s-fc
1969
APPENDIX
68
70
71
72
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
-------
TOE COST OF CLEAN WATER AND ITS
ECONOMIC IMPACT
Volume II
APPENDIX
U. S. Department of the Interior
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
January 10, 1969
-------
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office
Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $4.75
11
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
INTRODUCTION 1
GLOSSARY 8
UNITED STATES SUMMARY TABLES 9
Table A-2 10
Table A-3 11
Table A-4 12
Table A-5 13
Table A-6 14
Table A-7 15
Table A-8 f 16
STATE TABLES 17
Alabama 18
Alaska 24
Arizona 30
Arkansas 36
California 42
Colorado 49
Connecticut 56
Delaware 63
District of Columbia 70
Florida 76
Georgia 82
Guam 88
Hawaii 91
Idaho 98
Illinois 105
Indiana 112
Iowa 119
Kansas 126
Kentucky 133
Louisiana 140
Maine 146
Maryland 153
Massachusetts 160
Michigan 167
Minnesota 174
Mississippi 181
Missouri 187
111
-------
STATE TABLES (continued)
Montana 194
Nebraska 201
Nevada 208
New Hampshire 215
New Jersey 221
New Mexico 227
New York 233
North Carolina 240
North Dakota 247
Ohio 254
Oklahoma 261
Oregon 267
Pennsylvania 274
Puerto Rico 281
Rhode Island 287
South Carolina 294
South Dakota 301
Tennessee 308
Texas 315
Utah 321
Vermont 328
Virginia 334
Virgin Islands 341
Washington 344
West Virginia 351
Wisconsin 358
Wyoming 365
MAJOR RIVER BASIN TABLES 373
Northeast 374
North Atlantic 379
Southeast 384
Tennessee River 389
Ohio River 394
Lake Erie 399
Upper Mississippi 404
Western Great Lakes 409
Mississippi River 414
Lowest Lower Mississippi 419
Colorado River 424
Western Gulf 429
IV
-------
MAJOR RIVER BASIN TABLES (continued)
Pacific Northwest 434
California 439
Great Basin 444
Alaska 449
Hawaii 454
Puerto Rico 459
Virgin Islands 464
STATE AGENCY COMMENTS 467
INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION COMMENTS 513
-------
INTRODUCTION
The 1968 Inventory of Municipal Waste Facilities will when completed
provide a current assessment of what progress the nation is making
toward providing waste treatment for all of its sewered population.
At this writing the 1968 inventory is only partially complete. The
raw basic data are in but there still remains the task of verifying
and checking the individual State material. For the analyses in
Volume I, 1968 data for five States - Arkansas, Iowa, New Jersey,
New York, and Pennsylvania were not available. Since the data for
1968 are subject to verification and change, caution should be
exercised in using any individual State data. As soon as the
inventory has been completely checked the data will be published
by FWPCA as in previous years.
Comments from State Agencies and Industrial Organizations
on The Cost of Clean Water
Copies of last year's study, The Cost of Clean Water, were distributed
to the various State water pollution control agencies through FWPCA's
regional offices. Although comments were requested from all recipients,
only 27 States or agencies replied. Table A-l summarizes their comments
and their individual replies are included on pages 468 through 511.
FWPCA also asked several industrial organizations for their comments
on last year's report. Their replies are included on pages 514
through 541.
The tables developed for this volume are based on the 1962 Inventory
of Municipal Waste Facilities, preliminary data for the 1968 Inventory
of Municipal Waste Facilities, and Contract Awards data covering
sewerage construction for the period 1962-1967, inclusive.
These tables were prepared to provide an insight into the progress
achieved between January 1, 1962 and January 1, 1968; the dates
of the 1962 and 1968 Municipal Waste Facilities Inventories. FWPCA
hopes the information developed here becomes part of the analytical
base for further studies that will be conducted by many individuals
in the water resources area, especially in private research agencies,
and in academic institutions. The information also should provide
useful guides to industrial manufacturing concerns as to those
markets with the greatest sales potential.
-------
TABLE A-l
SIMttRY OF STATE COMMENTS TO 1966 REPORT
FNPCA ESTIMATE GENERAL
COMMENTS NO
HIGH LOW REASONABLE ONLY REPLY
Alabaaa X
Alaska X
Arizona X
Arkansas X
California X
Colorado X
Connecticut X
Delaware X
District of Colunbia X
Florida X
Georgia X
Hawaii X
Idaho X
Illinois X
Indiana X
Iowa X
Kansas X
Kentucky X
Louisiana X
Maine X
Maryland X
Massachusetts X
Michigan X
Minnesota X
Mississippi X
Missouri X
Montana X
Nebraska X
Nevada X
New Hampshire X
New Jersey X
New Mexico X
New York X
North Carolina X
North Dakota X
Ohio X
Oklahoma X
Oregon X
Pennsylvania X
Rhode Island X
South Carolina X
South Dakota X
Tennessee X
Texas X
Utah X
Vermont X
Virginia X
Washington X
Nest Virginia X
Wisconsin X
Wyoming X
-------
To facilitate use, the tables are presented in three sections. All
the United States summary tables appear in the first series. These
are followed by State tables with all the available tables for each
State included. As indicated above a complete set of tables for all
States was not compiled because the 1968 data for some States were
not available. The last series of tables cover the major river basins,
As for each State, a similar set of tables was prepared except for
data on contract awards and the implementation plans summary. The
river basin breakdown used for the tables is shown in Figure A-l.
A glossary of terms used in the tables appears on page 8.
TABLE A-2
1962 Municipal Waste Inventory
This table shows the type of treatment and population served as
indicated in the 1962 inventory. The data have been arrayed by
the size of community providing the treatment. The 1960 census
population of the community was used in all cases. If the community
did not have a defined census population, the information was listed
in the unknown category shown in the table. In most instances, these
"communities" are sanitary districts created to provide the necessary
waste treatment services to a geographical area which may be either
part of a political subdivision (i.e., city, town, etc.) or may
cross over several political boundaries. In the future an attempt
will be made to associate as many "unknown communities" as possible
in their proper population size categories.
Tables A-2A and 2B present the same information on an individual
State and river basin basis, respectively.
TABLE A-3
Contract Awards 1962-1967
FWPCA obtains and records, as part of its basic data program, infor-
mation relating to contracts awarded in three types of public works
construction - sewage treatment works, collecting sewers, and water-
works. These data provide a continuing and ready reference as to
how successfully the national needs in municipal pollution control
are being met through construction of the necessary physical facili-
ties. Table A-3 presents the accumulated expenditures for sewage
treatment works and collecting sewers for the period 1962 through
1967. Data for the year 1967 are preliminary. Generally, except
for the miscellaneous category, the various classes of construction
activity are self- explanatory. The miscellaneous category includes
those contracts which cover more than one of the major categories
listed except sewers.
-------
MAJOR RIVER BASINS OF THE UNITED STATES
01 NORTHEAST
02 NORTH ATLANTIC
03 SOUTHEAST
04 TENNESSEE RIVER
05 OHIO RIVER
06 LAKE ERIE
07 UPPER MISSISSIPPI
08 WESTERN GREAT LAKES
09 MISSOURI RIVER
10 SOUTHWEST-LOWER MISS.
11 COLORADO RIVER 16 ALASKA
12 WESTERN GULF 17 HAWAII
13 PACIFIC NORTHWEST 18 PUERTO RICO
14 CALIFORNIA 19 VIRGIN ISLANDS
15 GREAT BASIN
Figure A-1
-------
The population size groups in this table do not refer to popula-
tion served as in several other tables. They represent the size
of the community in which the contracts were awarded. The contracts
which fall into the unknown group involve mostly schools, hospitals,
military bases, and parks.
Table A-3A provides the contract awards information for the
1962-1967 period on an individual State basis.
TABLE A-4
1968 Municipal Waste Inventory
Table A-4 includes the same basic information for 1968 as Table A-2
did for 1962.
Tables A-4A and 4B present the 1968 data on an individual State and
river basin basis, respectively.
TABLE A-5
Ratio of Design Loading/Domestic Loading
Perhaps the most interesting of the tables included in this volume
are the two ratio tables, A-5 and A-6. These tables are of particu-
lar importance in that they raise many questions which will require
further breakdown and analysis of the data.
During the analysis the question came up as to how much capacity
exists or is built into the nation's waste treatment plants. This
table presents the ratio of the design population to the population
served. For example, if a waste treatment plant was designed for
1000 persons and is serving 1000 persons, the ratio would be 1.0;
if designed for 1200 and serving 1000, the ratio would be 1.2 and
so forth.
Time did not permit an analysis of the data to determine which
factors exert the most influence on design size. Some of the factors
to be explored are the necessities for: (a) providing for population
growth only, (b) providing for combined sewer system overflows, and
(c) accommodating industrial discharges.
Tables A-5A and 5B show the data on a State and river basin basis,
respectively.
-------
TABLE A-6
Ratio of Indicated Loading/Domestic Loading
This table provides a beginning analysis of the measure or impact
of industrial discharges to municipal waste treatment plants.
The data used to determine the ratio were the actual average
daily conditions reported in the 1968 inventory survey.
For example, if the waste stream entering the plant is based
on the normal wasteload for 1000 persons and the population
served was also 1000 persons the ratio would be 1.0. This would
be interpreted as an indication of no industrial wastewater dis-
charges to municipal facilities. Ratios above 1.0 may be indicative
of some discharge of industrial wastes to municipal sewers with
increases in the ratio increasing the likelihood that industrial
wastes were being treated in the municipal treatment plant.
Tables A-6A and 6B reflect the data on an individual State and river
basin, respectively.
TABLE A-7
Joint Treatment Facilities
This table was prepared to examine the extent to which communities
join together to provide waste treatment services.
The number and size of the communities providing waste treatment
to others are shown in the upper section of the table. In the
lower part the number and size of the communities receiving
waste treatment services are shown. Because of inconsistencies
between the 1962 and 1968 inventories regarding joint treatment,
the data presented here are based on the 1962 Inventory only.
The table may be interpreted as follows:
For category 6, population 25,000 - 49,999 range, there are 62
communities providing waste treatment services to others.
Thirty-seven provide secondary treatment, 24 provide primary
treatment, and one provides no treatment. The total population
served is 2,341,502. These 62 communities perform this service
for 107 communities with a total population served of 833,788.
The 107 communities range in size from category 1 to category 7.
(Note: For the 1962 Inventory, only eight population size groups
were used. Communities with a population of 100,000 and over which
provide waste treatment for others fall in category 8).
Tables A-7A and 7B show the data on an individual State and river
basin basis, respectively.
-------
TABLE A-8
Implementation Plans Summary
The implementation plans submitted with the State Water Quality
Standards generally set forth the State's proposed plan to
accomplish the Standards applicable to interstate and coastal
waters. The data were organized into a standard format for ease
in processing and assessing progress in future years. Because of
problems encountered, all of the information was not available for
analysis. Therefore, caution should be used in evaluation of this
material on an individual State basis.
Data for the individual States are shown in Tables A-8A.
-------
GLOSSARY
Community - a named place to which a census population was attached.
Communities Served - a named place receiving waste treatment.
Design Loading - the waste flow, in teims of average water volume
on oxygen demand for which a facility was designed.
Domestic Loading - the calculated waste flow or oxygen demand for
a human population of the size known to be connected
to a facility.
Facility - a treatment plant or, in the case of raw discharge, the
collection system.
Indicated Loading - the actual waste flow or oxygen demand from all
sources (i.e., people, industry, and all other
connected sources) served by a facility.
No Treatment - includes collection systems discharging raw waste or
discharging wastes after minor treatment only, such as
screening and/or grit removal.
Primary Treatment - removal of solids by settling and skimming, includes
"intermediate" treatment where chemicals are added
to facilitate the process.
Secondary Treatment - biological stabilization of organic solids in
solution or suspension, including oxidation ponds
and tertiary or advanced waste treatment.
8
-------
UNITED STATES SUGARY TABLES
-------
TABLE A-2
RUN DATE 68/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
UNITED STATES
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
0 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>50000p
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
88
287
423
798
423
270
227
114
51
41
17
27
2,766
# OF POPULA- TOTAL
COMMUNITIES TION # OF
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED PLANTS
66
257
402
710
365
230
204
90
40
22
8
8
2,402
5,422,070
1,126,116
275,799
1, 100, 112
1,127,463
1,448,131
3,211,197
3,600,829
2,794,180
3,756,309
3,043,975
13,728,640
40,634,821
257
710
959
1,603
1,061
819
681
212
100
63
58
112
6,635
III OF POPULA-
COMMUNIT1ES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
165
612
897
1,448
930
698
491
145
64
34
13
8
5,505
4,997,805
214,911
864,111
2,415,684
3,298,841
4,827,306
7,440,426
5,329,257
4,580,580
4,854,605
4,271,630
18,385,540
61,480,696
NO. OF
COMMUNI-
TIES
24
206
403
709
320
207
119
36
23
14
4
3
2,068
POPULATION
SERVED
1,043,065
66,328
279,931
984,491
1,006,203
1,271,873
1,850,03!)
1,082,125
1,646,110
1,786,140
1,406,905
3,610,700
16,233,906
-------
TABLE A-3
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
100,000-250iOOO....
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 1,049
....... 1,290
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 23
....... 177
TOTAL
63,775,301
94,357,423
137,542, 141
353 , 338, 323
385,766, 571
588. 347. 1 40
722,460, 382
520,040, 993
480, 669, 932
480 ,876,538
1, 371, 278, 289
5,198,448,033 2
INTERCEPTORS
4,439,109
7, 211, 361
11 ,284,948
43,083, 285
52 ,341, 213
86,209,933
103, 343,050
89,639, 498
109,908,609
34,698, 875
369,882, 885
962,042,766
NUMBER
233
150
?1 7
A-1C
">~IL.
yy?
1 7*»
qc
07
65
go
.AKt
NUMBER
28
41
73
94
87
80
95
73
55
53
173
854
NEW PLANTS
14»576t357
16? 395 1 883
•%-f CrtO „ 1 tifl
on nnA.om
1 ft u ?4Q . m R
77 .AA^t .&Q R
7A Qflfl 1 fi7
R t . os#» . 77#i
i 7n WAP .n&^t
Rl •( ?R^ (^ClA 1
OUTFALL
2,033,128
7. 1 n7.?<5<5
•* . 97? .991
6,436,549
1 1 »7O7 .OB7
11 ,016,583
19, 846,236
22,414,327
13,001 ,512
16, 785,158
57,776 ,351
167,092,177 2
NUMBER
35
279
273
265
106
7*;
49
19
21
11
16
. 1 49
NUMBER
66
\
1°9
307
224
230
263
146
132
114
180
,032
LAGOONS
1,295,258
8,609,913
12,258,742
19 ,416,016
9, 576,696
9 ,758,343
8,01 1,074
3,263, 746
3 ,255,685
1,322, 524
2 ,040,390
78,808, 387
MISCELLANEOUS
3,553,592
10 ,033,780
14,41 1, 387
36,722,601
39,129,298
41 ,039,902
63 ,723,717
35,276,877
35 ,455, 740
37,081,639
105 ,076, 645
421,506,178
NUMBER
147
35
90
199
217
268
318
168
136
121
300
1 ,999
NUMBER
517
536
536
1,228
1 ,338
1,991
3,272
2. 126
1, 965
2,063
4,916
20,488 2,
REPL.6 ADOS
13,388,806
4,262,221
6,654,006
24,858,052
36,951,614
75,723,627
91 ,256,412
HI, 092, 947
58,695,036
80,511 ,072
173,213,686
646,607,479
SEWERS
24,489,051
45, 737,010
61 ,450,917
142,820,885
156,914,019
251 ,304, 154
328,030,378
216,270,100
18^,444,243
204,220 ,494
492,426, 289
107,107,540
-------
TABLE A-4
1960 CENSUS
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
UNITED STATES
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N n
PRFI.
TRFATMFNT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
210
258
351
585
359
276
248
101
50
35
13
17
2,503
# OF POPULA- TOTAL
COMMUNITIES TION # OF
SERVED PLANTS
132
240
338
525
314
235
216
77
44
16
8
6
2,151
9,517,723
597,351
250,551
877,989
1,152,148
2,669,685
3,630,570
2,958,290
3,454,770
4,001.880
3,332,950
12,723,405
45,167,312
1,135
1,292
1,509
2,201
1,344
970
744
270
154
77
70
81
9,847
* OF PPPULA-
COMMUNITIFS TinN
SF«VED
722
1.2P5
1,434
?,047
] ,143
807
524
169
71
32
9
8
6,171
11,721,374
1 ,P°9,M7
1,120,049
3,574,638
4,481,444
6,181,041
8,912,606
6,801, *25
6,0*1,542
VEO
4«; (,iq,4ps
253 78.B55
3?? 224,104
457 631, '=16
?ni 6^. MR
114 ' , 4"51 ,°44
69 1,1^0,^0
70 7*7, ^00
« 743,105
0 1,004,570
1 8*2,12*
2 2fO*4,M>0
1 ,501 1", 31 0 , 3*1
-------
TABLE A-5
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
UNITED STATES
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
COMM.
SRVO
0
1416
1587
2379
1320
999
773
2S3
161
85
28
24
9055
NO. OF
PLANTS
0
1889
1870
2755
1495
1128
861
314
188
97
33
32
10662
4. 0
0
321
125
165
79
49
42
7
6
5
2
1
802
-------
TABLE A-6
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
UNITED STATES
INDICATED LOADING X DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
CQMM.
SRVD
0
1607
1740
2571
1402
1067
815
298
168
90
29
27
9814
NO. OF
PLANTS
0
2133
2061
2986
1589
1204
912
330
195
102
. 35
37
11584
0.5
0
531
548
517
250
152
92
29
15
10
4
2
2150
1.0
0
836
813
1300
681
484
341
124
65
30
5
9
4688
\
1.2
0
168
169
258
193
158
141
57
25
11
5
4
1189
NU» ur
1.4
0
93
99
197
118
95
93
25
21
13
3
6
763
ru«cu a
1.6
0
70
96
136
83
91
69
31
20
15
6
4
621
IN S Itt
1,8
0
46
67
115
64
57
42
20
11
6
4
3
435
CAl tliU
2.0
0
53
54
88
47
50
34
13
13
3
6
3
364
KT ^*=Kft
2.5
0
70
67
131
64
47
53
16
14
10
1
3
476
J 1U DM
3.0
0
29
28
64
30
25
12
9
6
3
I
1
208
3.5
0
21
21
42
14
13
11
5
4
0
0
1
132
4.0
0
17
16
31
12
10
7
0
1
1
0
0
95
>4.3
9
199
83
107
33
22
17
1
0
0
3
1
4b3
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7
PRFLIMINARY
cn
UNITED STATES
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
1COOO - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
53COOO AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
CI= 13299:
1
*
12
2
3
7
6900
9
a
i
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3525
2
*
12
3
2
7
17230
14
4
5
3
I
1
0
0
0
0
0
33065
3
*
86
8
32
*6
31C835
110
33
22
44
9
0
2
0
0
0
0
201306
4
*
81
9
24
48
629980
107
15
16
44
22
7
3
0
0
0
0
388132
5
*
108
1C
39
50
2121685
182
13
24
81
23
33
5
3
0
0
0
1C56085
6
*
62
1
24
37
2341502
107
9
7
38
27
16
8
2
0
0
0
833788
7
*
62
5
25
32
4592265
159
13
15
60
27
29
10
4
1
0
0
1252400
9
*
97
13
41
43
4373C259
872
42
40
194
158
235
115
65
13
8
2
20310528
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
* •
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
520 0
51 3639933
I9C 25924316
279 241864C7
0 5375C656
156C 0
137 38724
13T 96570
464 1156616
267 1698899
321 4139265
143 4135486
74 4544044
14 1498655
8 2480165
2 4290405
0 24078829
-------
TABLE A-8
UNITED STATES
(36 State Total OnHy)
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
«^ 800
600-1000
1000-2500
2500-6000
EOOO-10000
10000-25000
25000-60000
6bobo-Tooooo
100000-260000
250000-ECOOOO
^•600000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
19t9
1970
1971
1972
1973 o'r*)ater
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
12
12
7
5
6
ii
3
2
1
1
1
5U
Secondary
203
109
96
11*2
55
10i
111
9
7
5
U
715
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/R.EPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec,
15
31
56
92
53
h2
56
22
8
9
3
6
393
Primary
5
9
5
9
ii
3
8
3
1
U7
Secondary
25
30
i|B
87
U7
£
Ii3
25
10
U
2
1*
376
INTERCEPTORS
28
10
8
15
18
13
13
8
5
5
3
6
132
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
63
28
66
129
65
63
62
25
9
12
6
7
535
Outfall
13
9
8
7
18
8
7
U
U
2
80
Interception
8
3
3
2
5
2
8
1
32
Plant
Y
1
3
9
8
3
6
u
3
£
¥>
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
5
1
U
5
1
i
2
19
Dther
3
ii
k
18
15
9
3
1
li
1
62
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES.
300
20U
265
ML
2h6
221
205
80
36
22
8
13
20i4l
TBTAI. M^Aen
ICHEDULED
FED TIAI
29U
283
315
168
386
312
756
2514
-------
STATE TABLES
17
339-678 O - 69 - 2
-------
TABLE A-2A
CD
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
P K I M A R Y
196Z MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ALABAMA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-50CO
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50COO
50000-100000
100COO-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
3
2
11
27
U
3
3
3
2
1
0
0
69
#
OF PGPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENT
1
2
1C
24
9
3
2
3
1
C
0
0
55
IFIABLE SERVED
460,000
600
6,450
23,980
16,630
12,200
17,000
80,000
50,500
44,000
0
0
711.560
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
3
2
1
8
17
17
17
4
1
5
0
0
75
# OF
COMMUNITIES
IDENTIFIABLE
G
Z
1
5
14
14
9
2
1
1
0
0
49
POPULA-
TION
SERVED
50,500
1,900
800
7,660
36,700
82,500
91,600
65,500
45,000
137,700
0
0
519,860
NO. OF
COMMUNI-
TIES
0
2
2
16
17
6
1
2
1
1
0
0
48
POPULATION
SERVED
0
475
1,050
18,020
41,076
32,200
12,000
36,800
54,000
68,000
0
0
263,623
-------
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP — 1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AMARDS
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
10
0
15
37
48
32
36
30
26
63
40
337
TOTAL
359.764
0
704.814
3.224,356
9.520,834
4,841,378
7.285,430
9.246,036
16.904.010
13,978,757
7.101.792
73,167,171
NUMBER
3
0
1
4
4
1
3
1
4
" 1
0
22
NEW PLANTS
119.321
0
34.606
396.372
1.329.636
376,294
1,596,213
944,400
B. 606, 494
742,340
0
14,145,676
NUMBER
2
0
6
6
9
5
4
0
0
0
0
32
ALABAMA
LAGOONS
56,280
0
241,687
277,346
698,757
448,211
975,645
0
0
0
0
2,697,926
NUMBER
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
0
4
0
10
REPL.G ADOS
3,175
0
0
0
311,870
415.030
135.660
873,219
0
1.102,696
0
2.841.65C
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
0
0
0
2
2
2
0
2
3
3
3
17
INTERCEPTORS
0
0
0
148.897
258.427
147.029
0
1.213,705
3,760,035
1,514,934
491,890
7,534,917
NUMBER
1
0
5
5
10
5
7
3
1
10
4
51
OUTFALL
10,583
0
237,509
417,640
777,174
846,926
2. 630,289
1,501,280
97,306
3,991,637
268,675
10,779,019
NUMBER
1
0
1
8
6
3
3
4
1
3
0
30
MISCELLANEOUS
113, 989
0
64,910
920,124
2,078,477
642,223
353,836
2,263,830
237,260
1,283,556
0
7,958,205
NUMBER
2
0
2
12
16
15
Ifl
16
17
4?
33
175
SEWERS
56.416
0
126,102
1,063, "77
4.066,493
1,965.665
1.593,787
2,449.602
4,202,915
5,343.594
6,341,227
27,209,778
-------
TABLE A-4A
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
ALABAMA
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-260000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
4
4
9
21
14
3
2
4
2
0
0
0
63
l* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
2
4
8
17
7
3
1
3
1
0
0
0
46
734,500
1,525
6,410
20,780
12,680
26,500
9,300
93,100
75,500
0
0
0
980,2<*5
TOTAL 0 OF POPULA- NO. OF
# OF COMMUNITIES TION CQMMUNI- POPULATION
PLANTS SERVFD TIES SERVED
6
3
11
27
25
21
22
4
4
6
0
0
1*9
2
3
9
IS
20
17
10
2
2
1
0
0
84
51.520
5,500
10,520
30,804
5", 90S
12^,500
129,793
38,000
198,102
262,500
0
0
911,147
0
1
3
12
13
5
1
2
0
1
0
0
38
0
250
1,850
19,370
35,798
31,100
12,000
35,300
0
155,000
0
0
290,668
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ALABAMA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
«NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGORY <=RATIO OF|
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
8
24
34
20
21
12
4
2
I
2
0
128
0
19
39
45
27
23
15
5
5
1
2
0
181
<-
0.5
0
0
4
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
10
1.0
0
4
5
3
3
3
2
0
1
1
0
0
22
1.2
0
0
3
2
5
0
I
1
0
0
1
0
13
1.4
0
2
5
8
2
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
22
1.6
0
0
4
4
3
7
4
0
2
0
0
0
24
1.8
0
3
4
4
2
2
2
0
1
" 0
0
0
18
2.0
0
4
7
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
17
2.5
0
0
1
8
4
3
1
1
. 1
0
0
0
19
3.0
0
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
9
3.5
0
2
2
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
7
4.0
0
0
?
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
•5
>4.0
0
2
0
7
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1966 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
ALABAMA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. Of
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<*500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
N3 10000-25000
rv>
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
11
27
38
20
22
12
4
2
1
2
0
139
0
24
43
51
27
25
15
5
5
1
2
0
198
<«
0.5
0
4
3
5
5
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
21
1.0
0
15
37
40
16
17
9
1
4
0
1
0
140
in
1.2
0
1
2
0
0
1
2
2
1
0
0
0
9
u. ur r
1.4
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
5
LB"H i 1
1.6
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
n 31 tc
i.a
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
V,H i TUMP
2.0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
T s-isni
2.5
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
I u J r i
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
0
3.5
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.3
0
2
0
1
3
2
D
3
3
3
3
0
8
-------
GO
ALABAMA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1963 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW SCO 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
130000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3530
3
*
2
I
0
1
6528
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4500
4
1
0
0
1
7500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
1
0
10000
1
c
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7500
6
*
2
0
0
2
76000
4
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
30760
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
2
0
2
0
450COO
7
0
0
4
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
389250
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
1
3
4
0
14
0
I
6
2
3
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
3528
460000
86500
55002ft
0
0
360
16180
12000
42000
30000
0
0
335000
0
435540
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
ALASKA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-50C
500-1000
1000-2 SCO
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25COO-50COO
50000-100000
1 00000-2 5000(3
25000Q-500000
>50COOO
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
C
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
* OF
COMMUNITIES
IDENTIFIABLE
C
C
0
C
C
0
1 10
0
0
C
0
0
1 10
POPULA-
TION
SERVED
0
0
0
0
0
0
,000
0
0
0
0
0
,000
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
# OF
COMMUNITIES
IDENTIFIABLE
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
POPULA-
TION
SERVED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NO. OF
COMMUNI-
TIES
0
6
4
5
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
20
POPULATION
SERVED
0
1,375
2,440
5.U05
5,200
12,800
0
24,000
0
0
0
0
51,620
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
ALASKA
C/1
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
100, 00 0-2 50, 000....
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 5
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 0
, I
>...... 0
TOTAL
158,092
41,950
6661 150
1 ,453.453
34.040
2,097, 894
550,116
2,789t 890
262,250
o
c
8,0 53, 835
INTERCEPTORS
0
o
o
214, 762
0
30,450
329,740
91, 708
0
0
666,660
NUMBER
1
1
1
0
o
0
o
I
o
o
o
4
NUMBER
0
0
o
o
3
o
o
o
6
NEW PLANTS
24,369
41 ,950
139«306
o
0
0
0
10,599
o
o
o
216,224
OUTFALL
0
o
152 «700
54,000
34 1 040
o
o
183 ,288
o
Q
o
424.028
NUMBER
1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
r*
0
1
NUMBER
0
o
o
I
o
o
o
1
o
o
o
2
LAGOONS
61,551
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
61 ,551
MISCELLANEOUS
0
o
329, 120
o
o
o
o
Q
o
347.046
NUMBER
1
n
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
NUMBER
2
0
1
2
o
I
1 Q
2
o
o
38
REPL.& ADOS
6,170
0
fl
36,506
o
o
0
0
42,676
SEWERS
66,0^2
o
374. 144
855,571
o
2 ,067,444
183,870
2 t 486,369
262 ,250
Q
o
6.295.650
-------
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ALASKA
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
0
3
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
f>
# OF POPUL4-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
0
3
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
335
760
0
2,100
0
10,000
0
0
0
0
0
13, 1<»5
TOTAL * OF
* OF COMMUNITIES
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
POPULA- NO. OF
TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVEO
0
0
0
0
0
400
0
0
0
0
0
0
400
0
6
3
5
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
18
0
1,375
1,680
5,805
3,100
12.800
0
24,000
0
0
0
0
48,760
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
ro
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ALASKA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRFLIMINflRY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
O500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
<-
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
*
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I n
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u. ur r
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
UM« i a i
1.6
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
c
1
n a i L. c
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
V*M I r\»U*
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T X = nH 1
2.5
0
0
0
0
c
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1 1.1 u r i
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 .
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
c
0
0
0
0
o
o
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
oo
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ALASKA
INDICATED L3ADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS*
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0.5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
i n
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u. ur r
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L«HI i a i
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n 01 ic
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IAI cuim
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I %«H»I
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
lu ur i
3.0
9
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
3
0
3
3
3
3
3
0
3
3
0
0
3
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/1?
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
ALASKA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
ro
CO
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 > 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
ARIZONA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
° 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
2 50000-5 COOOO
>50COOO
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
1
3
5
4
4,
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
1
3
1
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
245
800
2,529
13,000
18.700
0
0
0
0
0
0
35,274
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
2
4
5
14
10
8
5
1
0
1
2
0
52
» OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
2 4,000 0 0
3
5
12
6
7
5
1
0
1
1
0
43
595
4,215
18,395
24,220
63,200
57,100
25,000
0
164,700
288,000
0
649,425
0
0
2
1
0
1
0 .
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
2,600
3,350
0
20,000
0
0
0
0
0
25,950
-------
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CGNTRACT AWARDS
ARIZONA
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
50 . 000- 1 00 t 000..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
11
7
I
9
6
d
31
3
0
42
110
230
NUMBER
0
g
0
o
1
o
3
o
o
10
7
21
TOTAL
766t662
570*711
31,069
514, 584
It895, 225
1, 090 * 21 1
4, 348, 122
1,105,606
0
7,592, 322
30, 541 1 482
48,455, 994
INTERCEPTORS
0
o
c
o
311 ,742
o
354, 641
0
0
3,396,758
3,978,564
8,041,705
NUMBER
2
0
o
2
1
2
o
o
0
0
0
7
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
o
o
1
2
o
o
8
11
NEW PLANTS
116,590
o
o
115.427
1,212,377
527,600
0
o
0
0
0
1,971 ,994
OUTFALL
0
0
0
o
o
o
61 .054
814,186
o
0
8,446,508
9.321,748
NUMBER
1
o
1
1
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
3
NUMBER
0
I
0
•0
1
o
2
0
o
o
o
4
LAGOONS
32.560
o
31 ,069
60,446
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
124,075
MISCELLANEOUS
0
30,256
0
0
286,308
o
2.368,242
0
o
o
o
2,684,806
NUMBER
1
1
o
3
1
0
4
0
0
1
1
12
NUMBER
7
5
0
2
2
4
21
6
0
31
94
172
REPL.t ADDS
7,763
10,430
134.783
58,785
o
415.626
0
0
2,382.611
5*306,361
8,316,359
SEWERS
609.749
530,025
0
203.928
26,013
562.611
1 ,148.559
291,420
0
1,812,953
12,810,049
17,995.307
-------
TABLE A-4A
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
ARIZONA
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-SOOOO
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
# OF POPULA-
C01HUNITIES TinN
SERVED
0
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
ROO
350
7,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8,650
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
2
5
5
18
13
12
5
1
0
1
2
0
64
« (IF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
2
4
5
15
9
10
5
1
0
1
1
0
53
4,000
840
4,215
21,895
33,770
81,900
57,100
25,000
0
164,700
288,000
0
681,420
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1,200
0
0
20,000
0
0
0
0
0
21,200
-------
0
1
Ol
to
t
CD
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
COMM. NO. OF <»
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
CJ 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
8
4
5
10
8
6
2
0
0
1
0
44
0
10
6
7
11
8
6
2
0
0
1
0
51
0.5
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1.0
0
3
1
3
2
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
15
TABLE A-SA
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
A R I I n N A
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGORY 4.0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN OATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ARIZONA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF <»
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
O500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
CO
•*" 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
14
6
12
13
8
6
2
0
1
1
0
63
0
16
9
14
14
8
6
2
0
1
1
0
71
0.5
0
8
3
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
17
1.0
0
6
5
13
12
6
4
1
0
1
0
0
48
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
u> ur r
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
LMm O 1
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n 3 i ic
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I.MI cuun
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T %»nj«|
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
3
0
3
0
0
lu ur i
3,0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.3
3
2
0
3
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
2
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRFLIMINARY
A R I Z 0 N A
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING CONN./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
1
0
0
1
455
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
375
2
*
1
0
0
1
1200
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
700
3
*
2
0
0
2
4000
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1000
4
*
3
0
0
3
34700
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2700
5
*
I
0
0
1
11600
0
0
C
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
*
1
0
0
1
28000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
1
0
0
1
164700
2
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
17000
9
*
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
e
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
n
0
10
n
7
1
1
3
1
I
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
244655
244655
0
375
700
37CO
5COO
12000
0
0
0
p
0
21775
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ARKANSAS
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
CO
OT 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500040
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
2
11
31
12
11
4
2
0
0
0
0
73
» OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
2
11
30
10
9
I
1
0
0
0
0
bit
0
450
6.880
43,010
25.625
60.600
11,300
25,290
0
0
0
0
173,155
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
2
14
14
13
10
8
2
0
1
0
0
64
« OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
2
14
14
13
8
7
1
0
1
0
0
60
0
1.750
10,085
22,385
65,150
53,100
162,550
35,300
0
95,000
0
0
445,320
0
0
2
9
5
2
3
1
2
0
0
0
24
0
0
1,100
11,900
13,100
8,500
31,200
39,000
69,400
0
0
0
174,200
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
ARKANSAS
U)
' POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SUE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
TOTAL
NUMBER
4
12
47
58
38
53
29
10
26
23
o
300
NUMBER
1
2
9
14
4
14
5
2
6
4
o
61
TOTAL
409 , 1 1 1
710.197
3, 105,215
4,086, 846
3,228,024
10,085,967
7,891,919
2,448,235
12, 597, 938
5,809, 571
o
50,373,023
INTERCEPTORS
294,872
147,409
681,063
887, 880
515,060
2,718,058
1,741,942
779,005
6,737,219
5,259,972
0
19,762,480
NUMBER
0
0
2
4
o
4
2
0
6
0
19
NUMBER
0
o
1
o
3
3
o
o
0
0
8
NEW PLANTS
0
0
314,938
534,334
0
1,760,342
2,904,816
0
5,025,190
14,000
0
10,553,620
OUTFALL
0
0
78,649
0
180,488
246,076
17,235
o
0
0
0
522,448
NUMBER
0
2
15
14
9
5
2
1
0
0
o
48
NUMBER
1
4
13
13
e
12
6
I
1
1
0
60
LAGOONS
0
47,627
491,832
574,572
524.187
583,913
74,825
475,000
0
0
0
2,771,956
MISCELLANEOUS
70,851
330,711
1,028,209
1,105,928
931,149
2,756,837
1,271,853
409,800
423,083
20,000
0
8,348.421
NUMBER
0
1
0
1
2
1
2
0
0
o
0
7
NUMBER
2
3
7
12
12
14
11
6
13
17
' 0
97
REPL.G ADOS
0
6,000
0
110,601
252,447
233,108
387,017
C
0
0
0
989,173
SEWERS
43,388
178,450
510,524
873,531
824,693
1 ,787,633
1,494.231
784,430
412,446
515,599
0
7,424,925
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
ARKANSAS
SECONDARY
N 0
PUFLIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-9000
co
CD 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
2*>0000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
1
0
?
9
4
4
0
0
3
0
' 0
0
23
* OF POPULA-
COWUNITIES TION
SFRVFO
1
0
3
7
4
3
0
0
2
0
0
0
20
90,250
0
2,400
11,350
9,750
19,500
0
0
74,400
0
0
0
207,650
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
13
47
47
29
17
15
S
2
0
0
0
179
# OF POPULA- NO. DF
COMMUNITIES TICN COMMUNI- POPULATION
SEPVEO TIES SERVED
0
12
<-5
46
23
15
10
3
0
0
0
0
154
0
5,555
32,5^0
60,410
83,025
112,725
152,50-5
69,700
14,945
0
0
0
540,495
0
0
1
1
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
3
42,975
0
600
1,000
0
0
33,255
38,089
0
0
0
0
115,919
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ARKANSAS
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
4
8
18
10
5
5
0
0
0
0
0
50
0
4
8
18
10
6
5
0
0
0
0
0
51
0.5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0
0
0
0
4
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
9
i n
1.2
0
0
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
u. ur r
0
0
I
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
U « IH 1 3 1
1.6
0
0
0
4
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
7
nt 31 LC
1.8
0
1
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
UH 1 CUUK
2.0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
^
T V«K«I
2.5
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
C
0
0
- 0
0
3
tu ur i
3.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.0
0
3
2
0
2
0
1
0
c
0
0
0
8
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ARKANSAS
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
5
9
21
16
10
9
3
1
0
0
0
74
0
5
10
21
16
12
9
3
1
0
0
0
77
0.5
0
0
1
2
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
8
1.0
0
1
0
5
3
4
5
2
0
0
0
0
20
i n
1.2
0
0
1
4
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
10
u. ur r
0
0
1
2
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
t»^ i a i
1.6
0
0
0
5
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
n 311.^
1.8
0
1
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
I»H I cv?un
2.0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
I %"!%«!
2.5
0
0
1
3
2
2
1
0
0
3
0
0
6
1 u ur i
3.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
1
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
>4,3
3
3
4
3
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
3
7
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
ARKANSAS
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
CDM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVEO
SERVING COHM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COHM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
c
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
c
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
66000
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
c
0
0
c
c
0
c
0
0
ri
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
rt
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
c
0
*
0
n
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
1
0
n
V-
0
c
1
0
c
r
r
r
c
c
0
n
f<
f\
0
0
c
0
r
66COO
p
0
n
0
c
66000
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 66/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
CALIFORNIA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
11
14
13
19
5
8
13
9
3
3
0
8
106
* OF POPULA-
COHMUNIT1ES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
11
10
13
14
5
8
12
5
3
2
0
3
86
799,275
4(220
17,910
94,034
15,125
43,900
343,750
511,740
228,500
331,800
0
6,093,795
8,484,049
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
36
24
26
83
67
49
54
16
12
6
0
4
377
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
31
20
24
73
63
39
39
10
9
1
0
1
310
295,210
7,855
22,985
218,212
228.141
343,180
672,935
756,725
624,050
144,125
0
257,500
3,570,918
4
4
2
4
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
18
4,050
1,100
750
10,100
9,985
8,000
28,500
0
0
450
0
0
62,935
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
CALIFORNIA
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
120
95
62
102
161
220
388
256
312
279
It254
3.249
NUMBER
1
6
6
4
8
12
16
g
25
1
35
122
TOTAL
4(341.457
12(673(098
8t 395*333
13(511t363
21, 134t626
33(859(369
55(355(067
39(858(417
28, 579t 141
24(513(053
156,702, 117
398«923(041
INTERCEPTORS
487(018
1,074, 267
517(009
655(575
1(341(155
3(271(646
4(563(031
2,862, 577
7,336(596
37, 740
22(384(973
44.531,587
NUMBER
13
7
6
8
10
4
13
6
6
1
16
90
NUMBER
4
I
5
10
12
e
10
1C
5
9
42
116
NEW PLANTS
460(596
1,756,581
593(195
1(491 (407
2(811(904
1 (626(237
6(897*824
10(884(343
1(876(946
98(969
6(678(928
35(176(930
OUTFALL
366(938
1(118(000
691(162
834(672
2(442(810
1(254(406
2(471 (5C9
4(878(904
1 (646.776
886(790
14(460(084
31.052(051
NUMBER
2
3
2
3
2
1
3
1
4
1
3
25
NUMBER
7
6
4
3
6
8
12
8
7
4
24
89
LAGOONS
241,764
332,840
217(441
305,663
247,901
101,748
1(256,044
115.441
1(725(133
172(865
134(122
4(850.962
MISCELLANEOUS
260(029
1(050.948
996(002
667(216
844(174
1(195,139
3(117(762
1,554, 546
916,765
226,911
28,741(761
39,571,253
NUMBER
25
9
12
17
20
24
31
13
16
8
30
205
NUMBER
68
63
27
57
103
163
303
210
249
255
1(104
2(602
RFPL.C ADDS
768.864
1 .900,969
1 (083.591
4.218.090
1.540(192
8. 92 5. 604
15,428.904
6,943.308
3,698.562
1 ,546.128
11.885(043
57,939,255
SEWERS
1.756,248
5.439,493
4(2°6,931»
5(338(740
11 (906(490
17(484,589
21(619,991
12(619.298
11 .378,363
21(543(650
72(417(206
185(801,003
-------
I960 CENSUS
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
CALIFORNIA
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
n
14
11
14
4
Q
15
6
5
2
0
7
100
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
8
11
11
11
3
• 7
14
4
5
1
0
2
77
1,400,395
76,505
8,805
26,740
52,000
84,600
377,160
191,000
401,690
265,000
0
8,197,000
11,080,885
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
42
47
51
82
75
48
56
18
12
6
0
9
446
# OF POPULA- NO. f)F
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNl- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
24
30
47
75
70
43
36
12
8
2
0
1
348
922,305
228,790
82.465
246,540
344,695
492, ?70
888,995
654,480
775,400
861,900
0
27,040
5,524,880
0
2
0
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
7
2,100
350
0
8,990
5,500
0
5,000
0
0
0
0
0
21,940
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
cn
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
CALIFORNIA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
> 5 000 00
TOTALS
0
27
25
64
69
50
68
37
21
a
2
5
376
0
46
32
71
71
58
80
39
24
9
3
6
439
<»
0.5
0
0
2
3
3
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
13
1.0
0
4
1
10
8
9
11
6
3
1
0
1
54
I r
1.2
0
0
2
5
5
8
4
4
5
0
0
2
35
YU. ur t
1.4
0
3
1
4
7
6
9
4
3
2
1
1
41
•mm i 3 i
1.6
0
2
2
5
1
2
6
3
3
1
0
0
25
ir» ii tn
1.8
0
3
3
5
e
6
5
7
4
2
0
0
43
i, A i cuur
2.0
0
3
1
2
4
4
8
5
2
0
0
0
29
IT V=RAI
2.5
0
4
1
12
9
6
11
6
2
1
0
2
54
i lu ur i
3.0
0
2
6
2
3
2
8
2
1
0
0
0
26
3.5
0
2
1
3
5
6
3
0
0
0
1
0
21
4.0
0
?
1
3
3
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
11
>4.0
0
21
11
17
15
7
11
2
1
1
1
0
87
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
cn
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
C A L I F 0 R N I A
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING ffATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
O500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
34
29
73
75
53
68
37
21
8
2
5
405
0
53
36
80
77
61
80
39
24
9
3
6
468
0.5
0
8
9
11
10
6
5
I
3
0
0
0
53
1.0
0
18
12
36
29
32
38
22
11
6
0
3
207
1 1'
1.2
0
2
4
3
14
8
18
6
7
2
1
2
67
turn ur
1.4
0
7
3
5
6
5
9
2
2
1
0
I
41
ru **i i d i
1.6
0
3
2
7
4
4
3
4
1
0
1
0
29
PI 3 1 £C
1.8
0
1
1
3
3
4
3
2
0
0
0
0
17
\*« I cvur
2.0
0
2
0
7
3
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
15
iT N~F%HI
2.5
0
1
1
3
2
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
12
i v \ir i
3.0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3.5
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
>4.0
0
11
2
4
2
3
3
3
0
3
3
3
19
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
CALIFORNIA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
I
*
1
1
0
0
200
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
2
0
0
2
1600
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
17600
3
*
15
0
6
9
61025
21
4
7
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
33000
4
*
8
0
2
6
54945
11
1
2
5
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
42085
5
*
16
0
8
8
412510
27
3
4
15
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
129990
6
*
13
0
3
10
521900
25
I
2
6
8
4
4
0
0
0
0
220190
7
*
9
0
5
4
558150
15
0
2
4
4
3
1
1
0
0
0
144245
8
*
9
0
8
1
6833915
90
1
0
14
9
21
23
14
6
2
0
346799C
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
73
1
32
40
0
191
10
18
52
25
34
29
15
6
2
0
0
0
200
7300135
1143910
8444245
0
2880
15895
163455
151405
475300
888215
993795
652485
711670
0
4055100
-------
TABLE A-8A
CALIFORNIA.
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS .SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
•^. BOO
600-1000
1000-2600
2600-5000
6000-10000
10000-25000
26000rBQOOp
60066-Tboooo
100000-260000
260000-600000
>66506o
Total
INDICATip
COMPLETION DATE
1966
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oTlater
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
1
1
2
1
1
2
Prim, to Sec
..; V
. Primary
u
1;
8
1
7
8
Socondsry
6
1
2
U
5
3
h
'.
2$
1
18
25
INTERCEPTORS
6
2
1
2
$
1
1
18
$
13
18
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
i
i
2
i
2
2
Outfall
.i
i
i
i
8
2
6
8
Ifitorcfiption
h
2
2
1 •
6
i
2
18
k
Ik
18
Plant
1
•1
1
3
3
3
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos- Reduction
Dther
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
18
2
2
U
6
Ih
h
h
1
&
TOTAL MtOJICTI
1CHEDULEO
20
6U
81;
00
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
COLORADO
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50COO
50000-100000
100000-250000
25000 0-50COCO
>500COC
TOTALS
TOTAL
f» OF
PLANTS
1
9
6
12
4
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
34
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
1
9
6
12
4
1
0
0
0
c
0
c
33
l.OCO
2,470
4,340
21,595
14,800
8,000
0
0
0
0
550,000
0
602,205
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
11
18
24
22
9
11
11
5
3
0
1
0
115
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIHABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
11
16
24
21
9
1C
10
4
2
0
1
0
108
46,700
5,083
17,673
32,930
34,770
82,270
146,080
178,025
222,000
0
30,000
0
795,531
1
5
16
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
l.OOC
1,390
8,815
3,525
3,640
5,000
0
0
0
0
c
c
23,370
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BV POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
COLORADO
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
50.000-100,000
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
tn
° UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
2 5 .000—50 1 000. ...........
NUMBER
7
9k
I •»
?1
9
12
23
49
17
15
33
223
NUMBER
0
I
I
2
o
2
2
2
1
1
5
17
TOTAL
723,692
t HVf t li?
2.4AC jL4tf%
1. 9TA. iAQ
2- ARC A ftQ^k
3. »AO AAO
1 .^S^.ftSi.
?>5. Al 7* fion
47,933,299
INTERCEPTORS
0
21,990
3,000
81 t 176
0
865,660
122*776
244,470
301, 631
521, 506
2,896, 510
5.058,719
NUMBER
1
8
25
NUMBER
1
1
0
I
o
0
3
3
4
1
1
15
NEW PLANTS
116.000
676,841
77tl77
776,902
248.628
3 t4TZ»514
23,437,746
OUTFALL
63.140
70.615
0
19.267
o
0
148.538
716.624
306,476
17.150
69.074
1.410.884
"NUMBER "
0
3
3
4
1
13
NUMBER
0
3
2
3
o
1
1
7
4
I
3
25
LAGOONS
0
82,580
152.489
284.410
155.541
0
1,147,833
MISCELLANEOUS
0
55, 863
109,640
262, 585
o
28, 554
2 ,890
2,032,755
1 ,123,442
362,854
1,908.603
5.887.186
"NUMBER
3
1
1
2
1
22
NUMBER
2
4
5
7
1 ?
33
2
10
19
106
"RE PL. I" ADDS
328.046
25.950
20,265
311,161
28,245
2TOt9Z5
34tH90
tHPOf 63Z
3.048,274
SEWERS
216,506
4JL.? 9flO
1 1ft. B«5fl
T1 O. 1 9O
9Oft. t 1 "*
5*. A . 94 1
? . S37. 54.5
185*996
363*754
1*362*271
7.942*657
-------
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
COLORADO
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
9
3
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITtES TIOM
SERVED
0
9
3
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
2,775
2,1*5
2,520
10,300
8,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
25,740
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
20
45
37
39
11
11
8
6
3
0
0
0
180
«r OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
19
42
35
37
10
11
7
4
2
0
0
0
167
806,865
38,933
29,048
76,050
42,445
98,765
124,200
230,000
262,000
0
0
0
1 ,708,306
1
5
<3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
100
3,135
6,0(SO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,295
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRFLIMINARV
01
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
COLORADO
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMH. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
3
2
5
6
6
a
0
2
2
0
0
34
0
3
2
5
6
6
8
0
2
2
0
0
34
0.5
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
. 0
0
0
0
3
1.0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
6
INI
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
a. of p1
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
LANT5 II
1.6
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
M bl it
1.8
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
UAI tl»UK
2.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
T «.= Kftl
2.5
0
0
0
1
1
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
6
lu uri
3.0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
4
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.0 >4.0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
c
0
0
5
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
COLORADO
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
—————— ------ \ iiu« ur i-L«nii in ^itc unieuuKT N.»NHI lu jri
COMH. NO. OF <«
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
CJ1 10000-25000
OJ
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
8
7
13
11
10
12
1
3
2
0
0
67
0
a
8
13
12
10
12
1
3
2
0
0
69
0.5
0
1
1
2
2
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
11
1.0
0
5
2
5
5
4
5
0
1
1
0
0
26
1.2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
3
1.4
0
0
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1.6
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
i.a
0
0
i
0
i
i
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
2.0
0
0
0
1
0
1
I
0
0
0
0
0
3
2.5
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3.0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
>4.3
0
2
1
1
1
1
3
3
3
3
3
0
6
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
TABLE A-7A
COLORADO
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
1
0
0
1
1400
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
825
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
2
0
0
2
26BOO
5
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
20525
6
*
1
0
0
1
42000
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
200
7
*
1
0
0
1
120000
3
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
16625
8
*
1
0
I
0
550000
11
0
6
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
25915
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ft
0
0
0
6
0
1
5
0
23
4
8
7
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
550000
190200
740200
0
1025
5600
20140
8000
29325
0
0
0
0
e
64090
-------
TABLE A-8A
COLORADO
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
Unknown
<.60°_
600-1000
1000-7600
2600-6000
EOOO-10000
10000-26000
26000-60000
60000-lOObOO
100000-260000
260000-600000
>506000
Total
_ INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oMater
Date riot given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
$
1
6
J>
1
2
6
Secondary
3
2
t
1
1
3
$
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec,
1
1
2
1
1
2
Primary
u
1
1
1
7
1
1
$
1
Secondary
$
$
$
6
3
2
2
3
31
6
11
5
1
S
31
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
•
Other
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
13
10
10
7
1
3
2
2
2
*o
•MAI taoJIMI
SCHEDULED
12
13
7
1
Ib
i>l
-------
TABLE A-2A
01
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
CONNECTICUT
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMfcNT
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1COO-25CO
2500-5000
5000-1000C
10000-25000
25GOO-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
in OF
PLANTS
0
0
1
1
2
4
8
15
11
7
0
0
49
* OF
PUPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
0
1
1
2
4
8
9
4
4
0
C
33
0
0
1 , 500
1,300
920
21,742
51,480
250,557
234,175
642,819
0
0
1,204(493
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
I
0
1
2
a
9
7
10
1
0
0
0
31
* OF
COMMUNITIES
IDENTIFIABLE
1
0
1
2
0
6
6
5
1
0
0
0
22
POPULA-
TION
SERVED
140
0
800
1,700
0
29,783
49,500
99,400
45,000
0
0
0
226.323
NO. OF
COMMUNI-
TIES
0
0
1
1
4
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
11
POPULATION
SERVED
0
0
2,000
400
13,640
0
44,600
0
0
0
0
0
60,840
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—196Z - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
CONNECTICUT
01
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
50.000-100,000...
NUMBER
16
2
3
15
27
42
150
149
125
71
2
602
NUMBER
0
1
0
2
8
3
8
8
4
1
0
35
TOTAL
1,726,066
275,744
377,156
3,206,397
7,915,997
15*704, 809
31,811, 158
24,143,446
28,459,807
14,646,694
141,241
128,410,515
INTERCEPTORS
0
49, 139
0
618,293
2,202,010
1, 572, 876
3,437, 933
3,876, 777
4,948,479
675, 150
0
17,380,657
NUMBER
4
o
1
3
1
3
8
4
2
0
0
26
NUMBER
1
0
o
0
0
o
1
2
o
o
o
4
NEW PLANTS
596.943
c
73 ,000
965,039
375,822
7, 122,148
6,358,097
4(837,985
3,060.000
0
0
23,439,034
OUTFALL
34,800
0
0
0
0
0
384,370
456,555
0
0
0
875t725
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
o
o
o
NUMBER
0
0
o
0
3
1
it
7
6
1
0
22
LAGOONS
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
o
MISCELLANEOUS
0
0
0
o
427,484
32,500
259.334
976,086
1.23?, 350
1 ,433.000
0
4,360,754
NUMBER
1
o
1
o
1
5
11
5
4
4
0
32
NUMBER
10
1
1
10
14
30
118
123
109
65
2
483
REPL.C ADDS
651,200
32,347
0
20,700
1,564.854
2,222,548
948,388
2,950,237
4.415,453
0
12,805,727
SEWERS
445.123
226,605
271,809
1 ,623.065
4,889.981
5.412,431
19,148.876
12,997,655
16.268.741
8,123.091
141,241
69.548,618
-------
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4A
106ft MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
CONNECTICUT
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5COO-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
2
7
14
14
3
7
0
0
47
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNIT16S T10N
SERVED
0
0
0
0
2
6
13
8
3
4
0
0
36
0
0
0
0
1,040
32,930
120,f>l5
242,760
207,000
572,800
0
0
1,177,145
TOTAL # OF POPULA- NO. OF
It OF COMMUNITIES TlflN COMMUNI- POPULATION
PLANTS SERVED TIES SERVED
0
0
0
2
2
7
8
11
3
0
0
0
33
0
0
0
2
2
6
7
6
2
0
0
0
25
0
0
0
1,550
2,660
20,230
82,550
157,200
77,700
0
0
0
341,890
0
0
1
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
2.000
150
2,140
7,000
18,830
0
0
0
0
0
30,120
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
CONNECTICUT
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COHM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
£g 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
3
5
6
9
12
12
11
4
2
0
0
64
0
4
7
6
13
13
15
12
6
2
0
0
78
<-
0.5
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1.0
0
2
1
0
5
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
11
IN
1.2
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
7
u. ur K
1.4
0
0
I
2
3
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
8
LA>NI3 1
1.6
0
0
3
0
0
4
1
0
0
1
0
0
9
H Jlit
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
4
(,A ltl>UI
2.0
0
0
0
1
0
3
1
2
2
0
0
0
9
4.0
0
c
0
I
1
2
0
0
c
0
0
0
4
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
CONNECTICUT
INDICATED LOAOINS / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
—————— —————— i nu. ur ri_ «T i i in iitc v«nieuUKT VKAIIU jri
COMM. NO. OF <"
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
O300
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
<7, 5000-10000
O
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
3
5
6
9
12
13
11
4
2
0
0
65
0
4
7
e
13
13
16
12
6
2
0
0
81
0.5
0
1
2
1
2
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.0
0
2
2
5
7
3
8
2
0
0
0
0
29
1.2
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
3
0
0
0
0
7
1.4
0
1
1
1
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
e
1.6
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
1
2
1
0
0
8
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
0
0
5
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.5
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
6
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.3
3
0
0
0
1
2
0
3
3
0
3
3
3
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
en
C ON N E C T I C U T
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
C
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
*
1
0
1
0
31400
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
2
0
2
0
147500
I
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3000
a
*
2
0
2
0
279119
8
0
0
0
2
4
1
1
0
0
0
143395
9
*
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
*
0
0
0
n
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
5
0
5
0
0
9
0
C
0
2
5
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
458019
0
458019
r>
0
r<
0
16100
48295
28000
54000
0
0
0
146395
-------
TABLE A-8A
CONNECTICUT
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
<.5fio_
500-1000
1000-2600
2600-6000
EOpp-IOpOp
10000-26000.
26000-60000
eoooo-Tooboo
100000-260000
250000-6GOOOO
>»600050
Totil
LNDICAtlD
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
l97l
1972
1973 or later
Date not given
Total Projects
NEV
Primary
1 PLANT
Secondary
27
1
2
2
32
1
9
19
2
1
32
EXPANSION/UPGHADWG/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
1
2
7
3
1
2
16
li
9
2
1
16
Primary
Secondary
1
1
1
1
u
1
9
5
3
1
9
INTERCEPTORS
5
1
1
7
1
1
2
3
7
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
28
1
1
2
*
13
U
1
2
57
1
17
31
6
2
57
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phot. Reduction
Other
1
1
1
1
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
32
1
1
2
6
13
5
1
2
63
•CHCDULID
PEN VIA!
3
36
6U
15
U
122
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PR I M A R Y
TABLE A-2A
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
DELAWARE
SECONDARY
PRELIMINARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<»500
5 00-1 00 C
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100.000-250000
250000-500000
>500/)00
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
0
0
5
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
# OF PQPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
1
0
0
5
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
225,000
0
0
10,152
10,825
13,045
0
0
0
0
0
0
259,022
TOTAL « OF
# OF COMMUNITIES
PLANTS IDENTIFIABLE
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
POPULA- NO. OF
TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
0
0
0
3,956
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,956
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
863
700
2>700
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,263
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
DELAWARE
POPULATION SUE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
25,000-50tOOO...
I00t000-250t000
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
TOTAL
NUMBER
3
3
3
12
12
7
8
0
8
0
26
82
NUMBER
0
0
1
4
2
2
0
0
2
0
4
15
TOTAL
34,064
231,260
493,295
2,473,683
833,376
1,700,105
123,227
0
4,955,654
0
3,143,135
13,987,799
INTERCEPTORS
0
0
33,592
761,657
246,730
130.722
0
0
412,660
0
1.752,918
3,338,279
NUMBER
1
0
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
NUMBER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
4
NEW PLANTS
3,975
0
178.500 .
1.146,212
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,328,687
OUTFALL
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
255,737
255,737
NUMBER
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
NUMBER
0
2
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
6
LAGOONS
0
0
0
0
175.300
0
0
0
0
0
0
175,300
MISCELLANEOUS
0
127,803
0
0
143,106
65,419
14,577
0
0
0
0
350.905
NUMBER REPL.6 ADDS
0
0
0
0
1
3 1
0
0
2 3
0
0
6 5
NUMBER
2
1
1
3
6
1
7
0
4
0
18 1
43 3
0
0
0
0
49,590
.400*264
0
0
,891,700
0
0
.341,554
SEWERS
30,089
103,457
281,203
565,814
218.650
103,700
108.650
0
651,294
0
,134,480
,197.337
-------
TABLE A-4A
en
1960 CENSUS
196« MUNICIPAL WASTE INVFNTO^Y
DELAWARE
PRIMARY SfCONDAPY
N n
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
5.0000-100000
1 00000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# PF
PLANTS
1
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
# OF POPULA-
CC1MUNITIES TIOM
SFRVF3
1
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
225,000
0
0
4,370
11,070
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
240,440
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
i
i
7
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
13
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TICN COMMUNI- POPULATION
SF.PVFD TIPS SERVFO
0
0
1
7
1
?
