VINYL  CHLORIDE
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry

U.S. Public Health Service
                                         r
                                         c
                                        22
                                         c
                                         3

-------
                                                         ATSDR/TP-88/25
            TOXICOLOGICAL PROFILE FOR
                  VINYL CHLORIDE
             Date Published — August 1989
                     Prepared by:

             Syracuse Research Corporation
             under Contract No. 68-C8-0004

                         for

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)
              U.S. Public Health Service

                 in collaboration with

      U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
      Technical editing/document preparation by:

           Oak Ridge National Laboratory
                      under
    DOE Interagency Agreement No. 1857-B026-A1

-------
                          DISCLAIMER

Mention of company name or product does not constitute endorsement by
the Agency for Toxic Substance* and Disease Registry.

-------
                                FOREWORD

     The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (Public
Law 99-499) extended and amended the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA or Superfund)
This public law (also known as SARA) directed the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) to prepare toxicological
profiles for hazardous substances which are most commonly found at
facilities on the CERCLA National Priorities List and which pose the
most significant potential threat to human health, as determined by
ATSDR and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The list of the 100
most significant hazardous substances was published in the Federal
Register on April 17, 1987.

     Section 110 (3) of SARA directs the Administrator of ATSDR to
prepare a toxicological profile for each substance on the list. Each
profile must include the following content:

     "(A)  An examination, summary, and interpretation of available
     toxicological information and epidemiologic evaluations on a
     hazardous substance in order to ascertain the levels of significant
     human exposure for the substance and the associated acute,
     subacute, and chronic health effects.

     (B)  A determination of whether adequate information on the health
     effects of each substance is available or in the process of
     development to determine levels of exposure which present a
     significant risk to human health of acute, subacute, and chronic
     health effects.

     (C)  Where appropriate, an identification of toxicological testing
     needed to identify the types or levels of exposure that may present
     significant risk of adverse health effects in humans."

     This toxicological profile is prepared in accordance with
guidelines developed by ATSDR and EPA. The guidelines were published in
the Federal Register on April 17, 1987. Each profile will be revised and
republished as necessary, but no less often than every three years, as
required by SARA.

     The ATSDR toxicological profile is intended to characterize
succinctly the toxicological and health effects information for the
hazardous substance being described. Each profile identifies and reviews
the key literature that describes a hazardous substance's toxicological
properties. Other literature is presented but described in less detail
than the key studies. The profile is not intended to be an exhaustive
document; however, more comprehensive sources of specialty information
are referenced.
                                                                     iii

-------
Foreword
     Each toxicological profile begins with a public health statement,
which describes in nontechnical language a substance's relevant
toxicological properties. Following the statement is material that
presents levels of significant human exposure and, where known,
significant health effects. The adequacy of information to determine a
substance's health effects is described in a health effects summary.
Research gaps in toxicologic and health effects information are
described in the profile. Research gaps that are of significance to
protection of public health will be identified by ATSDR, the National
Toxicology Program of the Public Health Service, and EPA. The focus of
the profiles is on health and toxicological information; therefore, we
have included this information in the front of the document.
     The principal audiences for the toxicological profiles are health
professionals at the federal, state, and local levels, interested
private sector organizations and groups, and members of the public. We
plan to revise these documents in response to public comments and as
additional data become available; therefore, we encourage comment that
will make the toxicological profile series of the greatest use.

     This profile reflects our assessment of all relevant toxicological
testing and information that has been peer reviewed. It has been
reviewed by scientists from ATSDR, EPA, the Centers for Disease Control,
and the National Toxicology Program. It has also been reviewed by a
panel of nongovernment peer reviewers and was made available for public
review. Final responsibility for the contents and views expressed in
this toxicological profile resides with ATSDR.
                                     Ut«*u-
                                    James 0. Mason, M.D. , Dr. P.M.
                                    Assistant Surgeon General
                                    Administrator, ATSDR
iv

-------
                                CONTENTS

FOREWORD 	     iii

LIST OF FIGURES 	    ix

LIST OF TABLES 	    xL

 1.   PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT  	     1
     1.1  WHAT IS VINYL CHLORIDE?  	     1
     1.2  HOW MIGHT I  BE EXPOSED TO  VINYL CHLORIDE?  	     1
     1.3  HOW DOES VINYL CHLORIDE  GET INTO MY BODY?  	     2
     1.4  HOW CAN VINYL CHLORIDE AFFECT MY HEALTH? 	     2
     1.5  IS THERE A MEDICAL  TEST  TO DETERMINE IF I  HAVE BEEN
          EXPOSED TO VINYL CHLORIDE? 	     2
     1.6  WHAT LEVELS  OF EXPOSURE  HAVE RESULTED IN HARMFUL
          HEALTH EFFECTS? 	     3
     1.7  WHAT RECOMMENDATIONS  HAS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT
          MADE TO PROTECT HUMAN HEALTH? 	     3

 2.   HEALTH EFFECTS SUMMARY 	     7
     2.1  INTRODUCTION 	     7
     2.2  LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE 	     8
          2.2.1  Key Studies  and Graphical Presentations 	     8
                 2.2.1.1  Inhalation 	     8
                 2.2.1.2  Oral  	    15
                 2.2.1.3  Dermal 	    15
          2.2.2  Biological Monitoring as a Measure  of
                 Exposure and Effects 	    15
          2.2.3  Environmental  Levels as Indicators  of
                 Exposure and Effects 	    16
                 2.2.3.1  Levels found in the environment 	    16
                 2.2.3.2  Human exposure potential 	    18
     2. 3  ADEQUACY OF DATABASE  	    19
          2.3.1  Introduction 	    19
          2.3.2  Health Effect  End Points 	    19
                 2.3.2.1  Introduction and graphic summary 	    19
                 2.3.2.2  Descriptions of highlights of graphs ....    22
                 2.3.2.3  Summary  of relevant ongoing research ....    23
          2.3.3  Other Information Needed for Human
                 Health Assessment 	    23
                 2.3.3.1  Pharmacokinetics and mechanisms of
                           action  	    23
                 2.3.3.2  Monitoring of human biological samples ..    24
                 2.3.3.3  Environmental considerations  	    24

 3.   CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL INFORMATION  	    25
     3.1  CHEMICAL IDENTITY 	    25
     3.2  PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES  	    25

-------
Concents
4 . TOXICOLOGICAL DATA 	
4 . 1 OVERVIEW 	
4 . 2 TOXICOKINETICS 	
4.2.1 Absorption 	
4.2.1.1 Inhalation 	
4.2.1.2 Oral 	
4.2.1.3 Dermal 	
4.2.2 Distribution 	
4.2.2.1 Inhalation 	
4.2.2.2 Oral 	
4.2.2.3 Dermal 	
4.2.3 Metabolism 	
4.2.3.1 Inhalation 	
4.2.3.2 Oral 	
4.2.3.3 Dermal 	
4.2.4 Excretion 	
4.2.4.1 Inhalation 	
4.2.4.2 Oral 	
4.2.4.3 Dermal 	
4.2.4.4 Parenteral 	
4 . 3 TOXICITY 	
4.3.1 Lethality and Decreased Longevity 	
4.3.1.1 Inhalation 	
4.3.1.2 Oral 	
4.3.1.3 Dermal 	
4.3.2 Systemic/Target Organ Toxicity 	
4.3.2.1 Hepatotoxicity 	
4.3.2.2 Nervous system effects 	
4.3.2.3 Other systemic effects 	
4.3.3 Developmental Toxicity 	
4.3.3.1 Inhalation 	
4.3.3.2 Oral 	
4.3.3.3 Dermal 	
4.3.3.4 General discussion 	
4.3.4 Reproductive Toxicity 	
4.3.4.1 Inhalation 	
4.3.4.2 Oral 	
4.3.4.3 Dermal 	
4.3.4.4 General discussion 	
4 . 3 . 5 Genotoxicity 	
4 , V 5 . 1 Human 	
4.3.5.2 Nonhuman 	
4 . 3 . 5 . 3 General discussion 	
4.3.6 Carcinogeniclty 	
4.3.6.1 Inhalation 	
4.3.6.2 Oral 	
4.3.6.3 Dermal 	
4.3.6.4 General discussion 	
4.4 INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER CHEMICALS 	
5 . MANUFACTURE. IMPORT. USE, AND DISPOSAL 	
5 . 1 OVERVIEW 	
5 . 2 PRODUCTION 	
5 . 3 IMPORT 	

	 29
	 29
	 30
	 30
	 30
	 30
	 31
	 31
	 31
	 31
	 32
	 32
	 32
	 34
	 35
	 35
	 35
	 37
	 37
	 39
	 39
	 39
	 39
	 40
	 40
	 40
	 40
	 44
	 45
	 47
	 47
	 49
	 49
	 50
	 50
	 50
	 51
	 51
	 51
	 51
	 51
	 53
	 53
	 55
	 55
	 58
	 60
	 60
	 60
	 63
	 63
	 63
	 63
vi

-------
                                                                Concent*
      5.4 USES
      5 . 5 DISPOSAL
                                             ..................        64
  6 .   ENVIRONMENTAL FATE  ......................                         65
      6 . 1  OVERVIEW .............................. ..................    65
      6 . 2  RELEASES TO THE ENVIRONMENT ........ . ....................    65
      6 . 3  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE ..........           ..................    65
                                           '''''''''''''''''"
          6-3-2  Water
          6-3.3  Soil
                                                                      66
  7.   POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE ...                                  6g
      7 . 1  OVERVIEW ....................... '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'. ...........    69
      7 . 2  LEVELS MONITORED OR ESTIMATED IN  THE ENVIRONMENT .........    69
          7-2. i  Air ....................................... ;;;;;;;    69
          7.2.2  Water ...............                                 70
          7.2.3  Soil ................           ...................    71
          7.2.4  Other ................         ...................    7{
      7 . 3  OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES .......     .......................    72
      7.4  POPULATIONS AT HIGH RISK ................ '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.    72
  8 .   ANALYTICAL METHODS ....................                           7,
      8 . 1  ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA ............ '.'. .......................    73
      8 . 2  BIOMEDICAL SAMPLES .............. '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.    73
  9.   REGULATORY AND ADVISORY STATUS  ........                           79
      9 . 1  INTERNATIONAL ..........                ..................    79
      9 . 2  NATIONAL ........................ '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'    79
          9.2.1  Regulations ....................... ,.[. ...........    79
                 9.2.1.1  Air ................. '.', ..................    79
                 9.2.1.2  Water ......................... '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.    79
                 9.2.1.3  Food ................................        79
                 9.2.1.4  Other ......................... ''." ......    gO
          9.2.2  Advisory Guidance  .................. '. .............    80
                 9.2.2.1  Air ................................. ;;;;    80
                 9.2.2.2  Water .................................     80
          9.2.3  Data Analysis ....................... '.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.    80
                 9.2.3.1  Reference doses (RfDs)  ..................    80
                 9.2.3.2  Carcinogenic  potency ..................      81
     9.3  STATE .................  ..... . ..... . ................ ;;;;;    JJ
10.  REFERENCES [[[    83

-------
                            LIST OF FIGURES
1.1  Health effects from breathing vinyl chloride 	    4
1.2  Health effects from ingesting vinyl chloride 	     5
2.1  Effects of vinyl chloride--inhalation exposure 	     9
2.2  Effects of vinyl chloride--oral exposure 	    10
2.3  Levels of significant exposure for vinyl chloride--
     inhalation 	   11
2.4  Levels of significant exposure for vinyl chloride--oral 	    12
2.5  Urinary output of thiodiglycolic acid from volunteers
     12 h after exposure to vinyl chloride in air for 12 h 	   17
2.6  Availability of information on health effects of
     vinyl chloride (human data) 	   20
2.7  Availability of information on health effects of
     vinyl chloride (animal data) 	   21
4.1  Proposed metabolic pathways for vinyl chloride 	   33
                                                                      ix

-------
                             LIST OF TABLES
3 . 1  Chemical identity of vinyl chloride ..........................   26
3.2  Physical and chemical properties of vinyl chloride ..........    27
4.1  Excretion of radioactivity in rats exposed to ^C- vinyl
     chloride in air for 6 h .....................................   16
4.2  Percent of administered dose of radioactivity excreted 72 h
     following a single oral dose of 14C- vinyl chloride
     in rats [[[   38
4.3  Experimental protocol for animal exposure to vinyl chloride ..   41
4.4  Genotoxicity of vinyl chloride in vivo ......................   52
4.5  Genotoxicity of vinyl chloride in vitro ......................   54
4.6  Tumor incidence in male and female Sprague-Dawley
     rats exposed by inhalation to vinyl chloride
     4 h/day, 5 days/week for 52 weeks ............................   57
4.7  Tumor incidence in Uistar rats orally exposed to
     vinyl chloride ...............................................   59
8.1  Analytical methods for the quantification of vinyl chloride ..   75

-------
                       1.   PUBLIC HEALTH STATEMENT

 1.1  WHAT IS VINYL CHLORIDE?

      Vinyl chloride is a  colorless gas with a mild,  sweet odor.  It is  a
 man-made chemical that does not occur naturally in the environment  Most
 of the vinyl chloride produced in the United States  is used to make
 polyvinyl chloride (PVC).  This material is used to manufacture a variety
 of plastic and vinyl products  including pipes,  wire  and cable coatings,
 packaging materials,  furniture and automobile upholstery,  wall
 coverings,  housewares,  and automotive parts.  Much smaller amounts of
 vinyl chloride are used as a cooling gas and in the  manufacture  of other
 compounds.

 1.2  HOW MIGHT I  BE EXPOSED TO VINYL CHLORIDE?

      Humans are exposed to vinyl  chloride from  environmental  and
 occupational sources.  Vinyl chloride has been found  in at  least  133 of
 1.177 hazardous waste  sites on the National Priorities List (NPL).  Vinyl
 chloride is mainly released into  the air and discharged in wastewater
 from  the plastics  industries (primarily vinyl chloride and PVC
 manufacturers). Most of the vinyl  chloride  that enters the environment
 eventually  ends up in  air  where  it gradually breaks  down into less
 harmful  substances. The levels  of  vinyl chloride found in  the
 environment are usually more than  a thousand times lower than levels
 found in occupational  settings. Outdoor levels  in the  environment are
 usually  expressed  in terms  of  parts  of  vinyl  chloride  present in a
 billion  parts  of air or water  (ppb).  Outdoor  levels  of vinyl  chloride
 result from the discharge  of exhaust gases  from factories  that
 manufacture or process  vinyl chloride,  or evaporation  from areas where
 chemical  wastes are stored. Highest  outdoor levels have been  measured  in
 air near  vinyl  chloride factories  or over chemical waste storage areas
 Tests published in 1976 suggest that the  air  inside  new cars  may contain
 levels of vinyl chloride higher than expected for that location,  because
 vinyl chloride  may seep into the air from the new plastic  parts.  Levels
 of vinyl  chloride  are expected to  drop  rapidly,  however, when doors or
 windows are  opened or when  the heater or  air  conditioner is operated.

     Vinyl  chloride that enters drinking  water  comes from  factories that
 release wastes containing  it into  rivers  and  lakes and from its  seepage
 into underground water  in areas where chemical  wastes  containing it are
 stored. Small amounts of vinyl chloride can enter the  drinking water
 from contact with polyvinyl chloride pipes. In  the past, higher  than
 expected amounts were present in foods packaged in plastic  that
 contained vinyl chloride.  Currently, the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration  (FDA) limits the amount of vinyl  chloride allowed in
packaging materials that contact food in  order  to limit  the intake of
vinyl chloride.

-------
2   Section 1

     Vinyl chloride manufacturing or processing factories may have
indoor levels of vinyl chloride that are  much  higher than those  from
outdoor sources. Levels expressed in terms  of  parts  of vinyl  chloride
per million parts of air (ppm)  have  been  measured in vinyl chloride
manufacturing plants.

1.3  HOV DOES VINYL CHLORIDE GET INTO XT  BODY?
     The most likely way that vinyl  chloride can enter your body is if
you breathe air containing it.  This  path  of exposure is of concern for
persons employed in vinyl chloride manufacturing or  processing,  for
people living in communities where vinyl  chloride plants are  located,
and for individuals living near hazardous waste disposal sites.  Vinyl
chloride can also enter your body if you  eat food or drink water
containing it. Passage of vinyl chloride  through the skin is  not likely
to be an important pathway.

1.4  HOV CAN VINYL CHLORIDE AFFECT MY HEALTH?
     Short-term exposures to very high levels  of vinyl chloride  in air
can cause dizziness, stumbling and lack of  muscle coordination,
headache, unconsciousness, and death. Long-term exposure to lower but
unmeasured amounts in factories where vinyl chloride is made  or
processed has caused "vinyl chloride disease." This  disease is
characterized by severe damage to the liver, effects on the lungs, poor
circulation in the fingers, changes  in the  bones at  the end of the
fingers, thickening of the skin, and changes  in the  blood. An increased
risk of developing cancer of the liver and  possibly  several other
tissues has been linked with breathing air  in  factories containing vinyl
chloride. Studies designed to determine if  the low levels of vinyl
chloride measured in outside air, drinking  water, or food could cause
harmful effects in humans have not been performed.
     Some of the health effects observed  in humans have also been seen
in laboratory animals. Effects on the nervous  system of animals have
occurred after short-term exposure to very  high levels of vinyl chloride
in air. Effects on the liver developed in animals after short-term
exposure to high levels and after longer-term exposure to lower levels
of vinyl chloride. Kidney effects also occurred after exposure to high
levels. Laboratory animals developed cancer in several tissues after
eating food or breathing air that contained vinyl chloride. Effects on
the testes were seen in male rats that breathed air containing vinyl
chloride, but information  is not sufficient to determine whether humans
exposed to vinyl chloride develop effects on the testes.

1.5  IS THERE A MEDICAL TEST TO DETERMINE IF I HAVE BEEN
     EXPOSED TO VINYL CHLORIDE?
     Vinyl chloride can be measured  in urine and body  tissues, but  the
tests cannot be used to determine what levels of vinyl chloride you were
exposed to. Measuring the  amount of  the major breakdown product of  vinyl
chloride in the urine may  give some  indication of recent  exposure;
however, people differ in  the quantity of excretion of this breakdown
product. Neither of  these  tests  is routinely available at your doctor's
office. The laboratory tests commonly used by doctors  to  evaluate  liver

-------
                                             Public HeaLch Seacement   3

damage and liver function are usually not helpful for determining if
liver damage from vinyl chloride exposure has occurred.

1.6  WHAT LEVELS OF EXPOSURE HAVE RESULTED IN HARMFUL HEALTH EFFECTS?

     The graphs on the following pages show the link between exposure to
vinyl chloride and known health effects. In the first set of graphs
labeled "Health effects from breathing vinyl chloride" (Fig. 1.1),
exposure is expressed in parts of vinyl chloride per million parts  of
air (ppm).  In the second set of graphs, the same relationship is shown
for the known "Health effects from ingesting vinyl chloride" (Fig.  1.2).
Exposures are expressed in milligrams of vinyl chloride per kilogram of
body weight per day (mg/kg/day).  In both graphs, effects in animals are
shown on the left, effects in humans on the right.

     The first column, labeled "Short-term exposure," refers to effects
associated with exposure durations of 14 days or less. The column
labeled "Long-term exposure" refers to exposures lasting longer than 14
days. The levels marked on the graphs as "Minimal risk for effects  othej
than cancer" are estimates based on information obtained from laboratory
animals and, therefore, are subject to the uncertainties involved in
using animal data to predict effects in humans.
     Vinyl chloride is regarded worldwide as a chemical that causes
cancer in humans, but exposure levels necessary to cause cancer in
humans are not known. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA),
therefore,  used available data in animals to estimate that breathing air
containing 1 ppm vinyl chloride every day for 70 years may place as many
as 1,100 persons in a population of 10,000 (or 1,100,000 persons in a
population of 10,000,000) at risk of developing cancer. Eating  food
containing 1 ppm vinyl chloride every day for 70 years may place as many
as 644 persons in a population of 10,000 (or 644,000 persons in a
population of 10,000,000) at risk of developing cancer. Similarly,
drinking water containing 1 ppm vinyl chloride every day for 70 years
may place as many as 657 persons in a population of 10,000  (or  657,000
persons in a population of 10,000,000) at risk of developing cancer. It
should be noted that these risk values are plausible upper-limit
estimates based on information obtained from animal studies. Actual risk
levels are unlikely to be higher and may be lower.

1.7  WHAT RECOMMENDATIONS HAS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT MADE TO PROTECT
     HUMAN HEALTH?

     EPA stated that community drinking water systems  that  regularly
serve the same 25 persons for at least 8 months of the year must limit
vinyl chloride in the drinking water to 2 j*g/L  (2 ppb) , starting
January 9,  1989. In order to limit intake of vinyl chloride in  food to
levels considered to be safe, the Food and Drug Administration  (FDA)
recently changed its regulations regarding the vinyl chloride content of
various plastics that contact food and carry water used in  food
processing, and of plastics that are used in food packaging. Limits
range from 5 to 50 ppm, depending on the nature of the plastic  and  its
use.

-------
    Section 1
      SHORT-TERM EXPOSURE
  (LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 14 DAYS)
      LONG-TERM EXPOSURE
     (GREATER THAN 14 DAYS)
EFFECTS
IN
ANIMALS
CONC. IN
AR
(ppm)
EFFECTS
IN
HUMANS
EFFECTS
IN
ANIMALS
CONC. IN
AIR
(ppm)
EFFECTS
IN
HUMANS
            10.000
       10.000
                       EFFECTS ON
                       BRAIN FUNCTION
                                        EFFECTS -
DEATH.—
LIVER
EFFECTS
            ,1.000
        1.000
             100
                                                       100
                                  TESTICULAR
                                  EFFECTS
              10
                                              REDUCED
                                              LIFE SPAN-
LIVER     1Q
EFFECTS- °
              1.0
                                                       1.0
              0.1
                                                       0.1
                    QUANTITATIVE DATA
                    WERE NOT
                    AVAILABLE
                  Fit. 1.1. HnJdi effect! tnm
    ffayl

-------
                                                 Public Health Statement
     SHORT-TERM EXPOSURE
 (LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO 14 DAYS)
         LONG-TERM EXPOSURE
        (GREATER THAN 14 DAYS)
EFFECTS
IN
ANIMALS

DOSE
(mg/kg/day)
EFFECTS
IN
HUMANS
EFFECTS
IN
ANIMALS

OOSE
(mg/kg/day)
EFFECTS
IN
HUMANS
             1.000
DEATH-
                                                          1.000
                      QUANTITATIVE
                      DATA WERE
                      NOT AVAILABLE
             100
                                                           100
              10
EFFECTS ON
BLOOD
                                                           10
             1 0
                                                          10
                                         DECREASED LIFE
                                         SPAN AND LIVER
                                         EFFECTS
             01
                                                          01
            0.01
                                                          001
            0.001
                                                         0.001
                          • MINIMAL RISK
                           LEVEL FOR
                           EFFECTS
                           OTHER THAN
                           CANCER
               Fig. 1.2. Health effects from ingesting vinyl chloride.

-------
6   Section 1

     In order to control the handling of vinyl chloride,  EPA has named
the chemical as a hazardous component of solid waste.  If quantities
greater than 1 pound are released to the environment,  the National
Response Center of the Federal Government must be notified immediately.
     The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
regulations state that a worker must not be exposed to a concentration
of vinyl chloride in air that exceeds 1 ppm over any 8-hour work period
in a 40-hour workweek and that the concentration must not exceed 5 ppm
for more than 15 minutes. The National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health (NIOSH) recommends that workers exposed to any measurable
amount of vinyl chloride wear an air-supplied respirator. EPA has
determined that factories must limit the release of vinyl chloride in
air to 10 ppm.

-------
                        2.  HEALTH EFFECTS SUMMARY

 2.1  INTRODUCTION

      This section summarizes and graphs data on the health effects
 concerning exposure to vinyl chloride.  The purpose of this section is  to
 present levels of significant exposure  for vinyl chloride based on key
 toxicological studies, epidemiological  investigations,  and environmental
 exposure data. The information presented in this section is critically
 evaluated and discussed in Sect.  4,  Toxicological Data,  and Sect.  7,
 Potential for Human Exposure.

      This Health Effects  Summary section comprises two  major parts
 Levels  of Significant Exposure (Sect. 2.2) presents brief narratives and
 graphics for key studies  in a manner that provides public health
 officials,  physicians,  and other interested individuals  and groups with
 (1)  an  overall perspective of the toxicology of vinyl chloride  and (2) a
 summarized depiction of significant  exposure levels associated  with
 various adverse health effects.  This section also includes information
 on  the  levels of vinyl chloride  that have been monitored in human  fluids
 and tissues  and information about levels of vinyl chloride found in
 environmental media and their  association with human exposures.

      The significance  of  the  exposure levels shown on the graphs may
 differ  depending on the user's perspective.  For example,  physicians
 concerned with the  interpretation of overt clinical findings  in exposed
 persons or with the  identification of persons  with the potential to
 develop such  disease may be  interested  in levels of exposure  associated
 with  frank effects  (Frank  Effect  Level,  FEL).  Public health officials
 and project managers concerned with  response actions at  Superfund  sites
 may want information on levels of exposure associated with more  subtle
 effects  in humans or animals  (Lowest-Observed-Adverse-Effect  Level,
 LOAEL)  or exposure  levels below which no  adverse effects  (No-Observed-
 Adverse -Effect  Level, NOAEL) have  been  observed.  Estimates of levels
 posing  minimal  risk to  humans  (Minimal  Risk  Levels,  MRL)  are  of  interest
 to health professionals and citizens alike.

     Adequacy of Database  (Sect.  2.3) highlights the availability  of key
 studies  on exposure to vinyl chloride in  the scientific  literature  and
 displays these  data in  three-dimensional  graphs  consistent with  the
 format  in Sect. 2.2. The purpose of  this  section is  to suggest where
 there might be  insufficient information to establish levels of
 significant human exposure. These areas  will be  considered by the Agency
 for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry  (ATSDR).  EPA,  and the  National
Toxicology Program (NTP) of the U.S.  Public Health  Service  in order to
develop a research agenda for vinyl chloride.

-------
8   Section 2

2.2  LEVELS OF SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE

     To help public health professionals address the needs of persons
living or working near hazardous waste sites,  the toxicology data
summarized in this section are organized first by route of exposure--
inhalation, ingestion, and dermal--and then by toxicological end points
that are categorized into six general areas--lethality, systemic/target
organ toxicity, developmental toxicity, reproductive toxicity,  genetic
toxicity, and carcinogenicity. The data are discussed in terms of three
exposure periods--acute, intermediate, and chronic.
     Two kinds of graphs are used to depict the data. The first type is
a "thermometer" graph. It provides a graphical summary of the human and
animal toxicological end points (and levels of exposure) for each
exposure route for which data are available. The ordering of effects
does not reflect the exposure duration or species of animal tested. The
second kind of graph shows Levels of Significant Exposure (LSE) for each
route and exposure duration. The points on the graph showing NOAELs and
LOAELs reflect the actual doses (levels of exposure) used in the key
studies. No adjustments for exposure duration or intermittent exposure
protocol were made.
     Adjustments reflectii 3 the uncertainty of extrapolating animal data
to man, intraspecies variations, and differences between experimental vs
actual human exposure conditions were considered when estimates of
levels posing minimal risk to human health were made for noncancer end
points. These minimal risk levels were derived for the most sensitive
noncancer end point for each exposure duration by applying uncertainty
factors. These levels are shown on the graphs as a broken line starting
from the actual dose  (level of exposure) and ending with a concave-
curved line at its terminus. Although methods have been established  to
derive these minimal  risk levels  (Barnes et al. 1987), shortcomings
exist in the techniques that reduce confidence in the projected
estimates. Also shown on the graphs under the cancer end point are low-
level risks (10"^ to  10'7) reported by EPA. In addition, the actual  dose
(level of exposure) associated with the tumor incidence is plotted.

2.2.1  Key Studies and Graphical  Presentations
     Dose-response-duration data  for  the toxicity and  carcinogenicity of
vinyl chloride are displayed  in two types of graphs. These "data are
derived from the key  studies described in the following sections.  The
"thermometer" graphs  in Figs. 2.1 and  2.2 plot exposure levels vs  NOAELs
and LOAELs for various effects and durations of  inhalation and oral
exposures, respectively. The  graphs of levels of significant exposure  in
Figs. 2.3 and 2.4 plot end-point-specific NOAELs and LOAELs  and minimal
levels of risk for acute (<14 days),  intermediate (15-364 days), and
chronic  (>365 days) duration  for  inhalation and  oral exposures,
respectively.

2.2.1.1  Inhalation
     Lethality and decreased  longevity.  Acute  occupational  exposure to
high unspecified concentrations of vinyl chloride has  caused death in
humans  (ACGIH  1986a)  probably due to  narcosis.  Guinea  pigs  exposed to

-------
                                                                  Health Effects  Summary    9
                                                                                     HUMANS
                                                                                      (ppm)
1.000.000 ^»
 100.000
  10000
   1000
    100
                                                                                1 000000 r—
   • RABBIT LCW 2 h CONTINUOUS




-  • GUINEA PW NAflCOSS AND OEATM. 30-MMN CONTINUXIS

   • DOGS. ANESTHESIA

   • MATS. INTOXICATION 2 h. CONTINUOUS



   • GUINEA PIG. ATAX1A. 2 MM
                                                                                 100000 -
                                                                                  10.000
  • RAT RENAL TOXKITY ANEMM. 12 MONTHS. INTERMITTENT



  O RABBT. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXIOTV. 13 DAYS. INTERMTrTENT



  ^*RAT. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICfTV 7-6 DAYS. INTERMrTTENT
  °J» MOUSE. ACUTE LETHALITY. HEPATOTOJOCITY t DAYS INTERMTrTENT
    I* MOUSE. BODY WEIGHT LOSS. • MONTHS. MTERMTTENT


  O RAT DEVELOPMENTAL TOXKITY. 10 DAYS. MTERMnTENT
            (O MOUSE. ACUTE LETHALITY. MTERMnTENT     	
            \O MOUSE. BODY WEIGHT LOSS 12 MONTHS. MTERMnTENT
     • RAT.HEPATOTOXICrTY 6 MONTHS. INTERMTrTENT
     • RAT REDUCED BODY WEIGHT TESDCULAP EFFECTS. 12 MONTHS. INTEPMTTENT
     6 MOUSE. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICrTY. 10 DAYS. INTEHMrTTENT
     • RAT. MOUSE. REDUCED SURVIVAL, S-12 MONTHS. INTERMnTENT
     • RAT. HEPATOTOXXaTY. 12 MONTHS. INTERMnTENT
     • RAT. UVER CANCER 52 WEEKS. WTERMTTENT
     • HAMSTER. MOUSE. UVER CANCER. 30 WEEKS. INTERMTTENT
               MOUSE. LUMP CANCER 4 WEEKS. INTERMTTTENT
               RAT. HEPATOTOXtOTY a MONTHS. INTERMnTENT
               RAT. REDUCED BODY WEIGHT TESTCULAR EFFECTS. 12 MONTHS. INTERMTTTENT
                                                                                   1.000
                                                                                     100
                                                                                           * CNS EFFECTS
                                                                                        L- A  GENOTOXICITY
                        • LOAELFORANMALS
                        O NOAELFORANUMLS
                                              A LOAEL FOR HUMANS
                                              A NOAEL FOR HUMANS
                       Flf.2.1. Effeett of

-------
10    Section  2
   ANIMALS
  (mg/kg/day)


  1000  r—
   100
    10
   01 I—
             RAT. LD,o


             RAT. HEPATOXOCITY. 13 WEEKS
                                                     HUMANS
O RAT. HEPATOTOXICITY. 13 WEEKS



• RAT. HEMATOLOGIC EFFECTS. LIFETIME




O RAT. HEMATOLOGIC EFFECTS. LIFETIME




• RAT. CANCER. LIFETIME

• RAT. DECREASED SURVIVAL. HEPATOTOXICITY. LIFETIME
O  RAT. DECREASED SURVIVAL. HEPATOTOTXICITY. LIFETIME

          • LOAEL
          O NOAEL
                                                                   QUANTITATIVE DATA
                                                                   WERE NOT AVAILABLE
                     Fig. 2.2.  Effects of vinyl chloride—oral exposure.

