27754
                 DRAFT CRITERIA DOCUMENT
                    FOR' VINYL CHLORIDE
                      FEBRUARY  1984
                  HEALTH EFFECTS  BRANCH
             CRITERIA AND STANDARDS  DIVISION
                 OFFICE OF DRINKING  WATER
           U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
                 WASHINGTON, D.C.  20460

-------
                     TABLE OF CONTENTS
"I.          SUMMARY                                   1-1



 II.         INTRODUCTION                             II-l



 III.        PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES        III-l



 IV.         PHARMACOKINETICS                         IV-1



            A.   Absorption                          IV-1



            B.   Metabolism                          IV-5



            C.   Excretion                           IV-8



 V.          HUMAN EXPOSURE*                           V-l



 VI.         HEALTH EFFECTS  IN  ANIMALS                VI-1




            A.   Acute/Chronic Effects               VI-1



            B.   Teratogenicity                     VI-3



            C.   Mutagenicity                        VI-4



            D.   Carcinogenicity                     VI-6



 VII.        HUMAN HEALTH EFFECTS                    VII-1



            A.   Non-Carcinogenic effects           VII-1



            B.   Carcinogenic  effects               VII-6




 VIII.       MECHANISM OF TOXICITY                 VIII-1



 IX.         RISK ASSESSMENT                          IX-1



 X.          QUANTIFICATION OF  TOXICOLOGICAL EFFECTS  X-l




 XI.         REFERENCES                               XI-1






 *Prepared by the Science and Technology Branch

-------
 I.   SUMMARY



      Almost 7  billion pounds  of  vinyl  chloride  are produced"


 in  the United  States  annually.   Most emissions  into the environ-


 ment originate from manufacturing plants which  use the compound


 for the production  of polyvinyl  chloride resins.  The predomi-


 nant route of  exposure to  the public living near these plants


 is  through inhalation,  while  the principal source of vinyl


 chloride exposure for most Americans is probably from polyvinyl


 chloride food  containers.  This  source contributes approximately


 1 ppb to the diet.  Vinyl  chloride has also been found in


 drinking water.  Three national  surveys of drinking water have


 demonstrated the presence  of  vinyl chloride at  very low levels


 (ug/1  range) in a small number of supplies.

                                 •



     Upon ingestion,  vinyl chloride is rapidly  absorbed from


 the  gastrointestinal  tract and is distributed to the liver and


 other  organs.  Several pathways  may be involved in vinyl chloride


 metabolism, which occurs primarily in  the liver.  The toxicity


 of vinyl  chloride appears  to  be  attributable to its enzymatic


 conversion to reactive polar  metabolites such as chloroacetalde-


hyde or  chloroethylene oxide.  Several of these suspected  meta-


bolites are mutagenic, while  vinyl chloride itself is not, accord-
                                    f

ing to available information.  At low  doses (e.g., 1 mg/kg) the


metabolites of vinyl  choride  are primarily excreted in the urine.

-------
                            1-2
At high doses (e.g., 100 mg/kg), most of the solvent is



expired as vinyl chloride.





     Acute and chronic exposure to vinyl chloride can result



in toxicity in experimental animals and humans.  In animals,



an inhalation exposure of approximately 100,000 ppm results



in death within several hours, with autopsies revealing



congestion and edema of the lungs and hyperemia of the



Kidneys and liver.  ?est animals exposed to an inspired



air concentration below 100 ppm exhibit no pronounced adverse



health effects.  Vinyl chloride does not appear to be terato-



genic in rats or rabbits, and insufficient data exists to



evaluate the teratogenicity of vinyl chloride in humans.





     Studies on humans working in vinyl chloride plants sug-



gest that systemic toxic effects that are noncarcinogenic



in nature can be demonstrated at exposure levels below 50



ppm.  Some plant workers may have been exposed to concentra-



tions exceeding 1000 ppm and occasionally approaching 10,000



ppm before OSHA standards were instituted in 1974.  At these



levels, workers manifested dizziness, headaches, and/or



euphoria.  Long-term exposure to these levels in vinyl chlor-



ide plants have resulted in a number of diseases (i.e.,



acroosteolysis, pulmonary insufficiency), cardiovascular



and gastrointestinal manifestations, and disturbances of



the central nervous system.  Unfortunately, data regarding

-------
                            1-3




dose-response relationships in humans are very scarce because


of the virtual absence of air measurements of vinyl chloride


in the work environment before 1974.




     Vinyl chloride is a proven carcinogen in mice, hamsters,


and rats.  Animal studies have shown that vinyl chloride pro-


duces tumors of different types at different sites, and that


the incidence and relative distribution are influenced by

                              \
dose, age of the animal, and species and strain of animal used.


Angiosarcomas of the liver were found in all animals studied,


whereas some types of tumors such as brain tumors, hepatomas


and lung tumors were observed in one type of animal only.  A


dose-response relationship was observed in most experiments.


Inhalation studies have shown the lowest dose of vinyl chloride


exposures to have a carcinogenic effect to be 50 ppm.  A  recent-


ly completed ingestion study demonstrated the occurrence of hepat-


ic angiosarcomas and pulmonary angiosarcomas in rats at levels


of 5.0 mg/kg bw/day or more, and the increased incidence of
         • • .

foci of cellular alteration and liver cell tumors at the lowest


exposure level of 1.7 mg/kg/ bw/day.




     Human data have been primarily obtained from workers


exposed to vinyl chloride.  A number of epidemiologic studies


have linked vinyl chloride with angiosarcoma and other forms


of neoplasm.  The reported frequency of angiosarcoma of the


liver is especially noteworthy because this is a very rare

-------
                              1-4
type of cancer  (25 -  30 cases/year  in  the United States),
and it is reasonable  to infer a causal relationship between
exposure to vinyl chloride and the  development of this tumor.
Through 1977, a total of 64 cases of liver angiosarcoma have
been identified worldwide among vinyl chloride-exposed indus-
trial workers.  Although rare, the  carcinogenicity of vinyl
chloride to humans is unambiguous.

     The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)
analyzed the available data and concluded that exposure to
vinyl chloride results in an increased carcinogenic risk to
humans.  The organs most likely to  be affected were the
liver, brain, lung and hemato-and lymphopoietic systems.
The National Academy of Sciences (1983) also examined the
data and concluded that vinyl chloride is an established
carcinogen in humans and animals with older animals and
females appearing to be more susceptible.

     The National Academy of Science (NAS) and EPA's Carcin-
ogen Assessment Group (CAG)  have calculated projected incre-
mental excess cancer risks associated with the consumption
of a specific 'chemical via drinking water by mathematical,
extrapolation from high-dose animal studies.  Using the risk
estimates generated by the NAS (1977-1979) where the linear
non-threshold multi-stage model was utilized, the range of
vinyl chloride concentrations were  computed that would nomi-

-------
                             1-5



nally increase the risk of one excess cancer per million


(106), per hundred thousand (105). or per ten thousand (104)


people over a 70-year lifetime assuming daily consumption at


the stated exposure level.  From the NAS model it is estimated


at the 95% confidence limit that consuming two liters per


day over a lifetime having a vinyl chloride concentration of


100 ug/1, 10 ug/1 or 1 ug/t would increase the risk of one


excess cancer per 10,000, 10.0,000 or 1,000,000 people exposed,
            ••

respectively.  Using the revised GAG approach and the multi-


stage model, it was estimated at the 95% confidence limit


that consuming two liters per day over a lifetime having a  .


vinyl chloride concentration of 200 ug/1, 20 ug/1 or 2 ug/1


would increase the risk of one excess cancer per 10,000,
                              •
                              *

100,000 or 1,000,000 people exposed respectively.  The


numerical differences observed after utilizing the NAS and


GAG risk estimates are due to the selection of data for use
                /

in the model.  The NAS based its calculations on an ingestion


study by Maitoni et al. (1975) in which rats were exposed to


vinyl chloride by gavage, while the GAG used the same Maitoni


et al. (1975) study but based its estimate upon the increased


incidence of total tumors in rats exposed to vinyl chloride


through inhalation.

-------
II. INTRODUCTION




    Vinyl chloride has been used foe over 40 years in the


production of poiyvinyl chloride (PVC)f the most widely used


material in the manufacture of plastics throughout the world.


About 25% of the estimated 18 billion pounds of vinyl chloride


produced worldwide in 1972 was manufactured in the United


States (Berk, et a_l., 1976). Between 1968 and 1973, vinyl
               •  "   »

chloride production in the United States rose 14% annually,


reaching a production level of nearly 7 billion pounds in
                                       •

1978 (U.S. Int. Trade Comm.).  This increase in vinyl chloride


production was due to the growing dependence of virtually


every branch of industry and commerce upon products and


components fabricated from poiyvinyl chloride (U.S. EPA, 1974).


(For the location of vinyl chloride and poiyvinyl chloride


manufacturing and processing plants in the United States in


1978, refer to Figure II-l.)




     Vinyl chloride is not known to occur in nature (National


Academy of Sciences, 1977).  The compound is synthesized as


chlorinated olefinic hydrocarbon monomer from petrochemical


feedstock and chlorine.  In 1975, vinyl chloride emissions


in the United States were found to originate from three major


sources:   (1) 17 plants where vinyl chloride was commercially


synthesized (about 11 percent);  (2) 41 PVC plants where the


vinyl chloride monomer was used in the production of PVC

-------
                                                  (Milby,  1978)
°Vinyl Chloride Plant Location
"Polyvinyl Chloride Plant Location

SOURCE:  SRI.
°PUERTO RICO

-------
                          II-2
resins for various industrial purposes (about. 85 percent);
(3) about 8,000 PVC fabricating plants (U.S. EPA, 1975b).

     Vinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride are used as raw
materials in the rubber, paper, glass and automotive indus-
tries.  In addition, vinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride
are used in the manufacture of electrical wire insulation
and cables, piping, industrial and household equipment,
medical supplies, food packaging materials and'building and
construction products.  Polyvinyl chloride and vinyl chloride
copolymers are distributed and processed in a variety of
forms, including dry resins, plastisol (dispersions in plasti-
cizers), organosol (dispersions in plasticizers plus volatile
solvent), and latex (a colloidal dispersion in water used to
coat paper, fabric or leather).

-------
 II.  PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES




     The  structure of vinyl chloride is as follows:


         H2C = CHC1      Molecular Weight m 62.5




     Vinyl  chloride is highly flammable (limits of inflamma-


 bility:  4.00-21.70%) and in sufficient concentrations (at


 least  1200-2000 ppm) has a sweet, pleasant odor.  The compound


 has  a  boiling point of -13.3'C.  Thus, at standard temperature

               •'•   .*   ' '        \
 and  pressure, vinyl chloride exists as a gas.  Vinyl chloride


 is only  sparingly soluble in water (0.11 g/100 g water at


 28*C), but is soluble in alcohol and very soluble in ether


 and  carbon tetrachloride.  The specific gravity of the chemical


 is 0.91; thus it would tend to rise to the surface of water.


 The  vapor  density of vinyl chloride is slightly more than


 twice  that of air (CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics,


 1978-1979? Braker and Mossman, 1971).




     The above information indicates that vinyl chloride is


 volatile and readily passes from water into the gas phase


 under  most laboratory and environmental conditions.  This was


 confirmed  in experiments where 16 mg/1 vinyl chloride was


 added  to distilled water in beakers and the concentration


 determined with time (U.S. EPA, 1974).  The data indicate


that if  first order kinetics are assumed, the volatilization


half-life  in quiescent water (unstirred) is 290 minutes and

-------
                            III-2
in continually stirred water is 25 .,8 minutes.  Dilling, et
al. (1975) found similar values for the stirred water.  As
Dilling, et al., note, predictions of vinyl chloride loss
from water at relatively high concentrations  (e.g., 1 mg/1)
may not reflect the situation at very low concentrations.

     Volatilization appears to be the most significant process
                             \
in the loss of vinyl chloride from the aquatic environment
(Hill, et al^ ,/. 1976)..  Once in the atmosphere, vinyl chloride
undergoes rapid photochemical oxidation (Gay, et aj..,1976;
Lillian et al., 1975).

-------
 IV.  PHARMACOKINETICS




     A.  Absorption  and Distribution



         An  investigation by Duprat et  al.  (1977) indicates



 that inhaled vinyl chloride is rapidly  absorbed by the lungs



 and immediately accumulates in the liver.   In this study,



 rats were exposed in a chamber to 20,000 ppm 14C vinyl chlo-



 ride for 5 minutes,  and then the distribution of radioactive

               '*
 vinyl chloride in the various body organs was determined.



 After 10 minutes exposure, radioactivity was found in the



 liver, bile  duct, digestive lumen, and  kidneys.  With increas-



 ing time (up to 3 hours), 14C activity  was  detected in the



 urinary system, salivary and lacrimal glands, skin and thymus.
                                •
                                *



     Using male Wistar rats, Withey (1976)  determined that



 vinyl chloride is rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal


 tract following gastric intubation of aqueous solutions



 containing up to 2.0 mg/ml vinyl chloride.  Vinyl chloride



 uptake by this route was extremely rapid; peak concentrations



were found less than 10 minutes after the dose was administered.




     In a study by Watanabe et al. (1976a), rats were given



 single oral  doses (gavage) of 0.05, 1,  or 100 mg/kg of 14O



vinyl chloride dissolved in corn oil, and the routes and rates



of elimination of 14C activity were followed for 72 hours.  The



percentage of the dose expired as vinyl chloride was 1, 2,



and 67%, respectively.  The disposition of  vinyl chloride to

-------
                               IV-3
Tissue
                            TABLE IV-1
                                      *
           Percentage of the Administered 14C Activity
                        per Gram of Tissue
           After Administration of,(14C) Vinyl Chloride
              by Gavage to Male Sprague-Dawley Rats3
                     (Watanabe et a_l., 1976a)
    0.05
                              Dose (ma/kg)*1
     1.0
   100
Liver
Skin
Carcass
Plasma
Muscle
Lung
Pat
0.172 i 0.025&
0.070 + 0.023
  •  *   »
Ol*027 + 0.007
0.041 + 0.004
0.028 i 0.003
0.050 +_ 0.003
0.030 + 0.004
0.182 + 0.005
0.076 + 0.010
0.046 + 0.002
0.053 + 0.007
0.031 + 0.003
0.061 i 0.003
0.045 + 0.008
0.029 + 0.002
0.010 +_ 0.002
0.007 + 0.001
0.006 + 0.001
0.011 + 0.001
0.006 + 0.001
a Remaining in the body after 72 hr.
" Mean ^ SE, five rats per dose
c Not detectable above background
d Vinyl chloride dissolved in corn oil

-------
                            IV- 4

                         TABLE IV- 2
                 Percentage of 1*C Activity
       per Gram Tissue 72 hr Following an Inhalation
              Exposure to (14C) Vinyl Chloride
            For 6 hr in male Sprague-Dawley Rats
                  (Watanabe et aU , 1976b)
Percentage
                                 activity
Exposure concentration
Tissue
Liver

Skin

Carcass

Plasma

Muscle

Lung

Fat

Kidney


0.139 +
0 ..141, +
0.072 +
0.073 7
0.048 +
0.049 7
0.051 +
0.052 7
0.052 +
0.053 +
0.065 +
0.066 +
0.026 +
0.026 7
0.079 +
0.080 7
10 ppm
0.009a (0:35)c
0.009&
0.004 (0.18)
0.004
0.004 (0.12)
0.004
0.001 (0.13)
0.001
0.005 (0.13)
0.005
0.007 (0.16)
0.007
0.006 (0.07)
0.006
0.003 (0.20)
0.003
1000 ppm
0.145 + 0.008a (9.63)c
0.165 + 0.009b
0.115 •»• 0,010 (7.64)
0.131 7 0.011
0.049 + 0.004 (3.26)
0.056 i 0.005
ND<3

0.038 + 0.003 (2.52)
0.043 + 0.003
0.046 + 0.001 (3.06)
0.052 i 0.001
NDd

0.057 + 0.005 (3.79)
0.065 + 0.006
a Expressed as percentage of total 14C activity per gram of
tissue.  Uncorrected for expired VC:
                      dpm per g tissue
                    total dpm recovered

Mean ± SE from four rats.
b Expressed as percentage metabolized 14C activity per gram
tissue*  Corrected for expired VC:
                    dpm per g of tissue
     Total dpm recovered minus dpm of expired VC
Mean + SE from rats.
c Micrograra equivalents vinyl chloride per gram of tissue.
d Not detectable, detection limit for plasma and fat was 3
ug/g of tissue (3ppm)

-------
                          IV-5
hours in a closed system, the percentage incorporated as
radioactivity per g tissue was highest for kidney (2.13)
and liver (1.86).-  The percent of incorporated activity
was 0.73 for the spleen and 0.17 for the brain.  Forty-
eight hours after the beginning of exposure, labeled material
could still be detected in these tissues.
   The percentage absorption of vinyl chloride from the
human gastrointestinal tract has not been established.
Because of the lack of data on percent absorption from the
gastrointestinal tract, the risk calculations in this
document will assume a 100% absorption factor.
     B.  Metabolism
         Metabolism of vinyl chloride occurs primarily in the
liver by microsomal enzymes.  There is strong evidence that
the toxicity of this compound is attributable to its
enzymatic oxidation to reactive polar metabolites.  Several
of these suspected metabolites are strongly mutagenic,
while vinyl chloride itself is not (Bartsch and Montesano,
1975).  Exposure to vinyl chloride leads to the reduction
of non-protein sulfhydryl levels in rat liver, suggesting
that the metabolites of vinyl chloride conjugate with
glutathione and/or cysteine (Hefner et al., 1975a).  Hathway
(1977) reported in vitro depurination of calf thymus DNA by
chloroacetaldehyde identical to that observed in hepatocyte

-------
                             IV-6
DNA following administration of vinyl chloride to rats in

vivo.  This suggests that vinyl chloride metabolites may

interact with some purine and pyrimidine residues of DNA,

providing a possible explanation for the oncogenic properties

associated with vinyl chloride.


