EPA/600/4-91/011
                                      April 1991
MOLECULAR OPTICAL SPECTROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES
     FOR HAZARDOUS WASTE SITE SCREENING
                         by

                   DeLyle Eastwood
       Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Company
                 Las  Vegas,  NV 89119

               Contract  No.  68-03-3249
                    Tuan  Vo-Dinh
             Oak Ridge National Laboratory
                 Oak Ridge,  TN 37831

               IAG   No.  DW-89933900-0
                   Project Officer

                William H. Engelmann
         Advanced Monitoring  Systems Division
      Environmental  Monitoring  Systems  Laboratory
              Las  Vegas,  NV  89193-3478
   ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SYSTEMS LABORATORY
         OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
        U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           LAS  VEGAS, NEVADA 89193-3478

-------
                                    NOTICE
     The information in this document has been funded wholly or in part by the
U. s. Environmental Protection Agency under contract No. 68-CO-0049 to
Lockheed Engineering and Sciences Company and under interagency Agreement No.
DW 8893 3900-01 to the U. S. Department of Energy (Oak Ridge National
Laboratory).  It has been subjected to the Agency's peer and administrative
review, and it has been approved for publication as an EPA document.  Mention
of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
                                       ii

-------
                                    ABSTRACT
     The U.S. Environmental  Protection Agency is interested in field screening
hazardous waste sites for pollutants  in  surface water, ground water and soil.
This report is an initial technical overview of the principal molecular
spectroscopic techniques and instrumentation and their possible field-
screening applications at hazardous waste sites.  The goal of this overview is
to describe the power and utility of  molecular spectroscopic techniques for
hazardous waste site screening  and to define the main strengths, weaknesses
and applications of each major  spectroscopic technique.  These spectroscopic
methods include electronic (ultraviolet-visible absorption and luminescence)
and vibrational (infrared absorption  and Raman scattering) techniques.  A
brief discussion is also given  for some  other techniques that rely on
spectroscopic detection (colorimetry  and fluorometry as well as immunoassay
and fiber-optic chemical sensors).  Hyphenated techniques such as high-
performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography - Fourier transform
infrared spectroscopy are discussed for  applications where the simultaneous
detection of the whole spectrum, rather  than single wavelength detection,  is
involved.

     The report is organized as follows: The Introduction (Section 1)  is
followed by a general Conclusions section (Section 2)  that surveys in  tabular
form the applicability of each  spectroscopic technique for field and
laboratory use, together with classes of pollutants measured,  advantages,
limitations, sensitivity, and current field applicability.  The cost of
instrumentation and analysis and the  time needed for analysis are briefly
addressed, and broad guidelines are given for three categories of
                                      iii

-------
instrumentation, portable, field deployable and semi-field deployable.
sections 3 through 8 discuss the specific spectroscopic areas in more detail.
Each section presents a brief outline of the spectroscopic principles and
instrumentation for the particular spectroscopic technique and describes the
state-of-the-art approach.  Advantages, limitations, sensitivities and
examples of specific techniques and their applications to environmental
pollutants are also discussed.  Conclusions are given for each spectroscopic
technique at the end of each section.  The reference section (Section 9),
contains all references cited, as well as a cross section of the definitive
literature.  This bibliography is intended to give the reader an introductory
background for general principles and field applications of molecular
spectroscopic techniques.  The Appendix consists of a set of figures that
address some of the major  spectroscopic methods, including luminescence
techniques such as fluorescence emission, synchronous fluorescence, room
temperature phosphorescence, infrared methods, and surface-enhanced Raman
spectroscopy.
                                       iv

-------
                                    TABLES

Number                                                                   Pacte

  1            Characteristics of spectroscopic                            8
               Techniques  for Field Analysis

-------
                       LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND SYMBOLS
ABBREVIATIONS
ASTM

CCD
CARS
EPA
FIA
FOCS
FTIR
GC
GC-MS
HPLC
IR
K
LC
LC-SLM
LESC-LV

LT
NRS
ppb/ppm
PAH
PBB
PCB
RIA
RR
SERS
SFC
SNR
SL
SPR
TIR
TLC
UV-VIS
American Society for Testing and
Materials
Charge-Coupled Device
Coherent Anti-stokes Raman spectroscopy
(U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency
Fluoroimmunoas s ay
Fiber-optic Chemical Sensors
Fourier Transform-Infrared spectroscopy
Gas Chromatography
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
High Performance Liquid Chromatography
Infrared Spectroscopy
Degrees Kelvin
Liquid Chromatography
Liquid Crystal Spatial Light Modulator
Lockheed Engineering & Sciences Company
- Las Vegas
Low Temperature
Normal Raman Spectroscopy
part per billion/part per million
Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons
Polybrominated Biphenyls
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Radioimmunoassay
Resonance Raman
surface-Enhanced Raman spectroscopy
Supercritical Fluid Chromatography
Signal to Noise Ratio
Synchronous Luminescence
Surface Plasmon Resonance
Total Internal Reflection
Thin Layer Chromatography
Ultraviolet-Visible Spectroscopy
Excitation Wavelength
Emission Wavelength
                                       vi

-------
                               ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

     One of the authors  (DeLyle Eastwood) wishes to acknowledge Russell L.
Lidberg and Gail Gibson  for helping with the luminescence figures and with
completion of the final  version of the text and Table 1.  She also wishes to
thank Clare L. Gerlach for organization of the technical references and for
assistance in the preparation of the final manuscript.  Marianne L. Faber was
responsible for technical editing of this manuscript.  Edward J. Poziomek was
the official reviewer of the document and is thanked for his thoughtful
comments on the scope, organization and technical content of the document.
Donald F. Gurka provided FTZR figures for this report and reviewed the FTZR
and Raman sections as well.

     One of the authors  (Tuan Vo-Dinh) wishes to thank the U.S. Department of
Energy for continuing support (EPA Contract No. DW89933900-0 and DOE Contract
No. 1824-B124-A1).

     Both of the authors wish to thank the many spectroscopists who provided
references or comments for this report and, in particular, Linda J. Cline-Love
for her informal review  comments and the reviewers for the external EPA
Project Report, Earl L.  Henry and Linda B. McGown.
                                      vii

-------
                                    CONTENTS

ABSTRACT   ...............................

TABLES   .................................    V

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS  AND SYMBOLS  ....................   vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS   ...........................
     INTRODUCTION ............................     1
     CONCLUSIONS   ............................     4
     ULTRAVIOLET-VISIBLE ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY   ............    16
           INTRODUCTION  .........................    16
           THEORY   ............................    16
           INSTRUMENTATION ........................    17
           PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS  ....................    18
           CONCLUSIONS ..........................    20
           REFERENCES  ..........................    22
     ULTRAVIOLET-VISIBLE LUMINESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY  ...........    24
           INTRODUCTION  .........................    24
           THEORY   ............................    25
           INSTRUMENTATION ........................    27
           TOTAL LUMINESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY ................    28
           SYNCHRONOUS LUMINESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY .............    29
           ROOM -TEMPERATURE PHOSPHORESCENCE  ...............    33
           CHEMILUMINESCENCE .......................    36
           CONCLUSIONS ..........................    37
           REFERENCES  ..........................    41
     INFRARED ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY ..................    48
           INTRODUCTION  .........................    48
           THEORY   ............................    48
           INSTRUMENTATION ........................    49
           FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY ............    51
           CONCLUSIONS ..........................    55
           REFERENCES  ..........................    57
     RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY .........................    61
           INTRODUCTION  .........................    61
           THEORY   ............................    61
           RESONANCE RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY  .................    65
           SURFACE-ENHANCED RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY ..............    66
           CONCLUSIONS ..........................    70
           REFERENCES  ..........................    71
     SPECTROSCOPIC IMMUNOASSAY TECHNIQUES ................    76
           INTRODUCTION  .........................    76
           DISCUSSION  ..........................    76
           CONCLUSIONS ..........................    79
           REFERENCES  ..........................    80
     FIBER OPTIC CHEMICAL SENSORS ....................    81
           INTRODUCTION  .........................    81
           DISCUSSIpN  ..........................    82
           CONCLUSIONS ..........................    85
           REFERENCES  ..........................    87

 APPENDIX A  ...............................     1
     TYPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT SPECTRA FOR SOME MAJOR
     SPECTROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES ......................     1
                                      viii

-------
                                   SECTION 1
                                 INTRODUCTION
     The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is interested in field
screening of hazardous waste  sites for pollutants in surface and ground water
as well as soil.  Major reasons  for this interest are to achieve improved cost
effectiveness and to expedite remedial investigations at Superfund sites and
thus reduce the time lag between sampling and the receipt of analytical data,
which can often amount to  30  days or more.  Field analytical screening can
also help to confine a detailed  field investigation to those areas of a site
which are truly contaminated  and thus reduce the number of samples sent to the
analytical  laboratory, thereby providing more comprehensive environmental
studies  as  well as  more  relevant data with  reduced cost and time.

     Detailed  characterization of many  chemical pollutants in  environmental
samples  from waste  sites can be  performed using analytical techniques such as
liquid or gas  chromatography and mass  spectrometry.   For many  applications,
these  procedures  are needlessly  time consuming and expensive,   often, optical
spectroscopic  methods and experiments that  are field  deployable or portable
provide attractive alternatives  that permit large  number of  samples  to  be
screened, characterized, and prioritized in the  field with  little or no sample
preparation.  These screening techniques permit  rapid response and consider-
able cost savings because detailed analyses are  required only for a  selected
 subset of samples.  Spectroscopic techniques may sometimes  provide  information
on unusual sample types, or  on  nonvolatile compounds  that  are of high-
molecular weight or thermally labile.  For functional groups or geometrical
 isomers, these techniques may also provide specific information that could not
 be obtained by more common EPA-approved methods such as gas chromatography.
 spectroscopic techniques  may also offer advantages for in situ measurements

-------
(with fiber optics), remote measurements, flow-through analyses, and
nondestructive testing.

     Each spectroscopic technique has certain advantages and disadvantages.
Some may be more widely applicable, may be more feasible for field deployment
using current technology,  or  may be more  specific or sensitive for trace
identification or  classification.  All of the techniques discussed in this
report  have the potential  for field application either by themselves or in
conjunction with appropriate  separation or chromatographic steps.  Recent
rapid advances in  computer hardware and software, chemometrics, and pattern
recognition algorithms, although beyond the  scope of this report, have also
been combined with advances in spectroscopic instrumentation to improve the
analysis of complex environmental pollutant  mixtures and extract maximum
information  from data sets.

     The main objective of this report  is to provide a technical overview and
assessment of the  principal molecular spectroscopic techniques and
instrumentation with applications  for field  screening at hazardous waste
sites.   These methods currently include UV-visible absorption and luminescence
 (electronic)  spectroscopy as well  as  infrared  absorption and Raman
 (vibrational)  spectroscopy.  For  each method,  a brief outline of the
spectroscopic principles  and instrumentation considerations is given to
 familiarize the reader with the present state-of-the-art approach.
Advantages,  limitations,  sensitivities,  and examples of specific techniques
 and their applications to environmental analyses  are also discussed.

      This report is intended to cover the most important spectroscopic
 techniques that haye potential for field applications.  Specific highlights
 are also given for adjunct techniques such as  colorimetric  and  fluorometric
 analysis with chemical derivatization, spectroscopic immunoassay techniques,
 and fiber optic chemical sensors.   The range of possible applications of

-------
spectroscopic methods  for  field analysis is very broad and might include uses
for identification,  classification,  semiguantitation, and quantitation.  A
direct comparison with other types of field analysis is beyond the scope of
this report.

     This report is  meant  as a  technical assessment and source document.  This
document can provide a basis for early decision making on potential
spectroscopic techniques for field surveying.  It is not the intention of this
document to compare  specific instruments or procedures, although some
references are included for  information.  It gives only a broad overview of
time and cost considerations for various instrumental analytical procedures.
The authors consider that  this  report will serve as a useful source of
technical information  and  will  contribute to the appreciation of the
usefulness of molecular spectroscopic techniques for hazardous waste site
screening.  The extensive  reference  sections, although not comprehensive,
gives the reader access to background material related to field applications
of molecular spectroscopic techniques.  This document can serve as a bridge
leading to more detailed reviews for specific decision making.

     Conclusions are given for  each  spectroscopic technique at the end of its
section (Section 3 through 8).   In the general conclusions (Section 2) a table
summarizes the applicability of each spectroscopic technique for field and
laboratory use, together with advantages, limitations,  sensitivity, current
field availability and estimated cost and time.  The figures in Appendix A
illustrate some of the main  spectroscopic approaches as applied to specific
classes of pollutants.  It is hoped  that this overview will allow an
appreciation of the  power  and utility of molecular spectroscopic techniques
for hazardous waste  site screening.

-------
                                   SECTION  2
                                  CONCLUSIONS
     Field screening at hazardous waste sites for pollutants in surface water,
ground water, and soil is of importance because it can expedite remedial
investigations.  Molecular spectroscopic analytical methods applied to field
screening provide an attractive alternative to standard EPA techniques such as
chromatographic and mass spectrometric procedures.  Spectroscopic approaches
can provide valuable qualitative and quantitative information with substantial
savings of time and money.  Instruments and methods are developing rapidly in
this growing area, which can greatly improve environmental analytical
technology.

     Spectroscopic methods that are portable or field deployable permit
samples to be screened and prioritized in the field with little or no sample
preparation.  Spectroscopic methods can sometimes provide information on
unusual sample types or on non-volatile compounds that are of high molecular
weight or that are thermally labile.  These techniques also are advantageous
for in situ or remote measurements, real-time flow-through analysis, and
nondestructive testing.  All of the spectroscopic methods have specific
advantages and shortcomings and have potential applicability for particular
environmental problems.  Table 1 summarizes the advantages, limitations, and
sensitivities with examples of specific techniques and their application to
environmental pollutants.  This table also includes definitions of portable,
field-deployable  and semi-field-deployable instruments and includes relative
estimates of cost and time factors.

-------
     Ultraviolet-visible absorption spectroscopy is a mature technique that
has good quantitative accuracy  for single compounds after separation, or for
simple mixtures.   If it is used in conjunction with high-performance liquid
chromatography  using an optical multichannel  analyzer as a detector, the
entire spectrum for each chromatographic peak can be recorded.  Its
sensitivity is  moderate and  its specificity is low.  Colorimetric reagents can
greatly  increase the  specificity of  the method and  improve sensitivity by
moving the spectrum of the reaction  product into the visible region with high
absorption coefficients,  ultraviolet-visible absorption spectroscopy is most
useful  for unsaturated compounds (aromatic or heterocyclic).

      Ultraviolet-visible luminescence (fluorescence and phosphorescence), when
 applicable, can be the most sensitive spectroscopic technique  for trace  and
 ultratrace analysis,  especially with laser excitation.   It is  useful in
 aqueous solutions to the part per billion to part per trillion level.
 Specific techniques most useful in the  field include synchronous  luminescence
 and room temperature phosphorescence.   Luminescence is applicable to most
 polyaromatic compounds and their derivatives and can be made applied to many
 other compounds by using fluorometric  reagents  for chemical derivatization
 reactions.  It can also be used with high  performance liquid chromatography as
 a multichannel detector.  Luminescence is  much  more selective for
 identification or classification purposes  than  ultraviolet-visible absorption
 but  less  selective than infrared or Raman spectroscopy.  Its selectivity can
 be enhanced using various excitation and  emission  wavelengths and by time or
 phase  resolution methods, and indirect detection methods such as fluorescence
 quenching or  energy  transfer.

       infrared absorption spectroscopy  (dispersive  and  Fourier transform) has
 been used in field applications, especially for monitoring  air pollutants
 using a gas cell, for characterizing oil or hazardous  chemicals  where
  structural information from group frequencies is useful,  and  where  sensitivity

-------
is not the critical factor.   Infrared devices are also useful as  real-time
detectors with GC-FTIR and  for  specific quantitation applications such as oil
and grease.  Disadvantages  include the need for sample preparation in order to
eliminate water which is  the  major interferent, some difficulties related to
quantitation and the mediocre sensitivity of the technique.  Lately, more
compact, rugged instruments along with better sample preparation and signal
processing techniques that  are  designed to increase the sensitivity of this
method have made it more  attractive  for field use.

     Raman spectroscopy complements  infrared spectroscopy because it also
provides structural information but  with different selection rules.  Raman
spectroscopy is not sensitive to water and can use visible or near-infrared
optical techniques.  Until  recently, Raman was considered to have several
disadvantages  for  field use including complex instrumentation, need for laser
excitation and relatively low sensitivity.  These disadvantages have been
               «
reduced by the advent of  more compact Raman spectrometers, smaller and more
rugged lasers, and special, more sensitive Raman techniques.  The most
promising Raman technique for field  use is surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy
in which Raman scattering efficiency can be enhanced by factors of as much as
10* for some compounds when a chemical is adsorbed on a special roughened
metal  (Cu, Ag, Au) surface.  Although this technique may be promising for
future  field applications,  it is not yet fully understood or developed and may
not  apply  to all  chemicals.  The advantage of the technique is that it has the
potential  to combine  the  sensitivity of  luminescence with structural
information  similar to  that provided by  infrared  spectroscopy.

     A comparison of  the  main spectroscopic techniques is given in Table  1 at
the  end of this  section.

     Ancillary techniques that rely on spectroscopic detection and that
greatly enhance the utility of spectroscopic methods include colorimetry,

-------
fluorometry, immunoassay, and some fiber optic chemical sensors.  Fiber optic
sensors may also use some change in the optical properties of the fiber or
cladding or may be used as probes for most of the spectroscopic techniques
discussed.

     Spectroscopic techniques are being used with increasing frequency for
field screening, allowing rapid response and reduced costs for environmental
monitoring programs.   Such techniques also help to optimize sampling efforts
and help to prioritize samples for more detailed analysis.  Some spectroscopic
methods can be used  in place without sampling, e.g. fiber optic chemical
sensors, whereas others can be used with portable instrumentation or field
deployable  instruments set up in a mobile  laboratory.  Recent instrumentation
developments, such  as  more compact lasers, miniaturized optical hardware, new
types of detectors,  increased use of fiber optics, and better computer
software  for  spectral  data processing  and pattern recognition have increased
the utility of  these • spectroscopic methods.

      Further  research and development  efforts  are needed  to  improve the  field
applicability of current and new spectroscopic analytical techniques, to make
instruments more portable and compact.   Also,  new techniques that employ
field-ready instruments  need to be  accompanied by detailed analytical
protocols,  appropriate standards,  calibration criteria and appropriate quality
assurance for specific pollutant classes.  Field spectroscopic  instruments  and
methods are a rapidly improving and growing analytical area which can  greatly
 improve environmental analytical technology.

      A better appreciation of the conclusions, relative to the applicability
 of these spectroscopic techniques,  can be obtained by reviewing Table  1.

-------
                   I.
                            CBARACTBHIETICB   OF   SPBCTROSCOPIC    TECHNIQUES   POR   FIELD   ANALYSIS
                                                                                     OV-V1S ABSORPTION
00
CURRENT RELATED LAB
FIELD TECHNIQUES
APPLICABILITY ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS SENSITIVITY APPLICABILITY 4 SENSORS
VOLYAKOHATIC COHPOUHDS
(PAC«>

DYES

COLORIMETRIC REACTION
PRODUCTS










MATURE TECHNIQUE

I NSXIIU HENTATI OH
READILY AVAILABLE

GOOD QUANTITATIVE
ACCURACY fOR SINGLE
COMPOUNDS AND SINPLE
MIXTURES

FEN INTERFERENCES
BY NOMAROMATICS

SPECTRAL DATA
AVAILABLE


UMSPEClriC
(COMPARED lt> IR AMD
LUMINESCENCE)

EXTENSIVE SAMPLE
PREPARATION

QUANTITATION MAY BE
AFFECTED BY SOLVENT.
POLARITY OR MEDIUM,
CHEMICAL COHPLBXATION






MODERATE SENSITIVITY

ppa - ppb IH FAVORABLE
CASES













PORTABLE
-HAND-HELD COLORIMETER
-COLORXHETRIC KITS

FIELD DEPLOVABLB
INSTRUMENTATION WITH
MULTICHANNEL DETECTORS

HPLC DETECTORS








UV-VIS TECHNIQUES
- PT
- DERIVATIVE

LT MATRIX ISOLATION

RZFIECTAHCE

PH01OACOUSTIC
6PECTROSCOPY

PIBER OPTIC
COLCRIMETRIC SENSORS

MULTICHANNEL DETECTORS
- DIODE ARRAYS
- CCO*
                                                                                                                                                           CONTINUED

-------
                 I.  CONTINUED
VO

CURRENT RELATED LAB
riELO TECHNIQUES
APPLICABILITY ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS SENSITIVITY APPLICABILITY t SENSORS
POLYARONATIC COHPOUHDS

FLUORESCENT DYES
FLUOROHSTRIC REACTION
PRODUCTS

ream

PHENOLS

PESTICIDES

SENIVOLATtLES

NONVOLATILES

PETROLEUM OILS








HOST SENSITIVE HETHOD
FOR TRACE AND
ULTRATRACE ANALYSIS
NHEN AVPLICKBLE

INSTRUMENTATION
REAO1LT AVAILABLE

NO INTERFERENCE BY
HATER

FEN INTERFERENCES BY
NONAAOHATICS

SOHB STRUCTURAL
SPECirlCITT
- ENHANCED BY SPECIAL
TECHNIQUES

VERY SELECTIVE
- ENHANCED BY TIKE AMD
WAVELENGTH
VARIABILITY

CAN DISTINGUISH
GEOMETRICAL I6OHERS
L1HITED TO COHPOUNDS
HITH FAIRLY MICH
LUMINESCENCE YIELDS
(USUALLY FACl. UNLESS
DERIVATIIED)

RELATIVELr UNSPECIFIC
FOR STRUCTURAL
INFORMATION
(COMPAAEO TO IR)

QUAMTITATION
COMPLICATED BY
DIFFERENCES IN QUANTUM
YIELDS, QUENCHING,
HI CSOEHVI RONHENTS

LIMITED REFERENCE
SPECTRA AVAILABLE







EXCELLENT SENSITIVITY

ppt> (pptrtlllon OR
LESS HITH LASER
EXCITATION)

DEPENDENT ON QUANTUM
YIELDS


















PORTABLE INSTRUMENTS
AVAILABLE
FIELD DEPLOYABLB
INSTRUMENTS AVAILABLE

FLOH-THRODCH OIL-HATER
MONITORS AMD HPLC
HITH MULTICHANNEL
DETECTORS

FRONT SURFACE - RTF














LUMINESCENCE
TECHNIQUES
- FLUORESCEHCC
- PHOSPHORESCENCE
- SYNCHRONOUS
- TIME AND PHASE
RESOLUTION
- POLARIZATION
- RT ANO LX
- ID
- MICROSCOPY

