United States
Environmental Protection
Agency
EPA-600/2-80-031
July 1980
Research and Development
Formation and
Significance of
N-Chloro Compounds
in Water Supplies

-------
                                                      EPA-600/2-80-031
                                                      July 1980
FORMATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF N-CHLORO COMPOUNDS IN WATER SUPPLIES
                                by
                         J.  Carrell Morris
                             Neil Ram
                           Barbara Baum
                           Edmund Wajon
                        Harvard University
                   Division of Applied Sciences
                  Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138
                        Grant No.  R803631
                          Project Officer

                          Edward L. Katz
                 Drinking Water Research Division
            Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory
                      Cincinnati, Ohio  45268
            MUNICIPAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
                OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
               U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                      CINCINNATI, OHIO  45268

-------
                                 DISCLAIMER


      This report has been reviewed by the Municipal Environmental Research
Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, and approved for publication.  Approval does not signify that the
contents necessarily reflect  the views and policies of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                      ii

-------
                                    FOREWORD
     The Environmental Protection Agency was created because of increasing
public and government concern about the dangers of pollution to the health
and welfare of the American people.  The complexity of that environment
and the interplay between its components require a concentrated and inte-
grated attack on the problem.

     Research and development is that necessary first step in problem
solution and it involves defining the problem,  measuring its impact,
and searching for solutions.  The Municipal Environmental Research Labor-
atory develops new and improved technology and  systems for the prevention,
treatment, and management of wastewater and solid and hazardous waste
pollutant discharges from municipal and community sources, for the pre-
servation and treatment of public drinking water supplies, and to minimize
the adverse economic, social,  health, and aesthetic effects of pollution.
This publication is one of the products of that research; a most vital
communications link between the researcher and  the user community.

     This report addresses the hygienic and aesthetic importance of nitro-
genous organic compounds in natural waters and  the formation and properties
of their chlorinated derivatives.  The   areas  studied include:  (1) an
investigation of the reactivity toward aqueous  chlorine of selected nitro-
genous compounds analogous to those anticipated as likely constitutents
of raw drinking water supplies; (2) an attempt  to isolate, concentrate
and identify nitrogenous compounds actually present in such supplies as
an aid to understanding reactions occurring with nitrogen-containing
materials during water chlorination;  (3) an evaluation of several analy-
tical methods now in use for distinguishing between free available
chlorine and combined chlorine; and (4) the determination of nitrogenous
precursors to haloform formation.
                                       Francis T.  Mayo, Director
                                       Municipal Environmental
                                       Research Laboratory
                                     iii

-------
                                   ABSTRACT
         .secure hygienic quality in water supplies is dependent upon the main-
 tenance of a free chlorine residual./ The available analytical methods used to
 differentiate between free and combined chlorine, however, are subject to
 interference from organic chloramines, though it appears some differentiation
 is achieved using the amperometric method of analysis.
       A^arge number of naturally occurring nitrogenous organic compounds   \
 readily react with aqueous chlorine, exerting significant chlorine demands.]
 Several of these compounds also produce chloroform upon reaction with chlorine
 with maximum formation occurring between pH 8.5 and pH 10.5.   The correlation
 between chloroform formation and chlorine demand, however,  is tenuous.   It  also
 appears that intermediates may be formed under neutral or slightly acidic con-
 ditions which produce chloroform upon exposure to more alkaline conditions.
          analytical scheme was developed to identify trace quantities  of  N-
 organic contaminants in dilute aqueous solution. \  This involved:   (1)  selective
 removal of non-nitrogenous compounds using XAJ5-8  and Tenax GC macroreticular
 resins;  (2)  concentration of water samples from  1,000 to 2,000 fold by flash
 evaporation and lyophilization; and  (3) separation and identification by high
 performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).   Seven  N-organic compounds were
 identified in municipal water supplies    (adenine, 5-chlorouracil, cytosine,
 guanine,  purine,  thymine,  and uracil)  at concentrations ranging from 20ug/L
 to  860ug/L.   All  of the samples exhibited  a large  unresolved  group of  compounds
 rapidly eluting from the chroma tographic column.   Exhibition  of a corresponding
 fluorescamine responsive fluorescent peak,  determination of the organic nitrogen
 content of this group of materials,  and retention  positions of  reference  com-
 pounds   suggested that this group was  composed  of primary amine compounds.
 The demonstration of a parallel increase in organic nitrogen  content with
 population density in two  laboratory grown  blue-green algal cultures,  and the
 finding of elevated organic nitrogen values in  a water supply sample collected
 during  the occurrence of a blue-green  algal bloom,  suggested  that summer  algal
 bloom occurrences can add  considerably to  the organic nitrogen  content of a
water supply.

      The  levels  of chloroform which might  be formed at  pH 7  were calculated
by assuming the N-organic  compounds  identified  in  the water supplies were not
removed prior  to  chlorination and yielded CHC13 according  to  the results  of
Baum (10).  The calculated CHC13  levels were well  below  the maximum contaminant
level (MCL) of  0.1  mg/L proposed  by  EPA for total  trihalogenated methanes.  The
calculated CHC13  formed under more alkaline conditions,  however, was  more than
10% of  the MCL  and  was  therefore significant.  The  calculated  levels of  com-
bined forms of  chlorine yielding  falsely positive  tests  for free chlorine in
                                      iv

-------
some samples were slightly less or exceeded the 0.5 mg/L free chlorine
residual generally taken as an acceptable level of disinfection.  If a major
portion of the free chlorine residuals determined in finished drinking water
consists of the less germicidal combined forms, additional chlorine should be
added to assure protection of public health.

      This investigation of the formation and significance of organic N-chloro
compounds in chlorination of water supplies funded under research grant
R803631  involves the identification and determination of nitrogenous organic
materials in natural waters and the elucidation of their behavior with aqueous
chlorine.  The areas studied include:  (1) an investigation of the reactivity
toward aqueous chlorine of selected nitrogenous compounds analogous to those
anticipated as likely constituents of raw drinking water supplies;  (2) an
attempt to isolate, concentrate and identify nitrogenous compounds actually
present in such supplies as an aid to understanding reactions occurring with
nitrogen-containing materials during water chlorination;  (3) an evaluation of
several analytical methods now in  use for distinguishing between free avail-
able chlorine and combined chlorine; and  (4) the determination of nitrogenous
precursors to haloform formation.

     This report was submitted in fulfillment of Grant # R-803631 by Harvard
University under the sponsorship of the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.
This report covers the period April 1,  1975 to June 30, 1979, and work was
completed on June 30,  1979.

-------
                                 CONTENTS
 Foreword	
 Abstract	    v
 Acknowledgment	viii

    1.   Introduc tion	    i
    2.   Summary	    5
    3.   Differentiation Between Free  and  Combined  Chlorine	    7
             Experimental methods	    9
             Chlorinated cyanuric acid	   10
             Nitrogenous organic compounds	   12
             Conclusions	   20
    4.   Identification of Nitrogenous Organics  in  Water  Supplies	   21
             Analytical methods	   21
             Results	   35
    5.   Reactions Between Nitrogenous Organic Compounds  and Aqueous
        Chlorine	  187
             Analytical methods	  187
             Chloroform standards	  189
             Results and discussion	  191
             Conclusions	  232

 References	  235
 Appendices

   A.   Appended Tables from Section  4	  243
   B.   Appended Figures from Section 4	  277
   C.   Literature Review	  287
             The hazards of consuming chemically contaminated
             drinking water	  287
             Organic impurities in natural waters	  289
             Nitrogenous organic compounds	  294
             Algal production of N-organic extracellular metabolites..  306
             Urochromes and humic substances	  306
            Macroreticular resins	  308
             Isolation of trace organic compounds  from dilute aqueous
             solution	  312
            Kjeldahl and ammonia determinations	  332

Appendices References	  335
                                    vii

-------
                                ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
     This work was  supported  by Grant No.  R803631  from the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.

     The investigators studying the research  topic during the period of this
grant included:  Dr. Barbara  Baum, Dr. M.M. Varma, Dr. Joseph Gould, Mr.
Edmund Wajon and Dr. Neil Ram.   Ms. Agnes  Straud also assisted the study.

     The investigators wish to  thank the personnel at the Lawrence Experiment
Station, Lawrence, Massachusetts for the use  of their gas chromatograph and
for their help in the chloroform analyses,  and Mrs. Elaine Zagarella for
gathering reference material.
                                     viii

-------
                                  SECTION 1

                                 INTRODUCTION


      Chlorine  was  first used  in  America  to disinfect a municipal water supply
 in 1908 in Jersey  City, New Jersey  (1).   Since  then it has become  the primary
 defense against  the  transmission and  spread of  waterborne disease.   It has
 been known for the past 60 years or more that free aqueous chlorine  (HOC1 and
 OC1~)  reacts readily with ammonia or  other nitrogenous organics to form com-
 bined  forms of chlorine generically termed chloramines.  In general, these
 compounds  are  much less germicidal than  free aqueous chlorine.  A  secure
 hygienic quality in  water supplies is  therefore, dependent upon the mainte-
 nance  of a free  chlorine residual.  The  combined forms, however, retain an
 oxidizing  capacity and tend to react  similarly  with many analytical reagents
 for  active chlorine.  When these N-chloro compounds are formed, tests for free
 chlorine may be  falsely positive and may indicate a nonexistent germicidal or
 virucidal  behavior.

     The ability of  varying analytical methods  to differentiate between free
 and  combined chlorine is therefore of great importance and was investigated in
 this study.

     It  has not  always been recognized that there are two types of problems
 concerned  in chemical selectivity of  the sort that is required to differenti-
 ate between free and combined chlorine.  The first type, the one commonly
 recognized, is that  the reagent  must not react  directly with the combined form
 of chlorine as it  does with the  residual free chlorine.  But, it must also be
 kept in  mind that  even though the reagent reacts only with free residual
 chlorine,  it may nonetheless give a false positive response when hydrolysis of
 the type  reaction  (1) occurs.

                          RNHC1 + H20 * RNH2 + HOC1  .                     (1)

 -Reaction (1) is  rapid  compared with the time required for the chemical deter-
mination.

     Differentiation of  combined and free residual chlorine is relatively easy
when the only combined forms of active chlorine are the ammonia chloramines,
for then the hydrolysis  equilibria lie sufficiently to the left to make selec-
tivity secure on a thermodynamic basis.  The situation is more complex, how-
ever, when organic chloramines are concerned,  for then hydrolysis may be rapid
enough and great enough  for response as if there were much free residual
chlorine present.  But only the instantaneously present free residual chlorine
is effective virucidally,  not that generated by hydrolysis in response to
chemical reaction.

-------
      A recent investigation of particular significance in this  regard  is  the
 study by Guter,  Cooper and Sorber (2).   Their evaluation of  field methods for
 determining free active chlorine, which included variations  on  most of  the
 standard techniques,  showed that only one,  a technique based on the use of
 syringaldazine,  was free of false positive tests as  compared with ampero-
 metric investigations.  So, most methods for determining free active chlorine
 may give misleading information about the bactericidal or virucidal effective-
 ness associated  with  specified chlorination procedures.

      An even more intriguing aspect of  their work, however,  was the finding
 that the false positives occurred only  with organically polluted water  and
 not for synthetic waters containing ammonia.  The implication is that organic
 N-chloro compounds are formed when polluted waters are chlorinated and  that
 some of these react more readily with supposedly selective reagents for free
 active chlorine  than  do the ammonia-chloramines.

      Even this study  had its ambiguities,  however, for it was necessary to
 assume that the  amperomctric method gives reliable results for  free residual
 chlorine,  an assumption that may not always be correct.   Only purely physical
 methods that can measure the free active chlorine instantaneously present in
 the aqueous solution  without disturbance of the'  labile equilibria can provide
 thoroughly reliable standards against which proposed  chemical determinations
 can be checked.

      The problem has  been solved, in part,  by the recent work of O'Brien  (3),
 in  which all the hydrolysis and ionization  constants  were evaluated for the
 chlorinated isocyanurate system.   As a  result, it is  now possible to compute,
 on  purely  thermodynamic grounds,  the exact  concentration of  free active
 chlorine instantaneously present  in any chlorinated  isocyanurate solution.
 Indeed,  it is possible by adjustment of chlorine to  isocyanurate ratio  and
 pH  to prepare solutions with desired known  concentrations of  free and com-
 bined residual chlorine.   Unfortunately,  conclusions  reached  on the basis of
 this  organic-chloramine system may not  be valid  for  all  organic chloramines.

      There have  been  numerous investigations of  the  reactions of free aqueous
 chlorine with ammonia,  epitomized by the papers  of Palin (4)  and of Wei and
 Morris (5) .   Studies  like these have provided reasonably accurate information
 about the  conditions  of formation and properties  of  the  ammonia-chloramines
 that  their behavior and germicidal effectiveness  relative to  free aqueous
 chlorine can be  considered satisfactorily known.  Moreover,  it  has been the
 custom to  check  the performance of new  analytical methods supposedly specific
 for free chlorine against prepared solutions of  ammonia-chloramines in  the
 assessment  of interferences.

      In  contrast,  knowledge about the organic nitrogenous compounds likely to
be  found in raw  waters  or about the reactions of  these compounds with aqueous
 chlorine and  the properties of the products is almost  nonexistent.  This is
despite  the  fact that  the concentration of  organic amine-type nitrogen  is
 likely  to  be  considerably greater than  that of free ammonia  in  natural
surface waters not  recently contaminated with municipal  sewage.  A review of
older  books  on water  chemistry published  in the  times  when nitrogen analyses
were  still  used  as  prime  indicators of  water quality,  such as Thresh and

-------
Suckling, Examination of Waters and Water Supplies (6), or Mason and Buswell's
Chemistry of Water Supply and Treatment (7), shows that expected concentra-
tions of free ammonia in upland surface waters are less than 0.06 mg/1 N,
whereas total organic amino-N measured by the Kjeldahl methods may be ex-
pected to be several tenths of a milligram per liter.

     In addition to the disinfecting problems caused by the less germicidal
N-chloro compounds discussed previously, nitrogenous organics have been shown
to produce complex stable mutagenic chlorinated products when reacted with
chlorine (8,9).  They have also been suggested as possible precursors in
haloform formation (10).

     Although the composition and extent of hydrocarbon contamination in
natural waters has been under extensive examination, the identification of
nitrogenous organics in water supplies has not been significantly pursued.
This is because many nitrogenous organics are relatively non-volatile and
consequently their identification and analysis by gas chromatography is not
possible without the prior formation of volatile derivatives.  Amino acids
are known to be present in the nitrogenous organic fraction found in natural
waters, and some attempts have been made to determine them (11-13), but the
quantities found—some yg per 1 of N in toto—seem small compared with total
organic-N expected.  One would also expect considerable concentrations of
pyrrolic-N from the breakdown of chlorophyll and similar plant compounds, of
purine derivatives and of pyrimidine-related compounds such as uracil and
other nucleic acid components, but there appears to be little specific in-
formation available.

     Recent advances in the field of high pressure liquid chromatography
(HFCL), have made the detection of non-volatile nitrogenous compounds in-
creasingly feasible.  Amino acids commonly found in protein hydrolysates,
physiological fluids (14) and standard amino acid mixtures (15-25) have been
resolved using HPLC with fluorescence detection at the picomole level.  Dr.
R. Jolley and Dr. W. Pitt have made significant progress in the separation
and identification of trace organic compounds in urine (26), primary and
secondary stages of municipal sewage treatment plants, and natural waters
(27-29) using a strongly basic anion exchange resin (Bio-Rad aminex A-27)
with ammonium acetate acid buffer eluent.  Jolley (30,31) also found that a
number of chlorinated pyrimidines and purines were formed during the chlori-
nation of sewage effluent.  Among these were 5-chlorouracil, 5-chlorouridine,
8-chlorocaffeine, 6-chloroguanine and 8-chloroxanthine.

     There have been some studies on the reactions of amino acids with
aqueous chlorine, but very little on reactions of other probable aqueous
nitrogenous compounds.  The survey by Tarras (32), although widely quoted,
provides little positive information.  Palin (4) extended his work with
ammonia to include some observations of breakpoint phenomena.  Culver (33),
made a detailed study of reactions in the chlorination of glycine, finding,
among other things, that cyanogen chloride could be formed as an intermediate
product.  Friend (34), showed that many amino-acids gave N-chloro derivatives
rapidly, more rapidly than NHa at neutral pH.  Conditions of formation and
properties of many other N-chloro compounds are known, of course, but not of
those that are likely to be of interest in connection with water chlorination.

-------
     One category of  reactions between chlorine and aqueous nitrogenous
compounds of particular  concern  is  that which produces haloforms.  The dis-
coveries by Rook (35) and by  Bellar et a.1.  (36) that the chlorination of
water supplies containing organic matter produces chloroform and other tri-
halome thanes, have evoked concern because of the potential carcinogenic and
toxic properties of these compounds.  Morris (37) calculated the intake of a
50 kg individual consuming  one liter per day of water containing 0.1 mg/1 of
chloroform to be .002 mg/kg,  about  one two-hundredth of the minimum observed
chronic toxicity level.  It was  suggested (38) that compounds which ionize
rapidly to give carbanions  account  for the  formation of chloroform within the
contact time of most  water  treatment plants and distribution systems.  One
structure in which active carbanion formation occurs is the nitrogen con-
taining pyrrole ring.  The  hydrogens ortho  to the nitrogen are activated like
those in phenol and provide sites for chlorination and subsequent haloform
formation.  The pyrrole  ring  is  naturally important because of its occurrence
in chlorophylls, xanthophylls and heme.  Indole and derivatives like trypto-
phan also contain pyrrolic  units.   An investigation into the haloform
producing potential of selected  nitrogenous organics was therefore pursued in
this study.

     This report addresses  the hygienic and aesthetic importance of nitro-
genous organic compounds in natural waters  and the formation and properties
of their chlorinated  derivatives.   Such information is important hygienically
because assured disinfection  of  all forms of pathogens can be maintained
reliably only if specific determinations for free aqueous chlorine are not
subject to interference  by  organic  N-chloro compounds that may be formed.  It
is also important aesthetically  because it  appears that some of the noxious
tastes and odors commonly attributed to aqueous chlorine may actually be due
either to organic N-chloro  compounds or to  NCI 3 formed from such compounds
under conditions where it is  not normally formed from
     This investigation of  the  formation and significance of organic N-chloro
compounds in chlorination of  water  supplies funded under research grant
R8036301 involves the  identification and determination of nitrogenous organic
materials in natural waters and the elucidation of their behavior with
aqueous chlorine.  The areas  studied include:   (1) an investigation of the
reactivity toward aqueous chlorine  of selected nitrogenous compounds analo-
gous to those anticipated as  likely constituents of raw drinking water
supplies;   (2) an attempt  to isolate,  concentrate, and identify nitrogenous
compounds actually present  in such  supplies as an aid to understanding
reactions occurring with nitrogen-containing materials during water chlori-
nation;   (3) an evaluation of  several  analytical methods now in use for
distinguishing between free available chlorine and combined chlorine;  and
(4) the determination  of nitrogenous precursors to haloform formation.

     A detailed literature  review on the occurrence and environmental
significance of nitrogenous organic contaminants in water, and analytical
methods for their determination is  included in Appendix C.

-------
                                  SECTION 2

                                   SUMMARY
     1.  All of the methods used to measure free chlorine (DPD, orthotolidine-
arsenite (OTA), LCV, SNORT, SYRING, and amperometric titration) are subject
to interference from organic chloramines.

     2.  The amperometric method displays some differentiation between free
and total chlorine.

     3.  If only amino acids are present along with ammonia, the DPD or
SYRING methods should be used since these appear to be the most specific for
free chlorine under these conditions.

     4.  XAD and Tenax resins selectively remove non-nitrogenous organic
contaminants from water although not with 100% efficiency.

     5.  A large number of naturally occurring nitrogenous organic compounds
readily react with aqueous chlorine, exerting significant chlorine demands.

     6.  Several nitrogenous organic compounds produce chloroform upon
reaction with chlorine.

     7.  Chlorine demand does not appear to be a very good indication of the
chloroform producing potential of an individual compound.

     8.  For chloroform products, increasing  the pH has a considerable in-
fluence on the quantity of chloroform formed.  Maximum chloroform formation
occurs between pH 8.5 and pH 10.5.

     9.  Compounds that show significant chloroform production only under
alkaline conditions may form other chlorinated derivatives under neutral or
slightly acidic conditions.  These intermediates produce chloroform upon
exposure to more alkaline conditions.

    10.  Chlorination may have the beneficial effect on chemical water
quality in reacting to eliminate amines which are natural precursors of car-
cinogenic nitrosamines formed by reaction with salivary or gastric nitrite.

    11.  Chromatograms of resin-filtered samples showed no improvement in
either U.V. or fluorescence background traces over chromatograms of unfil-
tered samples.  The total number of compounds identified at a given collec-
tion site was maximized, however, by analyzing both raw and resin-filtered
samples.  This  relates  to  item  //4.

-------
      12.   The  average values for compounds identified  in  the water supply
 samples were 367,  60, 20,  167,  200,  110,  and  160  yg/L, for adenine, 5-chloro-
 uracil, cytosine,  guanine,  purine,  thymine and  uracil, respectively.  Uracil,
 adenine,  and guanine  were  found most frequently in  the water supply samples
 while 5-chlorouracil, cytosine  and  purine were  only encountered once in these
 sources.

      13.   Summer algal blooms may contribute  significantly to the organic
 nitrogen  content of water  supplies.

      14.   The  levels  of chloroform which  might  be formed  at pH 7 were calcu-
 lated  by  assuming  N-organic compounds  identified  In the water supplies were
 not removed prior  to  chlorination and  yielded CHCla according to the results
 of Baum (10).  The calculated CHC13  levels were well below the maximum con-
 taminant  level (MCL)  of 0.1 mg/L proposed by  EPA  for total trihalogenated
methanes.  The calculated  levels of  CHC13 formed  under more alkaline condi-
 tions, however, were  more  than  10% of  the MCL and were therefore significant.

      15.   The calculated levels  of combined forms of chlorine yielding
 falsely positive tests  for  free  aqueous chlorine  in some  samples were
slightly  less or exceeded  the 0.5 mg/L free chlorine residual generally taken
as an acceptable level  of disinfection."  If a major portion of the free
chlorine  residuals determined in finished drinking water  consists of the less
germicidal combined forms,  additional  chlorine  should be  added to assure
protection of public  health.

-------
                                  SECTION 3

              DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN FREE AND COMBINED CHLORINE


     As  discussed previously combined available chlorine is a much less active
disinfectant  than free chlorine.  Analytical methods capable of differenti-
ating between free available chlorine and the various forms of combined chlo-
rine and the  various forms of combined chlorine are, therefore, needed to
ensure that water supplies are adequately disinfected.  However, interconver-
sion of  these species occurs in solution through the hydrolysis of combined
chlorine to free chlorine (equation (2)), thus presenting difficulties in
developing suitable analytical methods.

                          R2NC1 + H20 -*• R2NH + HOC1                        (2)


     The methods currently most used for differentiating free chlorine from
the combined  forms are DPD (39-43), orthotolidine-arsenite (OTA) (40,44,45),
LCV (39,46,47), SNORT (39,48), SYRING (39,48,51), and amperometric titration
(39,40,52-58).  These methods rely upon the more rapid rate of reaction
between  the given reagent with HOC1 as compared to the N-chloro compound
(kinetic selectivity), and on the slowness of hydrolysis of the N-chloro
compound.

     The errors involved in the kinetic selectivity of the analytical reagents
are illustrated by their reaction with NH2C1 and NHC12.  DPD and SNORT, for
example, react with these chloramines at a rate of 3.6% and 1.1% per minute,
respectively.  The reaction with SYRING is slower, however, with interference
only being observed at higher NH2C1 concentrations (48,49).  The selective
differentiating ability of the analytical reagents decreases (40,59,60) at
lower pH values.  This may be partially attributable to the acid catalysis of
the hydrolysis reaction (equation (2)) (61,62) as illustrated by the inability
of the acid orthotolidine method to distinguish between free and combined
chlorine without rapid addition of arsenite.

     Several of the analytical reagents have been tested for their response to
N-chloro compounds.  Palin (4) found that DPD could distinguish between free
chlorine and several types of chlorinated amino acids.  The OTA procedure was
found to distinguish between free and combined oxidant when seawater con-
taining  several amino acids,  diphenylamine and uracil was chlorinated (65).

     In  studying the SYRING procedure, it was found that although it worked
well in  simple solutions of known composition, there were several reports of
false positive chlorine in natural waters (49,50).  It was also found that N,
NJ-2,  2!-4, 4^6, e^octachloro-N, N^diphenylurea reacted with SYRING (66).

-------
     Recently,  a membrane electrode has been developed by Johnson  (67,68)
which  shows  promise as a discriminatory method.   Selectivity is based on
species volatility and the application of an appropriate positive  potential
to the electrode.

     The  experimental work on  this topic examined the selective differenti-
ating ability of the six analytical reagents for  free aqueous chlorine in  the
presence  of  a variety of N-chloro compounds.  Several types of nitrogenous
organic compounds were investigated and are shown in Table 1.
               TABLE 1.  NITROGENOUS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS STUDIED
       AM I NO ACIDS
                                  KETEROCYCLIC BASES
GLYCYLGLYCINE   (GLY) NHjCHjCNHCHjCootf  SUCCINIMIDE
                                                       (Su)
       SARCOSINE
              ($A)
CREATINUIE
       GLUT AM ic ACID   (GLuHiooccK,cHjCnccioH   INDOLE
                                NK
       PHENYLALANINE   (PA)

       TYROSiNE

       PROLINE         (PR)

       GREATINE

       HISTIDINE

       M-AM1NOPHENOL   (AP)
TRYPTOPHAH
PYRROLE
URACIL
CYTOSINE
THYMINE
BARBITURIC ACID
ADEN INE
GUANINE
PURINE
URIC ACID
CAFFEINE
4-AM1NO-
ANTIPYRINE
(TRY) rl
H

-------
EXPERIMENTAL METHODS

Chlorine-Demand Free Water (CDFW)

     All solutions used In this study were prepared using chlorine-demand
free water, prepared by dosing distilled water with 1-2 mg/1 chlorine and and
destroying the chlorine remaining after 6-8 hours by UV radiation.  All glass-
ware was dosed with 1-2 mg/1 chlorine for several hours and rinsed with CDFW.

Chlorine Solutions

     Concentrated chlorine solution was prepared by bubbling chlorine gas
into distilled water, adjusting the pH to 10 with KOH and then distilling
this solution at 90°C under suction.  This produced a 10~2 M solution of
chloride-free HOC1.  A  1x io~3 M stock solution of HOC1 was prepared by
dilution and stored in a low actinic glass bottle at 5°C.  Total available
chlorine in this solution was determined periodically using the thiosulphate-
iodide titration method.

Buffer Solutions

     A 10"3 M sodium bicarbonate buffer solution in CDFW was used in which
the pH was adjusted to pH 7.0 using COa so that the chloride concentration
could be kept as low as possible.

10 3 M Stock Soj-utions of Nitrogenous Compounds

     The samples of compounds investigated were of the highest quality
commercially available, and were not purified further before use.  The com-
pounds were dissolved in 10"3 M pH 7.0 bicarbonate buffer.

Analytical Methods

     The methods employed were DPD, ORTHO (and later OTA), LCV, SNORT, SYRING
and amperometric titration.  The reagents were prepared according to Standard
Methods (39).  Color development was measured on a Beckmann DU Spectrophoto-
meter.  A Fisher Model 393 Chlorine Titrimeter was used for amperometric
titrations.  Reagents were discarded if they became discolored or were found
to have lost sensitivity to the stock chlorine solution.  The limit of
detection of the colorimetric methods varied between batches of reagents from
about 0.02 mg/1 to 0.15 mg/1; the limit of detection for the amperometric
method was about 0.05 mg/1.

Analytical Procedures

     10 ml of a 10~3 molar concentration of each compound tested was dosed
with sufficient  1x 10"3 M stock chlorine solution to give an initial molar
chlorine to compound ratio of 1:1, 2:1 or 3:1.  Reaction was allowed to pro-
ceed for half an hour in the dark, at which time the mixture was diluted to
1000 ml with 10"3 M pH 7 buffer and transferred to an amber bottle where it
was mixed thoroughly for another 15 minutes.  A portion of the solution was
then added to the analytical reagent and analysed as rapidly as possible.

-------
Analysis using DPD, ORTHO,  LCV, SNORT, SYRING and amperometric titration was
carried out, in that order,  a process which generally took 1 to 1-1/2 hours.
Very little change in  residual chlorine was found to occur during this time.
In the later experiments with cyanuric acid, the reaction procedure was
altered so that the reactions could be carried out at 10~5 M concentrations
instead of 10~3 M concentrations.  500 ml solutions containing the appropriate
amount of the compound and  chlorine were mixed in less than 30 seconds from
individual separatory  funnels leading directly into an amber bottle, where
the solution was thoroughly mixed  for 45 minutes before analysis.


CHLORINATED CYANURIC ACID

     Considerable emphasis  in the  investigation of the analytical methods was
focused on the cyanuric acid/aqueous chlorine system because of the ability
to predict the equilibrium  composition of the solution from the equilibrium
constants measured by  O'Brien et al. (69), or by Pinsky and Hu (70).  At
equilibrium in aqueous solution, mono, di and trichloro derivatives coexist
along with substantial quantities  of free chlorine (F).

     Aqueous chlorine  was mixed with cyanuric acid and solutions of the
chlorinated cyanuric acids  were also prepared.  The results of the analysis
of free (F) and total  (T) chlorine under different conditions at each stated
chlorine:  cyanuric acid molar ratio are presented in Tables 2 to 4.  This is
compared with the theoretical concentrations of free chlorine (F), the mono-
chlorinated species (M) , the dichlorinated species (D) and total chlorine (T)
at pH 7.0, derived from O'Brien (3).

     There is considerable  scatter in the concentration measured by each
analytical method with a standard  deviation of about 10-15%.  There is also
some variation between the  categories.  This may be due to  (i) differences
in mixing and thus demand,  or  (ii) low reproducibility in the analytical
method.

     The results indicate that, with the exception of the amperometric
method:

      (i)  none of the methods for free chlorine can distinguish between free
           and combined chlorine;

     (ii)  all methods measure the total available chlorine.

     The amperometric  method displayed some differentiation between free and
total     chlorine, indicating that with at least some of the combined
species, hydrolysis is slow.  The  interference observed in the other methods
for free chlorine is,  therefore, caused by the reaction of the analytical
reagent with the N-chloro compound.  In the amperometric method, this
reaction appears to be slow, while in the colorimetric methods it is rapid.
                                     10

-------
                   TABLE 2.   CHLORINATED CYANURIC ACID

                 MOLAR RATIO 1:1  0.71 MG/L CL2  pH 7.0
                   RESIDUAL AVAILABLE CHLORINE (MG/L)a
Reaction
Condition
10~3M
Reaction
10~5M
Reaction
Average

Theory

Species
Measured
F
T
F
T
F
T
F
M
D
T
METHOD
DPD
0.55
0.50
0.40
0.50
0.50
0.50



ORTHO
0.55
0.60
0.40
0.40
0.45
0.50



LCV
0.45
0.55
0.60
0.45
0.55
0.50
0.33
0.31
0.07
0.71
SNORT
0.50
0.55
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.50



SYRING AMP
0.55 0.40
0.50
0.45 0.40
0.50
0.50 0.40
0.50



Averages in MG/L CLa, rounded to nearest 0.05 MG/L.
                   TABLE 3.  CHLORINATED CYANURIC ACID

                 MOLAR RATIO 2:1  1.42 MG/L CL2  pH 7.0
                   RESIDUAL AVAILABLE CHLORINE (MG/L)a
Reaction
Condition
10~3M
Reaction
10~5M
Reaction
Dichloro-
Cyanurate
Average


Theory

Species
Measured
F
T
F
T
F
T
F
T
F
M
D
T
METHOD
DPD
1.20
1.10
1.00
1.05
0.80
0.90
1.00
1.00




• ORTHO
1.25
1.30
1.00
1.00
0.70

1.00
1.10




LCV
1.45
1.20
1.10
1.15
1.00
0.90
1.25
1.10
0.79
0.41
0.22
1.42
SNORT
1.45
1.25
1.05
1.10
0.75
0.80
1.10
1.05




SYRING AMP
1.30 0.40
0.95
1.00 0.90
1.05
0.80 0.80
0.95
1.00 0.75
0.95
"



Averages in MG/L CLa, rounded to nearest 0.05 MG/L.
                                    11

-------
                     TABLE 4.   CHLORINATED CYANURIC ACID

                   MOLAR RATIO 3:1  2.13 MG/L CL2  pH  7.0
                     RESIDUAL  AVAILABLE CHLORINE  (MG/L)a
Reaction
Condition
10~3M
Reaction
10~5M
Reaction
Trichloro-
Cyanurate
Average

Theory

Species
Measured
F
T
F
T
F
T
F
T
F
M
D
T
METHOD
DPD
1.85
1.65
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.70
1.65
1.65



ORTHO
1.95
2.10
1.60
1.55
1.70

1.75
1.80



LCV
2.10
2.05
1.90
1.80
2.15
2.05
2.05
2.00
1.34
0.41
0.38
2.13
SNORT
2.05
1.90
1.75
1.80
1.90
1.90
1.95
1.85



SYRING AMP ELEC
2.15 1.10
1.55
1.75 1.40
1.70
1.75 1.60
1.80
1.85 1.50
1.75



 Averages  in MG/L  CLa,  rounded  to  nearest 0.05 MG/L.



NITROGENOUS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS

Amino Acids

     The results of free  chlorine  measurement in the presence of amino acids
with a 1:1 ratio of aqueous  chlorine are presented in Fig. 1.  Several
patterns are evident  in this graph.  Zero free chlorine is reported by SYRING
in the presence of 6  amino acids (glycylglycine, glutamic acid, sarcosine,
phenylalanine, tyrosine and  histidine), in contrast to ORTHO, LCV and SNORT.
Similarly, DPD reports  zero  free chlorine in solutions containing 5 of these
amino acids (i.e., with the  exception  of sarcosine).  Because DPD, LCV and
SNORT report a high total chlorine concentration (see Fig. 2) in these
solutions, it seems likely that DPD and SYRING can differentiate effectively
between free and combined chlorine in  these systems.

     At the 2:1 ratio,  DPD again appears to be differentiating effectively.
However, the trend observed  in  free chlorine measurements at the 1:1 ratio
with the SYRING and SNORT methods  are  reversed (see Fig. 3).  The SYRING
method seems to also  be measuring  combined chlorine especially in those
solutions containing  glycylglycine, sarcosine and tyrosine.
                                     12

-------
                       1:1  CI2:AMltfO   /VC-J PS

                          FREE   CHLORINE
                           GLY
                 _._,_*_.  GLl/
                 L_,	  SA
AP  0_0_,,_«,
                                          H
     0-4-

     0-3 .


     0-2

     0-1 .


     o-o.
Figure 1.   1:1 Chlorine:amino acids.  Free chlorine measured  in
            solution initially containing 0.7 mg/1  Cl«.
                                13

-------
                        i;l  CI2:AM!WO  ACIDS
                           TOTAL    CHLORINE

                        - OL Y
                    	  SA
                          T Y
                  OOODDDa
                                       AP

                                       PP
                                       CR

                                       H
      CM
      O
08-


0-7


0-6


05


0-4


0-3


02
               D P D
                  LCV       SNORT     ORTHO
Figure 2.    1:1 Chlorine:amino acids.  Total chlorine measured  in
            solution initially containing 0.7 mg/1 Cl-

-------
                       ; I   C|2 r A M INO  AGIOS

                         FREE    CHLORINE
                      cur
     0-7 i
     0-6-
      0-5-J
   c\j
   o
   en
   E
      0-1
      03
      02
      0-1
      0-0
          DPD
LC V
SNORT      ORTH
Figure 3.    2:1 Chlorine:amino acids.  Free chlorine measured in
            solution initially containing 1.4 mg/1 C12.
                               15

-------
     This study confirmed Palin's  finding  (4)  that DPD was able to differen-
tiate between free chlorine  and  chlorinated amino acids, although we also
found several amino acids  (creatine  and  sarcosine) where such discrimination
was not found.  Some doubts  exist  about  the capabilities of SYRING and SNORT.
It seems SYRING may be able  to distinguish between free chlorine and chlor-
inated amino acids (i.e., with the exception of  creatine and sarcosine),
while SNORT does not.  Moreover, SNORT seemd to  suffer from a bleaching of
the blue color, formed by free chlorine, when  total chlorine was measured
(see Fig. 4).
                             2:1  C12:AMINO ACIDS
                               TOTAL  CHLORINE
                             6 LY
                                                  • ^ f^ ••«
                  *_,	i   OLD
                  	    SA
                   oooaoo    TY
                           0_ Q _ O _Q
        1-2-
     00
     o
     x 08
     ov
        0-6
        02
        0-0
                       p R  >.

                       CR
                       LJ   M.. m_-
                DPD
LGV
     Figure 4.    2:1  Chlorine:amino  acids.   Total  chlorine measured  in
                  solution  initially  containing  1.4 mg/1  Cl™.
                                     16

-------
      ORTHO and  LCV measure  some  combined chlorine  in  the  free chlorine deter-
 mination.   It is  therefore  surprising  that Duursma and Parsi (65) were able
 to differentiate  between  free and  combined oxidant formed from glycine,
 alanine, cysteine, leucine  and tyrosine using OTA.  However, this may in-
 dicate  the behavior of N-bromo compounds towards the  analytical reagents is
 different  from  the N-chloro compounds.

      Differentiation between free  chlorine and chlorinated amino acids thus
 seems to be a result of the kinetics of hydrolysis.   Methods employing a
 neutral pH can  differentiate, but  decreasing the pH even  to pH 4 increases
 the rate of hydrolysis sufficiently to cause artificially high determinations
 of free chlorine.

 Heterocyclic Bases

      For several  of the heterocyclic compounds, chlorine  demand was so high
 that  no available chlorine  remained in solutions mixed with equal molar
 ratios  of  aqueous chlorine.  There is not as striking a pattern in the
 measurement of  free chlorine in  the presence of these compounds as with the
 amino acids (see  Fig. 6).   SNORT does tend to report  higher concentrations of
 free  chlorine than the other methods and in most cases, the total and free
 concentrations  reported by  SNORT are the same (see  Figs.  5 and 6) suggesting
 it  does not differentiate between  free and combined chlorine.  All the ana-
 lytical methods are subject  to some false positive  readings for free chlorine.

      Since  at least one method measured a zero free chlorine concentration in
 each  solution examined, with the exception of those containing purine or
 succinimide, hydrolysis of  these N-chloro compounds must  be slow and inter-
 ference is  due  to direct reaction  with the analytical reagent.

 Selected Amino Acids and Bases

 Glycylglycine—
      DPD can differentiate between free chlorine and  the  mono- and di-chloro
 derivatives, the combined chlorine being measured in  the  monochloramine
 fraction in both solutions.  SYRING can also differentiate between free
 chlorine and the monochloro  derivative.

 Sarcosine—
      Since  only a mono-chloro derivative is possible, the  results shown in
 Figs. 4 and 5 for the 2:1 ratio indicate this derivative  is relatively stable
 in  the presence of excess chlorine.  Complete differentiation between this
 species and free chlorine is only achieved by SYRING.

Creatine—
     Lomas  (71)  carried out  some chlorination studies on  this compound and
found that, using an orthotolidine-ferrous titration procedure (similar to
the SNORT procedure at  pH 7), he could differentiate between free and com-
bined chlorine.   Our results using SNORT show there is some interference of
combined chlorine with  the free chlorine measurement.
                                     17

-------
                 4_,_,_
                 . ----- .   c
                 ^ ____________  u
                           T

                            B

                            P

                            CA
  o
      O-5-i
      0-4
  r   0-3
  O>
  E
      0'2-i
      0-1
      0-0
DPD
                         LCV
Figure 5.    1:1 Chlorine:heterocyclic bases.  Free chlorine measured
            in solution originally containing 0.7 mg/1.
                                18

-------
                    : i   CJg: HEJE^OCXCUC  BASES
                        TOTAL



0-8-
07
049
•O
w O • o
o
- 0-4
0*
e
0-3
o-z
• 1
n-n
•jv 0

T CA 	
/ 'x«
N*
"'-
\ /
""«.•».! t_ • • , I , \
/ / V '\
/ \ x
^'^ y •'"' .-••"' "v\"
*•«. ^X ,/ X X
*"."'" / / XNX
.„.-•"' ">x--..^ ^-"V\
           DPI>
LCV       SHORT
Figure 6.    1:1  Chlorine:heterocyclic bases.  Total chlorine
            measured  in solution originally containing 0.7 mg/1 Cl,
                               19

-------
Succinimide—
     About 4% of the total available chlorine can exist as free chlorine at
equilibrium with N-chloro succinimide.  All methods suffer from some inter-
ference of N-chloro succinimide.  However, ORTHO measures a lower free and
total chlorine concentration than the other methods, suggesting the hydro-
lysis of N-chlorosuccinimide and its reaction with orthotolidine are both
slow at pH 1.3.

Creatinine—
     SNORT is the only method which is capable of differentiating between
free chlorine and the chlorinated creatinines, either the mono- or the di-
chloro derivative.  In the methods were distinction between monochloramine
and dichloramine can be made (DPD and SNORT), concentrations of combined
chlorine were reported in both fractions.  This may be evidence that either
derivative reacts readily in the total method, but may slowly interfere in
the monochloramine fraction, and even with the measurement of free chlorine.
Lomas (71) obtained similar results, both with his "SNORT" procedure and the
DPD method.  However, he interpreted his results as being evidence for the
formation of a mono-chloro derivative only.

Cytosine—
     The SNORT method measured combined chlorine species in the dichloramine
and monochloramine fractions at high cytosine concentrations using chlorine
to cytosine molar ratios of 1 and 2, respectively.  This can be explained by
the greater reactivity of the dichlorocytosine.  At lower cytosine concen-
trations, however, no differentiation was observed.  DPD does differentiate
between free and monochlorocytosine, the later being observed as dichloramine.
Some dichlorocytosine does interfere in the measurement of free chlorine in
the DPD method while the remainder is observed as monochloramine.  LCV, how-
ever experiences no interference from either of these compounds in the
measurement of free chlorine.
CONCLUSIONS

     All of the methods  currently used  to measure free chlorine are subject
to interference from organic  chloramines.  Reliable measurements of the free
chlorine present in water  supplies or wastewaters containing organic nitrogen
can thus not be made unless the  types of organic nitrogen compounds present
are known.  If only amino  acids  are  present along with ammonia, the DPD or
SYRING methods should be used since  these seem to be the most specific for
free chlorine under these  conditions.
                                      20

-------
                                  SECTION 4

           IDENTIFICATION OF NITROGENOUS ORGANICS IN WATER SUPPLIES


     Until recently the organic content of water was generally evaluated using
gross organic analytical determinations such as Total Organic Carbon  (TOC),
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), various extracting methods (CAE and CCE) or
Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD).  Quantitative determination of individual
molecular  species present in the microgram per liter range represented a
formidable analytical task.  The need to understand the specific nature of
the array  of contaminants present in our water supplies, however, has lead to
significant progress in the development of methods and instrumentation re-
quired for the identification and quantification of such contaminants.
Resins, capable of removing specific categories of trace organics, and the
development of high pressure liquid chromatographic techniques have made
possible the detection of non-volatile nitrogenous organic compounds from
dilute sources.

     Quantitative determination of organic constituents involves concentration,
separation, and identification techniques.  Because of the broad types of
organic compounds likely to be present in natural waters the analytical pro-
cedure must also include a pretreatment step in which "interfering" non-
nitrogenous organic compounds are selectively removed.  The remaining organics,
present at only microgram per liter concentrations must then be concentrated
by factors of a thousand fold prior to chromatographic separation.

     The procedure used in this study to identify trace nitrogenous organics
involved:  (1) the selective removal of interfering, non-nitrogenous organic
material using macroreticular resins [(XAD-2,4 and 8) (72), (Tenax) (73),
(XE-340, 347, 348) (74)], concentration of water samples by flash evaporative
technique  followed by freeze drying, and separation and identification of
specific compounds using high pressure liquid chromatography.


ANALYTICAL METHODS

Sample Sites and Collection

     Field samples were collected from several water supplies of northeastern
Massachusetts as well as one from Bethesda, Ohio.  The Massachusetts locations
were chosen because hydrologic records indicated that summer blue-green algal
blooms were likely to occur in these sources and because of their proximity
to the research laboratory of this investigator.  The municipal water supplies
selected for the study were:  Billerica, MA (Concord River), Lawrence, MA


                                     21

-------
 (Merrimack River),  and Danvers,  MA (Merrimack River),  and Danvers, MA
 (Middleton Pond).   Other Massachusetts water supplies  were considered but the
 absence of observed algal blooms in the hydrologic  records of  these sources
 precluded  their inclusion in this study.   It was  supposed that sampling
 during  a blue-green algal bloom  would increase the  likelihood  of detecting
 individual N-organic compounds,  because organic nitrogen compounds are known
 to be released  as extracellular  metabolites  by this group of algae.  Arrange-
 ments were also made for the sampling and  shipment  of  water samples from
 Fairfax County, VA  during bloom  occurrences.  Plant superintendents at all
 locations  cooperated by reporting the occurrence  of any increased algae
 growth  in  the water supplies under investigation.   Water samples were
 collected  immediately after notification of  a bloom occurrence and prior to
 addition of algicides to the water supply.   Samples were also  taken from the
 Marlboro East and West sewage treatment plants to confirm the  ability to the
 analytical procedure to separate and identify organic  components from pre-
 sumably more concentrated sources.   Samples  from  Spy Pond, Arlington, MA, and
 the Charles River,  Cambridge, MA,  were also  collected.

     Non-bloom  water samples were collected  by grab sampling from approxi-
 mately  the upper six inches of the river or  pond  using a plastic bucket.  The
 samples were then transferred into several acid-washed (10% HC1) one-gallon
 polyethylene jugs for transport  to the laboratory.   The Danvers  'bloom1
 sample  was collected by skimming the upper inch of  water from  regions of
 dense algal growth.   The sample  was collected prior to treatment of the pond
 with copper sulfate.   Water samples taken during  the second sampling of the
 Concord River (Billerica,  7/14/78)  were obtained  by selectively collecting
 water from shallow  regions containing algal  mats  or dense aquatic weeds.  All
 river sites with the exception of the second Billerica sampling were located
 at the  intake channels of the water treatment facilities.  Pond samples were
 taken at convenient  spots along  the shore.   Samples collected  during the
 second  sampling of  the Concord River were taken just downstream of the water
 treatment  plant near Bridge Street  and River Street (Figures 7 through 10).

     Approximately  15 liters of  water were collected at each site.  Samples
were returned to the laboratory  within one hour of  sampling where they were
 either  analyzed immediately for  ammonia and  Kjeldahl nitrogen, or stored at
 5 degrees  centigrade for subsequent analysis.   Filtration and  concentrations
were carried out within one to five days of  the sample collection.  Ammonia
and Kjeldahl-nitrogen contents were determined no more than 24 hours after
collection of the sample.

     In addition to  the field sites,  samples were also taken from laboratory
grown cultures  of two blue green algae, Anabaena flos  aquae and Osci,llatoria
tenuis  (obtained from the  Texas  culture collection  of  algae, Dr. Richard
Starr,  University of  Texas,  Austin,  TX).  These two species were chosen
because  they are known to  liberate  large quantities of nitrogenous organic
compounds  during growth (75,76,77).

     The Anabaena flos aquae culture was incubated  for 42 days while the
Oscillatoria tenuis  culture was  grown for 35 days.   The cultures were
sacrificed,  filtered  to 0.7  mu with Whatman  GF/F  filter paper  and concentrated
by rotary  evaporation followed by  lyophilization.   Concentrated samples were

                                     22

-------
                                          MASSACHUSETTS

                                               BAY
               Chorlcs
     WATERTOWN  Driver site
Figure 7.  Massachusetts sampling sites.

-------
LAWRENCE

        .TRAIN
        PLANT
      Figure 8.  Sampling  site:  Lawrence, MA.
                         24

-------
                           FILTRATION
                              PLANT
Figure 9.  Sampling site:  Danvers, MA.
                 25

-------
                                  NORTH
                                  BILLERICA
                       FILTRATION
                         PLANT   v
                 Figure 10.  Sampling sites:   Billerica, MA.
redissolved in chromatographic eluant,  centrifuged,  and  frozen at -25°C for
several weeks until chromatographic analysis was performed.

Filtration of Collected Samples

     In the laboratory, the water samples were first filtered through Whatman
#1 filter paper to remove suspended material greater than  10 ym in diameter.
The filter paper was replaced whenever the filtration rate decreased appre-
ciably because of clogging.  Whatman filter-papers GF/D  (2.7 ym) and GF/F
(0.7 ym) were also used for the second Danvers sample and  with the filtration
of the laboratory-grown algae cultures to remove suspended algal cells.  Katz
et at. (78) reported that only negligible U.V. absorbing material was lost by
filtration through a 10 ym frit to remove suspended material.
                                     26

-------
Ammonia-N Determination

     Aramonia-N was initially determined using the indophenol colorimetric
reaction described by Dora Scheiner (79).   A twenty-five milliliter filtered
sample was allowed to react in a 50-ml flask with 10 ml of pH 12 buffer
solution containing phenol and nitroprusside followed by dilution to 50-ml
with hypochlorite reagent.

     The buffer solution (pH 12) consisted of 30 g trisodium phosphate
(NasPOif -12H20), and 3g disodium ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) diluted to
one liter with distilled ammonia-free water.  The ammonia-free water was pre-
pared by dosing distilled water with 1-2 mg/L chlorine and decomposing the
active chlorine remaining after 6-8 hours with U.V. radiation.  The phenol
nitroprusside solution was made by dissolving 30g of phenol in a part of the
pH 12 buffer solution followed by addition of 0.1 g sodium nitroprusside
(Na2Fe(CN)5NO-2H20)  and dilution to 500 ml with buffer solution.  It was
important to add the nitroprusside only after the phenol had been dissolved
in the buffer solution to ensure a low reagent blank.

     The alkaline hypochlorite reagent consisted of 15 ml of commercial
bleach (Chlorox, 3.5% available chlorine) and 200 ml of sodium hydroxide
solution diluted to 500 ml with distilled ammonia free water.  Sodium
hydroxide solution was made by dissolving 40g NaOH in distilled ammonia free
water and diluting to one liter.  Reagent grade sodium hypochlorite solution
(Fisher Scientific Co., 4-6% NaOCl) was later used in place of the Chlorox
to obtain lower reagent-blank values.

     The sodium nitroprusside solution was prepared freshly every three weeks
and stored at 4 degrees centigrade.  Alkaline hypochlorite reagent was pre-
pared daily when needed.  All reagents were brought to room temperature prior
to use.

     After addition of the reagents to the water sample the flask was mixed
well by inversion.  Color development was considered complete after 45 minutes
at room temperature.  Absorbance was read at 635 nm against a reagent blank
carried through the procedure along with each set of samples.  A one cm cell
was used to measure the absorbance of solutions having ammonia concentrations
less than about 1 mg/L
     All glassware was acid washed in 10% HC1 prior to use to remove trace
ammoniacal impurities.  A calibration curve was prepared by submitting samples
containing known ammonia concentrations to the standard procedure.  Stock
ammonia solution (1,000 mg/L N; stable at least 6 months) was prepared by
dissolving 3.810 g NHi»Cl, previously dried one hour at 100°C, in distilled
ammonia-free water and diluting to one liter.  Intermediate ammonia solutions
(20 mg/L; stable 4 days) were made by diluting 2 ml stock ammonia solution  to
100 ml with distilled, ammonia-free water.  Standard ammonia solutions con-
taining 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 mg/L were prepared by
dilution of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 ml of intermediate
ammonia solution to 100 ml with distilled ammonia-free water.  A Beckman
double-beam spectrophotometer was used for the absorbance readings.
                                     27

-------
      Because of difficulties in the reproducibility and color  development  in
 determining NH3-N content after Kjeldahl digestion using Scheiner's method,
 ammonia-N was later determined using the scaled-down indophenol method  of
 Strickland and Parsons (80).  For this method phenol solution  was  prepared by
 dissolving 20 g crystalline analytical grade phenol in 200 ml  of 95%  ethyl
 alcohol.   Sodium nitroprusside solution consisted of 1.0 g sodium  nitro-
 prusside  in 200 ml ammonia-free water.  The solution was stable for at  least
 one month.  Alkaline reagent was made by dissolving 100 g sodium citrate and
 5  g analytical grade sodium hydroxide in 500 ml ammonia-free water.   This
 solution  was stable indefinitely.  The oxidizing solution was  prepared  daily
 as needed and consisted of 10 ml reagent grade sodium hypochlorite diluted to
 50 ml with alkaline stock solution.

      Acid-washed 20-ml Pyrex test tubes were filled with ammonia-free water
 and capped with aluminum foil prior to use to lessen contamination by atmo-
 spheric ammonia.  This water was discarded immediately prior to use for a
 determination.   Five ml of sample were then pipetted into each test tube.
 The following solutions were sequentially added with automatic pipets and  the
 samples were vortex mixed after each addition:

          0.2 ml phenol solution;
          0.2 ml nitroprusside solution;
          0.5 ml oxidizing solution.

 The test  tubes  were then capped with aluminum foil and allowed to  stand at
 room temperature for one hour for complete color development.   The color
 produced  is said to be stable for at least 24 hours (80).   Absorbance readings
 and preparation of calibration curves were done according to the previously
 described  method.

 Kjeldahl-Nitrogen Determination

      Total Kjeldahl nitrogen was measured by ammonia determination after
 decomposition of the organically bound nitrogen in the minus three oxidation
 state in  the water sample to ammonia by acid digestion.   This  method  fails to
 account for the nitrogen in azides, azines,  azo,  hydrazones, nitrate, nitrite,
 nitrile, nitroso,  oximes,  and semicarbazones (44).   Several digestion methods
 were used  during the study.   The digestion solution of Scheiner (79)  which
 was employed initially,  consisted of 134 g of potassium sulphate (K2SOi,)
 dissolved  in 650 ml of ammonia-free water and 200 ml of  concentrated  HzSOi,.
 Five ml selenyl chloride (SeOCla)  were added and  the combined  solution  was
 diluted to one  liter,  after  cooling,  with ammonia-free water.   Five ml  of
 this digestion  solution  was  added to a 25-ml water sample  in a 100-ml Kjeldahl
 flask, and heated  under  a hood  until all the water was removed.  The  residue
was  digested for a further 30 minutes and then  cooled  to  room  temperature.
 Small  glass  funnels were inserted  into the mouths  of the  Kjeldahl  flasks to
help the digestion and prevent  loss.   After  the  sample had  cooled, it was
 transferred  to  a 100-ml  beaker  by sequential rinsing with ammonia  free  water
and  neutralized  to pH  7  or greater with  1 M NaOH.   The neutralized sampled
was  then transferred  to  a  100-ml volumetric  flask and  filled to the mark with
ammonia-free water.  Twenty-five ml of  the diluted  neutralized  sample was
 then analyzed according  to Scheiner's ammonia method described  previously.

                                      28

-------
     Other digestion mixtures were employed with essentially the same pro-
cedure.  These included:

     (1)  Standard Methods digestion reagent (44):
     This is the same as Scheiner's reagent with the exception that 2 g of
HgO is used as the catalyst per liter instead of 5 ml selenyl chloride.

     (2)  Mague and Mague digestion reagent (81):
     0.2 g SeOa and 20 g K2SOi, were dissolved in 600 ml ammonia-free distilled
water.  110 ml concentrated reagent grade H2SOi» was then added.  After the
mixture had cooled it was diluted to one liter with ammonia-free water.

     (3)  Strickland and Parsons' digestion reagent (80):
     0.1 g of analytical, reagent-grade selenium dioxide (SeOa) was dissolved
in 500 ml ammonia-free distilled water.  500 ml concentrated, reagent-grade
HzSOi, was then added.  It was diluted to one liter with ammonia-free water
after it had cooled.

Only 2 ml of the Strickland and Parsons' digestion solution was added to each
water sample because of its stronger sulfuric acid content.

     The most satisfactory results were obtained using a modified digestion
solution of Strickland and Parsons' (80) followed by ammonia determination
using the scaled-down indophenol method of Strickland and Parsons described
previously.  Twenty grams of KaSOu was added to each liter of Strickland and
Parsons digestion solution to raise the boiling point of the acid and help
keep it refluxing close to the sample.  Two ml of digestion solution was
added to each 25-ml water sample in a Kjeldahl flask and digested for two
hours following evaporation of the water.  After they had cooled, the acid
residues were each diluted with approximately 10 ml of ammonia-free water
and transferred to 100-ml volumetric flasks.  Sequential rinsing with
additional ammonia-free water assured complete transfer.  The diluted samples
were then neutralized with 1 M NaOH to pH 6.0-7.6 after addition of one drop
of bromothymol blue indicator.  The solution was titrated to the bromothymol
blue endpoint (yellow to faint blue) and then diluted to the mark with
ammonia-free water.  Five-mi aliquots were then analyzed for ammonia by the
scaled-down indophenol method.  The indophenol-blue color intensity was read
against a reagent blank carried through the entire procedure because of the
potential adsorption of atmospheric ammonia by the sulphuric acid during
digestion.

     Great care was required to prevent the contamination of reagents and
samples by atmospheric ammonia or particulate ammonium salts.  Solutions were
kept in tightly stoppered bottles.  All glassware was cleaned copiously with
10% HC1 and rinsed thoroughly with ammonia-free water immediately prior to
use.  Kjeldahl flasks were initially cleaned by steeping them in near-boiling
sulphuric acid for several hours.  Ultra-pure sulfuric acid ('Ultrex,' J.T.
Baker Co.) having a lot analysis of no more than 0.5 ppm ammonia was used in
the digestion solution to ensure a low blank value.

     Calibration curves were obtained with the standard ammonia solution
described in Section entitled "Ammonia-N Determination".  The calibration


                                     29

-------
 curve was stable,  so that recalibration was not  required  for each batch of
 determinations,  or even for new reagents carefully  prepared.  Organic nitrogen
 was  calculated as  the difference between the nitrogen  found for digested
 (Kjeldahl)  and undigested (NHs)  samples.

 Resin Adsorption

      After  the water samples had been filtered through Whatman filter paper
 to remove suspended material, macroreticular resins were  used to remove
 selectively potentially interfering hydrophobic  carbonaceous compounds prior
 to concentration and chromatographic analysis of the remaining organic
 materials.   The XAD macroreticular resins (Rohm  and Haas  Co., Philadelphia,
 PA)  were  thoroughly purified by  sequential  solvent  extractions, of about 10
 grams per batch, with methanol,  acetonitrile and diethylether in a Soxhlet
 extractor for  8 hours per solvent.  The purified resins were stored in glass
 stoppered bottles  under methanol to maintain their  high purity.  Tenax
 (Applied  Science Laboratories Inc., State College,  PA) was purified with
 methanol  and acetonitrile extractions while Ambersorb  XE-340 was supplied
 already purified and hydrated with acetic acid solution from the manufacturer
 (Rohm and Haas Co.).