     In a review of the literature, Bartsch and Montesano

(1975) report two possible biotransformation schemes - one
               •'•
involving alcohol dehydrogenase (Scheme I) and the other

involving the mixed function oxidase system (Scheme II).

These are indicated below:

Scheme I:    C1HOCH2	>C1H2C-CH2OH	>C1H2C-CHO	>C1H2C-COOH
                            o
Scheme II:   C1H=CH2	>[H2C-CHC1]	>C1H2C-CHO	>C1H2C-COOH


     Evidence for biodegradation involving the alcohol

dehydrogenase pathway includes data which demonstrates that

pretreatment of rats with either ethanol or pyrazole (an
                             %

inhibitor of alcohol dehydrogenase) inhibits the metabolism

of vinyl chloride (Hefner et al., 1975a).


     There is also ample evidence that the mixed function

oxidase (MFO) system is involved in the metabolism of vinyl

chloride.  Pretreatment of rats with phenobarbital, which

which induces the MFO system, also enhances liver toxicity of

vinyl chloride (Jaeger et a_l.,  1974).  Rat liver microsomes

catalyze the covalent binding of vinyl chloride metabolites to

-------
                             IV-7
protein and nucleic acids (Kappus et al., 1975; 1976); chloro-
ethylene oxide, which is thought to be formed by the MFO system,
may be the primary microsomal metabolite capable of alkylating
these intra-cellular macromolecules (Laib and Bolt, 1977).

     Several pathways may be involved in vinyl chloride metab-
olism, the predominant one depending on dose.  Hefner et al.
(1975) performed an inhalation study in which rats were
exposed to vinyl chloride concentrations ranging from 50.5%
to 1167.0 ppm for 12 months time.  The rate of metabolism,
as determined by measuring the declining level of vinyl
chloride in the chamber atmosphere, was three times greater
for seven separate exposures ranging from 50 to 105 ppm than
it was for five separate exposures ranging from 220 to 1167
ppm.  This indicated that the predominant pathway at the
lower concentrations, probably involving alcohol dehydrogenase,
is saturable between 105 and 220 ppm.  This group also found
evidence that oxidases in the microsomes may be involved in
metabolism at high level exposures.  In another study, Bolt
et al. (1977) subjected rats to an inspired concentration
of 14C-vinyl chloride ranging from 200 to 1200 ppm in a closed
system, and measured the rate of decrease of vinyl chloride
levels in the chamber atmosphere.  This group calculated
that saturation of the vinyl chloride-metabolizing enzymes
of the rat is achieved at 250 ppm.

-------
                              rv-8
     C.  Excretion

         Excretion of ^C activity within 72 hours following
a single oral dose of 14C-labeled vinyl chloride (0*05,
1»0, or 100 mg/Tcg) is shown in Table IV-3 (Watanabe et al.,
1976a).  As the dose increases, a markedly greater proportion
of vinyl chloride is expired unmetabolized,  while the percent-
age of metabolite .in the urine decreases substantially.
               •'•••'"        \
Again, saturation kinetics are suggested.  The table also
indicates that metabolites of vinyl chloride are predominantly
excreted via the urine.  Administration of vinyl chloride by
inhalation produced almost identical results (Watanabe et al.,
1976b).  Two major metabolites in the urine are identified
as indicated in Table IV-4.

     Buchter et al. (1980) examined the metabolic elimination
of vinyl chloride in Rhesus monkeys.  Rhesus monkeys were placed
in a closed exposure system into which vinyl chloride was in-
jected, and air samples taken to determine the decline of
vinyl chloride in the gas phase of the system.  The results
showed that the metabolic elimination of vinyl chloride in
Rhesus monkeys is a dose-dependent, saturable process, as in
rats.  Elimination was shown to obey a first-order law

-------
                              IV-9
                           TABLE  IV- 3
       Percentage of Administered    c Activity Recovered
        Following a Single  Oral  Dose of Vinyl Chloride*
                    (Watanabe  et al., 197 6a)
                                Dose  (mg/kg)
                      0.05
                    1.0
      100
Expired:
As VC
As CO 2
Urine
Feces

1
8
68
2

.43
.96
.34
.39

± °
± °
+ 0

.*59
.54
.52

2
13
59
2

.13 +
.26 +
.30 +
.20 +

0.22
0.47
2.75
0.39

66
2
10
0

.64
.52
.84
.47

•f
+
+
+

0.67
0.13
0.95
0.06
Carcass and
    tissues

Cage washc

Total recovery
 10.13  +' 1.93    11.10  + 0.47

       0         0.84  + 0.45

/ 91.25 + 2.47   88.83  + 1.98
 1.83 + 0.14

      0

82.30 + 0.43
a Percentage of dose excreted over 72 hr.  Only the 14C
    activity associated with the expired VC can be
    attributed to VC per se.

b Mean + SE five rats per dose.

c Distilled water wash of metabolism cage at termination
    of the study.

-------
                            IV-10
                          TABLE  IV-4

              14C-containing Urinary Metabolites
                from Male  Sprague-Dawley Rats
               Given Vinyl Chloride by Gavagea
                   (Watanabe et  al., 1976a)
                               Dose  (mg/kg)
  Compound               0.05(4)b     1.0(5)        100(5)



  N-acetyl-S-(2-
  hydroxyethyl-
  cysteine)            30.4 + 2.0C    36.2 + 3.9    29.1 + 2.0

  Thiodiglycolic acid  25.6 + 1.9     23.7+1.1    25.4+0.9

  Unidentified         38.6 + 2.9     34.5 + 4.6    36.6 + 2.0

  Total                      94.6           94.6          91.1
Metabolites were separated and quantitated by high
  pressure liquid chromatography.  Values are expressed
  as percentage of total urinary radioactivity.
( ) = Number of animals per dose

Mean + SE

-------
                           IV-11

below 200-300 ppm, and at high concentrations the maximal
velocity of metabolic elimination" of vinyl chloride was
about half that of rats when related to kg body weight.

     Green and Hathway (1975) measured the excretion of 14O
vinyl chloride administered to rats by intragastricr
intravenous (femoral vein), or intraperitoneal routes.  Two
doses were used.:  0.25 mg/kg and 450 mg/kg.  The results
are shown in Table IV-5.  During the first 24 hours after
treatment, more than 90 percent was excreted from the
animals for all three routes.  Significant differences were
noted, however, in the manner of excretion for the 0.25
mg/kg dose.  For the intragastric route, 71.5% was excreted
in the urine, whereas 99% was exhaled from the lungs when
vinyl chloride was administered intravenously.  For the
intraperitoneal route, 43.2% was exhaled while 41.5% was
excreted in the urine.   At the higher dose (450 mg/kg),
over 90% was exhaled as vinyl chloride in both intragastric
and intraperitoneal administered rats.  The intragastric
values are consistent with the values reported in the oral
studies performed by Watanabe et al., (1976a) (see Table
IV-3).

     Withey and Collins (1976) have developed a statistical
model for use in equating oral dose levels of vinyl chloride
to inhalation exposure levels in rats, using blood level

-------
                                                   IV-12



                                                  TABLE IV-5

                                            (Green and Hathway,  1975)


TN OF RADIOACTIVITY IN RATS, GIVEN A SINGLE DOSE OF  114C]VINYL CHLORIDE
 ere each dosed i.g. with 250ug of [^Clvinyl chloride per kg  in corn oil solution, and another 4 rats were each
 milarly with 450 mg of lUcjvinyl chloride per kg.   4 rats were each injected in the  femoral vein with 250 ug of
 tyl chloride per kg in N-(B-hydroxyethyl)lactamide.   Four rats were  each injected i.p.  with 250 ug of [14C]vinyl
 , per kg in N-(B-hydroxyethyl) lactamide, and another 4  animals  were each injected similarly with 450 mg of  l1401
loride.


   Time     Radioactivity excreted (% of dose)3
    (h)		:	

          Intragastric	Intravenous   	      Intraperitoneal	
          Exhaled air   	    Urine     Fe/»s        Exhaled air   Urine  Feces    Exhaled air	Urine    Fecea

          Vinyl      (X>2                              Vinyl        002              Vinyl    002
          chloride                                    chloride                      chloride


 kg  0-24 3.7 +  1.2 12,6 + 1.1 71.5 +  5.6  2.8 + 2.5  99.0 + 0.8  0.1  0.5  0.1  43.2 + 4.6 10.3 + 2.2  41.5 + 4.8 1.6
    24-48      ~        0.9"    3.3         1.6                           -.                     0.7       1.6       0.2^
    48-72                       0.3      ' *' 0.2
    Total 3.7 +  1.2 13.5 + 1.3 75.1 +  4.2. 4.6 + 3.0  99.0 + 0.8  0.1  0.5  0.1  43.2 + 4.611.0 + 1.2  43.1 + 5.71.8

 kg  0-2491.9 +  2.5   0.6      4.5  +2.3   0.4                                   96.2+4.10.7        2.5  +.0.90.1
    24-48              0.1      0.8          0.3                                                         0.1
    48-72                       0.1
    Total 91.9 +_  2.5  0.7      5.4  +_  2.2  0.7                                   96.2 + 4.1 0.7        2.6  +_ 0.9 0.1



;s shown are the means + S.O. 'of those means.

-------
                            IV-13
time curves.  The authors concluded that "if the total daily
liquid intake contained 20 ppra vinyl chloride, then the area
generated under the blood level time curve, for rats, would
be equivalent to an inhalation exposure of about 2 ppm for
24 hours."  Thus, according to this model,  inhalation exposure
is ten times more efficient than oral exposure.

-------
 VI-  HEALTH EFFECTS IN ANIMALS

      A.  Acute/Chronic Effects
      Acute toxicity tests with vinyl chloride were carried
 out by Patty et al. (1930) of the Bureau of Mines, Department
 of Commerce.  Single exposure of guinea pigs to vinyl chloride
 gas,  10 percent in air (100,00 ppm),  resulted in narcosis and
 death within 30 to 60 minutes.  Inhalation of lower concentra-
               .'•  '•  ' •         *
 tions resulted in'ataxia and narcosis.   Pathological findings
 at necropsy were congestion and edema of the lungs and hypere-
     of the kidneys  and  liver.   A number of investigators  have
      similar observations when examining the acute inhalation
 Affects of vinyl chloride in mice,  rats,  guinea pigs,  rabbits,
 cats,  dogs (Peoples and Leake,  1933;  Lester et al.,  1963;
 Mastromatteo et  a_l.,  1960;  Haley,  1975;  Prodan et  al.,  1975).
    animal  studies,  LCSO's at 2  hours  ranged from 117,500  ppm
    mice to  230,800 ppm for rabbits.
     Marsteller  et  al.  (1975)  reviewed  and summarized  the
 findings of  previous studies on vinyl chloride exposure in
 laboratory animals.  Torkelson  et al. (1961)  exposed test
animals to concentrations ranging from  50  to  500 ppm.  Rats
e«posed to 100 ppm  (2 hours/day  for 6 months)  were  judged
normal on the basis of appearance, mortality,  growth,
hematological examination and other factors.   However, a

-------
                            VI-2
 slight increase in the liver weight was observed.   Rats,
 guinea pigs,  rabbits,  and dogs exposed to 50 ppra (7 hours/day,
 130 times in  189.days) appeared to be normal in appearance,
 mortality,  and growth, and the increase in weight  of  the
 rat livers  did not occur at this concentration.  Basalaev
 et al.  (1972)  administered gaseous vinyl chloride  to  rats
 and rabbits at a concentration of 0.03-0.04 mg/1 for  4
 hours/day for § months.   Cardiovascular disorders,  changes
 in the  bioelectric activity of the hypothalamus,
 hyperadrenalinemia,  osteoporosis and resorption of bone
 tissue  were observed.

      Jaeger (1975)  conducted experiments with rats to
 determine the  interaction between vinylidene chloride (1,1-
 DCE)  and  vinyl chloride.   In this study,  hepatotoxicity was
 measured  by the. elevation of serum alanine-oC-fcetoglutarate
 transaminase  (AKT).  When fasted rats  were exposed to 0.02%
 (V/V),  1,_1-DCE,  serum  AKT activity was elevated  about 50-
 fold, two hours  after  the termination  of a 4-hour  inhalation
 exposure.   No  elevation was  observed when 0.1% vinyl  chloride
was administered alone.   When the two  chemicals  were
administered simultaneously  at the levels indicated,  no
elevation of serum AKT occurred.   Thus,  the vinyl  chloride
was protective.  These two monomers  are  used together in the
production  of vinyl  copolymers,  and  exposure to  both  agents
in the workplace was reported  by Kramer  and Mutchler  (1972).

-------
                          VI-3
    B.  Teratogenicity



        John et al. (1977) examined the effects of vinyl


 chloride inhalation on the fetuses of mice, rats, and


 rabbits.  The pregnant animals were exposed 7 hours daily


 to concentrations of 50 or 500 ppm for mice and 500 or 2500


 ppm for rats and rabbits.  Mice and rats were exposed on


 days 6 to 15 of gestation, and rabbits on days 6 to 18.

                •*   •*
 Ho teratogenic effects were observed at 2500 ppm in rats


 and rabbits, except that a greater incidence of dilated


 ureters were noted in rats.  Indeed, vinyl chloride exposure


 at this level actually decreased the incidence of certain


 skeletal anomalies in rats compared to controls (e.g.,
                                 *

 delayed ossification of the bones of the skull, and unfused


 centers of ossification of the skull and sternebrae).   Mice
i

 were the most sensitive to vinyl chloride.  No teratogenic

|                    /
 effects were noted in the fetuses of mice exposed to 50


iPprn,  but a .significantly greater incidence of unfused


 sternebrae and delayed ossification of sternebrae (no.  5)


 and  bones  of the  skull were observed among litters  of mice


 exposed to 500 ppm compared to unexposed controls.


 Embryotoxic  effects were not generally noted,  but some


 decrease in fetal body weight and crown-rump length was


 observed in  rats  and  mice.

-------
                          VI-4
     Radike et al.  (1977a) did not observe gross  (nonmicro-
                       •
scopic) abnormalities in the offspring of rats exposed 4

hours daily on the  9th to the 21st "day of gestation by inha-

lation of 600 or'6000 ppm vinyl chloride.  A small increase

in the incidence of minor skeletal abnormalities, including

wavy ribs, extra 14th ribs and delayed calcification of

small bones, were observed in the offspring of the exposed

animals.  However,  the investigators concluded that such a

small incidence* is  difficult tJb distinguish from a sporadic

occurrence, and should be considered to be skeletal variants

and not malformations.


     Groups of pregnant CF-1 mice, Sprague-Dawley rats and

New Zealand white rabbits were exposed to doses of vinyl

chloride ranging from 50 to 2500 ppm by inhalation.  Exposure

to these concentrations of vinyl chloride did not cause any

significant embryonal or fetal toxicity and vas not teratogenic
                    i

in any of the three species tested. (John et al., 1981).


     C.  Mutagenicity

         Vinyl chloride is mutagenic in a number of biological

systems.  The mutagenic action of vinyl chloride appears to

be dependent upon its metabolic conversion to chemically

reactive metabolites (e.g., chloroethylene oxide, 2 chloro-

acetaldehyde).  The mutagenic effects of vinyl chloride have

been demonstrated in:  (1) nsetabclically activated systems

-------
                             VI-5

using Salmonella typhimuriuro (Bartsch et al., 1975; McCann
et al., 1975; Elmore et al., 1976; Rannug et al./ 1974;
Garro et al., 1976) developed by Ames et al. (1973) in which
the genetic  indicator refers to histidine prototrophy by
base-pair substitutions! or by base-pair insertions or dele-
tions;  (2) Escherichia coli K12 bioauxotrophic strain with
back mutation system arginine + (Greim et a_l., 1975); (3)
several species; o£ yeast inducing forward mutations and gene
                              \
conversions  at specific loci (Loprieno et aJL., 1976, 1977);
(4) in germ  cells of Drosophila (Verburgt and Vogel, 1977)
and (5) Chinese hamster V79 cells (Huberman et al., 1975).
The literature on the mutagenic effects of vinyl chloride
were reviewed by Bartsch and Montesano (1975).

     The mutagenic activity of inhaled vinyl chloride (3000,
10,000 or 30,000 ppm for 6 hours a day for 5 days) was
                   .'
assessed in  infertile male CD-I strain mice with the dominant
lethal assay (Anderson et al ., 1976).  At these concentrations,
vinyl chloride was not mutagenic as judged by scoring of
post-implantation fetal deaths, pre-implantation egg losses
and reduction in fertility.  Positive control tests indicated
that the dominant lethal effect was expressed in the CD-I
mice used in these experiments.

     Anderson and Richardson (1976) conducted a cytogenic
study investigating mutagenic effects in the bone marrow

-------
                              VI-6
 cells of rats after exposure to paradichlorobenzene at various
 dose levels.   In this study, benzene and vinyl chloride were
 used as positive controls.   The results of the vinyl chloride
 control showed that vinyl chloride was effective in producing
 chromosome damage in rat bone marrow after the multiple
 exposure regime.

