
1 1
i£
13
14
15
16
17
IS
13
£O
£1
££
£3
£4
1/33
S10S-64-
Delta P
(in. H£O)
0. 55O
O. 55 O
0. 550
0. 550
O. 55O
0. 55O
O. 55O
0. 550
O. 55O
O. 55O
O. 55 O
0. 550
0. 550
O. 55O
O. 55O
O. 55O
0. 550
O. 550
O. 55O
O. 55O
O. 550
O. 55O
O. 55O
O. 55O
t ~T;
Delta H
•:in. H£0>
0. 33
0. 33
0. 33
O. 33
0. 33
0. 33
O. 33
0 . 33
0 . 33
0. 33
O. 33
O. 33
O. 33
O. 33
O. 33
O. 33
O. 33
O. 33
O. 33
O. 33
O. 33
O. 33
O. 33
O. 33
Final Wt .
O. OOOO
•0. OOOO
Final Wt .
O. OOOO
O. OOOO
Stack ~r
>; F ) i
3O5
305
305
305
3O5
3O5
3O5
3O5
3O5
3O5
305
305
3O5
3O5
305
3O5
3O5
3O5
305
3O5
3O5
305
305
3O5
Tare Wt .
O. OOOO
O. OOOO
Tar-e Wt „
O. OOOO
0. OOOO
Met sr- T
nCF) Cut >:F)
53
54
55
57
53
£1
65
65
66
67
63
63
7O
72
7£
73
74
75
75
76
77
77
78
78
Blank Wt
O. OOOO
O. OOOO
Vol.
O.O
O. O
54
58
6£
££
£7
£3
65
67
7O
/ ^t
74
76
7£
73
76
78
SO
81
77
73
81
S£
83
84
. Net Wt.
0. OOOO
O. OOOO
Net Wt .
O. OOOO
O. OOOO
Fract ion
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fract ion
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Pr-obe Rinse Blank (rag/ml )= 0. OOOO
I rnpinger B1 ank (rng/rn 1) = 0. OOOO
B-144
-------
FILE NAME - R45HCL
SUM >A - RUN 4HCL - ASH 6 ROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP CUTLET DUCT
BATE - 10/31 /83
PROJECT * - 310£-54~i3
•Initial Meter Volume < Cubic Feet ) =
Final Met er Vo i urne (Cubic Feet ) =
Met er F *ct or =
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter- Volume (Cubic Feet ) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet ) =
Barometric Pressure (in Hg> =
Static Pressure (Inches H£O) =
Percent Oxygen*8
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature (F> =
Average Delta H (in H£O)=
Average Delta P (in H£O> =
Average Stack Temperature (F) =
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
PRCG.=VER O6/O3/33
11 -01-19-39 03:43:01
Average Square
"•• Zsokinetic-
Root of Delta P =
Stack fix is #£ -:inches) =
Rectangular Stack
Stack firea < Square Feet > =
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/rnin) =
Flow Rate (Actual, ' Cubic ft/rnin) =
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft /rnin)
Part icu late Loading - Front Half
Part icu late Weight (g>=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (pr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, ftctual
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * •*
FILE NflME - R4BHCL PRCG.=VER 06/O9/S9
r= £O. 761
Meter Factor** O. 8S7
Final Leak Rate (cu rn/rnin)= O. OOO2
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)88 1.534
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)= 1.52O
Barometric Pressure (rnrn Hg)= 75O
Static Pressure (mm H2O)= -73
Percent Oxygen= 16.9
Percent Carbon Dioxide88 3.7
Percent Water58 O. O
Average Meter Temperature (C) = 19
Average Delta H (mm H2O) = £2. 1
Average Delta P (mm H£O)= 14.O
Average Stack Temperature (C)= 299
Dry Molecular Weight58 £9.27
Wet Molecular Weight= . £9.27
flverage Square Root of Delta P (rnrn H£O>= 3.7376
'/' I so kinetic55 52. i
Pitot Coe f f i c i ent = O.S4
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 12O.O
Nozzle Diameter (rnrn)— 7.62
Stack flxis #1 (Meters)= O. 610
Stack fix is #2 (Meters)88 2.438
Rectangular Stack
Stack firea (Square Meters)= 1.486
Stack Velocity (Actual, rn/min)= 1,062
Flow rate (flctual, Cubic rn/min)™ 1,573
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic rn/rnin)= 793
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic rn/rnin)= 793
Particulate Loading — Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= O. OOOO Corr. to 7% O2 & 12% CO£
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu rn)= O. 0 C)> Q (-,_<-,
Particulate Loading, flctual (mg/cu rn)= O. O
Emission Rate (kg/hr)= O. OO
No Back Half Analysis
B-146
-------
FILE NOME - 34BHCL
RUN *» - RUN 4HCL - flSH GROVE CEMEN
LOCATION - BYPflSS EBP CUTLET DUCT
DATE - 1O/31/S9
PROJECT # - 3102-64-13
KILN
PROG.=VER 06/09/39
11-0 i-136? OS:4S:55
:'oint # Delta P
1
£
3
4
5
6
7
a
9
10
11
1£
13
14
15
15
1 7
IS
19
£O
£1
£2
23
£4
,; i r
O.
0.
O.
O.
0.
O.
0.
O.
O.
0.
0.
0.
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
• O.
O.
0.
O.
O.
0.
O.
,. H2O)
550
550
55O
550
550
550
550
55O
550
55O
550
55O
550
55O
550
550
55O
55O
550
550
55O
55O
55O
550
Del
,ta H
Stack
0.
0.
O.
O .
O.
O.
0.
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
O.
O.
O.
O.
O.
O.
O.
0.
O.
0.
O.
O.
37
37
37
S7
37
87
37
37
37
37
37
37
87
87
37
87
87
37
87
87
37
87
37
87
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
57O
570
57O
570
57O
57O
57O
57O
57O
57O
57O
570
T Meter T
I r, >; F )
57
64
56
57
69
59
53
S3
55
67
7O
7O
53
7O
71
73
73
74
70
71
71
71
71
71
out >:F>
57
59
5O
61
53
54
57
52
64
54
55
66
66
66
67
67
63
58
63
68
63
53
53
63
Fract ion
DRV CATCH
FILTER
Fr-act ion
PROBE RINSE
1MPIN6ERS
Probe Rinse Blank
Irnpinger Blank = O. OOOO
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt
O. OOOO
O. OOOO
Final
< g >
O. OOOO
O. OOOO
{rng/rnl ) =
O. OOOO
O. OOOO
Wt. Tare Wt.
(g)
O. OOOO
O. OOOO
0. OOOO
0. OOOO
O. OOOO
Vol.
O. OOOO
0. OOOO
B-147
-------
FILE NAME - R5MHCL
RUN # - R5MHCL
LOCATION - MAIiN ESP
DATE - 11/2/89
PROJECT * - 9102
OUTLET DUCT
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
07-02-1990 08:19:30
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate ( cu f t/min )-
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )
Barometric Pressure (in Hg )=
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature ( F )=
Average Delta H (in H20 )=
Average Delta P (in H20 )=
Average Stack Temperature ( F )=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Ueight=
Average Square
% Isokinetic=
Root of Delta P (in H20 )=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet )=
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry
Feet/min )=
ft/min )=
Cubic ft/min>
Cubic ft/min>
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu f t )=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
38.150
97 .618
0.991
0.000
58.933
59.911
29.72
-0.41
5.2
27.4
0.0
0.0
57
0.89
0.590
317
32.59
32.59
0.7681
74.1
0.83
120.0
0.250
48.0
96.0
32.00
2,930
93,761
63,224
63,224
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% C02
0.0000 0.0000
B-148
-------
* * METRIC UNITS
FILE NAME - R5MHCL
RUN » - R5MHCL
LOCATION - MAIN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 11/2/89
PROJECT # - 9102
PRCG.=VER 06/09/89
07-02-1990 08:19:32
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min )=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg )=
Static Pressure (mm H20 )=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected ( ml)=
Percent Uater=
Average Meter Temperature ( C)=
Average Delta H (mm H20 )=
Average Delta P (mm H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( C)=
Dry Molecular Ueight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)=
% Isokinetic=
pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter ( mm)=
Stack Axis #1 (Meters )=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual,
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Wet
Flow rate (Standard, Dry
m/min )=
m/min )=
, Cubic m/min )=
, Cubic m/min )=
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g )=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m )=
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )=
Emission Rate (kg/hr )=
No Back Half Analysis
1 .080
2.764
0.991
0.0000
1 .669
1.696
755
-10
5.2
27.4
0.0
0.0
14
22.6
15.0
158
32.59
32.59
3.8712
74.1
0.83
120.0
6.35
1 .219
2.438
2.973
893
2,655
1,790
1,790
0.0000
0.0
0.0
0.00
Corr. to 7% 02 & 12% C02
0.0 0.0
B-149
-------
FILE NAME - R5MHCL
RUN # - R5MHCL
LOCATION - MAIN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 11/2/89
PROJECT * - 9102
Point
1
2
3
,4
5
6
7 •
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
P*-obe Rinse
Impinger
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
07-02-1990 08:19:34
Delta
P Delta H
( in. H20) ( in. H20
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0.590
0 .590
0.590
s Blank
0.89
0.89 .
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0 .89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
Final Ut
(9)
0.0000
0.0000
Final Wt
(g)
0 . 0000
0 . 0000
( mg/ml )= 0
Stack T
) (F) I
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
317
. Tare Ut .
(9)
0.0000
0.0000
. Tare Wt .
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
.0000
Meter T
n(F)
37
40
46
47
48
50
52
53
54
56
58
59
57
57
57
58
58
59
58
60
60
60
61
62
Blank
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Vol.
(ml)
0.0
0.0
Out(F)
44
42
52
54
56
57
53
57
61
63
64
65
57
60
62
62
63
65
59
63
65
65
66
66
Wt. Net Wt
(9)
0.0000
0.0000
Net Wt
(9)
0.0000
0.0000
.ank ( mg/ml )= 0.0000
B-150
-------
FILE NAME - R5BHCL
RUN * - R5BHCL
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP
DATE - 11/02/89
PROJECT « - 9102
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
07-02-1990 08:41:05
OUTLET DUCT
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet )=
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)=
Static Pressure (Inches H20 )=
percent Oxygen=
percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected ( ml )=
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature ( F)=
Average Delta H (in H20)=
Average Delta P ( in H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( F)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (in H20)=
% Isokinetic=
pitot Coefficient3
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter (Inches )=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches )=
Stack Axis #2 (Inches )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)=
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Uet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)=
particulate Loading - Front Half
particulate Weight (g)=
particulate Loading, Dry Std.,(gr/scf)=
particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (Ib/hr )=
NO Back Half Analysis
733.596
784.313
1 .030
0.000
52.238
52.925
29.72
-2.80
16.8
3.8
0.0
0.0
59
0.89
0.460
570
29.28
29.28
0.6782
97.4
0.83
100.0
0.250
24.0
96.0
16.00
3,152
50,433
25,502
25,502
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12% C02
0.0000 0.0000
B-151
-------
FILE NAME - R5BHCL
RUN # - R5BHCL
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP
DATE - 11/02/89
PROJECT * - 9102
* METRIC UNITS *
OUTLET DUCT
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu m/min)=
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters )=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters )=
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure (mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml)=
Percent Uater=
Average Meter Temperature ( C)=
Average Delta H (mm H20)=
Average Delta P (mm H20)=
Average Stack Temperature ( C)=
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20)=
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficients
Sampling Time (Minutes )=
Nozzle Diameter ( mm)=
Stack Axis #1 (Meters )=
Stack Axis #2 (Meters )=
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters )=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)=
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic
Flow rate (Standard, Uet,
Flow rate (Standard, Dry,
Cubic
Cubic
m/min)
m/min)
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight ( g )=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std . ( mg/cu m )=
Particulate Loading, Actual (mg/cu m )=
Emission Rate ( kg/hr )=
20.773
22.209
1 .030
0.0000
1 .479
1 .499
755
-71
16.8
3.8
0.0
0.0
15
22.6
11.7
299
29.28
29.28
3.4182
97.4
0.83
100.0
6.35
0.610
2.438
1 .486
961
1 ,428
722
722
0.0000
0.0
0.0
0.00
PROG.=VER Ob/09/39
07-02-1990 08:41:07
Corr . to 7% 02 & 12% C02
0.0 0.0
No Back Half Analysis
B-152
-------
FILE NAME - R5BHCL
RUN # - R5BHCL
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 11/02/89
PROJECT * - 9102
Point
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
PROG.=VER 06/09/99
07-02-1990 08:41:03
Fraction
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Fraction
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
probe Rinse
Impinger Bl
Delta P
(in. H20)
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0 .460
0.460
0.460
0.460
0
0
0
0
Delta H
( in. H20
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
. 0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
0.89
Final Ult
(g)
.0000
.0000
Final Ult
(9)
.0000
.0000
Blank ( mg/ml )= o
ank (mg/ml
Stack
) (F)
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
570
. Tare Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
. Tare Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
.0000
T Meter T
In(F)
49
54
57
58
60
60
58
59
61
61
61
63
61
62
63
63
64
65
58
59
. Blank
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
vol .
(ml)
0.0
0.0
Out(F)
48
50
51
52
54
55
57
57
58
58
59
59
61
62
61
61
61
61
61
62
Wt. Net Wt
(g)
0.0000
0.0000
Net Wt
(9)
0.0000
0.0000
)= 0.0000
B-153
-------
APPENDIX B-9
VOLATILE ORGANICS DATA
B-155
-------
NOTE: All leak checks of the VOST were passed with the exception of the final
leak check for test Run 1 at the bypass duct. The Teflon seating located
between the sample probe and the VOST valve assembly was replaced following
Run 1, and no other problems were encountered through Runs 2 through 5.
VOST SAMPLING TIMES
VOST PAIR NUMBER
MAIN DUCT
1
2
3
BYPASS DUCT
1
2
3
24-HOUR TIME
RUNtl
1548-1623
1730-1735
1750-1810
1855-1915
1924-1933
1941-2007
1552-1627
1732-1737
1744-1809
1856-1911
1918-1933
1942-2007
RUN #2
1201 - 1241
1252-1319
1329-1342
1350-1401
1409-1438
1202-1242
1250-1330
1341 - 1421
RUN #3
1144-1224
1233-1308
1316-1321
1330-1347
1358-1421
1141 -1221
1228-1308
1316-1356
RUN #4
1100-1140
1632-1712
1720-1746
1755-1809
1100-1140
1633-1713
1722-1802
RUN #5
1133-1213
1220-1300
1308-1336
1345-1357
1130-1210
1218-1258
1306-1346
B-157
-------
ADJUSTED TRAP PAIR VOLUMES - OMAHA KILN STUDY
SAMPLE TRAP
RUN #
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
4
4
5
5
5
5
5
5
LOCATION #
MAIN
MAIN
MAIN
BYPASS
BYPASS
BYPASS
MAIN
MAIN
MAIN
BYPASS
BYPASS
BYPASS
MAIN
MAIN
MAIN
BYPASS
BYPASS
BYPASS
MAIN
MAIN
MAIN
BYPASS
BYPASS
BYPASS
MAIN
MAIN
MAIN
BYPASS
BYPASS
BYPASS
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
2
3
METER
TEMP.
(F)
23
24
24
24
25
27
19
19
19
22
23
24
8
9
9
11
14
14
14
18
18
20
23
26
8
9
10
15
20
21
PRESSURE
(in Hg)
29.11
29.11
29.11
29.11
29.11
29.11
29.13
29.13
29.13
29.13
29.13
29.13
29.42
29.42
29.42
29.42
29.42
29.42
29.48
29.48
29.48
29.48
29.48
29.48
29.72
29.72
29.72
29.72
29.72
29.72
TRAP
VOLUME
(L)
20.000
19.970
20.000
20.011
20.040
20.013
20.000
19.770
20.000
20.011
20.029
20.017
19.970
19.950
19.970
20.028
20.011
20.032
19.930
20.000
19.800
20.023
20.012
20.008
20.000
20.000
19.880
20.014
20.029
20.021
METER ADJUSTED
CORRECTION
FACTOR
0.999
0.999
0.999
1.016
1.016
1.016
0.999
0.999
0.999
1.016
1.016
1.016
0.999
0.999
0.999
1.016
1.016
1.016
0.999
0.999
0.999
1.016
1.016
1.016
0.999
0.999
0.999
1.016
1.016
1.016
VOLUME
(L)
19.24
19.15
19.18
19.31
19.48
19.32
19.52
19.29
19.52
19.66
19.61
19.53
20.45
20.36
20.38
20.64
20.41
20.43
20.03
19.82
19.62
20.04
19.83
19.63
20.69
20.62
20.42
20.55
20.21
20.14
STANDARD =
VOLUME
VOLUME * PRESSURE * 293 K * METER
MEASURED MEASURED FACTOR
29.92 in Hg * (METER TEMPERATURE + 273 K)
B-158
-------
Appendix B-9
Volatile Organic* Analysis
Data Summary
VOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SUMMARY
This Data Summary describes the analysis of volatile samples collected
from the Ash Grove Cement Kiln, Louisville, Nebraska. Two samples types were
analyzed for volatile organic components: VOST traps and VOST condensate
water samples. Analysis of samples began on November 8, 1989 and proceeded
until November 15, 1989. All VOST trap samples were analyzed on a Finnigan/
MAT 312 double-focusing magnetic sector GC/MS system, and all VOST condensate
samples were analyzed on a Finnigan/MAT CH4 single-focusing magnetic sector
GC/MS system.
Analysis consisted of three phases: POHC analysis, Tentatively
Identified Compound analysis (TIC) and General Organic Screen analysis for the
determination of products of incomplete combustion (PIC's). The POHC analysis
consisted of a fully quantitative target compound analysis, Including analysis
of authentic POHC standards and quantHatlon using response factors based on a
multipoint standard curve. The organic screen consisted of a semiquantitatlve
target compound analysis in which PIC target compound amounts were quantHated
using response factors derived from a single point calibration standard. The
NBS mass spectral database was used as the reference library for the forward
search. POHC analysis was performed on both VOST and VOST condensate samples,
while PIC and TIC analysis was performed on the VOST samples only. Additional
details regarding each of these three analysis types are described below. For
a more complete description of the objectives and guidelines for these
analyses, please refer to the Draft Test and QA Plan, Work Assignment No. 64
(October 11, 1989).
1.0 POHC ANALYSIS
Analytical and quality assurance procedures which were used for POHC
analysis were the same as those typically used for trial burn tests and are
essentially Identical to EPA SW-846 (Rev. 3) Methods 8240 and 5040. Modifi-
cations from these methods which were followed by MRI for this test were noted
1n the Test/QA Plan.
One POHC compound, monochlorobenzene, was selected fro this study. In
addition, one Internal standard (ds-benzene) and two surrogate compounds
(d%-l,2-dichloroethane and da-toluene) were also used.
Two separate procedures were used to analyze the two sample types:
purge-and-trap GC/MS for the analysis of VOST condensate water samples, and
VOST desorption GC/MS for the analysis of the VOST cartridges. Separate cali-
bration curves and QA data were generated for each of these two procedures.
B-159
-------
Appendix B-9
Volatile Organlcs Analysis
Data Summary
2.0 ORGANIC SCREEN ANALYSIS
The organic screen was conducted on the VOST samples using the same GC/MS
dataflles that were generated for the POHC analysis. The major difference
between this analysis and the POHC analysis was that only a single calibration
standard was analyzed to determine response factors for the PIC target com-
pounds and no daily PIC verification standards were run. Quantitation of PIC
compounds was performed via the Internal standard method using response
factors determined from the single-point calibration standard.
