^ mmm^m United Sjtates
^•y EPA Environmental Protection Office of
Agency Air and Radiation
Endorsed by the Executive Board
Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors
STRATEGY FOR FEDERAL/STATE
COOPERATION ON RADON
CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
DEVELOPMENT
Printed on Recycled Paper
-------
STRATEGY FOR FEDERAL/STATE COOPERATION ON RADON
CERTIFICATION PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Prepared by:
S. Cohen & Associates, Inc.
1311 Dolley Madison Boulevard
McLean, VA 22101
under
Contract No. 68D90170
Work Assignment No. 1-33
Prepared for:
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Radiation Programs
401 M Street, S.W.
Washington, D.C. 20460
Endorsed by the Executive Board Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors
November 1991
-------
STATE RADON CERTIFICATION GUIDANCE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION 1
A. Background 1
B. Purpose and Structure 1
H. FEDERAL AND STATE ROLES 3
A. Factors for Determining Federal and State Roles 3
1. Types of Radon Services Provided 3
2. Radon Service Evaluation Activities 4
3. Principles for Determining Federal/State Roles 5
B. Analysis and Determination of Federal and State Roles 7
1. Device Manufacturers 7
2. Commercial Calibration Facilities 7
3. Measurement Laboratories 9
4. Radon Measurement Operators 10
5. Mitigation Contractors 11
III. FEDERAL RADON QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES 13
A. Current EPA Programs 13
1. Radon Measurement Proficiency (RMP) Program 13
2. Radon Contractor Proficiency (RCP) Program 15
3. Regional Radon Training Centers (RRTCs) 16
B. How the Federal Role is Fulfilled 17
1. Device Manufacturers 17
2. Commercial Calibration Facilities 17
3. Measurement Laboratories 17
4. "Measurement Operators 18
5. Mitigation Contractors 18
IV. STATE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM OPTIONS 19
A. Consumer Information Option 20
B. Mandatory Federal Program Option 20
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
C Mandatory Federal Program - Plus 21
1. Measurement Laboratories 22
2. Radon Measurement Operators 23
3. Mitigation Contractors 24
D. Summary of State Options 26
V. STATE FUNDING OPTIONS AND RECIPROCITY 28
A Funding.Options 28
1. State Appropriations 28
2. Fees * 28
3. EPA State Indoor Radon Grants (SIRG) 29
B. Reciprocity Among States 29
VL RECOMMENDATIONS 31
Summary of State Programs APPENDIX A
List of State Contacts APPENDIX B
List of Four Radon Regional Training Centers
List of Regional Offices
-------
I. INTRODUCTION
A. Background
Radon is a colorless, odorless gas formed by the decay of radium and uranium.
Based on current data, radon is the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United
States. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established the Radon Action
Program (RAP) in 1985 to address this serious public health problem.
The RAP was designed to assess the magnitude of the radon problem, develop
strategies for reducing indoor radon levels, build State and private sector radon
assessment and reduction capabilities, and provide the public with information on the
health risks of radon. In 1986, the Congress passed the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act (SARA), provisions of which authorized the EPA to take the
leading role in the national effort to reduce indoor radon levels. The Indoor Radon
Abatement Act of 1988 (IRAA) authorized the EPA to assist State radon abatement
programs.
The IRAA and subsequent appropriations legislation directed the EPA to develop
voluntary proficiency programs to evaluate the effectiveness of radon devices,
organizations, and operators. The EPA developed two major proficiency programs to
implement this directive: the Radon Measurement Proficiency (RMP) Program and the
Radon Contractor Proficiency (RCP) Program. These program assist states and
consumers in identifying capable radon service providers. The Agency also established
four Regional Radon Training Centers (RRTCs). These Centers provide radon
measurement and mitigation training for individuals and organizations seeking to enter
the radon measurement and mitigation businesses. They also assist States by tailoring
training programs to meet specific state needs.
States play a critical role in evaluating radon service providers and ensuring that
consumers receive quality radon services. They provide consumers with information and
advice on selecting radon service providers, and respond to consumer complaints about
inadequate services or fraudulent business practices. Some States operate certification
programs and others are considering developing such programs.
B. Purpose and Structure
The purpose of the guidance is to assist States in developing radon certification
programs. This document provides guidance to States on possible elements of State
Radon Certification Programs. It builds upon existing EPA proficiency programs,
encourages consistency and reciprocity among State certification programs, and provides
a framework for strengthening the State/Federal system for ensuring that quality radon
services are provided to the public. This document offers States a variety of certification
program options, and provides specific recommendations on certification program
1
-------
elements. In so doing, jt recognizes a need for State flexibility in determining optimal
radon consumer information and protection activities.
The guidance integrates current Federal and State radon quality assurance activities
with options for future State program activities. It consists of the following sections:
o Federal and State Roles
Explanation of the rationale underlying Federal and State roles in ensuring quality
radon services.
o Federal Radon Quality Assurance Activities
Description of Federal radon quality assurance activities and how they fulfill
Federal roles.
o Options for State Radon Certification Programs
Provides options for State radon certification program elements for measurement
laboratories, measurement operators, and mitigation contractors.
o State Funding and Reciprocity
Furnishes alternatives for funding of State programs and information on
reciprocity arrangements among States.
o EPA Recommendations
Offers recommendations on optimal State certification program elements.
-------
n. FEDERAL AND STATE ROLES
This section identifies Federal and State roles in radon quality assurance and explains
the rationale underlying them. It does not suggest specific ways in which Federal and
State governments should fulfill their roles - this decision is left to the governmental
units involved. Furthermore, the identification of a Federal or State role does not
necessarily suggest that it is appropriate to develop a program directed specifically
toward fulfilling that role. Wherever possible, Federal and State governments should
take advantage of market mechanisms, non-governmental talent, and private sector
initiatives to assist them in ensuring quality radon services.
A. Factors for Determining Federal and State Roles
This document determines Federal and State roles for radon quality assurance on the
basis of three factors. These factors and the analyses conducted are designed to ensure
development of a nationwide radon quality assurance system that informs and protects
consumers in the most effective, efficient, consistent, and responsive way possible. The
three factors are:
o The type of radon services provided to the public (i.e. radon service sectors).
o The type of radon quality assurance activity being conducted.
o Basic principles for determining Federal and State roles.
These factors are described in detail below.
1. Types of Radon Services Provided (Radon Service Sectors^
Radon service providers vary considerably in the types of services they provide to
consumers. Federal and State authorities may address these types of radon services
differently to ensure quality service is provided. This document divides radon service
providers into five categories, each of which provides services that affect the overall
quality of radon service provided to the public. These provider categories, the types of
services they provide, and how they impact the quality of services provided to consumers
are described below:
Measurement Device Manufacturers
Manufacture measurement devices in the marketplace e.g. charcoal canisters, alpha-
track devices, electret ion chambers, continuous radon monitors, and other devices.
The effectiveness of measurement devices produced by manufacturers directly affects
the accuracy of radon measurement results provided to consumers.
-------
Commercial Calibration Facilities
Calibrate measurement devices for other radon service providers. The quality of
calibrations conducted for radon service providers affects the accuracy of radon
measurement results provided to consumers.
Measurement Laboratories
Offer radon measurement analysis and other services for devices requiring a
laboratory (e.g. analyses of charcoal adsorption and alpha track devices). Radon
measurement results provided to consumers are only as accurate as the analyses
conducted by these laboratories.
Radon Measurement Operators
Operators of on-site reading devices (e.g. continuous radon monitors), operators who
place and retrieve measurement devices, or individuals who provide radon
consultation services. Consumers make decisions on the need for mitigation based on
the results and advice provided by radon measurement operators.
Mitigation contractors
Providers of radon mitigation services. Consumers depend upon mitigation
contractors to reduce elevated radon levels in their buildings.
2. Radon Service Evaluation Activities
Federal and State governments (and potentially other organizations) undertake
different types of activities to ensure that consumers receive quality radon services. They
set standards or requirements for how radon services should be provided. They may also
monitor and enforce compliance with standards and requirements. Specific definitions of
these two types of activities are provided below:
Standards
Activities that set up standards for radon service providers to follow and/or require or
recommend radon service providers to carry out various operations, e.g. register or list
with Federal or State authorities, participate in training etc.
Monitoring
Activities that monitor and/or enforce compliance with standards or requirements.
-------
3. Principles for Determining Federal/State Roles
This document uses four principles to determine appropriate roles for Federal or
State governments in ensuring quality radon services. These principles recognize the
need to maintain currently effective program activities. They also direct future activities
toward ensuring that radon quality assurance activities use resources cost effectively, treat
radon service providers consistently and responsively, and set standards and requirements
that ensure quality delivery of different kinds of radon services.
All four principles apply to each of the five previously defined sectors of the radon
industry. However, different principles apply, depending on whether the activity involves
setting standards or monitoring and enforcing existing requirements. Descriptions and
applications of the principles to standards and monitoring activities are presented below.
Preservation of Effective Programs
Current radon quality assurance programs provide valuable information and
protection to consumers. This information and protection should not be eliminated as
a result of this guidance. EPA recommendations on Federal and State roles seek to
preserve effective Federal and State radon quality assurance programs. The principle
of preserving effective programs applies to both standards and monitoring activities.
Effective radon quality assurance programs ensure provision of quality radon services
without unnecessarily burdening radon service providers. This document does not
attempt to determine the effectiveness of existing radon quality assurance programs -
this task is left to the governmental units involved. Federal and State governments
should evaluate the effectiveness of their programs on a continuing basis to assure
provision of quality radon services and eliminate unnecessary burdens on radon
service providers.
