TRANSCRIPT OF CONFERENCE
IN THE MATTER OF
POLLUTION o  tie NAVIGABLE WATERS
                   tie
    DETROIT RIVER W LAKE ERIE
      THEIR TRIBUTARIES WITHIN

                  tie

          STATE ^MICHIGAN
              First Session
           March 27-28, 1962
            Detroit, Michigan
                                Volume II, Part 1
                                March 28, 1962

-------
        U. S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE

                       PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
            JOINT FEDERAL-STATE OF MICHIGAN CONFERENCE

                                ON

               POLLUTION OF NAVIGABLE WATERS OF THE

                DETROIT RIVER, LAKE ERIE, AND THEIR

             TRIBUTARIES WITHIN THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
                           First Session
                     Wednesday, March 28, 1962
              Banquet Hall, Veterans Memorial Building
                         Detroit, Michigan
Volume II - Part 1                                      .  Pages 1?8 through 515

-------
                                                                   178

                            CONTENTS
STATJiMEN'i.' QF;                                                     PAGE:

LORING F. OEMING, Chief Engineer, Water
     Resources Commission, State of Michigan                       185

MILTON P. ADAMS, Executive Secretary, Michigan
     Water Resources Commission                                    191

JOHN E. VOGT, Director of the Division of
     Engineering, Michigan Department of Health,
     and Donald M. Pierce, Cihef of the Section
     of Sewerage and Sewerage Treatment of the
     Division of Engineering                                       208

LORING F. OEMING, Further statement                                277

NICHOLAS V. OLDS, Assistant Attorney General,
     State of Michigan                                             337

ARTHUR C. ELMER, Chief, Division of Parks and
     Recreation, Department of Conservation,
     State of Michigan                                             361

H. J. MILLER, Department of Conservation, State
     of Michigan                                                   367

KEITH WILSON, Director, Michigan State Waterways
     Commission                                                    393

GLENN C. RICHARDS, Commissioner, Department of
     Public Works, Room 513 City-County Building,
     Detroit 26, Michigan                                          397

CLYDE L. PALMER, City Engineer, City of Detroit,
     Michigan

GERALD J. REMUS, General Manager, Board of Water
     Commissioners, City of Detroit, Water Board
     Building, 735 Randolph Street, Detroit 26,
     Michigan

JAMES M. DAVEY, Managing Director, Board of
     Wayne County Road Commissioners                               k62

GEORGE R. BINGHAM, Sanitary Engineer, Wayne
     County Road Commission Director, Department
     of Public Works, on behalf of the County of
     Wayne, Michigan                                               U65

DAVID R. CALHOUN, Chairman, Physical Planning
     Committee, Supervisors Inter-County
     Committee, Mac omb-Monroe -Oakland -St.
     Clair-Washtenaw-Wayne, Michigan

-------
                                                                    179
             TABLE  OF  £ONTENTS

                         (Continued)


STATEMENT OF;                                                     PAGE;

KENNETH L. HALLENBECK, Director, the Huron-
     Clinton Metropolitan Authority, 1750
     Guardian Building, Detroit 26, Michigan                       W3l

EDWARD A. MALLONEN, representing Mr. Kenneth
     Hallenbeck, Director, the Huron-Clinton
     Metropolitan Authority                                        1*83

PAUL M. REID, Executive Director, Detroit
     Metropolitan Area Regional Planning
     Commission, 800 Cadillac Square Building,
     Detroit 26, Michigan                                          U85

THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, County of
     Oak]and, Michigan, and the Drain
     Commission, County of Oakland, Michigan                       U88

CARL F. BUFE, Superintendent, Department of
     Municipal Service, and George J. Hazey,
     Superintendent, Water Division, Department
     of Municipal Service, 2555 Van Alstyne
     Boulevard, Wyandotte, Michigan                                k$k

JOHN CHASCSA, President, Lake Erie Clean-up
     Committee, Newport, Michigan                                  515

-------
                PROCEEDINGS                    180



          The Conference in the Matter of Pollution of the




Navigable Waters of the Detroit River and its Tributaries



within the State of Michigan, and Lake Erie and its trib-



utaries within the State of Michigan, reconvened at 9 a.m.,



Eastern Standard Time, March 28, 1962, Banquet KaM,



Veteran's Memorial Building, Detroit, Michigan.



          PRESIDING:




               Mr. Murray Stein, Chief, Enforcement



          Branch, Water Supply and Pollution Control,




          Public Health Service, Department of Health,



          Education, and Welfare, Washington, 25, D. C.




          PRESENT:



               Mr. Murray Stein, Chief, Enforcement




          Branch, Water Supply and Pollution Control,



          Public Health Service, Department of Health,




          Education,, and Welfare, Washington 25, D. C.



                 MICHIGAN WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION




               Albert E. Heustls, M.D., Chairman,




          State Health Commissioner.



               Gerald E. Eddy, Director of Conservation.



               George F. Liddle, Muskegon, Municipal




          Groups.



               James S. Gilmore, Jr., Kalaraazoo,



          Industrial Management Groups.

-------
                                                       181



         DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE



                H.  W.  Poston, Regional Program Director,



           Water Supply and Pollution Control, Public



           Health Service, Region V,  433 West Van Buren



           Street,  Chicago 7* Illinois








           THE CHAIRMAN:  May we reconvene.   This is  a con-



 tinuation of the hearings in the matter of  pollution of



 waters of the United  States in Lake  St. Clair, the Detroit



 River, and Western Lake Erie in the  Detroit Area.



           At this point we will call on Dr. Heustis, of



 the Health Department of the State of Michigan.  Dr. Heustis.



           DR. HEUSTIS:  Mr. Stein, and gentlemen, and ladies,



 too.  I am very happy to accept the  assignment to present



 to the conference the statement of the State of Michigan



 and its invited participants.  I would ask  that you, Mr.



 Stein, convey on our behalf to the Secretary of the  Depart-



 ment of Health, Education, and Welfare, our sincere  appre-



ciation for allowing us to seat as conferees Mr. James



 Gilmore, representing Industrial Management, on the  far



 right; Mr. George Llddle, beside me, representing the



 municipalities; Mr. Gerald Eddy, the Director of the Munic-



 ipal Department of Conservation, at  Mr. Stein's right,



 and myself.  We realize very well that this is a greater



 number of State conferees than has been the practice in  past

-------
                                                      182




procedures such as this, and we do appreciate the kindness



of the Secretary in allowing us to have the representation



we believed Important.



          Mr. Stein, to show our appreciation of this,



and In order not to complicate the recommendation process,



I propose to recommend to my colleagues that we State con-




ferees jointly cast but one vote at the time of the making



of the recommendations, thus granting a clear majority to




the Federal representatives.  The State representatives were



Impressed by the report presented yesterday by the Public




Health Service, and while we reserve the full right to dis-



agree, we would compliment them on the Job which they did




in so short a time.



          We appreciate too the remarks of some of the other




Federal representatives, and we are tolerant of the remarks




made by others.  We are certainly looking to the United



States Attorney's office to carry out the legal responsi-



bilities which it has under other statutes in cooperation



with other Federal agencies.  However, for the moment,




speaking of tolerance and asking questions, Mr. Stein, I




wonder if I may trouble you for a glass of water?



          THE CHAIRMAN:  Surely.  While you are doing this,




we hope we won't have a vote at the end of this.  We hope




we can get a consensus.



          DR. HEUSTIS:  Real fine water.  Only one thing,

-------
                                                      183



Mr. Stein.  The thing Is every time I drink this fine



Detroit water my heart goes out to all of the kids in this



vast metropolitan area that are deprived of the benefits



of fluoridatlon and the wonderful public health benefits



in preventing cavities in teeth.  I would think maybe we



might under somewhat different circumstances look forward



in the future to the continued  help  of the Public Health



Service and helping our friends in Detroit and the metro-



ppiitan area just to accomplish this wonderful public



health protection matter.



          As I have discussed with the Chairman, I would



propose a slight modification of yesterday's procedure.



We have a lot of material to present, and so do our in-



vitees.  All of the material that will be presented today



is in written form.  We would propose then as each witness



is called upon, to place his written testimony in the record



Just as though he had read it.  We would propose further



that if the individuals concerned have an opportunity to



informally present oral testimony, that this oral testi-



mony be not made a part of the written record, unless it



Is specifically requested by the witness, and only such



parts as may be specifically requested by the witness will



be made parts of the written record.  In this way, first



of all, should there be any discrepancy  the Chairman and



I have agreed, between what is said orally and what is in

-------
                                                      184



writing, the written record will prevail.  By this method



we would hope to present a great amount of material and



would hope to discourage the reading of long statements.



          My proposal, which is made with the Water Resource?



Commission of Michigan is made in view of my feeling that



everyone is entitled to place everything they wish in the



record but very little good Is gained by anyone repeating



what has been said before.  Yet, by the fact that their



statement may be placed in the written record, which Mr.



Stein assured me will be printed, and which each one of



the conferees will thoroughly consider before arriving at



any recommendation, we feel that this will give them an



opportunity to be heard and at the same time might cut down



on our time a little bit today.



          If this procedure is agreeable, as I have been



assured it will be, the State's first presentation will



be a combined report of the Michigan Water Resources Com-



mission and the Michigan Department of Health. This report



will be presented by several persons who will be Introduced



by Mr. Loring Oeming, the Chief Engineer of the Water Re-



sources Commission, who will also introduce the  report.



          I would request, Mr. Stein, as was done yesterday,.



that the full report be placed before us before any questions



or comments are entertained, and I would hereby place in



the official record of this proceeding a copy of the report

-------
                                                      185
which,  if you do not have it in front of you, you should
have it  in a minute, with all of the maps, and all of the
maps that will be used this morning.  Here are the copies
for the  conferees.
          I would also announce to those present that at
the conclusion of the State's report, within the numbers
available, within the numbers we have with us, the copies
of this  report will be available, and if any members of
the press should come in, of course, they may have a copy
of the report as we go along.
          Mr. Oeming, will you begin?
          STATEMENT OF LORING F. OEMING, CHIEF
          ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION,
          STATE OF MICHIGAN
          MR. OEMING:  Dr. Heustis, Chairman Stein,  con-
ferees,  and ladies and gentlemen.
          My name is Loring F. Oeming.  I am the Chief
Engineer for the Michigan Water Resources Commission.  As
Dr. Heustis pointed out, we have placed before you this
morning  a report which is the result of a joint effort by
the employed staffs of the Water Resources Commission and
the Michigan. Department of Health.  This report is entitled,
"Water Pollution Control in the River Basins of the  South-
eastern Michigan Region" and is dated March 1962. The re-
port contains information on the municipal sewage and Indus-

-------
                                                      186
trial waste disposal situation in Lake St. Glair, the
Detroit River, upper Lake Erie, and in the river basins
tributary to these waters.  It delineates accomplishments
in controlling pollution and measures being taken to provide
improved control.  It also defines the needs to effect fur-
ther improvement in the condition of these waters.
          The report was prepared for presentation to the
conferees at the Federal conference called by the Secretary
of Health, Education, and Welfare for their consideration
and appraisal in arriving at conclusions as to the adequacy
of measures taken toward abatement of pollution and in de-
termining the nature of delays, if any, being encountered
in abating pollution.
          The area encompassed by the report includes all of
the drainage basins of the Clinton, Rouge, Huron and Raisin
Rivers and the shoreline area of Lake St. Glair, Detroit
River and Lake Erie within Michigan which drains directly
or through minor tributaries to these bodies of water.
          All sources of municipal sewage and industrial
waste discharges to these waters are covered.  The nature
of waste treatment or control measures in effect are de-
scribed and the state agency action to control pollution is
related.
          The files and records of the Michigan Department oi
Health and Michigan Water Resources Commission are the sources

-------
                                                      187
of information contained in the report.  The employed
staffs of both agencies collaborated In assembling the
material and in preparing the report.
          The report Is divided into four main headings,
first, the statutory authority, policies and procedures;
Chapter II municipal sewage collection and treatment;
III industrial waste treatment and control; and IV, the
accomplishments and the work to be done.
          Chapter I discusses state laws available to con-
trol pollution and the relationships that exist between the
several agencies of the state in administering these laws.
A resume of the contents of this chapter will be given by
Mr. Adams, the Executive Secretary of the Commission.
          Chapter II gives detailed information on the
types and extent of the sewer systems; the disposal and
treatment methods in effect at all governmental units with-
in the region.  It presents the opinions of the staff of
the two state agencies and the adequacy of the systems and
methods of disposal or treatment in preventing unlawful
pollution as defined in the state statutes.  The contents
of this chapter, together with the applicable portions in
Chapter IV will be presented by J. £. Vogt and Donald
Pierce of the Michigan Department of Health,
          Chapter III Identifies each of the sources of
industrial waste discharges to the water courses in all of

-------
                                                      188



the river basins involved.  It discusses in general terras



the principal waste constituents and the methods of control



or treatment in effect; the types of action taken by the



Water Resources Commission and its predecessor, the Stream



Control Commission, to obtain control.  It shows the rating



assigned to each at the present time.



          I will conclude the presentation of the report



with a review of the contents of Chapter III, together with



the applicable portions of Chapter IV.



          As an aid in visualizing the area covered by



the report we have prepared a series of orientation maps



which will be referred to in briefing these chapters of



the report.



          At this time I would like to take a minute to



run through these maps and to familiarize you with them.



The base orientation map is the one entitled "Municipal



Sewage Disposal in the  Elver Basins of Southeastern Mich-



igan,"  This map shows the outline of all the drainage



basins referred to in the report.  The outline Is shown



in orange with red dots and it encircles the drainage basins



of the Clinton, the Rouge, the Huron, and the Raisin Rivers.



          In addition, this map shows the location of all



of the incorporated municipalities lying within the drain-



age basins outlined here.  A legend is shown on this map



which describes the degree of treatment, the degree of col-

-------
                                                      189
lection, and treatment of ttie municipal sewage in these
municipalities.  The municipalities shown shaded in brown
have no sewer system and no formal treatment.  The munici-
palities colored in green all have primary treatment. That
is in the City of Detroit, which is colored green, there
is a primary treatment plant.
          Now to show the municipalities connected to De-
troit, or in the case of the Wayne County plants at Trenton
and Wyandotte we have shaded those tributary municipalities
in green, shading from the northeast to the northwest for
the Detroit system, and from the northwest to the northeast
for the Wayne County system.
          The municipalities tinted in pink all provide
secondary treatment.  Here again we have shaded the tribu-
tary municipalities, showing whether they go to the Wayne
County system or to nearby township or city plants.
          This map also shows the course of the St. Clair
River as it comes down into Lake St. Clair, and the outline
of Lake St. Clair and the Michigan shore of Lake St. Clair,
and the Detroit River and its discharge into Lake Erie,
and it goes down to the Michigan-Ohio line.
          We have taken the large map, the base orientation
map, and have enlarged each of the river basins in the total
area of southeastern Michigan.  This is another consideration
here.  I think to shorten this up I would just refer to one

-------
                                                      190



of these.  They are all of the same nature.  Here again



we have used the same key to show the degree of treatment



provided and whether there is a sewer system or not, but



we have also added the location of all of the industries



which discharge to the water courses within the river basin.



          In the case of the River Rouge basin we have



listed 19 industries and with numbers preceding the name



of the industrial establishment, and that is keyed in to



the location on the basin map so that where the red arrows



appear on the basin map with th$ number this would designate



the location of a specific industry.  In each of these maps



the same procedure has been followed.  All of the industries



are listed on the map with numbers, and the arrows are



placed on the rivers and water courses to show where they



discharge into the water course.



          I think with that, Mr. Chairman, and conferees,



I would like to ask Mr. Adams to brief you on Chapter I of



the report.



          THE CHAIRMAN: Thank you.  At this point I would



like to Indicate and state that there is one thing we cannot



do, I believe, which is reproduce these maps in color.  If



I can go off the record here,



          (Discussion off the record.;



          THE CHAIRMAN:  On the record.  Dr. Heustis.



          DR. HEUSTIS:  Mr. Adams.

-------
                                                      191

          STATEMENT OP MILTON P. ADAMS, EXECUTIVE

          SECRETARY, MICHIGAN WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION

          MR. ADAMS:

                       CHAPTER I

      Statutory Authority, Policies and Procedures

Statutory Authority

          Michigan's legislative effort to control water

pollution started nearly 100 years ago.  The result Is

summarized below:

          1.  Act 350, P.O. 1865	Conservation Department

          2.  Act 98, P.A. 1913	Health Department

          3.  Act 17, P.A. 1921	Conservation Department

          4.  Act 245, P.A. 1929	Stream Control Commission

          5.  Act 61, P.A. 1939	State Supervisor of Wells
                                   (Conservation Department)

          6.  Act 117, P.A. 1949,
              amending (4) above	Water Resources Commissioti

          7.  Act 219, P.A. 1949,
              amending (2) above	State Health Commissioner

          8.  Act 40, P.A. 1956
              (Drain Code)	County Drain Commissionere
                                            or
                                   Intercounty Drainage Boards

          9.  Act 306, P.A. 1927,
              as amended	County Health Departments


          No. 1  was enacted for the protection of fish and

fisheries.

          No. 2 Initiated Health Department supervision of
                                                  GPO 8E08I9-B-2

-------
                                                      192



municipal water and sewerage facilities and related de-



velopments concerned with public health.



          No. 3.  The b^sic Act creating the Conservation



Department.  This entries a broad grant of authority in



the following words found in Section 3:  "to prevent and



guard against the pollution of lakes and streams within



the state, and to enforce all laws provided for that pur-



pose with all authority granted by law."



          No. 4.  The Legislature's attempt to resolve



Health and Conservation Department differences of the late



1920's by the creation of a Stream Control Commission.  The



Act also provided for compliance under a formal notice,



hearing, and order procedure.  Unlawful pollution was defined



as the discharge to waters of the state as "any waste or



pollution of any kind that will tend to destroy fish life or



be injurious to public health."



          Section 12 of the new Act provided that it should



be construed "as ancillary to and supplementing" existing



provisions of law governing pollution of lakes and streams



"except as the same may be in direct conflict herewith."



          The Commission was further required to ascertain in



taking appropriate action whether the conditions created were



"unreasonable and against public interest in view of the ex-



isting conditions in any lake, river, stream or other waters



of the state."

-------
                                                      193
          Monthly meetings were required of the five member
Commission to consist of the Director of Conservation,
Commissioner of Health, the Highway Commissioner, the
Commissioner of Agriculture and the Attorney General.
          No. 5.  This enactment made the Director of Con-
servation the State Supervisor of Wells (for oil and gas).
Among his other duties he was authorized "to prevent waste
or damage to oil and gas, the fresh, brine and mineral
waters or to life and property."
          No. 6.  A Water Resources Commission of seven
members was created to replace the Stream Control Commission
of 1929.  To make up its membership of seven, there was
added to the four hold-over ex-offlclo members heading the
Health, Conservation, Agriculture and Highway Departments,
three Executive appointees (with Senate approval).  The
citizen members represent respectively, Industrial Manage-
ments, Municipalities and Organized Conservation Groups.
          The preservation and encouragement of member
departmental activity in this field was continued as was
authority to call upon "any officer,board, department,
school, university or other state institution for any
assistance deemed necessary to the,carrying out of this Act.
          The Commission's responsibility is further de-
fined by Attorney General's Opinion No. 1056 of September
28, 1949 holding that "the Water Resources Commission does

-------
                                                      194



not have sole and exclusive jurisdiction in all matters per-



taining to the pollution of waters of the state, including



drains."



          No. 7.  The last of a series of amendments to (2)



above strengthened the Health Department's control of plans,



construction, operation and supervision of public water sup-



ply, sewerage and sewage treatment facilities.  From the



standpoint of water pollution control one sentence of the



Act is particularly significant:  "The State Health Com-



missioner shall exercise due care to see that sewerage sys-



tems are properly planned, constructed and operated so as



to prevent unlawful pollution of the streams, lakes and



other water resources of the state."



          Authorization "to act as agent to the Stream



Control Commission on request" appears in Section 11 of



the Act.



          No. 8.  The Drainage Code, up for further amend-



ments each year, carries in Section 423 its definition of



the unlawful use of county drains and intercounty drainage



facilities for the carrying of sewage and other wastes.



Action under this law has been the least productive of pol-



lution control results of all other efforts.



          No. 9.  The basic Act providing for the establish-



ment of county and district health departments authorizes



the County Board of Health to exercise the same powers as

-------
                                                      195
conferred on boards of health of townships, villages and
cities.  On this basis the local health departments in
the area have adopted and enforce county regulations con-
trolling the installation and operation of private sewage
disposal systems.
Policies and Procedures
          Administration of the water pollution control
function in Michigan necessarily follows the division of
statutory responsibility previously indicated subject to
correlation, wherever possible, of member department inter-
ests and objectives with those of the Commission.
          While the State Health Commissioner and Water
Resources Commission and their respective supporting staffs
carry the principal burden of water pollution control,
this section will attempt to list the activities of all
member agencies in this field including pertinent inter-
relationships .
            The Water Resources Commission
          1.  Fosters the policy of each member agency as
well as local governmental units and industries doing their
utmost to so control waste substances as to prevent unlaw-
ful pollution as defined in Act 245, P.A. 1929, as amended.
          2.  Receives complaints of pollution and acts
on reported findings.
          3,  Receives statements for new or increased use

-------
                                                      196



of waters of the state for waste disposal and acts on Order



restrictions recommended by staff, except in case of mun-



icipal or other uses solely involving public health where



the Commission relies on Health Department action.



          4.  Schedules and conducts preliminary information



conferences as well as conferences "to show cause."



          5»  Orders preparation and adopts Notice of Deter-



mination and Hearing for problems not corrected or oorrectibXe



through staff approach and effort; takes like action where



necessary and when requested to support a member agency's



efforts.



          6.  Holds Statutory Hearings on proposed Orders.



          7.  Adopts Final Order setting date for compliance



following date for submission of plans for approval:



            (a) to State Health Commissioner for municipal



                sewage treatment.



            (b) to Chief Engineer, Water Resources Commission!,



                for industrial waste treatment.



          8.  Takes appropriate action on staff reports of



failure to comply with previously adopted Orders by declaring



default and referring problem to Attorney General for en-



forcement .



          9.  Passes on budget requests and proposed staff



programs following legislative appropriation (with or with-



out Federal program grant funds).

-------
                                                      197
           10.  Determines priority of one  eligible mun-
 icipal project over another to qualify for Federal con-
 struction  grant assistance.
           11.  Contributes toward the State's share of
 the U.S. Geological Survey program for stream gaging and
 lake level records.
           12.  Contracts with universities for conduct of
 research projects involving water resource evaluation.
  Water Resources Commission Staff (Pollution Control)
           1.  Conducts field investigations to secure basic
 information and evidence, which includes pollution surveys
 to evaluate magnitude and extent of pollution problems.
           2.  Explores and evaluates polluting effects of
wastes from new types of industries.
           3.  Receives and processes statements of new or
 increased  use of waters of the state for waste disposal pur-
poses, conducts related investigations and recommends ap-
propriate  waste restrictions to the Commission.
          4.  Investigates pollution complaints and reported
fish or wildfowl mortalities.
          3.  Develops recommendations on necessary degree
of treatment or time for compliance upon request of Com-
mission.
          6.  Reviews and approves or rejects plans for
industrial waste treatment or control facilities.

-------
                                                      198



          7.  Makes regular inspections and performance



surveys on existing industrial waste control facilities.



          8.  Counsels with management on industrial waste



treatment or disposal problems.



          9.  Reviews and takes appropriate action on basis



of industrial waste treatment plant operating reports.



        10.  Acts on matters referred from the Michigan



Department of Health.



         11.  Performs work required in carrying out State



functions under provisions of the Federal Water Pollution



Control Act.



         12.  Cooperates with Federal and other State agen-



cies in matters related to water pollution.



         13.  Provides Department of Conservation with



stream survey information that might affect future fish



plantings.



         14.  Represents the State's or Agency's interests



at conferences and on committees concerned with water



pollution and water resource matters.




         15.  Chief Engineer represents the interests of the



Commission on the Advisory Board to the International Joint



Commission.



         16.  Patrols the entire Detroit River and the lower



Rouge River.  This program was initiated in August, 1960



and has been continued on a routine basis since that time.

-------
                                                      199
During the summer months, patrols are made twice weekly as
well as Immediately following storms which produce surface
runoff.  During the colder months, when the need for pro-
tection of migratory waterfowl becomes critical, patrol
frequency Is Increased to every other day.  As long as
weather permits, patrols are made by means of a radio-
equipped powerboat.  At other times, observations are lim-
ited to those made by automobile at vantage points along
the shore.  Airplane patrols are relied upon to supplement
shore patrols and for making emergency Inspections when time
Is a critical factor.
          Patrol personnel keeps a log of all observations
and copies are later distributed to the Departments of
Health and Conservation.  Observations of unusual or ob-
jectionable waste discharges or river conditions are re-
ported Immediately by radio or telephone to Water Resources
Commission District Headquarters at Pointe Houillee and the
District Engineer in turn contacts the offender and initiates
whatever follow-up investigation may be indicated.
          As of March 1, 1962 the patrol program had been
in operation for nineteen months during which time a total
of 187 patrols were made.  Following is a summary by years,
of the number of patrols made by boat, automobile or air-
plane:

-------
                                                       200
                               Boat   Automobile   Airplane Tota]
 Aug. 1,  I960 - Dec.  31,  I960    49        l          2       52
 Jan. 1,  1961 - Dec.  22,  1961   108       13          i       122
 Jan. 1,  1962 - Mar.  1,  1962              n          2       13
          The  number of  pollution incidents  found and  cor-
 rected during  this period  total  112.

          State Health Commissioner  (Member)
                           and
   Division  of  Engineering,  Michigan Department  of  Health,
       Section  of Sewerage and Sewage Treatment
                (Water Pollution  Control):
          1.  Reviews, approves  or rejects plans submitted
 for  new municipal systems  or changes in existing ones.
          2.  As agent for the Commission, reviews, approves
 or rejects plans submitted for all new sewerage systems or
 changes in existing ones, other  than municipal.
          3»  Issues or withholds issuance of construction
 permits,
          4.  Counsels with officials of municipalities as
 to the collection and treatment  of sewage.  This activity
 is supplemented and strengthened by programs of local health
departments to control the installation of private sewage
disposal systems.
          5.  Consults, confers with and assists staff of
Water Resources Commission in all phases of activities related

-------
                                                      201
to sewage treatment.
          6.  Conducts an educational program to foster and
encourage the construction, utilization and effective
management of adequate sewage collection and treatment
works «
          7.  Conducts inspections to determine that con-
struction conforms to approved plans.
          8.  Makes periodic inspections and exercises gen-
eral supervisory control over plant personnel to assure
effective operation of sewerage works at municipalities,
institutions, trailer parks, schools and hospitals.
          9.  Trains and certifies the competency of sewage
p lant ope rat ors.
         10.  Reviews and takes appropriate action on basis
of monthly plant operating reports.
         11.  With aid of mobile laboratory (furnished and
operated in part by Federal funds) conducts on-the-site
municipal plant performance evaluations.
         12.  Orders changes in physical facilities or
their operation to assure that sewage shall not be "po-
tentially prejudicial to the public health."
         13.  Reports to Commission when municipal facility
has been completed substantially in accordance with ap-
proved plans and specifications.
         14.  Refers appropriate cases to Water Resources
Commission for action.

-------
                                                      202



         15.  Director, Division of Engineering, represents



the interests of the State Health Commissioner on the Ad-



visory Board to the International Joint Commission.








           Director of Conservation (Member)



                          and



     Department of Conservation (Water Pollution)



          Following organization of employed staff of



Stream Control Commission late in 1930, this Department



withdrew from its former active participation in general



pollution control activity except as follows:



          1.  Its Law Enforcement Division presses occasional



attempts to secure convictions under Act 350, P.A. 1865.



         2.  It organizes and has conducted active oil



field patrol and developed highly effective means of brine



conservation and oil pollution prevention since 1939.



          3.  Conservation Officer field assistance has



continued to support Water Resources Commission staff



efforts to control pollution.



          4.  The Department has shared the services of



its Assistant Attorney General to support the pollution



control activities of the Health Department and Water Re-



sources Commission.  Since November, 1961, Federal funds



have made possible part-time employment of a Special



Assistant Attorney General by the Commission.

-------
                                                      203
          5.  Institute of Fisheries Research at Ann Arbor,
a part of the Department of Conservation, has over many
years made its laboratory facilities and scientific knovl-
 3dge available to provide Commission staff with fish toler-
ances and other information necessary to fish propagation
and development.
          6.  The Department is the single largest contrib-
utor to the State's share of the U.S. Geological Survey
program of stream flow and lake levels investigation.
          7.  The Department looks to the Commission and
Health Department to improve the quality of water at
Sterling State Park and Pointe Mouillee just as early as
possible.
          8.  Governor Swainson has recently assigned the
Department the task of conducting a broad State recreational
study and to prepare a recreation plan.  Water quality in-
formation coupled with unrelenting effort to Improve such
conditions where necessary by the Commission and Health
Department is of utmost importance to this program.
          9.  Docking and headquarters accommodations pro-
vided Water Resources Commission staff and boat at Pointe
Mouillee.
            Director of Agriculture (Member)
                           and
       Department of Agriculture (Water Pollution)

-------
                                                      204



          While possessing no officially direct  responsi-



bility for the fcontrol of water pollution, the Director



of Agriculture finds himself in a position to view the



problem from several vantage points.



          He has on occasion had to carry the pollution com-



plaints of aggrieved farmers before the Commission.  He is



also ex-officio Chairman of all Intercounty Drainage Boards.



These are frequently involved in drain pollution matters.



Section 423, Act 40, P.A. 1956, defines the unlawful use



of county  drains and intercounty drainage facilities.  For



some years past it has been "unlawful to connect sewage or



other waste to county or intercounty drains except with the



written approval" of the appropriate authority.   Yet offen-



sive conditions continue to appear in too many locations.



In the absence of a petition to take action to correct misuse



of county drains, the individual commissioner or intercounty



board claims inability to act.  The Water Resources Com-



mission may file the necessary petition with the Drain



Commissioner on a showing of injury to public health certi-



fied by the State Health Commissioner.  With one possible



exception, however, such petitions have failed in the past



to bring results.  It follows, therefore, that attempts under



Drainage Code to provide outlets for sewage or waste and



land drainage in the same facilities without creating odor



nuisance or unlawful pollution, have not been successful.

-------
                                                      205



          The Director of Agriculture has official con-



nections with several farm product promotion groups.  The



processing of these products for market, gives rise to



sewage or waste whether milk, apples, peaches, cherries,



livestock, animal hides, or pulpwood are involved.  Such



wastes comprise a substantial percentage of the total num-



ber of industrial waste problems with which the Commission



and staff must necessarily deal.








          State Highway Commissioner (Member)



                           and



          Highway Department (Water Pollution)



          While his Department interests are for the most



part in other phases of the State's water resources program,



the Commission looks to the State Highway Commissioner



through his authorized deputy to prevent misuse of many



thousands of miles of Department-owned drains.



          State Highway drains, open and closed, invite



"midnight" and other connections to receive septic tank



drainage, sewage and industrial wastes—always with the



same end result.



          The State Highway Commissioner makes a substantial



annual contribution to the State's portion of the U. S.



Geological Survey program of stream gaging.

-------
                                                      206



                  Appointive Members



          The appointive citizen members of the Commission



have three year staggered terms of office.  Two of them



represent the most commonly encountered sources of waste



or pollution which comes from certain industries and all



municipalities.  Conservation groups and interests, on the



other hand, are ever seeking an improved natural water qual-



ity in the best interest of fish and wildlife, recreation



and other uses of waters of the State.



          I want to put this on the record at the request



of the Chief Engineer.  Mr. Clarke, speaking yesterday



about the work of the United States Geological Survey —



          THE CHAIRMAN:  It should be emphasized you are



talking about Mr. Clarke of the Geological Survey and not



Mr. Clark  of the Public Health Service.



          MR. ADAMS:  When the Clarke of the United States



Geological Survey appeared, he mentioned 7>000 basic data



stations.  I think we account for about 200 of them, and



this gives our distribution.  I would like to submit this



table.



          Thank you very much.



          (The table referred to is as follows:)

-------
                                                       20?
                U.S.G.S. Program 1961-62

 Water Resources Commission
      Cash (surface water)
      Services (quality of water)

 Highway Department
      Cash (surface water)

 Conservation Department
      Cash
           Surface  water
           Ground water
           Quality  of  water

      Services
           Surface  water
           Ground water

     Total State

Local contributions
     Cash
           Surface  water
           Ground water
           Quality

     Services
           Ground water

     Total local

     Total non-Federal

Federal

     U.S.G.S.
           Surface water, matching
          Surface water, unrestricted
          Ground water, matching
          Ground water, unrestricted
          Quality of water, matching

     U. S. Corps of Engineers
          Surface water
     U.S. Fish and  Wildlife
          Surface water
          Ground water
     Federal Power Commission
     Total Federal
 $14,300
   3,600
   8,400
 31,630.63
 19,038.65
    500.00
 10,500
  7,000
 43,325
 15,100
  3,350
  1,400
108,155.63
 20,100
 42,538.65
    735
 14,275

  1,540
  3,600
    900
           $94,969
            63,175

           158,144
          $199,293
                                                 GPO 820819—B-3

-------
                                                        208
          DR. HEUSTIS:  Mr. Oeming, will you continue?
          MR. OEMINQ:  At this time, with a very brief
introduction, Mr. John Vogt, the Director of the Division of
Engineering, Michigan Department of Health, and Donald M.
Pierce, the Chief of the Section of Sewerage and sewage
Treatment of the Division of Engineering, will present a
Joint review and brief of Chapter II on Municipal Sewage
Collection and Treatment.
          STATEMENT OP JOHN E. VOGT, DIRECTOR OF THE
          DIVISION OF ENGINEERING, MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT
          OF HEALTH, AND DONALD M. PIERCE, CHIEF OF THE
          SECTION OF SEWERAGE AND  SEWAGE  TREATMENT
          OF THE DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
          MR. VOGT:  Mr. Chairman, Conferees, and ladies
and Gentlemen:  For the benefit of the reporter, I am Mr.
Vogt.  My colleague is Mr. Pierce.
        CHAPTER II.  MUNICIPAL SEWAGE COLLECTION AND TREATMENT
          The river basins of the Southeastern Michigan
region extend into Macomb, Oakland, Wayne, Washtenaw, Lenawee
and Monroe Counties.  The region contains a total of 104
incorporated villages and cities.
          Twenty-six municipalities with a total population
of 3*1*686 have no sewer systems but rely on individual house-
hold disposal methods.  The largest municipality in this
group is Novi on the upper reaches of the Huron River with

-------
                                                       209
a population of 6,390.

          The renainlng 78 municipalities, together with

20 townships which are served either wholly or in part by

sewers, total 98 governmental units having sewer systems.

All of these governmental units provide treatment in degrees

varying from primary settling type plants to secondary treat-

ment by biological oxidation using trickling filters or the

activated sludge process.  Chlorination of the effluents is

practiced at all plants except one, at least during the

period May 15 to September 15 of each year.  The waste

assimilating capacity of the receiving waters and the preven-

tion of unlawful pollution defined by state statute have

dictated the selection of degree of treatment throughout the

region.  Accordingly, plants providing secondary treatment

predominate on the tributary streams while primary treatment

plants are situated along or immediately adjacent to the

shoreline of the Detroit River.

          Treatment of the sewage from the 98 governmental

units is provided in 44 plants.  In some instances one plant

treats the sewage from a single governmental unit or a sec-

tion thereof.  In others, a plant serves as an area facility

receiving the sewage from a number of governmental units

under contractual arrangements made either directly with the

city owning the plant or through a county or a contracting

agency created under State law.

-------
                                                        210
          The following sections of this chapter give
detailed information on the type and extent of the sewer
systems, the disposal and treatment methods in effect at all
governmental units within the region.  It presents the
opinions of the staff of the two State agencies on the
adequacy of the systems and methods of disposal or treatment
in preventing unlawful pollution as defined in the State
statutes.
                       Detroit River
          Waste discharges into the Detroit' River from
municipalities consist of shoreline installations and those
discharging indirectly through the Rouge River and Ecorse
Creek.  These sources may be categorized as the treated
effluents from sewage treatment plants, untreated sewage and
intermittent overflows from combined sewer systems.  Along
the shoreline are three major sewage treatment plants:  one
owned by the City of Detroit near the mouth of the Rouge
River; the plant at Wyandotte owned by Wayne County; and the
Wayne County plant at Trenton.  On Grosse lie a small treat-
ment plant serving a subdivision discharges to the river.
Other sewered areas on the island are connected to septic
tank facilities which also discharge to the river.
          The combined sewer systems of all of the shoreline
communities from St. Clair Shores to Trenton discharge
mixtures of sewage and storm water during periods of surface

-------
                                                        211
runoff.  One shoreline community, Grosse Pointe, has a
separate sanitary sewer system.  With the notable exception

of Grosse Pointe Woods, interceptor facilities are designed
and operated so as to retain for treatment up to about 325
gallons per capita from combined sewers.

          Wastes originating in the Rouge River consist
primarily of the effluent from the Dearborn Sewage Treatment

Plant and the raw sewage bypassed at this plant.  Overflows
from combined sewer systems of Detroit, Dearborn and other

upstream communities during periods of runoff also contribute
to the pollutional load on the Detroit River.

          To the above may be added direct discharges from
homes, either untreated or as effluent from septic tanks.

                          Detroit
          The city has a population of 1,670,144.  Virtually
all occupied properties are connected to the combined sewer
system.

          Pollution control was established In 1940 when a

primary type sewage treatment plant with effluent disinfec-
tion was completed.  Two major sanitary interceptors were

completed at that time.  One, known as the Detroit River

Interceptor, runs parallel with the Detroit River, extending
from the sewage treatment plant to the northeastern boundary

of the city at Grosse Pointe Park,  The other, known as
the Northwest Interceptor, runs parallel with the Rouge

-------
                                                        212
River.  The first section, constructed at that time, extended
a short distance northwesterly from the sewage treatment
plant and was known as the Oakwood Section.  These two inter-
ceptors, having a combined capacity of about 2,000 cubic
feet per second, were designed to transport sewage to the
treatment plant from an ultimate population of 4 million.
Subsequently, the Northwest Interceptor was constructed in
stages as a major branch of the Oakwood Interceptor extending
northwesterly to serve the northwestern areas.
          The sewage treatment plant was so designed as to
be readily expanded in stages to provide treatment for an
ultimate population of 4 mflllon and flow rates of 2,000
cubic feet per second.  Additions have been built to meet
the needs of an expanding service area, the most recent of
which were completed last year.  Other improvements are
currently scheduled for construction.
          The interceptor system and sewage treatment plant
were so designed and constructed that the city may provide
service to a large district outside of the city by accepting
sewage at or near its corporate limits and delivering it to
its treatment works.  This district today includes 47
communities with a connected population including Detroit of
over 2.5 million.  These communities, whose sewerage facili-
ties are described in this report, are grouped by service
areas in Table 1.

-------
                                                        213
                         Table I

            Communities in Detroit Service Area For

            Sewage Treatment - Presently Connected

I.  Detroit River Interceptor District

    A.  Directly Connected to Detroit

          Center Line              Grosse Pointe Park

          Grosse Pointe            Hamtramck

          Grosse Pointe Farms      Highland Park

    B.  Connected by Wayne Count Metropolitan Sewerage and

        Sewage Disposal System (Northeast Interceptor District)

          Grosse Pointe Shores     East Detroit

          Grosse Pointe Woods      Rosevllle

          Harper Woods             St. Clair Shores

    C.  Connected by Oakland County (Southeast Oakland

        County Sewage Disposal System)

          Berkley                  Huntington Woods

          Beverly Hills            Madison Heights

           (portion)               Oak Park

          Birmingham               Pleasant Ridge

           (portion)

          Clawson                  Royal Oak

          Ferndale                 Royal Oak Township

          Hazel Park               Troy
                                      (Portion)

-------
II.  Northwest Interceptor District

    A.  Directly Connected to Detroit

          Allen Park               Farmington

            (north portion)        Melvindale

          Dearborn

            (east portion)

    B.  Connected by Wayne County Metropolitan Sewerage and

        Sewage Disposal System (Middle Rouge District)

          Dearborn Township        Northville

            (portion)              Northville Township

          Garden City
                                   Plymouth

          Livonia
                                   Plymouth Township
          Nankin Township
                                   Bedford Township

    C.  Connected by Oakland County  (Evergreen-Farmington

        Interceptor Districts)

          Beverly Hills            Lathrup Village

            (portion)
                                   Pontiac Township
          Birmingham

            (portion)              Southfield

                                     (portion)
          Bloomfield Hills
                                   Troy

          Bloomfield Township         (portion)

          Farmington Township      West Bloomfield Township

          Keego HSrbor

-------
                                                        215
          In addition to the communities  listed above, the
City of Detroit contracted in the fall of 1961 to provide
sewage treatment services to the following communities
through its Northwest Interceptor sewer system by connection
to be completed by July, 1962.
            Dearborn               Nankin Township
             (west side)              (portion)
            Inkster                Wayne
          Adequacy of the existing facilities to control
pollution and provide the requisite protection prescribed
by existing Michigan statutes is under continuing considera-
tion and evaluation by the Michigan Department of Health
and Water Resources Commission.
          The sewage treatment facilities currently in
operation are capable of providing that degree of treatment
normally associated with primary sedimentation with mechanical
sludge removal and effluent disinfection  for the presently
connected population.  An intensive laboratory study con-
ducted by the plant operating staff on bacteriological
control of the plant effluent, involving  some adjustment in
chlorination methods and testing procedures, will provide
significantly improved bacteriological controls to be exer-
cised this year.
          In recent years and yet today large quantities of
raw and poorly treated sewage are discharged by the City of

-------
                                                       216
Dearborn and the Wayne County Metropolitan Sewerage and

Sewage Disposal System in addition to many large and varied

industrial discharges into the Rouge and Detroit Rivers in

waters also affected by the waste discharges of the City

of Detroit.  The effects of these multiple discharges on

water quality for long distances downriver are to a very

significant extent additive, cumulative, and interrelated.

          No reasonably accurate determination of the

separate effect of discharges from the two major systems of

Detroit and Wayne County can be made until the control

measures currently planned and under way at Detroit, Dearborn

and the Wayne County system have been effectuated.

          MR. PIERCE:  Areas Served by Detroit

          Areas served by the Detroit sewerage system lie in

Wayne, Oakland and Macomb Counties within the drainage basins

of the Rouge River, Clinton River, Detroit River, Ecorse

Creek and Lake St. Clalr.  As previously Indicated In Table I

and detailed in Table II, 10 communities or portions thereof

are connected directly to the Detroit system.  All other

communities are located in areas served by Wayne and Oakland

County agencies which deliver sewage to the Detroit system

by contractual arrangement with each community and Detroit.

    Communities Directly Connected

          The sewer systems and sewered population of communi-

ties connected directly to Detroit are summarized in Table II.

-------
                                                         217

 The present connected population In these areas Is estimated

 at about 200,000.

                        Table II
Community
Allen Park
(north portion)
Center Line
Pop.
(I960)
5,000
10,164
% of Pop
Sewered
SO
j**
100
.Type of
Sewers
San
Comb.
Combined Sewer
Overflows Dis-
charge To

Clinton River
Dearborn
  (east portion)
56,000
Farmington            6,881

Grosse Pointe         6,631

Orosse Pointe Farms   12,172

Grosse Pointe Park    10,457

Hamtrarack             34,137
Highland Park
38,063
Melvindale           13,089

*Currently being connected to
   100


    90

   100

   100

   100

   100



   100



   100

Detroit
       (Bear Creek)

Comb.  Rouge River


Comb.  Rouge River

San.   	

Comb.  Lake St. Clair

Comb.  Lake St. Clair

Comb.  Completely
       intercepted to
       Detroit

Comb.  Completely
       intercepted
       to Detroit
                    San.
                   See also Clinton
                   River Basin
County Sewerage Districts

          The sewered population and types of sewer systems

in districts in Wayne, Oakland and Macomb Counties connected

to the Detroit sewerage system are summarized in Table III.

-------
                       Table III
                                                        218
County Sewerage Dis-
         tricts
                       River
                       Basin
Est. Sewered
    Pop.
Type of Sewers
                                               Largely san.
                                               Half san. -
                                                 half comb.
Wayne County

  Rouge Valley (Middle Rouge      275,000
    Rouge Section)     River

  Northeast Inter-     Lake St.   225,000
    ceptor (Includes    Clair
    South Macomb Sani-
    tary District)

Oakland County

  Evergreen-Parmington Rouge      100,000
  Districts            River

  Southeast Oakland    Clinton    275,000
  Co. Sewage Disposal  River
  District
                                               Largely san.


                                               Largely comb.
Wayne County - Rouge Valley District (Middle Rouge Section)

          The pollution control facilities provided by the

county in this district consisted originally in 19^0 of sev-

eral sections each physically separated from the other.  One

portion was known as the Middle Rouge System and the other as

tikeMichigan Avenue Interceptor (now called the Lower Rouge

Branch - see Rouge River).  About 19^0, two interceptor

sewers were completed and placed in operation.  Each termi-

nated at a new treatment plant discharging Into the Middle

Branch of the Rouge River.  In 195^ the plants were abandoned

and the interceptor sewers were joined and extended to the

Detroit Northwest Interceptor so as to deliver all of the

-------
                                                        219
sewage from the sewered areas of the following communities

to Detroit.

          The communities served by these facilities are

identified in Table IV.  Present connected population is

estimated at about 275,000.

                         Table IV
Community
 Pop.  % of Pop. Type of
(I960)  Sewered  Sewers
             C omb ined Sewe r
             Over-Flows Dis-
               charge to
Dearborn Town-   40,000
 ship (North
   portion)

Garden City      32,01?

Livonia          66,702

Nankin Township  67,183

Northville        3,967

Plymouth          8,766

Plymouth Township 8,364

Redford Township 71,276
           90
Largely San.
100
QO
yu
fin
ou
on
yu
i nn
1UU
cr\
50
100
Largely comb.
jLicirge j.y son .
jjcirge j.y BCUII .
Qo v>
oan.
Con
Ocul .
Qort
oan.
Comb.
Rouge ft




Rouge R
          MR. VOGT:  The sewer systems existing in this area
prior to 1940 were largely of the combined type.  During

the last 10 years all communities in this area have  developed

sanitary sewer systems in newly sewered areas and have con-

verted systems from combined to separate type In certain

built-up areas.

          Existing interceptor facilities do not have sufficient

-------
                                                         220



 capacity and are inadequate to control local health hazards and



 provide the requisite protection prescribed by Michigan



 statutes.  Inadequacies of the system were officially recog-



 nized by the county in 1956.  In December, 1958 the Michigan



 Department of Health, following a series of meetings with



 officials and committees of the county having official responi-



sibility for the system, notified the county and the commun-



i itles in this service district of the deficiencies of the



 system.  An agreement was reached by the department and the



 county's agent, the Road Commission, to enlarge and improve the



 system with completion of all work by March 1, 1962.  Although



 the need for the scheduled improvements was generally recog-



 nized and undisputed, the communities could not agree on the



 method of financing or the division of costs.  Accordingly,



 in June, 1959 the State Health Commissioner notified all



 communities in the district that henceforth, until con-



 struction of the needed facilities was assured, no sewer



 extensions would be approved.  Continued failure to proceed



 with the required construction prompted the State Health



 Commissioner in June, 1961 to order all communities in the



 district to desist from adding any more connections to ex-



 isting sewers.



           In December, 1961 construction contracts were let



 for Improvements to this system sufficient to provide



 capacity adequate for the 1980 projected population.  This

-------
                                                        221

work Involves a relief interceptor and a new section of an

interceptor to deliver flow from this area to Detroit together

with the total flow from the Lower Rouge Branch.

          The work on this project has been scheduled so as to

provide temporary relief for present flows by July, 1962 with

completion of the total project by December, 1963.  When this

construction was assured in August, 1961 the Health Depart-

ment removed its restrictions on sewer construction and use

in this area.

 Wayne County - Northeast Interceptor District

          Pollution control facilities consist of an inter-

ceptor sewer and pumping station to collect sewage and trans-

port it to Detroit for treatment from the South Macomb

Sanitary District and three Wayne County communities.  The

summary in Table V  identifies the communities and their

sewer systems.  Present connected population is estimated at

about 225,000.

                          Table V

                                                Combined Sewer
                  Pop.   % of Pop.   Type of    Overflows Dis-
  Community	(i960)   Sewered    Sewers	charge to

*South Macomb San.165,000    100    San.  - 40$  Lake St.Glair
    Dist.                           Comb. - 60$
Grosse Pointe Shores 2,301   100    Comb.        Lake St.Clair
Grosse Pointe Woods 18,580   100    Comb.        Lake St.Clair
Harper Woods        19*995   100    San.         	

*See South Macomb Sanitary District, pages 22 to 23.

-------
                                                        222




          Overloading of interceptor and pumping facilities



by 1956 prompted the State Health Commissioner to impose



restrictions on sewer extensions in this service area in a



manner similar fco that taken in other Wayne County areas



(see Rouge Valley District above).  When relief facilities



providing adequate capacity were placed under construction



in the spring of 1961 these restrictions were removed.



These facilities, when completed this year, will have ade-



quate capacity for ultimate development of this service area.



Other work in this area to control pollution is noteworthy.



The facilities for retention and treatment of combined sewer



overflows for Grosse Pointe Woods and Harper Woods (see Lake



St. Glair - Milk River Drainage System) completed last year



provide a large measure of control for these wastes.  A



similar project is proposed by communities in the South



Macomb Sanitary District.



South Macomb Sanitary District



          In 1943 the County of Macomb completed construction



of an interceptor sewer and related control facilities for



interception of sewage from the 9 Mile Drain and Martin Drain



which were utilized as major combined sewer outlets for the



following communities:  East Detroit, Roseville, St. Glair



Shores, Warren and Center Line.  Overflows from the combined



sewers and drains discharged to Lake St. Clair (see Lake St.



Glair - South Maoomb Sanitary District).  The sewage inter-

-------
                                                        223

cepted from these drains was delivered to the Wayne County

Sanitary Interceptor which transported the sewage to Detroit

for treatment (see Wayne County Metropolitan Sewerage and

Sewage Disposal System - Northeast Interceptor District; also

Detroit - Table I, Section 1A).

          In 19^8, the South Macomb Sanitary District was

created to acquire and operate this interceptor system by

contractual agreement among the communities served by it.

The service district today consists principally of East

Detroit, St. Glair Shores and Roseville as shown in Table VI.

Total population connected to the system is estimated at

about 165,000.

          (The City of Warren has provided its own treatment

facilities and Center Line is being connected directly to

Detroit.)



                        Table VI
                                      Type    Combined Sewer
    Community         Pop.   % of Pop.  of    Overflows Dis-
	(196Q)   Sewered Sewers  charged to
East Detroit         ^5,956     100   Comb.   Lake St. Clair

*Roseville           40,195     100   Comb.   Lake St. Clair

St. Clair Shores     76,657      10   Comb.   Lake St. Clair
                                 70   Sep.    	

*Approximately 10,000 additional population connected to
Clinton Township sewerage system.

-------
                                                         224
           Existing pollution control facilities are  not  ade-
 quate to control local health hazards and  provide  the  requi-
site protection prescribed by Michigan statutes. These inad-
 equacies were established by the Water Resources Commission
 in 195@ when statutory proceedings were instituted against  the
 communities comprising the district«  In 1960 the  communities
 formally stipulated to provide improvements to the system by
 September 1963*  This work is to consist of increased  control
 of combined sewer overflows and higher rates of interception
 to the Wayne County Northeast Interceptor for treatment.  The
 latter is to be completed this year.

           MR. PIERCE:
 Oakland County - Evergreen and Farmington Interceptor  Districts
           The Evergreen-^Farming ton Interceptor Districts were
 established In 1957 under the provisions of the County De-
 partment of Public Works statute.  Construction of a system
 of interceptor sewers, major trunk sewers and related  facil-
 ities to collect sewage from the communities listed  in Table
 VII was commenced In 1959.  The sewage from this area  has
 been delivered to Detroit for treatment since July,  I960
 (see Detroit - Table I, Section lie).  Total population
 presently connected to the interceptors is estimated at  about
 100,000.
           (Table VII is  as follows:)

-------
Table VII
Community
Beverly Hills (portion)
Bloomfield Hills
Bloomfield Townshin
Fanninfft on TownshiD

Lathrup Village
Pont iac Townshin fnoi*fcion^
Southfield
Troy (portion)
West Bl cornfield Twn.
Pop. #of Pop.
(i960) Sewered
5,000 100
20.000 100

22 R30 RO
20
26 6Q2 ^0
2 761 QO
3,556 100
Q OQl "^
y , v;» *• j
"31. SOI 70
•2 000 7S
lii.QQ/i 2iO
Type of Combined Sewer Over-
Sewers flows Discharge To
Comb. Rouge River


Comb. Rouge River

Comb. Rouge River


San _•-- 	
                                                        ro
                                                        ro

-------
                                                       226



          These facilities with provision for treatment by




Detroit were constructed in compliance with Orders of the



Water Resources Commission of 1952, affirmed by decree of



the Circuit Court, to abate pollution of the Rouge River.



          Until connection was made to the Evergreen Inter-



ceptor, the sewage from Birmingham, Bloomfleld Hills, Bloom-



field Township and that portion of Troy in the Rouge Basin



had been treated at the overloaded sewage treatment plant at



Birmingham.  Sewage from several other areas was discharged



directly to the Rouge River.



          Rates of interception from the combined sewered areas



of Birmingham, Beverly Hills and Bloomfield Township are



regulated at about 10 times the normal dry weather flow



rate.  Studies are in progress to determine the adequacy of



these controls.  Adjustments in these controls are to be



made as required for adequate protection.



          The combined sewer system of Lathrup Village is



to be converted to a separate system with connection of the



sanitary sewer system to the Evergreen Interceptor.  This



action is in conformity with the Circuit Court Decree of



1961 enforcing an Order of the Water Resources Commission.



          When these adjustments in local facilities are



completed, adequate pollution control will be established in



these districts.

-------
                                                       22?
Southeast Oakland County Sewage Disposal System
          The County of Oakland since 1943 has built and
maintained a sewerage system consisting of an interceptor
sewer and pumping facilities which deliver sewage to Detroit
from the 13 communities located in Southeastern Oakland
County for treatment and disposal.  The communities served
by the system are listed in Table VIII.  Total population
presently connected is estimated at about 275,000.
                     Table VIII
Community
Berkley
Beverly Hills (portion)
Birmingham (east portion)
Clawson
Ferndale
Hazel Park
Hunt ing ton Woods
Madison Heights
Oak Park
Pleasant Ridge
Royal Oak
Royal Oak Township
Troy (portion)
Pop.
(I960)
23,275
3,633
5,525
14,795
31,347
25,631
8,746 "
21,343
36,632
3,807
80,612
8,147
8,000
% of Pop.
Sewered
100
100
100
70
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
40

-------
                                                       228



          The combined sewer systems of these communities



discharge into three major county drains, built originally



as surface water drains.  Prior to 19^3 the entire contents



of these drains including all of the wastes from this area



were discharged into Red Run, a branch of the Clinton River,



improved as an intercounty drain.



          When the interceptor sewer and pumping station



were built in 19^3, all dry weather flow and some storm



water was intercepted for treatment, but in recent years



even the dry weather flow has exceeded the capacity of the



interceptor, resulting in some overflow to Red Run.



          Inadequacies of the existing system of drains



and sanitary Interceptor facilities are two-fold.  Lack



of capacity in the local combined sewers and county drains



causes flooding of basements and streets with mixtures of



sewage and storm water; and lack of capacity in the county



interceptor sewer results in excessive overflows to Red Run.



Both of these deficiencies create a menace to public health



and constitute violations of Michigan  statutes.  These de-



ficiencies have been officially recognized by the communities,



the county and the state regulatory agencies since about  1951.



          In 1952 the Water Resources  Commission held a



conference with the county and the communities served by  the



system to consider deficiencies In facilities.  In 1953 the



Michigan Department of Health alerted  responsible local

-------
                                                       229



officials to the need for building relief facilities.



Accordingly, the County Drain Commissioner as agent for the



county authorized the preparation of plans for construction



of both relief sewers and pollution control facilities.



Although the need for the planned facilities was generally



recognized and undisputed, the communities could not ggree



on the division of costs.  When in 1957 very little progress



had been made, the Michigan Department of Health formally



ordered the communities in the area and the county to con-



struct these facilities.  Continuing disagreement over



cost apportionment greatly delayed the project, as litigation



in both Circuit and Supreme Courts extended over a five year



period, terminating in the fall of 1961 with resumption of



proceedings to finance and build the facilities.



          Relief sewer facilities are currently under con-



struction.  A new interceptor coupled with facilities for



control of overflows from combined sewers, both adequate



for ultimate development of the area, are expected to be



under construction this year.



          All of the sewage from this area together with



the retained storm water will be delivered to Detroit for



treatment.  The excess, not so Intercepted, will be dis-



charged to Red  Run.



          MR. VOGT:



Wayne County Metropolitan Sewerage and Sewage Disposal System

-------
                                                       230




          The County of Wayne since 1939 has built and main-



tained a system of interceptor sewers, major trunk sewers and



sewage treatment works serving the majority of the sewered



area of the county with the notable but not exclusive ex-



ception of Dearborn, Melvindale, Detroit and those commun-



ities entirely or substantially surrounded by Detroit.  (The



Northeast Interceptor District and Rouge Valley District,



which are connected to Detroit for treatment, have been dis-



cussed above as a part of the Detroit service area.)



          The original system completed in 1939-^0 included



an interceptor sewer terminating at the sewage treatment plant}



located at Wyandotte to serve several communities in the



area generally south of Detroit.  Another interceptor and



treatment plant were built to serve the Cisy of Trenton.



Wyandotte District (also known as Downriver District)



          Pollution control facilities consist of a sewage



treatment plant of the primary type with effluent disin-



fection and an interceptor sewer in combination with a



county drain for collecting sewage from local community



systems and delivering same to this plant.



          The following summary  identifies the communities



or portions of communities served by these facilities.



Connected population is estimated at 275,000.



          (Table IX is as follows:)

-------
Table  IX
Community
Pop.
(I960)
Allen Park (south portion) 37,052
Dearborn Township (south portion] 39,809
Ecorse 17,328

Lincoln Park
River Rouge
Rivervlew
Southgate
Taylor Township
Trenton (north portion)
Wyandotte

53,933
18,147
7,237
29,404
49,658
1,000
43,549
% of Pop.
Sewered
90
100
100

100
100
85
80
70
100
100
Type of
Sewers
Comb.
San.
Comb.

Comb.
Comb.
Comb. - 7O#
Sep. - 30#
Comb.
Sep.
Comb.
Comb.
Combined Sewer Over-
flows Discharge To
Ecorse Creek
Ecorse Creek -
Detroit River
Ecorse Creek
Rouge River
Hun ting ton Drain
Detroit River
Detroit River
Detroit River
                                                          ro
                                                          CO

-------
                                                     232



         The local sewer systems of the communities are



largely of the combined sewer type with overflows discharging



into Ecorse Creek, Rouge River and the Detroit River during



runoff periods.  Two major county drain systems, the LeBlanc



Drain and No. 5 Drain, are utilized as combined sewers to pro-



vide local service to portions of these areas.



         In 1956 it was recognized by the State Health De-



partment and confirmed by engineers of the County Road Com-



mission, who operated the county-owned system as the county's



agent, that reserves in capacity in the interceptor system



were rapidly diminishing.  The department notified the



county and the communities served by the district of the im-



pending deficiencies, entered into an agreement with the



county, imposed restrictions on sewer construction in June,



1959* ordered further reduction in use of sewers in June, 1961



and in all respects took actions and adopted measures sim-



ilar to those taken in the Rouge Valley District as outlined



previously.



