SEPA
           United States
           Environmental Protection
           Agency
           Environmental Research
           Laboratory
           Corvallis OR 97330
LPA GOO 8-79-017a
June 1979
           Research and Development
The Effects of
Decreased Nutrient
Loading on the
Limnology of
Diamond  Lake,
Oregon

-------
                 RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

 Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
 Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
 gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
 vironmental technology.  Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously
 planned to foster tecnnology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
 The nine series are:

       1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
       2.  Environmental Protection Technology
       3.  Ecological Research
       4.  Environmental Monitoring
       5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
       6.  Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
       7.  Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
       8.  "Special" Reports
      9.  Miscellaneous Reports

 This report has been assigned to the "SPECIAL" REPORTS series. This series is
 reserved for reports targeted to meet the technical information needs of specific
 user groups. The series includes problem-oriented reports, research application
 reports, and executive summary documents. Examples include state-of-the-art
 analyses, technology assessments,  design manuals, user manuals, and reports
 on the results of major research and development efforts.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

-------
                                          EPA-600/8-79-017a
                                          June 1979
THE EFFECTS OF DECREASED NUTRIENT LOADING ON
    THE LIMNOLOGY OF DIAMOND LAKE, OREGON
                     by
                 W. L. Lauer
               G. S. Schuytema
               W. D. Sanville
                 F. S. Stay
                C. F. Powers
 Corvallis Environmental Research Laboratory
            Corvallis, OR  97330
 CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
     OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
    U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
            CORVALLIS, OR  97330

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

     This  report has  been reviewed by  the Corvallis  Environmental  Research
Laboratory,  U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency,  and approved  for publica-
tion.   Mention  of  trade  names  or  commercial  products  does  not  constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                     ii

-------
                                   FOREWORD

     Effective regulatory and enforcement actions by the Environmental  Protec-
tion Agency  would be virtually  impossible without  sound scientific data  on
pollutants  and  their  impact  on  environmental  stability  and human  health.
Responsibility for building  this  data base has  been assigned  to  EPA's  Office
of Research and Development and its 15 major field installations,  one of which
is the  Corvallis  Environmental Research Laboratory (CERL).

     The primary  mission of  the  Corvallis Laboratory  is research  on the  ef-
fects  of  environmental  pollutants  on  terrestrial,  freshwater,   and  marine
ecosystems; the behavior, effects and control  of pollutants  in lake and  stream
systems; and  the development  of  predictive models on the  movement of  pollu-
tants in the biosphere.

     This  report documents  the  effects of diversion  of domestic  wastewater
from a  freshwater lake.
                                       James C.  McCarty
                                       Acting Director, CERL
                                      iii

-------
                                   ABSTRACT

     Responding to  accelerated  recreational  pressure  at Diamond Lake,  Oregon,
in 1969  the U.S.  Forest Service began installation of  a wastewater diversion
system which  would  eventually carry 85 to 90% of the  sewage out of the water-
shed.  From 1971  through  1977  the U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency  con-
ducted a program  of research on the lake  to determine  its trophic status and
identify changes that might be the result of the diversion.

     The  lake is quite productive as the result of natural loading from tribu-
taries,   groundwater  and  bottom  sediments.  Cultural  influence,  initially
speculated  to be significant, was discovered to have a relatively minor impact
on the lake.  Total phosphorus and chlorophyll a levels reached a low in 1973,
but  by 1977 had increased to levels comparable  to 1971.  Species composition
of the benthic  macroinvertebrate population was the same in 1976/77 as it was
at the beginning of  the study.

     Recommendations include  an adaptation of the Dillon and Rigler system for
determining the development capacity of lakes.

     The report covers a period from June 4, 1971  to October 27,  1977.
                                      1v

-------
                                   CONTENTS
                                                                          Page


Foreword	  ^ 1

Abstract	   iv

Figures	   V1

Tables	vii

Acknowledgment 	 V111

Introduction 	   1

     Historical Background 	   1

Conclusions	   6

Recommendations  	   7

Study Design and Procedures  	   8

Diamond Lake Characteristics 	  12

     Study Site	  12

     Hydrology	  12

     Nutrient Budget  	  14

     Physical and Chemical Properties   	  22

     Primary Producers  	  24

     Benthic Macroinvertebrates   	  36

Management Applications  	   45

References	   56

-------
                                    FIGURES
Number                                                                  £§S§

   1.     Map of Topography and development around Diamond Lake ....   2

   2.     Bathymetric map with lake sampling sites, tributaries
          and wells ..........................   9
   3.     Average monthly hydrological budget (1972-1977)  .......   13

   4.     Total phosphorus volume weighted means   ...........   23

   5.     Total inorganic nitrogen volume weighted means   .......   25

   6.     Secchi disc measurements  ..................   27

   7.     Total phytoplankton volume weighted means ..........   30

   8.     Chlorophyll a volume weighted means .............   34

   9.     Primary productivity volume weighted means  .........   35

  10.     Mean number benthic macroinvertebrates per square
          meter ............................   37

  11.     Dendrogram showing dissimilarity of benthic macro-
          invertebrate populations  ..................   44
                                     vi

-------
                                    TABLES
Number                                                                  Page

   1.      Chronology of wastewater diversion and visitor use  	    4

   2.      Total  phosphorus and total inorganic nitrogen
          contributions from Natural Sources  	   15

   3.      Total  phosphorus, total  inorganic nitrogen and
          total  dissolved phosphorus in wellwater 	   17

   4.      Analysis of snow samples from ground	   16

   5,      Phosphorus input minus output (1972-77) 	   18

   6.      Phosphorus contribution  by sediments  	   19

   7.      Fishery contribution to  phosphorus budget 	   21

   8.      Total  phosphorus and total inorganic nitrogen
          in wastewater	22

   9.      Total  phosphorus and total inorganic nitrogen
          volume weighted means at center station 	   26

  10.      Dissolved oxygen at center station, 13 m	28

  11.      Dominant phytoplankton volume weighted means  	   31

  12.      Benthic macroinvertebrates  	   38

  13.      Major macroinvertebrate groups and
          percent composition , 1971-1977 	   40

  14.      Area!  species richness,  Shannon-Weaver diversity
          and complement of Simpson's index of benthic
          macroinvertebrate populations 	   42

  15.      The Dillon and Rigler system for estimating
          acceptable P load and capacity for development	46

  16.      The critical load calculation according to Vollenweider ...   50

  17.      Rating of factors affecting present and
          potential trophic status  	   51

  18.      Determining acceptable P  load with a
          minimum of field data	53

                                     vii

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     The following persons were instrumental  in the experimental design, field
and laboratory work:  Karl  R.  Rukavina,  Alan V. Munhall,  Julie A. Searcy and
Spencer A.  Peterson.

     Judy 8. Carkin,  Richard  C.  Swartz and James  Keniston assisted with sta-
tistical analysis and  data collation.

     From  the  U.S.  Forest  Service,  Robert Sawyer and Dallas  Hughes were ex-
tremely helpful  in supplying information and assisting with  field work.

     Jerry Bauer  of the  Oregon Department of  Fish and Wildlife provided data
generated from their studies at Diamond Lake.
                                     vm

-------
                                 INTRODUCTION

     Many mountain lakes in Oregon and Washington are subject to heavy recrea-
tional  use during the  non-winter months.   Intensive use frequently results in
greatly increased  nutrient flux  to  lakes with  a consequent acceleration  of
eutrophication rates  and  degradation of water quality.  This study  documents
the impact of a waste-water interception program  at Diamond Lake, Oregon,  with
emphasis on defining  the  nutrient budget and describing the  benthic macroin-
vertebrate population.  Recommendations  are  made which could provide  a  basis
for scientific lake management.

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

     Diamond  Lake  lies at  an elevation  of  1580 m  in the  Cascade  Mountains
approximately 24 km north  of Crater Lake, Oregon.  The lake resulted from the
melting of  an extensive  glacier held behind  a   lava  flow  from Mt.  Thielson,
perhaps 10,000 years ago (Purdom, 1964).

     Development around Diamond  Lake began in the 1920's.   The  first building
permit was  issued in  1922 for  a  lodge at  the  northeast   corner  of the  lake
(Cleator,  1924).   A  private resort  complex now encompasses  15  ha  of  land
including approximately 250 m  of shoreline.  Guest capacity is 384 persons.
Another service  facility  occupying  approximately 0.6 ha  is  located near the
southeast corner of the lake.  A trailer park, also near the southeast corner,
can accomodate 115 trailers on 6.5 ha (U.S.  Forest  Service [USFS], 1970).

     At  one  time a  YMCA   camp  occupied approximately  4  ha at  the  southwest
corner of the  lake.   It consisted of a  lodge  and 14 cabins, but has not been
used  since  1971  (USFS,  1970).   The first  private recreation  residence was
approved in 1923.  Presently there are 102 such dwellings occupying 19 ha of a
designated 75  ha plot  on the west  side of the  lake  (USFS,  1970).   A buffer
strip of vegetation,  including  tall  conifers, was  left  between the  dwellings
and the lake to maintain the integrity of the  shoreline.

     About  1948  four  cabins were  built  next  to  the outlet  to  accommodate
personnel from  the Diamond  Lake  fishegg-taking  station.   These buildings are
now used occasionally  by the Oregon Department of  Fish and Wildlife (DFW).

     The USFS,  which  primary  has responsibility  for  land management of the
Diamond Lake area, maintains three campground complexes totaling approximately
88  ha.   The  largest  of  these,  East  Shore  Campground, occupies  40 ha  in a
narrow strip on the east shoreline.  It has  190 trailer/ tent and 50 tent only
sites.   Two  picnic  areas,  comprising  more  than  6 ha,  are also part of the
development  (USFS,  1970).   All   development immediately  around the  lake is
shown in Figure 1.

-------
        Scale
                   1HTP
Figure 1.  Topography  and  development around Diamond  Lake  (elevations in feet),

-------
     Recreational use  of Diamond  Lake  has increased  rapidly:   it  has  become
one of  the most  popular areas  in  Oregon.   In 1923 slightly  more  than 9,000
people were  estimated  to  have visited the  lake  (Cleator,  1924).   The camp-
grounds  show a  visitor-day  (12 hr)  increase  from less  than 30,000 to  over
104,000 from  1956 to  1963 (Oregon State Game  Comm. ,  1963).   By  1965 the USFS
reported use of all  developed areas at over 307,000 visitor days  (Robertshaw &
Thorpe,  1965)  and by  1977 the  figure  had more  than  doubled to  670,000 (R.
Sawyer,  District Engineering  Asst.,  Diamond  Lake Ranger  Dist.,  USFS,  pers
comm.).  Heaviest  use  occurs   in  the  summer  during  the  fishing  season but
snow-oriented recreation is increasing.

     The USFS  has maximized  the recreation value  of the Diamond  Lake area.
Around 1913  they stocked the lake with trout  (Bauer,  1976).   Grazing sheep in
the meadows  was  discontinued in the  1920's.   Timber harvesting  is  limited to
only the salvage  and removal necessary to promote recreation (USFS, 1970).

     The DFW (formerly the Oregon State Game Commission) began intensive study
and management  of the fishery  in  1946  in  response to an  apparent  decline in
the size  and number  of rainbow trout,  Salmo  gairdneri  (Locke,  1947).  Spot
poisoning  of the roach, Siphateles bicolor bicolor,  apparently  introduced in
the early  1930's (Bauer,  1976), was initiated in  1946  to  reduce competition
with trout.   In  September  1954 the roach was  completely  eradicated by  inten-
sive rotenone application.   The lake was  restocked in June 1955 with Canadian
rainbow  trout  (Oregon State  Game  Comm. 1954, 1955).   Data  regarding fishing
pressure and success, fish growth and fish food production are gathered by the
DFW to direct management  policies.

     A mosquito  control program was initiated in  the early 1960's.   DDT was
used  initially  but  discontinued when mayfly  nymph  numbers  dropped, substan-
tially reducing  an  important fish food (J. Bauer, District Fishery Biologist,
DFW,  pers.  comm.).   Benzene  hexachloride  was  applied  in  1968 and 1969.  The
present program  involves one application of MLO Flit (a thin oil) on the marsh
immediately  after snow melt  and weekly application of Malathion in the camp-
grounds from  June thru August  by the Douglas  County Sanitation Department (G.
Ferell, Sanitarian,  Douglas County, OR, pers. comm.).

