FINAL REPORT
RCRA TECHNICAL DATA COLLECTION AND
TECHNICAL COMPLIANCE COST DEVELOPMENT
PR4I
Pope-Reid Associates Inc.- 533 St.Clair Ave., St. Paul, Minnesota ,55102
-------
FINAL REPORT
RCRA TECHNICAL DATA COLLECTION AND
TECHNICAL COMPLIANCE COST DEVELOPMENT
Prepared for:
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Analysis and Evaluation
Washington, D.C.
Submitted by:
Pope-Reid Associates Inc.
245 E. 6th Street
Suite 813
St. Paul, Minnesota 55101
Contract No. 68-01-6106
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1
APPLICATION OF TECHNICAL COSTS TO MODEL PLANTS 3
Model Plant Development 3
Technology Selection and Application of
Technical Requirements and Costs 5
Treatment/Disposal Technology Assignment 19
LIMITS TO THE ANALYSIS 25
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Code Sheets for Technical Requirements
and Treatment/Disposal Options
Appendix B: Details of Technical Cost Development
Appendix C: Time Estimates for the Closure of
- Landfills and Surface Impoundments
Appendix D: RCRA Waste Management Summary Sheets
-------
RCRA TECHNICAL DATA COLLECTION
AND TECHNICAL COMPLIANCE COST DEVELOPMENT
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The Resource- Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) is the first comprehen-
sive Federal legislation dealing with solid and hazardous waste. RCRA was enacted
to achieve the two basic objectives of protecting the public health and environ-
ment and conserving natural resources. Subtitle C of RCRA mandates that the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) promulgate regulations governing the
generation, storage, transportation, treatment, and disposal of hazardous wastes,
as well as the definition, identification, and listing of such wastes. EPA has
proposed Subtitle C regulations that establish the mechanism for "cradle-to-grave"
hazardous waste management by providing for:
• the identification and listing of hazardous wastes according to specific
criteria;
• standards for the operation and closing of hazardous waste treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities (including insurance and financial
requirements);
• permits for treatment, storage, and disposal facilities;
• a manifest system to monitor the movement of the waste from the generator
to ultimate disposal; and
• notification requirements for hazardous waste generators, transporters,
and treatment, storage, and disposal facilities.
The RCRA Subtitle C regulations were first proposed on December 18, 1978; the
first phase of the regulations to be promulgated was published in the Federal
Register on May 19, 1980. These promulgated regulations, called the Interim
Status Standards (ISS), consist primarily of non-technical requirements for such
items as manifests, security, recordkeeping/reporting, notification, permits,
and monitoring and testing. The technical requirements in the ISS are primarily
ones for closure, run-on/run-off control, and fence/controlled access. All off-
site (commercial) disposal is also considered to be technical in nature.
Accompanying the Interim Status Standards was a Preliminary Final Economic Impact
Analysis that was based on a January 1980 draft of the ISS. This report is being
finalized at the present time. As part of this economic impact analysis, several
-1-
-------
industries for which is appeared there would be a high potential for adverse
economic impact were studied in considerable detail. The industries (called
the "high-impact" industries) were Textiles, Leather Tanning and Finishing, Non-
ferrous Metal Smelting and Refining, Organic Chemicals, Inorganic Chemicals,
Uranium and Other Mining, and Electroplating.
EPA decided to study these industries by using Effluent Guidelines contractors
to collect data on each industry and to determine the economic impacts associated
with compliance with the ISS. Those Effluent Guidelines contractors that had
prepared or were preparing Development Documents for the industries in question
performed the data collection; they were known in the context of this study as
Technical Contractors. The Effluent Guidelines contractors who had been or
were in the process of preparing Economic Impact Analysis documents were called
the Economic Contractors; they determined the economic impacts of the ISS on
industry. The work done by these Technical and Economic Contractors was coor-
dinated and used by a Technical Coordinator and an Economic Coordinator to de-
velop technical and non-technical costs respectively, and to further assess the
economic impact of the proposed regulations. Pope-Reid Associates, Inc. (PRA),
as the Technical Coordinator, received all data collected by the Technical Con-
tractors; reviewed the data; determined the technical requirements for compliance;
developed unit technical costs of compliance with the ISS; and assigned the tech-
nical requirements to model plants in the high-impact industries. This was done
for each of the high-impact industries except Electroplating. For this industry,
PRA managed the data collection and review; the remaining work was done by the
Economic Contractor. The cost and technical requirement data prepared by PRA
were sent to Arthur D. Little, Inc. (ADL), the Economic Coordinator, who was
responsible for the assignment of technical costs to the appropriate technical
requirements; the preparation and assignment of non-technical costs; and the
generation of data for use by the Economic Contractors in determining economic
impacts.
The purpose of PRA's role of Technical Coordinator was to collect and review
data, develop technical costs, and apply technical requirements and costs to
plants in selected industries. The work discussed in this report is that done by
PRA with respect to the Interim Status Standards as proposed in January 1980 and
promulgated on May 19, 1980.
-2-
-------
APPLICATION OF TECHNICAL COSTS TO MODEL PLANTS
Model Plant Development
Data Collection
The data collection effort was initiated by acquainting each Technical Contractor
with the scope of the study and data needs at an orientation meeting. Data col-
lection forms and model plant data transmittal forms were provided to each con-
tractor.
The Technical Contractors were given the opportunity to revise their data collec-
tion forms to make them relate more specifically to the individual industries
being studied. Using the revised data collection forms, the Technical Contractors
surveyed the industries to obtain information on hazardous waste generation and
management. During the data collection process, frequent contact was maintained
with all Technical Contractors, and meetings were held with them as needed to dis-
cuss progress and find solutions to any problems they were encountering.
Model Plants
In conjunction with the Economic Contractors, the Technical Contractors developed
model plants to represent groups of plants in each industry. A model plant is a
hypothetical plant that is used to represent a group of plants with common charac-
teristics in an industry. Model plants are used to generate technical costs in-
formation for a group of facilities that differ slightly in size, process, or
configuration. The plant-specific data collected by the Technical Contractors
were aggregated, along with any other available information, to form model plant
data in each industry.
Data Review
Both plant-specific and model plant data were sent to PRA by the Technical Con-
tractors on the agreed-upon data forms. At PRA, the data forms were checked for
completeness and consistency; any questions that arose during this data check were
referred to the appropriate Technical Contractor for resolution. PRA also compared
the model plant data to information available from earlier studies, and differences
were explained by the Technical Contractors when possible.
-3-
-------
Some difficulties did arise in the areas of data review and quality control. The
response to the plant-specific surveys for some industries or industry segments
was very poor, making it difficult for the Technical Contractors to generate
model plant data. Where there was adequate industry response, there still may
have been data lacking because the industry respondent had no information with
which to answer some of the questions on the survey form. There were also prob-
lems with comparing the model plant data on waste generation rates and waste
amounts to data from earlier studies because the underlying assumptions in the
earlier studies were not always clearly delineated. However, in view of the
amount of data available on hazardous waste generation and management before this
data collection effort, it becomes evident that the existing data base was con-
siderably expanded. In fact, the data base developed for this study is very likely
the best currently available for the high-impact industries.
Approach
The generalized approach to this study, once the model plant data had been received
and reviewed by PRA, can be described in five steps:
1. Determine which wastes are to be considered hazardous and calculate the
amount of each waste generated in metric tons per year per plant
(.WT/yr-plt) for each model plant;
2. Determine, based on the Interim Status Standards, which treatment/
disposal technologies comply with the ISS and what ISS technical re-
quirements apply to each technology;
3. Develop a unit cost or costs of compliance with the ISS for each tech-
nical requirement;
4. For each model plant and waste stream, select the appropriate treatment/
disposal technology(ies), how many plants represented by the model use
each technology, and what combinations of technologies (for more than
one waste stream) go together; and
5. Using the unit technical costs developed in Step 3, calculate the tech-
nical cost of compliance with the ISS for each plant represented by the
model.
The Step 1 determination of which waste streams would be considered hazardous was
made by the Technical Contractors and PRA, in conjunction with EPA personnel.
The amount of waste was either given as model plant data by the Technical Con-
tractor or calculated by PRA from other types of model plant data (e.g., waste
-4-
-------
generation rate and production). The methodology for completing Steps 2 through
4 is described in later sections. Step 5 was not done by PRA; all necessary
model plant data, cost equations, and technology and technical requirement assign-
ments (from Steps 1 through 4) were provided to Arthur D. Little, Inc. and the
actual technical costs of compliance are being calculated at ADL.
Technology Selection^ and^ Application
of Technical Requirements and Costs
The underlying assumption in the selection of the hazardous waste management tech-
nologies to be assigned to plants represented by a model plant was that a genera-
tor would continue, during the period of interim status, to use the same waste
management practice(s) currently being employed. This assumption was set forth
by Office of Analysis and Evaluation (OAE) personnel as being representative of
reality in that interim status is a period during which existing facilities
that meet certain criteria will be regarded by EPA as being under permit while
the permit is being processed. The only exception to this assumption would
occur if the waste management practice in question was definitely out of compli-
ance with the Interim Status Standards, such as disposal of free liquids in an
unlined landfill or .landfill ing of drummed waste. PRA assessed each waste manage-
ment practice described in the model plant forms, and those that could not be
brought into compliance with the ISS regulations were eliminated. New, RCRA-
compliant waste management technologies were substituted to handle the waste
streams thus affected. Each potentially RCRA-compliant waste management option
shown to be used as current industry practice on the model plant forms was assigned
a number for future reference (see Appendix A for this list).
PRA found four principal sets of technical requirements that could be assigned
to waste treatment/disposal technologies in use by plants in a model to bring
these technologies into technical compliance with the ISS. They were requirements
for closure, run-on/run-off control, fence and controlled access, and operating
and maintenance costs (for sludge dewatering). In addition, off-site (commercial)
treatment/disposal was considered to be technical. Not all requirements apply to
all treatment/disposal technologies. Some technologies had no technical require-
ments; however, there may be non-technical requirements that will apply. A
summary of which technical requirements apply to each treatment/disposal tech-
nology is shown in Table 1. For ISS compliance costs to be determined, both
technical costs (discussed in this report) and non-technical costs (developed by
ADL) must be included.
-5-
-------
TABLE 1. Application of Technical
Waste Treatment/Disposal
Requirements
Options
to
Waste Treatment/Disposal
Code
Number
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Technology
On-site sanitary landfill
Off-site sanitary landfill
On-site open dump
On-site stockpile
On-site disposal surface impoundment
Plant does not generate hazardous
waste
On-site land treatment
Off-site land treatment
On-site incineration (no scrubber)
Off-site incineration (no scrubber)
Waste sent to POTW
Waste sold as soil conditioner
Off-site secure landfill
On-site secure landfill
On-site incineration (with scrubber)
Off-site incineration (with scrubber
Waste sent to solvent recovery
On-site tailings pond
On-site treatment/storage surface
impoundment
SI udge dewatering
Recycled on-site
Ocean disposal
Underground injection
Hydrolyzed
Burned as fuel
Steam stripped
Reprocessed/recycled off-site
Technical Requirements
None Closure
(00) (01)
X
xX(D
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Run-on/off Fence -
Control as needed
(02) (03)
X X
X X
X X
X
X X
X
X
Off-site On-site
only 0AM
(04) (05)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
x
X
X
(1) If the pile is managed as a landfill
-------
A discussion of each of these technical requirements, including off-site
treatment/disposal and on-site technologies that have no technical requirements,
fol 1 ows.
No Technical Requirements
For certain treatment/disposal technologies there are no technical requirements.
However, there will most likely be non-technical requirements associated with
these technologies if they are used for the management of hazardous waste. Most
of these technologies - recycling, hydrolyzing, burning as fuel, underground in-
jection, and steam stripping, for example - are on-site processes. Another dis-
posal technology - ocean disposal - is covered by different regulations, making
technical requirements under RCRA superfluous. Finally, there are no technical
requirements for individual plants that do not generate hazardous wastes, even
though other plants represented by the same model may generate such wastes.
Closure
Closure requirements, under the ISS apply to five types of on-site facilities:
incinerators, landfills (both secure and sanitary), land treatment, surface im-
poundments (disposal and treatment/storage), and tailings ponds. The closure
requirements for incinerators (both with and without scrubber) were determined
by Arthur D. Little, Inc. Assumptions regarding the distribution of plants using
various closure options are based on recommendations from EPA's Office of Solid
Waste (OSW).
The following sections - Landfills, Surface Impoundments, and Land Treatment
Facilities - describe the technical assumptions and specifications used in the
development of closure costs associated with the Interim Status Standards. The
design parameters for each of these disposal alternatives were specified by OSW
staff prior to the preparation of working designs and any technical costs. De-
tails of the technical cost development for each disposal option are provided
in Appendix B.
-7-
-------
Landfills. All on-site sanitary and secure landfills have applicable costs for
closure. There are two closure cost equations for landfills, one that incorpor-
ates naturally-occurring clay in the final cover and one that incorporates a
membrane in the cover. The cost equations for landfill closure are:
Y ($1000) = 0.174 (X0-575) (clay cover) (1)
Y ($1000) = 0.283 (X0-597) (membrane cover) (2)
where: Y = cost of closure in thousands of dollars;
X = waste amount in MT/yr
The preceding equations were developed by determining the technical costs asso-
ciated with the closure of landfills under the proposed ISS. A range of landfill
capacities was considered in developing the final cover specifications and costs.
The following annual capacities and design depths were used in this analysis:
Annual Capacity Design Depth (meters)
(metric tons) (cubic meters)
1,000 883 2
10,000 8,333 4
25,000 20,833 5
50,000 41,667 6
100,000 83,333 8
A conversion factor of 1.2 metric tons waste/cubic meter waste was used to deter-
mine the volume requirements of each landfill cell designed. It was assumed in
the landfill design that 70% of the available landfill cell capacity would be
used for the disposal of waste, while the remaining volume of 30% would be needed
for daily and final cover materials.
At the time of closure, the landfill cell is assumed to be filled with waste and
daily cover (soil) to its design depth, and the surface graded to a 5% slope.
Consequently, the surface of the cell would be suitably graded and compacted
prior to actual cover construction and application.
As mentioned before, landfill closure is accomplished using a final cover which
either incorporates on-site clay material or a synthetic membrane. In this
-8-
-------
analysis, it has been assumed that 50% of the landfills will close using the clay
design and 50% will use a membrane cover. This assumption was recommended by
OSW personnel, who used it in their closure scenario. Both cover designs possess
a one-foot-thick base of on-site compacted soil, which serves as a stabilizing
base for the application of the clay or membrane cover.
Naturally-occurring, on-site clay soil is applied and compacted to a depth of one
foot. In this design, the clay soil is assumed to exist on the facility site and
is excavated, placed, and compacted on the landfill cell. A two-foot cover of
on-site soil is then applied and compacted over the clay soil layer.
The use of a synthetic membrane in the cover requires the placement of a six-
inch layer of fine sand on the soil base, and an additional six-inch layer of
sand on top of the membrane liner. The membrane, which consists of 20 mil PVC
fabric, is thus "sandwiched" between these two buffer layers of sand. The bottom
layer of sand prevents any punctures or tears in the liner and also acts as a
drainage layer for water which may pool on the liner surface. A two-foot cover
of on-site soil is placed and compacted over the upper sand layer.
Both landfill cover .designs, clay and membrane, incorporate a perimeter trench
for the collection and disposal of water passing through the upper soil layer.
This ditch consists of a vitrified clay pipe which is situated directly above
either the clay or membrane liner. Any water standing on the liner is drained
from the cover via this system. In addition, the upper soil layer is revegetated
in both designs.
Engineering and contingency fees, each 10% of the material and labor costs, were
included in both closure cost estimates. Equations (1) and (2) were developed
by expressing annual waste capacity (in metric tons) with total capital dollars
expended in the year closure occurs. All costs are reported in 1st Quarter
1980 dollars.
Surface Impoundments. The two costs for closure of surface impoundments are sim-
ilar to those for landfills in that one incorporates clay and the other a membrane
in the cover. The costs apply to both treatment/storage and disposal surface
impoundments and to tailings ponds (a type of disposal impoundment). The assumed
-9-
-------
distribution (from OSW's closure scenario) regarding the types of closure cover
is 75% using clay and 25% using membrane. Because tailings ponds are generally
very large and closure costs would consequently be quite high, the use of a cost
ceiling has been considered. The figure at which this ceiling would be set is
as yet undecided. The two closure costs are:
Y ($1000) = 60.48 (X0-982) (clay cover) (3)
Y ($1000) = 101.01 (X0-947) (membrane cover) (4)
where: Y = cost of closure in thousands of dollars;
X = area of surface impoundment in acres.
When there is more than one surface impoundment per plant, it is intended that
the closure costs be calculated for each impoundment separately and then added
together.
Cost equations (3) and (4) were developed by determining the technical costs
associated with the closure of surface impoundments under the proposed ISS. As
with landfills, a range of surface impoundment sizes was considered in preparing
the final cover specifications and costs. The following surface impoundment
capacities, specified as surface area, and operating depths were used in the
analysis:
Surface Area (acres) Operating Depth (meters)
0.25 2
1.00 2
2.50 3
5.00 3
10.00 4
25.00 4
The operating depth of a surface impoundment is the depth at which the water level
remains during normal operating conditions. It is at this level that the capacity,
or operating surface area (in acres), of the impoundment is determined. Above the
normal water level is one meter of freeboard to prevent wastewater from escaping
the impoundment during adverse operating conditions, plant emergencies, or storm
events.
-10-
-------
At the time of closure, the surface impoundment is assumed to be filled with
stable, workable sludge to 50% of its original design volume. The impoundment's
dikes (sides) must then be plowed into the impoundment and graded to a 3% slope
before the actual cover construction can begin.
The final cover for a surface impoundment also incorporates either a clay liner
or synthetic membrane liner, as it did in the closure designs for landfills.
There are no differences in the cover design specifications between landfills and
surface impoundments that elect to close using a clay liner in the final cover.
The same is also true between landfills and surface impoundments that choose a
synthetic membrane as their final cover. Quantities of cover material, of
course, do vary between landfills and surface impoundments due to differences
in size and construction techniques. This results in the variation between the
cost equations that represent each facility's closure costs.
Engineering and contingency fees, each 10% of the material and labor costs, were
also included in both closure cost estimates. Equations (3) and (4) were de-
veloped by expressing operating surface area (in acres) with total capital dollars
expended. All costs are reported in 1st Quarter 1980 dollars.
Land Treatment Facilities. The two closure costs associated with on-site land
treatment facilities are:
Y ($) = 2.50 X (5)
Y ($) = 81.25 X (6)
Where: Y = cost of closure in dollars;
X = waste amount in MT/yr.
The cost given in Equation (5) is the one that applies to most of the land treat-
ment facilities; this represents a revegetation cost. Equation (6) gives the
closure cost for those facilities that, becuase of contaminated soil, must remove
the top eight inches of soil from the land treatment facility and dispose of the
soil as a hazardous waste. OSW staff recommended that PRA assume that 10% of
the land treatment facilities will need to close in this manner.
To determine the technical costs associated with the closure of land treatment
facilities, it was necessary to select a waste application rate, on an acre basis,
that would be typical of land treatment disposal. Based on background data and
-11-
-------
recommendations from EPA's Office of Solid Waste, an application rate of 800
metric tons/acre/year was selected.
In those facilities which contain contaminated soil (an assumed 10% of the faci-
lities), the contaminated material must be excavated, transported, and disposed
of as a hazardous waste. The cost for transportation is $12.50/MT, and the
disposal cost is $30.50/MT. Once the soil has been removed, the site is graded
and revegetated. An engineering fee of 7% and a contingency of 10% was added
to the cost of performing this closure procedure.
As specified by OSW staff, the upper eight inches of soil would be removed from
a contaminated facility. The total cost to remove and dispose of the waste and
re-landscape the facility is estimated to be $65,000/acre. At the application
rate of 800 MT/acre, the resulting cost is $81.25/MT.
In those facilities which do not contain any contaminated soil at the time of
closure (90% of the cases), revegetation of the site is the only technical cost
requirement. At $2000/acre for revegetation, and the same application rate, the
cost for these facilities is $2.50/MT.
Other Technical Requirements and Costs
Additional technical requirements and costs are incurred by specific disposal
facilities as a result of the proposed ISS. The following two requirements -
run-off/run-on control and fence/controlled access - were examined by ADL staff,
compliance designs prepared, and cost estimates developed. The two sections be-
low describe these technical requirements and the cost equations submitted by
ADL for our review.
Run-On/Run-Off Control. There is a requirement for run-on/run-off control tech-
nology for on-site secure and sanitary landfills and land treatment facilities.
Included as landfills are open dumps and waste piles. Little data have been
collected thus far on the percent of facilities with run-on/run-off control.
Scenarios developed by OSW assumed that all land treatment facilities have run-on/
run-off control technology in place and that no landfills or waste piles have it.
Because no hard data were available, OSW told PRA to use these assumptions. No
other types of facilities are required to have run-on/run-off control. The equa-
tion for calculating the cost of run-on/run-off control is:
-12-
-------
Y ($) = 3,100 + 304.3 (x°-3255) (7)
where: Y = cost of run-on/run-off control in dollars;
X = waste amount in MT/yr.