Ease and Cost of Implementation
This principle encourages efficient use of Federal and State resources for ensuring
quality radon services. Quality assurance activities should be conducted at the level
of government where they are easiest and least costly to implement. For example,
economies of scale (efficiency resulting from the implementation of activities over a
wide area) or extensive technical capability implies a Federal role in areas that are
not variable from State to State or region to region. For example, tests that cover
material or procedures that are applicable on a nationwide basis may be less
expensive to develop at the national level, while monitoring and enforcement may be
performed less expensively at the State level due to close proximity to particular
service providers. This principle applies to both standards and monitoring activities.
-------
Geographic Scope of the Radon Service Provider
This principle is important for ensuring consistency and responsiveness in the
treatment of radon service providers. A very wide scope of provider operation
suggests a Federal role to ensure consistency and minimize burdens on service
providers. A narrow scope of service provider operation suggests a strong State role.
States can combine consistent treatment of local service providers with responsiveness
to the concerns of both providers and local consumers. This principle applies to both
standards and monitoring activities.
Geographic Variability of the Radon Service Provided
This principle ensures that consumer information and protection activities are
effective in assuring the quality provision of different kinds of radon services. Radon
services that are similar nationwide suggest a strong Federal role, while variability in
the nature of a particular type of service nationwide implies a stronger State role.
This variability may apply to either a particular type of service or to the appropriate
steps taken to provide that service. For example, radon mitigation services are
provided nationwide, but appropriate mitigation techniques and procedures might
vary geographically. Consequently, a Federal role in radon mitigation may be
appropriate, along with a State role relating to the techniques and procedures that are
specific to that State or region.
This principle is important for standards activities, since the effectiveness of particular
standards depend on the nature of the service being provided. This principle is not as
important for monitoring activities because the appropriate level of government to
conduct monitoring and enforcement does not necessarily depend on the nature of
the standard or the governmental unit that set it. For example, it is relatively easy for
States to monitor and enforce similar standards and requirements; it is difficult for
Federal authorities to monitor and enforce varying standards and requirements in fifty
States.
B. Analysis and Determination of Federal and State Roles
We can determine recommended roles for Federal and State governments by applying
the principles outlined above to the five sectors of the radon service industry and
different types of radon quality assurance activities. In some cases, all appropriate
principles suggest a clear role for Federal or State governments. In other cases, the
principles suggest a mix of Federal and State roles. The nature of this mixed role
depends on the radon service sector, the type of radon quality assurance activity being
conducted, and the principles involved.
-------
The following analysis applies the appropriate principles to each of the five categories
of providers for both standards and monitoring activities. Table 2-1 applies the principles
to standards activities directed toward the five radon service sectors. Table 2-2 applies
appropriate principles to monitoring activities for the five radon service sectors.
TABLE 2-1: STANDARDS ACTIVITIES
Radon
Device CaUbnUon Measurement Measurement Mitigation
PRINCIPLE Manufacturers Facilities Laboratories Operators Contractors
Preserving Federal Federal Federal/State Federal/State Federal/Slate
Effective
Programs
Ease of Program Federal Federal Federal/State Federal/State Federal/Stale
Implementation
Geographic Federal Federal Federal Slate Slate
Scope of Provider
Similarity/ Federal Federal Federal Federal/State Federal/State
Variability of
Scffvict Provided
TABLE 2.2 MONITORING ACTIVITIES
Device Calibration Measurement Measurement Mitigation
PRINCIPLE Manufacturers Facilities Laboratories Operators Contractors
Preserving Federal Federal Federal/State Slate State
Effective
Eve of Program Federal/Slate Federal/State Federal/State Slate State
Implementation
Geographic Federal Federal Federal/State Slate State
Scope of Provider
Similarity/ Federal/Slate Federal/State Federal/State Slate State
Variability of
Service Provided
-------
1. Device Manufacturers
The principles suggest a dominant Federal role for standards for the manufacture of
radon measurement devices. Manufacturers of radon measurement devices generally sell
them nationwide and the devices operate similarly throughout the country. In addition,
the EPA's RMP Program is the major existing program that currently sets standards for
or monitors the effectiveness of radon measurement devices. If a program specifically
directed toward device manufacturers were to be developed, it would require extensive
technical capability and would benefit from economies of scale. To the extent that
device manufacturers should be monitored to enforce national standards, these activities
could be carried out at either the Federal or State level.
2. Calibration Facilities
Applicable principles suggest a dominant Federal role for standards activities relating
to radon calibration faculties. Commercial calibration facilities provide similar services
on a nationwide basis. The EPA's Guidance on Quality Assurance will establish basic
procedures for calibration. Inter-facility comparison programs for commercial calibration
facilities, which assist in ensuring equivalent calibrations from different facilities, also
require extensive technical capability and large capital investments to finance radon
chamber facilities. Both Federal and State authorities may have a role in monitoring
commercial calibration facilities for compliance with national standards.
3. Measurement Laboratories
The principles suggest a mixed role for Federal and State governments in assuring
quality radon measurement laboratory services. An analysis of these mixed roles for
standards and monitoring activities is provided below.
Standards and Requirements
The geographic scope of the provider and geographic variability of the service
provided principles suggest a clear role for Federal authorities in setting standards for
radon measurement laboratories. Radon measurement laboratories generally provide
similar services to customers all around the country. By contrast, the principles of
preserving effective programs and ease of implementation suggest a mixed role. Both
Federal and State governments currently set standards for radon measurement
laboratories and both of them can set these standards with similar ease and efficiency.
Future standard development for measurement laboratories should be focused at the
Federal level. If a State has more stringent requirements than those of the Federal
government or other States, laboratories may choose to operate in those States with
less stringent requirements. Therefore, States should limit their standard setting for
measurement laboratories to those areas where they feel it is absolutely necessary to
ensure provision of quality measurement services in their State.
8
-------
Monitoring and Enforcement
The principle of geographic scope of provider suggests a clear role for Federal
authorities. However, the principles relating to preservation of effective programs and
ease of implementation suggest a mixed role.
Both Federal and State governments conduct activities to monitor radon measurement
laboratories, and both of them can implement these monitoring activities relatively
easily and cost effectively. They can both conduct blind tests of radon measurement
laboratories and audits of their facilities. States may be able to conduct the audit
function more easily and inexpensively because they are generally in reasonably close
geographic proximity to the facilities in their State. The EPA and States need to work
together closely to ensure maximum effectiveness of radon measurement laboratory
monitoring activities. States engaging in monitoring measurement laboratories should
work with their EPA Regional Office to coordinate their monitoring activities with
Federal monitoring activities.
There is a strong role for Federal authorities in ensuring the quality of radon
measurement laboratory services. However, States may want to supplement this role
with their own standard setting and monitoring activities. Additional State standards
could improve the quality of services provided, but at increased costs to radon
measurement laboratories which would have to adhere to differing standards throughout
the country. These increased costs may be passed on to consumers. Additional State
monitoring and enforcement of Federal standards could improve the quality of services
provided, but without substantial additional costs to competent measurement laboratories
and consumers.
4. Radon Measurement Operators
The principles suggest a mixed role in establishing standards for radon measurement
operators and a dominant State role in monitoring and enforcing standards and
requirements for these service providers. An analysis of these respective roles for
standards and monitoring activities is provided below.
Standards and Requirements
One principle applicable to standards activities suggests a dominant State role, while
three such principles suggest a mixed role. Radon measurement operators generally
operate on a State or regional level, thus suggesting a State role. However, the
services provided are generally similar, except for slight variations in placement and
use of devices due to geographic variability in environmental conditions and types of
buildings. Furthermore, both Federal and State governments currently operate
programs aimed at radon measurement operators, and these programs can be
operated cost effectively at either the Federal or State level. Federal authorities may
-------
be able to provide technical resources and capital investments necessary to develop
exams and other standards. However, States may be able to provide additional
standards that better address locally prevalent measurement conditions and practices.
Monitoring and Enforcement
The principles suggest a clear State role in monitoring radon measurement operators.
Measurement operators generally conduct business on a State or regional level, and
States currently operate the only monitoring programs for measurement operators.
States can monitor measurement operators cost effectively as compared to the Federal
government.
A Federal role is evident for activities relevant to radon measurement operators, but
primarily in settings standards and/or requirements. Future Federal standards for
measurement operators should focus on areas where services are similar and/or where
significant technical capability or large capital investments are required. State authorities
have a substantial role in supplementing Federal standards as necessary to address
specific variations in service delivery which are prevalent in their State or region (e.g.
peculiar environmental and geologic conditions and/or building stock). There is a
dominant role for States in monitoring and enforcing compliance with standards and
requirements for radon measurement operators. The Federal role in monitoring and
enforcement should focus on responding to State complaints relating to EPA listed
measurement operators.
5. Mitigation Contractors
The principles suggest a mixed role in establishing standards for radon mitigators and a
dominant State role in monitoring and enforcing standards and requirements for
mitigation contractors. An analysis of respective roles for standards and monitoring
activities is provided below.
Standards and Requirements
One principle applicable to standards activities suggests a dominant State role, while
three such principles suggest a mixed role. Radon mitigators generally operate on a
State or regional level, thus suggesting a State role. The services provided are
generally similar, except for variations in appropriate mitigation techniques which are
based on differences in building stock, building codes, and/or geologic conditions. Both
Federal and State governments currently operate programs aimed at radon mitigators.
Federal authorities may be able to provide technical resources and capital investments
necessary to develop exams and other standards. However, States may be able to
provide additional standards that better address locally prevalent mitigation techniques
and conditions.