-------
                                                                                                Health  Effects Summary     11
                                                        ACUTE
                                                      (SI 4 DAYS)
                INTERMEDIATE
                (15-364 DAYS)
                      CHRONIC
                     12365 DAYS)
                                                       DEVELOP   TARGET             TARGET   REPRO    DECREASED   TARGET
                                             LETHALITY   MENTAL   ORGAN   LETHALITY  ORGAN    DUCTION    LONGEVITY   ORGAN    CANCER
                                       ippm)

                                 1 000.000 r
                                  100.000
                                                •g
                                                                 • d(CNS)
                                                                 • r (CNS)
                                   10000
                                                                 A (CNS)
                                    1 000
                                     100
                                      10
                                     1 0
                                     0 1
                                    001
                                                r
                                                        Or
• m(LIVER)
                                                                                               r(TESTIS)
                                                                                                                    '(LIVER)    •' s
                   ff (LIVER) 6
                                                                                    Vl/
                                   0001
                                  00001
                                 000001 -
                                0 000001
                                                                                                                        10-* -,
                                                                                                                        to-' J
                                                                                                                              ESTIMATED
                                                                                                                              UPPER BOUND
                                                                                                                              HUMAN
                                                                                                                              CANCER
                                                                                                                              RISK LEVELS
                                                    h  RABBIT
                                                    g  GUINEA PIG
                                                    0  DOG
                                                    r  RAT
                                                    m  MOUSE
                                                    S  HAMSTER
 A LOAEL FOR HUMANS
 • LOAEL FOR ANIMALS
 O NOAEL FOR ANIMALS
!
    LOAEL AND NOAEL
     IN THE SAME SPECIES
I  MINIMAL RISK LEVEL
I   FOR EFFECTS OTHER
I   THAN CANCER
                                              Fig. 2.3.  Levels of significant exposure for vinyl chloride—inhalation.

-------
12     Section 2
ACUTE INTERMEDIATE CHRONIC
(SI 4 DAYS) ( 1 5-384 DAYS) (2365 DAYS)

DEVELOP- TARGET TARGET REPRO- DECREASED
LETHALITY MENTAL ORGAN LETHALITY ORGAN DICTION LONGEVITY
(mgfkgftjiy)
1 000
100
10
1
0 1
001
0001

00001
0 00001
0 000001
0000001
~
• r (LIVER)
'
• r
O
-
_

-


TARGET
ORGAN CANCER



• r(HEMAT)
• r(UVER) *'
-•

w
10-*-,
ESTIMATED
UPPER BOUND
HUMAN
10-»- CANCER
RISK LEVELS

<-
                r RAT   •LOAEL   • LOAEL AND NOAEL     i MINIMAL RISK LEVEL
                        ONOAEL   A IN THE SAME SPECIES   i FOR EFFECTS IN
                                                       THE SAME SPECIES
                  Fig. 2.4.  Leveb of significant exposure for rinyl chloride—oral.

-------
                                             Health Effects Summary   13

100,000 ppm died vichin 30 minutes as a result of central nervous system
(CNS) depression (Patty et al.  1930). Levels plotted as LOAELs on the
graphs in Figs. 2.1 and 2.3 include a 2-h LC5Q of 230,800 ppm in rabbits
(EPA 198Sa),  a level of 100,000 ppm that was lethal in guinea pigs after
30 to 60 min (Patty et al. 1930),  a level of 1,000 ppm that decreased
survival in mice exposed intermittently for 5 days (Lee et al. 1977a),
and a level of SO ppm that decreased survival in rats and mice exposed
intermittently for 6 to 12 months  (Lee et al. 1977a, Hong et al. 1981).
     Systemic/target organ toxicity.  Humans occupationally exposed to
high levels of vinyl chloride have suffered from a syndrome called vinyl
chloride disease, which displays manifold signs of toxicity involving
the liver,  CNS, and peripheral circulation and nerves. Exposures have
not been quantified, however, and  thresholds for this syndrome have not
been identified. Important target  organs in animals are the liver and
CNS. CNS effects generally follow  acute exposure to high levels (see
Figs. 2.1 and 2.3), such as 8,000  ppm associated with CNS effects in
humans (Lester et al. 1963), 70,000 ppm associated with anesthesia in
dogs (Oster et al. 1947),  and 50,000 ppm associated with intoxication in
rats (Lester et al. 1963). CNS effects involving occupational exposure
have been reported, but exposures  have not been quantified (Dinceva et
al. 1985, Perticoni et al. 1986, Halama et al. 1985).
     The liver appears to be the most sensitive organ in humans and
animals. Acute hepatotoxicity was  observed in mice dying after
intermittent exposure to 1,000 ppm for 5 to 9 days  (Lee et al.  1977a)
(see Figs.  2.1 and 2.3). In rats,  exposures of intermediate (6 months)
duration to 10 ppm were a LOAEL for liver effects (Bi et al.  1985) (see
Figs. 2.1 and 2.3). A chronic LOAEL for liver effects in rats was
observed at 50 ppm in a chronic (12 months) experiment (Lee et  al.
1977a) (see Figs. 2.1 and 2.3). However, since this was the lowest
concentration tested, a chronic NOAEL could not be determined. After
12-month exposure, 100 ppm was a LOAEL and 10 ppm was a NOAEL for
reduced terminal body weights in rats (Bi et al. 1985) (Fig.  2.1).
Minimal risk levels are not estimated in Fig. 2.3 based on liver
toxicity at the acute level of 1,000 ppm, because this level  was a frank
effect level, and a NOAEL or LOAEL was not identified. A minimal risk
level of 0.005 ppm for intermediate exposure is based on the  LOAEL for
liver effects observed in rats exposed intermittently to 10 ppm for
6 months (Bi et al. 1985). Data were not sufficient  to estimate a
minimal risk level for chronic exposure.
     Developmental toxicity.  Several epidemiology  studies  (Infante  et
al. 1976; Vaxweiler et al. 1977; Theriault et al. 1983; Edmonds et al.
1975, 1978) and evaluations of these studies  (Hatch et al.  1981,
Stallones 1987, Downs et al. 1977, The Vinyl Institute 1987)  have
investigated the effects of vinyl chloride exposure  on the  incidence of
fetal loss and birth defects. No solid association  has been  found.
Animal data identify a NOAEL for developmental toxicity  in  rabbits
exposed intermittently to 2,500 ppm  on days  6 to  18 of gestation  (John
et al. 1977). The same study identifies  intermittent exposure of mice at
50 ppm on days 6 to 15 of gestation  as a NOAEL. A NOAEL  for  rats  of
1,500 ppm exposed Intermittently on  10 days  of gestation was  identified
from a study by Ungvary et al.  (1978). The animal data are  depicted  in
Figs. 2.1 and 2.3.

-------
14   Section 2

     Two studies indicating subtle effects at unusually low exposure
levels  (Mirkova et al. 1978, Sal'nikova and Kitsovskaya 1980) were
insufficiently reported and judged to be inadequate for critical
evaluation.

     Reproductive toxlcity.  Two occupational studies associated effects
on sexual and endocrinological function in men and women and on
gynecological health in women with exposure to vinyl chloride (Makarov
1984, Makarov et al. 1984). Although exposure levels were estimated, the
reports were inadequately reported for critical evaluation, and the data
from these studies are not plotted on the graphs. In a 1-year study in
rats, intermittent exposure to 100 ppm was a LOAEL for testicular
effects and 10 ppm was a NOAEL (see Figs. 2.1 and 2.3) (Bi et al.,
1985).  In an earlier study, Torkelson et al. (1961) observed no effects
on relative testicular weight in rats exposed intermittently to 500 ppm
for 4.5 months or in dogs, rabbits, or guinea pigs exposed
intermittently to 200 ppm for 6 months. The quality of this study was
limited, however, because small numbers of animals were used.
     Genotoxicity.  Several studies reviewed in Sect. 4.3.5.1 on
genotoxicity in humans suggest that vinyl chloride causes chromosomal
aberrations in lymphocytes in occupationally exposed workers. The key
study (Hansteen et al. 1978) identified a NOAEL of 1 ppm for this
effect. Positive results were obtained in microorganisms in nonhuman
systems, in the recessive lethal test in Drosophila and in other
mammalian test systems (see Section 4.3.5.2 on genotoxicity in animals).
     Carcinogenicity.  Several epidemiology studies, many of which have
been reviewed by EPA (1985b), associated occupational exposure to vinyl
chloride with cancers of the liver and possibly of the brain.
Concentrations of vinyl chloride in the workroom air were not measured.
In the key studies used by EPA (1985b) to derive an inhalation potency
factor  (Haltoni et al. 1980, 1981), rats were exposed intermittently to
1 to 30,000 ppm for 52 weeks, and mice and hamsters were exposed to 50
to 30,000 ppm for 30 weeks followed by an observation period. Estimation
of carcinogenic potency was based on the incidence of liver
angiosarcomas in rats. A statistically significant increase in tumor
incidence was observed in all three species at i50 ppm. Several other
inhalation studies, reviewed in Sect. 4.3.6, Carcinogenicity, support
the Carcinogenicity of inhalation exposure to vinyl chloride-. Studies by
Suzuki  (1981, 1983) appear to define intermittent exposure of mice to
10 ppm as a level associated with increased incidence of lung cancer.
Mice were exposed for 4 weeks followed by a 41-week observation period.
The concentration of 50 ppm associated with cancer in rats and hamsters
and the concentration of 10 ppm associated with lung cancer in mice are
depicted in Figs. 2.1 and 2.3.

     From the incidence of liver angiosarcomas in rats of both sexes in
the Maltoni et al. (1980, 1981) experiments, and based upon the absorbed
doses of vinyl chloride, an upper bound q.* of 2.95 x 10'^ (mg/kg/day)'1
was estimated by EPA (1985b). Assuming humans breathe 20 m3/day, absorb
50% of inhaled vinyl chloride, and weigh 70 kg each, estimated
concentrations associated with cancer risks of 10'4, 10'5, 10'6, and
lO'7 are 9 x 10'4, 9 x 10'5, 9 x 10'6, and 9 x 10'7 ppm, respectively
(see Fig. 2.3).

-------
                                             Health Effects Summary   15

2.2.1.2  Oral

     Lethality and decreased longevity.  Oral lethality data are Limited
to an LD50 in rats of 500 mg/kg (Sax 1984) , and an effect level of
1.3 mg/kg/day and a .NOAEL of 0.13 mgAg/day in a lifetime dietary study
in rats (Til et al. 1983) (see Figs. 2.2 and 2.4).

     Systemic/target organ tozicity.  Oral toxicity data were not
located for humans. The liver appears to be the critical target organs
for animals orally exposed to vinyl chloride. In a 13-week gavage study
in rats, 300 mgAg/day was a LOAEL and 30 mgAg/day was a NOAEL for
hepatotoxicity (Feron et al. 1975) (see Figs. 2.2 and 2.4).  A minimal
risk level of 0.30 mgAg/day is estimated for intermittent oral exposure
based on the NOAEL of 30 mgAg/day (see Fig.  2.4). In a lifetime dietary
study in rats (Til et al. 1983),  a LOAEL of 1.3 mgAg/day and a NOAEL of
0.13 mgAg/day for hepatotoxicity were identified (see Figs. 2.2 and
2.4). A minimal risk level for chronic oral exposure is estimated from
the NOAEL of 0.13 mgAg/day for hepatotoxicity because this dose is also
a NOAEL for decreased longevity.  The minimal risk level is -0.0013
mgAg/day (see Fig. 2.4). Other effects observed in a lifetime dietary
study in rats by Feron et al. (1981) include mild hematological changes
at >14.1 mgAg/day, but not at 5.0 mgAg/day. These data are depicted in
Fig.  2.2,  but have no bearing on critical evaluation.

     Developmental tozicity.  Data were not located regarding
developmental toxicity in orally exposed humans or animals.
     Reproductive tozicity.   Data were not located regarding
reproductive toxicity in orally exposed humans or animals.
     Genotozicity.  See Sect. 2.2.1.1 on genotoxicity associated with
inhalation exposure.

     Carcinogenicity.   Data were not located regarding cancer in orally
exposed humans.  In the key lifetime dietary study in rats (Feron et al.
1981) used by EPA (1985a, 1987a)  to derive a potency estimate for oral
exposure,  rats were fed diets that provided vinyl chloride at doses of
1.8,  5.6,  or 17.0 mgAg/day for lifetime. An increased incidence of
neoplastic nodules of the liver and/or hepatocellular carcinoma,
statistically significant, was observed at >1.8 mgAg/day in females and
at >5.6 mgAg/day in males.  The lower dose is depicted in Fig. 2.4 as
the lowest dose in animals associated with cancer. EPA (1985a, 1987a)
estimated the upper-bound cancer potency at 2.3 (mgAg/day)'1 based on
the combined incidence of liver and lung tumors in both sexes of rats.
Doses associated with excess cancer risks of 10*^, 10'5, 10'6, and 10'7
are plotted in Fig. 2.4.

2.2.1.3  Dermal

     Pertinent data regarding toxicity in humans or animals dermally
exposed to vinyl chloride were not located in the available literature.

2.2.2  Biological Monitoring as a Measure of Exposure and Effects

     Biological monitoring for exposure to vinyl chloride has had
limited success.  In an early study, Baretta et al. (1969) attempted to
correlate  postexposure concentrations of vinyl chloride in exhaled air

-------
16   Section 2

with exposure levels. Although there was a very close relationship
between exposure levels >SO ppm and levels in expired air,  the method
does not appear to be useful at exposure concentrations <50 ppm.  Methods
have been devised to quantify vinyl chloride in urine (van Sittert and
de Jong 1985) and tissue (Zuccato et al. 1979),  but metabolism occurs so
quickly that quantification of levels of unchanged compound in urine is
not likely to reflect exposure levels,  particularly at low
concentrations.

     More recently, biological monitoring has focused on correlating
urinary levels of thiodiglycolic acid,  the major urinary metabolite of
vinyl chloride (Green and Hathway 1977), with exposure levels in the air
(Heger et al. 1982). The results, presented in Fig. 2.5, suggest a
reasonable correlation between exposure concentration and urinary output
of thiodiglycolic acid. In reviewing these data, however, Tarkowski
(1984) noted that a great deal of individual variation occurred,  and the
correlation was not strong enough to render this method reliable at
exposure concentrations of <5 ppm. Tarkowski (1984) concluded that no
reliable method exists for biological monitoring of exposure to vinyl
chloride.

     As indicated in Sect. 4.3.2.1, Hepatotoxicity, liver disease is
probably the most common adverse effect associated with exposure to
vinyl chloride.  Generally, routinely performed biochemical screening and
liver function screening tests have not been useful in monitoring the
presence, severity, or progress of vinyl chloride disease (Lee et al.
1977b, Lilis et al. 1975). More recently, Doss et al. (1984) measured
total urinary porphyrins and secondary urinary coproporphyrin in several
patients with liver disease resulting from exposure to vinyl chloride.
These investigators observed a correlation between slightly to
moderately elevated total urinary porphyrin and the early stages of
toxic liver disease. Particularly noted was a marked elevation in
urinary coproporphyrin. In cases of chronic liver disease,  total urinary
porphyrin was markedly elevated to 3 to 6 times the upper normal limit,
but coproporphyrin appeared to be elevated relatively less than was
observed for acute toxicity. The investigators observed that elevated
urinary coproporphyrin is a common clinical pathological finding in
vinyl-chloride-related liver disease and may be useful in monitoring
chronic exposure and progress of the clinical case, althoughvother liver
toxins and an inherited defect can also result in elevated urinary
porphyrin.

2.2.3  Environmental Levels a* Indicators of Exposure and Effects

2.2.3.1  Levels found in the environment

     Levels of vinyl chloride in environmental media are typically low
and, generally, are not likely to result in significant human exposure.
The most important medium for human exposure is air. Atmospheric levels
in most places are usually below the level of detection  (Stephens et al.
1986; Grimsrud and Rasmussen 1975a,b; Markov et al. 1984; Wallace et al.
1984; EPA 1985b). Levels from trace to  8.8 mg/m3  (3.4 ppm) have been
found near vinyl chloride production plants (Gordon and Keeks 1977,
Pellizzarl et al. 1979, IARC 1979, EPA  1985b), and levels have ranged
from undetectable to 30.8 Mg/m3  (0.012  ppm) over  landfills  (Stephens et

-------
                                                 Health Effects Suaaary
                                                              17
   11


   10


    9


3  8
E
I*

I  4
1  3
    2


    1  h


    0
•I
                       6    8    10    12   14   16    18   20   22   24

                        CONCENTRATION IN AIR (ppm)
    Fig. 2.5. Urinary output of thiodiglycolic acid from volunteers 12 h after exposure to vinyl
 chloride in air for 12 a. Source: Tarkowski 1984.

-------
 18   Section 2

 al.  1986,  Baker and Mackay 1985). Vinyl chloride in air over landfills
 may  originate from the disposal of vinyl chloride containing wastes or
 from the degradation of trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, or
 1,1,1-trichloroethane (HSDB 1987, Wilson and Wilson 1985, Smith and
 Dragun  1984). It  is unlikely that levels in ambient air would result in
 significant exposure.

     Several epidemiological studies associated occupational exposure
 with adverse health effects, including cancer; however, these studies
 (see Sect. 4, Toxicological Data) did not quantify exposure. A NIOSH
 survey  of  three vinyl chloride manufacturing plants reported a time-
 weighted average  concentration of 0.18 to 69 mg/m3 (0.07 to 27 ppm) in
 workplace  air (Fishbein 1979). Concentrations in some plants were as
 high as 100 to 800 mg/m3 (39 to 315 ppm) (Fishbein 1979). There seems
 little  doubt that occupational exposure remains the most important
 source  of  exposure to vinyl chloride.

     Levels in drinking water as high as 10 /ig/L have been detected
 (Dyksen and Hess  1982, HSDB 1987), but most monitoring studies have
 reported no detectable vinyl chloride in drinking water (HSDB 1987,
 Coniglio et al. 1980). Data were not located regarding the monitoring of
 vinyl chloride in soil, but exposure from contact with contaminated soil
 is likely  to be negligible because dermal absorption is not considered
 significant (Hefner et al. 1975a).
     In the past, vinyl chloride had been detected in various foods as a
 result of  migration from polyvinyl chloride food wrappings and
 containers (EPA 1985b). Currently, the FDA regulates the concentration
 of vinyl chloride monomer in polymers that contact food in order to
 restrict intake of vinyl chloride to safe levels.

 2.2.3.2  Human exposure potential

     Monitoring data indicate that people living in the vicinity of
 vinyl chloride, PVC, or vinyl chloride copolymer manufacturers, or
 hazardous waste sites that contain vinyl chloride, would be exposed to
 this compound through inhalation of contaminated air, whereas people not
 living near these sources would be exposed to negligible levels.
 Locations  of large industrial sources include, but are not limited to:
 Plaquemine, Louisiana; Houston, Texas; Lake Charles, Louisiana; Calvert
 City, Kentucky; Point Comfort. Texas; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Baton
 Rouge,  Louisiana; Delaware City, Delaware; Pensacola, Florida; and
 Aberdeen, Massachusetts (CMR 1986a,b). The greatest likelihood for human
 inhalation exposure to vinyl chloride is occupational. NIOSH estimated
 that 27,000 workers are definitely exposed to vinyl chloride and as many
 as 2.2 million workers may probably be exposed (Sittig 1985).
     The level of vinyl chloride in drinking water is expected to be
highest in areas where the raw water supplies are contaminated with
vinyl chloride. The most probable source of surface water contamination
 is wastewater from vinyl chloride, PVC, and vinyl chloride copolymer
manufacturers. The most probable sources of groundwater contamination
 are  landfills. It has been shown that use of PVC pipes may result  in
 leaching of vinyl chloride monomer into drinking water supplies;
however, the concentrations in drinking water that occur from these
pipes are below those expected to cause adverse health effects.

-------
                                             Health Effaces Summary    19

2.3  ADEQUACY OF DATABASE

2.3.1  Introduction
     Section 110 (3)  of SARA directs  the  Administrator of ATSDR to
prepare a toxicological profile for each  of the 100 most significant
hazardous substances  found at facilities  on the CERCLA National
Priorities List. Each profile must include the following content:

    "(A)  An examination, summary, and interpretation of available
          toxicological information and epidemiologic evaluations on  a
          hazardous substance in order to ascertain the levels of
          significant human exposure  for  the substance and the
          associated acute, subacute,  and chronic health effects.

     (B)  A determination of whether  adequate information on the health
          effects of each substance is available or in the process  of
          development to determine levels of exposure which present a
          significant risk to human health of acute, subacute, and
          chronic health effects.
     (C)  Where appropriate, an identification of toxicological testing
          needed to identify the types or levels of exposure that may
          present significant risk of adverse health effects in humans."

     This section identifies gaps in current knowledge relevant to
developing levels of significant exposure for vinyl chloride. Such  gaps
are identified for certain health effect end points (lethality,
systemic/target organ toxicity, developmental toxicity, reproductive
toxicity. and carcinogenicity) reviewed in Sect. 2.2 of this profile in
developing levels of significant exposure for vinyl chloride, and for
other areas, such as human biological monitoring and mechanisms of
toxicity. The present section briefly summarizes the availability of
existing human and animal data, identifies data gaps, and  summarizes
research in progress that may fill such gaps.
     Specific research programs for obtaining data needed  to develop
levels of significant exposure for vinyl chloride will be  developed by
ATSDR, NTP, and EPA in the  future.

2.3.2  Health Effect End Points

2.3.2.1  Introduction and graphic summary
     The availability of data for health effects  in humans and animals
is depicted on bar graphs  in Figs. 2.6 and  2.7,  respectively.

     The bars of full height indicate  that  there  are  data to  meet at
least one of the following  criteria:
  1.  For noncancer health  end points,  one or more  studies are available
     that meet  current scientific standards and are sufficient to define
     a  range of toxicity from no-effect  levels  (NOAELs)  to levels  that
     cause effects (LOAELs  or  FELs).

  2.  For human  carcinogenicity,  a substance is  classified as either  a
     "known human carcinogen"  or "probable  human carcinogen" by both EPA
     and  the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)

-------
                                             HUMAN  DATA
                                                                                                             SUFFICIENT
                                                                                                            INFORMATION*
                                                                                                                              ro
                                                                                                                              o
                                                                                                                             (t
                                                                                                                             n
§
                                                                                                          V    SOME
                                                                                                          ^INFORMATION
                                                                                                                 NO
                                                                                                            INFORMATION
                                                                                                   OHAL
                                                                                              INHALATION
                                                                                          DERMAL
HTMAIITT        ACUTI     IMTCMMEMATI    CHNOMC   DCVELOPMCNTAL  Mraooucnw  CAMCINOOCNKITV
           L	/    TOXICfTV       TOUCITY
                    •rsientc TOKICITT
                       Sufficient rtormation exials to meet at least one o( the criteria for cancer or noocancer and point*.

                       Fif. 2.6. Availability of informmioo on bealik effects of vfaiyl cUoride (bunun fata).

-------
                                           ANIMAL DATA
                                                                                                          SUFFICIENT
                                                                                                         INFORMATION*
                                                                                                     J
                                                                                                             SOME
                                                                                                         INFORMATION
                                                                                                               NO
                                                                                                          INFORMATION
                                                                                                ORAL
                                                                                           INHALATION
                                                                                      DERMAL
LETHALITY       ACUTE     INTERMEDIATE    CHRONIC   DEVELOPMENTAL REPRODUCTIVE  CARCINOOENICITr
           /	/    TOXICITV       TOXICITV
                     SYSTEMIC TOIICITV

                 'Sufficient information exists to meet at least one of the criteria for cancer or noncancer end points

                  Fig. 2.7.  Availability of information on health effects of vinyl chloride (animal data).
                                                                                                                          it
I
n
in
(ft

-------
22   Section 2

     (qualitative),  and the data are sufficient to derive a cancer
     potency factor (quantitative).
 3.  For animal carcinogenicity, a substance causes a statistically
     significant number of tumors in at least one species,  and the data
     are sufficient to derive a cancer potency factor.
 4.  There are studies that show that the chemical does not cause this
     health effect via this exposure route.
     Bars of half height indicate that "some" information for the end
point exists, but does not meet any of these criteria.
     The absence of a column indicates that  no information exists for
that end point and route.

2.3.2.2  Description* of highlights of graphs
     Figure 2.6 shows that human dose-response data for oral and dermal
exposure are lacking. Data are available that associate high inhalation
levels of vinyl chloride with mortality in acute occupational exposure,
but exposure levels were not quantified; therefore, the graphs indicate
"some" but not "adequate" data. Data were not located for acute or
intermediate inhalation exposure to vinyl chloride. Many epidemiological
studies and case studies have characterized the syndrome known as vinyl
chloride disease in occupationally exposed humans (see paragraph on
vinyl chloride disease from inhalation exposure, human, in Sect.
4.3.2.3). Several epidemiology studies have investigated the effects of
vinyl chloride exposure on the incidence of fetal loss and birth
defects. No solid association was found, and the date are considered
"inadequate" for developmental toxicity in humans. Two studies suggest
that occupational exposure interferes with normal sexual activity and
compromises gynecological health  (Hakarov 1984, Makarov et al. 1984).
These data are inadequately reported for critical evaluation, and,
consequently, the graph for reproductive toxicity indicates "some" data.
Although vinyl chloride is clearly a human carcinogen based on
occupational data (see Sect. 4.3.6.1 on carcinogenicity from inhalation
exposure, human), exposures were not quantified, and the data are
classified as "some."
     The lack of dermal data is not problematical since dermal
absorption of vinyl chloride vapor is expected to be insignificant
compared with inhalation absorption (Hefner et al. 1975a). Although
there is a lack of oral data in humans, data in  relevant animal models
are sufficient to estimate significant levels of exposure  for
intermediate and chronic oral exposure. Deficiencies in the human
inhalation toxicity data are somewhat more noteworthy because animal
data are sufficient for estimating a minimal risk level for  intermediate
duration but not for chronic inhalation exposure.
     From Fig. 2.7 it  is apparent that the database  for inhalation
exposure in animals is more extensive than for humans. Inhalation data
for acute lethality, intermediate duration toxicity, developmental
toxicity, and carcinogenicity are sufficient for critical  evaluation and
are defined as "adequate." Inhalation data for chronic systemic  toxicity
are inadequate for defining a range of  toxicity  and, therefore,  are
graphically depicted as  "some."

-------
                                              Health Effects Summary   23

      The oral database is more nearly complete. Data "adequate" for risk
 assessment are available for intermediate and chronic toxicity and
 carcinogenicity. However, acute lethality data, limited to an LD50 in
 rats (Sax 1984), were judged to be "some." Data were lacking for acute
 systemic, developmental, and reproductive toxicity. Since oral exposure
 is possible, the data gap regarding developmental and reproductive
 toxicity should be filled.

 2.3.2.3  Summary of relevant ongoing research

      Peter Foiles at the American Health Foundation in New York City
 will conduct a study sponsored by the National Cancer Institute to
 develop monoclonal antibodies that will aid in the detection of cyclic
 DNA adducts in humans exposed to environmental carcinogens.  The study
 may contribute to our knowledge of adducts that are formed in humans
 from vinyl chloride exposure and the role these adducts play in human
 carcinogenesis (NTIS 1987).

      Peter Guengerich at the Department of Biochemistry at Vanderbilt
 University in Nashville,  Tennessee,  will investigate the bioactivation
 and covalent binding of metabolites  of vinyl halides,  including vinyl
 chloride.  This work,  sponsored by the National Institute of
 Environmental Health Sciences,  may contribute to our understanding of
 the impact of specific enzymes in the liver and other organs to the
 toxification and detoxification-of vinyl chloride (NTIS 1987).

      D.P.  Brown at NIOSH in  Cincinnati,  Ohio,  is updating cohort
 mortality studies on several chemicals and mixtures,  including vinyl
 chloride.  It is  hoped that the updated studies may provide sufficient
 statistical  analyses  to provide more  definitive information regarding
 the association of vinyl  chloride  with various types of cancer (NTIS
 1987).

      J.R.  Giacin at Michigan State University has been investigating the
 migration  of monomers  in  plastics  into food stimulants.  This project,
 sponsored  by the  U.S.  Department of Agriculture,  may allow more accurate
 estimation of the exposure of the  population to vinyl  chloride  from
 foods packaged in plastic (NTIS 1987).

     According to Dow  Chemical  Co. (1988),  an update of the  Fox and
 Collier  (1977) British study of occupational exposure^ to vinyl  chloride
 is  imminent.

 2.3.3  Other  Information Needed for Human  Health Assessment

 2.3.3.1  Pharmacokinetics and mechanisms of  action

     The pharmacokinetics of vinyl chloride  in humans  exposed by
 inhalation is relatively well understood,  but  little  is  known of oral
 and dermal pharmacokinetics.  The gap  in human  pharmacokinetlc knowledge
 is not a concern because the pharmacokinetics  of oral vinyl  chloride  in
 relevant animal models  is well  understood, and dermal exposure  is  not
 likely to be significant. Metabolism  to an epoxide and  an aldehyde
provides reactive intermediates thought to be  responsible  for the
carcinogenicity and probably the hepatotoxicity of the  compound in

-------
24   Section 2

animals and humans. Further understanding of the mechanism of action on
other systems, such as the CNS, could be gained.

