Sound Estuary Program
HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF
CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION
IN PUGET SOUND SEAFOOD
TC-3338-28
FINAL REPORT
September 1988
Prepared by
Tetra Tech, Inc.
Prepared for
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region X - Office of Puget Sound
Seattle, Washington
-------
Pugetjfpund Estuary Program
HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF
CHEMICAL CONTAMINATION
IN PUGET SOUND SEAFOOD
TC-3338-28
FINAL REPORT
September 1988
Prepared by
Tetra Tech, Inc.
Prepared for
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region X - Office of Puget Sound
Seattle, Washington
-------
TC-3338-28
Final Report
HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT OF CHEMICAL
CONTAMINANTS IN PUGET SOUND SEAFOOD
by
Tetra Tech, Inc.
for
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region X - Office of Puget Sound
Seattle, Washington
September 1988
Tetra Tech, Inc.
11820 Northup Way, Suite 100
Bellevue, Washington 98005
-------
CONTENTS
Page
LIST OF FIGURES iv
LIST OF TABLES vi
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS viii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ix
INTRODUCTION 1
OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS 4
OVERVIEW OF RISK ASSESSMENT 4
Hazard Identification 7
Dose Response Assessment 9
Exposure Assessment H
Risk Characterization 13
Uncertainty Analysis 15
SUMMARY OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR PUGET SOUND SEAFOOD 18
COMPILATION AND REVIEW OF PUGET SOUND DATA 20
SOURCES OF DATA 20
DATA QUALITY 22
SELECTION OF CANDIDATE CHEMICALS OF CONCERN 23
RISK ASSESSMENT 27
HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION OF CHEMICALS OF CONCERN 27
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT 37
EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT 40
Concentrations of Chemicals of Concern 40
Seafood Consumption Rates 51
Dose-Estimation 59
n
-------
RISK CHARACTERIZATION 60
Risk Characterization Methods and Assumptions 61
Characterization of Risks 63
COMPARISONS OF CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS WITH LOCATIONS OUTSIDE
OF PUGET SOUND 73
GRAPHICAL RISK CHARACTERIZATION 81
CONCLUSIONS 95
REFERENCES 97
iii
-------
FIGURES
Number Page
1 Overview of the risk assessment process 5
2 Hypothetical dose-response relationships for a carcinogen, and
a noncarcinogen 10
3 Sampling areas for risk assessment of chemically contaminated
seafood 28
4 Estimates of fish consumption rates as a function of cumulative
percent of the angler population for shore and boat anglers
surveyed by the Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department (a), and
for boat anglers surveyed by NOAA(b) 54
5 Estimates of fish consumption rates as a function of cumulative
percent of the angler population for shore anglers surveyed by
the Washington Department of Social and Health Services (a), the
Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department (b), and NOAA (c) 55
6 Range of average PCB concentrations for fishes sampled from
three or more locations in Puget Sound 71
7 Comparison of the ranges of risk estimates for carcinogenic
chemicals of concern in Puget Sound fish and shellfish with
those in fish and shellfish from locations outside of Puget
Sound 79
8 Graphical risk characterization for arsenic in seafood 82
9 Graphical risk characterization for carcinogenic PAH in seafood 83
10 Graphical risk characterization for PCBs in seafood 84
11 Graphical risk characterization for alpha-HCH in seafood 85
12 Graphical risk characterization for DDT, ODD, and DDE in
seafood 86
13 Graphical risk characterization for cadmium in seafood 87
14 Graphical risk characterization for lead in seafood 88
15 Graphical risk characterization for mercury in seafood 89
-------
16 Consumption rate as a function of the number of servings per
year of fish and shellfish, kelp, ulva, and nori 94
-------
TABLES
dumber Page
1 Chemicals of potential concern in Puget Sound seafood 26
2 Scientific and common names of fish, shellfish, and macro-
algae evaluated in risk assessment of chemically contaminated
seafood 29
3 Preliminary risk estimates for chemicals of concern in fish,
shellfish, and macroalgae 31
4 Categories of candidate chemicals or compound groups based on
preliminary risk estimates 33
5 Toxicity profiles of chemicals of concern 35
6 Dose-response information for chemicals detected in fish,
shellfish, and macroalgae 38
7 Total number of qualified data values for chemicals of concern
in various categories of seafood collected in Puget Sound 41
8 Number of unqualified data values for chemicals of concern in
various seafood categories from locations throughout Puget
Sound 45
9 Summary data for chemicals of concern in Puget Sound fish,
shellfish, and macroalgae 48
10 Estimated fish consumption rates (g/day) for various
proportions of urban angler populations surveyed in Puget Sound 56
11 Summary of assumptions, numerical estimates, and calculations
used for characterization of health risks associated with
chemical contaminants in Puget Sound seafood 64
12 Noncarcinogenic risk characterization for chemicals of concern
in Puget Sound seafood 66
13 Carcinogenic risk characterization for chemicals of concern
in Puget Sound seafood 67
14 Comparisons of concentrations (ug/kg, wet weight) of carcinogens
of concern in fish and shellfish from Puget Sound with those
from locations outside of Puget Sound 76
VI
-------
15 Risk comparisons with locations outside of Puget Sound based on
average contaminant concentrations in fish and shellfish 78
16 Examples of cancer risks from common carcinogens 90
17 Summary of consumption patterns 93
vn
-------
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This document was prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc., for the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) in partial fulfillment of Contract No. 68-02-4331.
Ms. Sally Hanft of U.S. EPA was the Project Officer and Ms. Catherine
Krueger of U.S. EPA was the Project Monitor. Dr. Donald Wilson of Tetra Tech
was the Program Manager.
The primary author of this report was Dr. Leslie Williams. Dr. Gary
Pascoe, Dr. Jean Jacoby, Ms. Nancy Musgrove, and Ms. Lynne Kilpatrick-Howard
of Tetra Tech, Inc., provided technical assistance. Valuable comments on
the preliminary stages of risk analysis and on the draft report from which
this report was developed were provided by Ms. Catherine Krueger and Dr.
John Armstrong of U.S. EPA. Additional valuable comments and discussion
were provided by work group participants from local, state, and federal
agencies, universities, and consulting organizations. Ms. Marcy Brooks-McAuliffe
and Ms. M. Sue Trevathan assisted in technical editing and report production.
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Potentially toxic chemicals such as PCBs, pesticides, and metals may
accumulate in the edible tissues of fish, shellfish, and macroalgae harvested
from Puget Sound. Concern over the potential health risks associated with
consumption of locally harvested seafood prompted several recent studies of
catch and consumption patterns, and of chemical contaminants in the catch of
recreational harvesters. Other studies have focused on contaminant
concentrations and potential health risks associated with consumption of
Puget Sound biota harvested in the vicinity of hazardous waste sites or
urbanized areas. During 1986-1987, a broad-scale survey of the extent of
chemical contamination in Puget Sound seafood was sponsored by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region X. Support for this
effort was provided by the Washington Department of Fisheries (WDF), the
Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology), and the Washington Department of
Social and Health Services (DSHS). These survey data and other data
collected for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Ecology, or
the U.S. EPA Puget Sound Estuary Program were used in this report to
characterize potential human health risks associated with chemical con-
taminants in Puget Sound seafood.
The primary objective of this report is threefold: to provide resource
management and health agencies with a general indication of the magnitude of
potential risks, to indicate whether immediate regulatory action was
warranted to protect public health, and to guide future data collection
efforts. A secondary objective of this report is to provide health agencies
and the public with a tool that could be used to easily estimate potential
health risks associated with chemicals in Puget Sound seafood as additional
data become available in the future.
This report focuses entirely on recreational harvesters of Puget Sound
seafood, who comprise a subset of the general population. For the purpose of
ix
-------
this analysis, recreational harvesters are defined as individuals who
frequently collect fish, shellfish, or edible seaweed for use in personal
consumption. Although not specifically addressed in this report, potential
risks associated with consumption of commercially harvested Puget Sound
seafood should be similar to those associated with consumption of recrea-
tional^ harvested Puget Sound seafood, assuming similar seafood consumption
patterns and seafood contamination levels.
The report is intended to provide the public and regulatory agencies
with a framework characterizing the relative hazards associated with
chemical contaminants in various seafood categories and locations in the
Puget Sound basin. Because of limitations in the available data, the
results of this effort should not be viewed as an indication of absolute
health risks. In general, highly conservative assumptions concerning
chemical toxicity and exposure are used to estimate potential health risks.
Because of the conservative nature of U.S. EPA's risk assessment model,
actual health risks to consumers of Puget Sound seafood associated with the
limited number of chemicals evaluated in this study are likely to be less
than the estimates of potential health risks provided in this report. It is
not known, however, to what extent nonmeasured chemicals contribute to the
overall health risks associated with seafood consumption.
OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS
Risk assessment is a scientific procedure to determine the probability
of adverse health effects from a specific exposure to a toxic agent. The
general format for risk assessment and all definitions of terms used in
this report are consistent with those provided by National Research Council
(1983) and U.S. EPA (1986a,b,c,d). The following sections provide an
overview of the risk assessment process and a summary of how that process
was applied to chemical contaminants in Puget Sound seafood.
-------
Overview of Risk Assessment
As indicated in Figure ES-1, risk assessment is a multistep process
comprising the following tasks:
• Hazard Assessment -- Selection of chemicals of concern and
qualitative evaluation of their potential to cause adverse
health effects (e.g., birth defects, cancer) in animals or in
humans
• Dose-Response Assessment -- Quantitative estimation of the
relationship between the dose of a substance and the
probability of an adverse health effect
• Exposure Assessment -- Characterization of the populations
exposed to the toxic chemicals of concern; the environmental
transport and fate pathways; and the magnitude, frequency,
and duration of exposure
• Risk Assessment -- Estimation of risk for the health effect
of concern, based on information from the dose-response and
exposure assessments
• Uncertainty Analysis -- Qualitative and, where possible,
quantitative description of the assumptions and limitations
inherent in each step of the risk assessment.
Although these steps are presented sequentially, the risk assessment
process is highly iterative. Further elaboration on the uses of risk
assessment and risk management in evaluation of chemically contaminated fish
and shellfish is available in several U.S. EPA guidance manuals (Tetra Tech
1986; PTI 1987).
-------
RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS
DOSE-RESPONSE
ASSESSMENT
HAZARD ASSESSMENT
(Identify Chemicals of Concern)
RISK CHARACTERIZATION
UNCERTAINLY AND
PERSPECTIVE
EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
Figure ES-1. Overview of the risk assessment process.
-------
Summary of the Risk Assessment Process for Puoet Sound Seafood
The risk analysis of chemical contaminants in Puget Sound seafood was
organized into the following major sections:
• Compilation and review of Puget Sound data on chemicals in seafood
• Assessment of human health risks due to consumption of Puget
Sound seafood
• Comparisons of seafood contaminant concentrations and
associated health risks in Puget Sound with those in other
U.S. coastal locations
• Development of a graphical tool for estimating health risks
for a wide range of exposure conditions.
The compilation and review of Puget Sound data involved synthesizing
numerous data sources into a composite data set, and identifying 37 candidate
chemicals for risk analysis. These chemical data were then evaluated in a
health risk assessment that followed the multistep procedure outlined above.
In the hazard assessment, the 37 candidate chemicals were evaluated in a
preliminary risk assessment, and 8 chemicals or compound groups of concern
were selected for detailed evaluation of risks. The dose-response assessment
compiled dose-response variables for the 37 candidate chemicals and
presented toxicity profiles for the subset of eight chemicals of concern
identified in the hazard assessment. The exposure assessment consisted of
an evaluation of the concentrations in biota of the eight chemicals of
concern by seafood category and sampling location within Puget Sound. This
task also included a summary of seafood consumption rates that was based in
part on recent surveys of recreational harvesters in Puget Sound. In the
risk characterization, the dose-response information and consumption rate
information were combined to quantitatively estimate the range of health
risks associated with consumption of seafood contaminated with the eight
xiii
-------
chemicals of concern. Uncertainties, limitations, and assumptions are
discussed qualitatively at each stage of the risk assessment process.
To supplement the risk characterization, contaminant concentrations in
Puget Sound biota were compared with those in biota from other U.S. coastal
areas. A method for graphical characterization of risks for the eight
chemicals of concern was also developed. The purpose of this activity was to
provide regulatory agencies and the public with a generic graphical tool
that could be used to easily estimate potential health risks associated with
a wide range of chemical concentrations and consumption rates for Puget
Sound seafood.
COMPILATION AND REVIEW OF PUGET SOUND DATA
Ten data sets were evaluated for this risk assessment. The studies
that generated these data ranged considerably in their objectives, survey
designs, and sampling and analysis methods. However, each survey charac-
terized chemical contamination in industrialized or urbanized areas of Puget
Sound, and included one or more areas located well away from urban centers
or sources of industrial contaminants. Hence, the Puget Sound seafood risk
assessment was likely based on data that are representative of the various
degrees of chemical contamination observed throughout the sound.
The selection of chemicals for evaluation in the risk assessment was
based on the results of quality assurance (QA) reviews for each of the
studies as well as on other criteria. Identification of candidate chemicals
for the risk assessment was conducted in several steps. An Initial
decision to accept or reject available data was based on whether the seafood
species sampled and the locations at which they were collected were clearly
identified. Further evaluation of samples that passed this initial
selection was based on the frequency of detection and data quality for
individual chemicals. This process resulted in the identification of
37 candidate chemicals or compound groups for further evaluation of health
risks associated with consumption of chemically contaminated seafood.
xiv
-------
RISK ASSESSMENT
The 37 candidate chemicals or compound groups were evaluated according
to the general risk assessment guidelines established by the U.S. EPA
(1986a,b, c,d), as well as guidance developed for the Puget Sound Estuary
Program for risk assessment of chemically contaminated seafood (Tetra
Tech 1986).
Following data compilation, data were available for chemical contami-
nants in fish, shellfish, and macroalgae from 22 locations in Puget Sound
(Figure ES-2). The taxa sampled at one or more of these locations are
listed in Table ES-1. The number of taxa and kinds of algae and animals
sampled varied considerably among areas. For the purposes of the risk
assessment, the various species were pooled into categories that are more
representative of differences in potential ingestion rates and therefore
human contaminant exposure (see Exposure Assessment below). The various
categories were fish, shellfish, kelp and green algae, and red algae of the
genus Porphyra (commonly known as nori).
Hazard Assessment and Selection of Chemicals of Concern
After the initial screening and identification of the 37 chemicals of
potential concern, these chemicals were further characterized and prioritized
by considering the following factors:
• Preliminary worst-case risk evaluation
• The frequency of detection and maximum concentrations in
different categories of biota sampled throughout Puget Sound
• The lexicological characteristics of the various contaminants.
Using a range of reasonable upper-bound assumptions, the objective of the
preliminary risk evaluation was to identify those substances from the
xv
-------
ALKI POINT
AGATE PASS
ANACORTES
BIRCH BAY
SUDD INLET
BURLEY LAGOON
COMMENCEMENT BAY
DASH POINT
EAGLE HARBOR
EDMONDS
ELLIOTT BAY
EVERETT HARBOR
MANCHESTER
MUKILTEO
POINT JEFFERSON
POINT MADISON
POINT NO POINT
POINT PULLEY
PORT SUSAN
QUARTERMASTER HARBOR
ROLLING BAY
SINCLAIR INLET
5 10
Figure ES-2. Sampling areas for risk assessment of chemically
contaminated seafood.
XVI
-------
TABLE ES-1. SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAMES OF FISH, SHELLFISH,
AND MACROALGAE EVALUATED IN RISK ASSESSMENT
OF CHEMICALLY CONTAMINATED SEAFOOD
Category Type
Scientific Name
Common Name
Fish
Pelagic
Bottom feeding
Bottom fish
Shellfish Crab
Bivalve
Squid
Oncorhynchus kisutch
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha
HerTuccius productus
Embiotoca lateral is
Sebastes spp.
Anoplopoma fimbria
Gadus macrocephalus
Jheragra chalcogramma
Microgadus proximus
Parophrys vetulus
Platichthys stellatus
Citharichthys sordidus
Lepidopsetta bill neat a
Hippogloissoides elassodon
Enophrys bison
Cancer magister
Cancer productus
Clinocardium nuttalli
Hacoma inquinata
Hacoma nasuta
Hacoma secta
Hacoma spp.
Hya arenaria
Protothaca staminea
Saxidomus giganteus
Tapes japonica
Tresus capax
Loligo opalescens
Macroalgae Brown algae (kelp) Laminaria spp.
Nereocystis spp.
Coho salmon
Chinook salmon
Pacific hake
Striped perch
Rockfish
Sablefish
Pacific cod
Walleye pollock
Tomcod
English sole
Starry flounder
Pacific sanddab
Rock sole
Flathead sole
Buffalo sculpin
Dungeness crab
Rock crab
Heart cockle
Bent nose clam
Sand clam
Softshell clam
Littleneck clam
Butter clam
Manila clam
Horseneck clam
Market squid
Green algae
Red algae
Ulva spp.
Porphyra spp.
Sea lettuce
Nori
xvii
-------
initial list of 37 chemicals that are truly of concern in Puget Sound
seafood.
Based on the results of the preliminary risk estimates, the various
chemicals were categorized into high-priority, medium-priority, and low-
priority groups (Table ES-2). The chemicals of concern selected for further
risk analysis included all of the high-priority chemicals or compound groups
and one medium-priority chemical (mercury). The carcinogenic chemicals or
compound groups of concern are arsenic, carcinogenic PAH [benzo(a)anthracene,
benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, and chrysene], PCB, alpha-HCH, and
S DDT (i.e., ODD, DDE, and DDT). The noncarcinogenic chemicals of concern
are cadmium, lead, and mercury.
Dose-Response Assessment
In developing risk assessment methods, U.S. EPA recognized that
fundamental differences exist between carcinogenic dose-response variables
and noncarcinogenic dose-response variables that could be used to estimate
risks. Because of these differences, human health risk characterization is
conducted separately for carcinogens and noncarcinogens.
Key dose-response variables used in quantitative risk assessment are
potency factors for carcinogens and reference dose (RfD) values for
noncarcinogens. The carcinogenic potency factor [expressed in units of
(ing/kg/day)"!] is typically determined by the upper 95 percent confidence
limit of slope of the linearized multistage model that expresses excess
cancer risk as function of dose. The RfD (expressed in units of mg/kg/day)
is an estimated single daily chemical intake rate that appears to be without
risk if ingested over a lifetime (Vettorazzi 1976, 1980; U.S. EPA 1980,
1987a; Dourson and Stara 1983).
Available dose-response information for quantitative risk assessment is
summarized in Table ES-3 for the 37 candidate chemicals. These variables
were used for the preliminary risk determination and selection of the eight
chemicals of concern described in the Hazard Assessment. Potency factors
xviii
-------
TABLE ES-2. CATEGORIES OF CANDIDATE CHEMICALS3 OR COMPOUND GROUPS
BASED ON PRELIMINARY RISK ESTIMATES
Priority
Highb
Toxic Class
Carcinogens
Chemical or Compound Group
Arsenic
Mediumd
Low6
Noncarcinogens
Carcinogens
Noncarcinogens
Carcinogens
Noncarcinogens
\* VK I «*tl10'5, and on worst-case noncar-
cinogenic risk index >1.
c Includes benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, and
chrysene.
d Based on worst-case carcinogenic risks that range from 10'6 to 10"5, and on
worst-case noncarcinogenic risk index that ranges from 0.25 to 1.
e Based on worst-case carcinogenic risk <10~6, and on worst-case noncar-
cinogenic risks <0.25.
xix
-------
ES-3. DQ$E-RESPp«SE (NFPRMATJON F*W PHEtMMLIf 0E.TEC1EP IV FISH, SHELLFISH. AND.
Carcinoaens
Chemical Class
Metals
LPAH
HPAH
Chlorinated aliphatic compounds
Chlorinated aromatic compounds
Phthalates
PCBs
Pesticides
Ketones
Unsaturated alcohols
Potency facto/ ~ Weight of
Chemical (mg/kg/day)'1 Evidence*
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium (VI)
Copper
Lead
Mercury (methyl)
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
line
Anthracene
Phenanthrene
Benzo( a ) anth racene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo( b) f I uoranthene
Benzo( k) f I uoranthene
Chrysene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Hexach I orobutadi ene
Hexach loroberuene
B
-------
and weight-of-evidence ratings for carcinogens and reference dose (RfD)
values, and confidence ratings for noncarcinogens were collated from a
variety of sources including the Integrated Risk Information System
database, the Public Health Risk Evaluation Database, health advisory
documents, the Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual, and the drinking
water criteria for PCBs.
Exposure Assessment
The exposure assessment for consumption of chemically contaminated
seafood from Puget Sound was performed in three parts. First, the concentra-
tions of the eight chemicals of concern in Puget Sound biota were summarized
by seafood category and sampling location, and were compared with available
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tolerances or action levels.
Second, seafood consumption rates based in part on recent surveys of
recreational harvesters in Puget Sound were summarized. Finally, chemical
concentration data and consumption rates were combined to estimate the
average daily dose associated with each chemical of concern.
Concentrations of Chemicals of Concern--
Concentration data for the chemicals of concern in various categories
of seafood from all Puget Sound locations [i.e., fish, shellfish (bivalves
and squid only), kelp and Ulva, and nori] are summarized in Table ES-4. The
data summary provided in Table ES-4 is based on only those data that met all
data quality objectives, and on the use of one-half the quantification
limits for those substances that were not detected.
FDA tolerances or action levels exist for three of the eight chemicals
that are of concern in this risk assessment: mercury, PCBs, and 2 DDT.
Overall, average concentrations of these substances in the various species
and categories of seafood were less than the FDA tolerances or action levels
for all locations in Puget Sound. The only notable exception was the
concentration of PCBs [2.06 mg/kg (2,060 ug/kg) wet weight] in a single
sample of English sole from Elliott Bay. The FDA tolerance for PCBs in fish
xx i
-------
TABLE ES-4. SUMMARY DATA* FOR CHEMICALS OF CONCERN IN PU6ET SOUND
FISH. SHELLFISH, AND MACROAL6AE
Chemical
Arseni c
Cadnium
Lead
Mercury
DOT, ODE. ODD
alpha-HCH
Carcinogenic
PAH
PCS
Seafood
Category
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
(tori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nor1
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
No.
Samples
147
110
33
7
142
118
33
7
141
96
33
7
82
93
33
7
205
26
33
7
143
19
33
7
32
5
-
185
41
33
7
Percent
Detected
100
100
100
100
76
100
100
100
50
81
85
57
87
100
48
43
40
69
100
100
3
-
-
47
-
-
99
83
-
—
Concentration
Mean
3.441
3,252
2.559
2.279
5.4
219.1
173.2
213.1
16.3
199.3
338.0
76.8
26.6
22.5
1.7
1.0
11.15
1.60
4.03
3.36
0.60
0.05
0.53
0.50
61.9
261.7
~
138.2
44.7
10.6
10.0
SE
354
254
380
499
0.6
16.2
19.4
48.6
3.0
33.1
135.7
36.8
4.2
1.6
0.5
0.3
2.24
0.49
0.11
0.14
0.09
0.00
0.03
0.00
25.2
62.6
~
17.6
10.2
0.6
0.0
(ug/kg wet wt)b
Minimum
190
1,200
340
470
0.5
2.0
46.0
62.0
0.5
1.0
2.5
2.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.85
0.15
3.00
3.00
0.05
0.05
0.50
0.50
2.5
120.0
~
1.8
1.0
10.0
10.0
Maximum
20.700
22.100
9.200
3.880
66.0
1.280.0
437.0
394.0
200.0
1,980.0
4,460.0
240.0
260.0
103.0
15.0
3.0
415.00
11.33
7.00
4.00
6.00
0.10
1.50
0.50
748.0
480.0
"
2.060.0
230.0
30.0
10.0
95 Percent
Confidence Limits0
Lower Upper
2.740
2,749
1.785
1,057
4.1
187.0
133.7
94.3
10.4
133.5
61.6
0.0
13.3
19.3
0.8
0.2
6.72
0.60
3.80
3.51
0.42
0.05
0.47
0.50
10.6
87.9
103.5
24.0
9.4
10.0
4.141
3,756
3.333
3.500
6.6
251.2
212.6
332.0
22.1
265.1
614.3
166.9
34.9
25.6
2.6
1.8
15.57
2.61
4.26
4.21
0.78
0.06
0.59
0.50
113.2
435.5
172.9
65.5
11.8
10.0
* Only those values that met data quality objectives were used in the data sunary, and in the subsequent
risk characterization. Consequently, the number of samples and suwary statistics indicated herein nay
differ substantially from those based on both qualified and unqualified data, which are sunmarized in
Appendix B.
b One-half the quant i tat ion limits was assumed for values that were not detected.
c The 95 percent confidence interval was determined as follows:
Lower confidence limit (LCL)
- t.
0.05 (n-1)
xSE
Upper confidence limit (UCL) * mean + t0'05 (n_!)xSE
where:
= Student's two-tailed t value for alpha - 0.05 and n-1 degrees of freedom.
t0 Q5 .
SE = The standard error of the mean.
XXI1
-------
and shellfish is 2 mg/kg (2,000 Mg/kg). FDA action levels or tolerances
have not been established for other chemicals of concern in Puget Sound
seafood.
Seafood Consumption Rates--
Concern over the potential health risks associated with consumption of
seafood prompted several recent studies that focused on catch and consumption
patterns for recreational anglers in Puget Sound (Pierce et al. 1981;
McCallum 1985; Landolt et al. 1985, 1987). The results of each of these
studies were summarized and analyzed statistically to derive a number of
independent estimates of seafood consumption rates for the 5th, 50th (i.e.,
median), and 95th percentiles of the angling population. Based on this
analysis, a consumption rate of 12.3 g/day was used to estimate average
exposure, and a consumption rate of 95.1 g/day was used to estimate high
exposure to chemically contaminated fish from Puget Sound.
Consumption rates specific to Puget Sound were not available for
shellfish or for macroalgae. Nash (1971) compiled regional information
indicating that the median shellfish consumption rate for the general
population is 1.1 g/day, which was the value used to estimate average
exposure in Puget Sound. A consumption rate of 21.5 g/day (assuming
151 g/serving x 52 servings/yr) was used to estimate high exposure to
chemically contaminated shellfish from Puget Sound.
Average and high exposure estimates for consumption of macroalgae were
based on marketing information developed by a local mariculture facility
specializing in the production of algae of the genus Porphyra, which is
commonly known as nori. Estimates of average U.S. consumption rates were
used to determine average exposure, and estimates of average consumption
rates in Japan were used to determine high exposure, which may be represen-
tative of ethnic minorities who harvest macroalgae from Puget Sound. For
kelp, the average consumption rate in the U.S. is 0.023 g/day, and that in
Japan is 16.2 g/day. For nori, the average consumption rate in the U.S. is
0.006 g/day, and that in Japan is 4.1 g/day.
xxiii
-------
Dose-Estimation--
All risk estimates are dependent on determination of chemical doses.
Because the consumption rate information described above is based on
averages for all species within a category, dose estimates were only derived
for major categories of seafood (i.e., fish, shellfish, kelp and Ulva, and
nori). The following expression was used for dose estimation:
where:
Dose of chemical i in seafood category j (mg/kg body weight/day)
• Concentration of chemical i in seafood category j (mg/kg seafood)
Ij - Ingestion rate for seafood category j (kg seafood/day)
Ai » Absorption coefficient for chemical i (unitless)
B » Standard assumption for average lifetime body weight (70 kg).
The following major assumptions were used In dose-estimation:
• Exposure occurs daily over a 70-yr lifetime
• A representative body weight for a lifetime of exposure is
70 kg
• The absorption coefficient is 1 percent for ingested arsenic
and 100 percent for the other chemicals.
Approximately 1 percent of the total arsenic in seafood is in the inorganic
form. Because the carcinogenic potency factor for arsenic is based on
ingestion of inorganic arsenic, 1 percent of the total arsenic concentration
was used to estimate risks associated with seafood consumption.
xxiv
-------
Mean chemical concentrations and the average consumption rates
described previously for various categories of seafood were used to estimate
average lifetime doses for the various chemicals of concern. The upper
95 percent confidence limit of mean concentrations in various seafood
categories, and the high-case consumption rates for each category of seafood
were used to estimate high lifetime doses for each chemical of concern.
Thus, dose-estimation was based on a range of values representative of
average exposure conditions and high exposure conditions.
Risk Characterization
Dose-response variables summarized in the Dose-Response Assessment
were used with the dose estimates summarized in the Exposure Assessment to
characterize potential health risks associated with chemically contaminated
seafood from Puget Sound.
Risk Estimation Methods--
Potential risks associated with each carcinogen of concern in various
categories of seafood were estimated as the probability of excess cancer
using the following equation:
Rij = 1 - exp(-P1 x Dij)
where:
Risk associated with chemical i in seafood category j
Carcinogenic potency factor for chemical i (mg/kg/day)'1
DJJ = Dose of chemical i in seafood category j (mg/kg/day).
Attributes of carcinogenic potency factors and methods of dose estimation
are as described above (see Dose Response Assessment and Exposure Assess-
ment).
xxv
-------
Nonprobab 111 stlc hazards associated with Ingest Ion of ncmcarcisnogens In
various seafood categories were expressed as a ratio:
WlJ - °1j/RfD1
where:
RI-jj = Risk Index for chemical 1 In seafood category j
Dose of chemical 1 in seafood category j (mg/kg/day)
Reference dose for chemical i (mg/kg/day).
Characteristics of the RfD and methods of dose estimation are as described
above.
Finally, potential cumulative health risks associated with exposure to
multiple carcinogenic chemicals or multiple noncarcinogenic chemicals In
various categories of seafood were determined by summing the risks for
individual contaminants within a seafood category and then suming the
risks across all seafood categories.
Risk Interpretation—
The cumulative risk estimate for carcinogens provides an indication of
the lifetime probability of excess cancer that may occur through exposure to
one or more substances, each of which may act independently on various
target organs. In general, U.S. EPA decisions concerning individual
lifetime risk estimates In the range of 10~7 to 10"3 are made on a case-by-
case basis and are strongly influenced by considerations of the population
risk (Travis et al. 1987; Travis and Haltemer-Frey 1988). Individual risk
levels greater than 10~3 are usually subject to regulatory action, and those
less than 10'7 are rarely subject to regulatory action. Under Superfund,
U.S. EPA (1986d) has established a target range of 10'7 to 10'4 for remedial
action alternatives that are designed to mitigate exposure to hazardous
substances.
xxvi
-------
The cumulative risk index for noncarcinogens assumes simple additivity
of effects and provides a numerical indication of the nearness to acceptable
limits of exposure or the degree to which acceptable exposure limits are
exceeded (U.S. EPA 1986c). A cumulative risk index greater than 1.0 suggests
that exposure to an individual substance or all substances collectively
exceeds a generalized level of concern for a common toxicological endpoint
or target organ.
Results--
Under the procedure outlined above, chemical doses and dose-response
variables were used to estimate potential health risks for the three
noncarcinogenic and five carcinogenic chemicals of concern.
Risk index values for cumulative exposure to the three noncarcinogenic
chemicals (i.e., cadmium, lead and mercury) via consumption of all categories
of seafood ranged from 0.04 for average exposure conditions to 0.9 for high
exposure conditions. Risk index values for individual noncarcinogens were
typically low and ranged from less than 0.001 for all three substances in
kelp and nori to 0.3 for cadmium in shellfish.
Carcinogenic risks for cumulative exposure to arsenic and the four
organic chemicals of concern ranged from 2xlO'4 for average exposure
conditions to 4xlO'3 for high exposure conditions. These relatively high
cumulative carcinogen risk levels were driven primarily by potential exposure
to PCBs in fish from specific locations in Puget Sound (Commencement Bay,
Elliott Bay, Manchester, and Sinclair Inlet). PCBs in fish from these
areas accounted for most of the risk, although arsenic in fish and PCBs in
squid from Commencement Bay were contributing factors. Potential health
risks, exclusive of the contribution of PCBs, were within the generally
acceptable range of 10'6 to 10'5.
xxv 11
-------
COMPARISONS WITH LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF PUGET SOUND
To place the foregoing health risk assessment into a national perspec-
tive, contaminant concentrations and associated health risks in Puget Sound
biota were compared with those in biota from outside of Puget Sound. The
health risk assessment indicates that risks associated with the noncar-
cinogenic chemicals of concern are within acceptable levels (i.e., <1).
Consequently, comparisons with contaminant concentrations in biota located
outside of Puget Sound were limited to the carcinogenic chemicals of concern
(i.e., arsenic, carcinogenic PAH, PCB, alpha-HCH, and s DDT).
In developing monitoring guidance for contaminant bioaccumulation, the
U.S. EPA sponsored an extensive review of available bioaccumulation data for
a wide number of marine fishes and shellfish from U.S. coastal and terri-
torial waters (Tetra Tech 1987). Although only a selected number of target
species were considered in the bioaccumulation review, it was based on high
quality information that is generally comparable to that used for the risk
assessment of chemically contaminated seafood in Puget Sound (see Compilation
and Review of Puget Sound Data).
Chemical concentration data for carcinogens of concern were available
for fishes and shellfish from coastal and offshore areas ranging from Nova
Scotia to Virginia on the Atlantic coast, and from Washington to Oregon on
the Pacific coast. These data are representative of a range of chemical
concentrations in biota from relatively clean sites (e.g., Bodega Head, CA),
and from areas of known contamination (e.g., Raritan Bay, NY). Data for
carcinogens of concern in macroalgae outside of Puget Sound were not
available for comparison.
To estimate a range of potential health risks associated with carcino-
gens of concern in other regions, the contaminant concentration data for
locations outside of Puget Sound were combined with exposure assumptions
for Puget Sound (see Exposure Assessment) and risk estimates were calculated
as for risks associated with Puget Sound seafood. These risk estimates for
regions outside of Puget Sound were derived for comparative purposes only.
xxvi i i
-------
Risk estimates for other regions may vary from those calculated here because
of regional differences in exposure conditions (e.g., Belton et al. 1986).
Comparisons based on these estimated risk levels are summarized in
Figure ES-3. For shellfish, average-case risk levels were less than or equal
to 10~5 for all substances both within and outside of Puget Sound. However,
high-case risk levels for individual locations exceeded U.S. EPA's regulatory
target range of 10'7 to 10'* for PAH and PCBs both within and outside of
Puget Sound. In general, both average-case and high-case risk estimates for
PCBs, alpha-HCH, and S DDT in shellfish from Puget Sound were either
comparable to or substantially (i.e., 1 order of magnitude) less than those
in shellfish from outside of Puget Sound. Although risk levels associated
with arsenic were within U.S. EPA's regulatory target range, average-case and
high-case values for shellfish in Puget Sound were greater than those for
shellfish from locations from outside of Puget Sound. For PAH in shellfish,
average-case risks within Puget Sound were substantially higher than those
outside Puget Sound.
For PCBs in fish, average-case and high-case risk levels exceeded
U.S. EPA's regulatory target range of 10'7 to 10"4 both inside and outside of
Puget Sound. Average-case risks for PCBs in fish were approximately the
same (2xlO"4 vs. 4xlO'4) within and outside Puget Sound. However, the
high-case risk level for individual locations within Puget Sound was
substantially less than that for locations outside of Puget Sound. Both
average-case and high-case risk levels associated with S DDT in fish from
Puget Sound were less than those for fish from locations outside of Puget
Sound. In Puget Sound, risk levels associated with S DDT in fish were
approximately 10"^ for average exposure conditions, and approximately
10"5 for high exposure conditions. In contrast, risks associated with S DDT
exposure to fish from locations outside of Puget Sound ranged from 10~4 for
average exposure conditions to approximately 10"2 for high exposure condi-
tions.
xxix
-------
Fish
10 1
10 "2 -
10 '3 -
10-4-
10 '5 -
<„•€
10 _
* 10 -7
tn
£ .n-8
_ 10 -
* *^* •
(
>
i
f I ^J
y
i i
-^
-*•
i i
i i
Z ARSENIC PAH PCBs alplU-HCH DDT«
i
tn ... 9 _
g 10-2 ^
X 10-3 -
UJ
10-4 -
10-5 _
10 -6 .
10
-7 _
10
-8
10
-9
10
10 '10 -
Shellfish
^P ™ "
il I ;
i
1
<
j,. «
II I I
•
1 -|
L
J
j
1
<
»
L
) -r-
( 1
"™ J-
i i
ARSENIC PAH PCBs atpha-HCH DDTs
LEGEND
WITHMPUGET SOUND OUTSIDE PUGET SOUND
<
' MAXMMJM
i AVERAGE <
• mlMWfl^UPlI •
' MAXIMUM
> AVERAGE
. MINIMUM
a Abwic* of dm may b* an artifact of t>w studw* Mtactad forth* nsk asswsment.
Data may tw avaibbl* from other studws.
Figure ES-3. Comparison of the ranges of risk estimates for carcino-
genic chemicals of concern in Puget Sound fish and
shellfish with those in fish and shellfish from locations
outside of Puget Sound.
xxx
-------
GRAPHICAL RISK CHARACTERIZATION
To characterize the range of variation in potential health risks
associated with chemical contaminants in Puget Sound seafood, graphs of
potential health risks were plotted as a function of a wide range of
possible contaminant concentrations and consumption rates for each chemical
of concern (Figures ES-4 to ES-11). These graphs allow estimation of
potential health risks associated with chemicals of concern in Puget Sound
seafood for a range of seafood types, possible consumption rates, and
locations. To assist in carcinogenic risk interpretation, risk levels
associated with naturally occurring contaminants in food (i.e., aflatoxin B
in peanut butter and PAH in charcoal broiled steaks), or anthropogenic
contaminants in drinking water (i.e., trichloroethylene) are indicated by
horizontal dashed lines. By using the methods and assumptions outlined above
(see Exposure Assessment), potential health risks were plotted for five
consumption rates in each graph. The lines plotted for these consumption
rates are only intended as examples. A scale is provided on each graph so
that health risks can be estimated for any consumption rate in the range of
0.001 to 1,000 g/day.
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, potential health risks associated with consumption of
chemically contaminated seafood from Puget Sound are primarily attributable
to PCS concentrations in fishes and the additive contributions of other
substances in other categories of seafood. For consumption of seafood from
Puget Sound, potential health risks, exclusive of the contribution of PCB,
are within the generally acceptable range of 10"6 to 10"^. However, with
the inclusion of PCB-contaminated fish, the potential cumulative health
risks associated with the consumption of chemically contaminated seafood may
exceed 10~* for certain locations in Puget Sound. These elevated risk
levels do not imply the existence of unique or pervasive chemical contamina-
tion in Puget Sound biota, but serve to indicate that portions of Puget
Sound, like other U.S. coastal areas, are subject to the legacy of past
uses and management of potentially toxic chemicals. In general, PCB
xxx i
-------
10s
x
X
X
10-*-,
10 «n
10'7 -
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
ARSENIC
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
I I I I I I I I I
0.000001 0.000010.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
I I I
1000 10,000 100.000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight)'
• 1 mg/kg wet weight - 1 ppm
a Four tablespoons per day
b 100 steaks per year
c 2 L per day at the U.S. EPA limit (0.005 mg/L)
PEANUT BUTTER
(AFLATOXIN B) a
CHARCOAL BROILED STEAK
IBENZO(A)PYRENE)b
DRINKING WATER
(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) c
Figure ES-4. Graphical risk characterization for arsenic in seafood.
-------
X
X
X
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0001
io2
10
3 _
s
o
o
UJ
i
*s
CARCINOGENIC
PAH
PEANUT BUTTER
(AFLATOXIN B)a
CHARCOAL BROILLD STtAK
IBENZO(A)PYRENE)b
DRINKING WATER
(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)c
\ 1 1 1 1 1 r
0.000001 0.000010.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1
T 1 1 1 I
10 100 1000 10.000 100,000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight)'
• 1 mg/Kg wet weight » 1 ppm
a Four tablespoons per day
b 100 steaks per year
c 2 L per day at the U.S. EPA limit (0.005 mg/L)
Figure ES-5. Graphical risk characterization for carcinogenic PAH in seafood.
-------
£ 10-3-,
IS
g 10"*-,
UJ 10'8T
tj 106.
10-7-
PCBs
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
>>././
' S' f
r i i i I I i
0.000001 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1
i i r^ i i
10 100 1000 10,000 100,000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight)'
• 1 mg/kg wet weight - 1 ppm
a Four tablespoons per day
b 100 steaks per year
c 2 L per day at the U.S. EPA limit (0.005 mg/L)
PEANUT BUTTER
(AFLATOXIN B) a
CHARCOAL BROILED STEAK
lBENZO(A)PYRENE)b
DRINKING WATER
(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)c
Figure ES-6. Graphical risk characterization for PCBs in seafood.
-------
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
x;
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
10
IS.^.. '.. Y. <./:,
* * * J* r f Jr f f /^ f * " f* * * ' f
0.000001 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10.000 100.000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight)*
• 1 mg/kg wet weight - 1 ppm
a Four tablespoons per day
b 100 steaks per year
c 2 L per day at the U.S. EPA limit (0.005 mg/L)
PEANUT BUTTER
(AFLATOXIN B)a
CHARCOAL BROILED STEAK
IBEN20(A)PYRENE]b
DRINKING WATER
(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) c
Figure ES-7. Graphical risk characterization for alpha-HCH in seafood.
-------
5
X
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
ID'2 -,
oc
oc
Ul
10*-
m io-8-i
f
10-7-J
DDT
1000 100 10
M 4 V
0.1 0.01 0.001
S
I I I I I I I I \
0.000001 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100
I I I
1000 10,000 100,000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight)'
. * 1mg/kg wet weight - 1 ppm
a Four tablespoons per day
b 100 steaks per year
c 2 L par day at the U.S. EPA limit (0.005 mg/L)
PEANUT BUTTER
(AFLATOXIN B) a
CHARCOAL BROILED STEAK
(BENZO(A)PYRENE)b
DRINKING WATER
(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) c
Figure ES-8. Graphical risk characterization for DDT, DDD, and DDE in seafood.
-------
X
X
X
100 -q
o
Z 10
i -
flC
o
Ul
8
1
O 0.1
0.01 -J
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
CADMIUM
1000 100
A
0.01 0.001
I,,
\
0.1
I
10
100
I I I
0.0001 0.001 0.01
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight) •
* 1 mg/kg wet weight = 1 ppm
—|I I
1000 10.000 100,000
Figure ES-9. Graphical risk characterization for cadmium in seafood.
-------
100 -a
o
0.1-
LEAD
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
jf. , IA i . l.i . In * LUL-L Lu—l /
0.01 -* JH'I /i i i
[ 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10.000 100.000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight) •
• 1 mg/kg wet weight - 1 ppm
Figure ES-10. Graphical risk characterization for lead in seafood.
-------
100 -a
a
o
Z 10
s
o
i
8
1 -d
u
c
O 0.1
0.01-1
MERCURY
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
jj J /JJJ fJAJ IAJ J /At J Lll J J
i n I I i r i i i i
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10.000 100.000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wat weight) •
• 1 mg/kg wet weight = 1 ppm
Figure ES-11. Graphical risk characterization for mercury in seafood.
-------
contamination in fish is a long-recognized, ubiquitous, and persistent
problem in various regions of the U.S. and in other industrialized nations
(Landrigan 1980; Belton et al. 1986; Swain 1988; Friberg 1988).
Finally, it should be recognized that tne method of risk estimation
used herein provides generally conservative estimates of health risk, and
focuses exclusively on recreational harvesters of Puget Sound seafood, who
comprise a subset of the general population in the Puget Sound basin.
Because of the conservative nature of U.S. EPA's risk assessment procedure,
and because of limitations in the available data, the results of this effort
should not be viewed as a definitive indication of potential health risks
associated with consumption of Puget Sound seafoods. The intent of the
report is to provide a framework for characterization of the relative hazard
associated with chemical contaminants in various seafood categories in Puget
Sound.
xl
-------
INTRODUCTION
Potentially toxic chemicals such as PCBs, pesticides, and metals may
accumulate in the edible tissues of fish, shellfish, and macroalgae harvested
from Puget Sound. Concern over the potential health risks associated with
consumption of locally harvested seafood prompted several recent studies of
catch and consumption patterns (Pierce et al. 1981; McCallum 1985; Landolt
et al. 1985, 1987) and chemical contaminants in the catch (Landolt et al.
1985, 1987) of recreational harvesters. Other studies have focused on
contaminant concentrations and potential health risks associated with
consumption of Puget Sound biota harvested in the vicinity of hazardous
waste sites or urbanized areas (PTI and Tetra Tech 1988a,b; Tetra Tech 1988;
Yake et al. 1984; Norton, D., 5 February 1986, personal communication).
During 1986-1987, a broad-scale survey of the extent of chemical contami-
nation in Puget Sound seafood was undertaken by several agencies. The
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region (EPA) X, the Washington
Department of Fisheries (WDF), the Washington Department of Ecology
(Ecology) and the Washington Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS)
sponsored sampling and analysis programs to determine concentrations of
pesticides, PCB, metals, and other chemicals in edible tissues of selected
fish, shellfish, and macroalgal (i.e., seaweed) species at a range of
locations throughout Puget Sound.
This report focuses entirely on recreational harvesters of Puget Sound
seafood who comprise a subset of the general population. For the purpose of
this analysis, recreational harvesters are defined as those individuals who
are frequent collectors of fish, shellfish, or edible seaweed for use in
personal consumption. Although not specifically addressed in this report,
potential risks associated with consumption of commercially harvested Puget
Sound seafood should be similar to those associated with consumption of
recreationally harvested Puget Sound seafood, assuming similar seafood
consumption patterns and seafood contamination levels.
1
-------
In order to conduct this risk evaluation it was necessary to make
assumptions and generalizations about patterns of seafood consumption. The
assumptions presented here may or may not reflect the full range of
consumption patterns actually existing within this population group, or the
range of seafood contaminant conditions existing in Puget Sound.
Because of uncertainties inherent in the risk assessment process, and
limitations in the available data, the objective of this report was not to
develop a definitive indication of potential health risks associated with
consumption of Puget Sound seafoods. The primary objectives of this report
were to provide resource management and health agencies with a general
indication of the magnitude of potential risks, provide an indication as to
whether immediate regulatory action was warranted to protect public health,
and to guide future data collection efforts. A secondary objective of this
report was to provide health agencies and the public with a tool that could
be used to easily estimate potential health risks associated with chemicals
in Puget Sound seafood as additional data becomes available in the future.
To meet these objectives, the report is organized into five major sections:
• Section 1. An overview and summary of the risk assessment
process
• Section 2. Compilation and review of Puget Sound data on
chemicals in seafood
• Section 3. Assessment of human health risks due to consump-
tion of Puget Sound seafood
• Section 4. Comparisons of seafood contaminant concentrations
and associated health risks in Puget Sound with those in
other U.S. coastal locations
• Section 5. A graphical tool for estimating health risks for
a wide range of exposure conditions.
-------
In summary, the intent of the report is to provide the public and regulatory
agencies with a framework for characterization of the relative hazard
associated with chemical contaminants in various seafood categories and
locations in the Puget Sound basin. Because of limitations in the available
data, the results of this effort should not be viewed as an indication of
absolute health risks. In general, highly conservative assumptions
concerning chemical toxicity and exposure are used to estimate potential
health risks. Because of the conservative nature of U.S. EPA's risk
assessment model, actual health risks to consumers of Puget Sound seafood
associated with the limited number of chemicals evaluated in this study are
likely to be less than the estimates of potential health risks provided in
this report. It is not known, however, to what extent nonmeasured chemicals
contribute to the overall health risks associated with seafood consumption.
-------
OVERVIEW AND SUMMARY OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS
OVERVIEW OF RISK ASSESSMENT
Risk assessment is a scientific procedure to determine the probability
of adverse health effects from a specific exposure to a toxic agent. Risk
assessment differs from risk management, although both are components of
regulatory decision-making (National Research Council 1983). Risk assessment
provides the scientific basis for public policy and action. In risk
management, risks are interpreted in light of legislative, socioeconomic,
technical, and political factors, and appropriate controls are determined.
Direct measurement of human health risks is possible in certain limited
circumstances. Such circumstances generally involve a single high exposure
or repeated moderate exposures to a specific chemical, and a clear cause-
effect relationship. For example, direct measurement of cancer risks might
be possible in a population of workers exposed to an industrial chemical
spill. In contrast, it is virtually impossible to directly measure the
health risks of eating seafood harvested from Puget Sound during recreational
activities. Models that predict health risks are therefore needed. Risk
assessment procedures used in this report focus on predicting health risks
from long-term exposure to relatively low levels of contamination.
The following sections provide an overview of the steps in risk
assessment. The general format for risk assessment and all definitions of
terms used in this report are consistent with those provided by National
Research Council (1983) and U.S. EPA (1986a,b,c,d). As indicated in
Figure 1, risk assessment is a multistep process comprised of the following
tasks:
• Hazard Assessment -- Selection of chemicals of concern and
qualitative evaluation of their potential to cause adverse
4
-------
RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS
DOSE-RESPONSE
ASSESSMENT
HAZARD ASSESSMENT
(Identify Chemicals of Concern)
RISK CHARACTERIZATION
UNCERTAINLY AND
PERSPECTIVE
EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
Figure 1. Overview of the risk assessment process.
-------
health effects (e.g., birth defects, cancer) in animals or in
humans
• Dose-Response Assessment -- Quantitative estimation of the
relationship between the dose of a substance and the
probability of an adverse health effect
• Exposure Assessment -- Characterization of the populations
exposed to the toxic chemicals of concern; the environmental
transport and fate pathways; and the magnitude, frequency,
and duration of exposure
• Risk Assessment -- Estimation of risk for the health effect
of concern, based on information from the dose-response and
exposure assessments
• Uncertainty Analysis -- Qualitative and where possible,
quantitative description of the assumptions and limitations
inherent in each step of the risk assessment.
A summary of the role that each of these steps plays in the risk
assessment process is provided below. Although these steps are discussed
sequentially, the risk assessment process is highly iterative. Information
developed in each step of the risk assessment is useful in subsequent steps
and provides feedback to preceding steps. For example, dose-response
information may be used in the hazard assessment step to select and
characterize chemicals of concern. Toxicity profiles developed in the
hazard assessment may affect selection of dose-response variables, and may
provide meaningful qualitative information for use in the risk characteri-
zation or uncertainty analysis.
The following summary is, for the most part, abstracted from several
recent U.S. EPA guidance manuals (Tetra Tech 1986; PTI 1987) on risk
assessment of chemically contaminated seafood. Further elaboration on the
-------
uses of risk assessment and risk management in evaluation of chemically
contaminated seafood is available in the U.S. EPA guidance manuals.
Hazard Identification
The first step in the risk assessment process is to define toxicological
hazards posed by the individual chemical contaminants in the seafood
samples. These hazards are defined by identifying chemicals of concern, and
by constructing a toxicity profile for each contaminant of concern.
The contaminants of concern for a particular seafood risk assessment
should be selected based on the following criteria:
• High persistence in the aquatic environment
• High bioaccumulation potential
• High toxicity to humans (or suspected high toxicity to humans
based on mammalian bioassays)
• Known sources of contamination in areas of interest
• High concentrations in previous samples of seafood from areas
of interest.
Further screening of chemicals is possible based on preliminary risk
analysis. For example, some chemicals have relatively low toxicity. Only
extremely high concentrations (e.g., >100 ppm) in seafood would cause
concern, assuming a high seafood consumption rate for 70 yr (for discussion
of consumption rates, see Exposure Assessment section).
Toxicity profiles consist of a summarization of qualitative and
quantitative aspects of chemicals of concern that provide an indication of
the types of health injury or disease that may occur under specific exposure
-------
conditions. The kinds of information that may be useful in developing
toxicity profiles include:
• Physical-chemical properties (e.g., chemical speciation,
vapor pressure, octanol water partition coefficients)
• Metabolic and pharmacokinetic properties (e.g., metabolic
degradation products, depuration kinetics)
• Toxic effects for specific routes of exposure (e.g., target
organs, cytotoxicity, carcinogenicity, mutagenicity).
Physical-chemical properties are important in determining the environmental
behavior of chemicals of concern and in evaluating the relative importance of
potential exposure pathways leading to human receptors. Metabolic and
pharmacokinetic properties are important in the characterization of the
behavior of a chemical within the body, including its assimilation,
transport, transformation, accumulation, and elimination. For a given
chemical of concern, toxic effects may be expressed in variety of ways
depending on the magnitude, duration, route of exposure, and sensitivity of
exposed individuals. Available toxicity information may be limited to
studies of experimental animals or may include a range studies on both
experimental animals and humans.
The range of information developed for the toxicity profiles is then
used to determine whether toxicity observed in experimental animals or
humans in one exposure setting could also occur in humans under the specific
exposure conditions of concern in the risk assessment. Toxicity profiles
may also influence the nature and extent of subsequent steps in risk
analysis. For example, the endpoint of concern in the dose-response
assessment may be selected based on the most severe adverse effect identified
in the toxicity profile. In the absence of quantitative data for other
steps in the risk assessment process, the toxicity profile constitutes the
best evaluation of risk. Toxicity profiles are available for approximately
8
-------
195 chemicals from the U.S. EPA, Office of Waste Programs Enforcement and
Office of Environmental Criteria and Assessment.
Dose-Response Assessment
After the potential hazard associated with each contaminant of concern
is characterized, the relationship between dose of a substance and its
biological effect is determined. Dose-response data are used to determine
the toxicological potency of a substance, a quantitative measure of its
potential to cause a specified biological effect. There may be many dose-
response relationships for a substance if it produces different toxic
effects under different conditions of exposure. However, risks associated
with a substance cannot be ascertained with any degree of confidence unless
dose-response relationships are quantified, even if the substance is known
to be "toxic".
In developing risk assessment methods, U.S. EPA recognized that
fundamental differences exist between carcinogenic dose-response variables
and noncarcinogenic dose-response variables that could be used to estimate
risks. Because of these differences, human health risk characterization is
conducted separately for carcinogens and noncarcinogens.
Key dose-response variables used in quantitative risk assessment are
potency factors for carcinogens and reference dose (RfD) values for
noncarcinogens. A generalized illustration of the role of these variables
in dose-response relationships for carcinogens and noncarcinogens is shown
in Figure 2. The carcinogenic potency factor [expressed in units of
(ing/kg/dayI"1! 1s typically determined by the upper 95 percent confidence
limit of slope of the linearized multistage model that expresses excess
cancer risk as function of dose. The model is based on high to low dose
extrapolation, and also assumes that there is no threshold for the initiation
of toxic effects.
The RfD (expressed in units of mg/kg/day) is an estimated single daily
chemical intake rate that appears to be without risk if ingested over a
-------
(0
DC
o
u.
O
O
111
O
IU
c
u.
LOW-DOSE
REGION OF
CONCERN
LEGEND
-StOPE - POTENCY FACTOR
DOSE OF CARCINOGEN
OBSERVED' DATA POINTS
• Chemical A
• Chemical B
MODELS
— —— Low Doaa Extrapolation
.1 ModetoFIWIhin
Observed Data Range
O
i
UJ
>
a
UJ
oc
u.
RH>
UF
Reterenoa Dose
Uncertainty Factor
NOAEL No Obaeived Adverse
EWects Uvel
DOSE OF NONCARCINOGEN
Figure 2. Hypothetical dose-response relationships for a
carcinogen, and a noncarcinogen.
10
-------
lifetime (Vettorazzi 1976, 1980; U.S. EPA 1980, 1987a; Dourson and Stara
1983). It is usually based on the relationship between the dose of a
noncarcinogen and the frequency of systemic toxic effects in experimental
animals or humans, and assumes that a threshold exists for the initiation of
toxic effects (Dourson and Stara 1983). The threshold of observed effects
is divided by an uncertainty factor to derive an RfD that is protective of
the most sensitive members of the population.
Exposure Assessment
Exposure assessment is the overall process that links sources and
distribution mechanisms of chemical contaminants in the environment to
human receptors. For risk assessment of chemically contaminated seafood,
the exposure assessment is typically conducted in a number of stages:
• Characterization of the environmental transport and fate
pathways of chemicals of concern
• Estimation of average concentrations of chemical of concern
in seafood species
• Characterization of potentially exposed populations,
including fisheries harvest activities and patterns of
seafood consumption
• Estimation of the magnitude and duration of the dose of each
chemical of concern incurred by the human receptor population.
Mathematical models of key physical and chemical processes, which may be
supplemented with experimental studies, are often relied upon to predict
transport and fate pathways. Uncertainties associated with such predictions
in the complex natural environment may be enormous, and may be avoided
altogether by direct measurement of contaminant concentrations in potential
exposure media. Thus, appropriately designed and conducted sampling and
11
-------
analyses prograas provide the best means for determining concentrations of
chemicals osf concern in edible portions of seafood species.
For risk assessment of chemically contaminated seafood, the characteri-
zation of exposed populations may include an identification of fisheries
harvest zones, analyses of fisheries activities within those zones, an
evaluation of the distribution of the catch, and characterization of
consumption patterns that can be used in dose estimation. Only selected
steps may be performed in a given exposure assessment, depending on data
availability, study objectives, and funding limitations. Where comprehensive
catch and consumption statistics are not available, estimates of seafood
consumption rates may be based on standard values for the U.S. population or
other assumed values.
Dose is the amount of a chemical received by an organism over a
specified time interval, and is usually expressed in units of mg chemical/kg
body wt/day. Because the oral route of exposure is the only route considered
for consumption of chemically contaminated seafood, dose estimation may be
based on the amount of a chemical that is ingested (i.e., an "ingested
dose") or on the amount of material that is ingested and assimilated by
absorption across the gastrointestinal lining (i.e., an "absorbed dose").
An ingested dose is obtained by multiplying the concentration of a chemical
in seafood (expressed in units of mg/kg wet wt) by in ingestion rate
(expressed in units of kg seafood/day), and dividing this product by an
estimated human body weight (expressed in kg). The absorbed dose is
obtained by multiplying the ingested dose by an assimilation coefficient.
The assimilation coefficient is actually a composite variable that indicates:
• Differences in actual assimilation efficiency between
experimental animals that were used to derive dose-response
variables and in humans
• Age-specific differences in absorption efficiency within the
human population
12
-------
• Differences in the bioavailability of a chemical between the
exposure medium used in determination of a dose-response
relationship (e.g., water) and the exposure medium of concern
in the risk assessment (e.g., seafood)
• Differences in chemical speciation between the exposure
medium used in determination of a dose-response relationship
(e.g., inorganic arsenic in drinking water) and the exposure
medium of concern in the risk assessment [e.g., total (i.e.,
inorganic plus organic) arsenic in seafood].
In summary, the dose, its duration and timing, and the characteristics of
the population receiving it are the critical measures of exposure for the
risk characterization.
Risk Characterization
In the risk characterization stage, the results of the dose-response
assessment and the exposure assessment are combined to estimate the
probability and extent of adverse effects associated with consumption of
chemically contaminated seafood. Because of fundamental differences between
dose-response variables for carcinogens and those for noncarcinogens, risk
characterization is conducted separately for carcinogens and noncarcinogens
(see Dose-Response section above).
In its simplest expression, carcinogenic risks are estimated as the
probability of excess lifetime cancer by multiplying the estimated human
dose by the carcinogenic potency factor. For noncarcinogens, risks are
expressed as a non-probabilistic risk index by dividing the estimated dose
by the reference dose. The risk index is compared to a value of 1 (i.e.,
where the estimated dose equals the reference dose) to evaluate the chemical
hazard (Stara et al. 1983; U.S. EPA 1985). Risk index values greater than
1 indicate that the estimated exposure is potentially of concern. Because
data on chemical interactions are limited, estimated risks for individual
chemicals are usually summed to obtain an approximate estimate of total risk
13
-------
for a chemical mixture. Because technological limitations preclude
analyzing seafood samples for all potentially toxic chemicals, risk
estimates should not be interpreted as estimates of total risk associated
with seafood ingestion.
The risk characterization step can be much more complicated than
indicated here (Tetra Tech 1986; PTI 1987). Independent risk estimates can
be calculated for each chemical in each exposure medium (e.g., different
species of seafood) at various locations defined in the exposure assessment.
Depending on the available data, risks can also be partitioned among subsets
of the exposed population. The objectives of such an approach are to
determine who is at risk and which combination of chemicals and media
account for that risk.
The results of the risk assessment may be presented in both a tabular
and graphic format. In the supporting text of a risk assessment, all final
estimates of risk should be rounded to one significant digit, or an order of
magnitude if appropriate.
Interpretation of noncarcinogenic risk index values is based on direct
comparisons with reference dose values and supporting information developed
in the toxicity profiles. Risk index values greater than one provide only a
general indication of concern for potential toxic effects. The severity of
such effects must be interpreted in light of information concerning the dose
response relationship for the specific chemical and toxic endpoint in
question.
Interpretation of carcinogenic risk estimates may be based on compari-
son of health risks for the study area with:
• Health risks for consumption of seafood from a reference area
• Health risks for consumption of alternative foods (e.g.,
charcoal broiled steak)
14
-------
• The range of allowable health risks determined in regulatory
decisions.
In general, U.S. EPA decisions concerning individual lifetime risk estimates
in the range of 10'7 to 10'3 are made on a case-by-case basis and are
strongly influenced by considerations of the population risk (Travis et al.
1987; Travis and Haltemer-Frey 1988). Population risk is an estimate of the
number of cancers produced within a population of specified size per
generation. High individual risk estimates may translate into low population
risk (i.e., less than 1) where the size of the exposed population is small.
Individual risk levels greater than 1
-------
• Uncertainties in high- to low-dose extrapolation of
bioassay test results, which arise from practical
limitations of laboratory experiments and variations in
extrapolation models.
3. Variance of site-specific consumption rates and contaminant
concentrations.
4. Uncertainties in the selection of assumed values for
consumption rates (e.g., 6.5 g/day, 20 g/day, and 165 g/day)
when site-specific data are not available.
5. Uncertainties in the efficiency of assimilation (or absorp-
tion) of contaminants by the human gastrointestinal system.
6. Variation of exposure factors among individuals, such as:
• Variation in fishery species composition of the diet
among individuals
• Variation in food preparation methods and associated
changes in chemical composition and concentrations due
to cooking.
7. Uncertainties associated with risks from chemical contaminants
that were not included in the analysis of seafood tissues, but,
nonetheless, may be present.
8. Adequacy of the study design to provide the numbers of samples
needed to describe accurately contaminant concentrations in each
species at various locations and times (e.g., seasons) throughout
the study area.
16
-------
9. Uncertainties in interpretive aspects of the risk characterization,
which arise from such factors as:
• Lack of data for contaminant concentrations in seafood
from relatively clean reference areas, which are needed
to describe accurately "background" levels of risk
associated with seafood consumption
• Lack of reference diet information needed to assess
accurately "background" concentrations of chemicals of
concern in non-seafood components of the diet, which may
be particularly important for comparisons of high
exposure populations, whose diet may include a dispropor-
tionate amount of seafood, with the general population,
whose diet may consist of an average amount of seafood
plus a variety of other foods
• Lack of additional risk-benefit information concerning
the influence of diet on other health endpoints (e.g.,
heart disease), which, again, may be important for
comparisons of high exposure populations, whose diet may
include a disproportionate amount of seafood, with the
general population, whose diet may consist of an average
amount of seafood plus a variety of other foods.
In conclusion, uncertainty ranges (e.g., 95 percent confidence
intervals) around estimates of mean risk may typically span 3-5 orders of
magnitude. The approach taken by U.S. EPA (1980, 1985, 1986a; Tetra Tech
1986; PTI 1987) is to estimate a plausible-upper limit to risk. In this
way, it is unlikely that risk will be underestimated substantially.
Moreover, the plausible-upper-limit estimate serves as a consistent basis
for relative risk comparisons.
17
-------
SUMMARY OF THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS FOR PUGET SOUND SEAFOOD
The risk assessment of chemical contaminants in Puget Sound seafood was
conducted in two phases. Phase 1 consisted of data compilation, identifi-
cation of candidate chemicals for further evaluation, and a hazard assess-
ment. The objective of Phase 1 was to identify chemicals of potential
concern for further risk analysis, and to determine if immediate regulatory
action was required. Phase 2 consisted of a detailed risk analysis for
chemicals of potential concern identified in the hazard assessment. The
Phase 2 analysis was based on a summary of average contaminant concentrations
and a variety of plausible exposure assumptions.
The compilation and review of Puget Sound data consisted of synthesizing
numerous data sources into a composite data set, and identification of
37 candidate chemicals for risk analysis. In the hazard assessment, data
concerning the frequency of detection, maximum concentration, toxic potency,
and metabolic and pharmacokinetic properties of the 37 candidate chemicals
were used to develop preliminary worst-case risk estimates. From these
preliminary estimates, eight chemicals or compound groups of concern were
selected for detailed evaluation of risks.
The dose-response assessment compiled dose-response variables for the 37
candidate chemicals and presented toxicity profiles for the subset of eight
chemicals of concern identified in the hazard assessment. The exposure
assessment consisted of an evaluation of the concentrations in biota of the
eight chemicals of concern by seafood category and sampling location within
Puget Sound. This task also included a summary of seafood consumption rates
that was based in part on recent surveys of recreational harvesters in Puget
Sound.
In the risk characterization, the dose-response information developed
in the toxicity assessment and consumption-rate information developed in the
exposure assessment were combined to quantitatively estimate the range of
health risks associated with consumption of seafood contaminated with the
eight chemicals of concern.
18
-------
Uncertainties, limitations, and assumptions are discussed qualitatively
at each stage of the risk assessment process. In general, uncertainty was
characterized by using a range of values and assumptions to estimate risks
associated with average exposure conditions and with plausible high exposure
conditions. Upper-bound exposure conditions consisted of using the upper
95 percent confidence limits of mean concentrations and reasonable high
estimates of seafood consumptions rates to determine dose levels associated
with ingestion of chemically contaminated seafood. Finally, additional
perspective was incorporated into the risk assessment by comparing con-
taminant concentrations in Puget Sound biota with those in biota from other
U.S. coastal areas.
To supplement the risk characterization, a separate section on
graphical characterization of risks for the eight chemicals of concern was
developed. The purpose of this section was to provide regulatory agencies
and the public with a generically formatted graphical tool that could be used
to easily estimate potential health risks associated with a wide range of
chemical concentrations and human consumption rates. The graphics will
provide a useful tool for rapidly evaluating potential health risks as
additional data become available for various locations throughout Puget
Sound.
19
-------
COMPILATION AND REVIEW OF PUGET SOUND DATA
Chemical contamination in the marine environment has been the subject
of numerous investigations in the past decade. In Puget Sound, these
investigations have ranged from general surveys of contaminant distribution
and bioaccumulation (e.g., Konasewich et al. 1982) to investigations of
site-specific problems associated with hazardous waste sites (Tetra Tech
1985). Some of these studies included information on contaminant bioaccumu-
lation in marine biota that was used to assess site-specific health risks
associated with ingestion of chemically contaminated seafood (e.g., Schwab
et al. 1987; Tetra Tech 1985, 1988). In general, these past investigations
indicate considerable variability in the severity and spatial extent of
contaminant bioaccumulation in Puget Sound biota, but do not provide a
comprehensive regional picture of potential health risks associated with
consumption of Puget Sound seafood. Consequently, this report was intended
to provide a regional overview of the magnitude of the health risk problem.
To accomplish this objective, contaminant bioaccumulation data were compiled
from a number of broad-scale surveys and site-specific investigations that
were conducted within the past 5 years using the most recent available
analytical methods. Data from previous studies that had assessed health
risks are not included here (e.g., Versar 1985; Tetra Tech 1985). However,
contaminant concentrations and health risks described in these studies can
be compared with those determined here by using the graphical risk charac-
terization model presented below (see Graphical Risk Characterization).
SOURCES OF DATA
The following data sets were evaluated for the risk assessment of
chemically contaminated seafood in Puget Sound:
• U.S. EPA and WDF 1987 survey of chemical contaminants in
salmon (data provided in Appendix A)
20
-------
• U.S. EPA 1986 survey of chemical contaminants in shellfish
(data provided in Appendix A)
• U.S. EPA and Ecology 1986 survey of chemical contaminants in
macroalgae (data provided in Appendix A)
• DSHS study of chemical contaminants in shellfish (Faigenblum
1988)
• Urban Bay Action Program data of toxic substances in fish from
Elliott Bay (PTI and Tetra Tech 1988a)
• Urban Bay Action Program data of toxic substances in fish and
crabs from Everett Harbor (PTI and Tetra Tech 1988b)
• National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) study
of potential toxicant exposure among consumers of recreational
fish caught in Puget Sound (Landolt et al. 1985, 1987)
• Ecology surveys of shellfish from contaminated areas in
Eagle Harbor and Budd Inlet (Yake et al. 1984; Norton, 0.,
5 February 1986, personal communication).
These studies ranged considerably in their objectives, survey design,
and sampling and analysis methods. However, the focus of each survey was to
characterize chemical contamination in industrialized or urbanized areas of
Puget Sound. Each survey also included one or more areas located well away
from urban centers or sources of industrial contaminants. Hence, the Puget
Sound seafood risk assessment is likely based on data that are representative
of the varying degrees of chemical contamination observed throughout the
sound.
21
-------
DATA QUALITY
In general, risk assessment methods depend on a wide number of
assumptions concerning toxicity and exposure which are then used to
extrapolate from measured contaminant concentrations in various media (e.g.,
fish) to potential health impacts in humans (see Risk Assessment section
below). Consequently, understanding the quality of the underlying data is a
critical step in defining limitations and uncertainties associated with
risk estimates.
There are a wide range of sampling, chain-of-custody, analytical, data
reporting, and interpretive problems associated with obtaining high quality
chemical data. These problems are typically identified for tissue chemistry
data sets during the data validation process. Uncertainties in data quality
are indicated in two ways:
• Quality assurance (QA) reviews that are submitted as inde-
pendent technical memoranda or included with the data report
• Attachment of qualifiers (i.e., footnotes) to specific
reported values.
The Puget Sound data sets described in the preceding section were
complete in that each had undergone QA review by the agency sponsoring each
survey, and, in most cases, the sample values that were of uncertain
validity were identified with qualifier footnotes. Although existing QA
reports were reviewed as part of this risk assessment, U.S. EPA did not
conduct independent QA evaluations of data generated by other agencies. In
general, data qualifiers indicate that a sample value should either be
rejected or considered as an estimate for a number of reasons, including:
• Exceedance of control limits for precision and accuracy
• Exceedance of allowable holding times
22
-------
• Detection of the compound in an associated blank
• Low recovery of the internal standard used for calibration
• No verification of tentatively identified compounds.
Quality assurance reviews and qualified sample values for the 1986-1987
multi-agency (i.e., U.S. EPA, WDF, DSHS, and Ecology) study of contaminant
concentrations in salmon, shellfish and macroalgae are presented in
Appendix A. Quality assurance reviews and data qualifiers for the remaining
studies are presented in published reports and technical memoranda by
Landolt et al. (1985, 1987), Faigenblum (1988), PTI and Tetra Tech (1988a,b),
Yake et al. (1984), and Norton (5 February 1986, personal communication).
The QA reviews and data qualifiers were used in this report in two
ways. In Phase 1, data qualifiers were used, among other criteria, to
identify "screening" quality data for a range of candidate chemicals. These
screening quality data were then used in a preliminary worst-case risk
evaluation to select chemicals of concern for further evaluation. Using
screening data in Phase 1 provided an expedient means for determining the
need for further risk evaluation (see Hazard Assessment Section below). In
Phase 2 of this study, a detailed characterization of potential health risks
associated with chemicals of concern was performed using only those data
that met all data quality objectives. By focusing Phase 2 of this study on
only high quality data, limitations inherent in chemical data that are of
uncertain validity, for whatever reason, were eliminated from the risk
assessment process.
SELECTION OF CANDIDATE CHEMICALS OF CONCERN
The selection of chemicals for evaluation in this risk assessment was
based on the results of the QA reviews for each of the studies as well as on
other criteria. Identification of candidate chemicals for the risk
assessment was conducted in several steps. An initial selection of the
available data was based on consideration of adequate sample identification.
23
-------
Further evaluation of samples that passed this initial selection was based
on the frequency of detection and data quality for individual chemicals.
Samples and their associated chemical analytes were selected for use in
this risk evaluation using the following criteria:
• Identification of sample locations. Only those samples that
could be clearly associated with specific locations in Puget
Sound were accepted for risk evaluation, thus permitting
spatial characterization of contaminant concentrations and
risks.
• Species identification. Only chemical analyses that were
performed on organisms from individual species, or from
organisms identified to genus level where species identifi-
cation was not possible, were accepted for risk evaluation.
Composite samples of two or more species within a seafood
category (e.g., bivalves) were only accepted for the risk
evaluation for certain locations where species-specific data
were not available.
Application of these general criteria resulted in eliminating a few samples
from the NOAA data sets (Landolt et al. 1987). However, elimination of these
samples did not affect the overall selection of chemicals of concern.
Among the samples that passed the initial data selection, chemical
analytical data were available for over 150 substances in biota collected
from various locations throughout Puget Sound. Candidate chemicals of
potential concern were selected from these samples using the following
criteria:
• Frequency of detection. A chemical must have occurred above
detection limits in at least one sample.
24
-------
• Data quality objectives. For each chemical that was detected
at least once, all data quality objectives for the respective
reports must have been met for at least one sample in which
the chemical was detected (i.e., substances were eliminated
from consideration if all of the detected values were
"qualified" with respect to data quality objectives).
The former criterion precluded risk assessment of chemicals that were never
detected in any of the biological samples. The latter criterion precluded
risk assessment of chemicals that may have been detected, but which were of
uncertain validity because the data values consistently failed to meet data
quality objectives. Application of these two contaminant selection criteria
resulted in the identification of 37 candidate chemicals or compound groups
(Table 1) for further evaluation of health risks associated with consump-
tion of chemically contaminated seafood.
Note that all of the available data for these 37 chemicals were carried
forward to the hazard assessment stage of Phase 1 of the risk assessment.
Because acceptance of all the data for each candidate chemical of concern
was only contingent upon the existence of one "unqualified" value, the data
for some of these 37 chemicals may include a high proportion of "qualified"
values. Consequently, the data at this stage of the risk assessment was
only considered suitable for screening purposes.
25
-------
TABLE 1. CHEMICALS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN IN PUGET SOUND SEAFOOD
Trace metals
LPAH
HPAH
Chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons
Chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons
Phthalates
PCBs
Pesticides
Ketones
Unsaturated alcohols
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromi urn
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
Anthracene
Phenanthrene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)fl uoranthene
Benzo(k) fluoranthene
Chrysene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Hexachlorobutadi ene
Hexachlorobenzene
Bis(ethylhexyl)phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
PCB-1254
PCB-1260
PCB-total
alpha-HCH (=alpha-BHC)
p,p'-DDD
p,p'-DDE
p,p'-DDT
alpha-Endosulfan
Heptachlor
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
Acetone
Vinyl acetate
26
-------
RISK ASSESSMENT
Further evaluation of the 37 chemicals or compound groups in Table 1
followed the general risk assessment guidelines established by the U.S. EPA
(1986a,b,c,d), as well as guidance developed for the Puget Sound Estuary
Program for risk assessment of chemically contaminated seafood (Tetra Tech
1986). Following data compilation and screening, data were available for
chemical contaminants in fish, shellfish, and macroalgae from 22 locations
in Puget Sound (Figure 3). The taxa sampled at one or more of these
locations are listed in Table 2. The number of taxa and kinds of algae and
animals sampled varied considerably among areas. Consequently, for the
purposes of the risk assessment, the various species were pooled into
categories that are more representative of differences in potential
ingestion rates and therefore human contaminant exposure (see Exposure
Assessment below). The various categories were fish, shellfish, kelp and
green algae, and red algae of the genus Porphyra (commonly known as nori).
HAZARD ASSESSMENT AND SELECTION OF CHEMICALS OF CONCERN
In the hazard assessment, the 37 chemicals of potential concern, these
chemicals were further characterized and prioritized by considering the
following factors:
• Preliminary worst-case risk evaluation
• The frequency of detection and maximum concentrations in
different categories of biota sampled throughout Puget Sound
• The toxicological characteristics of the various contaminants.
The objective of the preliminary risk evaluation was to use a range of
reasonable upper-bound assumptions to identify those substances from the
27
-------
ALKI POINT
AGATE PASS
ANACORTES
BIRCH BAY
BUDD INLET
BURLEY LAGOON
COMMENCEMENT BAY
DASH POINT
EAGLE HARBOR
10 EDMONDS
11 ELLIOTT BAY
EVERETT HARBOR
13 MANCHESTER
14 MUKILTEO
15 POINT JEFFERSON
1 6 POINT MADISON
POINT NO POINT
1 8 POINT PULLEY
1 9 PORT SUSAN
20 QUARTERMASTER HARBOR
21 ROLLING BAY
2 2 SINCLAIR INLET
Figure 3. Sampling areas for risk assessment of chemically
contaminated seafood.
28
-------
TABLE 2. SCIENTIFIC AND COMMON NAMES OF FISH, SHELLFISH,
AND MACROALGAE EVALUATED IN RISK ASSESSMENT
OF CHEMICALLY CONTAMINATED SEAFOOD
Category Type
Scientific Name
Common Name
Fish
Pelagic
Bottom feeding
Bottom fish
Shellfish Crab
Bivalve
Squid
Qncorhynchus kisutch
Oncorhynchus tshawytscha
Herluccius productus
Embiotoca lateralis
Sebastes spp.
Anoplopoma finbria
Gadus macrocephalus
Theragra chalcograima
Hicrogadus proximus
Parophrys vetulus
Platichthys stellatus
Citharichthys sordidus
Lepidopsetta bilineata
Hippogloissoides elassodon
Enophrys bison
Cancer magister
Cancer productus
Clinocardium nuttalli
Hacoma inquinata
Nacoma nasuta
Hacoma sect a
Macoma spp.
