ENVIRONMENTAL  PROTECTION AGENCY
            OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
                  EPA 330/2-76-012
                    REPORT ON
          State Implementation Plan
           Air Pollution  Inspection
                      of
           Standard Oil Company
            LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER
              DENVER. COLORADO
                     AND
     REGION IX, SAN FRANCISCO,  CALIFORNIA
                FEBRUARY 1976

-------
                            STANDARD OIL CO.
                             . EL SEGUNDO
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
     Standard Oil Company operates a 36,600 m  (230,000 bbl)/day in-
tegrated crude oil refinery in El  Segundo, California.   An air pollution
related inspection of these facilities was conducted by NEIC personnel
on November 17-18, 1975.  Substantial amounts of process and air pollution
control equipment information were requested of, and received from the
Company.  The Los Angeles Air Pollution Control District (LAAPCD) was
requested to supply information pertaining to stack testing conducted at
this facility and any violation notices issued to the Company.

     The following conclusions were derived based on the inspection and
information obtained:

     1.   General housekeeping at the refinery appeared to be excellent.

     2.   All equipment at the refinery is operating unde.r a valid
          LAAPCD permit.

     3.   Using EPA emission factors, the calculated emission rates from
          the CO boiler ESP unit exceed the allowable rates under
          LAAPCD Rule 54.  Stack tests recently conducted
          by the LAAPCD for Standard on this exhaust indicate
          that the emissions comply with Rule 54.  However, it
          is not known whether these tests were conducted at
          typical unit operating conditions.

     4.   Using EPA emission factors, the process heaters and boilers at
          this facility appear to be significant sources of nitrogen
          dioxide.  There are no LAAPCD regulations which apply to these
          units.

-------
RECOMMENDATIONS

     1.    Standard should be required to stack test the sulfur plant
          tail gas treatment units at least once per year.

     2.    Standard should be required to stack test the existing ESP
          unit at the mid-point of the turnarounds.

     3.    Reports of the above tests should be provided to the Enforce-
          ment Division of the LAAPCD and to the Director,  Enforcement
          Division, USEPA, Region IX.

-------
              ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                   OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
                  STATE  IMPLEMENTATION  PLAN

                        INSPECTION  OF

             STANDARD  OIL  COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA
                    EL  SEGUNDO REFINERY
                        P.O.  Box 97
                El  Segundo,  California  90245
                        (213)322-3450
                    November 17-18, 1975
                        February 1976
NATIONAL ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS CENTER - Denver, Colorado

                             and

            REGION IX - San Francisco, California

-------
                CONTENTS

                                          Page
INTRODUCTION 	  1
PROCESS DESCRIPTION  	  3
POTENTIAL AIR EMISSION SOURCES
  AND RELATED CONTROL EQUIPMENT  	 '3
EMISSIONS DATA	16
SUMMARY OF PAST VIOLATIONS	21
INSPECTION SUMMARY 	 21
APPENDIX
   A   NEIC REQUEST LETTER
   B   LAAPCD RULES
   C   PROCESS HEATER AND BOILER INFORMATION
   D   INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES DATA
   E   STORAGE TANK LISTING
   F   FLARE DATA
   G   SOURCE TEST DATA, FCC UNIT
   H   SOURCE TEST DATA, SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT
   I   SOURCE TEST DATA, SULFURIC ACID PLANT
                     111

-------
INTRODUCTION
Background

     Standard Oil Company of California,  El  Segundo,  California,  operates
an integrated petroleum refinery, at this location, with a rated  capacity
           o
of 36,500 m  (230,000 bbl)/day of crude oil.   Major products  from this
refinery include jet fuels, diesel fuel,  gasoline, fuel  oil,  petroleum
coke, liquid petroleum gas (LPG), asphalt and a variety  of solvents
including benzene, toluene, and xylene (BTX).

     The Standard Refinery, already the most complex  in  the Los Angeles
area, is constructing a new facility to produce low sulfur fuel oil.
                                                          o
This addition will raise the refinery capacity to 64,400 m  (405,000
bbl)/day.  The new complex is expected to start operation in  mid-1976.

     El Segundo Refinery employs about 1,250 people and  the facility
operates three 8-hour shifts, 7 days per week, year around.

     On November 17-18, 1975, a process inspection was conducted  at this
facility by NEIC personnel.  The inspection was preceded by a letter to
the Company [Appendix A] on September 8,  1975, announcing NEIC's  intention
to inspect the facility and requesting substantial amounts of process
and source information.  Subsequent to the inspection, Standard personnel
transmitted the requested information by mail.

     During the inspection, an examination was made of the refining
equipment, potential air pollution sources, and air pollution control
equipment.  The purpose of this inspection was to evaluate the degree of
compliance of this facility with the requirements of  the Federally
approved State Implementation Plan as required by Section 110 of  the
Clean Air Act, as amended.

-------
     Company personnel were highly cooperative throughout this inspection.
They supplied all information EPA requested during the inspection inter-
view or by subsequent letter.


Inspection Participants

     0. W. Daily - Senior Staff Specialist, Conservation
                   Standard Oil Company
     L. R. Ray - Staff Specialist, Standard Oil Company
     W. Carson - State of California Air Resources Board (ARB)
     John R.  Powell - Los Angeles Air Pollution Control District (LAAPCD)
     Lloyd Kostow - USEPA, Region IX
     Wayne C. Smith - USEPA, NEIC

Applicable Regulations

     The following rules contained in the Rules and Regulations of the
Los Angeles County Air Pollution Control District (LAAPCD) [detailed in
Appendix B] are applicable to the State Implementation Plan for this
facility:

          Rule SO.   Ringelmann Chart
          Rule 51.   Nuisance
          Rule 52.   Particulate Matter - Concentration
          Rule 53.   Sulfur Compounds - Concentration
          Rule S3.2  Sulfur Recovery Units
          Rule 54.   Solid Particulate Matter - Weight
          Rule 56.   Storage of Petroleum Products
          Rule 59.   Effluent Oil/Water Separators
          Rule 61.   Organic Liquid Loading
          Rule 62.   Sulfur Content of Fuels
          Rule 67.   Fuel Burning Equipment

-------
          Pule 68.   Fuel Burning Equipment - Combustion Contaminants
          Rule 69,   Vacuum Producing Devices or Systems
          Rule 70.   Asphalt Air Blowing
          Rule 71.   Carbon Monoxide
          Rule 72.   Pumps and Compressors
          Rule 73.   Safety Pressure Valves

PROCESS DESCRIPTION

     The Standard Refinery processes crude oil received from several
locations.  Approximately 50% of the crude is received from domestic
sources (i.e., California) and the other 50% is imported.   Crude oil  is
delivered to the refinery by pipeline and tanker.   Primary products
include LPG, gasoline, jet fuel, diesel fuel, fuel oil, petroleum coke,
ethylene, asphalt, and solvents, including benzene, toluene, and xylene
(BTX).

     Major processes at this refinery include crude desalting, atmospheric
distillation, vacuum distillation, delayed coking, catalytic cracking,
hydrocracking, catalytic reforming, hydrotreating, isomerization,
alkylation, BTX production, hydrogenation, hydrogen production, asphalt
manufacturing, sulfur recovery, and sulfuric acid regeneration.  A
simplified process block flow diagram for the facility is shown in
Figure 1.  Table 1 lists the unit capacities for each of these processes,
as listed in The Oil and Gas Journal, April 7, 1975.
POTENTIAL SOURCES OF AIR POLLUTION EMISSIONS AND RELATED CONTROL EQUIPMENT

     Although the Standard El Segundo Refinery is an extremely complex
facility, there are relatively few large discrete potential sources of
air pollutant emissions.  With the exception of the fluid catalytic

-------
                                                                 FIGURE 1
                                                      STANDARD OIL, "El Segundo Refinery
                                                           SIMPLIFIED FLOW DIAGRAM
                         Refinery Fuel Gas
Crude Oil
             A tin.
             Distillatloi
             Unit
Straight Run Gasoline
                          Distillate
            Vacuum
            Distillation
            Unit
                          Light Gas Oil
                          Heavy Gaa Oil
                     Residuum
                           Asphalt Unit
                                                                                     Reformers
                                                   Light  Ends
                                                   Fractionation
                                         Gasoline Base
                                                                                     Hydrotreater
                                                   Hydrocracker
                                                                   Jet  Fuel  Stock,
                                                             HF          p
                                                             Alkylation  |
                                                      Fluid
                                                      Catalytic
                                                      Cracking
                                                      Unit
                                           ISO & N
                                           Butanes
                                                                    Cat.  Cast
                                                    Delayed Coker
                                                                    "Jet  Fuel  S took
                                                                                       Hydrogenatlon Units
                                                                                       Fuel Gas
                                                                                       Gasoline
                                                                                                                 Jet  Fuel
                                                                                       I.PC
                                                                                       To Gasoline
                                                                                       Blending
                                                                                                                Catalytic  Gasoline
                                                                                                                Coke
                                                                                                                Asphalt
                                                                                                                "Fuel Ull
                                                                                                                JDistillat.i
                                                                                                                 Distillate

-------
              Table 1

PROCESS UNITS AND RATED CAPACITIES
       STANDARD OIL COMPANY
        EL SEGUNDO REFINERY
Process Unit
Crude Units
Vacuum Unit
Delayed Coker
Fluid Catalytic Cracking
Catalyst Reforming
Catalytic Hydrotreating
Alkylation
Aromatics/Isomerization
Asphalt
Capacity
(mW)
36,600
16,400
8,600
6,900
9,500
11,100
940
240
1,300
(bbl/SDf)
230,000
103,000
54,000
43,500
60,000
70,000
5,900
1,500
8,300
t Stream Day

-------
cracking (FCC) unit, the major unit processes at the refinery are closed
systems and release of materials to the atmosphere is discouraged
because such releases would results in loss of product.   The process
heaters attendant to these units constitute the main emission sources.

     There are also a myriad of relatively small potential  sources of
emissions related to the operation of the refinery.  Such sources
include leaks from valve seals, pump seals and pipe flanges, and evapora-
tive losses from storage tanks and process wastewater drains.  Potential
sources of emissions and their related control equipment are discussed
below.
Process Heaters and Boilers

     There are 82 process heaters and steam boilers ranging in size from
250 X 106 to 75 X 109 cal (1 X 106 to 300 X 106 Btu)/hour.  A complete
listing of these units is presented in Appendix C.  Two of the boilers
are used as spare equipment and 9 of the process heaters are currently
idle.

     The majority of these units utilize refinery fuel gas as fuel.  The
remainder can be fueled with either refinery gas or fuel oil.  Except
for the carbon monoxide (CO) boiler at the FCC unit which will be dis-
cussed later, none of the process heaters or boilers are equipped with
emission control devices and none would be expected to have such equip-
ment.

     Sulfur oxide emissions from these units are controlled by limiting
the sulfur content of the fuels burned.  Refinery gas must be desulfur-
                          3                  3
ized to less than 1.1 gm/m  (50 grains/100 ft ) of sulfur compounds.
Fuel oil used in stationary fuel burning equipment is produced in the
refinery from low sulfur crude.  The sulfur content of the fuel is less
than 0.5% by weight.

-------
Internal Combustion Engines

     Eleven stationary internal combustion engines [Appendix D] are used
to drive compressors and use natural gas at a rate of 1,120 m  (39.5 X
103 ft3)/hour.  These units are all  used in the vapor recovery and fuel
gas collection systems.  None of the internal combustion engines have
emission control equipment and none would be expected.
Storage Tanks

                                                    3            3
     The 523 storage tanks ranging in size from 14 m  to 18,300 m  (85
to 115,000 bbl), are used to store a wide variety of hydrocarbon materials.
Due to the volatile nature of some of these compounds, the potential
exists for substantial emissions of hydrocarbon vapors from these tanks.
Where this potential exists, the materials are stored in specially
constructed tanks, such as pressure vessels, and floating roof tanks, or
in tanks which are hard piped by manifold systems to vapor recovery
systems.

     The vapor recovery system consists of a pipe network serving a
large number of hydrocarbon storage tanks, two truck loading facilities,
and several additional connections at the LPG loading racks.  Vacuum is
maintained by a bank of compressors (discussed above) which discharge
into the refinery fuel gas system.  Standard Oil is in the process of
changing all tanks to floating roof tanks so that the vapor recovery
system will not be needed.

     A summary of the storage tanks at this facility, their configuration,
and the materials stored within is presented in Appendix E.

-------
                                                                     8
Slowdown Systems

     The majority of process units have emergency relief valves which
are connected to a manifolded header system.   Should a situation arise
such that it is necessary to rapidly release quantities of liquids and
gases from a unit, they are routed to the manifold system and ultimately
combusted in a flare.

     There are four flares at this refinery.   One flare vents the fluid
catalytic cracker, one the delayed coker, one the isomax complex, and
one at the ammonia plant.  All four flares are equipped with John Zink
Co. smokeless flare tips [Appendix F].  Most of the blowdown systems are
operated only on an as-needed basis, i.e., intermittently.

     In addition to the flare blowdown system, there are two other
systems used for vapor and liquid collection.

     The Rheniformer blowdown system (gasholder served by two recipro-
cating compressors) recovers both liquid and vapor hydrocarbons which
are returned to process.  Hydrocarbon vapor is released to the atmosphere
less than 0.1% of the time.

     The FCC unit blowdown system includes gas recovery facilities
                                                                  •
(gasholder served by two reciprocating compressors) which return blow-
down vapors to the FCC process.  This system recovers liquid and vapor
from various sources in the refinery.  Liquids are returned to recovered
oil storage.  Vapors are compressed and routed to FLS recovery, thence
to the refinery process gas system.  If compressor capacity is exceeded
(estimated aggregate 2 hours/year) the gasholders blowdown tanks vent to
atmosphere.

-------
Vacuum Jets

     Vacuum distillation columns at No.  1  crude unit and Nos.  1  and 2
vacuum distillation units are provided with 2-stage vacuum jets  which
are operated by 150 psig steam.  The condensate collected is injected
into the crude feed lines at No. 1  and No. 2 crude units while the non-
condensed gas is collected by the waste gas compressors and routed to
downstream treating facilities.  The waste gas system recovery efficiency
is 100%.

     Column C-1410 is provided with 2-stage vacuum jets which are
powered by 150 psig steam.  All liquid and vapor is recovered to Crack-
ing Division blowdown system for recovery.

     No barometric condensers are operated at the refinery.
Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit

     Spent catalyst from the FCC unit is continuosly removed from the
reactor portion and introduced through piping into the catalyst regenera-
tion portion.  Here the petroleum coke, tars, and other residual deposits
which form on the catalyst surface are burned off the catalyst fines.
The recovered catalyst is then recycled to the reactor.  Catalyst particles
which are entrained in the exhaust gases are partially captured by a
series of cyclone separators internal and external to the regenerator
unit.  Particles captured by these cyclones are returned to the regenerator.

     The regenerator unit exhaust gases contain considerable amounts of
carbon monoxide, particulate matter, aldehydes, sulfur oxides, ammonia,
and oxides of nitrogen.  To minimize the emissions of particulates and
carbon monoxide (CO) and recover the fuel value of this material, the
regenerator exhaust gases are routed through an electrostatic precipitator

-------
                                                                    10

(ESP) consisting of two parallel  banks with four stages  per bank,  and
into the CO boiler where these gases are combusted.   The ESP and CO
boiler were rebuilt in 1974.

     The discharge stack at the CO boiler is equipped with a Lear
Seigler opacity monitor.  This monitor has a recorder and alarm system
in the FCC unit control room.

     The FCC unit and ESP are  also served by a bypass discharge stack,
and if the CO boiler is not in operation the FCC could continue to
operate.  If Standard chooses  this bypass operation, except in an emergency,
they would be in violation of  LAAPCD Rule 71 and would require a variance
to continue operating.


Product Loading Racks

     LP gas, various grades of gasoline, solvents, jet fuel, diesel
fuel, and light and heavy distillates are all shipped from the refinery
by truck or rail car.  Except  for the diesel fuel and the light and
heavy distillates, all of these materials have vapor pressures greater
                o
than 0.105 kg/cm  (1.5 psia) at actual loading conditions.  Hence, the
loading racks for these materials must be equipped with vapor recovery
systems.

     The truck and rail loading racks for LP gas use an equalizing line
during loading.  After the filling operation is completed, the loading
hoses are back-evacuated through the vapor recovery system.

     The truck loading facilities, requiring controls per Rule 61, for
gasoline, solvent, and jet fuel loading are equipped with tight neoprene
seals for the truck hatches and vapor return lines to the main vapor
recovery system.  The recovery system discharges into the refinery fuel
gas system.

-------
                                                                    11
Vlastewater Treatment Facilities

     The 22,600 m3 (5.8 X 106 gal)/day of wastewater is collected
through several covered, but venting to the atmosphere, API* oil-water
separators at various locations throughout the refinery.   From the
separators, the water is treated in an air flotation unit and discharged
into the Pacific Ocean.  Standard is currently building an activated
sludge unit to further treat these wastes.

     There are no air pollution controls or monitors, other than the
covers, on the API separators.  The LAAPCD has stated these separators
are in compliance with Rule 59.
Sulfur Plant

     There are three 2-stage Claus units [Fig. 2] at the sulfur recovery
plant.  Each is rated at 136 m. tons (150 tons)/SD of elemental sulfur.
Normal operations necessitate that only two units be on stream at any
time with the third unit being held in reserve.

     Standard is currently constructing a fourth Claus unit to serve the
new low sulfur fuel oil facility.  This unit should be on-stream by mid-
1976.  The capacity of this new unit is 272 m. tons (300 tons)/day.

     In the Claus process, hydrogen sulfide (hLS) is burned to form
sulfur dioxide (S02).  The S02 and H2$ react in the presence of a
bauxite catalyst to form elemental sulfur and water vapor.   Typical
sulfur recovery efficiencies for Claus plants are 85% for one catalytic
stage, 94% for two stages.
*  American Petroleum Institute

-------
ACID GAS FROM

AHINE REGEN- ~

ERATOR AND SOUR

WATER STRIPPER
               otr
               So
    SOUR WATER
 SOUR WATER SURGE
  TOTREATOENT
                               SECONDARY CONVERTER
                                        STEAM
WASTE HEAT>
  BURNER
                                      PRIMARY CONVERTER.
   ^^        \
                                                                  STEAM'
                                                                      CONDENSERS-
                                           	f

                                                  I
    r-
—i—I
    h-
    -l_
    u.
                                                   BOILER FEED WATER
                             AIR BLOWER
                                                          STEAM.
                                                               Q
                                                                         \	"rr^..
                                  Figure   2
                                               SULFUR TANK AND SUMP PUMP


                      Typical packaged claus plant (2 stage).
                                           .TAIL GAS TO
                                            INCINERATOR OR

                                            TAIL GAS PROCESSINC
                                                                                  •UQUID'SULFUR pROlucT
                                                                                                                                         IN3

-------
•INCINERATOR
FUEL
GAS
             CLAUS
           'TAIL-GAS
          H.P. STEAM
    B.F.
   WATER-
        WASTE HEAT
          BOILER
                             QUENCH AND GAS
                             COOLING SECTION
                                      RECYCLE
                                   QUENCH WATER
SO; ABSORBER.         EVAPORATOR    .DISSOLVING1
	    .AND STEAM STRIPPING    TANK

        FUELAfR   TO STACK
         il
                                     ACID WATER PURGE
                                     TO NEUTRALIZATION
                                                                                                                         RECYCLE TO
                                                                                                                        CLAUS PLANT
                          Figure  ,3    Flow diagram for the Wei I man-Lord S02 recovery process.
                                                                                                                                          CO

-------
                                                                     14
     The tail-gases from the Claus unit are then processed in a Wellman-
Lord unit [Fig. 3] for further sulfur removal.

     In this unit, tail-gas from the Claus sulfur units is first in-
cinerated to convert all of the sulfur compounds originally present
(H2S, COS, CS2> etc.) to S02-  The hot gases are cooled in a waste heat
boiler, then quenched and fed to the S02 absorber.

     The absorber is fed a lean solution of sodium sulfite which absorbs
the S02 by reacting with it to form sodium bisulfite.  The clean gases
pass to the stack, while the rich bisulfite solution is fed to an
evaporator/ crystallizer regeneration system.  S02 and water vapor pass
overhead from the evaporator to a condenser.  A knockout drum separates
condensed water for return to the absorbent dissolving tank and the
product steam of concentrated, saturated SCL is piped back to the Claus
plant feed or to other processing.

     This refinery has three absorption units, one for each Claus unit,
and only one chemical regeneration plant.  It is important to note that
each of the tail gas units is designed to handle the total off-gas flow
from all three Claus plants.

     Once per shift, a sample of the absorber off-gas is taken and
analyzed by a gas chromatograph (GC).
Sulfuric Acid Regeneration Plant

     The major potential emission point at the sulfuric acid plant [Fig.
4] is the exhaust stack.  The Lurgi double absorption process is used as an
air pollution control measure.  The double absorption process achieves a
99.7% conversion of S02 to SOj.   The off-gases from the second absorber

-------
BOILER
FEED
WATER ,


SStifr
                            EXCHANGER
                            EXCHANGER
PURIFICATION
   UNIT
                                     *r xt*
X
       DRYING
       TOWER
                             COOLER
                                          r—
                                               V. "
                                                       CONVERTER
                                                         WITH
                                                      INTERCOOLERS
                                                      ^r






^




/




\
/

1

/
\

•>)
1
1
1
I'
1
1



^
1
^ 	 1* — »



>




<




ABSO
TC




RPTIO
IWER

                                                                         *  OLEUM

                                                                         I   TOWER
                                                         i
                                                         I	^ TAIL
                                                              GAS
                                                                 COOLER
                                                                                        ACID
                                                                                        PRODUCTS
        ©INCLUDES COMBUSTION UNIT WHEN USING  SLUDGE, PYRITE  OR H2 S.


        (A) STEAM IS GENERATED ONLY WHEN BURNING SLUDGE OR H2S.


                                            FIGURE 4



                                 SULFURIC ACID PLANT FLOW DIAGRAM

-------
                                                                     16
are contacted with a small amount of low pressure steam prior to being
discharged  through a Brink mist eliminator.

     All sulfuric acid regenerated is used within the refinery.


Other Sources

     All off-gases from the sour water strippers and oxidizers are
burned In the process heaters.

     Standard produces asphalt and has blow stills on site; however, no
asphalt air blowing is currently done.

     No incinerators are in operation at this refinery.


EMISSIONS DATA

Source Test Data

     NEIC personnel requested that Standard supply copies of all stack
tests conducted at the facility since 1972.  The LAAPCD was requested to
do likewise.  The data obtained is summarized below.

     FCC Unit Emissions.  Standard submitted a copy of the source test
(test C-2241) conducted on the CO boiler exhaust stack attendant to the
FCC unit electrostatic precipitator (ESP).   This test was conducted on
February 25, 1975 by the LAAPCD [Appendix 6].   No details are given for
the operating conditions for the FCC unit and/or the CO boiler during
the test run.  It also is not possible to determine from the data
whether the test was conducted at start-of-run conditions on the FCC
unit or near the turnaround time.

-------
                                                                     17
     According to the LAAPCD test results, the total  emissions from the
stack of the ESP unit amounted to 4,400 dry m3/min.  (155,300 dscfm) and
a particualte emission rate of 6.9 kg (15.5 lb)/hr.   The other compounds
found were 249 ppmv S02» 54 kg (119 lb)/hr NOX and 0.013% vol CO.   These
test results indicate that this unit was in compliance with the LAAPCD
rules.

     From July 1972 to June 1973, Standard participated in a comprehensive
study of oxides of nitrogen (N0¥) emissions from stationary sources in
                               A
the South Coast Air Basin.  The study was conducted by KVB Engineering,
Inc. under contract to the State of California Air Resources Board
(ARB).  These data are coded, and determining which come from the
Standard processes is difficult.

     Process Heaters and Boilers.  Exhaust gases from four process
heaters and two process steam boilers were analyzed for NOX emissions
during the previously referenced KVB Engineering, Inc. study.

     Sulfur Recovery Plant.  The exhaust  gases from each of  the three
Wellman-Lord  tail-gas unit, at the sulfur recovery plant, were source
tested  (test  C-1895) by the LAAPCD [Appendix  H] on January  10-11,  1973.
The  results of  these tests are summarized below.
          Emissions    Plant  1          Plant  2           Plant  3
                      62  ppmv          38  ppmv           40  ppmv
               !.3  kg  (5.1  lb)/hr   0.9 kg (2.0  lb)/hr   0.8 kg  (1.8 lb)/hr
                    9.7  DDtnv
so2
so2
NO           9.7 ppmv
  n
H2S        <0.10 ppmv       <0.4 ppmv            1.5 ppmv
CO          0.05% v          0.2% v              0.07% v

-------
                                                                     18
      At the time of these  tests  the  sulfur recovery  units  were  in  com-
 pliance with the LAAPCD rules.

      Sulfuric Acid Plant  The exhaust  gases from  the sulfuric acid plant
 were  source tested (test C-1920)  by  the  LAAPCD  [Appendix I]  on  March  21
 and April  3, 1973.   The March 21  test  was  aborted due to an  upset
 condition  at the sulfur plant.   Only S02 and S03  were tested for,  and
 the emissions from the  discharge  stack contained  120 ppmv  and 9.0  kg
 (20.1  lb)/hr S02 and the SOg was  lower than the detectable limit.   At
 the time of this test the  sulfuric acid  regeneration plant was  operating
 at 240 m.  tons  (265 tons)/day (88% capacity).   There were  no violations
 of LAAPCD  rules  during  this test.
Computed Emission Rates

     Theoretical emission factors for various emission sources found at
petroleum refineries are listed in Table 1.1-1 on page 1.1-3 of the EPA
publication AP-42 Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors, Second
Edition (second printing with Supplements 1-4).  These emission factors
were used to compute emission rates in Table 2.  Emissions from hydro-
carbon storage tanks have not been calculated for this report.  They
will be included in a separate report being prepared by NEIC which will
summarize storage tank emissions from all refineries in Los Angeles
County.

     Boilers and Process Heaters.   As can be seen from the listing of
process heaters and steam boilers  shown in Appendix C, a substantial
number of these units can be fired with both fuel gas and fuel oil.
Also, several  of the units are either out of service or are on standby.
Theoretical  emissions from these units are calculated using different
factors for each fuel type used.   It can be seen that a wide range of

-------
                                                                    Table 2

                                            CALCULATED EMISSION RATES FROM VARIOUS UNIT OPERATIONS
                                            STANDARD OIL COMPANy - EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA, REFINERY
Emission Source
Calculated Emissions
Particulates
(kg/hr)(lb/hr)
Process Heaters
and Boilers
!«
Fluid Catalytic
Cracking Unit
Compressor Internal
Combustion Engines
Slowdown Systems to
Vapor Recovery or
Flares
Wastewater Treatment
Pipeline Valves
and Flanges
Vessel Relief Valves
Pump Seals
Compressor Seals
TOTALSt+t
63 140
212 470
36 80
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
248 550
Sulfur Oxides Carbon Monoxide Hydrocarbons
(S02) (CO)
(kg/hr)(lb/hr) (kg/hr)(lb/hr)
7 15
756 1 ,680
400 890
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
1.156 2,570
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
(kg/hr)(lb/hr)
95
36
180
23
23
20
122
47
72
23
555
210
80
400
50
50
45
270
105
160
50
1,210
Nitrogen Oxides
(N02)
(kg/hr)(lb/hr)
734 1 .630
725 1,610
59 130
16 35
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
Neg.
799 1 ,775
Aldehydes Ammonia
(kg/hr)(lb/hr) (kg/hr)(lb/hr)
9 20 Neg.
7 15 Neg.
16 35 45
244
Neg. Neg.
Neg. Neg.
Neg. Neg.
Neg. Neg.
Neg. Neg.
Neg. Neg.
24 54 49

100
8






108
  t  Mode 1.   All units operated and all on fuel gas
 tt  Mode 2.   All units in refinery operated and those units which can are burning fuel oil
ttt  Totals include only situation (2)  for boilers and process heaters.   Considered worst possible operating mode.