2.3.3.2  Monitoring of human biological camples

     The most practical biological monitoring procedure appears to be
quantification of urinary output of thiodiglycolic acid,  the predominant
urinary metabolite of vinyl chloride (Heger et al.  1982).  Individual
variation, however, renders this method unreliable at exposure
concentrations 
-------
                                                                      25
                 3.  CHEMICAL AMD PHYSICAL INFORMATION
3.1  CHEMICAL IDENTITY
     Data pertaining to the chemical identity of vinyl chloride are
listed in Table 3.1.
3.2  PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
     The physical and chemical properties of vinyl chloride are
presented in Table 3.2.

-------
26    Section  3
                      Table 3.1.  Chemical identity of rinyl chloride
                   Parameter
       Value
  References
       Chemical name

       Synonyms and trade names
      Chemical formula

      Wiswesser line notation
      Chemical structure
      Identification numbers
        CAS Registry No.
        NIOSH RTECS No.
        EPA Hazardous Waste No.
        OHM-TADS No.
        DOT/UN/NA/IMCO Shipping No.
        STCC No.
        Hazardous Substances Data Bank No.
        National Cancer Institute No.
Chloroethene

Vinyl chloride,
chloroethylene,
ethylene monochloride,
monochloroethylene,
VC,  VCM, vinyl
C monomer

C2HjCl

G1U1
SANSS 1987

SANSS 1987
 H
                                            \
                                                      Cl
                                             C = C
 H
                                                    \
                                                      H
75-01-4
KU962SOOO
U043
7216947
1086
49 057 92
169
None available
HSDB 1987

HSDB 1987
HSDB 1987
HSDB 1987
HSDB 1987
HSDB 1987
HSDB 1987
HSD&1987
HSDB 1987

-------
                                    Chemical  and Physical  Information    27
           Table 3.2. Physical and chemical properties of vinyl chloride
Property
Molecular weight
Color
Physical state
Odor
Odor threshold
Water
Air
Melting point
Boiling point
Autoigmtion temperature
Solubility
Water
Value
62.5
Colorless
Gas
Mild, sweet
3 4 ppm (w/v)
3.000 ppm (v/v)
-153 8°C
-134°C
472°C
2.763 mg/L at 25°C
References
Cowfer and Magistro 1983
Cowfer and Magistro 1983
Cowfer and Magistro 1983
Verschueren 1983
A moo re and Hautula 1983
Amoore and Hautula 1983
Cowfer and Magistro 1983
Cowfer and Magistro 1983
Cowfer and Magistro 1983
EPA 1985b
  Organic solvents
Density, g/cm3
Vapor density (air = 1)
Log octanol-water
partition coefficients
Vapor pressure
Henry's law constant
Refractive index
Flashpoint
Flammability limits
Conversion factors
  ppm (v/v) to mg/m1
  in air
  mg/m1 to ppm (v/v)
  in air
1.100 mg/L at 25°C
Soluble in hydrocarbons,
oil, alcohol, chlorinated
solvents, and most common
organic liquids
0.969 (-14.2°C)
2.15

1.36
2,660 mm Hg at 25°C
1.2 (atm-m3)/mol at 10°C
1.3700 at 20° C
— 77.75 (open cup)
4-22 vol %

ppm  (v/v) =  2.60 mg/m3

mg/m3 — 0.39 ppm (v/v)
Cowfer and Magistro 1983
Cowfer and Magistro 1983
Cowfer and Magistro 1983
Verschueren 1983

EPA 1987b
Verschueren 1983
EPA I985b
EPA 1985b
Cowfer and Magistro 1983
Cowfer and Magistro 1983

-------
                                                                       29
                          4.   TOZICOLOGICAL DATA

 4.1  OVERVIEW

      Much of the  data  summarized  in  this section  is  reviewed  in  two
 recent  EPA documents (EPA 1985a,b).  Respiratory and  gastrointestinal
 absorption of vinyl chloride  appears to be rapid.  In one briefly
 reported study  it was  estimated that humans retain -42% of vinyl
 chloride inhaled  at concentrations of 3 to 24 ppm. Animal studies
 suggest that gastrointestinal absorption is nearly complete.  Dermal
 absorption of vinyl chloride  vapors  is not likely to result in toxicity.
 Distribution of absorbed  vinyl chloride may be  widespread, with  highest
 levels  of parent  compound located in fat;  but metabolism and  excretion
 occur so rapidly  that  highest levels of excretory products are located
 in  the  liver and  kidney,  the  primary organs of  metabolism and excretion.
      Regardless of the route  of administration, inhalation or oral,
 metabolism proceeds via oxidation and subsequent  conjugation  with
 sulfhydryl groups. An  important oxidative  pathway involves mixed-
 function oxidase  and results  in reactive electrophilic intermediates,
 2-chloroethylene  oxide and 2-chloroacetaldehyde,  which bind to liver
 macromolecules  and may be responsible for  the toxicity and oncogenicity
 associated with vinyl  chloride. Excretion  of polar metabolites is
 predominantly through  the urine;  when metabolic pathways are  saturated,
 substantial amounts of unmetabolized vinyl chloride  are exhaled.

      At  sublethal doses,  the  liver is the  primary target organ for
 carcinogenic  and  noncarcinogenie  effects of vinyl chloride in humans and
 animals.  The  significant  feature  of  the toxicity  of  vinyl chloride is
 its carcinogenicity. In occupationally exposed humans and in  animals
 exposed  orally or by inhalation,  an  increased incidence of liver and
 brain tumors, and possibly other  types of  tumors,  can be attributed to
 vinyl chloride. Other  symptoms in occupationally  exposed humans  are
 collectively  termed "vinyl chloride  disease," and include
 acroosteolysis, circulatory disturbance in the extremities, Raynaud
 syndrome,  scleroderma,  hematological effects, and effects on  the lungs,
 as well  as  effects on  the liver.  No  counterpart of the human  disease has
 been produced in experimental animals.

      In  occupationally exposed humans, vinyl chloride is genotoxic. This
 effect is  associated with an  increase in chromosomal aberrations in
 peripheral  lymphocytes, and it appears to  be reversible when  exposures
 are reduced to Si ppm.  Vinyl chloride is mutagenic in a number of
microbial  and other test systems.  Electrophilic metabolites of vinyl
 chloride,  2-chloroethylene oxide  and 2-chloroacetaldehyde, have  been
 shown to bind to macromolecules.  2-Chloroethylene  oxide forms adducts
with DNA. These mechanisms may explain the  toxicity  and carcinogenicity
of vinyl chloride.

-------
 30   Section 4

 4.2  TOXICOKINETICS

 4.2.1  Absorption

 4.2.1.1  Inhalation

      Human.   Krajewski  et  al.  (1980) exposed young male volunteers to
 vinyl chloride monomer  concentrations of 7.5 to 60 mg/m3 (3 to 24 ppm)
 by gas mask  for 6 h.  The authors did not report whether steady state had
 been achieved,  and the  data were inadequate to determine this point.
 Retention was estimated by measuring the difference between inhaled and
 exhaled concentrations. Retention reached a maximum within 15 min and
 declined rapidly after  30  min  of exposure, after which it increased to a
 relatively constant value. An  average retention of 42% was estimated.
 Although the results  varied among the individuals tested, the percentage
 retained appeared to  be independent of the concentration inhaled.

      Animal.   Animal  data, while demonstrating that inhalation
 absorption of vinyl chloride occurs readily and rapidly, are not
 sufficient to quantitatively determine the proportion of an inhaled dose
 that is absorbed.  Withey (1976) determined that peak blood levels
 occurred at  30  min in rats exposed head only to 7,000 ppm.  Bolt et al.
 (1977)  placed rats that had been pretreated with 6-nitro-l,2,3-
 benzothiadiazole to completely block the metabolism of vinyl chloride in
 a closed chamber containing 0.4 to 0.5 ppm 14C-vinyl chloride.
 Radioactivity in the  chamber air declined only for the first 15 min of
 exposure,  indicating  that  equilibrium between atmospheric and tissue
 levels  of radioactivity had occurred, suggesting rapid uptake by the
 tissues of the  rats.

 4.2.1.2  Oral

      Human.   Data regarding the oral absorption of vinyl chloride by
 humans  were  not located.

      Animal.   Several studies  in rats indicate that vinyl chloride is
 rapidly and  probably  completely absorbed from the gastrointestinal
 tract.  Withey (1976)  administered single 10 mL (44 to 92 mg/kg) oral
 doses of vinyl  chloride in aqueous solution and observed that blood
 levels  of vinyl chloride peaked in 10 to 20 min. Vatanabe et al. (1976a)
 administered single gavage doses of 0.05, 1, and 100 mgAg 14C-vinyl
 chloride  in  corn oil  and measured the amount of radioactivity excreted
 in expired air,  urine,  and feces, as well as the amount retained in the
 carcass,  at  72  h.  The fraction of the administered dose recovered in the
 feces,  roughly  indicative of the proportion unabsorbed, ranged from
 0.47  to 2.39%,  suggesting  that absorption was nearly complete. Total
 recovery,  however,  ranged from 82.3 to 91.3%, suggesting substantial
 loss  of radioactivity.  Feron et al. (1981) provided rats with diets
 containing nominally  20, 60, or 200 ppm vinyl chloride monomer (from
 powdered  polyvinyl chloride containing a high level of the monomer) for
 4 h and measured the  fecal excretion of vinyl chloride over 23 h from
 the start  of  the  feeding period. Fecal excretion accounted for 8, 10,
and 17% of the  vinyl chloride  present in the low, middle, and high
diets,  respectively. The investigators hypothesized that the vinyl
chloride  recovered from the feces was encapsulated by polyvinyl chloride

-------
                                                  Toxicological Data   31

 and was not available to the rats for absorption, and that absorption of
 available vinyl chloride was virtually complete.

 4.2.1.3  Dermal

      Human.  Data regarding the dermal absorption of vinyl chloride by
 humans were not located.

      Animal.  Animal data suggest that dermal absorption of vinyl
 chloride gas is not likely to be Significant. Hefner et al. (1975a)
 placed all but the heads of two anesthetized rhesus monkeys in chambers
 containing 800 or 7,000 ppm 14C-vinyl chloride for 2.5 or 2 h,
 respectively,  to measure the uptake  of radioactivity.  On the basis  of
 vinyl chloride measured in expired air and radioactivity measured in
 selected tissues,  the investigators  estimated dermal absorption of  0.031
 and 0.023% of  the available vinyl chloride at 800 and 7,000 ppm,
 respectively.  The investigators concluded that dermal absorption was far
 less significant than inhalation absorption.

 4.2.2  Distribution

 4.2.2.1  Inhalation

      Human.  Data  regarding the distribution of vinyl chloride  in the
 tissues of humans  exposed by inhalation were not located.

      Animal.   Data from rat studies  suggest that the distribution of
 Inhaled vinyl  chloride  is rapid and  widespread but  depends on
 metabolism.  Buchter et  al.  (1977)  exposed rats to 14C-vinyl chloride to
 determine  tissue distribution of radioactivity.  In  rats  pretreated  with
 6-nitro-l,2,3-benzothiadiazole  to  block metabolism  of vinyl chloride,
 the highest  levels of radioactivity  were  located in the  fat,  with lesser
 amounts in the blood, liver,  kidney,  muscle,  and spleen. When metabolism
 was not blocked, the  highest levels  of  radioactive  metabolites  were
 located in the liver  and kidney. At  10  mln after a  5-min exposure of
 rats  to 20,000 ppm ^C-vlnyl chloride,  Duprat et al.  (1977)  detected
 radioactivity  in the  liver,  bile duct,  digestive tract,  and kidney.  At
 3 h after  the exposure described above, radioactivity  was  also  detected
 in the  urinary tract, salivary  and lacrlmal glands,  thymus,  and skin.
 Immediately after  a 5-h  exposure to  14C-vinyl chloride, at  50 ppm, tissue
 levels  of  radioactivity,  expressed as percent incorporated per  gram of
 tissue, were highest  In  the  kidney (2.13%)  and liver (1.86%), with  lower
 levels  In  the spleen  (0.73%)  and brain  (0.17%)  (Bolt et  al.  1976a).
Watanabe et al. (1976b)  exposed rats  to 10 or 100 ppm  14C-vlnyl chloride
 for 6 h and measured  radioactivity in tissues  72 h  later.  In order  of
decreasing concentration, radioactivity (present as  nonvolatile
metabolites) was detected in  the liver, kidney,  skin,  lung,  muscle
carcass, plasma, and  fat.

4.2.2.2  Oral

     Human.  Data regarding the tissue distribution  of vinyl  chloride in
orally exposed humans were not located.

     Animal.  Watanabe et al. (1976a) measured the level of
radioactivity present as nonvolatile  metabolites in  tissues  of rats  72 h

-------
32   Section 4

after single 0.05 to 100-mg/kg gavage doses of 14C-vinyl chloride In
corn oil. Highest levels occurred in the liver,  -2 to 5 tines higher
than in the other tissues examined (skin,  plasma,  nuscle,  lung,  fat,  and
carcass).

4.2.2.3  Dermal

     Data regarding the distribution of vinyl chloride following dermal
exposure of humans or experimental animals were  not  located.

4.2.3  Metabolism

4.2.3.1  Inhalation
     Human.  In the only human data located,  Sabadie et al.  (1980)
examined the ability of aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase in the  S-9  fraction
from surgically obtained liver specimens to metabolize vinyl chloride to
electrophiles mutagenic to Salmonella cyphiaurium TA1530.  The number of
revertants per plate were compared with that resulting from  identically
prepared S-9 fractions from female strain BD IV rats. Human  S-9
fractions induced mutations (and presumably metabolism to a  reactive
electrophile) to an average 84% of the extent mediated by rat S-9, but a
ninefold individual variation was observed.
     Animal.  Hefner et al. (197Sb) exposed rats to  vinyl chloride in a
closed chamber at concentrations of -SO to 1,000 ppm for 52.5 to
356.3 min. Additional rats pretreated with ethanol (to inhibit alcohol
dehydrogenase activity) or SKF 525-A (to inhibit microsomal  oxidase
activity) were similarly exposed. Metabolism, estimated by measuring the
rate of disappearance of vinyl chloride from the closed system,  appeared
to follow first-order kinetics with a half-life of 86 min at <100 ppm.
At >220 ppm, metabolism was slowed to a half-life of 261 min, suggesting
saturation of the pathway predominant at <100 ppm. Pretreatment with
ethanol depressed the rate of metabolism >83% at <100 ppm but <47% at
>1,000 ppm. Pretreatment with SKF 525-A, however,  had no effect at
<100 ppm but depressed metabolism 19% at >1,000 ppm. The authors
postulated three alternative pathways for metabolism, as depicted in
Fig. 4.1. At low concentrations, sequential oxidation to 2-
chloroethanol, 2-chloroacetaldehyde, and 2-chloroacetic acid involving
alcohol dehydrogenase (inhibited by pretreatment with ethanol) appeared
to be the predominant pathway. Little 2-chloroacetic acid was formed,
however, probably because 2-chloroacetaldehyde conjugated rapidly with
ubiquitous sulfhydryl groups. When the alcohol dehydrogenase pathway
became saturated, 2-chloroethanol may have been oxidized by catalase in
the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H202) to a peroxide, which may have
undergone subsequent dehydration to form 2-chloroacetaldehyde. An
alternative pathway may have involved oxidation by mixed-function
oxidase to form a highly reactive epoxide Intermediate, 2-chloroethylene
oxide, which spontaneously rearranged to form 2-chloroacetaldehyde.
Hefner et al. (1975b) reported urinary excretion of polar metabolites
and 2-chloroacetic acid by rats exposed by inhalation.
     Other animal data expand the hypotheses of Hefner et al. (1975b).
Hultmark et al. (1979) used an in vitro technique to determine that
metabolism was NADPH-dependent, located in the microsomal fraction of

-------
                                          Toxlcologlcal Data   33
  CIMC • CH n
 VNYL CHLORDE
       I
 CIH2C - CH2OH
 2-CHLOROETHANOL
MIXED FUNCTION
   OXIDASE
      H2O2
    CATALASE
         ALCOHOL
         DEHYDROGENASE
        O
       /\
^   H2C - CH

          Cl
 2-CHLOROETHYLENE OXIDE
                     CIH2C - CH2OOH

                     2-CHLOROETHYL-
                      HYOROPEROXIDE
   CIH2C - CHO
2-CHLOROACETALDEHYDE
    CIH2C - COOH
   2-CHLOROACETIC AGO
             Flf.4.1.
    •etebdk ptfkwiyi for riayi

-------
34   Section 4

the liver, and probably involved mixed-function oxidase.  Bolt et al.
(1977) reported that pretreataent with 6-nitro-1.2,3-benzothiadiazole
was sufficient to totally block metabolism of vinyl chloride in rats
exposed to -0.45 ppm in a closed system for 5 h.  Bolt et  al. (1977) and
Bolt (1986) interpreted this observation to strongly suggest that
metabolism of vinyl chloride proceeds primarily through a mixed-function
oxidase pathway with likely production of an epoxide intermediate,
because 6-nitro-l,2,3-benzothiadiazole is known to inhibit some
microsomal cytochrome P-450 oxidation pathways.  Bolt et al.  (1977)  and
Filser and Bolt (1979) exposed rats in a closed system to 100 or
1.000 ppm 14C-vinyl chloride. By measuring the disappearance of
radioactivity with time, they determined 250 ppm to be the threshold  at
which saturation of metabolic pathways occurs. A metabolic rate (Vmax)
of 110 jimol/h/kg was estimated for rats. In a similar experiment in
rhesus monkeys, metabolic saturation was observed to occur at 200 ppm,
with a Vmax of SO /jmol/hAg (Buchter et al. 1980). The Vmax of
SO pmol/h/kg was suggested as a closer approximation of metabolism in
humans than the value of 110 pmol/h/kg estimated for rats by Filser and
Bolt (1979).

     Inhalation exposure has been associated with reduction in liver
nonprotein sulfhydryl concentration in the rat (Hefner et al. 1975b,
Bolt et al. 1976b) , particularly at exposure concentrations >100 ppm
(Watanabe et al. 1978a, Jedrychowski et al. 1984). Urinary metabolites
identified in rats exposed by inhalation include polar compounds
resulting from conjugation with sulfhydryl groups at low exposure
concentrations (Vatanabe et al. 1976b, Hefner et al. 1975b) and
2-chloroacetic acid at high exposure concentrations (Hefner et al.
1975b).

     Several investigators have observed the binding of nonvolatile
metabolites of 14C-vinyl chloride to liver macromolecules in vitro and
in rats exposed by inhalation (Kappus et al. 1976; Guengerich and
Watanabe 1979; Guengerich et al. 1979, 1981; Vatanabe et al. 1978a,b).
In single-exposure experiments at different concentrations, the extent
of macromolecular binding increased proportionately to the amount of
vinyl chloride metabolized and disproportionately to the exposure
concentration (Vatanabe et al. 1978a). The extent of macromolecular
binding was increased by repeated exposure to vinyl chloride (Vatanabe
et al. 1978b) and by pretreatment with phenobarbltal (Guengerich and
Vatanabe 1979). Macromolecular binding has been attributed to the
reactive intermediate 2-chloroethylene oxide, which may bind to DNA and
RNA, and to its rearrangement product, 2-chloroacetaldehyde, which may
bind to protein molecules (Guengerich et al. 1979, 1981;  Guengerich and
Vatanabe 1979; Vatanabe et al. 1978a,b; Kappus et al. 1976; Bolt 1986).

4.2.3.2  Oral

     Human.  Data regarding the metabolism of vinyl chloride by orally
exposed humans were not located.

     Animal.  Urinary metabolites identified from rats orally exposed to
14C-vinyl chloride are consistent with the metabolic pathways postulated
for inhalation exposure, in particular with the formation of
2-chloroethylene oxide and 2-chloroacetaldehyde. Metabolites identified

-------
                                                  Toxicologlcal Data   35

 include N-acetyl-S-(2-hydroxyethyl)cysteine, N-acetyl-S-(2-
 chloroethyDcysteine, 2-chloroacetic acid, thlodlglycolic acid, and
 glutamic acid (Watanabe et ml. 1976a; Vatanabe and Gehrlng 1976; Green
 and Hathway 1975, 1977). Metabolic saturation appears to occur with a
 single gavage dbse'of >1 and <100 mgAg/day (Watanabe et ml. 1976a).

 4.2.3.3  Dermal

      Data regarding metabolism In humans or animals dermally exposed to
 vinyl chloride were not located.

 4.2.4  Excretion

 4.2.4.1  Inhalation

      Human.   Human data suggest that exhalation of unmetabollzed vinyl
 chloride Is  not an Important pathway of elimination at low exposure
 concentrations  Krajewski  et ml.  (1980) exposed humans to  air containing
 7.5 to 60 mg/mj for 6 h and measured the mean  concentration in expired
 air for 30 min at termination of  exposure.  Mean concentrations in
 expired air  ranged f i jm undetectable to 2.84 mg/m3,  representing up to
 3.60 to 4.73%  of the inhaled concentration.

      In a study available  as a brief abstract,  Shu et ml.  (1986)
 reported that  urinary concentration of  thiodlglycolic acid increased
 with Increasing air  concentration of vinyl  chloride in an  occupational
 setting.  Urinary concentrations of thiodiglycolic acid peaked within
 20  h.  The investigators  suggested that  daily urinary output of
 thiodiglycolic  acid  might  be  a satisfactory biological index of exposure
 to  vinyl  chloride.

     Animal.  The  mode of  excretion of  vinyl chloride and  its
 metabolites  following inhalation  exposure of animals to  different
 concentrations  reflects  the  saturation  of metabolic  pathways  at low
 concentrations discussed in  Sect.  4.2.3.1,  in the subsection  on
 metabolism in animals after  inhalation  exposure.  The cumulative
 excretion of radioactivity over a 72-h  postexposure  period  was  measured
 in  rats exposed  to 10 or 1,000  ppm (Watanabe and  Gehring 1976,  Watanabe
 et  ml.  1976b) or 5,000 ppm (Watanabe  et  ml. 1978b)  14C-vinyl  chloride
 for 6 h. Radioactivity expired  as  C02 or vinyl chloride, excreted In the
 urine and feces, and  retained  in  the  carcass was  expressed  as a
 percentage of the total  radioactivity recovered.  The  results  presented
 in  Table 4.1 suggest  that metabolism was nearly complete at 10  ppm,
 because <2% of the recovered radioactivity occurred  as unchanged parent
 compound. The predominant route for excretion of  radioactive  metabolites
 was through the urine, accounting  for -70% of the recovered
 radioactivity. Metabolism appeared to be saturated at  1,000 ppm, since
 unchanged vinyl chloride increased to 12.3% and urinary  radioactivity
 decreased to 56.3%. At 5,000 ppa,  more than half  the  recovered
 radioactivity appeared as unchanged vinyl chloride, and urinary
 excretion accounted for -27% of the recovered activity. Generally,  there
was little change in the proportion of recovered radioactivity excreted
 in  the feces  or exhaled as C02. The percentage of the radioactivity
 retained in the carcass and tissues appeared to be somewhat decreased at

-------
36    Section
                    Table 4.1. Excretion of radioactivity in rats exposed to
                               "C-vinyl chloride in air for 6 h
                                         Radioactivity expressed as percent
                                                 of total recovered

Expired vinyl chloride
Expired CO2
Urine
Feces
Carcass and tissues
10
1.61
12.09
67.97
4.45
13.84
Exposure concentration (ppm)
1.000
12.26
12.30
56.29
4.21
14.48
5,000
54.5
8.0
27.1
3.2
7.3
               Source: Watanabe and Gehring 1976; Watanabe et al. 1976b, 1978b.

-------
                                                 Toxicologlcal Data   37

5,000 ppm conpared with 10 and 1,000 ppn,  suggesting preferential
retention of metabolites rather than unchanged vinyl chloride.

     Pulmonary excretion of unaltered vinyl chloride appeared to follow
first-order kinetics-regardless of exposure concentrations, with half-
lives of 20.4, 22.4, and 30 min at 10, 1,000,  and 5,000 ppm. The urinary
excretion of radioactivity was biphasic,  with the second or slow phase
accounting for <3% of the total urinary excretion. Half-lives for the
rapid (first-order) phase were estimated at 4.6, 4.1, and 4.5 h,
respectively. Urinary metabolites included N-acetyl-S-(2-
hydroxyethyl)cysteine, thiodiglycolic acid, and possibly S-(2-
hydroxye thy1)cys te ine.

4.2.4.2  Oral
     Human.  Data regarding the excretion of vinyl chloride by orally
exposed humans were not located.
     Animal.  In experiments in the United States (Vatanabe et al.
1976a, Vatanabe and Gehring 1976) and Great Britain (Green and Hathway
1975), which studied the similarities of pharmacokinetics following
inhalation and oral exposure, single oral doses of ^C-vinyl chloride
were administered to rats, and the excretion of radioactivity was
monitored over a 72-h period. Details are presented in Table 4.2. A
striking increase in exhalation of unchanged vinyl chloride and
compensatory decreases in urinary and fecal excretion of radioactivity
and exhalation of C02 were observed at 220 mg/kg, suggesting that
metabolic saturation had occurred at that dosage. At £l.O mg/kg, the
predominant route of elimination was urinary excretion of polar
metabolites.
     Exhalation of unchanged vinyl chloride was generally complete
within 3 to 4 h, but excretion of metabolites continued for days (Green
and Hathway 1975). Pulmonary excretion of vinyl chloride appeared to be
monophasic at 97% of total urinary  radioactivity
and having half-lives of 4.5 to 4.6 h for dosages of 0.05  to 100 mg/kg-
     Metabolites identified in the urine of orally treated rats were
consistent with the formation of 2-chloroethylene oxide and 2-
chloroacetaldehyde (Vatanabe et al. 1976a, Green  and Hathway  1977), as
postulated for metabolism following inhalation  exposure. The major
metabolite was Identified as thiodiglycolic acid; nearly equivalent
amounts of N-acetyl-S-(2-hydroxyethyl)cysteine  were  identified  (Vatanabe
et al. 1976a, Green and Hathway 1975). Smaller  amounts of  radlolabeled
S-(2-chloroethyl)cysteine, urea, glutamlc acid, and 2-chloroacetic acid
were also identified  (Green and Hathvay 1975).

4.2.4.3  Dermal
     Data regarding the metabolism of vinyl chloride  following  dermal
exposure of humans or animals were not located.

-------
38    Section 4
                    Table 4.2. Percent of administered dose of radioactivity
                          excreted 72 h following a single oral dose
                                 of 14C-vinyl chloride in rats
Dose (nig/ kg)

Expired
As vinyl chloride
AsCO2
Urine
Feces
Carcass
Total
0.05"
1.43
8.96
68.34
2.39
10.13
91.25
0.25*
37
135
75.1
4.6
NRf
96.9
1.0"
2.13
13.26
59.30
2.20
11.10
88.83
20-
41.6
4.8
22.6
1.0
11.0
81.0
100s
66.64
2.52
10.84
0.47
1.83
82.30
450*
91.9
0.7
5.4
0.7
NR
98.7
               " Watanabe and Gehnng 1976. Watanabe et al. 1976a.
               *Green and Hathaway 1975.
               fNot reported.

-------
                                                 Toxicologies! Data   39

4.2.4.4  Parenteral

     Human.  Data regarding the metabolism of parenterally administered
vinyl chloride in humans were not located.

     Animal.  The elimination of radioactivity following intraperitoneal
administration of ^C-vinyl chloride to rats resembles the pattern
observed following inhalation and oral administration. Following an
intraperitoneal dose of 0.25 mg/kg,  exhalation of unchanged vinyl
chloride, exhalation of C02, and urinary and fecal excretion of
radioactivity accounted for 43.2, 11.0, 43.1, and 1.8% of the
administered dose, respectively (Green and Hathway 1975). At 450 mg/kg,
exhaled vinyl chloride increased to 96.2% of the administered dose, CO2
decreased to 0.7%, urinary radioactivity decreased to 2.6%, and fecal
radioactivity remained unchanged.

     Small doses administered intravenously were eliminated very rapidly
and almost entirely by exhalation of unchanged vinyl chloride. Green and
Hathway (1975) administered a 0.25-mg/kg intravenous dose of 14C-vinyl
chloride to rats and recovered 80% of the dose within 2 min and 99%
within 1 h as unchanged compound from expired air.

4.3  TOXICITY

4.3.1  Lethality and Decreased Longevity

4.3.1.1  Inhalation

     Human.  ACGIH (1986a) and EPA (1985a) reviewed early reports of
acute toxicity at high levels resulting in lethality among
occupationally exposed workers. Deaths appeared to be due to narcosis.
Exposure levels were not reported, and an LCLO cannot be identified.
     Animal.  Patty et al. (1930) reported that narcosis and death
occurred within 30 to 60 min in guinea pigs exposed to 10% vinyl
chloride (100,000 ppm).  EPA (1985a)  reviewed a number of acute studies
in animals and reported 2-h LC50 values ranging from 117,500 ppm for
mice to 230,800 ppm for rabbits. Mastromatteo et al. (1960) exposed
rats, mice, and guinea pigs (five per sex per group) to 10, 20, 30, or
40% (guinea pigs only) vinyl chloride in air (100,000, 200,000, 300,000,
or 400,000 ppm) for 30 min. One guinea pig exposed to 40% died; all
mice, rats, and one guinea pig exposed to 30% died; one mouse but no
rats or guinea pigs exposed to 20% died.

     Long-term studies in rats and mice associate intermittent exposure
to 50 ppm with decreased longevity.  Lee et al. (1977a, 1978) exposed
rats and mice (36 per sex per species) to 0, 50, 250, or 1,000 ppm, 6
h/day, 5 days/week for up to 12 months. Acute lethality associated with
toxic hepatitis and tubular necrosis of the renal cortex occurred  in
mice after 5 to 9 days at 1,000 ppm. Shortened life span attributed to
nonearcinogenic effects of vinyl chloride occurred in all exposed groups
of both species. In a subsequent study. Hong et al. (1981) exposed mice
(8 to 28 per sex per group) and rats (4 to 16 per sex per group) to 0,
50, 250, or 1,000 ppm, 6 h/day, 5 days/week for up to 6 months (mice) or
10 months (rats), followed by a 12-month observation period. A decrease
in longevity related to concentration and duration of exposure was

-------
40   Section 4

observed in both species at all exposure concentrations,  which was
attributed to a combination of systemic toxicity and tumor development.

