v
                                FIELD VERIFICATION PROGRAM
                                    (AQUATIC DISPOSAL)


                                   TECHNICAL REPORT D-85-9


                  CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION

                  OF  BLACK  ROCK  HARBOR DREDGED  MATERIAL

                                             by

                             Peter F. Rogerson,  Steven C. Schimmel
                                       Gerald  Hoffman

                               US  Environmental Protection Agency
                               Environmental Research Laboratory
                                Narragansett, Rhode Island  02882
                                       September 1985
                                        Final Report
                               Approved For Public Release; Distribution Unlimited
                             Prepared for DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
                                 US Army Corps of Engineers
                                 Washington, DC  20314-1000
                             and  US Environmental Protection Agency
                                    Washington, DC   20460
                               Monitored by Environmental  Laboratory
                         US Army Engineer Waterways  Experiment Station
                          PO Box 631, Vicksburg, Mississippi  39180-0631

-------
   Destroy this report when  no longer needed. Do  not  return
                      it to the originator.
The findings in this  report are not to  be construed as an official
     Department  of  the Army position unless so designated
                by other authorized documents.
       The contents of this report  are  not to be used  for
        advertising, publication, or  promotional  purposes.
         Citation of trade names does  not constitute an
         official endorsement or approval of the use of
                  such  commercial products.
       The D-series of reports  includes publications of the
          Environmental Effects of Dredging Programs:
             Dredging Operations Technical Support.
           Long-Term Effects of Dredging  Operations
       Interagency Field Verification of Methodologies for
        Evaluating Dredged Material  Disposal Alternatives
                  (Field Verification Program)

-------
SUBJECT:  Transmittal of Field Verification Program Technical Report Entitled
          "Chemical and Biological Characterization of Black Rock Harbor
          Dredged Material"

TO:  All Report Recipients
1.  This is one in a series of scientific reports documenting the findings of
studies conducted under the Interagency Field Verification of Testing and
Predictive Methodologies for Dredged Material Disposal Alternatives (referred
to as the Field Verification Program or FVP).  This program is a comprehensive
evaluation of environmental effects of dredged material disposal under condi-
tions of upland and aquatic disposal and wetland creation.

2.  The FVP originated out of the mutual need of both the Corps of Engineers
(Corps) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to continually improve
the technical basis for carrying out their shared regulatory missions.  The
program is an expansion of studies proposed by EPA to the US Army Engineer
Division, New England (NED), in support of its regulatory and dredging mis-
sions related to dredged material disposal into Long Island Sound.  Discus-
sions among the Corps' Waterways Experiment Station (WES), NED, and the EPA
Environmental Research Laboratory (EKLN) in Narragansett, RI, made it clear
that a dredging project at Black Rock Harbor in Bridgeport, CT, presented a
unique opportunity for simultaneous evaluation of aquatic disposal, upland
disposal, and wetland creation using the same dredged material.  Evaluations
were to be based on technology existing within the two agencies or developed
during the six-year life of the program.

3.  The program is generic in nature and will provide techniques and inter-
pretive approaches applicable to evaluation of many dredging and disposal
operations.  Consequently, while the studies will provide detailed site-
specific information on disposal of material dredged from Black Rock Harbor,
they will also have great national significance for the Corps and EPA.

4.  The FVP is designed to meet both Agencies' needs to document the effects
of disposal under various conditions, provide verification of the predictive
accuracy of evaluative techniques now in use, and provide a basis for deter-
mining the degree to which biological response is correlated with bioaccumula-
tion of key contaminants in the species under study.  The latter is an
important aid in interpreting potential biological consequences of bioaccumu-
lation.  The program also meets EPA mission needs by providing an opportunity
to document the application of a generic predictive hazard-assessment research
strategy applicable to all wastes disposed in the aquatic environment.  There-
fore, the ERLN initiated exposure-assessment studies at the aquatic disposal
site.  The Corps-sponsored studies on environmental consequences of aquatic
disposal will provide the effects assessment necessary to complement the EPA-
sponsored exposure assessment, thereby allowing ERLN to develop and apply a
hazard-assessment strategy.  While not part of the Corps-funded FVP, the EPA
exposure assessment studies will complement the Corps' work, and together the
Corps and the EPA studies will satisfy the needs of both agencies.

-------
SUBJECT:  Transmittal of Field Verification Program Technical Report Entitled
          "Chemical and Biological Characterization of Black Rock Harbor
          Dredged Material"
5.  In recognition of the potential national significance, the Office, Chief
of Engineers, approved and funded the studies in January 1982.  The work is
managed through the Environmental Laboratory's Environmental Effects of
Dredging Programs at WES.  Studies of the effects of upland disposal and
wetland creation are being conducted by WES and studies of aquatic disposal
are being carried out by the ERLN, applying techniques worked out at the
laboratory for evaluating sublethal effects of contaminants on aquatic organ-
isms.  These studies are funded by the Corps while salary, support facilities,
etc., are provided by EPA.  The EPA funding to support the exposure-assessment
studies followed in 1983; the exposure-assessment studies are managed and
conducted by ERLN.

6.  The Corps and EPA are pleased at the opportunity to conduct cooperative
research and believe that the value in practical implementation and improve-
ment of environmental regulations of dredged material disposal will be con-
siderable.  The studies conducted under this program are scientific in nature
and will be published in the scientific literature as appropriate and in a
series of Corps technical reports.  The EPA will publish findings of the
exposure-assessment studies in the scientific literature and in EPA report
series.  The FVP will provide the scientific basis upon which regulatory
recommendations will be made and upon which changes in regulatory implementa-
tion, and perhaps regulations themselves, will be based.  However, the docu-
ments produced by the program do not in themselves constitute regulatory
guidance from either agency.  Regulatory guidance will be provided under
separate authority after appropriate technical and administrative assessment
of the overall findings of the entire program.
      Choromokos, Jr., Ph.D., P.E.
Director, Research and Development
U. S. Army Corps of Engineers
Bernard D. Goldstein, M.D.
Assistant Administrator for
Research and Development
U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency

-------
   	Unclassified	
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGE (When Data Entered)
            REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
                                                          READ INSTRUCTIONS
                                                       BEFORE COMPLETING FORM
 1. REPORT NUMBER

 Technical Report  D-85-9
                                  2. GOVT ACCESSION NO
                                                       3. RECIPIENT'S CATALOG NUMBER
4.  TITLE (and Subtitle)

 CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF
 BLACK ROCK HARBOR DREDGED MATERIAL
                                                   5. TYPE OF REPORT & PERIOD COVERED

                                                   Final report
                                                       6. PERFORMING ORG. REPORT NUMBER
7. AUTHORO)

Peter F. Rogerson,  Steven C. Schimmel,
Gerald Hoffman
                                                   8. CONTRACT OR GRANT NUMBERfa.)
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
US Environmental  Protection Agency
Environmental Research Laboratory
Narragansett. Rhode Island  02882
                                                   10. PROGRAM ELEMENT, PROJECT, TASK
                                                      AREA & WORK UNIT NUMBERS

                                                   Field Verification Program
                                                   (Aquatic Disposal)
It. CONTROLLING OFFICE NAME AND ADDRESS
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,  US Army Corps of Engineers,
Washington, DC   20314-1000 and US Environmental
Protection Agency,  Washington. DC   20460	
                                                   12. REPORT DATE
                                                   September  1985
                                                   13. NUMBER OF PAGES
                                                   123
 14. MONITORING AGENCY NAME & AODRESSf/f different from Controlling O(llce)
 US Army Engineer  Waterways Experiment  Station
 Environmental Laboratory
 PO Box 631, Vicksburg,  Mississippi  39180-0631
                                                   15.  SECURITY CLASS, (of thlm report)
                                                   Unclassified
                                                      DECLASSIFICATION/DOWN GRADING
                                                      SCHEDULE
16. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of thfa Report)

Approved for public  release; distribution unlimited.
 17. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT (of Ota abstract entered In Block 30, It different from Report)
 IB. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
Available from National Technical Information Service,  5285 Port Royal Road,
Springfield, Virginia   22161.  Appendix B was prepared  on microfiche and  is
enclosed in an envelope attached to  the back cover of this report.
19. KEY WORDS (Continue on revere* tide II neceuary and Identify by block number)
Dredging—Connecticut—Black Rock Harbor   (LC)
Black Rock Harbor (Conn.)   (LC)
Marine  sediments—Analysis   (LC)
Dredged material  (WES)
Aquatic biology  (LC)
20. ABSTRACT fCantBaum «ra rererea ttit* It rocwuir and Identity by block number)
      Black Rock Harbor,  Bridgeport, Conn.,  dredged material contained substan-
tial  concentrations  of both organic and  inorganic contaminants, many of which
were  shown to be biologically available  to the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis,  in
a  laboratory bioassay.   Tissue,PCB concentrations were  44% of the concentration
found in the sediment (6800 ng/g), while tissue concentrations of parent  poly-
nuclear hydrocarbons were 28% of  sediment  concentrations  that ranged up to
9800  ng/g.  Also present in the sediment were Cu, Cr, Zn,  Pb, Ni, Cd, and
                                             	.	(Continued)
DD,
FORM
JAN 73
1473
EDITION OF t NOV SS IS OBSOLETE
                                                       Unclassified
                                            SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PA!>E (Whm Date Entered)

-------
  	Unclassified	
SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEfHTien D»t* Entered;
 20.   ABSTRACT (Continued).


 Hg at 2380,  1430, 1200, 380, 140, 23, and  1.7 Pg/g,  respectively.   Of these,
 Cu,  Cr,  Pb,  Ni,  and Cd accumulated in the mussels.

      In  acute solid phase toxicity tests,  the sediment  was lethal  to only one
 of the eleven species tested, Aropelisca abdita, although  behavioral changes
 were observed in two additional species, both infaunal  species.  No effect was
 noted with epibenthic or water column species in  either solid phase or in
 combination with suspended particulate phase.
      This investigation is the first phase in developing  field-verified bio-
 assessment evaluations for the Corps of Engineers and the US  Environmental,
 Protection Agency regulatory program for dredged  material disposal.  This
 report is not suitable for regulatory purposes; however,  appropriate assessment
 methodologies that are field verified will be available at the conclusion of
 this program.
                                            	Unclassified	
                                        SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF THIS PAGEfHTi.n DM* Enlar«f>

-------
                                PREFACE






     This report describes work performed by the U.S. Environmental




Protection Agency (EPA) Environmental Research Laboratory, Narragansett,




R.I.  (ERLN), as part of the Interagency Field Verification of Testing




and Predictive Methodologies for Dredged Material Disposal Alternatives




Program (Field Verification Program (FVP)).  This Program is sponsored




by the Office, Chief of Engineers (OCE), and is assigned to the U.S. Army




Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (WES), under the purview of the




Environmental Laboratory's (EL) Environmental Effects of Dredging Pro-




grams (EEDP).  The OCE Technical Monitors for FVP were Drs. William L.




Klesch and Robert J. Pierce.  The objective of this interagency program




is to field verify existing predictive techniques for evaluating the




environmental consequences of dredged material disposal under aquatic,




wetland, and upland conditions.  The aquatic portion of the FVP study




is being conducted by ERLN, with the wetland and upland portions con-




ducted by WES.




     The principal ERLN investigators for this aquatic study were




Drs. Peter Rogerson and Gerald Hoffman, Analytical Chemists, and Mr.




Steven Schimmel, Aquatic Toxicologist.  Laboratory exposure system




design was coordinated by Mr. Jay Sinnett, Ms. Dianne Black, Dr. Wayne




Davis, and Mr. John Sewall.  Organic chemical sample preparation and




analysis were conducted by Ms. Sharon Pavignano, Mr. Larry LeBlanc,




Ms. Adria Elskus, Mr. Robert Bowen, and Mr. Curt Norwood under the




supervision  of Drs. Rogerson and James Lake.  Inorganic chemical prepa-




ration and analysis was conducted under the supervision of Dr. Gerald




Hoffman, and assisted by Mr. Frank Osterman, Mr. Warren Boothman, and

-------
Mr. Dennis Migneault.  Biological testing was conducted by Dr. John

Scott, Dr. Paul Schauer, Mr. Walter Berry, Ms. Suzanne Lussier Gentile,

Ms. Michele Redmond, Ms. Melissa Hughes, Dr. Chris Deacutis, Dr. Grace

MacPhee, and Ms. Ann Kuhn.  Data management and analysis was conducted

by Mr. Jeffery Rosen.

     The EPA Technical Director for the FVP was Dr. John H. Gentile;  the

Technical Coordinator was Mr. Walter Galloway; and the Project Manager

was Mr. Allan Beck.

     The study was conducted under the direct management of Drs. Thomas M.

Dillon and Richard K. Peddicord of the Contaminant Mobility and Criteria

Group (CMCG), Ecosystem Research and Simulation Division (ERSD), EL;

and under the general management of Dr. Charles R. Lee, Chief, CMCG,

Mr. Donald L. Robey, Chief, ERSD, and Dr. John Harrison, Chief, EL.  The

FVP Coordinator was Mr. Robert L. Lazor, and the Program Managers were

Mr. Charles C. Calhoun, Jr., and Dr. Robert M. Engler.  The report was

edited by Ms. Jamie W. Leach of the WES Publications and Graphic Arts

Division.

     During preparation of this report, COL Tilford C. Creel, CE, and

COL Robert C. Lee, CE, were Commanders and Directors of WES and Mr. F. R.

Brown was Technical Director.  At the time of publication, COL Allen F.

Grum, USA, was Director and Dr. Robert W. Whalin was Technical Director.

     This report should be cited as follows:

     Rogerson, P.F., Schimmel, S.C., and Hoffman, G.  1985.
     "Chemical and Biological Characterization of Black Rock
     Harbor Dredged Material," Technical Report D-85-9, prepared
     by US Environmental Protection Agency, Narragansett, R.I.,
     for the US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station,
     Vicksburg, Miss.

-------
                                 CONTENTS

                                                                    Page

PREFACE 	     1

LIST OF FIGURES 	     4

LIST OF TABLES	,	     6

PART I:  INTRODUCTION 	     8
       Background 	     8
       Purpose	*	     8
       Scope 	     9

PART II:  GENERAL METHODS AND MATERIALS 	    12
       Sediment Collection and Preservation 	    13
       Sediment Dosing System 	    16

PART III:  CHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION METHODS AND MATERIALS 	    20
       Contaminant Uptake Test	    20
       Sample Preparation	    25
       Sample Analysis	    32

PART IV:  BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION METHODS AND MATERIALS 	    36
       Overview	    36
       Annelids 	    40
       Molluscs	    43
       Arthropods 	    47
       Fishes 	    52

PART V:  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION .	    61
       Chemical Characterization 	    61
       Biological Characterization 	    90

PART VI:  CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 	   104

REFERENCES	   108

APPENDIX A: CHEMICAL DATA	    Al

APPENDIX B: ACUTE TOXICITY DATA SHEETS*	    Bl
 * Appendix B  was  prepared  on microfiche and is enclosed  in an envelope
 attached to  the  back cover of  this  report.

-------
                              LIST OF FIGURES

No.                                                                 Page

 1     Principal components of sediment characterization	 13

 2     Central Long Island Sound disposal site and South
       reference site	 14

 3     Black Rock Harbor, Connecticut, source of dredged material... 16

 4     Sediment dosing system with chilled water bath and argon
       gas supply	 18

 5     Suspended sediment feedback control loop and strip
       chart recorder	 19

 6     Blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) contaminant uptake system	 21

 7     Suspended sediment dilution system, distribution chamber,
       and exposure chambers used for acute toxicity .tests	39

 8     Distribution and exposure chambers used for solid phase
       and suspended particulate phase exposure of Yoldia limatula,
       Mulinia lateralis, and Ampelisca abdita	46

 9     Total ion current profiles of the 28-day exposed mussels
       analyzed by GC-MS with a 4°/min (50-330) temperature
       programming rate	 62

10     Total ion current profiles of the 28-day control mussels
       analyzed by GC-MS with a 4°/min (50-330) temperature
       programming rate	63

11     Total ion current profiles of the Black Rock Harbor
       FVP reference sediment analyzed by GC-MS with a
       4°/min (50-330) temperature programming rate	72

12     Concentration of PAH compounds in Black Rock Harbor sediment
       and exposed and control mussels	 75

13     Concentration of sum of C-l through C-4 alkyl homologs
       of PAH's measured in Black Rock Harbor sediment
       and control and exposed mussels	76

14     Distribution of Cr versus Fe in mussels from the
       Black Rock Harbor exposure	•	•	84

15     Distribution of Pb versus Fe in mussels from the
       Black Rock Harbor exposure	 85

-------
                        LIST OF FIGURES (Cont'd)

No.                                                               Page

16     Distribution of Cd versus Fe in mussels from the
       Black Rock Harbor exposure	85

17     Distribution of Zn versus Fe in mussels from the
       Black Rock Harbor exposure	86

18     Distribution of Cu versus Fe in mussels from the
       Black Rock Harbor exposure	87

19     Distribution of As versus Fe in mussels from the
       Black Rock Harbor exposure	 88

20     Distribution of Mn versus Fe in mussels from the
       Black Rock Harbor exposure	88

-------
                              LIST OF TABLES

No.                                                                page

 1     Summary of Experimental CondiCions for the Contaminant
       Uptake Study with My til us edulis	 25

 2     Test Species, Exposure Conditions, and Food Used for Solid
       Phase Biological Assays for Sediment Characterization	 37

 3     Test Species, Exposure Conditions, and Food for Suspended
       Particulate Phase Assays for Sediment Characterization	44
                                                               .;•}
 4     Single Replicate PCB Concentrations as Aroclor®1254 in
       ng/g Dry Weight Including Chlorine Number Distributions
       by Mass Spectrometry	 64

 5     Parent Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Found in the
       Exposed Mussels and Black Rock Harbor Sediment	66

 6     Mean Concentrations + Standard Deviation of Parent PAH
       Compounds Found in Exposed and Control Mussels and in
       Black Rock Harbor Sediment in ng/g Dry Weight	68

 7     Mean Concentrations + Standard Deviation of the Sum of C-l
       Through C-4 Alkyl Homologs of PAH's Found in Exposed and
       Control Mussels and in Black Rock Harbor Sediment
       Quantitated as Each Parent PAH	 69

 8     Distribution of Five Silicone-like Compounds in Exposed
       and Control Mussels and Black Rock Harbor Sediment Measured
       as GC-MS Area Counts/Gram Dry Weight	 70

 9     Organic Contaminants in Black Rock Harbor Sediment,
       ng/g Dry Weight, One Replicate	 73

10     Distribution of Trace Elements in  g/g Dry Weight
       in Exposed and control Mussels	'.	78

11     Average Metal Concentrations in Black Rock Harbor
       Barrel #00 and Barrel //LL Sediment Samples	80

12     Ratios of Trace Metal Accumulations in Exposed
       and Control Mussels	 82

13     Toxicity of Solid Phase Black Rock Harbor (Connecticut)
       Dredged Material to 11 Species of Marine
       Invertebrates and Fishes	 91

-------
                        LIST OF TABLES (Cont'd)

No.                                                                Page

14     Percent of Yoldia not Burrowed into Sediment over Time  for
       Solid Phase Test No. 1 and Suspended Phase Test No.  1	  93

15     Summary of Response Percent Mortality of  Ampelisca abdita
       after 96-hr Exposure in Solid Phase Tests with
       Black Rock Harbor Sediment	96

16     Toxicity of Black Rock Harbor Dredged Material,
       as Suspended Sediment, to Ten Species of  Marine
       Invertebrates and Fishes	  100

-------
              CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF




                   BLACK ROCK HARBOR DREDGED MATERIAL








                         PART I:  INTRODUCTION






                               Background






        1.  The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (CE) and the U.S. Environ-




mental  Protection Agency (EPA) are jointly conducting a comprehensive




Field Verification Program (FVP) to evaluate the risk associated with




various disposal options for dredged material.  The approach being




used in the FVP is to evaluate and field validate assessment methodol-




ogies for predicting the environmental impacts of dredged material




disposal in aquatic, upland, and wetland environments.  The research,




evaluation, and field verification of the upland and wetland disposal




options is being conducted by the Environmental Laboratory, U.S. Army




Engineer Waterways Experiment Station (WES), Vicksburg, Miss.  The




application and field verification of predictive methodologies for the




aquatic disposal option is being conducted by the EPA Environmental




Research Laboratory (ERL-N), Narragansett, R.I.