     The USFS  recognized the potential  deleterious effects of cultural  eutro-
phication  resulting from increased visitor  use.   Periodic blooms of algae were
noted  at  Diamond Lake  even  in the 1930's  (Hughes,  1970).   In 1966 the waste
collection  and  treatment needs  were  evaluated.   Considering visitor use pro-
jections and possible  health  and aesthetic consequences  of continued  use of
the existing septic tank and pit toilet facilities, a  plan was designed for an
improved sanitation  system including "modern  comfort  stations,  sewer  connec-
tions  for  house  trailers and camper  trucks, improved water supply connections
and  services,  fish  cleaning   facilities  and other  conveniences"  (Burgess,
1966).  Wastes from  the campgrounds at the south and  east sides of the  lake,
the trailer  court and the resort along the east  and northeast section were to
be  diverted  to  a series  of lagoons outside  the watershed.  Along  the west
shore  of the lake,  the  former  YMCA camp, summer  homes and Thielson View  Camp-
ground  would not be  connected  but  pit or septic  tank-type systems would be
replaced with vaults which  could be periodically  pumped.   In 1970 the  first
use was made of  on-line  facilities at East  Shore  Campground.   By December  1975
all planned connections had been completed (Table 1).
                                      3

-------
                  TABLE 1.   VISITOR USE AND CHRONOLOGY OF  WASTEWATER  DIVERSION
Date of
Site Diversion
East Shore 4 stages:
Campground 9/69, 11/70
11/72, 06/73
South Shore 11/72
Picnic Area
Broken Arrow 08/74
Campground
Diamond Lake
Improvement Co. 06/75
Diamond Lake
Trailer Court 12/75
Thielson View —
Campground
Noble Fir
Summer Homes —
YMCA
Totals —
69
179.
5.
27.
221.
67.
8.
—
39.
5.
555.
4
4
7
4
8
8

2
3
0
70
178.
7.
24.
209.
72.
14.
0.
40.
5.
552.
Visitor Days (xlO3)
71 72 73
8
7
4
7
0
2
2
0
3
3
210
3.3
15.5
138
63.4
20
0.1
18.2
2.5
471.0
207.3
4.6
3.8
136
64
27.7
0.1
20.2
0
463.7
221.9
5.4
13.7
146
59.5
38.9
0.1
36.8
0
522.3
74
201.4
7.0
closed
160*
64.6
49.9
0.1
43.8
closed
526.8
75
247.0
4.3
10.4
182.7
37.8
58.0
0.1
49.8
closed
590.1
76
247.0
2.4
34.9
226.8
46.6
52.7
0.1
58.2
closed
668.7
77
221.0
3.3
63.0
235.1
46.6
52.0
—
47.2
closed
668.2
Our interpolation - not USFS data

-------
     In  1971  the  USFS and  the  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency  (EPA)
signed a  Memorandum of Agreement  for  a  study to determine  the existing lake
trophic status, sources of  nutrients or  other pollution, and whether signifi-
cant improvement could be  detected as a result of the new waste collection and
treatment system.   The National  Eutrophication  Research Program,  established
within EPA  as  a result of national  interest  in  water quality,  had  as  one of
its objectives the determination of the effectiveness of various lake restora-
tion techniques.  The Diamond Lake project offered an excellent opportunity to
assess the effects  of nutrient diversion on lake trophic condition.

    The raw data generated during this study is reported in an Appendix as the
Environmental Protection Agency's Special Report  EPA-600/8-79-017b.   The data
report is available from  the National  Technical Information Service, Spring-
field, VA  22161.

-------
                                  CONCLUSIONS

1.    Diamond Lake  is  mesotrophic to eutrophic as a result of natural nutrient
     loading from the  tributaries, groundwater and sediments.

2.    The  nutrient  contribution from cultural activities  in  the  watershed is,
     at present, relatively insignificant compared to natural  sources.

3.    During the  period  of this  investigation no  change  was  found in the tro-
     phic status of the lake that could be attributed to the wastewater diver-
     sion system.

4.    The  trophic status  of Diamond Lake is  appropriate  in satisfying present
     recreational demands.

-------
                                RECOMMENDATIONS

     The present trophic  status  of Diamond Lake  should  be  perpetuated.   Cul-
tural  activity  and  development  should  be managed  to  minimze  the  artificial
nutrient supply  to the lake.

     Surveillance of  Diamond  Lake's  trophic  status  should continue.   It  is
recommended  that during   the  summer,  from  June  through September,  monthly
samples  be  collected  from the  center  station  at 1  meter for  nutrient  and
chlorophyll  analysis,  and that  Secchi  disc measurements be  made.   More fre-
quent sampling would be preferable.  Sampling and analytical techniques should
be comparable to those cited here.

     A nutrient  budget  should  be developd before  implementation  of  a plan to
alter the trophic status of any lake and should include an accurate assessment
of the groundwater contribution.

     When applying predictive models precise field measurements should be used
whenever available instead of estimates and generalizations.

-------
                           STUDY  DESIGN AND PROCEDURES

      The EPA field program began  in  June  1971.   Seven lake sampling stations
 were established.  Silent  Creek,  the major  inlet,  and Lake  Creek,  the only
 outlet,  were sampled  for chemical  characterization and to aid  in determining a
 nutrient budget.  Hydrologic  information was  provided  by  the U.S. Geological
 Survey (USGS).   Three lake stations were on  the  central  axis and four around
 the periphery,  adjacent to the  campgrounds,  summer  homes  and resort.  At the
 three deeper, center stations,  water was collected at 5-meter depth  intervals
 starting at the  surface  (e.g.,  0,  5,  10,  13 m at the deepest station).  Sam-
 ples were collected at the surface  and 5 m from the peripheral stations.

      In  1973 sampling  of Short Creek  was initiated, but  the number of lake
 sampling sites  was reduced to  4  by eliminating the Thielson View,  north-center
 and south-center  stations.  A two way  analysis  of  variance, with  dates and
 sites as the factors, demonstrated no significant chemical differences between
 lake stations  at the 0.05 level  of  significance.   In 1974 water sampling at
 the 3 peripheral  stations was  discontinued  for  the  same  reason, but benthic
 macroinvertebrate sampling was continued.  This same year,  intermittent tribu-
 taries were added.  Camp, Dry,  Porcupine,  Rabbit, Spruce  and Two Bear Creeks
 were sampled to  lend more precision  to the  nutrient budget.  The four lake
 sampling stations retained throughout  the study are shown in  Figure  2.

      Sampling was monthly  from  soon  after  ice-out  until  the weather became
 restrictive,  usually  in October.   Winter  samples were  collected through the
 ice in 1972 and  1975.

      Lake water was collected with a PVC  Van Dorn bottle  and distributed to
polyethylene containers.  Tributaries  were  sampled by dipping the  polyethylene
containers  directly.    Specific  conductance,  pH  and  dissolved  oxygen  (DO)
determinations were done in the  field, in situ when possible.  From 1975-77, a
multiple parameter sensing unit was  used.  The  New  England Research Associ-
ates, Inc.  Model  4 Environmental Monitor (NERA Inc,  Bedford, MA) recorded jn
situ  temperature,  conductance, pH, DO,  redox  potential and depth.  Earlier DO
analysis  followed the  azide  modification  of  the Winkler  method.  Data  were
recorded  at 1  m  intervals  from  surface  to  bottom  at  the  center station.
Transparency was measured with  a 20 cm  Secchi  disc.

     Chemical analyses generally were done at  the EPA  laboratory in Corvallis.
Samples  for nutrient  and metals analysis were field  stabilized  with mercuric
chloride  and nitric  acid,  respectively, before transportation.    Standard EPA
methodology (EPA, 1971)  generally was followed.

      Chlorophyll  analyses were  conducted  according  to Strickland and Parsons
 (1965) as modified by EPA  (1973),  and primary  productivity was assessed by the
 14C  method  described  by  Goldman  et  aj.  (1971).  Light  was  measured  with a


                                      8

-------
 Scale
O
              Figure 2.   Lake bathymetry and  sampling sites.




                                    9

-------
Lambda Instruments  LI  185 Quantum/Radiometer/Photometer with a LI 192S under-
water quantum sensor.  Measuring sensitivity was between approximately 400 and
700 nm.

     Phytoplankton samples were collected along with those for chemical analy-
sis.  From 1971 to 1973 they were preserved in 3-5% formalin and counted using
a  Sedgewick-Rafter  counting  cell  in a modification of the clump count (Ameri-
can  Public  Health Association,  1971).   The  modification involved determining
an  average  number of cells for all  filamentous  forms and multiplying this by
the number of filaments to give a final  estimated cell number.

     Samples  collected from  1974  through  1977  were  preserved  with Lugol's
solution  and  counted and identified using an inverted microscope (Lund, 1958,
EPA,  1973).   Direct  cell  counts were made except in the case of forms such as
Eudorina, Pandorina,  Coelastrum and Gloeotrichia where colonies were counted.
Counts  of Melosira  and  Oscillatoriaceae were  expressed as  number  of 100 urn
lengths and included with  the cell counts.

     Center station profiles have been reduced to a volume weighted mean (VWM)
for  the  lake.   Using a bathymetric  chart a volume was  associated with each of
the  depths  sampled.   For  example, the volume associated  with the 10 m sample
is:

                    Vio = [(A7.s + AH. s)/2:i x (11.5 m  - 7.5 m)

where A7  5  =  the area associated with the  7.5 m contour and A11-5 = the area
of  the  1*1.5 m contour.  The solution  (V10)  would be the volume of a cylinder
with base area  (A7>5 + A11>5)/2 and  length (11.5  m -  7.5 m).  A similar calcu-
lation was  made  for  the  o'ther sample depths  using  appropriate contour areas
and  lengths of  water column.   The  whole  lake VWM  for any  parameter,  then,
would be:


                         x =   I  V1 - x.  / VL
                              i=o

where V. =  the volume of the  sampled  strata; x. =  the  concentration of the
.  = the  volume of  the  sampled strata;  x.
1strata and V.  =  the  sum  of  the volumes  of
sampled strata  and  V,  = the sum of the volumes of the 4 strata (the volume of
the lake).1  Chemistry samples were generally collected at 0, 5, 10, and 13 m.
Primary productivity  and chlorophyll  a  were usually measured at  0,  1, 4, 7,
10, and  13 m.   The calculation strategy  is the  same  for both regimes.  All
lake concentrations and phytoplankton cell numbers discussed are VWM's unless
otherwise  defined.  The average concentrations for the various tributaries are
arithmetic means - not volume weighted according to flow.
     Hutchinson (1957) describes the formula for volume of a lake  stratum as
                    Vm =  
-------
     Triplicate benthos samples were  collected  in 1971 and  1972  with  a Ponar
grab, washed in the field through  a U.S.  Standard No.  30 (0.59 mm) mesh screen
and  preserved  in  10%  formalin.   In subsequent  years,  four  samples  were  col-
lected at each site.  A U.S.  Standard No.  60 (0.25 mm) mesh screen was  used in
laboratory sample  rinsing to  reduce  the loss  of small  forms.   The retained
organisms were  preserved  in  70%  alcohol, and,  where  possible,  identified to
species.

     Benthic community  structure  was  characterized  with  several  common  mea-
sures or  indices.   Estimates  of  richness  (number of species) and diversity (a
function of richness  and  species  frequency distribution) were calculated from
only  the  number of  identified species plus taxa apparently  composed  of  only
one  species rather  than  the  total number of taxa, to increase the reliability
of station- to- station comparisons.

     Species area!  richness,  expressed   here  as  the  number  of  species  per
single grab  was calculated  according to Hurlbert  (1971).   The  following in-
dices were  calculated  from   pooled  replicate  grab  samples  at  each station.
Dominance concentration  as  indicated  by  Simpson's diversity  index  (Simpson,
1949) gives the probability that any two  individuals drawn from a multispecies
assemblege will  be the  same.   This  index  is  not greatly affected  by sample
size; its complement  (Mclntosh,  1967) was calculated  to  relate  it positively
to diversity:
                                 _
                        1  " S'L  =
                                         N (N - 1)
Where N is  the  number of individuals, n.  is  the number of individuals in the
i   species  and S is the number of  species.

     Species diversity,  as  indicated  by  the popular Shannon-Weaver expression
(Pielou,  1970)(a  measure  of  the mean  diversity per  individual  integrating
concepts of  both richness and species frequency),  was calculated by:

                    S    n.        n,
              H1  = -I    -J Iog10 (-1)
                   1=1

     Numerical  classification  or  cluster analysis of the  data  (Boesch,  1977;
Swartz,  1978) was performed using the program CLUSTER on Oregon State Univer-
sity's CDC  3300 computer to describe  spatial and temporal  faunal  homogeneity
between  collections.
                                      11

-------
                         DIAMOND  LAKE CHARACTERISTICS

STUDY SITE

     Diamond  Lake  has  a  surface area  of  1243 ha  and a total  watershed of
approximately  142  km2.  Maximum  depth  is 14.3 m while the  average is 7.2 m.
The  volume  is  approximately 9.02 x  107  m3.  Hydraulic  retention time averages
1.5  years.  The lake is elongated on a  north-south axis, approximately 5.5 km
long by 2.5  km wide (Figure 2).  Basin  morphometry  is regular with a single
central depression.

     The  topography  and  geology  of the area  is  dominated by  its volcanic
history.  The  basin  is  flanked by  the  High Cascade  volcanoes,  Mt. Thielson
(2799 m)  and  Mt. Bailey (2549  m).   Timber  Crater  (2256 m) marks the southern
point of  the watershed.  The soils are in the "Crater Lake Series," porous and
well drained, with  greater than 1.5m volcanic ash and pumice (D. Hanson, Soil
Scientist,  Douglas  Co.  OR,  pers. comm.).  They include glacial debris, pumice
and  ash from the eruption  of  Mt. Mazama which collapsed to  form the caldera
containing  Crater Lake (Purdom,  1964).   The bedrock  is basaltic,  the remnant
of lava flows  from Mts. Bailey and Thielson.

     The  watershed  contains  mostly coniferous  forest  with  lodgepole  pine
(Pinus  contorta),  mountain  hemlock  (Tsuga mertensiana), and  firs (Abies sp.)
predominating.   The groundcover  includes huckleberry (Vaccinium sp.), grasses
(Graminae), sedges  (Carex sp.), and manzanita (Arctostaphylos sp.) (Meyerhoff,
1977).   At the south end of the lake is a 60 ha marsh.

HYDROLOGY

     Silent Creek  drains an  area of  approximately  36 km2  at  the southwest
corner  of  the  lake's watershed,  accounting for about  25% of the total.  The
water is generally  very  cold  and clear.  After a  storm in 1977, however, the
stream was  humic brown,  suggesting an influence from the  marsh through which
it flows.   Silent Creek accounted for an average of  56% of  the total measur-
able inflow during  the  study.   Percent contribution  ranged  from 26% during a
month  of extreme  precipitation  to  78% when  precipitation was  negligible.
Maximum recorded  flow was  3.233 x 106 m3/mo for June  1972,  while the minimum
was  1.715  x 106  m3/mo  recorded for February  1974.   The  average annual input
for the  study period was 28.005 x 106  rnVyr (Figure 3).