0
0
1
0
0
0
12
0
455
1,005
12,860
2,405
20,515
0
0
334,000
0
0
0
371,330
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
500000
TOTALS
0
1
0
9
4
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
18
0
1
0
9
4
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
18
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IN
1.2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0. OF P
1.4
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
LANTS I
1.6
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
N SIZE
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
CATEGOR
2.0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
V <*RAT
2.5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
in OFI
3.0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1966 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
DELAWARE
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATI3
PRELIMINARY
COMN. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOMN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
1
0
10
«
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
19
0
1
0
10
*
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
19
0.5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
i n
1.2
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
u. ur K
1.4
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
LAN IS 1
1.6
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
•* ai te
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
C« lEbUK
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T ^«KAI
2.5
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
2
tu ui-i
3.0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4*0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.3
0
3
3
1
3
3
3
0
9
3
3
3
1
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
cn
CO
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
BELOW 500
DELAWARE
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1
-------
TABLE A-8A
DELAWARE
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
TABLE A-2A
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
PRIMARY SECONDARY
PRELIMINARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
SOOO-10COO
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-260000
25000 0-50COOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
» OF
COMMUNITIES
IDENTIFIABLE
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
POPULA-
TION
SERVED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
1
1
* OF
COMMUNITIES
IDENTIFIABLE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
POPULA-
TION
SERVED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 1,323,470
1 It
323,470
NO. OF
COMMUNI-
TIES
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
POPULATION
SERVtD
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 2
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 1
TOTAL
556,483
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
53, 599,294
54,155,777
INTERCEPTORS
404,625
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
25,519,908
25,924.533
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
NUMBER
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
3
3
NEW PLANTS
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
OUTFALL
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
4t256 ,990
4,256.990
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
g
8
LAGOONS
0
Q
o
o
o
n
MISCELLANEOUS
0
Q
o
o
o
1O .*71 . 938
10 .471.238
NUMBER
0
0
5
NUMBER
1
0
g
0
98
99
REPL.G ADOS
0
4.P9Q.&&7
&.f)?Q. &A7
SFWERS
151,858
r\
o
9, 321,691
9,473,549
-------
TABLE A-4A
1560 CENSUS
1500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL # PF POPULA- NO. OF
# OF COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
PLANTS SERVED TIES SERVFD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 ,750,000
1,750,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
CO
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<*500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
<=
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 ™
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U. UP I"
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LAH 1 9 1
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
n 31 LC
l.B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
VH 1 CUUK
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T *. = *« 1
2.5
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
i u ur v
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
c
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 6.9/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO
. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
<»
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
in
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u. ur r
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
kini a i
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n 31 if
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
UHI cwim
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T s«nm
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1U I'D
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.3
0
0
9
3
0
3
0
0
3
3
3
0
3
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-o
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
1
0
0
1
1323470
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1323470
1323470
0
0
p
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 66/12/17
IS)60 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
FLORIDA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-1COOO
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-50COGG
>50COOO
TOTALS
TOTAL
* Of
PLANTS
1
11
12
10
16
9
10
5
2
6
1
0
83
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
1
2
9
1C
12
8
9
2
1
2
1
0
57
13,000
2.635
5,810
10,225
47,965
32,750
94,470
70,160
50,000
358,900
190,000
0
875,915
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
3
41
26
44
41
34
27
15
3
3
5
0
242
» OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
3 13,740
a
10
16
17
22
11
9
3
0
1
0
100
10,565
16,096
61,765
120,490
166,738
141,320
254,450
164,000
16,900
196,770
0
1,162,834
0
0
2
5
2
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
16
0
485
700
5,050
7,030
7,000
39,500
40,000
32,000
0
0
0
131,765
-------
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
FLORIDA
POPULATION SUE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 67
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 1
i
TOTAL
3,328,469
672,068
1 ,3*8,308
7,489, 636
12,734,692
28,027,953
23,174,726
18,568, 519
11,980,479
9,968, 739
31,870,092
149, 163*661
INTERCEPTORS
72,885
o
0
7, 783
552, 392
1,002.120
139,067
1,315, 730
o
0
2,543, 202
5,633. 179
NUMBER
16
2
5
12
11
11
10
6
7
3
5
88
NUMBER
1
1
0
o
2
3
3
3
6
3
4
26
NEW PLANTS
468.946
373.300
339.195
2,050.326
2.959.003
3,422 .517
3,287.389
2 .469,453
421 .498
120 .376
1 .092 ,842
17,024.845
OUTFALL
17,894
116 ,240
o
o
905,013
1 .163 ,057
1 ,710 ,416
3,483 ,161
665,269
781 ,626
67,020
8,909.696
NUMBER
0
0
o
o
I
o
o
o
o
o
o
1
NUMBER
12
1
1
10
9
15
g
13
12
(,
16
103
LAGOONS
0
o
o
o
96.900
o
o
Q
o
n
0
96,900
MISCELLANEOUS
471,306
19,285
78, 123
1 .263.942
1 .281 .949
1 .929.931
2. &15 . 4ft ft
1 ,697, 485
397,387
on 7. 700
1 .826, 672
12.409.358
NUMBER
9
Q
2
1
&
15
12
13
7
5
18
88
NUMBER
28
•a
5
24
45
82
ft 1
62
74
4?
97
543
REPL.E ADDS
753,436
1 «,G . O7A.
8. Ann
TC& . A f.Si
2,903, 835
2 .489.683
2 ,444 , 376
3 .51 3 .377
3.481 , 90°
1 ,819, 612
1 8,430, 669
SEWERS
1,524,002
1 1^ ?^-a
Tf. 1 .ni 4
4.1 54. SRI
6. 1 fl? . Q7P
l 7 . SI A. &Q"*
t ? 91 ? A R^
7-lCO.Tlli
6,982 ,948
A 777 n^fl
24.520.744
86.659.034
-------
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
FLORIDA
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
0500
— J
03 500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-?5000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOT At
» OF
PLANTS
10
2
8
7
9
*
a
5
2
5
1
0
66
# PF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
0
1
5
6
6
7
7
2
0
2
1
0
37
8t795
705
4,100
7,655
29,440
157,450
77,750
110,100
32,800
201,400
190,000
0
820,195
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
54
11
33
37
58
60
54
35
48
12
26
0
428
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TIPN COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
10
8
1°
20
33
30
17
10
5
0
1
0
16?
67,539
6.005
32,117
73,495
169,045
213.295
324,545
382,255
327,715
11?. 590
210.360
0
1.918,961
0
0
2
2
4
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
0
0
700
2,000
10,180
9,500
11,000
40,000
32,000
0
4,600
0
109,980
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
196S MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
FLORIDA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGORY C-RATIO OF)
PRELIMINARY
COWM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
27
28
45
28
40
31
7
7
3
0
0
216
0
145
77
107
47
51
39
10
9
3
0
0
488
<«
0.5
0
0
0
5
0
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
10
1.0
0
16
16
17
12
9
4
3
3
0
0
0
80
1.2
0
16
10
7
7
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
48
1.4
0
7
4
10
7
4
5
3
0
0
0
0
40
1.6
0
7
5
7
3
9
4
0
2
0
0
0
37
1.8
0
3
0
5
3
2
7
1
2
0
0
0
23
2.0
0
7
4
9
2
4
3
1
0
1
0
0
31
2.5
0
12
11
20
4
P
4
1
2
0
0
0
62
3.0
0
9
5
4
4
4
3
1
0
1
0
0
31
3.5
0
A
10
7
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
30
4.0
0
7
3
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
16
>4.0
0
53
9
11
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
80
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
F L 0 R I 0 A
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
oo
O 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
31
29
48
28
40
33
8
7
3
0
0
227
0
150
78
111
47
52
42
11
9
3
0
0
503
<-
0.5
0
30
16
22
9
3
8
2
0
1
0
0
91
1.0
0
37
26
32
21
22
13
1
4
0
0
0
156
(NO. OP 1
1.2 1.4
0
12
6
9
8
7
7
1
2
0
0
0
52
0
7
3
3
1
6
4
0
1
1
0
0
26
'LANT5 IN SIZt
1.6 1.8
0
6
4
4
1 .
2
3
0
1
I
0
0
22
0
3
3
3
I
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
14
CATEGOI
2.0
0
7
2
3
1
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
19
»Y <«RA1
2.5
0
5
7
9
0
2
4
1
1
0
0
0
29
no aft
3.0
0
5
2
5
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
3.5
0
6
2
3
1
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
17
4.0
0
2
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
>4.0
0
30
6
n
2
1
1
3
0
3 .
3
9
57
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
CD
TABLE A-7A
FLORIDA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
PRELIMINARY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
1
0
1
0
15000
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3100
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
1
1
0
0
32COO
3
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9735
8
*
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
<>
*
0
0
0
0
r>
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
5
1
1
3
c
0
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
32000
15000
n
47000
0
1300
1600
9935
fi
0
0
c
0
0
c
12835
-------
RUN DATt 66/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-2A
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
GEORGIA
SECONDARY
PRELIMINARY
N 0
TREATMENI
UNKNOWN
O500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-1 OCOOO
1COOOO-250000
250000-500000
>50COOO
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
2
4
7
52
33
7
1
1
2
0
4
0
113
0 OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES T10N
IDENTIFIABLE SEKVED
2
4
7
47
28
4
0
1
2
0
1
0
96
3,000
925
3,200
49,435
64,215
24,300
1,500
35,000
115,750
0
632,845
0
930,170
TOTAL
0 OF
PLANTS
2
2
3
15
18
15
19
5
0
3
4
0
86
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES StKVEU
2
2
2
8
13
13
12
2
0
1
0
0
55
90,200
175
1,400
17,130
44,215
84,050
156,800
71,500
0
49,000
277,730
0
792,200
0
3
7
21
15
8
5
1
1
2
0
0
63
0
500
2,850
26,945
43,405
35,667
59,5dO
32,400
100,300
244,475
0
0
546,122
-------
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
GEORGIA
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
9
7
52
29
44
23
50
41
94
396
NUMBER
0
o
1
7
11
2
3
1
2
5
33
TOTAL
2,519,038
493,625
447,817
7,520, 887
7,266,886
6,382, 576
11,529,620
4,400,406
14,109,502
8,889,785
13,205,073
76,765,215
INTERCEPTORS
0
o
70,486
637,478
2,055,730
552, 886
716,951
44, 884
4,474,037
1(799,837
1(682,638
12,034,927
NUMBER
0
o
10
4
5
5
3
1
4
2
35
NUMBER
0
o
o
3
2
3
4
2
o
1
17
32
NEW PLANTS
0
o
56,010
2(863,564
1,231 ,283
1,991 (260
4,270,455
1 ,915,772
3,118,999
3,396,389
806,413
19(65C(145
OUTFALL
0
o
0
129,891
334,763
336(786
66C.578
508 (603
o
186(622
2(761 (221
4(918,464
NUMBER
1
4
3
8
7
2
1
o
0
o
27
NUMBER
0
o
o
9
8
3
13
2
6
6
7
53
LAGOONS
11(645
196(935
132,331
695(874
740,853
315,630
120,000
16(455
0
0
o
2,229,723
MISCELLANEOUS
0
o
o
1 ,323(704
799,446
451 ,309
2(633,317
388,004
778,466
437(448
1 ,826,306
8,628(500
NUMBER
4
o
o
1
3
3
4
1
1
3
3
23
NUMBER
4
2
2
15
6
11
14
13
36
25
60
188
REPL.6 ADDS
2(385(005
o
177(151
780,152
741(015
1 (592(792
377(921
1 ,785,951
31l( 100
1 (074(800
9(225(887
SFWERS
122,388
296,690
188,990
1,693,225
1 ,334,659
1,993,690
1, 53 5, 527
1 ,148,767
3,951,549
2,758,389
5,053,695
20,077,569
CO
-------
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
GEORGIA
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
00
*• 500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25C&0
25000-50000
500 00-100 000
lOOtOO-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
3
2
8
34
23
5
3
0
2
1
3
C
84
* OF POPULA-
COMHUNITIES TION
SERVED
1
2
8
28
20
4
1
C
2
C
I
0
67
35,090
740
4,050
36,475
64,840
26, 800
30,680
0
135,750
120,000
534,575
0
989,000
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
47
8
12
61
36
26
21
12
2
1
3
0
229
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
16
7
11
40
25
18
12
4
1
C
0
0
134
149,305
2,855
6,850
96,373
94,520
130,300
221,135
152,903
80,309
15,000
214,910
3
1,163,548
1
3
5
11
9
3
2
0
&
0
0
0
34
115,000
550
2,210
13,54L
28,220
21,450
17.93C.
0
0
0
0
u
198,870
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
GEORGIA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRFLIMINAPY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
00 2500-5000
cn
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
23
33
61
37
19
17
5
2
2
1
0
200
0
47
54
83
46
28
21
8
3
3
1
0
294
<=
0.5
0
0
1
3
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
6
1.0
0
10
14
9
8
4
3
4
0
0
1
0
53
\ f
1.2
0
7
9
8
6
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
34
«j. ur i
1.4
0
5
6
8
6
4
2
0
1
0
0
0
32
'i_«"i i a i
1.6
0
3
8
13
9
1
4
2
0
0
0
0
40
ITl il iC
1.8
0
0
2
9
5
5
2
0
1
0
0
0
24
LA 1 Cl»Ut
2.0
0
5
4
11
2
4
?.
0
0
1
0
0
29
4.0
0
11
2
6
3
0
1
0
c
0
0
0
23
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
oo
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
GEORGIA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
28
35
65
38
19
17
5
2
2
1
0
212
0
55
57
89
47
28
21
8
3
3
1
0
312
0.5
0
4
3
2
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
15
1.0
0
44
51
73
33
12
9
4
2
0
0
0
228
\ i
1.2
0
1
0
2
4
3
4
2
0
0
0
0
16
iu. ur r
1.4
0
1
0
3
1
2
1
0
0
2
0
0
10
LAP! 11 1
1.6
0
0
0
0
2
3
1
0
1
1
1
0
9
ft site
1.8
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
in I Cbun
2.0
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
T «.•««!
2.5
0
0
0
2
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
8
iu ur i
3.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.3
0
4
1
5
0
3
1
0
3
3
3
3
11
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
GEORGIA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
PRELIMINARY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. BOPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
CO
-** SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AMD ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
1
0
1
0
1400
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
42255
4
*
I
0
0
1
6000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
2
0
0
2
23920
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1000
6
*
1
0
1
0
34300
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
1
0
0
1
84700
3
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
13900
e
*
3
0
1
2
836965
15
0
0
5
4
5
1
0
0
c
0
84135
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
3
6
0
21
0
2
7
4
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
619855
367430
987285
0
0
1300
12675
22930
59430
44955
0
0
0
0
141290
-------
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4A
1<968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
GUAM
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
CD
°° 1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS «
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL # OF PC1PULA- NO. OF
# OF COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
PLANTS SERVED TIES SERVED
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1,125
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,125
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
05
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
GUAM
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IN'
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u. ur f
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LAN! i I
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
N -Slit
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ua i etoUK
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o •
0
0
0
T ^. = KBI
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
lu un
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
1
p
c
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
1
>4.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINAPY
TOTAL
1966 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
GUAM
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
CO
0 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
<-
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
IN
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u. UP r
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LHI i a i
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
m i itc
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
l, a i cull*
2.0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
I V*K» 1
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 U U P I
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t.o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>*.3
3
0
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
3
0
0
3
-------
TABLE A-2A
CO
HUN DATE 66/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
P K 1 M A R Y
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
H A M A I I
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
ICOO-2500
2500-50CO
5000-10COC
10COO-25000
25000-50COO
500 00-100000
1CCOOO-25COOC
250COO-5CCOOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
0
0
1
0
1
3
i
i
0
0
i
0
8
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0 0
0
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
c
0
0
6
0
75
0
500
12,080
4,020
8,725
0
0
920
0
26,320
TOTAL # OF POPULA- NO. OF
# OF COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
PLANTS IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
2
0
0
1
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
9
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
340
0
0
300
6,750
9,850
16,535
0
0
0
0
33,775
0
0
1
z
2
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
10
0
0
500
2,700
5,225
15,325
4,225
5,100
0
0
269,000
0
302,075
-------
TABLE A-M
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AHAKUS
H A W A I I
LD
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE.
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE.
NUMBER
0
. 2
. 2
. 4
. 13
. 15
• 0
• 36
. 84
NUMBER
0
. 0
. i
« 0
. 3
. 7
. 5
. 9
25
TOTAL
0
18C, 000
140, 190
265,575
2, 862, 639
4, 12C, 866
5,109,267
8,579,407
o
14,253,454
35,591, 398
INTERCEPTORS
0
0
o
134,280
c
432, 708
2,933, 989
2,984, 690
o
0
4, 154,021
10.639,688
NUMBER
0
o
1
o
1
2
o
2
Q
Q
I
7
NUMBER
0
o
0
1
0
2
o
3
D
10
NEW PLANTS
C
g
140,190
o
1,941 ,700
1 ,572 ,200
o
1 .977.4CO
o
o
1 , 755 ,151
7t 336,641
OUTFALL
0
o
Q
131 ,295
0
834,878
0
1 ,462 ,017
o
0
1 ,506,575
3,934,765
NUMBER
0
0
Q
o
o
o
o
o
0'
o
o
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
3
3
3
3
0
7
19
LAGOONS
0
Q
o
p
o
o
Q
o
o
A
MISCELLANEOUS
0
o
o
o
920,939
1 ,252,980
606,913
1 .474. fiOO
o
o
3 ,113,498
7,368,930
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
0
3
5
NUMBER
0
o
Q
Q
1
3
2
o
0
12
18
REPL.C ADDS
0
m. rtflft
o
o
Q
o
o
2,396,430
2, 576,430
SEWERS
0
<}
o
Q
28,100
1,648,365
730,700
o
0
1,327,779
3,734,944
-------
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4A
196H MUNICIPAL WASTE INVFNTnpv
H A W A I I
SECONDARY
N n
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
1000-2500
Co 2500-5000
5000-10000
11000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
IOJOOO-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
••< HF
PLANTS
i
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
# or POPIJLA-
CJ1MUNITIFS TIPM
SERVED
0
?
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
15,940
11,000
0
0
600
2,500
0
6,500
0
0
0
0
36,540
TDTAL # OF POPULA- NO. OF
(/ OF COMMUNITIES TION CQMMDN!- POPULATION
PLANTS SFPVFD TIES SFRVEO
a
i
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
14
4
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
7
15,400
2,000
0
2.500
200
0
24, POO
0
0
0
0
0
44,900
0
0
1
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
R
0
0
500
2,700
5,500
17,000
0
0
0
0
350,000
0
375,700
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
H A W A I I
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
500000
TOTALS
0
1
1
3
2
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
13
0
4
2
4
5
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
21
0.5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0
0
0
1
1
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.6
0
0
0
0-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
l.B
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2.5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
H A M A I I
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
———-——-———-- i mu« ur KLA^II in site i,« i CIJUKT ^»KAIIU 111-1
COMM. NO. OF <»
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
<-0 5000-10000
tn
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
1
1
3
2
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
13
0
4
2
*
5
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
21
0.5
0
0
0
0
1
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0
0
2
1
2
4
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.8
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o-
0
0
0
2.5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*.o
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
>4.0
0
1
3
0
3
0
3
3
3
3
3
3
1
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
H A H A I I
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
t£> SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249*999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
n
0
0
c
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
c
p
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
•o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
I-J
0
0
0
c
c
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
p
0
0
n
0
o
p
-------
TABLE A-8A
HAWAII
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
^£ 600
500-1000
1000-2500
'600-6000
5000-10000
10000-25000
26000-60000
Bbooo-Tooboo
100000-250000
260000-5GOOOO
^600000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oMater
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
3rim. to Sec.
Primary
Secondary
2
. 2
2
2
INTERCEPTORS
1
2
3
6
3
3
6
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfall
1
2
1
h
2
2
h
Interception
1
3
2
6
3
3
6
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Dthe
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
1
3
2
2
8
T8Ui f .oJietl
ICHEDULfD
8
10
18
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE: 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
IDAHO
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT.
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
00 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
6
9
11
6
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
37
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNIT1ES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
6
9
11
6
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
37
0
1,350
5i725
16,450
24,355
8,000
26,000
61,160
0
0
0
0
143,040
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
1
4
4
8
3
1
4
1
0
0
0
0
26
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
1
'4
4
8
3
1
4
1
0
0
0
0
26
1,400
2,724
2,380
12,295
10,750
9,000
49,000
30,000
0
0
0
0
117,549
0
6
7
7
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
0
1,380
3,995
11,350
15,185
10,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
42,410
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GfJOUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
IDAHO
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
CO POPULATION SUE GROUP
CO
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
3
5
19
17
13
4
15
16
0
0
0
92
NUMBER
1
0
3
0
4
1
4
2
0
0
0
15
TOTAL
31,415
469,543
860,114
1,354,645
1,370,227
623,476
4,350,081
562,588
0
0
0
9,672,089
INTERCEPTORS
30,464
0
43,027
0
341,529
21,406
506,044
71,670
0
0
0
1.014,140
NUMBER
0
0
I
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
NUMBER
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
NEW PLANTS NUMBER
0
0
51,697
196,622
SO .962
505.621
0
0
0
0
0
834,902
OUTFALL
0
C
23,835
65.850
28.096
0
0
0
0
0
0
117,781
1
1
6
6
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
19
NUMBER
0
2
4
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
10
LAGOONS
23,840
98,876
304,193
604.945
63C.080
84.735
0
25,240
0
0
0
1,771,909
MISCELLANEOUS
0
253,582
180,479
157,567
45,753
11.714
0
14.169
0
0
0
663 t 264
NUMBER REPL.E ADOS
0 P
0 0
I 77,105
1 14,374
2 216,127
0 (?
1 1.264,220
1 166.643
0 0
0 0
0 0
6
NUMBER
1
2
3
7
1
0
10
11
0
0
0
35
1,738,469
SEWERS
27,111
117,085
179,778
315,287
27,680
0
2,579,817
284,866
0
0
0
5TMT7624~
-------
TABLE A-4A
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
196? MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
IDAHO
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
4
5
6
4
1
2
2 "
0
0
0
0
24
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
0
4
5
6
4
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
24
0
850
3,055
10,400
13,355
10,000
38,000
71,000
0
0
0
0
146,660
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
13
20
15
9
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
65
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TIPN CQMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
1
13
19
15
9
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
64
2,000
6,050
13,240
21,155
30,200
17,575
48,000
55,000
0
0
0
0
193,220
0
?
3
5
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
240
1,650
7,600
5,000
4,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
18,990
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
IDAHO
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
10
11
17
9
0
8
2
1
0
0
0
58
0
10
11
17
9
0
8
2
1
0
0
0
58
< =
0.5
0
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
1.0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1 11
1.2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
u« ur r
1.4
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
LMPII i
1.6
0
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
in a i tc
1.8
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
' 0
0
4
V*« 1 CMUr
2.0
0
1
2
3
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
9
M S = tVH 1
2.5
0
2
0
4
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
10
lu ur /
3.0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
4
4.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
>4.0
0
P
2
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
c
6
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
IDAHO
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
13
21
23
12
2
8
2
1
0
0
0
82
0
13
21
23
12
2
a
2
1
0
0
0
82
0.5
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1.0
0
8
9
11
2
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
35
i n
1.2
0
1
1
4
3
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
11
u. ur r
1.4
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
LMHII3 1
1.6
0
0
0
I
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
3
n ->i tc
1.8
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
LB 1 CUUK
2.0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
T V»KMI
2.5
0
1
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
6
1U !jr i
3.0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4. 0
0
2
2
1
2
2
1
3
3
0
3
0
13
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
IDAHO
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
III
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
^
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
(1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
f>
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
p
p
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-8A
IDAHO
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
CI7C fit PI APF
Unknown
^^ BOO
soo-tooo
1000-2600
2600-5000
6000-10000
10000-25000
25oopr5opgp
BOOOO-lOOOOO
100000-260000
250000-500000
^600000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oPlater
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
2
2
2
$
1
12
3
9
12
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
2
3
$
h
1
2
2
19
6
3
1
2
2
U
1
19
Primary
Secondary
1
1
2
2
2
INTERCEPTORS
1
2
3
3
3
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
3
2
h
1
1
11
3
8
11
Outfall
3
1
*
1
1
3
6
11
Interception
1
1
1
1
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
3ther
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES.
2
1*
$
10
$
2
3
2
31
to T HI. rwuAcn
•CMEDUttD
FEU VIA!
i1?
33
1
2
2
u
2
£?
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-2A
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ILLINOIS
SECONDARY
PRELIMINARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=50C
500-1000
I-* 1000-2500
o
4/1 2500-5000
5000-10COO
1000.0-25COO
25000-50COO
500CO-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>50000C
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
6
2
U
25
11
6
9
<,
2
0
0
1
74
# OF POPULA- TOTAL
COMMUNITIES TION # OF
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED PLANTS
2
2
8
24
9
5
9
4
2
0
0
0
65
30t330
It 480
4,690
37,970
36,380
39,395
124,560
106,500
116,800
0
0
3,805
501,910
10
11
52
112
77
50
34
7
2
2
0
13
370
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
6
11
51
101
73
45
26
6
2
2
0
0
323
335,120
3,805
46,340
157,915
352,221
340,790
481,880
237,395
156,000
294,700
0
4,764,785
7,170,951
1
3
1
15
4
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
28
140,000
1,185
540
21,785
15,320
23,130
0
33,500
0
0
0
0
235,460
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
ILLINOIS
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
36
48
96
170
173
228
183
96
51
74
1,296
NUMBER
0
5
6
13
17
20
17
24
3
8 "
117
TOTAL
2,771,849
6,646,502
9,717,052
18,097,520
28,740,870
52,707,904
33,857, 580
35,267, 766
33,163,591
16,824, 160
53,454,676
291,249,470
INTERCEPTORS
0
182,835
265,199
1,543,454
5,611, 352
16,338,231
7,704,365
9,022, 217
15,497,810
6, 197,491
7,242,791
69,605,745
NUMBER
6
9
13
23
10
12
10
9
7
3
3
105
NUMBER
1
1
2
5
2
2
o
1
0
4
22
NEW PLANTS
695,066
2,811*710
1,279,522
3,253,833
2,187,635
3,675,269
3,946,805
3,677,332
5,341 ,777
640,138
395,830
27,904(917
OUTFALL
210,080
24,613
63,572
533,561
243,282
233,827
533,130
0
343,453
0
2,502,648
4,688,186
NUMBER
0
8
16
21
8
3
3
1
3
2
0
65
NUMBER
2
6
11
12
H
9
14
5
2
2
9
83
LAGOONS
0
292,454
819,203
1,214, 196
491,464
291,135
143,456
25,000
167,083
147,714
0
3,591,705
MISCELLANEOUS
56,367
382,22?
599,892
1,261,011
3,857,928
1(589,232
1,550,104
1,391,045
22,564
1,088, 250
5,120,888
16,919,503
NUMBER
6
1
13
21
34
44
31
13
19
7
20
209
NUMBER
21
19
36
53
92
64
148
138
40
34
30
695
REPL.6 ADDS
985.308
104,442
1,084,440
2,329,629
4,841,928
21 ,119,495
7,904,820
8,897,609
6,845,545
5,791,295
14,697,905
74,602,416
SEWERS
825,028
2*848,226
5,605,224
7*961,816
1 1,507,281
9,460,715
12,074,900
12,254,563
4,945,359
2,959,272
23,494,614
93,936,998
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CENSUS
1068 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
ILLINOIS
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
^•*
O 1000-2500
— J
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
7
1
7
IS
13
9
6
7
4
0
0
1
75
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
3
3
7
17
11
7
6
6
3
0
0
0
63
181,340
1,800
4,105
27,845
42,066
53,345
67,170
164,500
387,610
0
0
3,805
933,586
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
18
35
105
150
101
56
47
8
5
2
0
3
530
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION CflMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVFD TIES SERVED
11
33
96
135
78
46
31
5
3
2
0
0
440
368,665
18,372
81,575
222,660
361,190
397,460
568,010
200,715
301,000
240,000
0
4,771,990
7,540,637
0
2
2
11
?
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
875
2,575
13,875
5,495
5,195
0
0
0
0
0
0
28,015
-------
TABLE A-5A
HUM DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ILLINOIS
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
^ 2500-5000
§ 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
61
100
172
89
58
42
16
7
5
0
2
552
0
76
105
187
92
62
46
17
7
5
0
2
599
0.5
0
3
i
5
0
0
1
3
0
1
0
1
12
1.0
0
10
17
28
19
14
8
2
1
1
0
0
100
I r
1.2
0
2
22
27
14
11
5
1
0
0
0
0
82
LH
2.0
0
4
3
11
4
4
4
2
0
0
0
0
32
(T *.«KAI
2.5
0
6
4
12
12
2
4
3
3
1
0
c
47
1U ur I
3.0
0
3
5
9
2
4
1
2
0
0
0
0
26
3.5
0
6
1
5
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
16
4.0
0
3
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
>4.0
0
23
6
6
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
39
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
ILLINOIS
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
Q 5000-10000
03
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
62
102
172
89
61
42
16
8
5
0
3
560
0
77
108
187
93
65
47
17
8
5
0
3
610
<=
0.5
0
35
44
36
9
3
5
1
0
0
0
0
133
1.0
0
21
33
ee
42
34
17
4
1
2
0
0
242
1 I
1.2
0
2
10
13
18
10
14
3
1
0
0
0
71
MU. Ul- 1
1.4
0
3
5
13
5
5
3
3
3
1
0
0
41
'LANIi 1
1.6
0
3
8
14
8
5
3
3
0
0
0
0
44
IN i lit
1.8
0
2
0
3
2
•5
0
1
1
0
0
0
14
LAI tbUK
2.0
0
2
2
4
2
3
2
0
1
1
0
0
17
T *«KAI
2.5
0
2
1
6
5
0
0
1
1
1
0
2
I"
i'j ji-i
3.0
0
I
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
4
3.5
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
5
,.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.D
3
5
5
7
1
0
1
3
3
0
0
0
19
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
ILLINOIS
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
ICOOO - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
4
0
0
4
1520
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
1
0
0
1
6500
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4270
3
*
10
0
3
7
28730
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9255
4
*
8
0
2
6
58425
3
0
2
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3090
5
*
8
0
2
6
144215
5
0
0
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
32610
6
*
1
0
0
1
38COO
3
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
27150
7
*
5
0
0
5
34600C
9
0
0
3
0
1
5
0
0
0
0
19C835
a
*
7
1
0
6
5269700
120
6
4
29
29
33
10
8
0
0
1
5193755
9
*
0
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
44
1
7
36
0
145
6
6
41
32
36
15
fl
0
0
1
0
0
140000
52735
5700355
5893090
0
2290
4730
107700
211760
568910
468715
546455
0
0
3550405
5460965
-------
TABLE A-8A
ILLINOIS
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
^C 600
500-1000
1000-2500
2600-5000
EOOO-10000
10000-25000
25000-80000
60000-700000
100000-260000
250000-500000
>scfoooo
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 or later
Date hot given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
11
3
1
3
1
19
3
h
1
2
3
6
19
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
'rim. to Sec.
3
1
3
3
$
3
1
1
1
21
u
1
$
6
$
21
Primary
1
1
2
1
1
2
Secondary
1
1
1
1
INTERCEPTORS
1
1
2
1
1
2
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
10
2
11
16
9
1U
7
2
1
2
7U
21
U
3
31
12
3
7U
Outfall
Interception
Plant
$
3
3
1*
1
1
1
1
1
20
k
13
3
20
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
$
1
h
5
1
l
2
19
19
19
Othe
1
2
2
1
1
7
2
1
2
2
7
NUMBER OF
CQMMUNiriES
20
2
15
26
20
20
10
3
5
1
1
123
tCHfOULED
31
12
6
Il2
#
19
l#
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
INDIANA
SEC ONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-25CO
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
TUTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
0
1
12
9
5
9
3
0
2
0
0
41
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES T10N
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
0
1
12
8
5
9
3
0
1
0
0
39
0
0
670
19,490
25,920
33,955
127,030
110,055
0
141,500
0
0
458,670
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
Q
7
5
30
26
30
22
8
2
10
8
0
148
* UF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COHMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SEKVEU
0
7
5
28
26
27
16
7
2
4
1
0
123
0
2,580
4,070
52,185
101,125
195,765
245,880
295,055
111,385
624,750
481,910
0
2,114,705
2
10
39
61
13
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
128
8.815
3,935
29,130
82,845
42,825
17,035
0
0
84,885
0
0
0
269,470
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
INDIANA
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
250,000 AND OVER...
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 32
....... 100
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 0
TOTAL
1,599,687
589, 329
7,336,046
16,238,923
16,219,954
20,299,933
10,968,359
21,738,433
4,960.055
28.488,909
37,607.628
166,047, 256
INTERCEPTORS
0
n
697,919
1,918,805
1,672,517
6, 590.461
3.072.614
6.467,307
2,162.091
6.625, 382
7.485,420
36.692,516
NUMBER
8
4.
11
29
11
5
1
1 •
1
0
2
73
NUMBER
0
1
o
0
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
1
NEW PLANTS
721,498
183,132
1,412,428
4,610 ,038
3,961 ,350
1,415,256
694,195
20,000
84,653
0
7,647,956
20.750,506
OUTFALL
0
33,969
0
0
o
0
0
o
0
0
0
33,969
NUMBER
1
0
1C
3
3
1
1
0
o
0
o
19
NUMBER
2
o"
3
6
3
3
3
1
0
2
27
LAGOONS
20,000
0
856,247
468, 786
346,959
505,500
402,165
0
0
0
0
2,599,657
MISCELLANEOUS
73,438
0
288,251
733,618
785,564
3,466,469
1 ,548,542
476,672
0
785,363
999,745
9,157,662
NUMBER
5
1
5
8
8
6
8
0
6
a
55
NUMBER
16
4
28
56
49
54
73
64
11
118
78
551
REPL.t ADDS
3?9,900
0
60 ,835
367,701
1 ,379,899
2, 677.811
774,641
7,611,987
0
11,740,375
14,625,396
39,568,547
SEWFRS
454,851
372,228
4,020,366
8,139,975
8,073,665
5 ,644,434
4,476,202
7,162,467
2,713,31 1
9,337,789
6.849.111
57,244,399
-------
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
INDIANA
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
1
0
3
12
*
5
e
2
1
3
0
0
44
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TIC1N
SERVEO
1
0
3
12
8
5
6
2
1
1
0
0
39
50
0
3tl90
21,420
24,565
35,740
102,470
63,855
70,000
141,560
0
0
462,850
T'JTAL
# <)F
PLAMTS
36
7
29
58
37
32
27
10
2
11
7
0
256
* nr PDPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIPS SERVEO
8
7
26
57
36
28
19
8
2
4
1
0
196
38,750
2,910
21,380
95,375
144,160
216,290
282,740
340,045
111,385
688,920
492,300
0
2,434,255
1
<9
30
38
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
82
2,000
4,155
21,550
47,230
13,115
5,765
0
0
1 4,885
0
0
0
108,700
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
INDIANA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
14
35
65
46
37
24
10
4
4
1
0
240
0
31
47
82
48
41
25
10
4
5
1
0
294
<=
0.5
0
0
3
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1.0
0
9
13
13
8
6
1
0
0
0
0
0
50
1 i>
1.2
0
8
9
16
10
5
4
0
0
0
0
0
52
in. ur r
1.4
0
4
5
14
1
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
32
•lama i
1.6
0
1
5
18
7
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
38
n iitc
1.8
0
2
5
7
4
3
3
2
0
0
0
0
26
in i cuur
2.0
0
0
1
4
2
5
1
1
0
1
0
0
15
*T S=R«I
2.5
0
2
3
6
12
6
7
2
0
2
I
0
41
lu ur i
3.0
0
0
4
2
1
3
3
3
1
0
0
0
17
3.5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
4
4.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
p
4
>4.0
0
4
1
2
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
C
11
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1966 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
INDIANA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINAPY
COMM. NO. Of
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
> 5 000 00
TOTALS
0
15
35
65
46
37
24
10
5
4
1
0
242
0
33
48
82
48
41
25
10
5
5
1
0
298
<«
0.5
0
1
3
8
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
1.0
0
9
19
34
23
12
5
1
0
1
0
0
104
\ T
1.2
0
e
12
15
7
13
5
0
0
0
0
0
60
fu. ur r
1.4
0
4
1
5
4
3
3
0
0
0
• 0
0
20
•LBN 1 9 1
1.6
0
1
3
9
1
1
3
2
0
1
0
0
21
in site
i.a
0
2
5
3
6
1
3
0
1
0
0
0
21
in i tour
2.0
0
0
2
1
0
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
10
4.0
a
7
3
1
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
3
12
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
INDIANA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMK./FAC.
BELOW 500
500 - 999
1000 - 4999
5000 - 9999
10000 - 24999
25000 - 49999
50000 - 99999
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE
POPULATION SERVED
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SFRVED
1*
2*
3*
4*
5*
6*
T*
a*
9*
0*
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
2
0
0
2
12800
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2800
5
*
0
c
c
r
0
0
0
c
c
0
0
c
0
c
0
c
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
\
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
1
0
o
1
132000
4
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
27145
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
3
0
5
0
c
1
2
2
0
c
0
c
r>
0
0
0
r,
144800
144800
0
p
0
2800
15445
11700
0
o
0
0
0
29945
-------
TABLE A-8A
INDIANA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
^C i°JL
600-1000
1000-2600
2600-6000
eopo-iopQp
10000-2SOOO
26000-60000
eOOOO-TOOOOO
100000-260000
260000-600000
^600050
Total
_ INDICATE!)
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oT'later
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
6
7
28
31
h
76
1U
17
37
7
1
76
EXPANSION/UPGRADWG/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
1
2
3
1
3
2
1
1
Hi
1
3
1
8
1
Ik
Primary
1
1
2
2
2
Secondary
1
2
ll
2
5
i
$
1
21
6
5
8
2
21
INTERCEPTORS
1
1
1
1
li
1
3
li
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
1
1
6
23
9
8
10
2
1
$
.1*
70
Hi
5
7
30
1
13
70
Outfall
Interception
1
1
1
1
Plant
3
3
1
2
1
1
11
3
li
1
1
2
11
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Dther
1
2
13
Hi
7
2
1
u
1
US
l
1*0
li
1£
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
8
9
3$
60
33
29
20
10
3
$
1
213
TBT»L MAJKtl
ICHIDULfD
l4l
12
32
8*
53
21
2ii^
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
P R I MARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
IOWA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
10COOO-25COOO
250000-500000
>3CCOOO
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
9
9
9
1
1
0
2
2
0
0
0
33
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
C
9
9
5
1
1
0
2
2
0
0
0
29
0
2,360
5il75
6f 370
4-, 000
5,500
0
66,000
136,000
0
0
0
225,405
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
4
30
116
101
41
31
9
4
2
1
0
0
339
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
4
28
112
95
37
28
5
4
2
1
C
0
316
14,300
8,955
71,160
129,655
113,855
180,100
80,000
116,000
155,000
208,000
0
0
1,077,025
0
8
21
25
4
1
3
1
i
0
0
0
65
0
2,505
11,600
30,065
13,200
6,500
46,500
30,000
134,000
0
0
0
274,370
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
I D W A
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 13
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 0
10
TOTAL
139,088
4,187,035
7,334,265
4,737, 513
5,371,197
7, 134,141
10,888,976
9,204,431
11,455, 295
9,247,062
o
69,699,003
INTERCEPTORS
0
41, 263
281,488
173,604
83,093
1,194,934
1,992, 700
3,007, 875
2,053,391
487, 158
0
9,315,506
NUMBER
1
8
14
9
6
4
3
I
1
1
o
48
NUMBER
1
14
27
9
3
3
4
3
1
1
0
66
NEW PLANTS
9, CBS
451(540
1,243,317
1,026(296
1(544,024
1*806,810
2(652,851
1,059,973
684 ,200
20,000
o
10(498(096
OUTFALL
10,557
255,747
603,159
355,206
340,962
206,701
848,048
463,671
8 ,362
1 ,693,005
0
4,785.418
NUMBER
4
30
41
15
2
2
3
0
o
o
o
97
NUMBER
0
5
9
6
1
3
1
1
1
o
0
27
LAGOONS
36,440
823(405
1,274,529
663(441
133,491
302, 685
233,133
0
o
o
o
3,467, 124
MISCELLANEOUS
0
288,558
406,223
368(038
83,800
599,116
569,200
89,477
10,210
o
0
2,414,622
NUMBER
C
o
3
8
9
6
3
3
7
4
o
43
NUMBER
7
39
39
48
52
55
62
53
106
54
0
515
RFPL.C ADOS
0
o
76,972
548,327
1(117,2 77
856,094
1,562,707
1 ,948,968
4(212,059
3,780,655
o
14,103,059
SEWERS
83,006
2,326,522
3 ,448,577
1,602.601
2,068,550
2,167,801
3,030,337
2,634,467
4,487,073
3,266,244
0
25,115,178
-------
I960 CFNSUS
TABLE A-4A
1°68 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
I n w A
SECONDARY
N 0
PRF.I IMINARY
TP FATMFNT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-1 00000
100000-250000
250000-5COOOO
>5 00000
TOTALS
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
0
7
3
a
0
1
3
3
4
0
0
0
30
u nr POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TIPN
SF.PVFO
0 0
7 1 ,710
3 2,075
o 12,675
0 0
1 5,500
3 46,500
3 "6,000
4 27R.OOO
0 0
0 0
0 0
?0 442,480
TOTAL
0 OF
PLANTS
3
79
165
117
45
34
11
4
3
2
0
0
46?
* OF POPULA- MO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SFRVFD TIPS SFRVFD
?
77
160
10R
41
29
5
4
2
1
0
0
420
4,200
73,380
98, Q45
140, 690
124,910
195,100
80,700
IIP, 200
175,000
21^, ftOG
0
0
1 , Ifil ,225
0
'
P
10
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
24
0
°50
4,050
12,?00
7,000
6,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
30,790
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
I 0 H A
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGORY <-RATIO OF)
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
ro 5000-10000
r>o
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
> 5 000 00
TOTALS
0
92
150
95
35
26
8
7
6
1
0
0
420
0
99
161
101
35
29
8
7
6
1
0
0
447
0.5
0
3
5
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
1.0
0
23
45
29
9
7
0
1
0
0
0
0
114
1.2
0
12
17
16
4
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
52
1.4
0'
9
26
12
6
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
59
1.6
0
18
24
18
5
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
67
1.8
0
8
15
6
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
31
2.0
0
5
10
4
2
4
1
1
3
0
0
0
30
2.5
0
14
7
5
2
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
35
3.0
0
2
*
3
2
4
0
1
1
0
0
0
18
3.5
0
0
1
2
I
0
1
0
I
0
0
0
6
4.0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
0
c
0
0
0
4
>4.C
0
5
6
3
I
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
17
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
i*O
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
IOWA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
113
162
102
35
27
a
7
6
1
0
0
461
0
123
174
ioe
35
30
8
7
6
1
0
0
492
0.5
0
111
130
69
27
10
6
2
2
0
0
0
357
1.0
0
9
33
24
6
9
0
4
0
1
0
0
86
IP
1.2
0
2
3
4
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
iu< ur Y
1.4
0
1
3
4
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
12
U»mS 1
1.6
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
6
IN il it
1.6
0
0
2
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
IA 1 CbUK
2.0
0
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
6
T ^=KAI
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
lu ur i
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.3
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
fO
.e-
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500
500 - 999
1000 - 4999
5000 - 9999
10000 - 24999
25000 - 49999
50000 - 99999
100000 - 24999
250000 - 49999
500000 AND ABOVE
POPULATION SERVED
IOWA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
1
*
AC. 0
0
0
0
,VEO 0
.C. 0
1* 0
i 2* 0
'9 3* 0
'9 4* 0
199 5* 0
199 6* 0
199 7* 0
'999 8* 0
1999 9* 9
IVE 0* 0
:VEO o
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
1
0
0
1
4000
5
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5450
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
1
0
0
1
120CO
1
1
0
C
fl
0
0
0
0
C
0
280
6
*
2
0
1
1
64000
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3400
7
2
0
t
1
170000
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
p
14500
8
*
1
0
0
1
208000
3
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
6500
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
'0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
2
5
0
1,
3
1
5
I
3
P
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
111000
3470CO
458000
P
133P
950
78 50
150C
18500
0
C
p
0
0
3013P
-------
TABLE A-8A
IOWA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SJZE OF PLACE
Unknown
^^ 600
600-1000
1000 --25 00
2500-5000
EOOO-10COO
10000-25000
25000-60000
50000-100000
100000-260000
250000-500000
^•500000
"Tolii
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 or'later
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
Secondary
li
$
7
1
17
13
3
1
17
i EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec.
1
1
9
1
1
2
Primary
1
2
2
1
A
1
2
3
6
Secondary
1
9
20
17
10
6
3
1
67
m
1*
36
2
67
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
1
1
3
1
*
2
2
T£
1$
IS
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Othe
NUMBER OF
CQMMUNiriES
2
IS
29
31
12
6
7
It
3
109
WTAL MOM*
SCHEDULED
PER TIAI
29
23
16
39
3
110
CO
Ol
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
KANSAS
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
to 1000-2500
CD
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
i
2
9
12
5
3
2
1
0
1
2
0
38
It OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
2
9
12
5
3
2
1
0
c
0
0
34
650
450
5.540
17,290
18.170
19,100
37.000
32.800
0
8,000
4,300
0
143,300
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
5
62
71
77
32
9
19
2
0
1
6
0
284
« OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SEKVED
4
61
69
75
31
9
17
2
0
1
1
0
270
10,000
20,135
112,480
117,735
99,840
66,300
231,400
81,000
0
119,400
310,850
0
1,169,140
1
2
2
2
2
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
12
1,200
460
1,000
2,850
a, 300
0
35,000
0
0
107,000
0
0
155,810
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
KANSAS
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
I-*
ro " Tn"""" " " """" "
""' POPULATION sTzl GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
10
135
37
64
46
30
147
65
1
178
139
852
NUMBER
0
3
2
I
2
3
3
\
o
18
1
34
TOTAL
143,396
5, 801, 709
2,030, 811
3,944, 756
3, 169,243
2, 102, 6C2
8,109, 825
4,506, 335
18, 163
30,159,674
4,898,033
64,884, 547
INTERCEPTORS
0
75. ^59
59,622
20, 197
131, 325
102, 905
558,560
12,872
o
7,619, 824
5,359
8,586.023
NUMBER
1
7
I
9
I
Q
^
1
o
2
o
23
NUMBER
0
2
1
2
1
o
o
1
o
4
1
12
NEW PLANTS
12,417
JRfl.fi BO
B9,2CC
1 ,087,094
159,423
7,568
39,732
o
3,782,584
o
5 ,428 ,076
OUTFALL
0
35.AQ1
9 ,736
62 ,303
44,295
0
o
9,970
o
1,449,101
141 ,911
1.742.409
NUMBER
0
A?
9
g
2
t
o
o
o
1
Q
63
NUMBER
1
?>
4
5
4
3
3
1
o
5
o
48
LAGOONS
0
1 . 3QQ „ CCA
* *,4. OAA
556. R1 &
226, 446
&. 757
n
o
Q
22,000
Q
2,573,661
MISCELLANEOUS
14,895
7na . R4rt
1 1 ^.7Oft
•It T. C4A
49 9 , 8 8 7
804, 135
158,772
ft 1 . 71 ?
o
1 ,347, 510
Q
4.043.003
NUMBER
4
6.
9
i
9
5
o
9
Q
47
NUMBER
4
5ft
1 5
15
77
?»
131
56
1
139
137
625
REPL.C ADDS
65.421
*7*i * A1 1
A3? » K & Q
qe-a .inn
l it Q nor.
7*11 7*fc4n
l»37l f 886
0
4? 267t 167
Q
9»926f 383
SEWFRS
50,663
3- 94A. 2O<\
1 .ftl A.A6.R
1 . 4ft 7. 7^1?
1.1 54.4R7
1 . fift7. AOS
5 1 067 * 28 5
7 .oen.l *,a
1 8*163
U.671 .4AR
4* 750t 763
32.564.992
-------
1960 CENSUS
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
KANSAS
PRIMARY SFCCNOARY
N 0
PRFLIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
t~t 1000-2500
ro
00 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-?5UOO
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-253000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
it
2
7
10
5
3
4
1
0
1
2
0
39
* Pf POPULA-
CCMMUNITIES TION
SERVFD
2
•>
7
10
5
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
33
13,700
550
5,650
14, BOO
2A,600
19,875
110,000
43,000
0
9,000
700
0
242, B75
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
14
13"
R8
83
35
10
20
3
0
•y
7
0
401
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SFRVFD TIES SFRVFO
11
131
R4
79
32
10
17
•>
0
1
0
0
374
43,*75
46,130
140,360
147,170
110,535
84,000
330,550
86,575
0
120,300
310. WO
0
1,428,795
0
10
2
I
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
15
750
2,605
955
1,190
3,800
0
0
0
0
218,000
0
0
227,300
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
KANSAS
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
132
94
96
42
15
21
9
1
1
1
0
412
0
136
96
100
47
18
21
9
1
1
1
0
430
< =
0.5
0
1
3
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
1.0
0
8
19
25
9
5
4
2
1
0
0
0
73
1 11
1.2
0
11
IB
11
16
2
7
3
0
0
1
0
69
VI. \Jf r-
1.4
0
38
17
22
9
1
4
1
0
0
0
0
92
u *v * < ** i.
1.6
0
23
17
19
3
4
5
0
0
0
0
0
71
1.8
0
15
5
5
3
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
31
2.0
0
13
8
10
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
2.5
0
13
7
3
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
3.0
0
7
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
3.5
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
5
4.0
0
C
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
>4.C
0
*
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
n
C
0
6
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
KANSAS
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
CONM. NO. OF <»
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
C.O 5000-10000
o
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
134
94
96
42
15
21
9
I
1
1
0
414
0
138
96
101
47
18
21
9
1
1
1
0
433
0.5
0
3
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
1.0
0
86
62
76
33
13
8
6
1
0
1
0
286
1.2
0
29
22
10
10
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
75
«U« ur i
1.4
0
8
2
5
2
1
8
0
0
0
0
0
26
•i. « 11 1 a i
1.6
0
4
2
3
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
12
"i a i ic
1.9
0
0
3
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
in i CUUP
2.0
0
1
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
T S-KBI
2.5
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
1U UP 1
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
3
5
1
1
9
0
1
a
0
3
0
0
e
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
KANSAS
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMH./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500300 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
1
0
0
1
1090
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
660
2
*
1
0
C
1
850
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
1
i
0
0
1200
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1200
4
*
1
0
0
1
7000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
1
0
0
1
14500
1
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
890
6
*
1
1
0
0
41000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
1
0
0
1
60000
7
1
0
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
64010
8
*
3
1
0
2
479400
5
2
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
12865
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<;
10
3
0
7
0
17
6
1
5
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
108200
0
49684C
605040
0
1695
890
9030
21545
21110
25355
0
0
0
0
79625
-------
TABLE A-8A
KANSAS
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACIUTIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
<< 600_
600-1000
1000-2500
2600-5000
EOOO-IOpOp
10000-26000
26000-60000
50000-100000
100000-260000
250000-5GOOOO
^600060
Total
INDICAtED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 or later
Date not given
Total Projects
NEV
Primary
1
1
1
T
I/ PLANT
Secondary
2
7
1
1
11
2
<
1
3
n
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
3
T
1
7
?
^
2
7
Primary
Secondary
1
1
2
2
p
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
3ther
NUMBER OF
3
8
ll
J,
1
1
21
W»l PHoJlCTl
SCHEDULED
PE* T1AI
3
7
),
7
PT
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
19oO CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
KENTUCKY
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5COO-1COOO
10000-25000
25000-50COO
50000-10COCO
100COC-250000
250COO-50COOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
1
3
11
8
1
3
4
0
0
1
0
33
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
1
1
3
11
8
1
3
3
C
0
1
C
32
146, 380
1,200
2,555
15,390
26,550
7,120
50,375
133,290
0
0
399,375
0
782,235
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
1
5
19
17
16
7
2
4
0
7
0
79
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SEKVEU
0
1
4
17
17
15
7
1
1
0
0
0
63
615
600
3,275
33,245
64,960
99,675
88,365
3,900
66,610
0
16,120
0
377,365
0
1
5
28
12
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
48
0
450
4,050
41,635
42,965
14,445
0
0
C
0
0
0
103,545
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
KENTUCKY
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
19
30
42
115
80
66
31
31
83
&
210
713
NUMBER
0
4
7
26
12
3
&
tf
6
o
12
80
TOTAL
936*026
2,080.337
4,280*220
16.223*643
15,475,456
8.476.095
5,264,087
3,224,381
7.775.892
1. 179.417
14, 291,938
79.207.492
INTERCEPTORS
0
193. 849
668.798
2(454(681
a.Ofli ,O51
937.764
1(699(262
149(002
1,117, 698
o
2(619.575
12(841(680
NUMBER
7
5
8
30
21
2
1
2
o
o
7
83
NUMBER
0
2
o
2
1
3
1
o
3
0
o
12
NEW PLANTS
377(391
370(296
836(863
4(485(649
5.425.884
838(352
524(864
256(205
o
739,339
13(854(843
OUTFALL
0
73(548
o
115.268
154(445
382(820
20(000
o
465 (056
o
o
1(211(137
NUMBER
0
»
2
5
o
o
o
g
o
q
NUMBER
1
^
^
13
9
6
4
3
4
I
4
56
LAGOONS
0
48.994
91.694
534.585
o
o
o
q
o
675.771
MISCELLANEOUS
17,047
151.382
355.934
754*437
QQl -AHA
445.842
314.323
263. 168
57.682
605.235
813.660
4,770.116
NUMBER
3
1
4
7
1
2
4
2
NUMBER
8
12
17
35
*?
45
18
20
66
5
185
443
REPL.G ADOS
348.589
lit 424
BQR .4R*
1. IDA. 7Ofl
2.1 **7. ATQ
319.351
28,451
*cn.*AT
539(000
5. A'»7. Al i
SEWERS
192,999
1(242,268
2.315,507
7.283.668
&.SQS .B7?
3.733(438
2*386*287
2,527-555
5 * 784, 889
574, 1ft?
9, 500.364
40. 217.020
-------
I960 CENSUS
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
KFNTUCKY
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
50C-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
2500C-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLAMTS
3
1
1
8
6
2
3
3
0
0
1
0
28
# OF POPULA-
CUMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
3
1
1
8
6
2
3
3
0
0
1
0
28
164,680
460
700
12,770
23,145
15,595
50,375
108,950
0
0
399,375
0
776,050
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
33
16
16
54
45
15
8
3
6
0
7
0
203
« OF PDPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
11
10
14
52
32
15
7
1
1
0
0
0
143
40,000
4,950
11.760
82,462
132,120
99,675
92,100
29,740
70,710
0
16.120
0
579,637
0
1
6
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
450
4,685
7,125
4,825
0
0
0
1,300
0
0
0
18,385
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
CO
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
KENTUCKY
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
O500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
17
22
63
38
18
9
4
1
1
1
1
175
0
30
36
83
43
19
9
4
1
1
1
1
228
0.5
0
0
I
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1.0
0
22
17
23
5
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
71
1 r
1.2
0
2
7
12
7
3
I
1
0
0
0
0
33
«u« ur t
0
0
1
16
11
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
29
•ta^ia i
1.6
0
1
2
8
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
18
IN site
1.8
0
0
1
8
5
3
1
2
0
0
0
0
20
V,A 1 tl»U*
2.0
0
0
0
5
3
3
2
1
1
0
0
0
15
IT *, = K« I
2.5
0
3
2
4
1
3
0
P
0
0
0
0
13
IU UH
3.0
0
0
1
C
2
2
0
0
C
0
1
0
6
3.5
0
1
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
4.C
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
>4.0
0
1
3
?
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
9
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
KENTUCKY
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COHM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
17
22
63
38
18
9
4
1
1
1
1
175
0
30
36
83
43
19
9
4
1
1
1
1
228
<=
0.5
0
0
I
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1.0
0
22
17
24
5
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
72
i r
1.2
0
2
7
13
7
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
34
MU« ur i
1.4
0
0
1
15
11
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
28
•L«IMI i 1
1.6
0
1
2
8
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
18
in 3 i ic
1.8
0
0
1
8
5
3
1
2
0
0
0
0
20
\,a i cuui
2.0
0
0
0
5
3
•>
2
1
1
0
0
0
15
*T V=N«I
2.5
0
3
2
4
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
i u ur i
3.0
0
0
1
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
6
3.5
0
1
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
».o
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
>4.>
0
1
3
1
1
3
i
0
D
0
3
1
8
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
CD
KENTUCKY
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1745
8
*
1
0
1
0
1 463 80
20
6
3
5
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
149870
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
21
6
3
6
3
1
I
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
146380
0
146380
0
149P
2515
17650
24620
14895
30070
60375
0
0
0
151615
-------
TABLP, A-8A
KENTUCKY1
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
I
H*
CO
CO
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
<£ 600
Rnn innn
1000-2500
2500-5000
EOOO-10000
10000-25000
26000-60000
Boobo-lboboo
100000-250000
250000-500000
>»500060
Total
iNDICATED
COMiPLETICN DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 cir*iater
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW
Primary
2
3
i
8
8
8
PLANT
Secondary
13
2
1
1
i
18
18
18
1 EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
»rim. to Sec.
1
1
2
2
2
Primary
1
1
1
1
Secondary
1
1
7
1,
3
2
1
19
19
19
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Other
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
1*
3
<
12
*
3
2
1
1
1
ii8
TOTAL MOJICT1
ICHEDULED
tlK VIA*
liB
iiB
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
P R I M A K Y
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
LOUISIANA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<*500
500-10CO
1000-25CO
2500-50CO
5000-10COO
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
UCOOO-25COOO
250000-500000
>50000C
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
1
C
3
4
1
1
C
0
0
1
0
0
11
# UF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
1
C
3
4
1
0
0
C
C
1
0
0
10
11,300
0
1,650
4,960
500
1,000
0
0
0
193,485
0
0
212,895
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
5
10
8
15
28
18
15
7
10
0
0
0
116
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI-
EDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES
2
3
8
12
26
17
11
2
1
0
0
0
82
73,460
5,575
5,470
26,305
88,248
104,320
164,775
66,675
74,335
0
0
0
614,163
1
0
1
6
8
4
6
2
1
1
0
1
31
POPULATION
SfcKVtO
1,800
0
875
a, 765
25,655
27,140
88,910
68,470
52,000
160,000
0
840,000
1,273,615
-------
TABLE A-JA
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
LOUISIANA
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
16
9
3
33
65
29
72
10
73
106
1
422
NUMBER
0
o
o
8
12
5
5
o
7
7
o
44
TOTAL
762i588
737(606
2,234,487
4,293, 813
14? 723, 852
5,042, 788
16,501,733
2,975,471
24,605, 880
31,439,807
56, 225
103,374, 250
INTERCEPTORS
0
o
0
740,000
3,380,330
919,954
1,448,460
o
3,251, 528
2,432,252
0
12,172,524
NUMBER
4
2
1
2
3
it
7
1
4
a
0
36
NUMBER
1
o
o
o
1
o
o
I
3
o
o
6
NEW PLANTS
143,560
487,346
395,000
226,877
776,909
1,815,754
4,130,920
817,500
5,692,413
4,089,285
c
18,575,564
OUTFALL
21,000
0
0
0
683,584
0
0
32,675
2,198,069
0
o
2,935.328
NUMBER
0
j.
1
8
5
1
5
0
2
0
o
23
NUMBER
2
1
2
6
12
4
13
2
13
15
0
70
LAGOONS
0
12,973
31 ,963
680,825
334,985
84,260
485,569
0
35,760
0
0
1 ,666,335
MISCELLANEOUS
32,384
23,062
119,230
1,317,604
2,626,790
185.429
4,039,776
818,833
2,995,831
10,258,155
0
22,417,094
NUMBER
2
o
0
1
o
3
8
0
8
2
0
24
NUMBER
7
5
4
8
32
12
34
6
36
74
1
219
REPL.G ADOS
463,112
o
o
92,255
0
553,591
997,079
0
3,632.433
17,431
0
5,755,901
SEWERS
102,532
214, 2?5
1,688,294
1.236,252
6,921,254
1,483,800
5,399,929
1 ,306,463
6,799,846
14.642.684
56,225
39,851,504
-------
TABLE A-4A
ro
I960 CENSUS
P R I MARY
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
LOUISIANA
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
It OF
PLANTS
1
0
2
5
0
i
2
0
0
0
0
1
12
« OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
1
0
2
4
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
195,000
0
1,100
5,975
0
1.000
19,200
0
0
0
0
1*0,000
371,275
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
15
6
11
26
45
20
19
6
11
6
0
2
167
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION CnHMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
3 210.
4 16.
11 8.
24 45,
32 174,
17 i?e.
12 I*0.
2 93,
? 13",
1 5,
0
0 12,
108 1,026,
ROO
730
985
905
550
075
520
520
590
970
0
500
135
1
0
0
5
3
4
4
2
0
1
0
1
21
5,
12,
500
0
0
915
13.ABO
31,
77,
77,
1°6,
518,
932,
5flO
250
670
0
000
0
500
e°5
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1966 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
LOUISIANA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
3
5
16
18
25
9
ft
0
1
0
0
81
0
17
9
21
21
26
11
6
0
2
0
0
113
<«
0.5
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
1.0
0
2
3
7
7
it
3
4
0
0
0
0
30
i r
1.2
0
4
0
5
1
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
16
4.0
0
3
1
2
3
0
1
0
C
0
0
0
10
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
L 0 U I S I ANA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
3
6
19
20
26
9
4
0
1
0
0
88
0
17
10
24
23
27
11
6
0
2
0
0
120
0.5
0
1
1
1
2
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
11
1.0
0
3
3
13
11
7
5
4
0
0
0
0
46
I r
1.2
0
4
0
3
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
«u« ur t
1.4
0
0
4
2
2
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
14
•kHPM a I
1.6
0
1
0
1
2
3
3
0
0
1
0
0
11
4.3
0
3
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
LOUISIANA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4+
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
J
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
!)
2
*
0
R
G
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
1
0
1
0
113CC
1
0
0
c
0
1
0
0
0
c
0
9000
6
*
0
f)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
*
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
r*
1
o
n
1
n
c
0
c
1
p
0
n
c
0
0
0
c
11300
0
11300
c
c
r
0
0
9000
r
n
0
0
0
9000
-------
TABLE A-2A
CD
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIM!NAKY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MAINE
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMtNF
UNKNOWN
<«50C
500-1000
1COO-2500
2500-5000
500Q-1COOO
1COOO-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-25COOO
250000-5COOOO
>5000CO
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
3
6
2
3
0
0
0
0
c
14
n OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
0
c
2
5
2
1
C
C
0
0
c
1C
0
c
0
2,575
13,300
2,700
10,220
0
0
0
0
0
28,795
TOTAL « OF POPULA- NO. OF
* OF COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
PLANTS IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
a
0
0
0
0
3
0
C
c .
