ENVIRONMENTAL PROTITTION \(,\\( Y
           OFFICE OF IMOKII;M
                  REPORT ON
      REMOTE SENSING MAJOR WATERWAYS
         MEMPHISJENNESSEE VICINITY
NATIONAL FIELD INVESTIGATIONS C E NTE R-DE N V E R

              DENVER.COLORADO
                 APRIL 1972

-------
       ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
            REMOTE SENSING REPORT

               MAJOR WATERWAYS
         MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE VICINITY
                 Prepared By

National Field Investigations Center - Denver
              Denver, Colorado

-------
                          REMOTE SENSING REPORT




                       MEMPHIS. TENNESSEE VICINITY




                              FEBRUARY 1972






INTRODUCTION




     In accordance with the Memphis study plan, an aerial  reconnaissance




mission was carried out over selected waterways in the Memphis,  Tennessee




vicinity on the 7th of January, 1972.  A Remote Sensing Report was issued




covering this mission.




     On 17 February 1972,  a second reconnaissance mission  was flown




over Memphis.  The timing  of this second mission coincided with  the field




operations of a ground survey team studying the five waterways constituting




the target area.  These waterways were as follows:




     (a)  Nonconnah Creek  - From a point approximately four miles




          east of the intersection of Mt. Moniah Road and  Inter-




          state 240 downstream of its outflow into McKellar Lake.




     (b)  Wolf River - From a point approximately true north of  Collier-




          ville, Tennessee, to its confluence with the Mississippi River.




     (c)  Loosahatchie River - From a point approximately  due south of




          Millington, Tennessee, to its confluence with the Mississippi




          River.




     (d)  McKellar Lake -  In its entirety.




     (e)  Mississippi River - From a point adjacent to Beef Island down-




          stream approximately to the Tennessee/Mississippi State Line.

-------
MISSION PURPOSE




     The expressed purpose of this reconnaissance mission was to provide




the following capabilities:




     (a)  Appraise the ground survey team of the current status of the




          suspected outfalls detected in the imagery from the first




          reconnaissance mission.




     (b)  Locate any industrial or public outfalls that were not detected




          in the imagery from the previous mission.




CHRONOLOGICAL DATA




     The flight parameters of this mission are as follows:




     (a)  Time over target - 1100-1300 hours CST in which the entire




          reconnaissance task was fulfilled.




     (b)  Flight Altitude




          1.  Photographic imagery was recorded at 3,000 AGL (above




              ground level) providing a scale of 1:6,000.




          2.  Infrared Line Scanner (explained in the Aircraft Sensor




              Section) imagery was recorded at 1,000 feet AGL at a scale




              of 1:10,500.




AIRCRAFT SENSOR DATA




     The reconnaissance data were recorded aboard two high performance




aircraft.  These aircraft contained three framing cameras and an Infrared




Line Scanner (IRLS).  All cameras were mounted in the tri-vertical array,




i.e., mounted in their respective vertical positions coincident with the




nadir of the aircraft.  Each of the cameras was uploaded with different

-------
film/optical filter combinations.  They were capable of recording the

presence of optical energy within  the  following bands of the optical

spectrum:

     (a)  Near ultraviolet,  resulting  in a 4.5" X 4.5" negative-Kodak

          2475 recording film with a Wratten 47A gelatin optical filter.

     (b)  Visible region of the optical spectrum, resulting in a true

          color 4.5" X 4.5" positive aerographic ektachrome transparency-

          Kodak S0-397 aerographic ektachrome film with a Wratten

          HF-3/HF-5 optical filter combination.

     (c)  Near Infrared region of  the  optical spectrum which was overlapped

          with a portion of the visible spectrum (red, orange), resulting

          in an aerographic ektachrome 4.5" X 4.5" false color (rendition)

          transparency - Kodak 2443 aerographic film with a Wratten 16

          gelatin optical filter.

     The viewing angle of each camera  was 41° about the aircraft's nadir

as shown below:
                                                   AIRCRAFT
                                                   ALTITUDE
                         GROUND LEVEL

-------
     The IRLS is a cryogenic device (optical  and  electronic) capable of


detecting passive electromagnetic energy resulting  from  target  thermal


emissions in the infrared band from 8  to 14 microns (1 micron=10   meters)


It has a cross-track scan angle of 120°  about the aircraft's nadir, as


shown below:
          T
      AIRCRAFT
      ALTITUDE
          I
                               MOUND LEVEL





     The true color photographic technique served  as  a  real-world  color


basis for the photo interpretation of the imagery  obtained during  this mission,


     The ultraviolet near infrared photographic  media and the  IRLS pro-


vided further refinements in the positive detection,  location  and  iden-


tification of all outfalls and dispersion patterns detected  in the res-


pective target areas.  The ultraviolet photography has  been  used exten-


sively in the detection of oil present on fresh  and salt water.  The false


color infrared film was used for the isolation of  shrouded or  masked (due


to color likeness or foliage) waterways and provided  detailed  information


on outfall dispersion patterns (due to wider color separation  in the false

-------
color rendition).  It provided information regarding relative turbidity/DO

levels in addition to biological growth detection and identification.