Hya arenaria
Protothaca staminea
Saxidomus giganteus
Tapes japonica
Tresus capax
Loligo opalescens
Macroalgae Brown algae (kelp) Laminaria spp.
Nereocystis spp.
Coho salmon
Chinook salmon
Pacific hake
Striped perch
Rockfi sh
Sablefish
Pacific cod
Walleye pollock
Tomcod
English sole
Starry flounder
Pacific sanddab
Rock sole
Flathead sole
Buffalo sculpin
Dungeness crab
Rock crab
Heart cockle
Bent nose clam
Sand clam
Softshell clam
Littleneck clam
Butter clam
Manila clam
Horseneck clam
Market squid
Green algae
Red algae
Ulva spp.
Porphyra spp.
Sea lettuce
Nori
29
-------
initial list of 37 chemicals that are truly of concern in Puget Sound
seafood. In this step, higher than average consumption rates and maximum
concentration values were used only to estimate the highest individual
chemical risks that could realistically occur, and to provide the sponsoring
agencies with guidance concerning the need for immediate regulatory action.
Hence, the preliminary risk evaluation constitutes a reasonable worst-case
analysis, and is not intended to indicate actual health risks for seafood
harvesters under more probable exposure conditions. For this reason,
results of the preliminary risk evaluation are only presented in a summary
tabular form and are not presented in detail in this report.
The preliminary risk estimates (Table 3) were based on the maximum
concentrations observed for the various categories of seafood and on dose-
response variables for carcinogenic substances (i.e., carcinogenic potency
factors) and noncarcinogenic substances [i.e., reference dose values
(RfDs)]. Details concerning sources of information for the dose-response
variables, and how dose-response variables are used in risk estimation are
provided below in the Toxicity Assessment and Exposure Assessment sections.
The following major assumptions were used in these preliminary worst-case
risk estimates:
• Average daily consumption rate of seafood is 26.1 g/day
• Exposure occurs daily over a 70-yr lifetime
• A representative body weight for a lifetime of exposure is
70 kg
• Absorption efficiency is 1 percent for ingested arsenic and
100 percent for the other chemicals.
As discussed below in the Exposure Assessment, estimates of the average daily
consumption rate for fish range from 1.9 to 26.1 g/day. Consequently, a
value of 26.1 g/day is a maximum estimate for average daily consumption of
fish and was used in preliminary risk estimates.
30
-------
TABLE 3. PRELIHINARY RISK ESTIMATES FOR CHEMICALS OF CONCERN IN FISH, SHELLFISH, AND MACROALGAE
Chemical Class
Metals
LPAH
HPAH
Chlorinated aliphatics
Chlorinated aroma tics
Phthalates
PCBs
Pesticides
Ketones
Unsaturated alcohols
Chemical
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmiua
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
Anthracene
Phenanthrene
Benzo( a )anthracene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benzo(b)f luoranthene
Benzo(k)f luoranthene
Chrysene
F luoranthene
Pyrene
Hexachl orobutadiene
Hexachl orobenzene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Di-n-octyl phthalate
PCB-1254
PCB-1260
PCBs- total
Alpha-HCH
ODD, 4,4'
DDE, 4,4'
DDT, 4,4'
Endosul fan-alpha
Heptachlor
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
Acetone
Vinyl acetate
N
26
299
301
72
218
278
347
35
59
90
234
46
46
46
46
46
28
46
46
46
124
125
9
9
102
85
241
217
283
291
292
84
217
8
8
8
8
Percent
Detected
34.6
100.0
88.7
86.7
100.0
63.3
90.7
74.3
81.4
34.4
100.0
54.3
65.2
32.6
34.8
41.3
28.6
37.0
69.6
45.7
6.0
30.8
44.4
66.7
52.9
17.6
98.8
2.8
18.0
49.5
13.4
1.2
0.9
62.5
25. 0
87.5
50.0
Maxinun Potency Factor
(ug/kg) (mg/kg/d)"1
80
22,100
1,280
2,330
30,180
4,460
260
1,900
300
91
49,300
130
740
210
58
120
3
360
970
920
1.79
7.68
1,000
1,700
210
13
2,060
6
31
410
28
3
2
85
34
13,000
43
1.500
11.500
11.500
11.500
11.500
0.078
1.670
7.700
7.700
7.700
11.120
0.340
0.340
0.340
4.500
RfD
(ma/kg/d)
0.0004
0.0003
0.0050
0.0370
0.0014
0.0003
0.0200
0.0030
0.0030
0.2100
0.0020
0.0200
0.0005
0.0001
0.0500
0.1000
Dose*' Carcinogenic Noncarcinogenic
(mg/kg/d) Risk0 Risk Index"
3.0E-05
8.2E-05*
4.BE-04
8.7E-04
1.1E-02
1.7E-03
9.7E-05
7.1E-04
1.1E-04
3.4E-05
1.8E-02
4.8E-05
2.8E-04
7.8E-05
2.2E-05
4.5E-05
1.1E-06
1.3E-04
3.6E-04
3.4E-04
6.7E-07
2.9E-06
3.7E-04
6.3E-04
7.8E-05
4.8E-06
7.7E-04
2.2E-06
1.2E-05
1.5E-04
1.0E-05
1.1E-06
7.5E-07
3.2E-05
1.3E-05
4.8E-03
1.6E-05
1E-04
9E-04
2E-04
5E-04
2E-03
5E-08
5E-06
6E-04
4E-05
6E-03
2E-05
4E-06
5E-05
4E-06
3E-06
0.075
1.646
0.174
0.304
1.188
0.323
0.035
0.037
0.011
0.088
0.019
0.022
0.0006
0.048
* Estimated dose = [concentration (mg/kg food) x ingestion rate (kg food/day)]/[body weight (70 kg)].
** Assunes an ingestion rate of 26.1 g/d over a 70-yr lifetime.
0 Carcinogenic risk = 1- exp(-potency factor x estimated dose).
d Noncarcinogenic risk index = estimated dose/RfD.
e Assunes that 1 percent of the maxi(nun value exists as inorganic arsenic.
-------
The preliminary risk estimates and the frequency of detection infor-
mation (Table 3) were used to select chemicals or compound groups of
potential concern for further evaluation. Based on the results of the
preliminary risk estimates, the various chemicals were categorized into high-
priority, medium-priority, and low-priority groups (Table 4). The criteria
used to categorize the chemicals and an explanation of the derivation of
these criteria are as follows:
• High priority -- risk estimates greater than NT5 for car-
cinogens, and risk indices greater than 1 for noncarcinogens
• Medium priority -- risk estimates ranging from NT6 to 10'5
for carcinogens, and risk indices ranging from 0.25 to 1 for
noncarcinogens
• Low priority -- risk estimates less than 10'6 for carcinogens,
and risk Indices less than 0.25 for noncarcinogens.
Dose-response variables and methods of risk estimation for carcinogens
differ substantially from those for noncarcinogens (see Toxicity Assessment
and Risk Characterization sections). Consequently, the risk-based criteria
for prioritization of the carcinogens differ from those for noncarcinogens.
In general, carcinogenic risk estimates indicate the probability of excess
cancer over a lifetime of exposure. For noncarcinogens, a risk index is
based on a comparison with a reference dose, which is an estimated single
daily chemical intake rate that appears to be without risk if ingested over
a lifetime. Thus, a noncarcinogenic risk index that is greater than 1
indicates that lifetime exposure exceeds the level at which toxic effects
may be observed.
Based on the results of the preliminary risk evaluation, the chemicals
of concern selected for further risk analysis included all of the high-
priority chemicals or compound groups and one medium-priority chemical
(mercury). The carcinogenic chemicals or compound groups of concern are
32
-------
TABLE 4. CATEGORIES OF CANDIDATE CHEMICALS1 OR COMPOUND GROUPS
BASED ON PRELIMINARY RISK ESTIMATES
Priority
Highb
Toxic Class
Carcinogens
Chemical or Compound Group
Arsenic
Mediumd
Low6
Noncarcinogens
Carcinogens
Noncarcinogens
Carcinogens
Noncarcinogens
PCBs (total PCB, PCB-1254, PCB-1260)
alpha-HCH
DDT and related compounds (DDD and DDE)
Cadmium
Lead
Hexachlorobenzene
Heptachlor
Mercury
Copper
Hexachlorobutadi ene
Antimony
Chromi urn
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Zinc
Bi s(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Alpha-endosulfan
2-Butanone
Acetone
* Some chemicals were not categorized because dose-response information
needed to estimate risks was not available (see Dose-Response Assessment).
These substances were anthracene, phenanthrene, benzo(k)fluoranthene,
fluoranthene, pyrene, di-n-octyl phthalate, 2-hexanone, and vinyl acetate.
b Based on worst-case carcinogenic risks >10"5, and on worst-case noncar-
cinogenic risk index >1.
c Includes benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)fluoranthene, and
chrysene.
d Based on worst-case carcinogenic risks that range from 10"6 to 10"5, and on
worst-case noncarcinogenic risk index that ranges from 0.25 to 1.
e Based on worst-case carcinogenic risk <10'6, and on worst-case noncar-
cinogenic risks <0.25.
33
-------
arsenic, carcinogenic PAH [benzo(a)anthracene, benzo(a)pyrene, benzo(b)fluor-
anthene, and chrysene], PCB, alpha-HCH, and X DDT (i.e., ODD, DDE, DDT).
Note that the carcinogenic PAH, PCB, and 2 DDT are compound groups, each of
which is comprised of a number of individual substances. However, from the
risk assessment perspective, the individual substances within each of these
groups are similar toxicologically and, based on present information, are
assigned identical dose-response variables. Hence, the maximum risk
estimate for an individual substance within a compound group was used to
categorize the group as a whole.
The noncarcinogenic chemicals of concern are cadmium, lead, and
mercury. Of these, cadmium and lead exceeded a risk index of 1. However,
the inclusion of mercury was considered important because it is highly
bioaccumulative in aquatic organisms, is of special concern to segments of
the public that consume more than 37.3 g of fish per day (i.e., 15 Ib/yr),
and may contribute to cumulative toxic effects in organs affected by cadmium
and lead exposure (Table 5) (U.S. EPA 1984e).
Medium-priority chemicals that were not selected as chemicals of
concern were hexachlorobenzene, heptachlor, and copper. The preliminary
risk estimates for these chemicals were within an "acceptable" range as
determined by past regulatory decisions. Hexachlorobenzene and heptachlor
were omitted because their frequency of detection (0.9-24 percent) was much
lower than that for mercury (91 percent). Copper was omitted for several
reasons: it is an essential trace element; its risk index (0.30) was lower
than that for mercury (0.32); its maximum concentration was within the range
of legal tolerances established by various countries (see Tetra Tech 1986);
and, with the exception of individuals suffering from Wilson's disease
(i.e., a metabolic disorder resulting in excessive accumulation of copper),
it is well-regulated physiologically in humans (Carson et al. 1986).
Dose-response information was not available for 8 of the 37 candidate
chemicals of potential concern: anthracene, phenanthrene, benzo(k)fluor-
anthene, fluoranthene, pyrene, di-n-octyl phthalate, 2-hexanone, and vinyl
acetate. Hence, these chemicals could not be evaluated for potential toxic
34
-------
TABLE 5. TOXICITY PROFILES OF CHEMICALS OF CONCERN
Carcinogens
Arsenic
PCBs
PAHs
DDT
alpha-HCH
The carcinogenic potency factor is based on the probability
of excess skin cancer resulting from the ingestion of
inorganic arsenic (U.S. EPA 1984a). Development of lung
tumors is the primary carcinogenic endpoint of inhalation.
Other toxic endpoints of concern are neurological disorders,
especially in children exposed to acutely toxic concentrations
(U.S. EPA 1984a).
The liver and cutaneous tissues are primary target organs for
both oral and inhalation routes of exposure. PCB exposure in
experimental animals is associated with hepatocellular
carcinoma, hepatotoxicity, fetotoxicity, and development of
skin lesions (IARC 1978). In humans, PCB exposure is
associated with skin lesions (chloracne), liver dysfunctions,
and sensory neuropathy (Kuratsune 1976), and may be fetotoxic
(Fein et al. 1984; Rogan et al. 1986).
Potency estimation of the careinogenicity of PAHs as a class
of compounds is based on the data from a single PAH compound,
benzo(a)pyrene (BaP). This approach assumes that all carcino-
genic PAHs are equal in potency to BaP. BaP causes tumors
systemically and at the site of exposure in experimental
animals. For example, oral ingestion may produce stomach
tumors and inhalation may result in lung tumors in addition
to systemic neoplasms. Data on carcinogenic effects to
humans consist of epidemiological studies with PAH-containing
mixtures (soots, tars, oils, etc.) (IARC 1973, 1983; U.S. EPA
1981).
Several studies have demonstrated that oral exposure of
experimental animals to DDT is associated with benign liver
tumors (U.S. EPA 1984b). Pertinent data on the carcinogen-
icity of inhaled DDT are not available. No human data on ODT
carcinogen!city are available.
The carcinogenic potency factor is based on the occurance of
liver tumors in exposed mice; no other species are sensitive
to alpha-HCH carcinogenicity (U.S. EPA 1984c). No data are
available for their teratogenic or reproductive toxicological
potentials. Human data are similarly unavailable.
35
-------
TABLE 5. (Continued)
Nencarcinoqens
Lead
Mercury
The major toxic endpoint of concern for low-level chronic
oral ingestion of cadmium is kidney damage (proteinuria),
resulting from cadmium accumulation in the renal cortex
(Friberg et al. 1974). Cadmium has been shown in animal
studies to be potentially fetotoxic.
Lead is associated with a variety of blood, neurological, and
reproductive disorders (U.S. EPA 1984d). Special populations
at risk are children, prenatal infants, and pregnant women.
Anemia, due to inhibition of hemoglobin systhesis and a
reduction in the lifespan of circulating red blood cells, is
an early manifestation of lead poisoning. Exposure to
relatively low levels of lead may cause lesions in the
central and peripheral nervous systems and permanent
learning disabilities in children that are clinically
undetectable. Lead has a toxic effect on conception,
pregnancy, and the fetus in both humans and experimental
animals.
Mercury in aquatic organisms occurs principally as methyl
mercury. The reference dose for mercury is based on toxicity
studies of methyl mercury exposure to experimental animals.
Methyl mercury damages primarily the central nervous system
in both adults and prenatal infants, causing paresthesia as
mild effects, and constricted visual field and ataxia as
severe and irreversible effects (U.S. EPA 1984e). Populations
at risk are pregnant women and young children.
36
-------
potency. As indicated in Table 3, the frequency of detection for these
substances ranged from* 29-70 percent for PAH compounds, and 25-67 percent
for other comparables. Thus, the absence of available dose-response
information for some of the PAH constitutes an unquantifiable uncertainty
in the risk assessment. However, it should be recognized that the phthalates
and ketones (2-hexanone and 2-butanone, acetone) are often detected as
analytical contaminants in environmental chemistry samples and may not be
representative of environmental contamination.
Qualitative aspects of the range of target organs, toxic effects, and
sensitive populations that may be affected by the eight chemicals of concern
are provided in Table 5.
DOSE-RESPONSE ASSESSMENT
Available dose-response information for quantitative risk assessment is
summarized in Table 6 for the 37 candidate chemicals. These variables were
used for the preliminary risk determination and selection of the eight
chemicals of concern described in the Hazard Assessment. Potency factors
and weight of evidence ratings for carcinogens and RfD values, and confidence
ratings for noncarcinogens were collated from a variety of sources, including
the following:
• U.S. EPA Integrated Risk Information System database (IRIS)
• U.S. EPA Public Health Risk Evaluation Database (PHRED)
• U.S. EPA (1987a,b,c) health advisory documents
• U.S. EPA (1986d) Superfund Public Health Evaluation Manual
• U.S. EPA (1988) drinking water criteria for PCBs.
Several assumptions were made in compiling dose-response information for
the candidate chemicals. For example, toxic potency of trace metals can vary
37
-------
TABLE 6. DOSE-RESPONSE INFORMATION FOR CHEMICALS DETECTED IN FISH, SHELLFISH, AND NACROALGAE
Carcinogens
Chemical Class
Metals
LPAH
HPAH
Chlorinated aliphatic compounds
Chlorinated aromatic conpounds
Phthalates
PCBs
Pesticides
Ke tones
Unsaturated alcohols
Potency Factor
Chemical (no/kg/da/)"1
Antimony
Arsenic
Cadmium
Chromium (VI)
Copper
Lead
Mercury (methyl)
Nickel
Selenium
Si Iver
Zinc
Anthracene
Phenanthrene
Benzo( a ) anth racene
Benzo(a)pyrene
Benio(b)fluor«nthene
Benzo( k) f I uoranthene
Chrysene
F I uoranthene
Pyrene
Hexach lorobutadi ene
Hexach I orobenzene
Bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate
Oi-n-octyl phthalate
PCBs- total
PCS- 1254
PCS- 1260
alpha- HCH
ODD, 4,4'
DDE, 4,4'
DDT, 4,4'
Endosul fan-alpha
Heptachlor
2-Butanone
2-Hexanone
Acetone
Vinyl acetate
1.500C
11.500
11.500
11.500
11.500
0,078
1.670
7.700
7.700
7.700
11.120
0.340
0.340
0.340
4.500
Weight of
Evidence*
A
D
82
B2
B2
D
B2
C
B2
82
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
B2
Noncarcinooens
RfD
(mg/kg/day)
0.0004
0.0003
0.0050
0.0370
0.0014
0.0003
0.0200
0.0030
0.0030
0.2100
0.0020
0.0200
0.0005
0.0001
0.0500
0.1000
Confb
denceb
1
1
2
2
1
2
2
2
1
2
2
* Weight of evidence ratings are (A) human carcinogen, (B1) probable human carcinogen based on limited epidemiological
evidence, (B2) probable hunan carcinogen based on evidence from animal studies, (C) possible human carcinogen, (D) not
classifiable as to human carcinogenicity, (E) evidence of noncarcinogenicity in humans.
Confidence ratings are low (1), medium (2), and high (3).
c Potency factor based on interim reconmendation of the U.S. EPA Risk Assessment Forum.
-------
with trace metal speciation, but only total trace metal concentrations were
measured. Consequently, the RfD for chromium VI (0.005 mg/kg/day) was used
instead of that for chromium III (1 mg/kg/day) to provide a protective
estimate of potential risks associated with chromium ingestion. For
mercury, the RfD for methyl mercury was assumed because other studies have
shown that methyl mercury is the principal species present in fish (U.S. EPA
1984e).
The published carcinogenic potency factor [15 (mg/kg/day)"1] for
inorganic arsenic is under revision by the U.S. EPA Risk Assessment Forum.
U.S. EPA Region X has adopted the Risk Assessment Forum's recommendation
for an interim arsenic potency of 1.5 (mg/kg/day)"1, which is the value
assumed for the seafood risk assessment (Cirone, P., 9 September 1988,
personal communication). Also, the carcinogenic potency factor for arsenic
is based on ingestion of inorganic arsenic. Arsenic in seafood occurs
primarily as complex methylated or organic chemical species, which are less
toxic and more readily excreted than inorganic arsenic. Research on arsenic
speciation in seafood indicates that approximately 1 percent of the total
arsenic is in the inorganic form (Crecelius, E., 21 March 1988, personal
communication; Crecelius and Apts 1985; Cull en, W., 24 March 1988, personal
communication; Landolt et al. 1987). Hence, because total arsenic was
measured in biota collected from various locations in Puget Sound, 1 percent
of the concentration of total arsenic was used to estimate risks associated
with seafood consumption.
Benzo(a)pyrene is the only PAH with an established carcinogenic potency
factor. Consequently, the carcinogenic potency factor for benzo(a)pyrene
[11.5 (mg/kg/day)"1] was assumed for other PAH that are either known or
probable human carcinogens.
As indicated in Table 6, the carcinogenic PAH are potentially the most
toxic of the carcinogens, and alpha endosulfan is potentially the most toxic
of the noncarcinogens. However, health risks depend on two factors: toxic
potency (expressed as a carcinogenic potency factor for carcinogens or as a
RfD for noncarcinogens) and dose, which is a function of contaminant
39
-------
concentration in a medium of exposure. Thus, as indicated in the Hazard
Assessment, preliminary risk estimates based on maximum detected concentra-
tions of contaminants in biota collected from Puget Sound indicate that the
chemicals or compound groups of concern are: arsenic, cadmium, lead,
mercury, carcinogenic PAH, PCB, alpha-HCH, and SOOT.
EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT
The exposure assessment for consumption of chemically contaminated
seafood from Puget Sound was performed in three parts. First, the concentra-
tions of the eight chemicals of concern in Puget Sound biota were summarized
by seafood category and sampling location, and were compared with available
FDA tolerances or action levels. Second, seafood consumption rates based in
part on recent surveys of recreational harvesters in Puget Sound were
summarized. Finally, chemical concentration data and consumption rates were
combined to estimate the average daily dose associated with each chemical of
concern.
Concentrations of Chemicals i)f Concern
Data for the eight chemicals of concern were summarized using SAS, a
statistical software program. The following variables were entered into SAS
files for tracking and evaluation of the available data: project, sample
location, sample number, species sampled, concentration of each of the
chemicals of concern in each sample, and detection limits and data qualifiers
associated with the concentration of each chemical in each sample. These
data are listed in Appendix B. A summary of the total number of data values
for each chemical of concern in the various seafood categories and locations
in Puget Sound is provided in Table 7. For many locations and seafood
categories, data were either unavailable or extremely limited for some of
the chemicals of concern. This uneven representation of chemicals, sampling
areas, and seafood categories represents a major limitation in spatial
characterization of risks.
40
-------
TABLE 7. TOTAL NUMBER OF QUALIFIED AND UNQUALIFIED DATA VALUES FOR CHEMICALS OF CONCERN IN VARIOUS CATEGORIES OF SEAFOOD COLLECTED IN PUGET SOUND
Area
Alki Point
Anacortes
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Bur ley Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Commencement Bay
Dash Point
Elliott Bay
Seafood
Category
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Trace Metals
Arsenic
..
12
--
-•
2
•-
--
•"
..
10
--
..
10
4
"
..
6
--
••
..
13
--
--
27
2
9
" ~
.-
12
--
40
3
9
4
Cadmium
..
13
--
--
2
--
--
••
..
11
--
..
11
4
"
.-
7
--
..
._
14
--
--
27
2
9
• "
..
12
--
--
38
3
9
4
Lead
..
9
--
•-
2
--
--
••
..
9
--
• •
..
8
4
-•
..
5
--
••
..
12
--
--
27
2
9
_.
..
8
--
••
37
3
9
4
Mercury
_.
11
--
•-
2
--
--
.-
8
--
* •
..
9
4
-•
..
5
--
• •
..
12
--
--
17
--
9
• •
..
10
--
73
3
9
4
B(a)A
..
2
•-
..
•-
--
• •
..
2
•-
..
4
1
.-
1
--
• •
..
3
--
1
--
1
• •
..
3
••
2
--
1
PAH
B(b)F
--
2
--
-.
--
--
• •
..
2
--
~ ™
..
4
1
• •
--
1
--
~ "
..
3
--
• •
1
--
1
~ ~
..
3
--
~ •
2
--
1
Chrysene
..
2
-•
• •
--
--
--
• •
-.
2
--
" "
..
4
1
• •
--
1
--
™ "
..
3
--
• •
1
--
1
~ ™
..
3
--
~ ~
2
--
1
" *
B(8)P
-.
2
--
--
-•
--
~ *
-.
2
--
~ "
..
4
1
~ *
--
1
--
~ "
..
3
••
• •
1
-•
1
"
-.
3
""
2
--
1
" "
1254
--
3
""
2
••
--
~ m
.-
3
--
™ "*
..
1
4
~ "
--
2
--
™ ™
..
4
--
~*
7
-•
9
"
--
4
" •
"
9
--
9
4
PCBs
1260 Total
..
2
..
—
2
--
--
• • - —
..
2
--
* * - -
..
..
4
™ " " ~
..
1
--
™ ™ ™ ™
..
3
-•
• * » «
7 16
1
9
"
..
3
.. - -
"
9 82
3
9
4
Chlorinated Pesticides
HCH 000 DDE DDT
--
2
--
—
2
..
•-
"
--
2
"
"
--
••
4
"
--
1
••
--
3
" ~
"
7
""
9
--
3
™ "
64
--
9
4
--
2
~ "
2
••
"
--
2
- -
--
--
4
""
--
1
--
3
* *
19
* •
9
--
3
_ *
73
3
9
4
--
3
~ ~
2
"
--
3
--
1
4
--
2
* -
--
4
" **
18
" ™
9
--
3
"
73
3
9
4
-.
3
2
"
--
3
--
1
4
--
2
• •
--
4
™ ~
19
" "
9
--
3
"
73
3
9
4
-------
TABLE 7. (Continued)
IN)
Area
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
Point Pulley
Port Susan
Edmonds
Agate Pass
Point Madison
Seafood
Category
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
.... Tmt
Metal*
Arsenic Cadmium Lead
1
3
3
..
m —
12
-•
--
7
..
a
3
19
12
• -
•-
..
--
-•
•-
..
--
-•
••
27
6
--
--
4
--
••
•-
11
-•
--
i
3
3
-•
..
13
..
--
7
..
8
3
18
13
--
-•
..
..
--
--
..
--
-•
--
25
7
• •
•-
4
--
--
--
11
• -
--
1
3
3
--
11
—
7
8
3
18
10
-.
••
._
..
-.
•-
..
--
• -
-•
25
7
-•
--
4
-.
--
••
11
-.
--
PAH
Mercury B(a)A B(b)F Chrysene B(a)P
55 1111
15 3333
3 1111
11 3333
--
7
8 1111
3
4
10 2222
..
•-
5
..
,.
-.
5
1
..
..
9 •-
2
--
.. .. ..
4
-.
..
--
11
--
-.
--
PCBs Chlorinated Pesticides
1254 1260 Total HCH
1 1 54 55
3 3 12 15
33-- 3
43-- 3
..
77- 7
88- 8
33- 3
!2
322 2
..
..
.... 5 5
..
..
..
.... 5 5
1 1
..
..
17
7
..
--
4
--
..
11
-.
..
••
ODD
55
15
3
--
3
..
--
7
..
8
3
5
4
--
--
5
--
--
•-
5
1
--
--
10
2
..
--
4
_.
..
--
10
..
..
--
DDE
55
15
4
--
..
3
-.
--
7
--
8
3
5
5
•-
--
5
--
• -
•-
5
1
--
--
10
2
..
--
4
..
..
--
10
..
..
--
DDT
55
15
4
--
_ .
3
-.
--
7
-.
8
3
5
5
--
5
--
--
--
5
1
--
--
10
2
..
--
4
..
--
--
10
..
..
--
-------
TABLE 7. (Continued)
Area
Manchester
Point Jefferson
Rolling Bay
Eagle Harbor
Point Blakely
Seafood
Category
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Trace Metals
Arsenic Cadvium Lead Mercury
4444
5555
..
8888
1111
PAH PCBs
B(a)A B(b)F Chrysene B(a)P 1254 1260 Total
- -- 4
" " " " " ". .?
1111
12 12 12 12 8
1111 1
Chlorinated
HCH ODD
5
5
..
..
--
Pesticides
DDE DDT
5
5
--
--
--
5
5
--
--
--
-------
Risk assessment depends on a wide range of assumptions, each of which
generate some level of uncertainty in the risk characterization. Some of
the major uncertainties in the available data, and the approaches that were
used to minimize or eliminate these uncertainties, are outlined below.
Although Dungeness crab and other crab species are an important
recreational fishery TrTPuget Sound, limited chemical concentration data in
crabs were only available for a few locations. Additional uncertainty in
the use of the crab data concerned compatibility of assumed ingestion rates
for crab and those for other shellfish species. Consequently, crab data
were not used in either the exposure assessment or the risk characterization.
A major uncertainty associated with chemical concentration data
concerns the use of values where chemical analyses did not meet data quality
objectives (see Compilation and Review of Data above). To eliminate this
uncertainty from the risk characterization, only those data that met all the
data quality objectives of their respective studies were used in the
exposure assessment and subsequently in the risk characterization of the
eight chemicals of concern. The total number of unqualified data values for
each chemical of concern in the various seafood categories and locations in
Puget Sound are presented in Table 8. For all of Puget Sound, the total
numbers of unqualified data values ranged from 7 for trace metals and
chlorinated organic compounds in nori to 185 for PCBs in fish.
An additional uncertainty associated with chemical concentration data
concerns the use of quantification limits of substances that were not
detected. All chemical analytical methods have a lower limit below which
chemicals cannot be quantified. The use of this quantification limit
provides additional uncertainty in the exposure assessment. There are three
options for handling data associated with substances that were not detected:
• Option 1. Omit the sample entirely from the exposure
assessment
44
-------
TABLE 8. NUMBER OF UNQUALIFIED DATA VALUES FOR CHEMICALS OF CONCERN IN
VARIOUS SEAFOOD CATEGORIES FROM LOCATIONS THROUGHOUT PUGET SOUND
Area
Alki Point
Anacortes
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Bur ley Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Commencement Bay
Dash Point
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Point Mo Point
Seafood
Category Arsenic Cadmiun
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
..
12
--
•-
2
--
--
--
..
10
--
•-
..
10
4
•-
..
6
--
--
..
13
--
-•
27
2
9
-•
..
12
--
• •
40
3
9
4
1
3
3
~*
-.
12
--
-•
7
--
8
3
_„
13
--
--
2
--
--
--
..
11
--
-•
..
11
4
••
.-
7
--
--
..
14
--
••
27
2
9
••
..
12
•-
•~
38
3
9
4
1
3
3
•~
--
13
--
•~
7
--
8
3
Lead Mercury
..
9
--
--
2
--
--
•-
..
9
--
•~
..
8
4
•~
..
5
--
••
..
12
--
•~
27
2
9
*•
--
8
--
* —
37
3
9
4
1
3
3
"
--
11
--
~ ™
7
--
8
3
-.
11
--
--
2
--
--
••
..
8
--
~~
--
9
4
~*
-.
5
--
••
.-
12
--
••
17
--
9
mm
—
10
--
"
18
3
9
4
1
3
3
"
--
11
--
"
7
•-
8
3
Total
PAH* PCBs"
..
2 2
--
_.
2
..
--
..
..
2 2
—
•~ *~
..
4
1 4
— " ~ ~
..
1 1
—
~~ ••
..
3 3
--
*™ • •
23
1
1 9
"™ — —
..
3 3
--
..
59
3
1 9
4
40
3 3
1 3
"
--
3 3
..
..
7
--
1 8
3
HCH 2DDTC
—
2
--
•~
2
--
--
~*
--
2
--
~ m
—
--
4
™ —
--
1
--
~ —
--
3
--
~ "
7
"
9
"
--
3
••
64
--
9
4
53
3
3
--
3
"•
7
""
8
3
.-
2
--
—
2
--
--
••
--
2
•-
"
--
--
4
"
--
1
--
"
--
3
--
"
19
--
9
--
3
""
73
3
9
4
55
3
3
--
3
~ ~
7
~ "
8
3
45
-------
TABLE 8. (Continued)
Area
Sinclair Inlet
Point Pulley
Port Susan
EdMnds
Agate Pa**
Point Madison
Manchester
Point Jefferson
Eagle Harbor
Point Blakely
All Puget Sound
Seafood
Category
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori-
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori-
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori-
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori-
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori-
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori-
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Arsenic
19
12
--
--
..
--
--
--
._
--
--
--
27
6
--
--
4
--
--
--
11
--
--
•-
4
--
--
*-
5
--
--
--
..
8
--
-•
..
1
--
--
147
110
33
7
Cadniua
18
13
--
-•
--
--
--
--
..
--
--
••
25
7
—
--
4
--
--
-•
11
--
•-
••
4
--
--
--
5
—
—
--
..
8
--
•-
..
1
--
--
142
118
33
7
Lead
18
10
—
••
—
—
--
•-
—
--
--
~~
25
7
--
•-
4
--
--
•-
11
—
~
••
4
--
--
-•
5
--
--
-•
..
8
—
••
..
1
--
•-
141
96
33
7
Mercury
4
10
--
••
--
"
—
"
..
—
—
•*
9
2
--
--
4
--
-•
••
11
«
—
-•
4
--
—
--
5
—
--
--
..
8
—
•-
..
1
—
-•
82
93
33
7
Total
PAH* PCBsD
12
2 4
--
••
„
—
—
.. --
1
—
--
~~ ™~
17
7
--
..
4
-.
..
..
11
..
•-
..
4
..
..
--
5
..
..
—
..
8 8
„
..
..
1 1
..
--
185
32 41
5 33
7
HCH 2DDTC
5
2 4
,-
• - _ ~
5 5
--
--
.• - -
5 5
..
--
_ <• • —
10
2
--
-*
4
--
--
•-
10
..
"
..
5
..
..
--
5
..
..
—
..
.-
..
--
..
—
..
--
143 205
19 26
33 33
7 7
* Includes benzo
-------
• Option 2. Use the quantification limit as a sample value in
the exposure assessment and, hence, in the risk characteriza-
tion
• Option 3. Assume a value lower than the quantification limit
(i.e., 0.5 x quantification limit) and use it in the exposure
assessment and risk characterization.
Option 1 results in a loss of useful information, particularly when the
frequency of detection is low. Assuming that most actual values below the
quantification limits are greater than zero, both Options 1 and 2 tend to
overestimate the average concentration. To offset this possible over-
estimation and to retain the available information, values of one-half the
quantification limits were assumed for substances that were not detected
(Option 3). This assumption is often used in public health risk assessments
at Superfund sites (Cirone, P., 2 September 1988, personal communication) to
retain the available information and to offset possible biases in estimates
of average concentration.
Concentration data for the chemicals of concern in various categories
of seafood from all Puget Sound locations (i.e., fish, shellfish, kelp and
Ulva, and nori) are summarized in Table 9. The data summary provided in
Table 9 is based on only those data that met all data quality objectives,
and on the assumption of one-half the quantification limits for those
substances that were not detected. Thus, for some substances the numbers of
samples and ranges of values given in Table 9 may differ substantially in
comparison with the data listing provided in Appendix B, which identifies
actual quantification limits and includes both qualified and unqualified
data. Major limitations in the data in Table 9 are the relatively small
number of macroalgae samples, the absence of PAH data for fishes, and the
negligible (i.e., 0-3 percent) frequency of detection of alpha-HCH. Alpha-
HCH was only detected in fish (chinook salmon) from Commencement Bay,
Elliott Bay and Point-No-Point (see Appendix C and Appendix D).
47
-------
TABLE 9. SUMMARY DATA* FOR CHEMICALS OF CONCERN IN PUGET SOUND
FISH. SHELLFISH, AND MAOtOALGAE
Chemical
Arsenic
Cadmius
Lead
Mercury
DOT, ODE, ODD
alpha- HCH
Carcinogenic
PAH
PCS
Seafood
Category
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
No.
Samples
147
110
33
7
142
118
33
7
141
96
33
7
82
93
33
7
205
26
33
7
143
19
33
7
.
32
5
-
185
41
33
7
Percent
Detected
100
100
100
100
76
100
100
100
50
81
85
57
87
100
48
43
40
69
100
100
3
.
-
-
.
47
-
-
99
83
-
*
Concentration (ug/kg we
Mean
3,441
3,252
2,559
2,279
5.4
219.1
173.2
213.1
16.3
199.3
338.0
76.8
26.6
22.5
1.7
1.0
11.15
1.60
4.03
3.86
0.60
0.05
0.53
0.50
.
61.9
261.7
-
138.2
44.7
10.6
10.0
SE
354
254
380
499
0.6
16.2
19.4
48.6
3.0
33.1
135.7
36.8
4.2
1.6
0.5
0.3
2.24
0.49
0.11
0.14
0.09
0.00
0.03
0.00
.
25.2
62.6
-
17.6
10.2
0.6
0.0
Minimi
190
1,200
340
470
0.5
2.0
46.0
62.0
0.5
1.0
2.5
2.5
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
0.85
0.15
3.00
3.00
0.05
0.05
0.50
0.50
.
2.5
120.0
-
1.8
1.0
10.0
10.0
it wt)b
Maxiaui
20,700
22,100
9,200
3,880
66.0
1,280.0
437.0
394.0
200.0
1.980.0
4,460.0
240.0
260.0
103.0
15.0
3.0
415.00
11.33
7.00
4.00
6.00
0.10
1.50
0.50
.
748.0
480.0
-
2,060.0
230.0
30.0
10.0
95 Percent
Confidence Limitsc
Lower Upper
2.740
2.749
1,785
1,057
4.1
187.0
133.7
94.3
10.4
133.5
61.6
0.0
18.3
19.3
0.8
0.2
6.72
0.60
3.80
3.51
0.42
0.05
0.47
0.50
-
10.6
87.9
-
103.5
24.0
9.4
10.0
4,141
3,756
3,333
3,500
6.6
251.2
212.6
332.0
22.1
265.1
614.3
166.9
34.9
25.6
2.6
1.8
15.57
2.61
4.26
4.21
0.78
0.06
0.59
0.50
-
113.2
435.5
"
172.9
65.5
11.8
10.0
" Only those values that met data quality objectives were used in the data stamery. and in the subsequent
risk characterization. Consequently, the nuaber of saaples and suMwry statistics indicated herein may
differ substantially fro* those based on both qualified and unqualified data, which are simnarized in
Appendix B.
b One-half the quant it at ion limits was assuaad for values that were not detected.
c The 95 percent confidence interval was determined as follows:
Lower confidence I isn't (LCI) * mean - t« ge
Upper confidence tisn't (UCL) * scan * t^gj
where:
tg Q5 /„.•)} * Student's two-tailed t value for alpha = 0.05 and n-1 degrees of freedom.
SE » The standard error of the mean.
48
-------
Based on qualitative comparisons of the 95 percent confidence intervals,
several aspects of the data are noteworthy. Concentrations of arsenic were
approximately the same within all categories of seafood despite extremely
high maximum values observed in some fish and shellfish. Cadmium concentra-
tions were much lower in fish than in other seafood categories. Mercury
concentrations in fish and shellfish were higher than those for macroalgae.
Also, concentrations of PCBs and s DDT were much higher in fish than in
either shellfish or macroalgae. Detailed data summaries by individual
sampling locations are provided in Appendix C for various categories of
seafood and in Appendix D for individual taxa.
Concentrations of chemicals of concern in Puget Sound seafood were
compared with available federal guidelines governing acceptable concentra-
tions of toxic substances in fish and shellfish to determine whether these
guidelines suggested the need for regulatory action. The U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) (1982, 1984) has established tolerances and action
levels that set an upper limit for the unavoidable concentrations of
chemical contaminants in commercial fish and shellfish products that are
sold in interstate commerce. The criteria used by the FDA (21 CFR 109) to
establish tolerance levels are:
• The substance cannot be avoided
• The tolerance level is sufficient for the protection of
public health, taking into account the extent to which the
presence of the substance cannot be avoided and other ways in
which consumers might be affected by the substance
• No technological or other changes are foreseeable in the near
future that would affect the extent to which such substances
are unavoidable.
Criteria for FDA action levels (21 CFR 109) are the same as those for
tolerances, with the exception that there are foreseeable technological or
other changes that would affect the extent to which such substances are
49
-------
unavoidable. In setting tolerances and action levels, FDA takes into
consideration socioeconomic and technological factors to the extent that
such factors are consistent with the protection of public health in the
general population.
The FDA has established tolerances or action levels for three of the
eight chemicals that are of concern in this risk assessment:
• Mercury - 1 mg/kg wet weight (1,000 ug/kg) - Action level for
fish and shellfish
• PCBs - 2 mg/kg wet weight (2,000 ug/kg) - Tolerance level for
fish and shellfish
• S DDT - 5 mg/kg wet weight (5,000 ug/kg) - Action level for
fish only.
Overall, average concentrations of these substances in the various species
and categories of seafood were less than the FDA tolerances or action levels
for all locations in Puget Sound (see Table 9 and Appendices C and D). The
only notable exception to this generalization was the concentration of PCBs
[2.06 mg/kg (2,060 ug/kg) wet weight] in a single sample of English sole
from Elliott Bay. U.S. FDA action levels have not been established for
other chemicals of concern in Puget Sound seafood.
Although the foregoing comparisons with tolerances or action levels for
mercury, PCBs, and s DDT are reassuring, such comparisons do not address a
number of key issues, including:
• Potential health risks associated with substances for which
tolerances or action levels have not been established (i.e.,
arsenic, cadmium, lead, PAH, and alpha-HCH)
• Cumulative health risks associated with multiple chemical
exposure
50
-------
• Health risks for those recreational harvesters whose seafood
consumption rates may be much higher than those of the general
population
• Health risks for recreational harvesters who take a majority
of their seafood from a localized contaminated area rather
than from a "national market basket" representing a range of
locations and environmental conditions.
These and other issues are addressed in the remaining sections of this
report.
Seafood Consumption Rates
Concern over the potential health risks associated with consumption of
seafood prompted several recent studies of catch and consumption patterns
for recreational harvesters in Puget Sound (Pierce et al. 1981; McCallum
1985; Landolt et al. 1985, 1987). These surveys ranged widely in objec-
tives, study design, interview methods, and spatial and temporal coverage of
harvest areas. The following locations and modes of angling were covered by
the various surveys:
• Pierce et al. (1981) - Shore angling and boat angling in
Commencement Bay
• McCallum (1985) - Shore angling in Elliott Bay, Everett
Harbor (Port Gardner), and Sinclair Inlet
• Landolt et al. (1985) - Shore angling in Commencement Bay,
Elliott Bay, Sinclair Inlet, and Edmonds
• Landolt et al. (1987) - Boat angling in Elliott Bay and
Commencement Bay.
51
-------
Each of the surveys were examined as part of this risk assessment, and
although each included information on shellfish harvesting, they focused
primarily on the angling segments of the seafood harvesting community.
Consequently, the information from the various surveys that could be readily
translated into seafood consumption rates was limited to fish and pelagic
shellfish (i.e., market squid) caught by recreational anglers. No surveys
were available on local recreational shellfish consumption.
The results of each of these studies were summarized and reported in
widely ranging formats. Information common to all of the surveys was
reviewed to generate a range of seafood consumption rates characteristic of
recreational anglers in Puget Sound. Because of limitations in the
reporting of the available catch and consumption data, species-specific
seasonal variability in estimated consumption rates was not considered.
Instead, the focus was on an annualized daily consumption rate for all
species combined that could be attributed to various levels of fishing
effort, and which could be used to predict potential risks over a 70 year
lifetime of exposure. The following variables were used to determine
seafood consumption rates:
• Angler fishing effort (E) expressed in units of day/yr
• The proportion of anglers (P) associated with each level of
fishing effort
• The average daily weight (W) of all fish caught during the
survey period expressed in units of g/day
• The edible fraction of fish (F), which ranged from 0.3 to 0.49
depending on the survey and species caught
• The average number of consumers (C) that eat the catch.
A range of average daily consumption rates were calculated using the
equation:
52
-------
x W x F)/(C x 365 day/yr) (1)
where:
ADCi = Average daily consumption rate expressed as g/person/day for the
ith level of fishing effort.
The maximum fish consumption rate generated from these data was 407 g/day
for Commencement Bay anglers who reported a fishing-level-of-effort of 304
days/yr (Pierce et al. 1981). This value is in agreement with the maximum
value (454 g/day) generated in Versar's (1985) analysis of the Commencement
Bay data, but, as indicated below, is an extremely high value representative
of a small fraction of the recreational fishing community.
Statistical analyses were then performed by linear regression of angle
transformed [i.e., arcsin (P)0-5] estimates of the cumulative proportion of
anglers associated with the various levels of fishing effort against the log
transformed estimates of the average daily consumption rate (Figures 4
and 5). Results of these analyses were then used to derive a number of
independent estimates of seafood consumption rates for the 5th, 50th (i.e.,
median), and 95th percentiles of the angling population (Table 10).
The median (i.e., 50th percentile) fish consumption rates for recrea-
tional anglers ranged from 1.9 to 26.1 g/day, with an overall median of
12.3 g/day. Estimates of the 95th percentile of fish consumption rates
ranged from 24.3 to 246 g/day, with a median of 95.1 g/day. Thus, the
overall indication is that less than 5 percent of the recreational anglers
consume more than 95.1 g/day. Based on these results, a consumption rate of
12.3 g/day was used to estimate average exposure, and a consumption rate of
95.1 g/day was used to estimate high exposure to chemically contaminated
fish from Puget Sound.
53
-------
90-
80-
70-
60-
50-
40-
30-
20-
n 10-
t M
a)
.
•
•
Reference: Adapted from Pierce et al. (1981).
I I I I I I T
-100
-95
-75
-50
-25
-5
- 0
2
55
0 90-
BE
80-
70-
60-
50-
40-
30-
20-
10-
0-
0.
b) 9"
• ••
••
* . i*
•
^*
• **
i
Reference: Adapted from Landolt et al. (1987).
I I I I I 1 I
1 1 10 100 1,0
r-100
-95
-75
-50
-25
-5
-0
::
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
H
111
0
OB
UJ
Q.
UJ
P
2
D
0
Figure 4. Estimates of fish consumption rates as a function of cumulative percent
of the angler population for shore and boat anglers surveyed by the
Tacoma-Pierce County Health Department (a), and for boat anglers
surveyed by NOAA (b).
-------
90 -
80-
70-
60-
50-
40-
30-
20-
10 -
0-
90 -
80 -
7n —
r U
(£* 60 -
<^^m>
50 -
HZ
40 -
CO
O 30-
oc
^ 20 —i
10 -
0 — i
90 -.
80-
70 -
60 -
50 -
40 -
30-
20-
10-
0-
a)
•
•
•
*
•
. »
9 *
Reference: Adapted from McCallum (1985).
I 111
b)
8 •
• •
• •
."
Reference: Adapted from Pierce et al. (1981).
I I i I 1 I I
C)
A
•jy-
••*
\ s
*
j *
* . •
.."*
^ •* %•
. Reference: Adapted from LandoHet al. (1985).
I I I I I I
-100
- 95
-75
- 50
-25
- 5
- 0
r- 100 H
-95 g
C
-75 W
Q.
-50 ^J
j™
-25 <
•••
D
-s 5
Of &
O
-100
-95
-75
- 50
-25
-5
-0
0.1 1 10 100 1,000
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
Figure 5. Estimates of fish consumption rates as a function of cumulative percent
of the angler population for shore anglers surveyed by the Washington
Department of Social and Health Services (a), the Tacoma-Pierce County
Health Department (b), and NOAA (c).
55
-------
TABLE 10. ESTIMATED FISH CONSUMPTION RATES (G/DAY) FOR VARIOUS PROPORTIONS
OF URBAN ANGLER POPULATIONS SURVEYED IN PUGET SOUND
Cumulative Percent ilea of
Angler
Population
Shore5
Shore*;
Shore*1
Shore/boat*1
Boat6
Median value^
Anqler Peculation
5
2.8
0.2
0.6
1.3
LI
1.3
50
26.1
1.9
7.1
13.6
11,3
12.3
95
246.2
24.3
78.2
147.1
J^l
95.1
Study
Landolt et al . (1985)
McCallum (1985)
Pierce et al . (1981)
Pierce et al . (1981)
Landolt et al . (1987)
a For example, the McCallum (1985) study indicates that the consumption rate
for 95 percent of the population surveyed is < 24.3 g/day, and that the
average (i.e., 50th percentile) consumption rate is 1.9 g/day.
b Commencement Bay, Elliott Bay, Sinclair Inlet, Edmonds.
c Elliott Bay, Everett Harbor (Port Gardner), Sinclair Inlet.
°* Commencement Bay.
e Elliott Bay and Commencement Bay.
f Median values were used to construct risk graphics.
Reference: Adapted from data presented by Landolt et al. (1985, 1987),
Pierce et al. (1981), and McCallum (1985).
56
-------
There are a number of uncertainties and potential biases associated with
these overall estimates of median consumption rates. Major uncertainties
include variability associated with:
• Different modes of angling activity (boat vs. shore)
• Different subpopulations (and sample sizes) of recreational
anglers
• Different rates of angling success associated with each
survey location or fishery zone
• Different survey methods and periods (i.e., 5 to 13 mo).
Consequently, the overall median values indicated in Table 10 provide only a
general indication of the range of fish consumption rates for Puget Sound
anglers. As indicated in Table 10, higher or lower estimates may be obtained
for specific modes of angling at specific locations. These survey-specific
values may be used in combination with the risk graphics (see Graphical Risk
Characterization below) to estimate health risks for specific modes of
angling activity at the various survey locations cited in Table 10.
Consumption rates specific to Puget Sound were not available for
shellfish or for macroalgae. In developing ambient water quality criteria,
the U.S. EPA (1980) used 0.8 g/day as a national average shellfish consump-
tion rate. Nash (1971) compiled regional (e.g., Pacific coast, middle
Atlantic states, New England states) information on per capita consumption
of fish and shellfish indicating that shellfish consumption rates for the
general population range from 0.6 to 1.9 g/day, with a median value of
1.1 g/day. Hence, a value of 1.1 g/day was used to estimate average
exposure. The value of 1.9 g/day was not used as an estimate of high
shellfish consumption because it only represents approximately 2.7 servings
(assuming 151 g/serving) of shellfish per year (see Graphical Risk Character-
ization below). Consequently, an estimate of the high shellfish consumption
rate was developed using the following assumptions:
57
-------
• There is approximately 0.333 Ib (151 g) per shellfish serving
• An individual may eat 1 serving/wk (i.e., 52 servings/yr).
Based on these assumptions, a consumption rate of 21.5 g/day was used to
estimate high exposure to chemically contaminated shellfish from Puget
Sound.
Uncertainty associated with the average exposure value for shellfish
consumption concerns extrapolating from per capita statistics for regional
or national populations to populations of recreational shellfish harvesters
in the vicinity of a major seafood-producing estuary. Thus, the actual
average rate of consumption for recreational harvesters of shellfish from
Puget Sound may be greater than that estimated here. Uncertainty associated
with the high exposure value for consumption of shellfish concerns the
validity of the assumptions outlined above. Although not substantiated by
recreational catch and consumption statistics, it is entirely reasonable to
assume that some individuals who live in the vicinity of a major maritime
region such as Puget Sound may harvest or purchase shellfish for personal
consumption on a weekly basis.
Average and high exposure estimates for consumption of macroalgae were
based on marketing information developed by a local mariculture facility
specializing in the production of algae of the genus Porphyra, which is
commonly known as nori (Merrill, J-, 8 February 1988, personal communica-
tion). Estimates of average U.S. consumption rates were used to determine
average exposure, and estimates of average consumption rates in Japan were
used to determine high consumption exposure, which may be representative
of ethnic minorities who harvest macroalgae from Puget Sound. For kelp,
the average consumption rate in the U.S. is 0.023 g/day, and that in Japan
is 16.2 g/day. For nori, the average consumption rate in the U.S. is
0.006 g/day, and that in Japan is 4.1 g/day.
58
-------
Dose-Estimation
All risk estimates are based on determination of chemical doses.
Because the consumption rate information described above was based on
averages for all species within a category, dose estimates were only derived
for major categories of seafood (i.e., fish, shellfish, kelp and Ulva, and
nori). The expression used for dose estimation was:
Dij = (Cij x Ij x Ai)/B (2)
where:
- Dose of chemical i in seafood category j (mg/kg body weight/day)
= Concentration of chemical i in seafood category j (mg/kg seafood)
Ij * Ingestion rate for seafood category j (kg seafood/day)
A^ » Absorption coefficient for chemical i (unitless)
B * Standard assumption for average lifetime body weight (70 kg).
Note that Equation 2 is a general expression for dose estimation that can be
derived from average estimates of contaminant concentrations at specific
locations in Puget Sound or on a Puget Sound-wide basis. Aspects of spatial
characterization of risks are discussed below.
Major assumptions used in dose-estimation were:
• Exposure occurs daily over a 70-yr lifetime
• A representative body weight for a lifetime of exposure is
70 kg
• The absorption coefficient is 1 percent for ingested arsenic
and 100 percent for the other chemicals.
As indicated above in the Toxicity Assessment, approximately 1 percent of the
total arsenic in seafood is in the inorganic form. Because the carcinogenic
59
-------
potency factor for arsenic is based on ingestion of inorganic arsenic,
1 percent of the total arsenic concentration was used to estimate risks
associated with seafood consumption. An absorption coefficient of 100 per-
cent was used for mercury and the organic chemicals of concern, because
they are highly assimilative (95-100 percent absorption efficiency). An
absorption coefficient of 100 percent was assumed for cadmium and lead,
because the RfD values for these substances are based on exposure to an
ingested dose rather than an assimilated dose.
The average consumption rates described previously for various
categories of seafood were used to estimate average lifetime doses for the
various chemicals of concern. Uncertainty in dose estimation was determined
to a degree by estimating doses associated with the upper 95 percent
confidence limit of mean concentrations in various seafood categories, and
the high-case estimates for consumption of each category of seafood. Thus,
dose-estimation was based on a range of values representative of average
exposure conditions and high exposure conditions. The assumptions used in
dose estimation and in subsequent risk calculations are outlined in the
following section (Risk Characterization).
RISK CHARACTERIZATION
Dose-response variables summarized in the Dose-Response Assessment
section were used with the dose estimates summarized in the Exposure
Assessment section to characterize potential health risks associated with
chemically contaminated seafood from Puget Sound. The following risk
characterization provides
• A summary of how these variables were used to characterize
risks
• An overview of the range of assumptions associated with the
risk calculations
• A discussion of the results of the risk estimates.
60
-------
Risk Characterization Methods and Assumptions
Potential risks associated with each carcinogen of concern in various
categories of seafood were estimated as the probability of excess cancer
using the equation:
RTJ = 1 - exp(-P1 x Dij) (3)
where:
Risk associated with chemical i in seafood category j
Carcinogenic potency factor for chemical i ( mg/kg/day) -1
Dose of chemical i in seafood category j (mg/kg/day).
Attributes of carcinogenic potency factors and methods of dose estimation
are as described above (see Dose Response Assessment and Exposure Assess-
ment).
Nonprobabilistic hazards associated with ingestion of noncarcinogens in
various seafood categories were expressed as a ratio:
where:
Rl-ji = Risk index for chemical i in seafood category j
Dii = Dose of chemical i in seafood category j (mg/kg/day)
•
= Reference dose for chemical i (mg/kg/day).
Characteristics of the RfD and methods of dose estimation are as described
above.
Finally, potential cumulative health risks associated with exposure to
multiple carcinogenic chemicals or multiple noncarcinogenic chemicals in
61
-------
various categories of seafood were determined by summing the risks for
individual contaminants within a seafood category and then summing the
risks across all seafood categories. Cumulative risks for carcinogens were
calculated using the expression:
5 4
Cumulative Carcinogenic Risk - S S RJ (5)
where:
R^J - The same as that defined above for Equation 3.
Cumulative risks for noncarcinogens were calculated using the expression:
3 4
Cumulative Noncarcinogenic Risk Index Z S RI^j (6)
where:
Rl-ij - The same as that defined above for Equation 4.
Summation of multiple chemical risks across the various categories of
seafood assumes that all individuals in the exposed population eat fish,
shellfish, kelp and Ulva, and nori at the consumption rates described above
in the Exposure Assessment. Depending on individual preferences, this may
or may not be the case. Nevertheless, such an approach provides an
appropriate means of calculating risk based on all routes of exposure.
The cumulative risk estimate for carcinogens provides an indication of
the lifetime probability of excess cancer that may occur through exposure to
one or more substances, each of which may act independently on various
target organs. In general, U.S. EPA decisions concerning individual
lifetime risk estimates in the range of 10'7 to 10"3 are made on a case-by-
62
-------
case basis and are strongly influenced by considerations of the population
risk (Travis et al. 1987, Travis and Haltemer-Frey 1988). Individual risk
levels greater than 10~3 are usually subject to regulatory action, and those
less than 10"^ are rarely subject to regulatory action. Under Superfund,
EPA (1986d) has established a target range of 10'7 to 10~4 for remedial
action alternatives that are designed to mitigate exposure to hazardous
substances.
The cumulative risk index for noncarcinogens assumes simple additivity
of effects and provides a numerical indication of the nearness to acceptable
limits of exposure or the degree to which acceptable exposure limits are
exceeded (U.S. EPA 1986c). A cumulative risk index greater than 1.0
suggests that exposure to an individual substance or all substances
collectively exceeds a generalized level of concern for a common toxico-
logical endpoint or target organ.
The risk characterization equations described above incorporate a
number of assumptions and numerical estimates that were developed in the
Dose-Response and Exposure Assessments. Dose estimates based on mean
chemical concentrations and average consumption rates were used to estimate
average-case risks. Dose estimates based on upper 95 percent confidence
limits of mean chemical concentrations and high consumption rates were used
to estimate high-case risks. A summary of the assumptions, numerical
estimates, and calculations that were used in the risk characterization is
provided in Table 11.
Characterization of Risks
Potential health risks associated with chemicals of concern in Puget
Sound biota are summarized in Table 12 for noncarcinogens and Table 13 for
carcinogens. The values in Table 12 and Table 13 are based on mean chemical
concentrations and upper 95 percent confidence limits for these mean values
in the different categories of seafood averaged over all locations in Puget
Sound (see Figure 3). The risk estimates in Tables 12 and 13 are presented
in four ways:
63
-------
TABLE 11. SUMMARY OF ASSUMPTIONS, NUMERICAL ESTIMATES, AND CALCULATIONS USED FOR CHARACTERIZATION
OF HEALTH RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS IN PUGET SOUND SEAFOOD
Assessment
Stage
Exposure Assessment
Toxicity Assessment
Risk characterization
Numerical Estimates and Calculations
Parameter
Chemical concentration*
(ug/kg wet wt)
Exposure duration (yr)
Body weight (kg)
Gastrointestinal
absorption coefficient
Consumption rates (a/day)
Carcinogenic potency factor
(mg/kg/day)*1
Reference dose (mg/kg/day)
Dose estimation
Carcinogenic risk
Assumptions
Adequate sample sizes,
normal probability
distribution
Lifetime
Average adult male
Arsenic6
Other substances
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp and Ulva
Nori
Arsenic"
PAH*
PCBs*
DDTs*
alpha- HCH*
Cadmium'
Lead*
Mercur/1
Single chemical'
and mediun
Probabilistic method1'"
based on the linearized
multistage model
Average-case
Mean6
values
70
70
0.01
1
12.3
1.1
0.023
0.006
1.5
11.5
4.34
0.34
11.12
0.0003
0.0014
0.0003
O.j -
-------
TABLE 11. (Continued)
* Assures no effect of cooking.
Summarized in Table 6 and Appendix C.
c Assumed proportion of inorganic arsenic to total arsenic in seafood (see text).
d Maximum likelihood estimate based on epidemiological study of exposure via drinking water.
e Upper 95 percent confidence limit based on low dose extrapolation in experimental animals.
* Based on human and animal evidence for kidney accumulation, and an uncertainty factor of 10.
9 Based on incremental increase in blood lead concentrations in human populations.
** Based on hunan epidemiological evidence for central nervous system disorders, and an uncertainty factor of 10.
i
where: D
C
A
dose of chemical i in seafood category j (mg/kg body weight/day)
concentration of chemical i in seafood category j (mg/kg seafood)
ingest ion rate for seafood category j (kg seafood/day)
absorption coefficient for chemical i (unit I ess)
standard assumption for average lifetime body weight (70 kg).
O\ i
en ' Average-case values used in calculation.
k High-case values used in calculation.
1 where: R; : * risk associated with chemical i in seafood category j
P- * potency factory for chemical i (mg/kg/day)
DJ: « dose of chemical i in seafood category j (mg/kg body weight/day).
* Equivalent to RJJ » PjXOjj for risks less than 10"2.
n where: RIj.- • risk index associated with chemical < in seafood category j.
RfOj » reference dose for chemical i
O = dose of chemical < in seafood category (mg/kg body weight/day).
-------
TABLE 12. NONCARCINOGENIC RISK CHARACTERIZATION FOR CHEMICALS OF CONCERN IN PUGET SOUND SEAFOOD
Ot
Reference Ingestion Rate Concentration (ug/kg Met wt)a Noncarcinogen Risk Index**
Dose confidence Aosorption seafood (g/clay) . No. Percent — - —
Chemical (mg/kg/day)c Rating6 Coefficient Category Average" High" Samples Detected Mean SE
Cadmium 0.0003 • 1.0 Fish 12.3 95.1 142
Shellfish 1.1 21.5 118
Kelp/Ulva 0.023 16.2 33
Nori 0.006 4.1 7
Cumulative Risk Index
Lead 0.0014 - 1.0 Fish 12.3 95.1 141
Shellfish 1.1 21.5 96
Kelp/Ulva 0.023 16.2 33
Nori 0.006 4.1 7
Cunulative Risk Index
Mercury 0.0003 2 1.0 Fish 12.3 95.1 82
Shellfish 1.1 21.5 93
Kelp/Ulva 0.023 16.2 33
Nori 0.006 4.1 7
Cumulative Risk Index
Multiple Chemical Exposure
76 5.4 0.6
100 219.1 16.2
100 173.2 19.4
100 213.1 48.6
50 16.3 3.0
81 199.3 33.1
85 338.0 135.7
57 76.8 36.8
87 26.6 4.2
100 22.5 1.6
48 1.7 0.5
43 1 .0 0.3
.
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
UCL8
6.6
251.2
212.6
332.0
22.1
265.1
614.3
166.9
34.9
25.6
2.6
1.8
Cumulative Risk Index
* Data as summarized in Table 9.
b Noncarcinogenic risk index « (estimated dose )/( reference dose),
where estimated dose * [concentration (mg/kg food) x ingestfon rate (kg food/day) x absorption
c Reference dose values (RfD) and confidence ratings from Table 6.
d Ingestion rate assunptions are explained in the exposure assessment and are summarized in Table
8 Upper 95 percent confidence limit (UCL) for mean concentration.
* Based on average ingestion rate and mean contaminant concentration.
8 Based on high ingestion rate and UCL for mean contaminant concentration in seafood.
h Risk estimate for exposure to a single chemical in a single seafood category.
1 emulative risk associated with exposure to a single chemical via multiple seafoods.
1 Cumulative risk associated with multiple chemical exposure via a single seafood category.
Cumulative risk associated with multiple chemical exposure via multiple seafood categories.
coefficient]/ [body weight
11.
(70 kg)] .
n * ** i WIM«
Caser
SxlO*?*
1x10"?
2x10"*
6x10°
IxlO"21
2x10"3
2x10"3
8x10**
5x10"6
4x1 0"3
2x10*f
1x10"f
2x10"*
3x10" '
2x10"2
2x10"2*
1x10"2
3x10"*
6x10°
4x10*2k
** * V*
Case8
3x10*2
3x10"]
2x10*'
6x10'2
5x10"1
2x10"2
6x10*2
1x10";
7x10"3
2x10" 1
2x10" I
3x10*2
2x10"?
4x10"*
2x10" 1
2x10")
3x10"]
3x10"!
7x10"2
9x1 O"1
-------
TABLE 13. CARCINOGENIC BISK CHARACTERIZATION FOR CHEMICALS OF CONCERN IN PUOET SOUND SEAFOOD
potency
Factor6 . Weight of
Chemical (mg/kg/day)1 Evidence0
Arsenic 1.5 A
DDT, DDD, DDE 0.34 B2
alpha- HCH 11.12 B2
Carcinogenic 11.5 82
PAH
PCB 7.7 B2
Absorption Seafood
Coefficient Category
0.01 Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nor)
Cumulative
1 Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Cumulative
1 Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Cumulative
1 Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Cumulative
1 Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Cumulative
Ingestion Rates
Average™ High
12.3
1.1
0.023
0.006
Risk
12.3
1.1
0.023
0.006
Risk
12.3
1.1
0.023
0.006
Risk
12.3
1.1
0.023
0.006
Risk
12.3
1.1
0.023
0.006
Risk
95
21
16
4
95
21
16
4
95
21
16
4
95
21
16
4
95
21
16
4
.1
.5
.2
.1
.1
.5
.2
.1
.1
.5
.2
.1
.1
.5
.2
.1
.1
.5
.2
.1
No.
Samples
147
110
33
7
205
26
33
7
143
19
33
7
32
5
-
185
41
33
7
Percent
Detectec
100
100
100
100
40
69
100
100
3
-
m
47
-
•
99
83
-
-
Multiple Chemical Exposure
Concentration (ug/kg wet wt)'
i Mean
3,441
3,252
2,559
2,279
11.15
1.60
4.03
3.86
0.60
0.05
0.53
0.50
61.9
261.7
-
138.2
44.7
10.6
10.0
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Mori
Cumulative
SE
354
254
380
499
2.24
0.49
0.11
0.14
0.09
0.00
0.03
0.00
25.2
62.6
-
17.6
10.2
0.6
0.0
Risk
UCL*
4,141
3,756
3,333
3.500
15.57
2.61
4.26
4.21
0.78
0.06
0.59
0.50
113.2
435.5
172.9
65.5
11.8
10.0
1 Carcinogenic Risk.**
Probable High
Case Case"
9X10'6/1
8x10";
1x10"!
3x10"9
IxlO"51
7x10"?
9x10 '
5x10 S
1x10 10
7x10"7
uio;y
9x10 {
2x10"*
SxlO"10
1x10"6
1x10'5
1x10"6
-
IxlO"5
2x10"*
5x10-8
-O
7x10 '
2x10"*
2x10"**
2x10"*
1X10B
1x10"8
2x10-"
8x10"*
2x10"*
1x10"*
3x10'6
IxlO"4
7x10"'
3x10";
3x10";
8x10"8
8x10"6
1x10;*
2x10"![
2x10"?
3x10*7
1x10"5
4x10'4
IxlO"3
-
2x10'3
2x10"3
2x10"*
2x10'*
5x10'6
2x10'3
2x10'3
6x10'*
1x10";?
8x10'6
4x10'3
• Data as sunmarized in Table 9.
b Carcinogenic risk = 1- exp[-(potency factor)x(estimated dose)],
where estimated dose = [concentration (ing/kg food) x ingestion rate (kg food/day) x absorption coefficient]/[body weight (70 kg)].
c Potency factors and weight of evidence ratings from Table 6.
^ Ingestion rate assumptions are explained in the exposure assessment and are sunmarized in Table 11.
6 Upper 95 percent confidence limit (UCL) for mean concentration.
f Based on average ingestion rate and mean contaminant concentration.
9 Based on high ingestion rate and UCL for mean contaminant concentration in seafood.
*? Risk estimate for exposure to a single chemical in a single seafood category.
\ Cumulative risk associated with exposure to a single chemical via multiple seafoods. •
' Cumulative risk associated with multiple chemical exposure via a single seafood category.
k Cumulative risk associated with multiple chemical exposure via multiple seafood categories.
-------
• Individual media and chemicals - risks associated with
exposure to individual chemicals in a single seafood category
• Multiple media - cumulative risks associated with exposure to
individual chemicals via all categories of seafood
• Multiple chemicals - cumulative risks associated with
exposure to multiple chemicals in a single category of seafood
• Multiple chemicals and multiple media - cumulative risks
associated with multiple chemicals via all categories of
seafood.
As indicated above (see Overview of the Risk Assessment Process), cumulative
risk estimates must be regarded as tentative because technological considera-
tions preclude analyzing seafood samples for all potentially toxic chemicals.
Additional limitations to cumulative risk estimates concern the assumption
of additivity. Some substances in combination may act antagonistically
(i.e., less than additive) or synergistically (i.e., greater than additive).
However, the information and methods needed to predict antagonistic or
synergistic interactions are not available.
Noncarcinogenic risk index values for cumulative exposure to all three
chemicals via consumption of all categories of seafood ranged from 0.04 for
average exposure conditions to 0.9 for high exposure conditions. Risk index
values for individual noncarcinogens were typically low and ranged from less
than 0.001 for all three substances (i.e., cadmium, lead and mercury) in
kelp and nori to 0.3 for cadmium in shellfish.
Carcinogenic risks for cumulative exposure to arsenic and the four
organic chemicals of concern ranged from 2xlO"4 for average exposure
conditions to 4xlO'3 for high exposure conditions. These relatively high
cumulative carcinogen risk levels were driven primarily by potential exposure
to PCBs in fish from specific locations in Puget Sound (Commencement Bay,
68
-------
Elliott Bay, Manchester, and Sinclair Inlet). PCBs in fish from these
areas accounted for most of the risk, although arsenic in fish and PCB in
squid from Commencement Bay were contributing factors.
It was originally hoped that estimation of risks for specific locations
in Puget Sound, and comparison of risks among areas would be part of this
evaluation. However, a number of uncertainties compromised our ability to
compare risks among locations with any confidence. Differences in the
number of samples and types of seafood categories available for each area
further limited our ability to develop meaningful estimates of site specific
risks that could be compared among locations. Hence, it was determined by
the sponsoring agency that uncertainties associated with the database
precluded a meaningful evaluation of this sort. Nevertheless, summaries of
contaminant concentrations and associated health risks for various seafood
categories and locations in Puget Sound are presented in Appendix C to be
used only at the discretion of the reader. The risk estimates in Appendix C
provide only a tentative indication of site-specific problems associated
with chemically contaminated seafood. Because of disparities in species
sampled and total numbers of samples from each location, the information in
Appendix C should only be used to assess the amount of available site-
specific information, and to determine whether additional information is
needed for a comprehensive risk assessment. Additional uncertainties and
limitations for risk comparisons among individual locations in Puget Sound
are described below.
A major uncertainty in characterizing health risks for specific
locations in Puget Sound concerns the mobility of the various organisms that
comprise the categories of seafood. The various species of bivalve shellfish
and macroalgae are immobile benthic-dwelling or attached organisms. Thus,
contaminant concentrations and associated health risks in bivalve shellfish
and macroalgae are representative of the specific locations where they were
collected. However, squid and the various species of pelagic, bottom-
feeding, or bottom-dwelling fishes (see Table 2) are highly mobile and often
•igratory. Some species of bottom-dwelling fishes (e.g., English sole) may
be seasonal residents in a particular nearshore location, whereas highly
69
-------
migratory pelagic species (e.g., salmon) may only be transient residents in
a particular nearshore location. Thus, the degree to which contaminant
concentrations in fishes are actually representative of the locations from
which they were caught depends on species-specific patterns of mobility and
migration.
Additional uncertainty in risk estimates for specific locations in
Puget Sound concerns species-specific differences in contaminant bioaccumu-
lation, particularly for PCBs in fishes. Bioaccumulation is the overall
process of biological uptake and retention of chemical contaminants obtained
from food, water, contact with sediments, or any combination of exposure
pathways. Species-specific factors that affect bioaccumulation of a
substance are habitat, feeding preferences, and physiological mechanisms of
chemical uptake, retention, and elimination. PCB concentrations in fishes
sampled at three or more locations in Puget Sound are shown in Figure 6.
Although the range of PCB concentrations overlap considerably among species,
sound-wide averages indicate that PCB concentrations in bottom-dwelling or
bottom-feeding fishes (e.g., English sole, Pacific cod, starry flounder) are
higher than those in pelagic fishes (e.g., Pacific hake, rockfish, chinook
salmon). This is an important consideration for risk interpretation because
the same species were not sampled at each location in Puget Sound. For
example, the high cumulative carcinogenic risk estimate for Manchester is
based primarily on the concentration of PCBs in the only species of fish
(Pacific cod) sampled in that area. With the exception of Sinclair Inlet,
concentrations of PCBs in Pacific cod from other locations in Puget Sound
were generally comparable to those at Manchester (see Table D-6 in
Appendix 0). High risks that were attributed to PCBs concentrations in
fishes from other areas were based on a wider representation of species,
habitats, and trophic groups. For example, representative species of
pelagic, bottom-feeding, and bottom-dwelling fishes were sampled at
Commencement Bay and Elliott Bay.
In summary, potential health risks associated with noncarcinogenic
substances were within acceptable levels (i.e., risk index values were less
than 1) on a Puget Sound-wide basis and for individual locations within Puget
70
-------
500 —
400 —
f
D)
1
in
CD
O
Q.
300 —
200 —
100 —
(N)
(6)
Elliott Bay
(6)
Manchester
(3)
Sinclair
Inlet
Sinclair
Inlet
Port Susan
Everett
Harbor
Elliott
Bay
Point
Jefferson
(5)
Number of Sample Locations
Maximum Location
Puget Sound Mean
Minimum Location
Commencement
Bay
Elliott Bay
Edmonds
Anacortes
ENGLISH
SOLE
PACIFIC
COD
STARRY
FLOUNDER
PACIFIC
HAKE
CHINOOK
SALMON
ROCKFISH
Figure 6. Range of average PCB concentrations for fishes sampled from three or more
locations in Puget Sound.
-------
Sound. However, potential health risks associated with carcinogenic
substances were substantially elevated at some locations in Puget Sound,
which resulted in high sound-wide risk estimates. These risk estimates are
based on assumptions of average-case and high-case consumption rates for
various categories of seafood. Hence, potential health risks associated
with Puget Sound seafood are highly dependent on site-specific contaminant
concentrations in various species and categories of seafood, and on actual
consumption rates that may vary enormously among individual consumers.
72
-------
COMPARISONS OF CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS
WITH LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF PUGET SOUND
To place the foregoing health risk assessment into a national perspec-
tive, contaminant concentrations and associated health risks in Puget Sound
biota were compared with those in biota from outside of Puget Sound. The
health risk assessment indicated that risks associated with the noncarcino-
genic chemicals of concern were within acceptable levels (i.e., <1).
Consequently, comparisons with contaminant concentrations in biota located
outside of Puget Sound were limited to the carcinogenic chemicals of concern
{i.e., arsenic, carcinogenic PAH, PCB, alpha-HCH, and 2 DOT).
In developing monitoring guidance for contaminant bioaccumulation, the
U.S. EPA sponsored an extensive review of available bioaccumulation data for
a wide number of marine fishes and shellfish from U.S. coastal and terri-
torial waters (Tetra Tech 1987). The review recommended 7 species of
fishes and 11 species of shellfish for bioaccumulation monitoring. In
general, the recommended target species consisted of large bottom-dwelling
or bottom-feeding species that are:
• Widely distributed within a geographic region
• Regionally abundant
• Economically important to commercial or recreational
fisheries.
Data on chemical concentrations of priority pollutants in the target species
were then compiled, evaluated, and summarized from 59 reports and journal
articles published between 1974 and 1985. To ensure meaningful high-quality
information, only those data that were in compliance with accepted practices
of sample identification, sample handling and processing, chemical analysis,
73
-------
QA/QC procedures, and peer review were summarized. A total of 34 data sets
were accepted for inclusion in the bioaccumulation summary. These data were
compiled by study and then sorted by species, tissue, and general sampling
area. The data were then classified into two general kinds of sampling
areas: 1) areas near known sources of contamination, and 2) areas removed
from known sources of contamination. This classification scheme indicated a
general lack of substantial differences in tissue contaminant concentrations
between areas near and removed from known contaminant sources, which was
attributed to:
• Subjective classification of sites by the original authors or
by the reviewers
• A wide range of reference conditions represented by samples
collected from a broad geographic area
• Small numbers of samples
• Movement of mobile organisms.
Given these limitations, it was decided to use the entire unclassified data
set presented in the appendixes of the bioaccumulation review for comparisons
with the Puget Sound data used in this risk assessment. In this way
comparisons could be made entirely on the basis of the range of actual
contaminant concentrations, and would not be encumbered by arbitrary or
subjective classification schemes.
In conclusion, although only a selected number of target species were
considered in the bioaccumulation review, it was based on high quality
information that is generally comparable to that used for the risk assessment
of chemically contaminated seafood in Puget Sound (see Compilation and
Review of Puget Sound Data). Hence, the following comparisons with
locations outside of Puget Sound are based primarily on the U.S. EPA-
sponsored review (Tetra Tech 1987) of bioaccumulation data in selected
species that are representative of marine biota from coastal regions
74
-------
throughout the U.S. The major limitation in the use of these data for
comparisons with Puget Sound biota concerns the habitats in which they
typically reside. Most of the target species included in the bioaccumulation
review are benthic organisms, whereas the species included in this risk
assessment are representative of a wide range of benthic, bottom-dwelling,
bottom-feeding, or pelagic habitats.
Chemical concentration data for carcinogens of concern were available
for fishes and shellfish from coastal and offshore areas ranging from Nova
Scotia to Virginia on the Atlantic coast, and from Washington to Oregon on
the Pacific coast. These data are representative of a range of chemical
concentrations in biota from relatively clean sites (e.g., Bodega Head, CA),
and from areas of known contamination (e.g., Raritan Bay, NY). Data for
carcinogens of concern in macroalgae outside of Puget Sound were not
available for comparison. Average concentration values for locations
outside of Puget Sound are listed by seafood category, species, and location
in Appendix E.
Comparisons with contaminant concentrations in Puget Sound biota are
summarized in Table 14. For each chemical, overall average concentrations
for all locations as well as the range of average values from various
locations are summarized by seafood category (i.e., fish and shellfish).