         These restrictions and those denying approval of



sewer extensions are still in effect today.  These measures



have been responsible to a marked degree for the determined



effort by all parties in recent months to accelerate the



entire project for construction of relief interceptors,



treatment works and trunk sewers.  Contracts have been



signed and an accelerated time schedule  calls for commence-

-------
                                                      233
ment of construction by June, 1962.
         Work scheduled for completion by October, 1962
consists of additional settling tanks and chlorination
facilities sufficient to provide the degree of treatment to
be expected from adequate primary type sewage treatment
facilities with effluent disinfection.  The installation
of two-stage chlorination will assure a high degree of
bacteriological control.
         The remainder of the project, scheduled for com-
pletion by July, 1963* will substantially reduce overflows
from combined sewer areas, reduce local overloads on trunk
and Interceptor sewer systems, enlarge and extend treatment
facilities for future needs and extend trunk sewers into
areas now undeveloped or lacking in sewer systems.  As indi-
cated in other portions of this report, equivalent controls
are scheduled for completion in other nearby areas concur-
rently with this project.
         When the proposed facilities are completed there
     will be overflows from combined sewer systems for a
portion of the original service area.  Adequacy of the com-
pleted facilities, in combination with other Improvements
made concurrently in other nearby communities and indus-
tries whose waste discharges affect the same reaches of the
Detroit River, will be evaluated and determined at that
time by the Water Resources Commission and the Michigan

-------
                                                      234



Department of Health.  No reasonably accurate determination



of the separate effect of discharges from this system can



be made until all the control measures currently scheduled



for completion by the end of 1963 are in operation.



Trenton District



         Since 19^-0 the county has built and operated a



sewage treatment plant at Trenton and an interceptor sewer



to serve the majority of this city.  In 1957 the Village of



Gibraltar was connected to this plant on the condition that



the plant be expanded and improved.  Although this condition



was accepted by the county, no progress toward construction



had been made by June, 1959.  The restrictions imposed by



the Michigan Department of Health on sewer construction in



June, 1959 and June, 1961 were identical to those outlined



in the preceding discussion on thaWyandotte (Downriver)



District.  Steps taken by the City of Trenton to construct



its own sewage treatment plant have retarded the program



for correction of existing deficiencies.



         Existing facilities are grossly overloaded and not



adequate to provide treatment sufficient to control pollution



as prescribed by Michigan statutes.



         It is expected that corrective measures to provide



an adequate facility will be undertaken by early summer by



the city or the county and completed by early 1963.



         The sewered populations and sewer systems of the

-------
                                                      235

two communities served by these facilities are summarized

in Table X.  Present connected population is estimated at

about 20,000.



                      Table X

                                          Combined Sewer
             Pop.   % of Pop. Type of     Overflows
Community   (i960)   Sewered  Sewers	Discharge to
Gibraltar   2,196       20     San.
«Trenton   17,439       60     San.       	
                        40     Comb.      Detroit River
•See also Wyandotte District (Table IX).
                Grosse lie Township

         The township has a population of 6,318.  Approx-

imately 50 percent of the occupied dwellings are served by

a public sewer system and the remainder have private systems

consisting of septic tank and tile field.  About 50 percent

of the dwellings in the sewered area are connected to combined

sewers, the remainder being connected to sanitary sewers.

         The combined sewers are county drains which dis-

charge into the Detroit River at several locations.  Treat-

ment facilities are inadequate on the combined sewer systems.

In 1957 the Water Resources Commission, acting on a finding

of the State Health Commissioner that the inadequate sewerage

facilities constituted a menace to public health, petitioned

the Wayne County Drain Commissioner to take the necessary

-------
                                                      236



steps to correct the deficiencies.  The Drain Commissioner



expects to begin construction of a new treatment plant and



interceptors to serve the needs of the township this summer



and to complete same in 1963.



         Combined sewer overflows discharge into the



Thoroughfare Canal and Detroit River and are under surveil-



lance by the Michigan Department of Health to determine the



need for additional control beyond that presently provided.



         The sanitary sewers were built in 1956-57 and con-



nect to an adequate primary type treatment plant with effluenfc



disinfection before discharging to the Detroit River.



         MR. PIERCE:



                    Rouge River



         Waste discharges to the Rouge River consist of the



effluent from the Dearborn Sewage Treatment Plant and over-



flows from combined sewer systems of Detroit, Dearborn and



several other communities in Wayne and Oakland Counties.



As the lands adjacent to the river have been developed in-



creasingly for organized recreation and residential purposes,



it has become Increasingly necessary to reduce waste dis-



charges to a minimum.  As discussed earlier under the Wayne



County - Rouge Valley and Oakland County - Evergreen-



Farmington District of the Detroit sewerage system, sewage



from these major districts previously discharged to the



Rouge River is now connected to the Detroit system for dis-

-------
                                                         237
charge to the Detroit River.  The City of Farmington, which
previously discharged to the Rouge River, has also been con-
nected to the Detroit System.
          All that remains in the Rouge River today is the
Dearborn Sewage Treatment Plant effluent and the overflows
from combined sewer system.  Such overflows occur under
varying conditions of runoff in certain areas in Detroit,
Dearborn and other communities in Wayne and Oakland Counties.
          The sewage treatment plant owned and operated by
Dearborn serves the west portion of Dearborn and three com-
munities in the Lower Rouge section of the Rouge Valley Dis-
trict of the Wayne County Metropolitan sewerage and sewage
disposal system.  Areas connected to the plant are shown on
Table XI.  Connected population is estimated at about
150,000.
          (Table XI is as follows: )

-------
                                     Table XI
Community
                                  Pop.
                                 (I960)
                            56,000
                                      % of Pop.
                                      Sewered
*Dearborn (west side)

Wayne County System:

  Inkster

  Nankin Township
    (south portion)

  Wayne


*See also Detroit connection for east portion.
100
          Type of
          Sewers
              Combined Sewer Over-
              flows Discharge To
Comb.
39,097
30,000
19,071
100
85
100
San.
Comb.
San.
San.
Comb.
Rouge River
                                                         - 20$   Rouge River
                                                         - 20$   Rouge Rivei
                                                                                           ro
                                                                                           OJ
                                                                                           OD

-------
                                                      239
Dearborn
         The city has a population of 112,007.  Virtually
all occupied properties are connected to the combined sewer
system.
         Pollution control was first established in 1931
when the west side chemical precipitation treatment plant
and the east side primary type treatment plant were com-
pleted.  In 1939 additions to the west side plant were com-
pleted.  Treatment service was provided also for the area in
the City of Detroit served by the Southfield sewer.  This
portion of the City of Detroit was later connected to the
Detroit treatment plant.  In 19^0 treatment service was ex-
tended to Wayne, Inkster and part of Nankin Township (see
next section).
         In conformity with a stipulation to the Water
Resources Commission, the City of Dearborn discontinued use
of the east side treatment plant by making a connection to
the Detroit Northwest Interceptor and treatment plant in
1959.  Construction has started on a connection for the
west portion of Dearborn to this same interceptor and is
expected to be completed by July, 1962.  When this con-
nection Is completed all of the sewage from Dearborn, Wayne,
Inkster and a portion of Nankin Township will be treated by
Detroit.
         Combined  sewer overflows to the Rouge River are
                                                 GPO 820B19-B-S

-------
                                                      240



under surveillance by the Michigan Department of Health to



determine the need for additional control beyond that



presently provided.



Farmington - Treatment of Combined Sewer Overflows



         The City of Farmington has a system of sewers,



largely of the combined type, serving virtually all the



present population of 7,000.  In 1957 the city established



pollution control in conformity with an Order of the Water



Resources Commission adopted April, 1952 and affirmed by



Circuit Court Decree of 1953.



         Facilities consist of a connection to the Detroit



sewer system for rates of flow about three times the average.



This connection was made in 1956.  In addition, the city in



1957 placed in operation sedimentation and chlorination



facilities for control of the excess flows from the combined



sewer system during wet weather.  Adequate control of pol-



lution is provided by this combination of facilities.



Wayne County - Rouge Valley District - Lower Rouge Section



         About 1940 an interceptor sewer was constructed



by the county generally parallel with the lower branch of



the Rouge River to collect sewage from the communities listed



in Table XI and convey it to Dearborn for treatment at the



Greenfield Road (west side) plant.



         The sewer systems of these communities were largely



of the combined type.  Some progress has been made in recent

-------
                                                      241



years to convert these sewers to separate systems.



         As in the Middle Rouge Section and in the Downriver



District, it was recognized in 1956 that serious deficiencies



existed in the facilities to control pollution for this area.



The greatest deficiency was lack of capacity at the Dearborn,



plant to provide treatment for wastes delivered from this



district together with wastes collected within the City of



Dearborn.  No reserve capacity remained at that time in the



interceptor.  Actions taken by the department to acquaint



responsible officials with the need for immediate correction



and so restrict further overloading of the sewer system



were identical to those taken in relation to the Middle



Rouge area previously discussed.



         In August, 1961 contracts were executed between the



Cities of Detroit and Dearborn to connect to the Detroit



Northwest Interceptor.  This work is scheduled for completion



by July, 1962.  In addition, contracts between the county,



the communities in this service area and Dearborn call for



utilization of this same connection to Detroit for a tempo-



rary period pending completion of a new and separate inter-



ceptor connection to Detroit to be built by the county to



serve this area.  This interceptor is also under contract



for construction.  The connection to Detroit, both in its



temporary and permanent form, will remove the discharge of



untreated sewage and inadequately treated plant effluent from

-------
                                                      242



the Rouge River.



         Pollution control facilities thus provided  will



have sufficient capacity adequate for the 1980 projected



population.



         THE CHAIRMAN:  We will recess at this time  for



ten minutes.



         (Whereupon a recess was had.)



         THE CHAIRMAN:  May we reconvene.  It is always



rash to make predictions, but we confidently hope with



the cooperation of the people here we will be able to be



through this afternoon.  Our schedule now will call for a



prompt recess for lunch at twelve o'clock:, one hour and a



quarter for lunch, and we will convene at one-fifteen p.m.



and push on until we are completed.  Dr. Heustis.



         DR. HEUSTIS:  Mr. Pierce, will you continue, if



you please.



         MR. PIERCE:  Yes.



                   Clinton River



         There are 20 communities located along the Clinton



River and its branches from mouth to headwaters.  The muni-



cipal facilities for collection and treatment of sewage in



these communities is summarized in Table XII.

-------
                                                      243

                     Table XII

         Total Number of Communities            20

         Total Population (i960)           323,500

         Population in Communities With    315,000
         Sewage Treatment Plants

         Population Connected  to  Sewers    250,000
         and Treatment Plants

         Number of Communities With             15
         Sewer Systems

         Number of Communities With            *15
         Treatment Plants

         Type of Treatment (All Have
         Facilities for Chlorination)

              Primary                          3
              Secondary                     **12

   •"•Includes three communities who contract  with  other
         communities for sewage treatment.

  **Three communities each have two secondary type  plants.
         All except  four of these  communities have  adequate

sewage collection and "treatment  works to meet the requisites

of Michigan statutes.  Three of  these are under Court order

to abate pollution,  two are improving existing treatment

facilities and the third is building a connection to the

Detroit system.  The remaining community, a city of about

1,500 population, is considering the addition of secondary

treatment.

         In the five communities without sewers or  sewage

treatment works the total population Is about 7,000.  Sewage

-------
                                                      244



disposal is by septic tanks and soil absorption on individual



properties..



Almont




         The village has a population of 1,279 (I960) of vrtiiqh



1,250 are connected to the municipal sewerage system.  About



half of the community is served by separate sanitary sewers,



the remainder of the served area being connected to combined



sewers.



         Pollution control was established in 1958 when a



secondary type sewage treatment plant consisting of trickling



filters and effluent disinfection was completed, as urged



by the Michigan Department of Health and the Water Resources



Commission.



         Existing facilities are adequate and have reserves



for an additional population of 300.



 Armada



         The village has a population of 1,111.  Virtually



all occupied properties are served by a combined sewer system.



         Pollution control was established in 1957 when a



secondary type sewage treatment plant consisting of trickling



filters and effluent disinfection was completed, as urged



by the Michigan Department of Health and the Water Resources



Commission.



         Existing facilities are adequate and have reserves



for an additional population of 400„

-------
                                                      245
Center Line  (see also Detroit Table II)
         The city has a population of 10,164 (1960), vir-
tually all of which is served by a system of combined
sewers, about one-half of which discharge into the South
Macomb Sanitary District system, with treatment provided in
the Detroit Sewage Treatment Plant.
         Conversion of the entire municipal sewer system to
a separate sanitary type and construction of trunk sewers
and pumping facilities to discharge the entire municipal
sewage flow directly to the Detroit system for treatment is
now under way in accordance with an Order of the Water Re-
sources Commission affirmed by a Circuit Court Order issued
August 1, I960.   Upon completion of this construction, ex-
pected by December 1, 1962, pollution control facilities
will be adequate and have reserves for a population of
5,000.
Clarkston
         The village has a population of. 769.  Only the
business section is served by sewers.  These are separate
sanitary type.  The remainder of the community utilizes
private on-property septic tank type sewage disposal systems,
         Pollution control facilities consist of septic
tank followed by sand filters with undislnfected effluent
discharged to a small tributary of the Clinton River.
Disinfection currently under consideration.  No reserves for

-------
                                                      246
 additonal connections are available  in the  existing  treat-
 ment facilities.
 Clinton Township
          The township has a population of 25,688 (i960).
 Two separate portions of the township, with a combined  pop-
 ulation of about  12,000, are served  by systems of separate
 sanitary sewers which also serve a population of about  5,000
 in the City of Frazer.  The remainder of the township util-
 izes private, on-property septic tank type  sewage disposal
 systems.
          Pollution control facilities consist of two sepa-
rate secondary type sewage treatment  plants  consisting of
 trickling filters with effluent disinfection.
          The existing facilities are adequate with reserves
 for an additional population of 19,000.
 Fraser
          The city has a population of 7,027 (i960).   About
 70 percent of the community is served by a system of sepa-
rate sanitary sewers, the remainder utilizing private on-
 property septic tank type sewage disposal systems.
          Pollution control consists of connection of the
 sanitary sewer system to the Clinton Township system, described
 elsewhere in this report.
 Lake Angelus
          The village has a population of 231 (I960.   The
  community

-------
                                                      24?
has no formal sewer system and utilizes private on-property
septic tank type sewage disposal systems.
Lake Orion
         The village has a population of 2,698 (i960).  The
community has no formal sewer system and utilizes private
on-property septic tank type sewage disposal systems.
Leonard
         The village has a population of 391 (I960).  The
community has no formal sewer system and utilizes private
on-property septic tank type sewage disposal systems.
Mt. Clemens
         The city has a population of 21,016 (i960).   Vir-
tually all properties within the city are served by the
combined sewer system.
         Pollution control was established in 1951 when a
secondary type sewage treatment plant consisting of trickling
filters with effluent disinfection was completed.
         Existing facilities are inadequate with no reserves
for additional growth.
Orchard Lake
         The village has a population of 1,127 (1960).  The
community has no formal sewer system and utilizes  private
on-property septic tank type sewage disposal systems.
Oxford
         The village has a population of 2,357 (I960).  The

-------
                                                       248



 community has no formal sewer system and  utilizes private




 on-property septic tank type sewage disposal systems.



 Pontlac




          The city has a population of 82,233 of which  about



 75*000 are connected to the sewer system.  Two-thirds  of




 the system is of the separate sanitary type, the remainder



 being combined sewers.  Several large industries discharge



 sanitary and industrial wastes to the system.




          Pollution control was established in 1921 by  the



 construction of a secondary type sewage treatment plant  con-




sisting of Imhoff tanks and trickling filters.  Some additions



 were completed in 1929.  Additional facilities, including



 activated sludge and effluent disinfection, were completed




 In 19^0.  Further additions to relieve overloads were  com-




 pleted in 1953» under an Order issued by  the Water Resources




 Commission in!951.  Construction of a new sewage treatment



 plant to supplement the existing plant was commenced in  the



 spring of 1961 in conformity with a Circuit Court Decree




 issued November, I960 affirming the defaulted Order of the




 Water Resources Commission issued August, 1959.



          When the additions now under construction are com-




 pleted (estimated June, 1963) pollution control facilities



 will be adequate and will have reserves for a population of



 40,000.

-------
                                                      249



Rochester



         The village has a population of 5,431.  Virtually



all occupied properties are connected to the combined sewer



system.  The system also collects sanitary sewage and in-



dustrial wastes from industries, located both within and



outside of the corporate limits, having a population equiv-



alent of about 3*000.



         Pollution control was established in 1940 when a



primary type sewage treatment plant with effluent disinfection



was completed to  serve a population of 6,500.  Expansion of



the plant and addition of secondary treatment consisting of



activated sludge  was commenced early in 1961 and completed



early in 1962 in  conformity with requirements of the Mich-



igan Department of Health.



         Existing facilities are adequate and have reserves



for an additional population of about 10,000.



Romeo



         The village has a population of 3,32? (i960) which



is virtually all  served by the sewer system.  About 90 per



cent of the sewers are of the separate sanitary type and the



remainder are combined.



         Pollution control was originally established in



1925 wben a primary type sewage treatment plant consisting



of Imhoff tanks was completed.  Addition of disinfection



facilities was completed in 1937.

-------
                                                      250
         When additions to the sewage treatment  works  in-
cluding trickling filter type secondary treatment  facilities
and the separation of the sewer system are completed as
required by the Order of the Circuit Court issued  February
19, 1962, pollution control facilities will be adequate and
will have reserves for a population of 1,6?5.
Sterling Township
         The township has a population of 14,622 (i960).
Two separate portions of the township, with a combined pop-
ulation of about 10,000, are served by systems of separate
sanitary sewers.  The remainder of the area utilizes private^
on-property septic tank type sewage disposal systems.
         Pollution control facilities consist of two second-
ary type sewage treatment plants, each with effluent disin-
fection.  One of these plants is of the activated sludge
type, the other is of the trickling filter type (now being
enlarged and converted to activated sludge).
         The existing facilities are adequate with present
reserves for a population of 7*000.  When the present con-
struction work is completed (estimated to be June, 1962)
reserves will exist for a population of 12,000.
Sylvan Lake
         The city has a population of 2,004  (1960), vir-
tually all of which is connected to a system of separate
sanitary sewers discharging to the City of Pontiac's muni-

-------
                                                      251
clpal sewer system with treatment provided at the Pont lac
Municipal Sewage Treatment Works, described elsewhere in
this report.
Utioa
         The village has a population of 1,454 (1960), vir-
tually all being connected to the combined sewer system.
         Pollution control was originally established in
1938 with the construction of a primary type sewage treat-
ment plant with effluent disinfection.  This plant was
expanded in  1950.
         Secondary sewage treatment facilities are needed,
thus the existing facilities are inadequate.  No reserves
exist for additional connections.
Warren
         The city has  a population of 89,246 (I960), vir-
tually all of which is served by the sewer system.  About
85 percent of the system  is of the separate sanitary type,
the remainder being combined.
         Pollution control was established in 1959 with the
completion of a  secondary type sewage treatment plant con-
sisting  of activated  sludge with effluent disinfection as
urged by the Michigan  Department of Health and the Water
Resources Commission.
         Existing facilities are adequate with reserves for
a population of  30,000.

-------
                                                      252



Waterford Township




         The township has a population of 47,107 (1960).



Two portions of the township, with a combined population of



about 1,300, are served by systems of separate sanitary




sewers.  Pollution control facilities for these two portions



consist of two secondary type sewage treatment plants, each



consisting of trickling filters, and sand filters with



effluent disinfection.



         Both of these existing facilities are adequate with



no reserves for additional connections.



         A third portion of the township, with a population



of about 5,000, is served by a system of separate sanitary



sewers which discharge Into the City of Pontiac sewer system



with treatment provided at the Pontiac Municipal Sewage




Treatment Plant, described elsewhere in this report.



         The remainder of the township utilizes private



on-property septic tank type sewage disposal systems.



                         Huron River





         The municipal sewerage facilities existing today




in the 17 municipalities located along the river from mouth




to headwaters are summarized in Table XIII.

-------
                                                      253

                       Table XIII

         Total Number of Communities           17

         Total Population (i960)          147,000

         Population in Communities with   140,000
         Sewage Treatment Plants

         Number of Communities With            12
         Sewer Systems

         Number of Communities With            12
         Sewage Treatment Plants

         Total Number of Sewage Treatment      14
         Plants

         Type of Treatment (All Have
         Facilities for Chlorination)

              Primary                           4 plants
              Secondary                        10 plants
                                              (8 communities)


         The facilities for pollution control are adequate

to meet the requirements of Michigan statutes in all except

three of the communities.  Each of these have contracted

with Wayne County for expansion and improvement of treat-

ment facilities, scheduled for construction this year.

         The five communities without formal sewer systems

have a total population of about 7,000.  Sewage disposal

is by septic tanks and soil absorption.

Ann Arbor

         The city has a population of 67,340.  Virtually

all occupied properties are connected to the sanitary sewer

system.

-------
                                                      254




         Pollution control was established originally in



1936 when a secondary type treatment plant was completed.




Additions to the plant were made in 1951.  Treatment con-



sists of activated sludge and effluent disinfection and is



adequate.  The plant is approaching capacity and an engineer-



ing report has been completed outlining a program for plant



expansion which will serve future needs of the city.



Belleville



         The city has a population of 1,921.  Virtually all



occupied properties are connected to the sanitary sewer sys-



tem.



         Pollution control was established in 1940 when a



primary type treatment plant with effluent disinfection




was completed by Wayne County for use by the city.



         Existing facilities are inadequate.  Correction



was ordered by the Water Resources Commission in 1956 af-




firmed by Decree of the Circuit Court in 1957.  The city



in March, 1962 again contracted with Wayne County for sewage



disposal service.  The county plans to complete an inter-




ceptor from its Wyandotte plant to Belleville by July, 1963.



When this interceptor is completed the existing plant



serving the city will be abandoned and pollution control will




then be adequate.



Brighton



         The city has a population of 2,282.  Virtually all

-------
                                                      255

occupied properties are connected to the sanitary sewer

system.

         Pollution control was established in 19^0 when a

trickling filter type treatment plant with effluent disin-

fection was completed.  In 1958 the plant was enlarged to

meet the future needs of the city.

         The existing facilities are adequate for an addit-

ional population of 2,500.

Chelsea

         The village has a population of 3,355.  Virtually all

occupied properties are connected to the sanitary sewer

system.

         Pollution control was established originally in

1937 when a secondary type treatment plant was completed.

In I960 additions to the treatment plant were completed in

conformity with an agreement with the Michigan Department of

Health.

         Treatment consists of activated sludge and effluent

disinfection which are adequate for an additional population

of 1,000.

Dexter

         The village has a population of 1,702.  Virtually

all occupied properties are connected to the sanitary sewer

system.

         Pollution control was established originally in
                                                  GPO 820619-B-6

-------
                                                      256



1936 when a primary type treatment plant was completed.



In 1937 effluent disinfection facilities were added.  Exist-



ing facilities are up to capacity and plans and specifications



have been approved for plant expansion.  The village is



presently making arrangements to finance the plant enlarge-



ment.



Flat Rook



         The city has a population of 4,696.  Virtually all



occupied properties are connected to the sewer system.



Approximately 30 percent of the occupied properties are



connected to combined type sewers and the remainder to sep-



arate type sewers.



         Pollution control was established in 1940 when a



primary type treatment plant with effluent disinfection was



completed by Wayne County for use by the city.



         Existing facilities are  inadequate; however, plans



are completed for the expansion of the plant and construction



is expected to commence prior to May 1, 1962 and be completed



in 1963.  Combined sewer overflows are under continuing  sur-



veillance by the Michigan Department of Health to determine



the need for additional control beyond that presently pro-



vided.



Milford



         The City has a population of 4,323.  Virtually all



occupied properties are connected to the sanitary sewer  sys-

-------
                                                      257
tern.
         Pollution control was established in 1936 when an
Imhcff tank was completed.  The plant was expanded and a
trickling filter and effluent disinfection were added in
1952 in compliance with an Order of the Water Resources
Commission adopted  November, 1950.  The existing facili-
ties are adequate but there are no reserves.  The city
had an engineering report prepared outlining the manner that
the plant will be expanded when the need arises.
Pinckney
         The population of the village is 732.  No formal
public sewer system exists.  Most occupied properties are
served by private sewage disposal systems consisting of
septic tank and tile field.
Rockwood
         The city has a population of 2,026.  Virtually all
occupied properties are connected to the combined sewer
system.
         Pollution control was established in 19^0 when a
primary type treatment plant with effluent disinfection was
completed by Wayne County for use by the city.  Existing
facilities are inadequate.  Improvements are scheduled for
construction by the county in 1963.
         Combined sewer overflows are under continuing sur-
veillance by the Michigan Department of Health to determine

-------
                                                      258



the need for additional control beyond that presently pro-



vided.



Romulus Township



         The population of the township is 3,500.  Approx-



imately 2,000 are served by sanitary sewers and a trickling



filter type treatment plant with effluent disinfection oper-



ated by Wayne County.  The Detroit Wayne County Airport is



served by a county operated activated sludge type treatment



plant with effluent disinfection.  The township on March



7, 1962 contracted with Wayne County for expanded sewerage



service.  The county plans to complete an interceptor from



their plant at Wyandotte through the township by July, 1963.



This interceptor will provide service for almost the entire



township and make it possible to abandon the two existing



plants.



South
         The City has a population of 1,753.  Virtually all



occupied properties are connected to the sanitary sewer sys-



tem.



         Pollution control was established in 1939 when an



activated sludge type plant was completed.  In I960 the



plant was enlarged and effluent disinfection added in con-



formity with an agreement with the Michigan Department of



Health.  Treatment facilities are adequate for an additional



population of 3,000.

-------
South Rockwood



         The population of this village is 1,337.  No formal



public sewer system exists.  Most occupied properties are



served by private sewage disposal systems consisting of



septic tank and tile field.



Stookbrldge



         The population of this village is 1,097.  No formal



public sewer system exists.  Most occupied properties are



served by private sewage disposal systems consisting of



septic tank and tile field.



Wixom



         The population of this city is 1,531.  No formal



public sewer system exists.  Most occupied properties are



served by private sewage disposal systems consisting of



septic tank and tile field.



Wolverine Lake



         The population of this village is 2,404.  No



formal public sewer system exists.  Most occupied properties



are served by private sewage disposal systems consisting of



septic tank and tile field.



Ypsilanti



         The city has a population of 20,957.  Virtually all



occupied properties are connected to the sewer system.



Approximately 20 percent of the occupied properties are



connected to combined type sewers and the remainder to

-------
                                                      260
separate type sewers.
         Pollution control was established in 1939 when a
primary type treatment plant with effluent disinfection was
completed.  In conformity with an agreement with the Mich-
igan Department of Health construction of additions including
activated sludge type treatment are now in progress and ex-
pect to be completed by September, 1963.  The expanded plant
will be adequate for an additional population of 10,000.  Com-
bined sewer overflows are under continuing surveillance by
the Michigan Department of Health to determine the need for
additional control beyond that presently provided.
Ypsilanti Township
         The township has a population of 25,900.  Approx-
imately 23,000 people are connected to the sanitary sewer
system.
         In 1944 the U.S. Government constructed in the
township sanitary sewers and two activated sludge type treat-
ment plants with effluent disinfection.  After World War II
these facilities were purchased by the township.
         Existing facilities are adequate and have a limited
reserve.  The township has plans completed for making addi-
tions to one plant which will make it possible to abandon
the other plant and provide some additional treatment capacity
for future growth.  A Court action has been filed against
the township by downstream  riparians.  Construction of the

-------
                                                      261

plant additions is being delayed because bonds cannot be

sold with litigation pending.  This work will commence as

soon as the litigation is terminated.

                    Raisin River

         The municipal facilities for sewage collection

and treatment in the 16 communities located along the

Raisin River and its branches from mouth to headwater are

summarized in Table XIV.



                       Table XIV

              Total Number of Communities           16

              Total Population (I960)           67,000

              Population in Communities With    62,000
              Treatment Plants

              Number of Communities With             9
              Sewer Systems

              Number of Communities With             9
              Treatment Plants

              Type of Treatment (All Have
              Facilities for Chlorination)

                 Primary                            4
                 Secondary                          5


         The facilities for pollution control are adequate

to meet requisites of the Michigan statutes at all plants

and have reserves for expansion at all except one.

         In the seven communities without  sewer systems

total population is about 5,000.  Sewage disposal is by

-------
                                                      262



septic tanks and soil absorption.



Adrian



         The olty has a population of 20,34?.  About 90



percent of the occupied properties are connected to the



sewer system.  About half of the sewered population is



served by separate sanitary sewers, the remainder being



connected to combined sewers.



         Pollution control was established originally in



1926 when a primary type sewage treatment plant was com-



pleted.  Secondary treatment was added in 1939 by Order of



the Stream Control Commission and expanded in 1951 In con-



formity with an Order of the Water Resources Commission af-



firmed by Circuit Court Decree.  Treatment consists of



activated sludge and effluent disinfection.  The plant has



reserves for a population of 5*000.  Combined sewer overflow?



are under continuing surveillance by the Michigan Department



of Health to determine the need for additional control beyonqi



that presently provided.



Blissfield



         The village has a population of 2,653.  Virtually a).l



occupied properties are connected to the combined sewer



system.



         Pollution control was established In 1957 when a



primary type sewage treatment plant with effluent disin-



fection-was completed in conformity with an Order of the

-------
                                                      263

Water Resources Commission adopted September, 1951.  Ex-

isting facilities are adequate and have reserves for an

additional population of 1,500.  Combined sewer overflows

are under continuing surveillance by the Michigan Department
                                                             \
of Health to determine the need for additional control beyond

that presently provided.

Britton

         The population of this village is 622.  No formal

public sewer system exists.  Most occupied properties are

served by .private sewage disposal systems consisting of

septic tank and tile field.

Brooklyn

         The population of this village is 986.  No formal

public sewer system exists.  Most occupied properties are

served by private sewage disposal systems consisting of

septic tank and tile field.

Cement City

         The population of this village is 4?1.  No formal

public sewer system exists.  Most occupied properties are

served by private sewage disposal systems consisting of

septic tank and tile field.

Clayton


         The population of this village is 4?0.  No formal

public sewer system exists.  Most occupied properties are

served by private sewage disposal systems consisting of

-------
                                                      264



septic tank and tile field.



Clinton



         The village has a population of 1,481.  Virtually



all occupied properties are connected to the separate sewer



system.



         Pollution control was established in 1942 when a



primary type treatment plant with effluent disinfection was



completed.  Existing facilities are adequate and have re-



serves for an additional population of 200.



Deerfield



         The population of this village is 866.  No formal



public sewer system exists.  Most occupied properties are



served by private sewage disposal systems consisting of



septic tank and tile field.



Dundee



         The village has a population of 2,377.  Virtually



all occupied properties are connected to the combined sewer



system.



         Pollution control was established in 1958 when a



primary type sewage treatment plant with effluent disin-



fection was completed in conformity with an Order of the



Water Resources Commission adopted 1951 and affirmed by



Circuit Court Decree dated  May, 1956.  Existing facilities



are adequate and have reserves for an additional population



of 1,000.   Combined sewer overflows are under continuing



surveillance by the Michigan Department of Health to deter-

-------
                                                      265
mine the need for additional controls beyond that presently
provided.
Manchester
         The village has a population of 1,568.  Virtually
all occupied properties are connected to the combined sewer
system.
         Pollution control was established in 1957 when a
secondary type sewage treatment plant consisting of trickling.
filters and effluent disinfection was completed in conformity
with an Order of the Water Resources Commission adopted 1951
and affirmed by Circuit Court Decree.  Existing facilities
are adequate and have reserves for an additional population
of 800.  Combined sewer overflows are under continuing sur-
veillance by the Michigan Department of Health to determine
the need for additional controls beyond that presently pro-
vided .
Milan
         The village has a population of 3,6l6.  Virtually
all occupied properties are connected to the combined sewer
system.
         Pollution control was established In 195^ when a
secondary type sewage treatment plant consisting of trickling
filters and effluent disinfection was completed in conform-
ity with an Order of the Water Resources Commission adopted
1931.  Existing facilities are adequate and have reserves

-------
                                                      266
for an additional population of 400.  Combined sewer over^
flows are under continuing surveillance by the Michigan De-
partment of Health to determine the need for additional
controls beyond that presently provided.
Monroe
         The City of Monroe has a population of 22,968.
Virtually all occupied properties are connected to the
sewer system.  Approximately 40 percent of the occupied
properties are connected to combined type sewers and the
remainder to separate type sewers.
         Pollution control was established in 1937 when a
primary type sewage treatment plant with effluent disin-
fection was completed.  Existing facilities are adequate
and have reserves for an additional population of 2,000.
Combined sewer overflows are under continuing surveillance
by the Michigan Department of Health to determine the need
for additional controls beyond that presently provided.
Onsted
         The village has a population of 526.  About 50
percent of the occupied properties are connected to the com-
bined sewer system.
         Unlawful pollution has not been demonstrated;
however, the village has completed an engineering report
setting forth the means by which a sewerage system and
treatment would be provided.

-------
                                                       267
 Petersburg
          The population of this  village  is 1,018.   No
 formal public sewer system exists.   Most occupied  prop-
 erties are served by private sewage  disposal systems con-
sisting of septic tank and  tile field.
 Saline
          The village has a population  of 2,334.  Virtually
 all occupied properties are connected  to the sewer system.
 Approximately 20 percent of the  occupied properties are
 connected to combined type sewers and  the remainder to
 separate type sewers.
          Pollution control was established originally in
 1956 when a trickling filter type sewage treatment plant
 with effluent disinfection was completed in conformity with
 an Order of the Water Resources  Commission adopted in 1951.
 Existing facilities are reaching capacity and  the  village
 has been notified by the Michigan Department  of Health to
 commence planning plant additions.
 Teoumseh
          The city has a population of  7,045.   Virtually
 all occupied properties are  connected  to the  sanitary sewer
 system.
          Pollution control was established in!953  when a
 trickling filter type treatment  plant  with effluent  disin-
 fection  was completed in conformity  with an Order  of the

-------
                                                      268



Water Resources Commission adopted in 1949.  Existing fac-



ilities are adequate and have reserves for an additional



population of 400.



                     Lake St. Glair



         Waste discharges to Lake St. Glair consist of the



effluent from the sewage treatment plant at New Baltimore,



residual pollutants in the tributary streams and St. Glair



River and the overflows from the combined sewer systems



of the South Macomb Sanitary District and the Milk River



Drainage District.  The tributary streams are the Salt



River and Clinton River.  The Salt River is not within the



scope of this report.  The Clinton River has been discussed



under a previous section.



New Baltimore



         The city has a population of 3,159 (i960), virtually



all of which is served by a system of separate sanitary



sewers.



         Pollution control was established in 1961, with



completion of a secondary type sewage treatment plant con-



sisting of a trickling filter with effluent disinfection, as



urged by the Michigan Department of Health.  The existing



facilities are adequate with reserves for a population of



3,000.



Milk River Drainage District



        -Until the summer of I960 the sewage and storm water

-------
                                                      269



of the City of Grosse Pointe Woods was discharged to Milk



River during periods of runoff.  The storm water and some



sewage from the City of Harper Woods also was discharged to



this stream.  Inadequacies in capacity of the system re-



sulted in flooding of basements in Grosse Pointe woods with



mixtures of sewage and storm water during wet weather per-



iods.  These conditions were found by the State Health Com-



missioner in 1954 to create a menace to public health and



a public nuisance.



         Facilities completed in I960 by the Intercounty



Drainage Board of Wayne and Macomb Counties were installed,



at the urging of the Michigan Department of Health, to



control these health hazards and nuisances.  They consist of



enclosure of a major portion of Milk River, thereby pro-



viding an adequate outlet for the combined sewer system of



Grosse Pointe Woods and a combination of facilities for re-



tention, storage and treatment of the excess flows from



such system during period of surface runoff.




         As described earlier under Wayne County-Northeast



Interceptor District, the sanitary sewage flow is inter-



cepted to Detroit for treatment, thereby providing adequate



control of pollution during dry weather periods.  The facil-



ities for treatment of the overflows from the system during



wet weather are under the continuing surveillance of the



Michigan Department of Health to determine the need for addi-

-------
                                                      270




 tlonal control beyond that presently provided.



South Maoomb Sanitary District



         As stated previously under Wayne County-Northeast



Interceptor District, the South Macomb Sanitary District



and its constituent municipalities stipulated in I960 to



provide facilities by September, 1963 adequate to control



pollution from the overflows of combined sewer system which



presently are discharged to Lake St. Clalr.  Plans for



such facilities for a portion of the area have been com-



pleted.  Financing the project is currently delayed by



Court action contesting assessments.



                       Lake Erie



         Wastes discharged to Lake Erie consist of the



residual pollution from the Detroit River and tributary



streams together with some shoreline pollution from un-



sewered areas.  The principal tributary streams in Michigan



are the Huron River and Raisin River discussed previously



in this report.  Minor tributaries are Sandy, Stony and



Swan .Creeks.



Carleton



         The village has a population of 1,379.  No formal



public sewer system exists.  Most occupied properties are



served by private sewage disposal systems consisting of



septic tank and tile field.



         Plans are being prepared for the development of a

-------
                                                      271

public  sewerage  system  and treatment plant.  Means of

financing the  project are also being evaluated.

Estral  Beach

          The population of this village is 254.  No formal

public  sewer system exists.  Host occupied properties are

served  by private  sewage disposal systems consisting of

septic  tank and  tile field.

Maybee

          The population of this village is 459.  No formal

public  sewer system exists.  Most occupied properties are

served  by private  sewage disposal systems consisting of

septic,  tank and  tile field.

          I would like to ask that this additional statement

be  incorporated  in the  record.

          DR. HEUSTIS:   Would the proper place for this be

at  the  end of  Chapter II?

          MR. PIERCE:  That is correct.

          DR. HEUSTIS:   The following statement will be in-

corporated  in  the  written record, then.

          MR. PIERCE:  Thank you.

          A report  completed this month, March 1962, by the

"City of Monroe, makes provision for treatment in its plant

of  sewage collected from the developed shoreline properties

in  Prenchtown  Township.

          A program is being developed in the township to
                                                  GPO B208I9-B-7

-------
                                                      272




provide lateral sewers In these areas to be connected  to



the City of Monroe for treatment.   This is a partial  so-




lution to a problem that was discussed yesterday, and  It



is well recognized in the area that shoreline property



both in Monroe County and in the counties to the north,




the counties of Wayne, Macomb, and St. Clalr, the unin-




corporated areas do not have adequate facilities in many



instances to provide the requisite protection to the re-




ceiving waters.  In several of these areas plans are under-



way for the development of lateral sewers and treatment



works where the population is sufficiently dense to make



this possible and practicable from a financial standpoint.



         One of these areas is Prenchtown Township, a  township




lying directly north, in this area, north of the City of




Monroe, and which very naturally can connect to the city



where the sewage can be treated and discharged into the




Raisin River,  Much more work needs to be done in several



of these other areas in the other counties, and is under




continuing evaluation, and surveillance both by the County




Health Departments in these areas and by the state regu-




latory agencies.



         Mr. Chairman, this completes Chapter II.



         DR. HEUSTIS:  Thank you.  Mr. Oeming, will you




continue with Chapter III.



         MR. VOGT:  I would like to summarize.

-------
                                                       273



          DR. HEUSTIS:  Oh,  I beg  your pardon.   Briefly.



          MR. VOGT:



 Ace omp11shment s



          During the last ten years  nearly all  of  the  com-



 munities in the five river  and  two  lake  basins covered by



 this report have been active in developing improved facil-



 ities for control of pollution  discharged to these waters.



 Today every city, village and township,  having a  sewer system,




has either a sewage treatment plant  of its own  or  contracts



 with another governmental unit  for  treatment of its collected



 wastes.  For many years no  proposed sewer has  been author-



 ized by the State Health Commissioner for construction un-



 less adequate provision has been  made for treatment of the



 wastes so collected.  Of a  population of approximately



 3,500*000 living in developed sections of this area,  less




 than two percent live in municipalities  having no sewer




 system.  In most communities nearly all  of the population




 is connected to the sewer system.  Thus  it is  apparent that



 virtually all of the sewage from  residential areas, except




 in small scattered developments,  is being treated currently



 in municipally owned sewage treatment plants.



 Adequacy of Facilities



          There are no other municipal projects outstanding



 where actionable violations of  the  requisites  of  the  Mich-



 igan pollution control statutes have been officially  recog-

-------
                                                      274



nized or identified by either agency.  Two communities



covered in previous sections currently are planning to



install additional treatment facilities without formal



action by either agency.



         The extent of adequacy or completeness of compli-



ance with statutory requirements is constantly being ap-



praised by the staffs cfthe two agencies.  The dynamic



nature of a mobile and expanding population, and industry



continually changes the relationship between pollutional



loadings on the stream, resultant water quality and water



objectives.  That these changing needs have been recognized



and are being met is evident from the large number of com-



munities and industries which have installed or are sched-



uling the installation of additions to existing treatment



or control facilities (see especially column 2 of Table



XV).  The term "additions" is used here to differentiate



between the original facilities designated as "new" and



those expanded in capacity or to which secondary treatment



is added.  It is  significant to note also that nearly all



of the treatment plants and interceptor systems, except



those under construction or scheduled for construction,



have rather substantial reserves in capacity.  A few like



the Evergreen-Farmington Interceptor in Oakland County have



reserves sufficient for ultimate population, in this instance



about-275,000.

-------
                                                      275
Combined Sewers
         Measures taken in relation to combined  sewers
fall into three categories, namely:  elimination,  treatment
of overflows and continuing appraisal of the need  for or
nature of controls required.
         Throughout this area most  newly developing com-
munities are building separate type sewer systems.  In
many of these areas this required a radical departure from
established practice.  Except for the Cities of  Detroit
and Dearborn and a few adjLoent communities almost com-
pletely served now with combined sewers, practically all
of the area has initiated and will  continue to build sep-
arate systems.
         At Farmington and Grosce Pointe Woods-Harper Woods,
facilities have been completed during the last two years for
storage, retention and treatment of excess flows from com-
bined sevrer systems in wet weather.  Both the South Macomb
Sanitary District and the Southeastern Oakland County com-
munities havs projects for similar  controls ready for con-
struction.
         In all other areas, both  in small communities on
fche small streams and the communities on the shore of the
Detroit River, the two agencies keep the overflows from
such systems under continuing surveillance and investigation,

-------
                                                      2?6
 Work Yet  To Be Done
          Needs which have  been identified and determined
 are listed  in Tables XV and  XVII and  Identified  under Status
 of Compliance as "commenced" or "scheduled  1962,"  in the
 former Table and as "not demonstrated"  or  "additions re-
 quired" in  the latter.   All  of the  municipal projects
 should be completed in  1963.  No other  unsatisfied muni-
 cipal needs are known,  except at two  small  communities pre^-
vLously mentioned where  the projects for expansion  are in
 the planning stage.
          It  is significant that all of  the se projects are
 for additions to existing  systems.  Most of these  are for
 ultimate  development of the  service area.
          The majority of the municipal  projects  involve
 relief to a common  interceptor or additions to a treatment
 plant serving several communities —  usually ten to fifteen
 in one project.  The complexities of  apportioning  the
 costs, arranging the financing and  completing contractual
 arrangements among  these governmental units tends  to delay
 the project  substantially, compared with one serving a
 single community.  The  need  for all of  these projects was
 accepted  by the communities  from three  to five years ago.
 Each of these projects  is  now assured.   Several  are under
 construction and the rest  are to be commenced this year.
 Chief among the currently  outstanding problems of  industrial

-------
                                                      277



 waste disposal,  which have  not  been  fully evaluated  to  estab-



 lish the extent  of corrective measures  required,  is  the dis-



 solved oxygen deficiency and  bacterial  contamination caused



 in the lower Raisin River by  the paper  mills at Monroe.



 Developments expected to mature in 1962 will have a  mate-



rially beneficial effect  on  the  present  river conditions as



 measured by these parameters.



          Investigation and  appraisal of pollutional  dis-



 charges from all sources is a continuing process. What is



 satisfactory today in relation  to water quality objectives



 and uses of receiving waters  may be  inadequate or unsatis-



 factory tomorrow.  The staffs of the two agencies contin-



 ually appraise the magnitude  and quality of pollutional



 discharges, both present and  impending. Their present



 effect upon resources and uses  of the receiving waters  is



 examined and evaluated.   As additional  controls are found



 to be necessary  to meet  the requisites  of Michigan statutes: ,



 such facilities  will be  required.



          Thank you.



          THE CHAIRMAN:  Thank you.



          DR. HEUSTIS: Thank  you very much. Mr. Oeming.



          FURTHER STATEMENT  OF LOWRING F. OEMING,



          CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER  RESOURSES COMMISSION,



                     STATE OF  MICHIGAN



          MR. OEMING:  Mr. Chairman,  and conferees.   We  would

-------
                                                      278



like to point out that the report which has been presented



to the conferees will be available to anyone in the audience



who wishes one following the conclusions of my remarks.



These gentlemen will have more reports out here so see them



and get your copies.  We think we have enough to cover



everyone  in the room if everyone wants only one copy.  If



we run  out we will have copies       assembled at Lansing,



and if you will see Ron Crane — if you will Stand up so



people can see you — he will take your name and address



so you will get a copy in the mail.



     CHAPTER III.  INDUSTRIAL WASTE TREATMENT AND CONTROL.



         The majority of the industries in the basin dispose



of their wastes into the public sewage collection systems



described in Chapter II.  In these cases, responsibility for



control of industrial wastes together with the sanitary



sewage rests with the municipality.  Those industries



discharging wastes separately to watercourses through com-



pany owned sewers have a direct obligation to the Commission



to comply with the Water Resources Act.



         A program to control wastes from the latter class



os industries on the Detroit River was initiated by the



Michigan Stream Control Commission at a conference with these



industries i-n May, 1946.  This conference concluded with



the  Issuance  by v«e Commission of a statement describing



the  controls  which  it Qcnired to attain.   This statement

-------
                                                      279



has served as the basis for much of the pollution control



activity pursued by the Commission staff up until the



present, modified only as required by the Objectives,



adopted by the International Joint Commission in its report



to the governments of United States and Canada in 1951.



As an important adjunct to this program, the Commission



through its staff, has developed and issues an annual in-



dustrial Pollution Status Report.  All industries dis-



charging wastes directly to the waters of the state are



listed and each is assigned a rating on the degree of control



maintained during the preceding year.  Thedegree of control



is evaluated in relation to the statutory test of unlawful



pollution as defined in the Water Resources Act (Act 245,



P.A. 1929* as amended).  Each industry rated receives a



copy of the entire status report, providing a continuing



record by which it can measure its accomplishments and



can compare its progress with others.



         In the river basins of southeastern Michigan,



ratings were assigned on April 1, 1961, to 104 separate



problems in a total of 93 industrial establishments.



         The succeeding portion of this Chapter identifies



each of these sources of industrial waste discharged de-




scribes in general terms the principal waste constituents;



recites the types of actions taken by tne Water Resources



Commission and its predecessor stream Control Commission

-------
                                                      280



to attain control; and shows the rating assigned to each



at the present time.



ALLIED CHEMICAL CORPORATION operates four separate manu-



facturing plants discharging wastes to the lower Rouge



and Detroit Rivers:



         The General Chemical Division is located in the



City of River Rouge.  Operations produce cooling waters



which are normally unchanged in the process except for rise



 in temperature.  Wastes flow to the Rouge River Short Cut



Canal.  Cooling is by the indirect method.  Prevention of



product leaks to the sewer is maintained by continuous



automatic monitoring within the plant.  Sanitary sewage is



disposed of by subsurface percolation methods on the plant



premises with no direct discharge to the river.  Control



of wastes is rated as adequate.



         Plastics and Coal Tar Division is located in the



City of Detroit.  Wastes are produced from the processing



of coal tars and are discharged to the Old Rouge River



Channel.  Following request by the Michigan Stream Control



Commission in 19^7* measures were taken to reduce waste



flows, to restrict phenols, oils, tars and ammonia and to



eliminate raw sewage discharges.  Reduction in waste volume



was attained by process changes.  Oil and tar bearing wastes



are treated in gravity type separators.  Restriction of



phenols was attained in 1955 by installation of a solvent

-------
                                                      281



extraction system which yielded 94$ reduction with ac-



companying reduction In ammonia.  Sanitary sewage segregated



and connected to the Detroit system since 19^7.  Control of



wastes is rated as adequate.



         Semet-Solvay Division Is located in the City of



Detroit.  Wastes are produced from operations of a by-product



coke oven plant and discharged to the Old Rouge River Chan-



nel.  Following request by the Michigan Stream Control Com-



mission in 19^7* measures were taken to restrict phenols,



oil and ammonia and to eliminate raw sewage discharges.



Oil and ammonia are controlled by recovery methods within



the plant.  Restriction of phenols by a solvent extraction



system was instituted in 1957* accomplishing 95 percent



reduction.  Sanitary sewage segregated and connected to



Detroit system since 19^9.  Control of wastes is rated as



adequate.



         Solvay Process Division is located in the City of



Detroit.  The principal waste constituents produced are



Inert calcium carbonate solids In suspension, chlorides and



ammonia in solution and lubricating oils.  Following request



by the Michigan Stream Control Commission in 19^7» measures



were taken to improve the removal of solids, reduce oil losses



and eliminate raw sewage discharges.  Solids discharges are



presently treated in settling facilities on Zug Island.



Effluents are discharged to Detroit River and Old Channel

-------
                                                      282




of Rouge River.  Control of oil and ammonia discharges is



maintained by operating procedures within the plant.  Seg-



regation of sanitary sewage and connection to Detroit sys-




tem was provided in 19^9.  Control of wastes is rated as



adequate.




AMERICAN CEMENT CORPORATION




         The Peerless Cement Division is located in the



City of Detroit.  Wastes are produced from, the^production



of cement and are discharged to the Old Channel of Rouge



River.  Control measures were initiated following an eval-




uation by the Michigan Stream Control Commission of the



solids content of the wastes.  These solids originated from



the collection of dust and ash.  They have been virtually




eliminated from the discharges since 195^ when dry methods




of collection were installed to replace wet methods of



washing stack gases.  Present waste discharges consist



mainly of cooling waters and clay filtrate. Sanitary  sewage



is connected to the Detroit system.  Control of wastes is




.rated as adequate.



ANACONDA AMERICAN BRASS COMPANY is located in the City of




Detroit.  Wastes are produced from copper and brass casting



and rolling operations and flow into Detroit River.  Measures



were taken upon request of the Michigan Stream Control Com-



mission to restrict oils, to control acids and to eliminate



raw sewage discharges.  Oils are removed in gravity type

-------
                                                      283



separators, acid wastes are segregated and neutralized.



Sanitary sewage segregated and connected to the Detroit




system since 1947.  Control of wastes is rated as adequate.



ANDERSON CHEMICAL COMPSNY is located in Fai.-field Township,



Lenawee County.  Wastes originate from chemical compounding



operations and flow to Black Creek, a tributary of Raisin



River.  Restrictions and conditions on the acidity-alkalinity




range, on solids, oil and oxygen consuming content of the



process wastes and on sanitary sewage were established by



a new use Order of Determination issued January 21, I960



by the Water Resources Commission.  Control facilities were



installed coincident with start of manufacturing operations




employing equalization and settling in an earthen basin.



Sanitary sewage is disposed of by subsurface percolation



on company premises with no direct discharge to the river.




Adequacy of process waste control has not been fully demon-




strated.



ARCHER-DANIELS-MIDLAND COMPANY is located in the City of



Wyandotte on the Pennsalt Manufacturing Company premises.



Wastes are produced from the manufacture of hydrogenated



glycerides and fatty acids and are discharged to Detroit



River.  Measures were taken upon request by Michigan Stream




Control Commission in 19^7 to reduce the content of oils



and fatty acids in the discharges and to eliminate raw



sewage discharges.  Treatment system for process wastes,

-------
                                                       284



 expanded in 19^9* consists of gravity type oil-water sepa-



rators.  Sanitary sewage segregated and connected to Detroit



 system since 1947.  Control of wastes rated as adequate.



 ARGUS CAMERA is located in Ann Arbor.  Wastes originate from



 electroplating operations and are discharged to Allen



 Creek Drain, a tributary to the Huron River.  A new use



 Order of Determination issued by the Water Resources Com-



 mission on January 20, 1955 restricted the acidity-



 alkalinity range, cyanide, metallic ions, solids and oils.



 Facilities for treatment and control of these substances



 is connected to the Ann Arbor municipal sanitary system.



 Control of wastes is rated as adequate.



 BELLEVILLE PLATING COMPAKY is located in Van Buren Township,



 Wayne County.  Wastes originate from electroplating oper-



 ations and are discharged to Huron River.  Discharges are



 required to meet restrictions on acidity, alkalinity, oils,



 cyanide, toxic metals and sewage by a new use Order of



 Determination Issued by the Water Resources Commission on



 May 28, 1958.  Treatment and control methods necessary to



 meet the Order requirements were provided coincident with



 start of plating operations.  Sanitary sewage is disposed



 of by subsurface percolation methods on company premises



 with no direct discharge to the river.  Control of wastes



 is rated as adequate.



 THE BRIGGS MANUFACTURING COMPANY is located in Sterling

-------
                                                      285
Township, Maoomb County.  Wastes originate from stamping
and porcelain coating operations and are discharged to
Beaver Creek, a tributary of Clinton River,  A new use Order
of Determination issued by the Water Resources Commission
on September 19» 1936 establishes restrictions on acids and
alkalis, iron, oil and grease and settleable solids in the
process wastes discharges and prescribes quality of sani-
tary  sewage effluents.  Treatment and control methods neces-
sary  for compliance with the Order requirements were pro-
vided coincident with the start of operations*  Sanitary
sewage is treated in a secondary type plant with effluent
ohlorination provided on the company premises.  Adequacy
of waste control has not been fully demonstrated.
BUCKEYE PRODUCTS CORPORATION is located in the City of
Adrian,  Wastes originate from electroplating operations
and are discharged to the South Branch of Raisin River.  In
1953  the Water Resources Commission invoked the statutory
procedure to abate pollution created by the wastes.	   ~
A final Order of Determination issued on June 27, 1954
restricts the chromium, cyanide and copper content and
the acidity-alkalinity range of the discharges.  Action
to enforce compliance with the restrictions was taken in
Circuit Court in 1957 resulting in a Court Order restraining
the company from violating these requirements.  Treatment
and control methods necessary to meet these restrictions
are now In effect employing chemical oxidation of cyanide

-------
                                                      286



and ohemloal reduction of chromium and neutralization by



intermixing of aoid and alkaline wastes.  Sanitary sewage



is connected to the Adrian municipal system.  Control of



wastes is rated as adequate.



BURROTOHS CORPORATION is located in Plymouth Township,



Wayne County.  Disposal of wastes to Rouge River is limited



to cooling waters which are unchanged by the manufacturing



operations except for a rise in temperature.  Process



wastes and sanitary sewage are connected to the Wayne



County system.  Control of wastes is rated as adequate.



CHRYSLER CORPORATION operates five separate manufacturing



plants discharging wastes to the Detroit River and Clinton



River tributaries:



         The Cyoleweld Chemical Products Division and



Amplex Division are located in the City of Trenton.  The



Detroit River is used for disposal of cooling waters.  No



process wastes originating from the production of adheslves,



sealers, rust preventatives and powdered metal products



enter the river.  Sanitary sewage is connected to the



Wayne County system.  Control of wastes is rated as adequate.



         Defense Operations Division is located in Center



Line.  Wastes originate from the manufacture and assembly



of military equipment and are discharged to the Center Line



Relief Drain, a tributary to Bear Creek and the Clinton



River.  Discharges are required to meet restrictions on

-------
                                                      28?
acidity-alkalinity, cyanide, metallic ions, solids, oils
and sewage by a new use Order of Determination issued by
the Water Resources Commission on June 19, 1958,  Facilities
for treatment and control of substances originating in
electroplating operations were provided coincident with
the start of operations.  Primary type facilities for
treatment of sewage with effluent chlorination are presently
being operated but are to be abandoned in favor of a con-
nection to the Warren municipal system upon completion of
negotiations now under way.  Control of process wastes and
sewage is rated as inadequate, pending connection to muni-
cipal system as required by the Order.
         Michigan Missile Division is located in Sterling
Township, Macomb County.  Wastes originate from the electro-
plating, assembly and tasting of metal components for
missiles and are discharged to the Lockwood (or Moore)
Drain, a tributary to Red Run and the Clinton River.  Dis-
charges are required to meet restrictions on acidity-
alkalinity, solids, turbidity, cyanide,  toxic metals, oil
and greases and sanitary sewage by a new use Order of De-
termination issued by the Water Resources Commission on
December 16, 1952.  Treatment and control methods necessary
for compliance  with the Order requirements were provided
coincident with the start of operations*  Sanitary sewage
is treated in a secondary type plant on company premises with
                                                     GPO 82081»-B-8

-------
effluent ohlorination provided.  Control of wastes is rated



as adequate.



         The MoPar Plant is located in the City of Center



Line.  Wastes originate from automobile parts manufacturing



operations and are discharged to the Center Line Relief



Drain, a tributary to Bear Creek and the Clinton River.  All



process wastes and sanitary sewage are treated on the



plant premises in a  secondary type plant with effluent



chlorination.  Treatment facilities were provided coincident



with start of manufacturing operations.  Control of wastes



is rated as adequate.



         Trenton Engine Plant is located in Trenton.  Wastes



are produced from the machining and assembly of automobile



engines.  All process wastes are connected to the Wayne



county system after pretreatment for removal of oils.



Sanitary sewage is treated in the Wayne County system.



Use of the Detroit River for waste disposal is limited to



surface water runoff from the plant premises and cooling



waters which are unchanged in the process except for a rise



in  temperature.  Oil drainage from outdoor storage and



loading of waste metal  cuttings is collected and treated



prior to release to  the county sewer.   Control of wastes



is rated as adequate.



CONSOLIDATED PAPER COMPANY operates three paper manufactur-



ing plants within the City of Monroe,  all of which discharge

-------
                                                      289



waste to the Raisin River:



         North Side Division.  Wastes originate from the



manufacture of liner board from waste paper and corrugating



medium from straw.  Principal waste constituents are paper



and  straw solids in suspension, oxygen consuming substances



and  coliform group organisms.  Measures were taken upon



request of the Water Resources Commission in 1953 to reduce



the  content of suspended solids in the discharges.  Treatment



methods employed are coagulation and settling. Sanitary



sewage is segregated and connected to the Monroe municipal



system.  Adequate control of suspended solids has not been



demonstrated.  Oxygen consuming substances exceed assimilative



capacity of the river and seasonal oxygen depletion in the



lower river occurs.  No measures provided for control of



bacteria.  Straw processing operation is a major source of



coliform group bacteria.  Process is to be discontinued in



1962.



         South Side Division. Wastes originate from paper



board manufacturing operations.  Principal waste constituents



are  paper solids in suspension and oxygen consuming sub-



stances.  Measures were taken to control the paper solids



losses initially at the request of Michigan Stream Control



Commission and later to comply with requests of the Water



Resources Commission.  Restrictions on solids losses and



provisions for Installation of additional settling facilities

-------
                                                      290



were incorporated in a stipulation between the company nad



the Water Resources Commission in 1955.  A portion of the



facilities were rebuilt and expanded facilities Installed



in 1957.  Treatment performance was inconsistent until



1961 when major changes in manufacturing operations were



made.  Sanitary sewage is segregated and connected to the



Monroe municipal system.  Oxygen consuming substances ex-



ceed assimilative capacity of the river and season oxygen



depletion in the lower river occurs.