     The  other  major tributary,  Short Creek, averaged 20%  of the measurable
inflow.   The  range  for monthly flow over  the study  period was 0.613  x 106
m3/mo to  1.370  x 106 m3/mo with  an  annual average of 10.007 x  106  m3/yr.  The
stream  originates  as a large  spring only a few hundred meters  from the lake
and runs extremely cold and clear throughout the year.
                                      12

-------
                          INPUT
    20-
            \ xx v Precipitation
             °    \
    10-
ro
in
 O
 Short Creek


 Misc. Creeks
_^k*«M^^M^H^^^^H
 ~~ I ~~ I    f
                         OUTPUT
    60-
 o
 >
    40-
    20-
                Evaporation r
                          *»t
                       mx
                              ,0*..
                    o                     I  o i
          JFMAMJJASOND
MONTH
  Jan
  Feb
  Mar
  Apr
  May
  Jun
  Jul
  Aug
  Sep
  Oct
  Nov
  Dec
                                                      Vol.(xl05m3)
 IN
56.14
42.85
49.06
39.42
49.31
5 1.04
37.49
36.37
34.85
38.79
48.97
53.05
OUT
69.91
53.72
65.26
51. 17
51.06
70.53
47.34
33.97
33.98
53.72
67.83
65.46
            Figure 3.  Average monthly hydrological  budget (1972-1977).

-------
      The intermittent tributaries to Diamond  Lake have significant flow only
 during snow melt.  Their maximum contribution was 30%  of the directly measur-
 able  inflow, 1.863 x  106 mVmo  in  June  1974.  The average annual contribution
 was only 3%.

      Precipitation was measured as water  falling directly  onto the lake.   In
 November 1973 it  accounted for  64% of  that month's directly measurable input
 at 5.084 x  106 m3/mo  (41  cm).   Maximum  contribution generally occurred in the
 winter (Figure 3).  Yearly  precipitation ranged from a  low of 65 cm in 1976  to
 a high of  127 cm  in 1975, averaging 19%  of  the measurable input over the study
 period.

      Groundwater   input  was estimated  by   subtracting  measurable  inflow from
 measurable  outflow.   Over  the  six-year study period  an  average 21%  of the
 outflow was unaccounted for by  measured inflow  and was attributed to ground-
 water.

      Water  loss  has  three  possible significant components:   surface outflow,
 evaporation and groundwater export.   The USGS supplied data for the first two
 but  no estimate  for groundwater export  could  be  gained.  Since measured out-
 flow  was  greater than inflow throughout  the  study, groundwater  losses  were
 assumed  to be zero.

      Surface outflow  is  continuous  but the  rate is  regulated by  the  DFW.
 Flashboards  are  generally  installed in Lake  Creek after  spring runoff  to
 maintain the lake level  during the summer, then  removed in the fall.  Maximum
 outflow  is generally in the winter (Figure 3)  but the highest flow gaged was
 in  June 1974, at 10.711 x  106  mVmo.  Minimum flow measured was  1.040  x 106
 mVmo in September 1975.

     Greatest evaporation occurs in July or August.  The maximum reported over
 the study  period  was 1.431  x 106 m3  for July  1973.   In August 1974, evapora-
 tion was reported  equal to Lake Creek outflow.

 NUTRIENT BUDGET

     Major nutrient  sources to  Diamond  Lake include tributaries, groundwater,
precipitation, bottom  sediments  and human  activities.  Total natural  load is
defined  as  the   sum  of the  loads  from the  tributaries,  precipitation  and
groundwater.

     Silent  Creek,  the  dominant  hydrologic influence,  is also the main source
of phosphorus (P).  Over the study period the average total  phosphorus concen-
tration  (TP) for  Silent  Creek was 0.056 mg/1.   Its average  yearly P contribu-
 tion was 1549 kg, accounting  for an  average 61%  of the total measurable nat-
 ural load (Table 2).

     The P contribution from Short  Creek  averaged  22% of the  total  natural
 load from  1972 through 1977 (Table 2).  The average concentration was approxi-
mately 0.055 mg P/l  resulting in an average yearly  load of 548 kg.
                                      14

-------
TABLE 2.  NUTRIENT CONTRIBUTIONS FROM NATURAL SOURCES


Sil
ent Cr.
Short
Cr.
Interm
Str.
Precip.
Ground
H20
TOTAL
Phosphorus

1972
73
74
75
76
77
Avg


1972
73
74
75
76
77
Avg
kg
1766
1586
1320
1429
1528
1662
1549

kg
262
640
412
457
355
313
407
%tot
57
65
57
56
64
67
61

%tot
4
13
6
6
8
9
8
kg
691
527
409
589
522
549
548

kg
259
338
200
168
177
133
213
%tot
22
22
18
23
22
22
22

%tot
4
7
3
2
4
4
4
kg
162
6
105
58
57
16
67
Inorganic
kg
60
1
43
24
27
5
27
%tot
5
0
5
2
2
1
3
Nitrogen
%tot
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
kg
125
129
126
137
71
96
114

kg
515
529
516
565
291
395
469
%tot
4
5
5
5
3
4
4

%tot
7
10
7
8
6
12
8
kg
353
201
341
341
218
143
266

kg
6271
3564
6055
6046
3871
2531
4723
%tot
11
8
15
13
9
6
10

%tot
85
70
84
83
82
75
80
kg
3097
2449
2301
2554
2396
2466
2544

kg
7367
5072
7226
7260
4721
3377
5837

-------
     The  average  concentration of the intermittent streams  from  1973 through
1976 was  0.033  mg P/l.   The intermittent streams were not sampled before 1973
and only  Two  Bear Creek had significant flow in 1977.  Two Bear Creek exhibi-
ted the  highest average TP of all sources measured,  approximately 0.071 mg/1.
It  drains  the  resort  complex.   The  TP  contribution  from the  intermittent
streams  was only about  3% of  the total,  insignificant compared  to  the major
tributaries and groundwater.

     Groundwater  loading was estimated from analyses  of well water  (Table  3,
Figure 2)  together with surface outflow minus inflow volume calculations.  The
P  load was based on total dissolved phosphorus  (TOP)  rather than TP since the
turbid well water resulted in  unrealistically high TP  concentrations (mean =
0.287 mg/1, n = 26, excluding 2 values of 11.9 and 5.1 mg/1).  Average TOP was
0.020 rag/1  (n  = 27, one value of 0.48 ing/1  excluded).  The groundwater contri-
bution,  then,   averaged  an estimated  10%  of  the external  P  load.   Average
yearly load was  266 kg.1

     Precipitation, while  averaging approximately 19%  of the  yearly inflow,
contributed only  about  4%  of  the annual  P  load.  Total  phosphorus concentra-
tion of  precipitation was  estimated  from  analyses of  composited  snow cores
collected  in  the springs of 1973,  74, 75  and 76 (Table  4).  The average was
<0.009 mg P/l.   Loading from  direct  precipitation on  the  lake  averaged 114
kg/yr.


                            TABLE 4.  SNOW ANALYSIS


  Date          TP        TSP         OOP        NH3       N02       N03     KjlN
12/15/73
05/10/74
03/05/75
06/05/75
05/20/76
AVG
<.005
.01
<.01
<.01
.01
<.009
<.005
<.005
<.01
<.01
.01
<.008
.004
.01
<.005
<.005
.005
<.006
.021
—
.024
.005
.03
.02
.001 .018 .3
.3
<.l
.1
.15
<.19
     Sediment samples collected  in  1971  averaged 520 |jg P/g dry sediment with
a range  of 340  to  700  ug/g (Sanville and  Powers,  1971).   Interstitial  water
averaged  250  ug  ortho  phosphate-P/1.   No  attempts  were  made  to measure  P
contribution  from sediments directly.   Yearly nutrient  loading  calculations
for  1972  through 1976 show  an  average  retention of approximately  40%  of the
external P load.  In 1977, however,  it appears that 2% more left the lake than
entered (Table 5).
     Short Creek might  be  representative of groundwater.  The creek is essen-
     tially a spring  which enters the lake after  flowing  above ground only a
     few hundred meters.   If  Short  Creek data were used,  the average TP load
     from groundwater would be  746 kg/yr or  an average of  25%  of the total
     load.
                                      16

-------
TABLE 3.  WELL WATER ANALYSIS




06/14/7?
06/26/72
(mjl) 07/10/72
07/25/72
06/14/72
06/26/72
(m /I) 07/10/72
07/25/72
06/14/72
06/26/72
(mg™ °7/10/72
07/25/72
1
Summer
Homes #1
.003
.03
.002
.016
.012
.001
.001
.056
.113
.032
.032
>.003
2
Summer
Homes #2
.08
.208
.054
.050
.004
<.001
.002
.11
.043
.025
.060
.055
3
Summer
Homes #3
.16
.381
.077
.075
.002
<.001
<.001
.061
.055
.049
.053
.054
4
Campsite
R6
.94
11.9
.115
.385
.005
.004
.003
.072
.197
.324
.395
.308
5
Trai ler
Disposal
.029
.243
.008
.32
.015
.002
<.001
.084
.357
.875
.838
.868
6
Resort
Cabins
5.1
1.57
.055
.240
.001
<.001
<.005
.053
.164
.143
.184
.171
7
Resort
Parking
.082
.4
.058
1.87
.008
.014
.022
.48
.936
1.226
1.683
>.177

-------
                   TABLE 5.  PHOSPHORUS INPUT* MINUS OUTPUT


Year
1972
73
74
75
76
77
Input
(kg TP)
3097
2449
2301
2554
2396
2466
Output
(kg TP)
2619
1499
858
1256
1510
2514

In-Out
478
950
1443
1298
886
-48
%
Retention
+ 15
+ 39
+ 63
+ 51
+ 37
-2
*    Refers to "natural"  input by tributaries, groundwater and precipitation.


     One  indirect approach  for  determining sediment  P  contribution involves
accounting for the change  in the mass of P in the water over some time period,
the  load  into the lake and the export from the lake (Schindler et al., 1973).
Total  mass  of P at any  time  is calculated  from the lake  volume  and the TP
volume  weighted  mean.   For application  of this approach two time periods were
distinguished, summer  and winter.  Since tributaries  were  not sampled during
the winter, concentrations were estimated by averaging the last three analyses
of the  preceding summer with the first three  of the succeeding summer (e.g.,
August  18,  September 15 and October  14,  1976  with April 28,  June  2 and July
20,  1977).   Winter  external  loading (import  and export)  values are  not as
reliable  as  those for  summer and may limit confidence in  the sediment P re-
lease  calculations.   (Note:  Two  TP analyses of  Silent Creek  were  unchar-
acteristic, 0.310 mg/1  on October 7, 1971, and  0.270  mg/1  on August 7, 1974,
and were disregarded  as  outliers in all loading  and budget calculations.)

     Sediments showed a net P accumulation from September 1971 to October 1977
(Table  6).   However, substantial quantities  were apparently  released in the
winters of  1973-74  and 1976-77.   The greatest calculated release was  2316 kg
during  the winter of 1976-77.   Considering that the greatest  sediment P con-
tribution probably originates below 13 m where low DO is common, this quantity
is comparable to P release determined by Larsen et aj.  (1978) in Shagawa Lake,
Minnesota.  Maximum  accumulation of  P  also appeared  to occur  during winter
periods—the winter of 1971-72 being highest at 7063 kg.

     Rooted aquatic  vascular plants  might be another possible internal nutri-
ent  load  source.  At maximum density approximately  30-50% of the  bottom of
Diamond Lake  is  covered  by vegetation.   This area occupies  the  zone  roughly
between 2 and  8  meters.  No attempts were made to measure P contribution from
this source, but excretion of  P by aquatic vascular plants  is well documented
(e.g.,  McRoy et  aJK , 1972 and DeMarte and Hartman, 1974).  Death and decay of
the plants in  the fall would also add  to the phosphorus pool.  Large mats of
Elodea  and  Potomogeton  wash up  on  the  shore during storms,  indicating the
potential  for  a  large  nutrient influx.   Every fall waterfowl  arrive in great
numbers at Diamond Lake.  Feeding on aquatic weeds, they hasten the decomposi-
tion of the plants and the recycling of the contained nutrients.
                                     18

-------
                    TABLE 6.   SEDIMENT CONTRIBUTION TO  TP

Period
09/27/71-05/24/72
05/24/72-08/22/72
08/22/72-05/23/73
05/23/73-10/18/73
10/18/73-06/05/74
06/05/74-10/09/74
10/09/74-06/05/75
06/05/75-10/22/75
10/22/75-05/20/76
05/20/76-10/14/76
10/14/76-04/28/77
04/28/77-10/27/77
A Lake
TP Mass (kg)
-8209
+ 451
-2345
- 541
+1804
+ 631
+1083
- 541
-2255
+ 631
+2706
-1804
In-Out (kg)*
-1146
+ 326
+ 719
+ 506
+ 234
+ 532
+ 909
+ 535
+ 311
+ 456
+ 390
+ 99
Net
Sediment
Release (-) or
Accumulation (+)
+7063
- 125
+3064
+1047
-1570
- 99
- 174
+1076
+2566
- 175
-2316
+1903
+12,260 kg
*    Refers to "natural" input by tributaries,  groundwater and precipitation
     minus output by Lake Creek.
                                      19

-------
     Analysis  of rainbow  trout taken  from the  lake  indicated a  dry weight
concentration  of 1.7% P.  Table 7 shows that the annual fish harvest removes a
substantial amount  of  P.   The record catch of  1973  removed approximately 550
kg P.  Stocking of  trout is a minor nutrient source.  The average yearly total
mass  of  fish  stocked  from 1971 through  1977 was 3450  kg,  amounting  to only
approximately 15 kg P.