      The  purified  resins were added as methanol  slurries  into 1 cm I.D. glass
 columns and were used either individually or as  mixed  resin beds.  Single
 resin beds  were  prepared by addition of an  individual  resin to a depth of
 about 6 cm  (1.5-2.0 grams dry resin).   A glass wool plug  was inserted near
 the  stopcock of  the column and above the resin bed.  Mixed resin beds,
 consisted of equal volume combinations of either XAD-2 and XAD-4 or XAD-8 and
 Tenax-GC  macroreticular resins,  and were prepared by sequential addition of
 each resin  to  a  depth of about 6 cm.   Glass wool plus were inserted near the
 stopcock, between  the two resin  beds,  and above  the final resin layer.

      The  procedure for eluting compounds through the prepared column was the
 same for  both  the  single and mixed resin beds.   The methanol was drained to
 the  top of  the uppermost resin bed and then flushed with  approximately 200 ml
 of distilled water.   The distilled water was drained to the top of the resin
 bed  prior to passage of a sample.   A flow rate of about 10 ml/rain was main-
 tained by application of one psi pressure supplied  from a regulated, filtered-
 air  line.   The first 20-ml of eluted sample was  discarded because of the
 corresponding  dead volume in the column containing  the residual distilled
water.  The remaining eluted sample was collected for analysis.  The resin
was  regenerated  after elution of each  liter of sample.  Regeneration was
 initially achieved by equilibration with about 50 ml of methanol and diethyl-
ether  for the  XAD  resins and 100 ml of methanol  of  the Tenax and XE-340
 resins.  The regenerating solvents were discarded.  Later regeneration for
 the  XAD-8 and  Tenax resins was achieved by  sequential equilibration with
 50 ml  of 10~2  M NaOH,  10~2  M HC1,  and  methanol followed by rinsing with
 300 ml distilled water.

      Field  samples initially were passed through the resins without pH ad-
justment.   Later samples were acidified to  pH 2.0 with concentrated
prior  to passage through the resins.
                                     30

-------
     Adsorption of commercially available humic acid on a combination of
XAD-8 and Tenax resins at acid and basic pH values was investigated.   The
humic acid was dissolved in 1 liter of .03 M NaOH.  Acidic humic acid solution
was prepared by titration of about 980 ml of the basic humic acid solution to
pH 2.0 with concentrated HsPOu followed by dilution to one liter with ammonia-
free water.  Humic acid concentration was determined spectrophotometrically
at 330 nm.

     The ability of each macroreticular resin to adsorb selected carbonaceous
substances or nitrogenous organic compounds was investigated by passage of
known concentrations of reference compounds through individual resin beds, or
a combination of them, at several pH values.  Breakthrough curves for indi-
vidual test compounds were determined by measuring their concentrations in
the column effluents after passage of increasing volumes of sample through
the resin.  The filtered aliquots were then analyzed spectrophotometrically.
U.V. absorbance was converted into concentration on the basis of standard
curves of absorbance readings vs. known concentrations of the reference
compound.

     Breakthrough curves for mixtures of test compounds were also determined
by measuring their concentrations in column effluents after passage of in-
creasing volumes of sample through the resin.  The filtered aliquots were
first chromatographed to separate the mixtures into their constituent com-
ponents.  Concentrations of the separated compounds were obtained by
integration of the areas of the resolved chromatographic peaks with a disc
integrator.

Concentration

     One to four liters of water previously filtered through Whatman filter
paper and macroreticular resins was evaporated to approximately 200 ml using
a Buchi, model R, flash evaporator.  Evaporation was carried out below 30°C
to avoid reaction and decomposition.  The partially concentrated sample was
then lyophilized using a VirTis automatic Freeze-Dryer  (Model No. 10-010)  to
remove all remaining water.  The residue was redissolved in the chromato-
graphic eluant, and the resulting mixture centrifuged.  The supernatent was
then ready for chromatographic analysis.  Concentrated  samples were  frozen at
-25°C and stored for several weeks prior to analysis.   Thawed samples were
further centrifuged to remove suspended material  immediately prior to chroma-
tographic analysis.

     Recovery values of total organic nitrogen were determined on samples
concentrated by low temperature distillation and  lyophilization using the
scaled-down indophenol method of Strickland and Parson  (80) described in
Section 2.    These values ranged from  11%  for the non-XAD  filtered  Danvers
bloom sample to 100% for the Concord River  (6/8-78) and Oscillator-La tenuis
resin filtered samples.  A mean organic nitrogen  recovery value of 51.7%
(standard deviation = 29.2%) was observed for  the field samples concentrated
by  this method.
                                      31

-------
Chromatographic Methods

Description of Chromatographic System—
     The Chromatographic system consisted of a DuPont 848 high-pressure pump
with a DuPont 838 programmable gradient accessory, a Schoeffel (Westwood,  NJ)
SF 770 Spectroflow U.V. monitor with a SFA 339 wavelength drive assembly,  a
FS 970 spectrofluoro fluorescence monitor with a wavelength drive, a Duplex
minipump (Laboratory Data Control, Riviera Beach, FL) and a Schoeffel MM 700
module.

     The gradient accessory was used to increase gradually the strength of
the mobile phase during a Chromatographic separation.  Gradient elution
provided better resolution for a wider range of sample polarities than could
be attained by conventional isocratic elution.  The variable wavelength
feature of the U.V. detector provided analytical flexibility to monitor
compounds having maximum absorbance anywhere in the U.V. spectrum.  Both the
U.V. and fluorescence monitors were fitted with wavelength drive mechanisms
for use in identifying unknown peaks by stopped-flow spectrum scanning.  The
memory module provided baseline correction during spectrum  scanning and
gradient programming.  The minipump was used to deliver buffer and reagents
for producing fluorescent derivatives to the column effluent before it
entered the fluorometer.

     Figure 11 is a schematic presentation of the Chromatographic system.
The fluorescence detector could be used without post-column derivatization to
monitor naturally fluorescing compounds, or with post-column derivatization
by introducing fluorescamine (4-phenylspiro-[furan-2(3H),l'-phthalan]-3,3'-
dione) (Hoffman-LaRoche Inc., Nutley, NJ) and borate buffer prior to the
fluorometer.  These reagents react with primary amines to form fluorescent
derivatives.  All Teflon tubing, connectors and tees were purchased from
Rainin Instrument Co.  (Boston, MA).  250-ml reservoir bottles were placed
approximately 3 feet above the minipump and connected to it by 1.5 mm I.D. x
3.0 mm O.D. teflon tubing.  Air displacing the fluorescamine and borate buffer
was first passed through 50% sulphuric acid in a gas trap to remove traces of
primary amines.  The exit valves of the pump were connected to 0.8 mm
I.D. x 1.5 mm O.D. tubing.  Coils A, B, and C were approximately 0.40 m,
1.5 m, and 9.0 m lengths of 0.3 mm I.D. * 1.5 mm O.D. tubing, respectively.
The coiled pieces of tubing, A and B, were inserted to provide sufficient
mixing of the reagents.  Coil C was included to induce sufficient backpressure
to prevent gas bubble  formation when acetone was mixed with the aqueous buffer
at the second tee.  A  back-pressure of about 40 psi was maintained and was
monitored by two liquid pressure gauges.  These gauges also helped to dampen
the pulsating flow of  reagents produced by the positive displacement recipro-
cating piston mechanism of the minipurap.

     Borate buffer was prepared by titrating 0.1 M boric acid to pH 9.3 with
4.5 M LiOH-H20 and was introduced at a flow rate of about 15 ml/hour.  The
f luorescamine solution consisted of 15 mg/L in acetone and was used at a flow-
rate calculated to be  less than 25-30% of the total flow (equal to 15 ml/
hour).  The use of more concentrated fluorescamine solution has been reported
in the literature  (82).  However, reagent precipitation in the lines tends to
occur at such higher concentrations (83).  Fluorescamine is stable at room


                                      32

-------
                                  x-
Wastes-
          Secondary
          Eluant
          Reservoir
          ond
          Gradient
          Device
        High
       Pressure
        Pump
          1°
        Eluant
           H?S04   Borote
                   Buffer
Fluorescomine H2S04
  Reagent
                       Memory Module
Wavelength
Drive
                        Variable
                        Wavelength
                        U.V.
                        Detector
                                                           Liquid
                                                         pressure
                                                          gauges
           Wavelength
             Drive
           Variable
           Wavelength
           Fluorescence
           Detector
                                                                 COIL C
                 Figure  11.   Schematic diagram of chormatographic system,

-------
temperature  in both  solution and powdered form  (83,84).  The acetone solution
and borate buffer  solution were made up only when the reservoirs were de-
pleted.  Before  shut-down of the chromatographic system the tubing was
flused with  column eluant and borate buffer to  avoid precipitation of fluo-
rescamine in the lines.   All glassware was acid washed in dilute HC1 solution.
Caution was  taken  to prevent contamination by traces of primary amine.

     Early work  was  done  using only the isocratic pump and U.V. detector
without wavelength drive.  It was  found then difficult to achieve sharp
resolution of constituent compounds and the analytical ability to identify
unknown substances was  limited severely.  Later funding permitted the
purchase of  the  additional chromatographic equipment described earlier in
this section.  Before purchase of  the fluorometric equipment a preliminary
study was undertaken to evaluate the ability of fluorescamine derivatization
and fluorescence detection to monitor primary amines not detectable by
conventional U.V.  spectroscopy.  Separate one to five ml portions were
collected from the effluent of a chromatographic column after passage of a
concentrated field sample.   Two ml of eluate or diluted eluate was then
allowed to react with 1 ml 0.2 M boric acid buffer (pH 9.5), 1 ml acetone and
0.2 ml fluorescamine solution with vortex mixing after addition of each
reagent.  The buffer was  prepared, as suggested by the manufacturer of fluo-
rescamine (Hoffman LaRoche, Inc.), by titrating 0.2 M boric acid with NaOH.
Stein later  recommended that LiOH  be used in place of the NaOH when using the
boric acid buffer  in post column derivatization procedures, to help avoid
precipitation of fluorescamine in  the lines containing the mixed reagents.
(Stein, S.,  personal communication, Roche Institute of Molecular Biology,
Nutley, NJ   07110.)   The  fluorescamine solution was comprised of 100 mg
fluorescamine per  100 ml  acetone.  The fluorescence intensity of derivatized
sample was read  immediately on a Turner, model  11 fluorescence meter using a
Corning filter 5158  and a combination of filters 4-65 and 3-71 to set the
excitation and emission wavelengths, respectively.  Final fluorescence values
were calculated  from the  differences between sample eluate and chromato-
graphic eluant reagent blank.

Resolution of Injected Samples—
                     f
     Injection volumes—Injection  volumes from  5 to 50 yl of concentrated
sample or reference  compounds were introduced into the chromatographic system
through a Rheodyne (Berkeley,  CA)  model 7120 syringe-loading injector.  The
reference standards,  which were of the highest  quality commercially available,
were not purified  further before use.  The reference compounds were dissolved
either in ammonia-free distilled water or in the chromatographic eluant.
Guanine was  dissolved in  0.14 M LiOH.  The criterion used in determining the
injection quantity was the volume  required to produce maximum on-scale peak
displacement and resolution on the U.V. and fluorescence chart recorders.

     Other investigators  have used larger injection volumes of 100 ]j1 to
165 ml to achieve  improved detection of trace contaminants (85,86).  The
maximum injection  volume  used in this study was limited to the capacity of
the injection loop,  50 yl.   Large-bore columns  would also have been required
to handle the increased load of a  large injection volume.
                                     '34

-------
     Mobile phases and column supports — The different modes of chromato-
graphy studied to attain resolution of the largest number of nitrogenous
compounds included:  (1) cation exchange chromatography (Zipax SCX,  DuPont
Co.);  (2) anion exchange chromatography (Aminex A-27, Bio-Rad Laboratories);
(3)  paired ion chromatography (Zorbax CN, DuPont Co.);  (4) reversed phase
chromatography (Zorbax C-8,  Zorbax CN) and  (5)  normal phase chromatography
(Corasil II, Waters Associates, or Zorbax CN) .   Concentrations of reagents
used in making up sodium acetate-acetic acid;  sodium citrate-citric  acid;
and ammonium acetate-acetic  acid buffers at desired pH values and salt
concentrations were determined from the equation
                          PH = PKa + log       -   .                       (3)
0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH = 6.9) was made from equal molar concentrations of
KHaPO  and Na2HPOi*.  Borax buffer was composed of 0.05 M sodium borate
(Na2Bi»07-5H20)  adjusted with phosphoric acid.

Detection, Identification and Quantification of Resolved Constituents —
     Eluted compounds were detected by U.V. and fluorescence spectroscopy
with or without f luorescamine derivatization.  Identification of unknown
resolved chromatographic peaks was achieved by comparison of retention
position and ultraviolet data with those of reference compounds.  U.V. data
was obtained by stopped-flow spectral scanning of individual chromatographic
peaks.  The memory model was used to store initially the background spectrum
of the mobile phase, flow cell, and photomultiplier, and later subtract this
background spectrum from that of the eluant to obtain the spectrum for the
compound of interest.  The resulting corrected spectra of reference compounds
were then compared with corrected spectra of unknown chromatographic peaks.
Positions of maximum and minimum UV absorbance and relative absorbance at
several wavelengths were used as criteria for compound identification.  In-
ternal standards and fluorescence peaks resulting from f luorescamine respon-
sive compounds were also used to identify unknown constituents.  The internal
standard consisted of a known quantity of reference compound which was
thought to be present in the concentrated field sample.  Sometimes the in-
ternal standard was added to the unknown solution before the chromatographic
separation, while other times it was injected separately immediately before
or after injection of the sample.  When injected with the concentrated field
sample, the suspect peak increased in proportion to the quantity of known
reference compound injected.  Either method compensated for errors made in
the preparation of the eluting solution.  The occurrence of a fluorescent
peak indicated either the presence of a f luorescamine-response primary amine
or a non-derivatized compound also fluorescing at the excitation and emission
wavelengths 'used to detect f luorescamine-responsive compounds (390 nra
excitation, 470 run emission).  The probability of identifying the unknown
peak correctly increased with corroborative evidence from different identi-
fication methods.

     Determination of peak area for some reference compounds was achieved
with a series 200 disc integrator (Disc Instruments, Inc., Santa Anna, CA)
attached to a potentiometric recorder.  The integrator automatically computed
peak area and displayed this computation as a second trace directly under


                                     35

-------
 each recorder peak.  The number of integrator 'counts' was converted to
 concentration units by determination of the number of 'counts' of known
 quantities of reference compounds.  Because of difficulties in maintaining
 the required baseline for proper use of the disc integrator amounts were
 later estimated by measurement of peak heights.


 RESULTS

 Introduction

      A number of different analytical methods, isolation and concentration
 techniques, and chromatographic systems were used to obtain the results
 described in this section.  Although the results of some methods proved to
 be unsatisfactory, the data are presented to give a complete picture for
 future investigators.  The chromatographic results, both prior to and after
 the acquisition of the gradient pump and fluorescence equipment, are pre-
 sented to illustrate the enhanced analytical ability resulting from the use
 of the more sophisticated equipment.

 Retention of Organic Materials on Macroreticular Resins

 Test Compounds—
      The concentration and fractional recoveries of individual test compounds
 after passage of increasing sample volume through macroreticular resins are
 shown in Appendix A (Tables A-l to A-23).   Concentration values were calcu-
 lated from least-square-fit equations determined from absorbance measurements
 of reference compounds at several concentrations (Appendix A,  Table A-24).
 Recovery values were calculated according to the equation:

       % recovery  =  effluent concentration of test compound             (..
                      influent concentration of test compound       '

 The percentage recoveries of constituents in mixtures of nitrogenous  com-
 pounds after passage of  increasing sample volumes through a combination of
 XAD-8 and Tenax resins are shown in Appendix A (Tables A-25 and A-26).
 Recovery values were calculated from concentration measurements determined
 either by peak height (H)  or peak area (A)  on chromatograms of the  resolved
 mixture.   The approximate volume of sample filtered at 80% and 90%  recovery
 and  the ultimate percentage recoveries for the individual compounds and
 mixtures  of test compounds are summarized  in Tables 5 and 6, respectively.
 100%  recovery of constituent compounds in a mixture containing:   5-chloro-
 uracil,  barbituric acid,  thymine,  guanine,  creatinine, purine,  pyrrole,
 adenine and tryptophan was observed after  passage of only 70 ml through
 XAD-8 resin alone.   Recovery values of constituent compounds in a mixture
 containing  these nine nitrogenous  materials after equilibrium  for 15 minutes
 in various  resin slurries  are shown in Table 7.

      Recovery values greater than  90% after passage of less than 100 ml of
 sample  or after  equilibration for  15  minutes in  resin slurries occurred for
most  nitrogenous compounds using the  XAD and/or  Tenax resins under  the  in-
dicated conditions.   One  noteworthy exception was the poor recovery of  indole


                                     36

-------
TABLE 5.  RECOVERY OF INDIVIDUALLY TESTED NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH
                                 MACRORETICULAR RESINS
Compound
Adenlne

Adenlne

5-Chlorouracll

5-Chlorouracll

Creatlne

Creatlnlne

Cytoalne

Cytoalne

Cytoalne

Humlc Acid

Humlc Acid

Indole

Influent
Concentra-
tion (rag/L)
9.54

9.64

9.69

10.43

10.0

3.19

8.56

8.35

10.0

13.48

18.34

8.74

Reeln(a)
XAD-8 &
Tenax
XAD-8 &
Tenax
XAD-8 6
Tenax
XAD-8 &
Tenax
Tenax &
XAD-8
XAD-2 &
XAD-4
XAD-2 6
XAD-4
XAD-2 &
XAD-4
Tenax 6
XAD-8
XAD-8 &
Tenax
XAD-8 &
Tenax
XAD-2 &
XAD-4
Condi tlona
pH 2.5

pH 7.1

pH 2.0

pH 7.01

pH
unadjuated
pH 2
with HC1
pH
unadjusted
pH 3
with HNOj
PH
unadjusted
pH 2

pH 11.7

10-3
NaOH
•la to mis to
801 break- 90S break-
through through
50 80

60 80

60 80

45 65

80 95

65

75

40 165

71 91

-

120

— _

Ultimate
recovery
(Z) a
98.95

100

100

100

99.17

81

88

90

96

J6.0

87.9

10.3

•la filtered
at ultimate
recovery
300-350

300-350

175-200

350-400

266-286

90-190

175-200

165-190

206-287

475-545

175-200

125-215

Adaorptlve
capacity of
realn(a) for ,
teat compound
0.16

0.19

0.19

0.16

0.27

0.07

0.21

0.11

0.24

_

-

-

                                                                           (continued)

-------
                                            TABLE 5  (continued)
Cnpound
Indole
Purlne
Purine
Pyrlnldlne
w Pyrlmldlne
GO
Succlnimlde
Succlnimlde
Trypcophan
Trypeophan
Uracil
Influent
Concentra-
tion (ng/L)
6.57
10.00
10.24
10.0
9.75
30.00
30.00
9.66
10.0
10.0
Realo(s)
XAD-4
XAD-8 &
Tenax
XAD-8 &
Tenax
XAD-8 &
Tenax
XAD-8 6
Tenax
XAD-8 &
Tenax
XAD-8 &
Tenax
XAD-8 6
Tenax
XAD-8 6
Tenax
XAD-8
Conditions
lO'3
HNOj
pH 2.0
pH 7.0
pH 2.0
pH 7.0
pH 2.0
pH 7.05
pH 2.0
pH 6.9
PH
unadjusted
•la to
BOX break-
through
-
35
30
70
50
175
60
150
35
56
•la to
90Z break-
through
-
60
40
175
65
250
125
300
45
72
Ultlaate
recovery
«£
4.8
98.18
100
94.62
99.32
93.00
93.15
92.52
100.00
98
•la filtered
at ultimate
recovery
2^0-370
150-175
175-200
250-300
350-400
350-400
175-200
350-400
350-400
147-322
Adaorptlve
capacity of
realn(a) for
test coopound "
mg/g

0.12
0.10
0.23
0.16
1.75
0.60
0.48
0.12
0.37
t Recovery • (maxlnua effluent concentration/Influent concentration), x 100



Adaorptlve capacity calculated at SOX recovery(for 3 g combined resin)

-------
     TABLE 6.  RECOVERY OF MIXTURE OF NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX RESINS
                                              (3 GRAMS TOTAL RESIN)
(.0
compound
uracil
Indole
tyrosine
purine
guanine
cytosine
adenine
creatinine
tryptophan
uracil
indole
tyrosine
purine
guanine
cytosine
adenine
creatinine
tryptophan
condition



pH of
mixture
unadjusted




11 £
pH of
tn-f vf 11T*P
•iij. A 1»UL C
adjusted to
pH 2.0 with
HP1
n\j j.


concen-
tration
(mg/L)
5
5
10
10
15
40
20
50
20
5.0
5.0
10.0
10.0
15.0
40.0
20.0
50.0
20.0
mis to
80%
break-
through
45
-
100
100
200
100
150
100
100
100
_
100
75
50
100
75
200
mis to
90%
break-
through
100
-
200
100
300
150
200
200
100
150
_
150
150
50
100
75
200
ultimate
recovery
(%;a
100
0
100
100
91.4
100
100
100
100
100
_
100
100
100
100
100
100
mis
filtered
at ultimate
recovery
200
400
300
200
300
300
300
300
300
300
500
150
300
300
300
300
200
adsorptlve
capacity of
resins for test
compounds (mg/g)
.08
-
.34
.34
1.00
1.33
1.00
1.67
0.67
.17
_
.33
.25
.37
0.67
0.67
1.25
1.33
      %  recovery « (maximum effluent concentration/influent concentration) x 100

       adsorptlve capacity calculated at 80% recovery.

-------
TABLE  7.   RECOVERY OF MIXTURE OF NITROGENOUS  COMPOUNDS AFTER EQUILIBRATION

               FOR 15 MINUTES IN RESIN  SLURRY  (pH  UNADJUSTED)3
Compound
5-chlorouracil
barbituric acid
thymine
guanine
creatinine
purine
pyrrole
adenine
tryptophan
recovery
from XE
slurry
35
75
39
0
25
0
0
13
42
recovery
from Tenax
slurry'3
88-100
100
98-100
100
100
93-100
95-100
95-100
79-100
recovery
from XAD-8
slurry
100
100
84-100
100
85-100
63- 89
-
49- 68
72- 95
•a
  Upper percentage numbers  are maximum  recovery values computed from the
  highest observed concentration of  compound after equilibration with resin
  slurry divided by  the  lowest observed concentration value of compound deter-
  mined before equilibration with resin slurry.

                         /concentration  of  compound after \
         % recovery  =  [ equilibration  with resin slurry  \ x
                        I concentration of compound before  I
                         \equilibration  with resin slurry/



  Single or initial  numbers are mean values.
after passage through all  the resins tested.  Most nitrogenous compounds
were strongly adsorbed  onto  XE resin and,  therefore, poor recovery values
were observed.  No significant differences were observed for the recovery
values of nitrogenous compounds  through different resins with or without pH
adjustment.  Humic acid, however, was more strongly adsorbed onto a combi-
nation of XAD-8 and Tenax  resins at pH 2.0 than at pH 11.7.

     The variability in recovery values obtained from different chromatograms
of resolved mixtures of nitrogenous compounds (Appendix A, Tables A-25 and
A-26) is partially attributable  to the difficulty in maintaining the baseline
on the potentiometric chart  recorder at zero, as is required for proper
operation of the disc integrator.  Baseline fluctuation in excess of the 3%
recommended for maximum drift correction was frequently encountered, making
integration difficult and  inexact.  This problem may also have contributed
to the somewhat greater recovery values observed in these mixtures in


                                     40

-------
comparison with the recovery values obtained with individually tested
compounds.

     The adsorptive capacities of the resins for the several tested compounds
are shown in Tables 5 and 6.  These values were calculated from the equation:

                                   influent      liters filtered to
         Adsorptive capacity  =  concentration	reach 80% recovery
     (mg compound/gram resin)              grans resin used

and represent the maximum quantity of compound adsorbed per weight of resin.
Quantities of compounds exceeding the adsorptive capacities will break
through into the column effluent.  The adsorptive capacity of the resins
(with the exception of indole) for the N-organic compounds ranged from only
0.08 to 1.75 mg per gram of resin as compared to the greater adsorption
(5-25 mg carbon per gram resin) of non-nitrogenous compounds reported in the
literature (87,88).  In addition, the similar values obtained from filtered
mixtures of N-organic compounds and individually tested materials indicate a
non-competitive adsorption phenomenon.

NH3-N and Kjeldahl-N—
     Adsorption of NH3-N and total Kjeldahl-N onto the macroreticular resins
was also examined.  Table 8 summarizes the percentages of NH3-N, Kjeldahl-N,
and organic-N found to pass through the macroreticular resins under study.
The mean percentage recoveries for NH3-N, Kjeldahl-N, and organic-N, for the
different filtration conditions and their standard deviation are shown in
Table 9.  Statistical tests (Table 9) showed that the observed differences in
recoveries were not attributable to the different resins and conditions used
within the indicated confidence intervals.  Over 93% of the NH -N and 88% of
the organic-N contained in the field and laboratory samples were not adsorbed
onto the individual resins or combinations of resins tested.

Kjeldahl-N and NHa-N Determination

Concentration vs. Absorbance Data—
     Concentration vs. absorbance readings at 635 nm using Scheiner's (79)
method and the scaled down procedure of Strickland and Parsons (80) are
shown in Tables 10 and 11, respectively.  The following least squares linear
equations were derived from these data and were used to calculate unknown
Kjeldahl-N and NH3-N concentrations in field and laboratory samples from U.V.
absorbance readings.  The equations were constrained to pass through the
origin.

        NH3-N[mg/L] = 1.265[(mg/L)/AU] x (absorbance at 635 nm)[AU]      (6)
                                         (Scheiner's method)

     Kjeldahl-N[mg/L] = 1.475[(mg/L)/AU] x (absorbance at 635 nm)[AU]    (7)
                                         (Scheiner's method)

        NH.-N and Kjeldahl-N[mg/L] =
                  1.070[(mg/L)/AU] x (absorbance at 635 nm)[AU]          (9)
                                         (Strickland and Parsons' method)

                                     41

-------
              TABLE 8.  PERCENTAGES OF NITROGENOUS MATERIAL PASSING THROUGH MACRORETICULAR RESINS*
to
—
date
11/15/77
12/1/77
12/16/77
1/30/78
3/2/78
3/2/78
3/2/78
3/2/78
3/9/78
3/9/78
5/3/78
method of
NH3-N deter-
mination &
pH conditions
N-l
N-l
N-l
N-l
N-l
N-l
N-l
N-l
N-l
N-l
N-l
source0
Charles River
Spy Pond
Charles River
Charles River
Billerica WTP influent
Billerica WTP effluent
Lawrence WTP influent
Lawrence WTP effluent
Marlboro West WW
pre C12
Marlboro West WW
post Cl2
Marlboro West WW
pre Cl2
resin
XAD-4 &
XAD-2
XAD-4 &
XAD-2
XAD-8
XAD-8
XAD-8
XAD-8
XAD-8
XAD-8
XAD-8
XAD-8
XAD-8 &
Tenax
%
NH3-N
99
100
98
100
100
100
81
96
98
99
89
recoveries
Kjeldahl-N
87
100
95
100
100
100
100
52
93
100
75

organic-N
78
100
94
100
100
100
100
48
89
100
62
                                                                                (continued)

-------
                                               TABLE 8 (continued)
u>
date
6/9/78

6/14/78


6/21/78


6/21/78


6/23/78


incubation
day 44


incubation
43
method of
NH3-N deter-
mination & ,
pH conditions
N-2

N-2


N-2


A-2


A- 2


A-2



day A-2

c
source
Billerlca water supply

Lawrence water supply
(first 100 ml)
(100-1,000 ml)
Danvers water supply
(first 100 ml)
(100-1,000 ml)
Danvers water supply
(first 100 ml)
(100-1,000 ml)
Ohio supply
(first 100 ml)
(100-1,000 ml)
flask //2 Oscillatoria
tenuis
(first 100 ml)
(100-1,000 ml)
flask #2 Anabaena
fjjps aquae
resin
XAD-8 &
Tenax
XAD-8 &
Tenax

XAD-8 &
Tenax

XAD-8 &
Tenax

XAD-8 &
Tenax

XAD-8 &
Tenax


XAD-8 &
Tenax

NH3-N
92


81
93

0
100

91
-

100
35


100
68
100

% recoveries
Kjeldahl-N
100


84
97

66
100

76
83

84
87


37
73
72


organlc-N
100


86
98

67
98

78
83

82
91


35
73
71

                                                                                    (continued)

-------
                                      TABLE 8  (continued)
date
method of
NH3-N deter-
mination &
pH conditions
                                                                       % recoveries
                              source
resin
Kjeldahl-N    organic-N
7/4/78

7/11/78
A-2

A-2
Billerlca:
Bridge Street
Danvers bloom
XAD-8 &
Tenax
XAD-8 &
76

94
81

98
82

98
                              (filtered to 0.62 ym)  Tenax
  Samples eluted through approximately 3 g (dry weight)  resin or combination of resins.
  % recoveries were determined after elution of 1 liter  of sample through the individual resin or
  resin combination.
   N = Influent pH value unadjusted
   A = influent pH adjusted to 2.0 with
   1 = NH3 determined using Sheiner's method
   2 » NH3 determined using Strickland and Parsons'  method

   WTP = water treatment plant
   WW  = waste water
   pre Cl2 = pre chlorinated
   post Cl2 - post chlorinated

-------
TABLE 9.   MEAN PERCENTAGE  RECOVERIES  OF  Nl^-N,  KJELDAHL-N, AND ORGANIC-N THROUGH MACRORETICULAR RESINS
Influent
resins pH value
XAD-8 & pH 2
Tenax
XAD-8 & unadjusted
Tenax (neutral)
XAD-2 6 unadjusted
XAD-4 or (neutral)
XAD-B
alone
overall -
average
for all
resins &
conditions
tested
mean percent recovery
(standard deviation) t-statlstlc
NH3-N
86
(13)
94
(4)
97
(6)

94
(9)




KJeldahl-N
82
(10)
93
(12)
93
(15)

90
(13)




organ Ic-N N N recovery
83 6 -0.65
(10) (8)
90 4 -0.12
(18) (12)
91 10 0.42
(17)

88 20 -
(15)




F accept or
P(|t|>computed statistic reject
t value) (two for organic null
tailed test)c N recovery*1 hypothesis
53Z 3.25 accept
(6.23)
91Z 1.23 sccept
(4.47)
68Z 1.23 accept
(2.77)

• • —





    *H  • sample site



     t • (Xj - X2)/(S1/n1 + S2/n2)   ;  where degrees of freedoa are indicated  in parentheses (• HJ + i»2 - 2);  t test

                                                                                 *
     performed on recovery values for conditions shown in successive line of table; S  • variance.



    0 P(|t|>conputed C value):  expected frequency of observing given difference In means assuming both sample  means taken

                              from same population.



     S./$2 • —$- F(N1 -  1, NZ - 1); number  In parenthesis is  the SZ level (two tailed) of the distribution of  P

             °1
    •                    22
     Null hypothesis: a\  • 02, i.e.,  sample variance taken  from same population

-------
TABLE 10.  CONCENTRATION vs. ABSORBANCE  READINGS8 AT  635  run
                     (1 cm PATHLENGTH)•
determination
NH3-N






Kjeldahl-N







concentration of
standard (mg/L)
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
0.80
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.20
O.AO
0.40
0.60
0.60
absorbance
at 635 run
.095
.101
.147
.307
.463
.635
.639
0.026
0.026
0.105
0.103
0.260
0.265
0.422
0.423
 Determined 'by Scheiner's method  (79).
                            46

-------
                                           TABLE 11.
NH3-N CONCENTRATION vs. ABSORBANCE AT 635 run DETERMINED BY STRICKLAND AND PARSONS'  (80)
                                INDOPHENOL-HYPOCHLORITE METHOD
concentration
(mg/L)
0.10
0.30
0.50
replicates of

a
0.104
0.294
0.450

b
0.099
0.277
0.472
absorbance at 635 nm a

c
0.100
0.275
0.485

d
0.094
0.287
0.500

e
0.080
0.287
0.440

f
0.086
0.245
0.458

mean
0.094
0.278
0.468

standard deviation
.009
.017
.023
a
1 cm cell

-------
where
                      AU =  absorbance  units =  -log —   .
                                                   o

     Strickland  and  Parsons'  scaled down method was used in later work of
this research because of its  excellent  reproducibility  (9.5%, 6.1%, and 4.9%
standard deviations  at 0.1, 0.3,  and  0.5 mg/L NH3-N, respectively), and ease
in analyzing replicate samples.   Reagent blanks were carried throughout all
procedures because of increased absorbance attributable to ambient NH3-N
contamination.   Typical NH3-N reagent blank absorbance readings (635 run),
after Kjeldahl digestion using different digestion solutions and durations
are shown in Appendix A (Table A-28).   All the digestion conditions yielded
similarly low reagent blank values with good  reproducibility.  A mean of
0.149 AU and standard deviation equal to 0.014 AU (9.5%) were observed for
replicate reagent blank absorbance values of  digestion solution D read against
a dstilled water reference.   Mean NH3-N reagent blank absorbance readings
(635 nm) without digestion were 0.050 mg/L and 0.04 mg/L, using reagent grade
sodium hypochlorite  solution  and  commercial Chlorox bleach, respectively.
The calculated mean  reagent blank absorbance  value for digestion solution D
with an undigested NH3-N reagent  blank  reference was, therefore, 0.105 AU, or
0.11 mg/L NH3-N.  The blank values were most  likely attributable to absorption
of atmospheric ammonia by  sulfuric acid.

Kjeldahl Digestion Solutions—
     Table A-29  in Appendix A shows Kjeldahl-N concentration values for
several field samples obtained after  digestion with sulfuric acid solutions
containing different catalysts for several periods of time.  SeOCla and SeOa
as catalysts yielded similar,  consistent, results after 1, 2 or 3 hours of
digestion.  One  very poor  recovery of Kjeldahl-N was observed using HgO as
catalyst.

Field and Laboratory Samples—
     Table 12 shows  Kjeldahl-N, NH3-N and organic-N concentrations of field
and laboratory samples.  Organic  nitrogen was computed as the difference
between nitrogen values  after  digestion (Kjeldahl-N) and before digestion.
Organic nitrogen comprised 65-99% of  the total Kjeldahl-N of the water supply
samples (mean =84%,  standard  deviation = 14%) , and ranged from 0.30-21.7 mg/L.
The unusually high organic-N  content  in the second Danvers water supply
sample was attributable  to the extracellular  products of a blue-green algal
bloom that was occurring at the time  of sampling.  The possibility that algal
cell materials rather than extracellular products were contributing to this
high organic-N value was investigated by measuring the organic-N content
after further filtration to 0.7 ym.   Although the bulk of residual green
color was removed by the ultrafiltration, no  decrease in organic-N or NH3-N
was observed.  The mean  'non-bloom' organic-N content and standard deviation
for the water supplies were 0.76  mg/L and 0.24 mg/L, respectively.

Concentration Efficiencies

     By concentration efficiency  is meant the percentage of original organic-
nitrogen found still present  after concentration.  Concentration efficiencies
for field samples and test compounds were calculated from Kjeldahl-N and U.V.

                                      48

-------
TABLE 12.  NH3-N AND KJELDAHL-N DETERMINATIONS
date
11/15/77
12/1/77
12/16/77
1/30/78
3/2/78
3/2/78
3/2/78
3/2/78
3/9/78

3/9/78

3/9/78
,
6/9/78

6/14/78

6/21/78

pR valiu
6 NHj-N.
method a
Nl
Nl
Nl
Nl
Nl
Nl
Nl
Nl
Nl

Nl

Nl

N2

N2

N2


non-resin
filtered
, Kjeld-N
source (mg/L)
Charles River
Spy Pond
Charles River
Charles River
Blllerlca WTP Inf.
Blllerlca WTP eff.
Lawrence WTP inf.
Lawrence WTP eff.
Marlboro E. WW
pre Cl.
Marlboro W. WW
pre C\2
Marlboro W. WW
post Cl2
Blllerlca water
supply
Lawrence water
supply
(first 100 ml)
(100-1.000 ml)
Danvers water supply
(first 100 ml)
(100-1.000 ml)
1.9
0.8
7.3
5.1
0.9
0.7
1.5
1.3
0.1

4.4

4.3

0.4


0.8
0.7
-
NU-j-N Z
(mg/L)
0.8
0.3
1.4
1.8
0.3
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.1

1.8

2.1

0.1


0.2
0.1
-
non-resin
filtered
organ Ic-
N
60
66
81
66
65
91
68
92
0

60

52

69


75
99
-
Z NII3-N
40
34
19
34
35
9
32
8
100

40

48

31


25
1
-
resin
filtered
KJeld-N
(mg/L)
1.7
0.8
6.9
5.3
2.7
1.1
1.8
0.7
0.1

4.0

4.4

0.5


0.6
0.7
0.5
0.7
NH3-N
(mg/L)
O.B
0.3
1.4
1.8
0.5
0.1
0.4
0.1
0.1

1.7

2.1

0.1


0.2
0.2
0
0.1
organic
nitrogen
non-resin
filtered
me/L
1.2
0.5
5.9
3.4
0.6
0.6
1.1
1.2
0

2.6

2.2

0.3


0.6
0.6
0.7
0.7
res In
filtered
mg/L
0.9
0.6
5.5
3.5
2.2
1.1
1.4
0.6 *
0

2.3

2.2

0.3


0.5
0.6
0.5
0.7
                                             (continued)

-------
                                         TABLE  12 (continued)

pH value

•
& HHj-Na .
date method source

6/21/78 A2


_ _

_ „


6/23/78 A2


Incubation A2
day: 44


incubation A2
day: 43
7/4/78 A2

7/4/78 A2

Danvers water
(first 100 ml)
(100-1,000 ml)
huinlc acid
(19.9 mg/L)
humlc acid
(19.9 mg/L
replicate
Ohio supply
(first 100 ml)
(100-1.000 ml)
flask n
non-resin
filtered

Kjeld-N
(mg/L)

supply
0.7
-
0.5

0.4



0.6
-
•

NH3-N
(mg/L)


0.1
-
0.1

0.1



0.1
-

non-resin resin
filtered filtered

X organlc-
N


98
-
91

82



92
-


X NH3-N Kjeld-N
(mg/L)


2 0.5
06
9

19



R 0.5
0.5
•

NH3-N
(mg/L)


0.1
0.1
_

.



0.1
0.1

organic nitrogen

non-resin
filtered
rur/L

0.7
0.7
0.4

0.3



0.5
0.5


resin
filtered
mg/L '

0.5
0.6
_

-



0.5
0.3

Osclllatoria tenula
(first 100 ml)
(100-1,000 ml)
flask 92
Anahaena floa
Blllerlca
(River Street)
Blllerlca
1.8
-

aquae 2.3
1.6

2.8
0.1
-

0.1
0.1

1.0
97
-

98
92

65
3 0.7
1.3

2 1.7
8

35 2.2
0.1
0.1

0.4
_

0.7
1.8
1.8

2.2
1.5

1.8
0.6
1.3

1.6
.

1.5
(Bridge Street)
7/11/78 A2

Danvers bloom
filtered to 0.
22.0
62 ion)
0.3

99

1 21.5

0.3

22.0

21.2

,
N • influent pH value unadjusted                                UTP • vater treatment'plant
A i influent pH adjusted to 2.0 vlth 113704                       WW  • waste water
1 • NHj determined using Shelner's method (79)                  pre Cl2 - pre chlorinated
2 - NH3 determined using Strickland and Parsons' method (80)    post C12 • post chlorinated
Inf. • influent
eff. • effluent

-------
absorbance measurements, respectively.   Table 13 summarizes the organic
nitrogen recovery values of field samples subjected to low temperature
rotary evaporation from a pear shaped flask followed by lyophilization and
dissolution in chromatographic mobile phase solvent.  Recovery values of field
samples subjected to this method were variable, raging from 11% to 100% and
having a mean of 51% and a standard deviation of 29%.  Incomplete recovery of
organic nitrogen in these samples was attributed to:  incomplete transfer of
lyophilized materials, and inability to redissolve all the lyophilized
material in the small volume of solvent required to achieve a 1,000 to 2,000
fold concentration factor.  Recovery values greater than 100% for some samples
was attributed to the presence of small quantities of particulate or colloidal
materials in the concentrated sample.  It is thought that the presence of
these undissolved materials during acid digestion resulted in increased or-
ganic nitrogen values in the digested solution.

     The lowest recovery values were observed in the raw and resin-filtered
Middleton Pond sample (11% and 13%, respectively), which had been collected
during the occurrence of a blue-green algae bloom.  The amount of lyophilized
material, in the raw and filtered sample was substantially greater than for
other sites.  This was partially attributed to the comparatively greater
level or organic nitrogen (equal to about 21 mg/L) in the sample.  It was
therefore hypothesized that the inability to completely dissolve this larger
amount of lyophilized material in the required small volume of solvent re-
sulted in the lower recovery values.

     The mean recovery value for the field and laboratory samples, excluding
the Middleton Pond site just discussed, was equal to 60% (standard deviation =
24%).  This represented a somewhat greater value for the recovery of nitro-
genous organic material than obtained using the low temperature evaporation
procedure previously described.

Chromatographic Resolution of Reference Compounds

Initial Studies:  Isocratic Elution—
     A number of liquid chromatographic conditions were tested for their
ability to resolve mixtures of known nitrogenous compounds.  The results are
shown in Appendix A (Tables A-32 to A-36).  Attempts to separate nitrogenous
mixtures on Aminex A-27 using 0.325 M ammonium acetate eluant, on Zipax SCX
using perchloric, phosphoric, acetic and nitric acid mobile phases of varying
strength, and on Zorbax CN using sodium-acetate-acetic-acid buffer with
varying acetonitrile or methanol composition proved unsuccessful.  Separation
was later achieved on the Zipax column using mobile phases comprised of either
KHaPOi,, KaHPOi,, NaH2POit, or NH^HaPOi, at different molar concentrations and
adjusted to pH values of 2.5, 3.5, or 4.5 (Tables 14 to 16).  Resolution of
the larges number of compounds on this column was achieved using NaH2POi» or
NHi,H2POi, adjusted to pH 2.5 with HsPOi,.  Compounds were eluted more rapidly
using eluants having greater salt concentrations, and at more elevated temper-
atures.  Acetonitrile modifier did not improve resolution.  Additional column
length increased retention time but did not improve resolution of rapidly
eluting compounds.  Elution with a weaker mobile phase (distilled water ad-
justed to pH 2.5 with H3POi,) did not improve the resolution of this group of
                                      51

-------
          TABLE  13.   CONCENTRATION EFFICIENCY:   ROTARY EVAPORATION IN PEAR-SHAPED FLASK FOLLOWED BY
                     LYOPHILIZATION AND DISSOLUTION IN CHROMATOGRAPHIC MOBILE PHASE SOLVENT
Cn
10


sample
Concord River,
Billerica, MA
6/8/78c
Merrimack River,
Lawrence, MA,
6/lA/78c
Middle ton Pond,
Danvers, MA
6/21/78£
O&CA^lcutofUa. tejnwii
flask //2c
flask //3d
bnabae.no. ftto& aquae.
flask //2C
flask //3d
surface impoundment
Bethesda. Ohioc
organlc-N
before
concentration
(mg/L)
0.3


0.6


0.6



0.6
1.1

2.2
2.8
0.5



concentration
factor
2,000


2,000


2,000



1,630
1,800

1,615
1,750
2,000

calculated
organ! c-N
value after
concentration3
(mg/L)
671


1,182


1,130



1,006
2,030

3,621
4,818
986

observed
organic-N
value after
concentration
(mg/L)
965


755


582



1,157
983

1,236
1,925
610


concentration
efficiency^
(%)
MOO


64


52



>100
48.

35
40
62

                                                                                 (continued)

-------
                                             TABLE 13 (continued)
     sample
                       organic-N
                       before
                       concentration
                          (mg/L)
concentration
factor
calculated
organlc-N
value after
concentration
  (mg/L)
observed
organlc-N
value after
concentration
  (mg/L)
                                                                                              concentration
                                                                                              efficiency
U)
Concord River,             1.8
(Bridge Street)
Billerica, MA
7/4/78c

Middleton Pond,           21.3
Danvers, MA
(filtered to 0.1 pm)
7/ll/78c

Middleton Pond,           21.7
Danvers, MA
(filtered to 0.1 ym)
7/ll/78)d
                                               1,000
                                               1,000
                                               1,000
                  1,840
                 21,280
                 21,681
                    797
                  2,840
                  2,448
                  43
                  13
                  11
     a
       Calculated  organic-N value after concentration »  organic-N value before  concentration x  concentration
       factor  (assumes  100% recovery)

       Concentration  efficiency  = (observed  organic-N value  after concentration)/(calculated organic-N
       value after concentration)

     c  Filtered  through XAD-8  and Tenax GC macroreticular  resins
      Unfiltered

-------
                                                                                            a
TABLE 14.    RETENTION VALUES  (ML) OF  A MIXTURE CONTAINING 11 N-ORGANIC COMPOUNDS   ON ZIPAX SCX
.05 N KH2P04 .05 M K2HPOft
adjusted to adjusted to
•lution pH 2.5 with pH 2.5 with
position H3P04 H3P04
1 1.4 1.5
2 2.0 2.0
3 3.3 2.9
4 4.7 3.4
5 8.5 4.9
6 10.8 6.3
7 17.5 12.8
8
9
10
11
12
.05 M NaH2P04 .05 M Na2HPO«
adjusted to adjusted to •
pH 2.5 with pH 2.5 with
H3P04 H3P04
1.4
1.9
2.7
3.4
4.9
5.6
6.7
8.6
12.0
20.1
28.2

1.4
2.0
2.5
3.2
4.2
5.3
6.7
11.6
15.9
no other peaks
observed after
elution of addi-
tional 100 Bl
.01 M NaH2P04
adjusted to
.05 N NaH2P04 pH 2.5 with
pH 4.5 H3P04
1.6
3.3
12.6
18.7
23.1
no other peaks
observed after
elution of addi-
tional 127 al




1.9
2.1
6.9
9.1
14.1
20.0
26.0
31.8
41.7
72.0
95.0
104.3
     1 uracll.  indole, alanlne, tyrosioe. purine. guanlne. creatine, cytosine. adenlne, crcatinine, tryptophan;
      elution  order of these coapounds was not determined.

-------
                TABLE  15.   RETENTION VALUES (ML)  OF NITROGENOUS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ON ZIPAX SCX
                                 (ONE METER COLUMN UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED)
Ul
.05 M .01 M .05 N H20 .005 N .05 H .05 M .05 M .05 M .05 H NH&H2P04
NH^PO^ NH^PO^ NH41I2P04 adjusted Nh$H2P04 NII^I^PO^ NaH2P04 sodium NH6H2P04 adjunted to pH
adjusted adjusted adjusted to pH adjusted adjusted adjusted perchlorate adjusted 2.5 with I^POft
to pH 2.5 to pH 2.5 to pH 2.5 2.5 with to pH 2.5 to pH 2.5 to pH 2.5 adjusted to to pH 2.5 10Z acetonltrlla
with H3P04 with H3P04 with H3P04 h^PO* with h*3P04 with h^PO* with HsPOft pll 2.5 with H3P04 3 meter column
Compound temperature temperature with per- 3 meter
• 50°C - 10°C chloric acid column
1.
2.
3.

4.
5.
6.

7.
8.
9.
10.

11.
12.
13.

14.
IS.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
d-l serlne
uric acid
barbituric
acid
succlnlnlde
t-histldlne
t-aspartlc
acid
taurlne
uracll
pyrrole
2,6,8, trl-
chloropurlne
5-clilorouracil
thymlne
l-hydroxy-
prollne
Imtole
caffeine
alanlne
glyclne
glycylglyclne
m- ami no phenol
pyrlmldlne
1
1
1

1
1
1

1
1
2
1

1
1
1

2
2
2
2
2
2
3
.7
.5
.5

.9
.7
.6

.7
.5
.0
.9

.3
.5
.9

.2 2.0
.4
.7 1.8
.1
.4
.3 & 4.3
.3
1.6
1.4 2
1

1.6 1
1.5


1.6
1.0 1.4 1.3 1.5 1
1



1.6 1.6 1


1.4 1.4 2.1 2.1 2.0 1

1.8 1.4 1.4 ft 7.3 2.8 3.5 9
1.6


1.4 3.3 4

.0
.2

.7 4.3




.3
.6



.4 4.6 4.4


.7

.5



.2
                                                                                 (continued)

-------
                                             TABLE  15  (continued)
Ul
.05 N
NH4H2P04
adjusted
to pH 2.5
with H3P04

Conpound

21. tyros Ine 4.6
22. purlne 5.4
23. guanlne 6.0
24. creatlna 8.6
25. cytoslne 10.5
26. adenlne 12.5
27. creatlnine 15.0
28. pyrrole 2.0
29. tryptophan 25.3
30. urea ND
31. humic acid 13.5
32. phenyl-
a Ian Ine
33. t-prollne 20.3
34. mixture: 8, all re-
14, 16, 29, solved
21-27

35. Marlboro W.
concentrated
effluent: 2.3
spiked wlthi
guanine 8.0
cytoslne 9.8
creatlnine 13.7
tryptophan 17.9
.01 M .05 M
NH4H2P04 NH4H2P04
adjusted adjusted
to pH 2.5 to pH 2.5
with H3P04 with H3P04
temperature
. 50°C

2.1
2.7
5.8 3.9
5.5
5.9
7.0 7.6
7.8 8.6

ND





all
resolved










H20 .005 M .05 M
adjusted NH4H2P04 NH^POi
to pH adjusted adjusted
2.5 with to pH 2.5 to pH 2.5
H3P04 with H3P04 with H3P04
.05 M
NaH2P04
adjusted
to pH 2.5
with H3P04
temperature
. 10°C

3.3
6.5
7.7
10.0
12.2
17.2
18.9

ND





only two
initial
peaka
observed










6.0
8.3
10.5

20.2
22.8


45.0
ND

29.4








3.0 & 12.4

11.5
19.6
26.2
42.0
.05 M .05 M
sodium NH^Il2P04
perchlorate adjusted
ad lusted to to pH 2.5
pH 2.5 with H3P04
with per- 3 meter
chloric column
acid
9.4
29.9
38.8
20.4
29.2 37.6
31.9 45.8
26.5 53.1
4.3
91.5


_














.05 M NH4H2P04
adjusted to pH
2.5 with H3P04
10Z acetonltrlle
3 meter column










4.2


















                                                                                  (continued)

-------
                                                        TABLE  15  (continued)






Compound
.OS H
NH4H2P04
adjuatad
to pH 2.S
with H3P04


.01 M
HH«H2P04
adjuated
to pH 2.5
with H3P04


.05 M
NH4H2P04
adjuated
to pH 2.5
with H3P04
temperature
- 50"C
H20
adjuated
to pH
2.5 with
H3P04


.005 M
NH4H2P04
adjuated
to pH 2.5
with H3P04


.05 H
NH4H2P04
adjusted
to pH 2.5
with H3P04
temperature
- 10«C
.05 H
NaH2P04
adjuated
to pH 2.5
with H3P04


.05 H
sodium
perchlorata
adjuated to
pH 2.5 with
perchloric
acid
.05 M
NH4H2P04
adjuated
to pH 2.5
with H3P04
3 meter
column
.05 M NH
adjuated
2.5 with
«H2P04
to pH
«3POA
10Z acctonltrlla
3 meter


column


       36. SHPAC        1.4-10.5
           derlvatlzed
           urine
       37. SNPA blank   1.7-13.0
Ol
      Hyphenated valuea represent one large peak beginning and ending at  the  Indicated valuea.

      bND - not detected

      CSSPA • N-aucclnimldyl P-nltrophenylacetate (Regis Chemical Co.)

      dOnly 6 peaks observed In chromatogram of mixture of 11 compounda (8.  14, 16. 29. and 21-27) using 0.2 M NH4H2F04 (pH - 3.3) eluant.

-------
        TABLE 16.  REPRODUCIBILITY OF RETENTION POSITIONS FOR SEVERAL NITROGENOUS  COMPOUNDS  ON  ZIPAX SCX
                       USING AN ELUANT OF .05 M NHPO  ADJUSTED TO pH 2.5 with HO
Ul
00
replicate retention positions (ml)
compound
uracil
indole
tyroslne •
purine
guanlne
cytosine
adenlne
creatinine
tryptophan
a b c d e

1.9 - 1.9 -
5.3 5.1 5.4 5.6 5.5
5.9 5.6 6.0 6.2 6.0
10.3 10.2 10.6 10.9 10.7
12.2 11.9 12.7 13.2 12.8
15.0 15.0 15.1 15.7 15.1
29.2 27.3 29.7 31.3 29.7
f g h


5.3 5.4 5.4
5.9 5.9 5.8
10.5 10.3 10.7
- 12.4 12.3
15.3 14.8 14.7
- 29.2 28.2
mean
(ml)

1.9
5.4
5.9
10.5
12.5
15.1
29.2
absolute
standard
deviation
(ml)
- 0.04
0.12
0.15
0.17
0.24
0.43
0.31
1.26
percent
standard
deviation
3.08
2.73
2.78
2.88
2.29
3.44
2.05
4.32

-------
compounds.  Increased retention and subsequent resolution of some compounds
in this group was achieved, however, on the Zorbax C8 column.

     The reproducibilities of retention positions for several compounds are
shown in Table 16.  Although the absolute standard deviations were somewhat
greater for slowly eluting compounds, the percentage standard deviations for
these substances were not appreciably larger than for rapidly eluting
materials.  Absolute standard deviations ranged from 0.04 for a compound
eluting at a mean position of 1.3 ml, to 1.26 for a compound eluting at a
mean position of 29.2 ml.  The corresponding percentage standard deviations
for these two substances, however, were 3.08 and 4.32 respectively.  Thus,
while the absolute standard deviations varied by about 32-fold, the range in
percentage standard deviation varied by a factor of about 1.4.

     Injection of a mixture containing eleven compounds using a Zorbax CN
column and .005 M paired ion exchange reagent mobile phase with or without
20% methanol (Table 17) produced only nine and six chromatographic peaks,
respectively, suggesting that resolution was favored on the Zipax SCX column.
The small number of peaks observed using the mobile phase without methanol was
attributable to incomplete elution of the compounds by this weaker eluant.
Elution and perhaps resolution of all the injected compounds might have been
achieved by incremently increasing the methanol content of the mobile phase
using a gradient making device.  The large volume of mobile phase required to
elute the most retentive compound from the column, illustrated the lack of
rapid and clear resolution of constituent compounds using isocratic elution methods.

    TABLE 17.  RETENTION VALUES (ML) OF A MIXTURE CONTAINING 11 N-ORGANIC
        COMPOUNDSa ON ZORBAX CN USING PAIRED ION CHROMATOGRAPHY (PIC)
elution position
                                *7 * ******     -005  1  B  l hePtane
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
2.7
3.1
4.0
5.0
6.8
16.3
32.0
157.0
161.1
2.9
3.2
4.1
6.2
8.3
26.6
no further peaks observed
after elution with addi-
tional 242 ml mobile phase
                  no further peaks observed
                  after elution with additional
                  108 ml mobile phase
 uracil,  indole,  alanine,  tyrosine,  purine,  guanine, creatinine, cytosine,
 adenine,  creatine,  tryptophan;   elution order of these compounds was not
 determined.
                                     59

-------
     Tables 18 to 20 indicate  the operating conditions for the resolution of
18 different nitrogenous compounds by isocratic elution technique.  Resolu-
tion of all these compounds  is not feasible using any one column and mobile
phase but can be obtained from the chromatographic conditions shown in Table
20.  Zorbax C8 proved to be  very useful in separating a number of compounds
which were unresolvable on the Zipax SCX column.  Different retention
characteristics were achieved by varying the pH of the buffered eluant.  In-
creasing methanol content decreased the retentivity of compounds on the
Zorbax C8 column.  The strong retentivity observed for indole, using a small
percentage of methanol in the eluant, suggested that gradient elution would
facilitate resolution of mixtures of compounds within more reasonable periods
of time.
                 0

     Several chromatograms are included in Appendix B (Figures B-l to B-4) to
illustrate the varying adsorptivities of 11 compounds at three different wave-
lengths (220 nm, 233 nm, and 254 nm).  The chromatograms also illustrate the
phenomenon of peak spreading characteristic of isocratic elution techniques.

     Maximum sensitivity was achieved on the U.V. monitor at an attenuation
setting of 0.01 A.U.  At this sensitivity setting, a full scale peak on the
potentiometric chart recorder was equal to  1x10~2  absorbance units.  The
minimum detectable concentration of a trace compound was defined as the value
which resulted in a peak height equal to 5% of a full scale deflection at the
0.01 A.U. sensitivity setting.  Minimum detectable concentrations of nitro-
genous compounds were then calculated according to the equation:

              Minimum detectable concentration     ._ x -,Q-^\
              at 0.01 A.U. attenuation setting  =	              (9)
                         (moles/L)

where  E  is equal to the molear extinction value of a particular compound and
the path length of the U.V.  detector is equal  to one cm.  Minimum detectable
concentrations for some nitrogenous organic compounds are shown in Table 21.
Sensitivity settings of 2.0  or 1.0 A.U. were used when concentrated field and
laboratory samples were analyzed, to minimize  the number of response peaks
going off the scale of the potentiometric recorder.  Minimum detectable con-
centrations of nitrogenous materials monitored at these two settings were
2 x io2  and  ixio2, respectively greater than those reported in Table 21.

     Table A-37 (in Appendix A) illustrates the changing elution position of
creatine with increasing concentration, attributable to column overloading.
It is interesting to note that the creatine overloading did not effect the
retention characteristics of other compounds introduced simultaneously in-
dicating that saturation was occurring only at selected sites on the resin.