      D.  Carcinogenicity
          Eviden.ce"has been  accumulated in recent years impli-
 cating vinyl  chloride as a  human and animal carcinogen.
 The first four human cases  of liver angiosarcoma in workers
 employed by a vinyl chloride plant were reported by Creech
 and Johnson in 1974.   The first experimental data on the
 carcinogenic  effect of vinyl chloride in rats were published
 by  Viola et al.,  in 197i; preliminary results of an investi-
 gation concerned with the oncogenic potential of vinyl chloride
 in  experimental  animals  followed (Maltoni and Lefemine,  1974).
 These  initial  reports spurred a series  of retrospective  epidemi-
 ologic investigations of workers in the vinyl chloride industry
 and  supportive experimental  studies  in  animals.   Several compre-
hensive  reviews  and symposium proceedings  have been published
on the  subject (e.g.,  Selikoff and Hammond,  1975;  Proceedings
of the Royal Society  of  Medicine,  1976;  U.S.  EPA,  1975c;
Milby, 1978).

-------
                           VI-7
     In animal studies, Viola et aJL. (1971) reported the
carcinogenic response of male rats (AR/IRE Wistar strain)
exposed to vinyl chloride by inhalation (Table VI-1).  Skin
tumors were first noted at approximately 10 months; tumors
in the lungs and bones were observed at about 11 months.

     Caputo et al. (1974) exposed male and female rats (A and
IRE Winstar strain) by inhalation to various concentrations
of vinyl chloride*  Carcinomas and sarcomas were observed
            -   .•
in all groups except those exposed to 50 ppm (Table VI-2).
As can be observed, a dose response relationship exists
between exposure of 50 to 20,000 ppm.  Tumors appeared
between 8 and 13 months from the beginning of the inhalation
treatment.  These investigations also exposed rabbits by
inhalation to 10,000 ppm vinyl chloride, for 15 months (Table
VI-2) and reported the occurrence of lung and skin carcinomas.

     Recent inhalation studies with albino CD-I mice and CD
rats (Charles River Breeding Lab) confirm the carcinogenicity
of vinyl chloride at concentrations as low as 50 ppm  (Lee
e_t a_l., 1977, 1978).  Liver angiosarcomas as well as other
forms of cancers were found in both species.
     An extensive examination of vinyl chloride  in experimental
animals has been conducted by Maltoni  (1981).  A summary of
these results are presented in Tables VI-*3 - VI-19.  Vinyl

-------
                           VI-8

chloride was shown to cause tumors in all the animal systems
tested (i.e., mice, rats and hamsters) both through inhalation
and ingestion exposure.  A clear-cut dose-response relationship
was shown to exist, with carcinogenic effects being seen at
exposures as low as 50 ppm.  Newborn animals appeared to be
especially sensitive to the development of hepatocarcinomas and
angiosarcomaa and carcinogenic effects on the embryo via the
placenta were demonstrated.  Table VI-20 indicates the tumor
                              \
types that have been correlated to vinyl chloride exposure in
experimental animals.

                        TABLE VI-1
       Oncogenic Effects of Inhaled Vinyl Chloride
                   (Viola et al.« 1971)
Cone. VC
(pprn)
4 hrs/day,
5 days/wk
12 months
30,000
No treatment



Number
Rats
26
25
Skin
Epider-
moid Carci-
nomas

17
-
Lung
Adenocarci-
nomas &
Squamous cell
Carcinomas
6
'

Bones
Osteo-
chondroma

5
-

-------
                  VI-9
               TABLE VI-2

Incidence of Tuners in Rats and Rabbits
Exposed to Vinyl Chloride by Irfcalation
         (Caputo et al., 1974)
(ppn)
4 hrs/day
5 days/vdc
12 months

20,000
10,000
5,000
2,000
500
50
No
Treatment


10,000
No
Treatment
# of
Aniirals
Rats
150
200
200
200
150
200

200
Rabbits
40

20

Liver
Angiosaroonas
Cholangianas

31
16
12
10
4
-

*•





Lung Skin Squa-
Adeno- ncus Cell
Alveolar Carcinana
Cardnonas AcanthonB

21 67
16 34
4 20
8 6
3
-


6 12

— «


Other

7
8
2
6
-
—


-

-



-------
                                          VI-10
                                     Table VI-3
                                                    Zzptrincot BTL*
                                                            Animtli •with tamori.
                       TomonOOO
Gram and-
MT
                    BT    LAS    LA   ELAS  EIA  taoaa
                          Hep*- Kephro- titan- Zymbal
                                 BL    BL   GLCt
                                                                Skin
                                                                EpT
                                                                                    Ton-
                                                                                   stomach
                                                                                   PmAAe
                                                                                                   mar?
                                                                                                    HI
         10,000 ppm
             U
8L7   flJ   1L7
                                                                                       6.0
             •0.0
              6.0    6.0    1.7     IX   11.7    26.7
             a/so)   (3*0)  wean  wreo)  a«o)  ae/so]
 22.0    14    S.1    6J    L7     15    6.1    11.9    14    L7
(IS/59)  #39)  (3/59)   (4/59)  (1*9)  (6/59)  (3/59)   (7/69)  (2/59)  (1/69)
                                                                                           5.0
— -"• rr^
m
2500 ppm
IV
600 ppm
jfljQ -_
VI
60 ppm
VII

(eoBtnl)
6LS
5LT
30.0

16.0


lit

20.0
• us
25.0

86.7


413

n.7
03*0)
10.0
(WO)
6.1
(8/69)
L7


..

4.0
(3/60)
L7
,0*0)
L7 N 14
0/69) (2/59)
L7
(1/60)

. —

IS
L7
0*0)

13
a/en

14
aw
is
(2/60)
(5*0)
L7
(1/69)
•


—

10.0
(&»)
10.0
(6/60)
16
(6/59)
L7
(1«)

•

6.7 IS
(4/60) (2/60)
6.7
(4/60)

— —


— —

1.7
(1/60)
L7
(1*0)
14
8/59)
1.7
0*0)

1.7
0/58)
13
(2*0)
L7
(1*60)
3.4
a»)
L7 IS
(1/60) (2/80)

- -

        •Expanut by inhilition to VC in iir tt 10,000, 6000, 2500, 600, 250, ud 50 ppm; 4 hr/day, 6 d«yVw««k, for 62 wteki.
      Spr««u^D«wley nu, M «nd F, 13 «Mks old. RaalU after 135 wwka (cad of experiment).
                                     Table  VIT4
                                                    Experiment BTZ.*
                                                            Animala with tumon. %
Group and
              TumonOOO
               animala
MT
                    BT   LAS    LA   ELAS  ELA  tomaa
                                                                                             Fort-  Min>-
                                                            Hepa- Nephro- Neuro- Zymfaal  Skin  itomach mary
                                                                    BL    BL   GLC*   EpT  PaAAc  MT
I
200 ppm
U .
160 ppm
HI
mJT
Kotmtmeat
(oontni)
35.0

35.0

2L7

16.7

2L7

25.0

T1A

2L6

10.0
(12020)
6.0
(8019)
(L8
(1020)
_

18
(4020)
.

OJ
0020)
«.

0.8
(1020)
.

_

LI
O085)
as
(1/120)
as
a/itt)
.

«.

16
(8020)
_

—

.

6.8
(7020)
9^
ani9)
u —
(10/120)
_ _

13
(4O20)
14
(47119)
0.8
(1020)
LI
(2085)
4.2
(6020)
14
(4019)
0.8
(1020)
LI
(Z085)
6.0
(6020)
1.7 5.0
(2019) (6019)
13 13
(4020) (4020)
1.6 1.0
(3/185) (2085)
       •Ezpoture by inhalation to VC in air at 200. 160, 100 ppm; 4 hr/diy, S dayi/week, for 52 weeka. Sprague-Dawley nta, M and F, 13
     w«eka old. Result* after 143 vteka (cad of experiment).
Source:    Maltoni,   1981.

-------
                                       VI-11



                                    Table VI-5
                                                  Experiment BTS.*
                                   	i with tnroort. %

                         Tunora/100
           Group nd      ^^~~~~~~>                         H«p»- Nephro- Nemo» Zynbil  Skin ttotnaeh any
          MMirtTitinn      MT    BT   LAS   LA   ELAS  ELA  toau  BL   BL  GLCa  EpT  PsAAc  XT

              i         IOOQ   5J!oioioLT    LTto    LT    I    LT   SO   LT    IO   is
           90,000 ppa                 (1&60)  (L«0)  (MO)  (SfiO)  (1/50)        (I/GO)  (3SGO)  (1^0)  (1I«0) W80)

        •Eapo«iT»bymhal«tioBtoVCia«irit30,OOOppm;4hr/d»y. S dtyt/wcck, for 52 weeks. Spngue-Dtwleyr»U, MandF, 17w««la
      old. Ruufti after 68 wMks (end of cxpchaoit).
                                    Table VI-6
                                                    Aninala irith unnor».
                 	                                Bepa- Kephro- Neuro- Zymbal  Skin itomacfa mary
                 MT    BT   IAS   LA  ELAS  ELA  tout  BL   BL  GLCa   EpT  PiAAe  MT

                 •53—53—IS   S   Zi   5!?    I    S3    I    u    To    o.4    21.7
                                  (8094)

            .     -««ft          _
           nt     &0   «.w    -
     (euuuul)
" •rT««. hy if.K^i«. «• ve fa .fa. «t M ppm 4 hr/div. 6 diyi/week. for 52 wtekt. Sprague-Dtwley r»t». M «nd F. 13 wcek« old.

Kcnlu «ftcr 142 vecks («d of czpemtutX
 Source:    Maltoni,   1981.

-------
                                    VI-12
                                •TABLE VI-7
                                        ExperiaortBllS.*
                                                 Animals with tenors. *
               TraxnOOO
                                                                                Ton-  Mun-
Qnnpnd
•OCB&BtMQ
I
IS ppm
„»

10 ppm
m
ippm
IV
Ippm
No trauma*
(eootnt)
MT BT LAS
I3y jgj 4.2
(&020)
«L7 534 0.8
0/119)
SSJ 86,0
'
y* K 44.2 —

254 17.S '-

LA
0.8.
a/i20)
_

.,

_

— m

ELAS
_

LT
(2019)
_

_

—
\
Hep*- Kephro- N«aro>
2LA tcnm BL BL
2.5
O020)
2.5
(3019)
•

—

0.8
(1020)
0.8
a/i2o)
• —

— _

— —

^ ^

_

—

.

_

^

CLCa
8.3
(4020)
1.7
(2O19)
0.8
0/119)
0.8
o/iis)
L7
(2020)
Skin
EpT
_

—

0.8
(1019)
0.8
(1/118)
—

•tomadb maiy
Pa&Ac MT
15.0
O7020)
17.6
(21019)
18.5
(22019)
12.7
(15018)
6.8
(7020)
 txpenrt by mhaktian to VC in sir it 25,10,5,1 ppm; 4 hr/day, 5 diytfwMk, for 52 veekt. Spngw-Dtwley nu, 11 and F, 13
Mb «ld. Eeculu after 147 wwks (end of uperiacBtX.
                                TABLE  VI-8
                                         Experiment BT1.*
Animal*

TmoonOOO
Grocpmd
CODOEOtntMO
I
10,000 ppm
n
(000 ppm
H
tSOOppo
IV
SO ppm
VI

No treatment
(eoBtreD
•Cxno*m* bv i

MT
45.0
A3
4L7
15.0
n.7

14.7
nhilitiofl

BT
20.0
25.0
85.0
S6.0
25.0
26.0

20.0
to VC
LAS
L7
L7
OAO)
L7
—
-
-
in air at
LA
-
-
L7
O/S9)
L7
OA8)
-
10,000,
ELAS
- '
-
~

0.6
0090)
ELA
1.7
(1^8)
8.S
-
L7
(1A9)
L7
0/58)
-
6000, 2500, 500,
Hep*- Nephr>
tomaa BL
1.7
1.7
8.8
(ZfiO)
—

-
L7
0/58)
1.7
(1/60)
8.3
<2«0)
(609)
Ut
(8/58)
-
Fore-
Mara-
Neuro Zyrabat Skin Romach mary
BL • GLCt EpT Pa&Ac MT
15.5
(9^8)
20.0
(12*60)
8.3
(SW)
I

-
15.6 8.6 1,7
(9^8) (5/53) 0/53)
16.0 8.3 3.3
(9/60) (6*0) (2/60)
11.7 8.3
1.7
wan
1.7 - 5.1
(1/59) (3/59)
1.7
0/58)
1.0 0.5
(2090) OO90)
250. and 50 ppm; 4 hr/diy, 5 daya(*eek, for
1.7
(1/58)
1.7
6.7
5.0
(S*0)
1.7
(1/B9)
1.7
(1/58)
2.6
(5090)
17 weeka.
       .ley »u, H aad F. 12 weeka old. R*«uHa aft«r 156 week* (end at experiment).
Source:    Maltoni,  1981.

-------
                                        VI-13
                                     TABLE VI-9
Experiment BT10.*


Greopand
""•'•"•"MI
I
10,000 ppo
u
"V
10,000 ppo
IV
6000 nn
y*-
10,000 ppo
VI
6000 ppn
NotrcatasBt
(coatnO
•AH!

MT
RS

80.0
3SJ
*
• • *
304'

4L7

fy f

18.6

aak

BT
4L7

4fi.O
45.0

39.2

45.0

£0.8

4LO



LAS
as
a/118)
•
0.8
(1/119)
2.5
(SOU)
OJ
(1119)
0.8
a/120)
^



LA ELAS
_ _

OJ
a/120)
L7
(2019)
L7
«018)
L7
aou)
L7 0.8
(2020) 0/120)
— —



ELA
0.8
OA18)
L7
(2020)
OJ
a/ii9)
•

OJ
a/u9)
•

0.4
(12ST)
Aninuli with tureon. *

Bcpa-
tOBUft
0.8
oau)
_
^

••

•

L7
C2020)
^


Nephra.
BL
»

0.8
0/120)

•

0.8
0/119)
0.8
(1/120)
—


• Neun>-
BL
_

OJ
(1020)

_

0.8
(1/119)
.

—


Zytnbal
GLCa
7.6
(9018)
7.5
0020)
7.6
(9/119)
4£
(5/118)
6.7
(8019)
7.5
CiO20)
—


Skin
EpT
_

•
IS
OO19)
8.4
(4/118)
0.8
(1119)
_

0.9
(2227)
Fort- Man-
stomach nary
Pa*Ac MT
2.5 11.0
(3/118) (13/118)
1.7 10.8
(2020) (13020)
2.5 13.4
(3/119) (16019)
1.7 9.3
(2018) (Iini8)
0.8 16J
(1019) (20019)
0.8 10.0
(1020) (12020)
2.2 7.5
(5^27) (17«7)
      •Expomn far Jnh»l*tioo to VC fe iir « 10,000, 6000, ppm; 4 hr/day, 5 feyi/week, for 5 weeks (groupt I and II) or 1 hr/diy. 4
    uyvwcek, for*2S w««k« (group* III and IV) or 4 hr/day, one* weekly, tor 25 week* (froupi V and VI) (100 hr). Sprague-Dawley fits.
    » «nd F, 18 vaekt old. Result* after 154 weeks (end of experiment).
                                   TABLE VI-10
                                                   Experiment BT5.*
                        Tumon/lOO
                                                            Animats with tumon. *
         Group and
        eonecatnta
Hepe- Nephro> Neuro- Zynbal
tomas   BL    BL   GICa
Skin
EpT
 Fore-  Mini-
itomach nur>-
Pa&Ac  MT
                                                                                 9.8    .     ±0    2.0
                                                                                 (5V51)        (USD   (1/51)
                                                                                 9.4    3.1    3.1    6.2
                                                                                 (3/32)  (1/32)  (1/32)   (2/32)^

Source:    Maltoni,   1981.

-------
                                        VI-14



                                   TABLE  VI-11
                                                   Experiment BT14."
                       T«Baan/100                             Animali with tcnora, »
                        •amah                                                               Fore-  Man>
        Groop ad      ————.                           Hepa- Nephro- Ktoro- Zymbil  Skin  itomacb marjr
                       MT    BT    LAS    LA   ELAS  ELA  tonu   BL   BL   GLCa   EpT  PaAAc  MT
           I
       10,000 pptn       16.7   6S.7
       (breeder*)
           n
        60001
           ni
       10,000 ppm      100.0   KJ>   84.1                 «J    45.4           -     13    13     -     -
        (newborn)      "    •'       OW4)      ,         (&/44)  (20/44)               (1/44)  (1/44)
           IV                                 *
        «000pn      10U   UL1   405    2.4    14    14    <7.«    .           4.8    4.8     -    14
                                   Q7/42)  CWO   (1/42}  (1/42)  (20/42)               (2/42)  (2/42)        (1/48
    •Ezpocurt by jafaaiidon to VC in air «t 10,000 «nd 6000 ppm, 4 hr/dty, 5 dayVwcck, for 5 weeks (from 1 d»r to 5 weeki of •(•)•
   Spngue-Dawley nta, M tnd F, 21 weeJcs old (breeder*) (groups I and II) md newborn (group* III and IV). Result* after 124 wetb
   VW*^M 04 VA|Mi* m
                                    TABLE  VI-12



                                              Ezpcrimcnt BT7.'
    Group and
   coneentntioB
Ttnion/100

XT
60.0
63-J
26.7
80.0

13J
16.7

15.0


BT
10.0
20.0
UL8
10.0

16.7
6.7

15.0

Animals with tornon,

LAS
29.6
(8/27)
11.5
(306)
12.0
(805)
10.7
(808)
8.7
007)
_

—


LA
-
7.7
(206)

8.6
(108)
—
•

—


ELAS
-
8.8
(1O6)
4.0
OOS)
—

8.7
(107)
-.