10
-------
Monitoring and Enforcement
The principles suggest a clear State role in monitoring and enforcing radon mitigation
standards. Radon mitigators generally conduct business on a State or regional level.
States currently monitor radon mitigation standards and requirements, and they can do
so effectively as compared to Federal monitoring of radon mitigation installations.
There is a Federal role for activities relevant to radon mitigation contractors, but
primarily in settings standards and requirements. Future Federal standards for radon
mitigators should focus on areas where services are similar and where significant
technical capability or large capital investments are required. State authorities have a
substantial role in supplementing Federal standards as necessary to address specific
variations in service delivery which are prevalent in their State or region (e.g. peculiar
environmental and geologic conditions, building stock and building codes). There is a
dominant role for States in monitoring and enforcing compliance with standards and
requirements for radon mitigation contractors. Federal activities in this area should focus
on responding to State complaints about EPA listed contractors.
Table 2-3 summarizes the results of the above analysis for each category of service
provider and type of quality assurance activity. Designation of a role does not necessarily
mean that specific Federal or State programs are needed to address the radon service
sector in question. Market mechanisms, private sector initiatives, and/or other efforts
may be appropriate to ensure quality radon services.
Table 2-3: SUMMARY TABLE
Service Standards/ Monitoring/
Provider Requirements Enforcement
Device Federal Federal/
Manufacturers State
Calibration Federal Federal/
Facilities State
Measurement Federal/ Federal/
Laboratories State State
Radon Measurement Federal/ State
Operators State
Mitigation Federal/ State
Contractors State
11
-------
HI. FEDERAL RADON QUALITY ASSURANCE ACnvmES
The EPA currently operates three major programs which help to ensure the
availability of quality radon services. They are as follows:
o Radon Measurement Proficiency (RMP) Program
o Radon Contractor Proficiency (RCP) Program
o Regional Radon Training Centers (RRTCs).
This section summarizes these programs and describes how they fulfill the roles
defined in the previous section. These programs provide a base that States can use in
building their own radon measurement and mitigation certification programs. The
descriptions included are accurate as of September 1991. However, program
requirements and activities may change over time. Consequently, States should work
with EPA Regional Offices to ensure that they plan their activities based on current
information.
A. Current EPA Programs
1. Radon Measurement Proficiency fRMP') Program
The primary goal of the RMP Program is to provide consumers with a way of
selecting radon measurement organizations that meet minimum indoor radon
measurement proficiency requirements. The program assists States by (1) helping them
disseminate information to the public on radon measurement service providers and (2)
providing a criterion for making certification decisions. Organizations and individuals
participate in the program on a voluntary basis, and may submit applications at any time.
The EPA believes that most radon measurement organizations participate in the RMP.
About 75 percent of RMP Program participants currently meet the requirements
necessary to obtain EPA listed status.
Participants in the program are classified according to the type(s) of measurement
services they provide. The RMP Program currently recognizes two general types of
radon measurement services:
Primary Radon Measurement Services
A participant that analyzes or reads radon measurement devices is defined as a
"primary" for that device. This category includes radon measurement laboratories and
those radon measurement operators that provide reading or analysis services.
12
-------
Secondary Radon Measurement Services
A participant that offers a radon measurement service, but relies on another party for
the analysis of the device used, is defined as a "secondary" service operator. This type
of service may include consulting with the consumer, placing and retrieving
measurement devices, and/or reporting measurement results. It does not include
simple retail sale of measurement devices.
Both categories of participants are required to comply with all applicable program
requirements. The requirements provide a minimum level of assurance that
organizations and individuals passing the RMP Program will provide accurate radon
and/or radon decay product measurements to consumers. Participants that violate
program requirements are subject to delisting. States may bring evidence of significant
non-compliance to the attention of EPA Regional authorities. The EPA is developing
procedures for delisting firms that fail to meet program requirements. Some of the
major requirements of the program are outlined below.
Quality Assurance Plan (QAP)
All participants are required to develop, operate by, and maintain a QAP for each
primary device or measurement method for which they are listed. QAPs developed by
participants address chain of custody and calibration procedures, background radon
checks, and spiked, blank, and replicate samples.
Radon Measurement Protocols
All participants must follow applicable EPA Radon Measurement Method Protocols.
EPA Guidelines on Measurement Reporting
All participants must report radon measurement results to the consumer in a
consistent and timely manner.
Consumer Information
All primary and secondary participants must provide printed mitigation information
together with the measurement results they provide to the consumer.
Use of RMP Listed Services
All secondary participants must use a listed primary participant for the analysis of the
radon measurement device(s) they use.
13
-------
Passing of a Radon Measurement Test
All primary participants must pass a radon measurement test to obtain and maintain
their listing. During a radon measurement test, participant measurement devices are
exposed to known radon concentrations in EPA radon chamber facilities. Radon
measurement tests are conducted at the time participants enter the program and
periodically thereafter.
Advertising of RMP Listing
Participants may only advertise their EPA listing using the phrase "Meets EPA
Requirements."
The EPA notifies participants if they have met program requirements. These listed
participants may use this notification to represent themselves to States and the public.
The EPA also publishes Proficiency Reports on a periodic basis. These reports include
current lists of successful RMP Program participants. States may verify a participant's
current status by contacting the RMP Program Information Service (RIS) at (919) 541-
7131.
2. Radon Contractor Proficiency (RCP) Program
The EPA established the Radon Contractor Proficiency (RCP) Program to evaluate
and provide information on capable radon reduction contractors. The program is
directed toward individual radon mitigators who evaluate buildings with elevated radon
levels, do radon diagnostics, and develop radon mitigation plans. These individuals hold
the highest level of responsibility within their companies. The RCP Program includes
several requirements that facilitate the proficiency of radon mitigation contractors.
Examination
The National Radon Mitigation Proficiency Exam is the primary means by which the
EPA measures radon mitigation proficiency. Mitigators who participate in the
program must pass the examination to obtain an EPA listing. The EPA developed the
examination in cooperation with state officials, expert radon mitigators, and a
professional examination firm. The examination sets a national baseline measure of
proficiency by evaluating contractors' knowledge of radon and radon reduction
methods. The exam is comprised of 150 multiple-choice questions covering six major
areas of mitigation practice. It is offered at many locations around the country.
Mitigation contractors are also required to pass a re-examination every two years to
maintain their RCP program listing. This re-examination includes new industry
practices and technology, as well as a review of radon reduction fundamentals.
14
-------
Training
The EPA requires hands-on radon mitigation training for all RCP listed contractors.
EPA-developed courses are offered at the Regional Radon Training Centers and
similar courses are offered by State and private organizations. The EPA approves
courses which provide this training. Participating radon mitigators must take their
training from EPA-approved training providers. Courses generally cover health effects,
building investigation, radon measurement and other diagnostic procedures, system
design, installation techniques, and system evaluation.
Mitigation Guidelines and Protocols
RCP listed contractors must adhere to current EPA Radon Mitigation Guidelines and
Protocols in performing mitigation work.
Continuing Education
The EPA recommends that RCP listed contractors undergo continuing education of
not less than 8 hours a year in areas such as new mitigation technology, worker health
and safety, and HVAC and radon mitigation. This training will assist RCP listed
mitigators in preparing for their biennial reexamination.
The RCP Program Proficiency Report lists mitigators who have successfully completed
RCP program requirements. The report is updated periodically to reflect additions and
deletions from the program. Contractors may be delisted due to failure to meet RCP
program requirements. States may bring evidence of non-compliance with program
requirements to the attention of Regional authorities. The EPA is finalizing procedures
for delisting RCP listed radon mitigation contractors.
3. Regional Radon Training Centers fRRTCsl
The 1988 Indoor Radon Abatement Act (IRAA) gave the EPA the authority to
establish Regional Radon Training Centers (RRTC). The purpose of these centers is to
provide information and training on radon to Federal and State officials, radon service
providers, school administrators, building and home inspectors, code officials, and others.
Based on the results of competitive solicitations, the EPA awarded grants to four
institutions to host an RRTC:
o Western Regional Radon Training Center at Colorado State University.
o Midwest University Radon Consortium (MURC - Universities of Minnesota and
Michigan and Kansas State University).
o Eastern Regional Radon Training Center at Rutgers University.
15
-------
o Southern Regional Radon Training Center at Auburn University (also includes
Texas A & M, and the University of Tulsa).
The RRTCs provide up-to-date .training in radon mitigation, measurement, and radon
resistant new construction. They may also provide specialized courses for real estate
agents, State and local officials, health professionals, and other audiences. In addition,
the RRTCs administer written examinations associated with the RCP Program. The
Centers are available to provide specialized expertise in radon measurement and
mitigation and work closely with State officials to meet State radon training needs. They
are a valuable resource for States that are developing radon certification programs.
B. How the Federal Role is Fulfilled
The previous subsection discussed the EPA's three major radon quality assurance
programs. This subsection defines how these programs and other Federal activities fulfill
the Federal roles defined in Section 2. The EPA evaluates and improves its radon
quality assurance activities on an ongoing basis.
1. Device Manufacturers
Federal authorities have published a set of environmental conditions that are typical of
real world exposures. The EPA conducts measurement tests in the RMP Program under
these conditions to help ensure that the devices can provide accurate results in "real-
world" conditions.
2. Commercial Calibration Facilities
The current RMP program requires calibration for primary laboratories and other
primary operators. The RMP Program QA/QC Guidance will provide more specific
information on calibration. The EPA allows for inter-comparison of commercial
calibration facilities to the EPA laboratories. The EPA collects information on the
quality of calibrations through the RMP Program.