Later Studies:  Gradient Elution—
     A programmable gradient device was acquired later in this study to
improve the resolution of concentrated field samples and to permit the
separation of compounds having a wide range of polarities.  Mixtures of
reference compounds were not satisfactorily separated on either a Durrum DC
1-A resin using a pH 3, 0.2  M  citrate buffer to 0.1 M citrate buffer (adjusted
to pH 9.0 with NaOH) 20 minute, x3  gradient, or an an Aminex A-27 column


                                      60

-------
TABLE 18.  RETENTION VALUES (ML) OF NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS ON ZORBAX C8 WITH CITRIC ACID BUFFER ELUANT
Mobile phase
100Z.OS M 201 MeOH; 501 MeOH; 301 ace to- 100Z 0.1 M 75Z HeOH; 100Z SOZ MeOH; 100Z .OS
pH 2.5 BOX .05 H SOZ .05 M nltrlle 70Z pH 2.5 25Z .05 N .05 M SOZ .05 M pH 3.9
buffer pH 2.S pH 2.S 0.1 M pH 2.5 buffer pH 2.5 pH 2.0 pH 2.0 buffer
Compound buffer buffer buffer buffer buffer buffer
•. taurlne
NDb
b. t-hydroxyprollne ND ND
c. Indole
d. creatlnlne
e. t-nspartic acid
f. l-histldine
g. dl-serine
h. glyclne
1. barb 1 curie acid
J. guanlne
k. cytoslne
1. uracll
n. uric acid
n. succlnlmlde
o. tyrosine
p. adenlne
q. 5-chlorouracll
r. alanlne
a. purlne
t. Chymine
u. pyrrole
v. tryptophan
ND 47 & 52 13 & 14 34
ND ND
ND ND
ND
ND
ND ND
3.1 2.2
3.8
3.3
3.5
3.8
4.2 3.0
5.8
5.3
6.4

7.1
9.6 3.6
11.8 6.0 8.1
35.0
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
4.9 & 5.1 12.9
2.7
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND
ND ND ND ND




4.5
4.7


5.8 7.3
11.4
12.0
8.8 7.8 3.4 8.4
12.8 11.3 4.8 8.9

M SOZ HeOH;
SOZ 1.0 M
pH 3.9
buffer
ND
ND


ND
ND
ND
ND










3.15
3.0
5.0

                                                                            (continued)

-------
                                                 TABLE 18 (continued)
Compound
100X .05 M
pH 2.5
buffer
20Z MeOH;
80Z .05 M
pH 2.5
buffer
50Z MeOH;
SOX .05 M
pH 2.5
buffer
Mobile phase
30Z aceto- 100Z 0.1 M
nltrile 70Z pH 2.5
0.1 M pH 2.5 buffer
buffer
75Z MeOH;
25Z .05 M
pH 2.5
buffer
1001 •
.05 M
pH 2.0
buffer
50Z MeOH;
50Z .05 M
pH 2.0
buffer
100Z .05 M
pH 3.9
buffer
50Z McOR;
50Z 1.0 M
pH 3.9
buffer
 Mixture
 1. m, n, q, t, & u   IT
 Raw Marlboro       3.0 S 5.3
 West pre-          NFC 150
 chlorinated
 secondary
 sewage
 effluent

 Marlboro West       2.8
 XAD filtered       HP - 100
 prechlorinated
 secondary
 sewage
 effluent
?H  - all components resolved
CND - none detected
 NF - no further peaks observed  after volume Indicated

-------
        TABLE 19.  RETENTION VALUES (ML) OF NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS ON ZORBAX C8 WITH HIGHER pH BUFFER ELUANTS
Ul
50% MeOH: 50% 100% .05 M 100% .01 M 50% MeOH; 50% 100% PH
0.2 M pH 6.9 PO, pH 6.9 PO, pH 6.9 pH 8.9 borax 8.9 borax
compound buffer buffer PO^ buffer buffer buffer
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
£.
g.
h.
i.
J.
k.
1.
m.
n.
o.
P.
taurine
£-hydroxyproline
indole
creatinlne
l-aspartic acid
l-histldlne
d£-serine
glycine
barbituric acid
guanine
cytosine
uracil
uric acid
succinimide
tyros ine
adenine
NDb
ND
15.9
2.8
ND
ND
ND
ND




ND
2.8


ND ND
ND ND
265 14.5 & 15.2
4.4 4.9 2.65 4.1
ND ND
2.6 2.6
2.7 2.7
ND ND
3.4 2.4
5.6 2.6 5.3
3.8 4.5 3.5
3.7 2.6 3.8
ND
5.1 3.3 4.1
4.5 4.4
15.4 14.5
                                                                                    (continued)

-------
TABLE 19 (continued)
50% MeOH; 50%
0.2 M pH 6.9 PO,
compound buffer
q. 5-chlorouracil 2.9
r . alanine
s . purine
t . thymine 2 . 9
u. pyrrole 5.1
v. tryptophan 3.5
u, p, v, & t
Marlboro West
pre C\2 2° sewage
effluent XAD filtered;
concentrated x 200
a
R « resolved
b
ND = not detected
100% .05 M 100% .01 M 50% MeOH; 50%
pH 6.9 P04 pH 6.9 pH 8.9 borax
buffer P04 buffer buffer
2.03
2.6 2.6
11.6
8.7 3.2
11.8 5.2
23.1
Ra

One elution
peak 1.5-8.0 ml


100% pH
8.9 borax
buffer
3.8

8.5
8.8
11.7
22.0





-------
TABLE 20.  COMPOUNDS RESOLVABLE8 ON ZIPAX SCX OR ZORBAX C-8
Zorbax C8
Zipax SCX pH 2.5 citric
compound .05 NH4H2P04 acid buffer
taurine
i-hydroxyproline
indole
creatinine
fc-aspartic acid
fc-histidine
dfc-serine
glycine
barbituric acid
guanine
cytosine
uracil
succinimide
tyro sine
adenine
5-chlorouracil
alanine
purine
thymine
pyrrole
tryptophan
creatine
1
1
2
10
1
1
1
1
1
6
8
1
1
4
9
1
3
5
1
1
11
7
a Numbers indicate elution order.
resolvable for conditions shown.
b
ND = not detectable

NDb
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
4
4
5
6
7
8
—
Compounds

Zorbax C8 Zorbax C8
pH 6.9 phos- pH 8.9 borax
phate buffer buffer
ND
ND
11
3
ND
1
1
ND
2
5
2
2
5
4
9
1
1
7
6
8
10
-
having same

ND
ND
10
4
ND
1
1
ND
1
5
2
2
4
4
9
3
-
6
6
7
8
-
number are un-

                            65

-------
    TABLE  21.   MINIMUM DETECTABLE CONCENTRATIONS OF SOME NITROGENOUS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS'
compound
cytoslne

creatlnlne

Indole
creatine
creatine

creatine
uracil

uracil
alanlne
tryptophan

adenlne
succinimlde

5-chlorouracll

pyrimidine

purlne
wavelength
254

254

254
254
233

210
254

233
254
278

256
215

272

242

260
mean Eb
3.921 x 103
3
1.074 x 10J
3
3.905 x 10J
2.610 x 101
1.454 x 102
3
2.365 x 10
7.779 x 103
3
2.215 x 10 J
2.70 x 10'1
6.559 x 103
*
1.388 x 10
3.999 x 102
•)
8.183 x 10
•»
2.564 x 10J
•>
7.603 x 10 J
standard
deviation
1.423 x 103

319

261
_
_

431
275

26
_
384

279
56

395

129

193
minimum detectable
concentration (MDC)
moles /L mg/L
1.26 x 10~7
_7
4.66 x 10
_7
1.28 x 10 '
1.92 x 10"5
3.44 x 10~6
_7
2.11 x 10 '
6.43 x 10"8
_7
2.27 x 10 '
1.83 x 10~3
7.62 x 10"8
-8
3.60 x 10 °
1.25 x 10"6
-8
6.11 x 10 °
_7
1.95 x 10 '
-R
6.58 x 10
9.57 x 10"3
_2
5.27 x 10
_2
1.50 x 10
2.51
4.51 x 10"1
_2
2.77 x 10
7.21 x 10"3
_2
2.53 x 10
165.0
1.56 x 10~2
_3
4.87 x 10
1.24 x 10"1
-3
8.95 x 10 J
_2
1.56 x 10
_3
7.80 x 10 J
"Peak height of 5 chart units at 0.01 A.U. attenuation setting

llolar extinction values calculated from the mean values of standard
 compounds dissolved In ammonia-free water (pH unadjusted; see Table
solutions of nitrogenous
A-24).

-------
 using a 0.01 to 1.0 M ammonium-acetate-acetic acid buffer (pH=4.4) gradient.
 Use of the Zorbax CN column with a pH 5.0, citrate buffer to 50% methanol,
 20 minute gradient, resulted in the separation of eight compounds from a
 mixture of eleven materials.  All eight resolved peaks, however, eluted
 rapidly and prior to the methanol phase of the gradient.  Elution of a mix-
 ture of ten compounds (uracil, indole,  pyrimidine, sarcosine, tyrosine, crea-
 tinine, cytosine, adenine,  guanine, and tryptophan)  on Zipax SCX (1 meter)
 using 0.01 M sodium perchlorate adjusted to pH 2.5 with perchloric acid
 eluant for 19 minutes followed by initiation of a 10 minute x5 gradient to
 1.0 M of the buffer, resulted in resolution of only seven of the compounds.
 Better resolution of this mixture was obtained using the Zipax SCX column
 with NHnHaPOi, instead of the sodium perchlorate salt.
      Successful  separations  of  mixtures of reference compounds were obtained
 on either  the Zorbax C-8 or  the Zipax SCX column using the chromatographic
 conditions shown in Tables 22 and  23  and Figures 12 and 13.   The Zorbax C-8
 column exhibited greater selectivity  for these compounds than did the Zipax
 SCX column.   The C-8 column  was therefore used most frequently in analyzing
 concentrated  field  samples.

 TABLE 22.   ELUTION  POSITIONS3 (MINUTES)  OF REFERENCE NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS ON
                                   ZIPAX SCX


                      0.01-1.0 M  sodium            0.01-1.0 M NHi»H2POi,
                      perchlorate  adjusted          adjusted  to pH 2.5 with
                      to pH  2.5 with  perchloric     H3POi»;  20 minute x2
 Compound              acid;  10  minute,  x5 gradient   gradient
5-chlorouracil
indole
tyrosine
guanine
adenine
trptophan
uracil
alanine
purine
creatine
cytosine
creatinine
1.1
1.5
7.2
7.3
8.6
25.9
—
-
—
—
—
_

2.3
4.9
7.9
10.0
13.1
1.8
4.0
6.7
8.1
10.2
in.fi
 Values represent mean retention times.
     After several weeks, the Zorbax C-8 column (column  'a') began exhibiting
peak aberations.  This was later attributed to dissolution of the silica
support in the analytical column, and the accumulation of colloidal or part-
iculate material in the mobile phase or injected samples at the inlet of the
chromatographic column.  A new C-8 column (column 'b') was therefore obtained
from the manufacturer.  Although this replacement initially resulted in
                                     67

-------
00
                                                                              I mi 1.0. • I.I •»


                                                                      I. 401 IWM: 10 •!• •' «.,JI.«I
1-MitUlM WO •«,
c,i..l~ 10 ../I
crr.ll.lM 10 .,/L
,»..l~ W .£/(

tkr»C>. M .«/!.
                                                                  	,j • tfttffcri ••rllillMi • 1*0 ••(
                                                                  !."• • »IO ~. •n.lil.Uit • »0.0« I..... - t.l «A)[J- J|J^"JJ" " J|JJ
                                                                 >li>rti MO'C                     II. IM..I, «o ,,/L
                                                      l*r U V i.«c.
                 Figure 12.    Chromatogram of  a mixture of  12  nitrogenous  compounds resolved  on Zorbax C8
                                 with  a 0.05  M phosphate  buffer  (pH  = 6.9)  to 50% MeOH;  10 minute, X5 gradient

-------
                                                                                                    ,it, - O.I
                                                                                fl-or..c.«. *.t.f(o,- r.cii.tlu. - MO M; Mta.UM
                                                                                 • 70 —. ..~m.HT - ».01 (,„,. . o.J U)
                                                                                   :  I4M p.i
                                       I           I           I
                                       II           »          !•
                                      Ei-lloo tlm. (mlnul.. I lo. UV tiM«
Figure 13.   Chromatogram of a  mixture  of 12 nitrogenous  compounds resolved on Zorbax C-8 with a 0.05 M
              borate buffer (pH-8.9) to  50* MeOH,  20 minute, X5 gradient.

-------
TABLE 23.  ELUTION POSITIONS (MINUTES) OF REFERENCE NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS ON
  ZORBAX C8 COLUMN "a", USING  .05 M PHOSPHATE BUFFER (pH = 6.9) TO 50% MeOH,
                           10 MINUTE, x5 GRADIENT
elution position6
compound
elution time (minutes)
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
3
3
3
4
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
10
11
11
12
urea
alanine
barbituric acid
creatine
uric acid
proline
fc-histidine
cytosine
uracil
tyrosine
succinimide
creatinine
guanine
5-chlorouracial
thymine
pyrrole
purine
tryptophan
adenine
pyrimidine
fc-hydroxyproline
indole
1.0
1.7
1.8
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.7
3.5
3.5
3.5
3.8
3.9
5.2
6.2
8.4
9.3
11.7
12.9
13.1
14.2
16.0
23.9
 Numbers indicate elution order.  Compounds having same number are unresol-
 vable for conditions shown.  Values  represent mean retention time.
separations similar to  those attained on the original C-8 column (Table 24),
loss in column retentivity was  later observed after passage of about 20 to
50 ml of phosphate buffer through  the column.  Purine, for example, eluted
more than twice as fast after the  column had been in contact with about 30 ml
of phosphate buffer in  comparison  to when  the column was used immediately
after it had been regenerated with metHanoi and reequilibrated with phosphate
buffer.  This occurrence was attributed to rapid bonding of trace contaminants
in the  phosphate buffer onto adsorption sites in the analytical column.

     Loss of retentivity on the Zorbax C-8 column was observed to occur more
slowly using a 0.05 M borate buffered eluant to 50% methanol gradient
(Figure 13).  Loss of retentivity  was observed under these conditions only
after several hundred milliliters  of borate buffer had been eluted through
the analytical column.  This occurrence was again attributed to bonding of
trace contaminants in the buffer onto adsorption sites of the chromatographic
resin.  Column retentivity was  restored by regeneration with methanol.
                                      70

-------
TABLE 24.  ELUTION POSITIONS3 (MINUTES) OF REFERENCE NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS ON
  ZORBAX C8, COLUMN "b", USING A .05 M PHOSPHATE BUFFER (pH=6.9) TO 50% MeOH,
                            10 MINUTE, x5 GRADIENT


elution position        compound                  elution time (minutes)
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
barbituric acid
£-histidine
cytosine
creatinine
guanine
5-chlorouracil
thymine
pyrrole
purine
adenine
pyrimidine
indole
2.0
2.0
3.2
3.8
6.2
7.9
9.8
12.6
13.0
13.8
15.5
37.4
 Values represent mean retention times.

 Numbers indicate elution order.  Compounds having same numbers are unresol-
 vable for conditions shown.
     With the exception of 5-chlorouracil, all of the reference compounds
eluted in the same order using the borate buffered eluant (Table 25) as pre-
viously observed using the phosphate buffered mobile phase (Table 24).
Thirteen compounds were resolved under these conditions.  Most of the amino
acids, however, were not strongly retained on the chromatographic column.

     An unidentified chromatographic peak, eluting from about 27-30 minutes
was observed in chromatograms of the mixture of reference compounds resolved
on Zorbax C-8 using the borate buffered eluant (Figure 13).  This was attri-
buted to desorption by the methanol, of trace contaminants in the buffer which
had been retained on the column during the first phase of the gradient.

     A chromatogram of the ultraviolet and fluorescamine derivatized fluor-
escence traces obtained without injection of a sample is shown in Figure 14.
The contaminant peak just discussed again appeared in the chromatogram during
the methanol phase of the gradient.  The fluorescence baseline remained quite
flat during the buffer phase of the gradient but then increased by about 10%
increasing methanol eluant composition.  This was attributed to a correspond-
ing pressure drop of about 56 to 50 p.s.i. in the post column lines.  No base-
line change was observed, however, in an underivatized fluorescence trace,
obtained without injection of a sample, at a sensitivity setting two times
greater than that used in monitoring the derivatized fluorescence baseline.
                                      71

-------
TABLE 25.  ELUTION POSITIONS3 (MINUTES) OF REFERENCE NITROGENOUS COMPOUNS ON
 ZORBAX C8, COLUMN "b", USING A .05 M BORATE BUFFER (pH 8.9) TO 50% MeOH,
                           20 MINUTE, x5 GRADIENT
elution position
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
4
4
4
5
6
7
8
8
9
10
10
11
12
13
compound
aspartic acid
glycine
glutamic acid
serine
barbituric acid
thioruea
glycylglycine
proline
lysine
valine
il-histidine
succinimide
tyrosine
cytosine
leucine
uracil
5-chlorouracil
creatinine
guanine
thymine
pyrrole
phenylalanine
purine
adenine
tryptophan
pyrimidine
indole
skatole
elution time ' (minutes)
1.5
1.8
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.5
2.6
2.7
2.8
3.4
3.7
3.7
4.3
4.1
4.3
4.6
6.3
10.5
14.4
14.2
15.5 '
21.1
21.0
23.0
46.3
67.5
3Values represent mean retention  times.
 Numbers  indicate elution order.   Compounds  having  same numbers are unresol-
 vable for  conditions  shown.
                                      72

-------
                         i  •> uaplxl lnrod.,.4 IMC,
                         Mchltilt: Xorfcai i:«
                         4la0Ml«M! l««*th • 2) rm: l.n. • 2.1 M
                         plwMt .OV1 barm. buff.r (p* • •••) to Ut MOI; » •>•»•. »
                         «Hott
                         lreter: «av,.|.-««ll. . |n w •miitvlfy . 1.0
                             vlwtor: vmcicallua • no ••: WIM|M • 410 M:
                          >lil>lt. . 40.07 (rnur . 0.: Ut)
                         r: two p»l
                       l*w ratv) kvfrrr • 1.1 •!/•!•
                      Ourl •(••irft I r«/«m
                          .t Fl«nr.*i-<.l».
                         Mltoc 
                                •
 Figure 14.
^^^''^""''""""""""'"""^•""^'"'"'""'"'""""T™"^"1™""""""1™!?"'"™™1""111^""'""^^""""
        •HIM. HM 0-lMln) I0> IIMMICMC*  UK*

 Chromatogram of  U.V. and fluorescamine-derivatized fluorescence
   traces obtained without injection of  a sample.
      The Zorbax C-8  'b1  column began exhibiting peak aberation after being
used for only several  days.   The analytical  life of this column,  using the
borate buffered eluant,  was  shorter than  that  of the Zorbax C-8  'a'  column,
using phosphate buffered eluant.  This was attributed to the more rapid
dissolution of the silica support in the  column using the more alkaline
mobile phase.

      Another replacement column (column 'c') was therefore obtained  from the
manufacturer and used  with a guard column.   The guard column prevented fouling
of  the analytical column by  sample or mobile phase contaminants.   In addition,
the  silica-containing  guard  column presaturated the mobile phase  with dis-
solved silica, thereby decreasing the rate of  silica dissolution  in  the ana-
lytical column.  The guard column consisted  of a 4.6 i.d. by 5 cm stainless
steel tube packed with permaphase ODS (DuPont  Co.)  and fitted with a 20 urn
inlet frit and 2 ym outlet frit.  Elution positions for some reference nitro-
genous compounds on the  Zorbax C-8 'c'  column  using a 0.05 M borate  buffer
(pH-8.9)  to 50% methanol, twenty minute,  x5 gradient and the 5 cm permaphase
guard column are shown in Table 26.   With the  exception of purine  all of the
reference  compounds exhibited  the same  retention times using the borate buffer
with  the guard column  (Table  26) as  previously observed without the  guard
column (Table 25) .   Purine eluted slightly more rapidly using the  guard
column and the new Zorbax C-8  column, and was  therefore not resolvable from
pyrrole.   The guard column did not appear to decrease the overall  separation
efficiency to any observable extent.
                                       73

-------
TABLE  26.  ELUTION POSITIONS3  (MINUTES) OF REFERENCE NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS ON
 ZORBAX C8 COLUMN "c", USING A .05 M BORATE BUFFER  (pH 8.9) TO 50% MeOH, 20
          MINUTE x5 GRADIENT (USING A 5 cm PERMAPHASE GUARD COLUMN)


elution position        column                 elution time  (minutes)
1
2
3
4
4
5
6
7
8
8
9
10
11
barbituric acid
£-histidine
cytosine
5-chlorouracil
uracil
creatinine
guanine
thymine
pyrrole
purine
ader.ine
tryptophan
pyrimidine
2.3
3.3
3.9
4.2
4.3
4.9
6.5
10.7
14.0
14.0
21.6
22.5
23.8 . .
a
 Values represent mean retention times.

 Numbers indicate elution order.  Compounds having same numbers are unresol-
 vable for conditions shown.
     Ultraviolet spectra of reference nitrogenous compounds were recorded
after correction for the background spectrum of 50% methanol in water, the
flow cell and photomultiplier, using the memory module.  Figures 15 and 16
show the uncorrected and corrected spectra, respectively, of 50% methanol in
water.  Figures 17 to 30 and 31 to 56 show the corrected spectra of reference
nitrogenous compounds eluted through Zorbax C-8 using a 0.05 M phosphate
buffer (pH = 6.9) to 50% methanol, 10 minute, x5 gradient and a 0.05 M sodium
borate buffer (pH = 8.9 with H3P04) to 50% methanol, 20 minute, x5 gradient,
respectively.  Neither of the two buffers had significant absorbance at wave-
lengths greater than about 225 nm for the signal attenuation used in the
spectral scans (Figures 57 and 58).  End absorbance at wavelengths less than
225 nm for compounds eluting in the buffer phase of the gradient program was
partially attributable to absorbance by the buffer.  Most of the reference
nitrogenous compounds exhibited the same U.V. spectra in the phosphate buffer
as in the borate buffer.  Shifts in the positions of maximum and minimum
absorbancies attributable to the different buffers were noted, however, for
purine, succinimide, tyrosine, and 5-chlorouracil.  Spectral data for some of
the reference compounds are summarized in Table 27.
                                      74

-------
^F-


I
I
    aso
 aoo
Wavelength
                                                               200
                                   (nm)
               Figure 15.  50% methanol uncorrected  signal.
                                     75

-------
I
t
s
I
      •so
 i
300
280
200
                        Wtoratength (nm)


              Figure 16.   50% methanol corrected signal.
                                  76

-------
t

e
w
      360
       360


Wavelength  (nm)
        Figure 17.  Acenine  (in 0.05 M phosphate buffer)
                                 77

-------
o
^
9


I



t


e
w
4
       380
300
                                  (nm
2SO
                                        2OO
           Figure 18.   5-chlorouracil  (in phosphate buffer).
                                   78

-------
350
                    300
                                        2 SO
                                                           200
                           (nm)
     Figure 19.  Creatinine (in 0.05 M phosphate buffer).
                              79

-------
t
e
>
    360
    300
WavaUngth  (nm)
250
                                                                200
         Figure 20.  Cytosine  (in 0.05 M phosphate  buffer)
                                  80

-------
V

e
t

P
8
4
                            300

                  Wavelength  (nm)
1ST
         Figure  21.  Guanine  (in 0.05 M phosphate buffer)
                                81

-------
w

!
t
p
                         360
2*0
                   200
                              (nm)
         Figure 22. Indole (in 0.05 M phosphate buffer).
                                 82

-------

t
p
w
4
                             300
                       Wavelength  (nm)
2OO
          Figure 23.  Purine (in 0.05 M phosphate buffer)
                                  83

-------
*


*
t
p
w
4
    960
                          300

                    Wav«l*ngth  (nm)
—T
 200
          Figure 24.   Pyrimidine (in 0.05 M phosphate  buffer)
                                  84

-------
I
I
t

e
u
4
3*60
                           TOO

                     Wavelength  (nm)
200
         Figure 25.   Pyrrole (in 0.05 M phosphate buffer)
                                  85

-------
o
t
p
e
    350
   300
Wavelength (nm)
                                             250
                                                                 200
         Figure 26.  Succinimide (in 0.05 M phosphate buffer).
                                 86

-------
a
n
t
I
     3*0
      300
Wavalcngth  (nm)
                                                                  200
           Figure 27.   Thymine  (in  0.05 M phosphate buffer).
                                   87

-------
I


8
p
w
     990
  300

Wavalcngth (nm)
                                             250
                                                                 200
           Figure  28.   Tryptophan (in 0.05 M phosphate buffer).
                                    88

-------
I
A
t
e
c
4
   1ST
   300
Wavelength (nm)
260
200
          Figure  29.   Tyrosine (in 0.05 M phosphate buffer)
                                 89

-------
I
e
A
t
      35O                  300                  25O

                         Wav«l*ngth  (nm )

            Figure 30.   Uracil  (in  0.05 M phosphate buffer)
2OO
                                     90

-------
350
                    300
                  W»v« length   (nm)
250
                   200
   Figure 31.  Adenine (in 0.05 M borate buffer)
                            91

-------

t
e
4
      950
300
                                         (nm)
                                              290
                                                                 200
          Figure  32.   Barbituric Acid (in 0.05 M borate buffer).
                                  92

-------
^

^
I
t
4
                       300

                     Vfewtongth   (nm)
200
          Figure 33.  5-chlorouracil (in borate buffer)
                                 93

-------
a
A
t
«*
e


I
       950
                           300


                         W«v«l«ngth  (nm)
280
200
          Figure  34.   Creatinine (in 0.05  M borate buffer)
                                  94

-------
t
e
g
4
     350
 300

Wavelength  (nm)
                                             280
200
            Figure 35.  Cytoslne  (in  0.05  M borate buffer)
                                    95

-------
t


2
9
4
        3SO
 I  "
aoo
 i
280
 I
200
                          Wavelength  (nm)
           Figure 36.   D-glutamic acid (in 0.05 M borate buffer).
                                  96

-------
3
n
t
4
      350
300                 250
   WavcUngth  (nm)
                                                                2OO
         Figure 37.   DL-phenylalanine (in 0.05 M borate buffer).
                                  97

-------
350
300                 250
 Wav*l«ngth  (nm)
                                                           200
     Figure 38.   DL-serine (in 0.05 M borate buffer).
                            98

-------
>

•
e
t

p
b
                               I

                              300
280
200
                               W«v«Un0th  
-------
I

•
a
A




t
O

5

>
    ,
      aao
   3OO

Wavelength (rnn)
                                               280
                                                                  2OO
          Figure  40.   Glycine (in 0.05 M borate buffer)
                                  100

-------
>

•
n
t
I
        350
                             300
                              Wavelength   (tint)
 •
25O
                    200
            Figure 41.  Glycylglycine (in 0.05 M borate buffer).
                                    101

-------
|
      380
 300
W«v«l*ngth
                                              2SO
200
                                      nm
         Figure 42.  Guanine  (in  0.05  M borate buffer)
                                 102

-------
>
V

o
•I

II
9
n






t

o
4
        •
       350
3OO
 I
250
200
                             W«v«l«ngth (nm)
    Figure 43.  L-(+)-Aspartic Acid (in 0.05 M borate buffer)
                                   103

-------
               aoo
               Wavelength (nm|
280
                                                      abo
Figure 44.  L-(-)-Histidine (in 0.05 M borate buffer)
                       104

-------
t
o
b
P
4
      350
  I                   I
 300                  250
Wav«ltngth  iron)
200
        Figure 45.  L-(+)-Lysine (in 0.05 M borate buffer)
                                 105

-------
t
o
S>
4
       35O
                          300

                       Wav*l«ngth (nm)
                                              2SO
200
        Figure  46.   L-(-)-Proline (in 0.05 M borate buffer).
                                  106

-------
or
•

^
9


\
\

2
»
>



4
     aoo
300                 290

 Wav« length  (nm)
                                                                 200
  Figure  47.   3-methylindole (skatole)  (in 0.05 M borate buffer)
                                 107

-------
>
V
•
o
•
t

e
^
gi
         360
     300

Wavelength  (nm)
290
                                                                     200
           Figure 48.  Purine  (in 0.05 M borate buffer)
                                   108

-------
»
I
£
I
                        W«**Mngth (MM)
                                                        200
            Figure 49.   Pyrimidine (in 0.05 M borate buffer)
                                   109

-------
or
t
e
8
4
                        300
 I
250
20O
                           Wavelength   (nm)
            Figure 50.  Pyrrole  (in 0.05 M borate buffer)


                                   110

-------
>
cr
a
o
t
o
I
       350
                            300
250
200
                         Wavelength  (nm)
            Figure 51.   Succinimide (in 0.05 M borate  buffer)



                                   111

-------
>
o-

o
a
1


o

g
       350
300                 250

 Wavelength   (nm)
                                                                  ZOO
           Figure  52.   Thiourea (in 0.05  M borate buffer)
                                   112

-------
9

e
a
A
t



O
•

01
I
    350
                          300

                         Wavelength  (nm)
250
200
           Figure 53.   Thymine (in 0.05 M borate buffer)
                                 113

-------
I
o
t

p
8
  300

Wavelength  (nm)
                                           250
"T"
 200
         Figure 54.   Tryptophan (in 0.05 M borate buffer)
                                114

-------
          MO             • 280
             Wmclmgth (MM}
Figure 55.  Tyrosine (in 0.05 M borate buffer)
                       115

-------
                   300
             Wavelength     (nm)
280
                   200
Figure 56.  Uracil  (in 0.05 M borate buffer)
                       116

-------
350
   300
Wavelength  (nm)
                                        250
                                                            2OO
    Figure 57.  .05 M phosphate  buffer,  pH = 6.9.
                           117

-------
8
t
e
*
 4
    aso
aoo
                                            280
                                                               200
     Figure 58.  .05 M sodium borate  adjusted to pH 8.9 with H-PO,.
                                  118

-------
TABLE 27.  SPECTRAL DATA FOR SOME REFERENCE NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS
position of maximum position of minimi
absorbance (nm)a absorbance (nm)
compound
adenine
barbituric acid
5-chlorouracil
creatinine
cytosine
guanine
fc-histidine
purine
pyrimidine
pyrrole
succinlraide
thymine
tryptophan
.05 M
phosphate
buffer
260
-
276
234
267
276 & 250
-
265
242
flat
239
265
279
.05 M
borate
buffer
260
257
293
233
266
272 & 243
293
268
240
flat
211
265
276
.05 M
phosphate
buffer
227
-
240
217
247
259 263
-
223
218
flat
232
233
243
.05 M
borate
buffer
229
230
248
215
248
& 228
249
233
219
flat
205
235
243
absorbance
im
absorbance
.05 M
phosphate
buffer
4.9
-
3.3
1.6
1.4
-

4.9
4.4
-
5.0
3.3
2.7
max
min
.05 M
borate
buffer
4.0
4.8
3.6
1.5
1.4
-
3.2
4.0
2.9
-
1.07
2.9
3.0
absorbance
absorbance
.05 M
phosphate
buffer
1.4
1.2
2.9
0.7
1.3
1.3
1.7
0.8
0.4
5.1
1.9
2.2
6.0
at 220 nm
at 233 nm
.05 M
borate
buffer
1.3
1.7
1.7
0.8
1.3
1.4
1.7
2.4
2.1
-
-
2.3
7.1
                                                            (continued)

-------
                                    TABLE 27 (continued)
               position of maximum  position of minimum  absorbance
               absorbance (nm)
absorbance (nm)
                                                                   max
                                                         absorbance
                                                                    .
                                                                   min
absorbance at 220 nm


absrobance at 233 nm


compound
tyrosine
uracil
indole
.05 M
phosphate
buffer
276 & 222
259
273 & 217
.05 M
borate
buffer
276 & 222
259
'
.05 M
phosphate
buffer
245
228
240
.05 M •
borate
buffer
260
229
"
.05 M
phosphate
buffer
7.2
4.0
3.7
.05 M
borate
buffer
10.3
2.9
"
.05 M
phosphate
buffer
1.6
1.3
8.4
.05 M
borate
buffer
2.3
1.3

^Underlined values were used in computation of absorbance ratio.

-------
Chromatographic Resolution of Concentrated Natural Samples

Isocratic Elution With U.V. Detection Only—
     Chromatograms of concentrated Charles River (Appendix B, Figure B-5),
early Concord River (Appendix B, Figure B-6),  and Merrimack River (Appendix B,
Figure B-7) water samples all contained only large peak eluting rapidly from
the Zipax SCX and Zorbax C-8 columns, and occasionally smaller secondary
peaks.  No distinct peaks characteristic of identifiable nitrogenous compounds
were detected.  Both Kjeldahl-N (Table 28) and fluorometric analyses (Appendix
B, Figures B-8 and B-9) of aliquots taken from the chromatographic column
after injection of concentrated field samples, however, indicated the presence
of nitrogenous organic compounds beyond the initial large elution peak.  The
approximate mass of Kjeldahl-N in each aliquot was calculated from the product
of the Kjeldahl-N value (mg/L) and the volume analyzed (liters).  These data
showed that approximately 82% of the nitrogen content of the eluting nitro-
genous compounds was found in the first 10 ml of the chromatographic effluent.
Some of the higher Kjeldahl-N values occurred in aliquots having corresponding
large U.V. absorption.  Kjeldahl-N recovieries in other aliquots, however,
were observed in low U.V. absorbant portions.   Kjeldahl-N values of resolved
individual N-organic compounds were probably obscured by the relatively large
volume of aliquot required for analysis.

     Resolution of some 15 distinct peaks from a concentrated primary sewage
effluent collected at Marlboro East sewage treatment facility was achieved
using Zorbax C-8 with citric acid, phosphate,  and borate buffered eluants of
increasing methanol composition.  Peak identification was not pursued because
of the inability reproducibly to regulate increasing mobile phase strength
with the isocratic pump.  Separation of this concentrated sample using Zorbax
CN (1-octanesulfonic acid eluant), Zipax SCX (NHi»H2POi»; pH 2.5 eluant) and
Aminex A-27 (sodium acetate-acetic acid buffer; pH 4.4 eluant) resulted in
the resolution of only 5, 5, and 4 peaks, respectively.  Gradient elution
would most likely have resulted in improved resolutions.

     The ability to resolve several complex mixtures on Zipax SCX using
NHi»H2POi, (pH 2.5) eluant was also investigated.  Urine samples were resolved
into six U.V. detectable (233 nm) constituent peaks while urochrome con-
stituents in urine and in secondary sewage effluent were resolved into only
two large peaks in each case.

Gradient Elution with U.V. and Fluorescence Detection—
     The gradient device significantly improved the chromatographic analysis
of concentrated field samples over conventional isocratic elution.  Chromato-
grams of concentrated samples resolved on the Zorbax C-8 column using the
phosphate to methanol, or borate to methanol gradient elution operating
conditions, displayed from 1, to over 40 distinct and reproducible peaks.
The Zorbax C-8 column exhibited greater selectivity over the Zipax SCX column
and was therefore used exclusively in analyzing the concentrated samples.
Nitrogenous compounds in 8 of the 12 samples concentrated by the low temper-
ature distillation-lyophilization method were characterized  (Figures 59 to
82).
                                     121

-------
      TABLE 28.   NITROGEN VALUES  IN ALIQUOTS  TAKEN  FROM  THE  CHROMATOGRAPHIC EFFLUENT OF  ZIPAX SCX AFTER
                INJECTION OF CONCENTRATED (200  FOLD) MARLBORO WEST POST  CHLORINATED EFFLUENT
to
IS)

sample
aliquot
(ml)
0-2
2-4
4-8
8-10

10-12
12-14
14-18
0.05 ml
concentrated
sample

volume
analyzed
(ml)
1
1
2
1

1
1
2
.05



b
KJeldahl-N
(tng/L)
7.7
1.2
2.8
4.7

0.9
1.6
0.9
354


approximate mass
of Kjeldahl-N in
volume analyzed0
(mg)
0.77 x 10"2
0.12 x 10~2
0.55 x 10~2
0.47 x 10~2
-2
0.09 x 10
0.16 x 10"2
0.18 x 10"2
1.77 x 10"2




percent Kjeldahl-N
in aliquot
33
5
24
20

4
7
8
-


       ^Volume analyzed • 1/2 sample aliquot volume.  Aliquots were divided equally for separate NH3 and
        Kjeldahl-N analysis.
       3Kjeldahl-N = organic-N since NH3-N = 0
       =Mass Kjeldahl-N = concentration of Kjeldahl-N (mg/L) x volume analyzed (liters)

-------
ho

OJ
                                             flwllen IIm« Iw UV tree* |Mny|«B)
                                                                                                             -r-
                                                                                                              60
      Figure 59.   Chromatogram of  raw concentrated Middleton  Pond sample (7/11/78), phosphate buffered eluant,

                  with fluorescaraine  derivatized fluorescence.

-------
                                                                    V) »l HlMUto* PM4. BMVW*. NA 
-------
co
                                                                              «-»!.. • .1 MMUU. N*. tan... m (,-, . MM.
                                                                              C.1— nctl.,, «—»«. C-i
                                                                                (ringt • 0.1 t*A)

                                                                                    *VO Ml

                                                                              »l«i i.t«; bu(f., . l.l BI/.U) lMi/w.t«r • 0.

                                                                                     *JO*C

                                                                              Ch*rl •(>•»<)( 1 CB/Ml«
                                                   M Mm. (HlnlMl Iw U« III
     Figure 61.   Chromatogram  of raw  concentrated Middleton Pond  sample  (7/11/78), borate buffered  eluant,
                   with underivatized fluorescence.

-------
                                                                   . l-II-It)
to
                                IMlo W .l| »Ut\*tm »••*. •—..... Ill In. I. Mil. ,.4, I
                                            c-l
                                                m i.». • t.i •
                                Mrtiu pi»Mi  .CM »»•!• k»rr« (f» i.t) >• m man N
                                O.f . 4«tB«r«rl *«v«Un«tfc • 110 M| MMlllVltf - 1-0
                                     - 0.1
                                 *MMT«l 1430 »•!

                                   r.l.l »<•»« - 1.) .1/.1.I WOl/MUr - OH •!/•!•
      Figure 62.   Chromatogram  of resin-filtered,  concentrated Middleton Pond sample (7/11/78),  borate
                    buffered  eluant, with fluorescamine  derivatized  fluorescence.

-------
                                                . • (iota Itlun*. • MM, l-u->«)
                                          > I] _i I. >.*>.! •
                                    .OM k.,.t. k.Il.r (f»4.t) t. Ml
                            t.f . 4*l«cl*n IMMlMftk - 110 »| •MMtllvltf • 2. ft
                            n»»Mc«K> <« MO BM oKilx • 4M Ml »—ilil.li, . M.M
                                                              IB
                                                         u V lr*c«
                                     ffhill«> tlM«  (M4n
Figure 63.   Chromatogram of  resin-filtered,  concentrated  Middleton Pond sample  (7/11/78), borate
              buffered  eluant,  with  underivatized fluorescence.

-------
to
CC
                                                     M .Li CMMN llm. IIIUclu, M  ».<>.l.llk -!»•,, uultlvtl, • l.t

                                               ""HI'"'! !"""" """""• • "• *' -'••'•• • «» -I .~l.i.lr, - M.M

                                               Pr«»ur»i  MX) MI

                                                io. otii kuff.r * 1.1 .!/.!.< IMI/mur - O.TJ «!/.!.
                                               I««f«r«tur«i xlO'C

                                                           !•

                                                                                .r. lliiin.ilii 1.
                                                     tlMM«n 11m* 
-------
M
                                                    l«Wl>:  W ill
                                                                  llmi. Illlrrl... M (. — . • IOM. I-4-II)
                                                    CeliM 4lBM*l«Bii iMfttli - 21 r«| l.». • 1.1 w
                                                    IMIU f*-".: .OM fcor... W-rr.f   .. HI IMMt M «lMt«
                                                    V.V. 4«t*ct*ri  w«**lra|tli - 1X0 mn MMlilvlty • l.t

                                                     (r*n|« O.I iiA)
                                                    PTMawrci 14V) Ml
                                                    riov >.t.i fc.ff.r - 1.) . I/.1-, H^M/M*« • O.I) .1/.|.
                                                                      tlMM (MIAWf**)  f«f UV  !>•<•
                                                                    llm> IOIKX.. )
                                                                                                   M
                      Figure  65.   Chromatogram of raw  Concord River sample  (7/4/78), borate  buffered
                                      eluant,  with underivatized  fluorescence.

-------
H
OJ
O
                                               Ua»)Ui  JO til UD-t/TaoM flltarad Concord ll*ar. Illlarlca. HA
                                                   (*-»-7»). •«*>!• cooc.ntr.l.d 2.000 fold
                                               ColuaM packlD|l  Zorbax C-8
                                               Coliim dlamnalona:  laagth - 2) »t I.D. • 2.1 •»
                                               Hobila phaaat .05* boratc buffar (pH 8.9) to 501 rhOH; JO alnu...
                                                   i5 gradlant
                                               D.V. datKtori ««vrlength - 220 n»; acnattt*!ty - 2.0
                                               CoaBjenti:  fluoresc&alne and boratc buffar latroducad bafora fl
                                                   to Monitor derlvatlzad primary aftlna coapounda
                                                                                                                                      10
                                                   Elullon  lima  (mlmilai)  for U.V  Iraca
                                                        1O                15                20
                                                Elullon  Urn*   (mlnulaa I  for  tluotaacanca  Iraca
                                                                                                              J5
                                                                                                                                30
             Figure  66.    Chromatogram  of  resin-filtered  Concord  River  sample  (6/8/78),  borate  buffered  eluant,
                              with  fluorescamine derivatized  fluorescence.

-------
                                                        "D-"T""" f"""<" Cohort llnr. llll.rlc.. HA
                                                       , •*•?!• conccntratad J.OOO fold
                                             Column poking:  lort.. C-8

                                                    Moilon.:  l«,,th - 1J cm; l.D. - 2.1 „
                                             Mobil. ph«.:  .Oi« bor.t. buffet (pH S.9)  to SOX tMH;  W .lou
                                                 •  Rr»dleat

                                             U.». d.t.ctor:  i<>vcl.n«th - JZO t... .m.uivlt; • 1.0
                                                  cenu d.tector:  nclt.tlon - )90 n.; ral.iloi -  470
                                                 •riulclvlty - 37.01 (r.ng. . 0.2 UA)
                                                  t«:  buff.r - I.J •!/.!„; M.UH/H 0 - 0.73 ml/mix
                                                  fur*-  "v^O"/*               *
                                                  P«d:  1 <••/•! n
                                                  • :  undrt iv.tdrd fluoroetDci
         I
         to                 **
glutton  tim»  (minutai) for  U.V.   trace
                                                                                           10
                                                                                                                               30
                                                  10                 IS                 20
                                         Elullon  llm*  (mlnulci)  lor  fluor««c.nc«  lr«c«
                                                                                                       25
Figure  67.    Chromatogram  of  resin-filtered  Concord River  sample  (6/9/78) ,  borate buffered  eluant,

                 with  underivatized  fluorescence.

-------
OJ
ro
                                  ta^Ul  SO Hi rmi OicllUtorll (twit ••»!«. e«K*»tral>4 l.fOO f°
                                  CO!M« Mckl«t> *«rb«m r-8
                                  &>!••• Jlaawloui  Iwmth > 35 oil I.D. - 1.1 **
                                  febtU pk«.«.  .0«1 bor.t. buffer  (pd - •.*) to 501 IMXIl M •!•«»
                                      i5 Ittiiml
                                  O.V. <«t.rror: «.v.l.r,tth • 110 >•! ».o.Itlvlti - 2.0
                                  Fluor««c«ne« 4*(ccror: •xcitatton - MO M; wtHlMi • 470 ••{
                                      •mcitlvlty - 55.01 (r«n|« - 0.2 gA)
                                  Pr««iurc:  14V) pfl
                                  riou r>»:  kufftr - 1.1 .1 .lo; lto<*/H2O - 0.7) ml I ml a
                                                                  fiver««c*nc«
                                                                   IS               20
                                                               Hut Ion  llm« (mlnul.i)  for U V   tract
                                                              If               10
                                                        Clvllon llm« (mlnut«t) tor  'l
                                                                                                               10
       Figure  68.    Chromatogram of  raw filtrate from a  culture  of  Oscillatoria  tenuis,  borate  buffered
                        eluant, with fluorescamine  derivatized  fluorescence.

-------
H
LO
      Figure 69.   Chromatogram of raw filtrate from a culture of Oscillatoria tenuis, borate buffered

                  eluant, with underivatized fluorescence.

-------
                                  I— pU.  JO 111 UD-I/TXMI filtered O.clll.torl« tenul. u^ple.
                                      concentrated 1.610 fold
                                  ColMn packlnft  Zorba* C-8
                                  Colon dlaeulonit  lenfth - 2S cm; 1.0. - 2.1 —
                                  Mofcll. ph.M:  .OSN boriti buffer (pH - 8.9) to V)I HrOH; 20 .lour.
                                  U.V. 4>
                                  fh.rt
                                        *ctor:  wcv*l«ngth - 220 am: •rnfltlvtty • 2.0
                                        ence detector:  excitation - 190 am', eaieeloa • 470 na»:
                                      a* altlvlty - 16.01 (ran|e - 0.2 uA)
                                           USO pel
                                           buffer - 1.1 »l/»l»; HeOH/H2O - 0.71 ml/mlm
                                        art:  ->.20'C
                                           fluorc«c«aln« and boratc buffer introduced before fluor
                                                 10                
-------
H
UJ
in
            p
            \
            ^
            J
            t
            I
                                          leiepUi  50 ul IAD-1/Tenu filtered O.ctlletorl. temjle mol*.
                                              concentrated 1.6)0 fold
                                          ColiMBn packing:  Zorba* C-fl
                                          Calnaa ilmfoMtont:  length * 1} CBI I.D. - I.I IB
                                          Mobil _ph..«:  .03M bor.t. buff.t  (pB - 8.9) to SOI NrfM; 20 .lout.

                                          U.V.
                                               terror:  wavelength - 220 «; aaiMttlvlty • 2.0
                                               niltlvltjr - 36.01 (txige - 0.2 uA)
                                               te:  butter - l.J .l/.ln. HcOH/HTO - 0.73 •!/•!•
                                                  underivettird fluoreecence
                                                        W                1*
                                                   tlutlon  llm«  fmlnulei)  (or  U.V.  lnc«
                                               10                IS                JO
                                              ElUllon  lime (mlnulei)   lor  'luoreicence tr«c«
       Figure  71.
Chromatogram  of  resin-filtered  filtrate  from  a culture of OsaillatoTia tenu~is,  borate
buffered eluant,  with underivatized fluorescence.

-------
cr-
                                                         Mil It •!••«• .'
                Figure 72.   Chromatogram of raw filtrate  from a culture of Anabaena flos aquae,
                            borate buffered eluant, with  fluorescamine derivatized fluorescence.

-------
OJ
                                        I.. M

                                        m MrkKl 1..%.. C-t

                                        MM 4IMMIMMI  iMflfc • t> Ml I.B. • 1.1 M

                                      M1U fluuc .OW koc«l« ».ff.r | •
                Figure 73.  Chromatogram of  raw filtrate from a culture of Andbaena flos aquae,
                             borate buffered  eluant, with underivatized fluorescence.

-------
OJ
00
                                                                   tm,\,i it >|| tmtitm OM •«••« ». 0 1«A
                                                                         , fcimwi  nclldlm - HO «.i ~l.il— - . ft a, MMIU.II> • tO.H
                                                                         - O.i
                                                                   rnnwrti
                                                                   flaw !•!•: K«tf.r <• 1.1 •(/•INI MaOM/Mtcf • O.M •!/•!•
                                                                   Ckiri .,.*,  I r./.i
                 Figure  74.   Chromatogram of resin-filtered filtrate from a  culture of  Andbaena  flos
                                aquae,  phosphate buffered eluant,  fluorescamine  derivatized fluorescence.

-------

      i
      ^
                                        teaplei  V) ul IAD-«/T«um filtered »«cheed«, on eeepl.. co»«etr« C-l
                                        Coluen dl.rn.10ni:   length > 25 c»; I.D. - 2.1 Mi
                                        Mobil* phe»:  .05 M borete buffer (p« - I.*) Co Ml HeOl; 10 Btnu,
                                              gradient
                                        U.V. detector: Mevelen|th • 220 im: ecnelclvlty - 0.4
                                             eence detector: ••cltetloo • MO am; ewleilo* • 470 ••;
                                              neltlylty - «0.OX (r
-------
                                                S«pl«:  50 ul UD-l/T«ftu (llt.rrd B.-.h..d.. OH >«^>lr. roocntr.t
                                                    2000 fold
                                                Coluon p.ctlng.  Zorb.i C-8
                                                Coluan di«rnilon«:  length - 2) <••; 1.0. • 2.1 n
                                                Hob II. ph».r  .OW bui.tf buff.r  (p« - t.t) to SOI ItKW; JO .lout.
                                                    *'* glfdtfnt
                                                U.V.  dcicrior: «v«len|th * 220 am; ••n.ltlvllr - 0.4
                                                Fluorv.ccnce d«c*ctor:  eiclt.clon • 390 rm; cvli.lon - 470
                                                     n.ltlvlty  • 40.01 (ranRC -  0.2 uA)
                                                     e:  UV) P.I
                                                     tt:  buffer - 1.) -I/.In. (VOH/HJO - 0.7) .l/.la
                                                       «:  -*.20"C
                                                       d:  1 r./.ln
                                                        underlv.t lied fluorc.renct
                                    1                 10                 It
                                        ((•lion  lim« (minulti)   lor   U-V.   trie*
                                                                  19                 10
                                      Elutlon  Urn*  (hilnulM )  lor   liuor.«c.nc.   Inc.
Figure  76.   Chromatogram  of  raw  surface impoundment  sample,  Bethesda,  Ohio,  borate  buffered  eluant,
                 with underivatized fluorescence.

-------
                                f**?le:  JO »1 UD-i/T«nn filtered Mlddletnn Pond enable  (p* un.id |u.t.d)
                                    *-21-7a, cuncrntratrd 2000 fold
                                Colum packing: Zorbai C-8
                                Coliaan dlienalona:  length • 25 cm; I.D. - 2.1 an
                                Mobile phaae:  .05* borate buffer (pH - 1.9) to SOt NaOH(  JO ejlnute.
                                    «5 gradient
                                U.V. detector: vavelrngth • 220 n«- ««n«ltl»lty - 2.0
                                Fluoreacence detector:  eicltatlon - J90 am; eailaalon - «70 na-
                                    aenaltlvlty - 36.01 (range - 0.2 nA)
                                Preaaure:   1450 pal
                                Ploii rate:  buffer -1.3 .]/.!„•  M«OH/H,0 . 0.71 •!/•!>
                                Teap'ralure:  i20*C
                                Chart apeed:  I i«/.ln
                                Coawnta:   riuorearailne and borate buffer Introduced before
                                    f luor
                                                 10 •
                                              Clutlon   lima
       IS                 X
fltilnulap  lor   U.V.  lrac«
                                          EluHon  urn*
                                                             IB
                                                        mlnul • •
                                                                                                                    30
                                                                  lor
Figure  77.   Chromatogram  of  resin-filtered  (pH  unadjusted)  Middleton Pond  sample  (6/21/78),  borate
                 buffered  eluant,  with  fluorescamine derivatized  fluorescence.

-------
                                              •:  V> pi UD-*/Teiui» filtered NlddUtcm Pond ..„. 1,   r-8
                                           Tnlmn dluniloiu:  length - 2S ,-«; I.D. - 2.1 IB
                                           Mobil* ph«.«:  .OiH borne buffer (pH - ».») to SOI NeOH;  20 »lnul«,
                                              »' iridlenc
                                           U.V. detector:  vnelen|th - 220 n., >en>ltlvlty - 2.0
                                           Pluore.cenc. detector:  e,cit.tlon . 1,0 «; »i..lo» - 470 n.;
                                              •entltlvlty • J4.0I (ran(e - 0.2
                                           Preiture:  14V) pal
                                           Plou rite:  buffer - 1.1 .l/.ln: KeOH/H20 - 0.73 .l/.In
                                           Tevperature: %20'C
                                           Ctiirt (peed: 1 cm/mln
                                                   underlvit lied fluorescence
                                                         tlullen   II m«  (mlnutel)  tor  U.V.   Itece.
                                                10                IS                 30
                                                     C lulled  Urn*  (jnlnulaO  far  fluoxscenc*  lr»e«
                                                                                                       25
Figure  78.   Chromatogram  of  resin-filtered  (pH  unadjusted)  Middleton Pond sample  (6/21/78),  borate
                 buffered  eluant,  with underivatized fluorescence.

-------
                                                                                 1.0), MlddlatM road .je»la
       M Hi lAB-t/raau fllt.rW (at
          ), c«tc*«trat>d 2000 fold
Calaan F.<-kln,i  lorkaa C-l
Co I nan dleameloaal  length - IS e*| I.D. - 1.1 ••
Itoblla ahaaa:  .OM karat* kaffar (•« - t.t) to 501 NrCM; JO •!•
    *5 gradient
U.V. detector:  « r
      • :  buCIrr - 1.3 «l/.lo. HrW/HjO - 0.7] mlfmim
      art:  ^ZO'C
      •cd:  1 cm/min
         float fmctmlnt and bor.i. buffer titrod»e«d >«for*
                       lury aailnc colpounde.
                                                               Cklltan   urn*  (mlnulaa)  for  U.V.  trace
                                                                                                                           T
                                                                <5            .20                »
                                                            Eklllon    tin*  (mlnul«»)    for   lluor«ac«nc«  tract
Figure  79.   Chromatogram  of  resin-filtered  (at  pH= 2),  Middleton  Pond  sample  (6/21/78), borate
                 buffered  eluant,  with  fluorescamine derivatized  fluorescence.

-------
                                       •aaail.i  90 ill IAB-l/Teui  fllt.r.d (.c pH - 2.0). Nlddleton Pood l
                                           (6-21-76), coac.iit rated 2000 (old
                                       Colueai p*ckln«:  Zorbai C-B
                                       Colian dlBenaloa*!  length - 25 cm; I.D. • 2.1 an
                                       Nobtle phaae:  .05H borttt buff*r 'pH - 6.9) to 50J IMM; 20 limit*;
                                           • gradient
                                       U.V. dcttctot: Mvclrnith - 220 r,.. Multlvltr • 2.0
                                       Pluorcicrncr detector:  rx
-------
Figure 81.  Chromatogram of resin-filtered Merrimack River sample (6/14/78), borate buffered eluant,
            with fluorescamine derivatized fluorescence.

-------
               n
         ILJ
                         •«*l.< M nl lAD-ifr— rilurvd fer Match •!»•» .«.*!• (*-l4_7lf
                            co«r*mtr.tH 2000 t»l4

                         Col*m 41a.M*loa*i  laagik • 19 cmi 1.0. • 1.1 ••
                         -to*iU_.A»*«;  .OM bor.f. k.fUr  to Wl IWM| 20 tilMt*.

                                       i * 120 MI MMlclvltr • 2.0
                                 *t*cteri ncltatloa • WO em; *«ia«la* • *ft M«I
                                                  t«f  U V.  H«c«
Figure  82.   Chromatogram of  resin-filtered Merrimack River sample (6/14/78),  borate buffered  eluant,
               with underivatized  fluorescence.

-------
     Identification of unknown resolved chromatographic peaks was achieved by
comparison of retention position and U.V.  data with those of reference
compounds.  U.V. data were obtained by stopped-flow spectral scanning of in-
dividual chromatographic peaks.  It was found, however, that the retention
positions for some compounds were effected by the stopped-flow analytical
method.  For example, after scanning cytosine using the stopped flow tech-
nique, it was found that thymine eluted only 2.5 minutes after resumption of
mobile phase flow through the Zorbax C-8 column 'a' using the phosphate to
methanol gradient.  With continuous eluant flow, thymine eluted 4.5 minutes
after cytosine.  The shorter elution time of thymine, observed in the separa-
tion where the mobile phase had been temporarily stopped, indicated that this
compound probably continued to diffuse through the column while the eluant
was static.  Pyrrole, on the other hand, was eluted the same amount of time
after thymine, with or without stopping of the mobile phase during the chroma-
tographic run.  Positions of unknown chromatographic peaks could therefore be
unambiguously related to those of reference materials only in that portion of
the chromatogram obtained prior to and including the first stopped-flow
spectral scan of an eluting material.  Stopped-flow spectral scanning of un-
known compounds eluting at positions of reference materials was therefore
done only one time for each chromatographic run.

     The principal information used in comparing U.V. spectra of unknown
materials with those of reference compounds was the positions of maxima and
minima U.V. absorbance, and ratios of maximum to minimum U.V. absorbance and
absorbance at 220 nm to 233 run.  U.V. spectra of materials isolated from
concentrated field samples are shown in Figures 83 to 109.  A summary of the
information taken from these spectra for use in the identification of these
materials is shown in Table 29.

     The sample taken at Middleton Pond, Danvers, MA (7/11/78) was analyzed
using both the borate and phosphate buffer to methanol gradients on the first
Zorbax C-8 column (column 'a').  The probability that the chromatographic
peaks were correctly identified in this sample increased because of the
corroborative retention data and U.V. spectra obtained using the two different
operating conditions.  Unfortunately, loss in retentivity on replacement
Zorbax C-8 columns using phosphate buffer as the mobile phase, precluded the
use of this eluant in obtaining corroborative information on other samples.

     Absorbance ratio values of sample to reference compound equal to 1 re-
presented a perfect correlation of the unknown compound to the reference
material.  Values above or below 1 were attributable to increased or decreased
absorbance in the unknown material arising from the presence of coeluting
compounds.

     Table 30 lists the samples which did not result in identifiable chroma-
tographic peaks,  In some cases only one large unresolved group of compounds,
rapidly eluting from the column, was observed.  Other chromatograms contained
distinct peaks which did not coincide with the retention positions of any of
the reference nitrogenous compounds  (Figures 75 to 82).
                                     147

-------
  «c



  >
  V
  m
  e
  a
  n
           350
    300

Wav«l*ngth  (nm)
                                                     250
Figure 83.  Middleton Pond, Danvers, MA (raw; x 1,000; 7-11-78). Phosphate

            buffered eluant, suspected compound: uracil.
                                     148

-------
   9
   e
                              300
                           Wav*l«ngth  (ran)
                                                  250
Figure 84.  Middleton Pond, Danvers,  MA (raw;  x 1,000;  7-11-78).   Phosphate
            buffered eluant, suspected compound:  5-chlorouracil.
                                    149

-------
   E
   or
   •
   o
   o
             350
                     3OO

                  Wavelength  (ntn)
                                                     250
Figure 85.
Middleton Pond, Danvers,  MA (raw;  x 1,000; 7-11-78).  Phosphate

buffered eluant, suspected  compound:  thymine.
                                     150

-------
   <

   II
   9
   •
   e
   ^
   9


   n
             350
      3OO
Wavelength (nm)
 I
25O
Figure 86.  Middleton Pond,  Danvers,  MA (raw;  x 1,000;  7-11-78).   Phosphate

            buffered eluant, suspected compound:   adenine.
                                    151

-------
c
je

0)
•
e
a
o
                            300                  25O                200
                             Wavelength   (nm )
           Middleton Pond, Danvers, MA (raw; x 1,000; 7-11-78).  Phosphate
           buffered eluant, suspected compound:  purine.
        350

Figure 87.
                                    152

-------
   c

   jc



   9
   •
   e
   ^
   er
       380
300
                     250
 I

2OO
                            Wavelength  (nm)
Figure 88.  Middleton Pond, Danvers, MA (raw;  x 1,000;  7-11-78)

            buffered eluant, suspected compound:  uracil.
                                     Borate
                                    153

-------
    V
    •
    e
    •*
    o-
            350
      300

Wavelength  (nm)
2 SO
Figure 89.  Middleton Pond, Danvers, MA (raw; x 1,000; 7-11-78)

            buffered eluant, suspected compound:  thymine.
                                      Borate
                                    154

-------
    9


    e
    •4

    V




    n
            350
3OO
                                                       250
                              Wav«l*ngth  (nm
Figure 90.  Middleton Pond, Danvers, MA (raw; x 1,000;  7-11-78)

            buffered eluant, suspected compound:  adenine.
                                 Borate
                                     155

-------
    c
    je
    e
    ^
    a
    •
    9
            3 SO
300
                                                       250
                                Wavelength  (nm )
Figure 91.  Middleton Pond, Danvers, MA (raw; x 1,000; 7-11-78)

            buffered eluant, suspected compound:  purine.
                                Borate
                                    156

-------
    o-

    e
    ^
    o-
    a
    9
    n
                              300

                            Wavelength
            250
(nm)
Figure 92.  Middleton Pond, Danvers, MA (resin filtered; x 1,000; 7-11-78)

            Borate buffered eluant, suspected compound:  guanine.
                                    157

-------
     «<
     e
     •*
     cr
                             300                 250
                              Wavelength  (nm)
200
Figure 93.  Middleton Pond, Danvers, MA  (resin filtered; x  1,000;  7-11-78)
            Borate buffered eluant, suspected compound:  thymine.
                                    158

-------
           350
                                3OO
                            Wavelength  (nm)
250
Figure 94.  Middleton Pond, Danvers, MA (resin filtered; x 1,000; 7-11-78)
            Borate buffered eluant, suspected compound:  uracil.
                                    159

-------
 e
 •*
 a
 3
 O
         350
                              300
                            Wavelength  (nm)
250
                    200
Figure 95.  Concord River, Billerica, MA (resin filtered, x 2,000, 6-9-78)
            Borate buffered eluant, suspected compound:  guanine.
                                    160

-------
  e
  •»
  v
  •
         350
                              300

                         W«v«l*ngth  (nm)
250
Figure 96.  Concord River,  Billerica,  MA (resin filtered;  x 1,000;  7-4-78)

            Borate buffered eluant,  suspected compound:   uracil.
                                   161

-------
  cr
  t>
  3
  n
     350
300                  250
   Wavelength  (nm)
200
Figure 97.  Concord River, Billerica, MA (resin filtered; x 1,000; 7-4-78)

            Borate buffered eluant, suspected compound:  guanine.
                                    162

-------
  a-
  o>
  e
  n
  0
        350
                              300
                            Wavelength  (nm)
Figure 98.  Concord River, Billerica, MA (resin filtered; x 1,000; 7-4-78)

            Borate buffered eluant, suspected compound:  adenine.