-------
                                                                    20
emissions can exist, depending on the available fuel situation.  Table 2
summarizes the theoretical emissions for two possible situations:  1)
all units are in operation (100% capacity) and all units are fueled with
fuel gas; and 2)  all units are in operation and fuel gas is curtailed
so that fuel oil is being used in those units which can use oil, i.e.,
all operating on oil.  Realizing that a wide variety of unit/fuel com-
binations exist, for this analysis, situation (1) is considered the most
frequent operating mode, and situation (2) an operating mode which is
possible but used infrequently during fuel gas curtailment.  For these
calculations, the heat content of refinery fuel gas was assumed to be
9,000 cal/m3 (1,100 Btu/ft3) and that of the fuel oil to be 9,860 cal/m3
(148,000 Btu/gal).

     The process heaters and boilers are major contributors of nitrogen
oxides.  Depending on the fuel use pattern at the refinery, calculated
nitrogen dioxide emissions for these units range from 725 to 734 kg
(1,610 to 1,630 lb)/hr as N02-  If the refinery is on fuel gas curtail-
ment, these units are also potential large sources of particulate
matter, 210 kg (470 lb)/hr and sulfur oxides, 760 kg (1,680 lb)/hr as
so2.

     Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit.  Table 2 summarizes the calculated
theoretical emissions from this unit.  These theoretical emissions were
also calculated using AP-42 emission factors for FCC units with attendant
CO boilers and electrostatic precipitators.  The calculated value for
particulate emissions using the average emission factor value listed in
AP-42 is 36 kg (80 lb)/hr.  This value is in excess of the maximum
allowable emission rate under the LAAPCD Rule 54 which is 13.5 kg (30
lb)/hr.  However, it should be emphasized that the AP-42 emission factor
is an average value for the industry and that the Standard precipitator
may be more efficient than the average unit.  The LAAPCD test in February
1975 indicated a much lower emission rate, well within the limitations
of Rule 54.

-------
                                                                     21
     The calculated emission rates for other pollutants from the FCC
unit indicate that substantial amounts of sulfur dioxide, hydrocarbon,
and nitrogen dioxide are emitted from this unit.  The calculated theoretical
values are 400 kg (890 lb)/hr, 180 kg (400 lb)/hr and 59 kg (130 lb)/hr,
respectively.

     Other Sources.  Table 2 summarizes the calculated theoretical
emission rates from other sources within the refinery.  In general, AP-
42 gives only hydrocarbon emission factors for these sources.   The major
source appears to be leakage from pipeline valves and flanges  which
amounts to 122 kg (270 lb)/hr.
SUMMARY OF VIOLATIONS

     A review of the LAAPCD records indicates there have been no citations
issued to Standard since late 1973.


INSPECTION SUMMARY

     At the time of this inspection, all major process units were in
operation with the exception of the sulfuric acid plant, No. 1  crude
unit.  Also, only one Claus unit was operating.

     All process units, storage vessels, potential pollution emission
points and pollution control devices in use at the refinery were observed
during the inspection.   No visible emissions were detected from any of
the process heaters or incinerators.  The flare  systems also appeared to
be operating correctly.

     During the physical tour of the refinery, Mr. Daily indicated that
Standard had a variance for the elemental sulfur storage tank.   He

-------
                                                                    22
stated that at times there were visible emissions from these tanks.
Standard is currently attempting to find a solution to this problem.  No
visible emissions were noted during this inspection.

     The GC analysis of the sulfur recovery tail  gas  showed that the
unit was emitting 100 ppmv S0« at the time the sample was taken.
General housekeeping at the refinery is excellent.  The main process
areas were neat with no noticeable spills, leaks, etc.

-------
             APPENDIX A

NEIC INFORMATION REQUEST LETTER TO
           STANDARD OIL

-------
                ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                      OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
           NATIONAL FIELD INVESTIGATIONS CENTER-DENVER
               BUILDING 53, BOX 25227. DENVER FEDERAL CENTER
                       DENVER. COLORADO  80225
                        September 8, 1975
 Dear

      Pursuant to the authority contained in Section 114 of the Clean Air
 Act, as amended, representatives of the EPA will conduct, within the
 next year,  inspections of the Allied Chemical Corp. operations to
 ascertain compliance with the Federally approved California State
 Implementation Plan.

      Representatives from the Environmental Protection Agency will
 observe the facility's process operations, inspect monitoring and
 laboratory equipment and analytical methods, review source test data,
•examine appropriate records, etc.  A process and air pollution flow
 diagram or a blueprint of the facility and production information should
 be available for the EPA personnel at the start of the inspections.

      Detailed information about air pollution sources will be discussed
 during  these inspections.  Attached is a partial list of the information
 that will be needed in order to complete these inspections.  We would
 appreciate it if you could inform the appropriate company personnel
 about the forthcoming inspections so that the necessary information will
 be readily available and the inspection can be expedited.

      If you have any questions concerning these inspections, please feel
 free to contact Arnold Den, Chief, Air Investigations Section, Region
 IX,  San Francisco, at 415/556-8752.

    • A  representative of the EPA (Dr.  Wayne Smith or Mr. David Brooman,
 303/234-4658) will contact you within the next 30 days concerning this
 Visit.
                                             Sincerely,
                                             Thomas P.  Gallagher
                                             Director
Attachments

-------
A.  Refinery Capacity in Barrels/Day

B.  Furnaces, Boilers and Process Heaters  (for each furnace  boiler
    and heater)

    1.  Rated capacity in 106 BTU/hr heat  Input.
    2,  Maximum capacity as per cent of  rated capacity.
    3.  For oil fired units:

        a;  Rated capacity in gals/hr or 10^  bbl/hr.
        b.  Heating value in BTU's/gal.
        c.  Per cent sulfur and ash in oil by wt.
        d.  Specific gravity of oil.
        e.  Firing pattern (atomization, etc. for  furnaces).

    4.  For gas fired units:
                                *>
        a.  Rated capacity in 1Q  SCF/hr.
        b.  Type of gas burned (list principal constituents  in % by
            weight).
        c.  Density Ib/SCF.
        d.  Heating value of gas in BTU's/SCF.
        e.  Sulfur content of gas in % S by vol and grains/SCF.

    5.  Type(s) of control equipment and collection efficiency(s)
        (design and actual).
    6.  Pressure drop (inches of water)  across collection devices(s)
    7.  Elevation above grade of stack outlets and other  discharge
        points.
    8.  Identification of stacks equipped  with recording  monitors
        for determining opacities of stack effluents.
    9.  Existing stack test data.  The full test reports  describing
        methods used, test data, calculations, test results  and
        process weights should be available.
   10.  Inside diameters of each stack (ft).
   11.  Temperature of effluent gas stream from each stack (°F).
   12.  Exit velocity of each stack effluent  (ft/sec).

C.  Incinerators:  (For each incinerator)

    1.  Rated capacity in 106 BTU's/hr;  include auxiliary burners
        separately.
    2.  Auxiliary burner fuels:
        oil - 10~ bbl/hr and specific gravity.
        gas - 103 SCF/hr and density in  Ib/SCF.
        other - (describe) - Ibs/hr (Heating  value of each fuel).

-------
                                  -2-

    3.  Maximum capacity as per cent of rated capacity for  auxiliary
        burners.
    4.  Sulfur and ash content of fuel as % by weight  for auxiliary
        burners.
    5.  Type of material incinerated.
    6.  Rated capacity for material incinerated in Ib/hr.
    7.  Sulfur and ash content of material incinerated as % by weight.
    8.  Heating value of material incinerated.
    9.  The gas flow rate reported at dry standard conditions  (DSCFH).
   10.  Type(s) of control equipment and collection efficiency(s)
        (design and actual).
   11.  Pressure drop (inches of water) across collection device(s).
   12.  Elevation above grade of stack outlets and other discharge
        points (ft).
   13.  Identification of stacks equipped with recording monitors
        for determining opacities of stack effluents.
   14.  Existing stack test data.  Data should include the  full test
        reports describing methods used, test data,  calculations,
        test results and process weights.
   15.  Inside diameter of each stack (ft).
   16.  Exit velocity of each stack effluent (ft/sec.).
   17.  Temperature of effluent gas stream from each stack  in  °F.

D.  Catalytic Cracking Units, Coker Units:  (For each  unit)

    1.  Rated capacity - 106 BTU/hr and indicate the type of unit  such
        as FCC, Coker, etc.
    2.  Maximum capacity as per cent of rated capacity.
    3.  Type of feed-stock used and barrels of fresh feed used per yr.
    4.  Sulfur content of feed-stock (% by weight).
    5.  Types of control equipment and collection efficiency(s)  (design
        and actual).
    6.  Pressure drop (inches of water) across collection devices(s).
    7.  Elevation above grade of stack outlets and other discharge
        points (ft).
    8.  Identification of stacks equipped with recording monitors
        for determining opacities of stack effluents.
    9.  Existing stack test data.  Data should include the  full test
        reports describing methods used, test data,  calculations,  test
        results and process weights.
   10.  Inside diameter of each stack (ft).
  - 11.  Exit velocity of each stack effluent (ft/sec).
   12.  Total flow through unit in 103 bbl/hr and ton/hr.
   13.  Temperature of effluent gas stream from each stack  in  °F.
   14.  Indicate disposition of waste gas stream,  i.e., burned in
        afterburner, etc.

-------
                                  -3-

   15.  Average hours of operation per month and average monthly
        catalyst makeup for the catalytic cracking units.
   16.  Indicate date of installation or latest modification.

E.  Slowdown Systems:

    1.  Indicate type and efficiency of each air pollution control
        device.

F.  Flares:  (For each flare)

    1.  Type
    2.  Height and diameter of stack (ft).
    3.  Velocity of stack effluent (ft/sec).
    4.  Temperature of gas effluent (°F).
    5.  Rated capacity 10^ BTU/hr and tons/hr (of flared material).
    6.  Amount of material flared and percent of time material  being
        flared.
    7.  Maximum capacity as per cent of rated capacity.
    8.  Type of flare ignition device at top of stack.
    9.  Sulfur content of flared input (% by wt).
   10.  Where material comes from that is burned in  flare.

G.  Storage Vessels:  (For each vessel)

    1.  Indicate type of tank (fixed roof,  floating  roof,  vapor recovery,
        etc.)
    2.  Give storage capacity of each tank in 1(P gallons  or  barrels.
    3.  Indicate type of material stored in each tank  (crude  oil, gasoline,
        finished petroleum product) and give annual  average true vapor
        pressure (TV?) and seasonal maximum for actual  storage  condition
        of product stored in Ibs/sq. in. absolute.
    4.  State tank diameter (ft).
    5.  Indicate if tank is equipped with submerged  fill pipe.
    6.  Indicate if the tank is a pressure tank capable of maintaining
        working pressure sufficient at all times to  prevent vapor or gas
        loss to the atmosphere.
    7.  State type of air pollution control equipment on each tank,  i.e.,
        conservation vent, vapor recovery system, etc.
    8.  Indicate average and seasonal maximum temperature  of  each tank.
    9.  Indicate date of installation or latest modifications.
   10.  Indicate if tank is used for multiple product storage.

H.  Wastewater Treatment Systems:

    1.  Indicate gallons of waste water discharged daily.
    2.  Indicate source of such drains (process discharged).

-------
                                  -4-

    3.  Indicate type and efficiency of  each air pollution control
        device and any existing test data  indicating actual emissions.
        Data should include the full test  reports describing methods
        used, test data,  calculations, test results and process weight.

I.  Internal Combustion Engines:   (Stationary)

    1.  Type of engine.
    2.  Amount of fuel burned per day.
    3.  Type of fuel.

J.  Vacuum Jets and/or Barometric Condensers

    1.  Indicate type and efficiency of  each air pollution control
        device.
    2.  Indicate disposition of exhaust  gases-(eg. To  afterburners,
        fireboxes, etc.).

K.  Loading Rack Vapor Recovery:

    1.  Actual product throughput in 10  gallons per day  and year.
    2.  Type of material loaded.
    3.  Type of vapor recovery system and  rated collection efficiency.
    4.  Existing test data.  The full test reports describing  methods
        used, test data,  calculations and  test results should  be
        submitted.

L.  Submit schematic diagrams showing stacks and their respective
    process associations and control equipment.

M.  List any other significant (25 tons/yr. potential  uncontrolled
    emission) sources of participates, sulfur dioxide, carbon  monoxide,
    oxides of nitrogen, and hydrocarbons not covered by Items  B-L.
    Include:

    1.  Type of process and rated capacity.
    2.  Type of material processed.
    3.  Types of collection equipment and  collection efficiency(s)
        (design and actual).
    4.  Pressure drop (inches of water)  across collection devices.
    5.  Existing stack test data applicable to current operating
        conditions.  The full test reports describing  methods  used,
        test data, calculations,  test results and process weights
        should be submitted.

-------
             APPENDIX B




SELECT LAAPCD RULES AND REGULATIONS

-------
               APPENDIX B
County of Los Angeles
Air Pollution Control District

-------
     IV
Prohibitions

-------
 Rule 50.   Ringelmann Chart.
     (Effective January 6, 1972 for any source not completed and put into
service. Effective for all sources on January 1, 1973.)
     A person shall  not  discharge into  the  atmosphere from  any single
source of emission whatsoever any air contaminant for a period  or periods
aggregating more than three minutes in any one hour which is:
     a.   As dark or darker in shade as that designated No. 1 on the Ringel-
mann Chart, as published by the United States Bureau of Mines,  or
     b.  Of such opacity as to obscure an  observer's view to a  degree
equal to or greater  than  does smoke described  in subsection (a) of this
Rule.
     This amendment shall be effective on the date of its adoption for any
source of emission not then completed and put into service. As to all other
sources of emission this amendment shall  be effective on January 1,  1973.
   Rule 51. Nuisance.
        A person  shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quanti-
   ties of air contaminants or other material which cause  injury,  detriment,
   nuisance or annoyance to any considerable  number of  persons or to the
   public or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such
   persons or the public or which cause  or have a natural tendency to cause
   injury or damage to business or property.
   Rule 52.. Particulate Matter • Concentration.
       {Effective January 6,  1972 for any equipment not completed and put
   into service.  Effective  for all equipment on January  1, 1973.)
       A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere from any source par-
   ticulate matter  in excess of the concentration shown  in the following table:
   (See Rule 52 Table)
       Where the volume discharged falls between figures listed in the table,
   the exact concentration permitted to be discharged shall  be determined by
   linear interpolation.
       The provisions of this rule shall not apply to emissions resulting from
   the combustion of liquid or gaseous fuels in steam generators or gas turbines.
        For the purposes of this rule "particulate matter" includes any material
   which would become  particulate matter if cooled to standard conditions.
       This amendment shall  be effective on the date of its adoption for  any

-------
equipment not then completed and put into service. As to all other equip-
ment this amendment shall be effective on January 1, 1973.
                          Table For Rule 52
Volume Discharged-
Cubie Feet Per Minute
Calculated as Dry Gas
at Standard Conditions


1000 or less
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
10000
15000
Maximum Concentra-
tion of Paniculate Mat-
ter Allowed in Dis-
charged Gas-Grains Per
Cubic Foot of Dry Gas
at Standard Conditions
0.200
.187
.176
.167
.160
.153
.141
.131
.124
.118
.108
.101
.0949
.0902
.0828
.0709
Volume Discharged-
Cubic Feet Per Minute
Calculated as Dry Gas
at Standard Conditions


20000
30000
40000
50000
60000
70000
80000
100000
200000
400000
600000
800000
Maximum Concentra-
tion of Parliculdie Mat-
ter Allowed in DIS-
chared Gas-Grams Per
Cubic Foot of Dry Gas
at Standard Conditions
0.0635
.0544
.0487
.0447
.0417
.0393
.0374
.0343
.0263
.0202
.0173
.0155
1000000 .0142
1500000 .0122
2000000 .0109
2500000 or more .0100
 Rule 53. Sulfur Compounds - Concentration.
     A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere sulfur compounds,
 which would  exist  as a liquid or gas at standard conditions, exceeding in
 concentration at  the point of discharge. 0.2 per cent by volume calculated
 as sulfur dioxide  (SC>2).

 Rule 53.1.  Scavenger Plants.
     Where a separate source of air pollution is  a scavenger or recovery

-------
plant, recovering pollutants which would otherwise be emitted to the atmos-
phere, the Air Pollution  Control Officer  may  grant a  permit  to  operate
where the total emission of pollutants is substantially less with the  plant in
operation than when closed,  even  though the concentration exceeds that
permitted by Rule 53(a).  The Air Pollution Control Officer shall report
immediately  in writing  to the Air  Pollution Control Board the  granting of
any such permit, together with the  facts and reasons therefor.
     Effective July 1, 1973, this Rule is repealed for sulfur recovery  units.
     Effective January 1, 1974, this Rule is repealed for sulfuric acid  units.

Rule 53.2. Sulfur Recovery Units.
     A person shall not, after  June  30, 1973, discharge into the atmosphere
from  any sulfur recovery unit producing elemental  sulfur, effluent process
gas containing more than:
     1.   500 parts per million by volume of sulfur compounds calculated
         as sulfur dioxide.
     2.    10 parts per million by volume of hydrogen sulfide.
     3.   200 pounds per hour of sulfur compounds calculated as  sulfur
         dioxide.
    Any sulfur recovery unit  having an effluent process gas discharge con-
taining less than 10 pounds per hour of sulfur compounds calculated as sul-
fur dioxide may dilute to meet the provision of number (1) above.

Rule 53.3. Sulfuric Acid Units.
    A person shall not, after  December 31,1973. discharge into the atmos-
phere from any sulfuric  acid unit, effluent process gas containing more  than:
     1.   500 parts per million by  volume of sulfur compounds calculated
         as sulfur dioxide.
     2.   200 pounds per hour of sulfur compounds calculated  as sulfur
          dioxide.

-------
Rule 54. Solid Paniculate Matter • Weight.

     (Effective January 6. 1972 for any equipment not completed and put
into service. Effective for all equipment on January 1, 1973.)

     A person shall not  discharge into the atmosphere from  any source

solid paniculate matter, including lead and lead compounds, in excess of

the rate shown in  the following table: (See Rule 54 Table)
                          TABLE FOR RULE 54
                           (Amended January 6. 1972)
Process Weight
Per Hour-
Pounds Per Hour
   250 or less
   300
   350
   400

   450
   500
   600
   700

   800
   900
  1000
  1200

  1400
  1600
  1800
  2000

  2500
  3000
  3500
  4000

   4500
   5000
   5500
   6000

   6500
   7000
   7500
   8000
   8500
   9000
   9500
  10000
Maximum Discharge
Rate Allowed for Solid
Paniculate Matter
(Aggregate Discharged
From All Points of
Processl-Pounds
Per Hour
     1.00
     1.12
     1.23
     1.34

     1.44
     1.54
     1.73
     1.90

     2.07
     2.22
     2.38
     2.66

     2.93
     3.19
     3.43
     3.66

     4.21
     4.72
     5.19
     5.64

     6.07
     6.49
      6.89
      7.27

      7.64
      8.00
      8.36
      8.70

      9.04
      9.36
       9.68
     10.00
Process Weight
Per Hour-
Pounds Per Hour




12000
14000
16000
18000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
60000
70000
80000
90000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
250000
300000
350000
400000
450000
5000QO
600000
700000
800000
900000
1000000 or
Maximum Discharge
Rate Allowed for Solid
Particular Matter
(Aggregate Discharged
From All Points of
Processl-Pounds
Per Hour
10.4
10.8
11.2
11.5
11.8
12.4
13.0
13.5
13.9
14.3
14.7
15.3
15.9
16.4
16.9
17.3
18.1
18.8
19.4
19.9
20.4
21.6
22.5
23.4
24.1
24.8
25.4
26.6
27.6
28.4
29.3
more 30.0

-------
     Where the process weight  per hour falls between figures listed in the
table, the exact weight of permitted discharge shall be determined by linear
interpolation.
     For the purposes of this rule "solid particulate matter" includes any
material which would become solid particulate matter if cooled to standard
conditions.
     This amendment shall be effective on the date of its adoption for any
equipment  not then completed  and put  into service.  As to all other equip-
ment this amendment shall be effective  on January 1, 1973.

Rule 55.   Exceptions.
     The provisions of  Rule  50 do not apply to:
         a.   Smoke from fires set by or permitted by any public officer
     if such fire is set or permission given in the performance of the official
     duty of such officer, and such fire in  the  opinion of  such officer is
     necessary:
              1.   For  the  purpose of  the  prevention  of  a  fire hazard
                   which  cannot  be abated by any other means, or
              2.   The instruction of public employees in the methods of
                   fighting fire.
         b.   Smoke  from fires set pursuant to permit on  property used
     for industrial purposes for the  purpose of  instruction of employees in
     methods of fighting fire.
         c.   Agricultural operations in the growing of crops, or raising of
     fowls oranimals.
         d.   The use of an orchard or citrus grove heater which does not
     produce unconsumed solid carbonaceous matter at a rate in excess of
     one(1) gram per minute.

          e.    The use of other equipment in agricultural operations in the
      growing of crops, or raising of fowls or animals.

-------
Rule 56. Storage of Petroleum Products.
     A person shall not place,  store or hold in any stationary tank, reser-
voir or other container of more than 40,000 gallons capacity any gasoline
or any petroleum distillate having a vapor pressure of 1.5 pounds per square
inch absolute or greater under actual storage conditions, unless such tank,
reservoir or other container is a pressure tank maintaining working pressures
sufficient at all times to prevent hydrocarbon vapor or gas loss to the atmos-
phere, or is designed and equipped with one of the following vapor loss con-
trol devices, properly installed, in good working order and in operation:
         a.  A floating roof, consisting of a pontoon type or double-deck
     type roof, resting on the  surface of the liquid contents and equipped
     with a closure seal, or seals, to close the space  between the roof edge
     and tank wall.  The  control equipment provided for in this paragraph
     shall not be used if the gasoline or petroleum distillate has a vapor pres-
     sure of 11.0 pounds per square inch absolute or greater under actual
     Storage conditions. All tank gauging and sampling devices shall be gas-
     tight except when gauging or sampling is taking place.
         b.   A vapor recovery system,  consisting of a vapor gathering sys-
     tem capable of collecting the hydrocarbon vapors and gases discharged
     and a vapor disposal system capable of processing  such hydrocarbon
     vapors and gases so as to prevent their emission to the atmosphere and
     with all tank gauging and sampling devices gas-tight  except when gaug-
     ing or sampling is taking place.
         C.   Other equipment of equal efficiency, provided such equip-
     ment  is submitted to and  approved by the Air Pollution Control  Offi-
     cer.

-------
Rule 58.   Disposal of Solid and  Liquid  Wastes.
     a.   A person shall not burn any combustible refuse in any incinerator
except in a multiple-chamber incinerator as described in Rule 2 (p), or in
equipment found by the Air Pollution Control Officer in advance of such
use to be equally effective for  the purpose of air pollution control  as an
approved multiple-chamber incinerator.  Rule 58 (a) shall  be effective  in the
Los Angeles Basin on the date of its adoption, and in the  Upper Santa Clara
River Valley Basin on January  1.  1972.   In all other areas of Los Angeles
County, this Rule shall be effective on January 1, 1973.

     b.   A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere from any incin-
erator or other equipment used to dispose of combustible refuse by burn-
ing,  having design burning rates greater than 100 pounds per hour, except
as provided in subsection (d)  of this rule, particulate matter in excess of 0.1
grain per cubic foot of gas calculated to 12 per cent of carbon dioxide  (CC^)
at standard conditions. Any carbon dioxide (CC^)  produced by combustion
of any liquid or gaseous fuels shall be excluded from the calculation to 12
per cent of carbon dioxide (CO2).

     c.   A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere from any equip-
ment whatsoever, used to  process combustible refuse, except as provided in
subsection (d) of this rule, particulate matter in excess of  0.1 grain per
cubic foot of gas calculated to 12 per cent of carbon dioxide (C02) at
standard conditions.  Any carbon dioxide (C02) produced by combustion
of any liquid or gaseous fuels shall be excluded from the calculation to 12
per cent of carbon dioxide (C02).

     d.   A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere from any incin-
erator or other equipment used to dispose of combustible refuse  by burn-
ing, having design  burning rates of  100 pounds  per  hour or less,  or for
which an application for permit is filed  before Janaury 1, 1972, particulate
matter in excess of 0.3 grain per cubic foot of gas calculated  to  12 percent
of  carbon dioxide  (C02>  at standard conditions and  shall  not discharge
     x
particles which are individually large enough to be visible while suspended
in the atmosphere.  Any carbon dioxide (C02) produced by combustion of
any liquid or gaseous fuels shall be excluded from the calculation to 12 per
cent of carbon dioxide (C02).

-------
Rule 59. Effluent Oil Water Separators.
     (Effective June 29,  1971 for any equipment not completed and put
into service.  Effective for all equipment after July 1,  1972)
     A person shall not use any compartment of any vessel or device operat-
ed for the recovery of oil from effluent water which recovers 200 gallons a
day or more of any petroleum products from any equipment which proc-
esses,  refines, stores or handles hydrocarbons with a Reid vapor pressure
of 0.5 pound or greater, unless such compartment is equipped with one  of
the following vapor  loss control devices, except when gauging or sampling
is taking place:
         a.   A solid cover with  all  openings sealed  and totally enclosing
     the liquid contents of that compartment.
         b.   A floating pontoon or double-deck type cover, equipped
     with closure seals to enclose  any space between the cover's edye and
     compartment wall.
         c.   A vapor recovery system, which reduces the emission of all
     hydrocarbon  vapors and gases into the atmosphere by at least 90 per
     cent by weight.
         d.   Other equipment of an efficiency equal to  or greater than
     a,  b, or c, if approved by the Air Pollution Control  Officer.
     This rule shall  not apply to  any oil-effluent water separator used  ex-
clusively  in  conjunction  with the production of crude oil,  if the water
fraction of the oil-water effluent  entering  the separator contains less than
5 parts  per.  million hydrogen sulfide, organic sulfides,  or a  combination
thereof.
     This amendment shall  be effective at  the date of its adoption for any
equipment not then completed and put into service.  As to all other equip-
ment this amendment shall be effective on July  1,1972.