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
c
c
2
0
0
0
0
200
600
14,400
0
0
0
0
0
15,200
0
1
5
31
26
13
11
2
1
0
0
0
90
0
120
3,650
36,708
65,600
61,700
141,630
61,000
65,000
0
0
0
435,458
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
MAINE
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
1 .000-2 , 500
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
6
I
14
12
13
10
41
15
37
o
0
149
NUMBER
0
9
2
5
2
2
9
^
o
o
o
24
TOTAL
360.065
21 t 977
2, 533, 813
1.286,064
2,633,257
1,033, 370
7,553, 705
5,053, 280
1 ,839,089
o
o
22, 314, 62C
INTERCEPTORS
0
o
144, 687
379, 705
225, 540
317, 564
2,873,828
1 ,588, 699
o
o
o
5,530.023
NUMBER
4
o
3
5
1
2
5
o
o
o
0
20
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
o
o
2
o
o
o
o
2
NEW PLANTS
157,625
p
701 .510
742, 183
454,000
583,043
2,617,240
o
o
o
o
5,255,601
OUTFALL
0
o
o
o
o
o
164. 186
o
o
o
c
164,186
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
o
o
1
1
o
o
o
2
NUMBER
i
o
4
o
4
o
1
2
4
o
o
16
LAGOONS
0
Q
o
o
o
o
36. 160
89,490
o
13
o
125,650
MISCELLANEOUS
120,640
o
1 t 212, 272
o
1.378,019
0
31,205
2, 528, 9 74
702,775
0
o
5,973,885
NUMBFR
0
o
Q
o
o
4
1
o
o
o
5
NUMBER
1
1
5
2
£
&
19
7
33
o
o
80
REPL.C ADDS
0
o
0
o
o
977,438
H2,80C
0
o
o
1,090,238
SEWERS
81,800
21,977
475,344
164.176
575, 6**8
132, 763
853.648
733,317
1 . 136,314
o
o
4.175,037
-------
TABLE A-4A
CENSUS
1-368 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
M A I N F
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
t-»
*• 2500-5000
00
5000-10000
13000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
h
6
2
6
1
0
0
0
0
21
# or POPULA-
COMflJN'ITIES TIDN
SFHVED
0
0
0
5
5
2
5
1
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
0
8,275
16,560
3,000
46,220
38,000
0
0
0
0
112,055
TOTAL # OF POPULA- NO. (IF
# 0<= COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI-
PLANTS SFOVED TIES
1
0
0
1
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
10
1
0
0
1
3
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
8
1,200
0
0
soo
10,550
600
?0,500
*00
0
0
0
0
34,450
2
1
6
22
23
16
7
0
1
0
0
0
78
POPULATION
SERVFO
2,900
130
4,300
30,740
65,615
" 82,545
103,760
36,000
70,000
0
0
0
3"6,010
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
CD
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MAINE
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
0
3
9
5
4
4
0
0
0
0
0
25
0
0
4
9
5
*
4
0
0
0
0
0
26
<=
0.5
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1.0
0
0
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
1 N
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u. -ur Y
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
LAni 1 S 1
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
iv ii t r
1.8
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
i-Aieiiux
2.0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
T S=KA 1
2.5
0
0
2
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
Q
iu ui-i
3.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1966 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MAINE
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMH. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
0
3
11
5
4
4
1
0
0
0
0
28
0
0
4
12
5
4
4
1
0
0
0
0
30
0.5
0
0
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1.0
0
0
1
3
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
10
I n
1.2
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
u. ur r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L»H 1 9 1
1.6
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
5
•» at tc
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
VH 1 CUUK
2.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
T S«K«I
2.5
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
1 U ur i
3.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
0
1
0
3
0
3
0
0
3
0
0
1
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
cn
TABLE A-7A
MAINE
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
e
0
0
0
r
c
0
c
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
8
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(J
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
r
0
0
o
c
0
p
0
r
o
n
r
p
c
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
p
0
0
n
0
0
c
r>
-------
TABLE A-8A
MAINE
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SJZE OF PLACE
Unknown
•< B0°
500-1000
1000-2600
2600-5000
EOOO-10000
10000-25000
25006-60000
50000-100000
100000-260000
260000-500000
>>600050
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
19C9
1970
1971
1972
1973 or later
Date not given*
Total Projects
NEW
Primary
1 PLANT
Secondary
Mi
3
21
21
17
7
1
Uk_
7
7
8
10
in
72
nu
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
"rim. to Sec
3
*
h
1
13
1
1
2
9
13
Primary
1
1
1
1
Secondary
1
2
1
1
$
1
1
1
2
*
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfall
1
1
1
1
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Other
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
iiO
••J
2li
28
17
13
2
1
128
1~5T*L M&JICH
ICHlDUltD
ttt VIA*
9
8
8
11
13
8$
13ii
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATfc 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MARYLAND
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
M 1000-2500
cn
CO 2500-5000
5000-100CO
1COOO-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-25000C
250000-500000
>50000C
TOTALS
TOTAL
# UF
PLANTS
1
5
5
11
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
3
31
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
1
5
5
8
2
1
2
1
C
0
0
0
25
45,000
2,975
2,850
10,564
4,570
4,500
26,400
45,000
0
0
0
17,500
159,359
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
2
3
6
2
4
2
1
0
0
0
3
23
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
2
3
6
2
4
2
1
0
0
0
1
21
0
700
2,005
7,760
8,300
23,570
26,400
30,000
0
0
0
1,102,000
1,200,735
0
2
6
8
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
0
590
3,800
14,195
9,730
11,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
39,815
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE CROUP—-1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
MARYLAND
POPULATION SUE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
TOTAL
NUMBER
28
19
45
24
21
37
29
44
542
857
NUMBER
0
7
5
8
7
3
6
17
4
42
105
TOTAL
1.074,183
4,853,210
2,212, 823
7,336, 317
4,617, 540
4,014, 803
4,734,422
8,741, 148
7 ,894,346
9,973, 126
39, 107, 808
94,559, 726
INTERCEPTORS
0
2,048,874
689, 117
1, 152,936
1 ,088,597
790,418
1 ,940.368
3,227, 858
1,465,602
524,122
12,057,589
24,985,481
NUMBER
1
2
2
6
3
1
1
1
I
3
3
24
NUMBER
1
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
a
9
NEW PLANTS
51,900
125,153
316,395
933,472
561 ,489
1,124,571
713,197
256,710
673,818
3,078,012
3,282,792
11,117,509
OUTFALL
63,613
0
0
o
o
o
o
c
o
c
1,464,739
1,528,352
NUMBER
0
4
3
1
1
0
0
1
1
o
1
12
NUMBER
1
5
4
8
4
3
3
6
7
5
17
63
LAGOONS
0
150,265
198, COO
204,422
254,000
0
o
543,596
53,447
0
17,741
1 ,421 ,471
MISCELLANEOUS
16,529
1,206,211
247, 103
1 ,885,737
951, 116
334, 849
1,394,739
1 ,031,430
3,432,910
512,818
3 ,702,937
14,706,379
NUMBER
3
1
2
3
o
0
1
o
1
4
17
NUMBER
13
9
3
19
9
12
27
23
14
31
467
627
REPL.C Anns
165.695
387,480
361,587
777,405
c
838,917
0
353,846
0
1,829,000
504,221
5,218,151
SEWERS
776,446
935,227
400,621
?, 382, 345
1 ,762.338
926.048
686,118
3,327,708
? ,268,569
4,039,174
18,077,789
35.582,383
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CENSUS
P R I MARY
1969 MIJMICIPM- WASTF FNVFNTOPY
MARYLAND
SECONDARY
N 0
PRFLIMTNARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
DLANTS
0
4
5
10
3
1
3
1
0
0
0
1
28
# OF POPULA-
C01MUNITIES TION
SERVFD
0
4
5
9
2
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
25
0
710
7,900
13,694
9,325
6,000
2ft, 400
45,000
0
0
0
77,405
181,434
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
1
20
11
16
4
7
2
3
0
0
0
2
66
* OF
CnPMIJNIT
1
1ft
11
16
4
7
2
3
0
0
0
1
61
POPULA- NO. OF
IF.S TICN CDMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
45,000
58,025
7,980
22.550
14,700
43,945
26,400
82.000
0
0
0
1 .101,000
1.401,600
0
0
4
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
2,200
4,375
2,100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
fl.675
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRFLIMINARY
cn
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MARYLAND
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<"500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>5 00000
TOTALS
0
20
16
26
11
5
4
6
0
0
0
1
89
0
20
17
27
11
5
4
6
1
0
0
1
92
O
0.5
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
\ T(
1.2
0
2
1
2
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
8
lu. ur r
1.4
0
4
3
5
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
15
•u»™ i a i
1.6
0
4
3
4
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
17
n site
1.8
0
2
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
v« i cuun
2.0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
2
I
0
0
0
7
T S*KM 1
2.5
0
1
0
4
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
9
lu ur i
3.0
0
1
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
3.5
0
0
3
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
5
4.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
>4.0
0
1
6
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
cn
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MARYLAND
INDICATED LOADING / D1MESTIC LOADING KATIQ
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
20
16
26
11
5
4
6
0
0
0
1
89
0
20
17
27
11
5
4
6
1
0
0
1
92
<=
0.5
0
2
2
4
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
10
1.0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
»n
1.2
0
2
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
iu. ur i
1.4
0
4
2
4
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
'iMn i a i
1.6
0
4
3
3
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
16
IN 3 1 tC
i.a
0
2
i
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
CH 1 rULJK
2.0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
6
I ^.= KAI
2.5
0
1
0
4
I
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
8
lu ur i
3.0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3.5
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
4
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
I
>4.0
D
1
6
*
2
3
0
3
3
0
3
0
13
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
cn
OO
MARYLAND
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500
500 - 999
1000 - 4999
5000 - 9999
10000 - 24999
25000 - 49999
5000C - 99999
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
1*
2*
3*
4*
5*
6*
7*
8*
9*
0*
1
• *
1
0
1
0
1800
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
900
2
*
0
c
c
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
3
0
2
1
11500
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
900
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
1
0
I
0
16400
0
0
c
0
0
0
c
0
c
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
e
*
1
0
0
t
1100000
51
3
5
19
8
10
3
3
0
0
0
517647
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
4
2
0
53
4
6
19
8
10
3
3
0
0
0
0
o
0
2570P
1104000
1129700
0
2075
4680
42061
52170
121406
75575
221480
0
0
0
519447
-------
TABLE A-8A
MARTLAND/rjC
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
Unknown
< 500
600-1000
1000-2500
2600-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-Tooboo
100000-250000
250000-500000
^500000
Total
_ INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oMaler
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
1
$
1
2
1
2
1
17
17
17
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
"rim. to Sec.
1
h
2
6
2
2
1
18
18
18
Primary
1
1
2
2
2
Secondary
3
3
9
2
1
2
1
1
22
22
22
INTERCEPTORS
1
2
2
ii
1
2
2
"1-Jl
111
Hi
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
1
2
2
1
1
1
8
8
8
Outfall
1
1
1
1
Interception
1
1
1
1
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Othe
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
^
10
15
26
7
3 .
10
i
i
2
78
TOT ML fftO-nCTl
SCHEDULED
PER TEAR
83
83
tn
CD
-------
RUN DATE 66/12/17
1960 CENSUS
P R I M A R Y
TABLE A-2A
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MASSACHUSETTS
SECONDARY
PRELIMINARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
0 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
1COOOO-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
0
0
1
3
3
10
2
1
2
0
0
23
* OF POPULA-
COMMUN1T1ES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
C
0
I
2
3
10
2
1
1
0
0
20
7T8t730
0
0
450
2,400
4,980
115,660
42,445
95,000
166,000
0
0
1,205,665
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
1
2
3
6
8
10
16
3
2
1
0
0
52
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI-
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES
1
2
2
6
7
9
15
3
2
1
0
0
48
800
425
1,900
7,400
14,890
33,920
118,670
76,750
118,000
170,000
0
0
542,755
Z
0
2
12
7
13
12
3
5
1
0
1
58
POPULATION
SEKVEU
825,425
200
250
9,690
15,340
36,145
105,740
74,300
360,985
100,260
0
355,400
1,883,735
-------
TA0UB A-1A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
MASSACHUSETTS
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
15
ft
7
25
20
53
279
137
128
32
55
757
NUMBER
0
o
2
3
2
4
27
13
20
3
4
78
TOTAL
384,252
82,991
1,038, 854
2, 171, 917
2,097.807
6,349,289
34,410,089
18,915,625
25.636,690
3,593, 201
29,788,752
124, 469,467
INTERCEPTORS
0
0
369,047
598,237
1,062, 540
354, 746
6,411, 880
2, 198,020
8,914,540
183,972
5,997,602
26,090,584
NUMBER
4
o
4
1
2
4
o
3
0
o
19
NUMBER
1
0
o
o
o
o
2
1
o
o
o
4
NEW PLANTS
103,658
c
47? ,424
820, 809
201,641
' 1,307,710
3,259,411
o
5,965,973
o
o
12, 131 ,626
OUTFALL
30.0CO
0
0
0
c
c
172,726
45 ,380
o
0
c
248.106
NUMBER
2
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
•J
NUMBER
1
I
1
I
5
15
5
2
0
38
LAGOONS
43.810
o
42 , 000
o
o
o
Q
o
o
o
o
85 , 810
MISCELLANEOUS
25,021
20,460
9.489
36,075
21 ,800
I ,059,794
2,360.918
373,500
1 , 125.059
419.059
o
5,451,175
NUMBER
3
0
o
o
I
5
12
3
f)
34
NUMBER
4
5
17
15
37
219
114
96
27
45
581
REPL.C ADOS
75,140
0
o
188,735
825,145
3, 5Q2, 849
1 ,772,700
21,256
18, 225,483
? 4 . 7fi 1 . 1 D R
SEWERS
106,623
62,531
145, 894
716,796
623,091
2 , 8
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CENSUS
P t. I M A R Y
19ft8 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
MASSACHUSETTS
SFCONOAOY
PRELIMINAPY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
£J 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
1
4
7
12
2
2
2
0
0
30
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITtES TtnN
SFRVFO
0
0
0
1
2
5
11
2
2
1
0
0
24
0
0
0
450
3,880
?13,115
128,455
44,400
147,500
166,000
0
0
1 ,303,800
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
1
0
0
4
11
13
21
3
?
1
0
0
56
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI-
SF"VED TIFS
1
0
0
4
10
12
10
•j
2
1
0
0
52
800
0
0
4,100
16,040
42,514
127,900
S4.100
112,000
170,000
0
0
557,454
I
0
2
17
12
13
13
3
4
1
0
1
67
POPULATION
SERVED
112,000
0
250
19,020
36,435
776,135
121,115
74,300
310,485
100,260
0
355,400
1,905,400
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
u>
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
MASSACHUSETTS
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
5
6
5
8
11
15
3
4
2
0
0
59
0
6
7
6
8
11
16
3
4
2
0
1
64
0.5
0
0
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
1.0
0
1
1
0
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
8
i n
1.2
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
5
1 1 j • u r r
0
0
2
1
0
3
4
1
0
0
0
0
11
1. Mil 1.0 1
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
it o i u r:
1.8
0
I
C
0
2
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
7
V*« 1 CV»'.J
2.0
0
0
0
0
3
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
5
r\ i v ~ f\n I
2.5
C
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
1
-I.
C
0
0
4
3.0
0
0
0
1
0
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
7
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
>4.0
0
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
5
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
cn
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
MASSACHUSETTS
INDICATED LOADIN3 / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
6
9
8
14
12
16
3
4
2
0
0
74
0
8
10
9
14
12
17
3
4
2
0
1
80
0.5
0
1
3
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
10
1.0
0
5
4
2
4
5
5
1
0
0
0
0
26
\ n
1.2
0
0
0
0
2
1
6
1
0
0
0
0
10
u. ur Y
1.4
0
0
2
1
3
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
9
LAND 1
1.6
0
0
0
1
2
0
2
1
2
0
0
1
9
N Si£t
1.8
0
0
0
0
2
3
1
0
0
1
0
0
7
IAI tbUK
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T <.*««!
2.5
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
5
1U Ul-l
3.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
D
0
0
0
2
-------
TABLE A-7A
MASSACHUSETTS
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
TOTALS
CflM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8+
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
c
c
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
I
c
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1025
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
c
0
0
0
0
c
0
n
0
0
c
c
0
0
0
0
c
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
3
2
0
1
221000
4
0
0
0
I
2
1
0
0
0
0
32110
8
*
6
3
2
1
2024415
49
0
0
2
0
19
18
8
1
1
0
1656420
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
o
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
5
2
2
0
54
0
o
2
2
21
19
B
1
1
0
n
0
1091685
928730
225000
2245415
0
C
0
3165
7460
230C30
515385
545935
107535
280045
0
1689555
-------
TABLE A-8A
MASSACHUSETTS
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
eiyt nt Pi ATP
Unknown
*^ 600
600-1000
1000-2600
2600-5000
EOOO-10000
10000-26000
26000-60000
ebobo-looooo
100000-260000
260000-600000
^600000
Total
JNDICATlB
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
"1971
1972
1973 or'later
Date riot given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
1
2
1
k
3
1
1
1
11*
1
8
k
1
14
Secondary
1
1
6
2
6
lli
*
3
1
i
Uo
7
17
7
7
2
liO
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
2
2
5
1
2
12
2
3
1
6
12
Primary
1
1
1
1
Secondary
6
1
2
1
1
11
1
2
2
3
3
11
INTERCEPTORS
1
1
2
3
1
2
10
3
2
2
1
1
1
10
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfall
Interception
1
1
2
2
2
Plant
1
1
1
1
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Other
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
h
1
7
11
12
27
10
5
3
l
81
TOTAL PNOACn
ICHEDOLEO
2
111
25
12
20
16
2
91
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN OATb 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MICHIGAN
PRIMARY SECONOAKY
M 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
< = 50C
50C-1COO
100D-26GO
2500-50CO
5COO-10000
10GOO-250CO
2500Q-50C03
50000-100000
100COO-2 50000
25COOO-5COOOO
>500COO
TOTALS
TOTAL
PLANTS
2
4
a
33
24
21
13
I
3
1
0
1
112
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
1
*
6
31
23
2C
13
2
3
1
C
1
107
233,500
1,125
6,315
56,835
85,350
142,670
194,105
101,000
225,200
210,000
0
3,667,000
4,923,100
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
3
2
8
31
24
8
12
5
4
2
0
0
99
H OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SEKVEO
3
2
8
30
23
7
8
3
4
2
C
0
90
41,130
800
5,120
51,615
75,305
' 53,420
187,065
129,100
305,700
331,000
0
0
1,180,255
0
0
2
13
6
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
0
0
1,810
13.910
24,875
26,610
0
0
0
0
0
C
67,205
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 196? CONTRACT AWARDS
MICHIGAN
«>
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 58
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 1
TOTAL
3.841,985
853. 923
3,772, 133
18.627.073
11.911. 797
28,868.874
32.652.022
39(284.106
30,493,987
24.733.383
45, 151,499
240. 190*782
INTERCEPTORS
47,500
0
16. 610
996.633
615,340
4,855. 192
1,082,285
662, 618
1 ,399,875
2, 142,198
29,850,469
41,688,920
NUMBER
8
o
4
10
4
9
3
2
1
4
46
NUMBER
1
0
1
o
1
o
o
o
o
o
1
4
NEW PLANTS
456,754
o
407,611
2,134,867
868,488
4,853,517
1,610,187
5,757,980
429,300
69,848
2,043 ,649
18,632,201
OUTFALL
90,000
o
11 ,900
0
52 ,004
0
c
o
o
o
495,000
648,904
NUMBER
3
2
9
21
3
I
1
0
o
0
41
NUMBER
0
2
5
10
6
5
14
3
2
g
1
56
LAGOONS
90,387
161,950
598,993
2,410, 137
377,397
37,876
106,000
22,470
o
o
0
3,805,210
MISCELLANEOUS
0
82,102
316,355
871,934
1 ,264,622
1,137,787
1,066,216
3,090,324
173,811
2,859,99?
115,001
10,978,144
NUMBER
7
o
1
g
5
4
5
8
13
3
17
76
NUMBER
38
10
13
59
57
116
191
170
102
179
35
970
REPL.t ADOS
576,596
o
94.700
1 ,087,442
1 ,164,088
1 ,545.982
1,133,095
10 ,726,894
B,1B9,544
8,355, 111
4,532,718
37,406,170
SEWERS
2,580.748
609,871
2.325.964
11 .126.060
7.569.858
16.438.520
27.654.239
19.003(620
20,301.457
11.3C6.234
8 .114.662
127,031.233
-------
TABLE A-4A
cr>
CENSUS
196P MUNICIPAL WASTE INVFNTQRY
MICHIGAN
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
1000-?500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
2
5
11
35
24
1"
16
7
7.
1
0
1
113
* OF POPULA-
rtMMUNITIgS TION
SE1VFO
1
f.
11
32
23
1°
15
2
7
1
0
1
112
326,530
1 ,350
",000
5*, 240
85,460
121 ,800
233,115
101,000
160,600
220,000
0
3,667,000
4, "83, 005
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
1
3
12
5?
28
14
11
10
5
2
0
0
138
* OF PDPULA- NO. Or
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIPS SEPVFO
1
3
12
51
27
14
o
5
5
2
0
n
129
15,000
1,150
8,o60
80,555
96.050
95,=70
2?4,935
266.00Q
455.850
376.000
0
0
1 ,61?, 360
0
7
'0
16
8
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
5ft
0
2,975
15,340
21,535
'4,! 05
30,175
?5,270
0
0
0
0
0
129,400
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MICHIGAN
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
O500
5 00- 1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000*
TOTALS
0
9
27
66
48
28
22
4
7
4
0
0
215
0
9
28
66
48
28
22
4
7
4
0
0
216
<-
0.5
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1.0
0
0
4
12
4
2
3
1
0
0
0
0.
26
l r
1.2
0
0
8
5
7
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
25
«u. ur t
1.4
0
2
1
11
7
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
24
•L»NI5 1
1.6
0
1
1
10
6
4
2
0
1
0
0
0
25
in 5 lit
1.8
0
2
2
5
2
6
2
0
0
1
0
0
20
LAI tliUP
2.0
0
1
2
7
4
3
2
1
0
1
0
0
21
(T *«KAI
2.5
0
1
3
4
5
4
3
1
1
0
0
0
22
1U Ul-l
3.0
0
0
1
2
7
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
15
3.5
0
0
1
5
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
11
4.0
0
0
?
1
0
3
0
0
2
1
0
0
10
>4.0
C
?
\
4
1
2
7
0
1
0
0
0
13
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MICHIGAN
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING 3ATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
10
33
78
53
31
26
6
6
6
0
1
252
0
10
35
78
53
32
26
6
8
6
1
1
256
<«
0.5
0
4
7
9
8
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
31
1.0
0
0
8
25
20
11
6
2
2
0
0
0
74
1 P
1.2
0
3
8
15
7
3
3
0
0
1
0
0
40
iu* \j* r
1.4
0
0
0
3
3
3
6
1
0
2
1
0
19
"U«n I •> J
1.6
0
0
3
9
4
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
23
1 11 J 1 4.3
*_ *J»_.
0
2
2
2
3
1
1
0
3
3
0
3
8
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
SERVING COHM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500
500 - 999
1000 - 4999
5000 - 9999
10000 - 24999
25000 - 49999
50000 - 99999
10COOO - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE
POPULATION SERVED
TABLE A-7A
MICHIGAN
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
I*
2*
3*
4*
5*
6*
T*
8*
9*
0*
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
1
0
0
1
1130
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1130
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
3
0
2
1
T7370
4
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
39870
6
*
1
0
I
0
46000
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2570
7
*
1
0
1
0
107COO
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
9COO
B
*
4
0
3
1
4292000
60
0
0
8
9
17
17
ft
1
0
0
1418795
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
0
7
3
0
67
0
0
1C
11
20
17
8
1
0
0
0
0
c
4277870
24563C
452350C
C
0
0
26170
74500
282555
526200
449935
112005
0
0
1471365
-------
TABLE A-8A
MICHIGAN
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
•< BOO
Ron mon
1000-2500
2505-5000
EOOO-10000
10000-26000
25000-50000
50000-TOOOOO
100000-260000
2finnno Knnnon
^•600000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oMater
Date riot given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
1
1
2
h
k
k
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec.
3
1
1
1
1
1
8
2
6
8
Primary
1
1
1
1
Secondary
1
1
2
1
1
2
INTERCEPTORS
1
1
2
2
2
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
2
1
2
1
6
$
1
6
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
3ther
NUMBER OF
CQMMUNiTIES
*
2
6
1
1
3
1
1
20
TOTAL MOJICT1
SCHEDULED
PER MAI
7
7
1
7
23
CO
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MINNESOTA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
O50C
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25COO
25000-50000
50000-100000
1COOOO-2 50000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
3
28
Id
21
5
4
2
0
0
4
0
0
65
» OF POPULA-
COMMUNITItS TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
3
27
18
21
5
4
2
0
0
1
0
0
til
825
1,048,840
Ilt740
27,930
14,280
28,340
43,830
0
0
139,600
0
0
1,315,385
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
40
62
88
32
20
14
3
0
0
0
0
259
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
40
62
87
32
20
14
3
0
0
0
0
258
0
10,955
41,450
127,525
93,550
125,980
190,710
92,160
0
0
0
0
682,330
0
20
25
9
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
60
0
6,040
16,390
13,920
9,010
19,520
0
0
c
0
0
0
64,680
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
MINNESOTA
"""•J *•"—••'
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 9
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 0
TOTAL
188.284
3,946,397
8,657,637
10,283. 793
12,601 ,240
26,499, 827
20,078, 784
4,459,319
1,413, 734
23,857,485
112,881 ,244
INTERCEPTORS
0
31, 595
596,424
1 ,118, 847
1,293, 862
4,943, 583
3,386, 916
0
o
244,319
9,500
11,625,046
NUMBER
1
7
18
11
11
3
1
0
0
o
o
52
NUMBER
0
1
2
2
2
2
0
o
0
o
o
9
NEW PLANTS
28,800
445,960
2,727,864
2,333,477
2,626,917
1,220,041
53,927
0
o
o
o
9,436,986
OUTFALL
0
4,984
75,650
83,607
53,693
272,455
0
o
o
o
c
490,389
NUMBER
0
18
16
16
1
5
1
0
0
o
o
57
NUMBER
0 -
12
11
16
3
5
8
2
0
0
0
57
LAGOONS
0
765,776
958,892
1 ,249,978
59,271
875,988
129,510
0
0
o
o
4,039,415
MISCELLANEOUS
0
794,383
749,418
1,087,420
491 ,426
1,149,233
953,401
61,056
0
0
0
5,186,337
NUMBER
1
5
7
8
6
8
4
1
0
1
9
50
NUMBER
7
24
27
46
51
80
108
21
5
16
28
413
REPL.C ADDS
36,650
283,417
673,080
847,801
1 ,112,975
2,851, 523
1.813,042
2.234.189
0
5,478
20,241, 1 91
30.099,346
SEWERS
122,834
1,620.282
2 .876,309
3,562,663
6,963,096
15,187,004
13,841,988
?, 164,074
894,744
1 ,163,937
3,606,794
52,003,725
-------
TABLE A-4A
cn
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1963 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MINNESOTA
SfCONOAPY
N P
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
25
15
14
*
5
2
0
0
4
0
0
71
* OF POPULA-
CDIMiJNITIES TION
SERVED
0
25
15
14
6
5
?
0
0
1
0
0
68
0
6,470
S,*60
10.3PO
IB, 770
34,flflO
49,170
0
0
135,600
0
0
275,630
TOTAL * OF POPULA- NO. DF
* OF COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
PLANTS SERVED TIES SERVED
0 0
7? 71
90 90
103 10?
37 17
23 2?
13 13
3 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
341 340
0
1,12?, 960
60,460
152,690
104,650
145,785
178.310
06,130
0
0
0
0
1,860,985
0
15
13
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31
0
4, BOO
8,530
3,960
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17,290
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MINNESOTA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
93
108
115
30
26
13
4
0
1
0
1
391
0
94
108
115
31
27
13
4
0
1
0
1
39*
<»
0.5
0
2
1
4
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
10
1.0
0
11
16
19
3
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
56
i r
1.2
0
9
8
12
5
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
41
*U« II r 1
*•*
0
18
12
11
4
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
49
•LAINIS 1
1.6
0
9
15
11
1
4
2
0
0
1
0
0
43
in a lit
1.8
0
4
12
12
3
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
34
(.A 1 tbUf
2.0
0
7
11
11
4
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
36
4.0
0
7
6
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
17
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
CD
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MINNESOTA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS 114 SIZE CATEGORY- <«RATIO OP)
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<*500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
93
106
115
30
26
13
4
0
1
0
1
391
0
94
ioa
115
31
27
13
4
0
1
0
1
394
<-
0.5
0
2
4
4
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
15
1.0
0
12
17
22
5
7
1
0
0
0
0
0
64
1.2
0
9
7
12
4
5
3
1
0
0
0
0
41
1.4
0
17
11
10
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
44
1.6
0
9
14
10
1
3
1
0
0
1
0
0
39
1.8
0
4
12
12
3
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
34
2.0
0
7
12
11
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
36
0
15
12
17
6
3
1
2
0
0
0
0
56
0
7
6
9
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
26
0
2
3
8
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
0
3
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
>4.0
0
7
'6
3
2
1
1
0
3
0
3
3
17
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRFLIMINARY
MINNESOTA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVER
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
IOOOCO - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
750
1
0
1
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
700
3
*
2
0
0
2
21BO
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1730
4
*
1
0
0
1
5150
I
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
5
*
1
0
c
I
2C640
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
* 1890
6
*
2
0
0
2
55560
2.
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3970
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
2
0
2
0
1166700
28
0
1
6
5
10
3
1
0
2
0
1067400
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
2
7
c
35
1
3
10
5
10
3
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
116670C
84280
125098f
0
340
177C
21580
25940
161360
1C2900
4545^
C
716650
0
1075990
-------
TABLE A-8A
MINNESOTA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
< *oo_
500-1000
1000-2600
2600-6000
BOOO-IOOOp
10000-26000
26005r6000p
Bbobb-Tooooo
100000-260000
260000-500000
>600000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 or'laler
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW
Primary
.•' «•
/ PLANT
Secondary
m 1
3
3
2
9
1
6
2
9
EXPANSKDN/UPGRADNG/RJ PLACEMENT
Prim, to Sac.
Primary
1
1
2
li
h
h
Secondary
3
1
li
3
1
2
1
1$
11
h
15
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
3
S
lli
19
12
*
1
3
2
2
66
1
65
66
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Dther
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
It
12
18
26
17
6
3
3
i
1
91
ToUi tuoJWtl
ICHIOULEO
FCN VIA!
1
22
71
9U
-------
TABLE A-2A
CO
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MISSISSIPPI
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
2
7
20
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
35
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
2
6
19
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
500
2,600
20,350
5,900
11,100
0
0
0
0
0
0
40,450
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
2
5
37
15
14
8
3
0
0
0
0
84
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
2
4
24
11
10
6
3
0
0
0
0
60
0
550
2,801
37,200
29,915
63,660
71,400
108,000
0
0
0
0
313,526
0
3
9
9
10
7
4
4
0
1
0
0
47
0
700
3,670
9,700
25,810
41,100
81,500
123,000
0
140,000
0
C
425,480
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
MISSISSIPPI
CD
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
20
7
33
44
23
48
33
18
o
22
0
248
NUMBER
1
2
2
2
t.
3
3
o
2
0
25
TOTAL
2,604,055
383.879
2. 137. 161
3,675, 720
3,776, 855
6,883, 733
5,843, 129
3,499,678
o
5,281,232
0
34,085,442
INTERCEPTORS
17,940
70.946
33,881
160. 588
2, ISC, 748
1 ,341 ,302
746,981
191,053
o
484,315
o
5,197,754
NUMBER
3
o
o
o
2
1
I
o
o
2
o
9
NUMBER
1
o
1
1
o
I
1
o
o
1
o
6
NEW PLANTS
587,628
o
o
544,200
581 ,200
735,136
o
o
1,014 ,064
o
3,462 ,228
OUTFALL
9,280
0
93,973
32 .457
0
49 .878
97.769
o
153.187
o
436.544
NUMBER
2
13
16
10
4
3
o
1
0
56
NUMBER
2
2
6
10
4
10
5
7
o
1
o
47
LAGCONS
59,592
16,124
537,941
1 .M5.582
234, 737
1 ,820,953
1,580,734
181, 722
o
543,739
o
6,491 , 126
MISCELLANEOUS
137.610
140,316
345,475
1 ,233,187
341 ,285
1 ,944, 579
683,774
2,852, l°6
o
237,769
o
7.916,191
NUMBER
2
o
o
o
2
o
o
o
o
5
NUMBER
9
2
10
15
7
18
17
7
o
15
Q
100
REPL.t ADOS
67,833
o
71.641
o
o
595,177
o
o
(1
o
734.601
SEWERS
1,724,172
156,493
1 ,054,248
733,906
505,885
1 ,145,821
1 ,403,608
274.707
o
2,848,158
o
9.846.998
-------
1960 CENSUS
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
MISSISSIPPI
PIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
CO 5000-10000
CO
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>5 00000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
>
5
'
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
0
2
*
8
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
0
300
2,500
0,000
5,000
S.500
0
0
0
0
0
0
25,300
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
9
31
72
26
2fl
20
7
0
2
0
0
!95
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TIDN COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
0
8
?6
45
17
17
7
5
0
1
0
0
126
0
2,740
19,796
75,635
60,?65
128, 9B4
207,900
0
30.000
0
0
669,977
0
5
7
7
7
1
3
2
0
0
0
0
3?
0
1,150
3,500
9,500
20,170
6,000
49,000
75,000
0
130,000
0
0
294,320
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MISSISSIPPI
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
M
CD
•c-
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
1
7
10
6
8
2
3
1
0
0
0
38
0
3
9
10
7
9
3
3
1
0
0
0
45
<"
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
3
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
e
i n
1.2
0
0
1
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
U. UP f
1.4
0
0
0
0
3
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
L un i a i
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
n a if. c
1.8
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
lAI CbUK
2.0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
T ^«K« I
2.5
0
1
2
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
lu uri
3.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.0
0
2
?
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
MISSISSIPPI
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING ?ATIO
PRELIMINARY
-——--«- \ INU. ur KLAM5 11^ 3l£f LA 1 Ct»U* T «,"KHIIU UM
COMM. NO. OF <*
SftVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
l_t 5000-10000
CO
01 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
20
39
47
17
18
5
4
1
0
0
0
151
0
31)
57
59
19
19
8
4
1
0
0
0
206
0.5
0
39
56
57
18
17
6
2
0
0
0
0
195
1.0
0
0
1
I
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
7
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
1.4
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 -
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.0
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
t.o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
3
0
3
3
3
0
0
3
0
3
0
3
0
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
MISSISSIPPI
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
CO 500 - 999 2*
cn
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 B*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
f!
0
c
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
c
0
0
c
0
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 6B/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MISSOURI
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
j_, 1000-2500
CO
-j 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-10COOO
100000-250000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
7
5
4
5
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
24
# OF POPULA-
CUMMUNITIES . TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
1
3
2
4
0
1
c
0
0
0
0
11
0
1,535
4,315
3,650
14,700
0
31,200
0
46,000
0
0
0
101,400
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
3
65
55
112
63
38
36
7
4
0
2
0
3B5
» OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI-
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES
3
22
40
81
42
23
12
2
2
0
0
0
227
27,875
11,585
29,155
123,520
138,300
149,885
158,170
70,800
111,500
0
9, 500
0
630,290
1
1
2
10
3
6
2
1
1
0
1
1
29
POPULATION
SERVEU
13,000
5,48J>
6,620
29,935
30,135
90,300
142,845
91,9*5
110,150
0
449,000
750,000
1,719,4U5
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
MISSOURI
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
M POPULATION SIZE GROUP
CO
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
19
41
72
96
68
74
91
51
91
1
241
845
NUMBER
0
I
f,
9
5
•j
7
3
1
o
37
72
TOTAL
461,229
1 ,533.967
3,900»099
6,609. 004
3 t 272 i 090
9, 802 1 806
It i848t 172
5,513, 466
9,268,469
7,900
107,077,425
I58t 294? 649
INTERCEPTORS
0
5,095
124,745
1,435,914
326,651
788,623
2,255,466
2,040,548
310, 763
o
30,967, 172
38.254,977
NUMBER
1
o
2
1
1
3
if
o
\
o
9
24
NUMBER
0
2
0
j,
2
0
1
0
o
o
3
9
NEW PLANTS
11.690
o
116,896
140.000
69.009
2.542,058
2.853.405
o
135.502
o
34,102 .980
39.971 .540
OUTFALL
0
21 .650
c
74.706
154,602
o
32.790
0
o
o
2,217.730
2,501.478
NUMBER
4
15
26
21
8
5
o
1
2
o
4
86
NUMBER
1
1,
11
14
5
11
3
3
4
o
15
71
LAGOONS
49,845
278,908
997,775
978,423
633, 845
445,725
o
90,373
90,277
o
711,197
4,276,368
MISCELLANEOUS
6,025
78.009
276,630
866,874
450,900
1,229,639
416,955
385,770
3,533,173
o
16,460,326
23,724,301
NUMBER
0
1
o
3
0
0
9
2
2
o
8
24
NUMBER
13
18
27
47
47
50
68
42
81
1
165
559
REPL.G ADOS
0
8,300
o
99.215
o
o
2.167,053
11 5,100
257.912
o
9.480.960
12, 148,540
SEWERS
393.669
1 .142.005
2,384,053
2,993,872
1 ,637,083
3,796,761
4,102,503
2,881.697
4,940,842
7,900
13,137,060
37.417,445
-------
I960 CENSUS
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
MISSOURI
PRIMARY SECONDARY
PRELIMINARY
NO TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
7
4
4
4
3
4
0
2
0
3
0
31
# OF POPULA-
COMKUNITIES TION
SERVED
0
1
2
2
3
3
3
0
1
0
1
0
16
0
1,535
3,675
3,650
12,200
23,500
80,200
0
128,900
0
569,000
0
822,660
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
83
77
133
6°
41
35
9
0
0
0
2
459
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
1
3*
59
94
45
25
12
2
*
0
0
1
279
27,200
22,720
41,350
14fl,440
157,760
176, ?85
166,985
122,000
134,600
0
0
110,000
1,107,440
0
0
1
8
?
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
0
4,R50
6,025
27,675
23,9«5
58,100
106,845
91,965
51,250
0
0
0
370,695
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MISSOURI
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMN. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
M
CO
0
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50COO-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
51
52
85
37
17
12
3
3
2
1
0
263
0
92
73
105
56
21
13
4
4
2
1
0
371
<•
0.5
0
1
2
1
3
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
9
1.0
0
11
4
8
6
1
4
1
1
0
0
0
36
I r
1.2
0
7
8
3
9
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
31
«u. ur c
1.4
0
a
9
15
10
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
51
•LAN) » 1
1.6
0
8
15
16
9
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
54
IN iliC
1.8
0
6
11
8
8
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
35
IAI CbU»
2.0
0
16
2
15
5
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
41
4.0
0
13
5
6
0
2
0
I
0
0
0
0
27
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MISSOURI
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
O500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-50.0000
>500000
TOTALS
0
56
55
85
39
20
13
3
3
2
1
0
277
0
103
77
105
58
25
14
4
4
2
1
0
393
< =
0.5
0
19
15
13
13
3
3
1
1
0
0
0
68
1.0
0
33
24
39
22
9
8
2
2
0
0
0
139
i r
1.2
0
8
5
3
4
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
24
«u« ur t
1.4
0
6
4
8
8
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
30
•LAIN 1 i ]
1.6
0
6
9
7
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
26
,n 3 i tc
1.4
0
5
3
5
3
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
19
W* i cuur
2,0
0
11
1
6
1
2
P
0
0
1
0
0
22
\ r X»»VM i
2.5
0
2
7
10
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
20
i i \J ur i
3.0
0
1
2
5
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
3.5
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
4.0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
>4.0
3
}
6
5
1
1
1
0
3
9
3
3
23
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
TABU A-7A
MISSOURI
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 ANO ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
2
0
0
2
6765
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
585
5
*
2
0
0
2
15240
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
c
0
0
c
3115
6
*
2
0
1
1
73200
3
0
0
1
1
1
0
n
0
0
0
32605
7
*
0
r>
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2600
8
3
3
o
0
1100COO
3
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
8170
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
9
9
3
1
5
0
11
1
1
6
2
1
0
o
n
c
n
0
ft
110000P
46000
49205
1195205
0
85
500
12585
11140
22765
0
0
0
n
0
47075
-------
TABLE A-8A
MISSOURI
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE Or PLAUt
Unknown
^C 6°JL
500-1000
1000-7500
2500-5000
SOOO-10COO
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
^•500000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oF'later
Date riot given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
Secondary
1
ll
1
1
2
0
$
1
3
9
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
1
1
1
1
Primary
Secondary
1
1
1
1
INTERCEPTORS
ll
1
$
1.
k
5
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Dther
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES.
1
1
$
3
1
2
1
1
1
16
(MAI. M6JIW1
SCHEDULED
PEft VIA!
fcv
3
8
19
CO
CO
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MONTANA
SECONDARY
N 0
TKtATMtNT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1COO-2500
2500-5000
5000-1000C
10COO-25000
25000-50000
5000C-100000
1COCOO-250000
250000-500000
>50COOO
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
1
1C
J
a
2
i
5
2
2
C
C
0
35
t OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES T10N
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
1
1C
3
8
2
2
5
2
2
0
0
0
35
350
2,590
1,990
9,070
8,300
13,900
71,000
50,000
111,000
0
0
o
268,200
TOTAL
It OF
PLANTS
1
18
21
19
10
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
72
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMHUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
1
18
20
19
10
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
71
1,000
4,860
15,770
31,280
35,000
20,810
0
0
0
0
0
0
108,720
0
1
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
t
450
850
4,700
2,300
0
0
0
0
0
u
0
a, 300
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
MONTANA
cn
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
5
15
10
18
6
5
11
6
34
0
0
110
TOTAL
205,051
723,627
665,519
1,089,637
308.680
362,107
811,257
4,557,307
2.513,236
0
0
11,236,421
NUMBER
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
4
NEW PLANTS
0
105,212
0
0
c
219,010
0
954,328
6,237
0
0
1,284,787
NUMBER
0
4
3
7
0
1
0
0
0
0
c
15
LAGOONS
0
73,829
62,535
309,419
0
52,074
0
0
0
0
0
497.857
NUMBER RFPL.t ADDS
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
5
9.282
0
40.325
0
0
0
3.960
C
338, 551
0
0
392.118
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
TOTAL
NUMBER
0
0
0
3
2
0
0
3
2
0
0
10
INTERCEPTORS
0
0
0
238,055
45.869
0
0
2,353.113
598,120
0
0
3,235,157
NUMBER
1
1
0
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
6
OUTFALL
2C.986
49.532
0
31.516
0
76.13C
159,715
C
0
C
C
337,879
NUMBER
0
5
4
4
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
17
MISCELLANEOUS
0
159,893
501,787
328,917
214, C82
14,893
0
0
8,336
0
0
1,227,908
NUMBER
3
4
2
3
2
0
9
2 I.
28 1.
0
0
53 4,
SEWERS
174,783
335,161
60,872
181.730
48,729
0
647.582
249,866
561.992
0
C
260.71-5
-------
TABLE A-4A
CO
1960 CENSUS
P R 1 M & R V
l500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
0
9
i
i
2
?
*
1
2
0
0
0
22
H OF POPUL4-
COMMUNITIFS TITN
SERVED
0
3
1
1
2
2
4
1
2
0
0
0
22
0
2,500
700
1,200
7,600
15,600
5R.200
22,000
132,000
0
0
0
240,000
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
1
10
2?
29
11
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
10?
* OF PPPULA- NO. OF
C01MUMT1F.S T10N COMMIJNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
1
30
27
?B
11
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
101
l.'SOO
fl,270
15,160
45,?50
40,200
25,100
12,000
0
0
0
0
0
150,480
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
600
0
0
0
4,600
0
0
0
0
5,200
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MONTANA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO, OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGORY <«RATIO OF)
PRELIMINARY
COHM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
39
24
27
9
8
5
0
2
0
0
0
114
0
40
24
27
9
8
5
0
2
0
0
0
i 115
0.5
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1.0
0
6
2
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
1.2
0
0
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1.4
0
5
2
3
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
1.6
0
4
4
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
1.8
0
2
3
*
0
1
C
0
0
0
0
0
12
2.0
0
4
5
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
11
2.5
0
4
0
4
1
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
13
3.0
0
6
3
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
3.5
0
6
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
2
>4.0
0
2
3
3
0
1
C
0
0
0
0
0
9
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
CO
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MONTANA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COM*. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
43
26
27
11
8
5
0
2
0
0
0
122
0
44
26
27
11
8
5
0
2
0
0
0
123
0.5
0
9
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16
1.0
0
31
14
12
7
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
69
I n
1.2
0
0
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
u. ur r
1.4
0
0
0
6
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
LM"I 1 a 1
1.6
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
5
n| 91 tC
1.8
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
UM 1 CUUK
2.0
0
1
2
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
6
I VHttl
2.5
0
0
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
i u ur r
3.0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
>4.3
0
2
1
2
1
1
0
3
0
3
0
0
7
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
TABLE A-7A
MONTANA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
<-0 BELOW 500 1*
(13
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
c
0
0
0
0
n
3
*
1
0
1
0
1000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 /
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
fl
c
p
6
*
1
0
1
0
35000
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
64CO
7
1
0
1
0
56COO
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
zcco
8
*
0
0
0
n
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
c
3
0
c
4
p
0
4
c
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
p
92000
0
92000
0
0
o
84CO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8400
-------
TABLE A-8A
MONTANA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
S.IZE OF PLACE
Unknown
^^ BOO
500-1000
1000-J500
2600-6000
EOQO-10000
10000-25000
2600pr60pOp
soodb-ldoboo
100000-260000
260000-6GOOOO
^•600060
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oMater
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
1
1
1
1
ExpANSiON/uPGRADtNG/REPLACEMENT
arlm. to Sec
6
1
1
1
9
1
k
3
1
9
Primary
Secondary
2
1
k
7
2
3
2
7
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
1
1
1
1
Outfall
Interception
1
1
1
1
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Dther
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
1
8
2
6
1
1
19
Wf»L MtAJUfl
ICHEDULCD
3
7
6
3
19
-------
TABLE A-2A
o
RUN UATfc 68/12/17
i960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NEBRASKA
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=50C
500-1000
1COO-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50COO
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>50000C
TOTALS
TOTAL
* Of
PLANTS
0
H
16
6
1
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
44
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES T10N
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
13
16
6
1
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
44
0
3,535
10,330
8,050
4,500
31,950
37,800
0
0
0
0
0
96,165
TOTAL
# UF
PLANTS
1
76
47
34
10
6
3
1
0
1
2
0
181
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVtD
1
76
47
34
9
6
2
1
0
1
0
0
177
10,000
23,540
30,225
44,310
31,600
38,100
39,000
24,000
0
85,000
61,655
0
387,430
0
9
20
29
8
3
3
0
0
0
1
0
73
C
2,470
13,465
37,120
24,900
17,500
43,100
0
0
0
180.000
0
318,555
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
NEBRASKA
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
8
130
47
72
71
66
86
57
o
70
209
816
NUMBER
0
6
2
2
2
1
2
1
0
2
2
20
TOTAL
407,173
3,606, 119
1,649,784
3,620,048
2,687.535
2,432,369
5,122,003
4,336, 415
c
3,583,084
13,053,129
45,497,659
INTERCEPTORS
0
134, 115
12, 724
350,667
55,602
126,140
204,473
475,508
0
1,649, 821
6,634,404
9,643,454
NUMBER
2
10
3
9
5
1
2
3
0
o
3
38
NUMBER
0
5
2
3
1
3
7
0
0
24
49
NEW PLANTS
257,850
335,625
145,523
1,068,510
938,783
377,992
1,823,285
1,574,527
0
0
336,452
6,858,547
OUTFALL
0
10,296
104,652
83,250
248,414
47,713
680,921
709,547
0
o
1,861 ,177
3,745,970
NUMBER
1
43
13
6
2
0
1
o
o
1
1
68
NUMBER
1
18
14
13
4
2
I
3
c
1
1
58
LAGOONS
15,331
825,689
320,327
356,032
152,533
0
432,300
o
0
99,610
12,397
2 ,214,219
MISCELLANEOUS
63,533
537,72«
805,024
1 ,056,380
534,404
185,371
316,360
115,977
0
127,873
926,000
4,668,650
NUMBER
1
o
3
2
1
5
0
I
0
2
3
18
NUMBER
3
49
7
38
54
56
77
42
0
64
175
565
REPL.fi ADDS
29,847
o
127,587
90,558
20,350
804,030
0
6,603
0
122,327
442,991
1,644.293
SEWFRS
43,612
1 ,762,666
133,947
614,651
737,449
891,123
1 ,664,664
1,454,253
0
1,583,453
7,839.708
16,722,526
-------
TABLE A-4A
I960 CENSUS
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVFIMTORY
NEBRASKA
SECONDARY
N 0
PPPl IMINARY
TPEATMFNT
TCTAL # PF POPULA-
» OF CCMMUMTIES TITN
PLANTS SFKVF.1
IVJ
O
OJ
UNKNOWN
< = 50'J
500-1000
1000-2503
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
10QOOO-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0 0
o c
16 16
14 14
4 4
ft 4
0 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
0 0
52 52
0
?.M*
11,050
26,900
52,400
0
0
0
180,000
0
304,565
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
5
155
6?
51
14
R
4
1
0
2
1
0
304
# PF POPULA- MO. OF
CCMMIJNITIFS TICN CnMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVFC TIES SERVFO
4
155
6?
13
R
3
1
0
1
0
0
299
14,345
44,160
47,125
73,570
49, BOO
52,700
51,500
24,000
0
86,000
60,000
0
408,200
0
60
5
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
72
0
17,925
3,045
4,250
5,000
5,900
17,000
0
0
0
0
0
48,120
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
NEBRASKA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. Of
SRVO PLANTS
ro
o
jr
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2SOO
2500-9000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
125
53
56
13
8
6
0
1
1
0
0
263
0
126
53
57
13
9
6
0
2
1
0
0
267
<-
0.5
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1.0
0
55
23
1*
I
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
96
i r
1.2
0
23
11
10
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
49
in. ur t
1.4
0
7
e
6
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
•u «n i > i
1.6
0
12
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
15
IN site
1.8
0
3
1
fl
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
14
IA 1 CtoUF
2.0
0
6
3
7
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
20
IT ^-KB 1
2.5
0
6
3
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
•0
13
lu ur i
3.0
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.0
0
12
2
4
1
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
24
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
NEBRASKA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
rvi 5000-10000
o
01 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
139
61
58
15
14
9
0
1
1
0
0
298
0
140
61
59
15
15
9
0
2
1
0
0
302
0.5
0
24
23
20
4
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
75
1.0
0
58
21
16
6
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
110
i r
1.2
0
23
6
8
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
39
(U. ur r
1.4
0
6
3
4
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
16
•LAIM 1 3 1
1.6
0
11
1
1
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
18
11 aitc
1.8
0
2
2
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
La i COUK
2.0
0
3
1
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
T V^Nfl 1
2.5
0
4
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
9
ju ur i
3.0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
8
2
1
D
0
1
3
0
D
0
0
12
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
ro
o
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500
500 - 999
1000 - 4999
5000 - 9999
TABLE A-7A
NEBRASKA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
1
*
/FAC. 0
0
0
0
ERVEO 0
FAC. 0
i 1* 0
199 2* 0
•999 3* 0
1999 4* 0
!4999 5* 0
.9999 6* 0
(9999 7* 0
[49999 8* 0
>99999 9* 0
teOVE 0* 0
iERVED 0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
c
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
n
0
0
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
1
0
0
1
60COO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
2
1
0
1
265000
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2900
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
3
1
0
2
0
2
p
1
1
0
0
p
p
c
0
0
0
0
18000P
p
U5000
32500P
0
p
400
250P
p
0
0
0
n
0
0
290P
-------
TABLE A-8A
NEBRASKA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
^C. £00=
600-1000
1000-2800
2500-5000
6000-10000
10000-26000
26000-50000
56000-000000
100000-260000
260000-5COOOO
>>500000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 of "later
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
36
tt
2
1
9k
2
1
91
9k
EXPANSION/UPGR AD IN G/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
2
•}
2
2
9
9
9
Primary
Secondary
1
1
1
1
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfal
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Dthe
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
36
*7
•*
h
2
2
lOli
TOTAL pMJien
SCHEDULED
tU TIAI
?
1
101
loU
to
o
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN UATfc 68/U/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NEVADA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
ro
o
CO
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-10CO
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
1000Q-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100COO-250000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
2
2
I
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
« OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
2
2
2
1
0
0
C
0
c
0
0
7
0
1.200
1.290 •
3.000
3.500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a. 990
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
2
7
6
3
2
2
0
3
0
0
0
26
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
1
2
6
5
3
2
2
0
2
0
0
C
23
8,000
750
4,050
a, 500
10,500
12,100
29,500
0
225,000
0
0
0
298,400
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
390
550
1,200
4,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,640
-------
TABLE A-JA
f TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP — 1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
" POPULATION SIZE GROUP
at
" UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
*
NUMBER
3
2
3
4
9
4
5
0
34
17
0
81
TOTAL
89,795
391.644
139,035
1,088,446
3,247,303
449,984
311, B55
0
14.836,284
1,519,469
0
22,073,815
NUMBER
0
1
1
0
2
0
0
0
3
0
0
7
NEW PLANTS
C
331,717
61.060
0
2,277,090
C
0
p
7.485,066
0
C
10,154,933
NUMBER
0
0
2
C
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
N E
LAGOONS
P
0
77,975
0
107,000
0
0
0
0
51,822
0
236,797
V A 0 A
NUMBER
1
C
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
4
REPL.G AODS
8,688
0
0
452,385
0
91,753
0
0
8,000
0
0
561,026
M
O POPULATION sTzE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
2.500- 5,000....... .......
NUMBER
0
0
0
2
2
1
0
0
17
8
0
30
INTERCEPTORS
0
c
0
318,666
204,748
254,590
rt
•J
0
7,114,889
1,160,228
0
9.053,121
NUMBER
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
OUTFALL
0
0
0
c
128,900
C
C
0
0
0
c
128.900
NUMBER
1
C
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
MISCELLANEOUS
61,169
0
0
317,395
498,641
79,000
0
0
0
0
0
956.205
NUMBER
1
1
0
0
2
1
5
0
13
8
0
31
SEWERS
19,738
59.927
0
P
30,924
24,641
311.855
0
2?8.329
307,419
0
982.833
-------
TABLE A-4A
ro
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
x ? v A D A
SECONDARY
N n
P"?Fl IMIN4RY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
iOOOO-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
0 OF
PLANTS
n
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
« OF POPUIA-
C01MUMT1CS TION
SERVED
0
1
t
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
300
1,400
1,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,200
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
1
4
'
6
5
2
1
0
5
0
0
0
33
» OF PDPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVFD TIES SERVED
1 1?0,000
4 2,000
8 7,370
4 0,500
5 23,455
? 23,100
1 16,655
0 0
2 510,000
0 0
o o
0 0
27 712,990
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
390
0
l,l?5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,515
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
ro
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NEVADA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRFLIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
2
4
5
4
2
2
0
2
2
0
0
23
0
2
4
5
4
2
2
0
4
2
0
0
25
O
0.5
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1.0
0
1
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
8
i n
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
u. ur r
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
L«IN i a i
1.6
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
n a i te
1.8
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
U» 1 CM'JK
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T S = N« 1
2.5
0
0
0
1
0
0
. 0
0
1
0
0
0
2
I u ur i
3.0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
>4.0
0
0
0
1
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
-------
TABLE A-&A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL rfASTE INVtNlJKT
M E tf 4 D A
INDICATED LOADING / DHMESTIC LOADING PATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
S«VQ PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
4
6
7
t.
2
3
0
2
2
0
0
30
0
4
7
7
*
2
5
0
4-
2
0
0
33
0.5
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1.0
0
2
t>
2
2
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
15
i n
1.2
0
0
0
0
1
1
3
0
1
0
0
0
6
u, ur r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
LMN 1 i I
1.6
0
0
0
1
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
N il 4.C
1.9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
I, A < CllU^
Z.n
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T ^=* n i
2.5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
1 u J 1- 1
3,0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>*.3
0
0
0
2
3
J
0
0
3
0
3
0
2
-------
RUN DATE &S/12/17
ro
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECDNDARV
BELOW 500
TABLE A-7A
NEVADA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
PRELIMINARY
TOTALS
CQM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
I./FAC.
IT
SERVED
/FAC.
0 1*
999 Z*
4999 3*
9999 4*
24999 5*
49999 6*
99999 7*
249999 8*
499999 9*
ABOVE 0*
.SERVED
1
*
1
0
1
0
9CD
1
0
L
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
750
2
*
C
P
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3COO
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
C
9
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
p
c
0
0
c
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
Z
0
0
2
i to coo
1
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
190CC
8
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
^
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
fl
ft
0
ft
rt
0
0
0
0
n
3
G
I
2
C
3
0
Z
0
0
1
0
c
0
c
c
0
fl
0
900
17COOC
170900
0
0
37 50
fi
0
19000
0
0
0
0
c
22750
-------
TABLE A-8A
NEVADA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
<.IOO_
600-1000
1000-2600
2600-6000
6000-10000
10000-26000
26000-60000
60000-^00000
100000-260000
260000-600000
^•600000
"Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oFlater
Date not given
Total "Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sac
Primary
Secondary
1
1
1
1
INTERCEPTORS
1
1
1
1
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfall
Interception
1
1
1
1
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Other
NUMBER Of
COMMUNITIES
2
1
3
Toim PRO
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 60/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRfcLIMlNARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
NEW HAMPSHIRE
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-10CO
ro 1000-2500
i f
I
01 2500-5000
5000-10000
10COO-25000
25000-SOCOt
50000-100000
10COOO-25000C
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
1
0
1
1
5
1
0
0
0
0
9
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITItS TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
C
1
0
I
1
4
0
C
0
0
0
7
0
0
150
0
2,000
5,000
38,200
2,700
0
0
0
0
48,050
TOTAL * OF POPOLA- NO. OF
# OF COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
PLANTS IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVtD
C
1
0
3
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
10
0
1
C
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
600
0
1,800
3,000
5,360
400
400
0
0
0
0
11,560
0
0
5
24
11
10
2
3
1
0
0
0
56
0
0
4,200
20,850
16,400
33,400
23,000
64,000
62,000
0
0
0
223,650
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
NEW HAMPSHIRE
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
10tOOO-25.000
NUMBER
7
2
14
3
16
7
14
23
4
0
0
90
TOTAL
204,238
329,137
2,845,353
346,971
4,791,345
2.076,734
5,223,367
4,125.886
417,153
0
0
20,360.186
NUMBER
0
0
3
0
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
a
NEW PLANTS
0
0
1,977,981
0
850,451
446,693
0
1,151,666
0
0
0
4,426,791
NUMBER
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
5
LAGOONS
0
76,187
0
1C7.084
0
449,000
0
102.090
0
0
0
734,361
NUMBER
1
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
6
REPL.C ADOS
45,600
0
0
0
1,151,626
204,775
3.159,260
65,700
0
0
C
4.626,961
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
ro T _ ^
H»
OT UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
1 • 000-2 , 500
NUMBER
0
0
2
0
7
2
4
7
0
0
0
22
INTERCEPTORS
0
0
125,534
0
1,913,122
730,566
1,552,777
1,824,097
0
0
0
6.146,096
NUMBER
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
OUTFALL
16,182
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
16,182
NUMBER
2
1
0
I
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
10
MISCELLANEOUS
70,461
252,950
0
239,887
424,734
245,700
235,240
55,600
0
0
0
1.524.572
NUMBER
3
0
9
0
3
0
7
12
4
0
0
38
SEWERS
71,995
C
741,838
0
451,41?
0
276,090
9?6,735
417,153
0
0
2.8P5.223
-------
Ni
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTF INVENTORY
NEW HAMPSHIRE
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
0
1
0
0
4
•i
3
0
0
0
0
13
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
0
0
1
0
0
4
4
2
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
150
0
0
20,150
46,700
39,000
0
0
0
0
106,000
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
1
0
4
5
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
15
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIFS SERVED
0
1
0
4
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
0
flOO
0
3,800
14,400
B.200
1,500
2,500
0
0
0
0
31,200
0
0
5
22
11
6
2
1
1
0
0
0
48
0
0
4,800
18,550
10,200
21,600
?3,000
22,000
62,000
0
0
0
171,150
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAt
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
NEW HAMPSHIRE
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PPELIMINARV
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
ro
1— i
00
UNKNOWN
<"500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
0
1
5
4
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
15
0
0
1
5
5
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
16
<«
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
\ n
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
u. ur Y
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Lfl^ll 1
1.6
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
n Slit
1.8
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
V,A ICklUK
2.0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
T ^»K«I
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
iu ui-i
•j.c
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.?