         West Side Plant.  Wastes are produced from the



manufacture of paperboard.  The principal waste constituents



are paper solids in suspension and oxygen demanding substan-



ces.  Measures for control of the paper solids were taken



following request of the Michigan Stream Control Commission



in 19^7.  Treatment and control methods in effect are



chemical coagulation followed by gravity separation.  About



three-quarters of treated wastes are re-used in the manu-



facturing operations.  Sanitary sewage is segregated and



connected to the Monroe municipal system.  Control of



the suspended solids is rated as adequate.  Adequacy of



control of oxygen consuming substances has not been fully



demonstrated.



CONTINENTAL MOTORS CORPORATION



         Novi Governor Division, located in the City of



Novi, conducts machining  and heat treating operations for

-------
                                                      291




production of automotive parts.  Wastes produced are dis-



charged to a small tributary of Rouge River.  The principal



waste constituents are oils, suspended solids and cyanide.



Waste control established at request of the Water Resources



Commission.  Treatment and control methods employed are



settling for solids removal, separation and burning of



oils removed by gravity methods and chemical oxidation of



cyanides.  Control of wastes is rated as adequate.



         THE CROSS COMPANY is located in the City of



Fraser.  Wastes originate from machine tool manufacturing



operations and are discharged to Sweeney Drain, a tributary



of Clinton River.  The new use Order of Determination issued



by the Water Resources Commission on January 26, 1956 estab-



lishes restrictions on oils and sanitary sewage.  Treatment



and control methods necessary for compliance with the



Order requirements were provided coincident with the start



of operations.  Secondary type facilities for treatment of



sewage with effluent chlorlnation are provided on company



premises.  Negotiations are under way to abandon the facil-



ity and connect sewage to Clinton Township system for



treatment.  Control of wastes Is rated as adequate.



         DANA CORPORATION is located in the City of Ecorse.



Wastes are produced from the forming and fabrication of



frames for automobiles.  An increases use Order of Deter-



mination issued by the Water Resources Commission in July,

-------
                                                      292



1950 establishes restrictions on the acid, alkali and oil



content of all wastes from this plant.  Treatment and



control methods required for compliance with the Order



requirements were provided coincident with the increased



use.  Sanitary sewage was segregated and connected to the



River Rouge municipal system in 1957 following request by



the Water Resources Commission.  Present operations produce



acid liquors only.  Liquors are hauled and disposed of by



contract.  Control of wastes is rated as adequate.



         DARLING AND COMPANY is located in the City of



Melvindale.  Wastes are produced from rendering operations



and are discharged to Rouge River.  The principal constit-



uents originating from the operations are fats, greases and



solids in suspension and oxygen consuming substances.  Con-



trol and treatment measures were initiated following a re-



quest by the Michigan Stream Control Commission in 19^6.



Settling and skimming methods are employed for removal of



solids, fats and greases from the discharges.  Effluents



are chlorinated. Sanitary sewage is connected to the Mel-



vindale municipal system.  Control of wastes is rated as



adequate.



         DETROIT EDISON COMPANY.  The steam electric portion



of the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant is located in French-



town Township, Monroe County, adjacent to the Power Reactor



Development Company's atomic power reactor.  Wastes origi-

-------
                                                      293
nating from electric power generating will be cooling
waters, demineralizing regenerants and sanitary sewage,
and will flow to Lake Erie via Swan Creek.  Restrictions
and conditions have been established on the alkalinity-
acidity range and on the chlorine and radioactivity content
of the cooling water discharges and on the quality of sewage
effluents by a new use Order of Determination issued Decem-
ber 6, 1956 by the Water Resources Commission.  Treatment
,and control facilities necessary to meet these restrictions
have  been completed.  Sanitary sewage is segregated and is
treated in a secondary type plant with ohlorination of
effluents provided on the premises.  Power production awaits
completion of atomic reactor (see Power Reactor Development
Company).
         DETROIT, TOLEDO AND IRONTON RAILROAD COMPANY
operates a railroad yard and repair shops in Brownstown
Township, Wayne County.  Wastes originate during the repair
and fueling of diesel engines and are discharged to Silver
Creek, a tributary to Huron River.  The principal waste con-
stituents are solids, oils 
-------
                                                      294



discharge to the creek.  Control of wastes is rated as



adequate.



         DUNDEE CEMENT COMPANY  is located in Dundee Town-



ship, Monroe County.  Wastes are produced from the quarrying



of rock and production of cement, and are discharged to



Macon Creek, a tributary of Raisin River.  Restrictions have



been established on the alkalinity-acidity range, on the



content of settleable solids in the discharges and on the



quality of sanitary sewage effluents by a new use Order



of Determination issued by the Water Resources Commission,



September 23, 1958.  Methods provided for control of process



wastes coincident with start of operations have not been



adequate to meet restrictions Imposed.  Corrective measures



have recently been installed.  Sanitary sewage is treated



by secondary processes with effluent chlorination.  Control



of wastes is rated as adequate,  pending;  appraisal of per-



formance by Water Resources Commission staff survey.



         E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY



         Industrial and Biochemlcals Division is located in



the City of Ecorse.  Operations for manufacture of sulphuric



acid produce cooling waters which flow to Detroit River.



Cooling is by the indirect method and the waters used are



normally unaffected by the process operations except for



rise in temperature.  Discharges are required to meet re-



strictions on acidity-alkalinity range and on sanitary sew-

-------
                                                      295
age disposal by an increased use Order of Determination
issued by the Water Resources Commission on May 22, 1957.
Prevention of product leaks is maintained by control devices
installed in the process. Sanitary sewage is settled and
disposed of by subsurface percolation methods on the plant
premises with no direct discharge to the river.  Control of
wastes is rated as adequate.
         EVANS PRODUCTS COMPANY is located in Plymouth Town-
ship, Wayne County, and uses Rouge River for disposal of
ccbling waters and surface runoff from the premises.  Cooling
waters are unaffected by the process operations except for
temperature increase.  Sanitary sewage and process wastes
are connected to municipal sewers.  Control of wastes is
rated as adequate.
         FEDERAL SCREW PRODUCTS CORPORATION is located in
the City of Chelsea.  Wastes consist of oils and cooling
waters resulting from the operation of screw machines.  The
oils are collected and disposed of by commercial waste oil
contractors.  Cooling waters are discharged to a city-owned
storm drain connected to Letts Creek, a tributary of the
Huron River.  Sanitary waste is treated in the municipal
plant.  Control of wastes is rated as adequate.
         FIRESTONE TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY
         The Firestone Steel Products Division is located
in the City of Rivenrview and discharges wastes to the Trenton

-------
                                                      296



Channel of Detroit River.  Wastes are produced from the



fabrication of metals Into wheels and tire rims.  The prin-



cipal waste constituents produced from these operations  are



acid and .alkaline liquors and oils.  Measures for control



of these constituents were initially undertaken following



request of the Michigan Stream Control Commission in 19^7.



Treatment and control measures now in effect are gravity



separation, waste equalization and settling for oil bearing



wastes and miscellaneous process wastes and controlled re-



lease of acids with neutralization through diffusion with



Detroit River water.  Sanitary sewage segregated and con-



nected to the Wayne County system.  Control of wastes is



rated as adequate.



         FORD MOTOR COMPANY conducts operations at nine



locations which discharge wastes to watercourses in the



Clinton, Rouge, Huron and Raisin River Basins:



         The Chassis Parts Machining Plant is located



in Sterling Township, Macomb County.  Wastes originate from



gear machining operations and are discharged to a county



drain tributary to Clinton River.  A new use Order of De-



termination issued by the Water Resources Commission, Aug-



ust 25, 1955, establishes restrictions on acid, turbidity,



suspended solids, iron, oil and oxygen content of the pro-



cess wastes and on the quality of sewage effluents.  Treat-



ment and control methods, necessary for compliance with the

-------
                                                      297
Order requirements, were provided coincident with the start
of operations.  Sanitary sewage is treated in a secondary
type plant with chlorination of the effluent.  Process
waste control performance was impaired in I960 and additional
facilities were installed.  Adequacy has not been fully dem-
onstrated.  Treatment of sewage rated as adequate.
         The Engineering Proving. Ground  is located in
Bruce Township, Macomb County.  Wastes originate from oper-
ation of an automobile proving ground and are discharged to
Pisher Creek, a tributary of Clinton River.  A new use Order
of Determination issued by the Water Resources Commission,
January 26, 1956, established restrictions on the oil and
solids content of the cooling water discharges and on the
quality of sanitary sewage effluents.  Treatment and control
methods necessary for compliance with the Order requirements
were provided coincident with the start of operations.  San-
itary sewage is treated in a secondary type plant with chlor-
ination of the effluent.  Control of wastes is rated as
adequate.
         The Lincoln Division is located in the City of
Wixom.  Wastes originate from automobile assembly operations
and are discharged to Norton Creek, a tributary of Huron
River.  A new use Order of Determination, issued by the Water
Resources Commission, April 26, 1956, establishes restrictions
on acids, solids, oils, toxic and oxygen consuming sub-

-------
                                                      298



stances and on sewage disposal.  Treatment and control meth-



ods necessary for compliance with the Order requirements



were provided coincident with the start of operations.



Sanitary sewage is treated in a secondary type plant with



chlorination of the effluent.  Control of wastes is rated



as adequate.



         The Monroe Plant is located in the Gity of Monroe.



Wastes originate from electroplating operations and are



discharged to the Raisin River.  The principal waste con-



stituents are cyanide, copper, nickel, chromium and zinc.



Measures for control of these constituents were initially



taken at the request of the Water Resources Commission;



subsequently on April 26, 1956 restrictions on the waste



discharges were formally established by an increased use



Order of Determination issued by the Water Resources Com-



mission.  Treatment and control methods now in effect con-



sist of diluting weak rinse waters and chemical treatment



and sedimentation of concentrated baths prior to discharge



to the river.  Sanitary sewage is treated on plant premises



in a primary type plant with effluent chlorination.  Con-



trol of wastes is rated as adequate.



         The Northville Plant is located in Northville.  Use



of Rouge River for waste disposal is limited to cooling



waters from a valve manufacturing operation.  Sanitary sew-



age is connected to the Wayne County system.  V/aste control

-------
                                                      299
is rated adequate.
         The Rouge Plant is located in the City of Dearborn
and discharges wastes to the Rouge River.  Wastes originate
from Integrated automobile manufacturing and assembly oper-
ations which include blast furnaces, coke ovens, steel rol-
ling, metal casting, machining and fabrication.  The prin-
cipal waste constituents produced from these operations are
solids in suspension, lubricating oils and greases, acids,
phenols and ammonia.  Measures were taken initially to con-
trol these constituents at the request of the Michigan
Stream Control Commission and later to comply with requests
or Orders of the Water Resources Commission.  Phenol, am-
monia and cyanide wastes created by subsequent expansion of
the coke ovens were placed under restrictions by an increased
use Order of Determination issued by the Water Resources
Commission, November 12, 1952.  Treatment and control methods
now In effect consist of settling and skimming for removal of
solids and oils from rolling mill wastes, settling for re-
moval of solids from blast furnace wastes and deep well dis-
posal of coke oven wastes.  Control of free and soluble oils
in wastes from machining operations is accomplished by puri-
fication and reclamation for re-use, supplemented by chemical
treatment of the portions discarded to the sewers.  Skimming
and reclamation methods are employed for removal of oils
from a creek carrying the combined wastes from a large portioi)

-------
                                                      300
of the plant.  Control of acid liquors Is limited to that
resulting from dilution with other process waste and cooling
water discharges.  Sanitary  sewage is segregated and con-
nected to the Dearborn municipal system.  Control of sewage,
cyanides and solids is rated as adequate.  Adequacy of con-
trol of phenol and oil wastes has not been fully demonstrated.
Acid wastes are rated as being uncontrolled and are under
continuing surveillance by the Water Resources Commission
to determine the need for control.
         The Utica Plant is located in Shelby Township,
Macomb County.  Plant only recently acquired by company.
No manufacturing operations being carried on at present.
Change-over to dry processing operations currently under
way.  Secondary type sewage treatment plant with effluent
ohlorination available when needed.
         The Wayne Plant is located in Nankin Township,
Wayne County, and discharges wastes to the Rouge River.
Wastes consist of oils and paint solids produced in as-
sembly plant operations.  Paint sludges are treated prior
to discharge by a gravity type oil-water separator.  San-
itary sewage Is discharged to the Wayne County System.
Waste control is rated as adequate.
         The Ypsllanti Plant is located in the City of
Ypsilantl and discharges wastes to the Huron River. Wastes
consist  of acids, oils and cooling waters  produced in the

-------
                                                      301



manufacture of automotive parts and accessories.  Treatment



facilities were provided at the request of the Water Re-



sources Commission and consist of neutralization and oil



recovery*  Sanitary sewage is discharged to the Ypsilantl



municipal system.  Waste control is rated as adequate.



         FUEL OIL CORPORATION Is located in the City of



River Rouge.  Wastes originate from the operation of facil-



ities for the storage and transportation of petroleum pro-



ducts.  Disposal of wastes is to a boat slip connected to the



Detroit River.  The principal constituent in the wastes



produced are products arising from cleaning of petroleum



cargo ships.  Control measures were installed Initially at



the  request of the Michigan Stream Control Commission.



Methods employed consist of retention, separation and



skimming,   using holding basins and a gravity type oil-water



separator.  Sanitary sewage is disposed of by subsurface



percolation methods on the company premises with no direct



discharge to the river.  Control of wastes is rated as ade-



quate.



         GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION conducts operations at



four locations which discharge wastes to watercourses in



the  Rouge and Huron River Basins.



         The Detroit Diesel Engine Division located in the



City of Detroit uses the Rouge River for disposal of surface



runoff from the premises.  The oil content of the runoff is

-------
                                                      302



controlled by a gravity type oil-water separator.  Sanitary



sewage and process wastes are connected to the Detroit



system.  Control of wastes Is rated as adequate.



         The Detroit Diesel Engine Division located In



Romulus Township, Wayne County, uses the Rouge River for



disposal of treated sewage effluents.  Treatment is of the



secondary type with chlorination of the effluents.  Control



of wastes is rated as adequate.



         The Detroit Transmission Division is located ad-



jacent to Willow Run Airport in Ypsilanti Township, Wash-



tenaw County.   Wastes originate from automobile trans-



mission manufacturing and assembly operations.  Willow Run,



a tributary of Huron River, is used for disposal of oil



bearing wastes.  Control is provided by two gravity type



oil-water separators, coupled with chemical treatment



measures within the plant.  Sanitary sewage is segregated



and connected to the Ypsilanti Township system.  Control of



wastes is rated as adequate.



         The Fisher Body Division is located adjacent to



Willow Run Airport in Ypsilanti Township, Washtenaw County,



Wastes originate from automobile body assembly operations



and are discharged to Willow Run, a tributary of Huron



River.  A new use Order of Determination issued by the



Water Resources Commission on February 26, 1959 establishes



restrictions on acids, settleable solids, chromium, oils and

-------
                                                      303
greases,  and  oxygen  consuming substances and  on the dis-
posal  of  sanitary sewage.   Treatment  and control methods
necessary for compliance with the Order requirements were
provided  coincident  with the start of operations.  Sanitary
sewage is segregated and connected to the Ypsilanti Town-
ship system.   Control of wastes is rated as adequate.
          GREAT LAKES STEEL CORPORATION operates three manu-
facturing plants discharging wastes to the Detroit River.
          The  Blast Furnace Division is located on Zug Island
in  the City of River Rouge.  It comprises blast furnaces and
a by-product  coke oven.  The principal waste  constituents
originating in the operations are iron, limestone and coke
particles in  suspension, phenols, cyanides, ammonia and
sanitary  sewage.  Measures for control of these constituents
were taken initially at  the request of the Michigan Stream
Control Commission;  subsequently on November  28, 1951 re-
strictions on waste  discharges were formally  established
by a new  use  Order of Determination issued by the Michigan
Water  Resources Commission.  Treatment and control methods
now in effect  consist of settling for removal of solids and
solvent extraction for removal of phenols with evaporation
of the  residual effluents.  Sanitary  sewage is segregated
and is discharged  to Detroit River after being settled and
chlorinated in facilities  provided on the plant premises.
Waste  control  has  been rated as adequate, but a decrease in
                                                    GPO 820819_B_9

-------
                                                      304



the removal of solids from the blast furnace wastes has



been observed recently.  Request has been made of the manage-1



ment for corrective action.



         The Ecorse Rolling Mills are located at Tecumseh



Road in the City of Ecorse.  Wastes originate from the rol-



ling of steel into sheets, bars and structural shapes.  The



principal constituents in the waste are iron solids in sus-



pension, lubricating oils and greases, sulphuric acid



liquors and sanitary sewage.  Measures were taken initially



to control these constituents at the request of the Michigan



Stream Control Commission.  Wastes created by subsequent ex-



pansion of rolling mill capacity were placed under restrictions



of a new use Order of Determination issued by the Water



Resources Commission, November 28, 1951.  Treatment and con-



trol methods now in effect consist of settling and skimming



in scale pits and in oil-water separators for removal of



solids and oils and controlled release of acid liquors



using mill cooling waters for neutralization.  Sanitary



sewage Is segregated, part being connected to the Wayne



County system and the remainder being settled and chlori-



nated in facilities on plant premises before discharge to



Detroit River.  Control of sewage  is rated as adequate.



Acid waste discharges are under continuing surveillance



by Water Resources Commission to determine need for control



beyond that presently provided.  Control of oil vjastes has

-------
                                                       305
 not been fully established.
          The Hot Strip Mill is located in the City of River
 Rouge.  Waste discharges are required to meet restrictions
 on acidity-alkalinity, oils, suspended solids, color, tur-
 bidity and sewage by new use Order of Determination issued by
 the Water Resources Commission on June 25, 1959.  Treatment
 and control methods for settling and skimming of process
 wastes placed in effect coincident with start of mill oper-
ations in 1961.  Sanitary sewage is segregated and connected
 to the Wayne County system.  Waste control has been satis-
 factory during early operations.
          HIGBIE MANUFACTURING COMPANY  is located in the
 Village of Rochester and uses Paint Creek, a tributary to
 the Clinton River, for disposal of uncontaminated cooling
 waters.  No industrial process wastes are produced.  Sani-
 tary sewage is connected to the Rochester municipal system.
 Control of waste is rated as adequate.
          HOME CANNING COMPANY is located in the Village of
 Blissfield.  Wastes resulting from the canning of tomatoes
 and squash are discharged seasonally into the Raisin River
 via the Pollard Drain.  Measures taken to reduce solids and
 oxygen consuming characteristics of process wastes have been
 largely ineffective.  Treatment and disposal system consists
 of screening, a lagoon and spray Irrigation system utilized
 either singly or in combination.  Sanitary sewage is con-

-------
                                                      306



neeted to the Blissfield municipal system.  Waste control



is rated incomplete.



         HOOVER BALL AND BEARING operates two manufacturing



plants which discharge waste to watercourses in the Raisin



River Basin:



         The Ann Arbor Plant is located in Pittsfield Town-



ship, Washtenaw County.  Wastes are produced from the assembly



of bearings and are discharged to a county drain tributary



to the Raisin River.  Restrictions on the waste discharges



were established by a new use Order of Determination issued



by the Water Resources Commission on February 28, 1957.



A secondary type sewage treatment plant with chlorination



was placed in operation coincident with the start of manu-



facturing operations.  Soluble oils are hauled to a dis-



posal site for ponding and disposal by percolation.  Con-



trol of wastes is rated as adequate.



         Universal Die Casting Division is located in



Saline.  Wastes originate from electroplating operations



and are discharged to the Saline River, a tributary to the



Raisin River.  In 1952 the Water Resources Commission in-



voked the statutory procedure to abate pollution created by



the wastes.  A Final Order of Determination issued on Feb-



ruary 25, 1953 restricted the cyanide, copper, chromium



content and the acidity-alkalinity range of discharges.



Wastes created by subsequent expansion of plating oper-

-------
                                                      307
atIons were placed under restriction by an increased use
Order of Determination issued by the Water Resources Com-
mission on March 25, 1959.  Treatment and control methods
now in effect consist of the destruction of cyanide by
chlorlnatlon and the precipitation and settling of the metal
components.  Sanitary sewage is segregated and connected to
the Saline municipal system.  Control of wastes is ra*ed as
adequate.
         KURD LOCK AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY is located in
the City of Adrian.  Wastes originate from electroplating
operations and are discharged to the South Branch of
Raisin River.  In 1953 the Water Resources Commission in-
voiced the statutory procedure against the company to abate
pollution created by the wastes.  A Final Order of Deter-
mination issued on January 27, 195^ restricts the chro-
mium, copper and cyanide content and the acidity-alkalinity
range of discharges.  Waste treatment and control measures
necessary to meet these restrictions are now available em-
ploying chemical oxidation of cyanide, chemical reduction
and precipitation of chromium and neutralization by inter-
mixing acid and alkaline wastes.  Sanitary sewage is con-
nected to the Adrian municipal system.  Adequacy of per-
formance in maintaining constituents at levels specified
has not been fully demonstrated.
         KING-SEELEY Corporation conducts electroplating

-------
                                                      308
operations at a plant in Solo Township, Washtenaw County.
Wastes originating from the process are discharged to Huron
River.  Discharges are required to meet restrictions on
acidity-alkalinity range, metallic ions and cyanides by an
increased use Order of Determination issued by the Water
Resources Commission on September  29, 1955.  Treatment and
control methods necessary to meet the Order requirements
were in effect coincident with the increase in waste dis-
charges.  Facilities necessary to comply with the Order re-
quirements on sanitary sewage disposal have been provided
employing secondary type treatment with effluent disin-
fection.  Control of wastes is rated as adequate.
         KOPPERS COMPANY, INC.
         The Tar Products Division is located in the City
of Wyandotte.  Use of Detroit River for  waste disposal
is limited to cooling waters which are unchanged by the
process except for a rise in temperature.  Process wastes and
sanitary sewage are connected to the Wyandotte municipal
system.  Control of wastes is rated as adequate.
         LONGWORTH PLATING. COMPANY is located in the City
of Chelsea.  Wastes originate from electroplating oper-
ations and are discharged to a city-owned storm sewer trib-
utary to Letts Creek and the Huron River.  Principal waste
constituents consist of cyanide and metallic ions.  Control
was provided at the request of the Water Resources Commissiort

-------
                                                      309



and employs chemical oxidation and sedimentation methods.



Sanitary sewage is discharged to the Chelsea municipal system.



Control facilities have been found unreliable.



         MCLOtTTH STEEL CORPORATION  operates two manufactur-



ing plants discharging wastes to Detroit River:



         The Gibraltar Plant is located in the Village of



Gibraltar.  Wastes are produced from the steel rolling and



annealing operations and flow to Detroit River via the Frank



and Poet County Drain.  The principal waste constituents



originating from the operations are solids in suspension,



oils  and sanitary sewage.  Restrictions on these constituents



have  been established by a new use Order of Determination



issued  April 27, 1955 and a supplemental Order of Deter-



mination issued February 21, 1956 by the Water Resources



Commission.  Treatment and control methods required for com-



pliance with these Orders are in effect.  They consist of



settling for removal of solids and gravity separation of



oils  with the  aid of chemicals.  Sanitary sevjage is segre-



gated and connected to the Wayne County system.  Control of



wastes  is rated as adequate.



         The Trenton Plant is located  in the City of Trenton.



Wastes  are produced from  the operation of blast furnaces and



rolling mills. The principal waste constituents originating



from  the operations are iron, coke and limestone solids  in



suspension, lubricating oils and greases, sulphuric acid

-------
                                                      310



liquors and sanitary sewage.  Restrictions on these constit-



uents have been established by an increased use Order of



Determination issued on February 28, 1958 and a supplemental



Order of Determination issued August 26, I960 by the Water



Resources Commission.  Treatment facilities for process



wastes have been enlarged, revised and improved on several



occasions to seek compliance.  Major improvements were last



completed in 1961.  Control methods now employed consist of



settling for removal of suspended substances and skimming



for removal of floating oils.  Acid liquor in conjunction



with lime are used as a coagulant to aid in removal of sol-



ids with neutralization and  iron recovery being accomplished



in the process.  Operation  of the treatment system produces



control ranging  from excellent to inadequate.  Changes and



Improvements In  operating controls and techniques are con-



tinuing to be made to improve the quality  of the effluents.



Sanitary sewage  is segregated and connected to  the Wayne




County system.



         MERGRAF OIL PRODUCTS,  INC. is  located  in the City



of Northville.   Wastes  originating  from  the processing  of




waste  industrial oils  into  useable  products  are discharged



to Rouge River.  The principal  waste  constituent produced



from this  operation  is  free oil.  Control  methods  employed



are  equalization,  emulsion  breaking and  separating  by grav-



ity.   Effluents  are  occasionally aerated to  control odors.

-------
                                                      311
Adequacy of control has not been fully demonstrated.
         MICHIGAN SEAMLESS TUBE COMPANY is located In the
City of South Lyon.  Wastes resulting from the manufacture of
steel tubing consists mainly of uncontaminated cooling
waters which are discharged directly into the Yerkes Drain,
a tributary of Huron River.  Small volumes of acid liquors
are disposed of in a lagoon on company property.  Sanitary
sewage is connected to the South Lyon municipal system.
Control of wastes is rated as adequate.
         MILLS PRODUCTS, INC. is located in Canton Township,
Wayne County.  Wastes originate from electroplating oper-
ations and are discharged to the lower Rouge River.  Company
is operating under effluent restrictions stipulated to
between the predecessor company and Water Resources Com-
mission.  Treatment and control methods are provided to re-
strict the content of copper, nickel and chromium.  Control
of wastes is rated as adequate.
         MOBIL OIL COMPANY is located in the Village of
Woodhaven, Wayne County.  Wastes originate from the oper-
ation of an oil refinery and discharge to the Trenton
Channel of Detroit River.  Waste control measures were under-
taken initially at the request of the Michigan Stream
Control Commission and improved later to comply with the
requests of the Water Resources Commission.  Treatment and
control methods now in effect consist of retention, sepa-

-------
                                                       312



ration and skimming of the surface water runoff from the



 premises for removal of oils, separation and skimming of



 process wastes by gravity and pressure flotation type oil-



 water separators in series, and aeration for reduction of



 phenol bearing waste flows.  Chloride bearing waste dischargers



 created by the foz-mation of an underground cavity for stor-



 age of petroleum products are restricted by a new use Order



 of Determination issued by the Water Resources Commission,



 November 30, I960.  Sanitary sewage is disposed of by sub-



 surface percolation methods on company premises with no



 direct discharge to the river.  Control of oil wastes is



 rated as adequate.  Adequacy of control of phenolic sub-



 stances has not been fully demonstrated.



          MONROE AUTO EQUIPMENT COMPANY is located In the



 City of Monroe.  The principal waste constituents produced



 are chromium salts, soluble and free oils and cooling waters.,



 Chromium wastes are discharged to the municipal sewer system.



 Soluble oils are hauled away to a disposal site.  Free oil



 losses are controlled by recovery methods within the plant,



 although traces of oil are present on the cooling water



 discharges to Raisin River.  Sanitary sewage is segregated



 and connected to the Monroe municipal s/stern.  Adequate con-



 trol of oil losses has not been fully demonstrated.



          MONROE PAPER PRODUCTS COMPANY is located in the



 City of Monroe.  Wastes originate from the manufacture of

-------
                                                       313
 paperboard and are discharged to the Raisin River.   Wastes
 contain paper solids in suspension and oxygen demanding
 substances.  Facilities for removing the paper solids from
 the wastes were provided in 1939.  Treatment methods con-
 sist of chemical coagulation and sedimentation.   Varying
 quantities of the treated effluent are re-used in the manu-
 facturing  process.  Sanitary sewage is segregated  and
 connected to the Monroe municipal system.  Control  of the
 suspended solids is rated as adequate.  Adequacy  of control
 of oxygen consuming substances has not been fully demon-
 strated.
          MONSANTO CHEMICAL COMPANY is located in  the City
 of Trenton.  Wastes originate from the production of sod-
 ium phosphate and flow to the Trenton Channel of  Detroit
 River.   Settling by means of an earthen dyked basin is em-
 ployed  for removal of raw material and finished product
 solids  from the discharges.   Sanitary sewage has  been dis-
 posed of to the Wayne County system since prior to  1950.
 Control of wastes is rated as adequate.
          NATIONAL MACHINE PRODUCTS COMPANY  is located  in the,
 City of Utioa.  Wastes originate  from metal machining  oper-
 ations  and are discharged to Clinton River.   Discharges  are
 required  to meet restrictions established by a new  use
 Order of  Determination Issued by  the Water  Resources Com-
mission on October 25,  1956  limiting the  acidity-alkalinity

-------
                                                       314



 range, oil and solids content of the process wastes and  Im-



posing conditions on sanitary sewage disposal*  Treatment



 and control measures necessary to meet the requirements  of



 the Order are In effect.  Sanitary sewage is to the Utica



 municipal system.  Control of wastes is rated as adequate.



          NATIONAL TWIST DRILL COMPANY is located in Avon



 Township, Oakland County.  Wastes produced from the manu-



 facture of twist drills, reamers, milling cutters and special



 carbide tools are discharged into an unnamed watercourse



 tributary to Stony Creek.  Measures were taken at the re-



 quest of the Water Resources Commission in 1950 to reduce



 oil content of waste discharges and to eliminate dumping of



 spent cyanide heat-treating  salts.  Treatment system con-



 sists of a tile underdralned lagoon equipped with an oil



 skimming device.  Soluble oils are  "broken" with caustic.



 Heat-treat wastes are hauled by a  commercial contractor



 for treatment.  Waste control is considered adequate.



          PARKE-DAVIS AND COMPANY is located  in the City



 of Detroit.  Wastes originate from the manufacture of



 pharmaceutical products.  The principal waste constituents



 are suspended solids, acids, caustics and dyes.  At  the



 request  of the Michigan Stream Control Commission  all



 process  waste and  sanitary  sewage discharges were  connected



 to the Detroit municipal  system  in  19^7.  Present  discharges



 to the Detroit River consist of  cooling waters which are  un-

-------
                                                      315
affected  by  the process except for a rise in temperature.
Control of wastes  is  rated as adequate.
          PENINSULAR PAPER COMPANY is located in the City
of Ypsilantl.  Wastes are produced from the manufacture of
paper, using purchased pulp as raw material and are dis-
charged to Huron River.  Principal waste constituents orig-
inating in the operations are suspended paper fiber and dyes*
Fiber losses are controlled by recirculation and recovery
methods applied to the paper machine white waters with no
formalized treatment  being employed.  Adequacy of waste
control has  not been  fully demonstrated.
          PENNSALT  CHEMICALS CORPORATION operates two separ-
ate manufacturing  plants discharging wastes to the Detroit
River:
          The East  Side Plant is located in Wyandotte.   The
principal waste constituents produced are inert calcium and
magnesium salts in suspension and ammonia and sodium salts
in solution. Measures for control of these constituents are
limited to production practices applied within the plant.
Following request  of  the Michigan Stream Control Commission
in 1947 all  sanitary  sewage discharges and certain indus-
trial process wastes  were routed to the Wyandotte municipal
system for treatment.  Control is considered adequate.
         The West  Side Plant Is located in Riverview and
discharges wastes  to  Monguagon Creek, a tributary to the
Trenton Channel of the Detroit River.  Wastes originate

-------
                                                      316



from the manufacture of a variety of organic chemical prod-



ucts.  The principal constituents in the wastes produced



are phenol, oil, caustic and solids.  Measures to control



these constituents were taken initially at the request of



the Michigan Stream Control Commission and later improvements



were made at the request of the Water Resources Commission.



Treatment and control methods now in effect are gravity



separation, settling and skimming for removal of oils and



solids; equalization for neutralization of caustics; and



restriction of phenol losses through process controls.  Sani-



tary sewage is segregated and connected to the Wayne County



system.  Adequacy of process waste controls has not been



fully demonstrated.



         PETROLEUM SPECIALTIES CORPORATION is located in



Brownstowh Township, Wayne County.  Wastes containing oils



and greases are producedfrom petroleum refining operations.



An earthen lagoon with  a skimming device  is provided to



remove  oils and grease  prior to discharge to Silver Creek,



a tributary of the Huron River.  Adequacy of control has



not been fully demonstrated.



         POWER REACTOR  DEVELOPMENT COMPANY  Is  located  In



Frenchtown Township, Monroe County.  Wastes will be pro-



duced upon start  of  operation of a  fast breeder nuclear re-



actor sometime  In late  1962 at the Enrico Fermi Atomic  Power



Plant.  Discharges will flow to Lake Erie via Swan Creek.

-------
                                                       317



 Restrictions and conditions have been established on chro-



ntLum, oil, solids and radionuclide content of the discharges




 and on sanitary sewage by a new use Order of Determination



 issued June 22, 1961 by the Water Resources Commission.




 Treatment and control facilities necessary to meet these



 restrictions have been completed and are in readiness to



 operate.  Sanitary sewage is collected in a separate system



 which is connected to secondary type facilities with efflu-



 ent chlorination operated by Detroit Edison Company's ad-



 joining steam electric generating plant.



          REVERE COPPER AND BRASS, INC. is located in the



 City of Detroit.  Wastes are produced from copper and brass




 rolling operations and are discharged to Detroit River.



 At the request of the Michigan Stream Control Commission




 in 1946, measures were instituted to neutralize acids, to



 restrict oils and to eliminate raw sewage discharges.  Con-



 trol of oil wastes is accomplished by a series of gravity



 type oil-water separators Installed within the plant.  Seg-




 regation of sanitary sewage and connection to the Detroit



 system was provided in 1948.  Control of wastes is rated




 as adequate.



          REYNOLDS CHEMICAL PRODUCTS COMPANY is located




 in Northfield Township, Washtenaw County.  Wastes are pro-



 duced from manufacture of plastic products and flow to



 Horseshoe Lake Cutlet Drain, a tributary of Huron River.

-------
                                                      318



A new use Order of Determination issued by the Water Re-



sources Commission July 24, 1958 restricts the discharges



to cooling waters which have not come into contact with



substances used in the process, establishes a limit on the



temperature of these waters and places requirements on dis-



posal of sanitary sewage.   Control of sewage discharges is



accomplished by subsurface percolation methods  on company



premises with no direct discharge to the drain.  Control of



wastes is rated as adequate.



         ROBIN PRODUCTS COMPANY is located in the City of



Warren.  Wastes are produced from mechanical plating oper-



ations and are discharged to the Fogg Drain, a tributary



to the Clinton River.  Discharges are required to meet re-



strictions on acidity-alkalinity range, chromium, copper,



zinc, oil and solids by a new use Order of Determination



issued by the Water Resources Commission on June 22, 1961.



Treatment and control methods necessary to meet the Order



requirements were provided coincident with start of plating



operations.  Sanitary sewage is disposed of by subsurface



percolation on company premises with no direct discharge to



the drain.  Control of wastes is rated as adequate.



         ROCHESTER PAPER COMPANY is located in the Village



of Rochester.  Wastes produced from the manufacture of



absorbant type papers are discharged into the Clinton River.



Measures were taken prior to 1950 to reduce fiber losses thrqugh

-------
                                                      319
an "in plant" program of water conservation and re-use.
Sanitary sewage is connected to the Rochester municipal
system.  Control of wastes is rated as adequate.
         ROCKWELL-STANDARD CORPORATION
         Chelsea Spring Division is located in Chelsea and
dischargesuncontamdnated cooling water to Letts Creek, trib-
utary to Huron River.  No other industrial wastes are pro-
duced.  Sanitary sewage is discharged to the Chelsea muni-
cipal system.  Waste control Is rated as adequate.
         SCOTT PAPER COMPANY is located in the City of De-
troit.  Wastes originate from Integrated sulphite pulp and
paper manufacturing operations and are discharged to the
Old Channel of Rouge River.  Principal waste constituents
are pulp and paper solids in suspension, acid sulphite
liquors in solution and oxygen consuming substances.  Con-
trol methods employed are limited to reduction of paper
fiber losses to the extent they can be recovered and re-
used.  The Water Resources Commission examined the waste
problems at a conference with the Company in April, 1956.
Action was tabled pending further developments that would
support the need for more extensive control.
         SHAWINIGAN RESINS CORPORATION is located in the
City of Trenton.  Wastes are produced from the manufacture
of vinyl acetate type resins and are discharged to Detroit
River.  The principal constituents are sulphuric and acetic
                                                   GPO 820819—B-IO

-------
                                                      320



acid and traces of organic solvents.  Restrictions on these



substances have been established by a new use Order of De-



termination issued January 26, 1956 by the Water Resources



Commission.  Control facilities necessary to comply with the



Order requirements were installed coincident with start of



operations and consist of distillation units for recovery of



solvents and neutralization of acids.  Sanitary sewage is



connected to the Wayne County system.  Control of wastes



is rated as adequate.



         SIMPLEX PAPER COMPANY is located in Palmyra Town-



ship, Lenawee County.  Wastes are produced from the pro-



duction of building paper and are discharged to the Raisin



River.  The principal waste constituents are paper solids,



clay and coloring materials in suspension and oxygen de-



manding substances.   In 1949 the Water Resources Commission



invoiced the statutory procedure to  abate pollution created



by these wastes.  A Final Order of  Determination issued on



November 22, 1949 restricts the suspended solids content



of the discharges.  Treatment and control methods necessary



to meet these restrictions are now  in effect employing chemical



treatment and an air flotation type of recovery system.   Con*



trol of wastes  is rated as adequate.



         SPARTAN PRODUCTS, INC. is  located  in the City of



Madison Heights.  No Industrial wastes are  produced  from



company's operations which consist  of casting plastic  foam.

-------
                                                      321



A new use Order of Determination adopted by the Water Re-



sources Commission in December, 1959 establishes restriction*



on sanitary  sewage discharged to Red Run Drain, a tributary



of Clinton River.  To meet the ordered restriction, second-



ary treatment and chlorination of the sewage were provided



coincident with the start of manufacturing operations. Con-



trol of wastes is rated as adequate.



         TECUMSEH PRODUCTS COMPANY is located in the City of



Tecumseh and is engaged in manufacturing refrigeration com-



pressors and condensing units.  Industrial wastes consist



solely of cooling waters which are discharged into the



North Branch of the Raisin River.  Sanitary sewage is con-



nected to the Tecumseh municipal system.  Control of wastes



is rated as adequate.



         TERNES STEEL COMPANY is located in the City of



Roseville.  Wastes are produced from cleaning and painting



of steel parts.  The principal waste constituents are phos-



phoric acid cleaners and paint solids.  Discharges are re-



quired to meet restrictions on acidity-alkalinity range, oil



solids, toxic material and oxygen consuming substances by a new



use Order of Determination issued by the Water Resources



Commission on August 27, 1959.  Process wastes and sanitary



sewage are discharged to a township sanitary sewer system



for treatment.  Uncontaminated cooling waters are discharged



to Sweeney Drain, a tributary to the Clinton River.  Waste

-------
                                                      322



control is rated as adequate.



         THOMPSON RAMO WOOLDRIDGE, INC.



         Thompson Products Michigan Division is located in



Sterling Township, Macomb County.  Wastes are produced by



machining and fabricating operations and are discharged



to Beaver Creek, a tributary to the Clinton River.  A new



use Order of Determination Issued by the Water Resources



Commission on December 7, 1955 establishes restrictions on



acidity-alkalinity, oil and grease, toxic chemicals and



sanitary sewage.  A secondary type plant for treatment of



sewage was provided coincident with the start of manu-



facturing.  Operation of treatment plant proved unsatis-



factory because of oil losses to  system.  Water Resources



Commission requested installation of oil recovery equip-



ment which was provided in 1957.  Additional industrial



treatment facilities were provided in  late 1961 to comply



with the Order of Determination.  Adequacy of waste con-



trols not fully demonstrated.



         TRILEX CORPORATION  is located  inCanton Township,



Wayne County.  Wastes originate from electroplating of auto-



motive hardware and are discharged to  a county drain trib-



utary to Rouge plver.  Principal  waste  constituents pro-



duced from the operations are metallic  ions and cyanides.



Treatment and control methods were initiated in 1956 at the



request of the Michigan Water Resources Commission.  Treat-

-------
                                                      323



merit and control measures consist of chemical oxidation of



cyanides and chemical precipitation and settling of metallic




ions.  Sanitary sewage has been disposed of by subsurface



percolation on company premises with no direct outlet to



river.  Control of wastes is rated as adequate.



         UNION BAG-CAMP PAPER CORPORATION




         River Raisin Paper Company Division is located in



the City of Monroe.  Wastes originate from the manufacture



of boxboard and are discharged to the Raisin River.  The



principal waste constituents are paper solids in suspension




and oxygen consuming substances.  Measures for removing the



paper  solids from the wastes were taken initially following



request by Michigan Stream Control Commission in 19^8 and




later  additions were made at the request of the Water Re-



sources Commission.  Treatment and control methods now in




effect are chemical coagulation followed by gravity set-




tling  for solids removal.  Varying quantities of treated




effluent are re-used in the manufacturing operations.




Sanitary sewage is segregated and connected to the Monroe



municipal system.  Control of the suspended solids is rated




as adequate.  Oxygen consuming substances exceed assimilative



capacity of the river and seasonal oxygen depletion occurs




in the lower river.



         U. S. GYPSUM COMPANY is located in the City of




River Rouge.  Wastes are produced from the manufacture of

-------
                                                      324



gypsum board and flow to Rouge River.  Operations produce



no process wastes.  Sanitary sewage is segregated and con-



nected to the municipal system.  Control of wastes is rated



as adequate.



         U. S. RUBBER COMPANY is located in the City of



Detroit.  Wastes are produced from rubber tire manufacturing



operations and are discharged to Detroit River.  The prin-



cipal waste constituents originating from these operations



are inert solids in suspension and lubricating oils and



greases.  Measures for control of these constituents and for



elimination of raw sewage discharges were initiated follow-



ing a request by the Michigan Stream Control Commission in



1946.  Control of solids and oils has been accomplished



through reduction of wastes at the source.  Sanitary sewage



segregated and connected to the Detroit system since 194?.



Control of wastes is rated as adequate.



         WOLVERINE FABRICATING & MANUFACTURING COMPANY is



located in the Village of Dundee.  Wastes resulting from



the manufacture of paper are discharged into the Raisin



River.  A new use Order adopted by the Water Resources Com-



mission in September, 1954 establishes restrictions on pH,



suspended solids, chemical compounds and sanitary sewage.



Facilities necessary for compliance provided coincident with



the start of manufacturing operations.  Control of wastes



was rated as adequate in 1961.  Manufacturing operations

-------
                                                      325
have recently been suspended.
         WYAND01TE CHEMICALS CORPORATION operates two plants
in Wyandotte which discharge wastes to the Detroit River.
         North Plant produces wastes from the operation of a
by-product coke oven plant and the manufacture of soda ash
and allied inorganic chemicals and synthetic detergents.
The principal wastes constituents are inert calcium carbon-
ate solids in suspension, phenol, ammonia and chlorides in
solution and oils.  Oil and ammonia are controlled by re-
covery methods employing gravity type oil-water separators
in the plant.  Solids and phenol are discharged to waste
beds on Fighting Island.  Effluents from the bed discharge
to the Detroit River.  At the request of the Michigan Stream
control Commission the sanitary sewage was segregated and
connected to the Wayne County system in 19^9.  Control of
wastes is rated as adequate.
         South Plant produces wastes from the manufacture of
soda ash and allied inorganic chemicals and glycol.  The
principal waste constituents are inert calcium carbonate
solids in suspension, ammonia and chlorides in solution and
oils.  Following request of Michigan Stream Control Com-
mission measures were taken in 19^9 to reduce oil losses and
to eliminate sanitary sewage discharges.  Solids discharges
are treated in waste beds on Fighting Island.  Effluents
from the beds discharge to the Detroit River.  Control of oil

-------
                                                       326

 and ammonia Xosses is maintained by operating procedures

 within the plant.  Sanitary sewage is segregated and  con-

 nected to the Wayne County system.  Control of wastes is

 rated  as adequate.



     CHAPTER IV.   ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND WORK TO BE DONE.

          The success of the Commission and Health Department

 staff  effort combined with that of the Commission member

 agencies in curbing pollution over the years prior to 1955

 was attested to  by Mark Hollis, Assistant Surgeon General

 of  the Public Health Service.  This was on the occasion of

 a meeting of the Federal Water Pollution Control Advisory

 Board  in Midland, August 25-26, 1955.  More recently,

 Governor John B. Swainson said in his letter of December

 5,  1961 to H. E. and W. Secretary Ribicoff "The Michigan

 Water  Resources  Commission, our water pollution control

 agency, has compiled an exemplary record of pollution

 abatement throughout the state."
f
          The success which accompanied the administrative

 efforts and such delays as have been encountered is the

 product of many  factors.  Only a few can be mentioned here.

 Coordination and correlation of effort between Commission

 and member agency heads and their respective staffs have

 been of first importance where statutes such as those in


 Michigan exist.   Hours of fact finding, counseling, per-

-------
                                                        32?
  suasion and attempts at education through public  meetings
  and other means have brought  results in many instances.
  The exercise of procedures authorized by statute  has been
  next in order.  The Health Commissioner may and does with-
  hold construction permits for new public sewer systems or
  extensions to existing systems where adequate provision
  has not been made for treatment.   Conferences to  show cause
  why pollution should not be abated may and are held before
  the Commission.  New or increased pollution has been pre-
  vented by Orders of Determination and existing pollution
  has been abated by Final Orders of Determination, both
  issued by the Commission pursuant to its statutory author-
  ity.    Orders and Agreements of  the State Health Commis-
  sioner have been equally effective in accomplishing these
  ends.  When compliance is not forthcoming by the  adminis-
  trative tools at hand, the Commission and Health  Depart-
  ment seek enforcement in the Courts through referral of the
  defaulted Order, or Agreement, to the Attorney General.
           The principal factor in  delay is the financing
  problem which always exists to some extent in municipal-
  ities but is a severe problem in  many urbanized,  unincor-
  porated areas.
           Many municipalities have defaulted In recent years,
apparently -co invite the settling of a Court Order  upon them.
  This relieves local officials of  responsibility and makes

-------
                                                      328



subsequent financing of the necessary facilities automatic



under the provisions of Act 320, P.A. 1927.  Port Huron was



the lead or key case in 1941.  See:



Stream Control Commission vs. Port Huron	305 Mich. 153..



Stream Control Commission vs. Port Huron	323 Mich. 541.



Mayor of Port Huron vs. City Treasurer	328 Mich. 99.



         Other local enabling Acts in addition to Home Rule



authorizations assisting municipalities to finance needed



facilities on a separate or group basis are the following:



1.  Revenue Bond Law	Act 94, P.A. 1933, as amended,



2.  County Water & Sewer Law—Act 342, P. A. 1939, as amended.



3.  County Public Works	Act 185, P. A. 1957* as amended.



         Within the past six years the presence or prospect



of Federal construction grant assistance has offset some



municipal reluctance to act constructively.



         Industrial managements, as  a group, have been far



more responsive than municipalities  to Commission requests



and  .Orders for pollution control measures.



         Industries have been equally active over the past



15 year period in bringing, their discharges under approved



control.  With very few exceptions,  sanitary sewage  is now



collected and treated  in municipal  systems or  by approved



methods at industry owned and operated facilities.  Facil-



ities and methods for  treatment or  control of  the polluting



constituents  in the process  wastes  are provided  at virtually

-------
                                                      329



all industries.  The degree of control or treatment varies



from that resulting from reducing raw material and product



losses to the sewer through recovery and re-use methods



to primary and secondary treatment by chemical and biolog-



ical methods employing conventional sewage treatment prin-



ciples.  At those industries where waste control is rated



adequate by the Commission staff, treatment or control is



provided to a degree necessary to prevent conditions of un-



lawful pollution as defined in the Water Resources Commission



Act.




Enforcement Actions



         The high percentage of total communities and in-



dustries where formal corrective actions have been taken



by the Water Resources Commission and Health Commissioner is



indicative of the agressive program of these agencies to



control pollution throughout the area.  The nature of these



actions, when taken, and the status of compliance therewith



is shown in Tables XV, XVI, XVII and XVIII.



         Two terms used in these Tables require clarifi-



cation.  "Stipulation" as used here refers to a fdrraal action



taken by the governing body of a municipality or industrial



management expressing intent to comply with pollution control



requirements  of the Water Resources Commission.  It usually



incorporates  a time schedule for abatement and the degree




of control to be provided.   The adoption of the  Stipulation

-------
                                                      330
and its acceptance by the Water Resources Commission is in
lieu of the issuance of an Order by the Commission contain-
ing essentially the same requirements as set forth in the
Stipulation.  The term "Agreement" refers to an enforceable
Agreement entered into between the State Health Commissioner
and the governing body of a municipality by which the muni-
cipality binds itself to construct specified sewerage works
including treatment pursuant to a required time schedule.
This Agreement, and the assurances it provides for control
of pollution, qualifies the municipality for permits from
the Health Commissioner for certain requested sewer con-
struction.
         The effectiveness of these procedures may be eval-
uated in terms of the extent of compliance by construction
of the required facilities.  As shown in Table XV, all ex-
cept three of the communities either have complied with the
requirements or have  scheduled the construction to commence
in 1962.   It is expected  that all  of these projects will be
completed  by late 1963 and many of them sooner.   The  in-
dustries where further needs are to be  met  are shown  in
Table XVII.
          (Tables XV,  XVI, XVII and XVIII  are as follows:)

-------
      FORMAL CORRECTIVE ACTIONS AGAINST MUNICIPALITIES


                             by


MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION


              TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF POLLUTION
Order, Stipulation or
Agreement
Issuing
Communi ty
Ad r i a n
A) len Park
Bel lev! 1 le
Berkley
Beverly Hi 1 Is
Bi rmi ngham
Bi rmi ngham
Blissfield
BI cornfield Hills
Bloom fie Id Twp.
Center Line
Chelsea
Claws on
Dearborn
Dearborn Twp.
Detroit
Detroi t
Detroit
Dundee
Ecorse
Action
Order
Agreement
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Agreement
Order
Stip'n.
Order
Order
Order
Agreement
Order
Agreement
Agency
W.
M.
W.
M.
M.
W.
M.
W.
W.
W.
W.
M.
M.
W.
M.
W.
W.
M.
W.
M.
R.
D.
R.
D.
D.
R.
D.
R.
R.
R.
R.
D.
D.
R.
D.
R.
R.
D.
R.
D.
C.
H.
C.
H.
H.
C.
H.
C.
C.
C.
C.
H.
H.
C.
H.
C.
C.
H.
C.
H.
Year
1936
1958
1956
1957
1957
1952
1957
1951
1952
1952
1958
1959
1957
1956
1961
1950
1950
1959
1951
1958
Faci
1
Requ
Add!
Add!
Addi
Add!
Addi
New
Addi
New
New
New
New
Addi
Addi
New
Addi
New
New
Addi
New
Addi
t
t
t
t
t

t




t
t

t


t

t
i t ies
i red
ions
ions
i ons
ions
ions

ions




ions
i ons

ions


i ons

ions
Year Action
Af f i rmed
by
Court Decree
19^9
	
1957
	
	
1955
	
	
1955
1955
I960
	
	
	
	
	
	
	
1956
	
Status
of

Comp] i a nee
March 27,
Compl ied
Scheduled
Scheduled
Scheduled
Scheduled
Compl ied
Scheduled
Compl ied
Comp] ied
Compl ied
Commenced
Compl ied
Scheduled
Scheduled
Commenced
Compl ied
Under cons
Commenced
Compl ied
Scheduled
1962

1962
1962
1962
1962

1962





1962
1962
1961

truct ion
1961

1962
                                                                                       00
                                                                                       I—
                                                                                       m

                                                                                       x

-------
                           ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS AGAINST MUNICIPALITIES  (continued)
Commun i ty

Farm!ngton
Ferndale
Ferndale
Flat Rock
Garden City

Gi braltar
Grosse Ile Twp.
Grosse Pte. Park
Grosse Pte. Woods
Harper Woods

Hazel Park
Hazel Park
Hunti ngton Woods
Lathrup ViIlage
Lincoln Park

Li voni a
Li voni a
Madison Heights
Manchester
Me ! vi nda le

Mi Ian
MiIford
Nanki n Towns hi p
Northvi1le
Oak  Park

Pleasant Ridge
Plymouth
Plymouth Twp.
Pontiac
Pont i ac
Order, Stipulation
Agreement

Action
Order
Order
Order
Agreement
Order
Agreement
Peti t ion
Stip'n.
Agreement
Agreement
Order
Order
Order
Order
Agreement
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
1 ssuing
Agency
W.R.C.
W.R.C.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
W.R.C.
W.R.C.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
W.R.C.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
W.R.C.
M.D.H.
W.R.C.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
W.R.C.
W.R.C.
W.R.C.
W.R.C.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
W.R.C.
W.R.C.
or

Year
1950
1951
1957
1958
1961
1958
1957
I960
1958
1958
1958
1957
1957
195^
1958
1950
1961
1957
1951
1951
1951
1951
1961
1961
1957
1957
1961
1961
1951
1959
FaciIi ties
 Requi red

New
Add!tions*
Add!tions
Addi t ions
Add i t ions

Add i t i ons
New
Addi tions
Addi t ions
Add i t i ons

Add i t ions
Addi tions
Addi ti ons
New
Add i t i ons

New
Addi tions
Addi tions
New
New

New
Addi tions
Add i tions
Add i t ions
Add i t i ons

Addi tions
Addi ti ons
Addi tions
Add i t ions
New
Year Action
  Af fi rmed
     by
Court Decree

    1953
    Status
      of
  Comp1iance
March 27,  1962
    1962


    1956
    1952
ComplIed
Compli ed
Scheduled
Scheduled
Commenced
                          1962
                          1962
                          1961
Scheduled  1962
Scheduled
Under construction
Commenced  196!
Commenced  1961

Scheduled
Scheduled  1962
Scheduled  1962
Scheduled  1962
Scheduled  1962
    I960
Complied
Commenced
Scheduled
Complied
Complied

Complied
Complied
Commenced
Commenced
Scheduled

Scheduled
Commenced
Commenced
Complied
Commenced
                          1961
                          1962
                          1961
                          1961
                          1962

                          1962
                          196]
                          1961

-------
                         ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS AGAINST MUNICIPALITIES (continued)



Communi ty
Red ford Township
River Rouge
Ri verview
Rochester
Rockwood
Romeo
Romulus Township
Royal Oak
Royal Oak Twp.
Sal ine
South Lyon
S.Macomb San. .Dist.
S.E. Oakland Co.
Sew. Dis. System
Southf ield
Taylor Township
Tecumseh
Trenton
Troy
Washtenaw County
Wayne
Wyandotte
Yps i lanti
Order


Action
Order
Agreement
Agreement
Agreement
Agreement
Agreement
Agreement
Order
Order
Order
Agreement
Stip'n.

Order
Order
Agreement
Order
Agreement
Order
Peti tion
Order
Agreement
Agreement
, Stipulation
Agreement
I ssuing
Agency
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
W.R.C.
M.D.H.
W.R.C.

W.R.C.
W.R.C.
M.D.H.
W.R.C.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
W.R.C.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
M.D.H.
or


Year
1961
1958
I960
I960
1958
1959
1958
1957
1957
1951
1958
I960

1951
1952
1958
19^9
1958
1957
1957
1961
1958
1961


Faci li ties
Required
Add! tions
Additions
Add i tions
Add! tions
Add! tions
Add! tions
Add! tions
Add! tions
Additions
New
Add! tions
Add! tions

Add! t ions*
New
Add! tions
New
Add! tions
Add! tions
New
Add! tions
Add! tions
Add! tions
                                                               Year Action
                                                                 Affirmed
                                                                    by
                                                               Court Decree
                                                                   1961
                                                                   1962
                                                                   1956
     Status
       of
   Compliance
March  27,  1962
Commenced
Scheduled
Scheduled
ComplKid
Scheduled

Scheduled
Scheduled
Scheduled
Scheduled
Complied
1961
1962
1962

1962

1962
1962
1962
1962
Complied
Financing Stage

Complied
Comp1i ed
Scheduled 1962
                                                                              Complied
                                                                              Scheduled
                                                                              Scheduled
                                                                              Inacti ve
                                                                              Commenced

                                                                              Scheduled
                                                                              Commenced
          1962
          1962

          1961

          1962
          1962
Applies to content of phenols discharged to Red Run

-------
                             RECAPITULATION

ORDERS, STIPULATIONS OR AGREEMENTS TO CONTROL MUNICIPAL SEWAGE POLLUTION

                               issued by

      MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION
Orders, Stipulations
   or Agreements
Total  No. Communities
     Court Decrees
Affirming State Actions
Total  No. Communities
Complied
      Status of Compliance
     by No.  of Communities
   Under        Construction
Construction   Scheduled - 1962
                                                                                             >
                                                                                             CD
Detroi t River
C 1 i nton
Huron
Rai sin
Rouge
Lake Erie
17
20
9
7
19
0
15
17
9
7
18
0
1
5
1
3
5
0
1
5
1
3
5
0
1
5
3
7
6
0
5
2
1
0
9
0
9
12
k
0
k
0

-------
         Company

Anderson Chemical Company

Argus Camera

Belleville Plating Company

Briggs Mfg. Company

Buckeye Products Corp.

Chyrsler Corp.
   Defense Operations Div.
   Michigan Missile Div.

Consolidated Paper, Co.

Cross Company

Dana Corporation

Detroit Edison Company

Dundee Cement Company

E. I. duPont de Nemours
   and Co.
                                        ORDERS AND STIPULATIONS

                                               Entered By

                                       WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION

                                                  for

                                        INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTROL
                                                                 Year Action
Status  of
Action
Order
Order
Order
Order
Final Order
Order
Order
Stipulation
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Year
Entered
I960
1955
1958
1956
195^
1958
1952
1955
1956
1950
1956
1958
1957
Faci I i ties
Requi red
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
Add! tions
New
Add! tions
New
New
New
Affirmed by Compliance
Court Decree March 27, 1962
Additions requi
Compl ied
Compl ied

red


Not demonstrated
1957 Complied
Additions requi
Compl ied
Compl ied
Compl ied
Compl ied
Compl ied
Compl ied
Compl ied

red






                        01
                        x
                        <

-------
                                  ORDERS AND STIPULATIONS (continued)
         Company

Ford Motor Company
   Rouge Plant
   Li ncoln Di v.
   Chassis Parts Plant
   Eng.  Proving Ground
   Monroe Plant

Great Lakes Steel Corp.
   Blast Furnace Div.
   Ecorse Rol1i ng Mills
   Hot Strip Mi 11

General  Motors Corp.
   Fisher Body Div.

Hoover Ball &  Bearing Co.
   Ann Arbor Plant
   Universal Dye Casting Div.
   Universal Dye Casting Div.

Hurd Lock & Mfg. Company

King Seeley Corp.

McLouth Steel  Corp
   Gibraltar Plant
   Trenton Plant

Mills Products,  Inc.