3.0 TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUND ANALYSIS
TIC analysis was performed on the VOST samples using the same GC/MS
dataflles that were generated for the POHC analysis. In this analysis, the
five largest GC/MS peaks in each of the VOST samples were selected. The
corresponding mass spectra for each of these peaks were then searched against
the NBS/EPA mass spectral database using the F1nnigan/INCOS mass spectral
searching program, LIBR. The LIBR program output consisted of a 11st of the
best ten matches to the unknown mass spectrum. The results of each library
search were then manually reviewed and the most appropriate match chosen from
the 11st of candidate compounds. The reduced list of TIC compounds found in
each sample was then checked by a second staff member experienced 1n mass
spectral Interpretation.
4.0 DATA ORGANIZATION
Results of this analysis are available in two forms: summary reports and
"raw" GC/MS data. The summary reports are attached to this memo and the raw
data has been approprlatedly stored for possible future reference1. The
contents of each of these two data formats are summarized below:
A. Summary Reports
1. Calibration Standard Preparation Summary
2. Calibration Curve Analysis Summary
3. Dally Standard and Blank Analysis Summary
4. SPCC Control Chart
5. VOST Analysis Summary
6. VOST Condensate Analysis Summary
7. VOST Organic Screen Analysis Summary
8. VOST Tentatively Identified Compound Summary
B. Raw Data
1. Dally PRK spectrum and mass listing
2. Dally BFB spectrum, mass listing and mass calibration summary
3. Daily POHC spectrum and mass listing from the first daily
verification standard
4. PARA printouts for each GC/MS dataflles
5. QUAN quantitatlon report printouts for each GC/MS dataflle
6. RIC and ion plots for each GC/MS dataflle
7. Copies of all relevant 1aboratory/MS instrument logbook pages
8. Calibration curve products, including RESP call curve plots,
EDRL listings and average relative response factors.
B-160
-------
Appendix B-9
Volatile Organlcs Analysis
Data Summary
5.0 ADDITIONAL NOTES REGARDING THIS ANALYSIS
5.1 All samples were analyzed within the 14 day holding time specified
1n the Test/QA Plan.
5.2 Two calibration curves were generated during the course of the VOST
analysis and one curve was generated for the VOST condensate analysis.
Relative standard deviations for the surrogates and POHC were well within the
specifications of the the Test/QA Plan. All dally system blanks and dally
standards were also within the Test/QA Plan specifications.
5.3 A BFB standard was analyzed at the beginning of each 12 hour
shift. All BFB runs passed the Test/QA specifications.
5.4 An Independently prepared QA performance check sample was analyzed
on each of the two GC/MS systems used in this study. Only one compound,
monochlorobenzene was added to the QA check sample. Both of the GC/MS systems
passed the 60-120% POHC recovery accuracy requirement specified in the Test/QA
Plan.
5.5 Limit of QuantHation (LOQ) values were determined for the POHC and
for PIC's by finding the peak height of a give compound's quantitation ion at
a known concentration, extrapolating to find the concentration of the compound
at the Instrument hardware threshold, and multiplying the extrapolated
concentration by a multiplication factor.
LOQ . C(stdl x H (thresh) x Factor
"(std)
where:
^(std) * concentration of standard compound
"(std) * Peak height of standard compound
"(threshold) - instrument hardware threshold (units of peak ht)
Factor - multiplication factor
The multiplication factor used for this study was 10, I.e., a signal had
to rise 10 times above the instrument hardware threshold in order for it to be
considered a quantifiable peak. The use of a multiplication factor of 10 is
somewhat arbitrary; its purpose is to eliminate the reporting of false posi-
tives from spurious signals and to raise the minimum quantifiable value to a
level that 1s hopefully within the linear range for that compound. As an
example, the following equation shows the LOQ that was determined for the POHC
in VOST samples:
inn = 5 nq x 100 counts ln _
LOQ 82$ counts x 10 = 6 ng
It should be noted that this LOQ value is very close to the concentration
of the standard used in the equation. This is because the data used to
B-161
-------
Appendix B-9
Volatile Organlcs Analysis
Data Summary
calculate this LOQ came from the lowest level standard 1n the VOST calibration
curve, and the mass spectrometer sensitivity was Intentionally adjusted so
that this standard would fall near the limit of quantltatlon, thereby
maximizing the linear range of the calibration curve.
5.6 In addition to observing all of the normal QA requirements specified
1n Methods 9240 and 5050, an additional QA standard containing three System
Performance Calibration Check (SPCC) compounds was analyzed on a dally basis.
A multipoint SPCC calibration curve was not generated. The dally SPCC com-
pound response factors were plotted versus time as a check of the Instruments'
continuing system performance.
5.7 Two VOST samples (3040 and 3044) were received cracked. However,
there was no loss of absorbent material so the contents of these traps were
transferred to clean unbroken tubes prior to analysis. Immediately before the
transfer of absorbent material was performed, the sample was spiked with the
Internal standard surrogates so that any losses Incurred during the transfer
might be estimated. There was no loss of Tenax from sample 3040 but a small
amount of Tenax was lost from sample 3044 during the transfer. The difference
1n I.S. and surrogate signal between these two samples and the other samples
and standards analyzed on the same day was estimated to be ca. 20# to 25%.
However, this figure may not necessarily be relevant to the amount of POHC or
other compounds that were lost since the time the sample was collected. It
should also be noted that the I.S. and surrogates were spiked on the cracked
tube using a flow of Inert gas to transport them onto the absorbent material.
Thus, some loss of I.S. and surrogates may have occurred 1f any portion of the
carrier gas flowed through the crack rather than through the tube. Since so
many factors related to the quantltatlon of these samples could not be fully
quantified, no correction was made to the amounts of any compounds found 1n
these samples.
5.8 One sample, 5043, was received broken. However, a significant
amount of absorbent material had spilled from the tube during shipment so 1t
was not possible to salvage 1t using the procedure described above.
5.9 One sample, 3051, broke while Its contents were being purged onto
the GC/MS. The Internal standard responses for this sample was only ca. 1555
to 20%, compared to other samples and standards that were analyzed on the same
day. No correction was made to any compound amounts found 1n this sample
since the I.S. was spiked onto the tube while 1t was still Intact. Thus, 1t
may be assumed that the loss of I.S. was representative of the loss of any
other compounds which may have been on the trap.
5.10 The field blank pairs for Runs 4 and 5 (4046, 4047, 5056, and 5057)
were not analyzed. It should be noted that no POHC was observed 1n the flelc'
blank pairs for Runs 1, 2, or 3.
5.11 Very high levels of native benzene and toluene were observed 1n
many of the VOST samples. Unfortunately, the Test/QA Plan called for
d6-benzene to serve as the Internal standard for this analysis. Based
strictly on a comparison of mass spectral overlap, the presence of native
B-162
-------
Appendix B-9
Volatile Organlcs Analysis
Data Summary
benzene should not have caused any Interference to the d6-benzene signal.
However, the presence of large amounts of benzene did 1n fact severely alter
the MS response of the d6-benzene 1n this study. Since the two compounds are
chemically and physically Identical (or nearly so), they exhibit nearly the
same GC elutlon characteristics and thus enter the mass spectrometer at the
same time. It 1s unclear whether the observed change 1n the d6-benzene
response was due to chromatographic or mass spectrometric effects, although
the latter 1s the most likely possibility. A similar change 1n da-toluene
response was also observed when native toluene was present 1n large quanti-
ties, although the change was much less severe than that for benzene. As a
result, the Internal standard used to quantltate POHC concentrations 1n VOST
samples was changed, from ds-benzene to da-toluene (1t should be noted that the
Internal standard and surrogates were added to the samples at the same time,
thus allowing their roles to be switched). The switch from d6-benzene to
da-toluene resulted 1n a more consistent Internal standard response throughout
the sample set, although the d6-benzene, 1n Its new role as surrogate,
exhibited very poor and erratic recovery values as a result. No significant
amounts of benzene or toluene were observed in the VOST condensates and so
ds-benzene continued to be used as the Internal standard for these samples.
5.12 Many of the compounds reported as TICs were not actually Identified
by a specific compound name but rather in terms of a compound class. This 1s
due to the fact that many compounds have similar mass spectra. In such cases,
the library search program was unable to locate a unique match but was suc-
cessful 1n providing at least some structural or class Information related to
the unknown compound. In these cases, the most general compound description
encompassing the range of library candidate compounds was given. For example,
a search of a peak 1n sample 1042 resulted 1n a number of library candidate
compounds of the general formula Ci0H22» yet no single candidate compound was
significantly better than the others 1n Its match to the unknown spectrum. As
a result, the peak was Identified simply as "decene," with the understanding
that no further information regarding the location of the double bond could be
discerned from the available Information.
5.13 For the quantltatlon of TICs 1n the samples, a different approach
to the Internal standard problem had to be used. Quantltatlon of TICs usually
consists of comparing the absolute response between the TIC and the internal
standard peak. Response 1s determined using the total ion count over the
entire mass scanning range. A response factor of unity 1s assumed, since
historical Rfs are not usually available for TICs. Unfortunately, the total
ion peaks of the labeled compounds 1n many of these samples were completely
obscured by the very much larger TIC and PIC peaks, most notably benzene and
toluene. Thus, 1t was necessary to use an "external" I.S. total ion count,
taken from each sample's corresponding dally system blank. Since the system
blanks did not contain any native compounds, a "clean" I.S. signal could be
measured, against which the TICs 1n the samples were then quantHated.
B-163
-------
Calibration Standard Preparation Summary / Ash Grove Cement Kiln 9102R-6415
Compound / Nominal POHC Concentration
Concentration (ng/ul)
2.5
10
25 100 250
d6-Benzene
d4-1,2-Dichloroethane (d4-DCE)
d8-Toluene (d8-Tol)
Monochlorobenzene (MCB)
51.2 51.2 51.2 51.2 51.2 51.2
52.4 10.5 21 52.4 105 210
50.4 10.1 20.2 50.4 100.8 202
0 2.4 9.9 24.8 99.3 250
B-164
-------
Calibration Curve Summary / Ash Grove Cement Kiln 9102L-6415
VOST
1 1/8/89
Rfs ys de-Benzene
(total ng) d6
5
20
50
200
500
Average Rf:
RSD(%):
-Benzene
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
d4-DCE
.179
.198
.215
.220
.212
.205
8.1
d8-Toluene
.695
.824
.873
.893
.884
.834
9.8
MCB (11 2) by
.543
.661
.704
.746
.728
.676
12.0
MCB (114)5^
.118
.194
.215
.240
.240
.201
25.0
VOST
11 /a/89
Rfs vs d8-Toluene
Amount-^
(total ng) d6-
5
20
50 "
200
500
Average Rf:
RSD(%):
Response Factor (Rf)
Benzene
1.437
1.212
1.145
1.119
1.130
1.209
11.0
d4-DCE
.258
.240
.246
.246
.240
.246
3.0
d8-Toluene
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
MCB (11 2) W
.781
.802
.806
.835
.822
.809
2.5
MCB (114)£
.170
.235
.246
.269
.271
.238
17.2
VOST
11/10/89
High-Level Std.
Amount—'
{*««»' ng)
2000
Response Factor (Rf)
de-Benzene d4-DCE d8-Toluene MCB (112)V MCB
1.137
.239
1.000
.481
.237
Amount
VOST Condensate
(Purge-and-Trap)
11/13/89
Rfs vs dS-Benzene
(total ng) de-Benzene
5
20
50
200
500
Average Rf:
RSD(%):
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
1.000
d4-DCE
.188
.181
.174
.153
.190
.177
8.4
d8«Toluen*
.891
.945
1.010
.955
.904
.941
5.0
MCB (112)Jt/
.687
.832
.926
.853
.817
.823
10.5
MCB (114)5=
.229
.276
.265
.266
.259
8.0
Notes:
a
b.
c.
Standard amounts are shown as' nominal values. Exact concentrations of target
analytes are shown in the Calibration Standard Preparation Summary.
Quantitated using primary quantitation ion (m/z 112).
Quantitated using secondary quantitation ion (m/z 114).
B-165
-------
Standard and Blank Analysis Summary \ Ash Grove Cement Kiln 9102L-6415
VOST
POHC Amt
Amount (total ng)-
Variance
Date
1 1/9/89
11/10/89
1 1/13/89
11/14/89
11/15/89
(na)
0
so
0
50
0
2000
0
50
0
50
50
0
50
50
50
0
50
50
0
0
0
50
0
50
50
0
50
Description
Daily Blank
Daily Verification
Cleanup Blank
Shin Verification
Cleanup Blank
Daily Final Std.i/
Daily Blank
Daily Verification
Cleanup Blank
Shift Verification
Daily Final Std.
Daily Blank
- Daily Verification
Shift Verification
Daily Final Std.
Daily Blank
Daily Verification
Shift Verification
Cleanup Blank
Cleanup Blank
Cleanup Blank
Daily Final Std.
Daily Blank
Daily Verification
Shift Verification
Cleanup Blank
Daily Final Std.
d6-3enz
Std.
Std.
Std.
Std.
Std.
Std.
Std.
Std.
Std.
Std.
100
101
98
96
98
94
101
95
97
98
99
98
100
193
97
101
97
96
96
97
97
97
103
92
91
101
97
d4-OCE
102
102
97
96
98
97
100
96
95
94
99
93
95
186
94
96
92
92
89
90
93
98
100
90
90
99
93
MCB fe/ UCBZS d6-Benz
2
50
3
58
0
1190
0
51
3
49
52
0
47
46
55
0
46
49
1
0
0
49
0
47
44
4
48
0
52
3
62
0
1992
0
52
2
51
55
0
50
48
58
0
49
53
0
0
0
51
0
49
46
3
50
0
1
•2
-4
• 2
•6
1
•5
•3
•2
•1
•2
0
-3
•3
1
•3
-4
•4
-3
•3
•3
3
•8
-9
1
• 3
d4-DCE
2
2
•3
-4
• 2
-3
0
• 4
-5
-6
• 1
-7
•5
-7
-6
• 4
•8
-8
-1 1
-10
-7
•2
0
-10
-10
• 1
-7
MCB by
1
17
-41*
1
-2
5
• 6
-8
9
• 7
-2
•2
•6
-11
-3
MCB ft
5
24
0
5
2
9
• 1
-4
16
-2
6
1
-2
-8
0
VOST Condenser* (Purgi-and-Trap)
POHC Amt
Amount (total
Date (ng) Description d4-DCE
11/14/89
11/15/89
0
50
50
0
50
50
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
blank
verification std.
final std.
blank
verification std.
final std.
117
114
108
86
103
110
dB-Tol
99
100
105
107
103
87
ng)
MCBfe/
0
49
47
0
48
47
% Variance
MC8&"
0
45
43
0
45
48
d4-DCE
11
9
3
-18
• 1
5
d8-Tol
-2
0
4
6
2
-14
MCB:/
-1
-5
-3
-6
MCB <
-10
-14
-8
-3
Notes:
a
b.
c.
d
a.
Compounds quantltatad vs d8-toluane internal standard.
Amounts calculated using primary quantitation ion (m/z 112).
Amounts calculated using secondary quantitation ion (m/z 114).
This standard also served as an extended point for the 11/8/89 calibration curve.
Primary quantitation Ion was saturated at this level.
B-166
-------
VOST Analysis Summary / Ash Grove Cement Kiln 9201L-6415
MCS
% Recovery
No. Sample No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
21
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
1040
1041
1042
1043
1044
1045
1047
1048
1049
1050
1051
1054
1055
1056
1057
1058
1059
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
2051
2054
2055
2058
2059
3040
3041
3042
3043
3044
3045
3048
3049
3050
3051
Description
PR1TNX
PR1TC
PR2TNX
PR2TC
PR3TNX
PR3TC
PR1TC
TBTNX
TBTC
PR1TNX
PR1TC
PR3TNX
PR3TC
FBTNX
FBTC
TBTNX
TBTC
PR1TNX
PR1TC
PR2TNX
PR2TC
PR3TNX
PR3TC
FBTNX
FBTC
TBTNX
TBTC
PR1TNX
PR1TC
PR3TNX
PR3TC
TBTNX
TBTC
PR1 TNX iy
PR1TC
PR2TNX
PR2TC
PR3TNX */
PR3TC
TBTNX -
TBTC
PR1 TNX
PR1 TC £/
Amount (nq)s'
1011^
. s»J
1060 ^
-
681^
.
-
-
.
140
18
220
.
.
.
.
-
1278^
.
1331^
.
1540^
.
.
»
»
.
33
6
556 V
.
.
-
108
.
114
.
104
-
-
'
9
•
d6-Benzene
47
100
23
95
62
99
100
99
100
93
100
97
100
100
101
101
101
42
98
52
101
53
98
96
95
98
100
94
98
98
99
105
100
70
96
74
98
70
97
99
102
96
196
d4-DCI
144
100
104
.96
149
98
98
96
97
98
99
99
98
97
99
99
98
148
99
160
101
158
99
96
94
96
98
106
96
111
98
102
99
139
91
145
96
125
93
94
97
92
190
B-167
-------
VOST Analysis Summary / Ash Grove Cement Kiln 9201L-6415
No. Sample No
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
3052
3053
3054
3055
3056
3057
3058
3059
4040
4041
4044
4045
4048
4049
4050
4051
4054
4055
4058
4059
5040
5041
5044
5045
5048
5049
5050
5051
5054
5055
5058
5059
Description
PR2TNX
PR2TC
PR3TNX
PR3TC
FBTNX
FBTC
TBTNX
TBTC
PR1TNX
PR1TC
PR3TNX
PR3TC
TBTNX
TRBTC
PR1TNX
PR1TC
PR3TNX
PR3TC
TBTX
TBTC
PR1TNX
PR1TC
PR3TNX
PR3TNX
TBTNX
TCTC
PR1TNX
PR1TC
PR3TNX
PR3TC
TBTNX
TBTC
MCB
Amount (na)
9
-
6
-
-
-
-
-
1394 ^
.
1226^
-
-
-
11
.
.
-
.
'
1329^
.
1197^
.
.
.
23
.
6
-
.
-
% Recovery
d6-Benzene
98
101
97
99
138
135
97
169
61
96
64
96
95
97
93
98
96
98
96
107
64
97
64
96
96
104
103
164
94
129
93
160
d4-DC
94
97
92
103
130
129
93
170
126
94
127
94
93
93
90
98
94
98
94
103
132
95
133
95
94
102
110
176
92
131
90
159
Notes:
a. MCB amounts in excess of 500 ng were determined using a secondary ion (m/z 114).
b. All MCB amounts and surrogate recovery values were determined using d8-toluene
as the internal standard.
c. Not detected above the measured limit of quantitation. LOQ - 6 total ng of POHC.
d. VOST cartridge was received broken. The cartridge contents were transferred to a new
prior to analysis.
e. VOST cartridge cracked during heated purge. Internal standard (d8-toluene) response
was very low, resulting in artificially high surrogate recovery values.
B-168
-------
VOST Condensate Analysis Summary / Ash Grove Cement Kiln 9102L-6415
MCB Surrogate Recovery
No. Description Amount (mg/l) d4-DCE d8-Toluene
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1026
2026
2027
3026
3027
4026
4027
5026
5027
-J2/ 97
100
88
80
90
92
95
94
89
95 .
95
78
98
76
93
80
95
82
Notes:
a. Surrogate recovery determined relative to de-Benzene internal standard.
b. Not detected above the measured limit of quantitation. LOQ - 2.2 mg/l condensate.
B-169
-------
VOST Screen Analysis Summary / 9102-6415
CD
„
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Notes
a
b.
c.
d.
Compound !