FIBER OPTIC
rUIOROHETRIC SENSORS

MULTICHANNEL DETECTORS
- DIODE ARRAYS
- CCDl

FLUORESCENCE QUENCHING
OR ENERGY TRANSFER
- INDIRECT HAYS
TO MEASURE
NONLUHIHESCEHT
HOLEULES

                                                                                                                                                           CONTINUED

-------
1  CONTINUED

CURRENT RELATED LAB
FIELD TECHNIQUES
APPLICABILITY ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS SENSITIVITY APPLICABILITY t SENSORS
INCREASED SPECIFICITY
FOR INDIVIDUAL PRO
OH PAC CLASSES IN
COMPLEX MIXTURE
PETROLEUM OILS
CREOSOTES
INCREASED SPECIFICITY
LESS SPECTRAL
OVERLAP
CLASSIFICATION OP PAH.
BY NUMBER OP R1HCS
USEFUL FOR SCREENING
COHDINB WITH OTHER
LUMINESCENCE
TECHNIQUES
DECREASE IH
SENSITIVITY WITH
NARROWER BANDPASS ES
AND WAVELENGTH OFFSET
LOSS OP VIBRATIONAL
STRUCTURE IH SPECTRUM
NEED DUAL SCANNING
MONOCKROMATORfl
NEED POLYCHROMATIC
SOURCE
COOD SENSITIVITY
SLIGHTLY LOVER THAN
FLUORESCENCE EMISSION
DEPENDENT ON
INSTRUMENTAL
CONDITIONS
DEPENDENT ON STOXES
SHIFT OP COMPOUND
PORTABLE INSTRUMENTS
UNDER DEVELOPMENT
FIELD DEPLOYABLE
INSTRUMENTS AVAILABLE
LT MEASUREMENTS
TIME AMD PHASE
RESOLUTION
DERIVATIVE
REMOTE MONITOR UNDER
DEVELOPMENT
SYNCHRONOUS
PHOSPHORESCENCE
— ——— ^ ^— —— — ^— — — ^—^— — ROOM TBNTEIUTVIIE rKOBrnUKEaiEHCE |HTr| — — — — ^— ^— — — — ^ — ^—
CURRENT RELATED LAB
FIELD TECHNIQUES
APPLICABILITY ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS SENSITIVITY APPLICABILITY * SENSORS
MOST LUMINESCENT PAC*.
PCB., PAH>

DIRECTLY OR HITH HEAVY
ATOM PERTURBED










EASY SAMPLE PHEP

ELIMINATES SCATTER
MID FLUORESCENCE
BACKGROUND

LONGER LIFETIMES THAN
FLUORESCENCE

NO NEED FOR CRYOGENIC
INSTRUMENTATION
USEFUL FOR SCREENING

ADDITIONAL SELECTIVITY
DUE TO PERTURBER
OXYCEH NAY QUENCH
IN SOLUTION

LESS STRUCTURE THAN
LTP

SUBSTRATE/TECHNIQUE
DEPENDENT

QUANTITATION MAY BE
COMPLICATED
LIMITED CORRECTED
SPECTRA AVAILABLE


COOD SENSITIVITY

ppb IH FAVORABLE CASES

DEPENDENT ON QUANTUM
YIELD OP COMPOUND

DEPENDENT OH
EFFICIENCY OF
PCRTURBBR





PORTABLE INSTRUMENTS
UNDER DEVELOPMENT

FIELD DEPLOYABLE
INSTRUMENTS AVAILABLE

PRONT SURFACE

RIGID MEDIUM
- FILTER PAPER
- TLC PLATE
DdSIHETRY

EASY SAMPLE PREP

CAN COMPARE HITH LT
TECHNIQUES FOR
OPTIHI1ATION

TIME RESOLUTION

TLC

ORGAN I I ED MEDIUM
- MICELLE SOLUTION
- CYCLODEKTHIN




                                                                                                                                       CONTINUED

-------
1  CONTINUED

CURRENT RELATED LAB
FIELD TECHNIQUES
APPLICABILITY
LUMINESCENT PAC«

PCB>











ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS SENSITIVITY APPLICABILITY t SENSORS
HIGHER SENSItlVITY,
SPECIFICITY THAN RT

VIBRATIONM. STRUCTURE
SIMILAR TO RAMAN

O.UUITITATIOH OVER
« ORDERS Or HACHITUDE

DISTINGUISH ISOHERfi
VERT SELECTIVE
- BRKAMCED BY TIME AMD
WAVELENGTH
VARIABILITY
CRYOGENIC APPARATUS
HORE COMPLICATED

NEED SKILLED OPERATOR

LESS REfERENCE
SPECTRAL DATA THAN RT

SOME AHALYTES MATRIX
DEPENDENT




EXCELLENT SENSITIVITY

pptrillion IN OPTIMAL
CASES

IMPROVED WITH LASER








LIMITED SEMI-FIELD
DEPLOY ABILITY












LT TECHNIQUES
- SHPOLSKII SPECTRA
- LASER-LINE HARROWING
- SITE SELECTION
- MATRIX ISOLATION

LOU TEMPERATURES
77 K TO 4 K






                                                                                                                                       CONTINUED

-------
TABU 1  CONTINUED
APPLICABILITY
ORGANIC MID INORGANIC
DETERMINATION OP
SPECIFIC FUNCTIONAL
GROUPS
APPLICABILITY
ORGANIC AND INORGANIC
DETERKIHATIOK OP
SPECIFIC PUHCTIOHAL
CROUPE
ROUTINELY USED FOR
REAL-TIME CC AND
VAPOR ANALYSIS
ADVANTAGES
HIGHLY SPECIFIC
STRUCTURAL DATA OH
GROUP FREQUENCIES
NATURE TECHNIQUE
INSTRUMENTATION MIDELY
AVAILABLE
SPECTRAL LIBRARIES
AVAILABLE
AOVAHTAGES
HIGHLY SPECIFIC
STRUCTURAL DATA ON
CROUP FREQUENCIES
INSTRUMENTATION WIDELY
AVAILABLE
REAL-TINE FLOM THROUGH
VAPOR APPLICATIONS
- GC-FTIR
SPECTRAL LIBRARIES
AVAILABLE
LIMITATIONS
MID/LOU SENSITIVITY
MATER IS INTERFERENT
REQUIRES SPECIAL
OPTICS/SOLVENTS
QUAMTITATIOH
DIFFICULTIES
WEAK OPTICAL SOURCES
AMD DETECTORS
LIMITATIONS
LESS SENSITIVE THAN
LUMINESCENCE
REQUIRES SPECIAL
OPTICS/SOLVENTS
CAM TOLERATE SOME
MATER (BACKGROUND
SUBTRACTION)
ORGAHICS DETECTION
1-10 ppthoutind IN
HATER
SENSITIVITY
LESS SENSITIVE THAN
UV-VIS ABSORBANCE
MUCH LESS SENSITIVE
THAN FLUORESCENCE
ppthouiand TO ppn
IN FAVORABLE CASES
SENSITIVITY
MORE SENSITIVE THAN
DISPERSIVE III
- SIGNAL AVERAGING
ppm TO •ubppa IN
FAVORABLE CASES
CURRENT
FIELD
APPLICABILITY
PORTABLE AND FIELD
INSTRUMENTS AVAILABLE
PORTABLE UNIT WITH
CAS CELL
OUAHTITATION OF GREASE
AND OIL
ATM ATTACHMENTS FOR
SOLIDS, OILS
CURRENT
FIELD
APPLICABILITY
FIELD AND SEMI-FIELD
OEPLOYABLE
- WITH OR WITHOUT CC
- VOLATILES /SEMI VOL
ADAPTABLE TO USE
WITH SFC
RELATED LAB
TECHNIQUES
t SENSORS
FTIR
GC/LC-FT1R
RELATED LAB
TECHMZQUES
4 SENSORS
CC/LC-FTIR
MATRIX ISOLATION
- LT FOR SENSITIVITY
HICROSCOPX
                                                                                                                                              CONTINUED

-------
           TABLS 1  COMTIHUED
U)
APPLICABILITY
SINGLE COMPOUNDS
SIMPLE MATRICES
ORGANICS OVERTONES
CURRENT RELATED LAB
FIELD TECHNIQUES
ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS SENSITIVITY APPLICABILITY 4 SENSORS
SOURCES AND OPTICAL
MATERIALS BETTER THAN
HID-IR
OPTICALLY GOOD SENSOR
HATER I ALE-
CM DISTINGUISH MAJOR
COMPONENTS OP SIMPLE
MATRIX
FEWER INTERFERENCES
THAU NID-IR
LESS SPCCTRAL
STRUCTURE THAN MID-IK
- OVERTONE OVERLAP
- LESS sptcxpiein
> INTERPRETATION
COMPLICATED
HOT USEFUL FOR COMPLEX
MATRICES
SIGNAL PROCESSING AMD
PATTERN RECOGNITION
REQUIRED
LOW SENSITIVITY
10 - 1 ppthoutand
PORTABLE NEAR- III
INSTRUMENT WITH FIBER
OPTIC PROBE
CHARACTERISATION OP
OIL
BULK CHEMICAL
ANALYSIS
SURFACE/POLLUTANT
INTERACTION STUDIES
NEAR IR SENSORS
PROCESS CONTROL
                                                                                                                                                       CONTINUED

-------
TABU 1  CONTINUED

CURRENT RELATED LAB
APPLICABILITY
ORGANIC AMD INORGANIC
AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS

BIOLOGICAL MATRICES

POLYMERS









APPLICABILITY
HANV POLLUTANTS
DEMONSTRATED FOR I
- PVRIDIHE
- HYDRAIINB
- PAH»
- PESTICIDES








FIELD TECHNIQUES
ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS SENSITIVITY APPLICABILITY t SENSORS
SPECIFIC AS IB FOR
STRUCTURAL INFORMATION
DIFFERENT SELECTION
MULES - COMPLEMENTS III

FEWER INTERFERENCES
THAN IR IN VIS OR
HEAR-IR REGIONS

HATER AND GLASS NOT
INTERFERENCES
GOOD OPTICS AND
SOLVENTS AVAILABLE
CAN HANDLE UNUSUAL
SAMPLE SHAPES/SUES
ADVANTAGES
SPECIFIC IN STRUCTURAL
INFORMATION
MORE SENSITIVE THAN
NORMAL RAMAN

AS SENSITIVE AS
LUMINESCENCE IN
FAVORABLE CASES

NO INTERFERENCE BY
HATER
|EEE ALSO IIRS)


FLUORESCENCE INTERFER-
ENCE IN UV-VIS
REQUIRES LASER SOURCE

RELATIVELY COMPLEX
INSTRUMENTATION

REQUIRES SKILLED
OPERATOR

NOT AS NATURE AS IR
RELATIVELY POOR LIMITS
OF DETECTION


MODERATE SENSITIVITY
1000 - 20 ppa













SENI-FIELD DEPLOYABLB
INSTRUMENTS UNDER
DEVELOPMENT













RESEARCH IN I
- AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS
- BIOLOGICAL MATRICES
- POLYMERS

SPECIAL RAMAN
TECHNIQUES
- SERB
- RESONANCE
- CARS
- MICROPROBES
- MICROSCOPY
LT APPLICATIONS



CURRENT RELATED LAB
FIELD TECHNIQUES
LIMITATIONS SENSITIVITY APPLICABILITY I SENSORS
RELATIVELY NEW TECH.
SURFACE/SUBSTRATE
MATERIAL DEPENDENT
REPRODUCIBILITY

REQUIRES LASER AND
SPECIAL SUBSTRATE

NOT ALL ANALYTES
ENHANCED EQUALLY
FEW SPECTRAL LIBRARIES

(SEE ALSO NRS)
GOOD SENSITIVITY FOR
SELECTED ANALYTES
ppn. - ppb IN
FAVORABLE CASES










FIELD DEPLOYABLE
INSTRUMENTATION UNDER
DEVELOPMENT











RESEARCH TO OPTIMIXB
TECHNIQUES
MICROSCOPY
HICROPROBES

SURFACE STUDIES

FIBER OPTIC SENSORS

HPLC
(UKDER DEVELOPMENT)
MULTICHANNEL DETECTORS

                                                                                                                                           CONTINUED

-------
           TABLE 1  CONTINUED
Ul

CURRENT RELATED LAB
FIELD TECHNIQUES
APPLICABILITY ADVANTAGES LIMITATIONS SENSITIVITY APPLICABILITY 1 SENSORS
PACe ABSORBING IN UV
PHENOLS




SPECIFIC IN STRUCTURE
HAY ELIMINATE
FLUORESCENCE
BACKGROUND
(SEE ALSO NRS)




ONLY CHROHOPHORE
VIBRATIONS ENHANCED
LI HI TED TO UV
ABSORBING COMPOUNDS
- HMNLT PkCll
OUANTITATIOH DIFFICULT
HOI COMPARABLE TO
OTHER RAMAN
TECHNIQUES
UV LASER SOURCE
COMPLEX
INSTRUMENTATION
(SEE ALSO NRS|
FAIR SENSITIVITY IN
FAVORABLE CASES WITH
CHROHOPHORE VIBRATIONS




HAMY PRACTICAL
DIFFICULTIES




CHROMOPHORS
CHARACTERIIATIOH
BIOLOGICAL APPLICATION




               DEFINITIONS OF PORTABLE.  FIELD DEPLOY ABLE.  AMD SEMI-FIELD DEPLOXABLE AS USED IN THIS TABLE AREI
               PORTABLE I
               BATTERY POWERED
               ONE PERSON CAR CARRY
               LITTLE SAMPLE PREP. ( <10 HIM.)
                               < $10,000.
               INSTRUMENT COST
               ANALYSIS COST < (10.
                         FIELD OEPLOYABLEl
                         GENERATOR POWERED
                         COMPACT, TNO PEOPLE CAN LIFT ISEVERAL INSTRUMENTS IN MOBILE LAB)
                         RELATIVELY SIMPLE SAMPLE PREP. | <1 HR.)
                         INSTRUMENT COST ilo,OOO. TO SIOO.QDD.
                         ANALYSIS COST tit. - 1100.
               DEFINITIONS OF ABBREVIATIONS AS USED IN THIS TABLE AREi
               ATR
               CARS
               CCD
               rriR
               cc
               HPLC
               IR
               LC
               LT
               N«S
Attenuated Totil Reflectance
Coherent Anti-Stake* Raaan Spectroicopy
Charae-Coupled Device
Fancier Trenafora-Infrated Spec trot copy
Gae Chraaatography
High Performance Liquid Chronatography
Infrared Epactroacopy
Liquid Chroaatoqrephy
Low Tenperetate
Normal Haaan Spectroacopy
                                  SEHI-FIELD DEFLOTABLEl
                                  CAN FIT IK MOBILE LAB
                                  COMPLEX OR FRAGILE  INSTRUMENT
                                  OFTEN CONSIDERABLE  SAMPLE  PREP.  (  >t HB.)
                                  INSTRUMENT COST > SIOO.OOO.
                                  ANALYSIS COST > flOO.
PAC              Polyarooatic Conpounde
PAH              Polyerooatic Hydrocarbane
PCS              Polychlorlnated Slphenyla
ppb/ppn          pact par billion/part par  Billion (n
RTP              Rood Temperature Phoepnoreecanca
SERS             Surface-Enhanced Kaaan  Spacecoacopy
SFC              Supercritical Fluid Chroaato?raphy
TLC              Thin-Layer Chroaetography
UV-VIS           Ultraviotet-Viaibla Spectroecopy

-------
                                   SECTION 3
                  ULTRAVIOLET-VISIBLE ABSORPTION  SPECTROSCOPY
INTRODUCTION
     Ultraviolet-visible  (UV-vis) absorption spectroscopy has long been
accepted as a mature  -workhorse- technique especially suited for quantitative
analysis in samples of  limited complexity  (Wehry, quoted in Bjorseth, 1983).
THEORY
      The theory involved in absorption spectroscopy has been discussed in many
 standard texts' such as Murrell (1963), Burgess  and Knowles  (1981)  and will  be
 mentioned only briefly here.  Most of the organic  molecules that absorb
 strongly in the UV-vis are unsaturated, aromatic,  or  heterocyclic aromatic
 molecules.  The electronic transitions involve  the excitation of one electron
 from a bonding n to an antibonding n molecular  orbital.   Most polycyclic
 aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) have spectra of this  type containing considerable
 vibrational fine structure, but the spectra of  their polar derivatives have
 much less well-resolved structure in  liquid solution.  For some heterocycles
 and carbonyls, an unshared electron pair occupies a nonbonding orbital on the
 heteroatom or  carbonyl oxygen.  One of the nonbonding electrons can sometimes
 be promoted to an antibonding n orbital  (n to *•).  This transition, although
 formally forbidden  by quantum mechanical selection rules, can occur, and this
 n to rr* transition  is then often  at  longer wavelengths and much less intense
 than IT to n*  transitions.
                                        16

-------
     As described  above,  the light  absorbed corresponds to electronic
transitions  from the  ground state to different excited states of the molecule,
usually in the  10'"  second tine span.   Usually,  a double beam instrument is
used and  light  is  simultaneously transmitted through the sample and through a
reference cell  containing solvent.  The basic equation for light transmission
(sometimes called  the Beer-Lambert  Lav) can be expressed as:
     where
     I = intensity of the transmitted radiation
     I, = intensity of incident radiation
     £ = molar absorptivity  (LlT'cm'1)
     C = molar concentration (ML'*)
     d - thickness of sample  (cm)
     Absorbance,  transmittance  and  intensity can then be related as:
                        absorbance = A  = Iog1( -1 = GCd
                            transmittance * T  • —
INSTRUMENTAT ION
     (TV- vis double beam absorption spectrophotometers , usually using deuterium
sources for the UV spectral region and tungsten sources for the visible region
and photomultiplier or photodiode detection, have been discussed in many
standard texts (Burgess and Knowles, 1981) and will not be treated in detail
here.  The increased availability of multichannel detectors such as photodiode
array detectors (PDAs) with millisecond responses has led to increased use of
these devices with high performance liquid chromatography (SPLC) or
supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) on a real-time basis.  These rapidly
developing techniques have potential for increased use in field laboratories.
                                      17

-------
 PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

      Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs),  in particular,  have well-
 structured UV-vis absorption spectra which are  useful for identification
 purposes.  UV-vis absorption has the disadvantages of relatively low
 sensitivity and selectivity, as compared with luminescence techniques.   UV
 absorption spectroscopy can be useful for nonfluorescent compounds or for dyes
 absorbing in the near UV or visible region of the spectrum.  Recent uses have
 generally included low-temperature matrix isolation or Shpol'akii applications
 (Meyer,  1971; nakhimovsky,  1989),  (much more commonly used with UV-vis
 luminescence for analytical applications) which are not practical for field
 use,  or  computer derivatization, which enhances the observed spectral
 structure for the analyst.

      Second derivative spectrometers  have been  available for almost two
 decades  (see Eager,  1973; Hawthorne,  1980).   Haas  et al.  (1988)  have  developed
 and field-tested a portable spectrometer for second derivative  absorption
 spectrometry for the screening of  aromatic contaminants  in ground water.
 Benzene  and other aromatics such as phenols  have been analyzed  at the ppm
 (pg/mL)  level in a shallow  ground-water well by using a  prototype instrument
with  a 5-m fiber optic probe,   in  comparison, a more  sensitive  fluorescence
method,  also in  the  second  derivative mode,  can monitor  benzene and phenols to
the ppb  (ng/mL)  level (Vo-Oinh, in Eastwood,  1981).   The  second derivative
absorption technique has limited applicability  for  complex mixtures because so
many  compounds absorb in the same  region,  but may be  satisfactory for
relatively simple mixtures  at  the  ppm level.

      Colorimetric techniques using chemical derivatization to move the absorp-
tion  spectrum of  the  complex into the visible region have long been used for
quantitation.  For screening purposes, a  field kit has recently proven useful
for PAHs,  and a separate kit is available  for polychlorinated biphenyls
                                      16

-------
(PCBs).  The field method for analysis of aromatics at the sub-ppm level
developed by Hanby (1988) uses the Friedel-Crafts reaction.  An alkyl halide
extractant and the polyaromatic pollutant form electrophilic aromatic
substitution products with the Lewis acid catalyst, which also serves as the
dehydrant necessary  for this Friedel-Crafts reaction.  These products are very
large molecules that have a high degree of electron delocalization.  Hence,
they are intensely colored and can be compared with appropriate color charts.
A variation of this  method can be used for analysis of trichloroethylene.
Hanby (1988) states  that this method is more accurate than direct-injection
gas chromatography,  but that it has the disadvantage of being relatively
cumbersome in the chemicals and equipment required.

     Several kits have been developed that rely on colorimetric spot tests or
sensitive papers for selected environmental analyses (Leichnitz, 1979; Hach,
1988).  These established techniques have limited applicability to complex
environmental samples but can be used for field-monitoring specific major
pollutants, especially when they have been verified by other techniques.
Hand-held colorimeters have proven useful, but their applicability does not
extend into the UV region.  Colorimetric techniques are also being applied to
fiber-optic chemical sensors, but the required chemistry is more complex
because the reagent  should be stable for long periods of time, and must be
immobilized on the fiber.  In addition, the chemical reactions involved should
be easily reversible for some sensors, yet other sensors, designed to be
integrating probes,  would require nonreversible reactions.

     woolerton et al. (1988) discussed a qualitative KWIK-SKRENE  colorimetric
method for PCBs in dielectric oils or soil.  This method can detect
approximately 10 ppra of Aroclor 1260, but the chemical equipment may be cum-
bersome and some interferences may occur.
                                      19

-------
     Colorimetric detection is also used with bioassay and immunoassay
techniques.  Sellers  (1979) reported the detection of numerous pesticides
including Baygon*, carbaryl, diazinon, Dursban',  and  malathion  in water  to  10
ppm or less using enzyme test tickets and pretreatment with bromine.  The
method works by measuring  the inhibition of  the  enzyme cholinesterase in
solution by organophosphate and  carbamate pesticides with colorimetric
detection  (absence  of color indicating  a positive test).  The  bromine serves
to improve the sensitivity of diazinon, Dursban*, and malathion by converting
them from  phosphorothionates to  phosphates  by oxidative  desulfurization.   The
tickets  are  stable under field conditions  between 4«C  and  40»C for  as long as
8 months.

      This  discussion does not attempt to give a comprehensive  survey of the
colorimetric literature; it presents highlights and references for
colorimetric reactions and biomarker reactions that use colorimetric
detection.
 CONCLUSIONS
      UV-vis absorption is a mature technique for quantitating and semi-
 quantitating pollutants after separation or in relatively simple mixtures.
 Because  it is  relatively insensitive  (as compared  to UV-vis luminescence),
 relatively unstructured  (as compared  to infrared),  and subject to interfer-
 ences, at least in the UV region,  it  is most useful for pollutants where
 alternative  luminescence techniques do not exist or for compounds that absorb
 strongly in  the visible  region,  such  as non-fluorescent dyes or colorimetric
 reaction products.

       Hand-held colorimeters are potentially  useful for  screening, but
 currently do not extend to the UV region.   The use of UV-intensified diode
                                        20

-------
optical multichannel devices  for absorption detection is increasing for EPLCs
and for real-tine,  flow-through applications.

     For field use, colorimetric applications, either as sensitive papers,
tubes, or spot-tests, or as colorimetric fiber-optic sensors deserve more
attention.  However, these methods are usually designed to apply to specific
pollutants and therefore will lack general applicability.  Although
colorimetric reagents were extensively discussed in the older literature, many
had unstable chemistries, numerous interferences, or were not sufficiently
specific.  For example, metal chelate reagents often produce products that
have similar spectra for many different metals in addition to the target
metal.  Also, some  potentially useful colorimetric reagents which are not
commercially available or have undesirable characteristics (instability,
toxicity, mutagenicity, etc.) rendering their use by unskilled personnel
difficult.  Seawater may also be an interferent for some colorimetric methods
(Eastwood, private  communication).  Colorimetric reagents were formerly not
required to be stable for long periods of time under field conditions.  A new
look at colorimetric reagents to supplement fluorometric reagents is needed,
if better colorimetric sensors are to be developed.
                                      21

-------
                                   REFERENCES


     This reference section contains  all references  cited and  an  additional
selection of definitive references that should  provide  the reader with  a basic
understanding of  ultraviolet-visible  absorption spectroscopy.


Burgess, C. and Knowles,  A.,  Eds.,  Techniques in Visible  and Ultraviolet
spectrometry. Vol.  II.  chapman and Hall,  London, 1981.

Chemetrics Catalog,  1988/1989.

Duquette, P. H.,  Guire, p.  E.,  and Swanson, H.  J., "Fieldable  Enzyme
immunoassay Kits  for Pesticides,*  Proceedings,  First international symposium
on Field Screening  Methods  for Hazardous  Waste  Site  Investigations, Las Vegas,
NV, 1988, pp 239-242.