Mobi1 Oil Company

National Machine Products
  Co.
Action
                       Year Action
  Year    Facilities   Affirmed by
Entered    Required    Court Decree
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
Final Order
Order
Final Order
Order
Order
Order
St i pul at i on
Order
Order
1952
1956
1955
1956
1956
1951
1951
1959
1959
1957
1953
1959
1953
1955
1956
I960
1958
I960
1956
Add i t ions
New
New
New
Add! tions
Add i t ions
Add! tions
New
New
New
New
Add i t i ons
New
Add i t i ons
New
Add! tions
Add i t i ons
Add! tions
New
  Status  of
  Compli ance
March 27, 1962
                                                 Complied
                                                 Complied
                                                 Complied
                                                 Complied
                                                 Complied
                                                 Complied
                                                 Complied
                                                 Complied
                                                 Complied


                                                 Complied
                                                 Complied
                                                 Complied

                                                 Complied

                                                 Complied


                                                 Complied
                                                 Not demonstrated

                                                 Compli ed

                                                 Complied

                                                 Compli ed

-------
                                  ORDERS AND STIPULATIONS (continued)
Company
Power Reactor Development
Co.
Reynolds Chemical Prod. Co.
Robin Prod. Co.
Shawinigan Resins Corp.
Simplex Paper Company
Spartan Products Inc.
Ternes Steel Company
Action
Order
Order
Order
Order
Final Order
Order
Order
Year
Entered
1961
1958
1961
1956
19^9
1959
1959
Faci 1 i
Requi
New
New
New
New
New
New
New
                                                                 Year Action
                                                                 Affi rmed by
                                                                 Court Decree
Thompson Ramo
   Wooldridge, Inc.
   Thompson Prod., Mich. Div.  Order
Wolverine Fabricating &
  Mfg. Company
             1955
Order
New
New
                                                   Status  of
                                                   Compliance
                                                 March 27,  1962
Complled

Comp1i ed

Complied

Complied

Complied

Complied

Complied



Not demonstrated


Comp1i ed

-------
                                                RECAPITULATION

                                            ORDERS AND STIPULATIONS

                                                  entered by

                                          WATER RESOURCES COMMISSION

                                                     for

                                           INDUSTRIAL WASTE CONTROL
     R i ve r
     Bas in

Lake St. Clair-
  Detroit River

Cl inton River

Huron River

Raisin River

Rouge River

Lake Erie
                                   Court Decrees
            Action               Affirming W.R.C.
Final Order  Order  Stipulation       Action
               6

               6
          Status of Compliance            m
          by No. of Companies             *
Complied  Not Demonstrated  Addns.  Req'd.  ~
   8

   8

   6

  10

   2

   2
                                                                     1

                                                                     2

-------
                                                      331



         MR. OEMING :  I think: that concludes the  presen-




tation of these two state agencies, Mr. Chairman, and  I




appreciate the opportunity to make this presentation.




         THE CHAIRMAN:  Thank you, Mr. Oemlng.  That  is a




very excellent and comprehensive report.  May we  ask  for




questions if we have some.  Are there any questions here?




         MR. POSTON:  I have a question.  I noticed that




Mr. Oeming has a procedure for comparing the degree of con-




trol in the industrial waste outlets, or industrial plants.




         MR. OEMING:  Yes, sir.



         MR. POSTON:  Whereby he gives them a grade.   I



wondered if this same were true for the municipal sewage




treatment works, and what is being done relative  to the oper-



ation of the plants.  We know that the large and  expensive




facilities can be built and have complicated mechanisms and




devices there.  What is done to assure ourselves  that we



get good operation in these large and expensive plants we




have?



         MR. OEMING:  May I answer first on the industrial




side, and then I think I will refer the second part of the




question on municipal wastes to Mr. Pierce.



         As you have pointed out, Mr. Poston, the Commission




does maintain this grading procedure.  We grade all the way




through from A through G or P, I think it is, for varying




degrees of control.  How  do we get at this?  The State is

-------
                                                      332



 divided into districts  in which,  in  each  district there



 is assigned an engineer.   In the  Detroit  area there is as-



 signed an engineer and  two assistants.  They make routine



 contacts with industry.  Observe  the operation of the facil-



 ities where there is a  formal facility  and, in addition,



 which nas not been pointed out, but  which is a very impor-




 tant aspect of this control, we maintain  a boat patrol on



 the Detroit River.  This  boat patrol operates during normal




 good weather conditions when you  can get  out on a boat,



 at intervals of three days a week; and, when you cannot get




 out because of ice conditions, or other problems, we use



 helicopters or airplanes  to make  these  observations.  If



 we find that something  is not up  to  snuff, the rating for



 that industry for that  year will  be  dropped so that next



 year if they had had a  bad record and had  an oil loss, or




 a poor record of maintaining the  sewage or waste treatment



 operation, their rating will drop.




          Unless I have  missed the point there, that covers



 the industry part of this.  Mr. Pierce  can answer for the



 municipal.




          MR. PIERCE: For the municipal operations,   Act




 98. of  the Public Acts of  1913 gave to the  state health



 commissioner the responsibility and  direction to supervise



 all sewage treatment works;  to enter upon  the plants and



to  inspect  them and  to  determine  their  accuracy; to see to

-------
                                                        333
  It that at all times they are adequate, that they are con-
  structed In an adequate manner, and that they are operated
  properly.  This is accomplished specifically by two methods:
           Number one, the submission of regular operating
  reports by the plant staff for the State Health Commissioner,
  These are submitted monthly and reviewed by the members
  of the staff.  It is accomplished in another way by eval-
  uation on the Job, on the spot, by engineers of the De-
  partment who, on an average in recent years have visited
  and observed and consulted with, and evaluated the sewage
  treatment plants on an average of once each three months —
  and average of four times per year.  So that there is an
  almost constant avenue of communication open between the
  community and the Department, both through the written
  material and through the face to face observations and in-
  terviews.
           In addition to this, I should like to say here
.  that we are extremely proud of the extent to which we have
  been able, in Michigan, to develop an adequate, well
  trained and competent staff of operators at sewage treat-
  ment works.  We are one of two states of the fifty states
  who have a mandatory certification of operators as to
  competency, a requirement of the statute that is being en-
  forced very thoroughly.  We have 100 percent in compliance
  in Michigan with this requirement that every plant shall have

-------
                                                      334
a superintendent in charge, whose competency has been at-
tested to by examinations, and so on, provided by the State
Health Commissioner, so that we not only have the opportunity
to go In and evaluate these plants and evaluate the oper-
ating records, but also have a second line of defense which
Is extremely Important, that Is, a competent operator In
every plant.
         MR. BOSTON:  Would It be possible for the record
to have some statement or report that would show the degree
of competency that you find In the operation of plants sim-
ilar to what Mr, Oemlng had, or a rating, so that we know
that the plants were producing or were not producing suit-
able and complete results?
         MR. PIERCE:  Yes.  I should like to make this
statement, to emphasize what h® been stated earlier today
and what Is In the written report.  Except for those in-
stances where the sewage treatment works are now being ex-
panded or extended, or where they are scheduled for expansion
or extension as indicated in the report during the next
couple of years, and with the further exception of three or
four total installations in this entire southeastern area
of the state, the facilities themselves are adequate in re-
lation to the requisites of the Michigan statutes.  The
operation of these facilities, I would say, is as adequate
as you can expect operation to be, sir, on the basis of a

-------
                                                      335
well trained staff and recognizing that human weaknesses
and frailties, and the frailties of mechanical equipment
exist; but, looking at this  in a broad sense I should say
that the operation is at a very high level, and of a very
high order today.
         MR. POSTON:  Thank  you.
         MR. DEL A. SMITH (The Izaao Walton League of
America) :  Mr. Chairman, are you permitting any questions
from the audience at all?
         THE CHAIRMAN:  Not  just now, but you will be per-
mitted to make a statement as called on by the state and
you can cover your points then.
         Have you any further questions?
         MR. POSTON I  No.
         THE CHAIRMAN:  Dr.  Heustls.
         DR. HEUSTIS:  Those persons who have indicated to
Mr. Adams or myself that they would like to make a state-
ment, we have a list of such names.  I would suggest that
those in the room who are not sure their names are on this
list, get In touch with Mr.  Adams during the lunch hour to
be sure their names are on the list*
         Our procedure this  afternoon we anticipate will
be similar to the procedure  this morning.  If anyone has a
written statement they would like to leave, they may most
certainly leave it, and if they would rather be elsewhere

-------
                                                      336
this afternoon, their absence will in no way prejudice their
statement.  It will be properly entered in the record and
will be fully considered along with the other material.
         Some of the industrial managements contacted me
about that specific point.  As long as we have the statement
it will be entered in the record and will be considered.
         Again this afternoon we are going to do our best,
with your help, if we can to make the written statements
a part of the written record and to discourage as much as
we can, within your wishes, the making of oral statements
of any length.  We will not put the oral statements on the
record when we have a written statement unless specifically
requested to do so by you.
         We aim to come back at a quarter past one and try
to get this thing wrapped up.
         THE CHAIRMAN:  Then we will stand in recess for an
hour and a quarter to a quarter past one.
         (Whereupon at 12:00 o'clock noon the Conference
recessed until 1:13 p.m.)

-------
                                                      337
                  AFTERNOON SESSION
         THE CHAIRMAN:  May we reconvene?  Dr. Heustis.
         DR. HEUSTIS:  The Attorney General's office for
the State of Michigan will be represented by Mr. Nicholas
V. Olds.  We are very hopeful at this point.  Mr. Olds has
a prepared statement.  Mr. Olds' statement is offered and
printed for the record and will be a part of it, and unless
Mr. Olds specifically requests, his verbal statement will
not be for the written record.  We are very hopeful, Mr.
Olds.  We realize that you have been ill and that you will
not overdo yourself by spending too long a time at the pod-
ium.
         STATEMENT OF NICHOLAS V. OLDS, ASSISTANT
         ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF MICHIGAN
         MR. OLDS:  Coming from a Doctor —
         Mr. Chairman and ladies and gentlemen:
         The purpose of this paper is to supplement the
paper presented by Milton P. Adams, executive secretary
of the Michigan Water Resources Commission entitled
"Administrative Policies and Procedure and State Program —
Statutory Authority."  It will discuss:  (1) The Supreme
Court decisions interpreting the Water Resources Act and
its predecessor, the Stream Control Commission Act, as
well as the bonding statute, Act 320 P A 1927 as amended;
(2) The legal effect of and the impact which the Boundary

-------
                                                      338



Waters Treaty of 1909 has on the State's responsibility



with respect to controlling pollution of boundary watersc



         (l)  Legal History of_ Abatement of. Pollution of_



State Waters by Judicial Decisions,



         Prior to the adoption of the Stream Control Com-



mission Act in 1929* the Supreme Court of our State had



occasion to pass upon the common law authority of the State



of Michigan to abate a nuisance created by the pollution



of waters by a municipality.  In the case of Attorney



General ex rel Township of Wyoming v« City of Grand Rapids,



175 Mich. 503, decided in May 1913, the court held that the



attorney general acting under his broad common law powers



had the authority to file suits on behalf of the State of



Michigan to compel the City of Grand Rapids to abate the



public nuisance that it was making in the waters of the



Grand River by discharging raw sewage therein.  In its



decree the Supreme Court ordered that the city construct



such works as were necessary to abate the pollution within



one year.



         The march of events, including the outbreak of



World War I, delayed construction of these works until the



1920»s.





         In 1929 the legislature passed the Stream Control



Commission Act, namely, Act 245 PA 1929.  The constitutionality



and authority of this Commission to issue orders requiring

-------
                                                      339
the abatement of pollution of the waters of the State was
reviewed in City of Niles v. Stream Control Commission,
296 Mich. 650, decided March 11, 19*11.  In that case the
City of Nlles appealed from an order of the Stream Control
Commission directing the city to begin construction of a
sewage treatment plant for the purpose of preventing the
discharge of raw sewage into the St. Joseph River.  The
Supreme Court sustained the authority of the Commission,
validated its order and compelled the City of Niles to
comply.
         In the course of that decision the court made some
notable observations, among which is the following:
              "In order to stop pollution of the river,
         it was necessary for the commission to take
         action against the city of Niles, Inasmuch as
         it was the first city in the State on the
         course of the river below the  Indiana cities
         and thus open the way for suit to compel the
         Indiana cities to stop pollution of the waters
         of the river.  It is an instance where the
         State must clean up its own back yard before
         being in a position to ask or  seek to compel
         its neighbor to clean up.  This was not an
         arbitrary exercise of power  by the commission
         but a practical movement toward accomplishment

-------
                                                      340
         of a most desirable end."  (Quoted on
         P. 157, 305 Mich Rep.)
         However, the most notable series of cases Involved
the enforcement of the order which was issued by the Stream
Control Commission against the City of Port Huron.  On
February 11, 1936, the Commission issued an order against
the City of Port Huron requiring it "to proceed to the con-
struction of a sewage treatment plant and the necessary col-
lecting and Intercepting sewers, pumping stations, force
mains and other appurtenances in connection therewith, all
when and as approved by the Michigan Department of Health
to permit treatment for the sewage of the city before its
discharge to State waters."  The city failed to comply with
this order and the Commission filed a bill of complaint on
December 9, 1939 to enforce it.  After an extended trial
the Circuit Court denied the relief sought by the Commission
and the matter was appealed to the Supreme Court.  In the
course of its opinion (Stream Control Commission v. Port
Huron, 305 Mich. 153), reversing the decision of the lower
court and validating the order of the Commission, the court
referred to the argument made by the city that construction
of the sewage plant would not materially reduce pollution
in the river and that its present method of sewage disposal
did not create a public nuisance to the people residing
along the river as well as those in the cities of Marysvilie,

-------
                                                      341
St. Glair, Marine City and Algonac situated within 30
miles below Port Huron.  In disposing of this contention,
the court stated (p. 157):
         "The record contains sufficient testimony
         to substantiate the State's contention that
         the present raw sewage disposal method is a
         constant menace to the health and well-being
         of the down-river communities as well as to
         tourists.  This evidence clearly Justifies
         the Commission's order.  Under the authority
         of the City of Nlles case, supra, where sim-
         ilar arguments were advanced, it is no defense
         to a statutory charge of river-water pollution
         that others have or are contributing to that
         condition."
         A contention made by the city consisted of in-
voking the doctrines of "balancing of equities" and "com-
parative injury."  These doctrines are always invoiced when
a number of municipalities or industries contribute to the
pollution of a body of water, each one claiming that it
should not be required to abate its contribution to the pol-
lution until the others are required to do likewise.  In
disposing of this contention the Supreme Court said
(p. 157-158):
              "Even if we should concur with the

-------
                                                      342

         trial Judge In his conclusion that a

         'balancing of equities' favors the

         city, this is not a proper case for

         the application of that doctrine.  The

         doctrine of 'comparative injury1 should

         be confined to those situations where

         the plaintiff can be substantially com-

         pensated.  This principle is distin-

         guished in City of Harrlsonville v.

         W. S. Dickey Clay Manfg. Co., 289 U.S.

         334, 337 (53 Sup. Ct. 602, 77 L. Ed.

         1208)."
                        **«*
              "The doctrine of 'comparative injury'
         should not be invoiced to justify the con-
         tinuance of an act that tends to impair
         public health."


         Another contention made by the City of Port Huron

was its financial inability to comply with the order.  In

disposing of this issue against the city, the court  stated

(p. 159):

              "The act creating the commission was

         under the police power vested in the State,

         and the order in question was not arbitrary

         or unreasonable but became necessary by

         reason of the previous refusal of the

         city of Port Huron to stop pollution of the

-------
                                                      343
         St. Glair and Black rivers.  The evidence
         justified the order of the commission, and
         the decree entered below must be vacated.
              "We are not unmindful of the situation
         caused by war conditions and the fact that
         the city of Port Huron will have difficulty
         in complying with the commission's order due
         to necessary materials now required for
         war purposes.  This, however, does not,
         and should not, prevent the city from imme-
        diately taking those steps necessary to in-
         sure the carrying out of the mandate of the
         commission, but a reasonable time should be
         allowed for completion of the project.  We
         apprehend that the State and city can agree
         upon the time that Is necessary, and if they
         cannot, this Is a matter which can be deter-
         mined by the trial judge upon proper proofs."
         The City of Port Huron, however, failed to comply
with the order of the Supreme Court and consequently the
attorney general filed a motion for final process to enforce
the decree.  The court rendered its opinion in People ex rel
Stream Control Commission v. City of Port Huron, 323 Mich.
541.  In a per curlam opinion reviewing the events that had
occurred including reference to war conditions that had made

-------
                                                      344

it Impossible for the city to procure necessary materials
for construction and that time was required for this pur-

pose, and pointing out that the city had authorized the
issuance of bonds totalling $1,600,000 for construction of

the sewage disposal plant, the court stated:
         "This phase of the situation presents a
         matter for practical consideration.  The
         problem is ore that cannot be solved other

         than by the construction of proper facil-
         ities necessary for the treatment of the
         raw sewage .  . .  The condition existing
         is one, as indicated in the prior opinion

         of this court, that should be remedied as

         soon as possible.  If the course the city
         commission claims it is pursuing is followed

         with reasonable diligence, it seems clear

         that the desired result can be accomplished

         in the not far distant future.  ....
         It seems expedient now that a definite date

         should be  fixed prior tovhich the sewage

         disposal plant, the  intercepting sewers and
         other necessary appurtenances  shall be com-

         pleted so  that the existing  situation may

         be ended.
         "The injunotlve relief  sought  by the motion
                                                  GPO B208I9—B-12

-------
                                                      345
         of the attorney general will be granted
         effective as of October 1, 1950."
         Even this, however, did not end the controversy
because the City of Port Huron experienced difficulty in
selling the bonds to raise the money for construction of
the works.  Apparently the bonding houses wanted a decision
from the State Supreme Court validating these proposed bonds,,
Consequently, upon the city treasurer's refusal to counter-
sign the bonds, mandamus proceedings were filed by the mayor
of Port Huron agalnt him.  The attorney general intervened
as plaintiff and the matter was decided by the Supreme
Court in Port Huron Mayor v. Treasurer, 328 Mich. 99.  In
its opinion the court reviewed the prior proceedings, the
various resolutions and ordinances adopted by the city for
the issuance of the bonds, and the court pinpointed the
critical issue as follows (p. 106):
              "The most important question raised
         by the pleadings is whether the issuance
         of the general obligation bonds of $1,300,000
         must be approved by a 3/5 majority of the
         qualified electors of the city of Port
         Huron after due notice has been given to
         them in the same manner and to the extent
         that is required for issuance of other
         general obligation bonds issued under the

-------
                                                      346
         charter of the oity of Fort Huron and by
         the home-rule act."
         The bonds had not been submitted to the electors
for approval and thus the court was faced with the responsi-
bility of deciding whether its previous orders could be
complied with without reference to any referendum for the
issuance of the bonds to raise the money needed for compli-
ance with the orders of the Supreme Court«  Act 320 PA 1927
authorized the legislative bodies of municipalities to
issue and sell bonds necessary for the construction of
sewage disposal plants "whenever a court of, competent
Jurisdiction in this State shall have ordered the installation
of_ a sewage or garbage disposal system in any of, the govern-
mental agencies or munloipalities herein mentioned and the
plans therefore shall have been prepared and approved by_
the state commissioner of_ health. . . ."
        Aaothcr afciftttt known as the Municipal Finance Act,
namely Act 273 PA 1923, contained the same provision with
reference to the construction of "necessary storm and sani-
tary sewers."
         After reviewing the various authorities, the court
held that whenever a municipality finds It necessary to raise
money by the issuance of bonds for the purpose of complying
with a court order involving the public health of the State,
no referendum of approval by the people is necessary.  Its

-------
                                                      3^7
opinion on this point stated:
              "The action of the plaintiffs was in
         strict accord with our preemptory order for
         the installation of a sewage treatment sys-
         tem in Port Huron.  The proposed bond issue
         was not to raise money for ordinary municipal
         purposes or Improvements, but to carry out
         the order of this Court, and prevent defend-
         ant from further polluting public streams
         and endangering the health and comfort not
         only of its own inhabitants but also of all
         others in any way affected by the pollution
         of the waters by the filth from the Port
         Huron sewers.  This no longer created
         solely a problem of_ Port Huron but one
         of_ the State and this may have been the
         reason for enactment of_ Act No_.. £20, supra,
         sections of_ which we_ have quoted.  The
         order was for the protection  of the people
         of the State of_ Michigan.   It. transcended
         local purposes.
               "Claims of the defendant that notice
         and a vote of the electors  of Port Huron
         were necessary  are  fully  answered  by
         sections 7 and  8  of PA 1927,  No.  320,  supra.

-------
                                                      348



         The city of Port Huron was bound to carry



         out the order of this Court, which confirmed



         the previous order of the stream control



         commission.  There was neither necessity,



         occasion, nor any reason to publish the



         resolution authorizing the issuance of the



         bonds, nor, as previously stated, did it_



         require the vote of_ 3/5 of_ the electors."



         (Emphasis supplied.)



         Another point raised  was that the levying of the



tax for the payment of such bonds would exeed the tax limi-



tations provided by the city charter.  This is a contention



which is usually made by municipalities whenever they are



faced with complying with an order of the Water Resources



Commission.  In its opinion the court rejected this con-



tention by holding that there  is ample authority in Act 320



PA 1927 to levy taxes for the  purposes mentioned in that



statute; and that even though the tax limitations were ex-



ceeded, such defense was not valid when the city is re-



quired to comply with a court  order.



         The Supreme  Court thereupon issued its writ of



mandamus ordering the city treasurer to countersign the



bonds and In due time the sewage disposal system of the



City of Port Huron was built and has been operating ever



since.

-------
         This series of oases paved the way for the enforce-
ment of the orders of the Water Resources Commission,
successor to the Stream Control Commission, and also enabled
our municipalities to finance the construction of the works
needed to comply with said orders.  Consequently during
the past fifteen years numerous court orders have been
secured against municipalities in order to enable them to
take advantage of the Issuance of court ordered bonds.
Thus no municipality can plead that it is financially un-
able to comply with the orders of the Commission because
financial inability has never been a defense against the
abatement of a nuisance either by a private citizen or by
a municipal entity.

         (2)  Effect of the Boundary Waters Treaty of
1909 on. the Responsibility o£ the State and its Munici-
palities and Citizens t£ Control Pollution of_ Boundary
Waters.
         The State of Michigan has extensive boundary waters
in  common with our Canadian neighbor.  The Detroit River,
Lake St. Glair,  St.  Glair River and St. Marys  River are the
most important boundary waters that have been  the  subject
of  pollution control between  our two  countries.  The  last
sentence of Article  IV  of the Boundary Waters  Treaty  of 1909
existing between the United States and Canada provides:

-------
                                                      350
         "It Is further agreed that the waters herein
         defined as boundary waters and waters flowing
         across the boundary shall not be polluted
         on either side to the injury of health or
         property on the other."
         The first task undertaken by the International
Joint Commission shortly after it was organized under this
treaty was investigation of the pollution of boundary waters.
The Commission filed a report initiated in 1912 and com-
pleted in 1918.  This indicated that many sections of
boundary waters were seriously polluted and were endanger-
ing the health and welfare of people and property on both
sides of the boundary.  To resolve this problem, the Com-
mission recommended that the two governments consider
granting it extra-territorial authority to abate and place
this pollution under control.  This suggestion was never
followed; and the onset of World War I put it into the
background.
         Nothing of consequence was done  in putting pol-
lution of boundary waters under control until 19^ when the
governments of the United States and Canada on April I,
1946 made a'reference to the International Joint Commission
as follows:
         "I have the honor to advise you that the
         governments of the United States and Canada

-------
                                             351
have been informed that the waters of
the St. Glair River, Lake St. Clair and
the Detroit River are being polluted by
sewage and industrial wastes emptied
into those waters.  Having in mind the
provisions of Article IV of the Boundary
Waters Treaty signed January 11, 1909,
that boundary waters and waters flowing
across the boundary shall not be polluted
on either side to the Injury of health or
property on the other side, the two
Governments have agreed upon a joint
Reference on the matter to the Inter-
national Joint Commission, pursuant to
the provisions of Article IX of said
Treaty.  The Commission is requested to
inquire into and report to the two
Governments upon the following questions:
(1)  Are the waters referred to in the
     preceding paragraph, or any of them
     actually being polluted on either
     side of the boundary to the injury
     of health or property on the other
     side of the boundary?
(2)  If the foregoing question is answered

-------
                                                      352
              In the affirmative, to what extent,
              by what causes, and in what localities
              is such pollution taking place?
         (3)  If the Commission should find that
              pollution of the character just re-
              ferred to is taking place, what
              measures for remedying the situation
              would, in its Judgment, be most
              practicable from theeconomic, sani-
              tary and other points of view?
         (4)  If the Commission should find that the
              construction or maintenance of remed-
              ial or preventive works is necessary
              to render the waters sanitary and
              suitable for domestic and other uses,
              it should indicate the nature, location
              and extent of such works, and the
              probable cost thereof, and by whom and
              in what proportion such cost should be
              borne."
         On October 2, 1946 the reference was extended to
include the waters of the St. Marys River from Lake Super-
ior to Lake Huron.  This reference had its genesis in the
complaint registered by the City of Detroit that its source
of water supply at the head of Belle Isle was being con-

-------
                                                       353
 taminated by phenolic wastes discharged into the St. Glair
 River at Sarnla, Canada, by various refining companies.
 But it will be observed that the reference was broad enough
 to include not only industrial wastes but  also domestic
 sewage wastes emanating from either side of the boundary.
          The International Joint Commission organized  various
 boards to make the  investigation of these  waters,  composed
 of representatives  of the State of Michigan, the U.S.  Public
 Health Service, the Canadian government, and the Province  of
 Ontario.   This board was known as the Technical Advisory
 Board  to  the Commission.
          In 1950 the International Joint Commission  completed
 its investigation and report which was transmitted to  the
 governments of the  United States and Canada.  These  govern-
 ments  indicated approval of the report in  1951. This  report
 was very  comprehensive and it contains recommendations with
irespect to "objectives for boundary waters quality control."
 For detail as to what these objectives are, specific reference
 should be made to this report, but in   general they include
 the following:
          "General Objectives
               All wastes, including sanitary sewage,
          storm water and industrial effluents, shall
          be in such condition when discharged into any
          stream that they will not create conditions

-------
                                             354
In the boundary waters which will adversely
affect the use of those waters for the
following purposes:  source of domestic
water supply or industrial water supply,
navigation, fish and wildlife, bathing,
recreation, agriculture and other riparian
activities.
     In general, adverse conditions are caused
by:
(a)  Excessive bacterial, physical or chem-
     ical contamination.
(b)  Unnatural deposits in the stream, inter-
     fering with navigation, fish and wild-
     life, bathing, recreation, or destruction
     of aesthetic values.
(o)  Toxic substances and materials im-
     parting objectionable tastes and odors
     to waters used for domestic or Industrial
     purposes.
(d)  Floating materials, Including oils,
     grease, garbage, sewage solids, or
     other refuse.
"Specific Objectives
     In more specific terms, adequate controls
of pollution will necessitate the following

-------
                                             355
objectives for:
(a)  Sanitary Sewage, Storm Water and Wastes
     from Water Craft
     Sufficient treatment for adequate re-
     moval or reduction of solids, bacteria
     and chemical constituents which may inter-
     fere unreasonably with the use of these
     waters for purposes aforementioned.
     Adequate protection for these waters,
     except in certain specific instances
     influenced by local conditions, should
     be provided if the ooliform M.P.N.
     median value does not exceed 2,400 per
     10O ml. at any point in the waters fol-
     lowing initial dilution.
(b)  Industrial Wastes
     (1)  Chemical Wastes — -Phenolic Type
     Industrial waste effluents from phenolic
     hydro-carbon and other chemical plants
     will cause objectionable tastes or odors
     in drinking or industrial water supplies
     and may taint the flesh of fish.
     Adequate protection should be provided
     for these waters if the concentration
     of phenol or phenol equivalents does

-------
                                                      356
              not exceed an average of 2 p.p.b. and
              a maximum of 5 p.p.b. at any point In
              these waters following Initial dilution.
              This quality In the receiving waters will
              probably be attained if plant effluents
              are limited to 20 p.p.b. of phenol or
              phenol equivalents.
              Some of the Industries producing phenolic
              wastes are:  coke, synthetic resin, oil
              refining, petroleum cracking, tar, road
              oil, oreosotlng, wood distillation, and
              dye manufacturing plants."
                         ************
         In effect, what the two governments did by
accepting this report is that they obligated themselves as
well as their municipal entitles and private citizens and
enterprises to achieve the water qualities indicated in
the objectives by taking such measures as would be nec-
 essary for that purpose.  The report Indicated that there
was ample legal authority resting in the various levels of
government In both countries to control pollutional dis-
charges so that these objectives could be attained.
         The Detroit River from the head of Belle Isle
down to Lake Erie is the stretch of water constituting
the subject matter of this conference.  If the treaty Is

-------
                                                       357



 to be observed by both nations, then It means that an ob-



 ligation rests upon the State of Michigan not to pollute



 the waters of the Detroit River to such an extent that it



 would cause injury to Canadian interests across the bound-



 ary*  However, one of the findings of the Technical Advi-



sory Board was that any pollutional substance discharged on



 one side of the bounday invariably has trans-boundary ef-



 fects.  Under the Constitution of the United States, treatie?



 are made the supreme law of the land, as is specified in



 Sec. (2) Article VI:



          "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United



          States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof;



          and all Treaties made,or which shall be made,



          under the Authority of the United States, shall



          be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges



          in every State shall be bound thereby, any



          Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State



          to the Contrary notwithstanding."



          Consequently, the requirements of this treaty as



 well as any treaty entered into by the United States govern-



 ment are binding not only on the government of the United



 States of America but on the State of Michigan and all of



 Its municipal entities and citizens.



          We have appeared on numerous occasions before the



 International Joint Commission over the past ten years com-

-------
                                                      358
plaining about the fact that the municipalities of Ontario
such as Sault Ste, Marie, Sarnia, Windsor, etc. were not
complying with the treaty as implemented by the Commission's
1951 report.
         It behooves us at this time to consider seriously
whether the conditions in the Detroit River fail to comply
with the obligations of the treaty; and if so, what we as
a State and as a group of municipalities of that State
should do to secure compliance.  We all know that at the
present time Wayne County is constructing a new water sys-
tem in the Detroit River and that its water intake is lo-
cated across the boundary in Canadian waters.  This means that
best efforts should be made on our side of the boundary to
protect this water system from degrading the water which
It shall receive; and of course there will be an equal
responsibility on the part of Canada to do likewise.
         Even though the legal machinery which I have de-
scribed seems to be adequate to put Michigan in the fore-
front of all the States in its water pollution control pro-
gram, this does not mean that the coercive powers of the
State need be used on every occasion.  There is a great
area of cooperative action that can be taken by a munici-
pality or by an  industry or by a group of municipalities
and industries.  An example of the fruits that can come
from cooperative action is the recent agreements that have

-------
                                                      359
been signed by various municipalities with the Wayne
County Public Works Department for the construction of
interceptors and other facilities that have been needed
for a long time to prevent pollution of the waters of the
Rouge River and other waters including the Detroit River.
What I am trying to say is that municipalities and Industrie*
should recognize their responsibilities toward the health
of their own citizens and others and meet these responsi-
bilities as much as possible without resort to the enforce-
ment powers of the  Water Resources Commission or of the
State Health Department.
         Water pollution control is a never-ending battle ancj
as our population continues to grow, resulting in an in-
crease in industrial and commercial development, the waters
of our State will be subjected to greater demands for waste
assimilation purposes.  However, it will do none of us any
good if we "foul our own nests" so that we will be deprived
of the maximum use of the waters that flow by our door step.
The legal machinery provided by the State of Michigan is
adequate to place under proper control any species of waste
discharges whether domestic or industrial.  The definition
of unlawful pollution contained in Sec. 6 of the Water Re-
sources Act is one of the best in the country.
         (Sec. 6 of Water Resources Act:  It shall be un-
lawful for any person to discharge or permit to be dischargecj

-------
                                                      360
into any of the lakes, rivers, streams or other waters of

this state any substance which is injurious to the public

health or to the conducting of any industrial enterprise
or other lawful occupation; or whereby any fish or migra-
tory bird life or any wild animal or aquatic life may be

destroyed or the growth or propagation thereof be prevented
or injuriously affected or the value of lawfully taken fish

or game be destroyed or impaired as the consequence of said

pollution.  Any person who shall discharge or permit to

be discharged any waste or pollution into any of the waters

of this state, in contravention of the above provision of

this section, shall be deemed to violate the provisions of
this Act.  (Am. 1949 Act 117))

         In every instance where we have had to appeal to
the Supreme Court of our State for the enforcement of pol-

lution control orders, our action has been upheld.  The
legal tools are here to be used and all that is needed is

the faith and courage to use them.

         I thank you, Mr. Chairman.
         THE CHAIRMAN:  Thank you, Mr. Olds.  Are there

any comments or questions?  I would like to point out two

things, Mr. Olds.  As we said at the beginning, that was
on yesterday, what we are doing here is confining ourselves

to American waters and American pollution, because that

is all we have jurisdiction over here.   Regardless of the
                                                     GPO 820819—B-1 3

-------
                                                     361



very interesting question of whether a treaty or law of



the land governs, I think this is made moot in this situ-



ation because Section 12 of the Federal Water Pollution



Control Act states, "that this Act shall not be construed



as affecting or impairing the provisions of any treaty of



the United States."



         I think that is pretty clear right in our Act.



         MR. OLDS:  That is right.  In fact, neither any



Federal act nor any State act could abrogate a treaty.  It



is over everything.



         THE CHAIRMAN:  Yes.



         DR. HEUSTIS:  Mr. Chairman, may I call the next



witness?



         THE CHAIRMAN:  Yes.



         DR. HEUSTIS:  Mr. Arthur Elmer, the first of two



persons representing the Department of Conservation. Mr.



Elmer, do you have a statement?



         STATEMENT OF ARTHUR C. ELMER, CHIEF,



         DIVISION OF PARKS AND RECREATION,



         DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION, STATE OF



         MICHIGAN



         MR. ELMER:  Mr. Chairman, I do.



         DR. HEUSTIS:  Will you present one copy to the



reporter, please.  Again, Mr. Elmer, this statement will



be entered in the record.  It would be very much appreciated-

-------
                                                      362




 by us  if you would not read it but you are at liberty to



 make whatever presentation you think is appropriate.  Your



 remarks will not be on the written record unless you so



 request.



         MR. ELMER:  It is so short that unless I read it



 you won't even recognize I have been up here.



         Mr. Chairman, conferees, and ladies and gentlemen.



 My name is Arthur C. Elmer, Chief, Division of Parks and



 Recreation, which is one of the seven divisions of the



 Conservation Department.  Gerald Eddy is my boss.  As such,



 the Sterling State Park is one of my problem children and



 it is  one of the problems we have come up here to discuss.



         Sterling State Park, described on our literature



 as:  624 acres at the north limits of the City of Monroe,



 about  7,800 feet of frontage on Lake Erie, with a safe



 shallow bathing beach, but largely undeveloped.  Actually,



 it is  much more than that, it is the only public beach on



 Lake Erie in the State of Michigan, located strategically



 between Detroit and Toledo, adjacent to excellent highways



 and roads.  It attracts in excess of one-half million per-



 sons annually to its shaded picnic areas and excellent sand



 beach.



         Initially it cost $285,000 and except for a long



 barrier sand beach, was largely marsh and open water.  Hy-



draulic dredging has now provided some 500 acres of useable

-------
                                                      363
land and two lagoons totaling some 100 acres, in addition
to greatly improving the beach area.  This dredging oper-
ation, which covered a period of several years, was under-
taken at a oost of more than $1,000,000.
         It is on this land and water thus created that we
expect to build an outdoor recreation area capable of serv-
ing some one and one-half million people annually.  Funds
now available would permit initial development for an over-
all program which will probably cost $5,000,000.
         Wayne County and the four counties surrounding it
have a population In excess of 4,000,000 persons, about 50
per cent of the total population of the state.  With swim-
ming waters at a premium and very few outdoor water recre-
ation spots within a reasonable distance from this mass of
people, it is most important that the waters of Lake Erie
be maintained in the best possible condition for public use
and the planned developments for this park are designed
with this in mind.
         The master plan, as approved by the Conservation
Commission, provides for parking spaces for more than 6,500
cars, 26,000 people at any time, 260,000 people in any one
day.  It provides for a picnic area of 89 acres, beaches
of 24 acres and game and lawn areas of 127 acres.  One-
fourth of the total area is water lagoons, designed to
provide fishing and boating In the waters and picnic sites

-------
                                                      364
along much of their shorelines.   The plan provides for
a major access road from 1-75,  the limited access highway
from Detroit to Toledo.   All of  these plans will have to
be greatly modified if suitable  pollution-free conditions
in the water of Lake Erie,  which lie adjacent to the park,
cannot be maintained.
         This has already been  demonstrated by the falling
off of attendance after August  15, 1961, when the Michigan
Department of Health directed that the beaches be posted
and the water declared unsafe for swimming.  Attendance fig-
ures since 1950 show a yearly increase, and this increase
continued even though, in 1961,  the Legislature passed a
law requiring that each car entering a State park would
require a yearly permit costing $2, or a daily permit costing
50 cents.
                     Sterling Attendance
                  1952           101,103
                  1953           400,537
                  1954           790,112
                  1955           852,613
                  1956           692,450
                  1957           662,484
                  1958           782,923
                  1959         1,239,216
                   I960           911,246
                   1961           651,726

-------
                                                      365
         In I960, the August attendance was 218,034.  In
1961 it slipped to 91,544.  More dramatic is the loss in
attendance after the order was issued in the middle of
August, 1961.  Prom August 14 to 31 in I960, the attendance
was 131,875, and from August 13 to 31 in 1961, the attendance
was 14,376.  Not all this loss can be attributed to the
posting  of the beach against swimming, but surely the
major part of the loss can and must be based on it.
         Failure to keep the waters of Lake Erie, adjacent
to the Sterling State Park, in a safe condition for swimming,
     r
boating, and other water uses, will necessitate a major
revision in the planned development of the park and an
added cost for development, probably in excess of $1,000,000.
         Preliminary studies for swimming pools at Sterling-
Monroe State Park indicate the need for three large pools
to accommodate the planned population of this popular
beach area.  Due to the large size of the pools and the
unstable soil conditions in the area, the cost of the pools
is estimated at $340,000 each, or $1,020,000 for the three
pools.  This estimate does not include the increased cost of
the bathhouses, although the special design of this facility
will undoubtedly cause an increase in cost over the original
beach-type bathhouse.
         Besides the prohibitive increase in cost of. devel-
opment of the area due to the major revisions in the planned

-------
                                                      366
development, we are also faced  with the elimination of
certain other water aotivitles.  Boating,  skin diving,
water skiing, and other water activities would have to
be eliminated.  The actual total loss in recreation values
is impossible to ascertain, but even the tangible losses
will have an increasing effect  on the people of this region.
         The master plan will be revised.   Neither Michigan
nor the nation can afford the loss of these great lake
waters for recreation and I am  extremely hopeful that as
a result of this hearing with this tremendous amount of
data, that we can shortly find  ways and means to remove
the "unsafe for swimming" signs from the Sterling State
Park beaches.
         The master plan attached to this  report shows the
original plan of development.
         (The plan of Sterling  State Park, Monroe, Michigan,
Department of Conservation, is  as follows:)

-------
•v;.-- • in
      1


                                                                    STERLING   STATE   PARK
                                                                      MONROE,  MICHIGAN
                                                                      DEPARTMENT  OF  CONSERVATION

-------
                                                     367
         Thank you, Mr.  Chairman.
         THE CHAIRMAN:   Thank you, are there any comments
or questions?  Do you think that swimming pools will be
as attractive as beach swimming to the patrons?
         MR. ELMER:   I am  sure they would not be,
         THE CHAIRMAN:   Thank you.  Dr. Heustls.
         DR. HEUSTIS: Mr. Herb Miller of the Department
of Conservation.  Do  you have a statement prepared?
         STATEMENT OP H. J. MILLER, DEPARTMENT OP
         CONSERVATION, STATE OP MICHIGAN
         MR. MILLER:  Yes.
         DR. HEUSTIS: Will you give the same to the court
reporter.
         Mr. Miller's statement is entered  into the record
and we certainly would appreciate your brevity.
         Do you want  these pictures put into  the  record?
         MR. MILLER:  No,  it is not necessary.
         THE CHAIRMAN:   If you want these pictures to be
made part of the record  we will reproduce them and make
them part of the transcript.
         MR. MILLER:   It is perfectly okay.
         DR. HEUSTIS: The pictures then will be entered  intp
and made a part of the record.
         (The photographs referred  to are as follows:)

-------
Waterfowl killed by oil pollution on
the lower Detroit River, March,  '60

-------
                  PQINTE MOUILLEE
               STATE GAME AREA
                    HEioouwrais
                DEPARTMENT »£M5£RVATION
Ducks killed by phosphorus
poisoning Feb.  1948.  Monsanto
Chemical Company outlet  - Trenton
Channel, Detroit

-------
Heavy ta.r-like  oil  on duck picked
up on Detroit River,  Feb.,  1948.

-------
Oil-soaked canvasback compared to
natural coloration.
Detroit River oil flow, March 10, 1960

-------
Close-up of oil pollution on lower
Detroit River, March 1960.

-------
Oil-soaked carcasses picked up on
Detroit River,  Feb. 1948.  Presented
as evidence at the Michigan United
Conservation Club meeting in Detroit.
Note,  the carcasses of whistling swan

-------
                                                      368



         MR. MILLER:   I represent the Michigan Department



of Conservation.  My  statement  will be  limited to wildlife



matters.  As a result of  pollution, heavy  losses of wild



waterfowl have occurred on  the  Detroit  River and Lake



Erie  in may of the  past twenty  years.   The following



account of pollution  in relation  to wildlife is presented



in response to a  request  for such a statement.



         For a better understanding of  the problems asso-



ciated with wildlife  it may be  helpful  to  review briefly the



conditions of the Detroit River area  in the early days  of



the white man.



         Recorded observations  since  the beginning of white



man's use of this area provide  glowing  accounts of the  abund-



ance  of game and  fish that  were found here. Father Henne-



pin's description of  the  Straits  of Detroit in his first pas-



sage  in  1679 referred to  the abundance  of  game and the  pro-



ductivity of the  area. Antoine  de Lamothe  Cadillac, Commar-



dant during the  founding of  Detroit, wrote  a description to



his  superiors  on  October 8, 1701, of  the Detroit  River  which




 includes the  following:



          "The  fish  there  are fed  and  laved in  sparkling and



pellucid waters,  and  are  none the less  delicious  for  the



 bountiful  supply (of them).  There are  such large numbers



 of swans that  the rushes among which  they are  massed  might



 be taken for lilies.   The gabbling goose,  the  duck,  the teal

-------
                                                      369
and the bustard" (cranes and wading birds) "are so common
there that, in order to satisfy you of It, I will only make
use of the expression of one of the savages, of whom I asked
before I got there whether there was much game there; 'there
is so much' he told me, 'that it only moves aside (long
enough) te allow the boat to pass.1"  (Lajeunessee, Ernest
J. -I960.  The Windsor Border Region, (Collection of Docu-
ments) The Champlain Society for the Government of Ontario.
University of Toronto Press.)
         Throughout Michigan's history, hunting, fishing,
and boating have been important recreational activities.
The hunting and fishing clubs that flourished in this part
of the state during the past century are evidence of the
potential of the area to attract and support wildlife.
People traveled great distances to participate In sporting
events and to spend their leisure time here.
         The Detroit River and Lake Erie in the past have
been, and still are, frequented by great numbers of water-
fowl, particularly during the spring and fall migration.
In addition, many waterfowl and furbearers are produced here,
General Description
         The lower half of the 30-mile Detroit River is more
intensively used by waterfowl than the upper because the
channels divide and between the channels there are shoals
with  dense  stands of aquatic plants and an abundance of
                                                   GPO 820819—B-l 4

-------
                                                      370
animal foods.  Lying below much of Detroit's industrial
development, this downstream portion is also more vulnerable
to pollution.  The upper portion offers good habitat on the
west side of Belle Isle locally known as Scott's Middle-
ground s.
         Lake Erie is an extensive feeding and resting area,
frequented by great numbers of ducks and coots, and some
geese and swans.  The waterfowl habitat here may be class-
ified at 50,000 acres used extensively by waterfowl and
appro*imately 80,000 acres used to a lesser extent.  There
are also important bordering marshes along the 55-mile
shore line; these are used principally by dabbling duck
species.  The best of these marshes are:  Pointe Mouillee
State Game Area, Monroe Marshes at the mouth of the Raisin
River, LaPlaisance Bay, and the Maumee Bay-Erie State Game
Area.
         In 1941, a general waterfowl survey was initiated
which showed that the Detroit River-Lake Erie area presented
special problems.  As a result, considerable time was spent
there.
         A number of special investigations have been carried
out in this area since then because serious losses of water-
fowl have occurred which were directly or indirectly asso-
ciated with pollution and thermal changes of these waters.
Losses have occurred at various times of the year but most

-------
                                                      371
frequently during periods of severe weather.
         Prior to the mid-1930's the wintering waterfowl
problem did not exist because the shallow, food-rioh lower
half of the river froze from bank to bank and the narrow,
deep, but ice-free upper half supported little food to
encourage the ducks to remain during the winter.  Then,
industrial plants, attracted by what appeared to be an un-
limited supply of water, developed rapidly along the lower
west bank of the river.
         A marked change occurred as industrial effluent
warmed the waters to the extent that parts of the lower
river were always ice-free.  Migrant waterfowl lingered,
and  for a number of years about 50,000 remained eaoh winter.
An unfortunate result  of the  industrial concentration has
been the  increasing pollution of  the river.   (Hunt, George
S. and Ewing,  Howard E.  -1953.   Industrial  Pollution and
Michigan  Waterfowl.  Trans.  N.  A. Wildlife  Conference
 18:366-368.)
          Early records of  the sport  of  horse-and-cutter
 races  on portions  of  the river that  now remain free  of  ice
 give evidence of the  change that has occurred.  As late as  the
 prohibition era records reveal "bootlegging"  across  the
 ice  of the Detroit  River.
 Waterfowl Use
          Great numbers of waterfowl continue to use  this

-------
                                                      372
 area  eventhough  It has beoome heavily Industrialized,
 serves as  one  of the great shipping arteries of world com-
 merce, has the greatest concentration of pleasure craft on
 the Great  Lakes, and has extensive residential developments.
         The birds contribute to the recreation of the people
 of this metropolitan area and certainly contribute in no
 small way  to their enjoyment.  The aesthetic values of these
migrant birds appearing In great numbers and in a variety of
 species are difficult to appraise, but they are nonetheless
real, and  a part of our heritage.
         The estimated waterfowl use of the Detroit River
and the western end of Lake Erie (Toledo Harbor to Bar
Point, Ontario) as determined by numerous aerial censuses
carried out since 194? is:
         Winter                     -  Average  48,000.  Pop-
                                      ulations ranged  from
                                      116,000  (mid-January
                                      1959) to as  low  as
                                      6,000 (mid-January
                                      1962).
         Spring                     -  Average 55,000.  Pop-
                                      ulations  ranged  from
                                      140,000  (early April
                                      1954) to  as low  as
                                     28,700 (April 12,
                                     1950).

-------
                                                     373



         Fall (pre-hunting season)   - Average  23,000. Pop-



                                      ulations ranged from



                                      38,300 (late  September



                                      1948)  to as low as



                                      14,000 (late  September




                                      1957).



         Pall (mid-hunting season)   - Average  123,000.   Pop-



                                      ulations ranged from



                                      325,100  (late October



                                      1954)  to as low as



                                      23,900 (late  October



                                      I960).



         Fall (post-hunting season) - Average  117,000.   Pop-



                                      ulations ranged from



                                      188,100  (early Decem-



                                      ber 1953) to  as low as



                                      15,200 (early Decem-




                                       ber 1955).



(Miller, U. J., et al.  Game Division, Michigan Department



of Conservation4  Report on file.)



         These estimates show only populations on a specific



day that a census was made and in no way reflect the total



number of migrants that may pass through here.  To  provide



a yearly use estimate approximately twenty-nine million



waterfowl-use days may be assigned to the Detroit River and

-------
                                                      374
Lake Erie.  (Fish and Wildlife Service Report - 1956.
Inventory of Permanent Water Habitat Significant to Water-
fowl in Michigan.)
National Importance
         The national and international importance of water-
fowl habitat in the Detroit River area is emphasized in
testimony recorded on the establishment of the Wyandotte Na-
tional Wildlife Refuge during hearings before the Subcommittee
on Fisheries and Wildlife Conservation of the Committee on
Merchant Marine and Fisheries, House of Representatives,
8?th Congress, first session on Law Enforcement Activities.
That testimony also includes numerous references to the pol-
lution problem that are pertinent for this present hearing.
A copy is being submitted for review to avoid repetition.
(Congressional Hearings - Misc. Fish and Wildlife Leg., -
1961.  Hearings before the  Subcommittee on Fisheries and
Wildlife Conservation of the Committee on Merchant Marine
and Fisheries, House of Rep., 87th Congress, first session
on Law Enforcement Activities.  H. R. 1182 - to create the
Wyandotte National Wildlife Refuge.)
         Briefly, this testimony points out that  local,
state, and  federal agencies have been lax in the  enforce-
ment of existing pollution  abatement acts.
         The establishment  of the Wyandotte National Wild-
life Refuge last year by an act of Congress emphasizes

-------
                                                      375
the -interest that federal wildlife people have In saving the
Detroit River habitat for wildlife.  The national importance
of these waters  in protecting our waterfowl resources is also
demonstrated by  the movements of ducks frequenting these
waters.  Waterfowl banded at the mouth of the river in
connection with  recent  studies by the Department of Con-
servation have been recovered in twenty-nine different states
and six provinces of Canada,  (Posplchal, Leo - 1956,  Water-
fowl  Surveys and Investigations on Great Lakes Marshes.
Final Report Project No, 45-R - Federal Aid In Wildlife
Restoration Act.)
         This habitat Is of special importance because it
is one of the main resting and feeding areas for canvasbacks
migrating from their nesting grounds in Manitoba to the
east  coast with  many remaining here for the winter.  It is
a vital link in  the chain of selected areas used as hered-
itary stopping points.  The canvasback is a species in such
short supply as  to warrant its being placed on the protected
list  during the  last two hunting seasons.
Surveys to Identify the Problem
         A number of surveys and studies have been carried
on In regard to mortality of waterfowl In this part of the
state.  From the evidence obtained there can be no doubt
as to the seriousness of the losses due directly of in-
directly to pollution of various kinds.  These studies

-------
                                                      376
started in 1941, were discontinued during the war years,
and resumed again after the war.  Studies of the types of
Industrial waste that affect waterfowl are of particular
significance to this group.
         In order toobtain information, trapping and banding
involving some 30,OOO ducks was carried out during the winter
months from 19^9 through 1952.  Examinations were made of
all these birds to determine weights, species, sex, and
age.  Periodic aerial censuses of the area have enabled
us to secure data concerning migration periods, numbers of
waterfowl present In given area, species composition, ice
conditions, and extent of mortality.
         A map of aquatic food plants was prepared for the
lower third of the river and a portion of Lake Erie.  The
food beds were rated to indicate      their  value for ducks.
Many hundreds of dead waterfowl, picked up in the study
area, were autopsled to determine the causes of death.
Bacteriological examinations, chemical analyses for toxic
substances, and other techniques  supplemented the normal
type of post-mortem examination.  The affects of certain
industrial wastes on waterfowl  were  evaluated by experi-
ment s.
          In summary, data was gathered from  examinations
of live-trapped ducks, autopsies  of  dead  birds, and results
of experiments.

-------
                                                      377

         Records of local weather conditions were kept

throughout each winter trapping season.  (Hunt and Ewlng,

1953* reviewed these findings.)  (Hunt, George S. and Ewing,

Howard E. - 1953.  Industrial Pollution and Michigan Water-

fowl.  Trans. N. A. Wildlife Conference 18:366-368.)

Mortalities and other Damaging Effects

         From these studies and others that followed we

learned there are two basic types of mortality, both en-

countered most frequently in winter.  Most spectacular is

the mass die-off, occurring for short periods of time and

attracting a great deal of public attention.  Less obvious

are the deaths talcing place at a low daily rate but which

probably represent a fairly high seasonal total.  The mass

die-offs usually involve birds of normal weights while

birds in the latter group usually are subnormal.  Identi-

fying "cause" or "effect" of the various factors that may

be involved is difficult and frequently requires a rather

thorough check.

         In some cases more than one type of pollution was

identified as the cause of death but, in general, oil flows

were involved.

         The more spectacular losses since 19^8 follow:

         1.   February 1948 - minimum estimated loss 10,000;
                             1,200 birds recovered for ex-
                             amination. (Miller, H. J. -
                             Waterfowl Survey on Saginaw
                             Bay, Lake St. Clair, Detroit
                             River, and Lake Erie.  Final

-------
                                                     378

                            Report Project No. 13-R -
                            Federal Aid in Wildlife
                            Restoration Act.  Also, Game
                            Division Report No. 642.

        2.  October 30, 1948 - estimated loss 1,000; 52
                               dead ducks recovered.
                               (Miller, H. J. - 1948
                                Game Division, Michigan
                                Department of Conservation,
                                Report No. 1007
        3.  March 1949

        4.  March 1950

        5. Feb.-March 1951

        6. Oct.-Nov. 1952
- 76 dead ducks recovered.*

- 871 dead ducks recovered.*

- 250 dead ducks recovered.*

- 200 dead ducks recovered.*
        7. March to May 1952 - estimated loss 800; 180
                               dead ducks recovered.
        8. 1953



        9. 1954



       10. February 1955


       11. February 1956

       12. March I960
- 226 dead ducks recovered;
  119 lost to oil during live-
  trapping operations.

- 171 dead ducks recovered;  67
  lost to oil during llve-
  trapping operations.

- estimated loss 2,600; 956
 dead ducks recovered.

- 191 dead ducks recovered.*

- estimated loss 12,000; 1,056
  dead ducks recovered.
  (Foote, James E. - 1960
   Game Division Memorandum
   No. 254, Pointe Mouillee
   State Game Area)
            *reliable estimates of total losses lacking
         For clarification the pollutants are discussed

separately under the following headings.

-------
                                                      379


Oil


         Regardless of associated complications, oil flows


constitute a serious factor, whether the effect is direct


or indirect.  Considerable literature exists attesting to


the incapacitating and fatal effects of oil on water birds


and on animals.  A brief review of these effects will suf-


fice,  (l) Oil mats feathers or fur permitting exposure of


cold water to reach the slcin; (2) starvation may result due


to reduced mobility, either swimming or flying; (3) actual


drowning may occur; and (4) sickness may result due to in-


gestion  of oil.
                                                            ^

         In addition to petroleum oils are the greases, fats


and various oily compounds from domestic sewage.


         Diving ducks, such as canvasback, redhead, and


scaup, abundant here, are particularly vulnerable to oil


as these species feed almost exclusively in aquatic areas,


and if they cannot go onto the water, will starve or die of


exposure during inclement weather.


         A study of pollution of the Detroit River, made


during 1946-1948 by the International Joint Commission, dis-


closed that an average of 16,280 gallons of oil entered the


river daily. (International Joint Commission - 1931*


Report of the International Joint Commission, U. S. and


Canada, on pollution of boundary waters.  Wash, and Ottawa.)


         While the volume of oil on the river has been re-

-------
                                                      380
duoed greatly since that date, oil continues to be a problem,,
The amount of oil required to impair a duck varies greatly
with weather conditions, but studies of oil removed from
ducks killed by oil flows show that small amounts can be
fatal.  Waterfowl exposed to oil have been examined after
death and it was found that only one gram of petroleum oil
could be extracted from the feathers.  (Hunt, George s. -
1961.  Waterfowl Losses on the Detroit River, Due to Oil
Pollution.  Publication No. 7, Great Lakes Research Division^
Institute of Science and Technology, University of Michigan)
         During periods of mild weather many ducks exposed
to oil survive, as evidenced by the examination of ducks
bagged by hunters at Polnte Mouillee State Gaaie Area.  Ex-
amination of 1,629 ducks of all species from October 30
through November  13, 1952, showed  21 per cent had  oil  on
their feathers.
         The frequency  of  occurrence of oil slicks at  the
mouth of the river during  winter  and spring periods from
1950 through 1955 was  recorded.   Oil slicks were  noted
about one-third  of the  time.   The record  follows.

-------
                                    Winter Periods
                                                  Number of days
Per cent of days
Period of observation
12-18-50
12-17-51
12-15-52
12-28-53
1-3-55

6-25-5^
6-15-55
thru 5-1-51
" 4-30-52
11 4-27-53
" 4-30-54
11 3-3-55

thru 8-9-54
11 8-25-55
Number of days oil noted
115
108
91
82
52
Summer Periods
21
6
19
20
36
45
28

12
3
oil noted
17
19
40
55
54

57
50
(Hunt, George S. - 1961.   Waterfowl Losses  on the  Detroit River, Due to Oil Pollution.
                          Publication No. 7,  Great Lakes Research Division, Institute
                          of Science and Technology,  University of Michigan.
                                                                                             CD

-------
                                                      382



          During the 20-month period  from  August,  I960, to



March,  1962,  Water Resources Commission personnel  made 197



trips on  the  river to record observations.  On  these  197



trips the quantities of effluent  seen warranted 69 not ifi-



oatlons to industry and 43  to municipalities that  pollutants



were being discharged into  the river.  Oil occurred in the



major portion of the recorded cases.   In other  words, in



20 months 112 notifications were  issued.



Botulism




          The  first serious  losses due to botulism  east of the



Mississippi River were  observed beginning September 10,



1941, in  the  marshes at the mouth of  the Raisin River in



Monroe  County.   Losses  were confined  to the  vicinity of the



Raisin  River  with its heavy load  of paper mill  wastes.



Later in  the  fall the outbreak spread  to the marshes of



Maumee Bay near  the  Ohio state line.   Losses were  estimated



at 10,000 waterfowl.  Pollution due to decomposing organic



matter dumped  into the  Raisin River was the  principal factor



in developing  the necessary environment  for  the  growth of



the micro-organism (Clostrldium botullnum type  C).



         There was a  re-occurrence of  botulism  in  1942 in



late August but the  losses  were small  by  comparison.  Some



domestic  fowl were involved.   Control  was  obtained by estab-



lishment  of a standard  for  the Raisin  River, set as 5 ppm. of



dissolved oxygen  to control  the anaerobic  organism responsible

-------
                                                      383



for the poisoning.  This was accomplished by the Water



Resources Commission restricting the discharge of waste



or plant effluents entering the river and prohibiting the



deposition of settieable waste or sewage solids.  (Miller,



H. J. -1943.  Waterfowl Survey on Saglnaw Bay, Lake St.



Clalr, Detroit River, and Lake Erie.  Final Report Project



No. 13-R - Federal Aid In Wildlife Restoration Act.  Also,



Game Division Report No. 642.)



         Luckily, we have not experienced botulism losses



since the early 1940's.



Phosphorus



         Phosphorus poisoning occurred during the heavy oil



losses of 19^8.  It was specifically identified as it



affected, largely, ducks of the type commonly referred to



as dabblers, such as black ducks and mallards, which were



attracted to a site having a deposit of free phosphorus be-



cause grain was placed in the river in an effort to save



the "diving"ducks that were immobilized by oil.  These



birds were concentrated in the ice-free areas and the ad-



jacent river banks below the Trenton plant of the Detroit



Edison Company.  Combined efforts of the Water Resources



Commission, the Conservation Department, and the offender



quickly eliminated the source of trouble.  (Oeming, L. F. -



I960.  Reports on file, Water Resources Commission.)




Fatty Acids, Solvents, and Detergents

-------
                                                      384


         The losses In I960 were attributed to the wastes


from domestic sewage bypassed into the Rouge and Ecorse


rivers, combined with oil losses from Industries.  This


was an abnormal loss during construction work carried out


by Wayne County.  More detail is available in reports in the


Water Resources Commission^ file.  (Oemlng, L. F. - I960.


Reports on file, Water Resources Commission.)


         There is not enough known as to the effects sol-


vents and detergents may have in the losses discussed here,


but the potential for damage exists and must be recognized.


We know that small amounts of detergents can waterlog a duck,.
                                                            t

Small amounts of detergents also are Injurious to food


plants.  As little as 2.5 ppm.  of sodium alkyl aryl sulfron-


ate, the active ingredient in detergent, prevents growth


of Potamogetons, a favored type of food plant.  In this


connection, it is Important to  remember that many industrial


effluents may have a disastrous effect on  the water plants


and minute animals that  support wildlife population.  The


Indirect effects of pollution on wildlife  may thus be very


serious even when no direct losses occur.