     Fishing  practices can  contribute to  the  nutrient load.   McHugh (1972)
reported  an estimate of  one ton  (~900kg)  of cheese used  in  Diamond  Lake in
less  than  one week as bait. Assuming  10,400  angler  days in a busy week (July
2, 3,  4,  1977,  recorded 4472 angler days)(J.  Bauer,  District Fishery Biolo-
gist,  DFW,  pers.  comm.) and 0.77% P in pasteurized  processed American cheese
(wet  weight)(Adams, 1975), the  1977  fishing season  (102,043  angler days)(J.
Bauer, pers.  comm.) could  have added nearly 70  kg  P to the lake.  This quan-
tity  is  about the same  as  the  annual  contribution  from all  intermittent
streams averaged over the study period.

     Total  inorganic nitrogen (TIN) appears  to  be  dominated by  the  ground-
water.  Analyses of unfiltered well water averaged 0.355 mg TIN/1  (Table 3).
While  all   other surface  sources averaged  less than  10%  of the  yearly load
(Silent Creek and precipitation each averaged 8%) the groundwater averaged 80%
(Table 2).1  The average  total  yearly load was  5837  kg TIN/yr,  however, no
attempt was made to quantify nitrogen  fixation and denitrification, processes
that greatly complicate N dynamics in an aquatic  system.

     Maximum  P and  N diverted by the wastewater  system were estimated.  Sam-
ples of wastewater collected at the main pumping station between 1973 and 1976
averaged 5.59  mg P/l  (Table 8).   Information supplied by the USFS (R.  Sawyer,
District  Engineering Assistant,  Diamond  Lake  Ranger  District,  USFS,  pers.
comm.) showed  that  lagoon  influent totaled 5.96  x  104  m3  in 1976 with 5.58 x
105 visitor days and 5.67  x 104  m3 in  1977 with 5.69 x 10s visitor days (avg.
= 0.103 mVvisitor day).  Total  influent includes groundwater intrusion to the
system.  The maximum P diverted  for 1976 and 77 was approximately 333 and 317
kg,  respectively,  or  14   and  13%  of  the  natural  loadings for  those years.
Total  inorganic  nitrogen  averaged  greater  than  12.39  mg/1,  equivalent  to  a
maximum diversion of over 738 kg in  1976 and 703 kg in  1977.

     Algal  assays of water collected  from Diamond Lake  in  July 1971 showed P
to be the potential  limiting or algal  growth controlling nutrient at that time
(Miller et  al_.,  1974).  A  sample  collected  at the end  of March  1972,  also
showed potential P  limitation  (T.  Shiroyama, unpublished data).  Other analy-
ses by  Shiroyama indicated N  limitation in  March and  August 1973.   The Na-
tional Eutrophication  Survey (EPA, 1978)  reported  N  limitation  in July and
October 1975,  based on N:P  ratios.   The nutrient limiting algal  growth does
commonly change  in  productive lakes (Greene et  al.,  1976).  Phosphorus could
become limiting during a bloom as  it is incorporated in the biomass.   Relative
     TIN from Short Creek averaged approximately 0.021 mg/1.  Using this value
     the average  load  from  groundwater would be approximatly 280 kg TIN/yr or
     20% of the average total load which would be reduced to about 1400 kg/yr.
     See note p.  16.

                                      20

-------
                         TABLE 7.   FISHERY CONTRIBUTION TO PHOSPHORUS BUDGET
                              1971      1972      1973      1974      1975      1976      1977


Wet Weight Fish               3640      2712      2091      3688      5922      3037      3057
  Stocked (kg)

Phosphorus Content              16.0      11.9       9.2      16.2      26.1       13.3      13.5
  Fish Stocked (kg) *

Wet Weight Fish             87,276    76,271   128,122   127,959    91,953    75,397    94,749
  Caught (kg)

Net to (+) or from (-)        -368.0    -323.7    -554.5    -546.8    -378.5     -314.4    -403.4
  Lake (kg TP)


*    Analysis of Diamond Lake Trout showed:   P = 1.68% x dry weight,  and
                                             Dry Weight = 26.4% x wet weight
                                             Therefore', P = 0.0044 x  wet weight

     Stocking and harvest data from Jerry Bauer, Ore.  DFW

-------
                      TABLE  8.   TP  AND TIN  IN WASTEWATER
Date
05/24/73
06/19/73
07/17/73
08/15/73
08/26/73
09/12/73
03/05/75
08/14/75
09/19/75
08/19/76
10/15/76
04/29/77
Avg.
TP
(ing/1)
0.06
5.15
8.75
6.6
0.97
2.7
0.8
14.5
9.5
—
6.9
—
5.59
TIN
(mg/1)
0.005
28.14
22.27
—
5.59
15.12
>2.1
>21
>9.1
>14
—
6.61
>12.39
to  the  nutritional  requirements of algae, however,  (Miller et aj[.,. 1976) the
external  loading  figures  suggest that N is proportionately less well supplied
to  Diamond  Lake  than  is  P.   Nitrogen  limitation  of  algal  growth  might be
expected.

PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES

     The  lake  is  a  temperate,  dimictic  water body  which  completely mixes in
the  spring and fall, stratifying  in  the summer and  in  winter under ice.  It
has  been  described  as  mesotrophic  to  eutrophic  based on  identification of
diatom  frustules  in  the  sediments   (Meyerhoff,  1977).  Sanville  and  Powers
(1971) characterized  the  lake  as "quite  productive"  but  not extremely eutro-
phic.

     Total  phosphorus concentrations  decreased from  1971 to  1973  (Figure 4).
Averages for those years were 0.062 and 0.028 mg P/l respectively,  a reduction
of  over 50%.   After 1973,  however,  there was  a gradual  increase,  reaching
0.051 mg/1  for 1977.  The  maximum TP,  0.133  mg/1 on September 27,  1971, is
uncharacteri sti c.
II 4. II
     Total phosphorus  data from 1971 through 1975 were pooled and compared by
 •t" test  at  the 0.05  level of  significance  to  pooled data from 1976 and 1977
when the  diversion was complete.  The 1976/77 average, 0.05 mg/1, was signifi-
cantly higher  than  the average of the previous five years, 0.03 mg/1 (exclud-
ing the  0.133 mg/1  value from 1971).  The  1977  average,  again approximately
0.05 mg/1, is different at the 0.01 level under the same condition.

     The  reasons  for the increase are unclear:   natural  variability is prob-
ably the  dominant factor.   At approximately 670,000  visitor days,  1976 and
1977 are  only  about  13% higher than  the  1975  recreation use total and virtu-
ally all  of that increase was served by the wastewater diversion system (Table

                                      22

-------
ro
GO
       .16-
    (S)
    cr  .12
    o
    O
    x  .08-
    CL
    O  .04
    h-
              1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
                       Figure 4. Total phosphorus volume weighted means.

-------
1).  Inflow dropped by over 20% from 1975 to 1976 and another 10% from 1976 to
1977.  This would  extend the hydraulic retention time of the lake which would
tend  to  exacerbate  eutrophic  conditions.   At  the same  time,  however,  the
natural  nutrient  loading decreased with the inflow  (Table  2).   The data show
(Table 5)  that in 1977  P washout exceeded natural input and Table 6 indicates
that the sediments are responsible for  releasing  large amounts  of P.  Sediment
release  apparently provided  sufficient  P  to  stimulate  and maintain  a  large
phytoplankton  population during the summer of 1977.   Apparently it reaccumu-
lated in the sediments by the end of the  summer.

     Total  inorganic  nitrogen yearly  averages  show  no  particular  pattern
(Figure  5).  The  maximum concentration  was  0.389 mg TIN/1  on  August 14, 1973
and  relatively high  values were found  in 1972, 1976 and 1977.   Over the whole
study  period,  however,   28 of  the  34  values were less than 0.060 mg/1  (Table
9).  Total inorganic nitrogen was not determined in 1974.

     The initial  Secchi  disc measurement each  year  was  at  or   near the lowest
value  for that year (Figure 6).  The lowest recorded transparency was 2.1 m on
September  27,  1971,  but  similar measurements were made in June 1971 and April
1977.  Highest values for  any given year generally  occurred in early summer,
with  a maximum of 10.5  m observed on  June 27,  1972, and  again  on July 10,
1974.  The highest yearly average was  7.4  m  in 1974; the  lowest was  4.1,  in
1971.

     The Secchi  disc  data suggest an improvement in water transparency.  The
proportion  of  measurements >5  m  is  higher for  1976/77  than for 1971-75.  In
1977 the average  summer  Secchi disc reading was  6.3 m (SD  1.99, n = 7).  The
DFW  measured  transparency biweekly in  the  summer of  1963;  their average was
6.0  (SD  = 2.60,  n = 7).   On July  18,  1961  they  reported 11.6  m,  the highest
value  recorded, but that same year they also reported the lowest value,  1.8 m
on August 21.

     Dissolved oxygen depletion occurs  below 10 m  in  both  summer and winter.
Values less than  5 mg/1  were recorded  each  summer  at 13 m, with a low of 0.1
mg/1 on  August 18, 1977  (Table 10).   Lowest summer  DO was  recorded in either
July or  August of  each year except 1971 when 0.2 mg/1  was measured at 13 m on
September  1.   September  storms  generally caused overturn and reoxygenated the
lower  strata.  Winter  DO was measured  under the ice on February  2,  1972 and
March  3, 1975. Bottom DO was very low in  both cases, 0.5  and 1.5 mg/1, re-
spectively.  Values <5  mg/1  extended  as  high  as 10 m in  July and August of
1971 and 1977  as  well  as in both winter samplings.  Low DO in  the hypolimnion
was  apparent  as  early as  1946.  In August  of  that year the DFW reported 4.8
and 0.3 mg DO/1 at  13.7 and 15.2 m, respectively (Locke,  1947).

     Diamond Lake  pH  ranged  from a high of 9.8 at the surface  on June 4, 1971
to a low of 5.5  at  13   m  on  August 22, 1972.   The  highest  value  for  any day
usually occurred between  4 and 7 m,  while the lowest was at the bottom.

PRIMARY PRODUCERS

     Algal  cell  counts   from  1971  through  1973 can not  be compared  to 1974
through  1977 numbers  because of different counting techniques (the latter per-
iod generating higher numbers).  However, the pattern of phytoplankton numbers

                                     24

-------
      .32-
   LU
   §.24
   tr
(NJ
tn
      .16-
   o
   o:
   2 .08
                                                      III
||
 imi   i  .111       ii ii i  	    Miii     i iitii     iinn i
1971   '  1972  '   1973  '  1974  '   1975  !  1976  '   1977

     Figure 5. Total  inorganic nitrogen volume weighted means.

-------
TABLE 9:   TP AND TIN  VOLUME WEIGHTED MEANS (MG/L)

TP
TIN

TP
TIN

TP
TIN

TP
TIN

TP
TIN

TP
TIN

TP
TIN

06/03
.048
.006

02/02
.034
.143

05/23
.021

06/05
.035

03/04
__

05/20
.023
.013

04/28
.06
.017

07/07
.036
.024

05/24
.042
.003

06/18
.021
.064

07/10
.013

06/05
.054
.056

06/29
.052
.017

06/02
.04
.012
1971
08/03
.054
.025
1972
06/29
.043
.014
1973
07/10
.024
.055
1974
08/07
.013
1975
07/09
.027
.011
1976
07/21
.050
.199
1977
06/15
.04
.014

09/01 09/27
.037 .133
.021 .019

07/24 08/22
.041 .047
.019 .035

08/14 09/11 10/18
.043 .042 .015
.389 .018 .058

09/12 10/09 12/03
.032 .042 .037

08/13 09/18 10/22
.019 .039 .048
.012 .025 .012

08/18 09/15 10/14
.034 .041 .030
.079 .024 .054

06/30 07/20 08/18 09/27 10/27
.04 .06 .08 .05 .04
.017 .029 .050 .111 .037
Annual
Average
.062
.019

.041
.043

.028
.117

.029

.037
.023

.038
.064

.051
.036
                    26

-------
ro
-xl
      12.0-
   o  9.0 H
   UJ
   cr
       6.0-
   o:
       3.0-
               1971   '  1972  '   1973  '   1974  '   1975  '   1976  '   1977
                           Figure 6.  Secchi disc transparency.

-------
                                  TABLE 10.   DISSOLVED OXYGEN AT 13 M (MG/L)
ro
CO
     Date
     D.O.
     Date
     D.O.
     Date
     D.O.
     Date
     D.O.
     Date
     D.O.
     Date
     D.O.
     Date
     D.O.
06/03     07/07
 9.9
         1971
         08/03
           09/01     09/27
1.9
02/02    05/24
  0.7
 1972
06/29
0.2
7.8
                  07/24     08/22     09/25
 0.5      5.3       5.0       2.6       7.6       7.8
                    1973
05/23    06/18    07/10    08/14    09/11     1Q/18
 9.2      4.0      5.4      2.9      6.0      9.4
                    1974
06/05    07/10    08/07    09/12    10/09    12/03
 8.6      4.9      4.0      —       --      10.5
                    1975
03/04    06/05    07/09    08/13    9/18    10/22
 1.7      2.6      7.2      1.2     2.7      9.1
                    1976
05/20    06/29    07/21    08/18    09/15    10/14
 8.3      8.4      0.3      5.0
                    1977
04/28    06/02    06/15    06/30    07/20    08/18    09/27
 11.1     8.7      —       2.5      1.7      0.1      8.3
                                                    10/27
                                                     8.7

-------
ever  the  study period is similar  to the TP curve  (Figure 7).   iota!
bers, averaged  over each year, decreased from 1971 to 1973 and rose from 1974
to 1977, when the average reached approximately 9,000 cells/ml.

      Initial  samplings  each year yielded relatively  high  counts,  usually due
to an early  bloom of  the diatom, Asterionella formosa (Table 11).  The highest
count of this species, 17,000 cells per ml, was recorded on June 4, 1971.