These data indicate that arsenic in Puget Sound shellfish is generally
elevated in comparison with other regions. Average arsenic concentration in
shellfish from Elliott Bay is approximately three times greater than the
maximum observed for locations outside of Puget Sound. Arsenic concentra-
tions in fish from locations outside of Puget Sound were not available for
comparison. Average concentrations of carcinogenic PAH in Puget Sound
shellfish are approximately 6 times as high as the overall average for other
locations. The maximum PAH concentration in Puget Sound shellfish was found
at Eagle Harbor. Only a single location (Yaquina Bay, OR) from outside Puget
Sound approached this concentration (156 ug/kg, see Appendix E). Data for
PAH in fish from Puget Sound were not available for comparison. However, it
is reasonable to expect that PAH concentrations in fishes from Puget Sound
should be less than those for shellfish. In general, PAH are more rapidly
75
-------
TABLE 14. COMPARISONS OF CONCENTRATIONS (U9/kg, UET WEIGHT) OF CARCINOGENS OF CONCERN IN
FISH AND SHELLFISH FROM PUGET SOUND WITH THOSE FROM LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF PUGET SOUND
Outside
Seafood Grand
Chcarical Category Mean
Arsenic Fish
Shellfish 1,871
Carcinogenic Fish 2.4
PM Shellfish 11.0
PCBs Fish 306
Shellfish 73.0
aipha-HCH Fish
Shellfish 1.3
DOT Fish 1,624
Shellfish 88
" Suaaarized fro* data fraa Appendix E.
* SuMJaarized from data in Appendix C.
c Sinclair Inlet, UA.
d Hid- Atlantic coast.
'Elliott Bay, UA.
* Raritan Bay, NY.
* Yaouina Bay, OR.
h Eagle Harbor, UA.
1 Santa Monica Bay. CA.
' Manchester, UA.
k Net^ort Harbor, CA.
CoaMneeacnt Bay, UA.
* Point No Point, UA.
0 Dash Point. UA.
P Paloa Verde* Shelf. CA.
1 Elkhorn, CA.
of Puget Sound9
Range of Means
Miniaui MaxiM
1,100 2.995d
1.9 2.8f
0.2 1569
19.6 1,750*
0.9 886*
0.3 8.2"
5.8 14,846*
0.2 888*1
Within Puget Sooner
Grand Range of Means
Mean Minimal Maximum
3.441 474 6.602C
3,252 1,820 9,667*
61.9 3.2 m.
-------
•etabolized, transformed, and eliminated by fishes than by shellfish. In
contrast to these substances, concentrations of chlorinated carcinogens of
concern (i.e., PCB, alpha-HCH, and s DDT) in Puget Sound fish and shellfish
were less than those in locations outside of Puget Sound. These trends
presumably reflect the lower use and production of these chemicals in the
Puget Sound area (Matta et al. 1986).
Because most of the data available from the bioaccumulation review
(Tetra Tech 1987) consist of mean or median chemical concentrations, the
following risk comparisons are based on average values from the Puget Sound
data. To estimate a range of potential health risks associated with
carcinogens of concern in other regions, the contaminant concentration data
for locations outside of Puget Sound were combined with exposure assumptions
for Puget Sound (see Exposure Assessment) and risk estimates were calculated
as for risks associated with Puget Sound seafood. These risk estimates for
regions outside of Puget Sound were derived for comparative purposes only.
Risk estimates for other regions may vary from those calculated here because
of regional differences in exposure conditions (e.g., Belton et al. 1986).
Comparisons based on these estimated risk levels are summarized in
Table 15 and shown graphically in Figure 7. Although mean concentrations of
carcinogenic chemicals of concern in fish and shellfish from Puget Sound
differed in some instances from those in fish and shellfish from other
regions, these differences did not always result in substantially different
risk estimates because the significance of risk levels is typically judged
on a logarithmic (i.e., order-of-magnitude) scale.
For shellfish, average-case risk levels were less than or equal to 10"^
for all substances both within and outside of Puget sound. However, high-
case risk levels for individual locations exceeded EPA's regulatory target
range of 10~7 to 10"4 for PAH and PCBs both within and outside of Puget
Sound. In general, both average-case and high-case risk estimates for PCBs,
alpha-HCH, and 2 DDT in shellfish from Puget Sound were either comparable to
or substantially (i.e., an order-of-magnitude) less than those in shellfish
from outside of Puget Sound. Although risk levels associated with arsenic
77
-------
TABLE IS. RISK COMPARISONS WITH LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF PUGET SOUND BASED
ON AVERAGE CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS* IN FISH AND SHELLFISH
CO
Carcinogenic Risk Levels'*
Outside of Puget Sound Within Puget Sound
All
All
Chemical
Arsenic
Carcinogenic
PAH
PCBs
alpha-HCH
ODT
(mg/kg/d)'1
1.5
11.5
7.7
11.12
0.34
Coefficient
0.01
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Category
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
\yf VMi
Average
12.3
1.1
12.3
1.1
12.3
1.1
12.3
1.1
12.3
1.1
j'
High
95.1
21.5
95.1
21.5
95.1
21.5
95.1
21.5
95.1
21.5
n\ \
Areas6
..
4x10'7
5x10'*
2x10'*
4x10'*
9x10"*
2x10'7
1x10'*
5x10"7
•**« i
Minimum*5
3x10"7
4x10"*
4x10"B
3x10'?.
IxlO"7
..
5x10"8
3x10'7
1x109
Maximum*1'*
..
1x10"5
4x10"*
6x10"*
2x10'|
2x10"3
..
3x10'*
7x10"*
9x10"5
*i » »
Areas0
9x10"*
8x10" '
m _
1x10'*
2x10"*
5x10"*
1x10"*
9x10"9
7xio;J
9x109
Minimum0
1x10"*
4x10" 7
mm
6x10"7
2x10'*
IxlO'7
IxlO'7
9x10"9
5x10"?D
8x10 10
Maximum*1'*
1x10"*
4x10"s
/
6x10"*
3x10"'
4x10"*
2x10"*
ZxlO"7
1x10"*
6x10"7
* Risk estimates are based on concentration data presented in Table 14.
b Carcinogenic risk » 1 - exp[-(potency factor)x(dose)l, where:
dose • [concentration (mg/kg food) x Ingest ion rate (kg food/day) x absorption coefficient]/[body weight (70 kg)].
c Based on average ingestlon rates for fish and shellfish.
d Based on high investion rates for fish and shellfish.
* Locations for maximum risk estimates are the same as those identified in Table 14 for maximum concentrations.
-------
CO
o
z
o
UJ
o
x
ID
10-1 -i
10 - -
10 "J H
10 •* H
10 -J
««-6
10 -7 J
Fish
10-2 -,
10-3 -
10-4 _
10-5
10-6 J
10
10
10
-7 _
-8
10-9 I
10-10 -I
O
I
•£
O
Q
O
ARSENIC
PAH
PCBs alpha-HCH
Shellfish
DDTs
T
11
I
I i
ARSENIC
PAH
PCBs alpha-HCH
i I
DDTs
LEGEND
WITHIN PUGET SOUND OUTSIDE PUGET SOUND
<
' MAXIMUM
i AVERAGE (
. MINIMUM
' MAXIMUM
) AVERAGE
. MINIMUM
a Absence of data may be an artifact of the studies selected tor the risk assessment.
Data may be available from other studies.
Figure 7. Comparison of the ranges of risk estimates for carcinogenic
chemicals of concern in Puget Sound fish and shellfish with
those in fish and shellfish from locations outside of Puget Sound.
79
-------
were within EPA's regulatory target range, average-case and high-case values
for shellfish in Puget Sound were greater than those for shellfish from
locations from outside of Puget Sound. For PAH in shellfish, average-case
risks within Puget Sound were substantially higher than those outside Puget
Sound.
For PCBs in fish, average-case and high-case risk levels exceeded
EPA's regulatory target range of 10"7 to 10~4 both inside and outside of
Puget Sound. Average-case risks for PCBs in fish were approximately the
same (2xlO'4 vs. 4xlO'4) within and outside Puget Sound. However, the
high-case risk level for individual locations within Puget Sound was
substantially less than that for locations outside of Puget Sound. Both
average-case and high-case risk levels associated with z DOT in fish from
Puget Sound were less than those for fish from locations outside of Puget
Sound. In Puget Sound, risk levels associated with X DDT in fish were
approximately 10"6 for average exposure conditions, and were approximately
10~5 for high exposure conditions. In contrast, risks associated with s DOT
exposure to fish from locations outside of Puget Sound ranged from 10~4 for
average exposure conditions to approximately 10"2 for high exposure condi-
tions.
80
-------
GRAPHICAL RISK CHARACTERIZATION
As indicated above (see Exposure Assessment), existing data on
contaminant bioaccumulation are fragmentary for some species and locations
in Puget Sound. Thus, a secondary objective of this report was to develop a
tool that would give health agencies and the public a means to easily
estimate potential health risks associated with chemicals in Puget Sound
seafood as additional data becomes available in the future.
To characterize the range of variation in potential health risks
associated with chemical contaminants in Puget Sound seafood, graphs of
potential health risks were plotted as a function of a wide range of
possible contaminant concentrations and consumption rates for each chemical
of concern (Figures 8-15). These graphs allow estimation of potential
health risks associated with chemicals of concern in Puget Sound seafood for
a range of seafood types, possible consumption rates and locations. To
assist in carcinogenic risk interpretation, risk levels associated with
naturally occurring contaminants in food (i.e., aflatoxin B in peanut butter
and PAH in charcoal broiled steaks), or anthropogenic contaminants in
drinking water (i.e., trichloroethylene) are indicated by horizontal dashed
lines. Additional examples of cancer risks from common carcinogens are
shown in Table 16.
Using the methods and assumptions outlined above, potential health
risks were plotted for five consumption rates (see Exposure Assessment):
• Average daily consumption of nori (0.006 g/day)
• Average daily consumption of kelp and Ulva (0.023 g/day)
• Average daily consumption of shellfish (1.1 g/day)
81
-------
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
/J,
V
DC
UJ
o
<
o
UJ
PEANUT BUTTER
(AFLATOXINB)3
CHARCOAL BROILED STEAK
(BENZO(A)PYRENE)b
10
7_
/* > * /> t f pr / f f// / //, t*/rfr -j
1 1 1 T
0.000001 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1
1
1
1
1
10 100 1000 10,000 100.000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight)'
* 1mg/Kg wet weight « 1 ppm
DRINKING WATER
(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)c
a Four tablespoons per day
b 100 steaks per year
c 2 L per day at the U.S. EPA limit (0.005 mg/L)
Figure 8. Graphical risk characterization for arsenic in seafood.
-------
10-2
10
CARCINOGENIC
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
fJJ A
\ \ \ \ r r
0.000001 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1
i i i i i i
1 10 100 1000 10,000 100.000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wat weight)'
* 1 mg/kg wet weight = 1 ppm
a Four tablespoons per day
b 100 steaks per year
c 2 L per day at the U.S. EPA limit (0.005 mg/L)
PEANUT BUTTER
(AFLATOXIN B) a
CHARCOAL BROILED STEAK
IBENZO(A)PYRENE) b
DRINKING WATER
(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) c
Figure 9. Graphical risk characterization for carcinogenic PAH in seafood.
-------
10'Z T|
DC 10~3
£
O 10"*
S
iu to-8
fc ,0-e-j
10-7-1^
PCBs
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
4 > V -4^ 4 4 _ dt._t.. J S*f J ^ J £
I \ 1 \ 1 1 1 1 1 1—I 1
0.000001 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10,000 100,000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight)*
* 1 mg/kg wet weight « 1 ppm
a Four tablespoons per day
b 100 steaks per year
c 2 L per day at the U.S. EPA limit (0.005 mg/L)
PEANUT BUTTER
(AFLATOXIN B) a
CHARCOAL BROILED STEAK
[BENZO(A)PYRENE]b
DRINKING WATER
(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) c
Figure 10. Graphical risk characterization for PCBs in seafood.
-------
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
1000 100 10 1 0.1 001 0001
10
I I I I I • I I
0 000001 0 00001 0.0001 0 001 0.01 0.1 1
I I I I I
10 100 1000 10.000 100.000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight)'
* 1 mg/kg wet weight = 1 ppm
a Four tablespoons per day
b 100 steaks per year
c 2 L per day al the U.S. EPA limit (0.005 mg/L)
PEANUT BUTTER
(AFLATOXIN B) a
CHARCOAL BROILED STEAK
(BENZO(A)PYRENE) b
DRINKING WATER
(TRICHLOROETHYLENE) c
Figure 11. Graphical risk characterization for alpha-HCH in seafood.
-------
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
10 2 -v
Q- 10 3-5
cc
111
f \ A
Uj 105-*
u.
10 6
DDT
1000 100
&
I \ I ] \ I—I—I—I—I—I—I
0.000001 0.00001 0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10.000 100.000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight)'
• 1 mg/kg wet weight« 1 ppm
a Four tablespoons per day
b 100 steaks per year
c 2 L per day at the U.S. EPA limit (0.005 mg/L)
PEANUT BUTTER
(AFLATOXIN B)a
CHARCOAL BROILED STEAK
lBENZO(A)PYRENE|b
DRINKING WATER
(TRICHLOROETHYLENE)c
Figure 12. Graphical risk characterization for DDT, ODD, and DDE in seafood.
-------
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
100 -q
5
o
z 10
DC
O
UJ 1 -
O
z
o
DC
o 0.1
o
o.oi -
CADMIUM
0.0001 0.001
I
0.01
1
0.1
i r i i i
10 100 1000 10,000 100,000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight) •
* 1 mg/kg wet weight = 1 ppm
Figure 13. Graphical risk characterization for cadmium in seafood.
-------
100 -q
IS
o
10 -:
Ul
1 -
5
S
O 0.1
I
0.01 ->
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
LEAD
i.. . i., ,
JA A A Al I / 4i I /
7
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10.000 100.000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight) •
* 1 mg/kg wet weight = 1 ppm
Figure 14. Graphical risk characterization for lead in seafood.
-------
100 -q
O
Z 10
oc
o
Ul 1
o
o
oc
O 0.1
o
0.01 -
MERCURY
CONSUMPTION RATE (g/day)
1000 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
AA A IA M A lit t In t L LA A /it A J
0.0001 0.001 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 10.000 100,000
CONCENTRATION (mg/kg wet weight) •
* 1 mg/kg wet weight = 1 ppm
Figure 15. Graphical risk characterization for mercury in seafood.
-------
TABLE 16. EXAMPLES OF CANCER RISKS FROM COMMON CARCINOGENS
Diet soda (saccharin) - 12.5 oz/day
Average saccharin consumption
Peanut butter (aflatoxins) - 4 tbsp/day
Milk (aflatoxins) - 1 pt/day
Miami/New Orleans drinking water - 2 L/day
Charcoal broiled steak (PAH) - 100/year
Average smoker (PAH)b
Person sharing room with smoker
Average
Lifetime
Riska
7xl(T4
IxlO'4
6xl(T4
IxlO'4
7xlO-5
7xl(T5
8xlO-2
7xlO'4
Average
Annual
Risk
IxlO'5
ZxlO'5
SxlO'5
2xlO'6
IxlO'6
IxlO'6
1.2xlO'3
IxlO'5
a Average lifetime risks were calculated from average annual risks during
preparation of this report assuming a lifetime of 70 yr.
b Risk estimate based on human data.
Reference: Crouch and Wilson (1984) and Allman (1985).
90
-------
• Average daily consumption of fish (12.3 g/day)
• Maximum daily consumption of fish (400 g/day).
The lines plotted for these consumption rates are only intended as examples.
A scale is provided on each graph so that health risks can be estimated for
any consumption rate in the range of 0.001 to 1,000 g/day. The major tick
narks on this scale are spaced at order-of-magnitude intervals (e.g.,
1 g/day, 10 g/day, 100 g/day etc.). The minor tick marks are spaced at
quartile intervals (e.g., 2.5 g/day, 5.0 g/day, and 7.5 g/day). This scale
allows each graph to be used like a nomograph for any seafood category and
consumption rate. For example, risks associated with a fish consumption
rate of 95.1 g/day can be estimated by placing a straight-edged ruler
parallel to the existing lines, and drawing a line that intersects the
consumption rate scale between the major tick mark indicating a consumption
rate of 100 g/day and the minor tick mark indicating a consumption rate of
75 g/day.
Concentrations of chemicals of concern in various categories or species
of seafood are summarized in Table 9 on a sound-wide basis and in Appen-
dices C and D for specific locations in Puget Sound. Using these or other
data and the risk graphs (Figures 8-15), potential health risks associated
with chemicals of concern in Puget Sound seafood may be estimated for a
range of possible consumption rates and locations. For example, the average
concentration of PCBs in English sole from Everett Harbor is 26 ug/kg
(0.026 mg/kg) (Appendix D, Table D-6). Depending on the consumption rate
selected, the estimated carcinogenic risks associated with lifetime exposure
to PCBs in English sole from Everett Harbor ranges from 10'7 to 2xlO'3
(estimated using Figure 10).
For most individuals, consumption rates expressed in units of g/day are
an abstract representation of the number of servings or meals consumed
annually. To provide perspective on use and interpretation of the various
graphs, consumption rates for various categories of seafood were converted
to numbers of servings per year using the following assumptions:
91
-------
• 151 g/serving (0.333 Ib/serving) for fish and shellfish
• 21.4 g/serving for nori
• 56.8 g/serving for kelp.
Servings for nori and kelp are based on portions in an average meal in Japan
(Merrill, J., 8 February 1988, personal communication). The seafood
consumption rates used in the Exposure Assessment section of this report
were converted to numbers of servings per year as summarized in Table 17.
The relationship between the number of servings per year and consumption
rate is shown in Figure 16. For example, individuals that eat about
30 servings/yr of fish have a corresponding consumption rate of 12.3 g/day,
which is the median estimate used in the various graphs.
92
-------
TABLE 17. SUMMARY OF CONSUMPTION PATTERNS
Consumotion Pattern
Seafood
Category
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp
Nori
Serving Size
[g (ib)]
151.0 (0.333)
151.0 (0.333)
151.0 (0.333)
151.0 (0.333)
151.0 (0.333)
151.0 (0.333)
151.0 (0.333)
56.8 (0.125)
56.8 (0.125)
21.4 (0.047)
21.4 (0.047)
Relative
Consumption
Low
Average
High
Maximum
Low
Average
High
Average
High
Average
High
g (lb)/day
1.3 (0.003)
12.3 (0.027)
95.1 (0.209)
400.0 (0.882)
0.6 (0.001)
1.1 (0.002)
21.5 (0.047)
0.023 (0.00005)
16.2 (0.036)
0.006 (0.000013)
4.1 (0.009)
Servings/yr^
3.1
30
230
967
1.5
2.7
52
0.15
104
0.10
70
M54 g/lb.
& Example for calculation:
Fish: 12.3 q
day
1 serving
151.0 g
365 day
29.2 servings/yr
93
-------
1000
100 -
$
3 10
UJ
cc
Z 1-i
o
I
g 0.1-.
8
0.01 -.
0.001
til i .A. .1 _L
0.1
FISH MAXIMUM IN PUGET SOUND
•FISH 95TH PERCENTILE IN PUGET SOUND
•FISH MEDIAN IN PUGET SOUND
•SHELLFISH
AVERAGE
IN U.S.
KELP AVERAGE IN US
NORI AVERAGE IN U.S.
FISH & SHELLFISH
KELP
NORI
i i i i i
TT|-
10
I I 11 l(—
100
1000
SEAFOOD SERVINGS (per year)
Figure 16. Consumption rate as a function of the number of servings per year of fish and
shellfish, kelp and Ulva, and nori.
-------
CONCLUSIONS
In summary, potential health risks associated with consumption of
chemically contaminated seafood from Puget Sound are primarily attributable
to PCB concentrations in fishes and the additive contributions of other
substances in other categories of seafood. For consumption of seafood from
Puget Sound, potential health risks, exclusive of the contribution of PCB,
are within the generally acceptable range of 10'6 to 10'5. However, with
the inclusion of PCB-contaminated fish, the potential cumulative health
risks associated with the consumption of chemically contaminated seafood may
exceed 10"* for certain locations in Puget Sound. These elevated risk
levels do not imply the existence of unique or pervasive chemical contamina-
tion in Puget Sound biota, but serve to indicate that portions of Puget
Sound, like other U.S. coastal areas, are subject to the legacy of past
uses and management of potentially toxic chemicals. In general, PCB
contamination in fish is a long-recognized, ubiquitous and persistent
problem in various regions of the U.S. and in other industrialized nations
(Landrigan 1980; Belton et al. 1986; Swain 1988; Friberg 1988).
Finally, it should also be recognized that the method of risk estimation
used herein provides generally conservative estimates of health risk, and
focuses exclusively on recreational harvesters of Puget Sound seafood who
comprise a subset of the general population in the Puget Sound basin.
Because of the conservative nature of U.S. EPA's risk assessment procedure,
and because of limitations in the available data, the results of this effort
should not be viewed as a definitive indication of potential health risks
associated with consumption of Puget Sound seafoods. The intent of the
report is to provide a framework for characterization of the relative hazard
associated with chemical contaminants in various seafood categories in Puget
Sound. Although not specifically addressed in this report, risks associated
with consumption of commercially harvested Puget Sound seafood should be
similar to risks associated with consumption of recreationally harvested
95
-------
Puget Sound seafood, assuming similar seafood consumption patterns and
seafood contamination levels. However, actual estimation of risks to the
general public or to consumers of commercially harvested seafood requires
information concerning background levels of chemical contamination in
seafood and in alternative foods, which is beyond the scope of this
investigation.
96
-------
REFERENCES
Allman, W.F. 1985. Staying alive in the 20th century. Science 85
(October): 31-41.
Helton, T., R. Roundy, and N. Weinstein. 1986. Managing the risks of toxic
exposure. Environment 28:19-37.
Carson, B.L., H.V. Ellis III, and J.L. McCann. 1986. Toxicology and
biological monitoring of metals in humans. Lewis Publishers, Inc. Chelsea,
NI. 328 pp.
Cirone, P. 2 September 1988. Personal Communication (unpublished letter
from the Statistical Policy Branch, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region X, Seattle,
UA.
Cirone, P. 9 September 1988. Personal communication (Telephone by
Dr. L.G. Williams). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region X,
Seattle, UA.
Crecelius, E. and C.W. Apts. 1985. Concentration and speciation of arsenic
in flatfish and crabs collected from Commencement Bay. Prepared for Tacoma-
Pierce County Health Department. Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories,
Richland, WA. 8 pp. + appendices.
Crecelius, E. 21 March 1988. Personal communication (phone by
Dr. L.G. Williams, Tetra Tech, Inc.). Battelle Northwest, Marine Research
Laboratory, Sequim, WA.
Crouch, E.A.C., R. Wilson, and L. Zeise. 1983. The risks of drinking
water. Water Resour. Res. 19:1359-1375.
Crouch, E.A.C., and R. Wilson. 1984. Inter-risk comparisons pp. 97-112
In: Assessment and Management of Chemical Risks. J.V Rodncks and
R.G. Tardriss (eds). ASC Symposium Ser. 239. American Chemical Society,
Washington, DC.
Cullen W 24 March 1988. Personal communication (phone by Dr. L.G.
Williams, Tetra Tech, Inc.). University of British Columbia, Department of
Chemistry, Vancouver, BC.
Dourson, M.L. and J.F. Stara. 1983. Regulatory historyi and experimental
support of uncertainty (safety) factors. Regul. Toxicol. and Pharmacol.
3:224-238.
97
-------
Faigenblum, J. 1988. Chemicals and bacteriological organisms in non-
commercial shellfish. State of Washington, Department of Social and Health
Services, Olympia, WA. 141 pp. + appendices.
Fein, 6.G., J.L. Jacobson, S.W. Jacobson, P.M. Schwartz, J.K. Dowler.
1984. Prenatal exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls - effects on birth
size and gestational age. 0. Pediatr. 105:315-320.
Friberg, L. 1988. The GESAMP evaluation of potentially harmful substances
in fish and other seafood with special reference to carcinogenic substances.
Aquatic Toxicol. ll:379-.393.
Friberg, L., M. Piscator, G.F. Nordberg, and T. Kjellstrom. 1974. Cadmium
in the environment. Second edition. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1973. Certain polycyclic
aromatic hydrocarbons and heterocyclic compounds. In: IARC Monographs on
the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to Man. Vol. 3. World
Health Organization, IARC, Lyon, France.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1978. Working group on the
evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. In:
International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs, Vol. 18,
Polychlorinated Biphenyls. World Health Organization, IARC, Lyon, France.
International Agency for Research on Cancer. 1983. Polynuclear aromatic
compounds. Part 1. Chemical, environmental, and experimental data. In:
IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Risk of Chemicals to
Humans. Vol. 32. World Health Organization, IARC, Lyon, France.
Konasewich, D.E., P.M. Chapman, E. Gerencher, G. Vigers, and N. Treloar.
1982. Effects, pathways, processes, and transformation of Puget Sound
contaminants of concern. NOAA Technical Memorandum OMPA-20. National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of Marine Pollution Assess-
ment, Boulder, CO. 357 pp.
Kuratsune, M. 1976. Some of the recent findings concerning Yusho. In:
National Conference on Polychlorinated Biphenyls (November 19-21, 1975,
Chicago, IL), pp. 14-29. EPA-560/6-75-004. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Toxic Substances, Washington, DC.
Landolt, M.L., F.R. Hafer, A. Nevissi, G. van Belle, K. Van Ness, and
C. Rockwell. 1985. Potential toxicant exposure among consumers of
recreatTonally caught fish from urban embayments of Puget Sound. NOAA
Technical Memorandum NOS OMA 23. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Rockville, MD. 104 pp.
Landolt, M.L., D.L. Kalman, A. Nevissi, G. van Belle, K. Van Ness, and
F.R. Hafer. 1987. Potential toxicant exposure among consumers of
recreationally caught fish from urban embayments of Puget Sound. Final
report. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OMA 33. National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Rockville, MD. Ill pp.
98
-------
Landrigan, P.O. 1980. General population exposure to environmental
concentrations of halogenated biphenyls. pp. 267-286. In: Halogenated
Biphenyls, Terphenyls, Naphthalenes, Dibenzodioxins and Related Products.
R.D. Kimbrough (ed). Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press, New York, NY.
Matta, M.B., A.J. Kearns, and M.F. Buchman. 1986. Trends in DDT and PCB in
U.S. west coast fish and invertebrates. National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Seattle, WA. 95 pp.
McCallum, M. 1985. Recreational and subsistence catch and consumption of
seafood from three urban industrial bays of Puget Sound: Port Gardner,
Elliott Bay, and Sinclair Inlet. Washington Department of Social and
Health Services, Division of Health, Olympia, WA. 59 pp.
Merrill, J. 8 February 1988. Personal communication (phone by Dr. L.G.
Williams, Tetra Tech, Inc.). American Sea Vegetable, Inc., Vashon Island,
UA.
Nash, D.A. 1971. A survey of
characteristics. Data Report No. 62.
Seattle, WA. 162 pp.
fish purchases of socio-economic
National Marine Fisheries Service,
National Research Council. 1983. Risk assessment in the federal government:
managing the process. The Committee on the Institution of Means for the
Assessment of Crisis to Public Health. Washington, DC.
Norton, D. 5 February 1986. Personal communication (memorandum to
Tom Eaton, Washington Department of Ecology, Southwest Regional Office).
Washington Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA.
Pierce, D.S., D.T. Noviello, and S.H. Rogers. 1981. Commencement Bay
seafood consumption study. Preliminary report. Tacoma-Pierce County Health
Department, Tacoma, WA. 11 pp.
Pochin, E.E. 1975. Acceptance of risk. Br. Med. Bull. 31:184-190.
PTI and Tetra Tech. 1988a. Elliott Bay action program: analysis of toxic
problem areas. Draft Report. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region X, Office of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA. Tetra Tech, Inc.,
Bellevue, WA. 330 pp + appendices.
PTI and Tetra Tech. 1988b. Everett Harbor action program: analysis of
toxic problem areas. Draft Report. Prepared for U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region X, Office of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA. Tetra Tech,
Inc., Bellevue, WA. 282 pp + appendices.
PTI. 1987. Guidance manual for assessing human health risks from chemically
contaminated fish and shellfish. Draft report to U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Marine and Estuarine Protection, Washington,
DC. PTI, Inc., Bellevue, WA. 76 pp. + appendices.
99
-------
Rogan, W.J., B.C. Gladen, J.D. McKinney, N. Carreras, P. Hardy, J. Thullen,
J. Tinglestad, and M. Tulley. 1986. Neonatal effects of tranplacental
exposure to PCBs and DDE. J. Pediatr. 109:335-341.
Schwab, B.W., S.B. Christian, D.P. Galya, D.A. Mosconi, and R.J. Fine.
1987. Final risk assessment to accompany the feasibility study of the
Cascade Pole Company site, Olympia, Washington. ERT, Inc. Concord, MA.
Stara, J.F., B.E., R.C. Hertzberg, R.O.F. Bruins, M.L. Dourson, P.R. Durkin,
L.S. Erdreich, and W.E. Pepelko. 1983. Approaches to risk assessment of
chemical mixtures. Report presented at the Second International Conference
on Safety Evaluation and Regulation, Cambridge, MA. 23 pp.
Swain, W. 1988. Human health consequences of consumption of fish
contaminated with organochlorine compounds. Aquatic Toxicol. 11:357-377.
Tetra Tech. 1985. Commencement Bay nearshore/tideflats remedial investiga-
tion. Volume 1. Final Report. EPA-910/9-85-134b. Prepared for the
Washington Department of Ecology and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA.
Tetra Tech. 1986. Guidance manual for health risk assessment of chemically
contaminated seafood. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Region X, Office of Puget Sound, Seattle, WA. Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue,
WA. 69 pp. + appendices.
Tetra Tech. 1987. Bioaccumulation monitoring guidance: selection of
target species and review of available bioaccuraulation data. EPA 430/9-86-
006. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Marine
and Estuarine Protection, Washington, DC. Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA
52 pp. + appendix.
Tetra Tech. 1988. Assessment of expedited response actions Wyckoff
Company - Bainbridge Island. Prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region X and Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. Tetra Tech, Inc.,
Bellevue, WA. 204 pp. + appendices.
Travis, C.C., and H.A. Haltemer-Frey. 1988. Determining an acceptable
level of risk. Environ. Sci. Technol. 22:873-876.
Travis, C.C., S.A. Richter, E.A.C. Crouch, R. Wilson, E.D. Klema. 1987.
Cancer risk management: a review of 132 federal regulatory decisions.
Environ. Sci. and Technol. 21:415-420.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1980. Water quality criteria
documents; availability. U.S. EPA, Washington, DC. Federal Register Vol.
45, No. 231, Part V. pp. 79318-79379.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1981. Hazard profile for PAH.
U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, Washington, DC.
100
-------
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1984a. Health assessment document
for arsenic. EPA-600/8-83-021F. U.S. EPA, Office of Health and Environ-
mental Assessment, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1984b. Health effects assessment for
DDT. EPA/540/1-86-026. U.S. EPA, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency
Response, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1984c. Health effects assessment for
lindane. ECAO-CIN-H056. U.S. EPA, Environmental Criteria and Assessment
Office, Cincinnati, OH.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1984d. Health effects assessment for
lead. U.S. EPA, Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office, Cincinnati,
OH.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1984e. Mercury health effects
update. Health issue assessment. EPA-600/8-84-019F. U.S. EPA, Office of
Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986a. Guidelines for carcinogen
risk assessment. Federal Register Vol. 51, No. 185, pp. 33992-34003.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986b. Guidelines for exposure
assessment. Federal Register Vol. 51, No. 185, pp. 34042-34054.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986c. Guidelines for the health risk
assessment of chemical mixtures. Federal Register Vol. 51, No. 185, pp.
34014-34025.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986d. Superfund public health
evaluation manual. EPA 540/1-86/060. U.S. EPA, Office of Emergency and
Remedial Response, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1987a. Health advisories for
Leqionella and seven inorganics. National Technical Information Service
PB87-235586. U.S. EPA, Office of Drinking Water, Washington, DC. 126 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1987b. Health advisories for
16 pesticides. National Technical Information Service PB87-200176.
U.S. EPA, Office of Drinking Water, Washington, DC. 262 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1987c. o c
25 organics. National Technical Information Service PB87-235578. U.S. EPA,
Office of Drinking Water, Washington, DC. 399 pp.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 1982 Levels for n Poisonous or
deleterious substances in human food and animal feed. U.S. FDA, Washington,
DC. 13 pp.
101
-------
U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 1984. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs)
In fish and shellfish; reduction of tolerances; final decision. U.S. FDA,
Rockville, MO. Rederal Register, Vol. 49, No. 100. pp. 21514-21520.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1985. National primary drinking
water regulations; synthetic organic chemicals, inorganic chemicals and
microorganisms; proposed rule. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Washington, DC. Federal Register, Vol. 50, No. 219, pp. 46936-47022.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1987a. Integrated Risk Information
System (IRIS). Vol. I - Supportive Documentation EPA 600/8-86/032a, and
Vol II - Chemical Files EPA 600/8-86/032b. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Office of Health and Environmental Assessment, Washington, DC.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1988. Drinking water criteria
document for PCBs. ECAO-CIN-414. April 1988. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
Versar. 1985. Assessment of human health risk from ingesting fish and
crabs from Commencement Bay. EPA 910/9-85-129. Report prepared for the
Washington Department of Ecology under contract to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. Versar,
Inc., Springfield, VA. 53 pp.
Vettorazzi, G. 1976. Safety factors and their application in the toxicolog-
ical evaluation, pp. 207-223. In: The evaluation of toxicological data for
the protection of public health. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England.
Vettorazzi, 6. 1980. Handbook of international food regulatory toxicology.
Vol I: Evaluations. Spectrum Publications, New York, NY. pp. 66-68.
Yake, B., J. Joy, and A. Johnson. 1984. Chemical contaminants in clams and
crabs from Eagle Harbor, Washington State, with emphasis on polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons. Washington Department of Ecology, Water Quality
Investigations Section. Olympia, WA. 28 pp.
102
-------
APPENDIX A
DATA FOR 1986-1987 STUDIES OF CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS IN
SALMON, SHELLFISH, AND MACROALGAE
-------
CONTENTS
Page
APPENDIX A-l: SALMON DATA AND QA REVIEWS A-l
APPENDIX A-2: SHELLFISH DATA AND QA REVIEWS A-42
APPENDIX A-3: MACROALGAE DATA AND QA REVIEWS A-68
-------
APPENDIX A-l
SALMON DATA AND QA REVIEWS
A-l
-------
/!T\ UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
flSt ^ REGION 10 LABORATORY
l^Sur/ MANCHESTER. WASHINGTON 98353
***/
BEPIV TO
*m. OF M/r$ Lab September 24, 1987
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: REVI£W puGET $OUMD SALMQM COMTAMINATIOM STUDY DATA
FROM:
Joseph M. Blazevich, Region 10 Chemist v/16^ P*
Raleigh Farj^, Region 10 QA Officer ^
T0: File
We have completed our review of the Puget Sound salmon contamination
study data. The study was conducted during the first quarter of 1987 and
includes samples numbered 87040500 - 87040556. All results are judged
acceptable but the following comments should be considered by the data
user.
PESTICIDES
Pesticides were analyzed using EPA Region 10 procedure for pesticides
in tissue samples employing the determinative steps found in method 608.
Holding Times: All fish were held frozen for one to four months until
extraction. EPA has not established holding times for fish tissue.
Blanks; All blanks are acceptable. No pesticides were detected
at or above method detection limits.
Spike Results: Surrogate spike, matrix spike and duplicate matrix
spikes are acceptable. Each matrix spike contains at least 12 different
pesticides. A summary of the surrogate and spike recovery data 1s found in
Table 1. Selected individual spiked recovery data 1s found in Table 2. Mo
standard reference material for pesticides in fish tissue is available.
Table 1. SUHMARY - PESTICIDE SURROGATE and MATRIX SPIKE RESULTS
Parameter Mean(%) Std.Dev. RSO(%) Range
Surrogate 1 97.1 15.6 16.1 63-130
Matrix spike 1 72.1 8.6 11.7 60-90
Matrix spike 2 69.9 10.4 14.9 39-82
Matrix spike 3 85.0 33.5 39.4 38-157*
Matrix spike 4 64.7 11.9 18.4 48-97
* severe matrix interference resulted in high recoveries for p.p'-DDE.
A-2
-------
Table 2 PERCENT RECOVERIES OF SELECTED PESTICIDES IN SPIKED TISSUES (l-5ppb)
Compound spike 1 spike 2 spike 3 spike 4 Mean Std.Dev. RSD
aldrin 65 73 82 65 71 8.1 11.3
dieldHn 67 66 43 54 58 11.3 19.7
4 4'-OOT 86 77 80 65 77 8.8 11.5
4 4'-DDE 70 82 157 97 102 38.6 38.0
4V-DDD 90 81 72 77 80 7.6 9.5
alpha endosulfan 62 39 38 48 47 11.1 23.8
beta endosulfan 71 65 73 74 71 4.0 5.7
endosulfan sulfate 73 71 a 54 66 10.4 15.8
endrin 75 68 a 69 71 3.8 5.4
heptachlor 72 74 92 57 74 14.3 19.4
heptachlor epoxlde 79 74 68 67 72 5.6 7.8
alpha BHC 60 65 123 58 77 31.1 40.7
beta BHC 69 69 116 63 79 24.7 31.1
delta BHC 79 75 76 65 74 6.1 8.2
a = not determined for this analyte.
METALS
Metals were analyzed using EPA Region 10 procedure for metals in
tissue samples. This method employs the determinative steps described in
EPA's "Methods for Chemical Analyses for Water and Waste Water".
Holding Times: All fish were held frozen for one to three months
until digestion!EPA has not established holding times for fish tissue.
Blanks: Standard laboratory practice 1s to group method procedure
blanks From two or more sample sets when a "true" blank sample is not
available (e.g. fish tissue, soil and sediment). Procedure blanks
analyzed before, during and after the salmon tissue samples were found
to be acceptable and constitute a method blank for the sample set.
Spike Results: Although spike data show low recoveries for some
arsenic and mercury spikes (49 to 701), all others fall within the CLP
required 75 to 125% range. This range was established for water and
sediment/sol1. Since EPA has not established an acceptable range for spike
metal recoveries in fish and since fish tissue, particularly fatty tissue,
is considered a difficult matrix, the CLP ranges for acceptance are used only
as a guide. In fact, 48% of We spiked parameters fall within +3% of the
actual spiked value. Similarly, 68% fall within +7% and 78% faTl within
+151 of the actual spiked value. The metal recovery data is found in
Table 3.
A-3
-------
TateTe 3. PERCENT RECOVERIES OF METALS IN SELECTED SPIKED TISSUES
"" tu.z to 10 ppm)
Metal Spike 1 Spike 2 Spike 3 Spike 4 Mean Std.Oev. RSD
ctnroriuM 102 106 102 100 102.5 2.5 2.5
zinc 92 98 113 106 102.3 9.2 9.0
rrtckel 100 97 96 99 98.0 1.8 1.9
copper 100 95 111 103 102.3 6.7 6.6
antimony 97 103 100 103 100.8 2.9 2.9
arsenic 120 64 66 101 87.8 27.4 31.2
cadariiw 107 93 88 95 95.8 8.1 8.4
lead 82 79 88 101 87.5 9.7 11.1
•ercury 49 50 54 66 54.8 7.8 14.3
silver 98 98 95 98 97.3 1.5 1.5
All average recovery results for EPA Standard Reference Material are
acceptable. Recovery data for NBS Research Material "50" Albacore tuna
is acceptable. Although observed zinc values are high and arsenic
levels are low, they are consistent and considered acceptable for a
research grade material. Recoveries for both reference materials are
found in Table 4.
Table 4. EPA STANDARD REFERENCE and NBS RESEARCH MATERIAL SAMPLE RECOVERIES
Metal Standard Range Sample 1 Sample 2 Sample 3 Sample 4 % Diff
EPA STANDARD REFERENCE SAMPLE
chromium MDL-1.34 0.60 0.70 a a 15.3
zinc 35.5-51.7 43.7 42.9 a a 1.8
nickel MDL-1.10 0.75 0.65 a a 14.3
copper 0.93-3.49 3.7 2.9 a a 24.2
arsenic 0.85-4.01 3.7 4.15 a a 11.5
cadMium MDL-0.32 0.165 0.145 a a 12.9
lead MDL-0.62 O.OSu O.OSu a a
•ercury 1.24-3.80 1.94 1.98 a a 2.0
NBS RESEARCH MATERIAL "50"
Zinc 11.4-14.6 16.1 16.3 15.8 16.2 1.3*
arsenic 2.76-4.6 2.6 2.45 a a 5.9
a 3 sample not analyzed for this analyte.
*a relative standard deviation rather than % difference is shown.
IQA's
Analysis of fish tissue was conducted using EPA Region 10 procedure
for VGA's in tissue samples, employing heated purge and trap with GC/MS.
Ail VOA data was collected under acceptable BF8 tune.
A-4
-------
Holding Times: All fish tissue were held frozen up to one month
until VOA analysis was performed. EPA has not established holding times
for fish tissue.
Blanks: All blanks are acceptable eventhough less than Ippb of toluene and
methylene chloride and 4ppb of 2-butanone were detected.
Spike Results; At least 34 different volatile compounds were added
to each matrix spike. Three surrogate compounds were added to all matrix
spikes, duplicate matrix spikes, samples and blanks. Individual compound
recoveries with percent differences are found In Table 5. A summary of
the surrogate and spike recovery data 1s found In Table 6.
Table 5. PERCENT RECOVERIES OF VGA's IN SELECTED SPIKED TISSUES USOppbl
Compound Spike I Spike 2 % Difference
chloromStnane 110 76 36.6
bromomlthane 92 120 26.4
vinyl chloride 24 87 113.5
chloroethane 140 110 24.0
methylene chloride 100 69 36.7
acetone 220 240 8.7
carbon disulflde 70 55 24.0
I,l-d1chloroethene 89 68 26.8
I,l-d1chloroethane 97 87 10.9
trans-l,2-d1chloroethene 86 77 11.0
chloroform 88 85 3.5
l,2-d1chloroethane 70 97 32.3
2-butanone 160 160 0.0
1,1,1-trlchloroethane 75 76 1.3
carbon tetrachloride 66 82 21.6
vinyl acetate 74 78 5.3
bromodlchloromehtane 100 100 0.0
l,2-d1chloropropane 98 110 11.5
trans-l,3-d1chloropropene 84 89 5.8
trlchloroethene 99 93 6.3
dfbromochloromethane 72 69 4.3
1,1,2-tr1chloroethane 91 94 3.2
benzene 110 110 0.0
cis-l,3-d1chloropropene 84 89 5.8
bromoform 63 60 4.9
2-hexanone 120 140 15.4
4-methyl-2-pentanone 120 110 8.7
tetrachloroethene 90 92 2.2
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 64* 57 11.6
toluene 95 90 5.4
chlorobenzene 92 84 6.8
ethylbenzene 90 93 3.3
styrene 84 74 12.7
A-5
-------
Table 6. SUMMARY - VGA SURROGATE and MATRIX SPIKE RESULTS
Parameter Mean (%) Std.Dev RSD(%) Range
Surrogate 1 98.0 23.5 24.0 78-136
Surrogate 2 102.8 5.6 5.5 97-112
Surrogate 3 74.0 13.8 18.6 63-97
Matrix spike 1 93.8 32.7 34.8 24-220*
Matrix spike 2 94.1 33.9 36.0 60-240*
* severe matrix Interference resulted 1n high recoveries of acetone and
2-butanone.
All surrogate recoveries fall within CLP required ranges. Although
the ranges were established for water and sediment/sol1, they may be used
as a guide for tissue samples, a more complex matrix. Also, matrix spike
results are considered acceptable.
BASE-NEUTRAL/ACIDS
Analysis of fish tissue was conducted using EPA Region 10 BN/A tissue
procedure. The method employs acetone extraction with a^.polytron blender.
After extract concentration, the total is added to acidic water and extracted
with methylene chloride. Following clean-up of the resulting-water extract
with GPC, MW 2000 and MW 400, analysis is performed by GC/MS. All BN/A data
was collected under acceptable OFTPP tune.
Holding Tiroes: All fish tissue were held frozen for one to three months
until extraction. EPA has not established holding times for fish tissue.
Blanks: All blanks were acceptable. Although b1s(2-ethy1hexyl) phthalate
(<110ppb), dloctyl phthalate (<560ppb), butylbenzyl phthalate (<10ppb) and a
trace of PCP (<25ppb) were found in the blanks, only dloctyl phthalate was
detected In the samples.
Spike Results: Recovery accuracy and precision data are found in
Tables 7, 8 and 9. Results cover 51 compounds spiked at three levels
(80, 160 and 800 ppb). The results presented In Tables 7, 8, and 9 represent
four analyses at each spiking level for a total of twelve matrix spikes.
All spiked compounds were found to be recovered within acceptable ranges
except for PCP, which was consistently high. Estimated method detection
limits (MOD for base-neutral/acid compounds fall between 70 and 100 ppb.
MOL's represent real sample detection limits, not projected or calculated
Hlues. Of course, MOL's will change when dilution, amount of fish
extracted, etc. change for each sample.
All surrogate results fall'within CLP required ranges. The ranges
*ere established for water and sediment/soil and are used only as a guide
for tissue analyses. A summary of the surrogate spike recovery data for
the fish tissue samples is found in Table 10. Matrix spike and surrogate
recoveries are acceptable.
A-6
-------
Table 7
Fish Spike Data (SOppb)
Compound
1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE
1,2-0 tCHLQROBENZENE
1,3-D ICHLOROBENZENE
1,4-D ICHLOROBENZENE
2,4,5-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4-D I CHLOROPHENOL
2,4-D IMETH YLPHENOL
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-CHLORQPHENOL
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE
2-METHYLPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
4,6-D INITRO-2-METHYLPHEN
4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHE
4-CHLOROPHEN YL -PHEN YLETH
4-CHLQRO-3-METHYLPHENOL
4-HETHYLPHENOL
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZQ (A) ANTHRACENE
BENZO(A)PYRENE
BENZO (B) FLUORANTHENE
BENZOCG,H, I)PERYLENE
BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE
BIS( 2-CHLQROETHOX Y) METHA
EIS( 2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER
BIS (2-CHLOROISOPROP YL) ET
BUTYLBSNZYLPHTHALATE
CHRYSENE
OIBENZCFURAN
OIBENZ (A, H) ANTHRACENE
OrSTHYLPHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
?LUORANTHENE
FUUGRENE
HSXACHLdRQBEN ZENE
HSXACHLC3CEUTADIENE
HEXACHLCRCETHANE
1NOENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE
*?SQPHORONE
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
H-NITRQSO-DI -N-PROPYLAMI
PSNTACHLCRaPHENOL
PH6NANTHRENE
PHENOL
PYRENE
% Std. Dev,
RSD 2
Ave
Min
Max
74.19
S8.ll
42.09
31.74
79.22
139.84
9O.33
129,41
7O.09
73.00
89.92
72.77
85.47
110.81
66.97
33.88
105.91
102.16
82.31
139.00
103.16
99. 3O
79.03
114.88
103. OO
1O6.75
83.91
106.75
88.31
67.34
68.94
156.67
89.16
94.41
83.38
113.91
109,84
88.06
tot. so
106.91
71.06
44.19
81.47
147.91
81.44
94.89
7O.34
214.13
14O.50
89. 5O
111.88
94.35
33. S8
•^14 1 ~
•» • " . ^ -w
6.72
14.16
7.70
11.66
18.03
20 .'36
4.94
36.63
18.36
11.92
3.92
27.84
5.72
14.81
3.99
27.99
16.24
12.95
37.12
8.70
3.01
24.33
12.47
12.47
7.08
7.24
7 . 0"8
6.21
16.81
11.47
4t.'27
13.37
8.91
12.83
20.79
9.73
14.38
7.28
19.83
6.84
18.69
11% 43
61.27
7.19
41.15
9.66
64. 4O
21.85
24.06
13.78
17.02
3.99
64.40
9 . 17.
24.47.
18.3%
22.37.
22.37.
14.77.
3 .37.
28 . 37.
26 . 27.
16.37.
6.67.
38 . 37.
6 . 77.
13.47.
6 . 07.
26 . 47.
13.97.
15.77.
26 . 77.
8 . 47.
5 . 07.
31.17.
10 . 97.
12.17.
6 . 67.
S.6X
6 . 67.
7 . 07.
25 . 07.
16.67.
26 . 37.
15.07.
9 . 47.
13.47.
17.97.
a.9>:
16.37.
7 . 27.
18.67.
9 . o7.
42.3X
14.07.
41.47.
3 . 87,
43.47.
13.77.
30.17,
15.6/:
26.97.
12.37.
17.57.
5 . 07.
43 . 47.
A-7
-------
Table 8
Fish Spike Data (160ppb) "ean * St<*- Dev. RSD %
Compound- ——— •—_,_—.———————.—
1,2,4-TRrCm.aROBENZENe 61.36 13.09 21.37.
1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE 41.13 14.96 36.4%
1,3-DICHLGROBENZENE 31.85 17.26 54.27.
1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE 35.58 16.26 45.77.
2,4,5-TRICHLORGPHENOL 1O8.56 33.73 31.15:
2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL 126. OO 7150 6.07.
2,4-DICHLORaPHENOL 86.63 7.33 3.57.
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENGL 1O4.06 22.11 21.27.
2,4-DINITRQTGLUENE 65.38 22.42 34.37.
2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 73.25 10.37 13.87.
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE 79.36 6.03 7.67.
-»-CHLORCPHENOL 71.50 11.88 16.67.
2-METHYLNAPHTHALENE 80.63 9.96 12.47.
2-METHYLPHENOL 111.88 33.13 31.47.
2-NITRQPHENGL 56.88 7.17 12.67.
4,6-DINlTRO-2-METHYLPHEN 37.30 14.95 40.17.
4-BRGMGPHENYL-PHENYLETHE 80.69 10.97 13.67.
4-CHLORCPHENYL-PHENYLETH 90.44 4.80 5.37.
4-CHLORQ-3-«ETHYI_PHENOL 126.19 66.19 52.37.
4-METHYLPHENGL 117.25 37.74 32.27.
ACENAPHTHENE 88.88 4.32 4.97.
ACENAPHTHYLENE 92.06 2.48 2.77.
ANTHRACENE 84.49 40.05 47.47.
SEN ZQ( A) ANTHRACENE 110.44 10.46 9.57.
SENZQ(A)PYRENE 92.73 4.61 5,07.
SENZC(S)FLUGRANTHENE 93.19 7.30 7.87.
SEN ZC C G,H,I) PERYLENE 90.94 20.33 22.47.
BENZQdOFLUORANTKENE 93.92 3.44 9.07.
BIS(2-CHLORCETHQXY)«ETHA 74.13 7.10 9.67.
9IS(2-CHLQRCETHYL)ETHER 51.56 9.01 17.27.
.SIS(2-CHLORGISOPRQPY!_)£T 48.18 15.99 33.27.
BUTYLBENZYLPHTHALATE 109.42 21.64 19.37.
CHRYSENE 83.25 14.99 17.07.
DIBENZCFUFAN 83.33 3.40 3.37.
D13ENZ( A, H) ANTHRACENE 98.63 19.99 20.37.
DIETHYLPHTHALATE 103.38 9.83 9.37.
OinETHYL PHTHALATE 101.94 3.39 5.37.
FLUORANTHENE 101.73 33.08 34.37.
FLUORENE 95.38 6.11 6.47.
HEXACHLCSGSENZEME 96.44 11.10 11.57.
34.93 13.30 23.7T-:
~0.23 14. ~2 a~. Z".
INCENQ(l.r.3-CO}PYRE.^E 93.44 19.14 20.27.
I SuPHGFGNE 71.94. 6.55 9.17.
NAPHTHALENE -fj9.69 12.61 13.1"
MTRQBENZENE 89.23 15.10 la.97.
61.56 5.58 9.17.
17~.5O 27.00 15.7%
=HEMAN Ti-iFE-NE SS. 19 27.61 31.3/1
PHENOL 76.31 23.49 30.SX
PYRENE 94.06 18.59 19.37.
Avs Sa.27 15.9= 20.4V.
Mir 30.23 1-48 2.77.
Max 172.50 c6.i9 34.27.
A-8
-------
Table 9
Fish Spike Data (SOOppb)
Compound
1,2, 4-TR I CHLOROBENZENE
1,2-DICHLORQBENZENE
1,3-OICHLOROBENZENE
1 , 4-D ICHLOROBENZENE
2,4, 3-TRICHLOROPHENOL
2,4, 6-TR I CHLORQPHENOL
2 , 4-D I CHLQROPHENOL
2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL
2,4-DINITROTOLUENE
2,6-0 INI TROTOLUENE
2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE
2-CHLORQPHENOL
2-nETHYLNAPHTHALENE
2H1ETHYLPHENOL
2-NITROPHENOL
4,6-DINITRO-2-METHYLPHEN
4-BROMOPHENYL-PHENYLETHE
4-CHLORQPHENYL-PHENYLETH
4-CHLQRO-3-flETHYLPHENOL
4-METHYLPHENOL
ACENAPHTHENE
ACENAPHTHYLENE
ANTHRACENE
BENZO ( A ) ANTHRACENE
8ENZO(A)PYRENE
BENIO ( 3 ) FLUCRANTHENE
BENZO ( G , H , I i PER YLENE
BENZO ( K ) FLUORANTHENE
8IS(2-CHLCIRaETHOXY)METHA
BIS ( 2-CHLQRQETHYL ) ETHER
BIS ( 2-CHLORC I SOPROP YL ) ET
BUTYL3ENZYLPHTHALATE
CHRYSENE
DI8ENZCFURAN
DIBENZ ( A , H ) ANTHRACENE
OIETHYLPHTHALATE
DIMETHYL PHTHALATE
R.UORANTHENE
R-UORENE
HEXACHLQR08EN ZENE
HSXACHLOP-aSUTAu IENE
HEXACHLCRGETHANE
INCENG ( i . Z , 3 -CD ) PYRENE
iSOPKCP-QNE
NAPHTHALENE
NITROBENZENE
H-NITHOSa-0 I -N-PSCPYLAM I
PSMTACKLC-P.CFH£?-!CL
Mean % Std. Dev,
RSD
PHENOL
PVRENE
five
63.73
36.00
24.23
27.75
88.75
10O.OO
32.50
60.00
76.75
SO. 50
81.25
73. SO
81.50
78.75
66.00
62.25
83. SO
91. OO
96.30
95.25
82.25
90.25
72.25
103.25
86.75
92.75
72.75
92.50
67.75
45.75
48.75
92.25
90.75
86.75
77.75
94.25
91.50
92.75
91.00
92.25
51.00
22 . 30
73.25
65.25
66 . SO
55.25
58.75
16O.OO
93.50
71.00
93.00
4.15
2.35
2.17
2.28
21.28
15^67
7.89
35.80
5.54
9.86
8.70
6.54
7.92
19.56
7.55
11.71
5.94
5.79
12.34
6.53
8.50
14.10
22.25
5.63
10.16
13.37
16 ,.6.4
12.97
9.91
4.49
10 . 03
42.63
13 . 55
7.66
13.05
6.22
1.50
3.64
9.25
10 . 03
5.79
2.50
12.97
10.57
6.37
7.33
6.76
37.*-
5.72
12.14
13.36
6. 57.
6.57.
a . 97.
8.27.
24.O7.
15.7%
9 . 67.
59 . 77.
7 . 27.
12.37.
10 . 77.
8 . 97.
9 . 77.
24 . 87.
11.47.
18.87.
6 . 97.
6.4X
12.87.
6 . 97.
10 . 37.
15.67.
30 . 87.
5.57.
11.77.
14.47.
23 . 27.
14.07.
14.67.
9 . 87.
20.67.
46 . 27.
14.97.
8 . 87.
16 . 87.
6 . 67.
1.67.
9 . 37.
10.27.
10.97.
1 1 . 37.
11. 1/1
16.67.
16.27.
10 . 37.
i 3.67.
11.57.
23.4/;
6.17.
17.17.
14.4V.
77.08
16O.OO
i.SO
42.63
A-9
-------
Table 10. SUMMARY - BASE-NEUTRAL/ACIDS SURROGATE RESULTS
Parameter Mean (!) Std.Dev. RSD(%) Range
Acid surrogate 1 48 16 33 32-66
Acid surrogate 2 47 14 30 28-59
B/N surrogate 1 58 3.9 6.8 54-63
B/M surrogate 2 85 8.1 9.5 76-95
B/N surrogate 3 92 4.9 5.3 88-97
B/N surrogate 4 103 4.0 3.9 99-106
A-10
-------
It
INTEROFFICE MEMO
1ITII* TBCM, INC.
TO Project File, TC-3338-28, QA/QC OATH 12/23/87
Lynne Kilpatrick-Howard
QA/qc Review of the Pugpt. Sound Salmon Contamination
Study Data and Report Generated by Joseph N. Blazevich,
U.S. EPA Region X
Ny review of the Puget Sound Salmon Contamination Study data and the
memorandum generated by Joseph N. Blazevich and Raleigh Farlow of U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region X has been completed. Unless
noted otherwise, the results are judged acceptable and comments noted by the
U.S. EPA reviewer are appropriate.
The following database qualifiers were assigned to the Puget Sound
salmon data submitted:
U - Undetected
J - Estimated value for one of the following reasons: compound
verified but not quantified because value exceeded the five-point
calibration curve, compound is tentatively identified, response
factor may be low, or the standard was not within the allowed 25
percent response factor difference
M - Compound verified below quantification limit
B - Compound detected in associated blank
NAR > No analysis results
NAI - Not analyzed because of interference.
HOLDING TIME OF PESTICIDES IN TISSUE
The reviewer noted that "all fish were held frozen for one to four
•onths until extraction. U.S. EPA has not established holding times for
fish tissue." The Puget Sound Estuary Program (PSEP) (Tetra Tech 1986)
A-ll
-------
recommends a maximum holding time for frozen tissue samples of 6 mo.
Therefore, the 1- to 4-mo actual holding time for the samples is within PSEP
guidelines.
HOLDING TIME OF METALS IN TISSUE
The U.S. EPA reviewer noted that "all fish were held for one to three
months until digestion," and that "EPA has not established holding times for
fish tissue." PSEP recommends a maximum holding time for frozen fish
samples of 6 mo for all metals except mercury, which has a recommended
holding time of 28 days. Because precise holding times were not provided, it
was not possible to determine whether the PSEP holding time guideline for
mercury was exceeded.
COMPOUNDS DETECTED IN BLANKS
The U.S. EPA reviewer noted that toluene and methylene chloride were
detected in the blanks at concentrations <1 ppb, 2-butanone was detected at
4 ppb, and dioctylphthalate was present at <560 ppb. Based on the available
data, it is not likely that the sample results have been corrected for the
above blank contributions.
REFERENCES
Tetra Tech. 1986. Recommended protocols for measuring selected environmental
variables in Puget Sound. Final Report. Prepared for Puget Sound Estuary
Program. Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, MA.
A-12
-------
Projects AM«-O«9A
Sa«pl* (to: «7 040500
Laboratory: RX
•••pi* oat*: «7/Ol/l» 16:00
Description: AHACORTIS
Dapth:
Account 1 AMI.B2P
Q* Cod* t
| Metals - Specified
| Paraaater
Arsenic A*—Ti**
Nickel Bi-Tiss
Antiaony Sb-Tiss
Silver Ag-Tia*
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Iiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tisa
Chroaiua Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| Organic* - General
j Paraacter
Fat Hex Extr
^ | P«st/PCB - PP Scan
(jj j Parameter
4 ,4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4 ,4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadien*
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
dalta-BHC
alpha-Endosulf an
Spike Hexabroaobenzene
Heptachlor epoxida
Endosulfan sulfat*
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphen*
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
Tissue | | Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue |
Result Unit* j j ••* Continued **• j
0.07 ag/kg-wt PCB - 1232 10U ug/kg
0.01U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1241 10U ug/kg
0.002U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1016 10U ug/kg
0.043 ag/kg-wt beta-Endosulf an lu ug/kg
0.01U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
1.25 ag/kg-wt
3.5 ag/kg-wt
0.01 ag/kg-wt
0.002U ag/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Unit* j
0.24 Percent
Tissue |
Result unit* j
IU ug/kg
iu ug/kg
IU ug/kg
iu ug/kg
IU ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
IU ug/kg
9 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
iu ug/kg
IU ug/kg
. IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
iu ug/kg
HAR ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
lu ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
24 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Saaple Coaplete)
-------
19-OCT-I7
09:25:23
Project: AMB-OSSA
Sasiple MO: 17 040501
Laboratory: RX
CPA Region X Lab Management lystei
Sample/Project Analytic Results
PUGET SOUND SALMON CONTAMINATION STUDY
Begin Sample Date: 87/01/20 11:30 Source: fiih Tissue
Description: ANACORTES
Officer: DTB
Depth:
a
Account: AMLB2C
«* Code:
I Metals -
j Parameter
Arsenic
Nickel
Antistony
Silver
' Mercury
Lead
Copper
Zinc
Chronius)
Cadstiua
| Organic*
j Parasieter
Specified
As-Tiss
Ni-Tiss
Sb-Tiss
Ag-Tiss
Hg-Tiss
Pb-Tiss
Cu-Tiss
Sn-Tiss
Cr-Tiss
Cd-Tiss
- General
Tissue
Result
0.39
0.12
0.01U
0.002U
0.026
0.01U
1.04
3.7
0.01U
0.002U
Tissue
Result
1
Units j
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
1
Units I
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue
j •*• Continued •••
|DBrakffta*fl>4>s* • * • •• 1 l*
f mf »m9tf9 f
PCB
PCB
PCB
- 1232
- 1241
- 1016
beta-fndosulf an
PCB
- 1242
••^ SV «• * •>
10U
10U
10U
1U
10U
Units
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
rat
Hex Eitr
0.073 Percent
| Fest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4'-DDT
Chlordane
gavaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Cndrin
Methonychlor
4. 4'-ODD
4,4'-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Haxachlorobensene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
d«lta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spike HexabroMobensene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endoaulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
Tissue
Result Units
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
MAR ug/kg
1U ug/kg
4 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1M ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
96% ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
16 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
[Saaple Complete)
-------
riojmatt AM»-0«»A
•••pi* Mai S7 04OS1O
Laboratory: BX
s-Sj * - > K - -~i Sr - *" Jca i s s s x = " fc - = a z £'S'
VUOBT • OUIIB • At.MOH COM*AMIHATXOH *TUDX
••gin Saaple Date: «7/Oi/17 09:30 Source! rich Ti»»ue
Description: EVERETT HARBOR, FIB TAG 10562
COBBent: B/B/A DETBCTIOII LIMITS ARE ESTIMATED
OCClevrt Dtm
Depth:
QA Coda:
| Metals - Specified
| Parameter
Arsenic
Nickel
Antimony
Silver
Mercury
Lead
Copper
Zinc
ChroaiuB
CadBiua
As-TitS
Ni-Tiss
Sb-Tis*
Ag-Tiss
Hg-Tiii
Pb-Tiss
Cu-Titt
Zn-Tiss
cr-Tiss
Cd-Tiss
| Organic* - General
| Parameter
Fat
Hex Extr
01 | VOA - PP Scan (QCMS)
I Parameter
Tissue
Result units
0.93 Bg/kg-wt
0.38 Bg/kg-wt
0.01U Bg/kg-wt
0.002U »g/kg-wt
0.035 mg/kg-wt
0.01U «g/kg-wt
0.5« Bg/kg-*»t
3.4 «g/kg-wt
0.01U ag/kg-wt
0.004 »g/kg-wt
| VOA - PP Scan (QCMS) Tissue
| •** Continued •*•
| Parameter Result Units
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.012 Percent
Tissue
Result Units
Carbon Tetrachloride 27U ug/kg
Acetone 49J ug/kg
Chlorofora 2'« ug/kg
Bensene 27U ug/kg
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 27U ug/kg
Broaoaethane 540 ug/kg
ChloroBethane S4U ug/kg
Cbloroethane 54U ug/kg
Vinyl Chloride 54U ug/kg
Methylene Chloride 14UJ ug/kg
Carbon DisulCide 27U ug/kg
BroBofora 27U ug/kg
BroBodichloroB«thane 27U ug/kg
1,1-Dichloroethane 27U ug/kg
1,1-Dichloroethene 27U ug/kg
1,2-Dichloropropane 27U ug/kg
2-Butanone S4U ug/kg
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 27U ug/kg
Trichloroethen* 27U ug/kg
1,1,2,2-T«trachloroetha S4U ug/kg
Total Xylenes 27U ug/kg
Ethylbensane 27U ug/kg
Styrene 27U ug/kg
1 , 2-Dichloroethane 27U ug/kg
I I B/N Extract Scan Tissue
j j ••• Continued »**
I I Paraaeter Result Units
Vinyl Acetate
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Toluene
Chlorobensene
2-Chl o r oe thy 1 vinyl ether
DibroBochloroae thane
Tetrachloroethene
trans-l,2-Dichloro«th«n
2-He>anone
Spike D4-l,2-Dichloroet
Spike 1 ,4-BroBof luorobe
Spike DI-Toluene
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1 ,3-Dichloroprope
| B/H Extract Scan
j Paraaeter
Benso(a Ipyrene
Dibenso ( a, hi anthracene
Benso(a)anthracene
Hexachloroethane
Hexachlorocyclopentadie
Isophorone
Acenaphthene
Diethylphthalate
Oi-n-Butylphthalate
Phenanthrene
Butylbensylphthalate
N-NitroiodiphenylaBine
Pluorene
Hexachlorobutadiene
2— Nitroaniline
Naphthalene
2 -Methyl naphthalene
2-Chloronaphthal«ne
3,3'-Dichlorobensidine
1,2-Dichlorobensene
Nitrobenzene
3-Nitroaniline
4-Mi t roaniline
4-BroBophenyl-ph«nyl«th
1,4-Dichlorobensene
S4U ug/kg
54U ug/kg
1.4BJ ug/kg
21U ug/kg
54U ug/kg
27U ug/kg
21U ug/kg
27U ug/kg
S4U ug/kg
78% ug/kg
97% ug/kg
112% ug/kg
27U ug/kg
27U ug/kg
Tissue
Result Units
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
17JB ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
930UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
3SOUJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
930UJ ug/kg
930UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
4-Cbloroaniline
bis ( 2-Chlo roe thy 1) Ether
bis(2-Chloroethoxy )Meth
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthal
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
Hexachlorobensene
Anthracene
1, 2,4-Trichlorobensene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Pyrene
Dia« thy Iphtha late
Dibensof uran
Benso(ghi )perylene
Indeno (1,2, 3-cd) py rene
Benco(b)ene
Spike 2-Pluorobiphenyl
Spike D14-Terphenyl
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylet
bis( 2-Chloroisopropyl )E
I Acid Extract Scan
j Paraaater
2,4-Dinitrophenol
4 -Ch lor o-3 -Methyl phenol
Bensoic acid
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Nitrophenol
2-Methylphenol
o-Chlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol
4-Nitroph«nol
Benzyl Alcohol
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
730BJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190BUJ ug/kg
96% ug/kg
56% ug/kg
82% ug/kg
106% ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
190UJ ug/kg
Tissue
Result Units
470UJ ug/kg
97UJ ug/kg
470UJ ug/kg
470BUJ ug/kg
97UJ ug/kg
97UJ ug/kg
97UJ ug/kg
97UJ ug/kg
470UJ ug/kg
470UJ ug/kg
97UJ ug/kg
(Continued on next pag«)
-------
19-OCT-»7
09:25:23
Project: AMB-065A
Sanple No: 17 040510
Laboratory: RX
EPA Region I L«b M*nage*«pt 8yste»
Ssuple/Project An*lysis Results
PUQET SOUND SALMON CONTAMINATION STUDY
Begin Sanple Date: 17/01/17 09:30 Source: Pish Tissue
Description: EVERETT HARBOR, PIN TAG 10562
Coinent: B/N/A DETECTION LIMITS ARE ESTIMATED
Otficar: DTE
Daptbi
Account! AMLBJr
QA Cods I
| Acid Extract Scan Tissue
I ••• Continued •••
| Paranatar Result Units
2,4-Diaethylphenol
4-MathyIpbenol
Pbenol
2,4-Dicblorophenol
4,«-Dinitro-2-aethylphe
Spike DS-Phenol
spike 2-Pluoropbenol
97UJ ug/kg
97UJ ug/kg
•7UJ ug/kg
97UJ ug/kg
470UJ ug/kg
21% ug/kg
ug/kg
I Pest/pCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
Tissue
Result Units
4,4*-DDT
Chlordane
ganaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4--DDD
4,4'-DDE
Haptacblor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Haxachlorobansene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
bata-BHC
delta-BHC
alpba-Endoaulfan
Spika Haxabroeiobensena
Haptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Gndrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 12<0
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1212
PCB - 1241
PCB - 101C
beta-Endosulfan
PCB - 1242
5 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
17
1U
1U
1U
1U
1U
1U
1U
1U
119%
1U
1U
1U
JOU
10U
99
10U
10U
10U
10U
1U
10U
ug/kg
ug/kg
«9/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
«g/k9
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
(S«npla Coaplata)
-------
l>roj«ett AJM-OCSA
Station No: 10791
Sample Mo: 67 040520
Laboratory: RX
SOUND >AI.MOH CONTAMINATION CTUOX
Begin Sample Data: 87/01/17 : Source: Pith Tissue
Description: POINT MO POINT, TAG 10719
o((io«ri Oft
Depth:
Aooountt AMbB3P
QA Cod«:
| Metals - Specified
j Paraaete r
Arsenic As-Tiss
Nickel Ni-Tiss
AntiBony Sb-Tiss
Silver Ag-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
ChroaiuB Cr-Tiss
CadBium Cd-Tiss
| Organics - General
1 Parameter
•j, Fat Hex Extr
l
"^ | Pest/PCB - PP Scan
| Parameter
4 ,4 '-DOT
Chlordane
gamna-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4 ,4 '-ODD
4 , 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobencene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endo sultan
Spike Hexabromobensene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
Tissue | | Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue |
Result Units j j ••• Continued ••• |
0.23 mg/kg-wt PCB - 1232 10U ug/kg
0.01U ag/kg-wt PCB - 124S 100 ug/kg
0.002U Bg/kg-wt PCB - 1016 100 ug/kg
0.041 ag/kg-wt beta-Gndosulf an 1U ug/kg
0.01U «g/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
0.66 ag/kg-wt
4.0 ag/kg-ut
0.05 Bg/kg-wt
0.010 Mg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
6.05 Percent
Tisiue |
Result Units j
10M ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
12 ug/kg
36 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
IN ug/kg
1U ug/kg
5 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
47 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Sample Co»pl«t«>
-------
19-OCT-a7
09:25:23
Pcoject: AMB-06SA
Station No: 10674
Sample No: 87 040521
Laboratory: RX
| Metala - Specified
I Parameter
Arsenic As ~T i V s
Nickel Ni-Tiss
Antiaony Sb-Tiss
Silver Ag-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tias
Zinc Zn-Tiss
ChroaiuB Cr-Tias
CadaiuB Cd-Tiss
| Organics - General
j Parasieter
> Pat Hex Extr
i
t— '
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4 , 4 '-DDE
Haptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobensene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spike Haxabroaobensene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
iPA Region X Lab Management lystea
Sasjple/Pro ject Analysis Result*
POOET SOUND SALMON CONTAMIHATION STUDY
Begin Sastple Date: 87/01/17 : Source: Piah Tiaaue
Description: POINT NO POINT, TAG 10674
Tissue | | Peat/PCB - PP Scan Tissue |
Result Units j j ••• Continued ••• j
0.27 ig/kg-wt PCB - 1232 10U ug/kg
0.01U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1248 10O ug/kg
0.002U »g/kg-wt PCB - 1016 10U ug/kg
0.022 ig/kg-wt beta-Endosul f an 1U ug/kg
0.01U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
0.99 ag/kg-wt
1.8 ag/kg-wt
0.01U ag/kg-wt
0.011 »g/kg-wt
Tissue |
Reault Unite j
0.103 Percent
Tissue |
Result Units j
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
102% ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
16 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2F
Depth:
QA Code:
(S*»pl« Coaplnte)
-------
»u0(r »ount>
c0wyAw****ioa «TUDY
Station No: 107(2
Saapla Ho: 87 040522
Laboratory: RX
Bagin Saapla Data: (7/01/17 : lourca: Fi»h Ticaua
Datcription: POIHT HO POINT, TAG 107(2
Q«fM»F> OTP
Dapth:
JtMMUF
QA Coda;
| Matalc - Spacitiad
1 Paraaatar
Arcanic A*— Ti*c
Hickal Hi-Ti**
Antiaony Sb-Tica
Silvar Ag-Ticc
Narcury Hg-Tic*
Laad Pb-Ti**
Coppar Cu-Ti**
Zinc In-tiaa
Chroaiua Cr-Ti**
Cadaiua Cd-Ti**
| organic* - Ganaral
| Paraaatar
Fat Max Extr
| Pa*t/PCB - PP Scan
j Paraaatar
4.4--DDT
Chlordana
gaaaa-BHC (Lindana)
Oialdrin
Endrin
Hathoxychlor
4 , 4--DDD
4 , 4 '-DOE
Haptachlor
Haxachlorobutadiana
Haxachlorobanzana
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
bata-BHC
dalta-BHC
alpha-Endosulf an
Spika Haxabroaobanivna
Haptachlor apoxida
EndoauKan aulfata
Endrin aldahyda
Toxaphana
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
Ticiua | | Pa*t/PCB - PP Scan Ticaua |
Racult Unit* j | *•* Continuad **• j
0.19 ag/kg-wt PCB - 12)2 10U ug/kg
0.01U ag/kg-wt PCB - 124( 10U ug/kg
0.002U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1016 10U ug/kg
0.049 ag/kg-wt bata-Endosul f an 1U ug/kg
0.01U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
0.72 ag/kg-wt
3.9 ag/kg-wt
0.01 ag/kg-wt
0.004 ag/kg-wt
Ticcua |
Racult Unit* j
1.89 Parcant
Ticcua |
Racult Unit* j
5 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
HAR ug/kg
9 ug/kg
20 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
(1% ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
46 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Sainpla Complata]
-------
19-OCT-87
09:25:23
Project: AMB-06SA
Station No: 10760
Sample No: 17 040523
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
.
Ar**nlc AS-TAS*
Nickel Ni-Tiss
Antimony Sb-Tiss
Silver Ag-Tis*
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tis*
Zinc Zn-Tiss
Chromium Cr-Tiss
Cadmium Cd-Tiss
| Organic* - General
j Parameter
3» Pat Hex Extr
ro
| Pe*t/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4 ,4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychloc
4, 4 '-ODD
4 ,4' -DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spike Hexabromobensene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulCtte
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
EPA
Region X Lab Management System
Sample/Project Analysis Result*
Begin Sample Date:
Description:
Tissue
Result Unit*
0.66 mg/kg—wt
0.29 mg/kg-wt
0.01U mg/kg-wt
0.002U mg/kg-wt
0.029 mg/kg-wt
O.Olu mg/kg-wt
O.S4 mg/kg-wt
3.5 mg/kg-wt
0.04 mg/kg-wt
0.004 mg/kg-wt
Tissue
Result Unit*
2.89 Percent
Tissue
Result Unit*
10H ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
10M ug/kg
42 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
IN ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
93% ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
140 ug/kg
1QU ug/kg
PUCET SOUND SALMON CONTAMINATION STUDY
87/01/17 : Source: Pish Tissue
POINT NO POINT, TAO 10760
| | Pest/PCB - PP scan Tissue
j j ••• Continued •*•
1 Parameter Result Unit*
PCB - 1232 10U U9/H
PCB - 1248 10U «g/*fl
PCB - 1016 10U ug/kg
beta-Endosulfan 1U ug/kg
PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
1
1
1
Pag* a
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2F
Depth:
QA Cod*:
(Sonpla Co»pl«t«!
-------
s AMB~0«»A
Station Ho: 10(02
SaBple No: «7 040524
Laboratory: RX
• UflBT HOUBD *A(,MaH
*TUO»
Begin Saaple Date: 17/01/17 : Source: Pish Tissue
Description: POINT HO POINT, TAG 10802
Depth:
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
| Paraaeter
Arsenic As— Tiss
Nickel Ni-Tiss
AntiBony Sb-Tiss
Silver Ag-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
ChroBiuB Cr-Tiss
CadaiuB Cd-Tiss
| Organic* - General
j Paraaeter
3» fat Hex Extr
l
ro
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4,4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaBBa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4 '-ODD
4,4'-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobeniene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spike HexabroBobencene
Heptachlor epoxide
EndosuKan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
Tissue |
Result Units j
.