Iron-oxide and Turbidity


         Discolored and  turbid  water inhibits or eliminates


the growth of submerged  aquatics that  serve directly as


food for wildlife and also support various forms of  Invert


tebrates which provide animal  foods.

-------
                                                      385

         The red waters of the Trenton Channel and the

milky waters of numerous other sources need attention.

         A comparison of the number of wild celery

(Vallisneria americana) tubers in the lower reaches of the

Detroit River shows a 96 per cent decrease in food plants

since the establishment of steel plants on the Trenton

Channel.

         Samples taken in 195^* before the plants were in

operation, are compared to samples taken on the same portions

of the river in 1958, after the mills were in operation.

The finding follows:
                                         Tubers per sq. yd.
Transect          Number of samples      1951*	1958

    A

    B

    C

    D

    £

    F



(Miller, H. J. - 1958.  Waterfowl Foods, Trenton Channel,

Lower Detroit River.  Game Division Report No. 2186.)

         Water Resources Commission's orders recently

forced installation of corrective measures and the iron-

oxide problem may be partially solved, but only time will

tell.  It is our understanding that over 100 tons per day,
3
6
3
6
3
2
23
279
312
75
0
54
161
881
10
10
5
0
8
_§.
38
                                                    GPO 820819—B-15

-------
                                                      386



previously dumped In the river, are now being recovered.



Thus, the problem has been partly corrected and a great deal



of raw material has been saved.



Problems Defined



         The Detroit River has claimed a heavy toll of win-



tering ducks over the past two decades.  The canvasbaok and



scaup constitute the greatest portion of the annual loss



while redheads, black ducks, and mallards are involved to a



much lesser extent.  The reduction of oanvasback and redhead



population is especially significant in view of the current



low numbers of these species.  The factors responsible for



losses of these waterfowl and the destructive effects of



pollution on waterfowl habitat are complex.  With the growth



of new industry and the increase in population these prob-



lems will become more complicated in the future.  If we are



to retain our wildlife resources in this area for future



generations we must make waste control more effective.



Discharge of effluents has occurred over a wide range of



attendant circumstances, from wanton disregard of law to



pure accident.



         To cope with the situation we firmly believe that



the monitoring system set up in August, I960, by the Water



Resources Commission is the proper approach.  The monitoring



procedure, adequately employed, provides for early detection



and also provides for identifying the source of pollution

-------
                                                      38?



when losses ocour.  Backed by adequate enforcement the



present system of vigilant patrol and frequent checks of



individual discharge outlets could cope with the enforce-



ment phase.



         Also necessary for future controls is additional



research.  A major problem is the absence of qualitative



studies as to (l) toxioity levels of birds and mammals,



(2) toxicity levels of aquatic plants and invertebrates,



and (3) normal histology of such species of wildlife as



waterfowl.



         We need to be able to identify the effects of pol-



lution, Industrial and domestic, on aquatic plants and



invertebrates.  We also need to study the effects of thermal



changes in these waters.



         In retrospect, we started with good quality water



and habitat productive of wildlife which, in turn, provide



for recreational opportunities in the form of hunting and



fishing, and 'hatching."



         In looking to the future we have two clear-cut and



opposite choices: (l) permit the Detroit River to degener-



ate to a situation like that which exists on the Rouge—



known to many as a "fermenting, oil-covered, open cesspool";



(2) employ technical skills to meet the pollution problems



and adequately enforce abatement regulations to provide



for the multiple uses of these waters.

-------
                                                      388



         The Detroit River-Lake Erie waters now serve as



a vast area of natural wildlife habitat and as a vast



area for public recreation.  The quality of this water is



extremely important, both for people and for the various



forms of fish and wildlife which are dependent upon it.



Action is needed to resolve conflicts for the uses of these



waters.  Certainly, these wildlife values and recreational



values should be recognized as a major public benefit which



must be preserved for the future.



         Mr. Chairman, I also have a little supplemental



statement with regard to the fish.



         THE CHAIRMAN:  Do you want to answer questions on



these first?



         DR. HEUSTIS:  May he present the supplemental state-



ment first and then have the questions on the whoteworks




at once?



         THE CHAIRMAN:  Certainly.



         MR. MILLER:  The supplemental statement has been




filed with you, Mr. Reporter.



         Fishing quality in Michigan Waters of the Detroit




River and Lake Erie.



         A supplemental report pertaining to fishing quality



in Michigan waters  of the Detroit River and Lake Erie  is



presented as a part of the Michigan Conservation Department's



statement.  It is being presented for the Fish Division of

-------
                                                      389



the Department, to reduce the number of representatives



and to save time.



         Data on kinds of fish taken by anglers and on



quality of fishing in Michigan waters of the Detroit River



and Lake Erie for the years 1928-1960 are on file in the



Institute for Fisheries Research of the Michigan Department



of Conservation, and are summarized in two attached tables.



These angling records are obtained by Conservation Officers



and constitute what is known as the General Creel Census.



The data are believed to be adequate to detect long-time



trends in angling quality and long-time changes in species



composition of the catch, but are not adequate for more de-



tailed analysis.



         The principal species of fish recorded by the gen-



eral creel census on the Detroit River are:  yellow perch,



rook bass, white bass, walleye, sheepshead, smallraouth bass



and northern pike.  As to long-time trends, the records



show a decline in the catch of walleyes during recent years-



for 1939-19^6 the officers obtained records on 7^1 anglers



who had 677 walleyes; for 1953-1960 the records are for



2,621 anglers who had 510 walleyes.  For the other principal



sport species In the Detroit River, the records do not show



any large change in anglers' catch over the past 20 years;



there are relatively few records for the first 10 years of



the census (1928-1938).

-------
                                                      390
         Over the past 30 years, creel census records do
not show any great change In catch per hour (angling qual-
ity) by sport fishermen on the Detroit River.  During 1928-
1960 officers contacted 3,637 anglers who had fished 11,479
hours and had caught 12,290 fish—a catch per hour of 1.07
fish.  Catch per hour during the last ten years of the period
was somewhat higher than during earlier years; but the greater
number of fish caught during the past 10 years was coinci-
dent with a decline In catch of the walleye (a large and
preferred species).
         A netting survey of the fish fauna around Sugar
and Stony islands in the Detroit River was made by the
Institute for Fisheries Research during September of 1952
(results summarized in Institute for Fisheries Research
Report No. 1350.)  In 1952 the river in the vicinity of
these islands had a rich fauna of native species including
food and game species, forage species, anl  predatory species.
Records from the general creel census for the Detroit River
do not show any striking changes in anglers' catch since
1952.
         For Michigan waters of Lake Erie the general creel
census records show that the yellow perch makes up a major
portion (about 70#) of the anglers1 catch.  Other important
species include:  rook bass, bullheads, white bass, walleye
and northern pike.  Since 1954 the recorded catch has been
mostly perch, suggesting a decline in other important species.

-------
                                                      391



There has not been a marked drop in oat oh per hour in Lake



Erie, but apparently there has been some decline in quality



of species composition.



         Fishing quality in the Detroit River and Lake Erie



compares favorably with angling quality in inland non-trout



waters of Michigan, and favorablywith angling quality in



other connecting waters of the Great Lakes.  In spite of



a decline in the walleye population, the sport fishery of



the Detroit River and Lake Erie is a valuable recreational



resource and should be preserved by protection from pol-



lution.



         I have some tables attached to my statement con-



taining the general creel census records for the Michigan



waters of Lake Erie and the Michigan waters of the Detroit



River for the years 1928 to I960, which I would like to



have made a part of the record.



         (The Tables referred to are as follows;)

-------
number
Tear of
anglers
1928 ...*
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
Total
...*
———^—
Total
hours
279
18
Fish
305
14
Catch Small- Large- Blue_
per mouth mouth .^
hour bass bass
1.09 	 10
0.78 ... 	
kin- ^OCK Grapples Perch
. bass
seed
4 42
2
No records
31
30
98
44
114
129
530
182
117
22
335
40
1.03 	
0*17
0.63 ... 35
0. 22 3 ... • • •
...
... ...
34
...
244
• • * • • •

113

... 96
5
Walleye
— -

...

1
2
" * • •
...
No records
No records
No records
No records
75
204
72
113
53
118
60
46
13
32
340
670
257
362
298
559
269
836
34
82
95
234
159
195
115
386
402
in
87
34
0.28 	 	 ...
0. 35 1 . . « • • •
0.62 7 1
0.54 3 ... 7
0. 39 ... • • • ...
0.69 ... 	
1.49 21
0.47 	
2.56 	
0.41 	

25
42
2 40
3 57
13
78
4
... ...
... ...
... ...

... 2
12 38
59
1 8
17
* t • • • t

AA
... 28

28
110
44
48
83
227
M * £±
148
•
...
...
No records
No records
27
79
991
12.54
No records
45
231
580
233
271
189
540
1.750
936
763
200
1.238
855
1.415
464
1 , 06 3 ... ...
2.29 1 1
0.49 37 ... ...
1.51
0. 61 5 ... ...
No records
658
603
3.637
1.294
1.569
11.479
1.417
3,059
12.290
1.10 82 ... •••
1. 95 53 ... ...
1.07 216 37 17
...

35
251
2 272
161
183

91
8 684
19 2, 014
AA«
... 991

35
63
9 131
319
1 131

1 805
12 1. 847
36 4,986

...

50
35
124
47
87

84
83
1,291
* Number of anglers not recorded in 1928 and 1929

-------
General creel census records for Michigan waters of the Detroit River, 1928-1980 (continued)
North- _ „ rhonnt>. Fresh-
YCar pike *c*«8 ««* CarP SUCkCrB SmCU Wd^
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
Total
O ••• ••* * * •
. • . » » • » . • •••
No records
... ... ... ...
, _ , ... ...
• . • 18 ... 2
1 ... 6 13
No records
No records
No records
No records
* * • ••• • . » •••
1 3 1 *•• • • •
* •»• •*• •••
*•• ••• ••* •••
• •* ••• • • • •*
17 ••• •** •••
2 ••• ••• •*•
•*• » • • •*• *•*
32 ••• • • • • * •
o ••• ••• •••
No records
No records
... ... ... ...
No records
8 ... ... ...
15 ... 2 ...
15 2 1 ...
7 * • • • • • •••
• * • ••* - • « •••
No records
11 ... ^ ...
O ... ... U
140 28 13 22
1
• • • • • *

2
6
1
• » • * • *




• • • • » •
12
4
• * • • • •
• • • • * •
» • • • • »
... ...
• • t • • •
• * * • « •
• * • • • •


* • • • • •

• ••» • • •
• • * • • •
2
1 1
... ...

30
87
20 118
» • • .
12

1
6
145
5




8
3
• • •
7
1
• * *
• • •
• • *
• • •
• • *


...

• • •
25
78
5
12

252
87
647
Bur- White Chub g Red- Mu8kenunge
bot bass norse
••* ••• ••• ••• •••
• • • * • • •«•• •. ••• **«

• •• • • t *•• ••• •*«
• * * •*• ••• ••• •••
4 ••• ••• *•• *••
* • * o 1 ••* •••




* • • 27 * • • * *
• , • 1 •«• * •••
.'.. ... ... ... »••
46 ... 18 1
2 ... 13 2
• • • 4D • . • * » • .
... 204 ... 23
91 ^
__, •»• . * w .*•
* • • ••« •*. ••• •*•
... 	


• • * •«• ... ... *.»

. , . 69 *•* ... •••
845 	
180 ... 2
874 ... 	
• * . ^Tl » » . * ...

• • * 0« *•• ... t » •
« • • lOw ... ... •••
4 2,593 1 74 4
...
• • .


• . *
...
...





...
* • •
...
...
• • *
...
...
...



...

...
...
...
. * •
. * •



1

-------
Year
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
Number ^^
OS
, hours
anglers
i
* 2, 301
... * 2, 605
595
638
419
288
74
72
6
89
2,086
1.947
1,123
945
184
284
16
244
Catch
Fish per
hour
2,168 0.94
2,753 1.06
1,529 0.73
2,552 1.31
1,368 1.22
1,338 1.42
446 2.42
830 2.92
19 1.19
131 0.54
Rock Yellow Wall- Northern
bass perch eye pike
312
287
421
181
43
66
12
10
• • •
. . .
1,499
2,186
761
1,179
790
380
185
238
5
95
3
134
42
111
24
444
• 4 •
444
4
44*
24
5
3
75
2
4*4
• 4 4
1
44*
4*4
Bull- Channel
heads catfish
162
70
237
931
418
623
224
330
444
12
4

7
. . .
16
15
444
• • 4
444
444
White Fresh"
Carp bass *^
6
8
1
31
29
192
5
213
• 4 4
24
13
36
444
7
444
4*4
444
444
444
444
41
• • 4
15
2
4 4 *
3
13
15
9
444
No records
200
112
136
812
544
754
661
441
669
91
358
37
68
1.06S
No
1*9
326
437
55
No
924
378
475
2,928
2,250
2,939
2,135
1,581
1,861
290
848
98
185
5,034
records
292
701
1,053
103
records
364 949
57
274
639 0.69
152 0.40
572 1.20
4,691 1,60
3,938 1.75
4,843 1.65
2,700 1.26
1,904 1.20
2,719 1.46
512 1.77
908 1.07
160 1.63
924 4.99
3.484 1.69

1,622 5.55
991 1.41
885 0.84
82 0.80

3,415 3.60
1,329 4.85
48
18
34
147
116
258
17
191
444
10
19
444
444
1,809

4 • •
444
• • 4
444

444
2
253
115
435
4,161
3,325
2,792
2,470
973
2,288
485
832
158
924
4,762

1,622
942
885
77

3.362
1.287
12
4
33
32
145
103
4
31
4*4
5
4*4
444
444
636

• 4 4
11
• 4 •
• • 4

• * 4
4*4
2
12
1
8
5
241
134
81
431
3
52
1
• * *
88

• * *
• 4 4
* 4 *
2

4 • •
4 • •
56
3
7
28
72
298
25
1
. . .
444
444
4 4 *
444


44*

. . •


. ..
444
10
444
7
16
45
40
444
444
• * 4
444
• 4 4
* * 4
4 • *
• • *

• 4 •
17
444
• 4 •

9
40
2
444
15
1
40
444
4*4
4 * •
1
4*4
444
* 4 4
44*
...

• 4 •
• 4 •
444
2

4*4
* 4 4
2
444
30
244
146
669
23
620
4 • •
4*4
444
4 * *
4*4
544

4 • •
• * *
4 4 4
1

444
• • *
22
4 4 4
44*
47
43
238
6
* * *
• 4 •
* 4 4
• • •
• • •
* * •
443

• • •
21
• • •


44
4 4 4
Total   9,488   37.033  54,604  1.47  4,001   39,464  1.334
* Number of anglers not recorded in 1928 and 1929.
1,171   3,497
226
570  2,335    962

-------
General creel census records for Michigan waters of Lake Erie, 1928-1960 (continued)
Small- Large-
Year mouth mouth
bass bass
1928
1929
1930
1931
1932
1933
1934
1935
1936
1937
1938
1939
1940
1941
1942
1943
1944
1945
1946
1947
1948
1949
1950
1951
1952
1953
1954
1955
1956
1957
1958
1959
1960
Total
11 2
2
15 1
1
5 1
12
« • « • . •
... ...
... ...
... ...
No records
1 32
... ...

2
1
2
• • * • • *
* • * * • •
• • • •
• » • • • •
* • • * • *
• • • e • .
• * * • • •
122 3
No records
... ...
... ...
... ...
... ...
No records
* » • • * •
• * • • * •
174 39
Blue- Pumpkin-
gill seed
• * •
3
...
• • .
...
13
...
...
...
...

101
• • •
• * •
1
...
7
15
• • •
• • *
• • *
• • •
e e •
e • *
1

...
• • *
. . .
...

. . .
• * «
141
87
17
24
31
40
30
7
7
1
. . .

9
...
...
...
...
194
5
• • »
...
9
...
* • •
• • *
36

...
. . .
. . .
. . .

. ..i
...
477
Grapples Dogfish Shad Sucker Redhorse
... 1 ... 23 ... •
... ... 3 2 ...
... ... ... * *
. . . ... •*. « •<*
... ... ... ... ...
... ... . . . 4 ...
... ... ... ... ...
... ... ... v ...
... ... ... ••• •••
... ... ... ... ...

87 • ••• ••• ...
... ... ... ... ...
10 	
1 ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... .. .
X • * • * * • **• •**
1 •»• ••* ••• •••
7 	
... ... .«• * *..
... ... ... ... •••
d •** • . • *•• • • »
1 	
... ... ... ••• ...
40 	 	

... ... 	
. . . ... ... ... ...
... ... ... ... ...
• • * • • * • • • » • • • • •

• • • * • • » » » ••• •••
...
153 3 3 40 1
Goldfish Sauger
• * • • • *
• • • * • •
• • • » • •
• • • . • •
• • » • * •
• • * • • •
• * • • * •
10
• 4 • • * •
• • • • * •

• » . • » •
• • * • • •
» * • • • »
3
• * • • • •
» • * • • •
... ...
* • » • • *
• • • t * •
... ...
• • • • • *
• * * * • *
• * • • • •
• • • • * •

* • * • • •
e » • t • •
... ...
• • . • • •

* . . • • •
* * • • . •
1O 3

-------
                                                      392



         THE CHAIRMAN:  Are there any comments or questions'^



I have just one for the purposes of clarification, Mr.



Miller.  On Page 6 of your original report in your first



paragraph you state, "During the 20-month period from



August, I960, to March, 1962, Water Resources Commission



personnel made 197 trips on the river to record observations;.



On these 197 trips the quantities of effluent seen warranted,



69 notifications to Industry and 43 to municipalities that



pollutant were being discharged into the river.  Oil



occurred in the major portion of the recorded cases.  In



other words, in 2O months 112 notifications were issued,"



         Were you here this morning, Mr. Miller?



         MR. MILLER:  Yes.




         THE CHAIRMAN:  This morning Mr. Oeming indicated



a rating system for the industrial wastes, and Mr. Pierce



indicated one for municipal wastes, and both  of them  seem



to indicate that they were almost all operating in a  satis-



factory manner.  I don't think  I understand this situation.



If they were all being operated in a satisfactory manner



how did you find 112 violations?



         MR. MILLER:  This is a report from the Commission



and maybe there is a difference here in identification  of



notification.  It was not a  legal summons  or  a formal re-



quest by the Commission as a body, but a  statement by the



field man who was making the check.  Does  that clarify  the

-------
                                                      393



question?



          THE CHAIRMAN:  It explains it.  I don't know that



it clarifies it.  Thank you.



          MR. MILLER:  There is pollution occurring, and



oil Is occurring on the river.



          DR. HEUSTIS:  I next have a statement to enter



into the record.  It is a statement by Mr. Keith Wilson



of the Waterways Commission of the State of Michigan.  Mr.



Wilson's statement will be entered into the record at this



point and will be given to the secretary.



          (The statement referred to is as follows:)



          STATEMENT OP THE MICHIGAN STATE WATERWAYS COM-



          MISSION AT THE DETROIT RIVER-LAKE ERIE CONFER-



          ENCE, CALLED BY THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH,



          EDUCATION AND WELFARE, TO ASSIST THE STATE IE



          IDENTIFYING, AND RECOMMENDING METHODS FOR



          CORRECTING POLLUTION OF THE DETROIT RIVER AND



          LAKE ERIE



          The Michigan State Waterways Commission is the



agency designated by the Legislature and the Governor to



represent the State of Michigan on matters pertaining to



navigation.  Our primary role is to construct refuge harbors



and docking facilities for recreational watercraft, but we



do participate extensively with the Federal Government and



units of local government in the completion of commercial

-------
                                                        394



facilities.  In this role, we are on occasions requested to



participate in conferences and studies relating to watercraft



pollution and have gained some knowledge of the general prob-



lems in this regard present in the State of Michigan.



          As of December 31, 1961, a total of 428,947 water-



craft were registered in the State of Michigan. In addition



to this number, this agency estimates that there are approx-



imately 100,000 craft not registered or not covered by the



registration provisions, making our total recreational boating



population approximately 530,000 at the present time.  There



are a large number of wateroraft brought into this State each



summer by residents of other states and countries, and esti-



mates of the number of craft Involved from this source vary frtpm



100,000 to 400,000, although it is generally agreed that the



vast majority of these craft consist principally of outboards



towed on trailers.



          We do not have accurate statistics on the type of



equipment carried aboard recreational craft so that it is im-



possible to determine accurately the number equipped with



marine toilets.  However, of the more than 500,000 boats lo-



cated In the State of Michigan, it is our belief that less



thaft 50,OOO of them would contain marine toilets.  It is



assumed that no more than 20,000 of the craft from other



States in use on our waters would be similarly equipped.



Since all of these boats are scattered throughout the State

-------
                                                        395
along our 3,000 miles of Great Lakes shoreline or on one of
our more than 10,000 inland lakes, we do not believe that
any single concentration of craft exists sufficient to be a
major cause of pollution.
          Because watercraft are not generally In daily use
and because it is usually more convenient to use shore side
restroom facilities than those provided on boats, we feel
that there is a good deal less pollution by recreational
watercraft than bare statistics would indicate.  However, It
continues to be the policy of this agency to cooperate fully
with any governmental unit concerned with pollution and /or pub-
lic health as a result of watercraft activity.  We have par-
ticipated with the Michigan Department of Health and the
Water Resources Commission in a study of treatment devices
commercially available which could be used on recreational
craft to relieve whatever pollution exists from this source,
no matter how slight.  Unfortunately, there are at present no
known commercially available treatment devices for recreation-
al craft which meet current health standards.  When such
devices are reasonably available and adaptable to such use,
and when the need for them is established, this agency has
agreed to assist the Water Resources Commission and the
Health Department of the State of Michigan in securing the
necessary legislation to require their use on the waters of
this state.

-------
                                                        396



          Our experience in complaints relating to pollution



of water by recreational craft indicates that, by and large,



the majority of complaints received involve items which have



been thrown overboard rather than discharged through a



marine toilet.  It is a common practice today on the part of



commercial ship crews to dispose of garbage and wastes by the,



simple method of throwing them overboard and much of this



garbage and debris is of a nature that permits it to float



to the nearest shore where it remains an eyesore or a health



factor until removed.  It is this type of activity which we



believe is reasonably capable of regulation and which should



be investigated as a part of this study.



          In all of our public docks, trash receptacles are



always available and they are emptied regularly to provide



a reasonable method of disposing of such materials.  Our



investigations indicate that recreational boatmen are gen-



erally reluctant to dispose of materials of this nature over-



board and that they will wait until after docking in order to



place the wastes in the receptacles provided for this pur-



pose.  This isn't usually much of an inconvenience since very



few such craft are equipped to cruise for more than one or two
                                                             >'


days before having to dock for gasoline and supplies.  How-



ever, freighters and other commercial craft do not make port



so often and the temptation to dispose of their wastes over-



board is great when considering the storage problem presented



by retaining them on board.  The only answer that we can see

-------
                                                        397

to the problem is the establishment of enforceable and en-

forced regulations requiring suitable equipment to be carried

on board to provide for the burning or disposing of such

waste materials, and we urge the U. S. Department of Health,

Education and Welfare to give careful consideration to such

a requirement.

          I wish to thank you for this opportunity to present

this statement and assure you of our complete cooperation

in your further studies and investigations of this most ser-

ious problem.

                               /$/ Keith Wilson
                                   Director


          DR. HEUSTIS:  I would next call upon Mr. Glenn C.

Richards, of the Department of Public Works for the City of

Detroit.  Do you have a prepared statement?

          STATEMENT OF GLENN C. RICHARDS, COMMISSIONER,

          DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, ROOM 513

          CITY-COUNTY BUILDING, DETROIT 26, MICHIGAN

          MR. RICHARDS:  Yes, I have0

          DR. HEUSTIS:  Do you care to supplement it or

would you like to read it?

          MR. RICHARDS:  No, I have copies here for the

people, and I think they can all read it as well as I can.

          Engineers and health officials of Detroit and the

surrounding communities have been well aware for many years
                                                   GPO 820819-B-16

-------
                                                         398



 of the importance of a good sanitary and storm water sewer



 system to protect the environment and health of our commuv




nity.  Comprehensive studies in the past have indicated  — and



 we are still convinced of the fact — that a well designed



 combined system can adequately handle both storm water  and



 sanitary sewage more efficiently and with adequate protection-



 to health.




           Based on these studies, the sewer system and  dis-



 posal system for the City of Detroit and many of the sur-



 rounding communities has been designed and constructed  as the



 area has Increased in population.  The sewage treatment plant



 and the interceptors were built to the highest standards at



 the time of their construction and are well ahead of similar



 facilities in other metropolitan areas.  These facilities



 have been progressively improved throughout the years.



           The most serious nuisance to health in the City of



 Detroit, in the opinion of qualified sanitary engineers and




 health authorities, is the flooding of basements (both in



 homes and in business places) during periods of heavy rain-




 fall.




           Prior to 19^7, basement flooding in the City of



 Detroit was widespread over the entire area of 140 square



 miles.  From 19^3 to 19^5, studies were made which resulted



 in a "Master Plan for Storm-Sanitary Relief Sewers."  In



 1947 appropriations were made to start construction of the

-------
                                                        399
Master Plan Program.
          From 1947 to date, $99,000,000 has been spent, or
is encumbered by contract, on the Master Plan Program In
addition to the millions spent on improvements to treatment
facilities.  There remains about $140,000,000 of construction
to complete the Master Plan and of this $50,000,000 has al-
ready been financed.
          Design work on the $50,000,000 program is now pro-
ceeding as fast; as possible and it is expected that all of
the construction will be under contract within four years.
          The construction of the major relief outlets of the
Master Plan will about double the capacity of the Detroit sewer
system.  The design of all the outlets of the Master Plan
has incorporated the feature of "storm-water storage."  The
full benefit of this function of the Detroit Relief System
will not  be fully realized until the system is completed
in 1970.   However, improvement in operation has accrued with
the completion of each new outlet facility.
          Two papers, published by Clyde L. Palmer, City
Engineer of the City of Detroit, are attached hereto which
set forth in some detail the technical basis for the design
of storrawater outlets incorporating the feature of "storm-
water storage."
          Investigation and studies on the problem of handling
stormwater in large combined systems are being continued.

-------
                                                        400
 One Detroit sewer system has been so equipped that very
 pertinent data will now become available as storm expe-
 riences occur.  Studies of this nature are a continuing as-
 signment of the City Engineer's office staff.
           In designing and constructing the major interceptor
 system, full consideration has been given to the  engineering
 feasibility of providing capacity for the many communities
 adjacent to the City of Detroit.  Contracts have  been entered
 into for providing this added  capacity on a revenue producing
 basis so that  the  areas making use of the services offered
 by  the City of Detroit have had the advantages of the city's
 planning without undue burden, which would have been impos-
 sible for the  newer areas to carry during this growth per-
 iod.   Contracts with both Wayne and Oakland  Counties have
 made  it  possible for these counties to plan  their sewage
 programs without the difficult problem of providing com-
 plete  sewage treatment  facilities  of their own.   It is quite
 probable  that  the  entire  metropolitan area will be planned
 so as  to make  full future use  of the Detroit  treatment fa-
 cilities at strategic  locations on  the  Detroit River.
          In conclusion,  I am  sure  that a good  look at the
 record will convince  the  health authorities that Detroit
 and the neighboring communities are  well  aware of their
responsibilities in providing  the best means possible of
disposing of both  sanitary  sewage and storm water and that

-------
                                                        401



by joint        action a good job of preventing pollution



in the receiving waters will be accomplished.



          The City of Detroit, the adjacent counties, and our



neighboring communities, in my opinion, are in agreement



that we are in a good position to continue the good work



which has been done and are perfectly capable of making the



necessary studies to determine the necessary quality of



water for the Detroit River and the contributing streams in



this metropolitan area on the basis of high health standards



and, therefore, request that the study proposed by local



authorities go forward as planned and that the Public Health



Service continue to cooperate with local authorities in



carrying out the proposed study.



          I do want you gentlemen to know that we recognize



in a metropolitan area such as this we have many metropol-



itan problems.  One of them, of course, is sanitation,



and another is water.  We are solving it in this metropol-



itan area by working together with our neighbors and  .our



State officials.  There has been a close relationship in



the 21 years that I have been Commissioner of Public Works



in the City of Detroit,  I have worked on many commissions,



working on this problem, and there has been the closest



cooperation on it between the county and city and State



agencies.   We are very proud of our record here and I am



sure what  will be said and what has been said here will point

-------
                                                        402



up the fact that we are making great progress.



          There is still some pollution we get, but we are



on the job and are spending millions of dollars and have



plans for the future, and are going to do the job for



Detroit, and do it with the state water and health and re-




source division.  We have plenty of help and have attorneys



to enforce the law.  There is no question in my mind we



have to do this job and we will do it.  We ask that this




Committee allow us to go ahead with the research and plan-



ning division of your Department to carry on the project



which we have received a grant for, in cooperation with



the rest of the area with the six county supervisors.  We



will do the job and we hope you will let us go ahead and do




it.



          DR. HEUSTIS:  Would it be agreeable to withhold




questions about Detroit at this time?



          THE CHAIRMAN:  I wonder.  We may lose some of this



if we do not comment on it at this point.  May I make a




brief comment on this now?



          For one thing I don't think there is any doubt



that our Department thinks that in Detroit your area is doing



a reasonable job.  Otherwise we would not have considered




giving you a $100,000 grant, which was awarded.



          MR. RICHARDS:  We appreciate it.



          THE CHAIRMAN:  Again, I don't think  that the work

-------
                                                        403
we are doing here Is intended In any way, in spirit, or in
law, or in any manner, not to be fully compatible with the
work you are doing.  As far as your work is concerned, it
always becomes a problem to the other cities.  For instance,
as to Chicago I hope we will refrain, or at least the Federal
people will have to refrain from comment because there is
a lawsuit there and we are a party to the lawsuit, and we
prefer not to comment in a proceeding like this on the Chicago
situation.  However, in the Potomac River there is a situ-
ation which I would like to comment upon.  I think it is
very interesting that this was brought up.
          There have been conferences such as this under
the same Act, held in the Potomac River.  Two conferences,
in fact, were held.  There is work going on in the Potomac
River.  They have a tremendous storm water overflow problem
in the Potomac too.  We have a schedule established there
and by 1966 all parties agree and believe that the water in
the Potomac River, and In the vicinity of the Metropolitan
Washington area, from a bacterial point of view, will be of
swimming water quality.  You will be able to swim right up
to above Roosevelt Island.  Of course there is a problem of
silt, but that is another question.  I am talking about from
a bacterial point of view.
          The unsightly nuisances will be eliminated and
the water quality will be such that our aquatic biologists

-------
                                                        404



 tell us  it will  permit  the  complete  return of the game fish



 indigenous to that  area.  This  I think we agree shows what




 a cooperative program can do.   We are confidently looking



 forward  to that  in  the  Potomac  River.




          I live right  near the banks of that river and I



 am sure  that the people in  this area are probably looking



 forward  to the same kind of thing here also.  Dr. Heustis.



          DR. HEUSTIS:  Mr. Clyde Palmer of the City of



 Detroit.  Do you have a prepared statement?



          STATEMENT OF  CLYDE L. PALMER, CITY ENGINEER,



          CITY OP DETROIT,  MICHIGAN



          MR. PALMER:   Yes, I do.




          DR. HEUSTIS:  We  would hope you might give one to



 the reporter and will take  as little time as you think would



 be adequate to make your presentation.




          MR. PAIMER:



   STORM WATER OVERFLOWS FROM COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS



                    DETROIT, MICHIGAN



                  BY CLYDE  L. PALMER



                     CITY ENGINEER



                     Introduotion



          The intent of this paper is to present the case in



 favor of combined sewer systems, particularly to serve the




Detroit metropolitan area.



          There can be  little to quarrel with in any effort

-------
                                                        405



to protect the water resources of the country from all pol-



lution.  It is true, however, that a strong case can be



put forward for the reasonable use of water resources to



produce a benefit to the greatest number of people, pro-



viding, however, that such use does not entirely ignore the



needs of minority and special interests groups.



          It is the purpose of this paper to show that a



properly designed combined sewer system, operated under aver-



age conditions, would constitute a reasonable use of the



receiving waters of an area, and until there is a fully



substantiated proof that occasional use for the disposal of



storm overflows is causing damage in excess of the economic



benefits, no expenditure of public funds can be justified.



          It must be admitted that a separate system may



be warranted in the case of a newly developing residential



area where storm waters can still be disposed of on the



land surface or in open channels.  However, it must be



pointed out that even this decision is based more on the



fact that providing for the immediate need for sanitary



service is initially the least expensive than on the merits



of a separate system as compared to  a combined system.



          The case in favor of combined systems will be



presented in the following comments supported by data col-



lected at Detroit, Michigan, and pertaining to Detroit's



system, and would be most applicable to highly urbanized and

-------
                                                        406



complex metropolitan  areas.




        Physical Data on  Detroit's  Sewer  System



          The City of Detroit, encompassing  140 square miles



is roughly triangular in  shape with one side of the triangle



on the Detroit River  and  another side  on  the Rouge River, and



is situated on a rather flat plain  sloping from northwest to



southeast where it is bordered for  about  twelve miles by



the Detroit River.




          The highest  elevation  in  the city, along its north-



erly edge, is about 100 feet above  the Detroit River level



and the land along the Detroit River is from five to ten



feet above the river  level.




          About three-fourths of the city is drained di-



rectly to the Detroit  River and  the balance  to the Rouge



River.




          The discharge of the Detroit River varies between



180,000 and 200,000 cubic feet per  second and beside a



long-range cycle of levels of about four  feet, there is a



seasonal variation of  about two  feet between the January low



and the July high.  Short periods of variation of about the



same magnitude are occasionally  caused by windstorms af-



fecting Lakes St. Glair and Erie.



          The storm flow capacity of the Rouge River is



about 20,000 cubic feet per second,  and the  dry-weather



flows are about 50 cubic feet per second.  A  project is now

-------
                                                        407



being planned to enlarge the capacity of the Rouge to a



capacity of about 30*000 cubic feet per second.



          The computed storm run-off, as a result of a ten-



year storm on the city, is about 50*000 cubic feet per sec-



ond, through 67 storm outlets, 15 on the Rouge River and 52



on the Detroit River.



          The Detroit sewer system is composed of 2,200 miles



of lateral sewers ranging in size from 12 inches to four



feet inside diameter, and about 700 miles of public sewers



ranging in size from 4 feet to 16 feet inside diameter.



The entire system is constructed on the combined plan.



          The Detroit sewage disposal system is composed of



two sanitary interceptor sewers, one along the Detroit



River for about 12 miles, ranging in size from 8 feet to 16



feet inside diameter, and one along the Rouge River for



about 15 miles ranging in size from 4 feet to 12 feet 9



inches Inside diameter.  The two interceptors lead to the



Sewage Treatment Plant, located in the southwesterly corner



of the city at the confluence of the Rouge and Detroit Rivers,



The Sewage Treatment Plant utilizes a primary process com-



posed of a lift station, coarse screens and grit collectors,



plain sedimentation, vacuum filtration, incineration, and



ohlorination, with digester capacity for one-eighth of the



solids volume.  The plant has capacity for four million



people based on 325 gallons per capita per day of sewage flow

-------
                                                       408



resulting In a total capacity of 2,000 cubic feet per second,,



A $32 million program has been approved and is now under  way



to build a plant up to the full four million capacity and to



Improve the process from primary to intermediate treatment.



           Characteristics of Low-Intensity Storms



          The significance of the study of low-intensity



storms and the following data is to emphasize the importance



of these low-intensity storms which, by virtue of their



number alone, accentuate the problem of controlling storm



water overflows.  From studies of the U. S. Weather Bureau



records at Detroit, Michigan, the following information was



obtained concerning low-intensity storms.  The information



here reported has been excerpted from a paper published by



the author in "Sewage and Industrial Wastes," Vol. 22,



No. 2, February 1950.



          1.   Total average rainfall at Detroit,



               Michigan, during the 76 years of



               record is 31.47 inches.



          2.   Of the total annual rainfall, 90$  is



               contriouted by storms of 5/10 inch per



               hour or less.



          3.  Of the total annual rainfall 50# is



               contributed by storms of 1/10 inch



               per hour or less.



          4.   On the average, there are 157 storms

-------
                                                        409
               per year of a trace or more with a
               duration of 14$ of total time.
          5.   On the average, there are 89 storms
               per year of 3/100 inch, or more, with
               a duration of 3$ of total time.
          6.   The above data is most significant in
               the following discussion.
         Relationship Between Interceptor Capacity,
               Sanitary Plow, and Storm Run-Off
          In the studies of the Detroit interceptor system,
it was determined that in terms of the reduction in the num-
ber of storm overflows, an interceptor capacity of 150$ of
the dry-weather flow was most efficient.  However, in order
to be able to take more of the first flush of storms in
local areas, it was decided to establish the interceptor
capacity at 324 gallons per capita per day which is equiv-
alent to about 200$ of dry-weather flow.
          As a result of observations at Detroit, it was con-
cluded that run-off to the sewer system, on the average, did
not occur with the usual storm patterns unless the precip-
itation exceeded 3/100 inch per hour.
          Records of the Detroit Sewage Treatment Plant show
an average dry weather sanitary flow of about 162 gallons
per capita per day.  Reducing this to an area basis indi-
cated that the sanitary flow Is equivalent to 1/100 inch

-------
                                                        410



per hour over the area.



          With an interceptor capacity of 200$ of the



dry-weather flow, allowing a capacity for 1/100 inch per



hour of storm flow, it follows that there would be no over-



flow to the receiving waters unless the storm exceeded 4/100



inch per hour.



          Studies of conditions at Detroit show that on the



average storms of an intensity greater than 4/100 inch per



hour occur for about 2.5$ of the total time in 84 separate



occurrences, with the total duration of 220 hours per year.



As indicated before, assuming there were no diversions to an



interceptor, storm overflows to the receiving waters would



occur for 3$ of the total time in about 89 separate occur-



rences per year.



          Detroit studies indicate that no satisfactory



reduction in the number or duration of storm overflow occur-



rences can be accomplished by any reasonable increase in



interceptor capacity.



          Summarizing the above statements, it appears that



the following conditions obtain.



          Due to the effect of interceptor capacity and



surface absorption alone, the Detroit system should produce



overflows to the receiving waters for about 2.5$ of total



time in about 84 separate occurrences per year.



          On this basis alone, noc more than 2$ of the total

-------
sanitary flow would escape to the receiving waters.



          It can thus be said that the Detroit system,



without any provision for storm water control, would be



efficient in capturing and treating the sanitary flow pro-



duced in the area.



          Attention is called to the fact that the above



statements relate only to the effect of interceptor capacity



and surface absorption in reducing the number of storm



overflows.  Actual Detroit conditions, as a result of the



effect of. design, produce greater efficiency in the handling



of storm overflows and will be discussed in the following



portion of this report.



          One interesting point of information was brought



to light in the Detroit studies of this phenomenon, this



being the fact that the animal population of the city is



about twice that of the human population.



                      Statistical Data



          The following data for the last five years is



presented in order to demonstrate the effect of "volumetric



storage" when designed into a combined system.



          The following tabulation shows that the basis



information of rainfall occurrence under which the sewer



system functioned and is taken from the U.S.W.B. records at



the Detroit City Airport and is Indicated thus:  trace/more



than trace.

-------
         j      PM      AMJ      JA      SO      N      D     Totals



1955   13/12  14/9   9/11   6/9    5/8    3/10   5/T   4/10   7/5   1/14  14/12  18/6  81/113  194



1956   11/9   12/11  8/14   6/12   6/17   5/8    6/11  4/13   6/7   3/4    7/10  12/15 86/131  217



1957   15/15   7/8   5/10  11/13   2/12   3/14   1/8   6/8    4/11  5/7    6/12  10/10 75/128  203



1958   17/7   17/6   8/9    5/11   5/10   5/12   5/11  2/7    2/12  6/9    7/12  18/9  97/115  212



1959    8/15   6/13  7/14   5/16   6/13   3/6    3/10  5/12   1/12  4/14   9/12   2/15 59/152  211





                                                                                   398/639 1,037



                                                              Average Yearly        79/127   207

-------
                                                        413

          A one-year storm at Detroit, Michigan, has been

determined to produce 1,20 inches of rainfall in six hours.

The following tabulation shows the number of occurrences of

rainfalls in excess of 1,0 inches for the last several years.
                                           Year
      JPMAMJJASOND   Total
1955 1
1956
1957
1958
1959
5-Yr.
Total 1
2
11 1
2
1 1
21 2
003^034


2
1
1 1
2 3
Average
1
1
1 1


3 1
Yearly
4
4
6
3
7
24
4.8
          The significance of comparing the average yearly

occurrences of rainfall "first tabulation" with the average

yearly occurrences of rainfalls in excess of I/O inches is that

the volumetric storage of a "one year storm" would reduce

the annual number of discharges of combined sewage into the

receiving waters to less than five.

               Quality of Storm Water Run-Off

                  from a Metropolitan Area

          The proponents of separate systems intimate that

the storm water run-off from an area would be a perfectly

safe material to be discharged directly to the receiving

waters.
                                                   GPO 82O8I9—S-I7

-------
                                                        414
          Studies  at  Detroit  indicate  that  this  is not the
case, at  least  for a  metropolitan area,  and that £form water
flows from a  separate system  could be  expected to be highly
polluted  but  only  in  a somewhat  lesser degree than storm
water overflows from  a combined  system.
          The Detroit data upon  which  these conclusions were
reached was obtained  by taking samples of storm  run-off from
the land  surfaces  at  point of concentration at the street
catch basins, starting as soon as run-off occurred and con-
tinued during the  course of the  storm.
          The results of the  sampling  varied quite widely
between sampling points and also  at the same sampling point
during the period  of  run-off.  In some cases the quality of
the material became worse as  the  storm progressed and in
others it became better, and  in  still  others no  pattern was
apparent.
          Due to lack of time and  opportunity, the Detroit
data is limited, but  all of the  results  support  contention
that storm water run-off from highly urbanized and highly
populated areas is heavily polluted and  would be very little
less objectionable in  the receiving waters  than  the run-off
from combined sewers.
          The following data shows the results of sampling
storm water run-off from Detroit  streets as described in
foregoing paragraph entitled  "Quality of Storm Water Run-Off

-------
                                                        415
from a Metropolitan Area."
          Due to the exceptionally dry summer In the Detroit
area, only a limited number of samples of surface run-off
could be obtained.  However, the results were as follows:
Storm of 7-13-60
                                     Vol. Solids
Sample
L-l
L-2
Storm of
C
L
Storm of
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
MPN
150,000
230,000
7-26-60
2,300
43,000
9-12-60
2,300
2,300
9,100
93,000
3,600
9,100
150,000
7,300
9,100
23,000
9,100
15,000
3,600
Sus. Solids
-
-

-
-

453
257
120
714
288
177
110
348
81
179
86
107
114
                                      210
                                       92

                                      300
                                      116
                                       96

                                      115
                                       40
                                      114

                                       90
                                       94

-------
                                                        416
 Sample      MPN       Sus.  Solids     Vol.  Solids
  1^         3,600        328            196
  15         3,600        146            107
  16         9,100        125            93
  17        93,000          98            81
  18        15,000        102            75
 Storm of 9-19-60
  1         9,100          98            34.
  2        23,000        151            62
  3       430,000          90            38
  4       230,000          71            18
NOTE:  All of the above samples  were  taken at different
       locations at different times during the progress of
       the storm.  In the  storm  of 9-12-60 each sample from
       1 to 18 was taken at  different locations, starting
       with number one at  1:15 P.m. and ending with number
       18 at 2:05 P.m.

         If, by some means,  with unlimited manpower and funds,
a separate system could truly be kept separate, Detroit
studies indicate that the pollutional load resulting from
a separate system would be comparable to that produced from
a combined system.
        Economics of Separate vs. Combined Systems
         Studies made at Detroit indicated that in an un-

-------
                                                        417



sewered area the cost of a separate system would be about



twice that of a combined system if the complete separate



system was constructed at one time.  Studies also showed



that in an area already served by a combined system, the



cost of changing over to a separate system would require an



additional expenditure of over twice the cost of the orig-



inal combined system.



         Newly developing areas should examine all economic



factors closely before they commit themselves to what is



the lesser expense initially with a separate system, but



a far more burdensome financial load later on.



         The high cost of sewers seems to support the case



for separate systems and certainly the first need of a newly



developed area is for sanitary sewers, leaving the storm



water drainage to natural water courses of the land.



         If the area remains small and residential in nature



and character, perhaps the problems experienced in a highly



urbanized area with complex land uses will never develop and



a separate system might continue to be satisfactory.



             Maintenance of Separate Systems



         In the case of a highly urbanized and complex area



certain problems develop which eliminate any advantages that



a separate system may have.



         The matter of maintaining the physical separation



of the two-sewer system is an impossible task in any major

-------
                                                        418
sewer system.
         The operational problems involved in maintaining a
separate system as a separate system have not been success-
fully solved, particularly in large and extensive systems.
Either by stealth, or Ignorance, or good intention, sanitary
connections improperly find their way into storm sewers where
the separate system is in use.  Large systems would require
policing on a major scale to discover sanitary connections
made surreptitiously into the storm sewers, and experience
at Detroit indicates that a completely  separate storm and
sanitary sewer system can never be successfully protected
from this type of misuse.
        The Effect of Volumetric Storage  on the
              Reduction  of Storm Overflows
         Combined systems can be operated to  produce results
in every way as  satisfactory as those produced by  separate
systems at far lesser construction cost.
         The volumetric  storage capacity  of  a sewer system,
if provisions are made  in the design  to adapt this feature
to the  function  of  storing  storm water, can  be of  major im-
portance  in  significantly  reducing  the  number and  duration of,
storm overflows.
          In  the  Detroit area,  theoretically, there are on
the  average  84  storms per year that  will produce run-off
to the receiving waters.  In other words, exceeding the

-------
                                                        419
capacity of the Interceptor to capture the first flush of
storm overflows.
         A one-year storm produces 1.2 inches of run-off in
six hours, or an average rate of 2/10 inch per hour, and all
storms of a one-year intensity or less account for 19 inches
of the total average annual rainfall of 31.47 inches.  De-
troit studies also show that on the average, less than five
storms per year occur that exceed a one-year intensity.
         In substantiating these statements, the precipi-
tation records of the Detroit area show the following number
of storms significantly greater than 1.2 inches for the
years indicated:  1955 - 2, 1956 - 4, 1957 - 3, 1958 - 3,
1959 - 5.
         From my own personal observations of the outlet of
a system that has less volumetric storage than required for
a one-year storm, the statistical conclusions stated above
have been verified.  Conclusions reached at Detroit and
substantiated by field data are that the designing of
"volumetric storage" into a combined system can greatly
reduce the number of storm overflows per year (from 84 to 5 or
less) and possibly without any additional cost for structures:.
                       Conclusions
         In summarizing the foregoing comments the following
appear to be the significant conclusions.
         Any properly designed and constructed combined

-------
                                                        420
sewer, without making use of the storm water storage,  will
produce results in the range of 98$ efficiency and any
expenditure of public funds to improve its operation should
not be made until necessity can be clearly shown.
         The adoption of the plan of designing storm water
storage into combined systems to the extent possible or
desirable, will increase the efficiency of any combined
system correspondingly.
         Generally speaking, the designing of storm water
storage into a combined system increases the cost very
little.  Adding this feature to an existing system would
cost more but would still not be a major expenditure.
         Separate systems will discharge to the receiving
waters with every storm exceeding 3/100 inch per  hour,  or
about 89 times each year, and the quality  of the  storm-water
discharge will be objectionable and  closely comparable  to
that  from a combined  system.
         Combined systems,  designed  to make use  of  "volumet-
rio  storage"  for the  containment  of  storm  water,  and  based
on the volume  of a  one-year storm, would discharge  to the
receiving water  only  from three to five times  each  year,
with a duration  of  about  4/1056  of total time,  which corres-
ponds to an efficiency of about 99.6$
         We believe that  the only conclusion  that can be
 reached  from  the foregoing  statements is  that  properly de-

-------
                                                        421



signed combined systems, utilizing the feature of storm



water storage, would produce results compatible with the



reasonable use of the country's water resources,



                SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION



                     TO THE REPORT ON



     STORM WATER OVERFLOWS FROM COMBINED SEWER SYSTEMS



                     DETROIT, MICHIGAN



         The following data will Indicate the extent to



which the Detroit System Is now making use of the effect of



storm water storage in controlling quality of storm water



overflows.



         The total capacity of all storm outlets in the City



of Detroit is 48,419 cubic feet per second.  Of this quantity



36,971 cubic feet per second Incorporates the feature of storm



water storage, and the balance of 11,273 cubic feet per sec-



ond only to a limited degree.



         It should be noted that in the volumetric storage



contained In the outlets indicating a total of 36,971 is one



of the largest of the numerous Detroit systems, namely the



Conner Creek system, and this system has the capacity for



storing storm water significantly greater than the quantities



involved in the so-called one-year storm.  This is a major



portion of the Detroit system and as new relief outlets are



constructed we will approach this degree of control over



the balance of Detroitfs system.

-------
                                                        422




         Previous data submitted in the report, of which



this is a supplement, as to the effect of storing a one-year



storm, indicates that of the 89 run-off-producing-storms



in a year, 84 would reach the receiving waters if the feature



of storm water storage had not been incorporated, but with



the incorporation of the storm water storage feature, the



run-offs would be reduced to about four or five per year.



                   STORM WATER QUALITY



         In a published report on the same subject dated



February 1950, which is made a part of this testimony,



some evidence was presented on the quality of  storm water



overflows indicating that on the average 4,300,000 conforms



per 100 milliliters could be expected.  However, it should




be pointed out that this number would probably be in the



range of 300,000 coliforms per 100 milliliters depending on



the intensity of the storm producing the run-off.



         It further pointed out that with storm water stor-




age the volumes of diluting storm water included in the



overflow would approximate that which might occur during




a maximum storm.



         It should be further noted that these quantities



are prior to initial dilution.  After initial  dilution has



taken place the coliform numbers would be further greatly




reduced, probably in the range of 50,000 coliform per 100



milliliters.  These same results could be deduced from the

-------
                                                        423



records at the sewage treatment plant, which indicate the



average coliform MPN of the Detroit primary tank effluent



before chlorinatlon, is about 15,000,000 per 100 milllliters.



         As a point of information, it is generally admitted



in the literature that over one billion bacteria can be



accommodated on the head of an ordinary common pin, and



the average flow in the Detroit River is approximately



50,000,000 (100 milllliters) per second.



         Although additional field data is required to vali-



date these computations, the data that is now available leadS|



us to the one conclusion that the operation of Detroit's



combined system incorporating storm water storage will pro-



duce results in the receiving waters equal to or better than



the conditions which would result from the nearly 100 storm



overflows that would occur on the average each year if the



Detroit system had been constructed as a separate system.



         (A statement presented by Mr. Palmer is as follows:)

-------
     Reprinted from SEWAGE AND INDUSTRIAL WASTES, "Vol. 22, No. 2, February, 1950
                               Printed in U. S. A.
  THE  POLLUTIONAL  EFFECTS  OF  STORM-WATER
        OVERFLOWS FROM  COMBINED  SEWERS*

                           BY CLYDE L. PALMER
              Sanitary Engineer, City Engineer's Office, Department of
                          Public WorTcs, Detroit, Mich.
            Introduction

  Within the last few years, there ha&
arisen a popular demand for the abate-
ment of stream pollution and all sani-
tarians certainly  agree with this move-
ment in principle. As is often the case,
however, the tremendous surge of an
awakened public interest may  carry
any cause far beyond justifiable limits.
The  demand is made that all pollution
must be abated without evaluating the
cost  of .the  damage that would result
by depriving individuals or municipali-
ties of the reasonable use of their water
resources.  Pollution caused by  storm
water overflows from combined  sewer
systems has been condemned and per-
haps rightly so,  but before public or
private resources are dissipated  in an
effort to eliminate entirely all stream
pollution, it might be well  to appraise
the problem both as to the possibilities
of reaching the ideal objective and the
results that can be accomplished within
practical limits.
  In the discussion of the  problem of
abating  stream pollution, little if any
distinction is made  between the  pollu-
tion caused by storm water  overflowing
from a combined sewer  system operat-
ing in conjunction with diversion works
and sewage treatment facilities and the
pollution caused by the  direct  and
continuous  discharge of sanitary sew-
age  to receiving waters.
   The case  against the direct and con-
tinuous  discharge  of sanitary sewage
   * Presented  at 24th  Annual Conference,
 Michigan Sewage Works  Association;  Tra-
 verse City, Mich.; May 23-25, 1949.
has long since been proven, and as to
the necessity for abatement, all sani-
tarians agree.  The nature, extent, and
methods of abatement of the pollution
caused by storm overflows from com-
bined sewers are  not so  well  defined
and are  the subject of this discussion.

   Characteristics  of  Low-Intensity
               Storms
   Preliminary  to the study  of the
pollutional effects  of storm-water over-
flows from combined sewers, it is neces-
sary to  investigate the characteristics
of low-intensity storms, which are obvi-
ously the most numerous, and, conse-
quently,  the most important  in this
particular study.  The accompanying
diagrams were prepared from the data
of the U. S. Weather Bureau and City
of Detroit records. Figure 1 indicates
that 90 per cent of the annual rainfall
in  the Detroit area is contributed by
storms  having an intensity of 0.50 in.
per hr.  or less, and about 50 per cent
by rainfall of  0.10 in. per hr. or less.
Figure 2 indicates that, on the average,
157 storms occur per year in amount
of a trace or more, and that about 89
storms  per year occur that are 0.03 in.
or more in amount.  Figure 3 indicates
that, on the average,  14 per cent of the
total time at least a trace  of  rain is
falling,  and 3 per cent of the time, it
is raining 0.03 in. per hr. or more.
   In studying the results of the fore-
going storm data, it is  first assumed
that the effects of rainfall will be im-
posed on a combined sewer system pro-
vided with diversion works to  pass the
sanitary flow  to  the collecting inter-
                                      154

-------
Percent Of Jftnuaf Rainfall contributed Ay precipitation of rote ffc/o/ to or leas than amount indicated




v


r
\"~-
Roinfo/l in inc
>..,*....*„.



; .
|. . .
*r

.
, 1 ;
!:

£
i j
Ui
.
-j-j— .





• ••

_ _
i*


Ml:
^
±d
;t:

1- 1 .


.':


. . i .



• • . <


n
i: !
. . ! 1
. •/•
"H H




':ii
i-i. 1 i
1 ' ;
53







, . .

.
• • i '
m
• •


[ca
!-;-!-:
U



#3.
i
!;'•

•


. , . .
i . : .
. . i
i ii
• ;

::::

1 i
; ! • •
--' v
rr" "; T




fMU
I
5.
, :

;


i .







P



1

ll

B
: : . i
• '
1
. .
n
•


- ' ' •
w/
: £













.
r ' • •
i;':
. .
1 : ' :
. '
•

til!
, • :

/6>/V
W7Z
£17?C
t2




-\ j j J
H


i

:!
:'!/
f
f
/ •
.
'


i .
: :
H

R
i;
• ' '







»


«.





*






ii


* y1

|
2
• ;







•

rr
r









1





.
,. . . ^


1
a
; ; :




•T




- '
1
ffiFf


,<
— rt
i
... L

. .

j
/
/
t




.i::
~T i IT" n


'

• ;
;
:}
li
3 5
• i
•
r
••
1 : ;
i


' '
:;

i










1 -.I
i
;,
-.
.
i


j
>
t
•

s
» .
a





















. ,

' '





j
.
' _ '

j ,









._ . .




S:
.






r./.



•':f



'-




r..vi


^*(
. . I !
: '

' i

•'•4
:: r
: j
• •-
• -e
1
; .' ::
\ i

- • ,
. j
Inches Of Annual Rainfall contributed b
-------
             WitTEitSnY'STQQ^
                                  109  ff
number- of days per year rainfall 9%ua/ffd or 9xc9«ded amount ir>dica+rd
 FIGURE 2.—Occurrence of rainfall in low intensity storms at Detroit, Mich.
o
«I

-------
TKAC
                      of total rrumbfr of flours rainfall u^uallfJ or ffxcewaW amount W/c


                 FIGURE 3.—Duration  of rainfall  in low intensity storms at Detroit, Mich.
                                                                                                                             IT)
                                                                                                                             P



                                                                                                                             rf
                                                                                                                             H
                                                                                                                             w
                                                                                                                             /'
                                                                                                                             :
•o
§

-------
Vol. 22, No. 2    STOEM OVEBFLOWS PROM COMBINED SEWERS
                                 158
ceptor system  and  to the treatment
plant.
  It is obvious that some of  the very
light  rainfalls will not even reach  the
sewers.   The limits of storm  intensity
for which  this is true had to be  de-
termined in order  to  establish  the
point at which  rainfall could affect
the sewer system.  Data on the amount
of rainfall  necessary  to  cause  runoff
were  accumulated by field observation
and measurement using portable rain
gauges.   The result of  the observations
thus made  indicated that, on the aver-
age,  runoff did not occur  unless  the
precipitation exceeded 0.03  in. per  hr.
  Inasmuch  as  the  analysis  of con-
ditions was to  be made  on the  basis
of quantity of flow in  multiples of  the
average dry-weather flow, this  quantity
was  determined  from the  records of
the sewage treatment plant at Detroit
as 162  g.p.d. per capita.  This flow
then had to be expressed as inches per
hour on the area to evaluate it in terms
equivalent  to rainfall.   For  Detroit
conditions,  with  40 people per acre
producing  an average of  162  g.c.d.,
the sanitary flow is equivalent to about
0.01 in.  per hr.
  Reasoning from the foregoing com-
putations,  the  following  conclusions
can be reached:

  1. Before storm runoff from the land
to the sewer system occurs, precipita-
tion must exceed 0.03  in. per  hr.
  2. Before storm-water overflows will
occur from  a  combined sewer sys-
tem to receiving waters, the precipita-
tion must exceed 0.03  in. per  hr. plus
whatever storm capacity  the intercep-
tion has  over and above that  required
for sanitary flow or,  in the case of
Detroit, an additional  0.01  in. per  hr.
for each multiple of the sanitary  ca-
pacity available  for  storm flow;  for
example, with an interception  capacity
of twice  the sanitary flow, storm over-
flow would  not occur  unless  the pre-
cipitation  exceeded  0.04 in.  per  hr.
(0.03 + 0.01).  With  an interception
capacity of three times  the  sanitary
flow,  the precipitation would have to
exceed  0.05 in.  per hr.  (0.03 + 0.02)
before overflow would occur, and so on.