-------
Rule 60. Circumvention.
     A  person  shall  not build, erect, install, or use any article, machine,
equipment or other  contrivance,  the use of  which, without resulting  in a
reduction in the total  release of air contaminants to the atmosphere, re-
duces or conceals an emission which would otherwise constitute a violation
of Division  20, Chapter 2 of the Health and Safety  Code of the State of
California or of these Rules and Regulations. This Rule shall not apply to
cases in which the only violation  involved is of Section 24243 of the Health
and Safety Code of the State of California, or of Rule 51 of these Rules and
Regulations.
  Rule 61. Organic Liquid Loading.
       {Effective June 29, 1971  for any equipment not completed and put
  into service.  Effective for all equipment after July 1,  1972)
       A person shall  not load organic liquids having a vapor pressure of 1.5
  psia or greater under actual loading  conditions into any tank truck, trailer,
  or railroad tank car from any loading facility unless the loading facility is
  equipped with a vapor collection and disposal system or its equivalent ap-
  proved by the Air Pollution Control Officer.
       Loading  shall  be  accomplished  in such  a  manner that  all displaced
  vapor and air will be vented only to the vapor collection system.  Measures
  shall be taken to prevent liquid drainage from the loading device when it is
  not in use or to accomplish complete drainage before the loading device is
  disconnected.
       The vapor disposal  portion of the vapor collection and disposal system
  shall consist of one of the fallowing:
            a.   An absorber system or condensation system  which processes
       all vapors and  recovers at least 90 per cent by weight of the organic
       vapors and gases from the equipment being  controlled.
            b.   A vapor handling system which directs all vapors to a fuel gas
       system.
            c.   Other equipment of an efficiency equal to or greater than a
       or b if approved by the Air Pollution Control Officer.
       This rule shall  apply only to the loading of organic liquids having a

-------
vapor pressure of 1.5 psia or greater under actual loading  conditions at a
facility from which at least 20,000 gallons of such organic liquids are loaded
in any one day.
     "Loading facility", for  the purpose of this rule, shall mean any aggre-
gation or combination of organic  liquid  loading equipment which is both
0)  possessed by one person, and  (2) located so that all  the organic liquid
loading  outlets for such aggregation or combination of loading equipment
can be encompassed  within any circle of 300 feet in diameter.
     This amendment shall be effective at the date of its adoption for any
equipment  not then completed and put into service.  As to all other equip-
ment this amendment shall be effective on July  1, 1972.

Rule 62. Sulfur Contents of  Fuels.
     A person shall not burn within the Los Angeles Basin  at any time be-
tween May 1  and September 30,  both dates inclusive, during the calendar
year 1959. and each  year thereafter between  April  15 and November 15,
both inclusive, of the same calendar year, any gaseous fuel containing sulfur
compounds in excess of 50 grains per  100 cubic feet of gaseous fuel, calcu-
lated as hydrogen sulfide at standard conditions, or any liquid fuel or solid
fuel  having a sulfur content in excess of 0.5 per cent by weight.
     The provisions of this rule shall nQt apply to:
         a.   The burning of sulfur, hydrogen sulfide, acid sludge or other
     sulfur compounds in the manufacturing of sulfur or sulfur compounds.
         b.   The incinerating of waste gases provided that the gross heat-
     ing value of such gases  is less than 300 British Thermal Units per cubic
     foot at standard conditions and the  fuel used to incinerate such waste
     gases  does not  contain sulfur or sulfur compounds in  excess of the a-
     mount specified in this rule.

-------
         C.   The use of solid fuels in any metallurgical process.
         d.   The use of fuels where the gaseous products of combustion
     are used as raw materials for other processes.
         e.   The use of liquid or solid fuel to propel or test any vehicle,
     aircraft, missile, locomotive, boat or ship.
         f.   The use of liquid fuel whenever the supply of gaseous fuel,
     the  burning of which is permitted by this rule, is not physically avail-
     able to the user due to accident, act of God, act of war, act of  the
     public enemy, or failure of the supplier.

Rule 62.1   Sulfur Contents of Fuels.
     a.   A person  shall not  burn within the Los Angeles Basin at  any
time between the days of November 16  of any year  and April  14 of the
next succeeding calendar year, both dates inclusive, any fuel described in the
first paragraph of Rule 62 of these Rules and Regulations.
     b.   The provisions  of this Rule do not apply to:
         1.   Any use of fuel described in Subsections a,b,c,d,e, and f of
              said Rule  62  under the conditions and for the uses set forth
              in said Subsections.
         2.   The use of liquid fuel during a period for which the supplier
              of gaseous fuel, the burning of which  is not prohibited  by
              this Rule, interrupts the delivery of gaseous fuel to the user.
     C.   Every holder of, and every applicant for a permit to operate fuel-
 burning  equipment under these Rules and Regulations shall notify the  Air
 Pollution Control Officer in the manner and form prescribed by him, of each
 interruption in and resumption of delivery of gaseous fuel to his equipment.

 Rule 62.2   Sulfur Contents of Fuels.
      Notwithstanding the provisions of Section  (f) of Rule 62 or any  pro-

-------
vision of said section as incorporated into Rule 62.1 or any provision of
Subsection (2) of Section b of Rule 62.1, a person shall not burn within the
Los Angeles Basin any liquid fuel or solid fuel having a sulfur content in ex-
cess of 0.5 per cent by weight.
     It shall not be a violation of this rule to burn such fuel for a period of
not to exceed three calendar days (and  in addition for that period of time
necessary for the Hearing Board to render a decision, provided that an ap-
plication for a variance is promptly filed) when other fuel which complies with
this Rule is not used due to accident, strike, sabotage, or  act of God.

Rule 63. Gasoline Specifications.
     a.    A person shall not, after June 30,  1960, sell or supply for use
within the District as a fuel for motor vehicles as defined by the Vehicle
Code of the State of California, gasoline having a degree of unsaturation
greater than that indicated  by a Bromine Number of 30 as determined by
ASTM Method D1159-57T  modified  by omission of the mercuric chloride
catalyst.
     b.    For the  purpose  of this rule, the term "gasoline" means any pe-
troleum distillate having a  Reid vapor pressure of more than four pounds.

Rule 64.  Reduction of Animal Matter.
          »
     A person shall not operate or use any article, machine, equipment or
other contrivance for the reduction of animal matter unless all gases, vapors
and gas-entrained  effluents from  such  an article, machine,  equipment or
other contrivance  are:
          a.   Incinerated  at temperatures of  not less than 1200 degrees
     Fahrenheit  for a period of not  less than 0.3 second, or
          b.   Processed in  such a manner determined by the Air Pollution

-------
     Control Officer to be equally, or more, effective for the purpose of air
     pollution control than (a) above.
     A person incinerating or processing gases, vapors or gas-entrained efflu-
ents pursuant to this rule shall  provide, properly install and maintain in cali-
bration, in good working order and in operation devices, as specified in the
Authority to Construct or Permit to  Operate or as specified by the Air Pol-
lution Control Officer, for indicating temperature, pressure or other operat-
ing conditions.
     For the purpose of this rule, "reduction" is defined as any heated proc-
ess,   including  rendering, cooking, drying, dehydrating, digesting, evaporat-
ing and protein concentrating.
     The provisions of this rule shall not apply to any  article,   machine,
equipment or other contrivance used exclusively for the processing of food
for human consumption.

Rule 65.  Gasoline Loading Into Tanks.
     A person shall not after January 1, 1965, load or permit the loading of
gasoline into any  stationary tank with a capacity of 250 gallons or more
from any tank truck or trailer, except through a permanent submerged fill
pipe, unless such  tank  is equipped with a vapor loss control device as  de-
scribed in Rule 56, or is a pressure tank as described in Rule 56.
     The provisions of the first paragraph of this rule shall not apply to the
loading of gasoline into any tank having a capacity of less than 2,000 gallons
which was installed prior to the  date of adoption of  this rule  nor to any
underground tank installed prior to the date of adoption of this rule where
the fill line between the fill connection and tank is offset.
     Any  person  operating or using any gasoline tank with a  capacity  of
250 gallons or more installed prior to the date of adoption of this  rule shall

-------
apply for a permit to operate such tank before January 1, 1965.  The provi-
sions of Rule 40 shall not apply during the period between the date of adop-
tion of this rule and January 1, 1965, to any gasoline tank installed prior to
the date of adoption of this rule provided an application for permit to oper-
ate is filed before January 1, 1965.
    A person shall not install any gasoline tank with a capacity of 250 gal-
lons or more unless such tank is equipped as described in the first paragraph
of this rule.
     For the purpose of  this rule, the term "gasoline" is defined as any pe-
troleum  distillate  having a Reid vapor  pressure of 4 pounds  or greater.
     For the purpose of  this rule, the term "submerged fill pipe" is defined
as any fill pipe the discharge opening of which is entirely submerged when
the liquid level is  6 inches above the bottom of the tank.  "Submerged fill
pipe" when applied to a tank which is loaded from the side  is defined as any
fill pipe  the discharge opening of which is entirely submerged when the liq-
uid  level is 18 inches above the  bottom of the tank.
     The provisions of this rule do not apply to any stationary tank which is
used primarily for the  fueling of  implements of husbandry, as such vehicles
are defined in Division  16 (Section 36000. et seq.) of the  Vehicle Code.

 Rule 66. Organic Solvents.
     a.   -A person shall not  discharge into the atmosphere more than 15
 pounds of organic  materials in any one day, nor more than 3 pounds in any
 one hour, from any article, machine, equipment or other contrivance, in
 which any organic solvent  or any material containing organic solvent comes
 into contact with  flame or is baked, heat-cured or heat-polymerized, in the
 presence of oxygen, unless said discharge has been reduced by at least 85 per
 cent. Those portions of any series of articles, machines, equipment or other

-------
contrivances designed for processing a continuous web, strip or wire which
emit organic materials and using operations described in this section shall be
collectively subject to compliance with this section.
     b.   A person shall not discharge into  the atmosphere more than 40
pounds of organic materials in any one day,  nor more than 8 pounds in any
one hour, from any article, machine, equipment or other contrivance used
under conditions other than described  in section (a), for employing or ap-
plying, any photochem realty reactive solvent, as defined in section (k), or
material containing such photochemicatly  reactive  solvent, unless said dis-
charge has been reduced by at least 85 per cent. Emissions of organic ma-
terials into the atmosphere resulting from air or heated  drying of products
for the first 12 hours after their  removal  from any article, machine, equip-
ment, or other contrivance described in this section shall be included in de-
termining compliance with  this section.  Emissions resulting  from baking,
heat-curing, or heat-polymerizing  as described in section  (a) shall be exclud-
ed from  determination of compliance with this section.  Those portions of
any series of articles, machines,  equipment or other contrivances designed
for processing a continuous web,  strip or wire which emit organic materials
and using operations described in this section shall be collectively subject to
compliance with this section.
     c.   A person shall not. after August 31, 1974, discharge into the at-
mosphere more than 3,000 pounds of organic materials in any one day, nor
more than 450 pounds in any one hour, from any article, machine, equip-
ment or other contrivance in which any non-photochemically reactive organ-
ic  solvent or any material containing such solvent is employed or applied,
unless said discharge has been reduced by at least 85 per  cent. Emissions of
organic materials into the atmosphere resulting from air or heated drying of
products for the first 12 hours after their removal from any article, machine.

-------
equipment, or other contrivance described in this section shall be included
in determining compliance with this section.  Emissions resulting  from bak-
ing, heat-curing, or heat-polymerizing as described in section (a) shall be ex-
cluded from determination of compliance with this section. Those portions
of any series of articles, machines, equipment or other contrivances designed
for processing a continuous web, strip or wire which emit organic materials
and using operations described in this section shall  be collectively subject
to compliance with this section.
     d    Emissions of organic materials to the atmosphere from  the clean-
up with  photochemically reactive solvent, as defined in section (k), of any
article, machine, equipment or other  contrivance described in sections  (a),
(b) or (c}, shall be included with the other emissions of organic materials
from that article, machine, equipment or other contrivance for determining
compliance with this rule.
     f.    Emissions of organic materials into the atmosphere  required to be
controlled by sections (a), (b) or (c), shall be reduced  by:
          1.   Incineration,  provided  that 90 per cent or more of the car-
              bon in the organic material being incinerated  is oxidized to
              carbon dioxide, or
          2.    Adsorption, or
          3.    Processing in a  manner determined by the Air  Pollution Con-
              trol Officer to  be not less effective  than (1) or  (2)  above.
     g.    A person incinerating, adsorbing, or otherwise processing organic
materials pursuant to this rule shall provide, properly install and maintain in
calibration, in  good working order and in operation, devices  as specified in
the authority to construct or  the permit to operate, or as specified by the
Air Pollution Control Officer, for indicating temperatures, pressures, rates
of flow or other operating conditions necessary to determine  the degree and

-------
effectiveness of air pollution control.
     h.   Any person using organic solvents or any materials containing or-
ganic solvents shall supply the Air Pollution Control Officer, upon request
and  in  the  manner  and form  prescribed by him, written evidence of the
chemical composition, physical properties and amount consumed for each
organic  solvent used.
     i.   The provisions of this rule shall not apply to:
          1.   The manufacture of organic solvents, or the transport or
              storage of organic solvents or  materials  containing organic
              solvents.
          2.   The use  of equipment for which other requirements are
              specified  by Rules  56,  59, 61  or 65 or which  are exempt
              from air pollution control requirements  by  said rules.
          3.   The spraying or other employment of insecticides, pesticides
              or herbicides.
          4.   The employment, application, evaporation or drying of satu-
              rated halogenated hydrocarbons or perchloroethylene.
          5.   The use of  any  material, in any article, machine, equipment
              or other contrivance described in  sections (a), (b), (c) or (d),
              if:
          (i)       the volatile content of such material consists only of
                   water and  organic  solvents,  and
          (ii)       the organic solvents  comprise not  more than  20 per
                   cent of said volatile content, and
          (iii)      the volatile content is not photochemicaliy reactive as
                   defined in  section (k).
     j.    For the purposes of this rule, organic solvents include diluents and
thinners and are defined as organic materials which  are liquids at standard

-------
conditions and which are used as dissolvers, viscosity reducers or cleaning
agents, except that such materials which exhibit a boiling point luyhcr Hum
220°F at 0.5 millimeter  mercury absolute pressure or having an equivalent
vapor pressure shall not be considered to be solvents unless exposed to tuin
peratures exceeding 220° F.
     k.   For the purposes of this rule, a photochemically reactive solvent is
any solvent with an aggregate of more than 20 per cent  of its total volume
composed of the chemical compounds classified below or which exceeds any
of the following individual percentage composition limitations, referred to
the total volume of solvent:
         1.   A combination of hydrocarbons, alcohols, aldehydes, esters,
              ethers or ketones having an olefinic or cyclo-olefinic type of
              unsaturation: 5 per cent;
         2.   A combination of aromatic compounds with eight or more
              carbon  atoms to the molecule except ethylbenzene:  8 per
              cent;
         3.   A  combination of ethylbenzene,  ketones having branched
              hydrocarbon structures, trichloroethylene or toluene: 20 per
              cent.
     Whenever any organic solvent or any constituent of an organic solvent
may be classified  from its chemical structure into more than one of   the
above   groups  of organic  compounds, it shall be considered as a member
of the most'reactive chemical group, that is, that group having the least
allowable per cent of  the total  volume of solvents.
     I.   For the purposes of  this  rule, organic materials are defined  as
chemical compounds of carbon excluding carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide,
carbonic acid, metallic carbides,  metallic carbonates and  ammonium carbon-
ate.

-------
 Rule 66.1. Architectural Coatings.
     a.   A  person shall not sell or offer for sale for use in Los Angeles
 County, in containers  of  one quart capacity or larger, any architectural
 coating containing  photochemically reactive solvent,  as  defined in  Rule
 66(k).
     b.   A person shall not employ, apply, evaporate or dry in Los Angeles
 County any architectural  coating,  purchased in containers of  one quart
 capacity or larger,  containing photochemically reactive solvent,  as defined
 in Rule 66 (k).
     c.   A person shall not thin or dilute any architectural coating with a
 photochemically reactive solvent, as defined in Rule 66(k).
     d.   For the purposes of this rule, an architectural coating is defined as
 a coating used  for  residential or commercial buildings and their appurte-
 nances; or industrial buiJdings.

 Rule 66.2 .Disposal and Evaporation of Solvents
     A person shall not during any one day dispose of a total of more than
 114 gallons of any photochemically reactive solvent, as defined in Rule 66(k),
or of any  material containing more than VA gallons of any such photochemi-
cally reactive solvent by any means which will  permit the evaporation of
such solvent  into the atmosphere.

 Rule 67.  Fuel Burning Equipment.
     A person shall  not build, erect, install or expand any non-mobile fuel
burning equipment  unit unless the discharge into the atmosphere  of contam-
 inants   will not and does not  exceed any one  or  more of the following
rates:
     1.   200 pounds per  hour of sulfur compounds, calculated  as sulfur

-------
          dioxide (S02);
     2.   140 pounds per hour of nitrogen oxides, calculated as nitrogen
          dioxide (N02);
     3.   10 pounds per hour of combustion contaminants as defined  in
          Rule 2m and derived  from the fuel.
     For  the purpose of this rule, a fuel burning  equipment unit shall  be
 comprised of the minimum number of boilers, furnaces, jet engines or other
 fuel burning equipment, the  simultaneous operations of which are required
 for the production of useful  heat or power.
     Fuel burning equipment serving primarily as  air pollution control
 equipment by  using a  combustion  process to destroy  air contaminants
 shall  be  exempt from  the provisions of this rule.
     Nothing in this rule shall be construed as preventing the maintenance
 or preventing the alteration  or modification of an existing  fuel  burning
 equipment unit which will reduce  its mass rate of air contaminant emissions.

 Rule 68.  Fuel Burning Equipment - Oxides of Nitrogen.
     A person  shall  not discharge  into the atmosphere  from any  non-
mobile fuel burning article, machine, equipment or other contrivance, having
a maximum heat input  rate of more than  1775 million British  Thermal
Units (BTU) per hour (gross), flue gas having a concentration of  nitrogen
oxides, calculated as  nitrogen dioxide (N02)  at 3 per cent oxygen, in ex-
cess of that shown in the following table:
 NITROGEN OXIDES -  PARTS PER MILLION PARTS OF FLUE GAS
FUEL
Gas
Liquid or Solid
EFFECTIVE DATE
DECEMBER 31. 1971
225
325
DECEMBER 31.1974
125
225

-------
Rule 68.1. Fuel Burning Equipment - Combustion Contaminants.
     A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere combustion contami-
nants exceeding in concentration at the point of discharge, 0.3 grain per
cubic foot of gas calculated to  12  per cent of carbon dioxide (C02)  at
standard conditions.

  Rule 69.  Vacuum Producing  Devices or Systems.
      A person shall not discharge into the atmosphere more than 3 pounds
  of organic materials in any one hour from any vacuum producing devices or
  systems including hot wells and accumulators, unless said discharge has been
  reduced by at least 90 per cent.
      This  rule shall  be effective at  the date of its adoption for any equip-
  ment  not  then completed and  put into service.  As to all other equipment
  this rule shall  be effective on July  1, 1972.

  Rule 70.  Asphalt Air Blowing.
      A person shall not operate or use any article, machine, equipment or
  other  contrivance for the air blowing of asphalt unless all gases, vapors and
  gas-entrained effluents from such an article, machine, equipment or other
  contrivance are:
            a.   Incinerated at temperatures of  not less  than  1400 degrees
      Fahrenheit for  a period of not less  than  0.3  second, or
            b.   Processed in such a manner determined by the Air Pollution
       Control Officer to be equally,  or more, effective for the purpose of air
       pollution control than (a) above.
       This' rule shall  be  effective at the date of its adoption for any equip-
  ment not then completed and put into service.  As to all other equipment
  this rule shall be effective on July 1. 1972.

   Rule  71.  Carbon Monoxide.
       A person shall  not, after December 31, 1971, discharge into the atmos-
  phere carbon monoxide (CO)  in  concentrations exceeding 0.2 per cent by
  volume measured on a dry basis.
       The  provisions of this rule shall  not apply to emissions from internal

-------
combustion engines.

Rule 72. Pumps and Compressors.
     A person shall not. after July 1.  1973. use any pump or compressor
handling organic materials having a Reid Vapor Pressure of 1.5  pounds or
greater unless such pump or compressor is equipped with a mechanical seal
or other device of equal or greater efficiency approved by the Air Pollution
Control Officer.
     The provisions of this rule shall not apply to any pump or compressor
which  has  a driver of  less  than one (1) horsepower motor or  equivalent
rated energy or to any pump or compressor  operating at temperatures  m
excess of 500°F.

Rule 73. Safety Pressure Relief Valves.
     A person  shall   not,  after July  1.  1973, use  any safety pressure
relief valve on any equipment handling organic materials above 15 pounds
per  square inch absolute pressure unless the  safety pressure relief valve  is
vented to a vapor recovery or disposal system, protected by a rupture disc.
or is maintained by  an inspection  system approved by  the  Air  Pollution
Control Officer.
     The provisions of this rule shall not apply to any safety pressure relief
valve of one (1) inch pipe size or less.

-------
             APPENDIX  C




PROCESS HEATER AND BOILER INFORMATION

-------
IDENT
NO.
F-l
f-i
r-i
F-l
f-IA,t C.
F-T
F-z.
r-z.:
t-13*£
F- lo
f-3.0
Rta 31
fin 31
Bie. 33
(S•»-

F-/o7
-r /os
F- /to
F. /3p
F- *o|
f. 2o/
F-ioj-
F- t»t

f- Jo4-
*".2o5
F- 2'tf*
F-2o6
F-2«7
F-Zol
r t.fi
F-Sol

f-tet_&
f-3o/ /)
r 3 , o

«"-3»x.
F-3«x
F-3oz

f-S*>S
F-3.7

F^Jio
/-
Po>
Poy. DIK.
5/?Ul»
'Ri>-
jr
2CU
1^0
SMS
JMU
TMff
DPd
WHO
SltU Jo
5f t> 3o
51 1/ Jo



ZC«l>
zc/?u
£C(?L/
2CP.il
<*£,•> p-.-r
RATING
RATED MBTU7HR ^
HEAT INPUT *
53?
58?
57?
52 ?
/If

375-
'if
/3I6.
61<
la
Z4-
j-0
jfo
/o J
/77
/77
/77

^fSt
^
^•1. •"
Z.6
65^
iSS-'
Si?
/

49 ?
45"
,
Jo
zs

/6
y/-5
55s-
2&
53?
1

1
9ov-
3o
•7
7o?
2S

,s
2»5
Zo<
\ .'Too


Jo
I.
f
t
2o
3.S

89

gt<
v;
if


5
UJ
K.
U.
O
u
X





















































!•-












FUEL
UJ
o_
6*
r/
s*
C
^J
a*-
q
(7
(^
(7
^
s*
ff*


,J

V

jj

,;
,
/


j
y
/
/
y
,
^



-J


^
V
y
,•


EFO aets/wo
BURNING RATE
/I £U
7 *»
II 71i
7*«
/J «?:.
r"jl!;«
rr'..T«
««»
•i(,i. . «


//
.5B«7







//«"«
3}ll

JU&$2>-
110 >a 'tL*
t.,.lti.«

••'• —
*v.»ii
r.'li '^«


.5-459


r/l'o "
6/rj»

scrs

C.ZC.L

/.'':il

".cl .r
V^j'"
f"*!.?'"


JI3-S-
'r£i'\~
il7Ji
fjo«"
F^ji/«
Jtl-t
Z-I«4.
	


f.'^.'"


4)5
To
^
7
5-7
r»
T"

I
V".
7'-

3?
4

7-n
r.


s?

V-


i -t ^

HOT ABOVE CSAOEfFT)
/So
So
So
?i*
6\
/E«
,tj
lio
$?•
"*»'*,
t4o
I**



/go



/5o
65-
^#?o
/es
/2S
PJ1-
f^O
(IS
/If
Sf
PPr>
fJff,

Pfr


Jt
Wo
/oo
P(?n
P-I
STACK
TEMP OF EFFLUENT
6J-o
?6»
Sf.
V.a.
^W
43.
s;»
^tfo
•££<£
«.si
6.0




JJf



Poo
es^o
-f i3
SSt.
gco
6S»
CSJJ

7"
goo
c*s»
-C54
/Coo
-831
SAT

«r.
CiSS
49«
CFSS
' S fsj.)
Pff, \CS3S
/OO
/v?o
,3?
I/O
(So

PJ?.
/7o

/op*


if
<•?'
'',70
P^
/Tr,
£32.
1 00

/50

7?r
C6.51
-•Tco
4;o
/<.£».
«.
*/. A.

4,
>V. J.
««<.


fl.A.

V.4

^..

vx.

IDENTNO.
e
^
R
?
25
6
a
4-
?f


Jo
.r



j-



Zfl
2«.



v /i.

-

rJn.


*.f.

ai.





34-

/•«-
J4-
,,


t

JS-


i4.
'7



7o

J51
Jl

31



REMARKS





3 j/^is


.
-»»Auil
y/,,/^ 4,> IJ^ . /
/ X















Ji/^«3
1. J TACif^





J-r-.,/.-, .„/.



7,#wtt

_T-7o 6 Ir4c« J««vf r r^Ltlj ,"

2 X/«^lj








\ Zfr«.«)j^









(1C *»




r.^.., -..:<•, *• -ft.

-------
,^c^. n«.f.,sO FUEL
NO.
r-soiA
f-5»(B
r-Soi c
F-5-«
f-5Jo
F-5JO
F.54o
F-S4.Q
f.faoo

f-f.ro
f-TOI
7-702.
f-7<>S
f-72o
F-TJI
F•^i"o
f-T90
f. /BOO
F-/oto

F-yott-
f'/olj,
f'/o3o
f'lloOA
T' II oo-g,
r- 1160
f. mo

F- it 10
F- <32o
f' '31 o4


f- Kio
F-/
F./rro

F-/6/0
F^SjT
r-455i.



M
m
i
n
m
RATED MBTU/HR *
HEAT INPUT \
-«...««.


j. M.
Tt.-M'r
l\oWkt
rif«4)i
J,-.» PiT
M-o UrK

TJ.-,A»
iff w
fXll
stu
TSVMAM
Ti.«»«
•-ll
fCflf
/Cfl/
•CfU
ICfflJ
4cti
«CJ

/60
/7«.
,Jo

«-
/Jo 3
'5- J
3J9
.-•*
2e
10
IS

^
,4 ;
31


s
IU
i
UL
0
1
X












































e
0.
p*
;*
C*
1.1
6
r,
<•

&
6
^



p*
(51


,;


ff
(T
g
^*
fi*

fi*
,.,,»
><;-r
r,r



6
rt

G
C,'
•J-
C
rt
f.

HEATING VALUE
Hot

s
s
t
t
,


net,
s



//-&
^


noG
s
J
,
*
,
-

	






W06
,




JlOf.
r



it
/»
,
/
,
.
/
^


c?'
,



..*•



,/«
/
^
/
/
.
„








,.•''*
.




T1
f



ASH «(WT)
J
,
f
,
.

,


,i
.



J
,


,1
,
/
,
,
t









i
s




7"
/



£FO aSLS/MO
BURNING RATE
-Sl^lT
• IMS
' 5*14
2)4.0
»$<«>
JMrf
lg»1
fit

^e/£
34-31



Jlr-ii"



_U»l.
"'Jr.'."
,-ti ^
'f'tveo 1
'i".'c,~
't",'.1









/DCS
r it.'."




Iff
«_*_«

o

STACK
DIAATTIP(FT)
•V1
.b!
n1-
'«*

s?

?:>
,«


r.
t-
r
,•>.'•
/o -
r-
„»
•f-
f<
o';«
4*
'•«*
4?
tl>
ft'

,*
.-
r
I1-

t
3f
3s-
,«
1'
jT
71


in
TEMP OF EFFLUENT
•Too
.-TOO

«•({£

cei



^OJ
Sf>
rsts
CHS

Jei,
S-.o


7KO
^30
55-0
7»»
eis
t>s>
4.,'
4ic'
f
4-p

SSr
Vf°

.*«'

7J.