O.SS Bg/kg-wt
0.01U Bg/kg-wt
0.002U Bg/kg-wt
0.037 Bg/kg-wt
0.01U Bg/kg-wt
0.54 Bg/kg-wt
3.< Bg/kg-wt
0.01 Bg/kg-wt
0.003 Bg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
1.11 Percent
Tissue |
Result Units j
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
6 ug/kg
35 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
1 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
2 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
IU ug/kg
lu ug/kg
IU ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
38 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue
1 '*• Continued •••
| Parameter Result Units
PCB - 1232 10U ug/kg
PCB - 1248 10U ug/kg
PCB - 1016 10U ug/kg
beta-Endosulf an IU ug/kg
PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
(Sanpla Cooplete)
-------
19-OCT-I7
09:25:23
Project: AMB-065A
Station Ho: 10753
Saapla No: 67 040525
Laboratory: RX
| Matali - Specified
j ParaB«t«[
A i* • A n i. c AM «»¥ i. • •
A ft • • H A W **»**»»
Nickal Hi-Tits
AntiBony Sb-Tias
Silver Ag-Ti**
Mercury Hg-Tiai
Lead Pb-Tiaa
Copper Cu-Tita
Zinc Zn-Tiaa
ChroBiuB Cr-Ti»»
C*d»iu» Cd-Ti«»
| ocqcnict - 0«n«r*l
j P*r*m«t«c
f. Fit H«x Extr
ro
ro
| P«st/PCB - PP Scan
j P«r«>«t«r
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordan*
9«BBt-BHC (Lindan*)
Dicldcin
Endrin
H«thoxychlor
4 , 4 '-ODD
4 ,4 '-DDE
Hcptachlor
H«xachlorobut*di*n*
H«x«chlorob«nx«n*
Aldcin
alpba-BHC
bata-BHC
d»lt*-BHC
•Ipha-Endosultan
Spik* H«x»bro»ob»ni«n«
H*pt*chlor cpoxid*
Endosulfan sulfat*
Endrin ald«hyd«
Toxaphcn*
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
BPA Region X Lab
f«*pl«/Pro j«ct
PUGET SOUND
••9in Saapl* Dat«: 67/01/17 :
Nan«g«B*nt syitaa
Analyii* Ratults
•ALNON CONTAHINATION «TUDV
Sourca: Pish Ti»»u»
Daicription: POINT NO POINT, TAG 107S3
Tii»u« | | P«gt/PCB
•••ult Unit* | |
1.00 «g/k9-wt PCB - 1232
0.01U «9/k9-wt PCB - 1246
0.0020 «9/k9-wt PCB - 101C
- PP Scan Tii«u«
•*• Continued ••*
tt « • 11 1 l> llni^Bi
• • » u * v unnv
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
0.024 «9/k9-wt b«ta-Endot ulf an 1U ug/kg
0.01U •9/kq-wt PCB - 1242
0.72 «9/k9-wt
3.9 B9/k9-wt
0.01U B9/k9-wt
0.014 B9/k9-wt
Tii«u« |
•••ult unit* j
0.71 P«rc«nt
Tiaau* |
•••ult Unit* j
1U U9/k9
1U U9/k9
1U U9/k9
1U u9/k9
1U u9/k9
MAR U9/k9
1U u9/k9
5 u9/k9
1U u9/k9
MAR U9/k9
1H ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
93% ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
16 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
Paga 10
Odfictr: DTB Account: AML92f
Dapth:
QA Cod*:
(Saapla Co«pl«t«)
-------
«» «a*i*»
Projvotz AMB-e«S*
•tation Ho: 10792
SaBpl* Ho: »7 040S26
Laboratory: HX
MOST
«AX.IIO» COV*AJfXH**XOH >TI>OT
B*gin SaBpl* Oat*: S7/01/17 : Source: rich Tissue
Description: POINT MO POIaT. TAG 10793
fl*
| Metals - Specified
j Paraaeter
Nickel Ni-Tiss
AntiBony Sb-Ti*s
Silver Ag-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
ChroBiuB Cr-Tiss
CadBiuB Cd-Tiss
| Organics - General
| Paraaater
> Fat Hex Extr
1
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
| Paraaeter
4 ,4'-DDT
Chlordane
gaaBa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endr in
Methoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-ODE
Ueptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BUC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spike HaxabroBobenzane
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulcata
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
Tissue | | Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue |
Result units j j ••• Continued ••* j
0.42 Bg/kg-wt PCB - 1232 10U ug/kg
0.01U Bg/kg-wt PCB - 124» 10U ug/kg
0.002U Bg/kg-wt PCB - 1016 10U ug/kg
0.035 Bg/kg-wt beta-Endosulf an lu ug/kg
0.01U Bg/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
O.C9 Bg/kg-wt
3.4 Bg/kg-wt
0.01U Bg/kg-wt
0.00* Bg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.29 Percent
Tissue |
Result Units j
111 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
MAR ug/kg
1U ug/kg
7 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
83t ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
16 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Sanpl* Co»pl«t«)
-------
19-OCT-ll
09:25:21
Project: AMB-065A
Station Mo: ELLIOTT
Sample No: 67 0405)0
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
,
Arsenic As— Tiss
Nickel Ni-Tiss
Antimony Sb-Tiss
.Silver Ag-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Bine In-Tiss
Chromium Cr-Tiss
Cadmium Cd-Tisa
| Organics - General
j Parameter
rat Hex Extr
i
ro
•*»( Pest/PCB - PP Scan
1 Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychloc
4,4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobencene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spike Hexabromobenzene
Heptachloc epoxid*
Endosulfan aulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
EPA Region X Lab Management System
•ample/Project Analysis Results
PUQGT SOUND SALMON CONTAMINATION STODV
Begin Sample Date: 17/01/17 08:40 Source: rish Tissue
Description: TAG 10671
Tissue | | Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue |
Result Units j j *»• Continued •*• I
0.2( mg/kg-wt PCB - 1232 10O ug/kg
0.010 mg/kg-wt PCB - 1241 100 ug/kg
0.0020 mg/kg-wt PCB - 1016 10O ug/kg
0.040 mg/kg-wt beta-Endosulf an 1O ug/kg
0.010 mg/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10O ug/kg
l.Oi ag/kg-wt
S . 2 mg/kg-wt
0.05 mg/kg-wt
0.005 mg/kg-wt
Tissue I
Result Onits |
1.5C Percent
Tissue |
Result Units j
11 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
MAR ug/kg
27 ug/kg
11 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
HAS ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
96 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
Page 12
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2P
Depth:
QA Code:
(Sempl* Couplet*)
-------
Vrojvoti AMB-O«SA
Station No: ELLIOTT
Saaple No: «7 040531
Laboratory: RX
»Ua«T •OUKD SALMON COWTAMIBAVIOH STUDY
Source: rich Tissue
Begin Saaple Date: •7/01/17 06:40
Description: TAG 10729
Coaaent: B/N/A DETECTION LIMITS A» ESTIMATED
OCCle*ct DVB
Depth:
QA Code:
| M«t»lt - Specified
I Paraaeter
Tissue
Result Unita
Arsenic
nickel
Antiaony
Silv»r
Mercury
Lead
Copper
Zinc
Chroaiua
Cadaiua
As-Tiss
Ni-Tiss
Sb-Tiii
Ag-Tif•
Hg-Tiss
Pb-Tiss
Cu-Tii»
Zn-Tif«
Cr-Tiss
Cd-Tiss
I
ro
in
| Organic* - General
j P*raB«t*r
Fat
Hex Extr
| VOA - PP Scan (GCMS)
j Paraaeter
1.01 ag/kg-wt
0.11 ag/kg-wt
0.01U ag/kg-wt
0.002U ag/kg-wt
0.020 ag/kg-wt
0.01U ag/kg-wt
0.64 ag/kg-vt
4.5 ag/kg-wt
0.12 ag/kg-wt
0.005 ag/kg-Mt
| | VOA - PP Scan (GCMSI Tissue
I j •*• Continued •••
I Paraaatar Result Units
Tissue
Result Unita
NAR Percent
Tissue
Result Unita
Carbon Tetracbloride 14U
Acetone 360J
Chlorofora 14U
Benzene 14U
1 ,1,1-Trichloroethane 14U
Broaoaethane 28U
Chloroaethane 2(U
chloroethane 28U
Vinyl Chloride 2»U
Methylene chloride 13UJ
Carbon Disulfide 14U
Broaofora 14U
Broaodichloroaethane 14U
I , 1-Dichloroethane 14U
1 , 1-Dichloroethene 14U
1 , 2-Dichloropropane 14U
2-Butanone 12UJ
1 , 1 , 2-Trichloroethane 14U
Trichloroethene 14U
1 , 1 , 2, 2-Tetrachloroetha 28U
Total Xylenes 14U
Ethylbenzene 14U
Styrene 14U
1 , 2-Dichloroethane 14U
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
| | B/H Extract Scan Tissue
j j ••• Continued •**
j j Paraaeter Result Units
Vinyl Acetate 280 ug/kg
4-Methy1-2-Pentanone 28U ug/kg
Toluene 140 ug/kg
Chlorobenxene 14U ug/kg
2-Chloroethylvinylether 28U ug/kg
Dibroaochlotoaethane 14U ug/kg
Tetrachloroethene 14U ug/kg
trans-1,2-Dichloroethen 14U ug/kg
2-Hexanone 28U ug/kg
Spike D4-1,2-Dichloroet 136% ug/kg
Spike 1,4-BroBOfluorobe 75% ug/kg
Spike 08-Toluene 97% ug/kg
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 14U ug/kg
trans-1,3-Dichloroprope 14U ug/kg
| B/N Extract Scan
j Paraaeter
Tissue
Result Units
Benzol aIpyrene 74UJ ug/kg
Dibeniofa,h)anthracene 74UJ ug/kg
Benzo(a(anthracene 74UJ ug/kg
Hexachloroethane 74UJ ug/kg
Hexachlorocyclopentadie 74UJ ug/kg
laophorone 74UJ ug/kg
Acenaphthene 74UJ ug/kg
Diethylphthalate 74UJ ug/kg
Di-n-Butylphthalate 74UJ ug/kg
Phenanthrene 74UJ ug/kg
Butylbensylphthalate 74UJ ug/kg
N-Nitroaodiphenylaaine 74UJ ug/kg
Pluorene 74UJ ug/kg
Hexachlorobutadiene 74UJ ug/kg
2-Nitroaniline 340UJ ug/kg
Naphthalene 74UJ ug/kg
2-Methylnaphthalene 74UJ ug/kg
2-Chloronaphthalene 74UJ ug/kg
3,3'-Dichlorobensidine 1SOUJ ug/kg
1,2-Dichlorobencene 74UJ ug/kg
Nitrobenzene 74UJ ug/kg
3-Nitroaniline 360UJ ug/kg
4-Nitroaniline 360UJ ug/kg
4-Broaophenyl-phenyleth 74UJ ug/kg
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 14UJ ug/kg
4-Chloroaniline
bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Meth
bis(2-EthylhexylIPhthal
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate
Hexachlorobensene
Anthracene
1 ,2,4-Trichlorobensene
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
Pyrene
Diaethylphthalate
Dibancofuran
Banco(ghi)perylene
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benso(b)Cluoranthene
Benco(k)(luoranthene
Acenaphthylene
chrysene
1, 3-Dichlorobencene
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
N-Nitroso-di-n-Propylaa
Spike DIO-Pyrene
Spike DS-Nitrobensene
spike 2-Fluorobiphenyl
Spike D14-Terphenyl
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylet
bis(2-chloroisopropyl)E
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
91JB
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74UJ
74BUJ
88*
54%
76%
99%
74UJ
74UJ
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
| Acid Extract Scan
j Paraaeter
Tissue
Result Units
2,4-Dinitrophenol 340UJ ug/kg
4-Chloro-J-Methylphenol 70UJ ug/kg
Bensoic acid 340UJ ug/kg
Pentachlorophenol 340BUJ ug/kg
2 , 4,6-Trichlorophenol 70UJ ug/kg
2-Nitrophenol 70UJ ug/kg
2-Methylphenol 70UJ ug/kg
o-Chlorophenol 70UJ ug/kg
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 340UJ ug/kg
4-Mitrophenol 340UJ ug/kg
Benzyl Alcohol 70UJ ug/kg
(Continued on next
-------
19-OCT-87
09:25:23
Project: AMB-06SA
station Ho: ELLIOTT
Sasiple No: 87 040531
Laboratory: RX
EPA Region X Lab Management Sytten
Sa«ple/Project Analysis Results
PUOBT SOUND SALMON CONTAMINATION STUDY
Pag* 14
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2r
Source: Pish Tissue
I
ro
Begin Sasiple Date: 17/01/17 08:40
Description: TAO 10729
Co»«ent: B/N/A DETECTION LIMITS ARE ESTIMATED
Depth:
QA Code:
| Acid Extract Scan Tissue I
I **' Continued ••• |
j Parameter Result Units I
2, 4-Diaethylphenol
4-M*thylphenol
Phenol
2 , 4-Dichlorophenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-nethylphe
Spike D5-Phenol
Spike 2-Fluorophenol
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
ganna-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobensene
Aldrin
•Ipha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spike Hexabroaobensene
Heptachlor epoxide
EndosulCan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulf an
PCB - 1242
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
340UJ ug/kg
59% ug/kg
6<% ug/kg
Tissue
Result Units
IM ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
111 ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
IM ug/kg
7 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
IM ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
115% ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
35 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
-------
a»«*»»*»
*t»*»B._.« A«l
Station Ho: 1067*
Saaple Ho: 67 040532
Laboratory: RX
ruacx aouHB
co«§»x>«iit»»io» •TUDY
OCCiBVtl DVB Account > AML,B*r
Begin Sample Date: 17/01/24 : Source: Pish Tissue
Description: COMM BAY, FIH TAG 10678
Depth:
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
| Partaeter
Arsenic As— Tiss
Nickel Ni-Tiss
Antiaony Sb-Tiss
Silver Ag-Ti«i
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
Chroaiua Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| organics - General
j Parameter
Fat Hex Extr
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
| Paraaeter
4. 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Hethoxychlor
4 , 4 '-DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-En do sul fan
Spike HexabtOBobenzene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
Tissue | | Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue |
Result Units j j ••• Continued ••• j
0.03 ag/kg-wt PCB - 1232 10U ug/kg
0.01U ag/kg-wt pea - 124( 10U ug/kg
0.002U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1016 10U ug/kg
0.042 ag/kg-wt beta-Endotul f an 1U ug/kg
0.01U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
0.67 ag/kg-wt
4.0 ag/kg-wt
0.01U ag/kg-wt
0.006 ag/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.65 Percent
Tissue |
Result Units j
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
MAR ug/kg
1U ug/kg
11 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1M ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
•1% ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
57 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Sample Complete)
-------
19-OCT-I7
09:25:23
Project: AMB-065A
Station No: 1069*
Staple Mo: 17 040533
Laboratory: RX
BPA Region X Lab Management Systea
Saaple/Projoct Analytit Results
PUGET SOUHD SALHOM CONTAMINATION STUDY
••gin Saaple Date: «7/01/24 : Source: Fiih Tissue
Description: COMM RA* , PIN TAG 10691 (VOA)
Coaaent: B/B/A DETECTION LIMITS ARE ESTIMATED
Page 16
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2P
Depth:
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
I Paraaeter
| Organic* - General
So rat
Hex Extr
| VOA - PP Scan (QCMS)
j Paraaeter
Tissue
Result Units
I
Arsenic
Nickel
Antiaony
Silver
Mercury
Lead
Copper
Zinc
Chroaiua
Cadaiua
As-Tiss
Mi-Tin
Sb-Tiss
Ag-Tlss
Hg-Tiss
Pb-Tiss
Cu-Tiss
Zn-Tif •
Cr-Tiss
Cd-Ti«*
0.90 Bg/kg-wt
0.14 ag/kg-wt
0.01U Bg/kg-wt
0.002U «g/kg-wt
0.034 Bg/kg-wt
0.01U Bg/kg-wt
O.CC Bg/kg-wt
4.1 Bg/kg-wt
0.02 Bg/kg-wt
O.OOS Bg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Unit* I
3.60 Percent
Tissue
Result Units
Carbon Tet rtchlor ide
Acetone
Chlorofora
Benzene
1 , 1 , 1-Tr ichl o to« t h»n«
BroBOBethan*
Chloroaethane
Chloroethan*
Vinyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Carbon Disulfide
Broaofora
Broaodichlocoaethan*
1 , 1-Dichloroethane
1 , 1-Dichloroethene
1 , 2-Dichloropcopane
2-Butanone
1 , 1, 2-Trichloroathan*
Trichloroethene
1,1,2,2-Tetcachloroetha
Total Xylenes
Ethylbenzen*
Styrenc
I , 2-Di.chloro*th*ne
13U
49J
13U
13U
13U
25U
25U
2SU
2SU
6.2UJ
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
13U
16UJ
13U
13U
2SU
13U
13U
13U
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
| VOA - PP Scan (QCMS) Tiasue
I ••• Continued •*•
j Paraaeter Result Units
| | B/N Extract Scan Tissue I
j j ••• Continued '*" I
| | Paraaeter Result Units |
Vinyl Acetate
4-Me thy 1-2-Pent anone
Toluene
Chlorobentene
2-Chloroethyl viny lether
DibroBochloroBe thane
Tetrachloroethene
traas-l,2-Dichloroethen
2-Nexanono
Spike D4-l,2-Dicbloroet
Spike 1 , 4-BroBof luorobe
Spike Dl-Toluene
ci.«-L , 3,-Dlchloiopropene
trana-l,3-Dichlor0prope
| B/N Extract Scan
j Paraaeter
Benio(a)pyrene
Dibenso ( a, h ) anthracene
Benso(a)anthrac*n— Fluoranthene
| Benso (k)f luoranthen*
j Acenaphthylene
•— Ch ry sene
1 , 3-Dichloroben**ne
2,6-Dinitrotoluene
N-Nitroao-di-n-Propylaa
Spike DIO-Pyrene
Spike 05-Nitrobenzena
Spike 2-Pluorobiphanyl
Spike D14-Terph*nyl
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylet
bis(2-Chloroiiopropyl)E
| Acid Extract Scan
j Paraaeter
2 , 4-Dinitrophenol
4-Chloro-3-Methylph*nol
Benzole acid
Pentachlorophenol
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
2-Ni t rophenol
2-Methylphenol
o-chlorophenol
2,4,5-Trichlorophenoi
4-Wi t rophenol
OomzyA AicohoA
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
560UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70BUJ ug/kg
ttt ug/kg
63% ug/kg
95* ug/kg
99% ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
70UJ ug/kg
Tissue
Result Units
360UJ ug/kg
74UJ ug/kg
360UJ ug/kg
360BUJ ug/kg
74UJ ug/kg
74UJ ug/kg
T4UJ ug/kg
74UJ ug/kg
360UJ ug/kg
360UJ ug/kg
74WJ ug/kg
-------
AM>-0«SA
Station No: 1069*
Sa»ple Mo: 17 040533
Laboratory: RX
»UOBT *o««» •**>*»» COM
•»* i on BTUDX
• •gin Sample Date: 17/01/24 : Source: rich Tissue
Description: CONM BAX, PIN TAG 10698 (VOA)
Cosment: B/N/A DETECTION LIMITS ARE ESTIMATED
Depth:
QA Code
| Acid Extract Scan
Tissue |
| •»• Continued ••• |
j Parameter
2, 4-Di»ethylphenol
4-Methylphenol
Phenol
2,4-Dichlorophenol
4,6-Dinitro-2-aethylphe
Spike DS-Phenol
Spike 2-Fluorophenol
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
| Parameter
ja 4, 4 '-DDT
i Chlordane
£> gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldr in
Endrin
Nethoxychlor
4 ,4 '-ODD
4 ,4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobensene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spike Hexabrosiobensene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulf an
PCB - 1242
Result Units |
74UJ ug/kg
74UJ ug/kg
74UJ ug/kg
74UJ ug/kg
160UJ ug/kg
57% ug/kg
59% ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Units j
5 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
9 ug/kg
51 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
lu ug/kg
115% ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
210 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10U ug/kg
CoBplate)
-------
19-ocT-n
01:21:2}
Project: AHB-OtS*
Station Mo: 10690
Saapla Ho: «7 040534
Laboratory: BX
| Matala - Spacifiad
1 Paraaatar
Araanic Aa—Tiaa
Nickal Mi-Tiaa
Antiaony Sb-Tiaa
Silvar Ag-Tiaa
Marcury Hg-Tiaa
La*d Pb-Tiaa
Coppar Cu-Tiaa
Zinc Zn-Ti»»
Chroaiu* Cr-Ti*a
Cadmiua Cd-Ti§«
| Organic! - Oanaral
1 Pacaaatac
> Fat Max Bktr
i
CO
o
I Pait/PCB - PP Scan
j ParaMatar
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordana
gaaaa-BHC (Lindana)
Oialdrin
Endrin
Mathoxychlor
4 ,4'-DDO
4, 4 '-DDE
Uaptachloc
Haxachlorobutadiana
Haxachlorobansana
Aldrin
alpba-BHC
bata-BHC
dalta-BHC
alpha-En do tulfan
Spika HaxabroBobanian*
Haptachlor apoxida
Endoaulfan sulfata
Endrin aldahyda
Toxaphana
PCB - 12(0
PCS - 1254
PCB - 1221
• FA Mqlon X Lab Nan«g«imt «y»t«f
«»»pla/Projact An*ly«if RasuH*
PUOET SOUND SALNON CQWTAKIHATXOH STUOV
Ba«in Saapla Data: 17/01/24 : Sourca: riab Tiaaua
Daacription: CONM BAX. riH TAO 10690
Tiaaua | | Paat/PCB - tt Scan Tiaau* I
Ratult Units j j ••• Continued ••• j
0.01U •f/kf-Mt PCB - 1232 10U u«/k«
0.010 •o./kq-wt PCB - 1241 10U U$/k9
0.002U «9/k9-wt PCB - 101C 10U ug/kg
0,039 •g/kfl-vt bata-Endosulfan 1U ug/kg
0.01U >9/k4-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
0.79 •9/k9-wt
4.2 B9/k9-wt
0.07 «g/k9-wt
0.001 •9/k9-wt
Tiaaua |
•aault Unita |
1.60 Parcant
Titaua |
Raault Unita j
1M ug/kg
1U U9/k9
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
MAR ug/kg
IK ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1 ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
99% ug/kg
ID ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
JOU ug/kg
10U ug/kg
140 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
M
Qffictr: OTi A.cs«»«nt'
Oapth:
QA Coda:
-------
Froj»ctl AHB-O69A
Station Ho: 10692
Staple Ho: (7 0405J5
Laboratory: RX
VUOCT SOUND m*tMam COKXAMZMATIOH •TOOK
Begin Saaple Data: 67/01/24 : Source: rish Tissue
Description: COMH BAY, FIN TAG 10(92
Depth:
Account i AMX.»Zr
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
j Paraaeter
.
Arsenic As— Tiss
Nickel Hi-Tiss
Antiaony Sb-Tiss
Silver Ag-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
Chroaiua Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| Organics - General
1 Paraaeter
i Fat Hex Extr
CO
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Paraaeter
4. 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gsaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4 , 4 '-DDE
Haptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spike HexabroBobanzene
Heptachlor apoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyd*
Toxaphena
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
Tissue | | Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue |
Result Units j j ••• Continued *•• j
0.09 ag/kg-wt PCB - 1232 10O ug/kg
0.010 ag/kg-wt PCB - 1248 100 ug/kg
0.0020 ag/kg-wt PCB - 1016 10O ug/kg
0.052 ag/kg-wt beta-Endosulf an 10 ug/kg
0.010 ag/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
O.S4 ag/kg-wt
3.6° ag/kg-wt
0.03 ag/kg-wt
0.009 ag/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
3.37 Percent
Tissue I
Result units j
11 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
23 ug/kg
35 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
4 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
2 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
107% ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
160 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
(Sanpla Conplata)
-------
19-OCT-I7
09:25:23
Project: ANB-065A
Station Mo: 1061)
Sample No: 17 040536
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
Li*A*n4e JL>— Viee
ACBVn&C J*» — A A • »
Nickel Ni-Tiss
Antimony Sb-Tiss
Silver Ag-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Sine Sn-Tiss
Chromium Cr-Tiss
Cadmium Cd-Tiss
| Organic! - General
1 Parameter
2, Fat Hex Cxtr
i
1X1 | Pest/PCB - ft Scan
| Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Oieldrin
Endr in
Me thoxychlo r
4 , 4--DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-En do lulfan
Spike Hexabromobenzene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
•PA Region X Lab Management System
•ample/project Analysis Results
PUQET SOUND SALMON CONTAMINATION STUDY
Begin Sample Date: 17/01/24 : Source: Pish Tissue
Description: COMM BAY, FIN TAO 106*3
tissue | | Pest/PCB - PP Bean Tissue
Result Units j j ••* continued *••
0.01U mg/kg-wt PCS - 1232 10U ug/kg
O.Oltt mg/kg-wt PCB - 1241 10U ug/kg
0.002U mg/kg-wt PCB - 1016 10U ug/kg
0.051 mg/kg-wt beta-lndosulfan 1U ug/kg
0.01U mg/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
0.51 mg/kg-wt
3.1 mg/kg-wt
0.0 1U mg/kg-wt
0.001 mg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
1.45 Percent
Tissue |
Result Units j
22 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
HAR ug/kg
16 ug/kg
7 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
41* ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
61 ug/kg
10u ug/kg
I
1
1
19
Officer: DT$ Account:
Depth:
0> Cod*:
(SanpL* Conpl«t»l
-------
moamo
Station Hoi 1071J
Staple Ho: B7 040537
Laboratory: RX
Begin Staple Data: 17/03/11 : Source: fish Tissue
Description: LENGTH 27.0 CM, WT 259 0
oXlccri o*«
Depth:
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
j Paraaeter
Arsenic As— Tiss
Nickel tii-Tiss
Antiaony Sb-Tisi
Silver Ag-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
Chroaiua Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tin
| Organics - General
j Paraaeter
js Fat Hex Extr
U)
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Paraaeter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
qtaaa-BHC (Lindanel
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4,4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenxene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spike Hexabroaobenxene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
Tissue | | Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue |
Result Units | j •** continued ••• j
0.01U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1232 10U ug/kg
0.03 ag/kg-vt PCB - 124S 10U ug/kg
0.002U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1016 10U ug/kg
0.059 ag/kg-wt beta-Endoiulf an 1U ug/kg
0.01U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
0.63 ag/kg-wt
4.02 ag/kg-wt
0.10 ag/kg-wt
0.002U ag/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.47 Percent
Tissue |
Result Units j
4 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
3 ug/kg
9 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
110% ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
69 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Saaple Coaplete)
-------
19-OCT-I7
09:25:23
Project: AMB-06SA
Station No: 10727
Sample No: 17 040531
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
| Parameter
A. r A A n i c Aa—YiBB
A K • V u & w •»» •*••
Nickel Ni-Tisa
Antimony Sb-Tias
Silver Ag-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiaa
Lead Pb-Tiaa
Copper Cu-Tiaa
Zinc Zn-Tiss
Chromium Cr-Tiaa
Cadmium Cd-Tiss
| Organica - General
1 Parameter
ja Pat Hex Extr
i
jjj
** | Peit/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Metboxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobensene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpba-Endosulfan
Spike Hexabromobensene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
EPA Region X Lab
Sample/Project
PUGET SOUND
Begin Sample Date: 17/03/11
Deacription: LENGTH 31.2
Tissue | | Pest/pea
Result Units j j
0.01U mg/kg-wt PCB - 1232
0.02 mg/kg-wt PCB - 1241
0.002U mg/kg-wt PCB - 1016
Management System
Analyais Resulta
SALMON CONTAMINATION STUDY
Source: Pish Tissue
CM, WT 307 G (COHO)
- PP Scan Tissue
••• Continued •••
Remit Units
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
0.041 mg/kg-wt beta-Endosulf an 10 ug/kg
0.01U mg/kg-wt PCB - 1242
0.37 mg/kg-wt
4.09 mg/kg-wt
O.OB mg/kg-wt
O.OOS mg/kg-wt
Tiaaue |
Result Units j
0.51 Percent
Tissue |
Result Units j
21 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
22 ug/kg
29 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
130% ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
93 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
1QU ug/kg
Pag*
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2P
Depth:
QA Cod*:
(Scmpl* Complete)
-------
•••pie Mot S7 0405SO
Laboratory: RX
J» COMXJUfXMAXXOM •TUD1C
Source: rich Tiecue
Begin Sample Date: (7/03/04 t
Description: CHINOOK LQHT66.3 WQHT4790 QMS riMALC
Depth:
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
j Pacaaeter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Nickel Ni-Tiss
Antiaony Sb-Tiss
Silver Ag-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
Chroaiua Cr-Tias
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| Organics - General
j Paraaeter
Fat Hex Extr
J>
i | Pest/PCB - PP Scan
^ 1 Paraaeter
4. 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endr in
Methoxychlor
4 , 4'-DDD
4 , 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BBC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spike Hexabroaobeniene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endcin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
Tissue | | Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue |
Result Units j j *" Continued **• j
0.10 ag/kg-wt PCB - 1232 10U ug/kg
0.0? ag/kg-wt PCB - 124s 10U ug/kg
0.002U ag/kg-wt PCB - 1016 10U ug/kg
0.063 ag/kg-wt beta-Endoiul f an lu ug/kg
0.2 ag/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
0.40 ag/kg-wt
3.0 ag/kg-wt
0.01U ag/kg-wt
0.009 ag/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
1.45 Percent
Tissue |
Result Units j
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
31 ug/kg
34 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
7 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
< ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
63% ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
170 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Saaple Coaplete)
-------
19-OCT-87
09:25:23
Project: AMB-065A
Sa».pl* No: 17 040551
Laboratory: RX
EPA Region X Lab Management Systesi
Sample/Project Analysis Results
PUGET SOUND SALMON CONTAHINATION STUDY
Begin Sastple Date: «7/02/04 : Source: risk Tissue
Description: CHINOOK LOUT50.5 WOHT1640OHS MALE
Comment: B/N/A DETECTION LIMITS ARE ESTIMATED
Page 24
Officer: DTG Account: AMLB2F
Depth: Fat
i
Hex Extr
1.05 Percent
| B/N Extract Scan
j ParaBeter
Tissue
Result Units
Bensota)pyrane 370UJ ug/kg
Dibensota.hlanthracene J70UJ ug/kg
Benso(a)anthracene J70UJ ug/kg
Hexachloroethane J70UJ ug/kg
Hexachlorocyclopcntadie J70UJ ug/kg
Isophorone 370UJ ug/kg
Acenaphthene 370UJ ug/kg
Diethylphthalate 370BUJ ug/kg
Di-n-Butylphthalate 370UJ ug/kg
Phenanthrene 370UJ ug/kg
Butylbencylphthalate 370BUJ ug/kg
N-Nitrosodiphenylanine 370BUJ ug/kg
Pluorene 370UJ ug/kg
Hexacblorobutadiene 370UJ ug/kg
2-Nitroaniline 1IOOUJ ug/kg
Naphthalene 370UJ ug/kg
2-Methylnaphthal«ne 370UJ ug/kg
2-chloronaphthal«ne 370UJ ug/kg
3,3'-Dicblorobenzidine 740UJ ug/kg
1,2-Dichlorobenzene 370UJ ug/kg
Nitrobensene 370UJ ug/kg
3-Nitcoaniline 1800UJ ug/kg
4-Nitroaniline 1800UJ ug/kg
4-BroBophenyl-ph«nyUth 370UJ ug/kg
I B/N Extract Scan Tissue
j •*• Continued •*•
I Parameter Result Units
I | Acid Extract Scan Tissue
j j *•• Continued ••*
| | Parameter Result Units
1,4-Dichlorobtniena 370UJ ug/kg
4-Chloroaniline 370UJ ug/kg
bis(2-Chloroethyl)Ether 370UJ ug/kg
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)M«th 370UJ ug/kg
bis(2-Ethylhexyl )Phthal 64BJ ug/kg
Di-n-Octyl Phtbalate S40BJ ug/kg
Mexachlorobensene 170UJ ug/kg
Anthracene 370UJ ug/kg
1,2,4-Trichlorobensene 370UJ ug/kg
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 370UJ ug/kg
Pyrene 370UJ ug/kg
Distethylphthalate 170UJ ug/kg
Dibensofuran 370UJ ug/kg
Benso(ghi)perylene 370UJ ug/kg
Indenoll,2,3-cd)pyrene 370UJ ug/kg
Benso(b)fluoranthene 370UJ ug/kg
Pluoranthene 370UJ ug/kg
Benso(k)fluoranthene 370UJ ug/kg
Acenaphthylene 370UJ ug/kg
Chrysene 370UJ ug/kg
1,3-Dichlorobensene 370UJ ug/kg
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 170UJ ug/kg
N-Nitroso-di-n-Propylast 370UJ ug/kg
Spike DIO-Pyrene 97% ug/kg
Spike DS-Mitrobenien* 5»% ug/kg
Spike 2-Fluorobiphenyl 11% ug/kg
Spike D14-Terphenyl 10C% ug/kg
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylet 370UJ ug/kg
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl>E 370UJ ug/kg
| Acid Extract Scan
j Parameter
Tissue
Result Units
2,4-Dinitrophenol 720UJ ug/kg
4-Cbloro-3-Methylphenol 150UJ ug/kg
Bensoic acid 720UJ ug/kg
Pentachlorophenol 720BUJ ug/kg
2,4,C-Tricblorophenol 150UJ ug/kg
2-Nitropbenol 150UJ ug/kg
2-Metbylphenol 150UJ ug/kg
o-Chloropbenol 1SOUJ ug/kg
2,4,5-Trichloroph«nol 720UJ ug/kg
4-Nitroph«nol 720UJ ug/kg
Bensyl Alcohol 150UJ ug/kg
2,4-Diaethylphenol 150UJ ug/kg
4-Methylphenol 150UJ ug/kg
Phenol 150UJ ug/kg
2,4-Dichlorophenol 150UJ ug/kg
4,6-Dinitro-2-«etbylphe 720UJ ug/kg
Spike DS-Vhenol 45% ug/kg
Spike 2-Muorophenol 39% ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Paraaeter
Tissue
Result Units
4,4'-DDT 6 ug/kg
Cblordane 1C ug/kg
ga»«a-BHC (Lindane) 1U ug/kg
Dieldrin 1U ug/kg
Endrin 1U ug/kg
Methoxychlor HAR ug/kg
4,4'-DDD S ug/kg
4,4'-DDE 27 ug/kg
Heptachlor 1U ug/kg
Hexachlorobutadiene 1U ug/kg
Hexachlorobensene 1U ug/kg
Aldrin 1U ug/kg
alpha-BHC 1U ug/kg
beta-BHC 1U ug/kg
delta-BHC 1U ug/kg
alpha-Endosulfan 1U ug/kg
Spike He»abro»obensene 111% ug/kg
Heptachlor epoxide 1U ug/kg
Endosulfan sulfate 1U ug/kg
Endrin aldehyde lu ug/kg
Toxaphene 30U ug/kg
PCS - 1260 10U ug/kg
PCB - 1254 120 ug/kg
PCB - 1221 10U ug/kg
PCB - 1232 10U ug/kg
PCB - 1241 10U ug/kg
PCB - 1016 10U ug/kg
bata-Endosulfan 1U ug/kg
PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
Co«pl«t«)
-------
»»•*••*.< AMC-OCSA
•••pie Hot «7 040552
Laboratory: RX
*>tf4tS)V •OMNO •At.MQN COHVANINAVION STUD*
•gin BaBple Data: 17/02/04 : source: Fish Tissue
Description: CHINOOK LGHT49.t WOHT1180GMS MALE
Depth:
QA Codes
| Metals - Specified
| Parameter
, . .
Nickel Ni-Tiss
Antiaony Sb-Tiss
Silver Ag-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
Chroaiua Cr-Ti»»
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| Organics - Qeneral
| Parameter
Fat Hex Extr
i | Pest/PCB - PP Scan
^ j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endr in
Methoxychlor
4, 4'-DDD
4 ,4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Haxachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spike Hexabroaobenzene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
Tissue
Result
04
. v
o.osu
0.01
0.002U
0.032
O.OSU
0.13
3.2
0.06
0.003
Tissue
Result
0.14
Tissue
Result
1U
1U
1U
1U
1U
NAR
1U
8
lu
1U
1U
1U
1U
1U
1U
1U
NAR
1U
1U
1U
300
10U
29
10U
| | Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue |
Units | j ••• Continued ••• j
•g/kg-wt PCB - 1232 10U ug/kg
•g/kg-wt PCB - 1241 10U ug/kg
•g/kg-wt PCB - 1016 10U ug/kg
•g/kg-wt beta-Endosulf an lu ug/kg
•g/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
1
Units |
Percent
1
Units j
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
(Saaple Complete)
-------
19-OCT-I7
09:25:2)
Project: AHB-065A
Station Ho: 10707
Saapla Ho: 17 040553
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
j Paraaeter
JL r • • n i c Aa— TiaB
A A • W IB * i. ft 9 •»••
Nickel Hi-Tiss
AntiBony Sb-Tiss
Silver A9-Ti»i
Mercury Hg-Tii»
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiii
ChroBiuB Cr-Tit*
CadaiuB Cd-Ti»i
| Organict - General
j Parameter
•f rat Hex Extr
CO
oo _
| Peit/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaBBa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endr in
Nethoxychlor
4 , 4 '-DDD
4,4 '-ODE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hesachlorobeniene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-En do sul fan
Spike Hexabroaobcnsene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
•PA Region X Lab
Sample/Project
P008T SOUND
Begin Sanple Date: 17/02/04 :
Description! CHINOOK, riH
Tissue | | pest/PCB
Result Units j j
1.9 •a/ka-ut -—_—-—_-__
O.OSU Bg/kg-wt PCB - 1232
O.OC •g/kg-nt PCB - 1241
0.002U stg/kg-wt PCB - 1016
0.053 stg/kg-wt beta-Endos
0.09 sig/kg-wt PCB - 1242
O.CS ag/kg-Mt
3.4 M/kg-wt
0.03 ag/kg-wt
0.005 Bg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.11 Percent
Tissue |
Result Units j
5 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
HAR ug/kg
10 ug/kg
11 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
IN ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
107* ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
54 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
MansgeBsnt lystea
Analysis Results
SALMON COHTANINATZON STUDY
Source: fish Tissue
TAG 10707
- PP Scan Tissue
*•• Continued •**
Result Units
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
ulfan iu ug/kg
10U ug/kg
Pag*
Officer: DTK Account: AMLB2F
Depth:
QA Code:
-------
o»ia* > a*
Projects AN»-0«9*
Station Ho: 10667
Sa.pl. No: II 040554
Laboratory: a<
™"»««i Jlix" •*«*«* JJJi«!55*5"'»»»?»S55~
VUORT »OU*D •a.i.Noii coaia-HiuJkiioB s««o«
Begin Saaple Dete: «7/Q2/04 : Source: rish Tissue
Description: CJJIHOOK, FIB TAG 10661
acctc«rt
Depth:
0*
| Metals - Specified
| Parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Nickel Ni-Tiss
Antimony Sb-Tiss
Silver Ag-Ti»s
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tis*
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
ChroaiUB Cr-Tiss
CadBiuB Cd-Tiss
| Organics - General
j Parameter
^ fat Hex Extr
| Peat/PCB - PP Scan
| Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordana
gavBa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4 ,4'-ODO
4,4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenseae
Aldrin
alpha-BUC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha- Endo sultan
Spike Hexabroaobentene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 12S4
PCB - 1221
Tissu* 1
ftesult Unit* |
3.2 ag/kg-wt
0.10 mg/kg-wt
0.01 *g/kg-«t
0.002U sg/kg-ut
0.064 Bg/kg-wt
0.16 ag/kg-wt
0.21 ««/kg-wt
3.3 ag/kg-wt
0.05 «g/kg-wt
0.002U sig/kg-«t
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.11 Percent
Tissue 1
Result Units |
3 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10 ug/kg
NAB ug/kg
IN ug/kg
7 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
«3t ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
3QU ug/kg
100 ug/kg
19 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
I Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue
j •*• continued. •••
| Parameter Result Units
PCB - 1232 10U »»9/k9
PCB - 1248 10U ug/kg
PCB - 1016" 10" ug/kg
beta-Endosulfan IU ug/kg
-------
19-OCT-S7
09:25:23
Project: AMB-065A
Station No: 10691
Saaple No: <7 0405SS
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
j ParaBeter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Nickel Mi-Tits
AntiBony Sb-Tiss
Silver Ag-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Sine tn-Tiss
ChroBiuB Cr-Tiss
CadaiuB Cd-Ti*a
| Organic! - General
j ParaBeter
> Fat Hex Extr
o
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j ParaBeter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaBBa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Hepttchlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobeniene
Aldcin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-En do suit an
Spike Hexabroaob*nsene
Heptachlor epoxide
Endoiulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
EPA Region X Lab Managenent SysteB
Saaple/Pro ject Analysis Results
PUOET SOUND SALMON CONTAMINATION STUDY
Begin Saaple Date: 17/02/04 : Source: Pish Tissue
Description: CHINOOK, PIN TAO 10691
Tissue | | Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue
Result Units j | • •• Continued **•
O.OSU ag/kg-wt PCB - 1232 10U ug/kg
0.07 Bg/kg-wt PCB - 1241 10U ug/kg
0.002U ag/kg-wt PCB - 101C 10U ug/kg
O.OC7 ag/kg-wt beta-Endosulf an 1U ug/kg
0.0* ng/kg-wt PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
0.29 Bg/kg-wt
3.4 Bg/kg-wt
0.01 Bg/kg-wt
0.009 Bg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.073 Percent
Tissue |
Result Units j
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
9 ug/kg
I ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
IN ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
77% ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
41 ug/kg
IOU ug/kg
1
1
I
Page 28
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2P
Depth:
QA Cod*:
Co»pX«t«)
-------
o» i a » • a a
Project: AMB-O65A
Station Mo: 10944
Saaipla Ho: <7 040554
Laboratory: RX
BOUND aALHOM CONTAMINATION
OCf it
Lt AMI.B2F
Begin Saapla Data: (7/02/04 : Sourca: rish Tissua
Dascription: CHINOOK, FIN TAO 10944
Dapth:
QA Coda:
| Matal. - spacifiad
| Paraaatar
Arstnic As ~Ti s s
Nickal Ni-Tiss
Antimony Sb-Tiss
Silvar Ag-Tiss
Marcury Hg-Tiss
Laad Pb-Tiss
Coppar Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
Chroaiua Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| Organics - Qanaral
j Paraaatar
>. Fat Hax Extr
i
| Past/PCB - PP scan
j Paraaatar
4 , 4 '-DDT
chlordana
gaaaa-BHC (Lindana)
Dialdrin
Cndr in
Me thoxychlor
4 , 4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Haptachlor
Haxachlorobutadiana
Haxachlorobansana
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
bata-BHC
dalta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Spika Haxabroaobansana
Haptachlor apoxida
Endosulfan sulfata
Endrin aldahyda
Toxaphana
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
Tissua | | Past/PCB - ft Scan Tissu*
Rasult Ooits j j ••• Continuad •**
0.050 ag/kg-wt PCB - 1232 10O ug/kg
0.06 ag/kg-wt PCB - 124S 100 ug/kg
0.0020 ag/kg-wt PCB - 1016 10O ug/kg
0.044 ag/kg-wt bata-Endosulf an 10 ug/kg
0.13 ag/kg-wt PCB - 1242 100 ug/kg
0.36 ag/kg-wt
3.3 ag/kg-wt
0.010 ag/kg-wt
0.013 ag/kg-wt
Xissua |
Rasult Onits j
0.031 Farcant
Tissua |
Rasult onits j
2 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
4 ug/kg
6 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
90% ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1O ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
45 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
1
1
(Sanpla Co«plata)
-------
APPENDIX A-2
SHELLFISH DATA AND QA REVIEWS
A-42
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGION 10 LABORATORY
MANCHESTER. WASHINGTON 98353
5ftTo? M/S Lab October 5. 1987
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: Review - Puget Sound Shellfish Data
FROM: Joseph N. Blazevlch, Region 10 chemlstWAV?
Raleigh Farlow* Region 10 QA officer *
TO: File **
We have completed our review of Puget Sound shellfish tissue data.
This review covers samples 86320100 - 86320118. All results are judged
acceptable except as noted. The following comments should be considered
by the data user. Although sampling occurred In early August 1986, samples
were not received at the Manchester laboratory until September 1986.
METALS
Metals were analyzed using EPA Region 10 procedures for metals in
tissue samples. This method employs the determinative steps described in
EPA's "Methods for Chemical Analyses for Water and Haste Water".
Holding Times: All shellfish tissue samples were held frozen up
to three weeks from date of sampling to date of digestion. Although EPA
has not established holding times for metals In shellfish tissue, all samples
were analyzed within established water and soil holding time periods.
Blanks: All method blanks are acceptable. Mo metals were detected in
method blanks at or above the detection limits.
Spike Results: Matrix spike results fall within the Manchester laboratory
required range of 60 to 140 percent recovery for tissue and are acceptable.
This range is expanded for tissue compared to water and soil, which are 75 to
125 percent, due to the complexity of the matrix. Spike recovery data is
found in Table 1. Mo shellfish tissue standard reference material is
available and as a consequence none were analyzed.
TABLE 1 PERCENT RECOVERIES OF METALS IN SELECTED SPIKED TISSUES
(0.2 to 10 ppm)
Parameter spike 1 spike 2 spikeS
lead 91 a a
cadmium 101 a a
arsenic 95 a a
copper 101 a a
zinc 106 a a
mercury a 73 au
a = Sample was not analyzed for this analyte.
A-43
-------
All duplicate sample results for metals gave percent differences
less than 20 percent with the majority less than 15 percent. Results of
duplicate analyses are found In Table 2. Duplicate results meet the
Manchester laboratory required limit of less than 20 percent and are
considered acceptable. Method detection limits range from 0.001 ug/gm
for mercury to 0.01 ug/gm for all others.
TABLE 2 RESULTS OF DUPLICATE METAL ANALYSES (UG/GM)
Parameter run 1 run 2 % Difference
lead sample 1 0.26 0.26 0
2 0.26 0.22 17
cadmium sample 1 0.07 0.08 13
2 0.10 0.10 0
arsenic sample 1 3.3 3.3 0
2 1.6 1.7 7
zinc sample 1 16.5 17.0 3
2 12.2 13.1 7
mercury sample 1 0.016 0.016 0
2 0.014 0.016 13
PESTICIDES/PCB's
Pestlcldes/PCB's were analyzed using the EPA Region 10 procedure
for pestiddes/PCB's 1n tissue samples employing the determinative steps
found in method 608 using dual column confirmation and quantitatlon.
Holding Times: All shellfish tissues were held frozen up to six
weeksTroidate of collection until date of extraction. Although EPA has
not established holding times for pesticides/PCB's 1n shellfish tissues,
it is noted that established holding times for water and soil were exceeded
for this sample set.
Blanks: All method blanks are acceptable. No pesticides/PCB's were
detected at or above the detection limits of 0.001 to 0.01 ug/gm.
Spike Results; Surrogate, matrix and duplicate matrix spikes are
acceptable except for aldrin, alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, and lindane, which
gave recoveries outside the Manchester laboratory required range of 50 to
150 percent for spiked tissue samples. Any data or detection limits for
these compounds are considered estimates for this sample set. All percent
differences for pesticides in duplicate matrix spikes fall within the
Manchester laboratory limit of less than 50 percent and are considered
acceptable except for alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, delta-BHC and lindane. Matrix
and duplicate matrix spike recovery data with percent differences for
selected pesticides are found in Table 3. Pesticide/PCB's standard
reference materials for shellfish tissue are not available and as a
consequence were not analyzed.
A-44
-------
TABLE 3 PERCENT RECOVERIES OF SELECTED PESTICIDES IN SPIKED SHELLFISH (4-20ppb)
Compound run 1 run 2 * difference
aldrin 38 54 34.7
4,4'-ODT 120 128 6.5
4,4'-ODE 106 141 28.3
4,4'-DOD 116 149 24.9
heptachlor 53 62 15.7
delta-BHC 58 129 75.9*
alpha-BHC »100 »100 *
beta-BHC - 180 *
Hndane »100 67 *
surrogate 1 75 64 15.8
* » Severe Interference was found for these analytes.
Surrogate recoveries for samples, blanks and matrix spikes are
acceptable. A summary of pesticide surrogate and matrix spike results
Is found In Table 4. All spike pesticide values are included with the
matrix spike results except for alpha-HBC, beta-BHC and lindane.
TABLE 4 SUMMARY -PESTICIDE SURROGATE AND MATRIX SPIKE RESULTS *
Parameter mean(%) Std.Oev. RSD(%) Range N
surroqate 83.7 20.0 23.9 35-123 27
«atr?n?ikel 80.9 33.1 40.9 38-120 7
matrix spike 2 108.2 46.7 43.1 54-180 9
* = Initial surrogate results for samples 320100. 320104, 320108 and
blank BH6259TJ were low. Reanalysls of each produced acceptable surrogate
recoveries. Only the second run results are used.
PHA
PMA's were analyzed using the EPA Region 10 procedure for tissue with
cleanup and determinative steps found In EPA method 610. The PMA data is
considered acceptable for screening only, due to the lack of acceptable
spike data and unsubstantiated method detection limits.
Holding Times: All shellfish were held frozen up to two months from
date SrfoTTec^Sn1 until extraction. EPA has not established holding times
f°r ^anks" 'SVShoTblSks are acceptable. One blank, BN6259TJ. contained
SMirSK&s of pEnaXthrene (8 ug/kg) .anthracene (0.4J ug/kg) and chrysene
(8 ug/kg): These parameters are given the qualifier "B" for those samples
associated with this blank.
A-45
-------
Spike Results: Matrix and duplicate matrix spikes were spiked at too
low a level for the Interferences present 1n the samples. As a consequence,
no useable spike results were obtained. Replicate results provide some data
on precision even though data for phenanthrene and anthracene are questionable
due to the detection of these compounds at similar levels In one of two
method blanks. The replicate data with standard deviation and RSD's are
found 1n Table 5.
TABLE 5 RESULTS OF PNA REPLICATES IN SPIKED SHaiFISH
Compound Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Mean(UG/KG) Std.Oev. RSD(t)
phenanthrene 10B 20B 4B 11.3 8.1 71.3
anthracene 68 0.8B .4UB 2.4 3.1 130.2
fluoranthene 20 30 10 20 10 50
No standard reference material for shellfish was available and as a
consequence not analyzed.
A-46
-------
«TII*TKCH,IIMC.
,****•>• I- »1.»»'OI»«»
awv. STE 'DO
TO.
FROM.
INTEROFFICE MEMO
Project File, TC-3338-28. QA/QC
Lynne Kilpatrick-Howard
12/23/87
SUBJECT QA/QE Review of the Puget Sound Shellfish Data and the
Report Generated by Joseph N. Blazevich, U.S. EPA
Region X
My review of the Puget Sound shellfish data and the report generated by
Joseph N. Blazevich and Raleigh Farlow of U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region X has been completed. Unless noted otherwise, the
results and comments (Blazevich, J., 5 October 1987, personal communication)
by the U.S. EPA reviewer are judged acceptable.
The following database qualifiers were assigned to the Puget Sound
shellfish data submitted:
U - Undetected
J - Estimated value for one of the following reasons: compound
verified but not quantified because value exceeded the five-point
calibration curve, compound is tentatively identified, response
factor may be low, or the standard was not within the allowed 25
percent response factor difference
M - Compound verified below quantification limit
B * Compound detected in associated blank
S - Data may be used for screening purposes only
MAR - No analysis results
NAI - Not analyzed because of interference.
A-47
-------
HOLDING TIMES OF PESTICIDES/PCBS IN TISSUE
The reviewer reported that, "Although EPA has not established holding
times for pesticides/PCBs in shellfish tissues, it is noted that established
holding times for water and soil were exceeded..." (Blazevich, J., 5 October
1987, personal communication). The Puget Sound Estuary Program (PSEP)
{Tetra Tech 1986) recommends a maximum holding time for frozen tissue
samples of 6 mo. The 6-wk actual holding time for the samples is within
PSEP guidelines.
MATRIX SPIKE RESULTS OF PESTICIDES/PCBS IN TISSUE
The reviewer noted that "any data or detection limits for these
compounds [aldrin, alpha-BHC, beta-BHC, and lindane] are considered estimates
for this sample set" (Blazevich, J., 5 October 1987, personal communication).
None of these compounds were quantified in any sample at or above the
detection limit.
MATRIX SPIKE RESULTS OF POLYNUCLEAR AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS IN TISSUE
The U.S. EPA reviewer noted that the PNA data is "considered acceptable
for screening purposes only due to lack of acceptable spike data and
unsubstantiated method detection limits" (Blazevich, J., 5 October 1987,
personal communication). Therefore, the data qualifier S was assigned to
all PNA data.
REFERENCES
Blazevich, J. 5 October 1987. Personal Communication (memorandum to file,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region X Laboratory). U.S. EPA Region
X Laboratory, Manchester, WA. 4 pp.
Tetra Tech. 1986. Recommended protocols for measuring selected environ-
•ental variables in Puget Sound. Final Report. Prepared for Puget Sound
Estuary Program. Tetra Tech, Inc., Bellevue, WA.
A-48
-------
Station Ho: DP66
Saaple Ho: 86 320100
Laboratory: RX
--s--itz?m,s*i:xv KsiiZffsrs-s.ssxes-
VU0BT • OUBD •BBI.I.riaH BABVBST BVWD*
Begin Saapla Date: 86/08/04 10:20 Source: Shellfish Tiaaua
Description: NATIVE LITTLCMBCKS - DASH POINT
| Metal* - Specified
j Parameter
Arsenic As-Ti*s
Mercury Hg-Tis*
Lead Pb-Tis*
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tis*
CadBiuB Cd-Ttss
| Poly AroB Hydrocrbn
j Pacaaatec
Ben*o(a)pyrene
Di banco) a, h) anthracene
Banso(a)anthracane
Acenaphthane
f* Phenanthrene
Jj, Fluorene
10 Naphthalene
Anthracene
Pyrene
Banco (ghi)perylene
Indeno(l,2,3~cd)pyrene
Benso(b)fluoranthene
Pluoranthane
Benco(k)fluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Chrysene
| P*at/PCB - PP Scan
j Paraaeter
4,4' -DDT
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Mathoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4 , 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiane
Hexachlorobancane
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Tissue |
Result Unit* j
2.1 ag/kg-Mt
0.007 ag/kg-Mt
0.10 ag/kg-ut
1.4 ag/kg-Mt
11.4 ag/kg-wt
.42 ag/kg-Mt
Tissue |
Result Unit* j
2U ug/kg
•U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
200U ug/kg
5 ug/kg
30(1 ug/kg
140U ug/kg
1 ug/kg
20 ug/kg
8U ug/kg
4U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
0.4U ug/kg
200U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Units j
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.lM ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
Tissue |
j •*• continued •*• |
j Paraaeter
beta-BHC
dalta-BHC
alpha- Cndosulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Cndosulfan sulfata
tndrin aldehyde
Toxaphena
PCB - 12«0
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
beta-En do sulfan
PCB - 1242
Result Units |
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
3U ug/kg
3.4 ug/kg
l.OH ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
1U ug/kg
Depth:
QA Code;
(Sanpla Coaplete)
-------
19-OCT-87
09:25:23
Project: AMB-060A
Station No: DP67
Saaple Mo: 16 320101
Laboratory: RX
EPA Region X Lab Management System
Sastple/Pro joct Analysis Results
PUGET SOUND SHELLFISH HARVEST STUDY
Begin Saipla Data: 16/01/04 10:20 Source: Shellfish Tiitue
Description: MACOMA SP - DASH FOIHT
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
«_M_n4/> &••»¥!••
Arsenic AS-***»»
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tisa
Copper cu-Tiss
Bine In-Tiss
cadmium cd-Tiss
| Poly Aro» Hydrocrbn
| Parameter
Benso(a)pyrene
Dibenso ( a, h > anthracene
Benso(a)anthracene
Acenaphthene
3> Phenanthrene
^ Pluorene
O Naphthalene
Anthracene
Pyrene
Benso(ghi)perylene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benco(b)f luoranthene
Fluoranthene
Benso(k)fluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
chrysene
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4. 4 '-DDT
Chlordan*
ga»a-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Mathoxychlor
4 , 4 '-ODD
4,4'-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Tissue |
Result Units j
IS •d/ka— wt
• •» ^ v/ * Tt w»
0.032 M/kg-wt
1.63 ag/kg-wt
5.1 »g/kg-wt
32.3 sg/kg-wt
.17 Bg/kg-«t
Tissue |
Result Units j
2U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
5 ug/kg
200U ug/kg
2 ug/kg
30U ug/kg
130U ug/kg
0.4J ug/kg
20 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
4U ug/kg
2 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1 ug/kg
200U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.16 ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
Tissue
| ••• Continued •••
|D*PA«Bj*frA»* B»— .— .. t ^ tt A I •• «
if mf mmm^9t
beta-BUC
delta-sue
alpha-Bndoaulf an
Heptachlor epoxide
indotulfaa sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCS - 1260
PCB - 1234
PCB — 12)1
«VW AttAA
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulf an
PCB - 1242
•IWUAfc WHAVV
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
3U ug/kg
l.OM ug/kg
2.7 ug/kg
1 1I u a / k a
A U U*J/ •»T|
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
Pag* 2
Officer: DTE Account: A53B2P
Depth:
QA Code:
(Sample Complete)
-------
rcoj*eei AMB-OCOA
Station NO: PHI 31
Saaple Ho: »6 320102
Laboratory: RX
ruacT SOUHD •••t.i.rxea HAMVBJJT STUDY
Begin Sample Date: 86/08/04 10:35 Source: Shellfish Tissue
Description: PRIEST POINT PARK - NATIVE LITTLENECKS
Officeri Dim Account) A5»»ari
| Metals - specified
j Parameter
Arsenic As— Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiis
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc En-Tiss
CadaiuB Cd-Tiss
| Poly Aro» Hydrocrbn
j Parameter
Benzo ( a )py rene
Dibenzo ( a, h) anthracene
Benso(a)anthracene
Acenaphthene
•f3 Phenanthrene
in Fluorene
*— ' Naphthalene
Anthracene
Pyrene
Benzo(ghi)perylene
Indeno( l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Ben>o(b)fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Chrysene
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
| Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4'-DOD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Tissue |
Result Units j
2.5 Bg/kg— wt
0.012 Bg/kg-wt
0.01U ig/kg-wt
1.1 ag/kg-wt
15.6 «g/kg-wt
.46 ig/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
2U ug/kg
SU ug/kg
2U ug/kg
200U ug/kg
20 ug/kg
SOU ug/kg
140U ug/kg
0 . 8 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
8U ug/kg
4U ug/kg
2 ug/kg
30 ug/kg
0 . 4 J ug/kg
200U ug/kg
2 ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.1M ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.4 ug/kg
O.lu ug/kf
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
Tissue 1
j ••• Continued •*• j
(Parameter "" "' '' "
beta-BHC
delta-BBC
alpha- En do sultan
Heptachlor epoxide
Indosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Tox aphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
B/* b t 1 t f
FCB — 1421
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-En do sulfan
PCB - 1242
Jieiu.ii units |
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
3U ug/kg
3.2 ug/kg
4 . 0 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
Depth:
QA Code:
(Sanple Complete)
-------
in
ro
19-OCT-I7 SPA Region x Lab Management Syatem
00:21:23 Sample/project Analyaia Reaulta
Project: AMB-060A PUOBT SOUND SHELLFISH HARVEST STUDY
Station Ho: PR122
Sanple Ho: «6 120103 Begin Sanple Date: 16/01/04 10:15 Source: Shellfiah Tiaaue
Laboratory: BX
| Netala - Specified
j Parameter
A •* el A n 1 0 All ~¥ i • •
Aft • ••• * 6 Alt * * » »
Mercury Hg-Tiaa
Lead Pb-Tiaa
Copper Cu-Tiaa
Sine Sn-Tiaa
CadaiuB Cd-Tiaa
| Poly Area Hydrocrbn
j Parameter
Bento(a)pyrene
Dibenio( a, h) anthracene
Bento(a j anthracene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Pluorene
naphthalene
Anthracene
Pyrene
Benio(ghi )parylene
Indenol 1 , 2 , l-cd)pyrene
Bento (b)fluoranthene
Fluoranthen*
Ben«o(k)f luoranthene
Acenaphthylene
chryaene
| Peat/PCB - PP Scan
I Parameter
4 ,4* -DDT
Chlordane
ganaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Bndrin
Methoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4 ,4 '-DDK
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiena
Hexachlorobenicne
Aldrin
•lph*-BHC
Deacription: PRIBST POINT PARK -
Tiaaue |
Beault Unita j
2} BBA /•ttf«.U|-
• * HB^^H^™ *Wt
0.010 mg/kg-Mt
0.21 ag/kg-wt
1.1 mg/kg-Mt
14.9 mg/kg-Mt
.11 mg/kg-Mt
Tiaaue |
Beault Unita j
2U ug/kg
•U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
200U ug/kg
4 ug/kg
30U ug/kg
140U ug/kg
0.4U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
•U ug/kg
4U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
10 ug/kg
0.4U ug/kg
200U ug/kg
2J ug/kg
Tiaaue |
Reault Unita j
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
BAR ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
0.15 ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
BUTTER CLAMS
I Peat/PCB - PP Scan Tiaaue I
j • • •
1 reraBoter
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endoiulf an
Heptachlor epocide
Endoaulfan eulfate
Endrin aldehyde
PCB - 12CO
PCB - 12S4
PCB ~ 1221
PCB - 1212
PCB - 1241
PCB - 101C
beta-Kndoaulf an
PCB - 1242
Continued ••• I
maauit unica i
. 1U ug/kg
.1U ug/kg
.1U ug/kg
. 1U ug/kg
. 1U ug/kg
. 1U ug/kg
\ If at A t If A
ju U9/*»9
.7 ug/kg
.5 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
lu ug/kg
Page 4
Officer: DTK Account: A53B2F
Depth:
QA code:
(ScnpXo Co«pl»t«)
-------
Ci AHB-OCOA
Station Ho: PH123
Saaple No: 86 320104
Laboratory: RX
PUOBT «OUMD
BABVBS* CTUDY
OCCicvri OVE
Begin Saaple Date: 86/01/04 10:35 Source: Shellfish Tissue
Description: PRIEST POINT PARK - SAND CLAMS
| Metals - Specified
1 Paraaeter
Arsenic As— Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Ti«f
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| Poly AroB Hydrocrbn
1 Paraaeter
Benio(a)pyrene
Dibensola.htanthracene
Benco (a (anthracene
>, Acenaphthene
i Phenanthrene
i" Fluorene
Naphthalene
Anthracene
Pyren*
Benso (ghi Iperylene
Indeno (1,2,3-cdlpyrene
Benso (b)fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
Benso (k ) fluo ran then e
Acenaphthylene
Chrysene
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Paraaeter
4 ,4'-DDT
Chlordane
gaBBa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4 , 4--DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Tissue |
Result Units j
1.4 Bg/kg— wt
0.030 Bg/kg-wt
0.39 Bg/kg-wt
2.3 Bg/kg-wt
38.9 Bg/kg-wt
.08 Bg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
2U ug/kg
8U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
200U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
30U ug/kg
130U ug/kg
0.4U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
8U ug/kg
4U ug/kg
0.8 ug/kg
8 ug/kg
0.4J ug/kg
200U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Units j
0 . 1M ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
HAH ug/kg
0.1M ug/kg
0 . 1M ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue |
1
| Paraaeter
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Heptacblor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Indrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
bet a-Endo suit an
PCB - 1242
Continued •*• |
Result Units j
O.lU ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
3U ug/kg
3.1 ug/kg
8.6 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
O.lU ug/kg
1U ug/kg
Depth:
Account! AS1B2F
QA code:
(SaBple Conplete)
-------
•f
I
01
19-OCT-I7 EPA Region X Lab Management Systea
09:25:2) Sanple/Pco ject Analysis Results
Project: AMB-060A POQET SOUHD SHELLPISH HARVEST STUD*
Station Ho: MK35A
Sanple Ho: •« 320105 Begin Sanplo Date: 16/01/04 11:15 Source: Shellfish Tissue
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
tine In-Tiss
CadBiua Cd-Tiss
| Poly Arosi Hydrocrbn
j Parameter
Benio(a)pyrene
Dibensol a ,h (anthracene
Benso(a (anthracene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Pluorene
Naphthalene
Anthracene
Pyrene
Bonso(ghi tperylene
Indeno( 1 , 2 , 3-cd)pyreno
Benso(b)fluoranthene
Pluoranthene
Benso(k)fluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Chrysene
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
ganaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Henachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Description: MUKILTEO - LITTLENECKS
Tissue |
Result Units j
X » C •fl/kQ*vt
0.003 ag/kg-wt
0.01U ag/kg-vt
l.C »g/kg-¥t
14.9 Mg/kg-wt
.27 Bg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units |
2U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
300U ug/kg
4 ug/kg
30U ug/kg
1700 ug/kg
0.5J ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
50 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
7 ug/kg
0.50 ug/kg
3000 ug/kg
20 ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.1M ug/kg
0 . 10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.1M ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP scan Tissue 1
1 * * *
I» .
Parameter
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Bndosulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin Aldehyde
Toiaphene
PCB - 12(0
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCR - 1232
PCB - 124*
PCB - 101C
beta-Endoaulfan
PCR - 1242
Continued ••• j
Result Units I
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
30 ug/kg
3.0 ug/kg
3.4 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
Page
Officer; DTE Account: A53B2P
Depth:
QA Code:
-------
iiAitv*** mtao-*
ttmtioa mot BB1
Sa>pl* Ho: »6 320106
Laboratory: RX
Begin Saapl* Date: J6/08/05 : Source: BhellCieh Tissue
Description: BIRCH BAY - BUTTER CLAMS
| Metals - Specified
I Parameter
Arsenic As— Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tis*
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
Cadaiua cd-Tiss
| Poly Aroa Hydrocrbn
| Parameter
Benso(a Ipyrene
Dibenso( a, h) anthracene
Be n«o(a (anthracene
Acenaphthene
3a Phenanthrene
' Pluorene
££ Naphthalene
Anthracene
Pyrene
Benso(ghi)perylene
Ind*no(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benso(b)fluoranthene
riuoranthene
Benxo(k)fluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Chrysene
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4 ,4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Ueptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobencene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Tissue |
Result Units j
1 . 7 Kg/kg— wt
0.001 ag/kg-wt
0 .Olo sig/kg-wt
1.3 ag/kg-wt
13.3 ag/kg-ut
.14 ag/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
2U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
20 ug/kg
200U ug/kg
20 ug/kg
30U ug/kg
140U ug/kg
0.40 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
SO ug/kg
40 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
40 ug/kg
0.4U ug/kg
2000 ug/kg
20 ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Unite j
0.10 ug/kg
0 . 1O ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
O.io ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
O.IO ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Sea
1 * * *
'
beta-BBC
delta-BBC
alpha- Endosulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
(ndrin aldehyde
TO K A ftlivl* •
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB — 1251
•r V>B A * 4> A>
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
bet a -Endosulfan
PCB - 1242
n Tissue
Continued •••
R SB aX U 1 t
•\*J • U 4 V
0.1U
0.1U
0.1U
0.1U
0.1U
0.1U
311
i If
IU
IU
lu
lu
IU
IU
O.lU
lu
1
1
Uni t s |
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
Depth:
QA Cod*:
(Sample Complete)
-------
19-OCT-tl *** Region X Lab Hanage»ent Syite*
09:25:2) Sample/Project Analysis Results
Project: AMB-060A PUOET SOUND SHELLFISH HARVEST STUDY
Station No: BB2
Sample No: 86 320107 Begin Sasple Date: 86/01/05 : Source: Shellfish Tissue
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
.
Arsenic As— Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc In-Tiss
CadDiusi Cd-Tiss
| Poly Aros) Hydrocrbn
j Parameter
Benio(a Ipyrene
Dibenso( a, h) anthracene
Benso(a)anthracene
Acenaphthene
Phananthrene
i Fluorene
en Naphthalene
°* Anthracene
Pyrene
Bensofghi )perylene
Indenod ,2, 3-cd>pyrene
Benso(b)f luoranthene
Fluoranthene
Benso(k)fluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Chrysene
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j parameter
4 ,4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4,4'-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobensene
Aldrin
ilph*-BHC
Description: BIRCH BAY LITTLENECK
Tissue |
Result Units j
1 2 • /k
0.005 ng/kg-wt
0.01U Bg/kg-wt
1 . 0 ag/kg-wt
13.9 sg/kg-wt
.11 ig/kg-Mt
Tissue |
Result Units j
2U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
2U ug/kg
200U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
140U ug/kg
0.4U ug/kg
12U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
4U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
4U ug/kg
0.4U ug/kg
200U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.19 ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
CLAMS
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue
j • • »
1 Parameter
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endotulf an
Heptacblor epoiide
Indosulfan sulfate
Bndrin aldehyde
Toxsphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
be ta-Endo sultan
PCB - 1242
Continued •**
B A el 11 1 ^ tin i I* Bl
We*U4*> VH * V •
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
3U U9/K9
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
1
1
j
1
Paf» I
Officer: DTE Account: A53B2F
Depth:
QA Code:
(Sanple Complete)
-------
Station Ho: AP46
Sa«pla Mo: 86 320104
Laboratory: RX
Begin S»mfl» Data: «6/08/05 10:30 Source: Shellfish Tissue
Description: ALKI POINT NATIVE LITTLEHBCKS - A
End saapla Data: 56/06/05 11:30
i
in
| Metal* - Specified
I Parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Maccury Hg-Tiss
Lakd Pb-TiSS
Coppac Cu-Ti«»
Zinc Zn-Tiss
CadaUun Cd-Tiss
| Poly Arosi Hydrocrbn
| PacaBatac
Banco(a tpyrana
Dibanxa(a,h)anthr
• 3 B9/K9 *'
0.010 «9/kg-wt
0.01O »9/kg-wt
2.2 ag/kf-Mt
12.3 mg/kg-vt
.23 Mg/kg-wt
Titiua |
Raault Units j
2U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
300U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
170U ug/kg
O.SU ug/kg
15U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
5U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
5U ug/kg
0 . 5U ug/kg
300U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
Tissua |
Rasult Units j
0.1N ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
HAR ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
| Past/PCB - PP Sea
1
| •rftaCAMQCVa?
bata-BHC
dalta-BHC
alpha-Sndofulfan
Haptachlor apoxida
Endosulfan sulfata
Endrin aldabyda
Toxapnana
PCB - 1260
PCS - 1254
PCB — 1231
VW0 &A*A
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
bata-Endosulf an
PCB - 1242
n Tissua
Continued •••
Rasult
0.1U
0.1U
O.IU
O.IU
O.IU
O.IU
III
3 V
I. OH
2.0
lu
1U
1U
1U
0 .1U
1U
1
1
Units |
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
u o /It o
ug/"8
ug/kg
ug/kg
ua /ka
u»/ *»
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
Depth:
Coap:
QA Coda:
Preq:
ISanple Complete]
-------
19-QCX-81
Q9;2$:23
Projact: AWB-060A
Station Mo: AP46
SaBpla No: 86 320109
Laboratory: RX
ECA Ragion X Lab ManagaBant Sygtaa
facpla/projact Analy*ia Bjtaulta
PUQBT SQU*D SHBLLriSH HARVEST STUD*
Bagin SaBpla Data: 16/08/05 10:30 Sourca: Shallfiah Tiaaua
Description: ALKI POINT BUTTER - B
lod Saapla Data: 86/08/05 11:30
f*<39 IP
| Natala - Specified
j Paraaatar
Araanic Aa— Tiaa
Nareury Hg-Tiaa
Laad Pb-Tiaa
Copper Cu-Tiaa
Sine Sn-Tiaa
Cadaiua Cd-Tiaa
| Poly Aroa Hydrocrbn
j Paraaetar
Banco ( a tpyrana
Dibenio < a, h ) anthracene
IT Benso ( a ) anthricene
^ Acanaphthana
Oo Phenanthrene
Fluorana
Naphthalana
Anthracana
Pyran*
Banco(ghi tparylana
Indano(l,2 , 3-cd tpyrana
Banco (b)fluorantbena
Fluoranthana
Banco! ktfluoranthena
Acenapbthylene
Cbryaana
| Paat/PCB - PP Scan
j Paraaater
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordana
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dialdrin
Endrin
Hathoxychlor
4 ,4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Haptachloc
Hexachlorobutadiena
Haxachlocobanzane
Aldtin
alpha-BHC
Tiaaua |
Raault Unite j
0.008 ag/kg-wt
0.26 ag/kg-wt
5.4 ag/kg-wt
16.5 ag/kg-wt
.07 ag/kg-wt
Tiaaua |
Raault uaita j
20 ug/kg
80 ug/kg
20 ug/kg
2000 ug/kg
4 ug/kg
30U ug/kg
140U ug/kg
0.4U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
80 ug/kg
40 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
5 ug/kg
0.4U ug/kg
2000 ug/kg
20 ug/kg
Tiaaua I
Raault Unita j
0.3 ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.57 ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0 . 1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
| Paat/PCB - PP Sea
1 •"
| raraaatar
bata-BHC
delta-BBC
alpha-Endoaulf an
Haptacblor apoxida
Endoaulfan aulCata
tndrin aldehyde
*ftfilt • t%|% AM a>
a>OaVB»pBVaa>V
pea - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB — 1221
» *•• A • * A
PCB - 12)2
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Sndo sultan
PCB - 1242
n Tiaaua I
Continued ••• j
B • tlU I t Uf&eKel k
O.iu ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
3o ua/ka
«s* ***ff .•;§
2.2 ug/kg
3.9 ug/kg
lu ua/ka
• ** "*3i^ ™ »
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
1U ug/kg
OCficar: OTI!