      Almost  exclusively Anabaena  circinalis was  the  predominant blue-green
alga  in Diamond  Lake, generally reaching substantial numbers by July o^ August
and often  the most numerous alga  in September  or  October.   Its earliest pre-
dominance  was June 18,  1973,  and  it remained the most  numerous alga  for the
rest  of that  season.   The  highest density  recorded  for Anabaena was 12,000
cells/ml on August  18, 1977.

      Green  algae dominated  the  phytoplankton on  only  a few  occasions.   The
maximum concentration was 1200  cells/ml.

      A  Chrysophyte,  Chromulina sp. ,  seemed to become much more significant in
the  phytoplankton   community  after  1973,  perhaps  because  of  the change  in
counting  technique.   Its  maximum concentration was 8200 cells/ml  on  July 10,
1974.   In  about  one-half  of the post-1973 samplings  Chromulina was the domi-
nant  alga,  including  all  of the 1977  samplings  except  August  18,  when it was
second to Anabaena.

     Maximum  chlorophyll  a  (Chi  a) was  39.8 mg/m3  on  April  28,  1977.   The
highest  annual  average,  14.0  mg/m3,  also  occurred that  year.   The  lowest
annual  average was 4.8  mg/m3  in 1973.  The years 1976  and  1977 were  unusual
compared to  previous  years  because spring Chi  a was  high at the initial  sam-
pling (Figure  8).   Relatively  high values at the  end of the summer are char-
acteristic  of all  years.  The plot  of Chi  a resembles  the pattern of  TP and
ohytoplankton numbers.

     Summer  Chi  a and TP were positively correlated at the 0.05 level  over the
whole  study  period.  The  average  of pooled  epilimnetic  Chi  a  (not  volume
weighted)  from 1976/77  was  significantly  greater than  the  1971-1975  period,
also at the  0.05 level,  but 1976 alone is not significantly different from the
preceding  period suggesting that  it is a  transition year  (R.  Vollenweider,
Senior Scientist, Canada Center for Inland Waters, pers. comm.).

     Primary  productivity (PP) peaked  in 1973 with an  annual  average  of 19.8
mg C  fixed/m3/hr.   It  then  decreased  through 1976,  suggesting a  response  to
the diversion.   In  1977, however,  a substantial increase again occurred (Fig-
ure 9).  The  highest PP was 31.3 mg C fixed/mVhr on  September 11, 1973.

     The distribution patterns of  PP and Chi a  are  quite different.   Primary
productivity, a  rate  function,  is  affected by many variables during the incu-
bation  period while  Chi a  is  essentially  an instantaneous measurement,  the
result  of  an  integration  of  variables.    Phytoplankton  self-shading  could
reduce  PP  and,  correspondingly,  the ratio of PP to Chi  a.  The species compo-
sition  of  the  phytoplankton  population could also affect the ratio as  certain
species have relatively  less Chi a than  others.

                                      29

-------
co
o
              1000000-
    IOOOOOH




1   20000-


oo   10000-

li    5000-j
LJ
O


      1000-


      500-





       100-
                                                                           L.
                        1971  '  1972  '   1973  '  1974   '  1975  r~!976   '  1977
         Figure 7.  Total phytoplankton volume weighted means (horizontal bars indicate yearly means).

-------
                            TABLE 11.    DOMINANT PHYTOPLANKTON AT CENTER STATION,  VOLUME WEIGHTED MEANS
                                        (EXPRESSED AS NUMBERS PER ML X 102)
                               1971
                    06/03  07/07  08/03  09/11
                                                   1972                                    1973
                             02/02  05/24  06/28  07/25  08/22  09/26    05/23  06/18  07/10   08/14  09/11   10/18
Anabaena
       8.5
                     3.6     27      26
                              15     2.6    13     35     5.3
Anacystis
                     0.2
Ankistrodesmus
6.3
Asterionella
170    3.5
1.3    59     3.1
                       32
Chlamydomonas
Chromulina
Cryptomonas
                              0.3
                                   0.5
Cyclotella
5.2
Dactylococcopsis
              0.3
Dlnobryon cysts
Fraqllaria
                                                   0.6
                                                         0.7
Golenkinia
Heteromastix
Melosira
                                                   0.1
                                                                                       0.4
Nephroselmis
Ochromonas
Oocysti s
              0.7
                    0.2
                                                                                       0.5
                                                                      0.8
Rhodomonas
Schroederia
Sphaerocystls
              0.5
       0.1
0.3
Staurastrum
                                                                               1.0
Stephanodlscus
5.2
                                  0.4
                                                                                                     1.1    1.7
Stlpicoccus
Synedra
       0.1
                           3.9
                                     1.2
                                                                                                            1.2
Westell a
Green Flagellates    12     0.7    0.1     0.2
                              6.8
                                  0.4
                                                                                              0.7
Unldent Flag's
Unldent Coccoids
Unknown
                                                                                                   (Continued)

-------
        Table 11.   Continued
                                             1974
                           06/05  07/10   08/07  09/12   10/09   12/04
                                                             1975                                   1976
                                             03/03  06/05  07/09  08/13  09/18  10/15     05/20  06/30  07/21   08/17
        Anabaena
                     10
              8.4
                                12
                                3.2    2.2
                                      42
        Anacystls
        Anklstrodesmus
        Asterlpnella
2.2
                                       25    130
                                                               22      41
                                                                      13
        Chlamydomonas
                            0.7    0.9
        Chronul 1 na
       82
0.6
11
5.1
3.5    2.1
20     43     12     21
        Cryptomonas
                     1.1
              6.2
                                              1.5
        Cyclotella
                                                     17
        Oactylococcopsls
        Dlnobryon cysts
3.4
                                       5.1
        Fragllari'a
oo
ro
       GolenMnla
        Heteromastix
              12
       Melosira
        Nephroselmis
       Ochromonas
3.4
0.8
                  0.5
                                       0.7
       Oocystis
                            1.7
        Rhodomonas
3.6
0.6    1.7
       0.6
        Schroederla
        Sphaerocystls
              1.4
                                                     0.5
        Staurastrun
        Stephanodiscus
                                                                                 2.5
                                                                             30
        Stipoccus
        Synedra
                                                                                 1.4
       Westell a
                                                                          1.2
       Green Flagellates
                                                                                                  0.2
        Unldent Flag's
5.3
       Urn'dent Coccoids
       Unknown
                                                                          14
                                                                                                           (Continued)

-------
         Table 11.  Continued
                                         1976 (Cont'd)                              1977
                                         09/15   10/14           04/28  06/02  06/29  07/20  08/18  09/28  10/27

         Anabaena	30      40	20     120    30	
         Anacysti s	
         Anki strodesmus	
         Asterionella  	92     0.8    0.4	
         Chlamydomonas
co        Heteromastix
CO
                                                                                             10    12
         Chroinulina	40	2	130      13     9     33      11    41     20
         Cryptomonas	1.3	
         Cyclotella	
         Dactylococcopsls	
         Dinobryon cysts          	______	
         Fragilarla	______	
         Golenkinia	______________	
         Melosira
          Nephroselmis	    3    0.5
          Ochrononas	
          Oocystl s	
          Rhodoroonas	
          Schroederia	
          Sphaerocysti s	
          Staurastrum	
          Stephanodiscus	82	
          Stlplcoccus	
          Synedra	
          Westell a	
          Green  Flagellates	
          Unident Flag's	
          Unldent Coccolds	
          Unknown                                                        	

-------
   48.0-H
   36.0-
Q.  24.0
O
or
O
5  12.0
              hllll      Mill      I INN     Illll I   I  MM      1 INN    Mill I

             1971  '  1972  '   1973  '  1974  '   1975  '   1976  !   1977
                       Figure 8. Chlorophyll a^ volume weighted means.

-------
  ro
oo
en
    E

   O 28


    E
h-

>

h-
o
       21-
       14-
   O
   
-------
     A substantial part  of  the primary producer biomass was  contained in the
aquatic vascular  plants  and macrophytic algae.   Quantitative sampling was not
done but transect studies  were conducted with SCUBA  to  determine the general
community structure.  A well defined community was observed from approximately
2 to 8 meters, the transects showing three distinct bands.   From approximately
2 to 4 m  El odea canadensis was the dominant form.  Potomogeton praelongis and
E.  canadensis  co-dominated between 4  and 6  m,  the  zone  of  maximum density,
while Nitella sp.  dominated  from 6 to 8  m.

BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES

     The sediments  at the  center station were  typically  flocculent,  gray to
brownish organic  silt.   The peripheral station sediments were generally floc-
culent, light brown and often contained macrophytes.

     Only those  benthic  macroinvertebrate samples collected continuously from
1971  through  1977  at the  deep  center station  and  three of  the peripheral
stations are  considered  in this  report  (Figure  2).  The coefficient of varia-
tion  (CV)  of total number  of  organisms for  all  samples (N = 515) was almost
38,  ranging from 4 to 101  for each set of replicates.  The CV for the center
station averaged  23 while the inshore  stations  averaged from 42 to 46.  Data
from the peripheral  stations  in  1971  have not  been included in the following
comparisons due to the small number of samples collected that year.

     The temporal pattern  of  benthos   population density  was similar for all
four stations,  a decrease to  a  low in 1974  followed  by higher populations in
1976 and  1977 (Figure 10).  Densities  fluctuated greatly within  single years.
The  highest mean  population,  over 11,000/m2, was  reached at  the east  shore
camp  station in  August, 1972.   The lowest  mean population,  450/m2 was col-
lected at  the resort station  in  October,  1974.   Yearly  population means were
largest at the center station,  never lower than 5700/m2.

     Amphipods,  chironomids,  gastropods,  leeches  and oligochaetes comprised
the  major   faunal  groups of the  Diamond Lake benthos.   Forty different taxa
were  identified (Table  12).  The predominant species  and  the percent  composi-
tion of the major groups  on  a yearly basis are given  in Table 13.

     There  were  strong contrasts  in predominant  species  between  the  center and
peripheral  stations but little yearly temporal  change in predominant  species
within  any one  station.  The midge,  Chironomus decorus and the  oligochaete,
 Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri spiral is dominated  the  center station while along the
periphery  the midge, Tanytarsus  sp. ,  the leech, Holobdella stagnalis  and the
 amphipod,  Hyallela azteca  occurred most frequently.   The  relative percentages
 of the major  groups varied yearly at each  station.   While a change  in  group
 proportions coincided with the  1974  population dip, composition in  1976 and
 1977 tended to resemble that before 1974.

      Richness and  diversity  values (Table  14)  tend  to  be low for  1972  since
 oligochaetes were  not   identified to  species that year.  Mean  areal  richness
 decreased  at the peripheral stations  to a low in 1974 of  7 to 10 before  peak-
 ing in 1977 at over 14.   The lowest value for the center station, about 4, was
 reached in 1975.  By 1977 richness had  increased to the 1973 level of about 7.


                                        36

-------

-v 50,000-
CD
LU
g 40,000-
OJ






S 1
> 30,000-
Z
6
CE
fj
< 20,000-
5
u
-y-
i- 10,000-
•z.
LlJ
oa











•M








IQ7I

















1

















1

















Q

















73

















ill
j — . 	 	
1 IQ7"





1. 1 1C
















1
7d '


















IQ-

Center Station





i









III











M •









'K 1 IQ7K ' 1977
IM
^ 50,000-
co
UJ
CD 40,000-
LU
tr
LU
> 30,000-
z
0
cc
(J
< 20,000-
S
O
I
K 10,000-
z
UJ
m


Summer Home Station


























|





•••• 1

illfl ttn mTl III





_ m
'
nl
1971 ' 197? ' 1973 ' 1974 ' 1975 ' 1976 ' 1977

^£
v 50,000-

QJ
s
m 40,000-
UJ
t-
(T
UJ
> 30,000-
5
< 20,000-
5
O
H 10,000-
z:
UJ
m




Resort Station















ill















rTTTi _^u TTm
1971 ' 1972 ' 1973 ' 1974 ' 1975 ' 1976










1















1
1 1977














i
11
i 84.239i
C\J r
v 50,000-
w
UJ
5
CD 40,000-
UJ
t—
tr
UJ
> 30,000-
6
o:
< 20,000-
^
o
K 10,000-
UJ
m

















<.















|
111,255 J
^
Campground Station














\ ^" t™" "™" ""
•^t"* 111 If 1
hill rtn ,1. Ill 1 Hi 1
' 1971 ' 1972 ' 1973 ' 1974 ' 1975 ' 1976 ' 1977
Figure 10.   Mean number benthic macroinvertebrates per square meter (horizontal  bars indicate yearly means).