.t. ! 	
.i«
•n
nt
».
/no
^7*
/oo



44.'
6-la
•P3J"



1 EXIT VELOCITY
OF EFFLUEST
JJ


Jt

.. ,1



^ 4
Ji



V-
»? «•


rf/l
J1
.)•
„,,
-«
rf^
V
JJ
V--






^
VJI




^4
,j
^4.


0
f-
j:
Ul
Q
M
n
n
.)•,

i-,

Jr
,,
Jn
Jfi



JJ
jj

t1
/*•
,s
,s
ff
,f
,3
te
„
la
,,
F7
/t
y?
/t

/«
/«
n
II
/f
^
«
31
Z(i?
4

REMARKS
IF-n
iV^j
i /^.ti .
1/A./J




Irt^rafo^Lf
Jc


l/C
U(.».
4»e«»


Jf*"
UC"
*•! r-roi
»•* *•'••>•

ual r./.f
uu f i*f
w.i C./oC
je' *
1-C-"

UC"
•Jc
u c *^
uc"
oc"*
JC<*


r;e *•
JC-P
,,<-

Lit''

^tf»/VJrtD"?Blj:DA
r»c.t

               m lioirtf *»£i *«Y Ot O*««I6« * r
               • //«/< iW«  /^ <•> t -6. J f '»' tro/att
                        A. f.
                           t
                           ,'%^ '>»••'«
                           "*« C. -'»r«"C"«
C- ftr i

-------
           APPENDIX D




INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES DATA

-------
                                                       (I)
STATIONARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
          EL SEGUNDO REFINERY
Engine
Designation
K-l
K-2
K-3
K-4
K-202
K-203
K-204
K-1001
K-1002
K-1003
K-1035
Engine
Type
2 cycle
2 cycle
2 cycle
2 cycle
4 cycle
4 cycle
4 cycle
2 cycle
2 cycle
2 cycle
2 cycle
Fuel Use
MCFD
122
122
122

82
82
82
96
96
96
48
Fuel
Type
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.
N.G.

-------
      APPENDIX  E




STORAGE TANK LISTING

-------
TArlX
DATA
IDENT
f\
0?

64.
OS
06
** "7
06
05
/o
j !
/2
13

• /S

f 7
/ 6
/.O

?/
»> 9JL
*v 23
mv Z-J
*V ?3
ZG
?7
?*
on
3o
4 /
32
3?
S £
55

37
3R

•Co
•#/
yj 2
^ <
<;*
^^
•/o
**• 7
u
0.

F







,

r

Ul













c \



r


.
















F









•f .•*•! c
i/o!
























CAPACITY ^
S. 0. H. ^
(OBLS)

35-^0










— r _
u.
6

?/i









36TS"' 3o

J57a



o --..-













5s



~O












i










i
3'^ a
p
u.
H
O

•^









10

,<,:



AVG OUTAGC(rT)

















30 1








1


























1
,0 ^i| 	
! i




i
















1


1








SHELL
u
0.
V

0









tf

„



0



















i»






i !




i •
j M-~'fir> ' '9!' 	 :P

-y,! 1

j

•
PAINT FACTO.1? (FR)













>it



POOF
e
u.
0
u
c.
t-

p











ff.



1



















/•?






















^>,l



i






I L->
i






u

T



































T









1



PRODUCT
TYPEORMAMH
(J)

flrwrjj Ci^o









«/$

o***Lif»o

















	 	 	 I- -.





-------
j TVIK
DA.VA.
/')
IOEHT
.C/
^3)
IU
c.
>•

.*••'
5"^i F
JT4i e
Jjl C
J5
5"7
S*.


(X
KJ
c.
•i
7t
1 	







ft- \
Go.
51
0 2
«3
«•
65
ori^
c


I





1— -;— i
67i
5?


£•)!
7o
71
72
73
_7 ;.
1*
75
77
7*
7°
ft"
1
1





1

1
CAPACITY ^
S. 0. H. 7
{DDLS}


So+S"
j?gga"






2o 'o


Dl:«j
P
a.
<
O


40
AO
'o




P
u.
u
jC


'0-
^
?<»7-




1
S-l



















!


p'u-

i^9o




i
i*)~












1










•,s t
?
»-


f?
P
•ft




























R


















PAIHT FACTOR (FrO


77
n



















PO'.r
r«>
c>
u;
u.
O
UJ
c.
>
t-


tpt
•/PJ



















l



i


H'f—
;*i\Ptn?' - aRa y+^'ia ! i *f
c??.

.•; -s
5 c
K r
i i 1 !
i
c '• i->^>
. P-J^.e'. 2o£3
P ;HC' ?aSO
t
c •••
K1
So
9;


1



•
i
i
	 nj.»
	 a_3 	
'G.:l
	 LS
?••
I 	 £1
I .-?!•>
i
I
1 •••
1
---
i 	
111 I IO
,^i fc;
J±fi=l





'w
^ !l*'



i


1

~r
	 ! 	
i
1 ; !

r M.













^.o
t-


/*
«J














































AVG THROUGHPUT ^
(CDL'V.O) 7


/ooe
H3,

























»IA




tJlA
J/A













* 8| /co*
R£:^?,
-------
T*tN.<
IMfA
IDHNT
/O/
/0£
/o3
**" ci
/Ojf
/OS
L"
/ZS

/ VS
,1,1

U)
u
o.
t-
C
F
r-

£=
(3
P
f
cr
f:
u
,/




^
-



1
e
c


c

cvfc
f
r-
,cr

/r

~


f

H
5 SI
i* *<
rs»-.
.-?!-.

^;-r*»
Z2&S
^ S f J if
St^'J
ft 5 7-a
«-,2 -

D!\f
P
3
13
3rT
3s;

3#j
Ja
3o
4o
P
u.
O
^1
.if
;«^
AVCOUTACC._•>
/.: o
/•= /
; •>
•-: ?.
•i^r
:£&.

r.
f



__1



_£J

F
/"• f
3540
r^-if
: t vJo

y.-i-js

14- 'O


/J-TdO
'
/^rt<-«

/?.j/f
40

4/j

4n
«-.

i?0

63


fio

63

So
,0

J?
3fl-
?0-
-r-

H',

.-0;


**-

V>*











Sh=LlJ ROOP
UJ
a.
•K'
P
S
u.
«
O
\
t-
z
5
C-

il
L

,v'
U
.y
a
,e>
£?

\.r
#
£>

,-
J
^










!
Q

6




r,


Ct0


_

'.7



ci
JL
O
U
0.
f-
-
OC
DO

50


.01
.-)»
•//=,



i





/?

f*>




OBc.

t \

,,?! ^
32 "t S
_^T3io^So 39-


/44ffo
/3T7->
/ 17ni


Oo





Sj. 1^-


i"
/^•js» l^o LJI"!

_'- ! /.'MO


_L_L
1
£i.
>..
/,J!.,i.


/-.^^t

/-'-=j|
f







/=»

p

/rt


p

5>L

C3
1
i

/?

.->

r.
f>O ji-l ,"
0 J I
1
i
i
fiol
^i-f
I
,*^t.^ So h,, ',
.__ 	 . .. i
,r 1
. -


!

=
"'(
-i

f»jt.

.r6-r

C"/lo JTJO

4«c*f
CA v > r / c
<&/-•!


B-T f^ec/j

R te On,


p£^. fjry.

K ec o//

/«>rr ^ ./
	 1 , /rv ....> 1



1
J ^ 9












O/S
- ! .rr r


^3 I -


//-,
1


BLtol I"1
r.9v

Bli-

.-
P
•_-7i

.

r
..
T
ex
A> i -
_'_•'•:_<" |_ 1 ^TTfiTabs- Iw! — 'Pa. ••

/ac.j;i
«;=!
-j«:

;•/ 1-
-\
/'.. 1-
0/5

o/s
CU7 rf ^
— *?3T*)»l fiHJ* ^of
5"*r t'f.iusrt*} ,

^. vf.A.f '
/)vG-/ij 5
/Jv&A5
Xl/.itviot |
_&••? On
T£T _
(S^
t;
(••
Z
10
$
irA
«>
X.
1
^
Z
—
,/

—
A?
o.r
c
IU
• V
o
.J

c
°v



*-







J

o

—
B3

^•v—
—

1




rr
,|
-t-&
it.
o
B.
IU
111
O
O

7°
7o

Js.


	
7"








7"

JZ2.

7o



,.







11A
b
a"

/r.
/-jr

0 «



tl
At







LE.
^*


--
6,°




i

t-
P-
G
Is
U

/•.ui.

/CO
ffjA
Af/ft
^
Iv/i





V/4i


?oo

Jor>0




>r*.o





|
1



..>ASXS „.?
'.'LJ '

6.' —

is'

, j
o*
->•{
T

"J


,-.
'I ,'

-;,_
TJ>

a-

" •




s'f 	

7o

5 i

'
1
— . . .,— -. \ *i j
	 -f- .-

" 1 I"
-M 	

•7*>!


J*\

I

>^*~-
?5
*•

—
~
M
_J
_T
—
Si
7.0.1
1°.
— 1

I.-*.
<< i
'.8
I
r

- \
	 /J>««

3 7 OP.

-,
'
7^


i
	 1 y ,
-_—!-* '

-------
       OA f A
IOENT
H.
S)
AP
.O.
                       DIMS
                                    KOOr
                                        0
                                                     PRODUCT
                                           TVfS 03 NAME
                                                       75";
                                                              Sm-n7
AVC THROUGHPUT
(DDL -MO)
                                                                                REMA3XS
  .5V
                   2o
                                     DO I r
  XI C i
                    ?0
                         ?
      C f
                                              0/S
rs* P t
                                — \\IHt
                                               o/J
                                                                          7J
     P!^
                             J.W
                                                                   A///5
                                                                  iJ/A
   S/
 /ff »
                               rf 	1 35
                                                             Tc
                                                                  fJ/t.
   vri
  _oil
                   f3  2^-i
                                '1
                                                        /.I
                                                          p.l
                                                             If
                                    CD
                                             0/S
      »- 1
                                              o/s
                                                                          75T
 ••7= = >
   TJI   I
                      -P--
                                            DlESCL
                                                        A/
                          I   I
   »*T

   $
        -H
                    d^f
."'7?L
   55
                                             e/s
"«'g^
                                                             7°
                                                                $.0
   70!
 if. -- c
                      .[^L
                      LLTi-L
                              I-1'
                                           flo GAS
                                                GAS
                                                                   3447SO
                                                              4.R
                                                               7.1
                                                                   3J3 o.o
           I
  /a^l.-- i   I
  -vf^i   r
                    L±i.i:
                                                £ii_
                              H-
                   I	i

                                1 1 1 '. 0
                                                        itUi
                                                      _L_

_'JJfpLJ._r_^.-JL.-iL-.3.ll£j	s
._.'JlS_a. 1	i   ??•>? ~\ .'j [~i_!	j?j:
_ .-^L£.._
  5 "' f~

                                    C"/L'
                                               e^t.
                                             JP-4-
                                           GAS an
                                                        B
                                                            JH.
                                                                   6t,o^
                                                      iB-fl..
                                                      ^
                                                                         7/

                                                                          2J	

-------
                   TANK
                                                    PRODUCT
                                                                              REHARXS yoj-
       DATA
IDENT
     f«-5 i
i
H.
LS)
CA
$.
0.
O
                             SHELL
                                   ROOF
                                          TYPE03HAME
                                  TsHTT
                                                            .DATA
~
"
AVG THROUGHP
(03L/MO)
   o/
                       /•r
 -2£2
                                            °JJL.
 Z64.
  -2£
                                                      4s
  _2£
 _2oj_
                   .'4
 20 Si
                              f?
                                             Thtnntr-
 2/o
                                            A39HALT

£1*
             /63o
                                                B" "i-
                                   Afi
 ^£5
                             ££
                                   4a
              /^>io go i jt
 2/S
                                                      ^
  /a
 g?/
                                                _act.
                                                O'A
              Tl80
                   ^ia !.-:
                    So
                                           _Aj£iMiT_
                   4o
                             RT
                             r>TL
                                                                        dbi.
  ^ja
                      lao1-
                             =?-
                             f?
                                          GAi <
 ?3 /
      P
,Z32
                      istL
                                   As
  _li
 837
                   2O
 238
i".i
                              vr
                                            XtaPn EMI/L.
                       29?
                            T:
_Liz
              /-3£!
                       29^
                       "
^2*7
2.--
/r
j:<9 c
       L_!  ;   "'169
       •rrr:;«
                             41
                                            Xli^j f^tit
                              vr
                                                      /la
                             vr
                                            AlPUtLT
                                              0/s
                                            /Is fa E~«IL
    29?!   T^
                                              0/S
                                                                     rnJ^	

-------
TAIJK
j DATA
1DEHT
"2S 1

?5"1
2«
ZSS
ZJ-4
•»«•-.
,,T,,
?Ta
Se
S/
at

Ul
Q.
V-
C

r
r
r
r
c

F




264 c
255! c
C'l
u
n.















255! c !
2571 r

G3
» 'o
? J
272






CAPACITY ^
S. 0. H. i
JI13LS)
/•Ci"'-.

/Ajns.
/•L-'9?
/i~J*0
/"3|0
/'JTo
;

79-

fi» -
4*
4fl
3S
1
Q ' "' 35




/_,--
,, ^0
-i40
A?s-




c t

-7.J /•


t??! _C !

77
27*
70

|_
^AUj

'•5 >
-•?J
/"70




?o
2=
IS
5o7-
,,
i|
is"
•W-




?9-
O'rt *
AVC OUTAGC(FT)















•4*-i

•

n"1

/*•
1/5.
"3

.:
jffr,2J7
JO '4»



* r
Ul
c.
V
p

V'J
0
jj*
PAIt4T FACTOR (FR)





Pi-
fr
0
W





39
'•9




^,-| 	 1

,3
,-


\\i

IvT
IV

.-.-












i
•r

a

_?-_.-7o
_ii2_^_
1 /^i7a
1 . . 1 _ ! 	
"eO
!-•*
! — *
£"
.Cn
1 ... lyll-
i



i
E
i
• i , , -
l
r~
•vl-


.
^
~
F? -
--
"






r- r"
••/
LvL
k
..;
"~

| PRODI
r.OOr
TsT
a
u.
0
u
a.







r'-3-'
if ?&




i/-'j





D D


UJ







i*1^4
,->'o




*,>!





r


I








_





i

-,3



V


1
Pi

f>



! ,

±rr
^

x





• 3t -
'"^"•J"
^R^
i./T
1
1 •*
[.-
i_^_
TrfSOPSAHS

CW«< t?/t

JTer

2),fJ^

/>-.».*«» J\>i.

ru,^^in.




£VBI.<>1<.
i*tl.0,<.
Air* r>4./i.
As* fnui.


fifo^^ct t9/t.

/tjpri fe*n/t
>i r./i
PLKSL O it.



C
ffs
oS
;<-


-"

£-~
•Z r
«-,
-o




C;-,
6S
5^7
5"J



71
oo
"-i
V.,

'
"/ *
!j7





AJ.
• .

-• ,
^_
r— i 	 IT.

-------
TANS
DATA
IBEST
Jo/
0?
03
64.
o-T
Of,

oS
OS
3 t O
f f
I 7
13

. ^
t S
t 7

/ 1
o.
»-
p








r










2JL
g g
~aift
"

1^7
323
3o
3 /
^ *
7 ^
.^
,,.

3 7

i 3
S '- 3
-•it
f ..
•\ •;

., n




<•«?
C







Jl
u
«.
1



,

























1



J

C
C.


i 	
1
f~

<•"/'
! 	 .£.,
i 3'' "
1
•
i






CAPACITY
S.O.H. 't
(COLS)
.,-.-! -^








/•j •".;•












	 lli£-


_^Z<









'/»-.-
• -i


i



^
1
D:/
P
u.
o






1


23












tf


17-
36






I


2-,
P
u.
o
J-.








AVC OUTACC(FT)









•53'












M-


Zd-




























i


So3
.-° :°"







	
1
!




—
U- I"


Sh£LL
u
r-
u.
5
t-
u.
c.
•« lota










n'














P
JJL









*•





i
































—





r~b't~


RCCF
c-
u.'
u.
o
u
c.
p











































\
])
UJ
-

























P3 0 DUCT
fiVEORNAME

^.s-un.





















A/, J04

Spin T Aci P

1


























o/s
j__^S^ 	






A/i.504


IX
c:
3








0'












^

AS_
fJ










Ad

0-
0
-





































1




a^





A)£
AVC STORAGE TEMP °H
7°


































1





1


\ \
A
•J •
o
o.
0."
/*f


































1
r~









AVG THROJCHPUT _
(BDL'MO) C
J7.B









































KEMAR.iS yoy

7i





.


a-

.




.


/















I — ' 	 . 	
- — 	





1

i
•


-------
3 Ti;:.< ^
D.X : \
IDcNT
<•/
-•T.?
U
C.
1-


.f il
.5"£l
S &
_
a"?
_-)3



n.








5-=»l

351
SZ

^

 j • c
z?;





•>•'*
.•-.' Z









AVC OUTAOC(FT)










>l L| FiOOr
IU
c.
t-


PAINT FACTOR (FR>









1



j .,






i


2o i /o'M


"T! i I 1
•>.:,
'"I

— rHf
—





— i
1






/0:














1


!


-
1.
1



1 i



5' -. c ' ! »;rj 35






'«5[


I—


!







TYPCOFF.R. ?










-.-







itt










^







i





i





PRODUCT
Tr?s os SAME











H/*1o








C»UST7c
C< rrt

i



- -


f~ j_


j ..-!-! ! l i
* *> \ • I
.1


.* ,i . ;
f.t! • !
- /.-' : t
«••? i


! ill


I •
i 1
! i 1

i
<• -'• ! ! •
•*•'• '• !
3." ! ? '



5-= •:


.'.-.l- > ,'
*•[
'•s!
	 ^!
k ^*_ j
— L
i
i
• -i J



i
i
f

L I "


i |



—\
'[
i ;

|
i
	 1
— ;
i < i
	 I
i
i
t
_. ..
1


	






i



1
l
l
1
!


















1
|

•
..1


t


i












-








-






0/4
	 L2 	








o/s










ro.
a
c;










d








fln
Afi





























IU
o.
O

l




























-,










AVG STORAGE TcHP °F









































J







|






-
A.
o
M
U.
c."
1-



















































AVC THROUGHPUT 7
(OaU'VO) ~


















































fit'-ASXS /=» 81
'*1











--








5-3
•.i








~t-j









f^





'





-------
TAN,<
DATA
0>
IOEHT
Ot
0?
03
fli
Of
Of,
oj
og
05
/o

/2

/4-
I-S
/6
/7

/ fl
?o
2y
2'
£3
7JL
ZJT

?7
2 "
£9
UJ
CU
I-














UJ
1
I/I

.












1
1






1














1


1
3r>!

'. •>
33
34

^u-
3 7
30
0
3 3

41

4*
4 4.
•£T
•If,
47

<=>
4^-c

















P

F







•













CAPACITY
$. 0. H. '£
(DDLS)














Dl((
DIA (FT)































P
u.
I-
o
X
















i




1










i
































5 "•> o 1 // ">
L
—•:.\inf
















^VG OUTAGE(FT)



























SHELL
UJ
CL



























1










:


i
— 1—
I
i





i
,-n !

^
1




















t-
',
'AINT FACTOR (FR)


































ROOF
(6)
nl
u.
O
u
IX


































1













„,„















p

IT,
Ul













































—

r

-
PRODUCT
TYPE 03 MAM=









































.






6^5o

0/3

|















































J*


DATA
UJ
CL
O















































I


AVG STORAGE TEMP °F















































7-


o
OL*
1-















































'3


AVG THROUGHPUT ^
(aDL/VO) "


































REMAKK* /».a
'/£)





_











.
















1
























»«»«,! 7J

J 	 1"

-------
-_4Oil_c:;
           L^tt'^if^L.JjfljtfsL:-!
_£.-L±
           i_n:^*?.U£!!	liiS: je U_IT.
j	i   -- -7.i/^ji!:	uv.^,..!	Li
	I	-t hT_7g /PlSH^aM.  l-V'h  I .._ I  ~
™r  i   -~     ™~ i^|^   » IP i   i.... j
           .|_jL:?riiIS2Lfil|. -L^jt**' .?_ \.~.
           \	;zs&,cM/foi*]% _ 1 * i»Ai:--'Q ! -k
           ".   ~"JT77n.Tr 'i7/IT."P --r—|
                               ; I -1 rr'j 3—~, ^ o ^—
                                                          oil
                                                             7°
                                                            7°
                                                               t *
                                                               i.t-
                                                            Ziti
                                                          -S£S,7S°-
                                                               /3| ,T»«.g?.

-------

-------
7A'! <
DA, *
IOEHT
UJ ^
ft- ^S
y-.i c
-r.-r-J c.
CAPACITY .7
S. 0. H. ^
(atits)
, . ..


J-T-^ --
^-J.^ -
si-s! •-
5"Jfi C
. -
-
v ' •
,-., .
T'l *;
P
u.
5
2-,
Z-,
;,,
,a
P
u.
o
2s-
S»*
-*--
-,
2o 2o

AVG OUTAGE(FT)

Sf
u
c.
1-
>
i
1 - '



~a\
?.o to
jy, J c J '-,•>) .30 i ?D
-r-f» - i
,5"Td< C

'- • i £o ' '•-•3

.: »-, >
rfVcf c* J '*-*
""*t
i
•S"V75 C i
•5~> -ji c 1

^p-^; c i
.- - -.', - •
.•7-v..! C. i
J/7 .' C

i'7V. -C i
i _ i
3"7 £ f, :

*• ^ - -

/• - •'
Jiff*
."•f

/.-/•r

f : ft.:
2o '0
-to
lo
, .
.,
i
.-

y
j.
PAINT FACTOfI (PR) , .






uT
u.
o
UJ
0.
t-






:-
7j
wl







	 j 	 J 	

/»! —

•iO i^=
-'o

'o
L43L
.',0
20
*'-•
,n
>->
W-

., s_





• •
. ?
.


c
JO1'1 I/-1







20 ^2
L£T_












*v>
.j.-
,, 1^-
So '-y' Zo i :>.o
/o ? ^>l 2o
- -,^<\^->
?.1
JJe-
'••.!3i2j ia-

C7,l £_ | fy.^
,-~2 s* • \ ,„ ,i-
•-.-7>! -/!
/o j
iO'^o
Jo!:.a

2o ! to
-i ! 1 - f1 '










A* I' - •
<• *i 3' ^""
r,V-i: - i
O'S v! C !
'"""•' 1 .
T;«710 1
•;r-J <- '•
(~-.-T! ;•
*" r.Vli ;
'.«r5l /S ' 30
'-- ' ! / S 2 3
,7
-,
y
>
n
r>
^
^

.



^



PPOtlUCT
lYPcC'-{.-iAy5

ffomf Oil

/one. O^L
F/TJllJHiSJ>»jJ &Jt.

JL KS-Oti 4ov
G'AX. ^uOE.

A^crtie tf«
^JBC 0/( 4aB
'Vorort. O /t
• ^ SE <3/i
	 1 ZtllSK. /5/t







1





i




r i
i — i — ,
t i
S'r—
	 ^— L_
i
> /fa 20 t
-?T

— -
--'If^j—
/^'zo!
.^i/.S -:,-'
0; • 1 /« ' ?3

"1
...:,'.'_ " " i

.- - *' c
-r ,*,-: !
j — iu;_:._J
• J 3 V - i i
rj'T - i
:.~^ 	 i
• ^' c •
/I .0
~7~T
f ., •:
~— — *
" "Tr
-1
23
2.9-
-;-

il
	
.tfi

--
'~
H
^
p
~
~
111.











/


1
J ~











/«^orsc. O /t

',°A'1/'
J-
(L
u
I

f"l
f
,/
t
f
^
A/







, 1
^
^
^
I

fj





„/!—
/^CTB /C ^ / c. 1 A/
•^5>To/« £>;£.
f O £t O /£
f(j£i. 0 1*-
Sftonit O/(_
£uRf, On.
/u3C <0 t
/^?fl TO ft. f) ft.
JL USE. 0 /L

rfoToa. O It.
stfoTbrl OIL

ft/

A/
A/
^/
A/
f
,
1
(
fJ
A/
£A\j5T1t. Ao
flomft. OIL,
fla-nt. OK.
f*f*TOt- Oft.
toBS. On.
	 t J-^, 0,c




1


i
.- :
—
•
^

._








. i i : s i
	
~™
_J
"--
-! 	 IT]
T«it Of.
^1.504. 95

CA u ynt-




*4oT»/t Of

, 	



^HOE Oft.













J0 dWai 30VU01S OAV








*
a
Q.
C.'
1-








j




















	 f
1







1 "






=>
c.
o
13
O
\\




























1
t
V. •! i ! 	
/
1
f
f
^«






/«! —
A*



f

An



A/




"T"










i




' — 1 —








1
f












— i —



















P.fMAHKi o/z.

.--,
- ,
•• c.
• —
" „
-T7

T^
_-—f
-:
--
•>'?.
5-

*^ ^^
;,-
^ *j"
i"3
^..
t-=i
- v
.. .,
V
.--,
: ^
57
T5-
•S"V
6T
f.j
5-7
Jf 	 1
'-.^
-'•4-
;..
iy
7-





,-,,

-., -•



• -;

-------
TANK
DATA
IOENT
* Go/
* 6t>?
fjaS
63^
60S
60S
607
60S
609
6/ o
6/ /
6/2.
6/3

/.r
/e
6/ 7

/ 0
?o
2t
22
? *
24
2J

?7
(?;>;»
0"23

ul
0.
H
£
C
' (.
C
C
r

^N
c
<-
r
r
*7
c


r










r
c
c
u
Q.
1







CAPACITY ,-.
s. o. u. i
(OOLS)
95
-%
.9S"
0 ^"
-• 3

Of
1 5J-






















S 3 ' 1 c !
652- c

3 J.
3*
^~
37
3?
3 P
4 *
•#/
A >J
•*J5

._.^
F






















1
r |
-ty!-
•s ;?!
6<'?i C
6J;
C
—

-
Di-(
OIA (FT)
^
6
g
^1

f.
6
^
.9S"I 6
:o"
ss

5S
So


j-




x





5"35
^
g
p
u.
1-
o
i
yn
2o
f-]
yo
7.0

20
?-5
7r>
•M
-,
R bo
^
R


(n










,5-
^>
'9-


?o






AVGOUTAGE(rT)























1



.•9?
' o *
S/ol/5 '29






£/->!/.r !2o

'ijo















,
o £
/i,
_y TQ
/5 [20

1















1
1
i ~"
.



*


i





! !
/o



SHELL
Cri
HI
e.
PAIHT FACTOR IFR)
_^|. -
p
-,
p
c?
f?
R
n
J>
p
f>
f
f>
.S


i;










•ff
,•1
•V






























ROOF
K
ul
u.
o
u
c.
h-
































iv ! ,
iV— i
v/















R
	

















/-H
(•II
Ul

—


























	





Vfi.




