16
(V38)

ELA
-
8.8
(106)
—
—

8.7
007)
—
,
_


Hipa-
tanas
-
7.7
(206)
4.0
O05)
—

^m
—

.


Nephro*
BL
3.7
7.7
—
7.1
COS)
^
8.6
(1O8)
.

*

Neuro-
BL
11.1
(SOT)
8.8
(1O6)
4.0
(105)
—

"
—

•



Zymbal
GLCa
7.4
C2O7)
7.7
(206)
"
•


•"

-



Skin
EpT
••^•••^•^
^
*
4.0
(105)
*•

3.7
(107)
—

-
•MMMM^.^
i 	 «/:_..

Fore-
stomach
PaiAc
^^•MMeMBBM
^
^

"*


™"

-
^•••••••••••iKB
.-.». U
"•Expowr* by inhalation to VCfa*ir it 10.000,6000,2500,500,2M.*nd 50 ppm;4hr/day,5day»^reek.for«weeks. Wistar rat.. M,
U vtekt old. Remit* after 165 week* (end of experiment).
Source:    Maltoni,  1981.

-------
                                       VI-15
                                  TABLE VI-13
     Groopnd
                         BT
             7«~   IA    r-t .c   T-T .   Htp*'  Nepfaro- N«uro-  Zymial  Skin  •touch
             ***»   1-A    ELAS   SLA   isau   SL    BL   GLCt  EpT  ^^
                         294
    No
                    1.0    8.0    6,0    LO
                   0/99)   (8/99)  (S/99)   (1/99)
                                                                             ±0
      (control)
mo
                                                           12
                                                          (3*4)
 1.1
(1/94)
                                         'S*^
                                  TABLE VJ-14
                                            Experiment BT4.*
Animils vith toman, %
Tisnen/IOO nails
Groopnd
cofKcnmtm
I
10,000 pom
n
6000 pan
m
2900 ppa
WOppo
V
250 ppo
VI
60 ppa
VU
We fj-Lj»TT»gMt
(eaotroO



HimTTUTT Slnp
MT
60.0

68.7

684
684

04

284


14.7

BT
984

100.0

90.0
1034

984

nit


14.7

LAS
174
(10/56)
21.7
(1&60)
27.1
284
(14«0)
80.0
OSfiO)
1.7
(WO)
•
•

LA
10.7
(6/56)
11.7
(7/50)
8.S
84
(WO)
184
(11/50)
• 1.7
0*0)

•

ELAS
14
U/56)
L7
(W80)
18.5
1L7
(7)60)
6.0
(X130)
L7
(1/60)

0.7
(V160)
ELA
7.1
(4^6)
6.0
(8/60)
1.7
(1^9)
6.0
(MO)
6.0
(8fiO)
84
(6ASO)

0.7
(inso)
LangT
82.1
(4606)
784
(47/60)
674
(40/59)
834
(SOW)
684
(41/60)
10.0
(6«0)

10.0
(1M50)
Ca
234
aa«)
134
(MO)
18.6
OVS9)
18.3
CB/60)
20.0
(12/60)
20.0
(1ZW)

0.7
0/150)
EpT
7.1
(4^6)
11.7

6.8
(4/S9)
8.3
(2/60)
1.7
(1/60)

_

14

Fora-
ttonsch
Pa&Ae
14
(1/56)
1.7

1.7
(1/59)

L7
(1/60)
1.7
(1/60)

«.

  •Eipotan by inhiktion to VC fa tir at 10,000,6000,2500.600,250, tnd 50 ppm; 4 hr/d*y. 5 
-------
                                          VI-16
                                      TABLE  VI -15
                                                   ExperiflMot BTC.*

animals
Group and
•oocotmioa
10,000 pern
n
WOO ppm
III
2500 pea
IV
B00vpp»
250 Ppm
vj
SOppn
jrn

(control}

MT
10.0
40.0

4SJ

B-J,
30.0

10.0


20.0


BT
73J
«34

U&3

63.3
•
413

40.0


46.7


LAS
-
84
(WO)
_

v 4.7
800)

•


•«.


LA
8.3
(WO)
8.3
(WO)
6.7
000)
—
—

•


^
•

ZLA
6.7
•

—

SJ
00))
13
(WO)
•


^

Animals with tmnon. %

Hep*- Giolan- Cholan-
tenaa fio-Ca guana
8.7 18.3
(2/30) (4/30)
3JJ 6.7 16.7
(WO) (ZOO) (5/30)
26.7
(8/30)
20.0
(600)
20.0
(630)
2U
(7/30)

86.7

Acoustic
Duet
EpT
13
(WO)
6.7
(200)
S.3
(WO)
10.0
(3^0)

.


—

Skin
EpT
±3.3
'sj
(WO)
10.0
(3^0)
23.3
(7/30)
10.0
(3^0)
80.0
(8/30)

5.0

Mela-
nftmsi
3.3
(WO)
6.7
C230)
3.3
(WO)
.
3.3
(WO)
3J
(WO)

—

Fort-

•tomachLeukae-
PaeUc
83.3
do/so)
33.3
(10/30)
56.7
(17/30)
30.0
(9/30)
13.3
(430)
10.0
(130)

6.0

jni^j*
16.7
(oV30)
20.0
(600)
30.0
(9^0)
16.7
(5«))
20.0
(630)
20.0
(6/30)

18.3
(8/60)
      *Ezpo«uc by inhatrtion to VC in «r «t 10,000, 6000, 2500. 600. 250, and 50 ppm; 4 hr/day, S dayVwcek. for 30 weeks. Gotten
       uten, K, 11 week* old. Result* after 109 weeks (end of experiment).
      'Latency tint in vt*ki: Group 1.16.7; Group II. 27.2; Group III. 30.8; Group IV. 19.0; Group V. 22.5; Group VI, 35.3; Group VII.
                                    TABLE  VI-16
                                                  Eiperimeni BTXL*
ISmm/lOO
Group tad
1
60.00 of /kff
n
16.65 Of/Iff
Ul
8b38ag)kf
IV
Olhwcd
(eootnl)
Mim»«t«
XT
88.7
80.0

iao


13.7

BT LAS LA
85.0 2LZ 3.7
(17/80) (3/80)
17.5 ITS
(1£VW)
25.0


tg,5 . .

Aninula with tumors. %
Repe>
ELAS ELA toaM
2.5 2.5
(2/80) (2/80)
_ ,, ~

2.5 U! -
(2/80) (WO)

• • •

Nepkro- Keuro* Zvmbal
BL BL GLCa
2.5 - U
OBO) (WO)
3.7 . 2.5
(SflO) (240)
« • .


- - L2
(WO)
Skin
EpT
1.2
(WO)
^

_


L2
(WO)
Fore- Uara-
stomach miry
FalAc MT
Z5 5.0
(2'80) (4/80)
1.2 7.5
(WO) (6V80)
3.7
(3/80)

5.0
(490)
*Expoeure by taration (itomadi tube) of VC b olive oil at 50.00. 16. 65 and S.33 m«Vr hodv weMit. ana dailv. <-5 At v*/w*«k far .w
                                                                             ,
         SpnciM-Dawley rata. If and T. 13 week* old. Resulta aiUr 136 weeks (end of experiment).
Source:   Maltoni,  1981.

-------
                                           VI -17
                                       TABLE  VI -17
                                                     Experiment BT27.*

Group sad
I
LOnsAf
O
Otlmffef
III
0.08 mg>kt
IV
OSvtofl
(COBttflQ
am
2fT
24.7

12J

18.0


•16.0
•
uk
BT
2U

28.0

8U


2B.7

LAS
2.0
O/149)
0.7
0/148)
•


_

LA ELAS
0.7
(1/149)
0,7
(1/148)
• —


. \ .

Aninula -with tssen. *
Repa-
yH,/y tomss
a?

0.7
0/148)
• •


. .

%Tm»iti.Mii_ *• 	
J^CpATT^ {iVUfX^
BL BL
— —

•• —

• —
•

- .

Zymbal
GLCa
jj
(S/149)
_

•


0.7
(W50)
Sttn
EpT
^

0.7
(M48)
0.7
O/1SO)

_

For*.
ttomach
PaiAc
2.0

1J
(2/148)
0.7
(1/150)

L8
(2aso)
Msav
aarj
MT
8.0
(unw
2.7
(4n4B)
9.3
U4/1SO)

4.7
(7/1SO)
        *Cxpatun by incntioa (ftoruch tube) of VC in ofive ofl st LO, 0.3.0.03 mflyr body wticht, once daily, 4-5 diyVwcek, for 59 w««kx
       opniue-Otwicj nti, 1C and Ff 10 w«ek» old. SesuiU after 136 vetka (tad of uperiacnt).
                                      TABLE  VI-18
                                         Experiment BT12.*
               Tumors/100
 Cnwpand
                                                   Animals with tumors. %
               MT    BT    LAS   LA  ELAS
                               Fore*  Mam-
Hepa* Nephro- N«uro- Zymbal Skin stomach mary
       BL   BL   GLCa  EpT PafcAc  MT
1
4-2Smj x<
11
*JSttjx3
ni
**5mjx2
IV
g mt
V^
tamni;
^r-r 	
18J 25.0 - - '- - -

16.7 OJ - L9
Q/S3)
1L7 184 L8
OA6)
20.0 88.0 - LI
0/55)
&* M.7
• — m

_ — _

_, _ _

1.8
0/55)
_ _ _
1.8
(LW)
1.9
(1/53)
1.8
U/B6)
8.6
(2^5)
8.6
&SS)
1.8
(L/5£)
L9
(IAS)
5.3
(3/56)
8.6
(2^5)
••
^•we by imnperitoneal injection of VC. 4^5 me » olive oil (1 ml), 4. 8, 2 times, st two month intervals or once only.
"•Owley rats, II and F, 17 weeks old. RwaJts afUr 144 we*ks (end
 Source:    Maltoni,  1981.

-------
                                          VI-18
                                      TABLE VI-19
             Tumori/100
               aniznali
                                         Experiment BTU.*
                         Animals with tumors. «i
                                                           Fore-  Mam-
                          Heps- Nephro- Neuro- Zymbal  Skin  stomach mary
LAS   LA  ELAS  ELA  tanas  BL    BL   GLCa   £pT  Pa4Ac  JiT
                    174
                   S6.T
                                 LS
                                (1/75)
                    U
                   (1/75)
 L8
0/75)
 4.0
(V75)

 1.3
(1/75)
                 injection of VC, 4^5 mg, in div* oil (1 ol), lingie do*e. Spn
-------
                                                           TABLE VI-20



Tumors Presently correlated to VC Exposure (by inhalation) on Experimental Rodents
	(Haltoni, 1981)     	


                                                                              Seba-     Other            Fore-
                                        Lym-                                  ceous     cuta-            stomach
           Anglo-                        phcroas                                cuta      neous   Mam-    papillomas
           sarcomas   Tumors   Tumors   and                                   neous     epi-     mary    and
           of         oE       of       leu-    Hepa-   Angio-     Nephrb-    car-      thelial car-    acan-        Mela-
 Species   liver      brain    lung     kemias  tanas   sarcomas  blastemas  cinemas  tumors  cinemas thcmas       ncmas
        \    *
Rat     '4-           4-                         4-        +           +         *        (4-)      4         4-
Mouse   14-                    4-                         4-                              {+)      4        (+
Hamster 1    4-                             (-«-)              (+)                             (+)                •»•

-------
                            VI-20
     Maltoni (1981) concludes from the available data that



 lnyl chloride may produce tumors of different types at



 ifferent sites and that the incidence and relative distribution



  e greatly influenced by dose, age of the animal, and species



    strain of animal used.





     A recently completed study by Peron et al. (1981) examined



    oral toxicity of vinyl chloride in Wistar rats.  This



      was carried out over the lifespan of the rats,  and
                   •


 °nsisted of incorporating polyvinyl chloride powder containing



  hi9h content of vinyl chloride monomer in the diet,  or using



  8tric intubation of a 10% vinyl chloride monomer in soya-



 eari oil.   The vinyl chloride monomer doses (actual exposures)



Were 0,  1.7,  5.0  and i4.i.mg/kg bw.through the diet or 300



 9/kg Dw by gastric intubation.  The results showed that rats



**Poaed to  vinyl  chloride monomer at levels of 5.0 mg/kg


W A
  a*y or more  demonstrated hepatic angiosarcomas,  pulmonary



  Sioaarcomas,  and at the higher levels,  a few primary extra-

V

 P*tic  abdominal  angiosarcomas.   At the  lowest exposure



 *Vft1  of  1.7 mg vinyl chloride monomer/kg bw/day,  liver-cell
 Ult>0rB and an increased  incidence  of  foci  of  cellular alteration



    noted.  (Tables VI-21 and VI-22).

-------
TABLE VI-2I- Type and incidence of treatment-related histqpathological changes in the liver of rats exposed
             orally to VCM
	(Feron et al. , 1981)	

                                                                 Incidence of change
Males
Type of Treatment group
change* (mg VCM/kg/day) . . .
0
1.7
5.0
14.1
300t
0
Females
1.7
5.0
14.1
300t
Animals killed after 26 wk
\ No.
Clear-cell foci
of rats examined...

10
0
§
—
_.
—
\ Animals killed -after
i
i
1 No.
Clear-cell foci
Basophilic focd
Bosinophilic foci
Neoplastic nodule
of rats examined...




Hepatocellular carcinoma
Cystic proliferation

No.
Clear-cell foci
of bile ducts
Animals
of rates examined.

Basophilic: foci
Eosinophilic foci
Necplastic: nodule
Hepatocellular cardnora
Angiosarccna
, 9
1
0
0
0
0
0
found
..55
0
8
3
0
0
0
^Ml»
—
	
	
	
	
	
dead or
58
9**
18
23***
1
1
0
- -
—
—
—
—
—
—
killed
56
16***
21*
27***
7**
2
6*
10
1
52 wk
10
8**
0
2
1
1
0
9
1 .

9
0
0
0
0
0
0
in extremis
59
21***
22**
33***
23***
8**
27***
55
9
12
11
3
1
27
10
*~ 0

9
0
0
0
0
0
0
—
— -

--..i
—
— .
—
—
—
—
_
—

__
—
—
— —
—
—
— —
10
5**

'10
a**
4
5**
2
1
4*
10
2

8
0
1
0
0
0
0
or terminally
57
4
0
8
2
0
0
58
24***
33***
35***
26**
4
0
59
22***
17
20*
39***
19**
2
57
36***
28***
29***
44***
29***
9**
54
10
19
6
2
0
29

-------
TABLE VI-21  (Continued)
                                                         VI-22
Proliferation of atypical
sinusoidal cells only
Extensive necrosis
Cysts
Liver-cell polymorphism
Centrilobular degeneration
Focal haenatcpoiesis

2
4
2
4
0
0

0
4
3
16*
0
1

4
8
4
28***
0
0

7
23***
16***
42***
1
10**

6
21
3
36
1
8

4
5
9
34
1
1

6
6
30***
51*
2
3

3
19***
41***
38
3
1

4
27***
49***
41
1
6

7
24
3
41
18
12
 'Specific hepatocellular lesions were classified according to Squire & Levitt  (1975).
 VThe figures of this group were not evaluated statistically because no corresponding control group was included
    in the study*
 §Not examined.
  Hie initial number of animals was 60/sex/group.  A nuntoer of rats could not be examined because of cannibalism or
    advanced autolysis.
 Values narked with asteriks differ significantly from those of the controls according to the chi-square tests
    *P
-------
TABLE VT-22- Site, type and incidence of tumours in organs other than the liver* in rats exposed orally to VCM for
             over 2-5 yr	(Feron et al., 1991)
Incidence of tumours
Site and Treatment group
type of tumour (rag VCM/kg/day) . . .
Effective no. of rats**.
No. of rats with primary tumours. . .
Lungs
Angiosarccna
Adencnu
Zymbal glands
Squamouu-cell cardncma
Adenomi
Abdomen
Mesothelioma
Angioaarcoma
\Fxbaro3aroana
Osteosarccna
Isaroona
Reticulum-cell sarcoma
'Schwann-cell tumour '
Unclassified
Spleen
Haemangioendotheliosarccma
Lymphcearccma
Nose
Squanous-cell cardncma
Brain
Granular-cell royoblastcma
Oligoctendrcglicma
Plexus papillcma
Glial-cell tumour
Ependyroona
Mesodermal tumour
Pancreas
Adenocardnoma
Thorax
Mesothelioma
Thyroid
Parafollicular-cell aderaona
Parafollicular-cell cardncma
Follieular-cell adenoma

0
55
38

0
0

0
0

3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
0

0

1
1
0
0
0
0

0

1

4
1
0

1.7
58
50

0
0

0
0

1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0

1
0

0

1
0
0
0
0
0

0

0

12*
0
0
Males
5.0
56
49

4*
0

2
0

7
0
0
0
3
0
0
0

0
0

0

0
0
0
2
0
1

0

o

10
1
0
Females
14.1
59
52
.
19***
0.. -

0 -
0 '

8
0
3
"0
1
0
0
0

0
0

1

0
0
0
0
1
0

0

0

3
0
1
300t
55
44

19
1

1
0

1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0

0
0

0

0
0
0
1
0
0

0

0

3
0
0
0
57
54

0
0

0
0

1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2

0
0

0

0
0
0
0
0
0

1

0

7
0
1
1.7
58
56

0
0

0
0

6*
0
2
0
0
0
1
0

0
0

0

1
0
1
0
0
0

2

0

10
0
0
5.0
59
55

1
0

0
0

3
0
0
0
1
0
0
0

0
0

0

0
0
0
0
0
0

1

0

3
0
0
14.1
57
57

5*
0

0
0

3
2
0
1
0
0
0
0

0
0

0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0

0

2
0
1
300*
54
47

23
0

1
1

0
1.
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
1

0

0
0
0
0
0
0

0

0

0
0
0

-------
TABLE VI-22 (continued)
Incidence
Site and
type of Treatment group
tumour (ing VCM/kg/day)
Adrenals
Cortical adenoma
Etiaeochronocytcna
Pituitary
Adenona
Carcinoma
Blood
Leukemia
Heart
Endocardia! disease'
Haerangioendotheliosarocma
Kidneys
Nephroblastoma
Clear-cell tumour
LipomatouEi tumour
Unclassified epithelial tumour
Thymus
Fibrosarocna
Reticulum-cell sarcoma
Mesenteric lymph nodes
Reticulumr-cell sarcona
Skin
Squamous-cell carcinona
Subcutis
Fibroma.
Fribrosarccma
Mesenchyiml tumour
Skeletal muscle
RhabdomycHarcana

0

18
11

12
1

1

2
1

1
0
0
0

0
0

0

2

2
0
0

0

1.7

25
21

25**
0

0

0
0

0
0
0
0

1
0

0

3

1
1
0

0
Males
5.0

17
8

6
1

1

2
0

0
0
1
0

0
0

0

3

1
1
0

0
of Tumours
Females
14.1

10
4

2**
0

1

2
0

1
0
0
0

0
0

0

1

1
0
0

1
300t

9
6

0
0

3

1
0

0
0
0
o

0
1

1

0

1
0
0

1
0

26
2

14
3

1

1
0

O
0
0
1

0
0

0

0

3
1
1

1
1.7

30
1
• . •
16
Of

2

0
Q-

0
0
0
0

0
1

0

0

3
1
0

0
5.0

20
2

10
2

1

0
0

0
0
0
0

0
1

0

0

1
0
0

0
14.1

17
O

5*
O

0

0
0

0
1
0
0

0
0

0

1

0
0
0

0
300t

14
2

3
0

1

1
0

0
0
0
0 .