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
0
0
1
1
1
C
0
0
0
C
0
t
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1966 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
NEW HAMPSHIRE
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LEADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO
. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
£J 10000-25000
to
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
2
1
8
5
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
2
1
9
6
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
24
<;„
0.5
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1.0
0
1
1
I
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
\ n
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
u. ui- K
1.4
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
4
L AH| 1 1 1
1.6
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
"I Slit
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
IAI CbUK
2.0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
T ^*KAI
2.5
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
l u j r- 1
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.3
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
NEW HAMPSHIRE
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
fVj BELOW 500 1*
ro
0 500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 ANO ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
3
#
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
(J
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
lit
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
c
0
p
0
p
0
0
n
p
0
0
0
r
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN UATe 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
P K I M A R Y
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NEW JERSEY
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=50C
500-1000
rO
£2 1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25COO
250 00-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250COO-500000
>500000
TOTALS
1UTAL
# OF
PLANTS
9
0
5
7
13
14
7
8
3
1
1
0
68
* UF POPULA-
CUMMUNITIES TION
IDENHFIAbLE SERVED
7
0
5
6
11
13
5
5
2
1
1
0
56
1,956,100
0
6,255
9,370
43,345
82,150
187,475
281,840
134,760
120,000
299,000
0
3,122,295
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
1C
1
4
11
30
30
41
9
1
2
0
0
139
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
6
0
4
9
26
25
28
8
1
1
'o
0
108
196,425
400
2,710
19,395
119,190
142,350
473.635
245,395
29,000
145,280
0
0
1,373,780
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
240
C
0
t
7,700
0
0
0
b
0
0
7,940
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
NEW JERSEY
ro
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
42
g
17
59
115
204
2^7
137
37
26
33
975
NUMBER
0
o
o
5
5
12
15
9
2
4
52
TOTAL
1,761,950
156,400
2,039, 85A
11,933, 362
26,277, 763
44,902,536
65,022, 831
34,851, 630
6,187,672
8,008, 527
21,041,702
222, 184, 231
INTERCEPTORS
0
o
o
440, 718
1,588, 512
3,850, 228
3,535,478
7,466, 773
2,786,000
913, 321
12,487,939
33,068,969
NUMBER
14
1
2
15
22
11
5
0
c
1
82
NUMBER
0
o
1
2
3
2
2
1
0
o
o
11
NEW PLANTS
617,593
1Q.B77
850 ,899
2 ,972 ,806
5,874,635
12,501,913
10,698,560
3,017,886
o
o
21 ,030
36,595,149
OUTFALL
C
o
43 ,769
75,976
442,720
45,942
502 ,677
20.3CC
c
c
o
1,131.384
NUMBER
0
o
1
o
o
o
o
1
NUMBER
4
1
1
4
11
16
23
12
2
1
0
75
LAGOONS
0
o
o
Q
69. 956
o
o
o
o
o
69.956
MISCELLANEOUS
120,884
57,435
23,470
3,856,619
1 ,709, 522
1 ,589,946
8,422, 193
3,966,588
1 ,612, 846
1 ,389, 333
0
21,848.836
NUMBER
5
1
7
19
19
10
1
3
2
NUMBER
19
1 7
35
74
132
227
101
33
20
26
683
REPL.6 ADDS
559,621
7. 97fl
DO . K yy
2 , 765 ,923
4,489,958
4, 143 ,845
451 ,630
88,993
3,936,550
17 050 290~
* '
SEWERS
463,852
EI .at,n
1 .nDo „ ^71;
4»4°7»721
16. 177.76Q
24 ,078 ,628
37,373,965
17, 136, 23R
1 .137. 1 oft
5,616, 880
4 ,596,183
112.419.647
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CFNSUS
1=168 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
NFW J C D, SPY
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
[\j 1000-2500
CO
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-75000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
*t or
PLANTS
14
2
7
10
22
21
10
7
•>
\
•>
0
93
H OF POPULA-
CCMMUNITIES TION
a
2
7
fl
18
15
4
4
2
1
1
0
71
1.H09.710
660
7,015
24,125
83,175
224,6fl5
103,050
243, "50
134,000
120,000
29", 000
0
3,050,270
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
17
0
18
42
66
57
12
2
2
0
0
221
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
Q
0
4
16
20
41
?0
*
0
1
0
0
178
^06,200
0
4,495
37,839
3^2,830
565,695
300, *95
50,000
145,755
0
0
2,107,364
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2,600
15,790
50,100
760
0
0
0
69,250
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1966 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NEW JERSEY
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
CNO. OF PLANTS IN SUE CATEGORY <-RATIO OFI
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
O500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
^ 5000-10000
4- 10000-25000
25000-50000
53000-100000
100000-250000
2500 00-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
13
13
44
45
47
39
14
5
6
3
1
230
0
25
19
60
55
57
46
15
6
7
3
1
294
0.5
0
2
3
4
10
10
5
3
0
1
0
0
38
1.0
0
9
3
12
6
14
7
3
1
1
0
0
56
1.2
0
1
0
4
6
8
6
0
0
0
0
0
25
1.4
0
2
0
3
3
a
4
2
1
0
1
0
24
1.6
0
0
0
8
7
9
9
1
0
1
0
0
35
1.8
0
0
0
4
7
3
?
1
0
0
0
0
17
2.0
0
1
1
0
2
1
4
2
0
0
0
1
12
2.5
0
0
3
7
3
0
»
1
1
1
2
0
21
3.0
0
0
0
5
4
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
15
3.5
0
0
2
4
1
1
3
0
1
1
P
0
1?
4.0
0
1
0
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
8
>4.0
0
9
7
7
3
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
30
-------
o
0)
CO
tfl
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
COM!"!. NO. OF <-
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
J^ 5000-10000
01 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
14
14
48
50
51
41
15
5
6
3
1
248
0
30
22
71
63
64
49
16
6
7
3
1
332
0.5
0
6
8
9
14
14
6
4
0
1
0
0
62
1.0
0
7
5
23
21
17
18
5
1
1
0
0
98
TABLE A-6A
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NEW JERSEY
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLAMTS IN SIZE CATEGORY <=RATIO OFJ
1.2
0
2
1
5
8
14
7
1
1
0
2
0
41
1.4
0
1
0
5
7
6
6
3
0
0
1
0
29
1.6
0
1
0
2
4
7
2
1
2
2
0
0
21
1.8
0
2
0
4
3
1
2
1
0
1
0
1
15
2.0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
4
2.5
0
1
1
7
2
1
2
0
0
2
0
0
16
3.0
0
0
0
1
2
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
10
3.5
0
0
1
4
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
7
4.0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
PRELIMIt4.0
0
>
6
7
2
2
3
0
3
3
0
3
26
-------
RUN DATE 66/12/17
PRELIMINARY
CO
TABLE A-7A
NEW JERSEY
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 I*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
6
0
2
4
48700
6
2
0
3
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
22610
4
6
0
3
3
37110
8
0
0
3
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
41280
5
*
6
0
0
6
107255
6
0
0
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
41980
6
*
3
0
0
3
85335
12
0
0
2
3
4
2
1
0
0
0
171515
7
*
Z
0
2
0
1C250C
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
8
*
5
0
4
1
2015900
89
0
0
6
20
37
15
7
2
2
0
1857055
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
28
0
11
17
0
121
2
c
17
28
43
19
8
2
2
0
0
0
0
2031080
365720
2396800
0
740
0
37170
169460
445970
498000
338600
20770P
436800
0
2134440
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE: INVENTORY
NEW MEXICO
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=50C
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10COO
1COOC-25COO
25COO-50000
50000-10COOO
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
1
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
# Of POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
1
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
c
0
0
5
0
250
0
2,946
0
2,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
5,196
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
9
7
14
10
10
12
7
0
1
0
0
70
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
9
7
13
8
8
7
5
0
1
0
0
58
0
5,030
4,385
21,200
25,200
64,800
122,310
150,600
0
200,000
0
0
593,525
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1,100
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
1,100
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
NEW MEXICO
00
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
8
8
10
t
2
6
13
17
o
19
3
92
NUMBER
1
0
3
1
2
o
7
0
9
0
24
TOTAL
516,368
173, 722
531,055
140( 800
1,637, 730
3,075,998
o
15, 532(001
0
23,096, 423
INTERCEPTORS
29,978
0
32, 92B
49 , 9 1 7
61.3CO
330, 964
0
1,434,493
o
8,042,568
0
9,982,148
NUMBER
2
0
I
o
1
o
1
1
o
1
o
7
NUMBER
1
0
o
o
o
o
1
1
o
o
o
3
NEW PLANTS
121,828
o
63,498
0
79,500
0
559,950
475,000
o
9C ,000
o
1 ,389,776
OUTFALL
135,787
o
o
o
o
o
153,246
93,730
0
c
o
382,765
NUMBER
0
5
1
o
0
3
0
o
o
o
10
NUMBER
1
2
5
3
0
o
3
2
0
3
0
19
LAGOONS
0
138,671
9,724
55,476
o
o
79,386
0
0
o
c
283,257
MISCELLANEOUS
49,089
33,551
379,472
472.921
0
o
653,290
551.292
0
3 .441.082
0
5,580.697
NUMBER
2
o
0
0
2
2
1
0
3
0
11
NUMBER
1
1
1
2
0
2
3
5
0
3
0
18
REPL.t ADOS
164,954
o
26.894
0
139.497
95.731
67.799
0
2 ,937,033
0
3,431,908
SEWERS
14,732
18,539
359,833
o
80 ,141
96,125
453,684
0
1,021.31 8
0
2,045,872
-------
TABLE A-4A
l£>
I960 CfcNSUS
1368 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
NEW MEXICO
IMAHY SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TRFATMFNT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
0
0
1
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
# OF
COMMUNITIES
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
POPULA-
TION
SERVED
0
0
0
1,600
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1,600
THTAL
« OF
0
u
11
17
*
11
10
5
0
2
0
0
79
# OF
COMMJNITIFS
0
13
11
1.6
8
10
7
5
0
1
0
0
71
POPULA-
TION
SFPVFO
0
24.050
6.3BO
40,220
?5,120
71,500
120,000
1*9,300
0
225,000
0
0
671,370
NO. OF
COMMUNI-
TIES
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
POPULATION
SFRVFD
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NEW MEXICO
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGORY <-RATin Oft
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
ro
CO
O
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
16
9
15
10
8
7
6
1
0
0
0
72
0
17
10
17
11
8
a
6
i
1
0
0
79
0.5
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1.0
0
1
1
3
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
1.2
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
5
1.4
0
2
3
4
0
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
16
1.6
0
5
1
1
1
2
2
1
0
1
0
0
14
1.6
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
4
2.5
0
1
0
3
3
1
I
0
1
C
0
0
10
3.0
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
3.5
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4.0
0
2
0
1
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
3
>4.0
0
3
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NEW MEXICO
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC L3ADING RATI3
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
^j 5000-10000
CO
h-k 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
16
9
15
10
9
7
6
1
0
0
0
73
0
17
10
17
11
9
8
6
1
1
0
0
80
<=
0.5
0
5
3
2
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
1.0
0
7
5
13
5
7
6
3
1
1
0
0
48
in
1.2
0
1
1
0
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
8
u. ur Y
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
LAW 1 A 1
1.6
0
0
1
I
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
IN ai te
1.8
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
i^ft i eiiUK
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T <.*KAI
2.5
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
.0
0
0
0
3
1U UM
3.0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
3
3
0
3
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRF11M1NARY
TABLE A-7A
NEW MEXICO
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMN./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
ro
U> SERVED COMM./FAC.
ro
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 a*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
1
0
0
I
12000
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
20CO
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
9
*
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
c
0
1
0
I
0
0
1
0
0
0
n
0
0
n
n
0
0
n
12000
12000
0
0
p
2000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2000
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NEW YORK
PKIHARY SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=5CO
500-1000
1COC-2500
PO
*£ 25 OQ- 5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50COO
50COC-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000.
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
23
10
20
5C
61
45
26
7
4
5
2
5
258
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
16
10
19
46
47
31
22
6
4
3
1
2
207
161f370
3tl80
15,420
85,700
153,630
189,274
379,370
225,685
269,060
778,905
223,875
766,200
3,251,889
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
36
9
12
23
20
21
11
6
1
1
1
11
152
# OF POPULi
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVE!
21
9
11
20
14
16
10
5
1
0
0
0
107
506,065
3,940
7,690
44,710
50,420
110,220
172,760
185,175
59,000
3,000
91,915
6,634,000
7,870,895
COMMUN1- POPULATION
TIES SERVED
4 22,775
13 3,070
25 14,564
49 72,060
15 54,970
10 71,675
8 235,545
3 114,110
1 66,000
2 225,500
0 11,360
0 1,432,000
130 2,323,649
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
NEW YORK
ro
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
70
25
44
135
121
134
261
216
117
165
327
1,615
NUMBER
0
2
5
9
15
15
19
3
11
94
TOTAL
6,265,790
5, 504, 836
6,516,249
26,223,475
27,045,489
31 ,938,016
45,459,104
52,043,382
11,099,475
20,706, 194
156,488,667
389,290,677
INTERCEPTORS
0
30 5 , 6 76
828,673
1,535,704
3, 266,239
2,754,439
4,212, 582
9,644,748
288, 706
3,095,079
45,826,758
71.778,604
NUMBER
14
5
5
18
19
11
15
9
2
2
4
104
NUMBER
3
o
2
2
4
3
5
1
3
0
3
26
NEW PLANTS
1,629,734
648,110
572.547
5,840,769
6,960,802
5 ,665,698
8,947,861
3,142,494
810 ,415
4,835.005
47,704,017
86,757,472
OUTFALL
345,586
o
723,010
38,520
812,851
286,086
1,076,937
15,033
473,310
0
2,271 ,120
6,042.453
NUMBER
1
o
g
1
0
o
0
0
o
o
o
2
NUMBER
2
4
3
4
9
8
15
5
4
2
5
61
LAGOONS
135, COO
Q
Q
10,834
0
0
o
o
o
o
o
145,834
MISCELLANEOUS
258,635
301 ,268
839, 381
1 ,127,047
2 ,210,229
1 ,479,963
6,735,933
2,161 ,001
612,006
668,484
12,660,830
29,054,777
NUMBER
15
1
o
19
10
15
21
16
5
6
37
145
NUMBER
35
13
29
82
64
86
190
166
100
151
267
1.183
RFPL.t ADOS
1.415,676
tfifl. 1 41
n
3.381. 157
2 ,780,682
6 ,062,650
5, 333,982
6,650,658
728,468
1,255,231
12,663,241
42, 729, 886
SEWERS
2,481,159
3,791 ,641
3 ,552,638
14.2R9.444
10,994.686
15 ,689,1 80
19,l*il.7a9
28,479,448
8,166, 570
10.852,395
35,362.701
152.781,651
-------
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4A
1968 "UNICIP4L WASTE INVENTORY
NEW YORK
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
M 1000-2500
CO
CTI 2500-5000
500C-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250COO-50000J
X500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
it Of
PLANTS
25
9
22
5*
57
52
3°
Q
4
5
3
4
283
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SFRVFO
15
8
20
46
43
26
26
6
4
2
1
2
209
232,020
16,0f»0
16,605
103,976
178,750
231,400
631, 165
239,720
211, 9°0
1,146,700
393,430
706,600
4,114,336
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
47
16
14
4?
25
30
24
20
6
5
I
11
241
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI-
SERVFO TIES
20
0
13
3'
21
26
1?
8
3
1
0
0
152
7"3, 655
14,095
16,780
02.515
84,165
178,740
217,305
260,830
2H7.475
327,850
oi,°15
6,701,000
9,156,325
0
13
21
42
13
6
4
2
1
3
0
0
105
POPULATION
SERVFO
l,c'75
3,320
11,594
59,105
47,385
45,190
03,790
104,810
72,350
240,500
0
1 ,180,500
1,860,509
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NEW YORK
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
ro
u>
en
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
37
36
89
74
62
42
21
10
5
3
4
383
0
77
55
104
81
73
47
23
13
8
5
9
495
0.5
0
1
1
1
2
3
4
1
I
I
1
0
16
1.0
0
18
11
20
14
18
5
2
3
2
0
1
94
» r
1.2
0
6
10
11
16
6
4
1
2
2
0
0
58
iu« ur t
1.4
0
8
10
17
13
2
7
1
1
0
0
0
59
•Lnnia i
1.6
0
5
5
8
6
6
8
4
0
0
1
1
44
in 9 lie
1.8
0
5
2
7
10
9
4
3
1
0
0
1
42
V« 1 CUU"
2.0
0
4
5
10
3
7
1
3
1
0
1
3
38
1 T S™ff« 1
2.5
0
5
5
11
10
11
9
2
2
1
1
2
59
in ur i
3.0
0
2
2
4
1
4
4
4
0
1
1
1
24
3.5
0
2
0
6
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
10
4.0
0
5
1
3
4
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
l«
>4.0
0
16
3
6
?
2
0
0
?
1
0
0
32
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NEW YORK
INDICATED LDAOING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
^° 5000-10000
CO
""' 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
39
17
90
75
62
43
21
10
5
3
4
389
0
81
56
105
82
73
49
23
13
8
5
9
504
<=
0.5
0
5
3
3
3
6
4
1
2
3
1
0
31
1.0
0
25
17
43
31
22
15
4
4
3
0
1
165
l r
1.2
0
11
9
12
14
7
5
3
2
1
0
1
65
iu. ur t
1.4
0
2
8
13
7
6
4
6
1
0
0
2
49
•L Am i i i
1.6
0
2
5
4
6
6
4
2
0
0
2
2
33
. m a i it
1.3
0
4
2
6
3
%
5
1
1
0
0
1
29
i.« i cuur
2.0
0
5
4
5
5
6
0
1
2
0
2
0
30
M S.»I\« 1
2.5
0
4
3
7
6
9
a
i
i
0
0
i
40
1U uri
3.0
0
2
2
4
1
1
2
3
0
1
0
1
17
3.5
0
2
0
2
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
8
4.0
0
5
1
3
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
14
>4.0
0
14
I
3
2
1
1
3
0
3
0
0
23
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
TABLE A-7A
NEW YORK
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC,
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
PO
OT SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500
500 - 999
1000 - 4999
5000 - 9999
10000 - 24999
25000 - 49999
50000 - 99999
100000 - 249999
250000 - 499999
500000 AND ABOVE
POPULATION SERVED
1*
2*
3*
4*
5*
6*
7*
8*
9*
0*
1
*
2
1
0
I
585
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
635
2
*
1
0
1
0
790
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20
3
*
11
2
7
2
33290
26
17
5
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
13702
4
*
8
0
5
3
61010
25
13
7
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
20264
5
*
17
4
7
6
379870
41
5
7
17
3
7
0
2
0
0
C
283021
6
*
8
0
5
3
287385
12
5
1
3
I
1
1
0 "
0
0
0
28725
7
*
10
1
5
4
720295
33
7
9
11
it
1
I
0
0
0
n
105457
8
*
6
2
3
1
1736415
87
11
10
20
19
13
7
5
2
0
0
1006794
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
63
10
33
20
0
227
61
39
58
29
22
9
7
2
0
0
0
0
443090
1973630
802920
3219640
0
14524
27007
132115
188870
261978
210765
408814
214545
0
0
1458618
-------
TABLE A-8A
NEW YORK
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
< 600
600-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
26000-60000
ebbbb-Tboboo
100000-260000
250000-500000
>-50bOOO
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 or'later
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
1
1
2
1
1
2
Secondary
7
1
3
1
3
1
1
-,
18
1
k
k
2
k
3
18
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
2
2
$
2
2
6
2
2
1
2U
3
2
k
7
1
7
2k
Primary
Secondary
1
1
1
1
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
1
1
1
1
Outfall
Interception
Plant
1
1
2
if
1
1
2
k
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Dthe
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
9
)(
8
2
],
11
3
3
2
1
1
U8
THAI pRAJten
SCHEDULED
1
7
8
7
111
1
12
50
to
CO
CO
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRtLIMlNAKY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NORTH CAROLINA
SECONDARY
N 0
TRtATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25CCO
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-50COOO
>50COOO
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
12
36
57
14
7
2
0
0
0
0
0
128
* OF POPULA-
CUrtMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
10
3C
44
13
4
1
0
0
0
c
0
1C2
0
4,920
17,810
57,720
44,995
25,300
14,500
0
0
0
0
0
165,245
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
4
14
32
24
14
21
7
6
5
0
0
127
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COHMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
4
10
27
17
10
13
5
3
3
0
0
92
0
1,185
8,105
41,580
55,435
73,700
197,315
175,000
228,300
354,115
0
0
1,134,735
3
10
8
35
17
13
7
2
1
0
0
0
96
21,050
2,235
10,345
49,720
58,110
84,750
96,475
67,700
61,000
0
0
0
451,385
-------
"I
.TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
NORTH CAROLINA
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
33
6
50
137
76
65
81
41
60
72
0
621
NUMBER
0
o
6
16
11
4
4
4
3
3
0
51
TOTAL
1,563,452
262<451
4,333, 511
17, 383,069
12 ,229,657
12,518,058
22,097, 826
16,117,820
16,308,395
18 ,152,0.82
0
121,016,341
INTERCEPTORS
0
o
531, 754
1,612, 759
1,569,168
633,487
1,097,953
2,625,507
945,531
2,873, 876
o
11,890.035
NUMBER
13
1
13
32
18
9
7
3
3
4
0
103
NUMBER
1
o
3
15
4
9
10
10
15
7
0
74
NEW PLANTS
884,173
22,204
1 ,469,270
6,337,110
5,311,362
4,921,041
4,899,798
3,412,307
3,097,920
7,591,475
0
37,946 ,660
OUTFALL
18,101
o
254,522
1,235,801
565,869
1,253,035
1 ,568,272
3,599,743
3,172,998
3,661,324
0
15,329,665
NUMBER
0
1
4
8
4
o
2
1
0
0
o
20
NUMBER
3
3
4
22
8
8
9
5
4
5
0
71
LAGOONS
0
40,000
234, 101
798,184
296,958
0
110,945
1,107,096
0
o
0
2,587,284
MISCELLANEOUS
119,720
179,989
211 .745
3,810,552
1 ,588,562
2,127,332
6,064,738
1,800,730
345,868
1,306.100
0
17,555.336
NUMBER
3
0
5
5
5
4
6
2
4
0
0
34
NUMBER
13
1
15
39
26
31
43
16
31
53
0
268
RE PL. 6 ADOS
73.730
o
369,975
587,318
996,784
667,895
1 ,907,009
1,259.174
1,724,804
0
0
7,606,689
SEWERS
467,728
20,258
1.292,144
3tDClf365
1,900,954
2,915,268
6,449,111
2,313,263
7,021,274
2,719,307
0
28,100.672
-------
TABLE A-4A
N>
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1966 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NORTH CAROLINA
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
*
26
30
6
7
3
0
0
0
0
0
R2
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
0
7
22
24
6
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
65
800
3,110
14,180
35,660
17,900
36,600
27,000
'o
0
0
0
0
135,250
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
14
19
33
77
38
24
25
9
7
17
0
0
26?
* PF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES T1PN COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
10
12
30
71
31
70
17
6
3
3
0
0
203
96,824
15,177
21,355
126,215
114,270
148,090
315,835
230,000
180,100
452.715
0
0
1,700,581
'1
7
4
8
8
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
33
6,000
1,285
2,722
10,700
30,300
9,580
21,500
51,000
0
0
0
0
133,087
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
GJ
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
NORTH CAROLINA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
29
48
91
33
23
23
7
3
2
0
0
259
0
49
57
108
39
27
28
11
5
2
0
0
326
<*
0.5
0
7
2
3
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
16
1.0
0
7
10
14
4
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
41
ir
1.2
0
3
7
6
3
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
24
«u. ur- *
1.4
0
4
7
15
3
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
35
'LAN Id 1
1.6
0
3
9
12
4
6
1
3
0
1
0
0
39
in ii£t
1.8
0
4
9
6
6
2
1
2
2
1
0
0
33
LA 1 tbUf
2.0
0
4
1
10
5
3
3
1
1
0
0
0
28
4.0
0
12
1
11
1
1
2
0
0
0
C
0
28
-------
TABU A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
r-o
JT
TOTAL
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
. 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
NORTH CAROLINA
INDICATED LOADING / OOKESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGORY <«RATIQ OFI
PRELIMINARY
COHH. NO. Of
SRVD PLANTS
0
33
50
94
33
23
24
7
3
2
0
0
269
0
55
60
112
39
27
29
11
5
2
0
0
340
<-
0.5
0
12
11
12
5
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
45
1.0
0
20
21
41
14
10
9
1
1
0
0
0
117
1.2
0
2
3
6
2
2
3
5
3
.1
0
0
27
1.4
0
4
5
7
6
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
27
1.6
0
3
6
fl
2
3
4
3
0
1
0
0
30
1.8
0
3
6
7
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
2.0
0
1
2
8
3
4
1
0
1
0
0
0
20
2.5
0
1
2
10
2
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
23
3.0
0
1
1
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
3.5
0
0
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
4.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.3
0
8
1
7
0
3
2
3
3
0
0
3
18
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
TABLE A-7A
NORTH CAROLINA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
-T SERVED COMM./FAC.
cn
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
I
*
b
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
1
c
0
2000C
1
c
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3000
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
fl
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
n
o
1
0
0
r
0
0
n
n
0
0
20000
0
0
20000
0
0
0
3000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3000
-------
TABLE A-8A
NORTH CAROLINA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
to
4k
05
SIZE Of PLACE
Unknown
^£ 600
600-1000
1000-2600
2600-6000
6000-10000
10000-26000
26000-60000
Boooo-lboboo
100000-260000
260000-600000
^•600060
Total
INDICATE!)
COMPLETION DATE
1966
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 or'later
Date not given
Total Projects
NEV
Primary
1
2
3
3
3
1 PLANT
Secondary
1
3
2
2
2
1
11
2
9
11
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
2
2
u
1
9
1
1
7
9
Primary
1
1
1
1
Secondary
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
1
6
7
INTERCEPTORS
1
•
1
1
1
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
2
k
3
1
1
1
1
13
3
10
13
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phoc. Reduction
•
Other
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
3
7
10
6
3
2
2
1
1
3$
TTJTAl MOJien
SCHEDULED
7
1
37
ID
-------
TABLE A-2A
ro
KUN OAlt bb/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NORTH DAKOTA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOtaN
<=5CC
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5COO-10COO
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# UF
PLANTS
0
9
12
10
1
0
0
1
o'
0
0
0
33
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
9
12
10
1
0
0
1
0
c
0
0
33
0
2,600
6,060
13,860
2,200
0
0
30,000
0
0
0
0
54,740
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
65
26
33
2
5
2
2
0
0
0
0
137
* OF POPULA- NO. Of
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
65
28
33
2
5
2
2
0
0
0
0
137
0
18,950
17,470
43,545
6,000
31,340
23,860
74,350
0
0
0
0
216,015
0
2
5
6
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
15
0
620
4,070
7,730
0
0
11,000
27,000
0
C
0
0
50,420
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—196Z - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
NORTH DAKOTA
rvj
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
6
38
19
3
2
9
38
o
0
o
126
NUMBER
0
3
o
2
o
I
o
1
o
o
o
7
TOTAL
131,231
1,073,036
301,851
690,951
82,686
121,127
2,473,177
3,350,715
0
0
o
8,224,774
INTERCEPTORS
0
101, 151
0
74, 500
0
108,549
"0
14,357
0
0
0
298,557
NUMBER
0
0
o
2
o
0
o
o
o
0
o
2
NUMBER
0
o
1
0
o
o
0
1
0
0
0
2
NEW PLANTS
0
0
c
4C,517
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
40,517
OUTFALL
0
0
22,075
0
0
0
0
376,386
0
0
0
398,461
NUMBER
1
20
4
1
0
0
1
0
0
o
31
NUMBER
3
5
3
7
2
0
3
8
0
0
0
31
LAGOONS
2,490
380,234
112.054
210,217
27,473
0
0
332,897
0
0
0
1,065,365
MISCELLANEOUS
44,952
95,852
118,458
214,100
55,213
0
980,668
851,572
0
0
0
2.360,815
NUMBER
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
4
NUMBER
1
9
3
4
0
I
6
25
0
0
0
49
REPL.t ADDS
39,400
61,799
0
0
0
0
C
531.368
0
0
0
632,567
SEWERS
44,389
434.000
49,264
151,617
0
12,578
1,492.509
1,244,135
0
0
0
3,428,492
-------
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4A
1968 .MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NORTH DAKOTA
SECONDARY
N 0
PBEL IMINARY
TREATMFNT
UNKNOWN"
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
ro
•*" 2500-5000
CO
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PL
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NORTH DAKOTA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SI2E CATEGORY <-RATIO OF)
1
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
ro 5000-10000
en
0 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-25QOOO
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
COMM. N
SRVD P
0
108
46
42
3
4
4
3
1
0
0
0
211
0. OF
LANTS
0
108
46
42
3
4
4
3
1
0
0
0
211
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
14
9
8
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
33
1.2
0
39
17
15
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
75
1.4
0
32
12
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
50
1.6
0
9
4
9
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
24
1.8
0
3
1
3
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
2.0
0
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
7
2.5
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
3.0
0
1
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
3.5
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
P
0
0
0
>4.0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NORTH DAKOTA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
CONN. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
tn 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
109
46
43
3
4
4
3
1
0
0
0
213
0
109
46
43
3
4
4
3-
1
0
0
0
213
0.5
0
31
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
- o
36
1.0
0
75
43
38
2
3
3
3
1
0
0
0
168
i ra
1.2
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
u. ur v
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LA^ia i
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n ant
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LaiCtoUKT
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
V«K«1
2.5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
i:j uri
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
,.o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.3
0
1
0
3
0
3
3
0
3
0
0
0
1
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
en
TABLE A-7A
NORTH DAKOTA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 ,
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
p
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
f)
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
1
1
r
0
0
0
n
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35
-------
TABLE A-8A
NORTH DAKOTA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
CO
en
CO
CITE HP pi APC
Unknown
^C 6°°
600-1000
1000-2500
2500-6000
6000-10000
10000-25000
26000-60000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>»5060GO
Total
INDICATED
COMPLtTICN DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 Greater
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
2
2
2
2
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec.
3
li
7
2
1
h
1
Primary
Secondary
1
1
1
•
3
1
2
3
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
1
1
1
1
Outfalt
Interception
Plant
1
2
3
3
3
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Dthe
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
7
$
3
1
16
TDIAL MO^CTw
SCHEDULED
PER T1AI
r
i
11
16
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN.DATE 60/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
OHIO
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOMN
0500
500-1000
££ 1000-2500
cn
*" 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
5
2
13
40
ia
17
19
7
4
0
0
4
129
« OF POPULA-
COHMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
4
2
13
3b
16
15
19
6
4
0
0
1
118
66,685
805
9,850
58,360
59.200
98,640
334,595
210,535
307,115
0
0
697,340
2,043,125
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
4
2
14
65
47
39
29
9
5
1
5
2
222
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION CONMUN1- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
4
2
13
61
45
36
27
9
3
1
4
1
20.6
16,095
360
11,725
146,360
158,520
288,455
388,660
321,070
288,030
141,000
1,531,580
1,081,825
4,373,680
0
4
28
35
9
6
3
0
0
1
0
0
86
0
1,370
22,730
53,380
35,335
43,660
36,325
0
0
166,690
0
0
359,490
-------
TABLE A-SA
ro
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP— 1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE.
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SUE.
NUMBER
34
. 11
. 45
. 107
. 191
. 283
. 154
. 123
• 39
• 368
. 1.498
NUMBER
1
. 13
. 10
. 10
. 14
. 7
• 8
. 28
97
TOTAL
1,534.471
1,157,237
4,714,743
17,099,01C
17,235,194
32,728,077
36,791,477
18,472,484
20,025,735
15,429,679
108,332.231
273,520,338
INTERCEPTORS
45,502
0
364,707
1,579,492
1,421.881
1.845.451
3,944.355
2,701,508
4,150,400
888.063
14,692.535
31,633,894
NUMBER
11
4
12
22
13
17
8
5
6
4
4
106
"NUMBER"
0
0
0
0
i
4
i
0
1
1
12
20
NEW PLANTS
239,724
248,896
1.207,722
3,464.571
2,990,528
10,339,970
713.665
2,124,940
3,437,505
7,700,796
11.556,110
44,024.429
OUTFALL
0
0
0
0
154,100
357,658
72 ,400
0
3,488
219,275
7,529.164
8,336,085
NUMBER
0
0
1
7
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
12
"NUMBER"
0
0.
0
6
5
3
a
2
1
1
6
32
0
LAGOONS
0
0
247,841
811.794
54,337
302,555
0
0
0
0
0
1,416,527
MISCELLANEOUS"
0
0
0
696.816
552,269
1,192.385
1.182,307
359,850
30.935
179,787
1,128.737
5,323,086 1
H I 0
NUMBER
8
0
4
20
13
13
23
11
3
4
29
128
"NUMBER
14
7
24
75
64
141
229
129
104
27
289
.103
REPL.C ADDS
854,148
0
606,331
2,400,309
1.410.116
3,713,831
9,533.276
1,301,981
3,236,214
1,301,157
28,581,706
52,939,069
SEWERS
395,097
908.339
2,288,142
8,146,028
10,651.963
14,976,227
21,345,474
11,984,205
9,167,193
5.140,601
44.843,979
129,847,248
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
OHIO
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
O5CO
$00-1000
1000-2500
m 2500-5000
OT
5000-10000
10000-25000
2 50 00- 50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
> 500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
13
3
10
30
14
13
16
6
4
1
0
4
lit
It Of POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
9
3
10
29
14
11
16
6
3
1
0
1
103
122,885
845
7,790
44,780
52,965
81,665
280,890
209,820
283,830
180,500
0
300,000
1,565,970
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
87
15
30
104
60
56
37
11
7
1
6
2
416
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
29
6
28
95
50
44
31
9
4
1
4
1
302
16,070
5,930
16,895
229,340
193,420
395,290
500,405
345,405
369,460
126,000
1,635,880
1,265,000
5,098,195
0
4
24
17
5
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
54
U
l,46u
19,475
26,871,
23,950
16,29b
26,40l,
b
0
L
U
0
114,445
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
OHIO
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
rO
^ 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
20
46
121
66
59
51
15
9
4
2
2
395
0
32
69
146
78
65
53
17
10
4
4
3
481
<=
0.5
0
0
2
3
0
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
10
1.0
0
14
35
37
13
11
7
2
1
0
0
1
121
tr
1.2
0
7
11
26
21
16
7
2
1
0
0
0
91
tu» ur i
1.4
0
0
4
29
13
12
10
3
1
1
0
0
73
'LftNlb 1
1.6
0
0
3
21
7
9
5
0
1
1
1
0
48
IN bI£E
1.8
0
0
6
10
9
6
9
1
0
0
1
0
42
CATtGUI
2.0
0
0
2
7
3
4
1
0
1 "
0
0
1
19
4.0
0
6
1
2
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
13
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
OHIO
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. Of
SRVD PLANTS
ro
01
CO
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2SOO-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
23
48
131
67
63
55
16
9
4
3
2
421
0
35
72
160
SO
69
58
19
10
4
5
3
515
O
0.5
0
3
18
19
12
8
2
1
0
0
0
0
63
1.0
0
14
31
63
35
24
18
8
3
1
0
1
198
I r
1.2
0
8
0
24
15
15
9
4
1
1
1
0
87
«u. ur r
1.4
0
2
2
20
5
8
8
0
0
0
0
0
45
'LAIN Id 1
1.6
0
1
2
6
1
9
10
4
3
2
0
0
38
n »i te
1.8
0
0
3
5
3
3
4
2
0
0
1
1
22
IB 1 CUUK
2.0
0
0
2
*
1
2
3
0
1
0
3
1
17
IT S«RAI
2.5
0
2
1
6
3
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
17
IU ur l
3.0
0
1
0
9
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
3.5
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
4.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.0
0
4
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
9
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
I\J
TABLE A-7A
OHIO
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMH./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 2149999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
1
0
1
0
350
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
4
0
0
4
10345
4
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4225
4
*
1
0
0
1
10360
1
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4160
5
*
3
0
3
0
71895
4
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
34035
6
3
0
2
1
112590
3
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
70950
7
*
3
0
3
0
232640
7
2
0
0
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
74515
8
*
11
1
3
7
3751850
75
6
7
23
13
IT
7
2
0
0
0
785480
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
1
12
13
0
94
8
8
29
16
22
8
3
0
0
0
0
0
166690
1227030
2796310
4190030
0
2140
5755
84000
104460
298920
278970
199120
0
0
0
973365
-------
TABLE A-8A
OHIO
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
«^ 800
600-1000
1000-2600
2600-6000
6000-10000
10000-26000
2500pr60000
sooob-Tbodoo
100000-260000
260000-600000
^600060
~Totil
_ INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oDater
Date not given
Total Project*
NEVA
Primary
1 PLANT
Secondary
1
3
$
2
1
•
12
2
$
2
3
12
EXPANSION/
Prim, to Sec
2
$
12
1*
7
10
$
2
1
1*
S2
8
6
6
8
18
6
&
UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Primary
.1
1
1
1
Secondary
2
12
$
6
h
2
2
2
3$
h
7
5
1
1
ii
13
35?
INTERCEPTORS
1
1
1
2
3
2
2
I
1
lit
1
13
111
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
2
2
6
28
10
Hi
10
*
2
2
3
81*
19
6
2
3
16
38
8Ii
Outfall
Interception
Plant
1
1
1
1
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Other
1
1
2
2
2
8
8
8
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
6
3
Hi
hi
21
23
21
9
h
1
3
2
•tfli
TOTAL p«6JICT!
tCHEDULED
reft ylAft
2?
27
Hi
10
9
ho
82
207
-------
TABLE A-2A
!NJ
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
OKLAHOMA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10COO
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-50COOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
9
15
8
2
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
37
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES T10N
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
9
15
8
2
0
1
1
0
0
c
0
36
0
2,975
8,960
10,150
3,800
0
24,000
35,000
0
0
121,000
0
205,685
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
0
27
52
62
33
30
22
5
1
0
7
0
239
» OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
27
52
60
33
25
17
3
1
0
2
0
220
0
7,540
32,168
86,252
104,670
166,790
-- 257«269
119,300
60,000
0
403,600
0
1,237,589
0
1
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
100
1,550
5,500
1,900
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
9,050
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE CROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARUS
OKLAHOMA
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 14
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 0
TOTAL
513,811
2.146,749
1,939. 113
3.98C, 341
2,436,708
2,321,937
5,655,892
4,980, 691
o
c
15,488, 737
39,463, 979
INTERCEPTORS
0
8,085
52.564
741. 892
267.450
65, 665
1,409,049
1.798, 644
o
o
4, 169,432
8,513,181
NUMBER
1
o
3
2
2
4
2
o
o
o
15
NUMBER
2
2
o
1
1
2
5
4
o
o
8
25
NEW PLANTS
31,834
0
23,760
145,967
252.100
50C,066
1,877,803
1.308,232
o
o
0
4.139.762
OUTFALL
118,194
71.189
o
74 , 863
20.00C
269,667
1,186,224
721 .662
o
o
1 ,400,965
3.862.804
NUMBER
2
22
10
14
2
1
I
0
o
o
2
54
NUMBER
I
19
10
11
7
5
3
2
o
o
1
59
LAGOONS
134.944
413. 240
367.536
799,223
238,272
27,633
49,C24
o
o
o
179.000
2 ,208.672
MISCELLANEOUS
2C.595
903.969
991,611
1 ,040,528
834,491
872.531
229.709
280.628
0
0
359.225
5.533,487
NUMBER
3
I
1
1
3
4
3
2
o
o
3
21
NUMBER
5
7 '
10
10
11
26
11
o
o
111
206
REPL.C ADDS
122.015
44,361
17.332
46,673
287,440
274,300
214,514
668,350
o
0
664, 794
2,339,779
SEWERS
86,229
7C5.905
4R6.310
1 .1M, 195
536,955
311.855
689.569
202,775
o
0
8.715.301
12.866,094
-------
TABLE A-4 A
1960 CENSUS
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
OKLAHOMA
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
ro
500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
7
9
4
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
23
# OF POPULA-
COilMUNITIES TION
SERVED
0
7
9
4
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
22
0
2tl70
5,0°0
5tAOO
0
0
24,000
38,000
0
0
121,000
0
195,6*0
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
80
79
*0
33
2 =
74
5
1
0
fl
0
345
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SF.RVED TIPS SERVED
1
78
79
74
36
25
16
3
1
0
2
0
315
165
?7,865
58, 095
120,449
126,125
165,185
306,744
125,300
74,000
0
442,700
0
1 ,446,628
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
290
1,000
2,800
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,090
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/11
CD
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
OKLAHOMA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
59
65
51
28
20
14
5
2
0
0
0
244
0
61
66
54
31
22
14
6
3
2
0
0
259
0.5
0
2
2
1
1
1
1
0
0'
0
0
0
8
1.0
0
5
14
21
9
6
5
2
1
0
0
0
63
l r
1.2
0
9
10
7
3
6
1
1
0
1
0
0
38
»u. ur t
1.4
0
6
9
10
IS
1
4
0
2
0
0
0
38
•LAPI 13 J
1.6
0
5
4
5
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
17
in site
1.8
0
9
4
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
17
in i ei»u»
2.0
0
3
8
4
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
22
IT ^*K»I
7.5
0
9
7
3
3
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
25
III Ufl
3.0
0
3
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
3.5
0
3
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
8
4.0
0
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
>4.0
0
5
2
0
1
1
1
0
c
0
0
0
IP
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
OKLAHOMA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
ro
CO
en
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
71
78
62
32
24
15
7
2
0
0
0
291
0
73
79
66
36
26
16
8
3
2
0
0
309
<=
0.5
0
32
45
27
14
8
6
1
0
0
0
0
133
1.0
0
28
21
30
13
11
7
7
3
1
0
0
121
ir
1.2
0
4
3
5
2
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
18
4U. Ul- K
1.4
0
2
1
1
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
LAtNIi 1
1.6
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
IN il Lt
1.8
0
1
3
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
LA 1 tl>UK
2.0
n
i
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
T ^=K«I
2.5
0
2
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
lu ur i
3.0-
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4. 3
0
2
1
3
0
J
3
0
3
3
3
0
3
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
TABLE A-7A
OKLAHOMA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100300 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
400
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
1
0
0
1
10000
c
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
I
0
1
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
r
0
0
0
1000C
10000
0
0
400
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
400
-------
TABLE A-2A
M
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
OREGON
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-25CO
2500-50CO
5000-1000C
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
7
11
12
9
6
3
1
1
0
1
0
51
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNIT1ES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
6
9
10
9
6
3
1
1
0
1
0
46
0
1,500
6,690
22,200
31,600
41,960
31,100
52,000
45,000
0
364,000
0
596,050
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
11
13
18
22
12
14
6
0.
0
0
0
0
96
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SfcRVED
11
12
IS
22
11
11
6
0
0
0
0
0
91
20,650
3,060
14,510
29,550
37,210
73,500
93,700
0
0
0
0
0
272,180
0
4
3
5
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
IS
0
950
1,650
3,300
6,500
8,500
39,500
0
0
0
0
0
60,600
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPUUTI
POPULATION SI2E GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
ro
^ „-„-„„,.. L __.__, ,L^ ., _!_
00 UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
ON SIZE C
NUMBER
21
18
31
30
38
111
81
16
70
o
79
495
NUMBER
3
2
z
2
5
16
4
4
3
o
15
56
iROUP— 1962 - 19
TOTAL
536,127
1.196,546
2,334,902
2,683,292
3,036, 513
9, 116,533
4,809,266
12,446,309
10 ,667,007
o
12,352, 183
59,678,680
INTERCEPTORS
74,385
41i 345
51,653
59, 507
190,247
2,279, 802
774, 120
3,080,544
623,006
0
5,935, 735
13,110,344
67 CONTRAC1
NUMBER
4
5
4
6
4
2
o
1
1
o
2
29
NUMBER
0
o
1
0
o
1
1
o
1
o
o
4
r AWARDS
NEW PLANTS
111.309
443,652
594,264
672,203
504,268
1,009,520
0
2,715,577
452,481
0
818,160
7,321,434
OUTFALL
C
0
36,517
0
0
57,300
20,077
0
594,152
0
0
708,046
NUMBER
0
3
8
3
0
3
1
0
0
o
o
18
NUMBER
0
2
1
2
3
4
3
1
4
0
4
24
0 R
LAGOONS
0
160,260
708,321
282,686
0
391,151
106,669
0
0
0
o
1,649,087
MISCELLANEOUS
0
100,323
75,300
195,851
256,203
160,003
194,614
113,390
641,978
0
787,019
2,524,681
E G 0 N
NUMBER
2
0
2
4
7
7
5
1
1
0
1
30
NUMBER
12
6
13
13
19
78
67
9
60
0
57
334
RFPL.t ADDS
14,096
0
83,611
68,078
828,182
1,166,804
1,377,443
369,814
1 ,215,328
0
297,100
5,420,456
SEWERS
336,337
450,968
1,285,236
1,404,967
1,257,613
4,051,953
2,336,343
6,166,984
7,140,062
0
4,514,169
28.944,632
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CENSUS
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVFNTOPY
OREGON
PRIMARY SECONOAR. Y
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
I
7
8
6
6
3
?
0
1
0
1
0
35
» OF POPULA-
COWUNITIES TIDN
SFKVED
1
7
7
5
6
3
2
0
1
0
1
0
33
2,950
3,262
5,920
",100
24,600
20,720
13,000
0
75,000
0
340,000
0
494,552
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
n
17
32
?*
17
17
8
1
0
0
0
0
133
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SFRVFO TIES SF.RVFO
12
16
32
28
16
14
8
1
0
0
0
0
127
103,140
6.200
30,020
44,680
68,630
127,430
152,800
70.000
0
0
0
0
602. «00
0
4
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
950
660
1,700
3,000
0
31,000
0
0
0
0
0
37,310
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
OREGON
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGORY <«RAT!0 OF)
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
ro
-j
o
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
21
35
44
26
18
13
3
2
0
1
0
163
0
22
35
45
26
21
13
3
2
0
1
0
168
0.5
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1.0
0
3
10
8
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
25
1.2
0
3
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
1.4
0
1
3
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
9
1.6
0
1
2
6
2
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
16
1.8
0
2
1
5
3
2
0
0
0
o
1
0
14
2.0
0
0
0
6
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
9
2.5
0
1
7
5
4
3
5
0
2
0
0
0
27
3.0
0
1
3
6
7
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
22
3.5
0
0
t
2
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
IP
4.C
0
3
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
>4.0
r
4
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
ro
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
OREGON
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<"500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
21
35
44
26
18
13
3
2
0
1
0
163
0
22
35
45
26
21
13
3
2
0
1
0
168
<«
0.5
0
16
20
15
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
57
1.0
0
3
7
10
6
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
29
1 N
1.2
0
0
1
3
2
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
12
u. ur i
1.4
0
0
1
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
'LANi:> 1
1.6
0
0
0
1
3
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
10
IN bl it
1.8
0
0
1
2
3
3
2
0
0
0
1
0
12
LAI tliOl
2.0
0
1
1
3
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
10
4.3
3
0
3
3
0
1
3
3
3
0
3
0
4
-------
RUM DATE 68/1Z/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
ro
OREGON
JOINT TREATHFNT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1+
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
1
0
1
0
6000
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2000
4
*
1
0
1
0
11000
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3000
5
I
0
0
1
25000
1
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2000
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
• 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
3
0
2
1
0
3
0
c
3
p
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
17000
25COO
4200P
0
0
0
7000
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
7000
-------
TABLE A-8A
OREGON
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
^^ BOJL
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-6000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
60000-100000
100000-250000
250000-5COOOO
^>600000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
19E9
1970
T971
1972
1973 o'Dater
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
2
2
1
1
6
2
2
1
1
6
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec,
2
k
$
7
3
1
22
3
2
16
1
22
Primary
Secondary
2
1
3
2
2
2
12
7
2
2
1
12
INTERCEPTORS
1
1
1
1
1
$
3
1
1
5
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
1
3
1
3
1
2
1
12
k
6
1
1
12
Outfall
3
1
1
1
6
3
2
1
6
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos Reduction
Dthe
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
3
£
It
12
9
7
3
1
lili
•DIAL MOJICT1
•CHEDULtD
PCH MAI
22
15
u
18
h
63
to
~3
CO
-------
TABLE A-2A
KUN OAU 68/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
PENNSYLVANIA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1COO
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
KOOO-25000
25COO-50000
600CO-100000
1COOOO-25000C
250000-500000
>5COOOO
TOTALS
TOTAL
* UF
PLANTS
3
b
a
30
la
20
20
4
3
0
0
2
120
» OF POPULA-
CCMhUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
2
6
6
33
IB
18
lo
*
3
C
C
0
108
45,315
1,775
7,925
65,480
67,060
155,450
332,085
177,265
313,000
0
0
2,212,000
3,377,355
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
IB
8
17
42
47
66
42
7
12
2
0
1
262
# UF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVtU
13 1,791(640
6 2,910
15 11,150
37 75,967
41 162,560
54 382,500
25 476,975
6 230,000
7 510,150
2 265,000
C 0
1 1,097,000
207 5,005,852
1 1,800
17 6,580
54 41.90&
90 143,265
50 174,665
42 289,920
16 273,910
1 32,055
0 68,000
1 129,000
0 0
0 C
274 1,161,120
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BV POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
PENNSYLVANIA
cn
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUM9EP
101
16
65
187
214
32 I
305
101
103
51
1, 773
NUMBER
0
0
7
27
22
27
24
3
10
6
16
142
TOTAL
4,605,826
2,763,261
8,249, 961
33,548,076
36,525, 153
77,070 ,4C4
45,514,663
12,823, 821
36,563,941
12,734, 743
74,822,182
345,222,031
INTERCEPTORS
0
o
355,614
3, 700, 822
3,606,339
9, 362, 330
5,523, 282
1 f 132, 326
1 1,668, 992
3,674,869
7,439,202
46,463,776
NUMBER
52
IB
39
33
34
16
2
5
2
7
212
NUMBER
0
o
o
3
3
0
2
o
8
NEW PLANTS
2.441,614
461 ,867
2, 524,153
9,440 ,462
9,846,469
17,934,207
6,717,712
2,882 ,874
10,238,318
798 .203
6,002,871
69,288 ,750
OUTFALL
0
o
52,105
11 ,300
10 ,450
193,407
o
61 ,140
328,402
NUMBER
0
o
o
I
o
1
o
o
o
o
o
2
NUMBER
4
2
1
14
10
19
12
3
5
4
74
LAGOONS
0
0
o
118,000
c
454,022
o
o
o
0
0
572,022
MISCELLANEOUS
774,405
122,010
19,4CO
1,781, 595
906,489
2 ,764,644
4, 172, 519
317.245
4,827,076
c
40 6 , 9 1 3
16,092,296
NUMBER
6
1
3
12
16
22
15
6
13
4
40
138
NUMBER
39
9
36
91
133
217
237
87
68
39
241
1,197
REPL.fi ADOS
424,442
143, 005
96.450
1 , 149,751
6,370,062
2 ,698.929
2,990,638
2,435,020
4,084,102
4,288,718
4,574,856
2°, 255. 973
SEWERS
965,365
2 ,036,379
5,254,344
17,305.341
15, 795,794
43,844.972
26. ICO, 062
6,056.356
5,552,046
3,972,953
56.337.200
183,220,812
-------
TABLE A-4A
CO
I960 CENSUS
1«68 MUNICIPAL HASTF 1NVFNTOPY
PENNSYLVANIA
MARY SECONDARY
N 0
PRFL IMINAO.Y
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# Of
PLANTS
2
7
13
?«
22
26
21
2
3
0
0
?
136
* OF PDPULA-
COMMUNITIES TICN
SERVFO
1
6
10
35
20
23
19
2
3
0
0
0
119
15,315
3 , 645
11, 550
78,000
80,085
194,135
319,375
105,000
305,000
0
0
2,212,000
3,325,905
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
19
7
M
5-?
62
72
47
11
13
»
0
1
314
« OF POPULA- NO. IF
COMMUNITIES TICN COMMUNI- POPULATION
SFRVF.D TIES SFPVEO
14
5
10
e?
51
57
?8
0
7
2
0
1
245
428. «1*
2,360
17,235
118,394
229,140
460,500
585,265
1.M2.MS
487,800
265,000
0
1,007,000
5,573,884
3
1«
55
80
42
?3
14
0
0
1
0
0
237
8,300
8,805
47,015
133,750
170,800
160,255
224,165
0
68,000
1?9,000
0
0
950,090
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
ro
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
PENNSYLVANIA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
20
34
80
78
75
50
22
9
4
0
1
373
0
37
36
85
82
83
54
22
9
4
0
1
413
<»
0.5
0
2
6
14
15
16
4
0
0
0
0
0
57
1.0
0
12
5
19
15
14
6
6
3
0
0
1
81
i »
1.2
0
4
5
6
9
6
3
4
1
0
0
0
38
ID. ur r
1.4
0
0
2
10
10
8
9
4
3
0
0
0
46
•L«ni a i
1.6
0
1
3
12
12
5
8
4
0
0
0
0
45
in site
1.8
0
1
4
5
4
5
3
2
1
0
0
0
25
LA 1 CtiUK
2.0
0
2
3
5
8
6
7
1
0
1
0
0
33
u v.=n« i
2.5
0
0
1
5
1
7
6
0
1
2
0
0
23
I 1 u ur i
3.0
0
1
2
4
1
10
2
1
0
0
0
0
21
3.5
0
2
1
0
3
4
4
0
0
1
c
0
15
4.0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
>4.0
0
12
3
4
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
26
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
PENNSYLVANI A
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SUE CATEGORY <»R4TIO OF)
PRELIMINARY
COMH. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
M 5000-10000
00 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
21
36
83
80
77
51
22
10
5
0
2
387
0
38
38
88
85
85
55
22
10
5
0
4
430
0.5
0
9
9
26
20
18
10
1
0
2
0
0
95
1.0
0
13
14
31
28
38
21
9
6
1
0
2
163
1.2
0
3
2
8
7
4
7
7
2
0
0
1
41
1.4
0
2
1
4
9
7 .
2
2
I
1
0
1
30
1.6
0
1
2
5
7
5
3
2
1
1
0
0
27
1.8
0
1
2
4
3
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
16
2.0
0
0
1
1
2
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
1
2
4
3
2
0
3
0
0
0
12
0
0
1
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
1
2
0
1
I
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
>4.0
0
>
3
3
3
0
2
0
3
3
0
D
20
-------
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
--J
CD
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500
500 - 999
1000 - 4999
5000 - 9999
10000 - 24999
25000 - 49999
50000 - 99999
100000 - 24999
250000 - 49999
50COOO AND ABOVE
POPULATION SERVED
PENNSYLVANIA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
1
*
C. 0
0
0
0
'ED 0
:. o
1* 0
2* 0
1 3* 0
I 4* 0
19 5* 0
19 6* 0
)9 7* 0
199 8* 0
199 9* 0
'E 0* 0
'ED 0
2
*
3
2
1
0
3540
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5020
3
*
11
I
4
6
35210
12
0
1
B
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
29630
4
*
29
9
9
11
243275
43
0
3
19
13
5
3
0
0
0
0
239068
5
*
24
5
9
10
464945
56
1
5
23
13
10
3
1
0
C
C
353588
6
*
11
0
3
fl
44 80 00
17
0
2
4
10.
0
1
0
0
0
0
111940
7
*
10
1
•»
6
841200
49
2
2
22
11
11
0
1
0
0
0
284160
8
*
8
1
2
5
5303COO
79
2
1
25
23
21
5
2
0
0
0
779938
9
*
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
o
96
19
31
46
C
258
5
15
10?
73
47
12
4
C
0
r
0
0
346330
2961420
4031420
7339170
0
1830
iC2or
266? 70
442470
605915
299881
176778
0
0
0
1803344
-------
TABLE A-8A
PENNSYLVANIA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
ci7c f\c PI APF
Unknown
^Z 600
600-1000
1000-2500
2600-6000
6000-10000
10000-26000
26000-60000
60000-100000
100000-260000
260000-600000
^•500000
Total
INDICAtrb
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oMater
Date hot given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
2
1
1
k
1
I
2
h
Secondary
5
l
12
18
9
8
5
58
••••^••••••••••••MW
1
So
7
58
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
1
2
8
7
1
2
21
17
k
21
Primary
Secondary
2
2
8
k
1
17
10
7
17
INTERCEPTORS
1
1
1
1
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
2
h
i
7
7
7
Outfall
1
1
1
1
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
•
Dther
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
5
2
16
28
13
23
10
3
100
TOTAL pHOAcrl
ICHEDUlfD
2
1
86
20
109
-------
TABLE A-2A
HUN UATE 6B/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
PUERTO RICO
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
M 1000-2500
CO
(_i 2500-5000
5COO-10000
10000-25COO
25000-50000
50000-100000
1CCOOO-25000C
250COO-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
1
11
16
5
1
0
0
a
i
0
3i
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNIT1ES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
C
C
1
11
16
5
1
C
0
C
1
0
35
0
0
280
2,895
7,505
4,610
1,165
0
0
0
58,660
0
75,115
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
1
8
8
5
1
1
0
0
0
0
24
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
0
1
8
8
5
1
1
C
0
0
0
24
0
0
70
1,709
7,125
4,745
850
5,340
0
0
0
0
19,839
0
0
0
0
3
1
3
1
1
1
0
0
10
0
0
C
0
615
540
4,440
4,415
6,360
10,310
0
C
26,630
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SUE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
PUERTO RICO
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
250,300 AND OVER...
f\J —_— — — — — -.. ............
CO * r r- - - I - r - - '
1X> POPULATION SUE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
250,000 AND OVER..
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 4
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 2
TOTAL
2, 102*027
o
264*458
695,426
l,500t Oil
539,608
2, 569.179
1,665. 884
76.027
2,569, 292
3.894.864
15.896.778
INTERCEPTORS
1,354,097
0
0
144,708
0
0
1,948,330
o
o
483,572
1,792,907
5,723,614
NUMBER
0
o
1
3
3
2
1
1
0
0
o
11
NUMBER
0
0
0
0
0
c
o
0
0
0
0
0
NEW PLANTS
0
o
242,055
372.320
764.497
498.508
585 .404
717.319
0
0
0
3, 180*103
OUTFALL
0
0
•
0
0
o
o
o
o
c
o
c
0
NUMBER
0
0
o
o
o
0
o
0
o
0
0
o
NUMBER
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
2
4
10
LAGOONS
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
MISCELLANEOUS
0
0
42.403
98,414
564,478
0
0
o
0
1,373,821
2,101,957
4,181,073
NUMBER
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
NUMBER
2
0
0
3
3
1
1
2
1
8
0
21
REPL.E ADDS
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
SEWERS
747,930
0
0
79,986
171,036
41,100
35,445
948,565
76,027
711,899
0
2,811,988
-------
TABLE A-4A
PPFLIMINARY
1«60 Cf-NSUS
UNKNOWN
< = 500
50C-1000
1000-2500
2500-5010
5000-10000
10000-25000
2500C-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
1068 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTflPY
PUCRTP PICO
TOTAL
» f)F
PLANTS
0
0
1
H
16
4
1
0
0
0
1
0
34
P R I M A
# I'F
0
0
1
11
16
*
1
0
0
0
1
0
34
f Y
POPULA-
[ E S T I ON
SFRVFO
0
0
PRO
11 ,1?5
21.314
10,335
1,200
0
0
0
450,000
0
495,174
S
THTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
0
i
3
=1
6
1
1
0
0
0
0
25
F c o N P A <
* OF
COMMUNITIES
0
0
1
P
R
f,
1
1
0
0
0
0
25
I Y
POPULA-
TION
SERVED
0
0
1,145
13,fi50
71,150
?6.610
5,500
3«,600
0
0
0
0
157,855
NO T R
NO. OF
COMMUNI-
TIES
0
0
0
0
2
I
3
1
1
1
0
0
c
E A T M E N T
POPULATION
SERVED
0
0
0
0
405
540
4,440
4,415
6,360
10,310
0
0
26,560
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
co
TOTAL
1969 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
PUERTO RICO
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
5
6
9
9
3
• 0
1
0
0
1
0
34
0
5
6
9
9
3
0
1
0
0
1
0
34
0.5
0
0
0
1
3
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
1.0
0
1
2
4
4
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
13
1 IN
1.2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
u. ur v
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
uanii i
1.6
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
N iiiC
l.fl
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
IBI EbUK
2.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
T V*K«I
2.5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
iu ur i
3.0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
1
0
0
0
C
0
0
0
0
0
I
4.0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
3
0
?
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
PUERTO PICO
TOTAL
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
5
7
IB
16
5
2
1
0
0
1
0
55
0
5
7
18
16
5
2
1
0
0
1
0
55
0.5
0
0
1
7
10
2
2
1
0
0
1
0
24
1.0
0
1
1
4
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
in
1.2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
u. ur r
1.4
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
L«™ 1 5 1
1.6
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
m SI ic
1.3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
{,n i cuun
2.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
T V=H«I
2.5
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
IU ur i
3.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.D
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
0
3
a
2
-------
RUN DATE 66/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PUERTO RICO
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
J,«UNARY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM
NO TREATMEN
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION
ro
00
01 SERVED COMM.
BELOW 50
500 -
1000 -
5000 -
10000 -
25000 -
50000 -
100000 -
250000 J
500000 AND
POPULATION
./FAC.
T
SERVED
/FAC.