Eastwood, o., "Use  of Luminescence spectroscopy in oil  Identification," in
Modern Fluorescence Spectrogcopy.  E.  L. Wehry,  Ed.,  Vol.  4. 1981, pp 251-275.

Haas III, J. W.,  Lee, E.  Y.,  Thomas,  C.  L., Gammage,  R. B., "Second -
Derivative ultraviolet  Absorption  Monitoring of Aromatic  Contaminants in
croundwaters," Proceedings,  First  International symposium on Field Screening
Methods for Hazardous Waste Site Investigations, Las Vegas, NV, 1988, pp 105-
106.

Hach Company, PR/2000 soectrophotometer Handbook. Bach, 1988.

Hager, R. N., Anal.  Chem.,  Vol. 45, 1973, pp 1131-1132.

Hanby, J. D., "A  New Method for the Detection and Measurement  of Aromatic
Compounds in Water," Proceedings,  First International Symposium on Field
Screening Methods for Hazardous Waste Site Investigations, Las Vegas, NV,
1988, pp 389-394.

Hawthorne, A. R., Amer. Ind.  Hyg.  Assoc.  J., Vol. 41, 1980,
p 915.

Herzberg, G., Molecular spectra and Molecular Structure; Vol.  3s Electronic
Spectra and Electronic  Structure of Polyatomic  Molecules; Van  Nostrand
Reinhold, NY, 1966.

Jungreis, E., spot  Test Analysis.  John  Wiley &  Sons,  NY,  1985.

Leichnitz, K., Ed.,  Detector  Tube  Handbook;  Air Investigations and Technical
Gas Analysis with Drager  Tubes. 4th Edition, 1979.

Meyer, B., Low Temperature  Spectroscopy.  Elsevier, NY,  1971.

Miller, J. N., Edf.;  standards in Fluorescence Spectrometrvi chapman and Hall,
London, 1931.

Murrell, J. N., The  Theory  of the  Electronic Spectra  of Organic Molecules;
John Wiley & Sons, NY,  1963.
                                      22

-------
Nakhiroovsky, L. A.,  Lamotte,  M.,  and  Jouaset-Dubien, J.f Handbook of Low
Temperature Electronic  Spectra  of Polvcyelic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Elsevier,
NY,  1989.

Orodpour, M., Anderson,  K. w.,  and Anderson, J. C., "Analysis of Two Component
Systems Utilizing  Second Derivative UV-Visible Spectroscopy," presented at the
Pittsburgh Conference,  Atlanta, GA, March  1989, poster.

Ruch, W. E., Ed.,  Chemical Detection  of Gaseous Pollutants; &n Annotated
Bibliography. Ann  Arbor Science,  Ann  Arbor, HI, 1966.

Sellers, D. R., "Feasibility  of Monitoring Pesticide Breakthrough from
Charcoal Columns," U.S.  Army  Medical  Research and Development Command Final
Report, 1979.

Henry, E. L., "Optical  Spectrometric  Techniques for Determination of
Polycyclic Aromatic  Hydrocarbons," in Bjorseth, A., Handbook of Polvcyelic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons.  Marcel Dekker, NY,  1983.

Woollerton, G. R., Valin, s., and Gibeault, T.f "The Kwik-skrene Analytical
Testing system Description of a Tool  for Remediation of PCS spills,"
Proceedings First  international Symposium  on Field screening Methods for
Hazardous Waste Srce Investigations,  Las Vegas, NV, 1988, pp 387-388.

Vanderlaan, M., Watkins,  B. and stanker, L., "Immunochenical Quantification of
Dioxins in industrial chemicals and soils," Proceedings, First international
symposium on Field Screening  Methods  for Hazardous Haste Site Investigations,
Las Vegas, NV, 1988, pp  249-250.

zander, M., "Ultraviolet  Absorption and Luminescence spectrometry:  an Overview
of Recent Developments,"  chapter  6 in chemical Analysis of Polvcvclie Aromatic
Compounds. T. Vo-Dinh, Ed., John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1989, pp 171-200.
                                      23

-------
                                   SECTION 4
                 ULTRAVIOLET-VISIBLE LUMINESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY

INTRODUCTION

     Ultraviolet-visible  (UV-vis) photoluminescence (fluorescence or phosphor-
escence) has become  a  well-established technique for field and laboratory
screening and for  specific  guantitation applications using both scanning and
filter spectrofluorometers.  Luminescence has the advantages of very high sen-
sitivity for some  classes of pollutants, good selectivity, relative freedom
from interferences by  water and non-fluorescing chemicals, ease of sample
preparation, and availability of field-deployable instrumentation.
              *
Disadvantages include:  wide variability in fluorescence yields, matrix and
microenvironment effects, and quenching effects.  Since the mid-1970s, the
United states Coast  Guard has been using standard fluorescence techniques in
mobile laboratories  for oil spill identification (U.S. coast Guard, 1977).
These procedures also  served as the basis for American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) methods  such as ASTM D3650-78.  The EPA in Ediaon, NJ has
developed similar  methods for monitoring oils and hazardous chemicals at
spills and at Super fund sites (Remeta and Gruenfeld, 1987).  In addition to
aroma tic 3, PAHs, and oils,  luminescence has been shown to be useful for
pollutants such as phenols, PCBs, and some pesticides, heterocycles, and metal
complexes.

     These methods are still being used, for the most part with standard flu-
orescence emission techniques,  significant developments have taken place in
sources, such as lasers and miniaturized lamps, and in detectors,  with near-
infrared detectors becoming more common.  Of special importance is the
                                      24

-------
increased use of  photodiode  arrays, and more recently, CCDa, which have
allowed real-time spectra  to be generated  for use with hyphenated techniques
such as BPLC, SFC,  and time-resolved measurements.  Increased use of computer
automation, signal processing, and computerized library search routines,
together with commercially available spectrofluorometers that yield corrected
fluorescence spectra,  has  allowed for  intercomparison of fluorescence  spectral
data.  Libraries  of corrected fluorescence spectra have, until recently,  been
unavailable, with exceptions such as Berlman (1971) and Brownrigg et al.
(1979).
THEORY
     Conventional  luminescence spectroscopy uses either a fixed wavelength
excitation  (!„) to produce  an emission  spectrum or, less commonly, a fixed
emission wavelength (X..)  to record an excitation spectrum.  Excitation
              «,
spectra are occasionally  used for comparison with UV-vis absorption spectra
for the identification of unknown compounds.

     In the last section, the Beer-Lambert Law was stated to be I = I.10"68*
where I was the transmitted light.  The following discussion is based on
Killer (1981):

        J, a1.*, =  I.*i
-------
                               I = 2.303 If  €Cd
                                r
     Assuming the assumptions  above  are valid, this equation  ia frequently
used to show that:
     (1)    the intensity of the  fluorescence is directly proportional to the
            intensity of the exciting  light, so that the more intense the
            light source, the  more intense the fluorescence (hence the
            advantage of lasers assuming that photodecomposition does not take
            place);
     (2)    fluorescence intensity for a compound depends on  € at the exciting
            wavelength as well as on the quantum yield;
     (3)    the intensity of fluorescence is directly proportional to
            concentration of the  analyte.
     The assumptions and approximations involved in deriving  this equation are
often overlooked.

     For organic molecules in  solution or solid state, the following general
theory applies:  the essence of photoluminescence spectroscopy is that a
molecular sample, excited by light from an external source, emits light at
different wavelengths (usually longer  than the excitation wavelength) as
fluorescence or phosphorescence.  In luminescence spectroscopy, the observed
transitions are electronic transitions with vibrational structure; the
selection rules for the vibrational  structure are the same as those in Raman
spectroscopy, that is, allowed vibrational transitions are those which
correspond to changes in polar izability of the molecule.

      Usually, on excitation with ultraviolet or visible light, the decay of
the molecule to the lowest excited singlet is radiationless .  Radiative
                /
transitions from the lowest excited  singlet to different vibrational levels of
the ground state give rise to  fluorescence emission.  The lifetimes for these
fluorescence decays are usually from 10*"  to  10"'  seconds.  Mixing  of  the
                                      26

-------
singlet states with  the  lowest multiplet (usually  triplet)  states permits
radiative transitions  (phosphorescence)  from the lowest triplet state to the
ground state to occur.   This transition  is  usually forbidden to occur due to
spin-selection rules.  The  lifetime of the  phosphorescence  decay can vary from
10** seconds to several seconds.  Phosphorescence,  as will be discussed later,
is easily quenched because  of its longer lifetime  and therefore is usually
observed only at  low temperatures, in rigid matrices or in  organized media, or
in the absence of oxygen.   Because light must be absorbed and then re-emitted
radiatively, in competition with radiationless deactivation processes,
molecules with high  luminescence quantum yields on excitation in the near-
ultraviolet or visible regions are normally those  with aromatic or
heterocyclic structures  (with extended IT or conjugated-bonding).  In-depth
discussion of the theory of photoluminescence is available  in standard texts
such as Parker (1968), Becker (1969), Miller (1981), and Vo-Dinh (1984).

INSTRUMENTATION

     For most commercial spectrofluorometers, xenon arc lamps are used as
excitation sources,  although mercury or  other line sources  or lasers with
fixed or tunable  wavelengths may be used.   Although some types of lasers, such
as diode lasers,  nitrogen-dye lasers and even excinter lasers, are being made
more compact and  rugged  to  be more suitable for field deployment, there are
also disadvantages for field use such as relatively high coat, relative
fragility and frequent lack of tunability.   Probably lasers should be used
only when their special  features are required or when factors such as limited
sample size or restricted detection volume  are involved.  For scanning
spectrofluorometers, the continuous spectrum of the light source is dispersed
by using an excitation monochromator, which can be scanned  mechanically to
choose the excitation wavelength region  with a selected bandpass.  The emitted
light originating from the  sample is usually detected at right angles to the
exciting light by an emission monochromator coupled to a detector.
                                       27

-------
Photomultiplier tubes  are the most commonly used detectors,  but multichannel
detectors  are  gaining  popularity.   Further discussions of  instrumental
considerations for photoluminescence are available  in standard texts  (Miller,
1981;  schulman,  1985).   A portable luminescence  device with  a fiber optic
probe  has  recently become commercially available for field measurements using
a fixed excitation wavelength (Environmental systems Corporation, 1988) and is
being  modified to  allow synchronous luminescence measurements.  This
instrument was used for sensitized fluorescence  spot tests of PAHs (Vo-Dinh
and White,  1986).

TOTAL  LUMINESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY

     Total luminescence (also called contour luminescence  or excitation-
emission arrays) contains all of the information in the excitation and
emission spectra of the mixtures.   A total luminescence spectrum can be
computer-derived by using consecutive emission spectra generated at different
excitation wavelengths.   The  complexity of the observed arrays, which are
generally  instrument dependent and often contain more information than is
needed,  has led to relatively little use of this  technique.  Christian et al.
in Wehry (1981) showed  that such arrays could be  generated in seconds using a
videofluorometer.   Warner et  al. (1979)  discussed the design of such a system
and multicomponent data reduction  schemes.   Although the feasibility of
analyzing  environmental samples by BPLC with this technique has been demon-
strated, it has not been used in the field.   Denton et al. (1987,  1988,  1989)
has demonstrated CCDs in spectroscopic  detection.  This technology promises to
greatly  improve spectroscopic instrumentation.  When used for complex
mixtures,  it should be  combined with appropriate  feature extraction techniques
to eliminate redundant  information and  to select  the most important features.
It is  most  useful  for feasibility  studies  on  new analytes or sample types.
                                      28

-------
SYNCHRONOUS LUMINESCENCE SPECTROSCOPE

     Synchronous luminescence  (SL) spectroscopy, introduced by Lloyd (1971),
generates spectra which are more simplified cross-sections of excitation-
emission arrays.  These spectra can be rapidly and easily produced by
commercial spectrofluorometers.  SL procedures have advantages over conven-
tional luminescence for environmental screening procedures because they reduce
or eliminate the frequent overlap of various emissions from the numerous
compounds in complex mixtures.  Another unique feature of the SL technique is
the capability to provide spectral information in one measurement scan, for
PAH compounds with different numbers of fused rings.  This technique has been
discussed in detail by Vo-Dinh, in Wehry (1981) and elsewhere.

     With synchronous spectroscopy, the luminescence signal is recorded while
both X.. and XH are simultaneously scanned  (Lloyd, 1978; Vo-Dinh, 1978).  A
              s
constant wavelength interval is maintained between the excitation and the
emission monochromators throughout the spectrum.  As a result, the intensity
of the synchronous signal Zu,  can be written as a product of two functions as
follows:
     where:
     k = a constant
     c = concentration of the analyte
     EE • excitation function
     Ea = emission function

     For a single molecular species, the observed intensity Xa is simplified,
often to a single peak, and the bandwidth of the peak is narrower than for the
conventional emission spectrum.  Even for broad and featureless excitation and
emission spectra of molecules such as phenol, the synchronous signal will be
narrow.  This feature can significantly reduce spectral overlap in multi-
                                      29

-------
 component mixtures,  correlation of the signal wavelength position with the
 structure of the compounds becomes easier.   For example,  the spectrum of an
 aromatic compound with a larger number of rings occurs generally at a longer
 wavelength than the spectrum of a compound with a smaller number of rings.
 With conventional spectroscopy, this basic rule cannot often be utilized
 advantageously due to severe spectral overlap.   By confining each individual
 spectrum to a narrow and definite spectral band,  the synchronous method offers
 the possibility of identifying specific compounds or a class of compounds in a
 mixture.

      A synchronous spectrum can be visualized  on an excitation-emission matrix
 (EEM)  as a 45° line parallel to,  and to the red of,  the scattered excitation
 light (an emission spectrum would be represented as  a horizontal line on the
 same matrix).   For a small wavelength offset,  similar to  the stokes  shift, the
 resulting spectrum contains only  a few peaks corresponding to zero-zero
 transitions of fluorescent compounds in the mixture.   For pattern  recognition
 in  complex mixtures, larger wavelength offsets  may also be used on an
 empirical basis,   variable SL,  scanning the excitation and emission
 monochromators at different speeds,  was used by Kubic  et  al.  (1980) to  get
 other cross-sections of  the contour array.  Another version  of  SL uses  a
 constant AE rather than  AX,  which is more theoretically significant.

      Synchronous  techniques work  especially well to produce  simple spectra for
 PAH mixtures whose components have  spectra  with well-defined  vibronic bands.
 The technique  may be less  specific  for  spectra with asymmetric or unstructured
 peaks  or where the zero-zero transition  is  not strong.

      SL offers instrumental  simplicity.  Devices intended for conventional
 fixed-excitation  spectra can often be employed for synchronous measurements
with little or no modification.  Several spectrometers are available with pro-
vision for  interlocking  the  excitation and emission monochromators.  A variety

                                      30

-------
of environmental  samples  has  been analyzed to illustrate the applicability of
the SL techniques for  screening PAH compounds in waste waters.   (Abbott et
al., 1986).

     The  simple method of SL  analysis  opens  up many possibilities for
monitoring organic pollutants by luminescence spectroscopy.  The SL technique
can be applied to obtain not  only spectroscopic  fingerprints from complex
samples,  such as  oil spills as discussed by  Eastwood  in Wehry  (1981), but also
specific  information of analytical interest  regarding individual pollutants  or
pollutant classes.  The synchronous fluorescence technique has already been
used  for  some field applications and,  because of its  simplicity, has  immediate
applicability for use in mobile field laboratories and potential applicability
for use  with portable instruments that have  fiber optic  probes. Vo-Dinh  and
Abbott (1984) have successfully used this technique to rank relative  amounts
of different PAH classes as  compared to other more standard methods of
 analysis.  A protocol for total PAH characterization and quantitation based  on
 fluorescence emission and synchronous spectra is now under development  at EPA-
 Las Vegas  (Eastwood et al.,  1989).

      The  derivative technique,  usually but  not always the second derivative,
 can be used to enhance the selectivity of photoluminescence techniques
 including synchronous  fluorescence.   In  this mode of data representation, the
 signal produced  is proportional to the  second-derivative  (d1)  of the  spectrum
 with respect  to  wavelength.   Second-derivative  signals can be  obtained by
 numerical differentiation, modulation techniques, or direct electronic
 differentiation.  (Green and O'Haver, 1974).  In  the d1  mode the measurement
 is of the rate of change of  curvature of a  peak.  Broad peaks  are eliminated
 in the recording, but sharp  spectral  features are intensified;  hence, this
 technique provides improved compound selectivity and quantitation.
                                        31

-------
     The synchronous and derivative techniques can be combined for many of
environmental sample analysis applications.  Purcell et alr in Cline-Love and
Eastwood (1985), successfully separated the SI, peaks of phenol, o-cresol, m-
cresol, and p-cresol by taking the fourth derivative (applying the second
derivative twice) of the SL  system.

     Luminescence spectroscopy is especially well-suited for determination of
chemicals that fluoresce in  complex mixtures, due to the multidimensional
nature of the information  available in the luminescence spectrum.  For
analytical purposes, luminescence excitation and emission spectra, lifetimes,
polarization, and quenching  or enhancement by perturbers are some of the
independent dimensions of  analytical information.

     AS an example, fluorescent compounds with highly overlapping emission and
excitation spectra may have  different fluorescence lifetimes so that their
relative intensity contributions can be resolved in the lifetime domain.  Even
with HPLC analysis, separation of PACa in complex real-world samples can be
difficult.  McGown (1989)  has used the fluorescence lifetime information
provided by phase-modulation fluorescence to strengthen the quantitative
analysis of fluorescence detection for HPLC.  For on-line detection,
fluorescence lifetime heterogeneity of chromatographic peaks are used as an
indicator of the purity of the peaks.

     Phase-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy (POTS) has not yet been used in
the field, but is under consideration for use with HPLC and with fiber-optic
remote sensors.  Commercial  instrumentation for PRFS is compact enough to fit
in a mobile laboratory.

     These techniques are  most valuable in situations where the variations in
the composition of complex samples (containing a large number of organic com-
pounds, e.g., oil spills [Eastwood in Wehry, 1981],  exhaust soot,  by-product
                                      32

-------
water  [Vo-Dinh in Wehry,  1981])  fail  to provide  significant changes  in the
conventional  fluorescence spectrum.

ROOM TEMPERATURE  PHOSPHORESCENCE

     Phosphorescence has  an  advantage in that many interferences, such as
fluorescence  emission as  well as Rayleigh and Raman scattering, can  be
eliminated either by wavelength  or lifetime  selectivity.  Although low-
temperature luminescence  techniques such as  laser-excited Shpol'skii, line-
narrowing fluorescence, or matrix isolation  spectroscopy appear to be more
suitable for  laboratory applications,  room temperature phosphorescence (RTF)
enhancement is  gaining increased interest for field applications (Vo-Dinh,
1984).  RTP techniques usually require adsorption on solid  substrates or
stabilization in  organized media such as micelles (Cline-Love and Skrilec,
1981) or cyclodextrins (Warner in Eastwood and Cline-Love,  1988) to avoid
quenching by  intermolecular collisions  or by oxygen processes that might lead
to the deactivation of the phosphorescent triplet state.

     The following is a brief discussion of  the theory of phosphorescence (for
further discussion see Vo-Dinh [1984]).  From the first excited singlet Slf
the molecule may  undergo transition to  some  vibrational level of the triplet
manifold via  a mechanism known as intersystem crossing (ISC),  intersystem
crossing is possible because of  the coupling of the electron spin with the
orbital angular momentum which produces a quantum mechanical mixing of states
of different multiplicities.  The molecule then relaxes to the lowest vibra-
tional level of Tt by radiationless vibrational relaxation processes.  From Tt
the molecule may  return to the different vibrational levels of the ground
state so  either by a radiationless deactivation process or by the emission of
a photon (phosphorescence).  A less common emission process, delayed
fluorescence, can also occur by repopulation of the st state by thermal
activation or by triplet-triplet interaction.
                                      33

-------
     Because of its 3pin-forbidden nature, phosphorescence emission exhibits
typically longer decay tines than the  spin-allowed fluorescence process,  in
liquid solutions at room temperature,  bi- and mono-molecular quenching proc-
esses usually cause nonradiative deactivation of the triplet state.  The pre-
sence of oxygen, an efficient triplet  quencher, is also a major contributor to
the radiationless deactivation of the  triplet level.  The radiationless deac-
tivation process for most molecules  in the triplet state is so efficient that
phosphorescence can normally be observed only when the solution is frozen into
rigid matrices (Birks, 1970).  Conventional methods in phosphorimetry,
therefore, involve:  (1) careful preparation of oxygen-free solutions, <2)
insertion of analyte compounds into  polymer samples, or (3) use of rigid
matrices of frozen organic solvent.  The first two techniques involve tedious
and time-consuming preparation, the  third requires experiments at low
temperatures, usually 7*7 to 4.2 K.

     Intense phosphorescence at room temperature has been observed from
various salts of polyaromatic compounds (FACs) adsorbed on solid supports,
such as silica, alumina, paper, and  asbestos (Shulman and Hailing, 1972; Vo-
Dinh, 1984).  This type of phosphorescence is assumed to originate from
surface-adsorbed molecules, because  none could be observed from finely ground
samples of free crystalline compounds.  Numerous ionic compounds were found to
show strong phosphorescence, especially when they were spotted onto substrates
following dissolution in strongly acidic or basic solvents.  As a consequence,
the ionic state of the molecules may have resulted in an increased molecular
rigidity via adsorption to the substrate, thus reducing the effect of
collisional deactivation.  Hydrogen  bonding was also found to be responsible
for phosphorescence of adsorbed compounds at room temperature.

     Unlike conventional phosphorimetry, RTP does not require cryogenic equip-
ment and involves simple experimental  steps such as:  (1)  substrate
                                      34

-------
preparation  (optional pretreatment).  (2)  sample delivery, (3) drying process,
and  (4) spectroscopic measurement.

     The  versatility of  sampling procedures is one of the main advantages of
the  method.   Various sample collection methods are possible, including
spotting, leaching,  swipe techniques, and liquid  filtration.  The use of
filter paper or filter membranes as direct sample support broadens  the type of
samples that can be monitored and is advantageous in performance,
reproducibility, convenience and low cost.

      Although some luminescent chemicals such as  PCBs  have  higher phosphor-
escence than fluorescence quantum yields, others  such as PAHs  require  the
enhancement of the triplet emission by the external heavy atom effect, which
perturbs the electronic  levels of the analyte and hence increases  ISC  between
 the singlet and triplet  states,  leading  to enhanced phosphorescence.  Numerous
 heavy  atom  salts such as thallium and lead acetate, silver perchlorate,  cesium
 or methyl iodide and sodium bromide  have been found to be efficient in
 enhancing the  phosphorescence quantum yields of  PAHs selectively (Vo-Dinh and
 Hooyman,  1978).  RTP signals can be  selectively  enhanced by several orders of
 magnitude by pretreating the matrix or  premixing the sample with the heavy
 atom  perturber.

       Two types of  external heavy-atom perturbers are commonly used for RTP.
 Type  A perturbers  such  as thallium acetate form  phosphorescent  ground state
 charge-transfer complexes with the aromatic compound.   Type B perturbers such
 as methyl iodide do not associate with the compound.   Type B perturbers
 normally give multi-exponential decay curves,  whereas  Type A perturbers,
 depending on the concentration of the perturber, will give mono- or bi-
  exponential decay curves.  Because the  perturbers not only increase the
  phosphorescence quantum yields but do so with different enhancement factors,
  depending  on  perturbers used and their  concentrations, the selectivity  of  the
                                         35

-------
technique  can be  increased.   (Vo-Dinh and Hooyman,  1978; Jakovljevic,  1978;
White  and  Seybold,  1977).

     synchronous  phosphorescence may also be used with the optimum AX
determined by the singlet-triplet energy difference, which might range from
100 to 300 ran.