                                 Purpose






        2.  The aquatic disposal alternative of the FVP is being used




as a site-specific case study to evaluate a hazard assessment research




strategy.  Hazard assessment in terms of this study is a process by




which data on exposure and effects are assembled and interpreted to




determine the potential for harm to the aquatic environment that could







                                   8

-------
result from the ocean disposal of a particular material.  To measure




this hazard, information on the duration and intensity of exposure




(exposure assessment) of organisms and the concentrations of contami-




nants in the materials disposed at the site (predicted environmental




concentration) is coupled with concentrations of the contaminants




determined to be toxic to individual species, populations, and commu-




nities in laboratory toxicity studies (effects assessment).  When




properly synthesized, these data provide an estimate of the probability




(risk) of unacceptably altering the aquatic environment as a result of




the disposal of the materials.  The verification of hazard assessment




is comprised of two components: verification of an individual method




or protocol between the lab and field, and verification of the predic-




tion of risk to the aquatic environment.  Within this context, hazard




assessment contains parallel predictive laboratory and field verifica-




tion components.  The achievement of the goal of hazard assessment




requires the development and verification of assessment protocols for




defining exposure and effects.







                                 Scope






       3.  The first research component in the aquatic portion of the FVP




is sediment characterization, which includes chemical and biological




characterization of the dredged material.






Chemical characterization




       4.  Chemical characterization is focused on determining what




chemical contaminants are present in the dredged material and, of

-------
these, which bioaccumulate and constitute a potential threat to man

and the ecosystem.  The approach taken in chemical characterization is

to allow the environment, 'in the form of an organism (Mytilus edulis),

to indicate contaminants of biological importance from the dredged mate-

rial.  These contaminant profiles can then be compared with chemical

profiles both from the bulk sediment analysis and a more detailed

sediment chemistry analysis of organic contaminants.  This approach

has several advantages over chemical screening for preselected compounds

(e.g., 129 priority pollutants):

           a_.  Chemical screening of preselected chemicals generally
               results in a large number of chemicals being classified
               as nondetectable.

           b.  Preselection reduces the number of contaminants examined.

Eliminating preselection and allowing an organism to bioaccumulate con-

taminants increases the probability of detection, reduces the risk of

a biologically important contaminant not being detected, and focuses

the research and monitoring efforts on those contaminants known to

bioaccumulate.  The one element of uncertainty in this approach is that

there may be contaminants which go undetected that are biologically

active but do not bioaccumulate.  The risk of this occurring, however,

is considered to be relatively negligible.


Biological characterization

       5.  Biological characterization focuses on "worst-case" toxicological

evaluation of dredged material.  As such, the exposure regimes do not

necessarily reflect actual field conditions.  The approach selected is to
                                   10

-------
adapt existing toxicological protocols for use with solid and suspended




participate phase flow-through tests for both indigenous and "surrogate"




test species.  Each acute toxicity test will be evaluated for its appli-




cability and sensitivity for detecting and measuring dredged material




effects.  Determinations of test and method variability and reproduci-




bility will be made where appropriate.  Finally, results from these




tests will be used to help design exposure conditions for future sub-




lethal biological effects tests.
                                    11

-------
                 PART  II:  GENERAL METHODS AND MATERIALS






        6.  The principal components of this study and their interrela-




 tionships  are schematically represented in Figure 1.  The methods for




 sediment characterization begin with the suspended sediment (SS) dosing




 system.  This system is designed to maintain reservoirs of reference




 sediment and dredged material under defined anoxic conditions and to




 quantitatively deliver them through recirculating loops to test systems.




        7.  In studies on chemical characterization, known quantities of




 suspended  dredged material were delivered to the contaminant uptake




 system containing the bivalve mollusc Mytilus edulis, where chemical




 analyses were conducted for contaminants within the tissues, dissolved




 in the water, and in the particulate phase from the sediment dosing




 system.  These analyses were compared with sediment chemical analyses




 to determine which of the many sediment contaminants were bio-




accumulated.




       8.  The suspended sediment dosing system also interfaced with a




 series of experimental components in the studies for biological charac-




 terization.  Sediment suspensions were first quantitatively delivered




 to a controlled dilution system.  Here, diluted sediment suspensions




were maintained using a transmissometer-microprocessor feedback system.




 These suspensions then flowed into multiported distribution systems




which fed a constant, prescribed dilution of suspension to the suspended




sediment toxicity test chambers.  Toxicological information was produced




 for polychaetous annelids, bivalve molluscs,  arthropods (crustaceans),




and fishes.
                                   12

-------
                     SUSPENDED SEDIMENT (SS)

                           DOSING SYSTEM
   CE
   Bulk Sediment
   Analysis
    CHEMICAL
'CHARACTERIZATION'
         I
   BIOLOGICAL
CHARACTERIZATION
                                                       SS-Controlled
                                                       Dilution System
     Dissolved
     Contaminants
                Particulate
                Contaminants
   SS-Distribution
   System
                                                       SS-Toxicity
                                                       Test System
     Figure 1.  Principal  components of sediment characterization


                   Sediment  Collection and Preservation


Reference sediment

       9.  Reference  sediment  (REF) for the FVP sediment characteriza-

tion studies was collected from the South Reference site (41°7.95"N

and 72°52.7"W), which is approximately 700 m south of the southern

perimeter of the Central Long  Island Sound (CLIS) disposal site  (Figure

2).  Reference  sediment was  collected with a Smith-Maclntyre grab

sampler (0,1 m^) in both August and December 1982.  Sediment collected

on each date was returned  to the laboratory, press seived (wet)  within

48 hr through a 2-mm  mesh  stainless steel screen, homogenized, and

stored at 48C until used for experimental purposes.  Sediment from the
                                    13

-------
August  collection was stored in 32 cm x 61 cm x 25 cm (38 L)  polypro-

pylene  containers.  Sediment in each container was allowed to reach

room  temperature and rehomogenized (mixed) prior to use.
                   BLACK ROCK
                     HARBORJ
                                                                  FVP
                                                                DISPOSAL
                                                                  SITE
                                                           SOUTH REFERENCE
                                                                • SITE
           Figure 2.   Central  Long  Island Sound disposal site
                       and South  reference site
Sediment from the December  collection was stored in 3.8-L glass jars

with polypropylene lids.  Each jar  of material was coded with a collec-

tion date, batch number,  bottle number, and the name of the person to

whom the material was  assigned.
                                   14

-------
Black Rock Harbor sediment




       10.  Black Rock Harbor is locatd in Bridgeport, Conn. (Figure 3),




with the approximate coordinates of 73°13"W and 41°9" N.  The study




reach begins 400 m south of the fork in Cedar Creek and extends seaward




for approximately 1700 m.  Black Rock Harbor (BRH) bottom sediments




were collected at 25 locations within the study area using a O.l-m^




gravity box corer to a depth of 1.21 m and placed in 210-L barrels and




transported in a refrigerated truck (at 4°C) to WES.  The contents of




the 25 barrels were emptied into a nitrogen-purged cement mixer and




homogenized.  The homogenized sediment was then redistributed to the




25 barrels and aliquots were taken from each for sediment chemical




analysis.  Thirteen barrels were then transported to ERL-N in a refrig-




erated truck and stored at 4°C.  The remaining 12 barrels were stored




at WES.  At ERL-N, the contents of each barrel were completely homog-




enized, wet sieved prior to use through a 1-mm mesh sieve to remove




large particles, and distributed to 3.8-L brown reagent bottles.




During the distribution process, the sediment was repetitively mixed.




To ensure that the contents in the bottles were consistent, 400-ml




samples were taken from before the 1st, 25th, and 50th bottle for




moisture content and chemical analysis.  Each bottle was coded with




barrel number, date, and the name of the person to whom the material




was assigned, and then stored at 4°C.
                                   15

-------
                                         MAINTENANCE
                                         DREDGING
               Figure 3.  Black Rock Harbor, Connecticut,
                       source of dredged material
                          Sediment Dosing System


       11.  Two identical sediment dosing systems were constructed to

simultaneously provide either BRH or REF as suspended sediment to several

toxicity tests (Figure 4).  The dosing systems consisted of conical-shaped

slurry reservoirs placed in a chilled fiberglass chamber, a diaphragm

pump, a 4-L separatory funnel, and several return loops that directed the

particulate slurry through dosing valves.  The slurry reservoirs (40 cm

diam by 55 cm high) contained 40 L of slurry comprised of 37.7 L of

filtered seawater and 2.3 L of either BRH or REF sediment.  The fiberglass

chamber (94 cm x 61 cm x 79 cm high) was maintained between 4° and 10°C
                                   16

-------
using an  externally chilled water  source.  (The slurry was chilled to




minimize  microbial degradation during the test.)  Polypropylene pipes




(3.8 cm diam) placed at  the bottom of the reservoir cones were




connected to Teflon® diaphragm pumps  (16 to 40 L/min capacity).




This type of pump was used to circulate the slurry but minimize




abrasion  so that the physical properties and particle sizes of the




material  remained as unchanged as  possible.  The separatory funnel was




connected  to the pump and returned to the reservoir by polypropylene




pipes.  The separatory funnel served two functions: (a) to ensure that




a constant head pressure was provided by the overflow, and (b) to




serve as  a connection for the manifold located 4 cm below the constant




head level.  The manifold served to distribute the slurry by directing




a portion of the flow from the funnel (through 6 mm inside diameter




polypropylene tubes) through the Teflon® dosing valves (Figures 4 and-




5) and back to the reservoir.  At  the dosing valves, the slurry was




mixed with seawater for the mussel contaminant uptake study and the




acute toxicity studies.  Argon gas was provided at the rate of 200




ml/min to  the reservoir and separatory funnel to minimize oxidation of




the sediment/seawater slurry.  Narragansett Bay seawater filtered (to




15y) through sand filters was used for the contaminant uptake and




toxicity  studies.  The dosing valves were controlled by a microprocessor




connected  to a transmissometer (Figure 5).  The microprocessor was




programmed to deliver a pulse with a duration of 0.1 sec up to continu-




ous pulse delivery and at intervals from once every second to once every




hour.  Under transmissometer control, the microprocessor responds by




modulating the pulse length to achieve the desired setpoint of suspended






                                   17

-------
sediment measured as turbidity (Sinnett and Davis 1983).  The trans-

missometer-microprocessor system was used to control the suspended

sediment concentrations in the mussel contaminant uptake study and

the acute toxicity studies.


               ARGON
              INJECTION
           SEPARATORY
             FUNNEL
                                       DELIVERY
                                       MANIFOLD
             I
                                                   DOSING
                                                   VALVE
                                              TO EXPOSURE
                                                SYSTEM
                                         RETURN
                                         MANIFOLD
                                           SLURRY
                                           RESERVOIR
              CHILLED
              WATER  BATH
         Figure 4.  Sediment dosing system with chilled water
                        and argon gas supply
                                 18

-------
 STRIP CHART
 RECORDER
         MICRO-
         PROCESSOR
                         CONTROL

                            BOX
                             I
               SLURRY
                                DOSING VALVE
RETURN TO
RESERVOIR
                                           SOLENOID
                     EXPOSURE SYSTEM
                                  \
        F±gure
               TRANSM1SSOMETER

Suspended sediment feedback control loop
 and strip chart recorder
                          19

-------
        PART  III:  CHEMICAL  CHARACTERIZATION METHODS AND MATERIALS









                         Contaminant Uptake Test






Mussel  collection




        12.   The blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) was used to determine the




bloavailability of certain  contaminants within BRH materials In a 28-day




test.   One month prior  to exposure, mussels were collected from a well




studied area in Narragansett Bay, R.I., that was relatively free of con-




taminants (Phelps et al. 1983; Phelps and Galloway 1980).  Test organisms,




50 to 70 mm shell length, were temperature acclimated from 5° to 15°C at




the rate of  1°C per day, then held in unfiltered, flowing seawater until




initiation of the experiment.






Exposure system




        13.  The system used to expose blue mussels to BRH material in




the 28-day flowing seawater test is shown in Figure 6.  The exposure




apparatus consisted of a fiberglass resin-coated plywood tank (123-L




capacity) partitioned into two compartments.  Filtered seawater entering




the mixing chamber at 2 L/min was vigorously combined with the BRH




material and the mussels' food, marine algae (a mixture of Phaeodactylum




tricornutum and T-Isochrysis galbana).  The mixture cascaded over a




partition into the exposure chamber containing the mussels and a trans-




mi ssometer which measured the amount of suspended particulates in the




water.  To ensure that the particles were rapidly and evenly dispersed




throughout the tank, water was collected through a manifold near the
                                   20

-------
transmissometer ana returned to the mixing chamber at a rate of 38

L/min.  Polypropylene or polyethylene plumbing materials were used

throughout.
                                      SEAWATER/SEDIMENT
                                           SLURRY
                                                ALGAE
       TO  MICROPROCESSOR
        TRANSMISSOMETER
                                                       MIXING
                                                       CHAMBER
       RECIRCULATING
       PUMP

   Figure 6.  Blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) contaminant uptake system
       14.  The sediment dosing system delivered BRH sediment  directly

into the mussel exposure chamber via the dosing valve which was con-

trolled by the microprocessor and transmissometer.   As the mussels

removed the suspended particles below the desired concentration,  the

microprocessor opened the dosing valve to deliver the BRH suspension

and simultaneously turned on a peristaltic pump to deliver algae to
                                   21

-------
 the  chamber.  Delivery volumes  by  the  valve  and peristaltic pump were




 adjusted to maintain a constant ratio  of sediment and algae during a




 microprocessor  pulse.  In  response to  a transmissometer signal every 5




 min,  the microprocessor modulated  the  pulse  length to achieve an exposure




 concentration in  the chamber  of 9.5 mg/L of  suspended particles, con-




 sisting of 9 mg/L sediment and  0.5 mg/L algae  (30 x 106 cells/L).  This




 concentration of  suspended sediments was estimated to be below the




 concentration that would stress or adversely affect the organisms.




A preliminary test demonstrated no appreciable mortality, histopatho-




 logical responses, or adverse changes  in scope for growth (SFG) after




 2 weeks of exposure to 20 mg/L.




       15.  The control for this experiment  was designed to verify that




contaminants observed in the mussels were accumulated from BRH material




rather than from  the seawater or the algal cultures.  The control expo-




sure was conducted in an identical test apparatus, except that no sedi-




ment  suspension was delivered to the chamber.  Instead, a suspended




particulate concentration of 0.5 mg/L consisting entirely of algae was




maintained by the microprocessor feedback system.






Experimental conditions




       16.  Test methods.  Whenever possible, the general bioconcentration




test methods used were from "Proposed Standard Practice for Conducting




Bioconcentration Tests with Fishes and Saltwater Bivalve Molluscs,"




 (American Society For Testing and Materials  (ASTM) 1980a).   Although not




specifically intended for suspended sediment testing,  the general recom-




mendations defining test  animal care, handling and acclimation procedures,
                                    22

-------
seawater quality, and acceptable exposure conditions were suitable for




this test.




       17.  Prior to placing animals in the test chambers, 20 mussels




were randomly selected from the mussel holding system for organic and




inorganic chemical analysis to determine the baseline residues in the




mussels before the exposures began.  At the start of the 28-day uptake




study, 300 mussels were placed in each of the BRH and control chambers.




During the test, 20 mussels from the BRH chamber were sampled for chem-




ical analysis on days 7, 14, and 28.  Twenty mussels from the control




chamber were sampled on day 28.




       18.  From each sample, eight mussels were frozen (-20°C) whole for




possible future use.  The remaining twelve mussels were separated into




three groups of four each, the soft tissues removed and homogenized.  A




2-g sample from each of the homogenates was used for inorganic analyses




and the remainder for organic analyses.




       19.  Suspended particulate concentrations.  Twice each week sus-




pended particulate concentrations from the control and exposure chambers




were analyzed by dry weight determination and by electronic particle




counting (ly to 40p particle range).  The dry weight determinations




were conducted according to Standard Methods  (American Public Health




Association (APHA) 1976) with the following modifications.  The filters




were washed with a 50-ml aliquot of delonized water before sample filtra-




tion, and followed by three 10-ml rinses of deionized water immediately




after sample filtration to remove salt.  Measurements of dissolved




oxygen salinity, temperature, and ammonia-nitrogen were made to docu-




ment water quality (Table 1).  All of the water quality measurements






                                    23

-------
were well within the guidelines established by ASTM.  Mortality




over the 28-day period was 13% for the exposed mussels and 6% for the




controls.  The dry weight of suspended particulates in the exposure




tank did not fluctuate from the nominal level of 9.5 mg/L by more than




15%.  Dry weight of suspended particulates in the control tank exceeded




the nominal level of 0.5 mg/L by an average of 1.2 mg/L; however, the




total number of particles (26 x 106 particles/L) within the size




range of the algal species used and of the size which mussels filter




efficiently was within 2% of the nominal level of 30 x 106 particles/L.




This discrepency appeared to be due to mussel fecal pellets suspended




in the water samples taken for dry weight measurements.  Maintenance




of the exposure system required routine cleaning of tanks and replace-




ment of BRH sediment in the sediment dosing system.  On these occasions,




the system had to be shut down and the concentration of suspended




particulates did not remain within ASTM guidelines; however, this




condition comprised only 1% of the 28-day exposure period.
                                   24

-------
                                  Table 1

       Summary of Experimental Conditions  for the  Contaminant  Uptake

                         Study with Mytilus edulis*
   Parameter
   Control
 Suspended  solids,
    dry  wt,  mg/L

 Particle density,
    No./L

 Temperature,  °C
Dissolved oxygen,
   mg/L

Salinity, ppt
Un-ionized ammonia,
 1.72 ±  0.18
(1.45 - 2.02)

  2.6 +  0.3 X 107
 (2.0 - 3.1 X 107)

 15.7 ±  0.4
(15.0 - 16.4)

  7.5 ±  0.6
 (7.0 - 8.5)

 28.4 ±  1.8
  (24 - 30)

  2.9 ±  1.29
(0.64 - 5.40)
   Exposure
 9.32 ± 0.58
(8.19 - 10.33)

   12 ± 1.3 X 107
 (9.6 - 13.7 X 107)

 15.6 ± 0.3
(15.4 - 16.4)

  7.6 ± 0.4
 (7.1 - 8.4)

 28.4 ± 1.8
  (24 - 30)

 3.83 ± 1.68
(1.04 - 6.40)
*  Tabular values are mean and standard deviation (N = 9) with the range
  denoted by parentheses.
                           Sample Preparation
Mussels
       20.  Organic.  The analytical procedures described below repre-

sent the state-of-the-art in marine organic analysis and have been

intercalibrated with several oceanographic laboratories.  EPA recog-

nized analytical methods, while available for these classes of contam-

inants, have been developed primarily for freshwater and wastewater

systems.  These methods required extensive modification and intercali-

bration when applied to marine systems for the types of matrices and

levels of detection required in this study.
                                   25

-------
       21.  Each of: the separate sample homogenates from above was




treated as a separate sample with appropriate blanks carried through




the entire procedure.  To each sample was added 15 ml of acetone and




the mixture homogenized for 20 sec and then centrifuged at 1750 rpm




for 5 rain.  The fluid layer was decanted into a 1-L separatory funnel




containing 150 ml of pre-extracted water.  The acetone extraction and




centritugation were repeated once more and the extracts combined in




the separatory funnel.  The extraction and centrifugation were repeated




twice more using 25 ml of Freon® 113 as the solvent.  Because of the




density of Freon®, the solvent was withdrawn from the bottom of the




centrifuge tubes using a syringe.  The Freon® extracts were combined




in the separatory funnel which was then shaken and the Freon® layer




drawn off.  The remaining aqueous layer was extracted twice more with




50 ml of Freon® each time.  The Freon® extracts were combined and the




aqueous layer discarded.




       22.  To remove interfering biogenic material and some residual




particulates, the combined Freon® extracts were passed through the first




column (2 x 25 cm of 100% activated 100 to 200 mesh silicic acid).  For




sediment samples 2.5 cm of activated copper powder was added to the top




of the first column to remove elemental sulfur.  The column was then




rinsed with 25 ml Freon® followed by 50 ml of methylene chloride.  The




eluate was collected and volume reduced in a round bottom flask fitted




with a Kuderna-Danish and 3-ball Snyder column.  The solvent was ex-




changed to hexane as the sample approached 5 ml.  Final volume reduction




to 5 ml was accomplished by placing the sample in a concentrator tube
                                   26

-------
 and  having  it  blown  down with  a gentle  stream of helium  (ultra-high




 purity).



        23.   The  5-ml sample extracts were then charged onto a 0.9 cm x




 45 cm second column  of 5% deactivated 100 to 200 mesh silica gel.




 Three fractions  were collected from the column.  Fraction 1 (PF-50)




 consisted of 50  ml of pentane; fraction 2 (F-2) consisted of 35 ml of



 20%  methylene  chloride in pentane; and  fraction 3 (F-3) consisted of




 35 ml of methylene chloride.   The PF-50 fraction was designed to col-




 lect the PCB's and related materials, while fraction F-2 was designed




 to collect aromatic  hydrocarbons.  The  F-3 fraction collected more




 polar material,  which will be  analyzed  in detail at a later date.




 Each column fraction was reduced in volume by Kuderna-Danish evapora-




 tion as above, with  the solvent changed to hexane.  The final sample




volume- of 1 ml was achieved by adding 1 ml of heptane to the sample in




a 10-ml concentrator tube.  Glass ebullators and microsnyder columns




were added and the samples reduced on a tube heater at 110°C to 1 ml.