4.3.1.2  Oral
     Human.  Data regarding reduced longevity in humans orally exposed
to vinyl chloride were not located.

     Animal.  Sax (1984) reported an oral LD50 in rats of 500 mg/kg-  The
key lifetime oral study is that submitted by Til et al.  (1983),  in which
male and female Uistar rats were fed diets containing polyvinyl chloride
with a high level of the monomer. Dietary intakes of vinyl chloride
monomer were estimated at 0, 0.014, 0.13, and 1.3 mg/kg/day.  Groups
consisted of 100 rats per sex except for the high group,  which contained
SO rats per sex. Mortality was slightly but significantly increased in
high-group rats, starting at 68 weeks of treatment. No effects on
longevity were observed at <0.13 mg/kg/day, which is considered the
NOAEL for decreased survival.-

     An earlier lifetime study in rats from this laboratory (Feron et
al. 1981) supports the NOAEL for reduced survival of 0.13 mg/kg/day.
In chis experiment, diets containing polyvinyl chloride with high
levels of vinyl chloride monomer provided intakes of 0,  1.7,  5.0, or
14.1 mg/kg/day. A marked and statistically significant increase in
mortality occurred at >5.0 mg/kg/day. Females at 1.7 mg/kg/day had-a
slight but not statistically significant increase in mortality.

4.3.1.3  Dermal

     Data regarding lethality or reduced longevity in dermally exposed
humans or animals were not located in the available literature.

4.3.2  Systemic/Target Organ Toxicity

4.3.2.1  Hepatotoxicity

     Inhalation, human.  Several epidemiologic studies have associated
occupational exposure with impaired liver function and/or biochemical or
histological evidence of liver damage (Berk 1976, Buchancova et al.
1985, Gedigk et al. 1975, Marsteller et al. 1975, Popper and Thomas
1975, Doss et al. 1984, Lilis et al. 1975, Tamburro 1984, Taaburro et
al. 1984). Several of these studies have been reviewed by EPA (1985a,b).
Thresholds for hepatotoxicity cannot be identified, because data
regarding exposure concentrations and duration were not available.
Negative results, however, were reported in liver status screening
studies in 422 exposed and 202 control workers in one large vinyl
chloride manufacturing and polymerization plant (Lee et al. 1977).

     Inhalation, animal.  In the Lee et al. (1977a) study described in
Sect. 4.3.1.1, in the subsection on lethality and decreased longevity in
animals after inhalation exposure, acute hepatotoxicity was observed in
mice dying after intermittent exposure to 1,000 ppm vinyl chloride for
5 to 9 days.

     In an intermediate-length animal inhalation study (Torkelson et al.
1961), several species were exposed Intermittently for up to 6 months,
as detailed in Table 4.3. Air-exposed controls were maintained.

-------
                                                   roxicologlcal Data    41
   Table 4.3. Experimental protocol for animal exposure to rinyl chloride
Number of
animals/group

Species
Rats



Guinea pigs
Rabbits
Dogs

Males
10
20-24
5
10
10-12
3
1

Females
10
24
0
0
8-12
3
1
Dose of
vinyl chloride
(ppm)
500
50, 100, or 200
100 or 200
50
50, 100, or 200
50, 100, or 200
50. 100, or 200
Exposure
schedule"
(hours/day)
7
7
0.5, 1,2, or 4
1. 2. or 4
7
7
7
Exposure
duration
(months)
4.5
6
6
6
6
6
6
"All animals were exposed 5 days/week.
Source: Torkelson et al. 1961.

-------
42   Section 4

Parameters of liver toxicicy evaluated included gross and
histopathologic examination, measurement of relative organ weights,  and
determination of serum levels of enzymes associated with liver damage.
Biochemical parameters of liver status were within normal limits at  all
exposure concentrations, but histopathologic lesions occurred in rats
exposed to 500 ppm and in rabbits exposed to 200 ppm. Elevated relative
liver weights appeared to be the most sensitive indicator of
hepatotoxicicy and were observed in rats at 100 ppm, 7 h/day, but not at
50 ppm by the same schedule. In a study designed primarily to evaluate
effects on the testis (see Sect. 4.3.4.1, in the subsection on
reproductive toxicity in animals after inhalation exposure), Bi et al.
(1985) reported a concentration*related and significant elevation in
relative liver weight in rats exposed to 10, 100, or 3,000 ppm, 6 h/day,
6 days/week for 6 months. The 10-ppm concentration is considered a LOAEL
for liver effects in intermediate-length exposures. The longer-term
study by Lee et al. (1977a) in which rats and mice were exposed to 0,
50, 250, or 1,000 ppm, 6 h/day, 5 days/week for up to 12 months (Sect.
4.3.1.1, in the subsection on lethality and decreased longevity in
animals after inhalation exposure) failed to identify a NOAEL for
hepatotoxicity. Lee et al. (1977a) observed no adverse effects on
biochemical parameters of rats or mice exposed to 3250 ppm. Several
mitotic figures, indicating increased rate of cell division, were
observed in the livers of rats exposed to 50 or 1,000 ppm at 8 to
9 months, and increased rate of DNA synthesis was observed at 50 ppm.
Since the liver is a known target organ for the toxicity and
oncogenicity of vinyl chloride, these effects are judged to be
potentially adverse, and 50 ppm is considered an effect level in this
s tudy.
     Feron et al. (1979a) exposed rats to 0 or 5,000 ppm, 7 h/day,
5 days/week for 4, 13, 26, or 52 weeks and observed histopathologic
alteration of the liver after 13 weeks and ultrastructural alteration
after only 4 weeks of exposure.
     Oral, human.  Data were not located regarding hepatotoxicity in
orally exposed humans.
     Oral, animal.  A gavage study in rats  identifies 30 mg/kg as a
NOAEL and 100 mg/kg as a LOAEL  for liver effects in  an  intermediate-
length study. Feron et al.  (1975) administered vinyl chloride  in soybean
oil by gavage to groups of  15 rats per sex  at 0, 30, 100, or 300 mg/kg.
6 days/week for 13 weeks. Parameters of  liver toxicity  evaluated
included serum biochemistry, relative liver weight,  and histopathologic
and histochemical examination at all dosages and electron microscopy at
0 and 300 mg/kg. No effects were observed at 30 mg/kg,  equivalent to
26 mg/kg/day. Reduced blood sugar and slightly altered  hepatocytes were
observed at 100 and 300 mg/kg.  A dose-related increase  in relative liver
weight was observed and became  statistically significant only  at
300 mg/kg. Hypertrophic rough endoplasmic reticulum was observed at
300 mgAg.
     The key  long-term  oral study that defines thresholds  for
hepatotoxicity was reported by  Til et al.  (1983) and was described  in
Sect. 4.3.1.2,  in the subsection on  lethality and  decreased longevity  in
animals after inhalation  exposure. Diets provided  daily dosages  of  0,

-------
                                                   Toxicological Data   43

  0  014, 0.13, or  1.3 mgAg/day  to rats  for  their  lifetime. There were no
  effects  on general appearance, behavior, food consumption, body weight
  or limited hematologic and biochemical parameters. Relative organ
  weights  were not evaluated. Noncarcinogenic adverse histopathologic
  effects  were confined to the liver and consisted  of hepatocellular
  alteration and hepatic cysts in both sexes at 1.3 mg/kg/day  An
  increased incidence of basophilic foci were observed in both sexes at
  1.3 mgAg/day and only in females in the two lower dosage groups
  Lacking  a dose-related increase in the incidence of basophilic foci and
  histopathological evidence of adverse effects at 0.13 mgAg/day  such as
  were observed at the higher dosage,  basophilic foci in the liver of rats
  of one sex may be considered a nonadverse,  although compound-related
  ™Ie?C'     d°Sage of °'13 »8Ag/day, therefore,  may be considered a'
  NOAEL, and 1.3 mgAg/day may be considered a LOAEL for hepatotoxicity.
      An earlier lifetime study from this laboratory supports the NOAEL
  for hepatotoxicity of 0.13 mgAg/day. Feron et al. (1981) fed  diets
 containing polyvinyl  chloride with  high levels of vinyl chloride monomer
  to rats that provided intakes of 0,  1.7,  5.0,  or  14.1 mgAg/day  An
  increased incidence cf several  histopathologic lesions, some of which
 were probably preneoplastic,  were observed  in the livers of  rats from
 all treated groups.

      Dermal.   Data  regarding hepatotoxicity associated with  dermal
 exposure  of humans  or  animals to  vinyl  chloride were  not located.

      General  discussion.   Symptoms and  signs  of liver disease  associated
 with occupational exposure  to vinyl  chloride  include  pain or discomfort
 in  the right-hand upper quadrant  of  the abdomen,  hepatomegaly
 splenomegaly, portal hypertension, thrombocytopenia,  esophageal  varices
 and evidence  of fibrosis and  cirrhosis; however,  these  observations are'
 not pathognomonic for vinyl-chloride-induced  liver disease (Lilis  et  al
 1975,  Popper  and Thomas 1975, Lee et  al.  1977b).  Severity of the
 clinical  picture appeared to  correlate  positively with  duration  of
 exposure  (Lilis et al. 1975). Biochemical screening and liver  function
 tests  generally have not been useful  to monitor the presence or  progress
 of  the  disease (Lee et al. 1977b, Lilis et  al. 1975), although recently,
 Doss et al. (1984) noted that increased urinary porphyrin and
 coproporphyrin occurred consistently  in cases of  liver  disease induced
 by  vinyl  chloride and other industrial hepatotoxins.

     A number of investigators have noted that metabolites of vinyl
 chloride  bind covalently to hepatocellular  macromolecules  and may  be
 important in the mechanism of carcinogenesis (Bolt et al.  1976b  Bolt
 1986  Kappus et al.  1976, Watanabe et al. 1978a, Watanabe  and Gehring
 1976). A mechanism for noncarcinogenic liver effects has  not been
 postulated; however, since many of the lesions observed in the livers of
yjj^-chloride-exposed rats are considered preneoplastic  (Feron et  al.
 1981), it seems reasonable to suspect that macromolecular  binding  of
 reactive  intermediates may be involved in noncarcinogenic  toxicity
Support is derived from the data of Jaeger et al.   (1977),  who observed
that mixed-function oxidase inducers Aroclor 1254 and phenobarbital
potentiate the acute hepatotoxicity in rats exposed to vinyl chloride by
inhalation. Pretreatment with SKF 525-A. a nixed-function  oxidase
inhibitor, prevented vinyl-chloride-induced toxicity

-------
44   Section 4

     It should be noted that Che oral NOAEL for hepatotoxicIty in a
chronic study (Til et al. 1983) was far below the NOAEL in a subchronlc
study  (Feron et al. 1975). At least for oral exposure, the duration of
exposure appears to be of major Importance.
4.3.2.2  Nervous system effects
     Inhalation, human.  Vinyl chloride was once considered for use as
an inhalation anesthetic (ACGIH 1986a).  Acute exposures to 0.8 to 2.0%
vinyl chloride  (8,000  to 20,000 ppm) have been associated with
dizziness, giddiness,  euphoria, ataxia,  headache, and narcosis
(Nicholson et al. 1975, Lester et al. 1963). Recent data from the
foreign literature suggest that subtle signs of neurotoxicity may be
associated with occupational exposure. Mild distal axonal neuropathy was
reported in the legs of 45/64 exposed vinyl chloride workers, which was
suggestive to the investigators of a dying-back syndrome (Perticoni et
al. 1986). Halama et al. (1985) associated neurologic and psychiatric
disease with occupational exposure. Dinceva et al. (1985) reported
electroencephalogram (EEC) changes that they thought were indicative of
early evidence of neurotoxicity in workers exposed to vinyl chloride in
combination with other organic solvents. Exposure levels were not
reported by these authors.
     Inhalation, animal.  Oster et al. (1947) anesthetized dogs with -7
to 50% (70,000 to 500,000 ppm) vinyl chloride and concluded that its use
as an anesthetic was unsuitable because of cardiac and muscular effects.
Lester et al. (1963) exposed rats to concentrations ranging from 5 to
15% (50,000 to 150,000 ppm) for up to 2 h to evaluate CNS effects.
Moderate intoxication  was observed at 5%, loss of reflexes was observed
at 5 to 10%, and deep  surgical anesthesia was reached at 15%. Patty et
al. (1930) produced ataxia and narcosis in guinea pigs exposed to 2.5 to
5% (25,000 to 50,000 ppm) vinyl chloride for 2 to 5 min. Nervous system
effects and histopathologic lesions in the brain were not reported in
mice exposed to 50 ppm 6 h/day, 5 days/week for up to 12 months (Lee et
al. 1977a) or in rats  exposed to 5,000 ppm 7 h/day, 5 days/week for
12 months (Feron and Kroes 1979).

     Oral.  Neurological effects have not been reported in orally
exposed humans or in rats treated by gavage with vinyl chloride in soya
bean oil at 300 mg/kg, 6 days/week for 13 weeks  (Feron et al. 1975) or
at 300 mg/kg, 5 days/week for 84 weeks (Feron et al. 1981).
     Dermal.  Neurologic effects in dentally exposed humans or animals
have not been reported.

     General discussion.  CNS effects appear to be a manifestation of
acute inhalation exposure to high levels of vinyl chloride in humans and
animals (Nicholson et  al. 1975, Lester et al. 1963) that may result in
death, at least in animals (Lester et al. 1963, Mastromatteo et al.
1960). Recent human data provide some evidence that chronic exposure to
vinyl chloride may result in neurologic or psychiatric effects
(Perticoni et al. 1986, Dinceva et al. 1985, Halama et al. 1985).
Further investigation  is needed. Neurologic signs or effects on the
brain have not been reported in chronic inhalation studies in rats and
mice (Lee et al. 1977a; Feron and Kroes 1979; Feron et al. 1975, 1981).

-------
                                                  lexicological Data    45

 4.3.2.3  Other systemic effects

      Vinyl chloride disease froa inhalation exposure,  human.   Vinyl
 chloride disease is the name given to the total clinical syndrome
 associated with^occupational exposure.  It includes a syndrome  known  as
 acroosteolysis or dissolution of the  ends of the distal  phalanges  of the
 hands,  circulatory disturbance in the extremities. Raynaud syndrome,
 scleroderma,  hematologic effects,  and effects on the lungs, as well  as
 the liver effects previously discussed (Halama et al.  1985, Sakabe 1975,
 Lilis et al.  1975,  Markowitz et al. 1972,  Wilson et al.  1967,  Dinman et
 al.  1971,  Preston et al.  1976).  In addition,  Micu et al.  (1985)  reported
 obscure effects of unknown  toxicological  significance  on enzyme  levels
 of leukocytes and thrombocytes of exposed workers.  Other investigators
 have reported elevated  levels  of circulating IgG (Bogdanikowa  and
 Zawilska 1984)  or immune complexes (Ward  1976)  as part of the  syndrome,
 but the biological  significance  of these  effects is not  clear.
      Vinyl chloride disease  from inhalation exposure,  animal.   Lee et
 al.  (1977a,  1978)  exposed rats and mice to vinyl chloride at 0,  50,  250,
 or 1,000 ppm  6  h/day, 5  days/week for up  to 12  months, as described  in
 Sect. 4.3.2.1,  in the subsection on hepatotoxicity in  animals  after
 inhalation exposure.  Parameters  of toxicity evaluated  included general
 appearance,  feed  consumption,  body weight,  hematology, clinical
 chemistry,  macrophage counts of  pulmonary washings,  cytogenic
 examination of  bone marrow cultures,  senographic radiography of  the  long
 bones of the  limbs,  gross necropsy, selected organ weights, and
 histopathologic examination  of a comprehensive  set of  organs and
 tissues. Abnormalities observed  in the mice included body weight loss  at
 1,000 ppm  after 8 months  of  normal  growth  and elevated pulmonary
 macrophage  count  in mice  from  all  exposure  groups that had
 bronchoalveolar adenoma.  Because  of its association with lung  tumors,  an
 elevated pulmonary  macrophage  count in mice in  this study is not
 considered  a  noncarcinogenic toxic effect.  Rats  exposed  to 1,000 ppm had
 reduced  body  weights compared  with controls.  Other noncarcinogenic
 adverse  effects were not observed  in  rats.

     Bi  et  al.  (1985) exposed  rats to  10,  100,  or 1,000  ppm 6  h/day,
 6  days/week for 12  months to evaluate effects on the testis (see Sect.
 4.3.4.1, in the subsection on  reproductive  toxicity in animals after
 inhalation exposure). At  termination  of exposure,  a concentration-
 related  decrease  in body weights was  evident  and became  statistically
 significant at  100  ppm.  Effects  on body weight were  not  reported by
 Torkelson et  al.  (1961)   in rats  (n S  12) exposed for 7 h/day,
 5  days/week to  500  ppm for 4.5 months or  to 200  ppm for  6  months, or in
 dogs (n  - 1), guinea pigs (n - 10). or rabbits  (n - 3) exposed to
 200 ppm  by the same schedule. The value of  this  study  is  jeopardized by
 small animal  group  sizes.

     In  a series of studies on rats exposed to 0 or  5,000  ppm  7  h/day,
 5 days/week for 1 year,  adverse effects not previously discussed
 included slightly reduced growth, hematologic evidence of  anemia,
decreased blood clotting time, and minor biochemical alterations of
uncertain biological significance  (Feron et al.  1979a,b;  Feron and Kroes
 1979). Effects on the kidney were noted and included elevated  relative
kidney weights, slightly increased blood urea nitrogen (BUN),  altered

-------
46   Section 4

urinalysis parameters, and  increased intensity of progressive nephrosis,
all  compared with controls. Other noncarcinogenic lesions seen in
treated  rats included mild  alterations of the Zymbal glands and lungs,
increased splenic hematopoiesis, degeneration of the myocardium and
thickening of the walls of  the arteries, and hyperplasia of the
olfactory epithelium.

     Vinyl chloride disease from oral exposure, human.  Data regarding
effects  of vinyl chloride in orally exposed humans were not located.

     Vinyl chloride disease from oral exposure, animal.  In a 13-week
study described in Sect. 4.3.2.1, in the subsection on hepatotoxicity in
animals  after oral exposure, Feron et al. (1975) treated rats with vinyl
chloride at 0, 30, 100, or  300 mg/kg 6 days/week. Parameters of toxicity
not  previously discussed included general appearance and behavior, body
weight,  food consumption, hematology, selected blood chemistry and
urinalysis tests, gross appearance on necropsy, relative weights of
major organs, and histopathologic appearance of a wide range of organs
and  tissues. Minor hematologic and biochemical changes were observed but
were not considered to be adverse. Decreased relative adrenal weight was
observed in males at 300 mgAg but was not considered toxicologically
significant. No adverse response was reported in other organs or
tissues.

     In a lifetime study also described in Sect. 4.3.2.1, in the
subsection on hepatoxicity  in animals after oral exposure, Feron et al.
(1981) fed rats diets that provided 0, 1.7, 5.0, or 14.1 mg/kg/day vinyl
chloride. An additional group was treated by gavage with 300 mg/kg
5 days/week. Parameters of  toxicity evaluated included general
appearance and behavior, body weight, food consumption, hematology,
blood chemistry, urinalysis, gross appearance at necropsy, and
histopathologic examination of a wide range of tissues from controls and
the  two higher-dose groups, with a more limited histopathologic
examination of low-dose rats. Lethargy and poor condition were reported
at 25.0 mg/kg/day, apparently in rats that developed tumors.
Noncarcinogenic effects included reduced blood clotting time and
increased splenic hematopoiesis at 214.1 but not at 5.0 mg/kg/day.

     Vinyl chloride disease from dermal exposure.  Data regarding toxic
effects of vinyl chloride in dermally exposed humans or animals were not
located.

     Vinyl chloride disease, general discussion.  Vinyl chloride disease
in humans appears to involve a large number of organ systems and
tissues, including the liver, as discussed in Sect. 4.3.2.3, in the
subsection on vinyl chloride disease in humans after inhalation exposure
(Halama et al. 1985, Sekabe 1975, Lilis et al. 1975, Harkowitz et al.
1972, Wilson et al. 1967, Dinman et al. 1971, Preston et al. 1976). It
is not possible to determine the critical effect in humans (the effect
that occurs at the lowest exposure) because quantitative human exposure
data were not provided. Animals exposed orally or by inhalation manifest
cancerous and noncancerous  liver effects similar to those seen in
humans, but other effects seen in humans, such as acroosteolysis,
Raynaud syndrome, and scleroderma, have not been reproduced in animals,
even at very high exposures. Liver effects appear to be the critical end

-------
                                                 Toxicologies! Data   47

 point  In  animals;  therefore, animals are probably a satisfactory model
 for  noncancerous end points of  toxicity in humans.

 4.3.3  Developmental Toxicity
                  •   -
 4.3.3.1   Inhalation

     Human.  Epidemiological data associate increased fetal loss with
 occupational exposure to vinyl  chloride, although exposure data were not
 quantified. Using a questionnaire, Infante et al. (1976) and Waxweiler
 et al. (1977) studied the outcome of pregnancies of wives of 95 vinyl
 chloride  workers and a control  group of 158 unexposed rubber workers and
 polyvinyl chloride fabricators  exposed to "very low" levels of vinyl
 chloride  monomer. Data were obtained for the exposed cohort regarding
 pregnancies that occurred before and during employment in a vinyl-
 chloride-contaminated atmosphere. The most significant observation was
 that "age adjusted" fetal loss  occurred in 8.8% of the pregnancies of
 wives of  controls and in 15.8%  of the pregnancies of wives of exposed
 workers.  The most significant difference occurred in wives of men under
 age  30, where fetal 1>ss was 5.3% for controls and 20.0% for exposed
 workers.  Published (Hatch et al. 1981, Stallones et al. 1987) and
 unpublished (The Vinyl Institute 1987, Downs et al. 1977) evaluations
 severely criticize the conduct  and statistical analysis of the Infante
 et al. (1976) study.  These evaluations concluded that the study in fact
 showed no association of paternal occupational exposure to vinyl
 chloride with increased fetal loss and that the study actually lacked
 the statistical power to do so.

     In a preliminary investigation of the potential for vinyl chloride
 exposure  to increase the occurrence of congenital malformations, Infante
 (1976) compared the number of malformations per 1,000 live births in
 three Ohio cities where polyvinyl chloride production plants were
 located (index cities)  with the incidence in the state as a whole and
with the  incidence in other parts of the counties in which the index
cities were located.  The incidence of malformations was greater in the
 three index cities by either comparison, and the difference was
statistically significant.  Greatest increases were noted in
malformations of the CNS, upper alimentary tract, and genital organs,
and in the incidence of clubfoot. Published (Hatch et al. 1981,
Stallones et al. 1987)  and unpublished (The Vinyl Institute 1987, Downs
et al. 1977) evaluations severely criticize the conduct and statistical
analysis of the Infante et al.   (1976) study. These evaluations concluded
that the study in fact showed no association between living in a region
with a vinyl chloride factory and an increased incidence of birth
defects.

     An additional study of one of the Ohio cities revealed no
association with parental occupation and no evidence that parents of
malformed infants lived closer to the local polyvinyl chloride plant
than did a randomly selected group of parents who delivered normal
infants (Edmonds et al.  1975).  Edmonds et al.  (1975) concluded that
there was no association of birth defects with exposure to vinyl
chloride.

-------
48   Section 4

     Theriault et al. (1983) investigated the incidence of birth defects
in residents of a Canadian town where there is a vinyl chloride
polymerization plant. The incidence of birth defects was significantly
greater  in the index town than in any or all of three matched towns with
no potential exposure to vinyl chloride. The most commonly reported
defects  involved the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, central nervous,
and urogenital systems. The incidence rate peaked in March and was
lowest in September for the index town, but no seasonal effect was
observed in the comparison communities. The lowest incidence rate
followed the time of lowest estimated ambient atmospheric levels of
vinyl chloride by 8 months. In comparisons between parents of deformed
infants and control parents in the index town, no correlations were
noted with proximity of residence to the vinyl chloride plant or with
parental occupation. Furthermore, there were several industries in the
index town that emitted pollutants into the atmosphere. The
investigators concluded that the available data did not substantiate an
association between atmospheric vinyl chloride and an increased
incidence of birth defects.

     Edmonds et al. (1978) compared the incidence rates of CNS defects
in a West Virginia county in which a polyvinyl chloride polymerization
plant was located with those for other regions in the United States with
no exposure to vinyl chloride. The incidence rates of the index county
exceeded those of control areas by a factor of 1.5 to 2. By comparing
data from parents of deformed infants with randomly chosen matched
controls living in the index county, no correlation was noted for
parental occupation, for proximity to the polyvinyl chloride plant, or
for patterns of wind direction and air pollution. Furthermore, one major
and several smaller chemical plants were located in the area.
     Animal.  Inhalation experiments in animals have not associated
vinyl chloride with developmental toxicity at concentrations below those
associated with maternal toxicity. John et al. (1977) exposed groups of
30 to 40 pregnant CF1 mice, 20 to 35 Sprague-Dawley rats, and 15 to 20
New Zealand white rabbits to vinyl chloride at 0 or 500 ppm 7 h/day on
gestation days 6 to 15 for rats and mice and 6 to 18 for rabbits.
Additional groups of mice were similarly exposed to 50 ppm, and
additional groups of rats and rabbits were similarly exposed to
2,500 ppm. Parameters of maternal and developmental toxicity.were
evaluated; both the fetus and litter were evaluated. In mice, maternal
effects were restricted to 500 ppm and included increased mortality,
reduced body weight, and reduced absolute, but not relative, liver
weight. Fetotoxicity, manifested as Increased fetal resorption,
decreased fetal body weight, reduced litter size, and retarded cranial
and stemebral ossification, was observed only at 500 ppm. There was no
evidence of a teratogenic effect in mice at either concentration.
Maternal effects in rats at 500 ppm, but not at 2,500 ppm, were
restricted to reduced body weight gain. Maternal effects in rats at
2,500 ppm were death of one rat, elevated absolute and relative liver
weights, and reduced food consumption. Reduced fetal body weight and an
increase in the incidence of lumbar spurs were observed at 500 but not
2,500 ppm and are not considered signs of chemical*related fetotoxicity.
The incidence of dilated ureters, however, was increased at 2,500 ppm

-------
                                                 lexicological Data   49

and may represent a chemical-Induced effect. Signs of maternal or
developmental toxicity were not observed in rabbits at either 500 or
2,500 ppm.
     Ungvary et al. (1978) exposed groups of pregnant CFY rats
continuously to -1,500 ppm on gestation days 8 to 14 or 14 to 21 in a
study that identified a NOAEL for developmental toxicity in rats.
Controls consisted of groups of rats that were chamber exposed to air
only on gestation days 8 to 14 or 14 to 21. An additional control group
consisted of unexposed rats that were not subjected to the chamber.
Groups contained 14 to 28 litters, and the litter was a unit of
comparison for fetal effects.  Maternal toxicity was manifested by
increased relative liver weight in dams exposed on gestation days 8 to
14 and slightly reduced body weight gain in dans exposed on days 14 to
21. There was no evidence of fetal toxicity or teratogenicity. In
another part of this study, rats were exposed as described above on
gestation days 1 to 9 and simultaneously injected subcutaneously with
physiologic saline. Compared with air-exposed controls treated with
physiologic saline, these rats had significantly increased relative
liver weights and  fetal wastage, and a slight but not statistically
significant increase in the percentage of  fetuses with body weights
<3.3 g. The investigators also observed one fetus with anophthalmia and
one with microphthalmia in rats exposed during days 1 to 9, as well as a
tendency  for increased fetal wastage in rats exposed on days  8 to  14.
They suggested that the developmental toxicity of vinyl chloride should
be tested by continuous exposure  throughout the period of organogenesis.
     In a Bulgarian study, Mirkova et al.  (1978) exposed pregnant  rats
to 0 or 6.15 mg/m3 (2.4 ppm) continuously  throughout gestation.
Fetotoxic effects  included early  postimplantation  fetal loss,  reduced
fetal body weights, retarded ossification,  and fetal hematomas.
Teratogenic effects included anomalies of  the brain. In offspring  from
rats allowed to deliver,  liver  function at 1 month of age was
compromised, as  indicated by  increased hexobarbital sleeping  time.
     In a Russian  study,  Sal'nikova  and Kotsovskaya (1980)  exposed
pregnant  rats  to 0, 4.8,  or 35.5  mg/m3  (0, 1.9,  or 13.9 ppm)  4 h/day
throughout gestation. Maternal  effects  included  decreased RBC count and
decreased urinary  excretion of  hippuric  acid  at  13.9 ppm. Fetal
hemorrhages were reported at both exposure levels,  and fetal  edema was
reported  at  35.5 mg/m3.  In offspring of  rats  allowed to  deliver,
behavioral changes were  reported at  35.5  mg/m3,  and liver effects,
hematologic  and  biochemical effects,  and altered relative organ weights
were reported  in both groups.

4.3.3.2   Oral
     Data regarding  developmental toxicity in orally exposed humans or
animals were not located.
 4.3.3.3  Dei
      Data regarding developmental toxicity in dentally exposed humans or
 animals were not located.

-------
SO   Section 4

4.3.3.4  General discussion

     Early epidemiologic data suggested an association between paternal
occupational exposure to yiny.1 chloride and fetal loss (Infante et al.
1976, Uaxveiler et al. 1977) and between parental residence in a region
with a vinyl chloride plant and an increased incidence of birth defects
(Infante et al. 1976). Subsequent evaluations of this study (Hatch et
al. 1981, Stallones et al. 1987, Downs et al. 1977,  The Vinyl Institute
1987) severely criticize its conduct and statistical analysis and
seriously question its ability to detect the end points reported. Other
studies (Edmonds et al. 1975, 1978;  Theriault et al. 1983) found no
association between parental residence in a region with a vinyl chloride
plant and the incidence of birth defects. Developmental toxicity was not
observed in animals exposed for 7- to 12-day periods during
organogenesis at levels below those  also associated with severe maternal
toxicity (John et al. 1977, Ungvary  et al.  1978). Ungvary et al. (1978),
however, noted evidence of developmental toxicity in rats exposed in the
first trimester compared with rats exposed later in gestation and
suggested that valid testing should  involve exposure during the entire
gestation period. A Bulgarian study  reported both fetotoxicity and
teratogenicity in rats exposed continuously to a low concentration
throughout gestation (Mirkova et al. 1978). The protocol and results
were incompletely reported; hence, the study cannot be properly
evaluated.  Reporting problems also preclude proper evaluation of a
Russian study (Sal'nikova and Kotsovskaya 1980) that reported
developmental toxicity in rats intermittently exposed to low levels
throughout gestation. These studies, however, underscore the need for
further testing, using continuous exposure at low levels throughout
gestation.