0
999
4999
9999
24999
49999
99999
249999
499999
ABOVE
SERVED
1*
2*
3*
4*
5*
6*
7*
8*
9*
0*
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
4>
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
G
0
0
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
1
0
I
0
58660
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
c
10960
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
I
0
0
r
0
1
0
c
n
c
0
0
0
0
58660
0
58660
0
0
0
p
0
1096C
0
0
0
0
o
10960
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 66/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
RHODE ISLAND
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=600
500-1000
1&JG-2500
ro 25CO-500C
oo
-J 5COO-10COO
10000-25COO
25000-50COO
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>50COOO
TOTALS
TUTAL
* UF
PLANTS
1
0
0
0
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
7
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
1
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
C
0
0
6
101.260
0
0
0
It 480
7,600
18.600
58,850
0
0
0
0
187,790
TOTAL # OF POPULA- NO. OF
III OF COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
PLANTS IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
2
1
1
0
0
8
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
6
0
0
400
1,120
0
2,500
18,000
76,000
45,720
226,360
0
0
370,100
0
1
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
300
0
1,610
2,000
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
4,085
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—!l962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
RHODE ISLAND
ro
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNQVtN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
10
1
o
1
5
6
12
17
35
16
3
103
NUMBER
1
0
o
o
1
1
1
5
8
o
17
TOTAL
1,009,481
23, 631
10,215
788, 692
139,183
1,451, 156
5,622,758
14, 524, 262
2,287, 709
0
25,857,087
INTERCEPTORS
13,474
o
0
o
79, 522
17, 871
904,627
1, 161,175
3,301, 170
0
0
5,477,839
NUMBER
4
I
o
o
o
1
1
c
o
o
o
7
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
o
c
o
o
o
o
o
0
NEW PLANTS
105.443
23,631
o
o
p
26,800
2,305
o
o
c
o
158, 179
OUTFALL
0
0
o
o
0
o
o
o
Q
o
0
NUMBER
0
o
o
c
c
1
o
o
o
p
o
1
NUMBER
0
0
o
o
2
o
1
1
1
2
o
7
LAGOONS
C
0
o
o
0
11,135
o
n
o
o
c
11 , 135
MISCELLANEOUS
0
0
o
o
402,000
o
64,790
15,088
2,526,000
192,231
o
3,200,109
NUMBFR
2
o
o
o
o
o
o
1
1
3
o
7
NUMBER
3
0
0
1
2
3
10
25
11
o
64
REPL.t ADDS
7P4.4CO
o
g
0
o
ft
0
1 .665,000
2,237,903
1 ,190,853
o
5,878,156
SEWERS
1C6.164
o
o
10,215
307, 170
83,377
479,434
2 , 781 ,495
6,459,189
904,625
o
11.131.669
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1963 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
RHODE ISLAND
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
ro 500-1000
oo
<-0 1000-2500
3500-5000
500C-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
1
0
1
1
2
7
1
0
0
0
0
9
ff OF POPLH. A-
CQMMUNITIES TION
SERVEO
0
0
0
0
1
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
6
0
1 ,700
0
100.460
1,000
6,OflO
21,700
55,000
0
0
0
0
185,=40
T^TAl « OF PQPULA- NO. OF
ft OF COMMUNITIES TION COMM'JNI- POPULATION
PLANTS SERVED TIES SERVED
0
0
1
0
0
I
1
2
2
1
0
0
Q
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
?.
\
0
0
6
0
0
400
0
0
•?,370
18,100
60,400
SS.fiOO
214,000
0
0
3P4.070
0
1
0
3
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
«;
0
300
0
1.7RO
1,700
175
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,955
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1468 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
RHODE ISLAND
DESIGN LOADING / DOMFSTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGORY <-RATIO OF)
PRELIMINARY
COKH. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
ro
co
o
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
0
0
1
2
2
3
1
2
2
0
0
13
0
0
0
2
2
2
3
1
2
2
0
0
14
<«^
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
l.R
0
0
0
I
0
c
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
4
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
0
0
0
1
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
RHODE ISLAND
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
—————— i PIU. ur h-Lumis i m aitc IAICUUKT S=K«IIU ur»
COMM. NO. OF <*
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
ro
<5 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
2
0
1
2
2
3
1
2
2
0
0
15
0
2
0
2
2
2
3
1
2
2
0
0
16
0.5
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1.0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
1.2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.8
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
n
1
0
0
2
2.0
0
0
0
0
n
i
0
0
0
0 '
0
0
1
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.3
3
0
3
0
0
3
0
3
0
3
0
0
0
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
TABLE A-7A
RHODE ISLAND
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
CD SERVED COMM./FAC.
ro
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5+
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
6
*
1
0
1
0
58650
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3800
7
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
2
0
1
1
327620
6
1
1
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
120380
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
2
1
0
7
1
1
0
p
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
160110
226360
386470
0
160
500
0
0
42520
0
81000
0
0
0
124180
-------
TABLE A-8A
RHODE ISLAND
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
CI7E f\t PI APF
Unknown
^C $0fi-
500-1000
1000-2600
2500-6000
6000-10000
10000-26000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-260000
260000-500000
^•600000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oMater
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
1
1
1
1
Secondary
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
Primary
1
1
1
1
Secondary
1
1
1
1
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
2
2
2
2
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Dther
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
3
2
$
SCHEDULED
Pfft TKAt
1
3
1
$
CO
CO
CO
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-2A
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTH CAROLINA
SECONDARY
PRtLlMINARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1COO-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
25COOO-500000
>5000CO
TOTALS
TOTAL
« UF
PLANTS
0
10
5
52
23
10
3
3
0
0
0
0
106
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
C
6
5
31
12
4
2
2
0
C
0
0
62
0
1,925
4.C50
50,595
37,225
24,800
4,400
70,000
0
0
0
0
192,995
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
2
3
16
10
18
11
2
2
0
0
0
65
» OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SEKVtD
1
2
3
13
9
14
5
1
1
0
0
0
49
16,750
504
1,650
22,383
25,315
99,665
125,540
53,000
69)000
0
0
0
415,807
0
1
7
8
4
8
1
1
2
0
0
0
32
0
105
4,440
13,822
15,830
54,245
51,130
35,610
145,530
0
0
0
320,712
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
SOUTH CAROLINA
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
ro
^
1/1 POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
17
9
5
48
33
45
34
25
31
12
o
256
NUMBER
1
3
1
12
5
9
10
7
4
2
0
54
TOTAL
2,741,734
897, 153
392, 281
7, 22C, 301
2,958,356
6,701 ,287
7,747,329
7,203,842
6.97C ,277
2,500.622
o
45 ,333, 182
INTERCEPTORS
225,418
233, 561
40,938
1,323,032
596,964
1 ,517,236
2,764,07"'
2,919.900
2,245,832
779, 311
0
12,646,271
NUMBER
3
o
o
4
2
2
2
3
2
0
o
1 8
NUMBER
0
o
o
2
3
2
1
0
o
2
0
10
NEW PLANTS
1,342.565
o
o
2,243,706
206,609
902,553
310.793
1,875,484
354,91 5
c
o
7, 236,625
OUTFALL
0
0
o
367,196
395,168
351.421
66,686
0
0
842.997
0
2.023.47C
NUMBER
1
^
2
12
1 1
11
1
1
I
3
o
47
NUMBER
0
o
0
7
2
5
4
it
3
1
0
26
LAGOONS
50,000
216,349
93.548
1 ,098, 199
610, 594
1 ,182.409
390,659
17, '26
65,924
281 ,966
0
4,006, 874
MISCELLANEOUS
0
o
0
742.948
146,019
465,796
1,089,648
504,262
388,746
10.889
0
3,348,308
NUMBER
1
1
1
1
1
2
4
o
1
4
o
16
NUMBER
11
I
1
10
6
14
12
10
20
0
0
85
RDPL.E ADDS
21,600
87.243
1 1 "i. 0«i
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CENSUS
1»68 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTH CAROLINA
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
ro
CO
en
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
10
5
35
10
5
2
1
0
0
0
0
ft9
# OF POPULA-
CCMPUNITIES TION
SERVEO
1
6
5
18
3
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
38
10,000
1,925
5,050
33,603
14,015
13,325
3,150
2°, 000
0
0
0
0
110,068
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
2
5
9
42
32
34
17
5
2
0
0
0
148
• * OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVFO TIES SERVEO
2
5
6
28
20
18
7
2
1
0
0
0
89
1
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
ro
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTH CAROLINA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
C01M. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
11
16
46
14
15
11
1
1
0
0
0
115
0
38
30
63
20
17
13
2
1
0
0
0
184
0
C
0
3
I
1
0
0
c
0
0
r\
5
4.0
0
2
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
>4,0
0
2*
7
7
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
44
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTH CAROLINA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
--—-——-—---- trail, ur rLMOMa im 3l£C »««irvjUf*T v-*«iiu uri
COMM. NO. OF <»
SRVD PLANTS
ro
CO
00
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
17
20
55
14
16
12
1
1
0
0
0
136
0
52
36
75
20
18
14
2
1
0
0
0
218
0.5
0
1
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
1.0
0
26
25
48
14
12
9
0
0
0
0
0
134
1.2
0
5
3
5
2
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
21
1.4
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
1.6
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
5
1.8
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
2.5
0
0
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
3.0
0
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
3.5
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
1
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
>4.D
0
16
2
3
0
1
1
3
3
0
0
o
23
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
SOUTH CAROLINA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COHH./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION
ro
CO
SERVED COMM
SERVED
./FAC.
BELOW 503
500 -
1000 -
5000 -
10000 -
25000 -
50000 -
100000 -
250000 -
500000 AND
POPULATION
999
4999
9999
24999
49999
99999
249999
499999
ABOVE
SERVED
1*
2*
3*
4*
5*
6*
7*
8*
9*
0*
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
3
*
1
0
1
0
5COO
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1490
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
c
0
c
c
c
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
c
6
*
2
0
1
1
59000
2
0
b
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2766
7
*
1
0
0
1
57COO
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20CO
8
*
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
2
2
C
5
1
C
4
0
0
0
n
c
0
o
0
0
0
34000
870CC
121000
0
490
0
5786
0
0
0
r>
0
0
n
6276
-------
TABLE A-8A
SOUTH CAROLINA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
^^ 600
600-1000
1000-3600
2600-6000
EOQO-IOPQP
10000-25000
26000-50000
60000-000000
100000-260000
260000-500000
^•>600060
"Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oMater
Date not given
Total Project*
NEW
Primary
2
2
2
2
/ PLANT
Secondary
3
1
1
$
1
1
3
$
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
Primary
•
1
1
1
1
Secondary
2
1
1
I*
k
h
INTERCEPTORS
1
1
1
1
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfall
1
1
1
1
I*
1
3
li
Interception
Plant
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
3ther
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
k
3
1
6
i
2
1
18
^VFAL PNOACn
SCHEDULED
2
5
3
13
23
-------
TABLE A-2A
CD
RUN UATt 65000CO
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
15
15
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
36
# OF POPULA-
CuMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
15
15
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BV POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
SOUTH DAKOTA
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
3
25
21
17
16
16
33
4
24
0
3
159
TOTAL
26,143
898,374
913,085
772,233
517,542
1,174,590
3,051,835
3,525,893
1,591,996
0
0
12,471,691
NUMBER
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
c
0
5
NEW PLANTS NUMBER
0
30,764
0
C
0
634,515
437.000
2,788,580
0
0
C
3.890.859
0
10
7
3
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
25
LAGOONS
0
240,936
180.764
82.295
24.250
0
208.589
0
0
0
0
736,834
NUMBER
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
0
7
RFPL.fi ADDS
0
0
17,728
0
0
0
625.982
0
53,676
0
0
697,386
t.f)
0 POPULATION SIZE GROUP
ro
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
3
0
0
1
3
2
4
3
4
0
D
11
INTERCEPTORS
0
0
0
14,065
0
208,810
533,450
0
1,104,355
0
0
1.86C, 660
NUMBER
0
0
0
1
2
0
3
1
0
0
0
7
OUTFALL
0
0
0
27,858
108,776
0
449,431
729,851
C
0
0
1.315.916
NUMBER
1
4
9
6
2
1
5
0
2
0
0
30
MISCELLANEOUS
5,178
77,754
292,243
246,648
285.796
73,963
433,237
0
306,924
0
0
1.721.743
NUMRER
2
10
4
6
10
11
14
2
15
0
0
74
SEWERS
20,965
548,920
422,350
4C1.367
98,720
257,302
364.146
7,462
127,041
0
0
2.248.273
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTH DAKOTA
SECONDARY
M 0
PRELIMINARY
TRFftTMFNT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
w 1000-2500
O
CO 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
1?
o
?
2
I
t
0
0
n
T
0
?n
# OF
COMMUNITIES
0
13 4
a 5
2 2
2 6
1 10
1 10
0
0
0
0
0
28 40
POPULA-
TION
SFRVEO
0
,455
,770
,380
,900
,«00
,000
0
0
0
0
0
,305
TOTAL
H OF
PLANTS
1
hS
39
34
10
1
5
I
I
0
0
0
140
* OF
CCM^UNITIFS
1
fi«
39
34
!0
1
5
1
1
0
0
0
160
POPULA-
TION
SF.PVF.D
1 ,000
21,715
78.030
50,797
37,300
5,400
74,000
•42,300
70,000
0
0
0
331,44?
NO. OF
COMMUNI-
TIES
0
13
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
POPULATION
SF.RVFO
0
3,13?
6°0
1,070
4,100
ft, 000
0
0
0
0
0
0
14,<"=5
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTH DAKOTA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMH. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
CO
O
-C-
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
67
41
33
10
1
6
1
1
0
0
0
160
0
67
41
33
10
1
6
1
1
0
0
0
160
0.5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
1.0
0
14
11
11
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
41
ir
1.2
0
12
9
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
26
10. of f
1.4
0
7
11
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
'LANT5 !
1.6
0
14
1
1
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
20
IN SIZE
1.8
0
it
2
3
0
0
1
0
0
c
0
0
10
CATEGOF
2.0
0
5
2
I
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
9
[Y <«RAT
2.5
0
5
?
6
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
15
10 OH
3.0
0
2
2
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
7
3.5
0
1
0
I
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
4.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0.
0
0
0
0
1
>4.0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTH DAKOTA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
CO
O
tn
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
81
46
37
12
2
7
1
1
0
0
0
187
0
81
46
37
12
2
7
1
1
0
0
0
187
<*
0.5
0
9
4
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
19
1.0
0
66
40
28
11
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
150
IN
1.2
0
2
1
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
8
U. Ul- K
1.4
0
I
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
L ATM i 1
1.6
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
IX il£t
1.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
I
UA 1 tljUK
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T ^=KA
2.5
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
1 IU Ul-l
3.0
' 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.3
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
-------
RUN DATE 63/12/17
TABLE A-7A
SOUTH DAKOTA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTOR*
PRELIMINARY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
O BELOW 500 1*
CD
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
p
0
0
c
0
p
c
c
0
0
0
c
0
0
p
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
p
c
0
c
0
0
p
0
0
0
p
c
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
o
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
p
c
0
0
c
p
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
p
f>
f
n
0
0
p
p
c
0
0
-------
TABLE A-8A
SOUTH DAKOTA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE Of PLACE
Unknown
^C ifi°_.
600-1000
1000-2500
2500-6000
EOOO-10000
10000-2SOOO
26000-50000
Booob-Tboooo
100000-260000
260000-500000
>-500000
Total
_ INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1959
1970
1971
1972
1973 oMater
Date riot given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
2
k
1
7
k
1
2
7
i EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
"rim. to Sec
6
$
2
2
1
16
16
16
Primary
1
1
1
1
Secondary
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Pnos. Reduction
3ther
1
1
1
1
NUMBER Of
CQMMUNirKS
2
11
6
2
3
1
25
fftTAi fnAJICTI
•CHIOULIO
n* YIAI
u
19
2
25
CO
o
-a
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TENNESSEE
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-5CO
500-1000
O 1COO-2500
CD
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50COO
50COO-100000
1COOOO-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
0
2
4
14
11
3
4
2
0
2
0
0
42
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNlTIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
2
4
14
10
3
4
2
0
1
0
0
40
0
170
2,210
20,655
27,550
15,950
45,550
69,000
0
131,000
0
0
312,085
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
1
4
19
15
17
11
0
0
3
0
0
70
« OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
1
4
19
15
17
11
C
0
2
0
0
69
0
285
1,910
28,032
46,895
108,065
121,200
0
0
280,975
0
0
587,362
0
2
2
8
5
3
1
1
0
0
1
0
23
0
3ao
1,281
10,370
16,460
16,780
13,200
23,000
C
0
497,525
0
578,996
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SUE GROUP--1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
TENNESSEE
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
250.000 AND OVER.. .......
W POPULATION SIZE GROUP
CO ™~ — — ™-^_— „— _,
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
1 t 000-2*500. .............
TOTAL
NUMBER
30
13
32
60
41
43
82
24
o
152
109
586
NUMBER
1
1
I,
12
6
6
5
1
0
6
7
52
TOTAL
2,579,641
1,442, 678
4,127,203
8.542. 748
7,658, 114
10,244, 019
19.784.046
6,275, 187
o
54,027,737
10, 845, 730
125,527,103
INTERCEPTORS
746,210
IOC, 129
319,255
1,825,653
482,005
985. 783
1,921,049
648,802
0
6,469,500
3 , 73 7 , 5 94
17.235,980
NUMBER
15
2
8
14
8
5
ft
2
0
5
3
68
NUMBER
1
0
1
2
t,
0
4
3
0
0
g
23
NEW PLANTS
821.334
546,000
1 ,084,600
2,289,606
2,326,083
1,702 ,694
4.765.3P7
1,989 ,905
o
2,505,973
670,363
18,701,865
OUTFALL
26,103
0
43,384
25,796
628,730
0
1,398,097
635,674
C
0
215,400
2,973,184
NUMBER
2
3
4
5
2
0
0
o
o
o
0
16
NUMBER
1
0
2
6
3
3
1
1
0
2
1
20
LAGOONS
47,345
84,100
219,447
147.650
256,175
0
0
o
o
0
o
754.717
MISCELLANEOUS
22.352
0
108,100
784,477
479,806
232,854
581.900
194,317
0
431,900
683.206
3,518,912
NUMBFR
2
1
1
2
2
6
4
1
0
5
0
24
NUMBER
8
6
10
19
16
23
61
16
0
134
90
383
REPL.t ADOS
38,590
169.665
159,522
109,639
517,604
1,857,232
1 ,890,682
911,229
0
8,584,976
0
14,239.189
SEWERS
877,707
542,784
2,192,895
3,359,877
2,967,711
5,465,456
9,227,011
1,895,260
0
36,035,388
5,539,167
68.103.256
-------
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4A
i<>68 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TENNESSEE
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
OO
*-* 2500-50130
O
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
o np
PL4NTS
I
3
4
11
f>
I
4
3
0
3
0
0
36
# OF POPULA-
COMHUMTIES TION
SERVER
0
3
4
10
5
1
4
2
0
1
0
0
30
1,100
?,090
3,450
15,645
15,100
6,?00
51), 300
87,000
0
175,430
0
0
365,315
TDTAL
# HP
PLANTS
13
7
25
35
30
27
14
3
0
6
1
0
161
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- "1PUIATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
4
7
71
33
??
22
11
2
0
1
0
0
12'
22,350
3,170
?0,26<5
67,640
«*5,875
179,315
10S.064
?7,000
0
461,870
1,000
0
1,086,540
0
1
3
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
14
0
205
2,111
9,405
9,800
0
0
0
0
0
4-97,525
0
519,046
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TENNESSEE
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGORY <=RATIO OF)
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SftVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
14
11
52
24
27
18
4
0
2
1
0
153
0
16
19
66
27
28
22
4
0
2
1
0
185
<»
0.5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0
0
4
2
7
4
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
22
1.2
0
0
2
9
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12
1.4
0
1
1
5
1
5
4
2
0
0
0
0
19
1.6
0
1
0
17
2
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
26
1.8
0
1
it
3
2
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
15
2.0
0
2
2
4
3
5
2
1
0
1
0
0
20
2.5
0
1
4
9
4
5
1
1
0
0
1
0
26
3.0
0
3
2
3
5
0
?
0
0
1
0
0
16
3.5
0
0
0
4
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
4.0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
>4.0
0
3
2
3
1
4
2
0
0
c
0
0
15
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
ro
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TENNESSEE
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2900
2500-5000
9000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
COM*. N
SRVO P
0
15
11
56
24
27
19
4
0
2
1
0
159
0. OF
LANTS
0
18
22
70
27
28
23
4
0
2
1
0
195
0.5
0
5
6
10
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
23
1.0
0
6
6
35
11
10
7
1
0
1
0
0
77
i r
1.2
0
1
6
4
6
4
4
2
0
0
0
0
27
»u. ur r
1.4
0
1
1
7
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
'L«m i » i
1.6
0
2
0
2
2
5
2
0
0
1
0
0
14
"i ai ic
1.8
0
0
1
4
0
2
2
1
0
0
1
0
11
(,« i r\»ur
2.0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
*T N»r^MI
2.5
0
0
0
2
3
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
11
i u ur v
3.0
0
1
0
1
i
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
3.5
0
1
0
2
0
•0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4.0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
>4.0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
3
0
3
0
0
4
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRFLIMINARY
TENNESSEE
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
CDM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 24*9999 a*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
c
c
0
0
0
c
c
c
c
o
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
. 0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
*
1
0
0
1
92000
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
10365
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
6
0
1
c
1
o
r>
0
c
1
c
0
c
c
0
0
0
p
0
92COO
9?oor
c
0
r\
0
0
1C365
0
0
0
n
0
10365
-------
TABLE A-8A
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
«< . §S_P
600-1000
1000-2600
2600-6000
BOOO-100QP
10000-26000
26000-60000
60000-100000
100000-260000
260000-600000
>600050
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oFlater
Date not given
Total Projects
NEV
Primary
^ PLANT
Secondary
10
1
3
1U
2
1
2
2
7
lit
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sac
Primary
1
1
1
1
Secondary
1
5
2
3
1
1
13
1
h
8
13
INTERCEPTORS
1
1
1
1
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
1
2
1
3
1
8
8
8
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Other
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
11
1
9
3
6
2
1
33
TOT/U MOJICTT
SCHEDULED
2
1
3
6
25
37
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TEXAS
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
50C-1000
CO
I-1 1000-2500
tn
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
5COOO-100000
1COOOO-250000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
C
13
34
50
11
4
2
0
1
1
0
0
116
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNIT1ES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
13
34
47
11
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
IK
0
4,340
18.701
53,205
37,405
16,800
10,800
0
48,300
300
0
0
169,851
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
45
15
69
165
138
75
72
27
13
10
5
75
709
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNt- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
6
15
65
161
117
70
56
16
9
6
2
3
526
65,760
4,723
43,180
224,327
359,170
448,576
739,735
466,000
599,400
798,600
554,600
2,071,230
6,375,301
0
0
2
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
1,325
2,300
6,870
9,000
17,500
0
0
0
0
C
36,995
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
TEXAS
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
GJ _
M POPULATION SIZE GROUP
CD
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
26
62
84
131
66
65
114
Bl
46
166
553
1*434
NUMBER
3
6
4
12
4
5
5
6
1
12
28
86
TOTAL
1,945.358
3,209,797
6,201 , 698
10,427, 631
flt 125,671
12,854, 378
14,017*330
14,620*481
10,290*946
21,645*317
82,474, 508
165*813* 115
INTERCEPTORS
181,341
289* 865
306*811
1*128, 345
271, 179
1*192*663
1,127,293
2*055*618
317.704
3,584,299
15*783* 841
26.240.959
NUMBER
0
14
19
27
15
13
T
5
8
10
14
132
NUMBER
1
3
7
12
9
7
7
6
4
6
8
70
NEW PLANTS
0
603,685
1 ,399*210
2.64C.435
1* 745*785
3*036.426
2.102,098
2.238.145
3.639*438
4.475.848
6.997,740
28,929,010
OUTFALL
373,233
87,605
593,879
93C.331
1,048,831
1 ,016,869
1,529,269
950,036
2,374,095
1,183,859
1 ,780,998
11,869,005
NUMBER
1
3
2
1
1
2
o
o
o
o
If
14
NUMBER
0
6
16
16
s
9
6
0
2
7
14
64
LAGOONS
10.275
60,231
84.108
1,695
129, 527
112,589
0
o
o
o
8QQ.703
1,294,128
MISCELLANEOUS
0
315.702
1,159,059
1.362.236
1,110,034
3,360,495
1,771,954
0
86,694
1,590,467
2,607,883
13,564,524
NUMBER
4
1
8
17
7
5
12
9
4
6
27
100
NUMBER
17
29
28
46
42
44
77
55
27
125
458
948
REPL.C ADDS
309, B52
128,770
343. 105
1,226,914
1,204,975
692,114
1,333,864
4,802,911
854,011
1,40?. 180
B, 302, 554
20,691.250
SEWERS
1,070,657
1 ,723,739
2,308,526
3,137,675
2,615,340
3,443,222
6,152,852
4,523,771
3,019,004
9,318,664
45,910,789
83,224,239
-------
TABLE A-4A
CENSUS
PRIMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TEXAS
SECONDARY
N 0
PRF.L IMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
?
11
25
27
o
5
1
3
0
0
0
0
83
# OF PDPULA-
CCMMUNITIFS TION
SERVED
1
11
25
24
<3
5
1
1
0
0
0
0
77
2,500
1,490
21,451
26,7*0
32,205
31,000
10,300
12,900
0
0
0
0
140,606
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
60
31
R4
199
146
RO
76
25
15
18
10
51
P04
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUMTIFS TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
25
•>o
PO
IPS
110
67
52
16
10
6
1
*
594
611 ,565
14,773
56,255
2fl3, P65
427,075
508,756
8^9,000
691,100
678,700
a96,700
628,000
2.44f ,050
8,201 ,879
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
200
0
flOO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
1,000
-------
TABLE A-5A
RON DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
00
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TEXAS
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
66
136
220
115
78
58
12
17
9
4
2
717
0
89
152
268
141
100
69
17
19
9
4
2
870
0.5
0
6
2
28
20
8
4
3
3
4
0
1
79
1.0
0
19
43
80
49
35
27
9
5
2
1
0
270
t r
1.2
0
2
21
30
19
16
10
3
2
1
0
0
104
iu. ur r
1.4
0
4
11
31
21
8
4
1
6
I
0
1
88
•uanii I
1.6
0
3
18
14
4
8
6
0
1
0
0
0
54
IN *ILC
1.8
0
8
9
19
3
5
*
1
1
0
0
0
52
l,A t CVJUP
2.0
0
6
7
10
8
5
7
0
0
0
0
0
43
IT ^»KH1
2.5
0
3
16
20
6
7
1
0
0
0
c
0
53
iu ur i
3.0
0
13
11
8
3
4
2
0
0
1
1
0
43
3.5
0
7
0
9
3
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
?2
4.0
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
7
>4.0
0
l»
11
16
5
3
1
0
0
0
1
0
55
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
TEXAS
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM, NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
1 00000-2 50000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
71
137
220
115
78
58
13
17
10
4
2
725
0
95
154
268
142
100
69
18
19
10
4
2
681
<*
0.5
0
30
23
38
24
15
7
2
3
3
0
1
146
1.0
0
53
103
186
102
6Z
43
11
11
3
2
1
577
i r
1.2
0
1
10
13
8
11
9
2
2
2
1
0
59
iu. ur i
1.4
0
1
4
7
3
4
5
2
3
2
1
0
32
'Lorn a I
1.6
0
0
5
4
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
14
in a i ic
1.9
0
2
1
S
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
15
\~ H 1 C VUr
2.0
0
1
2
1
0
1
1
0
\
0
0
0
0
6
T ^=K«I
2.5
0
1
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
I u j r i
3.0
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
>4.3
0
4
5
7
2
2
I
0
3
0
3
3
21
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
TEXAS
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVFO
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NtJ TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
CO
ro
0 SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
2
0
0
2
9200
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7000
5
*
4
0
C
4
565CC
3
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
c
n
c
8855
6
*
1
0
0
1
42300
1
C
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2000
7
*
1
0
0
1
1 00000
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2230
8
*
6
0
0
6
1917100
18
2
0
6
3
4
3
0
0
0
0
192160
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
14
0
£
14
0
26
2
2
1C
5
4
3
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
2125100
2125100
0
400
1320
15030
35535
47460
112500
n
0
0
0
212245
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 6d/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
UTAH
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
TOTAL # UF POPULA-
# UF COMMUNITIES T10N
PLANTS IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
UNKNOWN
<=50C
500-1000
CO
(\) 1000-2500
i__k
1
2500-5000
5000-10000
1000C-25000
250CO-50COO
500CO-100000
100000-250000
250000-50COCO
>500COO
TOTALS
0
10
c
7
2
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
19
0
9
0
7
2
0
C
0
0
0
0
c
18
0
2,640
C
10,350
7,180
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20,170
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
8
1
1
5
8
8
4
1
0
0
C
0
36
HI OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COM MUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
5
1
1
5
8
7
3
1
C
0
0
0
31
2*1,100
350
755
8,440
27,290
63,860
63,080
40,000
0
0
0
0
4^,875
0
2
7
7
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
20
0
520
4,065
5,790
0
12,030
18,730
0
C
189,455
0
0
230,590
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY
POPULATION SUE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
250.000 AND OVER..
POPULATION SIZE
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 0
GROUP— 1962 - 196T CONTRACT
TOTAL
0
13i886
32C.843
1,836,218
1,588,114
1,568.487
2.361.920
IT, 237
468,652
11,408,961
0
19.584,318
NUMBER
0
0
0
3
1
1
0
0
0
3
0
8
AWARDS
NEW PLANTS
0
0
C
645,879
51,954
347,169
0
0
0
6,653,516
0
7,698,518
NUMBER
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
u
LAGOONS
0
0
0
99,684
0
0
769,956
0
0
0
0
369,640
T A H
NUMBER
0
1
0
1
2
5
3
I
0
5
0
18
REPL.C ADDS
0
13.886
0
294,792
284,018
440.967
330,460
17,237
0
979,475
0
2,360.835
OJ POPULATION SIZE
ro
ro ~
UNKNOWN POPULATION
250*000 AND OVER..
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 0
4
INTERCEPTORS
0
0
0
61,384
0
182,498
853,567
0
C
0
0
1.117,449
NUMBER
0
0
0
2
3
3
1
0
3
4
0
16
OUTFALL
0
C
0
74,320
272, 5CC
238.918
182,118
C
415,913
1,511,298
0
2,695,067
NUMBER
0
0
1
4
1
3
1
0
0
0
0
10
MISCELLANEOUS
0
0
121,952
299.654
582,885
171.156
86,433
0
0
0
0
1,262.080
NUMBER
0
0
1
3
3
3
2
0
1
12
0
25
SEWERS
0
0
198,891
340,505
396,757
187,779
139,^86
0
52,739
2,264,672
C
3,580,729
-------
I960 CENSUS
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
UTAH
PRIMARY SECONDARY
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
CO
ro
CO
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
7
3
6
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
tfi
tt OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIFS TION
SERVED
0
7
2
6
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
1,9?0
1,220
6,510
8,700
6,345
0
0
0
0
0
0
24,695
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
4
10
7
7
4
1
0
I
0
0
43
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
6
0
4
10
7
6
3
r
0
1
0
0
38
273,910
0
2,345
17,420
26,080
79,190
71,140
55,000
0
198.000
0
0
723,085
0
5
6
4
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
0
650
2.R40
2,470
0
11,930
0
0
0
0
0
0
17.P90
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
UTAH
DESIGN LOADING / OOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
^3 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
2
1
10
8
9
8
1
4
1
0
1
45
0
2
1
10
9
9
8
1
4
1
0
1
46
0.5
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1.0
0
0
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
I n
1.2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
:u. UP r
1.4
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
l_an|l 3 1
1.6
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
IN S I if
1.8
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
1
1
c
0
c
5
IA 1 CbUK
2.0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
T ^=KAI
2.5
0
0
0
3
0
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
8
1U lir i
3.0
0
0
0
1
1
2
C
0
0
0
0
0
4
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
0
0
1
?.
\
1
0
1
0
0
0
(,
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1966 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
UTAH
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
-—————--——-- »nu. ur rL«nii IIM iitc I.BICUUHT v*n«iiu jri
COMH. NO. OF <«
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
r$ 5000-10000
en
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
9
5
13
8
9
8
1
4
1
0
1
59
0
9
5
13
9
9
8
1
4
1
0
1
60
0.5
0
7
4
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
1.0
0
2
0
3
3
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
12
1.2
0
0
0
2
1
3
2
1
1
0
0
0
10
1.4
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
1.6
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
1.8
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
2.0
0
0
0
2
2
1
1
-0
1
0
0
0
7
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.0
3
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
3
0
3
3
0
D
0
3
0
3
3
0
3
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
-------
TABLE A-8A
UTAH
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
^C 6PJ>-
500-1000
1000- /BOO
2600-5000
EOOO-10000
10000-25000
26000-60000
ebobb-lboboo
100000-260000
250000-5COOOO
^•500000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 oMater
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
1
3
3
2
9
9
9
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
Primary
1
1
1
1
Secondary
1
2
3
1
1
8
8
8
INTERCEPTORS
^
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfall
1
1
1
1
Interception
1
1
1
1
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Other
NUMBER OF
CQMJVIUNiriES
2
3
k
h
2
3
1
1
20
W»L moJipn
SCHEDULED
ft* TCAI
20
20
CO
CO
-------
RUN DATE 68/13/17
1960 CENSUS
TABLE A-2A
1962 MUNICIPAL riASTE INVENTORY
VERMONT
PRIMARY SECONDARY
PRELIMINARY
N 0
TREATMtNT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
OJ
1X3 1000-2500
CD
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
500.00-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>5COOOO
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
2
3
C
3
0
1
2
i
0
0
0
0
13
n
OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
1DENT
2
3
0
2
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
11
1FIABLE SERVED
2,500
1,005
0
6,310
C
8,000
20,387
28,200
0
C
0
0
66,402
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
Q
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
* OF
COMMUNITIES
IDENTIF1AULE
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
POPULA-
TION
SERVED
0
0
0
0
0
8,500
0
0
0
0
0
C
8,500
NO. OF
COMMUNI-
TIES
1
3
5
16
*
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
35
POPULATION
SEKVtU
500
1,200
2,625
1
22,580
15,350
32,000
28,000
9,000
0
C
0
0
111,255
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
VERMONT
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
OJ
l^> POPULATION SIZE GROUP
GO
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
1
17
8
10
xi
14
10
7
o
0
o
78
NUMBER
0
5
2
4
5
6
5
4
0
0
o
31
TOTAL
17,467
3,272, 146
1»43H» 171
2 ,936,749
4,051,413
5,695, 188
2,852, 519
739, 383
o
o
o
21,003,036
INTERCEPTORS
C
1 ,41C,819
323,938
1,052, 175
1 ,814,20C
1,864, 843
1,006, 101
223,577
0
0
o
7,704,653
NUMBER
0
4
4
4
3
3
2
1
0
o
o
21
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
o
o
1
o
o
o
o
1
NEW PLANTS
0
778,543
704,910
1,734,169
1 ,372,740
1 ,395,541
1 ,293,903
442,470
o
0
c
7,722 ,276
OUTFALL
0
o
0
o
o
o
427,275
0
o
o
c
427,275
NUMBER
0
1
0
o
c
o
o
o
o
o
o
1
NUMBER
0
2
1
c
3
1
0
o
0
0
o
7
LAGOONS
0
409,430
0
o
o
o
o
0
o
o
o
409,430
MISCELLANEOUS
0
394,136
136,745
0
864,473
27,450
0
o
o
0
o
1,427.804
NUMBER
1
o
0
0
o
2
o
o
o
o
o
3
NUMBER
0
5
1
2
0
2
2
2
0
0
o
14
REPL.C ADDS
17,467
o
C
c
o
1 ,164,825
c
0
c
0
c
1,182,292
SEWERS
0
265,216
272,578
150,405
o
1 ,242, 5?9
125,240
73,336
0
0
o
2,129.306
-------
1960 CENSUS
TABLE A-4A
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
VERMONT
SECONDARY
PRELIMINARY
NO TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-?500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10030-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
3
?
7
3
3
4
3
0
0
0
0
31
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
t
3
1
5
3
7
4
1
0
0
0
0
25
500
3,420
4AO
9,770
10,800
4?, 000
46,110
34,400
0
0
0
0
147,480
TOTAL 0 OF POPULA- NO, OF
# OF COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
PLANTS SERVED TIES SERVED
0
0
1
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
1
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
650
5,750
0
9,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
15,400
1
12
17
?3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
54
1,100
4,890
6,955
22,245
2,500
10,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
47,690
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
VERMONT
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
CO 2500-5000
CO
^ 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
5
4
8
5
8
3
0
0
0
0
0
33
0
5
5
8
6
10
3
0
0
0
0
0
37
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
in
1.2
0
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
U. UP f
1.4
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
LANIi I
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
N » 1 Lt
1.8
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
LBI EbUK
2.0
0
1
0
2
0
0
^0
0
0
0
0
0
3
T »;«(4.0
0
1
0
0
2
2
0
0
c
0
0
0
5
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
VERMONT
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF O
SRVD PLANTS
CO
CO
ro
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
> 500000
TOTALS
0
6
4
8
5
8
3
0
0
0
0
0
34
0
6
5
8
6
10
3
0
0
0
0
0
38
0.5
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1.0
0
4
2
3
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
1.2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
u. ur r
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
L«ni i j i
1.6
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
"1 31 «.C
1.8
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
V-« 1 CVMK
2.0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
T N"H**I
2.5
0
0
0
I
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
I if \jr 9
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
1
0
a
0
i
3
0
0
3
0
3
Z
-------
RUN DATE 66/12/17
PRELIMINARY
OJ
OJ
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500
500 - 999
1000 - 4999
5000 - 9999
10000 - 2*999
25000 - 49999
50000 - 99999
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
TABLE A-7A
VERMONT
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
1*
2»
3*
4*
5*
6*
7*
8*
9*
0*
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
3
*
1
1
0
0
2500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
c
0
0
c
o
0
0
0
c
c
0
0
0
c
c
13
c
6
*
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
0
0
0
C!
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
n
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
n
0
0
*
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
1
1
c
r
n
0
0
n
f
c
n
0
0
r
o
. c
0
0
2500
0
0
2500
0
0
0
0
0
r
0
0
0
r
0
0
-------
TABLE A-2A
CO
RUN DATE 68/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
VIRGINIA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100COO-2 50000
250COO-500000
>5COOOO
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
5
9
14
16
7
9
3
2
1
2
1
0
69
# Of POPULA-
CUMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
3
9
14
14
7
9
3
2
1
2
1
0
65
308,300
2,271
9,518
21,222
17,660
62,385
41,660
82,000
55,000
280,000
200,000
0
1,080,016
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
15
13
11
23
14
7
16
2
2
0
3
0
106
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SEkVEU
7
12
10
22
13
6
8
1
2
C
0
C
81
30,660
2,259
6,778
35,552
40,945
49,750
158,282
29,427
200,000
0
17,400
0
571,053
1
12
15
16
6
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
53
1,500
3,375
11,151
26,006
16,040
5,500
20,400
0
0
185,000
0
0
268,972
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE 6Y POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS VIRGINIA
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
4
tii
CO POPULATION SIZE GROUP
cn
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
27
26
33
42
55
i
53
24
254
137
143
836
NUMBER
1
1
8
9
g
10
15
22
22
15
115
TOTAL
1,728,531
2,703,468
3,231,646
6,573,782
7, 319,753
10,404, 779
10,296,310
3,034,122
21 ,046,775
25,669, 771
22,664,497
114,673,434
INTERCEPTORS
24,900
66, 684
882, 574
1,485,838
1 ,187,567
1,515, 189
5,066,135
540,587
4, 185.88°
7,406,032
4,653, 150
27,014,545
NUMBER
5
5
7
5
2
1
3
7
2
3
44
NUMBER
0
1
1
0
o
2
1
o
2
1
1
9
NEW PLANTS
540.142
1,005,189
650,078
1,370,635
1,840,886
3,735,738
190,000
739,249
3,450,619
2,237,425
8,006,487
23,766,448
OUTFALL
0
39,500
5,900
0
0
835,280
50,000
c
43,382
99,926
101,583
1,175,571
NUMBER
1
7
4
3
5
4
I
6
0
0
35
NUMBER
3
5
3
6
7
10
6
0
14
20
10
84
LAGOONS
11.933
167,343
504,936
212,519
601,223
435,754
152,321
32,500
645,248
0
0
2,763,777
MISCELLANEOUS
64.609
526.431
213.957
296.962
1,182,323
1 ,303,801
872,600
0
789,744
2,681, 206
376.628
8.308,261
NUMBER
4
0
2
4
2
0
2
0
4
6
3
27
NUMBER
13
11
7
12
17
26
24
16
199
86
111
522
REPL.C AODS
255.698
0
61,900
919,845
377.748
0
1.000.357
0
669.662
6.072.861
1,172.381
10.530.452
SEWERS
831,249
898,321
912,301
2,287,983
2,130,006
2,579,017
2 ,964,897
1,721,786
11,262,231
7,172,321
8,354,?68
41,114,380
-------
TABLE A-4A
Co
l=>60 CENSUS
? h I M A
MUNICIPAL WASTT INVFNTO«Y
VIRGINIA
SECONDARY
N 0
PRFLfMINAPY
TREATMFNT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
7500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL 0 OF PflPULA-
# OF COMMUNITICi TION
PLANTS SERVED
7 1 615,600
8 0 ',010
1? 13 10.0R5
16 15 24,619
5 •> 14,545
10 •* 5", 010
4 » 49,7*5
1 1 48,000
1 1 55,000
•J 2 376,550
0 0 0
0 ' 0 0
65 58 1,255,204
TOTAL
PLANTS
66
15
??
?7
22
11
9
3
0
2
0
0
1*4
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TIHN COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TI£S SFRVFO
?0
n
10
24
17
o
fl
?
0
•>
0
0
124
136, 5«0
15,4«?5
ia.325
46,427
72,235
101,725
142,000
77,000
0
?91,02?
0
0
900, P10
0
7
R
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
21
0
3.R95
4,055
10,551
0
0
240
0
0
0
0
0
18,741
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTOR*
VIRGINIA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGORY <«RATIO OF)
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
OJ 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
32
34
46
30
19
15
4
4
3
1
0
183
0
48
43
60
39
22
19
4
4
4
1
0
244
0.5
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
5
1.0
0
6
7
10
8
6
1
1
0
2
0
0
41
1.2
0
3
3
7
9
5
3
0
0
2
0
0
32
1.4
0
3
10
14
5
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
38
1.6
0
4
6
6
6
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
28
1.8
0
2
3
q
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
18
2.0
0
4
3
1
3
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
17
2.5
0
6
3
•5
1
2
3
C
0
0
1
0
21
3.0
0
1
3
2
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
11
3.5
0
3
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
7
4.0
0
3
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
>4.0
0
10
5
3
2
0
0
1
0
0
C
0
21
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
VIRGINIA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMH. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
CO
CO
00
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
33
34
46
30
19
15
4
4
3
1
0
189
0
49
43
60
39
22
19
4
4
4
1
0
245
<«
0.5
0
6
9
4
1
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
26
1.0
0
13
11
25
18
9
8
4
I
4
1
0
94
1 I1
1.2
0
5
2
8
5
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
27
iu« LIT r
1.4
0
1
6
7
8
2
4
0
1
0
0
0
29
U **"* 1 J I
1.6
0
2
3
3
4
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
14
1* *t A C. L.
1.8
0
1
2
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
\* w i L, V7 1. ' r
2.C
0
4
3
1
0
1
1
P
0
0
0
0
10
2.5
0
4
2
3
0
1
0
0
I
0
0
0
11
3.0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
3
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
4.0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
>4.0
0
9
4
3
0
3
.0
3
0
0
0
0
16
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
VIRGINIA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL S
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
CO ~ ~ ~
CO
"* SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
1000 0 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
I
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
1
1
0
0
600
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3660
4
*
1
0
1
0
5000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
50CO
6
*
1
0
1
0
37000
\
1
0
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3000
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
78000
8
*
3
0
3
0
480000
6
1
0
1
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
119475
9
*
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
5
0
c
10
1
c
4
0
3
0
1
1
c
0
c
0
600
522000
0
522600
0
160
C
13785
0
45190
0
72000
78COO
0
0
209135
-------
TABLE A-8A
VIRGINIA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
^C 60°
600-1000
1000-2600
2500-6000
6000-10000
10000-25000
25000-60000
60000-100000
100000-260000
250000-6COOOO
2>600000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 or later
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
2
1
3
2
1
3
Secondary
h
i
i
i
7
1
6
7
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec.
2
2
1
2
1
1
9
1
1
1
6
9
Primary
2
1
1
1
5
l
k
5
Secondary
1
1
2
h
2
2
h
INTERCEPTORS
7
2
2
2
3
1
1
2
1
21
21
21
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
2
3
2
1
2
2
1
13
13
13
Outfall
Interception
1
1
2
2
2
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Dther
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
13
7
5 .
6
6
5
5
1
1
3
1
53
TCiAk PROJVvn
ICHtDULIP
PM HAI
1
1
1
10
51
61*
-------
TABLE A-4A
CO
I960 CENSUS
MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
VIRGIN ISLANDS
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMFNT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
25000 0-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITfFS TinN
SFRVED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOTAL # OF
# OF CCMMUMTIFS
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
POPULA- NO. OF
TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SFRVFD TIES SERVED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
3,215
0
7,553
21,000
0
0
0
0
0
31,768
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
VIRGIN ISLANDS
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SUE CATEGORY <«RATIO OF)
COHM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
CO
•f
ro
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<-
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.6
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.P
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
VIRGIN ISLANDS
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
--———- I NU. Ur PLANI5 IN »I£t CAItbUKY ^=K»IIl> Uf 1
COMM. NO. OF <-
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
^ 5000-10000
CJ
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
V
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*.o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>
-------
CO
RUN DATE 68/12/17
1960 CfcNSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-2A
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WASHINGTON
SECONDARY
PRELIMINARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-5000C
50000-100000
1COOOO-2 50000
250000-500000
>50COOO
TOTALS
TOTAL
# Of-
PLANTS
4
13
19
20
7
7
8
5
0
2
0
3
88
# OF POPULA-
CUMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
4
11
17
18
5
7
8
4
0
2
0
1
77
30,200
3,145
11,770
29,585
19,025
57,700
121,000
145,000
0
210,000
0
71,000
698,425
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
10
15
17
25
20
7
6
2
0
0
0
2
104
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
10
15
16
24
20
7
6
1
0
0
0
0
99
22,980
4,290
26,745
34,930
53,655
48,400
103,300
41,000
0
0
0
53,730
389,030
1
6
11
9
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
33
150
1,525
6,250
12,050
3,100
12,000
11,800
700
0
60,000
0
433,300
540,675
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
WASHINGTON
cn
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
1 ,000-2 , 500 ..............
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
2 , 500-5,000. .............
10,000-25,000. ...........
50,000—100 ,000 ...........
100.000-250,000. .........
NUMBER
31
20
17
91
55
80
149
57
0
83
167
750
NUMBER
2
2
1
10
5
6
1C
o
2
27
84
TOTAL
2,346,299
2,34<3»642
1,302,937
17,485,352
7,233,835
15,20 1,888
34,882, 109
7, 177,081
0
6,647,682
78 , 102,036
172, 728, 861
INTERCEPTORS
388, SCO
135,463
194, 690
5,120,731
455, 174
1,371, 897
12,535,933
2, 173, 851
o
430, 737
40, 504, 521
63,311,497
NUMBER
C
4
3
8
4
3
2
o
0
2
2
28
NUMBER
0
1
1
3
4
3
2
0
o
3
18
NEW PLANTS
0
307, 002
228,150
1 ,678,064
1,209,678
567,343
9,554,373
0
C
2,302,530
12,513,000
28,360,140
OUTFALL
0
14,825
13,098
462,457
444, 3C2
276,888
259,235
0
o
70,557
1,920,872
3,462,234
NUMBER
1
6
3
2
4
1
1
0
C
1
1
20
NUMBER
3
1
1
4
7
10
14
4
0
0
17
61
LAGOONS
160,226
212,139
52,248
286,218
716,240
348,800
128,474
0
0
2,808
95,230
2,002.383
MISCELLANEOUS
435,600
80,625
154,014
326.745
939,113
1 ,559,776
1,102.049
492.514
0
0
7,737,612
12.828.C48
NUMBER
2
0
1
4
8
4
q
4
0
2
14
48
NUMBER
23
6
7
60
23
53
102
39
0
75
103
491
REPL.t ADDS
26,307
0
114,342
208,101
1.2C4.251
778,827
816,427
1 ,457,913
C
77,574
1.638,122
6,321,fi64
SEWERS
1,335,666
1 ,599,588
546,395
9,403,036
2,265,077
10.298,357
10,485,618
3,052.803
0
3,763,476
13,692,679
56,442,695
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVFNTORY
WASHINGTON
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
J*L 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
8
15
12
19
7
•9
7
4
0
1
0
•1
0
82
* OF POPULA-
CflNMUNITIES TION
SERVCD
4
10
12
18
6
9
7
3
0
1
0
0
70
172,500
427,712
9,025
32,450
18,715
70,700
m.ioo
115,000
0
184,500
0
0
1,158,702
TDTAL
# OF
PLANTS
8
21
28
29
22
5
7
2
0
1
0
0
123
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
CCMMUMTIFS TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
«5
21
28
28
?1
5
7
2
0
1
0
0
118
142,660
5,864
23,120
41,555
70,355
33,490
134,370
8ft, 000
0
"0,000
0
0
627,414
1
2
5
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
450
450
2,930
4,715
0
5,000
0
0
0
60,000
0
0
73,545
-------
TABLE A-SA
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
WASHINGTON
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COHM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
14
23
51
22
12
15
6
2
2
1
1
149
0
15
25
51
23
12
17
7
3
2
1
I
157
0.5
0
1
1
2
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
7
1.0
0
4
3
6
4
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
21
(r
1.2
0
2
0
4
I
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
9
«u« ui- t
1.4
0
2
2
5
1
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
14
'LAIN 15 1
1.6
0
1
3
5
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
16
IN blit
1.8
0
2
2
9
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
18
i. A i etiui
2.0
0
1
2
5
0
1
\.
3
0
0
0
0
0
12
4.0
0
1
2
6
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
13
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
CO
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WASHINGTON
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COHM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
1 00000-2 50000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
29
32
59
24
14
15
7
3
2
1
1
167
0
30
35
60
26
14
16
8
4
2
I
1
199
0.5
0
22
24
21
4
1
3
2
0
0
0
1
78
1.0
0
4
3
13
6
4
5
2
1
0
0
0
38
» r
1.2
0
2
2
6
8
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
24
III* ur- r
1.4
0
1
1
7
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
15
mra i a i
1.6
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
1
I
1
1
0
9
n a l LC
1.8
0
0
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
VM 1 CUUn
2.0
0
0
2
1
0
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
7
If X «»\M 1
2.5
0
0
1
4
2
0
Z
1
0
0
0
0
10
A U L» r- f
3.0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
t.o
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
>4.3
0
3
3
3
1
1
3
0
3
3
3
3
5
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
to
TABLE A-7A
WASHINGTON
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
1000 - 4999 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVED
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
3
*
1
1
0
0
1000
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
300
4
2
0
I
I
27700
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
12420
5
3
0
1
2
590CC
9
2
1
4
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
39995
6
*
0
0
0
0
c
0
\
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
1
0
1
0
90000
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3500
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
1
3
3
0
13
3
1
6
1
2
0
0
0
r
0
0
0
1000
127000
49700
177700
0
1050
765
19590
1000C
24810
0
0
0
0
0
56215
-------
TABLE A-8A
WASKNOTOM
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACIUT1ES
en
O
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
^^ 600
600-1000
1000-ZBOO
2600-5000
6000-10000
10000-25000
25000-60000
60000-100000
100000-260000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 or later
Date not given
Total Projecta
NEW
Primary
1
1
1
3
1
1
1
3
/ PLANT
Secondary
2
3
1
6
2
k
2
6
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sac
2
2
k
6
2
k
h
3
1
28
$
16
1
It
28
Primary
1
1
1
1
Secondary
2
1
3
2
It
1.
1
lii
2
3
5
2
2
lii
INTERCEPTORS
1
1
2
2
1
1
2
3
13
h
3
$
i
13
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
7
5
1
lli
6
7
7
U
3
60
h
V
28
$
8
60
Outfall
6
3
6
10
k
k
3
3
2
111
It
10
21
2
3
1
111
Interception
1
1
1
1
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Dther
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
9
5
11
lit
9
8
7
3
1
2
1
70
m«L p«6jiCT
ICHEDULID
1?
1|D
80
10
18
3
167
-------
TABLE A-2A
cn
RUN DATE 66/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
WEST VIRGINIA
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10.1,00-25000
25000-50000
50COC-100000
1COCOO-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
1
2
11
7
5
4
1
1
0
0
0
32
# OF POPULA-
CUMMJNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
C
1
2
11
7
5
3
1
1
0
C
0
31
0
345
975
13,975
20,700
31,300
44,640
40,000
50,000
0
0
0
201,935
TOTAL
# CJF
PLANTS
0
1
2
3
1
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
14
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COHMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
1
2
3
1
2
3
1
0
0
0
0
13
0
325
900
4,100
1,800
15,135
45,000
25,000
0
0
0
0
92,260
0
17
30
51
16
7
2
2
2
0
0
0
127
0
6,7t>tt
19,847
69,115
43,775
39,481
34,000
45,000
174,000
0
0
0
431,936
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
WEST VIRGINIA
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
to __________________________
01 POPULATION SIZE GROUP
ro
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
3
3
33
76
27
13
18
14
38
1
5
231
NUMBER
0
1
6
24
8
2
3
1
13
0
2
60
TOTAL
173,158
1,687, 329
2,889,196
8,041, 590
4, 258,684
2,135,697
7,701, 171
1,202,313
11,091,263
189,000
1,550,473
40,919,874
INTERCEPTORS
0
195, 541
1,282,594
2, 76 7, 855
1, 562,273
625,485
1,150,820
46, 148
3,416,804
0
999,330
12,046,850
NUMBER
2
1
&
19
7
2
3
I
1
o
2
44
NUMBER
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
0
NEW PLANTS
126,402
390,146
631,925
2,800,201
1,428,094
561 ,129
3,451,443
11,600
2,364,310
p
389,933
12,155,183
OUTFALL
0
o
0
o
o
o
o
c
o
o
o
0
NUMBER
0
o
7
5
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
12
NUMBER
0
o
6
7
6
2
1
1
7
0
0
30
LAGOONS
0
0
239,673
334,376
o
o
o
o
0
0
0
574,049
MISCELLANEOUS
0
o
208,708
448,989
978,348
531,374
248, 598
72,701
2,582,126
0
0
5,070,844
NUMBER
0
0
0
2
0
o
2
0
I
o
0
5
NUMBER
1
1
8
19
6
7
9
11
16
1
1
80
RFPL.C ADDS
0
C
0
319,002
0
0
1,113,679
0
556,087
0
0
1,988,768
SEWERS
46,756
1,101,642
526,296
1,371,167
289,06''
417,709
1,736,631
1.071,864
2.171,936
169,000
161,210
9,084,180
-------
TABLE A-4A
CO
1960 CFNSUS
PRIMARY
1168 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WEST VIRGINIA
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-1 00000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
0
l
5
18
10
a
7
7
3
0
0
0
55
# OF POPULA-
COUMUNIT1FS TION
SERVED
0
1
4
18
10
8
5
?
3
0
0
0
51
0
345
4,390
34,975
37,375
54,950
107,040
71,000
229,200
0
0
0
538, 275
TOTAL # OF POPULA- NO. OF
H OF COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
PLANTS SERVED TIES SERVED
q
1
14
20
fl
3
it
0
0
0
0
0
59
6
1
14
If
8
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
54
17,500
325
11,620
31,245
25,500
25,078
53,180
0
0
0
0
0
165,348
0
17
22
26
5
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
75
0
6,770
14,467
33,670
12,575
18,781
0
48,000
40,000
0
0
0
174,263
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
WEST VIRGINIA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING R4TIO
COMM. NO. OF <-
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
OJ 10000-25000
in
•** 25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-5 00000
>500000
TOTALS
0
2
10
31
20
11
6
3
3
0
0
0
86
0
3
10
34
20
11
7
3
3
0
0
0
91
0.5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
a
0
1
1.0
0
0
0
4
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
1.2
0
0
0
3
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
7
1' I • y r c
1.4
0
0
0
»7
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
12
'\. «fN 1 9 1
1.6
0
0
1
4
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
HI 3 I LC
1.8
0
0
2
C
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
c
t*M I CVUK
2.0
0
0
1
4
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
8
LT V»K« 1
2.5
0
C
2
5
4
1
1
0
0
C
0
c
13
I » i ur i
3.0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
3.5
0
1
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
4.0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
c
0
c
u
>4.0
0
2
2
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
8
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WEST VIRGINIA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF <-
SRVD PLANTS
CO
C/1
cn
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
2
11
33
22
14
7
3
3
0
0
0
95
0
3
11
36
23
14
8
3
3
0
0
0
101
0.5
0
0
0
10
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
1.0
0
1
2
9
11
10
2
2
1
0
0
0
38
1.2
0
0
3
3
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
iu. ur Y
1.4
0
0
1
6
2
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
13
L »ni « a |
1.6
0
0
2
2
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
7
"1 3 1 1C
1.8
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
\-M t CV7UH
2.0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
T S.-H H t
2.5
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
IV ur >
3.3
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.0
0
1
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
PRELIMINARY
TABLE A-7A
WEST VIRGINIA
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
SERVED COMM./FAC.
CJ BELOW 500
cn
CD 500 - 999
1000 - 4999
5000 - 9999
10000 - 24999
25000 - 49999
50000 - 99999
100000 - 249999
250000 - 499999
500000 AND ABOVE
POPULATION SERVED
1*
2*
3*
4*
5*
6*
7*
8*
9*
0*
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
*
0
c
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3000
4
*
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
2
0
I
1
27820
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
700
6
*
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
2
C
1
1
0
2
0
C
2
C
0
p
o
0
0
r
r
p
0
9320
18500
2782P
0
0
f»
37Cn
C
f\
r
p
c
P
P
370C
-------
TABLE A-8A
WEST VIRGINIA
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
600000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 or later
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
lit
1U
17
15
$
3
2
70
5
3
ho
22
70
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
1
1
k
1$
9
8
6
1
3
liB
1
3
1
16
27
liB
Primary
Secondary
6
1
5
h
2
18
1
10
7
18
INTERCEPTORS
2
^
2
2
2
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
1
1
2
1
1
2
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Other
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
19
16
25
36
16
10
6
3
3
13k
TOTAl MOJ1CT1
SCHEDULED
9
k
66
5b
11*0
CO
en
-------
TABLE A-2A
RUN DATE 68/12/17
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WISCONSIN
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
OJ
01 2500-50CO
CO
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50COO- 100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
20
34
31
9
3
8
8
2
0
0
0
115
* OF POPULA-
COHMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
20
33
29
8
3
8
8
2
0
C
0
111
0
6,205
23,245
42,410
25,523
17,685
121,420
323,832
163,000
0
0
0
723,320
TOTAL
« Of
PLANTS
5
31
73
85
35
28
7
4
2
0
0
0
270
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
4
31
72
85
35
27
7
4
0
0
0
0
265
1,056,490
10,798
191,695
129,207
126,321
184,484
92,205
142,625
3,400
0
0
0
1,937,225
0
I
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
150
2,585
425
4,110
0
0
0
500
0
0
0
7,770
-------
TABLE A-SA
CO
cn
CO
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 16
GROUP— 1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
TOTAL
497,179
8,814,604
5,335,835
6,849,836
9,448,769
17,067,334
17,489,980
14,501,399
16,832,806
9,171,318
74,301,111
180,310,171
NUMBER
1
25
9
10
2
5
2
1
1
0
0
56
NEW PLANTS
21,000
1,899,744
1,080,701
1,739,625
747,046
5.179,278
203,735
73,017
2,430
0
0
10,946,576
NUMBER
0
13
12
I
0
1
2
2
0
0
0
31
wise
0 N S I
LAGOONS NUMBER
0
402,012
396,237
13,984
0
18,149
39,510
87,150
0
0
0
957,042
1
2
4
11
15
11
17
14
3
3
3
84
N
REPL.S Anns
155,290
196,575
226,830
1.253,208
2.848,018
1.635,043
4,541,937
5,702,910
2.633,078
2,420.266
100,172
21,713,327
POPULATION SIZE
UNKNOWN POPULATION
GROUP NUMBER
SIZE.. 0
INTERCEPTORS
0
237,306
280,283
595,418
3,214,131
4,164,009
1,206,121
3,244,537
3,017,256
3,100,669
43,585,436
62764 5T 166
NUMBER
2
5
3
1
1
1
2
1
0
1
1
18
OUTFALL
51,071
89,851
90.338
29,415
1,675
64,546
100,566
6,051
0
36,804
1.720,000
2,190,317
NUMBER
1
5
9
3
3
3
2
2
3
2
0
33
MISCELLANEOUS
26,279
119,400
465.654
138.949
207,309
288,759
32,800
50 , 564
3,534,193
1,012,756
0
5,376,663 1.