                                    163

-------
   a
   •
   o
   ^
   a
   a
   r>
         350
  300
Wavelength
250
                                          (nm )
Figure 99.  Anabaena flos aquae (resin filtered; x 1,615).  Phosphate
            buffered eluant, suspected compound:  cytosine.

                                    164

-------
       350
Figure 100.
             Wavelength   (nm )

Anabaena flos aquae (resin filtered;  x 1,615)
buffered eluant, suspected compound:   uracil.
Phosphate
                                   165

-------
   o-
   •
   o
   ^
   V
   01
   3
   O
         360
       300
Wavelength  (nm)
                                                      250
Figure 101.  Anabaena flos aquae (resin filtered;  x 1,615).   Phosphate
             buffered eluant, suspected compound:   5-chlorouracil.


                                    166

-------
  B
  9
  O
       350
                300
                         Wavelength  (nm)
                                                   250
Figure 102.
Anabaena flos aquae (resin filtered; x 1,615).
buffered eluant, suspected compound:  pyrrole.
                                    167
Phosphate

-------
 a»

 «
 e
 3
 n
       I
      350
Figure 103.
                300
           Wavelength  (nm)
 I
2SO
Andbaena flos aquae (resin filtered;  x 1,615).   Phosphate
buffered eluant, suspected compound:   tryptophan.


                       168

-------
    9

    e
    ^
    v
    •
    a
    n
           350
  300
Wavelength
                                                  250
200
                                       (nm )
Figure 104.  Andbaena flos aquae  (resin  filtered;  x 1,615).

             buffered eluant, suspected  compound:   thymine.
                                  Phosphate
                                     169

-------
 c
 5

 |
 e
       350
300
                          W«v«l«ngih   (nm)
                    250
                                                                  200
Figure 105.  Anabaena flos aquae  (raw;  x 1,750).
             suspected compound:   tyrosine.
                                     170
                        Borate buffered eluant,

-------
         350
                 3OO
Figure 106.
             Wavelength  (nm)

Andbaena flos aquae  (raw; x 1,750)
suspected compound:  uracil.
                                                   250
Borate buffered eluant,
                                    171

-------
 0-
 •
 e
      .
         aao
       3OO
Wavelength  (nm
                                                      250
Figure 107.   Osaillatoria tenuis  (resin  filtered; x 1,630)
             eluant,  suspected compound:   adenine.
                                   Borate buffered
                                    172

-------
 c
 '<
 e
  9
  A
        350
300
                           Wavelengt h    CnitO
250
Figure 108.  Osaillatoria tenuis (resin filtered; x 1,630)

             eluant, suspected compound:  purine.
                               Borate buffered
                                    173

-------
   tt
   V
   «
   o
   t»
   3
   n
         3 SO
3OO
2 SO
                             Wavelength   (nm)
Figure 109.   Osoillatoria  tennis  (raw; x  1,860)

             suspected  compound:  uracil.
                   Borate buffered eluant,
                                    174

-------
TABLE 29.  U.V. ADSORBANCE DATA FOR COMPOUNDS RESOLVED ON ZORBAX C8 USING 0.05 M PHOSPHATE
                     OR .05 M BORATE BUFFERED ELUANT TO MeOH GRADIENTS

I.






la.




II.



III.


suspected compound
similarity similarity . c
to reference to reference peak
Xpeak ""PO"^3 *trough compound Atrough
Mlddleton Pond, Danvera, MA, raw, 7/11/78
uracil
5-chlorouracll
thymlne
adenine
adenine
purlne
Mlddleton Pond, Danvers,
uracll
thymtne
adenine
purlne
Mlddleton Pond, Danvera,
guanlne
thymlne
uracil
Middleton Pond, Danvera,
cytoalne
adenine
260 444b
273 444
261 444
262 444
256 444
267 444
MA. raw. 7/11/78
256 444
261 444
260 444
261 44
(phosphate buffered
231
250
230
232
232
245
eluant)
444
4
444
444
444
0

1.30
1.57
-
2.11
-
1.58
/A eflk v C
* trough'aample
* trough'reference

0.33
0.48
-
0.43
-
0.32
A220C
A233 (

0.87
1.48
1.55
1.86
1.61
-
'A220\C
lA233'aample
'A220\
kA233^reference

0.67
0.52
0.70
1.29
1.12
-
(borate buffered eluant)
234
231
247
230
MA. resin filtered. 7/11/78 (borate
276 & 250 444
260 444
253 44
MA, entralnment
263 444
260 44+
263 & 230
230
227
444
444
0
444
1.60
3.0
—
2.36
0.55
1.03
—
0.56
1.24
1.14
—
1.0
0.95
0.50
-
0.42
buffered eluant)
444
444
444
precipitation method, 7/11/78
247
230
444
444
-
2.87
1.7
(phoaphate
1.07
1.88
-
0.99
0.59
buffered eluant)
0.77
0.58
0.92
1.67
1.3

1.83
1.52
0.66
0.73
0.97

1.36
1.05
                                                                         (continued)

-------
                                       TABLE  29 (continued)



•uapected compound

W

similarity similarity
to reference to reference
compound * trough COBP°un«'
/Ape.k \ C /A220\ C
^trough 'sample „ ^A233'samDle
Apeak c
trough
IV. Concord River. Blllerlca, MA, resin filtered. 6/9/78 (borate buffered eluant)
guanlne 272 & 241 +++ 264 & 231 -H-+
V. Concord River. Billerlca, MA. resin filtered, 7/4/78 (borate buffered eluant)
uracil 257 -»-H- 243 -H-f 1.15
guanlne 279 & 249 +++ 262 & 227 -H-f
adenine 262 -H-f 252 0
VI.






VII.


VIII.


IX.




(Vak \ A220
^At rougher aference A233
0.36
1.15
1.70
1.92
2.02
fA220\
^A233/referenM
0.82
1.31
1.36
1.56
Anabaena flos aquae, reain filtered (phosphate buffered eluant)
cytoslne
uracil
5-chlorouracll
pyrrole
tryptophan
thymine
Anabaena floa aquae.
tyroslne
uracil
Osclllatoria tenuis.
adenine
purlne
Osclllatoria tenula.
uracil
a see Table 27
b
++* - + 5 ra
268
257
272
flat
273
266
raw (borata
272
260
•H-f 250 ++4-
•H-f 229 4-H-
•H-f 243 -H-f
- .
•H- 256 0
•H+ 239 ++
buffered eluant)
•H-f 260 0
•H-f 233 -ff*
1.13
3.21
1.10
_
1.07
1.36

—
2.33
0.81
0.79
0.33
_
0.40
0.41

—
0.80
2.33
1.52
1.85

2.04
2.12

2.27
2.04
1.73
1.19
0.64

0.33
0.97

0.99
1.57
realn filtered, x 1630 (borate buffered eluant)
259
271
raw, x 1860
- 256



•H-f 245 0
•H-f 242 +
(borate buffered eluant)
•H+ 237 -f



_
1.82

1.29



_
0.46

0.44



2.03
1.79

2.33



1.56
0.74

1.79



    ++ - ± 7 nm



     •f - + 10 nn



     0 •



CA - absorbance value at wavelength shown

-------
          TABLE 30.  SAMPLES RESULTING IN EITHER POORLY RESOLVED
                   OR UNIDENTIFIABLE CHROMATOGRAPHIC PEAKS
I.  Samples concentrated by low temperature distillation followed by lyo-
    philization:

    1.  Surface impoundment, Bethesda, Ohio (resin-filtered)

    2.  Middleton Pond, Danvers, MA, 6/21/78 (resin-filtered at both pH 2.0
        and pH 7.0)

    3.  Merrimack River, Lawrence, MA, 6/14/78 (resin-filtered)
     All of the samples exhibited a large unresolved group of compounds
rapidly eluting from the column.  A corresponding fluorescamine-fluorescence
peak was frequently observed.  Underivatized fluorescence for this rapidly
eluting group of compounds was substantially less than the corresponding
derivatized fluorescence indicating the presence of primary amine compounds
in the concentrated samples.  The total concentration of this group of
compounds was later calculated to be greater than about an equivalent of
40 mg/L of glycine.  Retention data of reference amino acid compounds (Table
25) additionally suggested that this rapidly eluting group of compounds may
have consisted of primary amine materials.

     The chromatograms display both a U.V. and fluorescence trace for most
samples.  The U.V. ordinate is in absorbance units.  A full scale reading is
equal to the sensitivity value reported in each chromatogram.  The fluor-
escence ordinate is calibrated by both a sensitivity and range setting.
Fluorescence settings equal to a sensitivity of 40.0% and 45.0% and a range
of 0.2 for each, resulted in a full scale reading for 36 mg/L and 12 mg/L
fluorescamine derivatized glycine, respectively.  Every 10% increase in the
sensitivity setting approximately doubled the fluorometric sensitivity.

     The recording pens for the U.V. and fluorescence traces are displaced
from each other by 1.3 cm as indicated on the abscissa of the chromatograms.
Corresponding U.V. and fluorescence peaks are separated by only 1.2 cm
because of the lag between the U.V. and fluorescence detectors.

     Chromatograms of raw and resin-filtered samples are included for most
sites.  The same compounds were identified at some sites in both the raw and
resin-filtered samples, while other compounds were observed in only one of
the differently treated samples.  No significant improvement in the chroma-
tographic baseline was observed for any of the resin-filtered samples.

     Table 31 shows the concentrations of organic nitrogen compounds identi-
fied in the concentrated field and laboratory samples.  Concentrations were
calculated from peak heights of known concentrations of reference compounds
according to the equation:


                                    177

-------
             TABLE 31.   CONCENTRATIONS OF ORGANIC NITROGEN COMPOUNDS IDENTIFIED IN CONCENTRATED FIELD
                                           AND LABORATORY SAMPLES3
oo
Mlddleton
Pondb,
Danvers,
MA (raw)
Compound 7/11/78
adenlne 860 (445)
5-chlorouracll 60 (11)
cytosine
guanlne
purlne 200 (93)
pyrrole
thymlne 240 (S3)
tryptophan
tyros Ine
uracll 250 (62)
organic nitro- .
gen (pg N/L) 21.7 x 1(T
Z of organic 3.1
nitrogen identi-
fied In sample
Mlddleton
PomP,
Danvers,
MA (resin
filtered)
7/11/78


190 (88)


90 (20)


170 (42)
21.3 x 103
0.7
Pond b,
Danvers, MA
(entralnment
precipitation
method
7/11/78
90 (46)
20 (8)







—

Concord
River
Blllerlca,
MA (resin
filtered)
6/9/78


140 (64)






0.34 x 103
18.8
Concord
River,
Blllerlca Anobaena
MA (raw) jloA aqu&e.
7/4/78 (raw)
150 (77)

170(79)




340 (26)
60 (15) 100 (25)
1.84 x 103 2.24 x 103
9.3 2.3
Anobaena OidLUatoiua.
j£o4 aquae OtcAJUatoiua, temuA
(resin leniLU (resin
filtered) (raw) filtered)
40 (21)
10 (2)
40 (16)

40 (19)
160 (33)
40 (9)
30 (4)

80 (20) 20 (5)
1.60 x 103 1.78 x 103 1.31 x 103
6.2 0.2 3.1
          Values  out  of  parentheses Indicate compound concentrations as ug/L
          Values  in parentheses  are calculated  organic  nitrogen  concentrations  (as  pg N/L)
          Sampled during  the  occurrence  of blue-green algal  bloom

-------
concentration
 of  suspected
  compound
 peak height  of
 suspected  com-
 pound at 220 run
(in chart units)
    absorbance units
       chart unit
    absorbance units
    at 220 nm per
    mg/L reference
                                                            compound
                                                                          (10)
Absorbance values (220 nm) per mg/L of reference compound for materials
separated using either the phosphate or borate buffered eluant are shown in
Tables 32 (see page 180) and 33, respectively.


   TABLE 33.  VALUES FOR CONVERTING PEAK HEIGHTS OF NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS
   RESOLVED ON ZORBAX C8 TO CONCENTRATION IN mg/L (BORATE BUFFERED ELUANT)
Compound
  concentration
      (mg/L)
absorbance at 220 nm
 (absorbance units)
absorbance at 220 nm
per mg/L of compound
(absorbance units)3
barbituric acid
£-histidine
cytosine
5-chlorouracil
uracil
creatinine
guanine
thymine
pyrrole
purine
adeine
tryptophan
pyrimidine
tyrosine
20
610
15
60
10
10
50
75
100
75
100
50
40
20
0.150
0.230
0.100
0.700
0.060
0.140
0.086
0.280
0.090
0.230
0.170
0.220
0.250
0.056
.0075
.0004
.0067
.0117
.0060
.0140
.0017
.0037
.0009
.0031
.0017
, .0044
.0063
.0028
^Absorbance at 220 nm per mg/L of compound
                              [absorbance at 220 nm/concen-
                               tration of compound (mg/L)]
     Middleton Pond, sampled during the occurrence of a blue-green algal
bloom (Figures 58 to 63) and the laboratory grown culture of Anabaena flos
aquae (Figures 72 to 74) exhibited the greatest number of identifiable nitro-
genous compounds.  5-chlorouracil, thymine, and uracil were identified in
both of these samples.  Adenine, guanine, and purine were identified in
Middleton Pond and not in the Anabaena sample, while the reverse was found
for cytosine, pyrrole, and tryptophan.

     Comparison of raw and resin-filtered samples at the same collection
sites, showed that both different and some of the same compounds were iden-
tified in the dissimilarly treated samples.  One treatment did not appear to
favor the identification of a larger number of compounds.  The total number
                                     179

-------
          TABLE  32.  VALUES FOR CONVERTING PEAK HELGHTS OF NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS RESOLVED ON ZORBAX C8
                              TO CONCENTRATION IN rag/L (PHOSPHATE BUFFERED ELUANT)
oo
o
concentration
compound (mg/L)
barbituric acid
/-histidine
cytosine
creatinlne
guanine
5-chlorouracil
thymine
pyrrole
purine
tryptophan
pyrlmidine
indole
20
600
10
in
50
50
75
100
75
50
40
90
Absorbance at 233 nm
(absorbance units)
0.066
0.074
0.072
0.066
0.068
0.058
0.084
0.062
0.108
0.144
0.102
0.086
absorbance at 220 ran3
absorbance at 233 nm
1.22
1.72
1.35
0.66
1.28
2.87
2.23
5.13
0.82
6.09
0.36
8.40
absorbance at
220 nm per mg/L
of compound
(absorbance unit)"
.0040
.0002
.0097
.0044
.0006
.0033
.0025
.0032
.0012
.0175
.0009
.0080
         aAbsorbance ratios were determined from U.V. spectral  scans of  reference  compounds.   (Figures  17
           to 30)
           Absorbance at  220 nm per mg/L of compound = [(absorbance  at  233  nm)  x  (absorbance at 220 nm/
                                                      absorbance  at 233  nm)]/(concentration of compound in
                                                      mg/L)

-------
 of compounds identified at a given collection site was maximized by analyzing
 both raw and resin-filtered samples.

      Concentrations of organic nitrogen compounds ranged from 860 yg/L of
 adenine in Middleton Pond (7/11/78) to 10 yg/L of 5-chlorouracil in the raw
 laboratory grown culture of Anabaena flos aquae.   The average values for the
 compounds identified in the water supply samples were 367, 60, 20, 167, 200,
 110, and 160 yg/L of compounds, for adenine, 5-chlorouracil, cytosine,
 guanine, purine, thymine and uracil, respectively.  Uracil, adenine and
 guanine were found most frequently in the water supply samples while 5-chloro-
 uracil, cytosine and purine were only encountered once in these sources.  A
 total of 7 N-organic compounds were identified in the water supplies while 9
 compounds were found in the laboratory grown blue-green algal cultures.
 Pyrrole, tryptophan and tyrosine were found in the algal cultures and not in
 the water supplies.  Guanine was found in the water supplies but not in the
 algal cultures.

      The percent of organic nitrogen identified in each sample was calculated
 according to the equation:

                                 sum of organic nitrogen concentrations
                                 of individual compounds identified in
      % of organic nitrogen  _   	sample (yg N/L)	   ,,,-
       identified  in sample          total organic nitrogen (yg/L)
                                         determined in sample


 The total organic nitrogen was determined by Kjeldahl-N analysis.  Organic
 nitrogen concentrations of individual compounds identified in the samples
 were calculated according to the equation:


 organic nitrogen
 concentration of                          „        ,      ..
.  ,. . ,  ,        ,                 ,/T     yM compound  v  yM nitrogen
individual compound   =  yg compound/L  *  —	c	-r  x  -^	°—T
  identified in                           ^ comP°und     ^M compound
 sample (yg N/L)        , .
                     x  14 ug nitrogen                                    (12)
                         yM nitrogen


 The percent of organic nitrogen identified in the water supplies and blue-
 green algal cultures ranged from 0.7% to 18.8% (mean= 8%) and 0.2% to 6.3%
 (mean= 3%), respectively.   The majority of organic nitrogen in these samples,
 therefore, was not characterized.

      The types of compounds identified included:   amino acids (tyrosine and
 tryptophan), nucleic acid bases (adenine, cytosine, guanine, and uracil),
 purines (adenine, guanine, purine), and pyrimidines (cytosine, thymine, and
 uracil).  Three of these substances, uracil, pyrrole, and tryptophan, were
 previously shown to be precursors for the formation of trihalomethanes  (89,
 38).  Purines and pyrimidines were shown to be intermediates for compounds
                                     181

-------
causing mutagenic activity in finished waters upon chlorination  (90-96, 64).
5-chlorouracil was  shown to be mutagenic  (30,97).

Significance of Findings

     The  types and  concentrations  of  compounds  identified in municipal water
supplies  are environmentally significant  because of  their ability to yield
interference or false  positive tests  in determining  free chlorine, and to be
precursors of trihalomethanes during  chlorination.   Several trihalomethane
precursors were found  in the municipal water supply  samples and  in laboratory-
grown blue-green algal cultures:   pyrrole,  thymine,  tryptophan,  and uracil.
The molar yield of  chloroform of these materials was previously  determined in
laboratory studies  at  pH 7 by Baum (10) and are shown in Table 34.  Molar
yield is  defined as:   (moles of chloroform  formed)/(moles of compound used).


      TABLE 34.  HIGHEST CONCENTRATION OF CHLOROFORM PRODUCED AT pH 7a


compound                     time (hours)   molar yield of CHC1_(%)
pyrrole
thymine
tryptophan
tryptophan (pH=7.5)d
uracil
0.3
3.4
24.0
7.0
0.7
0.7
0.5
7.8
17.9
0.6
a                                        —5
 Initial chlorine concentration =  9.0x10   M; HOCl/compound ratio = 9:1
 except where noted; after  Baum (10).

b% molar yield of CHC1,  =  ^oles °*  chloroform formed)   x  WQ
                       3      (moles of  compound used)
c                                        —5
 Initial chlorine concentration =  10x10  M; HOCl/compound ratio = 10:1

 Initial chlorine concentration =  10 x io~  M; HOCl/compound ratio =20:1
     Table 35 shows  the  calculated  levels of chloroform produced by chlori-
nation of these compounds  in  samples  studied.   It was assumed that the in-
organic compounds yielded  chloroform  according  to the values shown in Table
34, and that they would  not be  removed prior to chlorination of the water
supplies.  The calculated  total production of chloroform  for all the samples
was well below the proposed maximum contaminant level of  0.1 mg/L (100 ppb)
for total trihalogenated methanes  (73).

     The molar yield of  chloroform, however, is highly pH dependent.  The
molar yield of tryptophan, for  example,  increases from 7.8% to pH 7, to 17.9%
at pH 7.5, 24% at pH 8,  and about  31% at pH 9.  The molar yield of uracil
                                     182

-------
 TABLE 35.  CALCULATED LEVELS OF CHC1, PRODUCED IN WATER SAMPLES CONTAINING
             N-ORGANIC SUBSTANCES UPON CHLORINATION (AT pH 7)a
site
Middleton Pond
Danvers, MA
7/11/78
compound
thymine
uracil
concentration
(UM/L)
1.90
2.23
chloroform
produced^5
(uM/L)
0.010
0.013
chloroform
produced
(ug/D
1.26
1.46
Concord River
Billerica, MA
7/4/78
uracil
Andbaena flos aquae  uracil
culture              tryptophan

Osci.'llatoria tenu-is  uracil
culture
0.54
                 0.89
                 0.15

                 0.18
0.003
               0.005
               0.011

               0.001
0.36
                0.60
                2.34

                0.12
 Proposed maximum contaminant level = 100 Mg/L chloroform.
'Chloroform produced (pM/L) = concentration (yM/L) * molar yield of CHC13 (%)
increases from 0.6% at pH 7 to about 8% at pH 8 and about 40% at pH 9.  One
hundred percent molar yield of chloroform is obtained for uracil above about
pH 10.  The molar yield for pyrrole increases (after about 24 hours contact
time) from 0.5% at pH 7.5 to 7.6% at pH 9.1.  Some of these values were
obtained by allowing mixtures to react at neutral or slightly acidic pH values
for several hours with subsequent increase of pH by addition of NaOH.  The
reader is referred to Baum's thesis (10) for a full discussion of these
reactions.  The chloroform which could be produced by the N-organic compounds
present in the water supplies and laboratory blue-green algal cultures under
more alkaline conditions are shown in Table 36.  The calculated levels of
chloroform formed under the more alkaline conditions in the Middleton Pond
and Concord River samples are more than 10% of the proposed maximum conta-
minant level for total trihalomethanes and are therefore significant.
Additional N-organic compounds not identified in the dissolved N-organic
fraction of these samples might additionally contribute to the level of CHCla
production.  The increased molar yield of CHCls in alkaline waters stresses
the need to carefully monitor the pH of water supplies in treatment facilities
and to provide increased organic contaminant removal capabilities in alkaline
waters.

     The significance of the levels of N-organic materials identified in  the
water supplies can also be evaluated by calculating the amount of combined
chlorine which may be formed during chlorination.  As discussed previously,
                                     183

-------
 TABLE 36.  CALCULATED LEVELS OF CHCl^ PRODUCED IN WATER SUPPLIES CONTAINING
       N-ORGANIC SUBSTANCES UPON CHLORINATION (AT HIGHER pH VALUES


                                                       chloroform produced
site                          compound                        (yg/L)

                                                                  Q
Middleton Pond                thymine                           NC
Danvers, MA                   uracil                       20.0 (pH 8)
7/11/78                                                    99.9 (pH 9)

Concord River                 uracil                        4.8 (pH 8)
Billerica, MA                                              24-2
7/4/78
Anabaena flos aquae
culture
Oscillatoria tenu-is
culture
uracil
tryptophan
uracil
8.0 (pH 8)
39.9 (pH 9)
5.5 (pH 7.5)
7.4 (pH 8)
9.5 (pH 9)
1.6 (pH 8)
8.1 (pH 9)
a
 Proposed  maximum contaminant level = 100 yg/L chloroform
b
 Chloroform produced (yg/L)
 concentration of compound
         (uM/L)           J
[molar  yield of CHCl-j atl x yg compound
[particular pH value  (%)]   yM compound
 CNC:   not calculated because data on % chloroform yield at higher  pH  values
 was  unavailable.
 combined chlorine is a much less active disinfectant than free chlorine.   The
 combined forms,  however, tend to react similarly with many analytical reagents
 for active chlorine.  When these N-chloro compounds are formed,  tests for  free
 chlorine may indicate a non-existent bactericidal or virucidal behavior.
 Table 37 shows the calculated values of combined chlorine that could be
 formed during chlorination.  The total conversion of N-organic constituents
 to combined forms and a 1:1 molar reaction are assumed.

      Chlorine residuals of 0.2 to 1 mg/L after 15 to 30 minues of contact
 time generally result in 99.9% destruction of Escheriohia ooli (1) (an in-
 dicator species for pathogenic bacteria) in drinking water.  A 15 minute free
 chlorine residual of 0.5 mg/L is generally taken as an acceptable level of
 disinfection (1).  If this residual is comprised of the less germicidal
 combined forms, however, the water supply may not be hygienically safe.  The
 calculated levels of combined forms of chlorine yielding falsely positive

                                      184

-------
 TABLE 37.   CALCULATED VALUES OF COMBINED  CHLORINE  FORMED UPON CHLORINATION
 sample
compound
molar concentration
     (yM/L)
 Billerica,  MA
 6/9/78

 Concord River
 Billerica,  MA
 7/4/78
adenine
guanine
uracil
     1.11
     1.12
     0.54
active chlorine
concentration3
   (mg/L)
Middle ton Pond
Danvers , MA
7/11/78)



Concord River
adenine
5-chlorouracil
purine
thymine
uracil
total 	 ,
guanine
6.36
0.41
1.67
1.90
2.23

0.93
0.452
0.029
0.119
0.135
0.158
	 0.982
0.066
    0.79
    0.80
    0.38
                 total 	 0.197
   active chlorine concentration =
[concentration of compound (yM/L)]  x
                     71 pg chlorine determined
                     as free aqueous chlorine
                        yM combined chlorine
                              x  10~   mg/pg
                                     185

-------
tests for  free  aqueous  chlorine  in  the Middleton Pond sample and in one
sample from  the Concord River were  calculated  to be 0.982 and 0.197 mg/L
free aqueous chlorine,  respectively.  Assumed  free chlorine residuals of
0.5 mg/L in  the finished drinking water  from these sources, then, might not
provide adequate disinfection, since  a significant portion of this value may
be comprised of the  less germicidal combined forms.

     The finding of  trihalomethane  (THM) precursors at levels which could
produce significant  amounts  of chloroform upon chlorination under alkaline
pH conditions,  and the  demonstration  that the  N-organic constituents iden-
tified could lead to false positive tests for  free chlorine stresses the
environmental significance of the findings of  this study.  A subcommittee of
the National Research Council recently reported (98) that it was virtually
impossible for  researchers to establish  a link between THM's in drinking
water and an increase in human cancer because  of the inherent complexities
of such epidemiological studies.  It  did not,  however, refute the possible
causal relationship  between  carcinogenesis in  humans and the presence of
THM's and other carcinogens  in water  supplies.  A study by Cantor and McCabe
(99) supported  the suspicion that a real link  existed between organic con-
taminants in drinking water  supplies  and cancer rates in the human population.
The study fell  short, however, of providing the association.  The presence of
N-organic compounds  in  water supplies, from the standpoint of human health,
exertion of  chlorine demand,  reaction with chlorine to form less bactericidal
and virucidal chloramines, production of objectionable tastes, and direct
carcinogenic and mutagenic effects  is therefore significant.

     This study also raises  concern about the  potability of finished water
during occurrences of summer blue-green  algal  blooms.  Aside from the taste
and odors associated with such occurrences, high levels of N-organic material
released by  these algae,  could result in increased THM formation as well as
combined N-chloro forms yielding falsely positive tests for free chlorine.
During the occurrence of  such algal blooms, superintendents of treatment
facilities should be advised to carefully monitor the pH of the water during
chlorination and to  provide  increased organic  contaminant removal capabilities
in alkaline  waters where  THM formation is more favored.  Removal of organic
contaminants could be achieved by use of resins which selectively remove
organic contaminants or conventional  methods such as carbon adsorption, or
chemical coagulation.   Because all  of the methods currently used to measure
free chlorine are subject to interference from organic chloramines, enumera-
tion of bacteria after  chlorination should be  examined closely in addition
to maintaining  a chlorine residual  somewhat greater than what is normally
acceptable,  to  ensure a sufficiently  disinfected water.
                                    186

-------
                                  SECTION 5

   REACTIONS BETWEEN NITROGENOUS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND AQUEOUS CHLORINE


     A broad spectrum of nitrogenous compounds at concentrations in the range
of milligrams per liter were examined for their reactions with aqueous
chlorine in dilute aqueous solution.  The major types of reactivity studied
were:  (1) chlorine demand, as a measure of the occurrence of either redox
processes or the formation of chlorinated organic compounds;   (2) chloramine
formation as shown by alteration in the reactions of the residual available
chlorine with selective analytical reagents;  (3) details of  reactions as
shown by changes in the ultraviolet spectra of mixtures of the compounds with
aqueous chlorine; and  (4) analysis of appropriate reaction mixtures for
formation of halogenated methanes or other volatile chlorinated compounds
resulting from the chlorination of nitrogenous materials.

     Selected nitrogenous organic compounds were assessed during a series of
screening experiments using chlorine demand and ultraviolet spectrophoto-
metric scans to detect the formation of chlorinated derivatives.  The chlorine
demand exerted by these compounds was most significant as shown in Table 38.
All of these nitrogenous compounds exhibited substantial chlorine demand at
concentrations in the range of  1-10 mg per liter within several hours of
contact, indicating the importance of nitrogenous materials with respect to
the  total organic content of natural waters.  Although nitrogenous materials
may  constitute only 5% of the organic matter in a natural water, for example,
they may account for 25% of the demand.

     The potential of selected  compounds as precursors  to chloroform formation
was  also investigated.  Initial experiments were  carried out  near pH 7 with
concentrations of aqueous chlorine  typically less  than  7 milligrams per  liter.
The  amount  of chloroform produced as a  function of  time was determined for
selected compounds, at pH values between 6 and 11.   Studies were also made  to
determine  the effect of increasing  the  pH  of reaction mixtures  after  they had
been allowed to  react at an initial  pH  value for  several hours.


ANALYTICAL  METHODS
     The  concentrations of  chlorine  solutions  and organic reagents  typically
utilized  in the  experiments were  10"1* molar or less.   Frequently,  studies
were carried out with  concentrations as small  as  one micromole  per  liter.
Because  of  this,  scrupulous  care  had to be taken to diminish the likelihood
of contamination during  the  preparation of reagents.   Furthermore,  additional
precautions had  to  be  taken throughout  the analyses to reduce or eliminate
errors due to extraneous  substances or  specific  problems inherent  in  some of
the  analytical  techniques.   Routine laboratory operations were  carried out con-
sistently according to the following procedure.

                                      187

-------
             TABLE 38.  NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS UNDER INVESTIGATION
Compound
Adenine
Alanine
m-Aminophenol
Arginine
Aspartic Acid
Barbituric Acid
Caffeine
Creatinine
Cyanuric Acid
Cytosine
Glutamic Acid
Glycylglycine
Histidine
Indole
Phenylalanine
Proline
Purine
Pyrrole
Sarcosine
Succinimide
Thymine
Tryptophan
Uracil
Uric Acid
Tyrosine
N-Chlor
Formation
X

X


X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Chlorine
Demand3
+ 3
+ 1.5
+ 5
+ 2.5
+ 3
+ 4
0
+ 1 (v.s.)
0
+ 2
+ 2
0
+ 2
+ 8
+ 2.5
+ 1.5
0
+ 5.5
0
0
+ 3
+13
+ 3
+ 3
+ 3
U.V. Spectrum
Study
X

X


X
X
X

X



X
X


X



X
X


a
 A plus sign  indicates  demand greater  than  one mole of chlorine per mole of
 compound after  several hours of  reaction with excess chlorine.  Numbers
 give the moles  of  chlorine  demand  per mole of substrate after 5 to 10 hours
 reaction time with excess chlorine present.
Glassware
     Prior to initial use, all glassware was thoroughly cleaned using
laboratory detergent, rinsing with dilute HC1, and final rinsing with
distilled, chlorine-demand-free water.  Spectrophotometric cells were
periodically soaked in a solution of 50% ethanol and 50% 3N HC1 prior to a
distilled water rinse.
                                    188

-------
Reagent Preparation and Analytical Procedure

Chloride-Free-HOCl Solutions —
     In order to minimize the loss of HOC1, concentrated aqueous chlorine
stock solutions were prepared under a hood by bubbling chlorine gas from a
sintered-glass diffuser into a 2 liter Erlenmeyer flask containing distilled
water until a chartreuse color was attained.  After neutralization to about
pH 6 with concentrated sodium hydroxide, the chlorine solution was distilled
in a rotary vacuum distiller at 30-35°C.  The condensate (chloride-free) was
stored under refrigeration in low-actinic, Pyrex-glass bottles.  This con-
centrated stock solution, which remained stable for months, was used to
prepare all aqueous chlorine (HOC1) solutions.

     Buffer — To simulate conditions encountered in natural systems, a bicar-
bonate C02 buffer (pH approximately 7.0) was employed.  Two methods generally
were used to prepare buffer solutions.  In the first dilute HC1 (and, if
necessary, dilute NaOH) was used to adjust the pH of 10~3 M (1.0 mM) NaHC03
solution to 7.  In the second method carbon dioxide gas was bubbled through
the 10~3 M (1.0 mM) NaHC03 until pH 7 was obtained.  With the latter tech-
nique, a high background concentration of chloride was avoided.

     Phosphate and Borax buffers, shown below, were used to achieve pH values
between 5 and 10.
     5.91   KHP0  (6-OOx 10~4M);  NaHP0  (8.38xlO~M)
     6.98   KHP0  (2.67 x 1Q~4M);  NaHP0   (5.02xlO~4M)
     7.73   KH2P04 (6.69 x 10"5M);  Na2HP04  (7.53xlO~4M)

     9.50   Na2B40?  - 10 H20 (.05M)

    10      Carbonate/bicarbonate buffer

All buffers were prepared with chlorine-demand-free distilled water and
stored in glass carbons.


CHLOROFORM STANDARDS

     Standard solutions of chloroform for the calibration of the gas  chroma-
tographic equipment were prepared by dissolving  1 ml of chloroform in 20 ml
of 9.5% ethanol and diluting to one liter with distilled water.  After
mixing, 5 ml of this solution was diluted to 250 ml with distilled water,
followed by further dilution of 5 ml to one liter with distilled water.
This produced a chloroform standard that contained 148 mg per liter of
chloroform.  Screw cap vaccine vials (25 ml) were filled to overflowing with
portions of this final solution, capped with Tuf-Bond  (making sure that no
air bubbles were formed), and placed in the refrigerator until  use.   Fresh
standards were prepared in this manner at least  once a weak.
                                     189

-------
Equipment

Spectrophotometers—
     A Beckman DU spectrophotometer was used for the various colorimetric
determinations of free available chlorine.  Analyses were carried out in
the visible wavelength range with matched one cm cells using distilled water
as the reference solution.

     A Beckman DK-2 spectrophotometer was used to monitor the ultraviolet
absorption of aqueous solutions of individual compounds investigated prior
to and during contact with aqueous chlorine.  Distilled water was used as
the reference solution.

Gas Chromatographs—
     Gas chromatographic measurements of concentrations of chloroform pro-
duced during experiments were carried out at the Lawrence Experiment Station
of the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering in
Lawrence, Massachusetts.  The instrument most frequently used consisted of
a Chromalytics 1047 Concentrator, Tracer 222 gas chromatograph, and Tracer
310 Hall electrolytic conductivity detector.  A second chromatograph, the
programmable Tracer 560 equipped with a Tekmar Liquid Sample Concentrator
(model LSC-1) and a Tracer 700 Hall electrolytic conductivity detector, was
used periodically.  Although the response of the Tracer 560 was approximately
an order of magnitude more sensitive than that of the 222, the selective
adsorption principle of operation remained the same.  In each case, the
volatile components were purged with nitrogen (Matheson cylinder) from a
five-mi aqueous sample and collected on a site-sampling tube packed with
TENAX resins.  The tube was then heated to desorb the adsorbed volatiles and
pass them from the first tube to a concentrator U-tube trap again packed with
TENAX.  Then the latter tube was heated in a programmed manner from 130°F to
180°F to transfer the volatile materials to the chromatographic column.
This precolumn technique was needed to provide the slug sample required for
gas chromatographic determinations.

     Individual compounds were selectively desorbed during the temperature
program and combined with deionized solvent in a gas-liquid contactor.  The
Hall detector continuously monitored the electrical conductivity of the
liquid.  Thus, the concentrations of the halogenated materials were shown
potentiometrically as a strip chart recorder print-out.  Peak heights were
quantitatively calibrated by comparison with standards which were run at
least once each day.

Chlorine-Demand

     Chlorine-demand studies were conducted according to the following
general procedure:  0.50-0.20 millimolar of each organic compound was made
up in a 500 ml volumetric flask using 0.01 M NaHC03 solution.  A volume of
stock aqueous chlorine solution sufficient to give a molar ratio for chlorine
to organic compound usually about 4 or 5 to one was placed in a second 500 ml
volumetric flask and diluted to the mark with 0.01 M NaHC03.
                                    190

-------
     For initiation of reaction the contents of the two flasks were poured
simultaneously into a two-liter reagent bottle of low actinic glass.  Samples
(100 ml) were removed from the reagent bottle at suitable times after mixing
and the concentrations of residual chlorine were determined by thiosulfate
titration following addition of iodide and acetic acid using starch as in-
dicator.  Some attempts were also made to determine free chlorine by titration
with methyl orange.  The results agreed generally with the total residual
chlorine measurements.

     Samples from many of the reaction mixtures were placed in spectrophoto-
metric cells and measurements of ultraviolet spectra were made at a number of
times with a Beckman-DK2 spectrophotometer.  The proportion of chlorine
concentration remaining (chlorine at time, t/initial chlorine) was computed
at various times.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Chlorine-Demand of N-Organic Compounds

     Chlorine-demand provides a direct measure of the overall extent to which
organic matter has been oxidized, and, when combined with differential
chloride determinations, provides a measure of total chloro-organic compound
produced by means of the equation

         Cl-demand  =  Cl -formed + C-C1 bonds formed                     (13)

Studies concerning the chlorine demand of selected N-organic compounds are
shown graphically in Figures 110 through 121.

     The chlorine-demand ratio (CDR) is given by equation (14) :


                                         (C1Q) - (Clt)
         Chlorine-demand ratio (CDR)  =  - ,„ , ^ -                     (14)
where
         Cl   =  the added initial molar concentration of chlorine in  the
                 reaction mixture
         Cl   =  the molar concentration of chlorine remaining at any  time,  t

        Cpd   =  the added initial molar concentration of compound in  the
                 reaction mixture.
Alanine, CH3CH(NH2)COOH—
     A demand experiment was made on this typical amino acid at a molar  ratio
of aqueous chlorine to alanine equal to 4, the initial concentrations being
5 * 10~5 alanine, and  2x10~"M chlorine.  The results obtained were:

          time, hr.      2     5     7.5   72
          demand ratio   1.4   1.5   1.6   1.7


                                     191

-------
   3.0
   3.o
   1.0
   0.5
Glut ami c acid

Chlorine

                          T/ME.
                        05
                       ,20
          ppm
          7.36
                                          molar
                                          ratio
                                                     i c» CMC'-"V>e.oo*
L-Alanine
Chlorine
Arginine
Chlorine
.05

.02
                       .20      llf.15
                                 8.71
Figure  110.  Chlorine demand of selected N-organic compounds,
                             192

-------
3-S
3-o
J 5
1-5
1.0
 o-s
   °    I    2
   m-Amino phenol
   Chlorine
.10      10.9




.80      56.6
                                                        /
                                                       /
               j>f.f^ffy
                          35   Jt.   S?   it
                                            molar

                                            ratio
                                                          *
                                                            Wri,
   Creatinino
   Chlorine
.20
          p.65
                                                      o''
   Din: thyl -Tiir.o-

   benzaldolrrJe
   Chlorine
 10
         28.3
                                                        CHO
 Figure 111.  Chlorine demand of  selected N-organic compounds.
                             193

-------
o
c
tv
  7-0


   •

  (..o




  ££>
    L-Tryptopha-i
    Chlorine
                                         Try pi-   6: I
                                          X
                                           X (•
                                 ^uisj
1J
ki
^ 2.0
|.<3
0
Ph. flja ^/:' x
A A • « —-" *"
Cfiff.

       77*vr


       TOT



        .20
         PPi"
         10.2
         14-15
molar
ratio



8:1
    Phony lalanine
    Chlorine
       l.k     231.0



       5.6     396.0
    Caffeine
    Chlorine
.05


.20
                  9.7
    Proline
    Chlorine

      Figure 112,
        .05      5.76
                28.30
                                            8:1
Chlorine demand of selected N-organic compounds.


              194

-------
 Barbituric  acid
9 _
 Chlorine



 Indole
• —
 Chlorine
.10


.60
12.8
          5.86

.20      11;. 15
                                        Xndotff
                                         molar
                                         ratio
          6:1
 Figure 113.  Chlorine demand of selected N-organic compounds,
                         195

-------
y-s
3.S
3.0
2.S
X-5
/.o
           Jo   ff   (,0   fS   9o   /of   /
                                                         O
                                                         'f
-------
3-0



1-5
l-o
0.5
       /    2.
           Creatinine
           Chlorine
                                     *    9
                                  .20
                                                     St.   si   6?   -Z'f   to
                                                    molar
                                                    ratio
           5.65
             .15
           Phenylalanine
           Chlorine
l.if      231.0



5.6      396.0
            Dime thy ia^iino-
            benzaldehyde
            Chlorine
 .10
          23.30
          Figure 115.  Chlorine demand of  selected N-organic compounds,
                                 197

-------
o.s
0.3
0.2
o.l
       i   y    *    /
 Creatinine


 Chlorine



 Caffeine
•	

 Chlorine
                              ft to
                                   .10


                                   .10
10.3

 7.08
                                   .05       9.7

                                   .20      llj.,15
molar
ratio


1:1
          Figure 116. Chlorine demand of  selected N-organic compounds.
                                   198

-------
f.
£o
2-0
 l.o
        A.
       X

                                      Trypt-
              t:l

-------
J.o
/•S
/.*
O.S
           Pyrrole
          • 	-_

           Chlorine



           Pyrrole
          t	

           Chlorine
 .30      20.1

1.50     106.25


 .15      10.1

 .60      U2.5
                                                    molar
                                                    ratio
5:1
          Figure 118.   Chlorine demand of selected N-organic compounds,
                                 200

-------
  c
 A
                                                   rv» - fln*. -Ph.
                                                m.« /}»»».  -ph.
3-o
                                                        . "Ph.    j:
2.0
1-0
       HOURS
            Figure 119.  Chlorine demand  of  selected  N-organic compounds.
                                       201

-------

_ffM_
.10

.50
.10
.1*0

10.9

35A
10.9
28.3
molar
ratio
5:1


U:1
  m-Ar.iinophcnol

  1	
  Chlorine
  m-Aminophenol
 •	
  Chlorine
  m-Aminophenol     .10     10.9
  '—                                 3:1
  Chlorine           .30     21.2lj
  m-Aminophenol      .10     10.9
   	                                2:1
  Chlorine           .20     1^.15
  m-Aminophenol     .10     10,9
-n	
  Chlorine           .10      7.08
                Figure 119  (continued)

                       202

-------
O.i
            Phsnylanino
            Chlorine
                                 MM
.01
.06
                                                                  S
1.65
                                                            I3Tȣ>
                                                    molar
                                                    ratio
                                                   6:1
       -Q-sarie as above,  deten^.ined by  Hethvl Orange  nethod
            Creatinine
            Chlorine
.01


.05
                                           1.13
                                           3.51;
                                                   5:1
      	o-sane  as above,  detcrnined by Methyl Orange method


        Figure 120.  Chlorine  demand  of selected N-organic compounds.
                                203

-------
                                                                                                         /
°r,-<
                    Figure 121.   Chlorine demand of selected N-organic compounds.

-------
                                           molar
                                   ppn     ratio
    Pyrrole            .0072       .l;b
     	
    Chlorine           ,06        lj.,25
          as  ;bove,  det^r.-.ined by llethyl Cr-:ji6e rr.ethod
    ?yrrole            ^011^       .97
    •	                                    7:1
    Chlorine           .10        7.08
          as  above, determined by  llethyl Orange method
    Tyrrole            .OIlUj.       .97
    •	                                   5.7:1
    Chlorine           .08        5.66
—O-sane  as  above, as determined by Methyl Orroige  method
                   Figure 121  (continued)
                            205

-------
      (Demands,  here and in the other tables,  are  expressed as moles of
chlorine  reduced  per initial mole of organic  compound.)

      The  results  are reasonably consistent  with the  equation;


           CH3CH(NH2)COOH + 2HOC& -»• CH COCOOH  + NH_C£ + H+ + CH~ + HJ3


provided  there  is some concurrent or subsequent oxidation of ammonia to
nitrogen.

Arginine,  H2NCH2CH2CH(NH2)COOH—
      This  basic amino acid is of interest because of the alternate opportuni-
ties  for N-chlor  compound formation.   An experiment  with a molar ratio of
aqueous chlorine  to arginine_equal to 4, the  initial concentrations being
5 x io~5M arginine and  2 x 10~2M chlorine, gave the following data:

           time, hr.     ?     5     7.5  72
           demand        1.9   2.3   2.4   2.5

      The results  suggest oxidative deamination at one amino group followed
by breakpoint oxidation of the liberated ammonia.  The fact that the behavior
is similar to that of other natural amino acids suggests that this reaction
is occurring at the a-amino group.   The suggested reaction, then, is

      H2NCH2CH2CH(NH2)COOH+2.5 HOCfc •* H2NCH2CH2COCOOH + ~ NZ + 2.5 Cfc~

                                                      + 2.5 H+ + 1.5 H0  .
Creatinine,
     Creatinine, a urinary  excretory product, was considered a likely nitro-
genous constituent of waters  polluted by animals or man.  It has two pro-
spective sites for N-chlor ination, one a ring N-H, amide-like in structure,
the other an amino group.

     Three kinetic runs were  performed with mixtures of creatinine and aqueous
chlorine, at molar chlorine to creatinine ratios of 1:1, 4:1 and 5:1.
                      -4                  -4
     Mixture 1;  1 x 1Q  M chlorine;  1 x IQ ^M creatinine
t ime , hr .
demand
Mixture 2: 2 x
time, hr.
demand
Mixture 3 : 5 x
time, hr.
demand
0
0
.1 2
.5 0
10~4M
0
0
.1
.1
10" 5M
0
0
.1
.5
.65
7
0
chlorine;
0
0
.25
.3
1
0
chlorine;
0
0
.25
.8
1
1
.9 25,
.65 0,
5 x
.5
.4
lx
.2
.0
ID"5
3.
0.
It)'5
1.
1.
M
5
7
M
6
3
.5
.75


creatinine
5
0
.8
.85
9.3 57
1.3 3.1
creatinine
5
1

.8
24
3.0
                                    206

-------
     Concurrent spectrophotometric observations on the 1:1 and 4:1 mixtures
were not very informative.  The 1:1 mixture showed enhanced absorbance in the
region near 230 nm, the wavelength of maximum absorption for creatine.  This
might indicate of an N-chloro derivative or oxidation product of creatinine
in which the fundamental absorbing structure had not been changed.  The ab-
sorption at 230 nm continued increasing throughout the run for this chlorine
to creatinine ratio.  With the 4:1 mixture the increase was less pronounced,
the wavelength of maximum absorption was shifted toward 220 nm and the over-
all absorption began decreasing after about 9 hours of reaction and continued
to do so subsequently throughout the reaction period.

     Creatinine thus exhibits a small immediate demand followed by a continued
slow exertion of demand to at least 3 moles of chlorine for each mole of
creatinine.  Presumably some oxidized intermediate is formed which is then
subject to additional oxidation slowly in the presence of excess chlorine.
Other than this, no plausible reaction scheme can be proposed at present.

Glutamic Acid, HOOC2CH?CH CH(NH2)COOH—
     A single experiment at 4:1 molar ratio of chlorine to glutamic acid, the
concentrations being  2 x 10~'*M  and  5 * 10~5M, gave the following results:

          time, hr.      2     5     7.5   72
          demand         1.8   2.0   2.0    2.0

     Although the molar demand is a bit low for completion of the reaction


HOOCCH2CH2CH(NH2)COOH + 2.5 HOC£ -»• HOOCCH2CH2COCOOH +2.5 Cfc~ + 0.5 NZ

                                                    + 2.5 H+ + 1.5 H)  ,
this seems the most reasonable mechanism to propose.  A corresponding experi
ment with aspartic acid, HOOCCH2CH(NH2)COOH, gave somewhat greater molar
demands, 1.8 after 2 hours, 2.0 after 5 hours and 3.5 at 72 hours.  There is
potential chloroform formation from the initial oxaloacetic acid product,
HOOCCH2COCOOH in this case.

Indole, C8H7N—
     Indole is one of the substances studied showing strong chlorine demand.
At chlorine to indole ratios up to 4 the chlorine was essentially completely
reduced in an hour or less.  The tabulated data are for molar ratios of 4:1
and 8:1, both with  5 x 10~5M indole, the initial chlorine concentrations
being  2 x 10~4M and  4 x 10~"M, respectively.

          4:1  molar ratio

          time, hrs.  0.1   0.5   1.5   3.5   6.2   25     32
          demand      1.1   2.6   3.7   3.9   4.0    4.0    4.0

          8:1  molar ratio

          time, hrs.  0.1   0.5   2.6   5     9     26
          demand      2.0   2.5   4.9   5.5   6.2    7.4

                                    207

-------
     Although  the  reaction of  chlorine  in  these experiments was extensive,
the maximum  chlorine demand shown,  7.4  moles of chlorine per mole of indole,
is still  far less  than  the 19.5 moles needed for complete oxidation to COa,
Na and H20.  Accordingly,  there is  good indication of partially oxidized
organic intermediates,  but whether  these are chlorinated or not cannot be
judged.

     Formation of  partial  oxidation products was also shown visually by the
appearance of  yellow colors in both solutions within 0.5 hr. of the start of
reaction  that  persisted throughout  the  runs to at least 55 hours with the 4:1
molar ratio.

     Spectrophotometrically, both reaction mixtures exhibited initial intensi-
fication  of  absorption  in  the  270-280 nm absorption band and a batho chromic
shift of  absorption near 220 nm.  After 30 minues these maxima gradually
diminished and were replaced by increasing absorption near 250 nm.  This ab-
sorption  continued to increase for  24 hours in the solution with the molar
ratio equal  to 4 and thea  became substantially constant.  At the molar ratio
of 8, maximum  absorption at 250 nm  was  reached after 80 minutes; thereafter
the absorption decreased continuously throughout the ultraviolet range,
indicating general oxidation to nonabsorbing products.
m-Aminophenol,
     This compound is of  interest  because of  its  structural similarity to
resorcinol, which Rook  (35)  found  to yield molar  quantities of chloroform
when chlorinated.  It also possesses structural similarities to some naturally
occurring aromatic amines.   Because ingested  amines may react in the stomach
with nitrite from saliva  to  give nitrosamines, the general destructiveness of
aqueous chlorine toward amines with consequent elimination of carcinogenic
potential is noteworthy as a contrast  to the  general nonreactivity of chlorine
dioxide and ozone towards amines and amides as a  class.

     A series of experiments was conducted with aqueous chlorine and m-
aminophenol at molar chlorine to amine ratios ranging from 0.5 to 8.  Sub-
stantially complete disappearance  of available chlorine occurred within two
minutes for all but the two  largest ratios, 5 and 8.  Demand data for the
runs at these two ratios, both with 1.0 x lO'^M in-aminophenol, were as follows:

          5:1  molar ratio;   initial Cl = 5 x
time, hr.
demand
8:1 molar
time, hr.
demand
0.
4.
1
6
ratio;
0.
2.
1
7
0
4
.6
.7
3.
4.
initial
0
2
.5
.9
1.
3.
5
8
Cl
7
0
7
4
=
6
3

.8
Q xx
.3
.4
24
4

.8


10~4M
9.
3.
5
8
57
4.5
     The reason for the relatively  small molar demand observed with the 8:1
chlorine to amine ratio is unknown.   It is  inconsistent with  the rapidity and
completeness of chlorine  consumption  observed in  all the other experiments.
                                     208

-------
     A number of color changes was observed in the different reaction mix-
tures.  With the 0.5 molar ratio of chlorine to amine a pale pink color
developed as the reactants were mixed.  This color persisted for some time;
the solution changed to a peach hue over several hours and eventually became
pale yellow after about 30 hours.  With molar chlorine to amine ratios of 1,
2 and 3 the solutions developed more intense pink colors that persisted for
longer times.  In all instances, however, the colors had changed to peach
after about 18 hours and faded to haylike tinges after 25 to 30 hours.  At
the molar chlorine to amine ratio of 5 there were flashes of pink color
during mixing, but the fully mixed solution- was initially pale yellow and
became colorless within 3 minutes.  Formation of transient intermediates that
are further oxidized in the presence of excess free chlorine is indicated.

     Ultraviolet spectral changes during these color shifts were not dramatic.
Generally increased ultraviolet absorbance was observed for all studied ratios
of chlorine to amine.  The increase was quite large for the first few minutes
of reaction, but rather minor thereafter.  An absorption band developed near
310 nm, most prominently when the chlorine to amine ratio was  3.

Phenylalanine , CaHiiOaN

     Three experiments were conducted with this amino acid, at molar chlorine
to amine ratios of 4, 6 and 8.  The results obtained were:

     4;1 ratio;

     time, hr.
     demand

     6;1 ratio;

     time, hr.
     demand

     8;1 ratio;  4 x 1Q~3M Cl.
5.
0.
2.
6:
0.
1.
6
2
1
x 10
0.
2.
M
8
4
< 10~5M Cl
1
6
0.
1.
2
7
Cl,
5
2.
i
0.
2.

1.4
x
10
M
phenylalanine
60
6
1
7
2

x 10
1
2
3
•
-5
•
•
5
5
8
M




phenylalanine
5
2.5


                               5 x 1Q~4M phenylalanine
time, hr.
demand
0.1
1.4
2.8
1.9
9.4
2.3
26
3.5
     The observed demands, for the first 5 hours or so, corresponded to the
expected value of 2.5 for the reaction.

     C,H,.CH0CH(NH-)COOH + 2.5 HOCJ, •* C,H,.CH-COCOOH + ^ N. + 4 H00
      O j  /     i.                    O J  /         2.  2.   L  2.
                                                   + | a" + | H+

     A pungent odor, characterized as sharp, cabbage-like and "organic", was
produced during the reaction between aqueous chlorine and phenylalanine.  It
may be due to phenylpyruvic acid or perhaps to some chlorinated intermediates
Its occurrence suggests a source of tastes and odors developed as a result of
chlorination.
                                     209

-------
      Spectrophotometric  observations  showed  a  strong increase of overall
absorption  in  the  region of  the  257 nm peak  of phenylalanine soon after start
of reaction, but no  loss of  structure of  the absorption band occurred, in-
dicating  lack  of change  in the benzene rings itself.  At the molar ratio of
chlorine  to amino  acid equal to  4  the spectrum became quite stable after
about 30  minutes.  At the molar  ratio of  8 there was a continuing slow in-
crease in absorption at  250-260  nm up to  26  hours.

Pyrrole,  C^H^N—

      Several quantitative demand runs were conducted with pyrrole at molar
chlorine  to amine  ratios ranging from 4 to 8.3.  Qualitative observations
were made on mixtures with smaller ratios.
     When pyrrole was mixed  at  the  10"**  level with an equal molarity of
aqueous chlorine, there was  essentially  complete reaction of the available
chlorine within  2 minutes.   The reaction was accompanied by increased ultra-
violet absorption,  indicating  that  the process was not simple oxidative
destruction of the  pyrrole.  Little further spectral change occurred for the
next several hours,  but overnight a small absorption maximum appeared at
280 nm, indicating  continuing  reaction even in the absence of available
chlorine .
     Data from  the  quantitative  runs were as follows:

          ratio 4:1;   6 * 10~4M C&.  1.5 *10~4M pyrrole
time, hr.
demand
0.1
2.6
0.25
3.1
1.0
3.6
3.0
3.7
6.0
3.8
23.5
3.9
          ratio 5:1;   1.5  x  1Q~3M  Cl,   3  *  10~Sl pyrrole
t ime , hr .
demand
0.1
2.6
0.25
3.6
1.0
3.7
3.0
4.2
6.0
4.4
23
4.5
time, hr.
demand
0.1
3.7
0.2
3.9
0.5
4.4
1.0
4.5
2.0
4.8
3.0
5.0
          ratio  7:1;
1x1Q"4M C&.
1.4 x10 5M pyrrole
                                                            46
                                                             3.9
                                                            46
                                                             4.6
          ratio  5.7:1;  8 x 1Q  5M C&.   1.4 *  1Q 5M pyrrole
                                                          23
                                                           5.7
time,
demand
ratio
time,
demand
hr.

8.3
hr.

0
3
:1?
0
4
.1
.3
6
.1
.3
0.
3.
x 10
0.
4.
2
7
-5M
3
8
1
4
C
2
5
.8
.9
X* j
.3
.4
5.3
5.1
0.72
5.2
5.8
23
5.
xlO~5
24
6.

7
M

5


pyrrole


     As can be seen,  the molar demand of pyrrole for aqueous chlorine is
great, increasing  to  at least 6.5 when  there is substantial residual chlorine
in the solution.   When the  initial molar ratio of pyrrole to chlorine was 4,
the nearly immediate  molar  demand of about 3 was accompanied by the develop-
ment of an ultraviolet absorption band  with a maximum near 250 nm.  The
                                     210

-------
intensity of this band decreased gradually over the succeeding several hours
as the remaining available chlorine reacted.  Similar results were obtained
with an initial molar ratio of 5 except that the demand seemed to stabilize
at about 4.5 with some residual chlorine left in the solution after about six
hours reaction.  However, continuing greater demand was shown with greater
molar ratios of chlorine to pyrrole, showing that additional oxidation was
still possible.

     The reactivity of pyrrole with aqueous chlorine was particularly
important because of the relation of pyrrole to porphyrins (such as chloro-
phyll and heme) , the essential amino acid tryptophane, and other decomposition
products of proteins (such as indole and indole derivatives) .  Tryptophane
and indole, both of which contain pyrrole rings, exerted significant chlorine
demands.  A third nitrogen heterocycle, proline, having a pyrrolidine
structure, also exhibited a high chlorine demand.

     The results so far point to considerable destructive oxidation of pyrrole
by aqueous chlorine that. overshadows possible chloramine formation.  The
spectra show the formation of absorptive intermediates, some of which may be
chlorinated.  It seems likely that pyrrole may be a source of volatile
chlorinated organic compounds like chloroform.
Tryptophane, C
     Tryptophane is an amino acid of interest because it contains both a
pyrrolic-N and a primary amino-N.  The pyrrole function appears to take
precedence, for the immediate molar chlorine demand of tryptophane solutions
is greater than 3 and significant residual chlorine does not last for much
more than 2 hours even at an initial molar ratio of chlorine to tryptophane
equal to 8.  There is some indication that the demand for 10" 5M solutions
over 24 hours may be approximately 12.