TRICHLOROETHENE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE
TRK^fuORCfLUOROMETHANE
TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
1 ,1-DICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1 ,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
BENZENE^
1.2-DICHLOROETHANE
1 ,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROJODCHUORCIMETHAfE
2-CHLOROETHVLVINYL ETHER
CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TOLUENES*/
TRANS-1 ^DICHLOROPROPENE
1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
1 ,1 ,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYIBENZENE
BROMOFORM
DBFCMOCHLOFOMETHANE
ACETONE
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
DIETHYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
LJOQ^
14
23
20
50
18
11
12
26
28
4
22
10
13
22
7
5
51
13
14
8
10
14
12
65
49
10
8
37
1040k/ 1041
37
-
796 359
-
-
-
•
-
12418* 46 1
•
-
-
-
12066* 11 1
-
-
201
2159
-
-
•
-
-
-
1042 1043 1044 1045 1047 1048 1049 1050
29 - . - - - 23
--------
837 353 821 547 - - - 25
..--•"""
..--•---
64 -------
1283 ..-----
----- .--
9837* 33 10428* 100 11 11 19 508
2346 -------
..--- ...
392 -------
7745 -------
19 -------
7485* 21 10092* 6 - 26 7 509
. . - - - ..-
1562 -------
103 - 46 - - - - 44
25 -------
2354 - 1769 .... 43
------
88 -------
106
3333 -------
28 -------
-
124
1051 1054
38
"
** **
68
"
"
"
33 536
"
"
~ ~
™ ~
29 312
"
~ ™
21
46
" ~
-
-
~
" •
-
399
Limit of quantitation expressed in units of total ng/trap
Sample No.
* * quantitated using secondary ion
* a quantitated using secondary ion
(m/z 51)
(m/z 65)
-------
VOST Screen Analysis Summary / 9102-6415
Amount (Total ng)
No. Compound
1 TRICHLOROETHENE
2 1.1-DICHLOROETHENE
3 METHYLENECHLOR-DE
4 TRICHLOROFIJLX3ROMETHANE
5 TRANS-1.2-OICHLOROETHENE
6 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
7 CHJOROFORM
8 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
9 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
10 BENZENE*'
1 1 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
12 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
13 BRCMODCHLOROMETHANE
14 24»LOROETHYLV*NYL ETHER
oo 15 CIS-1.3-OICHLOROPROPENE
L 16 TOLUENE */
2 17 TRANS-1,3-OICHLOROPfK>PeNE
18 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
19 TETRACHLOROETHENE
20 1X2£-TETRACHLOROETHANE
21 ETHYLBENZENE
22 BROMQFORM
23 DBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
24 ACETONE
25 ACROLEIN
26 ACRYLONITRILE
27 DETHYLETHER
28 METHYL ETHYLKETONE
lOSSf 1056 1057 1058 1059 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045
20
-
1100 434 1175 535 1294 648
153 -------
.
39 ...
84
-
• ->>•-••• - . .
26 27 14 27 21 13938* 121 12342* 84 13018* 111
1062
.
........ 439
4651
7 ...
6 6 31 12521* 28 12062* 12 12726* 9
...........
1214
51 - 31 - 23
58 ...
2377 - 2263 - 2605
22
25
...........
8230
69
...........
2046
-
.
.
.
-
.
-
_
32
.
.
.
-
.
12
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
141
.
.
.
Notes:
a^ Sample No.
b./ ' » quanlitated using secondary ion (m/z 51)
c,x * " quaniitaied using secondary ion (m/z 65)
-------
VOST Screen Analysis Summary / 9102-6415
Amount (Total ng)
CO
IN)
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
g
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Compound
TRICHLOROETHENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENECHLORCE
TRICHLORORJUOROMETHANE
TRANS-1 ,2-DICHLOROETHENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1 ,1 ,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORKDE
BENZENE J"
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1 2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMOOCHLDROME7HANE
2-CHLOROETHYLVWYL ETHER
CIS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TOLUENE^/
TRANS-1 ,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
1 ,1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACHLOROETHENE
1,1 ,2.2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYIBENZENE
BROMORDRM
DBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
ACETONE
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRH-E
DIETHYL ETHER
METHYL ETHYL KETONE
2047^ 2048
-
44
63
-
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
-
-
-
63
-
-
-
-
.
-
-
167
-
-
-
2049 2050
20
-
37
-
-
-
-
-
-
22 1081*
-
-
-
-
-
8 390
-
-
33
-
48
-
-
'
-
-
-
324
2051 2054
16 15
-
26
-
.
•
-
-
-
53 1285*
-
-
-
-
-
47 374
-
-
24
-
71
-
-
-
-
-
-
2055 2058 2059 3040
44
.
8949
61 - - 1303
-
43
.
31
36
46 26 13 10155*
660
-
1174
-
-
6 - 7 9748*
-
746
57
13
1411
- ...
48
-
2505
461
-
46
3041
-
223
56
.
-
-
-
.
199
-
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
.
33
.
.
.
_
344
22
.
3042
-
886
70
.
50
1346
-
.
9770*
537
-
375
3865
-
10570*
-
948
.
.
1747
.
.
.
3809
28
.
Notes:
ay Sample No.
hy * = quantitated using secondary ion (m/z 51)
c./ * • quantitated using secondary ion (m/z 65)
-------
VOST Screen Analysis Summary / 9102-6415
DO
I
No. Compound
1 TRICHLOROETHENE
2 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
3 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
4 TnX>LOROFLUOROMETHANE
5 TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
6 1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
7 CHLOROFORM
8 1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
9 CARBON TETRACHLORIDE
10 BENZENE&/ .
1 1 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
12 1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
13 BROMOOtCHLOROMETHANE
14 2-CHLOROETHYLVWYL ETHER
15 CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
16 TOLUENE^
17 TRANS-1>DICHLOROPROPENE
IB 1 .1 ,2-TRICHLOROE7HANE
19 TETRACHLOROETHENE
20 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
21 ETHYLBENZENE
22 BROMORDPM
23 DBROMXHLOROMETHANE
24 ACETONE
25 ACnOLEIN
26 ACRYLONITHIE
27 DETHYLEtHER
28 METHYL ETHYL KETONE
Notes:
a, Sample No.
3043 4/ 3044 3045 3048
92
.
245 1397 148 51
108 81
.
55
20 1101
.
.
310 9039* 487 25
496
.
1347
.
.
11 9317' 11 7
347
805
37
56 25 -
1610
18
.
.
3564
15
.
3049 3050 3051
K • •
29
115 399
68
23
...
.
.
-
50 121 396
.
-
.
.
.
16 135
.
-
21
.
30
.
-
258
50
.
.
3052 3053 3054
16
30 - 39
1668 42 187
159 87 55
24 - 31
-
.
36 - 41
.
176 61 75
-
- .
•
.
-
201 - 96
.
» •
16
.
20
* • -
.
.
-
.
-
3055 3056
.
-
97 38
64
-
• •
•
-
• •
18 7
" *
™ ~
" ~
* ~
" *
9
"
" "
•
*
-
~ ~
-
241 138
-
-
-
jx, * m quantitated using secondary ion (m/z 51)
c,/ * - quantitated using secondary ion (m/z 65)
-------
VOST Screen Analysis Summary / 9102-6415
Amount (Total ng)
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
a, 1S
,L 16
•^ 17
-p»
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Compound 3057f/ 3058
TRICHLOROETHENE
1.1-DICHLOROETHENE
METHYLENE CHLORIDE - 190
TRICHLOROaUOROMETHANE
TRANS-1.2-DICHLOHOETHENE
1,1-DICHLOROETHANE
CHLOROFORM
1 ,1 ,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
CARBON TETRACHLORDE
BENZENE^ - 37
1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
1.2-DICHLOROPROPANE
BROMOCMOHLOROMETHANE
2-CHLOROETHYLVWYL ETHER
CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
TOLUENE ±S • 34
TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENI
1 ,1 ,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
TETRACH_OROETHENE
1,1.2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE
ETHYLBENZENE
BROMOFORM
rJBROMOCHLOROMETHANE
ACETONE
ACROLEIN
ACRYLONITRILE
DIETHYL ETHER
METHYLETHYLKETONE
3059 4040
.
-
143 822
-
-
25
-
-
-
24 10272*
748
-
945
-
-
- 9691*
-
918
-
-
1766
-
-
-
5579
18
-
4041 4044 4045 4048 4049 4050 4051
. .
245 676 384 179 57 76 89
.
-
21
39 - 76
.
-
87 9382* 107 33 10 98 80
599
-
996 .....
-
-
- 9027* 12 15 11 135 13
278
853 .....
26
12
1607
•
-
....
462 - 1531 ....
10 14 32
-------
4054
.
.
.
-
-
.
-
.
47
.
.
.
.
-
63
-
-
.
.
.
_
.
.
.
.
.
Notes:
ay Sample No.
£j * » quantltated using secondary Ion (m/z 51)
cj ' = quanlitated using secondary ion (m/z 65)
-------
VOST Screen Analysis Summary / 9102-6415
Amount (Total ng)
in
No. Compound 4055^/ 4058
1 TRICHLOROETHENE
2 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
3 METHYLJENE CHLORIDE - 74
4 TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE
5 TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
6 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
7 CHJOROPDRM
8 1,1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
9 CARBON TETRACHLORDE
10 BENZENE f 39 25
11 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
12 1.2 DICHLOROPROPANE
13 BRCIMOOCHUOROMETHANE
14 2-CHLOROETHYLVNYL ETHER
15 CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
16 TOLUENE*/ - 7
17 TRANS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
18 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE
19 TETRACHbOROETHENE
20 1.1A2-TETRACHLORbETHANE
21 ETHYLBENZENE - -
22 BROMDFORM
23 D6ROMOCHLOROMETHANE
24 ACETONE - -
25 ACROLEIN
28 ACRYLONITRILE
27 DETHYLETHER
28 METHYL ETHYLKETONE
Notes:
a/ Sample No.
b^ * = quantilated using secondary Ion (m/z 51)
c,j ' - quantitated using secondary Ion (m/z 65)
4059 5040
.
.
86 846
.
.
34
-
-
35 9178*
624
.
1264
.
10 9137*
.
915
.
16
1630
.
.
.
5019
42
.
5041 5044 5045 5048 5049 5050 5051
.......
596 853 332 519 - 121 114
71 ...
.......
30 - ...
46 - 35 -
.......
115 9018* 110 35 16 204
601 -----
.......
932 . , .
95
- - - 25
42 8786* 7 28 - 207
254 .....
858 .....
26
20 26 - 19
1527 - - - 38 -
.----.-
.......
----...
702 - 316 ....
27 38 - 32
.......
5054
_
43
.
_
.
.
.
114
.
.
.
46
18
110
.
.
„
.
12
.
.
_
.
12
.
-------
DO
I
en
VOST Screen Analysis Summary / 9102-6415
Amount (Total ng)
No. Compound
5058 5059
1 TRICHLOROETHENE
2 1,1-DICHLOROETHENE
3 METHYLENE CHLORIDE
4 TfllCHLORC>FLUOROMETHANE
5 TRANS-1.2-DICHLOROETHENE
6 1.1-DICHLOROETHANE
7 CHLOROFORM
8 1.1,1-TRICHLOROETHANE
9 CARBON TETRACH-ORDE
10 BENZENE*"
11 1,2-DICHLOROETHANE
12 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE
13 BROMCIDICHLOROMETHAhE
14 2-CHLOROETHYLVNYL ETHER
15 CIS-1.3-DICHLOROPROPENE
16 TOLUENE*'
17 TRANS-1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE
18 1.1.2-TRICHLOROETHANE
19 TETRACHLOROETHENE
20 1.1.2^-TETRACHLOROETHANE
21 ETHVLBENZEhE
22 BROMORORM
23 DBROMOCHLOROMETI^hE
24 ACETONE
25 ACROLEIN
26 ACRYLONITRILE
27 DETHYL ETHER
28 METHYL ETHYLKETONE
21 58
52
26 37
Notes:
Sample No.
* = quantitated using secondary Ion (m/z 51)
* - quantitated using secondary Ion (m/z 65)
-------
Cement Kiln Semi-Quantitative Screen Target List
acetone
acrolein
acrylonitrile
benzene
bromodichloromethane
bromoform
carbon tetrachloride
2-chloroethyl-vinyl ether
chloroform
dibromochloromethane
1,1-dichloroe thane
1,2-dichloroe thane
1,1-dichloroethene
t-l,2-dichloroethene
1,2-dichloropropane
t-l,3-dichloropropene
c- 1,3-dichloropropene
diethyl ether
ethylbenzene
methylene chloride
methyl ethyl ketone
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
tetrachloroethene
toluene
1,1,1-trichloroethane
1,1,2-trichloroethane
trichloroethene
trichlorofluoromethane
Method 1624 Target. Annlyf^p Not a»1«rfad for Kiln
chloromethane
bromomethane
chloroethane
vinyl chloride
p-dioxane
chlorobenzene (POHC)
B-177
-------
VOLATILE PICs
MAIN DUCT RUN #1
CONCEN- EMISSION
TRATION RATE
COMPOUND (ng/L) (mg/min)
Acetone
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene 598.64 874.01
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Carbon Tetrachloride
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
Chloroform
Dibromochloromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 , 1 -Dichloroethene
Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
CIS-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Diethyl Ether
Ethylbenzene 102.28 149.33
Methylene Chloride 65.72 95.95
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene 6.43 9.39
Toluene 577.75 843.52
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene 0.97 1 .42
Trichlorofluoromethane
RUN #2
CONCEN- EMISSION
TRATION RATE
(ng/L) (mg/min)
696.94 1019.63
•
0.55 0.81
. 127.74 186.89
89.17 130.45
1.48 2.17
1 .90 2.78
648.62 948.94
RUN #3
CONCEN- EMISSION
TRATION RATE
(ng/L) (mg/min)
487.18 727.37
74.04 110.54
262.64 392.13
2.31 3.45
468.16 698.97
3.34 4.98
35.25 52.63
RUN #4
CONCEN- EMISSION
TRATION RATE
(ng/L) (mg/min)
501 .08 757.64
85.18 128.79
53.70 81.19
473.21 715.49
RUN #5
CONCEN- EMISSION
TRATION RATE
(ng/L) (mg/min)
448.00 677.37
76.78 116.09
63.89 96.60
437.39 661.34
00
I
oo
-------
VOLATILE PICs
BYPASS DUCT
COMPOUND
Acetone
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Carbon Tetrachloride
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
Chloroform
Dibromochloromethane
1 .1 -Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
CIS-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Diethyl Ether
Ethylbenzene
Methylene Chloride
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,1.1-Trichloroethane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane
RUN
CONCEN-
TRATION
(ng/L)
28.43
2.28
0.65
67.68
1.67
21.87
1.57
1.75
#1
EMISSION
RATE
(mg/min)
20.24
1.63
0.46
48.19
1.19
15.57
1.12
1.24
RUN #2
CONCEN- EMISSION
TRATION RATE
(ng/L) (mg/min)
62.87 42.00
3.04 2.03
1.60 1.07
1.44 0.96
20.82 13.91
1.29 0.86
1.55 1.04
RUN
CONCEN-
TRATION
(ng/L)
60.75
16.64
1.66
1.21
16.64
0.50
5.85
1 01
4.53
#3
EMISSION
RATE
(mg/min)
42.16
11.55
1.15
0.84
11.55
0.35
4.06
0.70
3.14
RUN #4
CONCEN- EMISSION
TRATION RATE
(ng/L) (mg/min)
6.66 4.57
4.15 2.85
0.66 0.45
5.33 3.66
RUN
CONCEN-
TRATION
(ng/L)
8.67
1.27
7.54
0.73
0.65
7.97
#5
EMISSION
RATE
(mg/min)
5.96
0.87
5.18
0.50
0.44
5.47
1.32 0.91
oo
i
10
Shaded values may be impacted by blank data values.
-------
RUN#1
MAIN DUCT
Pain Sample Vol 19.2 L
Pair 3 Sample Vol 19.1 L
Total Sample Vol 38.4 L
Stack flow rate 1460 dscm/min
Amount Detected (ng)
Trip Blk
Compound T TIC
Trichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroetnene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene 11 19
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
CIS-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene 26 7
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Bromoform
Dibromochloromethane
Acetone 529
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Diethyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Pairl
T T/C
37
796 359
12415 46
12072 11
201
2159
Pairs
T T/C
821 547
10426 100
10097 6
46
1769
Total
Amount
(ng)'
37
2524
22988
22186
247
3928
Average
cone
(ng/L or
ug/dscm)
0.97
65.72
598.64
577.75
6.43
102.28
Analyte
Emission
rate
(mg/min)
1.42
95.95
874.01
843.52
9.39
149.33
* SUM OF TWO PAIRS'
B-180
-------
MAIN DUCT
pair 1 Sample Vol
Pair 3 Sample Vol
Total Sample Vol
stack flow rate
RUN #2
19.5 L
19.5 L
39 L
1463 dscm/min
compound
Trichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1 1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2-Oichloroethane
1 'a-Dichloropropane
Brornodichloromethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
ClS-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1 1(2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 (i ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
gtrtylbenzene
grornoform
pibromochloromethane
Acetone
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
piethyl Ether
Metnyl Ethyl Ketone
Amount Detected (ng)
Reid Blk
T T/C
32
12 5
707
Trip Blk
T T/C
44
63
11 22
63 8
835
Pairl
T T/C
1101 434
13935 121
12527 28
•
51
58
2377
22
Pair 3
T T/C
1294 648
13015 110
12732 9
23
2605
Total
Amount
(ng)*
3478
0
27181
25296
74
58
4982
22
Average
cone
ng/L or
ug/dscm)
89.17
0.00
0.00
696.94
648.62
1.90
1.48
127.74
0.55
Analyte
Emission
rate
(mg/min)
130.45
0.00
0.00
1019.63
948.94
2.78
2.17
186.89
0.81
SUM OF TWO PAIRS
B-181
-------
RUN #3
MAIN DUCT
Pair 1 Sample Vol 20.4 L
Pair 3 Sample Vol 20.3 L
Total Sample Vol 40.8 L
Stack flow rate 1493 dscm/min
Compound
Trichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1,1,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
B romodichloromethane
2-Chloroethylvlnyl Ether
CIS-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1,1.2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Bromoform
D ibromochloromethane
Acetone
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Diethyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Amount Detected (ng)
Trip Blk
T T/C
51 115
25 50
7 16
Pain
T T/C
44
8949 223
1303 55
10153 199
9753 16
57
1411
Pairs
T T/C
92
1397 148
81
9038 487
9322 11
37
1610
Total
Amount
(ng)"
136
10716
1438
19877
19101
94
3021
Average
cone
(ng/L or
ug/dscm)
3.34
262.64
35.25
487.18
468.16
2.31
74.04
Analyte
Emission
rate
(mg/min)
4.98
392.13
52.63
727.37
698.97
3.45
110.54
•SUM OF TWO PAIRS
B-182
-------
RUN #4
MAIN DUCT
Pain Sample Vol 20.0 L
Pair 3 Sample Vol 19.6 L
Total Sample Vol 39.6 L
Stack flow rate 1512 dscm/rnjn ,
Compound
Trichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trans-1 ,2-Dlchloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1,1,1-Tricnloroethane
Carbon Tetrachlorlde
Benzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-Chloroethylvlnyl Ether
ClS-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
Trans-1 ,3-Dlchloropropene
1 ,1 ,2-TrIchloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 .1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Bromoform
Dibromochloromethane
Acetone
Acroleln
Acrylonitrlle
Diethyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Amount Detected (ng)
Trip Blk
T T/C
179 57
33 10
15 11
Pain
T T/C
822 245
10270 87
,
9696
;1766
Pair 3
T T/C
676 384
9379 107
9032 11
1607
Total
Amount
(ng)"
2126
19843
18739
3373
Average
cone
(ng/L or
ug/dscm)
53.70
000
W» wW
501.08
473.21
85.18
Analyte
Emission
rate
(mg/mln)
81.19
0.00
757.64
715.49
128.79
•SUM OF TWO PAIRS
B-183
-------
MAIN DUCT
Pair 1 Sample Vol
Pair 3 Sample Vol
Total Sample Vol
Stack flow rate
RUN #5
20.7 L
20.4 L
41.1 L
1512 dscm/min
Compound
Trichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Oichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
CIS-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Bromoform
D ibromochloromethane
Acetone
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Diethyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Amo
Trip Blk
T T/C
519
71
35 16
28 2
unt Detected (i
Pain
T T/C
846 596
9176 115
9142 41
1630
ig)
Pair 3
T T/C
853 332
9016 110
8791 7
1527
Total
Amount
(ng>*
2626
18417
17981
3156
Average
cone
(ng/L or
ug/dscm)
63.89
448.00
437.39
76.78
Analyte
Emission
rate
(mg/min)
96.60
677.37
661.34
116.09
SUM OF TWO PAIRS
B-1B4
-------
RUN#1
BYPASS DUCT
pain Sample Vol 19.5 L
Pair 3 Sample Vol 19.3 L
Total Sample Vol 38.8 L
.Stack flow rate 712 dscm/min
.Compound
Trichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1.1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1 .1 ,1 -Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1 .2-Dichloroethane
1 .2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
CIS-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1 .1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 .1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Bromoform
Dibromochloromethane
Acetone
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
°iethyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Amount Detected (ng)
Reid Blk
T T/C
26 14
6 6
Trip Blk
T T/C
153
27 21
31
Pairl
T T/C
23 38
• rf
* 25
68
508 33
509 29
44
43
623
Pair3
T T/C
536 26
312
21
46
2005
Total
Amount
(ng)*
61
25
68
1104
849
65
89
2628
Average
cone
(ng/L or
ug/dscm)
1.57
0.65
1.75
28.43
21.87
1.67
2.28
67.68
Analyte
Emission
rate
(mg/min)
1.12
0.46
1.24
20.24
15.57
1.19
1.63
48.19
*Sum of Pair 1 & 2.