3. Measurement Laboratories
The RMP program requires measurement tests for measurement laboratories and
other primary providers to determine their capability to make accurate radon
measurements. In the monitoring and enforcement area, the RMP Program carries out
blind tests and may conduct QA reviews to help assure compliance with RMP program
requirements. Efforts are being made to coordinate more closely with States on these
monitoring activities.
16
-------
4. Measurement Operators
Operators of devices that have an analysis capability are evaluated through
performance tests similar to those required of measurement laboratories. The RMP
program requires all listed measurement operators to use EPA measurement protocols
and standard operating procedures. Soon, measurement operators will also have to pass
a written examination. There are no Federal monitoring and enforcement activities for
this category of providers. Monitoring activities are limited to responding to complaints
from States about listed measurement operators.
5. Mitigation Contractors
The RCP program requires that mitigation contractors pass a written examination to
become RCP-listed and also requires participation in a hands-on training program.
Contractors are also required to adhere to EPA standards in their mitigation work.
Monitoring activities are currently limited to responding to complaints from States about
RCP listed contractors.
17
-------
IV. STATE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM OPTIONS
This section presents options for State radon quality assurance programs. These
options describe possible ways States may fulfill their roles in ensuring quality services
from measurement laboratories, measurement operators, and mitigation contractors. The
options presented are not all inclusive. They are presented to provide State authorities
with a structure to help them determine optimal program elements for their State.
Wherever possible, States should take advantage of market mechanisms, non-
governmental talent and private sector initiatives to assist them in ensuring quality radon
services.
There is no universally preferable structure for State radon quality assurance
programs. States have many options. Their choices regarding radon certification
program elements may depend on the extent of their concern about the radon problem,
their resources, and their activities to date. This guidance addresses three basic options
available to State radon authorities that build upon EPA's existing programs. States
may administer these potential programs themselves or they may work with private sector
organization(s) to administer them. These programs suggest an increasingly more
comprehensive approach to radon service quality assurance and control.
Consumer Information Option
Improving the quality of radon service providers by offering advice and responding to
citizens' complaints about radon service providers.
Mandatory Federal Programs Option
Ensuring the quality of radon services by mandating adherence to Federal programs
(RMP/RCP listing), providing consumer information, and responding to citizen
complaints about radon service providers.
Mandatory Federal Programs - Plus
Ensuring the quality of radon services by providing consumer information, mandating
adherence to Federal programs, and supplementing Federal programs with additional
State activities.
The following subsection describes these options in greater detail.
A. Consumer Information Option
This option preserves the status quo for most States. States use EPA's RMP and RCP
Programs to advise consumers on capable radon measurement laboratories, measurement
18
-------
operators, and mitigation contractors. They also caution consumers about the unknown
accuracy of non-proficient radon measurement devices and the.unknown capabilities of
non-proficient organizations. States use EPA public information brochures, mitigation
standards, measurement protocols, and technical guidance to educate the public on how
to obtain quality radon services.
States also play a critical role in addressing problems relating to the quality of radon
services that have already been provided. They may use EPA documents to help
consumers and service providers resolve questions and conflicts. States should also use
their consumer protection authorities (Attorney General's office, consumer fraud statutes,
etc.) to assist consumers in obtaining corrective action in cases where the services
provided have not met applicable requirements.
States may also initiate delisting actions against EPA listed service providers that
violate proficiency program requirements. States should contact their Regional EPA
office if they feel EPA delisting actions may be warranted. States may also bring cases to
the attention of the EPA that prompt changes in the RMP or RCP standards and
requirements.
Advantages:
o Educates radon service consumers.
o Places a minimum burden on radon service providers.
Disadvantages:
o Minimizes State control.
o Provides least protection to consumers.
B. Mandatory Federal Program Option
This option includes the consumer information activities discussed above, but also
mandates that all radon service providers in the State meet the standards and
requirements of EPA's Proficiency Programs. States may mandate adherence to EPA
Proficiency Program standards and requirements by legislative enactment or, in some
cases, by use of existing statutory authorities.
Advantages:
o Protects consumers by eliminating services of unproven providers.
o Offers the least costly mandatory option.
19
-------
o Allows enforcement of program requirements.
Disadvantages:
o Relies solely on consumer complaints to ensure adherence to standards and
requirements. No monitoring activities.
o Minimizes State control.
C Mandatory Federal Program - Plus
This option offers States a variety of different standards and monitoring activities that
build upon the Mandatory Program option described above. The options provided may
or may not be desirable, for particular States. In implementing this option, State
authorities may also conduct standards and monitoring activities in other areas of
particular concern, such as mitigation activities affecting building codes particular to their
jurisdictions.
Advantages:
o Provides greatest assurance of quality radon services
o Allows States to implement activities as needed.
Disadvantages:
o Increases use of State resources.
o Increases burdens on radon service providers.
The following discussion provides specific activities that States may want to apply to
measurement laboratories, radon measurement operators, and mitigation contractors.
The options provided are not all inclusive and may or may not be desirable for particular
States.
1. Measurement Laboratories
Standards Activities:
Registration/Listing
State authorities can require that primary laboratories obtain State registration before
commencing operation. Such registration allows States to be aware of service
providers in their States.
20
-------
Educational Requirements/Measurement Experience
States may require that laboratory supervisors and/or personnel attain some minimum
level of education (e.g. undergraduate degree) or serve an apprenticeship to gain
measurement experience.
Monitoring Activities:
General Monitoring
State authorities may review phone books and other radon service advertising to
ensure that organizations and individuals providing services within their boundaries are
RMP listed and meet any applicable State registration requirements. States may also
check consumer complaints regarding service providers against current RMP and State
registration lists. This will ensure swift response to citizens' complaints and expose
non-certified operators.
Blind Testing
States may initiate and conduct their own blind tests of radon measurement
laboratories. EPA laboratories may assist States by providing device exposures to the
extent possible within the constraints of other workload demands. Laboratories which
perform poorly on blind tests may be de-certified by the State or referred to the EPA
for blind testing under the RMP Program.
Records Reviews
State authorities can require that measurement laboratories mail in calibration reports
showing how their equipment has been calibrated. They can also request a copy of
laboratories' QA/QC plans to ensure that such a plan exists and that it meets both
EPA and any State requirements. State authorities may be able to review quality
assurance plans on a more comprehensive basis than the EPA.
On-Site Audits
State authorities may perform announced and unannounced audits of measurement
laboratories. States should provide State certified laboratories with information on
laboratory audit procedures to make them aware of what to expect and to encourage
compliance with applicable requirements. Audits may include review of QA/QC
programs, calibration records, control charts, measurement result reports, laboratory
staff, and other records.
21
-------
2. Radon Measurement Operators
Standards Activities:
Registration/Listing
States can require that measurement operators obtain State registration before
commencing operation. Such registration or listing allows States to be aware of service
providers in their States.
Examinations
States can supplement the RMP examination for radon measurement operators with
their own examination questions. Such questions may cover specialty topics that have
particular application to the State. States may also wish to sponsor future
measurement operator examination offerings in their State in cooperation with the
EPA and the Regional Radon Training Centers.
Educational Requirements/Measurement Experience
States may require that measurement operators attain some minimum level of
education (e.g. undergraduate degree) or serve an apprenticeship to gain measurement
experience. States may also require operators to obtain training in radon
measurement. This training might include instruction on operating specific radon
measurement devices, environmental factors affecting device selection, and/or
procedures specific to operation in their State or region. States may also want to
evaluate and approve qualified training providers.
Record Keeping and Information Submittal
States may wish to institute specific record keeping requirements for measurement
operators. These requirements might include records relating to calibration, quality
assurance/quality control programs, measurements provided to consumers and zip code
information relating to those measurements. States may use these records to monitor
compliance with program requirements and to conduct analyses of trends in radon
measurement work.
Monitoring Activities:
General Monitoring
State authorities may review phone books and other radon service advertising to
ensure that organizations and individuals providing services within their boundaries are
RMP listed and meet any applicable State registration requirements. States may also
22
-------
check consumer complaints regarding service providers against current RMF and State
registration lists. This'will ensure swift responses to citizens' complaints and expose
non-certified operators.
Records Reviews
State authorities may review calibration records, quality assurance/quality control plans,
standard operating procedures, measurement report results, and other required records
for compliance with State and EPA requirements. These reviews may be conducted
during office audits. States may also request that measurement operators mail copies
of these records for review on a periodic basis.
Blind Reviews
States may evaluate the extent to which measurement operators place devices
according to EPA protocols and/or operate their devices properly. They may conduct
these reviews by posing as consumers who request the services of measurement
operators at specific buildings. They could then evaluate the services they receive.
States which conduct this activity need to develop and publicize criteria for successful
services well in advance of conducting these evaluations. These criteria should be
consistent with applicable EPA and State requirements.
3. Mitigation Contractors
Standards Activities:
Registration/Listing
States can require that mitigation contractors obtain State registration before
commencing operation. Such registration allows States to be aware of mitigators in
their States.
Examinations
States can supplement the RCP examination with their own examination questions.
Such questions may cover specialty topics that have particular application to their
State. States may also wish to sponsor RCP examination offerings in their State in
cooperation with the EPA and the Regional Radon Training Centers.
Educational Requirements/Mitigation Experience
States may require that mitigation contractors attain some minimum level of education
or experience (e.g. undergraduate degree or building experience) or serve an
apprenticeship to gain mitigation experience. States may also require mitigators to
23
-------
obtain specific training on the building stock and building codes in their States. States
may also want to evaluate and approve qualified training providers.