NUMBER
11
55
31
67
71
118
118
132
123
66
279
071
SEWERS
243,539
5,869,716
2,795,792
3,079.237
2,430,590
5,717,550
11,365,311
5,337,170
7,645,849
2,600,823
28,895,503
75,981.080
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CENSUS
P R I
1068 MUNICIPAL WASTF. INVFNTORY
WISCONSIN
ARY SFCONDARY
N 0
PPFLIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-3500
2500-5000
CO
CT> 5000-10000
0
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-5 COOOO
>5 00000
TOT4LS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
20
36
20
9
6
•>
6
0
0
0
0
101
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIF.S TION
SERVED
0
20
35
19
7
6
5
6
0
0
0
0
S8
0
6, SOT
25,985
30,645
26,743
31,985
66,515
248,535
0
0
0
0
439, ?15
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
4
57
pq
97
33
?<9
10
6
4
0
0
0
?35
(K OF POPULA- NO. OF
CCWUNITIFS TICN COMWJN1- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
3
57
87
07
3°
2°
10
h
2
0
0
0
330
1,104, 4BO
21,176
?62,°6?
145,455
14?,
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
en
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WISCONSIN
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-5COOOO
>500000
TOTALS
0
88
119
108
47
34
14
10
6
1
0
1
428
0
89
119
108
47
34
14
10
6
1
0
1
429
O
0.5
0
3
4
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
11
1.0
0
7
25
22
5
b
1
0
0
0
0
0
66
I r
1.2
0
9
14
11
7
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
46
4.0
0
e
3
i
i
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
14
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WISCONSIN
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COHM. NO. OF <«
SRVD PLANTS
CO
O1
ro
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
91
122
108
47
34
14
10
6
1
0
1
434
0
93
122
108
47
34
14
10
6
1
0
1
436
0.5
0
14
16
5
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
38
1.0
0
33
46
45
18
12
1
1
0
0
0
0
156
1.2
0
9
13
18
7
8
2
0
0
1
0
0
58
DU. ur t
1.4
0
9
13
9
6
5
5
1
0
0
0
0
48
•LAIN 1 d 1
1.6
0
4
13
5
4
5
1
4
0
0
0
0
36
"1 »ICC
1.8
0
5
5
4
4
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
20
\fH I CV»ur
2.0
0
3
3
1
4
2
1
1
2
0
0
1
18
IT V*HAI
2.5
0
a
7
7
3
1
1
1
2
0
0
0
30
i u ur i
3.0
0
1
I
6
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
3.5
0
0
2
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
4.0
0
0
1
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
>4.0
0
7
2
3
3
0
3
3
0
3
0
3
12
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
PRELIMINARY
WISCONSIN
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1Q62 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTOR*
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION
SERVED
•.0
SERVED COMM./FAC.
OJ
BELOW 500
500 -
1000 -
5000 -
10000 -
25000 -
50000 -
100000 -
250000 -
500000 AND
POPULATION
999
4999
9999
2*999
49999
99999
249999
499999
ABOVE
SERVED
1*
2*
3*
4*
5*
6*
7*
8*
<>*
0*
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
205
2
*
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
8
1
2
5
22397
8
2
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7295
4
*
2
0
0
2
13540
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
780
5
*
4
c
3
1
7C905
5
1
1
2
0
1
C
C
0
c
c
15241
6
*
2
0
2
0
89682
5
v o
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10397
7
»
3
0
2
1
251280
8
1
0
4
1
1
0
1
0
0
o
92438
8
*
2
0
0
2
1110950
24
1
1
7
4
7
0
2
1
0
1
1111775
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
21
1
9
11
0
53
6
5
23
5
9
0
3
1
0
1
C
0
41 1C
311642
124300?
1558754
0
1485
294"
43980
37360
101492
0
184480
126385
0
740000
1238131
-------
TABLE A-8A
WISCONSIN
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
<< 600
600-1000
1000-2600
2600-6000
6000-10000
10000-26000
26000-60000
60000-100000
100000-260000
260000-600000
>600000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 or later
Date not given
Total Protects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sac.
6
k
2
2
Ih
3
11
lii
Primary
Secondary
1
1
1
1
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
2
1
5
6
k
3
2
I
1
25
22
3
2$
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Other
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
2
1
10
10
h
t
2
h
1
39
TOTAL MOJICTI
SCHEDULED
22
3
Ik
1
W
-------
TABLE A-2A
cn
RUN OATt 68/12/17
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WYOMING
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1COO-25CO
2500-5000
5000-10000
1COOO-25000
25000-50000
50COO-100000
1COOOO-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# UF
PLANTS
0
1
3
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
9
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
1
3
1
2
0
1
1
C
0
0
c
9
0
125
1,450
1,440
9,000
0
11,500
39,000
0
0
0
0
62,515
TOTAL
* OF '
PLANTS
0
18
a
11
8
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
51
* OF POPUtA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVcU
0
16
8
11
6
3
2
1
C
0
0
0
51
0
4,710
5,910
17,180
31,475
19,645
28,000
43,505
0
0
0
0
150,425
0
7
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
0
1,760
545
3,530
3,500
C
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,335
-------
TABLE A-3A
TOTAL SEWERAGE BY POPULATION SIZE GROUP—1962 - 1967 CONTRACT AWARDS
CD
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
POPULATION SIZE GROUP
UNKNOWN POPULATION SIZE..
NUMBER
0
2
1
3
3
o
4
4
0
0
o
17
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
2
0
0
o
2
TOTAL
0
25, 771
45, 563
248,284
134,540
o
148,544
0
0
o
1,553,043
INTERCEPTORS
0
o
o
o
o
o
51,677
0
0
0
o
51.677
NUMBER
0
o
o
1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
1
NUMBER
0
o
o
1
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
1
NEW PLANTS
0
o
o
172,580
o
o
o
0
o
o
172,580
OUTFALL
0
c
o
17,400
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
17,400
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
(1
A
NUMBER
0
2
I
1
1
0
0
o
o
o
o
5
LAGOONS
0
o
o
13
ff
o
o
o
o
o
MISCELLANEOUS
0
25,771
45, 563
58,304
108,547
0
o
0
o
o
o
238.185
NUMBER
0
o
o
o
g
o
i
2
o
o
c
3
NUMBER
0
Q
o
o
2
1
2
o
0
o
5
REPL.C ADOS
0
o
o
o
o
77Q-7OO
72.660
o
o
801. 860
SEWERS
0
25,993
Q
169.464
75,884
o
0
o
271.341
-------
TABLE A-4A
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTF INVFNTORY
WYOMING
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
2
3
•>
7
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
10
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNIT1ES TION
SERVED
0
2
3
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
10
0
525
It750
2,440
9,000
0
0
39,000
0
0
0
0
52,715
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
26
11
12
a
•3
3
1
0
0
0
0
64
# OF POPULA- NO. DF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUN1- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SF.RVFD
0
25
11
12
9
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
63
0
11,680
8,045
20,58-5
31,045
l°,645
45,'iOO
50,000
0
0
0
0
193,500
0
4
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
790
545
1,500
3,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6,335
-------
TABLE A-5A
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WYOMING
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
CO
CT>
CO
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
8
5
4
4
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
25
0
8
5
4
it
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
25
<«
0.5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
z
1 '11
1.2
0
2
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
Lf » \jr~ r 1
1.4
0
0
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
k»*'l I •? H<
1.6
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
5
i* 4 I *,*,
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
W* ( t WVJFV
2.0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
i ^ — r\ r* i
2.5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
-------
TABLE A-6A
RUN DATE 69/02/10
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENT3KY
WYOMING
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COM*. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
CO
CD
CO
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
13
9
7
5
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
40
0
13
9
7
5
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
40
0.5
0
6
5
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
1.0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
5
1 IM
1.2
0
2
1
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
u. ui- r
1.4
0
0
2
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
LAN 15 I
1.6
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
m 51 it
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LAI tbUH
2.0
0
1
0
0
0
0
-0
0
0
0
0
0
1
;T ^=KAI
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
IU UH
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.D
0
2
1
3
0
3
0
0
0
0
3
0
3
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/17
TABLE A-7A
WYOMING
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
PRELIMINARY
TOTALS
COM./FAC. POPULATION
SERVED
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION
CO
-J
O SERVED COMM.
SERVED
/FAC.
BELOW 500
500 -
1000 -
5000 -
10000 -
25000 -
50000 -
100000 -
250000 -
500000 AND
POPULATION
999
4999
9999
24999
49999
99999
249999
499999
ABOVE
SERVED
I*
2*
3*
4*
5*
6*
7*
8*
9*
0*
1
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
z
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
*
1
0
1
0
4100
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
280
4
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
c
c
0
0
0
0
6
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
8
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
*
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
*
0
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
c
c
I
1
c
p
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
n
4100
o
4100
0
280
1*
p
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
280
-------
TABLE A-8A
WYOMING
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS SUMMARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE FACILITIES
SIZE OF PLACE
Unknown
<<£ 500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
^>500000
Total
INDICATED
COMPLETION DATE
1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973 or later
Date not given
Total Projects
NEW PLANT
Primary
Secondary
k
1
2
7
1
1
5
7
EXPANSION/UPGRADING/REPLACEMENT
Prim, to Sec
1
1
2
1
1
2
Primary
Secondary
1
1
2
1
1
2
INTERCEPTORS
ANCILLARY IMPROVEMENTS
Disinfection
Outfall
Interception
Plant
TERTIARY TREATMENT
Phos. Reduction
Dther
NUMBER OF
COMMUNITIES
k
1
2
1
1
1
1
11
T6T.L p»6JMTI
ICHEDULED
FEU ri*4
2
2
7
11
CO
-------
MAJOR RIVER BASIN TABLES
373
339-S7* 0-69-25
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATE 68/12/16
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
19ft? MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NORTHEAST
SECONDARY
N 0
TRF.ATMF.NT
UNKNOWN
O509
500-1000
1000-250?
2500-5010
5000-10030
10000-250CO
25000-50900
50COG-1000CO
1000 30-2 50COO
250COO-500GOO
>5 00003
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
33
12
26
54
79
57
56
35
ia
14
3
5
392
« OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIF.S TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVEO
24
12
25
48
61
49
47
23
1C
B
2
2
311
2,941,540
3,785
22,575
87,100
l"2,715
280, 026
715,167
848,657
651,015
1,587,7?4
522,875
766,200
P, 613,379
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
40
9
16
39
41
58
55
28
6
3
1
11
306
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
CDHMUNITIFS TION COMMUMI-
IDENTIFIABLE SFRVEO TIPS
25
fl
13
36
3?
47
4ft
10
6
?
0
c
236
654,465
2.545
0,015
62,195
92,090
248,128
615,450
573,535
296,720
399,360
91,915
6,634,000
9,679,418
7
17
40
127
68
51
38
11
8
3
0
1
370
POPULATION
SERVF.O
848, 70n
4,555
25,734
150,313
183,300
219,540
531,995
322,410
553,985
325,760
11,3<»0
1,787,400
4,965,07?
-------
TABLE A-4B
PPFI
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTF 1NVFNTORV
NORTHEAST
SFCPNDARY
N 0
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
CO 2500-5000
071 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
56
14
31
66
82
80
78
37
n
13
3
4
475
in OF POPDLA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SFRVFO
39
13
29
57
63
66
61
24
11
7
1
2
373
2,273,510
22,360
24,400
122,326
254,550
1,293,650
974,38'!
869,030
700,490
1,884,000
674,000
706,600
9,799,301
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
79
15
17
62
61
93
81
4?
11
•i
0
11
477
# OF PPPULA- MO. OF
COMMIJK'ITIFS TION rOMMUNI- PDPUliTTON
SPRVFO TIPS SPPVF"
40 1,42", "50 !? ??3,195
S 14,375 ?4 I.O*-"!
16 ll,o«n ,0 ?«,,,4
6^ l'Z.799 125 T4',"5
54 164,670 61 f',635
73 468, «C9 44 019,^45
5P 709,165 ?•> 3*3,MIi
21 641,505 7 ?51,?!0
7 36?, =75 7 4*4, ^o^
3 7??,?CO 4 37*,?ftO
000"
0 6,791,000 ! l,'5''5,oni
349 11,4?U,oB8 ?*P 4,444,100
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
NORTHEAST
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COM*. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
to 5000-10000
CD 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
63
66
141
135
123
99
46
23
14
5
5
720
0
107
92
170
150
137
114
51
28
18
a
11
886
0.5
0
4
7
9
9
8
8
4
1
2
1
0
53
1.0
0
29
15
34
29
26
12
8
4
2
0
1
160
( r
1.2
0
8
9
14
20
12
14
4
1
2
0
0
84
«u« ur F
1.4
0
10
13
21
14
11
16
5
2
0
1
0
93
;L n"t i i i
1.6
0
4
8
12
13
13
15
5
1
1
1
2
75
irv i lie
1.8
0
6
2
13
14
11
11
5
3
1
0
1
67
IA t etju
2.0
0
6
6
12
3
12
5
6
4
2
1
4
61
KT *«KAI
2.5
0
6
11
16
18
18
17
7
6
3
3
2
107
i u jr i
3.0
3
1
3
11
5
10
8
4
1
3
1
1
48
3.5
0
3
4
9
4
2
5
2
1
1
0
0
31
4.0
0
6
2
7
10
5
2
1
1
0
0
0
34
>4.0
0
24
12
12
11
»
1
3
3
1
0
3
73
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMIN«RY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NORTHEAST
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
71
TO
152
143
12,
1
1
C
0
C
0
C
16
>4.0
C
21
p
c
5
7
1
0
C
0
0
n
52
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/20
TABLE A-7B
NftRTHFAST
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1°62 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVFNTOPV
TOTAI s
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION
CO
CD
SERVER COM*
SERVED
./FAC.
BELOH 500 1*
500 -
noo -
5000 -
1000C -
25000 -
50000 -
100000 -
250000 -
500000 AND
POPULATION
999 2*
4999 3*
9999 4*
24999 5*
49999 6*
99999 « 7*
249999 8*
499999 9*
ABOVE 0*
SERVEO
1
2
1
1
1
585
2
2
1
1
3
0
1
1
1
0
0
635
2 3
1 14
P 3
i a
n 3
70" 43015
1 3"
1 IS
<• "5
« 5
" 2
0 P
0 n
n P
C C
n o
0 0
2^ 17067
4
*
13
0
7
6
91475 t
3?
13
6
7
5
1
0
0
0
0
1
61044 •
5
*
7
7
10
USSrc
40
5
4.
17
3
P
1
2
r
C
0
J08451
6
*
1"
f
6
4
340?5"-
21
4
I
5
3
5
2
1
0
p
p
17B32P
7 R
* *
16 21
3 5
R 12
5 4
1K9295 63B346Q
33 ?3B
5 12
7 11
1" 2R
* 41
4 75
2 41
" ?2
•« 5
p ^
,
137527 477270°
a "
* *
0 " =6
« 1 14 1*ori!P5
1 " 40 54166?°
"1-33 148474S
" »'0»3T«
» ^ ^07 r
0 " 6^ 14134
" ? 34 ?37fl?
0 ^ 72 15°665
« r 50 ^60125
P * 031 APQP -*p
f 0 46 122513"
?5 14?P?4°
r « 5 5?o7flp
p i •> 71ff>45
P
n " r «;47c;psi
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATE 68/12/16
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NORTH ATLANTIC
SECONDARY
N 0
TRFATMFNT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
^j 1000-2500
U>
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250COO-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
10
13
17
47
25
35
20
2
4
3
1
5
182
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
7
13
17
42
24
27
20
2
4
3
1
0
160
638,720
4,638
12,351
68,971
82,280
184,550
271,335
82,000
352,000
400,000
200,000
2,229,500
4,526,545
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
31
20
28
59
67
63
60
13
9
3
3
5
361
* OF POPULA- NO. (IF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI-
IOENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES
19
17
27
55
55
39
11
7
2
0
3
300
348,825
6,909
19,723
98.PP1
257,705
354,015
722.972
399,012
602,200
275, ?80
17,400
3,522,470
6.625,312
1
16
35
62
33
28
12
1
0
2
0
0
1°0
POPULATION
SERVED
1.500
5,320
?6,056
98,660
108,045
178,120
190,360
32, 155
68,000
314,000
0
n
1,022,116
-------
TABLE A-4B
I960 CENSUS
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NORTH ATLANTIC
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
TR
PBEt IMINAOY
A T M f
CO
00
o
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
27
15
20
47
26
34
23
1
3
4
0
0
200
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
14
15
20
44
25
29
20
1
3
2
0
0
173
3,153,012
5,615
15,690
82,*32
97,470
210,320
314,285
45,000
262,000
496,550
0
0
4,683,674
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
111
40
47
no
76
68
46
16
10
4
0
3
501
* CF PDPULA- NO. HF
COMMUNITIES TIPN COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIE? «5CRVED
68 830,784
33 74.R05
45 46,170
78 152, 62"
71 301, 14"
62 435, *00
42 727,015
15 579,365
o 0*7,000
4 5*2, 02»
0 0
2 3,
'0 -!(»,04>>
.n 7«.'>»S
30 Qa,?R5
1 n 11 q,7B5
1? 171,010
n o
0 M.0»0
1 170.000
0 o
0 0
l^Q ?>Q 0 • " f- ^
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NORTH ATLANTIC
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
CJ 2500-5000
CD
•"* 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
64
65
144
101
89
67
26
14
10
2
1
583
0
78
72
155
113
98
74
26
14
11
2
2
645
0.5
0
3
4
10
12
9
3
0
1
0
0
0
42
1.0
0
12
11
13
16
24
8
6
4
3
0
0
97
\ r
1.2
0
7
8
11
16
12
8
3
2
2
0
0
69
YU. UP t
1.4
0
7
11
32
17
9
12
3
1
0
0
0
92
'LAWIS 1
1.6
0
8
7
19
16
13
10
4
0
1
0
2
80
[IN Site
1.8
0
4
5
14
8
6
4
1
2
1
1
0
46
ini ri»UK
2.C
0
6
4
9
12
6
4
3
1
0
0
49
T ^»KA
2.5
0
7
4
12
4
8
10
1
1
2
1
0
50
i lu uri
3.0
0
2
2
10
5
7
3
3
0
0
0
0
32
3.5
0
1
4
5
3
3
8
0
0
0
0
0
24
4.0
0
2
0
4
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
a
>4.0
3
19
12
16
4
2
1
1
0
1
3
0
5i
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
NORTH ATLANTIC
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
CO
CO
ro
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>5 00000
TOTALS
0
69
65
152
110
93
69
27
15
11
2
3
616
0
84
74
165
122
104
78
27
15
12
2
5
688
<-
0.5
0
10
13
24
16
15
4
2
1
1
0
0
86
1.0
0
21
21
44
42
43
31
8
7
6
1
1
225
ir
1.2
0
8
6
18
13
15
12
7
3
0
0
1
83
jo. OF P
1.4
0
7
7
21
20
9
11
2
1
1
0
2
81
'LANTS 1
1.6
0
5
7
8
10
10
4
4
1
1
0
1
51
IN SIZE
1.8
0
3
4
0
6
5
0
0
0
1
1
0
29
CATEGOR
2.0
0
5
1
3
3
0
3
3
1
0
0
0
19
;Y <«RAI
2.5
0
6
?
13
7
4
5
0
1
1
C
0
39
IU UM
3.0
0
2
0
5
2
2
4
1
0
1
0
0
17
3.5
0
1
3
6
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
14
4.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
>4.0
0
16
10
13
2
0
1
0
0
n
0
C
42
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/20
TABLE A-7B
NORTH ATI.ANTTC
JOINT TOFATMFNT FACILITIFS
1=6? MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SERVING COMM
./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION
CD
CO
SERVFO COMM.
SPRVfO
/FAC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 -
1100 -
5000 -
10JOP -
25010 -
50100 -
100000 -
25POOO -
50POOO AND
POPULATION
P9° 2*
4909 3*
9999 4*
24199 5*
49099 6+
93999 7*
749949 ft*
499993 d*
ABOVE C*
SERVEO
1
*
1
•J
I
0
18C?
1
1
T
''
0
T
•1
0
0
0
T
900
2 ' 4
* * *
1 1? 14
r " 4
I 4 (,
p o 4
2— 8CV»r 11*755 <
1 12 23
1 1 A
I 2 2
^76
P 1 "»
p r* -^
" 1 3
r r •)
n
fl A A
? P 0
745 41074 1T1553 ;
5 A
* *
15 11
5 ^
« 1
A in
.577?-5 4f40PP t
42 13
1 "
5
17 4
Q 6
7 1
? ?
1 "
r -!
r
r ?
>T?47<( OR97- :
7 p 0
* * *
IP i? P
1.1 *
3 f> f
* 5
'2**"< 670647''
4P 77 P
? 4 *
45^
12 74 P
o T« P
11 ?" "
* 4 n
1 7 "
1 •> ^
P p A
•> n p
>2H3" °R5i>14 P
p
p 77 p
11 -12*1-*
*! 2fi 33«3«?'>
P. 4" 477?P1^
R470«i4r
P 7 • e r
p f 35?^
•> jo i ijr 70
" 7r 1778""1
** 47 ?R<;o56
" 4? 4<=5745
1? 2074-6
= 566' B5
P 1 7RPTP
n
p p r
r - l°!2f(.4
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATE 68/12/16
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTHEAST
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
C-503
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25COO-50000
50000-100000
100COO-250000
250000-500000
>5000CO
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
7
39
74
202
130
39
19
11
6
7
5
0
509
* OF PPPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
4
24
65
160
75
26
14
7
4
2
2
0
383
476,660
10,065
39,802
19B,042
207,730
133,250
131,870
240,160
216,250
402,900
822,845
0
2,879,574
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
10
55
51
133
12?
130
9«
36
1?
16
9
0
642
* OF PHPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION C.OMMUNI-
IOENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES
7
22
30
ei
79
76
53
22
8
5
1
0
384
173,390
14,939
30,302
168,527
303,195
527,463
749,175
727.450
541,300
557,715
474,500
0
4,267,956
1
10
23
R2
55
40
19
9
4
4
0
C
247
POPULATION
SERVEO
2PO
2,545
12,090
106, 3P2
16B.143
225,262
299,55*
267,010
331,830
452,475
n
n
1,865,487
-------
TABLE A-4B
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
i<»68 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTHEAST
SECONDARY
N 0
IMINSRY
TREATMFNT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
^ 1000-2500
Sn 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OP
PLANTS
28
26
59
116
59
30
19
8
6
6
4
0
361
# OF POPULA- TOTAL
COMMUNITIES TIHN « OF
SERVED PLANTS
12
20
51
86
41
21
14
5
3
2
2
0
257
792,876
8,180
35,710
124,351
134,075
766,175
164,760
207,100
244,050
321,400
724,575
0
3,023,272
20*!
46
109
256
204
163
149
68
60
24
29
0
1,313
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TltlN COMMUNI- PHPUI 4TION
SERVED TIES SERVE"
117 6?8,17'5
•i a y a f. o ,330
4 !4^o^n
P 151,600
1 1^,0*0
0 4,600
P 0
1?° 1,116, ^5P
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTHEAST
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
U> 5000-10000
00
<*> 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
COMM. h
SRVO F
0
115
170
280
130
120
100
27
17
6
3
0
96B
10. OF
'LANTS
0
305
266
407
180
120
37
23
8
3
0
1496
0.5
0
9
10
17
4
2
5
0
0
1
1
0
49
1.0
0
40
52
57
32
21
17
7
5
0
1
0
232
(1
1.2
0
27
31
31
22
13
11
2
0
0
1
0
138
NO. OF
1.4
0
19
25
47
21
16
12
6
1
0
0
0
147
PLANTS
1.6
0
15
29
41
22
24
14
6
4
1
0
0
156
IN SIZE
1.8
0
9
17
30
17
16
12
4
6
1
0
0
112
CATEGDI
2.0
0
21
IB
35
12
15
10
3
1
2
0
0
117
KY <»RAT
2.5
0
23
24
65
20
17
7
4
6
2
0
0
168
in urt
3.0
0
15
17
18
12
9
14
4
0
1
0
0
90
3.5
0
11
14
13
4
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
48
4.0
0
12
7
12
3
5
7
1
0
0
0
0
47
>4.3
0
104
22
41
11
6
3
0
3
3
0
3
192
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTHEAST
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
££ 2500-5000
~"1 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
COMM. N
SRVD P
0
153
197
322
138
126
104
29
17
6
3
0
1095
10. OF
'LANTS
0
363
306
463
189
156
129
39
23
8
3
0
1679
0.5
0
77
63
77
31
18
20
5
0
1
1
0
293
1.0
0
140
158
230
96
71
49
9
12
0
1
0
766
1 1
1.2
0
21
14
22
16
18
20
11
6
1
0
0
129
«U« ur r
1.4
0
12
10
16
9
11
9
1
1
3
0
0
72
PL Am i 3 i
1.6
0
13
10
12
8
9
6
3
3
3
1
0
70
in aiLC
1.8
0
6
11
13
4
2
2
3
0
0
0
0
41
(,« i cuur
2.0
0
10
5
13
6
- 10
3
3
0
0
0
0
50
^ T ^*H« 1
2.5
0
8
12
23
6
5
13
2
1
0
0
c
70
l 1 u ur i
3.0
0
7
7
11
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
30
3.5
0
7
2
7
4
6
0
1
0
0
0
0
27
4.0
0
4
*
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
>4.0
0
5B
11
34
4
4
5
0
0
0
0
0
116
-------
*()<* OATE 68/12/20
TABLE A-7B
PBFI
SOUTHEAST
JHTMT TREATMENT FACHITtFS
1°IS2 MUNICIPAL WAST? INVENTORY
SERVING COHM./FAC.
NO TRE4TMFNT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVEO
CO
00
SERVED CnMM./F/VC.
BELOW 500 1*
500 - 999 ?.*
moo - 4099 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
10000 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50100 - 99999 7*
110000 - 24999° 8*
250000 - 499999 9*
500000 AND AROVE 1*
POPULATION SERVEO
12345
*****
1 f 5 ? 3
o " i - r
1 ° 3 1 1
) " I 2 2
1 1 ?79?fl 135P1 339?^
•) I B 0 2
-) 0 2 " "
7 ? 1 ^ 1
•> 1 3 1 r
? ^ 1 . " 1
1 »• * 1 r
1 " 1 0 r
1 " n o r
-i »" ft o r
•> " o T r
1 n r <• n
1 353" "55005 0 85r"f
6 7 S
* * *
535
r> ] •>
2 " 3
32?
1693C" 173T-" }?R(SOfti!
ft 7 2?
n •< i
1 1 "
35"
r •> tt
2 1 «.
n •> 2
n o ^
c ?
0 " 1
5
33546 25IS35 47?3«5
9 "
* *
•> •» ">">• P
? 3«S?P
^ -. •= MJBflM
? f 12 54193^
, . , - ,7-M13.
" n 46 r
r> n ? j7or
4 3?6*
" ^ 21 4R23f
" » f, '403"
r n e K143"
* 3 740M
r i ^ r
o .^ r r
i 3^5-r-
1 ** n r
5906r
-------
0
I
S
CD
RUN DATE 68/12/16
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-2B
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TENNESSEE RIVER
SECONDARY
PRELIMINARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25COO
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250COC-50M03
>5030CO
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
1
4
4
15
13
4
3
4
0
2
0
.3
50
* OF PPPULA-
COMMUMITIES TIP.N
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
1
4
4
14
12
4
3
4
0
1
0
0
47
1,600
1,590
2,900
11.385
36,320
24,950
36,050
129,000
0
131, OPP
0
0
381,795
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
1
1
15
9
14
*
0
1
•>-
0
0
52
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TtON COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
1
1
15 ^
9
12
q
0
1
I
*
0
49
0
285
550
19,077
28,995
70,975
97,100
0
45,000
11C, IPO
0
0
372,082
4
12
10
21
R
4
1
1
1
0
0
0
61
22,050
2,855
11,631
32,446
20,720
22,300
12,000
1.5CO
61, 0-50
0
n
0
186,5*2
-------
TABLE A-4B
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TENNESSEE RIVFR
SECONDARY
N 0
TpfATMFIT
UNKNOWN
<-500
'-0 500-1000
0
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
103000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
7
5
5
11
10
4
3
5
0
3
0
0
53
« OF POPULA-
C01MUNITIES TION
SEHVEO
6
5
5
9
9
2
3
3
0
0
0
0
4?
7t090
2,775
4,675
15,465
29,345
23,560
46,000
159,600
0
175,430
0
0
461,940
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
IB
8
14
29
23
17
10
1
1
1
0
0
122
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMM1JNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES S?RVF1
15
H
14
28
19
15
a
1
0
0
0
0
10°
166,320
3.7PO
10,505
•52, 4*. 5
P3,?75
173, -*00
145,464
12,000
120, npfl
167,000
0
0
8B4.209
1
0
f,
7
•>
0
1
0
0
0
n
0
27
*>,onn
3, '10
3,241
' 1,4
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TENNESSEE RIVER
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATI3
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NG. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
16
IB
39
26
25
12
6
0
2
0
0
144
0
16
20
45
29
27
14
7
1
3
0
0
162
0.5
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1.0
0
2
3
2
4
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
15
\t
1.2
0
1
2
5
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
13
lu. ui- r
1.4
0
0
2
4
1
1
2
4
0
0
0
0
14
'LAIN 11 |
1.6
0
4
0
9
3
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
23
[IN il it
1.8
0
2
3
4
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
LA ItbU*
2.0
0
0
1
2
4
6
2
1
0
1
0
0
17
4.0
0
3
i
3
2
3
1
3
3
3
3
0
14
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
IQ68 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TENNESSEE PIVER
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
CO
500000
TOTALS
0
18
20
44
27
25
12
6
0
2
0
0
154
0
19
23
50
30
27
14
7
1
3
0
0
174
0.5
0
4
5
6
3
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
22
1.0
0
4
e
22
13
10
4
1
0
1
0
c
63
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
0
3
2
4
4
3
1
4
0
0
0
0
21
0
0
2
4
2
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
11
0
3
0
1
1
4
1
0
0
1
0
0
11
0
1
0
5
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
11
CATEGORY <«RATIO OF)
2.0 2.5 3.0
0
0
3
0
1
1
1
0
I
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
3
1
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
1
0
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
7
3.5
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
2
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
-------
HUN DATE 68/l?/2C
TABLE A-7B
TMTMBOV
TEMNESSFE
JOINT TRF4TMENT MC
1 2
* *
SERVING COMM./FAC. 1
NO TREATMENT 0 r
PRIMARY 1 P
SECONDARY 1 *
POPULATION SERVED 1
CO
CO
CO
SERVED COM*. /FAC. 0 n
BFLOW 500 1* i 0
500 - 099 2* -> P
1000 - 4999 3* •> "•
5000 - 9999 4* 1 "
10000 - 24^99 5* •> i
2500C - 40009 6* ? '
50000 - 09099 7* 0
100000 - 249990 8* 1 «
2500T - 409990 9* -5 r
l°62 MUNICIPAL WASTc INVENTORY TPT/*I «;
COM. /par. PIPHL«TIOM
?4567oor>
********
" 1 l »• •» t "T*3r
n T | ^ •> o i ^ ^^r<-^«
n ^ p rj ^ j n « ]oj»rrrt
0^1Anrr«ir
n^p^^^rtn^**
rrirno'P""*
n7J^^«n«| qr«r»
r^nf*, A^^A*** *
r>'5r'lii>r''i«rr
of^rfv^^^f^fi"
f> 1 n r 1. n n " r r
50COOO AND A60VE 0*
POPULATION SERVEO
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATE 68/12/16
CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
OHIO RIVER
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N n
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
50 00-10000
10000-25000
25COO-50COC
50000-100000
100030-250000
250000-500000
>5000CO
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
5
12
27
97
48
30
38
18
3
2
1
*
284
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
4
12
26
94
45
29
35
16
3
1
1
1
267
193,695
5,033
19,040
152,670
140,095
223,520
638.98C
650,730
207,645
141,500
399,375
675,340
3,457,523
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
17
14
36
123
94
113
73
17
13
2
IB
0
520
« OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI-
IDENTIFIAftLE SERVED TIES
9
14
32
115
90
1^1
59
15
5
3
n
445
1,638.345
5.035
30.880
239,190
325,885
732, ?50
834,915
542,095
385. 27C
311.875
1,330,405
0
6,376,145
1
40
125
199
65
31
14
2
•a
1
0
n
481
POPULATION
SERVED
i.nro
14,878
"1,875
?8B,755
215,765
214,901
2?0,940
45.0PC
258,885
166,690
0
0
1 ,490,489
-------
TABLE A-4B
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1969 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
OHIO RIVER
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TREATMENT
to
to
en
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
17
10
26
95
47
34
39
13
6
3
1
3
294
f OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
15
9
25
94
47
32
35
12
6
2
1
1
279
211,640
3,445
20,775
170,565
164,465
243,730
652,065
493,^45
462,700
327,000
399,375
0
3,144,205
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
151
43
97
237
151
124
77
?0
14
2
18
0
934
* OF PPPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIES SERVED
94
?.*
89
225
125 "
113
62
17
5
I
3
0
762
1,785,730
14,592
458,64?
404,190
8*1,813
977, ?60
714,775
331, R5P
3B4,000
1,406,000
0
7,576,657
B *3,935
4*> 17, M5
107 P?,739
•>•» n«,«7o
TO *4,RM
6 «7,A?S
? *«.pno
0 t,300
0 0
n o
0 0
3?6 646, 5?^
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
PRELIMINARY
cn
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
UHIO R[VER
TOTAL
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
69
130
308
188
144
100
31
16
4
3
3
996
0
107
160
350
200
154
107
33
17
5
4
3
1140
0.5
0
1
5
12
7
17
3
0
0
0
0
0
45
1.0
0
46
53
76
38
23
10
2
2
0
0
1
251
1.2
0
11
20
51
34
18
12
5
1
0
0
0
152
NO. Of
1.4
0
4
14
49
29
24
15
5
4
0
0
0
144
PLANTS
1.6
0
2
13
55
22
17
16
1
1
I
0
0
128
IN SIZE
1.8
0
3
17
27
20
14
14
6
0
0
0
0
101
CATEGORY <«RAT10 OF)
2.0 2.5 3.0
0
3
4
23
10
12
10
4
1
0
0
0
67
0
9
14
32
21
11
13
3
1
2
3
1
110
3
2
7
8
6
9
5
6
4
I
1
0
49
3.5
0
7
1
7
3
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
25
4.0
0
0
4
1
2
3
2
0
3
1
0
0
16
>4.3
3
19
a
9
8
3
4
3
0
3
3
1
52
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
OHIO RIVER
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
CO
(JO
-J
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
75
135
323
193
149
103
32
16
4
4
3
1037
0
114
166
367
207
160
111
34
16
5
5
3
1190
<-
0.5
0
11
28
52
28
22
8
0
0
0
0
0
149
1.0
0
53
69
145
79
67
30
13
5
1
0
1
463
1 r
1.2
0
14
22
43
27
23
19
5
2
1
0
0
156
«u» ur r
1.4
0
4
5
36
22
11
12
2
2
0
0
0
96
•LHIIIi 1
1.6
0
1
9
21
12
10
13
5
3
2
0
0
76
in i lie
1.8
0
3
10
18
13
6
9
4
1
0
2
1
67
I.AI cuur
2.0
0
1
4
10
5
8
8
2
1
0
1
0
40
* T S.*H A 1
2.5
0
5
4
14
5
7
5
2
2
0
1
0
45
I u ur i
3.0
0
1
3
12
R
3
0
0
1
P
1
0
29
3.5
0
4
2
5
I
1
4 .
1
0
0
0
0
18
4.0
0
0
3
j
2
2
1
0
1
1
0
0
12
>4.0
0
17
7
7
K
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
•?«
-------
RUN
ft 68/12/20
TABLE A-7B
OHin
JiINT TREATMENT
MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
C,nM./FAr. POPULATION
SFRVFn
l?34567«°ft
**********
SERVING CQMM./FAC. i •, « 19 17 f, 3 « " . •» 66 «
NO TREATMENT t315?0'»11'%l? 236285
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION
OJ
CD
SERVED COMM
l"35B523n*2T '36?89«i
1"'!971141'>27 2flr2°45
SERVED 355 214P 1R"<75 1A2325 34"fcO5 ?61*1'5 22??25 J^Q^JP" * •> 44-3]?^
./FAC. 1 1 lp 23 24 11 IB 12* 0 1 215 «"
BELOH 500 I*1iriri2n'«'»16 45Rr
500 -
1^00 -
5^00 -
icioo -
25100 -
5C r\ o n » 1P1''25'<
4999 3* >5 1 ft 15 12 ? 12 4" r> ^ np 237255
9999 4* -1 n 2 45 s 2 33 " 1^1 3329?r
24999 5*Oro23!»")?An«'5| 42P3?"
49999 6*Tiriin?6-r0 246345
99999 7*^->nnr 1 1 '. n * 9 114A35
249999 B*0f'"'?r'»"*'>r'%''r
499999 9*5'>norri-<"''-"'<
ABOVE 0*iC""rnn-'0"inr
SERVED I 4275 2pT35 74975 Bfil25 °«1 5" l2?«-'''> Q715"1? i -. •. 13775JS
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATE 68/12/16
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
LAKE F.<»IE
SECONDARY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
< = 5CO
to 500-1COO
CO
10 1000-2500
2500-5000
50 00-1 00 X
10C30-250CO
25COO-5000C
50C30-100000
100000-250&CO
25000 0-5COOOO
>5MOGO
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
4
0
2
10
4
a
6
1
3
0
0
1
39
III OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SFRVED
3
0
2
0
4
6
6
1
3
o
0
c
34
64,685
0
1,150
13,345
16,080
37.540
126,245
31,980
247,470
0
0
222, rco
760,495
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
4
0
4
26
18
16
9
2
1
2
2
2
86
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
4
n
4
?6.
18
14
9
2
1
?
2
1
83
16,095
0
7,875
46,285
63,770
137,320
131,480
74,125
51,035
296,770
699.205
1.0*1. M5
2,600,785
0
4
15
10
4
5
1
r
0
0
0
n
48
n
U?«0
27.375
15.760
?*,240
12,905
n
p
n
o
0
107,670
-------
TABLE A-4B
I960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
MUNICIPAL WAST? INVFNTH7Y
LAK* ERIE
SECONDARY
N 0
fMTNARY
TRFATMCNT
UNKNOWN
<*500
§ 500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
2
2
3
7
5
\
2
0
0
0
31
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIF.S TION
SERVED
6
0
2
2
3
5
5
1
2
0
0
0
26
422, B85
0
1,245
2,580
11.6PO
39,525
97,725
34,425
217,830
0
0
0
827,805
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
76
1
7
45
23
23
12
2
2
2
2
1
106
« OF
COMMUNITIES
36
1
7
45
22
18
11
2
2
1
2
1
148 3,
POPULA-
TION
SERVED
721, P20
0
5,005
74,24?
80,740
14R.100
107,540
BO, 67?
1?(S,140
3*0,000
737,400
630, POO
,lnl,f.A5
NO. OF
COMMUNI-
TIES
0
5
14
'-I
3
7
1
0
r\
O
o
0
?6
POPULATION
SFPVEO
0
2,250
U.3SO
15.T?*
1 I t 7£Q
I ^> t ' "0
14,0,0
n
0
r:
0
n
7?,?OS
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
TOTAL
1966 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENT3RY
LAKE ERIE
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
12
15
50
28
27
18
6
4
2
3
1
166
0
21
25
62
31
32
18
7
4
3
3
2
208
0.5
0
0
1
1
1
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
8
1.0
0
9
13
14
4
4
3
1
0
0
0
1
49
i r
1.2
0
6
5
9
9
10
2
1
0
0
0
0
42
4.3
0
3
1
2
1
1
D
1
D
a
3
3
9
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
f\3
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
LAKE ERIE
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
12
15
52
28
30
20
7
4
2
3
1
174
0
21
26
64
31
35
20
e
4
3
3
2
217
0.5
0
2
7
5
1
6
2
1
a
i
0
0
25
1.0
0
7
10
21
10
5
6
3
1
1
0
1
65
\ NI,
1.2
0
5
6
10
9
8
1
1
0
0
1
0
41
It Ur K
1.4
0
4
0
10
3
4
3
0
0
0
0
0
24
LAIYI3 1
1.6
0
I
0
8
I
6
4
2
1
1
0
0
24
n site
1.8
0
0
0
4
2
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
12
UH 1 cuun
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
1
0
2
1
7
I %»f* « 1
2.5
0
1
1
2
3
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
9
• u u r F
3.0
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0 >4.0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
-------
RUN H4TE 68/12/20
TABLE A-7B
PRELIMINARY
LAKE ERIF
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITIES
1963 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTALS
SEPV^O
1
*
SERVING COMM./FAC. 1
NO TREATMENT 1
PRIMARY 7
SECONDARY 3
POPULATION SERVED 1
CJ SERVED CPMM./FAC. *
BELOW SOP 1* I
500 - 999 2* 1
1000 - 4999 3* T
5000 - 9999 4* 0
10000 - 24999 5* 0
25000 - 49999 6* D
50000 - 99999 7* "5
110000 - 249999 8* 3
250000 - 499999 9* 0
500000 AND ABOVE o* i
POPULATION SERVED 0
?. 3
* *
0 1
n o
P. n
0 1
* 2665
" 1
0 "
0 P
r n
0 1
P n
0 r
0 f!
0 0
0 0
o r
r I?PP
4
*
^
0
n
•>
n
T
0
0
•>
0
T
n
0
n
1
1
n
5
*
2
r
?
P
56265
,
n
p
1
p
*
r
p
P
r
r
3127P
6 7 «
* * *
1 2 6
n n r>
1 2 1
0 P. 5
44fl*5 181315 2138T3n
1 7 34
n 2 1
n 0 2
i •> 11
" 2 ?
1 2 I"
P 1 6
"'02
P
o ^ r
n
1440" 74515 536335
9 "
* *
9 !» 12
^ >) f> «
6 5-4475
0 » 6 I9!fl6<>5
?42317«
0 * 46 "
". n 3 PR"
? 148-
fl * 1? 36r4"
1 P « 2403'"
" P 15 2^5475
" 7 244345
•> i ? i44£(,r
0 r> r r
1
f^ T « r
*«•»•> A5781P
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATE 68/12/16
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
UPPFR MISSISSIPPI RIVER
PRIMARY SFCONOARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
O500
500-1000
1COO-2500
2530-50CC
5000-1000C
IOC 00-25000
25030-5000C
50000-100001
100000-250000
251000-500000
>50r;')co
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
1
53
60
71
23
10
15
12
4
0
n
1
250
« OF POPULA- TOTAL
COMMUNITIES TION # OF
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED PLANTS
1
47
58
65
20
9
14
12
4
0
0
0
230
1,400
1,057,475
4C.055
96,065
70,655
59,230
225, 3CO
397,247
252,800
0
0
3.8C5
2,204,032
14
139
261
349
182
99
65
16
4
3
0
13
1,144
» OF PPPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
13
115
247
3?4
167
91
49
13
4
3
0
0
1.026
161,090
39,353
315,470
487,327
647,887
632,469
788,205
4R2.705
311,000
502,700
0
4,764,785
9,132,991
3
26
47
48
13
7
4
2
0
r,
P
1
151
147,615
12,755
35,260
85,7<>r
65,475
84,300
173,345
89, SOI
5l.?5«J
n
o
750, C"0
1,495,?°^
-------
TABLE A-4B
I960 CENSUS
P R I MARY
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MISSISSIPPI RIVEP
SECONDARY
N n
PPFlIMINARV
TPEATMFNT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
£. 1000-2500
5 2500-5000
5000-10000
10030-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
f OF
PLANTS
5
49
56
52
25
14
16
14
6
0
0
I
238
# OF POPULA- TOTAL
COMMUNITIES TIDN « OF
SERVED PLANTS
5
45
54
49
22
13
16
13
5
0
0
C
222
140,765
14,565
39,145
R0.705
81,631
98,135
252,750
426,950
523,610
0
0
3,805
1,662,061
48
266
391
41fl
200
106
77
23
7
4
0
3
1,540
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TIDN t.OMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIPS SFOVEO
42
244
37*
3°7
184
04
5*
15
5
3
0
0
1,414
512,390
1, 100, 'Ofc
260,67?
59<3,575
603,72,
607,759
878,380
562, P5P
436,^00
450, *00
0
4,771,000
11,062,283
3 3,000
?' 9,065
2? 20,075
?T 43,735
7 ?4,opn
3 4*,BM?
0 106,845
0 '6,001
0 51,?50
0 n
0 ^
n o
70 3?7,aio
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
PRELIMINARY
o
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COM*. NO. OF
SfWD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
334
412
449
178
114
66
34
11
7
0
3
1608
0
356
426
469
183
122
70
34
11
7
0
3
1681
0.5
0
9
4
9
7
1
2
0
0
1
0
1
34
1.0
0
46
84
84
29
26
9
4
0
1
0
0
283
(NO. OF
1.2 1.4
0
47
56
60
26
16
5
4
0
0
0
0
214
0
53
67
68
28
17
11
3
1
0
0
1
249
PLANTS
1.6
0
43
68
76
24
18
12
3
1
2
0
0
247
IN SIZE
1.8
0
24
38
38
16
10
a
5
0
1
0
1
141
CATEGO
2.0
0
25
28
31
13
9
5
4
3
0
0
0
lie
RY <«RATIO OF)
0
44
27
47
26
8
11
7
4
1
0
0
175
0
14
21
25
4
10
2
3
1
0
0
0
80
0
9
6
18
4
2
1
0
1
1
0
0
42
0
4
9
4
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
24
>4.3
0
36
IB
5
3
3
2
1
3
3
3
0
74
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
f
O
— J
UNKNOWN
C-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
COMM. *i
SRVD P
0
348
423
452
182
118
66
34
12
7
0
4
1646
10. OF
'LANTS
0
377
440
472
187
126
71
34
12
7
0
4
1730
<«
0.5
0
131
151
93
39
11
14
4
1
0
0
0
444
1.0
0
99
121
169
70
50
16
9
2
3
0
0
539
i
1.2
0
24
29
40
26
23
17
4
0
1
0
0
164
NU. Ul-
1.4
0
31
27
34
13
9
5
4
2
1
0
1
127
KLANIi 1
1.6
0
16
32
30
11
10
4
5
2
0
0
0
no
in s i tfc
1.8
0
12
16
16
7
6
4
0
1
0
0
0
62
LAI tl»Ut
2.0
0
13
17
20
6
6
.4
2
2
1
0
0
71
IT **K«]
2.5
0
21
19
30
13
5
2
5
1
1
0
2
99
i in on
3.0
0
8
e
15
0
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
38
3.5
0
3
3
11
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
21
4.0
P
1
5
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
12
>4.0
0
IB
1?
Q
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
43
-------
RUM DATE 63/12/20
TABLE A-7B
UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVF"
JOINT TRFATMFMT FACILITIES
1^42 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SERVING COMM./CAC.
NT TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SFRVEO
O
00
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOM 500 1*
500 - 999 2*
110- - 4099 3*
5000 - 9999 4*
IC100 - 24999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
50000 - 99999 7*
11000P - 249099 8*
250000 - 490900 o*
500000 ANO ABOVE 1*
POPULATION SERVED
1 ? 1
* * *
4 7 16
1 « 1
> ? 3
4212
152) 7?5* 41712
1 ? M
I ? 1
1 I •»
7 1 7
•) 1 o
1 r n
•) 0 0
0 r n
-100
^ 0 ^
•) ? o
2"5 497T 145RO
4
*
7
O
"
7
5?415
4
0
•5
1
->
0
0
0
1
f>
1
1670
c 6
* *
K 7
r n
1 ?
9 4
16»66<" 247242 36"
e 14
1 1
1 *
5 o
1 ?
1 ?
r >\
«
P "
r P
r n
17199 751?? i?«
7 «
* *
5 11
n ?
1 l
4 R
5"* 741265"^
9 15'
1 7
fl 6
3 ?6
r ™
1 41
3 12
" •!
•^ 1
T ?
3 1
75? 627545^
THT/>LS
CO*. /FAT. "IPIILATIOM
0 «
* *
*?
n 7 •» RO41 IP
P « e 1272742
«• 61?4597
S1-»r040
p n ?"•? r
" !i 36?"
" •> 14 0440
" -1 6? 1445°7
* " 4? 266475
n T 47 71657P
15 460?0"
n ^ R 5H6! R5
P 1 !?6?85
0 ° 2 71665"
n 1 , 155-4P5
r> •» " 651o»4fi
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATE 69/12/16
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
WESTERN GREAT LAKES
SFCOMDAR Y
N 0
TREATMENT
.e-
o
CO
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-100^0
10000-250CO
25COO-50COC
50000-100CCO
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
10
14
15
46
31
23
22
6
5
5
0
1
178
# OF POPUIA-
COMMUNITIES TtON
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
5
14
15
44
29
2?
22
6
5
2
0
1
165
26?, 255
3, 550
11,195
75,530
105,598
156,765
316,315
260,340
388,200
349,600
0
3,667,000
5,597,258
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
A
14
38
64
40
26
24
11
7
B
0
0
240
# OF POPULA- NO. PF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPtM ATTON
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIGS SERVFO
5
14
3fi
62
39
25
15
9
5
5
0
0
217
1.192.360
4.469
26.785
100,035
13P.475
164,555
275,240
342.380
366,770
783.460
0
0
3,386,540
1
4
4
10
8
5
0
n
c
0
c
0
41
2.001
l.?65
3, "2"
20.765
33,10')
36,095
0
0
5PO
0
0
n
°6,745
-------
TABLE A-4B
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
WESTERN GREAT LAKES
SECONDARY
N fl
TRF4TMFNT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500009
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
15
13
18
44
29
23
19
5
2
2
0
1
171
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITtES TION
SERVED
5
13
IB
41
29
23
18
5
2
1
0
1
156
384.100
3,992
13,265
69,110
102.848
140,995
275,920
213,340
160,600
345,000
0
3,667,000
5,376,170
TOTAL
PLANTS
30
21
45
85
46
31
22
16
8
5
0
0
311
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TIHN • COMMENT- PnPUL*T10N
SERVED TIES SFRVCO
16
23
44
84
45
30
19
11
7
4
0
15
2«3
1 ,255,720
7,«8R
31,746
128,200
153, 8?5
200,55*
379, '15
501,920
678,470
B6«.*00
0
0
4,203,13"
•> ?,500
fl 3,140
21 '5,975
IP 24,045
« •'4,105
4 30,175
? ?5,770
0 0
o n
o o
0 0
0 0
*4 1*5, ?10
-------
TABLE A*5B
RUN DATE 69/02/12
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WESTERN GREAT LAKES
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
41
75
104
72
49
36
12
14
7
0
1
411
0
43
79
112
75
52
38
12
14
a
0
i
434
0.5
0
3
3
1
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
12
1.0
0
3
11
22
9
6
6
1
0
0
0
0
58
ir
1.2
0
3
19
14
12
4
5
1
1
0
0
0
59
iu. ur i
1.4
0
8
6
15
9
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
44
•LAN 13 1
1.6
0
4
8
12
9
4
4
2
1
1
0
1
46
IN 31 ct
1.8
0
5
7
11
3
12
2
0
2
1
0
0
43
lA 1 t-bUI
2.0
0
2
7
15
5
4
5 -
1
0
1
0
0
40
4.0
0
7
2
5
2
i
2
1
1
1
3
3
23
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WESTERN GREAT LAKES
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
> 5 000 00
TOTALS
0
44
82
116
TT
52
40
14
15
9
0
2
451
0
46
87
124
80
56
42
14
15
10
1
2
477
<-
0.5
0
9
14
11
10
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
49
1.0
0
10
22
43
27
17
12
3
2
0
0
0
136
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
0
7
16
28
10
8
4
0
0
1
0
0
74
0
2
5
4
6
fl
10
1
1
2
1
0
40
0
4
10
10
5
6
4
3
0
1
0
0
43
0
1
4
11
7
4
5
2
3
1
0
0
38
CATEGOf
2.0
0
0
5
1
7
5
2
0
2
1
0
2
25
(Y <«RAT
2.5
0
3
5
8
3
3
1
0
4
3
0
0
30
in DPI
3.0
0
1
0
3
1
1
0
?
1
1
0
0
10
3. -5
0
0
3
1
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
10
4.0
0
2
0
0
?
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
if
>4.C
0
7
3
4
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
18
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/20
TABLE A-7B
WFSTERN GRF.AT LAKSS
JOINT TREATMENT FACIIITTFS
1962 HUNICTPAL WA«TF INVENTORY
TOTALs
1
*
SERVING COMM. /FAC. 0
NO TREATMENT 3
PRIMARY 1
SECONDARY ?
POPULATION SERVED •>
SERVED COMM. /FAC. T
BELOW SCO 1* ?
5<>0 _ 990 2* 0
1/100 - 409? 3* 1
5000 - 9090 4* I
10100 - 24999 5* 1
?50?0 - 49009 6* •>
50130 - 99999 7* T
100000 - 249999 fl* 1
zsroor - 499099 9* i
50f030 AND ABOVF 0* 1
POPULATION SERVED T
2 3 4 5 6 7 P
*******
i 4 "i P 1 1 7
0 1 n r r, n
* 2 2 f 1 3 4
" 2 3 ? n ? i
°3?$ 2B7T. 16147" *6«P" 43?7P^ SS167rr
" 2 ? fl 1 O or
" ' 1 "> 1 " I "
r r 0 n i n x
"1 ? 7 1 4 17
0 *> 1 2 " 113
1 C 1 ? n 7 99
r r -> o O'l •)«
n r» « « n i n
*• r " r o •) i
p fi •) o r 3 •>
" r- 1 r ? !» 1
« 143" 5^"? 54607 757P I^^SS '•ife??*?
a i
* *
r n ^ « *
•> ^ fl n
" n IP 46477P5
" " 12 154727^
•« " ^104071;
n 0 11? r
r r. •» 7f,f.
f^ ^ * ^
27 ^o«ft
r> » If llHTt
0 " 34 45T712
n •» tp 55173^
!? fton?;
r 1 112-r,
n r " ^*
5 1 7*-T"
^ ^ • 2721 5i"5
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATE 68/12/16
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
UNKNOWN
<«300
500-1000
•r- icoo-253c
H*
•*" 2500-5050
5COO-10TCC
10000-25000
25CCQ-500CO
50COO-10C003
IOOCOO-2500CO
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MISSOURI RtVFR
PRIMARY SECONDARY
N 0
TRF&TMENT
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
3
51.
64
45
14
10
9
2
3
1
1
0
203
* OF POPULA-
CflMMUNITIES TIOM
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
2
50
64
42
14
10
9
2
2
0
o
0
195
2, COO
14,5?0
33,775
59,520
51,170
67, 550
133,300
71,800
157,000
8,000
557,000
0
1,154,635
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
23
273
215
251
R9
5*
41
13
4
2
5
3
-------
TABLE A-4B
PPFt
I960 CENSUS
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTF 1NVFNTHRY
MISSOURI RIVFP
P R I MARY
N n
UNKNOWN
< = 500
500-1000
j, 1000-2500
Cn 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
6
45
45
33
14
11
13
2
5
1
2
0
177
* OF POPULA- TOTAL
COMMUNITIES TIDN # OF
SPRVFO PLANT?
3
45
45
?3
14
11
12
2
5
0
2
0
172
208,500
13.165
31,045
42,900
50,845
87,000
235,600
8?, 000
332,900
8,000
624,000
0
1,724, 955
100
4R5
288
?93
«
59
71
17
3
4
1
1
1,370
» OF PRPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TIPM CHMMIINT- POPilliTTHN
SFRVFO TIPS SCOVF'>
R7
477
2RO
?72
05
47
21
11
3
2
0
1
1 ,2R6
1,071 ,225
203,330
106,455
426,722
3<1,°7C
343, !4C
3*7,210
513,300
!15, COO
206,300
fO.COO
100,000
3, "04, 652
1 4,-"!«
no ?I"),7TS
17 JT.070
21 24,670
4 16,100
«: 36,400
1 17.000
3 •>„.««
0 0
1 218,000
o
0
1 i^t. 41 ^, 140
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
PRELIMINARY
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MISSOURI RIVER
TOTAL
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMH. NO. OF
SRVI) PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-250.0
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
447
2T5
259
89
50
39
11
12
4
1
0
1187
0
465
285
270
100
54
40
12
13
4
1
0
1244
<«
0.5
0
1
9
7
6
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
25
1.0
0
105
71
59
20
11
4
2
3
0
0
0
275
( i
1.2
0
70
54
41
18
7
6
4
0
0
0
0
200
MO. OP 1
r.4
0
65
49
37
23
7
4
0
1
0
0
0
186
PLftNJb I
1.6
0
59
2fl
28
14
4
5
3
2
0
0
0
143
IN bl it
1.8
0
28
23
25
6
4
1
1
1
1
0
0
90
LAI tl>UN
2.0
0
35
14
21
b
3
3
0
4
0
1
0
87
,T <,«K»I
2.5
0
33
15
25
4
5
6
0
1
1
0
0
90
1 U '.I r I
3.0
0
20
9
?
2
7
3
0
0
1
0
0
51
3.5
0
13
0
3
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
20
4.0
0
6
3
3
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
14
>4. 0
0
30
19
12
1
4
5
0
3
1
0
0
(•3
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
MISSOURI RIVFR
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PREIIM1NABY
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
COMM. C
SRVO F
0
502
303
276
98
60
46
12
13
4
1
0
1315
tO. OF
'LANTS
0
520
313
288
109
65
48
13
14
4
1
0
1375
0.5
0
122
79
58
19
13
4
1
4
0
3
0
297
1.0
0
277
159
154
61
26
23
10
4
0
0
0
714
\r
1.2
0
41
22
20
7
4
5
1
1
1
0
0
102
1.4
0
10
11
14
9
7
5
0
1
0
0
0
57
'twniia I
1.6
0
18
12
8
5
3
2
0
1
1
1
0
51
IN Slit
1.8
0
6
Q
6
3
6
1
0
1
C
0
0
32
(.Al tbUH
2.0
0
13
2
8
2
3
2
0
1
i.
1
0
0
32
:T V«KAI
2.5
C
11
8
5
1
2
2
1
C
1
0
C
31
lu ur p
3.0
0
2
1
5
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
11
3.5
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4.0
C
1
0
3
0
?
1
0
0
C
C
0
7
>4.0
0
18
10
5
1
1
3
P
0
0
0
0
3R
-------
RUM OATf 6B/12/20
PRFtTMJMAP.Y
SERVING COHM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SF&VFO
1
*
0
•3
0
0
J
TABLE A-7B
MISSOURI
JOINT TREATMENT FAC1L1 TI »=$
MUNICIPAL WftS^E INVFNTO»Y
3
1376«S
TOTALS
. POPULATION
?•>
6
14
17451P5
CD
SERVED CO"M./F»C.
8FLOW 500 I*
5PO - 999 2*
HOC - 4999 3*
5000 " 4QQ9 A1^1
10100 - ?4999 5*
25000 - 49999 6*
5CTOO - 99999 7*
100000 - 249999 «*
25C100 - 49*9999 9*
50C100 ANO ABOVF n*
POPULATION SERVED
fl2'>
n
4
1
3
0
n
r
f
6*65
J
1
1
585
17
1
7
7
1
1
47
11
17
4
745"
217?*
•» 14?70<«
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATE 60/12/16
1960 CEMSUS
PRELIMINARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTHWEST-LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER
P R I MARY
SECONDARY
N (1
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5003-10000
10000-25000
25000-50COO
50000-100CCO
100000-250000
250000-5C3000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
1
23
47
79
24
15
7
3
1
2
3
0
203
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
1
23
46
75
22
12
3
2
0
1
0
0
185
11,300
7,170
27,195
97,67(1
54,130
75,000
45,600
60,290
0
193,785
125,300
0
697,440
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
a
92
145
215
12ft
104
ST
18
14
4
13
0
821
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI-
IDF.NTIFIABLF SERVED TIES
5
83
145
20?
121
90
63
9
4
3
3
0
72fl
152, 96C
30.868
91,863
303,332
413,538
•v 593, 16C
979, B04
333,575
356,335
325,000
714,45?
0
4,294,885
2
7
15
30
78
12
12
6
3
1
1
1
118
POPULATION
SERVFO
2,800
1,695
8,035
39,R65
flO.225
76,020
169,145
197,470
121,400
160,000
4"7,525
840,000
2,194,18^
-------
TABLE A-4B
OOP)
I960 CENSUS
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
SOUTHWEST-LOWER, MISSISSIPPI PIVFR
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
jr 5000-10000
ro
O 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
9
16
27
31
11
7
3
1
3
0
1
1
110
* OF PflPULA-
CDMMUNITIES TION
SERVFD
7
16
27
28
10
3
1
1
0 -
0
0
97
292,655
4,850
16,105
40,085
32,355
37,300
38,000
74,400
0
121,000
140,000
836,085
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
106
20?
240
33».
165
114
R4
17
U
5
'
2
1,260
# OF
COMMUNITIES
67
106
233
7*3
13*
05
63 1
10
5
1
2
0
1,003 5
POPUl A- N0« OF
T!ON COMMIINT- POCtlHTTON
SFRVFD TIPS 4°,-»7t>
P3,«7fl 1" ?,34^
170,035 ?0 5,6^0
461, 7A4 IT ?»,*«.*
540, 451! 1 •> 47,iS50
,(J7?, "79 fl |^oti;f)s
41^,000 ? jnn,ier>
47 ) f ^on o r>
1OO,7QO 1 1^6,^00
74?, 700 0 4-57, 5?5
12,?00 ! «ii»it«i01
,414,051 fi 1 ,T'.5,734
-------
0
1
s
t
s
RUN DATE 69/02/12
TOTAL
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
^ 10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
COMM.