  In  order to get some  check on the
above method of computation, a study
was made of the records of the Conner
Creek storm pumping station at  De-
troit.
  Figure 4 gives the pumping record
at that station and indicates that storm
flows  that  required pumping to  the
Detroit River occurred about 2.5  per
cent  of total time  and  at  a pump-
ing rate equivalent  to about 0.04 in.
per hr. on  the tributary area. Storms
producing  a pumping rate less than
0.04 in. per hr. could be diverted to the
interceptor system.
  From the data shown  in Figures  2
and 3 and the finding that no  runoff
will be produced by precipitation  un-
der 0.03 in. per  hr. and that the aver-
age  sanitary  flow  of  162  g.c.d. is
equivalent  to 0.01 in. per hr. of rain-
fall, computations can be made relating
interceptor  capacity  in  multiples of
average sanitary flow (162 g.c.d.) to
occurrence  of overflows per year  and
duration of overflows per year.
  Figure 5 shows the relation between
overflow occurrence  and  interceptor
capacity.  The following points  are of
note:
  1. With no storm-water diversion, 89
overflows per year might occur.  In
other  words, there are on the average
89  storms  when the precipitation is
greater than 0.03 in.
  2. With interceptor capacity 600 per
cent of the average sanitary  flow, 65
overflows per year might still occur to
the  receiving waters.
  3. An interceptor  with a  capacity
600 per cent of the sanitary flow  would
reduce the  number of overflow  occur-
rences 25 per cent.
  4. Relating the reduction of overflow
occurrences to the capacity of the in-
terceptor shows that each g.c.d. unit

-------
159
                   SEWAGE AND INDUSTEtAL WASTES
                                                            February, 1950
                                    mv


                                                                *,§
                                                                     I
                                                                     s

                                                                   11
         N
*i
                                                                   *1
                                                                     B
                                                                     c
                                                                     U
                                                                     "5

                                                                     I
                                                    '8
                                                     ;
                                                                     I
                                                                     -
                                                                     ^
                                                                     a
                                                                     -
                                            7
                 ><^/ •f-fOtf
                     a     ^     *     *     ^^
                     '^/-// i^^ -J*>Q*( ***& fALf^u/ - &6odusntf
                                                                 f §  *
                                                                     fa
                                                                     a
                                                       GPO 82O819— B-18

-------
Vol. 22, No. 2    STORM OVERFLOWS FROM COMBINED SEWERS
                                                                      160
of interceptor capacity is most effective
when the interceptor  capacity  is  150
per cent of the sanitary flow or  it may
be stated that the interceptor is most
effective in preventing overflow occur-
rence,  gallon for gallon of capacity,
when it has a capacity of 150 per cent
of the sanitary flow.
                                       Figure 6 shows the relation between
                                     overflow duration  and interceptor  ca-
                                     pacity.  The following points are of
                                     note .-
                                       1.  With  no  storm-water diversion,
                                     the duration of storm-water  overflows
                                     would  occupy  3.0  per cent  of  total
                                     time.  In other words, on the average,
r
\ti>
\


  %'«
  X
    10
  I
           Nat*
                 Afo
                 -urtoff pr,
                 r „,„
            .
                       Q(

                    REDL
                              'uctd
                              f M-
                                          /  • "«
                              ^JTBpCt
1& i—^ /I i--***
L'PTbf*

                                  9/
 IF Kl/F&ft .O.V
                               PE.ACZ.
                                         - TOK4L
                              OVE.P.FLC *v oc. 'CUR&E.M ->
/ons
of-m r-unoff ujill be
.c.d of tj/frmato cofi
                                                                     I*
                                                                     ft
                                                                     H
                                                                     i
                                                                     t k
                                                                     i« S
        ^O   TOO   I9O  3OO '  gSO ' &OO  36O  *6O  490  3OO  StO  6OO
            Interceptor a form water capacity in % of sanitary flout

FIGURE 5.—Relation of overflow occurrence and reduction to interceptor capacity as a
                            function of sanitary flow.
                                  DAL
                                            01^
                                                  de
         \CLOW5
                                               ft
    WF.RCIft
               .03 ii rchea per tn ur
fr.CUQPPfi]CE
                                                           CAPACI

-------
161
                     SEWAGE AND INDUSTRIAL WASTES
                                                                 February, 1950
precipitation in excess of 0.03 in.  per
hr. occurs  for 3.0 per  cent of total
time.
   2. With interceptor capacity 600 per
cent of the average sanitary flow, the
duration  of overflow would be reduced
to 1.0  per cent of  total time.
   3. An  interceptor  with a capacity
                        600 per cent of the sanitary flow would
                        reduce  the  duration of overflows 60
                        per cent.
                          4. Relating  the reduction  of  over-
                        flow duration  to interceptor  capacity
                        shows  that  each g.c.d.  unit  of inter-
                        ceptor capacity is most effective when
                        the interceptor capacity is 150 per cent
of
 \
  t,s

 1
        tfW

t\fa-'.i •unefi' fti-oa 'jcft/
typr* aififa ft on
   AS. LA
                         BF.EXJCTiniJOt'
                           IN
                          PPbDUtlNG-
                                            £D
IS fnefimm p v four
      tfttfat
                                TO
                                                       &'&.
                                                      PACJT
                        OF CHJRATlOfJt Of
                      \ STQAM$ PEP YE^R
                                          PUPATION
                                                                        ?C3
                                                                        tto
                                                       sa

                                                          I
         SO   tOO   ISO  ZOO' ZSO" 300  360  4OO 4SO  SOO 'SSO  6OO
                      - a form 
-------
Vol. 22, No. 2   STORM OVERFLOWS FROM COMBINED SEWERS
                                 162
of the sanitary flow (that the inter-
ceptor is most effective in reducing the
duration of overflow, gallon for gallon
of capacity, when it has a capacity of
150 per  cent of the sanitary flow).
  The foregoing  analysis of the effect
of storm-water diversion to interceptors
as a method for abatement of the pollu-
tion  resulting from  storm-water over-
flows from  a combined  sewer  system
and  summarized in Figures 5  and 6
leads to the following conclusions:

  1.  No  satisfactory reduction  in the
number of storm overflow occurrences
can  be  made by any  reasonable in-
crease in interceptor capacity.
  2.  No  satisfactory reduction  in the
duration of storm  overflows  can be
made by any  reasonable  increase in
interceptor  capacity.

Quality  of  Overflow from Combined
               Sewers
  The conclusions  reached  as  to the
effectiveness of  increasing interceptor
capacity in  reducing storm-water over-
flow occurrences and duration of over-
flows did not consider the quality of
the overflow storm  water and whether
the diversion of  a  greater  number of
the  smaller  storms  and an increased
portion of  larger storms would  accom-
plish the feat of preventing a  dispro-
portionately greater amount of pollu-
tion  from   escaping with  the  storm-
water overflow.  The conclusion reached
by some observers  that the quality of
overflow storm water from a combined
sewer shows high pollution during the
early period of  overflow,  diminishing
as the overflow continues, has not been
substantiated in the studies made at
Detroit.
  The collection of data  for Detroit
has  not  been completed to the extent
that  positive conclusions  have been
reached, and only  a limited range of
storm intensities have  been  investi-
gated.  However, the  results obtained
on a large and extensive sewerage sys-
tem appear to be  affected by  factors
not so  significant in simple  systems,
and the following conclusions have been
at least partially substantiated:
  1.  Erratic variations in  the quality
of overflow storm water are character-
istic and result from the time element
involved in arrival at the point of over-
flow of the  first flush  water from the
tributary  systems discharging to the
main trunk sewer.  This effect appears
particularly significant in an area such
as Detroit, where  the  time of concen-
tration in the larger sewer systems  is
as long as 200 min.
  2. A condition of more  or  less uni-
form quality of overflow storm water
cannot be  expected unless the storm
period substantially exceeds the time
of concentration of the sewer system
and in sufficient intensity  to maintain
high velocities.
  "3. After the storm flow has exceeded
the  capacity of the diversion to the
interceptor  of 2 to  2.5 times the dry
weather flow, the  quality of -the over-
flow water will have about the follow-
ing  characteristics: Coliform indices
 (m.p.n.),   4,300,000;   5-day   B.O.D.,
50 p.p.m.; suspended solids, 250 p.p.m. ;
and  suspended  volatile  solids,  100
p.p.m.  Plus variations of 100 per cent
and minus  variations  of 50  per cent
are to be expected.

  Prom the study of  the quality  of
overflow storm  water,  the conclusion
is reached that  no satisfactory reduc-
tion in the pollution carried by storm-
water  overflow can be accomplished by
any reasonable increase in interceptor
capacity, due to the fact that diminu-
tion of pollution  after the first flush
does not obtain and successive peaks of
pollution  arrive later  in the  progress
of the storm overflow.

       Separate Storm Sewers
   The separate system of sewerage has
been advanced  as a solution for the
problem of  abatement  of the pollu-
tional effects of storm overflows from
combined sewers.   A study of the re-

-------
163
SEWAGE AND INDTJSTBIAL WASTES
February, 1950
salts  to be expected from a separate
system brings up the questions of cost,
results in abating pollution, and oper-
ational problems inherent in separate
systems.
  In  an area where the topographical
relief is not pronounced, the construc-
tion cost of a separate system of pub-
lic  sewers is  estimated  to  be  about
twice  the cost of a combined system,
assuming  new construction  in an un-
sewered area.  In an  area sewered on
the combined system, there would be
an additional cost to individual house-
holders, over  and above the cost of the
public collecting system, amounting to
at least $500 each.  For example, De-
troit's combined sewer system to date
has cost $100,000,000.   If it were to
be changed to  a separate system,  an
additional $100,000,000 of public funds
would have to  be  expended for  sani-
tary  sewers  and appurtenances.   In
addition, the 270,000 households now
connected  to the  combined  system
would have to separate their sanitary
plumbing from their  storm plumbing
at an estimated cost of $500 each or
a total of $135,000,000.
  With expenditures of this magnitude
indicated,  overwhelming  justification
must  be presented  in  support  of the
benefits to be accomplished by a sepa-
rate system.
  In  studies  made  at Detroit  to de-
termine the quality of storm water that
could be expected from a separate sys-
tem,  samples of storm-water  runoff
from  the  land  surface were collected
at points  of  concentration near catch
basin inlets and analyzed.  Although
the study has not been completed and
the number of samples taken and the
types of areas studied are limited, it
appears that the  storm runoff from
the land surface is polluted to the ex-
tent that  the storm-water flows from
a separate storm sewer  could be ex-
pected to be very unsatisfactory under
the same standards by which the qual-
ity of storm  overflows from combined
sewers are judged.
                     The first samples analyzed indicated
                   such high coliform indices that doubt
                   was  cast on the type  of  organisms
                   found,  and,  subsequently,  Tryptose
                   broth was used and B.O.D. determina-
                   tions made on  the samples to give bet-
                   ter  confirmation of  the results.   The
                   results of a sampling taken at a  catch
                   basin in  the business district of De-
                   troit during a rain  storm  on March
                   22, 1949,  are as follows:
Sample
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Time
(A.M.)
8:55
9:05
9:15
9:30
9:45
10:00
11:25
11:32
M.P.N.
930.000
430,000
430,000
930,000
430,000
230,000
43,000
25,000
Total
Solids
(p.p.m.)
660
715
726
462
914
430
714
310
Vol.
Solids
(p.p.m.)
2M
331
340
194
414
202
370
136
5-Day
B.O.D.
(p.p.m.)
234
—
124
—
132
—
96
	
                     Although the data collected to date
                   may not be conclusive, the evidence in-
                   dicates that more exhaustive investiga-
                   tion must be  made before huge ex-
                   penditures for separate sewer systems
                   can be recommended.
                     The  operational  problems involved
                   in maintaining a separate system as a
                   separate system have not  been success-
                   fully solved, particularly  in large and
                   extensive systems.   Either by stealth,
                   or  ignorance, or good  intention,  sani-
                   tary connections improperly find  their
                   way into storm sewers where the  sepa-
                   rate system is in  use.  Large systems
                   would require policing on  a major scale
                   to discover sanitary connections made
                   surreptitiously into the storm sewers,
                   and experience at Detroit  indicates
                   that a  completely  separate storm and
                   sanitary  sewer  system can never  be
                   successfully protected from this type of
                   misuse.
                     From a study of the results to be ex-
                   pected  from  the use of separate  storm
                   sewers, it is concluded that:

                     1. The cost of a separate system  is
                   prohibitive  and   not  commensurate

-------
Vol. 22, No. 2    STOEM OVERFLOWS FROM COMBINED SEWERS
                                 164
with the  results possible  to achieve.
  2. The  quality of  the  storm water
from a separate storm sewer serving an
area such as Detroit would be very un-
satisfactory and highly polluted.
  3. Separate storm  sewers are prac-
tically impossible to  maintain as  such
without some sanitary flow being  in-
cluded.

      Storm-Water Treatment
  The  treatment of the overflow storm
water  from a combined sewer  system
has been advocated as a solution of the
problem of pollution  from this  source.
The results as to quality of the storm
water after treatment that could be  ex-
pected from  this solution of the prob-
lem obviously would be those that could
be determined in advance by design.
  The results as to total over-all bene-
fits would be effective for about 2 per
cent of  total time.  In  other  words,
any facility  provided or expenditures
made would be useful and a benefit  for
the duration of the  pollutional effect
only which would be for about 2 per
cent of total time, during  which time
about  1  per  cent of  the sanitary flow
escapes to the receiving waters.
  Studies made  at Detroit indicate that
to prevent the 1 per cent of pollution
entering  the Detroit River  from  the
combined sewer system would  require
storm-water  treatment structures esti-
mated  to cost  about  $2,000,000 per
1,000 c.f.s. of treatment capacity, and
an  annual operating and maintenance
cost of $60,000 per 1,000 c.f.s. of treat-
ment capacity.
  In addition  to  the high  cost,  the
method  has  another  undesirable  fea-
ture in  the  multiplicity of treatment
installations  that would be  required.
Detroit has about 50  storm-water  over-
flow outlets along the highly developed
Detroit River waterfront, with a total
capacity  of  about 50,000  c.f.s.   The
construction of storm-water treatment
plants  in these areas  would be  diffi-
cult, expensive,  and objectionable.   Al-
though   no   conclusions   have  been
reached,  the following comparison can
be made  relative to storm-water treat-
ment as  a means of abating pollution
resulting from storm overflows from a
combined sewer system:
  1. Satisfactory  quality  standards
can be met as a matter  of  proper de-
sign and operation of the storm-water
treatment facilities provided.
  2. It appears to be the least expen-
sive of any of the  solutions presently
available.
  3. The main objectionable feature of
this method is the multiplicity of treat-
ment plants required, and this problem
remains to be  solved.

            Conclusions
  The pollutional effects of storm water
overflowing from a  properly  designed
combined sewer'system with diversion
and regulation to an interceptor and
sewage  treatment system result from
storm overflows that  in  themselves
occur only about 2 per cent of  total
time, during  which time about 1  per
cent of the total sanitary sewage of the
drainage  area escapes into  the  receiv-
ing  waters.   It should be  noted  that
during the 2 per cent of total time that
overflow  is occurring not  all of  the
sanitary flow  is escaping.
  The dilutional effect  of  the  storm-
water vehicle  carrying the  sanitary
sewage to its  escape into the receiving
waters has been shown to be  insuffi-
cient to reduce the pollution to accept-
able- standards.  The  dilutional effect
of the receiving waters in  some  cases
may  be   sufficient  to prevent serious
local nuisance: however, the  effective-
ness  of this process  of  purification is
limited  to those  conditions  where  a
long time factor intervenes between the
point of overflow and the affected area
when such uses of the receiving waters
as  water supply or recreation are in-
volved.  The   effect of  increasing the
amount  of diversion to  interceptors is
clearly shown by this study  to be in-
significant within the range of reason-
able post and  practical size structures.

-------
165
SEWAGE AND INDUSTRIAL WASTES
February, 1950
  It appears from this  study of the
problem  that properly designed regu-
lation  and  diversion of  a  combined
sewer system will be about 99 per cent
effective  in preventing  pollution  re-
sulting from the use of this type of
sewerage system.  The use of a sepa-
rate sewer system may be effective in
small systems and suburban areas, but
the results of this study indicate that
for extensive systems and densely popu-
lated areas the cost of a separate  sys-
                   tem is prohibitive and the results to be
                   expected from  such a system are  en-
                   tirely unsatisfactory.
                     It is the conclusion of this study that
                   where   conditions  are  critical  and
                   greater  protection from pollution than
                   that accomplished by proper diversion
                   of sanitary flow is warranted, the most
                   effective method  appears to be storm
                   water treatment at the individual out-
                   lets or  at  a common outlet for several
                   adjacent systems.

-------
                                                        424

         Thank you, Mr. Chairman.

         THE CHAIRMAN:  Dr. Heustis.

         DR. HEUSTIS:  Mr. Gerald Remus, of the Detroit

Water Board.  Mr. Remus, your statement is a part of the

written record, and unless you so desire, the remarks

you make now will not be part of the written record, but

it is subject to whatever you wish.

         STATEMENT OP GERALD J. REMUS, GENERAL MANAGER,

         BOARD OF WATER COMMISSIONERS, CITY OF DETROIT,

         WATER BOARD BUILDING, 735 RANDOLPH ST.,

         DETROIT 26, MICHIGAN

         MR. REMUS:  I have two parts that I would like to

review, part of which I would like in the written record and

part of which will be just a brief review of my report.

         DR. HEUSTIS:  Will you indicate to the reporter the

parts you would like in the re-  -d?

         MR. REMUS:  Yer   «r

                      -.ri OF rETRorr

              Board of Water Commissioners

          Water Board Bldg. — 735 Randolph St.
Gerald R. Remus
General Manager   Detroit 26, Michigan
                                           March 26, 1962
United States Public Health Service
and
Michigan Water Resources Commission

Gentlemen:

-------
                                                        425



         Herewith presented Is a report on sewage and Indus-



trial waste  treatment for the metropolitan Detroit area.



The report establishes that:



         (l)  Detroit built a metropolitan sewage plant,



              put it in service in 1941, and by 1957 had



              invested $38,414,000, all without the



              necessity of any "court action".



         (2)  Detroit re-dedicated Itself in 1957 toward



              further expanding its treatment system so



              that 4,000,000 people could be served in the



              metropolitan area.   At that time, it adopted



              an additional plant  improvement program



              costing $33,000,000, which is now underway.



              This, coupled with  the work authorized by



              adjacent communities, makes a sum total of



              approximately $104,000,000 of sewage system



              construction now working.



         (3)  Detroit has  a storm water and sewage collection



              system costing  approximately $350,000,000,



              with at least another $90,000,000 planned.



              The system storage  capacity is such that a



              considerable amount  of storm flow is treated.



         (4)  After an areawide "one system" water supply



              had been developed,  it followed that we



              wished to develop a  "one-system"  sewage and

-------
                                                        426



              drainage system.  To date the area sewage



              system has been substantially constructed



              along these same lines.  A program is under



              development sponsored by "business" and



              "government" so that a proper engineering



              system will continue to develop for the



              six-county area.




         (5)  The Detroit River has been gradually im-



              proving, and this improvement will be accel-



              erated when the impact of $104,000,000 of



              construction becomes a reality.  The Rouge



              River will show the greatest betterment in



              the next three months when all raw sewage



              will be removed.




         Detroit's treatment standards have been ahead of



the metropolitan area, and in accepting the extra area load



for treatment, we hope to help in improvements all around.



Canada should also be encouraged to add to the general im-



provement factor.  The area communities have responded di-



rectly to their ability to "finance".  Business and local



government have indicated their desire to proceed in an



orderly, businesslike way.





         You, therefore, must judge.  Do we continue in



the program underway which will cooperatively develop a



program for six counties on drainage, on sewage treatment

-------
                                                        42?



standards, on sewage col-lection systems, on centralized



administration and financing, and which will plan for



systematic future development — OR, does the U.  S.  Public



Health Service Enforcement Bureau now start studies  and



when they have reachedconclusions, will we find  ourselves



in the position whereby our opportunity to put an overall



system into action will have disappeared?  Two simultaneous



studies cannot be Justified.  Therefore, the answer  is



obvious — put your stamp of approval on the present pro-




gramming .



                             Respectfully submitted,



                             /s/  G. Remus



                                  General Manager




         (The report is as follows:)





          DETROIT'S METROPOLITAN SEWAGE SYSTEM
               By:   G.  Remus,  General Manager



                     Department of Water Supply



                     735 Randolph Street



                     Detroit 26, Michigan







                        March 22, 1962

-------
                                                        428



          DETROIT«S METROPOLITAN SEWAGE SYSTEM



         Major developments 01 che Detroit sewage system have



been and are being made, and future plans are now underway.



The Sewage Treatment Plant went Into service In 1940 and



the cost, up to 1957, was $38,414,000.  In 1957 Detroit



re-dedicated itself toward doing more of the area sewage



treatment job.  At that time, 35 suburban communities besides



Detroit had their sewage treated at this plant, or approx-



imately 2,600,000 people.  The 1957 program provided for a



$33,000,000 plant expansion.  Approximately $7,700,000 of this



construction has  been completed.  Today 52 suburban commu.



itties and Detroit are under  long-term contract for this



treatment facility.  Approximately 3,100,000 people live



in the area now under contract in three counties.



         All original construction and all programs committed



to at this time have met the health  standards  of the state



and  local agencies.  In 1961, the Lower  Rouge communities



signed contracts  which  provided  for  sewer  interceptor con-



struction, and the  treatment will be provided  at Detroit's



plant.  This  section of work cost approximately $18,000,000.



At this  same  time,  the  capacity  of the Northeast Interceptor,



with connections  to Detroit,  is  being  increased.



          In March of  1962,  contracts were  signed so that



twelve  additional communities  in southwest Wayne County



would start  construction for sewage  facilities, costing

-------
                                                        429



 approximately $18,000,000.  The Wayne County Sewage Treatment



 Plant at Wyandotte will be Improved.  Additional areas in



 Wayne, Hacomb and Oakland Counties are negotiating for ser-



 vice with the Detroit system.



         While sewage treatment facilities have been and are



 developing, a storm water handling system developed within



 Detroit costing approximately $350,000,000.  The size of



 these facilities are such that all small storms are now



 treated.



         A great deal of work is completed or nearlng com-



 pletion on sewage treatment.  We are also underway for an



 "area-wide" sewage and drainage system.  The Detroit system



 is an area-wide operation now serving sections of three



 counties, with commitments to 52 communities, and with pro-



 gramming substantially complete for the area to serve more



 than 4,000,000 people by 1980.  However, both drainage and



 sewage structures built now must serve far beyond this period



 of time.  Therefore,  it is essential that the entire six-



 county drainage area have a "master program" extending to



 at least the year 2000.



         This "master program" development Is underway.  A



 committee of business, local, state and federal officials is



 active to guide this study.  Sub-committees have been appointed;



preliminary engineering studies have been made; the area has



been aerially photographed; consulting engineers have been

-------
                                                        430



selected; and approximately $260,000 of the $305,000 needed



has been pledged by business, local and federal government.



The programming project was requested by the Six-County



Committee and sponsored by the National Sanitation Council.



This study Is progressing as expeditiously as possible



without handicapping the Immediate contractual developments



of West Wayne County.



         The work completed has made the Detroit River the



cleanest of any comparable one anywhere.  Records will show



that fresh water fish are found throughout its entire length.



The work now under construction or completed, totaling



$104,000,000, will further Improve river conditions.  Ex-



istent operating statistics do not yet reflect this Improve-



ment.  Both the Detroit Water Department and the Inter-



national Joint Commission records show that the river is



gradually Improving, and most certainly this will continue.



         It should be noted that metropolitan Detroit Is



developing its sewage facilities progressively without much



development on the Canadian shore.  It should also be noted



that many who criticize standards of Detroit are only point-



ing their finger to other areas so that their immediate



home problem does not come under surveillance.  Also,many



refer to Detroit In the metropolitan concept and therefore



the sub-standard conditions they refer to may be as far away



as Wyandotte or Estral Beach.  Some minor evidence also ex-

-------
                                                        431
 Ists to the effect that developers of a various nature, or
 chemical salesmen, may be doing some agitation.
         The operating policy of the Detroit system is:
         (l)  To raise the entire area to the standard of
              treatment exercised in Detroit and then grad-
              ually Improve the area treatment standards.
         (2)  To operate the Detroit Sewage Plant so that
              the plant effluent will always be disinfected
              better than the "upstream" river flow.
         (3)  That Detroit will continue to serve "sewage
              treatment" to additional areas, and that ser-
              vice will be provided at cost.
         (4)  That construction planned for the immediate
              future, which will show marked improvement,
              will be completed within the year.
         (5)  That a "master program" is under development
              for the area which will specify the type of
              sewerage system standards of treatment.
         (6)  That co-ordinated drainage facilities will be
              engineered and a "one system" utility will
              be planned for.
        The orderly and rapid developments in the area
should  not  be interfered with by additional studies or
overlapping endeavors, lest confusion create a situation
whereby the normal development will be set back many years.

-------
                                                        432

         Service for the suburban communities is provided

by contracts mutually agreed upon between Detroit and the

respective suburb.  Agreement is reached in an orderly way

for "sewage treatment".  All financing is done largely by

"revenue bonds".  Most communities have extended themselves

to the limit to pay for the facilities they must construct

and also to pay for "sewage treatment".  Any change of

treatment standards at this time would be extremely unwise

and would cause financial trouble.  Some communities could

not pay their bills, others would have their bond issues

Jeopardized because the supporting financial data would be

In error, and threats of legal action by others would tie

up all related bond issues — thereby really interrupting

the momentum of the develoment now underway.

         The sewerage problem for the area is complex.

Further sections of this report elaborate on the factors

already mentioned, and we "invite" your review of this

report and will supplement any portion on which you may

need additional information.  The remaining sections of the

report are for the purpose of supporting all of the pre-

ceding statements.

                             Respectfully submitted,
                             /s/ G. Remus
                                 General Manager

-------
                   TABLE  OF  CONTENTS




SECTION                                              PAGE



   1    Detroit's  Initial  Sewage  Disposal System,      ^37



          Xg40 - 1957 Cost, Type  of Treatment,



          Population Served in City and  35 suburbs



          Exhibit  1.1   —  Area Served



          Exhibit  1.2   —  Sewage Treatment Plant



                          Layout



   2    Detroit's  Sewage Disposal System, 1957         ^38



          to  Present.   Additions  and Improvements,



          Detroit, Suburban Expenditures, Population



          Served Including 52 Suburbs



          Enlargement and  Improvement Program to 1980



          Exhibit  2.1   —  Area Served,  1962



          Exhibit  2.2   —  Sewage Treatment Plant



          Exhibit  2.3   —  Additions to  System



          Exhibit  2.4   —  Enlargement and Improvement



                          Program




   3    Storm Flows



          One Year Storms  Treated, Treatment Capacity,



          Cost of  Storm Water Facilities in Detroit



          and Suburbs,  Statement  on Storm Flows
                                                  GPO 820819-B-I9

-------
                                                        434



                  TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contd.)



SECTION                                                PAGE



  4     Present Developments                           441



          A.  Status of Detroit River Today



              Detroit Department of Water Supply



              I.J.C. Detroit River and Rouge River



              Sampling Data



              Validity of Surface Sampling Questioned



              Fish in Detroit River and Lake Erie



          Exhibit 4.1  — Bacteriological Data,



                          Rouge River, Eight Mile



                          Road to Detroit River



          Exhibit 4.1A — Bacteriological Data, Lower



                          Detroit River to Lake Erie



          Exhibit 4.2  -  Department of Water Supply



                          River Sampling Data to



                          Trenton Channel



          Exhibit 4.3  — Rouge River Sampling Data,



                          Department of Water Supply



                          and I.J.C.



          Exhibit 4.4  — Detroit News Report, March 3,



                          1962 Record Catches of Perch



                          In W. Lake Erie



          Exhibit 4.5  ~ I.J.C. Data for Detroit River



          Exhibit 4.6  — Aerial Photo, Junction of



                          Rouge and Detroit Rivers

-------
                                                       435



                 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contd.)



SECTION                                                PAGE



  4     Present Developments  (Contd.)                    441



          B.  Excerpts from Michigan Department of



             Health and Michigan Water Resources



             Commission Report  - "Some Significant



             Accomplishments and Trends  in Pollution



             Control in the  Greater Detroit Metro-



             politan Area" - January 8,  1962



          C.  Michigan Department of Health Approval



             of Detroit Sewage  Disposal  System,



             Enlargement and Improvement  Program,



             July 27, 1957



          Exhibit 4.7 - Minutes  of Meetings with and



                       Letter from Michigan Department



                       of Health



          D.  Facilities Under Construction in the



             Area to Abate Pollution



          Exhibit 4.8  - List and Costs of Facilities



          Exhibit 4.9  - Rouge Valley Sewage Disposal  System



          Exhibit 4.10 - Down River Sewage Disposal System



          Exhibit 4.11 - Northeast Interceptor District



          E. Dequindre Interceptor to Detroit and Twelve Towns



            Drains



            Cost of Facilities

-------
                                                      436
                TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contd.)
                                                     PAGE
 5.     Future  Developments
         A.  Detroit  can  Legally  Build  Interceptors
            Outside
         B.  Water Main Construction Precedent
         C.  National Sanitation  Foundation -
            Sanitation Council for Southeastern
            Michigan, Six County Sewerage and
            Drainage Study History, Water Study
            Completed, Sewerage  and Drainage Study,
            Budget,  Engineering  Consultants, Scope
            of Job,  Including Cost Estimates
        Exhibit 5.1  - Financial  Support, Six -County
            Sewerage and  Drainage Study
        Exhibit 5.2  - List of Industrial Contributors
        Exhibit 5.3  - U.S. Public Health Service Grant
6     United States  Public Health Service Study vs.
      National Sanitation Foundation - Sanitation
      Council for Southeastern Michigan Study
        Reasons for  Preference of Sanitation Council Study
        Study Underway,  More Inclusive, More Constructive,
        Two Studies Not  Realistic,  Technical Standards
        Should not  be Changed, Canadian Situation

-------
                                                        437

                                         SECTION 1

             DETROIT'S INITIAL SEWAGE SYSTEM
             	1940 - 1957	

A.  The Detroit Sewage Disposal System was plaoed in

    service in 1940.

B.  Map of Area Served in 1957 — See Exhibit 1.1 (Attached)

C.  Sewage Treatment Plant Layout in

                          1957 — See Exhibit 1.2 (Attached)

D.  Total Cost of Plant, Interceptors, Regulators

    and Sanitary Pumping Stations in 1940    —   $27,379,000

E.  To July, 1957* Additions and Improvements

    to the Above                             —   $11,035*000

                                        Total:    $38,414,000

F.  Primary Sedimentation - Chlorination of Plant

    Effluent Eighty-five percent of the set tie able

    solids are removed and incinerated*

G.  2,605,000 people served - This Includes 660,000

    in 35 adjacent communities
        (The Exhibits to Section 1 are  as follows:)

-------
                                       Sterling T»p
                                     ?S E OAKLAND
                                       DISTRICT
West Bloomfield
    T.p
                                      LAKE SHORE
             SOUTHFIELD1- Hf
VOLE ROUGE
  DISTRICT
                DEARBORN
                                       - DEVROIT 5EWAGE
                                    7  TREATMENT PLANT
                                           DETROIT   ME-TROPOHTAN
                                    SEWAGE  TREATMENT SERVICE  AREA
                                                 UP  TO  1957
                                            Exhibit 1.1
                                                                  f.LK  7-/1-U

-------


                                  ^i . ftntm rton»ir I
                v~~,
SEWAGE  TREATMENT PLANT
          " ,-  ...
-------
                                           Exhibit 2.4
  DETROIT SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
ENLARGEMENT AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
              JULY 22,  1957

-------
                   DETROIT  SEWAGE DISPOSAL  SYSTEM
               ENLARGEMENT AND  IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The Sewage Treatment Plant and the sewerage interceptor system now require additions
and improvements to provide:

    (a)  Proper facilities to handle the continually increasing sewage and ground
        garbage load.

    (b)  Proper facilities to control the excessive fly ash now being discharged
        into the atmosphere. The City is under notice that it is violating the
        law on this matter.

    (c)  Improved treatment methods.  As the plant is called upon to handle more
        and more solids, better methods of treatment are needed to remove a
        greater percentage of solids from the sewage,  thus lessening the amount
        going to the river.

    (d)  Added reliability and proper capacity to the interceptor system.  Work
        has been deterred  on this item tor some time due to lack of funds.

At the same time these steps are oeing taken,  it is recommended that certain additional
areas be connected to the system,  namely:  Dearborn, West Wayne County, and
Southeastern Oakland County (Shown on Exhibit 1, Appendix - Proposed Service Area
Map).  This area addition will broaden the revenue base and make greater use of the
plant's designed capacities.

Historical

The Detroit Sewage disposal system was placed in service in 1940, and the total cost
was $27, 379,000 including plant and interceptor.  Up to 1956 additions and improve-
ments were added costing about $4,000,000.  In 1956 further improvements were made
costing $6, 500,000.  The present indebtedness amounts to $7, 220,000 in the form of
revenue bonds.

The sewage disposal system serves Detroit and 34 adjacent communities.  Exhibit 2,
Appendix,  identifies the communities that are now served.  A total of 2,667,000 people
are now being served; 1,909,000 of these are in Detroit and 758,000 in the suburbs.

Garbage

The ground garbage load is heavy and increasing continuously because of the expanding
use of domestic and commercial garbage grinders.

Some suburban areas have practically 100 per cent domestic garbage ground disposal
service and the use of these units in Detroit is  increasing rapidly.

The original design oi? the Sewage Treatment Plant did not provide Tor garbage disposal.
This program provides the service of domestic and commercial ground garbage disposal
for all the area. Curves shown on Exhibit 3, Appendix, illustrate the importance of the
pertinent factors involved,  such as sewage flow, sewage  solids and garbage, and what
effect the  years will have.              _   _

-------
Fly Ash

The Board of Water Commissioners are and have been under notice for some time that
the present operations of the Sewage Treatment Plant are in violation of the law because
excessive fly ash is ejected to the atmosphere as the result of our sewage solids burn-
ing operations at 9300 West Jefferson.  Fly ash is spread throughout the neighborhood
resulting in many complaints. Improved combustion equipment with proper appurte-
nances must be constructed to correct this condition.

Improved Treatment

The sewage treatment load has gradually increased. The increase is now accelerated
for a variety of reasons.  Principal factors are addition of ground garbage, increased
per capita use of water and more industrial wastes.  This means the transportation of
more and more tons of waste through the sewerage system to the treatment plant.  An
improved treatment method must be considered, under any conditions,  to reduce the
tonnage of wastes discharged to the Detroit River.  Chemical precipitation is the
method most compatible with a comparatively moderate capital expenditure, but it
entails a much higher operating cost.

Schedule

To properly handle the sewage-garbage load, additional settling basins, filters,
incinerators,  treatment facilities, and interceptor improvements,  with appropriate
housing enclosures, have to be constructed.

A schedule of construction with estimated costs,by years, follows:

   1958-61

       Plant Additions
           Four more sedimentation tanks.
           Enlarged effluent collecting channel.
           Overflow channel to Rouge River.
           Second filter building.
           Ten more vacuum filters.
           Building for incinerating kiln.
           One incinerating kiln.
           Fly ash collecting equipment for this kiln.

       Interceptor Additions and Improvements

           Second siphon at Fort and Bayside.
           Evergreen section of west interceptor - Ford Road to Warren.
           Regulator and diversion works at West McNichols and Rouge River.
           Control gates or Conner Creek outlet.
           Alteration of Conner Creek intake well as a sanitary pumping station.

                                                     Total -$20,000,000.

                                     -2 -

-------
1961-65

   Plant Additions

    Second filter building.
    Six more vacuum filters.
    Second incinerating kiln.
    Fly ash collecting equipment for this kiln.

   Interceptor Additions

    Additional regulation and diversion works on master plan -
    relief outlet.
                                                       Total - $ 5,767,000.

1965-75

   Plant Additions
    Three more sedimentation tanks.
    Four more vacuum filters.
    Set up dismantled incinerator.
    Install improved treatment process. (Estimate based on chemical
                                        precipitation process.)
   Interceptor Additions

    Additional regulation and diversion works on master plan -
    relief outlets.
                                                       Total - $ 7,027,000.

                                                 Grand Total - $32,794,000.

Construction costs based on E.N.R. index of 808 for Detroit.

Recommendations are:

That the above schedule be adopted and that we be authorized at this time to spend
$20,000,000, and that money be spent as required to carry out the program as
scheduled. Three million dollars have accumulated towards this program.  The
remaining seventeen million dollars will be financed by the issuance of revenue
bonds, to be issued as needed.

Increased operating costs and debt service result because  of the improvement to
provide better service.   Many localities are already receiving considerable garbage
disposal service, which is not included in the present sewage rate. To provide for
this extra service and to adjust tor these inequalities, a rate adjustment is recom-
mended of 10 cents per  1000 cubic feet on the basis of water used.

                                      -3-

-------
 The program is designed to provide Sewage Treatment facilities for 4 million people
 by 1980; approximately 2 million in Detroit and 2 million in the adjacent suburban
 areas.

 The average Detroit family uses approximately 3000 cubic feet of water every three
 months; therefore,  the proposed increase of 10 cents per  1000 cubic feet would add
 30 cents to that family's quarterly water bill.

 Present Rate—Total Water and Sewage—Per  iOOO cu. ft.
                                                   Suburban*     Suburban*
                                      Detroit*   Municipalities   Individual
 First      10.000 cu.ft. per month       $1.05       $1.19^         $1.23
 Next       90,000 cu.ft. per month         .87        1.00£          1.04
 All over  100,000 cu.ft. per month         .75         .87^           .91
Proposed Rate--Total Water and Sewage--Per 1000 cu. ft.

First      10.000 cu.ft. per month       $1.15        $1.29£         $1.33
Next       90,000 cu.ft. per month         .97         1.10-J          1.14
All over  100,000 cu.ft. per month         .85          .97 5          1.01

                       *Plus service charge.


Exhibit 4 shows the general plan of additions as they will be made at the Sewage
Treatment Plant and how the improvements will cover the area now owned by the
Department.
G. Remus/J
7-22-57
                                 -4-

-------
                              AR MING TON DISTRICT^

                                   EVERGREEN pISTR ICJ_

                                          S.E.OAKLAND DISTRICT
                                                        LAKE_SHOFIE_
                                                       f~~ DISTRICT"
 MIDDLE -
 ROUGE
DISTRICT

 LOWER
 ROUGE
DISTRICT
                                         v - OAKWOO'J DISTRICT
                                                27.500
                                                I4C.F.S
                      PROPOSED SERVICE AREA
           DETROIT SEWAGE  TREATMENT PLANT
                       I960  POPULATION 4,084,000
                                                                  1956
                                                           Re*•*«** 4 17•£••/
                                                           EXHIBIT  I

-------

        PRESENT  SERVICE AREA
DETROIT SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT
         1957 POPULATION 2,605,000
                                         EXHIBIT 2

-------
'CITY OF DETROIT          DEPARTMENT  OF WATER SUPPLY     DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
 SEWAGE TREATMENT  PLANT- ENLARGEMENT PROGRAM
     POPULATION SERVED
     PAST, PRESENT  AND  ESTIMATED  FUTURE          SHEET NO.    I OF 5
COMPUTED BY  V.ANDERSON   DRAWN BY  M.S.Y              DATE JUNE 7, f957
 00
 z
 o
 z
 D
 CL
 o
 CL
NORTHWEST
INTERCEPTOR
CONNECTED TO
SEWAGE PLANT
                            TOTAL POPULATION TO BE SERVED
                            IF AREAS PROPOSED BY THE DPW
                            ARE ADDED IN 1959
         TOTAL POPULATION
         SERVED BY THE
         SEWAGE PLANT
                                         •TOTAL POPULATION TO BE SERVED
                                         IF NO MORE AREA IS ADDED AFTER
                                         19S6 INCLUDES DETROIT AMD 34
                                         SUBURBS
            •SEWAGE PLANT
             PLACED IN
             OPERATION
             FEBRUARY 1940
H
-DETROIT POP
1

*\

ULATION CU
\
^\
RVE~\



"^ 	 NOT ALL OF Dt
                            • DE TROIT POPULA TION
                            SERVED BY THE
                            SEWAGE PLANT
                                           POPULATION WAS SERVED
                                           BY THE SEWAGE PLANT
                                           UNTIL 1955
      1940
   1945    1950    1955
 I960
YEARS
1965
1970
1975    I960
                                                                EXHIBIT  3A

-------
CITY OF DETROIT
                       DEPARTMENT OF  WATER  SUPPLY
                                                          DIVISION OF ENGINEER/NO
  SEWAGE  TREATMENT PLANT - ENLARGEMENT PROGRAM
     SEWAGE  PUMPAGE
     PAST, PRESENT AND ESTIMATED FUTURE          SHEET NO   2 OF 5
COMPUTED BY   V.ANDERSON   DRAWN BY  M.S.Y.              0/«7-£jUNE  7,1957
I
cr
LLJ
CL
eo
z
   900
   800
   TOO
<  600
=!
 i
UJ
=!  500
   400
Q.
UJ
O  300
CO
g  200
<
tt
UJ

   100
                                     AVERAGE SEWAGE PUMPAGE
                                     IF AREAS PROPOSED BY THE
                                     DP.W.ARE ADDED IN 1959
         NORTHWEST INTERCEPTOR
         CONNECTED  TO
         SEWAGE PL A NT -
           AVERAGE SEWAGE
           PUMPAGE
           (FROM ANNUAL
           REPORTS)
-AVERAGE SEWAGE PUMPAGE
IF NO MORE AREAS ARE ADDED.
AFTER 1956 - INCLUDES
DETROIT AND 34 SUBURBS
^^qriA
'^£r*&^~"^

/ '-SEWAGE PUMPAGE FOR
MOST OF DETROIT UP
TO 1955









^-AVERAGE SEWAGE PUMPAGE
FOR DETROIT ONLY
"^ALL OF DETROIT SEWAGE
CAME TO THE SEWAGE PLANT
AFTER 1955


















— 1


     1940     1945    1950    1955     I960    1965     1970    1975    I960
                                      YEARS
                                                               EXHIBIT  3B
    GFO ez:e<3—s-i;

-------
 CITY OF DETRO/T          DEPARTMENT OF  WATER SUPPLY     DIVISION OF ENGINEERING

  SEWAGE  TREATMENT PLANT - ENLARGEMENT PROGRAM
     SUSPENDED  SOLIDS  REMOVED IN SEDIMENTATION TANKS
     PAST, PRESENT AND ESTIMATED FUTURE           SHEEJ NO   3 OF 5

 COMPUTED BY   V ANDERSON    DRAWN BY   M.S.Y.              DATE JUNE 10,1957
   800
o
to
2   700
Q
z
UJ
I   600
If)
<
CD
cr
Q
or
UJ
   500
   400
Q
DC
LLJ
°-  300
in
w  200
    100
                    ASSUMING SOU SUSPENDED
                    SOLIDS RECOVERY FROM 1957
                    TO 1962 SAME LINE INDICATES
                    SOLIDS GOING TO RIVER-
                                            SUSP**' ED SOLIDS
                                            RECOVERED FROM
                                            ENLARGED AREA
       B
                                                   — DETROIT SOLIDS
          SUSPENDED SOL/DS
          RECOVERED
          (FROM ANNUAL
           REPORTS)
                                                             SUSPENDED SOL/DS
                                                             TO RIVER FROM
                                                             ENLARGED AREA
                              GARBAGE ADDED
                                                            ^-SUSPENDED SOLIDS
                                                              TO RIVER FROM
                                                              PRESENT AREA
                                                                  SUSPENDED
                                                            SOL/DS RECOVERED
                                                            FROM PRESENT AREA
   CHEMICAL PRECIPITA 7ION PROCESS
   STARTING IN 1963 WILL INCREASE
   SOL/DS RECOVERY TO 80% AND
   DECREASE SOLIDS GOING TO
   RIVER _
      1940
               1945    1950     1955
 I960
YEARS
1965
1970    1975    I960
                                                                EXHIBIT 3C

-------
CITY OF DETROIT          DEPARTMENT OF  WATER SUPPLY      DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT - ENLARGEMENT PROGRAM
     SOLIDS INCINERATED
     PAST,  PRESENT AND  ESTIMATED  FUTURE          SHEET NO   4 OF 5
COMPUTED BY  V.ANDERSON    DRAWN BY  M.S.Y.              DATE JUNE 7,1957
   900
                                              SEWAGE SOLIDS
                                              PLUS GARBAGE
                                              SOLIDS FROM
                                              ENLARGED AREA
                                                                          SEWAGE
                                                                       SOLIDS PLUS
                                                                    GARBAGE SOLIDSj
                                                                    (PRESENT
                                                                     AREA)
                                                             CHEMICAL
                                                             PRECIPITATION
                                                          ''I  PROCESS ADDED
SEWAGE AND GARBAGE SOLIDS
INCREASE TO BE EXPECTED IF
AREAS PROPOSED BY THE DPW
ARE ADDED  IN 1959
                                                                    SEWAGE SOL/OS
                                                                  FROM ENLARGED
                                                                  AREA J	'X
                                                      SEWAGE SOLIDS
                                                      (PRESENT AREA)
                     SEWAGE SOLIDS
                     PLUS GARBAGE
                     SOLIDS
            SEWAGE SOLIDS
            iNCINERA TED
            (FROM ANNUAL
             RE POPTS)
                                                     DETROIT ONLY
                                                     SEWAGE SOLIDS
                                                     80% RECOVERY
                                                                -DETROIT ONLY
                                                                 SEWAGE SOLIDS
                                                                 SOX RECOVERY .
      1940     1945
                                                                      1975    I960
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3 D

-------
CITY OF DETROIT        DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY    DIVISION OF ENGINEERING

 SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT-ENLARGEMENT PROGRAM
    TOTAL SOLIDS- ENTERING & LEAVING SEDIMENTATION TANKS
    PAST, PRESENT AND ESTIMATED FUTURE        SHEET NO.  5 OF 5

COMPUTED BY  V.ANDERSON   DRAWN BY  M.S.Y.           DATE JUNE 7, 1957
  2600
     1940
1945   1950    1955
 I960   1965
YEARS
1970   1975   I960

       EXHIBIT 3E

-------
\
         //       •
     ,,//   ;    ;         J?^

              •    ';/'*   '--'^//l


               I       /;   •lilll
     :?/•'•.'$.                 ' '-""r^-C" *~- ^'•jb
 /•.'-•-V.'-'-";-''^ \' • :-       ' '' """*""*'.       *""*";i.^V>
  ;;  ; :| •'•'••/•    •'/         ::^^?:
.••!£*$**$$''  "     •' i^~"

     SEWAGE  TREATMENT  PLANT
                                                                      ;;    - .-'••: '.   "••- ..... r '
                                                                      •>.•••,.; •-••-•.'..••*,.,     ......
                                                                      ••••;;^.:"..;''>^«>
                                                                           '
                                                                                      •
                                                                                                   FIRST  STEP

                                                                                                   SECOND STEP

                                                                                                   THIRD  STEP
                                                                                                                  JULY 1957
            DESIGNED BY
            DRAWN BY
            T RACED BY  f^/'^j/
            C H^ CKbD BY /T^f i. ./T ,
                              ENLARGEMENT PROGRAM
                                 GENERAL PLAN SHOWING
                               ADDITIONS IN THREE STEPS
        CITY OF DETROIT
DEPARTMENT  OF  WATER SUPPLY
   DIVISION OF ENGINEERING
B-IOOO
                                                                                                                 EXHIBIT A

-------
                                                        438

                                            SECTION  2
                 DETROIT'S  SEWAGE  SYSTEM
                      1957 to  Present
A.  Map of Area Served  in  1962  —  (See Exhibit 2.1)

B.  Sewage Treatment  Plant Layout  in  1962  —

                                   (See Exhibit 2.2)

C.  Cost of Additions from 1957 to Present

    1.  Sewage Treatment Plant           —   $ 4,229,069

    2.  Interceptors, Regulators and

        Sanitary Pumping Stations,  Detroit    $ 31465,109

                                      Total:  $ 7,694,176

    3»  Interceptors  and Sanitary  Pumping

        Stations — Suburbs              —   $30,518,128

                            (See Exhibit 2.3)

        Federal funds received  —

                             1940  to date—   $10,203,750

D.  Population Served :

    Approximately 3>100,000 in  Detroit, including 1,400,000

    in 47 suburban communities.  Five more will be added

    within the next year.  The  suburban population served

    increased 740,000.

E.  Detroit Sewage Disposal System  - Enlargement and

    Improvement Program, dated  July 22, 1957

    This program presents a step-by-step schedule for

    plant and interceptor additions to provide sewage

-------
                                                        439
                                            SECTION 2

    treatment facilities for 4,000,000 people by 1980.
    It  is estimated that these improvements and additions
    will cost $32,794,000.  However, it should be under-
    stood that we are not limiting the Sewage Treatment
    Plant to 2000 c.f.s., or a population of 4,000,000.
    Any additions and improvements that are necessary to
    serve the load we have shall be made.  The program
    was approved by Michigan State Health Officials.
                      (See Exhibit 2.4)
         (The Exhibits referred to in Section 2 are as
follows:)

-------
sWARREN
    a
     DETROIT  METROPOLITAN

        TREATMENT  SERVICE AREA
      Exhibit 2.1
                             (,U

-------
X
*-<•»*' iOCAT/OM  Of
                                                      <  '•'••      •""•      /•••  "'"r"-'^-ir^->i    "'•"•-••?.:?
                                                                                r,:.
                                                                           j^
                                                         ?             --,...
                                                                               -^'£,*•<*"}**'«'/'.
         SEWAGE   TREATMENT  PLANT
                                                                                                      [.,, j FIRST  STEP

                                                                                                           SECOND  STEP

                                                                                                      j. -''.I THIRD STEP

                                                                                                           COMPLETED SINCE 1957

                                                                                                   REV MARCH 1962             JULY  '9b7
DEi siNED BY / gt. <", v
DRA*K(_BY _
TRACED BY"  ST^TT"

L Nt f\fcp BY T1"?^ .-C". .
                                                      ENLARGEMENT  PROGRAM
                                                         GENERAL PLAN  SHOWING
                                                       ADDITIONS IN  THREE STEPS
                                                                            CITY OP DETROIT
                                                                    DEPARTMENT OF WATER SUPPLY
                                                                       DIVISION  OF  ENGINEERING
B-IOOO
                                                                                                                          EXHIBIT 2.2

-------
                                                  Exhibit 2.3
DETROIT'S S3V/AG3 DISPOSAL SYSTEM ADDITIONS. 1957-1962
Dewage Treatment riant Additions
Date
One fly ash collector
Two sedimentation tanlos
Enlarged effluent conduit
Employees service building
One centrifugal filter
New chlorinators

To be constructed — 1962-63:
Rouge River outfall
One multiple- hearth incinerator



Completed
1959
1960
1961
1961
1961
1961
Total:






Cost
C 95, 989
$1, 800, 000
$ 676, 500
$ 87, 495
$ 60, 000
$ 19, 085
$2, 739, 069

$ 750, 000
$ 740, 000
$1, 490, 000
$4, 229, 069
Interceptors, Regulators and Sanitary Pumping Stations
Date
Regulator and diversion works
\V. McNichols
Repairs, H.V7. Interceptor at Southfield
Conner Sanitary Pumping Station
River Rouge Section, N.Y/. Interceptor
Rouge Siphon " "
Back water gates, Chicago and Tireinan

Completed

1S58
1860
1961
1961
1961-62
1961
Total:
Cost

$ 99, 107
0 211,320
£ 949, 046
$1,328,000
v 639, 000
$ 238, 636
$3, 465, 109
                                                     $7,694,178

-------
                                                        Exhibit  2. 3 (Contd.)

Suburbs!

    Interceptors and Pumping Stations
                                           Date Completed        Cost

    Grosse Points V7oods - Harper Woods          1950         $6,318,950

        Milk River Flood Control Station

        Pumping Station, storage and retention

        ponds

    Grosse Pointe Park

        Additions to pumping station                1961         $  175,000

    Dearborn E.  Side, Sewage Treatment Plant

        connected to Detroit                       1960         $  500,000

    Allen Park - connected to Detroit              1959         $   30,000

    Farmington and Evergreen - Farmington

        District                               1960 and 1962   $15,000,000

        Sanitary interceptors, pumping stations

        and trunk sewers to deliver sewage to

        Detroit for treatment

    Farmington                                  1958         $  800,000

        Sanitary interceptor to Detroit for

        treatment and treatment of combined

        sewer overflows (settling, chlorination

        and dewatering to interceptor)
                                                    Total:    $22, 823, 950 *


    * These figures do not include any storm sewerage facility costs.

-------
                                                        440
                                              SECTION 3
                      STORM FLOWS
A.  The Detroit Sewage Treatment Plant treats storm flow
    to the extent that the large size storm drains can
    store "flow".  The regulator construction and plant
    operating practices combine to provide treatment for
    a considerable amount of street run-off.
B.  The designed capacity of the plant and the interceptors
    is to handle 324 gallons per day per capita.  The water
    consumption is 154 gallons per day per capita and less
    during storm period.  The excess capacity over normal
    flow is for storm water treatment.
C.  The City of Detroit has spent $350,000,000 on trunk and
    public sewers, not including laterals.  The area system
    probably has cost at least $500,000,000.
D.  The Detroit practice of treating storm flows to the ex-
    tent we do more than leads the field in that most
    local areas are now only wrestling with sanitary
    flow.  The storm flows in Canada and adjacent United
    States areas to Detroit are not treated.  In addition,
    all adjacent truck farm areas liberate large amounts
    of insecticides and fertilizers.  Therefore, improve-
    ment above that practiced by Detroit on storm flow
    treatment should not be advanced except that it be
    adopted for the area.

-------
                                                        441



                                                SECTION 4



                   PRESENT DEVELOPMENTS



A.   Status of Detroit  River at Present



     Detroit Department of Water Supply Sampling Data  -



     Detroit River




     For many years the Detroit Department  of Water Supply



     has sampled the Detroit and Rouge  Rivers to learn the



     sanitary quality of these  waters.   From May until the



     middle of October, weekly  samples  have been taken on



     ranges across the  Detroit  River from United States to



     Canada.  The locations of  these are as follows:



          Range 5A   —   From  Zug Island waste bed to



                          Canada, 700 feet  above outfall



          Range 6A   —   Zug Island, across outfall to



                          Canada, 100 feet  above Rouge River



          Range 7A   —   Detroit Edison River Rouge  Station



                          to Canada, 400 feet below Rouge



                          River



          Range 8A   —   Great  Lakes Steel, north end to



                          head  of Fighting  Island, then due



                          east  to Canada




          Ran^e 5o   —   Wyandotte to head of Grassy Island



                          to Fighting Island



    Samples are also collected weekly throughout the year



across the Trenten Channel Toll Bridge and the Rouge River

-------
                                                    442



at Jefferson Avenue.  Monthly samples are collected



along the Rouge River from Eight Mile Road to Jeffer-



son Avenue.  Samples are also collected once a year



during the summer down river and along the Lake Erie



shore as far as Sterling State Park.



                 (Exhibit 4.1 & 4.1A)



The Detroit River samples collected during the past



three years have shown the sanitary quality of the



water as far downriver as the Trenton Channel to be



improving.  In fact, the trend is definitely towards



better quality.  The bacteriological pollution present



is along the American and Canadian shores.



                (See Exhibit 4.2)




Rouge Riven



The Rouge River shows increasing bacteriological pol-



lution, with the largest increase during the past year.



(See Exhibit 4.3)  The flows through the Rouge River



at the Jefferson Avenue Bridge approximate that through



the Detroit Sewage Treatment outfall due to the large



quantities of water taken from the old arm of the



Rouge River and released at the Rouge Plant by the



Ford Motor Car Company.



Bacteriological Quality Related to Depths:



Most bacteriological sampling of rivers is done at




or near the surface of the stream.  This type of

-------
                                                    443



sampling determines the surface quality only.  It is



questionable If surface sampling reflects the true



bacteriological quality of the river.  Evidence exists



to show that depth sampling will show less pollution.



Fishing in Lake Erie and the Detroit River;



It is a well known fact that fish will not remain in



heavily polluted waters.  Yet pickerel and perch



are caught in the entire length of the Detroit River



and also in the western end of Lake Erie.  This evidence



substantiates the theory that the pollution is mainly



near the surface.



The Detroit News, on March 4, 1962, reported record



catches of perch in Lake Erie off Monroe County.  Fisher-



men are advised by the Conservation Officer to walk



out from the shore at Luna Pier, Bolles Harbor, Avalon



Beach and Sterling State Park.



                (See Exhibit 4.41)



I.J.C. Data on Detroit and Rouge Rivers;



The I.J.C. data over the past three years have not



always covered the same ranges across the Detroit



River.  In two oases the same ranges were sampled,



namely, Dt. 14. W and Dt. 12. OW.  The results agree



with those of the Department of Water Supply.  There



has been a decrease in the ooliform pollution over



the past years downstream as far as Trenton Channel.

-------
                                                       444



   Their data on the Rouge River agree with that obtained



   by the Detroit Department of Water Supply also in that



   they show an increase in ooliforra pollution during the



   past three years.



                    (See Exhibit 4.5)



   Aerial Picture of Junction of Rouge and Detroit Riverst



                    (See Exhibit 4.6)



   This color photo shows the location of the treatment



   plant outfall and flow very clearly.  It is located



   in the upper right hand corner about 200 feet above



   the Rouge River  and about 400 feet from shore.



   Contamination upstream from the outfall can also be



   seen as well as  heavy pollution coming from the



   Rouge River.  There is little mixing of the outfall



   flow and the Rouge flow until they blend several hundred



   feet below the Rouge.  The outfall flow rises to the



   surface.



B. The Michigan Department of Health Engineering Division



   and the Michigan Water Resources Commission on January



   8, 1962, issued  a report titled:  "Some Significant



   Accomplishments  and Trends in Pollution Control In the



   Greater Detroit  Metropolitan Area During the Period



   1957-1962."



   During this period, projects to control pollution valued



   at $52,620,000 have been completed, and those in progress

-------
                                                    445



or scheduled for 1962 are valued at $51,200,000, or a



total of $103,820,000,



Excerpts from this report are as follows:



"Today the communities and industries in the Greater



Detroit Metropolitan area are culminating a period of



coordinated effort in pollution control.  This is dem-



onstrated by the number, type and magnitude of waste



treatment works completed or scheduled for completion



this year in all sections of this six county area.



Most of the municipal installations will have reserves



in capacity sufficient to meet the needs of anticipated



growth until 1980 or later.  Some are planned for



ultimate development of the community.



"The principle of a coordinated system of interceptor



sewers serving several communities delivering sewage



to a central treatment works has gained favor in the



last decade in several new areas.  The framework for



such a system was developed in the mid-thirties by



Detroit and Wayne County.  During the past five years



this system has been expanded and strengthened In major



portions of the fast growing areas of Oakland County



and Maoomb County.  Wayne County Is almost wholly de-



pendent upon three major and other minor systems of



this kind.  These coordinated multi-community facilities



have removed most of the pollution from the lower end
                                               GPO 8208I9-B-21

-------
                                                    446


 of Lake St. Glair. By June, 1962, pollution from  sewage


 will be largely eliminated from all branches of the


 Rouge River.  By these means health hazards and condition^


 of nuisance will be effectively reduced for large seg-


 ments of  the population.


 ". , . That the tempo of construction of control facil-


 ities throughout the area has been accelerated tremen-


dously since 1959 is very evident.  Equally obvious is


 the increased protection to the Lake Erie, Lake St.


 Glair, the Detroit River and the tributary streams which


 the facilities now under construction or to be commenced


 this year will provide when completed.


 "Increasing emphasis on effective disinfection for


 bacteriological control of effluents will assure im-


 provements in water quality in the receiving waters


 as the new projects are completed and placed in oper-
                    \

 ation.  This is an Important and significant trend


 in both present and future installations.


 "For the  future many communities are preparing either


 by themselves, or through county agencies, to assess


 future needs and how best to meet them.  Several out-


 standing  examples illustrate this trend.  The City of


 Detroit is continuing to broaden its long range plan


 to serve  the metropolitan area with waste transportation


 facilities.  Wayne County, through its Department of

-------
                                                        44?
    Public Works, is planning how to extend its interceptor
    and treatment system for the entire county beyond 1980 to
    ultimate development.  Oakland County, through its
    Department of Public Works, is planning facilities for
    the Clinton River and Huron Basins.  Communities in the
    Huron River basin in Washtenaw County have adopted a
    water use management policy for the Lower Huron River.
    Thus the stage is being set to meet the needs of a grow-
    ing dynamic society years in advance.  This is a healthy
    and progressive approach which bids fair to continue the
    shift from corrective action to prevention -- to be
    ahead rather than behind in pollution control."
C.  Michigan Department of Health Approval of Detroit
    Sewage Disposal System Enlargement and Improvement
    Program, July 22, 1957
    At a meeting in Lansing, Michigan, on July 22, 1957,
    between representatives of the Engineering Division of
    the Michigan Department of Health and Engineers of the
    Detroit Department of Water Supply, the enlargement and
    improvement program for the Detroit Sewage Disposal
    System was tentatively approved with the exception of
    the Rouge overflow outlet channel.
    In a letter of March 14, 1958, the formal approval for
    the auxiliary outfall to the Rouge River was given.
    This completed the approval for the whole project.