0
0

0

0

0
0
0

0

-------
TABLE VI-22 (continued)
Incidence
Site and
type of Treatment group
tumour (rag VCM/kg/day)
Skull
Osteoma
Mesenchyroal tumour
Ear region
Adenocarclnom of unknown origin
Urinary bladder
Unclassified epithelial tumour
Preputial glands
Squanous-cell carcdnona
Mammary glands
1 Adenoma
\ Fibroadencna
' Adenocarcinona
'.Anaplastic carcinona
Testes
'Interstitial-cell tumour
Uterus
Adenocarcincma
of Tumours
Males
0

1
0

0

0

0

0
0
0
0

3


1.7 5.0

0 0
0 0

0 1

0 1

0 1

0 0
0 0
1 0
0 0

0 0


14.1

0
0

0

0

0

0
0
2
-o

1


3oot

0
0

0

0

0

0
0
0
0

1


Malignant f ibroadenomatous tunour
Leicmycma
Cervix
Mesenchynal type of tunour
Adenocarcinona
Ovaries
Theca-cell tumour
























0

0
0

0

0

0

0
21
3
0



6
0
0

2
0

0
Females
1.7

0
1

0

0

0

0
25
£
0



3
1
0

0
1

0
; 	 ; — r-
5.0

0
0

0

0

0

0
12**
4
1



1
0
1

1
0

1
14.1

0
0

0

0

0

2
4**
7
0



1
0
0

0
0

0
300t

0
0

0

0

0

0
7
7
0



0
0
0

0
0

0
    one Kupffer-cell sarcoma,  three reticulum-cell sarcomas, two flbrcsaroomas, one haenangioendothelioma and one
    mesenchynel tumour.

      figurtss for this group were not evaluated statistically, because no corresponding control group was included
    in the study.

 §In several, cases the neoplastic character of the lesion was doubtful.

  Values narked with asteriks differ significantly from those of the controls according to the chi-square test:
   *P<0.05; **P<0.01j ***P<0.001.

-------
                          VI-26
    Feron et al.  (1981)  concluded that vinyl chloride monomer



is a carcinogen when administered  by the oral route,  and that



the tumor response seems  to  shift  from the exclusive  development



of angiosarcomas at very  high  levels to the exclusive induction



of hepatocellular  tumors  at  low levels of exposure.   Feron et



al. have also initiated a similar  lifespan oral carcinogenicity



study with vinyl chloride in rats,  using three different dose



levels (0.017, 0.1*7 and 1.7  mg'vinyl chloride monomer/Teg bw



day) and two control groups.  This study is currently in



progress and the results  are not yet available.

-------
VII.  HUMAN HEALTH EFFECTS

      A.  Non-Carcinogenic Effects

      Vinyl chloride can produce a number of pathological
 consequences in humans in addition to its carcinogenic effect.
 These effects can be from acute or chronic exposure to vinyl
 chloride.  Unfortunately, data regarding dose-response relation-
 ships in humans ajre very scarce because of the virtual absence
 of air measurements of vinyl chloride in the work environment
 of vinyl chloride manufacturing and polymerization plants
 before 1975  (Mancuso, 1975).  According to OSHA (39 FR 12342,
 April 5, 1974), several facilities revealed vinyl chloride
 concentrations for some job classifications as high as 229
 ppra.  Rowe  (1975) commented that before I960, a few jobs
 resulted in  exposures in the range of 100 to 385 ppm, but
 these measurements /could be high because the method of quanti-
 fication measured total halogens rather than vinyl chloride
 alone.  Nicholson et al. (1975) reported that vinyl chloride
 in polymerization reactors may often have exceeded 1000 ppm
 and occasionally may have approached 10,000 ppm before OSHA
 standards were instituted.  At these levels, workers experi-
 enced dizziness, headaches and/or euphoria during work periods.

      Several instances of acute exposure have occurred in
   vinyl Chloride plants.  Deaths of two Canadian workers were

-------
                          VI1-2
reported by Danziger in 1960 following acute exposures to vinyl
chloride gas.  At autopsy, there was congestion of the liver,
spleen and kidneys. In another study reported by Suciu et al.
M975), exposure of workers to high concentrations of vinyl
chloride produced euphoria, intoxication and narcosis.  In
this study, the investigators found a dose-response relationship
for acute and subacute cases of "occupational disease" from
              ••               x
air concentrations ranging from 2,298 mg/m3 (about 900 ppm)
to about 100 mg/m3 (about 40 ppm).

     In another investigation, Spirtas et al. (1975) conducted
a survey of 200 vinyl chloride workers and 89 rubber plant
workers (controls) where information was sought on the frequency
of eight symptoms, including dizziness, loss of consciousness,
headaches, etc.  The vinyl chloride workers were categorized
into low and high exposure groups.  Because the exposure
limits had been markedly decreased a short time before the
survey, the high exposure group consisted of workers who
were exposed to vinyl chloride concentrations of over 200
ppm before the standard, and 20-30 ppm subsequently.  The
low exposure group consisted of workers who were exposed to
0-50 ppm before the standard and 0-10 ppm subsequent to it.
Examination of the differences among the three groups indicated
a statistically significant dose-response relationship for
five of the eight symptoms (i.e., frequency of symptoms in the
high exposure group < low exposure group < rubber workers), and

-------
                           VI1-3
 a similar but non-significant trend in two of the remaining
 symptom categories.  Thus there appears to be a dose-response
 relationship between certain acute symptoms (predominantly
 Qeurological) and level of vinyl chloride exposure.  The data
 also suggest that vinyl chloride levels below 50 ppm can
 produce health effects.

      The earliest reports of hepatotoxicity in vinyl chloride
 workers were noted by Tribukh vet al.  (1949);  however, the
 «ffects were attributed to plasticizers added in the manufac-
 turing  process.   The observed concentrations  of vinyl chloride
 ranged  from 1 to 470 ppm.   Since that time, impaired liver
 function has  been noted by other investigators (Marstellar et
 £i- 1  1975;  Lilis et a]L. ,  1975;  Popper and Thomas,  1975;
      r,  1975).
     Another effect  from  chronic  vinyl  chloride  exposure  is
a condition known as acroosteolysis, which  involves bone
lesions in the distal phalanges of  the  hands  and feet  and
8cleroderma-like skin lesions.  Also associated  with this
c°ndition are Raynaud's syndrome, pseudoclubbing of fingers,
    numerous other symptoms.  Many  cases of acroosteolysis
     been reported and characterized and most involve  autoclave
w°rkers in vinyl chloride plants  (Wilson et al. ,  1967; Dinman
S£ Si-, 1971; Harris and Adams, 1967; Lilis et al. , 1975).

-------
                          VI1-4
     Other long-term effects induce disturbances of the
central nervous system, pulmonary insufficiency, cardiovascular
manifestations, and several gastrointestinal symptoms (Miller
et al., 1975; Suciu et al., 1975).  These and other vinyl
chloride-induced health effects are reviewed in the New York
Academy of Sciences report "Toxicity of Vinyl Chloride-Polyvinyl
Chloride" (Selikoff and Hammond, 1975).

     Reproductive effects have also been noted.  According to
a study by Infante (Infante, 1976; Infante et al^,  1976a),
the  incidence of birth defects for three small communities
in Ohio in which vinyl chloride polymerization plants are
located were significantly higher (P<0.001) than those in
                                *
either the counties in which these communities are located
or the State of Ohio in general.  Significant excesses were
observed for clubfoot and defects of the central nervous
                   /
system, upper alimentary tract, and genital organs.  A follow-
up study by Edmonds et al. (1975) identified a moderate increase
in central nervous system malformations, but no association
could  be found with vinyl chloride exposure.  In another
epidemiologic study by Infante et al.  (1976b), there was a
significant excess fetal loss  (P<0.05) in wives whose husbands
were vinyl chloride polymerization workers compared to controls
(wives of polyvinyl chloride fabrication and rubber workers).
The  Infante studies suggest an association between vinyl

-------
                          VI1-5




chloride and birth defects/fetal loss, but they are not yet


supported by animal data.



     Cytogenic studies have also been conducted.  Picciano et


al. (1977) reported no statistically significant differences


in chromatid and chromosomal aberrations or proportion of


abnormal cells, in a group of 209 vinyl chloride exposed


workers.  These workers were exposed for periods ranging from

              "  -'   '         \
1 to 332 months to time-weighted average (TWA) levels of vinyl


chloride ranging from 0.3 to 15.2 ppm.  Killian et al. (1975)


have also reported a lack of evidence for excess chromosome


breakage in a population of vinyl chloride exposed workers.


In contrast, Ducatman et al. (1975) and Purchase et al. (1975)


have reported increased incidence of chromosomal breakage


among vinyl chloride exposed workers.



     Heath et al. ('1977) examined cytogenic effects in three


groups of industrial workers:  PVC polymerization workers


(presumed high exposure), PVC processing workers  (presumed


low exposure) and rubber and tire manufacture workers  (presumed


negligible exposure).  Actual vinyl chloride levels were not


measured.  Chromosome breakage in all three groups was signi-


ficantly greater than in non-industrial controls, and overall


breakage levels were simlar in all three groups.  The authors


concluded that other agents in addition to vinyl  chloride


may cause cytogenic damage in workers employed  in the  rubber/


plastics industry.

-------
                           VI1-6
     B.  Carcinogenic Effects
         The primary effect associated with vinyl chloride
exposure in man is an increased risk of cancer in several
organ systems including angiosarcoma of the liver.  Human
data have been obtained primarily from occupational exposure
of workers to vinyl chloride.

     Epidemiologic studies of vinyl chloride exposed workers
have focused on cases of angiosarcoma of the liver, a type of
cancer which occurs infrequently in the general population,
about 25-30 cases per year in the United States (Heath et al.,
1975).  Because of its rare occurrence, it is possible to
infer a causal relationship between exposure to vinyl chloride
and the development of this tumor.  The epidemiologic evidence
linking vinyl chloride to other types of cancers is more
tenuous.
     The first study associating vinyl chloride exposure in
humans with cancer was conducted by Creech and Johnson, 1974.
Three cases of angiosarcoma in workers at a polymerization
plant in Louisville, Kentucky, were described.  The remaining
portion of this section describes some of the epidemiologic
studies linking vinyl chloride with angiosarcoma and other
types of cancer.

-------
                       VI1-7







 Tabershaw and Gaffey  (1974) conducted a mortality study



 ayl  chloride workers.  Mortality calculations included



 those workers who could be traced,  i.e.,  7,128 of 8,384



 rs.  These  individuals were from 33 different facilities



 11 had been exposed to vinyl  chloride for at least 1



  The mean  employment duration for  the group of workers



  study was  80 months.  Among  the workers,  there were



 ith  exposures of 20 years, or  longer and 1,640 exposed



  more years.





 Compared to the general male  U.S. population, the overall



 lity rate among vinyl chloride workers was found to be



 , i.e.,  75  percent of the expected  rate.   The favorable



 11 mortality rate is  a phenomenon commonly observed in



Ing populations.  Standarized  mortality ratios (the



  of  the  number of observed deaths in the study population



ne number of deaths expected in a comparable population)



 alignant neoplasms increased  with increasing exposure



1 and/or  longer duration.  In  the group identified as the



 exposure group, there were increases in liver cancer



narily angiosarcoma),  respiratory system cancers,  and



n cancers.   These differences  were not statistically



ificant.





 Dow  Chemical Co.  (Holder, 1974) conducted a mortality study



94 workers in a single plant exposed to vinyl chloride

-------
                          VII-10





     Ott et al. (1975) have re-examined much of the mortality


data reported by Tabershaw and Gaffey (1974) and have included


more clearly defined exposure levels and .follow-up of former


company employees.  The basic findings remain unchanged; no


increase over expected in malignant neoplasms was found in


the low exposure group (TWA from 10 to 100 ppm) and an increase


in deaths due to malignant neoplasms was observed in the high


exposure group.(TWA of greater than 200 ppm).
                 .•            \



     Chiazze et al.(1977) have reported a cross-sectional


mortality study of 4,341 employees from 17 PVC plants who died


between 1964 and 1973.  No angiosarcoma deaths were identified.


Total cancer deaths increased in white employees (especially


due to cancer of the digestive sy-tem).  In white women


employees, deaths from cancer of the breast and urinary organs


were greater than expected.

                   /

     In contrast, in a mortality study of 7,000 British


workers exposed to vinyl chloride between 1940 and 1974, the


investigators found no evidence of increased cancer mortality


other than from liver cancer.  In this study, four cases of


malignant liver tumor were diagnosed, and two of these were


confirmed to be angiosarcoma.  Both cases were in men exposed


to high levels of vinyl chloride (Pox and Collier, 1977).

-------
                          VII-11







     In addition, Byren et al.  (197-6) traced 750 of 771



Swedish vinyl chloride plant workers.  A four- to five-



fold increase over expected in  pancreas and liver tumors was



found, and two cases were diagnosed as angiosarcoraa.  The



numbers of other tumors did not deviate significantly from



expected.



                             v

     Ten cases of. hepatic angiosarcoma have been found

              •'•

among the relatively small work force employed at a vinyl



chloride polymerization plant in Quebec.  This is the largest



number of cases to be diagnosed in a single plant (Makk et



al.i 1976).  As a result, Delorme and Theriault (1978) have



retrieved more detailed information on these employees.  The



authors suggest that the cases of hepatic angiosarcoma appear



to be associated with high vinyl chloride exposure levels and



overtime work hours.  No correlation was found between occurrence

                   /

of this tumor and alcohol consumption or cigarette smoking.





     In workers engaged in the polymerization of vinyl chloride



who were studied by Popper and Thomas  (1975), the characteristic



hepatic fibrosis was present in all  cases of angiosarcoma.
                                                    *


Although the relation of fibrotic lesions to the development



of angiosarcomas  requires further study, a transition  from



the fibrotic stage to angiosarcoma is  suggested by the  focal



proliferation of  the sinusoidal lining cells and of the

-------
                           VII-12

hepatocytes that are seen in the fibrotic stage but which
becomes even more pronounced in the initial stages of angio-
sarcoma development.  These findings suggest that the
fibrotic lesions without angiosarcomas, frequently observed
in workers exposed to vinyl chloride (Lilis et al., 1975),
might be the prestage of developing neoplastic lesions.
The diagnosis of the fibrotic lesions in these workers may
imply a longer;, latency period for tumor initiation based
on a lower exposure level.  The series of changes observed
in the liver appear to represent a multi-centric development
of angiosarcoma and are similar to the changes induced by
Thorotrast and inorganic arsenicals (Berk et al., 1976).
    In the most recent update of the NIOSH register (Spirtas
and Kaminaski, 1978) a total of 64 cases of hepatic angio-
sarcoma have been identified worldwide among vinyl chloride
exposed industrial 'workers.  A listing of all documented
cases by country is presented in Table VII-1.  The number
of cases per year is depicted in Figure VII-1.  Of the 64
cases, 23 have been reported in the United States.  The
authors reported that both the age at diagnosis and the
latency period for cancer induction appear to be increasing.
They suggest three explanations for these phenomena:
(1) early cases may have heavier exposures;  (2) the initial
cases represented more biologically susceptible individuals;

-------
                            VI1-13

and (3) random fluctuation.  If the trend of increased age
at diagnosis and the longer latent period for hepatic
angiosarcoma induction are indeed related- to lower levels of
occupational exposure, then the latent period for cancer
induction as a result of these low levels of exposure may be
longer than previously anticipated, i.e., it would be many
years before the ultimate outcome of these exposures will be
known.