Dapth:
Co»p:
QA Cod*t
Fcaq:
-------
*•*••>-«»*»•»
Station Ho: NK35B
Staple No: 86 120110
Laboratory: RX
**»>»»*
Begin Saapl* Date: (6/08/04 : Source: Shellfish Tissue
Description: MUKILTEO BUTTER CLAMS
CoBBent: SEE ALSO 186320118 MK35
I
11 *******
Depth:
QA Coda:
f*
\
en
10
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
Arsenic Ae— Ties
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tisa
CadBiuB Cd-Tiss
| Poly AroB Hydrocrbn
j Parameter
Banco ( a (pyrene
Dibenco ( a, hj anthracene
Banco(a)anthracene
Acenaphthena
Phenanthrene
Pluorene
Naphthalene
Anthracene
Pyrene
Banco (ghi)perylene
Indeno (1, 2 ,3-cd) pyrene
B*nso(b)fluoranthene
Pluoranthene
Benco(k)fluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Chrysene
| Pest/pCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Tissue
Result
x 0
0.004
0.06
1.9
13.7
.11
Tissue
Result
20
90
20
300U
20
30U
160U
0.4J
10U
90
40
10J
10
0.4J
300U
20
Tissue
Result
0.1M
0.1U
0.1U
0 . 1U
0.1U
NAR
0. 10
0.1M
0.10
0.1U
0 . 10
0. 10
0 . 10
1
Units j
Bg/kg-wt
Bg/kg-wt
mg/kg-wt
»g/kg-wt
Bg/kg-wt
1
Units |
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
1
Units j
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
wg/kci
| Pest/PCB - PP Sea
1
1 raraaecer
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-En do sulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
PCB - 1260
PCB - 12S4
nm — 1521
ITV.O A * « A
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-En do sulfan
PCB - 1242
n Tissue
Continued ••»
P aft • u 1 fr
Jlfl m U J> fc
0.1U
0.1U
0.1U
0.1U
0.1U
0 .10
30
2.0
1 .7
1 u
A w
1U
1U
1U
0. 1U
1U
Un 4 t •
wn x fc •
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
(Sarple Conplati)
-------
19-OCT-87
09:35:23
Project; AMB-Q60A
Station No: BC76
Saaple Mo: 16 320111
Laboratory: RX
EPA Region x Lab Management system
samplf/Project Analysis Msults
PUQET SPUHD SHELLFISH HARVEST STUDX
Begin Staple Date: 46/08/06 10:00 Source: Shellfish Tissue
Description: BURTON COUNTY PARK - BUTTER CLAMS
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
Arsenic As~*Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
CadaiuB Cd-Tis«
| Poly AroB Hydrocrbn
j Parameter
Benso ( a )pyrene
Dibenso(a,h)anthraceno
Benso(at anthracene
Acenaphthene
3> Phenanthrene
^ rluorene
O Naphthalene
Anthracene
Pyrene
Benio(ghi tperylene
Indenol 1,2, 3-cd)pyrene
Benso (b)f luoranthene
Pluoranthene
Benso(k) f luoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Chrysene
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gamaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Tissue |
Result Units j
A
0.016 mg/kg-Mt
0.57 mg/kg-wt
2.3 mg/kg-wt
13.9 mg/kg-wt
.08 mg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
2U ug/kg
8U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
200U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
30U ug/kg
140U ug/kg
0.4J ug/kg
10U ug/kg
8U ug/kg
4U ug/kg
U ug/kg
30 ug/kg
0.4J ug/kg
200U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.16 ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.35 ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0 . 1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0 . 1U ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Sea
1 **•
| srAsTAeltfctF
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-En do sultan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Vott A nil eB n •
aOBVyUVHW
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB — 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
PCB - 1242
n Tissue |
Continued *** I
Rttsult* Units 1
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0 .10 ug/kg
311 ua/ka
• w 1»Ti/ •**
2.4 ug/kg
4.1 ug/kg
lu ua/ka
• w •" i| / •" v
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
Officer: DTP
Depth:
A5JB2P
QA Coda:
(Sample Coi»pl»t»(
-------
Station No: BC77
Saaple No: 86 320112 Begin Saaple Date: 86/08/06 10:00 Source: Shellfish Tissue
Laboratory: RX Description: BURTON COUNTY PARK - MANILA CLANS
| Metals - Specified
| Paraaeter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tits
| Poly Aroa Hydrocrbn
| Paraaeter
Benzo ( a )pyrene
Dibenzo ( a, h) anthracene
Benzo(a) anthracene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Pluorene
Naphthalene
Anthracene
Pyrene
Benxo(ghi)perylene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
Benzo (b)fluoranthene
Pluoranthene
Benzo (k)fluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Chrysene
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
| Paraaeter
4 , 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4 , 4 '-ODD
4 ,4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Tissue |
Result Units j
3.1 ag/kg-wt
0.014 ag/kg-wt
0.01U ag/kg-wt
1.0 ag/kg-wt
14.8 ag/kg-wt
.29 ag/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
20 ug/kg
80 ug/kg
5 ug/kg
200U ug/kg
16 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
140U ug/kg
4J ug/kg
10 ug/kg
BU ug/kg
40 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
40 ug/kg
0.40 ug/kg
2000 ug/kg
8 ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Units j
0 . IN ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
0 . 10 ug/kg
0.35 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
| Peat/Pea - PP Scan Tissue |
1
| Paraaeter
beta-BBC
delta-BBC
alpha-Endosulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Indosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1232
PCB - 124*
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
PCB - 1242
Continued •*• |
Result Units j
0.1U ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
30 ug/kg
2.9 ug/kg
4 .0 ug/kg
1 It tf ft / V a
JL v ug/ K g
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
Depth:
QA Code:
(Sanple Coaplete)
-------
19-OCT-I7
09:35:33
Project: AMB-060A
Station Mo: BC78
Sampl* Ho: «6 320113
Laboratory: RX
EPA Region X Lab Management Syste*
Sasple/Proj*ct Analysis Results
PUQET SOUND SHELLFISH HARVEST STUDY
Begin Saapl* Dat*: 06/06/0< 10:00 Sourc*: Sh*llfish Tissu*
Description: BURTOH COUNTY PARK - LXTTLENICK CLAMS
I
I Metals - Specified
j Parameter
Arsenic As— Ties
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Sine Sn-Tiss
CadBiuB Cd-Tiss
| Poly AroB Hydrocrbn
j Parameter
B*nto( a )pyr*n*
Dibeasoj a, h) anthracene
Bensolaianthracene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
._ Fluorene
i Naphthalene
Cf> Anthracene
1X9 Pyrene
Bensotghi )perylene
Xndenod , 2 , J-cd )py r»n«
B*nso(b)Cluoranthene
Fluoranthene
B*nco(k)fluoranth«n*
Acenaphthylen*
Chrysen*
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4 '-ODD
4,4'-DD6
Heptachlor
Hexachlotobutadiene
H*xachlorob*nz«n*
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Tissu* |
Result units |
0.014 «g/kg-wt
0.01U ag/kg-wt
1.4 ag/Kg-wt
12.2 ag/kg-wt
.33 ag/kg-vt
Tissue |
Result Units j
2U ug/kg
•U ug/kg
20 ug/kg
2000 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
30U ug/fcg
1400 ug/kg
0.4J ug/kg
loo ug/kg
•U ug/kg
4U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
30 ug/kg
0.4U ug/kg
200U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Units I
0.10M ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
(JAR ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
0.1M ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Sea
1 '»•
| sr A it &••%••?
b*ta-BHC
d*lta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Heptachlor epoxid*
Endosultan sulfate
Indria aldehyde
Toxapheae
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
b*ta-Endo sultan
PCB - 1242
n Tissue
Continued •*•
&••%! \ t Un its
0.10 ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
.10 ug/kg
.10 ug/kg
.10 ug/kg
.10 ug/kg
in aq/ka
*" ***? ™TI
.1 ug/kg
.7 ug/kg
10 ua/ka
• ** '•»^ •* IP
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
0.10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
Pag*
Officer: DTE Account: A53B2F
Depth:
QA Cod*:
-------
Station Ho: BP86
Sanpla Ho: 16 320114
Laboratory: RX
»<*«** mouHO **t«s>t>rx«»V •*»?•••* »*OOT
igin Saapla Data: 86/08/06 11:45 Soucca: Shalltish Tisaua
Description: ROSS POINT BUTTER CLAMS
| Matals - Spacifiad
j Paraaiatar
Arsanic As-Tiss
Harcury Hg-Tiss
Laad Pb-Tiss
Coppar Cu-Tisa
Zinc zn-Tiss
Cadauua Cd-Tiss
| Poly Aro» Hydrocrbn
| Parasiatar
Banco ( a )pycana
Dibanxo(a ,h)antbracana
Benzo(a)anthracene
Acanaphthana
Phananthrana
Fluorana
Naphthalana
Anthracana
Pyrana
Banco (ghi)pacylana
Ind*no(l,2,3- cd) py cana
Benzo(b)fluor«nthene
Fluoranthana
Banco(k)fluocanthana
Acanaphthylana
Chrysana
| Pest/Pea - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4'-DOT
chlordana
g»a«a-BHC (Lindana)
Dialdrin
Endrin
Hathoxychlor
4 ,4 '-ODD
4 ,4 '-DOE
Haptachlor
Haxachlorobutadiana
Kaxachlorobancana
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Tissua |
Rasult Units j
4.9 »g/kg-«t
0.021 atg/kg-wt
0.20 sig/kg-wt
S.O stg/kg-wt
17.3 ag/kg-wt
.06 ag/kg-wt
Tissua |
Rasult Units j
2U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
2U ug/kg
200U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
30U ug/kg
140U ug/kg
t ug/kg
40 ug/kg
»u ug/kg
4U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
40 ug/kg
0.4U ug/kg
200U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
Tissua |
Rasult Units j
0.89 ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
0.64 ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.lu ug/kg
| Past/PCB - PP Scan
Tissue |
| ••* Continued ••• |
j Paraavatar
bata-BHC
dalta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Haptachlor apoxida
tndosulfan sulfata
Indrin aldahyda
Toxaphana
PCB - 12<0
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
bata-Endosulfan
PCB - 1242
Rasult Units |
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
3U ug/kg
13 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
Dapth:
Account 1
QA Coda:
(Saapla Coaplata)
-------
19-OCT-I7 EPA Region X Lab Management Syetea
09:25:2) SaMpla/Pro j*ct Analytic Beaults
Project: AMB-060A PUQET SOUND SHELLFISH HARVEST STUDY
Station No: RP«8
Saapl* No: 16 320115 B*gin Saaple Data: 86/08/06 11:45 Soucc*: Shellfiah Tittu*
Laboratory: RX
| N*tal« - Sp*ci(i*d
| Parameter
Ara*nic A«-Ti«»
Mercury HI -Tin
Lead Pb-Tiia
Copper Cu-Tisa
Zinc Jn-Tias
CadaiiuM Cd-Tiaa
| Poly Area Hydrocrbn
| Parameter
B*nioapb*n*
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
OCR — 1221
f \fU ~ A*AA
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
b*ta-Endoaulfan
PCB - 1242
Continued *••
Reiult Unit*
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
3U ug/kg
11 ug/kg
1.6 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
1
1
1
Pag* 16
01 licit: DTE Account: A53B2F
Depth:
QA Cod*:
Co«pl«t«)
-------
PT*
station No: BHJ.2
Saaple Ho: 86 320116 Begin Sample Date: 86/08/06 13:30 Source: Shellfish Tissue
Laboratory: RX Description: BURLY LAQOON BUTTER CLAMS
| Metals - Specified
j Paraaeter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
CadsuuH Cd~Tiss
| Poly Arosi Hydrocrbn
| Paraaeter
Benzo (a (pyrene
Dibenzot a, h) anthracene
Benzo(a)anthracene
Acenaphthene
3s Phenanthrene
O^ Fluo rene
CD Naphthalene
Anthracene
Pyrene
Benzo (ghi)perylene
Indeno(l,2,3-cd) pyrene
Benzo (b)fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Chrysene
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4 .4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gasi«a-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4 , 4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorobenzen*
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Tissue
Result
2 .4
0 .004
0.09
1.8
IS. 2
.09
Tissue
Result
2U
80
2U
200U
2J
300
130U
0.7
100
80
40
1U
4J
0 .40
200U
2U
Tissue
Result
0.1U
0.1U
0.1U
0.1U
0.1U
NAB
0. 1U
0.22
0 .10
0 .10
0.1U
0 . 1U
0 .10
1
units j
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-ut
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
1
Units j
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
1
Units |
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
Tissue |
J *** Continued ••* |
ID&rABisit'Ar n^«.»l»-tt«»ie.*» I
¥ m ( • ••• 1. • 17
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endoaulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Sndosulf an
PCB - 1242
•»• * u * w wu * b a |
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
30 ug/kg
3.4 ug/kg
3.8 ug/kg
1 (J ti?/ ^9
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
0.1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
Depth:
QA Code:
(Saaple Complete)
-------
Ot
19-OCT-87 EPA Region X Lab Management System
09:25:23 Sample/Project Analysis Results
Project: AMB-060A PUGET SOUND SHELLFISH HARVEST STUDY
Station Ho: PD678
Sample No: 86 320117 Begin Sample Date: 86/08/05 : Source: Shellfish Tissue
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
Cadmium Cd-Tiss
| Poly Arom Hydrocrbn
I Parameter
Benso(a )pyrene
Dibensoia , h) anthracene
Benso(a)anthracene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Fluorene
Naphthalene
Anthracene
Pyrene
Bens o(ghi Iperylene
Xndenod , 2 ,3-cd)pyrene
Benso(b)f luoranthene
Fluoranthene
Benso(k)Cluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Chrysene
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hexachlorobutadien*
Hexachlorobenzene
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
Description: BENT NOSE SUBSAMPLE
Tissue |
Result Units j
2.6 mg/kg-wt
0.031 mg/kg-wt
0.99 mg/kg-wt
12.4 mg/kg-wt
49.3 mg/kg-wt
.08 mg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
4U ug/kg
20U ug/kg
20 ug/kg
500U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
60U ug/kg
280U ug/kg
4 ug/kg
20U ug/kg
20U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
6 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
3 ug/kg
500U ug/kg
20 ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.2U ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
• 0.2U ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
0.65 ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
0 .211 ug/kg
- DASH POINT
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan Tissue
j • » •
| Par ems t e r
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-En do sultan
Heptachlor epoxide
Bndosulfan sulfate
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulf an
PCB - 1242
Continued ***
Rtsulfc Units
0.2U ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
£ II tia/ita
QU "»/**»
7 ug/kg
6 ug/kg
2U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
0.2U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
1
1
Officer: DTE Account: A53B2F
Depth:
QA Cod*:
(Staple Co>pl«t*)
-------
19-OCT-37
09:25:23
Project: AMB-060A
Station No: MK35
Saaple No: «6 32011*
Laboratory: RX
EPA Region .: Lub Nunageuat-.t Systea
Analysis Results
PUGET SOUND SHELLFISH HARVEST STUDY
Begin Saaple Date: S6/OS/06 12:45
Description: MUKXLTEO - BUTTER
Co»»ant: SEE ALSO 186320110 MK35B
Source: Shellfish Tissue
| Metals - Specified
| Paraaeter
Arsenic As — Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
CadBiuB Cd-Tiss
| Poly Area Hydrocrbn
j Parameter
Benzo (a )py rene
Dibenzo(a,h)anthracane
Benzo (a ) anthracene
Acenaphthene
Phenanthrene
Fluo rene
Naphthalene
Anthracene
Py rene
Benzo (ghi)perylene
Indenof 1 , 2 , 3-cd(pyrene
Benzo(b)fluoranthene
Fluoranthene
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
Acenaphthylene
Chrysene
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4 ,4 '-DDT
Chlordane
gaBBa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldr in
Endr in
Nethoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4 ,4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Hatachlorobutadien*
M«ftttiefci»t<*b»n*eMII
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.001 Bg/kg-wt
0.26 Bg/kg-wt
1 . t Bg/kg-wt
12.2 Bg/kg-wt
.10 Bg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
2U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
2U ug/kg
230U ug/kg
2 ug/kg
30U ug/kg
130U ug/kg
0.4J ug/kg
10U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
4U ug/kg
U ug/kg
« ug/kg
0.4J ug/kg
230U ug/kg
2U ug/kg
Tissue |
Result Units j
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
NAR ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
0.1H ug/kg
O.IU ug/kg
O.IU ua/ko.
o.iu ua/kaj
| Pest/PCB - PP Sea
1
I ir«ir»iBWtwr
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
alpha-Endosulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endoiulfan (ulfate
•ndrin aldehyde
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
PCB - 1242
n Tissue
Continued •**
• * • •• t fr
itesu i c
O.iu
0. IU
O.IU
O.IU
O.IU
O.IU
* tt
J U
2.8
2.9
1 ft
J. U
IU
IU
IU
o.iu
IU
1
1
tf-. 4 ^ _ •
un its 1
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
Psga 19
Officer: DTE Account: A53B2F
Depth:
QA Code:
-------
APPENDIX A-3
MACROALGAE DATA AND QA REVIEWS
A-68
-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
REGJON 10 LABORATORY
MANCHESTER, WASHINGTON 98353
REPLY TO
AnNOF M/S Lab October 19, 1987
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT*
' Review - Puget Sound Macroalgae Oata
FROM*
Joseph N. Blazevich, Region 10 chemis
Raleigh Farlo*—Jtegion 10 QA officer
T0: File
Vie have completed our review of Puget Sound macroalgae data. This
review covers samples 86261000 - 86261084. All results are judged acceptable
except as noted. The following comments should be considered by the data
reviewer.
METALS
Metals were analyzed using EPA Region 10 procedures for metals 1n tissue/
vegetation samples. This method employs the determinative steps described in
EPA's "Methods for Chemical Analyses for Water and Waste Water".
Holding Times: All macroalgae samples were held frozen after homogeniza-
tion up to five weeks from date of sampling to date of digestion. Although EPA
has not established holding times for tissue/vegetation, all samples were
analyzed within holding times established for soil/sediment by the CLP.
Blanks: All method blanks are acceptable. No metals were detected in
method blanks at or above detection limits.
Spike Results: Except for those of mercury, matrix spike results fall
within Manchester Laboratory range of acceptance of 60 to 140 percent for
tissue/vegetation and are acceptable. This range 1s expanded for tissue/vegeta-
tion compared to that for soil and water, which are 75 to 125 percent, due to
the complexity of the matrix. Spike recovery data is found in Table 1.
TABLE 1. PERCENT RECOVERIES OF METALS IN SELECTED SPIKED VEGETATION SAMPLES (%)
Z to 280 ug/Kg (ppbT
Parameter Spike 1 Spike 2 Spike 3 Spike 4 Spike 5 Mean Std.Dev. RSO
arsenic 102 86 116 108 73 97 ^ 17 17.8
cadmium a a a 101 71 86 * 35 *
zinc 102 101 92 97 77 94 10.1 10.9
mercury 58 58 63 3 64 49 26 53
copper 108 108 79 103 108 101 12.6 12.4
lead 104 114 95 111 96 104 8.6 8.2
chromium 104 100 103 89 115 102 9.3 9.1
a = spike level too low to quantify accurately.
* = percent difference rather than standard deviation is shown.
A-69
-------
Except for spike 4, the mercury recovery values are consistent but low.
Therefore, all mercury values are considered estimates and should be given
the qualifier "J". The mercury recovery value associated with spike 4, sample
261062, is unacceptable. As a consequence, the mercury value reported for that
sample is unacceptable and should be given the qualifier "R".
Except for mercury and cadmium, the precision for these results meet the
Manchester Laboratory required limit of less than 20 percent and are acceptable.
If one rejects the mercury result of spike 4 as an outlier, the precision of the
mercury recovery results becomes acceptable.
Instrument performance was checked using three aqueous reference materials
containing one or more of the target metals. The results of these analyses are
found in Table 2. All are acceptable. Method detection limits range from
TABLE 2. REFERENCE MATERIAL SAMPLE RECOVERIES (%)
(0.0065 to 0.893 ug/ ST}
Metal UP16#1 WP16I2 WP15I1 HS17I1 WS17I2
arsenic 97 100 a 95 a
cadmium 96 102 a 98 104
zinc 100 108 a a a
copper 98 97 108 a a
lead 102 a a a a
chromium 101 102 a a a
a - sample not analyzed for this analyte.
0.001 ug/gm for mercury and 0.1 ug/gm for cadmium to 1 ug/gm for all others.
PESTICIDES/PCBs
Pesticides/PCBs were analyzed using the EPA Region 10 procedure for
pesticides/PCBs in tissue/vegetation samples employing the determinative steps
found in method 608 using dual column confirmation and quantitation.
Holding Times: All macroalgae samples were held two days at 4°C before
extraction. Although EPA has not established holding times for pesticides/PCBs
in vegetation and tissues samples, it is noted that established holding times
for water and soil /sediment were not exceeded for this sample set.
Blanks: All method blanks are acceptable. No pesticides/PCBs were
detected at or above method detection limits of 0.001 to 0.03 ug/gm (ppm).
Spike Results; Matrix spike results are acceptable for target pesticides.
Also, all surrogate recovery results are acceptable except for samples 261001,
261009, 261020, 261041, 261047, 261052 and 261065, which were, low due to loss
of sample during sample preparation. A summary of both matrix and surrogate
results is found in Table 3. Results for individual pesticides recoveries are
found in Table 4. Sample 261060 was not spiked with any pesticide surrogate.
Therefore, all pesticide values associated with this sample and those listed
above with low surrogate recoveries are considered estimates and should be given
the qualifier "J". Replicate spike analyses give RSDs less than 50 percent, the
Manchester Laboratory recommended limit, and are considered acceptable.
A-70
-------
TABLE 3. SUMMARY - PESTICIDE SURROGATE AND MATRIX SPIKE RESULTS
Parameter Mean(%) Std.Dev. RSD(%) N Range
Surrogate 1 89.5
Matrix spike 1 92.5
Matrix spike 2 75.1
Matrix spike 3 84.3
Matrix spike 4 88.6
Matrix spike 5 102.8
10.9
14.7
19.8
16.5
19.1
24.8
12.1
15.9
26.4
19.5
21.6
24.2
46
15
15
15
15
15
61-107
69-114
46-105
44-106
67-129
64-154
TABLE 4. PERCENT RECOVERIES OF SELECTED PESTICIDES IN SPIKED VEGETATION SAMPLES
4-20 ug/kg (ppb)
Spike 1 Spike 2 Spike 3 Spike 4 Spike 5 Mean(%) Std.Dev. RSD(%)
Compound
aldrin 105 78 94 74 93 89 12.7
dieldrin 72 62 90 100 81 81 14.9
4,4'-DOT 95 85 90 110 98 96 9.4
4,4'-DDE 95 94 106 129 103 105 14.2
4,4'-DDT 74 55 83 79 76 73 10.8
a-endosulfan 108 100 99 81 105 99 10.5
b-endosulfan 71 57 96 95 94 33 17.7
endrin 88 77 92 105 100 92 10.9
endrin aid. 69 52 44 69 64 60 11.1
heptachlor 100 46 89 73 89 79 21
heptachlor ep. 108 105 82 70 109 95 17.7
alpha-BHC 92 100 94 113 103 100 8.3
beta-BHC 98 82 62 89 154 97 34.5
lindane 98 82 62 87 154 93 37
delta-BHC 114 52 82 75 119 88 28
14.2
18.4
9.9
13.4
14.8
10.7
21.4
11.8
.7
.5
.7
18
26
18
8.3
35.6
40.1
31.7
PNAs
PNAs were analyzed using the Region 10 procedure for tissue/vegetation with
cleanup steps found in EPA method 610 and determinative steps found in the CLP
"Statement of Work for Organic Analysis", Rev 2/87. The PNA results are considered
acceptable for screening only, due to the lack of acceptable low level spike data
and unsubstantiated detection limits. All data was collected under an acceptable
GC/MS tune that meets DFTPP criteria.
Holding Tiroes: All macroalgae samples were held at 4°C up to three days
before extraction and analyzed within two months of extraction. EPA has not
established holding times for PNAs in macroalgae. •
Blanks: No PNAs were detected in either the blanks or samples at the
estimated detection limit of 7.5 ug/Kg. All PNA detection limits should be
^^SpikVResultsT Recoveries for PNAs and some related neutral compounds along
with piFcliht differences are found in Table 5. The results indicate low to
A-71
-------
moderate recoveries with good precision, less than 50 percent, for most target
wialytes. Only naphthalene and 2-chloronaphthalene gave a percent difference
greater than 50 percent.
TABLE 5. PERCENT RECOVERIES OF PNAs AND SELECTED COMPOUNDS IN MACROALGAE
(1.6 ug/gm)"
Parameter Run 1
naphthalene 52
2-methylnaphthalene 43
2-chloronaphthalene 31
acenaphthylene 51
acenaphthene 52
dibenzofuran 42
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether 31
f1uorene 53
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether 22
phenanthrene 45
anthracene 29
fluoranthene 54
pyrene 58
benzo(a)anthracene 49
chrysene 56
benzo(b or k)fluoranthene 55
benzola)pyrene 50
i ndeno(l ,2,3-cd) pyrene 57
dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 51
benzo(gh1)perylene 62
Run 2
26
33
17
49
45
47
37
58
25
45
25
58
64
52
65
61
56
64
45
67
Mean
39
38
24
50
48.5
44.5
34
55.5
23.5
45
27
56
61
50.5
60.5
58
53
60.5
48
64.5
% Diff.
66
26
56
4
14.4
11.2
17.6
9
6.4
0
14.8
7.1
9.8
5.9
14.9
10.3
11.3
11.6
12.5
7.8
Surrogate recoveries for the six samples, two blanks and two matrix spikes
are found in summary form In Table 6. Although EPA has not established acceptance
limits for tissue/vegetation surrogate recoveries, all surrogate recoveries fall
within EPA established surrogate limits for water and soil /sediment. Also
precision for the three surrogates is within 50 percent, the Manchester Laboratory
recommended acceptance limit. Since EPA has not established precision acceptance
limits for tissue/vegetation, this limit Is used as a guide only.
TABLE 6. SUMMARY OF SURROGATE SPIKE RECOVERY RESULTS
surrogate Mean(%) Std.Dev. RSO(t) N
2-f1uorobi phenyl 50
dlO-pyrene 75.5
d!4-terphenyl 62.6
15.7
24.3
14.1
31
32.2
22.6
10
10
10
A-72
-------
OTHER ACID/NEUTRAL ANALYTES
The remainder of the acid/neutral compounds were analyzed using the EPA
Region 10 procedure for tissue/vegetation. The method employs acetone extrac-
tion with a polytron high speed blender. The determinative steps outlined in
the CLP "Methods for Analysis of Organics", Rev 2/87 was used. All data was
collected under an acceptable tune that meets DFTPP criteria.
Holding Times: All samples were held frozen for up to one month before
extraction and analyzed within one month after extraction. EPA has not
established holding times for acid/neutral analytes in tissue/vegetation samples.
Blanks: No compounds were found in the blanks at or above estimated
detection limits except for di-n-butyl phthalate(65ng/gm), bis(2-ethylhexyl)
phthalate(130 ng/gm) and di-n-octyl phtha1ate(100ng/gm). di-n-Octyl phthalate
was detected in each sample. Since this analyte was also detected in the
blanks, these results should be given the qualifier "B". Also, benzyl alcohol
was detected in sample 86261081 and given the qualifier "J" since the value
fell outside the initial five point calibration curve. All detection limits are
derived from instrument detection limits and analytical parameters used during
the analysis and should be considered estimates. The qualifier "J" should be
given to all detection limits.
Spike Results: All samples were diluted such that only limited surrogate
recovery data was determined. Although acceptable surrogate recovery ranges
have not been established for macroalgae, the sample surrogate results obtained
were within the acceptance limits for soil/sediments. Except for phenol,
4-nitrophenol, dibenz(a,h)anthracene and benzo(g,h,i)perylene, spiked acid/neutral
analytes gave acceptable recoveries. Both phenol and 4-nitrophenol were not
detected in the matrix spikes. As a consequence, all phenol and 4-nitrophenol
data in the sample set should be given the qualifier "R". Since the two PNAs,
dibenz(a,h)anthracene and benzo(g,h,i)perylene, show unusually high recoveries,
results for these analytes for the sample set should be given the qualifier "J".
Spike recoveries are found in Table 7.
VOLATILES
Volatiles were analyzed using EPA Region 10 procedure for VOAs in tissue/
vegetation. The procedure employs heated purge and trap along with the
determinative steps found in the CLP "Statement of Work for Organic Analysis",
Rev 2/87. All VGA data was collected under an acceptable tune that meets BFB
criteria.
Holding Times: All macroalgae were held frozen up to two months until
analyzed. EPA has not established holding times for VOAs in tissue/vegetation.
However, holding times for water and solids, which maybe taken as guidelines
for tissue/vegetation, were exceeded. Consequently, all VOA results must be
given the qualifier "J" . .
Blanks: All blanks are acceptable. Only the common blank contaminates
methylene chloride, 2-butanone and acetone were found. All results for these
analytes should be given the qualifier "B".
Spike Results: VOA surrogate and matrix spike recoveries are acceptable
except for the following analytes. The recoveries of chloromethane, broroo-
methane, vinyl chloride and acetone are extremely high. All values reported
for each of these analytes should be given the qualifier J . A summary of
A-73
-------
TABLE 7. PERCENT RECOVERY RESULTS FOR ACID/NEUTRAL ANALYTES [4 ug/gm (ppmTI
Parameter
phenol
bis(2-chloroethyl) ether
2-chlorophenol
1,3-di chlorobenzene
1,4-di chlorobenzene
benzyl alcohol
1,2-di chlorobenzene
2-methy!phenol
bis(2-chloroisopropyl) ether
4-methylphenol
N-nitroso-di-n-propylami ne
hexachloroethane
nitrobenzene
i sophorone
2-nitrophenol
2,4-dimethylphenol
benzole acid
bi s(2-chloroethoxy Jmethane
dichlorophenol
1,2,4-trichlorobenzene
naphthalene
hexachlorobutadlene
4-chloro-3-roethylphenol
2-methylnaphtha!ene
hexachlorocyclopentadiene
2,4,6-trichlorophenol
2,4,5-trichlorophenol
2-chloronaphthalene
dimethyl phthalate
acenaphthylene
acenaphthene
2,4-dinitrophenol
4-nitrophenol
di benzofuran
2,4-dinitrotoluene
2,6-dinitrotoluene
diethyl phthalate
4-chlorophenyl phenyl ether
f1uorene
4,6-dinitro-2-methylphenol
4-bromophenyl phenyl ether
hexachlorobenzene
pentachlorophenol
phenanthrene
anthracene
di-n-butyl phthalate
fluoranthene
pyrene
butyl benzyl phthalate
benzo(a)anthracene
bi s(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
chrysene
di-n-octyl phthalate
benzo(b and k)fluoranthene
benzo(a)pyrene
indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
dibenz(a,hjanthracene
benzo(g,h,i)perylene
Spike 1
NO
89
76
68
69
100
71
89
79
90
85
47
73
79
75
120
90
82
75
64
88
46
86
83
26
94
60
76
88
94
81
46
NO
80
74
86
85
64
86
73
70
68
42
88
77
100
80
88
85
110
110
73
86
79
77
98
240
180
Spike 2
NO
70
63
54
56
82
59
73
69
73
62
38
57
65
62
100
71
66
60
56
81
43
73
70
31
78
49
64
71
86
77
15
NO
69
58
62
72
53
81
53
53
61
27
80
64
80
70
78
67
92
76
68
160
71
73
99
230
180
Mean
-
79.5
69.5
61
62.5
91
65
81
74
81.5
73.5
42.5
65
72
68.5
110
80.5
74
67.5
60
84.5
44.5
79.5
76.5
28.5
86
54.5
70
79.5
90
79
30.5
-
74.5
66
74
78.5
58.5
83.5
63
61.5
64.5
34.5
84
70.5
90
75
83
76
101
93
70.5
122.5
75
75
98.5
235
180
% diff .
-
23.9
18.7
23
20.8
19.8
18.5
19.8
13.5
20.9
31.3
21.2
24.6
19.4
19
18.2
23.6
21.6
22.2
13.3
8.3
6.7
16.4
17
17.5
18.6
20.2
17.1
20.1
8.9
5.1
101.6
-
14.8
24.2
32.4
16.6
18.8
6
31.7
27.6
10.9
43.5
9.5
18.4
22.2
13.3
12
23.7
17.8
36.6
7.1
60.4
10.7
5.3
1
4.3
0
A-74
-------
both surrogate and matrix spike results is found in Table 8. Individual results
are displayed in Table 9. All spiked analytes show acceptable precision. 24
of 29 (82.8%) fall below 10 percent difference with the remainder below 25
percent difference.
TABLE 8 SUMMARY - VGA SURROGATE AND MATRIX SPIKE RECOVERIES
Parameter
surrogate 1
surrogate 2
surrogate 3
matrix spike 1
matrix spike 2
Mean(%)
92.4
118.7
77.7
95.8
94.7
Std .Oev .
10.7
6.7
5.6
16.4
15.3
RSD
11.5
5.6
7.2
17.1
16.1
N
7
7
7
29
29
Range
83-111
111-128
73-87
61-130
63-120
TABLE 9 PERCENT RECOVERY RESULTS FOR VOA IN MATRIX SPIKES [250 uq/kg(ppb)]
Parameter
Spike 1 Spike 2 Mean % diff.
chloroethane 130
methylene chloride 120
carbon disulfide 78
1,1-dichloroethene 68
1,1-dichloroethane 110
trans-l,2-d1 chloroethane 120
chloroform 110
1,2-dichloroethane 110
2-butanone 98
1,1,1-trichloroethane 94
carbon tetrachloride 84
bromodichloromethane 95
1,2-dichloropropane 99
trans-l,3-d1chloropropene 94
trlchloroethene 95
dibromochloromethane 79
1,1,2-trichloroethane 85
benzene 100
cis-l,3-d1ch1oropropene 88
bromoform 61
2-hexanone 96
4-methyl -2-pentanone 100
tetrachloroethene 96
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane 64
toluene 120
chlorobenzene 100
ethyl benzene 100
styrene 92
total xylenes 95
120
100
63
76
110
120
110
86
120
93
86
94
98
94
95
81
86
100
89
65
106
100
94
64
110
99
98
94
95
125
110
70.5
72
110
120
110
98
109
93.5
85
94.5
98.5
94
95
80
85.5
100
88.5
63
101
100
95
64
115
99.5
99
93
95
8
18.2
17
11.1
0
0
0
24.5
20.2
1.1
2.4
1.1
2
0
0
2.5
1.2
0
1.1
6.3
9.9
0
2.1
0
8.?
1
2
2.2
0
A-75
-------
(flUTBCM, INC.
II»B»
TO.
FROM.
INTEROFFICE MEMO
Project File, TC 3338-28, QA/QC
Lynne Kilpatrick-Howard
.DATE.
12/23/87
SUBJECT QA/QC Review of the Puget Sound Marroalgae Data and the
Report generated by Joseph N. Blazevich, U.S. EPA
Region X
My review of the Puget Sound macroalgae data and the memorandum
generated by Joseph N. Blazevich and Raleigh Farlow of the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) Region X has been completed. The data are judged
acceptable and the recommendations made by the U.S. EPA reviewer are
appropriate. The guidance provided by the U.S. EPA reviewer was followed
and the recommended data qualifiers were assigned to the data.
The following database qualifiers were assigned to the Puget Sound
nacroalgae data submitted:
U - Undetected
J » Estimated value for one of the following reasons: compound
verified but not quantified because value exceeded the five-
point calibration curve, compound is tentatively identified,
response factor may be low, or the standard was not within the
allowed 25 percent response factor difference
M » Compound verified below quantification limit
B - Compound detected in associated blank
S - Data may be used for screening purposes only
NAR * No analysis results
NAI - Not analyzed because of interference.
A-76
-------
••*•&*
atatlon Hot FHA1
Sample Mo: Sfi 261000
Laboratory: RX
Begin Sample Date: 86/06/23 10:00 Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: 'FT NO FT, ULVA IFF, MR LIGHTHOUSE
Depth:
QA Cades
| Metals - Specified
I Parameter
Tissue
Result Units
Arsenic
Mercury
Lead
Copper
Zinc
Chromium.
Cadmium
As-Tiss
Hg-Tiss
Pb-Tiss
Cu-Tiss
tn-Tiss
Cr-Tiss
Cd-Tiii
0.12
0.002
0.25
14.34
4.2
1.5
0.111
•g/kg-wt
mg/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
mg/kg-wt
mg/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
mg/kg-wt
| VOA - FF Scan (QCMS) Tissue
| «•* Continued ***
I Parameter Result Units
| | B/N/Acid Scan Tissue
I I ••• Continued ***
Parameter Result Units
2-Hexanone 57UJ ug/kg
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 12U ug/kg
trans-1,3-Dichloroprope 12U ug/kg
| Mlsc QCMS Specified
j Parameter
Tissue
Result Units
| VOA - ft Scan (OCMS)
j Parameter
Tissue
Result Units
Carbon Tetracbloride 12U ug/kg
Acetone SOOOB ug/kg
Chloroform 12u ug/kg
Beniene 3.9J ug/kg
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 12U ug/kg
Bromomethane 25U ug/kg
Chloromethane 250 ug/kg
Chloroethane 25U ug/kg
Vinyl Chloride 25u ug/kg
Methylene Chloride 9.7flj ug/kg
Carbon Disulfide 12U ug/kg
Bromoform 12U ug/kg
Bromodichloromethane 12U ug/kg
1,1-Dichloroethane 12U ug/kg
1,1-Dichloroethene 12U ug/kg
1,2-Dichloropropane 12U ug/kg
2-Butanone 85 ug/kg
1,1.2-Trichloroethane 12U ug/kg
Trichloroethene 12U ug/kg
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroetha 25U ug/kg
Total Xylenes 12U ug/kg
Cthylbensene 12U ug/kg
Styrene 12U ug/kg
1,2-Dichloroethano 12U ug/kg
Vinyl Acetate 25(1 ug/kg
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 250 ug/kg
Toluene 12U ug/kg
Chlorobentene 12U ug/kg
2-Chloroethylvinyleth«r 25U ug/kg
Dibromochloroaethane 120 ug/kg
Tetrachloroethvne 12U ug/kg
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethena REQ
trans-1,2-Dichloro«thvn 12u ug/kg
Benio (a )py rene "7.00 ug/kg
Dibenso(a,h(anthracene 7.00 ug/kg
Benio(•(anthracene 7.0U ug/kg
Acenaphthene 7.00 ug/kg
Phenanthrana 7.00 ug/kg
riuorene 7.0U ug/kg
Naphthalene 7.0U ug/kg
2-Methylnaphthalene 7.0U ug/kg
2-Chloronaphthalene 7.0U ug/kg
4-Bromophenyl-phenyleth 7.00 ug/kg
Anthracene 7.0U ug/kg
Pyrene 7.00 ug/kg
Dibensofursn 7.0U ug/kg
Bento(ghitperylene 7.0U ug/kg
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 7.0U ug/kg
Ben*o(b)fluoranthene 7.0O ug/kg
Pluoranthene 7.0U ug/kg
Benio(k)fluoranthene 7.0U ug/kg
Acenaphthylene 7.0O ug/kg
Chrysene 7.0U ug/kg
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylet 7.0U ug/kg
| B/N/Acid Scan
j Parameter
Tissue
Result Units
Benio(a)pyrene 1100 ug/kg
2,4-Dinitrophenol 560U ug/kg
Dibento(a,h(anthracene 110U ug/kg
Benzo(a(anthracene 1100 ug/kg
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 1100 ug/kg
Bensoic acid 560U ug/kg
Hexachloroethane 1100 ug/kg
Hexachlorocyclopentadie 1100 ug/kg
Isophorona 1100 ug/kg
Acenaphthene 1100 ug/kg
Diethylphthalate 110BU ug/kg
Di-n-Butylphthalate 110BU ug/kg
Fhenanthrene 110U ug/kg
Butylbensylphthalate 11 Oil ug/kg
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine 9SOB ug/kg
Pluorene 110U ug/kg
Hexachlorobutadiene 110U ug/kg
Pentachlorophenol 560BO ug/kg
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 110U ug/kg
2-Nitroaniline S60U ug/kg
2-Nitrophenol 110U ug/kg
Naphthalene 110O ug/kg
2-Methylnaphthalene 1100 ug/kg
2-Chloronaphthalene 110U ug/kg
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine 2200 ug/kg
2-Methylphenol 1100 ug/kg
1,2-Oichlorobentene 110U ug/kg
o-Chlorophenol 1100 ug/kg
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 560U ug/kg
Nitrobenzene 110U ug/kg
3-Nitroaniline 5600 ug/kg
4-Hitroaniline 5600 ug/kg
4-Nitrophenol 5600 ug/kg
Benzyl Alcohol 1100 ug/kg
4-BroBOphenyl-phenyleth 1100 ug/kg
2,4-Dimethylphenol 110U ug/kg
4-Methylphenol 1100 ug/kg
1,4-Dichlorobenzene 1100 ug/kg
4-Chloroaniline 110U ug/kg
Phenol 1100 ug/kg
bis(2-Chloroethyl(Ether 1100 ug/kg
bis(2-Chloroethoxy(Meth 110O ug/kg
bis(2-Ethylhexyl(Phthal 1000B ug/kg
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 1700 ug/kg
Hexachlorobenzene 110U ug/kg
Anthracene 1100 ug/kg
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 110O ug/kg
2,4-Dichlorophenol 110U ug/kg
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 1100 ug/kg
Pyrene 1100 ug/kg
Dimethylphthalate 110U ug/kg
Dibenzofuran 1100 ug/kg
Benzo(ghi)perylene 110U ug/kg
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 110U ug/kg
(Continued on next page)
-------
JO-OCT-87
14:0«:55
Project: AMB-061A
Station Mo: PMA1
Sample Ho: 86 261000
Laboratory: RX
EPA Region x Lab Management System
Sample/Project Analyiia Reaulta
POQET SOUND IDIBLI MACROALOAE INVESTIOAT
Begin Sample Data: 86/06/2) 10:00 Sourca: Plant/Vegetation
Description: *PT HO PT, ULVA SPP, MR LXOHTHOOSE
Page 2
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2F
Depth:
QA Coda:
I B/M/Acid Scan Tlacua | | Peat/PCB - PP Scan Tissue I
I ••• continued *•• | | ••» Continued ••• I
| Parameter Raault Uaita j j Paraaatar kaault Unit* j
Banso(b)(luorantbane
Pluoranthana
Ben«o(k)f luoranthene
Acanaphthylana
Chryaena
4,C-Dinitro-2-aathylphe
1.3-Dichlorobaniana
2, 6-Dinitro toluene
R-Mitroao-di-n-Propyl*B
4-Chlorophenyl-pbanylet
bia ( 2-Chloroisopropyl )B
| Patt/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
^ 4, 4 '-DDT
00 ODD, o,p'-
Chlordana
ga«Ba-BHC (Lindana)
Dieldrin
Bndrin
MethoKychlor
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDI
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BBC
delta-BHC
DDT, 0,9'-
alpba-Bndoaulf an
Heptachlor epoxida
Cndoaulfan aulfata
DDE, o,p»-
Cndrin aldehyde
Toxaphana
PCB - 1260
PCB - 12S4
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Endo«ulf an
1100 ug/kg trana-Honachlor 1U ug/kg
1100 ug/kg PCB - 1242 10U ug/kg
1100 ug/kg
110U ug/kg
1100 ug/kg
3600 ug/kg
1100 ug/kg
1100 ug/kg
1100 ug/kg
110O ug/kg
1100 ug/kg
Tlaaue |
Reault Unita j
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
J ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
(Sanple Complete)
-------
Station mot PNA3
Saapla No: 1C 261001
Laboratory: ttX
B«gin flaapl* D«t»; (6/06/23 10:30 Sourca: Plant/Vagatation
Description: t>T NO FT, PORPHYRA SPP, MR LIGHTHOUSE
Dapth:
QA Cod«;
| Matale - Sp«ciri«d
| Par*B«t«r
Arccnic A»-Ti»«
H«rcucy H9-T1**
L«ad Pb-TU»
Copptr Cu-Tiii
Sine In-Ti»»
ChroaiuB Cr-Tisi
Cadaiu* Cd-Tict
| »««t/PCB - PP Sean
| PBCkB*t«[
4, 4 '-DDT
DDD, o,p'-
Chlot Dialdtin
^ Sndrin
UD Mtthoxychloc
4,4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Haptachlor
Aldrin
•lph«-BUC
b*ta-BHC
d«lta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
•lpha-Endo*ulf an
Haptachlor «poxid«
tndoaultan tulfat*
DDE, o,p'-
•ndrin ald»byd«
Toxaphan*
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1234
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
b«ta-Cndoaulfan
trans-Ronachlor
PCB - 1242
Ti**u*
R«fult Units
0.59 ng/kg-trt
0.001 »9/k9-wt
0.005U »9/kg-wt
0.93 «9/kg-wt
2.t «9/k9-wt
0.44 »9/k9-wt
0.222 «9/k9-wt
Tiitu*
R«»ult Unit*
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
It) ug/kg
100 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
It) ug/kg
10 ug/kg
lo ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
lu ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
10(1 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1O ug/kg
10(1 ug/kg
(Sanpl* Coaplata)
-------
30-OCT-I7
14:06:55
Project: AMB-061A
Station Hot PNA3
Sample Ho: 16 261002
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiei
Lead Pb-Tlss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Sine Sn-Tisi
CbroniuM Cr-Tiai
Ctdniusi Cd-tiai
| Peit/PCB - pp Scan
1 Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
3» ga»a-BHC (Lindane)
i Dieldrln
g indrin
Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDC
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BBC
delta-BUC
DDT, o,p»-
alpha-Endotulf an
Heptachlor epoxide
Bndosulfan aulfate
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCS - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 124*
PCB - 1016
beta-En do aulfan
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
EPA Region X Lab
Sample/Project
PUQET SOUND
Begin Sample Date: 16/06/23 10
Description: PT NO PT, L
Tissue |
Result Units j
3.31 »«/kg-wt
0.001U M/kg-wt
O.OOSU ng/kg-wt
0.63 Baykg-Mt
1.1 n«/kg-wt
0.0* Bfl/kg-wt
0.121 si9/k«-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
iu ug/kg
J ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
iu ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10U ug/kg
Management Systea
Analysis Results
EDIBLE NACROALQAE INVESTIOAT
:45 Source: Plant/Vegetation
AMINARIA, SPP, MR LIGHTHOUSE
Page 4
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2F
Depth:
QA Code:
(Staple Complete)
-------
»*•$*«*( »•»»-««I*
Station Hoi PM01
Sample Hot 16 261003
Laboratory: AX
Begin Sample Date: 16/06/23 12:00 Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: PT NO PT, LAHINARXA SPP, HANSVXLX.E PICK
OCCia*ci
Depth:
i > MM*.* a r
QA Cod*I
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
Arsenic Aa-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Sine zn-Tiss
Chromium Cc-Tiss
Cadmium Cd-Tiss
| P»st/PCB - PP Scan
| Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
gaama-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-ODE
Heptachlor
Aldrin
•Ipba-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Endo sultan
Heptacblor epoxida
EndoaulCan sultate
DDE, o.p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Tosaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
be ta-Endo sultan
trans-Honachlor
PCB - 1242
Tissue
Result Units
7.50 mg/kg-wt
O.OOlu mg/kg-wt
0.02 mg/kg-wt
1.45 mg/kg-wt
2.8 mg/kg-wt
0.20 mg/kg-wt
0.0(7 mg/kg-wt
Titsue
Result Units
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
3 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
iu ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Sample Complete)
-------
lo-ocT-n
14lO*t»l
Project! AMB-061A
Station Mo: PNB2
•••pi* Mo: t6 261004
Laboratory! RX
IP A Region X Lab Management Systea
f«»plf/proj«ct Analysis Results
PUOET SOUND EDIBLE MACROALOAE IRVESTIQAT
Begin Saaple Date: 86/06/23 12:10 Source: PItnt/Vegetation
Description: PT NO PT, ULVA SPP, HANSVILLE PIER
Fags
Officer: DTE Aooount: AHLB2F
Depth:
QA Code:
I Metals - Specified
Paranetec
CO
ro
Tissue |
Result Units j
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hf-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tisi
Sine tn-Tiss
Cbroaiua Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
Pest/PCB - pp scan
Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p»-
Chlordane
g»mm»-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
•ndrin
Hethoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachloc
Aldcin
alpha-BHC
beta-BUC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Bndosulfan
Heptachlor epoKlde
Endosulfan sultate
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCS - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulf an
trans-Monachlor
PCB - 1242
1.37
0.004
0.005U
11.31
6.1
1.IC
0.12S
Tissue
Result
1U
1U
1U
1U
1U
1U
10U
1U
3
1U
1U
1U
1U
10
1U
1U
10
10
1U
10
30U
100
10U
100
10U
100
100
10
10
10U
•9/k«-«t
•9/ki-wt
»«/kff-wt
•9/kfl-wt
•9/k«-wt
•«/k«-wt
•«/k«-wt
units
ug/k«
ug/k«
ug/k«
ug/k«
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
(Saaple Complete)
-------
0*«i«
Station Mot PUB)
Staple No: 16 261005
Laboratory: XX
| Metala - Specified
j Parameter
Arienic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiaa
Lead Pb-Tias
Copper Cu-Tiaa
Sine Zn-Tias
Chroaiua Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tise
| Peat/PCB - PP Scan
| Parameter
4,4* -DDT
ODD, 0,p'-
Chlordana
gaaaa-BMC (Lindane)
Oieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Endosulf an
Heptachlor epoxide
Kndosulfan sulfate
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosul(an
trans-Honachlor
PCB - 1242
Tiaaue
Result Units
4.45 ag/kg-wt
0.001U ag/kg-wt
0.155 ag/kg-wt
0.44 ag/kg-wt
2.2 mg/kg-wt
0.16 mg/kg-wt
0.363 mg/kg-wt
Tissue
Result Units
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
iu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
iu ug/kg
10U ug/kg
Staple Oat*: 16/06/23 12:15 Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: PT NO PT, HEREOCYSTIS SPP, HANSVILLE PIE
Depth:
QA Code:
(S*aple Complete)
-------
30-OCT-I7
14:0(:SS
Project: AMB-061A
Station Ho: PNB4
•••pie No: 1C 261006
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Ng-Tias
Lead Pb-Tiaa
Copper Cu-Tias
Bine Sn-Tias
Chroaiua Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
I Parameter
4, 4 '-DOT
ODD, O,p'-
Chlordane
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
*- Dieldrin
Bndrin
•P* Methoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DOB
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BNC
DDt, o.p'-
alpba-Bndosulf an
Boptachlor epoxide
Bndoaulfan sulfate
DOB, o,p>-
Bndrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 12S4
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
beta-Bndo sultan
trana-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tissue
Result Units
0.47 mg/kg-wt
0.001U ag/kg-wt
0.005U ag/kg-wt
2.11 ag/kg-wt
3.9 ag/kg-wt
0.<4 ag/kg-wt
0.394 ag/kg-wt
Tissue
Result Unite
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
tPA Region X Lab Management System
Staple/Project Analysi* Reiults
PUOET SOUND EDIBLE MACROALOAB INVESTIOAT
Begin Saaple Date: $6/0«/23 12:20 Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: PI NO FT, PORPHYRA »PP, HANSVtLLB PIER
I
P*9« I
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2F
Depth:
QA Code:
(Sanple Complete)
-------
Station Mot PMC1
Sample Ho: 16 261007
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
I Parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Sine tn-Tiss
Chroaiu* Cr-Tiss
Cadaiusi Cd-Tisa
| Peat/PCa - PP Scan
| Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
_ gamaa-BHC (Lindane)
i Dieldrin
& Cndrin
Methoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4,4'-DDE
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BBC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Bndosulf an
Heptachlor epoxide
Bndosulfan sulfate
DDE, 0,9'-
Endrin aldehyde
toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tissue
Result Units
1.10 M/kg-vt
0.001 mg/kg-wt
0.02 s.g/kg-wt
3.99 »g/ko;-wt
3.1 »g/kg-wt
0.74 ag/kg-wt
0.297 sig/kg-wt
Tissue
Result Units
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
10U ug/kg
«OX»>* «M
Begin Saaple Date: 66/06/23 13:30 Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: PT MO PT, ULVA SPP, SKUNK BAY
I
Depth:
QA Code:
(S*»ple Complete)
-------
10-OCT-l?
14>04tSI
frojacti AMB-061A
Station Mo: PMC2
Saapla No: *6 261001
Laboratory: RX
UFA fttgibn X tab MiAlg«B*hfc
Saapla/Ptojact Analytl* Miulta
PUOET IOUHD BD1ILI MACKOALOAC tHVESTIQAT
Bagin Saapla Data: (6/06/23 13:40 Sourca: Plant/Vagatation
Daacription: PT NO PT, LAHINAftXA SPP, SKUNK BAY
18
Oftleat: DTE Account! AMLi2?
Daptb:
QA coda:
| Natal* - Spacifiad
j Paraaatar
Arcanie Aa-Tita
Harcury Hg-Tiaa
Laad Pb-Titi
Coppar Cu-Tiia
line Sn-Tis*
chcoaiua cr-Tiit
Cadaiua Cd-Tiaa
| Paat/PCB - PP Scan
| Paraaatar
4, 4 '-DOT
ODD, o,p'-
Cblordana
gaaaa-BHC ILind*na)
^ Oialdrin
co Bndrin
c* Mathoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Haptaehlor
Aldrin
alpba-BHC
bata-BHC
dalta-BHC
ODt, o,p'-
alpha-Endoaulfan
Haptaehlor apoxida
Endoaulfan aulfata
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldahyda
Toxaphana
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 124*
PCB - 1016
bata-Endoaulfan
trana-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tiaaua |
Kaault Onita j
4.7S ag/kg-wt
0.001 ag/kg-wt
0.10 ag/kg-wt
0.16 ag/kg-wt
1.4 ag/kg-wt
0.20 ag/kg-wt
0.130 ag/kg-wt
Tiaaua |
Kaault Unita j
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
lu ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
3 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1O ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
(Saapla Coaplata)
-------
•••pl* Ho. *C 361009
Laboratory: RX
Begin Sample Date: S6/06/33 ll>4t Source: Plant/vegetation
Description: PT HO PT, HBREOCYSTIS SPP, SKUNK BAY
Depth:
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
| Parameter
Arsenic A§-Tl»i
Mercury Hg-Ti»«
Lead Pb-Titi
Copper Cu-Titi
Zinc la-lit*
ChroMlua Cr-Tin
Cad»iua Cd-Ti«s
| Patt/PCB - PP Scan
j Paraaeter
4,4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordan*
ga«B«-BHC (Lindana)
Dicldrin
^ Endrin
i Nathoxychlor
00 4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDB
Rsptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BllC
bata-BHC
dalta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Endo sultan
Haptachlor spoxid*
Cndosulfan sulfat*
DDI, o,p'-
Cndrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 12CO
PCB - L254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 124*
PCB - 1016
bata-Endoaulf an
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
tiitue |
Result Units |
3.35 ag/kg-wt
0.001U ag/kf-Ht
0.009U aq/kg-wt
5.13 »g/kg-wt
3.3 ag/kg-wt
1.43 ag/kg-wt
0.365 ag/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
2 ug/kg
lu ug/kg
lu ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
30U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Sample Complete)
-------
J9-OCT-I7
14««6ili
Project: AMB-Q61A
Station DOS PMC4
Staple Mo: 16 261010
Laboratory: BX
Region X Lab Managsasnt •yetsa
Sample/Project Analysis Results
: 16/06/2) p:»0 Source:
: PT NO PT, PORPHY»A 8PP, SKUNK BAT
Officer :
Depth:
I Hstals - Specified
I Parameter
Arsenic At-Tiss
Msreury Hg-Tias
Leed Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tils
line In-Tiss
Chroaiua Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
I Pett/PCB - PP Seen
I Paraaeter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
*» Dleldrin
i, Bndrin
CO Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DDK
Neptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BBC
beta-BHC
delts-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Bndosulcan
Heptachlor epoxide
Bndosulfan aulfate
DDI, o,p'-
Bndrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 124<
PCB - 1016
beta-Bndoaulfan
trana-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Ti..ue *
Remit Units
2.00 «g/kg-wt
0.0010 ag/kg-wt
O.OOSU ag/kg-wt
1.66 ag/kg-wt
1.1 »g/kg-wt
1.3* ag/kg-wt
0.207 ag/kg-wt
Tissue
Result Units
10 ug/kg
111 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
J ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
30U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
(Saapl* Complete)
-------
i- anrirs; x
XMVBBXiaAT
Station Hoi SHO1
Sa»pl* Mo: (6 261020
Laboratory: RX
B*gin Sa»pl* Oat*: 66/06/23 11:15 Sourc*: Flant/V*g«tation
Description: IVRT HRBB, OtVA, OARLINOTON BEACH
D*pth:
QA Cod*:
| H*talt - Specified
j Paraa*t*r
Arsanic Ac-Tit*
H*rcury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiii
Copp*r Cu-Ti§»
line Jn-Ti»»
Chroaiua Cr-Tits
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| P*at/PCB - PP Scan
1 Para»*t*r
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
chlordan*
9a»»a-BHC (Lindan*)
*" Dialdrin
oo cndrin
^° Nathoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4 ,4 '-DDE
H*ptachlor
Aldrin
alpba-BHC
b*ta-BHC
d*lta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-EndosulCan
Haptaehlor apoxid*
Bndoaulfan sulfat*
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldohyd*
Toxaph*n*
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
b*ta-Endoiulf an
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tisau* |
fc«iult Unit* j
0.43 »g/k7-wt
0.001U »q/kg-wt
0.10 ag/kg-wt
3.75 ng/kg-wt
2.2 »g/kg-wt
1.07 «g/kg-wt
0.041 ng/kg-wt
Tiaiu* |
Raault Units j
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
111 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
ID ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
iu ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
(Saapla Complata)
-------
30-OCT-I7
14i06l55
Projactt ANB-061A
Station Moi CHC1
Sanpla Ho: 16 261021
Laboratory: RX
| Natalt - Spacifiad
I Paraaatar
Araanic Aa-Tiaa
Marcury Hg-Tlaa
Laad Pb-Tiaa
Coppar Cu-Tiaa
Sine Sn-Tlaa
ChroaluM Cr-Tlaa
Cadaiun Cd-Tiaa
I Paat/PCB - PP Scan
| Paranatar
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordana
gaaaa-BHC (Llndana)
•7 Dialdrin
vo Bndrin
0 Mathoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDI
Haptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
bata-BHC
dalta-BUC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Endofulfan
Haptachlor apoxida
BndoauKan aulfata
DDK, o,p'-
•ndrln aldahyda
Toxaphana
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
bata-Sndoaulf an
trana-Ronachlor
PCB - 1242
tPA Ragion X Lab Managaaant Syata*.
Saaipla/Pro jact Analyaia Raaulta
PUQET SOUND EDIBLE MACROALOAE INVESTIOAT
Bagin Saapla Data: 16/06/23 12:45 Sourca: Plant/Vagatation
Daacription: EVRT HRBR, ULVA, HOWARTH PARK
Tiaaua |
Raault unita |
0.41 ng/kg-wt
0.001 ag/kg-wt
O.OS9 «g/kg-Mt
2.21 ag/kg-wt
2.1 »g/kg-Mt
0.19 mg/kg-Mt
0.053 ag/kg-Mt
Tiaaua |
Raault Unita j
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
3 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg .
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
iu ug/kg
1« ug/kg
IU ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10U ug/kg
Pa?a 14
Officar: DTE Account! AMLB2P
Dapth:
QA Coda:
(Saapla Coaplata)
-------
* •ouwo
•tatlon «oi IHA1
Saaple No: 86 261022
Laboratory: RX
Begin Saaple Oat*t 06/06/23 15:00 Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: *BVRT HRBR, ULVA, PRIEST POINT
D*pth:
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
I Parameter
Tissue
Result Unit!
t
Arsenic
Mercury
Lead
Copper
line
Chroaiui
Cadstiusi
As-Tiss
Hg-Tiss
Pb-Tiss
Cu-Tlia
Zn-Tiss
Cr-Tiss
Cd-Tisa
0.61
0.002
0.37
9.20
4.3
1.96
0 .058
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-vt
•g/kg-vt
»g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
»g/kg-vt
•9/k9-vt
| VOA - PP Scan (OCHS) Tiisue
| •*• Continued •*•
I Parameter Result Units
| | B/N/Acld Scan Tissue
j I »•• Continued •••
| | Paraaeter Result Units
2-Hexanone 34 ug/kg
cis-1,3-Olchloropropene 12U ug/kg
trans-1,3-Dlchloroprope 12U ug/kg
| 8/H/Acld Scan
j Parameter
Tissue
Result Unite
| VOA - PP Scan (QCMS)
I Parasieter
Tissue
Result Units
Carbon Tetrachlorid* 12U ug/kg
Acetone 24UJ ug/kg
Chloroform 12U ug/kg
Bensene 0.87J ug/kg
1,1.1-Trichloroethane 12U ug/kg
BroaoMethane 24U ug/kg
Chloroaethane 24U ug/kg
Chloroethan* 24U ug/kg
Vinyl Chloride 24U ug/kg
Methylene Chloride 60B ug/kg
Carbon Disulfide 12U ug/kg
BroMofor* 12U ug/kg
Bro»odichloroaethane 12U ug/kg
1,1-Dichloroethane 12U ug/kg
1,1-Dichloroethene 12U ug/kg
1.2-Dichloropropane 12U ug/kg
2-Butanone 318 ug/kg
1,1,2-Trichloroethane 12U ug/kg
Trichloroethene 12U ug/kg
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroetha 24U ug/kg
Total Xylenes 12U ug/kg
Bthylbeniene 12U ug/kg
Styrene 12U ug/kg
l,2-Dichloro*thane 12U ug/kg
Vinyl Acetate 2>J ug/kg
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 5.3J ug/kg
Toluene 1.3J ug/kg
Chlorobensene 12U ug/kg
2-Chloroethylvinyl«th»r 24U ug/kg
DibroKochloromethane 12U ug/kg
Tetrachloroethen* 12U ug/kg
Cls-1,2-Dichloro«then* REQ
trans-1,2-Dichloroethen 12U ug/kg
Benco(aIpyrene 120U ug/kg
2,4-Dinitrophenol StOU ug/kg
Dibenso(a,h)anthracene 120U ug/kg
Benso(a)anthracene 120U ug/kg
4-Chloro-3-Hethylphenol 120U ug/kg
Bencoic acid 580U ug/kg
Hexachloroethane 120U ug/kg
Hexachlorocyclopentadie 120U ug/kg
Isophorone 120U ug/kg
Acenaphthene 120U ug/kg
Diethylphthalate 120BU ug/kg
Di-n-Butylphthalate 120BU ug/kg
Phenanthrene 120U ug/kg
Butylbensylphthalate 1200 ug/kg
N-Hitrosodiphenylaaine 120BU ug/kg
Fluorene 120U ug/kg
Hexachlorobutadiene 1200 ug/kg
Pentachlorophenol 580BO ug/kg
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 120U ug/kg
2-Nitroaniline 580U ug/kg
2-Hitrophenol 120U ug/kg
Naphthalene 120U ug/kg
2-Methylnaphthalene 120U ug/kg
2-Chloronaphthalene 120U ug/kg
3,3'-Dichlorgbensidine 230U ug/kg
2-Methylphenol 120U ug/kg
1,2-Oichlorobensene 120U ug/kg
o-Chlorophenol 120U ug/kg
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 5JOO ug/kg
Hitrobensene 120U ug/kg
3-Nitroaniline 580U ug/kg
4-Nitroaniline 580U ug/kg
4-Nitrophenol 5800 ug/kg
Bensyl Alcohol 120U ug/kg
4-BroBophenyl-ph»nyleth 120U ug/kg
2,4-Diaethylphenol 120U ug/kg
4-Hethylphenol 120U ug/kg
1,4-Dichlorobensene 120U ug/kg
4-Chloroaniline 120U ug/kg
Phenol 120U ug/kg
bis|2-Chloroethyl)Ether 120U ug/kg
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Heth 1200 ug/kg
bis(2-Ethylhexyl)Phthal 730B ug/kg
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 1300 ug/kg
Uexachlorobencene 1201) ug/kg
Anthracene 120O ug/kg
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 120U ug/kg
2,4-Oichlorophenol 120U ug/kg
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 120U ug/kg
Pyrene 120U ug/kg
Dinethylphthalate 120U ug/kg
Dibensofuran 120O ug/kg
Benco(ghi)perylene 120U ug/kg
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 120U ug/kg
Benco(b)fluoranthtn* 120O ug/kg
Fluoranthene 1200 ug/kg
Benso(k)(luoranthene 1200 ug/kg
Acenaphthylene 1200 ug/kg
Chrysene 120U ug/kg
4,6-Dinitro-2-«ethylph« 5800 ug/kg
1,3-Dichlorob*ncene 1200 ug/kg
2,6-Oinitrotoluene 120O ug/kg
N-Nitroso-di-n-Propylan 1200 ug/kg
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylet 1200 ug/kg
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)E 120O ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
I Parameter
Tissue
Result Units
4,4'-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
g«»»a-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Hethoxychlor
4.4--DDD
4,4'-DOE
Heptachlor
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1O ug/kg
1O ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
4 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
(Continued on next page)
-------
30-OCT-ll
14t06:»!
Projact: AMB-061A
Station Hoi IHA1
Saapla No: 16 261022
Laboratory: ItX
EPA Ragion X Lab Man*ga««nt Syatan
Analyaia
Ptga 16
fUOET SOUBP CDIBLC MACROALOAJ JttVESTIGAT
Bagln Saapla Data: 86/06/21 15:00 Soutca: Plant/Vagatation
Daacriptioit!
-------
^—o< xA
atation net KBA1
Sanple No: 86 261040
Laboratory: RX
rnoumo moxmt.m
Sa«ple Date: 86/06/23 : Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: C BAY, PORPHYRA, SUITS VIEW PARK
Depth:
QA Code;
| Metals - Specified
I Parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiif
Copper Cu-Tiss
Sine Zn-TiiS
ChroaiuM Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| Peat/PCB - PP Scan
1 Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o.p'-
Chlordane
gaMa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
; Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4. 4 '-DDE
Heptachloc
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT , o , p ' -
alpha-Endosulfan
Heptaehlor apoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphcne
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-tndoaulf an
trana-Hoaachlor
PCB - 1242
Tissue
Result Units
3.01 Bg/kg-wt
0.001 Bg/kg-wt
0.145 ag/kg-wt
1.60 Bg/kg-wt
3.0 Bg/kg-wt
0.45 Bg/kg-wt
0.367 Bg/kg-wt
Tissue
Result Units
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
lOo ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
la ug/kg
100 ug/kg
(Staple Complete)
-------
30-OCT-I7
14:0
-------
OUMO
Station Hoi BBA4
Sa»pl« Ho: 1C 261043
Laboratory: RX
| lUtalt - Specified
1 V«ctB«t«r
Arsanic A»-Ti»»
Mtrcury Hg-Ti«»
L««d Pb-Titl
Copper Cu-Ti»»
line Zn-Tiit
Chro»iu» Cr-Tilt
Cudaiua Cd-Ti«»
| P««t/PCB - PP Scan
| Para>«t*r
4 ,4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordan*
t> 9*a>a-BHC (Lindan*)
' Dialdcin
01 Endrin
Hcthoxychloc
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDC
H«ptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
b*ta-BHC
d*lta-BKC
DDT, o,p'-
•ipha-BndosulIan
H*ptachlor cpoxid*
Endoaulfan sulfat*
DDE, o.p'~
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphen*
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 124«
PCB - 1016
beta-CndoiulCtn
trani-Monachloc
PCB - 1242
Ti*»U«
Reault unit*
2.70 ng/kfl-wt
0.001U ag/kf-wt
0.10 »9/kg-wt
0.2) »9/kg-*t
1.1 B9/k9-wt
0.01 B9/k9-ut
0.172 »»/kfl-wt
Ti»*U«
Reault Units
1U ug/k«
1U u9/kf
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
101) ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
Begin S*»ple Dates 16/06/23 t Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: I BAY, LAMINARIA, SUITS VIEW PARK
I
Depth:
QA Cod*:
(S*nple Couplet*)
-------
30-OCT-I7
14:06:55
Project! AMB-061A
Station Mo: EBB1
Saaple Ho: t6 261044
Laboratory: RX
EPA Region X Lab Management Systoa
Sasple/Project Analysis Results
PUQET SOUND EDIBLC MACROALQAE INVCSTIOAT
Begin Saaple Date: 46/06/23 s Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: E BAY, PORPHYRA, ALKI
Pag« 20
Officer: DTE Account: AHLB2F
Depth:
QA Cod*:
I Metals - Specified
I Parameter
Tissue |
Result Units j
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
fine In-Tiss
Chromiusi Cr-Tiss
Cadmium Cd-Tiss
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
| Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
•ndrin
Methoxychlot
4, 4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BBC
delta-BUC
DDT, o,p'-
alpba-Endo sultan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endoaulfan sulfate
DDB, o,p»-
Badrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
be ta-Endo sultan
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
3.20 mg/kg-wt
0.001U mg/kg-wt
0.24 mg/kg-wt
3. 93 mg/kg-wt
2 . 3 mg/kg-wt
0.39 mg/kg-wt
0.1 55 mg/kg-wt
Tissue 1
Result Units |
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10O ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
(Snaple Complete)
-------
11 XMB-O«i A
Station Met «BB3
Sample Mo: 86 261045
Laboratory: RX
ruasr uoamo •B±»I.B
Begin Saaiple Date: 86/06/23 : Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: E BAY, HERBOCYST1S, ALKI
of Clove i BTB
Depth:
Jkcoounti A»x.»ar
QA Code:
Metalt - Specified
Para»eter
Araenic Aa-Tiaa
Mercury Hg-Ti»a
Lead Pb-Tita
Copper Cu-Tiaa
Zinc Zn-Ti»a
ChroaiuB Cr-Tiai
Cadaiiua\ Cd-Tiaa
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
| Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
gaBB*-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Hethoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Cndoiulfan
Meptachlor epoxide
EndoaulCan aulfate
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-En do aulfan
trans- Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tiasue I
Reault Units j
3.35 »g/kg-wt
0.001U »g/kg-wt
0.15 «g/kg-wt
0.18 «g/kg-wt
4.0 sig/kg-wt
0.00 »g/kg-wt
0.43? »g/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Sanpla Complete)
-------
30-OCT-I7
14iQ*i9»
Project! AMB-061A
station No: IBB)
Sample Ho: 16 26104C
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
Araenic Ai-Titi
Mercury Hg-Tiea
Lead Pb-Tiia
Copper Cu-Tiea
Sine Sn-Tiaa
Chromium Cr-Tiaa
Cadmium Cd-Tis«
I Peat/PCB - PP Scan
1 Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, 0,p'-
Cblordane
9amaa-BHC (Lindane)
•f Dieldrin
10 tndrin
00 Mathoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4,4'-DDt
Heptacblor
Aldrin
alpba-BKC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p«-
alpha-Bndosulf an
Heptacblor epoxide
BndotulCan tulfate
DOB, o.p'-
Indrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
beta-Endoaulfan
trana-Honachlor
PCB - 1242
IPA Region X Lab Manag
Sample/Project Analy
PUOET SOUND BDIBL
Begin Sample Date: 86/06/23 :
Deacription: B BAY, ULVA, ALKt
Tiaaue I
Reault units I
0.73 ag/kg-wt
0.002 »g/kg-wt
0.16 ag/kg-wt
2.07 «g/kg-wt
2.S M/kg-wt
0.49 ag/kg-wt
0.122 mg/kg-wt
Tiaaue |
Reault Units j
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ufl/kfl
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
22
Officer: DTK Account: AMLB2F
Source: Plant/Vegetation
Depth:
QA Code:
(Sample Coaplets)
-------
Station Hoi *B*4
Saapla Mo: •« 261041
Laboratory: XX
ruamv moumo maxmt.m Mji.citoAi.aAB XMVB**XOAT
Bagin Saapla Data: 86/06/23 : Sourcas Plant/Vagatation
Description: C BAIT, LAMINABXA, ALKI
D«pthi
QA Coda:
| Matala - Spacifiad
1 Paraaatar
Araanic Aa-Tiaa
Marcury Hg-Tlaa
Laad Pb-Tlaa
Coppar Cu-Tiaa
line In-Tin
Chroaiua Cr-Tiat
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| Paat/PCB - PP Scan
| Paraaatar
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordana
.. ga»a-BHC (Lindana)
Dialdrin
3 Endrin
Mathoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4,4'-DDE
Baptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
bata-BHC
dalta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Endoaulf an
Haptachlor apoxida
EndoaulCan aulfata
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldahyda
Toxapbana
PCB - 12(0
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
bata-Endoaulfan
trana-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tiiau* |
Batult Unita |
4.25 -g/kg-wt
0.001U ig/kg-Mt
0.005U «g/kg-wt
0.45 ag/kg-wt
2.1 »g/kg-wt
0.05 mg/kg-wt
0.104 »g/kg-wt
Tiaau* |
Raault Unita |
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
111 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Saapla Coaplata)
-------
30-OCT-87
14:06:55
Project: AHB-061A
Station Ho: IBC1
Saapla Hoi 16 261041
Laboratory: RX
| Metals - Specified
I Paraaeter
Araenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Ti*s
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Sine Sn-Tiss
Chroalu* Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Paraaater
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
3> geaaa-BHC (Lindana)
^ Dialdrin
o Indrin
0 Mathoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4 ,4' -DOE
Haptacblor
Aldrin
alpha-BBC
b«ta-BHC
d«lta-BUC
DOT, o,p'-
alpba-Bndoiul(*n
Haptachlor tpoxida
Badoaulfan tulfata
DDK, o,p'-
Bndrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 12S4
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
bett-Endosulfan
trana-Honachlor
PCB - 1242
BPA Begion X tab ManageMent Syitea
Saaple/Pro ject Analysis Basulta
PUOET SOUND EDIBLE HACROALQAC IHVESTIOAT
Begin Saaple Date: 86/06/23 : Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: B BAX , PORPHYRA, DENNY WAY
Tissue |
Result Units |
3.88 «g/kg-ut
0.0010 ag/kg-wt
0.14 «g/kg-wt
1.S9 ag/kg-wt
S.4 ag/kg-wt
0.11 ag/kg-wt
O.OC2 ag/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
1U ug/kg
1U u«/k«
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1O ug/kg
100 ug/kg
Page 24
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2P
Depth:
QA Code:
(Saaple Coaplete)
-------
•OUHD
•tation Moi BBC2
Staple Ho: Bfi 261049
Laboratory: RJC
Begin Staple Data: 36/06/23 : Bource: Plant/Vegetation
Description: E BAY, NERCOCYSTIS, DEHWV WAIT
Depth :
QA Cod«:
| Metals - Specified
| Parameter
Araenic As-Tiis
Mercury Hg-Titt
Lead Pb-Tita
Copper Cu-Tiit
line Cn-Tisa
Chroaiua Cr-Tiia
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| Peat/pea - PP scan
| Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindanet
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4 , 4--DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptacblor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Endosultan
Heptacblor epoxide
Endoaulfan sultate
DDE, o.p'-
Indcin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1294
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
trana-Monachlor
PCB - 1242
Tiaaue |
Reault Units j
3.91 ag/kg-wt
0.001U ag/kg-wt
0.16 ag/kg-wt
0.21 ag/kg-wt
4.5 ag/kg— wt
0.07 ag/kg-wt
0.272 ag/kg-wt
Tiaaue |
Reault Units |
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
Id ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1(1 ug/kg
1(1 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
Id ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10(1 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10(1 ug/kg
(Sanpl* CoMplete)
-------
Mitfftl
•rojectl AMS-QIIA
Station He: EBC3
Sasiple Hat 6C 261030
Laboratory! RX
IP* M«ion X (.»b Hapaga*ent
|a»Bie/project
BUflET SQUBD C9!lhl
if
IBVS3TIOAT
Begin Saaple Date: 66/06/23 : Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: *B BAY, ULVA, DENNY WAY
COMont: BNA UNDOABLE, SEE SAMPLE <626105<
| Metals - Specified
1 Perasieter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tisi
Copper Cu-Tiss
Sine Cn-Tiss
ChroMiusi Cr-Tiss
Cadmium Cd-Tiss
| VOA - PP Scan (OCMS)
I Paraneter
Carbon Tetrachloride
j» Acetone
i Chloroform
Q Bensene
ro 1,1,1-Trlchloroethane
Chloromethane
Chloroethane
vinyl Chloride
Methylene Chloride
Carbon Disulfide
Bromof orm
Bromodi chloromethane
1,1-Dichloroethane
1,1-Dichloroethene
1 , 2-Dichloropropane
2-Butanone
1 , 1,2-Tri Chloroethane
Trichloroethene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroetha
Total Xylenes
Etbylbeniene
Stycene
1,2-Di Chloroethane
Vinyl Acetate
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone
Toluene
Chlorobensene
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether
Dibromochlorone thane
Tetrachloroethen*
Cit-l,2-Dichloroethane
trans-l,2-Dichlocoethen
Tissue |
Result Unite |
0.004 mg/kg-wt
1.16 mg/kg-wt
4.23 mg/kg-wt
4.1 mg/kg-wt
0.046 mg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units |
12U ug/kg
87008 ug/kg
12U ug/kg
120 ug/kg
12U ug/kg
290 ug/kg
2SO ug/kg
290 ug/kg
29U ug/kg
17B ug/kg
12U ug/kg
12U ug/kg
12U ug/kg
120 ug/kg
120 ug/kg
120 ug/kg
93 ug/kg
120 ug/kg
120 ug/kg
290 ug/kg
120 ug/kg
120 ug/kg
120 ug/kg
120 ug/kg
43 ug/kg
290 ug/kg
120 ug/kg
120 ug/kg
290 ug/kg
12U ug/kg
12U ug/kg
REQ
120 ug/kg
| VOA - PP Scan (vm«AtMjV
1 * *
2-Hexanone
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1 , 3-Dichloroprope
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j parameter
4 ,4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Hethoxychlor
4, 4 '-000
4,4' -DDE
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, 0,p'-
alpha-Endosultan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1294
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1246
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Result Units
29U ug/kg
12U ug/kg
120 ug/kg
Tissue
Result Units
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
3 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
300 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1
1
i
i
1
1
Officer: OTE AfiC9«lU:
Depth :
QA Code:
complete)
-------
ff -iff fee
0t«ti«A «ot PRO)
Saapl* Hoi •< 261012
Laboratory: RX
5SS5ff-tt"Hs
f«ff*» «M**f-«*«Wft«M»f f
• •gin Stapl* Data: 16/06/23 ! Sourca: PI«nt/Y«g«t«tion
Description: B BAY, PORPHXRA, PIER »1
SSftPSE! Bft
| Metals - Specified
| Parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
line In-Tiss
chroaiust Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tiss
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
1 Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
DOD, o.p'-
Chlordane
2> gasma-BMC (Lindane)
i Dieldrin
Q Endrin
Go Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p«-
alpha-Endosulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
DDE, o.p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tissue
Result Units
2.73 Bg/kg-wt
0.003 ag/kg-wt
0.005 Bg/kg-wt
1.42 Bg/kg-wt
2.3 »g/kg-wt
0.16 mig/kg-wt
0.085 »g/kg-wt
Tissue
Result Units
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
1O ug/kg
2 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1(1 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10O ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
-------
JO-OCT-17
14:04:55
Project: AMB-061A
Station Ho: IBD2
Sample NO: 16 261053
Laboratory: ax
| M«tal« - Specified
| Parameter
Arsenic Aa-Tia*
Mercury Hg-Tiaa
Load Pb-Tiaa
Coppor Cu-Tiu
Sine Sn-Tiei
Chroaiu* Cr-Tiae
CadaiuB Cd-Tiaa
I Peat/PCB - ft Scan
I Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, O.p'-
Chlordane
> ga»«a-BHC (Lindane)
' Dieldrin
o Indrin
*» Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDI
Heptachlor
Aldria
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BBC
DDT, 0,p«-
alpha-EndomlCan
Heptachlor opoxide
Endoiulftn aulfate
DDE, o,p'-
Bndrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCS - 1254
PCB - 122i
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
beta-Endoiulfan
trani-Monachlor
PCB - 1242
IPA Region X Lab Nantgeaent Syitea
Saipla/Pro ject Analyaia Reiults
PUQET SOUND EDIBLE NACROALOAI INVESTIOAT
Begin Sample Date: 16/06/23 : Source: Plant/Vegetation
Doacription: E BAY, NERCOCYSTIS , PIER 91
Tiaaue I
Keault unit* j
2.60 M/kg-wt
O.OOiU ng/kg-wt
0.14 «g/kg-wt
0.20 »g/kg-wt
4.9 »g/kg-wt
O.OS ag/kg-wt
0.340 ag/kg-wt
Tiaaue |
Reault Unit* j
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
Page 28
Officer: DTE Account: ANLB2F
Depth:
QA Code:
(Saaple Complete)
-------
OC(le*r t OTB
Station Net BSD)
Saaple Ho: <6 261054
Laboratory: RX
Begin Sasiple Date: S6/0«/23 : Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: I BAY, ULVA, PIER 91
Depth:
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
I Parameter
Tissue
Result Unit*
Arsenic
Mercury
Lead
Copper
Zinc
ChroaiuB.