-------
              TABLE 12.   DIAMOND LAKE BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATES
Diptera
  Ablabesmyia mom'1 is (Linnaeus)1
  Chironomus decorus (= attenuatus of authors) group1
  Cladotanytarsus Kieffer1
  Cricotopus Wulp1
  Cryptotendipes amachaerus (Townes)2
  Dicrotendipes californicus Johannsen2
  Glyptotendipes Kieffer (prob. G. lobiferus (Say))1
  Pagastiella Brundin (prob. £. orophila (Edwards))1
  Palpoymia Megerle group
  Parachironomus abortivus (Mai loch) group2
  Procladius culicifornris (prob.  £.  sublettei Roback) group1
  Psectrocladius Kieffer*
  Tanytarsus Wulp

Oligochaeta
  Dero digitata (Muller)3
  Ilyodrilus tempietoni (Southern)3
  Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri spiral is Claparede3
  Lumbriculus Grube
  Naididae unidentified
  Nais simplex Piguet
  Pristina Ehrenberg
  Sty!aria lacustris (Linnaeus)

Amphipoda
  Crangonyx richmondensis occidental is Hubricht and Harrison4
  Myall el a azteca (Saussure)

Hirudinea
  Erpodellidae unidentified5
  Glossiphonia complanata (Linnaeus)
  Helobdella elongata (Castle)5
  Helobdella stagnalis (Linnaeus)

Pelecypoda
  Pisidium Pfeiffer

Gastropoda
  Menetus opercularis Gould6
  Physa Draparnaud
  Valvata humeral is Say6

Trichoptera
  Agray1ea Curtis
  Oecetis inconspicua (Walker)

                                             (Continued)


                                      38

-------
Table 12 (Cont.)
Ephemeroptera
  CaenIs  Stephens
  Callibaetis Eaton

Zygoptera
  Coenagrlon Kirby
  Ishnura Charpentier

Turbellaria

Hydracarina

Nematoda
1    Identified by J.E. Sublette, Eastern New Mexico Univ.
2    Identified by W. T. Mason, USEPA, Cincinnati
3    Identified by J.K. Hiltunen, USFWS
4    Identified by J.R. Holsinger, Old Dominion Univ.
5    Identified by D. J. Klemm, USEPA, Cincinnati
6    Identified by H. van der Schalie, Univ. Michigan
                                       39

-------
TABLE 13.   BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE SUMMARY,  19/1-1977
1971
GrouP Mean %
No./m2

Amphipoda
Chironomidae 9,453 64.80
Gastropoda 2 0.01
Hirudinea 3 0.02
Oligochaeta 5,012 34.40
Others 114 0.80
Total 14,584
Predom. species a,i

Amphipoda
Chironomidae
Gastropoda
Hirudinea
Oligochaeta
Others
Total
Predom. species
1972
Mean
No./m2

3
3,894

3
4,677
32
8,609
a

1,510
14,451
284
1,308
727
520
18,800
k
%


0.03
45.20

0.03
54.30
0.4

,b

8.00
76.90
1.50
6.90
3.90
2.80

.e,J
1973
Mean %
No./m2
CENTER STATION
35 0.50
4,741 66.70
134 1.90
194 2.70
1,705 24.00
299 4.20
7,108
b » i » 9
RESORT STATION
982 44.70
443 20.10
44 2.00
579 26.40
46 2.10
103 4.70
2,197
f.e.k
1974
Mean
No./m2

5
4,038
4
34
1,516
118
5,715
b,

494
84
90
173
1
78
918
f
%


0.09
70.60
0.07
0.60
26.50
2.10

i,g

53.80
9.10
9.80
18.80
0.10
8.50

,e,c
1975
Mean
No./m2

11
3,681
4
12
2,346
39
6,093


661
365
622
286
36
347
2,317

%


0.18
60.40
0.06
0.20
38.50
0.64

b.i.g

28.50
15.80
26.80
12.30
1.50
15.50

f.h.e.k
1976
Mean
No./m2

20
7,643
7
133
4,012
90
11,905
b

1,295
4,847
437
435
54
448
7,516
k
%


0.17
64.20
0.59
1.10
33.70
0.76

,i,g

17.20
64.40
5.80
5.80
0.70
6.00

,f
1977
Mean
No./m2

17
16,153
6
46
1 1 ,886
89
28,197


1,053
4,869
257
704
857
590
8,330

%


0.06
57.30
0.02
0.16
42.10
0.30

b,g

12.60
58.40
3.10
8.40
10.30
7.10

k.j.f.e
SUMMER HOMES STATION
Amphipoda
Chironomidae
Gastropoda
Hirudinea
Oligochaeta
Others
Total
Predom. species
615
14,064
103
1,981
1,580
46
18,389
k
3.30
76.50
0.60
10.80
8.60
0.20

,e
940 21.20
1,589 35,80
700 15.70
909 20.50
153 3.40
147 3.30
4,438
k.d.f.e.h
266
274
367
731
45
74
1,757
e
15.10
15.60
20.90
41.60
2.60
4.20

,h,f ,k
278
1,595
358
915
56
206
3,408

8.10
46.80
10.50
26.80
1.60
6.00

d,e,h,k
59
9,341
411
1,144
133
172
11,260
k
0.50
82.90
3.60
10.10
1.20
1.50

,e
617
4,939
1,074
821
169
380
8,000

7.70
61.70
13.40
10.30
2.10
4.70

k,d,e,h
(Continued)

-------
TABLE 13.   (Cont.)
1971
Group Mean %
No./m2

Amphipoda
Chironomidae
Gastropoda
Hirudinea
Oligochaeta
Others
Total
Predom. species
Predominant Species
a. Chironotnidae
b. Chironomus decorus
1972
Mean %
No./m2

1,336 2.80
41,096 85.90
351 0.70
3,814 8.00
1,136 2.40
97 0.20
47,830
k.e



1973
Mean %
No./m2
CAMPGROUND STATION
1,317 27.10
1,586 32.60
327 6.70
1,389 28.60
153 3.10
88 1 . 80
4,860
k.f.e



1974
Mean %
No./m2

897 44. 30
69 3.40
251 12.40
705 34.90
10 0.50
90 4.40
2,022
f,e,h



1975
Mean %
No./m2

631 14.50
2,190 50.60
418 9.60
890 20.50
74 1 . 70
125 2.90
4,328
k.e.f



1976
Mean %
No./m2

1,057 13.20
4,326 53.90
488 6.10
1,160 14.40
72 0.90
925 11.5
8,028
k.e.f



1977
Mean
No./m2

1,495
3,609
475
989
204
561
7,333




%


20.40
49.20
6.50
13.50
2.80
7.60

k.f.e



c. Crangonyx richmondensis occidentalis
d. Dicrotendipes californicus
e. Helobdella stagnalis
f. Hyallela azteca
g. Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri s|
h. Menetus opercularis
i. Oligochaeta
j. Pagastiella orophila
k. Tanytarsus



}iral is





















































-------
 TABLE 14.   BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE AREAL SPECIES RICHNESS (SAR),
            SHANNON-WEAVER DIVERSITY (H1)  AND COMPLEMENT OF SIMPSON'S
            INDEX (1-S)

1972*

SAR
H1
1-S

SAR
H1
1-S

SAR
H1
1-S

3.
0.
0.

10.
0.
0.

10.
0.
0.

051
057
046

822
595
587

810
518
540
1973

6.
0.
0.

9.
0.
0.

12.
0.
0.

806
424
495

356
640
646

598
711
692
1974
CENTER STATION
5.076
0.247
0.278
RESORT STATION
8.011
0.761
0.762
SUMMER HOME STATION
10.024
0.713
0.678
1975

4.
0.
0.

10.
0.
0.

10.
0.
0.

366
238
240

754
817
791

939
795
778
1976

5.
0.
0.

12.
0.
0.

11.
0.
0.

436
324
373

291
724
703

937
668
680
1977

7.
0.
0.

14.
0.
0.

14.
0.
0.

494
406
522

738
804
764

698
868
804
CAMPGROUND STATION
SAR
H1
1-S
11.
0.
0.
675
464
476
11.
0.
0.
013
552
574
7.577
0.550
0.621
9.
0.
0.
379
560
573
14.
0.
0.
264
813
762
14.
0.
0.
840
810
765
Oligochaetes not identified to species
                                 42

-------
     Shannon-Weaver diversity (H1)  and  the  complement of Simpson's index (1  -
S.I.) were similar both  in numerical  value at the  peripheral  stations  and  in
temporal  distribution at all four stations.   The  three peripheral  stations did
not show a decrease  in  diversity corresponding to the population  dip of 1974;
the center station, however, was lower in 1974 and 1975.  There seemed to be a
general  trend toward regaining or surpassing the  1973 levels for these indices
by 1977.   Values for the latter year ranged from  0.4 to 0.5 for the center and
0.7 to 0.8 for the other stations.

     The  1977 dendrogram (Figure 11) indicates two highly dissimilar groups  in
the  benthos  (Bray-Curtis coeffcient  of dissimilarity  >0.8).   The cluster  on
the  right  is composed  entirely of center station collections, and  the large
group on the  left  is composed  of  the other  stations with no clear pattern  of
sub-grouping.  Single dendrograms for the other years and a dendrogram utiliz-
ing  all  the  collections from 1972  through  1977  were all  very  similar  in ap-
pearance  to  Figure 11.   The 1972-77 dendrogram  indicates  a possible tendency
toward some seasonal  or yearly clustering.

     This study  has documented two aspects  of  the benthos  of Diamond Lake:
that  it  is very diverse and  that  populations in the deeper  part  of the lake
are  significantly  different from those  in the nearshore areas.  Effects  of the
diversion upon  the  benthic  community  are  conjectural.   However,  there are
indications that few significant changes have taken place during the course  of
this  investigation.   Had  there been  large  temporal   or  spatial  changes  in
population composition  or distribution,  the clustering  analyses  should have
shown a much  stronger tendency  for the collections to group into more discrete
clusters.  Predominant  species  were  little  changed at each  station through
time.  While there  were  some  temporal fluctuations  in  percentage species
composition,  perhaps due partly to predator-prey relationships coincident with
the  1974 population  dip  (as  indicated  by  changes  in  the  chironomid-leech
populations), composition  in 1976  and   1977  was similar  to  pre-1974 levels.
Areal species richness declined with the population dip but was little changed
from  previous  levels  at  the  end  of the study.   There  were  few changes  in
species diversity,  although yearly  averages suggested an upward trend.

     The  amount of  food  available for  benthic  macroinvertebrate populations
from  settled material  would naturally be expected  to be influenced  by the
phytoplankton.  The  coincident decrease in  benthos  and phytoplankton in 1973
and  1974  in  Diamond  Lake may  thus  be  related.  The decrease in benthic popula-
tions in  the mid-part of this  study may also be part of larger or longer term
cyclic processes not evident by  the extent of our  investigation.
                                      43

-------
1.0-

 Q —


 .8-
co .4-
co
0 .3-

   .2-
           I
           2
           3
           4
Center Stn.
Resort Stn.
Summer Home Stn,
Campground Stn.
                               .                      R
        CVj^C\jC\jC\jC\jC\j  CVjCVj^CVjCXjCVi CSjfOCXjt^r^^CVjOgCViCXj.^frjCVjCVjOg
        x\\\\\\  \\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\x
         i  i   i  i   i  i  i
        ^T to  ro ro ro  ro 
-------
                   MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS OF THIS RESEARCH

     Meyerhoff (1977) found indications of recently accelerated eutrophication
in  sediment  cores  from  Diamond  Lake.   He attributed  this  acceleration  to
increased  human  activity  in the  watershed which he  assumed to  begin about
1930.   One  of the  projected benefits  of the  waste  diversion system  was  to
ameliorate the impact of this still burgeoning activity.  Reducing the nutri-
ent  load  was expected  to result  in an improved trophic state or at least a
reduced rate  of  eutrophication.   Based on flushing rate  and an approximation
of  the sedimentation  rate (Dillon  and Rigler,  1975)  Diamond Lake  could  be
expected  to  respond  to  the  reduced loading after approximately  1-1.7 years.
The diversion was  completed  in December, 1975.  Therefore, some change should
have been detectable in 1977, provided that the nutrient load had been altered
sufficiently.  Calculations  have shown that the  probable  maximum  load reduc-
tion was  only  10-15%.   This  would probably not noticeably  affect  the trophic
status  of the lake.   Fluctuations in natural  loading  and  unpredictable sedi-
ment contributions  could compensate for the reduction  and  continued leaching
of residual  nutrients  from sanitary drain fields could effectively reduce the
percentage diversion and delay lake response.

     Our  data suggest  a relatively small cultural impact,  even  during recent
years  when  visitor use  approached two  orders  of magnitude  higher than that
reported  in  1924.  Diamond Lake  appears to be  quite productive as a result of
nutrient  loading from natural sources.  While the tributaries may occasionally
receive nutrients from human activities the impact seems  to be minimal.

     A  major management  concern is whether the lake can withstand additional
development without  suffering accelerated  eutrophication.   Dillon and Rigler
(1975) developed an  approach  to making such a  decision based on relationships
between nutrient loading and water quality characteristics.  With a preconcep-
tion of the  desired  trophic  state,  in  terms  of water clarity and the type of
recreation  to  be  promoted,  a  manager  can  use  their  system to  estimate  an
acceptable nutrient  load.  Methods  for identifying the natural and artificial
components of  the  existing  load are  described which allow  calculation of a
permissible  increase  (or a necessary  decrease).  The  step-by-step system has
been applied  to Diamond  Lake (Table  15).   Measurements from  our seven-year
study  were  used  instead  of  certain generalizations in  the  Dillon and Rigler
system.

     Dillon and Rigler describe four classes of lakes based on maximum permis-
sible  summer average  Chi  a level.  With respect to the cold water fishery and
the high mean transparency, Diamond  Lake fits the Level 1 category (cold water
fishery,  mean Secchi  disc ^5 m).  However, the lake  does  not conform to per-
missible  Chi a and  the corresponding spring TP for this level (Tables 9, 15).
The permissible  P  for Level  1 would be about  1800 kg/yr (Table 15).  With the
exception of  1974  the nutrient budget  shows that the  P from Silent and Short

                                      45

-------
           TABLE 15:  ACCEPTABLE P LOAD AND CAPACITY FOR DEVELOPMENT
                      ACCORDING TO DILLON AND RIGLER (1975)
Step 1:   Choose Maximum Permissible Summer Average Chi a

     Level 1:  2 mg Chi a/m3; promoting body contact water recreation
               cold water fishery desirable; high mean Secchi disc
               transparency (> 5 m).

     Level 2:  5 mg Chi a/m3; general water recreation; cold water
               fishery not imperative; mean Secchi disc transparency
               2-5 m.

     Level 3:  10 mg Chi a/m3; body contact recreation not important;
               emphasis on fishery (bass, bluegill); danger of fish
               kill in winter due to oxygen depletion; Secchi disc
               transparency 1-2 m.