B-185
-------
BYPASS DUCT
Pair 1 Sample Vol
Pair 3 Sample Vol
Total Sample Vol
Stack flow rate
RUN #2
19.7 L
19.5 L
39.2 L
668 dscm/min
Compound
Trichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
CIS-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Bromoform
Dibromochloromethane
Acetone
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Diethyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Amount Detected (ng
Trip Blk
T T/C
26 13
7
Pain
T T/C
20 16
37
1081 53
390 47
32
48
1628
)
Pair 3
T T/C
15
26
61
1284 46
373 6
24
71
Total
Amount
(no)*
51
63
61
2464
816
56
119
1628
Average
cone
(ng/L or
ug/dscm)
1.29
1.60
1.55
62.87
20.82
0.00
1.44
3.04
Analyte
Emission
rate
(mg/min)
0.86
1.07
1.04
42.00
13.91
0.00
0.96
2.03
SUM OF TWO PAIRS
B-186
-------
RUN #3
BYPASS DUCT
Pair 1 Sample Vol
Pair 3 Sample Vol
Total Sample Vol
20.6
20.4
41.1
694 dscm/min
.Compound
Trichloroethene
1»l-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1-1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1.i,l-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1 .2-Dichloroethane
1 >2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
ClS-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
Trans-l ,3-Dichloropropene
1 .1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 -1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Bromoform
Dibromochloromethane
Acetone
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Djethyl Ether
^ethyl Ethyl Ketone
Amount Detected (ng)
Field Blk
T T/C
38
7
688
Trip Blk
T T/C
95 143
19 24
17
Pairl
T T/C
29
399
68
121 396
135
21
30
1292
Pair3
T T/C
39
187 97
55 64
41
75 18
96 9
20
1203
Total
Amount
(ng)*
68
684
186
41
609
240
21
50
2495
Average
cone
(ng/L or
ug/dscm)
1.66
16.64
4.53
1.01
14.83
5.85
0.50
1.21
60.75
Analyte
Emission
rate
(mg/min)
1.15
11.55
3.14
0.70
10.29
4.06
0.35
0.84
42.16
•SUM OF TWO PAIRS
B-187
-------
BYPASS DUCT
Pair 1 Sample Vol
Pair 3 Sample Vol
Total Sample Vol
Stack flow rate
RUN #4
20.0 L
19.6 L
39.7 L
687 dscm/min
Compound
Trichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Dichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-Chloroethylvinyl Ether
CIS-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
Trans- 1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Bromoform
Dibromochloromethane
Acetone
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Diethyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Amount Detected (ng)
Trip Blk
T TIC
74 86
25 35
7 10
Pain
T T/C
76 89
98 80
135 13
26
Pair3
T T/C
47 39
63
Total
Amount
(ng)*
165
264
212
26
Average
cone
(ng/L or
ug/dscm)
4.15
6.66
5.33
0.66
Analyte
Emission
rate
(mg/min)
2.85
4.57
3.66
0.45
•SUM OF TWO PAIRS
B-188
-------
RUN #5
BYPASS DUCT
Pair 1 Sample Vol 20.0 L
Pair 3 Sample Vot 19.6 L
Total Sample Vol 39.7 L
Stack flow rate 687 dscm/min
Compound
Trichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethene
Methylene Chloride
Trichlorofluoromethane
Trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethene
1,1-Dichloroethane
Chloroform
1 ,1 ,1-Trichloroethane
Carbon Tetrachloride
Benzene
1 ,2-Dichloroethane
1 ,2-Oichloropropane
Bromodichloromethane
2-Chloroethylvlnyl Ether
CIS-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
Toluene
Trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene
1 ,1 ,2-Trichloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
1 ,1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Ethylbenzene
Bromoform
Dibromochloromethane
Acetone
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Diethyl Ether
Methyl Ethyl Ketone
Amount Detected (ng)
Trip Blk
T T/C
58
37
Pain
T T/C
121 114
204
207
26
38
Pair 3
T T/C
43 21
52
114 26
110
12
29
Total
Amount
(ngr
299
52
344
316
26
51
29
Average
cone
ng/L or
ug/dscm)
7.54
1.32
8.67
7.97
0.65
1.27
0.73
Analyte
Emission
rate
(mg/min)
5.18
0.91
5.96
5.47
0.44
0.87
0.50
•SUM OF TWO PAIRS
B-189
-------
BLANK TRAP DATA RANGES
Compound RANGE (ng)
(LOW) (HIGH)
' ACENAPHTHYLENE 140
ALKENE
ALKYLATED HYDROCARBON
BENZALDEHYDE 16 821
BENZONITRILE 16 1540
"2-BUTANONE 10 24
BUTENE/2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
CARBON DIOXIDE 24 89
CARBON DISULFIDE 74
DECANSE
* DIBENZOFURAN 86
1,1-DIMETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
DIMETHYL HEPTENE
ETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
ETHYLENIMINE
* 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE 16
* HEPTANE 29
1-HEPTANOL
1-HEPTENE
HEXANE 10 85
1-HEXENE
ISOCYANOMETHANE 90 280
KETONE 209
3-METHYLENE-PENTANE
3-METHYLHEXANE 13 71
2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
NAPHTHALENE 33
* OXYBISMEHANE 18
2-PENTENE
1-PHENYLETHANONE 48 411
2-PROPENENITRIL
2-PROPYL-1 -HEPTANOL
TETRAHYDROFURAN 100
TRIDECANE
2,3,4-TRIMETHYLHEXANE
• 1,3,6-TRIOXOCANE 47
4-UNDECENE
XYLENE
0-XYLENE
* Detected only in blank traps.
Blank ranges determined using total (T + TIC)
data values. Field blank data and trip blank
data were used as separate data points.
B-190
-------
NON-LISTED V-PICs
MAIN DUCT RUN #1
Compound
* ACENAPHTHYLENE
ALKENE
ALKYLATED HYDROCARBON
BENZALDEHYDE
BENZONITRILE
• 2-BUTANONE
BUTENE/2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON DISULFIDE
DECANSE
* DIBENZOFURAN
1 ,1-DIMETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
DIMETHYL HEPTENE
ETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
ETHYLENIMINE
* 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE
- HEPTANE
1-HEPTANOL
1 -HEPTENE
HEXANE
1-HEXENE
ISOCYANOMETHANE
KETONE
3-METHYLENE-PENTANE
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
NAPHTHALENE
* OXYBISMEHANE
2-PENTENE
1-PHENYLETHANONE
2-PROPENENITRIL
2-PROPYL-1 -HEPTANOL
TETRAHYDROFURAN
TRIDECANE
2,3,4-TRIMETHYLHEXANE
• 1,3,6-TRIOXOCANE
4-UNDECENE
XYLENE
o-XYLENE
PAIR #1
T T/C
1040 1041
390
690
3300
500
800
1000
1422
2400 359
6100
4796 46
PAIR #3
T T/C
1044 1045
274
207
460
900
1200
1400
4200
3000
2200
5600
TrpBlk
T T/C
048 1049
140
47 87
190 340
86
36 54
33
35 56
TOTAL
(ng)
274.00
207.00
850.00
1590.00
3300.00
1200.00
1900.00
800.00
4200.00
3000.00
3200.00
1422.00
2758.90
11700.00
4842.30
AVERAG
CONC.
(ng/L)
7.14
5.39
22.14
41.41
85.94
31.25
49.48
20.83
109.38
78.13
83.33
37.03
71.85
304.69
126.10
EMISSION
RATE
(mg/min)
10.42
7.87
32.32
60.45
125.47
45.63
72.24
30.42
159.69
114.06
121.67
54.07
104.90
444.84
184.11
* Detected only in blank traps
Shaded : data may be impacted by blank data values.
B-191
-------
NON-LISTED V-PICs
MAIN DUCT RUN #2
Compound
• ACENAPHTHYLENE
ALKENE
ALKYLATED HYDROCARBON
BENZALDEHYDE
BENZONITRILE
• 2-BUTANONE
BUTENE/2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON DISULRDE
DECANSE
* DIBENZOFURAN
1 ,1-DIMETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
DIMETHYL HEPTENE
ETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
ETHYLENIMINE
* 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE
* HEPTANE
1-HEPTANOL
1 -HEPTENE
HEXANE
1-HEXENE
ISOCYANOMETHANE
KETONE
3-METHYLENE-PENTANE
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
NAPHTHALENE
• OXYBISMEHANE
2-PENTENE
1-PHENYLETHANONE
2-PROPENENITRIL
2-PROPYL-1 -HEPTANOL
TETRAHYDROFURAN
TRIDECANE
2,3,4-TRIMETHYLHEXANE
* 1 ,3,6-TRIOXOCANE
4-UNDECENE
XYLENE
0-XYLENE
PAIR #1
T T/C
2040 2041
280
780
4458
880
3800
3100
1600
460
5600
PAIR #3
T T/C
2044 2045
2580
520
580
1500
5500
3500
2800
950
4700
FldBlk
T T/C
2046 2047
23 40
TrpBlk
T T/C
2048 2049
23 40
26
TOTAL
(ng)
2580.0
800.0
1360.0
4458.0
2380.0
5500.0
7300.0
3100.0
, 4400.0
1410.0
10300.0
AVE.
CONC.
(ng/L)
66.2
20.5
34.9
114.3
61.0
141.0
187.2
79.5
112.8
36.2
264.1
EMISS.
RATE
(mg/min)
96.8
30.0
51.0
167.2
89.3
206.3
273.8
116.3
165.1
52.9
386.4
* Detected only in blank traps
B-192
-------
NON-LISTED V-PICs
MAIN DUCT RUN #3
Compound
* ACENAPHTHYLENE
ALKENE
ALKYLATED HYDROCARBON
BENZALDEHYDE
BENZONITRILE
* 2-BUTANONE
BUTENE/2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON DISULFIDE
DECANSE
* DIBENZOFURAN
1 ,1-DIMETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
DIMETHYL HEPTENE
ETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
ETHYLENIMINE
• 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE
• HEPTANE
1-HEPTANOL
1 -HEPTENE
HEXANE
1-HEXENE
ISOCYANOMETHANE
KETONE
3-METHYLENE-PENTANE
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHYL-1 -PROPENE
NAPHTHALENE
* OXYBISMEHANE
2-PENTENE
1-PHENYLETHANONE
2-PROPENENITRIL
2-PROPYL-1 -HEPTANOL
TETRAHYDROFURAN
TRIDECANE
2 3,4-TRIMETHYLHEXANE
• 1,3,6-TRIOXOCANE
4-UNDECENE
XYLENE
0-XYLENE
PAIR #1
T T/C
3040 3041
460
240
3300
3100
4500
1800
160
3600
PAIR #3
T T/C
3044 3045
450
350
530
3000
2800
2000
240
3600
TrpBlk
T T/C
3048 3049
120 210
44 84
24
25
78 96
TOTAL
(ng)
450.00
350.00
990.00
240.00
3300.00
3100.00
7500.00
2800.00
3800.00
160.00
240.00
7200.00
AVE.
CONC.
(ng/L)
11.03
8.58
24.26
5.88
80.88
75.98
183.82
68.63
93.14
3.92
5.88
176.47
EMISS.
RATE
mg/min)
16.47
12.81
36.23
8.78
120.76
113.44
274.45
102.46
139.05
5.85
8.78
263.47
* Detected bnly in blank traps
Shaded : data may be impacted by blank data values.
B-193
-------
NON-LISTED V-PICs
MAIN DUCT RUN #4
Compound
* ACENAPHTHYLENE
ALKENE
ALKYLATED HYDROCARBON
BENZALOEHYDE
BENZONITRILE
* 2-BUTANONE
BUTENE/2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON DISULFIDE
DECANSE
* DIBENZOFURAN
1 ,1 -DIMETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
DIMETHYL HEPTENE
ETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
ETHYLENIMINE
* 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE
* HEPTANE
1-HEPTANOL
1-HEPTENE
HEXANE
1-HEXENE
ISOCYANOMETHANE
KETONE
3-METHYLENE-PENTANE
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
NAPHTHALENE
* OXYBISMEHANE
2-PENTENE
1-PHENYLETHANONE
2-PROPENENITRIL
2-PROPYL-1-HEPTANOL
TETRAHYDROFURAN
TRIDECANE
2,3,4-TRIMETHYLHEXANE
* 1 .3,6-TRIOXOCANE
4-UNDECENE
XYLENE
0-XYLENE
PAIR #1
T TIC
4040 4041
520
670
430
3000
1500
3300 270
3700
PAIR #3
T T/C
4044 4045
340
730
1300
3600
2900
2400
1500
3600
TrpBlk
T T/C
4048 4049
250 510
440 1100
280
59 150
57
TOTAL
(ng)
860.00
1400.00
1730.00
3600.00
5900.00
3900.00
5070.00
7300.00
AVE.
CONC.
(ng/L)
21.72
35.35
43.69
90.91
148.99
98.48
128.03
184.34
EMISS.
RATE
(mg/min)
32.84
53.45
66.05
137.45
225.27
148.91
193.58
278.73
* Detected only in blank traps
B-194
-------
NON-LISTED V-PICs
MAIN DUCT RUN #5
Compound
- ACENAPHTHYLENE
ALKENE
ALKYLATED HYDROCARBON
BENZALDEHYDE
BENZONITRILE
- 2-BUTANONE
BUTENE/2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON DISULFIDE
DECANSE
* DIBENZOFURAN
1 ,1-DIMETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
DIMETHYL HEPTENE
ETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
gTHYLENIMINE
• 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE
• HEPTANE
1-HEPTANOL
1 -HEPTENE
HEXANE
1-HEXENE
ISOCYANOMETHANE
KETONE
3-METHYLENE-PENTANE
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
ISIAPHTHALENE
• OXYBISMEHANE
2-PENTENE
1-PHENYLETHANONE
2-PROPENENITRIL
2-PROPYL-1 -HEPTANOL
tETRAHYDROFURAN
TRIDECANE
2,3,4-TRIMETHYLHEXANE
• 1,3,6-TRIOXOCANE
4-UNDECENE
XYLENE
0-XYLENE
PAIR #1
T T/C
5040 5041
690
870
1000
4100
2500
3600 470
4200
PAIR #3
T T/C
5044 5045
470
540
480
480
4200
1600
3200
3800
TrpBlk
T T/C
5048 5049
31 790
320
.
85
71
51 360
47
TOTAL
(ng)
470.00
1230.00
1350.00
1480.00
8300.00
4100.00
4070.00
3200.00
8000.00
AVE.
CONC.
(ng/L)
11.44
29.93
32.85
36.01
201.95
99.76
99.03
77.86
194.65
EMISS.
RATE
mg/min)
17.29
45.25
49.66
54.45
305.34
150.83
149.73
117.72
294.31
* Detected only in blank traps
B-195
-------
NON-LISTED V-PICs
BYPASS DUCT RUN #1
Compound
* ACENAPHTHYLENE
ALKENE
ALKYLATED HYDROCARBON
BENZALDEHYDE
BENZONITRILE
* 2-BUTANONE
BUTENE/2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON DISULFIDE
DECANSE
* DIBENZOFURAN
1 ,1-DIMETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
DIMETHYL HEPTENE
ETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
ETHYLENIMINE
* 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE
* HEPTANE
1-HEPTANOL
1 -HEPTENE
HEXANE
1-HEXENE
ISOCYANOMETHANE
KETONE
3-METHYLENE-PENTANE
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
NAPHTHALENE
* OXYBISMEHANE
2-PENTENE
1-PHENYLETHANONE
2-PROPENENITRIL
2-PROPYL-1 -HEPTANOL
TETRAHYDROFURAN
TRIDECANE
2,3,4-TRIMETHYLHEXANE
* 1,3,6-TRIOXOCANE •
4-UNDECENE
XYLENE
o-XYLENE
PAIR #\
T T/C
1050 1051
170
11
260
110
220 17
420
33
PAIR #3
T T/C
1054 1055
210 35
220
160
230
37
25
FldBlk
T T/C
1056 1057
16
47 60
22 48
TrpBlk
T T/C
1058 1059
18 36
22 43
16
TOTAL
(ng)
170.00
256.00
480.00
270.00
237.00
650.00
70.00
25.00
AVE.
CONC.
(ng/L)
4.38
&60
12.37
6.96
6.11
16.75
1.80
0.64
EMISS.
RATE
[mg/min)
3.12
4.70
8.81
4.95
•
4.35
11.93
1.28
0.46
* Detected only In blank traps
Shaded : data may be impacted by blank data values.
B-196
-------
NON-LISTED V-PICs
BYPASS DUCT RUN #2
Compound
• ACENAPHTHYLENE
ALKENE
ALKYLATED HYDROCARBON
BENZALDEHYDE
BENZONITRILE
" 2-BUTANONE
BUTENE/2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON DISULFIDE
DECANSE
* DIBENZOFURAN
1 ,1 -DIMETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
DIMETHYL HEPTENE
ETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
ETHYLENIMINE
* 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE
* HEPTANE
1-HEPTANOL
1 -HEPTENE
HEXANE
1-HEXENE
ISOCYANOMETHANE
KETONE
3-METHYLENE-PENTANE
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
NAPHTHALENE
* OXYBISMEHANE
2-PENTENE
1-PHENYLETHANONE
2-PROPENENITRIL
2-PROPYL-1 -HEPTANOL
TETRAHYDROFURAN
TRIDECANE
2,3,4-TRIMETHYLHEXANE
* 1 ,3,6-TRIOXOCANE
4-UNDECENE
XYLENE
0-XYLENE
PAIR #1
T T/C
2050 2051
370
160
560
740
230
370
430
TrpBlk
T T/C
2058 2059
24
30 45
18
100
TOTAL
(ng)
370
160
560
740
230
370
AVERAG
CONC.