     Quantitative results for the initial molar ratio equal to 8, with
4 x 10~"*M chlorine and  5 x 10~5M  tryptophane, were:

          time, hr.   0.1   1.0   2.0   7     7.2
          demand      4.2   7.1   7.6   7.8   8.0

     Spectrophotometric observations on the reaction mixture with the 8:1
molar ratio indicated a complex  reaction picture.  Initially the tryptophane
absorption peak near 280 nm was  replaced by a stronger absorption band with
maximum near 265 nm.  Then this  band was superseded over a period of about 30
minutes by another with a maximum near 240 nm.  The intensity of this last
absorption continued increasing  for at least 5 hours and a small secondary
peak with maximum near 330 nm also developed.  A visible yellow color also
appeared in the solution after about 2 hours.

     It appears probable  that there is extensive reaction with  the pyrrolic
ring at least and that volatile  chlorinated products may be formed as with
pyrrole itself .
                                     211

-------
Barbituric Acid—
     The reaction of aqueous chlorine with barbituric acid was studied with a
6:1 molar ratio of chlorine to barbiturate at lO"1**! concentration.

     There was a rapid initial demand of 2.0 moles of chlorine per mole of
babiturate that was accompanied by a substantially complete disappearance of
the barbiturate absorption maximum at 250-260 nm.  Substituted for the
absorption maximum was a generally increasing absorption toward shorter wave
lengths.  This general absorption then decreased slowly with increasing
reaction time.  The results imply a rapid partial reaction with all the
barbiturate rather than a more extensive reaction with some of it.

     The molar chlorine demand increased slowly with increasing time of
reaction from 2.8 to 75 minutes to 4.3 at 27 hours.


Caffeine—
     This purine differs from the barbiturate in that the pyrimidine nitrogens
are fully methylated and there are no methylene hydrogens alpha to carbonyl
groups as potential chlorination sites.  As a result very little reaction
with chlorine was observed.  In a mixture of 2 x 10~"*M chlorine with   .5x10" M
caffeine the chlorine decreased only to  1.7x10""* over a period of 67 hours.
Correspondingly the absorption spectrum for caffeine with its maximum at
273 nm changed only slightly.  There was a slight general decrease in ab-
sorption over the 67 hour period, perhaps corresponding to the slight
reduction observed in the chlorine concentration.

£-Dymethylaminobenzaldehyde—
     This substance, like the previous one, is not of direct, primary concern.
It happened to be available as a representative of a para-substituted aromatic
derivative and a structural analog of p-aminobenzoate.

     In the one run with this compound, at a molar ratio of 4, there was an
initial molar demand about 0.6 that  increased to 1.5 over 10 minutes, to
about 2.0 after 2 hours, to 3.0 after 6 hours and eventually to 4.0 after
55 hours.

     Spectrophotometrically there was an initial shift  in absorption  from  a
peak at 340 nm to one at 315 nm and  from one at  245 nm  to a broad maximum
centered near 233 nm that was complete  in  10 minutes.   Subsequently,  the
absorption remained substantially constant for  about 4  hours followed by a
slow uniform decrease  in intensity across  the spectrum  for the duration of
the experiment.

Cytosine—
     One series of  studies was carried  out  in which  fairly concentrated
solutions of cytosine were mixed with portions  of  aqueous  chlorine,  the molar
ratios  of chlorine  to  cytosine ranging  from  less than one  to  several  fold.
After overnight reaction  the  solutions  were  evaporated  under vacuum  and  the
concentrated residues were  subjected to thin-layer  chromatography.  When  the
chromatographs were developed  by  spraying  with  starch-iodide  solution, blue
spots appeared indicating  the  presence  of  oxidizing  species  (presumably


                                      212

-------
N-chloro compounds) of good stability in the treated solutions and evaporated
residues.  When the molar chlorine to cytosine ratio was less than one, only
a single spot appeared, at the same distance from the origin for all samples.
When the ratio was greater than one, multiple spots appeared, at different
distances and having different intensities depending on the initial ratio.
The formation of a number of N-chloro derivatives or decomposition products
of cytosine is clearly indicated.

     Generally speaking the demands exhibited by the amino acids and related
compounds can be accounted for semi-quantitatively as an oxidative hydrolysis
of N-chlorinated amine groups, followed by breakpoint oxidation of the re-
leased ammoniacal-N to nitrogen gas.  The greater part of the demand is
therefore attributable to oxidation of nitrogen rather than oxidation or
substitution on carbon by the aqueous chlorine.  Only when the demand exceeds
2.5 moles of chlorine per mole of compound is it likely that any general
oxidative breakdown of the organic compound has occurred.

     Three of the five compounds exhibiting molar demands much in excess of
2.5, pyrrole, indole and tryptophane, are structurally related in that all
possess the pyrrole ring.  It appears that the presence of this ring, which
is a component of such important natural products as porphyrin, chlorophyll
and hemoglobin, may provide a point of attack for general oxidation by aqueous
chlorine.  Even so, the demands shown do not represent complete oxidation to
CO2 and N2 .

     The strong demand exhibited by m-aminophenol, is noteworthy because of
its structural resemblance to resorcinol, in-dihydroxybenzene, which is known
to produce substantial chloroform when allowed to react with aqueous chlorine.

Initial Chlorine Demand

     Initial chlorine demand ratios (ICDR) defined as the chlorine demand
ratio determined for reaction times of approximately 30 seconds are shown in
Table 39.  It is easily seen that many organic compounds exert substantial
chlorine demand within a half a minute after mixing.

     Those compounds which exhibited high initial chlorine demands are
typically members of one of the following groups:  1. benzenoids with at
least one attached hydroxyl group (m-aminophenol); or  2. heterocyclic nitro-
genous compounds having a pyrrole or pyrrolidine structure (tryptophane,
indole and proline).

Long Term Chlorine Demand

     Several compounds were chosen for aqueous chlorination studies that
lasted a minimum of 20 hours.  Table 40 lists these compounds together with
highest chlorine demand observed after many hours of reaction with HOC1.

     Compounds that exhibited a high initial chlorine demand, such as trypto-
phane,  frequently underwent subsequent slow increase in chlorine demand over
time.   In the majority of experiments on compounds of this type, the greater
part of the total chlorine demand was exerted within the first 30 seconds or so of
reaction.

                                     213

-------
TABLE 39.
Compound
alanine
m-aminophenol
arabinose
arginine
aspartic acid
glutamic acid
indole
proline
tryptophane
COMPOUNDS SCREENED FOR INITIAL
Initial chlorine concentration
0.20
0.60
0.05
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
CHLORINE DEMAND
(mM) HOCl/Cpd3
2:1
6:1
5:1
2:1
3:1
1:1
4:1
3:1
4:1

ICDRb
c
ns
4.50
0.46
ns
ns
ns
1.04
2.93
2.90
 Cpd   =  the added initial molar concentration of compound in the reaction
          mixture

 ICDR  =  initial chlorine demand ratio
i
"ns    =  no significant chlorine demand (<0.25 ICDR)
        TABLE 40.   HIGHEST CHLOROFORM RATIOS OF SELECTED COMPOUNDS
Compound Initial Chlorine
Concentration (mM) "^-"-'^P0
alanine
m-aminophenol
arginine
aspartic acid
caffeine
creatinine
dime thy laminobenzaldehyde
glutamic acid
indole
phenylalanine
proline
pyrrole
tryptophane
0.20
0.80
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.05
0.04
0.20
0.40
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.40
4:1
8:1
4:1
4:1
2:1
5:1
4:1
4:1
8:1
4:1
4:1
13.9:1
8:1
Time
(hours)
72
41
72
72
67
29
33
72
31
67
72
24
72
CDR
1.73
7.18
2.56
3.50
0.62
3.28
3.80
2.05
7.40
3.87
2.76
12.67
8.00
                                    214

-------
 Chloroform Formation

      The  stoichiometry  of  chlorine  demand  as  it  relates  to  chloroform  form-
 ation shows that  each molecule  of chloroform  produced  reduces  the  theoretical
 chlorine  demand for oxidation to C02 and water by  one  molecule of  HOC1.
 Equations can  be  written for each chloroform-producing substance to give a
 maximum expected  stoichiometric or  theoretical chlorine  demand (TCD, noted
 by  underlined  values).  These are shown in Table 41.   Actual demand figures
 can approach these stoichiometric ones only if the rest  of  the organic
 compound  is oxidized fully to C02 and H2).  (The values  for the N-containing
 compounds are  somewhat  uncertain.   Breakpoint oxidation  to  N2  has  been
 assumed,  but if oxidation  proceeds  all the way to  NOT, then the theoretical
 figure  should  be  greater by 2.5 per N atom.)  When this  happens, there is no
 organic matter left in  the form of  additional chloroorganic compounds, except
 possibly  trichloroacetate  or hexachloroacetone.  In these circumstances the
 supposition that  substantial quantities of many  chloroorganic  substances
 besides chloroform have been produced is simply  not tenable.

      The  percent  theoretical chlorine demand  utilized  (%TCD) can be evaluated
 using equation (15) from the observed chlorine demand  ratio and the theore-
 tical chlorine demand ratio.


 % Theoretical  chlorine  demand _    observed chlorine demand ratio  (CDR)
           (% TCD)                theoretical  chlorine  demand ratio (TCDR) X

                                                                         (15)

      Chlorine  demand ratios (CDR),  % theoretical chlorine demand values
 (%TCD)  along with the highest concentration of chloroform produced during
 initial studies at pH 7.0  are shown in Table  42.   The  percent  molar yield of
 CHC13 is  defined by:

    %  Molar  Yield of CHCl^   =  "oles of chloroform  formed x
                        ->       moles of compound  used


 It  is noteworthy that in all the investigations  of  chloroform  formation the
 percent molar  yields were  not greater than  100%, even with  the most productive
 compounds under the most favorable  conditions.

      The  relationship between the percent molar yield of chloroform formed
 during  the  16:1 sample  run using tryptophane,  and  the associated chlorine-
 demand  ratio over a contact period  of about 8 hours is depicted in Figure 122.
 The percent molar yields and chlorine demand  ratios for  indole, a  degradation
 product of  tryptophane, exhibit a similar  relationship, but with markedly
 reduced molar yield of  chloroform as compared with  that of tryptophane.
 Figure  123  shows the results of chlorination  studies at pH 7 on indole and
 tryptophane with initial aqueous chlorine  concentrations of  1.0xlO~5M and
molar ratio or HOC1 to  compound equal to 10.

     Several nitrogenous organic compounds, including some with pyrrolic
 rings, are effective producers  of chloroform.   Detailed results with   5 x 10~6M
 tryptophane, generally  typical  of findings with  the other nitrogenous  compounds

                                     215

-------
        TABLE 41.  STOICHIOMETRIC EQUATIONS OF COMPOUNDS HAVING
                        CHLOROFORM FORMING POTENTIAL
Compound +
adenine:
W5
Alanine:
Cof-LNO-
372
4-amino antipvrine:
C11H13N3°
m-aminophenol :
CCH7NO
o /
arginine:
C6H14N4°2
aspartic acid:
C4H?N04
barbituric acid:
C4H4N2°3
caffeine:
81042
creatine:
C4H7N3°
cyanuric acid:
C3H3N3°3
cytosine:
C.Hj-N^O
HOC1 ->

11.5
6.5



26.5

13.5

11

6.5

6

Ii

9.5

3.5

8.5
CHC13 H

1
1



1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1
f- C02 H

4
2



10

5

5

3

3

7

3

2

3
h H20

3.5
4.5



7.5

4.5

7

4.5

3

6

4.5

2.5

3.5
+ HC1 +

8.5
3.5



23.5

10.5

12

3.5

3

15

6.5

0.5

5.5
N2

2.5
0.5



1.5

0.5

2

0.5

1.0

2.0

1.5

1.5

1.5
p-dimethyl ami nobenzal dehye :
C9HnNO
glutamic acid:
C5HgN04
21.5

9.5
1

1
8

4
6.5

5.5
18.5

6.5
2.5

0.5
aNumber represents moles required  for  balancing  equations.

                                     216
                                                            (continued)

-------
TABLE 41 (continued)
Compound +
glycylaglycine:
C4H8N2°3
histidine:
C6H9N3°2
L-hydroxyproline:
C5H9M03
indole:
CfiH7N
phenylalanine:
C9H11N02
proline:
C5HgN02
purine:'
C5H4N4
pyrrole:
C4H5N
sarcosine:
C3H7N02
thymine:
C5H6N2°2
tryptophane:
C11H12N2°2
tyro sine:
C9H11N03
uracil:
C4H4N2°2
uric acid
R A A Q
HOC1 H

8

13.5

10.5

1G.5

20.5


11.5

11

9.5

6.5

12.

25_

19.5

T_

8
" CHC13 H

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1
* C02 H

3

5

4

7

8

4

4

3

2

4

10

8

3

4
i- H20

5

5.5

5.5

4.5

6.5

5.5

3

3.5

4.5

4

7

6.5

3

3
+ HC1 +

5.0

10.5

7.5

15.5

17.5

8.5

8

6.5

3.5

7

22

16.5

4

5
M?

1.0

1.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

2.0

0.5

0.5

1.0

1.0

0.5

1

2
         217

-------
   TABLE 42.   HIGHEST CONCENTRATION OF CHLOROFORM PRODUCED DURING INITIAL
                   CHLOROFORM PRODUCTION STUDIES  AT pH  7a
Compound
adenine
alanine
m-aminophenol
barbituric acid
caffeine
chlorophyll
creatinine
cytosine
L-hydroxyproline
(pH 10.5)
indole
phenylalanine
proline
purine
pyrrole
thymine
tryptophane
(pH 7.5)e
tyrosine
uracil
uric acid
Time
(hours)
4.0
25
3.8
4.4
3.3
4.0
3.7
5.0
98
98
25
24
3.7
2.8
0.3
3.4
24
7.0
4
0.7
2.0
Chlorine Theoretical
Demand Demand Ratio
Ratio (Equation 15)
5.7
3.0
4.6
4.3
1.8

1.2
3.6
8.5
8.5
8.5
2.5
1.6
.7
3.1
5.4
10.0
13.4
9.0
4.3
6.1
50
46
34
72
10

16
42
81
81
46
12
14
6
33
54
40
54
46
61
76
Molar Yield
CHC1, (%)
J
b
ns
1.0
ns
1.4
ns
10 yg/1
0.5
0.5
6.9
37.2
4.9
1.1
0.6
ns
0.7
0.5
7.8
17.9
ns
0.6
ns
 Initial chlorine concentration of
 except where noted.
9.0xio~5M  and  HOCl/Cpd  ratio  of  9:1
 ns = less than 0.5% molar yield of CHC13
CInitial chlorine concentration  20x 10~*M; HOCl/Cpd =10:1
 Initial chlorine concentration  10 x 10~5M; HOCl/Cpd = 10:1
elnitial chlorine concentration  12 x10~5M; HOCl/Cpd = 12:1
                                     218

-------
ro
                                                                                            •14
                                                       hours
           Figure  122.   Chlorination  of  tryptophane,  pH.  7.5.   Solid  line,  chloroform formed;  dashed
                        line, molar chlorine  demand ratio.   Initial tryptophane,  0.50xio~5M;
                        initial  aqueous  chlorine,  8 x 10~5M (5.7  mg/1).

-------
N5
M
O
                   200
                    160
                CHCI.
              (In ug/D
                    80
                    40
                         pH=7
      t
Tryptophane

    10-1

  Indole
     I
                                                     hours
                                        •tt
                                                                                            C.D.R.
                                                                                            1.5
          Figure 123.  Chlorination of tryptophane and indole,  pH 7.   Solid  lines, chloroform formed;
                      dashed lines, molar chlorine demand ratio.   Initial  tryptophane, 1.0*10  M;
                      initial aqueous chlorine, l.Oxlo^M (7.1 mg/1).   Initial  indole, 1.0xlQ~5M;
                      initial aqueous chlorine, 1.0xlQ~1*M (7.1 mg/1).

-------
are depicted in Figure 124.  An increased chloroform production resulting
from increases in the ratio of the chlorine to tryptophane applied was
observed.  Pyrrole and L-hydroxyproline exhibited similar behavior.

     Perhaps most interesting of all were the results with chlorophyll.
"Soluble" chlorophyll at a nominal concentration of 1.7 mg per 1 (the
material was an aqueous paste with solids contents unknown) was mixed with
5.7xlO-"M (40 mg per 1) of aqueous chlorine at pH 5.8, 6.6, 7.0, 9.2 and
10.0 and allowed to stand for about 100 hours.  The chloroform produced, in
Ug per 1, was found to be 12, 32, 56, 260 and 230, respectively.  A plot of
the chloroform produced as a function of pH is shown in Figure 125.

     The fact that chlorophyll, even if only at elevated pH, was able to
produce such substantial quantities of chloroform is strongly suggestive
that algae as well as fulvates may be sources of haloforms in the treatment
of water supplies.

Effects of pH Alteration

     One of the most significant findings of these studies was the increased
yields of chloroform obtained when reaction mixtures were made alkaline an
hour or two before analyses for chloroform were performed.  Since these
increases were observed without significant changes in chlorine consumption
and in some instances even when solutions had been dechlorinated prior to
pH change, they are strongly indicative of the presence of intermediate
chlorinated compounds like trichloroacetate that require alkaline conditions
for hydrolysis.

     Examples of the results obtained are shown in Figures 126 through 130
for a number of different nitrogenous compounds.

     Results for proline are shown in Figure 126 along with values of the
molar chlorine-demand ratio at the time of the chloroform determinations.
Although increasing the pH produced some increased chlorine demand, the
final value was the same for the region pH 9 to 11, the region in which the
great increase in yield of chloroform occurred.  This was indicative that
the greater chloroform production at higher pH was not a result of greater
chlorination.

     Detailed results for tryptophane are depicted in Figure 127.  Perhaps
the most remarkable feature in this experiment was the occurrence of 100%
molar yield of CHCla near pH 11.  This is to be compared with a maximum
observed yield of 18% in the studies at pH 7.5.  It becomes clear, once
again, that chlorination to intermediate products occurs during the reaction
period in neutral or mildly acidic solutions, with CHCla being liberated by
hydrolysis when the pH is raised.

     Chlorination reactions with parallel samples of tryptophane and indole
conducted over a period of 28 hours at pH 6 yield considerably different
molar percentages of chloroform, about 14% for tryptophane and 3% for indole.
This is shown by Figure 128.  After the 28 hours of contact, the pH of each
sample was sequentially increased by addition of increments of sodium


                                    221

-------
                100i
TRYPTOPHAN
                                               20:1
                80-
             ug/l
             CHCI
NJ
N>
S3
                 40
                                                                                       18
                                                                  12
                                                                   %
                                                                  molr.r
                                                                  yield
                                                                  CHCL
                                                                                       -6
                             80
                 160
                                                 minutes
360
440
                                                                                       0
           Figure 124.  Chlorination of  tryptophane, pH 7.5.   Initial tryptophane concentration,
                       0.50x_lO~5M;  initial chlorine concentrations, 6.0xiQ~5M (4.3 mg per  1),
                       8x10 5M (5.7 mg per 1), 1.0 x lO'^M (7.1 mg per 1).

-------
     275
     200-

 ug/i
 CHCU
     100^
            CHLOROPHYLL
                1.7
              CHLORINE
               4 0.0m o/|
                                           -IOO hours
                                                 9
11
Figure 125.  Chlorination of chlorophyll at  varied pH.  Initial  chlorophyll
            concentration (nominal), 1.7 mg per 1; initial chlorine,
            5.7x10" M (40 mg per 1).  pH values, 5.8, 6.6,  7.0, 9.2, 10.0.
            Chlorine demand after 100 hours 36 mg per 1 in all  solutions.
                                  223

-------
       16
       14
    Cl
  demand
   rntio

       12
PROLINE
 16.5:1
Figure 126.  Yields of CHCla from proline with PH change.   Solid line,  chloroform yield;
             dashed line,  molar chlorine-demand ratio.   Initial proline concentration,
             2.0x10  M;  initial aqueous chlorine,  3.3x10"^ (23 mg per 1).   pH at 6.'?
             for 21 hours,  then separate samples increased in about 0.5 pH unit steps
             with greatest  pH at 11.   Chloroform and residual chlorine determinations

-------
     2.4
     1.8


  mg/l
     0-6
           TRYPTOPHANE
              25.2:1
100
75
  c/
  10
   0
molar
yield
CHCL
25
                                    ,H
                                                                 11
Figure 127.   Yields  of  chloroform from tryptophane with pH change.   Initial
             tryptophane  concentration, 2.0*10  M; initial aqueous chlorine,
             5.04xlO~'tM  (36 mg/l).  pH at 5.4 for 45 hours, then separate
             samples  increased  in pH in 0.5 unit step with greatest pH near
             11.   Chloroform determinations at 47 hours.
                                   225

-------
         14

         12


         10

Molar Yield
   CHCI3
          6
               PH-6
                    Tryptophane
                       37.5:1
                              8
                                      hours
                                                    20     24
28
Figure 128.   Chlorination of tryptophane  and  indole,  pH  6.   Initial
             tryptophane, 1.0 x 10~5M;  initial aqueous chlorine,  3.75x10"^
             (26.5 mg/1).  Initial indole,  1.0xlCT5M; initial aqueous
             chlorine,  2.85x10-^1 (20.2  mg/1).
                                   226

-------
               30
      Molar Yield
        CHCL
               20
               10
                                Tryptophane
                                Indole
                S5
                                       PH
                                              9
                                                              11
Figure 129.  Yields of chloroform from tryptophane and indole with pH
             change.  Yields of chloroform from tryptophane and indole with
             pH change after reduction of residual chlorine with thiosulfate
             after 28 hours at pH 6.   Initial tryptophane,  1x1(T5M;  initial
             aqueous chlorine 3.75xi0-*M (26.5 mg/1) .   Initial indole,
             IxlQ  M; initial aqueous chlorine,  2.85xio~'*M (20.2 mg/1).
                                   227

-------
   2.4
                                                                  100
         URACIL
          8.25:1
Figure 130.  Yields of chloroform from uracil with pH change.   Initial
             uracil concentration, 2.0*10~5M; initial aqueous chlorine,
             1.65x10"^ (11.7 mg/1).   After reaction at pH 6.6 for 21
             hours virtually all chlorine reduced.  Separate samples
             increased in pH to a maximum of 10.6.  Chloroform determinations
             at 26 hours.
                                   228

-------
 hydroxide  after  removal of any remaining available chlorine by addition of
 sodium  thiosulfate.  Within minutes of each pH alteration the concentrations
 of  chloroform were determined.  The results, shown in Figure 129,  indicate
 the amount of chloroform obtained from indole does not significantly increase
 when pH is increased after dechlorination whereas that obtained from trypto-
 phane increases  greatly.  Since there was no available chlorine remaining
 to  provide additional chlorination, it appears that an intermediate was
 formed  at  pH 6 which hydrolyzed or decomposed to give chloroform when
 sufficient base  was added.  This observation is consistent with the inform-
 ation derived from the spectrophotometric studies.

     A  similar pattern was exhibited for the chlorination of uracil with pH
 change  presented in Figure 130.  Uracil had not previously been regarded as
 a significant chloroform producer based on studies near pH 7.  This experi-
 ment showed conclusively that extensive chlorination had occurred  during the
 reaction,  so that when the pH was increased, with virtually no residual
 available  chlorine present.  100% molar yield of chloroform was obtained.

     The study of L-hydroxyproline illustrates the differences resulting from
 different  pH values.  Parallel samples of L-hydroxyproline were prepared in
 different  buffer systems, one at neutral pH and the other at pH 10.5.  Each
 was then mixed with an equal volume of chlorine solution diluted with the
 same buffer as the L-hydroxyproline sample.  Shoftly after mixing, both
 solutions  exhibited similar chlorine demand and chlorine production.  However,
 after two  hours  had past, the alkaline sample showed a significantly greater
 chlorine demand  in addition to a more than forty-fold increase in  chloroform
 formation  as compared to that of the solution at neutral pH (see Figure 131).

     Results of chloroform production by L-hydroxyproline at various pH
values are shown below:

          L-hydroxyproline    2.0 x 10  M  ( 2.6 ppm)

          chlorine           55.5 x 10~5M  (39.3 ppm)
     Approximate time:   170 hours


   £H            Molar Yield of Chloroform     Observed Demand Ratio

 5-6 (  7.0)a           0.1% (  1.1%)              25.4 (25.9)
     (  8.2)                 (  2.4 )                   (26.1)
     (10-0)                 (110.0 )                   (26.1)    LI
 6.6 (10.0)           0.6  ( 96.8 )              25.9 (26.0)    f]
                                                   .      .
 7.0(10.0)            1.5  (89.4)              26.1 (26.1)
 9-2                  37.2                       26.0
10.0                  41.5                       25.9       y - 1

 Sodium hydroxide was added to the low pH samples fifteen to twenty hours be-
 fore chloroform determination was carried out at Lawrence.  In addition, the
 sample originally at the lowest pH was separated into four portions: the first
 was placed in a screw-capped vial without any alteration while each of the
 other three had sodium hydroxide added until pH values of 7.0, 8.2 and 10.0 were
 attained at which time they were placed in screw-capped vials for transport to
 Lawrence.

                                    229

-------
                          time, min.
Figure 131.  Production of chloroform (o)  and  chlorine demand ratio  (•)
             chlorination of 10 x 10~5M L-hydroxyproline with 9 x  10~5
             aqueous chlorine at pH 7 and  10.5 (chlorine demand ratio =
             moles of chlorine used/mole of  L-hydroxyproline added) .
                                      for
230

-------
      The  results  of  this  study  were very interesting.   As was the case in
 other compounds,  the main increase in chloroform production occurred between
 pH 7.0 and  pH 9.2.   However,  the  subsequent  increase,  that occurred between
 pH 9.2 and  pH 10.0,  was not  substantial.   This suggested that the chloroform
 production  tended to level off  at the higher pH values,  or perhaps, as in the
 case  of chlorophyll,  the  maximum  chloroform  yield was  reached prior to the
 highest pH.   Again,  the observed  demand  ratios were not  significantly
 different for any of the  original pH values.

      The  samples  which were  increased in pH  also produced rather  interesting
 results.  The first  sample,  pH  5.6 exhibited little increase in chloroform
 formation when raised to  pH  8.2.   Yet, when  the pH reached 10.0 the molar
 yield of  the  chloroform exceeded  100%.   Apparently,  a  very dramatic increase
 occurs at some point  between these two pH values.   Also,  the two  other
 samples which underwent pH adjustment showed significantly greater quantities
 of  chloroform formed  than the sample originally at pH  10.0.   The  changes  in
 demand ratios were negligible.  Additional nitrogenous compounds  which
 produced  considerable quantities  of  chloroform under alkaline conditions
 were  pyrrole  and  m-aminophenol.

      Pyrrole;     pyrrole     2.0xio~^M (1.3  ppm)
                  chlorine 25.0xio~5M (17.7  ppm)
     Approximate time:  24 hours
      £H

      5.7
      6.5
      7.5
      9.1
     10.0
Molar Yield of Chloroform

          0.2 %
          0.4
          0.5
          7.6
         30.0
         Observed Demand Ratio
12.0
11.9
11.9
12.0
12.0
                              H
     A significant increase in chloroform production occurred between pH  7.5
and pH 9.1 and again between pH 9.1 and pH 10.0.  However, it is quite
interesting to note that the demand ratios for all pH values were almost
identical.  This indicated the formation of an intermediate compound which,
at the lower pH values, did not readily convert to chloroform
     m-Aminophenol;   in-aminophenol
                      chlorine

     Approximate time:  150 hours
 2. Ox 10~i?M
37.0x10 ^M
                                  (2.2 ppm)
                                  (26.2 ppm)
      PH        Molar Yield of Chloroform

      4.4 (10.1)          3.4 % (17.8%)
      6.3 (10.1)          7.6   (12.5%)
      6.8 (10.1)         13.4   (16.2%)
      9.2                17.3
      9.9                30.8
         Observed Demand Ratio
              17.6 (17.6)
              17.6 (17.6)
              17.6 (17.6)
              17.7
              17.7
                             OH
                                    231

-------
      In  the  case  of  m-aminophenol,  the first  large  increase in chloroform
formation  occurred between pH 6.3 and  pH 6.8,  the next occurring between pH
9.2 and  pH 9.9  (Figure  132).   As observed previously, the difference among
the demand ratios was not  significant.   In addition, even after the acidic
samples  were raised  to  pH  10.1 their demand ratios  (determined by thiosulfate
titration  after gas  chromatography  analysis)  did not change.  On the other
hand,  the  amount  of  chloroform produced increased markedly.  This substanti-
ated  the previous hypothesis  that an intermediate was formed initially, but
its conversion  to chloroform  was inhibited due to the low pH of some of the
samples.   When  the pH values  were subsequently increased, the formation of
chloroform was  favored.  Also, the  lowest pH  sample produced the greatest
amount of  chloroform after the pH was  raised.   This might mean that formation
of the intermediate  (or  intermediates)  was favored  at the lowest pH value.

      A possible explanation for the striking  chloroform production of the
nitrogenous  compounds discussed is  that heterocyclic structures often react
in a  manner  similar  to  ketones (100).   The elevated pH results in rapid
tautomerism  to  the enol  form,  thus  allowing the reaction to proceed ana-
logously to  that  of  diketo compounds.   These  diketo compounds have been
known to produce  significant  amount of  chloroform when allowed to react with
aqueous  chlorine  (35).

      Although altering  the pH and concentrations can result in different
values of  chlorine demand  and quantities of chloroform formed, there are
other variables which can  also affect  these values.  Recent studies con-
ducted at  the Lawrence  Experiment Station on  chloroform concentrations in
Massachusetts drinking water  supplies  indicate that contact time is one such
important  parameter.  In this investigation all sample runs were carried out
over  a period of  several hours with demand and concentration of chloroform
being determined  periodically for extrapolation necessitated by time con-
straints on  the use  of  the equipment.   Other  variables, such as temperature,
were  not investigated in this study.


CONCLUSIONS

      A large number  of  naturally occurring nitrogenous compounds readily
reacted  with aqueous chlorine exerting  significant  chlorine demands.  The
groups of  compounds  found  to  be moderately to  highly reactive included:
benzoids containing  one  or more hydroxyl groups (in-aminophenol) , amino acids
(alanine,  tryptophane, proline and  L-hydroxyproline); structures containing
the pyrrole  ring  (indole,  pyrrole,  chlorophyll and  some amino acids already
mentioned);  pyrimidines  (cytosine,  uracil,  thymine  and barbituric acid);
and some purines  (adenine  and  uric  acid).   Not all  organic compounds that
exhibited  high chlorine  demand produced chloroform  as a product suggesting
either simple oxidation  or the formation of other chlorinated organic
compounds  which have so  far remained unidentified.  For those compounds which
did produce  chloroform  the chlorine demand did not  appear to be a very good
indication of the chloroform  producing  potential.   For chloroform producers,
increasing the pH had a  considerable influence on the quantity of chloroform
formed,  with maximum chloroform formation occurring between pH 8.5 and
pH 10.5.


                                    232

-------
          60
          50
 Molar Yield


    CHCL
          20
           10
              m-Aminophenol
             «       5       6       7               9        I'D       11
                                             pH
Figure 132.   Yields  of  chloroform  from m-aminophenol with pH change.  Initial

             m-aminophenol,  2 x 10~5M; initial aqueous chlorine, 3.3xlo~'*M
             (23 mg/1).   pH  at  4.3  for 41 hours, then pH increased.

             form determinations  at 67 hours.
Chloro-
                                   233

-------
Compounds that reacted with aqueous chlorine near pH 7 to yield chloroform
did not necessarily exhibit enhanced production of chloroform with increase
in pH.  Moreover, several  compounds that showed sharp increases in chloro-
form formation under alkaline  conditions also began to show decreases in
chloroform production with increasing pH values greater than about 10.  Thus,
aqueous chlorine reactions of  selected compounds (or raw waters) having pH
values greater than 10 can give misleading indications of the ultimate
capacity for formation of  chloroform.

     Some compounds that showed significant chloroform production only under
alkaline conditions generally  formed other chlorinated intermediates under
neutral or slightly acidic conditions.  These intermediates when subjected
to a higher pH, produced chloroform.  Samples for haloform should, there-
fore, be made alkaline to  pH 11 or greater and held at the pH for an hour
or so before haloform determinations.

     It seems possible that a  very simple technique for preliminary assess-
ment of the potential for  chloroform production in a water supply can be
obtained by determination  of the four to six-hour chlorine demand with enough
excess chlorine present to give a free residual chlorine of several milli-
grams per liter.
                                    234

-------
                                 REFERENCES
 1.   Fair, G.M., J.C. Geyer, and D.A. Okun.  Elements of Water Supply and
      Wastewater Disposal.  2nd ed. John Wiley, New York, 1971.  752 pp.

 2.   Guter, K.J., W.J. Cooper, and C.A. Sorber.  Evaluation of Existing
      Field Test Kits for Determining Free Chlorine Residuals in Aqueous
      Solutions.  J. Amer. Water Works Association, 66(l):38-43, Jan. 1974.

 3.   O'Brien, J.E., J.C. Morris, and J.N. Butler.  Equilibria in Aqueous
      Solutions of Chlorinated Isocyanurate.  In:  Chemistry of Water Supply,
      Treatment, and Distribution, A.J. Rubin, ed., Ann Arbor Science Publ.,
      Ann Arbor, MI., 1974.  pp. 333-358.

 4.   Palin, A.T.  A Study of the Chloro Derivatives of Ammonia and Related
      Compounds, with Special Reference to Their Formation in the Chlori-
      nation of Natural and Polluted Waters.  Water and Water Engineering,
      54(656):151-159,  Oct. 1950, 54(657):189-200, Nov. 1950, 54(658):248-
      256, Dec. 1950.

 5.   Wei, I.W., and J.C. Morris.  Dynamics of Breakpoint Chlorination. In:
      Chemistry of Water Supply, Treatment, and Distribution, A.J. Rubin, ed.,
      Ann Arbor Science Publ., Ann Arbor, MI, 1974.  pp. 297-332.

 6.   Thresh, J.C., J.F. Beale, and E.V. Suckling.  The Examination of Waters
      and Water Supplies.  7th ed. by E.W. Taylor.  Little, Brown and Company,
      Boston, MA, 1958.  841 pp.

 7.   Mason, W.P.  Examination of Water, Chemical and Bacteriological.  6th
      ed. rev. by A.M. Buswell.  John Wiley, New York, 1938.  230 pp.

 8.   Gould, J.P.  Evidence that Chlorination May Form Mutagens.  Chemical
      and Engineering News, 56(13):33, Marcy 27, 1978.

 9.   Syracuse Research Corporation, Life Sciences Division, Merrill Lane,
      University Heights, Syracuse, NY.  Fate of Cooling-Water Chlorination
      Products in the Aquatic Environment.  (Research Proposal submitted to
      Department of Energy), December 1977.

10.   Baum, B.M.  Formation of Chlorinated Organic Compounds in the Chlori-
      nation of Natural and Polluted Waters.  Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University,
      Cambridge, MA, 1978.  308 pp.
                                     235

-------
11.  Gardner, W.S., G.F.  Lee.   Gas  Chromatographic Procedure to Analyze
     Amino Acids  in Lake  Waters.  Environmental  Science and Technology,
     7(8):719-724, August,  1973.

12.  Peake, E., B.L. Baker,  and G.W. Hodgson.  Hydrogeochemistry of the
     Surface Waters of  the  Mackenzie River Drainage Basin, Canada.  II. The
     Contribution of Amino  Acids, Hydrocarbons,  and Chlorins to the Beaufort
     Sea by the Mackenzie River System.  Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta,
     36(8):867-883, August,  1972.

13.  Pocklington, R.  Determination of Nanomolar Quantities of Free Amino
     Acids Dissolved in North  Atlantic Ocean Waters.  Analytical Bio-
     chemistry, 45(2):403-421,  February, 1972.

14.  Georgiadis,  A.G.,  and  J.W. Coffey.  Single  Column Analysis of Amino
     Acids in Protein Hydrolysates  Utilizing the Fluorescamine Reaction.
     Analytical Biochem., 56(1):121-128, November, 1973.

15.  Frei, R.W.,  and J.F. Lawrence.  Fluorigenic Labelling in High-Speed
     Liquid Chromatography.  J. of  Chromatography, 83:321-330, August 29,
     1973.

16.  Roth, M., and A. Hampai.   Column Chromatography of Amino Acids with
     Fluorescence Detection. J. of  Chromatography, 83:353-356, August 29,1973.

17.  Ellis, J.P., Jr.,  and  J.B. Garcia, Jr.  Multi-Sample Quantification of
     Amino Acids  and Imino  Acids with a Single Analytical System.  J. of
     Chromatography, 59:321-327, 1971.

18.  Ellis, J.P., Jr.,  and  J.B. Garcia, Jr.  An  Accelerated Operation of a
     Three-Sample Amino Acid Analyzer.  J. of Chromatography, 87(2):419-424,
     December 19, 1973.

19.  McHugh, W.,  R.A. Sandmann, W.G. Haney, S.P. Sood, and D.P. Wittmer.
     Characterization of  Selected Fluorescamine-Amino Acid Reaction Products
     by High-Performance  Liquid Chromatography.  J. of Chromatography,
     124(2):376-380, September  15,  1976.

20.  Stein, S., P. Bohlen,  J.  Stone, W. Dairman, and S. Udenfriend.  Amino
     Acid Analysis with Fluorescamine at the Picomole Level.  Arichives of
     Biochemistry and Biophysics, 155(1):203-212, March, 1973.

21.  Hadzija, 0., and D.  Keglevic.  Simple Method for the Separation of Amino
     Acid, Amino  Sugars,  and Amino  Alcohols Related to the Peptidoglycan
     Components on a Standard Amino Acid Analyser.  J. of Chromatography,
     138(2):458-460, August  11, 1977.

22.  Bayer, E., E. Groin,  B. Kaltenegger, and R.  Uhmann.  Separation of Amino
     Acids by High Performance  Liquid Chromatography.  Analytical Chemistry,
     48(8):1106-1109, July,  1976.
                                    236

-------
23.  Liao, T.-H., G.W. Robinson, and J. Salnikow.   Use of Narrow-Bore
     Columns in Amino Acid Analysis.  Analytical Chemistry, 45(13):2286-2288,
     November, 1973.

24.  Weigele, M., S. DeBernardo, and W. Leimgruber.  Fluorometric Assay of
     Secondary Amino Acids.  Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communicat.
     50(2):352-356, January 23, 1973.

25.  Udenfriend, S., S. Stein, P. Bohlen, W. Dairman, W. Leimgruber, and M.
     Weigele.  Fluorescamine:  A Reagent for Assay of Amino Acids, Feptides,
     and Primary Amines in the Picomole Range.  Science, 178(4063):871-872,
     November 24, 1972.

26.  Katz, S., and W.W. Pitt, Jr.  A New Versatile and Sensitive Monitoring
     System for Liquid Chromatography:  Cerate Oxidation and Fluorescence
     Measurement.  Analytical Letters, 5(3):177-185, 1972.

27.  Pitt, W.W., Jr., R.L. Jolley, and C.D. Scott.  Determination of Trace
     Organics in Municipal Sewage Effluents and Natural Waters by High-
     Resolution Ion-Exchange Chromatography.  Environ. Science and Tech.
     9(12):1068-1072, November, 1975.

28.  Jolley, R.L., S. Katz, J.E. Mrochek, W.W. Pitt, Jr., and W.T. Rainey.
     Analyzing Organics in Dilute Aqueous Solutions.  Chemtech., 5(5):312-
     318, May, 1975.

29.  Jolley, R.L., and W.W. Pitt, Jr.  Nonvolatile Organics in Disinfected
     Wastewater Effluents:  Characterization by HPLC and GC/MS.  In:  Ab-
     stracts of papers, 173rd ACS National Meeting, New Orleans, LA, March
     20-25, 1977.  Amer. Chem. Soc. , Washington, D.C. , 1977. Keyword: ENVT082.

30.  Jolley, R.L.  Chlorination Effects on Organic Constituents in Effluents
     from Domestic Sanitary Sewage Treatment Plants.  ORNL-TM-4290, Oak Ridge
     National Lab., Oak Ridge, TN, October, 1973.   342 pp.

31.  Gehrs, C.W., L.D. Eyman, R.L.,  and J.E. Thompson.  Effects of Stable
     Chlorine-Containing Organics on Aquatic Environments.  Nature, 249(5458):
     675-676, June 14, 1974.

32.  Taras, M.J.  Effect of Free Residual Chlorination on Nitrogen Compounds
     in Water.  J. Amer. Water Works Assoc., 45(1):47-61, January, 1953.

33.  Culver, R.H.  The Reactions of  Chlorine with Glycine in Dilute Aqueous
     Solution.  Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University,  Cambridge, MA, 1955.  303pp.

34.  Friend, A.G.  Rates of N-Chlorination of Amino Acids.  Ph.D. Thesis,
     Harvard University, Cambridge,  MA, 1956.  217 pp.

35.  Rook, J.J.  Formation of Haloforms During Chlorination of Natural Waters.
     Water Treatment and Examination, 23:234-243,  1974.
                                    237

-------
36.  Bellar, T.A., J.J. Lichtenberg, and R.C. Kroner.  The Occurrence of
     Organohalides in Chlorinated Drinking Waters.  J. Amer. Water Works
     Assoc., 66(12):703-706, December, 1974.

37.  Morris, J.C.  Formation of Halogenated Organics by Chlorination of Water
     Supplies.  EPA-600/1-75-002, U.S. Environ. Protection Agency, Washington,
     D.C., March, 1975.  59 pp.

38.  Morris, J.C., and B. Baum.  Precursors and Mechanisms of Haloform
     Formation in the Chlorination of Water Supplies.  In:  Water Chlori-
     nation:  Environmental Impact and Health Effects, v. 2 R.L. Jolley, H.
     Gorchev, D. H. Hamilton,  Jr., eds.  Ann Arbor Science Publ., Ann Arbor,
     MI, 1978.  pp. 29-48.

39.  Standard Methods for the  Examination of Water and Wastewater.  14th ed.
     Prepared and published jointly by American Public Health Association-
     American Water Works Association-Water Pollution Control Federation,
     Washington, D.C., 1975.   1193 pp.

40.  Nicolson, N.J.  An Evaluation of the Methods for Determining Residual
     Chlorine in Water.  I. Free Chlorine.  Analyst,  90(1069):187-198,
     April,  1965.

41.  Palin,  A.T.  Water Disinfection—Chemical Aspects and  Analytical  Control.
     In:  Disinfection:  Water and Wastewater, J.D.  Johnson,  ed.  Ann  Arbor
     Science Publ., Ann Arbor, MI,  1975.  pp.  67-89.

42.  Bjorklund,  J.G.,  and M.C. Rand.  Determination  of Free Residual Chlorine
     in Water by Para-Aminodiethylaniline.   J. Amer.  Water  Works  Assoc.,
     60(3):606-617, May,  1968.

43.  Palin,  A.T.   The  Determination of  Free and  Combined Chlorine in Water by
     the  Use of  Diethyl-p-phenylene Diamine.   J.  Amer. Water Works  Assoc.,
     49(7):873-880, July,  1957.

44.  Standard Methods  for  the Examination of Water  and Wastewater.   13th ed.
     Prepared and published jointly by  American  Public Health Association-
     American Water Works  Association-Water Pollution Control Federation,
     Washington, D.C.,  1971.   874  pp.

45.  Connell, C.H.   Ortho-tolidine Titration Procedure for Measuring Chlorine
     Residuals.   J.  Amer.  Water Works Assoc., 39(3):209-219, March, 1947.

46.  Whittle, G.P.   Recent Advances in Determining Free  Chlorine.  In:  Pro-
     ceedings of the  National Specialty Conference on Disinfection, July 8-
     10,  1970,  at the University of Massachusetts at Amherst.  Amer.  Soc.  of
     Civil Engineers,  New Yor, 1971.   pp. 269-283.

 47.  Black, A.P., and G.P.  Whittle.  New Methods for the Colorimetric Deter-
     mination of Halogen Residuals.  Part II. Free and Total Chlorine.  J.
     Amer.  Water Works Assoc., 59(5):607-619, May, 1967.
                                     238

-------
48.  Sorber, C., W.  Cooper, and E.  Meier.   Selection of a Field Method for
     Free Available  Chlorine.   In:   Disinfection:  Water and Wastewater,
     J.D. Johnson, ed.   Ann Arbor Science Publ., Ann Arbor, MI, 1975.  pp. 91-
     112.

49.  Cooper, W.J., C.A.  Sorber, and E.P.  Meier.  A Rapid Specific Free
     Available Chlorine Test with Syringaldazine (FACTS).  J. Amer. Water
     Works Assoc., 67(l):34-39, January,  1975.

50.  Bauer, R.,  B.F. Phillips, and C.O. Rupe.  A Simple Test for Estimating
     Free Chlorine.   J.  Amer.  Water Works Assoc., 64(11):787-789, November,
     1972.

51.  Bauer, R.,  and  C.O. Rupe.  Use of Syringaldazine in a Photometric Method
     for Estimating Free Chlorine in Water.  Analytical Chemistry, 43(3):
     421-425, March, 1971.

52.  Morrow, J.J., and R.N. Roop.  Advances in Chlorine-Residual Analysis.
     J. Amer. Water Works Assoc., 67(4):184-186, April,  1975.

53.  Morrow, J.J.  Residual-Chlorine Determination with  Dual Polarizable
     Electrodes.  J. Amer. Water Works Assoc., 58(3):363-367, March, 1966.

54.  Marks, H.C., D.B. Williams, and G.U. Glasgow.  Determination of Residual
     Chlorine Compounds.  J. Amer. Water Works Assoc., 43(3):201-207, March,
     1951.

55.  Marks, H.C., R.R. Joiner, and F.B. Standskov.  Amperometric Titration of
     Residual Chlorine in Sewage.  Water and Sewage Works,  95(5):175-178,
     May, 1948.

56.  Marks, H.C., G.L. Bannister, J.R. Glass, and E. Herrigel.  Amperometric
     Methods in the Control of Water Chlorination.  Analytical Chemistry,
     (19(3):200-204, March, 1947.

57.  Marks, H.C., and J.R. Glass.  A New Method  of Determining Residual
     Chlorine.  J. Amer. Water Works Assoc., 34(8):1227-1240, August, 1942.

58.  Haller, J.F., and S.S. Listek.  Determination of  Chlorine Dioxide  and
     Other Active Chlorine Compounds in Water.   Analytical Chemistry,. 29(7):
     639-642, July, 1948.

59.  Johnson, J.D., and R. Overby.  Stabilized Neutral Orthotolidine, SNORT,
     Colormetric  Method for Chlorine.  Analytical  Chemistry, 41(13):1744-1750,
     November,  1969.

60.  Palin, A.T.  Determination  of Free Chlorine and of  Chloramine  in Water
     with 2.-Aminodimethylaniline.  Analyst,  70(831) :203-207, June,  1945.

61.  Granstrom, M.L.  The  Disproportionation of  Monochloramine.   Ph.D.  Thesis,
     Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 1954.   206 pp.
                                     239

-------
62.  Morris, J.C.  Kinetics of Reactions Between Aqueous Chlorine and Nitrogen
     Compounds.  In:  Principles and Applications of Water Chemistry, S.D.
     Faust and J.V. Hunter, eds.  John Wiley, New York, 1967.  pp. 23-53.

63.  Weil, I., and J.C. Morris.  Kinetic Studies on the Chlormaines.  I. The
     Rates of Formation of Monochloramine, N-Chlormethylamine and N-
     Chlordimethylamine.  J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 71(5):1664-1671, May, 1949.

64.  Feng, T.H.  Behavior of Organic Chloramines in Disinfection.  J. Water
     Pollution Control Federation, 38(4):614-628, April, 1966.

65.  Duursma, E.K., and P. Parsi.  Persistence of Total and  Combined Chlorine
     in Sea Water.  Netherlands J. of Sea  Research, 10(2):192-214, 1976.

66.  Meier, E.P., W.J. Cooper, and C.A.  Sorber.  Development of a Rapid
     Specific Free Available Chlorine Test with  Syringaldazine  (FACTS).
     TR 74-05, U.S. Army Medical Bioengineering  Research and Development
     Command, Aberdeen Proving Ground,  MD, May,  1974.   52  pp.

67.  Oldfield, L.F.,  and J.O'M. Bockris.   Reversible  Oxidation-Reduction
     Reactions of  Aromatic Amines.   J.  of  Phys.  Chem.,  55(7):1255-1274,  1951.

68.  Johnson, J.D.  Bromine  Residual Chemistry and  the  Halogen  Membrane
     Electrode.   DADA-17-72-C-2053,  U.S.  Army Medical Research  and  Develop-
     ment  Command, Washington, D.C.,  February, 1976.   134  pp.

69.  O'Brien, J.E., J.C. Morris,  and J.N.  Butler.   Equilibria  in  Aqueous
     Solutions of Chlorinated  Isocyanurate.   In:  Chemistry of  Water Supply,
     Treatment,  and Distribution,  A.J.  Rubin, ed.   Ann Arbor Science Publ.,
     Ann  Arbor,  MI,  1974.   Chapter 14.

70.  Pinsky,  M.L.,  and H.C.  Hu.   Determination of the Chloroisocyanurate
     Hydrolysis  Constants.   In:   Abstracts of Papers, 175th ACS National
     Meeting Anaheim, CA,  March 13-17,  1978.  Amer. Chem.  Soc., Washington,
     D.C., 1978.  Keyword:   ENVT048.

71.  Lomas,  P.D.R.  The Combined Residual Chlorine of Swimming Pool Waters.
     J.  Assoc.  of Public Analysts, 5(l):27-36,  1967.

72.  Water Quality Criteria Data Book.   Vol. 1:   Organic Chemical Pollution
      of  Freshwater.   E.P.A. Water Quality Office, Project No.  18010 DPV.
      December,  1970.

 73.   Environmental Protection Agency Interim Primary Drinking Water Regu-
      lations:  Control of Organic Chemical  Contaminants in  Drinking Water.
      In:   Federal Register, Part II, Thursday, February 9,  1978.

 74.   Kraybill, H.F., C.T. Helmes, and C.C.  Sigman.   Biomedical Aspects of
      Biorefractories in Water.  In:  Second Int. Symp. on Aquatic Pollutants,
      Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands, Sept.  26-28, 1977.
                                      240

-------
75.  Fogg, G.E., and D.F.  Westlake.  The Importance of Extracellular Products
     of Algae in Freshwater.   Verh. Internat. Verein Limnol.,  12:219, 1955.

76.  Whitton, B.A.  Extracellular Products of Blue Green Algae.  General
     Microbiology, 39:1, 1965.

77.  Thompson, B.C.  Trihalomethane Formation Potential of Algal Extra-
     cellular Products and Biomass.  M.S. Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic
     Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, Environmental Sciences
     and Engineering, March,  1978.

78.  Katz, S., W.W. Pitt,  and C.D. Scott.  The Determination of Stable Organic
     Compounds in Waste Effluents at Microgram Per Liter Levels by Automatic
     High-Resolution Ion Exchange Chromatography.  Water Research, 6:1029-
     1037, 1972.

79.  Scheiner, D.  Determination of Kjeldahl Nitrogen by Indophenol Method.
     Water Research, 10:31-36, 1976.

80.  Strickland, J.D.H., and  T.H. Parsons.  A Practical Handbook of Seawater
     Analysis.  Fisheries Research Board of Canada, Ottawa, 1972.

81.  Mague, T.H., and F.C. Mague.  A Simplified Procedure for Determination
     of Particulate Organic Nitrogen.   Scripps  Oceanographic  Institute.
      Unpublished  data.

82.  Felix, A.M., and P. Terkelson.  Determination of Hydroxyproline in
     Fluorometric Amine Acid  Analysis with Fluorescamine.  Analytical
     Biochemistry, 56:610-615, 1973.

83.  Stein, S., P. Bohlen, J. Stone, W. Dairman, and S. Udenfriend.  Amino
     Acid Analysis with Fluorescamine at the Picomole Level.  Archives
     Biochem. and Biophys., 155:203-213, 1973.

84.  Fluorescamine Product Information, Roche Diagnostics, Division of
     Hoffman-LaRoche Inc., Nutley, N.J.

85.  Novotny, M., M.L. Lee, and K.D. Bartle.  Some Analytical Aspects of the
     Chromatographic Headspace Concentration Method Using a Porous Polymer.
     Chromatographia, 7(7):333-338, July, 1974.

86.  Karger, B.L., M. Martin, and G. Guiochon.  Role of Column Parameters and
     Injection Volume on Detection Limits in Liquid Chromatography.  Ana-
     lytical Chemistry, 46(12):1640-1647, October, 1974.

87.  Junk, G.A., J.J. Richard, M.D. Grieser, D. Witiak, J.L. Witiak, M.D.
     Arguello, R. Vick, H.J.  Svec, J.S. Fritz, and G.V. Calder.  Use of
     Macroreticular Resins in the Analysis of Water for Trace Organic
     Contaminants.  Journal of Chromatography, 99:745-762, 1974.
                                    241

-------
  88.   Leenher,  J.A.,  and E.W.D. Malcolm.   Classification of  Organic  Solutes  in
       Water  by  Using  Macroreticular Resins.   Journal of  Research,  U.S.  Geolo-
       gical  Survey, 4(6):737-751,  December,  1976.

  89.   The  National Organic Monitoring Survey.   Technical Support Division,
       Office of Water Supply,  U.S.  E.P.A.,  1977.

  90.   Gould,  J.  Evidence That Chlorination May Form Mutagens.  Chemical and
       Engineering News,  March  27,  1978.   p.  33.

  91.   Rosen,  B.,  R. Rothman, and M.G.  Wright.   Miscoding Caused by 5-Fluoro-
       uracil.   Journal of Molecular Biology,  44(2):363-375,  14 September,
       1969.

  92.   Research  Proposal.  Fate of  Cooling-Water Chlorination Products in the
       Aquatic Environment.  Division of Biomedical  and Environmental Research,
       Department  of Energy, Washington, D.C.,  submitted  by Life Sciences Div.,
       Syracuse  Research  Corp., Merrill Lane,  Univ.  Heights,  Syracuse, NY,
       December  1970.

  93.   Dunn,  D.B.,  and J.D.  Smith.   Incorporation of Halogenated Pyrimidines
       into the  Deoxyribonucleic Acids  of  Bacterium  Coli  and  its Bacteriophages.
       Nature  174(4424):305-306, August 14,  1954.

  94.   Dunn,  D.B.,  and J.D.  Smith.   Effects of  5-Halogenated  Uracils on  the
       Growth of Escherichia Coli and Their  Incorporation into Deoxyribonucleic
       Acids.  Biochemistry  J.  67:494-506,  1957.

  95.   Roy-Burman,  P.   Analogs  of Nucleic  Acid  Components.  Springer-Verlag,
       New York, 1970.

  96.   Southworth,  G.R.,  and C.W. Gehrs.   Photolysis of 5-Chlorouracil in
       Natural Waters.  Water Research, 10:967-971,  1976.

  97.   Eyman, L.D., C.W.  Gehrs,  and  Beauchamp.   Sublethal Effect of 5-Chloro-
       uracil on Carp  (Cyprimus Carpio) Larvae.  J.  Fish. 'Res. Bd.  Canada,
       32(11) -.2227-2229,  1975.

  98.   Drinking  Water  Council Recommends on Organics.  Willing Water, Amer.
      Water Works  Assoc., November,  1978.  p.  6.

 99.   Cantor, K.P. and L.J. McCabe.  Epidemiologic  Studies on the Health
      Effects of Waterborne Carcinogens.  Presented to the Annual Meeting of
       the American Water Works Association, Atlantic  City, NJ, June 29, 1978.