DESCRIPTION OF DATA REDUCTION

     An immediate interpretation report from the  airborne reconnaissance

data was transmitted by telecon to the Chief of the Ground  Survey party

on 22 February 1972.  A more detailed interpretation report  is presented

in the following paragraphs as identified by the specific waterways.

Only those outfalls and drainage ditches which were apparent discharge

media,-are listed.  Each location is identified, by its specific number,

on the maps given in Appendix A.

NONCONNAH CREEK

     The-water volume in Nonconnah Creek was considerably  lower than

when the previous mission (7 January 1972) was flown.

     1.   A small stream enters Nonconnah Creek on the southern bank

          approximately 400 yards upstream of the first railroad bridge

          above McKellar Lake.  The dark green plume from  this stream

          maintained its identity for at least 70 feet downstream as

          it followed the southern bank of the creek.
                                     •  i
     2.   A large storm drain outlet was located on the northern shore

          of Nonconnah Creek approximately 360 feet downstream from the

          Third Street bridge.  The discharge from this drain was dark

          green in color.  It followed the northern shore  of Nonconnah

          Creek downstream for approximately 350 feet.  The volume of the

          discharge was not large.

-------
3.   There was a drainage ditch located on Nonconnah Creek's




     southern bank approximately 440 feet upstream of  the second




     railroad bridge.   There was no  discharge  from this creek at




     the time of flight.




4.   Cane Creek flows  into Nonconnah Creek,  from  the north,




     approximately 1,000  yards upstream from the  third railroad




     bridge that crosses  the latter  creek above McKellar Lake.  The




     water flowing from Cane Creek into Nonconnah Creek displayed




     a greenish-gray color at the time of flight.  This color




     usually indicates the presence  of untreated  sewage.  The dis-




     charges from Cane Creek could be traced about 300 feet down-




     stream along the  northern bank  of Nonconnah  Creek before com-




     plete dispersal had  been achieved.




5.   On the northern bank of Nonconnah Creek approximately 1,200




     feet downstream from the Highway 55 bridge was a drainage




     ditch exit.  There was very little water, which appeared dark




     brown in color, in this ditch.   There were traces of discoloration




     in the Nonconnah  Creek waters adjacent  to the ditch exit.




6.   Another drainage  ditch was located on the southern bank of




     Nonconnah Creek and  70 feet downstream  from the Highway 55 bridge.




     The flow of water from this ditch into  Nonconnah Creek at  the




     time of flight was small, exhibiting no apparent discoloration.




7.   It is noteworthy  to  mention that a drainage  ditch, located




     immediately below a  diking weir on the  northern bank of Nonconnah

-------
     Creek approximately 1,700 yards  upstream  of  the  Belleview

     Boulevard bridge,  would  most possibly  serve  as a drainage

     conduit for the storm sewers in  this area during high-water

     conditions.  There was no outfall present at the time  of flight.

8.   A storm drainage outlet, positioned 1,200 yards  downstream from

     the Holly Ford Road bridge,  was  connected to a feeder  drainage
         \
     ditch from a small industrial area that contained  open storage

     of dump truck loads of material  or refuse.   At the time of

     flight, no discharge from this area was detected.

9.   Approximately 1,400 feet upstream of  the  Airways Road  bridge

     a drainage ditch cuts the northern bank of Nonconnah Creek.

     This drainage ditch serviced the area  north  of Highway 240.

     At the time of imaging,  the  flow of water in this  ditch was

     minimal and no discoloration was noted in Nonconnah Creek.

10.  Another open drainage ditch  cuts the northern bank of  Nonconnah

     Creek 350 feet downstream from the Lamar  Avenue  bridge.  The

     flow of water was  negligible and no discoloration  was  noted.

11.  An open drainage ditch,  located  250 feet  upstream  of the Lamar

     Avenue bridge on the northern bank of  Nonconnah  Creek,  contained

     water whose turbidity was greater than that  of the Creek.