Cadaiu*
As-Tiss
Hg-Tiss
Pta-Tiss
Cu-Tiss
Cn-Tiss
Cr-Tiss
Cd-Tiss
0.90
0.003
0.54
11.60
5.3
2.33
0.0*74
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
»9/kg-wt
»9/k9-vt
| B/N/Acid Scan
Tiaiu*
R*iult Units
B«nto(a )pyr«n« 150U uq/kg
2,4-Dinitroph«nol 730U
Dib«nso(a,h)anthrac«n« 150U
~P> B«nio(a )anthrac«n« 1SOU
*_ 4-Chloro-3-M«thylph«nol 150U
o B«ncoic acid 730U
^ H«xachloro«thin« 1500
H«nachlorocyclop«nt»di« 150U
I»ophoron« 1SOU
Ac«naphth«n» 150U
Di»thylphthalata 150U
Di-n-Butylphthalat* 150U
Ph«nanthr«n« 150U
Butylb«ntylphthalat« 150U
N-Hitrosodiph«nyla»in« 1SOU
rluor«n* 1SOU
H«xachlorobutadi*n* 1SOU
P*ntachloroph«nol 730U
2,4 ,<-Trichloroph«nol 150U
2-Nitroanilin« 730U
2-Ritroph*nol 1500
Naphthalcn* 1500
2-K«tbylnaphthal«n« 150U
2-Chloronaphthal*n« 150U
3,3'-Dichlorob«nsidin« 290U
2-N*thylph«nol 150U
l,2-Dichlorob«nc«n« 150U
o-Chloroph«nol 150U
2,4,S-Trichloroph«nol 730U
Ritrob«os«n« 1500
3-Sitroanilin« 1300
4-Nitroanilin* 730U
4-Nitroph«nol 7300
uq/kg
ug/kg
ug/k9
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
| B/N/Acid Scan Ti»iu«
j *** Continued **•
| Para»«t«r R«sult Units
| | P«st/PCB - PP Scan Tissu*
j j »*» Continued •••
I Paran«t«r Rvsult Onits
B«n«yl Alcohol 150U ug/kg
4-Bro»oph«nyl-ph«nyl«th 150U ug/kg
2,4-Di«»thylph«nol 150U ug/kg
4-M*thylph*nol 1SOU ug/kg
1 , 4-DUhlorob«n««n« 150U ug/kg
4-Chloroanilin« 1500 ug/kg
Phenol 150U ug/kg
bi»(2-Chloro«thyl)tth«r 1500 ug/kg
bia(2-Chloro«thoKy)M»th 1500 ug/kg
bi«(2-tthylh«xyl|Phthal 1SOBU ug/kg
Di-n-Octyl Phthalat* 540B ug/kg
H*xachlorob*ni*n« 150U ug/kg
Anthracan* 1500 ug/kg
1,2,4-Trichlorob«nx«n« 150U ug/kg
2,4-Oichlorophsnol 1SOU ug/kg
2,4-Dinitrotolu«n» 1500 ug/kg
Pyran* 1500 ug/kg
Diaathylphthalat* 150O ug/kg
Dibancofuran 1500 ug/kg
B«nso(ghi)p«ryl«n« 1500 ug/kg
Ind«no(1,2,3-cd)pyr«n« 150U ug/kg
B»nio(b)fluoranthana 1500 ug/kg
riuoranth«n* 1500 ug/kg
B«nso(k)fluoranthan* 1500 ug/kg
Acanaphthylana 1500 ug/kg
Chryiana 1SOU ug/kg
4,6-Dinitro-2-B«thylph« 7300 ug/kg
1,3-Dichlorobtni«na 1500 ug/kg
2,6-Dinitrotoluan» 150U ug/kg
M-Nitroio-di-n-Propylaa 1SOU ug/kg
4-Chloroph«nyl-ph«nyl«t 1500 ug/kg
bi»(2-Chloroiaopropyl)E 1500 ug/kg
| P*st/PCB - PP Scan
j Paraaatar
Tis*u*
Raiult Units
4,4'-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlocdana
gaaiaa-BHC (Lindana)
Dialdrin
Endrin
Mathoxychlor
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
4,4'-ODD
4,4'-DDE
Haptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
bata-BHC
dalta-BHC
DDT, o.p'-
alpha-Endosulfan
Haptachlor apoxida
Endoculfan sulfata
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldahyda
Toxaphana
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1246
PCB - 1016
bata-Endotulfan
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1O ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
(Sample Complete)
-------
jo-oct-n
14:06:91
Project: AMB-061A
Station Ho: CBB1
Sample Mo: (6 261060
Laboratory: RX
I Metals - Specified
| Parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Mg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Bine En-Tiss
ChrosiiuB Cr-Tiss
CadBiuB Cd-Tiss
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, 0,p'-
Chlordane
*• gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
>L Dleldrin
o Endrin
w Methoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptaehlor
Aldrin
alpha-BBC
beta-BMC
delta-BHC
DDT , o , p ' -
alpha-Endosulf an
Heptaehlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfato
DDE, o.p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxsphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 12J2
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
IP A Region X Lib
•aaple/Project
PUQET SOUND
Begin Saaple Date: 86/06/21 10
Description: c BAY, ULVA
Tissue
Result
1.24
0.002
0.46
3.01
J.2
0 . 18
0.08S
Tissue
Result
JU
JU
3U
3U
JU
JU
JOU
JU
4
JU
JU
JU
JU
JU
JU
JU
JU
JU
JU
JU
sou
JOU
JOU
JOU
JOU
JOU
JOu
JU
JU
JOU
1
Units |
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-Mt
•g/kg-Mt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
1
units |
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
MtnageMnt iyitfi
Analyais Results
EDIBLE HACROALOAI 1NVESTIQAT
:J5 Source: Plant/Vegetation
, TACOMA riSHINQ PIER
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2P
Depth:
QA Code:
(SftBple Complete)
-------
Station Net c»»2
Sample Mo: 86 261061
Laboratory: RX
Begin Sample Date: 16/06/23 10:35 Source; Plant/Vegetation
Description: C BAY, LAMINARIA, TACOMA FISHING PIER
Depth:
QA Coda:
| Metals - Specified
j P«c**«t«c
Arsenic A§-Ti»»
Mercury Hq-Titt
La«d Pb-Tiif
Copper Cu-Tii«
line Zn-Tiis
Chromium Cr-Titi
CadaiuM Cd-Ti»i
| Peit/PCB - PP Scan
1 Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
gamma-BHC (tindane)
, Dieldrin
*-• Endrin
5 Methoxychlor
4 ,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDC
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BUC
beta-BHC
dalta-BHC
DDT , o , p • -
alpha-Cndoiul fan
Heptachlor epoxide
Bndoaulfan sulfate
DDE, o,p'-
Kndrin aldehyde
Toicaphene
FCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1246
PCB - 1016
beta-Cn do sultan
trans -Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tissue
Result Units
4.20 Bg/kg-vt
0.001U mg/kg-wt
0.015 ag/kg-wt
0.52 ag/kg-wt
3.4 mg/kg-wt
0.07 mg/kg-wt
0.201 mg/kg-wt
Tissue
Result Units
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
ID ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Snnple Complete)
-------
Project: AM8-061A
Station Hoi CBA1
•aaple Mo: 16 261062
Laboratory: RX
EPA Region X L»b Management Syttea
Sa»pl«/ProJect Analysis RetuUs
PUOET SOUHP EDIBLE MACROALOAS INVESTIOAT
Begin Staple Date: 86/06/23 12<00 Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: C BAY, NEREOCVSTII, W PT DBF BOAT HOUSE
OMl6«r: OTR
Depth:
: AML02F
QA Cod«:
| Metala - Specified
| Pacaaeter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tlss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Bine Bn-Tiss
Chroaiua Cr-Tiss
Cad.iu. Cd-Tiss
| Pest/PCI - PP Scan
j Paraaeter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
j» gaaaa-BHC (Llndane)
• Dieldrin
o Bndrin
CO Methoxychlor
4, 4 '-ODD
4,4'-ODE
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BKC
DDT, o,p»-
alpha-Endoaulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
DDB, o,p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1241
PCB - 101<
beta-Kndo«ul f an
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tissue |
Result Units j
1 . 55 ag/kg-wt
0.001U ag/kg-wt
0.005U ag/kg-wt
0.11 ag/kg-wt
2.1 ag/kg-wt
0.01U ag/kg-wt
0.171 ag/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units j
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
iu ug/kg
10U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
3 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Saaple Coaplete)
-------
•Cation Hot CBA2
Saaple No: 16 261063
Laboratory: RX
| M«t«ll - Specified
| p«r«»*t«r
Arsenic A»-TU«
Mercury Hg-Tii*
L«*d Pb-Tifl
Copper Cu-TiȤ
Sine Jn-Tii»
ChromiuB Cr-Tin
C«daiu» Cd-Tii*
| P««t/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
9«a»a-BHC (Lindan*)
, Dieldrin
"-• Endrin
g Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4,4'-DDE
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Endotulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfat*
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCS - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
tran»-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tiiaua
Result Units
4.10 Mg/kg-ut
0.001U Mg/kg-wt
0.34 .g/kg-wt
0.92 ag/kg-wt
3.5 ag/kg-wt
0.10 ag/kg-wt
0.152 ag/kg-wt
Tisaue
Result Units
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
fUamf • DUMB BDZBZ.B :«*«:*«*«.<»*.•
••gin Saaple Date: (6/06/23 12:00 Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: C BAY, LAMINARIA, W PT DBF BOAT HOUSE
I
Depth :
QA Code
(Saaple Coaplete)
-------
10-OCT-67
£PA Region X Lab Managea«,nt S,yste*
fa^ple/Proqect Analysif Rt«.ults
14
;; A.MB-9S1A
Station Not CBA3
Saaple No: 86 261064
Laboratory: RX
EDIB.LJ MACROALgAJ INVBSTiqAT
Begin Sanple Date: 86/06/23 12:00 Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: C BAY, ULVA. W PT DBF BOAT HOOSE
: P?g
Depth:
QA Codej
| Metals - Specified
j Parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tias
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tisa
Sine Sn-Tisa
Chromiun Cr-Tisa
Cadaiua Cd-Tiaa
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
DDD, o,p'-
Cblordane
J> gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
^ Oieldrin
•— • Endrin
0 Methoxychloc
4, 4 '-DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptaehlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o.p'-
alpha-Endosulfan
Heptaehlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
bata-Endoaulf an
t rans -Nona ch lor
PCB - 1242
Tissue
Result
2.78
0.015
4.46
19.15
10.2
1.59
0.102
Tissue
Result
10
10
10
10
1U
10
100
10
3
10
10
10
10
10
10
1U
10
10
1U
10
300
100
10U
10U
10U
100
100
10
10
100
1
Units 1
Bg/kg-wt
»g/kg-wt
Bg/kg-wt
Bg/kg-wt
Bg/kg-wt
»g/kg-wt
Bg/kg-wt
1
Units |
ug/kg
«g/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
ug/kg
(Sample Complete)
-------
9 O — OCX—•7
14:06 :55
Project: AMB-Q61A
station No: CBC1
Sample No: 86 361065
Laboratory: RX
Sample/Pro i«ct Analysa"R»auIca~
PUGET SOUNP EDIBLE MACROALOA6 INVESTIGAT
Begin Sample Date: 86/06/23 12:30 Source: PIant/Vegetat ion
Description: C BAY, ULVA, SOUTH OF ASARCO PLANT
Officer: DTE
Depth:
Account;
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
j Paranetec
Arsenic Aa-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Bine Zn-Tiss
Chroaiua Cr-Tiss
Cadaiua Cd-Tiaa
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4 ,4 '-DOT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
gaaaa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Endosulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
DDE, o,p'-
Endrln aldehyde
Toxapbene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Cndoaul Can
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tissue |
Result Units j
1.19 ag/kg-wt
0.003 ag/kg-wt
0.37 ag/kg-wt
2.37 ag/kg-wt
2.4 ag/kg-wt
0.21 ag/kg-wt
0.111 ag/kg-wt
Tissue |
Besult Units j
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
2 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
IU ug/kg
IU ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Sample Couplet*)
-------
30-OCT-I7
CPA Ragion X Lab Managaaant Syataa
Saapla/Projact Analytii Raaulta
Pag* J6
Projact: AHB-061A
Station No; CBC2
Saapla Mo: 16 261066
Laboratory: RX
1 Hatala - Spaclflad
I Paraaatar
Araanic Aa-Tiaa
Marcury Hg-Tiaa
Laad Pb-Tiaa
Coppar cu-Tiaa
line Sn-Tiaa
Chroaiua Cr-Tiaa
Cadaiua Cd-Tiaa
| Patt/PCB - PP Scan
j Varaaatar
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, o.p'-
Chlordana
gaaaa-BHC (Lindana)
> Dioldrin
t_> Bndrin
•-• Hathoxychloc
^° 4,4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DOB
Haptachlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
bata-BHC
dalta-BKC
DDT, o,p'-
•lph«-Cndo*ulfan
Haptachlor apoxida
Bndoaulfan aulfata
DDB, o,p'-
Endrln aldahyda
Toxaphan*
PCB - 1260
PCB - 12S4
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 124S
PCB - 1016
bata-Endoaulf an
trana-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Begin Saapla Data:
Daacription:
Tiaaua
Raault Unita
».20 ag/kg-wt
0.001U ag/kg-wt
0.1» ag/kg-wt
0.72 ag/kg-wt
3.9 ag/kg-wt
0.07 ag/kg-wt
0.2«0 ag/kg-wt
Tiaaua
Raault Oaita
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
ID ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
PUOJI SOUND BDTILC MACRQALOAG INVCSTIQAT
B6/06/23 12:30 Sourca: Plant/Vagatation
C BAY, LAMINARIA, SOUTH OP ASARCO PLANT
|
1
1
1
0<(icar: OTE AccQMnt:
Depth:
QA Cod«:
(Saapl* Coaplata)
-------
,• ';.»«»!»••*.« *•«*-«**.*.
•tation Met CBO1
Sample No: 86 261067
Laboratory: RX
raamr BOUND
IHV««»I<»A.*
Begin Sample Dat«: 86/06/23 13:00 Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: *C BAY, ULVA, RUSTON WAY PARK SITE
Depth:
QA Code;
| Metals - Specified
I Parameter
Tissue |
Result Units j
Arsenic
Mercury
Lead
Copper
Zinc
Chromium
Cadmium
At-Tiss
Hg-Tiss
Pb-Tiss
Cu-Tist
Zn-Tiss
Cr-Ti««
Cd-Tiss
0.94
0.002
0.73
2.45
4.1
0.37
0.148
•g/kg-wt
mg/kg-wt
»o;/kg-«t
»g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
»9/k«-wt
•9/kg-wt
| VOA - PP Scan (OCHS) Tissue
j ••• Continued ••*
| Parameter Result Units
| | B/N/Acid Scan Tissue
j j •** Continued *•*
I I Parameter Result Units
2-Hexanone 12J ug/kg
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene 12U ug/kg
trans-l,3-Dichloroprope 12U ug/kg
| B/R/Acid Scan
Parameter
Tissue
Result Units
| VOA - PP Scan (OCMS)
I Parameter
Tissue |
Result Units |
Carbon Tetrachloride 12U ug/kg
Acetone UOOOB ug/kg
Chloroform 12U "9/k«
3> Beniene 2.1J U9/K9
' 1,1,1-Trichloroethane 12U ug/kg
£ Bromomethane 24U ug/kg
L-.J chloromethane 24U ug/kg
Chloroethane 24U ug/kg
Vinyl Chloride 24U ug/kg
Kethylene Chloride 19B ug/kg
Carbon Disulfide 12U ug/kg
Bromoform 12U ug/kg
Bromodichloromethane 12U ug/kg
1,1-Dichloroethane 12U ug/kg
1,1-Dichloroethene 12U ug/kg
1,2-Oichloropropane 12U ug/kg
2-Butanone 40B ug/kg
l,1.2-Trichloroeth«ne 12U ug/kg
Trichloroethene 12U ug/kg
1,1.2,2-Tetrachloroetha 24U ug/kg
Total Xylenes 12U ug/kg
Bthylbeniene 12U ug/kg
Styrene 12U «9/k9
1,2-Dichloroethane 12U ug/kg
Vinyl Acetate 39 ug/kg
4-Methyl-2-Pentanone 24U ug/kg
Toluene 1•5J ug/kg
Chloroben*ene 12U ug/kg
2-Chloroethylvinyl*ther 24U ug/kg
Dibromochloromethane 12U ug/kg
Tetrachloroethene 12U ug/kg
Cis-1,2-Dichloroeth«n» RGQ
trans-l,2-0ichloroethen 12U ug/kg
Benso(a)pyrene 240U ug/kg
2,4-Dinitrophenol 1200U ug/kg
Oibenso(a,h)anthracene 240U ug/kg
Benso(a)anthracene 240U ug/kg
4-Chloro-3-Methylphenol 240U ug/kg
Bensoic acid 1200U ug/kg
Hexachloroothane 240U ug/kg
Hexachlorocyclopentadie 240U ug/kg
Isophorone 240U ug/kg
Acenaphthene 240U ug/kg
Diethylphthalate 240BU ug/kg
Di-n-Butylphthalate 240BU ug/kg
Phenanthrene 240U ug/kg
Butylbsntylphthalate 240U ug/kg
N-Nltrosodiphenylamine 240BU ug/kg
Fluorene 240U ug/kg
Hexachlorobutadiene 240U ug/kg
Pentachlorophenol 1200BU ug/kg
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol 240U ug/kg
2-Nitroaniline 1200U ug/kg
2-Mitrophenol 240U ug/kg
Naphthalene 240U ug/kg
2-Methylnaphthalene 240U ug/kg
2-Chloronaphthalene 240U ug/kg
J,3'-Dichlorobentidine 470U ug/kg
2-Hethylphenol 240U ug/kg
1,2-Dichlorobencene 240U ug/kg
o-Chlorophenol 240U ug/kg
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 1200U ug/kg
Nitrobensene 240U ug/kg
3-Hitroiniline 1200U ug/kg
4-Nitroaniline 1200U ug/kg
4-Nitrophenol 1200U ug/kg
Bensyl Alcohol 240U ug/kg
4-Bromophenyl-phenyleth 240U ug/kg
2,4-Dimethylphenol 240U ug/kg
(Continued on next page)
4-Methylphenol 240U ug/kg
1,4-Dichlorobeneene 240U ug/kg
4-Chloroaniline 240U ug/kg
Phenol 240" ug/kg
bis(2-Chloroethyl(Ether 240U ug/kg
bis(2-Chloroethoxy)Meth 240U ug/kg
bis<2-Ethylh«xyl)Phthal 240BU ug/kg
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate 240U ug/kg
Hexachlorobencene 240U ug/kg
Anthracene 2*OU ug/kg
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 240U ug/kg
2,4-Dichlorophenol 2400 ug/kg
2,4-Dinitrotoluene 240U ug/kg
pyrene 240U ug/kg
Dinethylphthalate 240U ug/kg
Dibenzofuran 240U ug/kg
Benzo(ghi)perylen» 240U ug/kg
Ind«no(l,2,3-cd)pyrene 240U ug/kg
Banzo(b)fluoranthane 240U ug/kg
Fluoranthene 240U ug/kg
Benzo(k)fluoranthene 240U ug/kg
Acenaphthylene 240U ug/kg
Chrysene 240U ug/kg
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylph« 1200U ug/kg
1,3-Dichlorob«n«ene 240U ug/kg
2,6-Dinitrotoluene 240U ug/kg
N-Nitroso-di-n-Propylam 240U ug/kg
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylet 240U ug/kg
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)E 240U ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
| Parameter
Tissue
Result Units
4,4'-DOT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Hethoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4 , 4'-DDE
Heptachlor
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
lu ug/kg
-------
30-OCT-I7
14:06:55
Project: AMB-061A
Station Mo: CBD1
•••pi* Hoi 16 2C1067
Laboratory: RX
EPA Region X Lab Management Systea
Saaipls/Project Analysis Results
PUOET SOUND EDIBLE MACROALQAE INVESTIOAT
Begin Sastple Date: 56/06/23 11:00 Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: *C BAY, ULVA, RUSTON WAY PARK SITE
Pags 38
Officer: DTE Account: AMLB2P
Depth:
QA Code:
| Peat/PCB - PP Scan Tissue |
I ••• Continued ••* |
j Parameter Result Units
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BBC
DOT, o,p«-
alpha-Endosulfan
Reptachlor epoxide
Cndosulfan sulfate
DDE, o.p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 124t
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
111 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
IV ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Simple Complete)
-------
—«**»
Station Hot CBOi
Saaple No: «6 261061
Laboratory: RX
• gin S«»ple Date: 46/06/23 13:00 Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: C BAX, LAMINARIA, RUSTOM WAV PARK SITE
Depth:
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
1 parameter
Arsenic As-Tiii
Heecury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tisi
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Sn-Tiss
Chromium Ct-Tisi
Cadmium Cd-Tlss
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
| Parameter
4 ,4 '-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
gamma-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Methoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
Aldrin
•Ipha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Endosulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosultan sulfate
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 124ft
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
t rans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tissue I
Result Units |
5.30 mg/kg-wt
0.001U ag/kg-wt
0.44 »g/kg-wt
1.11 mg/kg-wt
3.4 mg/kg-wt
0.15 «g/kg-wt
0.1*71 mg/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units |
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Sanple Complete)
-------
30-OCT-I7
U:OC:SS
Project: AMB-061A
Station Ho: BIA1
sample HO: 16 261010
Laboratory: RX
EPA Region X Lab Management Systea
Staple/Project Analysis Results
PUOET SOUND EDIBLE MACROALOAE INVESTIOAT
Begin Saaple Date: 66/06/23 : Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: BD IKLT. ULVA, TTKLE COVE
40
Officer: DTE Account: AHL82F
Depth:
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
I Parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-tiss
line tn-Tiss
Chroaiuai Cr-Tiss
CadMiuBi Cd-Tiss
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
1 Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, 0,p>-
Chlordane
i ga«s>a-BHC (Lindane)
•— Dieldrin
^ Endrin
MethoKychlor
4,4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DDK
Heptacblor
Aldrin
alpba-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Endosulfan
Meptachlor epoxido
Endosulfan sulfate
DDE, o,p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 12CO
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1212
PCB - 1241
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
trans-Honachlor
PCB - 1242
Tissue |
Result Units j
0.94 »g/kg-wt
0.001 ng/kg-wt
0.165 Bf/ka-wt
2.02 ng/kg-wt
2 . 5 sig/kg-wt
1.14 sg/kg-wt
0.144 aig/kg-wt
Tissue |
Result Units |
1U ug/kg
1O ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1(1 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
(Sfinpl*
-------
AMB-OClA
Itation Hoi BIB1
Sample No: 86 261081
Laboratory: RX
~~m»£il£Tm2l?* • 3 SSS SinSSy STm ""£••»£Z £ • ~~
VUOBT BOUMD BDXBI.B HACBOAI.OAB IWir«»*S«AT
Begin Sastple Date: 86/06/23 : Source: Plant/Vegetation
Description: *BD INtT, ULVA, DNR DOCK
OCCloc: DTB
Depth:
Account : ANt.B2r
QA Code:
| Metals - Specified
I Parameter
Tissue |
Result Units j
Arsenic
Mercury
Lead
Copper
Zinc
ChrostiuB
CadaiuB
As-Tiss
Hg-Tiss
Pb-Tiss
Cu-Tiss
Zn-Tiss
Cr-Tisi
Cd-Tiss
0.34
0.003
0.09
1.51
2.4
0.35
0.102
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-ut
•g/kg-vt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
•g/kg-wt
| VOA - pp Scan (OCMS) Tissue
I ••• Continued »»•
j Parameter Result Units
| | B/N/Acid Scan Tissue
j I **• Continued •**
j j Parameter Result Units
2-Hexanone 24U ug/kg
cis-1,3-Dichloropropene 12U ug/kg
trans-1,3-Dichloroprope 12U ug/kg
| B/N/Acid Scan
| Parameter
Tissue
Result Units
| VOA - PP Scan (GCMS)
I Parameter
Tissue
Result Units
Carbon Tetrachloride 12U ug/kg
Acetone 1600B ug/kg
ChlocofocB 12U ug/kg
Beniene O.tSJ ug/kg
1,1,1-Trichloroethane 12U ug/kg
BroBoaethane 24U ug/kg
ChloroMethane 24U ug/kg
Chloroethane 24U ug/kg
Vinyl Chloride 24U ug/kg
Nethylene Chloride 31B ug/kg
carbon Disulfide 12U ug/kg
BroBoforB 12U ug/kg
BroBOdichloroaethane 12U ug/kg
1,1-Dichloroethane 12U ug/kg
1,1-Dichloroethene 12U ug/kg
1,2-Dichloropropane 12U ug/kg
2-8utanona 31B ug/kg
1,1,2-Trlchloroethane 12U ug/kg
Trichloroethene 12U ug/kg
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroetha 24U ug/kg
Total Xylenes 12U ug/kg
Ethylbensene 12U ug/kg
Styrene 12U ug/kg
1,2-Dichloroathane 12U ug/kg
Vinyl Acetate 39 ug/kg
4-Nethyl-2-Pentanon* 24U ug/kg
Toluene 12U ug/kg
Chlorobensene 12U ug/kg
2-Chloroethylvinylether 24U ug/kg
DibroBochloroaethane 12U ug/kg
Tetrachloroethene 12U ug/kg
Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene REQ
trans-l,2-Dichloroe than 12U ug/kg
Benio(a)pyrene SOU ug/kg
2,4-Dinitrophenol 300U ug/kg
Dibensola,b)anthracene COU ug/kg
Benso(a)anthracene 60U ug/kg
4-Chloro-3-Hethylphenol COU ug/kg
Bensoic acid 300U ug/kg
Hexachloroethane 60U ug/kg
Hexachlorocyclopentadie COU ug/kg
Isophorone 60U ug/kg
Acenaphthene 60V ug/kg
Diethylphthalate 60U ug/kg
Di-n-Butylphthalate 60U ug/kg
Phenanthrene 60U ug/kg
Butylbensylphthalate COU ug/kg
H-Hitrosodiphenylastine 1200U ug/kg
Fluorene COU ug/kg
Hexachlorobutadiene COU ug/kg
Pentachlorophenol 300U ug/kg
2,4,C-Trichlorophenol COU ug/kg
2-Nitroaniline 300U ug/kg
2-Nitrophenol COU ug/kg
Naphthalene COU ug/kg
2-Methylnaphthalene COU ug/kg
2-Chloronaphthalene COU ug/kg
3,3'-Dichlorobensidine 120U ug/kg
2-Methylphenol COU ug/kg
1,2-Dichlorobensene COU ug/kg
o-Chlorophenol COU ug/kg
2,4,5-Trichlorophenol 300U ug/kg
Nitrobensene COU ug/kg
3-Nitroaniline 300U ug/kg
4-Ritroaniline 300U ug/kg
4-Nitrophenol 300U ug/kg
Benzyl Alcohol 280J ug/kg
4-BroBophenyl-phenyleth COU ug/kg
2,4-DiBethylphenol COU ug/kg
4-Methylphenol COU ug/kg
1,4-Dichlorobencene COU ug/kg
4-Chloroaniline COU ug/kg
Phenol COU ug/kg
bis(2-Chloroethyltether COU ug/kg
bisl2-ChloroethoxyJMeth COU ug/kg
bis(2-Ethylbexyl)Phthal 410 ug/kg
Di-n-Octyl Phthalate COU ug/kg
Hexachlorobensene 60U ug/kg
Anthracene COU ug/kg
1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene COU ug/kg
2,4-Dichlorophenol COU ug/kg
2,4-Dinitrotoluene COU ug/kg
Pyrene SOU ug/kg
Distethylphthalate COU ug/kg
Dibensofuran COU ug/kg
Benco{ghi)perylene COU ug/kg
Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene COU ug/kg
Benso(b)fluoranthene COU ug/kg
rluoranthene COU ug/kg
Benio(k)fluoranthene COU ug/kg
Acenaphthylene COU ug/kg
Chrysene COU ug/kg
4,6-Dinitro-2-Bethylphe 3000 ug/kg
1,3-Dichlorobensene COU ug/kg
2,6-Dinitrotoluene COU ug/kg
H-Nitroso-di-n-Propylaai COU ug/kg
4-Chlorophenyl-phenylet COU ug/kg
bis(2-Chloroisopropyl)E COU ug/kg
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
Tissue
Result Units
4,4'-DDT
ODD, o,p'-
Chlordane
giBBa-BHC (Lindane)
Dieldrin
Endrin
Nethoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4, 4 '-DDE
Heptachlor
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
IU ug/kg
(Continued on next page)
-------
1=
I
00
30-OCT-rM
14:OC;li
•rfljtct: AHB-061A
Station No: BIBl
Sample He: 16 261011
Laboratory: RX
EPA Rsgion X lab Management
Sanple/Project Analytic Results
PUOET SOUND EDIBbE MACROALOAE INVeSTIQAT
••gin Staple D«t«: 16/06/23 : Sourc*: Pl«nt/V*g«t«tion
Dcicciption: *BD IHLT, ULVA, DNR DOCK
42
Officnc: PTC Account) AM(«82F
Depth:
QA Cod«:
I P«»t/PCB - FP Son Tissu*
| ••• Continued ***
| Pac«««t«r Result Unit*
Aldtin
•Ipbi-BHC
beta-BHC
d«lt«-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
•Ipha-Endosulfan
••ptachlor eposide
Bndotulfan aulfate
DDE, o,p»-
Endtin aldehyde
Toxaphene
pea - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 124B
PCB - 1016
beta-Endoiulfan
trans-Monachlor
PCB - 1242
1U ug/kg.
1U ug/kg
lu ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
Co«pi«t«!
-------
station Not »IC1
Saaple Ho: »6 2610(2
Laboratory: RX
BOXB&B M*.e»o»«,a*.« XBTBBTXOAT
Begin Sssple Date: 86/06/23 : Source; Plant/Vegetation
Description: BD IRLT, ULVA, BOSTON HRBR
Depth:
fcc=cai4ntl
QA Code:
vo
| Metsls - Specified
j parameter
Arsenic As-Tiss
Mercury Hg-Tiss
Lead Pb-Tiss
Copper Cu-Tiss
Zinc Zn-Tiss
Chrosiiusi Cr-Tiss
C»d»iu» Cd-Tiss
| Pest/PCB - PP Scan
| Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD , o , p ' -
Chlordane
gasisia-BHC (Lindane) ,
Dieldrin
Endrin
Nethoxychlor
4,4 --DDD
4,4 '-DDE
Heptschlor
Aldrin
alpha-BHC
beta-BHC
delta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Endosulfan
Heptachlor epoxide
Endosulfan sulfate
DDE , o ,p ' -
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphene
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
beta-Endosulfan
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
Tissue
Result Units
0.59 mg/kg-wt
0.001 sig/kg-wt
0.005 »g/kg-wt
1.76 ag/kg-wt
3.3 ag/kg-wt
0.50 ag/kg-wt
0.147 ag/kg-wt
Tissue
Result Units
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
3 ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
30U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10U ug/kg
10U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
1U ug/kg
100 ug/kg
(Sanpl* Coaplat*!
-------
3D-OCT-87
14:06:55
Projact: AMB-061A
station No: BID1
Saapla Mo: 86 261084
Laboratory: RX
EPA Ragion X Lab Managasiant Systaa
Sa>pl*/Projact Analysis Rasults
PUCET SOUND EDIBLE MACROALGAE INVESTXGAT
Begin Saipla Data: $6/06/23 : Sourca: Plant/Vagatation
Daacription: BD IHLT, ULVA, COOPER POINT
Paga 44
Otficar: DTE Account: AMLB2F
Dapth:
gA Coda:
I Hatala - Spacifiad
I Parastatar
Tiaaua |
Rasult Onita j
Araanic As-Tiss
Marcury Hg-Tiss
Laad Pb-Tlas
Coppar Cu-Tiaa
Sine Xn-Tias
Chroaiuai Cr-Tiss
CadaiuB Cd-Tias
| Past/PCB - PP Scan
j Parameter
4, 4 '-DDT
ODD, O ,p* -
Chlordana
gast«a~BHC (Lindana)
Dialdrin
Endrin
Mathoxychlor
4,4'-DDD
4. 4 '-DDE
Haptachlor
Aldrin
alpba-BHC
bata-BHC
dalta-BHC
DDT, o,p'-
alpha-Bndosulf an
Haptacblor apoxida
Endoaultan sulfata
DOB, o,p'-
Endrin aldehyde
Toxaphana
PCB - 1260
PCB - 1254
PCB - 1221
PCB - 1232
PCB - 1248
PCB - 1016
bata-Endosulf an
trans-Nonachlor
PCB - 1242
0.47 aig/kg-wt
O.OOio ng/kg-wt
0.195 atg/kg-wt
2.44 M/kg-wt
1.7 aig/kg-wt
0.21 ng/kg-wt
0.146 »g/kg-wt
Tiasua |
Raault Onita j
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10O ug/kg
1O ug/kg
3 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1O ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1O ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1O ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
1O ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
300 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
10O ug/kg
10O ug/kg
10 ug/kg
10 ug/kg
100 ug/kg
(Sanpl* Co»pl»t»)
-------
APPENDIX 8
DATA LISTINGS FOR CHEMICALS OF CONCERN IN PUGET SOUND SEAFOOD
-------
TABLES
Number
B-l Data listing for arsenic (ug/kg wet) in Puget Sound fish,
shellfish, and macroalgae B'3
B-2 Data listing for cadmium (ug/kg wet) in Puget Sound fish,
shellfish, and macroalgae B'9
B-3 Data listing for lead (ug/kg wet) in Puget Sound fish,
shellfish, and macroalgae B'15
B-4 Data listing for mercury (ug/kg wet) in Puget Sound fish,
shellfish, and macroalgae B'21
B-5 Data listing for carcinogenic PAH (ug/kg wet) in Puget
Sound fish, shellfish, and macroalgae B-zs
B-6 Data listing for PCBs (ug/kg wet) in Puget Sound fish,
shellfish, and macroalgae B'*H
B-7 Data listing for alpha-HCH (ug/kg wet) in Puget Sound fish,
shellfish, and macroalgae "*••"
B-8 Data listing for ODD, DOE, and DDT (ug/kg wet) in Puget
Sound fish, shellfish, and macroalgae B'JO
-------
DESCRIPTION OF DATA FIELDS
Project. Acronyms used for the various studies from which the data
were compiled are:
EPA/DSHS
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDOE
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EH
DSHS
NOAA1
NOAA2
WOO El
WDOE2
The 1986 U.S. EPA and DSHS study of chemical contaminants
in shellfish (Appendix A)
The 1987 U.S. EPA and WDF study of chemicals contaminants
in salmon (Appendix A)
The 1987 U.S. EPA and Ecology study of chemical
contaminants in macroalgae (Appendix A)
The U.S. EPA Urban Bay Action Program for toxic
substances in fish from Elliott Bay (PTI and Tetra Tech
1988a)
The U.S. EPA Urban Bay Action Program for toxic
substances in fish and crabs from Everett Harbor (PTI
and Tetra Tech 1988b)
The DSHS study of chemical contaminants in shellfish
(Faigenblum 1988)
Preliminary report for the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration study of potential toxicant
exposure among consumers of fish caught recreationally
in Puget Sound (Landolt et al. 1985).
Final report for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration study of potential toxicant exposure
among consumers of fish caught recreationally in Puget
Sound (Landolt et al. 1987).
Ecology survey of chemical contaminants in shellfish
from Eagle Harbor (Yake et al. 1984)
Ecology survey of chemical contaminants in shellfish
from Budd Inlet (Norton, D., 5 February 1986, personal
communication).
Area. Geographical area where the sample was collected.
Species. Common name of the species analyzed. Scientific names are
provided in Table 2 of the report.
Data field. The data field is identified by the name of the substance
being reported. Acronyms used for chemical names were:
Benzo(a)anthracene
B(A)A
B-l
-------
Benzo(b)fluoranthene - B(b)F
Benzo(a)pyrene - B(a)P
All values are reported in units of ug/kg wet wt. Quantitation limits
are reported for substances that were not detected.
5. Detection Limits. Substances that were not detected are indicated by a
"IT in the detection limit field. When a "U" appears in this field,
the corresponding data value represents the detection limit for that
substance.
6. Data Quality. Symbols used to describe data quality concerns are:
J - Estimated value for one of the following reasons: compound
verified by not quantified because value exceeded the five-
point calibration curve, compound is tentatively identified,
response factor may be low, standard was not with the allowed
25 percent response-factor difference
M - Compound verified below quantification limit. Substances
with this qualifier were reported at the quantification limit
and assigned a "U" in the detection limit field. An "M"
qualifier did not affect selection of data based on data
quality objectives.
B - Compound detected in associated blank.
G - Geometric mean
B-2
-------
TABLE •-!. DATA UIBTINO FOR AMBENIC (UO/KO MET)
PUOET SOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND MACKOALOAE
IN
DO
(A)
Project
EPA/08H8
EPA/D8HB
EPA/08H8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/DBH8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/DBHS
EPA/08H8
EPA/DBHS
EPA/D8H8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/DBH8
EPA/08HS
EPA/DBHS
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBH8
EPA/DBHS
EPA/DBHS
EPA/DBHB
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDQE
EPA/UDQE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDQE
EPA/UOOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDQE
EPA/UDQE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/UDQE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
Aria
Dash Point
Da id Point
Everatt Harbor
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Quartermaster Harbor
Daah Point
Everatt Harbor
Mukiltao
Sinclair Inlet
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Burley Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Everett Harbor
Mukiltao
Mukiltao
Sinclair Inlet
Quartermaster Harbor
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Commencement Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlet
Budd InUt
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Elliott Bay
8p«ci««
Bvntnoi* cla«
B«ntno«» clan
Sand cla«
Littlanack clam
Littl«n*ck claai
Littltntck cla«
Littltnack clan
Littlanack clmm
LittUnack cla*
Littlcnack clan
Butter clan
Buttar clan
Butter clmm
Buttar claa
Buttar clam
Buttar clan
Buttar claet
Buttar claai
Hani la clam
Laminar ia
Laminaria
Laminar La
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Naraocyiti*
Naraocytti*
Naraocyitii
Naraocyitit
Naraocyitia
Naraocyttit
Naraocyatit
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulv*
Nori
Dat. Data
Araanic Limit dual.
1 . 900. 00
2. 6OO. OO
1,400 OO
2. 300. OO
1.200. OO
2. 700. 00
2. 100. OO
2. SOO. OO
1,600.00
2, 200. OO
3, 300. 00
1.700.00
2. 400. OO
4. 200. 00
2, 300. 00
1. BOO. 00
1.600. 00
4. 900. 00
3. 100. 00
4. 200. 00
4, SOO. OO
9. 200. OO
S. SOO. OO
2, 700. OO
4, 290. OO
3. 380. OO
7, SOO. 00
4. 790. OO
1. 990. 00
3, 600. 00
3. 390. OO
3. 980. OO
2. 600. 00
4. 490. 00
3. 39O. OO
940. OO
340. OO
990. OO
470. OO
1.240.00
2. 780. OO
1. 190. OO
940.00
730. OO
960. OO
900. 00
430. OO
410. 00
680. OO
820 OO
1, 370 OO
1. 1OO. 00
3. 080 OO
-------
TABLE B-l. DATA LISTING FOR ARSENIC (UO/KO MET) IN
PUOET BOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND HACROALOAE
00
Projact
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDF
EPA/MDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
DBMS
DBHB
D8H8
DSHB
DSH8
DSHB
DSHB
DSHB
DSH8
DSHS
DSHB
DSHS
DSHB
DSHS
DSHS
DSHB
DSHB
DSHS
DSHS
DSHB
DBHS
Araa
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Anacortat
Anacorta*
Commancamant Bay
Commancimant Ban
CoMancamant Bay
CoMancemant Bay
Coautancamant Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Evaratt Harbor
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Commancamant Bag
CoMancamant Bag
Dash Point
Birch Bag
Budtf Inlat
Datk Point
Dash Point
Da»h Point
Budd Inltt
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Birch Bag
Birch Bay
Birch Bay
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Budd InUt
Budd Inlet
Bpaclat
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook caiman
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook saloon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook talaion
Chinook salmon
Chinook salaion
Chinook salmon
Coho talaion
Coho talnon
Haart cockla
M. inquinata
N. inquinata
H. inqulnata
Bantnosa claai
Bantnota claai
Softthall clam
Littlanack clan
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlvnack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlinack clam
Littltnack clam
Littlenack clam
Littl*nack clam
Littlcnack clam
Oat. Data
Artanic Limit dual.
3, 2OO. 00
3. B80 00
2, 730. 00
990. OO
470. OO
2. OOO. 00
640 OO
39O. OO
1.900. OO
9OO. OO
1.900. OO
710.00
1. 1OO. OO
340. OO
1.010. OO
1.900. OO
900.00
400. OO
1.900. OO
3. 200. OO
1.2OO. OO
1.6OO. OO
930. OO
970. OO
430. OO
880. OO
660.00
210.OO
190. OO
380. OO
2. 1OO. OO
a. too. oo
1.4OO. OO
1.720.00
2. O70. OO
3. 760. OO
3. 460. OO
4. 980. 00
1.330. OO
1.B9O. OO
3, 290. 00
3. 500. 00
2. 100. OO
2. 220. 00
2. 420. OO
3. 170. OO
2. 300. 00
2. 110 00
2. 370 00
2. 850 00
4,060. 00
3, 220. OO
2, 130. OO
-------
TABLE B-l. DATA LISTING FOR ARSENIC IN
PUOET SOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND MACRQALOAE
CO
I
en
Projtct
D8HS
DSH8
DSH8
D8HS
D8HS
D8H8
D6HS
D8H8
08H8
D8HB
DBH8
D8HB
DSH8
D8H8
D8H8
DBMS
D8H8
DBMS
D8HS
D8H8
D8HB
DSH8
DSHS
DSH8
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHB
DSHS
DBHS
D8HB
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DBHS
DSHS
DBHS
DBHS
DBHS
NQAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
Area
Budd Inltt
Budd Inltt
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Daih Point
Daih Point
Dash Point
Mukilteo
Mukilteo
Mukiltao
Mukiltao
Mukiltao
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inltt
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Birch Bag
Budd Inltt
Burltg Lagoon
Burltg Lagoon
Burltg Lagoon
Burltg Lagoon
Burltg Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Daih Point
Daih Point
Mukiltto
Mukiltto
Mukiltao
Mukiltao
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inltt
Budd Inltt
Budd Inltt
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Alki Point
Quartermaster Harbor
Sinclair Inltt
Edmonds
Edmonds
Edmonds
Elliott Bag
Edmonds
Sptcias
Littltnack clam
Littltntck clam
Littlanack clam
Llttlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littltntck clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littltntck clam
Littltnack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Buttar clam
Butttr clam
Butttr clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Butttr clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Butttr clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Butttr clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Manila clam
Manila clam
Manila clam
Manila clam
Horttntck clam
Horstntck clan
Horstntck clam
Pacific hakt
Stripad perch
Striptd perch
Rockf ish
Rockf i«h
Det. Data
Arsenic Limit dual.
3. 120. OO
8, 420. OO
3, 700. 00
4. O30. OO
3, 640. 00
2.810. OO
3. 360. OO
3. 680. OO
1 , 980. 00
1.900. 00
2, 400. 00
2, 020. 00
1.470. OO
1.260. OO
1.920.00
3. 600. OO
2. OOO. OO
2. 270. 00
2, 130. OO
1,900 00
4. 900. 00
2. 980. OO
2. 120. OO
3. 330. 00
1.990. 00
2. 460. 00
2. 720. 00
3. 490. OO
2. 960. 00
2. 690. 00
4, 970. 00
9. 220. OO
3. 080. 00
2. 390. OO
1.690. OO
2. 240. OO
2. 080. 00
2. 200. 00
3. 470. OO
4. BOO. 00
3. 140. 00
3. 110. 00
1 , 990. 00
1.960. OO
4. 060. 00
1 . S30. OO
1, 990. OO
2. 680. 00
4. 090. 00
600. OO
400. 00
1, ZOO OO
2, 4OO OO
-------
TABLE 9-1. DATA LISTING FOR ARSENIC (UO/KO WET) IN
PUOET BOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND HACROALOAE
CO
i
Projtct
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAAI
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAAI
NOAA1
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAt
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAt
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAt
NOAAt
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAt
NOAAI
NOAAt
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAt
NOAAI
Area
Edmonds
EdMondi
Edmonds
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inlot
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inltt
Ed*ondt
Edmonds
CosMStnctmtnt Bay
Coswstnctmtnt Bay
Commtnctmtnt Bay
CoMtnctmtnt Bay
CoMstnctmtnt Bay
Commtnctmtnt Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inltt
Edmonds
Edmonds
Edmonds
Edmonds
Edmonds
Edmonds
Commtnctmtnt Bay
Commtnctmtnt Bay
Comstnctmtnt Bay
Elliott Bag
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inlet
Sptciti
Rockfith
Rockflsh
Rockfish
Sabltfish
Bablafish
Bablaflth
Babltfish
Babltfish
Sabltfish
Sabloflsh
Sabltfish
Bablafith
Bablsfith
Sabltfish
Babltfish
8abltfi»h
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Toncod
Toaicod
English »olt
English tola
English solo
English sola
English sol*
English solo
English solt
English sola
English solt
English solo
English solo
English solt
English solt
English solt
English solt
English solt
English solt
English solt
English solt
English solt
English solt
Pacific sanddab
Rock solt
Rock solt
Rock solt
Rock solt
Rock solt
Rock solt
Dtt. Data
Arsonic Limit dual.
1.7OO. OO
i. too. oo
1.84O. OO
BOO. OO
l.&OO. OO
9OO. OO
60O 00
1.3OO. OO
2. 9OO 00
3. 9OO. OO
t.OOO. 00
2. 90O. OO
2. 3OO. OO
600.00
9. 30O. OO
6OO. OO
2.000.00
3, 6OO. OO
9. 4OO. OO
12. 600. 00
9. BOO. OO
3.6OO. OO
2.OOO.OO
820.00
4. O2O. OO
14, 030. OO
16. 900. OO
20. 400. 00
2O. 24O. OO
1, BOO. 00
6. 9OO. OO
3, BOO. OO
3, 40O. OO
4. 20O. 00
3. 02O. OO
9, 9OO. 00
7. 1OO. OO
9. 700. 00
It, 100.00
2, 10O. OO
3. 900. OO
1,800. OO
1 , 300. OO
l.OOO.OO
1, 400. OO
1,900.00
20, 70O. 00
7, 700. 00
20, 60O. 00
2, 900 00
5, 340. 00
9, 000. 00
19, 6OO. OO
-------
TABUC B>-i. DATA LIBTTINO FOR ARBBN1C (UOXKB MKTt
PUOET BOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AMD MACROALOAg
IN
03
I
Projtct
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NQAA1
NOAA1
NQAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NQAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NDAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NC1AA2
Area
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Edmonds
Edmondt
Edmondt
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bag
Edmondt
Edmonds
Edmondt
Edmonds
Edmonds
Commencement Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Point Jefferson
Point Jefferson
Point Jefferson
Point Jefferson
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Edmonds
Edmondt
Edmonds
Edmondt
Edmondi
Agate Pact
Agate Pas*
Agate Pats
Agate Pact
Point Haditon
Point Haditon
Point Mad it on
Manchester
Manchester
Manchester
Manchester
Point Jefferson
'Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Point Madison
Point Madison
Point Maditon
Point Maditon
Point Madison
Point Madison
faint Madison
Bpeclet
Rock tole
Rock sole
Rock sole
Rock tola
Rock sol*
Rock sole
Buffalo tculpin
Market squid
Market squid
Market squid
Market squid
Market squid
Market tquid
Market tquid
Pacific hake
Pacific hake
Pacific hake
Pacific hake
Pacific hake
Pacific hake
Pacific hake
Rockfith
Rockfish
Rockfith
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfish
Sablef ish
Bablefish
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Wallege pollock
Uallege pollock
Wallege pollock
Wallege pollock
Wallege pollock
Wallege pollack
Wallege pollock
Tomcod
Tomcod
Det. Data
Arsenic Limit dual.
6. 900. 00
16. 3OO. OO
6. 900. OO
3. 40O. OO
2i 70O. OO
1. 20O.OO
1,000.00
6. 900. 00
6. 400. OO
4. 400. 00
B. 700. 00
5. 400. 00
22, 100. 00
4, 600. 00
3, 200. 00
2, 900. 00
900. 00
1 , 000. 00
1,400 00
3, 900. 00
1 , BOO. 00
1.90O. OO
800. 00
2, BOO. OO
2, OOO OO
1.20O. OO
1,300.00
BOO. OO
2, 300. 00
2, 200. 00
1.7OO. 00
1,900 00
2, 40O. 00
2. 1OO. OO
1. 10O. 00
2, 90O. 00
8OO. OO
1,700. 00
3, 500 00
9. 400. 00
4, 000. 00
9, 400. OO
7OO. OO
3. 400. 00
1 1 , 4OO. OO
9. 400. OO
1,400 00
1, 1OO. 00
4, 400 00
a. soo. oo
2, 300. 00
1, 100. 00
1,400. 00
-------
TABLE B-l. DATA LIBTINO FOR ARSENIC (UO/KO WET) IN
PUOET BOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND HACROALOAE
03
00
Project
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA3
NOAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA3
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
MDOE1
WDOE1
UDOE1
MDOE1
MOOE1
WDOE1
MDOEt
UDOE1
UDOE1
Aroa
Point Madioon
CoMoncomont Bag
CoMoncomont Bay
CoMoncomont Bog
CoMonconont Bag
Sinclair Inlot
Sinclair Inlot
Sinclair Inlot
Sinclair Inlot
Elliott Bag
Elliott Boy
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bog
Edotond*
Edaiondt
Edaond*
Edaondt
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Sinclair Inlot
Sinclair Inlot
Edaondt
Eaglt Harbor
Eaglo Horbor
Eaglo Harbor
Eaglo Harbor
Eaglo Harbor
Eaglo Harbor
Eaglo Harbor
Eaglo Harbor
Point Blakolg
Bpociot
ToMCod
Starrg floundor
Starrg floundor
Starrg floundor
Starrg floundor
Starrg floundor
Btarrg floundor
Starrg floundor
Starrg floundor
Rock iolo
Rock oolo
Rock solo
Rock tolo
Rock tolo
Rock tolo
Rock tola
Rock tola
Markat squid
Markot squid
Harkot squid
Markot squid
Markot oquid
Markat squid
Bivalvo tpp.
Bivalvo tpp.
Bivalvo tpp.
Bivalvo »pp.
Bivalvo «pp.
Bivalvo opp.
Bivalvo opp.
Bivalvo opp.
Bivalve opp.
Dot. Dota
Anonlc Limit Qual.
SCO. OO
2.600. OO
l.OOO. OO
500. OO
BOO. 00
1.7OO. OO
2. 2OO. OO
i.aoo. oo
1.200. OO
2. 400. OO
3, 300. OO
4. 3OO. 00
3. 9OO. OO
3. BOO. OO
3. 200. 00
3. 700. OO
2. ZOO. 00
il.BOO. OO
19.900.00
1.300. OO
1.300. OO
4. 4OO. OO
3. 600. OO
2, 300. OO
1. 900. OO
2, 600. 00
3. 1OO. 00
3. 3OO. OO
3, BOO. OO
4. 4OO. 00
2. 9OO. OO
3. 7OO. OO
-------
TABLE m-». DATA LIBTINO POM CADMIUM
-------
TABLE B-2. DATA L18TINO FOR CAQMIUn (UO/KO WET) IN
PUOET SOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AMP MACROALCAE
CD
i
Project
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UOF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UOF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
DBMS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DBHS
DSHS
DSHB
DSHS
DSHS
DSHB
DBHS
DSHS
D8HB
DSHB
DBHB
DSHB
DBHS
DSHS
DBHS
DBHS
DSHS
Area
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Anacortes
Anacortes
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Dash Point
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Dash Point
Dash Point
Dash Point
Budd Inlet
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alhi Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Birch Bay
Birch Bay
Birch Bag
Birch Bay
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Specie*
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Coho salmon
Coho salmon
Heart cockle
H. inquinata
H. inquinata
M. inquinata
Bentnose clam
Bentnosa clam
Softshell clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littlvnecb clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Oet Data
Cadmium Limit 0u«l-
155. 00
62.00
85. OO
222.00
394.00
207. OO
2.00 U
2.00 U
8. OO
5. OO
8.00
9. OO
3. OO
9. OO
5.00
9. OO
1O. OO
3. OO
5.00
2.00 U
9. OO
13.00
4.00
10.00
13. OO
4. OO
4.00
3. OO
14.00
8. OO
2. OO U
5.00
ISO. OO
140. OO
551. OO
1.280. OO
4O. OO
80. OO
77O. OO
7O. OO
300.00
349. 00
104. OO
340. 00
47O. OO
38O. OO
220. 00
280 OO
364. OO
2BO OO
330 OO
31O. OO
1BO. OO
-------
TABLE B-2. DATA LISTING FOR CADMIUM (DO/KG MET) IN
PUOET SOUND FISH. SHELLFISH, AND MACROALOAE
CXI
I
Project
DSH8
D8H8
DSH8
D8HS
DSHB
DBHB
D8HB
DSHB
DSHB
DBHS
DBHB
DBHS
DBMS
D8HS
DBHS
DSHB
DBHB
DSHB
D8H8
DSHS
DSHS
D8HS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHB
DSHB
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHB
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHB
DSHB
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DBHS
DSHB
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
Area
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlet
Burlag Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Dash Point
Dash Point
Dash Point
Mukilteo
Mukilteo
Mukilteo
Mufcilteo
Mukilteo
Mukilteo
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Birch Bag
Birch Bag
Budd Inlet
Burleg Lagoon
Burleg Lagoon
Burleg Lagoon
Burleg Lagoon
Burleg Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Dash Point
Dash Point
Mukilteo
Mukilteo
Mukilteo
Mukilteo
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlat
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Alki Point
Species
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck ciam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littlenack clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck ctam
Littleneck clam
Littleneck clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Manila clam
Manila clam
Manila clam
Manila clam
Horseneck clam
Det. Data
Cadmium Limit Qual.
439. OO
432.00
390. OO
330. OO
390. OO
35O. OO
450.00
274. 00
309. OO
4OO. OO
560. OO
SOO. OO
400. OO
360. OO
340. OO
270. 00
230. OO
447. 00
200.OO
310. OO
220. OO
150. OO
238. OO
230. 00
240. OO
350.00
40. OO
70. OO
387.00
170. OO
190. OO
120.OO
86.00
197. 00
80. OO
120.OO
1OO. OO
97.OO
1O4. OO
116.00
90. OO
180. OO
126. OO
118. OO
196. OO
140. 00
74.00
91. OO
327. OO
360. 00
3OO. OO
17. OO
210. OO
-------
«-2. RATA MBTf
BOUN.P FISH,
CARMIUM
-------
TABLE B-a. DATA LIBTINC FOR CADMIUM (UO/K9 UET> IN
PUCET SOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND HACROAL0AE
03
h~"
CO
Projtct
NOAAt
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAAi
NOAA1
NOAAi
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAAt
NOAAI
NOAAI
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
Art*
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Edmund*
Edmonds
Edmonds
Coamancement Bay
Coalmen cement Bay
Coaiman cement Bag
Edmonds
Edmonds
Edmonds
Edmonds
EdMondi
Commencement Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Point Jafferton
Point Jeffarton
Point Jefferton
Point Jefferton
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Edmonds
EdMondt
Edmonds
Edmonds
Edmondt
Agata Past
Agata Pact
Agata Past
Agata Patt
Point Madison
Point Madison
Point Maditon
Manchttttr
Manchester
Manchester
Manchester
Point Jefferson
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Point Madison
Point Madison
Point Madison
Point Madison
Point Madison
Species
Rock cola
Rock sole
Rock sole
Rock tola
Rock sole
Rock sole
Rock sole
Buffalo sculpin
Market squid
Market squid
Market squid
Market squid
Markat squid
Market squid
Market squid
Pacific haka
Pacific haka
Pacific haka
Pacific haka
Pacific haka
Pacific haka
Pacific haka
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockflth
Sablefith
Sablafith
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Wallage pollock
Mallage pollock
Mallege pollock
Mallage pollock
Mallege policed
Mallege pollock
Walleye pollock
Det. Data
Cadmium Limit Qua!
. 00 U
. 00 U
.00 U
. OO U
. OO
.00 u
. 00 U
2. OO
4.00
63. OO
9. OO
37.00
2. 00
12.00
290. 00
3. 00
20.00
11.00
9. 00
20.00
19. 00
4.00
4.00
10.00
4. OO
2.00
12.00
4. 00
10. OO
16. OO
20. OO
7. 00
13. 00
6. 00
20. 00
7. OO
4. OO
9. 00
23. OO
19. OO
1. 00
8. OO
9. OO
19. OO
10. 00
2. 00
4. 00
9. 00
2. OO
4. OO
6. 00
3. OO
3. 00
-------
TABLE B-2. DATA LISTING FOR CADMIUM (UO/KO MET) IN
PUGET SOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND MACROALOAE
OO
i
Project
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAAS
NOAA2
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
MDOE1
MDOE1
WDOE1
UDOE1
WDOEt
HDOEt
WOOE1
WDOE1
UDOE1
Art*
Point Mad it on
Point Mad lion
Point Mad i ton
Co««tnce«ent Bag
Cowsenceaent Bay
Coaaanceaent Bay
Coaaoncoaent Bay
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Edaonds
Edaonds
Edaonds
Edaonds
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inlet
Edaonds
Edaonds
Eagli Harbor
Eagli Harbor
Eagle Harbor
Eaglt Harbor
Eaglt Harbor
Eagle Harbor
Eagle Harbor
Eagl* Harbor
Point Blakely
Species
ToMcod
Toacod
To*cod
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Rock sole
Rock tola
Rock sole
Rock sole
Rock sole
Rock tole
Rock sol*
Rock mole
Market squid
Market squid
Market squid
Market squid
Market squid
Market squid
Market squid
Bivalve spp.
Bivalve spp.
Bivalve spp.
Bivalve spp.
Bivalve spp.
Bivalve spp.
Bivalve spp.
Bivalve spp.
Bivalve spp.
Det. Data
Cadaiua Limit dual.
2. OO
IS. OO
4. OO
2.00
9.00
3. OO
3. OO
10. OO
4. OO
3. OO
7. OO
S. OO
2. OO
6.00
80.00
3. OO
4.00
11. OO
4.00
39.0O
41.00
32. OO
17. OO
26 OO
180.00
a. oo
140. OO
140. OO
39O. 00
110. OO
90. OO
BO. OO
130. 00
290. OO
11O. OO
-------
TAWJC B-a. DATA LISTiNO ran LEAD
-------
TABLE i-3 DATA LISTINO FOR LEAP (UO/MB MET)
PUGET SOUND FISH. gHgLLFIBH* AND HACHQALBAE
IN
DO
I
Ot
Project
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
EPA/UDF
D8H8
DBMS
DSH8
D8H8
DBHB
OBHB
DBMS
DBHS
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
D8HB
D3H5
DBHB
DSHS
Area
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Anacortos
Anacortos
Commoncomont Bag
Commoncomont Bag
Commoncomont Bag
Commoncomont Bag
Commoncomont Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Evorott Harbor
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
CoMonc omont Bag
Commoncomont Bag
Dash Point
Birch Bag
Budd Inlot
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Birch Bag
Birch Bag
Birch Bag
Birch Bag
Budd Inlot
Budd Inltt
Budd Inltt
Budd Inlot
auartormastor Harbor
auartormastor Harbor
Quartormattir Harbor
Quartormatttr Harbor
Oath Point
Dath Point
Bpocios
Nori
Nori
Norl
Nori
Norl
Nori
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook saloon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Coho salmon
Coho salmon
Hoart cockl*
H. inquinata
Boftsholl clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlanock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Littlonock clam
Load
240.00
140. 00
9.00
9. OO
9. OO
9. OO
1O. OO
1O. OO
10. OO
10. OO
10. OO
10. OO
1O. OO
10. oo
10. OO
200.00
90.00
9O. OO
90. OO
160. OO
9O. OO
13O. OO
10. OO
to. oo
10.00
10. oo
10. oo
10. oo
10. oo
10. OO
10. oo
to. oo
23O. OO
27O. OO
27O. OO
4O. OO
12O. OO
SO OO
9O OO
40. 00
40. 00
40. 00
4O. OO
40. OO
90. OO
60. OO
10O. 00
40. OO
BO 00
140 00
140 00
100 00
90. 00
Dot. Data
Limit Qual.
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
-------
TABLE •-a. DATA LISTING FOR LEAD (UO/KO MET> IN
PUOET SOUND FISH, SHELLFISH. AND MACftfMLOAE
CD
I
Project
DBMS
08H8
DBMS
DBMS
OBH8
DBH8
OSH8
DBMS
D8HS
DBMS
DSHB
DBMS
DBMS
DBHB
DBMS
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBH8
DBHB
DSHS
DBHB
DBHS
DSHS
DBHB
DBHB
DSHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHS
DBHB
NQAA1
NQAA1
NOAA1
NQAA1
NQAA1
NQAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NQAA1
NOAA1
NQAA1
NQAA1
NOAA1
NQAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NOAA1
NQAA1
NQAA1
Area
Mukilteo
Mukilteo
Mukilteo
Huklltto
Sinclair InUt
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair InUt
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Birch Bag
Birch Bag
Budd Inltt
Burleg Lagoon
Burltg Lagoon
Burleg Lagoon
Burltg Lagoon
Quarttrmaf ter Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Daeh Point
Dath Point
Mukilteo
Mukilteo
Mukiltoo
Mukilteo
Sinclair InUt
Sinclair InUt
Sinclair InUt
Budd Inltt
Budd InUt
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermaster Harbor
Quartermacter Harbor
Edmond*
Edmond •
Edmond*
Elliott Bay
Edmondi
Edmonds
Edmonds
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Specie*
Littleneck clam
LittUnack clam
Littleneck clam
LittUnack clam
LittUntck clara
LittUntck clam
LittUnack clam
Butttr clam
Butttr clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butttr clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam •
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Manila clam
Manila clam
Manila clam
Manila clam
Horienack clam
Pacific hake
Striped perch
Striped perch
Rockfith
Rockfith
RocMlth
Rockfith
Sablefiih
SabU#i«h
BabUfiih
Bablef i»h
Sablef l«h
Bablefish
Safalefish
Sabl«f i«h
Sabltfiih
Sablef i*h
Bablefish
Sablef ich
Pacific cot'
Lead
40. OO
40. 00
40.00
90.00
180.00
120. 00
120. OO
170. 00
200. OO
40.00
40.00
40. OO
130.00
140. OO
90.00
40.00
120. 00
420. 00
380.00
130. OO
320. 00
120. 00
110. 00
80.00
90.00
260.00
280. 00
290. 00
100. OO
110.00
190.00
1 10. 00
300. OO
13 00
180. 00
1O. OO
12.00
16.00
1O. OO
30. 00
13.00
14. 00
10.00
10. OO
10. OO
13. OO
B. 00
20. 00
10.00
10. OO
10. OO
10. 00
19. OO
Det. Data
Limit Qua!
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
-------
TABLE B-3. DATA LISTING FOR LEAD
-------
TAftUE t-3. DATA LlBVTINO PON LEAD CUO/HO WBT> IN
PUOET SOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND MACROALOAE
CD
I
Project
NQAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NDAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAAS
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
Area
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Edmondt
Edaondt
Edaondt
Edmondt
Edaondt
Agata Pat*
Agata Pat*
Agate Patt
Agata Patt
Point Madison
Point Maditon
Point Maditon
Manchotter
Manchester
Manchetter
Mancbatttr
Point Jefferson
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Point Maditon
Point Maditon
Point Maditon
Point Maditon
Point Maditon
Point Maditon
Point Maditon
Point Mad i ton
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bay
Edmonds
Edmonds
Edmonds
Edmonds
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Sinclair Inlet
Bpeciet
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Bablaf ith
Bablafith
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Uallage pollock
Walleye pollock
Mallaga pollock
Uallaya pollock
Walleye pollock
Uallaga pollock
Uallaga pollock
Toncod
Tomcod
Tomcod
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Rock tola
Rock tola
Rock >ole
Rock tola
Rack tale
Rock tole
Rock tole
Rock tole
Market iqujd
Market squid
Market squid
Market squid
Lead
10.00
3. OO
8.00
23.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
2 00
2.00
2.00
1. 00
4.00
7. 00
4. 00
2.00
1. OO
2.00
1.00
2. 00
1. 00
2.00
9.00
3. 00
4.00
12.00
1.00
1.00
. 00
.00
3.00
.OO
.00
.00
.00
.00
2.00
1.00
2.00
2.00
2. OO
2. 00
2.00
3.00
6. OO
2.00
2. 00
2. OO
7.00
8. OO
2. 00
2. 00
2. OO
2. 00
Oat. Data
Liaiit Qual.
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
-------
TABLE B-3. DATA LISTINO FOR LEAD (UO/HO WET) IN
PUOET BOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND MACROALCAE
Project
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
UOOEl
UDOEI
WDOEI
UDOEI
UDOEI
UDOEI
UDOEI
UDOEI
UDOEI
Art*
Sinclair Inltt
Ed«ondt
Edaondt
Eagle Harbor
Eagle Harbor
Eagla Harbor
Eaglt Harbor
Eagla Harbor
Eagla Harbor
Eagla Harbor
Eagla Harbor
Point Blakalg
Species
Market squid
Market squid
Market squid
Bivalve >pp.
Bivalve spp.
Bivalve >pp.
Bivalve «pp.
Bivalve spp.
Bivalve tpp.
Bivalve «pp.
Bivalve ipp.
Bivalve tpp.
Det.
Lead Limit
a. oo u
8.00
2. OO U
490. OO
1.320. OO
1.030.00
1.980.00
430. OO
990. OO
490. OO
430. OO
380.00
Data
Qual.
CD
I
ro
o
-------
TABLE 8-4 DATA LISTINO fOU HEftCURY (UO/KO WET I IN
PUQET SOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND MACROALOAE
co
tsj
Project
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DSH8
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/MDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDQE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDQE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/HDO€
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDQE
Araa
Dath Point
Dath Point
Evaratt Harbor
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Quartarmaitar Harbor
Da»h Point
Evaritt Harbor
Hukiltao
Sinclair Inlat
Alkl Point
Birch Bay
Burlay Lagoon
Quartarmaitar Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Hukiltao
Hukiltao
Sinclair Inlat
Quartarmattar Harbor
Commancamant Bay
Commancamtnt Bay
Commancamtnt Bay
Commancamant Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Commancamant Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Budd Inlat
Budd Inlat
Budd Inlat
Budd Inlat
Commancamtnt Bay
Commancamant B«y
Commancamant Bay
Conmancamant Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Point No Point
Point No Point
feint No Point
Elliott Bay
Spaciaa Marcury
Bantnota clam 92. OO
Bantnota clam 31. OO
Band clam 3O. OO
Littlanack clam 10. OO
Littlanack clam 9. OO
Littlanack clam 14.00
Littlanack clam 7. OO
Littlanack clam 12. OO
Littlanack clam 3.00
Littlanack clam 19. OO
Buttar clam 8. OO
Buttar clam l.OO
Buttar clam 4. OO
Buttar clam 16. OO
Buttar clam 10. OO
Buttar clam 4. OO
Buttar clam l.OO
Buttar clam 21. OO
Manila clam 14. 00
Laminaria l.OO
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Naraocytti*
Naraocyt tit
Naraocyttii
Naraocyatit
Naraocyati*
Naraocycti*
Naraocyctit
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
.OO
.OO
.OO
. 00
.00
.00
.00
.00
. 00
.00
. 00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
J. OO
. 00
. oo
Ulva 2. OO
Ulva 13. OO
Ulva 3. OO
Ulva 2.00
Ulva 8. OO
Ulva 4. 00
Ulva 3. OO
Ulva l.OO
Ulva 1.00
Ulva 2. OO
Ulva 2. OO
Ulva 4.00
Ulva l.OC
Mori 1. 00
Dat. Data
Limit Qual.
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
-------
TABLE 8-4 DATA LI8TIN6 FOR MEHCURV IU0/KO MET) IN
PUOET SOUND F1BH. SHELLFISH. AND MACROALOAE
CD
l
ro
ro
Projoct
EPA/UDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WOOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WOF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WOF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WOF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WOF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WOF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WOF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WOF
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
D8H8
DSHS
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHB
DBHS
DBHB
DSHS
DBHB
DSHS
DSHS
Aroa
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Anacorttt
Anacorttt
Commtnctmtnt Bay
Commtnctmtnt Bay
Commtnctmtnt Bay
Commtnctmtnt Bay
Commtnctmtnt Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Evoratt Harbor
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Commtnctmtnt Bay
Commonctmtnt Bay
Oath Point
Birch Bay
Budd Inltt
Dath Point
Dath Point
Dath Point
Budd Inltt
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Birch Bay
Birch Bay
Budd Inltt
Budd Inltt
Budd Inltt
Budd Inltt
Burlty Lagoon
Ouarttrmasttr Harbor
Bpoclot
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Coho salmon
Coho talmon
Htart cocklt
H. inquinata
H. inquinata
H. inquinata
Btntnott clam
Bontnott clam
Boftshtll clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Littltntck clam
Dtt. Data
Mtrcury Limit Oual.
l.OO U
1.00 U
3.00
1.00
1.00 U
1.00 U
43.0O
26O. OO
42. OO
94.00
39.00
92. OO
91. OO
4O. OO
2O.OO
63. OO
76. OO
32. OO
93. OO
64. OO
67. OO
44. OO
39.00
41. OO
22. OO
49. OO
29. 00
37. OO
24. OO
39. 00
99. OO
41. OO
2O. OO
22. OO
97. OO
103. OO
69. OO
61. OO
20. 00
26. OO
22. 00
2O.OO
2O. OO
20. 00
20. OO
20.00
20. 00
2O. OO
20. 00
20. 00
20. 00
20. 00
27. OO
-------
co
t
ro
CL)
I-UWKI Buunu riant ormi-i-riMii iwui rHMiHUM.«AB
Pro jact
D8HB
DBH8
D8H8
08HB
O8HB
D8H8
DBH8
DBHS
D8HS
D8H8
D8H8
DSH8
DSH8
D8HS
DBH8
D8H8
D8H8
D8H8
D6HB
OSH8
DSH8
DSH8
DSH8
DSHS
DSH8
D8H8
DBHS
DSHS
DBHS
DSHS
D8H8
DBHS
DSHS
DSH8
DSHB
DSHS
DBHS
DBHS
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
Area
Quartarmastir Harbor
Quartarmastar Harbor
Quartarmaster Harbor
Dash Point
Dash Point
Mukiltao
Mukiitto
Mukiltao
HukiUto
Sinclair Inlat
Sinclair InUt
Sinclair Inlat
Alki Point
Alkl Point
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Burlay Lagoon
Burltv Lagoon
Burlay Lagoon
Quartarmastar Harbor
Quartarmastar Harbor
Dash Point
Mukiltao
Mukiltao
Mukiltao
Mukiltao
Sinclair Inlat
Sinclair Inlat
Sinclair Inlat
Budd Inlat
Budd Inlat
Quartarmaatar Harbor
Quartarmastar Harbor
Alki Point
Quartarmastar Harbor
Sinclair Inlat
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
EJHiott Bay
EUiott Bay
Spacias
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clan
Littlanack clan
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Llttlanick clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clan
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Manila clam
Manila clam
Manila clam
Manila clam
Hortanack clam
Horianack clam
Horsanack clam
English tola
English tola
English tola
English sola
Engliih tola
English tola
English cola
English sol*
English sola
English tola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sol*
English sole
Dat.
Marcury Limit
20.OO
20.00
23. 00
20.OO
20.0O
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
30.00
32. 00
34. 00
20.OO
20.00
20.00
20.00
20. OO
20. 00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20.00
20. 00
20.00
20.00
20.00
41.00
28. OO
23.00
20.00
20.00
23.00
20.00
20.00
26. 00
27.00
123.00
13.00
99.00
94.00
74.00
71.00
93.00
99. 00
67. OO
66.00
21.00
18.00
39.00
48. OO
35. OO
Data
Qual.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
-------
TABLE B-4. DATA LISTING FOR MERCURY (UO/KO WET) IN
PUOET SOUND FISH, SHELLFISH. AND HACROALflAE
oo
I
ro
Project
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
Art*
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point Pulley
Point Pulley
Point Pullty
Point Pulley
Point Pulley
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Spec let
Englith tale
English tola
Englith *ol«
English tola
Englith cola
Englith tole
Englith tola
Englith tola
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tola
Englith tola
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tola
Englith tole
Englith tola
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tola
Englith tola
Englith tale
Englith tola
Englith tola
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tola
Englith tola
Englith tola
Englith tola
Englith tola
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tola
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tole
Englith tole
English sole
Englith tole
English sole
English sole
Englith tole
English sole
English sole
English sole
Oat.
Mercury Linit
70.00
60 OO
66.0O
97.OO
48.00
75.00
100. OO
114.00
7O. OO
61. OO
102.00
43.00
78. OO
93. OO
23.00
101.00
49.OO
93.OO
69.00
11B. OO
98. OO
99.00
89. OO
68.00
61. OO
34.OO
28. OO
11.00
71. OO
39.OO
23. OO
78. OO
33.00
99.OO
69. OO
67.00
134. OO
46. OO
149.00
29. OO
96.00
99.00
86. OO
91. OO
118. 00
9 OO
3.00
16.00
11 00
9 00
34 00
66. 00
46 00
Data
dual.
j
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
j
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
j
J
J
J
J
j
j
J
j
J
J
J
J
j
J
J
j
J
J
j
J
J
J
J
j
J
J
J
j
J
j
J
J
J
J
J
j
-------
TABLE B-4. DATA LI8TIN0 FOR WRCUftV (UO/KO MET) IN
PUGET SOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND HACftOALOAE
CD
I
ro
in
Project
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
Area
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evarett Harbor
Evarett Harbor
Evarett Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Port Susan
Port Susan
Port Suian
Port Susan
Port Susan
Evaratt Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Species
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English tola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English tola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sole
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sole
English sola
English sola
English sole
English sole
English sole
English sole
English sola
English sole
English sole
English sola
English sole
English sole
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Dungene** crab
Dungentfts crab
Mercury
38. OO
19.00
61. OO
78. OO
69. OO
44. OO
42.00
70.00
34. OO
49.00
61. 00
46. OO
13. OO
23. OO
63.00
33.00
60. OO
58.00
41. OO
42. OO
37.OO
4O. OO
47. OO
31.00
90. OO
40.00
26. OO
36. OO
19. OO
34.00
36. OO
71. OO
91.00
76.00
39.00
39.OO
32. OO
28. 00
39.00
36. OO
114. OO
92 00
68.00
53.0O
10O. OO
62. 00
88 00
49. OO
139. OO
139. OO
89. OO
64. 00
82. 00
Dat. Data
Limit dual
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
-------
TABLE B-4. DATA LI8TINO FOR MERCURY (UO/KO MET) IN
PUOET BOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND MACROALOAE
CD
ro
0»
Projtct
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
NOAA8
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAAS
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAA2
NOAAS
NOAA2
NOAAS
NOAA2
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAAS
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
An*
Evirttt Harbor
Evarttt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Port Susan
CoMancaatant Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point Jafftrton
Point Jaffermon
Point Jafferaon
Point Jaffanon
CoMancaawnt Bay
CoMancaaant Bay
CoMancaaant Bay
CoMancamant Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Ed«onds
Edmonds
Edaiondi
Edaionds
Edaionds
Agata Pat*
A|ata Pass
Agata Pass
Agata Pait
Point Mad it on
Point Haditon
Point Madison
Manchastar
Manchasttr
Manchastar
Manchaitar
Point JaMarcon
Co««ancamant Bay
Point Mad i ton
Point Madison
Point Madiion
Point Madiion
Point Madiion
Point Madison
Point Madison
Point Madison
Conmancamant Bag
Comment: cmtnt Bay
Bpacias
Dunganass crab
Dunganats crab
Dunganass crab
Dunganass crab
Dunganass crab
Dunganass crab
Dunganass crab
Dunganass crab
Dunganass crab
Dunganass crab
Dunganass crab
Pacific haka
Pacific baka
Pacific baka
Pacific haka
Pacific haka
Pacific haka
Pacific haka
Rockfiab
Rockfich
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfiab
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Bablafish
Sablafish
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Mallaya pollock
Wallaya pollock
Uallaya pollock
Mallaya pollock
Uallaya pollock
Mallaya pollock
Tomcod
Tomcod
Tomcod
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Oat.
Marcury Liaiit
97.OO
ias. oo
74.00
89. OO
38. OO
67. OO
33.OO
41. OO
41. OO
93.OO
7O. OO
4. OO
3. OO
3. OO
9.00
3. OO
9. OO
9.00
3. OO U
9. OO
S. OO U
79. OO
3. OO U
19. 00
3. 00
8. OO
SB. OO
7.00
99. 00
9. 00
3. 00 U
17. OO
16.00
19. 00
3. OO
22. OO
13. OO
7.00
9O. 00
3. OO
13.00
26. 00
6. 00
73.00
8. OO
3. OO
6. 00
i. oo u
9. 00
3. 00
8.00
2. 00 U
1S6. 00
Data
Qual.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
-------
TAMUt"•-«. D*TA L.I»TIN0 rOfl MENCUNY CU0/KO MCT» IN
PUOCT BOUND FIBH, BHEU-FIBH. AND HACHOALOAE
CD
I
ro
Project
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
WDOE1
UDOE1
UDOE1
UDOE1
WDOEt
UOOE1
UDOE1
UDOE1
UDOE1
Arta
CoMttnctmtnt Bay
CoMtnct*tnt Bay
Sinclair Inlit
Sinclair Inltt
Sinclair Inlit
Sinclair Inltt
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Edaondt
Edaondt
Edaondt
Edaondt
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Sinclair Inltt
Edmondt
Edaondt
Eaglt Harbor
Eaglt Harbor
Eaglt Harbor
Eaglt Harbor
Eagle Harbor
Eaglt Harbor
Eaglt Harbor
Eaglt Harbor
Point Blaktly
Sptcltt
Starry floundtr
Starry flounder
Starry floundtr
Starry floundtr
Starry floundtr
Starry floundtr
Rock tolt
Rock tolt
Rock »olt
Rock tolt
Rock »olt
Rock tolt
Rock colt
Rock tolt
Narktt io.uid
Harktt tquid
Marktt mq.uid
Marktt tquid
Marktt «quld
Marktt tquid
Blvalvt tpp.
Bivalvt tpp.
Bivalvt tpp.
Bivalvt tpp.
Bivalvt tpp.
Bivalvt tpp.
Bivalvt tpp.
Bivalvt tpp.
Bivalvt tpp.
Dtt. Data
Mtrcury Li«lt dual.