Mitigation Protocols/Guidelines
States may supplement RCP guidelines and protocols with more specific or stringent
requirements that apply to their particular State.
QA Plan
States may require that mitigation contractors prepare and submit a QA Plan prior to
obtaining certification.
Building Codes
State and/or local authorities can amend existing building codes to ensure that new
construction practices deter the entry and concentration of radon gas. [Building codes
can also be amended to incorporate mitigation standards for existing buildings.] These
codes may be based on EPA standards or other State or local standards adapted to
local construction practices and/or geologic circumstances.
Record Keeping and Information Submittal
States may wish to institute specific record keeping requirements for mitigation
contractors. These record keeping requirements might include records of before and
after measurements, mitigation plans, diagnostic and mitigation techniques used, zip
codes, and other information relevant to the installation.
Monitoring and Enforcement Programs
General Monitoring
State authorities may review phone books and other radon service advertising to
ensure that organizations and individuals providing mitigation services within their
boundaries are RCP listed and meet any applicable State requirements. States may
also check consumer complaints regarding service providers against current RCP and
State registration lists. This will ensure swift responses to citizens' complaints and
expose non-certified operators.
Records Reviews
State authorities may review records on mitigation contractors and installations, and
other required records for compliance with State and EPA requirements. These
24
-------
reviews may be conducted during office audits. They may also request that mitigation
contractors mail copies of these records for review on a periodic basis.
Installation Inspections
States may inspect mitigation installations to review mitigation practices and
confonnance to mitigation protocols, guidelines and standards, building codes, and
other State requirements. In this way, they can expose poor mitigation practices,
decertify the offending parties, and, if necessary, advise the EPA of potential delisting
action.
D. Summary of State Options
These three optional program packages offer States a variety of possible State
certification program elements. Combined, they provide a flexible approach to managing
State radon quality assurance responsibilities and ensuring that there is a suitable
program for each State. The ultimate choice of option(s) obviously rests with the
individual State authorities. Tables 4-1 and 4-2 summarize activities that States could
undertake for measurement laboratories, measurement operators, and mitigation
contractors. As shown, not all activities apply to all categories of service providers, and
activities may vary as applied to different provider groups.
Table 4-1: STATE STANDARDS ACTIVITIES
Radon
Program Measurement Measurement Mitigation
Element Laboratories Operators Contractors
Registration/ XXX
Listing
Educational/ XXX
Experience Requirements
Record Keeping X X
Examination X X
Protocols/ X X
Guidelines
Building X
Codes
25
-------
Table 4-2: STATE MONITORING ACTIVITIES
Program
Element
Measurement
Laboratories
Radon
Measurement
Operators
Mitigation
Contractors
General
Monitoring
Record Keeping
Reviews
On-Site
Audits
Blind
Evaluation^)
Mitigation
Installation
Inspections
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
26
-------
V. STATE FUNDING OPTIONS AND RECIPROCITY
This section overviews options for funding State radon certification programs, and
discusses reciprocity among State certification programs.
A. Funding Options
There are three major options for funding State radon certification programs: (1)
State appropriations; (2) fees; (3) EPA State Indoor Radon Grants (SIRG). Each of
these options is briefly discussed below.
1. State Appropriations
States authorities can work with their State Legislatures to appropriate funds for radon
certification programs. State Legislatures may be more responsive to requests for such
appropriations if they are provided with evidence of radon quality assurance problems,
data on the extent of the State's radon problem, and information on other funding
sources such as fees and EPA SIRG Grants. State Legislators may also be interested in
radon certification program funding levels in comparable States. State authorities can
maximize the effectiveness of their efforts by presenting their recommendations to State
Legislators clearly and concisely.
2. Fees
States may also fund their radon certification programs through fees levied on radon
service providers. States may levy fees on applications submitted by service providers, or
for achievement of licensing or certification status. In the latter case, the fees would be
levied against service providers that have met certification requirements.
In addition there are other options that States have proposed for generating revenues
for their programs. Among these are:
o A special home improvement contractors' fund, which is financed by the registration
of home improvement contractors. It could be used for program administration and
covering consumer costs in cases of bad mitigation (was proposed in the State of
Connecticut).
o A surcharge on every new square foot of construction, irrespective of whether it has
radon resistant features, which may be used for program administration or as a trust
fund for correcting improperly installed radon mitigation systems (was proposed in
the State of Rhode Island).
27
-------
3. EPA State Indoor Radon Grants (SIRG)
Section 306 of the Indoor Radon Abatement Act (IRAA) authorizes the EPA to
provide States with grant funds to assist them in developing and implementing programs
for the "assessment and mitigation of radon." Most States currently receive SIRG
funding. This program is now in its third year of operation. Detailed information on
the SIRG Program can be found in EPA's Third Year Guidance for the State Indoor
Radon Grants Program. EPA Office of Radiation Programs, October 1991, and is
available through EPA's Regional Offices.
B. Reciprocity Among States
Reciprocity agreements among States are desirable in cases where radon organizations
and/or individuals provide identical or very similar services in different States. States may
enter into different kinds of reciprocal arrangements with one another. The agreements
can recognize and accept other States' complete certification programs, or they can
accept only particular features of another State's program (training, passage of an exam,
etc.).
Reciprocity arrangements minimize economic burdens on radon service providers who
have to comply with differing State certification requirements and fees. They may also
reduce the costs of radon services because service providers pass the costs of complying
with State requirements on to their customers. Reciprocity arrangements may also
reduce the operating costs of State certification programs by minimizing the number of
organizations and individuals who have to be processed and tracked through the
programs' different steps and requirements.
There are currently no specific reciprocity agreements among States in existence.
State requirements vary among the States that have some form of certification, licensing,
or registration program. While these differences in program requirements may be
appropriate, they present obstacles to development of reciprocity agreements among
States.
There are steps States can take to overcome these obstacles to reciprocity. These
steps are easier to implement for States whose programs are still developing, but they
can be implemented in States whose programs are in place. They are summarized
below.
o Legislative Authority
Reciprocity can only be achieved if States have the legislative authority to do so.
Many States are currently unable to consider reciprocal agreements with other
28
-------
States due to the lack of authority. Legislative authority for reciprocity agreements
may be a useful addition to certification statutes.
o Minimum Requirements
States that adopt uniform minimum requirements for radon service providers make
reciprocal arrangements easier to implement. In these cases, out-of-State radon
service providers can be granted complete or partial certification status based on
meeting or surpassing minimum standards. States can require RMP and/or RCP
listing for service providers. This requirement provides a minimum standard which
can serve as a basis for reciprocity agreements.
o Flexibility
The more flexible the features of a radon certification program, the more likely the
program will be suitable for reciprocal arrangements with other States. For
example, if only one option for educational background is stipulated by a program,
it becomes less likely that providers certified in other States will be able to meet the
requirement. However, if a number of options for educational background are
stipulated, then there is a better chance that providers certified in other States may
meet the requirement. Of course, flexibility should not be built into program
requirements in a way that compromises the assurance of quality services provided
to consumers.
States entering into reciprocity agreements may adopt equivalent certification
requirements (perhaps based on the RMP and RCP Programs), and make office audits,
laboratory inspections, and/or records reviews the responsibility of the "primary" State in
which the service provider has its office. Loss of certification in the "primary" State
would result in such loss in the reciprocal State. States that have entered into reciprocity
agreements have the option of charging higher fees in the "primary" State to account for
the increased costs associated with that service provider's certification.
This type of approach will minimize costs and may allow States to reduce any fees
charged to outside firms. Of course, it still may be desirable for States to inspect
mitigation installations and/or radon measurement services that are provided within their
State by outside service providers. This type of service could still require the imposition
of fees.
29
-------
VI. RECOMMENDATIONS
Four recommendations can be made based on the goal of ensuring that consumers
receive quality radon services. These recommendations also recognize State sovereignty
in implementing radon certification programs and industry concerns about conflicting
State program requirements.
o States should mandate the RMP/RCP programs: By mandating the Federal
RMP/RCP programs, States ensure that their consumers receive service only from
EPA-listed operators and thus provide a minimum level of quality assurance within
their States. State required RMP/RCP listing also provides a base of common
requirements which can be used in developing State reciprocity agreements.
o States should supplement these mandatory programs with active monitoring and
enforcement programs. Monitoring and enforcement programs ensure that Federal
and State standards actually lead to the delivery of quality radon services.
o States should supplement the mandatory RMP and RCP programs with any
additional standards and requirements mat are necessary to ensure quality radon
services in their particular State.
o States should estabb'sh reciprocal agreements among themselves, using the RCP and
RMP programs as a base. These agreements should minimize burdens of
conflicting requirements on radon service providers to the. extent possible without
reducing the level of assurance consumers can have in State certified radon firms
and operators.
30
-------
APPENDIX A
SUMMARY OF STATE PROGRAMS
The following information relates to State programs and regulations that were in place
as of October, 1991. Twelve States have some form of regulations relating to radon
measurement and mitigation service operators, either fully promulgated or in the draft or
interim stage. Two States, Maryland and Virginia, require that organizations only meet
Federal proficiency requirements. Kentucky has a voluntary registration program
dependent upon Federal proficiency requirements. There is a notation for States where
the regulations are not final.
CALIFORNIA
Certification. Registration or Licensing
Radon laboratory measurement/consultant and mitigation contractors are required to
be certified by the State. Certifications are renewable biennially.
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
Certification is dependent upon RMP-listed status.