100.  Hendrickson, J.B.  The Molecules of Nature.   W.A.  Benjamin and Company,
      Reading,  Massachusetts.   1973.
                                     242

-------
                               APPENDIX A
TABLE A-l.  RECOVERY OF CREATINE IN WATER AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH TENAX AND
               XAD-8 MACRORETICULAR RESINS (pH UNADJUSTED)
aliquot (ml)
influent (= 10 mg/L)
0-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
100-105
105-110
110-116
116-121
121-126
126-146
146-166
166-186
186-206
206-226
226-246
246-266
absorbance at 254 nma
0.600
0.033
0.035
0.064
0.109
0.157
0.204
0.257
0.308
0.360
0.405
0.450
0.468
0.491
0.510
0.535
0.542
0.550
0.553
0.568
0.575
0.568
0.581
0.578
0.585
0.581
0.582
0.581
0.595
% recovery
^
5.5
5.8
10.7
18.2
26.2
34.0
42.8
51.3
60.0
67.5
75.0
78.0
81.8
85.0
89.2
90.3
91.7
92.2
94.7
95.8
94.7
96.8
96.3
97.5
98.5
97.0
98.5
99.2
    1 cm pathlength
                                   243

-------
TABLE A-2.  RECOVERY OF URACIL IN WATER AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH TENAX AND
              XAD-8 MACRORETICULAR RESINS (pH UNADJUSTED)
aliqout (ml)
influent = 10 mg/L
0-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-91
91-96
96-101
101-106
106-111
111-116
116-121
121-126
126-152
152-177
177-202
202-227
302-326
absorbance at 254 nma
.715
.009
.026
.053
.147
.250
.364
.472
.510
.508
.629
.645
.659
—
.680
.681
.681
.690
.690
.692
.692
.692
.705
.725
.720
.715
.715
% recovery
—
1.3
3.6
7.4
20.6
35.0
50.9
66.0
71.3
71.1
88.0
90.2
92.2
—
95.1
95.2
95.2
96.5
96.5
96.8
96.8
96.8
98.6
101.4
101.7
100.0
100.0
     cm pathlength
                                  244

-------
TABLE A-3.  RECOVERY OF URACIL IN WATER AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8
               MACRORETICULAR RESIN (pH UNADJUSTED)
aliquot (ml)
Influent (= 10 mg/L)
0-20
20-25
25-31
31-36
36-41
41-46
46-51
51-56
56-62
62-67
67-72
72-77
77-82
82-87
87-92
92-97
97-102
102-107
107-122
112-117
117-122
122-147
147-172
297-322
*a
absorbance at 254 nm
.690
.018
.064
.126
.264
.330
.410
.480
.541
.569
.599
.612
.640
.649
.649
.655
.660
.662
.651
.651
.640
.672
.658
.678
.687
% recovery
—
2.6
9.3
18.3
38.3
47.8
59.4
69.6
78.4
82.5
86.8
88.7
92.8
94.1
94.1
94.9
95.7
95.9
94.4
94.4
92.8
97.4
95.4
98.3
98.3
  1 cm pathlength
                                 245

-------
TABLE A-4.  RECOVERY OF CREATININE IN WATER ADJUSTED TO pH 2.0 WITH HC1 AFTER
                  PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-2 AND XAD-4 RESINS
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-40
40-65
65-90
90-190
concentration (mg/L)
3.2
1.5
1.1
1.5
1.6
1.9
2.4
2.2
2.5
2.5
2.6
% recovery

47.7
34.6
47.1
49.0
58.2
75.8
68.6
74.5
80.0
81.0
   TABLE A-5.  RECOVERY OF CYTOSINE IN WATER AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-2
                XAD-4 MACRORETICULAR RESINS (pH UNADJUSTED)
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-50
75-100
175-200
concentration (mg/L)
8.6
0.7
0.4
0.9
2.0
5.3
5.4
7.1
7.5
% recovery
^
7.9
4.6
10.6
23.6
62.2
63.6
82.6
88.0
                                     246

-------
TABLE A-6.  RECOVERY OF CYTOSINE IN WATER ADJUSTED TO pH 2  WITH NITRIC ACID
               AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-2 AND XAD-4  RESINS
   aliquot (ml)              concentration  (mg/L)             %  recovery
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-40
40-65
65-90
165-190
8.3
1.1
1.4
2.6
5.3
4.9
5.4
6.5
7.2
7.3
7.6
.
13.4
11.0
31.2
63.0
59.1
64.6
77.4
85.8
87.5
90.8
     TABLE A-7.  RECOVERY OF INDOLE IN 10~3 NaOH AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH
                          XAD-2 AND XAD-4 RESINS
   aliquot (ml)               concentration  (mg/L)            % recovery
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-50
50-75
175-200
8.7
1.8
1.3
1.1
2.3
1.3
1.6
1.5
1.7

20.3
20.0
12.7
26.8
14.7
18.6
17.0
19.3
                                     247

-------
    TABLE A-8.  RECOVERY  OF INDOLE IN 10
                                        -3
                  M HNO.,  AFTER PASSAGE
THROUGH XAD-4  RESIN
aliquot (ml)
 concentration (mg/L)
                     %  recovery
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-55
55-80
125-150
190-215
        6.6
        0.4
        0
        0.3
        0.
        0.
        0.
        0,
        0
        0,
        0.
.1
.1
.1
6.1
0
4.4
0.9
0.9
1.7
1.3
0
4.8
4.8
                                248

-------
TABLE A-9.  RECOVERY OF CYTOSINE IN WATER AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND
                      TENAX RESINS (pH UNADJUSTED)
aliquot (ml)
influent (= 10 mg/L)
0-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-56
56-61
61-66
66-71
71-76
76-81
81-86
86-91
91-96
96-101
101-106
106-111
111-116
116-121
121-126
126-146
146-166
166-186
186-206
206-226
267-287
absorbance at 233 run3
.435
.170
.090
.111
.161
.195
.236
.262
.290
.323
.335
.353
.365
.380
.387
.392
.408
.412
.414
.414
.418
.413
.403
.412
.416
.416
.418
.418
% recovery

39.1
20.7
25.5
37.0
44.8
54.3
60.2
66.6
74.3
77.0
81.2
83.9
87.4
89.0
90.0
93.8
94.7
95.2
95.2
96.1
92.6
92.6
94.7
95.6
95.6
96.1
96.1
  al cm pathlength
                                  249

-------
TABLE A-10.  RECOVERY OF HUMIC ACID SOLUTION (pH 2.0) AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH
                   XAD-8 AND TENAX MACRORETICULAR RESINS
volume eluted
(ml)
influent
0-25
50-75
75-100
100-125
125-175
175-275
275-375
375-474
474-545
absorbance
at 330 run
0.322
0.070
0.046
0.050
0.050
0.053
0.077
0.090
0.190
0.116
concentration
(mg/L)
13.5
2.9
1.9
2.1
2.1
2.2
3.2
3.8
4.6
4.9
% recovery
.
21.7
14.3
15.6
15.5
16.5
23.9
28.0
33.9
36.0
    1 cm  pathlength
                                    250

-------
TABLE A-ll.  RECOVERY OF HUMIC ACID SOLUTION ADJUSTED TO pH 11.7
  AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX MACRORETICULAR RESINS
volume eluted
(ml)
Influent
0-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
100-110
110-120
120-145
145-170
170-195
195-370
absorbance
at 330 nma
0.438
-
.102
.104
.164
.185
.191
.204
.228
.246
.265
.278
.288
.295
.307
.318
.323
.331
.350
.363
.374
.368
.385
concentration
(mg/L)
18.3
-
4.3
4.4
6.9
7.8
8.0
8.5
9.6
10.3
11.1
11.6
12.1
12.4
12.9
13.3
13.5
13.9
14.7
15.2
15.7
15.4
16.1
% recovery
_
-
23.3
23.7
47.4
42.4
43.6
46.6
52.1
56.2
60.5
63.5
65.8
67.4
70.1
72.6
73.7
75.6
79.8
82.9
85.4
84.0
87.9
 1 cm pathlength
                               251

-------
TABLE A-12.  RECOVERY OF TRYPTOPHAN IN WATER ADJUSTED TO pH 2.0 WITH
     HYDROCHLORIC ACID AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX GC
                        MACRORETICULAR RESINS
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-250
250-300
300-350
350-400
concentration (ng/L)
9.7
0.2
0.3
0.5
0.7
1.1
1.5
2.1
2.7
3.2
3.6
3.9
4.2
4.6
4.8
5.1
5.3
5.5
5.9
6.0
6.1
6.5
7.6
7.9
8.2
8.5
8.7
8.8
8.9
% recovery
—
2.4
2.7
5.4
7.1
10.9
16.0
21.8
27.9
32.7
37.4
40.5
43.9
48.0
49.7
53.1
54.4
57.1
60.5
61.6
63.6
67.7
78.9
81.6
84.8
87.8
89.8
91.5
92.5
                                 252

-------
   TABLE A-13.  RECOVERY OF TRYPTOPHAN IN WATER ADJUSTED TO pH 6.9 WITH
NaOH AND HC1 AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX GC MACRORETICULAR RESINS
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-250
250-300
300-350
350-400
a
absorbance at 278 run (A.U.)
0.365b
0.041
0.130
0.190
0.218
0.241
0.275
0.290
0.310
0.320
0.330
0.335
0.340
0.345
0.348
0.350
0.354
0.353
0.353
0.358
0.360
0.352
0.360
0.361
0.361
0.359
0.362
0.363
0.365
% recovery
—
11.2
35.6
52.1
59.7
66.0
75.3
79.5
84.9
87.7
90.4
91.8
93.2
94.5
95.3
95.9
97.0
96.7
96.7
98.1
98.6
96.4
98.6
98.9
98.9
98.4
99.2
99.5
100
   al cm pathlength;  H20 reference

   b  influent concentration = 10 mg/L
                                    253

-------
TABLE A-14.  RECOVERY OF ADENINE IN WATER ADJUSTED TO pH 2.5 WITH
      HYDROCHLORIC ACID AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX GC
                      MACRORETICULAR RESINS
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-250
250-300
300-350
concentration (mg/L)
9.54
0.5
2.1
3.6
4.4
5.1
5.7
6.2
6.8
7.2
7.5
7.8
8.1
8.2
8.3
8.4
8.5
8.7
8.7
8.9
8.9
9.0
9.2
9.4
9.3
9.3
9.4
9.4
% recovery

5.0
21.8
37.6
45.8
53.1
59.3
64.6
70.9
75.0
78.1
81.2
84.4
85.4
86.5
88.5
89.5
91.1
91.6
93.7
93.7
94.8
96.9
99.0
97.9
97.9
99.0
99.0
                               254

-------
TABLE A-15.  RECOVERY OF ADENINE IN WATER ADJUSTED TO pH 7.1 WITH NaOH
           AND HC1 AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX GC
                         MACRORETICULAR RESINS
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-250
250-300
300-350
350-400
concentration (mg/L)
9.6
0.0
1.0
2.5
3.7
4.4
5.1
5.9
6.4
6.9
7.4
7.5
7.6
7.8
8.1
8.3
8.5
8.7
8.8
8.9
8.9
8.9
9.3
9.4
9.4
9.3
9.5
9.6
9.6
% recovery

0.3
10.6
25.7
37.9
46.1
53.1
60.8
66.0
71.7
76.3
77.3
78.4
80.4
83.5
86.6
88.7
90.2
91.8
92.8
92.8
72.8
96.9
97.9
97.9
96.9
99.0
100
100
                                 255

-------
TABLE A-16.  RECOVERY OF 5-CHLOROURACIL IN WATER ADJUSTED TO pH 2.0 WITH
       HYDROCHLORIC ACID AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH CAD-8 AND TENAX GC
                          MACRORETICULAR RESINS
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-250
250-300
300-350
350-400
concentration (mg/L)
9.7
0.2
1.2
3.1
3.5
3.9
4.4
5.0
5.6
6.3
6.8
7.3
7.7
8.0
8.2
8.4
8.6
8.8
8.9
8.9
9.0
9.2
9.5
9.5
9.7
9.7
9.7
9.7
9.7
% recovery

2.3
16.0
31.9
36.5
40.0
45.2
51.7
58.1
65.0
70.4
75.4
79.2
82.3
84.2
86.5
88.7
90.2
91.5
92.3
93.1
94.4
97.7
98.5
100
99.6
100
100
100
                                   256

-------
TABLE A-17.
RECOVERY OF 5-CHLOROURACIL IN WATER ADJUSTED TO pH 7.01 WITH NaOH
AND HC1 AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX GC
              MACRORETICULAR RESINS
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
95-90
90-95
95-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-250
250-300
300-350
350-400
concentration (mg/L)
10.4
0.5
2.0
3.5
4.7
5.5
6.3
7.1
7.7
8.2
8.6
8.9
9.1
9.3
9.5
9.6
9.6
9.7
9.9
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.3
10.3
10.4
10.2
10.3
10.3
10.4
% recovery
—
4.5
18.9
33.2
44.6
52.9
60.7
67.9
74.1
78.7
82.1
89.8
87.5
89.3
91.1
92.0
92.6
92.9
94.6
94.6
95.5
95.5
98.2
99.1
99.6
97.3
99.1
99.1
100
                                    257

-------
TABLE A-18.  RECOVERY OF SUCCINIMIDE IN WATER ADJUSTED TO  pH  2.0 WITH
     HYDROCHLORIC ACID AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX  GC
                        MACRORETICULAR RESINS
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
60-70
70-80
80-90
90-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-250
250-300
300-350
350-400
absorbance at 215 run (A.U.)a
1.000b
0.127
0.196
0.245
0.318
0.383
0.435
0.470
0.540
0.550
0.590
0.620
0.690
0.780
0.810
0.860
0.920
0.920
0.930
% recovery

12.7
19.6
24.5
31.8
38.3
43.5
47.0
54.0
55.0
59.0
62.0
69.0
78.0
81.0
86.0
92.0
92.0
93.0
   4 cm pathlength; H-0 reference

   influent concentration = 30 mg/L
                                258

-------
TABLE A-19.  RECOVERY OF SUCCINIMIDE IN WATER ADJUSTED TO pH 7.05 WITH
         NaOH AND HC1 AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX GC
                         MACRORETICULAR RESINS
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-10
10-20
20-30
30-40
40-50
50-60
60-70
70-80
80-90
90-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-250
250-300
300-350
350-400
concentration (mg/L)
29.5
7.0
11.6
15.5
18.8
21.0
22.7
23.8
24.2
25.1
25.9
25.9
26.7
27.3
27.5
27.5
27.5
27.5
27.5
% recovery
—
23.8
39.5
52.6
63.8
71.2
77.0
80.8
82.2
84.9
87.7
87.7
90.4
92.6
93.2
93.2
93.2
93.2
93.2
                                  259

-------
TABLE A-20.  RECOVERY OF PURINE IN WATER ADJUSTED TO  pH  2.0 WITH
   HYDROCHLORIC ACID AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND  TENAX GC
                      MACRORETICULAR RESINS
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-250
250-300
'' a
absorbancc at 260 nm (A.U.)
0.550b
0.056
0.185
0.268
0.282
0.330
0.380
0.428
0.444
0.468
0.480
0.485
0.490
0.498
0.500
0.510
0.510
0.510
0.520
0.520
0.520
0.520
0.530
0.540
0.540
0.530
0.540
% recovery
_
10.2
33.6
48.7
51.3
60.0
69.1
77.8
80.7
85.1
87.3
88.2
89.1
90.6
90.9
92.7
92.7
92.7
94.6
94.6
94.6
94.6
96.4
98.2
98.2
96.4
98.2
  1 cm pathlength;  H-O reference

  Influent concentration = 10 mg/L
                               260

-------
TABLE A-21.  RECOVERY OF PURINE IN WATER ADJUSTED TO pH 7.02 WITH NaOH
           AND HC1 AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX GC
                         MACRORETICULAR RESINS
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-250
250-300
300-350
350-400
concentration (mg/L)
10.2
3.9
5.6
6.9
7.4
8.0
8.5
8.8
9.2
9.4
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.5
9.8
9.9
9.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.0
10.2
10.2
10.2
9.8
10.0
10.2
10.2
% recovery

38.4
55.1
67.7
72.6
77.9
82.6
85.8
89.8
91.3
92.9
93.7
94.4
94.4
96.0
96.8
96.8
97.6
97.6
97.6
99.9
97.6
99.2
99.2
100
96.0
99.9
99.9
99.9
                                 261

-------
TABLE A-22.  RECOVERY OF PYRIMIDINE IN WATER ADJUSTED TO  pH  2.0 WITH
     HYDROCHLORIC ACID AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX GC
                        MACRORETICULAR RESINS
aliquots (ml)
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-250
250-300
300-350
350-400
absorbance at 242 nm (A.U.)3
0.465b
0.002
0.055
0.104
0.137
0.182
0.222
0.257
0.282
0.305
0.320
0.338
0.349
0.359
0.369
0.373
0.381
0.380
0.380
0.390
0.390
0.399
0.410
0.418
0.485
0.480
0.440
0.440
0.440
% recovery
^
0.4
11.8
22.4
29.5
39.1
47.7
55.2
60.7
65.6
68.8
72.7
75.1
77.2
79.4
80.2
81.9
81.7
81.7
83.9
83.9
85.8
88.2
89.9
91.4
90.3
94.6
94.6
94.6
 a 1 cm pathlength; H20 reference

 k Influent concentration = 10 mg/L
                                 262

-------
TABLE A-23.
RECOVERY OF PYRIMIDINE IN WATER ADJUSTED TO pH 7.00 WITH NaOH
AND HC1 AFTER PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX GC
              MACRORETICULAR RESINS
aliquot (ml)
influent
0-5
5-10
10-15
15-20
20-25
25-30
30-35
35-40
40-45
45-50
50-55
55-60
60-65
65-70
70-75
75-80
80-85
85-90
90-95
95-100
100-125
125-150
150-175
175-200
200-250
250-300
300-350
350-400
concentration (mg/L)
9.8
0.6
1.8
3.3
4.4
5.4
6.0
6.7
7.4
7.8
8.1
8.4
8.7
8.9
9.0
9.1
9.2
9.3
9.4
9.4
9.4
9.4
9.6
9.5
9.6
9.5
9.6
9.7
9.7
% recovery
—
5.6
18.3
34.1
45.3
55.0
61.5
68.8
74.5
79.8
83.1
86.1
89.0
91.1
92.4
93.7
94.7
95.4
96.0
96.0
96.7
96.7
98.0
97.6
98.4
97.6
98.7
99.0
99.3
                                    263

-------
      TABLE A-24.
LEAST SQUARE EQUATIONS AND MOLAR EXTINCTION VALUES FOR SELECTED NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS
              DISSOLVED IN AMMONIA FREE WATER  (pH UNADJUSTED)
ro
compound
(X: pathlength
cm)
uracil (233:4)





uracll (254:1)





creatine (210:4)




creatine (233:4)
creatine (254:4)
concentration absorbance
mg/L M/L (A.U.)
1.0
2.5
5.0
10.0


1.0
2.5
5.0
10.0


1.0
2.5
5.0
10.0


10.0
10.0
8.92 x 10~!j
2.23 x 10 5
4.46 x 10~5
8.92 x 10


8.92 x 10~ij
2.23 x 10~5
4.46 x 10~5
8.92 x 10


6.71 x 10~!j
1.68 x 10*5
3.35 x 10~^
6.71 x 10


6.71 x 10~5
6.71 x 10"5
.079
.197
.398
.789


.067
.182
.343
.692


.077
.125
.295
.681


.039
.007
molar ' least square
extinction fit through
valueb origin0
2.214 x 103
2.179 x 10^
2.230 x 10.. concentration (mg/L) =
2.236 x 10 » 125.5 x absorbance
( X = 2.215 x 10 )
(/I2 = 25.6)
7.510 x-103
8.161 x 10-
7.689 x 10^ concentration (mg/L) •
7.757 x 10 144.4 x absorbance
( X = 7.779 x 103)
(^ = 274.9)
2.871 x 103
1.865 x 10
2.200 x 10;? concentration (mg/L) •
2.522 x 10 » 15.2 x absorbance
( X = 2.365 x 10 )
(^2 = 431.2)
1.454 x 102
2.610 x 101
                                                                               (continued)

-------
                                               TABLE A-24  (continued)
NJ
a*
Oi
compound
(A: pathlength concentration absorbance3
cm) mg/L M/L (A.U.)
cytosine (254:1) 1.0
2.0
4.0
5.0
10.0
20.0


creatinlne (254:1) 1.0
4.0
5.0
8.0
40.0


indole (254:1) 1.0
4.0
5.0
10.0
11.7
indole

9.0 x 10~^
1.8 x 10";?
3.6 x 10~i?
4.5 x 10"^
9.0 x 10"?
1.8 x 10"*


8.84 x 10"^
3.54 x 10~l
4.42 x 10~^
7.07 x 10":
3.54 x 10


8.54 x 10~*
3.42 x 10~|?
4.27 x 10~^
8.54 x 10~^
9.99 x 10


.010
.072
.161
.191
.458
.830


.007
.028
.043
.093
.530


.036
.125
.155
.334
.410


molar least square
extinction fit through
value b origin0
1.111 x 103
4.000 x 10^
4.472 x 103 concentration (mg/L) -
4.244 x 10 23.7 x absorbance
5.089 x 10,
4.611 x 10J
( X = 3.921 x 103)
(/s~2 = 1,424.8)
7.918 x 10*
7.918 x 10,
9.728 x 103
1.315 x 10, concentration (mg/L) «
1.499 x 10 76.2 x absorbance
( X = 1.074 x 10J)
(/s2 = 319.5)
4.217 x 103
3.661 x 10,
j
3.631 x 10 concentration (mg/L) »
3.912 x 10, 29.5 x absorbance
4.105 x 10J
( X = 3.905 x 103)
(Ss2 = 260.8)
                                                                                 (continued)

-------
                                               TABLE A-24  (continued)
Ni
a\
compound
(X: pathlength
cm)
humic acid (330:1)



tryptophan (278:1)






adenine (256:1)







succinimlde (215:4)


succinimide (215:4)



concentration absorbance3
mg/L M/L (A.U.)
1.0
4.0
9.9
19.8
1
2
3
5
10


1
2
3
5

10


1
2

3
5
10






4.896 x 10~5
9.793 x 10';?
1.469 x 10~^
2.448 x 10~^
4.896 x 10


7.400 x 10~\
1.480 x 10"^
2.220 x 10~*
3.700 x 10~^

7.400 x 10


1.009 x 10~^
2.018 x 10
.
3.028 x 10":
5.046 x 10~*
1.009 x 10


.027
.107
.236
.470
.034
.062
.101
.162
.295


.105
.209
.306
.510

1.000


0.013
0.034

0.045
0.058
'0.120


molar least square
extinction fit through
value- origin0




6.944
6.331
6.875
6.618
6.025
( X =
(•/s~2.=
1.419
1.412
1.378
1.378

1.351
( x =
(^2 =
3.220
4.213



concentration (mg/L) =
41.9 x absorbance
xlO3
x 10*
x 10-
x 10^ concentration (mg/L) »
x 10 _ 32.9 x absorbance
• 6.559 x 10J)
: 383.6)
xioj
x 10,
A
x 10, concentration (mg/L) «
x 10. 9.9 x absorbance
A
x 10
1.388 x 10 )
278.6)
x 10^
x 10
?
3.715 x 10"
2.873 ,x 10, concentration (rag/L) »
2.973
( x =
(*S ' —
x 10 7 80.8 x absorbance
3.399 x 10Z)
56.0) 	 ( continued ^

-------
                                                TABLE A-24  (continued)
ISJ
0«
compound
(X: pathlength
cm)
5-chlorouracll (272:





pyrimldine (242:1)






purine (260:1)



purine (260:1)

Q
a
concentration absorbance
mg/L M/L (AtU.)
1) 1
2
3
5
10


1
2
3
5
10


1
2
3
5
10


6.826 x 10~*
1.365 x 1Q~1
2.048 x IQ~1
3.413 x 10~f
6.862 x 10"4


1.249 x 10~*
2.497 x I0~l
3.746 x 10~i?
6.243 x 10"?
1.249 x 10


8.325 x 10~1?
1.665 x 10~^
2.498 x 10~j?
4.163 x 10
8.235 x 10"5


0.059
0.117
0.164
0.269
0.533


.031
.066
.103
0.156
0.305


0.064
0.126
0.197
0.311
0.616


molar least square
extinction fit through
value origin0
8.644 x lo!?
8.570 x 10,
8.009 x 10^
7.882 x 10_ concentration (mg/L) •
7.808 x 10 18.6 x absorbance
( X' = 8.183 x 10J)
(^"2 = 394.9)
2.483 x 103
2.643 x 10,
2.750 x 10^
2.499 x 10 concentration (mg/L) =
2.443 x 10 , 32.3 x absorbance
( X = 2.564 x 10 )
(/s2 = 128.7)
7.688 x 103
7.568 x 10^
7.888 x 10_ concentration (mg/L) -
7.471 x 10 16.1 x absorbance
7.399 x 103 .
( X = 7.6028 x 10 )
(/? = 192.8)
pathlength = 1 cm; absorbance read  against  water reference
    A(CJO   where A = absorbance; C = molar concentration; E = molar extinction value;
                  i = pathlength =  1 cm
                                 2
                                    (least squares equation constrained to pass through origin)
         proportionality constant = EAC/EA

-------
        TABLE A-25.
PERCENT RECOVERY OF MIXTURE  OF NITROGENOUS  COMPOUNDS AFTER  PASSAGE THROUGH XAD-8
                TENAX RESINS  (pH OF MIXTURE  UNADJUSTED)
                                                                                                            AND
10
ON
00
compound

uracll
indole
tyros ine
purlne
guanlne
cytoslne
adenlne
creatlnlne
tryptophan
15-20 ml ,.
Aa
35.5
0
17.1
29.9
20.2
18.4
37. B
33.1
0
HD
63.6
0
16.7
16.7
7.8
19.4
20.8
25.3
0
20-45 ml
A
59.7
0
55.7
44.4
29.6
23.3
14.1
11.1
0
H
81.8
0
60.4
41.7
39.7
25.0
11.5
13.3
0
45-100 ml
A
93.5
0
70.0
99.1
40.5
77.9
58.4
67.8
97.9
H
98.9
0
83.3
70.8
65.5
74.1
57.3
63.9
75.0
100-150 ml
A
88.7
0
67.1
81.2
52.6
88.3
77.0
89.2
65.1
H
99.4
0
85.4
83.3
78.4
93.5
78.1
85.5
75.0
150-200 ml
A
93.5
0
82.9
100
48.6
98.8
86.5
98.5
17.5
H
100
0
93.8
91.7
84.5
97.2
95.8
96.4
58.3
200-300 ml
A
100
0
88.6
100
55.5
100
98.9
100
100
H
100
0
100
100
91.4
100
100
100
69.4
300-400 ml
A
82.3
0
67.1
94.0
53.0
89.9
69.2
56.0
73.2
H
93.2
0
93.8
95.8
86.2
100
93.8
94.0
83.3
      A • peak area computed from integrator counts


      H - peak height

-------
 TABLE A-26.   PERCENT RECOVERY OF MIXTURE OF  NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS DISSOLVED IN A SOLUTION CONTAINING
           20  mg/L HUMIC ACIDC ACIDIFIED TO pH 2.0 AFTER PASSAGE  THROUGH XAD-8 AND TENAX RESINS
Compound
uracll
Indole
tyros ine
purlne and]
guanlne ]
cytosine
adenlne
creatlnlne
tryptophan
ISO
30-40 ml
A a H^
25.7
0
0
12.6
11.0
7.8
-
0

40.0
0
0
12.5
B.O
7.8
12.5
0

40-50 ml
A H
34.3
0
0
39.3
43.7
29.5
-
0

46.7
0
0
38.5
34.0
33.3
29.2
0

50-75
A
77.1
0
60.0
74.8
90.4
61.1
69.2
0

ml
H
74.7
0
50.0
74.0
70.0
68.6
75.0
0

75-100 ml
A H
65.7
0
67.5
80.8
81. 5
70.5
70.9
0

77.3
0
63.3
82.3
72.1
72.5
100
0

100-150 ml
A H
77.1
0
84.2
86.7
92.7
76.3
22.9


84.0
0
47.5
78.1
74.0
74.5
100
9.4

150-200 ml
A H
94.3
0
100
99.1
85.9
96.9
92.3
74.7

93.3
0
100
94.8
90.0
92.2
95.8
62.5

200-300 ml
A H
91.4
0
53.3
85.0
90.4
72.5
65.4
-

82.7
0
87.4
86.5
76.0
78.4
75.0
100

300-400 ml
A H
100
0
100
100
100
100
100
34.9

100
0
100
100
100
100
100
100

400-500 ml
A H
94.3
0
62.9
82.3
79.3
40.4
77.8
100

81.3
0
81.3
BO. 2
74.0
74.5
88.7
62.5


A • peak area as computed from Integrator counts

H • peak height

  humlc acid not eluted

-------
                              TABLE A-27.  VALUES OF KJELDAHL-N BLANKS (mg/L)
                                                                             a
NJ
-»j
o
digestion solution
composition
A.

B.

C.

D.
134 g K2S04
5 ml SeOCl2
200 ml H2S04
diluted to
1 liter
20 g K2S04
0.2 g Se02
110 ml H2S04
diluted to
1 liter
134 g K2S04
2 g HgO
200 ml H2S04
diluted to
1 liter
20 g K2S04
0.1 g Se02
sample
reagent
blank

reagent
blank

reagent
blank

reagent
blank
reference
cell
undigested
NH3-N
blank

undigested
NH3-N
blank

undigested
NH3-N
blank

distilled
water
digestion duration
(minutes)
60
120
180

120
180

60
120
180

120
absorbance
at 635 nm
.075
.082
.068

.086
.072

.081
.052
.044

.140
.136
         500 ml H2S04
         diluted to
         1 liter
          determined  by  Scheiner's  method (79)
  .147
  .152
  .172
(mean = 0.149)
(standard deviation
 = 0.014)

-------
                        TABLE A-28.   EFFICIENCIES OF DIGESTION COMPOSITION AND DURATION
N>
source
Charles River
(12/19/77)




Charles River
(12/19/77)

Charles River
(12/16/77)

Charles River
(12/16/77)
Charles River
(12/16/77)

Charles River
(12/16/77)
sample
XAD-8
filtered




XAD-8
filtered

filtered to 10 ym


XAD-8
filtered
filtered to 10 pm


XAD-8
filtered
digestion
duration
(minutes)
60
60
120
120
180
180
180
180

70
150

70

180


180

Kjeldahl-Na
(mg/L)
4.2
4.0
4.1
4.0
4.0
3.9
4.0
3.8

7.0
7.0

7.1

7.8


2.4

digestion
solution
composition
134 g K2S04
5 ml SeOCl2
200 ml H2S04
diluted to liter with HJ
z

20 g K2S04; 0.2 g Se02
110 ml H2S04 diluted to
1 liter with water
134 g K2S04; 4 ml SeOCl2
200 ml H2S04 diluted to
1 liter with water


134 g K2S04; 2 g HgO
200 ml H2S04 diluted to
1 liter with water


         Determined by Scheiner's method (79).

-------
TABLE A-29.  RETENTION TIMES (IN MINUTES) OF NITROGENOUS  ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
 0-1
 pyridlne
 pyrrole
 creatinine
 uric acid
 hydroxyproline
 aspartic acid
 succinimide
 alanine
 barbituric acid
 hydroxyproline
 i-(-)histidine
1-3
6-8
12-13
19-23
creatine
thymine
uracil
caffeine
tryptophan
indole
purine
guanine
cytosine
adenine
            column:  Zipax SCX
            mobile phase:  0.01 M HN03
            flow rate:  1.2 ml/min
            wavelength:  254 nro
            temperature:  30°C
TABLE A-30.  RETENTION TIMES (IN MINUTES)  OF NITROGENOUS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
     1 - 1.5
   1.5  - 2
      2  -  2.3
  column:   Aminex A-27
  mobile phase:  0.325 M ammonium acetate
  flow rate:   0.5 ml/min
  wavelength:   254 nm
  temperature:  30°C
                     4-(-)histidine
                     creatinine
                     uric acid
                     succinimide
                     aspartic acid
                     alanine
                     hydroxyproline
                     tryptophan
                     indole
           2.3 -  2.5
cytosine
pyridine
uracil
proline
pyrrole
thymine
creatine
adenine
purine
guanine
                                   272

-------
         TABLE  A-31.
AVERAGE ELUTION POSITIONS (ml) OF NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS USING DIFFERENT
       CHROMATOGRAPHIC COLUMNS AND MOBILE PHASES
u>
column
Zlpax SCX
Zlpax SCX
Zlpax SCX
Zlpax SCX
Zlpax SCX
Zlpax SCX
Zipax SCX
Zlpax SCX
Zlpax SCX
Zlpax SCX
Zlpax SCX
Zlpax SCX
Zlpax SCX
Zlpax SCX

Arainex A- 27
Anlnex A- 27
Zlpax SCX
Zlpax SCX
mobile phase
10~ M perchloric
10", M perchloric
10 M H3P04
0.172 M HAc (pN-2.5)
0.05 M H3P04 (pH-2.1)
10"2 HN03 (pH-2.0)
\Q~ UNO 3
10 II NO 3
ID'2 HN03
0.7 x 10-2 HN03
0.3 x 10-2 HN03
0.5 x 10-2 HN03
0.6 x 10~2 HNO;J
ID'2 HN03 with 1Z
acetonltrlle
3 M NH 4 Ac /HAc
0.3 M NH^Ac/HAc
0.5 M NaN03, 4 x 10~3
HN03
ID'2 I1N03
cytoslne

u
N.obs0
c
42 & 55
10.3 & 24
46
39
36
50.5
N.obs
N.obs
72.5
37.8



21.1
25.3
creatlnlne





8.6 & 34
N.obs
29 & 41
27 & 43
30 & 46
N.obs

75 & 115
35 & 58



N.obs
14.5
alanlne




7.55
4.84
6.6
6.6
6.2








3.74
5.09
Indole
2.0
2.0
1.91
1.87
1.96
2.0
1.77
1.8
1.9








2.02
1.88
water
1.37
1.52
N.obs
1.54
1.51
1.59
1 6 1.5
1.5
1.5






1 6 1.4
0.8 & 4.0
1.48
1.55
a
resolution




1/1/1
1/1/1/1
1/1/1
1/1/2
1/1/2
poor


poor
1/1




1/1/1/1
          resolution:   numbers indicate quantity of compounds each successive chromatographic peak (not
          including water peak).

          N.obs = no peak observed.
         f\
          Two values indicate more than one peak observed for the compound.

-------
TABLE A-32.  RETENTION VALUES (ml) OF SELECTED NITROGENOUS COMPOUNDS ON ZORBAX CN
mobile phase
.05 M NaAc/HAc buffer
(pH 5.0); 29Z MeOH
.05 M NaAc/HAc buffer
(pH 5.0); 15Z acetonltrlle
.05 M NaAc/HAc buffer
(pH 5.0); 1Z acetonltrlle
.05 M NaAc/HAc buffer
(pH 5.0); 30Z acetonltrlle
.005 M NaAc/HAc buffer
(pH 5.0); 40Z acetonltrlle
.05 M NaAc/HAc buffer
(pH 5.0); 40Z acetonltrlle
.05 M NaAc; .05 N HAc;
(pH 4.74); 25* acetonltrlle
.05 N NaAc; .025 N HAc
(pH 5.0)
.01 M phosphate buffer
(pH 6.9)
cytoslne
3.25

3.42

3.78

16.2

14.7

2.89

2.85

4.07

4.26

creatlnlne
3.29

3.3

3.86

17.4

10.4

2.89

3.01

4.16

4.16
^^^^^•^^^••^^g^^^^^
alanlne Indole water
13.3 46.8 2.5 & 5.0

19.8 29.9 2.2 & 5.0
V
N. obs 87.54 2.8 & 3.7

N. obs 14.6 & 18.8 3.2 & 3.3

20.64 2.6 & 3.4

10.8 2.3 & 3.1

24.6

103.67

96.0
	 -?^^^^== =====
a
resolution
2/1/1

2/1/1

2/1

1/1/1

2/1

2/1

2/1

2/1

2/1
!
 Resolution:  numbers  indicate quantity of  compounds  comprising  each  successive  chromatographic  peak
  (not  including water  peaks).
  N.obs = no peaks observed.

-------
            TABLE A-33.  RETENTION VALUES (ml)  OF SELECTED NITROGENOUS  COMPOUNDS ON ZORBAX C8
mobile phase cytoslne
.05 M NaAc/HAc buffer 2.64
(pH 5.0); 30% acetonitrile
(1/26/78)
.01 M phosphate buffer b 2.35
(pH 6.9); 1/27/78
.001 M phosphate buffer 2.22
(pH 6.9)
.01 M phosphate buffer 2.66
(pH 7.0); KH2P04 + NaOH
.05 M phosphate buffer
(pH 6.9); 30% acetonitrile
1/27/78
.05 N NaAc/HAc buffer 3.08
(pH 5.0); 15% acetonitrile
n
creatinlne alanine, indole resolution
* uracil &
guanine
2.67 - 42.5 2/1
2 . 35 - - unresolved
2.23 - - unresolved
2.71 - - unresolved
35.96
3.08 2.6 158.0 3/1

aresolution:  numbers  indicate  quantity  of  compounds  comprising each successive  chromatographic peak
              (not  including water  peaks)

  column temperature heated to  33°C

-------
   TABLE A-34.   RETENTION  VOLUMES OF CREATINE ON ZIPAX SCX3
    concentration  (mg/L)                    retention (ml)

           100                                  10.7
           200                                   9.9
           300                                  10.2
           500                                   9.2
         1,000                                   8.5
         2,000                                   7.9
         2,300                                   7.6
'mobile phase:  .05 M NH^PO  adjusted to pH 2.5 with H
                             276

-------
                                                                APPENDIX B
a
»
o
o
3
I
                                                Suplf:
                                                    1.
                                                    2.
                                                    1.
                                                    4,
                                                    5.
                                                    6.
ill of Mixture of 11 nltrogenoui coapoundi:
        urccll     5.0 ag/L
        Indol*     i.O «K/L
        (linlni    1,000 ag/L
        tyroilnr   5.0 ti^/L
        purlne     10.0 m«/L
        guanlne    15.0 ng/L
Colupn picking:  Zlpax SCX
Coluan dlnpnsiona:   lenatti • 1
Mobile phase:
U.V. detector
Pressure:   3.000
Flow rat*:   2.2 ml/nln
Temperature:  "v-20'C
Chart speed:  1'Vmln
 7.
 8.
 9.
10.
11.
                           cr*itin»
                           cyton In*
                           •den in*
                           creatinlne
                           tryptophin
2,300
40.0
20.0 «g/L
50.0 «/L
20.0 «g/l
                                                                          •; I.D. •
                                                             .05 • NH^PO*, adjmted to pH 2.5 with
                                                                 lenRth - 233 nm:  lensUlvlty
                                                                                            .0*
                                                                                                                            •1
                                                      10
                                                                              is
                                                                                                      20
                                                            MIIIIIIKrl
      Figure  B-l.   Chromatogram of mixture  of  11 nitrogenous compounds resolved  on Zipax  SCX  (233 nm)

-------
ro
t
o
5
c
I
                                                                                       S«»pt«:  SO ill of Mixture  of 1  nitroft*noufl covpoundv:
                                                                                               ur«c 11
                                                                                               Indolr
                                                                                               alanlnc
                                                                                               tvroilne
                                                                                               pur 1 in-
                                                                                               Kuan tnc
'.0 •«/!,
S.O .K/I.
1.000 -g/1.
5.0 «R/L
10.0 ng/L
15.0 «K/I-
                                                                                                               7.   rreitlne
                                                                                                               8.   cytoaine
                                                                                                               9.   adenlne
                                                                                                              10.   crejitlnlfie
                                                                                                              11.   tryptaphin
                                                    1,100 .,/!,
                                                    40.0 «K/L
                                                    20.0 ««/L
                                                    SO.O mgfl
                                                    20.0 «K/1.
CollKKI picking:  Zlp» STV
Cnlmn dln^nrtlons:   length  •  1 •;  l.D. • 2.1 ••
Mobile ph«sr:  .0')  « NH4l'iP()4 .d)o.i,.d to pH ?.S with
U.V. detrctur:  wnv«lrnpih  -  254 n«; •rniltlvlty -  .04
Prrtsurr:   I.OHO p
-------
ro
       t
       o
       fl
       a
                                                                                        Compounds:
                                                                                        Sample:  mxture of 11 compound*
                                                                                        Colum:  Zlpax SCX (1 meter)
                                                                                        Eluent:  0.05 H NH.H.PO. adjusted to pH 2.5
                                                                                               •Hh HjPOj
                                                                                        Wavelength: 270 nm
                                                                                        Attenuation: 0.04
                                                                                        Temperature: ambient
                                                                                        Flow rate: 2.2 ml/mln
                                                                                        Chart speed: 1 Inch per Minute
   Uradl  1.0 «K|/1
 2. Indole  0.5 mg/1
 3. Alantne 500 mg/1
 4. Tyrostne 5.0 mg/1
   Purine  10.0 mg/1
   Guanlne 25.0 mg/1
   Creatlne 200 mg/1
   Cytoslne 10.0 mg/1
   Adenlne 25.0 mg/1
   Creatlntne 10.0 ng/1
11. Tryptophan 10.0 ing/1
                                                           Elutlon Time 1n Minutes
                                                                                                                    10
                                                                                                                              11
                                        I
                                        12
            Figure  B-3.   Chromatogram  of  mixture  of 11 nitrogenous  compounds resolved  on  Zipax  SCX (220  nm)

-------
 t
 i
 c
 1
  .                               •lllllll...
 'igure B-4.   Chromatogram of mixture  of  11 nitrogenous  organic compounds
                 resolved  on  Zipax  SCX (220  nm).
                                 pl«:  RAW Charlvi Klver. t ;i«^ r Id*;,-, MA. 1-2H-7A, cunctntr«E«d 125 fold
                                  (- 22: mi/L ora.-inU-»)
                                               ( -H
                               Column dlB«.-nitonis:  Irnxili - .'s on;  l.D. • 2.1 M
                               Mobil* (rfij.c-   .C'>« X.,N(M'IL'., hufii-r (pH • S.G)
                               L'.V. detocor:  wjv.Ui^tli • 211 n>: ,inslilvil. - 0.0,
                                   «: 2.00       40       10
                                       •IllllllCrl

Figure B-5 .   Chromatogram  of Charles  River water  sample,  resolved on Zorbax C-
                                                280

-------
     s
     £
                                !•:  l*w Coaci
                                    -»)
                                  .. .
                                     I   '
-------
t
o
4
                  Sample:  Merrlmack River, Lawrence, MA, concentrated  100 fold,  after filtra-
                       tion through XAD-4 nacroretlcular resin (• 69.5  mg/L organic-N).
                  Column packing:  Zlpax SCX
                  Column dimensions:   length -In;  l.D. • 2.1 mm
                  Mobile phase:   .OSM  NH4H2P04 adjusted to pH 2.5 with  HlPOi,
                  U.V. detector:   wavelength - 233 nm; sensitivity -  0.04
                  Pressure:  2,500 psl
                  Flow rate:   2.0  ml/mln
                  Temperature:   •v-20'C
                  Chart speed:   0.2"/mln
T-        —p-
 K>          20
     Mlllllit*r«
                                          30
                                                        4U
                                                                  50
Figure  B-7.   Chromatogram  of Merrimack River water  sample,  resolved
                Zipax SCX.
                                                                               on
                                         282

-------
       500-1
       400 -J
     c
     o
     -1
     (0
     (A
     O
     o
     <0
    90-
     2|   70^
00
10
     o;
     *•»
     i
     o>
C
3
*-»•
cn
         50-
         30-
   1ug/l
   glycine—»•
         10-
    blank—*>
    Figure B-8.
                                    10
                                                                      26
30
                                                                                              34
38
                             14        18       22
                             Millilltars   Eluted

Fluorescence of aliquots from the chromatographic column after injection of  50 yl concen-
trated Marlboro West, raw, prechlorinated sewage  effluent,   column:   Zipax SCX.   Mobile
phase:  .05 M NaHPO. adjusted to pH 2.5 with
                                                                ^, .
                                                                34

-------
       110-
to
CO
   ^ o 90-
   •*  "^
   to
   -t  (A
   <  o

   «=  *
   2. o

   £ • 70-


   1ug/l

  glycine—t


       50-
      blank

        30-
        10-
                     I
                    4
             8   10   12
 I
14
16   18    20  22
1
24   26
 I
28
                                                                 30  32   34
 I    I    I
36   38    40
                                                Milliiiters   Eluted
     Figure B-9..
Fluorescence of aliquots  from the  chromatographic column after injection of 50 yl concen-
trated Marlboro West,  raw,  post  chlorinated  sewage effluent.  Column:  Zipax SCX.  Mobile
phase:
                         0.05 M NaH^PO, adjusted to pH 2.5 with
                                                                 ^,.

-------
               Pyrrole

                  H~
                         Purlne
                'rollru


                  H
Succinlmlde

     H
                           Pyrlmldine
      Guonme
     0      u
     U
HN^SxV


^J-^
     B
                                                               Y
                                                             NH2


                                                           Thymine

                                                              H
                                                                 NH
                                                              0

                                                            Jrocil

                                                              H
                                                              N
                                                          f  Y
                                                          L^NH
                                                             U
                                                              0
                                                          Borbituric Acid

                                                         r
                                                         5-Chlorourocil
Figure B-10.   Chemical  structure of  some nitrogenous organic  compounds.
                                        285

-------
 p-j Tyrosine
Tryptophon
HO
Creotinlne
    CH,
                                        CH2CH(NH2)C02H      0
                                                                    NH
  Phenylolonine
            CH2CH(NH2)CC^H
m -ominophenol
   OH
              NH2
  Indole
  Histldlne
     H
                                                     H02CHCH2
                                                         I
                                                         NH2
                                                                     N
                        Figure B-10.  (continued)
                                  286

-------
                                 APPENDIX C

                              LITERATURE REVIEW


THE HAZARDS OF CONSUMING CHEMICALLY CONTAMINATED DRINKING WATER

     The proliferation of synthetic chemicals resulting from our expanding
industrialized economy has led inevitably to the entry of organic compounds
into our nation's water resources.  Growing awareness of the deleterious
effect of these trace contaminants on human health and the increasing number
of organic chemicals identified in municipal water supplies have resulted in
a nationwide effort to identify and quantify the full spectrum of organic
compounds reaching the water consumer.  Hundreds of organic contaminants,
present at nanogram to parts per million concentrations, have now been iden-
tified in municipal water supplies (1).   Improved analytical techniques have
increased the number of organic chemicals identified in drinking water from
just 10 in 1970 (2) to 300 in 1976 (3) and more than 700 specific compounds
in 1978 (A).  These values represent the total number of compounds identified
for all communities investigated.  The actual number of contaminants present
in a single water supply is probably much smaller.  The National Cancer
Institute, working collaboratively with the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, recently compiled a list of over 1,700 organic compounds found in
various kinds of waters ranging from industrial effluents to drinking water
(5-8).

     The direct adverse effects of these compounds on the consumer include:
1) decreased aesthetic quality resulting from taste and odors, color, and
foaming;  2) toxicological hazards, both acute and chronic; and  3) increased
carcinogenic; or  4) mutagenic risks resulting from long-term, low-level
exposure.   Additional harmful compounds are produced indirectly by reaction
of organic compounds with inorganic constituents.

     Rook (9), and Bellar, Lichtenberg and Kroner (10) found that chloroform
and other halogenated methanes are formed during the chlorination of water
for disinfection.   The carcinogenicity of these chlorinated products has
caused concern about their persistence in the environment and the extent of
their formation.

     Unfortunately very little information is available about the human health
effects of trace quantities of organic chemicals in water.  Epidemiological
studies on the effects of organic compounds identified in drinking water on
animal or bacterial populations have been minimal (11) .  Heuper and Payne  (12)
demonstrated the formation of spindle cell sarcomas at the site of sub-
cutaneous injection of carbon chloroform extracts (CCEO as well as internal
papilloma and neoplastic reactions in mice.  Jolley et al. (13) reported that

                                     287

-------
 organic  residues isolated from drinking water by reverse  osmosis produced
 mutagenes?s  in Salmonella.  A number of unpublished studies  reported by the
 director of  the National Cancer Institute (14)  have shown a  pattern of
 statistical  association between elevated cancer risk rates and  surrogates for
 organic  contaminants in drinking water.

      Toxicological data on the risks of ingesting chemical pollutants in
 drinking water are also scarce.  Tardiff (15) reported  that  128 slightly to
 super toxic  compounds and 43 suspect or positive carcinogens were present
 among the organic compounds listed as having been found in tap  water.
 Kopfler  (16)  cited chloroethers and chlorobenzenes as examples  of compounds
 identified in drinking water that may be responsible for  some forms of
 chronic  illness.   The Environmental Protection  Agency recently  commissioned
 the Medical  College of Virginia to undertake a  two year study on the impact
 of trace organic  compounds on human health.   Although the leader of the
 research team was reported to have asserted  that none of  the 700 trace
 chemicals studied posed any significant threat  to human health  (17-19), this
 was later refuted by both the research chairman (20)  and  EPA (11).  Findings
 of a  1977 National Academy of Sciences study on the effects  of  potential
 toxicants (11)  listed one compound,  vinyl chloride,  as  a  known  human carci-
 nogen, and two  (benzene and benzo (a)-pyrene) as suspected human carcinogens.
 Nineteen  other  compounds were listed as animal  or suspected  animal carcinogens.
 The study also  presented acceptable  daily intake (ADI)  levels for 45 other
 organic  compounds.   ADI values indicate the  level at  which exposure to a
 single chemical is not anticipated to produce an observable  toxic response in
 humans.   The  health effects of the majority  of  the 74 non-pesticides and 309
volatile  organic  compounds identified in drinking water and  selected for
 review,  could not  be assessed because of inadequate  or  unavailable toxicolo-
gical information.

     The  effects  of  chronic exposure to low  does of  organic  micropollutants
remain largely unknown.   However,  EPA's scientific advisory  board (21) agreed
 that a currently  unquantifiable human health risk exists  from consumption of
organically polluted  drinking water.   The bases  for  the opinion that there
are hazards from  consumption of chemically contaminated drinking water were
summarized by the  director of the  National Cancer Institute  as  follows:

      1.    Chemicals  which have been  shown to cause cancers in animal
           studies  are  commonly found in drinking water  in  small amounts.
      2.    Some known  human carcinogens have  been found  in  drinking water.
      3.    Exposure  to  even very small amounts of  carcinogenic chemicals
           poses some  risk and repeated exposures  amplify  the risk.
      4.    Cancers  induced  by exposure to small amounts  of  chemicals may not
           be manifested  for 20 or  more years  and  thus are  difficult to relate
           to a single  specific cause.

      5.    Some portion  of  the population that is  exposed  is  at  greater risk
          because of other  contributed  factors such as  prior disease states,
          exposure to other  chemicals,  or  genetic  susceptibility (14)."
                                     288

-------
     The Interim Primary Drinking Water Standards promulgated in December,
1974 and effective June 1977 (22) reflected the insufficiency of epidemiolo-
gical and toxicological data on the health effects of organic chemicals by
their exclusion of maximum contaminant levels (MCL) for specific organic
chemicals other than certain pesticides.   The original regulations did, how-
ever call for a maximum contaminant level for the total concentration of
organic compounds, as measured by the carbon chloroform extract which was
later withdrawn (21).  A recent proposed amendment to the National Interim
Primary Drinking Water Regulations (4) contained a maximum contaminant level
of 0.1 mg/L for total trihalomethanes (TTHM's) including chloroform.


ORGANIC IMPURITIES IN NATURAL WATERS

     Organic substances occur in the environment:  either as the result of
natural processes or their introduction by man.  Natural sources contribute
the majority of organic material in natural waters (4,23), via decay of
vegetation and animal tissues (humic matter), animal excretion, photosynthetic
byproducts and extracellular release of organic matter b> plankton and
aquatic macrophytes.  Sources of man-derived organic contaminants include:
domestic, agricultural and industrial wastes, accidental spillages, dispersed
pesticides, rainfall, seepage and non-point-source runoff.

     Until recently the organic content of water was generally evaluated
using gross analytical determinations such as Total Organic Carbon (TOC),
Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), various extracting methods (Carbon Chloroform
Extract, CCE; or Gabon Alcohol Extract, CAE), or Biological Oxygen Demand
(BOD).  Quantitative determination of individual molecular species present in
the microgram per liter range represented a formidable task.  The need to
understand the specific nature of the array of contaminants present in our
water supplies, however, has led to significant progress in the development
of methods and instrumentation required for the identification and quanti-
fication of such contaminants.  Resins, capable of removing specific cate-
gories of trace organic compounds, and the development of gas- and liquid-
chromatographic techniques have made possible the detection and measurement
of many types of both volatile and non-volatile organic compounds from dilute
sources.

     Measurements of organic carbon in natural waters were reported as early
as 1926 by Birge and Juday  (24) who investigated the organic matter content
of Wisconsin lakes.  They found concentrations of 3-13 mg/L organic carbon
and 0.14-0.75 mg/L organic nitrogen.  In 1934 during a survey of 529 lakes,
they reported  (25) organic carbon concentrations ranging from 1.2-28.5 mg/L
with a mean of 7.7 mg/L.  These determinations were based on total solids,
and may therefore have had positive errors, attributable to carbonate
decomposition.

     A summary of the extent of organic impurities in natural waters is
presented in Table C-l.  One particularly noteworthy study is the Environ-
mental Protection Agency's National Organics Reconnaissance Survey (NORS)
which was undertaken in response to the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974  (40).
This act directed EPA to, "conduct a comprehensive study of public water

                                     289

-------
                             TABLE  C-l.  ORGANIC  IMPURITIES  IN SURFACE WATERS
VO
o
Water Resource
Lake water
529 lakes
Tap water
Lake Huron
municipal water
(unidentified)
river water
(unidentified)
Municipal waters
Surface waters
Potable water
Constituent
organic carbon
organic nitrogen
organic carbon
organic compounds
eluted from carbon
filter with dlethyl
ether
average
organic carbon
average organic
carbon
carcinogenic
substances
chlorinated
hydrocarbons
Concentration
3-13 mg/L
0.14-0.75 mg/L
1.2-28.5 rag/L
(mean =7.7 mg/L)
113 Mg/L organic-C
3.1 mg/L
1.6 mg/L
11.8 mg/L
0.9 mg/L
3.2 mg/L
recovered
-
Place Year
1926
1934
Cincinnati 1951
1963
12 cities 1968
in AZ, CA,
NM, and OR
1969
1963
1965
lower 1970
Mississippi
Reference
Birge and Juday
Birge and Juday
Braus , H . et al.
Van Hall e£ al.
Nelson and Lysyj

(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
Borneff (29)
Borneff e£ al,. (30)
Takemura et al. (31)
Sweet (32)

                                                                               (continued)

-------
                                               TABLE C-l  (continued)
     water Resource
Constituent
Concentration
Place
Year
Reference
NJ
\0
     Water supplies
     Potable water
     Surface waters
     Raw and  finished
     water  supplies

     Surface  water
     Surface water


     Surface water


     Surface water
carbon chloroform    many exceeded
extractable organics Public Health
                     Service's recom-
                     mended limit
                     (= 200 ug/L)

chlorinated
hydrocarbons
carbon chloroform
extract

carbon alcohol
extract
46 organic
chemicals
0.02-0.57 mg/L
(weighted mean
0.08 mg/L)
0.03-4.6 mg/L
(weighted mean
0.21 mg/L)

trace amounts
di-n-butyl phthalate 1-30 ppb
dibutoxyethoxymethane
di-2-ethylhexyladipate
di-octylphthalate
di-isodecylphthalate

biphenyl, trichloro- 0.1-0.5 ppb
benzene butylbenzoate
dissolved organic
carbon
dissolved organic
carbon	
0.1-15'mg/L
(mean =>1.2 mg/L)


< 1 mg/L
                                1970
                    U.S. Public Health
                    Service (33)
lower       1971
Mississippi

129 stations 1957
throughout  1972
United States
                                        Friloux (34)
        Committee Report (41)
lower       1972    E.P.A. (35)
Mississippi

Monatlquot  1972    Hites and Blemann (36,
River, MA           37)
Merrimack   1973    Malcolm and Leenheer
River, MA           (38)

100 sites   1973    Malcolm and Leenheer
in 21 U.S.          (38)
cities

Wilmington, 1973    Malcolm and Leenheer (38)
N.C.		^	
          (continued)

-------
TABLE C-l (continued)
Water Resources Constituent
Surface water CHC13
CHCl2Br

CHClBr2
CHBr3
Potable water chloroform
bromodichloro-
me thane
dibroraochloro-
me thane
Natural waters 16 organic
compounds
ISJ
VO
10 Raw and finished chloroform
water supplies




non volatile
organic carbon
85 organic compounds
Surface water total organic
carbon
Surface water total organic
carbon
Drinking water 187 compounds
Concentration
6.0-54.0 yg/L
A. 3- 20.0 yg/L

1.7-13.3 yg/L
1.1-10.0 yg/L
37.3-152 yg/L
2.9-20.8 ug/L

0.1-2.0 yg/L

identified


trace-0.9 yg/L
in 62% of the
sampled raw water;
0.1-311 yg/L in all
of the sampled fin-
ished water.
< 0.05-12.7 mg/L
(median = 1.5 mg/L
identified
7-45 mg/L

5 mg/L

identified
Place Year
stored 1974
surface
water


tap water 1974
from var-
ious muni-
cipal
supplies
1975


National 1975
Organics
Reconnaisance
Survey of
80 water
supplies



Minnesota 1975
river basins
Lake Super- 1975
ior
U.S. 1975
Reference

Rook (9)




Bellar, Lichtenberg,
and Kroner (10)


Pitt, Jolley, and
Scott (39)

E.P.A. (21)





Symons et al. (40)


Maier et_ al (23)

Maier e£ al (23)

Mullaney (42)
                              (continued)

-------
                                                TABLE C-l (continued)
IO
u>
Water Resource
Surface waters



Surface waters



Natural waters
Drinking waters
Drinking waters

Drinking water

Drinking waters


Surface waters





Drinking water

Constituent
33 and 22 trace
organic compounds


140 trace organlcs
chloroform


16 organlcs
8 organics
72 organlcs

117 peaks in carbon
chloroform extract
27 classes of 360
organic solutes

160 acid extractable
compounds
89 base extractable
compounds
81 purgeable organic
compounds
700 trace chemicals

Concentration
identified



found
present in over
80% of the samples

ug/L levels
ug/L levels
identified

found

Identified at
concentrations
< 1 ppb
found


Place
2 Phila-
delphia
water
supplies
around
Industrial
centers
in the U.S.


5 supplies
in U.S.
13 U.S.
cities
England


204 sites
in S.W. U.S.
near heavily
Year
1976



1976



1976

1976

1976

1976


1977


Reference
Suf fet e_t al. (43)



Chian et al. (44)



Pitt, Jolley, and
Katz (45)
Coleman £t al. (46)

Keith e£ al. (47)

Newell (48)


E.P.A. (49)


industrialized


reported from
previous
areas

U.S.
cities


1978



E.P.A. (4)

                                                findings

-------
supplies and drinking water sources, to determine the nature, extent, sources,
and means of control of contamination by chemical or other substances sus-
pected of being carcinogens (50)."  The survey confirmed that the problem of
organic compounds in drinking water was widespread and that trihalomethanes
were present in yg/L quantities in most finished drinking waters as a result
of chlorination (51).  The most recent comprehensive data on the presence of
organic chemicals in drinking water are found in the National Organics
Monitoring Survey (NOMS) of 1976 and 1977  (4,52).  The NOMS was intended to
provide a more comprehensive survey of synthetic organic contamination in
finished drinking water by monitoring 21 specific organic compounds, and
four general parameters of organic content in 113 community water supplies.
The compounds were selected on the basis of possible occurrence, available
toxicological data, and the existence of analytical methodology for their
identification and quantification.  The general parameters monitored in-
cluded:  1) total nonpurgeable organic carbon;  2) carbon chloroform extract;
3) ultraviolet absorbance; and  4) emission fluorescence.  Initial results
(52) indicated that the occurrences and concentrations of trihalomethanes in
finished water were greater than for any of the other selected compounds
studied in the survey.  Total trihalomethane concentrations ranged from 0.02
to 550 yg/L.  Many of the selected contaminants were frequently found at low
concentrations in many of the cities.  Supplies located on rivers downstream
from large industries were more susceptible to raw-water contamination.
General parameters did not correlate with  the occurrences of specific organic
compounds.

     Although large strides have been made towards quantifying the vast array
of organic contaminants in water supplies, the identity of only 40% by weight
of the non-humic material present has been established (21,11).  Table C-2
shows the percentage of organic compounds  identified in different categories
of materials present in natural waters.  About 90% of the volatile organic
compounds has been identified, as compared to only 30-60% of the non-humic
non-volatile constituents (53,11).  Included in the larger fraction of un-
identified compounds is the category of compounds comprising the topic of
this report:  nitrogenous organic materials.  The non-volatile property of
most of these substances has made their identification and analysis by gas
chromatography difficult without the prior formation of volatile derivatives.
Recent advances in the field of high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC),
however, have made the detection of non-volatile nitrogenous compounds in-
creasingly feasible.
NITROGENOUS ORGANIC  COMPOUNDS

     Although previous  attention  has been  focussed on the environmental
hazards of non-polar chlorinated  organic contaminants, nitrogenous organic
compounds are also environmentally  significant.  Many naturally occurring
nitrogenous organic  compounds  react readily with aqueous chlorine exerting
significant chlorine demand  (54,55).  Guter, Cooper and Sorber (56)
hypothesized that N-chloro compounds were  formed during the chlorination of
polluted waters and  that  some  of  these  react more readily with supposedly
selective reagents for  free  active  chlorine than do the ammonia chloramines,
Several types of N-chloro organic compounds have been identified that yield


                                    294

-------
   TABLE C-2.   COMPOSITION OF MATERIALS IDENTIFIED IN NATURAL WATERS

Classification
Volatile
Non Volatile
Humic Non Humic
Approximate % com-
position in natural
waters

Z of organic com-
pounds identified
in classification
10
90
         75
15
Z of total com-
pounds identified
in natural waters

Z of non humic
compounds identi-
fied in natural
waters
36
The specific struc-         5-10
tures of the humic     (of total non
substances have not    volatile com-
been fully established pounds)

                           33-67
                       (of non-vola-
                       tile non humic
                       compounds)

                           A.5-9
                           18-36
 aHumic substances comprise  the major portion of  the organic material
in natural waters.  Percent  composition of total  organic material  in
different waters will vary.
                                  295

-------
 interference or false positive tests in determining free chlorine (57),
 Because these combined forms are generally much less germicidal than free
 aqueous chlorine,  falsely positive tests for free chlorine may indicate  a  non-
 existent bactericidal or virucidal behavior.  Reliable measurements  of the
 free chlorine present in water supplies or wastewater containing nitrogen  can,
 therefore,  not be  made unless the types of organic nitrogen compounds present
 are  known.