The  extracts were then divided in half  between sealed glass ampules




for archival storage and screw cap vials for gas chromatographic and




mass spectrometric analysis.




       24.  All  glassware used for the  collection, storage, extraction,




and analysis of  samples was washed with Alconox®, rinsed 4 times with




hot  tap water, 4 times with deionized water, capped with aluminum foil,




and muffled for  6 hours at 450°C.   Immediately prior to use glassware



was  rinsed 3 times with an appropriate  solvent.
                                   27

-------
       25.  Stainless steel centrifuge bottles were washed as glassware




and then rinsed twice with methanol, twice with methylene chloride, and




twice with hexane immediately prior to use.




       26.  Polytrons® used for homogenization and extraction samples




were washed as glassware and then placed in an ultrasonic bath in




graduated cylinders filled first with methanol, methylene chloride, and




then with hexane prior to use.




       27.  Glass fiber filters were placed individually in aluminum




foil and muffled for 6 hours at 450°C.  The stainless steel filter




housing was washed and rinsed with acetone and hexane prior to use.




       28.  Inorganic.  From each sample homogenate, described in para-




graphs 20-27, about 2 g of wet tissue was taken for inorganic analysis,




placed in a tared beaker, and weighed.  The samples were oven dried at




110°C for 2 days, cooled in a desiccator, and weighed.  Ten milliliters




of reagent grade nitric acid was added to each sample, which was then




allowed to digest at room temperature in a hood for 24 hours.  The




samples were heated at 60°C for several days until complete dissolution




of the sample had occurred.  The samples were then evaporated to near




dryness at 90-95°C, and cooled to room temperature.  Three milliliters




of 30% hydrogen peroxide was slowly added in 1-ml increments to reduce




the intensity of the effervescent reaction.  The solutions were then




heated to 60°C for 24 hours, evaporated to near dryness, and cooled to




room temperature.  At this point the clear and colorless solutions




were transferred to 25-ml volumetric flasks with several rinses of 5%




nitric acid, and were diluted to the mark with 5% nitric acid.  The




solutions were then transferred to screw cap polyethylene bottles.






                                   28

-------
Fifty-milliliter quantities of  trace metal stripped seawater (Davey




et al.  1979) were  treated like  mussel samples in order to estimate the




metal blank values for  the Polytron® homogenization procedure for the




mussel  samples.  All procedures used to prepare the glass centrifuge




tubes and Polytron® were identical to that used for mussel samples.




The seawater remained in contact with the operating Polytron® for the




same period of time required for homogenization of the mussel samples.




Three 10-ml quantities  from each centrifuge tube were then pipetted




into beakers and processed like the 2-g (wet weight) homogenized mussel




tissue.






Sediments




        29.  Organic.  The methods which follow were used for the extrac-




tion and analysis  of BRU sediment.  Approximately 10 g of wet sediment



was placed in a stainless steel centrifuge tube, and 50 ml of acetone




was added.  The mixture was homogenized for 40 seconds using a brass-




bearing equipped Polytron®, and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5




minutes.  The acetone was decanted in a 1-L separatory funnel containing




150 ml of pre-extracted deionized water.  The extraction and centrifu-




gation steps were repeated once more and all extracts were combined in




the separatory funnel.  The aqueous layer in the separatory funnel was




extracted three times with 50 ml of Freon® 113 each time and the extracts




were combined in a  500-ml Erlenmeyer flask.  Extracts were frozen to




remove water.



       30.  The sediment Freon® extracts were subjected to the same two




column chromatographic separations as were the tissue sample extracts,
                                   29

-------
except tor the addition of a 2.3-cra activated copper powder layer to




the first column for the removal of elemental sulfur.  The copper




powder was activated by washing it with feN KCl, followed by a deionized




water rinse and then a raethanol and raethylene chloride rinse.  The




first column removed biogenic material and the second column separated




the sample into the non-polar PF-50 fraction which contained PCB's and




other similar materials; an F-2 fraction, which contained primarily




aromatic hydrocarbons; and an F-3 fraction, which contained more polar




material and will be analyzed later.  The samples were reduced in volume




and split for analysis and archival storage as described above.  Similar




analytical methods have been reported by Lake et al. (1979).




       31.  Inorganic.  After thoroughly homogenizing the sediment




contained in a barrel (see homogenization of sediment) nine samples




were taken for analysis from each barrel.  These nine samples included




three from the top, three from the middle, and three from the bottom.




The wet weight of each sample was determined.  Samples from barrel #00




were ladled into 400-ml Pyrex beakers and samples from barrel #LL were




ladled into 250-ml acid-cleaned polyethylene bottles.  The wet weight




of all samples was then determined.  The samples were frozen and then




freeze dried in a Virtis® lypholyzer (model #10-145MR-BA) for 2 days.




The dry weight of each sample was then determined.




       32.  Samples from barrel #00 were acidified with a total of 50 ml




of concentrated HN03 (reagent grade).  The acid was added in 10-ml




aliquots since BRh sediment is very reactive to acid.  All reaction was




allowed to subside before the next addition of acid was made.   After




several days the samples were heated at 60°C.  The sediment samples







                                   30

-------
were  subsequently  evaporated down  to approximately  10 ml after which




30% H202 was added in  2-ml aliquots until 50 ml had been added.  The




H202  was added  cautiously since BRH sediment reacts vigorously with




strong oxidizing agents.  The  samples were evaporated down to approxi-




mately 25 ml and filtered through  acid-rinsed (5% HN03> Whatman® 41




filter paper into 250-ml volumetric flasks.  The beakers were rinsed




with  25-ml quantities  of 5% HM^.  The rinse solution was also filtered




through the filter paper and added to the volumetric flask.  The volumet-




ric flasks were brought up to volume with 5% HN(>3.  The solutions




were  then transferred  to polyethylene bottles fitted with polyethylene




screw caps.  Two empty beakers were taken through the entire concen-




trated acid dissolution procedure  to estimate applicable metal blanks.




       33.  Dilute NH03 (5%) was added to the 250-ml bottles containing




sediment from barrel #LL and allowed to stand at room temperature for




1 week.  The caps were loosely placed on top of each bottle during the




first few hours since  gas (probably H2S) is liberated during this




elution process.  The bottles were shaken vigorously once each day.




After 1 week the samples were filtered through acid-rinsed Whatman® 41




filter paper into acid-cleaned polyethlene bottles.   No H202 was added




to these samples.  Two empty bottles were taken through the entire




dilute acid dissolution procedure  to estimate applicable metal blanks.




The two dissolution techniques were used to determine if different



metal concentrations would be obtained for BRH sediment samples.
                                   31

-------
                             Sample Analysis






 Organic




       34.   Electron  capture gas  chromatographic analyses were




 conducted on a Hewlett-Packard model 5840 gas chromatograph equipped




 with a 30-m  DB-5 fused silica capillary column from J&W.  The chromatograph




 was temperature programmed from 80°C to 290°C at 10°C/min with a 4-min




 hold at 80°C.  Flame  ionization gas chromatographic analyses were




 conducted on a Carlo  Erba Fractovap gas chromatograph also equipped




 with a 30-m  DB-5 fused silica capillary column from J&W.  The temperature




 was programmed from 60°C to  325°C at 10°C/min with a 4-min hold.




       35.   Gas chromatograph/mass spectrometric (GC/MS) analysis was




 conducted on a Finnigan model 4500 equipped with a J&W DB-5 30-m fused




 silica capillary column.  The capillary column was connected directly




 to the mass  spectrometer with no interface present so that the effluent




 from the column passed directly into the ionization source of the mass




 spectrometer.  The mass spectrometer was operated through a standard




 Incos data system and was tuned to meet EPA quality assurance specifi-




 cations using decafluorotriphenylphosphine.  The ionizing current was




 typically set at 300 uA and  70 V, and the instrument operated such




 that 100 pg of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons from naphthalene to




 benzopyrene gave easily quantifiable signals on their molecular ions




with signal-to-noise ratios of 50:1 or better.  The mass spectrometer's




 gas chromatograph was programmed from 50°C to 330°C typically at




 10°C/min with a 2-min hold at 50°C, but was occasionally programmed at



 4°C/min for higher chromatographic resolution.
                                   32

-------
        36.  All  instruments were  calibrated with  authentic  standards




each day quantitation was attempted.  The concentrations of the stand-




ards used were chosen to be close to  the levels of  the materials of




interest, and periodic linearity  checks were made to ensure the proper




performance of each  system.  In some  cases, authentic standards were




not available, such  as for the alkyl  homologs of  the aromatic hydrocar-




bons.   In this case, the numbers  reported are a low estimate of the




actual  amount present, because the response factors for these homologs




were assumed to  be equal to those of  the corresponding PAH's, and the




alkylated homologs all have a decreased molecular ion intensity compared




to the  corresponding PAH's.




        37.  We also  did not have  standards for biphenyl, acenaphthene,




fluorene, and the aromatics with  molecular weights greater than 252.




Since the molecular weights of biphenyl (154), acenaphthene (154), and




fluorene (166) lie between those  of naphthalene (128) and anthracene




and phenanthrene (MW's 178), the  response factors of these three com-




pounds were estimated by averaging the response factor of naphthalene




with the average of  the response  factors of phenanthrene and anthracene.




Response factors for the aromatics heavier than the 252's were taken to




be the  same as that  for the 252's.






Inorganic



        38.  All flame atomization (FA) atomic absorption (AA) analysis




was done with a Perkin-Elmer atomic absorption instrument (Model 603).




All Hg determinations were done by the method of Hatch and Ott (1968)



using a Perkin-Elmer mercury/hydride system (Model MHS-1) adapted to






                                   33

-------
the 603 AA.  The transient Kg signals were recorded with a Perkin-Elmer



strip chart recorder (Model 56).  All heated graphite atomization



(HGA) atomic absorption determinations were conducted with a Perkin-



Elmer HGA unit (Model 500) coupled to a Perkin-Elmer atomic absorption



instrument (Model 5000) retrofitted with a Zeeman HGA background correc-



tion unit.  The Model 500 HGA unit was equipped with an auto injector



(Model AS-40).  The transient HGA-AA signals were recorded with a



Perkin-Elmer strip chart recorder (Model 56) and also sent automatically



to a Perkin-Elmer data station microcomputer (Model 3600).  Software



supplied with the data station reduced the transient signals to a peak



height and peak area for each element determined.  The instrument



set-up procedures for the FA-AA, MHS-1, and HGA-AA determinations



were in accordance with procedures described in "Methods For Chemical



Analysis of Water and Wastes" (EPA 1979) and are also found in the



manufacturer's reference manuals.



       39.  The AA instruments were calibrated each time samples were



analyzed for a given element.   Instrument calibrations were generally



checked after every five samples had been atomized into the flame unit,



injected into the HGA unit, or pipetted into the MHS-1 sample reaction



flask.  All samples were analyzed at least twice to determine signal



reproducibility; most were analyzed three times.  Generally one sample



was determined by the method of standard addition, and one procedural
                          >


blank sample was analyzed for each 15 samples processed.



       40.  All elements (i.e., Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu, Pb, Cd, Cr, and Ni)



except Hg and As were determined in the sediment samples by FA-AA.



Mercury was determined only in the BRH barrel #00 samples by the






                                   34

-------
MHS-l-AA technique.  Arsenic could not be determined in the sediment




samples because of a chemical interference.  At this time the cause of




the chemical interference is under investigation.




       41.  Due to the limited sample size of the mussel samples (i.e.,




2 g wet weight), only Fe and Zn could be determined by conventional




FA-AA.  All other elements (i.e., Mn, Cu, Pb, Cd, Cr, and As) were




determined by HGA-AA.  All mussel samples determined by HGA-AA were




matrix matched before analysis.  A matrix solution containing 10%




seawater and 90% 0.16 N nitric acid (V/V) was used as a diluent for




both standards and samples.  Samples were diluted with this matrix




modification solution so that the sample extracts never exceeded 20%




of the total volume of the solution analyzed.  Standards were made up




in an identical manner to the samples.
                                   35

-------
      PART IV:  BIOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION METHODS AND MATERIALS



                                 Overview


Methods

       42.  The 4-day (96-hr) and 10-day flow-through toxicity tests

described below generally followed the methods prescribed by "Standard

Practice for Conducting Acute Toxicity Tests with Fishes, Macroinverte-

brates, and Amphibians" (ASTM 1980b).  Although these acute toxicity

test methods were not specifically designed for suspended sediment or

solid phase sediment tests, they provided recommendations for test

animal care, handling, and acclimation, as well as guidelines for

experimental designs, water quality parameters, statistical analyses,

and general quality criteria that were suitable for the sediment tests.

Holding and acclimation conditions for each species were similar or

identical to the test conditions (Table 2).

       43.  Toxicity tests.  For each species, two types of flow-through

toxicity tests were conducted:

           £.  Solid phase, in which BRH sediment or REF sediment was
               placed in the bottom of the exposure chambers and fil-
               tered seawater allowed to flow over the sediment

           b_.  Suspended particulate phase, in which suspensions of the
               sediments (25 rag/L) were dosed in combination with a
               solid phase sediment (either REF or a no-effect percent-
               age of BRH as determined by the solid phase tests).

The solid phase tests represent conditions similar to that on the dis-

posal mound in an undisturbed (quiescent) state;  the tests combining

solid phase and suspended sediments represent the conditions on the

disposal mound in a dynamic state.


                                   36

-------
                                                        Table  2
                          Test  Species,  Exposure  Conditions,  and  Food Used for Solid Phase

Species
Annelids
Neanthes
ar cnaceode n t ata
Nephtys incisa
Molluscs
Yoldia
llmatula
Mulinla
lateralis
Arthropods
Mysidopsia
bahia
Anpelisca abdita
Fishes
Menidia
menidia
Cyprinodon
variegatua
Ammodytes
americanus embryo
larvae
Paralichthys
dentatus
Pseudopleuronectes
americanus


N*
3
3
2
2
3
6
2
2
2
6
2
2
Biological

Exposure Time
days
10
10
10
10
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
Assays for

Salinity
ppt
30
(30-32)**
31
(30-32)
28
(27-30)
29
(18-30)
29
(26-30)
30
30
(30-30)
29
(28-30)
30
(30-30)
29
(26-32)
28
(26-30)
29
(26-32)
Sediment Characterization

Temperature
°C
19
(19.8-20.1)
20
(19-21)
19
(18-21)
19.5
(18-21)
25
(23-26)
20
(19-21.5)
20.5
(20-20.8)
21.2
(20.2-21.9)
10
(9-11.5)
10.5
(8.2-11.2)
20
(19.5-20.8)
10
(9-11)

Se water Flow
Kate, ml/min
51
52
50
45 to 80
35
45 to 80
45
45 to 50
34
21 to 34
43 to 49
35 to 40

Photoperiod
hrs
14
14
14
14
12
14
12
12
12
12
12
12

Food
none
none
none
none
Artemia
nauplii
none
Artemia
nauplii
none
none
Brachionus
glleatlllB
Artemia
nauplii
Artemia
nauplii
 * N - number of tests conducted.
** Parentheses denote ranges.

-------
        44.   In  the  solid  phase  tests, a measured quantity of BRH, REF,




or a mixture of the two sediments was placed in an exposure chamber




and filtered seawater allowed to flow over  the material.  Introduction




of the  test animals into  the exposure chambers was delayed 2 to 24 hr




after starting  the  seawater flow to allow settling of any suspended




material.  After the animals were placed in the chambers, the sediments




were left undisturbed until the end of the  test.  Test species, exposure,




conditions, and food used in the solid phase tests are listed in Table 2.




        45.  All tests (solid and suspended  sediment phase) were conducted




with sand-filtered Narragansett Bay seawater at approximately 30 ppt




salinity.  The photoperiod simulated a natural cycle for the time of




year these tests were conducted (Tables Bl to B52).  Test temperatures




were generally held at 20°C; however, two species (Ammodytes and




Pseudopleuronectes) required 10°C.




        46.  The performance of suspended particulate phase tests required




the interfacing of three experimental modules:  the suspended sediment




(SS) controlled dosing system, the SS dilution system, and the SS




toxicity test system.  The suspended sediment dosing system (Figure 4)




supplied REF and BRH sediments at a concentration of 5.75 percent




(2.3 L of sediment in 37.7 L of seawater) to the suspended sediment




dilution system (Figure 7).  This system consists of individual (REF




and BRH) 72-L glass aquaria containing a transmissometer to measure




turbidity and a recirculating submersible pump and manifold to maintain




a uniform particle distribution.  Temperature-controlled filtered




seawater was introduced into the aquaria on demand.  A suspended sedi-




ment concentration (BRH and REF) of 25 mg/L was maintained for all







                                   38

-------
acute  tests  by  the microprocessor-transmissometer feedback loop  (Figure

5) that controlled the  pulse duration of the dosing valves of the sus-

pended sediment dosing  systems (Figure 4).  From the aquaria, uniform

25-mg/L suspensions of  sediment (REF and BRH) under constant head pressure.

flowed by gravity through polypropylene tubing to distribution chambers

(Figure 7).  The distribution chambers, 3.8-L glass jars, had nine ports

to distribute the 25-mg/L suspensions to eight separate exposure chambers.

The ninth port,  an overflow, functioned to maintain a constant head pres-

sure.  A seawater distribution chamber containing temperature-controlled,

filtered seawater without sediment was provided as an additional control

for all experiments.
                            SLURRY
                                          SEAWATER
        RETURN TO
        RESERVOIR
            DILUTION
            SYSTEM
                                            TO MICRO-
                                            PROCESSOR


                                            TRANSMISSOMETER
              DISTRIBUTION
              CHAMBER
                                x\      n~~\
                                TO EXPOSURE SYSTEMS
                                 OVERFLOW
                                 TO DRAIN
EXPOSURE
CHAMBERS
                                                    TO DRAIN
                                                      SEDIMENT
Figure 7.  Suspended sediment  dilution system,  distribution chamber, and
              exposure chambers used  for  acute  toxicity tests
                                     39

-------
       47.  Statistics.  Toxicity  test data were analyzed by probit anal-




ysis  (Finney 1971) if a dose-response relationship could be defined in




the tests.  In cases where only  two treatments were tested, a Chi-square




test was used to determine whether significant differences (P<0.05) in




mortality or a sublethal effect were observed.








                                 Annelids






Collection, culture, and holding




       48.  Two species of polychaete annelids, Nephtys incisa and




Neanthes arenaceodentata Moore (Nereis acuminata Ehlers), were used




for the acute tests.  Nephtys incisa were collected with a Smith-




Mclntyre dredge from the South reference site (Figure 2) in August and




October 1982 and February 1983.  The worms were sieved (0.5 mm) from




the sediment on board ship, sorted into size classes, placed into




sediment from that station, and transported back to ERL-N.  Worms were




held in the sediment with filtered Narragansett Bay water flowing over




them.  If temperature acclimation was needed, the seawater temperature




was raised about 2°C/day until the test temperature was reached and




then held for at least 10 days at that temperature prior,to testing.




       49.  Nephtys incisa were fed prawn flakes (ADT-Prime®, Aquatic




Diet Technology, Inc., Brooklyn, N.Y.) directly on the sediment surface




during holding.  At the start of the test, worms were sieved (0.335-mm




mesh seive) out of the sediment and placed in the test chambers.  All




tests with N.  incisa were conducted with juveniles.  Neanthes




arenaceodentata were from laboratory cultures (original stock from
                                   40

-------
D. J. Reish, California State University, Long Beach, Calif.).  Worms




were cultured at 20 +  1°C and fed prawn flakes.  Either adults or juve-




niles were used for toxicity tests.






Solid phase tests




       50.  The solid  phase tests were conducted in glass crystallizing




dishes (150 x 75 mm).  Each dish contained a 100-ml glass beaker (48 x




67 mm) in the center of the dish.  The inflow water (sand-filtered




Narragansett Bay seawater) was directed into this beaker (which con-




tained no sediment), flowed out of the beaker over the sediment surface,




and overflowed the edge of the crystallizing dish.  Flow rates were




approximately 50 ml/min.  Each dish contained 400 ml of sediment (2.5




to 3.5 cm deep).  Neanthes arenaceodentata were also exposed in indi-




vidual chambers constructed from glass Petri dishes (50 mm diameter)




with a nylon mesh collar (8 cm high) glued into the Petri dish.  The




chambers were placed in a glass box that received a constant inflow of




seawater and had a siphon at the outflow to create a fluctuating water




level in the box (Pesch and Morgan 1978).  The sediment layer in the




individual chambers was 1 cm deep.