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
Certification is dependent upon RCP-listed status.
OA Plan
QA plans in accordance with the RMP Program are required.
Education and/or Experience
Measurement/consultant classification: individuals are required to have a college
degree with a major in physical, biological or engineering science.
Training and/or Examination ReQuirement
Measurement/consultant classification: individuals are required to have 16 hours of
classroom training.
Audits (Office and/or Site)
None are required.
User Fees
Fees are $300 for laboratories, $200 for mitigators, and $100 for
measurement/consultant.
31
-------
CONNECTICUT
Certification. Registration or Licensing
Measurement laboratories, diagnostic specialists, and mitigation contractors are
required to be registered with the State.
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
Registration is dependent upon RMP-listed status.
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
Registration is dependent upon RCP-listed status.
OA Plan
The regulations refer to the RCP guidelines for quality assurance of mitigation
contractors.
Education and/or Experience
There are no requirements except for the training qualifications outlined below.
Training and/or Examination Requirement
Diagnostic specialists must complete an RMP related training program and mitigation
contractors must have a minimum of a 2-3 day approved training program.
Audits (Office and/or Site)
The Department of Consumer Protection can investigate measurement operators. The
Department of Health Services investigates mitigation contractors.
User Fees
There are no fees for the registration program. However, mitigation contractors are
charged by another State agency for doing business in the State.
32
-------
DELAWARE
Certification. Registration or Licensing
Radon measurement and mitigation firms are required to register with the State.
Registration must be renewed on an annual basis.
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
Registration is dependent upon RMP-listed status and/or source of testing devices.
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
Registration is dependent upon RCP-listed status.
OA Plan
There are QA guidelines for radon measurement and mitigation firms.
Education and/or Experience
Prerequisites are dependent upon sampling procedures and QA plan.
Training and/or Examination Requirement
Training prerequisites are dependent upon sampling procedures and QA plan.
Audits (Office and/or Site)
The State performs site audits on mitigation companies. The State reserves the right
to perform office and/or site audits on all measurement and mitigation companies
operating within the State of Delaware.
User Fees
At present there are no user fees.
FLORIDA
Certification. Registration or Licensing
The State requires the separate certification of businesses and individuals involved in
radon measurement and mitigation services.
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
The State requires RMP-listing and the use of RMP-listed devices.
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
Participation in the RCP program is currently voluntary.
33
-------
FLORIDA (Cont)
OA Plan
The State requires submission of a QA plan, which is approved on an individual basis.
The State will accept the RMP QA plan. For passive devices, the State requires QA
blanks and duplicates. Monitoring and enforcement programs include State review of
QA plans and annual on-site QA audits. On-site inspections apply only to firms
located within the State.
Education and/or Experience
Measurement specialists require 4 years of radiological experience of which 3 years
may be substituted by relevant college education. Measurement technicians require no
previous experience or education. Mitigation specialists require 4 years experience in
the construction industry of which 3 years may be substituted by relevant college
education. A State contractor's license also meets this requirement. Mitigation
technicians require 2 years of construction experience.
Training and/or Examination Requirement
Florida has training requirements which exceed those of the RMP/RCP programs.
Training is provided by approved RMP/RCP vendors. The State administers its
certification training examination a minimum of 3 times per year to qualified
applicants.
Audits (Office and/or Site)
Measurement and mitigation businesses are inspected annually for proper
maintenance of required records and adherence to measurement and mitigation rules
and guidelines.
User Fees
A $200 certification fee for both businesses and individuals covers application,
examination and a one-year certification.
ILLINOIS
Certification. Registration or Licensing
Registration is required only for radon measurement deployment consultants.
Measurement laboratories are exempt from registration, unless they also deploy
devices directly into homes.
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
None
34
-------
ILLINOIS (Cent)
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
None
OA Plan
There are no requirements.
Education and/or Experience
Deployment consultants must have either a bachelor's degree in science or an
associates degree with 2 years related experience, or 4 years related experience. An
approved radon measurement course can also be accepted as a qualification. RCP is
an accepted form of education/experience. RMP is an accepted form of
education/experience only for secondary organizations.
Training and/or Examination Requirement
There is a minimum training requirement, which is met if an individual is RMP listed.
There is no examination requirement.
Audits (Office and/or Site)
The State has the authority to perform audits.
User Fees
$100 per individual and $125 for firms.
INDIANA (Final rule expected March 1992)
Certification. Registration or Licensing
Certification is required for primary and secondary testers, measurement laboratories,
and mitigation contractors.
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
Certification is dependent on RMP listing or equivalent proficiency program and
submission of a sworn affidavit that the individual has read and agrees to the EPA's
"Indoor Radon and Radon Decay Product Measurement Protocols".
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
Certification is dependent on RCP listing or equivalent proficiency program.
OA Plan
There is no State requirement for a QA Plan.
35
-------
INDIANA (Cont)
Education and/or Experience
There is no level of formal education that secondary testers, primary testers, or
mitigators must achieve. However, at least one individual employed by a radon
laboratory must have either a Bachelor's degree from an accredited university or
college in the physical sciences or engineering or in a related field approved by the
commissioner, or a minimum of two years full-time experience, or equivalent, as
determined by the commissioner, in radiation measurement.
Continuing education involves all categories of certification and must be from a course
approved by the commissioner and must be at least six contact hours. Written
confirmation of attendance, signed by the course instructor, or its designee, must be
submitted at the time of application for recertification. However, full-time
employment by the certified individual for the prior two years may substitute for the
continuing education requirement provided written confirmation of full-time
employment, signed by the business owner or chief executive officer of the business
which employed the certified individual, has been submitted along with the application
for recertification.
Training and/or Examination Requirement
There are no State-administered examinations or State-administered training programs.
Audits (Office and/or Site)
The commissioner, his or her agents, and his or her employees have the right to enter
at all reasonable times in or upon any public or private property upon presentation of
appropriate credentials, to inspect any equipment or records pertaining to radon-222
testing, mitigation or analysis, to conduct radon-222 testing, to inspect radon-222
testing laboratories, or to inspect radon-222 mitigation facilities or equipment that has
been, or is to be, installed.
User Fees
Fees are levied for two years at the following rates: secondary tester $150, primary
tester $300, radon laboratory $300, and mitigators $250.
IOWA
Certification. Registration or Licensing
Iowa has an extensive certification program for both measurement laboratories and
measurement specialists. It also has an extensive accreditation program for mitigation
contractors.
36
-------
IOWA (Cont)
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
Measurement laboratories must be RMP listed.
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
Mitigation contractors must be RCP listed.
OA Plan
Iowa requires QA plans for all radon service operators, which are based on the EPA
guidance.
Education and/or Experience
Measurement and Mitigation specialists are required to be at least 18 years old and
have three years of relevant experience; college courses in areas such as energy,
natural sciences or engineering (can be substituted for experience in both
certifications). However, one year of relevant practical experience is required to be
certified as a mitigation specialist.
Training and/or Examination Requirement
Measurement specialists must successfully complete a state approved training course
and examination or be certified by another state with the same requirements.
Mitigation specialists must pass the RCP examination.
Audits fOffice and/or Site)
Iowa performs on-site audits on measurement laboratories, measurement operators,
and mitigation contractors. Although there is no regulated frequency of audits, the
goal is to audit once a year.
User Fees
Iowa imposes fees for both certification applicants and for annual State accreditation.
Application fees for both measurement and mitigation service operators are $25.00 for
residents and $100.00 for non-residents. Annual certification fees are $250 for
measurement specialists, and $500 for measurement laboratories. Mitigation
contractors must pay an initial annual fee of $150 and $40 per installation, for
installations over $200 in value, thereafter.
37
-------
KENTUCKY
Certification. Registration or Licensing
The State manages a voluntary registration program for measurement and mitigation
companies. Amendments to the State radiation control act to institute a mandatory
certification program for laboratories, testers, and mitigators have been submitted to
the Kentucky legislature for consideration in the 1992 session
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
Registration is dependent upon RMP-listed status.
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
Registration is dependent upon RCP-listed status.
MAINE (Final rule expected mid-1992)
Certification. Registration or Licensing
The State requires registration of all testing, measurement and mitigation companies
doing business in the State, including those based outside the State.
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
Registration is dependent upon RMP-listed status.
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
Registration is dependent upon RCP-listed status.
OA Plan
There will be a requirement for a QA plan. This is currently in draft stage.
Education and/or Experience
Although there are no educational prerequisites besides those necessary for the
RMP/RCP listing, there is a requirement for continuing education.
Training and/or Examination Requirement
The State requires RMP/RCP training or the equivalent for initial registration, as well
as continuing education.
Audits (Office and/or Site)
The State has the right to perform audits.
User Fees
The registration fee has not yet been determined.
38
-------
MARYLAND
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
All operators performing radon measurement testing must be RMP-listed.
NEBRASKA (Additional rules instituting licensing are being formulated)
Certification. Registration or Licensing
The State manages a registration program for measurement and mitigation companies.
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
Registration is dependent upon RMP listing.
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
None
OA Plan
There is no QA requirement.
Education and/or Experience
Registered measurement and mitigation companies must have on staff an individual
with a minimum of: a Bachelor's degree in nuclear science, health physics,
environmental health, physical sciences, biological sciences, or a related discipline; one
year's experience in radiation related matters and radioactivity measurement; and
completed training in an agency approved course on radon/radon decay product
measurements and/or radon remedial services. Technicians placing radon
measurement devices must have as a minimum course work in physics, mathematics,
chemistry, health physics equivalent to a 40 hour basic radiological health training
program and have completed training in an agency approved course.