Fence/Controlled Access. The need for a fence and controlled access is included
in the RCRA regulations under the broader heading of "Security". The fence is
the only part of the security requirement that is considered technical, so the
fence, although it is a technical requirement, is considered to be part of the
non-technical security requirements in the development of costs. The existence
of a fence at a facility is part of the technical description, so PRA did the
assignment (as needed) of the fence requirement to a waste treatment/disposal
technology. A hazardous waste treatment/disposal facility is considered to be
fenced if it is part of a larger plant area that is fenced. A fence and con-
trolled access is required for incinerators, secure and sanitary landfills (in-
cluding waste piles and open dumps), land treatment facilities, and surface im-
poundments (including tailings ponds). It has been assumed that all incinerators
and land treatment facilities have a fence and controlled access or the equivalent.
Data on the present use of fences for on-site landfills and surface impoundments
by various industries were obtained from industry sources or the judgment of
people familiar with, the industry. If there was more than one surface impoundment
at a plant, the fence requirement was applied to each impoundment separately for
the purpose of calculating costs. The need for a fence and controlled access did
not occur very frequently, except in the Leather Tanning and Nonferrous industries.
Therefore, when a fence was required for more than one technology used by a model
plant, an effort was made to apply all technologies having fence requirements
to a single group of plants represented by the model. The cost equations for a
fence and controlled access for landfills and surface impoundments are:
Y ($) = 325 + 540.9 (x°-3255) (landfill) (8)
Y ($) = 325 + 10,018.1 (Z°*5) (surface impoundment) (9)
where: Y = cost of fence and controlled access in dollars;
X = waste amount in MT/yr;
Z = surface area of impoundment in acres.
Operating and Maintenance
One operating and maintenance requirement for RCRA compliance has been included
-13-
-------
in this study - for sludge dewatering. This was considered to be an incremental
0 & M requirement to improve the performance of existing equipment. The percent
solids for each waste stream was included as part of each set of data for a
model plant. The baseline situation in this study, given by OAE personnel, was
with BAT or PSES in place, including any sludge dewatering to meet these regula-
tions. Sludge dewatering would still be required under RCRA if, with BAT or
PSES dewatering in place, the sludge contained free liquids. This was assumed
to be the case for the high-impact industries in this study if a biological
sludge contained less than 20% solids or an inorganic sludge contained less than
40% solids. Different cut-off points may be selected for other industries,
depending on the nature of the sludge; the assignment of technical requirements
would remain the same. Although it is not the case that BAT and PSES are currently
in place in the high-impact industries, the technologies used and sludge amounts
generated under BAT/PSES could be quite accurately estimated because the Effluent
Guidelines contractors doing the BAT/PSES studies were the Technical Contractors
who collected RCRA data.
The general guidelines used in this study for RCRA-compliant disposal of sludge
allow wet (underwatered) sludge to be disposed in: on-site land treatment facili-
ties; on-site disposal surface impoundments; on-site secure landfills that are
lined and have a leachate collection/removal system; and off-site secure land-
fills (liner and leachate collection/removal system assumed). Disposal of wet
sludge in any type of facility would also be permissible if, when the sludge is
combined with other wastes for disposal in the same facility, the total waste
disposed is non-flowing. The off-site disposal of wet sludge may be prohibitively
expensive due to the high cost of transportation and disposing a large volume of
waste that is primarily water. Under the assumptions used in this study, however,
off-site secure landfill disposal of wet sludge is in compliance with the ISS.
The cost for sludge dewatering is considered to be an incremental cost to improve
the performance of dewatering equipment that would be present with BAT/PSES
technology in place. It is applied as a constant cost per metric ton of wet or
dewatered sludge. This cost was developed by Arthur D. Little, Inc.
Off-Site Disposal
The off-site (commercial) disposal of hazardous waste is considered to be technical
in nature, although it is not a technical requirement. In the application of costs,
-14-
-------
off-site disposal is treated as a technical cost; it includes both the costs
to dispose at the facility and transportation. The principal assumption made
concerning off-site facilities was that off-site secure landfills are lined and
have leachate collection and removal systems. All off-site disposal costs were
developed by ADL personnel. These costs must be included, along with the other
technical costs and the non-technical costs, in any estimate of the cost of
compliance with the ISS.
Closure Time Estimates
The proposed Interim Status Standards specify that all closure activities must
be completed in accordance with an approved closure plan within six months of
receiving the final volume of wastes. The feasibility of this six-month allow-
ance for the closure of facilities under the proposed ISS regulations was investi-
ated for the Office of Solid Waste. The study focused on developing the time
estimates for the closure of surface impoundments and landfills in accordance
with the requirements of the full status standards proposed in September 1979.
The closure of containers, tanks, and incinerators should, under normal operating
conditions, not require longer than six months to complete. Landfills and sur-
face impoundments, however, will require time extensions in the closure plan for
a number of circumstances. The results of the analysis have been included in
this report, and can be found in Appendix C.
Technical Design Variations - Landfills
In an effort to determine whether there is any existing bias in the unit costs
of landfills based on their size, two new landfill capacities were designed and
their costs estimated. These designs were prepared in compliance with the
September 4, 1979 draft of the RCRA regulations and represent probable extremes
in landfill capacity.
Cost estimates were developed for landfills with operating depths of two and
eight meters and with volumes of 200 MT/year and 500,000 MT/year, respectively.
Each design was for an on-site facility. From the costs reported in Table 2,
and represented graphically in Figure 1, it appears that the unit cost for large
facilities approaches a minimum cost of approximately $25.00/MT. This is probably
-15-
-------
a function of the operating depth of the landfill cell. At a depth of six meters
and greater (up to 8 meters) landfills of large capacities can be constructed
using less land than similar landfills with shallower depths. Hence, this will
tend to reduce the facility costs as costs for larger capacities are developed.
TABLE 2: SECURE LANDFILL DISPOSAL COSTS
SECURE LANDFILL: SUBURBAN LOCATION
CAPACITY (MT/YR) ON-SITE COST ($/MT) OFF-SITE COST ($/MT)
200 350 *
1,200 148 319
7,200 64 88
24,000 41 50
60,000 * 36
500,000 25 *
*Costs were not developed for these cases because they were not part of the ori-
ginal secure landfill cost development. The costs that were developed for these
sizes were done later at the request of EPA.
In considering the very small landfills (e.g., less than 1000 MT/yr) it is diffi-
cult to draw conclusive results from the data. At the 200 MT/yr capacity, the
maximum operating depth appears to be two meters. At depths greater than two
meters, the size of the cell would be prohibitively small (in order to maintain
this capacity). Although the capital cost for the 200 MT/yr facility is rela-
tively small, the unit costs are considerable due to its limited capacity. The
data may also be misleading in that at the 1200 MT/yr facility, the operating
depth is six meters. It is difficult to compare these cost estimates with those
developed at 200 MT/yr with its shallow depth of two meters.
Waste Containerization
PRA conducted a telephone survey of facilities that currently accept hazardous
-16-
-------
• si GAR : 521
ITY'dC 5 CYCLES X 70 DIVISIONS KADI 1* II. I. A.
KIUFFCL » ESSER CO.
-------
wastes to determine the costs for disposing drummed and bulk wastes. Nine state
pollution control agencies were contacted to obtain the names of approved facili-
ties that accept hazardous wastes for disposal. Eighteen disposal facilities
were contacted and the facility operators were asked about the prices charged
for waste disposal (excluding transportation). Facilities in various parts of
the United States were contacted in order to get data on the range of costs
incurred by plants in all geographical areas.
The responses PRA received varied from unwillingness to participate in the survey
to giving us the requested price information. Some facility operators did not want
to give out information over the telephone; some felt that their disposal prices
were so variable (based on the waste and its constituents) that they could not
provide data that were meaningful. Six facilities provided information; this is
summarized in Table 3.
TABLE 3: SUMMARY OF DATA COLLECTED ON WASTE DISPOSAL COSTS
Facility
1
2
3
4
5
6
State
KS
MO
CA
CA
NY
NY
Disposal Costs - $/h
(Excluding Transports
Drummed Waste
Liquid: $26.40-42.00
Solid: $48.00-64.00
Solid: $72.00-80.00
$60.00
Liquid: $11.60-16.80
Solid: $70.00-180.00
$74.00
Solid: $96.00-320.00
IT
tion)
Bulk Waste
$27.00-32.00 (sludge)
$35.00-43.00 (sludge)
Liquid: $12.60
Solid: $43.50-65.00
$66.00 (sludge)
$66.00-88.00 (sludge)
Comments
Price reflects waste
constituents and what
must be done to the
waste prior to disposal
Operator feels that
prices will probably
double when RCRA Sub-
title C regulations
are implemented.
Sludge disposal cost
depends on amount of
pre-disposal treat-
ment needed.
-------
As is evident from the data in Table 3, hazardous waste disposal prices are ex-
tremely variable. Although no substantial conclusions can be drawn from this
rather limited data base, Table 3 does give an indication of current disposal
prices at secure landfills.
Another aspect of this study of waste container!zation was the determination of
which wastes generated by the high-impact industries would likely be containerized
by a plant in compliance with the RCRA regulations. Any of the high-impact
industry wastes considered to be potentially hazardous could be containerized
for disposal. However, large amounts of nonflowing waste (such as sludge) would
most likely be disposed in bulk. Unless they are generated in very large amounts
(making transportation by tank truck cost-effective), liquid wastes would probably
be containerized for disposal.
Under the Interim Status Standards promulgated on May 19, 1980, however, drums
(empty or full) may not be disposed in any type of landfill. This is to prevent
the eventual corrosion of the drums that may result in slumping and disturbance
of the final cover. Thus, although small amounts of solid waste and most liquid
wastes may still be containerized for transportation to an off-site disposal
facility, they must.be disposed in bulk form. Bulk liquid waste may be landfilled
if the landfill has a liner that is chemically and physically resistant to the
liquid, and if the landfill also has a functioning leachate collection and re-
moval system capable of handling all leachate produced.
Treatment/Disposal Technology Assignment
The assignment of treatment/disposal technologies that would be in compliance
with the ISS to plants in (or represented by) a model plant (Step 4) was done
on an industry-specific basis for six of the high-impact industries. As men-
tioned earlier, the underlying assumption in this assignment procedure was that
a generator would continue to use the same waste management practice(s) under
the Interim Status Standards as are currently being used, unless practice(s)
would definitely be out of compliance with the ISS regulations. To generalize
the procedure, the percentage of plants using a given waste management practice
was taken from the model plant data form and was applied to the number of plants
in that model. Thus, each set of plants represented by a model was indicative
of the variety of current practice waste management technologies that was
described on the model plant data form.
-19-
-------
For the purpose of technology assignment, surface impoundments were separated
into two types - disposal and treatment/storage. Disposal impoundments included
tailings ponds, sludge lagoons, and other surface impoundments in which the solid
wastes would likely remain at closure. Treatment/storage surface impoundments
are those facilities used primarily for the treatment and/or storage of waste-
water; if the water in these impoundments contains priority pollutants, the im-
poundments were included in the RCRA costing. Such impoundments included
biological wastewater treatment lagoons, holding ponds, and polishing ponds.
The underlying assumption concerning treatment/storage impoundments was that the
solid wastes in them would be dredged at regular intervals (for proper operation
under BPT or BAT - not a RCRA-induced cost) and that the dredged sludge would be
disposed on-or off-site with any other sludge in a RCRA-compliant facility (the
sludge disposal was a RCRA-induced cost).
The method used for integrating treatment/storage surface impoundments into the
model plants and combining them with disposal technologies varied from industry
to industry. It was done in as plant-specific a way as possible, based on
available data and the Technical Contractors' knowledge of the industries.
Upon completion of the assignment of waste management technologies and treatment/
storage surface impoundments to model plants, the applicable technical require-
ments (from Table 1) were listed for each technology. This information was
summarized on RCRA Waste Management Summary sheets; these were sent, along with
equations for the technical costs developed by PRA, to Arthur D. Little, Inc.
for the calculation of the technical and non-technical costs. A copy of each
of these waste management summary sheets can be found in Appendix D.
The following sections describe, by industry, the method and assumptions under-
lying the assignment of waste disposal technologies and treatment/storage surface
impoundments.
Inorganic Chemicals
Determination of current practice and the assignment of waste management tech-
nologies to model plants was done by PRA on a plant-specific basis for the Titanium
Dioxide and Sodium Dichromate subcategories. This was possible because there were
relatively few plants in each model and enough plant-specific survey forms were
available for use in characterizing current practice. In the Chlor-Alkalai and
-20-
-------
and Chrome Pigments subcategories the model plant data were used to establish
current practice; additional information was obtained from the plant-specific
surveys when possible. Because both the plant-specific and model plant data
for the Chlor-Alkalai subcategory were very limited, it was necessary for PRA
to make some assumptions concerning which waste management technologies were
generally used together. In making these assumptions, a consistent method was
selected and used for the two segments of this subcategory. In this industry,
10% of the plants were indicated on the model plant forms as needing a fence
and controlled access.
Sludge dewatering was included for all subcategories except Chlorine-Mercury
Cell Process and Chrome Pigments. The latter subcategory produces a wastewater
treatment sludge that is 35% solids; the Technical Contractor felt that the
sludge would be non-flowing at that solids content. The criteria used to deter-
mine the need for sludge dewatering were those described earlier in the section
entitled "Operating and Maintenance".
The data used to describe surface impoundments in terms of surface area, number
of plants with impoundments, and number of impoundments per plant were obtained
from the Technical Contractor. In most cases, it was assumed that if a generator
was using surface impoundments for disposal of most or all of the waste, all
surface impoundments at that plant were disposal impoundments. Any exceptions
to this were made in cases where there was either a large number of surface im-
poundments per plant or a small portion of the waste was going to a disposal im-
poundment. Integration of treatment/storage surface impoundments with other
disposal technologies was done by assigning each disposal technology a plant with
treatment/storage impoundments until all plants having surface impoundments had
been accounted for. This was facilitated by the fact that all Titanium Dioxide
and Chrome Pigments plants have surface impoundments and that the impoundments
in the Sodium Dichromate subcategory could be assigned on a plant-specific basis.
Leather Tanning and Finishing
The assignment of waste management technologies to model plants in the Leather
Tanning industry was done by the Technical Contractor and provided to PRA. When
more than one waste stream was described as being sent to the same type of dis-
posal facility, it was assumed that the wastes were disposed together. Information
-21-
-------
on facilities needing a fence and controlled access was also provided on a
model plant basis by the Technical Contractor. Criteria used to determine the
need for sludge dewatering (from 4% solids to 30% solids) were those described
earlier in the "Operating and Maintenance" section. The integration of treatment/
storage surface impoundments into the model plants was done on a plant-specific
basis, based on the Technical Contractor's knowledge of the industry.
Metals Mining
This industry group originally included uranium mines as well as the metals mines.
No RCRA-related work was done on model plants for uranium mines, however, because
the uranium mining waste is covered under other regulations than RCRA.
The only waste in the Metals Mining industry considered potentially hazardous
under the Interim Status Standards was tailings, which are disposed entirely in
on-site tailings ponds. Tailings ponds were considered to be a type of disposal
surface impoundment, with all appropriate technical requirements for this type
of facility applying. The need for a fence was indicated in data provided by
the Technical Contractor. There were no treatment/storage surface impoundments
in the industry that, qualified for coverage under RCRA.
Nonferrous Metal Smelting and Refining
The assignment of waste management technologies to model plants was based on the
information in the model plant data form and some additional information from
the Technical Contractor. Most of the wastes considered to be potentially hazard-
ous under the ISS are those that are open-dumped on-site or sent to off-site
sanitary landfills. The disposal of wastes in stockpiles (as indicated on the
model plant forms) is primarily done with slag-type wastes, which are not listed
by EPA as potentially hazardous. The use of off-site disposal facilities by
primary metals plants was based on the 20% use of off-site facilities indicated
on the model plant forms. The model plant forms also indicated that 14% of the
secondary metals plants use on-site disposal; this was expressed in the tech-
nology assignment procedure as one of the disposal methods for sludge from plants
in the Secondary Lead with Battery Cracking subcategory. This distribution of
off- and on-site disposal in primary and secondary metals plants was described
by the Technical Contractor as the one most reflective of current industry practice.
The need for a fence and controlled access was included in the data on the model
plant forms.
-22-
-------
All of the surface impoundments used in the Nonferrous Smelting and Refining
industry that would potentially be affected by RCRA are treatment/storage sur-
face impoundments. The number of plants with impoundments and the number of
impoundments per plant were taken directly from data provided by the Technical
Contractor. The plants with surface impoundments were integrated with the dis-
posal technologies by first assigning surface impoundments to the plants using
on-site disposal technologies. This was assumed to be closest to industry prac-
tice because the number of plants with treatment/storage surface impoundments
was very close to the number of plants located in rural areas, where land for
on-site disposal and impoundments would be available. Any remaining plants with
surface impoundments were then assigned to those using off-site disposal tech-
nologies.
Organic Chemicals
The assignment of waste management technologies and treatment/storage surface
impoundments was done using the data on the model plant forms and supplementary
waste management technology and surface impoundment data provided by the Tech-
nical Contractor. No disposal surface impoundments are in use by the segments of
the industry that were studied.
Textiles
Current practice in the Textiles industry was not described on a model plant
basis by the Technical Contractor because there were not sufficient data. Waste-
water treatment sludge disposal was described for direct and indirect dischargers,
and information on disposal practices for solvents was taken from the plant-
specific survey forms. Approximately 15% of the plants responding to the Tech-
nical Contractor's survey indicated that they generated solvents; this percentage
was applied to the plants in each model. It was also assumed that solvents and
sludge were generated independently of each other, and that sludge from the Wool
Scouring, Nonwoven, and Felted Fabric subcategories was not hazardous. The
plants in each model were assigned disposal technologies in proportion to the
overall use of the technologies in the industry. All solvent wastes were assigned
to off-site secure landfills, because none of the sanitary landfills described
in the model plant forms was lined. Some adjustments to the number of plants in
a model using a given disposal technology were made to accomodate disposal sur-
-23-
-------
face impoundments when data from the Technical Contractor indicated that they
are used. Criteria used to determine the need for sludge dewatering (from 2.5%
solids to 20% solids) are those given in the earlier section on operating and
maintenance requirements.
The integration of plants with treatment/storage surface impoundments with the
disposal technology assignment was a two-step process; the data on number of
plants in a subcategory and number of impoundments per plant were provided by
the Technical Contractor. The first step was to assign to a plant currently
using a disposal impoundment the appropriate number of treatment/storage im-
poundments to make up the full complement of surface impoundments per plant for
a given subcategory. The second step was to assign a full complement of treat-
ment/disposal surface impoundments to each of the remaining groups of plants
within the model having a distinct waste management technology (or technologies)
starting with the group with the greatest number of plants in it to the one with
the least. This was repeated until all complements of treatment/storage surface
impoundments had been allocated. It was assumed that those subcategories in
which the sludge was not hazardous did not have treatment/storage surface
impoundments that needed to be regulated under RCRA.
-24-
-------
LIMITS TO THE ANALYSIS
The primary purpose of this study was to provide technical cost and technology
assignment data to Arthur D. Little, Inc. for use in an Economic Impact Assess-
ment of the ISS regulations. In addition, several brief, related studies (e.g.,
closure time estimates, landfill design variations, waste containerization) were
undertaken at EPA request. This report, therefore, describes what was done by
PRA in the context of the entire ElA project. The study was limited to some ex-
tent by both time and data constraints, and some overall assumptions had to be
made that may not have been entirely reflective of reality. A summary of the
major limitations and assumptions follows:
t The assumption that a facility will continue its current disposal
practice under the ISS may not be entirely accurate, in that some
facilities may incur a substantial increase in disposal cost.if
current practice is maintained. A least-cost method could not be
used, however, because total ISS compliance costs were not available
in time to use them in the waste management technology assignment
decisions.
0 The baseline situation with regard to sludge amounts and characteris-
tics was ?ssumed to be with BAT and PSES in place; although it is recog-
nized that this is not the case for all plants.
• For some high-impact industries or industry segments, the response
to the surveys was very poor; this resulted in difficulties for the
Technical Contractor when model plant data were developed.
t Some of the information needed for this study was unavailable because
the facility owner/operator did not have the information that was
requested. Testing sludges for their potentially hazardous constitu-
ents, for example, has been done by very few sludge generators. Gen-
eration rates for many wastes were based on limited and highly variable
data.