PRODUCT
TTPECmiAME

/pse On.
jL u»IE /9/t
^"SE On Aov

/tJoTo/e. Ore
S°74CtJii>) C 0/£
/•lAtHi^E OlL
MoTt*. Oft.
sWAca/tJC. O *L
s**fa£lJjJi)C. Off-
/V/4ry//*'E OIL

^ ij 31 $ it- 4oo
A^XCI"/A/C ^/£


/uB6/3/« /4co










j^oSf- Gt f
/iiac On. Aot>
tons On. ADO
/b>se.0't A to
/tfte 0 "• A PP
- oA















^oFe O/t sjoo

OL
A/
^/
f
^/
A/
^
A/
f
f
A/
f
A/
A/
A/


A/










,f
A/
A/
A/
IS/
















^

' DATA
m

	 1






























	 '




















AVG STORAGE TEMP °F,




















































1 	 I
M
U.
0."
1-





















































AVG THROUGHPUT ^
(QDLAiO) £

SEMAWi /o '3
f.-l
-
	 1-.^































y-

if
•/"
--.-
, -
rr
~-r
'i !
-i "
* •?


^- -
.

-
•






i-j


•>• /
i--




















5?
















i_
7'

-------

-------
TAiK „
CAT A
C'i
IOEST
y<7/

7 ol

•JOS
706
~~7^f
I/a

f
/.v

/•£

/ 7
0.
H
,-7

I-

J£_
V






31
IU
0-
l/t
^






-




1 I1 •



/ 91
? o
19 /
"*?
? i

2 _.
26'
_
7"
g J

^ .
^ '
3 J
3 r

.5 ..
=»7
,g
i 9
•£ f>

^ ,
^ ""
•i-f-
'*


* n
< r-
£o

^




































CAPACITY
S. 0. H. --'
(03LS)
_

, . ,

.v=+g
-",:.,
_




P
n.
o
•"IJ
^.
•70

^2.
^
7-J.











~--*-


1






1




	 	 1 	 • 	
i










i
j










	






1
s f







•»<:



























13!?,
HCT 4£.iJ£
CAt> 57lC
C'tJ f4 FjJ f-.
f-^ow^G. d
s/fxeoZ^TAdf.










fjii. O't-




























.
f ,OATA
t£

*\*
l±

n -
7t
ro











A/





















•







UI
e.
O

,*


./
0 '
~









































1 AVO STORAGE TEMP °F

J.".
7"

7?
7o
TT1









































o
Ti
tt."

?*•
H

-*i
,'
"^


































AVO THROUGHPUT
(BaL/'MO) .t
fj'b
&oaO
e000

4& 	 1
V/,
JOB
fi//A




















SE.MAfJXS /=. /j-

•
•'
'

*" s

•i "
* <•£.










,









!
i






1












I
1




1













- _ „_

-------

-------
} 	 ' TAM'<
0*TA
iD=sr
of
0?
03


o7

09
X O
7/
/*
/3
/4
/^"
/ g
/ 7
Ul
C.

















/pi
	 " — 1
/ fl

J,.
"?
9 1
*•#
?y
26
?7
2-,
-g
..
, ,
T. ,
.j
3 J.
3J
~e
* 7
5"
	 12
f- a
: i




















1







t .,
v'  '7
yvA. tf^TK-tfJ
/>*o _•
T-W..J face.







































.




i
i
i
( i
L
i
1 !
•


-------
IDEHT
CAPACITY
S. 0. H.
(BULS)
                         DI.AS
                                     ^  FOOF
                                       u
                                       c.
                                                          FrtODUCT
                                               TfPECHSAMc
                                                                        u
                                                                    -:  i
...
C
GH
AVG TH
(QBL.'MO)
  JLL
 6J7
                                              .Mno
                     li
                                                            *' -'
                                                                                70
                                 >:  *.
                                       or-
                                                           liJs
                                                                     Z tf
                                                            4^1..
                                                                           17Q-0
                                                                                Tl
                                                                     f.a
                                                                           ITooo
   55'
^il
   7?
                 •;•"  i'J
                                  lofc!
                --.;| 90J43 L
                                                                   7°
                                                                          17310
                                              BT
                                                                     I 4-
                                               BT  Fe.eo
                                                               03
                                                                   7.
                                                                          i7JJ.
                                                                           Si tea
                                                                  7»
  J1I
   71
 ' .-  j
               T^-i/z  '.^i   i-vi   nr
                                                 0/3
                                                                                £.-.'
                      , 7   J
                                                 0/5
                                                _o£_
                          24-J
                                                ^£_
_fl£.2
 d.wS
   Oo
                     is  ',-s- I
                     /i'!.-3-S.

   53!   !
                    i	i—	
                        I   I   'I
   OAl   J
   UL
   i-J
                             ...{_
                    I    I
                                                         	i.
                                    - I  -  -!  J /..»e

-------

-------
j 7ANX

13= NT
C/

•r ^

UI
e.
i-
-i
— — i 	
i
1




0.31 I
«•- 1
1 T


1
•,-a I
ofl!

• **
••> 1


1
1
j

P5!
0-|
,;yj
, >
	 -JT —
7.M
97

_iz2
^;






( +»
^! d a
o «e













DIMS
P
u.
a




p
u.
I-
O
	



1
i
i










AVG OUTAGE(FT)






^ ^j KOOF
u
a.





PAI/JT FACTOR (PR)





i
f
\ 1

1














i !


i
1

_ i
j- i
^

1
.;7 J c !
.97*1 f- *
77



70'
.* i
\ 9 >, •
!~ •*<*
:=•/.?
""i 7

; Jj.3
.-.-/; so T
« .-it>
«/-sr
•Jj-f
-••>3ia

1


i
' F ;
1 r
f
;—

i-v:
'!->
^,

4S
--S
L-
-^H^
f






1

































i JL'eflo-
i)

•/
r,r
I.V
j




090



u!
u.
O
UI
^.
\-




















*'t
JJ
V '•
- ^
^
e.g.! OC
i



	 — — -•• •— i

!«"
uf



L2a_
' '-'O
On«ylSo -1-5 1 it/U«lTD
i r ' i ??->i.o 6 "7
rr
5. » .-,! j:

1
I

f 'jf,\ f. '
SOo
•
1
i __
•
i
1_
••vu-it:
:.*
67 1-iS '
** 1 "^ i 1 ** f


,->:la Uo !.L^
/ **V * *"• *" ' f ^ 5
IV
i-••• yj-l/JiT
1 f
T^"! —
j 7-..0 | ,.^ i^.^
1 V7*-.
'.'0
1 •: ?^-!//O
- 9 - ->oi •; -^3
'..-I'JllLl
T-'1-
i
•7?
1
' —
•*i*i
_£*_

J—
!
L.!£_
Lli
i.V"
i .1
i, .
O9n

0,0
.00
OCR
>«3
»t8
oJO
• 5.
fe
r •>
u



















—
*.
-
^
^.
~-




?.7(uucr
TYPE O-i.-iAMS





















pEjjU-A^f.
GAGo
5ToBM«!>IoL
rw/^A/£«
O//^J5*J£
3E*S£E*/£




' /ȣ(L/r/>/JC
^
„
s
CD ! r
ri
r-r-
±
.D
.'0

i"x
n~
r
^
-
^.
„
,


—
*-•
r
i :• -; 1 "
P

1-
! r
i -r
(S^^So
//fX^AJE
77>^c»ff-JE-
/"o«y/»e«s
Me, GAS

^^JSttD C.
t r**lJJ)£
e^ttupt
foSA-l
-^r^ 	
/^i ».*

-^Sf—
tf^j O/d

^™ .„*
,DA
0,
K




















>
//•
0,'
fj
o.t
3 o




SLOPE




















i
z.
a %

e.l
f




IE > i
// -
1,7
1.0
fj

H.o
3.<
3
LL
AIL
8^
to
u
k..
If;
AVC STORAGE TeMP °F




















«r
i
7-





C«
r
a
o.
h-




















8,8


fj
jf




(rfi


AVC THROUGHPUT
(DDL 'MO)




















J»003
'A^

v/a
X.«t7




ft£.\'A\'iii /=>2o^

uJ/c.
0»/e-
L>/»








ff/C.








T| /?(«, cr»,.n

"*T-
-^
~r'~
IS




J»o.0 7J Att*jifz*rt^ 	 J
* ,0 *.„ ,A...

0

7. /8
7-

t!7t,
I


1
I.
I.
1.
1.
ol
7«
?•
/'«"
Zs.
.!•
17.

7.
ll.
!;-
^
B
.
H£
1?.
«OP.
o *i 6 r..

+ »
6.?
2 1
£S_
49-
4.R
4.?

4 t

93 ffoo
5o...
7>ro«.
f£3."°
3e;iro
It; -JIB

J« ISO
5500
,.,) ji,«
±JL
7.V
Toife«o
7o». ec.

7*
74-
7•*
''I
£2 i
-n
ll.
-» %
7 j '
7S

7,

-------
                    TAHX
       DATA
IDENT
      'zii Si
              f+i
             3 .x s
                               SHELL
                                      ROOF
                                                        PSODUCT
                                                                                    REMARKS
                                             TYPE oa NAME
                                                 is:
AVC THROUGHPUT
(EDL/MO)
                                                                nS
                                                                       7« i o • •
 /oo?
                                                                US.
                                                                I'f
                               .Vr
                                             CAS OK
                                                                              7-?
                                                                        647S»
                                                                              71
                    2&=
JUL
£.
Qjl_
                                                                              T-i
  oft
   0.9
  /o
  jL£
      P- I
                                     J2JL
                                                 Qjt.
                     j±
  JLS.
  /s
  24
  3 J
  34
  JLZ.
 -12.
  39
                      1_{	
                      _l_
                  4-k

-------

-------
| TAMX .
DATA
(DENT
o/
07
03
04.
OS

34-07
3*o6
5*03

/f
/Z
13

• fg
/6

/(>
1 "
94^0
S*?/
22

2-f
2J
ZS

?K
79
io
.1 /
?2
33
34
3S
W
17
JS

4c
•#/
 Zg.


Ol.{
P
u.
Q





,MJ
«*?

/;J5
HCT (FT)





In'*
^ol
Pn
n«'v-
/;iS-j ^4-









(.,45
//*?


i
I




1 !


r
i











•
i
j










P










—


















AVC OUTACE(FT)



















30 'M.S.
-->--



o5o



1
• ~r '




1




I
i











<• i • : "•*


















• i
i
i












1


• i

i

/7*?
'Jo7-



SHcLL
Ul
a.
l-





r>
p
vi
t?
I/-/


PAINT FACTOR ;,o«












Rt.'UR. /»23






•j.
'•i'=
'•5
7 '
-J^









!•:
1 5"












i









1





J*
















1
• / -•
!vcr

-------
1 —
f '.»
ID£MT
^•r/
S4--T'
v^

£>3fii*
3'o J-K
vt)>£oj-

.Li,, 3


B'*

y
U
PAINT FACTOR (FR)
-•OOf
"."•T
c:
u!
11.
o
u
c.
til •*
»*


a. 1c
->J06B
•/ Lj»


a l*»


	 I



1

1

P
r
	 ^ — r~T5"^~* ; 	 fT~




'



\




,.,




i
«i

C.A
P
P*
o

a,




P.I


F',j




1)
u
^
„

^
r
,
r

_-




~


*




1
PRODUCT
TYPE OH MAME

645o
DC,
re.T-
3£T




n.
f°~
3"

'll
4J
j.i
t5

/.3




4?


2-
A,'
A/

—
u
o.
o
,
I


B tf
.
a J

3




t.






i
....u
AVC STORAGE TcV.P 'JFJC
To
1-


7-
7°
7-

7o




to


1"


—

js_
O
M
r.
Ci."
H
6?



il
,?
z^

/o




?*


./I





AVG THROUGHPUT
(DQL/j.,0) ?
91,0.0
«...„>


6 «0
/(UOOO
e.co.

/I. 000




?«6.7r«


S2« ooo





SiJ'ASKi ,"24-
•O
Ti"
^3 •

•j
7/

5?




75


74-
3 /
f. J



A/oTCJ '
                            f tf on** frotnj f/j rietrte
                £*r ,

-------
APPENDIX  F




FLARE DATA

-------
                                               FLARES
                                         EL SECUNDO REFINERY
                                                                                                      (F)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
FCCU
Type Zink, Elevated
Height, Ft. 167.5
Dia (At tip), Ft. 4
Effluent Velocity, fps 330
Effluent Temp, °F. Normal 80-100
Design 275
Rating, 106 Btu/Hr. (a)
Tons/Hr. 345
Amount Flared T/Yr. N
% of Time 0.1
Max. Capy, % of Rated 100
Type Ignition Continuous
Pilot
Sulfur Content of (b)
Flared Gas
Source of Flared Gas Principally FCCU
Occasional inter-
refinery
Coker
Zink, Elevated
150
4
163
230
(a)
650
270
0.1
100
Continuous
Pilot
(b)
Delayed Coker
Isomax
Zink, Elevated
150
4
163
225
(a)
650
N.A.
100
Continuous
Pilot
(b), usually Nil
Isomax Complex
Ammonia
Zink, Elevate<
100
1
106
100
(a)
7.5
N.A.
100
Continuous
Pilot
Nil
NH3-H2S Plant
(a)   BTU of flared gas will vary widely.
(b)   Sulfur content:   Variable depending  on source of flared gas.

-------
   APPENDIX  G

SOURCE TEST DATA
    FCC UNIT

-------
134 SOUTH  SAN PDJRO STREET. LOS ANGELES.  CALIF.  90013 - MADISON- 9-^471!/ COUNTY  OF LOS ANGELES
                                          5EST
                                      CONDUCTED. AT
                           STANDARD OIL COMPANY OP CALIFORNIA
                                VEST EL SEGUHDO BOULEVARD
                                 EL SEGUNDO,  CALIFORNIA

                                           ON

                                    February 25, 1975
                                                                          D
                    APR2975LRPX
                               \
                                         REPORT
                                         ON THE

                      HUSSIONS PROM A CARBON MONOXIDE BOILER AND
                          FROM A WET SCRUBBER SERVING A FLUID
                               CATALYST REGENERATING UNIT
                                                                  Cl r ENC"»
                                                                     "
          GEf'E^L KWARER
                                                                  fr.i CCP* . «:
           A. J. Wilson
           M. A. Ballas
   Supv. A. ?.  Engineer II
Sr. Air Pollution Engineer
                                       TEAM NO.  4
                                 SOURCE TESTING  SECTION
                                    REPORT i:0. C-22^1
          Robert J. MacKnight
          Director of Engineering
           Howard BeVorkin
  Supv.  A. P.  Engineer III
                                  ISSUED   /IPR 28 1975

-------
         AIR POLLUTl/  CONTROL DISTRICT - COUNTY OP ^  ANGELES

C-22'H
^
                                                                         2,25-75
INTRODUCTION
Upon the request of Mr. Willard F. Ganther,  Sr.  A.  P.  Engineer,  of the Refinery
Unit, a source test was conducted to determine emissions from the stack of the
CO boiler and the stack of the wet separator at the Standard Oil Co. Refinery
located at J2^ West El Segundo Boulevard,  El Segundo,  California.  Both units
are associated with the fluid catalyst regenerating unit.

The tests were conducted by Source Test Teaa No. *l, consisting of Andrew J.
Wilson, l-'iaurice A. Ballas, llichael Gudlow, and Jerry Kraim.  llr. Ganther was
present during the tests and his recorded observations are appended to this
report.  Test arrangements were made with Messrs. James Daily and 3U R. Ray,
Air Pollution Coordinators for Standard Oil Co.

TEST RESULTS AMD. DISCUSSION

The CO boiler participate emission appeared in compliance with Rule 5ft —
emitting only 15.5 pounds per hour of solid participates.

Dnission of particulates (both solid and total) at the wet separator stack
(also called the quench-drura stack) was 0.02 pound per hour.  These and other
test. results are suoznarized on pages 3 to 7 inclusive.

The FCC unit was tested under the follovring conditions:  (l) the unit •.•:2.E run
at or near its rated throughput, (2) no waste gases from other units \.-ere
incinerated in the firebox of the CO boiler, and (?) no fuel oil was fired
in the CO boiler.

The CO emissions from the wet separator stack v;ere greater than 1# during the
first test.  It was discovered that Standard Oil personnel had inadvertently
left the catalyst dump valve partially open.  A second test for CO with the
catalyst dump valve in the closed position showed no CO emissions.

•PROCESS DESCRIPTION

Petroleum products are continuously fed to a reactor and passed -through a
fluid catalyst bed which, under high temperature, and pressure, cracks or fragments
the petroleum products into new, smaller molecular weight compounds which are
continuously removed frora the reactor.  The catalyst used in 'the cracking
process becomes coated with carbon and other impurities which destroy the
catalytic action and, therefore, the catalyst must be cleaned and reactivated
before it can be reused.

The catalyst is continuously recirculated from the reactor to a regenerator
and back to the reactor.  The catalyst is regenerated by burning carbon and
oti'-r impurities from the surface of the catalyst by using air in n control] cd
co'noustiori process.  Vented gases from the regenerator contain various air
CGntaraii/~nts such as catalyst dust, carbon monoxide, cyanides, a-saonia, sulfur
oxides  ?-:id nitrocen oxides.  To reduce emission  of these air contaminants to
the atmosphere, the regenerator exhaust gases are passed through cyclones,  an

-------
         AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT - COUNTY OP LOS ANGELES

 C-22ln                                                                    Page 2
                                                                          2-25-75


 electrical  precipitator, and a waste heat boiler ("CO boiler") and then are
 discharged  to  the ataosphere.  The cyclones and the electrical precipitator
 collect catalyst dust and other particulates from the exhaust gases.  The
 CO boiler oxidizes the carbon monoxide, ammonia, and other combustible
 material.

 The wet separator (quench drum) is the emission control device for the
 vacuum eductor (or pneunatic conveyor) gases used in the catalyst fines
 transfer system froa the precipitator.  The system is also used for new
 catalyst make  up.

 SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

 .All tests were made in accordance with the procedures in the Source Testing
 Manual of the  Air Pollution Control District.  Diagrams of the sampling
 trains used are shown on pages 14 and 15.  The iapinger solution and probe
 washings from  the CO boiler water train were filtered through a tared Gooch
 crucible.   Both the Gooch collection and the filtered solution were dried at
 105PC and weighed.  The material collected on the Gooch filter plus the
 material collected on the thimble constituted the "insolubles."  The sulfuric
 acid  content of the dried, soluble impinger residue was determined by titration.
 The weight  of  the sulfuric acid (as H2SOV2H20) was subtracted from the total
 collected weight to determine the solid partieulates from the CO boiler.

 The solid particulates from the wet scrubber stack were determinpd in the same
 Banner with the exception that no attempt was made to differentiate between
 solubles and insolubles.

 Carbon monoxide emissions were estimated by use of MSA length-of-stain
 indicator tubes and determined on integrated samples by TCA (Total Combustion
 Analysis).

 The velocity traverse was conducted on the CO boiler stack by traversing
 half-way across the stack from two different ports 90° apart.  From prior
•test  results it could be assumed that the results of traversing by this
 method would give essentially the same values as traversing all the way
 across the  stack by the standard procedure.  The reason this was not done,
 was that there was no suitable Pitot tube available.
                                  Approved

-------
AIR  POLLUTION/- ONTROL Dl STR ICT- - -COUNTY     LOS ANGELES
                        /-
 TEST NO-  C-22»H
                                                      PAGE.

                                                      DATE.
 NAME  OF  FIRM
                     SUMMARY:   EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE
                 Standard Oil Co. of California
 LOCATION OF PLANT.

 TYPE  OF  OPERATION .
                 West El Ssgundo Boulevard,  El Segundo,  California

           Oil Refinery                  _•	
 UNIT Tf."gn_ CO Boiler
RULE NO.
                                    MEASURED
                                    EMISSIONS
     ALLOWABLE
     EMISSIONS
 52             PARTICULATE
               MATTER

 53             SULFUR COMPOUNDS
               AS S02

 53.67          S-COMPS. AS S02

 54             SOLID pARTICULATE
               MATTER

 58.68.1        COMBUSTION
               CONTAMINANTS

 67             COMBUST.CONTAMS.

               NOX AS  N02

 68             NOX AS N02


 71             CARBON  MONOXIDE
                                      GRAINS
                                      PER SCF

                                      PPM BY VOL.


                                      LB. PER HR.
                              15-5     LB.  PER MR.
                                  	 GRAINS PER
                                   SCF AT  12% C02
                             119
 LB.  PER MR.

 LB. PER MR.


 PPM  BY VDI .
 AT 3% 02

. % BY VOL.
2000
                         GR A I N 5
                          PEW SCF


                          PPM CY VOL.



                          LB. PER MR.
  30    1.0. PFR HR.
   	GHAINS PER
    SCF AT 12% C02

   	  Lu.  PER MR.

         I.EI.  PER MR.
                                                           0.2
         PPM  BY VOL.

         AT 3% 02

         % (1Y VOL.
   NOTES:    ALL RESULTS ON DRY (OR EQUIVALENT) OASIS._UNLESS OTHERWISE  NOTED
                                                                            55D29 n-1

-------
        AIR POLLUTION'  ONTROL DISTRICT---COUNTY     LOS ANGELES
TEST MO-  C-22'H
PAGE.
                                                                 2-2>-75
                    SUMMARY:   EMISSIONS  TO ATMOSPHERE
rXAML Ol r 1 K<
LOCATION OF
TYPE OF OPER
UNIT TESTED
RULE NO.
52
53"
53.67
54
56.68.
67
67
60
71
71.-

PI ANT 52'1 West E1 Segundo
,4TlftM Oil Refinery

Wet Separator

PART ICUL ATE* . 0
MATTER
SULFUR COMPOUNDS
*.s S02
S-CO'IPS AS SQ~
SOLID PART ICUL ATE "
MATTER
COMBUSTION _
CONTAMINANTS
COMBUST. CONTAMS.
NO.. AS NO,
NOX AS NOa
CARBON MONOXIDE*^
Carbon Monoxide (bi 0



Boulevard, El Segundo,




MEASURED
EMISSIONS
.OOjS GRAINS
PER SCF
PPM BY VOL.
LB. PER MR.
• 02 |_Bi PEP MR.
GRAINS PER
SCF »T 127. CO?
LB. PLR MR.
LO. PER HA.
PPM BY VOL.
AT 3% 02
.*.: ._ . • * BY un| -
.0 < by Vnl .



California

-


ALLOWABLE
EMISSIONS
0.? GRAINS
Ptn SCF
npu HV wni
Ln. PEW mi.
1.00 Lo. PER nn.
GRAINS PER
SCK AT 12% CO 2
LB. PER HH.
Lo. PTR HR.
PPM BY VOL .
AT 3% 02
°'2 % DY VOL.
n.? % by Vol.


  NOTES:    ALL KFSULTS ON DRY  (OR EOUI VAI ENT) BASIS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
           (a) Carbon monoxide concentration was 1.'i£ with the catalyst durrp valve
              open.
           (b) Ho CO could be detected with the catalyst dump valve closed (see
              discussion under "Test Results").                          55D29 R-l

-------
               AIR POLLUTION p^NTROL  DISTRICT  -  COUNTY Of- LOS  ANGELES
TEST NO._Cr?Mi -
                               SUMMARY  OF DATA AND  RESULTS                 TF   2-25-75
 TEST SITE,  EQUIPMENT,  AND TEST CONDITIONS:
      I.  NAME OF  FIRM    Standard Oil Co. of California
      2.  BASIC FoiiiPMFMT  Fluid Catalytic Cracking Unit
      3.  CONTROL EQUIPMENT    Cyclones, Electrical Precipitator,  CO Boiler, Wet Separator
      4.  EQUIPMENT TESTED  CO Boiler^ Sfe.ck		
      5.  PROCESS VE.GHT,  LBS PER  HOUR    in excess of 1,000,000	
                          Normal
      6.  TESTING CONDITION		_	
      7.  SAMPLING LOCATION:                                   CO Boiler Stack

 GAS FLOW AND ANALYSIS:
      6.  GAS TEMPERATURE,*F 	
      9.  GAS VELOCITY,  FPS ___ 51 -3
     IO.  GAS FLOW RATE,  SCFM (WET) _
         GAS  FLOW RATE.  SCFM (DRY) _______ _ 155t3CX)
     II.  GAS  ANALYSIS,  VOL %, DRY BASIS:
              CAK3ON DIOXIDE  _ . _ ^?-
                                                                  **
              OXYGEN
                                                                  0*0
              CARBON MONOXIDE
                                                                 Op 7
              NITROGEN __ " *'
     12.  GAS ANALYSIS, VOL %,  WET BASIS:
                                                                 20.6
              WATER VAPOR 	
              CARBON DIOXIDE
              OXYGEN 	
              CARBON MONOXIDE
              NITROGEN 	
 AIR CONTAMINANTS MEASURED:
     t3.  MATERIAL COLLECTED	Solid Particulates	.	SQx	
                                                                      H2S04-2HSO        S02
     14.  TOTAL GAS VOLUME  SAMPLED, SCF 	3^.50	21.00	21.00
     15.  WEIGHT COLLECTED,  GRAMS 	0.026O*	0.021	0.392
     16.  MATERIAL CONCENTRATION:
              GRAINS PER SCF (WET)
              GRAINS PER SCF (DRY)        	
              GRAINS PER SCF AT  12% COg	
              PARTS PER MILLION BY  VOLUME
     17.  MATERIAL FLOW RATE,  LBS PER  HOUR  _ 15»5 - ?P'5.
 EFFICSENCY OF CONTROL EQUIPMENT:
     18.  MATERIAL IN,  LBS PER HOUR
     IS.  MATERIAL OUT, LBS PER HOUR - 15-5 - 2Q.5
     20.  EFFICIENCY,  %
    21. Insoiubles, %                              1"?.5
    22. Carbon Monoxide, ppra by TCA _ 130
           * Includes O.OOJ5 em insolublea.

                                                                                       60D489.R.

-------
              AJR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT  - COUNTY 0&- LOS  ANGELES

TEST NO._C=«!L!	         SUMMARY OF  DATA AND RESULTS               j^g   2-25-75
 TEST SITE,  EQUIPMENT,  AND  TEST CONDITIONS:
      I.  NAME OF  FIRM     Standard Oil Co. of California
      2.  BASIC rqinPuFuT  Catalyst Pneumatic ConVeylng System
                             Vet Separator
                            •Vet Separator
3. CONTROL EQUIPMENT
4. EQUIPMENT TESTED .
5. PROCESS WEIGHT,  LBS PER  HOUR
6. TESTING CONDITION   Catalyst. T>i!np Valvo On°n
                                       100
                                                                           1>vr-» Valv
      7. SAMPLING LOCAT.ION:  Vet Separator Stack

 GAS FLOW AND ANALYSIS:
      8. GAS TEMPERATUR
      9. GAS VELOCITY,  FPS
                                                            Wet Separator Stack
              OXYGEN
              NITROGEN
              OXYGEN
              CARBON
              NITROGEN
 AIR CONTAMINANTS MEASURED:
IIPF, "IT
. FPS
E, SCFM (WET
. SCFM (DRY)
, VOL %, DRY
n 10x1 fie .