Training and/or Examination Requirement
At least a one-week course in radon measurement and/or mitigation is required. The
RRTC course is approved.
Audits (Office and/or Site)
None
User Fees
There are no fees currently, although some may be instituted in 1992.
39
-------
NEW JERSEY
Certification. Registration or Licensing
State certification is required for all radon measurement and mitigation businesses and
their employees involved in testing and/or mitigation activities, and radon laboratories.
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
Radon measurement businesses and laboratories must provide proof of successful
completion of the EPA RMP or an authorized State RMPP.
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
New Jersey regulations established two classifications of mitigation personnel: a radon
mitigation specialist and radon mitigation technician. Both must pass New Jersey
radon certification examinations. The EPA RCP program is not required and does not
substitute for the New Jersey examination.
OA Plan
QA plans are required for all radon service operators in accordance with EPA and
State guidelines.
Education and/or Experience
Radon Measurement Specialist: A Bachelor's degree in a natural science, one year
radiation work experience, 6 months radon measurement experience. A certified
Health Physicist meets the degree and radiation work experience requirement.
Radon Measurement Technician: 6 months radon measurement work experience.
Radon Mitigation Specialist: Any combination of 5 years of college education
(curriculum in architecture, engineering, or HVAC studies) or work experience (the
design, construction, and renovation of buildings, and associated HVAC systems, or
design and installation of radon mitigation systems).
Radon Mitigation Technician: Two years experience in the building or construction
trades, including the HVAC trade.
Training and/or Examination Requirement
Radon Measurement Specialist: Complete a Department-approved course consisting of
at least 24 hours.
Radon Measurement Technician: Complete a Department-approved course consisting
of at least 16 hours.
Radon Mitigation Specialist: Complete a Department-approved course consisting of at
least 24 hours.
40
-------
NEW JERSEY (ConL)
Training and/or Examination Requirement (Cont)
Radon Mitigation Technician: Complete a Department-approved course consisting of
at least 16 hours.
Audits (Office and/or Site)
On-site audits are to be performed on a rotating basis every one to two years at the
radon measurement or mitigation location. In addition, there is inspection of radon
mitigation systems. On-site audits of radon laboratories are required for laboratory
certification.
User Fees
Besides application, examination, and annual certification fees, New Jersey has a
unique system of fees based on a sliding scale for the number of measurement devices
placed or the number of mitigations performed over a six-month period. The
following Tables A, B, and C provide details of these fees.
41
-------
NEW JERSEY CERTIFICATION FEE SCHEDULE A
Radon
Measurement
Business
Radon
Measurement
Specialist
Radon
Measurement
Technician
Radon
Mitigation
Business
Radon
Mitigation
Specialist
Radon
Mitigation
Technician
Initial
Course
Fee
N/A
200
ISO
N/A
200
ISO
Continuing
Education
Course Fee
N/A
135
SO
N/A
135
SO
Examination
Fee
N/A
200
150
N/A
200
150
Certification
Application
Fee
400
ISO
75
400
ISO
75
Annual
Re-Certification
Fee
200
75
50
200
75
50
•
Facility Inspection
Fee (ea. insp.)
400
N/A
N/A
400
N/A
N/A
* Fees are in dollars and non-refundable.
42
-------
NEW JERSEY FEE SCHEDULE B
••Program Administration Fees - Radon Measurement Business
Number of Measurement
Devices Employed Each
Semi-Annual Period*
-0-
1-49
50-99
100-199
200-299
300-499
500-999
1000-1999
2000-5000
Greater than 5000
Program
Fee(S)
[447]
[447]
[447]
[447]
[447]
[447]
[447]
[447]
[447]
[447]
318
318
318
318
318
318
318
318
318
318
Activity
Fee(S)
0
[49]
[145]
[290]
[484]
[775]
[1,454]
[2,909]
[6,790]
[9,700]
37
110
219
365
584
1,095
2,190
5,110
7300
Total
($)
[447]
[496]
[592]
[737]
[931]
[1,222]
[1,901]
[3356]
[7,237]
[10,147]
318
355
428
573
683
902
1,413
2,508
5,428
7,618
• First Calendar Period: July 1 - December 31
Second Calendar Period: January 1 - June 30
•• The figures will be adjusted up or down annually by the previous 12 month inflation factor. The inflation factor is based upon the United
States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics data published in the monthly CPI Detailed Report. The data will be taken from the most
recent report available on July 1 each year and the actual percentage used will be the past year percent change for the U.S. city average, all items,
all urban consumers.
[] Amounts found in proposed regulations.
43
-------
NEW JERSEY FEE SCHEDULE C
"Program Administration Fees - Radon Mitigation Business
Number of Buildings
Mitigated Each
Semi-Annual Period*
-0-
1-10
11-24
25-49
50-74
75-99
100-124
125-149
150-174
175-200
Greater than 200
Program
Fee($)
[746]
[746]
[746]
[746]
[716]
[746]
[746]
[746]
[746]
[746]
[746]
496
496
496
496
4%
4%
4%
496
4%
496
4%
Activity
Fee($)
0
1144]
[459]
[971]
[1,627]
[2,283]
[2,939]
[3,595]
[4,251]
[4,920]
[5,248]
77
276
568
951
1,335
1,716
2,102
2,485
2,869
3,068
Total
($)
[746]
[890]
[1,205]
[1,717]
[2373]
[3,029]
[3,685]
[4,341]
[4,997]
[5,666]
[5,994]
496
573
772
1,064
1,447
1,831
2,214
2,598
2,981
3,365
3,564
• First Calendar Period: July 1 - December 31
Second Calendar Period: January 1 - June 30
** The figures will be adjusted up or down annually by the previous 12 month inflation factor. The inflation factor is based upon the United
States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics data published in the monthly CPI Detailed Report. The data will be taken from the most
recent report available on July 1 each year and the actual percentage used will be the past year percent change for the U.S. city average, all items,
all urban consumers.
Q Amounts found in proposed regulations.
44
-------
OHIO (Licensing Program to be enacted January 1992)
Certification. Registration or Licensing
The State requires licenses for all radon testers, radon mitigation contractors, and radon mitigation
specialists. The State has the ability to approve laboratories and training. Licenses are for two-year
periods.
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
The licensing program requires RMP-listing.
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
The licensing program requires RCP-listing.
OA Plan
A QA plan must be submitted with the provider's application for licensing or certification.
Education and/or Experience
The State has a continuing education requirement
Training and/or Examination Requirement
Testers, mitigation contractors, and mitigation specialists must complete an approved training course
and pass examination.
Audits ("Office and/or Site!
The State may examine the records of measurement and mitigation operators to determine compliance
with State requirements.
User Fees
Fees are $800 for mitigation contractors and $600 for mitigation specialists.
PENNSYLVANIA
Certification. Registration or Licensing
A full certification program is in effect for all radon measurement and mitigation operators and firms.
All radon measurement firms, laboratories, and radon mitigation firms must have at least one certified
individual to obtain certification.
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
Measurement laboratories and measurement operators must be RMP-listed.
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
There is a State measurement proficiency requirement
45
-------
PENNSYLVANIA (Cont)
OA Plan
Measurement operators and laboratories are required to have a QA program. Measurement and
mitigation personnel are also required to follow EPA protocols and guidelines in carrying out their
respective activities.
Education and/or Experience
In addition to training and examination (see below), one year of professional experience in their
respective areas is required of all operators. For radon mitigators this experience can be substituted for
three years of experience in related professions, such as architecture, engineering or plumbing.
Laboratory staff can substitute this experience with a Health Physics certification, but must also have a
degree (or experience equivalent to a degree) in physical science or engineering.
Training and/or Examination Requirement
Measurement laboratory staff, measurement operators and mitigation contractors are required to take a
State-approved course in order to become certified. Measurement operators and mitigation contractors
must also pass a State-approved examination. State approval is given to the RCP examination, and the
examinations set by the States of Florida and New Jersey.
Audits (Office and/or Site)
The State may audit all certified individuals and firms to enforce compliance with State requirements.
User Fees
All applicants whether measurement operators, laboratories, or mitigators must pay an application fee
for certification. This is set at $200 for individual testers and mitigators, S250 for laboratory staff, and
$500 for all firms.
VIRGINIA
Federal and/or State Measurement Proficiency Requirement
All firms must be RMP-listed.
Federal and/or State Mitigation Proficiency Requirement
All firms must be RCP-listed.