       51.  The exposure concentrations used in the solid phase tests




were: 100, 75, 50, 25, and 0 percent BRH (100 percent REF).   The mix-




tures of the two sediments were made volumetrically, mixed thoroughly,




and then distributed to the exposure chambers.   An aliquot  of sediment




was taken, weighed, and dried a minimum of 24 hr, and reweighed to




establish the wet-dry ratio for each exposure concentration.  The




sediment was placed in the empty crystallizing dishes and the seawater
                                   41

-------
turned on.  After a minimum of 2 hr, the inflow water was turned off,




some water poured off so that the water level was below the edge of the




dish and the worms were added.  Approximately 1 hr later, each dish was




checked to be certain all the worms had burrowed into the sediment,




then the inflow water was turned back on.  Worms were not fed during




the test.  Three tests were conducted with jfl. incisa, two with similar




size worms from two different collections, and one with larger worms




(Tables Bl to B3).  Three tests were conducted with IJ. arenaceodentata,




two tests with adult males in the two different exposure chambers and




one test with juveniles.






Suspended particulate phase test




       52.  The suspended particulate tests were conducted in test cham-




bers similar to those used in the solid phase tests.  Each crystallizing




dish (150 x 75 mm) contained 400 ml sediment (2.5 to 3.5 cm deep).  A




smaller glass crystallizing dish (60 x 35 mm) was placed in the center




of the larger dish.  The inflow water (water with suspended particulate




matter) was directed into the smaller crystallizing dish, which con-




tained no sediment.  A Teflon®-coated stir bar kept the particulate




matter in suspension as it overflowed into the larger crystallizing




dish.  Neanthes arenaceodentata were exposed only in the crystallizing




dishes (not individual chambers) because the results of previous




solid phase tests indicated that the crystallizing dishes were suitable




containers for this species.




       53.  Exposure conditions for the solid phase portion of the sus-




pended particulate tests were 100 percent REF or 100 percent BRH.
                                   42

-------
 These  two  solid  phase  exposure  conditions  in  combination with  the  two




 suspended  sediment exposures  (25 mg/L REF  or  BRH) gave a total of  four




 exposure treatments.   The  test  was  conducted  four times with N. incisa




 juveniles  and  twice with N^. arenaceodentata juveniles.  The procedure




 for  adding the sediment and worms was the  same as in  the solid phase




 test except  for  the first  two tests with IN. incisa where the inflowing




 seawater was not turned off when the worms were placed in  the dishes




 (see Results section).  Worms were not fed during these tests  (Table 3),




       54.   During the tests, all exposure chambers were examined  daily




 for the appearence of any worms on the surface of the sediment.  On the




 last day of  the  test (day  10), measurements were made on the burrows




 visible through  the side of the dishes.  The  depth of the deepest  bur-




 row and estimated average depth of  the burrows were noted.  Then the




 sediment was sieved (0.335-mm seive mesh)  and the worms retrieved  and




 counted.   Any missing worms were presumed  dead from toxic effects.




 Since a weight gain in 10-day treatments was not expected, dry weights




 were taken merely to establish  the size of the worms used in the test.








                                  Molluscs






 Collection,  culture, and holding




       55.   Yoldia limatula and Mulinia lateralis, the two species of




molluscs used in the acute toxicity tests, were seived out of sediments




 from the South reference site on board ship in October 1982 and January




and February 1983 (Tables B10-B13).  The organisms were then returned




 to the laboratory where they were sorted from shell material and placed
                                   43

-------
                                                        Table 3
                         Test Species,  Exposure Conditions,  and Food for Suspended Particulate
Phase Assays for Sediment Characterization

Exposure Time
Species N* days
Annelids
Neanthes 1 10
arenaceodentata
Nephtys 2 10
incisa
Molluscs
Yoldia 1 10
limatula
Mulinia 2 10
later all s
Arthropods
Mysldopsis 2 4
bahla
Ampelisca 2 4
abdlta
Fishes
Menidia 2 4
menldia
Cyprinodon 2 4
variegatus
Aamodytes 2 4
americanus
Pseudopleuronectes 2 4
americanus


Salinity
ppt
27
(25-30)**
28
(25-30)
27.5
(25-30)
27.5
(25-30)
30
(28-31)
28
(27-29) (20.
30
(30-30)
27
(25-29)
29
(28-30)
28
(26-29)

Temperature Seawater Flow
°C Rate, ml/min
20
(19.8-20.5) 99
20
(19.2-20.5) 98
20.5
(20-21) 50
20.5
(19.8-21) 50
21
(20-21) 90
21 or 8
5-21.5)(7.5-8.5) 60
20
(19.6-20.3) 80 to 90
19.5
(19.3-20.1) 80 to 90
10
(8.2-11.6) 86 to 92
10.2
(8.2-12.7) 80 to 95


Photoperiod
hrs Food
12
12
14
14
12
14
12
12
12
12
none
none
none
none
Artemia
nauplii
none
Artemia
nauplii
none
Brachionus
plicatili
Artemia
nauplii
 *  N - number of tests conducted.
**  Parentheses denote ranges.

-------
in containers of REF sediment.  The newly collected organisms were




acclimated to 20°C at the rate of l°C/day.  Mulinia lateralis were fed




the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum daily; Tf. limatula were fed the




REF sediment.






Solid phase tests




       56.  Solid phase toxicity tests were conducted with Yoldia and




Mulinia for 10 days at approximately 20°C and 30 ppt.  The exposure




system consisted of three 70- by 50-mm glass crystallizing dishes




containing test sediment (65 mm deep) placed on a glass rack 3 cm




off the bottom of a 3.8-L glass jar with a siphon to drain.  Filtered




seawater entered the exposure system at a flow rate of 45 to 80 ml/min,




depending on the test species, and was circulated within the system by




a Teflon®-coated stir bar operated by a water-driven stirrer.  Each




exposure system was placed in a 20°C water bath of recirculating




seawater and monitored with a continuous temperature recorder.  Organ-




isms were added 6 to 24 hr after the sediments were distributed to the




exposure chambers.  Experimental concentrations were 100% BRH and 100%




REF for Mulinea, and 100, 66, 50, 33, 25, and 0 percent BRH for Yoldia.




The water content was determined for all sediment combinations.  Each




treatment consisted of two replicates.  A minimum of two replications




of each test were conducted to satisfy statistical design criteria.






Suspended particulate phase tests




       57.  For the suspended particulate exposures, 25-mg/L BRH and REF




slurries (previously mixed in the suspended sediment dilution aquaria,
                                   45

-------
Figure 7) were each delivered to a crystalizing dish  (17 cm x  9 cm)

fitted with a standpipe to maintain a constant water  level (Figure 8).

Material was kept in suspension with a water-driven stirrer and stir

bar.  To adjust flow rates to each exposure container,  U-shaped glass

siphons were set at the desired height.  The  suspension was collected

by small glass funnels that drained through polypropylene tubing to

the exposure chambers.  Flow rates were measured daily  (Table  3).

                               SLURRY
                  SIPHON
                                      STANDPIPE


DISTRIBU
CHAMB


I
T
EF

ON
?
1

1


                                               TO DRAIN
           EXPOSURE
           CHAMBER
                                                   TO EXPOSURE
                                                     CHAMBER
                                                 SEDIMENT

                                                 SUPPORT RACK
                                              MAGNETIC
                                              STIRRER
 Figure 8.  Distribution and exposure chambers used  for  solid  phase  and
        suspended particulate  phase  exposure  of Yoldia limatula,
                Mulinia lateralis, and Ampelisca  abdita

-------
       58.  Sediment  suspensions were monitored at least  twice during




each test using the dry weight measurement as described in the contam-




inant uptake test.








                                 Arthropods






       59.  An estuarine mysid, Mysidopsis bahia, and a benthic amphipod,




Ampelisca abdita, were the two species of arthropods used in both the




solid phase and the suspended particulate phase toxicity tests (Tables




B16-B28).






Collection, culture, and jiolding




       60.  Mysidopsis bahia were cultured in the laboratory for several




generations according to methods described in Gentile et al. (1982)




under conditions identical to those used in the toxicity tests.  Cul-




tures were maintained in filtered (15  ) Narragansett Bay seawater at




28+2 ppt salinity and 25° + 2°C temperature with a photoperiod of 14




hr light.  Cultures were fed daily ad libitum 24-hr posthatch Artemia




salina from the reference strain (Sorgeloos 1980).  Reference brine




shrimp were used because they were high in nutritional value, had a




high hatching percentage, and were low in contaminants.




       61.  Ampelisca abdita were collected from Long Island Sound or




Narrow River, Rhode Island, and transported unsieved to the laboratory




in native sediment.  The sediments were then sieved and the recovered




animals placed in presieved native or reference sediment for acclimation.




These animals were acclimated to the test temperature (20°C) at the rate




of l°C/day.  During acclimation, Ampelisca were fed daily ad libitum






                                   47

-------
with the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum.  Animal collection dates and




location are listed in Appendix Tables B21-B28.






Solid phase tests




       62.  Three flow-through acute toxicity tests were completed with




M. bahia.  Continuous-flow bioassays were conducted with a diluter




system modified from Mount and Brungs (1967) and an exposure system




from Sosnowski, Germond, and Gentile (1979)*  The exposure system




employed a siphon-flush mechanism that produced ten turnovers (volume




additions) per day (Table 2).  Sioassays were maintained at a tempera-




ture of 25° + 2°C and salinity of 28+2 ppt and illumination of 1000




lux on a 14-hr light cycle.  Sediment from BRH and REF (at room temper-




ature) was stirred and shaken vigorously before mixing to obtain the




desired percentage for each treatment.  The sediment was added to the




exposure cups to a depth of 2 cm and allowed to remain in the system




overnight in flowing seawater before animals were introduced.  Treat-




ments for all assays were:  100, 75, 50, and 25 percent BRH with a REF




control and a seawater control (no sediment).




       63.  The first test employed two exposure cups per replicate, for




a total of 20 animals per treatment (Table B16).  Dissolved oxygen and




salinity were not monitored during this test.  Cups for this test were




glass Petri dishes (100 mm diameter) with a 250-p nylon screen forming




the sides.  The cups were removed daily for monitoring.  Test organisms




could be seen most easily over the sediment by shining an intense beam




of light horizontally from the side of the test cup at the sediment/




water interface.
                                   48

-------
       64.  For the second and third tests, five 24- to 30-hr postrelease




juveniles were randomly distributed into each of three exposure cups per




two replicates for a total of 30 organisms per exposure concentration.




Each cup was fed 24-hr posthatch reference Artemia salina daily and




removed after 96 hr exposure to determine mortality.  Dissolved oxygen




was measured by Winkler titration on days 1 and 4 of these tests.  Cups




in these tests were glass jars (70 mm in diameter x 83 mm high) with a




32-mm-diam hole on either side covered with 250-p nylon screen, and




were removed for monitoring only at the end of the test (96 hr).




       65.  In the solid phase toxicity tests with Ampelisca abdita




acclimated organisms were sieved from their holding sediments, outsized




and dead organisms discarded, and the remainder sequentially distributed




into 100-ml plastic beakers of 20 organisms each.  At least 40 organisms




were preserved for size determination and the remaining beakers of organ-




isms were transferred to experimental chambers and checked after 1 hr




in order to replace any organisms that had not burrowed.  Two exposure




chambers (40 organisms) per treatment were placed in the exposure system.




       66.  The amphipod exposure system was similar to that used for the




bivalve molluscs,  except that each 3.8-L jar contained two exposure cham-




bers that consisted of 0.24-L glass jars, with four 2.5-cm-diam holes




covered with 0.4-mm mesh nylon screening.  These small jars were fitted




with polypropylene lids and self-starting siphons.  The water flowed




through the screens,  into the exposure chambers, and out through the




siphons to the drains (Figure 8).




       67.  Exposure chambers were checked daily and the number of indi-




viduals dead,  moribund, on the sediment, and on the water surface were






                                   49

-------
recorded.  The number of molts and condition of the tubes constructed




were also monitored.  At the conclusion of each assay, the sediment in




all containers was sieved and the animals counted.  Any animals missing




were assumed to be dead.  LCSO's were based on records of dead animals




only.






Suspended particulate phase tests




       68.  Suspended sediment toxicity tests with Mysidopsis bahia were




conducted using the same test apparatus as that used for the annelid




studies (Figure 7).  Test organisms used for the studies were cultured,




held, and acclimated using the same procedures as those used in the




solid phase tests.  Two distribution chambers (one for BRH and one for




REF, Figure 7) delivered mixtures of filtered seawater and sediment




slurry at a final particulate load of 25 mg/L.  A third distribution




chamber delivered only filtered seawater to the control treatment.




Test chambers consisted of 2-L glass culture dishes that held three




exposure cups (glass jars with netted holes as in the solid phase




tests).  The exposure cups were held above the bottom of the test




chamber by a glass grid to allow a stir bar to mix the particulate




suspension.  A siphon in the culture dish provided a vertical excursion




of the test suspension for additional mixing.  Flow of the test suspen-




sion into the chambers, calibrated daily, was approximately 90 ml/min.




       69.  Bioassays were maintained at a temperature of 21° + 1°C,




salinity was 28+2 ppt, and illumination was 1000 lux on a 12-hr light




cycle.  Dissolved oxygen was measured on days 1 and 4 of the 4-day tests,




The suspended particulate concentration was measured in both treatments
                                   50

-------
daily with an electronic particle counter.  For a period of 8 days,




particle counts were made daily from the splitters, exposure chambers,




and exposure cups to determine the consistency of the suspended particle




density.  Thereafter, counts were made daily in the exposure chambers




only.




       70.  Five 24- to 30-hr postrelease juveniles were randomly distri-




buted into each of three exposure cups per two replicates for a total




of 30 animals per treatment.  Each cup was fed 24-hr posthatch reference




Artemia salina daily, and removed after 96 hr exposure to monitor mor-




tality.




       71.  The suspended particulate phase Ampelisca exposure system




was similar to that used for the bivalve molluscs (Figure 8).  In




addition, in these studies, intermediate exposures of BRH sediment




between 100 percent BRH and 0 percent BRH (100% REF) were used.  To




achieve varying degrees of exposure to the dredged material, but still




maintain constant particle densities, a siphon and collection tube




from both suspension systems (REF and BRH) were directed to a single




exposure chamber.  For example, to get one third BRH and two thirds




REF (33 percent BRH exposure) at 60 ml/min, 20 ml/min of BRH and 40




ml/min of REF would be combined.  A 66 percent exposure would be just




the opposite:  40 ml/min BRH and 20 ml/min REF.  Flow rates were meas-




ured daily.  The bioassay monitoring schedule was identical to that




previously described for solid phase .tests with Ampelisca.
                                   51

-------
                                   Fishes






       72.  Five species of fishes were exposed to solid phase BRH mate-




rial and four species to suspended particulate phase BRH material.  Two




species, the Atlantic silverside (Menidia menidia) and sheepshead minnow




(Cyprinodon variegatus), have been used routinely in aquatic toxicology;




the remaining three, the American sand lance (Ammodytes americanus),




summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus), and winter flounder




(Pseudopleuronectes americanus), have not been routinely used but




represent fish species likely to be directly exposed to the disposal




of dredged material.  Menidia menidia and £. variegatus are estuarine




species that spawn their demersal, adhesive eggs in salt marsh areas




during the warm months of the year.  Ammodytes americanus is an early




winter spawner that deposits its eggs in or on sand substrates.




Paralichthys dentatus ranges inshore to well offshore and spawns in




the winter and produces a pelagic egg whereas P^. americanus is a near-




shore species that spawns in the early spring and produces a demersal




egg mass.






Collection, culture, and holding




       73.  Menidia menidia (Atlantic silverside) eggs and larvae were




obtained from field-collected adults (Succotash salt marsh, Rhode Island)




that were induced to spawn in the laboratory.  The spawning method was




that described by Middaugh and Takita (1983) with some minor changes:




current velocity was not altered to mimic tidal flow in some of the




spawning tanks and a flow-through seawater system was used rather
                                   52

-------
 than a recirculating system.  Seawater temperature was maintained at




 18° to 20°C and salinity range was 28 to 30 ppt.  Eggs were released




 and fertilized by adults onto acrylic fiber mats approximately 20 x




 20 x 10 cm.  Mats containing eggs were transferred to 5-L hatching




 jars within 48 hr of fertilization and gently aerated.  Newly hatched




 fish were initially fed rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis_), followed by




 a daily feeding of newly hatched Artemia sp. (reference strain, Sorgeloos




 1980) after the first 2 days.  Embryo development, hatching, and larval




 development took place within a temperature range of 18° to 21°C and a




 salinity range of 29 to 31 ppt.




       74.  Cyprinodon variegatus (sheepshead minnow) larvae were obtained




 from eggs spawned in the laboratory.  The methods used were similar to




 those by Hansen et al.  (1978).  Adult sheepshead, obtained from a salt




marsh on Santa Rosa Island, Escambia County, Florida, were kept in a




 160-L aquarium supplied with flowing seawater (300 ml/min).  The tem-




perature in the tank was 26°C (25.5° to 26.5°C) and the salinity was




 30 ppt (29 to 31 ppt).  The fish were contained in a nylon basket in




the tank so that the eggs spawned fell through the bottom of the basket




and onto a collecting screen below.  The eggs were incubated at 20°




to 23°C.  (One set of eggs, those used in replicate 1 of the second




suspended phase test, were incubated at 30°C to accelerate hatching.)




After hatching, the larvae were fed reference (Sorgeloos  1980) brine




shrimp (Artemia sp.) daily.



       75.  Ammodytes americanus (American sand lance) adults were col-




lected from the Merrimac River, Massachusetts, in November 1982 and
                                   53

-------
transported to ERL-N.*  They were maintained at ambient seawater temper-

ature in  1.1-m-diam tanks containing approximately 5 cm of sand.  From

November  1982 through January 1983 the water temperature decreased

from 15°  to 8°C and the photoperiod was changed from 11 hr light to

9 hr light.  At 8°C the adults were spawned artificially into basins

and the eggs were coated with diatomaceous earth.  The embryos were

transferred to mesh baskets suspended in basins of seawater.  The

basins were maintained in an incubator at 8.0° to 10.2°C.  Photoperiod

increased from 9 to 12 hr light; salinity was maintained at 28 to 32

ppt (by the addition of deionized water), and the seawater was gently

aerated.  The larvae were maintained under identical .conditions and

immediately after hatching were fed rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis).

Larvae for the suspended particulate tests were provided by the NMFS

Laboratory, Narragansett, R.I., and maintained under the conditions

described above until testing.

       76.  Summer flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) were obtained from

natural spawnings of laboratory-held brood stock at the NMFS-Narragan-

sett, R.I.  The eggs were spawned in 18°C and 30 ppt salinity seawater

and hatched 3 days later.  The larvae were reared in black plastic

containers as described by Klein-MacPhee (1981).  The average rearing

temperature was 14°C (13.6° to 15.2°C), salinity averaged 30 ppt (29

to 30 ppt).
*  The taxonomy of the sand lance in the literature is unclear; however,
       the fish collected most closely ressembled A.  americanus; per-
       sonal communication, Mr. Lawrence Buckley, National Marine
       Fisheries Service (NMFS), Narragansett, R.I.
                                    54

-------
       77.  Larvae were fed laboratory-cultured rotifers (B. plicatilis)




for approximately 3 weeks when they were fed newly hatched reference




strain (Klein-MacPhee, Howe11,and Beck 1982) Artemia nauplii.  They




were then transferred to 47-cm-diam fiberglass tanks supplied with




filtered, flowing seawater at 16° + 1°C and 29 to 30 ppt.  After meta-




morphosis, which occurred in 90 percent of the animals at 7 weeks




posthatch, the juveniles were used only in the solid phase toxicity




tests as there were insufficient animals to conduct the suspended




sediment tests.




       78.  Adult winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) were




collected in Narragansett Bay, R.I., in November and December 1982.




The fish were transported to ERL-N and maintained in 2.4-m-diam tanks




provided with flowing seawater at ambient temperature and salinity




(2.4° to 12.2°C, 27 to 30 ppt).  They were allowed to ripen naturally




and the fish first spawned 7 February 1983.  The eggs of a single




female were stripped manually into a plastic dishpan treated with




diatomaceous earth/Co prevent clumping (Smigielski and Arnold 1972).




Incubation techniques, collection, and rearing are described in Klein-




MacPhee, Howell, and Beck (1982).  Incubation temperature and salinities




ranged from 3.8° to 5.2°C and 28 to 30 ppt, respectively, and larvae




hatched 6 to 8 days postfertilization.  Larval-rearing temperatures




and salinities ranged from 8.5° to 9.6°C and 28 to 30 ppt, respectively.




Winter flounder larvae were fed in a- manner similar to summer flounder




and were switched to reference strain (Sorgeloos 1980) Artemia approxi-




mately 1 month posthatch.
                                   55

-------
       79.  A second batch of eggs were obtained on 23 February 1983.




Embryos and larvae were cultured as described above; incubation tempera-




tures and salinities ranged from 4.2° to 6.1°C and 28 to 30 ppt, respec-




tively.  Larval rearing temperatures and salinities varied from 7.6° to




9.3°C and 27 to 30 ppt, respectively.






Solid phase tests




       80.  Menidia menidia solid phase tests were conducted in 19-cm-




diam by 10-cm-
-------
 water quality.   Larvae were  fed  daily with  approximately 30% body wet




 weight of  newly  hatched reference brine shrimp.