     These RTP  techniques  have been successfully used to analyze for indi-
vidual chemicals  in complex  environmental mixtures  containing polyaromatic
hydrocarbons  such as benzo(a)pyrene,  benzo(e)pyrene, chrysene, fluoranthene,
fluorene,  pyrene  and phenanthrene.   (Vo-Dinh,  1984; cline-Love and Skrilec,
1982;  Bower and Winefordner,  1978;  Ford  and Hurtubise, 1979).

CHEMILUMINESCENCE

     Chemiluminescence occurs  when  a  chemical  reaction produces an electron-
ically excited  state to emit  light  on returning to  the ground state.  As
recently shown  by Fernandez-Gutierrez and Kunoz de  la Pena in Schulman (1985),
the Chemiluminescence intensity can be expressed as:

     where:
     Z = rate  of the chemical reaction
     4>a = Chemiluminescence quantum yield of the excited product

                              number of emitted photons
                            number of reacting molecules
     Chemiluminescence can be measured as a function of time with the maximum
intensity usually proportional to the concentration of analyte,  or by mixing
the reactants in a flowing system.

-------
      Usually, for inorganic analyses, concentrations between UP* and 10'*
       can be measured, requiring relatively simple equipment,  chemilurain-
escence has been most often used for biochemical analyses,  such as adenosine
triphosphate (ATP) using the oxidation of luciferin catalyzed by the
luciferase enzyme, or for air pollutant analysis.  The development of ehemi-
luminescence for analytical purposes has been limited because few molecules
demonstrate this phenomenon in solution and also chemiluminescence methods
tend not to be very selective.  Chemiluminescence reactions may be catalyzed
by  low levels of ions.  Chemiluminescence assays have therefore been developed
for ions such as Cu1* and Co1* based on their catalytic effect on the oxidation
of  luminol.   several other inorganic ions or gases have also been determined
by  chemiluminescence methods involving luminol or luciferin.

CONCLUSIONS

      uv-vis  luminescence (fluorescence and phosphorescence),  when applicable,
is  potentially the most sensitive  spectroscopic analytical  method,  especially
when laser excitation is available.   Therefore,  luminescence is  the method of
choice  for field use for trace or  ultratrace  analysis  for classes of
pollutants with appreciable luminescence yields,  such  as most polyaromatic
compounds  (PACs),  both aromatic and  heterocyclic.   At  higher levels, or where
extensive  sample preparation is needed,  other methods  become competitive with
luminescence.   Luminescence is especially applicable for water samples, where
little  or  no  sample preparation may  be involved,  and for real-time flow-
through applications either direct or with BPLC multichannel  detection.

     As  compared to uv-vis  absorption,  luminescence is potentially more
sensitive  and subject to fewer interferences.  As compared  to infrared and
Raman,  this technique is more  sensitive,  but  spectra are less specific and
structured,  vibrational structure in luminescence  spectra  ia found, however,
for  certain classes of compounds such as  PAHs.  Additional  spectral structure
                                      37

-------
can be  introduced by use of rigid media,  low temperature,  site-selective laser
excitation,  or  derivative techniques.   Specificity  in complex mixtures without
separatory or chromatographic  procedures  can be  improved by techniques such as
synchronous  luminescence, luminescence  lifetime  techniques or special low
temperature  methods.

     Fluorometric reagents can be extremely  sensitive and  specific, but many
have the  same problems  as colorimetric  reagents, namely interferences, lack of
specificity,  and  chemical instability,  especially for use with fluorometric
fiber-optic  sensors.  Other possible disadvantages  include fluorescence
background such as that from fulvic or  humic  acids, scatter from excitation
light,  quenching,  or  self-absorption.   Quenching and self-absorption can
usually be avoided by dilution and scatter can be minimized by use of RTP,
life-time discrimination, or appropriate  filters.   Fluorescence from fulvic or
humic acids  is  usually  a problem  only at  the  low ppb level and then could be
avoided by separatory methods, time-resolved  techniques, or background
subtraction.

     Field-deployable scanning and filter spectrofluorometers have been
available and in  use  for some  time, primarily for petroleum oil and PAH
analyses, and by  hydrologists  who use fluorescent dyes to trace ground water
movement.  At least one portable  fluorescence instrument has been developed,
and another portable  spectrofluorometer with a fiber optic probe and
synchronous capability  is under development.  The main obstacle has been the
apparent  lack of  a market,  because, until recently,  attention was not focused
on thia promising technique for environmental applications.  Now ASTM and EPA
analytical methods are  being developed for PAHs, PCBs,  and phenols, which
should  stimulate  the  use of luminescence  in environmental analysis.

     Classes  of compounds for which fluorescence is  especially applicable
include petroleum oils  and PAHs.   Fluorescence has also been found useful for
                                      38

-------
 other polyaromatic compounds including phenols, some pesticides and
 heterocycles.  RTF is potentially applicable to important pollutants such as
 PCBs and PBBs, and chlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans.

      For field use, fluorescence can be used to characterize oils  and
 creosotes, quantitate total PAHs and rank relative amounts of different  PAH
 classes using synchronous techniques.  PCBS and some pesticides can be
 detected and quantitated by RTF, possibly in conjunction with thin layer
 chromatography 
-------
procedures.   Research efforts are also desirable to advance several of these
promising  low-temperature approaches.

     Chemiluminescence is a sensitive but specialized technique that should be
utilized along with other luminescence procedures, when applicable.

     Analytical protocols need to be developed for more naturally fluorescing
species and better fluorometric reagents for nonfluorescing species,
especially for use with spot tests for field instruments and for fiber optic
chemical sensors  (FOCS).  Better portable spectrofluorometers need to be
developed  with capability for synchronous measurements.  Also needed are
smaller lasers (the development of which is proceeding rapidly), especially
for the UV range, better UV optical fibers having higher transmittance in the
UV, miniaturized  sources, and other optical components.  More research is
needed in  solid surface spectroscopy to better understand the theory in order
to optimize experimental conditions and improve phosphorescence yields for
RTF.

-------
                                   REFERENCES


     This reference  section contains  all  references cited and  an additional
selection of definitive  references that should provide the reader with a basic
understanding of ultraviolet-visible  luminescence  apectroscopy.


Abbott, 0. W., Moody, R.  L.,  Mann,  R.  M.,  and  Vo-Dinh, T., Amer. ind. Byg.
Assoc. J., Vol. 47,  1986,  p 379.

Alak, A. M., contolini,  N.,  and Vo-Dinh,  T., "studies of eyelodextrin-Enhanced
Room-Temperature Phosphorescence," Anal.  Chin. Acta, Vol. 217, 1989, pp 171-
176.

ASTH, "Standard Practice for identification of chemicals in Hater by
Fluorescence Spectroscopy" Annual  Book of ASTH Standards, American Society for
Testing and Materials, Philadelphia,  D 4763-88, Vol. 11.02, 1988.

ASTM, "Standard Method for Comparison of  Waterborne Petroleum  Oils by
Fluorescence Analysis,*  Annual  Book of ASTH Standards, American Society for
Testing and Materials, Philadelphia,  D3650-78  (Reapproved 1982), Vol. 11.02,
1988.

Becker, R. S.; Theory and Interpretation  of Fluorescence and Phosphorescence;
Wiley Interscience,  New  York; 1969.

Berlman, I., Handbook of Fluorescence Spectra  of Aromatic Molecules, second
Edition, Academic Press,  NY,  1971.

Bilhorn, R. B., Epperson,  P.  M., Sweedler, J.  V., and Denton,  H. B.,
"Spectrochemical Measurements with Multichannel integrating Detectors,* Appl.
Spectrosc., Vol. 41, No.  7,  1987,  pp  1125-1136.

Bilhorn, R. B., Sweedler,  J.  V., Epperson, P.  M., Denton, M. B., "Charge
Transfer Device Detectors  for Analytical  optical Spectroscopy  - Operation and
Characteristics," Appl.  Spectrosc., Vol.  41, No. 7, 1987, pp 1114-1124.

Birks, J. B., Photophysics of Aromatic Molecules. John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1970.

Bower, L. T. and Winefordner, J. D.,  Anal. Chim. Acta, Vol. 102, 1978, p 1.

Brownrigg, J. T., Bushch,  D.  A., and  Giering,  L. P., "A Luminescence survey of
Hazardous Materials,* Report  No. CG-D-53-79, Prepared by Baird Corporation
Under Contract DOT-CG-91-78-1888,  May 1979.

Burgess, L. W., Fun, M.R.S.,  and Christian, G., "Use of Analytical
Fluorescence with Fiber  Optics," Progress  in Analytical Luminescence, ASTM STP
1009, D. Eastwood and L. J. Cline  Love, Eds., American Society for Testing and
Materials, Philadelphia,  1988,  pp  100-110.

Bushaw, B. A., "Kimetic  Analysis of Laser  Induced Phosphorescence in Uranyl
Phosphate for Improved Analytical  Measurements,* Presented at  the 26th Oak
Ridge Conference on  Analytical  chemistry  in Energy Technology, Knoxville,  TN,
1983.
                                      41

-------
Burns, D. H.f callis, J.  B.,  and Christian, G. D.,  "Multidimensional Detection
and Analysis in  Thin-Layer Chromatography," Trends  in Analytical Chemistry,
Vol. 5, No. 2, 1986, pp  50-52.

Chisholm, B. R.,  Eldering, H. G., Giering, L. P., and Hornig, A. w., "Total
Luminescence Contour spectra  of Six Topped Crude Oils," BRDA, Baird-Atomic,
inc.,  1976, pp 1-42.

Christian, G. D.,  Callis,  J.  B., and Davidson, E. R., in Modern Fluorescence
spectroscopy; vol.  4. E.  L. Wehry, Ed.,  Plenum, NY,  1981, pp  111-165.

cline-Love, L. J.  and Eastwood, D., Ed., Advances in Luminescence
speetroacopv. ASTM STP  863, American Society  for Testing and  Materials,
Philadelphia,  1985.

Cline-Love, L. J.  and Skrilec, M., Anal. Chem., Vol. 53, 1981,
p 2103.

Cline-Love, L. J.  and Skrilec, M. in solution Behaviour of  surfactants. Vol.
2, K.  L.  Milton  and E.  J. Fendler, Eds., Plenum, NY, 1982,  p  1065.

cobb,  W.  T., McGown, L.  B., "On-Line Fluorescence Lifetime  Detection for
Chromatographic  Peak Resolution," Anal.  Chem., in press.

Cobb,  W.  T., McGown, L.  B., "Multifrequency Phase-Modulation  Fluorescence
Lifetime  Determinations On-the-Fly in  HPLC,"  Appl.  Spectrosc., Vol. 43, No. 8,
1989,  pp  1363-1367.

Cobb,  w.  T., McGown, L.  B., "Phase-Modulation Fluorometry for On-Line Liquid
Chromatographic  Detection and Analysis of  Mixtures  of Benzo (k) Fluoranthene
and  Benzo (b)  Fluoranthene,"  Appl. Spectrosc., Vol. 41, No. 8,  1987, pp 1275-
1279.

Cobb,  W.  T., Nithipatikom, K.,  and McGown, L. B.,  "Multicomponent  Detection
and  Determination of  Polycyclic  Aromatic Hydrocarbons Using HPLC and a Phase-
Modulation spectrofluorometer,"  Special Technical  Publication 1009, American
Society for Testing and Materials,  1988, pp  12-25.

Eastwood, D.,  Lidberg,  R. L., and Gibson,  G., "Standard Test Method for the
Characterization and Quantitation of Complex PAH Mixtures or Petroleum Oils in
Water or Soil,*  a draft EPA document,  1989.

Eastwood, D.,  "Use of Luminescence  Spectroscopy  in Oil  Identification," in
Modern Fluorescence spectroscopy. Vol. 4,
E. L.  Wehry,  Ed.,  1981, pp 251-275.

Eastwood, D.,  Lidberg,  R. L., Simon, s. J.,  and  Vo-Dinh, T.,  "An overview  of
Advanced spectroscopic Field screening and in-Situ Monitoring Instrumentation
and Methods,"  Proceedings, 7th International Conference on  Chemistry for the
Protection of the Environment, Lublin, Poland, 1989.

Eastwood, D.  and Lidberg, R.  L., "Application of Fluorescence and  FT-IR
Techniques for Screening  and Classifying Hazardous Waste Samples,"
Proceedings,  7th National Conference  on Management of  Uncontrolled Hazardous
Waste Sites,  Washington,  D.C., 1989,
p 370.            *

Eastwood, D.,  Ed., New Directions in Molecular Luminescence.  ASTM  STP  822,
American Society for Testing and Materials,  Philadelphia,  1983.

Eastwood, D. and Cline-Love, L. J.,  Ed., Progress in Analytical Luminescence.
ASTM STP 1009, American Society for Testing and Materials,  Philadelphia,  1988.


                                       42

-------
Ekambaram, V., and Burch,  J.  B.,  "High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph aa a
viable Field screening Method for Hazardous Haste site Investigations,"
Proceedings First International  symposium on Field screen Methods for
Hazardous Haste Site Investigations, Las Vegas, NV, 1988, pp 361-363.

Environmental Systems Corporation, Luminoscope Model L-101, Technical
Brochure, Knoxville, TN,  1988.

Epperson, P. M., Sweedler,  J. V., Bilhorn, R. B., Sims, G. R., and Denton, M.
B., "Applications of charge Transfer Devices in Spectroscopy,"
Instrumentation, ACS, 1988.

Epperson, P. M., Jalkian,  R.  D.,  and Denton, M. B., "Molecular Fluorescence
Measurements with a charge-Coupled Device Detector," Anal. chem., Vol. 61,
1989, pp 282-285.

Femia, R. A., Scypinski,  S.,  and Cline-Love, L. J., "Fluorescence
Characteristics of Polychlorinated Biphenyl laomers in Cyclodextrin Media,*
Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol.  19,  No. 2,  1985, pp 155-159.

Fernandez-Gutierrez, A. and Munoz de la  Pena, A., "Determination of Inorganic
Substances by Luminescence Methods," in  Molecular Luminescence Spectroscopy.
Part  1. S. G. Schulman, Ed.,  John Hiley  & Sons, 1985, pp 371-546.

Ford, C. D. and Hurtubise,  R. J., Anal.  Chem., Vol. 51, 1979,
p  659.

Futoma, D. J., Smith, S.  R.,  and Tanaka, J., "Spectroscopic Methods of
Analysis for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the Aqueous Environment," in
Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, Vol. 13,
Issue 3, pp 117-154.

Futoma, D. J, Smith, S. R., Smith, T.  E., and Tanaka, J., "Polycyclic Aromatic
Hydrocarbons in Hater Systems,"  CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL,  1981.

Green, G. L., and O'Haver,  T. C., Anal.  Chem., Vol. 46, 1974,
p  2191.

Hinze, H. L., Singh, H. M., Baba, Y.,  and Harvey, N. G., "Micellar Enhanced
Analytical Fluorimetry,"  Trends in Analytical chemistry, Elsevier, NY, Vol.  3,
No.  8,  1984, pp  193-199.

Hurtubise, R. J.,  "Solid-Surface Luminescence Spectroaetry," Anal. Chem., Vol.
61,  No.  15,  1989, pp  889-895.

Jackovljevic, I. M., Anal. Chem., Vol. 49.,  1978, p 2048.

Kaminski,  R., Purcell,  F. J., and Russavage, E.,  "Uranyl Phosphorescence  at
the  Parts-per-Trillion  Level," Anal.  Chem.,  Vol.  53,  1981,  p  1093.

Khasawneh,  I. M., Chamsaz, M., and Hinefordner, J. D.,  "Effect of Several
Heavy-Atoms  on  Room Temperature Phosphorescence of Biphenyl and  Several
Polychlorinated Biphenyls on Filter  Paper."  Analytical Letters, 21(1),  1988,
pp 125-144.

Khasawneh,  I. M.  arid Hinefordner, J.  D.  "Effect of Acetic Acid Upon the Room
Temperature Fluorescence and Low Temperature Phosphorescence of  Benzoic Acid
and Halogen-Substituted Benzoic Acids,"  Canadian Journal of Spectroscopy,
vol. 31,  No.  3,  1986.

Kubic,  T.  A.,  Kanabrocki, T., and Dwyer, J., Presented  Paper at  American
Academy of Forensic Sciences, 32nd Annual Meeting,  1980.


                                       43

-------
Law, R. J., Marchand, M.,  Dahlmann, G., Fileman, T. W., "Results of Two
Bilateral Comparisons of the  Determination of Hydrocarbon Concentrations in
Coastal Seawater by Fluorescence Spectroscopy," in Marine Pollution Bulletin,
Vol. 18, NO. 9, 1987, pp 486-489.

Lloyd, J.B.F., Analyst, Vol.  99,  1974, p  729.

Lloyd, J.B.F., J. Forens.  Sci.  Soc., Vol. 11, 1971, pp 83, 135, 153.

Lloyd, J.B.F., "Packed Flow-through Cell  Technique for the Measurement of the
Room-Temperature Phosphorescence Spectra  of Adsorbed Compounds," Analyst, Vol.
103, 1978, pp 775-776.

Lyons, J. w., Hardesty, P.  T.,  Baer, c. s., and Faulkner, L. R., "structural
Interpretation of Fluorescence  Spectra by Automated File Searching:
Implementation and Applications in Liquid Chromatography,* Chapter 1, Modern
Fluorescence Spectroscopy.  Vol. 3. E. L.  Wehry, Ed., Plenum, NY, 1981, pp 1-
32.

McGown, L. B., and Nithipatikon,  K., "Phase-Resolved Fluorescence
Spectroscopy,* Chapter 7 in Chemical Analysis of Polvcvclic Aromatic
Compounds. T. Vo-Oinh, Ed., John Wiley &  Sons, NY, 1989, pp 201-218.

McKinney, G. L., Lau, H. K. Y.  and Lott,  P. F., "A Rapid Fluorometric
Determination of Cyanide,"  Microchem J.,  Vol 17, 1972, pp 375-379.

Miller, J. N., Ed.; standards in Fluorescence Spectrometry; Chapman and Hall,
London, 1981.

Miller, J. N., Phillipps,  D.  L.,  Burns, D. T., and Bridges, J. w., "Solvent
Enhancement Effects in Thin-Layer Phosphorimetry," Anal. Chem., Vol. 50, No.
4, 1978, pp 613-616.

Montgomery, R. £., Remeta,  D. P.,  and Gruenfeld, M., "Rapid On-site Methods of
Chemical Analysis," in Contaminated Land. M. A. Smith, Ed., Plenum, NY, 1985,
Chapter II, pp 257-309.

Motwani, J. N., Popp, S. A.,  Johnson, G.  M., Mindock, R. A., "Field Screening
Techniques Developed Under  the  Superfund  Program," Proceedings Superfund '86
Conference, Washington, DC, 1986.

O'Donnell, C. M., and Suffin, S.  C., "Fluorescence Immunoassays," Anal. Chem.,
Vol. 51, No. 1, 1979, pp 33-40.

O'Donnell, C. M., Harbough, K.  F., and winefordner, J. D., "The Internal Heavy
Atom Effect in HalobiphenyIs,"  Spectrochim. Acta, Part A, Vol. 29A, 1973, pp
753-754.

oldham, P. B., Patonay, G., and Warner, I. M., "A Microprocessor-Controlled,
Multichannel Fluorimeter for  Analysis of  Sea Water," Anal. chim. Acta, 158,
1984, pp 277-285.

Parker, C. A., Photoluminescence of solutions with Applications to
Photochemistry and Analytical Chemistry;  Elsevier; London, 1968.

Paynter, R. A., Wellons, S. L., and Winefordner, J. D., "New Method of
Analysis Based on Room-Temperature Phosphorescence," Anal. Chem., vol. 46,  No.
6, 1974, pp 736-738.

Perry, L. M., Campiglia, A. D., and winefordner, J. D., "Room-Temperature
Phosphorescence of Polynuclear  Aromatic Hydrocarbons on Matrix-Modified Solid
Substrates," Anal. Chem., Vol.  61, No. 15, 1989, pp 2328-2330.


                                      44

-------
Purcell, F. J., Kaminski,  R.,  and obenauf, R. H., "Synchronous-
Excitation Fluorescence Applied to characterization of Phenolic Species," in
Advances in Luminescence  Spectroscopv. L. J. Cline-Love and D. Eastwood, Eds.,
ASTM, Philadelphia,  PA,  1985,
pp 81-94.

Ramos, G. R., Garcia Alvarez-Coque, M. C., Berthed, A., and Winefordner, J.
D., "Fluorescence  in Microemulsions and Reversed Micelles:  A Review and New
Results," Anal. Chim.  Acta,  208,  1988, pp 1-19.

Ramos, G. R., Garcia Alvarez-Coque, M. C., O'Reilly, A. M., Khasawneh, I. M.,
and Winefordner, J.  D.,  "Paper substrate Room-Temperature  Phosphorimetry of
Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons Enhanced by Surface-Active Agents," Anal. Chem., 60,
1988, pp 416-420.

Ramos, G. R., Khasawneh,  I.  M., Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, M. C., and Winefordner,
J. D., "Room-Temperature  Phosphorimetry of Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons with
organized Media and Paper Substrate:  A Comparative Study," Talanta, Vol. 35,
No. 1, 1988, pp 41-46.

Remeta, D. P. and  Gruenfeld, M.,  Eds., Emergency Response  Analytical Methods
for Use on Board Mobile  Laboratories. section I, Method 1.7, "Rapid In Situ
Analysis of Hazardous Materials in Aqueous Samples by Fluorescence
Spectroscopy", U.S.E.P.A., Edison, NJ, Draft, 1987.

Schulman, S. G., Ed., Molecular Luminescence Spectroscopv; Methods and
Applications; Part 1. John Wiley  & Sons, NY, 1985.

Schulman, S. G., Ed., Molecular Luminescence Spectroscopv; Methods and
Applications; Part 2. John Wiley  & Sons, NY, 1988.

scypinski, s., and Cline-Love, L. J.,  "Room-Temperature Phosphorescence of
Polynuclear Aromatic Hydrocarbons in cyclodextrins," Anal. Chem., Vol. 56, No.
3,  1984, pp  322-327.

Shimadzu,  shimadzu Application Data  (brochure), RF Spectrophotometry 3,
"Simultaneous Determination of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons by Synchronous
Excitation Spectroscopy;  Determination of Perylene, Anthracene, Fluorene, and
Carbazole,"  shimadzu corporation, no date.

Shulman,  E.  M.  and Walling, C., Science, Vol.  178,  1972, p 53.

Siegel,  N.  and  Haug, A., "Aluminum  Interaction with Calmodulin - Evidence for
Altered Structure and Function from Optical  And Enzymatic  Studies," Biochimica
et Biophysica Acta, Vol 744, 1983,  pp 36-45.

Sogliero,  G.,  Eastwood,  D., and Ehmer,  R.,  "Some  Pattern Recognition
Considerations  for Low Temperature  Luminescence  and Room Temperature
Fluorescence Spectra," Appl. Spectrosc.,  Vol.  36,  1981, p  110.

sogliero,  G.,  Eastwood,  D., and Gilbert,  J., "A  Concise Feature Set for the
Pattern Recognition of Low Temperature Luminescence Spectra  of Hazardous
chemicals,"  In Advances in Luminescence speetroseopv.  L. J.  Cline-Love and D.
Eastwood,  Eds.,  ASTM  STP 863, ASTM,  Philadelphia,  PA,  1985,  p  95.

SPEX industries,  Tech Note F-10,  Fluorescence,  "Screening  and  classifying
Hazardous waste Samples with Fluorescence Spectroscopy," no  date.

U.S.  EPA,  Field screening Methods Catalog,  FM-D5,  "Use of  Fiber Optic Sensors
 in Environmental Monitoring," U.S.E.P.A.,  Washington,  DC,  1987, p  63.
                                       45

-------
U.S. EPA, Field Screening Methods Catalog, FM-26, "Total PNA Analysis Using an
Ultraviolet Fluorescence spectrophotometer, U.S. EPA, Washington, DC, 1987, p
51.