-25-
-------
APPENDICES
.Appendix A: Code Sheets for Technical Requirements
and Treatment/Disposal Options
Appendix B: Details of Technical Cost Development
Appendix C: Time Estimates for the Closure of Land-
fills and Surface Impoundments
.Appendix D: RCRA Waste Management Summary Sheets
-------
APPENDIX A
TECHNICAL RHQUIREMENT CODES - ISS
00 - No Technical requirements
01 - Closure (on-site facilities) applies to:
incinerators
landfills
land treatment
surface impoundments
tailings ponds
02 - Run-off/run-on control (on-site facilities) applies to:
landfills
03 - Fence (on-site facilities) applies, as needed, to:
incinerators
landfills
surface impoundments
tailings ponds
04 - Applicable off-site costs
05 - Applicable on-site O&M cost applies to:
dewatering of sludge
A-l
-------
DISPOSAL OPTION CODES - CURRENT PRACTICE (ISS)
01 - On-site sanitary landfill
02 - Off-site sanitary landfill
03 - On-site open dump (treat as sanitary landfill)
04 - On-site stockpile (treat as sanitary landfill)
05 - On-site disposal surface impoundment
06 - Plant does not generate hazardous waste
07 - On-site land treatment
08 - Off-site land treatment
09 - On-site incineration (no scrubber)
10 - Off-site incineration (no scrubber)
11 - Waste sent to POTW (off-site)
12 - Waste sold as soil conditioner (off-site)
13 - Off-site secure landfill
14 - On-site secure landfill
15 - On-site incineration (with scrubber)
16 - Off-site incineration (with scrubber)
17 - Waste sent to solvent recovery (off-site)
18 - On-site tailings pond
19 - On-site treatment/storage surface impoundment
20 - Sludge dewatering (on-site O&M cost)
21 - Recycled on-site
22 - Ocean disposal
23 - Underground injection
24 - Hydrolyzed
25 - Burned as fuel
26 - Steam stripped
27 - Reprocessed or recycled off-site
A-2
-------
28 - Waste sold as by-product
29 - Sold to Tenderer
A-3
-------
APPENDIX B
DETAILS OF TECHNICAL COST DEVELOPMENT
I. LANDFILL DESIGN
A. Range of Operating Sizes and Depths
Annual Capacity
Metric Tons Cubic Meters
1,000 833
10,000 8,333
25,000 20,833
50,000 41,667
100,000 83,333
B. Design Assumptions
Operating Depth
Meters
2
4
5
6
8
1. 1.2 metric tons of waste per cubic meter (m ) volume of waste
2. side slopes are 2:1 (run: rise)
3. bottom dimensions are square
4. existing bottom and side liner thickness is one meter
5. landfill capacity designed for 70% waste volume and 30% cover materials
6. final cover dimensions allow for cover over cell and liner sides
7. all soil and clay soil materials for clay cover are obtained on-site
8. sand needed for synthetic membrane cover is obtianed off-site
9. each landfill cell has been filled with waste and daily cover and
then graded to a slope of 5% before final cover application
10. engineering fee of 10% includes permit application, design, and certi-
fication fees
C. Dimensional Calculations
J
2h
1. Assumptions: a=b, 2h=a=b, and w=l
a = b = corner dimension
w = bottom width
1 = bottom length
h = operating height
2. Volume = (h^wa) + (h-l-b) + (h-w-1) + 4/3 (h-a-b) = 2(h-w-a) +
(h-w2) + 4/3 (h-a2)
3. Top cover dimension: w + (2-2h) and 1 + (2-2h)
4. Examples: h=2m Therefore, 2h=a=b=4m
w=21m
l=21m
B-l
-------
o Volume = 2 (2-21-4) + (2-212) + 4/3 (2-42) = 1261m3
Top cover dimension: h = 2m + 1m (existing liner) = 3m
Therefore, 2h=a=b=6m
9 Top cover dimension = 21 + (2-6) and 21 + (2-6) = 33m by 33m
B-2
-------
D. Costs: Landfill Design #1 (Clay)
Sizes in Thousand MT's
Component
1. Stabilizing base of soil
- cut, spread, and compact
@ $3.00/m3
2. Compacted clay liner
- excavate, spread, and
compact @ $3.50/n3
3. Soil cover
- cut, spread, and compact
G> $3.00/mJ
4. Perimeter collection ditch
- trench and pipe @ $18.00/m
5. Revegetation @ $1000/acre
6. Engineering @ 10%
7. Sub-total
8. Contingency @ 10%
9. TOTAL
($1,000)
1
408
1,224
408
1,428
817
10
1,683
5,049
1,683
5,891
3,367
25
3,105
9,315
3,105
10,868
6,211
50
4,959
14,877
4,959
17,357
9,919
100
7,562
22,686
7,562
26,467
15,123
2,451 10,101 18,633 29,757 45,369
137
2,466
0.269
269
273
4,914
1.109
1,109
369
6,642
2.046
2,046
465
8,370
3.267
3,267
573
10,314
4.981
4,981
784 2,706 4,750 7,363 10,982
$8,622 $29,770 $52,254 $80,991 $120,799
862 2,977 5.225 8,099 12,080
$9,484 $32,747 $57,479 $89,090 $132,879
(9.5) (32.7) (57.5) (89.1) (132.9)
B-3
-------
E. Costs: Landfill Design #2 (Membrane)
Sizes in Thousand MT's
Component
1. Stabilizing base of soil
- cut, spread, and compact
@ $3.00/m3
2. Buffer layers of sand
- purchase and spread @
$6.25/m3
3. Synthetic membrane liner
- purchase and install @
$5.00/mz
4. Soil cover
- cut, spread, and compact
@ $3.00/mJ
5. Perimeter collection ditch
- trench and pipe @ $18.00/m
6. Revegetation @ $1000/acre
7. Engineering @
8. Sub-Total
9. Contingency @ 10%
10. TOTAL
($1,000)
1
408
1,224
359
2,244
1,225
6,125
817
2,451
137
2,466
0.269
269
1,478
$16,257
1,626
$17,883
10
1,683
5,049
1,481
9,256
4,761
23,805
3,367
10,101
273
4,914
1.109
1,109
5,423
$59,657
5,966
$65,623
25
3,105
9,315
2,733
17,081
8,649
43,245
6,211
18,633
369
6,642
2.046
2,046
9,696
$106,658
10,666
$117,324
50
4,959
14,877
4,364'
27,275
13,689
68,445
9,919
29,757
465
8,370
3.267
3,267
15,199
$167,190
16,719
$183,909
100
7,562
22,686
6,654
41,588
20,736
103,680
15,123
45,369
573
10,314
4.981
4,981
22,862
$251,480
25,148
$276,628
(65.6) (117.3) (183.9) (276.6)
B-4
-------
II. SURFACE IMPOUNDMENT DESIGN
A. Range of Operating Sizes and Depths
Treatment/Storage Capacity
Surface Area (acres)
0.25
1.00
2.50
5.00
10.00
25.00
B. Design Assumptions
Operating Depth
Meters
2
2
3
3
4
4
1. side slopes are 2:1 (runrrise)
2. bottom length dimension is twice bottom width dimension
3. existing bottom and side liner thickness is one meter
4. final cover dimensions allow for cover over impoundment and liner
s i des
5. all soil and clay soil materials for clay cover are obtained on-site
6. sand needed for synthetic membrane cover is obtained off-site
7. one meter freeboard is maintained above operating water level
8. after impoundment is drained, there remains stable, workable sludge
at 50% of the original design volume of the impoundment
9. the impoundment's dikes are cut and placed into the impoundment and
then graded to a slope of 3% before final cover application
10. engineering fee of 10% includes permit application, design, and cer-
tification fees
C. Dimensional Calculations
2h
1. Assumptions: a=b, 2h=a=b, and 2w=l
a = b = corner dimension
w = bottom width
1 = bottom length
h = operating height
2. Volume = (h-w-a) + (h-l-b) + (h-w-1) + 4/3 (h-a-b)
3. Top cover dimension = w + (2-2h) and 1 + (2-2h)
B-5
-------
PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY
-------
4. Examples: h=2m Therefore, 2h=a=b=4m
w=17m
l=34m
t Volume = (2-17-4) + (2-34-4) + (2-17-34) + 4/3 (2-4-4) = 1607m3
Top cover dimension: h = 2m + 1m (freeboard) + 1m (existing liner) = 4m
Therefore, 2h=a=b=8m
o Top cover dimension: 17+(2-8) and 34 + (2-8) = 33m by 50m
B-6
-------
D. Costs: Surface Impoundment Desiqn #1 (Clay)
Operating Area (Acres)
Component
1. Fill and slope require-
ments
- cut and fill 9 $1.50/nr
2. Stabilizing base of
soil
- cut, spread, and compact
@ $3.00/m3
3. compacted clay liner
- excavate, spread, and
compact (3 $3.50/nT
4. Soil cover
- cut, spread, and com-
pact (3 $3.00/m3
5. Perimeter collection
ditch
- trench and pipe @
$18.00/m
6. Revegetation @
$1000/acre
7. Engineering @ 10%
8. Sub-total
9. Contingency @ 10%
10. TOTAL
($1000)
0.25
2,078
3,117
619
1,857
619
2,167
1,238
3,714
171
3,078
0.408
408
1,434
$15,775
1,578
$17,353
(17.4)
1.00
9,442
14,163
2,016
6,048
2,016
7,056
4,032
12,096
309
5,562
1.328
1,328
4,625
$50,878
5,088
$55,966
(56.0)
2.50
30,607
45,911
4,544
13,632
4,544
15,904
9,089
27,267
463
8,334
3.102
3,102
11,415
$125,565
12,557
$138,122
(138.1)
5.00
66,281
99,422
8,568
25,704
8,568
29,988
17,136
51,408
637
11,466
5.644
5,644
22,363
$245,995
24,600
$270,595
(270.6)
10.00
169,623
254,435
16,624
49,872
16,624
58,184
33,248
99,744
887
15,966
10.95
10,950
• 48,915
$538,066
53,807
$591,873
(591.9)
25.00
497,634
746,451
39,994
119,982
39,994
139,979
79,988
239,964
1,379
24,822
26.344
26,344
129,754
$1,427,296
142,730
$1,570,026
(1570.0)
B-7
-------
E. Costs: Surface Impoundment Design $2 (Membrane)
Operating Area (Acres)
Component 0.25 1.00 2.50 5.00 10.00 25.00
1.
_
2.
-
3.
-
4.
-
5.
-
6.
-
7.
Fill and slope
requirements
cut and fill @
$1.50/m3
Stabil i zing base
of soil
cut, spread, and
compact @ $3.00/m3
Buffer layers of
sand
purchase and spread
@ $6.25/m3
Synthetic membrane
1 i ner
purchase and install
@ $5.00/m2
Soil cover
cut, spread, and
compact @ $3.00/mJ
Perimeter collection
ditch
trench and pipe @
$18.00/m
Revegetation G>
$1000/acre
2,078
3,117
619
1,857
545
3,406
1,820
9,100
1,238
3,714
171
3,078
0.408
408
9,442
14,163
2,016
6,048
1,774
11,088
5,684
28,420
4,032
12,096
309
5,562
1.328
1,328
30,607
45,911
4,544
13,632
3,999
24,994
12,580
62,900
9,089
27,267
463
8,334
3.102
3,102
66,281
99,422
8,568
25,704
7,540
47,125
23,484
117,420
17,136
51,408
637
11,466
5.644
5,644
169,623
254,435
16,624
49,872
14,629
91,431
45,216
226,080
33,248
99,744
887
15,966
10.95
10,950
497,634
746,451
39,994
119,982
35,195
219,969
108,028
540,140
79,988
239,964
1,379
24,822
26.344
26,344
8. Engineering G> 10% 2,468 7,871 18,614 35,819 74,848 191,767
9. Sub-total $27,148 $86,576 $204,754 $394,008 $823,326 $2,109,439
10. Contingency G> 10% 2.715 8,658 20,475 39.401 82,333 210,944
11. TOTAL $29,863 $95,234 $225,229 $433,409 $905,659 $2,320,383
($1000) (29.9) (95.2) (225.2) (433.4) (905.7) (2320.4)
B-8
-------
APPENDIX C
DRAFT REPORT
A DEVELOPMENT OF TIME ESTIMATES FOR THE
CLOSURE OF LANDFILLS AND SURFACE IMPOUNDMENTS
Submitted to:
The Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Solid Waste
Prepared by:
Christopher J. Lough
Pope-Reid Associates, Inc.
533 St. Clair Ave.
St. Paul, Minnesota 55102
C-l
-------
Introduction
The proposed Interim Status Standards (ISS) specify under Subpart G (Closure and
Post-Closure) and Section 265.113, that closure activities must be completed in
accordance with an approved closure plan and within six months of receiving the
final volume of wastes. Further, the Regional Administrator may accept a longer
closure period if the Owner/Operator can demonstrate that the required or planned
closure activities will, of necessity, take longer than six months to complete
and that all steps have been taken to eliminate any substantial threat to human
health and the environment from the unclosed but inactive facility.
The feasibility of this six month allowance for the closure of facilities under
the proposed ISS regulations was investigated for the Hazardous and Industrial
Waste Management Division of the Office of Solid Waste. The study focused on deve-
loping time estimates for the closure of surface impoundments and landfills in accord-
ance with the requirements of the full status standards proposed in September 1979.
The closure of landfill facilities consists primarily of the placement of a final
cover on each landfill cell, the specifications of which are described within the
landfill section of the September regulations. A landfill cover is also employed
for surface impoundments that elect to close as landfills (i.e., accumulated resi-
dues remain in the impoundment and are not removed and disposed of off the property
site). The cost of closure of surface impoundments by drying and removal of residual
waste is prohibitively high, due to the transportation and disposal costs attri-
buted to waste disposal at a permitted hazardous waste facility. This would most
likely preclude the selection of this closure option by nearly all surface impound-
ments, particularly those in excess of one-half acre. For this reason, a detailed
time estimate was not undertaken. The time requirement for this closure option,
however, would not exceed the time estimates to be discussed later for surface im-
poundment closure.
C-2
-------
Components of the Closure Procedure
The closure of landfill and surface impoundment facilities entails a procedure that
is not limited to the construction of a final cover. A description of this proce-
dure and its components are to be identified in the closure plan each facility
must prepare. The major components of the closure activity that were considered
in this investigation are listed below
Landfills:
1. Disposal of remaining inventory
2. Decontamination of facility equipment (trucks, tractors, pumps,
storage areas, dewatering equipment, etc.)
3. Inspection of facility before closure construction begins - i.e.;
liners, collection systems, fences, dikes, etc.
4. Installation and revegetation of cover
5. Professional engineer's certification
Surface Impoundments:
1. Drainage of remaining liquid wastes
2. Decontamination of facility equipment (piping systems, conveyors,
mechanical sludge removing equipment, aerators, etc.)
3. Inspection of facility before closure construction begins
4. Sludge stabilization and recontour to grade
5. Installation and revegetation of cover
6. Professional engineer's certification
Potential Contingencies:
Certification failure, excess inventory, unusual decontamination, necessary
ground water remedial action, monitoring well failure, etc.
The closure plan should not only describe how and when the technical requirements of
facility closure will be met, but should also address the disposal of remaining in-
ventory, the decontamination of faci1ity-equipment, and the provisions for certifi-
C-3
-------
cation. The regulations require that within 90 days of receiving the final volume
of wastes, the owner/operator must treat and/or remove all wastes in storage or in
process from the site, or dispose of them on-site, in accordance with the closure
plan. Since it is common practice in the industry to accumulate quantities of
waste before permanently disposing of them, it was assumed that an operator would
have two weeks (10 days) of inventory at the time of closure which would have to
be disposed on- or off-site.
When the closure activities have been completed, all facility equipment must be
properly disposed of or decontaminated by removal of all hazardous waste and resi-
dues. According to a draft report prepared by International Research and Technology
Corporation (IR&T) entitled: An Analysis of Methods for Ensuring Continuity of
Operation for Hazardous Haste Disposal Sites, their sources indicate that this por-
tion of the regulations provides additional environmental protection, as long as a
site has been operated in an environmentally safe manner. At closure, an operator
would be required either to bury any contaminated equipment or clean it with a
decontaminating solution, which would be available as part of his normal operating
materials. In some instances, hazardous materials could be scraped off equipment
and other surfaces and then be disposed of. Provided a site has been maintained
properly during its operation, an estimate of two days has been allocated for this
activity.
The regulations also specify that a registered professional engineer must certify
that a site has been closed in accordance with the specifications in the closure
plan. An engineer must inspect the closure activities while the work is being per-
formed to measure the compaction of earth material, insure that proper soil is used, and
in general, monitor the closure activities. The amount of time required for cer-
tification depends on the size of the area to be closed, the length of time it
takes to complete closure, and site-specific conditions. For this study, it was
assumed that two inspections per month (for the duration that closure construction
C-4
-------
occurs) would be required. The two day inspection would also be a minimum for
all sites, regardless of their size or construction time requirements.
A thorough inspection of the facility should be conducted before construction be-
gins on the final cover. This inspection, which is estimated to take approxi-
mately one day, would check for any deterioration in the liner system, dike ero-
sion, inoperative monitoring wells, failure in collection or run-off systems,
loss of vegetative cover, etc. Necessary corrective action could then be assessed
and scheduled in the closure procedure for that specific site. Various remedial
activities for potential contingencies that may become necessary durinq the clo-
sure period will be discussed under closure contingencies.
Final Cover
The design of the final cover that is used on landfills and surface impoundments
consists of two layers of earth material and a synthetic membrane. The upper
level is an earth fill and topsoil layer approximately 45 cm (18 inches) in total
depth and is capable of supporting vegetation. The topsoil is approximately 9
inches deep. The middle layer consists of coarse sand, approximately 15 cm
(6 in.) thick, which promotes drainage sufficient to prevent percolating water
from the upper level from standing upon the lower layer. This sand layer is con-
nected to perimeter conduits to drain water away from the cell and into a collect-
ing wet well. The lower, or bottom layer, consists of a 20 mil PVC synthetic mem-
brane Liner to eliminate the percolation of water into the landfill cell or surface
impoundment. The final grade of this cover is 5 percent. The soil layer is
fertilized and seeded to promote a vegetative cover that reduces surface erosion.
Landfill Closure
Four different landfill cell capacities, each with different operating depths, were
designed to determine the time requirements for their closure. These annual cap-
acities and depths, as listed below, are representative of the wide range in land-
-------
fill sizes throughout industry and permitted commercial facilities.
Annual Disposal Operating Depth
(Metric Tons) (Meters)
600 Two
9,000 Four
45,000 Six
90,000 Eight
After the disposal of the final inventory, the landfill cell is assumed to have
reached its design capacity and is leveled and compacted to grade before the final
cover phase begins. Although the construction of the final cover can begin at this
point, the synthetic membrane liner (lower layer) is not installed until a 5% grade
has been achieved with earth fill material. This earth material, as well as the
soil layers in the actual cover, were assumed to be available on-site. The coarse
sand material is obtained from an off-site source, is assumed to be bought, loaded
and hauled two miles to the site.
The time estimates and equipment requirements for a given task (eg: compacted backfill,
6" to 12" lifts, with a sheepsfoot roller) were obtained from R.S. Means Co., Inc.,
Building Construction Cost Data 1979, incorporating daily output and crew needs. Equip-
ment assignments were made on the basis of the volume of work to be performed. Each
task was identified and assigned an appropriate daily output based on equipment avail-
ability, site size, and the efficient use of crew and equipment. For instance, when
fill material is dumped and spread by a dozer, it must be compacted to the proper den-
sity and thickness. This represents a dual task; the utilization of a dozer for
spreading and some form of compaction equipment. Various combinations of equipment
are employed to complete these two tasks at approximately the same time for each land-
fill capacity. Consequently, as material is dumped and spread, it is soon followed
by compaction equipment (either towed or self-powered) so that this, and any other
r.-fi
-------
assignment that involved dual tasks, could be completed as each respective task is
finished. The maximum difference in time allowed between individual tasks was
two days, and the tasks which required the longest time to complete determined the
total time for that work assignment. The construction components that require
this type of simultaneous activity are as follows: fill and compaction for slope
development, coarse sand placement and compaction for middle (drainage) layer, and
fill and compaction of soil (upper) layer. In addition, during the placement of
the drainage layer, the perimeter conduits to collect and drain run-off water from
the site are installed. Although no trench construction is necessary, one day
is allowed for surface preparation by the installation crew.
The time estimates developed for the installation of the synthetic membrane liner
were based upon information supplied by liner manufacturers and installers. An
estimate of 1.5 acres of membrane installed per 8 man crew per day was used in this
study. This base figure was adjusted to employ a 4-man crew on the 600 MT landfill,
but the 1.5 acres/day estimate was never exceeded on larger cells, A two-day site
preparation for all cell capacities was added to allow for the construction of
shallow trenches used for anchoring the membrane.
Time Estimates for Landfill Cell Closure
The following table lists the time estimates, in days, to perform each closure
activity for the landfill cell capacities in question. The time allotted for cer-
tification equals the number of estimated days divided by 22 work days per month,
times two inspections per month.
Surface Impoundment Closure
Four different surface impoundment capacities, each at a constant operating depth
of three meters (10 feet), were designed to determine the time requirements for
their closure. The sizes, which are 100,000 gallons, 1,000,000 gallons, 5,000,000
r_7
-------
Closure Activity
1. Disposal of remaining inventory
2. Facility inspection
3. Level and compact to grade
4. Spread and compact fill for slope
5. Install synthetic membrane liner
6. Spread and compact sand layer
and install run-off conduits
7. Spread and compact fill for soil
layer
8. Replace top-soil layer
9. Revegetation
10. Decontaminate facility equipment
11. Subtotal,
12. Contingency at 25%
13. Subtotal2
14. Certification
15. TOTAL DAYS
Closure Time Estimates (Days) for
Annual Landfill Cell Capacities (Metric Tons) of:
16. Months: (
Total Days
22 work days/month'
600
10.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
2.5 •
2.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
22.5
5.5
28.0
2.5
30.5
1.4
9,000
10.0
1.0
2.0
6.0
3.0
3.0
1.5
1.5
4.0
2.0
34.0
8.5
42.5
4.0
46.5
2.1
45 ,000
10.0
1.0
3.5
14.5
4.5
4.0
4.0
4.0
8.0
2.0
55.5
14.0
69.5
6.5
76.0
3.5
90,000
10.0
1.0
5.0
17.5
5.5
5.0
6.0
6.0
9.5
2.0
67.5
17.0
84.5
8.0
92.5
4.2
-------
gallons and 10,000,000 gallons, represent a range of typical capacities throughout
industry which would be faced with closure requirements under RCRA's ISS Regula-
tions.