        83.  Cyprinodon variegatus solid phase  tests were conducted as




 described  for Menidia  menidia above.  The tests were conducted at 20°




 to  22°C and  28 to  30 ppt  salinity, at flow  rates of 45 to 50 ml/min




 (Table B33 and B34).   The test larvae were  fed newly hatched reference




 brine shrimp on  day 0, 1, 2, and 3 for the  first test and only on day




 zero  in the  second test.  Dissolved oxygen  measurements were taken




 only  during  the  second test.




        84.   Ammodytes  americanus embryonic  solid phase tests were con-




 ducted  using the same  general exposure chamber design described for




 annelid solid phase tests.  Embryos were placed inside sediment-covered,




 mesh-bottomed glass tubes (45 X  15 mm) settled into 300 ml of sediment




 contained  in 110-mm-diam glass finger bowls, with two embryo chambers




 (five embryos per chamber) per finger bowl.  Two finger bowls were




 submerged  in a 30-L water bath (9.0° to 11.5°C and 28 to 32 ppt salin-




 ity).   Siphons and a central water well ensured an oxygenated flow of




 water  over the embryos.  Two tests were conducted using seawater (SW)




 and REF controls and 25%, 50%, 75%,  and 100% BRH. (Tables B37 and B38).




 Samples of the sediment were taken for moisture content as described




 for molluscs.




       85.  Ammodytes americanus larval solid phase tests were conducted




 in finger bowls (85 mm diameter) surrounded by 250-y mesh,  creating




 a column 80  to 90 mm high.  The mesh column was welded together at the




seam and glued to the finger bowl with silicone adhesive.   Each cup




 held 100 ml of sediment and two or three  chambers were placed in a






                                   57

-------
water bath to a depth 10 to 20 ram below the top of the 250-^  mesh




column.  Five larvae were placed per dish.  Test conditions ranged




from 9.0° to 11.0°C, 26 to 30 ppt salinity, and 12 hr light (Tables




B39 to B44).  Two tests were conducted using the three concentrations:




SW, 100% REF, and 100% BRH; and four using the six concentrations




mentioned under the embryonic tests (Tables B39-B44).  Larvae were fed




rotifers (Brachionus plicatilis) twice daily at a concentration of 2




to  3 rotifers/ml or greater.  Dissolved oxygen measurements  were




taken only during the final test.




       86.  Paralichthys dentatus (summer flounder) larvae were exposed




to the REF and BRH sediments in the manner described above for the




Menidia menidia solid phase tests except that the fish were fed brine




shrimp at the rate of approximately 100% of their body weight per day.




In the first test the temperature varied from 20.2° to 20.8°C.  The




salinity was 30 ppt throughout the test, and the flow rates varied




from 42 to 45 ml/mln (Tables B47 and B48).




       87.  Psuedopleuronectes americanus (winter flounder) larvae were




exposed to REF and BRti sediments in the manner described above for




the Menidia menidia solid phase tests except that all fish dead or




missing after 24 hr were assumed to have died or been lost as a result




of handling and were replaced.  The flow rate in these tests  was 37




ml/min and the temperature varied from 9.0 to 11.0°C.  In the first




test the salinity varied from 30 to 32 ppt, in the second it varied




from 26 to 29 ppt (Tables B49 and B50).
                                   58

-------
Suspended particulate phase tests




       88.  Menidia menidia suspended particulate tests were conducted




in the same crystallization dishes described in the solid phase tests




above, and included 600 ml/dish of BRH or REF sediment in the appro-




priate treatment dishes.  Treatments used for these tests were:




seawater controls (no sediment or particulates), BRH (25 mg/L), and




REF (25 mg/L).  In these tests, the inflowing seawater or seawater and




suspended particulates were introduced to each dish by the distribution




chambers previously described (Figure 7).  Each inflow discharged into




a 150-ml beaker located in the center of each dish, and a spinning




stir bar maintained the particulates in suspension in the beaker.  The




lip of this beaker was higher than the water level of the crystalliza-




tion dish to protect fish larvae from the mixing vortex.




       89.  Two tests were performed using 12 larvae per treatment, and




each treatment was replicated once.  Flow rates for these tests were 80




to 90 ml/min;  temperature and salinity ranges were 19.6° to 20.3°C and




26 to 30 ppt, respectively.  Suspended particulate concentration was




measured by dry weight of a 100-ml water sample and two Coulter counts




from each treatment (dish) over the course of the test.  Dishes were




monitored daily for temperature, salinity, flow rate, and number of




larvae live, moribund, or dead.  Dissolved oxygen concentrations were




measured midway through the exposure period.   Fish larvae were fed a




daily ration of 30% body wet weight of newly  hatched reference brine




shrimp (Tables B31 and B32).  High daily rations were needed because of




the relatively high flow rates.
                                   59

-------
       90.  Cyprinodon variegatus suspended particulate tests were con-




ducted as described for Menidia menidia above at a temperature of




19.3° to 20.1°C at a flow rate of 80 to 90 ml/min.  During the first




suspended particulate test the salinity ranged from 25 to 26 ppt,  and




during the second test, from 28 to 29 ppt (Tables B35 and B36).




       91.  Ammodytes americanus suspended particulate tests were con-




ducted as described above for Menidia menidia, except 15 larvae were




used per treatment and larvae lost or dead within 24 hr of the beginning




of the test were replaced.  During the two tests the temperature ranged




from 8.2° to 11.6°C, the salinity from 28 to 30 ppt, and the flow




rates from 89 to 90 ml/min (Tables B45 and B46).  The larvae were 28




to 32 days old (obtained from NMFS, Narragansett) and were fed rotifers




(Brachionus plicatilis) twice daily.




       92.  Pseudopleuronectes americanus suspended particulate tests




were conducted as described for Menidia menidia, except that larvae




lost or dead within 24 hr of the beginning of the test were replaced.




The temperature in the exposure chambers containing no sediment in




the suspended particulate tests varied from 8.2° to 10.2°C, the temper-




atures in the exposure chambers containing sediment were slightly




higher (9.0° to il.l°C in REF and 9.8° to 12.7°C in BRH).,  The flow




rate varied from 85 to 95 ml/min in the first test, and from 80 to 90




ml/min in the second.  In the first test (Table B51) the salinity




varied from 26 to 29 ppt; in the second test (Table B52) the salinity




was constant at 28 ppt.
                                   60

-------
                    PART V:  RESULTS AND DISCUSSION








                       Chemical Characterization






Organic contaminants




       93. Mussel analysis.  Results of analyses of the 28-day exposed




mussels by GC/MS are shown by the total ion current profiles of frac-




tions PF-50 and F-2 in Figure 9.  The richness of these two traces is




in marked contrast to the traces shown in Figure 10 for the control




mussels.  Within the PF-50 fraction of the exposed mussels (Figure 9)




there are large quantities of naturally occurring biogenic compounds




which also show up in Figure lOa.  The large humplike structure in




Figure 9 is known as the Unresolved Complex Mixture which is frequently




seen in association with petroleum contamination, and consists primarily




of hydrocarbons of an aliphatic nature (Boehm and Quinn 1977; Stegeman




and Teal 1973).  The high resolution capillary column run of this




fraction was examined for unknown organic compounds of a nonaliphatic




structure.  In addition to DDE and the PCB isomers containing from two




to eight chlorine atoms, evidence was found which suggests that many




unusual compounds exist in this fraction.  However, even with the




extreme resolution afforded by the 4°C/min runs on 30-m capillary




columns, the coelution of many compounds effectively hinders the deter-




mination of a complete spectrum for any given compound.  Although




tentative identifications were not possible, the incomplete spectra




could still be used as recognizable characteristics of the dredged




material.
                                   61

-------
   100
tn
5
               1000       2000       3000


                         a. FRACTION PF-50
  4000
            Scon Number
  100
CO

u
      A*A—L—J&1U
      1000
                   2000         3000
                        b.  FRACTION F-2
4000
                                                         Scan Number
   Figure 9.  Total  ion  current profiles oi the 28-day exposed
   mussels analyzed  by GC-MS  with a 4°/min (50-330) temperature
                         programming rate

-------
  100
       500
   1000           1500

    a.  FRACTION  PF-50
     2000  Scan  Number
  100-
z
      IOOO
2000         3000

    b.  FRACTION  F- 2
4000
                                                         Scan Number
  Figure  10.   Total ion current profiles of  the  28-day  control
  mussels  analyzed by GC-MS with a 4°/min  (50-330)  temperature
                        programming rate
                                63

-------
       94. PCB's were analyzed by both capillary column electron cap-

ture gas chromatography for the total quantity of material present

measured as Aroclor 1254, and by GC/MS for their relative chlorine

number distributions.  Both results are shown in Table 4.  The chlorine

number distributions were calculated from uncorrected mass spectrometer

molecular ion area measurements and so do not reflect differences in

response factors for different PCB's.
                                Table 4
          Single Replicate PCB Concentrations as Aroclor® 1254

in
ng/g Dry Weight Including Chlorine
Number Distributions by Mass Spectrometry

Sample
Day 0
Day 28
Control
Day 7
Exposed
Day 14
Exposed
Day 28
Exposed
BRH
Sediment

Total
PCB
ng/g
74
84
2000
1100
3000
6800


di tri
0 6
2 9
37 390
34 240
58 600
130 960

Clx PCB
tetra penta hexa hepta
22 24 20 2
22 22 20 3
740 520 290 30
420 310 89 6
960 890 420 67
2500 1500 1500 130


octa
0
0
1
0
0
3
                                   64

-------
       95. Aromatic hydrocarbons form a class of compounds that are




strongly accumulated by mussels from Black Rock Harbor sediment.  This




class can be divided into two groups: the parent polynuclear aromatic




hydrocarbons, and their alkylated homologs.  There has been no attempt




made to quantitate each structural isomer of the parent aromatic hydro-




carbons, or to identify the particular structural or positional isomer




of their alkyl homologs.  Rather, the alkyl homologs are identified as




being associated with a particular molecular weight parent PAH which




has been substituted with alkyl chains having a total of from 1 to 4




carbon atoms.  These are referred to as C-l to C-4 substituents, and




could refer to any combination of methyl-, ethyl-, prppyl-, or butyl-




groups which might add up to the correct number of alkyl substituent




carbons.




       96.  Table 5 lists the parent PAH's found in this study, along




with their molecular weights.  The molecular weights form a convenient




short-hand notation for these compounds when referring to the parent




compounds,  and, with the addition of the C-l and C-4 nomenclature




mentioned above, their homologs as well.  Also because of chromato-




graphic overlap, alkyl homolog distributions (AHD's) of different




PAH's having the same molecular weight cannot be separated except in




the case of the two 154's.  Thus, for consistency, all PAH's of a




given molecular weight should be treated as a single measurement when




being compared with alkyl homolog distributions.




       97.  Appendix Tables A1-A7 list the PAH concentrations and the




concentrations of each alkyl homolog, including the variability asso-




ciated with the three replicates measured on the mussel samples.







                                   65

-------
                               Table 5
Parent Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons Found in the Exposed Mussels
                    and Black Rock Harbor Sediment
  Compound                                           Molecular Weight


 Naphthalene                                              128

 Biphenyl                                                 154-Bi

 Acenaphthene                                             154-An

 Fluorene                                                 166

 Phenanthrene
 Anthracene                                               178

 Pyrene
 Fluoranthene                                             202

 Benz(a)anthracene
 Chrysene                                                 228
 Tripherylene

 Benzofluoranthenes
 Benzopyrenes                                             252
 Perylene

 Benzoperylene
 Dibenzopyrene                                            276
 and others

 Dibenzanthracenes
 Benzocrysenes                                            278
 and others

 Coronene
 or similar                                               300

 Dibenzocrysenes
 and others                                               302
                                  66

-------
Response  factors  for  the alkyl horaologs were assumed to be the same as




the parent PAH.   This leads to low but reproducible estimates of the




homolog concentrations.  Also, response factors for the 154's, 166,




and those over 276 were estimated as described above.  Tables 6 and 7




are summary tables of the aromatic hydrocarbon data; the average PAH




concentration for each treatment is shown in Table 6, and the concen-




tration of the sum of each alkyl homolog distribution from C-l to C-4




is shown in Table 7.




       98. The total  ion current profile of the day 28 control mussels




(Figure lOb) contains five peaks that have been tentatively identified




as silicones.  These  identifications are based on library spectra




matches and isotope ratio calculations for silicon.  Spectra and reten-




tion time of authentic standards were not yet available to verify




their identifications.  However, the compounds have spectra similar to




dodecamethylcyclohexasiloxane and decamethylcyclopentasiloxane.  There




were a series of five of these peaks which could be measured in most




samples.  Table 8 lists the results of these measurements, expressed




as arbitrary area counts per gram of mussel (or sediment) dry weight.




This allows measurements made between samples of different weight to be




compared even though there were no standards available with which valid




quantitations could be obtained.  Although the exposed mussels seem to




take up these siloxane compounds, the day 28 control samples had consid-




erably more of them and the Black Rock Harbor sediment had no more




than the analytical blank.   Therefore, these contaminants seem to




originate from the dosing system and not from the sediment.
                                   67

-------
                           Table 6
Mean Concentrations ± Standard Deviation of Parent PAH Compounds
found in Exposed and Control Mussels and in
Black Rock Harbor Sediment in ng/g Dry Weight






PAH Concentration, ng/g Dry Weight
Compound
128
154Bi
154AN
166
178
202
228
252
276
278
300
302
Day
0
0.8
+0.4
1.3
+0.2
0.7
+0.4
1.4
+0.4
7.2
+1.6
34
+8
8.5
+2.3
15
+5
3.3
+0.7
<0.4
<0.1
<0.3
Day
7
0.5
+0.1
1.9
+0.6
3.6
+0.8
14
+1
220
+25
2600
+460
1800
+230
1300
+230
250
+67
140
+26
11
+2.8
66
+13
Day
14
1.1
+0.3
2.9
+1.0
4.7
+1.2
8.3
+1.3
140
+21
1100
+160
840
+160
610
+100
120
+22
68
+17
2.9
+0.9
17
+5
Day
28
0.6
+0.3
3.5
+2.1
3.8
+1.8
12
+3.7
180
+35
2000
+470
1800
+360
1600
+210
280
+50
160
+20
9.3
+0.8
56
+9
Day
28 Control
0.5
+1.0
5.3
+2.0
1.2
+0.2
1.2
+0.4
6.7
+1.5
19
+2.5
3.1
+1.1
5.8
+1.7
1.6
+0.9
<0.6
<0.1
<0.1

Black Rock
Harbor
Sediment
17
54
120
370
2700
7100
9800
8600
9100
4400
130
2700
                              68

-------
                                 Table 7
     Mean Concentrations ±  Standard  Deviation of  the Sum of  C-l  Through
C-4


Alkyl Homologs of PAH
in Black Rock Harbor

I C-l through C-4
Day Day
Compound 0 7
128
154B1
154AN
166
178
202
228
252
8.6 390
+2.9 +120
9.7 710
+2.2 +92
3.0 300
+1.0 +41
14 1100
+3.4 +130
38 5600
+6.7 +990
12 3500
+1.9 +650
5.9 1500
+1.6 +290
<6 510
+100
's Found
Sediment

in Exposed and Control
Quantitated

Alkyl Homologs, ng/g
Day
14
270
+65
450
+150
160
+15
540
+110
2600
+500
1600
+290
710
+150
220
+45
Day
28
300
+100
720
+230
280
+80
1100
+250
5000
+1400
3400
+690
1800
+290
590
+79
Mussels and
as Each Parent PAH

Dry Weight
Day
28 Control
16
+2.3
27
+3.5
7.8
+0.8
23
+4.8
39
+7.1
7.7
+2.9
1.3
+0.6
<5

Black Rock
Harbor
Sediment
3400
2900
1100
3400
13000
8300
13000
4800
       99.  The mass spectrometric data of the day 28 mussel F-2 frac-

tion was also examined in detail for other compounds of interest which

might be hidden by the high aromatic hydrocarbon content of the sample.

The molecular weights of the aromatic hydrocarbons form a steadily

increasing elution series as the temperature of the gas chromatograph

is increased.  The mass spectral data collected above the molecular

weights of the currently eluting aromatics can be examined at high
                                   69

-------
                                Table 8
        Distribution of Five Silicone-like Compounds in Exposed
and Control Mussels and
Black Rock Harbor Sediment Measured
as GC/MS Area Counts/Gram Dry Weight



Response of
GC/MS
Scan
Number
1277
1619
1927
2194
2432
Day
0
7200
+3300
6200
+500
28,000
+1000
10,000
+800
5700
+5500
Day
7
17,000
+1500
39,000
+2100
79,000
+6700
41,000
+4400
9900
+1000


Silicone-like Peaks
Day
14
18,000
+2500
15,000
+3200
12,000
+1700
5400
+560
2100
+210
Day
28
23,000
+5900
48,000
+17,000
86,000
+39,000
45,000
+21,000
10,000
+4100

Per Gram Dry
Day
28 Control
28,000
+2600
550,000
+120,000
1140,000
+150,000
412,000
+73,000
53,000
+13,000

Weight
Sediment
1800
1500
480
480
330
sensitivity for the presence of anomalously heavy compounds.  Many of

these compounds tend to be chlorinated organics because of the increased

weight of the chlorine substituents.  Several members of the DDT series

were identified in this manner as was a compound tentatively identified

as Ethylan, another chlorinated insecticide.  In addition to these

identified compounds, this technique extracted the spectra of numerous

other contaminants which have yet to be identified, many of which may

contain oxygen.  Although not yet identified, these spectra and reten-

tion times can serve as identification labels or fingerprints for the

same compounds in further laboratory or field studies.
                                   70

-------
        100.  Sediment analysis.  The Black Rock Harbor sediment material




has been analyzed for the same contaminants as decribed for the mussels,




with  the exception  of the anonamously heavy F-2 components.  Figure 11




shows the sediment  total ion current profiles for the PF-50 and F-2




fractions.   Although the PF-50 fractions show some qualitative differ-




ences compared to the day 28 exposed mussel PF-50 fraction in Figure




9, the  F-2 fraction is very similar to the exposed mussel F-2 shown in




Figure  10.   PCB's in the sediment were measured both by capillary




column  electron capture gas chromatography and by mass spectrometry.




The gas chromatographic measurements were quantitated against Aroclor®




1254, while  the mass spectrometry measurements were for chlorine number




distributions.  Both measurements are reported in Table 4 along with




the mussel results.




      -  101.  The same polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon measurements were




made for the sediment as for the mussels.  The alkyl homolog distribu-




tions in Black Rock Harbor sediment for each of the PAH's from 128 to




302 are shown with those of the mussels in Appendix A.  Tables A1-A7




contain the  tabulated concentrations of each PAH and each alkyl homolog




concentration from C-l through C-4.  Sediment concentrations are sum-




marized in Table 9.



        102. Accumulation.  The results of the sediment characterization




mussel bioaccumulation study show that both PCB's and aromatic hydro-




carbons were accumulated from Black Rock Harbor sediment in as little




as 7 days.   Total PCB's, measured by capillary column gas chromatography




using electron capture and quantitating against Aroclor® 1254, show a




large increase in the exposed mussels over the levels in both the






                                   71

-------
  100 n
      1000
2000          3000


   a. FRACTION PF-50
4000
Scon Number
   100
t
CO

UJ
       1000
2000          3000


   b. FRACTION F-2
4000
Scan Number
 Figure 11.  Total ion current  profiles of the Black Rock  Harbor

           FVP sediment analyzed  by GC-MS with a 4°/min
              (50-330) temperature  programming rate
                                 72

-------
                                Table 9
  Organic Contaminants in Black Rock Harbor Sediment, ng/g Dry Weight,


Compound

128
154 Bi
154 An
166
178
202
228
252
276
278
300
302
PCB's
One Replicate

Concentration
PAH
17
54
120
370
2700
7100
9800
8600
9100
4400
130
2700
6800



AMD
3400
2900
1100
3400
13000
8300
13000
4800
-
-
-
—

pre-exposed and the day 28 controls, as shown in Table 4.  Both con-

trols remained quite constant at about 80 ng/g dry weight, while the

three exposure period samples showed uptake to between 1100 and 3000

ng/g dry weight.  There is an increase in the PCB levels as the exposure

time increases, although the value at day 14 is anomalously low for

unknown reasons.  By the end of the 28-day uptake period, the mussels

had accumulated PCB's to a level approaching half of that in the sedi-

ment, while at day 7 they had accumulated levels that were almost one

third that of the sediment.  Both sampling periods demonstrate a sizable

uptake of PCB's and indicate the clear biological availability of this

contaminant.
                                   73

-------
       103. Table 4 also shows the distribution of PCB isomers into the




various chlorine number groups from two chlorine atoms per molecule to




eight chlorine atoms per molecule.  The lower chlorine number groups




correspond to PCB compounds having relatively low log P (octanol-water




partition coefficient) values, while the higher chlorine number groups




have relatively higher log P values.  The two control samples, day 0




and day 28 control, are similar in the amount and pattern of their PCB




distributions, although there are some minor differences at chlorine




numbers 4, 5, and 6.  These similarities are consistent with lower




Narragansett Bay mussels being held in a control tank with filtered




lower Narragansett Bay water flowing through.