46
-------
APPENDIX B
LIST OF STATE CONTACTS
ALABAMA
Division of Radiation Control
State Department of Public Health
434 Monroe Street, Room 510
Montgomery, AL 36130-1701
(205) 242-5315
ALASKA
State Department of Health and Social Services
Division of Public Health
P.O. Box H
Juneau, AK 99811-0610
(907) 465-3019
ARIZONA
State Radiation Regulatory Agency
4814 South 40th Street
Phoenix, AZ 85040
(602) 255-4845
ARKANSAS
Div. of Radiation Control & Emergency Mgrnt
State Department of Health
4815 West Markham Street
Little Rock, AR 72205-3867
(501) 661-2301
CALIFORNIA
State Department of Health Services
714 P Street, Room 600
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 322-2040
COLORADO
Radiation Control Division
State Department of Health
4210 East llth Avenue
Denver, CO 80220
(303) 331-8481
CONNECTICUT
Radon Program
Connecticut Department of Health Services
Hartford CT 06106-4474
(203) 566-3122
DEJJ.WARE
Office of Radiation Control
Division of Public Health
Delaware Bureau of Environmental Health
P.O. Box 637
Dover, DE 19901
(302) 739-3787
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
D.C DepL of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs
614 H Street, N.W., Room 1014
Washington, D.C 20001
(202) 727-7221
FLORIDA
Office of Radiation Control
Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services
1317 Winewood Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32499-0700
(904) 488-1525
GEORGIA
State Department of Human Resources
878 Peachtree Street, Room 100
Atlanta, GA 30309
(404)894-6644
GUAM
Guam Environmental Protection Agency
IT&E Harmon Plaza, D-107
130 Rojas Street
Harmon, Guam 96911
HAWAII
Radiation Branch
State Department of Health
591 Ala Moana Boulevard
Honolulu, HI 96813-2498
(808)548-4383
IDAHO
State Department of Health and Welfare
Bureau of Preventive Medicine
450 West State Street
Boise, ID 83720
(208)334-6584
47
-------
ILLINOIS
Illinois Department of Nuclear .Safety
1301 Knotts Street
Springfield, IL 62703
(217) 786-7126
INDIANA
Radiological Health Section
Indiana State Board of Health
1330 W. Michigan Street, P.O. Box 1964
Indianapolis, IN 46206
(317) 633-8563
IOWA
Bureau of Radiological Health
Iowa Department of Public Health
Lucas State Office Building
Des Moines, IA 50319-0075
(515) 281-7781
KANSAS
Radiation Control Program
Environmental Health Services
State Department of Health and Environment
109 SW 9th Street, 6th Fl, Mills Bldg
Topeka,KS 66612
(913) 296-1560
KENTUCKY
Radiation Control Branch
Division of Community Safety
Department of Health Services
Cabinet for Human Resources
275 East Main Street
Frankfort, KY 40621-0001
(502) 564-3700
LOUISIANA
Radiation Protection Division
State Department of Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 14690
Baton Rouge, LA 70898-4690
(504) 925-4518
MAINE
Indoor Air Program
Division of Health Engineering
Department of Health Services
State House, Station 10
Augusta, ME 04333
(207)289-5692
MARYLAND
Radiological Health Program
Maryland Department of the Environment
2500 Broening Highway
Baltimore, MD 21224
(301) 631-3300
MASSACHUSETTS
State Department of Public Health
Western MA Health Office
23 Service Center
Northampton, MA 01060
(413) 586-7525
MICHIGAN
Division of Radiological Health
Bur. of Environmental & Occupational Health
State Department of Public Health
3423 N. Logan Street/Martin L. King, Jr. Blvd.
P.O. Box 30195
Lansing, MI 48909
(517) 335-8190
MINNESOTA
State Indoor Air Quality Unit
925 Delaware Street, SE
P.O. Box 59040
Minneapolis, MN 55459-0040
(612) 627-5012
MISSISSIPPI
Division of Radiological Health
State Department of Health
3150 Lawson Street
P.O. Box 1700
Jackson, MS 39215-1700
(601) 354-6657
MISSOURI
Bureau of Radiological Health
State Department of Health
1730 East Elm, P.O. Box 570
Jefferson City, MO 65102
(314) 751-6083
MONTANA
Occupational Health Bureau
State Dept. of Health & Environmental Sciences
Cogswell Building A113
Helena, MT 59620
(406) 444-3671
48
-------
NEBRASKA
Division of Radiological Health
State Department of Health
301 Centennial Mall, South
P.O. Box 95007
Lincoln, NE 68509
(402) 471-2168
NEVADA
Radiological Health Section
State Health Division
505 East King Street, Room 203
Carson City, NV 89710
(702) 687-5394
NEW HAMPSHIRE
Bureau of Radiological Health
State Division of Public Health Services
Health & Welfare Bldg, Six Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03301
(603) 271-4674
NEW JERSEY
Radiation Protection Programs
Division of Environmental Quality
Department of Environmental Protection
CN 415, 729 Alexander Road
Trenton, NJ 08625-0145
(609)987-6389
NEW MEXICO
Radiation Licensing and Registration Section
State Environmental Improvement Division
1190 SL Francis Drive
Santa Fe, MM 87503
(505) 827-2948
NEW YORK
Bureau of Environmental Radiation Protection
State Health Department
Two University Place
Albany, NY 12203
(518) 458-6461
NORTH CAROLINA
Division of Radiation Protection
State Department of Environment, Health, and
Natural Resources
P.O. Box 27687
Raleigh, NC 27611-7687
(919) 571-4141
NORTH DAKOTA
Division of Environmental Engineering
State Department of Health
1200 Missouri Avenue, Room 304
P.O. Box 5520
Bismarck, ND 58502-5520
(701) 221-5188
OHIO
Radiological Health Program
Department of Health
246 North High Street, P.O. Box 118
Columbus, OH 432664)118
(614) 644-2727
OKLAHOMA
Radon Protection Division
State Department of Health
P.O. Box 53551
Oklahoma City, OK 73152
(405) 271-5221
OREGON
Department of Human Resources
State Health Division
1400 SW 5th Avenue
Portland, OR 97201
(503) 229-5797
PENNSYLVANIA
Pennsylvania Dept of Environmental Resources
Bureau of Radiation Protection
P.O. Box 2063
Harrisburg, PA 17120
(717) 787-2480
PUERTO RICO
Radiological Health Division
G.P.O. Call Box 70184
Rio Pierdras, Puerto Rico 00936
(809) 767-3563
RHODE ISLAND
Div. of Occupational and Radiological Health
State Department of Health
206 Cannon Building, 3 Capitol Hill
Providence, RI 02908
(401) 277-2438
49
-------
SOUTH CAROLINA
Bureau of Radiological Health.
State Dept of Health & Environmental Control
2600 Bull Street
Columbia, SC 29201
(803) 734-4700
SOUTH DAKOTA
State Department of Water and Natural
Resources
523 E. Capitol
Pierre, SD 57501
(605) 773-3351
TENNESSEE
State Department of Health and Environment
Division of Air Pollution Control
701 Broadway, 4th Floor
Nashville, TN 37247-3101
(615) 741-3651
TEXAS
Radiological Assessment Program
Bureau of Radiation Control
State Department of Health
1100 West 49th Street
Austin, TX 78756
(512) 835-7000
UTAH
Bureau of Radiation Control
State Department of Health
P.O. Box 16690, 288 North, 1460 West
Salt Lake City, UT 84116-0690
(801) 538-6734
VERMONT
Occupational & Radiological Health Operations
Division of Occupational & Radiological Health
State Department of Health
10 Baldwin Street, Administrative Bldg.
Montpelier, VT 05602
(802)828-2886
VIRGINIA
Bureau of Radiological Health
Department of Health
109 Governor Street, Room 916
Richmond, VA 23219
(804) 786-5932
VIRGIN ISLANDS
Contact the U.S. EPA, Region 2 in New York'
Mail Code 2AWM-RAD
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
(212) 264-4418
WASHINGTON
Division of Radiation Protection
State Department of Health
Airdustrial Building 5, LE-13
Olympia, WA 98504
(206) 753-4518
WEST VIRGINIA
Office of Environmental Health Services
Industrial Hygiene Division
State Bureau of Public Health
151 llth Avenue
South Charleston, WV 25303
(304) 348-3526
WISCONSIN
Radon Program, Radiation Protection Section
Division of Health
State Department of Health and Social Services
P.O. Box 309
Madison, WI 53701-0309
(608) 267-4795
WYOMING
Environmental Health Programs
.State Department of Health
Hathway Building, 4th Floor (Room 482)
Cheyenne, WY 82002-0710
(307) 777-6015
50
-------
List of Four Radon Regional Training. Centers
Southern Regional Radon Training Center
Auburn University (lead center),
University of Louisville, University of Tulsa, and Texas A&M
238 Harbert Engineering Center
Auburn University, AL 36849
(205) 8444370
Midwest Universities Radon Consortium
University of Minnesota (lead center),
University of Michigan, and Kansas State University
1985 Buford Avenue (240)
St. Paul, MN 55108-1101
(612) 624-5343
Eastern Regional Radon Training Center
Rutgers University
Radiation Science
Kilmer Campus, Bldg. 4087
New Brunswick, NJ 08903
(908) 932-2582
Western Regional Radon Training Center
Colorado State University
Department of Industrial Sciences
Fort Collins, CO 80523
(303) 491-7742
51
-------
REGIONAL OFFICES
Region 1
Radiation Program Manager, Region 1
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
John F. Kennedy Federal Building
Room 2311
Boston, MA 02203
(617) 565-4502
Regions
Radiation Program Manager, Region 5
(5AR26)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
230 S. Dearborn Street
Chicago, IL 60604
(312) 353-2206
Region!
Radiation Program Manager, Region 2
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Room 1137-L
26 Federal Plaza
New York, NY 10278
(212) 264-4110
Region3
Radiation Program Manager, Region 3
Special Program Section (2AM12)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
841 Chestnut Street
Philadelphia, PA 19107
(215) 597-8326
Region 6
Radiation Program Manager, Region 6
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Chief, Technical Section (6T-ET)
Air, Pesticides and Toxics Division
1445 Ross Avenue
Dallas, TX 75202-2733
(214) 655-7223
Region?
Radiation Program Manager, Region 7
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
726 Minnesota Avenue
Kansas City, KS 66101
(913) 551-7020
Region 4
Radiation Program Manager, Region 4
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
345 Courtland Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30365
(404) 347-1729
Region 8
Radiation Program Manager, Region 8
(8HWM-RP)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Suite 500
999 18th Street
Denver, CO 80202-2405
(303) 293-1713
52
------- |