The actual closure activities that are relevant to surface impoundments are essen-
tially the same asthose described for landfills. The construction of the landfill
cover for the surface impoundment follows the same design parameters and regulatory
requirements that were described previously. The major differences occur with the
preparation of the impoundment for the final cover application. The treatment of
the inspection, decontamination, and certification components is identical to that
done for landfill closure.
Before any cover construction can begin, the influent to the impoundment must be
terminated, and the impoundment must be drained of all surface water. The drainage
of these liquid (free-flowing) wastes is accomplished first through the impound-
ment's common outfall. It was assumed that one-half of the retained water volume
in the impoundment is drained via this outfall. The wastewater that remains is
then removed with portable pumps and pumped to an operative segment of the treat-
ment system for further treatment and disposal. The total estimated time required
for drainage varied from one and one-half to four days, depending on the impoundment
size.
Once all the standing water has been removed from the impoundment, a sludge/solids
blanket remains. Based upon calculations to determine the accumulation rate of
solid material in the impoundment, it was assumed that at closure time approximately
60 percent of the impoundment's capacity remained usable. The other 40 percent
would be filled with a sludge of 5 percent solids. Before the application of the
final cover could proceed, however, the sludge must be allowed to dry to about a
20 percent solids content.
C-9
-------
Allowing the sludge to air dry to this solids content would be feasible, but to
estimate the amount of time required for drying is quite difficult. The opera1
tion of sludge drying beds often produces a cake of 40 to 45 percent solids
within six weeks. On the other hand, sludge lagoons are capable of generating
30 percent solids, but usually require one to three years to accomplish this re-
sult. Since the impoundment's design and pre-closure condition are more similar to
those of sludge lagoons, rather than sludge drying beds, it was believed that one year
should be allowed for drying this material to a solids content of 20 percent. It
would then be feasible for construction equipment to begin the other preparatory
steps necessary before the actual cover is applied.
The one "year* drying time allowance is a recommendation, however, and any time
extension should remain at the discretion of the Regional Administrator. This
provision allows for other site specific conditions to be considered in the closure
process to assure that all steps have been taken to eliminate any substantial
threat to human health -and the environment from the inactive facility.
After the sludge has been sufficiently dried, gravel fill is added for further
stabilization and the total mass is compacted to attain structural integrity. An
amount of gravel equivalent to approximately 50 percent of the estimated sludge
volume present is added and compacted in the impoundment. This is followed by soil
fill, which is dumped, spread, compacted, and graded level to the surrounding ground
surface. Both the gravel and soil fill components involve dual tasks of spreading
and compaction, which are accomplished simultaneously. Once the impoundment is
brought to ground level, the final cover can then be applied. The designs and
procedures remain the same as described for the closure of landfill cells (e.g.,
the preparation time estimate for liner and run-off conduit installation is two
days and one day, respectively).
c-in
-------
Time Estimates for Surface Impoundment Closure
The following table presents the time estimates to perform each closure activity
on the surface impoundments being investigated. An allowance of one calendar year
for drying the sludge layer was then added to each closure total reported. It
should also be recounted that the one year allowance is only an estimate. It is
possible that this period could be exceeded under certain conditions or impoundment
sizes. Obviously, this issue is dependent on site-specific characteristics and
therefore any extensions in the closure time period should still remain at the
discretion of the Regional Administrator.
Potential Contingencies
As with any construction project, allowance must be made for potential problems
that may delay the construction schedule. These occurrences may be attributed to
a number of factors, the most common being: materials, equipment, and labor short-
ages, unanticipated site conditions, adverse climate, and poor construction prac-
tices. Contingencies that are probable during the closure procedure include:
failure of a portion of cover to meet the certification standards, replanting of
vegetation, excess inventory, unusual decontamination requirements, additional
pumping and leachate treatment capacity, necessary ground water remedial action,
ground water monitoring well failure, and liner failure.
Many of these potential contingencies were discussed and assigned a relative fre-
quency of occurrence in IR&T's draft report. This information was reviewed and
considered in the formulation of a contingency time estimate. As can be seen in
the two tables, a 25 percent contingency was allowed in the time estimates. It is
believed that this allowance would be sufficient to meet normal construction delays
due to climatic conditions and any shortages that are encountered. Ideally, each
phase of the construction process should be scheduled sequentially, complementing
and building upon the work that has already been completed. Unfortunately, construc-
tion projects are seldom accomplished with perfect efficiency, and the contingency
r_n
-------
Closure Time Estimates (Days) for
Closure Activity Surface Impoundment Capacities (Gallons) of:
100.000 1,000.000 5.000.000 10.000.000
1. Drainage Of impoundment 1.5 2.0 2.5 4.0
2. Facility inspection 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
3. Spread and compact gravel fill 0.5 3.5 9.5 12.5
4. Spread and compact soil fill 1.5 5.0 10.5 13.0
5. Grade to level with ground surface 0.5' 0.5 I'.O 1.0
6. Spread and compact fill for slope 0.5 3.0 10.5 17.5
7. Install synthetic membrane liner 2.5 3.0 3.5 5.0
8. Spread and compact sand layer and
install run-off conduits 2.0 2.5 4.0 4.5
9. Spread and compact fill for soil layer 0.5 1.0 3.0 5.0
10. Replace top-soil layer 0.5 1.0 3.0 4.0
11. Revegetation 1.0 3.0 7.5 10.0
12. Decontaminate facility equipment 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
,13. Subtota^ 14.0 27.5 58.0 79.5
14. Contingency at 25% 3.5 7.0 14.5 20.0
15. Subtotal2 17.5 34.5 72.5 99.5
16. Certification 2.0 3.5 6.5 9.0
17. TOTAL DAYS 19.5 38.0 79.0 108.5
18. Months 0.9 1.7 3.6 4.9
19. Plus One Calendar Year - Months 12.9 13.7 15.6 16.9
-------
provides some adjustment for actual experience and circumstance. It is also prob-
able that this addition would cover such closure contingencies as certification
failure, replanting of vegetation,.and further decontamination. The time
allotted for contingencies, however, should not be viewed as a predictable or
maximum level. It is likely that contingencies such as excessive inventory,
additional leachate removal capability, ground water remedial requirements,
and liner failures could require time expenditures of up to 6 months to rectify
(particularly if more than one contingency occurred). The selection of 25 percent
represents a reasonable estimate given the number of potential contingencies that
can occur, and the efforts necessary to correct them.
Results and Conclusions
The closure of individual landfill cells, based upon the capacities examined, ex-
presses a range from one and one-half to four and one-half months before all clo-
sure activities have been completed and the cell is secured. Closing the largest
cell (90,000 MT) is estimated to require 4.2 months. Although this is well within
the six month time period given in the regulations, if two or more cells at this
same operating capacity closed simultaneously, this estimate would easily exceed
4.2 months, and probably require longer than six months to finish. Commercial
landfill facilities typically operate more than one landfill cell at a time, allow-
ing for proper waste segregation by chemical type or disposal practice (i.e.
sludges, drums, etc.). If closure of two or more cells fell at approximately the
same time (or if the entire site required closure) any difficulties encountered in
the availability or allocation of equipment and manpower would severely hinder a
completion schedule within the six-month period. To avoid this potential problem
in large facilities, the owner/operator should specify in his closure plan a schedule
which would prevent this from occurring.
C-13
-------
The closure of surface impoundments follows approximately the same range in months
for work required as for landfills. The smallest surface impoundment, 100,000
gallons, requires about one month for cover construction. The largest impoundment,
10,000,000 gallons, will take approximately 5 months for cover application. Al-
though it appears that all sizes would be able to complete the construction phase
within a six-month time period, an allowance for sludge drying must be factored
into the time estimate. Before cover construction can begin, a period of one cal-
endar year is recommended for impoundment drying and preparation. Consequently,
this amount of time has been added to each estimate developed. Because each capa-
city now exceeds the time allotted in the regulations, permission to conduct the
closure procedure in this manner would now reside with the Regional Administrator.
C-14
-------
APPENDIX D
RCRA Waste Management Summary Sheets
Page number
Inorganic Chemicals D-l
Leather Tanning and Finishing D-21
Metals Mining D-45
Nonferrous Metal Smelting and Refining D-69
Organic Chemicals D-l06
Textiles D-l 17
-------
INORGANIC CHEMICALS
-------
Industry fQU^AM K
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUM.MARY
Model
Number of Plants
O
P,<
6/11/80
Date u- fi(f /SO
Product! on lloOQ
(
Waste Streams
I.U/IO
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
b/ll/SU
Date (fl/;u-/5'0
Industry lMO\?.CnAM
Number of Plants
ic CH&HIC.ALS
-=•
Model U'XVi
Production
Hint: 1 \(.\\\f
4400 W
•!- ^. ^ '
/o/^UX
M
Waste Streams
(. UDLO . ^lu.(i^>
Q,mi
-------
Industry I \\0llfci /I
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
iMvC C\lE>UC/\tJb Model CkrfilKO VV/V
3
Production (nUOO "W
6/11/80
Date L£ /lU /SO
, ._!.,_ V^ .. *~2
^AxT
^
Waste Streams
L UOU) ^.lucK^
3
jj
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
1146
No.
of Plants
~
Waste Management
Technology
A- 14 fl
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A- 01 0^
No.
of Plants
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
1
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
0,CK
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
Productiqn 1 °\. 6CO
6/11/8U
Date irjn.
Waste Streams
I . U) L)J S 1 U. dv
-------
Industry ) 1Mb ftCnA MlC
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model I i4-Cmvvi\\\
6/11/80
AjL-Ci\Wnb
Number of Plants
Product! on
1 R
^
Waste Streams
J. •SjiJQ.U-t. OVt
3. WtO Slu-Acc
O
SMYvJL GLO Q_bo\j4
«V ,vC
0
tn
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^"NQ^j *— i
^y \ ^^ I
bii^
a'^7
No.
of Plants
1
1
I
Waste Management
Technology
l\- \~^ (tOOuC^L \^
l^-sbCwcvi"^.^
3- \^ l°i
G - 14 \°i
*) ;
QO U^7^- 5j
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A- 04,01,03
0-6
•B-OA,OI
C-01,03.,
No.
of Plants
\
1
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
-5
1)
3
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
0.5
0.3
0.5
-------
industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
6/11/80
Date
Model "Ti.l f* l \ . *
'' **• ^*^~ 1 Vrf ^i 1 LLCi v t^-
Ti
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
T], to 3^(
I0,llo\
4445
No.
of Plants
\
\
Waste Management
Technology
/\-06 (vjowrtt 0
\~S Cvjjc^ti 0)
\Q
^'(oi-^
Qo 01 (u)oM^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
/x- OA o \
•B-o»,oa)Qs
No.
of Plants
\
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
/^*S
^^^
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
^
o.<,
-------
Industry MlM?(-i A kill
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
Number of Plants
u w\
6/11/80
Date
• Gk lo/iftjg PnCE. ^ -
Product!qn
"W-O/i.
Waste Streams
\, *putivt ov^
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
i
Model ry\\um c
6/11/80
Date fc /((c /go
Product! on
.
\*7 3 . Co CO -\EJ v> ^ /u /~
sj
Waste Streams
1, spAU'L ore
9. 10 uO °oUcd^c
3
S
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
i
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Industry Mbe_hAO 1C
6/11/80
Date (Cl
Number of Plants
Mode i Ti-Va i> v u. u\v ^£> vox i cVi -S. VLJJ Jccte ITOOA^ - S. > a \
Product! on ~*& OC^O Ap v\C. /( A
Waste Streams
3, UJlO SAvjLQVC*
3. \AMS>C. SAu^LS
•D
D
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
444,011
\~74l*
No.
of Plants
3
Waste Management
Technology
(POCw(Xx)t(L
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model li-Wu^v^ \cj\v A\ -
6/11/80
Date
Number of Plants
Production
"^QQ
M
Waste Streams
\. ^pttlY^ OV^
Q. u3u) ^lac\UL
-5 \\ f C1 \ \
o. \v c. uc^GS
0
i
o
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
Mio.on
^468
QU^o
No.
of Plants
1
Waste Management
Technology
/\- O^s (tOCuitt \J
Ca-^.uu^
. / ,j_ »O>
^ I (_uJCuoitp'oJ
\^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
fVbi^cd
No.
of Plants
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
aui,
-------
Industry \MOith/XKUL
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
6/11/80
Date
/Rft
Model
-j-Qi V
Number of Plants
1
Production
Waste Streams
L'jpivt OrC
0, UJUO C. SU^c\^
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/11/80
Date I,
/gO
Number of Plants
Production
Waste Streams
\, S^W4*- 0>^L
5, uJuO slvjL^C
3
_i
S3
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
4^1
mco
No.
of Plants
1
Waste Management
Technology
Ac-o.6^1
(a-\3.T7 CLL.
JLO.t.1^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-oi
No.
of Plants
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
4
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
13.T7
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/11/80
Date I/j
'. MO
Number of Plants
Product! op
COO
Waste Streams
sfuivvt °vC
u
.^
jO
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
13^4^3
No.
of Plants
\
Waste Management
Technology
A -13^1
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04,01
No.
of Plants
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
ii, a
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
A ^ ' j
M O llkA ^ \C 1 , H"E M O l5> Mo de 1 TiOQ IU. W\ -
Number of Plants 1 Production "7*7
i
6/11/80 ,
Date (^ / f (£
/SO
N I • .^> Q-c^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
iv-ot
No.
of Plants
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
1
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
G..S
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
6/11/80
InlfU? R
Industry )MC)l
Number of Plants 17*
Waste Streams
g. ddlc ujo/rtx-
SGiU^ CIO (Xboi>£,
VI
0
en
u
M
II
u
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
m?
SCLlKfi. OuO
(xbo o-^L
u
u
U
V.I
Vi
No.
of Plants
\
5
3
1
a
Model
Cl\ W\iMi - I)\aoKxcAvv\ (HI rvoav
b
t - \i?-C i
Production Ql,(_>>O(^ "fr/KSbX//"
Waste Management
Technology
/\ - O'S'^^^ Is)
Jlfr-Ck J
0^ IvjOCjltf ^ }
"g-OS^wcu^ ^ x
Q-O^d/jo/i'tc I }
(.O-U.S^ScvxjeocI^
\A- Cu)^"tt ^^
^ - ^Iwci/'stiO
Ci'S Cu^cuitit. "3 3
E - \A (VJOG orta. u
0 S C wcX'jU. Q \
F- \^\ 1 VjOOyitd 0
\3 CuXx/iti. 3 )
iQ
6- K
M- W^fl
i • VJ
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04, 01
"5-04,01
c-oi,oa
Ti-
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model 0 \
n
6/11/80 .
Date (ol((c
f'lU JTQC&S>- S^cfr
Product! on
Waste Streams
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
Waste Management
Technology
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
No.
of Plants
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
0.
\N\VA d
A -03 tuJd/JOJ. l
C3
OQ
A-04,01
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
6/11/80
Date \n
Industry 1 Klhtf £,|\ lO\C P 'rVtVUC A-LS>
Number of Plants \ \
Waste Streams
\ . \0 V l \vjl \*\\ VJL d.
,3. CxiLL UiuAtX
^(XvvJL (X/i oOoo V>JL
u
i
u
u
K
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
\A-8
•^(X^vJt. CLA
(X^OOO^
'I
vv
\v
IV
1 t
No.
of Plants
1
a
i
a
a
\
Model
Ai ', ^v , A f. f f\ ' <^
( v\ \hr \\vJi - Jj\0 Pn^TC \ \\\ I i' L\. rv OCL^S, - .NV <2 o
1 o
Production Q \ \ . GOO "l?-luVl A/"
Waste Management
Technology
/\ - 0"2> Lwo/iii i\
0"D IvOftA^S.^-)
"R -0"^ LooCitfti. I ) ,
I-T. (_u)6j5tt 0 j
(^ - lA Cuid/^tk 0
6£)(.uXjj5tC. ^^
"YN _ \A CuiCuCfU, f*}
O'SlijOOJ^. 3 )
"^ _ \4\ (\j$U$(Sl \)
F- iA
6- IA fl
1 '0
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
/V-04,01
"B-pA-,01
C-04,01,0^
^"-^0^
E-OA,0\0^
F-oi^oa
6- 01, oa
No.
of Plants
\
3
\
I
i
a
\
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
s
a
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
b.VSS
U.3^5
(^9 . 3 ^ o
-------
Industry \Mf:)£(nAUlL QjtVE
Number of Plants \_\
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
6/11/80
Date
Model QUn\vk- \4tAlUflJU Oi (1 WOCJ&S -
Production
(I
'VI
Waste Streams
ulonwfi. v\vucl
0. Vl^- U-C&VUv^ ^luckC,
i.m^c. MuA^GS
s>Q. \\vt_ GJ$ OL.boyJL
»
U
11
JLtCLpt \V\\SC. Skv^'ctS
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
\OA-\
-33
SS3. M
M
K
U
U
40
No.
of Plants
\
a
4
1
I
Waste Management
Technology
/\ - (4 CuXnJU'i \}^]
l^jCuXuJOl. "^)
ifl
l"jCw)cute 5)
d- 13 ^ \°1
5i- -14
E"-0^C£
pr, \"j)lu)^rliO
O*^ (uJOL/jiiiO,
X^ «_/ * |
iQ.
tl "• \"?j Cu)Cv.i)\lt lj
lAv3.0(u)Ci/t6]
lcl
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
ft- 04 ,01^0^
Ti-M.Ol.Ga
G - 04 ,0 I
Tb- Ol ,OS.
E-Ol
03 (.(nvJl^i
£3-04,01,05
No.
of Plants
\
I
a
A
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
a
a
i
a
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
(..tt
fc.«5
(*.3^J
IP • 3 S' 3
tj"^D3
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
6/11/80
Date U/ia/P.Q
Model 0 V\lt>YlML--HkACVJUbu Ollil 't
14
Producti on
Waste Streams
1. bnvut \\vucL
9. 14^- W^uvc slw^c
3, -ft\W> 'blvLO^e.S
^a \\\JL a/} (\boo-t
7 vi
10
W
K
(V
\v
^a^vji cub abc o-C
^apt msc. ^luA#v
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^51^8
SUCo
•VVM
Sa\\O2 O/)
aljowi
V V
\K
M
v\
Vl
30O
No.
of Plants
\
\
\
\
a
^
•s
a
Waste Management
Technology
ft-lA Lwcwdsi^
\^'(.u)CL/it£ -3)
1°(
:g_ 13(^:^1,3}
O^CuOCi/Jto 3)
^(p.D'S'S &<^
\<\
^. \\ Ucvitcs 1^
\3twax3ti 3)
\S
"b-\7>r l°\
h- \A
F^ \A- } \°\
G-O-I
CO-U.^'SA*-
JL^cK")
VI- 1^100/30. 0
\A(uXwjti) 3^
^.00(.^OJU3)
\c\
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04, Ol^a
B-OA,0\jOa
C- OAjO^, 03i
i>-OA-^ 01
5 -0\^
P-Ol-,03|
0*5
G-O^o^
-G\
H- 04 01,0^
o^
No.
of Plants
\
\
i
1
a
I
1
4
SI
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3«
I
•a
^
a
a
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
(,.253
b.^^^
tp.a^-S
(o. 3'o"3'
6>.P^
U9^
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
I
Model (Ml IOY LlsA-VlcACUJL' -±.(A
6/11/80
Date to /18ISO
Product!on Q \ Q .^c
JBJXC-K^
14 (uXv:W)
1A 30 C^^^
1 -3N
^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
/V- 01
•
*-o\ps
No.
of Plants
1
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3.
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
(^ . 3 O 0
-------
LEATHER TANNING AND FINISHING
-------
Industry \_& ATH E £ T)\HUlM6
o/ll/ou
Date
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model 0. \-\Vn\\VO \frtt /Pulp VUvW
ih \ (so
' i
Number of Plants
Producti on
MT/- •. \/
' VI
Waste Streams
o.^3{f°'"SS
4 . bu(
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
ModelC.lv
•A
6/11/80
U/ J. J./ OU / I
Date 7/7\\ \ gQ
yc*
Production
0
Waste Streams
1 , Vu\UHtw;vS/sWiUliA.O
A , bvAWr i^i
•s.uxt-rtx £\^Ws
^ o^aw
\>
u
"iSpl^lufr1
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
3-S4
\ 7,1 0>
~e,-^
\o3
•^CLlAvjL CLA
(XiOOO-^L
H
\o,^o
No.
of Plants
\"S
\
l\
a
Waste Management
Technology
A- Q3.