       104. The three exposure times also show remarkably similar PCB




patterns.  The day 28 exposed sample shows slightly elevated levels of




Cl-5 and Cl-6 PCB's, but these differences are quite small.  A compar-




ison of the PCB patterns of the three exposed samples with that of the




Black Rock Harbor sediment in Table 4 reveals that there are no large




pattern changes even between the sediment and the exposed mussels.




The mussels may have accumulated slightly more of the Cl-3 PCB's than




were present in the sediment, and they might have accumulated slightly




less of the Cl-6 PCB's than were in the sediment.




       105. Aromatic hydrocarbons form the second class of chemical




contaminants which are strongly accumulated by mussels exposed to Black




Rock Harbor sediment.  Tables 6 and 7 summarize the data for the con-




centrations of both parent PAH and for the sum of the alkyl homolog




series from C-l to C-4.  The amount of parent PAH's taken up by the




exposed organisms compared with that in the sediment and the control






                                   74

-------
organisms is shown in Figure 12, while the amount of the summed alkyl

homologs is shown in Figure 13 for the same samples.  The biological

availability of aromatic hydrocarbons in the sediment is dramatic.  The

concentration of the most intense PAH's, 202 to 252, shows an increase

of a factor of about 100 over control concentrations.  In contrast to

these dramatic uptakes after only a week of exposure, the levels do

not markedly increase over the subsequent 21 days.   As with the PCB's,

the 14-day sample is anomalously low.
    10000-
    5000-
 < •
 Z
 -.-:
 ' <
                      Sediment
                      Day  7
                      Day  28
                      Day  14
                      CONTROL
                  T    T    r         i     i    |    T    r    r    F
                  128  154  154   166  178  202  228  252  276 278  300 302
                       Bi    An

                                  MOLECULAR  WEIGHT

    Figure 12.   Concentration of PAH compounds in Black Rock Harbor
               sediment and exposed and  control  mussels
                                   75

-------
               13000-
               10000-
                5OOO-
              2
                         128  154  154  166  178 202 228 252
                            Bi  An
                                   MOLECULAR WEIGHT
   Figure 13.  Concentration of sum of C-l  through  C-4  alkyl  homologs
    of PAH's measured in Black Rock Harbor  sediment and control  and
                            exposed mussels
       106. In contrast to the PCB patterns, which  showed  similar  uptake

for each isoraer, the PAH patterns are  quite  variable.   The maximum

uptake is near PAH 202, where the mussels' levels are  approximately one

third of the sediment levels.  However,  for  early PAH's from 128 to

166, mussel uptake levels are only about  5%  of  the  sediment levels and,

for PAH's above 252, the uptake may be even  smaller than 5%.  If one

can assume that the PAH's are all in a form  equally biologically avail-

able, which has not yet been  shown, then  it  follows that the mussels

are selecting a particular fraction of the PAH's  for uptake which is

not based on log P since the  octanol-water partitioning coefficient

for PAH's continues to increase as molecular weight increases.


                                    76

-------
        107.  Table 7  shows  approximately  the  same  pattern for  the  summed




 alkyl  homologs  as for  the  PAH's.   The  lighter  PAH homologs are  present




 in the mussels  at levels around  10%  of the levels in  the sediment,




 while  the homologs of  the  most concentrated  PAH's,  178 and 202, are




 present in  the  mussels at  levels  nearly  one  third those  of the  sediment.




 Again,  the heavier PAH homolog ratios  decrease to about  10% of  the




 sediment values.  The  homologs of PAH's  above  252 were hardly detectable




 in the  mussels  at all.  Therefore, the mussels are  selecting a  similar




 fraction of  the alkyl  homologs as they did for the PAH's.  Assuming




 equal availability,  this again is not  consistent  with a  strict  log P




 uptake  model.






 Inorganic contaminants




        108. Mussels.   Due  to the  limited sample size  (approximately 2




g  of homogenized  wet weight of tissue), only Fe and Zn could be deter-




mined by conventional  flame atomic absorption.  All other elements




 (i.e.,  Mn, Cu,  Pb, Cd,  Cr, and As) were determined by heated graphite




atomization.  The amount of sample available to do  the mercury analysis




by  the  cold vapor technique was inadequate to detect low concentrations




of mercury.  Nickel  could not be  reliably determined on  this limited




sample  size even with HGA-AA.  The average and the standard deviation




of  the  average  for each set of mussel  samples collected from the con-




trol and exposure chambers are given in Table 10.  All of the individ-




ual elemental concentrations determined for the mussel samples are




given in Table A10.  The average method blank for the mussel samples




is also given in  Table A10.  The  average method blank was
                                   77

-------
calculated by dividing the average absolute ug value for each element

by the average homogenized mussel dry weight.  All elements (except

Cu) determined in the blanks were below the detection limits of the

analysis methodology employed in this study.  The percent recovery of

metal spikes added to the mussel samples prior to analysis are given

in Table All.  The percent spike recovery for all elements determined

in the mussel samples was greater than 80% and less than 110%.
                               Table 10
    Distribution of Trace Elements in  yg/g Dry Weight in Exposed and


Control

Mussels

Trace Metal Concentration,
Element
Fe
SD
Mn
SD
Zn
SD
Cu
SD
Pb
SD
Cd
SD
Cr
SD
As
SD
Day
0
199
± 26
11
± 0.7
149
± 76
25
± 23
4.7
± 0.1
2.7
± 0.3
2.3
± 0.3
8.2
± 0.6
Day
7
357
± 41
12
+ 3
286
± 58
62
± 23
11
± 1.5
4.7
± 0.7
15
± 1.6
8.6
± 1.0
Day
14
330
± 6
31
± 10
160
± 18
75
± 7
8.5
± 0.9
3.1
± 0.5
12
± 1.3
7.3
± 0.4


Ug/g Dry Weight
Day
28
500
± 191
11
± 4.9
333
± 84
55 '
± 18
14
± 4.7
7.0
± 1.9
25
± 11
8.9
± 1.1
Day
28 Control
213
± 7
13
± 7
221
± 63
17
± 5
6.5
± 2.6
2.8
± 0.5
2.0
± 0.5
7.4
± 1.0
                                   78

-------
        109.  Sediments.   The inorganic chemical  composition for  the  two




 barrels (#00 and  #LL) of Black Rock Harbor  sediment  is given in Table




 11.   The average,  standard deviation of  the average,  and  the percent




 standard deviation of the average are given.  The wet to  dry weight




 ratio is also given for the two barrels  of  sediment.  All of the data




 used  to calculate  these averages are given  in Tables A8 and A9  for




 Barrel #00 and Barrel #LL,  respectively.  The metal  concentrations for




 the two blank samples for each barrel are also  given in Tables  A8 and




 A9.   The blank metal concentrations are  given in units of yg/g  to




 easily show  the large difference between the samples and  the blanks.




 The average  dry weight  values  calculated for the two sets of barrel




 samples were  used  to convert the absolute ug values to ug/g concen-




 trations for  an easy comparison to  the samples.  No values for  As are




 listed  in  this  table since a chemical  interference was detected during




 the analysis  (for  both  HGA-AA  and MHS-1 hydride generation techniques)




 of these sediment  samples.  At  this  time the cause of the chemical




 interference  for the As determinations for  BRH  sediment samples is




 under  investigation.  The overall results indicate that the BRH barrel




 samples are reasonably  homogeneous  between  barrrels if reasonable




 precautions are taken to  remix each barrel before being sampled.  What




 appear  to  be  small differences between Fe and Mn for the  barrels are




 probably due  to the  two different preparation techniques  that were




 used  to dissolve the metals that were determined.  The #00 samples




were dissolved in hot concentrated nitric acid while the  #LL samples




were  simply eluted with 5% nitric acid at room temperature.  The simi-




larity of the results indicates that the metals reported here are






                                   79

-------
                               Table  11
   Average Metal  Concentrations  in Black Rock Harbor Barrel  #00 and


Element
Fe
SD
%SD
Mn
SD
%SD
Zn
SD
%SD
Cu
SD
%SD
Pb
SD
%SD
Cd
SD
%SD
Cr
SD
%SD
Ni
SD
%SD
Hg
SD
%SD
wet/dry
SD
%SD
Barrel #LL Sediment Samples*

Barrel #00
29,600
809
2
359
37
10
1200
59
4
2380
112
4
378
16
4
23.4
0.9
3.7
1430
77
5
139
4
3
1.7
0.1
4.0
3.22
.02
1


Barrel #LL
29,600
623
2
280
5
1
1210
50
4
2540
64
2
413
18
4
24.7
0.7
2.9
1300
30
2
169
5
3
-
—
—
3.03
0.17
5.6
*  All concentrations are in yg/g dry weight.
  and percent standard deviation are also given.
                                   80

-------
 probably  all  present  as  sulfides  or  some  other  easily  solubilized




 anion.  Manganese has a  difference of about 30% for the two barrels of




 sediment.   This  difference  is  undoubtedly related  to the  two  preparation




 techniques  prior to analysis.   It should  be pointed out that  the two




 preparation techniques were used  simply to ascertain the  magnitude of




 differences that would be obtained by the two acid extraction methods.




        110. Accumulation.   Statistically  (Student-t test, P <0.05) there




 is no difference between the mean time zero mussel control samples and




 the mean  28-day  mussel control  samples.   There  is no significant differ-




 ence between  the mean Mn, Zn, and As in the control and exposed samples




 for the 28th  day sampling period  (P<0.05).  However, there is a signif-




 icant difference between the means for the 28-day control mussel samples




 and the 28-day exposed mussel samples for all of the other elements




 determined.   The elemental  ratios (calculated from the data in Table




 All) of the 28-day exposure mussel samples and  the 28-day control




 mussel samples show that a  significant uptake of several of the trace




 elements had  occurred in the mussel test  organism.  These data are




 presented in  Table 12.   The elemental ratios of the 28-day control




 mussels and the  day 0 control mussel samples are also given in this




 table.  Any elemental ratio that approximates 1 (talcing the standard




 deviation into account)  indicates no significant uptake or change in




 content for that element in the test organism.  Essentially, all the




 control sample ratios are not different from 1, if the standard devia-




 tion is taken into account.  For the day  28 dosed samples, however,




 only Mn and As have a ratio of approximately 1.  The most obvious




uptake of any of the metal ratios listed in Table 12 is Cr.  The ratio






                                   81

-------
of uptake (exposed/control) for this element is approximately 13.

There is no indication that equilibrium has been obtained for Cr during

this bioaccuraulation period of 28 days.  The control samples, however,

show no change for Cr content during the same time period.  All other

metals determined in the mussel samples tend to indicate minor amounts

of uptake.
                               Table 12
   Ratios of Trace Metal Accumulations in Exposed and Control Mussels

28-day control ± SD
Element
Fe
Mn
Zn
Cu
Pb
Cd
Cr
As
0-day control
1.1 ±
1.2 ±
1.5 ±
0.7 ±
1.4 ±
1.0 ±
0.9 ±
0.9 ±
0.1
0.7
0.9
0.6
0.6
0.2
0.2
0.1
28 day exposed ± SD
28 day control
2.4 ±
0.9 ±
1.5 ±
3.2 ±
2.1 ±
2.5 ±
12.8 ±
1.2 ±
0.9
0.6
0.6
1.4
1.1
0.8
6.4
0.2
       111. To determine if any relationships exist between any of the

metals determined for the homogenized mussel samples, linear least

square regression equations were calculated for all metals versus the

Fe concentration for each sample.  In the regression line calculations,

Fe was used as the dependent variable and the other metals were made
                                   82

-------
 the  independent variable.  The plots are shown in Figures 14 through




 20.  The number of sample pairs (i.e., mussel concentrations of x and




 y) must be  considered in order to evaluate the significance of the




 calculated  correlation coefficient.  In addition, the probability (P),




 which  indicates the possibility of a correlation coefficient being




 significant due to random sampling from an uncorrelated population,




 should also be considered.  Values of P of 0.10 and 0.01 indicate the




 possibility that 10% and 1%, respectively, of the time, a significant




 correlation of x to y may occur due to random errors.  All the correla-




 tion coefficients used in the following discussion are based on P




 values of 0.01 (i.e., 99% probability that a real correlation exists




 between x and y).  For example, 15 data pairs require a correlation




 coefficient greater that 0.641 to be at the 1% level of significance




 (Fisher 1958).  The x intercept of the regression line indicates how




much of the mean Fe mussel concentration of the dependent variable (x)




is not associated with the mean independent variable (y).  The slope




 of the line is in effect the relative mussel concentration of Fe asso-




ciated with the total of the other metals determined.  All of the data




 for all the samples are plotted in these figures.  The open circles




represent samples collected from the BRH exposure chamber and the solid




 circles represent mussel samples collected from the control chamber.




       112.  At the 1% level of significance Cr,  Pb, and Cd have a good




correlation with Fe.   The correlation coefficients for Fe versus Cr,




Pb, and Cd are 0.978, 0.940, and 0.860,  respectively.  The linear least




squares regression plots for Fe versus Cr,  Pb,  and Cd are given in




Figures 14, 15, and 16.   Qualitatively these three figures show the






                                   83

-------
relative increase of Cr,  Pb,  Cd,  and Fe  in BRH sediment-exposed mussels

compared to these same metals in  control mussel samples.  The equations

for these regression lines are given below:



           [Fe]  = 167 + 13.5  [Cr]

           [Fe]  - 32.5 + 32.3 [Pb]


           [Fe]  + 67.3 +  62.5 [Cd]



The predictive utility of the above regression equations are not certain

at this time.   However, it would be interesting to apply these equations

to metal concentrations determined in mussel samples collected from

Long Island Sound which are exposed to BRH sediment.
            30
         CL
        £ 20
            10
                • Control
                O BRH  Exposed
                         200      400       600

                               Fe (ppm)

          Figure  14.  Distribution of Cr versus Fe in mussels
                    from the Black Rock exposure
                                  84

-------
    16
 Q-  12
 Q.
.o
CL
    8
       • Control
      -O BRH Exposed
               200
   400
Fe  (ppm)
                                   600
Figure 15.  Distribution of Pb versus Fe in mussels
          from the Black Rock exposure
E
a.
a.
   8


   6

   4

   2
         Control
              Exposed
              200      400
                     Fe (ppm)
                                  600
Figure  16.  Distribution of Cd versus Fe in mussels
       from the Black Rock Harbor exposure
                       85

-------
       113.  The correlation  coefficients for Zn and Cu with Fe  are

close to the correlation coefficient required for a P value  of 0.01.

The correlation coefficients  for Fe versus Zn and Cu are 0.710 and

0.628, respectively.   The regression plots for these elements are shown

in Figures 17 and 18.   From Figure 17 it can be seen that there  is

almost no increase for the Zn concentration determined in mussels

collected from the exposure chamber versus the control chamber.  The

linear least squares regression equations for these plots are given

below:



           [Fe]  - 76.7 + 1.06 [Zn]

           [Fe]  = 171  + 3.16  [Cu]
       IM
           300
           200
            100
                  • Control
                  O BRH Exposed
                                                      o
                         200       400
                                Fe  (ppm)
600
          Figure  17.  Distribution of Zn versus Fe in mussels
                  from the Black Rock Harbor exposure
                                  86

-------
             90
          o
             30
                   • Control
                   OBRH Exposed
cP
                          200
  400
Fe (ppm)
600
          Figure 18.  Distribution of  Cu versus Fe in mussels
                  from the Black Rock  Harbor exposure
       114. Both As and Mn have  correlation coefficients that are below

the required value for a correlation at a P value of 0.01.  The correla-

tion coefficients for As and Mn  versus Fe are 0.589 and 0.132, respec-

tively.  The regression plots for  these elements are shown in Figures

19 and 20.  The plots of Mn and  As versus Fe demonstrate that these

two elements are of little value for showing BRH sediment uptake in

mussel test organisms.  The linear least squares regression equations

for these plots are given below:


           [FeJ = -349 + 82.8 [As]

           [Fe] = 290 + 1.89 [Mn]
                                  87

-------
  10
E
Q.
CL

in
       • Control
       O BRH  Exposed
              200
    400
Fe (ppm)
600
Figure 19.  Distribution of As versus Fe in mussels
        from the Black Rock. Harbor exposure
30
'e
1 20
c
2
10
Of
• Control ol
0 BRH Exposed I
/
* o
/o o
I o
1 1
200 400 600
Fe (ppm)
Figure 20.   Distribution of Mn  versus Fe in mussels
        from the Black. Rock Harbor exposure
                        88

-------
        115.  Several of  the elements showed an Increase in concentration




in the  first  7 days of  the uptake period.  Like the uptake of the




organic compounds determined in this study, the day 14 samples appeared




to resemble  a period of depuration for several of the elements measured.




A notable exception was Mn, which showed its highest concentration




during  the day 14 sampling period.  No explanation is easily formulated




for either this observed depuration for most of the metals determined




or the  erratic uptake behaviour of Mn during this sampling date.




        116. The fact that several of the elements have shown that an




uptake  plateau was not  reached during the study indicates that a longer




time period may be warranted to study the bioaccumulation of metals in




this marine organism.   A longer time period can have two beneficial




factors.  First, the amount of an element may increase in the test




organism to a level where it may be possible to determine interelemental




ratios  after subtracting control organism concentrations for the elements




in question.  With the  present data, the day 28 exposed organism concen-




trations are too close  to the control sample data to make reliable




subtractions in all cases except for Cr.  Second, a longer uptake




period would give a better evaluation of a long-term effect on the




organism.
                                   89

-------
                       Biological Characterization






Solid phase tests




        117.  Nephtys incisa.  In three solid phase tests with N. incisa




there were no mortalities due to Black Rock Harbor (BRH) sediment in 10




days (Tables 13, B1-B3).  No worms were seen out of their burrows on




the sediment surface in any treatment.  There was a slight difference




in the  burrow depth in the different treatments.  The depth of the




burrows decreased as the percentage of BRH sediment increased.  For




example, in one experiment (Table Bl) the deepest burrow was 1.8 cm in




the 25% BRH treatment but only 0.6 cm in the 100% BRH treatment, and




the estimated average burrow depths in those treatments were 1.2 and




0.4 cm, respectively.  The difference in the burrowing depth in the




sediment indicates that the worms are behaving somewhat differently in




the BRH sediment than in the REF sediment, but this parameter is not




particularly useful in short-term sediment characterization tests




because we do not know what a difference in burrow depth means.  At




best it can be used as a signal to indicate that there may be some




effect in these treatments in longer term experiments.




        118.  Neanthes arenaceodentata.  In three solid phase tests with




N. arenaceodentata (two with adult males and one with juveniles) there




were no mortalities due to the BRH sediments (Table 13).  Control




mortality was 0% in both tests with adults and 5% in the one test with




juveniles (Tables B6-B8).  In the tests with adults, one worm from the




100% BRH and one from the 75% BRH treatments came to the surface of




the sediment on day 3 and remained there for the rest of the test.
                                   90

-------
                                                    Table 13
                    Toxlclty of Solid Phase Black Rock Harbor (Connecticut) Dredged Material
                                to 11 Species of Marine Invertebrates and Fishes
    Species
Annelids
  Nephtys
    incisa

  Heanthes
    arenaceodentata

Molluscs
  Yoldia limatula
  Mulinia lateralis
Arthropods
Test Duration
    days	


     10


     10
     10
     10
                                                 LC50*
                                                  or
                                                 NOEC**
NOEC - 100Z BRH
NOEC - 100Z BRH
NOEC - 66Z BRH
NOEC - 100Z BRH
                                 Behavioral or
                                 Other Effects
                           Indication of decrease in
                           burrow depth with BRH mat
Burrowing impaired at 50Z
BRH.  No feeding at any
   BRH mixture

           none
Mysidopsis bahia
Ampellsca abdlta
Fishes
Menldia menidla
Cyprinodon variegatus
Ammodytes americanus
embryo
larvae
Paralichthys
dentatus
Pseudopleuronectes
americanus

4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
4
NOEC • 100Z BRH
LC50 - 27.2 and 29.8Z
NOEC - 100Z BRH
NOEC - 100Z BRH
NOEC - 100Z BRH
Inconclusive
not definitive
Inconclusive
NOEC - 100Z BRH
Inconclusive
none
Tube building impaired
BRH cone including
none
none
none
none
in all
12.5Z
*LC50 - concentration lethal to an estimated 50% of  the  test  organisms.
**NOEC » no observed effect concentration;  effect noted  is mortality.
                                                  91

-------
These two worms appeared normal otherwise.  None of the juveniles




appeared on the surface of the sediment except to search for food.




Because control mortality was 0% in both types of test chambers (indi-




vidual cups and crystallizing dishes), adult If. arenaceodentata do not




have to be exposed in individual cups, if they are given enough sedi-




ment and are not crowded even though these worms are cannibalistic.