     It has been hypothesized that inhalation of low levels
of vinyl chloride by the general public in the vicinity of
vinyl chloride/PVC manufacturing plants could be responsible
for an increased risk of angiosarcoma of the liver development.
Brady et al. (1977) examined annual rates of hepatic angic—
sarcoma from 1970 through 1975 in residents of the State of
New York (excluding New York City).  Exposures to arsenic,
                   /
vinyl chloride, or thorium dioxide were suggested to be
significant factors in the etiology of these tumors.  Direct
exposure to these agents could not be demonstrated in 19 of
the 26 study cases.  Five of the 19 patients lived closer to
vinyl chloride plants than did their matched controls.  This
may lend some support to the idea that "indirect modes of
exposure, not specifically related to occupation, might be
insportant in the etiology of this disorder" (Brady et al.,
1971).

-------
                           VI1-14





     The International Agency for Research on Cancer (1979)



examined the available data on humans and concluded that ex-



posure to vinyl chloride results in an increased carcinogenic



risk to humans.  The organ systems most likely to be affected



were the liver, brain, lung, and hemato and lymphopoietic



systems.

-------
Anglosarcona of the lAver in Vinyl Chloride/PSJC Vtorker
             (Spirtaa an3 Kamlnaki,  1978)
Country
Belgium
Canada
Canada
Canada
Canada
Canada
Canada
Canada
Canada
Canada
Canada
Czechoslovakia
Czedhos lovakia
Fed Rep Germany
Fed Rep Germany
Fed Rep Germany
Fed Rep Germany
Fed Rep Germany
Fed Rep Garmany
Fed Rep Germany
Fed Rep Germany
Fed Rep Germany
France
France
France
France
France
France
France
vrance
reat Britain
reat Britain
Case
No.
01
01*
02*
03*
04*
05*
06*
07*
08
09
10
01*
02*
01*
02*
04
05*
07*
08*
09*
10*
11*
01*
02
03*
04*
05*
06*
07
08*
01*
03
Birth
Date
OO-OO-OO
12-15-13
03-O6-14
08-26-19
04-05-19
05-07-11
12-15-19
11-09-19
05-13-20
07-19-21
05-16-15
00-OO-28
00-OO-26
06-04-30
07-26-31
09-O4-30
O1-O1-32
09-29-26
10-19-17
12-13-34
07-25-29
12-29-36
04-15-24
06-03-11
00-00-19
01-27-27
01-29-38
04-14-34
00-00-27
04-O1-34
04-20-01
06-O2-37
1st VC
of PVC
Exposure
00-00-00
00-OO-44
00-OO-43"
00-00-41
00-00-45
00-OO-44
00-OO-47
00-00-46
00-00-61
00-00-46
00-00-53
00-00-57
00-00-51
10-01-56
10-14-57
04-16-57
12-16-62
04-15-54
04-19-54
12-02-59
10-10-55
01-02-61
01-00-46
07-O6-59
00-00-46
1O-19-49
OO-00-65
00-OO-58
07-01-50
05-23-57
00-00-44
02-OO-66
Diagnosis of
Angiosarcona
00-00-00
00-00-55
00-00-57
00-OO-62
00-00-67
00-OO-68
00-00-71
00-00-72
00-00-73
00-00-74
00-00-76
00-00-73
00-OO-66
09^19-68
09-25-70
00-00-74
00-00-75
00-00-75
00-00-75
06-16-76
06-28-77
00-00-77
02-18-67
01-08-75
01-OO-75
01-04-76
04-00-76
09-00-76
07-00-76
12-03-76
12-00-72
12-OO-74
Age at
Diagnosis
00
41
43
42
48
57
51
53
53
53
61
46
40
38
39
44
43
49
58
42
47
41
43
63
55
49
38
42
49
42
71
37
Years from
1st Exposure
to Diagnosis
00
11
14
21
22
24
24
26
12
28
23
16
15
12
13
17
13
21
22
17
22
16
21
15
29
26
11
18
26
19
28
09
Total
Years of
Exposure
00
11
14
20
22
05
23
25
05
26
14
16
15
12
12
17
12
12
21
15
22
10
19
12
29
26
10
17
23
19
22
04
Date
of
Death
06-29-76
09-02-55
12-21-55
03-22-62
01-21-68
07-05-68
04-10-71
12-24-72
06-12-73
09-04-74
04-00-77
00-00-74
00-OO-66
01-25-69
12-14-71
11-25-74
01-09-75
11-13-75
12-25-75
Alive
06-28-77
03-07-77
02-19-67
01-24-75
06-29-75
01-04-76
05-13-76
09-12-76
07-O2-76
01-30-77
12-00-72
12-24-74

-------
Country
Italy
Italy
Japan
Norway
Sweden
Sweden
Sweden
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S. A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
U.S.A.
Yugoslavia
Yugoslavia
Case
No.
02*
03*
01
01*
01*
03*
04*
01*
02*
03*
04*
05*
06*
07*
08*
09*
10*
11*
12*
13*
16*
17*
18*
19*
20*
21*
22*
23*
24*
25*
01*
02*
Birth of PVC
Date Exposure
11-13-29
03-14-20
08-01-22
12-23-15
06-23-27
06-10-10
11-16-14
10-17-23
08-19-33
05-25-15
01-15-24
01-25-12
11-23-28
05-03-22
05-O6-20
11-08-31
08-16-13
05-27-O9
11-17-lfl
12-01-21
11-04-27
05-06-31
04-22-28
00-00-15
08-31-17
09-02-09
10-02-23
00-00-23
05-07-17
08-O7-10
04-O5-14
11-15-31
00-00-57
00-00-53
04-00-53
03-OO-50
08-14-51
05-00-47
OO-00-46
12-09-48
11-15-55
11-28-45
07-06-52
06-19-^14
01-17-62
08-27-44
10-07-46
05-28-45
Q6-12-51
10-14-46
09-13-49
12-11-42
05-08-50
06-23-55
09-15-54
00-00-43
00-00-55
12-00-46
07-11-47
09-00-58
00-00-39
02-00-47
00-OO-53
00-00-50
Diagnosis of
Angiosarcora
12-13-72
07-10-75
08-21-74
12-20-71
08-00-74
03-19-76
05-12-77
03-O3-73
05-OO-70
12-19-73
08-19-67
04-O9-64
02-00-74
00-00-68
08-OO-61
03-01-74
05-00-68
03-OO-70
05-02-69
05-OO-74
00-OO-69
10-11-74
00-OO-75
06-19-75
01-30-76
00-00-77
01-00-76
04-06-73
05-27-77
03-10-77
04-08-73
07-12-73
at
Diagnosis
43
55
52
56
43
65
62
49
37
58
43
52
46
45
41
43
55
61
50
52
41
43
46
60
58
67
52
50
60
67
59
42
1st Exposure
to Diagnosis
15
22
22
22
19
29
31
24
14
28
15
20
12
24
15
29
17
23
20
32
19
19
21
32
21
30
29
15
38
30
20
23
Years of
Exposure
06
21
22
21
18
21
31
21
13
28
15
20
12
17
15
24
17
23
19
26
04
19
11
22
18
21
28
14
26
20
20
18
of
Death
12-00-72
07-10-75
1O-24-75
01-O4-72
10-20-70
03-19-76
05-12-77
03-03-73
09-28-71
12-19-73
01-07-68
04-09-64
07-24-75
03-23-68
08-29-61
03-00-75
05-10-68
03-16-70
05-O2-69
07-04-74
03-27-69
Alive
11-02-75
04-06-76
01-30-77
01-O2-77
12-04-76
04-06-73
05-27-77
03-10-77
04-08-73
07-12-73
Total Reported
Cases
64

-------
                            VII-17
                         Figure VII-1


Number of cases of vinyl chloride/PVC  related angiosarcomas
reported to NIOSH by year  of  diagnosis (representing only 63
of the 64 cases known to NIOSH since information on diagnosis
is missing for one case)  (Spirtas  and  Kaminski, 1978).
                         1-50     I'S
                             TCAR OF DIAGNOSIS
ho    ITS

-------
 VIII.   MECHANISMS OF TOXICITY
        The mechanisms  of  non-carcinogenic  injury of vinyl
 chloride  are  not Tcnown.   It  is theorized that the toxicity of
 this compound is attributable to its enzymatic oxidation to
 reactive  polar metabolites,  possibly chloroethylene oxide or
 chloroacetaldehyde  (see Pharmacokinetics section).

     Ward et  al. (1976) hypothesized that  an inununological
 mechanism is  responsible  for the non-carcinogenic pathological
 effects of vinyl chloride exposure.  According to this model/
 a metabolite  of vinyl  chloride binds to plasma protein,
producing an  antibody  response.  The antigen and resulting
immunoglobulin interact to produce a soluble complex which
causes  vascular occlusion, platelet aggregation, and other
adverse effects which  explain the observed symptoms of the
 disease.   An  investigation of workers with "vinyl chloride
 disease"  showed the presence of circulating immune complexes
 in  19 of  28 patients.  Abnormalities were also detected in
 some workers'  exposed to vinyl chloride who had few or no overt
 clinical  signs.

     Over the past several decades, scientists have conducted
 ft great deal  of research in an effort to establish the
 nechanism(s)  by which  chemical substances exert their
 carcinogenicity.  The  somatic cell mutation theory of
carcinogenicity suggests that for a carcinogenic response to
occur,  an irreversible change must occur in the cell which

-------
                             VIII-2

         in proliferation of a neoplasm.  This change reflects
 4 wutational event in the DNA of that cell,  suggesting that
 ^e chemical carcinogen must interact directly with or
 ot*erwise  alter the DNA to intiate the change.  In recent years,
 how«~
  ^ever, some substances have been shown to  be carcinogenic,
  ut by mechanisms  in which there apparently  is no direct
  n*eraction  with or alteration of the DNA of the cell  by  the
   ^stance.   Presumably,  these compounds are  not capable of
   i-tiating the  alteration of  a normal cell to a neoplastic one,
 ut  can facilitate  expression of  a neoplastic response in
 Ut«
       cells.  On the basis of these purported differences in
  c«anisras, carcinogens now are often classified into two broad
  te9ories:  genotoxic and epigenetic or nongenotoxic.

     The mechanisms by which a compound exerts its carcinogenicity
       can be determined by the chronic testing of whole
        such as is done in the NTP bioassay.  Thus, a large
  tober of short-term in vitro and in vivo assay systems have
be
   n Developed for the purpose of elucidating mechanisms.
Sin
  nce most of the in vitro testing systems measure mutational
  entsr  and many  carcinogens  are mutagens,  it is suggested
tha*
  *<-  positive results in  certain of these test sytems indicate
  ^otox         The  decision as  to whether a substance is
 6t*otoxic may be made qualitatively on the basis of several
          1) a reliable, positive  demonstration of genotoxicity
n Appropriate prokaryotic and  eulcaryotic  systems in vitro y

-------
                             VIII-3

    studies on binding to DNA and 3) evidence of biochemical
    biologic consequences of DNA damage (Weisburger and
 ^Uians,  1981).
      No single test system appears capable .of detecting all
   rcinogens that  are genotoxic.   Therefore,  a number  of
  Dentists have proposed testing batteries such  that  results
  r°m  each  test within the battery when evaluated as a whole,
   il  allow one to make a conclusion about  the mechanism of
 ar°inogenicity of  a  particular ^compound.  Vinyl chloride has
 n               ''   *
 °* been systematically studied  in any specific  battery of
  stsf but has been evaluated in  a  number  of  test systems
  *t have been proposed  for inclusion  in one  or more batteries.
  "le Vlli-i summarizes  some of the mutagenicity studies on vinyl
  *oride which have demonstrated the chemical to have genotoxic
  t
         .   The studies have been divided according to the
      criteria for genotoxicity (Weisburger and Williams,
 98 1)  outlined above.
                    /
    When considering all of the data on vinyl chloride, it
is              '
  Probable  that vinyl chloride exerts its  carcinogenicity
 r°ugh genotoxic mechanisms.

-------
                               VIII-4
TABLE VIII-1 - Results of Vinyl Chloride Mutagenicdty Studies
A.  Assay system
                              Results
In Vitro prdkaryotic and eukaryotic systems

Metabolically activated           +
Salmonella tyghiirurium
system lAraes/
Escherichia coli KL2              +
bioauxotrophic  strain

Yeast

Germ cells of Drosochilia        +

Chinese hamster V79 cells        +

B.  DNA Binding Studies

Mouse tissues (brain, lung,       +
 liver, kidney,  spleen,       (Irreversible
pancreas and testes)  in       binding to
vitro                         and DNA)
 Rat liver microscnes,
 reconstituted cytochrcnB
 P-450 systems and isolated
 hepatocytes

 Rat liver microscnes with
 NADPH
                             (Irreversible
                              binding to
                              protein and DNA)
                             (Alkylation
                              of FNA)
       References



Bartsch et al. , 1975
McCann et al. , 1975
Elrore et al, 1976
Rannug et al, 1974
Garro et al. 1976

Greimetal., 1975


Loprieno et al. 1976, 1977

Verburgt and Vogel, 1977

Huberoan et al. , 1975



Bergman, 1982




Guengerich et al. ,  1981
                                                    and Holt,  1977
 C.  Biochemical or biologic consequences of DNA damage
Bone marrow cells of
rats (in vivo)
 Bone marrow cells of
 Chinese hamsters  (in vivo)
                              (Q
                               damage)
 Anderson and Richardson,
 1976
                                               Basler and Rohrborn,  1980
                               aberrations and
                               sister-chrcnatid-
                               exchanges)
Cultured peripheral lympho-
cytes in humans  (vinyl       (Chronosomal
                                                Purchase et al. , 1978
  chloride exposed workers)     abnormalities)   Purchase et al. , 1975
                                                Ducatman et al., 1975

-------
                                 IX-1
 IX.   RISK ASSESSMENT

      Because  vinyl  chloride  rarely occurs  in nature,  virtually
 all  of  the compound found in the aquatic environment  appears
 to be in  discharge  water from vinyl chloride production and
.polymerization plants,  and leachates  from  disposal  sites.  Up
 to 20 ppm has been  found in  samples of  discharge  water (U.S.
 EPA,  1974).  Because of its  low solubility in water and high
 volatility, vinyl chloride would not  be expected  to persist
              ,:  ..  ' •         v
 in the  aquatic environment (Hill e_t aJL., 1976).   It nevertheless
 has  been  detected in the potable water  of  several cities and
 towns in  at least two national surveys  (U.S. EPA, 1975a and  1977).

 Interactions  of Vinyl  Chloride with other  Chemicals
      Vinyl Chloride has been demonstrated  to have interactions
 with other chemicals.   Radike e_t al.  (1981)  investigated the  effect
 of ingested ethanol on the induction  of liver tumors  in rats.  Male
 Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to 600 ppm vinyl chloride by inha-
 lation, 4 hours/day, 5 days/week for  1  year.  Half  of the group
 received  5% ethanol in their drinking water four  weeks before the
 beginning of  the vinyl chloride exposure and continued for life or
 termination of the  study. The results  showed that  the incidence
 of angiosarcoma in  vinyl chloride-ethanol  dosed  rats  (50%) was

-------
                                 IX-2

 Bore  than double that resulting from vinyl chloride  exposure  alone
 '23%).   vinyl  chloride-ethanol also induced a  greater number  of
 hepatocellular carcinomas (60%)  than occurred  in  vinyl chloride
 treated  animals (44%).   Thus,  ethanol was  shown to potentiate
 the toxicity of vinyl chloride.

      An  experiment  to determine  the interaction between vinylidene
 chloride (1,1-DCE)  and  vinyl ^chloride was  carred  out by Jaeger
               •  "   »
 (1975).   This'study measured hepatotoxicity by the elevation  of
 serum alanine-c(-ketoglutarate transaminase (ART).   When  fasted
 rats  were  exposed to  0.02%  1,1-DCE,  serum  ART  activity was eleva-
 ted about  50-fold,  two  hours after  the termination of  a 4-hour
 inhalation exposure.  No elevation  was observed when 0.1% vinyl
 chloride was administered alone.  When the  two chemicals  were
 a<3ninistered simultaneously at the  levels  indicated,  no elevation
 °f serum ART occurred.   These  results  were  interpreted to suggest
 that  vinyl chloride shows protective  effects when administered
 with vinylidene  chloride.

Sensitive Populations
     Sensitive populations are subgroups within the  general popula-
 tion which are at greater than average  risk upon exposure to a
chemical.  For vinyl chloride, several animal  studies  have suggested
 that sensitive groups may exist in the general population.

-------
                                  IX-3
      Groth  et  al.  (1981)  exposed adult Sprague-Dawley rats  to
     ppm vinyl  chloride  by inhalation for  7  hours/day,  5 days/week
  *or 24 weeks.   Four different  age  groups  of animals were used  (6,
  ?8» 32 and  52  weeks), and the  results  showed that adult animals
  and females are more susceptible to the angiosarcoma  inducing
  effects of vinyl chloride  than are  young  adult animals and males,
  respectively.