U.S. Coast Guard,  "Oil Spill Identification systems," U.S. coast Guard
Research and Development Center Report No. DOT-CG-D-52-77, 1977.

vo-Dinh, T., and Abbott, D. W. "A Ranking  Index to Characterize Polynuclear
Aromatic Pollutants  in Environmental samples" Environment International, vol.
10, 1984, pp 299-304.

Vo-Dinh, T. and Hooyman, J. R., Anal. Chem., Vol. 50, 1978,
p 2054.

Vo-Dinh, T., "Rapid  screening Luminescence Techniques for Trace organic
Analysis," New Directions in Molecular t-mninescence. ASTM STP 822, D.
Eastwood, Ed., American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1983,
pp  5-16.

Vo-Dinh, T., Room  Temperature Phosphorimetry for Chemical Analysis. John Wiley
6 Sons, NY,  1984.

Vo-Dinh, T., -Synchronous Excitation Spectroscopy,"  in Modern Fluorescence
speetroscopv.  Vol. 4. E. L. Wehry, Ed.,  Plenum, NY,  Chapter 5,  1981, pp 167-
192.

Vo-Dinh, T.  and White, D. A., Anal. Chem., Vol. 58, -1986, p 1128.

Vo-Dinh, T., Anal. Chem., Vol. 50, 1978, p 396.

Warner,  I. M., Fogarty, M.  P., and Shelly, D. C., "Design Considerations for a
Two-Dimensional Rapid scanning Fluorimeter," Anal. Chim. Acta,  Vol. 109, 1979,
pp  361-372.

Warner,  I. M., Patonay, G.,  and Thomas,  M. P.,  "Multi-Dimensional Luminescence
Measurements," Anal. Chem.,  Vol.  57, No.  3,  1985, pp 463-483.

Warner,  I. M.  Patonay, G.,  Rollie, M.  E.,  Thomas, M., and Nelson, G.,
•optimization  of Fluorescence Measurements," Progress in Analytical
Luminescence,  ASTM STP  1009, D. Eastwood and L. J. Cline Love,  Eds. American
Society for  Testing and Materials, Philadelphia,  1988, pp  1-11.

Wehry,  E.  L.,  "Molecular  Fluorescence,  Phosphorescence, and chemiluminescence
Spectrometry," Anal. Chem.,  Vol.  58, No.  5,  1986, pp 13-33.

Wehry,  E.  L.,  Ed., Modern Fluorescence Spectroaeopy; Vols. 3 and 4, Plenum,
NY, 1981.

Weinberger,  R. and Cline-Love, L. J.,  "Luminescence  Properties  of Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons in  colloidal or  Macrocrystalline Suspensions,"
Spectrochim. Acta, Part A,  Vol.  40A, No. 1,  1984, pp 49-55.

Winefordner, J.  D. and Voigtman,  E.,  "Laser-Excited  Fluorescence,
Photoacoustic, and Photoionization Detection of Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons  and
Drugs," New Directions  in Molecular  Luminescence, ASTM STP 822, D. Eastwood,
Ed.,  American Society for Testing and  Materials,  Philadelphia,  1983, pp 17-31.

Weinberger,  R.,  Rembish,  K., and Cline-Love, L.  J.,  "Comparison of Techniques
 for Generating Room Temperature  phosphorescence in Fluid  Solution," Advances
 in Luminescence Spectroscopy,  ASTM STP 863,  L.  J. Cline-Love and D. Eastwood,
Eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, 1985, pp 40-51.
                                       46

-------
white, H. and seybold, P. G., J. Phys. chem., Vol. 81, 1977,
p 2035.

Zander, M.,  "Ultraviolet Absorption and Luminescence Spectrometry: an Overview
of Recent Developments," Chapter 6 in  chemical Analvaia of Polvcyelic
Aromatic Compounds. T. Vo-Dinh, Ed., John Wiley £ Sons, NY, 1989, pp 171-200.
                                       47

-------
                                   SECTION 5
                       INFRARED ABSORPTION  SPECTROSCOPE
INTRODUCTION
     Vibrational  apectroscopy has traditionally been of importance for
qualitative  identification because of its specificity.  Many sharp peaks may
be present in vibrational spectra, which can be related to molecular
structure.   The frequencies of most molecular vibrations occur generally in
the infrared region of the electromagnetic  spectrum.  These vibrations may be
detected and measured either directly in an infrared (IR) spectrum or indi-
rectly  in a  Raman inelastic scattering  spectrum.
THEORY
  Quantum mechanical selection rules permit only discrete vibrational energy
levels.   The selection rule for a vibration to be infrared active is that the
vibration must result in a change in the  electric dipole moment.  The number
of modes of vibration is (3N - 6) for  a molecule consisting of N atoms  (3N - 5
if the molecule is linear).  For large molecules there are thus many
vibrational transitions.  Many vibrations can, however, be localized to
particular bonds or groupings, such as the -C=O  (carbonyl) group, forming the
basis of characteristic group frequencies. Also, vibrational modes are
observed relating to the skeletal vibrations  of the molecule.

      A simplified example can be given for a  diatomic molecule  (with 2 atoms
of mass nij and m,) connected by an elastic spring with force constant k.  This
system can be considered to represent  a harmonic oscillator in the classical
                                       48

-------
physics approach.  According  to this model, the vibrational frequency v of the
bond connecting the two atoms can be approximately described by the formula:
                                  ""   2/r
     where:
     k = force constant of the spring
     u = reduced mass of the molecule
     A quantum mechanical  treatment of  the  same system will  show that a
harmonic oscillator will have the  energy  levels E, given by E, - (v+l/2)hv,
where v =  0,1,2,3...  is the vibrational quantum number, h  is Planck's constant
and v is the classical vibrational frequency of the harmonic oscillator.  The
vibrational selection rules are v  = 0 or  ±  1.  In the real world, oscillators
               k
will be found to  have anharmonic components, which can be  thought of, in the
classical  physics approach, as due to inelasticity or friction in the spring.
See treatment in  Griffiths and de  Haseth  (1986).

INSTRUMENTATION

     A common dispersive grating instrument for measuring  IR spectra is the
double-beam spectrophotometer.  The light source is usually  a heated filament
(or metal  carbide rod) that emits  a continuous spectrum of a "black body"
exhibiting considerable  intensity  in the  IR region.  The excitation beam is
split in two with one beam passing through the sample and  the other through a
reference  cell.   Both beams then pass through a chopper, which allows altern-
ate sampling of the  two  beams.  These beams then pass through a monochromator
to the detector,  which measures the difference in  intensities between the two
beams.  Two types of infrared detectors have been  commonly used: quantum
detectors  and  thermal detectors such  as the Golay  detector and the
                                       49

-------
pyroelectric bolometer.  Because thermal detectors respond relatively slowly,
solid-state semiconductor quantum detectors such as mercury cadmium telluride
(MCT) or PbS and PbSe are increasingly used. For good sensitivity, lead
sulfide must be chilled with a thermoelectric cooler below ambient
temperature, and NCT must be maintained at 77 K.

     An ZR spectrum usually consists of a plot of the absorbance as a function
of wavenumber  (cm*1 )  and is characterized by the positions of the maxima of
each of the absorption bands VM expressed in cm"1 .   Within the ZR region of
the spectrum,  the range from 1400 to 4000 cm*1 is  especially useful for
identifying frequencies for characteristic groups, e.g.,  -c=o.  The region
from 600 to 1400 cm*1  contains many bands, including those from skeletal
vibrations, so that it is especially useful for  "fingerprinting" of aliphatic
and aromatic hydrocarbons and petroleum oils.  Dispersive mid-ZR spectroscopy
has long been  used by organic chemists for structural determinations.  Zts use
as an analytical procedure has never been fully developed due mainly to its
                     /
lack of sensitivity.  Qualitative (e.g., for oil identification, Grant and
Eastwood, 1983) and a few specific quantitative  (e.g., oil and grease) methods
have already been employed for field use.

     The near  ZR region from roughly 780 nm to  1600 nm (12,800 to 6250 cm"1)
contains many  broad, overlapping harmonic and overtone peaks.  Computer
pattern recognition and signal processing techniques are  used to deconvolute
the broad spectral peaks.  This spectral region has recently proven useful for
process control and for monitoring selected environmental pollutants
(including the use of near ZR sensors), but would prove less useful for trace
analysis, because it is sensitive only to major components, down to 1 to  0.1%.

     The specificity of ZR is an advantage in comparison  with UV-vis absorp-
tion and luminescence spectroscopies.  Disadvantages include relatively low
sensitivity due to relatively weak bands, the fact that ZR band strengths may
                                       50

-------
not appear to be directly proportional to concentration  if  measurements  are
made  at  low spectral resolution,  and special optical  and solvent requirements.
In particular, absorption bands of water in IR spectra are  a  serious
limitation of this technique for trace analysis for hazardous waste
applications.  FTIR spectral subtraction techniques using a circle cell  can be
used  down to the part per thousand level in water, but often  ppm or lower is
desired.

FOURIER  TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY

      Fourier transform IR (FTIR)  spectroscopy uses an interferometer in
conjunction with Fourier transform mathematical techniques  and a dedicated
computer.   This technique is especially useful for real-time  or  flow-through
gas phase measurements although it is  also applicable to  solids,  films and
liquids.

      The  theory behind FTIR was discussed by Griffiths and  de Baseth (1986).
Most  interferometers are based on the  same principle as the Hichelson
interferometer,  which divides a beam of light into two parts  and recombines
them  after a path difference has  introduced interference between the beams.
Intensity variations can be measured by the detector as a function of path
difference.   The interferometer consists of two plane mirrors, one of which is
moved with a drive mechanism in a direction perpendicular to  the plane of the
other fixed mirror,  with a beam splitter between them.

      For  a monochromatic light source,  the theory can be described briefly as
follows:   The optical path difference  between the beams introduced by the
fixed and movable mirrors is called  the retardation 6.  The amplitude of the
interferogram after  detection and amplification is proportional to the
intensity  of  the source,  the beam splitter efficiency, the detector response,
and the amplifier characteristics.
                                      51

-------
     1(5) is the modulated ac component of  the intensity,  usually called the
interferogram.
     For a monochromatic source and an ideal  interferometer,  the  equation for
the interferogram  ia:

                             1(6) = 0.5l(7)Cos2/rv6

     For a polychromatic source and a  nonideal interferometer, where the
beamsplitter efficiency,  detector efficiency,  etc. are given  as a function of
wavelength, 1(6) can be expressed as:

                           1(6} = 0.5H(v> I(v)Cos2;iv6

     vhere: H(7) - wavelength-dependent correction factor

     B(v") is the parameter describing  the intensity of the source as a
function of wavenumber  v  as modified by  the instrumental characteristics.
               B(v") = 0.58(7)1(7)  = single beam spectral intensity
     so that:
                               1(5)  =» B(v*)Cos2TnT6

     where: 1(6) =  cosine Fourier transform of B(v")

     Usually, the  moving mirror ia  scanned at  a constant velocity, v (cm/sec)
so that the retardation at t seconds can be thought of as:
                                    6 = 2vt
     then:
For a continuous polychromatic source:

                                                 d6
                                      52

-------
Other factors as discussed by Griffiths and de Haseth (1986) include
resolution, phase errors, and beam divergence.

     The simultaneous measurement of all spectral elements by an
interferometer is called the mutiplex or Fellgett's advantage, allowing for
rapid spectral acquisition.  The mutiplex advantage can be expressed as a
sensitivity advantage, comparing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of a spectrum
measured on a Fourier transform instrument to the SNR of the same spectra on a
dispersive spectrometer.  If the resolution, acquisition time, and all other
instrumental conditions are equivalent, the SNR for the FT instrument will be
increased by a factor equal to  tf,  where M is the number of resolution
elements assuming detector dark noise is dominant.  The time advantage of an
FT  spectrometer, allowing complete spectra to be recorded in milliseconds, is
even greater, being directly proportional to M.  A smaller advantage is
Jaquinot'3 advantage, which stems from  increased throughput of Fourier
spectrometers as compared to IR grating spectrometers.  The increased
throughput is dependent on the  optics and resolution used, so that the total
advantage of the FTIR over dispersive instruments is small in this regard.
Another, the Connes advantage,  is that  the IR spectral  frequency in the FTIR
is  precisely referenced by  laser lines. This feature enables the spectra to
be  independent of the instrument and useful  for  interlaboratory comparison and
spectral library collection.

     Griffiths and  coworkers have compared FT and grating  IR spectrophoto-
meters  from  a theoretical  viewpoint in  terms of  the multiplex advantage of FT
spectrometers, relative optical throughput,  and  the comparative performance of
the detectors used  with each  type of system  (Griffiths  et  al.,  1977).

     Recently, FTIR, especially used as GC-FTIR  for complex environmental
samples, has become accepted as a  laboratory technique.  Gurka  (1988) has
developed  standard  protocols  for EPA analytical  applications.
                                       S3

-------
     For satisfactory GC-FTIR analysis, the interface is most important.  Most
commonly, heated light pipes have been used.  Basically this involves a long
narrow flow cell coated with gold, with IR-transparent windows and with
transfer lines  for the GC effluent.  Matrix-isolation capillary GC-FTIR has
been commercially developed, and a real-time cold finger cryotrapping approach
has been reported by Griffiths.  In their present form, these systems would be
complex instrumentally for  field use, but offer advantages for higher
sensitivities and lower detection limits, as compared to the more common GC-
FTIR systems that use light pipes.

     Although GC-FTIR offers advantages for field analysis of volatile pol-
lutants, analytical techniques  for nonvolatiles by hyphenated-FTIR techniques
are in a less advanced stage of development.  HPLC-FTIR techniques are
currently  being studied by  the  EPA.  Supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC)
has also been combined with FTIR, and Liebman et al.(1989) have reported the
possibility  of  combining  such analytical techniques with fiber optics and
expert systems  for  field  use.   Although some of these methods may remain pri-
marily laboratory methods,  FTIR and hyphenated FTIR methods are increasingly
being considered for  field  conditions.  Fateley et al.  (1989) has recently
explored the use of long  path length FTIR  in a mobile field laboratory to
measure  air  emissions of  volatile organic  compounds from soil.

      Computers  are  integral parts of FTIR  instruments,  although they are being
increasingly used with  dispersive IR instruments also.  Although extensive IR
library  data bases  exist, many  of the  spectra  for dispersive  IR are  old and
are not equivalent to spectra analyzed under modern spectroscopic and sampling
conditions.   Yet, for many  field applications, dispersive  IR  spectrometers
with a minicomputer-based data  system  may  also be used  at  lower cost.  The
choice of the type of instrument is  best decided by the users to satisfy their
particular needs.
                                       54

-------
     in general, the use of  an FTIR spectrometer is strongly favored for most
measurements in which the  time to acquire data is limited by the type of
experiment  (e.g., on-line  gas chromatography-infrared (GC-IR) or for
techniques  in which the time needed for absorption spectroscopy is very long,
as with absorption spectroscopy  of samples with very high absorbance).

     FTIR has several other  advantages over conventional methods.  It is much
less susceptible to stray  radiation.  In addition, because a computer is
already used to obtain the Fourier transform, it is easy to add multiple scans
to improve  the signal-to-noise ratio  (for Poisson's distribution-type noise,
noise  adds  up as the  square  root of the number of scans, whereas signal adds
linearly).  Digital  subtraction  (useful for subtracting water background to
obtain infrared  spectra  in aqueous solutions) can produce difference spectra.
This method has  advantages in  obtaining infrared spectra in aqueous solutions.

     Although IR is  a. very specific technique, like other absorption methods,
it lacks the potential real-time sensitivity  for ultratrace measurements as
compared to UV-vis luminescence.  Special techniques have been used to improve
detection  limits of  IR including tunable  laser diode infrared absorption
spectroscopy.   FTIR,  in particular,  is  now  sensitive enough for many
environmental  applications.
 CONCLUSIONS
      Dispersive and FTIR instruments have already been used in the field,
 especially for total hydrocarbon and oil quantitation and characterization.
 The advantages of IR are largely that it is a mature technique with
 commercially available spectral libraries and that it is specific for
 characterization, because functional groups can be identified even for unknown
 compounds.  Quantitation is also performed, although some difficulties have
 been reported.  Disadvantages have included relative lack of sensitivity,
                                       55

-------
solvent interferences, and need for special solvents and optics.  One of the
greatest limitations of IR for in situ field analysis of liquids and solid
wastes is interference from water, which necessitates more complicated sample
preparation.  For this reason it has been used in the field mainly for vapor
phase applications  (either remotely or with long-path length gas cells).

     EPA has used infrared primarily as GC-FTIR, with vapor phase detection in
a light pipe, or for front surface measurements on a cryostat cold finger.
Fate ley et  al.  (1989) are also studying FTZR for soil gas emissions with vapor
phase detection.  Liebman (1988) has reported FTZR detection of pollutants
combined with supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and fiber-optic light-pipe
interfaces.  ZR used with HPLC and flow-through applications is less
developed.  For EPA, the future seems to hold increased use of GC-FTIR and
vapor phase long-path length ZR, including field deployment.  FTZR, with
attenuated  total reflectance  (ATR) attachments, is also applicable for
characterization of bulk pollutants and front surface measurements on complex
matrices  such as oil-soaked soils.  Portable ZR instruments exist and are used
in  the  field especially for gas analysis, but they should be miniaturized to a
greater extent. Near-IR portable instruments and sensors are under
development, but are mainly useful for relatively simple, highly concentrated
mixtures,  for process control, and for oil characterization.  Mid-IR sensors
are limited by  the  lack of  inexpensive fiber optic materials for the mid-lR
region  and by interference  from water.
                                       56

-------
                                  REFERENCES


     This reference section contains all references cited and an additional
selection of definitive references that should provide the reader with a basic
understanding of infrared absorption spectroscopy.


Ahmadjian, M., Baer, C. D., Lynch, P. F., and Brown, c. W., "infrared spectra
of Petroleum Weathered Naturally and Under Simulated conditions," Environ.
Sci. Tech., Vol. 10, 1976, p  777.

Anderson, C. P., Killeen, T.  J., Taft, J. B., and Bentz, A. P., "Improved
Identification of  Spilled Oils by Infrared Spectroscopy," Environ. Sci. Tech.,
Vol. 14,  1980, p 1230.

Brown, C. W., Lynch, P. F., and Ahmadjian, M., "Chemical Analysis of Dispersed
Oil in the Water Column," Chemical Dispersants for the control of Oil Spills,
1978, p  188.

Brown, C. W., Lynch, P. F., and Ahmadjian, M., "Monitoring Narragansett Bay
Oil Spills by infrared spectroscopy," Environ. Sci. Tech., Vol. 8, 1974, p
669.

colthrup, N. B., Daly, L. H., and Wiberley,  s. E., Eds., Introduction to
infrared and Raman Spectroseopy. Academic Press, NY,  1964.

Eastwood, D. and Lidberg, R., "Application of Fluorescence and 7T-IR
Techniques to Screening and Classifying  Hazardous Waste Samples," 7th National
Conference on Management of Uncontrolled Hazardous Waste Sites, 1986, pp 370-
379.

Fateley, w. G., Hammaker, R.  M., and  Gurka,  D. F.,  "Report on Preliminary
Evaluation of a High Resolution  Fourier  Transform Infrared  (HR-FT-IR) for
Environmental Monitoring," U.S.E.P.A.,  600/X-89/225,  1989.

Foxboro, informational  Brochures on Available  Instrumentation, The Foxboro
Company, 1989.

Fuoco,  R.,  Pentoney,  S. L., Jr.,  and  Griffiths,  P.  R.,  "Comparison of Sampling
Techniques  for  Combined Supercritical Fluid  Chromatography  and Fourier
Transform Infrared Spectrometry  with  Mobile  Phase Elimination," Anal. Chem.,
Vol.  61, 1989,  pp 2212-2218.

Grant,  D. F.  and Eastwood,  D., "Infrared spectrometric  Field-Method for
Identification of Natural  Seep-Oils," Talanta, Vol.  30, No.  11,  1983, pp  825-
830.

Griffiths,  P.  R.  and DeHaseth, J.  A., Fourier Transform Infrared  Soectrometrv.
John Wiley & sons,/ NY,  1986.

Griffiths,  P.  R.,  and Henry,  D.  E.,  "Coupled Gas Chromatography  and Fourier
Transform Infrared Spectrometry,"  Prog.  Analyt.  Spectrosc.,  Vol.  9,  1986,  pp
 455-482.
                                       57

-------
Griffiths, P. R., Haefner, A. M., Norton, K. L., Fraser, J. J., Pyo, D., and
Makishima, H.,  -FT-IR  Interface  for capillary Gas, Liquid, and Supercritical
Fluid Chromatography," J. High Res. Chromatogr., Vol.  12,  1989, pp 119-122.

Griffiths, P. R., Pentoney,  S. L., Jr., Giorgetti, A,  and  Shafer, K. H., "The
Hyphenation of  Chromatography and FT-IR Spectrometry," Anal. Chem., Vol. 58,
1986, pp  1349-1366.

Griffiths, P. R., Pentoney,  S. L., Jr., Pariente, G.  L., and Morton, K. L., "A
Unified Approach to  the  chromatography/FT-IR Interface," Mikrochim. Acta, Vol.
3, 1988,  pp 47-62.

Griffiths, P. R., Sloane, H. J., and  Hannah, R. W., Appl.  Spectrosc., Vol. 31,
1977, p 485.

Griffiths, P. R. and Wilkins, C. L.,  "GC/FT-IR and GC/FT-IR/MS Techniques for
Routine Environmental  Analysis," EPA  Project Report CR-811730-03, 1977.

Gurka, D.  F., "Current status of Hyphenated Fourier Transform Infrared  (FT-IR)
Techniques,"  in Instrumentation  for Trace Organic Monitoring. Lewis
Publishers, Chelsea, MI, 1989.

Gurka, D.  F., "Fourier Transform Infrared Detectors," Personal Communication,
1988.

Gurka, D.  F., "Gas  chromatography/Fourier Transform Infrared (GC/FT-IR)
Spectrometry  for Semivolatile organics:   Capillary Column," Method 8410 draft,
u.s.E.P.A., Office  of  Solid  Waste,  in press.

Gurka, D.  F., Titus, R., Griffiths, P. R.,  Henry, D., and  Giorgetti, A.,
"Evaluation of  an  Improved Single-Beam Gas  Chromatography/Fourier Transform
Infrared  Interface  for Environmental  Analysis," Anal. Chem., Vol. 59, No. 19,
1987, pp  2362-2369.

Henry, D. E., Giorgetti, A., Haefner, A.  N., Griffiths,  P. R., and Gurka, D.
F.,  "Optimizing the Optical  configuration for Light-Pipe Gas Chromatography
Fourier Transform  Infrared Spectrometry  Interfaces,"  Anal. Chem., Vol.  59, No.
19,  1987, pp  2356-2361.

Hoffland, L.  D., Piffath, R. J., and  Bauck, J. B.,  "Spectral Signatures of
Chemical  Agents and simulants,"  Optical  Engineering,  Vol.  24, No. 6, 1985, pp
982-984.

Jacquinot, P.,  17th Congres  du  GAMS,  Paris, 1954.

Kelly, J. J., Barlow,  c. H., Jinguji, T.  M., and  Callis, J. B.,  "Prediction of
Gasoline  octane Numbers  from Near-Infrared Spectral Features in  the Range 660-
1215nm,"  Anal.  Chem.,  Vol.  61,  1989,  pp  313-320.

King,  T.  V.,  Clark, R. N.,  "Reflectance  Spectroscopy  (0.2  to 20  urn) as  an
Analytical Method  for the Detection of Organics on Soils," Proceedings  First
international Symposium on Field Screening Methods  for Hazardous Haste  Site
investigations, Las Vegas,  NV,  1988,  pp  485-487.