4.3.4  Reproductive Toxicity

4.3.4.1  Inhalation

     Human.  Russian studies examined sexual function and hormone levels
in men (Makarov 1984) and sexual function and gynecological health in
women (Makarov et al. 1984) occupationally exposed to vinyl chloride and
in unexposed control groups. Sexual  function was evaluated by
questionnaire, hormone levels were measured, and women were given
gynecological examinations. Exposures were reported as low. not
exceeding 1 maximum allowable concentration (MAC) (30 mg/m3 or -12 ppm);
average, in the range of 1 to 5 MAC  (12 to 60 ppm); or significant,
exceeding 5 MAC (60 ppm). An exposure- and duration-related decline in
sexual function was reported in exposed men and women. Ovarian
dysfunction, benign uterine growths, and prolapsed genital organs were
reported in 77% of exposed women.

     Animal.  Bi et al. (1985) exposed groups of 75 adult male Vistar
rats to 0,  10, 100, or 3,000 ppm, 6  h/day,  6 days/week for up to 12
months to evaluate effects on the testes. Relative testicular weight,
evaluated only after 6 months of exposure,  was significantly reduced at
100 and 3,000 ppm. Histopathological examination revealed a
concentration-related increase in the incidence of testicular
degeneration significant at 100 ppm. In an earlier study, Torkelson et
al. (1961)  observed no effects on relative testicular weight in  rats

-------
                                                 Toxicological Data   51

exposed to 500 ppm 7 h/day,  5 days/week for 4.5 months,  or in dogs,
rabbits, or guinea pigs exposed to 200 ppm 7 h/day,  5 days/week for
6 months. The quality of this study was limited,  however,  because of the
small numbers of animals tested.  Exposures involved up to  12 rats/sex
and 12 guinea pigs/sex, 3 rabbits/sex, and 1 dog/sex.

4.3.A.2  Oral
     Data regarding the reproductive effects of vinyl chloride in orally
exposed humans or animals were not found in the literature.

4.3.4.3  Dermal
     Data regarding the reproductive effects of vinyl chloride in
dermally exposed humans or animals were not found.

4.3.4.4  General discussion
     Data regarding the reproductive effects of exposure to vinyl
chloride are limited. Human data associating occupational  exposure with
reduced sexual function in both sexes and impaired gynecological health
in women (Makarov 1984, Makarov et al. 1984) are not adequately reported
for proper evaluation; therefore, such data cannot be used to identify
thresholds. Whereas animal data do associate exposure to vinyl chloride
with testicular effects, sexual performance and fertility were not
tested.

4.3.5  Genotoxic ity

4.3.5.1  Human
     Genotoxicity studies of vinyl chloride in humans include a  large
number of chromosomal aberration tests in the peripheral lymphocytes of
occupationally exposed workers (Table 4.4). These tests (Ducatman  et al
1975, Funes-Cravioto et al. 1975, Purchase et al. 1978, Hansteen et al
1978, Kucerova et al. 1979, Katsova and Pavlenko 1985), with  the
exception of a less rigorously performed and reported Dow Chemical
Company study (Kilian et al. 1975), generally suggest a mutagenic  role
for vinyl chloride. The key study in  this group  is Hansteen et al.
(1978), in which blood from 37 exposed workers and from 16  to  32
unexposed controls was examined  twice at  intervals of'2 to  2.5 years.
Exposure levels during the  time  of  first  sampling were measured  at
25 ppm, and there was a statistically significant  increase  in the
percent of peripheral lymphocytes with chromosomal aberrations.  When
these workers were subsequently  reexamined, exposure levels had  dropped
to  1 ppm. and there were no statistical differences  between exposed and
controls in the percentage  of chromosomal aberrations.

     Anderson et al.  (1980) observed  an increase  in  lymphocytes  with
chromosomal aberrations  in  another  cohort at exposure  levels  estimated
at  50 ppm. The incidence of aberrations was returning to  normal,
however, when the cohort was  resampled after exposure  levels  had been
reduced  to <5 ppm. In  a Russian  paper (Katsova and Pavlenko 1985),
0.1 mg/m^  (-0.04 ppm) was suggested as a  no-effect level  for  chromosomal

-------
52    Section 4
                        Table 4.4. Genotoxicity of vinyl chloride in vivo
         End point
   Species/test system
Result
References
 Recessive lethal
 Dominant lethal
 Sex chromosome loss
 Chromosomal translocation
 Chromosomal aberration
 Sister chromatid exchange
 Chromosomal aberration
 Chromosomal aberration
 Micronucleus test
 RNA alkylation"
 DNA alkylation
 DNA alkylation
Drosophila melanogaster
D. melanogaster
Mouse

D. melanogaster
D. melanogaster
Rat
Mouse
Human lymphocyte
Human lymphocyte
Human lymphocyte
Human lymphocyte
Human lymphocyte
Human lymphocyte
Human lymphocyte
Human lymphocyte
Human lymphocyte
Mouse
Rat
Rat
Mouse
Rat
         Verburgt and Vogel 1977
         Verburgt and Vogel 1977
         Purchase et al.  197S.
         Anderson et al. 1976
         Verburgt and Vogel 1977
         Verburgt and Vogel 1977
         Anderson and Richardson 1981
         Walles and Holmberg 1984
         Hansteen et al. 1978
         Hansteen et al.  1978
         Kucerova et al. 1979
         Kucerova et al. 1979
         Purchase et al.  197S, 1978
         Ducatman et al. 1975
         Funes-Cravioto et al. 197S
         Katsova and Pavlenko 198S
         Kilian et al. 197S
         Jenssen and Ramel 1980
         Laib and Bolt 1977
         Laib et al. 198S
         Osterman-Golkar et al. 1977
         Green and Hathway 1978
    "Although RNA alkylation is not a genotoxic effect, the results of this test are supportive evi-
 dence that vinyl chloride metabolites interact with nucleic acids.

-------
                                                  Toxicological Dae a.   53

 aberrations. The study was insufficiently reported to allow critical
 evaluation, however, and the NOAEL from the Hansteen et al. (1978) study
 is accepted.

 4.3.5.2  Nonhuman

      It is beyond the scope of this document to evaluate all data
 regarding the mutagenicity of vinyl chloride in nonhuman systems.
 Representative data, largely taken from a recent EPA (1985b) review,  are
 presented in Tables 4.4 and 4.5.

      Vinyl chloride is mutagenic  in Salmonella typhimurium (Rannug et
 al.  1974;  Bartsch et al.  1975,  1976;  Andrews et al.  1976;  Simmon et al.
 1977;  Elmore et al.  1976;  Poncelet et al.  1980;  de  Meester et  al.  1980).
 but  only in strains reverted by base-pair substitution by  alkylating
 agents rather than by frameshift  mutations (Bartsch et al.  1976).
 Metabolic  activation may  be necessary for any mutagenic activity in this
 system (Rannug et al.  1974) or  for a maximal response (Simmon  et al.
 1977).  Results in other microbial systems were mixed.  Vinyl chloride  was
 positive for recessive lethal effects but negative  for dominant  lethal
 effects, chromosomal translocation,  and sex chromosome loss in
 Drosophila melanogaster (Verburgt and Vogel 1977).  The investigators
 suggested  that the  negative results  in the dominant lethal  test  may
 indicate that metabolites  capable of causing chromosomal damage  did not
 reach  the  germ cells.  Negative  results were obtained for the dominant
 lethal  test in mice  (Purchase et  al.  1975,  Anderson et al.  1976).

     Positive results  were  obtained  in mutation and cell transformation
 tests  and  in chromosomal aberration  tests  in in vivo and in vitro
 mammalian  systems  (Styles  1977, Drevon and Kuroki 1979.  Jenssen  and
 Ramel  1980,  Walles  and Holmberg 1984,  Laib and Bolt  1977,  Laib et  al.
 1985, Anderson and  Richardson 1981).  Positive  results  were  also  reported
 for DNA  alkylation  tests in rats  (Green and Hathway  1978)  and  mice
 (Osterman-Golkar et  al. 1977) and for RNA  alkylation in rat liver
 microsomes  (Laib and Bolt  1977).

 4.3.5.3  General discussion

     Evidence  strongly  implicates  the  oxidation  of vinyl chloride  to  the
 reactive intermediates  2-chloroethylene  oxide  and 2-chloroacetaldehyde
 as being responsible for mutagenicity in the systems  discussed above.
 Reports  indicate that  2-chloroethylene  oxide and 2-chloroacetaldehyde
 are manyfold more active in S. typhLmuriun than  the  parent  compound or
 other oxidation products of vinyl  chloride  such  as 2-chloroethanol or
 chloroacetic acid (Rannug et  al.  1976,  Bartsch 1976, McCann et al.
 1975). 2-Chloroethylene oxide has  also been  shown to be  responsible for
 base-pair substitutions in EscherichLa coii  (Barbin  et  al.  1985a),  to be
 highly mutagenic in gene mutation  and gene conversion  tests  in yeasts
 (Loprieno et al. 1977), and to induce mutations  in Chinese  hamster V79
 cells (Huberman et al. 1975). In vitro  testing has shown that
 2-chloroethylene oxide is capable of alkylating  DNA  to  form
 7-(2-oxoethyl)guanine as the principal adduct  (Barbin  et al. 1985b).
This  adduct has not been shown to cause  errors in DNA  replication  in  an
 in vitro test with E. colL DNA polymerase  I, and the role of DNA
alkylation in mutagenesis is unclear.

-------
54    Section  4
                                 TtNe4J. GcMtoxkhy of Tiayl chloridt hi rhro
            End point
                                                               Result
     Species/test system
 Without
activation
  With
activation
References
        Reverse mutation
Salmonella typhimurium
S  typhimunum
S.  typhimunum
S.  typhimunum
S.  typhimurium
S.  typhimurium
                                                                      NT"
                       Rannug et aL 1974
                       Bansch et al. 197S. 1976
                       Andrews et aL 1976
                       Simmon et al.  1977
                       Elmore et aL 1976
                       Poncelet et aL  1980.
                       de Meester et aL 1980
Forward or reverse
mutation
Reverse mutation
Forward mutation
Rec-repair
Forward mutation
Cell transformation
RNA alkylationc
Eichenchia coli —

Saccharomycts ctrevisiae —
Schizosaccharomyces pombt —
Bacillus subtills -
Chinese hamster cell V79 +
Neonatal hamster kidney cells +
Rat liver microtomes +
+

NT
•f-
NT
NA»
NA
NA
Gram et aL 197S

Shahin 1976
Lopneno et aL 1977
Elmore et aL 1976
Drevon and Kuroki 1979
Styles 1977
Laib and Bolt 1977
           "Not tested.
           "Not applicable.
           "Although RNA alkylation is not a genotoxic effect, the results of this test are supportive evidence that
        vmyl chloride metabolites interact with nucleic acids.

-------
                                                 Toxicological Data    55

4.3.6  Carcinogenicity

4.3.6.1  Inhalation
     Human.  Several reports (Tabershav and Gaffey 1974,  Monson et al.
1975. Waxweiler et al. 1976, Nicholson et al.  1975,  Heath et al.  1975,
Lills et al. 1975, Popper and Thomas 1975,  Bryen et al.  1976,  Fox and
Collier 1977, Heldaas et al. 1984,  Geryk and Zudova 1986) associate
human cancer with occupational exposure to vinyl chloride.  The most
recent review of the human data is  that of EPA (1985b).  Since  none of
the human studies quantify exposures sufficiently for quantitative risk
assessment, no single report is chosen as a key study.  In a review of
these data, IARC (1979) concluded that the human data constitute
"sufficient" evidence for the carcinogenicity of the compound  EPA
(1985b) classified vinyl chloride in I ARC Group 1; subsequently,  EPA
(1987b) placed this compound in Carcinogen Assessment Group A. Both
classifications reflect the designation of vinyl chloride as a known
human carcinogen.
     The incidence of liver cancer, in particular angiosarcoma, provides
the most convincing e/idence for the carcinogenicity of vinyl chloride
because the expected background level (25 to 30 cases per year in the
United States) is extremely low (Heath et al.  1975). Most of the
epidemiologic studies cited above reported a higher observed/expected
ratio for liver cancer than for cancers of any other site.  Other  cancers
associated with vinyl chloride exposure include tumors of the brain
and CNS, the lung and respiratory tract, the digestive tract,  and the
lymphocytic/hematopoietic system, although statistical significance  was
not necessarily reached (Monson et  al. 1975, Waxweiler et al.  1976,
Bryen et al. 1976). Fox and Collier (1977), however, concluded that
there is no evidence that cancers other than those of the liver are
associated with exposure to vinyl chloride. More recent and larger
unpublished epidemiology studies (Wong et al.  1986, Doll 1987), however.
while supporting the association of exposure with liver and brain
cancer, report no association between exposure and increased risk from
lung and respiratory cancer, lymphocytic/hematopoietic cancer, or
melanoma. Heldaas et al. (1984) also reported an unusual number of cases
of malignant melanoma of the skin in exposed workers.

     Generally, prolonged exposure (employment) increased the risk of
cancer, particularly if intermittent high exposures have occurred (Bryen
et al. 1976, Heath et al. 1975). Tabershaw and Gaffey (1974) noted that
an increased risk of malignancy correlated with an increased  "exposure
index," an interplay of level and duration of exposure. Fox and Collier
(1977), however, reported little correlation with duration of exposure

     Animal.  The key animal inhalation studies of carcinogenicity are
the series of experiments by Maltoni et al. (1980, 1981) in Sprague-
Dawley rats, Swiss mice, and golden hamsters. A report of interim
results was published earlier (Maltoni and Lefemine 1975). All animals
were chamber exposed; controls were chamber exposed to air only.  The
test material was >99.9% pure. A complete gross and histopathological
examination of every animal was performed. Mice and hamsters were
exposed to vinyl chloride concentrations of 50 to 10,000 ppm  for
30 weeks, followed by an observation period of 51 weeks  (mice) or

-------
56   Section 4

79 weeks (hamsters). Exposure levels and results from the most
comprehensive and longest term experiments in rats are presented in
Table 4.6. The investigators noted that increased incidence of tumors
occurred at 250 ppm in all species tested. All species shoved an
increase in the incidence of liver angiosarcoma. In addition to the
tumor types presented in Table 4.6, the authors associated extra hepatic
angiosarcomas, hepatomas, Zymbal gland carcinomas, and neuroblastomas in
rats with exposure to vinyl chloride.

     Other inhalation experiments support the carcinogenicity of vinyl
chloride. Rats, mice, and hamsters vere exposed to 50 to 2,500 ppm vinyl
chloride for 9 or 12 months (Keplinger et al. 1975, MCA 1980). All
species developed liver angiosarcomas in a concentration-related manner
at >50 ppm, the lowest level tested. Metastases to lymph nodes or lung
vere common. Rats also developed Zymbal gland tumors at >50 ppm and
brain tumors at 2200 ppm, and mice developed lung tumors at 250 ppm.
Viola et al. (1971) exposed rats to 3% vinyl chloride (30.000 ppm) for
12 months and observed primary tumors of the skin, lungs, and bones.
Feron and Kroes (1979) exposed rats to 0 or 5,000 ppm for 52 veeks and
observed primary tumors in treated rats in the brain, lung, Zymbal
gland, and nasal cavity. Lee et al. (1977a, 1978) exposed rats and mice
to 0, 50, 250, or 1,000 ppm, 6 h/day, 5 days/veek for up to 12 months;
subsequently, they observed an increased incidence of hemangiosarcoma of
the liver in rats at >250 ppm, as veil as bronchoalveolar adenoma of the
lung, mammary tumors, and hemangiosarcoma of the liver and other organs
in mice at 250 ppm. In a later study from the same laboratory, Hong et
al. (1981) exposed rats and mice to 0, 50, 250, or 1,000 ppm, 6 h/day,
5 days/veek for up to 6 months, folloved by a 12-month observation
period. Tumor types attributed to vinyl chloride exposure in rats vere
those observed by Lee et al. (1977a, 1978), in addition to
bronchoalveolar lung tumors at 2250 ppm and mammary tumors at all
exposure concentrations.

     Suzuki (1978, 1981, 1983) also observed lung tumors as a primary
carcinogenic response of mice to vinyl chloride. Lung tumors developed
in 26 of 27 mice exposed to 2,500 or 6,000 ppm for 5 to 6 months (Suzuki
1978). Concentration-related increased incidences of lung tumors vere
observed in studies in which mice vere exposed to 0 to 100 or 0 to
600 ppm for 4 weeks and then observed for up to 41 weeks postexposure
(Suzuki 1981, 1983). It appeared that 10 ppm was a level associated with
an increased incidence of lung tumors in mice in these studies. Hehir et
al. (1981) reported an  increased incidence of lung tumors in mice given
single 1-h exposures to 5,000 or 50,000 ppm.

     Inhalation data in three species suggest that age at exposure has
an effect on carcinogenic response. Drew et al.  (1983) exposed rats,
mice, and hamsters to concentrations of 50 to 200 ppm for periods of
6 to 24 months. Exposures vere started at 0, 6,  12, or 18 months after
weaning. All three species had a maximal ohcogenic response when exposed
during the first 12 months of life. Exposures begun after a 12-month
holding period did not produce a carcinogenic response. Maltoni et al.
(1983) and Cotti et al.  (1983) exposed rats  in utero from gestation day
12 and after birth to 1 year of age to 2,500 ppm and observed very high
incidences of liver and brain tumors. Liver  angiosarcoma, with an
average latency period  of 50 weeks, developed in 32 of 56 males and  in

-------
                                               Toxlcological Data    57
  Table 4.6.  Tumor incidence in male and female Sprague-Dawley
           rats exposed by inhalation to vinyl chloride
              4 h/day, 5 days/week for 52 weeks
Exposure level
(ppm)
0
1
5
10
25
SO
100
ISO
200
250
500
2,500
6,000
10,000
30,000
Duration of
study
(weeks)
135-147
147
147
147
147
135
143
143
143
135
135
135
135
135
68
Incidence of liver
angiosarcoma
0/363
0/118
0/119
1/119
5/120
1/60
1/120
6/119
12/120
3/59
6/60
13/60
13/59
7/60
18/60
Incidence of kidney
nephroblastoma
0/363
0/118
0/119
0/119
1/120
1/60
10/120
11/119
7/120
5/59
6/60
6/60
5/59
5/60
NR«
"Not reported.
Source:  Maltoni et al. 1980, 1981.

-------
58   Section 4

38 of 55 females. Brain tumors,  with an average latency of 48 weeks,
developed in 27 of 57 males and in 28 of 57 females.  Lower incidences  of
tumors developed in rats exposed for only 7 days in utero.  Maltoni et
al. (1980, 1981) exposed rats to 6,000 or 10,000 ppm in utero on days
12 to 18 of gestation a'nd continued to observe them for 115 weeks. In  54
high-dose progeny, there were 3 with Zymbal gland carcinoma, 2 with
angiosarcoma, and 1 with nephroblastoma of the brain.  In 32 low-dose
progeny, 1 developed Zymbal gland carcinoma and 2 had angiosarcoma.
Radike et al. (1988) exposed pregnant Sprague-Dawley rats to vinyl
chloride at 600 ppm 5 h/day on gestation days 9-21. An additional group
was also exposed through the lactation period. The occurrence of
angiosarcoma in offspring of dams exposed during gestation confirms the
transplacental carcinogenicity of vinyl chloride. Additional exposure
during lactation greatly increased the incidence of liver tumors.

4.3.6.2  Oral
     Human.  Data regarding the carcinogenicity of vinyl chloride in
orally exposed humans were not found.
     Animal.  Cancer types observed in orally treated rats resemble
those observed from inhalation exposure. In the key oral study, Feron et
al. (1981) exposed groups of Uistar rats to vinyl chloride in the diet
by incorporating polyvinyl chloride (FVC) powder containing a high level
of the monomer. Diets were fed 4 h/day, and food consumption and body
weights were monitored. Volatilization of vinyl chloride from the diet
was estimated, and dosages of vinyl chloride available to the rats were
also estimated. In addition, one group received vinyl chloride by gavage
5 days/week. Pertinent data are summarized in Table 4.7. Exposure was
for the lifetime of the rats. Treatment of the 300-mg/kg gavage group
was terminated at 84 weeks because of high mortality. The liver tumor
incidence data presented in Table 4.7 suggest that angiosarcomas
predominated at high dosages but chat hepatocellular carcinomas
predominated at low dosages. In addition to tumors of the liver and
lung, the investigators attributed exposure to the development of extra
hepatic abdominal angiosarcomas and Zymbal gland tumors. They also noted
some evidence that exposure enhanced the development of abdominal
mesotheliomas and adenocarcinomas of the mammary gland.

     Other oral studies indicate that the type of  tumor observed  may
depend on the dosage given. Maltoni  (1977) treated rats by  gavage at
16.7 or 50 mg/kg/day for 52 weeks followed by an 84-week observation
period. An Increased incidence of liver angiosarcomas and kidney
nephroblastomas was attributed to vinyl chloride.  Zymbal gland
carcinomas may also have been the result of exposure to vinyl chloride.
Til et al. (1983),  in  a lifetime study, administered vinyl  chloride in
the diet  (from PVC containing a high level of of the monomer)  to  rats  at
dosages of 0.014  to 1.3 mg/kg/day. Males at 1.3 mg/kg/day had a  small
but significantly increased  incidence of hepatocellular  carcinoma.
Females at 1.3 mg/kg/day had a significantly  increased  incidence of
hepatic neoplastic nodules, along with  a suggestive but  not significant
increase  in hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumorigenic  effects were not seen
at lower  doses.

-------
                                                                Toxlcological Data     59
                    Table 4.7.  Tumor Incidence io Wlsur rats orally exposed to
                                       rtnyl chloride"
Dose*
Sex (mg/kg/day)
F 300



F 170



F 56



F 18



F 00



M 300



M 170



M 5.6



M 18



M 0.0



Duration of
treatment
(weeks) Vehicle/ method
84 Soybean oil/
gavage


143 PVC/diet



143 PVC/diet



143 PVC/diet



NA' Untreated diet
only


84 Soybean oil/
gavage


143 PVC/diet



143 PVC/diet



143 PVC/diet



NA Untreated diet
only


Target
organ
Liver


Lung
Liver


Lung
Liver


Lung
Liver


Lung
Liver


Lung
Liver


Lung
Liver


Lung
Liver


Lung
Liver


Lung
Liver


Lung
Tumor type
Neoplastic nodule
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Angtosarcoma
Angiosarcoma
Neoplastic nodule
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Angiosarcoma
Angiosarcoma
Neoplastic nodule
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Angiosarcoma
Angiosarcoma
Neoplastic nodule
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Angiosarcoma
Angiosarcoma
Neoplastic nodule
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Angiosarcoma
Angiosarcoma
Neoplastic nodule
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Angiosarcoma
Angiosarcoma
Neoplastic nodule
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Angiosarcoma
Angiosarcoma
Neoplastic nodule
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Angiosarcoma
Angiosarcoma
Neoplastic nodule
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Angiosarcoma
Angiosarcoma
Neoplastic nodule
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Angiosarcoma
Angiosarcoma
Tumor incidence
(f> value)
2/54
0/54
29/54
23/54
44/57 (/><0 001 f
29/57 (/><0 001 )c
9/57 (/><0 001 f
5/57(/»<005)<0 001 )f
8/59 (/><0 001 )c
27/59 (P<0 001 )c
19/59 (/»<0 01 )c
7/56(/»
-------
  60    Section  4

  4.3.6.3   Dermal

       Data regarding  the  carclnogenlclty of vinyl chloride In dermally
  exposed humans or animals were not found.

  4.3.6.4   General discussion

       The  data reviewed Indicate that there is some similarity in cancer
  types In  experimentally  exposed animals and occupationally exposed
  humans. The human data present the strongest statistical case for
  associating occupational exposure with liver angiosarcoma (Monson et al
  1975, Waxweiler et al. 1976, Bryen et al. 1976,  Fox and Collier 1977)  '
  The incidence of cancer of the brain, lung,  and digestive tract
  although  not  always statistically significant,  is suggestive of'a vinyl
  foi!r ?,?C,2«P' M°re reCent lar*er ""P^l^hed studies (Wong et al.
  1986, Doll 1987) associate vinyl chloride exposure with liver
  angiosarcoma and possibly with tumors of the brain, but not with tumors
  of the lung or digestive tract.  The substantial  amount of animal data
 also presents the strongest association for  liver angiosarcoma (Maltoni
 et al. 1980, 1981; MCA 1980; Feron and Kroes 1979). Statistically
 significant increases have also  been observed for lung cancer In mice
  (Lee et al. 1978; Hong et al.  1981;  Suzuki 1978,  1981, 1983)   and
 biologically significant increases have been reported for brain cancer
 in rats (Feron and Kroes 1979; MCA 1980;  Maltoni  et al.  1980,  1981)
 Animal data suggest that both the  young and  the prenatal organism are
 ™eptlble C° ^"y1'chloride-induced cancer (Maltoni et al.  1980,  1981
 1983;  Drew et al. 1983;  Radike et  al.  1988).

 v, ,_,It ls «enerally «8«ed that oxidation to 2-chloroethylene  oxide, a
 highly electrophlllc Intermediate,  is responsible for the mutagenlcity
 of vinyl  chloride (Gwinner et al.  1983. Valno 1978).  In vitro  testing
 has  shown 2-chloroethylene oxide capable  of  alkylating DNA to  form
 7-(2-oxoethyl)guanlne as  the principal  adduce (Barbln et al.  1985b)
 This  adduct has not  been  shown to  be  Involved In  genetic miscoding  and
 the  role  of DNA alkylation in carcinogenesis  Is unclear.

 4.4   INTERACTIONS WITH OTHER CHEMICALS

     A series  of  investigations describes  the interactions of vinyl
 chloride with  various other  compounds, which  clarifies the role of
 metabolism In  the toxlelty of this compound.   In all studies, the acute
 toxiclty to the liver of  rats exposed by  inhalation to high
 concentrations, as manifested by serua levels of  enzymes  indicative  of
 liver  damage and  the hlstopathologlcal appearance of  the  liver, was  the
 end point  evaluated.  In the  first study (Jaeger et  al. 1974),
 pretreatnent of rats with phenobarbltal resulted  in liver damage as
 measured by biochemical and histopathological parameters. Liver damage
 was not detected  In nonpretreated rats. The investigators suggested  that
 phenobarbital  had Induced the mixed-function oxidase  (MPO) system to
 enhance metabolism of vinyl chloride to a toxic Intermediate. In
 subsequent  experiments (Reynolds et al. 1975, Conolly  et al. 1978),
pretreatment with the polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) mixture Aroclor
 1254 was also observed to cause acute exposure to vinyl chloride to
result In hepatotoxiclty. The same mechanism, induction of hepatic MPO,

-------
                                                 Toxicological Daca   61

was suggested to result In oxidation of vinyl chloride to the epoxide,
2-chloroethylene oxide.
     Conolly and Jaeger (1978,  1979) Investigated the effect of
chemicals that regulate xenobiotic metabolism on vinyl-chloride-induced
hepatotoxicity. Trichloropropene oxide (TCPO),  which depletes
glutathione and inhibits epoxide hydrase conversion of an epoxide co ics
corresponding less-toxic alcohol, was found to enhance the toxic icy of
vinyl chloride in fasted PCB-pretreated rats, but not in fed pretreated
rats. Since nonprotein sulfhydryl concentrations in the liver in
TCPO-treated rats did not differ from those in control rats, the
investigators suggested that the enhanced toxicity in TCPO-treated rats
resulted from inhibition of epoxide hydrase rather than from glutathione
depletion. The lack of effect in fed rats was Judged to underscore the
importance of epoxide hydrase in the detoxification of epoxide  in
glutathione-depleted rats.
     In other parts of these same studies, cysteine, the rate-limiting
precursor of glutathione, was able  to block depletion of nonprotein
sulfhydryl in the liver and thus reduce the intensity of liver  toxicity
in PCB-pretreated, vinyl-chloride-exposed rats. Treatment of  fed rats
with diethylmaleate, another glutathione depleting agent, reduced  liver
nonprotein sulfhydryl  to levels attained in fasted rats, but  did not
increase hepatotoxicity.
     Several studies evaluated  the  interaction of ethanol with  vinyl
chloride, because ethanol has been  shown to  slow metabolism of  vinyl
chloride  in rats. Radike et al.  (1988) provided drinking water
containing 5% ethanol  to pregnant rats exposed concurrently to  vinyl
chloride  in the air on days 9-21 of gestation  in a perinatal
carcinogenesis  study.  The occurrence of angiosarcoma of  the liver,  lung,
and  muscle confirmed the  transplacental oncogenicity of vinyl chloride.
Exposure  to ethanol had no apparent effect on  the  incidence of
angiosarcoma. John et  al.  (1977) exposed  rats, mice,  and  rabbits to 15%
ethanol  in drinking water concurrently with  vinyl  chloride  in air  during
organogenesis.  The  investigators stated  that ethanol exacerbated some  of
the  fetal and  maternal effects  of vinyl  chloride.  The most  striking
effects  of ethanol were  a marked reduction in food intake,  ranging from
33%  (mice) to  83% (rabbits) compared with animals  exposed to vinyl
chloride alone,  and a  commensurate  reduction in maternal body weight
gain.

-------
                                                                      63
               5.   MANUFACTURE.  IMPORT,  USE,  AND DISPOSAL

5.1  OVERVIEW
     Vinyl chloride is produced at 11 locations in the United States.
During 1986, 8.439 billion Ib of this chemical were produced in the
United States. It is produced by thermal cracking of ethylene
dichloride. Vinyl chloride is used almost exclusively in the United
States for the production of polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and several
copolymers. These compounds yield a wide range of end-use products which
are used by industries and consumers.

5.2  PRODUCTION
     Domestic production of vinyl chloride during 1986 was 8.439 billion
Ib (USITC, 1987).  This required essentially all of the available
production capacity in 1986. In 1985, 7.8 billion Ib of vinyl chloride
was produced in the United States (C&EN 1987).
     Manufacturers and sites of production are as follows (SRI 1988):
Borden Chemical in Geismar, Louisiana; Dow Chemical in Oyster Creek,
Texas, and Plaquemine, Louisiana; Formosa Plastics in Baton Rouge,
Louisiana, and Point Comfort, Texas; Georgia-Gulf in Plaquemine,
Louisiana; BF Goodrich in Calvert City, Kentucky, and La Porte, Texas;
PPG Industries in Lake Charles, Louisiana; Occidental Chemical in Deer
Park, Texas; and Vista Chemical in Lake Charles, Louisiana.

     Vinyl chloride is produced commercially by thermal cracking of
ethylene dichloride (EDC). EDC used  in this process is made by either
direct chlorination of ethylene using liquid chlorine, or
oxychlorination of ethylene using dry hydrochloric acid and oxygen
(Cowfer and Magistro 1985). Vinyl chloride is usually supplied as a
liquid under pressure (IARC 1979). The technical grade product is
available  in 99.9% purity  (Sax and Lewis 1987).