      Reactions of  a broad range of nitrogenous organic substances representa-
 tive of materials  thought likely to occur as part of the organic nitrogen  of
 water sources have been studied (54, 234) and some (m-aminophenol, uracil,
 tryptophan,  pyrrole,  chlorophyll, alanine, proline,  Jl-hydroxyproline, and
 indole)  have been  found to be potential precursors of trihalomethanes in the
 chlorination of water supplies.  Purine and pyrimidine bases such as caffeine,
 cytosine, and uracil  (commonly found in wastewaters) have been shown to
 produce complex stable mutagenic chlorinated products upon chlorination  (58-
 65)  suggesting that N-chloro compounds may be significant intermediates  for
 the  compounds causing mutagenic activity in finished waters.   5-chlorouracil
 was  also shown to  effect the hatchability of carp eggs (66)  and to cause ab-
 normalities  in the larval fish produced (67).   In addition certain types of
 nitrogenous  compounds which may be present in polluted drinking water sources
 are  themselves potential health hazards or direct precursors.   Included  among
 these compounds are secondary amines capable of forming carcinogenic nitro-
 samines  (68),  nitroaromatic compounds,  and some hetero-cyclic  materials.   Some
 trace nitrogen containing polycyclic compounds are known carcinogens (69).
 Brown et al.  (70)  found the formation of local sarcomas in rats following
 subcutaneous injection of unspecified oxides of purines.   Nitro and  amino
 derivatives  of pyrrole may also be carcinogenic (71).   Tryptophan and two
 related  compounds,  indole, and indolacetic acid have been shown to enhance the
 incidence of bladder  cancer in certain closely defined situations (72-76).

      Organic nitrogen enters the environment via the pathways  previously
 described for  organic substances in general.   Table  C-3 summarizes the sources
 and  properties of  selected nitrogenous  organic compounds.   The  chemical
 structures of  some  of these substances  are shown in  Appendix B,  Figure B-10.
 Several  studies  have  begun to characterize the organic nitrogen compounds
 present  in domestic sewage (39,  81-84)  and urine (85).   Organic nitrogen
 concentrations have been reported  to be between 0.064  mg/L - 0.24 mg/L in
 several  English  lakes (86) and from trace amounts to 0.28  mg/L  in streams of
 southern New Jersey (87).   Ram (87)  reported that the  organic  nitrogen fraction
 ranged from  traces  to 15.6% of the total Kjeldahl nitrogen in  streams of
 southern New Jersey.   Some attempts have been  made to  distinguish and determine
amino acids  in natural waters (88-90).   The quantities found,  some pg/L  of
nitrogen -in  toto seem small compared with the  total  organic nitrogen expected.
Briggs  (91)  estimated that free  amino acids were present  at concentrations of
approximately  10~9  g/L in water  while Semenov  and his  coworkers (92) reported
levels of free amino  acids in surface waters of  the  Soviet Union ranging from
2-25 yg/L.   Peptide organic nitrogen has been  reported to  comprise between
15-43% of the  total organic nitrogen in surface  waters (86,93)  with  concen-
trations in  the range of  lO""* mg/L (91).   A summary  of the organic nitrogen
contents found in natural waters  is  shown in  Table C-4.
                                     296

-------
     TABLE C-3.  SOURCES AND PROPERTIES OF SELECTED NITROGENOUS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (77-80,  54,  41)
     Compound
Natural Sources
             Man Made Sources
Properties
NJ
VO
•vj
     Adenine
     Alanine
     m-Aminopheno1
a purine; nucleic acid unit.
widespread throughout animal and
plant tissues; constituent of
nucleic acids and coenzymes
an amino acid.
In soil:  sllty loam:
          clay soils:
             excreted in urine:
6-160 yg/kg  0.55 mg/kg body wt
30-400 ug/kg per day; In domestic
             sewage:  5 ug/L
derivative of phenol, coal
tar
     Aspartlc acid     an amino acid.
                       occurs in animals and plants
     Barbituric acid   pyrimidine derivative
                                    exreted in urine:
                                    0.37-3.7 mg/kg
                                    body weight per day
MWa= 135.14
LD5Q orally in rats 745
mg/kgb
W - 256.4 (H20)C

MW = 89.09
Amax = no maxima at pH 8
potential trichloro-
me thane precursor

MW = 109.12
     = 0.144 g/kg in white
       mice
     = 1 g/kg In rats
                                     MW = 133.1
                                                            MW - 128.09
                                                            *max = 257 (neutral)
                                                                              (continued)

-------
                                             TABLE C-3.  (continued)
     Compound
Natural Sources
Man Made Sources
Properties
     Caffeine
to
vD
00
     Chlorophyll
     5-Chlorouracil
     Creatine
     Creatlnine
a purine;
occurs in tea, coffee, and mat£
leaves, guarana paste and cola
nuts
green pigment of plants
present in muscular tissue of
many vertebrates
occurs in all soils and in grain
seeds and other vegetable matter
     Iso cyanurlc acid
undisinfected sewage
effluent:  
-------
                                    Table  C-3.  (continued)
Compound
Natural Source
Man Made Source
                                                                              Properties
Cytosine
Glutamic acid



Glycine



Glycylglycine


Guanine



4-Histidine
a pyrimidine; nucleic acid unit*
widely distributed In nature,
constituent of yeast and of
wheat embryo

an amlno acid
                  an amlno acid; gelatin and silk
                  fibroin are best sources
                  normal constituent of proteins

                  simplest of all peptides
                  a purlne; nucleic acid unit
                  occurs  in animal and vegetable
                  tissues, in excreta; fish scales

                  an  amino acid .
excreted by man in
urine 1.8-11.5 mg/kg
body wt per day

excreted by man In
urine 2.3-18.0 mg/kg
body wt per day
                                    excreted by man:
                                      in urine: 0.98-6.6
                                       mg/kg body wt/day
                                      in feces: 1.4-2.1
                                       mg/kg body wt/day
                                      in sweat: 6-10 mg/
                                       100 ml
                        MW = 75.07
                        xmax " 27° (water)
                                                                              MW = 147.13
                                                            MW - 75.07
                                                            *max • 630 (water,
                                                                   copper  chelate)

                                                            MW = 132.12; Xmax - no
                                                            maximum at pH 7

                                                            MW = 151.13
                                                            xmax • 248 (cation)
                        MW = 155.16
                        *max = 217.5
                        (pH=7)
                                                                          (continued)

-------
                                           TABLE C-3.  (continued)
      Compound
Natural Source
Man Made Sources
                                                                                    Properties
     fc-Hydroxyproline  an  amino  acid
     Indole
     Leuclne
constituent of coal tar
natural pigments
an amino acid
UJ
o
o
     i-Proline
an amino acid
     Pyridlne
excreted by man in
urine:  0.02 mg/kg
body weight per day

excreted in human
feces, contents of
domestic sewage:
0.25 ug/L

excreted by man:
  in urine: 0.2-0.52
   mg/kg body wt/day
  in feces: 4.3-6.9
   mg/kg body wt/day
  in sweat: 1.2-4.2
   mg/100 ml

excreted in man in
urine:   0.3-0.9 mg/kg
body wt/day
                                    constituent of coal
                                    tar
MW = 131.13
potential  trichloro-
methane precursor

MW = 117.14
Amax = 278 (H20)
potential  trichloro-
methane precursor

MW = 131.7
no maximum U.V. absorp-
tion at pH 8
MW - 115.13
xmax = 200 (MeOH) poten-
tial trlchloromethane
precursor

MW = 79.1 faint odor at
.0037 mg/L; acute oral
LD50 in rat = 0.8-1.6
g/kg; transient symptoms
in man:  125 ppm, 4 hrs/
day, for 1-2 weeks;
Amax = 250 (H20)
                                                                           (continued)

-------
                                       TABLE C-3. (continued)
Compound
Natural Source
Man Made Source
Properties
Pyrlraidlne
Pyrrole
Sarcoslne


dfc-Serine



Succlnlmlde

Taurlne



Thymlne


Tryptophan
basic heterocyclic ring
building block for chlorophyll
hemoglobin, hemocyanin, etc.
found in star fishes and
sea urchins

an araino acid
present in bile, lungs and
flesh of oxen, shark blood
muscles, oysters

pyrimidine derivative, isolated
from thymus; nucleic acid unit

an  amino acid
constituent of coal
tar and bone oil
excreted by man in
urine 0.35-1.4 nig/kg
body wt/day
MW = 80.09
*max = 200 (MeOH)
potential trichloro-
methane precursor

MW = 67.09; minimum
lethal dose: in mice =
60.5 g/kg; potential
trihalomethane precursor;
Xmax = 205 (H20)

MW = 89.09
MW
105.09
                        MW - 99.09

                        MW • 125.14
                        MW = 126.11
                               266
 excreted  in man in      MW = 204.22; Xmax a 278
 urine:  0.23-1.3 mg/kg   (pH 7); potential tri-
 body wt/day also  found  halomethane precursor
 in  human  saliva & blood _ .
                                                                        (continued)

-------
                                            TABLE C-3. (continued)
      Compound
Natural  Sources
Man Made Sources
                                                                                    Properties
10
O
      TyrosIne
      Urea
      Uracil
      Uric  acid
widely distributed amlno acid
In soil:
 sllty loam: 0-65 ug/kg soil
 clay soils: 10-60 ug/kg soil

product of nitrogen metabolism
in mammals
pyrlmidine derivative
hydrolysis product of nucleic
acids
chief end product of the nitro-
genous metabolism of birds and
scaly reptiles, found in their
excrement; present in urine of
all carnivorous animals
excreted in man in      MW » 181.19
urine: 0.35-1.45 mg/kg  Amax - 274 (PH 7)
body weight per day
contents of domestic
sewages: 2-6 mg/L;
domestic sewage efflu-
ent:  .020 mg/L

in sewage effluent:
0.013 mg/L
                                                            contents  of domestic
                                                            sewages:  0.2-1.0 mg/L
                                                                                    MW = 60.06
                                                                                    Amax = 260 (pH 9.5)
MW - 112.09
^max = 203, 258 (pH :7)
potential trihalomethane
precursor

MW = 168.11
       *MW » molecular weight

        LD5Q calculated lethal dose expected  to kill 50% of an experimental animal population
       *
         ( ):  parentheses indicate solvent or conditions used in absorbance measurement

-------
             TABLE C-4.   CONCENTRATION OF TYPES OF ORGANIC  NITROGEN  IN SURFACE WATER
      Water  Resource      Constituent
                  Concentration
                    Place
Reference
10
o
      Natural Waters      amino acids
      Lake Water
      Lake Water
      River Water
peptide-N
total organic
nitrogen

total organic
nitrogen
                  1 ug/L nitrogen
                  in toto
0.056-0.436 rag/L    Lake Mendota
                    Lake Michigan

0.064-0.24 mg/L     England
trace-0.28 mg/L     Southern N.J.
Gardner & Lee (88)
Peake, Baker & Hodgson
  (89)
Georgiadls & Coffey (90)

Domogalla, «2t jil. (93)
Fogg & Westlake (86)
Ram (87)
Lake, estuary,
and ocean waters
Lake Water
dissolved free
amino acids
particulate
organic nitro-
gen
found
approximately
15% of the
particulate
organic carbon
Grob (94)
N.E. Wisconsin Croll (224)
                                                                             (continued)

-------
                                                TABLE C-4.  (continued)
U)
o
Water Resource
Lake Water
Tap Water
Constituent
free amlno
acids; pep tides
free amino
acids
Concentration
* 10~9 g/L
^ ID'7 g/L
none found
Place
North Island,
New Zealand
London, England
Reference
Briggs (91)
Sidle (95)
       Surface Water
       Surface Water
       River Water

       Hydrolyzed tap
       water
       River Water
free amino acids  2-25 yg/L as N
proteins          20-340 yg/L as N
volatile amines   6-100 yg/L as N
peptides
common amino
acids (serlne
and glycine)

pyrrole

isoleucine +
 leucine
valine
glycine
alanine
glutamic acid
aspartic acid

aromatic amines
aliphatic amines
proline
tryptophan
indole
skatole
hydroxybenzamide
226-250 yg/L
36-61 yg/L
6.03 ug/L

15.23 yg/L
6.45 yg/L
3.83 yg/L
5.00 yg/L
3.06 yg/L
                    Soviet Union
                    Rhine River
                    Semenov (92)
                    Newell (96)
Rhine River         Holluta (98)

London; England     Sidle (95)
                    Holluta & Talsky (97)
                                                                               (continued)

-------
                                           TABLE C-4.  (continued)
       Water Resource
Constituent
Concentration
Place
                                                                                    Reference
       Lake Water
u>
o
       Receiving Water
       below an Indus-
       trial plant
       Drinking water,
       river water,
       and ground water
glyclne, a-alanlne,
aspartlc acid, glu-
tamlc acid, methlonlne
sulphoxide, arginine,
glycine, hydroxypro-
llne, isoleucine,
leucine, lyclne,
norleucine, norva-
llne, ornlthlne,
phenylalanine, prollne,
serlne, threonlne and
tyrosine

N-containing
heterocycles and
other nitrogen
containing com-
pounds
                   North Island,
                   New Zealand
                    Briggs (91)
                                       Jungclaus e_£ al.  (99)
Compound;

aspartlc acid
serine
glutamic acid
glycine
alanine
leucine
phenylalanine
                                             Drinking  River
                                             Water     Water
                      Ground
                      Water
 .67 ug/L  2.66 ug/L  1.33 ug/L
1.05 ug/L  4.20 yg/L  1.58 ug/L
 .74 yg/L  4.41 ug/L   .74 ug/L
 .75 ug/L  4.50 ug/L  1.50 ug/L
 .45 ug/L   .89 ug/L   .45 ug/L
 .33 ug/L   .33 ug/L   .33 gg/L
 .83 ug/L   .83 ug/L
                    Kasiske et  al.  (231)

-------
 ALGAL PRODUCTION OF N-ORGANIC EXTRACELLULAR METABOLITES

      Blue-green algae have received considerable attention  as major nuisance
 algae because they proliferate in waters where conditions are unfavorable for
 most  other  types.   They are usually found in neutral  to  alkaline waters, are
 able  to  tolerate a relatively wide temperature range,  and are often associated
 with  taste  and odor problems (100, 101).  Although most  algae are  known to
 liberate organic compounds in general into the surrounding  aquatic environ-
 ment  during growth (102),  blue green algae are known  also to liberate
 comparatively large amounts of organic nitrogen (86,  103, 104).  Up to 50% of
 the carbon  fixed by a population can be released (105).  The amount of release
 per cell is known to be inversely related to population  density  (102,106,107),
 and is favored by high pH  (108) and inorganic nutrient deficiency  (105,109).
 (High oxygen)-(low carbon  dioxide) concentrations and  low light intensities
 typical  of  conditions in natural waters also favor release  (104).  Greatest
 liberation  in laboratory grown cultures of blue-green  algae occurs during the
 exponential phase of growth (104-106,110) although Thompson (104)  observed a
 second per  cell increase in liberated total organic carbon  in late growth.
 Thompson (104)  also reported a linear increase in secreted  TOC with time and
 a linear increase of TOC with time except for an initial peak production at
 about ten days for laboratory grown cultures of Oscilaatoria tenuis and
Anabaena flow aquae respectively after a two-day lag-period in both.  Various
 authors  have reported release of leucine, serine, alanine,  aspartic acid,
 valine (103,111),  alanine,  aspartic acid, arginine, leucine, proline, valine
 (112), glycine (103), and  other amino acids, polypeptides and proteins (102,
 103,113,114).

      These  reports suggest  that isolation and identification of N-organic
 compounds in water supplies can be facilitated by sampling  during  a blue-
 green algal bloom.


UROCHROMES  AND HUMIC SUBSTANCES

      Urochromes are yellow  pigments discharged in human  urine as the metabolic
product  of  porphyrins (115).   They are found in urine  (116-119), sewage (10-
 243 mg urochrome  per liter),  water from drainage canals  (3-14 mg urochrome
per liter)  and  treated  surface waters (0.6-1.5 mg urochrome per liter) (120).
Their  presence  in  water sources is a clear 'indication  of fecal contamination
and is therefore  of extreme concern from the standpoint  of  public  health
 (115,121).   In  addition to  the indirect hazards arising  from their association
with  enteric  bacteria (121),  their presence in water has been related to the
occurrence  of  endemic endocrine goiter in humans (122-124).

      Elementary analyses of urochromes oxy-A and B have  shown them to be
comprised of  about  2.44% and  2.61% nitrogen respectively (122,125).  Since
they  have some  of  the nitrogenous  structure of pyrrole and  porphyrin they are
potential haloform precursors.   They are therefore, considered in  this report.

      The  enrichment and isolation  of urochromes from water  samples according
to Hettche  (122,126,127) is carried out by adsorption  onto  aluminum oxide or
entrainment  precipitation with alum and ammonia.   After  elution with formic


                                      306

-------
acid and dilution to a known volume they are determined by absorptiometry at
380 nm.  Both humic acids and lignin derivatives interfere with quantitative
evaluation of urochromes (121,115).  Humic substances are high-molecular-
weight compounds comprising an unresolved range of complex polymeric aromatic
organic acids.  They result from the aqueous extraction of the soluble fraction
of wood tissues, dissolution of decomposition products of decaying wood and/or
leaching of soluble soil components (26,94).  Knorr et dl. (128) could not
distinguish humic acids from urochromes A or B infrared or ultraviolet
spectroscopy, electrophoresis, fluorescence, surface tension, or nitrogen
content.  Hettche (122) proposed distinguishing between urochromes and humic
acids by computing the difference in the logarithms of the absorbance values
at 380 and 530 nm for urochromes and humic acid respectively, and multiplying
by 1000.  A value equal to 0.9 for pure urochrome and 0.537 for humic acids,
was suggested (115).  Sattlemacher and Furstenau (129) however, observed that
no specific extinction curve could be plotted for humic substances in the
visible region.  They concluded that the method of Hettche for the determi-
nation of urochromes was inexact.  They developed a separation scheme
utilizing paper chromatography after esterification with diazooctadecane and
extraction with chloroform.

     Humic substances are also considered in this report because they form the
major part of the organic material in naturally high-colored waters  (26).
They are derived from vegetative material and have certain similar character-
istics.  Humification takes place under a wide range of environmental
conditions.  Being resistent to microbial and chemical decomposition, humus
tends to accumulate even under aerobic conditions.  Unfortunately, the
chemical structures of aquatic humic substances are not known with any
certainty (233).  Oden (130) classified all humic substances into three groups
according to their solubility in strong acid and alcohol:


       TABLE C-5.  CLASSIFICATION OF HUMIC SUBSTANCES, AFTER ODEN (130)
Classification                   Strong Acid                  Alcohol


fulvic acid                      soluble                         -

hymatomelanic acids              insoluble                    soluble

humic acids                      insoluble                    insoluble
Croll (224) reported the elemental analysis on an ash free basis for the humic
plus hymatomelanic acids and for the fulvic acids to be:  Carbon 51.52%,
Hudrogen 4.59%, Nitrogen 2.84% and Carbon 55.61%, Hydrogen 5.91%, Nitrogen
2.13%, respectively.

     Because humic substances usually comprise a large percentage of the
organic content of natural waters and because they contribute minimally to  the
total organic nitrogen content (224) it was hypothesized that their removal

                                     307

-------
 from water samples might facilitate the isolation of individual nitrogenous
 compounds.  Stuermer and Harvey (131) commented on the hydrophobic  character-
 istics of humic substances, implying the use of selective macroreticular
 resins for their removal.  Since the bulk of organic nitrogen is associated
 with hydrophilic substances (131,38) it appeared analytically feasible  to
 remove the potentially interfering humic materials from water samples with
 resins which selectively adsorb hydrophobic compounds.  Theoretically,  a
 prefiltration through such a resin bed would not significantly effect the
 hydrophilic nitrogenous compounds.  Generally speaking, macroreticular  resins
 of  low and intermediate polarity adsorb hydrophobic solutes,  while  they do not
 adsorb hydrophilic solutes (38).

      Several studies have been conducted on the adsorption of humic substances
 onto XAD  macroreticular resins (Rohm and Haas Company, Philadelphia, PA).
 Although  Oulman (133) reported that XAD-4 had poor capacity for humic sub-
 stances,  Chen (134), Blunk (135),  Stuermer and Harvey (131),  and Weber  and
 Wilson (136) observed strong adsorption of humus onto macroreticular resins  of
 varying polarity.   Cheng (134) found that adsorption of humic acid  by XAD
 resins was generally favored at neutral conditions (pH 6-7).   Blunk (135)
 adsorbed  97-99% of humic material  from untreated river water  as assayed by
 absorbance at 450  nm onto XAD-7.  Weber and Wilson (136)  adsorbed fulvic acid
 onto XAD-2 at pH 1 and Stuermer and Harvey (131) reported adsorption
 efficiencies of greater than 90% for humic substances in seawater acidified  to
 pH  2 onto XAD-2.   Junk et al.  (132) observed an increase in the adsorption of
 organic compounds  onto XAD by adding 5 ml of hydrochloric acid per  liter
 (equal to .056 M or pH of about 1.3) of standard water sample tested.   Oliver
 (233),  and Christman (234)  acidified water samples to pH 2.0  and pH 2.2,
 respectively to adsorb humic material in these samples onto XAD resins.

      Cheng (134) found that humic  substances at pH 5 were more strongly ad-
 sorbed onto XAD 1,  2, 4,  7, and 12 than onto XAD-8.   Leenheer and Huffman
 (38)  reported that XAD-8 was more  effective in adsorbing fulvic acid than
 were XAD-2 and 4.   XAD-8, however, exhibits less irreversible bonding than do
 XAD-2  and XAD-4 (Leenheer,  J.A., personal communication).   Its use  in the
 pretreatment filtration step of natural waters is therefore favored.


 MACRORETICULAR RESINS

     Natural and polluted waters contain a numerous  variety of natural  and
 synthetic compounds that  seriously interfere with the isolation,  identifi-
 cation and determination  of individual nitrogenous organic compounds.   Rohm
 and  Haas  macroreticular resins are known to adsorb selectively a broad  range
 of hydrophobic organic compounds (Table C-6).   These undesired or interfering
 carbonaceous  organic materials may be removed  by filtration through appropriate
 XAD  resins prior to concentration  and chromatographic separation without sig-
 nificant  reduction  in most  nitrogenous constituents,  with the exception of
 heterocyclic  aromatic substances.

     XAD  macroreticular resins are hard insoluble beads,  20-50 mesh, varying
 from white  to  light brown in color.   XAD-2 and XAD-4 have nonpolar  surfaces,
XAD-7  and  XAD-8 have intermediate  surfaces and XAD-12 is  highly polar (38).


                                      308

-------
                 TABLE C-6.  ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ADSORBED ONTO XAD AND TENAX MACRORETICULAR  RESINS
        Resin
             Compounds adsorbed
                                         % recovered'
Reference
o
VO
        XAD 2
XAD 2

XAD 2



XAD 2

XAD 2
        XAD 2
polycyc-Hc aromatics, n-alkanes,            36 - 100
phthalates, halogen compounds, phenols      average:
fatty acids, fatty acid methyl esters,       83.27%
steroids

pesticides in natural waters
coprostanol (a characteristic sterol
found in the feces of man and higher
animals)

organic contaminants

alcohols, aldehydes, acids, aromatic
halides, alkylbenzenes, phenols, esters,
ethers, ketones, polynuclear aromatics,
herbicides, pesticides and various
compounds containing halogens, nitrogen
or sulfur
                                                                        Shinohara et al.  (137)
                                                                 97% at flow
                                                                 rate = 3 ml/
                                                                  min
Junk £t al  (138)

Wun e_t al.  (139)



Burnham et al.  (14°)
                                                                average recov-  Junk et al. (132)
                                                                ery rate of 110
                                                                individual organ-
                                                                ic solutes was
                                                                78% with a
                                                                standard devia-
                                                                tion of 6.3%
             Nitrogen compounds:
               Hexadecylamine                             94
               Nitrobenzene                               91
               Indole                                     89
               0-Nitrotolutene                            80
               N-Methylaniline                            84
               Benzothlazole                             100
               Quinoline                                  84
               Isoquinoline                               83
                                                           Junk et al. (132)
                                                                              (continued)

-------
                                    TABLE C-6.  (continued)
Resin
Compounds adsorbed
% recovered
                                                                        Reference
XAD 2


XAD 2
XAD 2
  Benzonitrile
  Benzoxazole

visible color of 6 textile dyes
alcohols
aldehydes and ketones
esters
acids
phenols
ethers
halogen compounds
polynucleic aromatics
alkylbenzenes
nitrogen and sulfur compounds
pesticides and herbicides
weighted average

alcohols
aldehydes and ketones
alkanes
amines
aromatics
benzothizoles

esters and ethers
halogenated compounds
PCB's
phenols
weighted average
    98
    92

all visible
color removed

    94
    95
    93
   101
    89
    90
    87
    89
    90
    89
    90
    91

   100
    74
     5
    14
    68
    67

    74
    57
    78
    46
    59
Webb (141)


Junk et al. (142)
Junk et al. (143)
                                                                        (continued)

-------
                                       TABLE C-6.  (continued)
 Resin
Compounds adsorbed
% recovered
                                                                         Reference
 XAD 8
 XAO 2, 4,
 7 and 8 and
 mixtures
 XAD
 General
14 compounds  previously  identified
in industrial effluents

13 organic pollutants
phenols, alkyl sulfonic acids, dyes,
steroids, vitamin B-12, fulvic acid
 XAD-2
 XAD4/8
 Tenax GC
20 compounds representing aliphatic
hydrocarbons, aliphatic and aromatic
halogenated hydrocarbons, phthalates,
polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons
                                                       average:  63.31   Webb  (141)
an equal weight
mixture of XAD
4 and XAD-8 was
most efficient
Van Rossum and Webb  (144)
many non-ionic    Burnham et al.
organic compounds
extracted from
dilute aqueous
solution with
approximately
100% efficiency
                (145)
All of these
resins gave com-
parable results
of 64% average
recovery for
equal volumes and
equal weighto of
resin.  Tenax
averaged 80%;
XAD-2, 64%;
and XAD 4/8,
69% for equal
surface areas of
resin
Webb  (146)
£
 after elution from  resin with appropriate solvent

-------
 XAD-2 and XAD-4 are styrene-divinyl benzene copolymers while XAD-8 is an
 acrylate ester.  XAD 2, 4 and  8 have average surface areas of 330 m2/g, 750
 m g and 140 m /g respectively  and pore sizes of 90 angstroms, 50 angstroms and
 250 angstroms, respectively  (141).  Surface adsorption is the principal con-
 tributing factor to retention  on the XAD resins (147,141).  No ion-exchange
 mechanism is involved  (141).   Leenheer and Huffman (38) reported the absorptive
 capacity of XAD to vary from 5-20 mg organic carbon per gram of resin for
 different hydrophobic organic  compounds.

      Liquid-liquid extraction  and carbon adsorption were also considered as
 alternative methods for removing interfering hydrophobic materials from water
 samples.  Each of these methods, however, has several significant draw-backs
 in comparison with the XAD resins (Table C-7), and were therefore not employed.

      In addition to the XAD series other macroreticular resins have been
 developed for selective adsorption of organic compounds from water.  Ambersorb
 XE 340 (Rohm and Haas,  Philadelphia, PA) resin was recently designed to remove
 nonpolar hydrophobic organic compounds or halogenated organic molecules from
 the aqueous or gaseous  phase (148).   It is comprised  of hard, nondusting,
 black spheres whose chemical composition is intermediate between that of
 activated carbon and polymeric substances.   It has a  surface area (N2,  BET
 method)  of  400 m2/g and a pore size  distribution ranging from 6-300 angstroms
 (148).   XE  340 has  a high capacity for removal of  low molecular weight
 chlorinated organic compounds such as chloroform (148).

      Tenax  GC (Applied  Sciences Laboratory Inc., State College,  PA) is  a
 porous  polymer based on 2,6-diphenyl-p_-phenylene oxide.   It is designed as a
 gas-chromatographic support  for the  separation of  high-boiling polar compounds
 such as  alcohols, polyehtylene glycol compounds, diols,  phenols,  mono-  and
 diamines, ethanolamines,  amides,  aldehydes,  and ketones  (150).   It  has  been
 used to  concentrate organic  compounds from air (151)  and has been suggested
 as  a useful direct  accumulator for organic  compounds  from water  in  a manner
 similar  to  XAD resins  (146).   Novotmy (152)  proposed  that Tenax  be  used as an
 adsorbant for a  wide range of both polar  and nonpolar compounds.  Webb  (146)
 found significantly better recoveries of  phenol (72%),  camphor (83%), and
 alphaterpineol (87%)  on a  13  cm Tenax column in comparison with  a comparable
 XAD  column.   Twenty organic  compounds were  recovered  with 80% efficiency on
 the  Tenax resin.


 ISOLATION OF  TRACE  ORGANIC COMPOUNDS  FROM DILUTE AQUEOUS  SOLUTION

     Determination  of trace nitrogenous organic  compounds,  present  at only
nanogram levels, requires several analytical procedures:   1)  selective  ad-
sorption of extraneous  interfering organic compounds  with macroreticular
resins;  2) concentration of  the water sample  to achieve  detectable elevels  of
dissolved solutes;   3)  separation and detection  of constituent compounds using
high pressure  liquid chromatography; and  4) identification  of resolved  con-
stituents.  Selective adsorption of the hydrophobic portion  of the  dissolved
organic carbon in natural waters was considered  in the previous section.
                                     312

-------
                                     TABLE  C-7.  COMPARISONS WITH XAD RESINS
       Method
Comments
Reference
       Carbon Adsorption
LJ
M
U)
difficult to extract large volumes of water
containing small amounts of organic pollutants
unacceptable background contamination values
incomplete recovery of compounds
non-specific adsorption of compounds
Irreversible adsorption of solutes

lack of adsorption/desorption control
bacterial and oxidizing attack on the adsorbed
organic compounds
meticulous purification required
Van Rossum and Webb (144)

Van Rossum and Webb (144)
Webb  (141)
Webb  (141)
Burnham e± al. (145)
Malcolm and Leenheer (38)
Sproul and Ryckman  (149)
Sproul and Ryckman  (149)
Burnham e_t al. (145)
Burnham et al. (145)
       Solvent  Extraction
distribution coefficient for the contaminants
between water and an extracting solvent may be
unfavorable
labor requirement excessive

difficult for highly polar organic solutes
comprising a major fraction of organic solutes
should be convenient to extract hydrophobic
compounds without extracting hydrophilic
substances
Burnham et al. (145)
Van Rossum and Webb (144)

Webb(141) ; Van Rossum and
Webb(144)
Malcolm and Leenheer (38)
                                                                              (continued)

-------
                                       TABLE C-7. (continued)
Method               Comments                                           Reference


Macroreticular       selectively adsorb compounds of different polarity
Resins

                     low energy requirements, not Involving any phase
                     transition.

                     low temperature and high vapor pressure at which
                     adsorption occurs

                     favorable kinetics                                 Rohm and Hass publication  (148)

                     homogenious surface                                Malcolm and Leenheer (38)

                     high surface area and capacity

                     good stability

                     only one adsorption mechanism operative,
                     allowing solutes to be quantitatively sorbed
                     and desorbed

                     good hydraulic flow characteristics for column
                     operation

-------
     Numerous methods of concentration have been reported in the literature
including:  liquid-liquid extraction, freeze concentration, adsorptive bubble
separation, chromatography, ion exchange, ultra-filtration, adsorption,
distillation, evaporation, sublimation, and reverse osmosis (26,53,16).  Con-
siderations relative to the choice of concentration method are:  1) the
desireability of maintaining the sample at a low temperature to avoid decom-
position or reaction of solutes;  2) the necessity of collecting the solids
that separate during concentration in order to redissolve coprecipated organic
compounds;  3) the need to reduce the volume of sample within a reasonable
period of time; and  4) the requirement that the method of concentration not
alter or chemically degrade the constituents.  Extraction and adsorption do
not quantitatively concentrate all compounds of interest (81,154).  Low-
temperature vacuum-distillation appears to be the most desirable method, since
it provides efficient recovery of stable, nonvolatile organic compounds and
fulfills the requirements described above.  This method cannot, however, be
used for concentrating unstable or volatile compounds.  Low-temperature
vacuum-distillation followed by removal of residual water by lyophilization
has been used with great success by many workers (39,53,82,83,153,154).

     Recent advances in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) have
made the separation and determination of nonvolatile nitrogenous organic
compounds analytically feasible.  The ability to grade resins selectively
into narrow and uniform micropartides, advances in design of high-pressure
columns and pumps, and the development of sensitive detection systems have
resulted in an increased range of chromatographic capability.

     Chormatography can be characterized as a separation method based on the
differential migration of solutes through a system of two phases, one of which
is mobile.  The basis of the chromatographic separation is the distribution
(or partition) of the sample components between two phases, which are
immiscible.  Chromatographic methods are classified either according to the
type of mobile and stationary phases utilized or according to the mechanism
of retention.  A description of many modes of chromatography is presented in
Table C-8.  Ion-exchange chromatography has been used extensively in the
separation of amino acids, and more recently, in the separation of nucleic
acid components (155).  It was, therefore, closely examined as background for
this study.  Paired-ion chromatography, previously applied to inorganic
compounds, has also been used successfully in the separation of very polar
compounds (156).  In this method a large organic counter-ion added to the
mobile phase forms a reversible ion-pair complex with the ionized sample.
This complex behaves as an electrically neutral and non-polar (lipophilic)
compound.  The extent to which the ionized sample and the counter-ion form
an ion-pair complex affects the degree of retention obtained (157).  Reversed
phase adsorption chromatography has also been shown to be useful (155).

     Amino acids commonly found in protein hydrolysates, physiological fluids
(90) and standard amino acid mixtures (90,158) have been resolved at the
picomole level using HPLC with fluorescence detection.  Dr. R. Jolley and Dr.
W. Pitt have made significant progress in the separation and identification
of trace compounds in urine (159), primary and secondary stages of municipal
sewage treatment plants, and natural waters (53,79,82), using a strongly
basic anion-exchange resin (Bio Rad Aminex A-27) with (ammonium acetate)


                                    315

-------
                               TABLE C-8.  MODES OF CHROMATOGRAPHY
Stationary Phase
                                                     Mobile Phase
Non Polar Liquid
                                                                             Polar Liquid
polar solid
non-polar solid
      solid surface coated with a
to     polar liquid

      solid surface coated with a
      non-polar liquid

      ion-exchange resin with either
      acidic or basic mobile counter-
      ions

      non-polar solid
porous packing gel
normal phase liquid-solid
chromatography  a
                                  normal phase liquid-liquid
                                  chromatography
                                     reversed phase liquid-solid
                                     chromatography
                                                                       reverse phase liquid-liquid
                                                                       chromatography

                                                                       ion exchange chromatography
                                     paired-ion exchange chromato-
                                     graphy

gel permeation chromatography or exclusion chromatography
  also called adsorption chromatography

-------
 (acetic  acid) buffer  as  eluant.  A summary of  the  chromatographic supports
 used  to  separate various mixtures of nitrogenous organic compounds is  shown
 in Table C-9.

      Different modes  of  operation and chromatographic columns were evaluated
 in this  study, including:  cation-exchange chromatography  (Zipax SCX,  DuPont
 Company),  anion-exchange chromatography  (Aminex A-27, Bio  Rad Laboratories),
 paired-ion chromatography  (Zorbax CN, DuPont Company), reversed-phase  chroma-
 tography (Zorbax C8,  DuPont Company), and normal-phase chromatography  (Corasil
 II, Waters Associates).  Zipax SCX is a  strongly acidic, cation exchanger
 consisting of a sulfonated fluorocarbon  polymer bonded to  spherical glass
 microbeads nominally  30  microns in diameter  (190,186).  These beads have a
 surface  are of 0.8-1.0 m2/g.  It can be  used only  with water solutions having
 pH values  ranging from 2-9.  Ionic strength has the greatest effect on solute
 retention.

      Zorbax particles are tiny, uniform, silica-sol beads  which have been
 produced by agglutination in a polymerization  process.  Zorbax C8 is a re-
 versed-phase packing  for compounds with  moderate to high polarity and  can
 also  be  used in paired-ion chromatography.  Zorbax CN is a polar-bonded phase
 for both normal and reversed phase chromatography  (190,157).  Aminex A-27 is
 a  porous,  moderately  cross-linked, polystyrene based, quarternary ammonium
 type  strong anion exchange resin.  Corasil II  is a normal-phase column packing
 consisting of a solid glass bead core with either  single or double porous
 silica layers.

      Eluted compounds have been detected by various methods including:
 refractive index, ultraviolet and fluorescence absorbance, heat of adsorption,
 electrolytic conductivity, flame ionization, polarography, and dielectric
 constant monitoring.  Because of its relatively high sensitivity to most
 solutes  and its insensitivity to changes in temperature, flow rate, and mobile
 phase composition, ultraviolet adsorption is the most widely used method with
 HPLC.  When ultraviolet detection is used at very  short wavelengths, near
 200 nm,  it  becomes a general non-specific detector, since  almost all compounds
 exhibit  very strong adsorption in the far U.V. (192).

      Identification of a resolved chromatographic  peak may be accomplished by:
 1) elution position;  2) U.V. spectrum;  3) fluorescence spectrum;  4) nmr
 spectrum;   5)  internal standard;  6) isotopic  labeling;  7) enzymatic  peak
 shift techniques; and  8) derivatization methods.  Positive identification
 usually  requires corroborative evidence  from several identification methods.
 The probability of correct identification increases with each additional unit
 of information that shows correspondence between the unknown and known
 reference  standards.  Katz and Pitt (159) have recently developed a new
 liquid chromatography detector which depends upon  the fluorescence measure-
ment of cerium III produced from the reaction  of cerium IV with eluted
 reducible compounds.  It was reported to be more sensitive than previous
 oxidative detectors by more than a factor of 100.  Gomez and others (193) have
begun to try to develop a sensitive method involving dual-beam Fourier trans-
 form infrared  spectrosocopy for the on-line identification of organic water
pollutants separated by high pressure liquid chromatography.
                                     317

-------
                     TABLE C-9.  HPLC SEPARATION OF NITROGENOUS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
      Compounds
                         Column
Mobile phase
                                                                                    Reference
u>
M
00
      nucleic acid bases
      nucleic acid bases
                         Zorbax CN
                         paired-ion
                         chromatography

                         Zipax SCXa
nucleic acid hydrolysis  XAD-4 support
products:  purines,      coated with triethyl-
pyrimidines, nucleo-     ammonium bicarbonate
sides, RNA hydroly-
zates, nucleotides
     nucleosides
     nucleotides
     nucleosides and bases
     in serum and plasma

     nucleosides and their
     bases
Aminex A-28b


Spherisorb 10 if



uBondapak C.g^


liBondapak C10
           lo
                                                       propionic acid with heptane  DuPont Co.  (160)
                                                       sulfonic acid
0.01 HNO.
                                                                                    Kirkland  (161)
                                                       linear gradient, 0.1-0.4 M   Vematsu and Suhadolnik
                                                       triethylammonium bicarbonate  (162)
                                                 Na Borate at pH 3-9 with
                                                 varying molarity

                                                 tetra-n-butylammonium
                                                 hydrogen sulfate and 10-
                                                 camphorsulfonic acid pH 3.9

                                                 KH2P04 pH 5.5 60/40 MeOH/
                                                 H20

                                                 .01 F KH2P04  pH 5.5
                                                 MeOH-H20 gradient (80/20)
                             Schneider and Glazko
                              (163)

                             Hoffman and Llao (164)
                             Strop £t ail. (165)


                             Hartwick and Brown (166)
                                                                            (continued)

-------
                                              TABLE C-9.  (continued)
      Compounds
Column
Mobile phase
Reference
UJ
(-•
VO
      amlno acids with         DC-AA
      fluorescamine detection
                        Na  citrate buffers
                             Georgladls  and  Coffey
                             (90)
      dansyl amlno acids
      dansyl amino acids
      amino acids
      urinary constituents
      urinary U.V.  adsorb-
      ing metabolites
      urine amlno acids
Micropak MCH-IO*1
Ion pairing technique
      dansyl amino acids       Micropak-NH4-KT
Particil PAC
Poragel PN*
Vydac polar phase1

resin coated glass
beads Poracil C
Corasil 11°

BioRad A-15
BioRad A-2?b
Zerolit
Aminex A-7
buffered MeOH/H20  0.01 M    Ellis and Garcia  (174)
(CH3)4 NCI counter ion
source

dichloromethane-acetic       Johnson e_t al.  (175)
acid (99:l)/acetonitrile-
acetic acid (90:10) gradient

acetonitrile-water-acetic    Hsu and Currie  (224)
acid
distilled and delonized
water  pH = 6
Grushka and Scott (176)
ammonium acetate-acetic      Mrochek ej^ al_.  (177)
acid buffer pH 4.28 (0.015 -
6 M)

acetic acid-ammonium acetate Geeraerts e± al.  (178)
(pH 4.4) varying from .015 -
6 M

sodium acetate-acetic acid   Hamilton  (179)
buffer, pH 4.4; .015 - 6 M
                                                                            (continued)

-------
                                              TABLE  C-9.  (continued)
     Compounds
                         Column
                        Mobile phase
                             Reference
u>
IS}
o
purlne nucleotide,       uBondapak
nucleoslde and base
metabolites from
biological extracts
adenosine in the pre-
sence of other nucleic
acid components

amino acids and amlno
sugars

fluorescamine
derivatized amino
acids

0-phthalaldehyde
derivatives of amino
acids

amlno acids as dansyl
derivatives with fluoro-
metric detection

ninhydrin chromagens
of amino acids

dansyl amlno acids
                              uBondapak
                              Aminex A-6
Durrum DC-1A
                              Aminex A-6
                              LiChrosorb SI60'
                              LiChrosorb RP8

                                       g
                              Technicon  chromo-
                              beads,  type B

                              Zipax Ra
                                                      .05  M ammonium dihydrogen    Anderson and Murphy (167)
                                                      phosphate  buffer
                        .007 F KH2P04  l^O/MeOH      Hartwick and Brovm  (168)
                        gradient
                        sodium citrate buffers of    Hadzija and Keglevic (169)
                        varying pH
citrate buffers pH 3.28
and 4.25
Stein et al.  (170)
                        citrate buffers:  pH 3.2,    Roth and Hampal (171)
                        4.25, and 6.4
                        benzene-pyridine-acetic      Bayer et_ al. (172)
                        acid mixture
                        citrate buffers  pH 2.88     Ellis and Garcia
                        and 5.00

                        methyl ethel ketone with     Frei and Lawrence (158)
                        light petroleum
                                                                            (continued)

-------
                                              TABLE  C-9.  (continued)
      Compounds
                         Column
Mobile Phase
Reference
OJ
      serum and  urine
      components
human urine, blood
serum, cerebrospinal
fluid, and amniotic
fluid

U.V. absorbing con-
stituents of human
urine

acidic urinary
constituents
      U.V.  absorbing
      constituents of
      human urine

      dansyl polyamlne
      derivatives

      complex biological
      mixture
      aromatic bases
                         Aminex A-27
                               Amlnex A-27
                               Aminex BRX1
                               LiChrosorb ODS
                         BloRad AGI-18
                         MicroPak CH-10
                         Aminex A-27
                         Aminex A-6
sodium acetate-acetic
acid buffer, pH 4.4;
.014 - 6 M

sodium acetate-acetic
acid buffer, pH 4.4;
.014 - 6 M
sodium acetate-acetic
acid buffer, pH 4.4;
.014 - 6 M

increasing acetonitrlle
concentration in dilute
acid solution

sodium acetate-acetic
acid buffer, pH 4.4;
.015 - 6 M
             •
water/acetonitrlie
gradient

sodium acetate-acetic
acid buffer, pH 4.4;
.015 - 6 M
Katz et al.  (180)
Katz et al.  (180)
Burtis  (181)
Molnar and Horvath  (182)
                                                                                    Scott  (183)
Johnson et al.  (175)
                                                                              Scott et al. (155)
                          Zipax  SCX
water with 0.15 M NaN03      DuPont Co (184)
                                                                            (continued)

-------
                                              TABLE C-9.  (continued)
        Compounds
                         Column
Mobile Phase
References
u>
NJ
        cyanopyridines
        Neuroamines,
        phene thylamines,
        B-hydroxyphenethyl,
        amine and indoleamines

        aza arenes
aromatic amlne
carcinogens

Caffeine in coffee

organic constituents
in primary and secon-
dary sewage treat-
ment plant effluents

trace organic compounds
in municipal sewage
effluent

organic halogen pro-
ducts in chlorinated
municipal sewage
effluents
                         Zipax  SCX
                         Zlpax SCX
yBondapak ,C-18
V Porasild

Zipax SCX


Zlpax SCX

strong cation-
exchange column
                                Amiriex A-27
                                Amlnex A-27
water with 0.10 NaNC>3
and 0.1 N
ammonium phosphate pH 7
Talley  (185)


McMurtrey (186)
                             Dong and Locke  (187)


0.1 ammonium acetate buffer  Mefford et al.  (188)
                                                 20-80% CH3CN in water
                                                 1% propanol in hexane
                                                         0.01 M nitric acid
sodium acetate-acetic
acid buffer, pH 4.4;
.015 - 6 M

sodium acetate-acetic
acid buffer, pH 4.4;
.015 - 6 M
Madison et al. (189)

Jolley et al. (82)




Pitt elt al (39)



Jolley et al. (84)
                                                                            (continued)

-------
                                              TABLE  C-9.  (continued)
      Compounds
                         Column
                        Mobile Phase
                             Reference
CO
N>
LJ
      trace organic compounds  C.._ pBondapak
      organic compounds        uPorasil
      extracted from drinking
      water by adsorption onto uBondapak
      XAD macroreticular resins
tryptophan and some of
its metabolites in
biological fluids

benzamide, benzene-
sulfonamlde, or 4-
methoxybenzamide
derivatives or primary
and secondary amine
compounds

dansyl amino acids
      amlno acids and
      aromatic amlno
      acid derivatives
                               Spherisorb ODS
uBondapak C
                                          18
                               yBondapak
                               Spherisorb 50DS
                         Amberlite CG-120
                         Type IIIb
20-100% acetonitrile
in water

hexane to chloroform +
  hexnne gradient
hexane to ethanol +
  hexane gradient

50% MeOH + 50% paired
ion chromatographic
solution

mixtures of water and
MeOH or acetonitrile
                        linear gradient formed
                        from acetonitrile and
                        sodium phosphate
                        buffers (neutral pH)

                        gradient from pH = 3.25
                        to 4.25 to 7.70 using
                        sodium citrate or
                        Borax
                                                                              Hites and Biemann (36,
                                                                              37)

                                                                              Thurston  (226)
                                                     Riley et al.  (227)
Clark and Wells (228)
                             Wilkinson  (229)
                             Ohtsuki and Hatano (230)
                                                                            (continued)

-------
                                              TABLE C-9.  (continued)
       Compounds
Column
Mobile phase
Reference
LO
N>
JJ-
       amlno  acids
      mono-, di-f  and
      trlphosphate
      nucleotides  of
      adenlne,  guanine,
      hypoxanthine, xanthine,
      uracil,  thymine  and
      cytosine
Durrum DC-6A
Partisil 10-SAX1
citrate buffers (pH
3.2, 3.5, and 4.0)

.007 F KH2POA and .007
F KC1 (pH 4.0) to 0.25 F
KH2P04 and 0.50 F KC1
(pll 5.0) gradient
Kasiske et al.  (231)
McKeag and Brown  (232)
          DuPont Company, Wilmington,  Delaware
          Bio Rad Laboratories, Richmond, California
          Spectra Physics, Santa  Clara,  California
          Waters Associates, Milford,  Massachusetts
          Durrum Chemical Company, Palo  Alto, California
          Merck, A.G., Darmstadk, Germany
          Technicon Industrial Systems,  Tarrytown, New York
          Varlan Associates, Palo Alto,  California
          Whatman Inc., Clifton,  New Jersey
          Separation Group, Hesperia,  California
          Permutit, London, Great Britain
          Jones Chromatography Ltd., Llanbradach, United  Kingdom

-------
      Fluorescence  spectroscopy has long been a valuable method of analysis
 because  of  its  enhanced sensitivity and selectivity over conventional ab-
 sorbance spectroscopy.  Luminescence phenomea include fluorescence, phosphor-
 escence,  chemiluminescence, triboluminescence, and electroluminescence.
 Fluorescence and phosphorescence are the emission of long wave light following
 absorption  of short excitation wavelength energy.  If the energy emission
 ceases in about 10~8 seconds after the excitation source is removed the
 phenomenon  is called fluorescence.  If the energy emission persists for a
 longer time than this, the term phosphorescence is used (194)

          Many  organic compounds either display natural fluorescence or can be
 made  fluorescent by derivatization.  Classes of naturally fluorescing compounds
 include:  catecholamines, polycyclic aromatics, drugs, vitamins, nucleotides,
 prophyrins, flavins, purines, pyrimidines, coenzymes, dyes and steroids (195).
 Table C-10  shows luminescence data for a number of nitrogenous organic
 compounds.  The emissions of the purines, pyrimidines, nucleotides, and nucleic
 acids themselves are weak, especially at ambient temperatures (196).  Most
 amino acids do not fluoresce to any appreciable extent (194).  Tyrosine,
 tryptophan  and phenylalanine however, do have fluorescent properties (197).

     The  fluorescence adsorption and emission spectra of solutes in solution
 depend greatly on  several parameters including:  solvent polarity, pH,
 presence  of non-aqueous acids or bases in organic solvents, anion presence
 (Cl~, Br~,  I~, and NOI), and solute concentration (194).  Aniline, for example,
 fluoresces  intensely in neutral form at pH 7 but is non-fluorescent in its
 protonated  form at acid pH (196).

     Sensitivity in response by two or three orders of magnitude greater than
 conventional ultraviolet spectroscopy can be expected from fluorescing com-
 pounds or fluorescent derivatives (195).  In addition, enhanced peak identi-
 fication  is possible through fluorescence excitation and emission spectra
 using stopped flow techniques.  Sylvia et at, (200) reported a strong
 correlation (mean correlation coefficient equal to 0.92) between carbon chloro-
 form extract (CCE) and luminescence values obtained on a fluorescence spectro-
 photometer at selected wavelengths.  The authors were unable to define the
 actual compound or group of compounds responsible for the fluorescent response
 at the selected wavelength.

     Weigele et al. (201)  recently synthesized a novel fluorogenic reagent,
 fluorescamine (fluram:  4 phcnylspiro-[furan-2 (3H), l'phthalan]-3,3'dione)
which reacts very rapidly at room temperature with primary amines to yield
highly fluorescent pyrrolinone derivatives which can be measured at picomole
 levels.   This fluorometric method was further developed by Udenfriend (202)
and has since then been used by many other researchers (170,175,192,203-205).
Fluorescamine reaction with primary amines proceeds at room temperature with
a half time at pH 9 of  about 200-500 milliseconds for most amino acids (170).
Excess reagent is hydrolyzed within seconds to water soluble nonfluorescing
furanones (195).  Fluorescamine,  as well as its hydrolysis products, is not
fluorescent.  It reacts directly with amines to form stable fluorophors (390
excitation,  475 emission)  whose intensity is linear with the concentration of
reactant  amine (170,202).   Kroll et al.  (206) found enhanced detection of
naturally fluorescent compounds and fluorescent derivatives at excitation


                                      325

-------
              TABLE C-10.   LUMINESCENCE DATA FOR A NUMBER OF NITROGENOUS ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
t-o
Compound
adenine
adenoslne
alanine
aniline
aspartic acid
l-aspartic acid
J£-aspartic acid
barbituric acid
Fluorescence (F)
Phosphorescence (P)
Solvent Luminescence (L) A A Comments Reference
ex em
glycol-water
water-MeOH
powdered
glycol-water
EtOH
powdered
original state
original state
water at pH 7
water at pH 7
original state
original state
original state
original state
NaOH
NH40H
H2S04
F
P
L
F
P
L
L
L
F
F
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
294 * - 0.06
278 406 DL - 0.02
260-280 355
296-313 355
315 * - 0.003
280 422 LD = 0.001
260-280 375
296-313 375
320-395 white
253 phosphoresces
280 344 fair
291 361 fair
320-395 slate
365 medium purple-
blue
365 purplish white
320-395 whitish-violet
320-295 light green
320-395 violet
320-395 violet
(197)
(196)
(199)
(197)
(196)
(199)
(198)
(198)
(196)
(196)
(198)
(198)
(198)
(198)
(198)
(198)
(198)
                                                                             (continued)

-------
                                               TABLE C-10.  (continued)
       Compound
u>
N3
-J
Solvent
Fluoresence (F)
Phosphorescence (P)
Luminescence (L)
                                                                               em
                                                                                       Comments   Reference
caffeine


6-chloropurlne
cytosine



guanine






Indole




EtOH
original state
alkali
water-methanol
glycol-water (1:1)
powdered

original state
glycol-water
powdered

original state
NaOH
NH^OH
sulphuric acid
water pH 7
dime thylsulf oxide
original state
original state
sulphuric acid
P
L
L
P
F
L
L
L
F
L

L
L
L
L
F
F
P
L
L
285 440 DL = 0.2
320-395 bluish white
320-395 green
273 419 DL = 0.002
312 * = 0.06
260-280 400
296-313 400
365 blue-violet
320 * - 0.06
260-280 370
296-313 370
320-395 purple
320-395 light green
320-395 violet
320-395 violet
269 or 315 350
335 » - 0.42
404
365 violet- blue
365 green
(196)
(198)
(198)
(196)
(197)
(199)

(198)
(198)
(199)

(198)
(198)
(198)
(198)
(196)
(196)
(197)
(198)
(198)
                                                                             (continued)

-------
                                              TABLE C-10.  (continued)
       Compound
Solvent
Fluorescence (F)
Phosphorescence (P)
Luminescence (L)
                                                                   ex
                                                                             em
Comments   Reference
00
nucleic acid

nucleotide
phenylalanine





purlnes


pyrimidine




pyrrole


NaOH
NH^OH
HC1
water
EPA
0.5% glucose
in water, original
state
original state
original state
original state
EPA
water-methanol
original state
original state
water
original state

original state
original state
EtOH
L
L
L
L
F
F
F

F
F
F
P
L
L
L
L
F

F
L
L
365 yellow green
365 yellow green
365 yellow green
320-395


250-300


258,205
250-275

272
320-395
320-395
320-395
298

240,207
320-395
320-395
283-380
285
290
282 small quantum
yield
280


357
405 DL - 0.01
yellowish
330-480
310-480
326 low quantum
yield

400-480
310-480
(198)
(198)
(198)
(198)
(197)
(197)
(196)

(197)
(199)
(196)
(197)
(196)
(198)
(198)
(198)
(197)

(197)
(198)
(198)
                                                                            (continued)

-------
                                              TABLE C-10.  (continued)
       Compound
Solvent
Fluorescence (F)
Phosphorescence (P)
Luminescence (L)
                                                                    ex
                                                                               em
Comments   Reference
N3
pyridine
2-thiouracil
thymlne


Cryptophan
















EtOH
EtOH
powdered
powdered
glycol-water (1:1)
original state
original state
original state
original state
EPA
original state
original state
original state
water pH 2.0
water
ethanol
0.5% glucose
in water,
0.5% glucose in water
EPA
original state
phosphoric acid
P
P
L
L
F
F
P
F
P
F
F
F
F
F
F
P
P

F
P
L
L
310
296
260-280
296-313

350
350
280
280

280
250-300

280,218

295




320-395
320-395
440 DL = .0001
510 DL = 0.02
310
395
316
450
500
350
500
325
315
348
350 » - 0.20

348
440 DL - 0.002
435

330
490
grey
greenish
(196)
(196)
(199)
(199)
(197)
(197)
(197)
(197)
(197)
(197)
(194)
(196)
(197)
(199)
(199)
(196)
(197)

(197)
(197)
(198)
(198)
                                                                             (continued)

-------
                                              TABLE C-10. (continued)
       Compound
Solvent
Fluorescence (F)

Phosphorescence (P)

Luminescence (L)
                                                                   ex
X        Comments   Reference
 em
w
U)
o
tyrosine













fc-tyrosine
uracil






urea
original state
original state
water pH 2
water pH 12
aqueous
original state
EPA
0.5% glucose in water
EPA
0.5% glucose in water
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
original state
original state
powdered
powdered
original state
NaOH
NH^OH
H£S04
glycol-water
original state
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
F
P
P
P
P
P
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
280
250-300
275,222
295,240
270



395
395
253
291
290
320-395
365
260-280
296-313
365
365
365
365

320-395
308
303



300 * - 0.21
305
300


394 DL - 0.02
390 DL - 0.02
389 DL ='0.02
purple
strong rose-white
355
430
violet
light green
blue-violet
blue-violet
315 » - 0.008
grey
(194)
(196)
(199)
(199)
(199)
(197)
(197)
(197)
(197)
(197)
(196)
(196)
(196)
(198)
(198)
(199)
(199)
(198)
(198)
(198)
0198)
(197)
(198)
                                                                            (continued)

-------
                                              TABLE C-10.  (continued)
     Compound
                   Solvent
Fluorescence (F)
Phosphorescence (P)
Luminescence (L)
                                                                 ex
                                                                            en
Comments   Reference
    uric  acid
                   original state
                        320-295  medium violet
             (197)
LO
Solvent abbreviations:

   MeOH - methanol
   original state - compound In its original and unaltered state
   EtOH - ethanol; NaOH - sodium hydroxide; HC1 - hydrochloric acid
   EPA - mixture of ethanol, isopentane, and ether usually in the proportion of 2:5:5
   NH^OH - ammonium hydroxide
         ex
        Lem
         excitation wavelength; DeMent (199) reported U.V. values only as "U.V.11 but indicated
         that this most likely represented values of 320-395 nm.

         emission wavelength; DeMent (199) reported color of emitted light.  Approximate wavelengths
         are:  ultraviolet •» 4'M nm      violet = 400-450 nm       blue = 450-500 nm    green » 500-570 nm
               yellow = 570-590 nm       orange = 590-620 nm       red = 520-760 nm     infra red =>760 nm
       Comments:   DL  =  limit of detection in yg/mL
                    *  =  quantum yield  (or efficiency)  where:
                                       	number of fluorescence quanta emitted	
                                       number of quanta absorbed to a singlet excited state
                                   (0 < * < 1)

-------
wavelengths below  250 nm but  did not  investigate fluorescamine derivatives.
Fluorescamine has  the added advantage of not being reactive with ammonia or
urea  (201,204), although Georidis  and Coffey (90) reported a small amount of
fluorescence resulting  from ammonia contamination in  the buffers used in their
fluorometric system.  Because of the  extreme sensitivity to fluorescent con-
taminants all sampling  equipment and  analytical glassware must be washed in
dilute hydrochloric acid and  carefully rinsed prior to use (90,204).  Primary
amine compounds capable of forming potentially fluorescing derivatives with
fluorescamine include:  alanine, aspartic acid, adenine, m-aminophenol,
creatine, cytosine, glycine,  glycylglycine, histidine, leucine, serine,
taurine, tryptophan, and tyrosine.