Liebman,  S.  A., Fifer, R. A.,  Griffiths,  P. R., Lurcott, S., Bergman, B., and
Levy,  E.  J.,  "Detection Systems for supercritical Fluid Chromatography/Gas
Chromatography (SFC/GC)  Instrumentation;  Flame lonization  Detectors  (FID) and
Fiber Optic Monitor (FOM) Units,"  Paper 1545,  Pittsburgh Conference
Exposition,  Atlanta, GA, 1989a.
                                       58

-------
Liebman, S. A., Levy, E. J., Lurcott, s., O'Neill, s., Guthrie, J., and
Yocklovich, S., -integrated Intelligent  Instrument; supercritical Fluid
Extraction, Desorption, Reaction,  and chromatography," J. Chromatogr. Sci.,
Vol. 27, 1989b, pp  118-126.

Mattson, J. S., Mark, H. B., Jr.,  Prostak,  A.,  and Schutt, C.,  "Potential
Application of an infrared Spectroradiometer  for  Remote  Detection and
Identification of Oil Slicks on Water,"  Environ.  Sci. Technol., Vol. 5, No.  5,
1971, pp 415-420.

Montgomery, R. E.,  Remeta, D.  P.,  and Gruenfeld,  M.,  "Rapid  On-Site Methods  of
Chemical Analysis," in  contaminated Land. M.  A. Smith, Ed.,  Plenum, NY, 1985,
Chapter II, pp 257-309.

Pariente,  G.  L., Pentoney, S.  L.,  Jr., Griffiths, P.  R., and Sharer, K. H.,
"Computer-Controlled Pneumatic Amplifier Pump for supercritical Fluid
Chromatography and  Extractions," Anal. Chem., Vol.  59, No. 6,  1987, pp 808-
813.

Pentoney,  S.  L., Jr., Shafer,  K. H., and Griffiths, P. R., "A Solvent
Elimination  Interface for  Capillary supercritical Fluid  Chromatography/Fourier
Transform  Infrared  Spectrometry Using an Infrared Microscope," J. Chromatogr.
Sci., Vol. 24,  1986, pp 230-235.

Puskar, M. A., Levine,  s.  P.,  and Lowry, S. R., "Computerized Infrared
Spectral  Identification of compounds Frequently Found at Hazardous Haste
Sites," Anal. Chem., Vol.  58,  1986, p 1156.

Shafer, K. H., Griffiths,  P.  R., and Fuoco, R., "Gas  Chromatography/Fourier
Transform Infrared  Spectrometry Under a Microscope,"  J.  High Res. Chromatogr.
&  Chromatogr. Comm., Vol.  9,  1986, pp 124-126.

Shafer,  K. H., Griffiths,  P.  R., and Wang,  S. Q.., "Sample Transfer Accessory
for Thin-Layer Chromatography/Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry," Anal.
Chem.,  Vol.  58,  No. 13, 1986,  pp 2708-2714.

Shafer,  K. H.,  Pentoney, s.  L., Jr., Griffiths, P.  R.,   "Supercritical Fluid
Chromatography/Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrometry with an Automatic
Diffuse Reflectance Interface," Anal. Chem., Vol. 58, No. 1, 1986, pp  58-64.

Small,  G.  w., Kroutil,  R.  T.,  Ditillo, J. T., and Loerop, W. R.,  "Detection  of
Atmospheric Pollutants by Direct Analysis of Passive Fourier Transform
 infrared  Interferograms," Anal. Chem., Vol.  60, No. 3,   1988, pp 264-269.

 Stout,  P., and Mamantov, G., "Recent Advances  in Infrared Analysis of
 Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds," Chapter 13 in chemical  Analysis of Polycyclic
Aromatic  Compounds. T.  Vo-Dinh, Ed., John Wiley  & Sons,  NY,  1989,  pp 411-432.

 Spartz, M. L., Fateley, J. H., Witkowski, M. R., Hammaker, R. M.,   Fateley,  W.
 G., "Design  and Calibration of  a Mobile Laboratory for  On-Site Measurements  of
 volatile  organic Compounds (VOCs) Using Fourier  Transform Infrared
 Spectrometry (FT-IR)," Proceedings  of Conference on Hazardous Waste  Research,
 Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas,  1989.

 spartz, M. L., Witkowski, M. R., Fateley, J. H., Jarvis, J. M., White,  J. S.,
 paukstelis,  J. V.,  Hammaker, R. M., and Fateley, W. G.,  "Evaluation of a
 Mobile FT-IR system for Rapid  voc Determination: 1. Preliminary Qualitative
 and Quantitative Calibration Results," American  Environmental Laboratory,
 December  1989, in  press.
                                        59

-------
Spartz, H.L., Witkowski, M.  R., Fateley, J. B.f Jarvis, j. M., White, J. S.,
Paukstelis, J. V.,  Hammaker,  R. M., Fateley, W. G., Carter, R. E., Thomas, M.,
Lane, D. D., Harotz, G. A.,  Fairlesa, B. J., Holloway, T., Hudson, J. L., and
Gurka, D. F., "Evaluation of a Mobile FT-IR System for Rapid VOC
Determination; Fart 1:  Preliminary Qualitative and Quantitative calibration
Results,* American  Environmental Laboratory, November 1989, pp 15-30.
                                      60

-------
                                   SECTION 6
                              RAMAN SPECTROSCOPE

INTRODUCTION

     Raman spectroscopy has been used much less than IR spectroscopy due to
its relatively complex instrumentation, relatively low sensitivity and
interferences in the visible  from  fluorescence.  Recent improvements in near-
infrared  lasers sources to reduce  interferences from fluorescence and in
signal processing  have made Raman  techniques potentially more promising for
field applications.  Raman spectra are due to inelastic scattering processes
and the Raman-active vibrations are those which cause changes in the
polarizability of  the, molecule.  Therefore, Raman spectroscopy  is
complementary to  IR because Raman-active  vibrations are often IR-inactive and
vice versa.

THEORY

      In  general,  scattering  is produced when electrons in  a  molecule oscillate
under  the influence of  an applied  electromagnetic wave.  The extent of the
scattering depends on the polarizability  of the electrons  in the molecule
 (i.e., the dipole moment induced by  the electric  field).

      When a molecule with a spherical,  symmetric  electron  cloud is placed
between  the plates of a charged condenser,  the  electrons are pulled toward  the
positive plate and the protons toward the negative  plate.  The  molecule  is
 said to  be polarized, and has an induced  dipole moment.  Representing the vec-
 tor of the electric force of the external field as  E,  and the induced dipole

                                       61

-------
moment oriented parallel to the direction of E as H, \L can be  defined as  /J
oE, where a is the polarizability of the atom.  Using Cartesian coordinates
to resolve the electric field, this equation can be rewritten as:
For an asymmetric molecule, a may be different for the x, y, and z directions;
for the anisotropic case, the polarizability is described by a tensor

                             P. • «„ E. + a., ET + a_ B.
                             V, ' «„ E. * °w ET * an E.
                             P. • a» E. * a., ET * a« E.
where a.m, a^, . . . a,,, are proportionality constants between p. and E,, ^, and
E,, .  .  .p. and E,,  etc.

      when light of frequency v0 impinges  on  a molecule,  the electronic cloud
of the molecule develops an induced frequency.  An induced dipole moment
vibrates at frequency v.,  and its  amplitude  is proportional to the polariz-
ability of the molecule.  As a result, the molecule emits Rayleigh radiation,
the frequency of which is v0.

      The polarizability of the molecule depends on its size, shape, and orien-
tation; and it can be viewed as a polarizability ellipsoid.  The polariz-
ability ellipsoid may be modified as a result of change  in the  shape  of the
molecule due to vibrations of the atomic nuclei.  Therefore, radiation from
the molecule contains not only v.. the exciting frequency, but also the sum
and difference of the exciting and vibrational frequency v. i.e.,  v.. = v. + v.
and va = v. - v..
                                       62

-------
     The frequency  shifts v..  and v. are called anti-Stokes and Stokes Raman
lines (or bands), respectively.  The stokes Raman radiation is of lower
frequency (energy)  than the anti-Stokes and is usually the only spectrum
recorded.  Anti-Stokes bands  are due to thermally excited ("hot") states and
will decrease in  intensity at lower temperatures.

     In Raman spectroscopy a  powerful  laser source scatters light
inelastically from  the sample.  The scattered light, usually  collected at
right angles, reaches a spectrometer:  preferably one with high stray light
rejection, high resolution, and high throughput.

     Raman instruments require a powerful source, preferably  monochromatic.
Most Raman spectrometers  currently use argon  or krypton  ion lasers.   Light
scattering increases as v4, leading to a gain in Raman intensity at higher
frequencies  (shorter wavelengths).  For resonance Raman  analysis of
pollutants,  usually UV sources are required.   For this application excimer
lasers  such  as KrF  or frequency doubling or tripling a visible light source is
required.

     Raman  spectrometers  require high  resolution, low stray light
spectrometers; usually double or triple monochromators are used.  Concave
holographic  gratings also are more nearly perfect and improve throughput and
stray  light  rejection.   Other optics  and detectors  are similar to those needed
for luminescence measurements.

     A near infrared solid-state  laser source is now used on  one commercial FT
Raman  system.   This avoids fluorescence background, an important consideration
for most Raman measurements,  at the cost of some  sensitivity.

      Raman suffers from relative  insensitivity (20  -  1000 ppm even with argon
ion laser excitation) as compared to OV-vis fluorescence and  absorption,
                                       63

-------
although the optical and solvent problems are reduced if excitation in the UV
or visible is involved.  Water, for example, is not an interferent.  If lasers
with excitation wavelengths  in  the visible or UV region are used, background
fluorescence may be a serious problem, although there are ways to avoid this
(such as use of a large quantity of a fluorescence quencher, or time
resolution).

     For environmental use the  relative insensitivity of the normal Raman
technique coupled with the greater instrumentation complexity required for its
performance has so far limited  this technique to a few feasibility studies:
its use in the field still appears to be premature.

     Tilotta et al.  (1987) demonstrated a new signal processing approach which
involved optical multiplexing with Hadamard transform Raman spectroscopy in
the visible and near-IR spectral region.  This spectrometer utilizes a liquid
crystal spatial light, modulator (LC-SLM) in its exit focal plane,  in this
instrument, the dispersed radiation is focussed onto an encoding mask where
resolution elements  are transmitted or rejected by absorption, depending on
electronically controlled encodement which makes individual elements of the
mask opaque or transmitting. This instrument allows the rejection of Rayleigh
scattering and allows spectral  and background subtraction with simultaneous
observation of multiple Raman  levels for pollutants such as 2-nitropropane.
Although this relatively new technique has not yet been field tested, it
offers obvious advantages of increased experimental simplicity and time
savings  for on-the-fly or time-resolved  studies.

     As  stated by Gerrard and  Bowley  (1988), for most common analytical appli-
cations  involving routine qualitative  and quantitative analysis of unknowns,
better established  methods  are  available that are more rapid, are more
sensitive,  or have  larger data bases.   In general, other techniques are
preferred  to  normal Raman  spectroscopy,  when available, for environmental
                                       64

-------
analytical applications unless special, more sensitive Raman techniques can be
employed such as resonance Raman (using a tunable UV laser)  or surface-
enhanced Raman, or unless the special sampling advantages of Raman are needed.

RESONANCE RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY

     Normal Raman spectroscopy (MRS) is induced by excitation far removed from
any electronic transitions of the molecule, i.e., a virtual transition.  In
the Resonance Raman  (RR) effect, the frequency v. is  allowed to be near an
electronic absorption v^..   In this preresonance region,  a marked enhancement
of intensity can result due to a mechanism involving a single excited
electronic state,  in this case the intensity I of the resonance Raman signal
can be  given with several simplifying approximations (see discussion in Carey,
1982) as:
                                        f  v'  * v1 T
                            c~(v. ± vTit >•    r   ;.
                                        IK*-O 1
A  smaller term arising from the  vibronic  mixing of two excited states is not
shown.   This is the resonance Raman effect,  and the advantage is in its great
sensitivity and selectivity as a tool  for investigating chromophore structure,
because only vibrational modes directly associated with the chromophore have
their intensities enhanced.  Normal modes, which have a large shift in
equilibrium geometry upon electronic excitation, produce intense resonance
Raman features.

      The enhancement in the RR spectrum is typically between 10' and 104.  The
RR effect can be obtained at concentrations  of 10*4 M'L*1 or less.  At these
concentrations normal Raman spectra are usually undetectable.  Thus, RR
provides a means of selectively  probing vibrational frequencies of a
                                       65

-------
chromophore with  a  sensitivity  approaching that of ultraviolet absorption
spectroscopy.

       Raman,  like  ZR,  has  great  specificity, but differs from IR in two
important aspects.   Raman is  well suited to condensed phase samples and UV-RR
has the sensitivity for analyses  at the ppb level for some strong Raman
scatterers  (chromophores) without sample concentration.  The vibrational
information obtained is complementary  to ZR because the selection rules are
different and  may be especially useful for skeletal vibrations and some
specific vibrations such as the -C=N stretch.  The technique is still immature
and requires relatively cumbersome equipment such as an excimer laser and
Raman  shifter  or  a  crystal  to frequency-double a tunable visible laser source.
The Raman technique offers  a  large linear dynamic range, and water can be used
as a suitable  solvent.

     Mann and  Vickers (1988)  applied ultraviolet resonance-enhanced Raman (RR)
spectroscopy to hazardous waste analysis both directly and in conjunction with
HPLC.   some hazardous pollutants  that  have been analyzed by Raman include
phenols, dimethylsulfone,  sulfate and  bisulfate.

     Asher  et  al. (1983) found that PAHs, for example, could be studied with
excitation  far enough in the  UV region that fluorescence background was not
obtained.   The disadvantage from  the environmentalist's point of view is that
only the chromophore is excited.   Most pollutants do not have a suitable
chromophore in the visible region, and UV lasers are still expensive and
complex to  operate under field conditions.

SURFACE-ENHANCED RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY

      Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) appears to be the most promis-
ing  Raman technique for ultratrace environmental analysis, and consequently it
                                       66

-------
deserves more detailed discussion.  SERS was first observed by Fleischnann et
al. (1974) from pyridine molecules adsorbed on silver electrode surfaces that
had been roughened electrolytically by oxidation/reduction cycles.

     Enhancements in the Raman  scattering efficiency have been observed by
factors of as much as 10* in favorable cases when a compound is adsorbed on or
near special metal surfaces  (Jeanmaire and Van Duyne, 1977).  This enormous
enhancement of the normally  weak Raman scattering process helps to overcome
the relatively low sensitivity  of Raman  spectroscopy.  Its disadvantages are
that it is still not well  understood; electromagnetic and chemical sorption
effects both appear to be  involved, and  the effect does not occur to the same
extent for all analytes.

     The  electromagnetic effect is  associated with large local  fields caused
by electromagnetic resonances occurring  near metal surface structures.  A
major contributor  is  surface plasmons associated with collective excitations
of surface conduction electrons in metal particles  (Chang and Furtak, 1982).
These plasmons are excited by the incident  radiation  (Ritchie,  1957).  At  the
plasmon  frequency  the metal becomes highly  polarizable, resulting in large
local  surface  fields  that  increase the  Raman emission intensity, which  is
proportional to  the  square of the applied field at the surface.  Other  types
of electromagnetic  enhancement effects  include  the  lightning-rod effect, where
electromagnetic  field lines near high curvature points on the surface become
concentrated,  and the image effect, where the  surface is polarized by dipole-
induced fields in adsorbed molecules.

      Electromagnetic enhancement mechanisms are:  (1)  long  range  in  nature,
because the dipole, fields in polarizable metal particles vary as  the  inverse
cube of the distance to the center of the particle;  (2)  generally independent
of the adsorbed molecule and dependent on the electronic  structure of  the
 substrate and the roughness of the surface.
                                       67

-------
     The chemical sorption effect is associated with the overlap of metal and
adsorbate electronic wave functions, which can lead to ground-state and light-
induced charge transfer processes.  The chemical effect relating to SERS is
short range  (0.1 to 0.5 nm), depending on the adsorption site, the geometry of
bonding, and the energy levels of the adsorbate molecule.  Although the
contribution of charge-transfer processes to SERS may be large in some cases
(xlO-10'j,  the chemical enhancement mechanism is restricted by its
specificity.

     The SERS effect  is similar to  normal Raman scattering in that the inten-
sity of the  scattered light  is linear with that of the incident light and is
depolarized. This effect seems to  occur only under specific experimental
conditions relating to the dielectric constant  and morphology of  the surfaces.
Silver  surfaces  give  the strongest  enhancement  effects, followed  by Cu, Au,
Pt, and Ni.   The  roughening  of the  surfaces  is  also critical and  depends on
the type of  surface preparation.  Microspheres, posts, metal islands,
colloids,  and metal-coated cellulose have been  used.  For  spheroidal silver
particles, diameters  ranging from 10 to  100  nm  are optimal.  For  roughened
silver  electrodes the surface protrusions are generally between 25-500 nm.

      The  SERS effect  for  silver  island  substrates was found to occur with the
first monolayer of adsorbate molecules.   SERS spectra of pyrene adsorbed on
silver-coated quartz  posts were  found to show some peak  shifts  (e.g.,  1582
cm'1  vs  1597  cm'1 for NRS of pyrene in solution).  This indicates that these
vibrations were affected by  adsorption  to the metal  surface.  For large
molecules, only chemical groups  close  to the SERS-active surface  may be
enhanced.

      Vo-Dinh and coworkers (1984) evaluated the SERS technique  for
environmental applications using practical SERS-active  substrate  materials
based on silver-coated Teflon microspheres deposited on glass and filter

-------
 paper.   A wide variety of organophosphorus chemicals including methyl
 parathion, fonofoxon, cyanox,  diazinon,  formothion,  and dimethoate were
 investigated (Alak and Vo-Oinh,  1987).   SERS analyses were reported of  several
 chlorinated pesticides including carbophenothion,  bromophos,  dichloran,
 linuron, chlordan and 1-hydroxychlordene (Alak and Vo-Dinh,  1988).   The
 detection limits for these pesticides were measured  at nanograo and
 subnanogran levels.   The results achieved with these chemicals  are  of great
 analytical interest  because these chemicals are difficult  to  detect by  other
 techniques,  such as  luminescence spectroscopy,  due to the  low luminescence
 quantum yields of these compounds.  A mixture of structurally related
 compounds and a soil sample contaminated with pesticides were analyzed  by SERS
 to  illustrate the selectivity  of this new technique  as  a screening  tool for
 environmental applications (Alak and Vo-Dinh,  1987).  Vo-Dinh (1989)  has
 demonstrated the SERS spectrum of complex environmental samples  (diesel
 particulate  samples  from the National Institute  for  Standards and Technology)
 containing six PAR compounds as  spotted  on various SERS-active substrates.

     Carrabba et al.  (1987)  have reported using  SERS  to analyze for compounds
 such as  hydrazines used for rocket fuels.   They  currently are developing a
 prototype field-deployable  SERS  using utilizing  electrochemical roughening of
 silver electrodes.  A fiber-optic  system was  also  recently developed  for SERS
 in  situ  analysis using a  silver-coated,  microparticle-based sensing probe
 (Bello and Vo-Dinh,  1990).

     The use  of  silver colloids  for SERS  measurements in solutions has been
 investigated  widely  (Tran,  1984; Sheng et al., 1986;  Laseraa et al., 1987;
Ahern and Garrell, 1987).  Recently,  Fateley and coworkers have developed the
SERS colloid  technique for HPLC detection (Freeman et al.,  1988).
Measurements  of  SERS  in the  near IR region have also recently been
investigated  (Chase and Parkinson, 1988).
                                      69

-------
CONCLUSIONS

     Raman spectroscopy, because it is a relatively under-utilized technique
involving complex instrumentation and laser excitation, is probably the
farthest from field deployment.  Normal Raman spectroscopy has structural
information overlapping with,  and complementary to, IR.  It has the advantage
that water and glass  are not  interferents and that solid samples and unusual
sample shapes and sizes can be accommodated.  NRS is also relatively
insensitive with detection limits between 20 and 1000 ppm.  Techniques with
greater sensitivity,  rivaling luminescence, are resonance Ramam (RR), which
requires even more complex instrumentation  (excimer lasers or frequency-
doubling crystals and Raman shifters) and surface-enhanced Raman.

     SERS is a promising technique in terms of its potential sensitivity and
specificity.  It could also be used with sensor technology.  One of its
disadvantages is that the intensity of the  Raman signal is dependent on the
substrate surface and material and also on  the specific analytes being
studied.  Also, SERS  is a new technology, not yet fully understood and
implemented.  Although there  is  interest in developing a field-deployable
instrument, only a  few research  groups can  so far obtain reliable,
reproducible, and sensitive SERS results even in the laboratory.  Pollutants
which  have been successfully  studied by this technique include pyridine,
hydrazine, and other  rocket fuels, PAHs, and organochlorine and
organophosphate pesticides.   Extensive research efforts are currently being
undertaken to develop the potential of this relatively new analytical
technique.
                                       70

-------
                                  REFERENCES


     This reference section contains all references cited and an additional
selection of definitive references that should provide the reader with a basic
understanding of Raman spectroscopy.


Ahern, A. M. and Garrell, R. L., Anal. Chen., Vol. 59, 1987,
p 2816.

Ahmadjian, M., Brown, C. W., "Feasibility of Remote Detection of Hater
pollutants and Oil slicks by Laser-Excited Raman Spectroscopy," Environ. Sci.
Technol., Vol. 7, No. 5, 1973, pp 452-453.

Alak, A. and Vo-Dinh, T., Anal. Chem., Vol. 59, 1987, p 2149.

Alak, A. and Vo-Dinh, T., Anal. Chim. Acta, Vol. 206, 1988,
p 333.

Asher, S. A., Johnson, C. R.,  and Murtagh, J., Review of Scientific
Instrumentation, Vol. 54, 1983, p 1657.

Angel, S. M., Archibald, D. D., "Near-Infrared Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectra
of  3-picoline and 3-Chloropyridine on a copper Electrode," Appl. Spectrosc.,
Vol.  43, NO. 6,  1989,, pp 1097-1099.

Angel, S. M., Katz, L. F., Archibald, D. D., and Honigs, 0. E., "Near-Infrared
Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy.  Part II:  Copper and Gold Colloids,"
Appl. Spectrosc., Vol. 43, No. 3, 1989, pp 367-372.

Angel, S. M., Katz, L. F., Archibald, D. D., Lin, L. T., and Honigs, D. E.,
"Near-Infrared Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy.  Part I:  Copper and Gold
Electrodes," Appl. Spectrosc., Vol.  42, No. 8, 1988, pp 1327-1331.

Angel, s. M., Kyrick, M. L.,  "Near-Infrared Surface-Enhanced Raman
spectroscopy Using a  Diode Laser," Anal. Chem., Vol. 61, No. 15, 1989, pp
1648-1652.

Angel, S. M., Myrick, M. L.,  "Near-Infrared Surface-Enhanced Raman
spectroscopy using Fiber optics," Presented at Argonne National Laboratory,
1989.

Angel, S. M., Myrick, M. L.,  and Milanovich, F. P.,  "Surface-Enhanced Raman
spectroscopy Using Commercially Available Au Colloids," Appl. Spectrosc.,  in
press.

Archibald,  D. D., Lin, L. T.,  and Honigs, D. E.,  "Raman Spectroscopy over
Optical  Fibers with  the  Use  of a Near-IR FT spectrometer," Appl. Spectrosc.,
Vol.  42,  No.  8,  1988,  pp 1558-1563.

Baek,  M., Nelson, W.  H.,  and Hargraves,  P. E.,  "Ultra-violet Resonance Raman
spectra  of  Live  Cyanobacteria with  222.5  - 251.0  nm Pulsed Laser Excitation,"
Appl.  Spectrosc., Vol.  43,  No. 1,  1989,  pp  159-162.
                                       71

-------
Baranska, H., "An Introduction to Raman Scattering," Laser Raman snectrometrv;
Analytical Applications.  H.  Baranaka, A. Labudzinska, and J. Terpinski, Eds.,
j. R. Majer, Trans.  Ed.,  John Wiley & sons, NY, Chapter  1, 1987, pp 9-31.