5.3  IMPORT
     Imports of vinyl chloride were  -200 million Ib  in 1987  (C&EN 1987).

5.4  USES
     The use pattern for vinyl chloride  is as  follows  (CMR  1986a):
polyvinyl  chloride  (PVC),  85%; exports,  13%; and other, mostly copolymer
use, 2%. This use pattern  indicates  that vinyl  chloride monomer  is used
almost exclusively  in the  United  States by the  plastics  industry. Very
small amounts are used as  a refrigerant  gas and as an intermediate  in
the production of chlorinated compounds  (Curry and Rich  1980, Gosselin
et al. 1984,  IARC 1979).  Limited  quantities of vinyl  chloride were  used
in the United States as an aerosol propellant  and  as  an  ingredient  of

-------
64   Seccion 5

drug and cosmetic products; however, these practices have been
discontinued (EPA 1985b).

     Vinyl chloride is industrially important because of its inherent
flame retardant properties, its wide variety of end-use products, and
the low cost of producing polymers from vinyl chloride (Cowfer and
Magistro 1985). Principal end-use products include: PVC pipes, wire and
cable coatings, packaging materials, furniture and automobile
upholstery, wall coverings, housewares, and automotive parts and
accessories; vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate copolymer floor coverings,
phonographic records, and flexible film; vinyl chloride-acrylonitrile
battery cell separators; and vinyl chloride-vinylidine chloride
copolymer food packaging film (Curry and Rich 1980, Salkind and Pearlman
1978, Farkas 1980).

5.5  DISPOSAL

     EPA requires that persons who generate,  transport, treat, store, or
dispose of this compound comply with regulations of the Federal Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).  The recommended method of
disposal, reported by Sittig (1985), involves the incineration of this
chemical after mixing it with another combustible fuel. Care should be
taken to ensure that complete combustion has taken place in order to
avoid formation of phosgene.  An acid scrubber is required to remove HC1.
In addition to this method, other disposal techniques have been
developed for the recovery of vinyl chloride from PVC latexes (Sittig
1985).

-------
                                                                        65
                          6.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE

 6.1  OVERVIEW

      Information regarding the environmental fate and transport of vinyl
 chloride is limited. Effluents and emissions from vinyl chloride and PVC
 manufacturers are responsible for the majority of vinyl chloride
 released to the environment.  When released to the atmosphere  vinyl
 chloride is expected to be removed by reaction with photochemically
 generated hydroxyl radicals (half-life - 1.2 to 1.8 days). Reaction
 products include HC1, formaldehyde,  formyl chloride, acetylene
 chloroacetaldehyde,  chloroacetylchloranil, and chloroethylene 'in
 photochemical smog situations,  vinyl chloride has a half-life of 3 to
 7 h.  When released to water,  volatilization is expected to be the
 primary fate process (half-life - 8.7 to 43.3 h). In waters containing
 photosensitizers,  such as humic materials, sensitized photodegradation
 may also be important.  When released to soil, vinyl chloride will either
 volatilize  rapidly from soil  surfaces or leach readily through soil
 ultimately  entering  groundwater.

 6.2   RELEASES TO THE ENVIRONMENT

      The major source of release  of vinyl chloride to the  environment is
 believed to be emissions and  effluents from plastic industries
 (primarily  vinyl chloride and PVC manufacturers).  Vinyl  chloride
 released in wastewater  is expected to volatilize fairly  rapidly  (on the
 order of hours to  days)  into  the  atmosphere.  Other sources of release
 include  disposal of  vinyl chloride wastes in  landfills,  incomplete
 combustion  of PVC, tobacco  smoke,  spills,  and biodegradation of
 itoiahl™t?£ienef tetrachl°™«thylene,  and 1,1.1-trichloroethane  (IARC
 1979, HSDB  1987, Vakeman and Johnson  1978,  Wilson and Wilson 1985   Smith
 and Dragun  1984).  EPA estimated that  prior to 1975,  110  million  kg/year
 of vinyl chloride  escaped into the atmosphere from PVC production
 facilities  In  the United States (IARC 1979).  Worldwide emissions of
 vinyl chloride  into  the  atmosphere during 1982 was  -400  million  Ib
 (Hartnans et al. 1985).

 6.3  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE

 6.3.1  Air

     Based on a vapor pressure of  2,660 ma Hg at 25'C, essentially all
vinyl chloride in the atmosphere is expected  to exist  in vapor form
 (Verschueren 1983,  Eisenreich et al.   1981). Consequently,  removal  from
 the atmosphere by dry deposition is not expected to be an  important fate
process. Vinyl chloride has a relatively high partition  coefficient
between air and water (H - 50),  which suggests that significant  amounts

-------
 66   Section 6

 of vinyl chloride would not be  removed  from the atmosphere by vet
 deposition (EPA 1985b).

      Reaction of vinyl  chloride vapor with photochemically generated
 hydroxyl radicals is predicted  to be the primary degradation mechanism
 for this compound in the atmosphere. The half-life for  this reaction  in
 the typical atmosphere  has been -1.5 to 1.8 days (EPA 1985b). Products
 of this reaction are HC1,  formaldehyde, formyl chloride, carbon
 monoxide,  carbon dioxide,  chloroacetaldehyde, acetylene, chloroethylene,
 chloroacetylchloranil,  and H20  (EPA 1985b). In photochemical smog
 situations, the reaction half-life of vinyl chloride is predicted  to
 range between 3 and 7 h (HSDB 1987). Reaction with ozone (half-life -
 4.2 to 33 days), reaction with  oxygen atoms [0(3P>]  (half-life - 373  to
 532 days),  and direct photolysis are relatively insignificant
 degradation mechanisms  in the atmosphere (EPA 1985b).

 6.3.2  Water
      The primary loss process for vinyl chloride in  natural water
 systems is volatilization into  the atmosphere. The half-life for vinyl
 chloride volatilization from a  typical  pond, river,  and lake has been
 estimated to be 43.3, 8.7, and  34.7 h,  respectively. These values  are
 based on an experimentally determined reaeration rate ratio of -2  and
 assumed oxygen reaeration rates of 0.008, 0.04, and  0.01 hour"1  for a
 typical pond,  river, and lake,  respectively (EPA 1985b). Predicted
 half-lives should be considered rough estimates since the presence of
 various salts in natural water  systems  may affect the volatility of
 vinyl chloride significantly (EPA 1985b).  In waters  containing
 photosensitizers, such  as humic materials, photodegradation may be
 fairly rapid.  This suggests that in some waters sensitized
 photodegradation would  also be  a significant removal mechanism  (HSDB
 1987, EPA 1985b).

      Chemical hydrolysis of vinyl chloride does not  appear  to be
 environmentally important. The  hydrolytic half-life  for vinyl chloride
 has been estimated to be <10 years  (EPA 1985b). Vinyl chloride  is  not
 expected to oxidize chemically  by reaction with photochemically
 generated hydroxyl radicals, molecular  oxygen, or alkyl peroxy  radicals
 in natural water systems.  Limited available data on  the biodegradation
 of vinyl chloride indicate that this compound  is resistant  to microbial
 degradation under aerobic conditions  (EPA  1985b). Vinyl chloride  is not
 expected to adsorb significantly to suspended  solids and  sediments in
 water or bioaccumulate  significantly  in aquatic organisms  (HSDB  1987).

 6.3.3  Soil

      The relatively high vapor  pressure of vinyl chloride  (2,660 mm Hg
.at 25°C) indicates that this compound should volatilize quite  rapidly
 from dry soil surface.  The effective half-life  (due  to  volatilization)
 of vinyl chloride placed 10 cm  deep  in  dry soil  is predicted  to be 12 h
 (EPA 1985b). Evaporation from moist  soil  surfaces  is also  expected to be
 significant since this  compound does not  adsorb  strongly to soil and
 appears to volatilize fairly rapidly  from  water.

-------
                                                 Environmental Face   67

     Experimental data regarding adsorption of vinyl chloride to soil
were not located. Based on the regression equations given by Lyman et
al. (1982) and Sablj ic (1984), the soil adsorption coefficient (Koc) for
vinyl chloride has been estimated to range between 17 and 131. These KOC
values suggest that this compound would be highly mobile in soil. Thus,
vinyl chloride has the potential to leach into groundwater.

     Vinyl chloride is soluble in most common organic solvents (Cowfer
and Magistro 1983). In situations where organic contaminants exist in
relatively high concentrations (e.g.,  landfills, hazardous waste sites),
cosolvation of vinyl chloride could have the effect of reducing its
volatility, thus causing it to have even greater mobility than indicated
by its estimated
     Based on data in aquatic media,  chemical reaction of vinyl chloride
in soil does not appear to be a significant fate process, and it appears
that vinyl chloride would be resistant to biodegradation under aerobic
conditions.

-------
                                                                      69
                    7.  POTENTIAL FOR HUMAN EXPOSURE
7.1  OVERVIEW
     Anthropogenic sources are responsible for all of Che vinyl chloride
found in Che environment. Vinyl chloride has been found in at least 133
of 1,177 hazardous wasCe sices on Che National Priorities List (View
data base 1989). Mosc of Che vinyl chloride released to the environment
will eventually locate in the atmosphere while much smaller amounts will
eventually locate in groundwater. Vinyl chloride has been detected in
the ambient air in the vicinicy of vinyl chloride and PVC manufacturing
planes and hazardous waste sites. Vinyl chloride is expected to leach
into groundwater from spills, landfills, and industrial sources.
     Segments of Che general populaCion living in Che vicinicy of
emission sources are exposed Co vinyl chloride by inhalation of
contaminated air. Average daily intake of vinyl chloride by inhalation
for these people ranges from 'trace amounts to 2,100 pg/day. The average
daily intake of vinyl chloride by inhalation is expected to be
essentially zero for the remainder of the population. However, short-
term inhalation exposure to elevated levels may occur during use of new
cars. This is due to volatilization of vinyl chloride from vinyl
polymers within the car interior.
     The majority of Che general population is not expected to be
exposed to vinyl chloride through ingesCion of drinking water. However,
people who have PVC water pipes that have not been treated adequately to
remove vinyl chloride monomer may ingest -0.06 to 2.8 jig/day of vinyl
chloride from drinking water. The average daily intake of vinyl chloride
through diet is predicted to be essentially zero.
     NIOSH estimated that 27,000 workers are definitely exposed to vinyl
chloride and that workers probably exposed may be as many as
2.2 million. Intake is expected to occur primarily through inhalation
and less importantly by absorption through skin. Workplace air in some
PVC manufacturing plants was found to contain 100 to 800 mg/m3 (39 to
312 ppm) vinyl chloride with peak concentrations of up to 87,300 mg/m3
(34,000 ppm). A NIOSH survey of three vinyl chloride manufacturers
reported a time-weighted-average exposure of 0.18 to 70 mg/m3 (0.07 to
27 ppm) vinyl chloride in workplace air.

7.2  LEVELS MONITORED OR ESTIMATED IN THE ENVIRONMENT

7.2.1  Air

     Air in rural/remote and urban/suburban areas of the United States
typically contain no detectable amount of vinyl chloride (Stephens et
al. 1986; Grimsrud and Rasmussen 1975a,b; Harkov et al. 1984; Wallace et
al. 1984; EPA 1985b). Limited monitoring data indicate that in areas

-------
70   Section 7

near vinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride manufacturers, Che
concentration of vinyl chloride in air typically ranges from trace
levels to -105 pg/m3 (Gordon and Meeks 1977,  Pellizzari et al.  1979,
IARC 1979, EPA 1985b), but may exceed 2.600 pg/m3 (1 ppm) (Fishbein
1979). Elevated levels of vinyl chloride may also be found in the
vicinity of hazardous waste landfills. Concentrations ranging from below
detection limits to 5 to 8 pg/m3 (0.002 to 0.003 ppm) have been
monitored in the air above some landfills (Stephens et al. 1986,  Baker
and Mackay 1985).  Homes near a hazardous waste site in Southern
California were found to contain levels as high as 1,040 pg/m3  (0.4 ppm)
(Stephens et al. 1986).

     Typical values for the average daily intake of vinyl chloride by
inhalation in urban/suburban and rural/remote areas have been estimated
to be essentially zero. Assuming that the average intake of air is
20 m3/day, the average daily intake of vinyl chloride by people living
in source-dominated areas has been estimated to range from trace amounts
to 2,100 pg/day.

7.2.2  Water

     Vinyl chloride has been detected at varying concentrations in
surface, ground, and drinking waters throughout the United States (EPA
1985b). Concentrations as high as 9.8 pg/L in surface water, 380 Mg/L in
groundwater, and 10 Mg/L in drinking, water have been reported (Dyksen
and Hess 1982, HSDB 1987). There was no report in the literature of
vinyl chloride being detected in sediment.
     The level of vinyl chloride in groundwater in the United States was
determined during the 1982 EPA Groundwater Supply Survey. Water supplies
from 945 sites geographically located throughout the United States were
studied. Results indicate that vinyl chloride was positively identified
in only 0.74% of groundwater supplies (detection limit 1 pg/L). The
maximum concentration detected was 8.4 pg/L (Vestrick et al. 1984).
Other studies have also reported the occurrence of vinyl chloride in
groundwater throughout the United States at levels at or below 380 pg/L
(Cotruvo 1985, Goodenkauf and Atkinson 1986, Page 1981, Coniglio et al.
1980, Stuart 1983).

     The concentration of vinyl chloride in finished drinking waters  in
the United States was studied during  the 1976-1977 EPA National Organics
Monitoring Survey (NOMS). Only 2 samples out of 113 contained detectable
levels  (>0.1 pg/L), and these averaged 0.14 pg/L  (HSDB 1987). Results of
other studies also indicate that the majority of drinking water supplies
in the United States contain no detectable levels of vinyl  chloride
(HSDB 1987, Coniglio et al. 1980). Based on these studies,  it is  assumed
that  the average daily intake of vinyl chloride by  ingestion of drinking
water for most persons in the United States would be essentially  zero.
Estimates provided in  EPA (1985a)  indicate that 0.9% of  the United
States population is exposed to levels of vinyl chloride  in drinking
water il.O pg/L and 0.3% of the population is  exposed  to  levels >5 pg/L.

-------
                                       Potential for Human Exposure   71

7.2.3  Soil
     Monitoring data for vinyl chloride in soil were not located in the
available literature.

7.2.4  Other
     In the past, vinyl chloride had been detected in various foods as a
result of migration from polyvinyl chloride food wrappings and
containers (EPA 1985b).  Vinyl chloride has been found in vinegar at
levels up to 9.4 ppm,  in edible oils at 0.15 to 14.8 ppm, and in butter
at 0.05 ppm when these foods were packaged and stored in PVC containers
(IARC 1979). At present, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
regulates use of vinyl chloride polymers available for use in production
of articles intended to contact food. These articles include food-
packaging materials, coatings, plastisols, gaskets, and parts for food-
processing (see Sect.  9, Regulatory and Advisory Status). A recent study
on the migration of vinyl chloride from PVC under conditions closely
simulating actual food packaging and storage revealed that at very low
concentrations of vinyl chloride in PVC packaging material, there was
essentially zero migration of vinyl chloride (Kontominas et al. 1985).
     It is reported that migration of vinyl chloride from rigid PVC
water pipes into drinking water occurs and that it is directly
proportional to the residual level of vinyl chloride in the pipe itself.
Under certain conditions, reaction with chlorine in the water may result
in the complete removal of vinyl chloride from drinking water  (Fishbein
1979, Ando and Sayato 1984). During one study, it was found that
drinking water that ran through recently installed PVC pipes contained
vinyl chloride at 1.4 ng/'L, while water that ran through a 9-year-old
system contained 0.03 to 0.06 ftg/L (HSDB 1987). This is in agreement
with the conclusion of Berens and Daniels (1976) that PVC pipe
containing less than or equal to 1 ppm residual vinyl chloride monomer
would result in vinyl chloride concentrations of less than 2 pg/L under
any expected service conditions. This suggests that use of PVC pipe in
water distribution systems contributes to intake of vinyl chloride
through ingestion of contaminated drinking water. Assuming that the
average daily intake of water is 2 L, the average  intake of vinyl
chloride from water contaminated with vinyl chloride from PVC  pipes is
expected to range from 0.06 to 2.8 /jg/day.
     During an EPA study, detectable levels of vinyl chloride  monomer
(detection limit 0.05 ppm) were found in  two out of seven new  1975 model
cars. Levels of vinyl chloride in these two cars ranged  from 0.4  to
1.2 ppm. Ventilation of the car interiors led to the dissipation  of
vinyl chloride. The cars involved in this study had a high ratio  of
plastic to interior volume and were expected  to provide  worst-case
concentrations for vinyl chloride in interior car  air since  the source
of vinyl chloride was believed to be volatilization from vinyl plastics
(Hedley et al. 1976). Due  to  the limited  nature of this  data and  the
fact that this study  is somewhat dated, no conclusions  could be drawn
regarding levels of vinyl  chloride monomer  in interior  air of  cars
currently being produced.

-------
72   Section 7

     Vinyl chloride has been detected in tobacco smoke (EPA 1985b).
Cigarettes and little cigars have been found to contain 5.6 to 28 ng
vinyl chloride per cigarette (IARC 1979).

7.3  OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURES

     NIOSH estimates definite worker exposure to vinyl chloride to be
27,000 persons and probable worker exposure to be 2.2 million (Sittig
1985). This includes -5.000 workers employed in vinyl chloride
synthesis, 5,000 workers involved with polymerization processes,  and as
many as 350,000 workers associated with fabrication plants. Exposure is
believed to occur primarily through inhalation and less frequently by
absorption through skin (Sittig 1985). In the past, concentrations of
vinyl chloride in workplace air in some plants producing PVC have been
reported to range from 100 to 800 mg/m3 (39 to 315 ppm) with peak
concentrations up to 87,300 mg/m3 (34,000 ppm) (IARC 1979). Currently,
the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sets standards
for occupational exposure to vinyl chloride (see Sect. 9, Regulatory and
Advisory Status). A recent NIOSH survey of three vinyl chloride plants
indicated that the time-weighted-average exposure to vinyl chloride
varied between 0.2 to 70 mg/m3 (0.07 to 27 ppm) (IARC 1979).

7.4  POPULATIONS AT HIGH RISK

     Data were not located specifically regarding subpopulations
unusually sensitive to the effects of vinyl chloride. Individuals
located near or downwind of production facilities, hazardous waste
disposal sites, and landfills may potentially be exposed to higher
ambient atmospheric levels.

     Workers involved in the production or polymerization of vinyl
chloride may constitute a group at risk because of the potential for
occupational exposure. Since the mid 1970s, however, atmospheric levels
in the workplace have often been reduced to £l ppm (Fishbein 1979,
Kilian et al. 1975, Hansteen et al. 1978).

     Inhalation studies in animals demonstrated that exposure early in
life resulted in greater risk of developing cancer than did exposure
later in life (Drew et al. 1983). Although human studies that address
the effect of age on cancer risk were not located, the animal data
suggest that exposure during the younger years may result  in increased
cancer risk. Other animal studies suggest that prenatal exposure may
increase cancer risk (Maltoni et al. 1980, 1981; Radike et al. 1988).
Although human data were not located, the animal data may  suggest that
the prenatal exposure of humans to vinyl chloride may increase risk of
cancer.

     Animal studies have demonstrated that pretreatment with xenobiotics
or drugs that induce mixed-function oxidase (MFO) potentiates the
hepatotoxicity of vinyl chloride (Jaeger et al. 1974, Reynolds et al.
1975, Conolly et al. 1978). Although human data were not located, the
animal data suggest that human exposure to environmental pollutants or
drugs that induce MFO may result in increased sensitivity  to vinyl
chloride.

-------
                                                                      73
                         8.   ANALYTICAL METHODS

     A variety of methods are available for the analysis of vinyl
chloride in environmental and biological matrices. The methods of choice
will depend on the nature of the sample matrix; the required precision,
accuracy, and detection limit; the cost of analysis; and the turnaround
time of the methodology.  Preconcentration of samples may not only
increase the sensitivity but also, in certain instances, decrease the
time required for sample separation prior to quantification. The best
sensitivity and specificity for vinyl chloride quantification are
obtained with Hall detectors and photoionization detectors (Reding
1987). Mass spectrometry, although less sensitive than the most
sensitive detectors, is often used as a confirmatory tool for vinyl
chloride analysis. Details of analytical methodologies for vinyl
chloride are given in IARC (1978).

8.1  ENVIRONMENTAL MEDIA
     Some of the more commonly used analytical methods for the
quantification of vinyl chloride are given in Table 8.1. Other methods
that are less sensitive (e.g., infrared analyzer and continuous
monitoring instruments) and less commonly used (e.g., semiconductor
devices) are given in IARC (1978). Details of sample collection, sample
preservation, sample pretreatment, and quantification methods are
provided in the cited references in Table 8.1.

8.2  BIOMEDICAL SAMPLES

     The concentrations of vinyl chloride measured in environmental
samples may not reflect the concentration to which persons are exposed.
Proper biological monitoring not only can be used to support
environmental monitoring but also potentially may provide more accurate
data on exposure levels.  The two biological media that have been used
most extensively as promising indicators of vinyl chloride exposure are
breath and urine. A close agreement has been found between postexposure
breath concentrations and the ambient vinyl chloride levels in both
environmental and industrial conditions (Baretta et al. 1969, Tarkowski
1984). However, problems with quantification of low concentrations of
vinyl chloride in exhaled air at ambient air levels of <50 ppm has led
to limited application of this method (Tarkowski 1984).

     A reasonable correlation was noted between urinary output of
thiodiglycolic acid, the principal metabolite of vinyl chloride, and
ambient levels to which persons were exposed (Heger et al. 1982).
Measurement of urinary thiodiglycolic acid can be used as an  indicator
of vinyl chloride intake only as long as individual variability  in
metabolism due to such factors as liver disease, use of drugs, and
alcohol intake can be accounted for. Therefore, it appears  that  there

-------
74   Section 8

is no suitable biological medium that can be used as a reliable
indicator for vinyl chloride exposure (Tarkovski 1984).  The commonly
used methods for the quantification of vinyl chloride in biological
media are given in Table 8.1.

-------
i ta Ite fHMMaUta of ttayl cUortfe
Sflninle nuirii

•Ttnr*«fMffiAfli*l mir


Ambieol indoor and
outdoor air


Air

Air

Air



Automobile cxhiuil

Air

Air


Air


Dnnking water and
wafUwater

Groundwaier. liquid.
and Mild malncei

Sfinpiy. preparation
••" T m r^ f ••—•
Vinyl cblonde in air abaorbed in
activated carbon trap and deaolved
byCSj
Air containing vinyl ehlorido patted
through activated carbon trap and
deaolved by dichloramethaae or carbon
diuilfide
Adtorption on Tenax GC : thermal
dctorption
Grab tampk collected in electro-
poliihcd flBJnlfnt ftff 1 cunt
Air premiered by Na2S2O3-
trcaled glaai fiber filter wai
paued through tpherocarb adtorbent
cartridge and thermally deaorbed
Eihauit tamplet taken into aluininized
plattic bagt
Trapped in cold Tenax-GC trap, thermal
deaorption
Sample collected in preuunzed canuter
it patted through a freezeout loop
and subsequently healed
Sample collected in polyester-coated
plastic bagt concentrated by frccwout
and lubatquenlly healed
Purge and trap in Tenax GC. thermal
deaorption

Purge at 45°C and trap in Tenax GC,
thermal desorpuon

Quantification method'

GC/FID


GC/FID



HRGC/MS

GC/MS at uibambient
temperature
HRGC/FID and HRGC/MS



HRGC/FID

GC/FID

GC/ECD


GC/FID


GC/HSD, GC/MS
(EPA Method No 601 and 624)

GC/HSD (EPA Method No-8010)


Detection
limit

0.8 ppb
rr**

4 ppb



033 ppb

0005 ppb

0005 ppb



20 ppb
rr
NR

001 ppb


0006 ppb


OISppb(HSD)


0 18 ppb


Accuracy/
% recovery

94% at
04-26 pom

NR*



NR

NR

NR



NR

79- 104 at
6-60 ppb
NR


NR


102% at
082-323
ppb
102% at
0 82-32 3
ppb
Rcfcrencca

NIOSH 1984


IARC 1978. Miller
and Beuer 1985
*

Krosl el al. 1982

Gnmtrud and
Rasmuaten I975a,b
Harkov el al.
1983. 1984


Hasttnen el al.
1979
Ivea 197$

RaiDiuuco el al.
1977. Hartch el
al 1979
McMurry and Tarr
1978

EPA I982a.
APHA I98S

EPA I982b


                                                                     n
                                                                     to
                                                                      n
                                                                      n
                                                                      a-
                                                                      o
                                                                      ex

-------
                                                             Table 9.1  (eaatiancd)


Drinking water
Migration of
drinking water for
porynnyl pipoi
Water
Landfill gat
l™™

oyster
Food (orange drink,
wine, olive oil)
Breath
$Mmp|f» preparation
w w
Purge and trap in Tenax OC; thermal
Small MCtiofli put in water in tealed
Mmm vial for a number of dayi at 20°C;
tontion directly injected into a gat
Sample in eealed vial it equilibrated
gaiiajectediatoagafchroaiatograph
One hen landfill attee campled by PTFE
tubing inckfe drive-in pkaometen wai
abeorbed in Tenu OC aorbenl; trapped
liquid Nroooled loop aad flash deaorbed

gnt m ckaed loop injected into a gat
Sample eealed in viab and equilibrated
at 40*C for 2 b; headapace gat
Sample eealed in viab and equilibrated
at 40*C for a minimum of 2 h; headcpace
Cryogenic trapping of eioiied air. thermal
aeeorption mlo a gee chromatograpb
Detectioo
Quantififitkm method* limit

HRGC/Hall detector, HRGC/PID 0.04 ppb (Hall)
(EPA Method 502.2, 524.2) 0.02 (PID)
OC/HD NR
GC/HD <| ppb
OC/MS 0.04-0.8 ppm
OC/BCD 2 mA

teounent)
OC/FID NR
OC/HD I-S ppb
OC/HD. OC/ECD and OC/MS NR
Accuracy/

100-119 at
5-10 ppb
NR
NR
NR
NR

NR
NR
NR


Reding 1987
Ando and Seyalo
1984
IARC 1978
Young and Parker
1984

Cfaudy and Crotby
1977
IARC 1978
Cookie etaL
1975
Breath
Breath collected in Tedlar bag b

ooaceuralod by Ttanai OC

and thermally denrbed
OC/MS
PP>
77-110       Umana et aL 1985
                                                                                                                                    o\
                                                                                                                                                        A
                                                                                                                                                        n
                                                                                                                                                        n
                                                                                                                                                        i-

                                                                                                                                                        §

-------
Table 8.1  (i
Sample matrix
Whole blood.
plasma, and serum
Blood, urine
Urine
Tissue (liver,
lung, kidney.
brain)
Tissue
"GC - Gas chromi
capture detector: USD
Not reported.



Detection
Sample preparation Quantification method limit
Sample equilibrated in a sealed vial at GC/ECD
65°C, headspace gas injected into a
gas chromatograph
Sample purged and trapped in Teoax GC, GC/MS
thermally desorbed
Sample solvent extracted, extract GC/MS or HRGC/MS
methylated, and cleaned by ion-exchange
resin
Homogenized samples mixed with ethanol- GC/FID
water mixture equilibrated in a sealed
vial at 70°C. headspace gas injected into
a gas chromatograph
Sample mixed with a proteolytic enzyme GC/ECD
incubated at 65eC. headspace gas
analyzed
•momnhv HRflC « hiah-Ksolulion aas chromaloaraobv. FID •• (lame
HUJ||I'I|JIIJF, nnW%* III0U •l^RFilil.WM 0*** *«««»*«««™»W^B««|»»»J, • ««^ •••••••
"™ halide-sensitive detector* PID •" photoiomzation detector.




NR
Screening
method
50ppb
(urinary
thiodiglycobc
acid)
30ppb
NR
lomzation detection, MS ~




Accuracy/
% recovery References
NR Ramsey and •
Hanagan 1982
1
NR Balkon and Leary
1979
NR van Sitlert and
deJong 1985.
MUUer ct al.
1979
75-92% Zuccato el al.
1979
NR Ramsey and
Flannagan 1982
mass spectrometry; BCD — electron






to
PT
o
to
n
3-
o
a
o

-------
                                                                       79
                    9.   REGULATORY AND ADVISORY STATUS

 9.1  INTERNATIONAL

      Advisory guidance issued by the  World Health Organization (WHO)  for
 vinyl chloride was not located in the available literature.

 9.2  NATIONAL

 9.2.1  Regulations

 9.2.1.1  Air

      The  Occupational  Safety  and Health Administration (OSHA 1983)
 regulations for vinyl  chloride state  that  a worker must not  be exposed
 to  a  concentration of  >1 ppm  over any 8-h  period and that  a  worker must
 not be  exposed to  >5 ppm for  any period of time exceeding  15 minutes
 Direct  contact with liquid vinyl chloride  is prohibited.

      EPA  (1982c) has established emission  standards for vinyl chloride
 released  to the atmosphere by vinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride
 plants. Emissions  are  not to  exceed 10 ppm.

 9.2.1.2   Water

      Pursuant  to the Safe Drinking Water Act, EPA (1987c)  promulgated a
 maximum contaminant level (MCL)  for vinyl  chloride  of  0.002  mg/L,
 equivalent to  an estimated cancer  risk of  10'4.  This regulation is to
 become effective January 9, 1989.  and is to apply to all community
 drinking water systems that regularly serve the  same 25 persons for at
 least 8 months/year.

     Vinyl chloride is regulated under the Clean Water Act Effluent
 Guidelines for  the following  industrial point sources: steam electric.
 asbestos  industry, timber products processing, metal finishing, paving
 and roofing, paint formulating,  ink formulating,  gum and wood,  and
 carbon black (EPA 1988).

 9.2.1.3  Food

     The Food and Drug Administration (FDA 1986)  recently  proposed to
amend its regulations regarding  the vinyl chloride content of polymers
used in packaging materials or processing equipment for foods. Depending
on the nature of the polymer and Its use.  proposed vinyl chloride
content may range from 5 to 50 ppm.

-------
80   Section 9

9.2.1.4  Other

     EPA (1982d) has designated vinyl chloride as a hazardous
constituent of solid waste and requires that it be handled in accordance
with the regulations governing the same.  EPA (19874) lists a reportable
quantity (RQ) for vinyl chloride of 1 Ib,  but proposes that the RQ be
changed to 10 Ib. The RQ is the quantity that, if released to the
environment, must be reported immediately to the National Response
Center.