(ng/L)
9.44
4.08
14.29
18.88
5.87
9.44
EMISSIO
RATE
(mg/min)
6.31
2.73
9.54
12.61
3.92
6.31
'Detected only In blank traps
Shaded : data may be impacted by blank data valu i;
B-197
-------
NON-LISTED V-PICs
BYPASS DUCT RUN #3
Compound
* ACENAPHTHYLENE
ALKENE
ALKYLATED HYDROCARBON
BENZALDEHYDE
BENZONITRILE
* 2-BUTANONE
BUTENB2-METHYL-1 -PROPENE
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON DISULFIDE
DECANSE
* DIBEN2OFURAN
1 ,1-DIMETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
DIMETHYL HEPTENE
ETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
ETHYLENIMINE
* 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE
- HEPTANE
1-HEPTANOL
1 -HEPTENE
HEXANE
1-HEXENE
ISOCYANOMETHANE
KETONE
3-METHYLENE-PENTANE
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHYL-1 -PROPENE
NAPHTHALENE
* OXYBISMEHANE
2-PENTENE
1-PHENYLETHANONE
2-PROPENENITRIL
2-PROPYL-1 -HEPTANOL
TETRAHYDROFURAN
TRIDECANE
2,3,4-TRIMETHYLHEXANE
* 1,3.6-TRIOXOCANE
4-UNDECENE
XYLENE
O-XYLENE
PAIR #1
T T/C
3050 3051
32
63
50
24
PAIR #3
T T/C
3054 3055
18
71 100
38
610
140
11
FldBlk
T T/C
3056 3057
45
16
18 33
48
TrpBlk
T T/C
3058 3059
42
13
12
TOTAL
(ng)
50.00
171.00
38.00
610.00
63.00
140.00
50.00
35.00
AVE.
CONC.
(ng/L)
1.22
4.16
0.92
14.84
1.53
3.41
1.22
0.85
EMISS.
RATE
(mg/min)
0.84
?.89
0.64
10.30
1.06
2.36
0.84
0.59
* Detected only in blank traps
Shaded : data may be impacted by blank data values.
B-198
-------
NON-LISTED V-PICs
BYPASS DUCT RUN #4
Compound
- ACENAPHTHYLENE
ALKENE
ALKYLATED HYDROCARBON
BENZALDEHYDE
BENZONITRILE
• 2-BUTANONE
BUTENE/2-METHYL-1-PROPENE
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON DISULFIDE
DECANSE
* DIBENZOFURAN
1 ,1-DIMETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
DIMETHYL HEPTENE
ETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
ETHYLENIMINE
• 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE
- HEPTANE
1-HEPTANOL
1 -HEPTENE
HEXANE
1-HEXENE
ISOCYANOMETHANE
KETONE
3-METHYLENE-PENTANE
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-METHYL-1 -PROPENE
NAPHTHALENE
• OXYBISMEHANE
2-PENTENE
•I-PHENYLETHANONE
2-PROPENENITRIL
2-PROPYL-1 -HEPTANOL
TETRAHYDROFURAN
tplDECANE
2,3,4-TRIMETHYLHEXANE
*'l,3,6-TRIOXOCANE
4-UNDECENE
XYLENE
o-XYLENE
PAIR #1
T T/C
4050 4051
250 140
340 85
150
100 410
78
PAIR #3
T T/C
4054 4055
190 230
180 120
690
57 530
38
TrpBlk
T T/C
4058 4059
30
74
29
14 33
13
TOTAL
(ng)
810.00
725.00
840.00
1097.00
7B.QO
38.00
AVE.
CONC.
(ng/L)
20.40
18.26
21.16
27.63
1.96
0.96
EMISS.
RATE
mg/min)
14.02
12.55
14.54
18.98
1.35
0.66
* Detected only in blank traps
Shaded : data may be impacted by blank data values.
B-199
-------
NON-LISTED V-PICs
BYPASS DUCT RUN #5
Compound
* ACENAPHTHYLENE
ALKENE
ALKYLATED HYDROCARBON
BENZV.DEHYDE
BENZCNITRILE
* 2-BUTANONE
BUTENE/2-METHYL-1 -PROPENE
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON DISULFIDE
DECANSE
* DIBENZOFURAN
1 ,1-DIMETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
DIMETHYL HEPTENE
ETHYLCYCLOPROPANE
ETHYLENIMINE
' 2-FURANCARBOXALDEHYDE
* HEPTANE
1-HEPTANOL
1 -HEPTENE
HEXANE
1-HEXENE
ISOCYANOMETHANE
KETONE
3-METHYLENE-PENTANE
3-METHYLHEXANE
2-M ETH YL-1 -PROPEN E
NAPHTHALENE
* OXYBISMEHANE
2-PENTENE
1-PHENYLETHANONE
2-PROPENENITRIL
2-PROPYL-1 -HEPTANOL
TETRAHYDROFURAN
TRIDECANE
2,3,4-TRIMETHYLHEXANE
* 1,3,6-TRIOXOCANE
4-UNDECENE
XYLENE
o-XYLENE
PAIR #1
T T/C
5050 5051
430 15
1200
520
. 12
250
37
550
PAIR #3
T T/C
5054 5055
350
990
410
530
190
22
TrpBlk
T T/C
5058 5059
10
31 58
10
TOTAL
(ng)
795.00
2190.00
930.00
12.00
530.00
190.00
250.00
59.00
550.00
AVE.
CONC.
(ng/L)
20.03
55.16
23.43
0.30
13.35
4.79
6.30
1.49
13.85
EMISS.
RATE
mg/min)
13.76
37.90
16.09
0.21
9.17
3.29
4.33
1.02
9.52
* Detected only in blank traps
Shaded : data may be impacted by blank data values.
B-200
-------
Appendix B-9
Volatile Organlcs Analysis
Data Summary
APPENDIX B-10
SEMIVOLATILE ORGANICS DATA
B-201
-------
Appendix B-9
Volatile Organlcs Analysis
Data Summary
MOTE: No significant problems were encountered with the Method 0010 trains.
All test runs at each duct fell within the acceptable range for 1sok1net1c
performance, and all leak checks were passed.
B-203
-------
FILE NOME - R1MSV
RUM tt - RUN 13V -ASH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - MftIN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/2S/S9
PROJECT # - 9999
1 i-i 1 1 i a 1 Met er Vo 1 urne < Cu b i c Feet > =
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet ) =
Meter- Factor=
i»ti-iltiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet ) =
GAS, Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet) =
-Barometric Pressure (in Hg) =
Static Pressure < Inches H£O)=
percent Oxygen=
percent Carbon Dioxide=
[to i st ure Co 1 1 ect ed ( rn 1 > =
percent Water=
leverage Meter Temperature (F) =
Average Delta H (in H£O)=
Overage Delta P (in H£O)=
pverage Stack Temperature -
particulate Loading, Actual =
NC. Back Half Analysis
13. 499
21.S26
1 . COO
3. 1£Q
&. 950
739
5.3
£6.3
5A8. O
32
81.3
14.2
153
32.44
£9. 58
3. 7589
1O9. 8
0.83
12O. 0
7.62
1.219
2.438
2.973
915
2,724
1,822
1,460
0.OOOO
O.O
0.0
O.OO
Leak Correction= O.OOOO
Corr. to 7* O£ * 1£*; CO£
O.O O.O
B-205
-------
FILE N«ME - R1MSV
RUN # - RUN 1SV -ASH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - MflIN EBP OUTLET DUCT
DOTE - 1O/2S/89
PROJECT # - 9999
Po i nt
PROG.=VER 06/£7/S9
O1-1S-19SO 1O:£6:OA
•4
5
6
7
S
9
1C
li
12
13
14
15
16
17
IS
19
£O
Delta P
ivi
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
o.
i. H£0)
6OO
57O
5SO
550
AAO
soo
57O
570
610
5OO
68O
650
61O
6OO
560
43O
5£0
51 0
.SCO
A5O
Delta H
< in.
3.
3.
3.
3.
o
3.
3.
3.
3.
£.
3.
3.
3.
3.
3.
£.
3.
3.
£.
£.
H£0)
30
£0
30
15
55
35
£0
£5
50
9O
30
7O
50
50
50
SO
OO
OO
89
6O
Stack
>:F;
• 3O7
3O7
3O7
306
3OO
3O7
3O9
309
309
SOS
308
308
308
308
303
305
3O7
307
307
307
T Met er T
I n >: F )
71
Si
39
94 '
98
77
86
95
1OO
1O3
85
9£
97
1 0 1
103
68
97
10£
103
1O5
Out
-------
NAME - R1BSV
# - R1BSV
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP OUTLET DUCT
'- "•'":! - 10/23/89
'"R'-JJECT # ~ 9102
initial Meter -/'oiame (Cubic Feet ) =
rirai Meter Volu^s (CuDic Feet)-
'""'eter Fact or =
rinal Leak Rate (cu ft/min;=
Meter Volume- (Cubic Feet)*
Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)*
PROG. = VER 06 / 03/39
06-29-1990 06:12:04
Barometric Pressure (in Hg) =
ic Pressure (Inches H2G) =
percent Oxygen=
p'sr ,; en t Car b on Dioxide*
^'~<
Isokinetic =
Coefficients
Sampling Time (Minutes>=
^022 le Diameter dnches)=
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)*
Stack Axis tt2 (Inches)*
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)*
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)=
^low Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
plow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min) =
p'^rt iculate Loading - Front Half
^articulate Weight (g)=
^articulate Loadinq, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Articulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)*
Mission Rate (lb/hr)*
^o Back Half Analysis
964.679
.1061.885
1. 027
0. 004
93.831
94.736
29. 11
-2. 89
17.3
2.6
166. 5
7. 5
84
2.33
0.508
563
29. 13
28.28
0.7095
102. 4
0. B4
120.0
0. 300
24.0
96.0
16. 00
3,423
54,850
27,210
25,130
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.00
Corr. to 77. 02 & 127. C02
0.0000 0.0000
B-207
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - R1BSV
:N # - RlBSV
•..COAT I ON - BYPASS ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/28/33
"'POJECT tt - 3102
PROG.=VER 06/09/89
06-29-1990 06:12:OG
Initial fit tar Volume (Cubic heters)= 27,315
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters.)- 30.063
Meter Factor= 1.027
Final Leak Rate Ccu m/minJ= O.0001
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters>= 2.827
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)= 2.633
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)= 739
Static Pressure (.run H20>= -73
Percent Qxygen= 17.8
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 2.6
Moisture Collected (mi:>= 166.5
P2rcent Water- 7.6
Average Meter Temperature (C!>= 29
Average Delta H (mm H20!>= 59.2
Average Delta P (mm H20>= 12.9
Average Stack Temperature (C) = 298
Dry Molecular Weight= 29.13
Wet Molecular Weight= 23.28
Average Square Root of Delta P (mm H20) = 3.5755
7. Isokinetic= 102.4
Pit ot Coe f f i c i en t = 0. 84
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 120.0
Nozzle Diameter (mm>= 7.62
Stack Axis #1 CMeters:>= 0.610
Stack Axis #2 (Meters)= 2.433
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Meters:>= 1.486
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/min)= 1,045
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)= 1,553
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min>= 771
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/min!)= 712
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight Cg)= 0.0000
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (mg/cu m:>= 0.0
Particulate Loading, Actual Cmg/cu m:>= 0.0
Emission Rate (kg/hr)= 0.00
No Back Half Analysis
Corr. to 77. 02 8< 12'/. CO-
0.0 0.0
B-208
-------
>rlLE NAME - RiBSV
RUN # - RIBSV
i-OCATION - BYPASS
DATE - 10/28/39
PROJECT # - 9102
Point #
ESP OUTLET DUCT
PROQ.=VER 06/09/89
06-29-1990 06:12:30
4
&
£
a
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
13
19
20
Delta P
(in. H20 )
0.290
0 . 520
0.520
0.610
0.550
0 . 360
0.510
0 . 550
0 .550
0 . 540
0.330
0.470
0.500
0.510
0.540
0.410
0.500
0.620
0.600
0.580
Delta H
(in. H20)
1.20
2.00
2.30
2.80
2.60
1 . 40
2.30
2.60
2 . 60
2.60
1 . 50
2.00
2.20
2 . 50
2.70
2 . 00
2.40
2 . 90
2.90
2.60
Stack
<-g:)
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Final Wt. Tare Wt
P'RQBE RINSE 0.0000 0.0000
IMPINQERS 0•0000 0.0000
probe Rinse Blank = 0.0000
Impinger Blank (mg/mi:>= 0.0000
Vol
Cmi:>
0.0
o.o
Net Wt
0.0000
0.0000
B-209
-------
FILE NOME - R2MSV
RUN # - RUN 2SV - OSH SROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - MO IN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DOTE - 10/29/89
PROJECT # - 91O2-64-13
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet) = 755.100
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 863.35O
Meter Factor= / 1. OOO
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 98.£5O
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet)= 94.971
Barometric Pressure (in Hg)= L3.ll
Static Pressure (Inches H£O) = -O.41
PROG.=VER 06/27/89
O1-15-198O 11:31:41
Leak Correction= O.OOOO
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Mo i st ure Co 11 ect ed (rn 1)
Percent Water=
4.4
£3.5
5O6. 7
£O. 1
Overage Meter Temperature (F)=
Overage Delta H (in H£O)=
Overage Delta P (in H2O)=
Overage Stack Temperature (F) =
Dry Molecular Weight58
Wet Molecular Weight=
Overage Square Root of Delta P
% Isokinetics
(in H2O) =
73
£. S£
O. 577
321
32.74
29.78
O.7585
99.9
Pitot Coefficient88 O. 83
Sampling Time (Minutes)= 120.O
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)= O. 30O
Stack Ox is #1 (Inches)= 48.O
Stack Ox is #2 (I riches ) = 96. O
Rectangular Stack
Stack Orea (Square Feet)= 32. OO
Stack Velocity (Octual, Feet/min)= 3,074
Flow Rate (Octual, Cubic ft/min)= 98,369
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/rnin)= 64,636
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/rnin)= 51,655
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= O.OOOO
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= O.OOOO
Particulate Loading, flctual (gr/cu ft)= O.OOOO
Emission Rate
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
plLE NAME - R2MSV
RUN # - RUN 2SV - flSH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - MfilN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DflTE - 1O/29/89
PROJECT » - si02-54-13
PROG.*VER 06/S7/89
01-15-1980 11:3£:08
al Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)*
pinal Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)*
Meter Factor*
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)*
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)*
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)=
Static Pressure (mm H20)=
Percent Oxygen*
Percent Carbon Dioxide*
Moisture Collected (rnl) =
Percent Water*
Average Meter Temperature (C) =
Average Delta H (mm H2O)=
Average Delta P (mm H2O)=
Average Stack Temperature
-------
FILE NflME - R£MSV
RUN * - RUN £SV - flSH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - MfilN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DflTE - 10/23/89
PROJECT # - 91O£-64-13
PROS.=VER O&/27/89
O1-1S-198O 11:32:36
Point
1
3
4
5
&
3
10
1 1
1£
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
£0
Delta P Delta H
in. H£O> ;F)
59
61
63
65
63
67
69
70
72
74
68
73
74
75
76
71
74
74
75
76
Fract ion
DRY CflTCH
FILTER
Fract ion
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt.
O.O13O 3O.OOOO
O.O1OO 3O. OOOO
O.O15O 3O.OOOO
O.O1OO 3O.OOOO
B-212
-------
FILE NAME - R2BSV
RUN # - RUN 2SV - ASH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - BYPASS 'ESP OUTLET DUCT
DOTE - 10/29/83
PROJECT # - 9102-64-13
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Pinal Meter Volume (Cubic Feet>=
Meter Factor=
Final Leak Rate (cu ft/rnin) =
Net Meter Volume
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NOME - R£BSV
RUN # - RUN £SV - ASH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP OUTLET DUCT
DOTE - iO/£9/89
PROJECT » - 9102-64-13
PROG.=VER O6/1£7/89
O1-15-198O 11:27:22
Initial Meter Volume =
Static Pressure (mm H£O> =
1. 794
4. £88
1. O£7
O.OO01
£.561
2. 449
739
-73
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (ml) =
Percent Water=
17.4
£.9
17£. 4
8. 6
Overage Meter Temperature = £7
Overage Delta H Unm H£O)= SO. O
Overage Delta P
-------
FILE NOME - R2BSV
RUN * - RUN 2SV - «SH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - BYPflSS ESP OUTLET DUCT
D«TE - 10/29/89
PROJECT *» - 9102-64-13
PROG.=VER O6/27/89
01-15-198O 11:27:49
Point *»
1
2
3
4
5
6
1*
a
3
1C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
20
Delta P
70
73
ao
84
86
74
SO
85
87
9O
36
36
38
88
89
78
82
37
38
S3
Meter T
Out '!F)
69
69
7O
73
74
73
74
75
76
78
79
80
SO
80
81
76
73
73
79
80
Fract ion
DRY CftTCH
FILTER
Fract ion
PROBE RINSE
IMPINGERS
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt,
O. OOOO
O.OOOO
O. OOOO
O.OOOO
Final Wt. Tare Wt.
O.OOOO
O.OOOO
Probe Rinse Blank
-------
FILE NAME - R3MSV
RUN # - RUN 3SV - ASH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - MAIN ESP OUTLET
FILE NOME - R3MSV
RUN # - RUN 3SV - ASH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - MflIN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 1O/30/S9
PROJECT # - 9102-64-13
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet > = 665. 1 GO
Final Meter Volume < Cubic Feet ) = 957. 59O
Meter Factor* i.OOO
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 9£. 49O
Gas Volume {Dry Standard Cubic Feet>= 94.436
Barometric Pressure =
Average Delta H (in H2O) =
Average Delta P (in H£O>»
Average Stack Temperature « 32. OO
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/min)« 2, 9£2
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=» 93, SOS
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/rnin>= 63,747
Flow .Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/tnin)« 52,737
Part icu late Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= O. OOOO
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf>» O. OOOO
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu f t ) - O. OOOO
Emission Rate (lb/hr)= O-OO
No Back Half Analysis
Corr. to 7* O2 & 12% CO£
O.OOOO O.OOOO
B-216
-------
* * METRIC UNITS *
FILE NOME - R3MSV
RUN * - RUN 3SV - flSH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - MO IN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DOTE - 1O/3O/S9
PROJECT # - 91O2-64-13
Initial Meter Volume >;Cubic Meters)=
Final Meter Volume =
Meter Factor=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume =
Overage Stack Temperature -
Ernission Rate
-------
FILE NOME - R3MSV
RUN # - RUN 3SV - flSH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - MfilN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DflTE - 1O/3O/S9
# - 910£-64-13
Po i nt
PROG.=VER 06/£7/39
O1-16-13SO 10:£O:O3
4
5
6
7
&
9
1C
11
1£
13
14
15
16
17
IS
19
£0
Delta P
(in. H£O)
0. 63O
0. 6OO
0. 590
0 . 6OO
0. 45O
O. 46O
O. 54 O
0. 54O
O. 6OO
0. 540
0.610
0.6£O
0. 590
O. 5SO
O. 54O
O. 5OO
0. 5£O
0. 5£0
O. 5OO
O. 4 SO
Delta H
3O7
3OS
3O7
3O7
£99
3O9
3O8
3O3
306
304
3O7
3O5
305
3O3
30 £
3O1
3O£
304
304
3O£
T Meter- T
I n < F )
43
43
55
53
61
49
56
54
69
71
51
57
5O
61
6£
50
57
6£
66
67
Out (F)
43
49
44
45
47
43
49
51
53
54
51
5£
51
51
51
43
51
51
53
54
Fr-act iori
DRY COTCH
FILTER
Fi~act ion
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt.