Bello, J. M. and vo-Dinh,  T., "Surface-Enhanced Raman Fiber-Optic Sensors,"
Appl. Spectrosc., January 1990,  in press.

Bergin, F. J., and  shurvell,  H.  F., -Applications of Fourier Transform Raman
Spectroscopy in an  Industrial Laboratory," Appl. Spectrosc., Vol. 43, Ho. 3,
1989, pp  516-522.

Berthod,  A., Laserna,  J.  J.,  Winefordner, J.  D., "Surface Enhanced Raman
Spectrometry on silver Hydrosols Studied by Flow Injection Analysis," Appl.
Spectrosc., Vol.  41, No.  7,  1987, pp  1137-1141.

Bohlke, A. P., Tate, J. D.,  White, J. S., Paukstelis, J. V., Bammaker, R. M.,
and  Fateley, W. G., "Near-Infrared Hadamard Transform Raman Spectrometry," J.
Mol.  Spectrosc.,  in press, 1989.

Carey, P.R., Biochemical Applications of Raman and  Resonance Raman
speetroacopies. Chapters 1,2,3,  Academic Press, NY,  1982, pp  1-70.

carrabba, M. M.,  Edmonds, R. B.  Marren, P. J. and Rauh,  R. D.,  "The
suitability  of Surface Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy  (SERS) to Fiber Optic
chemical  Sensing  of Aromatic Hydrocarbon contamination  in Groundwater,"
Proceedings  First international Syposium on Field Screening Methods  for
Hazardous Waste  Site Investigations,  Las Vegas, NV,  1988, pp  31-40.

Carrabba, M. M.,  Edmonds, R. B., and  Rauh, R. D.,  "Feasibility studies for the
Detection of organic Surface and Subsurface Water Contaminants by surface-
Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy on silver Electrodes,"  Anal. Chem., vol.  59,  1987,
pp 2559-2563.

Chang,  R. K.  and Furtak, T. E.,  Eds., surface -  Enhanced Raman Scattering,
Plenum,  NY,  1982.

Chase,  D. B.,  Parkinson, B. A., "Surface-Enchanced Raman Spectroscopy in the
Near-Infrared,"  Appl. Spectrosc.,  Vol.  42, No. 7,  1988,  pp 1186-1187.

Christesen,  s.  D.,  "Raman Cross Sections  of  Chemical Agents  and Simulants,"
Appl. Spectrosc., Vol. 42, No.  2,  1988,  pp 318-321.

Everall,  N.  J.,  Howard, J.,  "Signal-to-Noise Considerations  in FT-Raman
Spectroscopy." Appl. Spectrosc., Vol. 43,  No. 5,  1989,  pp 778-781.

Fleischmann, M.,  Hendra, P.  J., and McQuillan, A.  J.,  Chem.  Phys. Lett.,  Vol.
 260, 1974, p 163.

 Freeman, R. D.,  Hammaker, R. M., Meloan,  c.  E.,  and Fateley,  w. G.,  Appl.
 Spectrosc., Vol. 42,  1988, p 456.

 Garrell, R. L.,  "Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy," Anal.  Chem.,  Vol. 61,
 No. 6, 1989, pp. 401-411.

 Gerrard, D. L., and Bowley,  H.  J., "Raman Spectroscopy," Anal. Chem., 60.
 1988, pp 368-377.

 Gerrard, D. L., and Bowley,  H.  J., "Raman Spectroscopy," Chapter 14 in
 chemical Analysis  of  Polvcvclic Aromatic Compounds. T. Vo-Dinh, Ed., John
 Wiley &  Sons, NY,  1989,  pp  433-450.
                                       72

-------
Grasselli, J. G., Snavely,  M.  K.,  and Bulkin, B. J., chemical Applications of
Raman speetroscopv. Chapters  1,2,3,9, John Wiley &  Sons, NY, 1981, pp  1-58,
147-165.

Heater, R. E.,  "Time-Resolved Raman  spectroscopy,"  The SPEX Speaker, SPEX,
Metuchen, NJ, 1982.

Hager, R. W., Anal. Chem.,  Vol.  45,  1973, p  1131.

Hawthorne, A. R., Amer.  Ind.  Hyg.  Assoc.  J., Vol. 41,  1980,
p 915.

Jeanmaire, D. J.  and  Van Duyne,  R. P.,  J. Electroanal. Chem., Vol. 84,  1977, p
1.

Jones, C. M., Devito, V. L.,  Harmon, P.  A.,  and Asher, S.  A.,  "High-
Repetition-Rate Excimer-Based UV Laser  Excitation Source Avoids  Saturation in
Resonance Raman Measurements of Tyrosinate  and  Pyrene," Appl. Spectrosc., Vol.
41,  No.  8,  1987,  pp 1268-1275.

Kamogawa, K., Fujii,  T., and Kitagawa,  T.,  "Improved Fluorescence Rejection  in
Measurements of Raman Spectra of Fluorescent Compounds," Appl. Spectrosc.,
Vol. 42, NO.  2, 1988, pp 248-254.

Laserna, J.  J., Berthod, A., and Winefordner, J. D., "Quantitative Analysis  by
Surface-Enchanced Raman spectrometry on silver  Hydrosols  in a  Flow-Injection
System," Talanta, Vol. 34, No. 8, 1987,  pp  745-747.

Laserna, J.  J., Berthod, A., and winefordner, J. D., "Evaluation and
Optimization of Experimental Conditions for Surface-Enhanced Raman Detection
of  Analytes  in  Flow injection Analysis," Microchemical Journal,  Vol.  38,  1988,
pp  125-136.

Laserna,  J.  J., Berthod, A., and winefordner, J. D., Appl. Spectrosc., Vol.
 41, 1987,  p 1137.

Laserna,  J.  J., Campiglia, A. D., and winefordner,  J. D.,  "Surface-Enhanced
Raman Spectrometry on a silver-Coated Filter Paper Substrate," Anal.  Chim.
Acta, 208,  1988, pp 21-30.

 Laserna,  J.  J., Torres, E. L., and winefordner, J.  D., "Studies  of Sample
 preparation for Surface-Enhanced  Raman Spectrometry on Silver  Hydrosols,"
 Anal. Chim.  Acta, 200,  1987, pp 469-480.

 Liang-Tsair Lin, Mann, C.  K., and vickers,  T.  J.,  "Feasibility of Quantitative
 UV Resonance Raman Spectroscopy with a KrF Excimer Laser," Appl. Spectrosc.,
 Vol. 41, No. 3,  1987, pp 422-427.

 Long, D. A., Raman snectroscopy.  McGraw-Hill International, NY,  1977

 Mann, C. K., Vickers, T. J.,  "Hazardous Waste Analysis by Raman Spectroscopy,"
 Proceedings of the First international Symposium on Field Screening Methods
 for Hazardous Waste  Site Investigations, 1988,  pp  111-116.

 Mann, c. K., Vickers, T. J.,  "Raman Measurements in the Presence of
 Fluorescence," Appl.  Spectrosc.,  Vol. 41, No.  3, 1987, pp 427-430.

 Marley, N. A., Mann,  C. K.,  and vickers, T. J., "Determination of Phenols in
 Water Using Raman  Spectroscopy,"  Appl. Spectrosc., Vol.  38, No. 4, 1984, pp
 540-543.
                                        73

-------
Mar ley, N. A., Mann, c.  K.,  and vickers, T. J.,  "Raman spectroacopy in Trace
Analysis for Phenols in  Water," Appl. Spectrosc., Vol. 39, No. 4,  1985, pp
628-633.

Meier, M., Carron, K. T.,  Fluhr, H., and Wokaun, A., "A Sensitive  Multichannel
Detection System for Surface Raman  Spectroscopy," Appl. Spectrosc., Vol. 42,
No. 6, 1988, pp 1066-1072.

Myrick, M. L., Angel, S. M., "Characteristics of GRIN Lenses  for Raman
Spectroscopy." Appl. Opt.,  in press.

Myrick, M. L., Angel, s. M., "Elimination  of Background in Fiber-optic Raman
Measurements,"  Appl. Spectrosc., in press.

Myrick, M. L., Angel, S. M., "Comparison of Some Fiber-optic  configurations
for Measurements of Luminescence and Raman Scattering,"  Appl. Opt., in press.

Myrick, M. L., Angel, S. M., "Wavelength Selection for Fiber-Optic Raman
Spectroscopy." Appl. Opt.,  in press.

Pemberton, J. E.,  Sobocinski, R. L., and Carter, D. A., "Raman Spectroscopy
Using Charge-Coupled Device Detection," Spectroscopy, in press, 1989.

Puree 11, F. J., Heinz, R.  E., "Is FT-Raman Really Worth It?," a SPEX
publication, 1989.

Ritchie, R. H., Phys. Rev.,  Vol. 106,  1957, p 879.

Rumelfanger, R., Asher,  S.  A., and  Perry,  M. B., "UV Resonance Raman
Characterization of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Coal  Liquid
Distillates," Appl. Spectrosc., Vol. 42, No. 2,  1988, pp 267-272.

Schlotter, N. E.,  Schaertel, S. A., Kelty, S. P., and Howard, R.,  "Low-Signal-
Level Raman Spectroscopy with an Intensified Optical Multichannel  Array
Detector," Appl. Spectrosc., Vol. 42, No.  5, 1988, pp 746-753.

Schraeder, B., Simon, A.,  "FT-Raman Spectroscopy," Bruker Application Note  (a
brochure), no date.

Sheng, R. S., Zhu, L., and Morris,  M., Anal. Chem., Vol. 58,  1986, p 1116.

Soper, S. A., and  Kuwana,  T., "Matrix-Isolated  Surface-Enhanced Raman
Spectroscopy  (SERS):  The  Role of the  supporting Matrix," Appl. Spectrosc.,
Vol. 43, No. 7, 1989, pp 1180-1187.

Terpinski, J., "Identification of Organic  Compounds," Laser Raman
Spectrometry; Analytical Applications. H.  Baranska, A. Labudzinska, and J.
Terpinski, Eds., J. R. Majer, Trans. Ed.,  John  Wiley & Sons,  NY, Chapter 4,
1987, pp 79-141.

Tilotta, D. C., Freeman, R. D., and Fateley, W.  G., "Hadamard Transform
Visible Raman Spectrometry," Appl.  Spectrosc.,  Vol. 41, No. 8, 1987, pp 1280-
1287.

Tran, C. D., Anal. Chem.,  Vol. 56,  1984, p 824.

Treado,  P. J. and  Morris,  M. D.,  "Hadamard Transform Raman Imaging," Appl.
Spectrosc., Vol. 42, No. 5, 1988, pp  897-901.

Vickers, T. J., Mann,  C. K., Marley, N. A.,  and King, T. H.,  "Raman
Spectroscopy  for Quantitative Multicomponent Analysis,"  American  Laboratory,
October  1984, pp 19-34.


                                       74

-------
Vo-Dinh, T.  in Chemical  Analyses of  Polvcvclic Aromatic Compounds. Wiley &
Sons, NY,  1989, Chapter  15,  p 451.

Vo-Dinh, T.,  Hironoto, H.  Y.  K., Begur, G. M., and Moody, R. L., Anal. Chem.,
Vol. 56, 1984, p  1667.

Williamson,  J. H.,  Bowling,  R.  J., McCreery, R. L., "Near-Infrared Raman
spectroscopy with a 783-nm Diode Laser and CCD Array Detector," Appl.
Spectroac.,  Vol.  43,  No.  3,  1989, pp 372-375.
                                      75

-------
                                   SECTION 7
                     SPECTROSCOPIC IMMUNOASSAY TECHNIQUES

INTRODUCTION

     Inununoassay-iiranunological methods, offering the capability of excellent
selectivity and  specificity through the process of antibody-antigen recogni-
tion, have revolutionized many aspects of chemical and biological sensor
technologies down to ultratrace levels.  Although radioimmunoassay (RIA),
utilizing radioactive  labels, has been most widely used, it has disadvantages
for field use, such as cost of instrumentation, short shelf life of some
radioisotopes  and hazards of handling radioactive materials under field
conditions.  Fluoroimmunoassay (FIA) using fluorescent labels and related
assay methods  has great potential advantages for field use with a spot test
approach and has been  discussed elsewhere in great detail (Smith et al., in
Wehry Vol. 3,  1981; Karnes et al. in Schulman, 1985).

DISCUSSION

     The theory  of  immunoassay is beyond  the scope of this report, but
considerable chemistry and biochemistry is involved for the development of
each test.  Suitable derivatives of the pollutant must be developed that can
be complexed to  proteins  so that specific antibodies can bind to them with
high affinities. Conjugates of these derivatives must be prepared with
properties to  allow rapid bonding to immobilized antibodies and good recovery
and  stability  of enzyme activity.
                                       76

-------
     A survey of all aspects of luminescence immunoassay is given by Karnes et
al. (1985).  This rapidly moving field was earlier surveyed by Smith et al.,
in Wehry  (1981).  Karnes et al. (1985) stated that FIA sensitivities were
typically in the 10'" M range.   FIA techniques are not yet as sensitive as RIA
procedures, although they can be made more sensitive using laser excitation.
Currently, commercial  instrumentation for FIA is  limited to simple analyses
not requiring extremely high sensitivities.  One  approach to improve FIA
sensitivity would be to use time-resolved fluorescence or phosphorescence
detection.  Use of image detectors  for spectral or spatial resolution would
also reduce sample analysis time.

     FIA  can also be used with  fiber optic chemical sensors.  Vc-Dinh et al.,
(1987) have developed  immunochemical fiber optic  sensors for specific
environmental pollutants such as benzo(a)pyrene.

     Colorimetric immunoassay tests are  also  specific and sensitive although
not quite as sensitive as FIA and RIA.   Colorimetric portable immunoassay kits
for pesticides  such  as paraoxon were recently discussed by Duquette et al.
(1988).   In this case  the analyte competes with an enzyme-analyte conjugate
for a  limited number of  immobililized antibody sites.  This  test can detect
paraoxon  at one microliter  in water with positive results indicated by color
development in  ten minutes.  This test is operable in salt water and fresh
water  and is stable  under  field conditions  for as long as one year.  This
assay  format could be  modified  to measure other environmental pollutants  such
as PCBs.

     Three other examples  of  field-portable Colorimetric  immunoassay
 (biomarker) procedures were recently  reported by  White and Van Emon  (1989)  and
are discussed below.
                                       77

-------
     Westinghouae Bioanalytic Systems  (Rockville, MD.) has developed a rapid
test for the wood preservative pentachlorophenol which is sensitive to 3 ppb
and takes only 30 minutes to perform.  A pentachlorophenol-enzyme conjugate
competes with free pentachlorophenol for binding to the immobilized antibody.
The enzyme binds on a colorimetric substrate with absorbances being measured
on a battery-operated field portable colorimeter.  This method was
successfully demonstrated at a Superfund site  in Hew Brighton, MN.

     Antox corporation developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
for toxic light aromatics including benzene, toluene, and xylene  (BTX), which
is claimed to be sensitive to the ppm  level.   The BTX screening assay uses a
polyclonal antibody-coated tube as the solid phase.  This test is still under
evaluation; phenols do not appear to be an interferent but the antibody may
cross-react with alkylated aromatics.

     A third  assay described by Brady  et al.  (1989)  for aldicarb, requires
minimum sample preparation and analysis time of 2.5  hours.   The assay response
is  linear over the range of  16 to 2000 ng.

     As summarized by White  and Van Emon  (1989),  immunoassay techniques have
important advantages and disadvantages.  The advantages include relative
sensitivity,  specificity, cost-effectiveness,  and speed in comparison with
more common 6C-HS  analysis.  They can  be used  as rapid field-portable
semiquantitative  or  quantitative methods,  to process large number of samples,
to  reduce time for sample preparation, and as  screening methods.

      Disadvantages include  the  fact  that  these methods usually can  not be used
for unknown chemicals  or chemical classes  or on complex mixtures  of unknown
compounds.   Also,  they are  subject  to  interferences and cross-reactivities
with compounds other than the  target analyte.   They are not  real  time methods;
sample preparation and time for reaction is needed.   They may have  a limited
                                       78

-------
dynamic range.  Also, considerable lead tine can be involved in developing
immunoassay procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

     Fluoroimmunoassay  (FIA)  and colorimetric immunoassay techniques can be
extremely  sensitive  (especially FIA)  and  specific  (perhaps too specific, they
usually cannot  be  used  for  class detection).  Because of their specificity
individual reagents  are usually required  for each  pollutant, when, in many
situations, broad  classes of  pollutants are of  interest.  Nevertheless,
immunoassay can be made field-portable and applicable for pollutant
monitoring.   These techniques will be most needed  where simpler fluorescence,
colorimetric, or fluorometric procedures  do not apply and when extreme
specificity is  needed.   They  also can be  used with FOCS, in some cases.
                                       79

-------
                                  REFERENCES


     This reference section  contains  all  references cited and an additional
selection of definitive references that should provide the reader with a basic
understanding of spectroscopic  inununoassay  techniques.


Brady, J. F., Fleeker, J.  R., Wilson, R.  A.,  and Mumma, R. O.,  "Enzyme
Immune-assay for Aldicarb," in Biological  Monitoring for Pesticide Exposure. R.
G. H. Wang, c. A. Franklin,  R.  C. Honey cutt,  and J. C. Re inert, Eds., ACS
Symposium Series 382, ACS, Washington, DC,  1989.

Collins, W. P., Ed., Alternative Immunoassavs. John Wiley & Sons, NY, 1985.

Duquette, P. H., Guire, p. E.,  and Swanson, H. J., "Fieldable Enzyme
inununoassay Kits for Pesticides," Proceedings First International Symposium on
Field screening Methods for  Hazardous Waste Site Investigations, 1988, pp 239-
242.

Hammock, B. D. and Mumma,  R. O., and  Recent Advances  in Pesticide Analytical
Methodology. J. Harvey, Jr.  and G. Zweig, Eds., Am. Chem. Soc., Washington,
DC,  1980.

Karnes,  H. T.,-O'Neal, J.  s., and Schulman, S. G., "Luminescence Immunoassay,"
in Molecular Luminescence Spectroscoov; Methods and Applications. Part 1. S.
G. Schulman, Ed., John Wiley &  Sons,  NY,  1985, pp  717-780.

Lin, J.  N., Kopeckova, P., Ives, J.,  Chuang,  H., Kopecek, J., Herron, J., Yen,
H. R., Christensen, D., Andrade, J. D.,  "Remote, Continuous, Multichannel
Biochemical sensors Based on Fluoroimmunoassay Technologies," Proceedings
First International Symposium on Field  Screening Methods for Hazardous Waste
Site investigations,  1988, pp 251-252.

smith, D. S., Hassan, M.,  and Nargessi, R.  D.,  "Principles and  Practice of
Fluoroimmunoassay Procedures,"  in Modern  Fluorescence Spectroscopv  3. E. L.
Wehry, Ed., Plenum, NY,  1981, pp 143-192.

van  Emon, J. M., Seiber,  J.  N., and Hammock,  B. D., in Analytical Methods for
Pesticides  and Plant  Growth  Regulators. Vol.  XVII. Academic Press,  1989, pp
217-263.

van  Emon, J. M., Seiber,  J.  N., and Hammock,  B. D., in ACS Symp. Ser., Vol.
276,  1985,  pp  307-316.

Vo-Dinh, T., Tromberg, B. J., Griffin,  G. D., Ambrose, K. R., Sepaniak, M. J.,
and  Gardenhire, E.  M., Appl. Spectrosc.,  Vol. 41,  1987, p 735.

white, R. J. and van  Emon, J. M., "Report on  Immunochemical Techniques for
Identifying and Quantifying  organic compounds in Biological and Environmental
Samples," U.S.E.pA.  Report  EPA/600/X89/288,  1989.
                                       80

-------
                                   SECTION 8
                         FIBER OPTIC CHEMICAL SENSORS
INTRODUCTION

     Fiber-optic chemical sensors (FOCS) offer a means of expanding the role
of spectroscopy in environmental monitoring.  The need for in situ, low-cost,
real-time monitoring of organic and inorganic pollutants in ground water and
surface waters has been one of the main forces driving the development of
fiber optic sensors, particularly FOCS.  The toxic pollutants of interest
cover a wide range of contaminants from organic chlorides, phenols, and heavy
metals from industrial and hazardous waste sites to aromatic hydrocarbons from
leaking underground storage tanks to organophosphates from Department of
Defense installations.

     FOCS can be made very sensitive and specific to satisfy regulatory
requirements.  Other advantages of FOCS include their small physical size,
geometric flexibility, and the possibility of real-time, multiple analyses in
situ.  Disadvantages include  short operational and storage life (due to
complex chemistries) and  lack of ruggedness.  Another disadvantage is the
relatively narrow  spectral range of inexpensive, commercially available
fibers, although better UV and IR fibers are being developed.  The present
lack of performance and calibration standards for interfiber reproduciblity
represents another problem to be overcome by developing peer-approved ASTM
standards.  Recent advances in spectrochemical instrumentation, laser
miniaturization, biotechnology, and fiber optics research have provided
                                       Bl

-------
opportunities  for  novel  approaches to the development of sensors for the
detection of environmental pollution by toxic chemicals.

DISCUSSION

     Fiber optic  sensors may  be divided into two general classes.  The first
class of sensors  uses the waveguide, usually an optical fiber, as a simple
lightpipe taking  light to and from a sensing device, such as a microcell
containing a dye  that exhibits changes in absorbance or luminescence with
varying concentrations of a substance or a physico-chemical parameter (e.g.,
CO,,  o,, or pH).   For this class of sensors, one important factor involves the
light transmission efficiency through the fiber.  The second category of
sensors involves  an intrinsic change in the properties of the optical fiber
itself, which  serves as  the sensing element.  This category may be further
subdivided into two subcategories:  evanescent field sensors and surface
plasmon resonance sensors.

     Fiber optics sensors can use either bifurcated or single-strand fibers.
in a device  based on bifurcated design, separated fibers carry the excitation
and  emission radiation.   In the single-fiber device, a dichroic filter or
mirror-pinhole assembly  is  generally used to separate the excitation and
emission  radiation.  When compared to multiple (bifurcated) fiber designs,
sensors that utilize a single optical  fiber to transmit excitation radiation
to the  sample, and the emission radiation from the sample to the detector,
have the  advantages of good signal collection efficiency and small size.  The
small-diameter attribute is  important  for environmental applications, since it
may  be  important to fit a number  of different sensors down a one or two inch
monitoring well.   Single-fiber sensors, however, exhibit high optical
background levels because a significant amount of excitation radiation, which
is reflected at the fiber tip, is not  efficiently rejected by spatial
filtering.   Attempts to minimize  this  back-scatter radiation problem include
                                       82

-------
the use of high rejection ratio double monochromators,  and grinding fiber
faces at angles that minimize the reflected optical background.  Disadvantages
of these correction techniques include the relatively low throughput of double
monochromators and the difficulty of producing small quartz surfaces with
precise angles.

     Optical  fibers utilize total internal reflection (TIR) to achieve propa-
gation length with very  low loss, but another complementary feature of TIR can
be used in optical sensing for surface sensitivity.  Evanescent-field spectro-
scopy is an extension of the well-known internal reflection method.  The
evanescent-field  technique uses an optical waveguide as the transmitting
medium in place of the crystal medium often used in internal reflection
spectroscopy. When light is reflected at a dielectric interface, i.e., at the
interface between two materials of different refractive indices, the energy
associated with the light is not totally confined to the material in which the
incident and  reflected waves are propagated.  There is a drastic decrease of
energy away from  the reflected point into the second material.  This field is
known as the  evanescent  field, because energy cannot be propagated in this
direction.  It decays within a distance comparable with the wavelength of the
light.