-------
                                                        448



    Approvals from Wayne, Oakland and Macomb Counties were



    obtained.  On May 13, 1958, the Common Council of the



    City of Detroit took formal action approving and author-



    izing the program, whichis in effect now.



                    (See Exhibit 4.7)



D.  Facilities under construction or about to go in service



    in the immediate area of Detroit to abate pollution are



    valued at approximately $29,000,000.



                    (See Exhibit 4.8)



         Rouge Valley Sewage Disposal System, Exhibit 4.9



         Down River Sewage Disposal System, Exhibit 4.10



         Northeast Interceptor District, Exhibit 4.11



E.  Dequindre Interceptor — 1962-63



    An auxiliary sanitary interceptor to deliver sewage from



    Southeastern Oakland County Sewage Disposal District to



    Detroit for treatment has been planned.  In addition,



    facilities for storage and retention of overflows from



    the combined sewers with subsequent dewatering to the



    Interceptor are to be built.



    The purpose of the above is to prevent untreated sewage



    to flow into Red Run Drain and the Clinton River.



         Cost of interceptor alone              — $4,500,000



         With Combined sewer overflow controls  —  7,000,000



    Twelve Towns Drain



    In this same area, a relief sewer project is proposed

-------
                                                    449



to carry off storm waters, thus preventing flooding and



health hazards from a mixture of sewage and storm water,
      (The Exhibits to Section 4 are as follows:)

-------
              TYPICAL WINTER AND SUMMER MONTHS
               UPPER ROUGE BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA
                     February 18,  1959
                                                     Exhibit 4.1
Sample
No.
1-A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
IT
18
19
Location
of
Sample
8-Mile at Telegraph
8-Mlle at Berg Rd.
7 -Mile Rd.
6-Mile Rd.
5-Mile Rd.
Telegraph-Bell Branch
Schoolcraft
Plymouth
Joy Road
Telegraph-Middle Branch
Warren Road
Ford Road
Telegraph-Lower Branch
Southfield Road
Rotunda Drive
Greenfield Road
Schaefer Road
Dix Road
Pore Street
Jefferson Avenue
Water
Temp.
°F.
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
32
33
37
40
39
41
D.O.
PPM
9.6
4.4
9.9
10.2
10.9
10.6
10.0
9.8
10.0
11.3
10.2
10.4
11.9
10.7
10.6
10.5
9.7
9.7
10.7
9.9
%
St'd
66
30
68
70
75
73
68
67
68
77
70
71
81
73
73
73
72
75
81
77
B.Q.D.
PPM
11
12
12
12
13
14
12
12
12
18
14
14
18
19
24
36
24
16
16
18
Colifonc
Index-
M.P.N.
4,400
93,000
9,300
2,300
43,000
43,000
43,000
93,000
43,000
23,000
43,000
75,000
*
93,000
93,000
230,000
430,000
230,000
93,000
230,000
*  Sample Lost.

-------
UPPER ROOOE BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA




                    1959



Saaple Water
Hog Location of Sanple Te«p °F«
1-A
1
2
3
I*
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
U»
15
16
17
18
19
8-Mile Road
MlHe Road
7-Mile Road
6-Mile Road
5-Mile Road
Telegraph-Bell Branch
Schooler aft
Plymouth
Joy Road
Telegraph-Middle Branch
Warren Road
Ford Road
Telegraph-Lover Branch
Southf ield Road
Rotunda Ifcrire
Greenfield Road
Sehaef er Road
Due Road
Port Street
Jefferson Avenue
71*
7k
75
7k
76
75
71*
7k
76
76
76
71*
72
7k
Ik
7k
83
86
81*
83

0.0.
P.P.M,
3.5
3-6
14.3
U.9
3.3
3.6
2.5
1.8
l.l
3.3
0
.6
1.1
2.1
0.8
1.3
1.2
0.6
0
0

*
Sat'd
U.
U2
50
56
39
U2
29
21
13
39
0
9
13
25
10
16
15
8
0
0

B.O.D.
P.P.M.
1*
6
k
5
5
7
5
1*
6
1*
9
7
7
5
6
11
6
6
6
10
Colifo™
Index
K.P.H.
9,300
15,000
7,500
15,000
23,000
1*3,000
23,000
21,000
210,000
1*3,000
1*,600>000
930,000
2,1*00,000
2,1*00,000
930,000
2,1*00,000
930,000
2,1*00,000
930,000
1,500,000

-------
UPPER B400I BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA
         January 28.. I960
                                             Collfor»
Sample Water
No. Location of Sample Temp.
1A
1
2
3
4
5
6
1
8
9
10
11
12
13
Ik
15
16
17
18
19
8 -Mil* Road
8-Mile Road
7 -Mile Road
6 -Nile Road
5-Mile Road
Telegraph-Bell Branch
Schoolaraft
Plymouth
Joy Road
Telegraph-Middle Branch
Warren Road
Ford Road
Telegraph -Lower Branch
Southfleld Road
Rotunda Drive
Greenfield Road
Schaefer Road
Dix Road
Fort Street
Jeffer»on Ave.
34
34
3^
32
33
32
32
32
34
34
34
34
34
32
35
40
41
44
44
44
D.O.
F.P.M.
11.5
9-2
12.1
12.5
12.2
11.9
12.0
11.8
11.0
12.6
10.5
10.7
11.4
11.1
10.5
3.3
9-3
10.6
10.3
9-4
%
Sat'd
81
65
86
85
85
61
82
81
78
89
74
75
80
76
75
64
73
86
84
77
B.O.D.
P. P.M.
2
9
6
6
7
a
9
9
11
7
13
12
18
14
15
22
21
13
10
9
Index
M.P.H.
93,ooo
93,000
43,000
43,000
43,000
ZHO,000
240,000
240.000
240. OOO
23,OOO
240,000
460,000
240,000
240,000
230,000
2,400,000
2,400,000
93.000
150,000
93,000

-------
UPPER ROUGE BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA
         July 21, I960

Sample
No.
1A
1
2
3
k
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

Location of Sample
8-Mile Road at Telegraph
8 -Mile Road at Berg Road
7 -Mile Road
6 -Mile Road
5 -Kile Road
Telegraph -Bell Branch
Schoolcraft
Plymouth
Joy Road
Telegraph-Hiddle Branch
Warren Road
Ford Road
Telegraph-Lower Branch
Southfield
Rotunda Drive
Greenfield Road
Sohaefer Road
Dix Road
Fort Street
Jef fereon Avenue

Te^p.
V
66
67
68
68
68
70
67
70
69
68
68
68
69
72
75
78
80
82
82
BO

D.C.
P. P.M.
5.1
2.5
6.7
7.5
4.3
12.1
4.8
5.8
1.3
2.9
0
0
.5
0
0
0
0
.8
1.9
.7

Sat'
54
27
74
81
47
13*
52
65
14
32
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
23
1

B.O.D.
d P. P.M.
3
5
4
4
5
9
6
6
8
6 a
•> 19
> 19
9
17 >
•£. 19
19
17
7
5
4
Coliform
Index ,
M.P.N.
23,000
43,000
93,000
23,OOO
9,300
360
9,300
4,300
1,100,000
2,400,000
240,000
9,300
93,000
2,400,000
2,400,000
2,400,000
2,400,000
930.000
430,000
230.0OO

-------
UPPER ROUGE BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA
      February 21, 1961
Water
Saaple Temp. D.O.
No. Location of Sample P. p. P.M.
1A
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
8 -Mile Road at Telegraph
8-Mile Road at Berg Road
7 -Mile Road
6 -Mile Road
5-Mile Road
Telegraph — Bell Branch
Schoolcraft
Plymouth
Joy Road
Telegraph — Middle Branch
Warren Road
Ford Road
Telegraph — Lower Branch
Southfield
Rotunda Drive
Greenfield Road
Schaefer Road
Dix Road
Port Street
Jefferson Avenue
37 9.8
33 5.1
32 10.1
32 10.8
32 10.3
32 7.4
33 9.6
34 9.2
33 8.7
34 11.0
34 7.6
34 7.9
34 7.4
34 10.5
34 9-8
40 9.3
44 9-3
44 9.9
44 10.8
44 9.8
%
Sat'd
72
35
69
74
70
51
67
65
60
78
54
56
52
74
69
72
76
81
88
80
Coliform
B.O.D. Index ,
P. P.M. M.P.N.
8
10
10
10
10
8
8
10
12
10
28
24
17
16
18
24
24
6
8
6
93,000
93,000
2,300
2,300
43,000
93,000
120 , 000
93,000
93,000
43,000
1 , 500 , 000
1,500,000
2,400,000
430,000
930 , ooo
1 , 500 , 000
2,400,000
230,000
150,000
9,300

-------
UPPER ROUGE BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA



          Augmt 24, 1961
Staple
No.
1A.
^
2.
3
-/ -
4.
5-
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13-
14.
15-
16.
17.
18.
19-
Water
*&*•
Location of Saaple ?.
8-Mile Road at Telegraph
8 -Nile Road at Berg Road
7 -Nil* Road
6 -Mile Road
5-Mile Road
Telegrapn--B«ll Brancn
Soboolcraf t
Plymouth
Joy Road
Telegraph--Ml 2. ,400.
> 2,400,
> 2,400,
>: 2,400,
2^0
230,
4,600,
230,
930,
2,400,
-> 24 , 000
4 , 600 .
230.
430,
430,
000
ooo
000
000
000
ooo
ooc
ooo
000
000
ooo
000
ooo
ooo
000
.000
000
ooo
ooo
ooo

-------
 1
 2
 3
 6
 7
 B
 9
10
11-A
11-B
13-A
13-E
                  Location
   UK.TH01T RIVER BACTERIOLOGICAL - 1959
LOWER RIVER AND LAKE ERIE SHOftELXffE SAMPLING
               Auguat 21, 1959
                    Collfon*        TgMp.
                   Index, H.P.H
Ft, of Southfield
Ft.  of Superior. Wyandotte
Boat DOCK, Elizabeth  ftork, Trenton
Ft. of Coral  Street,  OlbrmltmT-
Gibraltar Bajr at Park
Ft. of Dee Roati, Mapl*  Beach
Silver Cw«k  at River Road
Huron River at River  Road
Eatral Beach
Swan Creak at River Road
Point Aux  r*axuc at Point
Point Aux  Peaux at Dlxcm Drive
Stony rolnt Haven at  Shore
Stony Point Haven,  350  ft.  fro* Shore
Sterling State Park at  StK>re
                                                                             Obaervatlona
240,000
240,000
43.000
2.300
9.300
13,000
43.000
24.OOO
24,000
4.300
9.300
4,300
2,300
26
a*
81 Turbid
80
fl2
82
82
66
8?
86
85 " , Septic Odor
86
83
65
63 Lo« water, turfald
82 "
8O Pav Battier*. No Ba
\ •»* 1 1 ^4*
                 (HOTE:  Clear, hot, hwild,  90° F-. Wind W. ,S¥,  6 M.P.H. ,  1O:OO A.W. ,  2:3O P.*. )

-------
                                    EBTROIT RIVER BACTERIOLOGICAL DATA—1960
                                  LOWER RIVER AMD LAKE ERIE SHORELDOC SAMPLING
                                               AUGUST 18, I960
3anpl<
 Mo.
 Location
 1    Ft. of Southfield
 2    Ft. of Superior, Wyandotte
 3    Boat Dock, Elizabeth Park, Trenton
 4    Ft. of Coral St., Gibraltar
 5    Ft. of Bftyrlew,  Gibraltar
 6    Ft. of Lee Road, Maple Beaeh
 7    Silver Creek at  River Road
 8    Huron River at River Road
 9    Eatral B«ach
 10    Swan Creek, at River Road
 11A  Point Aux Peaux at  Point
 11B  Point Aux Peaux at  Dlxon Drlv«
 13A  Stony Point HaT«n at Shor«
 13B  Stony Point Har«n,  10O ft.  from Shor«
 14    St«rling Stat«  Park, 300  ft.  from Shor«

 MOTE;-
Colifor*
 Index,
 M.P.K.
 9,300
15,000
                                       15,000
                                        9,300
                                       23,000
                                        9,300
                                       23,000
                                       15,000
                                        4,300
                                        9,300
                                        2,100
                                           930
                                           430
                                            93
Temp.
 °F.          o b s e r v a t i 6 n s
 76      Turbid, Oil Slick.
 76      Turbid.
 77      Turbid, Oil Slick.
 79      Turbid, Oil Sllok.
 79      Dirty.
 79      Dirty.
 78      Turbid, Slow Flow.
 78      Turbid, Slow Flow.
 77      Dirty.
 78      Turbid, Slow Flow.
 76      Turbid,
 76      Turbid,50 Bathers.
   78     Turbid.
 77      Turbid, Pier Collapsed.
 76      Turbid, Clean,  taken by  boat,
          6 Bathers.
(gaovuly, hu.id, 1/2 mile visibility, 80° F., Wind E.  S.E.,  14 W.P.I.,  9:*5 a...-2:20 p...

-------
                                                EXHIBIT 4.2
            W. JEFFERSON
           AVE. BRIDGE
RANGE
5A
6A
7B
8A
U. S SHORE
TO 1 B.-FT.
1500
1600
1300
1500
TRENTON
 TOLL
BRIDGE
                GREAT LAKES RR. *
                      BRIDGED
                                             MAP OF DETROIT
                                             RIVER, SHOWING
                                             REGULAR SAMPLING
                                             RANGES.

-------
RANGE 5A
ZUG ISLAND WASTE BED TO CANADA
    D.W.S.  700 FT. ABOVE  OUTFALL
            5OO
      1000       1500      2000
       FT. FROM  U.S.  SHORE
2500
30OO

-------
RANGE 6A   ZUG ISLAND,  ACROSS OUTFALL TO CANADA
             D.WS.   100 FT. ABOVE  ROUGE RIVER
iOO.OQO
            5OO
1000       I50O       2000

     FT. FROM U. S. SHORE
                                                  2500
3000

-------
RANGE 7B     DET. ED  CO. RIVER ROUGE  STA  TO  CANADA
                 DWS       400 FT.  BELOW  ROUGE  RIVER
           500
1000       1500       2000       2500
      FT   FROM U.S.  SHORE
                                                              3000
                                                                   GPO 82O81»—B-22

-------
RANGE  8A   GT. LAKES  STEEL, N. END TO HD. FIGHTING  ISLAND DWS.
   - ^                           EAST
                                                2SOO
                                                          3000
                         FT.  FROM U.S.  SHORE

-------
«ANCE SB   WYANDOTTE  TO GRASSY ISLAND  TO  FIGHTING  ISLAND
     DWS
                                                                   4&o
                FT. FROM  U. S. SHORE

-------
RANGE 12
    D.WS.
      TRENTON  CHANNEL  -  TOLL  BRIDGE
500        1000       I50O      2000
       FT. FROM  W. SHORE  CMAINLAND)

-------
                                                   Exhibit 4.3
            ROUGE RIVER BACTERIOLOGICAL COUNTS
               WEST JEFFERSON AVENUE BRIDGE
 Detroit Department of Water Supply

       Samples collected once a week throughout the year

       Median Values:

             1959     --     150.000MPN
             1960     --     158,000   "
             1961     --     230,000   "


 International Joint Commission

       1961 samples collected the first part of the year from DTI Railroad

       Bridge--the remainder from West Jefferson Avenue Bridge

            *1959     --      43.000MPN
            *1960     --      58,000   "
             1961     --     330,000   "
* Collected from DTI Railroad Bridge only.
 Values low due to Detroit River flow through old arm of Rouge.

-------
 REPORT SPECTACULAR CATCHES  Detroit News   3/4/62


        Lake  Erie  Perch  Are   Biting

  If you want to try fishing for j for the past couple of weeks,   Spud a hole almost anywhere,
I perch in Lake Erie, off Monroe iMmick reports.             ;n<> Myi  amj you ougnt to ^
 Count,,  where ft. catches are: J^J,'^ sT^y'of'?«** «" "** I** *
 reportedly *p*ctmcular. Conser-'minrow, for hnji ,re a,j you'll ;fnr*  manV m
-------
  EXHIBIT 4.5
RANGE DTRG 19.8-
                            RANGE  DT 12 OW

-------
RANGE  OT 25.7
U.S.  ENGINEERS  TO HIRAM  WALKER DOCK
             1961  DATA  IJC
                                                                      JSOO
                            FT. FROM U.S.  SHORE

-------
RANGE  OT^Oft    DET. ED CO. DELRAY  DOCK TO  C.IL. DOCK WINDSOR
                            IJC DATA

                             FT. FROM U S  SHORE

-------
RANGE I7.0E
       I.J.C.
100*0.
  FIGHTING  ISLAND TO CANADA
            500
1000
                         FT. FROM FIGHTING  ISLAND

-------
KANGC OT 17 4 W
         I J C
                       ECORSE LIGHT TO HD. FIGHTING ISLAND
               300
1000       1500       2000
   FT.  FROM U. S. SHORE
                                                                  sooo

-------
RANGE OT 14.6W





100.000
WYANDOTTE  CITY DOCK TO FIGHTING  ISLAND
               BOO
        1000        1500       2000



             FT. FROM  U.S. SHORE
2500
3000
3500

-------
MANOE OT  IX.O
      IJC
TRENTON  CHANNEL TOLL BRIDGE



                            FT  FROM  U S SHORE

-------
1959
i960
Sewage Pumped MOD
Arlth. Stat.

January
February
March
April
May
June
Juty
Aufiut
September
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
Auguat
September
October
November
December

January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December

January
February
Mean
533.3
563.0
575.3
S40.1
626.3
636.9
642.3
632.1
619.3
610.8
579.4
649.2
629.5
692.8
588.6
602.0
614.6
870.9
586.8
618.1
576.1
542.3
550.2
512.5

541.8
592.1
561.8
647.7
619.1
578.0
575.8
•01.4
603.0
504.3
523.5
507.7

546.5
549.1
Mean
••••^•••M

636
646
635
617
601
569
628
596
584
594
596
606
673
589
628
572
546
544
617

540
576
562
629
611
•68
568
599
602
500
496
496

516
547
Temperature
of Tank Effluent

52
51
51
56
63
71
76
78
75
67
55
52
50
55
62
67
74
f v
7K
1 O

fil
01

c/j
9V
11
O.1
Ot\
60
Jt7
Of
MA
73
MA
76
MC
75






Biochemical Oayien Demand-
Influent
PPm
118.0
101.6
97.3
103.2
108.1
104.8
106. •
81.9
96.9
108.0
100.6
111.0
106.5
107.0
115.3
119.8
118.1
100.7
101.6
101.1
114.4
107.9
111.5
132.9

131.6
145.4
102.9
115.1
101.9
115.5
86. 9
18. 3
93.8
123.6
125.7
*•*" •
124.0

134.4
136.1

Effluent
pprn
96.4
77.0
71.6
69.4
64.9
U.I
•3.6
•3.0
64.1
65.3
72.3
78.6
78.4
86.3
T9.6
13.1
59.1
•4.8
M.O
76.4
7T.1
•1.9
91. •

90.4
9T.O
76.8
70. •
67.7
«8.<
60.1
54.9
59.3
69.7
74.0
84.8

81.9
86.6

%
IWuction
1ft. 1
14.1
15.4
30.5
40.0
39.3
40.2
36.1
44.2
39.5
32.1
35.4
33.2
16.
25.
S3.
IS.
41.
M.
34.
33.2
18.6
14.5
31.1

31.
33.
16.
38.
33.
40.
30.
tt.
36.
43.
41.
29.

39. 7
34.3


-------
             Suspended Solids
Effluent -
Arlth. Mean





338
346
285
277
343
335
391
378
392
423
309
431
332
320
340
366
347
384
394
399
481
358
375
346
332
290
274
296
293
314
361
381
402
1000 IbB.
Suit. Mean





335
340
290
273
322
321
395
371
385
416
410
429
342
325
346
369
350
376
392
406
472
350
358
312
328
276
283
297
303
315
354
344
394
Influent
ppm
236.4
204.1
234.2
259.0
271.2
237.2
235.3
206. 1
204.9
196.6
167.9
197.4
202.9
197.0
209.3
277. 1
272.5
245. 5
187.1
207.9
199.6
209.6
224. 9
214.4
198. 1
314.8
235.0
261.3
206.8
246.8
180.9
182.4
210.9
229. 7
285.4
228. 7
258.8
241.9
Effluent
ppm
134.2
126.0
124.6
119.8
113.0
109.2
111.6
98.3
108.0
98.9
95. 1
107.5
110.3
117.0
123. 1
133.8
126.6
100.2
94.0
94.8
102.8
117.2
108. 3
116.0
107.0
158.8
122.9
123.0
10J.3
101.9
98.7
93.9
97.3
101.3
136.9
128.2
140.5
133.0
*
Reduction
43.2
38.3
46.8
53.8
58.3
54.0
52.6
52.3
47.3
49.7
43.4
45.5
45.6
40.6
41.2
51.7
53.5
59.2
49.8
54.4
48.5
44.1
51.9
45.9
46.0
49.6
47.7
52.9
50.5
58.7
45.4
48.5
53.9
55.9
52.0
43.9
45.1
45.0
Effluent
Arlth. Mean - 1000 Iba





588
603
519
561
508
472
594
598
589
605
680
651
562
465
492
491
532
495
496
486
814
575
677
537
489
478
473
491
427
617
566
678
622
•Docs not include grit and screenings

-------
      Special Compilation of Operating Data  —  Detroit Sewage Treatment Piant (Contd.)
1959
1960
 1961
 1962
Sedimentation Tanks


January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
January
February
Number in
Service
7.0
7.9
9.1
8.7
6.4
5.2
5.5
6.0
6.1
6.2
7.7
8.8
9.3
8.3
8.6
7.9
7.1
6.8
6.4
6.0
6.1
6.9
7.5
5.7
6.8
6.6
5,8
7.1
7.2
6.6
7.3
8.2
7.8
6.1
7.1
7.2
6.9
7.1
Detention
Time - Hrs.
0.91
.95
1.10
.94
.72
.57
.59
.66
.69
.70
.93
.94
1.02
.98
1.01
.92
.81
.70
.76
.68
.73
.89
.96
.77
.87
.71
.73
.77
.85
.80
.88
.95
.90
.84
.95
1.00
.88
.93
Chlorine
Demand
ppm
3.94
3.33
2.76
2.79
3.14
4.48
5.11
4.60
4.15
3.74
3.76
3.59
3.60
3.69
4.03
4.39
4.70
4.14
5.69
5.98
6.11
5.39
4.79
3.65
3.29
3.54
3.14
3.02
3.25
5.19
5.84
6.31
5.98
6.79
5.54
4.85
3.50
3.65
Chlorine
Applied
ppm
3.02
2.67
2.40
2.43
2.46
3.44
4.16
3.74
3.60
3.45
3.58
3.26
3.38
3.13
2.90
3.40
3.65
3.41
4.68
5.23
5.15
4.77
3.81
3.31
3.12
3.19
2.87
2.85
3.13
4.34
4.74
5.09
4.90
5.23
4.47
4.46
3.39
3,50
Chlorine
Residual
ppm
0.38
.60
.77
.56
.33
.26
.39
.36
.44
.39
.40
.44
.66
.67
.61
.71
.50
.33
.11
. 03
.38
.42
.17
.14
.30
.15
.14
.14
.07
.00?
.01
.12
.44
.34
.27
.11
.38
.33

-------
                                                  Page 2




Coliform Indices.  MPN,  x  1000
Tank
Effluent
3,830
1,589
1,970
2,880
4,564
7,820
11,200
15, 600
16,890
25, 600
7.819
3,615
2,470
2,790
2,710
3,680
7,200
11, 120
16,300
20,100
16,700
12,940
9,950
7,407
5,930
4.860
4,560
4,180
6.390
11,800
18,600
23, 900
19, 300
15, 700
10, 040
6,630
4,330
4,920

Geom. Mean
443
238.6
122
71.0
46.8
1,164
240
782
1.462
578
963.6
583.0
200
274
249
250
581
586.4
762
720
281
289
1,373
1,938
1,450
1,470
971
805
1,625
2,190
2,270
774.4
153
592
107
67.7
37.3
30.9
Final Effluent
Stat. Mean Adjusted Geom. Mean Adjusted Me41*n





1, 100
270
840
1,790
700
1,030
661
199
271
255
260
560
600
790
740
240
286
1,490 59.2 74
2,490 166 196
1,530 74.6 gg
1,480 69.1 85
950 36 44.8
848 45 30
1,125 51.4 77
2,260 150 169
2,250 242 280
1.000 96.9 109
150
543 123 133
120
70.7
37.3
36.8
                                            GPO 820BIO-B-23

-------
Exhibit 4.6

-------
                                                     Exhibit 4.7
                    EXCERPTS FROM
      MINUTES OF MEETING IN LANSING, MICHIGAN
            JULY 22, 1957 - 10:30 AM to 12 NOON
PLACE - Michigan Dept. of Health Bldg. - Office of W. Shephard

PRESENT:
  W. R. Shephard - Director, Division of Engrg.,  Mich. Dept. of Health
  D. M. Pierce - Division of Engineering,
  G. Remus - General Manager & Chief Engineer,  Detroit Water Supply
  V. Anderson - Engineer,
  Not Present - C. Palmer of the D.P.W.  - away on vacation

SUBJECT OF MEETING;
  Detroit Sewage Treatment Plant - Enlargement Program.  Particularly,
  the overflow channel to the Rouge River. One copy of the Enlargement
  Program was left with Mr. Pierce (Copy #3)

PURPOSE CF  MEETING:
  The purpose of the meeting was to get,  at this time, tentative approval
  of the Enlargement Program so it could be presented to the Mayor or
  Council.

DISCUSSION:
  No objection was raised to the program as a whole,  but Mr. Pierce
  wants more information about the overflow channel to the Rouge, such
  as how much flow and how often would the channel carry water to the
  Rouge, before he commits himself.  This information will be sent to him.

  Mr. Shephard then said that no one could object to our general enlarge-
  ment program, especially since we were trying to improve the River
  conditions.

CONCLUSIONS;
  Mr. Shephard will write a letter in a few days outlining his view on the
  program.
  Mr. Pierce wants to study the Rouge overflow outlet channel a little
  more before committing himself.

-------
           MICHIGAN  DEPARTMENT DF  HEALTH

                         LANSING 4, MICHIGAN
                                                  March 14, 1958
Mr. Ocra&d. Samuv
C atker* I tfAoasar
Department of  rfater  supply
735 Randolph Street
Detv-oiB 26, K
Dear Mr. Seous;
                     Betrolt S«vag« Treatment Plane
                         gtofde) - AoxiUory Roo^a Guclot
     This  latter  is vcittea  in response uo your* or Hacch 11.

     The information  supplied la your  latter, aad particularly CD the second
page tbtrccf f conflnra end farther «l*»oracat upon «aoh o* Cac coodtticn* otic
liaod  in our letter of February. 28 AS a b&*i* for approval of the proposed
•axillary  ootfall to  the Rouge SUscr.  YOU «4j rhacafoio uonaid&r cM* «« a
formal approve! ot tbe principlee outlined with raapect to this proposal.
We eball look forward with interact to receiving the plao* on4 «§ecifia*ti«j»
tor this work.
     In your  tetter, you provide soae infovtwtioa on the expeateo
tias of the effluent tron Che Detroit; ae««gs treataent plant aftec
treatment facilities ere installed.  Ve do -act have sufficient infor«*tio*
before ue to  know whether these ranges of quality would provide sufficient
pollution control ac the tiew installed or whethe* these ranges nay reason*
ably be expected to be produced by Che processes yon have ia mtjwl.  As
la our cooferenee on July 22 and subsequently in our diaaossion*, we «e«il0 o«
satisfied at  this tism to defer decision ea the speoi£ic wMaer of attaining
adequate poUucion control by additional treecaent facilities until you are
ready to sake apeci£i« plans for design of those facilities*  There should he
no difficulty in arriving at a decision with respect to degree of
required and  the best aemier of attaining that objective at that tisw.

                                   Very truly yours,

                                      s\          ^ __ ('7.
                                       tld li. Pieroe, Chief
                                   Section of Cewerags end Sewage Tteatacnt
                                   Division of Engineering
ec:  Mr. Clyde P*4»er

-------
                                                    Exhibit 4.8








 FACILITIES UNDER CONSTRUCTION OR ABOUT TO GO IN SERVICE








1962    - Northeast Interceptor District, Wayne County System




          Increase capacity of existing interceptor,




          three Macomb and three Wayne County




          communities	-	$   700,000.00






1961-62 - Centerline Interceptor	  1,300,000.00






1962    - Dearborn West Side Sewage Treatment Plant




          connected to Detroit	    296,000.00






1962-63 - Rouge Valley Interceptors	     18,000.00






1962-63 - Downriver Interceptors	     18,300.00



                                                     $38,596,000.00

-------
'ft.

-------
DIVISION OF COST
ROUGE VALLEY SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
ESTIMATED POPULATION AND MAXIMUM RATE OF SEWAGE FLOW


Municipality
Type
City
Twp.
Twp.
Twp.
City.
City
City
Twp.
Twp.
Twp.
Village
City
Twp.
City
Two



Name
Livonia
Nankin (1)
Redford
Dearborn (N)
Garden City
Plymouth
Northville
Northville (1)
Plymouth (1)
Canton
Inkster
Wayne
Van Buren (N)
Detroit (for D. H. O. C. )(2)
Romulus (NW)
TOTALS:
* Part of Ultimate
(1) Except Institutions
Ult. Pop.
to
Interceptor
192, 350
154,000
80,000
55,000
50,000
12,000
9, 000
4, 000 *
24, 000 *
30, 000 *
50,000
39,000
8,000 *
4, OdO
9,000
720, 350



Total
c. f. s.
77.94
62.90
39.00
22.00
24.40
4.80
3.60
1.60
9.60
12.00
21.70
16.20
3.20
1.60
3.60
304. 14 .


(2) Equivalent Population
(V\ Tntal nf Proiect Sections 1. 2 & 3

Adiusted to $16,815
, 000
Project Sections
Division of Net
Cost
$ 4, 334,489. 16
4, 265,401.89
1, 281,569.61
993,754.82
1, 247, 300.81
96,942.27
178,871.86
46, 303.61
428,530.26
831,624. 57
1,476,958.80
1, 102,566.62
217, 759.84
67,904.96
245,020.92
$16, 815,000.00


1, 2 & 3
Cost
%
25. 777
25.367
7.622
5.910
7. 418
0.576
1.064
0.275
2. 548
4.946
8. 784
6.557
1.295
0.404
1.457
100. 000


MUNICIPALITIES
SUMMARY
                           PROJECT SECTIONS 1,
      EXHIBIT "B"
      Sheet 1 of 4

-------
                                      DIVISION OF COST
ROUGE VALLEY SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
ESTIMATED POPULATION AND MAXIMUM RATE OF SEWAGE FLOW


Municipality
Type
City
/
Twp.
Twp.
f
Twp.
City
City
City
Twp.
Twp.
Twp.
Village
City
Twp.
City
Twp.

Name
Livonia
Nankin
Redford
Dearborn (N)
Garden City
Plymouth
North ville
North ville
Plymouth
Canton
Inkster
Wayne
Van Buren (N)
Detroit (for D. H. O. C. )
Romulus (NW)
TOTALS:
Ult. Pop.
to
Interceptor
192,350
(1) 154,000
80, 000
55,000
50,000
12,000
9,000
(1) 4,000*
(1) 24,000 *
30,000 *
50. 000
39. 000
8, 000 *
(2) 4, 000
9.000
720, 350

Total
c.f. s.
77.94
62.90
39.00
22.00
24.40
4.80
3.60
1.60
9.60
12.00
21.70
16.20
3.20
1.60
3.60
304.14
Exist.
Conn, to
Detroit
25.47
4.78
26.10
10.65
9.63
4.13
1.50
1.16
4.72
0.61
-
-
-
0.84
-
89.59


Division of New Facilities
C.f. 8.
52.47
58.12
12.90
11.35
14.77
0.67
2.10
0.44
4.88
11.39
21.70
16.20
3.20
0.76
3.60
214.55
Cost
$1,663,080.02
1,842, 196.65
408,899.13
359,764-16
468,167.27
21,214.06
66,558.19
13,924.00
154,694.95
361,003.47
687,816.60
513,438.50
101,404.65
24,088.87
114,089.35
$6,800,339.87
  * Part of Ultimate
(1)  Except Institutions
(2)  Equivalent Population
  MUNICIPALITIES
PROJECT SECTION 1
                                          EXHIBIT "B"
                                          Sheet 2 of 4

-------
                                            DIVISION OF COST
ROUGE VALLEY SEWAGE DISPOSAL
SYSTEM

ESTIMATED POPULATION AND MAXIMUM RATE OF SEWAGE FLOW


Municipality
Type
Twp.
Village
City
Twp.
Twp.
Twp

Name
Nankin (S) (1)
Inkster
Wayne
Canton (S)
Van Buren (N)
Romulus (NW)
TOTALS:
Ult. Pop.
to
Interceptor
75.000
50,000
39,000
15,000 *
8,000 *
9,000
196,000


c.f. s./lOOO
0.4
28.80
13.2
13.20
6.0
3.20
3.60
68.00
0.5
1.50
8.50
3.00
-
-
13.00


Division of New Facilities
c.f. s.
30.30
21.70
16.20
6.00
3.20
3.60
81.00
Cost
$1,101,976.53
789, 204. 31
589.174.48
218,215.14
116,364.35
130,941.87
$2,945.876.68
 *   Part pf Ultimate
(1)   Except Institutions (Eloise)
                                                EXHIBIT "B"
                                                Sheet 3 of 4
                                                                                   MUNICIPALITIES
                                                                                PROJECT SECTION 2

-------
                                         DIVISION OF COST
ROUGE
VALLEY SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
ESTIMATED POPULATION AND MAXIMUM
Municipality
Type
City
Twp.
Twp.
Twp.
City
City
City
Twp.
Twp.
Twp.
City


Name
Livonia
Nankin (N)
Redford
Dearborn (N)
Garden City
Plymouth
Northville
North ville
Plymouth
Canton (N)
Detroit
(for D. H. 0. C. )
TOTALS:
Ult. Pop.
to
Interceptor
192,
79,
80,
55,
50,
12.
9,
(D 4,
(1) 24,
15,

(2) 4,
524,
350
000
000
000
000
000
000
000 *
000 *
000 *

000
350
C.f. 8.
0.4
72.94
27.60
4.00
22.00
2.40
4.80
3.60
1.60
9.60
6.00

1.60
156.14
/1 000
0.5
5.0
5. 0
35.0
-
22.00
-
-
-
-
-

-
67.00
Total
C.f. S.
77.94
32.60
39.00
22.00
24.40
4.80
3.60
1.60
9.60
6.00

1.60
223.14
RATE OF SEWAGE FLOW
Credit
Exist.
$
1,089,443.25
204, 686. 95
1, 116, 133.84
455,554.61
411, 726. 16
176,456.04
63, 986. 43
49,685.91
201,835.79
26, 172.43

35,871.09
3, 831, 552.50
M. R. I.
C.f. S.
19.41
3.65
19.88
8.11
7.33
3.14
1.14
0.89
3.60
0.47

0.64 .
68.26
Divisions of
New Facilities
C.f. S.
58.53
28.95
19.12
13.89
17.07
1.66
2.46
0.71
6.00
5.53

0.96
154.88
Cost
2,671,
1.321,
872,
634,
779,
75,
112,
32,
273,
252,

43,
7,069,
591.41
408.07
724.37
032.45
185.99
732. 28
321.19
381.56
853.33
440. 93

818.94
490.52
  *  Part of Ultimate
(1)   Except Institutions
(2)   Equivalent Population
  MUNICIPALITIES
PROJECT SECTION 3
                                            EXHIBIT "B"
                                            Sheet 4 of 4

-------
              DIVISION OF COST
ROUGE VALLEY SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM
ESTIMATED Pg


Wayne Co.
Gen. Hosp.
& Infirm, at
Eloise
Nankin Twp. )
Mich. State
rlosp. in
Northville Twp
Plymouth State
rlome & Train.
School in North
ville Twp.
Other Contrib.
incl. Mayberry
San. & Wayne
Co. Train. Sch
Reserves
EXHIBIT "C"
TOTALS
Exhibit "B"
Adjust. Totals
Project Totals
PROJECT SECTION 1
Exist.
c.f. s.
M.R.I
-
0.43
0.37
4. 11
4.91
89.59
94. 50
New Facilities
, c.f. s
6.0
1. 77
0. 31
-
7.37
15.45
214.55
230.00
Cost
$ 190,197.51
$ 56,101.72
$ 9.825.72
-
$ 233,875.12
$ 490,000.07
$6, 800,053. 93
$7, 290, 054. 00
PULATION AND MAXIMUM RATE OF SEWAGE FLOW
PROJECT SECT. 2
New Facilities
c.S.s
6.00
-
-
-
0.90
6.90
81.00
87.90
Cost
$ 218,215.14
-
-
-
$ 32,855.05
$ 251,070.19
$2,945, 752.81
$3, 196, 823.00
PROJECT SECTION 3
Sxist.
c. f. s.
M. R; I,
-
0.33
0.28
3.13
-
3.74
68.26
72.00
New Facilities
.c.f. s.
-
1.87
0.40
-
7.45
9.72
154.88
164. 60
Cost
-
$ 85,355.65
$ 18,257.89
-
$ 340,316.20
$ 443,929.74
$7, 069, 193. 26
$7, 513. 123.00
SUMMARY
Cost %
$ 408,412.65
$ 141,457.37
$ 28,083.61
-
$ 607,046.37
$ 1, 185, 000. 00
$16, 815, 000.00
$18. 000, 000.00
34.465
11.937
2. 370
-
51.228
100.000
100.000
100.000
                                     CONTRIBUTIONS, INSTITUTIONS,
                                     	AND RESERVE	
                                     PROJECT SECTIONS 1, 2, and 3
           EXHIBIT "C"
           Sheet 1 of 1

-------
                                                     Se/tveo
M'////"/•'//;,//•'/,. '/////////A'/- 7//A. A
                               e a THUS -\       /[•'.///.,
                               :'/////-,A'/^//^A"
                                                                      —S3. ft
                                        Pi-ut-rs/j
                                        P3-O2-PS/2
                                                a;
                             P£-O/-j°S .
                                      •^            ' ^                           l»t>» » H»H»»H«
                                       I
                                                                                 /»/• 02-,'S4
        OESCG.IPTIO/V  of
                             To
                                                                             -PS IU
                                                                                 P2-PS6
      V-IL L C
 £ c
74V LOO.
    KJ*s
     ^ sfc.2, sees. 3-10
     '/! sec.ii t
    /j sees.
                                                                                                   3
                                                                                                   2
                                                                                             MAT  I  IMrEe.C£f>Tog.S
 5 'our
           rt
P • CONr*./ICT
O • OIViMOM of AIA T
?s » fAojecr secr/o*/
        04t.li.
  (SOUTH of Sr
                                   OF c/rr .st G
                                         of  ;
                                                                 A/f 4 p
                               &UIZEAJ
                             (Sec. /j-3<
                                                         SEWAGE    DISPOSAL    SYSTEM
                      :<:
                      1 '
                      •

-------
DOWN RIVER
SEWAGE DISPOSAL
DIVISION OF
SYSTEM. COUNTY OF WAYNE, MICHIGAN
COST AND ALLOCATION
OF CAPACITY

3/1/62
PART ONE - SUMMARY
Division 2
Interceptor
Area
Van Bur en Twp. (S)
Belleville
Romulus Twp.
Taylor Twp.
Dearborn Twp.(S)
Southgate
Allen Park (S & SW)
Lincoln Park
Ecorse
River Rouge
Wyandotte
Brownstown (N)

Pop,
13,000*
7,000
106,000*
170,000
25,000
40,000**
40,000
55,000
21,000
22,000


36,000*
535,000
c.f.s.
5.2
2,8
42.4
68.0
10.0
16.0**
19.2
27.5
10.5
11.0


14.4
227.0
Division 1
Disposal Plant
Pop.
13,000*
7,000
55,000*
117,500*
25,000
55,000
40,000
55,000
21,000
22,000
47,000
2,500
460,000
c.f.s.
5.2
2.8
22.0
47.0
10.0
23.5
19.2
27.5
10.5
11.0
23.5
1.0
203.2
Division One
Project Section 1
Cost
$ 140,656.82
75,742.51
595,111.90
1,271,352.94
270,485.42
635,676.47
519,369.39
743,903.62
284,006.94
297,528.47
635,676.47
27,043.05
$5,496,554.00
%
2.559
1.378
10.827
23.130
4.921
11.565
9.449
13.534
5.167
5.413
11.565
0.492
100.000
Division Two
Project Sec. 2, 3 & 4
Cost
$ 263,256.94
141,710.48
2,146,507.38
3,442,490.80
506,274.54
809,996.76**
372,015.57
432,917.87
165,294.78
173,162.98


119,817.90
%
3.071
1.653
25.037
40.153
5.905
9.448**
4.339
5.049
1.928
2.020


1.397
$8,573,446.00 100.000
Part One
Combined

2.871
1.545
19.486
33,503
5.521
10.275
6.335
8.364
3.193
3.345
4.518
1.044
100.000
* Part of Ultimate
** Southgate (W)
                 PROJECT SECTION 5
                    Division of Cost

                    Capacity Allocation
                 PROJECT SECTION 6
                     Division of Cost
                     Capacity Allocation
    PART TWO - SUMMARY
- Estimated Cost of Interceptors
- Romulus  Township - 49. 122%
- Taylor Township   - 50.878%
- Romulus  Township - 41.4 c.f.s.
- Taylor Township   - 16.3 c.f.s.

- Estimated Cost of Interceptors
                    $1,442,000.00
                   ~$"698,517.50
                       723,482.50
                    $  778,000.00
- Taylor Township
- City of Southgate
- Taylor Township
- City of Southgate
- 72.727%
- 27.273%
- 13.0 c.f.s.
-  4.88 c.f. s.
$
565,816.00
212,184.00
                                           PART THREE  - SUMMARY
Estimated Cost of Interceptors = $2,000,000 - Division of Cost Romulus Township = 100%
                                                                                                          EXHIBIT "B1
 6PO 82O8I9—B-24

-------
                                                                    /oooo- g.
                                                                       rf

                                                                       -
NORTHEAST  SEWAGE  DISPOSAL  SYSTEM      EXHIBIT A-2

-------
PROPOSED SYSTEM;   The existing system is to be further improved by the
                        installation of a peak flow booster station, at the Wayne-
Macoinb County line,  to provide for a hydraulic gradient flow of 102 c. f. s. from
Macomb County.  Combined with the booster station installation, a submerged
electric flow meter and control and backwater gate unit is to be constructed, to
assure control of flows to those  agreed upon.   This will  allow the Macomb County
communities to correct any interceptor deficiencies.

          At the existing Grosse Pointe Farms Pumping Station, the present
pumps will be replaced to provide for pumping a peak sewage flow of 127 c. f. s.
Three pumping units of equal capacity will be installed at each of the pumping
stations; two of these pumps to handle the design flow, with the third unit" in
reserve.

          The proposed system will serve an estimated  population and design
flow requirements to provide adequate sewage service for the Northeast Sew-
age Disposal System as follows:

                                             I960        	Built-Up	
   Municipality                           U. S. Census   Population     c. f. s.
   Roseville *                               50,195         80,000
   East Detroit                              45,756         46, 000
   St. Clair Shores                          76,657         80, OOP
       Total-South Macomb Sanitary Dist.   172. 608        206, OOP
   Grosse Pointe Woods                     18,580         23,000
   Harper Woods                            19,995         21,000
   Grosse Pointe Shores                      2, 192         5, OOP
       Total-Wayne County                   40,767         49, PPP

       Total-Northeast System             213, 375        255, PPP
   Unallocated Flow                                                    	
       Total Available Capacity into Detroit System                       127. 0
   * Roseville's  recently annexed Erin Township area is included in the above
     estimates.

ESTIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST;    The estimated cost of the proposed facili-
                                       ties is as follows:

   Site or Right of Way                       $ 11, 000. PP
   Construction (labor, materials,  etc.)        306, OPP. 00
   Machinery & Equipment (installed)           324, OPO. OP      $641, POO. 00

   Plans and Specifications                                         15, 750. 00
   Engineering and Supervision                                     25, 200. 00
   Contingencies (Construction)                                     41,751.00
   Financial and Legal Expense                                      3, 337. 00
   Flowage Rights                                                 72, 962. 00
                                                                $800, 000. 00

              Construction bids were taken on April  4,  1961, and are within the
   engineers' estimate.

METHOD OF FINANCING TOTAL PROJECT:

   Wayne County Northeast Sewage  Disposal System Revenue Bds. $582, 000. 00
   Federal Grant under Public Law 660                           218, 000.00
                                                                $800, OPP. PO

-------
                                                        450
                                               SECTION 5
                   PI3TUBE DEVELOPMENTS
A.  Detroit to Construct Interceptors Outside City Limits
    Recently the Corporation Counsel ruled that Detroit can
    legally construct interceptors outside the city limits.
    Negotiations are underway for Detroit to construct the
    Dequindre interceptor to serve the Southeastern Oakland
    County Sewage Disposal District.  The Detroit Department
    of Water Supply can  obtain  the necessary financing at
    lower interest rates.  Thus a precedent is set whereby
    the area-wide sewage treatment problem can be solved
    and pollution abated.
B.  Water Main Construction Precedent;
    Since 1956, the Detroit Department of Water Supply has
    financed and constructed water transmission mains to
    suburban areas  in three counties.  The  service area
    has been and is continuing  to be expanded to any com-
    munity  in the metropolitan  area  that desires water.  To
    date, approximately 3,200,000 people in Detroit and 52
    suburban communities,  about 4l per cent  of the population
    of Michigan, are  receiving  water from Detroit.  Contract
    negotiations have been or  are  being  concluded with  sev-
    eral  other  suburbs. The area-wide water problem  has been
    solved.
 C.  National Sanitation Foundation and Sanitation Council

-------
                                                    451



Michigan, Six County Sewerage and Drainage Study



History;



The Supervisors Inter-County Committee represents the



six Southeastern Michigan Counties of Maoomb, Monroe,



Oakland, St. Glair, Washtenaw and Wayne, which consti-



tute the Detroit metropolitan area.



It covers 4,000 square miles and has a population of



4,200,000.



It was realized that this rapidly expanding area faced



public health and growth problems such as water supply,



sewerage, storm drainage and flood control.  It was also



realized that this was the responsibility of government



and industry alike.



On January  19 » 1956, the Supervisors Inter-County Com-



mittee requested the National Sanitation Foundation to



conduct an  Inter-County Water, Sewerage and Drainage



Survey of the Detroit metropolitan area.



Water Study;



On March 28, 1957* the report on the future water supply



was submitted and accepted.  It recommended that the



city of Detroit become the central water authority for



the area, and that facilities be developed to supply



a population of over 6,000,000 people, preferable with



an intake in Lake Huron.  The Detroit Water Board ac-



cepted these recommendations and has started developing

-------
                                                    452
them.  Thus  the future water needs In the six county
area are being taken care of today.
Sewerage and Drainage Study;
To facilitate the Sewerage and Drainage Study, a Sani-
tation Council for Southeastern Michigan was formed.  It
consists of about 50 members from government and in-
dustry and includes representatives of the Unites States
Public Health Service, Michigan Department of Health
and Michigan Water Resources Commission.  A six-man
Executive Committee was selected together with a
Chairman and Secretary.
Budget;
It is estimated that this study will require two years.
A budget of $305,000 has been approved to cover this
period.
The budget has been derived from the following sources:
1)  United States Public Health Service - $100,000
    grant under the Public Law No. 660 - The Federal
    Water Pollution Control Act
2)  Industries in the Detroit Metropolitan Area - $105,000
3)  Government, Cities and Counties - $100,000
Air Survey;
The Detroit Edison Company has flown an aerial survey
of the area at an estimated cost of $20,000 which is
not part of the budget.

-------
                                                     453
 Engineering Board Selected ;
 The Technical Committee of the Sanitation Council
 with the approval of the Executive Committee selected
 the following Board of Consultants.
      Dr. Abel Wolman, Chairman, of Baltimore
      Mr. Albert Roth of Hubbel, Roth and Clark,
           Birmingham
      Mr. Louis Ayres of Ayres, Lewis, Norris
           and May, Ann Arbor
 Scope of Job:
 It was realized that the only way to solve the area-wide
 sewerage and drainage problem was to develop a coordi-
nated plan.  It was also recognized that the longer noth-
 ing was done the more expensive it would become later.
 The area-wide water problem was solved first, and the
 metropolitan sewerage and drainage problem is to be
 solved next.  The needs must be defined first then steps
 taken for their solution.
 The study is to be pursued in four broad areas as follows
 1)  Determination of future needs
 2)  Determination of technical standards
 3)  Delineation of a Master Plan
 4)  Cost Estimates
 l)  Determination of Future Needs;
     a)  Preparation of a plan showing the existing and

-------
                                                   454



        programmed sewerage and  drainage  system



    b)  A study of the demography of the  area  to deter-



        mine the forecast population and  urban develop-



        ment.



    c)  Determination of the future capacity requirements



        for both sewerage and drainage



2)  Determination of Technical Standards:



    The delineation of a master plan will require  the



    following basic technical factors:



    a)  System to be used, separate or combined



    b)  Need for storm water treatment



    o)  Treatment process to be used, primary, inter-



        mediate or complete



    d)  Adoption of a unified or multiple system oper-



        ation



3)  Delineation of a Master Plan:



    a)  Ultimate objectives



        (l)  Sewerage and drainage  system



        (2)  Sewage treatment process and facilities




    b)  Initial program



        (1)  Sewerage and drainage  system



        (2)  Sewage treatment facilities




    c)  Intermediate programs



        (l)  Sewerage and drainage  system



        (2)  Sewage treatment facilities

-------
                                                    455
4)  Cost Estimates
This study Is unique In that it Is the first time a
cooperative financial agreement on the part of govern-
ment and Industry has been arrived at to help solve
metropolitan area problems.  A practical, well-planned,
long-range solution will result which will enable the
continued, orderly, economic growth of the Detroit
metropolitan area.
      (The Exhibits of Section 5 are as follows;)

-------
                                                     Exhibit 5,1







                      FETANCIAL  SUPPORT





               Six-County Sewerage and Drainage Study








Required                                           	    $305,000






Pledged to Date




    From Business  - Approximately                 —    $ 60,000



          (Partial List Attached)






    From Federal Government - United States



           Public Health Service                     —    $100,000



           (Order Attached)






    From Local Government - Water Department



           and County                               —    $100,000
               Firm Appropriation                  —    $260,000

-------
COMPANY
The Detroit fid'Jen
The Geoexal Mocoxs Corporation
Tbe Ford Wotor Gar Company
                                      AJLLOCATION

                                      $ 20,000.00


                                        13.UOO.00
                                         10,000.00

                                          5,000.00

                                          3,000.00

                                          1.500.00

                                          1,600.00

                                          1,200.00
Michigan Sell Telephone Compaay

l&ciiigan Consolidated Ge* Company

National BaaJc of Detroit

Tbc Detroit Bank * Trust Company

The j. L. Hudson Company

Manufacturers Natloaftl Bank

The Evening Hew» Aesociatioc (Detroit I^^vs) 1,000.00

The Detroit Free Press


Tbe JJeodlx Corpoaukm                       750.00

Tfe Frito Company                          300.00

Jooe« & LaugUia Steel Corpora'doa             300.00

Aigoaac Divisioa, Girts-Cralt Corporatiau     200.00

A. M. T. OoiporaUott                       100.'JO

A. & P. Food Stores                         100.00

          Aggregates Corporatioa             100.00

           tajuJard Industrial XHvisiou         100.00

Asa Axt»r Bank                              100.CJO
                                                                  Exhibit 5.2
    aerial photography done
thet la oeceeaar; for this
type of voc&.

       .  Pxomiaed dteck
      be available to CM? tibia
raooth.

Indicated tbat tf the General
Motor* Corp* pledged funds,
so would they.

To be allocated later.
To be allocated later.

Over 3-year period

Over S-ytar period

Qrer 3-year period
                                                                     , butcrffered
                                                         columa support".

-------
                                         AJLLQCATIOM
Fraakita Mortgage Corporation              $100.00




J . A . Waclvor Lumber Company               100.00




        Mortgage Corporation                100.00
fctoxtoa S«U Company                         1DQ.OQ



reexi«e» Cement Coaopsay                    100.00




S««i Pftper Company - Decroii Di?i«laa         100. 00




&. L. Sp4tzl«y Oettiog Comp*ay               100.00



BUae & i-aughUa                              50.00



Tbe CommcrcUJ 4i i>a\ofl^ Baa4c of St. Ctair     35.00
     others have given us tbclt verbal c
-------
                                                                JExttbit 8.3
          DfcPARTMINT OF HEAITH, EDUCATION. AND  WElPAtt
                         Public HMI* S«rvic«
                        Burt*v «f St«t« $*ryic*»
                                   25. D. C.
      AWMD
                                                    GMMt
  •Aft
      2-26-62
                                                Mo.
                       NOTIFICATION OF AWARD
               WATER SUPPLY AND POLLUTION CONTROL
                   DEMONSTRATION PROJECT GRANT

 Tho grant dotcrlbod bolow hoi boon opprovod.

 Till* of Projoctr  Detroit Metropolitan Environnnntal Study
 Awarded lot National Sanitation  Foundation,  Ann Arbor, Michigan

              PM)«e» Dfractorr   Poy*« (Chock will to aVawn to):
 Hoary P. Vaughan
 Proaidant
 Rational Sanitation Foundation
 Hichi«an School of Public  Haalth
 Ann Arbor, Michigan
      *altar r. Snydorft CNtCMtlvo-flirooti
      SacrataryTroaauror
      Tha National Sanitation foundation
      Michigan School of Public KM 1th
      Ann Arbor, Michigan
 Grant Ported: H-1-62/3-31-5 3

 Total Gronh  $23,000

            :  $S,000

        Duo: SIS,000
 Future Support (Tontorlvoty opprovod
 »ubjact to ovailobillry of fundi and
 ftuccottful dovolopmonf of nSo pro{oct)f

 Ut Additional Yoor?  $MD,000

2nd Additional Yoort  $«*0,000
    cv Sfcafomonh   Tho ottaehod oxplonoHon owtllnot tho policy foJoHvo
  fo Domomtrotlofi Granta In wator wpply ond pollution control ond ony
  odditlom applyinf to thli oword.  (To bo auppliod)

Acknowlodflomont:  Tho Projoct Oiroctor is roquirod tor (I)  ocknowlodgo
  occopfonco of tho o/ont oword, ond (2)  odvlio ol ony chongo In tho
  starting, dato. Addross  lottor to Chlof, Rosoorch ond Tmlnlng Gran*
  Branch, ond rofor to grant numbor obova.

-------
                                                        456
                                               SECTION 6
           UNITED STATES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
                        VERSUS
       NATIONAL SANITATION FOUNDATION - SANITATION
        COUNCIL FOR SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN STUDY

          The United States Public Health Service is to
assist the State of Michigan  In identifying and recommending
methods for correcting pollution of the Detroit River and
Lake Erie.  The Michigan waters of Lake St. Glair, Detroit
River and Lake Erie extending to the Michigan-Ohio State
line and the river basins of  the Clinton, Rouge, Huron and
Raisin Rivers are within the  scope of this study.
          Two studies  in the  same area are not realistic and
are a waste of funds.  The united States Public Health
Service would be financing two  studies in the  same area to
accomplish the same aims.
          The National Sanitation Foundation-Sanitation
Council study is the  one preferred to do the job for the
following reasons:
               A.  The study  is already underway.  Nationally
          known consultants have been engaged, financing is
          nearly completed and  governmental and industrial
          leaders are  interested in and willing to get the
          present and  long-range sewerage and  drainage

-------
                                              457
problem in the area solved.
     B.  This study is more inclusive.  It will
develop long-range plans and means for solving
the sewerage and drainage problems.  It will
present a plan for the orderly and systematic
development and costs of the facilities necessary.
It will cover a larger area, extending north to
Port Huron, south to the Ohio border and west to
the far border of Washtenair  County.  It will not
be limited by state or international boundaries
and hence will have metropolitan area, inter-state
and International scope.
     C.  More constructiveness will be accomplished
through willingness and cooperative effort than
through threats and court action.
     D.  Two studies in the same area are not
realistic.
     £.  Technical standards should not be changed
now for the following reasons:
         1.  The area should first be brought up
             to Detroit standards.
         2.  Communities under contract are willing
             to pay for treatment under the present
             definition.  Any changes in treatment
             should be gradual as some communities

-------
                                     458
    oannot pay more and others are un-
    willing to pay and may rebel and
    cause lawsuits.  This would tie up
    financing and all progress would cease,
3.  Canadian Situation:
    a) There are no sewage treatment
       plants on the Canadian side of
       Lake St. Clair and the Detroit
       River.  The only sewage treatment
       plant on the Canadian side of the
       St. Clair River is at Sarnia,
       which was placed in operation last
       year.  Thus raw sewage and industrial
       wastes from a sizeable population
       including Windsor and its suburbs,
       Chatham, Wallaceburg and Ammherst-
       burg, as well as many smaller com-
       munities, enter the river.
       In contrast, every city and  town
       on the American side has a sewage
       treatment plant.
   b)  There is no storm flow treatment
       on the Canadian shore.
   c)  The expanding  oil and  petroohemica]
       industry at  Sarnia are releasing

-------
                                                        459
                          continuous flows of industrial
                          wastes, along with occasional
                          slugs of high concentrations.

          MR. REMUS:  For the Court's benefit now I have
several statements that I would like to add because they
are not in our record, at least not as directly as I would
like them there.
          One is that all developments of our sewage system
have been approved by the State health officials and meet
the State requirements as far as performance is concerned.
          The second statement refers to Mr. Klttrell's
report when he mentioned 1»24 parts per million gallons
in 1946 of phenol deposits that have been reduced to 1.O4.
To correct Mr, Kittre11, Trenton gets their water from the
Detroit system.  I think he will appreciate that.
          The International Joint Commission balance of
2400 parts MPN cannot be maintained at our plant because
the river count above our plant effluent is equal to that
and, therefore, there is no room at all.
          5.  I would refer to the charts that were shown
yesterday which showed Detroit's suspended solids with a
very large circle, and Wyandotte's with a little less, and
Dearborn also on the bacterial count.  That was Detroit
and 4? communities, including more than 300 square miles
                                                   GPO 820818—B-23

-------
                                                        460
 and  it  does not adequately reflect the fact that Detroit's
 basic  sewage system per capita performance is as good  as
 any.
           Further, I would like to refer to Mr.  Kittrell's
 report  where he stated yesterday, and we agree with him,
 that 99 percent of the bacteria in the area that gets  in the
 Detroit River will be killed after the Rouge River has been
 taken care of.  I would like to point out what it  would cost
 to eliminate that last one percent.  For Detroit,  alone,
 if you  are going to  take the storm flow control to take that
 portion out, it would be in excess of $400 million.
           Just visualize what is added to that by  the  addi-
 tional  areas,  and there is just no financing base  for  that
 in existence.
           Also I would like to point  out  it  would  be unwise
 to go beyond that one percent; at this time because  if we
 do we should also have the Canadian situation under control,
 and  they do  not  yet  have their sewage plants.  To get  100
percent we would  have to eliminate the sewage  from or, to
put  sewage treatment  in plants on 200,000 boats  and put
diapers on 29,000,OOO ducks,  and  would have  to eliminate
 sea gulls and  get  the oats and  dogs off the  streets, and
as to the other fur bearing animals their wastes would have
to be eliminated as well  as that  of the people.
          I think  it  should be  remembered  in here that this

-------
                                                        461



is for the benefit of the human race in part.