SRVD
0
161
175
218
114
81
51
15
5
4
1
0
825
NO. OF
PLANTS
0
177
185
240
130
90
54
19
7
7
1
0
910
0.5
0
3
5
8
4
2
3
0
1
I
0
0
27
1.0
0
17
30
69
28
16
13
9
2
0
0
0
184
TABLE A-SB
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTHWEST-LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGORY <»RATIO OF)
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.5 3.0
0
20
31
29
23
12
8
1
1
1
1
0
127
0
24
26
45
19
13
12
2
2
0
0
0
143
0
19
21
31
8
7
8
1
0
2
0
0
97
0
21
12
8
10
4
1
3
1
0
0
0
60
0
12
18
22
11
12
1
0
0
0
0
0
76
0
16
13
13
12
13
Z
0
' 0
2
0
0
76
3
14
6
5
4
5
0
0
0
1
0
0
35
3.5
0
8
2
2
2
3
2
2
0
0
0
0
21
4.0
0
5
7
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17
PRELIMINARY
>4.D
3
18
V
it
8
3
*
1
0
0
0
0
47
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
r-o
TOTAL
1966 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
SOUTHWEST-LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVFR
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
UNKNOWN!
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
CCMM. C
SRVO f
0
187
215
253
129
99
57
20
6
4
1
0
971
<0. OF
>LANTS
0
207
230
282
146
109
62
24
8
7
1
0
1076
0.5
0
53
84
69
30
20
10
I
0
1
0
0
268
1.0
0
84
85
134
61
36
28
16
5
. 2
1
0
454
ir
1.2
0
2R
27
24
19
15
6
3
1
1
0
0
124
JQ. OF P
1.4
0
10
6
13
9
12
a
i
i
0
0
0
60
•LANT5 I
1.6
0
3
4
13
5
7
6
0
0
1
C
0
39
N 5li6
1.8
0
3
4
8
7
6
0
2
1
1
0
0
32
UAI tbU*
2.0
0
2
6
7
1
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
21
IT ^«KAI
2.5
0
5
3
3
IS
4
2
0
0
1
0
0
24
lu uri
3.0
0
2
1
0
4
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
10
3.5
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
4.0
0
2
1
5
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
>4.0
0
15
a
5
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
32
-------
SERVING COMM../FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
PIPIILATION SERVED
TABLE A-7B
MISSISSIPPI RIV?P
J1INT TRFATMFNT PACII im$
i°«>? MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTM S
r
11?"!"
I*O
Cu
SERVED CHMM./FAr.. 3 1 P -J 7 1 1 ?
BELOW 500 l*ir>firrf» i
f ? 12 r
0 * 4 Ofti*
50« _ 999 2*
lf^1u ^ 4Q9o 3^
5^00 - ^^99 4*
IflOO - 2'»'»'?9 5*
25100 - 49P99 6*
5C101 - 99999 7*
ncoo" - 340999 p*
250700 - 499999 9*
50C100 AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVFO
oner 6670" 16625
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATE 68/12/16
CENSUS
PRFLHINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
COLORADO RIVER
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<*500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-500^
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
soooo-iooooo
100000-2500CO
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PUNTS
0
16
7
10
6
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
43
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SFRVFO
0
16
7
6
6
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
38
0
3,805
3,615
12,714
21,980
18,700
0
0
0
e
0
0
60,814
TOTftL
« 0<=
PLANTS
4
14
19
21
18
11
13
1
7.
\
?
0
106
# OP POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIFS TTON COMIUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVFO
4
n
19
19
14
10
11
1
1
1
1
n
94
12,500
4,343
16,233
29,610
55,285
83,965
153,340
25.000
170,000
164,700
288,000
0
1.002,976
0
•5
\n
9
3
2
1
P
o
0
p
0
30
0
1, 280
5,515
in,4PO
11,490
12,^30
?0,000
0
0
o
0
0
59,795
-------
TABLE A-4B
cn
1960 CENSUS
1500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
H OF
PLANTS
0
12
•»
3
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27
# OF
COMMUNITIES
0
12
8
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25
POPULA-
TION
SERVEO
0
3,400
4,B85
2,800
16,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
27,175
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
14
?S
?5
39
21.
14
11
1
2
1
1
0
157
* OF PPPULA-
COMMUNITIES TIHN
SERVED
1? 240,600
?7 0,12?
?5 1 O, 7OR
?A 57,575
17 71,400
l? iPi,r6«
10 '.53,4-5 5
t % 2SOOO
0 37ft,noO
1 16.4, 70P
0 J60.0CO
0 ?
142 1.3P7.721
MG. OF
COMMIINI- P
TIES
0
^
7
1
t
•)
1
P
0
n
P
n
If
n°US*oi?n
o
MS
4,000
1 ,77-5
.?,^
IT, CIO
?9t?cn
-
"
0
ri
0
41 , ftT^
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
COLORADO RIVER
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO,
• OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
jr- 2500-5000
ro
500000
TOTALS
0
15
8
15
18
11
7
3
1
1
1
0
80
0
18
9
16
19
11
7
3
2
2
1
0
88
UK
2.0
0
2
0
0
0
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
7
T *»KAI
2.5
0
0
2
5
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
9
iu ur i
3.0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3.5
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
4.0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
z
>4.0
0
6
0
1
1
1
3
0
3
3
0
0
5
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
COLORADO RIVER
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
O500
500-1000
f 1000-2500
ro
-J 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
29
13
27
24
12
9
3
1
2
1
0
121
0
32
15
29
25
12
10
3
2
3
1
0
132
0.5
0
15
5
4
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
29
1.0
0
11
7
16
18
8
5
1
0
3
0
0
69
IN
1.2
0
0
0
2
2
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
8
U. Uh K
0
0
2
2
0
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
8
LANIS 1
1.6
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
4
IN Mit
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LAI tOUK
2.0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
T ^»KAI
2.5
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
IU UP1
3.0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.0
0
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
6
-------
RUN OATE 68/12/20
TABLE A-7B
PRFLTMIN4RV
BJVFP
JOINT TRFATMFNT MCtl
2 MIJNICI°U WASTE INVENTORY
rnM./e«r.
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
f
ro
CD
SERVED COMM./FAC.
HELOW SCO 1»
500 - 999 2*
JOOO - 4999 3*
5000 _ 9999 4*
IC^flO - 24999 5*
75000 - 49999 6*
5P01C - 99999 7*
f)000^ - 249999 8*
25CTOO - 499999 o*
5WOO AND ABOVE 0*
POPULATION SERVEO
1234567"°"
******* ***
11?11121"P12"
lOOrtp^p^^orrv
•\rr>l>PnO'''<'l'<'*
1 1 2 3 1 1 2 t 0 "1? 41465«>
455 12''" 4f><10 347C1 llbf JK^T 17'T*1 l«i47'"> * * " 414^55
lll2r'l?r"P«
1 n r »> r i n "> 0 « 5H7«;
Tjri/)ron->pnj 7«r
•> n j j r> r •» n r n ''STrr
^pp^p'-ninni «;ffii-
-. - r •> r p i i o - ? ,,,pr
.^^fi^^^^^w^^- r
1"f .">rr»o^n^r^
^Or^r^*r'r'rtA^
^^r^rn^r^n""
^nP^PO^ ^^n^»rt
375 TO'* l^i^^ ?70^ r n l^^^O j 7 **> T^ ^ ^ ^ A^TT*^
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATE 68/12/16
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1V6Z MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WESTERN GULF
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<»500
5 00-1 OOP
1000-2501
2500-500C
5000-10030
10COO-25000
25000-50COC
50000-101CCO
100000-25'>000
250COO-5CCOOO
>5COOOO
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
7
25
40
7
5
1
5
1
0
0
3
86
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
7
25
38
7
4
1
0
1
0
0
0
83
0
2,340
13,126
42,696
25,200
18,800
10,000
n
48,300
0
0
0
160,462
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
46
17
67
155
130
71
72
33
13
8
5
75
692
« OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVE!)
7
17
63
151
110
66
55
20
Q
5
2
1
50 fl
66,130
6,325
42,385
200,427
338,065
431,731
709,035
574,300
599,4^0
768,600
554, 6CO
2,071,230
6,371 ,228
0
0
3
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
Q
0
0
1,685
4,2«0
6,870
9,000
17,500
n
0
0
0
0
39,255
-------
TABLE A-4B
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WESTERN GULF
SECONDARY
N 0
PRFt IM1N&RY
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
3
7
ir
23
7
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
63
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES T ION
SERVED
1
7
17
21
7
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
58
12,400
2,190
16,476
25,360
24,500
23,000
10,300
1,400
0
0
0
0
115,626
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
101
34
»2
179
131
75
66
26
11
12
10
51
77S
# OF PPPULA- NO. nF
COMMUNITIES TinN C9MMUNI- PPPUISTIPN
SERVED TIES SERV«=0
55
33
78
169
110
ft?
50
70
9
4
1
3
500
860,165
1>7,f.70
«!«,460
2fl3,750
4!
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WESTERN GULF
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
66
118
203
109
T9
63
16
14
9
4
2
683
0
86
131
246
130
97
72
19
18
9
4
2
814
<*
0.5
0
6
3
24
17
8
5
3
3
3
0
1
73
1.0
0
20
40
69
47
34
27
8
4
2
1
0
252
\T
1.2
0
3
15
27
16
17
9
4
1
1
0
0
93
mi. ut- t
1.4
0
6
11
28
18
9
5
2
6
1
0
1
87
'LANIS
1.6
0
4
13
15
4
9
8
1
1
1
0
0
56
IN SI it
1.8
0
4
7
18
5
5
6
0
1
0
0
0
46
LQ 1 till
2.0
0
6
6
9
7
4
7
1
0
0
0
0
40
JKT ^«KA
2.5
0
4
13
20
6
4
2
0
1
0
0
0
50
1 1U DM
3.0
0
9
S
6
3
4
2
0
0
1
1
0
35
3.5
0
5
1
9
3
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
?0
4.0
0
1
2
4
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
8
>4.0
0
18
11
17
4
3
0
a
0
0
i
0
54
-------
TABU A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
U)
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
WESTERN GULF
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5COO-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
70
119
203
109
80
63
17
14
10
4
2
691
0
91
133
246
131
98
72
20
18
10
4
2
825
0.5
0
31
22
37
23
16
7
3
3
2
0
1
145
1.0
0
46
87
173
93
64
47
12
11
4
2
1
542
1 1
1.2
0
0
7
10
7
8
7
2
1
2
1
0
45
Ml). DP »
1.4
0
0
4
6
2
3
6
2
3
2
1
0
29
'LANTb 1
1.6
0
0
5
3
0
3
I
0
0
0
0
0
12
in siit
UP
0
3
1
7
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
15
CATfcQUK
2.0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
T *»KAI
0
2
0
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
I U UM
3.0
0
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
p
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.0
0
4
5
6
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
20
-------
RUN OATP 68/12^20
CO
CO
SERVING CO*IM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
TABLE A-7B
HCHTCPM GUIF
JOINT TRFATMFNT FACtt
t«>62 HIIMICIPAt WAST* TMVFNTOBV
14
14
SERVED COMM./FAC.
BELOW 503
<5f)ri _ 3QQ
no/> _ 4000
5Qgr5 _ 9000
IP^Ift •• 24909
25">00 - 49909
5crt00 - 99999
ncioo - >49oo<»
2'iCTnO - 4«99«9
5100<™ AND ABOVE
POPULATION SPRVET
•> c "
1* •) f r
2* T n p
3* 1 0 n
4* 0 ? «
5* •) T r
6* o « n
7* 1 ^ • /"
8* 0 ^ r
9* T « c
0* n n r
? r? r
2 4 1 2 IB " 1 ? 7 <~
^r*f*T*3^^ O i^C
^ l r l r n •» 2 !??r
i ? i 1 ft r "• ill 7^'f
1 1 r ^ 1 r, * c;"'53li
?r??4C04 474ftr
^Api^f'T 112?'"'
•> r f « n " . • •- r
r . , , ^
TP (**""•»•'
^^Hippr^r^1
7^n^ ir959 2?7^ ??J-, 11?!^ - ^ - 21424-5
-------
TABLE A-28
RUN OATE 68/12/16
I960 CENSUS
PRl-LtMINAUY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
PACIFIC NORTHWEST
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1010-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50COO-101000
100000-250CCC
250000-5COOCO
>5000004
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
4
26
37
45
21
14
15
10
1
2
1
3
179
* OF POPULA-
COSMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
4
23
34
41
19
14
15
9
1
2
\ 1
1
164
30,200
5,995
2*,
-------
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-4B
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
PACIFIC NORTHHFST
SECONDARY
PRFl IMINflRY
N 0
UNKNOWN
<«500
jr 500-1000
CO
01 1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
11
25
24
32
17
13
12
6
1
1
1
0
143
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
7
21
24
31
16
12
12
5
1
1
1
0
131
192,590
431,684
17,3.25
52,390
56,470
110,420
181,100
191,000
75,000
184,500
340,000
0
1,832,479
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
24
53
82
76
48
21
19
4
0
1
0
0
328
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNT- POPULATION
SERVED TIPS SFRVFO
20
53
P2
75
46
20
1°
4
0
1
0
0
320
240,650
18,614
67, 170
113,005
-" 170, ?P5
163,145
330,170
211,000
0
"o,ceo
0
0
1,413, 030
1
A
a
1 2
3
?
1
0
n
o
o
0
T*
450
1,640
5,?40
' 4,61 5
8,010
9,500
M ,000
0
n
60, OOP
0
0
no, 445
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
PACIFIC NORTHWEST
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COM*. NO. OF <•
SRVO PLANTS
-c-
OJ
en
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
50
70
116
56
32
35
11
5
2
2
1
330
0
50
72
117
57
34
38
12
6
2
2
1
391
0.5
0
8
5
3
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
19
1.0
0
7
13
14
5
2
3
1
0
0
0
1
46
tNO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE CATEGOI
1.2
0
5
2
10
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
21
1.4
0
3
6
7
6
2
2
3
1
0
0
0
30
1.6
0
4
6
12
7
5
1
1
1
0
0
0
37
1.8
0
5
3
17
5
3
2
1
0
0
1
0
37
2.0
0
4
6
13
1
3
5
1
0
0
0
0
33
*Y <»RA1
2.?
0
3
13
11
11
4
8
3
3
2
0
0
58
no OF)
3.0
0
2
7
q
7
7
4
1
1
0
0
0
38
3.5
0
0
2
5
3
2
6
1
0
0
1
0
20
4.0
0
3
2
4
4
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
19
>4.0
3
6
7
12
5
1
2
3
0
3
0
a
33
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
CO
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
PACIFIC NORTHWEST
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
66
89
130
61
36
35
12
6
2
2
1
442
0
68
92
132
63
38
39
13
7
2
2
1
457
0.5
0
38
*3
38
8
3
3
2
0
0
0
1
136
1.0
0
18
20
33
14
6
9
4
1
0
0
0
105
\ r
1.2
0
3
4
14
14
4
7
2
0
0
0
0
48
tu. ur f
1.4
0
1
5
10
3
1
2
1
1
1
0
0
25
•unrci 3 i
1.6
0
0
0
4
5
5
3
1
2
1
1
C
22
n ai tr
1.8
0
1
2
4
5
4
4
0
0
0
1
0
21
U« i cmji<
2.0
0
1
6
5
4
2
4
1
1
0
0
0
24
iT X *f*M 1
2.5
0
2
5
8
3
1
3
2
2
0
0
0
26
1 u ur i
3.0
0
2
*
3
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
15
3.5
0
0
3
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
7
4.0
0
0
1
*
1
2
2
0
0
C
p
C
o
>4.0
0
2
1
6
2
5
1
0
0
C
0
0
1°
-------
HUN 04T? 68/12/20
PPF|
TABLE A-7B
">«CIf=IC
JOINT TREATMENT FACILITTFS
1962 MMNiriP«L WASTP IMVPNTflRV
TOTAIS
SERVING C01M./FAC.
NT TREATMENT
SEC-1ND4RY
PHPllLSTinN SFPVED
-C-
CO
SERVED CHMM./FAC.
BFLOW 501 1*
500 - 301 2*
5300 - 9909 4*
tOOOO - 24990 5*
?50QI*> - 49009 e>*
•iCIOO - 99999 7*
l^COOO - 249999 8*
500^31 AND ftBOVF 0*
t??45feTfl0/<
**********
1 n f t, 1, 1 r, ! o ".It "
T C 1 2 1 I " 1 * A 6 IToror
Oonl^P'jr, nift 74TTP
T " 7P*>r 38711 R4'1Pr 3S?ri f O^T<" »* i •» ? •) P ?i p Itr""'*'
-> ^ TT ? " T * r> ' ? ?4Plr
•)i"inipr<>''>p"''^
•^p^-jpni^ncp^
••)^p <^p«^*^«"*r
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/16
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-2B
MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
CALIFORNIA
SFCONH4RY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-10.JC
ICOO-2500
2500-500:
5000-10050
10030-25'?CC
25COO-5COJO
50030-101000
103000-250000
250000-5 i-QOCI
> 5000 CO
TOTALS
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
11
13
12
16
5
n
12
9
3
3
0
8
100
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TIHN
IDENTIFIABLE SERVFn
11
9
12
13
5
e
11
5
3
2
0
3
82
799,275
4,100
8,680
^2, 619
15,125
43,900
341,550
511, 74P
228,500
331,800
0
6,093,795
8,471,C84
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
36
1°
21
78
61
44
50
16
12
6
0
2
345
* OF POPULA- NO. DF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMIJNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
31
16
20
69
57
35
'6
10
Q
1
"
1
285
306, CIO
6,825
16, "85
199,372
v 206,829
311,935
644,51"
756,725
624,050
144,125
C
217,500
3,435,571
4
4
2
3
2
0
1
r
C
n
n
C
16
4,050
1,100
750
7,650
9.Q85
n
ifl.coo
"
0
450
n
0
41 ,985
-------
TABLE A-4B
i500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
13
13
9
11
4
9
14
6
5
2
0
7
-------
TABLE A-5B
RUN DATE 69/02/12
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
CALIFORNIA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
.£-
•T- 2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
24
23
60
63
46
60
36
22
8
2
5
349
0
43
30
67
64
54
72
38
24
9
3
6
410
0.5
0
0
2
3
3
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
13
1.0
0
3
3
10
8
9
9
5
3
1
0
1
52
\ i
1.2
0
0
2
4
4
6
4
4
5
0
0
2
31
1U. ur i
1.4
0
3
1
4
6
5
7
4
3
2
1
1
37
'LANI» 1
1.6
0
2
3
5
1
2
8
3
3
1
0
0
28
I'M Slit.
1.8
0
3
2
4
7
6
5
7
4
2
0
0
40
LA 1 tbU
2.0
0
2
i
2
4
4
6
5
2
0
0
0
26
KT S«K«I
2.5
0
4
1
11
8
6
Ml
6
2
1
0
2
52
III) Ut-l
3.0
0
1
4
2
4
2
8
2
1
0
0
0
24
3.5
0
2
1
Z
5
5
2
0
0
0
1
0
18
4.0
0
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
7
>4.3
0
21
9
17
I*
7
9
2
1
1
,,\.
0
«2
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
CALIFORNIA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<"500
500-1000
1000-2500
•*" 2500-5000
10 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS «
0
29
26
69
68
49
60
36
22
a
2
5
374
0
48
33
76
69
57
72
38
24
9
3
6
435
O
0.5
0
6
12
11
9
f>
3
1
3
0
0
0
51
1.0
0
16
12
34
28
31
33
21
11
6
0
3
195
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE
1,2 1.4 1.6 1.8
0
2
2
3
13
6
19
6
7
2
1
2
63
0
7
1
3
5
4
a
2
2
1
0
1
34
0
3
1
7
4
4
4
4
1
0
1
0
29
0
1
1
3
3
4
1
2
0
0
0
0
15
CATEGORY <«RATIO OF)
2.0 2.5 3.0
0
2
0
7
I
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
13
0
1
1
3
1
1
3
1
0
0
c
0
11
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3.5
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
1
ft
0
0
0
0
0
1
>4.0
0
10
2
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/20
TABLE A-7B
CO
CAL1FORNI4
JOINT TREATMENT
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TOTAl S
COM./FAC. PiPULATIfW
SERVING CDMM
./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SEpONDARY
POPULATION
SERVED COMM.
SERVED
/FAC.
8ELOW 500 1*
500 -
1000 -
5000 -
10000 -
25000 -
50000 -
10COOO -
25C700 -
500000 AND
POPULATION
009 2*
4999 3*
qqoq 4*
24999 5*
49999 6*
99999 7*
249999 8*
400999 q*
ABOVE 0*
SERVED
1
*
1
1
T
T
zro
o
D
•>
•>
0
1
1
"»
•5
?
0
a
2
*
2
0
P
2
I6ir»
?
0
i
n
0
1
0
r.
n
M
>>
lT60r
•»
*
13
0
6
7
53525
I''
3
4
S
2
r;
n
n
n
r>
^»
?r 8^r
4
+
7
0
2
5
49945
11
1
7
5
2
1
0
0
3
1
•>
42CB5
5
*
1^
r:
K
P
412510
27
3
4
15
0
it
\
0
r
r
n
12099f
6
*
12
0
3
9
486900
25
1
2
6
e
4
4
n
o
T
n
22ftl°i
7
*
o
?
5
4
558150
15
N.
T
2
4
4
3
1
1
1
A
0
14474"
8
*
9
*>
A
1
6833915
88
1
r>
14
o
?p
2?
14
6
2
n
343948"
o r>
* *
n n ftQ
1 1 1
n f ?7
i •> 36
n n . *
1 " Ift5
•\ 1 0
* 1 15
r o 52
p 0 25
-> " 33
^ n 28
0 i 15
*« 0 6
n * 2
n n «
•> •< "
r
20o
7^rm5
109641"
830ft745
r
?5flC
! 3905
163455
1514C5
47280"
8627^5
003705
65?4fi5
7H67r •
p
4'jn^or
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN OATE 68/12/16
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PR I M A R Y
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
GREAT BASIN
SECONDARY
N 0
T R F A THENT
UNKNOWN
O5QC
500-1000
1010-2500
2500-5COO
5000-1DOOC
10COO-25000
25000-500CC
50000- 103COO
100000-250000
250000-5COOCO
>500COO
TOTALS
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
0
4
3
11
5
0
1
0
9
0
0
0
24
# OF POPULA-
CO*IMl)NITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
4
3
9
5
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
22
0
1,650
1C, 405
I?, 715
17,400
0
2,200
0
0
0
0
0
44,570
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
11
9
15
13
14
14
10
1
1
0
0
0
88
* OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
7
9
I?
11
14
13
8
1
1
0
0
0
76
281,500
2,430
11,255
30,<»40
46,712
101, 2C 5
125,000
40,000
55,cro
P
0
n
694,042
0
2
6
6
1
1
1
0
(\
1
r
0
18
0
750
1,635
7,115
4,500
B.OCO
29,230
r»
r>
189,455
n
0
242,685
-------
TABLE A-4B
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
GRFAT BASIN
SECONDARY
N 0
PRELIMINARY
TPFATMFNT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
3
'
2
8
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
21
# OF
COMMUNITIES
2 1,
3
2 1,
B 9,
3 11,
1 6,
1 15,
0
0
0
0
0
20 47,
POPULA-
TION
SERVED
375
BOO
875
360
900
345
500
0
0
0
0
0
'.55
TOTAL
« OF
PLANTS
15
12
19
12
15
14
9
2
1
1
0
0
OQ
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
12 3°0,7«0
1? 7,?7P
17 3?, 765
11 24,»1«>
15 150,070
13 „ 147, RO^
B 1 40 « Q 40
7 S ^ ( ^0^
1 55,000
1 108,000
0 0
0 0
?2 1,113,4*5
NO. OP
rOMMUNI- POPUIATIPN
TIES SERVFO
^ 0
4 7<"7
5 2,7?5
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
GREAT BASIN
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF <«
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
5
10
14
18
12
20
2
6
1
0
1
89
0
5
10
15
19
12
20
2
6
1
0
1
91
0.5
0
2
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
1.0
0
1
2
3
4
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
14
(NO. OF PLANTS IN SIZE
1.2
0
0
0
1
3
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
8
1.4
0
0
0
1
1
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
7
1.6
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
4
1.8
0
0
1
1
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
6
CATEGORY <-RATIO OF»
2.0
0
1
0
1
0
1
3
0
1
0
0
0
7
2.5
0
0
0
3
2
1
2
0
2
1
0
0
11
3.0
0
I
2
1
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
9
3.5
0
0
0
2
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
6
4.0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
>4.3
0
0
2
1
i
3
3
3
1
3
3
3
13
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
GREAT BASIN
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
O500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
11
16
17
19
12
20
2
6
1
0
1
105
0
12
16
18
20
12
20
2
6
1
0
1
108
0.5
0
7
4
3
5
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
21
1.0
0
4
5
7
4
2
7
1
0
0
0
1
31
\ n
1.2
0
0
2
0
2
6
4
1
1
0
0
0
16
u« ur f
1.4
0
0
2
2
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
8
L «ii i :> i
1.6
0
0
1
0
I
1
1
0
0
0
0
c
4
IN 31 te
1.8
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
1
1
0
0
6
U« 1 CUilK
2.0
0
0
0
1
4
1
1
8
1
0
0
0
8
T Vs5*** 1
2.5
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
i u ur t
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
4.0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
>4.0
p
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
-------
RUN DATE 68/12/20
TABLE A-7B
P"!. THIN* «»v
C.RFAT PASIN
JHINT TRF.A.TMFNT FACtt ITTF.S
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
TOTAIS
SERVER
I
*
SERVING mMM./FAC. 1
NO TREATMENT 0
PRIMARY 1
SECONDARY -I
POPULATION SERVED 9P1
j
.f
00
SERVED CDMM./FAC. 1
«ELdW 50" I* 7
SOP - 999 2* I
10CO - 4999 3* 1
•sooe - *"«» ** "
lf")0n - 24599 5* 1
250.">f, - 49999 6* T
5C01T - 99999 7* o
ncoor - 249999 s* i
250fiOO - 499999 9* "I
51POCC AND ABOVE T* 0
POPULATION SERVER 750
? ? 4 5 6 7 B o » •
*********
•» 3 3 I ? 2 " rt 112
nnorci^l^''""
n p f) r> Pi rj 351??ft«"ll 78T*ir">
i IZiro 23500 ?Cnrr 7«rrn 1Mr^ - ?B,5«n
«B I486?'''' 3?"
P7'>ri ^"0^3 ^45
0401 lO^""? 675"
"i 2 3 ? 3 3 " " * 132837^
5 4191^
r o •) 1 - ? 1 o * , to,?*
^P0r"?i^oi jfer i"
*HT^"1^^^1 fPftf'r
^^*l^Pp^*0"^
nco'%on^io"'>
ir5ro">r'>o""
Qflr" B6nO ?r""r 3S43" 9r295 2B51n •> 0 " 1933A5
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN OATF 68/12/16
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
196Z MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ALASKA
SEC ON 0 A R Y
M 0
TREATMENT
jr
-c-
OD
UNKNOWN
<=500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10COO-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
ri
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
I
H Of POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
C
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
10,000
0
0
0
o
0
10,000
TOTAL * OF
* OF COMMUNITIES
PLANTS IDENTIFIABLE
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
p
0
0
0
0
0
POPULA- NO. OF
TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SERVED TIF.S SERVED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
It
5
2
2
n
i
c
0
15
o
20
o
1,375
2.440
5,805
5,200
12, BOO
0
24,0^0
*>
-------
TABLE A-4B
1960 CENSUS
P R I MARY
1<>68 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
ALASKA
SECONDARY
N n
IMINAPV
TRFATMFNT
UNKNOWN
<-500
.p- 500-1000
cn
O 1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>5 00000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OP
PLANTS
0
3
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
SERVED
0
3
1
0
1
0
I
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
135
760
0
?tlOO
0
10.000
0
0
. 0
0
0
13,195
TnTAL * OF
• OF COMMUNITIES
PLANTS
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
\
1
n
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
n
1
PfPULA- NO. OF
TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
SFRVFf) TIFS SFPVFO
400
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
o
0
c
AOO
n
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
en
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ALASKA
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
\ n
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
u. ur r
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L0mi a i
1.6
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
IN 11 LC
l.B
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
V*A 1 CtoUK
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
T ^."CAI
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
v o
0
0
0
0
1
1 U urf
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
0
0
0
3
0
3
0
0
3
0
3
0
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
ro
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
ALASKA
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. Of
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0.5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
2
IN
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0. OF P
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
LANTS I
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
N 5IiE
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
CATEGOK
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
T <«RAT
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
ID Ul-l
1.0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
c
0
0
0
0
o
0
c
0
0
0
0
>4.0
0
0
c
0
P
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
-------
HUN DATE 68/12/20
SERVING COMM./FAC.
NO TREATMENT
PRIMARY
SECONDARY
POPULATION SERVED
TABLE A-7B
PRPLTMTN4RV
JOINT TRFATMFNT FACIIITIES
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
TPTAI S
COM. /FAT.
SFRVFD
cn
CO
SERVED COMM.
BELOW 50
5f»0 -
no* -
5I>00 -
tonoo -
251m -
K-vjn -
ncooo -
25030P -
5*0000 AND
POPULATION
/FAC.
0
999
4999
9999
24999
49999
99999
249999
499999
ABOVE
SERVED
-, r - n
Ifc-jp^iri^^"
2*lf>ClPrr>nn
3* o r> i ? r <• . n - n
4* 5 •» " « . " •»
. 5* -1 ft " T P 1 0 p ^
d^TOn^rn-i-"
yn, •> >• - ,T r p r\ ^ (-
g*ono-)rrT^-<
q* , P r ,,
o* •> r n »> n r« P
?^O?P^-'-«^
A
^
•\ ^ r
"
->
r
o - r
•> r „
«
r * r>
^ r r
^ ^ r
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATF 68/12/16
1960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL W*STE INVENTORY
HAWAtI
SFCONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-inoo
1000-2500
2500-5030
5000-10000
10COO-25000
25000-50000
50COO-1010CO
103000-25DOOO
250000-SOOuCO
>500COO
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
3
0
1
1
1
3
1
1
0
0
1
0
H
* OF PDPULA- TOTAL « OF POPULA- NO. HF
COMMUNITIES TION # OF COMMUNITIES TION COMMUNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED PLANTS IDENTIFIABLE SFRVED TIES SERVFO
0
0
1
0
1
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
75
0
500
12.C8C
4,020
8,725
n
0
P20
0
26,320
,>
2
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
9
0
2
0
n
0
c
t
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
340
0
0
300
6,750
«>,B5P
16,535
0
0
c
c
33,775
0
»
1
2
2
2
1
1
0
n
1
0
10
rt
«
500
2,700
5,225
15,325
4,225
5,100
0
0
269,000
0
302,075
-------
TABLE A-4B
1500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
1
2
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
P R I M A
R Y
* OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TI9N
SERVEO
1
2
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
15.9AO
lltOOO
0
0
600
2^00
0
6, WO
0
0
0
0
36,5*0
S F
TOTAL # OF POPULA- NO. OF
* OF COMMUNITIES TIPN COMMUNI- Pr>r>UL4TTOM
PLANTS SF&VFD TIPS «P«fn
10
1
0
1
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
14
A ? 5,600 0 0
1 't OCO ^ 0
0 0 1 "91?
1 2t ^f^f1 2 ' , T?*1
o r ' 5,c^o
n o ? ' 7,00^
1 ?4,POO 0 0
0 0 n 0
0000
0 P 0 0
0 0 1 1 f:0 f OOP
oono
7 44,000 7 ^7.5,700
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL HASTE INVENTORY
HAWAII
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO, OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<«500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
££ 5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
1
2
3
2
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
14
0
4
2
4
5
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
21
0.5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0
0
0
1
1
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
6
{NO. OF PLANTS IN
1.2 1.4 1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
SIZE
i.e
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
CATEGUK
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
T ^«KA!
2.5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
1 U J 1- 1
3.0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.3
0
1
0
i
0
1
0
0
3
0
3
0
4
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/11
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
HAWAII
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
-r-
cn
-j
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
1
2
3
2
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
14
0
4
2
4
5
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
21
0.5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.0
0
2
1
2
4
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
12
I n
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
u. ur v
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L A IN 1 3 1
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
n 31 ic
i.a
0
0
1
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
I.H I cvjur*
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 v
0
0
0
0
0
T N »r\» i
2.5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
iii ur r
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
n
0
0
2
0
c
0
o
0
0
o
0
2
>4.0
0
1
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
-------
OATE 69/12/?0
TABLE A-7B
PRFlIMTN8RV
cn
HAWAII
,inrNT TUFATMPHT
MUNICIPAL WAST*
THT«I
I ? *
* * *
SERVING COMM./p/vc. 100
NO TREATMENT n r r
PRIMARY . n •»
SFCONDARY n * "
P^ULATIHN SERVFO •) r> «
SERVSO CnMM./FAC. 0 * <"
BELOW 500 I* ? n "
500 - 999 2* 1 " f
ITOO - 4909 3* * f • r
5J)Oft - 9999 4* * A "
10000 - 24999 5* t r r
25TOO - 49999 6* 1 ^ r
50^00 - 99999 T* 1 f *
l^COOO - 249999 8* 1 " r
250000 - 499999 a* 1 " r
500000 AND ABOVE C* 0 " r
POPULATION SERVED o n ^
4 5 ft 7 R P 0
*******
r „ . n ?
•^p^n'inn^ r
^rnoAijn^ •
•)Pf»->«'f>«'''<
^r^T^fj^'f
I^C^^O^Pf
T^o^^rt"' r
<>r rii«r»*r*
T r „ , , c
^c^^^rt^^*
, r
->rr^"fl""r
'>?rr>"'
-------
TABLE A-2B
RUN DATE 66/12/16
I960 CENSUS
PRELIMINARY
PRIMARY
1962 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
PUERTO RICH
SECONDARY
N 0
TREATMENT
UNKNOWN
<-500
£2 500-1000
1000-250C
2500-5000
5030-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-10COOO
100000-25^000
250000-530300
4
>soo-;oo
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
0
I
11
16
5
I
"5
0
0
1
0
35
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITIES TION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED
0
0
1
11
16
5
1
0
0
0
1
0
35
0
0
280
2,895
7,505
4,610
1,165
0
0 •
0
5*, 660
0
75,115
TOTAL
# OF
PLANTS
0
0
1
8
8
5
I
1
0
0
0
0
24
# OF POPULA- NO. OF
COMMUNITIES TION COMMIJNI- POPULATION
IDENTIFIABLE SERVED TIES SERVED
0
0
1
8
8
*
1
1
f>
0
n
0
24
0
0
7C
1,709
7,125
4,745
850
5,340
n
o
r)
19,839
0
0
0
0
3
1
3
1
I
1
P
C
10
0
0
0
0
615
540
4,440
4,415
6,360
13,310
n
n
?6,680
-------
TABLE A-4B
1960 CENSUS
P R I MARY
MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
PUERTO R IC1
SECONDARY
N 0
PPFL IMtNAPY
TREATMFNT
-c-
(71
O
UNKNOWN
<»500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
* OF
PLANTS
0
0
I
11
16
4
1
0
0
0
I
0
34
# OF POPULA-
CHMMUNITteS TtON
SERVEO
0
0
1
11
16
4
1
0
0
0
1
0
34
0
0
2BO
11,995
21,314
10.3B5
1,200
0
0
0
450,000
0
495,174
TOTAL * OF PPPULA- NO. OF
* OF COMMUNITIFS T1PN COVIMIINI- onPULATION
PLANTS SFPVEO TIES SFP.VFO
0
0
1
8
B
t>
1
1
0
3
0
0
?5
f»
0
1
R
IS
1
1
0
0
0
0
25
0
0
1,145
71,150
26, MO
5,500
70^00
0
0
n
0
157.P55
n o
o *
n o
n A
? 40*
1 54*
1 4,440
1 4,415
A,?*1
1 ! Ot'l 0
n n
^ rt
= 96,^ftO
-------
TABLE A-5B
RUN DATE 69/02/12
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTF INVENTORY
PUERTO RICO
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMH. NO. OF
S«VD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
O500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
5
6
9
9
3
0
1
0
0
1
0
34
0
5
6
9
9
3
0
1
0
0
1
0
34
0.5
0
0
0
1
3
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
1.0
0
1
2
4
4
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
13
» N
1.2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
u. ut- v
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
L BIN 1 5 1
1.6
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
N i i tr
1.8
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
V.H 1 EUUH
2.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
T ^»K« 1
2.5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
I u u r i
3.0
0
1
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3.5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>t.D
0
3
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
-------
TABLE A-6B
HUN DATE 69/02/11
PRELIMINARY
en
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVFNTUKV
PUERTO RICO
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMH. NO. OF
SRVD PLANTS
UNKNOWN
0500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
5
7
18
16
5
2
1
0
0
1
0
55
0
5
7
18
16
5
2
1
0
0
1
0
55
0.5
0
0
1
7
10
2
2
1
. 0
0
1
0
24
1.0
0
1
1
4
5
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
IN
1.2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
O. Of P
1.4
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
LANTb I
1.6
0
0
0
2
0
0
c
c
0
0
0
0
2
IN Slit
1.8
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
1
CAI CliUK
2.0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
T *•««!
2.5
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
3
1U ur i
3.0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I
3.5
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
4.0
0
1
0
0
c
0
c
0
0
0
c
0
1
>4.0
0
'
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
2
-------
RUN OAT6 68/12/2C
TABLE A-7B
RtCP
JOINT TRFATMFNT FACUITIP?
MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
1 ? 3
* * *
SERVING COMW./FAC. 3 1 n
NO TREATMENT 1 n ft
PRIMARY •) r "
SECONDARY •, -. r
POPULATION SERVES ^ 0 ?
•C- *
CO ~
SERVED CO^M./FAC. T p. P
BELOW "500 1* ") 0 0
5{i(j _ ooo 2* 1 ^ T
mO - 4999 3* ft P P
5TO/? _ 9999 4* 1 (* f
10100 - 24999 5* 3 1 "
»5900 - 49909 6* 3 " P
50000 - ooooi) 7* 3 P n
100000 - 249999 8* 0 P C
250100 - 499°9!' 9* 3 ^ P
5000QP AND ABOVE 0* T ? "
POPULATION SERVEO 1 r r
4567*9"
*******
ftrpftjpftift
HPftftft.ftft.rr
1 n P * 1 P " 1 Sftfif."
^p^5T^rtr*^
nnrrir«if»
*)pn3^{»^«r
^•^rtft^r^rr
IP 0*^00^*
T^ft^rtfto'*f'
ir^i^rp^r"
T^A^rtOf^^
,7r^^"*ct^rn
^o?A^nof*f*
•^ r r* ^ l^?6r ^ * ** i^Ofc"
-------
1960 CENSUS
PRIMARY
TABLE A-48
1068 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
VIRGIN ISLANDS
SECONDARY
N 0
oofiIHJN&OY
TPEATMFNT
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
10000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
TOTAL
» OF
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
# OF POPULA-
COMMUNITFES TION
SERVED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
TOT&L * OF
* OF COMMUNITrFS
PLANTS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
POPUIA- NO. OF
TION COMK'JNI- PDPUI ATION
SERVFO TIF<5 SFPVCO
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n
0
0
0
0
n
n
0
n
1
n
1
1
0
n
n
0
n
,
n
o
0
If ?15
C
?,«*
?1,OC"
f>
n
0
0
0
11,7*«
-------
TABLE A-SB
RUN DATE 69/02/12
PRELIMIKARY
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
VIRGIN ISLANDS
DESIGN LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
COMM. NO
. OF
SRVO PLANTS
4T"
500000
TOTALS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
<=
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1.2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
nu« ur ri
1.4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
l_«m 13 1
1.6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
n 3 i cc
1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I*M i cuun
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I x-n** 1
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1 u ur I
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>4.3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
TABLE A-6B
RUN DATE 69/02/H
TOTAL
1968 MUNICIPAL WASTE INVENTORY
VIRGIN ISLANDS
INDICATED LOADING / DOMESTIC LOADING RATIO
PRELIMINARY
C01M. NO. OF
SRVO PLANTS
UNKNOWN
<-500
500-1000
1000-2500
2500-5000
5000-10000
07
13000-25000
25000-50000
50000-100000
100000-250000
250000-500000
>500000
TOTALS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
I NO. Of PLANTS IN SIZE
1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
CATEGOR
2.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Y «"RAT
2.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
in UM
3.0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
0
0
0
3.5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
0
0
*.o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
>*.o
0
0
0
0
0
0
c
c
0
0
0
0
0
-------
COMMENTS FRCM STATE AGENCIES
ON THE COST OF CLEAN WATER
467
339-CTt O - 69 - 31
-------
STATE OF ALASKA
Department of Health and Welfare
August 22, 1968
Mr. James Agee, Regional Director
Regional Office, Northwest Region
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Room 5?0, Pittock Block
Portland, Oregon 97205
Dear Mr. Agee:
The report "Cost of Clean Water," Volume IV, State and Major River Basin
Municipal Tables has been received and reviewed. It is a most interesting
and useful summary.
Comments noted during our review of the report may be useful to you, and
we are transmitting them for your use:
1. The footnote referenced for Alaska in the data on page
six of the report is incorrect. The current standards
require secondary treatment or its equivalent. In
instances where it may be demonstrated that the standards
can be met with primary treatment, the secondary treat-
ment may be waived.
2. The dollar value figures used for Alaska in the table
on page six are not current data and are exceedingly low.
The figures are apparently figures which were used prior
to adoption of the current standards.
3. Data for Alaska on page thirty-three is not consistent
with data for Alaska on page six. I assume that this is
simply a typographical error.
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment upon the report.
Sincerely yours,
James A. Anderegg, Chief
Branch of Environmental Health
JAAicac
468
-------
STATE OF ALASKA
Department of Health and Welfare
August 93 1968
Mr. James Agee, Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Northwest Region
Room 570, Pittock Block
Portland, Oregon 97205
Bear Mr. Agee:
The copy of "The Cost of Clean Water" Volume II, Detailed Analyses which
was sent to us by your office is very much appreciated. The report has
been reviewed and the following comment is offered:
1. Data for Alaska as shown in Table 1-3A are currently incorrent since
Alaska treatment requirements are essentially as expressed in assumption
number 2 on page k of the report. The Alaska figure should probably be
increased by a factor of approximately 20 to 30 percent to correct this
error.
2. It also appears that the figures in Table 1-3A have not been adequately
adjusted to accommodate the higher construction costs extant in Alaska.
With adjustment for higher costs, the figure shown should be increased
approximately i|0 percent.
3. The footnote about Alaska, shown on page 13 should be changed to reflect
the content of current standards.
ll. It is doubtful if it would be correct, other than for ease for computation,
to group Alaska with the West as shown in the Analyses on page 28 of the
. report.
5. Holding tank analyses as shown on pages 30 and 31 may not be applicable
•• in those parts of Alaska where permafrost exists.
6. The figures shown for Alaska on page 38 are only about twenty percent
of the current need and should be increased appropriately.
7. Table 11 - 1 on pages 60 and 6l should be expanded to reflect conditions
in one of the most important industries in the Pacific Northwest, namely
the seafood industry. This industry is one of the most significant
industries in Alaska and blanketing it in under SIC code 203 information,
if this is where it is included would not place adequate attention on the
problems of wastes from this industry.
469
-------
Mr. James Agee -2- August 9, 1968
8. ¥e are not aware that sufficient work has been done in establishing a
profile of wastes from the seafood industry to meaningfully include it
in the composite of information contained under the heading of "Food
and Kindred Products" shown in the Table H - 7 shown on page 7li of
the report. ¥e assume of course that this is the category under which
seafood waste data would appear. There is a dearth of information,
reliable or otherwise, on flows and strengths of seafood wastes.
9. We would be interested in knowing the intended units for nomenclature on
the chart shown on page 80.
10. In Alaska we are, to some degree, heat conscious in design and operation
of facilities. Waste heat is waste money. We emphasize heat salvage
and use which helps prevent pollution by the most useful of all techniques
elimination of the pollution at the source rather than later trying to
make corrections. In the conclusions on page 137> it would appear worth-
while to mention the importance of heat salvage where possible and the
achievement of a double benefit.
Thank you for making it possible for us to comment upon the report and if
we may provide any further information, please advise.
Sincerely yours,
J. Scott McDonald
Commissioner
AJArslb
470
-------
STATE OF ALASKA
Department of Health and Welfare
February 15, 1968
Mr. R. F. Poston, Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Regional Office
Room 570, Pittock Block
Portland, Oregon 97205
Dear Sir:
This refers to your letter of January 30, 1968, which forwarded the
summary report, "The Cost of Clean Water" and asked for our review
and comments on the cost estimates of this report.
Our 1968 Alaska State Program Plan for Water Pollution Control lists
18 communities requiring secondary treatment with an estimated total
cost of $35-1 million. This total and the rough estimates for those
communities, not in the foregoing plan but listed in the Water Quality
Standards, which amounts to about $1.25 million, totals $36.35 million.
These rough figures in present dollars include not only treatment but the
necessary sewer collection system. They do not include industrial plants
(pulp nri 1Is and chemical plants) nor costs for the approximately 80 sea-
food processors located outside of communities that will eventually have
sewage treatment of some sort. Note that these costs are very rough
since in most of these localities construction figures are most difficult
to obtain and often vary widely as to availability of construction talents
in the area.
To demonstrate examples of the relatively high development costs, please
note that the Carlanna Lake District addition at Ketchikan (sewer system
only) for a present population of about 525 (ultimate, 3,000) will cost
$51*8,000. At North Pole (population of 625, ultimate about 1,200), system
plus treatment is estimated at $593,000. Eagle River, an Anchorage
subdivision, estimates collection and treatment at $3,970,000 for a
population of 6,000, ultimately.
It appears, based on the foregoing, that the Capital Outlays needed
(Table 2, page 11 of the report) for Alaska should be revised upward.
Further, that Table 5 (page 15) has no relation to costs in this State.
Sincerely yours,
J. Scott McDonald
Commissioner
JSM:cf
-------
STATE OF ARIZONA
Arizona State Department of Health
March 1, 1968
William B. Schreeder, Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, 13SDI
Southwest Region
100 McAllister Street
San Francisco, California 9i*102
Dear Mr. Schreeder:
Members of our staff have performed a cost estimate for waste
treatment facilities which was similar in content to the one in
Volume I. Our results corresponded to yours within a few percent,
We are anticipating receiving Volumes II, HI and 17 so that we
also may analyze cost figures in greater detail.
Sincerely,
Edmund C. Garthe
Director and Chief Engineer
Division of Environmental Health
472
-------
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Division of Water Quality
April 3, 1968
Mr. William B. Schreeder
Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Adm.
100 McAllister Street
San Francisco, California 9^4102
Dear Mr. Schreeder:
Enclosed are two copies of a report titled "An Estimate of Sewerage
Facility Needs for California Public Agencies, 1968-1972 Volume I".
This is a summary report of California's sewerage facility needs.
Tou requested information on significant differences between cost
estimates in the federal and state's reports. Tou will note that in
spite of the different methods of arriving at estimated needs, California's
five year estimated needs for sewage treatment facilities (exclusive of
collection systems) is $530 million. This is in fair agreement with the
estimated need presented in your report of $61j5.2 million.
However, we do not agree with the findings given in columns 3 and h of
Table 2 of your report.
The report estimates that the upgrading of California's facilities to
secondary treatment in the next five years will require only $2 million.
This figure is far too low as we know that the City of Sacramento project
cost for providing secondary treatment is in excess of $7 million.
Column ij. lists California's needs for providing facilities for untreated
urban wastes as $370.5 million. This is misleading and implies that
many of California's urban areas are without any treatment facilities.
We conclude that this figure provides for sewering all areas now served
by septic tanks.
We would be glad to discuss these reports further with you.
Sincerely,
Paul R. Bonderson, Chief
Division of Water Quality
473
-------
STATE OF COLORADO
Department of Public Health
February 19, 1968
Mr. Gaiy L. Fisk
Acting Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
IT. S. Department of the Interior
601 East 12th Street
Kansas City, Missouri 6i|106
Dear Mr. Fisk:
We have reviewed "Volume 1, Summary Report, The Cost of Clean Water" as
requested by your letter of January 2k, 1968.
We have no comments or corrections to make on the cost estimates as shown
in the report.
We do not agree with Table 3, page 12, of the report. Based upon our field
inspections and test data, the report is quite erroneous. We do not know
the source of the data, but we refer you to Part D, Plan of Implementation
of our report "Stream Classification for Surface Waters of Colorado"
June, 1967, copies previously furnished all FWPCA offices. Table 1
(revised November, 196?) and Table 2 give the status of domestic wastes in
Colorado. Since the November revision, Fort Collins, population 31,000,
and Pueblo, population 97,000, have completed additional sewage treatment
works, We request that Table 35 page 12, of the FWPCA report be revised
as follows for Colorado:
Total Urban population 1,801,000
Population with adequate treatment 1,1;89,000
Population with less than adequate treatment 312,000
Population with no treatment 10,000
Percentage of population with less than adequate or
no treatment 17.3
Please make the above corrections and furnish us with a copy of the revised
report or errata sheets.
Very truly yours,
FOR DIRECTOR, WATER POLLUTION CONTROL DIVISION
Earl T. Balkura, P.E.
Associate Public Health Engineer
ETBrmgc
474
-------
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
Water Resources Commission
April 10, 1968
Mr. Lester M. Klashman
Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
John F. Kennedy Federal Building
Boston, Massachusetts 02203
Dear Mr. Klashman:
Reference is made to your recent letter requesting our comments
on the publication "The Cost of Clean Water", Volume I, Summary Report.
Our comments are limited to Tables II and III on pages 11 and 12
respectively and the second paragraph on page 16.
We note that the estimated Total (Current Dollars) needed to obtain
adequate municipal waste water treatment in Connecticut is 188.3 million
dollars. Our cost estimates indicate that 200 million dollars is more
accurate figure, however, we do not have readily available a further
breakdown of this figure as in Table II. Our per-project cost estimates
were submitted to you as part of our Fiscal Tear 1968 Program Plan Grant
'_ Application.
By policy the Water Resources Commission uses a 20-year design
period for ^11 municipal waste treatment facilities. Therefore, we do
not concur with the 5-year period used in Table II, as indicated by
footnote number 1, and on page 16.
With respect to Table III, we do not know the basis on which the
Total Urban Population figure is obtained. Inasmuch as our total State
population is now just a shade under 3 million, the 2.31*2 million urban
population figure appears quite high. Based on a per capita contribution
of 100 gallons per day and our total estimated municipal waste water flow,
it appears that this figure would be closer to 2 million. On this same
basis, our flow figures would indicate adequate treatment is being provided
for 570,000 people, less than adequate for 1,360,000 people, and no
treatment for under 100,000 people. We, therefore, disagree completely
with the 7l|it,000 figure in the next to last column in Table III. We presume
that such a large figure is arrived at through the use of such a figure
as Total Urban Population which in itself does not indicate directly areas
which must be sewered and definitely not the population contributing to raw
475
-------
Mr. Lester M. KLashman -2- April 10, 1968
sewage discharges. Any layman reading this publication would certainly
feel that this last column indicates that sewage from this population is
now discharged untreated, when actually it is merely the figure resulting
from subtracting population with adequate and less than adequate treatment
from the rather questionable figure of total urban population. We
consider this a misrepresentation of the problem which actually exists.
From our flow figures the Percentage of Population with less than Adequate
or None is approximately 70%.
We certainly hope that in the future more care and accuracy will
be used in developing such publications.
Very truly yours,
Merwin E. Hupfer
Principal Sanitary Engineer
MEH:jch
476
-------
STATE OF DELAWARE
Water and Air Resources Commission
May 29, 1968
Mr. Rocco D. Ricci, P.E., Chief
Construction Grants Activities
N.Y., N.J., &Del.
Federal Water Pollution Control
Administration
Edison, New Jersey 08817
Dear Mr. Ricci:
I regret the delay in submitting our critique of the report entitled
"The Cost of Clean Water." However, I hope the following will meet your
needs.
We were very pleased at the attempt made by the Federal Water Pollution
Control Administration to undertake the task of finding out what the cost
of clean water is. It is a large and unenviable task and we recognize that
there are definite problems in assessing the cost of clean water. If, as is
repeatedly said, the citizen is interested in clean water regardless of cost,
our commitment should be towards quick and effective implementation with
cooperation among all concerned.
However, we find that there are some changes proposed in the financing
structure of the present Construction Grants Program which will seriously
hinder our efforts in meeting the water quality standards within a reasonable
period of time. We strongly support the present method of financing with
increased outlays from the Federal government as required, thereby eliminating
the need for new guidelines, rules and application forms and the resulting
confusion.
It is difficult to question the estimated cost of construction of
Municipal waste treatment plants and interceptor sewers for the entire
nation. However, we find that the basis used for arriving at such costs,
namely, the 1962 inventory of municipal water treatment was a poor choice.
The information contained in that report does not reflect the existing
conditions as far as Delaware is concerned. For example, in Table No. 2,
$b.5> million were allocated for construction of facilities for untreated
Hastes in Delaware. This figure is not valid because there are practically
no untreated municipal wastes going into our waterways. The cost of up-
grading certain existing facilities may be reasonable and more exact
estimates will be available after receipt of preliminary plans from each
Municipality under orders to upgrade treatment.
477
-------
Mr. Bocco D. Ricci, P.E., Chief
Construction Grants Activities
May 29, 1968
Page 2
In Table No. 3, it is claimed that the percentage of the population
with less than adequate or no treatment for Delaware is 97.5 percent.
This analysis is again based on the 1962 inventory and misrepresents the
conditions in Delaware.
The total population of the State for the year 196? is estimated at
approximately 5>27,000. Of the three counties, New Castle County is the
most populous with 376, COO persons. Kent and Sussex Counties have
approximately 8l,f?00 and 78,J>00 persons respectively. The New Castle
County sewer system, which is connected to the Wilmington sewage treatment
plant, serves approximately 33li,000 persons. As you are aware, the Wilming-
ton treatment plant is adding aeration units to raise the level of treatment
and to meet the water quality standards by 1972.
In Kent County, approximately 38,300 persons live in municipalities
and approximately 3U,300 persons are served by town sewer systems, most of
which provide secondary treatment. In Sussex County, approximately 26,^00
live in municipalities and about 21,600 are served by town sewer systems,
all having at least primary treatment and some with secondary treatment.
Those without secondary treatment are under orders to provide additional
treatment, except the Town of Milton.
From this information, it can be seen that approximately 7h percent
of the State's population is served by sewer systems all having at least
primary treatment. The remaining 26 percent live in sparsely populated
rural areas which cannot economically support large-scale sewer systems.
By including them in the population figure with less than adequate
treatment, as shown in Table No. 3, a true picture of the conditions in
Delaware is not presented. Of the 390,000 persons presently served by
the sewer system 36,100 have secondary treatment. Approximately 332,^00
will have intermediate treatment by June 1968. The remaining 18,300 are
under orders to provide secondary treatment by 1972. The two exceptions
claimed under water quality standards abatement plan are Delaware City
with a population of 1,653 and the Town of Milton with a population of
For your information, a report entitled "Delaware's Population 1967"
is enclosed.
The time base used; namely, 5 years, for reaching the water quality
standards is, in our opinion, by and large unrealistic. With the tight
money situation, Federal financing problems and shortage of engineers,
we feel that the 1972 deadline as required by the Federal Water Pollution
Control Administration will not be met. A realistic time base of 10 to
l£ years must be used in most cases.
478
-------
Mr. Eocco D. Ricci, P.E., Chief
Construction Grants Activities
May 29, 1968
Page 3
By 1980, in most highly urbanized and industrialized regions,
secondary treatment may not be sufficient to meet the water quality
standards and we feel that tertiary treatment will be required. With
tertiary treatment, the true cost of clean water will jump significantly.
Although storm water treatment may be preferred in large metropolitan
areas, there are a number of small towns which could quite easily separate
their storm and sanitary sewers at minimum cost. Such separation should
be encouraged and an attempt should be made to differentiate large
metropolitan areas and the small towns.
The wastes from agricultural sources, such as feed lots and farm
runoff, are not significant in Delaware at the present time. However,
in view of the difficulty in controlling certain natural sources of
pollution, we have to recognize the fact that there is a base level of
water quality beyond which further enhancement is not possible.
If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact us.
Very truly yours,
N. C. Vasuki, P.E.
Assistant Director
NCV:my
479
-------
GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA
Department of Public Health
March 21, 1968
Mr. Lloyd W. Gebhard
Regional Director
U. S. Department of the Interior
Federal Water Pollution Control
Administration
Middle Atlantic Region
918 Emmet Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Dear Mr. Gebhard:
Reference is made to your letter dated January 2£, 1968 in
which you request our review of "The Cost of Clean Water, Volume
1. Table 2, page 11 shows the current and constant dollar
capital outlays for the District of Columbia (F.Y. 1969-1973)
to be 23.0 and 21. k million dollars, respectively. Current
estimates by the D. C. Department of Sanitary Engineering put
the value of improvements to the D. C. Water Pollution Control
Plant at 143.7 million dollars during fiscal years 1969 through
1973.
2. Footnote 3 should include a similar statement concerning
Maryland.
If we can be further assistance, please let me know.
Very truly yours,
William H. Gary, Jr., P.H.
Associate Director for Environmental
Health
480
-------
STATE OF HAWAII
Department of Health
March 53 1968
Mr. William B. Schreeder
Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
100 McAllister Street
San Francisco, California 9ljl02
Dear Mr. Schreeder:
On January 23 you forwarded to us two copies of a Report entitled
"The Cost of Clean Water," Volume I, for review and comment as to any-
significant differences between the cost estimates in the report and our
own cost estimates. On February 26 you wrote us a follow-up letter
concerning the information requested.
The listing relative to Hawaii in Table 2 on page 11 of the Report
grossly underestimates the probable cost for construction of municipal
waste treatment plant and intercepting facilities to attain water quality
standards during the 5> year period FY 1969-1973. A total capital outlay of
$35-!? million (constant dollars) is indicated in Table 2 for Hawaii. This
figure, in our opinion, underestimates the probable capital outlay when
applied only to the needed treatment-disposal facilities. The probable
cost would more likely approach 90 million dollars with the intercepting
facilities included in the cost projections.
Very sincerely.
WALTER B. QUISENBERRI, M.D.
Director of Health
481
-------
CHAMBERS
Honolulu
April 26, 1968
Dear Mr. Halesnik:
Thank you for the Report on the Cost of Clean Waters -which was sent
to me on April 9, 1968. I appreciate the need for such a comprehensive
analysis of the national problem and also the difficulties associated
with and the efforts involved in such an undertaking.
Unfortunately, the information contained in this kind of Report is
often extrapolated beyond the scope originally intended. For example,
on April 18, 1968 an article appeared in our local morning paper -which
stated in part that "The U. S. Department of the Interior has estimated
it will cost between $35> million and $ljD million to obtain adequate
municipal waste treatment for Hawaii. The figure, representing a five
year period between fiscal years 1969 and 1973, is contained in a new
report, "The Cost of Clean Water," presented to Congress earlier this
year ..... This figure contrasts with earlier predictions for Hawaii
which ranged from a low $60 million to a high of $500 million. The $£00
million figure was pulled out of a hat during Hawaii's debate over water
quality standards for the State . . . ."
On page 3 of Volume H (Detailed Analyses) of the Report I received,
the basic assumptions involved in your study are given. The assumptions
are: (l) Adequate treatment to attain water quality standards is required
for the total urban population of the United States; (2) Adequate treatment
is defined as at least secondary type of waste treatment, except for those
areas where primary waste treatment has been or is likely to be approved
as conforming to water quality standards; and (3) Municipal waste treatment
essential for the standards will be attained nationally by the end of
Fiscal Tear 1973.
The $£00 million figure referred to above was expressed as being
representative of the magnitude of the problems involved, in the opinion
of the representatives of the county governments here, if the severest
interpretation of the requirements contained in our Standards then being
developed were to be applied in Hawaii and all of the needed public works
in response to such requirements were to be accomplished by June 31* 1973.
If the "municipal waste treatment essential for the Standards" is to be
attained nationally and locally by the aid of Fiscal Tear 1973 > then the
$35 million figure referred to in the Report as representing Hawaii's costs
to construct the needed municipal treatment plants and interceptor sewers
would appear to me to be far too low.
482
-------
Page 2
comments are not intended to be a criticism of your efforts in
having prepared this Report. As a practical matter, the $3£ million figure
that you indicate would probably come close in approximating the public
works level for sanitary facilities to be initiated in Hawaii during the
period, Fiscal Years 1969-1973, although as I have indicated earlier, this
would by no means accomplish the objective that municipal waste treatment
essential for the Standards be attained by the end of Fiscal Year 1973.
With warm personal regards. May the Almighty be with you and yours
always.
Sincerely,
Mr. Richard P. Nalesnik
Director, : Program Review and Evaluation Staff
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Washington, D. C. 202142
483
3»-£7« O - 69 - 32
-------
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Sanitary Water Board
May 29, 1968
FWPCA - Cost Estimates
Mr. Allan Hirsch
Federal Water Pollution Control Assoc.
633 Indiana Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20203
Dear Mr. Hirsch:
We have reviewed your letter of April 19, 1968 inquiring regarding the
basis for assembling cost estimates of sewage works needs through year 1980.
Our tabulation totaled $556.5 million for period 1969-1971 vs Department of
Interior total estimate of $399. li million. Our basic curves were developed
from basic actual construction cost data from 1952 to 1962 and construction
under the PL 660 grant program 1957 to 1967. These curves were then projected
on the basis of backlog of grant applications and anticipated construction
needs.