"B-oa.n
»^ ^"^^ t ^ \
63 (UKJU-S)
^ -61 («oAlio 1 -
4 j
1 0 (uXwtk "^S ,
J
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A- 64
•B-O^O^
Q-Ol,6^)<^
-01^03
M-
^-01,04-
No.
of Plants
\-s
\
1
3
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
\
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
•i.0
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date -/ / -p, I PO
P A Tl-l £ ^ \ A Kl Kl 1 M (j Model l_A\ VO IKO \ G.V\ -K,LV O Y\ a \ \r - M
i '
Number of Plants \*S Production ":'J"7?j<3 MT/U '/
u
Waste Streams
\ i TfU\U\U\\
w *
"3 . S* ^ASi
tl C ^
o
4 . V) VA Q- V v \vc. ^ u5»"V
•^ . YyO&.3Ai- \ u\vS IvO 4
c^OL^vJL Cl/} dljou-Q^
11
5>(X\.'\vJ5- GJ~^ CL^OOU1^
^X\\vi. GX> (X-^ooo^
u
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
"\43
"^c^^S*
~7.a
ffilU^
1 1
33 a\3
j
SOLi'V^o. (x/)
u
No.
of Plants
8
1
3
1
1
1
Waste Management
Technology
r\ ""O.o)-
JJ ~\~) C> \ i
1 ' - (\ \ {^faStyJ^ '"
0 ol t\^CuSU ^)
3) ' 0 ol (. WCiAli^ ,
II
O o Cu)W(ii "2> j
( o • U Q O
E ~01S^
F'SE\)
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
"B-0\, 04 j
Q-l^;°a.S
i -01,04,03
1^-0 1 ^A
Ko.
of Plants
8
\
a
1
1
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Imooundments
No.' per
Plant
3
•<,
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
l-'i-l
"~3 ^ O
•3 ~ c>^. O
\ J A 1
1-0-3
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
""ft
6/11/80 ,
Date -7 J-S\ 8O
1 1^1-^ "^^^^__ ' ^^. • 1 1 '
Industry LEATHFfc. \AUV\\Ufr Model PUvovvJL l(\Y\ HA \ \0 HOuy - 1 —
\ i
Number of Plants \ ^). Production \O P> 3 U KT /UW
U
Waste Streams
\ > A~v \ V\ \ \\\ w V^s> /^ \>& 0 \V.lCi
"5" , Ui^XAAiS- -AVVVN-Sa^^
\
^U^UvJL CIA (Xbo^^L
3
•
h
'I
^Q^vl CL/^ dbol^j
^cii\>j^ Q.A cxbou^,
Mft "^
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
S06^
4%^
't&M. 00
alooufi-
V ^
1 1
704U
0 p,^
No.
of Plants
rl
\
\
I
1
i
i
Waste Management
Technology
^"^
^ _ op ^ |c\
(1 - 0 i ( wxurvx/^ i~
\°1
^"oS
E - 0 1 luxusiw)
1-4^
F- Gltow
1-4) x
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
^'W
13-M ,o i j
C -01,03 ,03,
D-O^OSOA
E -01 ,031,
p_ Q y (3ZJ.
No.
of Plants
1
\
^
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Lo
3
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
2-0. a
0-0- I
a-o.^
1-^.0^
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
r\ \ T"
Model Lm'C>\\v£ \a\i\
b/ll/uu
Date '
Ci i V
x\_
Number of Plants
Production "oQ . °\ *S D. WT/U
Waste Streams
,
\ i V * w\ vv\ v v. ^b A- ) A 0 vu.s£,
,3. ScvCjf y/vvvvrS
4'. bull-uvc viusH"
^ l0^ y«*^^
^^cxnvii o>0 cxbovA
3
1
O
n
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
"?iQH^
^ 0
\^o8
sanvfiL QjC)
aboo^
No.
of Plants
A
1
1
Waste Management
Technology
A -OS.
P,-fM(u)(iMW
M)
Q^)(_^0-otfi ^
vl •" 0 / lw^ ^^
\~A-}
| O(wuiyiji
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
•B-04,01,
}
No.
of Plants
4
\
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
To. a
o/ll/ou
Date -f fa I
Uftvr-
A
Production Q tj
Waste Streams
\ . AY \v\\ v\\\w^S» /^VOLV5U\SS
Q. ^OHlLVX \\\CA
•3. ^luiyL
"S", lOCLjtc Auust^~S
•o
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^"^
^
SsOi\\\JL 0-0
(Xboo^
No.
of Plants
3
1
Waste Management
Technology
P\ - 0^
62 [UCM&
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
3-64- 0\,6D;
oi ]
No.
of Plants
3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
o/ll/ou
Date T 3 \
Industry ( FATH^^- AklMjUG Model C,Y\YOW£ \ CCv\ ( ^CUvC1 H<\\V^ — I—
Number of Plants "^5 Production \C) 6 3 A- K~TA\(
0
Waste Streams
l k V iv\\ \u \\v^ /s Kauiv^s
•3 ^ludVL
^, ^)^I(M^5\ ^^^
•5, (A)Cur!x ^Uv^kS*
'bO.^Mi QJS abou4
o
ro
u
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
\003
'^
<&. rvjL o^
otac*XL
1 \
No.
of Plants
\
\
1
Waste Management
Technology
A-oa
^-03 \°i
0 - 0\ Cu)Ow3itA
N.
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
ft-0^
T> _Q4 Q|
03^ '
0-04,01,
No.
of Plants
\
\
}
Treatment/ Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
1-0.4^
i-c.
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
nn\
o/ll/ou .
Date "7 / 3 v I
Industry L_t A-THtilZ \ /\-kl MlKlfl Model 1\\OV\C\\YO\\^. \ CLV\ - o
Number of Plants Cn Production S*S "O MT/^V1/
J
Waste Streams
\, S.CV^fi-VUlM.S
^.CLWJL CL/^ (X.boU-Q,
vllOJLpt ^iuc\L^
J
*S(X\VJL (X;3 CXboU^L
\^\0 \vD
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
'5A4
3^80
sanoL o^
cxbo^Q.
No.
of Plants
5
1
l
1
Waste Management
Technology
A-oa
^'01^
(_0.33 (.uxu3b. 3X
Co. -3"3o^
1 Oi
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A- - 04
•B-G\,G3-,
J /
O o CvO\^ v
) Q/l\ci \\ \\ CT)\\u
0
0 — O^-\- 0 1
") )
ov
D-oo
No.
of Plants
a
)
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
5
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o.<>
-------
o/ 11/ou /
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date ~/7 .3 ( /SO
i -T"- i i , p- i I ' '
Industry [jFATHfc"^ '/VUkl \IVjn Model NOV\ClwC\K& \Cu\- r"j
Number of Plants J^ Production <-\- ( ~~1 \u5 M ^ A- \V
0
Waste Streams
\t ^CY-CXAMU^S
u
:0.uu. GOJ c^bci^)
vaxct|jl ^lud^c.
i
0
0
\.CLV\VJL CLD dlxi-^
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
ys*o
nfl
\3 8°!^
1
S»CLl\VJ). 0;0
cxbo>j^L
No.
of Plants
a
\
\
Waste Management
Technology
A-O^
^-0\tu»^0
0"3(ux^)4)
CO » ^ O-C. )
^
P - (C 1 ^c^t^u
0"S^oo^iL.j)
3) -OU
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A - 0^
T*,-c>\} 03,
03
C-04,01,03
No.
of Plants
"3-
I
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
£
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
\-~7.G
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
"A
b/ 11/80
Date ~? [ 3 1 / gQ
Industry L_ k^THlrr £- 1AM^\14(-) Model 1 \G YNC.I \\fGO ^ XCv-V^ ~" 1~~
Number of Plants *H
Waste Streams
\, S»C\-£AV\ \VvCS
3. sU^
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
f\UKilli(~i
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
b/ll/au
Date -t
(U.V-
80
\
Production
\*5.
Waste Streams
\ . AT ^tt\\\\rs/s|xxoi\\AS
Ov ^C \~CL\,N \v\xS
4V\ II 1 / I I I V \ lilt ^V 1
\) IA. i |\ * v V v Vj-* vx.O •
^.vooAtji^Ua
11
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
"5AO
a
ID. 8
T
cxboo*£
M
No.
of Plants
1
l
\
Waste Management
Technology
A -09-
\
d-os^ ^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
~£>-G4 01
A-o ' '
£-04.01
03 '
No.
of Plants
~7
1
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
^
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
\-o ~IS
0.^^
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
.A
6/11/80
Date *
fiQ
Production
M. \
Waste Streams
I , "fr ( \.i\\ m i n CS/^ hd o i H JS
T S 1 1>- ^ \^
4 L V)U I M ^V ^-^-J^ ^
3 vy
i
^JXI\VIL OA abou^
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
16(0^7
11)
45
ijCX^vC. O/D
(Vboo-L
No.
of Plants
ID
\
Waste Management
Technology
A/\. (^\
v^/ O^
"B-OSLtuxatis
! 1"^
inlojci/rU-
•s)
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
"£-04
No.
of Plants
(0
^^
\
i
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acresl
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model KJL-ki
nn.A
o/'ll/ou
Date -
U
So
~_1
Product! on
Waste Streams
\v HriMlUUVCS/^KftOlK^
3, 'ilvAcKc. ,
•^ . VOCxOMSL I imSlvlS
o [)
CO
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
"^Q1
-^ea
n
No.
of Plants
8
1
Waste Management
Technology
A-03L
^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
"B-04
No.
of Plants
8
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry L E/\TH-giZ-
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
<, - L
o/ll/ou
Date -7
Number of Plants
Production
^U
Waste Streams
\, TY'llUlUUUS/SklUUvAS
3. ^CVOLVM^MS
3, Sltuivk
0
OJ
\\
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
IOSM
6
ins
&looi>^
\\
No.
of Plants
S
\
a
Waste Management
Technology
A-oa
\0 IvOCu'^'U'
C- O^t (v>Jw5tLQ
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A- 04
"B-CA
No.
of Plants
oi
\
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
^,A
b/ll/tJU ,
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date 1 1^\ /go
-CATHee. "\AKlMlM6 Model No T?:ft.(X.mWvUJ2. - S>
Number of Plants | Production \Q^ H.T/v-A/'
1 u
Waste Streams
L Vwrnivc^
3. s;cHL(_u lU
•5, l^&^Jy^
^\auiu^s
UL^A i
d'visMS
S a iM- CLO cxbo VA-d
a
CO
tn
"SGUAvjCL dO OlboU^v
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
a
1
SS*"
413
No.
of Plants
1
\
Waste Management
Technology
A-0£
^5 -O \Uoz5fe
\~<^^
03 (u)(V5tL.
Q-01 (uOOji^
ftrf
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04
'£$
c-oi.oa
O^o ,M-
No.
of Plants
S
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
-.A
fa/ll/au j
Date -7 /3i /^<^
Industry ) G'ATHf.\Z Ti\ XlMlMb Model N O !R> C G.V\\ h ftl vX-0. - M
Number of Plants I
Waste Streams
Ij, Silouk^'
A . \0 ^\ j ltl( t-\LUli~
"S , UKuS"^ jAVM^JL/i
0
^CXVYVJL o^o cxboo^
0
1
U)
en
^(tpt *\^
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
81
i. a
^Xn\JL CLXi
OJoO(^(L
No.
of Plants
1
1
Production "^H- J^ Wl \ I^~('C
Waste Management
Technology
A -.0^
0 1 lu)Oj$tSL
Q-()\ CioOjtJL'^
1 34-}
C) Q. ( vocxotL
QJ> LuoojltX
CO-^^ aO
^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
k-0^
"S-O^C&i
04
C-01,03,
03 7 o^l
No.
of Plants
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry Ls*ATHP\L
AMNmh
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model Mo T^.amV\hUA£- 1
Number of Plants 1 Q)
Waste Streams
| , \t v\\\ v\\ U^SA \\CL 0 lute
Qk ^UX£Jl\A\Vvy>
3 C>luC^VO
^Giftvi CUO Oibou^.
^OL\"\VJL CLO cxbois^ i
vlll^Lpv: Sla.ciyi-
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
16
u>
sa?^
4110
No.
of Plants
n
i
1
i
"IA
6/11/80
Date "7/3i 1 9<^>
/ f
Production ) SS- lo H \ /M ^
Waste Management
Technology
OUuoa/5tS-3^
Q -0^ C^^"^-*
3) ~0 1 (uiO/jtl^
05 Cu)Ou5tJL
Co.S'S a^O
u
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04
^0°^'
0^' 04
^-.01,08,
/
No.
of Plants
\
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Vi/\
Date ""
Model
I/U -- - \ llJL -
Pj
Producti on "^ 8 (jt 6 HT MV^
Waste Streams
\> vT\\\U\UlvA^ /sj \CiUlK A ^
""i C"* t t\ f X
3, sivLfl^C-
"x.CLvAvfl- (XA QjOOlA-fi-
o
CO
00
u
1 t
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
T?
\-54T
^Ctv\V(L CXO
(xbot^s-
V i
U
No.
of Plants
^
1
I
Waste Management
Technology
A -03
3 - 9 ^1 (ujostji
0
IS ^
C'03lvuC^Xu
0 I tao/JtL
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
1} _ A^i /v i
0"S>
1 )
05-
No.
of Plants
s
\
1
\
I
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
-2
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
1-1, U
1-0-5
1-3.0
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
Date "7 /"?,
\.l\L
Product! on
G^S Ml/
M
Waste Streams
1. WirtU^ysl-ttUUl^
3. qoutf^^S
•s I L^- >-»\VL^
sa^- (V.abo^
o
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
1381
"SVb
\ /\ ~) ^"^
I "°
aK^T
No.
of Plants
3
3
Waste Management
Technology
A-01
3-o^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A _A i A ^
1
"B-04
No.
of Plants
3-
3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
IA10til 106
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model SkflAAJJ.Ui
b/ll/BU .
Date 7/31
"-
Number of Plants
Production l\AA
/\
Waste Streams
\ . SiCAJMlAA 1 W CS
' Lip I N_L
o ' ^^MT'^ M/^J'|
<5
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model ^y/iA 1\{\?S -
lumber of Plants
0/J.1/&U
Date ~?
9O
Production
'ei£%
Waste Streams
1 1 S dl_C.O 1 1 1 1 \C ^N
^ S 1 L^ cK C
•? In IlilvC" clU/Y"V
- -10
1
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
\ Q
;d V-n
No.
of Plants
A
Waste Management
Technology
A-o^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04
No.
of Plants
4
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
o/ll/ou ,
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date ft A 1 ftft
Industry LcATHlTK- lAMKAlUC-i Model ^Rs^tUV\S- H
Number of Plants csL Production "~7~7 1 1 M. /U 'f"
U
Waste Streams
1 1 rf ( IA\ n\ » we S/S to o lujS
^.ScrCQ-VMvUS t
c>luc\vfi.
it) ^
?\. -hriw\vt\\v\>^S^\aOuiJ5
•^' I f\ c\
vvJ ^
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
a^aa
'4"S«\}
No.
of Plants
\
Treatment/ Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
4
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
0.*
-------
Industry LOATHE ft- Ti\KiM \tiC-i
Number of Plants ~
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
o/il/bu . ,
Date -7 /3 if 8Q
Production
KT /
M
0
Waste Streams
UXJSt,- ^v%lMA
SLo_ \\vJL CLO QLUO\^L
a
i
OJ
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
4
-------
Industry L.EATH&VZ
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
- L
O/ll/OU . i
Date 7/3t j gQ
^ /
Number of Plants
Production
Waste Streams
UtUTfe- ^VKkW
Scu\ujL (LCi (xbouiiL
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
10
SCx\WL GL£
(Xloou-^
No.
of Plants
33,
Waste Management
Technology
A-b-a.
"B-\O
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
^-04
No.
of Plants
3S
3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No." per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
METALS MINING
-------
Industry H" Tf\LS H I M \UG>
Number of Plants f>
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/11/80
Date
b*M *•"- ^*^/ ' I ' -'
- 3 .<> X10 MT/o. -r -SuAf a ^
j / v
Production ^.<> XV0 KT/U/
/ 0
Waste Streams
\\\((( -lavlu\^s
a
-C.
tn
Quantity
(MT/yr-p.lant)
S8CO(000
No.
of Plants
8
Waste Management
Technology
A-\8
(Q© \60 ac
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-O\^O"3
No.
of Plants
8
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
6/11/BO ,
Date g/ |
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model CoQQp'/ - [o,"7 XlCr MT/ .V - IU (JX '/"^O\l M\
i i
Production
U
Waste Streams
mill ia.Um^
o
1
01
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
33,880,000
No.
of Plants
°0
Waste Management
Technology
A-V8
(Q.@ ^|OOcLC
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-C1 ,O3
No.
of Plants
"3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model CopAW- LIXIO
O/ll/bU
Date
Number of Plants
Production [p. "7
U
Waste Streams
\\\ I 1 \ l"(XLA 1 lA.^ S
a
i
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
£(, ,340,000
No.
of Plants
\0
Waste Management
Technology
A-V8
L9v@) ^ICO CLC
JIGLC^)
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A- -01 ,03
-01
No.
of Plants
Qi
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model Cc-cK^f - £9 X\C^° MT
"}
o/il/ou
Date
Production 3Q
Waste Streams
wuU •icuhiA'sS
o
^
JO
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
\
Waste Management
Technology
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
No.
of Plants
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
VI \MlM6
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
o/il/bu
Date
Model
Co QQJfc Y - 0 9 X \ 0 *° MT/U >f - S I' '/ ( 6.
Number of Plants
4
Production 13
Waste Streams
?
Quantity
(MT/yr-p.lant)
No.
of Plants
4
Waste Management
Technology
A- 18 ^
( 3 ©/ ~"7 >-^ ^"^
Ji6-CK- j
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
No.
of Plants
4
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
M 1- 1l
S
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model h Oic.1 - 1 V
o/ll/ou
o/ou / ,
Date "7 /"go /c?Q
Lli\cl(/C'.;T)i'i'\d
Number of Plants
Production
_ y
Ml A
»t/
V)
Waste Streams
mill - avliu^>
o
1
en
O
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
D
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
MlMlkifa
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Modeled - I VICT' MT/'..y -
0/ll/OU .
Date 7/3O
Production
Waste Streams
II \ 1 /•> C-
Y\\ill ")CXi.Ul^vS
a
i
en
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
~ . -<,^v'\
J \7|oOO
No.
of Plants
^
TI>
Waste Management
Technology
Ci s~\ yi /-^ \
\ Ca^ ZVO cvc)
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A s\\ s\~3
t\ ~~O \ ^ O ->
-0\
No.
of Plants
*p
o
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry V\£T/\L
Number of Plants
.S M \UlKi6
I
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model G&W- US X 1C
Production \ , *$> X \^
-A
Date "7/3O/6O
)b tGT/W-^uv£&o>.
^ KT/(V
"
Waste Streams
\\\&( iaa^S
7
1
>
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
"5 ,"700, CCO
No.
of Plants
\
Waste Management
Technology
A-)8
(_ \ (^ \OO o.c)
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-OI
No.
of Plants
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry VW/-\US> HlU\M6
Number of Plants j
o/ll/ou
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date "/
Model (--,u( c\- 3,I* XI QT MT/ ' f - L( lid (.'•/CIW.'.cl
^ . U
Product! on ^.jp XlO
Waste Streams
\N\l\l ^ftxi \ViX5)
a
Ln
uo
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
(0^00,000
No.
of Plants
\
Waste Management
Technology
A- \&
aX*"X _J \
CgO; \ d j acj
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-o ,o^
(f jLVNCfl. \s.ULdc.cl
p l^ i
No.
of Plants
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
<\
6/11/80 ,
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date ~L L~?. 0 ISO
Industry M^TlM
Number of Plants
.S K \kHUh
4
. /I
Model IVdMA - P S.) XlTi MT/ (iT -UUcLjyClY.tU\n
/ Vj ^"^
Production ^ , ^ X UjW MT/L\\/
U
Waste Streams
v\vdl WU^s
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
3,01,000
No.
of Plants
4
Waste Management
Technology
k-\Q
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A.-0\ ,03
No.
of Plants
4
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model |yft\\ -
\T)
1A
6/11/80 , ,
Date -7/3Q/8O
Production
t <>
Waste Streams
tt\m TOAlUx^S
7
T
1
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
3,^^,000
No.
of Plants
\O
Waste Management
Technology
A -A 8
Cl ©300 cxc)
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
k-01,0-5
No.
of Plants
\o
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
6/11/80
Date £
Industry VigTAlS VI \ M\Mfr
Number of Plants
Model 1 \-Qin - \ft X\0
lo ! ,-,-
Production
UT/U\/
Waste Streams
VMlU -f^\U\^S
3
n
r>
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^,1000060
No.
of Plants
•^
Waste Management
Technology
/V-18
^©SSOiXt
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A- 01,o^
-01
No.
of Plants
4
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model Wan- Q\ X
o/ll/ou , /
Date Q ( 8O
I* /
Production QlX\ft^ Hi /U
Waste Streams
mil Wm^
n
n
-j
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^STSpco
No.
of Plants
lo
Waste Management
Technology
A-A8
jQ.acK j
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-01,03
-o\
No.
of Plants
*->
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
VI srTfl IS
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model LlflA - \ • d X
O/ll/OU .
Date l/3Q/fr
Number of Plants
Production l.Q
' i
HT/L ( V
(
Waste Streams
null +av\\vv8
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-0\,cri
No.
of Plants
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
T n H 1 1 Q t1 K* v i l~"~ i"A I ^. 1 I \ K. 1 1 V V i*~i
Number of Plants /
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model Lji.G.A
Production
\ ^ \/ \ j\ *0
-\-d A\L)
1 1 \'\r\^> t\^\~
\<o IsC
/ " '
0
Waste Streams
• 5
3
n
D
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^O.OCQ
No.
of Plants
a
Waste Management
Technology
A- 18
0@lOO etc)
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -01 ,03
No.
of Plants
"7
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
""A
o/ll/ou /
Date 7/.3Q JgQ
Production 4.6 XlO^ KT/UU/
rmuic
Waste Streams
&
3
en
o
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
1 N
No.
of Plants
w
Waste Management
Technology
A-\6
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
1
No.
of Plants
(.
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry Hl-TALS H \M\Ki6
Number of Plants 1
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
n n A
>H
O/ll/OU
Date
f - I.BXiQ
Production
V-VTA.v-
0
Waste Streams
wuU 4cuU\£>
3
%
.1
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
\
Waste Management
Technology
Al ( >*J
1 r^^\.