9.2.2  Advisory Guidance

9.2.2.1  Air

     The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists
(ACGIH 1986b) recommends a Threshold Limit Value (TLV)-TWA for vinyl
chloride of 5 ppm and a Short-Term Exposure Limit (STEL) of 10 ppm with
the notation that the compound is a recognized human carcinogen. The
National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH 1975)
concluded that a TLV for vinyl chloride was inappropriate because of its
carcinogenicity. NIOSH (1975) recommended that any workers exposed to
vinyl chloride should wear an air-supplied respirator.

9.2.2.2  Water

     An EPA (1980) study, based on an upper-bound human q.* of
1.74 x 10*2 (mg/kg/day)'1 calculated from the incidence of tumors in a
preliminary report of an inhalation study in rats (Maltoni and Lafemine
1975), estimated levels in ambient water of 20, 2, and 0.2 pg/L
associated with cancer risks of 10'5, 10'6, and 10'7, respectively,
assuming daily consumption of 2 L water and 6.5 g fish and shellfish.
For consumption of fish and shellfish alone, water concentrations of
5,246, 525, and 52.5 Mg/L correspond to cancer risk estimates of 10'5,
10'6, and 10'7, respectively. More recently, EPA (1985a, 1987b)
estimated that cancer risk levels of 10'*, 10'5, and 10'6 would result
from daily consumption of drinking water containing vinyl chloride at
1.5, 0.15, and 0.015 A*g/L. respectively,  using an upper-bound limit q*
value of 2.3 (mg/kg/day)-1.                                          L

     EPA (1985a, 1987a) promulgated health advisories for vinyl chloride
in drinking water. A 10-day health advisory of 2.6 mg/L was based on a
NOAEL of 30 mg/kg/day in a 13-week gavage study by Feron et al. (1975).
Because data were not sufficient for derivation of a 1-day health
advisory, the 10-day health advisory was adopted as a conservative 1-day
health advisory. Longer term health advisories of 0.013 mg/L for a 10-kg
child and 0.046 mg/L for an adult were estimated from the NOAEL of
0.13 mg/kg/day in a lifetime dietary study in rats (Til et al. 1983).

9.2.3  Data Analysis

9.2.3.1  Reference doses (RfDs)

     Reference doses for vinyl chloride have not been estimated by EPA.

-------
                                     Regulatory and Advisory Status   81

9.2.3.2  Carcinogenic potency

     Vinyl chloride has been classified in IARC Group 1 (IARC 1987) and
EPA Class A (EPA 1987a).  By either classification scheme, the
designations have the same meaning, that evidence is sufficient to
consider vinyl chloride carcinogenic to humans. EPA has derived several
estimates of carcinogenic potency for vinyl chloride for both oral and
inhalation exposure. In an early estimate, EPA (1980) derived a q * for
human oral exposure of 1.74 x 10"2 (mg/kg/day)*^ based on preliminary
reports of the incidence of total tumors in rats of both sexes exposed
to vinyl chloride by inhalation at concentrations up to 10,000 ppm
(Maltoni and Lefemine 1975).  A subsequent estimate of potency for oral
exposure is 2.3 (mg/kg/day)'*•,  which appears in EPA (1987a) and
represents the most recent analysis. This estimate was based on the
incidence of lung and liver tumors in both sexes of rats exposed for
lifetime to diets that contained vinyl chloride (Feron et al. 1981).

     The first estimate for carcinogenic potency by inhalation exposure.
2.5 x 10*2 (mg/kg/day)*1 derived in EPA (1984), was based on the same
preliminary inhalation data (Maltoni and Lefemine 1975) that was used as
the basis of the EPA (1980) oral estimate. A more recent estimate of
2.95 x 10*1 (mgAg/day)'1 (EPA 1985b) was based on the final report of
the incidence of liver angiosarcomas in male and female rats exposed for
up to 1 year to concentrations up to 30,000 ppm (Maltoni et al. 1980,
1981).

9.3  STATE

     No state guidelines were available.

-------
                                                                      33
                            10.   REFERENCES


ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists).
1986a. Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values and Biological
Exposure Indices, 5th ed.  Cincinnati, Ohio: ACGIH, pp. 623-626.

ACGIH (American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists).
1986b. Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances in the Work
Environment Adopted by ACGIH with Intended Changes for 1986-87.
Cincinnati, Ohio: ACGIH, p. 33.

Amoore JE, Hautala E. 1983. Odor as an aid to chemical safety:  Odor
thresholds compared with threshold limit values and volatilities for
214 industrial chemicals in air and water dilution. J Appl Toxicol
3:272-290.

Anderson D, Richardson CR. 1981. Issues relevant to the assessment  of
chemically induced chromosome damage in vivo and their relationship to
chemical mutagenesis. Mutat Res 90:261-272.

Anderson D, Hodge MCE, Purchase IFH. 1976. Vinyl chloride: Dominant
lethal studies in male CD-I mice. Mutat Res 40:359-370.

Anderson D, Richardson CR, Veight TM, Adams WG. 1980. Chromosomal
analyses in vinyl chloride exposed workers. Results from analysis 18 and
42 months after an initial sampling. Mutat Res 79:151-162.

Andrews AV, Zawistowski ES, Valentine CR. 1976. A comparison of the
mutagenic properties of vinyl chloride and methyl chloride. Mutat Res
40:273-275.

Ando M, Sayato Y. 1984. Studies on vinyl chloride migration into
drinking water from polyvinyl chloride pipe and reaction between vinyl
chloride and chlorine. Vater Res 18(3):315-318.

APHA  (American Public Health Association). 1985. AWVA  (American Water
Works Association)/WPCF (Vater Pollution Control Federation). Standard
Methods for the Examination of Uater and Uastewater,  16th ed.
Washington, D.C.: APHA, pp. 591-602.

Baker LW, MacKay KP. 1985. Hazardous waste management. Screening models
for estimating toxic air pollution near a hazardous waste landfill. J
Air Pollut Control Assoc 35(11):1190-1195.
* Key studies.

-------
84   Section 10

Balkon J, Leary JA. 1979. An Initial report on a comprehensive,
quantitative screening procedure for volatile compounds of forensic and
environmental interest in human biofluids by GC/MS.  J Anal Toxicol
3:213-215.

Barb in A, Besson F, Perrard MH, et al.  1985a.  Induction of specific
base-pair substitutions in E. coli trpA mutants by chloroethylene oxide,
a carcinogenic vinyl chloride metabolite. Mutat Res 152:147-156.

Barbin A, Laib RJ , Bartsch H. 1985b. Lack of miscoding properties of
7-(2-oxoethyl)guanine, the major vinyl chloride-DNA adduct. Cancer Res
45:2440-2444.

Baretta ED, Stewart RD, Mutchler JE. 1969. Monitoring exposures  to vinyl
chloride vapor; breath analysis and continuous air sampling. Am  Ind Hyg
Assoc J 30:537 (cited in Tarkowski 1984).

Barnes D, Bellin J, DeRosa C, et al. 1987. Reference Dose (RfD) :
Description and use in health risk assessments. Appendix A of the
Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Washington, D.C. : Office of
Health and Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development.
EPA 600/8-86-0321.

Bartsch H. 1976. Predictive value of mutagenicity tests in chemical
carcinogenesis. Nutat Res 38:177-190.

Bartsch H, Malaveille C, Montesano R. 1975. Human, rat and mouse liver-
mediated mutagenicity of vinyl chloride  in S. typhimuriuo strains. Int J
Cancer 15:429-437.

Bartsch H, Malaveille C, Montesano R. 1976. The predictive value of
tissue -mediated mutagenicity assays to assess the carcinogenic risk of
chemicals. IARC Sci Publ 12:467-491.

Berens AR, Daniels CA. 1976. Prediction  of vinyl chloride monomer
migration from rigid PVC pipe. Polymer Engineering and Science
Berk PD.  1976. Vinyl chloride-associated liver disease. Ann Int Med
84:717-731  (cited  in EPA  1985a) .

* Bi W, Wang Y, Huang M,  Meng D. 1985. Effect of vinyl chloride on
testis  in rats. Ecotoxicol  Environ Saf 10(2) :281-289.

Bogdanikowa B, Zawilska J.  1984. Immune complexes in  the serum of
patients  occupationally exposed to vinyl chloride. Przeglad Lekarski
41(3):253-257.

Bolt HM.  1986. Metabolic  activation of vinyl chloride, formation of
nucleic acid adducts and  relevance to carcinogenesis.  IARC Sci Publ
70:261-268.

-------
                                                          References   85

 Bolt HM, Kappus H, Buchter A, Bolt W. 1976a. Disposition of (1,214C)
 vinyl chloride in the rat. Arch Toxicol 35:153-162 (cited in EPA 1985b).

 Bolt HM, Kappus H, Kaufmann R,  et al. 1976b. Metabolism of 14C-vinyl
 chloride in vitro and in vivo.  INSERM Symposia Series,  IARC Scientific
 Publications N 13. INSERM 52:151-164.J

 Bolt HM, Laib RJ, Kappus H,  Buchter A. 1977. Pharmacokinetics of vinyl
 chloride in the rat.  Toxicology 7(2):179-188.

 Bryen D, Engholn G,  England A,  Westerholm P. 1976.  Mortality and cancer
 morbidity in a group of Swedish VCM and PCV production  workers.  Environ
 Health Perspect 17:167-170 (cited In EPA 1985b).

 Buchancova J,  Reznak I,  Horak V,  Altaann P,  Svehlova L,  Suchova E,
 Sraokova E.  1985. Scintigraphic pictures of the  liver in workers after a
 long-term exposure to vinyl  chloride.  Praeov Lek 37(6):190-194.

 Buchter A,  Bolt HM, Kappus H, Bolt W.  1977.  Tissue  distribution of
 1.2-14C-vinyl  chloride in the rat.  Int Arch Occup Environ Health
 39(l):27-32.  (In German,  English abstract.)

 Buchter A,  Filser JG,  Peter  H.  Bolt HM.  1980.  Pharmacokinetics  of vinyl
 chloride in the rhesus monkey.  Toxicol Lett 6(1):33-36.

 C&EN (Chemical  and Engineering  News).  1987.  Key  Chemicals:  Vinyl
 Chloride.  65(1):10.

 Chudy JC,  Crosby  NT.  1977. Some  observations on  the determination of
 monomer residues  in foods. Food Cosmet Toxicol 15:547-551.

 CMR  (Chemical Marketing Reporter).  1986a. Chemical  Profile:  Vinyl
 Chloride. June  2,  1986. New York, N.Y.:  Schnell  Pub.  Co.

 CMR  (Chemical Marketing Reporter).  1986b. Chemical  Profile:  Polyvinyl
 Chloride. June  9,  1986. New York, N.Y.:  Schnell  Pub.  Co.

 Coniglio WA, Miller K, MacKeever D.  1980. The occurrence  of volatile
 organics in drinking water. Criteria and Standards  Division.  Science and
 Technology Branch. Exposure Assessment  Project.

 Conkle JP, Camp BJ, Welch BE. 1975. Trace composition of  human
 respiratory gas. Arch  Environ Health 30:290-295.

 Conolly RB, Jaeger RJ. 1978. Effects of  cysteine, diethylmaleate  and
 trichloropropane oxide on acute vinyl chloride hepatotoxicity  Toxicol
Appl Pharmacol 45(1):338.

Conolly RB, Jaeger RJ. 1979.  Acute hepatotoxicity of  vinyl  chloride and
ethylene; modification by trichloropropane oxide, diethylmaleate, and
cysteine. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 50:523-531.

-------
86   Seccion 10

Conolly RB, Jaeger RJ, Szabo S. 1978. Acute hepatotoxiclty of ethylene,
vinyl fluoride, vinyl chloride, and vinyl bromide after Aroclor 1254
pretreatment. Exp Mol Pathol 28:25-33.

Cotruvo JA. 1985. Organic nficropollutants in drinking water.  Sci Total
Environ 47:7-26.

Cotti G, Balglmigli L, Mandrioli A. Maltoni C.  1983.  Suitable models for
long-term bioassays of therapeutic and toxic effects  of antiblastic
drugs: Brain tumors of neuronal cells and primitive bipotential
precursors produced in Sprague-Davley rats by vinyl chloride. Dev Oncol
15:376-378.

Cowfer JA, Magistro AJ. 1983. Vinyl Chloride. In Kirk-Othmer
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. Vol. 23. New York, N.Y.: Wiley
Interscience, pp. 865-885.

Cowfer JA, Magistro AJ. 1985. Vinyl polymers: Vinyl chloride. In Kirk-
Othmer Concise Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. New York, N.Y.: John
Wiley and Sons, Inc., pp. 1229-1230.

Curry S, Rich S. 1980. The Kline Guide to the Chemical Industry. 4th
ed., Fairfield, N.Y.: Charles H. Kline and Co.

de Meester C, Duverger-van Bogaert M, Lambotte-Vandepaer M, et al. 1980.
Mutagenicity of vinyl chloride in the Ames test. Possible artifacts
related to experimental conditions. Mutat Res 77:175-179.

Dinceva E, Kolev P, Dalbokova D. 1985. EEC changes in workers exposed to
long-term combined effect of a mixture of organic solvents and vinyl
chloride. Khig Zdraveopaz 29(1):8-15. (In Russian: English abstract).

Dtnman BO, Cook WA, Whicehouse WM, Magnuson HJ,  Dltcheck T. 1971.
Occupational acroosteolysis. I. An epldemiological study. Arch Environ
Health 22:61-73.

Doll R. 1987. Effects of exposure to vinyl chloride:  An assessment of
the evidence. Unpublished study commissioned by ICI,  BP, Norsk Hydro,
Dow Chemical and B.F. Goodrich.                             v

Doss M, Lange CE, Veltman G. 1984. Vinyl chloride-induced hepatic
coproporphyrinuria with transition to chronic hepatic porphyria. Klin
Wochenschr 62(4):175-178.

Dow Chemical Company. 1988. Comments of the Dow Chemical Company on
ATSDR's Toxicological Profile for Vinyl Chloride. Midland, Mich.
April 21, 1988.

Downs TD, Stallones RA, Frankowskl RF. Labarthe DR. 1977. Vinyl
chloride, birth defects, and fetal wastage. A critical review.
Unpublished study prepared by Research Statistics, Inc. for The Society
of Plastic Industries, Inc.

-------
                                                          References    87

 Drevon C,  Kurokl T.  1979.  Mutagenicity of vinyl chloride,  vinylidene
 chloride and chloroprene  in V79  Chinese hamster cells   Mutat  Res
 67:173-182.

 Drew RT,  Boorman tJA,'Haseman JK, McConnell EE,  Busey WM,  Moore JA.
 1983.  The  effect of  age and exposure  duration on cancer induction by a
 known carcinogen in  rats,  mice,  and hamsters. Toxicol Appl Phannacol
 68:120-130.

 Ducatman A,  Hirschhorn K,  Selikoff IJ.  1975. Vinyl chloride exposure and
 human chromosome aberrations. Mutat Res  31:163-168.

 Duprat P,  Fabry  JP, Gradiski D, Magadur  JL. 1977. Metabolic approach to
 industrial poisoning: Blood kinetics  and distribution of  14C-vinyl
 chloride  (VCM).  Acta Pharmacol Toxicol  Suppl (Kbh) 41(1):142-143 (cited
 in  EPA 1985b).

 Dyksen JE, Hess  AF, III. 1982. Alternatives for  controlling organics in
 groundwater  supplies. J Am Water Works Assoc 74:394-403.

 Edmonds LD,  Falk H, Nissim JE. 1975.  Congenital  malformations and vinyl
 chloride.  Lancet 11:1098.

 Edmonds LD,  Anderson CE, Flynt Jtf. James  LM. 1978. Congenital central
 nervous system malformations and vinyl chloride  monomer exposure: A
 community  study.  Teratology 17:137-142.

 Eisenreich SJ, Looney BB,  Thornton JD. 1981. Airborne organic
 contaminants in  the Great  Lakes ecosystem. Environ Sci  Technol
 15(l):30-38.

 Elmore JD, Wong  JL, Laumbach AD,  Streips UN. 1976. Vinyl chloride
 mutagenicity via the metabolites chlorooxirane and chloroacetaldehyde
 monomer hydrate.  Biochem Biophys Acta 442(3):405-419 (cited in EPA
 1985b).

 EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1980. Ambient Water Quality
 Criteria Document for Vinyl Chloride.  Cincinnati, Ohio: Environmental
 Criteria and Assessment Office.  EPA 440/5-80-078. NTIS  PB  81-117889.

 EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1982a.  Methods for Organic
 Chemical Analysis of Municipal and Industrial Wastewater. Test Method:
 Purgeable Halocarbons - Method 601 and Purgeable  - Method  624. EPA
 Report 600/4-82-057,  Environmental Monitoring and Support  Laboratory,
 EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio,  pp. 601-1 to 601-10 and 624-1 to 624-12.

 EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 1982b.  Test Methods for
 Evaluating Select Waste.  Physical/Chemical Methods. Method 8010 -
Halogenated Volatile Organics.  Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response. EPA, Washington. D.C.,  pp.  8010-1 to 8010-12.

-------
88   Section 10

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).  1982c.  Emission standard for
ethylene dichloride, vinyl chloride, and polyvinyl choride.  40 CFR
61.65.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).  19824.  Identification and listing
of hazardous waste. 40 CFR 261, Append VIII.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).  1984. Health Effects  Assessment
for Vinyl Chloride. Cincinnati, Ohio: Environmental Criteria and
Assessment Office. EPA 540/1-86-036.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).  1985a.  Drinking Water Criteria
Document for Vinyl Chloride. Washington, D.C.:  Office of Drinking Water,
EPA. NTIS PB86-118320.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).  1985b.  Health and Environmental
Effects Profile for Chloroethene. Cincinnati,  Ohio: Environmental
Criteria and Assessment Office. ECAO-CIH-P155.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).  1986. The Total Exposure
Assessment Methodology (TEAM) Study. Final report. Washington, D.C.:
Office of Research and Development, Environmental Monitoring Systems
Division. RTI/2391/00-03 F.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).  1987a.  Vinyl Chloride Health
Advisory. Draft. Washington, D.C.:  Office of Drinking Water.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).  1987b.  Graphical Exposure
Modelling System (GEMS). CLOGP. Online. Washington, D.C.: EPA, Office of
Toxic Substances.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).  1987c.  National primary drinking
water regulations - synthetic organic chemicals; monitoring for
unregulated contaminants; final rule. Fed Regist 52(130):25690-25717.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).  1987d.  Reportable quantity
adjustments. Fed Regist 52(50):8140-8186.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency).  1988.  Analysis of Clean Water Act
Effluent Guidelines Pollutants. Summary of the Chemicals Regulated by
Industrial Point Source Category 40 CFR Parts  400-475. Draft. Prepared
by the Industrial Technology Division (WH 552) . Office of Water
Regulations and Standards, Office of Water, EPA, Washington, D.C.

Farkas DF. 1980. Food Processing. In Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of
Chemical Technology, Vol. 11. New York, N.Y.:  John Wiley & Sons,
pp. 180-181.

FDA (Food and Drug Administration). 1986. Proposed uses of vinyl
chloride polymers. Fed Regist 51(22):4177-4185.

-------
                                                         References   89

Feron VJ, Kroes R. 1979. One-year time-sequence inhalation toxicity
study of vinyl chloride in rats. II. Morphological changes in the
respiratory tract, ceruminous glands, brain, kidneys, heart and spleen.
Toxicology 13(2):131-141.

* Feron VJ, Speek AJ, Villems MI, Van Buttaum D, Groot AP. 1975.
Observations on the oral administration and toxicity of vinyl chloride
in rats. Food Cosmet Toxicol 13(6):633-638.

Feron VJ, Spit BJ, Immel HR, Kroes R. 1979a. One-year time-sequence
inhalation toxicity study of vinyl chloride in rats. III. Morphological
changes in the liver. Toxicol 13:143-154.

Feron VJ, Kruysse A, Til HP. 1979b.  One-year time-sequence inhalation
toxicity study of vinyl chloride in rats. I. Growth, mortality,
haematology, clinical chemistry, and organ weights. Toxicol 13:25-35.

* Feron VJ, Hendriksen CFM, Speek AJ, Til HP, Spit BJ. 1981. Lifespan
oral toxicity study of vinyl chloride in rats. Food Cosmet Toxicol
19(3):317-333.

Filser JG, Bolt HM. 1979. Pharmacokinetics of halogenated ethylenes in
rats. Arch Toxicol 42(2):123-136.

Fishbein L. 1979. Potential halogenated industrial carcinogenic and
mutagenic chemicals. I. Halogenated unsaturated hydrocarbons. Sci Total
Environ 11:111-161.

Fox AJ, Collier PF. 1977. Mortality experience of workers exposed to
vinyl chloride monomer in the manufacture of polyvinyl chloride in Great
Britain. Br J Ind Med 34:110.

Funes-Cravioto F, Lambert B, Lindsten J, et al. 1975. Chromosome
aberrations in workers exposed to vinyl chloride. Lancet 1:459.

Gedigk P, Muller R, Bechtelsheimer H. 1975. Morphology of liver damage
among polyvinyl chloride production workers. A report on 51 cases. Ann
NY Acad Sci 246:279-285.

Geryk E, Zudova Z. 1986. Vinyl chloride as occupational health hazard.
Pracov Lek 38(1):l-8. (Czech: English translation).

Goodenkauf 0, Atkinson JC. 1986. Occurrence of volatile organic
chemicals in Nebraska groundwater. Ground Water 24(2):231-233.

Gordon SJ, Meeks SA. 1977. A study of gaseous pollutants in the Houston,
Texas area. AICHE Symp Ser 73:84-94.

Gosselin RE. Smith RP, Hodge HC. 1984. Clinical Toxicology of Commercial
Products, 5th ed.  Baltimore, Md.: Williams and Vilkins, p. 11-166.

Green T, Hathway DE. 1975. The biological fate in rats of vinyl chloride
in relation to its oncogenicity. Chen Biol Interact 11:545-562.

-------
90   Section 10

Green T, Hathway DE. 1977. The chemistry and biogenesis of the
S-containing metabolites of Vinyl chloride in rats.  Chem Biol Interact
17:137-150.

Green T, Hathway DE. 1978. Interactions of vinyl chloride with rat-liver
DNA in vivo. Chem Biol Interact 22:211-224.

Greim H, Bonse G, Radwan Z, Reichert D, Henschler D.  1975. Mutagenicity
in vitro and potential carcinogenicity of chlorinated ethylenes as a
function of metabolic oxirane formation.  Biochem Pharmacol 24:2013-2017.

Grimsrud EP, Rasmussen RA. 1975a. The analysis of chlorofluorocarbons in
the troposphere by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Atmos Environ
9:1010-1013.

Grimsrud EP, Rasmussen RA. 1975b. Survey and analysis of halocarbons in
the atmosphere by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Atmos Environ
9:1014-1017.

Guengerich FP, Uatanabe PG. 1979. Metabolism of (14C)- and (36C1>-
labeled vinyl chloride in vivo and in vitro.  Biochem Pharmacol
28:589-596.

Guengerich FP, Crawford WM Jr, Watanabe PG.  1979. Activation of vinyl
chloride to covalently bound metabolites: Roles of 2-chloroethylene
oxide and 2-chloroacetaldehyde. Biochemistry 18:5177-5182.

Guengerich FP, Mason PS, Stott VJ, Fox TR, Vatanabe PG. 1981. Roles of
2-haloethylene oxide and 2-haloacetaldehydes derived from vinyl bromide
and vinyl chloride in irreversible binding to protein and DNA. Cancer
Res 41:4391-4398.

GwInner LM, Laib RJ, Filser JG. Bolt HM. 1983. Evidence of
chloroethylene oxide being the reactive metabolite of vinyl chloride
towards DNA: Comparative studies with 2,2' -dichlorodiethyl ether.
Carcinogenesis 4:1483-1486.

Halama J, Becker-Stone S, Halama JM. 1985. Das haemangiosarkom der bei
arbeitern in der PVC-Industrie and andere VC-bedingte erkrankungen mit
angiologish-dermatologischer, heptalogischer, radiologischer and
neurologischer symptomatik. Der Radiolog 25(l):22-29.  (In German,
English abstract.)

* Hansteen IL, Hillestad L, Thiis-Evensen E, Heldaas SS.  1978. Effects
of vinyl chloride in man: A cytogenetic follow-up study. Mutat Res
51:271-278.

Harkov R, Kebbekus B, Bozzelll JV, Lioy PJ. 1983. Measurement of
selected volatile organic compounds at three locations  in New Jersey
during the summer season. J Air Pollut Control Assoc 33:1177-1183.

-------
                                                         References   91

Harkov R, Kebbekus B,  Borielli JV,  Lioy PJ,  Daisey J.  1984.  Comparison
of selected volatile organic compounds during the summer and winter at
urban sites in New Jersey.  Sci Total Environ 38:259-274.

Harsch DE, Cronn DR, Slater WR. 1979.  Expanded list of halogenated
hydrocarbons measurable in aabient air. J Air Pollut Control Assoc
29:975-976.

Hartmans S, Bont JAM,  Tramper J,  Luyben KChAM.  1985. Bacterial
degradation of vinyl chloride. Biotech Letters 7(6):383-386.

Hatch M, Kline J, and Stein Z. 1981. Power considerations in studies of
reproductive effects of vinyl chloride and some structural analogs.
Environ Health Perspect 41:195-201.

Hasanen E, Soininen V, Pyysalo H, Leppamaki E.  1979. On the  occurrence
of aliphatic chlorine and bromine compounds in automobile exhaust. Atmos
Environ 13:1217-1219.

Heath CW Jr. Fable H,  Creech JL Jr. 1975. Characteristics of cases of
angiosarcoma of the livers among vinyl chloride workers in the United
States. Ann NY Acad Sci 246:231-236.

Hedley WH. Cheng JT, McCormick RJ, Lewis WA. 1976. Sampling of
Automobile Interiors for Vinyl Chloride Monomer. EPA-600/2-76-124. NTIS
PB-258648.

Hefner RE Jr, Watanabe PG,  Gehring PJ. 1975a. Percutaneous absorption of
vinyl chloride. Toxicol Appl Pharnacol 34:529-532.

Hefner RE Jr, Watanabe PG,  Gehring PJ. 1975b. Preliminary studies of the
fate of inhaled vinyl chloride monomer in rats. Ann NY Acad Sci
246:135-148.

Heger M, Muller G, Norpath K.  1982. Untersuchungen zur  Beziehung
zwischen Vinylchlorid (VCM) - Aufnalsine und Metabolitenausscheidung bei
15 VCM-Exponierten. Int Arch Occup Environ Health  50:187  (cited in
Tarkowski 1984).

Hehir RM, McNamara BP. McLaughlin J Jr, Willigan DA, Bierbower G,
Hardisty JF. 1981. Cancer induction following single and  multiple
exposures to a constant amount of vinyl chloride monomer. Environ Health
Perspect 41:63-72.

Heldaas SS, Langard SL, Andersen A. 1984. Incidence of  cancer among
vinyl chloride and polyvinyl  chloride  workers.  Br  J Ind Med 41:25-30.

* Hong CB, Winston JM, Thomburg LP,  Lee CC. 1981.  Follow-up  study on
the carcinogencity of vinyl chloride  and vinylidene chloride  in rats  and
mice: Tumor incidence and mortality subsequent  to  exposure. J Toxicol
Environ Health 7:909-924.

-------
92   Section 10

HSDB (Hazardous Substances Data Bank).  1987.  National Library of
Medicine Report 169. Online: September 1987.

Huberman E, Bartsch H, Sachs I. 197S. Mutation induction in Chinese
hamster V79 cells by two vinyl chloride metabolites,  chloroethylene
oxide and 2-chloroacetaldehyde. Int J Cancer 16:639-644.

Hultmark D, Sundh K, Johansson L, Arrhenius E. 1979.  Ethanol inhibition
of vinyl chloride metabolism in isolated rat hepatocytes.  Chem Biol
Interact 25(1):l-6.

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 1978.  Methods for
the measurement of vinyl chloride in poly(vinyl chloride), air, water,
and foodstuffs. In Environmental Carcinogens Selected Methods of
Analysis. Egan H, Squireel DCM, Thain W, Davis U, eds. IARC Sci Pub No
22.

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 1979.  Monographs on
the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals in Humans. Vinyl
chloride, polyvinyl chloride and vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate polymers.
Lyons, France: World Health Organization, IARC 19:377-401; 419-438.

IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). 1987.  Vinyl
Chloride. In:  IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to
Humans. Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity: An Updating of IARC
Monographs Vol. 1 to 42. Lyons, France: World Health Organization, IARC
Suppl 7:373-376.

Infante PF. 1976. Oncogenic and mutagenic risks  in communities with
polyvinyl chloride production  facilities. Ann NY Acad Sci  271:49-57.

Infante PF, Wagoner JK, McMichael AJ. Waxweiler RJ, Falk H. 1976.
Genetic risks  of vinyl chloride. Lancet  (April 3)  734-735.

Ives NF. 1975. Sensitive  trapping and gas chromatographic  method  for
vinyl chloride in air samples. J Assoc Off Anal  Chem  58:457-460.

Jaeger RJ, Reynolds ES, Conolly RB,  Moslen MT, Szabo  S, Murphy SD. 1974.
Acute hepatic  injury by vinyl  chloride  in rats pretreated with
phenobarbital. Nature 252(5485):724-726.

Jaeger RJ. Murphy  SD, Reynolds ES,  Szabo S,  Moslen MT.  1977.  Chemical
modification  of  acute hepatotoxicity of  vinyl chloride  monomer in rats.
Toxicol Appl  Pharmacol 41:597-607.

Jedrychowski  RA, Sokal JA,  Chaielnicka J.  1984.  Influence of exposure
mode on vinyl  chloride action. Arch Toxicol  55(3):195-198.

Jenssen D, Ramel C.  1980.  The  micronucleus  test  as part of a short-term
mutagenicity  test  program for  the  prediction of  carcinogenicicy
evaluated by  143 agents  tested.  Mutat  Res  75:191-202.

-------
                                                         References   93

John JA, Smith FA, Leong BKJ, Schvetz BA. 1977. The effects of
maternally inhaled vinyl chloride on embryonal and fetal development in
mice, rats, and rabbits. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 39:497-513.

June VS. Lange CE, Stein G, Veltman G. 1974. Uber die sog.
Vinylchloridkrankheit. Beruff.Dermatosen 22:4-22. (In German, English
abstract.)

Kappus H, Bolt HM, Buchter A, Bolt V. 1976. Liver microsomal uptake of
[14C] vinyl chloride and transformation to protein alkylating
metabolites in vitro. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 37:461-471.