     There was a small  discharge  of this water, which dispersed

     quickly, into the  creek.

12.  On the norchern bank, midway between the  Lamar Bridge  and the

     Get Well bridge, was another open drainage ditch with  the dis-

     charge having a greater  turbidity than that  of Nonconnah Creek.

-------
                                                                    8






     There were numerous drainage ditches and  storm drains  that were  not




listed in this section of the report  because there was  no water present




in them at the time of flight, and as a result,  no constructive evaluations




could be made regarding their functional use.




WOLF RIVER




     Only those discharge media that  appeared  to be  introducing foreign




substances into the Wolf River waters are listed herein.




     13.  Tree shadows mask an area downstream from  the river's southern




          bank from the single track Illinois  Central railroad bridge,




          that was immediately upstream of the Thomas Street bridge.




          Approximately 130 feet downstream from the  R.R. bridge,  along




          the southern bank of the river, a greenish  colored substance




          of considerable volume was  readily seen.   As  this substance




          follows the current downstream, it tends  to maintain  its




          surface identity with little dispersion.   For the most  part,




          the furthest point downstream that this substance could  be




          seen was 1,300 feet from the confluence of  the  Mississippi  and




          Wolf Rivers.  Traces of the. substance were found  at the  confluence




          of the two rivers but in no significant concentrations.   The




          imagery also indicated that this discharge contained  significant




          amounts of chlorophyll.




     14.  Cypress Creek enters the south bank of Wolf River 2,200  feet




          downstream from the Watkins Street bridge.  The water  in Cypress




          Creek was more turbid than that in Wolf River.  The outflow from




          Cypress Creek appeared to be small and dissipated rapidly into




          the river.

-------
     15.   A small  stream  45  feet wide on  the southern bank and approxi-




          mately 930  yards upstream of  the Illinois Central double




          track railroad  bridge contained very  turbid water.  The dis-




          charge into Wolf River was minimal.




     16.   The discharge from Harrison Creek was a  lighter green color




          than the water  of  Wolf River  and was  completely dispersed




          within 35 feet  after entering the River.




     17.   Fletcher Creek entered  the northern bank of Wolf River approxi-




          mately 650 yards downstream from Highways 70/79 bridge.  The




          water from Fletcher Creek appeared slightly lighter  in color




          than the yellowish-brown waters of Wolf  River.  The  waters were




          mixing rapidly and there was  no plume of any  significance.




LOOSAHATCHIE RIVER




     Only that portion of the river  immediately downstream of  Todd Creek




was photographed.   In this area,  the river  is very turbid exhibiting a




yellowish-brown color nearly identical  to that  of  Wolf  River.  The color




hue was constant over the section of  the river  covered.




MISSISSIPPI RIVER  (MEMPHIS.  TENNESSEE)




     In this section of the  report,  only the  eastern  or Tennessee bank




of the Mississippi River will be discussed.




     18.   The volume of yellowish-brown turbid  water  from the  Loosahat-




          chie River was considerably  less  than that  seen in previous




          aerial coverage of this area.  The  dispersal  pattern of  the




          Loosahatchie water appeared  to drift  out and  upstream  in  the




          Mississippi River  for a distance of  approximately  1,200  feet




          where it achieved  nearly complete dispersal (see Figure  1).

-------
APPROXIMATE  SCALE
   1:  4,400
                                      LOOSAHATCHIE RIVER
                          OUTFLOW FROM
                        LOOSAHATCHIE RIVER
        Figure 1 Loosahalchic  River and Interceptor

-------
                                                               10






19.   The Loosahatchie Interceptor  discharge  plume  penetrated  into




     the Mississippi River  80 feet from the  eastern bank.   It had




     completely dispersed within 125  feet  from  the outfall.




20.   Approximately 1,450 feet downstream from the  Loosahatchie




     River was a ditch carrying a  very  dark, almost black,  liquid




     which was discharging  into the Mississippi River.   The plume




     from this outflow extended 30 feet out  into the  River  from




     the eastern bank and paralleled  the east bank of the Mississippi




     for at least 1,000 feet before dispersing  completely.




21.   The Wolf (sewage) Interceptor was  observed 5,300 feet  upstream




     from the mouth of Wolf River. The substance, being discharged




     into the Mississippi River, was  a  very  dark brown color. The




     outfall plume followed the River's eastern bank  downstream




     approximately 3,000 feet before  complete dispersion was  achieved




     (Figure 2).  The outfall's deepest penetration  into the  River




     was 100 feet from the eastern bank.  The  thermal imagery indicated




     that this outfall was somewhat warmer than the ambient  tempera-




     ture of the Mississippi River.