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-O^o^
No.
of Plants
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry HeTftlS H m V MG
Number of Plants \
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model Kfi\ul)Ao
- 4
o/ll/ou .
Date "7/?,0 I £G
Production 4 X I fr MT
0
Waste Streams
^ wn,
o
1
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
1 1 A\/~V^I rvY^
\\Q OvJU'i1*-'^-'
No.
of Plants
\
Waste Management
Technology
(f;« ^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
j\ — O ' O ^j
No.
of Plants
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No." per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry | | £Tr\L%» M \kl\Mta
Number of Plants 0>i
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model Hf/U i \ubl\U
Production \\ X^C)
" !A
6/11/80 / I
Date 8/1 SO
ivt - \ \ X \ ftk MT/i fy - 1 1 ivdXVUOUP
N-VT/Ci /• °
U
Waste Streams
null A-aAuv^S
•>
i
t
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^A,oo^,coo
No.
of Plants
Si
Waste Management
Technology
A -.16
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
No.
of Plants
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
idustry
jmber of Plants
6'11 '80
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
- "5 AIQ
Production "^ X
Waste Streams
milV -kdvu^s
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
03,000
No.
of Plants
Co
Waste Management
Technology
A-\6
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
Ac-0\,o^
-o\
No.
of Plants
3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
"IA
o/ll/au
Date 1
Industry
\k\\Vif-i
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
ModeiS>\U)4Y -3 KNC^ KT/i\r-
Number of Plants
Production
x / g
KT/U.\T
CJ
Waste Streams
Will H-OjJtui^S)
•}
i
i
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
-7 -so ceo
No.
of Plants
3
Waste Management
Technology
/\-\B
^ \ (^ voo o-^}
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
/\-0\)O'j
-01
No.
of Plants
3-
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model Si liy£V -
Number of Plants
m/ll/~
o/ll/ou ,
Date -7 /3Q g(
/*"> — I ~ l
Production
\ ^ HT/U
Waste Streams
mdV -V^\\w^s
•)
^
i
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
\ ,114,000
No.
of Plants
\
Waste Management
Technology
A-!8
(_ 1 © O-i <*c^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
/\-o\
No.
of Plants
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
"".A
o/ll/ou , /
Date 7/5O/6Q
Industry HCTlM
Number of Plants
V 1
fi
Model~2.vv\C- 3. o Al(
Production 'cK'SXVO
^ j^/^
5 MT/nv,
-\lv\cWCYGiMvi
r
0
Waste Streams
wll HA\\\^
3
3->
»«1
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^O.GOO
No.
of Plants
8
Waste Management
Technology
A--\8
Ci © 100
-------
Industry
Hmmc-i
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model "2: w\c- lo
o/ll/ou
o//ou , /
Date 7/oO/5>Q
Number of Plants
(n
Production
,,., <, . / u
^ MtV
Waste Streams
mil \(ul\v\^
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
0^0,000
No.
of Plants
lo
Waste Management
Techno! ogy
A- V6 .
Cl©V3-i
-------
NONFERROUS MET^L SMELTING AND REFINING
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model |D Alu\Mu\uvVv -L
IA
6/11/80
Date jf In {
Production \ "? 8 . \~74 -\v '.^.-/ • •/
Waste Streams
K^lu^c.
2. POT \i\vavS
MM. QA cxboiA
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
41^^
l^llT
^CLlVJL CUO
Obou^L
No.
of Plants
\
1
A
Waste Management
Technology
A-03^Jtti)
•PI (lOC^lcOy
"^ - 0"^> ^ ^^''^ V
3 \ (voato)
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04
No.
of Plants
|
A
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model ]° Al
Producti on | [p ^
- CbvUu <\v \\ O
6/11/bU
Date u/l-7 / 3Q
Waste Streams
\i ^luiC^CL
0. OyVlvi^vS
^ Q^ abov*.
a
o
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
•^34-
(pA'^S
S&flxJiL 0>0
(xbou-t
Vv
No.
of Plants
\
ID
Waste Management
Technology
/V-Q^Lo^'txO
OH Lu)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model I°A\\UV\\\\\UVV\ ^ r
6/11/80
Date If,
Number of Plants
Producti on J43 (Ml
-
,
Waste Streams
I, ^luck^
*cm. cu> abow
v3 u
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
4 '•loo
Oil JO 0-^
U
No.
of Plants
\
\
Waste Management
Technology
A-Q3-
"8-03^
(N"3 ItfUtf&aV
\c\
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
^04
03'
G- 01,0^,63
No.
of Plants
•1
V
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3
3
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
S.-73
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
/lluw\ii\u^\-liui;
"RA
6/11/80
Date lo/H /
Productlpn 14(o,'!54O
Waste Streams
L ^lu-cKd
^' \
SJ-iVUL Cu3 Q.boo^-
i
ro
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
«, "3(5 3
"2>o3(o
^CLlWL 0/0
cxboi-t
H
No.
of Plants
c2
a
<^
Waste Management
Technology
A-OcX
S -CTif-^^i-O
0~^> lioorio.^
Q-03(.(j^^'^
n'Jj^^'-^^
n
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
~B- o\.oO 03
d-Ol,C31 03
i \
No.
of Plants
3.
«P
^
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Q'
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
q.~7S>
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model )° QftnfV-O'r- Ssi\\C
ftnflJ'
I '
RA
6/11/80
Date C0/1-7 /gO
MtJW/PLJIKMS
Production
Waste Streams
1. jJ^-dtoluTiC V&idUfiS
fcc.vd. plavvL slu^S/O
*a.w. a/> above.
a
i
•-j
00
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
\b8
8.4
^^ M
No.
of Plants
^
\o
Waste Management
Technology
Av-ca
i^r ^\ ^*^ \ (ij
\ "^ ^^ 1 1 "*\ \ ^^1
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
/\-04
"8- 01,00 03
i i
No.
of Plants
"3
\0
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
\
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
e.n
-------
Industry
bM F I- VLO.O U.S,
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model i°
"RA
6/11/80
Date (0/(-/ /i>*v.
. No.
of Plants
1
1
Waste Management
Technology
A-oa
B-03
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
•B-Oi 03.
03
No.
of Plants
\
)
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of
MftkirpK.fcoiA.S
Plants \
~RA
b/ll/OU
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date (c/rf C(j
1/v A T— 1 1 r •«. 1 ' —
/ ' Ai^ i'"\n \f J—^- A / J-i/"! ^ l«^^ i i i * i % f r f, ^»v
i. UUSw." "Cr U Lri ' lv_ I L^.^V\CI C£- Cs
Production ^, Ci"SCj AvM'^A •. \/
' ' 0
Waste Streams
i
i
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
I
No.
of Plants
\
Waste Management
Technology
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -01, 03(
No.
of Plants
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o
tn
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
~RA
6/11/80
Date (v
Production Q £T7 Q 4 3
vj
Waste Streams
1. vJLUe\TO\uV\C Y^ldWi
O
0. ^WcUX-
*uu o^ ofc*.
a
s
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^
(XlOOI^t
No.
of Plants
\
^
I
Waste Management
Technology
A-oa
^-03
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04
"6-01,0^03
' 1
No.
of Plants
\
3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
I
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
s.n
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
~RA
6/11/80
Date (r,l\-ll
Model |° UftftU M^JlQUYl OvCc.
Production \3°l "^"7"S "Ifr'A*
Waste Streams
1, ^lud^-
0. \a^co\ d/X-
WOIY\ ^^vflJttt^
u
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
1393
o
^
No.
of Plants
\
a
Waste Management
Technology
/\-'Q^(ujU£tiL5>
9- 1 Co3tua"tL
11
SL\ Luto/ui.
\ Q
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-o4 01 03
1 /
"S-Oi 6^ 0*3
No.
of Plants
\
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-3.3-7
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
•RA
b/ll/au
Date U /(-?
Prod uct 1 on
I . i "H "TM \S / \ *
U
Waste Streams
3. \Q^OOV\ &uuivws
\ Y 0 ^ ^ l'^ vAXGtY
1)
c»
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
uuo
n«
^0.\M- CX/J
cxbo^
No.
of Plants
l
a
Waste Management
Technology
A~O^UiJfo/5bS
0 1 [uJktf&S)
\q
B-G3l^
9 1 CuxwUS;
n
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -64,01,03
?)- Oi, 03^03
No.
of Plants
1
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
0
a
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-3.JT7
-3.3-^7
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model 1° MM
A
6/11/80 .
Date (j \7 SO
Number of Plants
Production
Waste Streams
YNOVVJL
3
•J
D
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
1
Waste Management
Technology
A-ou
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -00
No.
of Plants
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model 1° IU\/UC:,^HA ^APT t-Yocluc
4
A
6/11/80
Date If. /il /gO
Product!op
4. Oifl
Waste Streams
V\OIVJL
3
3
3
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
4
Waste Management
Technology
A-OCD
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
No.
of Plants
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
"RA
D/ll/OU
Date (W|-/ / SO
Number of Plants
Product! on
Waste Streams
l.lflCcCkuvC vCSiAuA
ol
3. sllLoUL (.UACl, > Co vo\CXi"v'L V^S>^U£-
00 »
SCUV^L (XA C^bot>€.
\ V
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
38^-3O
TTOI
uq
SKk05
u
No.
of Plants
\
Q
Waste Management
Technology
A-oa
•B-o-s
C.- 0*3, I0!
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04
"8-01,0^03
C-o\,oo 03
No.
of Plants
1
1
Q
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
I
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
1 1. "5
-------
Industry
Number of
NOMFe e.^nui^
Plants c<
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model |° tllvu Fb.YCi lLMlC_
0 , 0
Production Sol SlQ'S uj^'3
i
6/11/80
Date (o In IQO
>
L\Y
U
Waste Streams
"t-lwd^ Cmcl. Cd
pw.vt v-e^dua; atvd
p\a\\l Slucij^
I
)
>
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
1^4-1^
No.
of Plants
a
Waste Management
Technology
A-03,fl
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-01^63
No.
of Plants
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
1
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
11, t)
oo
ro
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
Production
:A
6/11/80
, ,
Date (j \1 /ftp
Waste Streams
V\OML
=»
»
jO
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
8
Waste Management
Technology
A -0(0
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A- oo
No.
of Plants
8
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of
KlOUFE \L\£GU 's
Plants 3
!A
6/11/80
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date (^ f (~\ /R.Q
^C> A 1 ">\ H ' ' 0
M r\ f\ a "\ I l-\ \ [ \ V\\ 11'^ i i IA/\ — -vl i l/"/x(C ^ v-X /T> f /* C C* n \ C* *• ^sx
noue i Q/ ^^ 1 UL"I\\» i UL in/v — >ijvcr>is rv(jLf->>Sv,llA\ -^
Production '^'(oc)'^ TC)V'\S/L\V'
' 0
Waste Streams
V\ O IV^L
•3
3
k
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
Waste Management
Technology
A-0U
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
No.
of Plants
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
•Surface Area/
SI (acresl
-------
Industry
M
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
OVF g
Model 3* /I mimmw
6/11/80
Date to /H I PC)
- Mo IA -1^ /o^S fro
Number of Plants
Production
VJ
Waste Streams
Vo V\JL_
3
DO
LH
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
SO
Waste Management
Technology
K-010
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -co
No.
of Plants
3O
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
A
6/11/80
Date
OMf G
Model
ummum-
,
/3O
- i—
Number of Plants
Production P7
Waste Streams
\\0 KSL
i
CO
en
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
l°\
Waste Management
Technology
A -ob
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -00
No.
of Plants
\°\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
P PiZQUS
n
6/11/80
Date
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ^
0 l\ urn in (Jim - KUv-JlVoS.^
, .
/ (-/ /
^li^ - H
Production
o
o
Waste Streams
nou.
3
0
J
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
n
Waste Management
Technology
A -OCc
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-OO
No.
of Plants
\1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
\
6/11/80
Date (Q
Production
Waste Streams
\f\OVvJL
•3
3
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
S1^
Waste Management
Technology
A-ow
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-OO
No.
of Plants
aa
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
" A
6/11/80
Date ^ / 1 7 /
Q° Qop ftJEr - "fi |gy\- "Fu
Product! on (p 4-.
U
Waste Streams
ftitiNCLtfe. soubluLV ducfe
^CUVJL (X/9 &hfilM>
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
1 A ^7
«CA \A\J) QC
CXboLML
No.
of Plants
a
s.
Waste Management
Technology
A-0^
^
B-Ci t \A
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
i-OA^Ol (
03
No.
of Plants
s
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
l
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
0.3-O
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
IA
6/11/80
Date (o
ftQ
Number of Plants
Product! on
QoQOPy- KlaVf- Fii \M-\q CJ?S> -
\ • ,
?> o 4 Ab i'\S/U \T
Waste Streams
sKid1 U.a<£J
S,CL\N^O 0'^> CLlocu^.
1
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
Oi
S^Ll^VJL O/J
No.
of Plants
1
1
Waste Management
Technology
A -oa
3-03, H
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -DA
B-04 01
03
No.
of Plants
I
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
\
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o.ao
-------
Industry I\1C}MFE^\£.OVA^:>
Number of Plants )
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model Q° P(u)Ofi.r - VviTi'
Production "=^~3) ^lo""!
/
:A
6/11/80
Date (f.
^ <: "^ff.n^C \
-W^/u-r
10
H (RC;
I
1 i
o
Waste Streams
rioML
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
\
Waste Management
Technology
A-0^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-co
No.
of Plants
I
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/11/80
Date U ll
^-(L Wnf~-M
Number of Plants
Production
Waste Streams
V^Ol'UL
Quantity
(MT/yr-p.lant)
No.
of Plants
'"S
Waste Management
Technology
A -ob
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -oo
No.
of Plants
-s
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
X>
INS
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model Q(
Number of Plants
b/ll/ou
Date Icj'c-i |5
Product! pn
^s)
Waste Streams
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
Waste Management
Technology
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
/\-oo
No.
of Plants
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
10
co
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model Q°
Number of Plants
Product! on
4 RQ
b/ll/ou
Date In
- XL
Waste Streams
Y^ONJL
3
0
^
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
•5
Waste Management
Technology
A-oio
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-oo
No.
of Plants
^
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/11/80 ,
Date (p/(-7/8Q
Number of Plants
Production
Waste Streams
)T\OIML
3
3
T
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
3
Waste Management
Technology
A-0(*
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-oo
No.
of Plants
"^
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No." per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Kl
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model 0C
6/11/80 ,
Date (j, /(7 f(
fr-M
Number of Plants
Production
U
Waste Streams
noiML
3
3
p>
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
2.
Waste Management
Technology
A'Oto
Applicable Tech-
nic^l Requirements
A-oo
No.
of Plants
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of
fiWFe ft-VLGUS
Plants 4
A
6/11/80 /
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date (f l['l h°,(J
Model Q° Cop pC V- O^OV - S
Production ~?4 "7 TO 1"^^ A l. /
VJ
Waste Streams
rio KJL
3
iD
VI
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
4
Waste Management
Technology
(\ -Olo
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -oo
No.
of Plants
4
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
M
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model PQ ULG.ci -
\
6/11/80 ,
Date I* i-t fi
C - XL
Number of Plants
A
Production
iol4
U
Waste Streams
i. MuSiGW COV\-
4ro\
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model 0° I g PL a ~
6/11/80
Date lf
- L
Number of Plants
II
Productiop Q 4 . 1 4 R
Waste Streams
1, Ssludy.
3, jM\iVs>ion coravol
^CMYJ^- G»/^ Qjoo u°^-
o
1C
vo
u
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
•3? \"^0i
S(X.V\vL OS
it
No.
of Plants
A
4
3
Waste Management
Technology
3 I (.U}w)"U 3)
*2j££S
\
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-0\,03,03
•B-01,03,03
i£-04
No.
of Plants
4
4
3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
I
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o.u*
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
DD/\
U/ J.J./UU
Date Co ) I "7
M^V ik 1 1 "l "~"X I / ^~ . I 1
OWtc^fcfcOU-^ Model 9 k£Aa ~ LJ>3Co
1^0-7
aSU"
n
No.
of Plants
"3
•S
A
1
Produ
Waste Management
Technology
A-G3(vdWtu)
a i (vocxijuoj
^"°?rS
\Q UJ^J
n
C1S)
"^ - (\"3 f LO&jljtL l^/
^ 1 (uJdA^ ^
d5~| (.uiOJJlUji)
ction \O.Ooi H V /u.y
' • o
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A- 01,0303
T>-0\,CP,G3
a-M
No.
of Plants
O
^
A
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
1
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
G.llo
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model 5° JJLdcl "I?a.tfeLM
6/11/80
Date /ll /
Production
o
Waste Streams
1, S,(ucK,^
No.
of Plants
\
1
Waste Management
Technology
j\ "0^> Lw^yttl)
Ql [t06/lll<5 j
"\
S '0^-^^"^'^
3. \ (uj^jUOj
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -01,03 03
jj A\ /A
No.
of Plants
1
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
I
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
O.l(o
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model 5° LfifllA-
6/11/80
Date lo
,
ISO
Number of Plants
Production
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
5>G jjiaci -
A
6/11/80
Date ,
- L.
Number of Plants
Production
VJ
Waste Streams
D
_i
D
*>
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
U
Waste Management
Technology
A-Qlo
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-OO
No.
of Plants
b
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
Date' (1
KJO
- M
Number of Plants
q
Production
O
Waste Streams
nCM-VJL
i
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
Q)
Waste Management
Technology
Ar-OU
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -00
No.
of Plants
^
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
I
_^
O
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model Q^
[A
6/11/80 , /
Date ^ (-] /
8
u
~S
Production \QQ1 "'
u
Waste Streams
V\0\\JL
•3
j
•)
T
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
\8
Waste Management
Technology
A-Olo
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A- Oo
No.
of Plants
1-8
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
ORGANIC CHEMICALS
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
C
uEMVf
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
6/11/80
Date (0 }\{fi I
Model /lc\ulQi.\vVnW • 'P\6i\t A ' Llbwi C'u,.
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
Productiqn
(J.VM
ction
- PWi S^
A
6/11/80
Date (r.
fiQ
RR
Waste Streams
l,QUJ2»\cV\ "You^Y"
* bono\Y\
3. WAVJU j.v\ds
"2> Q^CJno v\ m i Lc.
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
18,300
\l(o
90^, 900
No.
of Plants
1
Waste Management
Technology
/\-$\ loio/itte
34,\U^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-Ol
No.
of Plants
)
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
A
6/11/80
Date (t
O
SL
AJL >
Product! on 1A1.131
Waste Streams
\ » WC.CLM u vJ!A\c^S
ft
0. S\vi(.\VL
"3 au&ivLVv CG\UV\UA
1
A» 0,U^o sVUjp^e.^
^
j
3
3
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
300
ID'S
441,QOO
443,300
No.
of Plants
3
Waste Management
Technology
A-CR Cwft/rts-O
Wl^w
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
ft-04,61
No.
of Plants
"3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3.Lo
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
O.°|
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
tA
6/11/80
Pate
.- \4A\\k iV)l
rUor
Production
Waste Streams
\. IxtGAM JL\iv6S>
(J
3. SUU.WC
3, <5pJUv(- CCLUsllC
-a^ ^
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
A
6/11/80
Date
O.WEMiCALS
(o
I I
Model KMUi\GkimAt MftLd H(iJ\iYiiUmQ-f?f.i\ -'SnviK Hi
Productiqrl
Waste Streams
I, slucl^L
D, U>1CL\C CXCvA,
3> . S (UuvV CXm^tio
A , ^ (Xe. vvt, c (L4- OJLLI s-t
0
7
J
J
>
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
no
U3-4o
-700
<-
No.
of Plants
U
Waste Management
Technology
A -\MuKdM
O*** / j-
C> |^U)CuiUL
4")
PI
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -cxi- 01
No.
of Plants
IP
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
1*\
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
3.4
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
ll\LS
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
6/11/80
Date
Model
^a\\W0<^l(•.•• iC'.f'.vc. /lUvLn>
Production
0.i >-t \_fi V O
111. C? JO
Waste Streams
\i\\iauu JIVM^*
i
-1
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
8-300
£00
No.
of Plants
a
Waste Management
Technology
A-\3
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04
No.
of Plants
3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
f,-,/. [Q
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
A
6/11/80 ,
Date [(, J3(a I %
i i
. . I1™ K f
^A b.hC
Number of Plants
Product!on 48. loQQ KT/U/
I •^ J i i
7 0
Waste Streams
1. l\c.ixou ^-^(is
D, ^luci^
3, CiCj.U(LO
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
A
6/11/80
Date
Number of Plants
Product! on
V)
Waste Streams
o
D.Slu^C
A. co.us.-Kc
Si(xw-fi- &/i cx^oou-C^
o
1
CO
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
-S
1\
l*S^O
- I o(.uJW)ljfS
iq
^ i
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
i
m-oipa
P>- C4(0/
No.
of Plants
3
3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3.1
3.1
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
SA
9.4
-------
6/11/80
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date to/^lo/^G
Industry L) !
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
3.1
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
3.4
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Qti-EM\CALS
EN /MCK
o/ll/ou
Date V
(o
Production Slo OOP KT/4V"
Waste Streams
\,
U
2, t"3)(_ IvjL&OULS
3. VCH Ks-aouL^
4 ^lnckOO
^.\\^i a/)
(Xbou-L
No.
of Plants
3
^>
Waste Management
Technology
A-ft(wGu5tol-
°\
14 [u^O^U 4)
3(^luXUStllS
IS
^4)
R
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-01,03
"B-oijOa
No.
of Plants
-3
"3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3. 1
3-1
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
Q.A
Q.4
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model ^i/mii EbC \ layvfe-
RA
6/11/80
Date Cofc>tr/3Q
0.