O. OOOO
O.OOOO
O.OOOO
0.OOOO
Final Wt. Tare Wt,
PROBE RINSE O. OOOO O.OOOO
IMPINGERS O.OOOO O.OOOO
Probe Rinse Blank (rng/ml)= O. OOOO
Irnpinger Blank
O.OOOO
O.OOOO
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate Time
-------
FILE NONE - R3BSV
RUN # - RUN 3SV - ASH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP OUTLET DUCT
DfiTE - 10/3O/S9
PROJECT # - 9102-54-13
PROG.=VER O6/£7/83
01-16-1380 10:1O-O6
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)=
Final Meter Volume '(Cubic Feet ) =
Meter Factor=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Met Meter Volume (Cubic Feet ) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet ) =
Barometric P'ressure (in Hg) =
Static P'ressure (Inches H£O) =
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected =
Dry Molecular Weight=
Wet Molecular Weight=
Overage Square Root of Delta P (in H£O)=
'A Isokinetic=
P'itot Coefficients
Sampling Time (Minutes) =
Nozzle Diameter (I nches )=
Stack Axis #1 (I nches )=
Stack Axis #£ ( Inches) =
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet ) =
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/rnin)=
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft /ruin) =
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/rnin)=
Part icu late Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)=
Partieulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft>=
Emission Rate (lb/hr)=
No Back Half Analysis
4£. Q77
1.O27
3O. 3£6
S3. 71£
£3. SS
— £. 3O
16.3
4.7
153.1
7.7
53
1.97
O. 478
555
£9. 4O
£8.53
0.6384
33.5
0.34
ISO. O
0. 3OO
£4. O
36. O
16. OO
3,£5O
5£, OO4
£6, 53O
£4,437
O. OOOO
O. OOOO
O. OOOO
O. OO
Leak Correction=
O.OOOO
Corr. to 754 OS & 1£# C0£
O.OOOO O.OOOO
B-219
-------
* * METRIC UNITS-
FILE NAME - R3BSV
RUN # - RUN 3SV - ftSH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - 10/30/89
PROJECT tt - 91O2-S4-13
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Met er Fact or=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)=
Barometric Pressure (rnrn Hg) =
Static Pressure (rnrn H£O) =
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected (rnl) =
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature =
F i. na I Met er Vo 1 urne < C u b i c Feet) =
"'1 e * e r Fact o r=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Met Meter Volume :ide=
Moisture Collected = 317
Dry Molecular Weight= 3£. O9
Wet Molecular Weight* £9.35
Average Square Root of Delta P iis =ȣ < Inches) = 35. O
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area
-------
* * METRIC UNITS
r-ZLE NfiME - R4MSV
RUN # - RUN 4SV - flSH GROVE CEMENT KILN-
LOCATION - MflIN ESP OUTLET DUCT
BflTE - 1O/ 31/39
PROJECT # - 31O5-64-13
I n i t i a 1 Met er Vo 1 urne >: Cu b i c Met er s ) =
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters) =
Meter Factor=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume (Cubic Meters) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters) =
Bar ornet r i c Pressure < rnrn Hg ) =
Static Pressure (rnrn H£0) =
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Moisture Collected =
Flow rate (fictual, Cubic rn/rnin> =
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/min)-
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/rnin> =
Part icu late Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight -
Ernission Rate (kg/hr) =
PROG. =VER OS,-'OS/89
li-Oi-13S3 09:35:05
57. 969
3O. S76
1 . OOO
£. 907
£. 857
750
-10
5. a
£4. 1
51£. 4
£6
7£. 7
14. 9
158
3£. 09
£9. 35
3. S54£
1O1. &
O. 83
1£O. O
7. 6£
l.£19
£. 438
£. 973
94£
£, 8O£
1,877
1,51£
0.OOOO
0.0
O. O
O. 00
Leak Correction^ O.OOOO
Corr. to 7'/i O£ 8, 1£'4 CO£
O. O O.O
No Back Half finalysis
B-223
-------
FILE NftME - R4MSV
RUN # - RUN 43V - ASH G'CVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - MftIN ESP OUTLET DUCT
DflTE - 1O/31/89
PROJECT # - 51O2-54-13
PROG.=VE R OS/09/39
1 1 ->:> 1-1589 O9 : 35 : 3O
:'oint #
1
£
3
4
5
S
-7
a
9
10
i i
12
13
14
15
16
17
ia
19
2O
De
•: i',-
O.
O.
O.
0.
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
O.
O.
O.
O.
O.
0.
0.
O.
O.
0.
0.
sit a P
•i. H2O)
530
59O
59O
5SO
44O
73O
690
62O
66O
530
65O
650
61O
630
530
5 1 0
53O
54O
54 O
49O
Delta H
>: in.
tai> .
tz, .
O
b_ .
L_ •
2^
3.
3.
3.
3.
2.
3.
3.
3.
3.
2.
c*
2.
fZr
2.
2.
H20 )
OO
SO
SO
ao
15
45
35
OO
25
65
1O
1 0
05
10
50
5O
65
75
70
45
Stack
:F:I
t_4
65
66
68
7O
71
74
75
76
76
73
75
i 5
76
77
76
79
81
81
S3
Fr-act ion
DRY CATCH
FILTER
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt.
O.OOOO
O.OOOO
O.OOOO
O.OOOO
Fraction Final Wt. Tare Wt.
< g > < g)
PROBE RINSE O.OOOO O.OOOO
IMPINGERS O.OOOO 0.OOOO
Probe Rinse Blank Time
-------
:-"ILE NAME - R4BSV
'-UN # - RUN 4SV - ASH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP OUTLET DUCT
DflTE - 10/3 I/ 33
PROJECT # - 9i02-54-l.i
I r, i t i a 1 Met er- Vo 1 urne < Cub i c Feet ) =
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet ) =
Meter Factor*
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume < Cubic Feet ) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet ) =
Barometric Pressure (in Hg) =
St at i c Pressure ( I nches H20 > -
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Mo i st ure Co 1 1 ect ed < m 1 > =
Percent Water=
Average Meter Temperature =
fiverage Square Root of Delta P
% Isokinetic=
Pitot Coefficient=
Sampling Time (Minutes) ~
Nozzle Diameter < Inches) =
Stack fix is #1 a nches ) =
Stack fix is #2 =
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)=
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)=
Emission Rate (lb/hr)=
No Back Half flnalysis
244.957
1. O27
39.739
QS.3O6
29. 53
-2. 90
16. 9
3. 7
149. 8
7. 4
72
1.95
O. 459
543
29.27
2S. 43
O.6754
98. &
O. 84
12O. O
O. 3OO
24. 0
96. O
15. OO
3, 177
5O,S31
26,211
24,272
O.OOOO
O.OOOO
O.OOOO
O. OO
Leak Correction= 0.OOOO
Corr. to 7% O2 & 1254 COS
O.OOOO O.OOOO
B-225
-------
*• * METRIC UNITS
FILE NAME - R4ESV
RUM =» - RUN 4SV - ASH GROVE CEMENT KILN
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP CUTLET DUCT
DATE - 1O/31/33
PROJECT •» - 3iO£-54-13
PRGG.=VER O6/O3/S3
ll-Oi-1333 OS:33:;
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= £.336
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)33 9.412
Meter Factor= 1.027
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Wet Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)= £.542
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Meters)= £. 5OO
Barometric Pressure (mm Hg)= 75O
Static Pressure (mm H£O)= -74
Leak Correction= O. OOOO
Percent Q:nygen=
Pev-cent Carbon Dioxide=
Mo i st ure Co 11 ect ed (rn 1) =
Percent Water=
IB. 3
2. 7
143. S
7. 4
fiver-age Meter Temperature (C)= £2
Overage Delta H (rnrn H£O) = 43.5
Average Delta P (mm H£O) = 11.7
Average Stack Temperature (C)= 234
Dry Molecular Weight= £3.27
Wet Molecular Weight= £3.43
Average Square Root of Delta P (rnrn H£0)= 3.4033
% I sok i net i c= 38.8
Pitot Coefficient=
Samp1i ng T i me (Mi nut es) =
r>Jo2 2 1 e D i arnet er (rnrn) =
Stack flxis #1 (Meters)=
Stack ftxis *£ (Meters)=
Rectangular Stack
Stack flrea (Square Meters)=
Stack Velocity (Actual, m/rnin) =
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic m/min)=
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/rnin) =
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic m/tniiri) =
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)=
Particulate Loading, Dry Std.
-------
FILE N«ME - R4B5V
»L'N # - RUN 4SV - >3SH I-=:OVE CEMENT
LOCATION - BYPflSS ESP CUTLET DUCT
DflTE - 1O/31/39
PROJECT # - 91O2-54-13
Point
PRCG.=VER 06/O9/83
ll-Oi-1939 O9j4O:OC
7
a
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
IS
17
IS
19
£O
Delta P
in. H2O)
O. 31 0
O. 44O
0. 530
O. 50O
0. 510
0. 37O
O. 430
O. 47O
0. 50O
0. 5OO
O. 31 0
0. 460
0. 50O
O. 490
0. 490
O. 350
0. 460
0. 550
0. 530
O. 430
Delta H
•;in. H20)
'.. 3O
1 . SO
2. 10
2. 1O
2. 10
2. 1O
i . 90
2. 10
2. 1O
2. 1O
1. 50
2. 00
2. 10
2. 00
2. 00
1. 5O
1.90
2. 10
2. 10
2. 10
Stack
= O.OOOO
O.OOOO
O.OOOO
Vol.
O. O
O. O
O.OOOO
O.OOOO
Net Wt.
O.OOOO
O.OOOO
Multiple leak checks used. Final readings for each segment are listed below
Lk Rate
O.015O 3O.OOOO
O.0040 30.OOOO
O.010O 3O.OOOO
O.O1OO 3O. OOOO
B-227
-------
FILE NAME - R5MSV
RUN '» - R5MSV
LC-CATIDN - MAIM ESP OUTLET DUCT
DATE - li-2-89
PROJECT # - 9iO£-64-13
I n i t i a 1 Met er Vo 1 urne < C u b i c Feet) = 91. 5OO
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Feet)= 185.51C
Meter Factor= 1.OOO
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Me t Met er Vo 1 urne (C u b i c Feet) = 94. 010
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet>= 95.592
«
£:ygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Mo i st ure Co11ect ed (m1) =
Percent Water=
D. ii
£7. 4
479. 9
19. 1
Average Meter Temperature =
59
£. 46
O. 551
3£O
3£. 59
£9. SO
O.7413
100.5
Pi tot Coeffieient= O. S3
Sampling Time (Minutes)— 1£O.O
Nozzle Diameter (Inches)= O.3OO
Stack Axis #1 (Inches)= 48. O
Stack Axis #£ (Inches)= 96. O
Rectangular Stack
Stack Area (Square Feet)= 3£. GO
Stack Velocity (Actual, Feet/rnin>= £,971
Flow Rate (Actual, Cubic ft/wiin)= 95,065
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic ft/r*iin)= 63, 8£O
Flow Rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic ft/min)= 51,615
tf
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight (g)= O.OOOO
Particulate Loading, Dry Std. (gr/scf)= O.OOOO
Particulate Loading, Actual (gr/cu ft)= O.OOOO
Emission Rate
-------
* * METRIC UNITS * *
FILE NAME - R5MSV
PUN # - R5MSV
LGCflTION - MAIN ESP OUTLEi DUCT
DATE - 11-2-39
PROJECT # - 9102-64-1.J
Initial Meter Volume -Cable Meters)=
Final Meter Volume (Cubic Meters)=
Meter Factor=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter Volume =
Percent Water=
Overage Meter Temperature (C> =
Average Delta H =
"/. Isokinetic=
Pi tot Coefficient3
Sampling Time (Minutes)=
Nozzle Di arnet er < rnrn) =
Stack fix is #1 (Metera)=
Stack fix is #£ CMeters) =
Rectangular Stack
Stack firea (Square Meters)=
Stack Velocity (Actual, rn/rnin) =
Flow rate (Actual, Cubic rn/rnin) =
Flow rate (Standard, Wet, Cubic m/rniir.) =
Flow rate (Standard, Dry, Cubic rn/rnin) =
Particulate Loading - Front Half
Particulate Weight
-------
FILE NOME - R5MSV
RUN # - R5MSV
LOCATION•- MR IN ESP
DflTE - 11-2-89
PROJECT # - 91O2-64-1Z
OUTLET DUC'i
r. =VER O6/O9/39
'2-:S'8'3 17:05:05
Po i nt
£
/
a
9
1C
11
12
1 3
14
15
IS
17
IS
19
2O
Delta P
in. H2O3
O. SOO
O. 580
0. 540
O. 550
O. 470
O. S4O
O. 500
O. 59O
0. 590
O. 530
0. 640
0. 620
O. 6OO
0. 550
O. 49O
O. 4SO
O. 490
O. SOO
O. 51 0
O. 45O
Delta H
< i n .
.-' ,
£.
£.
s.
wl. .
2.
£.
'^L m
uZ *
IZ. «
£.'•
w •
d •
c! »
3.
£.
£.
^ •
c. •
2.
H2O)
53
44
3O
40
15
77
72
66
7O
45
85
32
75
48
22
15
18
27
31
O4
St a
3 2O
32O
32 O
321
318
322
322
322
322
321
32 O
321
321
321
322
318
318
32O
32O
32O
I n •: F }
43
52
6O
63
64
52
61
£9
73
75
56
62
69
7O
72
59
64
7O
71
72
Met er T
Out -IF)
42
44
45
48
50
49
52
54
56
53
54
55
57
57
53
56
53
58
59
6O
Fr-act ion
DRY CflTCH
FILTER
Fract ion
Final Wt. Tare Wt. Blank Wt. Net Wt.
ij. uOOO
O.OOOO
0.OOOO
O. OC»OO
o.oooo
O.OOOO
o.oooo
Final Wt. Tare Wt,
•I g ) < g)
PROBE RINSE O. OOOO O.OOOO
IMPINGERS O. OOOO O. OOOO
Probe Rinse Blank
-------
~ I L. E N fi M E - R 5 E- S V
RUN
- R5BSV
PRCG. =VER 06/O?/S'5
li--:.£-19fi9 17:OO;1
LGCfiTION - BYPflSS ESP OUTLET DUCT
DPTE - il/£/S9
PROJECT tt - 9102-64-13
I n i t i a i Met er Vo 1 urns < Cu b i c Feet ) =
'~ i na 1 Met er Vo 1 unie ( Cub i c Feet ) =
Meter Factor=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Net Meter- Volume (Cubic Feet ) =
Gas Volume (Dry Standard Cubic Feet ) =
Barometric Pressure (in Hg>=
Static Pressure < Inches H£G> =
Percent Oxygen=
Percent Carbon Dioxide=
Mo i st ur e Collected < rn 1 ) =
Percent Water=
flverage Meter Temperature
-------
* * METRIC UNITS-
FILE NAME - R5ESV
RUN # - R5BSV
LOCATION - BYPASS ESP CUTLET DUCT
DATE - 11/2/83
PROJECT 8 - 9.102-54-13
P R 0 G. = V E R O 6 / O 3 / 3 ?
11-02-1383 17:CO:4
Initial Meter Volume (Cubic Metf?rs) =
F i n a 1 Met ev- Vo 1 urne ( C a D i c Met er = ) =
Met er Fact or=
Multiple leak checks, see end of printout
Met Meter- Volume '(Cubic Meters>=
Gas Volume '(Dry Standard Cubic Meters) =
Barometric Pressure (Kirn Hg ) =
Static Pressure (mm H£O) =
3.457
11.917
1 . 0£7
2.527
2. 491
755
-74
Lea k Correct i on= 0.OOOO
Oxygevi= 16. S
Percent Carbon Dioxide= 3. S
Mo i st ure Co 1 1 ect ed < rn 1 ) = 153.1
P'ercent Water= 7, 5
flverage Meter Temperature = 45.5
Average Delta P (rnrn H£O)= 10.9
Average Stack Temperature '. M i nut es ) = 1 20. O
Nozzle Diameter = 7. 6£
Stack flxiE #1 (Meters)= O. 61O
Stack flxis #£
-------
FILE NOME - R5BSV
RUN « - R5BSV
LOCATION - BYPfiSS ESP
DflTE - 11/2/39
PROJECT # - 91O2-S4-1;
Point
i
PROG.= VER 06/03/39
11-02-1389 17:O1:;
CUTLET DUCT
to
i
a
3
1C
1 1
i '""'
13
14
15
IS
17
ia
19
20
Delta P
in. H£O)
O. 3OO
O. 44O
O. 5OO
O. 490
o. 4ao
O. 330
O. 46O
O. 4 SO
O. 43O
O. 470
O. £9O
0.41O
0. 43O
O. 45O
0. 45O
0. 32O
O. 41O
0. 430
O. 47O
O. 46O
Delta H
(in. H£0)
1. 1O
1 . 7O
£ . OO
2. 00
2. OO
i . 40
1.90
2. OO
2. 00
1.90
1. 10
1. SO
1.7O
i.ao
i.ao
1.40
i.ao
2. 1O
2. 3O
2. 30
Stack
O.OOOO O.OOOO O.OOOO O.OOOO
O.OOOO O.OOOO O. OOOO O.OOOO
Final Wt. Tare Wt.
PROBE RINSE O. OOOO O.OOOO
IMPINGERS O.OOOO O.OOOO
Probe Rinse Blank
O. O
O. O
Net Wt.
-------
Appendix B-9
Volatile Organlcs Analysis
Data Summary
METHODS
The MM5 samples for semivolatiles, PCDD/PCDFs, and gravimetric analyses
were extracted according to EPA SW-846 methods with some modifications. The
five components of the MM5 sampling train (front-half rinse, filter, back-half
rinse, XAD, and condensate) were each extracted separately. All samples were
treated similarly. The surrogates for the PCDD/PCDFs and semivolatiles were
added alternating between the five components. The surrogates employed for
this study were Di^-2-chlorophenol and D10-pyrene to monitor accuracy for the
semlvolatlle organic screen and the ^C-labeled PCDD/PCDFs specified 1n SW-846
Method 8290 to monitor accuracy for PCDD/PCDF analysis.
Prior to extracting the filter, the front-half rinse was filtered to
remove any partlculates. This filter and solids catch were added to the
Soxhlet setup used to extract the MM5 filter. The filter and XAD samples were
extracted Initially with methylene chloride for 16 to 22 h. The solvent was
removed, and toluene was added to the apparatus for a second extraction. A
third solvent, methyl-t-butyl ether, was added to the components and extracted
for 16 to 22 h. All three solvent extractions were combined and saved to be
combined with the aqueous extracts. These samples were extracted using a
Soxhlet extraction device according to SW-846 Method 3540.
The three solvent extraction scheme was also used for front-half, back-
half, and condensate components of the MM5 train. The pH of the fractions was
initially adjusted to neutral, pH 7-8, using 1 M NaOH or 1:1 H2SOU:H20.
Methylene chloride was the first solvent, and each sample was extracted three
times 1n a separatory funnel. The pH was adjusted to 11 using 1 N NaOH and
the sample extracted three more times with methylene chloride. The pH of the
fraction was adjusted back to neutral for extraction with toluene and methyl-
t-butyl ether, respectively. All the solvent extracts were combined and saved
to be concentrated with the filter and XAD fractions. SW-846 Method 3510 was
used for these extractions.