MONOX IDE
H
, VOL %, »ET
APOD
p |nx lor

66
67.1
, 788
770
BASI Si
2.1
17.5
1.1
79.3
BASIS:
2.2





0.0
20.8
(None detected bv TCA)
79.2


"\^
unwonnr ^-^
M 	 ^*>^
                                 Particulatcs
14. TOTAL GAS VOLUME SAMPLED, SC
15. WEIGHT COLLECTED, GRAMS
16. MATERIAL CONCENTRATION:
GRAINS PFR SCF (WET! _
GRAINS PER SCF (DRY)
GRAINS PER SCF AT 12% CO
PARTS PER MILLION BY V
17. MATERIAL FLOW RATE, LBS PER
EFFICIENCY OF CONTROL EQUIPMENT:
18 MATERIAL IN, LBS PER HOUR
19. MATERIAL OUT, LBS PER HOUR
Solid Particulates
j) 46.8?
0.011

0.0036

2
(M ""r
un,,B 0.02

0.02
•
Total Particulates
*l6.87
0.011

0.0056


0.02

0.02

"



*







                                                                                      60D489.R

-------
              AIM wmrnoN  cm-no.  DISTRICT  - COUNTY or  ins

Tc.it No.  C-22-'r1
 RESULTS OF ANA1.YSES
         FOR
Nitrogen Oxides and Carbon Monoxide
                                       Page
                                       'Date   2-23-75
I
(JCWIWDNT:
TEST ST-VriON
' 'I
CDNCFjVnUTIONS. PPM DRY B-VSIS |
Sample 1;
2:
3:
h:
A. AMRAGC COXCN. , PP\I (DRV)
R. Conxeision factoi , ppii tograins/sc f
(o.onnmjue * Moicc. \\t.)
C. Avg. Concn. , grains/scf (dr>)
U x B)
D. Stack pas flow rate, scfm («ct)
F.. ttatcr \apor in gases, vol. %
f. Stack gas flo« rate, scfm (dry)
D( 1-0.0 1C)
C. Flo-* rate, pounds per hour
0.00357 \ C x F
II. Control Efficiency. Z
Npx
as
N02
CO Boiler
Stack
10?
102


105
I
0.0008't9
0.0891
195500
20.6
155300
11Q

CO
CO Boiler
Stack
150

•

130




•


CO
Catalyst
Dump Valve
Open
V/et Separator
Stack
10700
10300
11100

10900







CO
Catalyst
Dump Valve
Closed
Uet Separator
Stack
none
deLect-ed



0





•

                                                    jio IM

-------
                   AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT •• COUNTY OF.'.OS ANGELES
TEST NO.C-2241	                                             PAGE _
                                                                              8
SAMPLING STATION _CO_Joiler_SUck_
                                                                  HATF  2-25-75
                       SAMPLING  TRAIN DATA AND  CALCULATIONS  (DRY BASIS)

TIME
1:10
+5
+10
+15
+20
<25
+30
-O5
+40
+45
+50
+55
+60


60 nan.
net



•
C.A, t.
READING
CU. FT.
VH
]
899.25
902.9
906.2
909.5
912.7
916.0
919.6
92?.1
926.5
q^o.o
c'33.4
9-55.7
I 9'io.09
I

40.B4
net.




L tt h
VAC.
IN. KG
PM
LO Train
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.0
4.6
4.6
4.6
4.5
A.6
4.4
4.4
4.4


4.3
avg.




IMPINOIR
TtMP .
°F
TI

56
56
56
56
54
54
54
55
54
56
54
53


55
avg.





VM
552.02
554.1
557.1
558.4
560.2
562.1
563.8
565.5
567.2
569.2
571.5
57^.5
575-19


23-17
net.





PM
NaOI-
4.8
4.9
0.9
2.2
2.0
1.7
2.0
2.0
3.0
2.4
2.2
1.9


2.4 '
avg,





TI
I Train
58
60
62
58
58
56
56
60
60
60
62
60


59
avg.





Thimble
Temp.
op

220
240
186
210
f'.O
"' >
K-J
202
210
.208
?00
189













































"








                       Solid Particulates
                                                   Sulfur Oxides
MATLK1AL (.ULI.ll. 1 C.U 	 . 	 ; 	
H2
WEIGHT COLLfCIED. GSAMS:
Intaincers f insoluble) 0.0015
ImoiriKcrs (soluble) 0.1355 Thimble . _
Thinble 0.002 Imp infers
"iLess H?SOJ;-2H20) (-0.113)
o np6
A TOTAL WEIGHT G'ius w.ueu


D, VtPOff PfttSSURt Of AATER AT IMP. UMP.. J-N. Hri
F. TOTAL CAS VOLUME SAMPLED, EM-D'C) . scftonr) .
r. u.TCDiii rnvru 15.43 X A/F . GRA 1 MS/5C F ( 0(- T )
?JL«2H20 SOp o r- IT r- i
a) /,,\ METCR TE«p. = 60 ' IT.C. j
l"» fl Q *A
SftMI'Llllft POINTS '"'
0.021
A'TMOS. pfitssuRE. ,_ _
0.021 0.392 Pft, IN. HC -^ -
155300
25.7 ?';-6
0.436 ' O.'tfrt
35.10 ?!.-*>
34.50 ?-.oo
U> (b)
0.0116 O.'"'r>4 p !>Rfin
                                pjxn as 502
                                                                   or.

-------
                  AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT -• COUNTY OF .LOS  ANGLLtb





TEST NO.  C-22»H                                                     PAKF       9
SAMPLING
PERCEI
A. GAS P
B. VAPOR
C. GAS v
D. WATER
E. WATER
r. WATER
G. TOTA
H. TOTAI
•J. PER
DRY
K. GAS r
L. O-S.S T
GAS
L STATION CO Boiler Stack
DATr 2-25-75
WATER VARDR, DRY GAS FLOW RATE, AND GAS DENSITY CALCULATIONS
hIT WATER VAPOR IN GASES
PESSUBE AT METfR* Pi — P IN HG ABS
PRESSURE OF WATER AT IMP- TEMP., IN. HG
OKlur ur-rrprn, VM x VI. 9. STF 	 	
VAPOR METFRtP, C X P'/A, SCF

VAPOR COND.. VAPOR VOL.. 0.0464 X E. SCF
L WATER VAPOR IN GAS SAMPLE) D + F. SCF


CENT WATER VAPOR IN C*5 SAMrLtt i«« « w" —
GAS FLO* RATE
IDA RATE- SCFM 1ȣT)

DENSITY CORRECTION FACTOR
H20 Train
25.7
0.4-36
' 35.10
0.60
180
8.35
8. OK

20.6
195,500
155,300

COMPONENT
V/ATER
CARBON DIOXIDE
OXYGEN

NITROGEN & INERTS

TOTAt
UnimilAD WT 1 R UT
\OL. V>00
(DRY)

0.132
O.tfH
0.000
0.82?

1.000
or STACK CA
MOISTURE
CORRECTION -
(1-j/iOO)

0.79*1
0.79^
0.79^
0.791*


5 	
VOL.VIOO'
(WET) '
0.206
0.105
0.032
0.000
0.657

1.000

MOL. WT. =
18.0
44.0
32.0
28. 0
20.2



WEKKT
P£K MOLE OF
STACK GAS
3.7
n.6
1.0
0.0
1~.5


** 'jf*
 N.  DENSITY Of GAS  DEFERRED  TO AIR = M/28.95  -.





 0.  GAS DENSITY CORRECTION f*CTOR =   Vl.OO/N=.
                                                                                   r.OD'.DO R-1

-------
                 AIR POLLU/  N CONTROL DISTRICT •- COUNTY 
-------
TEST NO.
                     POLLUT;^ CONTROL DISTRICT •• COUNTY ot LOS ANGELES

                                                                   PAGE	it
SAMPLING STATION  Wet Separator Stack
                                                                  .DATE.
                        SAMPLING TRAIN DATA AND CALCULATIONS  (CRY OASIS)
TIME
11:02
410
420
+JO
+40
+50
456




56 ipivi.
npt








(,!,•> Ml »l>
READING
CO. TT.
VK
VAC.
IN. HG
PM
trip i tiOt R
Teuc .
°r
T!
516.70
\ 526.2
536.^
5't6.9
557.**
568.0
57^.26




57.r;6
net








>l.6
5.1
5-Jt
5.4
5.^
5.3




5.2
avr.








52
56
57
57
55
56




56
aw.








•
























































,





































































 MATERIAL  COLLECTED
                                Particulates
  WEIGHT COLLECTED, GRAMS:
Jjnpingors
0.010
Slninble 0.001
(XiSSS fl2SDV 2rIpOJ
(-O.OOO)
  A. TOTAL WEI GMT.Ga IMS
                                   0.011
  B. STACK CAS FLOW RATE,
               AT MEIER. PA—PM- '*••  Hw ASS.  —


D. VAPOR PRESSURE Of  V.ATER AT IMP.  TEMP.. IN. HC


E. GAS VOLUME WETEHED,  VM x C/29.9. SCF   .,  .


F. TOVAL CAS VOLUME SAMPLED, EIU-0/CI. SCf(ORV)


G. MATERIAL CONCN..  15.13 xA/r. OHAINS/SCF(DBV]
                                                                    METEH TEMP. =60° f (T.C.)

                                                                    SAWK ING POINTS _?	


                                                                    SAMPIIKG NOZZLE  t i
                                                                            I . 0 . ,  MM _-** '

                                                                    ATMOS.  fRLSSURc.
                                                      O.'l52
                                                      o.oo'-;6

-------
                 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT  -• COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
TEST NO.



SAMPLING
                                                                     PAGE.
                                                                               12
                     Vet Separator Stack
   DATE   2-25-75
                WATER VAPOR,  DRY GAS FLO// RATE,  AND GAS DENSITY CALCULATIONS


  PERCENT WATER VAPOR" IN GASES
A. GAS PRESSURE AT METER, PA _ PM .  IN.  HG ABS.



B.



c.



D.



C. WATER VAPOR CONDENSED. LIQUID  VOL.. ML
   VAPOR PRESSURE or WATER AT IMP- TCHP..  IN. He




   GAS VOLUME METERED, VM  X A'29.9. SCF 	




   V/ATER VAPOR METERED, C X B/A, SCF 	
 0.870
                                                                  20
 C.




 H.





.J.
   V/ATER VAPOR CONO. .  VAPOR VOL.. 0.0464  X E. SCF .




   TOTAL  WATER  VAPOR IN CAS SAMPLEt  D + F.  SCF




   TOTAL  CAS  VOLUME  SAMPLED,  C + F.  SCF 	
                                                                  • 0.93
 1.00
'18.67
                                        .«« „ .-/^                  3-7 (contains droolet.
    PER  CENT  WATER VAPOR IN GAS SAMPLE* 100 X G/H	=	

                                       (actual saturation at 66°P = 2.2
    DRY GAS FLOW RATE
K. GAS FLO:.  RATE. SCFM UET>
                                                                 788
   GAS FLO*  RftTL. Kll-J'100). SCFM (t>Rvl .




   GAS DENSITY  CORRECTION FACTOR
                                                                JffiL
COMPONENT
WATER
GABOON DIOXIDE
OXYGEN
CARBON MONOXIDE
NITROGEN & INERTS

TOTAL
tfni r/>nl AD KrrtftlJT
\0i. V100
(DRY)
TX^
0.021
0.175
0.011
0.793

1. 000
OF STACK GA
MOISTURE
c CORRECTION ••
(l-j/100)
T^xd
0.978
0.978
0.978
0.978


s 	 —
VOL. 1J 100
UET) *
O.OP2
0.020
0.171
0.011
0.776

1.00O

MOL. WT. =
18.O
At> .O
32.0
20.0
28.2



*£IC-HT
PER MOLE OF
STACK GAS
o.n
0.9
• 5.5
o.3
?.1.9


, po-n
N. DENSITY OF  CAS REFERRED TO AIR = M/28.95  =.



o  T.AS  nrusiTy coRRfTiON FACTOR =   V\7oo/H~.

-------
                  AIR POLLU^  %N CONTROL DISTRICT  -• COUNTY Q  '-OS ANGELES



TEST NO.  C-22*H _                                              PAGE
SAMPLING STATION    Wet Separator Stack
                                                                   DATc    2-25-75
                                   GAS VELOCITY DATA
TIME
ICF:!2!
























Poirir
1
2
^5
4



avg.

















VEL. HEAD
IN. H20
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5





















TEMP.
°F
66






bb

















VELOCITY
FT/SEC
78,7
81.5
81.5
81.5



80.8

















VEL. HEAD
IN H20
1.4
1.5
1.5
1.5





















TEMP.
°F
66






bb

















VELOCITY
FT/SEC
78,7
81.5
81.5
81, •}



80.8









-







VEL. HE«O
IN: H20
1.*
1.5
1.5
1.5





















TEMP.
°F
66
,





bb

















VELOCITY
FT/SEC
78. Y
81.5
81.5
81.5



80.8

















A.
B.
c'.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
J.
K.
L.
M
INDICATED VELOCITY (TRAVERSE) FT'SEC—
INDICATED VELOCITY (REFERENCE PT.I FT/SEC

PlTOT CORRECTION FACTOR 	
Gi«t nruciTv CORRECTION FACTOR
GAS PRTSSURE IN STACK, IN. KG. AB5.
GAS PRESS. CORREC. FACTOR, ^29-9/F
CORRECTED VELOCITY, AxDxF.xG, FT/SFC
OR BxCxDxFxG, FT/SFC
AREA OF FLUE, so. FT.
AVERAGE FLUE TEMPFRATURF, °F.
FLOV; RATE, HxJx60. CFM ._
FLOW HATE. 
-------
               AIR POLLUTldK CONTROL DISTRICT --  COUNTY OF t--> ANGELES
TEST.NO.
                                                              PAGE
                                                              HATF     2-25-75
                               SAMPLING APPARATUS
                                      For
                                particulates
                                                  G
            100
100   „, dry
                         J. SAMPLING PROBE
                         2. IMPINGER (OUST CONCENTRATION SAMPLER)
                         3. ICE BATH CONTAINER
                         4. DRY F..Ttp Uhatman Thimble	
                         5. THERMOMETER
                         6. MERCURY MANOMETER
                         7. SPRAGUE DRY GAS METER (ZEPHYR NO. IA)
                         8. VACUUM PUMP
                         9. HOSE CLAMP TO CONTROL GAS FLOW RATE

                            IMPINGER SOLUTION -Dft.inni7.Rc1 Water.
                                                                                I6-5EO16

-------
               Atn PCLUSr'ON CONTROL DISTRICT
TY f LOS ANGELES
TEST KO.
     PAGE _ . 15—

            2-25-75
                                SAMPLING
                                       For
                       1. SAHPL ING PRODE_
                       2. DRY FiLten	Lil.
                       3. IHPIHGER (OUST C
                       4. Ice BATH CONTM:
                       5. THEIIMOHETER
                       6. MEPCURY MAHOMET
                       7. SPRAGUE DRY  GAS
                       0. VACUUM PUMP
                       9. HOSE  CL^HP TO  c.

                          lUPIHGER SOLUTI.
.c
•«N SAMPLER)



;y« no.  JA)

"LOW RATE
                                                                                t6.SS.Ot5

-------
               AIR POLLUIJ/"' CONTROL DISTRICT - COUNTY OF >"S ANGELES
                              ENGINEERING  DIVISION
              OBSERVATIONS DURING SOURCE  TEST  NO.
NAUE Of                                                          DATE OF
        STANDARD OIL COMPANY OT CALIFORNIA	   „„  February ?•%. 1Q7-S


"" c7fiT  CO Boiler Stack; Quench Drum, Catalyst Handling System.."1""^    A-80700

 HOURS or     £]*•"•         n«.M.
OBSERVATION :F
-------
AIR POLUiriN CONTROL DISTRICT - COUNTY 0& 'OS ANGELES
               ENGINEERING  DIVISION
OBSERVATIONS DURING  SOURCE  TEST  NO.
FCC DATA
Reactor Feed Bate
      Frcbh Feed, EPD                 1*5 H
      Recycle Feed, BPD                9.2 H
Regeneration Air Rate, CFM           100 M
Catalyst Circulation Rate, tons/min   6j
Flue Gas Tccp.(After Cottrell) °F    550
Regeneration Temperature °F
      Dense Phase, Average          1185
      Flue Gas Out                  10JO
Coke Burnoff Rate, Ibs/hr.            38.8 M
Regeneration Pressure (Top) PSIG      l'f,0

CO BOI1ER DATA
Combustion Air Rate, CTK              50 K
Inlet Regeneration Gas Tcnp.,  °F     527
Inlet Regeneration Gas Press., EgO    11.2
Steam Production Rate Ibs/hr.         250 H
Stean Torep. °F                       ?JO
Stcara Pressure PSIG                  800
Firebox Teop. °F                    1660
Fuel Gas Rate CFJI                    200 M
% 02 in Flue Gas                       1.2
  Fuel Oil Rate B/hr.                  -0
Flue Gas Tenp.                       770

VACUUtl UD'JCTOR, CATALYST TRANSFER SYSTEM
Steajn PresBure to Eductor             22 PSIG
Eductor Vacuusn                         6 Inches of Water
                                                         nr.t _ «i	

-------
    APPENDIX  H

  SOURCE TEST DATA
SULFUR RECOVERY UNIT

-------
434 SOUTH SAN PEDRO STREET.  LOS  ANGELES. CALIF. 90013 - MAO ISDN 9-4711 /COUNTY  OF LOS ANGELES
                                              TESTS
                                          CONDUCTED AT

                                      STANDARD OIL COMPANY
                                          OF CALIFORNIA
                                      VEST EL SEGUNDO BOULEVARD
                                     EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA

                                               ON

                                      JANUARY 10 & 11, 1973
                                             REPORT
                                             ON THE

                             EMISSIONS TO THE ATMOSPHERE FROM THREE
                               CLAUS PROCESS SULFUR RECOVERY PLANTS
                                               Iff
             Janes T.  Nance                         Supervising Air Pollution Engineer II
             George Ames                                      Sr. Air Pollution Engineer
                                     SOURCE TESTING SECTION
                                       REPORT NO. C"- 1895
             Eric E.  Lerrike                                                Howard DeVorkin
             Director of Engineering               Supervising Air Pollution Engineer III


                                             ISSUED: *B 2S ^

-------
Test No. C-1895                                     Page 1
                                                    January 10 & 11,  1973

INTRODUCTION

Upon request of Senior Air Pollution Engineer E. E. Larsson of the Refinery
Processing Unit of the Engineering Division,  source tests were performed on
three CVus process sulfur plants.   These plants are operated by the Stand-
ard Oil Company of California and  are located at the El  Segundo' refinery,
324 Vest El Segundo Boulevard, El  Segundo,  California.   These  tests were
performed jointly by personnel from both Standard  Oil and the  J^Lr Pollution
Control District.  The District personnel were J.  T. Nance, G. Ames, and
E. D. Halberg.  Kr. Larsson wag present during the test, and the report of
bis observations is appended along with the sampling results obtained by
Standard Oil.

TEST RESULTS

This report presents the results of three separate tests made  4>n three dif-
ferent sulfur plants, one test per each plant. Over 80  separate determina-
tions were made during the tests and their  summation will not  be attempted
in this paragraph.  The summary of results  for Plants 1, 2, and 5 are shov.71
on pages ^ and 5, 9 and 10, 14 and 15, respectively.

The test results indicate that the incinerator  and  absorber column effectively
reduce the H^S content to nil and  total sulfur compounds from  approximately
1.6-1.8£ to J8-62 ppra as

DESCRIPTION OF PROCESS

The Standard Oil Corapany of California has constructed  three two-stage Claus
process sulfur plants at the El Segundo refinery.  The plants  are alike,
have been constructed adjacent to  each other, and  are operated in parallel.
The plants receive hydrogen sulfide feed gas from  other refinery process unite.
By the Claus process, the sulfur in the hydrogen sulfide feed  gas is converted
to elemental sulfur.  The tail gas from each unit  is incinerated and passed
through a sodium sulfite absorption tower for removal of sulfur dioxide be-
fore venting to the atmosphere.  A schematic drawing of a plant showing sam-
pling locations is shown on page 5*

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

Sampling and analysis of the absorber off-gases by the  Air Pollution Control
District for S02, NOX, and hydrocarbons was performed according to the pro-
cedures of the Source-Testing Manual of the Air Pollution  Control District.
Sampling for HgS was with an impinger train containing  a 'ZnCOj solution.
The I^S -eacts with the ZnCO^ to forra ZnS.   The  solution is  treated with a
strong acid and the liberated H2S is determined by iodometric  titration.

-------
Tust No. C-1895

The sampling trains used for the collection of sulfur oxides and hydrogen
sulfidc are shown on page 22.

The Standard Oil Conpany in processing the acid feed gas samples determined
the 1US iodoractrically, the hydrocarbons by mass Spectrograph, and the 00%
gravinetrically after oxidation of the H2S by chrornate.  The tail gas stream
was sampled with a 10# WaOH solution.  Aliquots were titrated with Afil.'O^ to
determine l^S and precipitated to obtain BaSOjj io determine total sulfur.
The COS an.J. CS2 in the gas stream were determined by GC, using a flame
photometric detector, after the H2S and S02 had been scrubbed out of the
gas by the KaOH train solution.
                                   Approved

-------
Teat No. C-1895
                                                Page  5
                                                1/10-11/73
    Sulfur
    Product

  ClausProcess
  Sulfur Plant
   Incinerator             to Chcm. Pit.


                Absorber


       Sample Locations

       (1)   Std. Oil

       (2)   Std. Oil

       (3)   APCD

 Schematic  Diagram o£ Sulfur  Plant

and Tail-Gas Treating Unit Located

 at Standard Oil Co. of  California

        El  Segundo Refinery

-------
        AIR POLLUTION  CONTROL DlSTRICT>--COUNTY OF LOS  ANGELES
TEST NO._ C-1895
                                                              PAGE.
                                                                  1-10-73
                     SUMMARY:   EMISSIONS TO ATMOSPHERE
                    Standard Oil Co.
NAME OF FIRM 	

LOCATION OF PI AMT   32*f West Fl So/nine!? Ro-jlpvard. Fl S«fmndof CalJjfornl;

TYPE OF npFBATinH   Sulfur Recovery Plant	,	
UNIT TESTED.
                    PI ar>t. 1—
                                         a+.
                                           MEASURED
                                           EMISSIONS
                                                                    ALLOWABLE
                                                                    EMISSIO.M5
RULE 52
             PARTICULATE
             MATTER
RULE 5J.2-1   SULFUR  COMPOUNDS
              AS S02
     53.2-3   "     "      "
     53o      COMBUSTION
              CONTAMINANTS
RULE


RULE 54
             DUST AND FUMES
             C02
                                     62
GRAINS
PER SCF

  BY VOL.
5.07 IbsAr
•^  '    GRAINS PER
   SCF AT 12%'COz
                                     16.0
       LOS. PERMR.
                                              % BY  VOL.
                                GR A I N S
                                PER SCF
                                                               500   pom BY VOL .


                                                               200
                                PER
                     SCF AT 12% C02


                         LOS. PERHR.
              ALDEHYDES AS HCHO
                                             PPM BY VOL.
              HYDROCARBONS
              AS  HEXANE

              NOX AS  N02
                                      Q.7
                                             PPM BY VOLt
                                              PPM  BY  VOL.
              ORGANIC  ACIDS
              AS  ACETIC ACID
       Rule 53.2-2
       Rule 71       CO
GAS FLOW RATE,  SCFM.
GAS TEMPERATURE,  °F.
                                   8100
                                    130
                                              PPM  BY VOL.
                                             ppm hy vol.     10   pnra by vol.
                                              g  bv vol.      0.2  %  by vol.
EFFICIENCY or CONTROL -ouiPMINT,%.
                                                                          I6.SS029

-------
Test No. C-1895
Page 5
1-10-73
                            SULFUR PLANT NO.  1
                  SUMMARY OP CONCENTRATIONS OP CHEMICAL
                     CONSTITUENTS IN GAS STREAKS  (l)


Gas Flow
Rate
H2S
C02
S02
COS (as S02)
CS2 (as S02)
5 vapor (calc.)
H20
NOX
H-C (as C)
CO
Acid Gas
Feed
Std. Oil
195,000 SCFH
67.5 %
31.8 %








Sulfur 'Plant
Tail Gas
Std. Oil

0.9355
15.0 %
0.53 %
0.02^ %
0.0455 %
0.0110 %
-&%



Fotal sulfur compounds as S02f ppm:
(D) + (E) + (F) = 27 + 13 + 22 = (K)
total sulfur compounds as S02f Ib/nr. :
(K) (10-6) (A) (10.i) -- fa
Absorber
Off Gas
Std. Oil APCD
(A) 8100 SCFM
nil (B) <0.10 ppm
16.0 % (C)
27 pprn (D) 27 ppm (2)
13 ppm (E)
22 ppm (F)

14.0* (G)
(H) 0.57 Ib/hr
(I) 0.90 Ib/hr
(J) 0.36 %
(dry)
(K) 62
GO 5.07
    (l) All values are or. wet basis unless indicated.
    (2) Includes any H2S present, which was negligible as shotm under (B)  above,

-------
                   AIR POLLUTION  CONTROL DISTRICT •• COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

TE ST•NO.   C-1895                                                     PAGE _6	

S'AMPLtNG STATiON	Sulfur Unit >'o. ]	DATE   l-T.Q-73
                       SAMPLING TRAIN DATA AND  CALCULATIONS
T J ME

11:50
+ 5
+1C
«15
+20
+25
. +30
+35
+40
+*5
4.50
+55
+60







GAS METER
READ ING
CU. FT.
VM
VAC.
IN. HG
PM
TEMP.
°F
TM
IMPINGCR
TEMP.
op
TI
WaOH Train
(for S02)
5'J.1*8
55.7
57-C
5B.4
59.9
6l.O
620
64.0
65.?
66.6
6H.i
69.4
70.r-7

16. OP
Net





1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

1.0
AVR




rc 60° F




















58
56
58
58
58
57
57
58
58
«tf
56
56

r»7
AVR




VM
PM
T
JM
ZnCO-j Train
(for H2S)
26.50
27.9
29. "5
30.6
32.1
33.2
3*. 5
36.0
37.3
38.7
40.1
*1.5
te.ffi

16. in
Net





1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0'
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0

1 .0
Avt




I
[
TT


TC 60° 'p




















sfi
S6
5l»
«A
S'4
53
S^
«;s
q<;
56
56
**;

cc.
«'- -





1









:-
i
1
•
\



\
 MATERIAL COLLECTED
                                  and HoS
 WEIGHT COLLECTED, CRAMS:
                   SO-
                   H?S

-------
                   AIR POLLL   JN CONTROL DISTRICT --  COUNTY
 TEST NO.
          LOS ANGELES
                 PAGE  .7
 SAMPLING STATION
                              Sxvlfur Unit No.  1
                 HATF   1-10-73
                                     GAS VELOCITY  DATA
TIME
10:25















10:33








POIHT
1
2
~*>
i\
5
6
7
R
9
10
IT
"*9
13
U
IS
16

AlTf







VEL. HEAD
IN. H20
. .15
.17
.1R
.18
.22
.24
.26
.?•>;
,r,
. L-r
.17
TR
OA
'.22
06
.97
.96









TEMP.
°F
131















130








VELOCITY
FT/SEC
27.3
29.0
?0 Q
29.9
33.0
•&.*,
?,s,9
33-8
96.-*
?Q.O
?q.o
•^m
^.n
•7^ 0
^ S
35- Q

32.0







VEL. HEAD
IN H20
.15
.17
iR
.20
.23
.?^
.26
.21
19
.16
.16
.IB
.??
.26
.?«
.24 •









TEMP.
°F

























VELOC ITY
FT/SEC
27.3
2Q.O
?o o
31. 5
33.8
_-*S-9
^S.Q
32.2
?4Jj
9R.9
pR,p
?O.Q
T*.0
•^s.q
^7.^
^t.s

•=51 . 6







VEL .'HEAD
IK: |:H20
.16
.17
HP
.n.Q
."22
.9t
.(97
.23 .,
.1?f
."ifi
Nft
,'19
,?i
.9^
.?7
.?i









TEMP .
oF

























VELOC i TY
FT/SEC
.28.2
?o.o
po o
30.7
33.0
.•Mi.s
^.6
33.8
?fi.^
9R.9
?0 O
•vi y
•^7 0
3S.2
•v>.fi
34.^

31.8







 Static + .19" H20
A.  INDICATED  VELOCITY  (TRAVERSE) FT/SEC.
  31.6
B.  INDICATED  VELOCITY  (REFERENCE  FT.)  FT/SEC.
C.  FLUE FACTOR.A/B	
   1.00
                         I.D.
D. PlTOT  CORRECTION  FACTOR.
                                                       1.00
E. GAS DENSITY CORRECTION FACTOR.
                                                       1.02  (a)
F. GAS PRESSURE  IN STACK,  IN. HG. ABS..