     Sensors  can  also be based on the application of the surface plasmon
resonance  (SPR) principle.  It is possible to arrange a dielectric/metal/
dielectric  sandwich such that, when light impinges on a metal surface, a wave
is excited  within the plasma formed by the conduction electrons of the metal.
A surface plasmon is a surface-charge-density wave at a metal surface.  A
plasmon  resonance is induced in the surface of a metal conductor by the impact
of light reflected/off the metal surface.  The critical angle is naturally
very sensitive to the dielectric constant of the medium immediately adjacent
to the metal, and this characteristic therefore lends itself to exploitation
for analytical sensors.  For example, the metal can be deposited as, or on, a
                                       83

-------
grating; upon illumination with a wide band of frequencies, the absence of
reflected light can be observed at the frequencies at which the resonance
matching conditions are net.

     The most common FOGS reagents are organic chemicals whose reaction
products are suitable for colorimetric or fluorometric measurements.  A number
of such sensors have been developed  (Wolfbeis in Schulman, 1988).  Angel
(1989) recently field-tested  a colorimetric sensor for trichloroethylene.
Much of the required chemistry for such  sensors is discussed in the older
chemical literature.  Many of the chemical reagents are not reliable under
field  conditions  or are not designed for stability for the time required for
an in  situ  sensor (3 months to 1 year).  -Recently fluoroimmunoassay FOCS have
been tested by Vo-Dinh et al. (1989)  using enzyme coatings.  Klainer et al.
(1988)  recently developed a gasoline sensor based on changes in the refractive
index  of a  proprietary cladding material, due to absorption of the light
aromatics  in  the  gasoline by  the cladding.

     The current  status of FOGS have been discussed in a number of recent
references  by Wolfbeis in Schulman  (1988), Eccles and Eastwood  (1988), Klainer
et  al. in  Wolfbeis (1990), Vo-Dinh  et al. in Wolfbeis  (1990) and others.
Feasibility studies  have been performed on many pollutant  sensors including
chloroform, gasoline,  pH,  ammonia,  benzo(a)pyrene, aluminum, cyanide,
actinides,  and sulfur dioxide,   only a few of these sensors have proven rugged
enough for long-term field testing  and commercialization.  Progress  is needed
in the area of remote sensors because of the  tremendous need  for continuous
environmental monitoring and the large potential  cost  savings provided by
remote sensors in contrast to more conventional analytical techniques.
                                       84

-------
CONCLUSIONS

     Although there is no reason FOCS cannot eventually prove satisfactory for
environmental monitoring and  screening applications, there may be delays
because of the many practical and engineering problems that must be solved
before FOCS can be rugged,  reliable, and inexpensive enough for general field
deployment and commercialization.   If chemical sensors rather than remote
spectroscopy approaches are to be used, a wide variety of reliable chemical
sensors must be developed for the major pollutants.  The technology requires
better UV fibers  and  sources, or else chemical reactions to move spectral
responses into the visible  region.   Other important areas for research and
development include:   better  instrumentation with miniaturization of all
components of the FOCS system; peer-accepted calibration, characterization and
performance standards through organizations such as the American Society of
Testing  and Materials (ASTM); improved reagent immobilization and polymer
membrane  technology:  and  improved methods and systems of optical coupling such
as  improved molded optics or  nonimaging optics.  Development of satisfactory
FOCS requires  interdisciplinary research teams, which might include analytical
chemists, polymer and dye chemists, molecular spectroscopists, optical
physicists, optical  and mechanical  engineers, material scientists, and
hydrologists.  Appropriate  instrumentation  and laboratory support facilities
are also required.   Currently, few of  the research  groups developing FOCS have
such complete teams.

      FOCS can be thought of as light pipes,  combined with detection by
colorimetrie or  fluorometric reagents  or by measuring changes  in  some optical
property of the  fiber or the protective  cladding.   Although of  great potential
 long-term applicability to ground-water  monitoring,  some  sensors  are closer to
 field testing and commercialization than others,   some FOCS  are currently
 being field tested and evaluated (pH,  temperature,  conductivity,  alkali
 metals,  and gasoline).  Other FOCS are still under development and may require

                                       85

-------
several years of research and development  as well as engineering improvements
before they can be applied  in the  field.   For some sensors, immobilization of
the coatings and reversibility,  stability,  and specificity of the reagents are
still problems to be  addressed  in  the  research laboratory.  At present, vapor-
phase sensors are more developed than  true liquid-phase sensors.

     The small sizes  of  fiber optic  sensors could allow smaller diameter
(1/2") monitoring wells  to  be drilled  at  substantial cost savings.  Despite
the problems which remain to be overcome,  remote fiber optic sensors have an
important  future in continuous  environmental monitoring of ground water.

     In addition to FOCS, in situ  spectroscopy, using fiber optic probes, is a
possibility  for most  of  the spectroscopic techniques discussed in this report.
                                       86

-------
                                  REFERENCES


     This reference section contains all references cited and an additional
selection of definitive references  that should provide the reader with a basic
understanding of fiber optic chemical  sensors.


Bright, F. V., Litwiler,  K. S.,  "Multicomponent Fluorometric Analysis Using a
Fiber-optic Probe," Anal.  Chen.,  Vol.  61,  1989, pp  1510-1513.

Burgess, L. w., Fuh, M. S., and Christian,  G., "Use of Analytical Fluorescence
with Fiber optics," Progress in Analytical Luminescence, ASTM STP 1009, D.
Eastwood and L. J. cline-Love,  Eds., American Society for Testing and
Materials, Philadelphia,  1988,  pp 100-110.

Carroll, M. K., Bright, F. V.,  Hieftje, G.  M., "Luminescence originating in an
Optical Fiber," Appl. Spectrosc., Vol. 43,  No. 1,  1989,  pp  176-178.

Dessy, R. E., "Waveguides as Chemical  Sensors," Anal. Chem., Vol. 61, No.  19,
1989, pp 1079-1094.

Eastwood, D., Lidberg, R., Simon, S.,  and  Vo-Dinh,  T.,  "An  Overview of
Advanced Spectroscopic Field Screening and In-Situ Monitoring Instrumentation
and Methods" proceedings  of the chemistry  for the  protection of the
Environment Conference, Lublin, Poland,  1989.

Eccles, L. A.f  and Eastwood, D., "Rationale for  In Situ Environmental
Monitoring with Fiber Optics," SPIE Meeting,  FACSS, Boston,  1988.

Ferrell, T. L., Arakawa,  E. T., Gammage,  R. B.,  James D. R., Goudonnet, J. P.,
Reddick, R. c., Haas, J.  w., and Wachter,  E.  A.,  "Fiber-Optic Surface-Enhanced
Raman  System  for  Field  Screening of Hazardous Compounds,"  Proceedings First
International symposium on Field Screening Methods for  Hazardous Waste  site
investigations,  1988,  pp 41-42.

Guided wave,  "Laboratory Determination of octane Number in Gasoline by  NIR
Analysis," Application  Brief IB2-289,  Guided Wave, El Dorado Hills, CA,  1989.


Herron,  N., Cardenas,  D., Hankins, W., Curtis,  J., Simon,  S.,  and Eccles,  L.,
 "Modification,  calibration, and Field Test of a Chloroform Specific Fiber
optic  Chemical  Sensor,"  Chemical Research Service, 1990.

Klainer,  S.  M., Dandge,  D.  K., Goswami, K., Eccles, L.  A.,  and Simon, S. J.,
 "A Fiber Optic  Chemical Sensor (FOCS)  for Monitoring Gasoline," In  Situ
Monitoring with Fiber Optics, Part 3,  a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
pub.,  EPA/600/X-88/259,  1988, pp 1-39.

Klainer,  S.  M., Goswami,  K., Dandge,  D. K., Simon, S.  J., Herron, N.  R.,
 Eastwood,  D.,  and Eccles, L. A.  "Environmental Monitoring Applications  of
 Fiber Optic chemical Sensors (FOCS)," chemical Sensors, o.  s.  Wolfbeis,  Ed.,
 CRC,  Boca Raton,  in Handbook of  Fiber-Optic. FL, 1990.

 Milanovitch,  F. P., Garvis, D. G., Angel, s. M., Klainer, s. M.,  and  Eccles,
 L. A., "Remote Detection  of organochloridea with a Fiber Optic Based  sensor,"
 Analytical instrumentation,  15(2), 1986, pp  137-147.


                                       87

-------
Murphy, E. M., and Hostetler,  D. D., -Evaluation of Chemical Sensors for In
Situ Ground-Water  Monitoring at the Hanford Site, "Pacific Northwest
Laboratory Report  PNL-6854  (UC-403), Prepared for the U.S. Department of
Energy by Battelle Memorial Institute, March 1989.

Olsen, K. B., Griffin,  J. w.,  Nelson, D. A., Matson, B. S., and Eschbach, P.
A., "Prototype Design and Testing of Two Fiber-optic Spectrochemical Emission
Sensors," Proceedings Field Screening Methods for Hazardous Haste Site
Investigations,  1988,
pp 117-125.

Seitz, W. R., "Chemical sensors Based on Fiber  Optics," Anal. Chem., Vol. 56,
No. 1, 1984, pp  16-34.

seitz, w. R., "Chemical Sensors Based on Fiber  Optics," Sensors, August  1985,
pp 6-9.

Seitz, W. R., "In  Situ Detection of contaminant Plumes in Groundwater,"
submitted for publication in USA CRREL.

smith, D. S., Hassan, M., and  Nargessi, R. D.,  "Principles and Practice  of
Fluoroiromunoassay  Procedures," in Modern Fluorescence Spectroscopy 3. E. L.
Wehry, Ed.,  Plenum, NY, 1981,  pp  143-192.

Vo-Dinh, T., Tromberg,  B. J.,  Griffin, G.  D., Ambrose, K. R., Sepaniak,  M. J.,
and Gardenhire,  E. M.,  Appl. Spectrosc., Vol. 41,  1987, p 735.

wolfbeis, o.s.,  "Fiber Optical Fluorosensors in Analytical and clinical
Chemistry,"  Molecular Luminescence  Spectroscopv. Methods and Applications;
Part  2.  S.  G. Schulman, Ed., John Wiley  &  Sons, NY,  1988, p  129.

Wolfbeis, O.S.,  "Fluorescence  Optical  Sensors in Analytical Chemistry,"  Trends
in Analytical Chemistry, Vol.  4,  No.  7,  1985, pp  184-188.

Wolfbeis, O.S.,  "The Development  of Fiber  Optic Chemical Sensors by
Immobilization  of Fluorescent  Probes," Applied  Fluorescence Technology,  Vol.
1, No.  1,  1989,  pp 1-6.

Zhang,  Y.,  seitz,  w. R., Grant,  C.  L.,  and Sundberg, D.,  "A clean Amine-
containing  Poly (vinyl chloride)  Membrane  for  In  Situ Optical Detection  of
2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene," Anal.  Chim. Acta,  Vol.  217,  1989, pp 217-227.

Zhang,  Y.  and Seitz, w. R., "Single Fiber Absorption Measurements for Remote
Detection of 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene,"  Anal. Chim.  Acta, Vol.  221,  1989, pp 1-9.
                                       88

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

            TYPICAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANT SPECTRA FOR SOME MAJOR
                            SPECTROSCOPIC TECHNIQUES


Number                                                                    PAGE

A-l  Excitation  and emission fluorescence spectra of benzo(a)pyrene.        2
A-2  Room-temperature  fluorescence of pyrene, benzo(e)pyrene and            3
     benzo(a)pyrene.
A-3  Room-temperature  synchronous fluorescence of No. 6 and                 4
     No. 2  fuel  oils.
A-4  Fluorescence  spectra  of phenol                                         5
             (a)  Excitation and emission fluorescence spectra
             (b)  Synchronous fluorescence spectrum
             (c)  Second-derivative synchronous fluorescence spectrum
A-5  Second-derivative synchronous fluorescence spectrum of phenol and      6
     p-cresol  (Avl=3 nm)
A-6  Room-temperature  phosphorescence spectra of acridine with and without  7
     silver nitrate as a heavy-atom perturber.
A-7  Room-temperature  phosphorescence spectra of fluoranthene using several 8
     heavy-atom  agents.
A-8  Room-temperature  phosphorescence spectra of a multicomponent mixture   9
     of fluorene (FLu), phenanthrene (Phe), chrysene (chy), Benzo(e)pyrene
     (BeP),  Dibenzanthracene (DBA) and pyrene (Py), using excitation at
      295 nm and 300 nm.
A-9  Room-temperature  phosphorescence of uranyl ion complexed with a       10
     proprietary complex (Uraplex J.
A-10 Low-temperature  (77 K)  phosphorescence of 2-chlorobiphenyl, 4-chloro- 11
     biphenyl  and  biphenyl (note 2nd order LT-fluorescence of biphenyl).
A-ll Low-temperature  (77 K)  phosphorescence of 4-chlorobiphenyl and        12
     4-bromobiphenyl.
A-12 Low-temperature  (77 K}  phosphorescence of Aroclor 1221 and            13
     Aroclor 1248.
A-13 Schematic of  GC-FTIR  instrumentation.                                 14
A-14 FTIR vapor  phase  absorbance spectra of DDT                            15
     (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane). (D. Gurka, EPA-EMSL-LV)
A-15 GC-FTZR vapor spectra for  2,3,6-trichlorotoluene.                     16
     (D. Gurka,  EPA-EMSL-LV)
A-16 GC-FTIR spectra search comparison {D. Gurka, EPA-EMSL-LV)             17
             (a)  Soil  extract identified as p-chlorotoluene
             (b)  Authentic vapor phase IR spectrum of p-chlorotoluene.
A-17 Schematic of  laser-Raman spectrophotometer.                           18
A-18 Surface-enhanced  Raman scattering (SERS) spectrum of perylene.        19
A-19 surface-enhanced  Raman scattering (SERS) spectrum of methyl           20
     parathion.  The €47.1 nm line of a krypton laser was used for
     excitation.   A silver-coated microsphere substrate was used.

-------
                                                                         LESC-LV
                                  BENZO[a]PYRENE
(
-3L
Ul
      EXCITATION
      EM - 42B nm
           .9,4.3 nm
  300
               EMISSION
               EX a 330 nm
               BP a 4.3,.9 nm
   400
WAVELENGTH (nm)
        Figure A-l.  Excitation and emission fluorescence  spectra of benzo(a)pyrene.

-------
                                                       LESC-LV
                          PYRENE
z
tu
UJ
o
UJ
O
C/>
UJ
cc
o
                      EX = 330 nm
                      BP = 4.3,3.9 nm
                      1 ug/mL In CH
                      RT • EMISSION
BENZO[e]PYRENE
                      BENZO[a]PYRENE
   350    375    400
  425    450    475    500
   WAVELENGTH (nm)
525    550
 Figure A-2.  Room-temperature fluorescence of pyrene,  benzo(e)pyrene and
            benzo(a)pyrene.

-------
                                                        LESC-LV
      * 6 FUEL OIL
 z
 UJ
 111
 o
 z
 111
 o
 (0
 111
 c
 o
# 2 FUEL OIL
                                       : 6 nm

                                    BP = 2.1 nm

                                    1  ug/mL In CH

                                    RT - SYNCHRO.
          300
             350     400     450     500


                   WAVELENGTH (nm)
550
600
Figure A-3.  Room-temperature synchronous fluorescence of No.  6 and Ho. 2

            fuel oils.

-------
                                      ORNL-DWG 78-3313
                                I   r
                       (•)        /* FLUORESCENCE SIGNAL

                      EXCITIATION / .          OUPMOI
                      SPECTRUM  /  t          PHENOL
                                              OH
                       I  I  1
                 tn
                 z
                 UJ
                 H
                 Z

                 111
                 Ul
                 (£
                       I  I  I  I   I  I  I  |  I  I  I  I

                       (b)       SYNCRONOUS SIGNAL
                       '   I
                               I  I  I
                                          I  •  I  I  '  I
1   I  |   I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I  I  |

(C)     0* . SYNCRONOUS SIGNAL
                                                    I  I
                           250        300         350

                                WAVELENGTH (nm)
Figure A-4.  Fluorescence spectra of phenol
             (a)   Excitation and emission fluorescence spectra
             (b)   synchronous fluorescence spectrum
             (c)   second-derivative synchronous  fluorescence spectrum

-------
                                             ORNL-DWG 78-3310
        O

        55

        Ul
        O
        (A «
        UJ e
        oc o
        O ?

         o
         oc
         X
         o
         z

         (/>
         •
         CM
         O
                                             - P-CRESOL    —
                              288
                   I    l    I    I    I    i    I   l    I    l
                  260     280      300      320     340

                            WAVELENGTH (nm)
Figure A-5.  Second-derivative synchronous fluorescence spectrum of phenol and
            p-cresol (AX=3 run)

-------
                                                 ORNL-DWG 77-11155
        I   I   I   |   I   I   I   I   |   I   I   I   I   |   I  I  I  I  |   I
9

••

—
"3
<  3
Z
g
35
ui
o

ui  2
O
ff
o
X
a.
              ACRIDINE
                  A = WITH Ag*

                  B = WITHOUT Ag*
        I   I   I   I   I   I   I   I   I   I   I   I   I
                           tl   1
                500
600
700
800
                           WAVELENGTH (nm)
Figure A-6.   Room-temperature phosphorescence spectra of acridine with and
             without silver nitrate as a heavy-atom perturber.

-------
                                          ORNL-OWG 78-16839
        in
        *•
        "E
        D
        m
        k
        «-
        s
        z
        o
        UJ
        O
        Z
        UJ
        O
        (0
        UJ
        £C
        O
        X
        0.
        (0
        O
        X
        a.
                     I    I   I    I    |   I    I   I   I


                            RTF OF FLUORANTHENE
                                            NO HEAVY ATOM

               I   I   I   I   I    I   I   I   I  I   I   I    I
                 500              600

                           WAVELENGTH (rim)
700
Figure A-7.  Room-temperature phosphorescence spectra of  fluoranthene using
             several heavy-atom agents.

-------
                                               ORNL-DWG 78-16834
                               r~i—n—pi—i—i—r~r
                                   T
  18
   16
   14
S 12
v
•*
c

   10
0)
=  8

o.
H
DC
    6
T—]—r—n—r
 RTF ANALYSIS
 HEAVY ATOM: Csl
                                 BeP
                                      DBA
                X   = 330 um
                     295 um
  chy
           400
500             600

 WAVELENGTH (nm)
                                                  700
Figure A-8.  Room-temperature phosphorescence spectra of a multicomponent
            mixture of fluorene (FLu),  phenanthrene (Phe), chrysene (chy),
            Benzo(e)pyrene (BeP), Dibenzanthracene (DBA) and pyrene (Py),
            using excitation at 295 nm and 300 nm.

-------
                                                                        LESC-LV
z
Ul
H
Z
                                    URANYL
EX = 420 nm

BP = 4.3,0.9 nm

210 ng/mL in URAPLEX

RT - PHOSPHOR.
  450      475       500      525      550      575

                                WAVELENGTH (nm)
   600
625
650
Figure A-9.  Room-temperature^phosphorescence of uranyl ion complexed with a proprietary
           complex  (Uraplex ).

-------
Z
UJ
UJ
U
Z
UJ
o
CO
UJ
DC
O
I
o.
CO
o
     2-CI  BIPHENYL
	LESC-LV


EX = 270 nm

8P a 4.5,0.9 nm

15 ug/mL in HEPTANE

LT • EMISSION

77 K
     4-CI BIPHENYL
     BIPHENYL
  380   414    448    481    515    549    583    616    650

                         WAVELENGTH (nm)
Figure A-10.   Low-temperature (77  K) phosphorescence of  2-chlorobiphenyl,
             4-chloro-biphenyl and biphenyl  (note 2nd order LT-
             fluorescence of biphenyl).
                                11

-------
   CO

   Z
   111
  111
  o
  Z
  111
  o
  CO
  III
  cc
  o
  Z
  o.
  CO
  o
  Z
  a.
        4-CI BIPHENYL
                                     	LESC-LV


                                     EX = 270 nm

                                     BP = 4.5,0.9 nm

                                     15 ug/mL in HEPTANE

                                     LT • EMISSION

                                     77 K
4-Br BIPHENYL
    380    414    448    481    515    549    583   616    650


                           WAVELENGTH (nm)
Figure A-ll.  Low-temperature (77 K) phosphorescence of 4-chlorobiphenyl and
             4-bromobiphenyl.
                                 12

-------
                                                        LESC-LV
CO
z
01
IU
o
z
UJ
o

IU
cc
o
X
Q.
CO
O
X
a.
      AROCLOR 1221
                                         EX = 270 nm

                                         BP = 4.5,0.9 nm

                                         15ug/mL in MCH

                                         LT - EMISSION

                                         77 K
AROCLOR 1248
  380    414     448     481    515    549    583    616    650

                         WAVELENGTH (nm)
Figure A-12.  Low-temperature (77 K) phosphorescence of Aroclor  1221 and
             Aroclor 1248.
                                13

-------
IR SOURCE
                      INTERFEROMETER
                                   MCT DETECTOR
 MIRROR
                             LIGHT PIPE
        MIRROR
   GC
DETECTOR
                                         MIRROR
                                            INLET
                        GAS CHROMATOGRAPH



  Figure A-13.  schematic of GC-FTIR instrumentation.

-------
   .52 -i
   .41 -
ui
o
Z  .30
<
CD
K
O
CO
CD  .19
   .08 -
.03
  4000
                  CCI3
               -1-     ~T~
              3600   3200
2800   2400    2000    1600

       WAVENUMBERS
 -T-     T~
1200    800      400
   Figure A-14.  FTIR vapor phase abaorbance spectra of DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane)

               (D. GUrka, EPA-EMSL-LV)

-------
    3.0 -i
g   2-°
OQ
DC
O

m
S  1.0 -
    0.0 -
       4000
3000                    2000

           WAVENUMBERS
1000  750
   Figure A-15.  GC-FTIR vapor spectra  for 2,3,6-trichlorotoluene. (D. Gurka, EPA-EMSL-LV)

-------
           8-OOOOn
        Z
        o

        I
        Z
        Ul
        \u
        O
        Z
        <
        03
        CC
        O
        CO
        CD
           1.2999
                                    (a)
                                                  V/vJ
                      3200
           1.4000-1
         Z
         o

         I
         •Z
         UJ
         IIJ
         O
         Z
         <
         o
         E
         O
         Ifl
         GO
          -0.1399
                    2400        1600

                     WAVENUMBERS
    800
                 3200
                2400        1600

                 WAVENUMBERS
800
Figure A-16.
GC-FTIR spectra  search comparison (D. Gurka, EPA-EMSL-LV)
(a)  soil extract identified as p-chlorotoluene
(b)  Authentic vapor phase  IR spectrum of p-chlorotoluene.
                                   17

-------
MONOCHROMETER
                                                    SAMPLE
                                                 COMPARTMENT
                                                      DETECTOR
      Figure A-17.  Schematic of laser-Raman opectrophotometer.

-------
    8
                                                              ORNL-DWG 86-10164
±!   6
"E
3
£T  5
a
    4
t   3
(/)
z
UJ
                      SERS SPECTRUM
                         PERYLENE
   0
    200
          I	I
           I     I    I
I
I
I         I
I
400      600       800      1000     1200
                    RAMAN SHIFT (cm'1)
                     1400
                          1600
                           1800
       Figure A-18.  surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) spectrum of perylene.

-------
K>
               (A



               I
               V)
               z
               Ul
               oc
               ui
               IA
                         PARATHION, METHYL

                                 S
                          (CH3O)2*P-O
                         SILVER-MICROSPHERE SUBSTRATE
                         EXC. 647.1 nm (Kr LASER)
                   200      400      600      800      1000     1200

                                                RAMAN SHIFT (cm-1)
1400
1600
1800
             Figure A-19.  surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS)  spectrum of  methyl parathion.
                          The 647.1 nm line of a krypton laser was  used for excitation.
                          A silver-coated microsphere substrate was used.

-------