     Level 4:  25 mg Chi a/m3; suitable only for warmwater fishery;
               considerable danger of fish kill; Secchi disc trans-
               parency < 1.5m.

Step 2:   Calculate Permissible Spring Phosphorus Concentration

                    Iog10 [P] = Oog10 [Chi a] + 1.14)/1.45

     Level 1:  9.9 mg P/m3
           2:  18.5 mg P/m3
           3:  29.9 mg P/m3
           4:  56.3 mg P/m3

Step 3:   Determine Lake Surface Area (A  in m2), mean depth (z in m)
         and Volume (V in m3).

          A  = 1.243 x 107 m2
           o
          z  = 7.2 m

          V  = 9.02 x 107 m3

Step 4:   Determine Area of Watershed (Ad in m2)

          A. = 1.42 x 108 m2 - 1.24 x 107 m2
           a = 1.296 x 108 m2

Step 5:   Determine total annual runoff for watershed (m3/yr/m2)

         Unnecessary for Diamond Lake

                                                  (Continued)
                                      46

-------
TABLE 15.   (Cont.)
Step 6:   Determine total outflow volume Q (m3/yr)
          Measured avg.  1972-1977 = 6.14 x 107 m3/yr
         and Flushing Rate p = Q/V (yr-1)
          (6.14 x 107 m3/yr)/(9.02 x 107 m3) = 0.68/yr

Step 7:   Calculate the Areal Water Load, q  (m/yr)

               qs = Q/AQ
                  = (6.14 x 107 m3/yr)/1.243 x 107 m2

                  =4.94 m/yr

Step 8:   Calculate the Retention Coefficient (R)

               R = 0.426 exp (-0.271 qg) + 0.574 exp (-0.00949 qg)

                 = 0.6594

Step 9:   Calculate the Response Time to a Change in Loading

               Response Time =(3^5) 0.69/(p + 10/z)
                             = 1.0 -> 1.7 yr

Step 10:  Calculate the Permissible Phosphorus load, L   m (mg/m2/yr).


               Lpem, =  (CP]  • l  ' P)/(1-R)
     Level  1:        =  (9.9 x 7.2 x 0.68)/(l-.6594) = 142.3  mg/m2/yr
     Level  2:        =  (18.5 x 7.2 x 0.68)/(1-.6594) =  265.9
     Level  3:        =  (29.9 x 7.2 x 0.68)/(l-.6594) =  429.8
     Level  4:        =  (56.3 x 7.2 x 0.68)/(l-.6594) -  809.3

     and the  Permissible  Supply, Jperm (kg/yr)

               J     =  (L     .A  )/106
                perm    v  perm    o

     Level  1:        =1767  kg/yr
     Level  2:        =  3305
     Level  3:        =  5342
     Level  4:        =  10,060

 Step 11:  Determine  the Phosphorus  Supply from the Land

          (from  nutrient budget,  Silent Cr.,  Short Cr.  and Intermittent Str.)

               JE =  2164 kg/yr     ____	

                                                        (Continued)

                                       47

-------
TABLE 15.  (Cont.)
          and the Load

               LE= JE/Ao=24.0

          (Groundwater contributed approximately 266 kg/yr in addition
           to the above)

Step 12:  Determine the Phosphorus Supply from Precipitation (from
          nutrient budget)

               JpR = 114 kg/yr

Step 13:  If the Natural Supply, J , is greater than or equal to the
          Permissible Supply, J   n, allow no further development.

               JM = ^c + JDD (+ Groundwater Supply)
                ii    t    r K
                  = (2164 + 114 + 266) kg/yr

                  = 2544 kg/yr
          (Greater than Level 1 but less than Level 2)

Step 14:  Determine the Present Number of Cottages, N , and Permanent
          Dwellings, NQ.

               N  = 102 Recreation Residences (Cottages)
               ND = 0 (all facilities on east shore are on interceptor line)

          and calculate the number of capita years per year at the lake, Npy.

               Average (1969-77) Visitor Days to Summer Homes

                    = 29,200/yr (12 hr days)
               NpY  = 54 ca. yrs/yr

Step 15:  Calculate the Phosphorus Supplied to the lake from the Cottage
          Units (Artificial Supply, J.).

               J  = (0.8 kg/ca.yr) (Ncy)
                  = 43 kg/yr

Step 15:  Calculate the Present Total Supply of Phosphorus, JT.
                  = 2544 kg/yr + 43 kg/yr
                  = 2587 kg/yr
          (Still less than J erm = 3305 kg/yr)

                                                       (Continued)

                                      48

-------
TABLE 15.   (Cont.)
Step 17:   Calculate the Total  Permissible Number of Cottages,  N    m

               V™ = (Jpe™ - JN)/0.53x0.8
                     = 1795 (for level 2)

Step 18:   Calculate the Additional Number of Cottages, N . .


               Nadd = Nperm " Nc
                    = 1693 (for level 2)
                                      49

-------
Creeks  exceeds  this  allowable  limit.   The yearly  supply from  all  measured
natural sources averaged  over  2500 kg indicates that  Level  1  cannot be main-
tained.  It  should  be noted that the transparency  sometimes  remained greater
than 5 m even during rather heavy blue-green algal  blooms as a result of algal
clumping.   Also,  the  cold water  fishery  is  supplemented  through  intensive
management by the  DFW.   Provision  for such an intensive management program is
not made by Dillon and Rigler.

     Level 2 is described as  having  maximum  summer average Chi  a of 5 mg/m3
and an average  Secchi disc transparency of  2-5 m.  A cold water fishery is not
characteristic  of  a Level  2 lake  (Table  15).  Diamond  Lake still exceeds the
desired Chi  a  average.   The average summer (June-Sept.) values over the study
period  were  between  5  and  10  mg/m3,  corresponding  to Level 3.   It seems,
however,  that, the  most desirable  status  consistent  with recreational demands
is  Level  2.   The  present  degree of productivity  is  essential  in maintaining
the  large population  of  rapidly  growing trout.  Substantially  reducing the
primary productivity  would probably  adversely affect  the  fishery and reduce
the attraction  of  the lake.   Allowing the  lake to assume Level 3 status would
be  even less desirable because the greater productivity would probably result
in  seasonal  fish   kills  due  to low  DO  and  an  increase in  blue-green algal
blooms.

     Vollenweider  (1976)  suggested from  data gathered  from a large number and
variety of lakes  that the "loading tolerance" of  a lake can be  determined if
the hydraulic  load (total  yearly water discharge  divided  by the lake surface
area)  and the  mean  depth are  known.   Using  his  relationship  the critical
loading for  Diamond Lake is calculated to be approximately  1350 kg P/yr (Table
16).  At  this  rate the lake could probably maintain oligotrophic characteris-
tics.  Loading  in  excess of about twice  this  amount would result in a eutro-
phic  system.  This  is more restrictive than the Dillon  and  Rigler projections,
suggesting that the trophic status of Diamond Lake might be even more vulner-
able.

      TABLE  16:  CRITICAL  PHOSPHORUS  LOAD ACCORDING TO  VOLLENWEIDER  (1975)


           Lr (mgP/m2/yr) =  10  (z Q/V)(1 +  V~V70~)
           c                     y             y
                L  = critical loading  level  in  P controlled  lake

                z  = mean depth  (Diamond Lake  [DL] =  7.2 m)

                Q  = yearly outflow (DL =  6.145 x 107 m3)

                V  = Volume of  lake  (DL =  9.02  x  107  m3)

                L  = 108.5  mg P/m2/yr
                c = 1349  kg P/yr (for Diamond  Lake)

      Bortleson  et  aj. (1974) developed a  system for rating the trophic condi-
 tion  and  the potential  for eutrophication  of  lakes  and  reservoirs in the  State
 of Washington,  taking into account various physical  and water  quality charac-
 teristics and  cultural   influences.  Table  17  shows  that with  this  system,

                                      50

-------
TABLE 17.  RATING OF FACTORS AFFECTING PRESENT AND POTENTIAL TROPHIC STATUS
           ACCORDING TO BORTLESON (1974)
Physical Factors Value
Mean depth (m) 7.2
Water volume 90.2
(hm3)
Bottom slope (%) 0.36
Shoreline 1.19
Configuration
Ratio of drainage 1.57
area to lake
volume (mVm3)
Altitude (m) 1580
Water renewal 1 . 37
time (yrs)



Rating Notes Cultural Factors Value
3 Point Sources of 0
Domestic Sewage
1 Nonpoint Sources 200
(kg TP per Km2 of
lake per year)
5 Volume of water 0.88
per nearshore
home (hm3)
2 % nearshore land 21
developed for
residential use
3
1
3 includes
ground-
water



Rating Notes Water Quality Value
Factors
1 TP upper water 38
(pg/1)
2 from nu- TP ratio, bottom 2.6
trient to upper water
budget
2 not full TIN upper water 38
year resi- (ug/1)
dences
3 not full TIN ratio, bottom 3.1
year resi- to upper water
dences
Organic N, upper 345
water (ug/1)
Specific Conduc- 25-30
tance (umhos at
25°C)
Secchi disc (m) 6. 1
DO near bottom 3.6
(mg/1)
Water temperature 12.6
near bottom (°C)
X lake surface in 1-10
emergent, rooted
aquatic plants
X shoreline in < 10
emergent, rooted
aquatic plants
Rati ng Notes
5 0-10 m; not
vol. wtd;
'71-77 avg.
3
1 0-10 m; not
vol. wtd7^"71-77
avg excl. 8/14/73,
5m, 697 ug/1
4
3 0-10 m; not vol.
wtd; '71-77 avg.
2
2 '71-77 avg.
3 13 m; 6/15-9/15;
'72-77 avg.
4 13 m; 6/15-9/15;
'72-77 avg.
2 estimate
1 estimate

-------
Diamond  Lake  is  of an  intermediate  trophic  status.   Barring  a  substantial
change in cultural  influence the lake should remain stable.

     The three evaluations  have  important management implications.  The natu-
ral nutrient  loading precludes  an  oligotrophic system.  It  is  unlikely that
oligotrophy would  be  the management  objective but minimizing the  cultural
influence would  help maintain the lake's  present status.   This  would include
control  of  land disturbance  and soil  erosion.  Pearl and  Goldman (1972)  and
Goldman  (1974)  have demonstrated that trophic status can  be  affected  by  in-
creased  erosion  and siltation.  Terrestrial  wildlife,  human  health  and aes-
thetics should also be considered.

     As  part  of a  lake  management  plan it is  extremely  important that water
quality/nutrient supply  relationships  be  defined.   A nutrient budget with  its
concomitant hydrologic  information  is  vital  to this  understanding.   "Point"
sources  of  nutrients need  to be quantified to assess  artificial  or cultural
impact.  An acceptable  nutrient supply  could  be estimated if,  additionally,
the lake surface area and volume are  known.

     Nutrient loading from  non-point  sources  can be estimated if funds and/or
time  limitations  prevent actual  field  measurements.   Land  use  type/stream
nutrient concentration regressions (Omernik, 1977) together with flow data can
provide  an estimate  of loading from a watershed.  These flow data are reported
annually  in  the USGS Water  Resources Data publication  for each state.  Flow
data from a specific stream  not included  in  the  report could be extrapolated
from another  gaged  stream  if watersheds  are  similar and  drainage areas  are
known.    For most accurate  extrapolation,  one  should consider proximity, alti-
tude and exposure  (N,  S,  E, W).   Rainfall  isolines (NOAA,  1974) would help
identify a proper watershed for extrapolation purposes.

     Table  18 illustrates  the  use  of estimations  rather than actual field
values when applying the Dillon and Rigler and Vollenweider critical  loading
calculations  to  Diamond  Lake.  Only two field measurements were used, maximum
depth  and the number of  summer homes.  These calculations indicate that for an
oligotrophic  system  loadings  of 2825 kg  P/yr  (Dillon  and Rigler)  and 2382 kg
P/yr  (Vollenweider) are  acceptable.   However,  calculations  based  on  actual
measurements  (Tables 15  and  16) indicate  that these numbers are far too high.
The factor  most responsible  for this discrepancy is the outflow  volume (Q).
The estimate  used in Table  18  is  over twice the measured  flow which doubles
the calculated  flushing rate,  thereby increasing the  "permissible" nutrient
supply.  The value  of precise  field measurements is evident.
                                       52

-------
          TABLE 18.   DETERMINING ACCEPTABLE P LOAD WITH A  MINIMUM  OF
                     FIELD MEASUREMENTS
                               Dillon and Rigler

Step 1:   See Table 15

Step 2:   See Table 15

Step 3:   A  = 1.216 x 107 m2 (from USGS, 1:62,500, Diamond Lake,  Oreg. ,  1956)
         V  = 1/2 A  x Z _ (H.  Mercier, personal comm.  10/27/78)
                   0    max
            = 8.69 x 107 m3 (Z    obtained by measurement)
                              max
          Equation assumes the cross-sectional area to be a linear function
          of depth.  It appears to work well for basins with a regular shape.
          A contour map should be made for irregular basins.
         Z  =
            = 7.1 m

Step 4:  A. = 1.447 x 108 m2 - 1.216 x 107 m2 = 1 . 325 x 108 m2 (from USGS,
          T: 62, 500, Diamond Lake, Oregon, 1956)

Step 5:  r = 4.409 x 108 m3/440 km2 •  yr
           = 1.00 mVm2 yr (USGS, 1971-77, North Umpqua River below Lemolo
                            Lake, average discharge, cal.  years 1970-76)

          The drainage area for this gage is on the same rainfall isoline
          as Diamond Lake and actually includes the Diamond Lake watershed.