     The utility of fluorescamine  was more recently expanded by Weigele et ai.
(207), who reported that proline and  other secondary  amino acids could be
transformed into fluorescamine responsive primary amines via oxidative
decarboxylation with N-chlorosuccinimide.  Felix and  Terkelson (205) incor-
porated N-chlorosuccinimide and fluorescamine reagents into a fluorometric
analyzer capable of detecting both primary and secondary amine compounds.
The presence of 0.05 M  hydrochloric acid in the N-chlorosuccinimide solution
was required to achieve pH 2  for the  oxidation of the secondary amines.

     Derivatization may be accomplished either before or after the chromato-
graphic column.  In post-column derivatization the physical properties of the
underivatized solutes determine their characteristic  retention.  In pre-
column derivatization the retention values result from the properties of the
derivatized solute.  Although it is often assumed that pre-column derivati-
zation tends to make a  chromatographic separation more difficult, Johnson et
at. (175) suggested that in many instances it may lead to enhanced selectivity.


KJELDAHL AND AMMONIA DETERMINATIONS

     The indophenol-hypochlorite reaction for the measurement of ammonia
utilizes the sensitive  method of Berthelot (208) and  Solorzano (209) in which
ammonia is converted to a deep-blue colored compound, indophenol, by reaction
with hypochlorite and phenol  in alkaline solution (191).  The intensity of the
blue colored indophenol, measured  at  635 nm, is proportional to the ammonia
concentration (210).  The phenol-hypochlorite reaction is extremely sensitive,
so that under optical conditions yg/1 levels of ammonia-nitrogen should be
determinable (191,211).  The  method has been modified (212) by introduction
of nitroprusside as catalyst.   This change accentuates the blue color at room
temperature.

     Total Kjeldahl nitrogen  includes ammonia and organic nitrogen but does
not include nitrite and nitrate-nitrogen without special modification.  It is
measured by determination of  ammonia  after decomposition of the organic
compounds to ammonia and COz  by either ultraviolet light or H2SOi» digestion.
Ultraviolet decomposition, although potentially sensitive, gives variable
recovery of organic nitrogen  and,  therefore, has not  been widely used (191).
Digestion mixtures containing a variety of catalysts  and concentrations of
potassium sulfate have  been reported  in the literature (210,211,191,213).
These are shown in Table C-ll.  Addition of potassium sulfate to the digestion


                                      332

-------
             TABLE C-ll.  DIGESTION MIXTURES REPORTED IN THE LITERATURE
Composition
Digestion time
Neutralized prior
to ammonia
determination
                                                                             Reference
0.1 g Se02; 500 ml H
diluted to one liter
with distilled water
H2S04; K2SO;
mercuric sulfate
0.2 g Se02; 20 g K2SO,
110 ml H2S04 diluted to
one liter with distilled
water
134 g K2S04; 200 ml
5 ml delenyl chloride
diluted to 1 liter with
distilled water
approximately
1.5 hours
                              approximately
                              1 hours
approximately
3.5 hours
approximately
1 hour
bromothymol blue
end point (pH 6.0-
7.6)

phenolphthalein
end point
(pH 8.3 - 10.0)

phenolphthalein
end point
neutralized to
pH 8 or 'higher'
                                                                             Strickland and Parsons
                                                                             C13;
                                               Mann  (2ii)
                                                                             Hague and Hague (191)
                                                                             Scheiner (214)

-------
mixture  raises the boiling point of the H2SOi».   The  presence of phenol-
phthalein  in the reaction mixture does not  affect the  final color  (191).
Strickland and Parsons (213)  caution that ultra-pure concentrated  acid must
be used  to ensure low blank values.

      There is considerable discussion in the literature  over the effect of
reagent  concentration, catalyst composition, temperature, reagent  sequence,
pH and development period on  the intensity  and  stability of the colored indo-
phenol (191,211,215).    Copper, selenium and manganese catalysts have been
employed (211,216,217).   Reliable and reproducible methods for determining
ammonia  and Kjeldahl  nitrogen in natural waters using  the indophenol hypo-
chlorite reaction, however, have been reported  (213,214).  Excellent repro-
ducibility was observed  by Scheiner (214) who found  the  maximum relative
difference between duplicate  determinations  to be ±1%.  Bolleter  (218)
reported standard deviations  of 0.03 ppm at a level  of 1 ppm of ammonia.

      Although Wearne  (210) reported that amino  acids have an inhibitory
effect on  the determination,  Strickland and Parsons  (213) found that urea and
several  amino acids in the concentration of 3 Mg at  N/L  in filtered sea water
caused negligible interference.  Cocking (219)  found that creatine and
creatinine at concentrations  of 5 mg/L each did not  interfere with the
indophenol-blue color  formation.   Bolleter  et al.  (218)  found that aliphatic
amines,  NaCl,  KN03, NaSOi,, and BaCl2 did not interfere.  Increased absorbance
resulted from the presence of copper,  zinc  and  iron  salts.  Interference also
resulted from the presence of aromatic amines.   Manabe (220) found that at
concentrations up to  5 mg/L none of 24 electrolytes  tested gave rise to any
significant  interference in the ammonia determination.   Of the 20 nitrogenous
compounds  tested  at 0.2  mg/L  amino acid nitrogen,  only fc-cystine, £-glutamic
acid, £-histidine,  £-methionine,  and Jl-phenylalanine showed interference, in
the range  of  5-13%.  All of these compounds,  however,  were at concentrations
substantially higher  than those normally found  in  water.  Similar results
were  reported by  other investigators studying interference effects of electro-
lytes, amino  acids and urea both in sea water and  fresh  water (209, 221-223).
                                    334

-------
                             APPENDICES REFERENCES


 1.   Slejko, F.L., and Neely, J.W.  A New Stream Regenerable Carbonaceous
      Absorbant for Removal of Halogenated Hydrocarbons from Water.  American
      Water Works Association Ohio Conference, Nov. 3-5, 1976.

 2.   Water Quality Criteria Data Book.  Vol. 1:  Organic Chemical Pollution of
      Freshwater, EPA Water Quality Office, Project No. 18010 DPV, Dec. 1970.

 3.   Junk, G.A., and Stanley, S.E.  Organics in Drinking Water.  Part I:
      Listings of Identified Chemicals, IS 3671, NTIS, July 1975.

 4.   Environmental Protection Agency Interim Primary Drinking Water Regula-
      tions:  Control of Organic Chemical Contaminants in Drinking Water.
      Federal Register, Thursday, Feb. 9, 1978, Part II.

 5.   Human Health Considerations of Carcinogenic Organic Chemical Contaminants
      in Drinking Water.  Position Paper, National Cancer Institute, National
      Institute of Health, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare,
      Bethesda, MD, April 1978.

 6.   Kraybill, H.F.  Origin, Classification, and Distribution of Chemicals in
      Drinking Water with an Assessment of their Carcinogenicity Potential.
      In:  Proceedings on Environmental Impact of Water Chlorination, Oak Ridge
      National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, Rept. Conf. 751096, October, 1975.

 7.   Kraybill, H.F.  The Distribution of Chemical Carcinogens in Aquatic
      Environments.  In: Proceedings of UICC Symposium, Cork, Irelant, 1974,
      Prog, in Exper. Tumor Res., ed, F. Hoberger, 20:3, Karger, Basel,
      Switzerland, 1976.

 8.   Kraybill, H.F., Helmes, C.T., and Sigman, C.C.  Biomedical Aspects of
      Biorefractories in Water, Second Inter. Symp. on Aquatic Pollutants,
      Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands, Sept. 26-28, 1977, in press.

 9.   Rook, J.J.   Formation of Haloforms During Chlorination of Natural Waters.
      Water Treatment Exam., 23:234-243, 1974.

10.   Bellar, T.A., Lichtenberg,  J.J., and Kroner, R.C.  The Occurrence of
      Organohalides in Finished Drinking Waters.  J. Amer. Water Works Assoc.,
      66:703-706, 1974.

11.   Environmental Protection Agency.  Drinking Water and Health, Recommenda-
      tion of the National Academy of Sciences.  Federal Register, Monday,
      July 11, 1977, Part III.

                                      335

-------
 12.   Heuper,  W.C.,  and Payne,  W.W.   Carcinogenic Effects  of  Adsorbates  of  Raw
      and  Finished Water Supplies,  The American Journal of Clinical  Pathology,
      39:5,  475-481,  1963.

 13.   Looper,  J.C.,  Lang,  D.R., and Smith,  C.C.  Mutagenicity of  Complex Mix-
      tures  from Drinking Water, Chapter 33.   In:  Water Chlorination:   Environ-
      mental Impact  and Health  Effects, Vol.  2, eds.  R.L.  Jolley  and H.  Gorchev,
      Ann  Arbor  Science, 1978.

 14.   Upton,  A.C.  National Cancer  Institute  Memo to  Dr. Douglas  Castle,
      Administrator  US Environmental Protection Agency, April 10,  1978.

 15.   U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Interim Report to Congress.   Pre-
      liminary Assessment of Suspected Carcinogens in Drinking Water (Appen-
      dices),  June 1975.

 16.   Kofpler, F.C.,  Melton, R.G.,  Mullaney,  J.L., and Tardiff, R.G. Human
      Exposure to Water Pollutants.   In:  Fate of Pollutants  in the  Air  and
      Water  Environment, Part 2. Chemical and Biological  Fate of  Pollutants in
      the  Environment,  Vol.  8.  ed.  I.H. Suffet, John  Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1977.

 17.   Will EPA Ignore Drinking  Water Cancer Research  Facts?  Chemecology, July
      1978,  p. 1.

 18.   Lazarus, J.  MCV Using EPA Funds to Dampen Water Plans.   Richmond-Times
      Dispatch,  Richmond,  VA, May 21,  1978.

 19.   Spangler,  R.M.   Community Relations, American Water  Works Association,
      July 1978.

 20.   Bozella, J.F.,  Professor  of Pharmacology, Head,  Division of  Toxicology.
      Letter  to  Jerry Lazarus of Richmond-Times Dispatch,  Richmond,  VA,  June
      1978,  in reply  to article of May 21, 1978,  see  ref.  18.

 21.   U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency.   Interim  Report to Congress.
      Preliminary Assessment of Suspected Carcinogens  in Drinking  Water,  June
      1975.

 22.   National Archives of  the  United  States.   Environmental  Protection Agency:
      Interim  Primary Drinking  Water Regulations.   Federal Register  40:248,
      Subpart  D: 59566-59587, Dec. 24,  1975.

 23.  Maier,  W.J., McConnell, H.L., and Conroy,  L.E.   A Survey of  Organic
     Carbon Constituents in Natural Freshwaters.   NTIS PB 236794, 1974.

24.  Birge,  E.A., and  Juday, C.  Organic Content  of Lake  Water.   Proc. Nat.
     Acad. Sciences, 12:515-519, 1926.

25.  Birge,  E.A., and  Juday, C.  Particulate and  Dissolved Organic  Matter in
     Inland Lakes.    Ecol. Monogr., 4:440-474,  1934.
                                     336

-------
 26.   Braus,  H.,  Middleton,  P.M.,  and Walton  G.   Organic  Chemical  Compounds in
      Raw and Filtered  Surface Waters.   Analyt.  Chem.  23(8):1160-1164,  Aug.
      1951.

 27.   Van Hall, C.E.,   J.  Safranko,  and  V.A.  Stenger.   Rapid  Combustion Method
      for the Determination  of Organic Substances in Aqueous  Solutions.   Anal.
      Chem.,  35(3):315-319,  1963.

 28.   Nelson,  K.H., and I. Lysyj.  Organic Content of  Southwest  and Pacific
      Coast Municipal Waters.  Environ.  Sci.  Technol.  2(l):61-62,  1968.

 29.   Borneff, J.  Die  Entfernung  kanzerogener,  polyzyklischer Aromaten bei der
      Wasseraufbereitung.  Das Gas und Wasserfach.  110(2):29-34,  10  Jan.  1969.

 30.   Borneff, J., F. Selenka, H.  Kunte, and  A.  Maximos.  Experimental  Studies
      on  the  Formation  of  Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Plants.   Environ.
      Res. 2:22-29, 1968.

 31.   Takemura, N., T.  Akiama, and C. Najima.  A Survey of the Pollution of the
      Sumida  River, Especially on  the Aromatic Amines  in  the  Water.   Int.  J.
      Air Water Pollution, 9(10):665-670, Oct. 1965.

 32.   Sweet,  B.H.  Identification  of Hazardous Materials, Lower  Mississippi
      River.  Progress  Report, U.S. Public Health Service, October 1970.

 33.   Community Water Supply Study.  Analysis of  National Survey Finding.
      Bureau  of Water Hygiene, U.S. Public Health Service, July  1970.

 34.   Friloux, J.  Petrochemical Wastes as a  Pollution  Problem in the Lower
      Mississippi River.  EPA Report, Water Quality Office, Lower Mississippi
      Basin Office, Baton Rouge, LA, 1971.

 35.   Industrial Pollution of the  Lower Mississippi River in  Louisiana.   En-
     vironmental Protection Agency, April 1972.

 36.  Hites,  R.A. and K. Biemann.  Computer Evaluation  of Continuously  Scanned
     Mass Spectra of Gas Chromatographic Effluents.  Analytical Chemistry,
     42(8):855-860,  1970.

 37.  Hites,  R.A., and K. Biemann.  Mass Spectrometer-Computer System Particular
     Suited for Gas Chromatography of Complex Mixtures.  Analytical Chemistry,
     40(8):1217-1219, 1968.

38.  Malcolm, R.L.,  and J.A. Leenheer.   The Usefulness of Organic Carbon
     Parameters in Water Quality  Investigations.  In:  Proceedings of the  Ana-
     heim, California Meeting of  the Institute of Environmental Science,  Ana-
     heim, CA, Institute of  Environ. Sci.,  336-340, 1973.

39.  Pitt, W.W.,  R.L. Jolley,  and C.D.  Scott.  Determination of Trace Organics
     in Municipal Sewage Effluents and  Natural Waters by High Resolution  Ion
     Exchange Chromatography.   Environmental Sciences and Technology, 9(12):
     1068-1073,  1975.

                                     337

-------
40.   Symons,  J.M.   U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.   National  Organics
      Reconnaissance Survey for Halogenated Organics  in Drinking  Water.  Water
      Supply  Research Lab., National Environmental Research Center,  Office of
      Research and  Development, Cincinnati, OH,  April 1975.

41.   Committee Report.   Organic Contaminants in Water Supplies.   Journal of
      the  American  Water  Works Association, 67(8):418-424,  1975.

42.   Mullaney,  J.L.   Organic Compounds Identified in the  U.S.  Safety/Hazard
      Evaluation File, update to April 1975,  Compiled by the Water Quality
      Division,  Health Effects Research Lab., EPA, Cincinnati,  OH, 1975.

43.   Suffet,  I.H.   GC/MS Identification of Trace Organic  Compounds  in Phila-
      delphia  Waters.  In:   Identification and Analysis of  Organic Pollutants
      in Water,  ed.  L.H.  Kieth, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI,  1976.

44.   Chian, E.S.K.   Monitoring to Detect Previously  Unrecognized Pollutants in
      Water.   5  Quarterly Reports, U.S. Environmental Protection  Agency Contract
      No.  68-01-3234,  1976.

45.   Pitt, W.W., R.L. Jolley, and S.  Katz.  Separation and  Analysis of Re-
      fractory Pollutants in Water by  High-Resolution Liquid Chromatography.
      Chapter  14.   In:  Identification and Analysis of Organic  Pollutants in
      Water, ed.  L.H.  Kieth,  Ann Arbor Science,  Ann Arbor,  MI,  1976.

46.   Coleman,  W.E.   The  Occurrence of Volatile  Organics in Five  Drinking Water
      Supplies Using  Gas  Chromatography/Mass  Spectrometry.   In:   Identification
      and  Analysis  of  Organic Pollutants in Water, ed.  L.H.  Kieth, Ann Arbor
      Science,  Ann  Arbor,  MI, 1976.

47.   Kieth, L.H.   Identification of Organic  Compounds in Drinking Water from
      13 U.S.  Cities.  In:   Identification and Analysis of  Organic Pollutants
      in Water,  ed.  L.H.  Kieth, Ann Arbor Science, Ann Arbor, MI,  1976.

48.   Newell,  L.I.  Naturally Occurring Organic  Substances  in Surface Waters
      and  Effect  of  Chlorination.  J.  of the  New England Water  Works Association
      90(4):315-341,  1976.

49.   Environmental Protection Agency.  Monitoring to Detect Previously Unre-
      cognized Pollutants in Surface Water.  Office of Toxic Substance, EPA,
      Washington, D.C., PB273349, July 1977.

50.   Safe Drinking Water Act.  Public Law 93-523, 93rd Congress,  S. 433, Dec.
      16,  1974.

51.   Hoehn, R.C.,  R.P. Goode, and C.W. Randall.   Chlorination  and Water Treat-
      ment for Minimizing Trihalomethanes in  Drinking Water.  Chapter 39.  In:
      Water Chlorination,  Environmental Impact and Health Effects, Vol. 2, eds.
      R.L. Jolley and H.  Gorchev, Ann  Arbor Science,  Ann Arbor, MI,  1977.

52.   The National Organic  Monitoring  Survey.  Technical Support  Division,
      Office of Water Supply,  U.S.  EPA, 1977.


                                      338

-------
53.  Jolley, R.L., and W.W. Pitt,  Jr.  Nonvolatile Organics in Disinfected
     Effluents.  Presented before  the Division of Environmental Chemistry,
     American Chemical Society, New Orleans, LA, March 20-27, 1977.

54.  Baum, B.  The Formation of Chlorinated Organic Compounds in the Chlori-
     nation of Natural and Polluted Waters, Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University,
     Cambridge, MA, June 1978.

55.  Tarras, M.J.  Preliminary Studies on the Chlorine Demand of Specific
     Chemical Compounds.  J. of Amer. Water Work Assoc., 42:462-474, 1950.

56.  Guter, K.J., W.J. Cooper, and C.A. Sorber.  Evaluation of Existing Field
     Test Kits for Determining Free Chlorine Residuals in Aqueous Solutions.
     J. Amer. Water Works Assoc.,  66:38-43, 1974.

57.  Wajon, J.E., and J.C. Morris.  The Analysis of Free Chlorine in the
     Presence of Nitrogenous Organic Compounds.  Presented at the American
     Chemical Society National Meeting, Anaheim, CA, March 13-17, 1978.

58.  Gould, J.  Evidence that Chlorination May Form Mutagens.  Chemical and
     Engineering News, p. 33, March 27, 1978.

59.  Rosen, B., R. Rothman, and M.G. Miscoding Caused by 5-Fluorouracil.  J.
     of Molecular Biology, 44(2):363-375, 14 Sept. 1969.

60.  Research Proposal.  Fate of Cooling-Water Chlorination Products in the
     Aquatic Environment.  Submitted to Div. of Biomedical and Environmental
     Research, Dept. of Energy, Washington, D.C. by Life Sciences Div., Syra-
     cuse Research Corp., Merrill  Lane, Univ. Heights, Syracuse, NY, Dec. 1977.

61.  Dunn, D.B., and J.D. Smith.  Incorporation of Halogenated Pyrimidines
     into the Deoxyribonucleic Acids of Bacterium Coli and its Bacteriophages.
     Nature, 174(4424):305-306, Aug. 14, 1954.

62.  Dunn, D.B., and J.D. Smith.  Effects of 5-Halogenated Uracils on the
     Growth of Escherichia Coli and Their Incorporation into Deoxyribonucleic
     Acids.  Biochem. J. 67:494-506, 1957.

63.  Roy-Burman, P..  Analogs of Nucleic Acid Components.  Springer-Verlag,
     New York, 1970.

64.  Jolley, R.L.  Chlorination Effects on Organic Constituents in Effluents
     From Domestic Sanitary Sewage Treatment Plants.  Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of
     Tennessee, Aug. 1973.

65.  Southworth, G.R., and C.W. Gehrs.  Photolysis of 5-Chlorouracil in
     Natural Waters.  Water Research 10:967-971, 1976.

66.  Gehrs, C.W., L.D. Eyman, R.L. Jolley, and J.E. Thompson.  Effects of
     Stable Chlorine-Containing Organics on Aquatic Environments.  Nature,
     249(5458):675-676, June 14, 1974.
                                     339

-------
67.  Eyman, L.D.,  C.W.  Gehrs,  and Beauchamp.   Sublethal Effect of 5-Chloro-
     uracil on Carp  (Cyprinus  Carpio) Larvae.  J.  Fis. Res. Bd. Canada, 32(11):
     2227-2229,  1975.

68.  Magee, P.N.,  R. Montesano, and  R. Preussman.  N-Nitroso Compounds and
     Related Carcinogens.   Chapter 11.   In:  Chemical Carcinogens, ACS Mono-
     graph 173,  ed.  Charles Scale, 1976.

69.  Hartigan, J.M., J.E. Purcell, M.L.  Noyotny, M.L. McConnell, and M.L. Lee.
     Analytical  Performance of a Novel Nitrogen Sensitive Detector and Its
     Applications  with  Glass Open Tubular Columns.  Journal of Chromatography,
     99:339-348, 1974.

70.  Brown, G.B.,  K. Sugiura,  R.M. Cresswell.  Purine N-Oxides. XVI. Oncogenic
     Derivatives of  Xanthine and Guanine.  Cancer  Research, 25:986-991, 1965.

71.  Clayson, D.B.,  R.C. Garner.  Carcinogenic Aromatic Amines and Related
     Compounds.  Chapter 3.   In:  Chemical Carcinogens, ed. Charles Seale, ACS
     Monograph 173,  American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., 1976.

72.  Dunning, W.F.,  M.R. Curtis, and M.E. Maun.  The Effect of Added Dietary
     Tryptophane on  the Occurrence of Diethylstilbestrol-Induced Mammary
     Cancer in Rats.  Cancer Research, 10(5):319-323, 1950.

73.  Dunning, W.F.,  and M.R. Curtis.  The Role of  Indole in Incidence of
     2-Acetylamino Fluorene-Induced  Bladder  Cancer in Rats.  Proc. Soc. Exp.
     Biology, N.Y.,  99(l):91-95, 1958.

74.  Dunning, W.F.,  and M.R. Curtis.  The Relation of Dietary Tryptophan to
     the Induction of Neoplasms in Rats.  Cancer Research, 14:299-302, 1954.

75.  Radomski, J.L., E.M. Glass, W.B. Deichmann.   Transitional Cell Hyperplasia
     in the Bladders of Dogs Fed DL-Tryptophan. Cancer Research, 31:1690-
     1694, 1971.

76.  Miyakawa, M., and  0. Yoshida.   DNA  Synthesis  of the Urinary Bladder Epi-
     thelium in  Rats with Long-Term  Feeding  of DL-Tryptophan-Added and
     Pyridoxine-Deficient Diet.  GANN, Japanese J. Cancer Research, 64(4):
     411-413, 1973.

77.  Verschueren,  K.  Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic Chemicals.
     Van Nostrand  Reinhold  Co., Library  of Congress No. 77-9401, LSBN:0-442-
     29091-8, 1977.

78.  The Merck Index.   Eighth  Edition.   Ed.  P.G. Stecher, Merck and Co., Inc.
     Rahway, NJ, 1968.

79.  Organic Electronic Spectra Data, Vol. V.  Eds. J.P. Philips, R.E. Lyles,
     and P.R. Jones, Wiley  Interscience  Publishers, NY, 1960-1961.

80.  Organic Electronic Spectral Data, Vol.  VI.  Eds. J.P. Philips, L.D.
     Feedman, and  J. Cymerman, Wiley Interscience  Publishers, NY, 1962-1963.


                                     340

-------
81.  Hunter, J.V.   Origin of Organics from Artificial Contamination, p. 71.
     In:  Organic  Compounds in Aquatic Environments, eds. S.L). Faust, and J.V.
     Hunter, Marcel Decker, Inc., NY, 1971.

82.  Jolley, R.L., S. Katz, J.E. Mrochek, W.W. Pitt, and W.T. Rainey.  Analy-
     zing Organics in Dilute Aqueous Solutions.  Chemtech., 312-318, May 1975.

83.  Jolley, R.L.   Determination of Chlorine-Containing Organics in Chlorinated
     Sewage Effluents by Coupled 3^C1 Tracer-High-Resolution Chromatography.
     Environmental Letters, 7(4):321-340, 1974.

84.  Jolley, R.L.   Identification of Organic Halogen Products.  Chesapeake
     Science, 18(1):122-125, 1977.

85.  Hartman, C.H.  Alkali Flame Detector for Organic Nitrogen Compounds.  J.
     Chromatogr. Sci., 7(3):163-167, March 1969.

86.  Fogg, G.E., and D.F. Westlake.  The Importance of Extracellular Products
     of Algae in Freshwater.  Verh. Internat. Verein Limnol., 12:219, 1955.

87.  Ram, N.M.  The Occurrence of Nitrification in Acidic Streams of Southern
     NJ.  Masters  Tehsis, Rutgers University, Dept. of Environmental Science,
     October 1975.

88.  Gardner, W.S., and G.F. Lee.  Gas Chromatographic Procedure to Analyze
     Amino Acids in Lake Waters.  Env. Sci. and Tech., 7(8):719-724, Aug.  1973.

89.  Peake, E., B.L.  Baker, and G.W. Hodgson.  Hydrogeochemistry of the Surface
     Waters of the Mackenzie River Drainage Basin, Canada.  II. The Contribu-
     tion of Amino Acids, Hydrocarbons, and Chlorins to  the Beaufort Sea by  the
     Mackenzie River System.  Geochimica Cosmochimica Acta, 36(8):867-883,
     August, 1972.

90.  Georgiadis, A.G., and J.W. Coffey.  Single Column Analysis of Amino Acids
     in Protein Hydrolysates Utilizing the Fluorescamine Reaction.  Analytical
     Biochemistry, 56:121-128, 1973.

91.  Briggs, M.H.   The Presence of Free Sugars, Peptides and Amino Acids in
     Filtered Lake Waters.  Life Science, 1:377-380, 1962.

92.  Semenov, A.D.  Chemical Nature of Organic Matter in Surface Waters.
     Gidrokhim Mater., 45:155-172, 1967.

93.  Domogalla, B.P., C. Juday, and W.H. Peterson.  The  Forms of Nitrogen
     Found in Certain Lake Waters.  J. Biolog. Chem., 63:269-285, 1925.

94.  Grob, R.L.  Chromatographic Analysis of  the Environment.  Marcel Decker,
     Inc., NY, 1975.

95.  Sidle, A.B.  Amino Acid Content of Atmospheric Precipitation.  Tellus,
     19:128-135, 1967.
                                     341

-------
 96.  Newell, I.L.  Naturally Occurring Organic Substances in Surface Waters
      and Effect of Chlorination.  Journal of the New England Water Work
      Association, 90(4):315-324, 1976.

 97.  Holluta, J., and J. Talsky.  The Chromatographic Determination of Organic
      Materials in Natural Waters.  Vom Wasser, 22:212-242, 1955.

 98.  Holluta, J.  Organic Substances Causing Tastes and Odors in Water, Iso-
      lation and Identification.  Bull. Schweiz. Ver. Gas. und Wasserfachmann,
      40:105-112, 1960.

 99.  Jungclaus, G.A., V. Lopez-Avila, and R. Kites.  Organic Compounds in an
      Industrial Wastewater:  A Case STudy of Their Environmental Impact.
      Environmental Science and Technology, 12:88-96, 1978.

100.  Fogg, G.E., W.D.P. Stewart, P. Fay, and A. Walsby.  The Blue-Green Algae.
      Academic Press, London and New York, 1973.

101.  Fogg, G.E.  Algal Cultures and Phytoplankton Ecology.  The University of
      Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, 1975.

102.  Fogg, G.E.  Extracellular Products of Algae in Freshwater.  Arch. Hydro-
      biol. 5:1, 1971.

103.  Whitton, B.A.  Extracellular Products of Blue Green Algae.  Gen. Micro-
      biol, 39:1, 1965.

104.  Thompson, B.C.  Trihalomethane Formation Potential of Algal Extracellular
      Products and Biomass.  Master of Science Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic
      Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, Environmental Sciences
      and Engineering, March 1978.

105.  Fogg, G.E., C. Nalewajko, and W.D. Watt.  Extracellular Products of
      Phytoplankton Photosynthesis.  Proceedings of  the Royal Society of
      Britain, 162:517, 1965.

106.  Watt, W.D.  Release of Dissolved Organic Material From the Cells of
      Phytoplankton Populations, Proceedings of the  Royal  Society of Britain,
      164:521, 1966.

107.  Berman, T.  Release of Dissolved Organic Matter by Photosynthesizing
      Algae in Lake Kinneret,  Israel.  Freshwater Biology,  6:13, 1976.

108.  Orth, G.M., N.E. Tolbert, and E. Jimenez.  Rate of Glycolate  Formation
      During  Photosynthesis at  High pH.  Plant Physiology,  41:143,  1966.

109.  Fogg, G.E.  Biochemical  Pathways in Unicellular Plants.   In:  Photosyn-
      thesis  and Productivity  in Different Environments.   Cambridge University
      Press,  England,  1975.
110.  Watt, W.D., and  G.E.  Fogg.   The  Kinetics of Extracellular Glycolate Pro-
      duction of Chlorella  Pyrenoidosa,  J. of  Experimental Bot., 17:117, 1966.


                                      342

-------
111.  Aaronson, S.,  B.  DeAngelis,  0. Frank, and H. Baker.   Secretion of Vita-
      mins and Amino Acids in the Environment by Ochromonas danica.   J. of
      Phycology, 7:215, 1971.

112.  McCalla, D.R.   Accumulation of Extracellular Amino Acids by Euglena
      GraoiHs.  J.  of  Protzool.,  10:491-495, 1963.

113.  Rzhanova, G.N.  Extracellular Nitrogen-Containing Compounds of Two
      Nitrogen Fixing Species of Blue-Green Algae.  Mikrobiologiya,  36:639-
      645, 1967.

114.  Fogg, G.E.  The Production of Extracellular Nitrogenous Substances by a
      Blue-Green Algae.  Proc. of the Royal Soceity of Britain, 139:372-397,
      1952.

115.  Leithe, W.  The Analysis of Organic Pollutants in Water and Wastewater.
      Chapter 18.  In:  Urochromes, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor,
      MI, 1973.

116.  Hagihara, F.  III. Paper Microionophoresis of Diazo-Positive Substance.
      J. Pharm. Soc., Japan, 74:490-492, 1954.

117.  Stich, W., and G. Stark.  Chromatographic Analysis of Urochrome B.
      Naturwissenschaften, 40:56-57, 1953.

118.  Fischl, J., and S. Segal.  Identification of the Fluorescent Substances
      Separated by Small Volume Electrophoresis.  Clin. Chim. Acta,  12(3):
      349-352, 1965.

119.  Ichikawa, T.,  M.  Waku, and M. Ishimoto.  Amendment on the Estimation of
      total 17-Hydroxycorticoids in Urine with Semicarbazide Hydrochloride.
      Endocrinol. Japan, 2:87-88,  1955.

120.  Bucksteeg, W., and H. Thiele.  Urochrome in Sewage,  Its Behavior in
      Sewage Purification Systems, Its Presence in Drainage Canals,  and Its
      Significance in Surface-Water Preparation.  Gas und Wasserfach, 98:26-
      32, 1957.

121.  Trzilova, B.,  and A. Vickova.  Urochrome as an Indicator of Fecal Conta-
      mination of Surface Waters.   Cesk. Hyg. (Slovenska Akad. Ved., Bratis-
      lava, Czech.), 10(2):114-122, 1965.

122.  Hettche, H.O.   Urochrome in Water as the Cause of Endemic Goiter.  Gas
      und Wasserfach, 96:660-663,  1955.

123.  Scher, A., P.  Kertai, and T. Bakacs  (Orszagos Kozegeszesegugyi Intezet,
      Budapest, Hungary).  Egeszegtudomany, 6:29-33, 1962.

124.  Klatte, O.J.,  and B. Helpap.  Investigation of the Thyroid-Increase
      Effect in Rats due to Discoloration  (Urochrome and Humic Acids) of Their
      Drinking Water, Univ. of Erlangen-Nurnberg, Germany, 148(8):569-584,
      1964.


                                     343

-------
125.  Wolter, D.  Urochromes as a Problem of Potable Water Hygiene.  (Bezirks
      Hyg. Inst. Schwerin, Schwenn, East Germany).  Fortschr. Wasserchem.
      ihrer Grenzgeb., 7:195-200, 1967.

126.  Hettche, H.O.  Removal of Urochromes from Water.  German Patent, Ger.
      950,837, Oct. 31, 1956.

127.  Hettche, H.O.  Removal of Urochrome from Otherwise Potable Water.  U.S.
      Patent 2,884,378, April  28, 1959.

128.  Knorr, M., W. Graef, and O.J. Klatte.  Color of Drinking Water Containing
      Humic Acids and Urochromes.  Arch. Hyg. Bakteriol., 147(2-3):108-134,
      1963.

129.  Sattlemacher, P.G. and E. Furstenau (Bundesgesundheitsamt, Berlin-Dahlem).
      Determination of Urochrome B in Water in the Presence of Brown Humic
      Acid.  Gesundh.-Ing., 82:16-20, 1961.

130.  Oden, S.  Die Huminsauren.  Chemische, physikalische und bodenkundliche
      Forschungen [mit Unterstutzung der Lars Hierta-Gedachtnisstiftung ausge-
      fuhrt].  Kolloidchemische Beihefte, 11(3-9):75-260, 1 Nov. 1919.

131.  Stuermer, D., and G.R. Harvey.  Humic Substances from Seawater.  Nature,
      London, 250:480-481, 1974.

132.  Junk, G.A. J.J. Richard, M.D. Grieser, D. Witiak, J.L. Witiak, M.D.
      Arguello, R. Vick, H.J.  Svec, J.S. Fritz, and G.V. Calder.  Use of Macro-
      reticular Resins in  the  Analysis of Water for Trace Organic Contaminants.
      Journal of Chromotography, 99:745-762, 1974.

133.  Oulman, C.  Removal  of Trace Organics from Water Using Activated Carbon
      and Polymeric Adsorbents.  Submitted to AWWA Research Foundation, 6666
      West Quincy Ave., Denver, CO, Fifth Quarterly Progress Report, Sanitary
      Eng. Section. Eng. Research Institute, Iowa State University, 1977.

134.  Cheng, K.L.  Separation  of Humic Acid with XAD Resins.  Mikrochimica
      Acta (Wien), 11:389-396, 1977.

135.  Blunk, D.  Isolation of  Dissolved Organic Matter from Natural Waters.
      In: 33rd Northwest Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society, Program
      Abstracts, Seattle Pacific Unib., Seattle, WA, June 14-16, 1978.

136.  Weber, J.H., and S.A. Wilson.  The Isolation and Characterization of
      Fulvic Acid and Humic Acid from River Water.  Water Research 9:1079-
      1084, 1975.

137.  Shinohara, R., M. Koga,  J. Shinohara, and T. Hori.  Extraction of Trace
      Organics from Water  with Amberlite XAD-2 Resin.  Bunseki Kagaku, 26(12):
      856-861, 1977.
                                     344

-------
138.  Junk,  G.A.  J.J.  Richard,  H.J.  Svec,  and J.S.  Fritz.   Simplified Resin
      Sorption for Measuring Selected Contaminants.  J. of the Amer. Water
      Works  Association,  68:218-222, April 1976.

139.  Wun, C.K.,  R.W.  Walker, and W. Litsky.  The Use of XAD-2 Resin for the
      Analysis of Coprostanol in Water.  Water Research 10:955-959, 1976.

140.  Burnham, A.K., G.V. Calder, J.S. Fritz, G.A.  Junk, H.J. Svec, and R. Vick.
      Trace  Organics in Water;  Their Isolation and Identification.  J. of the
      American Water Works Association, 65:722-725, 1973.

141.  Webb,  R.G.   Isolating Organic Water Pollutants:  XAD Resins, Urethane
      Foams, Solvent Extraction.  US Environmental Protection Agency, Environ-
      mental Monitoring Series, EPA-660/4-75-003, 1975.

142.  Junk.  G.A., J.J. Richard, J.S. Fritz, and H.J. Svec.  Resin Sorption
      Methods for Monitoring Selected Contaminants in Water.  Chapter 9.  In:
      Identification and Analysis of Organic Pollutants in Water, ed. L.H.
      Keith, Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Inc., Ann Arbor, MI, 1976.

143.  Junk,  G.A.  C.D.  Chriswell, R,C. Chang, L.D. Kissinger, J.J. Richard,
      J.S. Fritz, and H.J. Svec.  Applications of Resins for Extracting Organic
      Components for Water.  Z. Anal. Chem. 282:331-337, 1976.

144.  Van Rossum, P.,  and R.G.  Webb.  Isolation of Organic Water Pollutants by
      XAD Resins and Carbon.  J. of Chromatographic Science, 150:381-392, 1978.

145.  Burnham, A.K., G.V. Calder, J.S. Fritz, G.A. Junk, H.J. Svec, and R.
      Willis.  Identification and Estimation of Neutral Organic Contaminants
      in Potable Water.  Anal.  Chemistry, 44(1):139-142, 1972.

146.  Webb,  R.G.   Resin Accumulators for Trace Organics.  Quarterly Research
      Highlights, Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Lab.,
      Athens, GA, p. 2, April-June 1977.

147.  Chu, C.H.,  and Pietrzyk.   High Pressure Chromatography on XAD-2, a Porous
      Polystyrene-divinylbenzene Support—Separation of Organic Bases.  Anal.
      Chemistry,  46(3):330-336, 1974.

148.  Ambersorb Carbonaceous Adsorbents.  Rohm and Haas Co., Philadelphia, PA,
      August 1977.

149.  Sproul, O.J. and D.W. Ryckman.  The Significance of Trace Organics  in
      Water Pollution. . J. Water Pollution Contr. Fed. 33(11):1188-1198,  1961.

150.  Tenax.GC.  Technical Bulletin No. 24, Applied Science Laboratories, Inc.
      P.O. Box 440, State College, PA.

151.  Butler, L.D., and M.F. Burke.  Chromatographic Characterization of  Porous
      Polymers for Use as Adsorbents in Sampling Columns.  J. of  Chromato-
      graphic Science, 14:117-122, 1976.
                                     345

-------
152.  Novotny, M.,  M.L.  Lee,  and K.D.  Bartle.   Some  Analytical Aspects of the
      Chromatographic  Headspace Concentration  Method Using a Porous Polymer.
      Chromatographia,  7(7):333-338,  July 1974.

153.  Katz, S., W.W. Pitt,  and C.D.  Scott.   The Determination of Stable Organic
      Compounds in  Waste Effluents at  Microgram per  Liter Levels by Automatic
      High-Resolution  Ion Exchange Chromatography.   Water Research, 6:1029-
      1037, 1972.

154.  Brown, P.R.   High  Pressure Liquid  Chromatography:  Biochemical and Bio-
      medical Applications.   Academic  Press, New York  and London, Library of
      Congress Catalog Card No. 72-77361, 1973.

155.  Scott, C.D.,  D.D.  Chilcote,  and  N.E.  Lee.  Coupled Anion and Cation Ex-
      change Chromatography of Complex Biochemical Mixtures.  Analytical
      Chemistry,  44(l):85-89,  1972.

156.  Terweij-Groer, C.F., and J.C.  Kraok.   Ion-Pair Phase Systems for the
      Separation  of Carboxylic Acids,  Sulphonic  Acids  and Phenols by High
      Pressure Liquid  Chromatography.  J. of Chromatography, 138:245-266, 1977.

157.  Paired-Ion  Chromatography:   An Alternative to  Ion Exchange.  Water
      Associates, Inc.,  Maple  St., Milford, MA,  May  1976.

158.  Frei, R.W., and  L.F. Lawrence.   Fluorigenic Labelling in High Speed
      Liquid Chromatography.   J.  of  Chromatography,  83:321-330, 1973.

159.  Katz, S., and W.W.  Pitt.   A New  Versatile  and  Sensitive Monitoring System
      for Liquid  Chromatography.   Cerate Oxidation and Fluorescence Measure-
      ments.  Analytical Letters,  5(3):177-185,  1972.

160.  L.C. Column Report.  Methods Development Guide.  DuPont Company, Concord
      Plaza, Wilmington,  DE.

161.  Kirkland, J.J.  High Speed  Separations of  Nucelotides and Nucleic Acid
      Based by Column  Chromatography,  Using Controlled Surface Porosity Ion
      Exchanges.  Journal of  Chromatographic Science,  8(2):72-75, Feb. 1970.

162.  Vematsu, T.,  and R. Suhaddnik.   Separation of  Nucelic Acid Hydrolysis
      Products, Purines,  Pyrimidines,  Nucelosides, Nucleotides, Ribonucleic
      Acid Hydrolyzates,  and Mixtures  from Nucelotide  Synthesis by Column
      Chromatography on  Amberlite  XAD-4.  J. of  Chromatography, 123:347-354,
      1976.

163.  Schneider, H.G., and Glazko, A.J.   High  Performance Liquid Chromatography
      of Adenine and Hypoxanthine  Arabinosides.  J.  of Chromatography, 139:
      370-375, 1977.

164.  Hoffman, N.E., and  J.C.  Liao.  Reversed  Phase  High Performance Liquid
      Chromatographic Separations  of Nucelotides in  the Presence of Solvo-
      phobic Ions.  Analytical  Chemistry, 49:2231-2234, 1977.
                                     346

-------
 165.   Strop, P., I. Basnak, and J. Farkas.  Separation of Alkyl Derivatives  of
       Uracil by Solvophobic Adsorption Chromatography on Spheron.  Journal of
       Chromatography, 138:47-62, 1977.

 166.   Hartwick, R.A. and P.R. Brown.  Evaluation of Microparticle Chemically
       Bonded Reversed Phase Packings in  the High Pressure Liquid Chromato-
       graphic Analysis of Nucleosides and Their Bases.  Journal of Chromato-
       graphy, 126:679-691, 1976.

 167.   Anderson, F.S., and R.C. Murphy.   Isocratic Separation of Some Purine
       Nucelotide, Nucleoside, and Base Metabolites from Biological Extracts  by
       High Performance Liquid Chromatography.  Journal of Chromatography, 121:
       251-262, 1976.

 168.   Hartwick, R.A., and P.R. Brown.  Selective Analysis for Adenosine Using
       Reversed-Phase High Pressure Liquid Chromatography.  Journal of Chroma-
       tography, 143:383-389, 1977.

 169.   Hadzija, D., and D. Keglevic.  Simple Method for the Separation of Amino
       Acids, Amino Sugars and Amino Alcohols Related to the Peptidoglycan
       Components on a Standard Amino Acid Analyzer.  Journal of Chromatography,
       138:458-460, 1977.

 170.   Stein, S., P. Bohlen, J. Stone, W. Dairman, and S. Udenfriend.  Amino
       Acid Analysis with Fluorescamine at the Picomole Level.  Archiv. Biochem.
       Biophys., 155:203-213, 1973.

 171.   Roth, M., and A. Hampai.  Column Chromatography of Amino Acids with
       Fluorescamine Detection.  J. of Chromatography, 83:353-356, 1973.

 172.   Bayer, E., E. Groin, B. Kaltenegger, and R. Uhmann.  Separation of Amino
       Acids by High Performance Liquid Chromatography.  Anal. Chemistry, 48:
       1106-1109, 1976.

 173.   Ellis, J.P., and J.B. Garcia.  Multi-sample Quantification of Amino
       Acids and Imino Acids with a Single Analytical System.  J. of Chromato-
       graphy,  59:321-327, 1971.

 174.   Ellis, J.P., and J.B. Garcia.  An Accelerated Operation of a Three Sample
       Amino Acid Analyzer.  J. of Chromatography, 87:419-424, 1973.

 175.   Johnson, E., A.  Abu-Shumays, and S.R. Abbott.  Use of Fluorescence
       Detection in High Performance Liquid Chromatography.  J. of Chromato-
       graphy,  132:107-119, 1977.

 176.  Grushka, E., and R.P.W.  Scott.   Polypeptides as a Permanently Bound
      Stationary Phase in Liquid Chromatography.  Anal. Chemistry, 45(9):
       1626-1632.

177.  Mrochek, J.E.,  W.C. Butts, W.T. Rainey, and C.A. Burtis.  Separation and
       Identification of Urinary Constituents by Use of Multiple Analytical
      Techniques.   Clinical Chemistry,  17(2):72-77, 1971.


                                     347

-------
178.  Geeraerts, F., L. Schimpfessel, and R. Crokaert.  Separation of Urinary
      Ultraviolet Absorbing Metabolites by High Pressure Liquid Chromatography
      Using a Commercially Availabe Analytical Unit.  J. of Chromatography,
      145:63-71, 1978.

179.  Hamilton, P.B.  The Ion Exchange Chromatography of Urine Amino Acids:
      Resolution of the Ninhydrin Positive Constituents by Different Chromato-
      graphic Procedures.  In:  CRC Handbook of Biochemistry, Selected Data
      for Molecular Biology, ed. H.A. Sorber, 1968.

180.  Katz, S., W.W. Pitt, and J.E. Mrochek.  Comparative Serum and Urine
      Analyses by Dual Detector Anion Exchange Chromatography.  J. of Chroma-
      tography, 104:303-310, 1975.

181.  Burtis, C.A.  The Separation of the Ultraviolet-Absorbing Constituents
      of Urine by High-Pressure Liquid Chromatography.  J. of Chromatography,
      52:97-106, 1970.

182.  Molnar, I., and C. Horvath.  Rapid Separation of Urinary Acids, by High
      Pressure Liquid Chromatography.  J. of Chromatography, 143:391-400, 1977.

183,  Scott, C.D.  Analysis of Urine for Its Ultraviolet Absorbing Constituents
      by High Pressure Anion Exchange Chromatography.  Clinical Chemistry,
      14(8):521-528, 1968.

184.  Chromatographic Methods 820M5.  DuPont Instrument Products Division,
      Wilmington, DE.

185.  Talley, C.P.  High-Speed Ion Exchange Chromatography of Several Mono
      Substituted Puridine Isomers.  Anal. Chemistry, 43(11):1512-1514, 1971.

186.  McMurtrey, K.D., L.R. Meyerson, J.L. Cashaw, and V.E. Davis.  High
      Pressure Cation Exchange Chromatography of Biogenic Amines.  Anal. Bio-
      Chemistry, 72:566-572, 1976.

187.  Dong, M., and D.C. Locke.  Separation of Aza Arenses by High Pressure
      Liquid Chromatography.  J. of Chromatographic Science, 15:32-35, 1977.

188.  Mefford, I., R.W. Keller, and Adams, R.N.  Liquid Chromatographic Deter-
      mination of Picomole Quantities of Aromatic Amine Carcinogens.  Anal.
      Chemistry, 49:683, 1977.

189,  Madison, B.L., W.J. Kozarek, and C.P. Damo.  High Pressure Liquid Chroma-
      tography of Caffeine in Coffee.  J. of the AOAC, 59(6):1258-1261, 1976.

190.  DuPont Liquid Chromatographs.  Product Bulletin:  Zipax Chromatographic
      Support and Zipax precoated Column Packings.  DuPont Co., Wilmingtin, DE.

191.  Mague, T.H., and F.C. Mague.  A Simplified Procedure for Determination
      of Particulate Organic Nitrogen,  Submitted to Limnology and Oceano-
      graphy, June 1974.
                                     348

-------
192.  Slavin, W., A.T. Rhys Williams, and R.F. Adams.  A fluorescence Detector
      for High Pressure Liquid Chromatography.  Journal of Chromatography,
      134:121-130, 1977.

193.  Gomez, M.M., D. Kvehl, and P.R. Griffiths.  Application of Fourier
      Transform  Inlnfrared Spectroscopy to the Identification of Trace Organics
      in Water.   International Journal of Environmental Anal. Chem., 5:103-
      117, 1978.

194.  White, C.E., and R.J. Argauer.  Fluorescence Analysis, a Practical
      Approach,  ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY, Library of Congress
      Catalog Card Number 70-127029, 1970.

195.  DiCesare,  J.L.  Utilization of Fluorescence Detection Coupled to Liquid
      Chromatography.  Trends in Fluorescence (Perkin-Elmer Corp., Norwalk,
      CT), l(l):2-5, 1978.

196.  Schulman,  S .G.  Fluorescence and Phosphorescence Spectroscopy:  Physio-
      chemical Principles and Practice.  Pergamon Press, ISBN 008-020499-6,
      1977.

197.  Becker, R.S.  Theory and Interpretation of Fluorescence and Phosphores-
      cence.  Wiley Interscience, Library of Congress Catalog Number: 79-76049,
      ISBN 471-01126-3, 1969.

198.  DeMent, J.  Fluorochemistry.  Chemical Publishing Co., Inc., Brooklyn,
      NY, 1945.

199.  Konev, S.V.  Fluorescence and Phosphorescence of Proteins and Nucleic
      Acids, ed. Sidney Udenfriend (Translation), Plenum Press, NY, 1967.

200.  Sylvia, A.E., D.A. Bancroft, and J.D. Miller.  Detection and Measurement
      of Microorganics in Drinking Water by Fluorescence.  In:  Proceedings of
      the American Water Works Association,  (Lawrence Experiment Station,
      Lawrence, MA), Water Quality Conference, Dallas, TX, Dec. 1974.

201.  Weigele,  M., S.L. DeBernardor, J.P.  Tengi, and W. Leimgruber.  A Novel
      Reagent for the Fluorometric Assay of Primary Amines.  Journal of the
      American Chemical Society,  94(16):5927-5928, 1972.

202.  Udenfriend, S., S. Stein, P. Bohlen, and W. Dairman.  Fluorescamine:  A
      Reagent for Assay of Amino  Acids, Peptides, and Primary Amines in the
      Picomole Range.  Science, 178:871-872,  1972.

203.  Mendez, E., and J.G. Gavilanes.   Fluorometric Detection of Peptides after
      Column Chromatography or on Paper:  o-phthalaldehyde and Fluorescamine.
      Analytical Biochemistry,  72:473-479, 1976.

204.  North,  B.B.  Primary Amines in California Coastal Waters:  Utilization by
      Phytoplankton.   Limnology and Oceanography, 20(l):20-27, Jan. 1975.
                                     349

-------
205.  Felix, A.M., and Terkelson.  Determination of Hydroxyproline in Fluoro-
      metric Amine Acid Analysis with Fluorescamine.  Analytical Biochemistry,
      56:610-615, 1973.

206.  Krol, G.J., C.A. Mannan,  R.E. Pickering, D.V. Amato, and B.T. Kho.
      Short Excitation Wavelength Fluorometric Determination in High Pressure
      Liquid Chromatography of  Indole Pepetide, Napthyl, and Phenol Compounds.
      Analytical Chemistry, 49(12):1836-1839, 1977.

207.  Weigele, M., S. DeBernardo, and W. Leimgruber.  Fluorometric Assay of
      Secondary Amino Acids.  Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communica-
      tion, 50(2):352-356, 1973.

208.  Berthelot, M.P.E.   (Correspondence)   Sujet:   Reaction dy Phenol avec le
      Chlorine de Chaux.   Repertoire de  Chimie Appliquee 284, Tome 1:284,1859,

209.  Solorzano, L.  Determination of Ammonia in Natural Waters by the Phenyl-
      hypochlorite Method.  Limnology and Oceanography, 14:799-801, 1969.

210.  Wearne, J.T.   Nonspecificity of Hypochlorite-Phenol Estimation of Ammonium
      in  Biological  Materials.   Analytical  Chemistry, 35(3):327-329, 1963.

211.  Mann, L.T.  Spectrophotometric Determination of Nitrogen  in  Total Micro-
      Kjeldahl Digests.   Analytical  Chemistry,  35(13):2179-2182, 1963.

212.  Lubonchinsky,  B.,  and  J.P.  Zalta.   Colorimetric Microdetermination of
      Total Nitrogen.   Bull.  Soc.  Chim.  Biol.,  36:1363-1366,  1954.

213.  Strickland, J.D.H., and T.H.  Parsons.  A Practical  Handbook  of  Seawater
      Analysis.   Fisheries Research Board of Canada,  Ottawa,  1972.

214.  Scheiner,  D.   Determination of Kjeldahl Nitrogen  by Indephenol  Method.
      Water  Research,  10:31-36, 1976.

215.  Weatherburn,  M.W.   Phenol-Hypochlorite Reaction for Determination of
      Ammonia.   Analytical Chemistry,  39(8):971-974,  1967.

216.  Harwood,  J.E., and D.J. Huyser.   Some Aspects of  the Phenol-Hypochlorite
      Reaction as Applied to Ammonia Analysis.   Water Research, 4:501-515, 1970.

217.  Rossum,  J.R.,  and P.A.  Villarruz.   Determination of Ammonia by the Indo-
      phenol Method.  Journal of American Water Works Association, 55(1):657.

218.  Bolleter,  W.T.,  C.J. Bushman, and P.W. Tidwell.  Spectrophotometric De-
       termination of Ammonia as Indophenol.  Anal. Chemistry, 33:592-594,  1961.

219.   Cocking, A.W.   Use of  Indophenol Method for Estimation of Ammonia Exreted
       by Freshwater Fish.  Journal Fish. Res. Bd., Canada, 24:1419, 1967.

220.  Manabe, T.  New Modifications of Lubochinsky's Indophenol Method for
       Direct Microanalysis of  Ammonia-N in Sea Water.  Japanese Soc. Sci.
       Fish.  Bull.,  35:897, 1969.

                                      350

-------
221.  Koroleff,  F.   Direct Determination of Ammonia in Natural Waters As Indo-
      phenol Blue.   Intern. Council for the Exploration of the Sea, C(9):19,
      1969.

222.  Harwood, J.E., and D.J.  Huyser.   Automated Analysis of Ammonia in Water.
      Water Research, 4:695, 1970.

223.  Head,  P.D.  An Automated Phenolhypochlorite Method for the Determination
      of Ammonia in Sea Water.  Deep Sea Research, 18:531, 1971.

224.  Croll, B.T.  Organic Pollutants in Water.  Water Treatment Examination,
      21:213, 1972.

225.  Hsu, K., and B. Currie.   High Performance Liquid Chromatography of Dansyl-
      Amino Acids and Application to Peptide Hydrolysates.  Journal of Chroma-
      tography,  166(2):555-562, 1978.

226.  Thurston,  A.D.  High Pressure Liquid Chromatography Techniques for the
      Isolation and Identification of Organics in Drinking Water Extracts.
      Journal of Chromatographic Science, 16:254-259, 1978.

227.  Riley, C.M.,  E. Tomlinson, T.M.  Jefferies, and P.H. Redfern.  Surfactant
      Ion-Pair High-Performance Liquid Chromatography of Tryptophan and Some
      of Its Metabolites in Biological Fluids.  Journal of Chromatography,
      162:153-161,  1979.

228.  Clark, C.R.,  and M.M. Wells.   Precolumn Derivatization of Amines for
      Enhanced Detectability in Liquid Chromatography.  Journal of Chromato-
      graphic Science, 16:332-339,  1978.

229.  Wilkinson, J.M.  The Separation of Dansyl Amino Acids by Reversed Phase
      High Performance Liquid Chromatography.  Journal of Chromatographic
      Science, 16:547-552, 1978.

230.  Ohtsuki, K.,  and H. Hatano.  Ion-Exchange Chromatography of Amino Acids
      and Aromatic Amino Acid Derivatives by Single Column Method.  Journal
      of Chromatography, 148:536-538,  1978.

231.  Kasiske, D.,  K.D. Klinkmuller, and M. Sonneborn.  Application of High
      Performance Liquid Chromatography to Water Pollution Analysis.  Journal
      of Chromatography, 149:703-710,  1978.

232.  McKeag, M., and P.R. Brown.  Modification of High-Pressure Liquid Chroma-
      tographic Nucleotide Analysis.  Journal of Chromatography, 152:253-254,
      1978.

233.  Oliver, B.C.   Chlorinated Nonvolatile Organics Produced by the Reaction
      of Chlorine with Humic Materials.  Canadian Research, ll(6):21-22,
      1978,
                                      351

-------
234.  Christman, R.F., J.D. Johnson, J.R. Hass, F.K. Pfaender, W.T. Liao, B.C.
      Norwood, and H.J. Alexander.  Natural and Model Aquatic Humics:
      Reactions with Chlorine.  In:  Water Chlorination, Environmental Impact
      and Health Effects, Vol.  2, eds.  R.L. Jolley, H. Gorchev, and D.H.
      Hamilton, Ann Arbor Science, 1978, pp. 15-28.

235.  Morris, J.C., and B. Baum.  Precursors and Mechanisms of Haloform
      Formation in the Chlorination of Water Supplies.  In:  Water Chlori-
      nation, Environmental Impact and Health Effects, Vol. 2, eds. R.L.
      Jolley, H. Gorchev, and D.H. Hamilton, Ann Arbor Science, 1978, pp. 28-
      48.
                                      352

-------
                                  TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                           (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1 REPORT NO
   EPA-600/2-80-031
                                                          3 RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4 TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  FORMATION AND  SIGNIFICANCE OF N-CHLORO COMPOUNDS IN
  WATER SUPPLIES
               5 REPORT DATE
                 July 1980 (Issuing Date)
               6 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7 AUTHOR(S)
  Carrell Morris, Neil  Ram,  Barbara Baum, Edmund Wajon
                                                          8 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO
9 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  Harvard University
  Division  of Applied  Sciences
  Cambridge, Mass.  02138
               10 PROGRAM ELEMENT NO
               1CC614    SOS# 2    Task  5
               11 CONTRACT7GRANT NOT

                 R803631
12 SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
 Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory - Cin.,OH
 Office of Research  and  Development
 U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency
 Cincinnati, Ohio  45268
               13 TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
               Final Rpt. April 1,1975-June  30
               14 SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                         EPA/600/14
15 SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES

      Project Officer:  Edward L. Katz, (513) 684-7235
16 ABSTRACT
     Many naturally  occurring nitrogenous organic compounds  readily  react with aqueous
chlorine, exerting significant chlorine demands. Several N-organic compounds also
produce chloroform upon  reaction with chlorine with maximum  formation occurring between
pH 8.5 and pH  10.5.   The correlation between chloroform formation and chlorine demand,
however,  is  tenuous.   It also appears that intermediates may be  formed under neutral or
slightly  acidic  conditions  which produce chloroform upon exposure to more alkaline
conditions.
     Available analytical methods used to differentiate between  free and combined chlo-
rine are  subject  to  interference from organic chloramines.   Some differentiation, how-
ever, may be achieved using amperometric titration.
     Seven N-organic compounds were identified in municipal  water  supplies     (adenine,
5-chlorouracil,  cytosine, guanine, purine, thymine, and uracil)  at concentrations rangi
from 20ug/L  to 860ug/L.   A  large unidentified group of primary amine compounds was ob-
served in all  of  the samples.  Field and laboratory data suggested that summer algal
bloom occurrences add considerably to the organic nitrogen content of a water supply.
     Calculated  levels of CHCl^ which might have formed in the water supplies under
alkaline  conditions  were more than 10% of EPA's  maximum contaminant level for trihalo-
methanes.  Calculated levels of combined forms of chlorine yielding  falsely positive
tests for free chlorine  in  some samples were significant.
17
                               KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                             b IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                             C  COSATI I Icld/Grtiup
 chlorination,  nitrogen organic
 compounds,  organic compounds, chloroform
   high performance liquid
   chromatography, Northeast
   Mass.,  fluorescence
   spectroscopy, nitrogenous
   haloforms
                                                                          13B
18 DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

     RELEASE TO  PUBLIC
  19 SECURITY CLASS (Tint Report)
     Unclassified
21 NO OF PAGES
      361
  20 SECURITY CLASS (This page}
     Unclassified
                             22 PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev 4-77)
353

-------