Future tests with N. arenaceodentata will be conducted in the crystal-




lizing dishes.




       119.  Yoldia lima tula.  In a preliminary test, Y_. lima tula were




exposed to 25 and 50% BRH sediment and experienced no significant mor-




tality over a 10-day period (Table 13).  However, the ability to




burrow into these sediments was impaired (Table 14).  These results




indicated that a true 10-day exposure was not produced, so a second




solid phase test was conducted in which, after day 2, the Yoldia in




all treatments were gently pushed into the sediment, the posterior end




down.  The animals then burrowed deeper into the sediment.  The concen-




trations of BRH sediment and percent mortalities for this test were




as follows: 0% BRH, 0% mortality; 33% BRH, 2.5% mortality; 66% BRH,




7.5% mortality; and 100% BRH, 35% mortality (Table Bll).  Even though




exposure times for the two tests are not comparable, neither produced




significant mortalities at or below 66% BRH.  The 35% mortality at




100% BRH was statistically significant (Chi-square, P<0.05).
                                   92

-------
                                                             Table 14
                                    Percent of Yoldia not Burrowed into Sediment Over Time for
10
OJ


Treatment Day 1
Solid Phase 1
Re f erence 1.6
25% BRH 45
50% BRH 63.3
Suspended 1
REF Susp/REF Solid 7.5
REF Susp/50% BRH 35
BRH Susp/REF 55
BRH Susp/50% BRH 72.5
Solid Phase Test No. 1 and Suspended Phase Test No. 1

Percent Not Burrowed
2 34567 89

0 00000 00
36,7 26.7 15 11.7 10 13.3 6.7 5
51.7 41.7 33.3 23.3 18.3 15 13.3 11.7

0 00000 00
10 10 5 0 5 0 2.5 0
22.5 17.5 12.5 000 00
40 25 20 10 7.5 5 5 2.5

Day 10
Number Dead/
10 Number Exposed

0 0/61
5 0/60
8.3 1/60

0 0/40
0 3/40
0 0/40
2.5 1/40

-------
       120.  In addition to the effects on burrowing, the BRH sediment




inhibited Yoldia feeding.  This bivalve is a subsurface deposit feeder




which expels unused sediment and feces at the sediment-water interface,




creating a mound of sediment on the surface.  These mounds were very




apparent in all control (REF) treatments.  In all solid phase BRH expo-




sures, no feeding mounds were seen.  Consequently, long-term exposure




may be expected to produce effects on the growth potential of this




bivalve.




       121.  Mulinia lateralis.  There were no lethal or behavioral




effects of BRH sediment on  M. lateral!s (Tables 13, B13, and B14).




       122.  Mysidopsis bahia.  The arthropod M. bahia showed no acute




effects following a 96-hr exposure to 100% BRH or REF sediment.  The




first test, using exposure cups with screen sides, was monitored daily




for mortality by removing and replacing each cup.  This process stirred




up the sediment and created a heavy suspension of particles which made




it very difficult to see the test organisms and also created a suspended




particulate as well as a solid phase test.  Although an LC50 for this




test could not be calculated, there was an apparent dose-related




response (Table B16).




       123.  In order to expose the test species to the solid phase only,




the second and third tests were not checked until day 4.  The cups,




therefore, remained undisturbed and no particulate matter was suspended.




There was no 96-hr LCSO with either of these tests and no dose-related




response (Tables 13 and B16-B18).
                                   94

-------
       124.  Dissolved oxygen in these tests was not affected by the




sediment, and temperature and salinity were within acceptable limits




(Tables 2 and B16-B18).




       125.  Ampelisca abdita.  Table 15 shows 96-hr mortality as a




result of exposures to BRH sediments ranging from 50 to 12.5% mixtures,




with both local (from the Narrow River, R.I. (NR} , local collection




site) sediment and REF sediment as controls.  Bioassay methods using




Ampelisca require use of a local sediment for control treatments.




These tests, for each population, are shown in Table 15 for comparison




with the REF sediment.  The Long Island (LI) Ampelisca are more sensi-




tive to BRH mixed with local Long Island Sound sediment, than with REF




sediment.  The NR Ampelisca experienced no differences in BRH-induced




mortality when exposed to either REF or NR control sediments from




either REF or NR.  There was 100% mortality for Narrow River amphipods




to 100% BRH sediment in these and all other preliminary tests.  There




was some variability in the quantitative dose response for the six




tests.  In all cases, however, 25% BRH produced statistically signif-




icant mortalities (chi-square, P<0.05).  The ability to build tubes




was impaired at all BRH exposures and histological analysis showed




tissue damage in the tube-building glands (P.P. Yevich, ERL-N, Personal




Communication).
                                   95

-------
                                                   Table  15
              Summary of  Response  Percent Mortality of Ampelisca  abdita after  96-hr  Exposure  in
Solid Phase Tests with Black Rock Harbor Sediment *

Popula-
tion
LI
LI
NR
NR
NR
NR

Mean
size
mm
6.51
4.84
5.53
5.67
5.34
6.80

N
per
cone.
40
40
30
30
80
40






Percent Black Rock
Harbor Sediment
Control
Sediment
REF
LI
REF
REF
NR
REF
Test #
1
2
3
4
5
6
50%
33.0
74.8
83.3
80.0
84.8
61.0
25% 12.5%
25.0
56.1
63.3
63.3
45.0 4.0
49.1 30.6
Control
7.5
10.9
3.3
0.0
1.8
11,6
LC50
% BRH




27.16
29.8
* Amphipods were collected-from Narrow River (NR) and Long Island  Sound (LI).   Control  sediments  for
    Black Rock Harbor mixtures were collected from Narrow River (NR),  Long  Island  Sound (LI),  and
    Reference Station South (REF).

-------
        126.  Menidia menidia.  Larvae of M. menidia showed no acute




effects  following  a 96-hr exposure to 100% BRH or REF sediment.  No




mortality occurred in  any treatment  (SW control;  100% REF; 100% BRH)




for either of the  two  tests conducted using the solid phase test regime




(Tables  B29 and B30).  No obvious behavioral changes were observed in




swimming behavior  at the end of the  test period, and all fish appeared




to be feeding on the brine shrimp supplied.  Dissolved oxygen concen-




trations were close to saturation for all treatments.




       127.  Cyprinodon variegatus.  Larvae of £. variegatus appeared




to be unaffected by the solid phase of either REF or BRH.  A single




mortality occurred in  one seawater control of the first test (Table




B33),  Dissolved oxygen was at or above saturation.  Mortality in the




control appeared to be the result of gas supersaturation.  In the




second test, the dissolved oxygen was close to saturation in all treat-




ments (Table B34).




       128.  Ammodytes americanus.  Embryos of A_. americanus appeared




to be unaffected by the solid phases of both REF and BRH.  Mortalities




occurred, but not  in response to dose (Tables B37 and B38).




       129.  Ammodytes americanus larval solid phase tests showed high




mortality at 100%  BRH when three treatments (SW, REF, and 100% BRH)




were used (Tables  B39 and B40).  A chi-square test showed significant




differences between mortalities in the 100% REF and 100% BRH (P<0.01).




Subsequent testing with six treatments showed high control mortality




(100%  REF) as well as high mortality across the BRH treatments (Tables




B41-B44).  These tests generally  showed  higher  mortality at higher
                                   97

-------
concentrations of BRH sediment, but  test and probit analysis (Finney




1971) results were inconclusive.




        130.  Ammodytes americanus has not been used extensively in labo-




ratory  tests and the high mortality  in these tests can probably be




attributed to handling stress.  Further testing of this species is




required to find the optimum method  of handling, the optimum age for




testing, and the most suitable bioassay chamber to minimize control




mortality.  Dissolved oxygen measurements were taken only once during




all the solid phase tests.  Dissolved oxygen was assumed to be at




saturation, but the measurements taken at the time of the last test




(Table  B44) were below saturation, and could have contributed to the




high mortality observed during these tests.




        131.  Paralichthys dentatus.  The fish P_. dentata appeared to be




unaffected by the presence of either REF or BRH in the solid phase.




Control and REF mortalities were within accepted ASTM limits «10%)




for both tests.  Dissolved oxygen was at or near saturation in all the




exposure chambers (Tables B47 and B48).




        132.  Pseudopleuronectes americanus.  The results of the solid




phase tests with winter flounder larvae were not conclusive.  In test




1 there was significantly (chi-square test, P<0.05) higher mortality




in REF  than there was in BRH.  In the second test there was significantly




(chi-square test, P<0.05) higher mortality in BRH than there was in




REF.  In both tests there was a tendency for the larvae in the exposure




chambers containing both REF and BRH sediment to stay in the water




column more of the time than the larvae in the seawater controls.   The
                                   98

-------
dissolved oxygen concentration was at or near saturation in all treat-




ments in both tests (Tables B49 and B50).






Suspended particulate tests




       133.  Nephtys incisa. In two suspended particulate tests with




Nephtys iricisa no toxic effect was seen (Table B4 and B5).  Mortality




was 5% or less in all treatments.  During the test, no worms appeared on




the sediment surface.  There were no differences in the estimated average




depth of burrows in the various treatments (Table 16).




       134.  In two earlier suspended particulate tests with _N. incisa a




toxic effect (25 and 20% mortality) was seen in the 25 mg/L BRH sus-




pended particulate, 100% BRH solid phase treatment.  However, in a




review of the procedures for these two tests, we discovered that we




had not turned off the inflow water when we added the worms to the treat-




ment dishes.  When we repeated the tests (above), we saw no toxic effects




in any treatments.  We concluded that the "mortalities" in the first two




tests were not real and probably resulted from the worms not burrowing




into the sediment in the beginning of the test.  Therefore, it is impor-




tant that the procedures outlined in the methods section be followed




carefully to avoid this problem.




       135.  Neanthes arenaceodenta.  In the suspended particulate tests with




,N. arenaceodentata, no toxic effect was seen in any treatment (mortality




10% or less, Table B9a and B9b).  No worms appeared on the surface in any




treatments except to search for food (a normal activity).
                                    99

-------
                                                                 Table 16
                           Toxicity of Black Rock Harbor (Connecticut) Dredged Material, as Suspended Sediment,
                                             to  10 Species of Marine Invertebrates and Fishes
o
o
              Species
             Annelids
               Nephtys
                 incisa

               Neanthes
                 arenaceodentata

             Molluscs
               Yoldia limatula
                Mulinia lateral!s
Arthropods
  Mysidopsis bahia
                Ampelisca  abdita

              Fishes
                Menidia menidia
                Cyprinodon variegatus
                Ammodytes  americanus

                Pseudopleuronectes
                  americanus
                           Test Duration
                               days	


                                10


                                10
                                10
                                10
                                 4

                                 4
        LC50*
         or
        NOEO*
NOEC = 100% solid and
  25 mg/L suspended BRH material

NOEC = 100% solid and 25 mg/L
  suspended BRH material


NOEC = 100% solid and 40 mg/L
  suspended BRH material

NOEC = 100% solid and 40 mg/L
  suspended BRH material


NOEC = 100% solid and 25 mg/L
  suspended BRH material

NOEC - 0% solid and 20 mg/L
  suspended BRH material

NOEC = 100% solid and 25 mg/L
  suspended BRH material

NOEC - 100% solid and 25 mg/L
  suspended BRH material

      Not definitive

NOEC = 100% solid and 25 mg/L
  suspended BRH material
  Behavioral or
  Other Effects
       None
       None
No burrowing in 50%
BRH solid phase mat

       None
                                                                                                       None
                                                                                         None
                                                                                         None
                                                                                         None
       None
              *LC50  = concentration lethal to an estimated 50% of the test organisms.
              **NOEC = no observed effect concentration, effect noted is mortality.

-------
       136.  Yoldia limatula.  There were no mortalities with Ypldia




exposed to 40 mg/L BRH suspension with either REF or 50% BRH sediment




as a solid phase (Tables BIO to B12).  In the treatments with 50% BRH




as a solid phase, the same nonburrowing response that was noted in the




solid phase tests was seen.




       137.  Mulinia lateralis.  Mulinia experienced no mortalities when




exposed to 40 mg/L BRH suspended participates with 100% BRH in the solid




phase (Tables B13 to B15).




       138.  Mysidopsis bahia.  The arthropod M. bahia showed no acute




effects from a 96-hr exposure to 25 mg/L BRH or REF participate.  The




two 96-hr tests for the particulate phase were conducted at 21°C rather




than 25°C as in the solid phase tests, however; the lower temperature




had no effect on the survival of the test species.




       139.  In the first test, the control was without reference sedi-




ment; in the second test the control contained reference sediment.




No difference in mortality occurred between either of these two treat-




ments or between particulate phase controls and the controls from the




solid phase tests.




       140.  The levels of exposure for the particulate phase tests were




representative of the worst case situation with the highest level of




BRH particulate load (25 mg/L) and 100% BRH sediment compared to the




identical condition with reference particulate and sediment.  Neither




test showed any effect on survival at 96 hours (Tables 16, B19, and




B20).
                                  101

-------
       141.  Dissolved oxygen, temperature, and salinity remained within




acceptable limits throughout the tests (Tables 2, B19, and B20),  Elec-




tronic particle counts showed consistency tor particle density in the




splitters, exposure chambers, and test chambers.




       142.  Ampelisca abdita.  The species A_. abdita experienced no sig-




nificant mortalities when exposed to 20 mg/L BRH at 20°C (Table B27)




or when exposed to 25 mg/L BRH at 8°C (Table B28).  In both cases, a




no-effect level of 0% BRH was used in the solid phase (Table 16).




       143.  Menidia menidia.  Larvae of bl. menidia showed no significant




acute effects following a 96-hr exposure to suspended particulates of




BRH or REF sediment (Table 16).  A single mortality occurred in one SW




control dish (Table B31).  Although it was difficult to observe fish




swimming in the REF and BRH exposure dishes, it could be discerned




during daily counts that fish were feeding on the brine shrimp ration.




Larvae appeared to be swimming normally at the termination of these




experiments.  Dissolved oxygen was close to saturation for all treat-




ments.




       144.  Cyprinodon variegatus.  The fish C_. variegatus appeared to




be unaffected by exposure to either the BRH or the REF 'sediments in




suspended phase at the nominal concentration of 25 mg/L (Table 16).




There were no mortalities in any of the treatments in either test, and




the behavior of the larvae appeared to be unaffected by the suspended




sediment.  Dissolved oxygen was close to saturation in all treatments




(Tables B35 and B36).
                                  102

-------
        145.  Ammodytes americanus.  Suspended sediment test results for




A.  americanus were inconclusive as to the effect of the suspensions of



100% REF or BRH on the larvae (Tables B45 and B46).




        146.  Psuedopleuronectes americanus^  Larvae of P. americanus did




not appear to be adversely affected by the presence of suspended REF or




BRH at  the nominal concentration of 25 mg/L (Table 16).  In the first




test there were only two mortalities, one in the seawater control  and




one in BRH (Tables B51 and B52).  In the second test, there were some




mortalities in all of the treatments (5 out of 24 in the seawater con-




trol, 5 out of 19 in REF, and 4 out of 22 in BRH), but there was no




significant difference between the REF and the BRH in either test.




Dissolved oxygen was at or near saturation in all exposure dishes




during both tests.  As in the solid phase tests with the P. americanus,




there was more of a tendency for the larvae to stay in the water column




in  the exposure chambers containing sediment than in those containing




no sediment.
                                  103

-------
                PART VI:  CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS









       147.  Black Rock Harbor dredged material contained substantial




concentrations of both organic and inorganic contaminants that were




biologically available to the blue mussel Mytilus edulis in a suspended




particulate bioaccumulation study.  PCB's were present in the sediment




at 6800 ng/g (ppb), while PAH's of molecular weights between 128 and




302 were present at concentrations between 17 and 9100 ng/g.  Alkyl




homologs of the PAH's of molecular weights between 128 and 252 were




also present in the sediment at concentrations between 110 and 13000




ng/g, measured as the sum of alkyl homologs between C-l and C-4.  Of




the organic contaminants present in the sediment, mussels accumulated




PCB's to a tissue concentration of 3000 ng/g, which is 44% of the con-




centration in the sediment.  PAH's of molecular weights 202, 228, and




252 were accumulated to tissue concentrations between 1600 and 2000 ng/g,




which are between 18 and 28% of the concentrations in the sediment.  Other




PAH's were accumulated to lesser extents.  Alkyl homologs of the PAH's




were also accumulated, with a maximum tissue concentration of 5000 ng/g




for the 178 alkyl homologs, which is 38% of the sediment concentration.




Other alkyl homologs from molecular weight PAH's of 166 through 228 were




accumulated to levels between 110 and 3400 ng/g;  these tissue concentra-




tions are between 14 and 41% of the sediment concentration.  Although




these concentrations of contaminants accumulated in mussels were after a




28 day exposure,  the concentrations in the mussels after only 7 days were




close to the same concentrations for many of the contaminants.
                                  104

-------
        148.   Inorganic contaminants were also present in Black Rock




Harbor  sediment, but an interference precluded the measurement of As.




With  the exception of Mn, Zn, As, and Hg, which were below the limit




of detection, all other trace metals showed statistically significant




(P<.05) increases over controls during the 28 day mussel uptake study.




The greatest uptake was for Cr, which reached a concentration of 25 yg/g




at the  end of the bioaccuraulation compared to a control concentration




of 1.96 yg/g.  Other trace metals were taken up to a lesser degree,




including Cd which reached a concentration of 7 pg/g compared to a




control value of 2.8 yg/g.  Compared to the sediment concentration,




the organisms accumulated to only 2% of the Cr, but 28% of the Cd




sediment concentration values.




        149.  In contrast to the organic contaminants which reached high




concentrations relatively early in the bioaccumulation study, many trace




metals  had not reached plateau concentrations by the end of the 28-day




study.  Therefore, although many organic contaminants should be detected




in a  shorter test, significant accumulation from inorganic contaminants




could be overlooked.



        150.  Black Rock Harbor material as solid phase or in combination




with the suspended particulate phase was acutely lethal to one of the




eleven  species tested and caused behavioral changes in two species.




Only with Ampelisca abdita was the material sufficiently toxic to pro-




duce 96-hr LC50 values (27.2 and 28.2% BRH, solid phase; Tables B25




and B26).  In addition, the amphipod's tube building was impaired in




all BRH concentration down to 12.5%, the lowest concentration tested.
                                  105

-------
Yoldia limatula failed to burrow into sediment containing 25% BRH or




higher and did not feed even when gently pushed into the sediments.




       151.  All species except Ammodytes americanus proved suitable




for testing dredged material in this study.   As stated earlier, .A.




americanus has never before (to our knowledge) been used in aquatic




toxicology and much must be learned in the handling and culture of the




species before acceptable control survival «10%; ASTM 1980b) can be




attained.  A strong effort will continue in developing the species for




toxicity testing because it is an important link in marine food chains




in coastal waters of the northeastern United States (Sherman et al.




1981) and may be impacted by dredged material disposal.




       152.  Three of the five infaunal species tested (A. abdita, N.




incisa, and Y_. lima tula) were sensitive to BRH material in acute tests,




whereas no epibenthic or water column species showed sensitivity to




the material either in solid phase or in combination with the suspended




participate phase.  For the affected species, the most important factor




was the concentration (or presence) of BRH solid phase material.




Without further data from long-term tests, including measurements of




energetics, histopathology, etc., one can only speculate on the reason




for the differing sensitivities, but it may be related to whether or




not the BRH solid phase material is in contact with the species.  For




example, larval A. americanus and VL. menidia seldom directly contact




the benthos.  Conversely, infaunal species such as If. lima tula and A_.




abdita are in intimate contact with the sediment, and thus the toxic




properties of the BRH material are available by direct contact or by
                                  106

-------
ingestion.  Longer  term exposures and more detailed studies may reveal




the factors causing the different sensitivities.




        153.  The reproducibility of  the effects observed in the solid




phase and in combination with the suspended particulate phase for the




species  tested was very good.  No significant differences were observed




in replicate solid phase tests with JN. incisa, N. arenaceodentata, M.




lateralis, JM. bahia, A. abdita, M. menidia, ^. variegatus, P_. dentata,




and P^. americanus.  As stated earlier, further research is needed with




A_. americanus to obtain the necessary control survival and test repro-




ducibility; Y_. limatula tests were not precisely replicated (Tables




BIO and Bll), but the mortality observed in the two tests was corre-




lated well with BRH concentration.




       154.  Replicates from suspended particulate tests, like the solid




phase replicates, showed excellent reproducibility.  No significant




differences in results of the replicates were observed in N. incisa,




M^ lateralis, M^  bahia, M. menidia, CL variegatus, and JP. americanus.