      Maltoni, et al. (1981) carr>d out a series of carcinogenicity
 studies on mice, hamsters and rats  (See Health Effects in Animals
 section).   These studies demonstrated that newborn animals appeared
 to be  extremely sensitive to the carcinogenic effect of vinyl chlo-
 ride,  with the  development of both hepatocarcinomas and angiosar-
 °omas.   in addition, evidence for transplacental carcinogenesis was
 seen.

     As discussed above,  Radike ejt  al.  (1981) showed that exposure
 to  vinyl chloride and ethanol together  produced  more hepatocellu-
 *ar carcinomas  and  angiosarcomas  than exposure to vinyl chloride
 alone.  Thus, these results indicate that  ethanol potentiates the
 fc°xicity of vinyl chloride.
     In summary, animal studies have  suggested that older individ-
uals,  females, newborns and alcohol  consumers may be particularly
8ensitive to the effects of vinyl chloride.

-------
                                IX-4
               of carcinogenic Risk
     Animal studies and epidemiologies studies  collectively confirm
     vinyl chloride is carcinogenic.  Numerous noncarcinogenic
 Affects have also been noted.  The NAS and EPA's GAG have calcu-
 lated projected incremental excess cancer risks associated
 with the consumption of a specific chemical via drinking water by
 ^thematical extrapolation from high-dose animal studies.  The
 tesults of these.'.calculations aite shown in Table IX-1.  Using the
     estimates generated by the NAS where the  linear non-threshold
     -stage model was utilized, it was estimated at the 95% confi-
 dence limit that consuming two liters of water per day over a
 ^fetime having a vinyl chloride concentration of 100 ug/1, 10 ug/1
 °r 1 ug/1 would increase the risk of one excess cancer per 10,000,
 lQ0,000 or 1,000,000 people exposed, respectively.  Using the
 r«viaed GAG approach and the linear multi-stage model, it can be
 *8timated at the 95% /confidence limit that consuming two liters
 &e* day over a lifetime having a vinyl choride concentration of
 2°° ug/1, 20' ug/1 or 2 ug/1 would increase the risk of one excess
 c*ncer per 10,000,  100,000 or 1,000,000 people exposed, respec-
 ^ively.   7^ selection of the data for use in  the model resulted
 il1 the difference in the GAG and NAS risk estimates, since the NAS
b*sed ita calculations on an ingestion study in which rats were
**Posed to vinyl chloride by gavage,  while the GAG used an inhala-
   a study.

-------
                                    DC-5

                                 TABLE IX-1

             Drinking Water Concentrations and Associated Cancer Risks
                                     Range of Concentrations  (ug/1)*
                          GAG                HAS                NAS
Cancer Risk
lO-4
10-5
10-6
limit)
200
20
2
limit)
100 170
10 17
1 1.7

*Assume 2 liters of water are consumed per day by a 70 kg adult for a
 70 year lifetime.

-------
                             X-l


Quantification of Toxicological Effects for Vinyl Chloride


     The quantification of toxicological effects of a chemical


consists of an assessment of the non-carcinogenic and carcino-


genic effects.  In the quantification of non-carcinogenic


effects, an Adjusted Acceptable Daily Intake (AADI) for the


chemical is determined.  For ingestion data, this approach


is illustrated as follows:


     Adjusted ADI =    (NOAEL or MEL in mg/kq)(70 kg)
                     (Uncertainty factor)(2 liters/day)


The 70 kg adult consuming 2 liters of water per day is used


as the basis for the calculations.  A "no-observed-adverse-effect-
                                                        •

level" or a "minimal-effect-level" is determined from animal


toxicity data or human effects data.  This level is divided


by an uncertainty factor because, for these numbers which are


derived from animal studies, there is no universally acceptable


quantitative method to extrapolate from animals to humans,


and the possibility must be considered that humans are more


sensitive to the toxic effects of chemicals than are animals.


For human toxicity data, an uncertainty factor is used to


account for the heterogeneity of the human population  in


which persons exhibit differing sensitivity to toxins.  The


guidelines set forth by the National Academy of Sciences


(Drinking Water and Health, Vol. 1,  1977) are used in  estab-


lishing uncertainty factors.  These  guidelines are as  follows:


an uncertainty factor of 10 is used  if there exist valid


experimental results on ingestion by humans, an uncertainty


factor of 100 is used  if there exist valid results on  long-


term feeding studies on experimental animals, and an uncertainty


factor of 1000 is used  if only limited data are' available.

-------
                              X-2
     In the quantification of carcinogenic effects, mathematical
models are used to calculate the estimated excess cancer
risks associated with the consumption of a chemical through
the drinking water.  EPA's Carcinogen Assessment Group has
used the multistage model, which is linear at low doses and
does not exhibit a threshold, to extrapolate from high dose
animal studies to low doses of the chemical expected in the
environment.  This model estimates the upper bound (95%
confidence limit) of the incremental excess cancer rate that
                              \
would be projected at a specific exposure level for a 70 kg
adult, consuming 2 liters of water per day, over a 70 year
lifespan.  Excess cancer risk rates also can be estimated
using other models such as the one-hit model, the Weibull
model, the logit model and the probit model.  Current
understanding of the biological mechanisms involved in cancer
do not allow for choosing among the models.  The estimates
of incremental risks associated with exposure to low doses
of potential carcinogens can differ by several orders of
magnitude when these models are applied. The linear, non-
threshold multi-stage model often gives one of the highest
risk estimates per dose and thus would usually be the one
most consistent with a regulatory philosophy which would
avoid underestimating potential risk.
     The scientific data base, which is used to support the
estimating of risk rate levels as well as other scientific

-------
                              X-3
 endeavors, has an inherent uncertainty.  In addition, in
 oany areas, there exists only limited knowledge concerning
 the health effects of contaminants at levels found in drinking
 water.  Thus,  the dose-response data gathered at high  levels  of
 exposure are  used for extrapolation to estimate responses  at
 levels  of exposure nearer to the range in which a  standard
 Bight be set* In most cases, data exist only for animals;  thus,
 uncertainty exists when the data are extrapolated  to  humans.
 When estimating risk rate levels, several other areas of
                              \
 uncertainty exist such as the effect of age,  sex,  species
 and target organ of the test animals used in the experiment,
 as  well  as the  exposure mode and dosing rates.   Additional
 uncertainty exists when there is exposure to more  than one
 contaminant due to the lack of information  about possible
 additive,  synergistic or antagonistic interactions.
 A«  Non-carcinogenic  Effects
     Vinyl  chloride  has been shown  to have  non-carcinogenic
 effects  in  animals and humans.   Acute and chronic  toxicity
 studies  have  shown the major effects  to be  congestion and
 edema of  the  lungs and hyperemia  of  the kidneys  and liver.
 Other non-carcinogenic effects have  been  noted,  including
 disturbances of  the  central nervous  system, pulmonary
 insufficiency,  cardiovascular manifestations, gastrointes-
 tinal symptoms  and acroosteolysis.
     Acute toxicity  tests with vinyl  chloride were carried
out by Patty e_t al.  (1930).  Single exposure of guinea pigs

-------
                            X-4
to vinyl chloride gas, 10 percent in air (100,000 ppra),
resulted in narcosis and death within 30 to 60 minutes.
Inhalation of lower concentrations resulted in ataxia
and narcosis.  Pathological findings at necropsy were
congestion and edema of the lungs and hyperemia of the
kidneys and liver.  Mastrometto et al. (1960)  exposed
mice, rats and guinea pigs in an inhalation chamber to
10, 20 or 30 per cent vinyl chloride in air for 1-30 minutes.
The principal pathological changes observed were pulmonary
                              \
edema and hemorrhages, and congestion of the liver and kidneys.
     In a chronic inhalation exposure study (Torkelsen
e_t al^., 1961), rats, rabbits, guinea pigs and dogs were
exposed repeatedly for up to six months to 50, 100, 200
or 500 ppm vinyl chloride in air.  Detectable changes
occurred at all but the lowest concentration.  Rats
exposed to 100 ppm (7 hours/day for 6 months) were judged
normal on the basis of appearance, mortality, growth, hemato-
logical examination and other factors.  However, slight
increases were found in the average weights of the livers of
male and female rats.  Rats, guinea pigs, rabbits and dogs
exposed to 50 ppm (7 hours/day for 6 months) appeared to be
normal in appearance, mortality and growth, and the increase
in Weight of the rat livers did not occur at this concentration.
At higher doses, pathological changes were increasingly more
pronounced.  Basalaev et al. (1972) administered gaseous vinyl
chloride to rats and rabbits at a concentration of 0.03 - 0.04
mg/1 for 4 hours/day for 6 months.  Cardiovascular disorders,

-------
                             X-5
 changes in the bioelectric activity of the hypothalaraus,
 nyperadrenalinemia, osteoporosis and resorption of bone
 tissue were observed.
      Feron ejt aiU (1981) carried out-a lifespan oral
 toxicity study of vinyl chloride in rats.  Vinyl chloride
 Monomer was incorporated into the diet, or gastric intubation
 °f a 10% vinyl chloride monomer solution in soya-bean oil
 was used.   Groups of 60-80 male and 60-80 female Wistar rats
 w®re exposed  to 0, 1.7, 5.0 and 14.1 mg/kg bw vinyl chloride
 in the diet,  or 300 mg/kg bw by gastric intubation.  A variety
 °f carcinogenic and noncarcinogenic effects were observed
 at all dose levels.   At the 14.1  and 300  mg/kg doses,  shortened
 blood-clotting times,  slightly increased    -foetoprotein  levels
 in the blood  serum,  liver enlargement  and an  increased haemato-
 poietic activity  in  the spleen were observed.   Non-neoplastic
 liver  lesions  consisting of  pronounced  swelling, discolora-
 tion and altered  consistency of the lobes as well  as  nodules
 and nodule-like processes  were observed.   At the lower dose
 Bevels  of 1.7  and  5.0 mg/kg  bw, histopathological  changes
 in the  liver were  observed  including clear-cell  foci,
extensive necrosis,  cysts, and liver-cell polymorphism.
     Suciu ejt al.  (1975) examined exposure of workers  to
v*nyl chloride at  high  concentrations.  Air concentrations
r*nging from 100 mg/ra3  (40 ppm) to  2,298 mg/m3  (900 ppm)
Produced euphoria, intoxication and narcosis, in a dose-
         relationship.   In an  epidemiological investigation,

-------
                                X-6
  Spirtas et al. (1975) conducted a survey of 200 vinyl chloride
  workers and 89 rubber plant workers (controls).  The vinyl
  chloride workers were categorized into low and high exposure
  Sroups.  The high exposure group consisted of workers who
  "ere  exposed to concentrations ranging from 20-200  ppra
  and the low exposure  group consisted of workers exposed  to
  °-50  ppm vinyl  chloride.   Information was  sought on the
  frequency of eight  symptoms,  including dizziness, nausea,
  headache and weakness.  The  results  showed  a  statistically
  8ignificant dose-response  relationship for  5 of  the  8 symp-
  toms when comparing vinyl  chloride workers  with  rubber
 workers, and between high  and low exposure  vinyl chloride
 vorkers.  A similar but non-significant trend in the remaining
 syn»ptoras categories was also noted.
 8»  Quantification of Non-Carcinogenic Effects
     In the calculation of an adjusted ADI, a chronic study
 ln  which animals or humans are exposed to the chemical at
  arious dose levels  with a no-observed-effect-level  or a
 minimal-effect-level being identified is used.   Ideally,  the
 study  should  use  the oral  route of  exposure.  For vinyl
 cMoride, the toxicological studies which fit  some of the
 above criteria are the Feron  et  a_l. (1981) and Torkelson e_t
^i»  (1961) studies.  The Torkelson et al_. (1961)  study examined
vinyl chloride inhalation exposure in rats,  rabbits,  guinea
     and dogs at various dose levels.  At 100 ppra, the only
    rsa effect noted was the slight increase in the weight
  the  livers in the rat, and not in the other species.

-------
                              X-7
Thus, a rainimal-effeet-level of 100 ppm could be used for
the derivation of the an adjusted ADI.  However, a major,
limitation of this study is that inhalation exposure was
used, which presents problems in terms of conversion factors
needed to convert from inhalation to ingestion exposure.
     In the Feron et. a^L. (1981) study, carcinogenic and
non-carcinogenic effects were observed at all dose levels.
At the lowest dose of 1.7 rag/kg bw, a variety of effects
were reported,  including narcosis of the liver, liver cysts
and nodules.  It is  not possible to identify a no-observed-
adverse-effect-level from this study, as effects were seen
at every dose level. However, 1.7 mg/kg/day may be used as
a minimal-effect-level  for  the purpose of calculating an
adjusted ADI, using  an  appropriate safety factor to account
for  the  fact  that  the no-observed-adverse-effect-level  is
below  this  value.  Using  this  study,  the calculations are  as
follows:
             (1.7 mg/kg/dav)(70 kg) =  Q.06 mg/1
                {1000X2 I/day)
Where:  1.7  mg/kg  = Miniraal-effeet-level  from Feron et al..
                    (1981)  study
        70  kg  *  Average  body weight of adult human
        1000 = Uncertainty factor;  animal study where
              no-observed-adverse-effect-level was not
               identified
        2 liter  « water consumption per day for an adult human
 Thus,  the adjusted ADI for vinyl chloride using non-carcinogenic
 data and 100 percent exposure from drinking water would be
 0.06 mg/1. This number should be appropriately reduced if

-------
                              X-8
 there is shown to be significant vinyl chloride exposure
 from other sources, such as food and air.

 c» Carcinogenic Effects
      Vinyl chloride has been shown to have carcinogenic
 effects in animals and humans.  Viola et al. (1971)
 reported the carcinogenic response of male rats (AR/IRE
 Wistar strain)  exposed to vinyl chloride by inhalation.
 Rats exposed to 30,000 ppm vinyl chloride for 4 hours/
 day, 5 days/week for 12 months, demonstrated an increased
 incidence  of skin carcinomas,  lung adenocarcinomas and
 bone osteochondroma over controls.
      Caputo ejt  al.  (1974)  exposed male  and female  rats
 (A and IRE  Wistar strain)  by inhalation to 0,  50,  500,
 2,000,  5,000, 10,000 and 20,000 ppm vinyl chloride.
 Liver angiosarcomas,  lung  adenocarcinomas and  skin
 squamous cell carcinomas were  observed  in all  groups
 except those exposed to 50  ppm.   Tumors appeared between
 8  and  13 months from the beginning  of the inhalation
 treatment.
     A series of  inhalation  and  ingestion studies
examining the carcinogenic  effects  of vinyl  chloride have
been conducted by Maltoni  (Maltoni, 1981).  Vinyl  chloride
was shown to cause tumors in all  the animal  systems tested
twice, rats and hamsters) both through  inhalation  and  ingestion
exposure.  In one study, Sprague-Dawley rats were  exposed by

-------
                             X-9
 inhalation to vinyl chloride at concentrations ranging from
 50 to 100,000 ppm for 52 weeks.  Angiosarcoraa of liver,
 zymbal gland carcinomas, skin carcinomas, mammary carcinomas
 and other tumors were found to occur'.  One ingest ion study
 showed the occurrence of angiosarcoma of the liver, mammary
 carcinomas and other tumors at 50.0 mg/kg.
     As discussed in the "Non-Carcinogenic Effects"
 section, Peron ejt al. (1981) carried out a lifespan oral
 toxicity study of vinyl chloride in rats,  wistar rats
 were exposed to 0, 1.7, 5.0 and* 14.1 mg/kg bw vinyl
 chloride in the diet, or 300 mg/kg bw vinyl chloride by
 gastric intubation.  The results showed that rats exposed
 to vinyl chloride, monomer at levels of 5.0 mg/kg bw or
 more demonstrated hepatic angiosarcomas, pulmonary
 angiosarcomas, and at the higher levels, a few extra-
 hepatic abdominal angiosarcomas.  At the lowest exposure
 level of 1.7 mg/kg vinyl chloride, liver-cell tumors and
 an increased incidence of foci of cellular alteration
 were noted.  The author concluded that vinyl chloride is
 a carcinogen when administered by the oral route, and
 that the tumor response seems to shift from the exclusive
 development of angiosarcomas at very high levels to the
 exclusive induction of hepatocellular tumors at low levels
 °f exposure.
     Epidemiological studies examining the carcinogenic
effects of vinyl chloride have also been carried out.
The first study associating vinyl chloride exposure in

-------
                              X-10
 humans with cancer was conducted by Creech and Johnson,
 1974.  This study described three cases of angiosarcoroa
 of the liver in workers at a polymerization plant in
 Louisville, Kentucky.   Since that time, a  number of
 studies have also demonstrated this association.
      Monson et_ a^. (1975)  conducted a  proportional mortality
 study of workers from  two  vinyl chloride plants who  died
 between 1947 and 1973.  Death certificates were obtained  for
 142 out of 161 workers (88%)  who died  within this time period.
                               \
 Deaths attributable to cancer were  50  percent higher than
 expected (a statistically  significant  difference).   A 900
 percent increase in cancers of the  liver and biliary tract
 vas noted  (five angiosarcomas).   Excluding angiosarcoma,  a
 275 percent excess in  numbers of cancers was observed.
              •
 Nicholson  et al.  (1975)  studied  a group of 257  workers (of
 whom 255 were  traced)  exposed to vinyl  chloride for  at least
 5  years  in a polymerization facility.   Exposures were estimated
 to often exceed  10,000 ppm.   Their  mortality status  was evalua-
 ted  beginning  10  years after  start  of  employment until 1974.
 Among  the  24 deaths were 3  cases  of angiosarcoma  of  the
 iiver.  Preliminary findings  indicated  a 25  percent  increase
 in deaths  over  the expected number  and  a 131  percent  increase
 in all cancer deaths, although neither  of  these  increases
was statistically  significant.
     The National  Institute for Occupational  Safety  and
Health  (NIOSH) conducted a study which  involved  1,294
 individuals who were exposed  to vinyl chloride  for at

-------
least 5 years, and for whom at least 10 years had elapsed
since initial employment.  A total of 136 deaths were
reported versus 126.3 expected (not a significant differ-
ence).  A 49 percent increase over the expected number of
cancer deaths was noted, a statistically significant factor.
A statistically significant excess number of deaths occurred
for brain and CNS cancer, respiratory cancer, and biliary and
liver cancer (Waxweiler et al, 1976).
     According to the International Agency for Research on
Cancer (IARC, 1979), vinyl chloride is a human and animal
carcinogen.  IARC'S evaluation^.of the chemical is as follows:
"Vinyl chloride was tested in rats by oral, subcutaneous and
intraperitoneal administration and in mice, rats and hamsters
by inhalation exposure.  Following oral and inhalation
exposure, vinyl chloride was carcinogenic in all three species,
producing tumors at different sites, including angiosarcoma of
the liver.  Vinyl chloride was carcinogenic in rats following
prenatal exposure.  A dose-response has been demonstrated.
     Vinyl chloride is a human carcinogen.  Its target organs
are the liver, brain, lung and haerao-lymphopoietic system.
Similar carcinogenic effects were first demonstrated in rats
and were later confirmed in mice and hamsters.  Although
evidence of a carcinogenic effect of vinyl chloride in humans
has come from groups occupationally exposed to high doses of
vinyl chloride, there is no evidence that there is an exposure
level below which no increased risk of cancer would occur in
humans".