Katsova LD, Pavlenko GI. 1985. Cytogenetic examination of the workers of
chemical industry. Mutat Res 147:301-302.

Keplinger ML. Goode JV, Gordon DE, Calandra JC. 1975. Interim results of
exposure of rats, hamsters, and mice to vinyl chloride. Ann NY Acad Sci
246:219-224.

Kilian DJ,  Picciano DJ, Jacobson CB. 1975. Industrial monitoring: A
cytogenic approach. Ann NY Acad Sci 269:4-11.

Kontominas MG, Gupta C, Gilbert SG. 1985. Interaction of vinyl chloride
with polyvinyl chloride in model food systems by HPLC chromatography:
Migration aspects. Lebensm-Visa u-Technol 18(6):353-356.

Krajewski J,  Dobecki M, Gromiec J. 1980. Retention of vinyl chloride in
the human lung.  Br J Ind Ned 37(4):373-374.

Krost KJ, Pellizzari ED. Valburn SG, Hubbard SA. 1982. Collection and
analysis of hazardous organic emissions. Anal Chem 54:810-817.

Kucerova M, Polivkova Z. Batora J. 1979. Comparative evaluation of the
frequency of chromosomal aberrations and the SCE numbers in peripheral
lymphocytes of workers occupationally exposed to vinyl chloride monomer.
Mutat Res 67:97-100.

Laib RJ. Bolt HM. 1977. Alkylation of RNA by vinyl chloride metabolites
in vitro and in vivo: Formation of l-N-6-ethenoadenoslne. Toxicology
8:185-195.

Laib RJ, Barbln A. Bartsch H. 1984. Evidence that vinyl chloride alters
the fidelity of replication: Studies with chloroethylene oxide treated
poly(dG-dC).  Naunyn-Schmied Arch Pharmacol 325(suppl): R17.

Laib RJ, Doeijer G, Bolt HM. 1985. Detection of N2. N-3-ethenoguanine in
liver-DMA hydro lysates of young rats and after exposure of the animals
to (14C) vinyl chloride. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 109(2):A7.

* Lee CC, Bhandari JC. Winston JM, et al. 1977a. Inhalation toxicity
of vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride. Environ Health Perspect
21:25-32.

-------
94   Seccion 10

Lee FI, Harry DS, Adams VG, Lltchfield M.  1977b.  Screening for liver
disease in vinyl chloride workers.  Br J Ind Med 34:142-147.

Lee CC, Bhandari JC, Winston JM,  House WB,  Dixon RL,  Woods JS. 1978.
Carcinogenicity of vinyl chloride and vinylidene chloride. J Toxicol
Environ Health 4:15-30.

Lester D, Greenberg LA, Adams WR. 1963. Effects of single and repeated
exposures of humans and rats to vinyl chloride. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J
24:265-275.

Lilis R, Anderson H, Nicholson WJ,  Daum S,  Fischbein AS,  Selikoff IJ.
1975. Prevalence of disease among vinyl chloride and polyvinyl chloride
workers. Ann NY Acad Sci 246:22-41.

Loprieno N, Barale R, Baroncelli S, et al.  1977. Induction of gene
mutations and gene conversions by vinyl chloride metabolites in yeast.
Cancer Res 46:253-257.

Lyman WJ, Reehl WF, Rosenblatt DH.  1982. Handbook of Chemical Property
Estimation Methods. Environmental Behavior of Organic Compounds. HcGraw
Hill Book Co., New York, N.Y., pp.  4-9.

Makarov IA. 1984. Sexual disorders in male workers occupationally
exposed to methyl-methacrylate vinyl chloride. (Trans: 1-11) Gig Tr Prof
Zabol 6:19-23.

Makarov IA, Solovyeva MS,  Gnelitsky GI. 1984. On sexual disorders in
women chronically exposed  to methylmethacrylate and vinyl chloride. Gig
Tr Prof Zabol 3:22-27  (Trans.)

Maltoni C, Lefemine G.  1975. Carcinogenicity bioassays of vinyl
chloride. Current results. Ann NY Acad Sci 246:195-218.

Maltoni C. 1977. Recent findings on the Carcinogenicity of  chlorinated
olefins. Environ Health Perspect 21:15.

* Maltoni C, Lefemine  G. Clliberti A.  et al.  1980. Vinyl  chloride
Carcinogenicity  bioassays  (BT project) as an  experimental model  for risk
identification and  assessment in environmental and occupational
carcinogenesis.  Epidemiol  Anim Epidemiol Hum:  Cas Chlorure  Vinyle
Monomere  (Reun Club Cancerog Chim), 20th, Meeting Date 1979,  pp.  11-112.
Publ Essent, Paris, France.

* Maltoni C, Lefemine  G. Ciliberti A,  et al.  1981. Carcinogenicity
bioassays of vinyl  chloride monomer:  A model  of risk assessment on an
experimental basis.  Environ Health Perspect 41:329.

Maltoni G, Cotti, Valgimigli  L,  Mandrioli A.  1983. Suitable models for
long-term bioassays of the therapeutic and  toxic effects of antiblastic
drugs: Liver angiosarcomas produced  in Sprague-Dawley rats by vinyl
chloride. Dev Oncol 15:339-341.

-------
                                                         References   95

Markovitz SS, McDonald CJ, Fethiere U, Kerzner MS. 1972. Occupational
acroosteolysis. Arch Dera 106:219-223.

Marsteller HJ, Lelbach WK, Muller R, Gedigk P. 1975. Unusual
splenomegalic liver -disease as evidenced by peritoneoscopy and guided
liver biopsy among polyvinyl chloride production workers. Ann NY Acad
Sci 95-134.

Mastromatteo E, Fisher AM, Christie H, Danziger H. 1960. Acute
inhalation toxicity of vinyl chloride to laboratory animals. Am Ind Hyg
Assoc J, pp. 394-398.

MCA (Manufacturing Chemists Association). 1980. Letter regarding the
study and report of effects of vinyl chloride. FYI-OTS-0480-0065 (cited
in EPA 1985b).

McCann J, Simmon V, Streitvieser D, Ames BN. 1975. Mutagenicity of
chloroacetaldehyde, a possible metabolic product of 1,2-dichloroethane
(ethylene dichloride),  chloroethanol (ethylene chlorohydrin),  vinyl
chloride and cyclophosphamide. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 72(8):3190-3193.

McMurry JR, Tarr J. 1978. Vinyl chloride in Texas' ambient air. Proc Ann
Tech Meet - Inst Environ Sci, pp. 149-155.

Micu D, Mihailescu E, Vilau C,- Tarpa A, Chlrcu V, Zgoanta C. 1985.
The value of some cytoenzymochemical investigations of the leukocytes
and platelets in estimating the effects of occupational exposure to
benzene, vinyl chloride, and carbon disulphide. Rev Roum Med-Med Int
23(2):115-120.

Miller JJ, Beizer MB. 1985. Air quality in residences adjacent to an
active hazardous waste disposal site. APCA Annual Meeting, June 16-21,
pp. 2-17.

Mirkova E, Mihailova A, Nosko M. 1978. Embryotoxic and teratogenic
effects in vinyl chloride. (Trans: 1-6) Khig Zdraveopaz 21(5):440-443.
(In Bulgarian: English translation).

Monson RR, Peters JM, Johnson MN. 1975. Proportional mortality among
vinyl chloride workers. Environ Health Perspect 11:75-77.

Muller G, Norpoth K, Vickrama-Singhe RH. 1979. An analytical method
using GC-MS for the quantitative determination of urinary thiodiglycolic
acid. Inc Arch Occup Environ Health 44:185-191.

Nicholson WJ, Hammond EC, Seidman H, Selikoff IJ. 1975. Mortality
experience of a cohort of vinyl chloride-polyvinyl chloride workers. Ann
NY Acad Sci 246:225-230.

NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). 1975.
Recommended Standard...Occupational Exposure to Vinyl Chloride. NTIS
PB-246-691 (cited in EPA 1985b).

-------
96   Section 10

NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health).  1984.
NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods.  3rd ed.  Vol.  2.  Vinyl chloride in
air. Method No. 1007, Washington,  D.C.:  U.S.  Government Printing Office,
pp. 1007-1 to 1007-4.  .

NTIS (National Technical Information Service).  1987. Federal Research in
Progress. Online: September 28, 1987.

OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration). 1983.  OSHA Safety
and Health Standards. 29 CFR 1910.1017,  pp.  670-671.

Oster RH, Carr CJ, Krantz JC. 1947.  Anesthesia XXVII. Narcosis  with
vinyl chloride. Anesthesiology 8:359-361.

Osterman-Golkar S, Jultmark D, Segerback D,  et al.  1977.  Alkylation of
DNA and proteins in mice exposed to vinyl chloride.  Biochem Biophys Res
Comm 76:259-266.

Page GW. 1981. Comparison of groundwater and surface water for  patterns
and levels of contamination by toxic substances.  Environ Sci Technol
15:1475-1481.

Patty FA, Yapt UP, Uaite CP. 1930. Acute response of guinea pigs to
vapors of some new commercial organic compounds.  V.  Vinyl chloride.
Publei Health Rep 45:1963-1971.

Pellizzari ED. Erickson MD, Zweidinger RA. 1979.  Formulation of
preliminary assessment of halogenated organic compounds in man and
environmental media. Research Triangle Park, NC:  Environmental
Protection Agency. EPA/560/13-79-006.

Perticoni GF, Abbritti G, Cantisani TA, Bond L, Mauro L.  1986.
Polineuropathy in workers with long exposure to vinyl chloride.
Electro-physiological study. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 26(l):41-47.

Poncelet F, de Meester C, Duverger-van Bogaert M, et al.  1980.  Influence
of experimental factors on the mutagenicity of vinylic monomers. Arch
Toxicol Suppl 4:63-66.

Popper H, Thomas LB. 1975. Alterations of liver and  spleen among workers
exposed to vinyl chloride. Ann NY Acad Sci 246: 172-194.

Preston BJ, Jones KL, Grainger RG. 1976. Clinical aspects of vinyl
chloride disease. Proc Soc Med 69:284-306.

Purchase IFH, Richardson CR, Anderson D. 1975. Chromosomal and dominant
lethal effects of vinyl chloride. Lancet 410-411.

Purchase IF, Richardson CR, Anderson D, et al. 1978. Chromosomal
analysis in vinyl chloride exposed workers. Mutat Res  57:325-334  (cited
in Anderson et al. 1980).

-------
                                                         JZe/erences   97

 Radike  117,  Varkany J,  Steamer K, et al.  1988.  Perinatal  carcinogen*sis
 induced by  inhaled vinyl chloride. Toxicologiat  8(1):166.

 Raasey  JD,  Flanagan RJ. 1982. Detection  and  identification of volatile
 organic compounds  in blood by headapace  gas  chromatography as an aid to
 the  diagnosis  of solvent use. J Chromatogr 240:423-444.

 Rannug  U, Johansson A, Raael C, Vaehtaeister CA.  1974. The autagenicity
 of vinyl chloride  after metabolic activation.  Aablo  3:194-197

 Rannug  U, Gothe  R, Vachtaeiater CA. 1976. The  autagenicity of
 chloroethylene oxide,  chloroacetaldehyde, 2-chloroethanol and
 chloroacetic acid, conceivable aetabolitea of  vinyl  chloride. Chea Biol
 Interact 12:251-263.

 Rasaussen RA,  Harsch DE, Sweeny PH, Krasnec  JP,  Cronn DR. 1977.
 Determination  of atmospheric halocarbons by  a  teaperature-progrearned gas
 chroaatographic  freeze-out concentration aethod.  J Air Pollut Control
 Assoc 27:579-581.

 Reding  R. 1987.  Chroaatographic aonitorlng aethods for organic
 contaminants under the Safe Drinking Vater Act.  J Chromatogr Scl
 25:338-344.

 Reynolds ES, Moslen MT. Szabo S. et al. 1975.  Hepatotoxicity of vinyl
 chloride and 1,1-dichloroethylene. Aa J Pathol 81:219-231.

 Sabadie N. Malaveille C. Camus AM, Bartsch H.  1980.  Coaparison of the
 hydroxylation  of benzo(a)pyrene with the aetabollsa  of vinyl chloride.
 n-nitrosonorpholine, and n-nitroso-n'aethylpiperazine to autagens by
 human and rat  liver microsomal fractions. Cancer Res 409(1):119-126.

 Sabljic A. 1984. Prediction of the nature and  strength of soil sorption
 of organic pollutants by molecular topology. J Agric Food Chea 32:243-
 246.

 Sakabe  H. 1975.  Bone lesions aaong polyvinyl chloride production workers
 in Japan. Ann NY Acad Sci 246:78.

 Sal'nikova LS, Kltsovskaya IA.  1980.  Effect  of vinyl chloride on
 eabryogenesis of rats. (Trans:  1-7) Gig Tr Prof  Zabol (3):46-47.

 Salkind AJ,  Pearlaan E. 1978. Batteries, secondary (alkaline cells). In
 Kirk-Othaer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology.  Vol. 3. New York, N.Y.:
John Wiley & Sons,  p.  605.

 SANSS (Structure and Noaenclature Search Systea). 1987. Cheaical
 Information Systems.  Online:  Septeaber 1987.

Sax NI,  Ed.  1984. Dangerous Properties of Industrial Materials. 6th ed.
New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.,  p. 2728.

-------
98   Section 10

Sax NI, Lewis RJ, eds. 1987. Hawley's Condensed Chemical Dictionary.
llth ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co.,  p.  1223.

Shahin MM. 1976. The nonmutagenicity and recombinogenieity of vinyl
chloride in the absence of metabolic activation.  Mutat  Res 40:269-272.

Shu P, et al. 1986. Study on excretine regularity of thiodiglycolic acid
in urine of vinyl chloride-exposed workers.  Chin J Prev Med 20(2):87-89.

Simmon VF, Kauhanen K, Tardiff RG. 1977. Mutagenic activity of chemicals
identified in drinking water. Proc Second Int  Conf Environ Mutagens,
Edinburgh, July 11-15, 1977. Progress in Genetic Toxicology.
Elsevier/North Holland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam,  pp. 249-258.

Singley JE. 1984. Water (Municipal Treatment).  In Kirk-Othmer
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology Vol. 24:387.

Sittig M. 1985. Handbook of Toxic and Hazardous Chemicals and
Carcinogens. 2nd ed. Park Ridge, N.J.: Noyes Publications, pp. 918-921.

Smith LR, Dragun J. 1984. Degradation of volatile chlorinated aliphatic
priority pollutants in groundwater. Environ Int 10(4):291-298.

SRI. 1988. 1988 Directory of Chemical Producers. SRI International,
Menlo Park, Calif., p. 1049.

Stallones RA. 1987. The use and abuse of subgroup analysis in
epidemiological research. Prev Med 16:183-194.

Stephens RD, Ball NB. Mar DM. 1986. A multimedia study of hazardous
waste landfill gas migration. In Pollutants in a Multimedia Environment.
Y Cohen, ed. New York. N.Y.: Plenum Press, pp. 265-287.

Stuart JD. 1983. Organics transported thru selected geological media:
Assessment of organics transported away from industrial waste disposal
sites. Comm Univ Storrs Inst of Water Resources. NTIS  PB83-224246, pp.
1-10.

Styles JA. 1977. A method for detecting carcinogenic organic chemicals
using mammalian cells in culture. Br J Cancer 36(5):558-563 (cited in
EPA 198ba).

Suzuki Y. 1978. Pulmonary tumors induced in mice by vinyl chloride
monomer. Environ Res  16:285-301.

Suzuki Y. 1981. Neoplastic and nonneoplastic effects of vinyl chloride
in mouse lung. Environ Health Perspect 41:31-52.

Suzuki Y. 1983. Nonneoplastic effect of vinyl chloride in mouse  lung--
lower doses and short-ten exposure. Environ Res  32:91-103.

-------
                                                         References   99

Tabershav IR, Gaffey WR. 1974. Mortality study of workers in the
manufacture of vinyl chloride and its polymers. J Occup Med
16(8):509-518.

Taaburro CH. 1984. Relationship of vinyl monomers and liver cancers:
angiosarcoma and hepatocellular carcinoma.  Semin Liver Dis, Hay 1984.
4(2):158-169.

Tamburro CH, Makk L, Popper H. 1984.  Early hepatic histologic
alterations among chemical (vinyl monomer)  workers. Hepatology
4:413-418.

Tarkowski S. 1984. Preventive measure against occupational hazards in
the PVC production industry. Prog Clin Biol Res 141:177-189.

Theriault G, Iturra H, Gingras S. 1983. Evaluation of the association
between birth defects and exposure to ambient vinyl chloride. Teratology
27:359-370.

The Vinyl Institute. 1987. Potential effects of vinyl chloride on human
offspring. Unpublished study. Medical Subcommittee of the Technical
Committee. Wayne. N.J.

* Til HP, Immel HR. Feron VJ. 1983. Lifespan oral carcinogenicity study
of vinyl chloride in rats. Final report. Civo Institutes, TNO. Report
No. V 93.285/291099 (cited in EPA 1985a. 1987a).

Torkelson TR, Oygen F, Rove VK. 1961. The toxicity of vinyl chloride as
determined by repeated exposure of laboratory animals. Am Ind Hyg Assoc
J 22:354-361.

Umana M, Warner M, Sheldon LS. 1985.  Methods for sampling and analysis
of breath. EPA/600/8-85/019 and NTIS PB85-243277.

Ungvary G, Hudak A. Tatrai E. Lorincz M. Folly G. 1978. Effects of vinyl
chloride exposure alone and in combination with trypan blue applied
systematically during all thirds of pregnancy on the fetuses of CFY
rats. Toxicology ll(l):45-54.
                                                     ^
USITC (United States International Trade Commission). 1987. Synthetic
Organic Chemicals: United States Production and Sales, 1986. USITC
Publication 2009.  Washington, D.C.,  p. 212.

Vaino H. 1978. Vinyl chloride and vinyl benzene (styrene)  - Metabolism,
mutagenicity, and carcinogenicity. Chem Biol Interact 22:117-124.

van Sittert NJ, de Jong G. 1985. Biomonitoring of exposure  to potential
mutagens and carcinogens in industrial populations. Food Chem Toxic
23(1):23-31.

Verburgt FG, Vogel E. 1977. Vinyl chloride mutagenesis in  Drosophila
oelanogaseer. Mutat Res 48:327-336.

-------
100   Section 10

Verschueren K. 1983. Handbook of Environmental Data on Organic
Chemicals, 2nd ed. New York, N.Y.:  Van Nostrand Reinhold Company,
pp. 1185-1186.

View data base. 1989. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
(ATSDR). Atlanta, Ga.: Office of External Affairs, Exposure and Disease
Registry Branch, February 1989.

Viola PL, Bigotti A, Caputo A. 1971. Oncogenic response of rat skin,
lungs,  and bones to vinyl chloride. Cancer Res 31:516-522 (cited in EPA
1985b).

Uakeham IB, Johnson HR. 1978. Vinyl chloride formation from the thermal
degradation of poly(vinyl chloride). Polymer Eng Sci 18(5):404-407.

Wallace LA, Pellizzari E, Hartwell T, et al. 1984. Personal exposure to
volatile organic compounds. Environ Res 35:293-319.

Walles  AA, Holmberg B. 1984. Induction of single-strand breaks in DNA of
mice after inhalation of vinyl chloride. Cancer Lett 25:13-18.

Wang T, Lenahan R, Kanik M. 1985. Impact of trichloroethylene-
contaminated  groundwater discharged to the main canal and Indian River
Lagoon, Vero  Beach. Florida. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 34:578-586.

Ward AM, Undoon S, Watkins J, Walker AE, Drake CS. 1976. Evidence of an
immune  complex disorder in vinyl chloride workers. Proc R Soc Med
69:289-290.

Watanabe PG,  Gehring PJ. 1976. Dose-dependent fate of vinyl chloride and
its possible  relationship to oncogenicity in rats. Environ Health
Perspect 17:145-152.

Watanabe PG,  McGowan GR. Gehring PJ. 1976a. Fate of  [14C] vinyl chloride
after single  oral administration. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 36(2):339-352.

Watanabe PG,  McCowan GR, Madrid EO, Gehring PJ. 1976b. Fate of [14C]
vinyl chloride following inhalation exposure in rats. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol  37:49-59.

Watanabe PG,  Zeapel JA, Pegg DG, Gehring PJ. 1978a.  Hepatic
macromolecular binding  following exposure to vinyl chloride. Toxicol
Appl  Pharmacol 44(3):571-579.

Watanabe PG,  Zempel JA, Gebring  PJ. 1978b.  Comparison of  the  fate  of
vinyl chloride  following single  and repeated exposure in  rats. Toxic
Appl  Pharmacol 44:391-399.

Waxweiler  RJ, Stringer  V, Wagner JK, Jones  J.  Falk H, Carter  C. 1976.
Neoplastic risk  among workers  exposed  to vinyl chloride.  Ann NY Acad  Sci
271:40-48.

-------
                                                        References   101

Waxweller RJ, Falk H, McMichael A, Mallov JS. Grlvas AS. 1977. A cross -
sectional epidemiologic survey of vinyl chloride workers. NTIS PB274193.

Westrick JJ, Hello JV, Thomas RF. 1984. The groundwater supply survey. J
An Water Works Assoc 76:52-59.

Wilson JT, Wilson BH. 1985. Biotransformation of trichloroethylene in
soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:242-243.

Wilson RH, McCormick WE, Tatum CF, Creech JL. 1967. Occupational acro-
osteolysis report of 31 cases. JAMA 201:577-580.

Withey JR. 1976. Pharmacodynanics and uptake of vinyl chloride monomer
administered by various routes to rats. J Toxicol Environ Health
1:381-394.

Wong 0, Whorton HD, Ragland D. et al. 1986. An update of an
epidemiologic study of vinyl chloride workers. Prepared by Environmental
Health Associates, Inc. or Chemical Manufacturers Association.

Young P, Parker A. 1984. Vapors and odors and toxic gases from
landfills. In Hazardous and Industrial Waste Management and Testing:
Third Symposium. ASTM STP 851. LP Jackson, AR Rohlik, PA Conway, eds.
American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, Pa.,
pp.  24-41.

Zuccato E, Mancucci F, Fanelli R and Mussini E. 1979. Head-space gas-
chromatographic analysis of vinyl chloride monomer in rat blood and
tissues. Xenobiotica 9:27-31.

-------
                                                                     103
                             11.   GLOSSARY

Acute Exposure--Exposure to a chemical for a duration of 14 days or
less, as specified in the Toxicological Profiles.

Bioconcentration Factor (BCF)--The quotient of the concentration of a
chemical in aquatic organisms at a specific time or during a discrete
time period of exposure divided by the concentration in the surrounding
water at the same time or during the same time period.

Carcinogen--A chemical capable of inducing cancer.

Ceiling value (CL)--A concentration of a substance that should not be
exceeded, even instantaneously.

Chronic Exposure--Exposure to a chemical for 365 days or more, as
specified in the Toxicological Profiles.

Developmental Toxicity--The occurrence of adverse effects on the
developing organism that may result from exposure to a chemical prior to
conception (either parent), during prenatal development, or postnatally
to the time of sexual maturation. Adverse developmental effects may be
detected at any point in the life span of the organism.

Embryotoxicity and Fetotoxicity--Any toxic effect on the conceptus as a
result of prenatal exposure to a chemical; the distinguishing feature
between the two terms is the stage of development during which the
insult occurred. The terms, as used here, include malformations and
variations, altered growth, and in utero death.

Frank Effect Level (FEL)--That level of exposure which produces a
statistically or biologically significant increase in frequency or
severity of unmistakable adverse effects, such as irreversible
functional impairment or mortality, in an exposed population when
compared with its appropriate control.

EPA Health Advisory--An estimate of acceptable drinking water levels for
a chemical substance based on health effects information. A health
advisory is not a legally enforceable federal standard, but serves as
technical guidance to assist federal, state, and local officials.

Immediately Dangerous to Life or Health (IDLE)--The maximum
environmental concentration of a contaminant from which one could escape
within 30 min without any escape-Impair ing symptoms or irreversible
health effects.

-------
104   Section 11

Intermediate Exposure--Exposure to a chemical for a duration of 15-364
days, as specified in the Toxicological Profiles.

Immunologic Toxicity--The occurrence of adverse effects on the immune
system that may result from exposure to environmental agents such as
chemicals.

In vitro--Isolated from the living organism and artificially maintained,
as in a test tube.

In vivo--Occurring within the living organism.

Key Study--An animal or human toxicological study that best illustrates
the nature of the adverse effects produced and the doses associated with
those effects.

Lethal Concentration(LO) (LCLo)--The lowest concentration of a chemical
in air which has been reported to have caused death in humans or
animals.

Lethal Concentretion(50) (LCso)--A calculated concentration of a
chemical in air to which exposure for a specific length of time is
expected to cause death in 50% of a defined experimental animal
population.

Lethal Dose(LO) (LDLO)--The lowest dose of a chemical introduced by a
route other than inhalation that is expected to have caused death in
humans or animals.

Lethal Dose<50) (LDsO)--The dose of a chemical which has been calculated
to cause death in 50% of a defined experimental animal population.

Lowest-Observed-Advene-Effect Level (LOAEL)--The lowest dose of
chemical in a study or group of studies which produces statistically or
biologically significant increases in frequency or severity of adverse
effects between the exposed population and its appropriate control.

Lowest-Observed-Effect Level (LOEL)--The lowest dose of chemical in a
study or group of studies which produces statistically or biologically
significant increases in frequency or severity of effects between the
exposed population and its appropriate control.

Malformations--Permanent structural changes that may adversely affect
survival, development, or function.

Minimal Risk Level--An estimate of daily human exposure to a chemical
that is likely to be without an appreciable risk of deleterious effects
(noncancerous) over a specified duration of exposure.

Mutagen--A substance that causes mutations. A mutation is a change in
the genetic material in a body cell. Mutations can lead to birth
defects, miscarriages, or cancer.

-------
                                                            Glossary    105

  H«urotoxiclty--The  occurrence  of adverse effects  on the  nervous  system
  following exposure  to  a  chemical.

  No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level (NOAEL)--That dose of chemical  at which
  there  are no  statistically or  biologically significant increases in
  frequency or  severity  of adverse effects  seen between the  exposed
  population and  its  appropriate control.  Effects may be produced  at this
  dose,  but they  are  not considered to be  adverse.

  No-Observed-Effect  Level (NOEL)--That dose of chemical at which  there
  are no statistically or biologically significant  increases in frequency
  or severity of  effects seen between the exposed population and its
  appropriate control.

  Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL)--An allowable exposure level in
 workplace air averaged over an 8-h shift.

 q^-The upper-bound estimate of the low-dose slope of the dose-response
 curve as determined by the multistage procedure.  The q * can be used to
 calculate an estimate of carcinogenic potency,  the incremental excess
 cancer risk per unit of exposure (usually Mg/L for water, me/kg/day  for
 food,  and pg/tr* for air).

 Reference Dose (RfD)--An estimate (with uncertainty spanning perhaps an
 order of magnitude)  of the daily exposure of the  human population to a
 potential hazard that is  likely to be without risk of deleterious
 effects during a lifetime.  The  RfD is operationally derived from the
 NOAEL (from animal and human  studies)  by a consistent application of
 uncertainty factors  that  reflect  various types  of data used to estimate
 RfDs  and an additional  modifying  factor,  which  is  based on a
 professional Judgment of  the  entire  database  on the chemical.  The RfDs
 are not applicable to nonthreshold effects such as cancer.

 Reportable Quantity  (RQ)--The quantity of a hazardous substance  that  is
 considered reportable under CERCLA.  Reportable  quantities are:  (1) 1  lb
 or greater or  (2)  for selected  substances, an amount established  by
 regulation either  under CERCLA  or under  Sect. 311  of the  Clean Water
 Act. Quantities  are  measured  over a  24-h  period.

 Reproductive Toxicity--The occurrence of  adverse effects  on the
 reproductive system  that may  result  from  exposure  to a chemical.  The
 toxicity may be  directed  to the reproductive  organs  and/or  the related
 endocrine  system.  The manifestation of such toxicity may  be noted as
 alterations In sexual behavior, fertility, pregnancy outcomes, or
 modifications  in other  functions  that are dependent  on the  integrity of
 this system.                                                   e   J

 Short-Tern Exposure Limit (STEL)--The maximum concentration to which
workers can be exposed for up to  15 mln continually.  No more than four
excursions are allowed per day, and there must be  at least 60 min
between exposure periods. The daily TLV-TWA may not  be exceeded

-------
106   Section 11

Target Organ Toxlcity--This term covers a broad range of adverse effects
on target organs or physiological systems (e.g., renal, cardiovascular)
extending from those arising through a single limited exposure to those
assumed over a lifetime-of exposure to a chemical.

Teratogen--A chemical that causes structural defects that affect the
development of an organism.

Threshold Limit Value (TLV)--A concentration of a substance to which
most workers can be exposed without adverse effect. The TLV may be
expressed as a TWA, as a STEL, or as a CL.

Time-weighted Average (TVA)--An allowable exposure concentration
averaged over a normal 8-h workday or 40-h workweek.

Uncertainty Factor (UF)--A factor used in operationally deriving the RfD
from experimental data. UFs are intended to account for (1) the
variation in sensitivity among the members of the human population,
(2) the uncertainty in extrapolating animal data to the case of humans,
(3) the uncertainty in extrapolating from data obtained in a study that
is of less than lifetime exposure, and (4) the uncertainty in using
LOAEL data rather than NOAEL data. Usually each of these factors is set
equal to 10.

-------
                                                                     107
                         APPENDIX:   PEER REVIEW

     A peer review panel was assembled for vinyl chloride.  The panel
consisted of the following members:  Dr.  Richard Monson, Harvard
University, and Dr. Anthony Guarino, South Alabama University. These
experts collectively have knowledge  of vinyl chloride's physical and
chemical properties, toxicokinetics, key health end points, mechanisms
of action, human and animal exposure, and quantification of risk to
humans. All reviewers were selected in conformity with the conditions
for peer review specified in the Superfund Amendments and
Reauthorization Act of 1986, Section 110.
     A joint panel of scientists from ATSDR and EPA has reviewed the
peer reviewers' comments and determined which comments will be included
in the profile. A listing of the peer reviewers' comments not
incorporated in the profile, with a brief explanation of the rationale
for their exclusion, exists as part of the administrative record for
this compound. A list of databases reviewed and a list of unpublished
documents cited are also included in the administrative record.
     The citation of the peer review panel should not be understood to
imply their approval of the profile's final content. The responsibility
for the content of this profile lies with the Agency for Toxic
Substances and Disease Registry.

-------