          I have only one further comment.  It has been our



experience that those areas that have complained the most



In recent months are the ones that have the most reason to



do something, but point their fingers the hardest in other



directions.



          Thank you.



          (Applause)



          THE CHAIRMAN:  Thank you.  Are there any comments



or questions?  I would like to point out just one thing on



the record here.  This is a really very effective and



beautiful picture you have of the Rouge  at its confluence



with the Detroit River.  I know that our black and white



process is not going to do justice to it, though, and I



hope you will not be disappointed when you see it in the



transcript.



          MR. REMUS:   Yes.  Since you mentioned the picture,



however, I would like, if you or anyone here Is interested



enough to take a look at it, to say that we had a slide here



but the projector disappeared today.  It is colored film



and shows the Rouge River and the Detroit sewage plant out-



fall and waste that comes down the American shore of the



Detroit River.  There are several factors that are in there.



Obviously the biggest gob of waste, by a wide margin, in



this is the Rouge River.

-------
                                                        462
          Secondly, that Detroit outfall, the sum total of
that,mind you now, Is between 2,600,000 and 3,000,000 people.
It is not just one little stream or representing one little
community.  That Is Detroit and 4? adjacent communities.
There are 3,000,000 people in the area, but they do not yet
get all their service.  3,100,000.
          Also, on the upriver part, above the outfall, the
situation is such that we have felt In our treatment practices
that unless we wanted to pump the river in we were a little
foolish to waste money doing it a great deal more than the
way the river was.
          The moral of this is simple:  If we waste $1 for
chlorine it means that many dollars we haven't got for build-
ing something; and the building is the most important thing
in our estimation at this time.
          THE CHAIRMAN:  Dr. Heustis.
          DR. HEUSTIS:  I would like to call on Mr. Jim
Davey of the Wayne County Road Commission at this time.
Do you have a prepared statement?
          STATEMENT OF JAMES M. DAVEY, MANAGING DIRECTOR
          BOARD OF WAYNE COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONERS
          MR. DAVEY:  I do.
          The county of Wayne is vitally interested in the
elimination or prevention of pollution in the Detroit River
and Lake Erie.  This interest is emphasized by the fact that

-------
                                                        463



we have under construction, scheduled for completion in 1963,



a new water treatment plant and a system of major trans-



mission mains, which will cost approximately 50 million dol-



lars.  Since the intake for raw water to serve this system is



located in the vicinity of Fighting Island in the Detroit



River, it is axiomatic that this source of raw water should



be reasonably free of contaminanoe.  In recognition of this



fact, and in compliance with the mandate of the Michigan State



Health Department, Wayne County has proceeded to correct ex-



isting deficiencies in the sewer system and treatment plants



over which it has Jurisdiction.  This then is our purpose:



          To preserve the public health and assure greater



economic development by modernization of our sewage and



sewerage system, and, at the same time, preserve a source



of potable water in the Detroit River to serve the affected



communities.



          Wayne County today is in the midst of three major



sewer expansion projects totalling more than 37 million dol-



lars.  These projects are part of an expertly conceived mastei



plan designed to solve all the present and future needs of



the county,.   It is true that the county's economic develop-



ment has suffered in the past few years due to a lack of



capacity in both transmission and treatment.  This economic



pale was caused by an overloading of sewerage systems in



portions of the county resulting in a State Health Department

-------
                                                        464
 Construotion ban.  However,  through community, governmental
 and citizen cooperation,  this  distressing problem has been
 solved.
          Making use  of its  master  plan for development,
 the county has  implemented construction projects in the
 Northeast, Rouge Valley and  Downriver Districts.  The
 present projects in the Rouge  Valley and Downriver Districts
 provide for the development  of the  area up to the maximum
 capacity of the present projects.
          The master  plan provides  for the ultimate growth
 and development of Wayne  County.  I know that a discussion
 of sewers lacks general public appeal.  However, the re-
 sults obtained  through well  planned, well constructed and
 efficiently operated  sewer system are dramatic.  Community
 health and well being lead the list  of these results.  Fol-
 lowing this is  economic growth and  development.
          An adequate sewer  system presents with it both
 industrial and  economic development.  This is already taking
 place in the Rouge Valley District where a building boom is
 being experienced.  The same activity is expected for the
 Downriver District this spring.
          Indeed, it  is our  position summarily stated, that
 all sources of  alleged pollution over which the Board of
 Wayne County Road Commissioners and the Wayne County Depart-
ment of Public  Works  exercises jurisdiction, have been cor-

-------
                                                        465
rected or are In the prooess of correct ion.  This would
Include work at the Wyandotte, Trenton and Grosse lie Plants.
          Mr. George Bingham, who will also appear as a
witness before this honorable committee, will supply a break-
down of our efforts in this regard and supplement my remarks.
          DR. HEUSTIS:  Thank you very much, and with the
Chairman^ permission we will hear from Mr. Bingham before
we have questions of Wayne County.
          These are the two representatives from Wayne
County that we have.
          STATEMENT OF GEORGE R. BINGHAM, SANITARY ENGINEER,
          WAYNE COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT
          OF PUBLIC WORKS, ON BEHALF OF THE COUNTY OF WAYNE,
          MICHIGAN
          MR. BINGHAM:  Since the mid-1930's Wayne County
has recognized the then present and the then future problems
confronting the county and its municipalities in regard to
the correction or elimination of deficiencies in the sewerage
systems serving the "out-county" area.  Prior to that time,
very little coordinated effort had been made to solve these
problems on an area basis and local Interests had approached
the solution to local problems without much regard to the
over-all problem of sewage collection and disposal and the
accompanying public health implications.
          By 1939» the county had completed and placed in

-------
                                                        466
service a $2,200,000 P.W.A. project which, while not com-
pletely satisfactory insofar as what was desirable, was a
means to accomplish the greatest benefit to the area served
and to the county with the money available.  Small, inef-
ficient treatment plants were abandoned, areas using septic
tanks were connected to sewerage systems, discharge of sewage
to streams was greatly reduced and the first steps toward a
solution to these problems on a metropolitan area basis were
taken.
          During World War II, very little additional work
was done, except for a project which provided five munici-
palities in the southeast part of Maoomb County and three
municipalities in northeast Wayne County with a connection
through the county project to the sewage disposal facilities
of the City of Detroit.  This project, while small in size
and cost was large in its effect upon the public health of
the entire metropolitan area in that it minimized discharges
of sewage into the recreational waters of Lake St. Glair which
in turn are upstream from water supply intakes serving al-
most 2,000,000 people.
          During the period just prior to the end of the war
and immediately following, the county completed plans for
the construction of facilities to supplement, augment and
extend the facilities previously constructed.  The work on
these projects was unable to proceed at that time because the

-------
                                                        46?



anticipated post-war slump in business activity and its



accompanying unemployment did not materialize.  The expected



continuation of federal participation in public works pro-



jects did not occur and the county, because of its limited



statutory ability to finance these projects was unable to



proceed.  The area continued to grow and the sewage disposal



problems increased.  In 1955* an extension to one of the



facilities, allowing two small sewage treatment plants to



be abandoned, was constructed by assessment under the Drain



Law.



          In 1956, the Board of Supervisors approved, in



principle, a report and recommendation for a county master-



plan project to correct remaining deficiencies in the ex-



isting system and to provide for the growth and development



of the entire "out-county" area.  The Board of County Road



Commissioners, as the county's agent, prepared a detailed



master plan together with a method of financing and pre-



sented it to the Board of Supervisors in 1958.  This pro-



ject, which proposed a $36 million program financed on a



revenue basis, was approved by the Board of Supervisors and



the accompanying revenue bond rate schedule was placed in



effect.  However, the Sewage Disposal and Water Supply Com-



mittee, sitting as a statutory board of review on rates,



cancelled the increase and left the project without a



method of financing.  The subsequent search for alternate

-------
                                                        468
financing methods led the county to establish a County De-
partment of Public Works to take advantage of certain fin-
ancing provisions of the D.P.W. Statute.  Utilizing person-
nel and available sewage disposal system funds provided by the
Road Commission, the D.P.W. has, in a period of about 30
months, prepared plans and negotiated agreements to accomplish
the financing of the much-needed improvement and expansion of
most of the county system facilities.  The Road Commission
has also proceeded to arrange financing of other work where
D.P.W. financing methods were not wholly suitable.  A brief
description of the county's accomplishments to date follows.
          Northeast District  Project cost $800,000,
                              Federal Grant $218,000.
          This project consists of expansion of pumping
facilities in leased space located in a sewage pumping sta-
tion owned by the City of Grosse Pointe Farms and the con-
struction of a metering and peak-flow booster station at the
county line.  In concept, this project changes the existing
interceptor from a strictly gravity sewer to a system which
operates as a pressure conduit during times of maximum flow,
at which time all areas served by this interceptor must pump
their flow into it.  The project assures the South Maoomb
Sanitary District of a fixed capacity and maximum hydraulic
gradient at the county line.  The project also provides
treatment service to the Milk River District located in

-------
                                                        469
Grosse Pointe Woods and Harper Woods in Wayne County.  The
Milk River Project oonslsts of a storm water pumping station
and a sett ling -skimming basin which can contain the flow
from small storms and the first rush of flow from large
storms*  Following each storm, the basin is de-watered into
the county system's sanitary interceptor and that flow is
transported to the Detroit system for treatment and disposal.
          Construction of this Northeast District project
was made possible by adding a charge of $9.00 per million
gallons to the regular charges for pumping and disposal,
and by marketing Wayne County Revenue Bonds.  The project
is under construction, completion date this summer.
          Rouge Valley District  Project cost $18,000,000.
          This area has been served from time to time by
municipally operated treatment plants, by county system
treatment plants and by sewage disposal service provided
by the City of Dearborn and the City of Detroit.  Almost
half of the total project cost is for "outlet" interceptors
which pass through the City of Dearborn, the City of Allen
Park, the City of Melvindale and the City of Detroit, but
do not serve these municipalities.  The City of Detroit
has agreed to receive the flow from this district into its
system at two locations, with 94.5 cubic feet per second
maximum at Ford Road and Southfield and 230 cubic feet per
second maximum at Fort Street and the Rouge River.

-------
                                                        470
The financing of this project has been achieved on the basis
of a contract between the county and 14 municipalities In
the district whereby each municipality has acquired a  guar-
anteed capacity in the system and has agreed to make annual
Interest and principal payments over the next 40 years.  All
of the work is under contract except the Rouge River Siphon
Structure which will be advertised for bids shortly.  Pro-
vision has also been made for this project to serve an area
within the Rouge Valley, but lying in Oakland County, In
order that the branches of the Rouge within the area served
by the county system may be kept free of pollution and suit-
able for the recreational uses of the flood-plain lands
now enjoyed by the people of the metropolitan area*  This
project Is sized, not for the ultimate capacity requirement
of the service area, but was limited in size by the flow
that the City of Detroit system was capable of receiving
for treatment.
          Down-River District  Project cost $18,270,000.
Federal Grant $373,500 (for part of project).
          As in the areas previously described, the Down-
River District Project augments, supplements and provides
relief for the system facilities which have been In service
for 23 years.  Part of the area is served by a sanitary
                                     i
interceptor which discharges into a system of combined
sewers and pumping station.  During dry weather, the system

-------
                                                         471
 performs satisfactorily, but during time of storm,  only a
 small part of the sanitary sewage from this interceptor is
 pumped by the sanitary sewage pumps at the pumping  station
 and reoelves treatment in the plant*  When the hydraulic
 gradient at the pumping station is high, the connection of
 the sanitary interceptor to the combined sewer is closed
 and the flow from the  interceptor is diverted to Ecorse
 Creek, or is pumped  to Ecorse Creek, the Rouge River or the
 Detroit River.   This not only is unsatisfactory from the
 standpoint of diversions, but creates operating problems
 at the treatment plant because of grit and low sludge content
 of the flow during times of storm and the excess sludge in
 the flow as combined sewer systems are de-watered following
 the storms.  The enlarged treatment plant will have  its own
 pumping station and  a  separate extension of the sanitary
 interceptor from the present point of connection to  the new
 pumping station will eliminate these overflows and discharges
 of sanitary sewage.  Additional parts of the project  will
 remove sanitary sewers from their present connections to
 combined  sewers, will  provide for relief of overloaded fa»-
QLlities and will remove the dependence upon septic tanks
 from most  areas now  served  by them and will allow the growth
 of the area to  benefit from the water filtration and  pumping
 station with its transmission mains all of which are  now
 under  construction.  The project will allow two treatment

-------
 Plants operated by the county system and one small plant
 operated by the City of Belleville to be abandoned and taken
 out of service.
           The county has made an offer to certain Washtenaw
 County communities, offering them the opportunity to Join
 with Wayne County in the construction of this project and
 to be served by this system on a permanent basis.  While
 no reply to this offer has been received, it has been reported
 that the City of Ypsilanti is proceeding to expand a treat-
 ment plant discharging effluent  to the Huron River.
           The cities of Trenton  and Riverview were included
 in previous drafts of the financing and disposal agreement,
 but refused to sign the contract, preferring instead  to
 build  their own small treatment  plants,  rather than to
 Join the  county system project.
           Since these projects could not  be  completed for
 at  least  18 months,  the  county is preparing  the  necessary
 facilities  to  serve  these  two municipalities until  they
 remove their flow  from the county system.  In the case of
Riverview and  the  north part  of Trenton,  these facilities
will consist of a  connection  from the present interceptor to
the new pumping station.  In  the  case of  the  area served by
the county  system's plant located  in Trenton and serving
the rest of Trenton and all of the City of Gibraltar, the
county system will temporarily expand the facilities at the

-------
                                                        473
plant.
          Flat Rook and Rockwood
          At Flat Rock, the plant will be expanded to approx-
imately twice its present.capacity, assisted by a $45,000
federal grant against a total cost of $153,000.  The balance
of the cost will be raised by selling $110,000 In revenue
bonds based upon an increase of six and a half cents per
thousand gallons of water used plus a $25 connection charge
for each new user.
          At Rookwood, the same type of increase in service
charge has been proposed to the Village in order that a sim-
ilar project might be undertaken for the county system's
plant at Rockwood.  The only difference between the two
would be that for the Rockwood project,no bonds would be
sold and the project would be constructed in stages, mostly
on a force-account basis, using funds advanced by the county
system and recovered from the increase in service charges.
          On Grosse lie, the county operates two small sew-
age disposal plants owned by and leased from the Township
of Grosse lie, one of which is a temporary facility, the
other being a permanent installation.  The necessary pro-
ceedings have taken place and easements and right-of-way
are now being acquired for the construction of a sewage dis-
posal plant and system of lateral sewers and interceptors
under the Drain law.

-------
           The present projects in the Rouge Valley and
 Down-River Districts provide for the development of the  area
 up to the maximum capacity of the present projects.  The
 ultimate growth and development of the rest of future metro-
 politan areas in the Rouge and Huron Valleys will be made
 possible by future projects which although part of the county's
 master plan,  are not yet even in the preliminary concept
 state — only the general location and faction of these  pro-
 jects have been set.
           The county has also established  a policy of approv-
 ing no new additional combined  sewer systems and  has limited
 approval of combined sewer extensions to those  areas now
 served by such systems.
           Wayne  County has recognized the  problem,  has
 prepared a master plan,  has prepared  and negotiatied  the
 necessary financing  agreements,  and has now reached  a point
 where  it  can  be  said  that  the  only thing that remains to be
 done  is  to complete  the  construction  of approximately $37
 million  worth  of  Improvements.  The next stage  in  the de-
 velopment  of the master  plan will  come in  approximately
 twenty years.  In  the interim, the metropolitan area can
 enjoy residential, commercial and  Industrial growth as a
 result of these projects, and diversion to the water-courses
 of untreated or inadequately treated  sewage will have been
greatly reduced, if not  entirely eliminated.

-------
          Thank you very much.



          (The Wayne County map attached  to the statement



of Mr. Bingham Is as follows:)
                                                  GPO 820819-B-26

-------
 PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
                                                        476
           THE CHAIRMAN:  Thank you.   Dr.  Heustis.
           DR. HEUSTIS:  The next  person that  I would  like to
 call would be from the Supervisors Inter-County Committee,
 and  as  I understand it Mr.  David  Calhoun  has  a very brief
 statement to present on their behalf.
           STATEMENT OF DAVID R. CAIHOUtt,   CHAIRMAN,
           PHYSICAL PLANNING COMMITTEE,  SUPERVISORS
           INTER-COUNTY COMMITTEE, MACOMB-MONROE-
           OAKLAND-ST.  CLAIR-WASHTENAW-WAYNE,  MICHIGAN
           MR. CALHOUN:  This is a very  general statement
 which I think: would be of Interest to all and that is why
 I would like to  read it.
           Secondly, as the  only elected official on the pro-
 gram, being the  Mayor  of my own town, I didn't want to leave
 without saying a few words.
           The Supervisors Inter-County  Committee as one of
 the  founders and supporters of the Sanitation Council of
 Southeastern Michigan, would like to  present  testimony con-
 cerning the action of  the Sanitation  Council  over the past
 two years concerning pollution in the lower Detroit River
 and Western Lake Erie.
           The Sanitation Council  of Southeastern Michigan was
 established  by action  of the S3x-County Supervisors Inter-
 County  Committee (Oakland-Mac omb-Wayne-St. C lair-Washtenaw-
Monroe)  for the  purpose  of  studying the sewerage problems

-------
                                                        477
(sanitary and storm) in the six-county area and the prepar-
ation of a Master Plan for an ultimate solution.
          The Sanitation Council of Southeastern Michigan
is under the direction of six sponsors:  1) Supervisors
Inter-County Committee, 2) Southeastern Michigan Metropolitan
Community Research Corporation, 3) National Sanitation Found-
ation, 4) Greater Detroit Board of Commerce, 5) Detroit Met-
ropolitan Area Regional Planning Commission, and 6) City of
Detroit.
          Preliminary discussions established the following
"Statement of Scope" for the proposed program.
          In order to guide the development of proper sewer-
age and drainage programs In the Six-County Area, the follow-
ing study will be required.
          The study should be pursued in four broad areas as
follows:
               1)  Determination of future needs
               2)  Determination of technical standards
               3)  Delineation of a Master Plan
               4)  Cost estimates,
DETERMINATION OF FUTURE NEEDS
          The determination of future needs will require in
general the following information:
               1)  Preparation of a plan showing the existing
                   and programmed sewerage and drainage system.

-------
                                                        478



               2)  A study of the demography of the area



                   to determine the forecast population and



                   urban development.



               3)  Determination of the future oapaolty



                   requirements flor both sewerage and drain-



                   age.



DETERMINATION OF TECHNICAL STANDARDS



          The delineation of a Master Plan for the Six-



County area will require Initially that the following basic



technical factors be established:



               1)  System to be used, Separate or Combined.



               2)  Need for storm water treatment,



               3)  Treatment process to be used, primary,



                   Intermediate, complete.



               4)  Adoption of a unified or multiple system



                   operation.



DELINEATION OF A MASTER PLAN



          The delineation of a Master Plan should be compre-



hensive to include the following information:



               1)  Ultimate Objectives as to:



                   a) Sewerage and drainage  system



                   b) Sewage treatment process and facilities*,



               2)  Initial Program



                   a) Sewerage and drainage  system



                   b) Sewage treatment facilities

-------
                                                        479
               3)  Intermediate Programs
                   a) Sewerage and  drainage system
                   b) Sewage treatment  facilities
COST ESTIMATES
          Cost estimates will of necessity have to be  made  on
the basis of preliminary and schematic  designs and also as
of a certain date.   Subsequent statements of cost will have
to take into consideration any fluctuation of the construction
cost Index.
          On the basis of the "Statement of Scope," the follow-
ing action has already been taken by the Sanitation Council
of Southeastern Michigan.
               1.  Mr. John R. Wilt, Manufacturers
                   National Bank, was appointed Chair-
                   man of the Executive Committee;
               2.  Mr. Clyde L. Palmer, City Engineer,
                   City of Detroit, was appointed Chair-
                   man of the Technical Committee;
               3.  The Technical Committee and the
                   Executive Committee  have selected
                   three consultants who will work with
                   the Technical Committee, namely,
                   Hubbe11, Roth, & Clark; Lewis,
                   Ayres, Norrls and May; and Abel
                   Wolman;

-------
                4.   A budget of $305,000 has  been
                    approved by the Executive Com-
                    mitteej
                5.   The Finance Committee has already
                    obtained commitments in the  fol-
                    lowing amounts:
           United States Public Health Service....$100,000
           Local Government	„....	100,000
           Industry.	  60,000
                6.   An aerial survey of the six-county
                    area has been made at a cost of
                    approximately $20,000 as  part of the
                    contribution of The Detroit Edison
                    Company.
          The Sanitation Council of Southeastern Michigan
expects that very shortly the  program will be fully imple-
mented and will be  completed  in two years.
          As shown  in the foregoing statements of fact, the
Sanitation Council  of Southeastern Michigan  is a well-planned
cooperative effort  between Government  and Industry which will
produce, for the foreseeable future,  a Master Plan to guide
the six-county area in the  orderly and proper programming
of its sewerage and  drainage construction to adequately meet
the developing needs of the area.
          The urgent  need for  a Master Plan cannot be over-

-------
                                                        481



 emphasized.  Considerable work has been done in the past



 both as to planning and oonstructlon.  At least $100,000,000



 worth of sewer construction is now under contract in the



 area and about the same amount is being prepared for adver-



 tising at an early date.  All this work will have significant



 bearing on the problem of pollution control in the entire



 area.  In addition, upon completion of a Master Plan, the



 consolidation of the various systems, both existing and



 future, into a unified system, will require additional cor.



 struction costing in the neighborhood of $500,000,000.



          In the opinion of the Chairman of the Technical



Committee of the Sanitation Council of Southeastern Michigan,



the superimposing of action by the Department of Health,



Education & Welfare in the area at this time may disturb



past and future efforts of the Sanitation Council of South-



eastern Michigan.



          THE CHAIRMAN:  Thank you.  Dr. Heustis.



          DR. HEUSTIS:  I would like to call Mr. Ken Hallen-



beck, of the Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority, who also



has an extremely brief statement to make.



          STATEMENT OF KENNETH L. HALLENBECK, DIRECTOR,



          THE HURON-CLINTON METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY,



          1750 GUARDIAN BUILDING, DETROIT 26, MICHIGAN



                           The following brief statement is



submitted to indicate our interest and concern in the above

-------
                                                        482
subject.
          This Authority was made possible by an enabling
act of the 1939 Michigan Legislature which permitted a refer-
endum in the general election of November, 19^0 in the counties
of Livingston, Macomb, Oakland, Washtenaw and Wayne.
          The voters of these five counties approved the
formation of the Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority and
directed that it proceed to acquire, develop and operate park
and recreational facilities for its people.
          The Authority has  since acquired, developed and
operated three major facilities:  Kensington Metropolitan Park,
consisting of 4,50O acres  on the  Huron River in Livingston
and Oakland Counties; Metropolitan Beach with 550 acres  on
Lake  St. Glair  in  Macomb County;  and  Lower Huron Metropolitan
Park,  a 2,000 acre area on the Huron River  in  Southern
Wayne  County.   A "more  recent major  facility  is  being de-
veloped on Stony Creek, a  tributary  of the  Clinton  River,
consisting of more than 3*000  acres,  in Macomb  and  Oakland
Counties.  Among the  important features of  these parks has
been  swimming.
          These ventures  along with smaller units  on the
Huron and  Clinton Rivers  were  used  as a basis  for  a recent
Park  Users  Survey conducted  by the  Detroit  Metropolitan Area
Regional  Planning Commission.
           This study indicated that the major activities that

-------
                                                        483



 attracted people to the regional parks in order of their



 preference were picnicking, rest-relaxation, and swimming.



 The survey in the Authority parks consisting of Kensington



 Park and Metropolitan Beach showed that swimming was the



 dominant attraction.



          Due to these findings and the emphasis placed on



 swimming and other water uses as a major attraction to



 Regional parks, the Authority finds itself concerned with



 the condition of waters in and bordering all of the above



 five counties and offer our continuing cooperation with



your office and all other agencies — national, state and



 local — toward a total abatement of water pollution.



          MR. MALLONEN:  Mr. Chairman, the statement is al-



ready made part of the record.



          DR. HEUSTIS:  That's right.



          MR. MALLONEN:  I would just like to make a short



addendum to it.



          DR. HEUSTIS:  All right.  For the record, or not



for the record?



          MR. MALLONEN:  For the record.



          DR. HEUSTIS:  Go ahead.



          STATEMENT OF EDWARD A. MALLONEN, REPRESENTING



          MR. KENNETH HALLENBECK, DIRECTOR, THE HURON-



          CLINTON METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY



          MR. MALLONEN:  This is merely a statement made in
                                                   . GPO 820819—B-2B

-------
                                                        484



the light of experiences had by the Michigan Conservation De-



partment at Sterling Monroe bathing beach.  It is the con-



sensus of the Authority that any displacement of any swimming



facility in the Greater Detroit Metropolitan Area can cause



burdensome loads on the facilities supported by the Authority}



suoh as at Metropolitan Beach, for example, which is in



Macomb County, or Lake St. Glair.  It can be described as



a bathing facility on Lake St. Clair near the mouth of the



Clinton River, and may be described as an expenditure of



about $8,000,000, catering to people in the metropolitan



area with an amount of about one and a half million annually.



          While this session is limited to Lake Erie and



the Detroit River, we do feel any faci'lity displaced in the



downriver areas can cause great concern on the part of the



Authority in the facilities it now supports.



          THE CHAIRMAN:  Thank you.  Are there any questions?



          DR. HEUSTIS:  I would like next to call on the



Oakland County Department of Public Works.  I do not have



the name of an individual.



          MR. REID:  I thought the Regional Planning Com-



mission was next.



          DR. HEUSTIS:  I beg your pardon.  Did I get mixed




up here?




          MR. REID:  We were to come after the Supervisors



Inter-County Committee.  To take an extra second of your

-------
                                                        485



 time, Mr, Chairman, and conferees, may I say we are somewhat



 In the position now of the engaged couple In the nudist camp



 who decided to break their engagement — they had been seeing



 too much of each other.



          THE CHAIRMAN:  Would you identify yourself, please?



          MR. REID:  I am Paul Reid, Director of the Detroit



Metropolitan Area.



          THE CHAIRMAN:  Without clothes it's hard to dis-



tinguish.



          STATEMENT OF PAUL M. REID, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR,



          DETROIT METROPOLITAN AREA REGIONAL PLANNING



          COMMISSION, 800 CADILLAC SQUARE BUILDING,



          DETROIT 26, MICHIGAN



          MR. REID:  The Detroit Metropolitan Area Regional



Planning Commission is the official regional planning agency



for the five-county area of Wayne, Oakland, Maoomb, Washtenaw.



and Monroe counties.  It was established under state enabling



legislation in 19^7 and is concerned with the preparation of



sound plans to guide the physical development of this area.



          At its meeting on March 22, 1962, the Executive



Committee of the Commission considered the purpose of the



conference called for March 27-28, 1962, and adopted the



enclosed resolution.



          The Executive Committee further directed that the



Executive Director of the Commission, Paul M. Reid, and the

-------
                                                        486
Deputy Director for Facility Planning, Fred Cheek, attend
the conference and participate in its proceedings.
          The resolution referred to is as follows;
          WHEREAS the Detroit Metropolitan Area Regional
Planning Commission has been concerned about the problem of
pollution in the Detroit region and in 1949 first undertook
staff studies and established advisory committees on drainage
and pollution in the river basins of the region,
          WHEREAS subsequent studies of water supply needs
and priorities and of sanitary sewer and storm drainage needs
and priorities have been conducted and the findings publi-
cized,
          AND WHEREAS the Detroit Metropolitan Area Regional
Planning Commission has been a constituent member of the
Sanitation Council of Southeastern Michigan, Joining In a
cooperative effort of the six agencies to undertake studies
and plans for proper region-wide systems of sanitary sewer
and storm drainage facilities to Insure public health and
provide safe water supply for the people and economic enter-
prises of the Detroit region,
          THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Detroit Metro-
politan Area Regional Planning Commission:
          (1)  Recognizes the general concern of the federal
               government in pollution problems and appreci-
               ates its willingness to provide assistance in

-------
                                                        48?



              solving these problems In the Detroit region,



              as demonstrated by a pledge of funds to the



              Sanitation Council of Southeastern Michigan,



              and



          (2) Reaffirms its faith in the cooperative effort



              of the Sanitation Council of Southeastern



              Michigan, directed and conducted by local



              governmental and private agencies, and pledges



              its continued desire to assist in carrying



              through an adequate study and proper plan for



              regional sanitary sewer and storm drainage



              facilities in the Detroit region.



          The above resolution was adopted at the March 22,



1962, meeting of the Executive Committee of the Detroit



Metropolitan Area Regional Planning Commission.





                 /s/ Gerard H. Coleman, Secretary





          Thank you.



          THE CHAIRMAN:  Thank you.



          DR. HEUSTIS:  The Oakland County Department of



Public Works.  I have a statement here from them.



          MR. RINGLER:  My name is D. W. Ringler, Deputy



Director of the Oakland County Department of Public Works.



Since this statement is a combined statement of our Depart-



ment and the Office of the Drain Commissioner, and is on

-------
                                                        488
file I will not attempt to read It.
          DR. HEUSTIS:  For the record I have a letter dated
Maroh 22, signed by R. J. Alexander with a statement attached
which will be entered into and made a part of the record,
          STATEMENT OP THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS,
          COUNTY OF OAKLAND, MICHIGAN AND THE DRAIN
          COMMISSION, COUNTY OF OAKLAND, MICHIGAN.
     STATEMENT PRESENTED TO DETROIT RIVER-LAKE ERIE
          CONFERENCE ON MARCH 27,  1962	
          Various areas of Oakland County are naturally
tributary to five different river  basins, three of which are
within the scope of this conference, namely, the Rougej Clinton
and Huron Rivers and the jurisdiction over pollution control
facilities Is divided between the  Drain Commissioner and the
Department of Public Works.  This  letter is, therefore,
being submitted on behalf  of both  Oakland County Departments.
          ROUGE RIVER BASIN:
          Approximately  150 square miles of Oakland County
lies within  the Rouge River Basin  and during the past  several
years considerable planning and  construction has been  done
to provide sanitary facilities  for this rapidly developing
area.  The municipalities  of Bloomfield Hills, Bloomfield
Township, Birmingham and Lathrup Village were cited by the
Water Resources Commission for  pollution of the Rouge  River
and pursuant to this action the Evergreen  Interceptor  was

-------
                                                        489
constructed in 1959 and I960 to provide interceptor sewers for
a 70 square mile area and serves the above municipalities and
all or part of an additional four municipalities.  During
this same period the Parmington Interceptor was constructed
to serve an additional 50 square mile area.  Both of these
systems were designed to serve the area under ultimate built-
up conditions (340,000 population) at rates of 259 gallons
per capita per day, for strictly sanitary districts and 942
gallons per capita per day, for areas served by combined
sewers.  Treatment of sewage is provided by the City of
Detroit through a contract between Detroit and Oakland
Bounty.  These two interceptors, along with six extensions
constructed during the past year, were constructed at a
total cost of $14,548,000.00.
          It is our opinion that adequate facilities have
been constructed and are available to control pollution
within the Rouge River Basin of Oakland County.
          CLINTON RIVER BASIN  (Area of Oakland County
                                directly tributary to
                                Clinton River proper)
          The pollution control projects within this area
that are either under construction or in the planning stage
are listed as follows:
          (a)  City of Pontiao - The City of Pontiao was
               cited by the Water Resources Commission for

-------
                                              490
     pollution of the Clinton River and in 1961,
     $3*500,000.00 of Court Order bonds were sold
     to construct a new sewage treatment plant.
     Both primary and secondary treatment is pro-
     vided,
(b)  Village of Rochester - The Village of RoohesteJ-
     was also cited by the Water Resources Com-
     miesion and in 1961, $350,000.00 of Revenue
     Bonds were sold to expand the primary treat-
     ment facilities and to add secondary treat-
     ment facilities.
(o)  M,S.U»-Oakland - A sanitary sewer system and
     interim sewage treatment plant was constructed
     in I960 to provide sewage disposal service
     for the new Michigan State University-Oakland
     and surrounding areas.  This system provides
     both primary and secondary treatment and was
     constructed at a cost of $800,000.00.
(d)  The remainder of this district is virtually
     without sanitary sewers and consequently
     septic tanks are used for sewage disposal,
     however, plans for an interceptor system have
     been prepared under a $311,000.00 planning
     advance from the Housing and Home Finance
     Agency.  Treatment would be provided by eithef

-------
                                                        491
                the construction of a treatment plant on the
                Clinton River or by the  construction of an
                Interceptor to the  Detroit  system,  If and
                when a contract can be negotiated with the
                City of Detroit.
           It Is our opinion that adequate  measures to abate
 pollution, with minor exceptions,  have  either been constructed
 or are being constructed.   The only exceptions to this
 statement are those areas  where septic  tank facilities do
 not function properly during certain seasons of the year,
 however,  trunk interceptors and lateral sewers will be con-
 structed  when the service  district is sufficiently developed
 to support a bond issue.
           CLINTON RIVER BASIN; (Area of Oakland County trib-
                                 utary to Clinton River via
                                 Red  Run Drain)
           In 19^2, the Oakland County Drain Commissioner
 constructed  the Southeastern Interceptor, rtiioh provided
 sewage disposal service for approximately  48 square miles
 In  the south-east corner of Oakland  County.  The facilities
 consisted  of a sanitary Interceptor  from the outlets of the
 Royal  Oak, Campbell Road,  Lawson and  John  R. Road Drains to
 the City of  Detroit sewer  system south  of  8 Mile Road and
 serves all or part of  the  Cities of Hazel  Park, Madison
Heights, Ferndale, Huntington  Woods,  Pleasant Ridge, Royal

-------
                                                        492
Oak, Clawson, Oak Park, Berkley, Birmingham, Troy, Southfield,
the Village of Beverly Hills and Royal Oak Township.
          Since 1942, the population within Southeastern
Oakland County Sewage Disposal System District has increased
substantially and, therefore, the Oakland County Drain Com-
missioner has a $40,000,000.00 storm relief system under
contract for construction, and intends to have a relief san-
itary interceptor and the enclosure of a portion of the Red
Run Drain under contract within the next several months to
control pollution.  The relief interceptor, which will be known
as the Dequindre Interceptor, along with the Red Run Enclosure,
will provide for a total flow of  198 b.f.s. from an estimated
future population of 500,000 people to outlet into the De-
troit system.
          The storm relief system (12 Towns Drain) outlet  Is
provided with a high weir outlet  structure designed to pro-
vide storage in the system amounting to  100 acre feet, and
at the same time skim the overflow.  The Dequindre Inter-
ceptor will de-water the system after each  storm.  It is an-
ticipated that no overflow will occur with  rains of less than
 .10 inch over the area.  Since the service  area is not fully
developed, it is estimated that the total average volume of
storm water to be treated. In any  one year,  based  on an  initial
maximum interceptor rate of  115 o.f.s.,  will  be approximately
 12,000 acre feet.  For  any given  year this  volume can be ex-

-------
                                                         493
 pected to vary from 5,000 acre feet to 18,000 acre feet  with
 spills occurring only about twelve times per year.  The
 estimated oost of the Dequindre Interceptor and Red Run  En-
 closure is $7,480,000.00.
           It is our opinion that the construction of the 12
 Towns Relief Drain, the  Dequindre Interceptor and the Red
 Run Enclosure will adequately abate pollution*
           HURON RIVER BASIN:
           This section of Oakland County is rather sparsely
 populated, and except for several small Villages that have
 constructed sewage treatment facilities, septic tanks are
 in general use*  A detailed preliminary plan for trunk: sewers
 and treatment facilities or interceptor to  a metropolitan
 system is being prepared under a planning advance from the
 Housing and Home Finance Agency.  Since these studies are
 not complete, we are not in a position to comment on the
 adequacy of measures to*ate pollution in this basin
           SUMMARY;
           During the past  four years,  Oakland  County munici-
palities have expended  $19*198,000.00  for sanitary  Inter-
ceptors  and  treatment facilities to abate pollution and an
additional  $40,000,000.00  for relief sewers  to protect the
public health.   It  is also  estimated that at  least  $7,480,000
will be  expended  In 1962 for interceptor facilities.  We
firmly believe that  the major  sources of pollution either

-------
                                                       494

have or will be corrected by the end of 1962 and that  facil-

ities for the unsewered areas of the County will be provided

when bonding permits.

                     Very truly yours,

                  /s/ R. J. Alexander, Director
                      Oakland County Department of Public  Works


                 /B/ Daniel W. Barry, Drain Commissioner



          DR.HEUSTIS:  The next city I would like to call  is

the City of Wyandotte.  I saw George Hazey here.

          STATEMENT OF CARL P. BUPE, SUPERINTENDENT,

          DEPARTMENT OP MUNICIPAL SERVICE AND GEORGE

          J. HAZEY, SUPERINTENDENT, WATER DIVISION,

          DEPARTMENT OF MUNICIPAL  SERVICE, 2555

          VAN ALSTYNE BLVD., WYANDOTTE, MICHIGAN

          MR. BUPE:  I am Carl Bufe, Superintendent of

Municipal Service of the City of Wyandotte, which depart-

ment operates the water and electrical department.  Mr.

Hazey, Superintendent of the Water Division will make the

statement.

          DR. HEUSTIS:  Can you prevail on Mr. Hazey to cut

his statement down, Mr. Bufe?

          MR. BUFE:  I have been working on him.

          DR,HEUSTIS:  Mr. Hazey, anything you oan do to

shorten  the presentation of this extremely important mate-

-------
                                                        495
rial will be greatly appreciated*
           MR. HAZEY:  I will speak as fast  as I can,  Doctor,
           The City of Wyandotte, on the west  bank of  the
 Detroit River, has been the home of its citizens and  its
 industries for over 100 years.  Its present population Is
 about 44,000.  Two of its major industries, whose reputation
 and products are nation-wide In scope are:  The Wyandotte
 Chemicals Corporation and its J. B. Ford Division, and the
 Pennsalt Chemicals Corporation and its west plant division,
 the former Sharpies Company.
           Water and electric power utilities  are city owned,
 and the Detroit River Is the source of water  supply for both
 units.  Since 1948 approximately $10,000,000  has been spent  for
 expansion of these utilities, paid for by earnings, and with-
 out any increase in consumer rates.  Both utilities are free
 of bonded Indebtedness.  Fire protection services and public
 lighting services are installed, maintained  and operated
 by the utilities division at an annual cost of $1.00 each to
 the city government.  Corrosion control of water mains, now
 in its 10th year, and fluoridation, now entering its 12th
 year,  .are provided without additional cost to the consumer.
 Presently under construction for the water division are
 modern mixing and settling facilities, costing $800,000
 will be paid for by cashew hand.  In the engineering stage
 presently is a program for an addition to our water dlstri-

-------
                                                        496



button system approximating a cost of $1,250,000.  The water



service for our consumers has  no restrictions as to use



for air-conditioning and lawn sprinkling.  Our basic water



rates have nox; been increased since their adoption in 1927.



          The activities of our utilities divisions are di-



rected towards improving service, attracting new industries



and people, continuing adequate service at low cost to the



consumer, and making our community a better place in which



to live.



          Copies of the 68th Annual Report, for the fiscal



year ending September 30,  1961 are presented for the record.



          On July  21, 1950 at about 1:30 PM the City of



Wyandotte placed in operation a new raw water intake line.



This line was  constructed  at a cost of approximately $211,000k



The line extends into the  Detroit River about 1800  feet from



the American Shore.  The  intake crib for this line  was  lo-



cated at a point to provide a water of acceptable quality



as the source  of its public water supply.  This  location was



supported by the following facts:



          1.   Permit  issued by the U.S. Army Corps  of



               Engineers,  Detroit District.



          2.   Permit for  construction, without any  qualifi-



               cations,  issued by the Michigan Department of



               Health.



          3.   The  new line was designed, constructed and

-------
                                          497



located to assure its source of water would



be from the main ship channel.  The quality



of these waters was substantiated further by



the data from the following surveys:



a.  U. S. PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE



    Environmental Health Center



    SPECIAL STUDIES-U.S. Hopper Dredge



    SAVANNAH Operations-Detroit River:



    June-August 1948 Item 2 of the conclusions



    of the report is as follows and we quote:



    "The dumping of Rouge River dredged mater-



    ials in the Detroit River at the head of



    Fighting Island constitutes an  extension



    of pollution to a relatively unpolluted



    area of the Detroit River,



b.  The report of the International Joint Com-



    mission, United States and Canada, on the



    Pollution of Boundary Waters, 195L



    The data in this report from the 1946-1948



    survey show the waters at Detroit Range



    14.6-W at 2000 feet from the American shore



    to have a coliform MPN median value of



    2400 per 100 milliliters.  This range i&



    about 600 feet north of the present intake



    crib location.

-------
                                                        498
          Further, it was expected that due recognition
would be given to the fact that the Detroit River is a boundary
water, under the Jurisdiction of the International Joint Com-
mission as outlined by the International Waters Treaty of
1909; and that adequate protection would be provided for the
use of boundary waters for domestic purposes as specifically
outlined in ARTICLE VIII of the treaty.
          Furthermore, it was expected that upon acceptance
of the findings, remedial measures, and conclusions of the
1951 International Joint Commission report on the pollution
of Boundary waters, these waters would retain their good
qualities, and gradually proceed to improve towards a better
quality.
          The letters and reports filed with the various
agencies concerned, with respect to sewage pollution at our
new intake source, have been many over the years.  We believe
the following review will serve the purpose at this time:-
AUGUST 31, 1953
          The City of Wyandotte received a letter from the
Technical Advisory Board to the International Joint Commis-
sion under the above date, requesting full information on
the progress being made to meet the objectives outlined in
Boundary Waters Quality Control.  Also full information with
respect to taste and odor problems in the city water that
would be attributable to pollutants in the raw water.  As

-------
                                                        499


requested, a  report was presented In complete detail, at



Its regular scheduled meeting held on September 18, 1953 in



Windsor, Ontario, Canada.



MARCH 20, 1958



          A letter was forwarded to the Sewage Division of the?



Michigan Department of Health expressing our oonoern with



the increasing degree of sewage pollution in raw water qual-



ity.  Complete data with respect to the MPN index values for



the years 1951 to 1957 Inclusive, and the first two months



of 1958 were  attached to the letter.  Information was re-



quested relative to measures in effect, or contemplated, that



might reduce  this gross pollution and its potential health



hazard to a rightful level.  On May 2", 1958 and May 28,



1958 a request was made for a response to our letter of



March 20, 1958.  On June 2, 1958 a response was received.



This letter stated that the problem was being studied, and



that they were trying to arrive at a statistically sound



conclusion, and that we would be advised of their opinion



at a later date.



OCTOBER 21,  1958



          A complete report was filed with the Water Resources
                                                             j


Commission on the State of Michigan with respect to the de-



gree of sewage pollution In the raw water supply.  Our



letter asked that an investigation be made of this pollution,



that controls be provided  for the reduction in the degree of
                                                   GPO 620819—8-29

-------
                                                        500
sewage pollution, and that the degree of protection be in
aooord with the specific objectives as outlined by the Inter-
national Joint Commission,  On November 14, 1958 additional
information was forwarded to the Water Resources Commission
as requested and pertinent to our letter of October 21.
FEBRUARY 6, 1959
          A meeting was  held in Lansing, Michigan, at the
offices of the Water Resources Commission, with city repre-
sentatives and the  staff members of the Commission.  At
this  time, the staff outlined the program for  sewage pol-
lution control in the  Detroit River.  The final report of
this  meeting  states that an  improvement in the sanitary
quality of the city's  intake would be noticeable  in  1961.
AUGUST 26a 1959
          A  letter  to  which  was  attached a detailed  report
on the degree of sewage pollution  in our raw water source,
was presented to the Technical Advisory Board  to  the Inter-
national  Joint  Commission on Control of Pollution of
Boundary  Waters at  its regular scheduled meeting  held in
Albany, New York on the above date.
           This letter advised the  Board  that  the city was
not aware of any work having been done, or being  done, for
 pollution control in the lower Detroit River.   The Board
 was requested to consider the data presented and  substanti-
 ate it, if necessary.   If all was found to be in proper

-------
                                                        501



order, it was  requested that there be set  In  motion the



required procedures to provide adequate protection for the



source of domestic supply for the city of  Wyandotte.  It



was also asked that should we be in error  in our interpre-



tation of the  protection available to us under Boundary



Water Pollution  Control, as outlined by the International



Joint Commission, we would be pleased to be so informed.



          Today, two years and seven months since the pre-



sentation of the letter and report, it still is unanswered.



MAY 17, I960



          The  City Council of the city, in regular session



on the above date, passed a resolution with specific refer-



ence to pollution in the Detroit River.  In brief it asked



that the Detroit office of the Public Health Service increase



its activities in the matter of pollution control in the



Detroit River, that pollution enforcement agencies in the



state of Michigan increase their vigilance in the matter



of enforcement to insure the speedy attainment of IJC



objectives.  Copies of the resolution were forwarded to



the following:



               International Joint Commission



               Michigan Department of Health



               Water Resources Commission



               Mr.  Arthur1 Fleratung;  Secretary-Health,



                 Education and  Welfare

-------
                                                         502



           On November 22, 1961 a letter was sent to Mr.



 Abraham RIbiooff, Secretary of Health, Education and Wel-



 fare, Washington, D.C.  This letter expressed our views  and



 comments on the pollution problem in the Detroit River.



 Copies of the letter were sent to the following:



                Governor J. B. Swainson, State of Michigan



                International Joint Commission



                State of Michigan-Representatives in



                  Congress and Senate



           Monthly reports, as required by regulations, are



 filed with the Michigan Department of Health.  These contain



 data relative to daily operations, such as total water pump-



 age, dosage of all chemicals applied in treatment, physical



 and  chemical analyses, and the results of bacteriological



 analyses on both raw and finished waters.



           Although the recommendation of the International



 Joint Commission report with respect to the establishment and



 operation of a local office for continuing supervision over



 boundary waters pollution had been complied with, little or



 no work: had been done in the lower Detroit River,  The first



 occasion of survey work was started after the city filed a



 report on pollution in our raw water source with the Advi-



sory  Board to the International Joint Commission, United



 States Section, on August 26, 1959.



           The International Joint Commission report of 1951

-------
                                                        503



on the pollution of Boundary Waters set forth both general



and specific objectives for the protection of the various



uses of these waters.  The present day status of these ob-



jectives apparently can only be concluded to be in the cate-



gory of "something to be desired, but not to be achieved0"



          Fourteen years have now passed since the conclusion



of the 1946-1948 survey on pollution in the Detroit River



by the Public Health Service, and twelve years since our new



intake was placed in service.  Let's briefly review the data



taken from our operating records with specific reference to



the degree of sewage pollution in the raw water:-



         ANNUAL AVERAGE RAW WATER COLIFORM INDEX



           MOST PROBABIE NUMBERS PER 100 ML.



1.  The period of January 1, 1955 to December 31, 1958



    exceeds tne previous period of January 1, 1951 to



    December 31, 1954 by 44.4$.



2.  The period of January 1, 1956 to December 31, I960 ex-



    ceeds the previous period of January 1, 1951 to December



    31, 1955 by 82.1$.



3.  The period of January 1, 1956 to December 31, 1961 ex-



    ceeds the previous period of Januay 1, 1951 to December



    31, 1955 by 126.$.



          Data obtained from the annual reports of the City



of Detroit, Department of Water Supply indicate the follow-



ing:-  for the period of July 1, 1952 to June 30, 1958 the

-------
                                                        504



annual average of the MPN Index per 100 ml. for raw water



quality was 79.07.



          Our operating records indicate the following:



for the period of January 1, 1952 to December 31, 1958 the



annual average of the MPN index per 100 ml. for raw water



quality was 11,666.



          The above data indicates the drastic change in



raw water quality between two raw water intakes on the same



river less than 15 miles apart.



          Further comparison, based on median values are



of interest.  Quoted below are the percentage figure by which



actual median values for the year and month presented ex-



ceeds the median value of 2400 per 100 ml. which the Inter-



national Joint Commission states in its specific objectives



should provide adequate protection for water intakes:



                                 1951   %   1961
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
358
92
0
0
92
288
288
288
615
213
288
0
0
288
1,358
525
900
1,900

-------
                                                       505
                            1951       1961
           OCTOBER            79         79
           NOVEMBER             0         79
           DECEMBER             0          0
           Such a  record most certainly does not indicate
 progress;  nor is  it one to be proud of; nor is it in keeping
 with  present-day  concern about preserving our water re-
 sources; it certainly does not give recognition to the fact
 that  the preservation of the public health is of paramount
 importance; and finally these conditions are permitted to
 exist in spite of the fact that all sewage pollution must
 be considered as a potential health hazard.
           It Is evident that those who are responsible for or
 permit discharges of raw,  partially or inadequately treated
 sewage to enter the Detroit River exhibit little or no con-
 cern as to the effects of  these discharges upon the receiv-
 ing stream, especially with reference to protecting the
 sources of domestic uses,
          A specific incident occurred during the winter of
 1955-1956.   The coliform MPN count of our raw water began
 Increasing and no immediate cause was apparent at the time.
Upon investigation,  it was found that on October 27, 1955
the Pairview Sewage pumping station for the City of Detroit
was shut down for repairs.  This required that approximately
 1^0,000,000 to 200,000,000 gallons per day of raw sewage be

-------
                                                        506
diverted directly into the Detroit River.  Further investi-
gation revealed that State Health agencies concerned were
not aware of, nor had given approval for this discharge of
raw sewage.
          No emergency measures were provided for to com-
bat the potential health hazard of these discharges, nor
was the City of Wyandotte notified.  This diversion contin-
ued even though a severe ice  jam had occurred at the head
of the St. Glair River at Port Huron, Michigan,  This ice
jam resulted in a reduction of water levels and normal water
flow was reduced from 180,000 cubic feet per second to about
80,000 cubic feet per second, a loss of flow of 55$.  On
February 2, 1956 the Fairvlew pumping station resumed tem-
porary operations due to low  water levels.  On April 12,
1956 the station was again taken out of service and raw sew-
age diverted directly to the  river.  Repairs were completed
and sewage pumping  station returned to service on May 27,
1956.
          On January 14, 1958 the Detroit Sewage treatment
plant suspended operations in order that a diver could in-
spect the effluent  outlet on  the Detroit river bottom.  Our
operating records show that the chlorine demand of the raw
water at 9:15 AM to be 31$ per million gallons, then dropped
to a low of 16# per million gallons, and then returned to
    per million gallons at 9:20 FM.  This operation was re-

-------
                                                        507



peated again on January 15* 1958.  At 5:00 AM the chlorine



demand of the raw water was 31# per million gallons, then



dropped to a low of 13# per million gallons, then returned



to 28# per million gallons at 10:15 EM.  This data is indic-



ative of the effect of the sewage treatment plant effluent



on the chlorine demand of the raw water at our intake.



          On April 29, 1958 the Detroit Sewage plant had



occasion to discontinue the discharge of the sewage plant



effluent into the Detroit River in order to permit the in-



spection of the effluent outlet on the river bottom.  Samples



were taken for bacteriological tests to determine the MPN



index of raw water every half-hour from 9:00 AM till midnight.



The following is indicative of shut-down and start-up of



operations;

-------
                                                        508
           9 tOO AM to 7:30 PM
                8 samples      MPN Index per 100 ml	    0
                                                         360
                                                         730
                                                         910
                                          "              2100
                                          "              2300
                                          "              9300
                                          "            110000
                                          11             15000
                                          11             24000
                                          11              4300
                                          11              9300
                                          11              2300
               31 samples

         On December 19> I960  the  City  of Detroit advised us
of a breakdown of pumping operations at  their Conners Creek
station*   Pump damage would  require about four weeks for
repairs and a  new station was  under const ruction at the time
and would  be completed  In about four weeks.  During this
period, It was stated that a volume of  raw  sewage ranging
from 120 to 240 cubic feet per second would be discharged
Into the Detroit  River.   We  are not aware if permission was
granted for this  discharge,  or if  emergency measures were





8-9 PM
9:30
10:00
10:30
11:00
11:30
mldnlte
3
2
5
1
3
3
1
1
1
1
1
1

"
¥
it
it
ii
ii
it
it
it
H
¥

-------
                                                        509
provided for to protect downstream uses.
         Our records Indicate that we received a total of
50 telephone calls from personnel of the Detroit Sewace
Treatment plant,  advising us that chlorlnatlon at the plant
would be suspended for various reasons.  The period of sus-
pension of chlorinations ranged from several hours to seven
days.  These suspensions of ohlorination were during the time
period of January 1, 1946 to December 31, 1961.
         It is about time that adequate protection be pro-
vided public water supply sources in the lower Detroit River
by means other than a telephone call, whenever upstream con-
tributors of sewage pollution suspend chlorination at treat-
ment plants, or by-pass discharges of raw sewage.
         With reference to industrial pollution that pro-
duce objectionable taste and odor problems during treatment,
it must be acknowledged that considerable progress has been
made.  However* taste and odor problems have occurred on
occasion.  A severe condition occurred this year during the
entire month of February and the early part of March.  A
complete report on the varying chlorine demand of the raw
water, and the occurrence of tastes and odors in the finished
water have been filed with the Detroit Office of the Public
Health Service and the Water Resources Commission.  Since
efficient survey work cannot be done during the winter
months, and this  is the time that the problem is acute,
it is Indicated that more adequate controls should be pro-

-------
                                                        510



vided at  the  sources  of such discharges known to be the cause



of  these  taste  and  odor problems.



          In 1944  the  City of Wyandotte began the use of chlo*'



line dioxide treatment for control  of  taste and odors due to



industrial wastes pollutants in  the raw water supply.  Ap-



proximately $18,355.00 has been  spent for this control from



the period of January 1, 1951  to December 31, 1961.



          For  a point  of clarification, Mr. Chairman, it is



not the total cost  but strictly  the sodium chlorite used



on  treatment.  I  don't know how  we can evaluate the time and



dollars spent in  trying to arrive  at  an adequate and effi.



dent  treatment to prevent the  taste and odors from reaching



our consumers.



          In 1948  the  city purchased an automatic chlorine



residual chlorine recorder, to provide for more accurate



control of pretreatment in the use of chlorine, due to vary-



ing chlorine  demand of the raw water. This  instrument was



the first of  its  kind in the  state of Michigan and the first



to  be used for control purposes  with  chlorlnation of raw



water.   The instrument is equipped with alarm controls, to



indicate changes  in chlorine  demand,  and  operation is con-



tinuously recorded  on a chart.  The  instrument has been



effective in  controlling taste and odor problems by the



use of  chlorine and thereby reducing  the  cost of chlorine



dioxide treatment.   The savings  can be visualized when

-------
                                                        511



comparing the oost of nine cents for one pound of chlorine



versus the conversion of one pound of sodium chlorite to



chlorine dioxide costing 79 cents.  The original cost of



the instrument was $3,000.00.  Presently experimental work



is being done with another unit of automatic chlorine residual



recording.  Upon acceptance, it will be placed into service



at a cost of $2,800.00.



         An Absolute Light Scattering Photometer has been



purchased and is on hand, at a cost of $3,700.00 for use



with our new pretreatment facilities now under construction.



This instrument will be  used in order to assure that water



of the highest quality will be supplied our consumers at all



times.



         The Michigan Department of Health has advised the



City*of Wyandotte that it should seek a better source of



raw water quality, since there are no indications that the



present quality of water at our intake would ever improve,



and that conditions are  indicative that raw water quality would



be injured further by increased sewage pollution.  Once



again the Detroit River  as a boundary water under Internationr-



al Treaty, and for which the International Joint Commission



has spelled out specific objectives for pollution control



to provide adequate protection for domestic uses therein,



is looked upon as suitable only for the disposal of indus-



trial wastes and sewage.  To this kind of thinking we do not

-------
                                                        512
subscribe.
         Only three alternatives are available to the City,
should it ever consider another source of water supply.  A
brief review is as follows:
         A.  At an expense of several million dollars, con-
             struct a new  intake line under city streets to
             tie-in to the Wayne County raw water tunnel,
             whose shore shaft is located in the northern
             part of the city, about 1.8 miles from the
             present filter plant.  This water would not be
             desirable since it is contaminated by sulphur
             water due to  leakage of the tunnel under the
             river.  The intake line is also situated in
             the Detroit River and subject to sewage pollution.
                                                              /
         B.  At an expense in excess of a million dollars,
             extend the present intake line from American
             waters to Canadian waters.  Before considering
             suoh a project, it would be expected that we
             would be notified by a responsible agency that
             the disposal  of industrial wastes and sewage
             in these waters take precedence over domestic
             uses; and that pollution control agencies at  all
             levels  of government cannot control pollution
             of these waters;  and that the  waters of  the
             United  States section  of the  lower Detroit

-------
                                                        513
             River are no longer available to the citizens
             of Wyandotte for use as a source of its public
             water supply.
         C.  Abandon the present water treatment plant and
             its facilities and take water from the City
             of Detroit.  This would involve a financial
             loss, an increase in water rates for our con-
             sumers, and a tremendous expenditure of money
             to reverse the water distribution system.  Since
             the City of Detroit is presently responsible
             for the greater share of sewage pollution at
             our intake in the lower Detroit River, such actiqn
             on our part would be giving consent to continu-
             ing the pollution of our public waters;  We have
             no intention of subscribing to such a principle.
         The questions at hand to be solved are quite ob-
vious :
             1.  Can adequate protection be provided for
                 the source of public water supply for the
                 City of Wyandotte?
             2.  If so, wherein lies the responsibility to
                 provide this adequate protection?
         We are fully confident that this Conference, upon
review of all the facts, will be fair and just in its
decisions.  Thank you for the courtesy of our appearing at

-------
this conference and presenting our report.
                           Very truly yours,

                           CITY OF WYANDOTTE

                           Department of Municipal Service
                           /s/ George J. Hazey
                               Superintendent Water Division
         (Applause)

         THE CHAIRMAN:  Thank you, Mr. Hazey.  Are there

any questions or comments?

         There might be just one that I have for the purpose

of clarification.  As I recall it, Mr. Kittrell's report

indicated that the taste and odor problems in drinking water

downstream had disappeared and that your report indicates on

occasion you still have some tastes and odor problems.

         MR. HAZEY:  Mr. Chairman, it is quite difficult

to evaluate taste and odor problems.  My opinion is v/hen  1£ 1*

suitable for complaining we like to complain.  Due to the

varying chlorine demand of our water, I think you will agree

it is very difficult to pinpoint very troublesome things  as

to the exact source.  Unfortunately, the incident that oc-

curred in February and March was not in time to present here.

It has been detailed and I thought there was no point in  pur-

suing it.

         THE CHAIRMAN:  That is correct, and I thought the

-------
                                                        515
Information you have, without objection from the conferees,
will probably take precedence over that statement.
          MR. HAZEY:  I like to give credit where credit is
due.
          THE CHAIRMAN:  Yes.  Thank you.
          DR. HEUSTIS:  The next statement will be  from the
City of Estral Beach and Lake Erie Clean-up Committee.  Mr.
John Chasesa.  Do you have a written statement?
          MR. CHASCSA:  I have several documents, sir.
          THE CHAIRMAN:  May we have a five minute  recess at
this point?
          (Whereupon a recess was had.)
          THE CHAIRMAN:  Will you kindly take your seats so
we can resume?  Mr. Chasesa.
          (See Volume II, Part 2 for continuation.)
                                                  GPO 820819—B-30

-------