Step 6:  Q = A .  • r
           = (T.325 x 108 m2) (1.00 m3/m2 yr)
           = 1.325 x 108 mVyr
         p = Q/V
           = (1.325 x 108 m3/yr)/(8.69 x  107 m3)
           =1.52 yr-1
Step 7:  q  =
          s = (l.§25 x 108 m3/yr)/(1.216 x 107 m2)
            = 10.90 m/yr

Step 8:  R = 0.426 exp (-0.271 q  ) + 0.574 exp (-0.00949 q )
           = 0.540

Step 9:  Response Time =(3^5)  0.69/(p + 10/z)
                       = 0.7 -> 1.2 yr

                                                        (Continued)


                                      53

-------
TABLE 18.  (Cont.)
Step 10:  L     = ([P] • z - p)/(l-R)
     Level 1:  232.3
     Level 2:  434.0
     Level 3:  701.5
     Level 4: 1320.8

          J     = (L     -A )/106
           perm   ^ perm    cr

     Level 1:  2825 kg
     Level 2:  5277
     Level 3:  8530
     Level 4:  16,061

Step 11:  (from Omernik, 1977, p. 55)

     No Agriculture
     "» 5% urban area in intermittent stream watersheds (4.350 x 107 m2)

          [P] = 0.032 mg/1
           E! = (0.032 mg/l)(1000 l/m2/yr) = 32.0 mg/m2/yr

     No urban area in remainder of watersheds (8.900 x 107 m2)

          [P] = 0.028 mg/1
          E2 = 28.0 mg/m2/yr
                     M]> + (Ad2>
             = 1.392 x 109 mg/yr + 2.492 x 109 mg/yr

             = 3884 kg/yr


          LE = JE/Ao
             = 319.4 mg/m2/yr

Step 12:  5 ug TP/1 in precipitation at Waldo Lake, OR (Malueg et al_. , 1972)
          Average Annual Precipitation near Diamond Lake
             •v 24 inches/yr (NOAA, 1974)

               J   = (0.61 m/yr)(A  = 1.243 x 107m2)(5 mg/m3)
                PK * 38 Kg/yr

Step 13:  JN = JE + JpR

             = 3922 kg/yr


          LN = LE + LPR
             = 322.5 mg/m2 yr

                                      CA                (Continued)

-------
TABLE 18.   (Cont.)
Step 14:   N  = 102
          N   = (0.69)(102)

           LY = 70
Step 15:  J. = (0.8) NpY

           M = 56 kg/yF



Step 16:  JT = JN + JA


             = 3978 kg/yr
                = 2455 (for level 2)



 Step  18:  Nadd = Nperm - NC
               = 2353 (for level 2)







                                 Vollenweider





           \_  =  10  (z Q  /V)(l  +
           c          y            j



             =  10  (7.1)(1.325 x 108)(1 + V8.69 x 10V1.325 x 10° )/(8.69 x 107)


             =  195.9 mgP/m2/yr


             =  2382 kg  P/yr  (for Diamond Lake)
                                       55

-------
                                  REFERENCES

Adams, C.F.  1975.  Nutritive  value  of American foods in common units.  Agri-
     cultural Handbook #456,  Agricultural  Research Series, U.S. Department of
     Agriculture, 291  p.

American Public  Health  Association.   1971.   Standard methods for the examina-
     tion of water and wastewater.  13th Ed.  874 p.

Bauer, J.A.   1976.  Diamond  Lake  range management.  Oregon  Wildlife 31(11):
     3-5.

Boesch,  D.F.  1977.  Application  of  numerical classification in ecological
     investigations of water  pollution.  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.
     Ecol. Res.  Ser.  EPA-600/3-77-033.

Bortleson, G.C.,  N.P.  Dion and J.B. McConnel.   1974.  A  method for the rela-
     tive  classification  of lakes  in  the State of Washington  from reconnais-
     sance   data.   U.S.  Geological  Survey,  Water  Resources  Investigations
     37-74,  38 p.

Burgess,  F.J.   1966.  An  evaluation  of waste  collection and treatment  needs at
     Diamond Lake, Oregon.  Consultant  Report  to U.S. Forest Service, 18 p.

Cleator,  F.W.   1924.  Report  on Diamond Lake  recreation  unit,  Umpqua  National
     Forest.  Cleator and Johnson's Recreation Surveys, 5 p.

DeMarte,  J.A.  and R.T.  Hartman. 1974.  Studies on absorption of 32P,  59Fe and
     45Ca  by water  milfoil (Myriophyllum  exalbescens  Fernald).   Ecology 55:
      188-194.
 Dillon,  P.J.  and F.H.  Rigler.   1975.   A simple  method
      capacity of  a   lake  for  development  based on  lake
      Fish.  Res. Bd. of Canada 32(9):1519-1531.
 for  predicting  the
trophic  status.   J.
 Goldman,  C.R.,  E. Steemann  Nielson,  R.A.  Vollenweider and R.G. Wetzel.   1971.
      The  14C light and dark bottle technique,  p.  70-73.   In R.A.  Vollenweider
      (ed  )  A manual  on methods  for measuring  primary  production  in  aquatic
      environments.   IBP  Handbook No.  12,  Blackwell  Scientific  Publications,
      Oxford (G.B.).

              1974.  Eutrophication  of Lake  Tahoe emphasizing water  quality.
      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Ecol. Res.  Ser. EPA-660/3-74-034.

 Greene,  J.C.,  W.E.  Miller, T.  Shiroyama, R.A. Soltero  and K. Putnam.   1976.
      Use of  laboratory cultures of  Selenastrum, Anabaena  and the indigenous

                                        56

-------
     isolate Sphaerocystls  to predict  effects of  nutrient  and zinc interac-
     tions  upon  phytoplankton  growth  in  Long Lake, Washington.   Mitt.  Int.
     Ver.  Limnol.  21:372-384.

Hughes, D.R.  1970.  Lake Creek  water quality monitoring station,  a progress
     report. US Forest Service, Umpqua National Forest,  13 p.

Hurlbert,  S.H.  1971.   The nonconcept  of species  diversity:   A critique and
     alternative parameters.  Ecology 52:577-586.

Hutchinson,  G.E.   1957.  A  treatise on limnology.  Vo.  1.  Geography, physics
     and chemistry.  John Wiley and Sons, Inc.  NY.  1015 p.

Larsen, D.P., D.W.  Schults  and  K.W.  Malueg.   1978.  Summer internal phosphorus
     supplies in  Shagawa  Lake,  Minnesota.  U.S.  Environmental  Protecton Agen-
     cy.  Manuscript.

Locke,  F.E.   1947.  A preliminary  report on  the Diamond Lake  study.  Oregon
     State Game Commission,  21 p.

Lund,  J.W.G.,  C.   Kipling  and  E.D.  LeCren.    1958.  The  inverted microscope
     method of  estimating  algal  numbers  and  the  statistical basis of estima-
     tions by counting.  Hydrobiologia 11:143-170.

Malueg, K.W., J.R. Tilstra, D.W.  Schults andC.F. Powers.   1972.   Limnological
     observations  on an ultraoligotrophic lake in Oregon,  U.S.A.   Verh. Inter-
     nat. Verein.  Limnol.,  18:292-302.

McHugh, R.A.  1972.  An  interim study  of  some physical, chemical  and biologi-
     cal  properties of selected  Oregon Lakes.  Oregon Department  of Environ-
     mental Quality, p.  62-66.

Mclntosh,  R.P.    1967.   An  index of  diversity  and  the  relation of certain
     concepts to diversity.  Ecology 48:392-404.

McRoy,  C.P.,  R.I.  Barsdate and  M.  Nebert.    1972.    Phosphorus cycling  in  an
     eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) ecosystem.   Limnol. & Ocean., 17(l):58-67.

Meyerhoff,  R.D.   1977.   Sediment  characteristics  and the  trophic  status  of
     four Oregon  lakes.   M.S. Thesis,  Oregon  State University, Corvallis,  OR,
     74 p.

Miller,  W.E.,  T.E.  Maloney and  J.C. Greene.  1974.  Algal  productivity  in  49
     lake waters as determined by algal assays.  Water Res.  8:667-679.

	, j.c.  Greene and T.  Shiroyama.  1976.  Application of algal assays
     to define  the effects  of wastewater effluents  upon algal  growth in multi-
     ple  use river systems.   In  E.J.  Middlebrooks, D.A. Falkenborg and T.E.
     Maloney  (eds.), Biostimulation and  nutrient  assessment.   Ann Arbor Sci-
     ence,  p 77-92.
                                       57

-------
National  Oceanic  and Atmospheric  Administration.   1974.   Climates  of  the
     States.  Vol.  I & II, U.S. Dept. Commerce.

Omernik, J.M.  1977.  Nonpoint  source-stream nutrient level  relationships:  A
     nationwide  study.  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.  Ecol.  Res.  Ser.
     EPA-600/3-77-105.  151  p.

Oregon  State  Game   Commission.   1947-1977.   Diamond  Lake  investigations.
     Annual reports.

Pearl,  H.W.  and C.R. Goldman.   1972.   Stimulation  of heterotrophic  and auto-
     trophic  activities  of  a planktonic microbial  community by siltation  at
     Lake Tahoe,  California.  Mem. 1st. Ital.  Idrobiol.  29 Suppl.:129-147.

Purdom, B.   1964.  The geologic history of the  Diamond  Lake area.   U.S.  Forest
     Service and Douglas  County parks  Dept.  39 p.

Pielou, E.C.   1970.   An  introduction  to mathematical ecology.   Wiley - Inter-
     science, New York, NY,  286 p.

Robertshaw,  N.F.  and L.M.   Thorpe.  1965.  Diamond  Lake  recreation  area plan--
     Umpqua National Forest.  U.S. Forest Service.

Sanville,  W.D.  and C.F.  Powers.  1971.  Diamond  Lake  studies--1971.   Progress
     report  No.  1.  Working Paper No.  8, U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency.
     22 p.

Schindler,  D.W., H. Kling,  R.V.  Schmidt, J.  Prokopowich, V.E.  Frost,  R.A.  Reid
     and  M.  Capel.  1973.   Eutrophication of lake 227  by addition of  phosphate
     and  nitrate:   The  second, third  and  fourth  years  of  enrichment,  1970,
     1971 and 1972.  J. Fish.  Res. Bd.  Canada 30(10):1415-1440.

Shiroyama, T.  Unpublished algal assay data from Diamond Lake, Oregon.

Simpson, E.H.  1949.   Measurement of diversity.  Nature 163:68.

Strickland,  J.D.H. and  T.R. Parsons.   1965.   A manual of  seawater  analysis.
     Bull.  Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, 125  p.

Swartz,  R.C.  1978.  Techniques  for  sampling and  analyzing  the marine macro-
     benthos.  U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency.  Ecol.  Res. Ser. EPA-600/
     3-78-030.   26 p.

U.S.   Forest Service.   1970.   Diamond  Lake  recreation  management  composite
     plan.

U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency.   1971.  Methods for chemical analysis of
      water  and  wastes.   Water  Quality Office.   Analytical Quality Control
      Laboratory, Cincinnati, OH.  312 p.

 U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency.   1973.   Biological  field and  laboratory
      methods  for  measuring  the  quality  of  surface  waters  and  effluents.


                                       58

-------
     Weber, C.I.  (ed.), U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency,  Environ.  Mon.
     Ser.   EPA-670/4-73-001,  180 p.

U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency.   1978.   Report on Diamond Lake, Douglas
     County, OR, EPA Region X.  Working Paper No. 828, 21 p.

Vollenweider,  R.A.   1976.   Advances  in  defining critical  loading levels for
     phosphorus in lake eutrophication.  Mem. 1st. Ital.  Idrobiol.   33:53-83.
                                       59

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the rt verse before co;np!<: ling)
  REPORT NO.
  EPA-600/8-79-017a
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
                                                           5. REPORT DAT.r;
  The Effects of Decreased Nutrient Loading on the
  Limnology of Diamond  Lake,  Oregon
              June  1979 issuing date
             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
  W.L. Lauer, G.S. Schuytema,  W.D. Sanville
  F.S. Stay, C.F. Powers
 PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  Environmental Research  Laboratory—Corvallis, OR
  Office of Research and  Development
  Environmental Protection Agency
  Corvallis, OR  97330
                                                           10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
             11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  same
                                                           13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                                                             final  -  inhouse 1971-1977
                                                           14 SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
                                                             EPA/600/02
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
  An Appendix report  (EPA-600/8-79-017b) is available from the  National  Technical
  Information Service,  Springfield, VA  22161
16. ABSTRACT
  Responding to accelerated  recreational pressure at Diamond  Lake,  Oregon, in 1969 the
  U.S.  Forest Service began  installation of a wastewater diversion  system which would
  eventually carry 85 to 90% of the sewage out of the watershed.   From 1971 through
  1977  the U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency conducted a program of research on the
  lake  to determine its trophic status and identify changes that  might be the result of
  the diversion.
  The lake is quite productive as  the result of natural loading from tributaries,
  groundwater and bottom sediments.  Cultural influence, initially  speculated to be
  significant was discovered to have a relatively minor impact on the lake.  Total
  phosphorus and chlorphyll  a_ levels reached a low in 1973, but by  1977 had increased
  to levels comparable to  1971.  Species composition of the benthic macroinvertebrate
  population was the same  in 1976/1977 as it was at the beginning of the study.
  Recommendations include  an adaptation of the Dillon and Rigler  system for determining
  the development capacity of lakes.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                           c. COSATI 1-icld/Group
  limnology
  lakes
  water pollution
  hydrology
  wastewater diversion
  phosphorus
  chlorophyll a_
  nutrient loading
  eutrophication
08/H
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
   Release  to  public
                                              19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)

                                                 unclassi ned
                           21. NO. OF PAGES
                             68
20. SECURITY CLASS I This page j
   unclassified
                                                                         22. PRICE
 EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77)   PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE
                                             60
                                                                                  irGPO 699-32!

-------