G. GAS PRESS. CORREC. FACTOR, \/29.9/F _
                                                      3Q.15
    .996   8
H. CORRECTED VELOCITY, AxDxExG, FT/SEC.
                  OR BxCxDxExG, FT/SEC.
J. AREA OF FLUE, so. FT.	
                                                      32.4
   4.67
K. AVERAGE  FLUE TEMPERATURE, °F.
L. FLOW  RATE, HxJx60, CFM	
                                                     130
9080
M. FLOW RATE,  (F/29.9)x520xL/(K-M60). SCFM-
                                                    8100
   (a)  Aocumsd value baood  ypon cas  composition info, in permit application.

-------
                 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT     COUNTY,.or  LOS ANGELES
TEST NO.  C-1895

SAMPLING STATION
                                    PAGE
                                                                         8
Sulfur Unit No.  1
PATE 1-10-7T
                    WATER  VAPOR  AND GAS DENSITY CALCULATIONS
   PERCENT  WATER VAPOR  IN GASES
A. GAS PRESSURE AT METER,  IN.  KG  (ABSOLUTE)
                                                        NaOH
                                                        Train
                                                        29.35
B. VAPOR PRESSURE OF WATER  AT  IMPINGES TEMP., IN. HG


C. GAS VOLUME METERED, SCF  	
                                                          .'169
D. WATER VAPOR METERED,  C X B/A, SCF
E. WfcTER VAPOR CONDENSED,  VftPOfl VOLUME, SCF
F. TOTAL WATER VAPOR IN GAS  SAMPLE, 0 + E, SCF

G. TOTAL CAS VOLUME  SAMPLED,  C + E,. SCF 	
H. PER CENT V/ATER VAPOR  IN  CAS SAMPLE, 100 X F/G
                        13.68
                                                          .25
                                                         2.27
                                                         2.S2
                        17.55
                                         Train
                                         29.15
                                          1.81
                                          2.05
    17.55
                                                                        12
   GAS  DENSITY CORRECTION FACTOR
COMPONENT
WATER
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON MONOXICE
OXYGEN
NITROGEN & INERTS


VOLUME PER CENT/100 >

DRY BASIS
DRY DASI5
DRY BASIS
DRY BASIS


MOISTURE CORRECTION
1 - H/100
1.0







: MOL. «nr, =
18.0
44 .0
28.0
32.0
28.2


WE 1 CHT
PEK I.'OLE OF
STACK GAS







J. MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK  GAS
K. DENSITY OF GAS REFERRED  TO AIR = J/20.95  =.

L. GAS DENSITY CORRECTION  FACTOR =   VlToO/'K =.
                                                                                   GOD480

-------
        AIR  POLLUTION CONTROL  DISTRICT-•-COUNFY  Oh  LUb  ANbtLtb
TEST NO.   C-1895
                                                             PAGE  9
                                                             DATE   1-11-73
NAME or FIRM
                    SUMMARY:   EMISSIONS TO  ATMOSPHERE
                      Standard  Oil Co.
LOCATION OF p. A»T

TYPE OF
UNIT TESTED.
                      3^ West E1  Segundo Boulevard, El Scgundo,  California

                      Sulfur Recovery Plant
                      Plant 2-Absorber Outlet
                                           MEASURED
                                           EMISSIONS
                                                                    ALLOWABLE
                                                                    EMISSIONS
RULE 52
              PARTICIPATE
              MATTER
RULE 53-2-1   SULFUR COMPOUNDS
              AS S02
     53.2-3  "      "       "
RULE 53s     COMBUSTION
              CONTAMINANTS
RULE 54
              DUST  AND FUMES
              C02
      . GRAINS
       PER SCF


       ppmaY VOL.
 2.0U  Ibs/hr
	 GRAINS PER
    SCF AT 12% C02

	 LBS.PERHR.
                                     16.0    % BY VOL.
GR AiN s
PER SCF
                                                               500   ppmnv VOL.


                                                               200   Ibs/hr
                                                              	 GRAINS PER
                                                                  SCF AT 12% C02

                                                              	 LBS.PERHR.
              ALDEHYDES AS HCHO
                                             PPM BY VOL.
              HYDROCARBONS
              AS HEXANE
              NOX AS
                                             PPM BY VOL,
                                             PPM BY VOL.
              ORGANIC  ACIDS
              AS  ACETIC  ACID
        Rule 53.2-2


        Rule 71     CO
GAS FLOW RATE, SCFM.
GAS TEMPERATURE,  F.
                                    .110.
                                             PPM BY VOL.
                                             prni by vol.    10    pran by vol.
                                       0.2     %  by vol.


                                    5300
                       0.2   % by vol.
EFFICIENCY OF CONTROL EOUIPMINT,%.
                                                                          16-55029

-------
                JfUijLAJ J JLWI1 UVK
Test No. C-1G95
                            SULPUR PLANT NO. 2
                  SUM-WHY OP COrfCEWRATIOMS OP CHEMICAL
                     CONSTITUENTS IN GAS STREAMS (l)
Page 10
1-11-73


Gas Flow
Rate
H2S
C02
S02
COS (as S02)
CS2 (as S02)
5 vapor (calc.)
H20
NOX
H-C (as C)
CO
Acid Gas
Feed
Std. Oil
129,000 SCFH
67O %
32.42








Sulfur Plant
Tail Gas
Std. Oil

0.91 %
1^.0 %
0.70 %
0.0260 %
0.0525 %
0.0100 %
32.0*



total sulfur compounds as SOp, ppra:
(D) + (E) + (F) = 33 + 1 ? * «= 
Dotal sulfur compounds as S02, lb/hr.:
(K) (10-6) (A) (10.1)
Absorber
Off Gas
Std. Oil APCD
(A) 5>00 SCFM
nil (B) <0.4 ppra
16.0 % (c)
35 pp-n (D) 25 ppra (2)
1 ppm (E)
\ ppra (P)

10.0 ^ (G)
(H) 0.59 IbA-r
(1) O.'llJ IbAr
(J) 0.2 ^
(dry)
(K) 33
(L) 2.04
    (l) All values  are on wet basis unless noted.
    (2) Includes any KgS  present, which was negligible as  shown under (B) above.

-------
TEST NO.
SAMPLING STATION
                 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL  DISTRICT  -• COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

                	                                              PACE  11

                                          Acid Vs. ?	DATE  1-1
                       SAMPLING TRAIN DATA AND  CALCULATIONS
TIME

10:25
+ 5
+10
+15
+20
+25
. +30
+35
+'lO
+^5
•f50
+55
±Pin







GAS METER
READING
CU. FT.
VM
VAC.
IN. KG
PM
TEMP.
°F
TH
IMP INCEH
TEMP .
OF
TI
NaOH Train
39-02
'10.7
*2.3
43.9
45.5
'}?•!
A8.7
50. '»
51. B
511!.?
r>5.?
56.8
r^ hP

10 Jifi
TT°*





1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.3
1.?
1.?
1.^
1.3
1 •*
'
1 ,9
Avr




To
60' P.
'


















58
58
57
58
53
57
56
55
^
55
56
s6

^7
AVP




VM

W.12
'15.7
'J7.-5
Ii8.9
50. li
51.9
53-3
5*1.0
56. R
^.?
60.1
61.8
6^. si

19 19
Net




PM
ZnC03

1.2
1.-1
1.1
Ul
l.'f
l.'t
1.6
1.8
i.R
1.8
i.R
i.R

T (J
Av/r




T
M
TT

Train
To '-
60° P.-

.
•
*















. ^6
•*
5'!
55
56
55
C»l
ms
PI,
NT
t;Ji
rJi

55
/.»-
























 MATERIAL COLLECTED
 WEIGHT COLLECTED, GRAMS:
                SO.
                           0.055
 A. TOTAL WEIGHT
  B. STACK GAS FLOW RATE, SCFM
C. WATER VAPOR CONDENSED,  LIQUID  VOLUME, ML 	

D. WATER VAPOR CONDENSED,  VAPOR VOLUME, 0.0464 x C, SCF,
E. GAS VOLUME METERED. '\7 . 4xVMX (PA-PM) /I 4604TH) . SCT

F. TOTAL GAS VOLUME  s<
G. MATERIAL CONCENTRATION,  15.43  x  A/F, GRAINS/SCF.
   Material concentration,          .    ppm	
H. MATFRIAL FLO* RATE,  0.00857  x  D  x G, LDS/HR 	
SAMKI ING POINT

SAMPLING NOZZLE
        I.D.. MM
ATMO5. PRESSURE,
      P., IN. HG
                                                                     1.76
            1.53
                                                                    18.98
                                                                              18. *6
                                                                    20.7'i
           J9.99
                                                                     O.O-'Q
                                                                               J.0002
                                                                    25
                                                                     JLJ
                                                                                R.\  60D-18-1

-------
                   AIR POLLU   N  CONTROL DISTH1CT ••  COUNTY
 TEST NO.
             C-1895
 SAMPLING STATION
                           ytgndard-Sulftir Unit Tio. 2
                                                                LOS  ANGELES

                                                                       PAGE

                                                               	  DATE
                                      GAS  VELOCITY  DATA
TIME
W>










,













POIMT
1
2
•5
4
5
6
7
R
n
> •*-• •
10
11
TO
T».
IJi
1^
-Ifi

f.vf







VEL. HEAD
IN. H20
.M
.03
.03
.OR
.10
.10
.09
ofi
.o!i
-°7
.07
OS
\n
.19
.T*
,11









TEMP .
°F
no
























VELOC ITY
FT/SEC
J5-5
1Q.6
IP. 6
10 fi
21.0
?1 °
20.8
TO, ft
v< R
1R /!
TR It
10 6
. .?! ..3 —
5t n
ps.n
9-^ 0

pn.?







VEL. HEAD
i« U20
.Ofi
,r>7
.0^
n?
.0^
in
.10
^
.tX
nfi
.07
-07
-..10
.i^>
.IP
-T"









TEMP .
°F

























VELOC ITY
FT/SEC
l«S.r3
iR.'t
10^
38.':
IQ.rt
OT rj
21.9
T?.f»
17,0
10.^
iRJv
18. •>!
— 21.9
5't.n
?'!.0
?5.n

?n.i







VEL.:HEAO
IN. :H20
.05
.07
Aq
...49...
.no
10
.10
.nR
nh
.ofi
.hft
bs-
.00
.11
.1'.
.1?









TEMP .
°F

























VELOCITY
FT/SEC
.37.0
IR.I.
10 A;
IfJ *C
9.T R
IT o
21 !§
IP. 8
l^.R
17.0
TO. 6
10 £ .
?n.8
2^.0
?=>.o
P'l.O

20.1




•
;

 Static tt.02"H20 (pulsating)
A.  INDICATED  VELOCITY  (TRAVERSE)  FT/SEC-
B. INDICATED VELOCITY {R'EFCRENCL PT.J  FT/SEC.
C. FLUE FACTOR, .
                                                    1.00
D. PlTOT  CORRECTION  FACTOR.
                                                    1.00
E. GAS DENSITY CORRECTION  FACTOR.
                                                    1.O2  fa)
F. GAS PRESSURE  IN STACK.  IN.  IIG.  ADS..
G.
                                                   ^50.
                                                      .99-5
H. CortiiecTEo  VELOCITY,  AxOxExG,  FT/SEC.

                   OR  OxCxOxExG.  FT/SEC ,

J. AflLA  OF  FLUE,  SO.  FT.	
                                                   20.1*
K.  AVFRfcGE  FLUE  TEMPERATURE,  °F.

L.  TLOV.'  RATE,  HxJxGO.  CFM	
                                                  110
M. FLOW RATC,  (F/P9.9)x520xL/(K+460).  SCFM.
  (a) Asr.iunecl value ba:>:c! upon cac composition i-ifo. in permit application.
                                                                                     R-»  60

-------
                 AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT --  COUNTY OF LOS ANGCLES
TEST NO.  C-1893

SAMPLING STATION
                                                                  PAGE_li.
                           Sulfur Unit Ko.  2
                                                                  OATF  1-10-7^
                    WATER VAPOR AND  GAS DENSITY  CALCULATIONS

   PERCENT WATER VAPOR IN GASES
A. GAS PRESSURE  AT  METER,  IK. HG (ABSOLUTE)
B. VAPOR PRESSURE  OF  WATER AT IMMNGER TEMP.,  IN.


C. GAS VOLUME  METERED, SCF 	
D. V/ATER VAPOR  METEREO, C X B/A, SCF
E. V/ATER VAPOR  CONDENSED, VAPOR VOLUME,  SCF
F. TOTAL WATER VAPOR IN  GAS  SAMPLE, D + E, SCF

•G. TOTAL GAS VOLUME SAMPLED, C + E, SCF 	
H. PER CENT WATER  VAPOR  IN GAS SAMPLE, 100 X F/G
                                                          KaOH
                                                          Train
                                                          18. Q8
                                                           3.76
                                                           2.07
                                                          20.7^
                                                          10.0
                                                                          ZnCO
                                                                          Train

                                                                          28.7S
                                                                          18.
                                                                           l.fli
                                                                           Q.I
   GAS  DENSITY CORRCCTION  FACTOR
COMPONENT
WATER
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARDON MONOXIDE
OXYGEN
NITROGEN A INERTS


VOLUME PER CCWT/IOO >

CRY BASIS
DRY BASIS
DRY BASIS
DRY BASIS


MOISTURE CORRECT i OK ,
1 - H/100
1.0







C KML. WT. =
18.0
t4.0
28.0
32.0
28.2


WEIGHT
PER MOLE OF
STACK GA.S







J. MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF STACK GAS
K. DENSITY OF GAS REFERRED  TO  AIR = J/28.95  -.


L. GAS DENSITY CORRCCTION FACTOR =   A/1 .00/K =.
                                                                                  600460

-------
        AIR  POLLUTION  CONTROL Dl STK Id - - -CUUIM IY ut-  LUS
TEST MO-  C-1895
                                                PAGE.
                    SUMMARY:   EMISSIONS  TO ATMOSPHERE
NAME OF FIRM
LOCATION OF PLANT.

TYPE OF OPERATION.
                                  il  Co.
              West El SoKundo Boulevard, El Senundo.  California

          Sulfur Recovery Unit	
UNIT TESTED.
                        Plant VAbRorhnr Outlet
                                           MEASURED
                                           EMISSIONS
                                                       ALLOWABLE
                                                       EMISSIONS
RULE 52
PARTICULATE
MATTER
RULE 5J.2-1   SULFUR  COMPOUNDS
              AS  S02
     53.2-3   "
RULE MB      C
              C

RULE 54       DUST  AND FUMES
        II       II
COMBUSTION
CONTAMINANTS
GRAINS
    SCF
                             -PP.T)
                                                BY  VOL.
                         1.81
                                GRAINS PER
                            SCF AT 12% C02

                                LBS.PERHR.
                                                -00
                                                         GRAINS
                                                         PER SCF

                                                              VOL.
                 200
                         GRAINS PER
                     SCF AT 12% C02

                         LBS. PERHR.
              C02
                                      10.n    % OY VOL.
              ALDEHYDES  AS HCHO
                                              PPM BY VOL.
              HYDROCARBONS
              AS HEXANE
              NOX AS
                                PPM BY VOL,
                                              PPM BY VOL.
              ORGANIC  ACIDS
              AS ACETIC  ACID
        Rule 53.2-2_H2S_
        Rule 71	CO
                                PPM BY VOL.
                                 ppm V>y
               10    pp-n by vol.
                         0.057    £  hv vol..    0.2  5?   by vol.
GAS FLOW RATE, SCFM.
GAS TEMPERATURE, °F
 EFFICIENCY OF CONTROL EQUIPMENT,?..
                                                                           16-55029

-------
Test Ho. C-1895
     15
1-11-73
                            SULFUR FIJOT NO. 3
                  SUMMARY OP CO?rCH3TRATIONS OK C1EUCAL
                     CONSTITUENTS IN GAS ST?£AI-'3 (l)



Gas Plow
Hate
H2S
C02
S02
COS (as S02)
CS2 (as S02)
S \'apor (calc.)
H20
NOX
H-C (as C)
CO
Acid Gas
Peed
Std. Oil
125,000 SCFH
62.1 %
37-'' %








Sulfur Plant
Tail Gas
Std. Oil

O.'JO %
18.0 %
1.30*
0.0026 %
0.0010 %
0.0133 %
42.0 Ji



Total sulfur cofiDOunds as SOp, ppm:
(D) + (E) + (F) = 3§ +<1 ? 2 = IK)
Total sulfur compounds as SO?, lbs/hr.
(K) (10-6) (A) (10.1)
Absorber
Off Gas
Std. Oil APCD
(A) 4500 SCFT'i
nil (B) 1.4 ppm
19-0 % (C)
38 pp-n (D) 28 ppm (2)
<1 ppra (E)
2 ppra (P)

12.0 JS (G)
(H) 0.^6 IbAf
(I) 0.21 IbAr
(J) 0.067 2
(dry)
(K) '!0
(L) l.Bl
   (l)  All values are on ucb basis unless noted.
   (2)  Includes  any H2S present, ijhich \ias 1.4  ppm as shoun under (D) above.

-------
                   AIR POLLUTION  CONTROL  DISTRICT  •- COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
TEST NO.
           C-08T;
SAMPLING STATION
                           Sulfur Unit Ho.
                       SAMPLING TRAIN DATA AND CALCULATIONS
                                                                   PAGE	16



                                                                  .DATE
                                                                         1-11-71
TIME

1:50
+ 5
+10
+15
+?0
*25
«-30
+35
*'!0
J^
• irO •
4«^
. i/O .







GAS MLTER
READING
CU. FT.
VM
VAC.
IN. HC
PM
TEMP.
°F
TH
IMPINGE ii
TEMP .
OF
Ti
KaOH
6<^9
66.8
68.3
69-7
71.2
7?. 6
7!i.o
75- ''
76.8
7R.9
70. 1
Rl.l
ftO r4

17.17
Not





1.0
.9
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
i.n
_. T.I

i.O
Av.t




60° P.
Tc



















68
66
66
65
64
65
6'i
6s
fiK
6r;
fiU
#i

fis
y\rrx




vt^
^M
TM
^T

2nCO_
60.60
6T. 9
63.3
6ii.6
66.1
67.5
6B.8
70.2
71. S
7^,n
7J[ V,
7^.7
77,10

l^.f-,0
Ik-t





1.0
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.2
1.?
1.2
I.'*
1 ."
1.1
1 .7

l.P
Avr




60° P.
Tc



















64
53
56
53
56
56
•#
So
r,fi
c,/;
r,r.
r.l,

^.7
/.vfr













•










 MATERIAL COLLECTED
                             SO,, and
 WEIGHT COLLECTED, GRAMS:
                 -fifi.
                            o.ntu
                                           o.rvn
 A. TOTAL WEIGHT
                                                                   SAMPLING POINT    ^


                                                                   SAMPLING NOZZLE  ,• __
                                                                           I.D.,  I.IM  0.35

                                                                   ATMOS.. PRESSURE,,
  B. STACK GAS FLOW RATE,  sent
 C. WATER VAPOR CONDENSED, LIQUID
                                         ML
                                                               S02
                                                               '15
D. WATER VAPOR COHDENSEO,  VAPOR  VOLUME,  0.0464  x  c,  SCF



F.. GAS VOLUME METERED, "IV . -SxVMX (P A-PM> / ( 4604TM) .  SCF 	


F. TOTAL CAS VOLUME  SAMPLED,  D + E,  SCF	
                                                                2.09
                                                                               3.76
                                                               16.80
                                                               18.90
                                                                              17.
G. MATERIAL CONCENTIMTION,  15.43  x  A/F,  GHAIKS/SCF.

   Material concentration,              -ppm

II. MATERIAL tLOW RATE, 0.00057  x  B  x  G,  LDS/MR
                                                               ?8
                                                                i  '-ft
                                                                                R. 1

-------
  TEST  NO.   C-1805




  SAMPLING  STATION .
AIR POLLLT   ,N CONTROL DISTRICT •• COUNTY    LOS ANGELES




	                                               PAGE  17



         	Standard-Sulfur Acid No.'__?	 DATE  1-11-73
                                     GAS VELOCITY  DATA
TIME
12:55










-













POINT
1
?.
•*,
'k '
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
lli
IS
16

AVK







VEL . HEAD
IN. H20
.04 '
.06
.Ofi
.06
.07
.08
.07
.06
.03
.OS
^n^ ._.
.06
.07
,no
.no
-.OR









TEMP.
°F
120
























VELOCITY
FT/SEC
13.9
37.1
17. 1
17.3.
18.5
2Q.7
18.5
^ 7-^-1-
l?.l '
1ST
- 15-7
17.'1
38. *
.21.0, .
?1.0
19-7 •

17,?







VEL. HEAD
IN H20
.0^;
.. .06
0^
.06
.07
.08
.07
-Tns
.nfi
.OR
O1^
'n^
.07
no
.nfl
.OR









TEMP.
°F
130
























VELOCITY
FT/SEC
13.9 •
17.1 .
.,17.3. ,.
17.1
18. R
10.7
18.5.
15 7
n.o
I* 7
15 ^
I7 l
_iai__
_?T n
10.7
10.7

. .1.7 Jt ...







VEL. HEAD
IN: 'H20
.M
.hfi
.b<5
.1)6.
-.hfi
-nfi
-07
n£
,nli
n«
U$
•r -J
n<
.07
nR
-OR
• n7









TEMP.
°F
120










VELOCITV
FT/SEC
n.9
17.1
n7 1
IV. 1
17.1
TO. 7
18.^
17 T
TH 0
">7, T
1-7 I
1 ITT













18.S
10 7
r IP.? .
18.^

_ 17. e;







Static5r.02"H 0 (fluctuates)
                                                   17.5
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
J.
K.
L.
M.
INDICATED VELOCITY (REFERENCE PT.) FT/SEC
FIIIF rirrnp.A/R
PlTOT CORRECTION FACTOR.
GAS DENSITY CORRECTION FACTOR
GAS PBFSSHRF, 1^ STACK, 1". n
120
4960
4500
                                                                        291,, I.D.
                                                                                   ft- 1   60048
   (a)  Acsiunert value  based upon G^S composition info, in permit application.

-------
                  AIR POLLT  'ON CONTROL DISTRICT -•  COUNTY/ r LOS ANGELES
 TEST NO.  C-1893

 SAMPLING  STATION
                                          PAGE.
                                                18
Sulfur Unit No.
DATE 1-11-7?
                     WATER VAPOR AND  GAS DENSITY  CALCULATIONS
   PERCENT WATER VAPOR IN GASES
 A.  GAS PRESSURE AT METER, IN. HC (ABSOLUTE)
                               . NaOH
                                Train

                                29^25
 B. VAPOR PRESSURE OF WATER AT IMPINGER  TEMP.,  IN. HG
                                                           .622
G.. TOTAL CAS VOLUME SAMPLED,  C + E,  SCF
H. PER CEKT WATER VAPOR JN GAS SAMPLE*.100 X F/G
                                                         16.80
                                                         18.89
                                n.o
    ZnCO
    Train
    2Q.OS
                                                 .469
P WATFR VAPOR MFTFRFP, C X R/A, ^CF 	
E'. WATFR VAPOR CONOFNSFP,. VAPOR vm HMF, SCF 	 _..,
F. TOTAL WATER VAPOR IN GAS SAMPLE, D + E, SCF
.36
2.09
' j».*i
.26
1.76 -
2.0?
                                               17.8Q
                                                                        11.-
   GAS DENSITY CORRECTION FACTOR
COMPONENT
WATER
CARBON DIOXIDE
CARBON MONOXIDE
OXYGEN
NITROGEN ft INERTS


VOLUME PER CENT/100 >

PRY BASIS
DRY BASIS
DRY BASIS
DRY BASIS


MOISTURE CORRECTION
1 -H/100
1.0



•


: MOL. WT. :
18.0
44.0
28.0
32.0
28.2


V/E 1 GHT
: PER MOLE OF
STACK GAS

1
;




J. MOLECULAR WEIGHT OF  STACK  GAS
K. DENSITY OF GAS REFERRED  TO  AIR = J/28.95  =.

L. GAS DENSITY CORRECTION  FACTOR =   \f\ .00/K =.
                                                                                 . 600^00

-------
              AIR >'OLLUTI   COJ1THOL DISTRICT - COUNTY OF

Test No.    C-1G93
RESULTS OF AK'vLYS-vS
        FOH
 ORGANIC
                              AIICLLES
                                      Page   19
                                      Date   1-10-73
                                             1-11-73

TEST STATION:
COHCSNTRATims, PM JJHY BASIS
Sample 1:
2:
3:
li:
IV. AVERAGE CO:;CM., PFM (DRY)
D. Water vapor in gases, vol. %
C. Stack gas flow ratp, scfkn
D. Conversion factor
E. AVERAGE CO! CM., PR! (ViET),
A(l - 0.013)
F. AVG. Cffi.'CN., GRADiS/SCF (lilT),
D x E
G. now Rvre, rourins KR HOUR,
0.00057 x C x F
H. CO.iTHOI, L'FFICJUOCr, J{
onfi.unc
cofipoiiins
AS
CARBON
S UWIT 1
ABSORBER
OUTLET
40
' 93
53

64
11.7
8100
0.000222
57
0.013
0.90

ORGANIC
COMPOUNDS
AS
CARBON
s mrrp S
ABSORUCR
OUTT.ET
61
5^
29

1)8
9.1
5200
0.000222
M
0.0097
0.'('!
•
ORGANIC
COi-TOUJiDS
AS
• CARBON
S IPJTT ?
ABS03ti3FP,
OU7TET
37
24
24

28
11.3
'iyso
0.000222
25
0.0035
0.21

                                      600646

-------
              AIR FOLLUTIp" CONTROL DISTRICT - COUNTY OF }"" ANGELES
Tcit Mo.  C-1895
                              RESULTS OF AKILYS-S
                                      fOH
                                 NITROGHJ OXIDES
Page  ?o
flato  1-10-73
      1-11-73

TEST SI'VTira:
CO'-JCENTR VFT'iMS, Pftt D;«Y mSIS
Swnple 1:
2:
3:
Ii:
4. AVliRAGE COyCM., PPM (nRY)
13. Water vapor an E^SCS, vol. %
C. Stack cas flo" ral«, pcfm
D. Conversion factor
E. AVERAGE CQ!C\'., PPM (\ET),
A(l - 0.01B)
F. AVG. CO\'CH., GRM>:S/SCF (LIT)
D x E
G. FLOU R.'iT'o, !X)IJ!PS KTH HOiJR,
0.00057 x C X F
I!. COM1:*!, L'lTJCli^CY, ^
NTTKOOEW
OXIDSS
AS
NITROGEN
DIOXID3
S 1JJJIT 1
ABSORBSR
OUTLET

11
9
12

11
11.7
8100
0.0008*19
9.7
0.0082
0.57

NITROGEN
OXIECS
AS
in-rnooa-i
DIOXIDE
S UHIT ?
ABSOT3ER
oim.'jrr

19
13
17

16
9.1
5'.}00
o.ooo3'i9
15
0.013
0.59

NITKOCV!
OXIDL5
AS
MITRaV.il
DIOXIHS
S UN'TT "=5
ADSORBER
OUTI.ET

15
21
13

16
n.3
'1500
Cvoooaii?
11
0.032
0.^6

                                                                   .6on6lj6

-------
     APPENDIX  I

SOURCE TEST RESULTS
SULFURIC ACID PLANT

-------
                     /-
                                                     /-
                                                     V
.134 SOUTH SAN PEORO STREET. LOS ANGELES.  CALIF. 90013 - ,\WDISON V-47H / COUNTY  OF LOS ANGELES
                                                                      „      M       /• s _
                                 TESTS
                             CONDUCTED AT

                        STANDARD OIL CO.,  V.O.I.
                         VEST EL SEGUKDO  EOULE\'ABD
                        EL SEGUNDO, CALIFORNIA
                                   ON

                       MARCH 21 & APRIL 3,  1973
                                 REPORT
                                 ON THE

              EMISSIONS TO THE ATMOSPHERE OP SULFURIC ACID,
       SULFUR THIOXIDE & SULFTJH DIOXIDE FROl-i A SULFURIC ACID PLANT
Jasss 'J. Nance                           Supervising Air Pollution Engineer II
George Ames                                      Senior Air Pollution Engineer
                         SOORCE TESTING SECTION
                           REPORT NO. C - 1920
Eric E. Lealte                                                  Howard DsVorkin
Director of Engineering                 Supervising Air Pollution Engineer III
                                 ISSUED:-.,,   .	,
                                         *•••»« •. i  •.«.'.«)

-------
            AIR POLLUTION COM'l'KUl. Liiimuoi - VAAHIJ.A  \JL

Test No. C-1920


INTRODUCTION

Upon request of the Refinery Unit of the Engineering Division,  a source test
was performed on a sulfuric acid plant to determine  the  emissions to the ataios-
phere of sulfuric acid, sulfur trioxide and dioxide, and oxides of nitrogen.
Ohis plant is located at the Standard Oil Refinery complex,  J24 West El Segundo
Boulevard, El Segundo, California.  Mr. Robert Ray,  APC  Coordinator of Standard
Oil, assisted in making the test arrangements.  Source Testing  personnel Messrs.
J.T. Nance, E.D, Halberg and G. Ames performed the sampling operations.  Senior
Air Pollution Engineer K. Lawrence, who initiated the request,  was present dur-
ing the test.  He obtained data, on equipment operation,  which is included in
his observations attached to this report.

TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Ofce now rate of gases to the atmosphere was l6,'JOO scfm, containing 120 pom of
SOo by volume.  Mass emission rate of sulfur compounds was 20.1 Ibs/nr.  No sul-
furic acid was found in the samples and any SOj, if present, was below the de-
tectable limits.

On March 21, 1973, a traverse was made with the intention of testing shortly
thereafter; but, due to an upset condition, the test had to be  postponed.  On
the morning of April ^, one leg of the traverse was rerun.  It was repeated in
tiie afternoon prior to the testing period, c.» Source-Testing personnel were id-
formed that a alight upward change in the  feed rate had taken place.  This did
not seem to affect the flow rate of the gases at the sampling point, according
to the traverse measurements.

The data used on the summary (emission to  atmosphere) sheet are from the sam-
pling train with the larger total gas volume sampled, vhich would be expected
to give more reliable  results.  The values for S02 of 107 and 120 ppm  from  the
two trains agree quite well within experimental error and values for SO^  and in
both cases were below  the detectable limits.

SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

Gases were withdrawn  from the  stack and passed through  duplicate sampling trains,
differing only in the  equipment being used for absorption of SO-j.  Train 1  used
one SO-z absorber and  filter tube, as shown on page 86 of Public Health Service
Publication No. 999-AP-l?, whil* Train 2  used two Smith-Greenberg irapingers.  A
complete description  of both trains is on page 12 of this report.

Sulfuric  acid was removed by the Whatman  thimble preceding the  iinpingers  (ab-
sorber) which contained 8o#  isopropyl  alcohol for absorbing SO^.  She  1PA im-
pin^ers were  followed by impin/sers  containing NaOH  to collect     SOg.

-------

Teal; No. C-1920                                                       Page 2

Analysis for SO-, and S02 was done by the analytical  laboratory by the barium
chloride gravimetric procedure.   Sulfuric acid was determined by & standard acid-
base titration.

Samples for oxides for nitrogen were taken with two-liter evacuated flasks con-
taining a sulfuric acid-hydrogen peroxide absorbing  solution and analyzed by the
phenoldisulfonic acid procedure.

A Ifylai* bag was filled with the gases which were then transferred to two-liter
evacuated flasks for a TCA analysis for CO, C02 and  CH^.   A sample from the bag
was also analyzed with, a conventional Orsat apparatus.

The flow rate of the gases at the sampling station was determined by a standard
pitot tube traverse.
                                   Approved

-------
Test No. C-1920
                                                                         .
                                                                      >  . -73
                                                                      *-;-.-3
                   SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM SHOWING SAMPLING

            LOCATION AT STANDARD OIL CO. SULFURIC ACID PLANT
                                                                   To
                                                               Atmosphere
                                          iampling Station
                             Walkway-Bridge
        IPinaT. Absorber with
        Mist Eliminator Section
Stack

-------
         AIR  POLLUT I 0V CONTROL D I STR I CT---COUNTYx-^F LOS  ANGELES
 TEST NQ.  C-1920
                                                              PAGE.
                                                               DATEjh2=IL
 NAME OF
                     SUMMARY:   EMISSIONS TO  ATMOSPHERE
               Standard Oil Co. of California, V.O.I.
 LOCATION OF »- *MT  32-* Vest El Seguado Boulevard
 TYPE  OF  OPERATION,
                    Manufacture of sulfuric acid
 UNIT TESTED.
                    Sulfur acid plant
RULE NO.
                                            MEASURED
                                            EMISSIONS
                                ALLOWABLE
                                EMISSIONS
5Z


53


53

54


58.68.'!


67

67

68


71
              PARTICIPATE
              MATTER

               SULFUR  COMPOUNDS
               AS SO;

              S-COMPS. AS S02

               SOLID PARTICULATE
               MATTER

              COMBUSTION
              CONTAMINANTS

              COMBUST. CONTAMS.

               NOX AS N02

              NOX AS  NOz


              CARBON MONOXIDE
120
GRAINS
PER SCF

PPM BY VOL.
 20.1    LB.  PER MR.


	  LB.  PER HR.
         CHAINS  PER
    _
     SCF AT  12%
         LB. PER HR.

         LB.  PER HR.


         PPM BY VOL.

         AT 3% 02


         • % BY VOL.
GR A t Ns
PER SCF

 FPK BY VOL
                  200     Lo.  PER HR.

                          Ln.  PER "HR.
                     	GRAINS  PER
                     SCF AT  12%  C02


                     	  LO. PER HR.

                          LB. PER HR.
   NOTES*    ALL  RESULTS ON DRY  (OR EQUIVALENT) BASIS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED
                          PPM BY VOL.

                          AT i% 02

                          % BY VOL.
                                                                            55D29 fl-1

-------
               AIR POLLUTION  CONTROL DISTRICT  - COUNTY  OF LOS ANGELES
TEST N0.C-1920	          ........... ~>-  „.,-.  ...^ „,-,•»,,, -rr-               PAGE _5_
                               SUMMARY OF  DATA  AND RESULTS
 TEST SITE,  EQUIPMENT, AND TEST CONDITIONS:
      J.  NAME OF FIRM	Standard Oil Co.  of California,  W.O.I.
                                Sulfuric acid nlant
      2.  BASIC EQUIPMENT
      3,  CONTROL EOUIPMENT
      4,  EQUIPMENT TESTED
                               Brink's mist eliminator
                               Sulfuric acid olant
      5.  PROCESS WEIGHT, LBS PER HOUR
      6.  TESTING CONDITION
                                See engineers observation report
      7.  SAMPLING LOCAT.ION:
                                                       Duct to Stack
GAS FLOW AND ANALYSIS:
     8, GAS TEMPERATURE,
     9. GAS VELOCITY,
     0. CAS FLOW RATE
                                                             160

F, $f!Fu ( WET)
. SCFM (DRY}r
;, VOL %t DRY BASt S:

16400
5.8
7.9
ununv IDF •
N
0.0 (nor.e detected by TCA)
86.3
              CARBON
              OXYGEN
              CARBON
              NITROGEN
     12. GAS ANALYSIS. VOL %. WET BASIS:
              WATER VAPOR 	
              CAREON DIOXIDE
              OXYGEN 	
              CARGON MONOXIDE
              NITROGEN 	
AIR CONTAMINANTS MEASURED:
    13-. MATERIAL COLLECTED
                                     SO^ & SOp
                                      HgSOJj
                                             Train I
                                              SO-,
                                                             '  HpSOk
Train 2
 SO,
14.  TOTAL GAS
15.  .*T.JGHT COLLECTED, GRAMS _
16.  MATERIAL CONCENTRATION:
         GRAINS PER SCF 
-------
                  AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT •- COUNTY OF. LOS ANGEL,
TEST NO.  C-1920


SAUPL I NG STAT I ON    Duct to Stack
                                                                    PAGE
                                                                    HATP
                       SAMPLING  TRAIN DATA AND  CALCULATIONS  (DRY BASIS)
TIME

13:30
+ S
10
15
20
25
30
' 35
40
45
_5o
55
60

fin ni"
pr>+




GAS ML rm
READ ING
CU. FT.
VM
VAC.
IN . HG
PM
MP I NCCR
TEMP.
°F
Tj
Train I
4.77
5.0
5.2
5.5
5.6
5.8
6.1
6.4
6.6
\ 6.8
7.1
7.3
7.61
1
? Pk
no-H





4.8
4.8
4.8
5.0
5-3
5.9
5.9
5.9
5-9
5-9
5-9
5.9


-------
                       rui_l_U i
TEST
          C-1920
                                                                     PAGE _7_
SAMPLING STATION
                       Duct to Stack
                                                                    , DATE,
                        SAMPLING  TRAIN  DATA AND  CALCULATIONS  (DRY BASIS)
TIME

13:30
+5
10
15
20
25
30
35 •
40
45
50
55
60

£O TTvin
Y-.o-h




GAS ML ILK
READING
CU. FT.
VM
VAC.
IN. HG
PM
IMPINGER
TEMP.
°F
TI
Train 2
44.46
45.6
47.2
48.6
50.1
51. 3
53-1
54.3
55.7
57.3
58.9
60.3
61.65

17.10
, nnt, „,





1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.7
1.8
1.7
1.7

1-7
avc





62
60
62
60
60
60
60
60
60
58
58
56

fin
av£




Temp
Thimble
°P.
TTH







74
77
77
77
78
78
77
76
76
75
74
74

7*
av£

































































































1!






 MATERIAL mi i mm
                           t SQ-n & SO? (by impingera)
 WEIGHT  COLLECTED,  GRAMS:
  Thimble
                                  ND
 . IPA portion of igrpinger train_
                                         <0.0005
  MaOH portion of
                         >r T.Tvri-n
0.149
  A. TOTAL  WEIGHT.GRAMS
                                         C0.0005    O.l49
  6.  STACK GAS FLOW RATE,  SCFM(DRY).


                 AT METER. P.~-PU.  IN
  D.  VAPOR PRESSURE OF WATER AT IMP. TEMP..  IN. HG
  E.  GAS VOLUME  METEREO,   \'M  X C/29.9.  SCF
  F.
           GAS VOLUME
  G.  MATERIAL CO-NCN. .  l5.43xA/F.  GRAiNs/scF(Df
-------
                  AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT •- COUNIY OF LOS ANGELES
TEST NO.  E-
                                                                     PAGE   8
SAMPLING STATION
                     Duct to Stack
DATE  *-V73
                WATER VAPOR, DRY GAS FLOW RATE. AND GAS DENSITY CALCULATIONS
   PERCENT WATER VAPOR IN GASES
A. GAS 'PRESSURE AT  METER* PA _ PM. IN.  He ABS.
B. VAPOR PRESSURE  OF  WATER  AT  IMP.  TEMP.. IN. HG

C. GAS VOLUME METERED, VM X A/29.9.  SCF	

t. WATER VAPOR METERED,  C x B/A,  SCF 	
E. WATER VAPOR CONDENSED. LIQUID VOL.. ML
F. WATER VAPOR CONO.. VAPOR VOL..  0.0464 x E.  SCF .

G.  TOTAL WATER VAPOR IN GAS  SAMPLE,  D + F. SCF

H,  TOTAL GAS VOLUME SAMPLED, C  +  F.  SCF 	
 J..  PER CENJ WATER VAPOR  IN  GAS  SAMPLE*  100 X G/H

    DRY GAS FLOW RATE
K. GAS FLOA RATC.  SCFM (WET)
L. GAS FLOW RATE. K(UJ/100).  SCFM (DRY) .

   GAS DENSITY CORRECTION  FACTOR
COMPONENT
WATCH
i
C»REON DIOXIDE
OXYGEN
CARBON MONOXIDE
NITROGEN ft INERTS

TOTAL
MOLECULAR WEIGHT
VOL. VIOO
(DRY)
>at Analysis
              0.99'
            60043

-------
               AIR  POLLITJO:   CONTTOL  DISTRICT  -  COUNTY OF

Test No.   C-1920
                                 RESULTS OF ANALYSES
                                        FOR
                                       & C02 (a)
ANGELES

      Page!.

      Date  1
OOMPONE.NT:
TEST STATION
CONCENTRATIONS. PPM DRY BASIS
Sample 1:
2:
3:
U:
A. AVEFUGE CONCN. , PPM (DRY)
B. Conversion factor, ppm to grains/sc F
(0.00001846 x Molec. Wt.)
C. Avg. Concn. , grains/scf (dry)
(A x B)
D. Stack gas flow rate, scfm (wet)
E. \\ater \apor in gases, vol. %
F. Stack gas flo* rate, scfm (dry)
DC1-0.01C)
G. Flow rate, pounds per hour
0.00857 x C x F
H. Control Efficiency, %
NO*
as N02
(by PUS)

JH
28
32
28
30
0.0008^9
0.0255

—
16^00
3.6

C02
(by TCA)

59000
59500
609CO

59800
0.000812
48.56

~
16*500
6800















•













(a)  No  CO or methane detected by TCA analysis.
                                                                                 60D616 n-1

-------
                    AIR POLL,   ON CONTROL DISTRICT •• COUNTY
  TEST NO.  C-1920

  SAMPLING STATION
. -ho S
 • LOS ANGELES

         PAGE  10

	 DATE  fr-J
                                      GAS VELOCITY DATA
TIME
10:12













12;JO







12:38


POINT
1
2 "
"*
it
5
6
7
8
9
10

Avg 1-10

1
?
3
4
5
6
V
8 '
o
10

Avg 1-10
VEL. HEAD
IN. H20
.10
.12
.11
.r*
.n
.34
.14
.15
.16
.IP



.OS
.11
.13.
.I*}
. ,12
.it
.17
-17
.IS
.-n


TEMP.
°F
160
























	 1
VELOCITY
FT/SEC
22.8
25.0
p"3; o
?6.f)
26.0
— 27 "
27.0
27.9
•9R.Q -
. ?5..D ...

26.0

16.?
OT; 0
«"»/T r»
£U,.u
O^ O
...?fi.n
...07 o
P^.O
._ 2« 0
pFt.o
5Rwn

25.7
VEL, HEAD
IN: H20
.12
.11
',1?
.1?
' .1^
.U
.15
tfi
.T,<;
i?



.06
-\1
— -
.11
1 o
,1^-
u"1 S
.17
-^1^
.T7
T,

TEMP .
°F
160























i
VELOCIT>
FT/SEC
25.0
-_ 2^,9
?R.n
2S.Q
26.0
27,0
27.9
?R Q
?3.o
?n -0

26.4

17-7
O"=i O
— *-^-y—
2^ 0
9c n
0^.0
O'7 O
- *• i . y
T9.8
00 g^
?O P
P6 O

2" n
 10:12  Static -  .02" H?0
        Static -  .02" E20
                                                 25.9
B.
C.
0.
E.
F.
G.
H.
J.
K.
L.
INDICATED VELOCITY (REFERENCE PT.) FT/SEC
FLUF FACTOR, A/R
P'.TOT CORRECTION FACTOR
GAS DENSITY CORRECTION FACTOR
RAI PRF«;«;IIBF IN ^rtrtc , IN, HR. an<;_
GAS PRESS. CORREC. FACTOR, \/?9.9/F ,
CORPFCTFD VF10CITY, AyHxTx^, FT/qFC 	 	
on BxCxPxFxR, FT/SFC 	 ?y.O
ARFA OF FLUE, SO. FT.,., 	
AVPflARF Fl IIP TFMP FBiTIIBC , Of.
FLOW RATE, HX.JXKO, TFM 19700 1

• 1.
1.
•
•50.
0.

25.6
12.
160
9^00

00
00
990
1
997


6



/20
\
M. FLOW XATE, (F/29.9)x520xL/(K+460) ,  sr.FM l6600    16^00
                                                    R- I   60C

-------
                   AIR POLL    ON  CONTROL DISTRICT  -- COUNTY
 •TEST NO.
             C-1920
                                                              LOS ANGELES


                                                                     PAGE JLI_
 SAMPLING STATION
                            Duct to Stack
                                                                     DATE  3-21-73
                                     GAS  VELOCITY DATA
TIME
10:07


















10 1 20





POINT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
fi
•9
10
11
1?
13
1*
15
16
17
18
19
20

IVK n -20

AVR 1-10

VEL, HEAD
IN. H20
.07
ip
.IS
.It
.IS
.17
.18
.?o
-19
.16
.11 .'_
IS
lis1
.Ifi
.17
..Ifi-
.18
.18
-17
.14





TEMP .
°f
160
























VELOCITY
FT/SEC
19.2 .
?S.O
27.9
97,0
27. Q
P0.fi
•vi. 6
•v>.4
•an k
?R a
9-VQ
^7. Q
?7.P
ofi o
PQ.R
9H a
•*).£
^0.6
?QrR
27.0

pR.-^

?8.o

VEL. HEAD
IN H20
.08
.T=! .
, .I1*
1=;
.IS
.16
.?n
.?!
aft
,, .15 .
,no
.1"
.1* ,
.. , O-5 —
.15 .
,17
.17
.17
iR
.W





TEMP.
°F
160
























VELOC ITY
FT/SEC.
P0.il
?6,n
27.0 ,
27 9
?7.9
9ft. Q
??.ll
??•!
•w £
27 9
,. ?l .7
?7.r>
?7.n
27.9
?7TP
2Q.R
?9.fi
po.R :
^n.^
,,27.9

?R.l

PR. 9

VEL. HEAD
IN: H20
.np
.,12
'.It
15
' .TS
,lfi
rpn
^10
.19
.16
4no
.ia
.if;
1*
-IS
.16
.17
-17
.1R
.1^





TEMP .
°F
160
























VELOC i TY
FT/SEC
..?1.7
?",n
27.0
?7 9
97. Q
pfi.p,...
•X9 J{
^1.^
... 3.1..^.
28 o
-.?l.7.._
27.0
27.0
93.0
27.9
- ?StP.
po.R
po.8
- ?0.6.
^%rf <\
£/ .-?

9fi.T

?8.'5

  Static  -  .04" H20

A. INDICATED VELOCITY (TRAVERSE) FT/SEC

                                (1-10)
B. INDICATED VELOCITY (REFERENCE PTS)


C. FLUE FACTOR.A/B	
                                                    28.2
                                                    28.2
                                                     i.oo
D. PiTOT CORRECTION FACTOR



E. GAS DENSITY CORRECTION FACTOR.
                                                     1.00
F. GAS PRESSURE IN STACK, IN. HG. ABS.


G. GAS PRESS. CORREC.


H. CORRECTED VELOCITY,


                  OR BxCxOxExG, FT/SEC


J. AREA OF FLUE, so. FT._	
                                                    30.1
                                                      .997
                                                    28.1
                                                    12.6
K. AVERAGE FLUE TEMPERATURE,


L. FLOW RATE, HxJxSO,


M. FLOW RATE, (F/29.
                                                   160
                                                 21200
                                    ,  SCFM-
                                                 17900
                                                                                   R-\   60C

-------
               AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT ••  COUNC.  OF LOS ANGELES
TEST NO.
          C-1920
                               PAGE
                                                               12
                                                         DATE _U-
                                SAMPLING  APPARATUS

                                   tor S02 and
                  _10Q- ML  100.-. ML drj!L-
                   (a)     (b)
                       t.  SAMPLING  PROBE
                       2.  DRY  f n TEE Whatman Thimble _
                       3.  IMPINGER  (DUST  CONCENTRATION  SAMPLER)
                      '4.  ICE  BATH  CONTAINER
                       5.  THERMOMETER
                       6.  MERCURY MANOMETER
                       7.  SPRAGUE DRY  GAS METER  (ZEPHYR NO.  1A)
                       8.  VACUUM PUMP
                       9.  HOSE CLAMP TO  CONTROL  GAS  FLOW RATE
                          IMPINGER  «="' nrinu
                               filter
isopropyl aleoholt ^0 ml

ppetlvelv.  fb> Two S
                                                       in ml -rea-

                                                         rnnt^im'ng
                             NaOH.  Train 2  (a) two impingers witix
                              isopropyl alcohol,   (b) Two icipingers

                          containing *j% HaOH.
                                                                               16-55-Oie

-------
             AIR PCV 'JTION CONTROL DISTRICT - COUNP" IF LOS ANGELES

                            ENGINEERING  DIVISION

            OBSERVATIONS  DURING  SOURCE  TEST  NO.     c-a920

Stream data follows:

     Spent Acid Densities     755 Acid       13.95 Ibs/eallon
                             85# Acid       14.8? Ibs/gallon

                             Average        l'J.4 Ibs/eallon

                             Product Acid   15-0 Ibs/eallon

     1 gallon/bin (feed)      8.77 tons/day,  product acid
     HgS
     1000 SCFH @ 32°F.        6530 Ibs/day, product acid

Stack observations appear on page 3«  During a period of 3^- hours (11:00 am
to 2:30 pm) no visible  eaission v/as noted.  This can be attributed to the
effectiveness of a "Brink, Mist Elininator" mounted inside the final  absrober,
C-560.

SOo concentration in stack sas is measured once daily by Standard Oil operators.
The 5  A!-! reading was l6o ppra.  The estimated design loss at rated throughput
is 86 Ibs/hr.
                           Maxwell La^.Tonce,  Sr. A. P. Engineer

-------
              AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT - COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
                             ENGINEERING DIVISION
              OBSERVATIONS'OURING SOURCE TEST NO	
N7,1.^   Standard Oil Co-roany of California	   rfsr  ^-3-73
EOU^T Sulfurie Acid H;covery plant	»PPL"H1No.:
 ,£"»«.»«. H":-:^ffi-«kl"-2s32- «™ JMZ	«»   *> to ^ T.?H
 .uce & T i TI re nr
                 Kcsnrs. Bob Ray and Carl Pederson	_	
PERSONS CONTACTED 	
                 Maxwell Lawrence. Senior Air Pollution Engineer
REPORT BY
                        03SERVATJONS MADE AND DATA RECORDED DURING TEST:
     This test was made  to evaluate the operation of a sulfuric acid, recovery
     plant.  Design  recovery is 300 tons of acid (992 H2SOjt) per day.
     At the tine of this, test^ the plant was processing spent acid
     from 75 to 85,? sulfuric acid) and sour gas (HgS).  Based or. feed rates,
     throughput in estimated to bs 8S<5 of capacity;  that is,  265 tons of  acid per
     day.
     Feed and product flows, taken froTi strip-charts,  are listed
           Time          11:15    12:15     1:00     1:'}0     2:10     2:25
     Spen^Acid, (GPH)   19-0    19-0     18.7     19.0     l8.6     18.9
     H2S (SCFH)          28.8 H  30.^     30.8 M   30.8 K   30.8 M   30.8 K
     Fuel Gas (SCFI{)      9.6 M  10.8 M   10.8 M   10.8 H    9-8 M    9-8 M
     Recycle Acid (#)
     Product (GPM)        -       -       25.6     27.2     26.8     26.8

     Feed equivalent of product,  tons/day;
           Tiae          11:15    12:15    1:00     1:^0     2:1O     2:25
      Spent Acid           167      l6?      l^t      163      163      166
      H2S                  9^       99      101      101      101      101
      TOTALS               26l      266      265      26'1      26«f      267
 50C2I7 R1.C1.6                                                                P*M'

-------
      A IK HULLUIIU." l-Ull I rtui. u i :> in ik, i  •
434  SOUTH SAN  PEDI   STREET.  Los ANGELES. CAL
                                    90013 MADISON 9-47JI
ENGINEERING   DIVISIONS-FIELD  REPORT
*AU£ Of 1-PLlC'NT
STAiraARD on, CCMPANY OP CALiPOSJiA, w. OPS., n:c. Jt-3-73
tOUIPMENT LOCATION UoOftC*!) *"
•2'! Vest El Eesundo Boulevard, El Sofrundo, California ^-0^573
""""iv^Vs" HiSOii Kcoovary Plant ios"«?««is SOz. H-.SO-.
oIltJ^T^N Crcui"' Level 100-200 Ft, Ko. & So. "«£•!« 1^0 Ft. "ip-h Stack
.fOHIl pair
,i«o _ ,_, 1 HOURS or FKo-iT.grj P ™ TO o.^O D m
OBSERVATIONS OF VISIBLE AIR CONTAMINANTS
TIME
FROM
11:00
12:00
32:15
12:20
12:?.5
3.2:10
12:^=5
12:'iO
12:^5
12:50
!2i55
1:00
1:10
1:30*
1:^0
1:50
2:00
2:10

•co ton
"8" WEJN3
"*" MCtl.i
- H(«»s
. MC1HJ
TO
11:15
12:15
12-9ft
12-25
12:7O'
12: 15
12:-0
10. Ue^
12:50
12:55
1:00
1:10
1:?0
1:''0
1:50
2:00
2:10
?'.">r>

CO DC:
B\.K<
W1ITC

IflTERVAL
HIN.
UTE£
15
15
S
5
5
5

c
c;
5
5
10
in
in
10
10
10
11
1jQ

*
SEC-
ONDS



















r. Of ACI Tf
OR
RlNCEL-
M^IIN Fi'O
0
»

































1
COLOr)
*(SIE
CODE ,
eCLO«l
V


















•
Heat emission cmlv vaa nctpd.
•


•
•








-

•


1 TOTAL Tl- •" 0^ DlSu--rtC£ OF AIR C- OS C.^EA7f«!
best started
»
P*«E ^ 0
.^./ti\*.tlhl/ff)£fl.'fa.'&
Maxwell Lflvrrcnco, Sr. A. ?. £:. -ir-eci'
r__2_p»cEs i£.' iiios TiJ-SS-S

-------