The Anticipated Sewage Treatment Needs values are demographically
distributed projections of demonstrated construction costs data adjusted to
reflect increased costs, enhanced treatment, population variances, and
governmental assistance functions. Base data is that reported in publications
of the United States Public Health Service and the Federal Water Pollution
Control Administration, along with information contained in the files of the
Illinois Department of Public Health. Verification and control was exercised
by comparative studies with information obtained through detailed studies of
six counties typifying characteristic areas of the State. Population figures
were obtained from the TTIinois Department of Business and Economical
Development.
Values for known construction costs for waste treatment in Illinois were
plotted by year. Although the limited data evidenced scatter a linear projection
was applied. This projection was altered in consideration of changing treat-
ment requirements reflecting treatment enhancement demand, increases in costs
and population, as well as the effects of State and Federal assistance programs.
It is obvious that the course of these variables cannot be definitively
determined and therefore these estimates should be subjected to review and
revision with the advent of additional experience. Although the resulting
adjusted curve is comprised of four linear segments, values for the total state
were extrapolated directly from the graph without attempting equation derivation.
Total state values were demographically distributed by county.
484
-------
FWPCA - Cost Estijnates -2- May 29, 1968
Mr. All an Hirsch
Washington, D. C.
Sewage collection costs were determined to approximate seventy-three
per cent (73$) of the sewage treatment facility costs. Hence, this factor
was applied to sewage treatment needs values to determine total anticipated
costs for sewage collection and treatment needs in Illinois during the
subject years.
Very truly yours,
C. W. KLassen
Technical Secretary
DBM:mh
485
-------
STATE OF KANSAS
State Department of Health
October 30, 1968
Mr. John M. Rademacher
Acting Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Adm.
9H Walnut' Street-Room 702
Kansas City, Missouri 61ilo6
Re: Comments regarding U.S. Department of Interior
(FWPCA) publications - The Cost of Clean Water.
Volume I thru IV.
Dear Mr. Rademacher:
We believe the above referenced publications are a valuable guide
which could be used in estimating the cost of broad scale treatment
•works. However, to date we have not sufficiently utilized the
publications to warrant their compilation.
Sincerely yours,
Environmental Health Services
LaVern R. Heble, P.E.
Acting Chief
Water Pollution Control Section
LRH:jf
486
-------
STATE OF MAINE
Water and Air Environmental
Improvement Commission
March 19, 1968
Mr. Lester A, Button
Construction Grants Program Director
United States Department of Interior
Federal Water Pollution Control Admin.
Northeast Region
JFK Federal Building (Eoom 2303)
Boston, Massachusetts 02203
Attention: Mr. Stuart C. Peterson, Chief
New England Section
Gentlemen:
Subject: "The Cost Of Clean Waters" Volume I Summary Report
.*
This letter is in reply to Mr. Klashman's letter dated February 2,
1968 relative to the subject report. After reviewing the report and
especially tables 2 and 3 on pages 11 and 12, respectively, the only
comment we have is that the total published costs and other pertinent
data does not in our opinion come close to approximating the true cost
of needed sewerage and waste treatment facilities for the State of Maine.
The published costs seems to have ignored completely the costs as pre-
sented in the State Plan and also previous tabulations of costs which
have been submitted to the Regional Office of the Federal Water Pollu-
tion Control Administration and to the best of our knowledge were for-
warded to the Washington Office.
No additional detailed costs are being submitted at this time as
we believe your, office presently has all of this information on file.
Very truly yours,
George G. Gormley
Civil Engineer
Planning and Grant Programs
Water & Air Environmental
Improvement Commission
GCG:lm
487
-------
STATE OF MAHTLAND
Department of Health
March 19, 1968
Mr. Iloyd W. Gebhard, Begional Program Director
United States Department of the Interior
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
918 Bumet Street
Charlottes-Tine, Virginia 22901
Dear Mr. Gebhard:
This -will acknowledge receipt of five copies of "The Cost of Clean
Water - Volume HI, Industrial Waste Profiles." The material contained
in these booklets will be of considerable help to us as we work with
communities where industrial wastes are involved.
Tou win recall that you forwarded us copies of Volume I in the
latter part of January and that Mr. Coulter informed you that this
material had been referred to our Division for analysis. We withheld
comments assuming that Volumes U, IH, and IV would be available within
•a few weeks. As we still have not received all of this material, we
will comment on Volume I at this time.
On Page 1$, Table .£, it gives the per capita cost for various types
of projects, but for some reason does not show any cost figures where
secondary treatment is provided with trickling filters. As this type of
treatment could vary considerably from the figures provided for activated
sludge, we are of the opinion that some cost data should be made available.
In the same Table, the cost of stabilization ponds is shown with the
notation that land costs are not included. As land costs are frequently
a major item when these ponds are utilized, we are of the opinion that these
costs should be included even though they are not eligible for Federal
participation.
Although the figures given for costs are an average and are based
on projects constructed under Public Law 660, the varying wage rates would
have a heavy impact on these costs. At the present time, these rates for
common labor in Maryland vary from $1.5>0 to $3.10, so that using an average
figure would not be of much help to us when we are discussing probable
costs with communities that are planning to proceed with a sewerage project.
Very truly yours,
Thomas W. Shives, Chief
Division of Water and Sewerage
488
-------
STATE OF MAHTLAND
Department of Health
February 2, 1968
Mr. Lloyd W. Gebhard, Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Department of the Interior
918 JQnmet Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Dear Mr. Gebhard:
Thank you for the two copies of Volume I, "The Cost of
Clean Water." I read the report "with great interest and already it
has been extremely helpful to us in the justification of Maryland's
proposed Comprehensive Water Pollution Control Act.
From my cursory examination, it appears that the cost
estimates are very close to those we have developed. However, I
have passed the report along to Mr. Thomas W. Shives and his staff
with a request that they make a thorough analysis. Of course, their
analysis cannot be completed until we receive Volumes II, III and IV.
We would appreciate receiving them at the earliest possible time.
Sincerely yours,
James B. Coulter
Assistant Commissioner
Environmental Health Services
489
-------
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Water Resources Commission
February 7, 1968
Mr. Lester M. Klashman
Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Adm.
John F. Kennedy Building
Boston, Massachusetts 02203
Dear Mr. Klashtnan:
Thank you for sending us a copy of "The Cost of Clean Water," Volume I,
Summary Report. This report represents a lot of work, but based on informa-
tion available, I question the accuracy of some of the figures -which are
summarized.
In my opinion, the Total Capital Outlays Needed for urban areas of
Massachusetts as listed on page 11 as $200 million, are low. We estimate
the costs as being between $1^00 and $f?00 million. I would appreciate
receiving a break down of how the $200 million figure was arrived at so
that we can see where the large difference is. We would also like to know
what towns and cities are classified as urban areas.
This information is misleading as the entire state needs are not listed
and there are many problems in rural areas as well. The financial needs of
the smaller towns are more critical than some of the larger communities with
a large tax base. In determining water pollution control needs, the entire
state should be considered and not just urban areas.
Until such time as more information is available, we recommend these
figures be used with caution.
Very truly yours,
Thomas C. McMahon
Director
TCM:RFG:B
490
-------
STATE OF MISSODEI
The Department of Public Health and Welfare
February 8, 1968
Garry L. Fisk, P.E.
Acting Regional Program Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
601 East 12th Street
Kansas City, Missouri 61jlo6
This is in reply to your letter of January 2h, 1968. We have
reviewed the report entitled "The Cost of Clean Water." We
believe that the cost estimates presented in the report are
reasonably accurate.
Jack K. Smith
Executive Secretary
Missouri Water Pollution Board
JKS/ih
491
-------
STATE OF NEVADA.
Department of Health and Welfare
March 1, 1968
Mr. William B. Schreeder
Regional Director
Federal tetter Pollution Control Adrn. - USDI
100 McAllister Street
San Francisco, California 910-02
Dear Mr. Schreeder:
The report entitled "Cost of Clean Water" contained far more
cost information concerning projects than we have available for
anticipated projects.
The basis for your cost estimate might be questioned, but at this
time, we have no comments or corrections to offer on the report.
Very truly yours,
E. G. Gregory, Chief
Bureau of Environmental Health
EGGtmj
492
-------
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Water Supply and Pollution Control Commission
February 20, 1968
Mr. Lester M. Klashman
Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Admin.
John F. Kennedy Federal Office Bldg.
Boston, Massachusetts' 02203
Attention: Mr. Lester A. Button
Re: The Cost of Clean Water,
Vol. 1, Summary Report
Dear Mr. Klashman:
We appreciate receiving a copy of the report on "Cost of Clean
Water," and take this opportunity to comment on its contents as follows:
1. The April 196? Summary Sheet for New Hampshire shows
total costs to meet classification requirements as $129,966,000.
These estimates are based on preliminary engineering reports,
final plans or bid prices. Revisions as of February l£, 1968
(increased construction costs and project alterations) bring
estimated costs to $138,700,000.
2. Urban population in New Hampshire based on January 1,
1968 estimates is !?l5,000. This is over 100,000 in excess
of the estimate as shown on Table 3.
A capital outlay of 35 million dollars as shown in the first
column of Table 2, is completely unrealistic, and the entire table is
so filled with inaccuracies as to be of little value, and possibly damag-
ing to the total pollution abatement program, if used as an authorative
source of information.
We regret that the Department of the Interior chose to ignore
our tabulation of costs submitted in 1967* but for future reference we
enclose our summary sheet referred to under 1.
Sincerely yours,
C. W. Metcalf, Director
Municipal Services
CWM/mfh
493
-------
STATE OF NEW
Department of Health
February 16, 1968
United States Department of the Interior
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Northeast Region
John F. Kennedy Federal Office Building
Boston, Massachusetts 02203
Attention: Mr. Lester M. Klashman, Regional Director
Gentlemen:
Thank you for your letter of February 2, 1968 and Volume I, Summary Report
entitled "The Cost of Clean Water" dated January 10, 1968.
I realize that the Department of Interior was obligated to submit this report
to the Congress by January of this year and that the report itself admits
to a number of significant shortcomings.
It is my firm conviction that cost estimates for pollutional control,
prevention and abatement cannot be determined by placing emphasis on review
and analyses of national statistics, surveys, etc.
Such information can only be established after a total program plan including
quality standards, water classification and program implementation has been
developed and initiated by the States.
New Jersey has done this. In addition, we have funded $1,^00,000 for regional
engineering sewerage feasibility studies which have already provided us with
the engineering and economic basis for the furtherance of multimunicipal
regional water pollution control concepts. Cost analyses incorporated in
these studies are obviously much more significant and valid, particularly
since they relate directly to our program planning, than a series of statistics
which may be totally unrelated to what New Jersey is attempting.
Based upon information obtained through these studies, together with our
estimate of what the remaining several contemplated engineering studies will
reveal, leads us to the conclusion that it win cost $800,000,000 during the
nert five years to construct trunk sewers, interceptors, force mains and
treatment facilities. This will be necessary in order for New Jersey's water
pollution program goals to be realized.
494
-------
To: Mr. Lester M. KLashman, Regional Director Page 2
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration February 16, 1968
Regionalization is one of our principal aims. We have taken a firm stand in
this regard and, as a matter of fact, have recently received a favorable court
decision upholding our position. It takes great sums of money to build
regional trunk lines, interceptors, outfalls, etc. to meet anticipated needs
forty years hence. These costs are certainly reflected in the overall
estimate furnished above. Whether other heavily populated States are as firmly
committed to this concept of pollution control remains to be determined.
There are a number of other statements or items in the report that require
clarification or correction. This is particularly significant because of
developments that have occurred in New Jersey during the past several years as
compared to information available through inventories made seven or eight years
ago.
After we have had an opportunity to review Volumes II, III and IV, it would
seem appropriate to meet with members of your staff to discuss ways of improving
and refining next year's publication.
Very truly yours,
Richard J. Sullivan, Director
Division of Clean Air and Water
495
-------
STATE OF HEW YORK
Department of Health
April 10, 1968
Mr. Lester M. KLashman
Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Northeast Region
John F. Kennedy Federal Building
Boston, Massachusetts 02203
Dear Mr. Klashmant
The delay in responding to your request of February 2, 1968 for our
comments on "The Cost of Clean Water, Volume I, Summary Report" is sincerely
regretted.
We are in agreement with the statement made by Secretary Udall
in his letters of transmittal to the Congress that the report will not settle
conclusively the complex and difficult question of the cost of water pollution
control. It will, however, point up the financial and practical magnitude of
the problem.
Since the information supporting the findings in the report is con-
tained in the more detailed reports (Volume H, III and IV) which are not yet
available to this office, it is not possible to determine how the cost estimates
were computed. It is of course, recognized that the costs are not all inclusive
as is admitted in the study.
Without the benefit of the supporting data and assuming that the means
of estimating are valid and complete it would be the opinion of the New York State
Department of Health that the study is a point of beginning which should become
more accurate and realistic in succeeding years.
With particular reference to Table 2 on page 11 we are not in agree-
ment with two of the estimates shown for New York State. They are as follows with
the comparable New York State estimate.
($ Millions)
Report New York Estimate
Total (current Dollars) $1,070.2 $2,06£
Upgrading of Facilities 266.0 £00.9
Comparable figures for the capital outlays in New York State delineated
in the last three columns of the Table are not available.
496
-------
Mr. Lester M. Klashman Page -2- April 10, 1968
If the comparison of costs is similar throughout the nation, the
estimate in the Summary and Conclusions of $8.0 billion (exclusive of land and
associated costs) to construct municipal waste treatment plants and interceptor
sewers would then appear to be totally inadequate.
The opportunity afforded this office to review and comment on the
report is appreciated.
Very tnGy yours,
John G. Haberer, P.E.
Acting Assistant
Commissioner
497
-------
STATE OF NOETH CAROLINA
Department of Water and Air Resources
August l£, 1968
Mr. F. R. Blaisdell
Deputy Regional Director
Middle Atlantic Region, FWFCA
U. S. Dept. of the Interior
918 Emmet Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Dear Mr. Blaisdell:
Reference is made to your letter of August 1, requesting our
comments on reports relating to The Cost of Clean Water.
We have reviewed the reports in question and have no comments
to offer with respect to the material presented. The cost estimates
given in these reports for North Carolina seem to be in line with
our own projections. We appreciate receiving copies of these reports
and wish to thank you for the opportunity of reviewing them.
Sincerely yours,
E. C. Hubbard
Assistant Director
498
-------
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
State Department of Health.
October 30, 1968
Mr. John M. Rademacher
Acting Regional Director, Missouri Basin
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Department of the Interior
911 Walnut Street, Room 702
Kansas City, Missouri 61jlo6
Re: Reviewal of Publication Entitled,
"The Cost of Clean Water"
Dear Mr. Rademacher s
This Department has reviewed the publication entitled, "The Cost of
Clean Water" and the information contained relative to the State of North
Dakota appears to be reasonable as to estimates of future costs for waste
treatment, operating costs, and other such information.
Sincerely,
Norman L. Peterson, Director
Division of Water Supply and
Pollution Control
NtP:ls
499
-------
STATE OF OKLAHOMA,
State Department of Health
March 20, 1968
Mr. William C. Galegar
Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U. S. Department of the Interior
South Central Eegion
Uj02 Elm Street - Third Floor
Dallas, Texas 7^202
Dear Mr. Galegar:
In reply to your letter of February 21, 1968, concerning the
publication, "The Cost of Clean Water," the following comments are indicated.
In Table 2, Page 11, the total cost indicated for construction
of municipal waste treatment facilities was 60.5 million dollars. On the
basis of our current records as indicated in the revised form FWPCA-131
submitted to your office November 16, 1967, this figure should be 78.8
million dollars. The breakdown information as shown in Table 1 for this
amount is not, however, available in our records and we would assume this
is based on national averages.
In Table 3, Page 12, the population figure for those with
collection systems and no treatment plant should be revised downward from
163,000 to I&k7> since I^an, Bixby, and Coweta are the only remaining towns
with no treatment. These communities all have projects in various stages
of planning. The difference could be proportioned between the columns
entitled, "Adequate" and "Less than adequate" as an estimate pending a plant
by plant evaluation with respect to adequacy.
If further information is needed, please feel free to call upon us.
Very truly yours,
Loyd F. Pummill, Chief
Environmental Health Services
LFPrpeh
500
-------
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA.
Department of Health
February 1, 1968
Mr. Lloyd ¥. Gebhard
Regional Program Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
TJ. S. Department of the Interior
918 Bnmet Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Dear Lloyd:
Thank you for an opportunity to review the booklet entitled "The
Cost of Clean Water".
The costs for sewage treatment are similar to estimates we recently
made for a ten year program. These estimates were $393 million. Recently
however, we have received comments from consulting engineers that bids are
coming in at ~L5% to 20$ above estimates. T do not know if this is a local
problem or if it is nationwide. In addition, the municipalities and
industries in the Delaware estuary area have indicated that costs for
achieving the water quality standards will be twice that estimated by
the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration's Delaware Estuary
Comprehensive Study.
Both of these sources indicate that for one reason or another, waste
treatment costs are increasing more rapidly than general construction
cost indices would indicate. With this in mind, it appears that both
of our estimates are optimistically low.
Another cost that should be included is the cost for tertiary treat-
ment of municipal wastes. We consider tertiary treatment as any treatment
that would normally provide more than 85$ BOD reduction and will remove
other constituents, such as phosphate, that cannot be removed by ordinary
secondary treatment of sewage. Cost estimates are difficult to make
because of a lack of cost data and because parallel water resources develop-
ment for low flow augmentation makes determination of needs difficult.
The costs, including the Delaware estuary, may exceed $200 million. Operation
costs are frequently several times the annual operating costs. The needs
fall into three principal categories; BOD reduction, nutrient reduction
and treatment of difficult industrial wastes, particularly colored wastes.
Nutrient reduction needs will increase most rapidly because of reservoir
construction.
501
-------
Mr. noyd W. Gebhard -2- February 7, 1968
A bried rundown of tertiary treatment areas and needs follow:
(Downstream to upstream)
A. Delaware River Basin
1. Delaware Estuary - BOD and nitrogenous compounds
'2. "White Clay Creek - Nutrients
3. Brandywine Creek - BOD
it. Ridley Creek - BOD
5. Darby Creek - BOD
6. SchuylkiU River - BOD in Reading area and from confluence
of Perkiomen Creek to mouth
a. Wissahickon Creek - BOD and nutrients
b. Valley Creek - BOD
c. Perkiomen Creek - BOD and nutrients
d. Manatawny Creek - Nutrients
e. Antietam Creek - BOD
f. Tulpehocken Greek - Nutrients above Blue Marsh Reservoir
(1) Spring Creek - BOD
g. Maiden Creek - Nutrients
7. Permypack Creek - BOD
8. Neshaminy Creek - BOD and nutrients
9. Tohickon Creek - BOD and nutrients
10. Lehigh River - BOD and nutrients. Nutrients principally to
protect the Delaware.
H. Martin's Creek - BOD and color
12. Delaware River above Tocks Island Dam - Nutrients
13. Lake WaHenpaupak Watershed - Nutrients
B. Susquehanna Basin
1. Conestoga Creek - BOD
2. Codorus Creek - BOD and color
3. West Conewago Creek - BOD
k» Swatara Creek - Nutrients above Swatara Gap Dam
a. Quittapahilla Creek - BOD
5>. Conodoquinet Creek - BOD and nutrients
6. Raystown Branch of the Juniata River - BOD and nutrients
7. Frankstown Branch of the Juniata River - BOD and color
8. Lackawanna River - BOD
9. Tunkhannock Creek - BOD
10. Sugar Creek - BOD
11. Tioga River - Possibly nutrients
12. Cowanesque River - BOD, color and nutrients
13. Spring Creek - BOD and nutrients
502
-------
Mr. Lloyd ¥. Gebhard -3- February 7, 1968
C. Potomac Basin
1. Piney Creek - BOD
2. Book Creek - BOD
3. Conocoeheague Creek - BOD
D. Lake Erie Basin
1. All - Nutrients, BOD on some tributaries
E. Monongahela Basin
1. Turtle Creek - BOD
2. Youghiogheny River
a. Sewickley Creek - BOD
b. Jacobs Creek - BOD
c. Casselman River
(l) Coxes Creek - BOD
3. Peters Creek - BOD
k. Redstone Creek - BOD
£. Tenmile Creek - BOD
F. Allegheny Basin
1. Pine Creek - BOD and Nutrients
2. Kiskiminetas - Conemaugh
a. Blacklick Creek - BOD
3. Bear Creek - BOD
it. Clarion River - BOD, color and nutrients
a. Elk Creek - BOD and nutrients
S>. French Creek - BOD
6. Brokenstraw Creek
a. Hare Creek - BOD
G. Ohio River - BOD
1. Beaver River
a. Connoquenessing Creek - BOD and nutrients
2. Chartiers Creek - BOD
503
-------
Mr. Iloyd W. Gebhard -k- February 7, 1968
This tabulation is not complete. It does, however, show that tertiary
treatment needs now exist or soon will exist throughout most of the state.
Nutrient control needs generally relate to discharges upstream from existing
lakes and reservoirs or proposed reservoirs.
A really concerted effort is needed to establish usable tertiary treat-
ment methods. We are trying to get this done on Neshaminy Creek at present
and will rapidly work throughout the state. One thing is clear, tertiary
treatment will be needed to meet water quality criteria in these areas unless
the criteria are reduced to less than desirable levels. ¥e do not choose
to use this alternative.
If there are any questions concerning this letter, please contact me.
Sincerely yours,
Walter A. Lyon, Director
Division of Sanitary Engineering
504
-------
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
State Board of Health
August 13, 1968
Mr. Eugene T. Jensen, Regional Program Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Department of the Interior, Middle Atlantic Region
918 Emmet Street
Charlottesville, Virginia 22901
Attention: Mr. Frank R. Blaisdell
Dear Sir:
I have your letter of August 7, 1968, to Mr. linton on cost estimates.
Sony the original request was buried under program reports, grant
requests, etc.
As to cost estimates, it seems to me that one man's estimate is apt to
be as far off as another's. My only point'of question would be the
S C section of Part 17, -where it appears that towns without sewers are
lumped with towns without adequate treatment. This seems to distort the
figures.
Would also point out that at least 20# of the population of the metro-
politan area of Charleston, Columbia and Greenville is served by privately
owned sewage collection and treatment systems.
By direction of W. T. Idnton, Executive Director, Pollution Control
Authority, and Director, Division of Sanitary Engineering.
Very truly yours,
George A. Rhame, Assistant Director
Pollution Control Authority
GARrae
505
-------
STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
State Department of Health
February 28, 1968
Garry L. Fisk, P.E.
Acting Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
601 East 12th Street
Kansas City, Missouri 61ilo6
Dear Mr. Fisk:
This is to acknowledge receipt of the report, "The Cost of Clean Water",
Volume 1, Summary Report, and copies of Volume 3.
Volume 1, "which is a summary of the major findings and conclusions of the more
detailed reports (Volumes 2,3, and 1;), has been reviewed and we have the fol-
lowing comments".
1. Table 2 has been checked and our estimates at this time would be:
Constructing
Total Total Upgrading Facilities Increases Allowances
(Current) (Constant) of For Untreated in Urban for
Dollars Dollars Facilities Wastes Population Depreciation
18.0 16.1 U.3 h.3 h.O 3-5
2. Table 3 has been checked and our estimates at this time would be:
Total Population Served by Facilities
Urban Pop. % of Pop. With Less
(Includes All Towns) Adequate Less Than Adequate None Than Adequate or None
ljQ9 289 86 3ii 29.3
3. Table £ has been checked and our estimates at this time would be:
Secondary Types of
Treatment
Primary Type of Activated Stabilization
Design Fop. Treatment Sludge Ponds
0-999 - - $ 68
1,000 - li,999 ..l4l
$,000 - 9,999 -
10,000 - 2lt,999 - -
2^,000 - 1^9,999
$0,000 - 99,999 - ti-
100,000 - and up - -
506
-------
Garry L. Fisk, P.E. Page 2 February 28, 1968
It is recommended that Tables 6,7,8 and 9 include data for Animal Feed
Lots. As noted on page 36 of the Report, this is a growing problem,
particularly in a State such as South Dakota.
We believe that our per capita costs as compared to those shown in
Table 5 are not out of line, due to lower labor and material costs in
this area. Our estimates are based upon contract letting data over the
period 1957-1967.
Very truly yours,
Charles E. Carl, Director
Division of Sanitary Engineering
CECtjb
507
-------
STATE OF UTAH
Utah State Division of Health
February 15, 1968
Mr. William B. Schreeder, Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
100 McAllister Street
San Francisco, California 9l|102
Dear Mr. Schreeder:
We have reviewed the report entitled "The Cost of Clean Water"
Volume I, which you submitted to us for this purpose.
From our review and with specific reference to Tables 2 and 3
(on pages 11 and 12 respectively) it is noted that a considerable
difference exists between the information reported for Utah and our
current file information. Some of this difference is undoubtedly the
result of your agency having used 1962 inventory data, but the Table
information is identified as current. We request, therefore, that
the information in Table 3 for Utah be changed to read as follows:
Total Urban Population (Sewered) - 857,000
Population Served by Adequate Treat- - 783,000
ment Facilities
Population Servey by Less Than - 56,000
Adequate Treatment Facilities
Population Served by No Treatment
Facilities (None) - 18,000
Percent of Population with less than
Adequate or no Treatment Facilities - 8.6$
It is further requested that the information on Table 2 for
Utah be changed to read as follows:
Total (Current Dollars) $20.0 Million
Total (Constant Dollars) 18.5 Million
Upgrading of Facilities 3.0 Million
Constructing Facilities for Untreated
Wastes il.O Million
508
-------
-2-
Increases in Urban Population $8.0 Million
Allowances for Depreciation 3-f? Million
¥e appreciate the opportunity and invitation to review and
comment on this report at this time.
Sincerely yours,
UTAH WATER POLLUTION COMMITTEE
Lynn M. Thatcher
Executive Secretary
CKS:cw
509
-------
STATE OF VERMONT
April 5, 1968
Mr. Lester M. Klashman
Regional Director
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
U. S. Department of the Interior
John Fitzgerald Kennedy Building
Boston, Massachusetts
Re: "Cost of Clean Water"
Volume I - Summary Report
Dear Mr. Klashman:
This office has reviewed the subject report provided by you
with your letter of February 2, 1962. Needless to say, this Department
takes gross exception to the reflection this report has of the status
of pollution control in the State of Vermont, of the costs to be incurred
between now and 1971 and in the per capita cost of waste treatment
facilities.
We have taken detailed information from our files and developed
parallel information to that contained on Tables 2, 3 and 5 of the
"Cost of Clean Water," Volume I. Such information is attached as
Enclosure A.
It is my feeling that such documents as the "Cost of Clean Water"
could better serve their purpose if the most accurate figures available
at federal, state and local levels were used in their development. This
office is most willing to assist in this regard.
Sincerely,
Commissioner
RAL/bg
510
-------
STATE OF WYOMING
Department of Public Health
February 5, 1968
Mr. Garry L. Fisk
Acting Regional Director
Federal Water Pollution Control
Adminiatration
601 East 12th Street
Kansas City, Missouri 6i|106
Dear Garry:
This will acknowledge receipt of the report "The Cost of
Glean Water" and your request for comments on this report.
My first reaction to the reported figures is that they are
quite high for the State of Wyoming. The total need (Constant Dollars)
for the State of Wyoming for the period 1969 - 1973 is given as 9 million
dollars. Referring to the project register, since 1956 we have constructed
55 projects which represents approximately two-thirds of the municipal
installations in the State. These 55 projects represented a total cost
of 7.33 million dollars. From these figures, it can be observed that the
9 million dollar need would very nearly replace all existing installations
in the State. It certainly is not indicated that this large an expendi-
ture is needed. In my opinion, the most questionable figure is the need
for "increases in Urban Population" shown as ii.5 million dollars. The
State of Wyoming has lost 170,000 population since I960. Unless some
major industrial complexes develop, there is nothing to indicate a change
in this population trend.
The figures in Table 3 compare favorably with the populations
served by the upgrading projects now underway. In most cases these are
replacement of facilities approaching obsolescence. Even with existing
facilities it is impossible to detect actual degradation of water quality
in most cases.
Very truly yours,
Arthur E. Williamson
Director
Division of Sanitary Engineering
AEW/cw
511
-------
COWENTS FROM INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS
ON THE COST OF CLEAN WATER
513
-------
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20242
April 26, 1968
Dear
The purpose of this letter is to transmit to you for your reaction
and comments a series of reports on the national costs of controlling
water pollution. These reports have been prepared by and for the
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration and transmitted to
the Congress in response to amendments to the Federal Water Pollution
Control Act which were incorporated in the basic legislation by the
Clean Water Restoration Act of 1966. This letter is being sent to
the 15 organizations on the enclosed list. The reports are being
sent to you under separate cover.
One four-volume set of these reports, entitled The Cost of Clean Water,
is being sent. Volume I is the summary report. Volume II contains
a more detailed analysis of municipal, industrial, and other costs
associated with waste and drainage controls. Volume III comprises ten
"industrial waste profiles," consisting of special studies on waste
treatment sources and treatment costs for several categories of manu-
facturing. These ten special studies were prepared by experts in the
field of industrial waste treatment. Volume IV shows estimated
municipal costs for States and major river basins. We feel that the
four volumes which make up The Cost of Clean Water report present the
most thorough and comprehensive study of waste treatment costs for
water pollution control yet prepared.
This study must be updated annually to be most useful, and the Act
requires that we do so. In this process we are seeking to improve
our cost estimates, particularly in regard to the industrial aspects.
It is most desirable that we develop a more complete picture encompass-
ing such important variables as the distribution of costs among cate-
gories of processing industries according to size and age of plant,
variations in manufacturing processes and differences associated with
geographic area and urban-metropolitan or rural setting. It is
apparent that these factors may well have a significant effect on the
choices for water pollution control and their associated costs. We are
also extremely interested in the experience of manufacturers who obtain
waste treatment service from municipalities or other local governments.
514
-------
In addition, we are forwarding copies of three other studies which
have just been completed and sent to the Congress. One report is a
study of the projected five-year cost of carrying out the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act, as amended. The other two studies, both
of which were prepared under contract, include an analysis of economic
incentives for industry and a study of the economic impact of the costs
of sewage treatment plant construction on State and local governments.
Although we do not subscribe entirely to the comments and findings of
the last two studies, we feel they provide thoughtful examination and
commentary on the subjects.
We would very much appreciate your comments on any or all of these
reports, especially as they relate to the industrial area. We are
particularly interested in receiving your comments on the four-volume
The Cost of Clean Water and the economic impact study because these
reports are required to be updated and sent to the Congress each year
and your participation in providing information will be extremely
useful to us in increasing the accuracy of these reports. Accordingly,
your suggestions and help in developing data and information for our
use in updating these studies will be most welcome.
Sincerely yours,
Joe G. Moore, Jr.
Commissioner
515
J38-B78 O - 69 - 34
-------
UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
WASHINGTON. D.C- 20242
September 3, 1968
Dear
This is in further reference to my letter of April 26, 1968, in
which I transmitted for your review and comment copies of several
studies of water pollution control costs which had been transmitted
to Congress earlier this year.
As I indicated in my letter, several of the studies are required by
our legislation to be updated annually. I indicated also that in
updating The Cost of Clean Water, the study of national requirements
and costs of controlling water pollution from municipal, industrial,
and other sources, we were particularly interested in obtaining your
comments on our estimates of industrial pollution control costs. We
recognize our first estimates are, at best, gross approximations of
needed expenditures and we also recognize the need for refining these
estimates both on the basis of further in-house studies and inventories
and on the experiences of the industries involved. Accordingly, the
purpose of this letter is to request that you indicate whether we may
expect a response from your organization on the cost estimates report
which would provide an input to our report to the Congress next January.
We will need your comments by September 30 in order to accommodate
them in the January 1969 report. If you do not expect to provide a
detailed response by September 30 but anticipate responding at a later
date, we would appreciate being so informed.
As I have indicated on many occasions, the wholehearted cooperation
of industry and government is one of the essential components of a
successful water pollution control program. It is in keeping with this
fundamental concept, therefore, that we request your cooperation in
developing for Congress realistic estimates of financial requirements
for controlling water pollution from industrial sources.
Sincerely yours,
Joe G. Moore, Jr.
Commissioner
516
-------
AMERICAN TEXTILE MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTE, INC.
CHARLOTTE ^_ ^_ I5QI JDH NSTDN BUILDING, CHARLOTTE, N. C. 28303
WASHINGTON BESSES TELEPHONEC704) 334-4734
NEW YORK
IV m
May 13, 1968
Mr. Joe G. Moore, Jr., Commissioner
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
United States Department of the Interior
Washington, B.C. 202U2
Dear Mr. Moore:
The reports you sent recently entitled "The Cost of Clean Water" are
quite interesting and seem to be well done. I regret that I have not yet
had time to study these as thoroughly as I would like, but I hope to get
around to this very shortly.
We are quite interested in stream pollution abatement and more specif-
ically industrial waste treatment. In fact, this organization appointed
a special committee to study this matter, and the work that has been done
so far has proved quite interesting although it is far from complete. This
special committee sent out a questionnaire to a great number of textile
operations several months ago, and as a result of this we have learned
that the cost of treating waste released from textile finishing plants ranges
from $1.00 to $218.00 per million gallons, with an average of $^7.i|6 per
million gallons. The $1.00 figure might well be a flat rate paid by that
particular finishing plant, but several others reported costs of no more
than $2.00 or $3.00 per million gallons.
A considerable number of mills receiving our questionnaire felt that we
were only interested in waste treated and then released into a river or
stream, and these companies did not report the cost of discharging their
waste into a municipal system. Therefore, we do not have as much infor-
mation in this direction as we would like to have, but we do hope to have
more facts on this a little later on.
517
-------
I hope to be able to give ray attention to a more complete study of "The
Cost of Clean Water" very shortly now, and afterward I will send you any
additional thoughts I have. We certainly do appreciate your including us
in the distribution of these reports.
Sincerely yours,
James S. Parker
JSPcdsp
518
-------
AMERICAN TEXTILE MANUFACTURERS INSTITUTE,
INC.
CHARLOTTE
^_ ^_ 1501 JOHNSTON BUILDING, CHARLOTTE N C ZBZOZ
WASHINGTON ^~ ^~
^^^^_ TELEPHONE(704) 334-4734
NEW YORK ^——
September 11, 1968
Mr. Joe G. Moore, Jr., Commissioner
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
United States Department of the Interior
Washington, D.C. 202U2
Dear Mr. Moore :
Thank you for your letter of September 3 and for giving more details of
your department's work in updating "The Cost of Clean Water." Since
our correspondence earlier this year, I have been able to give further
study to the books you sent on this subject, and I have found the written
explanation and details well done.
As I indicated to you in my letter of May 13, we sent a questionnaire to
a great number of textile operations during the early part of this year,
but we found that quite a few of these felt that we were only interested
in waste treatment and not in the details of discharging into a municipal
system. We decided to send the questionnaire to this particular segment
of the industry a second time and emphasize the importance of reporting
the information we requested, regardless of what happens to their waste.
This brought better results, and we are still receiving some of the
returned questionnaires almost every day. This delay has meant that we
have not been able to conclude this study nearly as soon as we thought
we would, and I regret to report that we do not yet have the conclusions
that we would like to report to you.
Therefore, I am going to follow the suggestion in the third paragraph
of your letter and say that we will have to make our detailed response
at some date after September 30. I am sorry that the situation had
developed in this manner, but I do not believe whatever we could give
at this time would be of any real value.
519
-------
We want you to know that we appreciate the good work you are doing, and
it is our intention to cooperate with you in every way possible. I
expect that we will be able to conclude our study within the next month
or so. It may be that we will be able to write again and send you
some of our findings in time for your report to Congress after all.
Sincerely yours,
James S. Parker
JSPtdsp
520
-------
THE BfiSStt CONFERENCE BOARD
INCORPORATED
845 THIRD AVENUE, NEW YORK, N.Y. 10022
Telephone (212) 759-09OO
May 2h, 1968
Mr. Joe G. Moore, Jr., Commissioner
United States Department of the Interior
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
Washington, D.C. 202li2
Dear Mr. Moore:
Thank you for sending me the series of reports on national costs for
controlling water pollution. Information derived from industry sources
indicates that complete data on the cost of pollution abatement is
vital to the success of any such program. Indeed, The Conference Board
initiated a pioneering study on capital expenditures for pollution
abatement in order to help provide some of the information needed and
is currently updating this project. Hopefully, we shall also learn
more about expenditures on research and engineering for pollution
control which will provide another dimension to our knowledge on the
subject.
However, as you pointed out in your letter, there is a need for more
information about the cost to industry if meaningful control is to be
realized. Large, round figures represent an important first step, but
they give many businessmen a sense of frustration since they fail to
throw sufficient light on the costs individual companies must face.
These costs, as you observed, tend to vary according to geographic
location, age and size of plant, and nature of product. What is needed,
according to comments we have received from leading corporate executives,
is a study which would provide detailed cost information on a plant-by-
plant, industry-by-industry basis. Public policy regarding incentives,
penalties, or other methods calculated to expedite solutions to the
pollution problem cannot be readily or fairly designed in the absence
of such information.
If you feel that The Conference Board can be helpful to you as you
pursue your worthy objectives, please feel free to let us know.
Cordially,
Thomas J. Diviney
Vice President
TJDtge
-------
American Association of
Textile Chemists and Colorists
September 18, 1968
Hon. Joe G. Moore, Jr., Commissioner
Federal Water Pollution Control Adm.
United States Department of the Interior
Washington, D.C. 202i|2
Dear Mr. Moore:
We plan to discuss "The Cost of Clean Water" as it refers to the
textile industry with our Stream Sanitation Committee RA58 at the
November meeting. This will be the first chance we will have to get
a good response from our membership.
We have written them and requested comments but do not feel that
they all have seen the study. We therefore will have to respond
to your inquiry after September, 1968.
Sincerely yours,
T.A. Alspaugh, Chairman RA 58
Stream Sanitation Committee
522
-------
American Association of
Textile Chemists and Colorists
December 20, 1968
Hon. Joe G. Moore, Jr., Commissioner
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U.S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D.C. 202l|2
Dear Mr. Moore:
We have delayed acknowledgment of your letter of September 3, 1968
requesting information on the cost estimates contained in The Cost
of Clean Water until we could discuss this thoroughly with appropriate
officials of our Association.
While we much appreciate the opportunity to comment on cost data,
we have not developed this type of information. If such data are
to be released by textile mills, we are of the opinion that the
information should be released by the mill group rather than through
a technical and scientific society such as AATCC.
With best wishes,
Sincerely yours,
George P. Paine
Executive Secretary
523
-------
THE SOAP AND DETERGENT ASSOCIATION
TECHNICAL AND MATERIALS DIVISION
485 MADISON AVENUE NEW YORK.. N. Y. 10022
TELEPHONE (212) 751-6080
September 12, 1968
Mr. Joe G. Moore, Jr., Commissioner
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U.S. Department of the Interior
Washington, B.C. 202U2
Dear Mr. Moore:
We would like to contribute to the background material you are collect-
ing for updating "The Cost of Clean Water'1.
Our Association is deeply involved, as you know, in the clean water
picture. However, our thrust and direction is aimed at the problems with
product residues and the disposal of products vended by the industry
when used by others. We do not, therefore, involve ourselves in the
waste aspects of the manufacturing processes and related plant waste
problem.
Our member companies involve themselves in the Manufacturing Chemists'
Association, the National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber
of Commerce, as well as a wide variety of specialized groups, depending
upon the manufacturing mix of the individual company. These include the
National Council for Stream Improvement as well as the American Petroleum
Institute and similar groups.
As you well know, we stand ready to cooperate in any way that we can do
so. The comment that our members are represented in the manufacturing
wastes area through other Associations is, we assure you, no attempt to
transfer the burden. If you feel that we can furnish any other informa-
tion which would be useful to you in updating "The Cost of Clean Water,"
we'd be pleased to hear further from you.
Cordially,
Charles G. Bueltman
Vice President and Technical Director
OGB/pg
524
-------
Tanners' Council
America, Inc.
A. MEYER. JR.
PRESIDENT
CHARLES T. MCCARTHY
TREASURER
IRVING R. GLASS
EXEC. VtCE-PRESlDENT
HERBERT F. MILLER
SECRETARY
FIFTH AVENUE • NEW YORK, N. Y. 1OO1O
(212) 686-7950
September 23, 1968
Mr. Joe G. Moore, Jr., Commissioner
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U.S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D.C. 202U2
Dear Mr. Moore:
I must apologize for our delay in sending you detailed comment on
the studies you had forwarded to me April 26, 1968. Our delay has been
caused only by our effort to assimilate your comprehensive studies and
to give you informed and reasoned comment.
We certainly want to cooperate with you to the fullest possible extent.
The correlated problems of industrial waste disposal and clean water
are extremely important to the tanning industry of the United States.
For several years research and engineering studies of these problems
have been a major aspect of the program of the Research Laboratory we
maintain at the University of Cincinnati.
In appraising the cost projections of your studies I have tried to
extrapolate our own industry experience. A number of tanneries in
various areas have in recent years either installed or modernized water
treatment and disposal systems. Based on the practical experience of
the industry I have found that our past thinking and engineering
appraisals have all been much too low. In effect, we have under-estimated
current costs of meeting modern objectives and standards.
We realize that the tanning industry is a comparatively small sector
of the gross industrial problem. However, if our experience is any
guide, potential capital outlays generally will be of a larger order
than either industry or public authorities have assumed. If we cannot
do so before September 30th we shall send you within the next month
detailed cost and capital estimates for our own industry. At this time
I can only suggest that the capital costs developed in your studies are
525
-------
Very probably on the low side. The data and information available to
us is, of course, minute in comparison with the extensive analysis of
your Administration. However, we have been consistently dismayed at
the practical magnitude of cost in every instance where realistic imple-
mentation of sound objectives has been sought.
I should like to compliment your Administration on the caliber of your
studies. These should certainly aid Congress in recognizing the scope
of the problem before the nation and in supporting a long range program
which can fuse national and industrial interests.
Sincerely yours,
Irving R. Glass
Executive Vice President
irg/mr
526
-------
GARTNERS ASSOCIATION
1133 - SOT? STHEET, NORTITW-EST
WASHINGTON, D. C.
OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE Vies PRESIDENT
September 26, 1Q68
Mr. Joe G. Moore, Jr.
Commissioner
U.S. Department of the Interior
Federal "Water Pollution Control Administration
Washington, B.C. 202U2
Dear Mr. Moore:
On September 9, 1968 I wrote you stating that cost estimates on
pollution control for the canning industry would be available by
September 30. It is a great disappointment that I must report
that the data has not been finalized and can not be submitted at
this time. As soon as this material is available, I will forward
it to your office immediately.
I again would like to thank you for the many opportunities we
have had to work with your organization.
Sincerely,
Milan D. Smith
Executive Vice President
MDS/mal
527
-------
WASHINGTON
MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE.N.W.
NEW YORK
366 MADISON AVENGE
AUTOMOBILE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION,
32O NEW CENTER BUILDING - DETROIT, MICHIGAN 482O2 • TRINITY 2-4311 AREA 313
ARJAY MILLER,CHAIRMAN
THOMAS C. MANN. PRESIDENT
RUSSELL E.MACCLEERY.ADMINISTRATIVE VICE PRESIDENT
September 17, 1968
Mr. Joe G. Moore, Jr.
Commissioner
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
U.S. Department of the Interior
Washington, B.C. 202h2
Dear Mr. Moore:
I am replying to your letter of September 3 on behalf of Mr. James D.
Johnston, to idiom it was addressed. This correspondence makes reference
to your letter of April 26 which submitted several studies of water
pollution control costs and asked for industry comment on your estimates
of industrial pollution control costs.
The volume of material submitted has made it impossible to complete
a review of it, partly because we are in the process of some reorgani-
zation of our own staff and committee structure which would be
involved in a consideration of this type of subject.
We are not prepared to offer any comment before September 30 but
if we can do so within a reasonable period after that date we will
forward the comment to you.
Sincerely,
William F. Sherman
Group Manager - Technical
WFSrds
528
-------
ERNEST KIRKENDALL.
VICE PRESIDENT
10017
September 27, 1968
Mr. Joe G. Moore, Jr., Commissioner
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
United States Department of the Interior
Washington, D.C. 202U2
Dear Mr. Moore:
In your letter of April 26, 1968, to Mr. John P. Roche, you asked
for comments on several reports, including "The Cost of Glean Water,"
Volume III, Industrial Waste Profile No. 1, BlastTurnaces"'and'Steel
Mills.
In general we believe that this report is excellent in presenting
water pollution abatement in the steel industry. Steel mills were
constructed over a period of many years with each addition to the
mill being tailored to fit the geography and specific product require-
ments. Therefore, there is no typical set of conditions that can
represent the entire industry. Of necessity, the author has used
judgment in arriving at overall figures for water usage and treatment
practices.
It is, therefore, not possible to subscribe entirely to the informa-
tion in the report since a somewhat different judgment factor might
be applied by each reviewer.
When one forecasts future pollution loads, one is faced with an even
more complex problem. With the efforts being made by the steel
industry to control water pollution and the efforts being made by
your department and various state regulatory agencies in assuring
a viable water pollution abatement program, many of us believe that
future years will show less pollutants coming from our steel plants
even with increased production of steel. Once again, this is a
matter of judgment. We can only hope that our optimistic view of
the future turns out to be more accurate than the rather pessimistic
view in the report.
If you would care to discuss sections of the report in some detail,
a group from the American Iron and Steel Institute would be happy
to meet with your personnel.
Yours very truly,
Ernest Kirkendall
529
-------
national council
OF THE PAPER INDUSTRY
FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT, INC.
September 27, 1968
Mr. Joe G. Moore, Jr., Commissioner
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
United States Department of the Interior
Washington, B.C. 2021*2
Dear Mr. Moore:
In reply to your letter of September 3rd, 1968, the National Council
will not be in a position to comment by September 30th on your study
'"Die Cost of Clean Water". Your letter of April 26th was referred
to a Committee for action. IMs group which just met recently has
instructed the staff members from the National Council and the
American Paper Institute to arrange a meeting with the Federal Water
Pollution Control Administration to determine how the information
available to the industry can be put to use in up-dating the
subject study.
Dr. Isaiah GelTjnan, Asst. Technical Director of the National Council
will be contacting your office shortly for an appointment.
While we will not be able to submit comments in time for the 1969 Report,
I am sure that whatever information is developed as a result of the
above meeting will be of use in the 1970 Report.
Yours very truly,
Ernest J. Bolduc, Jr.
Executive Secretary
3J3:dlr
530
-------
TELEPHONE HUDSON 3-6126
Manufacturing Chemists' Association, Inc.
GEORGE H. DECKER
General, U.S.A. (Ret.)
PRESIDENT
(FOUNDED 1872)
1825 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20009
September 26, 1968
Mr. Joe G. Moore, Jr., Commissioner
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
United States Department of the Interior
Washington, B.C. 202h2
Dear Commissioner Moore:
Since receiving your letter of August 29, I have had my staff again
contact our Water Resources Committee regarding a review of The Cost
of Clean Water, in particular the profile report on water pollution
control in plastics materials manufacturing which was the only branch
of the chemical industry covered specifically in the initial study.
This review is currently in progress, but it does not appear feasible
to complete it by September 30. I would be pleased if you would give
this matter any further emphasis and guidance you feel appropriate
when you meet with the Committee on October 9, and we will do our
best to get detailed comments to you within a week or two thereafter.
In respect to your currently continuing studies bearing on the chemical
industry, Mr. Edwin Johnson of your staff has already been in touch
with several of our Committee members concerning a similar report on
organic chemicals manufacturing. My staff representative to this
Committee, Mr, Harry E. Bobbins, has already given assurance that he
will assist in coordinating the review of it. The opportunity to
work with your people on these reports prior to their publication
will be very much appreciated.
Now approaching completion is an MCA survey of its membership which
includes investment and operating expenditures for water pollution
control. There will be no specific data in reference to particular
product lines; however, plastics materials manufacture, which accounts
for a substantial percentage of the chemical industry, is included.
We hope the overall information will be both useful and impressive.
From the outset of this project, it has been our intention to share
this information with you as soon as it is ready for release.
531
339-678 0-69-35
-------
I share your strong interest In fostering cooperation between government
and industry, having spent most of ray life in Federal service before
coming to MCA several years ago. I will be pleased to do whatever I
can to facilitate our working together.
Sincerely,
G.H. Decker
532
-------
TELEPHONE HUDSON 3-6126
Manufacturing Chemists' Association, Inc.
GEORGE H. DECKER
General, U.S.A. (Ret.)
PRESIDENT
(FOUNDED 1872)
1825 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N. W.
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20009
November 11, 1968
Mr. Joe G. Moore, Jr., Commissioner
Federal Vlater Pollution Control Administration
United States Department of the Interior
Washington, B.C. 202^2
Dear Commissioner Moore:
Supplementing my letter of September 26, 1968, this is in further
reply to your invitation of August 29 to review The JJosj of Clean
Water report submitted to the Congress early this year.
The industry specialists who carried out our review confined their
attention to the profile study on plastics materials and resins,
inasmuch as that was the only part of the initial studies that
concerned chemical manufacturing. Their views are summarized in
the enclosed commentary.
The comments are intended as constructive guidance for refinement
of cost information as those cost studies continue in the future.
I am confident you desire frankness, and will accept them in that
light.
Thank you again for extending the opportunity for this review, and
also for the opportunity to have industry representatives consult
with your staff on the current year's study pertaining to organic
chemicals manufacture, now scheduled for next week.
Sincerely,
G.H. Decker
Enclosure
533
-------
Commentary by the Manufacturing Chemists Association
concerning Profile No. 10 on Plastics Materials and Resins
The Cost of Clean Water (1968)
1. As a general characterization, the waste treatment processes
on which cost estimates are based tend to be more acaetonic
than representative of current industrial practices.
2. For polyethylene and most of the higher polymer types, the
principal waste problem is removal of dispersed solids.
3. Estimated waste loads appear valid as to general order of
magnitude, but averages for old, middle-aged, and new plants
can be misleading if an attempt were made to apply these data
to any particular plant.
It. Reliance on short-term BOD (Biochemical Oxygen Demand) measure-
ments for such wastes is unreliable, since in many instances
there may be substantial ultimate oxygen demand as indicated
by COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand) with relatively little BOD.
Accordingly, wastewater renovation cost estimates as reported
are probably low, perhaps in some cases only about half what
actual costs would be.
5. In reference to melamine resin wastes, properly operated
incineration should not lead to air pollution problems.
6. Respecting phenolic resin wastes, use of a holding tank or other
means to accomplish more uniform rate is a part of good pre-treatment
practice.
534
-------
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
11O1 SEVENTEENTH STREET, NORTHWEST
WASHINGTON. D. C. 2OO36
P. N. GAMMELGARD, VICE PRESIDENT TELEPHONE
ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DeCelllber 10 , 1968 2O2-296-O3OO
Mr. Joe G, Moore, Jr., Commissioner
Federal Water Pollution Control Adm.
U.S. Department of the Interior
Washington, D.C. 202U2
Dear Mr. Moore:
The American Petroleum Institute appreciates the opportunity to
comment on behalf of the oil industry on your department's reports,
"The Cost of Clean Water."
As you know, a meeting was held on November Uth in Washington with
Messrs. E.L. Johnson, A. Hirsch, and F. Stein, representing FWPCA,
and Messrs. W.A. Burhouse, H.F. Elkin, J.S. Baum, R.N. Simonson,
and the writer, representing API. The purpose of the November Uth
meeting was twofold:
(l) To discuss comments received from various members of the oil
industry committees who have reviewed "The Cost of Clean Water"
reports and Volume HI, Profile 5, "Petroleum Refining," in particular,
and
(2) To informally present the results of the API Refinery Effluent
Profile survey to members of your staff.
The frank exchange of views between FWPCA and API representatives
was most productive and mutually informative. The results of the
"196? Domestic Refinery Evaluation Profile" survey conducted by API
were of interest to members of your staff and should provide useful
guidance in any future activities designed to gain further understand-
ing of industrial pollution control operations.
Copies were given to your staff during the meeting on November Uth, and
the thought was expressed that after adequate time had been given to
review the report in detail that another meeting be held. A copy of
the report is attached for your reference.
535
-------
Overall, comments received from API member companies commended the
breadth and scope of this initial effort by FWPCA to qualitatively and
quantitatively evaluate major industrial waste categories and to estimate
anticipated costs for continued abatement efforts. Various questions
were raised, however, concerning the approaches selected and the study
methodology employed. For example, the API Refinery Effluent Profile
survey may suggest alternative evaluation routes to your staff other than
the approach employed in your initial effort. The oil industry comments
on your department1 s reports, disucussed at the November Ijth meeting
with your staff, are summarized in Appendix A.
We are also attaching a copy of a recently completed Report on Air and
Water Conservation Expenditures of the Petroleum Industry, which includes
an up-to-date summary of oil industry costs for control of refinery
effluents.
We look forward to future contacts and meetings with members of your
staff. A free exchange of ideas and open discussion of problems should
result in earlier attainment of the goal of clean water.
Sincerely,
P.N. Gammelgard
Vice President
Environmental Affairs
Attachments
536
-------
APPENDIX A
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS BY THE AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE
CONCERNING THE FWPCA PUBLICATION "THE COST OF CLEAN WATER" (1968)
Volume I - Summary Report
1. The total costs projected for anticipated "Industrial Treatment
Plants" (table 1, page 9) represent a useful initial overall estimate.
It is assumed that improved definition of industrial waste treatment
objectives and further detailed studies of industry groups not report-
ed in Volume III, Profiles 1-10 will permit more comprehensive estimates
of total industrial requirements.
2. The derivation of the industrial waste data reported for
"Petroleum and Coal" in table 6, page 21, is unclear. What proportion
of the reported wastewater volume, biochemical oxygen demand and
settleable and suspended solids are represented by refinery effluents?
Since Volume III, Profile 5 is confined to petroleum refining, it would
be helpful to list the petroleum industry separately.
3. Although not entirely in agreement, the BOD data reported in
the API Refinery Effluent Profile - 196? is in the same order of
magnitude as the value reported in the FWPCA Volume I, table 6. The
overall values reported for settleable and suspended solids in table
6 appears high. Are these solids data corrected for plant intake
water solids loadings?
Volume HI - Industrial Waste Profile No. 5? - Petroleum Refining
A. General Comments
1. In the case of petroleum refining, the classification of
"older", "typical" and "newer" technology may be an oversimplifica-
tion. Historical age of a refinery is only one of many factors which
may influence its waste load potential. Most "older" refineries
have been modernized, at least in part, but often in progressive unit
sequence. Because of this evolutionary stepwise updating of processing
facilities, no two "modernized" refineries are necessarily similar.
Moreover, water and waste handling systems may or may not be revamped
in a particular refinery modernization. This latter factor is an
important influencing variable in determining plant waste water loadings.
2. The concept of approximating overall plant waste loadings by
the sub-process material balance approach has questionable validity
as indicated by the unsatisfactory total estimates reported in Profile
No. $. The variability of individual unit process waste loads and
537
-------
the contribution of non-process waste sources impair the reliability
of this approach.
3. It is suggested that the concept of overall refinery processing
complexity, as utilized in the API Refinery Effluent Profile Survey
(topping, and cracking, integrated, etc.), coupled with the factors
of refinery size and age may permit a more meaningful assessment of
waste loadings.
li. 14ich of the waste water data presented in the text and in
certain tables (E.I. tables 6 and 8) is unclear as to the extent of
treatment represented. Treatment beyond gravity separation, includ-
ing intermediate and biological, should be more clearly identified.
Similarly, frequent references to discharge of specific waste water
streams "to the sewer" are somewhat misleading. What is intended is
that wastes are discharged to treatment facilities.
5. The text consistently refers to lack of effort to determine
waste flows and characteristics for specific processes and operating
units (pages 17, 30, etc.). Actually many refiners have attempted
to perform material balance in-plant surveys with only mixed success.
B. Specific Comments
1. Page S-l - In paragraph 1, introduction, the total 1963
petroleum refining annual payroll for 120,000 employees was not
"$16 billion".
2. Page S-13 - The projection of increasing overall refinery
waste loadings is questioned since waste loads are believed to be
decreasing with new refinery construction and modernization of older
facilities.
3. Page S-lU - In the third paragraph, the term "tertiary" is
generally regarded as a stage of treatment rather than a particular
type of waste treatment. In the fourth paragraph, under physical
methods, stripping, filtration and centrifuging could also be included.
In paragraph five, chemical methods could also include neutralization
and air or chemical oxidation.
U. Page 10 - Finned-tube coolers, through which spent cooling
water is passed, is mentioned as a means of reducing cooling water
usage. Finned-tubular equipment is used more frequently for cooling
hydrocarbon streams.
538
-------
5. Page 20 - The discussion on oxygen demand suggests that a
severe oxygen demand results from leaks of soluble hydrocarbons and
sulfides. Actually, the solubility of most hydrocarbons is relative-
ly low and sulfides are usually stripped from low-volume highly
concentrated streams before discharge to the sewer system and terminal
treatment facilities.
6. Page 30 - Paragraph two suggests that hydrocracking generates
substantially lower pollution loadings than the processes it replaced.
The reduced levels of sulfides and nitrogen compounds in the product
streams could indicate rejection of higher levels of these waste
components in the gaseous and waste streams before subsequent waste
reduction or treatment.
7, Page 33 - Although trickling filters have been successfully
used to treat refinery waste waters including phenolic compounds,
it is questionable if they have been used extensively as suggested
in the third paragraph.
8. Page U7 - Cooling and condensing waters are often segregated
from process waste waters, contrary to the discussion in the second
paragraph.
s
9. Page hi - The converse of conveyance of municipal wastes to
industrial treatment plants, as mentioned in paragraph three, is
receiving equal attention. That is, the discharge of industrial
wastes to municipal treatment facilities.
10. Table 6 - The concept of a "representative" 100,000 B/D
refinery requires more definition as to complexity of processing,
etc.
11. Table 13 - Similarly, the categorization of "small",
"medium" and "large" refineries should be further classified by
extent of processing employed.
12. Tables 15>-l8 - The attempts at generalized cost estimating
and allocation are potentially useful but the high percentage of
"unaccounted" costs in table 17 raise serious questions as to the
validity of this sub-process cost analysis approach.
539
-------
AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE
59 EAST VAN BUREN STREET • CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60605 • WAbash 2-4686
September 2h, 1^
Mr. Joe G. Moore, Jr., Commissioner
Federal Water Pollution Control Administration
United States Department of the Interior
Washington, B.C. 202U2
Dear Mr. Moore:
This letter is in answer to 7our letter of September 3rd which arrived
just prior to our Annual Convention and to your earlier letter asking
for the views of the American Meat Institutue with respect to the
four-volume report The Cost of Clean Tfeter. An answer had been
prepared responding to your earlier letter but apparently was mislaid
and not sent. We are sorry for the delay.
We have reviewed volumes I, II and IV and have closely examined
Industrial Waste Profile No. 8 covering the meat industry. We plan,
therefore, to confine our comments to the meat industry report.
On the whole, the report appears to be reasonably well done considering
the short time allowed to put it together. Apparently the authors1
experience was mostly in the cattle slaughtering area, hence, significant
wastewater sources which relate to hog slaughtering operations are
not mentioned.
We are concerned by the failure to separate out the wasteloads generated
by meat processing and manufacturing operations in multi-purpose plants
while including the total wasteload from these plants expressed as
gallons and pounds of BOD per 1000 pounds live weight killed along with
wasteloads from strictly slaughtering plants.
The statement "Process water is not recirculated in the Meat Packing
Industry," page S-5, is not accurate. For instance, this ignores
extensive water reuse in inedible rendering cooker condensers and hog
dehairing machines.
The Cost of Waste Treatment Facilities data (Table 27) appears to us
to be unrealistic and presents misleading capital cost figures. For
example, we know that a medium-sized plant channel-aeration treatment
540
-------
works could not be constructed for a figure nearly as low as $1^,000.
One hundred thousand dollars would be more reasonable. Further, the
operating costs shown are open to question.
We believe the meat industry will find this report to be a useful
addition to the survey literature previously made available through
the efforts of the National Technical Task Committee on Industrial Wastes.
As you may be aware, representatives of the meat industry devoted much
time and effort in the preparation of the Meat Industry jtfaste Guides and
the Water in Industry report of 1965. It is only because we have these
reports that we are able to give a meaningful review of The Cosj/ ojT Clean
Water.
Our experience in conducting the meat industry portion of the Water in
Industry report has made us aware of the extreme difficulties to be
encountered in producing an authentic picture of this widely decentralized
and complex industry.
We, and other former members of the National Technical Task Committee,
recognize that abatement can only be accomplished at the local level,
taking into account conditions found in the receiving streams and water-
sheds, the industries present and the municipal facilities available.
This being the case, we have urged government agencies proposing studies
that they be conducted so as to point toward solution of the individual
watershed problems that in total make up our national problem.
Recognizing the mutual interests of the Water Pollution Control Administra-
tion and the American Meat Institute in finding answers to the many
faceted waste problem, we thought you might want to know of our recent
participation on the State Agricultural Experiment Station - USDA Task
Force on the Quality of the Environment. We understand that this report
detailing research needs to reduce pollution caused by, or affecting,
agriculture and forestry and their related industries will be forthcoming
shortly.
Donald MacKenzie, Director of our Department of Plant Operations, is
responsible in our organization for handling this subject and you may
wish to direct future communications on this subject to his attention.
Very truly yours,
AMERICAN MEAT INSTITUTE
Roy Stone
Vice President-Assistant Treasurer
RSrmp
541
U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1969 O - 339-678
------- |