22.   The yellowish-brown outflow from Wolf River was  not as pronounced




     as that displayed in the previous  flight's coverage.   The water




     from Wolf River penetrated into  the Mississippi  River  for approxi-




     mately 100 feet from the eastern bank and  paralleled  the eastern




     bank of the Mississippi River finally dispersing within approxi-




     mately 800 feet.

-------

WOLF INTERCEPTOR
AND OUTFLOW PLUME
                                              V
                                                  'X
                                                           APPROXIMATE SCALE
                                                               1: 4,400
                  Fifrure2  Wolf Inlcrcntor and  Outflow Phinie

-------
                                                               11






23.  The outflow,  from the pumping station between Front  Street




     and Wolf River lagoon, was lighter in color  than the water  in




     the lagoon.   The thermal imagery indicated  that this outflow




     was warmer than the lagoon's water.   The outfall plume maintained




     its identity for approximately 400 feet as  it traveled northward




     in the lagoon.




24.  A drainage ditch, located 3,300 feet downstream from the Crump




     Boulevard bridge, was discharging a very dary brown  (most domin-




     ant color) substance.  This substance was entering the River




     very slowly.   This ditch was 36 feet wide and positioned immed-




     iately below a tank farm with unloading dock facilities. A line




     of barges 25 feet from shore contained the  outflow from this




     ditch to the river bank area.




25.  Approximately 100 feet downstream from the  drainage  ditch




     mentioned in 24, was a small cove.  Floating on the  surface of




     this cove was a white viscous substance covering an  area 90 feet x




     25 feet.  The row of barges, tied up approximately 25 feet  from




     the eastern bank of the Mississippi River,  was containing this




     white substance along the Mississippi River  bank and not allowing




     it to disperse.




26.  The Nonconnah interceptor, located on the Mississippi River's




     eastern bank 3,500 feet downstream from the mouth of Tennessee




     Chute (from McKellar Lake), was discharging  a greenish-gray




     substance at the time of flight.  This discharge was penetrating




     the Mississippi River waters approximately  80 yards  from the

-------
                                                                    12






          eastern bank and flowed downstream achieving nearly complete




          dispersion within 3,000 feet from the mouth of  the interceptor




          conduit.  The thermal imagery indicated  that this outfall  was




          significantly warmer than the ambient temperature of the re-




          ceiving water.  Approximately 1,350 feet upstream from the




          Mississippi River and on the southern bank of the Nonconnah




          interceptor conduit was a discharge pipe at least six feet in




          diameter that was discharging the greenish-gray substance  into




          the interceptor chute (Figure 3).  The substance appeared  to




          be untreated domestic sewage.




MCKELLAR LAKE (TENNESSEE CHUTE)




     27.  There was a small drainage ditch at the northern end of




          McKellar Lake that had a small outflow into the Lake.  No




          discoloration was apparent.




     28.  On the eastern shore of the Harbor Channel, an outfall was seen




          on the waterfront of an area containing some petroleum storage




          tanks.  At the time of imaging the outfall was above the water




          level in the Harbor Channel.  This outfall appeared to be  a




          pipe, approximately three feet in diameter, discharging a  fluid




          into the Harbor Channel.  The thermal imagery indicated that




          the contents of this outfall were warmer than the ambient tempera-




          ture of the Channel.  In the photographic imagery the plume from




          this outfall could be seen for approximately 400 feet as it




          flowed in a generally northeast direction.  The deepest pene-




          tration of this plume into the Channel was 300 feet from shore




          (see Figure 4)

-------
MISSISSIPPI
RIVER  FLOW
                                                             APPROXIMATE SCALE
                                                                   1:4,503
                         Figure 3.  Noncoanah Interceptor

-------
   SCALE  1:24,000
4B) SCALE 1:4,500
                                             OUTFALL
                                 HARBOR  CHANNEL
                   4 STORAGE

                     TANKS
© ©
e ©
®° 16 STORAGE
o ©
eo TANKS

© O"
o e
             Fitfiire 4-Outfall  OK Harbor Channel

-------
                                                                    13






SUMMARY;




     The 28 outfalls and drainage ditches,  listed in this report,  were




identified in the airborne imagery recorded on 17 February 1972.   At the




time of imaging, these 28 sites showed sufficient indications that they




were or had the potential of introducing polluted effluence into  the




five waterways covered in this report.  The most significant effluent




in the area appeared to be that of nearly raw sewage.  Numerous ditches




through out the target area appeared to serve only as natural drainage.

-------
 PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------