-------
                              X-12
     Vinyl chloride has been studied in a variety of short-
term test systems which evaluate the mutagenic potential of
the compound and/or its potential for interaction with DNA.
The results of these studies are summarized in Table 1.
Positive results in certain of these test systems are
considered to be predictive of carcinogenic potential.
     When considering all of the data on vinyl chloride,
It is probable that vinyl chloride can exert its carcino-
Senicity through genotoxic mechanisms.  It thus becomes
                               \
necessary to estimate the carcinogenic risk from exposure to
vinyl chloride.

-------
                              X-13

   TABLE 1 - Results of Vinyl Chloride Mutagenicity Studies

A. Assay system            Results        References
In Vitro prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems
Metabolically activated
Salmonella typhimurium
system (Ames)
Escherichia coli K12
bioauxotrophic strain

Yeast

Germ cells of Drosophilj(a

Chinese hamster V79 cells

B. DNA Binding Studies

Mouse tissues (brain, lung,
liver, kidney, spleen,
pancreas and testes) in
vitro

Rat liver microsomes,
reconstituted cytochrorae
P-450 systems and isolated
hepatocytes

Rat liver microsomes with
NADPH
            Bartsch e_t al., 1975
            McCann et aT7, 1975
            Elmore et al., 1976
            Rannug ejt al., 1974
            Garro et alT, 1976

            Greim et al., 1975
            Loprieno et al, 1976, 1977

            Verburgt and Vogel, 1977

            Huberman et al.,  1975



            Bergman, 1982
(Irreversible
binding to
RNA and DNA)

+           Guengerich et al.
(Irreversible
binding to
Protein and DNA)
1981
(Alkylation
of RNA)
            Laib and Holt, 1977
C. Biochemical or biologic consequences of DNA damage
Bone marrow cells of
rats (in vivo)
Bone marrow cells of
Chinese hamsters (in vivo)
+           Anderson and Richardson,
(Chromosome   1976
damage)

+           Basler and Rohrborn, 1980
(Chromosome
aberrations and
sister-chromatid-
exchanges)
Cultured peripheral lympho-   +            Purchase e_t a_l., 1978
cytes in humans (vinyl      (Chromosomal   Purchase e_t a_l., 1975
chloride exposed workers)   abnormalities) Ducatman et al., 1975

-------
                               X-14
 D. Quantification of Carcinogenic Effects
      EPA's Carcinogen Assessment Group (GAG) have used the
 linear multistage model to calculate the projected excess
 cancer risk resulting from lifetime exposure to vinyl chloride
 -through the drinking water.  The CAG numbers were calculated
 assuming consumption of 2 liters of drinking water and 6.5
 grams fish and shellfish per day, and were published in the
 Ambient Water Quality Criteria Document for Vinyl Chloride,
 U.S.  EPA 440/5-80-078.  For vinyl chloride, CAG used the
 incidence of total tumors in rats exposed through inhalation
 (Maltoni et al, 1975) to calculate the excess cancer risk.
 They  calculated that consuming 2 liters of water per day
 having  a vinyl chloride concentration of 200 ug/1,  20 ug/1
 or 2  ug/1 would increase the risk of one excess cancer per
 10,000  (10~4), 100,000 (10-5)  or 1,000,000 (10~6)  respectively,
 per lifetime.
      There are several problems  with the  data used  by CAG
 in risk  estimation.   The major problem is that inhalation
          •
 data  were  used,  and  the  relationship between oral and
 inhalation exposure  toxicity is  not  well  understood.
      The National Academy of Sciences  (NAS)  have also
 calculated  excess cancer risk  values using  the multistage
model.  The NAS  have published these calculations in  Drinking
Water and Health, Vol..l, 1977.   For vinyl  chloride,  ingestion
data  from the Maltoni e_t al. (1975)  study was  used,   in  this
study, rats were given vinyl chloride  in  olive oil  by gavage,
four or five times per week for  52 weeks  and  held for their

-------
                                 X-15
   life  span.   This experiment was  not  completed  at  the  time
   HAS performed  its computations,  but  the available data did
   indicate  the development of liver  arigiosarcomas and other
   tumors in rats exposed to 16.65 mg/kg.  The HAS made the
  decision to use this study  because it was felt that the
  limited gavage data were still superior to completed
  inhalation studies for assessing risk by the oral  route.
       The  NAS have calculated that consuming 2 liters of
  water  per day over a lifetime at a vinyl  chloride  concen-
  tration of 100  ug/1,  10  ug/1 or 1 ug/1  would increase  the
  risk of one  excess cancer per 10,000  (10"4),  100,000  (10~5),
  °r 1,000,000  (10-6)  people exposed, respectively.
      The major problem with  the NAS data is  that the
 Maltoni experiment was not completed  at the time the risk
 calculations were  carried out, and thus the data cannot be
 considered definitive.  However, since that time the Maltoni
 e*periment has been completed, and the NAS (Drinking Water and
 leaTth, Vol.  V,  1983) reexamined the data  and decided to
 continue using their 1977 risk estimates.   Thus, the NAS
 risk estimation  uses ingestion exposure  and represents  the
 best estimate  of the  carcinogenic  risk from exposure  to
 vinyl chloride that is available at  this time.   Using the
NAS data, the excess cancer risk concentrations  associated
with 10~4,  10"5, and 10~6 excess risk  rates are  100 ug/1,
10 ug/1, and 1 ug/1, respectively.

-------
                              X-16
     The World Health Organization has not calculated an
action level for vinyl chloride.  An EPA Health Advisory
number for vinyl chloride also has not been calculated.
     In the quantification of toxicological effects for a
chemical, consideration should be given to subgroups within
the general population which are at greater than average
risk upon exposure to the chemical.  For vinyl chloride,
animal studies have indicated that older individuals, females,
newborns and alcohol consumers may be particularly sensitive
to the effects of vinyl chloride.
     Vinyl chloride has also been demonstrated to have
interactions with other chemicals.  Ingestion of ethanol was
shown to increase the  incidence  of liver tumors in rats
(Radike et al.,  1977)  and vinyl  chloride was demonstrated to
have protective  effects when administered with 1,1-dichloroethylene
(Jaeger, 1975) .

-------
     EPA's Carcinogen Assessment Group  (CAG) have recently



recalculated their excess carcinogenic  risk estimates resulting



from lifetime exposure to vinyl chloride through the drinking



water.  CAG based their preliminary revised risk estimates (1984)



on the Feron et al. (198.1) study.  The .total number of tumors,



considering tumors of the lung and liver,  in rats exposed through



the diet were used to calculate the excess cancer risk.  They



calculated that consuming 2  liters of water per day having



a vinyl chloride concentration of 1.5 ug/1, 0.15 ug/1 and



0.015 ug/1 would increase the risk of one  excess cancer per



10,000 (10~4), 100,000 (10~5) or 1,000,000 (1Q-6) people



exposed, respectively, per lifetime.

-------
                             X-17

                          REFERENCES

Anderson, D. and C.R. Richardson.  1976.  Paradichlorobenzene:
  Cytogenic study in the rat.  ICI Report CTL/P1293.   November,
  1976 (unpublished).

Bartsch, H., C. Malaveille, and R. Montesano.  1975.   Human,
  rat and mouse liver-mediated mutagenicity of vinyl  chloride
  in £. typhimurium strains.  Int. Jour. Cancer.  15:429-437.

Basalaev, A.V., A.N. Vazine, and A.6. Kochetkov.   1972.   On
  the pathogenesis of changes developing due to a long-term
  exposure to the effects of vinyl chloride.  Gig. Tr. Prof.
  Zabol. 16:(2):24-27.

Basler, A. and G. Rohrborn.  1980.  Vinyl chloride: An example
  of evaluating mutagenic effects in mammals in vivo  after
  exposure to inhalation.  Arch. Toxicol. 45:1-7.

Bergmanr K.  1982.  Reactions of vinyl chloride with  RNA and
  DNA of various mouse tissues in vivo.  Arch. Toxicol.  49:
  117-129.

Caputo, A., P.L. Viola, and A. Bigotti.  1974.  Oncogenicity
  of vinyl chloride at low concentrations in rats and rabbits.
  IRCS 2:1582.

Creech, J.L. and M.N. Johnson.  1974.  Angiosarcoma of the
  liver in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride.  Jour.
  Occup. Med. 16:150-151.

Ducatman, A., K. Hirshhorn and I.J. Selikoff.  1975.   Vinyl
  chloride exposure and human chromosome aberrations.
  Mutat. Res. 31:163-168.

Elmore, J.D., J.L. Wong, A.D. Laumbach, U.N. Streips.  1976.
  Vinyl chloride mutagenicity via the metabolites chloro-
  oxirane and chloroacetaldehyde monomer hydrate.  Biochim.
  Biophys. Acta. 442:405-419.

Feron, V.J., C.F.M. Hendrikson, A.J. Speek, H.P. Til, and
  B.J. Spit.   1981.   Lifespan oral  toxicity  study of  vinyl
  chloride  in  rats.   Fd. Cosmet. Toxicol. 19:317-331.

Garro, A.J., J.B. Guttenplan, and P. Miluy.   1976.  Vinyl
  chloride dependent  mutagenesis: effects of  liver extracts
  and  free  radicals.   Mutat. Res.  38:81-88.

Greim, H., G.  Bonse,  2. Radwan,  D.  Reichert,  and D. Henschler.
  1975.  Mutagenicity in vitro  and  potential  carcinogenicity
  of chlorinated ethylenes as a function of metabolic oxirane
  formation.   Biochem. Pharmacol.  24:2013-2017.

-------
                            X-18

Guengerich, P.P., P. Mason, W. Stott, T. Fox, and P.G.
  Watanabe.  1981.  Roles of 2-Haloethylene oxides and
  2-haloacetaldehydes derived from vinyl bromide and
  vinyl chloride in irreversible binding to protein
  and DNA.  Cancer Res. 41:4391-4398.

Huberman, E., H. Bartsch, and L. Sachs.  1975.  Mutation
  induction in Chinese hamster V79 cells by two vinyl
  chloride metabolites, chloroethylene oxide and 2-chloro-
  acetaldehyde.  Int. Jour. Cancer. 16:639-644.

International Agency for Research on Cancer.  1979.  IKRC
  monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of
  chemicals to man.  Vol. 19.  Lyon, Prance.

Jaeger, R.J.  1975,  Vinyl chloride monomer: comments on
  its hepatoxicity and interaction with 1,1-dichloroethylene.
  Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 246:150^-151.

Laib, R.J. and H.M. Bolt.  1977.  Alkylation of RNA by
  vinyl chloride metabolites in vitro and in vivo; formation
  of l-N*-etheno-adenosine.  Toxicology 8:185-195.

Loprieno, H., R. Barale, S. Baroncelli, H. Bartsch,
  G. Bronzetti, A. Cammellini, C. Corsi, D. Frezza, and
  A.M. Rossi.  1977.  Induction of gene mutations and
  gene conversions by vinyl chloride metabolites in
  yeast.  Cancer Res. 253-257.

Loprieno, N., R. Barale, S. Baroncelli, C. Bauer,
  G. Bronzetti, A. Cammellini, G. Cercingnani, C. Corsi,
  G. Gervasi, C. Leporini, R. Nieri, A.M. Rossi, G. Stretti,
  and G. Turchi.  1976.  Evaluation of the genetic effects
  induced by vinyl chloride monomer (VCM) under mammalian
  metabolic activation: studies in vitro and in vivo.
  Mutat. Res. 40:85-96.

Maltoni, C.  1977.  Vinyl chloride carcinogenicity: an
  experimental model for carcinogenesis studies.  In;
  Hiatt, H.H., J.D. Watson, and J.A. Winsten (eds.),
  Origins of Human Cancer, Book A.  Cold Spring Harbor
  Laboratory, 119-146.

Maltoni, C., A. Ciliberti, L. Gianni, and P. Chieco. 1975.
  The oncogenic effects of vinyl chloride administered  by
  oral route in the rat.  Gli Ospedali vita 2(6):65-66.

Mastromatteo, E., A.M. Fisher, H. Christie, and H. Danzinger,
  1960.  Acute inhalation toxicity of vinyl chloride to
  laboratory animals.  Amer. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 21:394-
  398.

-------
                             X-19

McCann, J., V. Simmon, D. Streitweiser, and B.N. Ames.
  1975.  Mutagenicity of chloroacetaldehyde, a possible
  metabolic product of 1,2-dichloroethane (ethylene
  dichloride), chloroethanol (ethylene chlorohydrin),
  vinyl chloride, and cyclophosphamide.  Proc. Natl.
  Acad. Sci. 72:3190-3193.

Monson, R.R., J.M. Peters, and M.N. Johnson.  1975.
  Proportional mortality among vinyl chloride workers.
  Environ. Health Perspec. 11:75-77.

National Academy of Sciences.  1977.  Drinking Water and
  Health, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

Nicholson, W.J., B.C. Hammond, H. Seidman, and I.J. Selikoff.
  1975.  Mortality experience of a cohort of vinyl  chloride-
  polyvinyl chloride workers.. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 246:225-
  230.

Patty, P.A., W.P. Yant, and C.P. Waite.  1930.  Acute response
  of guinea pigs to vapors of some new commercial organic
  compounds.  V. Vinyl chloride.  Pub. Health Reports 45:
  1963-1971.

Purchase, I.F.H., C.R. Richardson, D. Anderson.  1975.
  Chromosomal and dominant lethal effects of vinyl  chloride.
  Lancet 2(7931):410-411.

Purchase, I.F.H., C.R. Richardson, D. Anderson, G.M. Paddle,
  and W.G.F. Adams.  1978.  Chromosomal analyses in vinyl
  chloride-exposed workers.  Mut. Res, 57:325-334.

Radike, M.J.  1977.  Effect of ethanol and vinyl chloride
  on the induction of liver tumors: preliminary report.
  Environ. Health Perspect. 21:153-155.

Rannug, 0*, A. Johansson, C. Ramel, and C.A. Wachtmeister.
  1974.  The mutagenicity of vinyl chloride after metabolic
  activation.  Ambio 3:194-197.

Spirtas, R., A.J. McMichael, J. Gamble, and M. Van  Ert.
  1975.  The association of vinyl chloride exposures with
  morbidity symptoms.  Amer. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J. 36:779-
  789.

Suciu, I., L. Prodan, E. Ilea, A. Paduraru, and L.  Pascu.
  1975.  Clinical manifestations in vinyl chloride  poisoning.
  Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 246:53-69.

Torkelson, R.R., F. Oyen, and V.K. Rowe.  1961.  The
  toxicity of vinyl chloride as determined by repeated
  exposure of laboratory animals.  Amer. Ind. Hyg.  Assoc.
  J. 22:354-361.

-------
                            X-20

US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Regulations
  and Standards.  1980.  Ambient Water Quality Criteria for
  Vinyl Chloride.  EPA 440/5-80-078.

Verburgt, F.G. and E.  Vogel.  1977..  Vinyl chloride
  mutagenesis in Drosopnila melanogaster.  Mutat. Res.
  48:327-336.

Viola, P.L., A. Bigotti, and A. Caputo.  1971.  Oncogenic
  response of rat skin, lungs, bones to vinyl chloride.
  Cancer Res. 31:516-522.

Waxweiler, R.J., W. Stringer, J.K. Wagoner, J. Jones,
  H. Falk, and C. Carter.  1976.  Neoplastic risk among
  workers exposed to vinyl chloride.  Ann. N.Y. Acad.  Sci.
  271:40-48.

-------