The five component extracts from each train were combined and
concentrated by rotoevaporatlon to approximately 5 ml. The samples were then
transferred to a vial calibrated to a volume of 10 mL together with several
rinses. The combined extracts were concentrated to 10 ml using a nitrogen
evaporator and split as follows: 2.5 ml for PCDD/PCDF analysis, 2.5 ml for
semlvolatHe organic screen, and 5 ml for gravimetric analysis. The semi-
volatile portion was nitrogen-evaporated to 1 ml and held for analysis. The
PCDD/PCDF portion was cleaned up according to SW-846 Method 8280. The
cleaned-up extracts were concentrated to a final volume of 25 yL.
The sample aliquots designated for the semlvolatHe organic screens were
spiked with 100 ug of 2,2'-d1fluorob1phenyl and analyzed according to EPA
Method 1625. This analytical method 1s roughly equivalent to SW-846 Method
8270 1n terms of chromatographlc conditions and analytical parameters. The
target compound 11st from Method 1625 (Table B-10-1) was used to create a
target compound library. In addition, the five most abundant nontarget
compounds were identified for each sample. With the exception of the
surrogates, relative response factors equal to 1 were used to calculate target
B-235
-------
Appendix B-9
Volatile Organlcs Analysis
Data Summary
and nontarget compound concentrations. All sample concentration calculations
accounted for the splits described above.
The cleaned-up sample aliquots designated for PCDD/PCOF analysis were
spiked with the Method 8290-requ1red internal standards (98 pg of ^K-l,2,3,4-
TCDD and 196 pg of i3C-l,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD). They were analyzed by SW-846
Method 8290. All sample concentration calculations accounted for the splits
described above.
Several quality control samples were prepared to monitor the quality
(precision and accuracy) of the analytical results. These samples were a
filter blank, blank filter matrix spike, blank filter matrix spike duplicate,
XAD blank, blank XAD matrix spike, blank XAD matrix spike duplicate, water
blank, blank water matrix spike, and blank water matrix spike duplicate.
These nine samples were prepared and analyzed as described above for
PCDD/PCDF. The blanks were also analyzed for semlvolatiles.
RESULTS
Table B-10-2 summarizes the analytical results for PCDOs and PCDFs in the
Ash Grove samples. Positive identification of the 2,3,7,8-substituted con-
geners was based on retention time and theoretical ratios of areas measured
for each of the two ions monitored (±30%). All calibration criteria specified
on SW-846 Method 8290 for the initial and continuing calibration checks of
PCDDs and PCDFs were met during the analysis of these samples.
Surrogate recoveries for PCDDs and PCDFs are summarized 1n Table B-10-3.
Only two of the 63 surrogate recovery determinations did not meet the accuracy
quality control limit (QCL) of 40% to 120%. Precision QCLs (35% RSD) were met
for the combined total of surrogate recoveries and also for the surrogates
spiked Into the XAD-2 resin component of the MM5 sampling trains. One of nine
surrogate determinations spiked Into the filter component of the sampling
trains did not meet precision QCLs.
Tables B-10-4 and B-10-6 present the recoveries of PCDD/PCDFs spiked into
XAD, filter, and water blanks, respectively. For the XAD spiked blanks
(Table B-4), only three out of 34 recovery determinations did not meet the
accuracy QCLs. Both of the duplicate spiked blanks met the precision quality
control limits. The filter (Table B-10-5) and water (Table B-10-6) spikes met
accuracy QCLs for 32 out of 34 determinations, and the duplicate spiked blanks
met precision QCLs.
Tables B-10-7 to B-10-16 summarize the results of the semivolatHe
organic screen using GC/MS. For each table, the compounds specified in
Table B-10-1 that were found in these samples are reported together with
approximate concentrations for compounds found above or near the estimated
detection limit, also specified In the tables. In addition, for each sample,
the five most abundant nontarget compounds Identified are reported, with
approximated sample concentrations.
Table B-10-17 summarizes surrogate recoveries for samples screened for
semi volatile organic compounds by GC/MS. Only Dlo-pyrene recoveries are
8-236
-------
Appendix B-9
Volatile Organlcs Analysis
Data Summary
reported. Dii-2-Chlorophenol recoveries were not reported because this
compound eluted within the toluene solvent front. The use of toluene as an
extraction solvent was required for effective solvent extraction of PCDDs and
PCDFs. It was not foreseen that this compound would elute within the toluene
solvent front, and thus no corrective action could be taken to resolve this.
Out of 14 surrogate recovery determinations, 13 met accuracy quality control
limits. Precision QCLs for overall surrogate recoveries were met but were
slightly above the QCL of 35% for surrogates spiked Into the filter and XAD-2
components of the sampling trains.
Tables B-10-18 to B-10-20 present the results for the blanks (XAD,
filter, and water) corresponding to samples screened for semi volatile organic
compounds using GC/MS.
B-237
-------
TABLE B-10-1. COMPOUNDS MONITORED DURING GO/MS SCREEN
1. N-N i tro sod 1 methyl an nine 42.
2. a-P1co1ine 43.
3. Styrene 44.
4. B1s(2-ch1orophenol) ether 45.
5. Phenol 46.
6. 2-Chlorophenol 47.
7. n-Decane 48.
8. N-Nitroso-d1-n-propylanrine 49.
9. 1,3-Dichlorobenzene 50.
10. l,4-D1ch1orobenzene 51.
11. p-Cymene 52.
12. l,2-D1chlorobenzene 53.
13. B1s(2-chloro1sopropyl) ether 54.
14. Hexachloroethane 55.
15. Nitrobenzene " 56.
16. Isophrone 57.
17. 2-N1trophenol 58.
18. 2,4-Dimethyl phenol 59.
19. B1s(2-ch1oroethoxy)methane 60.
20. 2,4-Dichlorophenol 61.
21. 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 62.
22. Naphthalene 63.
23. a-Terp1neol 64.
24. n-Dodecane 65.
25. 1,2,3-Trlchlorobenzene 66.
26. Hexachloro-l,3-butad1ene 67.
27. 4-Chloro-3-methy1phenol 68.
28. Hexachlorocyclopentadlene 69.
29. 2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 70.
30. 2,4,5-Trlchlorophenol 71.
31. 2-Chloronaphthalene 72.
32. Dlphenyl 73.
33. Dlphenyl ether 74.
34. 2,6-D1n1trotoluene 75.
35. Dimethyl phthalate 76.
36. Acenaphthylene 77.
37. Acenaphthene 78.
38. 2,4-D1n1trophenol 79.
39. Dlbenzofuran 80.
40. 4-N1trophenol 81.
41. 2,4-D1n1trotoluene 82.
2-Naphthylam1ne
N-Hexadecane
Fluorene
4-Chlorophenyl-phenyl ether
01 ethyl phthalate
4,6-01n1tro-2-methylphenol
Diphenylamlne
l,2-D1phenylhydraz1ne
N-N1trosod1phenylam1ne
4-Bromophenyl-phenyl ether
Hexach1orobenzene
Dlbenzothiophene
Pentachlorophenol
Phenanthrene
Anthracene
Carbazole
D1-n-buty1 phthalate
n-Eicosane
Fluoranthene
Benzidlne
Pyrene
Benzyl butyl phthalate
Tetracosane
Chrysene
3,3'-D1chlorobenz1d1ne
Benzfajanthracene
B1s(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
D1-n-octyl phthalate
Benzo(b]f1uoranthene
BenzoIk]f1uoranthene
Benzojalpyrene
Triacontane
01 benz[a,h] anthracene
Benzo [g,h,ilperylene
Tetradecane
Octadecane
Docosane
Hexacosane
Octacosane
I ndeno [ 1,2,3-c,d ] pyrene
2,3,6-Trichlorophenol
B-238
-------
TABLE B-10-2. AMOUNT OF PCDD/PCDF FOUND (pg)
Analyte
2,3,7,8-TCDF
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
TCDF
TCDD
PeCDF
PeCDO
HxCDF
HxCDO
HpCDF
MpCDD
Run
1001-
1005
NO
ND
57.7
37.3
21.8
69.6
ND
36.3
NO
ND
ND
44.1
ND
ND
177
211
761
136
ND
240
21.8
97.8
122
ND
302
Run
1006-
1010
240
ND
ND
101
ND
126
61.5
80.8
ND
ND
• ND
37.3
ND
ND
122
312
468
1290
ND
552
44.5
413
118
110
219
Run
3001-
3005
59.6
ND
50.1
33
ND
96.8
36.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
31.4
157
ND
134
616
550
177
ND
225
ND
184
98.2
273
349
Run
3006-
3010
63.1
ND
ND
ND
ND
62.9
ND
25.9
ND
ND
ND
38.2
ND
55.2
119
405
629
108
ND
59.7
ND
116
108
101
193
Run
4001-
4005
700
ND
279
330
92
796
267
380
ND
141
140
212
1300
241
799
1210
1350
3220
463
3130
595
2540
1310
2020
1470
Run
4006-
4010
170
ND
128
ND
ND
147
40.8
33.1
34.1
ND
ND
39.3
ND
92
123
328
677
625
ND
259
ND
297
49.2
172
212
B-239
-------
TABLE B-10-3. PERCENT SURROGATE RECOVERIES (PCDD/PCDF)
DO
1
ro
*»
0
>3C-TCDF
13C-TCOD
>3C-PeCDF
i3C-PeCDD
»3C-HxCDF
i3C-HxCDD
»3C-HpCDF
>3C-HpCDD
•3C-OCDD
Average
Train
Recovery
% RSD
Spiked on
Run
1001-
1005
82.6
59.5
87.3
87.8
57.7
65.1
53.7
64.2
51.8
65.5
18
Filter
Run
1006-
1010
81.2
79.6
78.1
81.8
56.3
65.5
48.5
69.4
61.5
69.1
16
XAD F1
Run
3001-
3005
82.1
66.3
91.4
78.5
48.1
54.5
33.6a
44.5
50
61.0
30
Her
Run
3006-
3010
82.6
59.3
79.9
79.7
55.9
69.5
52
80.1
68.4
69.4
16
XAD
Run
4001-
4005
88.2
83
85.7
76.9
51.8
63.1
92.9
75.8
64.8
73.6
17
Filter
Run
4006-
4010
72
59.8
82.5
72.8
37a
43.4
44.8
56
46.6
57.2
26
XAD
Total
average
recovery
81.5
67.9
80.8
76.3
51.1
59.7
54.3
65.0
57.2
X RSD
5.8
14
10
6.1
14
14
34
18
14
Filter
average
recovery
84.3
69.6
81.5
74.4
52.5
80.8
60.1
61.5
55.5
% RSD
3.28
14.2
13.8
6.27
7.53
7.55
41.0
21.0
11.9
XAD
average
recovery
78.6
66.2
80.2
78.1
49.7
58.5
48.4
68.5
58.8
% RSD
5.98
14.3
2.25
4.92
18.1
18.2
6.07
14.4
15.5
Outside data quality objective limits.
-------
TABLE B-10-4. ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF XAD SPIKED BLANKS
ro
QA type (dup., MS.
MS dup.):
Reporting units:
Analytes
2,3,7,8-TCDF
2,3,7.8-TCDD
1.2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6.7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3.7.8.9-HxCDF
1,2,3,4,7.8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2.3,7,8.9-HxCDD
1,2,3.4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDD
OCDF
OCDD
Blank
P9
194
211
325
218
150
533
469
505
469
453
400
343
533
580
550
1300
1530
Avg.
194
212
324
217
150
533
469
505
469
453
400
343
534
580
550
1300
1530
P9
6630
6340
9300
6350
5100
17700
15300
17800
16800
15300
13500
16300
15500
17100
14600
34200
31000
MS
Matrix
spike
level
5998
5978
6028
5978
6098
14868
14856
15130
14814
14680
15266
15266
15002
15050
14988
30318
20412
Matrix
spike
% recovery
107.3
102.5
148. 9C
102.6
81.2
115.5
99.8
114.3
110.2
101.1
85.8
104.5
99.8
109.8
93.7
108.5
103.3
P9
6480
5750
8900
6190
4880
16900
15500
17000
16100
13900
12800
15000
15800
19700
13600
32500
30600
Matrix
spike
level
5998
5978
6028
5978
6098
14868
14856
15130
14814
14680
15286
15266
15002
15050
14988
30318
29412
MS dup
Matrix
spike
% recovery"
104.8
92.6
142. 3C
99.9
77.6
110.1
101.2
109.0
105.5
91.6
81.2
96.0
101.8
127.0C
87.1
102.9
98.8
Matrix
spike
duplicates
RPDD
2.3
9.8
4.4
2.6
4.4
4.6
1.3
4.6
4.3
9.6
5.3
8.3
1.9
14.1
7.1
5.1
4.2
a % recovery = (Amount found 1n spike - Native level average/Amount spiked) • 100.
b RPD (relative percent difference) =(Rep 1 - Rep 2)(Average of Rep 1 and Rep 2) • 100.
c Outside data quality objective limits.
NA = not analyzed or not applicable; NO = not detected.
-------
TABLE B-10-5. ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF FILTER SPIKED BLANKS
co
ro
-b
ro
QA type (dup., MS,
MS dup.):
Reporting units:
Analytes
2.3,7,8-TCDF
2,3,7,8-TCDD
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF
1.2,3,7,8-PeCOD
1,2,3, 4.7, 8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7.8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDF
1,2,3, 4,7. 8-HxCDD
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,7,8,9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCOD
OCDF
OCDD
Blank
P9
NO
ND
NO
ND
ND
20.6
ND
ND
14.6
ND
ND
16.5
ND
30.9
55.9
167
295
Avg.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
20.6
NA
NA
14.6
NA
NA
16.5
NA
30.9
55.9
167
295
P9
6680
6670
8710
6650
4840
16700
14700
16400
15600
13900
13200
15200
14400
16600
13300
34800
30600
MS
Matrix
spike
level
5998
5978
6028
5978
6098
14868
14856
15130
14814
14680
15266
15266
15002
15050
14988
30318
29412
MS dup
Matrix
spike
% recovery*
111.4
111.6
144. 5C
111.2
79.4
112.2
98.9
108.4
105.2
94.7
86.5
99.5
96.0
110.1
88.4
114.2
103.0
P9
8160
8550
9020
6360
4410
18400
14500
16800
15800
12700
11380
13900
14000
17500
14000
34500
30900
Matrix
spike
level
5998
5978
8028
5978
6098
14868
14856
15130
14814
14680
15266
15266
15002
15050
14988
30318
29412
Matrix
spike
% recovery
102.7
109.6
149. 6C
106.4
72.3
110.2
97.6
111.0
106.6
86.5
74.5
90.9
93.3
116.1
93.0
113.2
104.1
Matrix
spike
duplicates
RPDb
8.1
1.8
3.5
4.5
9.3
1.8
1.4
2.4
1.3
9.0
14.8
8.9
2.8
5.3
5.1
0.9
1.0
a % recovery = (Amount found In spike - Native level average/Amount spiked) • 100.
b RPD (relative percent difference) =(Rep 1 - Rep 2)(Average of Rep 1 and Rep 2) • 100.
c Outside data quality objective limits.
NA = not analyzed or not applicable; ND = not detected.
-------
TABLE B-10-6. ACCURACY AND PRECISION OF WATER SPIKED BLANKS
CD
I
ro
.£»
QA type (dup., MS,
MS dup.):
Reporting units:
Analytes
2,3,7.8-TCDF
2,3,7,8-TCDO
1,2,3,7,8-PeCDF
2,3.4,7.8-PeCDF
1,2.3,7,8-PeCDD
1,2,3,4,7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,6,7,8-HxCDF
2,3,4,6.7,8-HxCDF
1,2,3,7.8.9-HxCDF
1, 2.3.4, 7.8-HxCDD
1, 2,3,6,7, 8-HxCDD
1,2,3,7,8,9-HxCDD
1,2,3.4. 6,7, 8-HpCDF
1.2,3,4,7,8.9-HpCDF
1,2,3,4.6,7,8-HpCOD
OCDF
OCDO
Blank
pg
ND
NO
24.9
ND
ND
29.7
14.3
16.8
ND
ND
ND
20.4
61.6
40.6
111
244
614
Avg.
NA
NA
24.9
NA
NA
29,7
14.3
16.8
NA
NA
NA
20.4
61.6
40.6
111
244
614
P9
5920
5810
8710
7190
4260
15200
13500
15600
14400
12800
11540
12900
15200
16600
12900
32300
2800
MS
Matrix
spike
level
5998
5978
6028
5978
6098
14868
14856
15130
14814
14680
15266
15266
15002
15050
14988
30318
29412
Matrix
spike
% recovery*
98.7
97.2
144. lc
120.3
69.9
102.0
90.8
103.0
97.2
87.2
75.8
84.4
100.9
110.0
85.3
105.7
93.1
P9
6630
6610
9280
8580
4520
16200
14700
15300
14600
12900
12100
14700
14700
17300
14300
32700
30200
Matrix
spike
level
5998
5978
6028
5978
6098
14868
14856
15130
14814
14680
15266
15266
15002
15050
14988
30318
29412
MS dup
Matrix
spike
% recovery*
110.5
110.6
153.5C
110.1
74.1
108.8
98.9
101.0
98.6
87.9
79.3
96.2
97.6
114.7
94.7
107.1
100.6
Matrix
spike
duplicates
RPDD
11.3
12.9
6.3
8.9
5.9
6.4
8.5
1.9
1.4
0.8
4.7
13.0
3.3
4.1
10.3
1.2
7.6
a % recovery = (Amount found 1n spike - Native level average/Amount spiked) • 100.
b RPD (relative percent difference) =(Rep 1 - Rep 2)(Average of Rep 1 and Rep 2) • 100.
c Outside data quality objective limits.
NA = not"analyzed or not applicable; ND = not detected.
-------
TABLE B-10-9. 6C/MS SCREEN DATA SUMMARY FOR SAMPLE 1011-1015
Total extract volume (mL):
Split volume (mL): 5
Final split volume (mL): 1
10
No.
Amount surrogate spike
D10-Pyrene: 394
Dij-2-Chlorophenol: 400
IS area: 454.457
Detection limit: 20 total vga
Compound
Total area
Sample amount0
(pg)
Surrogate
recovery
2 D10-Pyrene .
3 Dij-2-Chlorophenor
61 D1-n-butyl phthalate
71 B1s(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
1037216
0
20426
73761
264.6
0.0
9.0
32.5
67.2%
0.0%
NA
NA
Nontarget majors
Scan
748
1229
778
979
1240
Compound
Methyl phenol
Substituted benzene
Phenyl ethanone
Ethyl phenyl ethanone
B1s-ethaned1yl benzene
Cone.
(wgM)
110
46
6
7.4
35
Sample amount Surrogate
(pg)
220
92
12
14.8
70
recovery
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
All compounds with areas less than 10% of the Internal standard are
considered to be below the stated detection Hm1t. All of .the target
analytes monitored are listed separately.
The filament on the mass spectrometer was turned on too late to detect this
compound. This was due to the use of toluene 1n the sample extracts, which
burned out the filament several times.
Sample
(Total area • 100 • Final split vol. • Total extract vol.)
amount (pg) (IS area • RRF • Split volume)
where RRF = 1 except for surrogates.
B-246
-------
TABLE B-10-10. 6C/MS SCREEN DATA SUMMARY FOR SAMPLE 2001-2005
Total extract volume (mL):
Split volume (mL): 5
Final split volume (mL): 1
10
Amount surrogate spike (uq)
Dio-Pyrene: 394
Di»-2-Chloropheno1: 400
IS area: 336.527
Detection limit: 20 total yg
a
No.
Compound
Total area
Sample amount0 Surrogate
(yg) recovery
2
3
35
42
61
71
0,0-Pyrene .