2.00 U
2.00 U
11. OO
14.00
17. OO
2. OO U
3.00
4. OO
9.00
2. OO U
2.00
2.00
a. oo
2. OO U
16. OO
8. OO
a. oo
22.00
A. OO
3. OO
18.00
31. OO
68.00
94. OO
22. OO
34.OO
27.00
10. OO
12.OO
-------
TABLE 1-9. DATA LISTING POM CARCINOGENIC PAH (UO/KO WET>
IN PU0ET SOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND MACflOALOAE
CD
ro
00
Projtct Area
EPA/DBH8 Dash Point
EPA/D8H8 Dash Point
EPA/DBH8 Evaratt Harbor
EPA/DBH8 Alki Point
EPA/D8H8 Birch Bay
EPA/OBHB Ouartarmastor Harkor
EPA/OSHS Dash Point
EPA/DBH8 Evorott Harbor
EPA/DBMS Mukiltto
EPA/DBH8 Sinclair Iniot
EPA/OBH8 Alki Point
EPA/DBHS Birch Bay
EPA/DBHB Burlay Lagoon
EPA/OBHB Ouartarmastar Harbor
EPA/DBHS Evaratt Harbor
EPA/DBHS Hukiltto
EPA/DBHS Hukiltao
EPA/DBHS Sinclair Inlat
EPA/D8HS Ouartarmattar Harbor
EPA/UDOE Budd Inltt
EPA/MDOE Commancamant Bay
EPA/UDOE Elliott Bay
EPA/MDOE Evaratt Harbor
EPA/MDOE Point No Point
EPA/MDF Coawancamant Bay
EPA/MDF Elliott Bay
EPA/MDF Elliott Bay
EPA/MDF Evaratt Harbor
MDOE1 Railing Bay
MDOE1 Eaglo Harbor
WDOEI Eafla Harbor
MDOEt Eaglo Harbor
MDOE1 Eaglo Harbor
MDOE1 Eaglo Harbor
WDOEI Eagla Harbor
WDOEI Eagla Harbor
WDOEI Eagla Harbor
MDOE1 Eagla Harbor
WDOEI Eagla Harbor
WDOEI Eagla Harbor
WDOEI Eagla Harbor
WDOEI Point Blakoly
WDOE2 Budd Inltt
WDOE2 Budd Inltt
WDOE2 Budd Inltt
WDOE2 Budd Inltt
Bpacias
Bantnota clam
Bantnosa clam
Band clam
Littlanack elan
Littlanack clan
Littlonack da*
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clan
Littlanack clam
Buttor clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar clam
Buttar claai
Buttar clan
Buttar claai
Buttar claai
Manila claai
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Rock crab
Rock crab
Rock crab
Rock crab
Rock crab
Bivalva spa.
Bivalva spp.
Bivalva spp.
Bivalva spp.
Bivalva spp.
Bivalva spp.
Bivalva spp.
Bivalva spp.
Bivalva spp.
Boftshall clam
Littlanack clam
Littlanack clam
Bivalva spp.
B(A>A I
9.00
20.00
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
2.00
2.00
2. OO
2.00
2. OO
2.00
2. OO
2. OO
2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
5.00
60.00
240.00
ISO. OO
120.OO
110.00
70. OO
74.00
370. OO
190. OO
2.00
12. OO
10. OO
14. OO
9. 4O
210.OO
2. OO
22.OO
39.00
28.00
46.00
32. OO
2. OO
10. OO
77. 00
10. 00
10.00
50.00
Dtt.
.imit
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Data
dual. B(b
2.
6.
O.
2.
'.
.
10.
60
240.
150.
120.
110.
0 70.
J 74.
J 370.
J 190.
H 4.
S3.
4.
26.
2.
120.
2.
24.
54.
33.
48.
26.
2.
14.
91.
10.
10.
10.
>F L
00
OO
80
OO
OO
00
OO
OO
00
OO
OO
00
OO
OO
OO
00
OO
00
00
OO
OO
00
OO
00
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
OO
00
60
00
OO
00
OO
OO
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dot.
imit
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Data
dual. Chrysana 1
2. OO
2O.OO
2. OO
2.00
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
a. oo
2.00
2. OO
J 3. OO
S. 00
J 2.00
J 2. OO
2.00
8.00
60. OO
24O. OO
ISO. OO
12O.OO
11O. OO
J 70. OO
J 74.OO
J 37O. OO
J 190.00
H 4. OO
14. OO
6. 60
14. OO
9.40
36O. OO
2. OO
28. OO
120.OO
44. OO
46. OO
39. OO
2. OO
15.00
110. OO
10.00
10.00
50.00
Dtt.
Limit
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Data
Qua I Bia)P L
2. 00
4.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2 OO
2.00
2.00
2. OO
2. 00
2. 00
2 00
2 00
2. OO
J 2.00
2. 00
2. 00
2.00
2. OO
60. 00
240. 00
150. 00
120. 00
7. OO
J 70. 00
J 74. 00
J 370. 00
J 190. 00
H 6. 00
18. OO
IB. 00
6. 40
6. 00
58. 00
6. 00
6, 00
14. 00
6. OO
IS. 00
6. 00
6. 00
3. 20
1O. 00
10.00
10.00
1O. OO
Dtt.
imit
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Data
Qual.
J
J
J
J
rl
M
-------
CD
I
ro
ruwtr BOUND rian. OMEI.I.I- isn. AMD rMCRDM-«ME
Project
EPA/D8H8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/DSHS
EPA/D8H8
EPA/08H8
EPA/DSHS
EPA/OBH8
EPA/DBH8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/DSHS
EPA/OSH8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/DSHS
EPA/DSHS
EPA/DSHS
EPA/DSHS
EPA/DSHS
EPA/DSHS
EPA/MDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/MDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/WDQE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDQE
EPA/WDQE
EPA/WDQE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
Area
Da«h Point
Deck Point
Everett Harbor
Alki Point
•trek Bay
Quartermaster Harbor
Dath Point
Everett Harbor
Hukllteo
Sinclair Inlet
Alki Point
Bircli Bay
Bur lav, Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Everett Harbor
Hukilteo
Mufcilteo
Sinclair Inlet
Quartermaster Harbor
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Commencement Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Budd Inlet
Budd InUt
Budd InUt
Budd InUt
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Evorott Harbor
Everett Harbor
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Elliott Bay
Special
Bentnoeo clam
Bantnoto clam
Sand clam
Littlanact clam
Littleneck clam
Littlenock clam
Llttlanack clam
Littloneck clam
Littleneck clam
Littlanock clam
Butter clem
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clem
Butter clam
Butter clam
Butter clam
Manila clam
Laminaria
Laminar ia
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Noreocystle
Nereocyitii
Naroocyeti*
Nereocystlt
Neroocyetie
Nareocy«ti«
Nereocyetic
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Uiva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulv«i
MOT i
PCB1294
2. 70
6.00
8.60
2.00
1. 00
2.70
l.OO
4.00
3.40
8 60
3.90
1.00
3.80
4. 10
3. SO
1.70
2.90
10.00
4.00
10.00
10.00
1O. OO
1O. OO
10.00
1O. OO
10.00
10.00
1O. 00
10.00
10.00
to. oo
1O. 00
10.00
10. oo
1O. 00
10. 00
10. OO
10.00
10. 00
3O. 00
10 00
10. 00
10. 00
10.00
10. 00
10. 00
10 OO
10.00
10. oo
10.00
10.00
10. QO
10. 00
Det. Data
Limit dual.
u
u
u
u
u
u
. u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
PCB126O
l.OO
7. OO
3. 10
1.00
1.00
2. 10
3. 4O
3. 2O
3.00
11. OO
2.20
1.00
3. 4O
2.40
2.70
2. OO
2.80
13.00
2.90
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
to. oo
10. oo
10.00
10.00
10.00
10.00
10. OO
10. oo
10.00
to. oo
10. 00
10.00
10. OO
10.00
10.00
3O. OO
10.00
10. 00
10. 00
10.00
10. 00
10. oo
10.00
10.00
10. 00
10. 00
10.00
to. oo
10. 00
Det. Data Det. Data
Limit Oual. Total PCBt Limit dual.
U ...
U ...
U . .
U ...
i • >
U . .
u ...
u ...
u . . .
u . .
u ...
u . . .
u ...
u ...
u ...
u ...
u ...
u ...
u ...
u ...
u . . .
u . .
u . .
u . .
u . .
u ...
u .
u ...
u . .
u ...
u . .
u . .
u . .
u .
u .
u
u .
u ...
u . .
-------
TABLE 8-6. DATA LI8T1NO FOR PCBs (UO/HQ MET) IN
PU0ET BOUND FISH. SHELLFISH, AND HACROALOAE
CO
1
CO
o
Projsct
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DBH8
DSHS
DBH8
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
Aroo
Elliott Boy
Elliott Boy
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Anocortos
Anocortos
Commancamant Boy
Commoncamant Bay
Comaioncamant Boy
Commoncomant Bay
Commoncamant Boy
Elliott Boy
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Boy
Elliott Boy
Elliott Boy
Elliott Boy
Elliott Boy
Elliott Boy
Evorott Harbor
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Commoncamant Bay
Commoncsmant Boy
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Bu44 Inlot
Bur lay Lagoon
Ouortarmastar Harbor
Dash Point
Mufciltao
Sinclair Inlot
Elliott Bay
Elliott Boy
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Bpocios
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
solmon
solaion
solmon
solmon
solmon
salmon
solmon
solmon
solmon
solmon
solaion
solmon
solmon
solmon
solmon
solmon
solmon
solmon
solmon
solmon
solmon
solmon
solmon
solmon
Coho salmon
Coho salmon
Bivolvo
Bivolvo
Bivalve
Bivolvo
Bivolvo
Bivolvo
Bivalva
Bivolvo
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
spp.
•ap
spp.
spp.
spp.
spp.
spp.
spp.
solo
solo
solo
solo
solo
sola
sola
solo
sola
sola
sola
tola
sola
Oft.
PCB1894 Limit
10. 00 U
10. 00 U
10. OO U
10. OO U
10. 00 U
10. 00 U
84.00
16. OO
97.00
810. 00
140.00
160. OO
61. OO
96. OO
39.0O
170.00
tao. oo
89. OO
94.00
39.00
41.00
49.00
99.00
47.0O
16.00
48. OO
140.00
38.00
16.00
16.00
69.00
93.0O
a. 10
a. 70
11 30
11.90
1. 1O
18.20
9.90
17. 00
.
Do to
Ouol.
JO
je
JO
JO
JO
JO
JO
JO
,
,
PCB186O
10. OO
1O. OO
10.00
10. OO
10.00
10.00
10. OO
1O. 00
10. OO
10. OO
10.00
10. oo
10. OO
10.00
1O. 00
10.00
10. oo
10. OO
10.00
1O. 00
10.00
1O. 00
10.00
10.00
10. OO
10.00
10.00
10. OO
10. OO
10.00
10. oo
10. oo
Dot. Dot«
Limit gpoi.
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Tptal PCBs Hull
1.
4.
2.
1.
10.
280.
430.
280.
490
630.
250.
230
2. 060.
, .
,
. .
f ,
t ,
.
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
«M»I
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
-------
TABLE B-*. DATA LIBTINO FOR PCBm (UO/KO UET> IN
PUOET BOUND FISH. SHELLFISH- AND HACROALOAE
Project
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
I UBAP/EB
**> UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
Area
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point Polity
Point Pulley
Point Pulliy
Point Pulley
Point Pulley
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Det. Data Oat. Data
Specie* PCB1294 Limit dual. PCB126O Limit dual.
English tola . . . . . .
English sole . . . .
English tele ......
English vole . . . .
English »ole . . . .
English sole . . . .
English sole . . . . .
English solo . . . .
English sole . . . . .
English sole . . . .
English solo . . . .
English solo ......
English vole ......
English solo . . . .
English solo . . . . .
English sole . . . .
English mole . . . . . •
English sole . . . . .
English solo . . • .
English sole . . . .
English sole . . • .
English sole . . . • •
English solo . . • • •
English sole . . • •
English sole . . . •
English solo . . • •
English sole . . . •
English sole . . . • •
English sole . . • •
English sole . . • •
English sole . . • • •
English sole . . . .
English sole . . . • •
English sole . • • • •
English sole . . • • •
English sole . . . •
English sole • • • . .
English sole . . . .
English sole . . . .
English sole . • • • •
English sole . . . • •
English sole . . . .
English sole
English sole . . . . .
English sole . . . . .
English sole . . . .
English sole . . . .
English sole . . .
English sole . . . .
English sole . . . .
Englith so! ci
Eng 1 i*h *os* . . . . . .
English sole . . . •
Det.
Total PCBs Limit
650 00
310. 00
996. 00
190. OO
730. 00
410. 00
330. 00
13.00
30 00
1 . 490. 00
37.00
49.00
640. 00
200. 00
690. 00
190. 00
390. 00
4BO. 00
93.00
29. 00
47.00
12. OO
420. OO
280. 00
190. OO
79.00
160. 00
42. 00
330. 00
67O. 00
49O. 00
93.00
ZOO. 00
440. OO
930.00
430. 00
93.00
680.00
1.030.00
830. OO
100. 00
390. 00
8. OO
9.00
3. 00
19. 00
2. 00
42 00
25. OO
16. OO
13 00
18. OO
31 00
Data
dual.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
-------
TABLE B-*>. DATA L1BTINO fO* PCB.
-------
CD
I
co
CO
PUOET BOUND FISH. HMfeUUI- *BM> MNU rMMiKOM-BAK
Project
EPA/DBH8
EPA/DSH8
EPA/D6H8
EPA/D8HB
EPA/D8HS
EPA/D8H8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/D8HS
EPA/DBH8
EPA/DBH8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/DBH8
EPA/DBH8
EPA/DBH8
EPA/DSH8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WOOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
Area
Dath Point
Dath Point
Everett Harbor
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Quartermaster Harbor
Dash Point
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Sinclair Inlat
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Burley Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Mukilteo
Sinclair Inlet
Quartermaster Harbor
Commencement Ba\|
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Commencement Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Budd Inlat
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlat
Budd Inlat
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Point No Point
Point No Point
*"or.nt No Point
EHiott Bay
Speciet Alpha-HCH
Bentnote clam O. 1O
Bentnose clam 0. 20
Band clam 0. 10
Littleneck clam 0. 1O
Littleneck claw 0. 10
Littlaneck clam 0. 10
Littlaneck clan 0. 10
Littleneck clam 0. 1O
Littleneck clam 0. 10
Littleneck clam 0. 10
Butter clam O. 10
Butter clam 0. 10
Butter clam O. 1O
Butter clam 0. 10
Butter clam 0. 10
Butter clam 0. 10
Butter clam 0. 10
Butter clam 0. 10
Hani la clam 0. 1O
Laminaria
Laminar! a
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminar la
Laminaria
Laminaria
Laminaria
Nereocyttit
Nereocyt tit
Noreocystls
Nereocy»tit
Nertocyttit
Nereocyctit
Nereocystis
Ulva
Diva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
. oo
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
. oo
.00
. 00
. 00
.00
.00
. oo
. oo
. 00
.00
. 00
. 00
J 00
. 00
. oo
.00
. 00
. oo
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
Ulv* 1 00
Nor* 1 OO
Det. Data
Limit dual
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
-------
TABLE a-7. DATA LISTING FOR AUPHA-HCH on
Chinook salaon
Chinook sal«on
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook saloon
Chinook salmon
Chlnqok salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Chinook salmon
Coho salmon
Coho salmon
English «ol«
Enolich oolo
English tolo
English solo
English solo
English solo
English solo
English solo
English solo
English solo
English solo
English solo
English solo 1
English solo 1
English solo
English solo
English solo
English solo
English sol*
English sol*
English «ol«
. OO
. OO
. 00
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. 00
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
. OO
.00
.00
. OO
. OO
.00
. OO
. OO
.00
.00
. 00
.00
. OO
.00
.00
OO
.00
00
00
OO
OO
00
00
00
00
00
00
Dot Data
Lioit dual
u
u
u
g
{J
u
u
u
u
g
u
y
u
u
u
u
u
g
(J
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
-------
IN
oa
i
CO
en
r **•>• • SJVWVI^BIV • * MI it w^sBMwiwr » nn •< • •• ^sw rv***vnMnswwns&
Project
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
USAP/EH
UBAP/EH
Area
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point Pulley
Point Pulley
Point Polity
Point Pulley
Point Pulley
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Ev«r«tt Harbor
Everett Harbor
£v«r*tt Harbor
Everett Harbor
Specii
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
Engliih
English
Cngl ish
English
is Alpha-HCH
sole
sale
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
iol>
sole
sol*
sols
1.
1.
1.
1.
4.
1.
4.
1.
4.
10.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
10.
10.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
oo
00
00
00
00
oo
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
oo
00
00
oo
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
oo
00
oo
00
oo
00
00
oo
00
00
oo
00
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Oet. Data
Limit Oual.
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
-------
TABLE B-7. DATA LISTING FOR ALPHA-HCH
-------
TA0LE 9-7. DATA LISTING FOR AUPMA-HCH IN
PUQET SOUND FISH. BHEU-FIBH. AMP MACROALOAE
Oat. Data
Prpjtct Art* 8p»cie» Alpha-HCH Li«it Ui>l.
UBAP/EH Ev«r«tt Harbor Dung»n»t» crab 0. 10 U
UBAP/EH Evtrttt Harbor Dungtnai* crab 0. 10 U
UBAP/EH Evaratt Harbor Dungtna»« crab 0. 10 U
UBAP/EH Evaratt Harbor Dunganaat crab 0. 10 U
UBAP/EH Port 8u»an Oungana»t crab 0. 10 U
00
i
co
-------
TABLE B-8. DATA LISTING KM ODD. DDE. AND DDT (UO/KO MET!
IN PUOET BOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND HACROALOAC
CD
I
CO
oo
Project
EPA/OBH8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/D8HB
EPA/D8H8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/DBHB
EPA/D8H8
EPA/DBMS
EPA/D8H8
EPA/D8HB
EPA/D8H8
EPA/D8H8
EPA/DSHB
EPA/D8H8
EPA/DBHB
EPA/D8H8
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/DBHB
EPA/HDOE
EPA/MDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/MDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UOOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/UDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/UDQE
EPA/UDQE
EPA/UDQE
EPA/MDOE
EPA/MDOE
Area
Dash Point
Oaeh Point
Everett Harbor
Alki Point
Birch Bay
duarteraacter Harbor
Daek Point
Everett Harbor
Hwkiltoo
Sinclair Inlet
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Bur log Lagoon
O.uartar«a«ter Harbor
Evorott Harbor
Hukiltoo
Hukiltoo
Sinclair Inlot
duarterMtter Harbor
Co**onco*ent Bay
Co**ance*ent Bay
Co**once*ent Bay
Co**onco*ont Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Co**onco*ent Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point No Point
Point No Point
Budd Inlat
Sudd Inlot
Budd Inlot
Budd Inlat
Co**ance*ent Bay
Co**once«ent Bay
CoaMancamant Bay
Co**ence*ent Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Elliott Bay
Bpeciee DDD
Bantnoto cla* O. 10
Bentnoto cla* 0.20
Band claai 0. 1O
Littlonock cla* 0. 10
Littlanock cla* 0. 10
Littlanock cla* 0. 10
Littlanock cla* 0. 10
Littlonock cla* 0. 10
Littlonock cla* 0. 10
Littlonock cla* O. 97
Butter cla* O. 10
Butter cla* O. 10
Butter cla* 0. 10
Butter cla* 0. 10
Butter cla* 0. 10
Butter cla* 0. 10
Butter cla* 0. 10
Butter cla* 0. 10
Manila cla* 0. 10
La* i nor i a
La*inaria
La*lnaria
La*inaria
La*inarla
La*inarla
La*inaria
La*inaria
La*inaria
Nareocyttia
Naroocyeti*
Neroocyetit
Nereocyttie
Nereocyetie
Nareocyeti*
Nereocyttie
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
Ulva
.OO
.00
.OO
.OO
.OO
.OO
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
00
. 00
.00
. 00
.00
.00
. 00
. 00
. 00
.00
00
. 00
. OO
00
00
00
00
. 00
00
00
00
Nori 1.00
Det. Data
Linit dual.
U
U
U H
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
' U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Dat.
DDE Li*it
O. la
0.43
0. 10 U
0. 1O U
0. 19
o. to u
O. 1O U
O. 4O
O. 10 U
0.94
0.97
O. 10 U
O. 22
O. 39
0. IS
O. 10 U
0. 10 U
O. 48
0.39
3.00
3.00
3. OO
3. OO
3. OO
3. OO
3. OO
3.00
3. OO
3.00
2. OO
3. OO
3. 00
3. OO
3. OO
2.00
3.00
3. OO
3.00
3. OO
4. OO
3.00
2.00
3. OO
3. OO
3.00
3 00
3. OO
3.00
4.00
3.00
3.00
3. 00
3 00
Data
Qual. DDT
0. 10
0.20
H 0. 10
0. 1O
O. 10
n o. 10
0. 10
o. 10
M 0. 10
0. 10
O. 30
O. 10
O. 10
0. la
0. 10
H 0. 10
O. 10
0. 89
0. 10
. 00
.00
. OO
. 00
. 00
. 00
.00
.00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. 00
. OO
. OO
. 00
. 00
. 00
.00
. 00
. 00
. 00
00
00
. 00
00
. 00
. 00
00
00
00
1 00
1 00
! 00
Oat. Data
Limit Qual
U
U
U
U
U
U M
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
-------
TABLE B-B DATA LXBTINO FOR ODD. DDE. AND DDT (UO/KO MET)
IN PUOET BOUND FISH. SHELLFISH. AND MACROALOAE
00
Project
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDOE
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
EPA/WDF
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
DSHS
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
U9AP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
Area
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Anacortes
Anacortes
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Alki Point
Birch Bag
Busd Inlet
Bur lag Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Dash Point
Mukilteo
Sinclair Inlet
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Species
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Nori
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
Chinook
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
salmon
Coho salmon
Coho salmon
Bivalva
Bivalve
Bivalve
Bivalve
Bivalve
Bivalve
Bivalve
Bivalva
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
English
Enflll»h
Eng I ish
English
spp.
spp.
spp.
spp.
spp.
spp.
SPP
spp
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
sole
cole
sole
sole
DDD
. 00
00
.00
.00
. OO
.00
.00
. 00
.00
9. 00
1.00
23.00
16 00
27.00
l.OO
31. 00
9.00
1.00
10. 00
1.00
9.00
4.00
8. 00
12.00
1. OO
9.00
10.00
A. OO
1.00
1. 00
3. OO
22.00
9.00
9. 00
9. 00
9.00
9. 00
9. 00
9. 00
9 00
9 00
9. 00
9. 00
5. OO
30. 00
Det. Data Det.
Limit Qual. DDE Limit
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
3.
3.
2.
3.
3.
3.
9.
4.
11.
91.
39.
7.
IB.
7.
34.
27.
B.
11.
7.
1.
6.
17.
36.
3.
20.
42.
39.
9.
7.
9.
29.
0.
O.
0.
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2
2.
2.
2.
2.
2.
2
20
OO
00
00
00
00
00
00
OO
00
OO
OO
OO
OO
00
00
OO
OO
00
00
00
00
00
OO
00
00
00
00
00
OO
OO
00
10
20
20
10
10
10
10
10
OO U
OO U
OO U
00 U
00 U
00 U
00 U
00 U
OO U
OO U
00 U
00 U
00 U
Data
Qual. DDT
5.
1.
11.
22.
18.
1.
3.
t>.
1
9
3.
1
2.
9.
10.
1
9
10
1
1
1.
4.
28.
JO 0.
JO O.
JG O.
JG 2.
JO 2.
JG 0.
JG 0.
JO O.
9.
9.
9.
9.
9.
9.
9.
S.
5
5
5
5
50
00
OO
00
OO
00
00
OO
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
OO
00
10
10
10
00
OO
10
10
10
00
00
OO
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
Det
Limit
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Data
Qual.
JG
JG
JG
JG
JG
JG
JG
JO
-
-------
TABUE B-B. DATA LI0TINO FM ODD. ODE. AND DDT (UO/K0 WET)
IN PUOET SOUND FISH, BHELLFI8H. AND MACROALOAE
oo
*»
O
Project
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EB
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
Area
Elliot* Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Batf
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Point Pulley
Point Pulley
Point Pulley
Point Pulley
Point Pulley
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Specie*
English tola
English eole
English sole
English sole
English sole
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English tola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sole
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sole
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sola
English sole
English sole
English sole
English sole
English sole
English sole
English sole
English sole
English sole
English sole
English cole
English sole
English sole
ODD
50.00
3. 00
9.00
9.00
9. 00
9. 00
9.00
9. 00
9.00
9. OO
9.00
9 OO
20.00
9. 00
20.00
9. OO
20.00
90.00
9.00
9.00
9.00
9. OO
9. OO
9.00
9. OO
9.00
9. OO
9. 00
9. OO
9.00
9. OO
9. OO
9. 00
9. OO
9. OO
9. 00
9. 00
9. OO
90. 00
90.00
9 00
9.00
9. 00
9. 00
9. 00
9. 00
9 00
0.60
0. 60
0. 60
0 60
0. 60
0. 60
Det. Data
Limit dual.
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
DDE
20.00
2. 00
2.00
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
2.00
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
2.00
2.00
B. 00
2.00
8.00
2.00
a. oo
20.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
2.00
2. OO
2.00
2. 00
2. OO
410.00
2. OO
2.00
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
2. OO
20. 00
2O. OO
2. 00
2.00
2. 00
2. OO
2. 00
2. 00
2. 00
0. 40
0. 40
0 40
0 40
0 40
0 40
Det. Data
Liait Oual.
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
DDT
90.00
9.00
9.00
9.00
9.00
9.00
9. 00
9.00
9. 00
9. OO
9. 00
9.00
2O.OO
9.00
20. 00
9.00
20 00
90. 00
9. OO
9.00
9. 00
9. OO
9. OO
9.00
9. OO
9. 00
9. 00
9. 00
9. 00
9. 00
9. OO
9. 00
9. 00
9. 00
9. OO
9. OO
9. OO
9. 00
90. 00
9O. 00
9 00
9. 00
9. OO
9. OO
9. 00
9. OO
9. 00
0. 7O
0 70
0 70
0 70
0 70
0 70
Det. Data
Limit Qual.
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
-------
TABLE B-B. DATA LISTING FOR ODD, DDE. AND DDT (UO/KO MET)
IN PUOET SOUND FISH, SHELLFISH. AND MACROALOAE
CD
I
Project
UDAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UBAP /EH
UDAP /EH
Arta
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Everett Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Everett Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Evtrttt Harbor
Port Susan
Port Susan
Port Susan
Port Susan
Port Susan
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Speciet
Englith tolt
English sole
Englith colt
English sole
Englith sole
English sole
Englith sole
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith sole
Englitb tolt
Englith sole
Englitb tolt
Englith tolt
Englitb tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith to It
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
Englith tole
Englith sole
Englith tolt
Englith tolt
English sole
Englith sole
Englith sole
English sole
English tolt
English sole
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
Starry flounder
ODD
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0 60
0. 6O
0.60
0. 60
0.60
0.60
0. 60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0. 6O
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0. 60
0.60
0. 60
0. 6O
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0.60
0. 60
0. 60
O. 6O
0.60
O. 6O
0.60
0. 60
0. 60
0. 60
0.60
O. 60
0 60
0.60
O. AO
0. 60
0 60
0. 6O
0 60
0. 60
0. 60
o. £0
Dtt.
Limit
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
Data
Qual. DDE
0 40
0. 40
0. 4O
0. 40
0. 40
0. 40
0.40
0. 40
0. 40
0. 40
0. 40
0.40
0. 40
0. 4O
0. 40
0.40
O. 4O
0.40
0.40
0. 40
0. 40
0. 40
0. 4O
0.40
0. 40
0. 4O
0.40
0. 40
0. 40
0. 40
0.40
0. 40
0. 4O
0. 4O
0. 40
0.40
0. 4O
0.40
0. 4O
0. 40
0. 40
0. 4O
0. 40
0. 40
0. 40
O. 4O
0. 4O
0. 40
0. 40
0. 40
0. 40
0. flO
0. 40
Dtt. Data
Limit dual
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
DDT
0 70
0 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
O. 70
0.70
0. 70
O. 70
0 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
O. 70
O. 70
0.70
O. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0 70
0. 70
0. 70
0 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0 70
0. 70
0 70
0. 70
0. 70
O. 70
0. 70
O. 7O
0 70
0 70
0 70
0 70
Dtt Data
Limit Gual
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
-------
TABLE B-8. DATA LISTING FOR ODD. ODE. AND DDT (UO/KO MET)
IN PUGET SOUND F1BH. SHELLFISH. AND MACROALOAE
en
Project
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
UBAP/EH
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NOAA2
NQAA2
NQAA2
NOAA2
Araa
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Cvaratt Harbor
Evaratt Harbor
Port Sutan
Commencement Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Edmondt
Point Jaffarton
Point Jafferton
Point Jafferton
Point Jeffarton
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Elliott Bag
Edmondt
Edmonds
Edmondt
Edmondt
Edmonds
Agate Patt
Agate Patt
Agate Patt
Manchester
Point Madison
Point Madison
Agate Paet
Manchester
Manchester
Manchester
Manchester
Point Jefferson
Commencement Bag
Commencement Bag
Point Madison
Point Madison
Point Madison
Point Madison
Point Madison
Commencement Bay
Species ODD
Dungenett crab 0. 60
Dungenet* crab 0. 60
Dunganett crab 0. 60
Dungenett crab 0. 60
Dungenett crab 0. 60
Dunganeat crab 0. 60
Dungenett crab 0. 60
Dunganett crab O. 6O
Dunganatt crab 0. 60
Dungenett crab 0. 60
Dunganatt crab 0. 60
Dunganet* crab 0. 60
Dunganett crab 0. 60
Pacific haka
Pacific haka
Pacific haka 3
Pacific haka 3
Pacific haka
Pacific haka
Pacific hake
Pacific haka
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfith
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfith
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockf isb
Rockfish
Rockfish
Rockfith
Rockfith
Bablafith
Bablefith
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Pacific cod
Mallege pollack
Uallege pollock
Walleye pollock
Uallege pollock
Mallege pollock
Mallege pollock
Mallege pollock
TomconS
83
99
40
64
78
81
87
00
OO
00
00
89
00
00
00
00
00
.OO
.OO
. OO
.OO
. 89
. 17
. 27
97
.87
.96
.00
. 94
.80
. 92
. 70
.00
. 00
91
. 00
83
88
00
. 00
Det. Data
Limit Qual. DDE
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
0. 40
0. 4O
0. 4O
0. 40
0. 4O
O. 4O
O. 4O
O. 4O
0. 40
O. 40
O. 4O
0. 4O
0. 40
9. 06
3. 69
3. 94
0. 90
2. 31
1. O2
1. O3
2. 76
2. 22
O. 90
2. 29
1. 21
0. 90
0. 90
2. 19
340
. 49
3. 87
2. 31
2. 9O
2. 35
0. 90
40 i
. 91
3. 32
3. 27
8. 04
9. 71
8. 96
10. 60
6. 03
4. 90
6. 12
8. 32
0. 90
2. 37
2. 41
0. 94
3. 32
1. 07
0. 93
0. SO
Det. Data
Limit Qual. DDT
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 70
0. 7O
0. 7O
0. 70
0. 7O
0. 7O
0, 70
0. 7O
7. 47
3. 49
1. 86
O. BO
0. 80
1. 91
O. BO
0. 80
0. BO
107
. 7/
OOI\
. SO
OQA
. DO
OOf\
. SO
Oo/\
. HO
Oon
. DO
OQ.A
. Ow
1r* t
. DO
OQA
. DO
Oof\
. SO
Oon
. SO
"*'
O. 80
OOA
. DO
3t A
. 1^
3. 46
3. 89
0. 80
1. 83
0. 80
O. 80
4. 42
0. 80
O. 80
0. 80
0. 80
0. 80
0. 80
0. SO
0. 80
Det. Data
Limit Qual.
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
-------
TABLE B-8. DATA LISTING FOR ODD. DDE. AND DOT
-------
APPENDIX C
SUMMARIES OF CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS AND ASSOCIATED HEALTH RISKS
FOR VARIOUS SEAFOOD CATEGORIES AND LOCATIONS IN PUGET SOUND
-------
TABLES
Page
C-l Summary of carcinogenic contaminant concentrations and
associated health risks for various seafood categories
and locations in Puget Sound C-l
C-2 Summary of noncarcinogenic contaminant concentrations and
associated health risks for various seafood categories and
locations in Puget Sound C-4
-------
TABLE C-l. SUMMARY OF CARCINOGENIC CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS AND ASSOCIATED
HEALTH RISKS FOR VARIOUS SEAFOOD CATEGORIES AND LOCATIONS IN PU6ET SOUND
•teal Area
«ric A1 ki Poi nt
Anacortes
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlet
Burley Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Comnencement Bay
Comnencement Bay
Comnencement Bay
Dash Point
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Edmonds
Edmonds
Agate Pass
Point Madison
Manchester
Point Jefferson
Eagle Harbor
Point Blakely
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
I Alki Point
Anacortes
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Burley Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Dash Point
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Point Pulley
Seafood
Category
Shellfish
Fish
Shel 1 f i sh
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shel 1 f i sh
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shel 1 f i sh
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Fish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Shellfish
Shellfish
Fish
Shel 1 f i sh
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Shellfish
Fish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Fish
Shel 1 fi sh
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kel p/Ul va
Shel 1 f i sh
Fish
Kel p/Ul va
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
No.
Samples
12
2
10
10
4
6
13
27
2
9
12
40
3
9
4
1
3
3
12
7
8
3
19
12
27
6
4
11
4
5
3
1
147
110
33
7
2
2
2
4
1
3
19
9
3
73
3
9
4
55
3
3
3
7
8
3
5
4
5
Percent
Detected
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
50
100
50
100
100
67
84
100
67
23
100
100
100
2
67
100
-
100
100
100
100
100
-
Sunmary Data (ug/kg wet wt)
Mean
2.658
515
2.287
2,540
485
2.780
3,454
6.367
6.650
3.467
2.733
2.142
9.667
2,563
3,223
930
2,067
507
1,820
474
3,340
1,020
6,602
3.074
2,137
8,133
2.125
1.882
4,875
2,220
2,938
3.700
3,441
3.252
2.559
2,279
0.54
7.50
0.22
4.00
0.32
0.39
17.87
4.22
0.42
18.52
5.61
3.89
3.75
1.38
0.30
4.33
0.15
28.36
3.88
4.00
10.39
2.79
6.00
SE
249
125
213
257
54
164
285
1.413
250
907
311
230
4,348
460
241
_
338
87
104
94
799
491
1.150
340
207
2,886
379
361
1,802
518
322
-
354
254
380
499
0.39
2.50
0.07
0.00
-
0.12
5.92
0.36
0.22
5.85
2.89
0.11
0.25
0.53
0.10
0.33
0.00
8.28
0.13
0.00
2.77
0.90
0.00
Minimum
1,530
390
1.200
1.330
340
2,400
1,550
500
6,400
940
1,400
340
1,300
730
2,730
930
1,400
410
1,260
190
820
470
1,200
1,300
400
3,600
1.100
500
700
1,000
1,500
3,700
190
1.200
340
470
0.15
5.00
0.15
4.00
0.32
0.15
1.00
3.00
0.15
1.15
2.00
3.00
3.00
0.85
0.15
4.00
0.15
4.00
3.00
4.00
3.71
1.16
6.00
Maximum
4.500
640
3.330
4.060
590
3,490
5.220
20.700
6,900
9,200
4.980
6.500
15,900
4,250
3,880
930
2,500
680
2.400
880
7.500
2,000
19,600
4,900
4.050
22,100
2,900
4,400
9,400
3,500
4,400
3,700
20,700
22,100
9,200
3,880
0.92
10.00
0.29
4.00
0.32
0.56
79.00
7.00
0.85
415.00
11.33
4.00
4.00
30.00
0.50
5.00
0.15
53.00
4.00
4.00
18.15
5.11
6.00
Carcinogenic Risk
Average High
Case Case
6xlo-7
IxlO'f
5x10';
6x10';
2x10";
7x10";
sxio";
2x10"=
2x10"°
2x10'?
6x10";
6x10"°
2x10"°
1x10"°
4x10'?.
2x10'°
_ j
2xlO"9
4xio";
1x10"°
2x10
IxlO'f
2x10"=
7x10";
6x10"°
2x10"°
6x10"°
5x10"°
1x10"=
6x10'°
7x10";
9x10";
9x10"°
8xio";
1x10"°
3xlO"9
3xlO"9
4xlO"£
1x10 ID
4x10 1°
2x10-9
2x10"=
1x10 in
5x10^°
2x10"^
1x10"
3xi°:io
4x10 J°
lxlO"l°
8x10"°
2x10 in
5xlO"l°
8x10"*°
2x10"
4x10",
1x10"!°
6x10";
IxlO'f
4x10"'
IxlO'f
4x10"=
1x10"=
1x10"=
2x10"°
1x10"=
2x10"=
5x10";?
2x10 ~\
2x10
5x10"^
1x10"*
1x10*5
4xlO"6
2x10"!
3x10"°
9x10"°
1x10"=
2x10"=
3x10"°
2X10"4.
2x10"=
5x10"=
7x10"=
7x10"=
5x10'=
2x10'*
7x10"=
2x10"=
C
8x10"=
2x10'=
1x10"=
3xlO"b
6xltrc
2x10"=
1x10"^
3xlO"7
-
1x10"'
1x10"=
4xio";
1x10 5
1x10"=
2x10^°
3x10 a
9x10'?
1x10-°
8x10""
5x10"'
2x10"?
2x10"=
3xl°"fi
8x10"°
8x10"°
6x10";
3x10'°
C-l
-------
TABLE C-l. (Continued)
Chemical
HCH
PAH
PCB
Area
Port Susan
Edmonds
Edmonds
Agate Pass
Point Madison
Manchester
Point Jefferson
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
Alki Point
Anacortes
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Burley Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Conmencement Bay
Comnencement Bay
Dash Point
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
Point Pulley
Port Susan
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
Alki Point
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlet
Burley Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Comnencement Bay
Dash Point
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
Eagle Harbor
Point Blakely
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
Alki Point
Anacortes
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Seafood
Category
Fish
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Shellfish
Fish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Fish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Fish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Shellfish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Shellfish
Shellfish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Shellfish
Shellfish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
No.
Samples
5
10
2
4
10
5
5
205
26
33
7
2
2
2
4
1
3
7
9
3
64
9
4
53
3
3
3
7
3
3
2
5
5
143
19
33
7
2
2
4
1
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
1
2
B
1
32
5
2
2
2
4
Percent
Detected
.
100
100
75
100
100
100
40
69
100
100
.
.
-
-
-
-
14
-
2
-
-
-
.
-
_
29
-
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
-
.
-
25
-
67
-
67
-
67
-
-
-
50
75
100
47
-
100
100
.
-
Sumnary Data (ug/kg Met wt)
Mean
0.85
3.64
4.07
8.06
6.52
10.08
6.73
11.15
1.60
4.03
3.86
0.05
0.50
0.05
0.50
0.05
0.05
0.71
0.61
0.07
1.01
0.50
0.50
0.06
0.05
0.50
0.05
1.36
0.50
0.50
0.05
0.50
0.05
0.60
0.05
0.53
0.50
3.8
3.5
95.8
120.0
3.5
7.7
480.0
20.2
300.0
4.1
240.0
3.2
168.5
4.3
177.9
42.2
61.9
261.7
4.3
25.0
1.0
10.0
SE
0.00
0.35
0.42
3.20
1.55
1.05
2.69
2.24
0.49
0.11
0.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
0.00
0.21
0.11
0.02
0.17
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.64
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.09
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.3
0.0
63.1
-
3.4
-
14.0
-
1.0
-
0.2
0.8
85.3
-
25.2
62.6
1.8
4.0
0.0
0.0
Minimum
0.85
1.97
3.65
1.15
1.83
6.94
3.30
0.85
0.15
3.00
3.00
0.05
0.50
0.05
0.50
0.05
0.05
0.50
0.50
0.05
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.05
0.05
0.50
0.05
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.05
0.50
0.05
0.05
0.05
0.50
0.50
3.5
3.5
20.0
120.0
3.5
3.5
480.0
3.5
300.0
2.5
240.0
3.0
168.5
3.5
6.0
42.2
2.5
120.0
2.5
21.0
1.0
10.0
Maximum
0.85
6.23
4.48
16.41
15.04
13.10
17.44
415.00
11.33
7.00
4.00
0.05
0.50
0.05
0.50
0.05
0.05
2.00
1.50
0.10
6.00
0.50
0.50
0.50
0.05
0.50
0.05
5.00
0.50
0.50
0.05
0.50
0.05
6.00
0.10
1.50
0.50
4.0
3.5
283.0
120.0
3.5
14.5
480.0
48.0
300.0
6.0
240.0
3.5
168.5
5.0
748.0
42.2
748.0
480.0
6.1
29.0
1.0
10.0
Carcinogenic Risk
Average High
Case Case
5xlO"8
2x10"'
2x10"°
5x10";
4x10":
6x10";
4x10";
7x10%
9xl°-10
5xl°lS
1x10 10
9xlO"9
lxlO'5
9xlO"9
2x10^
9x10 9
9xlO"9
lxlO'5
2xlO"9
lxlO'8
2x10-5
2x10-*
5x10-1°
1x10%
9xlO"9
2x10-9
9xl0'9
3xlO"5
2xlO"9
5x10%°
9xlO"9
lxlO'5
1x10"'
Q
9x10-9
2x10 in
SxlO'10
7X10'7.
6x10%
2x10
5xlO'7
6x10%
1x10
2xlO"5
4xlO"5
lxlO'5
7x10%
9x10%
6x10%
6x10%
8x10%
3x10%
8x10
IxlO-jj
1x10"°
5xlO'7
3xlO"5
1x10%
3xlO"8
4X10'7
2xlO"5
lxlO-j>
8x10"°
5xlO"5
6x10%
7x10
7xlO~5
3x10%
3xltr«
8xlO"8
2xlO'7
BxlO'5
2x10%
1x10"°
7
2x10%
2x10 B
2xlO"5
5x10%
2x10%
1x10
3x10%
1x10"°
2x10%
1x10%
2x10%
_t
4x1.0
lxlO"5
3x10%
2x10%
8x10-°
8x10%
ixio ;
2x10%
2x10-5
3xlO"7
2xlO';>
1x10%
IxlO'3
-
- ,
8xlO-b
-
3xlO"4
- .
3xlO-S
- .
IxlO'5
-
5xlO~b
1x10
A
4x10 ,
lxlO'J
6xlO'5
SxlO'f
2x10^
2x10
C-2
-------
HC-1. (Continued)
rial Area
Burley Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Comnencement Bay
Comnencement Bay
Comnencement Bay
Dash Point
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Port Susan
Edmonds
Edmonds
Agate Pass
Point Madison
Manchester
Point Jefferson
Eagle Harbor
Point Blakely
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
Seafood
Category
Shellfish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/ Diva
Shellfish
Fish
She! 1 f i sh
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Diva
She! 1 f i sh
Fish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Fish
Shel 1 f i sh
Fish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Shel 1 f i sh
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
No.
Samples
1
3
23
1
9
3
59
3
9
4
40
3
3
3
7
8
3
12
4
1
17
7
4
11
4
5
8
1
185
41
33
7
Percent
Detected
100
100
100
100
-
100
100
100
-
-
98
100
-
100
100
-
-
100
100
-
100
100
100
100
100
100
50
-
99
83
-
~
Sunmary Data (ug/kg wet vrt)
Mean
7.2
6.1
108.0
177.0
12.2
6.7
250.0
121.0
10.0
10.0
27.9
8.4
10.0
5.3
50.9
10.0
10.0
168.8
54.4
1.8
92.6
124.9
90.3
88.7
320.3
119.2
12.6
5.0
138.2
44.7
10.6
10.0
SE
.
0.6
12.7
-
2.2
3.2
48.6
54.6
0.0
0.0
3.4
1.7
0.0
0.8
16.6
0.0
0.0
44.1
19.3
-
29.7
28.1
13.3
22.3
128.5
41.7
3.2
-
17.6
10.2
0.6*
0.0
Minimum
7.2
4.8
19.0
177.0
10.0
3.2
20.0
61.0
10.0
10.0
1.8
6.2
10.0
3.7
21.0
10.0
10.0
30.0
19.6
1.8
21.0
24.0
68.0
24.0
112.0
62.0
5.0
5.0
1.8
1.0
* 10.0
10.0
Maximum
7.2
6.9
263.0
177.0
30.0
13.0
2,060.0
230.0
10.0
10.0
104.0
11.7
10.0
6.4
145.0
10.0
10.0
518.0
93.0
1.8
548.0
215.0
129.0
245.0
684.0
283.0
28.0
5.0
2.060.0
230.0
30.0
10.0
Carcinogenic Risk
Average High
Case Case
9x10"^
7x10-;
1x10-*
2x10-=
3x10'°
8x10''
3x10'*
1x10'=
3x10-8
7x10 =
4X10 K
IxlO-f
3x10"°
6x10"'
7x10-5
3x10'°
7x10 I
2x10'*
7x10"°
2x10-°
ixio :
2x10-5
1x10 *
IxlO-J
4x10*
2x10 c
2x10'°
BxKTj
2x10 *
5x10'°
3x10-°
7xlO's
c
2x10'=
lx!0"J
_C
3x10 I
SxlO'5
4xlO"f
8x10"*
2x10-5
5x10"°
4x10'*
4x10 £
2x10"^
2x10"=
lxlO'3
2x10-5
5x10"°
3x10-3
3x10 *
_rj
2x10 f
5x10'*
IxlQ-'f
1x10"^
SxlO'3
2xlO"|
5xlO"b
-•3
2x10 J
2x10"*
2x10 ~l
5xlO"b
C-3
-------
TABLE C-2. SUMMARY OF NONCARCIN06ENIC CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS AND ASSOCIATED
HEALTH RISKS FOR VARIOUS SEAFOOD CATE60RIES AND LOCATIONS IN PU6ET SOUND
Chemical Area
Cadmium Alki Point
Anacortes
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlet
Burley Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Comnencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Dash Point
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Edmonds
Edmonds
Agate Pass
Point Madison
Manchester
Point Jefferson
Eagle Harbor
Point Blakely
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
Lead Alki Point
Anacortes
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlet
Burley Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Commencement Bay
Comnencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Dash Point
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Point No Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
Seafood
Category
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Fish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Shellfish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Fish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
No.
Samples
13
2
11
11
4
7
14
27
2
9
12
38
3
9
4
1
3
3
13
7
8
3
18
13
25
7
4
11
4
5
8
1
142
us
33
7
9
2
9
8
4
5
12
27
2
9
8
37
3
9
4
1
3
3
11
7
8
3
18
Percent
Detected
100
.
100
100
100
100
100
93
100
100
100
79
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
28
100
64
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
76
100
100
100
89
_
78
100
100
100
83
63
-
89
100
51
33
89
100
-
67
100
91
-
63
-
44
Summary Data
Mean
232.3
1.0
236.7
376.8
134.8
140.4
283.6
3.9
33.5
158.7
296.3
6.4
37.3
221.8
167.3
4.0
223.3
53.0
215.2
8.0
199.1
274.3
1.8
162.8
4.8
62.0
10.0
6.8
9.5
9.2
158.8
110.0
5.4
219.1
173.2
213.1
108.3
5.0
57.8
107.5
113.8
96.0
195.0
15.3
5.0
786.4
448.8
26.3
1.3
279.2
132.5
5.0
201.7
185.0
81.4
5.0
69.1
2.5
12.2
SE
41.2
0.0
23.9
53.0
10.9
36.3
43.7
0.5
29.5
19.9
97.8
1.8
2.7
50.7
69.5
-
119.2
2.9
27.0
1.7
43.0
60.0
0.6
29.7
1.2
35.1
3.5
2.1
2.1
3.5
29.7
-
0.6
16.2
19.4
48.6
28.7
0.0
27.0
25.8
42.4
16.9
52.3
4.2
0.0
464.9
199.4
7.7
0.3
120.7
48.3
-
111.2
92.6
20.6
0.0
32.5
0.0
4.7
(ug/kg wet wt) Nc
Minimum
40.0
1.0
140.0
120.0
102.0
80.0
17.0
0.5
4.0
85.0
40.0
0.5
32.0
46.0
62.0
4.0
80.0
48.0
100.0
3.0
67.0
207.0
0.5
17.0
0.5
2.0
4.0
1.0
5.0
2.0
80.0
110.0
0.5
2.0
46.0
62.0
5.0
5.0
5.0
40.0
5.0
40.0
5.0
0.5
5.0
2.5
90.0
1.0
1.0
2.5
5.0
5.0
5.0
85.0
5.0
5.0
2.5
2.5
2.0
Maximum
470.0
1.0
364.0
770.0
147.0
350.0
560.0
10.0
63.0
280.0
1.280.0
66.0
41.0
437.0
367.0
4.0
460.0
58.0
447.0
14.0
365.0
394.0
10.0
350.0
20.0
250.0
20.0
23.0
15.0
20.0
290.0
110.0
66.0
1,280.0
437.0
394.0
260.0
5.0
270.0
270.0
195.0
140.0
570.0
100.0
5.0
4,460.0
1,630.0
200.0
2.0
1.160.0
240.0
5.0
390.0
370.0
260.0
5.0
250.0
2.5
83.0
incarci nogen
Average
Case
IxlO"2,
6x10-*
1x10*2
2xlO"jf
1x10'*
7xlO"3
lxlO'2
2xlO"|
2x10-":
2x10*2
2x10*2
4x10 3
2x10*^
2x10"*
5x10"=
2x10"!
1x10*2
6x10"=
X A1W _
5x10-3
2x10 I
8x10'!?
1x10,
9xlQ-|
wAlU »
3xlO"3
6xlO"3
4x10*3
6x10*^
5x10",
8x10*3
6x10*3
3x10-3
1x10"^
2x10**
exlO"3
lxlO'3
6x10
6x10'*
1x10"^
3x10'=
1x10"^
2x10 ,
2xlO"3
6x10 *5
2x10**
SxlO'3
3x10-3
1x10';!
7x10 fi
8x10 *
6x10**
2x10
4x10-5
9x10**
6x10**
&X1U _
2x10"'
2xlO-J
ic Risk Index
High
Case
3x10-1
5xlO"3
3x10"!
5x10-1
IxlO'l
2xlO"l
4xlO"i
2xlO'z
4xlO"l
2x10'?
5x10-1
5x10-2
5xlO"2
3xlO"l
8xlO"2
1
8xlO"l
5x10-2
3x10
6xlO"2
ZxlO'l
1x10
*-*•*•" «
1x10 f
2x10-1
SxlO'f
2xlO"l
1x10-1
5xlO"2
7x10,
9xlO"2
2X10"1
- ,
3xl°Il
_1
2x10 i
6x10"^
_ "2
Sxio :?
3xl0'2
4x10
4xio";
3x10"^
7x10 ,
2x10,
IxlO'f
3x10 ,
2xio";
4x10 4
6x10 7
9x10^
1x10
i
ixio ;
IxlO't
3x10'^
5x10 ,
2x10-2
1x10 ,
2x10"^
C-4
-------
|C-2. (Continued)
jal Area
Sinclair Inlet
Edmonds
Edmonds
Agate Pass
Point Madison
Manchester
Point Jefferson
Eagle Harbor
Point Slakely
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
My Alki Point
Anacortes
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Budd Inlet
Burley Lagoon
Quartermaster Harbor
Commencement Bay
Commencement Bay
Dash Point
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Point Ho Point
Point No Point
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
Sinclair Inlet
Edmonds
Edmonds
Agate Pass
Point Madison
Manchester
Point Jefferson
Eagle Harbor
Point Blakely
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
All Puget Sound
Seafood
Category
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Shellfish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Shellfish
Fish
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shel 1 f i sh
Kelp/Ulva
Shellfish
Fish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Shellfish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Fish
Shellfish
Shel 1 f 1 sh
Fish
Shellfish
Kelp/Ulva
Nori
No.
Samples
10
25
7
4
11
4
5
8
1
141
96
33
7
11
2
8
9
4
5
12
17
9
10
18
3
9
4
1
3
3
11
7
8
3
4
10
9
2
4
11
4
5
8
1
82
93
33
7
Percent
Detected
80
48
29
75
18
100
100
100
100
50
81
85
57
100
100
100
100
75
100
100
71
44
100
89
100
33
50
100
100
67
100
100
50
33
75
100
89
100
75
91
100
100
100
100
87
100
48
43
Suimary Data (ug/kg wet
Mean
172.2
23.3
4.6
4.0
0.8
2.5
3.6
840.0
380.0
16.3
199.3
338.0
76.8
18.7
151.5
16.0
24.1
1.4
16.8
20.3
35.1
2.7
40.3
27.9
9.7
1.3
1.3
35.0
17.3
1.2
15.3
33.9
1.3
0.7
10.8
27.3
12.3
4.5
12.4
13.1
28.3
9.6
33.0
12.0
26.6
22.5
1.7
1.0
SE
34.6
10.3
0.9
1.2
0.2
0.9
0.4
200.0
-
3.0
33.1
135.7
36.8
1.6
108.5
2.9
4.1
0.6
3.2
1.2
9.8
1.6
9.5
6.4
3.3
0.4
0.6
-
6.4
0.4
2.4
3.6
0.4
0.2
3.5
2.4
6.0
1.5
3.6
6.3
20.7
4.2
6.8
4.2
1.6
0.5
0.3
wt) Nc
Minimum Maximum
1.0
0.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
1.0
3.0
430.0 1
380.0
0.5
1.0 1
2.5 4
2.5
8.0
43.0
1.0
20.0
0.5
4.0
14.0
1.0
0.5
7.0
1.0
5.0
0.5
0.5
' 35.0
10.0
0.5
1.0
22.0
0.5
0.5
1.0
15.0
1.0
3.0
1.5
0.5
3.0
3.0
10.0
12.0
0.5
1.0
0.5
0.5
290.0
200.0
8.0
7.0
3.0
5.0
5.0
.980.0
380.0
200.0
.980.0
,460.0
240.0
26.0
260.0
22.0
57.0
3.0
20.0
27.0
156.0
15.0
103.0
76.0
16.0
4.0
3.0
35.0
30.0
2.0
20.0
49.0
4.0
1.0
17.0
41.0
55.0
6.0
17.0
73.0
90.0
26.0
68.0
12.0
260.0
103.0
15.0
3.0
incarcinogenic Risk Index
Average High
Case Case
2xl°-3
— C
5x10 J
5x10"*
1x10"*
3x10"*
5xIOI?
9xlO"3
_5
2x10 I
2x10%
8x101
SxlO"6
lxlO'3
9x10*2
8x10"*
1x10 "c
2x10 *
9x10"*
ixio";
2x10"?
3x10"°
2x10-3
2x10 %
5x10'*
1x10"°
4x10"'
2x10%
A • rt"*A
9x10 *
1x10"]
8xlO_,
2x10
1x10"°
2x10%
6x10%
1x10*3
2x10'*
8x10-3
2xio";
6x10*3
6x10'*
2x10*2
1x10%
2x10'°
3xlO"7
5x10-2
4xlO"|
lxlO'3
OXiU
lxlO_f
- J»-^
5x10 r
SxlO"1
- _
2x10%
6xl°Il
7xlO"3
2xlO'2
7.B+OQ
2x10%
3x10%
2x10%
3x10%
2xlO"f
3x10%
5x10%
6xlO"2
2x10%
2x10%
2xlO"3
6x10'*
~_2
2x10-3
o i n~t
2x10 j
2x10"*
2X10"1:
3x10**
3xlO*2
1 1 n~"i
1x10
2x10%
1x10":
1x10%
4x10%
1x10%
5xlO'z
2x10-1
3x10%
2x10%
4xlO"4
C-5
-------
APPENDIX D
SUMMARIES OF CONTAMINANT CONCENTRATIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL SPECIES
AND LOCATIONS IN PU6ET SOUND
-------
TABLES
Number Page
D-l Summary of arsenic data by sample area and species D-l
0-2 Summary of cadmium data by sample area and species D-8
D-3 Summary of lead data by sample area and species D-l5
D-4 Summary of mercury data by sample area and species D-22
D-5 Summary of carcinogenic PAH by sample area and species D-28
D-6 Summary of total PCBs by sample area and species D-31
0-7 Summary of alpha-HCH by sample area and species D-38
0-8 Summary of total DDT by sample area and species D-42
-------
TABLE O-l.
SUMMARY OF ARSENIC DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AMD OPECIBS
O
I
(Detection Frequency!
Art*
Alkl Point
Anacortet
Birch Bag
Budd Inlet
Burley Lagoon
INO
(Specie* 1
ILittleneck cla*l
IButttr cl«m 1
IHorttneck clan 1
1 M V • M A
IA11 Specie* 1
(Specie* I
1 ••iiil
(Chinook ••l«on 1
IA11 Bptcitt 1
(Specie* 1
in. inquinata 1
ILittleneck cU«l
(Butter cl*« 1
(All Specie* I
(Specie* 1
IM. inquinata 1
IBoftahell elm* 1
ILittleneck cla«l
(Butter clan 1
(Manila clam 1
lUlva 1
IA11 Specie* 1
I8p«ci«« I
IButttr clam 1
_________ — ———+ — —
(All Bptci«« 1
DET 1 X
1
1
71
41
11
121
1
1
21
21
1
1
11
61
31
101
1
1
11
11
91
11
21
41
141
1
1
61
61
DET. 1
1
1
1001
10OI
1001
1001
1
1OOI
1OOI
1
10OI
1OOI
1001
1OOI
1
I
1001
1OOI
1001
1OOI
1001
1001
10OI
1
1
1001
1001
8u««ary Data
-------
TABLE 0-1. SUMMARY Of ARSENIC DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
rs>
IDataction Frao.uancyl
Aria
QuartarMttor
Harbor
CoMancaaant
Ba«
INO.
IBpaclas I
ILittlantck claul
IButtar cla* 1
(Manila cla« 1
IHorftnccfc cl«« I
IA11 0p*ci*» 1
IBpacia* 1
(Chinook talaon I
ICoho salmon t
(Pacific hakt 1
(RockfiaN 1
(Mallaya aollockl
I i ii 1 i ii ii
IToacod 1
(English tolt 1
(Starry floundarl
(Pacific tanddabl
(Rock tola 1
(Buffalo •culplnl
1 — +
(Market iquid 1
ILaalnaria 1
IN*r»ocyttit 1
(Ulva 1
(All Spacia* 1
DET. 1 X
1
*l
31
31
11
131
1
1
91
21
11
31
ai
SI
41
41
11
81
11
21
41
It
41
381
BuMary Data 1
DET. 1 N 1 MEAN ( BTD 1 MIN t MAX 1
1
1001
1OOI
10OI
1001
1OOI
1
1 001
1OOI
10OI
1001
1001
1001
1OOI
1OOI
1OOI
1001
1OOI
1001
1001
1001
loot
10OI
1
61
31
31
11
131
1
31
21
11
31
21
21
41
41
11
21
11
21
41
11
41
381
1
1
33731
4663 (
30401
13301
34941
1
1
13O2(
asooi
32OOI
18331
104001
242OI
177931
12231
207OOI
1413OI
100OI
66901
98731
133OI
13381
36931
1
1
9291
9161
10311
. 1
102BI
(
t
3631
9661
.1
10O2I
14141
22631
30881
939 (
. 1
91221
-1
3941
22621
. 1
8391
64101
1
1
27001
42001
I960!
19901
199OI
1
t
7101
21OOI
32001
BOOI
94001
B2OI
140301
9001
2O7OOI
77001
lOOOl
64OOI
42001
199OI
9401
3OOI
1
1
40301
92201
« — — 1
4O6OI
13301
922OI
1
1
190OI
290OI
32OOI
280OI
1140OI
402OI
2O4OO 1
26OOI
2070OI
206OO!
1OOOI
69OOI
92001
13301
27801
20700 !
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-t. SUMMARY OF ARSENIC DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND 8PECIE8
O
I
CO
(Detection Frequency 1
Area
Daih Point
(Species
(Heart cockle
IH. inquinata
IBentnose clam
i
I NO
1
1
J
1
1
ILittleneck claml
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
IButter clam
IA11 Specie*
ISpeciet
(Chinook salmon
(Pacific hake
(Rockfish
ISablafish
(Pacific cod
(English sole
IRock tole
(Market squid
(Lamlnaria
IhUraocgitift
lUlva
INori
IA11 Species
IBpaci**
IChinook »almon
I Sand clam
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
DET. t X DET. 1
1
I
11
11
41
41
at
lai
i
i
91
21
41
131
11
61
31
31
21
41
31
41
961
1
1
11
1 1
1
1
1001
1OOI
1001
1001
loot
1OOI
1
1
1001
1OOI
1001
1001
1OOI
1OOI
1001
loot
1OOI
10OI
1001
1001
toot
1
1
1001
10OI
Summary Data (ug/kg wet wt) 1
N 1
1
1
11
It
41
41
21
121
1
t
91
21
41
131
11
61
51
31
21
41
31
41
561
1
1
11
It
MEAN 1 BTO 1 MIN 1
1
1
1400 1
376OI
31351
24131
27151
27331
1
1
13391
1SOOI
14251
1831 1
2OOOI
37871
328OI
96671
34731
33831
8631
32231
269OI
1
1
9301
1400 1
1
1
14681
8471
3161
10781
1
1
8711
14141
3861
14941
. 1
15631
7091
75301
1O96I
5821
1191
4821
2597 1
1
1
. t
. 1
1
1
14001
37601
13001
19001
23301
14001
J
1
3401
soot
12001
5OOI
2OOOI
J80OI
24001
13001
27001
26001
7301
27301
3401
1
1
9301
14001
MAX 1
t
1
14001
37601
f
49801
3680!
30801
49801
t
1
32OOI
25OOI
20OOI
53001
20OOI
63OOI
i
43001
159001
423OI
39801
9601
3880
15900
930!
„_ 1
14001
-------
TABLE D-l. SUMMARY OF AR8ENIC DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
(Detection Frtqutncyl
Ana
Evtr»tt Hark or
Mukiltoo
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlat
IBptclat
INO.
I
(Littlonock claml
(Butter clM
(Ulva
(All Spaciai
1
1
ISpaclai I
ILlttlanvck claal
IButtar clM
(All SpacUi
(Special
(Chinook salnon
ILa«lnarla
INaraocyttit
(Ulv_
1 II 1 1 1 1 • Mil
INori
(All Spacitt
IBpaclaa
(Pacific cod
(English tola
•
1
-(
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
(Starry flounder!
IRock talc
1 _• m.
1
ILittlanack clanl
1 _ _o.
IButtar clam
i — _____ ______
IHor*«n«ck clam
1
1
DET. 1 X
1
1
11
11
31
71
1
61
61
121
1
71
31
21
31
31
181
1
1
41
91
41
61
91
41
11
OET. 1
SuMiaru Data (ug/kg w«t wt) 1
N 1
1 1
1 1
1001 11
1001 11
1001
1001
1
1
1OOI
1OOI
1001
1
1
1001
1OOI
1001
1001
10OI
1001
1
1OOI
1001
1001
1001
1OOI
1OOI
1OOI
31
71
(
61
61
131
1
71
31
21
31
31
181
t
1
41
91
41
61
91
41
11
MEAN 1 BTD 1 MIN I
1
29OOI
23OOI
3071
13361
1
17121
19281
18201
1
4741
321OI
39OOI
10971
1O2OI
18391
1
1
68901
63801
17291
98731
24401
40781
26801
1
1
. 1
19OI
8691
1
1
42OI
2811
3991
(
(
2481
2O9BI
7781
2791
8911
20391
1
1
39911
32331
4111
63711
6961
9O3I
. 1
1
1
29OOI
23001
4101
4101
1
1
126OI
16OOI
12601
1
1901
33801
339OI
8201
47OI
19OI
1
1
36OOI
21001
12001
90001
20001
31401
2680 1
MAX 1
1
1
290OI
23OOI
6801
29001
1
1
24001
224OI
1
2400!
1
1
8801
79OOI
44901
137OI
1
200OI
79OOI
1
I
126OOI
moot
2200!
196001
36001
49001
2680!
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE P-l. SUMMARY OF ARSENIC DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AMP BPECIE8
o
I
en
(Detection Fre
Area
Sinclair Inlet
Edaonds
Agata Pass
Point Madison
(Species
(Market squid
(All Species
(Species
(Pacific hake
(Striped parch
IRockfish
(Pacific cod
(English sola
(Rock sole
(Market squid
(All Species
ISptcitt
i ..,«_....— .•._*.—...-.—
IRockfish
(All Species
ISpecias
tSablafish
(Pacific cod
(NO.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
— 1
1
1
1
1
1
(Walleye polloekl
Manchester
ITomcod
(All Species
(Species
(Pacific cod
(All Species
1
1
1
1
1
luency 1
DET. 1 X DET. 1
1
1
21
311
1
1
11
21
91
21
61
71
61
331
1
41
41
1
1
21
11
31
31
111
1
1
41
41
1
1
10OI
1OOI
1
1
1001
1001
1001
1001
1001
1001
loot
1OOI
1
1OOI
1OOI
1
1
1001
1001
1001
10OI
10OI
1
1
1OOI
1OOI
Bunaiaru Data (ug/kg wet wt) t
N 1 MEAN 1 BTD 1 MIN 1
t
1
21
311
1
1
11
21
91
21
61
71
61
331
1
1
41
41
1
21
11
91
31
111
1
1
41
4!
1
1
28901
92361
1
t
40901
9OOI
17271
280OI
18831
28861
81331
32271
1
1
21291
21231
129OI
39001
234OI
10001
18821
1
1
48791
48791
1
21921
43161
1
1
. 1
1411
9391
11311
10421
9321
7O69I
37761
1
1
7991
7391
t
6361
. 1
12931
4381
11971
1
I
36031
36O3I
1
1
13001
120OI
1
I
40301
4001
BOOI
20001
100OI
12001
36OOI
4OOI
1
I
11001
11001
1
1
BOOI
33OOI
llOOt
9OO(
9001
1
1
70OI
7001
MAX 1
1
1
44OOI
196OOI
1
t
40301
60OI
24001
360OI
390O!
38001
221OOI
221OOI
«•" I
1
1
29001
29001
1
170OI
39OOI
_h-B 1
44001
14001
44001
1
1
94001
9400!
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABUE D-l. 8UHMARY Of ARSENIC DATA IY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
o
en
(Detection Frequency!
Area
Point
Eagle
Point
i
INC.
(Specie* 1
Jeffer*on(Paclfie hake !
(Pacific cod 1
(All Specie* 1
Hare or (Specie* 1
(Bivalve *pp 1
(All Specie* 1
Blakely (Specie* 1
(Bivalve *pp 1
1 ... +
(All Specie* 1
All Puget SoundlSpeciee 1
Ar ta* 1 ~~~ — ~~ 1
(Chinook ealnon 1
1
ICoho *ale>on I
(Pacific hake 1
(Striped perch I
(Rockfi*h 1
IBablefith 1
(Pacific cod 1
1 *
(Walleye pollock!
IToeicod I
1 *
(EnglUh cole I
1 *
IBtarry flounder!
1 «•
(Pacific canddabl
1 +
IRock *ole I
BueMary Data >
1
1
41
11
91
1
Bl
Bl
1
11
11
1
241
2!
Bl
81
201
191
131
71
9!
211
B!
It
201
1
1
1OOI
1OOI
1001
1
1
1OOI
1001
1OOI
1001
1
1
1001
1001
1001
toot
1001
1OOI
100!
1001
1001
1001
lOOt
1001
100!
1
1
41
11
91
1
1
Bl
81
1
11
11
1
1
241
81
Bl
8!
201
191
131
71
91
21!
8!
11
201
1
1
19291
34OOI
88801
29381
29381
(
1
37OOI
37001
(
993 (
29001
28441
9OOI
1768!
17931
4783!
4643!
19681
6928!
14791
207OOI
62O71
1
1
11001
.1
11981
1
9181
9121
1
. 1
. 1
I
7111
9661
18781
1411
6291
14O9I
3206!
41131
14111
62061
723!
. 1
9714!
1
10OOI
34OOI
10001
1
1
19OOI
19OOI
1
1
37OOI
37OOI
1
1
19O!
81001
9OOI
4OOI
BOOI
9OOI
7OOI
11001
9001
10001
9001
207001
12001
1
1
I
39001
34001
39001
1
1
44001
44001
1
1
3700!
37001
1
1
38OOI
2900!
1
40901
6OOI
1
29001
1
93001
126001
114OO!
1
40201
1
204001
26001
207001
1
20600 1
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-l. SUMMARY OF ARSENIC DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
IDtttction FrvquBncgl Bunnary Data (ug/kg w«t wt)
INO.
All Pugat Sound I8ptci«« t
Area* I 1
(Buffalo sculpinl
1 — . — — — — — — ,..-.— . M^. M*.
IHtart cockli 1
IM. Inqulnata 1
JBtntnot* C!M \
ISand clan 1
ISoftthall cla« 1
ILittlanack cla«l
I —••••»« •»«>• 4* •*.
IButtar clam 1
IManila clam t
1 Hoi* *•(!•€ k C I AM 1
IBivalv* «pp. t
IMarkat squid 1
ILAftlnarla 1
lUlva 1
INori 1
1A11 Sp»ci«« t
DET. 1 X DET. t N 1 MEAN 1 BTD 1 MIN t
1
1
11
11
4
31
41
It
11
401
301
_a
91
,
31
__ + f,.
91
131
91
+
71
171
71
2971
1 1
t 1
1001 11
1001 11
1OOI 31
1001 41
1001 11
10OI 11
1OOI 4OI
1001 301
1001 91
1OOI 31
+ — _+ —
1OOI 91
1001 131
1OOI 91
+ +
1001 71
1001 171
1OOI 71
10012971
1
10001
14OOI
29171
31391
14001
13301
29381
29391
.
28441
,
19201
+_.
3O22I
74461
91201
.
32691
9111
22791
32461
1
t
. 1
. 1
.
1O91I
14681
. 1
. 1
7631
10961
8841
.
6981
+
89OI
99811
2O33I
9911
9741
132OI
39171
I
I
10001
1400!
.
17201
19001
14001
13301
120OI
16001
I960!
.
19301
+_.
19OOI
13OOI
27001
t
*
19901
340 1
47OI
1901
MAX
10001
1400 1
37601
49801
14001
13301
40601
92201
•* 1
406OI
26801
44001
221OOI
92OOI
44901
— I
27801
38801
2210OI
-------
TABLE D-8. SUMMARY OF CADMIUM DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
00
(Detection Frequency 1 Boa
(NO. DET. 1 X DET. 1
Are*
Alki Point
Anecorte*
Birch Bay
Dudd Inlet
Burley Lagoon
(Specie* 1
ILlttloneck cla«l
(Butter clan I
1 — - — — •»
(Horieneck clam 1
1 __ — +
(All Specie* 1
(Specie* 1
(Chinook *al«on 1
(All Specie* 1
(Specie* 1
IM. lne,uinata 1
ILlttleneck cla*!
(Butter clam 1
(All Specie* 1
(Specie* 1
IM. inquinata I
(Softchell clam 1
ILlttleneck claml
(Butter clam 1
(Manila clam 1
(Ulva 1
(All Specie* 1
(Specie* 1
ILlttleneck clam!
IButter cla* 1
I
SI
41
11
01
Ol
11
71
31
111
I
1
11
11
61
11
21
4!
191
1
1
11
61
1
1
1001
1OOI
1OOI
1OOI
•
1001
1OOI
1001
1OOI
1
1001
1001
1OOI
loot
loot
loot
1OOI
1
I
1001
1001
wary Data (ug/kg
wet nit)
1
1
N 1 MEAN 1 8TD 1 MIN 1 MAX 1
1
1
81
41
11
131
1
1
81
21
1
1
11
71
31
111
1
1
11
11
61
11
21
41
191
1
t
11
61
1
2801
1421
2101
2321
11
11
1
14OI
2811
1671
2371
1
9911
77OI
3361
12OI
3441
1391
3121
1
1
39OI
1O6I
1
1
1381
1641
. 1
1491
1
1
01
Ol
1
. 1
631
291
791
1
. 1
. 1
961
. 1
23 1
221
1861
1
. 1
291
1
1
701
401
2101
4OI
1
1
11
It
1
1
14OI
ISO!
14OI
14OI
1
1
9911
77OI
1BOI
1201
3271
1021
1021
1
1
3901
SOI
1
1
47OI
3871
2101
47OI
1
1
1
11
It
*
1
14OI
3641
19OI
3641
1
9911
1
7701
4391
1
12OI
360 1
1471
1
7701
1
1
1
3901
1
1971
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-2. SUMMARY OF CADMIUM DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
I
IO
tDttflction Fr«qu«ncyl
Area
Bur lay Lagoon
QuarttrMattar
Harbor
Commancainant
Bag
INO.
(All 8paciai 1
t 1
ISpacias 1
1 j
ILittlanack claati
(Butter cla» t
(Manila cla« 1
IHortanack clan 1
IA11 Bpaciat 1
IBpaciaa 1
| i
(Chinook talwon 1
1 +
ICoho •almon 1
(Pacific haka t
1 ____________—__+___-
IRockflih 1
IWallaya pollock)
ITo«cod 1
lEngliih tola 1
IB tarry floundart
(Pacific canddabl
(Rock sola (
1 _________ _ 4 —
(Buffalo tculpinl
IMarkat iquid 1
lLamlnaria t
INftrftocyt ti& t
~— —— — — + —
tUlva t
OET. 1 X
1
71
1
71
31
31
It
141
1
1
31
11
It
41
21
at
31
41
11
11
It
21
41
i:
41
DET. 1
1
1001
1
1
1OOI
1001
1001
1OOI
loot
1
1
1001
9OI
10OI
toot
1OOI
toot
1OOI
1001
1001
901
10OI
1OOI
1OOI
loot
10OI
Bu
OMiaru Data (ug/kg wat wt) 1
N 1 MEAN 1 STD 1 MIN 1 MAX 1
t
71
t
1
71
31
31
11
141
1
1
31
21
11
41
21
21
31
41
11
21
11
21
4!
11
41
1
1401
1
t
4031
941
2021
2601
2841
1
1
71
31
31
91
91
91
21
31
21
11
21
34 (
2031
171 1
1121
1
|
961
1
1
1O6I
121
.
1611
. 1
1641
1
1
31
31
. t
31
It
11
11
11
. 1
O!
. 1
421
971
. 1
271
1
8OI
1
1
2741
80 1
.
171
2601
171
1
1
31
1 1
31
2)
41
41
11
21
21
11
21
41
1S2I
1711
85!
1
|
3901
1
1
360!
1041
3001
26OI
96OI
1
1
91
91
31
101
91
91
31
91
21
|
11
21
63 1
2801
171 !
148!
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE 0-2. SUMMARY OF CADMIUM DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
i
(Detection Frta.uancyl
Art*
Commancaamnt
Bay
Oath Point
IA11 Bpacla*
1
1
IBpacia*
IHaart cecklt
IN. intuinata
IBtntnott cla«
INQ
1
1
ILittlanick claajl
Elliott Bay
(Butter cla«
1
(All Bpaciat
(Bpaciat
ICMnook salnon
IK.. _..____ ____
(Pacific haka
IRockfl«h
ISaklafiih
(Pacific cod
(English cola
(Rock tola
IMarkat squid
ILaalnaria
INtriocyttit
(Ulva
1 ~ ™
INori
IAU Bp«ci«»
1
1
1
1
1
1
(
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
DET. 1 X DET. 1
36
1
11
41
41
21
121
1
SI
21
41
91
It
21
41
31
21
41
31
41
461
1
1
1
991
1
10OI
10OI
10OI
1OOI
1OOI
1001
1
891
1OOI
1OOI
791
10OI
40 1
8OI
1001
1001
1001
1001
1001
891
Bu
Mary Data (ug/kg mat wt) 1
N 1 MEAN ( 8TD ( MIN 1 MAX I
1
(
381
1
11
11
41
41
21
121
1
1
91
21
41
121
11
91
91
31
21
41
31
41
94 1
1
(
1
421
1
1
1801
128OI
931
380 (
1031
2961
1
71
161
71
21
661
11
61
371
1381
3701
811
1671
961
1
1
721
t
1
. 1
991
371
181
3391
1
41
61
41
21
11
81
91
481
781
381
1391
1101
1
1801
12801
401
3401
901
401
1
1
11
111
31
11
661
11
11
321
1041
2721
461
621
11
1
1
t
2801
1
1
1801
12801
1701
4201
1161
12801
J
1
t
131
20 1
121
81
661
21
201
411
1721
4371
1221
3671
4371
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-8. SUMMARY OF CADMIUM DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
I
Araa
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
IDeti
INO
ISptcitt t
(Chinook *almon 1
ISand clam 1
ILittleneck claml
I « »• i i X
IButttr clam t
lUlva 1
(All Specie* t
(Specie* 1
ILittleneck claml
IButtar clan 1
IA11 Specie* 1
ISptciftft 1
IChinook salmon 1
ILaminaria I
lN«rtocgstii t
tUlva 1
INori 1
IA11 Specie* t
18p»ci*ft 1
(Pacific cod 1
ICnglifth »ol« 1
1 Starry f loun !
N t MEAN 1 STD I MIN 1 MAX 1
1
1
11
It
It
11
31
71
1
7t
61
131
1
1
71
31
21
31
31
181
1
t
41
91
41
SI
61
1
1
41
801
4601
1301
931
1191
1
t
2811
1381
2191
1
t
81
1081
3641
18OI
2741
1371
1
1
11
11
61
11
233!
1
I
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
91
1991
1
821
401
971
1
1
91
361
11
1011
1O4I
1391
1
1
It
Ol
31
01
671
1
1
41
BO!
4601
130 1
481
41
1
1
2001
1OOI
1001
1
1
31
671
3631
1181
2O7I
31
1
1
It
1 !
3!
1!
ISO!
1
1
41
80!
460!
1301
981
4601
1
1
4471
1961
4471
J
t
141
13O1
3691
297!