Suspended particulate test results obviously depended upon the reli-




ability of the dosing system.  Once the initial problems were solved,




the microprocessor, transmissometer, and dosing valve system worked




well.  Generally, the particulate concentration was maintained within




10% of the desired values.
                                  107

-------
                                  REFERENCES
American Public Health Association.  1976.  Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater, 14th ed., Washington, DC.
American Society for Testing and Materials.  1980a.  "Proposed Standard
Practice for Conducting Bioconcentration Tests with Fishes and Saltwater
Bivalve Molluscs," Draft 5, Philadelphia, Pa.
	.  1980b.  "Standard Practice for Conducting Acute Toxicity
Tests with Fishes, Macroinvertebrates, and Amphibians," ASTM E-729-80,
Philadelphia, Pa.
Boehm, P.D. and J.G. Quinn.  1977.  "The Persistence of Chronically
Accumulated Hydrocarbons in the Hard Shell Clam Mercenaria mercenaria,'
Marine Biology, Vol 44, pp 227-233.
Davey, E.W., J.H. Gentile, S.J. Erickson, and P. Betzer.  1979.
"Removal of Trace Metals from Marine Culture Media," Limnol.  Oceanogr.
15: 486-488.
Environmental Protection Agency.  1979.  "Methods for Chemical Analysis
of Water and Wastes,"  U.S. Environmental Monitoring and Support Labo-
ratory, Office of Research and Development, EPA/600-4-79-020.
Finney, D.J.  1971.  Probit Analysis, Cambridge University Press,
Great Britain.
Fisher, R.A.  1958.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers,
New York, Hafner Publ. Co. Inc.
Gentile, S.M., J. H. Gentile, J. Walker, and J.F. Heltshe.  1982.
"Chronic Effects of Cadmium on Two Species of Mysid Shrimp: Mysidopsis
bahia and Mysidopsis bigelowi," Hydrobiologia, Vol 93, pp 195-204.
Hansen, D.J., Parrish, P.R., Schimmel, S.C. and Goodman, L.R.  1978.
"Life-Cycle Toxicity Tests Using Sheepshead Minnows (Cyprinodon
variegatus)." In:  "Bioassay Procedures for Ocean Disposal Permit
Program."  United States Environmental Protection Agency, National
Environmental Research Center Ecological Research Series,
EPA-600/9-78/010:109-117, Environmental Research Laboratory,
Gulf Breeze, Florida.

                                  108

-------
Hatch, W.R. and W.L. Ott.  1968.  "Determination of Sub-Microgram
Quantities of Mercury by Atomic Absorption Spectrocopy,"  Anal. Chem.
40: 2085.

Klein-MacPhee, G., Howell, W.H., and Beck, A.D.  1982.  "Comparison of
a Reference Strain and Four Geographical Strains of Artemia as Food
for Winter Flounder (Pseudopleuronectes americanus) Larvae,"
Aquaculture, Vol 29, pp 279-288.
Klein-MacPhee, G.  1981.  "Effects of Stocking Density on Survival of
Laboratory Cultured Summer Flounder (Paralichthys dentatus) Larvae,"
Rapports  et  Procee  Verbeux  Reunion  de  Conseil International de
Exploration de Her, Vol 178, pp 505-506.
Lake, J.L. , Norwood, C.B., Dimock, C. and Bowen, R.  1979.  "Origins
of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Estuarine Sediments," Geochimica
et Cosmochimica Acta, Vol 43, pp 1847-1853.
Lake, J.L., Rogerson, P.P., and Norwood, C.B.  1981.  "A Polychlorlnated
Dibenzofuran and Related Compounds in an Estuarine Ecosystem,"
Environmental Science and Technology, Vol 15, pp 549-553.
Middaugh, D.P. and Takita, T.  1983.  "Tidal and Diurnal Spawning Cues
in the Atlantic Silverside, Menidia menidia," Environmental Biology
of Fish, Vol 8, No. 2, pp 97-104.
Mount, D.L. , and Brungs, W.A.  1967.  "A Simplified Dosing Apparatus
for Fish Toxicological Studies," Water Research, Vol 1, pp 21-29.
Pesch, C.E. and Morgan, D.  1978.  "Influence of Sediment in Copper
Toxicity Test With the Polychaete Neanthes arenaceodentata," Water
Research, Vol 12, pp 747-751.


Phelps, D.K. , arid W.B. Galloway.  1980.  "A Report on the Coastal
Environmental Assessment Stations (CEAS) Program."  In;  Rapp. P. -v.
Reun. Cons. Int. Explor. Mer. 179; pp. 76-81.


Phelps, D.K., Galloway, W.B., Reynolds, B.H., Nelson, W.G.,  Hoffman,
G.L. , Lake, J.L. , Barszcz, C., Thurberg, P.P., Kraikowski, J., and
K. Jenkins.  1983.  "Evaluation Report:  Use of Caged Mussel Transplants
for Monitoring Fate and Effects of Ocean Disposal in the New York Bight
Apex," Prepared for the Office of Regulations and Standards, ERLN
Contribution No. 586.
                                  109

-------
Sherman, K., Jones, C., Sullivan, L., Smith, W., Berrier, P. and
Ejsymont, L.  1981.  "Congruent Shifts in Sand Eel Abundance in Western
and Eastern North Atlantic Ecosystems," Nature, Vol 291, pp 486-489.
Sinnett, J.C. and Davis, W.R.  1983.  "A Programmable Turbidistat for
Suspended Particles in Laboratory Aquaria," Journal of Experimental
Marine Biology and Ecology, In Press.       ~~
Smigielski, A.S. and Arnold, C.R.  1972.  "Separating and Incubating
Winter Flounder Eggs," Progressive Fish Culturist, Vol 34, pp 118.
Sorgeloos, P.  1980.  "Availability of Reference Artemia Cysts," Marine
Ecology - Progress Series, Vol 3, pp 363-364.
Sosnowski, S.L. , Germond, D.J. , and Gentile, J.H.  1979.  "The Effect
of Nutrition on the Response of Field Populations of the Calanoid
Copepod Acartia tonsa to Copper," Water Research, Vol 13, pp 449-452.
Stegeman, J.J. and Teal, J.M.  1973.  "Accumulation,  Release and Reten-
tion of Petroleum Hydrocarbons by the Oyster, Crassostrea virginica,"
Marine Biology, Vol 22, pp 37-44.
                                  110

-------
                         APPENDIX A:  CHEMICAL DATA






     Appendix Tables A1-A7 list the concentration of each polynuclear




aromatic hydrocarbon and its alkylated homolog from C-l through C-4




for the three replicates of day 7, 14, and 28 and for the three repli-




cates of both the day 0 and day 28 controls.  Also given are the same




measurements for Black Rock Harbor sediment and for the analytical




blank associated with these analyses.




     Appendix Tables A8-A11 give complete metal concentration data for




all sediment and mussel samples.
                                   Al

-------
                       Table Al
Day 0 control concentrations of PAH and Aklyl Homologs
for replicates A, B, and





Concentration, ng/g
Compound
128


154Bi


154An


166


178


202


228


252


276


278


300


302


A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
PAH
1.2
0.5
0.8
1.6
1.3
1.1
0.9
0.3
1.0
1.8
1.1
1.3
9.1
6.1
6.5
42
27
34
9.7
5.9
10
17
11
18
4.0
2.7
3.2
<0.4
<0.2
<0.6
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.3
<0.5
<0.2
C-l
0.6
0.3
0.7
0.9
0.5
0.5
_
-
—
1.0
0.6
1.0
11
7.4
8.6
8.7
5.4
7.7
2.0
1.3
3.2
<6.6
6.3
<5.9












C-2
2.3
1.3
2.2
2.1
1.6
2.4
1.4
0.8
1.6
4.6
2.7
3.7
19
12
15
2.7
3.0
3.6
1.5
1.6
2.3
<0.7
<0.4
<0.2












C

Dry Weight
C-3
4.4
2.6
2.4
3.8
2.2
3.6
2.0
1.1
2.1
9.2
5.6
7.0
11
8.1
11
1.5
1.1
1.5
2.6
1.4
1.9
<0.3
<0.2
<0.1














C-4
4.4
1.8
2.8
4.5
2.9
4.2
0
-
—
3.2
2.4
2.4
3.2
3.3
3.4
0.6
0.6
0.4
_
-
—
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1












                         A2

-------
                       Table A2
Day 7 exposed concentrations of PAH and Alkyl Homologs
for replicates A, B, and C







Concentration, ng/g Dry Weight
Compound
128


154Bi


154An


166


17&


202


228


252


276


278


300


302


A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
PAH
0.4
0.5
0.6
1.5
1.6
2.5
2.9
4.4
3.6
14
13
15
190
240
220
230
3100
2300
1700
2100
1700
1200
1600
1200
220
330
210
120
170
130
9.4
14
9.0
57
81
60
C-l
0.5
0.6
0.5
6.8
7.0
7,4
15
23
19
72
71
66
930
1200
970
1600
2200
1600
830
1100
800
300
410
290












C-2
7.1
15
9.1
70
79
70
76
110
93
260
270
250
1900
2400
1800
950
1200
900
380
480
320
110
150
100












C-3
80
170
120
200
240
200
160
200
190
430
490
370
1500
2000
1400
490
640
460
140
180
110
36
53
39








'



C-4
190
330
250
380
490
280
_
-
-
340
370
260
870
1200
800
170
250
160
49
65
40
10
14
13












                          A3

-------
                        Table A3
Day 14 exposed concentrations of PAH and Alkyl Homologs
for replicates A, B, and C







Concentration, ng/g Dry Weight
Compound
128


154B1


154An


166


178


202


228


252


276


278


300


302


A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
b
C
A
B
C
PAH
0.8
1.0
1.4
2.3
2.4
4.1
3.4
5.3
5.5
6.8
8.8
9.3
120
160
150
930
1200
1200
660
950
910
490
680
650
97
140
110
52
85
67
2.1
3.8
2.7
12
22
16
C-l
0.5
1.3
1.6
2.6
4.6
3.9
18
-
—
33
52
44
390
530
480
630
850
840
340
520
490
140
190
150












C-2
8.4
16
16
28
43
40
42
63
63
100
150
130
720
1000
980
360
540
510
140
220
180
38
65
49












C-3
65
110
96
89
140
120
84
110
110
170
230
230
590
890
810
180
300
260
49
76
57
8.3
18
12












C-4
120
190
180
170
400
300
-
-
-*
120
200
160
300
540
440
80
99
72
16
29
20
<0.9
<4.0
<2.2












                           A4

-------
                        Table A4
Day 28 Exposed concentrations of PAH and Alkyl Homologs
for replicates A, ft, and C







Concentration, ng/g Dry Weight
Compound
128


154B1


154An


166


178


202


228


252


276


278


300


302


A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
PAH
0.5
0.4
1.0
2.8
1.8
5.8
3.8
2.0
5.6
13
7.9
15
210
140
180
2500
1600
1800
2200
1500
1700
1800
1400
1500
330
230
280
180
140
160
9.6
8.4
9.9
62
46
60
C-l
0.8
0.3
1.4
7.0
5.0
7.5
21
13
41
67
44
62
1000
650
730
1900
1300
1400
1300
970
1000
450
350
400
*











C-2
10
4.4
15
78
46
71
100
54
98
290
180
220
2300
1400
1400
1300
910
940
570
440
450
160
120
140












C-3
100
53
130
250
140
200
210
120
180
520
310
590
2100
1300
1300
750
550
560
200
140
170
47
31
45












C-4
250
130
220
620
300
430
_
-
-
420
270
290
1300
810
840
280
210
210
58
49
46
12
10
10












                          A5

-------
                        Table A5
Day 28 control concentrations of PAH and Alkyl Homologs
for replicates A, B, and C







Concentration, ng/g Dry Weight
Compound
128


154Bi


154An


166


178


202


228


252

276


278


300


302


A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
PAH
0.5
0.5
0.6
6.5
3.0
6.3
1.0
1.1
1.4
1.4
0.8
1.4
6.8
5.1
8.1
22
17
19
4.3
2.4
2.5
7.8
4.8
2.2
<1.0
0.9
<0.9
<0.3
0.6
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
C-l
0.6
0.6
0.7
3.6
1.8
3.4
_
-
-
2.6
1.7
2.4
14
12
15
5.3
3.3
4.4
1.9
1.0
0.9 '
<4.1
<3.0












C-2
2.3
1.6
2.5
5.5
5.5
4.6
3.6
3.4
4.0
7.6
6.0
7.5
16
11
14
3.1
1.3
1.1
<1.8
<0.8
<1.1
<0.5
<0.1












C-3
4.7
4.0
5.5
9.0
7.2
8.7
5.0
3.5
3.8
11
7.9
9.3
11
6.2
7.6
2.1
0.9
0.7
<1.4
<0.9
<1.4
<0.2
<0.1












C-4
9.5
7.6
9.6
12
9.0
12
_
-
—
6.6
2.5
4.1
4.9
2.5
3.3
0.5
<0.3
0.5
<5.5
<4.1
<7.0
<0.1
<0.1












                           A6

-------
                         Table A6
Analytical blank concentrations of PAH and Alkyl Homologs

Compound
128
154Bi
154An
166
178
202
228
252
276
278
300
302
of previous samples

Concentration, ng/g Dry Weight
PAH C-l C-2 C-3 C-4
0.6 0.3 <0.8 0.5 <0.4
0.7 <0.2 <0.3 <0.4 <0.3
0.6 - <0.1 <0.1
0.2 2.5 <0.3 <1.3 <0.1
0.6 0.5 <0.4 <0.3 <0.2
0.7 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
0.7 <0.1 <0.2 <1.0 <0.1
0.7 <2.4 <0.1 <0.1 <0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
<0.1
                            A7

-------
Table A7
concentrations in ng/g dry weight





Concentration, ng/g Dry Weight
Compound
128
154Bi
154An
166
178
202
228
252
276
278
300
302
PAH
17
54
120
370
2700
7100
9800
8600
9100
4400
130
2700
C-l
67
130
140
610
3500
3800
5400
2700




C-2 C-3
420 1200
520 760
420 500
930 1100
3900 3200
2200 1500
3900 2200
1500 580




C-4
1700
1500
-
790
2300
770
1200
-




    AS

-------
                       Table AS
Metal Concentrations for Black Rock Harbor Barrel 100.
All Sediment Samples were
Dissolved with Hot
Concentrated HNOq.
All Concentrations are in ug/g Dry Weight


TOP
1
2
3
AVE
SD
ZSD
MIDDLE
1
2
3
AVE
SD
%SD
BOTTOM
1
2
3 -
AVE
SD
ZSD
BARREL
AVE
SD
ZSD
BLANK

Fe

31000
28400
28900
29400
1130
3

30400
30100
29800
30100
244
1

29400
28700
30100
29400
571
1

29600
809
2
1 0.
BLANK 2 0.

Mn

403
369
303
326
52
16

326
417
384
375
37
10

348
371
408
375
24
6

359
37
10
90 0.025
84 0.014

Zn

1190
1090
1150
1130
41
3

1290
1280
1150
1240
63
5

1210
1200
1220
1210
8
1

1200
59
4
0.34
0.39

Cu

2350
2140
2390
2293
109
4

2480
2490
2270
2413
101
4

2410
2420
2520
2450
49
2

2385
112
4
0.25
0.34

Pb

384
346
365
365
15
4

403
383
364
383
15
4

381
380
400
387
9
2

378
16
4
0.14
0.17

Cd

24.5
23.5
23.8
23.9
0.4
1.8

23.2
24.1
22.2
23.2
0.8
3.4

23.8
21.7
23.9
23.1
1.0
4.4

23.4
0.9
3.7
0.056
0.056

Cr

1400
1260
1380
1346
61
4

1540
1460
1410
1470
53
3

1460
1460
1510
1476
23
1

1431
77
5
0.014
0.017

Ni

141
133
144
139
4
3

144
147
139
143
3
2

131
139
141
137
4
3

139
4
3
0.20
0.56

Hg

1.8
1.6
1.7
1.7
0.1
7.0

1.7
1.7
1.6
1.7
0.1
4.0

1.7
1.7
1.8
1.7
0.1
1.0

1.7
0.1
4.0
<0.01
<0.01
                              A9

-------
                       Table A9
Metal Concentrations for Black Rock Harbor Barrel #LL.
All Sediment Samples were Eluted with 5Z HNO^.
All Concentrations are Given in ug/g Dry Weight


TOP
1
2
3
AVE
SD
%SD
MIDDLE
1
2
3
AVE
SD
%SD
BOTTOM
1
2
3
AVE
SD
%SD
BARREL
AVE
SD
%SD
BLANK
BLANK

Fe

26400
26500
27200
26700
355
1

26300
28000
26700
27000
712
2

26100
26200
25800
26000
169
1

26600
623
2
1 1.9
2 1.3

Mn

284
278
284
282
2
1

274
280
286
280
4
1

269
272
278
273
3
1

278
5
1
0.07
0.03

Zn

1290
1210
1240
1250
33
2

1180
1282
1244
1240
42
3

1150
1180
1150
1160
14
1

1210
50
4
1.
0.

Cu

2560
2510
2650
2570
57
2

2500
2670
2510
2560
77
3

2530
2490
2490
2500
18
1

2540
64
2
19 1.03
32 0.71

Pb

421
431
427
426
4
1

436
4.16
377
409
24
5

393
397
425
405
14
3

413
18
4
0.
0.

Cd

25.4
24.8
25.7
25.3
0.4
1.5

24.0
25.6
24.1
24.6
0.7
3.0

23.5
24.4
24.9
24.3
0.6
2.4

24.7
0.7
2.9
055 0.032
063 0.048

Cr

1380
1350
1350
1360
14
1

1330
1380
1360
1360
20
1

1350
1280
1310
1310
28
' 2

1340
30
2
0.048
0.024

Nl

172
166
168
168
2
1

168
184
170
174
7
4

164
164
167
165
1
1

169
5
3
0.79
0.95
                           A10

-------
                     Table A10
Metal Concentrations Determined for Mytilus edulis
Control Samples and Black Rock
Harbor Exposed Samples.
All Concentrations in ug/gram Dry Weight

SAMPLE
DAY 1
7 2
3
AVE
SD
%SD
DAY 1
14 2
3
AVE
SD
%SD
DAY 1
28 2
3
AVE
SD
ZSD

Fe
404
334
332
357
41
11
322
333
333
329
6
2
715
348
437
500
191
38

Mn
15.6
9.5
11.3
12.1
3.2
25
19.7
38.9
24.9
31.1
10.1
32
16.8
7.6
9.2
11.2
4.9
44

Zn
350
236
272
286
58
20
176
163
142
160
17
11
386
236
376
333
84
25

Cu
81.3
68.6
36.3
62.0
23.2
37
68.6
73.6
83.3
75.2
7.4
10
74.9
39.9
50.2
55.0
18.0
33

Pb
11.9
11.2
8.9
10.7
1.5
14
9.50
8.20
7.87
8.52
0.86
10
19.0
9.8
13.0
13.9
4.7
34

Cd
5.37
4.71
4.00
4.69
0.69
15
3.67
2.73
2.93
3.11
0.49
16
8.09
4.72
8.09
6.97
1.94
28

Cr
17.2
14.6
14.2
15.3
1.6
10
13.3
10.8
12.0
12.0
1.3
10
36.4
15.1
23.6
25.1
10.7
43

As
9.37
7.43
8.95
8.58
1.02
12
6.94
7.33
7.67
9.31
0.37
5
9.86
7.76
9.00
8.87
1.06
12
                    (continued)
                          All

-------
                               Table AID (Cont'd)
CONTROL SAMPLES
SAMPLE
DAY 1
0 2
3
AVE
SD
%SD
DAY 1
28 2
3
AVE
SD
%SD
Fe
189
178
229
199
26
13
220
212
206
213
7
3
Mn
11.4
10.4
11.6
11.1
0.7
6
9.3
8.1
21.0
12.8
7.1
55
Zn
70
154
223
149
76
51
289
164
210
221
63
29
Cu
51.8
10.1
14.2
25.4
23.0
91
20.9
19.7
11.8
17.4
5.0
28
Pb
4.73
4.85
4.57
4.72
0.14
3
9.42
5.81
4.40
6.54
2.59
40
Cd
3.09
2.54
2.50
2.71
0.32
12
3.32
2.69
2.35
2.79
0.49
18
Cr
2.64
2.08
2.07
2.26
0.32
14
2.53
1.81
1.55
1.96
0.50
26
As
7.45
8.62
8.50
8.19
0.64
8
7.37
8.38
6.45
7.40
0.96
13
                                 BLANK SAMPLES




AVE          <1.9    <0.06     <0.6    >0.3     <0.06   <0.01     <0.06   <0.2
                                        A12

-------
                      Table All




Percent Recovery of Metals Spiked Into Mussel Samples
Element
Fe
Zn
Mn
Cu
Pb
Cd
Cr
As
yg Added
15.0
62.5
25.0
37.5
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
1.25
2.50
0.625
0.625
2.50
2.50
2.50
2.50
yg Found
14.5
59.8
25.2
38.5
2.66
2.95
2.31
2.38
1.07
2.34
0.630
0.66U
2.43
2.44
2.28
2.17
% Recovery
96.7
95.6
101
103
106
118
92.4
95.2
85.6
93.6
101
106
97.2
97.6
91.2
86.8
                         A13

-------