Di»-2-ChlorophenolD
Dlphenyl
Dlbenzofuran
D1-n-butyl phthalate
B1s(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
871752
0
47586
126490
27166
68199
300.3
0.0
28.3
75.2
16.1
40.5
76. 2%
0.0*
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nontarget majors
Scan Compound
757
767
789
1247
1258
Methyl phenol
Methyl phenol
Methyl phenol
Methyl phenylmethyl benzene
Methyl phenylmethyl benzene
Cone. Sample amount0
(yg/mL) (yg)
320
58
150
160
57
640
116
300
320
114
Surrogate
recovery
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
All compounds with areas less than 10* of the Internal standard are
considered to be below the stated detection limit. All of the target
analytes monitored are listed separately.
The filament on the mass spectrometer was turned on too late to detect this
compound. This was due to the use of toluene 1n the sample extracts, which
burned out the filament several times.
Sample _ (Total area • 100 • Final split vol. • Total extract vol.)
amount (yg) " (IS area • RRF • Split volume)
where RRF « 1 except for surrogates.
B-247
-------
TABLE B-10-13. GC/MS SCREEN DATA SUMMARY FOR SAMPLE 3006-3010
Total extract volume (mL): 10
Split volume (mL): 2.5
Final split volume (mL): 1
Amount surrogate spike (yg)
D10-Pyrene: 394
D^-2-Chlorophenol: 400
No.
IS area: 278.781
Detection limit: 40 total vga
Compound
Total area
Sample amount
(vg)
Surrogate
recovery
2 D10-Pyrene .
3 Di,-2-Chlorophenor
71 B1s(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
351046
0
222088
292.0
0.0
318.7
74.1%
0.0%
NA
Nontarget majors
Scan Compound
894
905
1032
1863
1256
Benzaldehyde
Dimethyl ethoxy toluene
Alkane
Substituted benzene
Methyl phenylmethyl benzene
Cone.
(ug/mL)
57
120
1600
220
100
Sample amount0
(yg)
228
480
6400
880
400
Surrogate
recovery
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
a
All compounds with areas less than 10X of the Internal standard are
considered to be below the stated detection limit. All of the target
analytes monitored are listed separately.
The filament on the mass spectrometer was turned on too late to detect this
compound. This was due to the use of toluene 1n the sample extracts, which
burned out the filament several times.
Sample
amount (ug)
where RRF *
(Total area • 100 • Final split vol. • Total extract vol.)
(IS area
1 except for surrogates.
RR
Split volume)
B-250
-------
TABLE B-10-14. GC/MS SCREEN DATA SUMMARY FOR SAMPLE 4001-4005
Total extract volume (mL):
Split volume (mL): 2.5
Final split volume (mL): 1
10
No.
Compound
Amount surrogate spike (uq)
D,0-Pyrene: 394
Dit-2-Chlorophenol: 400
IS area: 370.980
Detection limit: 40 total pgc
Total area
Sample amount*"
Surrogate
recovery
2 D10-Pyrene .
3 D^-2-Chlorophenor
71 B1s(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
344368
0
117158
215.3
0.0
126.3
54.6%
0.0%
NA
Nontarget majors
Scan Compound
756
726
785
1024
765
Methyl phenol
Substituted benzene
Methyl phenol
Alkane
Methyl phenol
Cone. Sample amount0
(vg/mL) (pg)
380
30
55
1300
27
1520
120
220
5200
108
Surrogate
recovery
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
All compounds with areas less than 10* of the Internal standard are
considered to be below the stated detection limit. All of the target
analytes monitored are listed separately.
The filament on the mass spectrometer was turned on too late to detect this
compound. This was due to the use of toluene 1n the sample extracts, which
burned out the filament several times.
Sample (Total area
amount (vg) (IS area
where RRF » 1 except for surrogates.
100 • Final split vol. • Total extract vol.)
5P11
V •
RRF • Split volume)
B-251
-------
TABLE B-10-15. GC/MS SCREEN DATA SUMMARY FOR SAMPLE 5001-5005
Total extract volume (ml): 10
Split volume (ml): 5
Final split volume (mL): 1
Amount surrogate spike (»g)
D10-Pyrene: 394
Di»-2-Chlorophenol: 400
No.
Compound
IS area: 340.186
Detection limit: 20 total
Total area
Sample amount
(yg)
Surrogate
recovery
2 D10-Pyrene .
3 Di»-2-ChlorophenolD
71 B1s(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
720208
0
146269
245.5
0.0
86.0
62.3%
0.0%
NA
Nontarget majors
Scan Compound
757
888
715
923
919
Methyl phenol
Substituted benzene
Trlmethyl benzene
Benzothlophene + unknown
Methyl benzaldehyde
Cone. Sample amount0
(wg/mL) (yg)
98
23
35
43
28
196
46
70
86
56
Surrogate
recovery
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
All compounds with areas less than 10% of the Internal standard are
considered to be below the stated detection limit. All of the target
analytes monitored are listed separately.
The filament on the mass spectrometer was turned on too late to detect this
compound. This was due to the use of toluene 1n the sample extracts, which
burned out the filament several times.
Sample
amount (i»g)
where RRF =
(Total area • 100 • Final split vol. • Total extract vol.)
(IS area
1 except for surrogates.
RRF • Split volume)
B-252
-------
TABLE B-10-16. GC/MS SCREEN DATA SUMMARY FOR SAMPLE 5006-5010
Total extract volume (mL):
Split volume (mL): 5
Final split volume (mL): 1
10
Amount surrogate spike
D10-Pyrene: 394
D i,-2-Ch 1 oropheno 1: 400
IS area: 322.369
Detection limit: 20 total wga
No.
Compound
Total area
Sample amount0 Surrogate
(vg) recovery
2
3
Dlo-Pyrene .
Dt»-2-Chloropheno1°
870250
0
313.0
0.0
79. 4*
0.0*
Nontarget majors
Scan Compound
760
881
714
897
2114
Methyl phenol
Substituted benzene
Unknown compound
Benzaldehyde
Unknown
Cone. Sample amount0
(ygM) (vg)
94
68
35
43
23
188
136
70
86
46
Surrogate
recovery
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
All compounds with areas less than 10* of the Internal standard are
considered to be below the stated detection limit. All of the target
analytes monitored are listed separately.
The filament on the mass spectrometer was turned on too late to detect this
compound. This was due to the use of toluene 1n the sample extracts, which
burned out the filament several times.
Sample _ (Total area • 100 • Final split vol. • Total extract vol.)
amount (wg) (IS area • RRF • Split volume)
where RRF = 1 except for surrogates.
B-253
-------
TABLE B-10-17. PERCENT SURROGATE RECOVERIES (SVO)
Sample
Filter blank"
Water blank
XAO blank
1001-1005
1006-1010
1011-1015
2001-2005
2006-2010
3001-3005
3006-1010
4001-4005
4006-4010
5001-5005
5006-5010
Dio-Pyrene
91.8
86.6
85.8
75.1
80.4
67.2
76.2
72.8
10. la
74.1
54.6
50.6
62.3
79.4
DH-2-Chlorophenol
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Spiked on
Filter
XAD
Condensate
FH/BH
FH/BH
Filter
XAD
XAD
Filter
Condensate
Condensate
Average recovery
Total
% RSO
Filter
Range %
XAO
Range %
FH/BH
Range %
Condensate
Range %
69.1
28.8
62.9
39. Oa
69.7
37. Oa
74.5
4.56
69.6
24.6
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
a
Did not meet DQOs.
B-254
-------
TABLE B-10-18. GC/MS SCREEN DATA SUMMARY FOR XAD BLANK
Total extract volume (mL): 10
Split volume (mL): 2.5
Final split volume (mL): 1
Amount surrogate spike (yq)
D10-Pyrene: 394
Di,-2-Ch1orophenol: 400
No.
IS area: 248.178
Detection limit: 40 total wga
Compound
Total area
Sample amount0 Surrogate
(wg) recovery
2
3
71
D10-Pyrene .
Di,-2-Chlorophenor
B1s(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
361752
0
24137
338.0
0.0
38.9
85.8%
0.0%
NA
Nontarget majors
Scan Compound
752
1036
715
815
908
Methyl phenol
Alkane
Trlmethyl benzene
Butyl benzene
Benzole add
Cone.
(yg/raL)
37
2700
13
5.1
27
Sample amount0
(wg)
148
10800
52
20.4
108
Surrogate
recovery
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
All compounds with areas less than 10* of the Internal standard are
considered to be below the stated detection limit. All of the target
analytes monitored are listed separately.
The filament on the mass spectrometer was turned on too late to detect this
compound. This was due to the use of toluene in the sample extracts, which
burned out the filament several times.
Sample m (Total area • 100 • Final
amount (wg) (IS area •
where RRF * 1 except for surrogates.
split vol. • Total extract vol.)
RRF • Split volume)
B-255
-------
TABLE B-10-19. GC/MS SCREEN DATA SUMMARY FOR FILTER BLANK
Total extract volume (mL): 10
Split volume (mL): 2.5
Final split volume (mL): 1
Amount surrogate spike
D10-Pyrene: 394
Di^Z-Chlorophenol: 400
IS area: 234.672
Detection limit: 40 total »iga
No.
Compound
Total area
Sample amount0 Surrogate
(ug) recovery
2
3
D10-Pyrene .
Di»-2-Chlorophenor
366190
0
361.8
0.0
91.8*
0.0%
Nontarget majors
Scan Compound
711
749
873
919
1037
Trlmethyl benzene
Methyl phenol
Substituted benzene
Alkane
Alkane
Cone.
(ug/mL)
27
12
15
3100
13
Sample amount0
(ug)
108
84
60
12400
52
Surrogate
recovery
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
All compounds with areas less than 10% of the Internal standard are
considered to be below the stated detection limit. All of the target
analytes monitored are listed separately.
The filament on the mass spectrometer was turned on too late to detect this
compound. This was due to the use of toluene 1n the sample extracts, which
burned out the filament several times.
Sample
amount (yg)
where RRF »
(Total area • 100 • Final split vol. • Total extract vol.)
(IS area
1 except for surrogates.
RRF • Split volume)
B-256
-------
TABLE B-10-20. GC/MS SCREEN DATA SUMMARY FOR WATER BLANK
Total extract volume (mL): 10 Amount surrogate spike (ug)
Split volume (mL): 2.5 D10-Pyrene: 394
Final split volume (mL): 1 Di»-2-Chlorophenol: 400
IS area: 275.288
Detection limit: 40 total uga
Sample amount0 Surrogate
No. Compound Total area (ug) recovery
2
3
Dio-Pyrene .
DH-2-Chlorophenor
405163
0
Nontarget majors
Scan
753
878
1040
714
1249
Compound
Methylphenol
Substituted benzene
Alkane
Substituted benzene
Substituted benzene
Cone.
(ug/mL)
35
44
27
24
16
341.3
0.0
Sample amount0
(wg)
140
176
108
96
64
86.6%
0.0%
Surrogate
recovery
NA
NA
NA
NA
NS
All compounds with areas less than 10* of the Internal standard are
considered to be below the stated detection limit. All of the target
analytes monitored are listed separately.
The filament on the mass spectrometer was turned on too late to detect this
compound. This was due to the use of toluene 1n the sample extracts, which
burned out the filament several times.
c Sample m (Total area • 100 • Final split vol. • Total extract vol.)
amount (ug) (IS area • RRF • Split volume)
where RRF - 1 except for surrogates.
B-257
-------
APPENDIX C
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
C-l
-------
SUMMARY OF QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS
This appendix describes the audits conducted during this work assignment.
All audits were conducted by T. Dux, the Quality Assurance Coordinator (QAC)
for this work assignment. All audits were reported to the program Quality
Assurance Manager, C. Green, the Program Manager, T. Ferguson, the Work
Assignment Manager, A. Trenholm, and appropriate line management and work
assignment task leaders.
Audits of Field Activities
There were three audits of field activities. First, a technical systems
audit was conducted of all field operations done on 10/29/89, Run 2. Second,
an audit of the data quality associated with the field sampling operations was
done by reviewing the field sampling records and resulting calculations.
Third, an audit of the data quality of the field GC results was done by
reviewing the supporting records and final calculations.
Technical Systems Audit of Field Operatlons--
Scope of the audit—The audit was conducted on 10/29/89, Run 2; the QAC
was present from Initial setup to final disposition of samples. During the
audit, the QAC compared actual field operations to the specifications 1n the
applicable methods and the draft test/QA plan, plus the comments from the EPA
reviewers. Specific audit forms with applicable questions/observations were
generated for this audit and filled out on-s1te. After the audit, the quali-
fications of all sampling personnel were verified by checking corporate
records.
The following specific operations were observed:
Sampling of raw meal
Sampling of waste feed
Delivery of waste feed, both solid and liquid
VOST sampling by Method 0030
SVOST sampling by Method 0010
M3 sampling
MS sampling
MM5 sampling for hydrogen chloride
Calibration of field GC
Calibration of THC
Disassembly and storage of the MM5 train components
Disassembly and storage of VOST condensate and cartridges
Collection of plant operating data
Audit results—In general, all field operations were conducted 1n
accordance withthe methodology and the draft test/QA plan. Personnel
appeared to be well trained and competent. There was sufficient Information
recorded 1n most cases to completely support the data generated during this
demonstration test. Most calibration, leak checks, and associated QA proce-
dures and Information were well within criteria.
C-3
-------
Audit of Data Quality of Field Sampling and Associated Calibrations and
Calculations—
Scope of the audit—The raw data and calculations associated with field
sampling were examined by the QAC and compared to the test plan for compliance
to planned methodology and achievement of project objectives. All Information
and data for Run 3 sampling of the main duct emissions (semivolatile, hydrogen
chloride, volatile, and Orsat), raw meal, liquid waste, solid waste, and ESP
dust were reviewed and traced through the project records. This was done to
verify the reported results of Rjn 3 sampling and to establish that analytical
results are traceable to valid field samples. Project records were reviewed
to determine if the overall conduct of the test met project requirements.
Audit results—The samples of raw meal and ESP dust were traceable and
generated in accordance with project requirements. The Orsat samples and
analytical results were traceable and were in accordance with method require-
ments. The hydrogen chloride, semlvolatlle samples (MM5 train), and volatile
samples (VOST) were generated in accordance with project and method require-
ments. Some difficulties were noted during the audit concerning HC1
calculations and field equipment calibration records. These topics were
reported to project and line management and corrected before the test report
was finalized.
Audit of Data Quality of Field GC Sampling and Analysis—
Scope of the audit—This audit concerned field analyses for organics
which are chromatographable and can be detected with a flame ionization
detector. Samples were taken from the main and bypass ducts and introduced
directly Into the GC for analysis. Quantitatlon was done using a reference
standard of propane, and a standard containing C7 and C17 hydrocarbons was
used to separate data Into a Cl-7 fraction and a C7-17 fraction.
The raw data and summary results were examined and compared to the test
plan for compliance to planned methodology and achievement of project objec-
tives. All information and data for Run 3 sampling were reviewed and traced
through the project records to verify the reported results. Calculations were
manually checked.
Results of the audit—The audit indicated that standards, blanks, and
linearity standards were analyzed and met objectives, and that final sample
data were traceable and correctly calculated. In general, project objectives
were met, and any analysis difficulties are discussed 1n the technical portion
of this report.
Audit of Data Quality for Semivolatile. Dioxin/Furan. and Gravimetric
Determinations of Stack Gas Samples
Scope of the Audit—
The objective of these determinations was to characterize the
semlvolatHe organic fraction of a stack gas sample by determining the amount
of polychlorinated dlbenzodioxins and dlbenzofurans (PCDD/F) by GC/MS
identifying the major semivolatile (SVO) components by GC/MS, and determining
C-4
-------
organic residue by gravimetric analysis. Sampling train components were
extracted with three solvents, and the three extracts were combined Into a
single sample which was split Into three fractions, one each for PCDD/F, SVO,
and gravimetric analysis. The reported data consist of total organic residue
results, PCOO/F data for specific Isomers and total homologs, plus qualitative
results for the SVO analysis for compounds listed 1n EPA Method 1625 and the
five major components of the SVO fraction. The analytical methodology was
based on EPA procedures.
The analysis summary, project records, and raw data were examined by the
QAC and compared to the test plan and 12/13/89 memo (Trenholm to Hlustlck) for
compliance to planned methodology and achievement of project objectives. All
Information and data for Initial and continuing calibration, surrogate recov-
eries, field blanks, system blanks, GC/MS logbook entries, sample preparation,
and standard preparation were reviewed in detail. One train, Run 3 bypass
duct (samples 3006-3010), was traced through the project records, and sample
results were verified by hand calculation.
Audit Results—
For PCDD/F and gravimetric analyses, the results and supporting
documentation for the PCDD/F meet project requirements and objectives.
Holding times were met; calibration criteria were met; all sample results for
PCDD/F surrogates, matrix spike, and spike duplicates met precision and
accuracy criteria. A calculation error was noted with the gravimetric
analyses and corrected before sample data were finalized.
The results for SVO analysis did not meet some of the project
requirements. Following are the main QA topics of the audit:
• Some sample preparation and analysis holding times were exceeded by
a short time; however, the results were not compromised.
• SVO calibration procedures were different from those specified 1n
the test plan, but the calibration procedure was satisfactory.
There were two surrogates for SVO analysis, one base-neutral and one
acidic surrogate. Results were not obtained for the acidic
surrogate because of solvent Interferences which are explained in
technical report, Appendix B.
All difficulties noted during the audit were reported to project and line
manaaement for consideration and resolution. All pertinent topics concerning
analysis difficulties are discussed 1n the technical portion of this report.
Appendix B.
Audit of Data Quality for Volatile Organic Determinations in Stack Gas Samples
SC°PeTh1s audit covered the volatile organic analysis (VOST) for the principal
oraanic hazardous constituent (POHC), chlorobenzene, and the major volatile
rnmnonents 1n the stack gas. For VOST, there was a quantitative chlorobenzene
analysis, a semi quantitative volatile compound report (identification and
C-5
-------
semiquantltation of all compounds on the EPA Method 1624 target analyte 11st),
and a qualitative tentatively identified compound analysis (reporting of five
largest peaks). The analytical methodology was based upon SW-846 procedures.
The project records and raw data were examined by the QAC and compared to
the test plan and the 12/13/89 memo (Trenholm to Hlustick) for compliance with
planned methodology and achievement of project objectives. All data for
Initial and continuing calibration, surrogate recoveries, field blanks, system
blanks, performance samples, and GC/MS logbook entries were reviewed in
detail. One sample, 4040, was traced through the project records *-o verify
sample results.
Audit Results—
In general, the data were generated according to project specifications
and meet project objectives. The records were organized, traceable, and
relatively complete. The majority of calibration criteria were met, as were
applicable surrogate accuracy and precision objectives. Samples were analyzed
within holding times. Blanks demonstrated that operations were generally free
from contamination. Due to a sample handling problem, a few VOST field blanks
were not analyzed; however, other field blanks showed that there were no
contamination problems. A few analysis problems and one calculation error
were reported to project and line management for consideration. The
calculation error was corrected, and analysis difficulties are discussed 1n
Appendix B-9.
Performance Audit Samples
Two performance audit samples were prepared. An EPA certified standard
of the POHC, chlorobenzene, was diluted in methanol (50 ug/mL level) and
analyzed following Instrument .calibration. A potassium chloride reference
solution was diluted to two levels (7 and 0.7 g/L). Results for chloro-
benzene, potassium, and chloride are reported in the technical portions of
this report. Accuracy results were within the objectives specified 1n the
test plan: 60* to 120* of the reference value for chlorobenzene and 90% to
110* for chloride.
C-6
-------
|