Production
KT/
uv
Waste Streams
1, Solved V \VU-Y U)CU5t^
4. QCLUVhc
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
"SO
"b'SO
^143*3
•5-5,000
No.
of Plants
4
1
Waste Management
Technology
A- l^> luO&fltoS 1,
\Ci
"Tfa -\^\ C^0,'jt5^
^(^(vjOOUiXj^
1 Q
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-01,02
No.
of Plants
4
l
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3.1
3,1
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
a. 4
o
-------
TEXTILES
-------
• ..
Industry \ f~ XIIL£
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
:A
6/11/80
Date -y
S>cnaAiv\C - ^^ Th
u-cc
Number of Plants
Production
V.1UA
\r_
Waste Streams
Y\OVUL
)
j
j
j
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
a
Waste Management
Technology
A -Ota
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-CO
No.
of Plants
5
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
IA
6/11/80
Date -
Number of Plants
Production
J4
Waste Streams
Y\(j \\J2_
C /"^ I \ i p \ .» 4— er
DO
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
1 ~5 i
1 o „ |
No.
of Plants
a
\
\
Waste Management
Technology
A-Olo
" ' ]
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-oo
~Ti /\ A
j> - (^Jt-\
No.
of Plants
a
i
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model IjQool ScouJm-\r
~RA
b/n/au , ,
Date -7 I \tfl
- 1 l^tK
Number of Plants
Production
0
Waste Streams
V\D 1>JL
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
a
Waste Management
Technology
A-oc^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-oo
No.
of Plants
^
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
o/ll/ou / ,
Date -7/(8-^
H
No.
of Plants
1
1
a.
i
i
Waste Management
Technology
A'S^
•B-oi, H
fr-oa
^-01, l^
E-oi
J
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-oA
•&.o\,oa
C-OA
i>-01
£ -o;
F-fcl
No.
of Plants
\
I
51
1
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
a
i
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o.-y?
O.TJ9
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model UQoOl
~RA
o/li/ou
Date -ni'
/8O
- H- fi\\cci
Product! on
Waste Streams
^kci^(L
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
4434.4
No.
of Plants
I
Waste Management
Technology
A rOS.iq
to.qa oc")
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A--OV
No.
of Plants
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
1
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o.^a
a
i
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
-,11.- ,
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date "7 / T
Model LOool \-\V\\cJ\ |\i.C - U - ^blKC J"
Production
Waste Streams
"S 1 U.d Vj^
0
sM\5L
o
1X3
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
i\oan
8831. ID
No.
of Plants
\
I
Waste Management
Technology
A -03.
-J, _ O-^ \Q
0-84-oc)
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04
~2>~0 \
No.
of Plants
\
I
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
\
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
1.84
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
t>/ll/au , ,
Date -7/08/66
- ) \\< c
Producti on 34-QQ
Waste Streams
1, Sjud^C
p. Solo-cuH
**CUVJL a
o.baoc
M
No.
of Plants
\
i
\
\
\
a
i
a
3,
\
^
Waste Management
Technology
ft-0£UlO£aO
\ 3 Lu3o5kd;
fl
"S-O\(-^^x-^\
\^llX)(LA,-tiL5
\<\
n>_ Q~~) LyJc*^ts_f
I 3(too^rU2)s
n
^- OS^fl
^ - 0°l , IS
F-01
Gi-0£,i°l
14-03
r»o^,fl
CO- 0^1 OLO
^-o'J^n
R-01
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
4-04-
"S-04-,01,03
d-04-,01
1)'0\,O4
H-O1
«-- 01,03-
&-0^,Ol
H-04
X-Ol
4-0\
V<-OI
No.
of Plants
I
I
1
\
I
a
I
8
a
\
^
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
0
Q
a
a
a
i
a
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o.cn
O.C~7
0.0-7
0.01
0.0-7
o.cn
0.0~7
0.01
-------
Industry
PXTIJJE
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
"RA
u/li/uu , ,
Date -7/3B/5C
c \\ - S iv\\ nlP - SA - 3^ \v-gf "h
Product! on
Waste Streams
^ . C, O I LA \\ \3
^UANVJL ®J^ OJ/DQ 1>C
/
0 V V v I "i i >* III f\ t i
^JC T^ V*^_ 1-* \^ J t V*V. VJ \ S^s
? ^
IV
)\
M
^ 1 VJLQ^P
^(xvNvL ct/^ CL^OU^I
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^11.4
o^- \Cj Q
C CL_V\^ e^}
CL\JOL^L
ii
'\
1 1
o^.a
*SCs. i/vv^ Cc/)
CX. bo Vj"^
No.
of Plants
1
]
\
~5
Waste Management
Technology
|^ -Q^ (.LOOjEtc ft
\^> (.LO^U.t))
i Q
Q — 0 1 CujCu~l£L 1
1 d> Cu)W."1S.3y
C*'08,fl
^-ll.fl
E -01, 1^
F-0\
Gi- 03-
W - OS ( ft
X-01
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-o4,ol
i_J5 r\/\ \ \ \
V^ » ^ [ )^-i" \^j \
_ ) )
d-OA-,01
b-CX\,0|
E-0\,G3
F-01,0^
6-04
H-OI
JT-O)
No.
of Plants
1
1
1
1
1
1
"5
1
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. oer
Plant
a
Q
a
a
9.
1
•Surface Area/
SI (Acres)
0.37
0.-S7
0.3~7
O.-STf
0.^7
0-0-7
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
Date
Production
Waste Streams
U ^luc^C
5, <;olunrico
^kd^L
^(X^VJL CuO G.\300^
•D
—t
n
»i
^lu d^C.
C.CLU^. CLO aboi^
V t
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
8^A.5
•^o.-s
SS4.3
^CLJVV^. cxy^
alooo^
1 1
U834.4
•SCLvya. ay)
(ibo^
\l
No.
of Plants
\
1
\
3
1
I
1
Waste Management
Technology
A -"O^fuODudu")
1"5 llOWil^J
fl
^-0^^°(
C^13
J3-03L
E - 0^ , \S
(O.^ac^
P-o-]
£n- O"',^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04-, 0 1
~B-Oi,03i
d-04
t>-O4
E-OI
F-0\
Gi-01
No.
of Plants
1
1
I
3
1
I
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
a
i
a
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
0,ci3.
oaa
0.c|-9.
O.0!^
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
PRA
ll/
Date-7
i . i
- <& \VC.rt
Product! on R'SQQ V.UV' -./
Waste Streams
L M^l^-h,
.
Ss 1 L^ Q ttf
_, "^CL Uv^t Gy^ CXrJCilA-f
o
r>
Si a d \^-C
Quantity .
(MT/yr-plant)
3441. A
8. ^
3441. a
so.ua ay^
No.
of Plants
\
a
Waste Management
Technology
A - otsjo^O
' p'(uiL^
H W J J
V
C, - di , i°(
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -01 }&\
B:^'°SC.^
Q.-o\
No.
of Plants
\
1
\
\
\
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
1
1
3
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
O -^~7
0.^-7
0."V7
-------
Industry_
Number of Plants
•• /^l lnn
uate i
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model UloiuEu- OomoJpy.- H-
Production
•safln
Waste Streams
I. sUc&yL
1, Sol^CK'Hi
"bluosj3
oJcJO \jJi
^•$.0
C^X l-lvJi. QjQ
No.
of Plants
1
i
1
4
\
1
Waste Management
Technology
A-0-S^uo^uO
I ~^> (uOcus^i.^'
l^
~P - C\ ~~1 \^1
C-o-5, ^
1
D-oa
"E -03, v°\
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -01. 04
)
"B-Ol
-0^,03
^-04
E -04,01
No.
of Plants
I
1
3
1
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
1
a
\
3
Surface Area/
SI (acresl
1.84
1.84
1.84
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
(rrXTILr--^ Model lOoi^tU -
f Plants _J Production Q*} .
Oan\0kv
aco K
b/ll/bU
Date ~7 i
< - L-. -- 2i
1 b/uiv:
3^/eo
vr€Ct"
Waste Streams
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
I °
No.
of Plants
\
Waste Management
Technology
A-c-s
. C3£>8 oc)
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A--o\
No.
of Plants
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
I
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
3.08
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model L^QLU \\ - "£).(• c-.(-) UA C -
b/ll/BU
Date ~
Producti on
-i i/
1 V
Waste Streams
I, MixtacL.
Q . SoKuL i\c\*\,
^d \Yv-Q. OuO (X bo ^ i
^V- CJL p ^, S l^1- o ^(L-
\3 0
^kcV
uuu. ^ aUi*.
vv
'«
l\
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
78"3. 6
'B.'b
lr^"7D 4
W-/G ,4
•—7 0*3 .0
/O o- O
(xbou-c_
l^
41
u
No.
of Plants
i
\
1
I
I
a
a
3
I
1
Waste Management
Technology
f\ - Ot) (uM4l£f
_ /
n
-b . A-7(iOftjUD
ntMJM.3
y '^
G-Ol.l0!
3)-oi,rt
Ef* ^"^
- O ^
F^oa,\°i
/ /^*\ ^"^ 1 Lji
i *"*n * • " ( ) iN 1 I
H -09, 1QI
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04.01
j
3-O1 ,04-
)
C-01
i-o»,oa
E -04
F-04,01,05
-04,01
No.
of Plants
\
1
1
3
Si
1
a
I
i
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3
3
3
3
3
3
^
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
0-~3l
0.31
0.31
O.~31
o."Si
O.V7
0.-31
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
5/11/8U '
Date RQ
Industry !PXT\LtS>
Number of Plants \ C)
Waste Streams
\ . *5> k^dv
^>CXV\vJL «3 ,
"^>- C~^tuM^- ^ j
\"^)(uMtL3-j
^0
a-o^«
u-o^
E-0^(\<\
F-08,^
y
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04,O1
"B-01,04
G-01,0^
^-04-
E-O^Ol ^
r,oA,oi
No.
of Plants
\
\
^
a
3
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
Nor per
Plant
3
^
^
"3
3
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
0.^
c.^
0.^9.
o.s^
o.^a
-------
Industry
FKTIl FS
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
RA
6/11/80
Number of Plants
Product! on RQ 1
Waste Streams
\ % S> I U c\Sfi-
P% SsG\l>-tVAT^i
^CiNvoL CLO ccboUJl
l^Cl^ ^luc\\£
oo
^G. VlvfL CLO (X \jo i>C
11
v. V
'.
*N\ v.^c_\\!^
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
Ul'SS-O
13.1
•SA^^O.O
bl^.O
SOLVIVJL Ct>0
GJoot1^
vv
M
M
Ho.
of Plants
\
\
V
a
A
3
\
\
1
Waste Management
Technology
A — Oot f w)W"t5- \ )
iO
"&-0"ltuft5ki|
I3(«iutea)
0 - ("} \ \Q
^-0^
E-Oa \S
^-08^\°i
G-HN\°i
H-
-------
nn,A
u/ ll/
Industry ~] £XT1LE"S
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date
Model Ui\( V. - *X \V\-\ OU ~
Number of Plants
Production
V \
u
Waste Streams
0 <^O \\j^C\. \T\^s
^(JL \\V£__ Oj(i (XUOU^-i
JL Y. dLljt, S> I L^ci OL-
^lu^e.
SGivvoi
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
6/11/80 ,
Date *7 / q £, /6Q
Industry
\ py.T(Ll:-S
Number of Plants \ c>
Waste Streams
1. ^(U
Q- so
Xi,
JLVLCt.pt ^(UcU^
? ^1U^C\<
uJ
SCUM o
us cxbou^
\ \
"
*MVL
^Uv\\C_ cufy C-cl}Ov>Q
\
V
Quantity
(MT/yr-p.lant)
r-s.o
o 1 / O* ^^
0 *• vO • /
S(X.^VJJ. CbO
cx.bo v/^
u
X «
3iT3.lo
S^CL v\vJL CvvO
(x k) o v>-Q
i\
No.
of Plants
1
1
1
\
1
Q^
4
1
1
Model
Vurl
-VjvoOlc- H- ^O^vCf-t
Production \ A . "S *7 "5 klb/LU/
Waste Management
Technology
I """jliOCutlc)
"3 - O *5 (.UJcvjtt ()
^0< (0 S). 0^-CL-)
\ i(i.OCoj(j Q j
\ ^
a-oi,^
D-O^
E-U
F-O^L
6 -G-S ( 1^
H-on
X-o-i.iR
vj
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
fa - O4- 0 \
•B-0\,04
a-oi,
03-
Tb-01
E.-04
F-04
-Ol
,0-2,
H-OI
r-o
No.
of Plants
\
1
1
i
^
"3
1
\
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3
3
3
A
3
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o.ua
o.^
o.ka
O.C.3.
0-^
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model K V\ l
"I A
o/ll/ou
Date -;
I \\ \
- ^ - O \ v
Production
Waste Streams
I. SlucKjL
X ^olL^vTb
^>luc\VfL
o
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
WaS . (o
W O " *
\ ^D ^» OvO ' C^
"S,Cu \VJ2_. OL/O
CtloOL/ML
No.
of Plants
\
I
1
I
Waste Management
Technology
l\ ""0 »! (lOM ULI
\'^(u)^iSti?/^
. 1 V
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-o4,0\
"E-0\
CL-0 I
No.
of Plants
1
1
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
3
a
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
3.08
^.08
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
• A
fa/ll/bU
Date -/
Industry
£VTIL £
Number of Plants
Model \\ fl" - 0 CM \
Production "3^4 -J Uil)/. '.
Waste Streams
L Slu6\Q.
Q. SolL^llb
slud^L
so-v\^.c (\,o aboi^d
^j
i
w ^
tn
^luc\^
SOLi\vJL OL/^ abouJL
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
6b.4
--6-3L
86-4
c^nKii oai
a\oou^
\ V
"701. a
^XIAVJl ^
CvlOC) i^t.
No.
of Plants
^
\
\
\
a
i
Waste Management
Technology
A'6^)(^^0
l'3(^5liL^
i-0\,0^
0-04
"i> -04
B-CM
F- 01
No.
of Plants
\
1
1
1
a
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
a
i
^
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
O.l^
C.lo
0,1^
0.1-5
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
fa/ll/bU ,
Date 7 [ ^ .^' / $
n
- K- & \\-ecV
Production fi7 f T^) V \ h /
U
' v)
Waste Streams
\, sluAvc.
3. soliMVv.~H>
S>lu.cK.(L
i
£ ll
*5> I VJL cl\.(L-
^G.ua GUO a.boo^
^
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
9H.O
l.T
PH-0
*£bou^
VI
\ ( Ovo • ^
C(_^v\vJJ_ Ct/3
A 1 r) (jJ2
"
No.
of Plants
1
1
I
1
I
Waste Management
Technology
' » ^*^C7*
. 'I3U^
^-Ol.fl
0-OQ
tb -oa, i°i
E-0~/
F-0-/,\9
G-o^(\^
(6.^.7
-------
Industry
p VCT\l
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model km"^.- 0
"1A
o/ll/ou
Date —j
Number of Plants
v
- L -D v \-edr
Production
k\li/UYr
Waste Streams
0 . S> d 1 U-C. I'V r^
S 1 ^A<^ \Q
g S u.d y£-
o
•J
SG.U\I QJ^ aboiA
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^Q/6
34°\.3
91S4-. 4
No.
of Plants
1
\
^
1
Waste Management
Technology
/-\ - C)^- (uXi/TtG 0
\ ^) (uXWftt 5 )
i Q
•B'OA
r\ » (x
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model U V
Ad.- \\f
~RA
o/li/au
Date -?7)R
10 v
Production
\RR
' V)
Waste Streams
U sluc^c
P. SollM^H
"S luckjL
o
1
(L
Q68.4
^LLtoi
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
innr\ i
U.,l -
~RA
b/ii/au
Date
P>V
- H - J) \'r€C^
Number of Plants
Production
3400
Waste Streams
Stacks
0
J
)
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
b-S."5
No.
of Plants
I
Waste Management
Technology
A-oa
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
K-04
No.
of Plants
I
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
i
OJ
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
"A
b/ll/au
Date
QaA.fi A-~
V
Production (o IC^
Waste Streams
\ . ^ \ VA. ^/"~
3 CaOlvMUv3
-sU<,c
S(X\VJL Q.^> CXbo^Q
— i
i
u
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^'o
\83.3
^bS^°
tv
u
V-\-S8A
No.
of Plants
\
1
3
1
\
Waste Management
Technology
|\. - 03 tolto l)
\ o (uicujtii' 9 j
lO
^-61,1*1
c,-oa
^ -o°i , ^
rj" A. r\ i c\
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04-,01
•B-o\,03.
0 — f ^ 4-
"i) -Ol
E -0^^1,03
No.
of Plants
\
1
a
^
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
A
Si
5l
a
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o.«
0.1-5
0,1-1,
0.1-6
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
~1A
b/ll/au
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY Date ~]_
Model flftjiftf-b- H- ll)\r(L
so.
Production OfV IfY)
'
Waste Streams
°**^
^lujKc-
0 ^ 1 kd ^p
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
n'ai
•S47. 0
No.
of Plants
\
\
\
Waste Management
Technology
%
J
B-ca
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04,0 1
13-04
C.-OI
No.
of Plants
I
I
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
a
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o.>7
G.~*>7
\
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
!A
6/11/80 / |
Date -7/^q J.«?Q
\\-ecf '
Production
7.QQO
Waste Streams
SLlvdly~
^\uclvc
)
J
»
>
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
i-s-si.^
13,410.4
No.
of Plants
1
1
Waste Management
Technology
ft-oa, ici
"B-o-?,^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
/\-04^0\
B-OI
No.
of Plants
1
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
3
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o.c,a
o.^a
i
no
-------
Industry 1 trXTlUr^
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
cr-M i ' \/ O -r\
i Model ^tOCX l, YCutl\- >>- ,-U;
Number of Plants Q \
Waste Streams
lo,1&,
^(A\ML QjQ 0^boi)4L
SCI \v>A CU) cxbo^i ,
*=. iuc\ML
^Q \V4. CuCi CLbo\>-Q_
11
11
u
S. \uduL
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
4 . 0
S>CLIY^JL QJ$
cxV)0 w*^-
4<».a
bl.U
cx_ioo^
VI
\\
IV
4^3.8
No.
of Plants
I
1
\
a
u
4
i
\
e/ii/au , /
Date 1 l^r\ I^O
t ' '
Production 4^3CI l
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
PRA
-,11,.. ,
Date -7/gey
Production
Waste Streams
1, Q I^VJL QA OL\DO^(L
0
•e» u
^udy.
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^
\<^ZL Oi
9>d IA^JL o^O
cxlpoo-^_
n
v\
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
o/ll/ou
Date 1
Industry |F-)O"/LE^»
Number of Plants L0
Waste Streams
3 . SO 1 VA£ U \v>
SlacfoL
S>Cfc\VJL OoO Ojoou^.
o
Slucfef
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
04S.^
34-S.4
cx.bou^-0.
n
iq^.-a
^(X\i\^ii o^
CXVjou^L
No.
of Plants
I
1
1
\
\
Model
^fedc^, VOAU- U -^\\£ca\ '
Production 1 8 . C) "^ "i Vlb/LA/
Waste Management
Technology
A - OS fi-o&rtt- 1>
1 o(uMA& 9.)
1 ^1
~$>-o\ } iS
c-oa
^'OS,\Gl
E -Ol
u
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A ^C\£\ S\ \
Q~ O 1 \ vJ C>^
A /x ^i.
Y\ _-/"\^4 () \
F-oi
No.
of Plants
I
\
I
\
I
I
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
3
£
2
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
O.W-
G.l^
O« IP C7-
O- L9 ^L
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
"RA
u/ll/ou
Industry
POCTILE-S
Date
M-v YL -Ib
Number of Plants
Product! on 3*7.^00
Waste Streams
l.^liukc,
3. ^ollAOTi*
^luci^L
•taUVXVJl O<3 fl.ljO^C_
0
-4^
w w
SUd^L
SCittML CJ^ Q.bCi^
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^,-74 , st
9^1-.^
31^. a
sa\i^jL o^o
b\00l>4-
\. V
3^3^
^LMvJl OuO
OL^OW^l
No.
of Plants
1
\
\
\
\
\
Waste Management
Technology
A-oat*^
\"3(uWUM
i°,
•s-oi^0)
a- oo
^D -OS , \°l
E-01
F-GI^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
l\ -03,01
"B-01,0^
C-04
^>-04,OI
E-OI
F-CM
No.
of Plants
I
I
1
I
1
I
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
a
Q
2
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
0 .CQ
o.^a
O.°Q
O.CQ
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
"RA
O/ll/BU
Date —i
Producti on 4ic.^CN)
Waste Streams
qoluai-b
VNOM.
0
1
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
4.1
No.
of Plants
St
8
Waste Management
Technology
A-Po
"B-Ob
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-o4
S-oo
No.
of Plants
a
8
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model M m'\ i no D-P w - H -
RA
6/11/80
Date 7 /
\ v-£CrV
£Q
Number of Plants
Production
Waste Streams
noivJL
?
j
k
3
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
£
Waste Management
Technology
i\-0(c
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
ft-oo
No.
of Plants
2
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
I P
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model PjJ)kc! fab /it ~
RA
6/11/80
Date 73
Number of Plants
Production
A DO
U
Waste Streams
Sol^-^ArV^
wotxa.
o
-pa
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
OA
^^•^•^
No.
of Plants
\
3
Waste Management
Technology
A--.V2,
TbrOU
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04-
^'D0
No.
of Plants
1
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
D/ll/OU
Date
Industry
- H - 3fr\
Number of Plants
Production
SQQ
Waste Streams
v\o^_
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
\
Waste Management
Technology
/\-.ou>
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
rVCO
No.
of Plants
\
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per •
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
i * *
tn
o
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model I
'RA
6/11/80
U/ 1 LI 0\J I I
Date "7 / 33 / /?Q
c^ \ fH
- N- vvcuv-eri
Number of Plants
n
production
u
Waste Streams
•solutvch
KbivJL
o
i
en
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
-5. a
~- —
No.
of Plants
i
IP
Waste Management
Technology
f\~33
&-6lo
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
B-OO
No.
of Plants
I
lo
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Tf-
XTII F
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
D/ll/OU , i
Date 7 p<\ I flfi
SLcQULYUV? -H- \VvAv)
c~>
Number of Plants
Product! on
\<\P/L\ \T
Waste Streams
\AO\UL
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
3
Waste Management
Technology
A-G^D
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -co
No.
of Plants
^
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o
I
en
ro
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model ( JL)OQ \
D/li/OU
Date
\ v\\^cU(L
D. ^oloAvfe
C.OL^vJL CXy^ aU6u^
^Ol04\\^
sSlucia
w 0
!AWl CUO abOD^
IV
^biML
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
68.^
\.a
OLIIU CLQ
(Xfcvj^
\.a
88.q
Qauu a/}
(Xboo^l
v«
No.
of Plants
1
\
\
I
\o
\
(o
Waste Management
Technology
A-0a(WMtM)
VSluociMta)
B-oa y-\3
i-03, fl
B-OS
r-u,\s
G-o(o
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04,01
"&-04
-Q-6^ ' ~
^"0^,01
IF-04
F-04,01
G-oo
No.
of Plants
I
1
1
{
10
\
(*
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
^
^
a
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
o-oa
o.os
o.os
-------
Industry
Ti-
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/j.i/oJ
Date 7/;
\ v\ vS \ v\vv ~ H - 1 \A d i v
Number of Plants
Production
Vib/U\/
Waste Streams
2). SiOlL^UT2^
Slud^L
ViOKJL
o
en
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
8-4*
^(^
No.
of Plants
\
I
3.
Waste Management
Technology
. V
-B'G^
G-OU
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
B-m
d-00
No.
of Plants
I
I
a
Treatment /Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Arec
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
p XT 1 L trS Model 1 UOO 1 r i v\ v
-------
Industry
ig
HE
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
Date
xdo - ^ - \
Number of Plants
Producti on
\
Waste Streams
\. S>l^6vJL
D. ^olo^VK
SQ.IHJL ^ \
'V\OI\.CL
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
QO.O
\,0
^dd^a M
aljo^CL
1-0
30. 0
SAlWJL 0/i
(XUoot
\ V
No.
of Plants
1
1>
A
Si
1
13
as
Waste Management
Technology
A -oa (.uMtn
\-3 IwcwU j.)
^
^-O^f-uoartw
\"2>Cu»jrfe<3
C.- l^o
^-\\
E-o^,\°i
r-o5
Gj-oCo
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
fl-04-,0l
^>-04-
C-04
^-0^\-
E-04,0\
F-OA-
G-OO
No.
of Plants
I
3
4
a
i
\3
98
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
1
1
Surface Aref
SI (acres)
O.03-
O.OSk
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
llloMLVl-
6/ii/oU
Date
-M-WAUht
Number of Plants
Production
Waste Streams
\. Sluckc
5. soliwh,
SCUVJIL CLO Q-bo 1 ud^C.
SCL^VJL GJ^ aboi^
Iv
\\
cJ^d^CL
\\OIUL
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
Md.O
<^.8
Sana, a/)
aboi>-5.
4,8
qe.o
^ai'U a^
(Xboi^
i «
1 1
764-0
No.
of Plants
1
"3
-~>
\
QQ
\
I
1
41
Waste Management
Technology
A-OQtuJd/MaO
V3tuxu)ti^
IS
^,-00. ^^"^^
\ 3 Cuwtt a)
C^3
^-03^1^
£-03i
P-ll
G-\\,\^
""tO,C>B
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
?RA
6/J.J./OU
Date -
Industry
Number of Plants
Model [iloo-f'M- Simple- U- L
Producti on 5 9 . "76 8
g
Waste Streams
\, ^luckjC.
0. ^ol u-C. verb
*?AUML oJ} cxtjou^
Sol ^ iv T ^
en \
00 °
SP.IVSJ. OA abo^
n o i v_o
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
413, -5
S,CLU^L O/)
CUoou^
30.3
41-3.5
^^^
No.
of Plants
5
rf
1
Waste Management
Technology
f\-(^iv*U$Z-\}
[*5LujOLO'tp3\
\ S
7> , A^ ( lOGuGfo-O
\LP ^/cx v
Q- 13
0>-c^
E-.lt
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -o4, o
"B-04
C.-04
^-04
^-04
F-00
No.
of Plants
1
3
-7
14
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
1
•Surface Are<
SI (acres)
0.^0
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/j.i/ ou
Date ~7
Product! on__4Q)QO
J
Waste Streams
1. skcke
o. *oluA\-h>
SQ \\x. o^ abouo.
S,ok^vv\"^
£ SluickJL
tn ^
<£)
S.a\,N\JL GL/^ dboLR
vv
nc>\\jL
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
133.
a.boi^L
VI
No.
of Plants
I
1
\
5
4
I
13
Waste Management
Technology
A-03liOftAtM)
V3[uua/fe^
'B-o^^wtii;
\3Lu)wta3)
0.-\3
3)-OS , ^
E-0^
F-ll,^
(9, -0(o
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04,0)
xn
Ci-o4
i) -0^,01
-04,01,03
£-64
F-04,01
6-00
No.
of Plants
1
1
1
i
i
4
1
13
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
I
!
1
Surface Arec
SI (acres)
O-08
0.0£
O.QE
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model I
JRfl
6/ii/oO
Date 1
-VU U\C\UCClT
Production I ft. 34 I Mh/(.K
I ' n
Waste. Streams
3. ^o|u4\\"vb
v^* w abc**
SOfls-Q \\A~*S
? S I ui ck (L
i—" A
O"i
%
-------
Industry
E %T 1 1 b
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
S Model IfWflw- GbmOlox-
Number of Plants 1 (o
Waste Streams
3 A'otXxH
•aolwivte
<,kcV^
P'SCv. \lV_Q. &J^ cxtaou^
_t
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
V4^^
4-7. "5
ISbS.^
"SMVvJL Q/i
(X b 0 (&
No.
of Plants
I
I
4
•°R,"
"6/ii/ou / /
Date ~7/3ci /«SO
\ \v\c.l\l'-£Ct
Production O ^ Q,OG klll/M/
Waste Management
Technology
'A~3c.U)kytA,3
"£- \3
\^ — Ool VI
Jj " ^ C"
1 ' \)
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04,01
^-04-
CL^O^- o\
*>\ -Q4
E -oo
No.
of Plants
1
1
1
4
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
\
1
•Surface Area
SI (acres)
o.^
0.99-
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
'U \MvI-\V J
6 / j. i / ou .
Date *7/23J
Production
.\v\e
: - $>- WcUvgcV
K\b/
/
Waste Streams
sSoltfc-K
^Ck. H\JL. ci/^ Cibo i>Q.
^oMiv-K
0 _ \
ro "
sanM 0,0 abo^
"
n £) ^vfi_
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
8.4
Sid IW(L CuO
OLOOI^^
8.^
4W.O
QllA^L Ci/3
"
No.
of Plants
\
I
1
\
3
Waste Management
Technology
A ~0c) IvcWJ^-O
V"~^ Cwdoit^D •
n
13("jw>ii3j
0- I "5)
:D-G^ \s
E-O^
!p_ |l \°\
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04,u\
3-04
Q.-CA
^5-04,01
£-04
P-04,01
6-00
No.
of Plants
I
1
1
3
1
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
a
a
Surface Area
SI (acres)
0-16
O.i8
0-18
-------
Industry
i P
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/j.j.foO , i
Date 7 /CjC( /
Number of Plants
10
Production Q 3
~-
Waste Streams
L ^lucUe.
Q.SoV^WT^
Solu^\\-K
S L^ckcL
l'
°^a \\viL ^ abo^
CT>
oo
\^0lv.^
Quantity
(MT/yr-p.lant)
\W9.^
91."^
Sl.'S
11^3.5
Ssd.ua cuo
aloou^.
No.
of Plants
1
I
1
5
3
Waste Management
Technology
fV-O^tuxAi)
fiLuoadO)
l°l
^-G
e-os,^
Tb-oa
E-CXo
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
/V-OA-,0\
2-c.q-
C-OA-,01
^-oq-
b-OO
No.
of Plants
I
\
t
3,
^
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
a
•Surface Arec
SI (acres)
0.4C,
O.4U
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
-OR"
"6/n/eO
Date "7 / 7f ; /R
' L'
Production
^W I
^ Wl) / < /
Waste Streams
Si.^SU
\AC}ML
o
1— 1
01
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
"l\.\
'
No.
of Plants
1
O
Waste Management
Technology
toluXurU 0-)
JQ" Ou)
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
ft-OA-,01
^-00
No.
of Plants
I
3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
a
•Surface Are«
SI (acres)
\/54
-------
Industry
>T\? KTI
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model \l\\\\- -
6/n/au ,
Date "7/33 jfiQ
Number of Plants
Production
1QQ
Waste Streams
. siuA
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Wm-1- -
-PR A
Date' "
- \nr\u-crf"
Production
Waste Streams
.Slacks.
a solans
^X\M ao a.bo^
Solo^vvK
E Slvxcko
CTi <3
a>
•ocx i\vx a/^ aboiM.
i \
Y\0\\JL
Quantity
(MT/yr-p.lant)
33-7.8
T.fc
*SCtv\\JL 0>2)
a\ooi>-^
^7-8
337.8
sav\vJi a/)
abou^>
it
No.
of Plants
\
.5
b
A
n
i
"?Lo
Waste Management
Technology
A -03 (wxwfoi)
\'3lu)curts^
' 1°!
"B-G3l.u)^t\
l2,tuXU5kS)
C-l^
D>6D,\q
E-Cf^
F- II, fl
G-OC3
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-oA-,01
^-0^1-
Q-04
i-ol,oi
-04,01,03
£-01
F- 04,01
$-00
No.
of Plants
\
*$
U
i
i
1
-SL,
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
\
i
1
•Surface Arec
SI (acres)
0. \Q
O.18
0-(8
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/11/00
Date
, ,
~ ?;c{ /
u 1 4. -S>\ \fl\plji - L - \ Kr\ I \-e c"\
Production
\4, R
Waste Streams
LSlu^UL
3.^ol^in^>
sai\v£L a/) abou^
salu^w^
i ^ ' ^eV
sa\\\.d a/i a \cjoufi.
hblvJL
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
^105.8
iT), a
sai\^L cuo
a^o^.
\3>.^
40S.8
^0
v3(uwti!3)
11
3-os(u*wtiO
ll>(ul(W^9^
e-\"2,
D-OS
F-\\
F-Olo
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04, 01
"43-04
a-o^
^)-o4
E-O4
F- 00
No.
of Plants
\
\
3
3
1
31
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
\
Surface Arer
SI (acres)
0."3C
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
Production
t\D/U
V
Waste Streams
o . sol^^~H>
SO \\)4MvH
skd^L
I ho \\fi-
CO
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
-sb',-1
3.6
3-8
-58. 1
— .
No.
of Plants
a
\
A
\A-
Waste Management
Technology
A-03 (.lOOJtdl ),
1'3 (.uoojyU^
fl
•5-\3
o-os,^
Cb-OCo
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
fl--o4^oi
"B-D4
-04,01,0^
"3) -00 '
No.
of Plants
I
a
1
14
ireatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
\
\
Surface Are
SI (acres)
0-05
o.oe
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/n/dO ,
Date "7 3C\
- H-
Production
Waste Streams
1, SslucWs.
0, 'SobcVh)
SolulvvVs
SlujW
\->
en
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
l
-------
Industry
Ib
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model W\\lA- ~ VO\N\Oi.( £.-
PRA-
6/n/oO
Date ~
Number of Plants
Producti on
5 1
"
Waste Streams
5.1olX-h
SolWATb
Slu _Q^
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A- 04, 01
^-04
G-04,01
3>-CO
No.
of Plants
\
1
\
q
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
I
1
Surface Arec
SI (acres)
0.4^
O.4(o
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
0 / J.JL / OU
Date
Number of Plants
Production
Mil
vj
Waste Streams
\, SlucluL
^olwUv-K
SAA\a cuO a\ooi^
vv
E SoM\\~K
«vl
Si uc\\^9_
^av\a QUO abolM.
ll
^OivJL
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
cPG-a
1.0
S>ai-iL^ axo
aboo^
Vv
1.0
ao.a
^av\^L coO
alooi^
u
No.
of Plants
•3
\£>
\
\o
3
1^
1
94
Waste Management
Technology
P\ -03i Iw&MJL^
.y3 (u)OA-ki.3>)
19
"B - 03 (^c^
l"3fuXU^3)
(^_ |\ UoOLfltdr
\3 1 100^3)
IS
i-lB
b-09^ IS
F-os.
6-1 ^
H-OU
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04-,0\
-OA-,01,03
6-OA
0-OA-jOl
i>-ov
F-04
Gi-O4,01
H---00
No.
of Plants
u
l
CD
1
10
"3
\a
i
<\4
Treatment /Storage
Surface Imooundrr.ents
No. per
Plant
1
1
\
\
Surface Area
SI (acres)
O.o^
0.0^
o.oa
o.o^
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
G/L
Industry
O/J.J./UV / »
Date 7nc\ I £0
Model lAll - l-iT.ACL'i U - VU 1 l\dlr£CJ '
Number of Plants
Production
Waste Streams
L S> I vx C\A C.
^CL\W5L CL-0 oTfot/1
-=solL>-CiK l"3
•£ ^UC^CL
V\ O WJL.
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
<^|^,0
/^ ^v
^F ' C"
CJULIV^. OuO
cxto^-
g.a
44. 0
No.
of Plants
\
\
\
a
Waste Management
Technology
A ~ O'c) (uJft./)bL 1 )
1- -^(lAJCuKo 3")
\^- £)^)( uJ^jU | J
1 •5(tuMUi3-)
C- I"!)
D-oa
H -OCo
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-O4,O\
B-o^
C-04
05-04
e-oo
No.
of Plants
t
\
Si
\5
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
1
-
Surface Area
SI (acres)
0-CT3
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/11/80
Date *
/
3Gt / 6Q
Number of Plants
Production
Waste Streams
o>liicKC_,
no*JL
i
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
U3.1S
No.
of Plants
a
Waste Management
Technology
/-\ ~ (j ol
o ~~ O Co
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
P\-04
"fc-CXD
No.
of Plants
a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/ii/oO
Date_7_p
- Udvved-
Number of Plants
n
Production
Waste Streams
solwivh
\A (~\ \\_Q
0
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
g.io
* —
No.
of Plants
"^
w
Waste Management
Technology
k- Pj
>J3 " 0 Co
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-o4
3-OO
No.
of Plants
3
\4
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
•Surface Are£
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
I g
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model ftOAAfck- M- lvuli\-£d~
6/n/oO
Date
Number of Plants
6Q
Production 3ft. 1 QQ
- ~
Waste Streams
So k/^. \\~\~s
Y\ OKi^
o
I—.
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
n.q
^^^^—
No.
of Plants
3
3O
Waste Management
Technology
A -.13
"8-0(o
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
3-00
No.
of Plants
3
ao
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No.' per
Plant
Surface Aree
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
p>
E"*TILE^> Model I'QJV
_j Production
pjrt - L - \
^"3, loOO V
PR;
6/ii/bU ,
Date *7/"3C
Y\dvvect '
JloAiiT
/ ij
1 \?>^
i
Waste Streams
solwwhs
~Y\ (xl'\JL
o
1
t— '
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Industry
E-y.TU.EL
Model
( V S - \
"RA
O/ll/OU
Date "7
Number of Plants
Production
1948
' 0
Waste Streams
\ . S I luU (L
3,S>olvhhri'r;>
SUNvfl. C^A O.taou-0-
\\
0
^c^
S>|UC\UL
^Jucl^S. 3
M^uT
u
1.1
asa.4
3-S.-5
^CLU\JL o/o
(.u)0i/rl&-on
\ 9
05-13
E-O-S
F-03, \°1
G-oa
H-U, ^
J_-0(o
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
~G^( ^^ C)"^)
B-04
a -04, 01
1) -01-
E-Ol
F-O^.OI
6-04
H -04,01
x-oo
No.
of Plants
4
\
1
4
16
i
54
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
I
1
1
1
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
O.03
0.03
o.o^
O-0~i
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/1JL/OU
O/ll/OU / ,
Date "7/QCj 1 fi
- M- \\VC\VVeCJi
Number of Plants
Production
80
U
Waste Streams
L Mu6vc
^OL\NML CLO (Xloot/^.
^olwH\is
00 - 0
?Ju.ck,(L
S&NV& dO CL\3ou»4L
IV
V\O|v£.
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
*A'.O
•sOAYJl. COO
4-O
(,^
U
No.
of Plants
QL
.a
3
1
a
•n
i
28
Waste Management
Technology
A* 0
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
6/j.i/oJ
Date
. i _
u - \v\rli\-ef
Production
Waste Streams
LS udvt
3.solu-ewh>
^CA^VJLOA aboue.
^oWvv\^
S slacks
io V
SCUM Q/i <*Jjou4
U
V\Olv«L
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
\8R.^l
^.•5
^aiivjL cto
a.boi>^.
q.^
iffi-4
saua c^>
abo^
\»
No.
of Plants
\
\
Q
I
Si
4
n
Waste Management
Technology
A -03 IvOfcfftSLO
^3 (vowit( a)
"B-03tvOOAt3Ll^
\"i (u)0/ita3)
C-i"i
^'ll, n
E-OS, \^
r-oa
G-oio
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04,0!
"fe-Of
G.-G4
•35-0^,01
E- 04,Oi
-M-,01,0^
P-04
6-00
No.
of Plants
1
1
a
i
i
i
4
n
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
\
\
I
Surface Arec
SI (acres)
0.18
0.18
O.18
-------
Industry
FiCV ILES
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
U/li/OU /
Date -f 1
Warn - X L - \ ^A
Number of Plants
13-
Production
00
Waste Streams
^ SoluGVTS
soliKwK
S Lick(L
^^
i
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
33.0
33.O
4(jfl.^
No.
of Plants
I
1
"3
1
Waste Management
Technology
A ~ 0 ^ k^fllfltL ' )
v^fwfl/fUo)
i*-]
"B-13
a- os
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-0^,0
"B-0^
d-0^
^-00
No.
of Plants
\
I
3
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
\
•Surface Area/
SI (acres)
0..4U,
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
N
Model
-I
5/11/80
Date ~7
/ / _
~/h* jX
Production
\'Q h/i M
Waste Streams
^olvxivvVs
Y\OML
t— '
00
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
4.1
•
No.
of Plants
1,
l "3
Waste Management
Technology
A -13
-B-ob
Appl icable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
"B-OO
No.
of Plants
-0
\-3
Treatment /Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
IRA
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
Date
- iv\cKv-eel
Number of Plants
Production i 1 t JQQ
y
Waste Streams
^ouun
YXGWL
1— •
03
ro
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
Qi.S
^^^^^
No.
of Plants
1
^
Waste Management
Technology
A -.13
"S-Olc
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
IV 04
^-00
No.
of Plants
1
S
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/11/80
Date
i/u-\iv-eL"
Number of Plants
a
Production
OOP Idb/uv
u
Waste Streams
\^0 )Vk-^-
o
i
oo
CO
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
No.
of Plants
a
Waste Management
Technology
A ~~ OG>
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
>A ~ OO
No.
of Plants
«a
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Aree
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
Number of Plants
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
6/li/eu
i/eu / ,
Date 7 /?°, I SO
Production
Waste Streams
Soli^ vl^
V\ 0 Ivt
a
i
00
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
0.4
No.
of Plants
\
4
Waste Management
Technology
Ai Tj
^^ I \.
•5- Ob
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A-04
"3-00
No.
of Plants
\
4
i reatment/Storage
Surface Imooundments
No. per
Plant
i
Surface Aree
SI (acres)
-------
Industry
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
Model
VoiW\
O/ll/OU . ,
Date 7/29_iJ
V( \ I
\f
\\\c\ \vec~V
Number of Plants
ii
Production
VI
Waste Streams
<;o\\M.-H>
\^\vJL
a
i
co
tn
Quantity
(MT/yr-plant)
\A
~
No.
of Plants
\
n
Waste Management
Technology
A -13
B-O(o
Applicable Tech-
nical Requirements
A -04
"B-oo
No.
of Plants
i
n
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
RCRA WASTE MANAGEMENT SUMMARY
"1A
b/11/80
Industry
Number of Plants
Date
\-fi\onc - L~
Production
Waste Streams
uo vvJL
0
^-i
00
o^
Quantity
(MT/yr-p.lant)
No.
of Plants
a
Waste Management
Technology
A-Q(o
Applicable lech-
nical Requirements
A-OO
No.
of Plants
•9L
Treatment/Storage
Surface Impoundments
No. per
Plant
Surface Area/
SI (acres)
-------
|