3941
3941
i
21
1 I
101
11
3301
(CONTINUED)
-------
0-8 SUMMARY Of CARMIUM Q»TA BV SAMPLE AREA AMP
o
(Detection Frequency!
Area
Sinclair Inlet
Ednonds
Agate Pass
Point Madison
(NO.
(Species 1
(•utter claai 1
IHorft«n«ck clmm I
(Market squid 1
(All Species 1
(Species 1
(Pacific hake 1
(Striped perch 1
IRockfish 1
(Pacific cod I
(English sole 1
(Rock sole 1
(Market squid 1
(All Species I
(Species I
(Rockfish 1
IA11 Species 1
(Species 1
IBablefish I
(Pacific cod 1
(Walleye pollock!
ITomcod 1
IA11 Species 1
DET. 1
1
I
41
11
ai
181
1
11
ai
71
01
11
91
71
231
1
1
41
41
1
1
2!
11
91
31
111
JC DET. 1
1
1OOI
1OOI
1OOI
981
1
10OI
1OOI
881
. f
20 1
711
1OOI
781
1
1
1001
loot
1001
1001
1001
10OI
1OOI
SusMsary Data
-------
TABLE D-2. SUMMARY OF CADMIUM DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
»—»
U>
IDtttction Frt
i
Araa
Manchtttar
1 Special
(Pacific cod
IA11 Bp*ci«t
Point Jaf far»on(8pacia«
Eagla Harbor
Point Blakalu
All Pugat Sound
Araat
i
1
(Pacific haka
(Pacific cod
(All Bpacia*
ISpacia*
1
IBivalva tpp.
(All Bptcitt
ISptcitft
i
tBivalvt spp.
(All Bpacia*
(Bpacia*
1 _______________
(Chinook salmon
1 -. — -i .- i - i
ICoho talfton
(Pacific hakt
IStriptd perch
IRockfish
t It M •._•_•
(Sablafifh
(Pacific cod
IMallaya pollock
t Tomcod
tEngJ A*h volt
(NO.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
|
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
DET. 1 X
1
41
41
1
1
41
It
_^
91
1
1
81
81
1
1
11
It
1
1
21 1
11
at
21
191
111
81
71
91
6!
DET. t
1
1
10OI
1001
1
1
10OI
1001
.
1001
1
1
1OOI
1001
1
1
1OOI
1001
1
1
881
901
1OOI
1001
991
791
621
1001
1001
331
BuMMrv Data (tig/kg uitt utt) 1
N 1 MEAN 1 8TD 1 MIN 1 MAX 1
»
1
41
41
1
1
41
11
.
SI
J
t
81
81
1
1
It
11
1
1
241
21
81
21
201
141
13!
71
91
181
1
1
101
101
1
1
111
21
91
1
1
199 f
199 1
1
1
11OI
1101
1
1
61
31
1OI
41
91
41
91
41
91
1 1
1
1
41
41
1
1
81
. t
t
81
1
841
841
1
1
. 1
. t
1
1
41
31
81
41
61
71
181
11
41
11
1
t
91
91
1
1
41
21
21
1
t
801
801
1
1
1101
110!
1
1
11
11
11
11
11
11
1 1
21
21
1 i
1
191
191
!
201
21
2O t
\
290 i
2901
1
1
1101
not
1
1
141
91
2O t
61
201
23 1
661
6!
121
31
(CONTJNUED)
-------
TABLE 0-2. SUMMARY OF CADMIUM OATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND 8PECIE8
(Detection Frequency! Buewary Data (ug/kg wet wt> I
| «_._.««._«.«.«..»•.•..•..«••>_*• + •«._«.«•«»«.._*..*—«.VM»**B1IB««*M-~«-W<''*~**«- —-»*- — '—' I
INO. DET. I X DET. I N I MEAN I 8TD I MIN I MAX !
— 4- + -4- + 4. 4- + I
All Puget 8ound!Bpecle« t I It II t I
Area* I 1 | It | I | I
(Starry flounder! 81 10OI 81 51 31 21 1O!
I ______ 4. + + 4. _+ + + 1
(Pacific canddabt It 1001 II 21 .1 21 21
I——___ __«. 4. _—_«. 4. 4.—____+ + 1
(Rock tole I 101 531 191 31 51 it 20!
I—_____ + -4. ____4. 4. 4. __+ + 1
(Buffalo •culpinl II 1OOI II at .1 21 2!
I —_—— * __+ __+ 4. + + + 1
(Heart cockle ( II 1OOI II ISO) . I ieOI ISO I
I 4. * 4. 4. + «. + ,
IM. ine,uinata I 31 10OI 31 6971 9771 1401 12801
I + * + + + 4- 4- |
IBentnote claei t 41 1001 41 931 551 401 1701
I 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. + + (
(Sand claw I II 1OOI II BOI .1 BOI BOI
I * + + * + + 4- |
(Boftthell clan I II 10OI II 77OI .1 7701 77OI
| * + 4- + 4- 4- 4- |
ILittleneck claail 471 10OI 471 3141 1O4I 7OI 5601
I — 4- 4- —»• -4- -4- 4- 4- |
(Butter cla« I 301 10OI SOI 1211 631 401 3871
I • I_L __ 11> • ii i in ii Hi • mj«^aii»- 4 •• •-• -•••—»• fc i— _n am in jj_ _ij ILL j» w 4 t— • A • • •! M • ua • • A .. • i^ —-, »» A — „ ^ I
(Manila cla« I SI 10OI 51 2591 1381 171 3601
I — 4- —*•- + —«• + 4- 4- |
IHorteneck clan I 31 10OI 31 26OI 9OI 21OI 31OI
(Bivalve «pp. I 91 1OOI 91 1531 BOI 801 29OI
(Market t«uid I 141 10OI 141 471 661 21 25O!
I _________ 4. -4- _—4- * -4- 4- 4- |
ILaainaria I 91 1001 91 1571 621 671 280!
J ______ _ 4. 4- _—4- 4- •»• 4- 4- I
INereocyitit I 71 1OOI 71 3401 931 1711 4371
I _ _ 4. _ _4— 4- + 4- 4- 4- |
lUlva I 171 1001 171 1131 991 461 2971
(_________ 4. 4. 4. 4. 4- + + |
INori I 71 1001 71 2131 1291 621 394!
(All Speciet I 2661 B9I30OI 1131 1561 II 12BOI
-------
TABLE 0-3. SUMMARY OF LEAD DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
(Detection Frtqu»ncyl
INO DET. 1 X
Aria
Alki Point
Anacortai
Birch Bay
Budd Inlat
Burlay Lagoon
IQuartarrnactar
1 Harbor
1
ISptcitft 1
ILittlanack clam)
IButtar clam 1
I_ i
(All Speciti t
ISpaciat 1
(Chinook salmon 1
I 1 M •• •• • M H « lift
(All 8paci*« 1
tSpaclae 1
IN. inquinata 1
ILittlanack claml
IButtar clam 1
(All 8p*cit» 1
iBptcias I
IBort*hall clam 1
ILittlanack claml
IButtar clam 1
(Manila clan 1
lUlva I
(All Specie* 1
ISp*ci«t 1
1 — , ••.««.•. «._. _—— « !
(Butter clam 1
— —————————-+
IA11 Bpaciis t
tSptciǤ 1
!Littl«n*ck clam!
i
i
41
41
81
1
1
01
01
1
11
41
21
71
1
1
11
41
It
21
41
121
1
1
91
5!
1
t
41
DET. 1
1
1
BOI
toot
891
1
«
. 1
1
t
1001
BOI
671
781
1
1
10OI
10OI
1001
1OOI
1001
10OI
1
J
1001
1001
1
1
801
Summary Data (ug/kg w«t uit ) 1
N 1 MEAN 1 BTO 1 MIN 1 MAX 1
1
1
SI
41
91
I
1
at
31
1
1
11
91
31
91
I
1
11
41
11
21
41
121
1
»
51
51
!
1
51
1
t
611
1681
1081
1
1
91
91
1
2701
331
281
981
t
1
2701
63 f
1301
1O9I
114!
1101
t
1
961
96 1
1
1
61 1
1
1
491
931
861
1
1
01
01
1
1
. 1
161
201
811
1
1
261
. 1
71
891
73 1
1
1
381
381
1
1
6OI
1
1
91
401
91
1
1
91
91
1
1
2701
91
91
91
t
1
2701
4OI
1301
1001
91
91
1
1
401
401
1
:
51
1
i
i
1201
2601
8601
1
1
91
91
1
1
2701
401
401
2701
1
t
2701
1001
1301
11OI
1991
2701
1
!
1401
1401
!
1
140!
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-3. SUMMARY OF LEAD DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
Ar«a
O
(Detection Frtqu»ncyl
I «..
(NO. DET I X DET. I
Summary Data
(All Bptclt*
CoMaancaMitt (Saacia*
1 Chi nook talaon
ICoho talaon
(Pacific dak*
IRockfith
IUall*«« pollock
IToncod
(English toll
(Starry floundor
(Pacific tanddab
(Rock toll
(Buffalo tculpin
IM«rk«t squid
ILMin*ri«
IN«raocg«ti«
I_ ^__
lUIVA
IA11 Bptcitft
Dash Point ISp»ci«t
IHaart cockl*
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
31
21
11
101
1
01
Ol
11
41
21
ai
31
21
It
11
11
01
41
01
41
231
1
11
1001
671
10OI
B3I
10OI
10OI
10OI
1001
10OI
901
1001
501
loot
. I
1001
. 1
10OI
661
1
10OI
31
31
It
iat
(
91
31
11
41
21
SI
31
41
11
21
11
21
41
11
41
381
1
11
4971
881
3001
1991
91
91
31
61
Bt
291
361
11
471
921
181
91
2641
31
19091
1971
1
2301
1001
79 (
. 1
1811
1
01
01
. 1
41
61
11
131
11
. 1
691
. 1
01
1971
. 1
19761
7291
1
. 1
3601
91
3001
91
1
1
91
91
31
31
41
281
221
It
471
31
181
91
891
31
3701
It
1
230!
9701
1901
3001
97OI
I
1
91
91
21
1
101
121
3OI
481
21
471
lOOt
let
91
44OI
31
446OI
44601
!
2301
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-3. SUMMARY OF LEAD DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
I
I—'
•vj
(Detection Frequency)
rea ISpeciee
Dath Paint (Bentnoce clam
i
(NO.
1
1
1
1 »
ILittleneek claml
IButtar clam
(All Specie*
Elliott Bay ISpeciee
(Chinook salmon
(Pacific hakt
(Rockfich
1
(Sataleflth
1
(Pacific cod
lEnglith tole
IRock eole
(Market eo.uid
1 Laminar ia
,
(Nereocysti*
(Ulva
INori
1
IA11 Specie*
Everett Harbor (Species
I
(Chinook «almon
ISand clam
1
1
1
1
1
1
(
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ILittleneck clam!
IButtar clam
1
DET. 1 X DET. 1
1
1
ai
31
21
81
1
1
31
21
21
41
It
21
31
It
11
41
31
41
321
1
t
01
11
01
It
t
1
loot
1001
100!
1OOI
1
1
961
1001
301
331
1001
301
6OI
331
901
10OI
10OI
10OI
6OI
t
1
. 1
10OI
. 1
1001
Summary Data Cog/kg wet wt> 1
N 1 MEAN 1 BTD t MIN 1 MAX I
1
1
21
31
21
81
1
1
91
21
41
121
11
41
91
31
21
41
31
41
931
1
1
It
11
1!
It
1
1
131OI
971
2291
449 1
1
t
811
31
91
81
131
17»
31
11
311
1381
62OI
1331
761
1
1
9!
3901
31
210!
1
1
4931
61
1341
9641
1
1
71 (
It
101
91
. 1
191
21
It
691
26 1
9O9I
971
17BI
1
1
. (
. 1
. 1
. I
1
1
9901
901
1301
901
1
1
91
41
11
41
191
51
11
It
31
1001
1601
91
11
1
1
51
3901
s:
210!
1
1
16301
1001
32O!
1630!
1
1
1
2001
1
61
j
23!
1
201
19!
451
1
6!
2!
1
100!
16O!
1
11601
1
2401
1
116O!
1
!
!
9!
1
390!
1
S!
1
210!
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-3. SUMMARY OF LEAD DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
(—>
00
IDottction Frequency!
Ar«a
Evtrstt Harbor
Mukiltao
IBptcitf
lUlva
IA11 Saaclat
IBpocio*
1 ——————
INO.
1
I
1
1
-1
ILlttlantck cla«l
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlot
IButtar clan
(All Bpocio*
ISpaciat
(Chinook talnon
ILanlnaria
INaraocyttit
tUiva
INnri
(All 8p«cit»
IBpacla*
(Pacific cod
lEngliah tola
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-1
1
1
I8t«rry flounder 1
IRock tola
1
ILlttlinvck claml
IButtar clam
IMarkat »
-------
TABLE 0-3. SUMMARY OF LEAD DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
I
I Detect ion Frequency!
Araa
Edmonds
Agate Pan
Point Mad lion
(Species
(Pacific hak«
(Striped parch
IRocbfich
(Pacific cod
JEnglifh »ol*
(Rock »ole
(Market squid
(All Special
ISpiciat
IRockf lah
IA11 Specie*
I8p«ci*0
IBablefiih
1
(Pacific cod
(NO.
i
i
i
i
i
i
1
»
i
i
i
i
»
i
i
(Walleye pollock!
Manchester
IToftcod
1 -_
IA11 Specie*
(Specie*
(Pacific cod
IA11 Specie*
Point JeffersonlSpecies
(Pacific haka
(Pacific cod
i
i
i
i
1
i
— i
i
i
DET. 1 X
1
1
it
11
91
11
01
41
21
141
1
1
31
31
1
1
01
il
11
01
21
1
1
41
41
1
1
41
i 1
DET. 1
I
1
10OI
SOI
63 1
301
. t
971
291
441
1
1
791
791
1
1
. t
1OOI
201
. 1
181
1
1
1OOI
iOOt
1
1
1OOI
1001
N t
(
11
21
at
21
91
7!
71
321
1
1
41
41
1
1
21
It
91
31
11 1
1
1
4)
41
1
!
41
1 !
Summary Data (ug/kg wet uit )
MEAN t
1
1
131
931
81
1031
41
141
SI
191
1
1
41
41
1
1
11
It
11
11
11
1
1
31
31
1
1
41
3!
STD 1 MIN
1
1
. 1
1241
101
13BI
11
20 1
21
461
1
1
21
21
1
1
Ol
. t
It
01
11
1
1
21
21
1
1
11
. 1
1
t
1
131
91
It
31
31
11
11
11
1
1
11
11
t
1
11
11
11
11
11
1
!
1!
i :
!
1
3!
3!
MAX
131
1BOI
301
200!
91
96!
81
2001
1
1
71
71
1
1
1 1
11
31
11
|
31
(
1
1
SI
5!
1
*
5!
„ 1
3!
(CONTINUE*))
-------
TABLE D-3 SUMMARY OF LEAD DATA IV SAMPLE AREA AND 8PECIE6
O
I
tv>
O
IDataction Frequency!
1 — • •! i • • i
Area
Point
Eagle
Point
IA11 Species
Jefferson!
Marker (Special
(Bivalve spp.
(All Species
Blaftelv IBpeciee
(Bivalve spp.
(All Species
All Puget Bound (Species
ICkinook ealaon
ICoho talnon
(Pacific hake
(Striped perch
(Rockflih
(Saklefish
(Pacific cod
(Walleye pollock
IToacod
(English sole
1 Starr v flounder
(Pacific sanddab
IRock toll
i .....
(NO.
(
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
(
1
1
(
1
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
(Buffalo tculpini
i . .. _ « _
IHeart cockle
1
DET. I X
91
Bl
61
(
11
11
1
1
91
01
61
11
141
41
61
31
SI
Bl
61
11
91
11
it
DET. I
1
(
1OOI
1
1
1001
1OOI
1
1
1001
1001
1
1
211
. 1
1001
901
701
291
621
431
401
471
751
1001
471
1001
10OI
N 1
1
1
91
1
1
at
61
1
1
11
11
1
1
241
21
61
21
201
141
131
71
91
171
61
11
191
11
il
BuMary Data (ug/kg wit wt)
MEAN 1
1
1
41
1
1
6401
6401
1
1
3601
3801
1
1
341
91
91
931
71
71
191
31
121
171
21
471
171
181
2301
8TD 1
1
1
11
1
9661
9661
1
1
. 1
. 1
1
1
961
01
31
1241
81
61
941
41
161
161
11
. 1
291
. 1
. 1
MXN 1
1
1
31
1
1
4301
4301
1
1
3601
3801
1
1
91
91
21
91
11
11
It
11
It
31
11
471
1 1
18!
2301
MAX
9
1980
1980
380
38O
20OI
— 1
91
131
1801
30 1
201
20OI
121
3O!
i
481
21
471
1001
™-i 1
18!
23OI
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-3. SUMMARY OF LEAD DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
I
ro
(Detection Frequency 1
All Puget Bound ISpecie*
Area* 1
IM. lna.uinata
1.
(Btntnoit clmm
i _________ __ _
I Band clam
IBoftfhell clam
I NO
1
1
1
1
1
ILlttlaneck cla*t
11
IButttr cl-M
IManlla clam
IHorv«n«ck clam
1. ...
!8iv«lv* t pp.
market iquld
1.
lUlva
INorl
(All 8p«cl»«
1
1
1
I
1
1
1
1
I
1
DET. t X
1
1
11
21
It
It
271
281
41
11
91
31
t
71
91
161
41
18OI
DET. 1
1
t
loot
10OI
1001
1001
841
971
801
1001
10OI
211
,
781
711
94!
971
Summary Data (ug/kg wet wt)
N I MEAN 1
1
1
11
21
It
It
321
291
9!
1!
9!
14!
9!
7!
171
7!
691277!
1
1
27OI
13101
3901
270!
711
1771
991
3OO!
789!
31
_,
142!
101!
939!
771
1201
8TD t MIN !
t
1
. 1
4931
. 1
. 1
981
132!
941
. 1
991!
21
.
1941
701
1O94I
971
3481
I
1
2701
9901
390!
270!
51
9!
91
3001
380!
1 !
,
3!
3!
3!
31
It
MAX
270!
16301
390!
270!
270!
970!
1901
300!
i
1980!
8!
440!
160!
44601
2401
44601
-------
TABLE D-4. SUMMARY Of MERCURY DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIE!
ro
tv»
(Detection Frequency!
Are*
Alki Point
Anacorte*
Birch Bay
Budd Inlet
Burley Lagoon
INO.
(Specie* 1
ILittieneck cleat
IButter cla« 1
IHereeneck clam 1
(All Specie* 1
IBpeciee 1
l____— ————— —- 1
(Chinook *«le>on t
(All Specie* 1
IBpeciee 1
IH. ln«uinata 1
ILittieneck clMl
IButter cla* 1
(All Specie* 1
IBpeciee 1
IH. lne.ulnata 1
IBoftehell cleo) 1
ILittieneck claeit
IButter clae> 1
1 -- — • *
(Manila cla« 1
lUlv* 1
IA11 Specie* 1
(Species 1
ILittieneck claml
1 4- -
IButter clam 1
DET. 1 X DET. 1
1
61
41
11
lit
1
1
21
21
1
11
41
31
at
|
1
11
11
41
11
at
31
tat
i
i
it
41
1
1
IOOI
IOOI
IOOI
IOOI
1
1
IOOI
IOOI
1
IOOI
IOOI
IOOI
toot
t
1
IOOI
IOOI
IOOI
IOOI
IOOI
791
9at
1
t
IOOI
IOOI
Bumeery Data
N 1
1
1
61
41
11
111
1
1
at
ai
i
i
ii
41
31
81
1
1
11
11
41
11
at
41
131
1
1
11
41
MEAN 1 8TO
1
1
19.71 9.
17. Ol 6.
ao. oi
IB. 71 9.
|
I
191. 91193.
191. 91193.
1
1
22. Ol
16.31 7.
13. 71 iO.
16. Ol 8.
1
1
97. Ol
2O. Ol
2O. Ol O
2O. 01
20. 01 O
1.41 1
17. 11 14
1
1
20.01
16.01 8
(ug/k> wet wt> t
1 MIN 1 MAX 1
1
1
281
001
.1
161
1
1
441
441
1
1
• 1
901
971
121
1
1
. 1
. 1
001
. 1
001
111
871
1
1
. t
001
1
1
10. 01
8. Ol
20.01
a. Oi
1
I
43. 01
43. Ol
1
I
22. Ol
9. Ol
1. 01
1.01
1
1
97. Ol
2O. 01
2O. 01
2O. 01
2O. Ol
O. 91
O. 91
1
1
20. 01
4. 01
1
1
26. 01
20 01
20.01
26.01
1
1
26O. 0 >
260. Ol
1
1
22. Ol
2O. 01
2O. 01
22. Ol
1
1
97. Ol
•
2O. Ol
2O. Ol
20. Ol
2O. 01
1
3. Ol
S7.OI
I
1
20. 01
1
20. 01
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-4. SUMMARY OF MERCURY DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
CM
IDattction Frcquincyl
Area
Burlag Lagoon
Ouartaraaatar
Harbor
Co««*nc«*«nt
Bay
Daih Point
(NO.
IA11 Bptcia« 1
1 1
IBpacia* t
1 1
ILittlanack clan!
IButtar clam 1
(Manila cla« 1
IHor«*nccfc ci*« \
(All Special I
(Specie* 1
1 1
IChinook »almon t
1 .
ICoho t*lmon 1
(Pacific hakt 1
IRockfith 1
IU«lI«v« pollock)
t Starry floundtrt
ILaalnaria t
JNtreocyfttli 1
tUlVA 1
_____________ — +_ —
(All Species 1
(Specie* 1
• •
IHtart cockle 1
1H. inquinata t
IBtntnotft clam 1
1*
ILittleneck clam!
DET. 1 X
1
31
1
I
91
31
at
a
11
tai
i
i
91
21
11
31
11
11
01
Ol
41
161
1
1
11
It
41
31
DET. 1
1
10OI
1
1
1OOI
1001
M
1001
t
toot
1OOI
1
1
1001
1001
10OI
901
10OI
29 1
. t
. t
10OI
621
1
1
loot
loot
1OOI
1001
Summary Data (ug/kg mat uit) 1
N 1
1
1
91
1
1
91
31
31
11
121
1
1
91
21
It
41
It
41
41
11
41
261
1
1
11
It
41
31
MEAN t BTD 1
1
16.81 7.
1
1
20. 81 4.
18.71 2.
A
19.01 4.
A
26.01
20.31 4.
1
t
47.61 6.
90. 01 12.
4.01
22.61 37.
6. Ol
39.81 77.
0. 91 O.
0. 91
9.91 6.
23. 9) 36.
1
1
20.01
103. Ol
93.31 16
19.71 7.
i
161
1
1
761
311
981
. t
161
1
t
661
731
. t
761
. 1
901
001
. 1
391
191
1
1
. 1
. 1
381
911
MIN 1
... +_.
1
1
4. 01
1
1
14. 01
16. 01
14. Ol
f
26. Ot
14. Ol
1
1
39.01
41.01
4.0t
1. 01
6.01
1.01
O. 51
O. 91
2. 01
0. SI
1
1
20 01
103. 01
31. Ol
7.01
MAX 1
1
2O. Ot
1
1
27.01
20.01
23.01
26. Ot
27. 01
t
1
94. 01
99. Ol
4. Ot
79. 01
l
6. 01
196.01
0. 5!
O. 91
19.01
1 96. 0 1
1
1
20. 01
103 01
69. Ot
20. Of
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE 0-4. SUMMARY OF MERCURV DATA iV SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
I
ro
JDvtvction Frvqutncvl
Araa
Daah Point
Elliott Bay
Evtrttt Harbor
IBpacia*
(Butter claa
(All BMC* as
IBpaclat
ICbinoob aalaion
(Pacific haka
IRockfish
IRock aola
IMarkat t^uid
ILaainaria
IN0r«ocy*tit
lUlva
INori
(All BMC i at
IBpociot
(Chinook ial«on
I Sand claai
(NO.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t
1
(
-1
1
1
ILittlanack claml
Muklltao
IButttr cla*
1
(Ulva
|
IA11 Spaciat
ISpcclat
•
1
1
1
1
ILittlanack claml
IButtar clam
1
OET. 1 X DET. 1
11
tot
(
91
21
21
31
31
01
01
31
21
241
1
11
11
11
11
21
61
1
1
91
61
1
1
1001
1001
1
1001
1001
671
791
1OOI
. 1
. 1
1OOI
901
711
1
1
1001
1OOI
loot
1001
671
861
1
1
10OI
toot
8u
axaary Data (w|/kg wat wt> >
N 1 MEAN 1
1
1
11
101
1
1
91
81
31
41
31
21
41
31
41
341
1
1
11
11
It
11
31
71
1
1
91
61
1
1
20.01
40.31
1
91.01
3. Ol
A. 91
4.31
9.71
0.91
0.91
3. Ol
1.31
16. 11
39.01
3O. 01
12.01
10.01
1.21
12.91
1
t
16. 61
14. 21
8TD 1 MIN
30.
18.
0.
7.
3.
9.
0.
0.
1.
1.
23.
0.
14.
7.
9.
1
. 1
121
1
1
341
001
401
4OI
691
OOI
OOI
OOI
191
371
1
1
. 1
. t
. 1
. 1
761
171
1
1
6OI
091
20.
7.
20.
3.
1.
1.
9.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
39.
30.
12.
10.
0.
0.
3.
1.
1 MAX t
1
1
01
01
1
01
01
91
Ol
01
91
91
01
91
91
1
1
Ol
Ol
Ol
01
91
31
1
1
01
0!
1
1
20. 01
103.01
1
1
76.01
3.01
19. Ol
9.01
16.01
0. 91
0. 91
4. 01
3. Ot
76.01
1
1
39. Ol
30. 01
12. 01
10. Ol
2. 01
39.01
1
1
20. 01
20. 01
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE P-4 SUMMARY OF MERCURY DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
in
(Detection Frequency 1
Area
Mukilteo
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
1
IA11 Specie*
1
iSpecles
tChinook ttlmon
tt-Minarla
IN«r«ocgctit
lUlva
INori
IA11 Specie*
(Specie*
INO.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
t Starr u floundtr 1
ILittleneck claml
Edmonds
Agate Past
IButt*r clam
1 _,_._., _ _ _ ,_
SHortanack clam
IMarket tquid
(All Specie*
(Specie*
IRock*i*h
IRock sola
(Market *o.uid
IA11 Specie*
ISpeciet
IRockf ifth
(All Species
i
4 -. — •
t
l
l
t
1
l
t
t
t
i
l
DET. 1 X
11
71
11
Ot
31
It
121
1
1
31
41
41
11
11
131
1
1
91
31
21
1OI
1
t
31
31
DET. 1
1
1
1OOI
1
1
loot
331
. 1
10OI
331
671
1
1
781
tool
1001
1001
1OOI
931
1
t
1OOI
751
10OI
911
I
1
731
731
SuflMary Data (ug/kg wet wt> 1
N 1
11
71
31
2t
31
31
18t
1
1
41
41
41
11
11
141
1
t
31
41
21
111
1
1
41
41
MEAN 1
t
1
13 31
1
33.91
O. 71
0. 91
2.31
O. 71
last
1
1
10. SI
27.81
28.31
27.01
22. Ot
22.61
1
t
2O. 61
2.01
4. 31
10.91
1
1
12. 41
12. 41
8TD 1
8
9
0
0
1
0.
17.
6.
8.
9.
10.
21.
0.
2.
16.
7.
7.
1
1
131
1
1
601
291
001
331
291
421
1
1
931
661
001
. 1
. 1
481
1
1
361
821
121
431
1
1
30 1
30!
MIN
1
22
0
0
1
0.
0.
1.
13.
21.
27.
22.
1.
3.
1.
3.
1.
1.
1.
1
1
1
Ot
1
1
01
91
91
01
31
91
1
1
01
01
01
Ot
01
01
t
1
01
Ot
01
01
1
1
31
5!
MAX 1
1
1
20. 01
1
1
49. Ot
l.OI
0. 3!
4. 01
l.Ot
49.01
t
t
17. Ot
• ™ I
34. Ot
41.01
27. Ol
22.01
IB _ 1
41. 01
1
1
93. 01
3. Ol
6. 01
93.01
1
!
17. Ol
17. 01
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-4. SUMMARY OF MERCURY DATA 8V SAMPLE AREA AND BPECIE8
O
IN)
a\
IDttiction Froqutncyl
Area
Point
1 Species
Madison (Baelefish
(Pacific cod
(NO.
IWalleye pollock!
IToMcod
(All Species
Manchester (Species
(Pacific cod
Point
Eagle
Point
All Pt
Areas
(All Species
Jefferson (Species
(Pacific hake
(Pacific cod
(All Species
Harbor (Species
(Bivalve spp.
(All Species
Blakely (Species
tBivalvff tpp.
(All Species
jgtt Bound I8p*ciet
(Chinook talmon
ICoho ft«l«on
(Pacific hake
IRockfish
i
i
i
i
i
i
-i
i
i
i
i
i
1
1
i
i
DET. 1 X
1
ai
n
41
31
iot
1
1
41
41
1
1
41
11
81
1
1
81
Bl
1
11
11
1
1
241
21
71
121
DET. 1
1
1OOI
1001
801
1OOI
911
1
1
1OOI
1OOI
1
1
1OOI
1001
1OOI
1
1
1OOI
1001
I
(
1OOI
loot
1
1
loot
1001
1001
781
Bususary Data tug/kg wet wt) t
N 1
1
21
11
at
31
111
1
1
41
41
1
1
41
11
91
1
81
Bl
1
11
11
1
1
24 1
21
71
161
MEAN
12.
13.
18.
9.
13.
28.
28.
9.
26.
9.
33.
33.
12.
12.
93.
30
4.
16.
1
1
91
01
11
31
11
1
1
31
31
1
1
91
01
61
1
1
01
01
1
1
01
01
1
01
01
61
41
BTD 1
13.
30.
2.
20.
41.
41.
2.
9.
19.
19.
46.
12.
2.
21.
1
1
441
. 1
821
921
741
1
371
37 1
1
1
921
. 1
421
1
1
211
211
1
1
. 1
. 1
1
1
361
731
191
96 1
MIN 1
1
1
3.01
13.01
0. 91
3.01
O. 91
1
1
3.01
3. Ol
1
1
3.01
26. Ol
3.01
1
1
10.01
1O. 01
1
1
12.01
12.01
1
1
20.01
41. 01
3. Ot
1. Ol
MAX 1
1
1
22. 01
13.01
73.01
8.01
73. 01
1
1
90 01
9O. Ol
1
1
9. Ol
26. Ol
26. Ol
1
I
68. 01
68. Ot
1
1
12.01
12. 01
1
1
260. Ot
99. 01
9. 01
79. 01
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-4. SUMMARY OF MERCURY DATA BY SAMPLE AREA AND BPECIEB
O
ro
ID*tflction Frequency! Sum«*rg D*t*
-------
TABLE 0-8. SUMMARY OF CARCINOGENIC PAH BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
ro
00
IDit*ctian Fr*q
i
Araa
Alki Paint
Birch Bay
ISpaciaa
ILittlanack clai
IButtar tlmm
I •^mfmmmmm»mm»mi-Mjim.-i-j
(All Bpaciaa
ISpaciaa
INC.
1
• 1
1
1
Itittlanack clmmt
Budd Inlat
IButtar clmm
I Ml Bpaciaa
IBpaciaa
ISoftaaoll claa
1
1
1
•1
1
ILittlanack claal
Bur lav Lagoon
OuartariMatar
Harbor
ICofflfflancanant
IB*u
1
IBivalva app.
1
lUlva
(All Bpaciaa
IBpaciaa
IButtar cla«
•
IA11 Bpaciaa
IBpaciaa
1
1
1
1
1
1
ILittlanack claal
1 •• • •«• * "
IButtar clmm
(Manila cla«
IA11 Spaciaa
IBpaciaa
lUlva
1
1
1
1
uancul
Buawary Data lug/kg mat ut> 1
i
DET. 1 X DET. 1 N 1
1
01
01
Ol
1
1
01
01
Ol
1
11
Ol
Ol
01
11
1
1
01
01
1
1
01
11
11
21
1
1
01
1
I
. 1
. 1
. I
1
1
. I
. 1
. i
1
1
1001
. 1
. 1
. 1
201
1
1
. 1
. 1
1
1
. 1
10OI
1001
671
1
1
. 1
1
1
11
11
• ••^••la
21
1
11
11
21
1
1
11
21
11
11
91
1
11
11
1
11
11
11
1
1
11
MEAN 1 BTD 1
1
1
41
41
41
1
41
41
41
1
2831
201
6OI
12OI
1011
1
1
41
41
1
1
41
91
191
81
1
1
480!
1
. 1
.1
01
1
1
. 1
. 1
01
1
1
. 1
Ol
. 1
. 1
not
i
i
. i
. i
i
i
. i
. i
. i
61
i
i
. i
MIN 1
1
1
41
41
41
1
1
41
41
41
1
1
2831
20 1
601
12OI
201
1
1
41
41
1
1
41
91
191
41
1
1
480 1
MAX 1
1
1
41
41
41
1
1
41
41
41
1
2831
201
601
12OI
2831
1
1
41
41
1
1
41
91
191
191
1
1
4801
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE 0-9. SUMMARY OF CARCINOGENIC PAH BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
ro
vo
(Detection Frequency!
Arc*
C omm* n c ••• n t
Bay
Dash Point
(All Special
1
1
(Special
(NO
IBantnoie claai
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
ILittlanack
(All Bpiciai
ISptcitt
i ».._._.._«._.«._
lUlva
(_.•__ _ _ _
(All Spaciai
(Specie*
(Sand clan
ILittlanach
cla«l
1
1
1
1
deal
(Butter cla« 1
Mukiltao
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
lUlva
IA11 Spaciai
(Special
ILittlanack
(flutter cla«
(All Bpeciei
(Special
(Ulva
(All Bpeciei
(Specie!
ILittleneck
1
cla«l
1
t
1
1
1
1
1
claml
Bu
Mary Data
-------
TABLE D-9. SUMMARY OF CARCINOGENIC PAH IV SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
CO
O
(Detection Frequency 1
1
SuMsary Data (us/kg wet wt> I
(NO. DET. I X DET. INI MEAN 1 BTD I HIN 1
Area (Species
Sinclair Inlet (Butter cla«
(All Species
Rollino, Bey (Species
(Rock crab
(All Species
Eagle Harbor (Species
(Rocl crab
1 Bivalve spp.
(All Species
Point Blakely (Species
(Bivalve spp.
(All Species
All Pugat Sound (Spec las
IRock crab
IBantnose cla«
ISantf clan
(Boftshell claai
I MM M •»•••• H
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
(
(
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
(Littleneck claul
(Butter clais
(Manila clam
(Bivalve spp.
(Ulva
1 IA11 Specie*
1
1
1
1
1
1
01
11
1
01
01
1
1
41
61
101
1
1
11
11
1
1
41
21
11
11
21
11
11
71
01
191
1 1
1 (
. 1 11
SOI
1
1
10OI
791
831
1
1
10OI
1OOI
1
SOI
1001
1001
1001
221
131
10OI
701
. 1
491
21
1
11
11
1
1
41
81
121
1
1
11
11
1
91
21
11
11
91
81
It
101
91
421
1
41
41
1
1
81
81
1
1
9OI
1781
139 (
1
1
421
421
1
42 (
291
41
283 (
81
31
191
1931
2621
831
1
. 1
11
1
1
. 1
. 1
(
1
361
2411
2031
1
1
. 1
. 1
1
371
281
. 1
. 1
71
11
. 1
220 1
14OI
1481
1
1
41
41
1
1
81
at
1
1
161
61
61
1
1
421
421
1
1
81
91
41
2831
41
31
131
61
120 1
31
1
MAX 1
1
1
41
j
91
1
1
1
81
1
81
1
1
1
971
7481
7481
1
1
421
421
1
971
481
41
2831
20 1
91
191
7481
4801
7481
-------
TABLE 0-6. SUMMARY Of TOTAL PCBB BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
l
Co
IDvtaction Frequency!
BUM
tary Data (up/kg uat ut >
INO. DET. 1 X DET. I N 1 MEAN 1
Art*
Alki Point
Anacortt*
Birch Bay
Budd Inlat
Bur lav Lagoon
Quartaraaatar
Harbor
(Commencement
IBay
1
(Bpaciat 1
ILittlanack clam)
IButtar cla« I
IA11 Bpacia* I
IBpaciat 1
1 — _______ 1
(Chinook calmon i
(All Bpacia* 1
IBpacla* 1
1 _______________ |
ILittlanack claml
IButtar claw 1
(All Sptciat t
IBpacian I
lUlva 1
(All Bpaciat I
IBpaciai 1
IButtar claw <
IA11 Bpacia* 1
IBpacia* 1
• f
ILittlantck claml
IButtar claw 1
(Manila clam 1
(All Sp«ci«* 1
ISpccia* 1
1 1
(Chinook salmon 1
1
1 1
t
11
21
1
1
SI
21
1
1
01
01
01
1
1
01
01
1
1
11
11
1
11
11
1 1
31
1
1
31
1
1OOI
.
1OOI
1001
1
1
1OOI
1OOI
1
1
. 1
. 1
1
1
. 1
. 1
1
1
1OOI
10OI
1
1
10OI
toot
10OI
1001
1
1
1001
1
11
.
11
21
1
1
21
21
1
1
11
11
21
1
i
41
41
1
1
11
It
1
1
11
11
11
31
1
1
SI
2.
6.
4.
29.
23.
1.
1.
1.
10.
10.
7.
7.
4.
6.
6.
6.
13O.
1
1
901
101
301
1
1
OOI
001
1
1
OOI
001
OOI
J
|
OOI
OOI
1
t
201
201
1
1
BOI
901
901
O7I
1
1
601
BTD 1
1
. 1
.
. 1
2.931
1
1
9.661
3.661
»
1
. 1
. 1
0.001
1
1
O. OOI
O. OOI
I
1
. 1
. 1
1
1
. 1
. 1
. (
1. 121
1
!
63. 94 1
MIN
2.
6.
2.
21.
21.
1.
1.
1.
1O.
10.
7.
7.
4.
6.
6.
4.
62.
1
1
1
301
101
sot
1
1
OOI
OOI
1
1
OOI
OOI
OOI
1
1
OOI
OOI
1
1
201
201
1
1
BOI
301
9OI
BOI
1
1
00!
MAX
2.
6.
6.
29.
29.
1.
1.
1.
10.
10.
7.
7.
4.
6
6.
6.
213.
1
1
1
1
9OI
1OI
101
1
1
OOI
OOI
1
1
OOI
OOI
OOI
1
1
OOI
OOI
1
t
201
201
1
1
BOI
BOI
90 1
90!
1
!
00!
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE P-6, SUMMARY OF TOTAL PCB8 IV SAMPLE AREA AND 8PECIE8
?
CO
(Detection Frequency)
INO. DET. 1 X DET. 1
Area
Bay
Doth Point
Elliott Bay
(Specie* 1
ICoho salaon 1
(Pacific hake 1
(Rockfleh 1
(Ualleye pollock!
tTo«coe' 1
(English tola 1
IBtarry flounder 1
(Market 80.1*14 1
I Illl ••••«• 4
(Laalnarla 1
INereocystls 1
(Ulva I
(All Species 1
(Species 1
IBtntnoit claa 1
ILittleneck clasil
(All Species 1
ISpecle* 1
(Chinook saleion 1
1 «
(Pacific hake I
IRockfish 1
IBablafish 1
(__.•__ _ _ _ .a. _« _
(Pacific cod 1
(English sole 1
1
1
21
11
41
21
11
41
41
11
01
01
01
241
1
1
21
11
31
1
1
91
21
31
121
11
281
1
1
1001
1001
IOOl
IOOl
IOOl
1001
1001
1001
. 1
. 1
731
1
1
1001
IOOl
1001
1
1
1001
1001
IOOl
IOOl
IOOl
1001
N 1
1
1
21
11
41
21
11
41
41
11
41
11
41
331
1
1
21
11
31
1
1
91
21
31
121
1 1
281
SUM
iery
MEAN I
86.
143.
86.
32.
94.
119.
143.
177.
10.
10.
19.
83.
8.
3.
6.
74.
197.
116.
66.
271.
418.
1
1
OOI
OOI
291
901
OOI
791
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
941
1
1
101
901
701
1
1
891
9OI
OOI
O8I
OOI
791
Data
BTD
16.
16.
19.
91.
97.
0.
1O.
68.
6.
9.
48.
31.
73.
94.
484.
Cug/kg wet wt> 1
1
1
1
971
. 1
801
091
. 1
071
191
. 1
OOI
. 1
OOI
471
1
1
931
. 1
471
1
1
431
821
931
261
. 1
911
MIN
74.
143.
73.
19.
94.
68.
39.
177.
10.
10.
10.
10.
3.
3.
3.
34
139.
99.
23
271
20.
1
1
1
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
MAX 1
1
1
98.001
143.001
•
108. OOI
46. OOI
OOI 94. OOI
OOI 190.001
OOI 263. OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
1
1
20 1
901
201
1
1
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
001
177. OOI
10.001
1
10. OOI
30. OO 1
263.001
1
1
13.001
3. 901
13. OOI
1
1
179. OOI
180 OOI
199. OOI
360. OOI
271. OOI
2O60. OO 1
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE 0-6. SUMMARY OF TOTAL PCBS SV SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
i
OJ
CO
tOttftctlon Frequency!
Area
Elliott Bey
Everett Harbor
Mukilteo
Point No Point
INO.
1 Spec let 1
IRock tale 1
(Market equid I
»_ .1.
ILaeilnarla 1
I_ __ — .A.
INtrtocyttif 1
lUlva 1
1 w«* .••«••.«,«•.•••«. «. +«»
INori 1
IA11 Specie* I
(Specie* 1
IChinook »• 1m on 1
(English sal* 1
(_. ___,_.___________.•, __
(Starry flounder 1
IDungenvift crab 1
ISand cla« I
Ii *
ILittleneck cle*l
(Butter cla* t
lUlva 1
(All Specie* 1
ISpeclet 1
1 ______-.___—_—— |
ILittleneck claml
(Butter clae> t
(All Specie* 1
ISpeclet t
(Chinook ftAlmon I
DET 1 X
i
41
31
01
01
01
01
621
1
1
11
331
SI
91
It
.
It
It
01
471
1
1
11
21
31
1
1
71
OET. 1
toot
1001
. 1
. 1
. t
. 1
B3I
1
1OOI
971
tooi
831
1001
.
1001
1001
. I
9OI
1
1
1OOI
10OI
1OOI
1
t
10OI
N 1
1
41
31
21
41
31
41
781
1
It
341
51
61
11
It
11
31
921
t
1
11
21
31
»
1
71
BUM
Mry Data
MEAN 1
199.
121.
10.
10.
10.
10.
203.
104.
26.
22.
11.
11.
7.
6.
10.
23.
6.
4.
9.
90.
1
1
SOI
001
001
001
OOI
001
231
t
OOI
431
801
131
701
2OI
201
OOI
821
1
401
701
271
»
1
861
8TO
9O.
94.
0.
0.
0.
0.
343.
18.
6.
8.
O.
2O.
1.
1.
43.
(ug/kg wet wt)
J
1
1
191
961
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
681
1
. 1
91 1
761
121
. >
.
. 1
. 1
OOI
411
1
1
. 1
411
401
1
1
981
MIN
49
61
10.
10.
to.
10.
10.
104.
1.
16.
1.
11.
7.
6.
10.
1.
6.
3.
3.
21.
1
1
1
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
1
OOI
791
OOI
791
701
20 1
20 1
OOI
791
1
1
40 1
701
701
1
1
00!
MAX
249. OOI
230.001
10. OOI
10. OOI
10. OOI
10. OOI
•— 1
2060. OOI
1
104. OOI
99. 00 1
33.001
24. OOI
11.701
7.201
6.201
10. OOI
104. OOI
1
1
6. 401
9. 7OI
6. 401
1
1
149.001
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-6. SUMMARY OF TOTAL PCB8 BY SAMPLE AREA AND 8PECIE8
a
i
Area
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
(Specie*
(Laatinaria
INeroocyati*
(Ulva
INori
(All Specie*
(Specie*
(Pacific cod
(EnglUk sole
(Oet
INO.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
(Starry flounder!
ILittleneck claal
Port 8u*an
Edeiond*
(•utter claa>
1
(Market •a.uid
(All Specie*
(Specie*
(Engliih *ol*
(All Specie*
(Specie*
(Pacific bake
IRockfUh
(Pacific cod
1 «_«_•.»_« ___
lEngliftti sol*
(Rock *ol*
(Market *a,uid
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
ection Frequency 1 BuM«ry
DET. 1 X
1
1
01
Ol
01
01
71
1
1
31
41
91
11
11
21
161
1
01
Ol
1
1
11
91
21
91
41
71
DET. 1
J
391
1
1OOI
1001
1001
1001
1001
1001
1001
1
1
. 1
1
1
1001
1001
1001
1001
10OI
1001
N 1
1
31
21
31
31
181
1
1
31
41
91
11
11
21
161
1
1
It
11
1
1
11
91
21
91
41
71
MEAN 1
10.001
10.001
1O OOI
10. OOI
29.891
96. 331
111.291
282. 201
19.601
23. OOI
87. 90 (
140. 161
1
I
1.791
1. 791
1
111.001
89.401
289.001
42. 20 1
61.791
124. 861
Date 1
BID 1
1
1
0. OOI
0. OOI
O. OOI
O. OOI
33. 21 1
31.341
102. 191
164. 491
.1
. (
7.781
141. 98!
!
. 1
. (
1
1
44.241
366.281
23. 81 1
26.871
74.311
MIN 1
1
1
10. OOI
10.001
10. OOI
1O. OOI
1O. OOI
1
1
3O. OOI
39.001
96.001
19.601
23. OOI
82. OOI
19.601
1
1
1.791
1.791
1
1
111.001
38. OOI
30. OOI
21. OOI
33 00 1
24 OOI
MAX 1
1
1
10. OOI
10.001
10.00)
10. OOI
149. OOI
1
1
1
91.001
299. 00 1
918.001
19.601
23.001
93. OOI
918.001
1
1
1.791
1. 791
i
i
111.001
142.001
948. OOI
81. OOI
88.001
219.001
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE 0-6. SUMMARY OF TOTAL PCB8 BY SAMPLE AREA AND BPECIE6
O
CO
tn
IDttvction Fr«<
Araa
EdMondc
Agata Pan
Point Madiaon
(All Bpaciai
... I
1
(Bpaciai
I *. __*«.«•— «.
(Rockfiih
1 in u M — i
(All Bpaciai
IBpaciaa
IBablafiab
(Pacific cod
INQ.
1
1
1
t
1
1
1
__.• I
1
lUallaya pollockl
Manchaitar
IToacod
(All Bpaciai
t8p«ci«t
(Pacific cod
(All Bpaciai
Point JaffaraonlSpaciaa
(Pacific haka
•
Eaala Harbor
Point Blakalu
(Pacific cod
(All Bpaciai
(Special
IBivalva app.
(All Bpaciai
(Special
IBivalv* ipp.
i
IA11 Spaciai
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
[iiency 1
OET. 1 X DET. t
1
1
241
1
1
41
41
1
21
11
91
31
111
1
1
41
41
41
It
91
1
1
41
41
1
1
01
01
1
1001
1
1001
1001
1
1
10OI
1001
1OOI
1001
1001
1
1
1001
1001
10OI
1OOI
loot
1
1
901
901
1
1
. 1
. 1
Suamarv Data (ug/kg wat wt) 1
N 1
1
1
241
1
1
41
41
1
1
21
11
91
31
111
1
t
41
41
1
41
11
91
1
1
81
81
1
1
11
11
MEAN 1
102.
90.
90.
193.
249.
31.
89.
88.
320.
320.
78.
283.
119.
12.
12.
9.
9.
1
1
OOI
1
1
291
291
1
1
9OI
OOI
4OI
OOI
731
1
1
291
291
291
— +-
OOI
201
1
1
631
631
1
1
OOI
OOI
8TD 1
1
1
HO. 131
1
1
26. 68 1
26.681
1
1
37. 481
1O. 31 1
41. 981
73.891
1
1
296.901
296.901
1
(
20. 931
. 1
93. 28 1
1
1
8. 961
8. 961
1
1
. t
. t
MIN
21
68.
68.
127.
249.
24.
49.
24.
112.
112.
62.
283.
62.
9.
9.
9.
9.
1
1
1
OOI
1
1
OOI
001
1
1
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
1
1
OOI
OOI
1
1
OOI
OOI
OOI
1
1
OOI
OOI
1
1
OOI
001
MAX 1
1
1
948. OO 1
1
1
129.001
129.001
1
1
180. OOI
249. 00 1
49. OOI
132.001
249.00!
1
1
684. OOI
684. OOI
1
1
1O8. OOI
• 1 H H 1 1 II 1 f
283. OOI
283. OO 1
1
1
28. OOI
28. OOI
1
1
9. OOI
5. OO!
(CONTINUED)
-------
OF
PC|f |V SAMPLE AQEA, AMP §ff6?EB
a
CO
IDatactlan Fr<
INO
All Pugat Bound IBaaciat 1
Ar aa • I 1
(Chinook talaon 1
ICoho ftalMon 1
(Pacific aaka 1
IMackfiih 1
IBaalafiab 1
(Pacific cad (
IWallaya pollock!
IToacod 1
lEngliah tola 1
(Starry fleundarl
IRacfc aala 1
IDunaanati crab 1
IB«ntnot» cla« 1
(Band cla« 1
ILittlanack cla«l
IButtar claa 1
(Manila claa 1
(Bivalva tpp. 1
market »tuid 1
ILaninaria 1
IN»r»ocytti* t
lUlva 1
INori 1
. DET. 1 X
1
1
241
21
ai
161
141
121
71
41
741
141
at
91
21
11
61
71
11
41
131
Ol
01
01
Ol
>o.utncy|
, -
Buna
W«
DET. 1 N 1 MEAN 1
1 1
1 1
1OOI 241
1OOI
1001
toot
1001
1001
1OOI
1001
97 (
I OOI
1 ' .
1OOI
831
1001
1001
861
881
1001
441
1001
.1
. 1
. 1
21
Bl
161
141
121
71
41
761
141
at
61
21
11
71
81
11
91
131
91
71
171
71
76.
86.
110.
92.
78.
839.
31.
80.
181.
149.
108.
11.
8.
11.
6.
7.
6.
11.
122.
1O.
10.
11.
10.
1
941
OOI
291
961
97 (
381
711
291
071
791
631
131
101
701
491
431
901
7BI
231
OOI
OOI
181
OOI
Data
8TD
96.
16.
41.
39.
92.
206.
11.
38.
349.
193.
79.
8.
6.
6.
6.
a.
68.
O.
0.
4.
O.
(ug/kg wet wt)
l
l
1
381
971
291
761
921
371
481
201
69 (
221
41 (
121
931
161
601
761
641
OOI
OOI
891
OOI
MIN
21.
74.
62.
38.
23.
30.
19.
49.
t.
16.
33.
1.
3.
11.
1.
1.
6.
9.
24.
1O.
10.
10.
10.
1
1
1
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
MAX
219.
98.
180.
199.
OOI 360.
OOI 684.
OOI 49.
OOI 132.
791 2060.
OOI 918.
OOI
791
201
701
OOI
OOI
901
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
001
249.
24.
13.
11.
19.
23.
6.
28.
230.
1O.
10.
30.
10.
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
— 1
OOI
— I
OOI
— 1
OOI
OOI
— 1
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
701
601
OOI
901
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-4. SUMMARY OF TOTAL PCBB BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
1
1
1
(All
IAre<
(Detection Frequency!
Puget Sound (All Specie*
!• I
INQ.
1
1
DET. 1
2221
X OET. 1 N I
1 1
8212721
SurMery
MEAN 1
1
102. 941
Beta
-------
tABLE 0-? SUMMARY OF ALPHA-HCH IV SAMPLE AREA AND Bttttifft
o
CO
00
(Detection Frequency!
INO
Art* (Specie* |
Alki Point ILlttleneck elamt
1 Butter clan I
IAU Species 1
Anacortee ISpecias I
IChinook salmon 1
IA11 Specie* I
Birch Bay IBpecles 1
ILlttleneck clMl
1 Butter clM 1
IA1) Specie* 1
Budd Inlet ISptcitt 1
lUlva 1
1.
(All Speciee 1
Bur ley Lagoon IBpecles 1
1 Butter cla« 1
IAU Species 1
Qu«rt«rMftt»r IBptci** I
ILittleneck cla«l
(Butter clM 1
(Manila claw 1
(All Bp»ci»» 1
>Comn«nc*««nt I8p«ci«* I
I IChinook talmon I
DET. 1
01
01
01
1
t
01
01
1
1
01
Ol
Ol
1
1
01
01
1
1
Ol
01
1
1
Ol
01
Ol
01
1
1
11
X DET. 1
1
•
. I
. 1
1
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
. I
1
1
. 1
. 1
1
1
. 1
. 1
1
1
. 1
. 1
. 1
1
sot
N 1
1
1
11
11
21
1
1
31
21
1
1
11
11
21
1
1
41
41
1
11
11
It
11
11
31
1
1
31
BuMNirv Data (U|/kg wit wt) 1
MEAN 1
1
1
0.091
O. O9I
0.091
1
1
O. 9OI
0. SOI
1
I
O. O9I
0.091
O. O9I
1
0. 901
0. 9OI
1
0.091
0.091
1
1
0.091
O. 091
O. O9I
0.091
1
1
O. 601
BTD 1
1
1
. 1
. 1
0.001
1
1
0.001
0. OOI
1
1
. 1
. 1
O. OOI
0. OOI
O. OOI
1
1
. 1
. 1
. 1
0.001
1
1
O. 671
HIN 1
t
1
0.091
O. O9I
0.091
1
1
0. 901
O. 9OI
1
1
0.091
0.091
O. 091
1
1
0. 9OI
0. 9OI
1
1
O. O9I
0.091
1
1
0.091
0. O9I
0.091
0.091
1
1
O. 9OI
MAX 1
1
1
0.091
O. 091
0.091
t
1
0. 901
O. 9OI
1
1
0. O9I
0.091
0.091
1
1
0. 901
O. 901
1
1
O. 091
0.091
1
t
0.091
0.031
0. 051
0.091
1
1
2. 001
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-7 SUMMARY OF ALPHA-HCH iY 8AMPUE AREA AND SPECIES
O
l
Co
vo
JDttffction Frtqutncvl
INQ. DET 1 X DET. 1
Art*
Coounfncemant
Bay
Oath Point
ISpeciat
ICoho ft«ltton
lUaminaria
INertocyttis
lUlva
1 mf,m,m,m — ltmf ,_, ,_,.. lmt ^
IA11 Species
(Specie*
1 _ — __
IBontnove claa
»
«
i
i
i
-i
i
ILlttlanack claal
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
IA11 Specie*
1
ISptcltt
1 ________ — ____
(Chinook salmon
(English sole
ILaninarla
INertocystis
lUlva
INori
1 _ lm mm tm mm ^, mm *m -fl . 1
(All Species
(Species
(Chinook salmon
I ml n • J 111 — 1 LJ 1111 III ••
lEnglivh col*
1
1
-1
1
.
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-1
1
1
tStarry flounder!
i . *
tDungtn*»i cr*b
IS and data
1
I
i
01
01
01
Ol
11
1
01
Ol
01
1
1
11
.
01
01
01
01
01
11
1
1
Ol
01
01
01
01
1
1
. 1
.
. 1
. 1
,
61
1
1
• 1
. 1
. 1
1
1
111
.1
. 1
. 1
. 1
11
1
1
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
Summary Data
N 1 MEAN 1
1
1
21
^
41
11
41
161
1
21
11
31
1
1
91
,
931
21
41
31
41
771
1
1
11
471
SI
121
1 1
1
1
0. 901
a
0. 901
0.901
O. 791
0.661
1
1
O. OBI
0.091
O. O7I
,
1
1. Ill
,
O. 991
0.901
O. 901
O. 901
0. 901
O. 921
1
1
0. 901
0.091
0.091
0. 031
0. 091
BTD
0.
O
O.
0.
O.
O.
1.
1.
0.
O.
O.
0.
1.
0.
0.
O.
(up/kg wet wt> 1
1
1
001
f
001
. 1
901
441
1
1
O4I
. 1
O3I
1
1
B3I
321
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
281
1
1
. 1
OOI
OOI
OOI
. 1
MIN
o
O
0
O
0
0
0
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
o.
o.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1
1
1
901
901
901
901
_^
901
1
1
091
091
091
1
1
901
.
901
9OI
901
901
9OI
901
1
1
901
091
091
O3I
051
— ,
MAX 1
1
1
0. 301
0. 301
— ___ _ |
0. 9OI
1. 9OI
2. OOI
1
1
O. 1OI
0. O9I
0. 1OI
1
1
6. OOI
• IB • f
9. OOI
0. 9OI
0. 9OI
0. 901
0. 301
6. 00 1
i
i
0. 301
0. 031
0. 031
O. OSI
O. OS!
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-7 SUMMARY OF ALPHA-HCH 0V SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIE?
o
S
(Detection Frequency 1
Area
Everett Harbor
Mukllteo
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
Point Pulley
(NO.
(Species 1
ILittleneck claal
IButter claa) 1
(Ulva 1
(All Specie* 1
(Bpecie* 1
ILittleneck claeil
IButter claa> 1
(All Specie* 1
(Species 1
(Chinook salnon 1
ILaalnarla 1
lUlva 1
INori 1
(All Species 1
(Species 1
ILittleneck clMl
IButter clan 1
(All Species 1
(Species 1
(English sole 1
1.
(All Specie* 1
DET. 1 X
1
01
01
01
Ol
1
1
01
01
Ol
1
81
01
01
01
01
21
1
Ot
01
01
1
01
01
DET. 1
1
1
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
1
1
. 1
. 1
. 1
1
1
891
. 1
. 1
-1
. 1
111
1
. 1
. 1
1
1
. 1
N 1
1
1
It
11
31
711
1
11
81
31
1
1
71
31
21
31
31
1BI
1
1
11
11
21
1
1
91
91
BUM
lary
MEAN 1
0.
0.
O.
O.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
O.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1
1
091
OBI
901
oai
1
1
091
091
O9I
1
1
361
901
SOI
SOI
901
631
1
1
O9I
091
091
1
1
901
901
Data
6TD
0.
O.
O.
O.
1.
O.
o.
a
0.
i.
0.
o.
0.
(ug/kg wet wtl 1
1
1
1
. 1
OOI
101
1
1
. 1
OOI
OOI
1
1
7OI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
101
1
1
. 1
. 1
OOI
1
1
OOI
OOI
HIM
0.
0.
O.
O.
0.
0.
o.
o.
o.
o.
o.
0.
o.
o.
0.
0.
o.
o.
1
1
091
091
901
091
1
1
O9I
091
O9I
1
1
901
901
901
9OI
901
901
1
1
091
091
091
1
1
901
sot
MAX 1
1
1
0.091
O. 091
O. 901
O. SOI
1
1
0.091
O. 091
O. O9I
1
1
9. OOI
0. 9OI
0. 901
0. 9OI
0. SOI
9.001
1
1
O. O9I
0.091
O. 091
I
1
0. 901
O. SOI
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-7. SUMMARY OF ALPHA-HCH BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
o
I
(Detection Frequency!
• .
1
INC. DET. 1 X
Aree, 1 Spec lei
Port Bu»«n (English vole
l&ung«n*«* crab
• ^— _— _ ,»_».._ _ _
IA11 Specie*
All Puget Bound (Specie*
AWAAA 1 •»•»_•«««__•. ..___
nrw m» i — ™~—™~—-~— —
IChinook talnon
I__«_ .«_
tCoho aatMon
lEnflliib sol*
1
1
1
1
1
-1
1
1
1 Starry f loundtrl
IDungentit crab
IBantnota claa
(Band clam
1
1
1
1
ILittUnack claml
1 Butter ciM
IMeniU cl««
ILavinaria
tNtrtocvvtit
(Ulva
INori
(All Specie*
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
01
01
01
1
1
41
01
01
01
01
01
01
Ol
Ol
01
Ol
01
01
Ol
41
DET I
1
1
. 1
. 1
1
1
171
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
. 1
BuMMry Date
N 1 MEAN 1 BTD
1
1
91
11
61
1
1
841
21
1131
51
131
21
11
71
81
11
91
71
171
71
212191
0.
0.
0.
1.
O.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o.
o.
o.
0.
0.
o.
0.
0.
o.
1
1
091
091
091
1
1
041
901
931
091
091
OBI
091
051
O5I
091
9OI
501
961
501
501
0.
0.
1.
0.
1.
O.
0.
O.
O.
O.
O.
O.
0.
0.
o.
(ug/kg wet wt>
1
1
1
001
. 1
001
1
1
441
001
031
001
001
O4I
. 1
001
OOI
. 1
001
OOI
241
OOI
921
MIN
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
O.
0.
0.
O.
O.
O.
O.
0.
0.
0.
O.
0.
1
1 MAX 1
1
1
091
O9I
051
1
1
9OI
501
091
051
OS I
051
051
051
O5I
051
501
SOI
SOI
501
051
1
1
0. 051
0. 051
0. OSI
1
1
6. OOI
0. SOI
9.001
0.051
0. OSI
0. 1OI
O. 051
0. OSI
0. OSI
0. OSI
0. SOI
0. 901
1. SOI
0. SOI
6. OOI
-------
TAILf 0-8 SUMMARY OF TOTAL DDT IV SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
IDotoction Frtqutncyl
(NO. DET. 1 X DET. 1
Arc* IBpoctot 1
Alkt Point ILittlonock cla*l
(Butter cla« 1
(All Bpoclo* 1
Anacortoo IBp«cio« 1
1 Chinook «al«on 1
(All Bpociot 1
Birch Bay IBpocioo 1
ILittlonock cla«l
IButtor claa 1
(All Spocia* 1
Budd Inlot IBpociot 1
lUlva 1
(All Bpociot 1
Burloy Lagoon IBpocioo 1
IBottor claoi 1
(All Bpoclo* 1
Ouartoraaotor IBptciot 1
Hor b or « 1
ILittlonock claa>l
IButtor cl«« 1
IHanila cla« 1
(All Bpocloc 1
ICo«mtnc»««nt IBpociot I
1 (Chinook i«l*on >
1
1
01
11
it
1
1
at
at
»
tl
01
11
1
41
41
1
1
11
11
1
1
01
11
It
at
i
i
41
i
iOOl
901
1
1
IOOl
IOOl
1
1001
. 1
901
1
1001
IOOl
1
1
1001
1001
I
t
IOOl
1001
671
1
1
801
N 1
1
11
11
at
1
21
at
1
1
11
11
at
41
41
1
11
11
1
1
11
11
11
31
t
1
91
BuMarg
MEAN 1
t
t
O. 191
O. 981
0. 941
1
7. SOI
7.901
1
1
0.891
0.191
o. aat
i
4.001
4. OOI
1
1
0. 331
0.381
1
1
0. 191
O. 961
0. 491
0.391
1
1
38. 4OI
Data (uf/k| wot wt)
1
BTD 1 HIN 1 MAX 1
1
. 1
0.941
1
1
3. 941
3. 941
t
. 1
. 1
O. 1OI
1
0.001
0. OOI
1
1
1
. 1
. 1
. 1
0.811
1
1
30.791
»
1
O. 191
0.981
0. 191
1
1
9. OOI
9. OOI
t
1
0.891
0. 191
0. 191
1
4.001
4. OOI
1
1
0.381
0.321
1
1
0. 191
0.961
0.491
0. 191
1
1
1. OOI
1
1
0. 191
0. 981
0.931
1
1
10. OOI
10. OOI
1
1
0.891
0. 191
0. 891
1
1
4. OOI
4. OOI
1
1
0.381
0.381
1
1
0. 191
_ mm -_— . t
0. 96 (
0. 491
0. 961
1
1
69. OOI
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE 0-8. SUMMARY QF TOTAL. DDT BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
O
I
IDttftction Fr»i
Area
Commonc««ont
n ...
Da>h Point
Elliott Bay
INO.
ISptcii* t
ICaho tal«on 1
IPaclflc h-k« 1
In +
IRockfl-h t
IWalloyo pollock!
(_______ta _________ A
IToMcod 1
1 Starry f loundor t
ILaftinari.- 1
INertocyitlt t
lUlva 1
i .
(All Bp«ci«* t
IBpaclt* 1
1 _______________ |
IB«ntnott cl«« 1
ILittltnack clMl
(All Bpaci.v t
I8paci«- 1
1 _______________ |
1 Chinook ••Imon 1
(Pacific h«k« 1
IRockfifth t
I English t»oU 1
(Rock .ol* 1
IM.rk*t till) id 1
ILaninaria 1
lu.ncyl
DET. 1 X OET. 1
1
21
11
41
11
01
41
41
11
41
291
1
1
21
01
21
1
1
91
21
11
11
41
31
21
41
1001
1001
10OI
901
• 1
1001
1OOI
loot
1001
891
1
1
1001
. 1
671
,
I
1OOI
1OOI
331
21
1001
1OOI
10OI
1001
Summary Oat*
N 1
21
It
41
21
It
41
41
It
41
281
1
1
21
11
31
1
1
91
21
31
991
41
31
21
41
MEAN 1
1
47. 9OI
14.361
3. Ill
2.211
1. 191
9.021
4. OOI
4. OOI
4.901
.
13.481
1
I
0.961
O. 191
0.421
t
1
27. 22 1
8. 971
1.781
19.331
9. 191
9. 611
4. OOI
3. 791
8TP 1
1
44. 99 1
. 1
0. 301
1. 901
• 1
3.071
O. OOI
. 1
1.731
22.091
1
1
0.421
. 1
O. 381
1
1
23.861
O. 231
1. 101
96. 61 1
4. O7I
9. Oil
0. 001
0. 901
HIN 1
1
16.001
14.361
2.721
1. 191
1. 191
2. OOI
4.001
4. OOI
3.001
t
1.001
1
1
0.261
O. 191
0. 191
1
1
8. OOI
8. SOI
1. 191
6. OOI
1. 941
2. OOI
4. OOI
3. OOI
MAX
79. OOI
14. 361
3. 461
3.271
1. 191
9. 131
4. OOI
4. OOI
7.001
->•_.!
79. OOI
1
1
0. 891
0. 191
0.891
1
1
68. 00 1
9. 131
3. O9I
419. OOI
11. 141
1 1 33 1
4. 00 1
4. 00!
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-8. SUMMARY OF TOTAL DOT BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
o
I
•tk
IDotoction Frtqutncyl Buaaary
INO. OET. 1 X OET. 1
Area
Elliott Bay
Everett Harbor
Mukllteo
Point No Point
(Specie* |
(Ulva |
INori |
(All Spade* I
(Specie* |
ICkinaok tmlmttn 1
IEn|lith sol* 1
(Starry flounder 1
IDunf •!)••• crak 1
(Band claa 1
ILittlanack claa 1
IButter cl«a> 1
(Ulva 1
(All Special 1
IBpaclat 1
I ~*«W««WM I
ILittlanack claal
IButtar cla« 1
(All Specie* 1
(Specie* 1
(Chinook talaon 1
IL«»in«ri« 1
lUlva 1
INori 1
i
i
31
41
331
11
01
01
01
Ol
11
11
31
61
1
1
Ol
01
Ol
1
1
71
31
21
31
31
1
1
1001
1001
371
1
1
1001
. 1
•IMP ••*•«»*• ^1 <••
. 1
1OOI
10OI
1001
81
1
. 1
. 1
1001
1001
1001
1001
1OOI
N 1
1
1
31
41
891
~+-
1
1
11
491
-..+-.
91
121
11
11
11
31
731
1
1
11
21
31
1
1
71
31
21
31
31
MEAN 1
4
3
19
30
0
0
0
0
0
O
4
1
O
0
O
28
4
3
4
4
1
.001
.791
—+_
.941
1
1
.001
.891
.891
_»+_
.891
. 191
. 901
.291
.331
.371
1
1
. 191
. 191
. 191
1
1
.361
. OOI
.901
.001
.OOI
Data
8TO
0.
0.
49.
O.
0.
O.
O.
3.
0.
O.
21.
O.
0.
O.
0.
1
1
1
1
OOI
.--+.
9OI
991
1
1
. 1
OOI
OOI
•^^^«
OOI
. 1
. 1
. 1
981
471
. 1
OOI
OOI
901
OOI
711
OOI
OOI
MIN
4.
3.
I.
3O.
O.
O.
O.
0.
0.
0.
4.
O.
O.
0.
0.
4.
4.
3.
4.
4.
1
1
OOI
OOI
— +_
191
— +-
1
1
OOI
891
891
--#-
891
191
901
291
OOI
191
1
1
191
191
191
1
1
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
MAX 1
1
1
4. OOI
4. OOI
•«• »••••—•*» 1
419.001
1
1
30. OOI
O. 891
O. 891
MMIBMMMM 1
0.891
0. 191
0.901
O. 251
9. OOI
30. OOI
1
1
0. 191
0. 191
0. 191
1
1
93. OOI
4. OOI
4. OOI
4. OOI
4. OOI
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE D-B SUMMARY OF TOTAL DDT BY SAMPLE AREA AND SPECIES
0
I
IDatftction Fr«<
i
Area
Point No Point
Sinclair Inlet
(All Species
I
(NO.
IBtarrtj floundtrt
1 ___ »
(Llttleneck clan!
Point Pulleu
Port Susan
Edmonds
Agate Pass
(Butter cla«
*
(Market squid
1 i •
(All Species
(Species
(English sole
(All Species
(Species
(English sole
IDung«n»»» crab
(All Species
(Species
(Pacific hake
IRockf Ish
(Rock sole
1 Market tquid
(All Species
(Species
(Rockfish
i l_
(Pacific cod
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
-1
1
1
1
-1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
luencul BuMary Data (ug/kg wet wt) 1
DET. 1 X DET. 1 N 1 MEAN 1
1
1
181
1
91
11
11
21
91
1
1
01
01
(
01
01
01
1
11
91
41
21
121
1
1
2!
11
1 1
1 (
10O) 181
1 1
1 1
1001 91
1001 It
10OI 11
1001 21
1OOI 91
1 1
1 1
. 1 91
. 1 91
1 I
1 1
. 1 91
. I 11
. I 61
1 I
1 1
1OOI 11
1OOI 91
1001 41
1001 21
1OOI 121
1 1
1 1
67 1 3!
1001 11
1
13. 421
1
10.391
1. 161
1.621
4. 18t
7. OK
1
1
6.001
6. OOI
1
1
0.891
O. 891
0.891
1
1
3.291
4. 1OI
3. 191
4.061
3.711
1
I
9.271
16.411
8TD 1
1
1
17.881
(
6. 191
. 1
1.321
6.041
1
1
O. OOI
O. OOI
1
0. OOI
.1
O. OOI
1
1
. 1
1.291
0. 811
0.991
1.021
!
1
3. 891
. t
MIN I
1
I
3. OOI
1
1
3.71!
1. 161
1. 621
3.29!
1. 161
1
I
6.001
6. OOI
1
1
0.891
O. 891
O. 891
1
1
3.291
3.211
1.971
3.691
1.971
1
I
1. 131
16. 41 i
MAX I
1
1
93. OO 1
1
1
18. 191
1. 161
1. 621
9. 11!
18. 191
1
1
6. OO!
6. OOI
1
1
0.89!
O. 891
O. 891
!
1
3. 291
6.231
3. 791
4. 481
6. 23!
1
1
8. 78!
16. 41 ,'
(CONTINUED)
-------
TA1LE 0-B. SUMMARY OF TOTAL DOT §V SAMPLE AREA AND 8PECIE8
O
IDataction Fraquancyl Bua*ar« Oat* (ug/kg w«t wt> 1
Art*
Agate Pan
INO
(All 8pacla»
1
Point Mad It on IBpaciaa
Manchattar
IBablafith
IWallaya aollockl
IToaicod 1
(All Bpacia* 1
ISpaciaa 1
Iftockfish 1
(Pacific cod 1
IA11 Bpaclai 1
Point Jaf faraonlBpaciaa 1
(Pacific haka 1
All Pugat
Araaa
(Pacific cod 1
(All Bpaciat 1
Bound I8p«ci«t I
(Chinook •«l*on 1
1C oho ft«l«on I
(Pacific haka 1
Iftockfiafc 1
IBablafith I
(Pacific cod I
(Wallaya pollockl
IToncod 1
D£T IX DET 1 N t HEAN I BID 1 NSN I
i
i
31
1
1
at
91
31
101
1
1
11
41
91
1
1
41
11
91
1
231
21
81
131
21
61
61
31
791 4
1
1001 SI
1001 91
10OI 31
1001 101
1 1
1 1
1001 11
1001 41
1001 91
1 (
1 1
1001 41
1001 11
1
1
B. 061
1
1
14. 101
3.461
6.991
6.321
1
1
6.941
10.861
10. OBI
1
1
4.091
17.441
1001 91 6. 731
1 1 1
1 1 (
961 241 28.351
1001 21
1001 Bl
BH 161
1001 21
1001 61
861 71
791 41
47.901
6.471
3. B2I
14. 101
12. BBI
3. 101
9. 201
6. 4O
1.341
1.681
4.641
4.981
1.811
2.391
1
1
O. 681
. 1
6.021
1
1
23.421
44. 99 1
3.961
2. 161
1.341
3.491
1.621
4.691
1. 191
1
1
13. 191
1.831
1.961
1.631
1
1
6.941
9.041
4.941
1
3.301
17. 441
3.301
1
1
1.OOI
16. OO!
3.291
1. 191
13. 191
9.041
1. 191
1. 191
1
MAX 1
1
1
1
16.411
1
1
1
19.041
1
9. 971
1 1 . 23 1
19.041
1
1
6. 941
13. 101
13. 101
I
1
4.741
17. 441
17. 441
1
1
69. OO 1
79.001
14.361
8.781
19.041
17. 441
9. 971
11231
(CONTINUED)
-------
TABLE 0-8. SUMMARY OF TOTAL. DOT BY SAMPLE AREA AND BPECIE8
(Detection Frequency! BUM
All Puget BoundlBpeciee
(English sola
1 ________ __ _ _
INO
1
1
(Starry f loundtr 1
(Dock sola
(Dunganass crab
IBentnoie claei
(Band claet
I__
1
1
1
ILittlanack claait
Ituttar claai
1 ._._,__________,___.
(Manila claai
(Market tquld
ILaalnarla
INereocyitis
lUlva
INori
IA11 Specie*
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
DET. 1 X OET. 1
1
1
11
91
81
01
21
01
31
91
11
71
91
71
171
71
1391
tary Data
N 1 MEAN 1
1 1
1 1
111141
641
1001
1001
431
631
10OI
1001
1001
1001
1001
1001
141
81
131
21
11
71
81
11
71
91
71
171
71
9.
9.
4.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
4.
4.
3.
4.
3.
4912841 8.
1
1
991
491
171
891
961
191
361
921
491
761
OOI
711
181
861
791
BTO
40.
9.
2.
0.
O.
O.
0.
3.
0.
0.
O.
O.
27.
(ug/kg wet wt)
1
1
1
181
621
931
OOI
421
. 1
371
921
.1
061
OOI
491
Bit
381
941
MIN
0.
O.
1.
0.
0.
0.
O.
0.
0.
2.
4.
3.
3.
3.
O.
1
1
1
891
891
941
891
261
191
191
191
491
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
OOI
191
MAX
419. OOI
18. 191
11. 141
0.891
0.891
0. 191
1. 161
1.621
«...»*--. 1
0.491
11. 331
4. OOI
4. OOI
7.001
4.001
419. OOI
-------
APPENDIX E
CONCENTRATIONS OF CHEMICALS OF CONCERN IN FISH AND SHELLFISH
FROM LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF PUGET SOUND
-------
TABLE E-l. BIOACCUMULAT10N DATA FOR CARCINOGENIC CHEMICALS OF CONCERN IN TARGET SPECIES FROM LOCATIONS OUTSIDE OF PUGET SOUND
Seafood Mean
Chemical Category Species , Comnon Name Region Location (ug/kg wet]
Arsenic Shellfish Arctica islandica Ocean quahog Mid-Atlantic coast 2,995.0
Cancer irroratus Rock Crab Delaware Dunns ite 1.900.0
MY.£1 US £3
1vti']j$ ca'
JlXtl HS S3.
M^trus £2
Mvtl us ga
M,ytf yj caj
ij:ornianus California mussel California Bodega Head 1.573.0
i 'ornlanus California mussel California Crescent Citv 2.850.0
1 'ornlanus California mussel California Oceanside 1.100.0
i 'ornianus California mussel California Royal Palms 1.700.0
1 'ornlanus California mussel California Tomales Bay 1.400.0
i 'ornlanus California mussel California Trinidad Head 1,700.0
Mvtllus edulls Edible mussel California Pt. Loma 1,400.0
Solsula solidlssima Surf clam Mid-Atlantic coast 2,098.0
Carcino- Fish Pseudooleuronectes amehcanus Winter flounder New York Raritan Bay 2.S?'
genie PAH Pseudopleuronectes aroericanus Winter flounder New York Bight 1.9a*
m Shellfish Arctica Islandica Ocean auahoa Massachusetts Buzzards Bay 0.5°
1 Arctica Is
Arctica 1s
Arct £§. 12
Arctica 1s
Arctica 1s
Arctica l£
augjca Ocean quahoa Massachusetts Georges Bank 0.5"
ancjca Ocean quahoq New Jersey Shelf 0.7
ancjcg Ocean quahog New York Long Island shelf 1.6
aiijjica Ocean quahoq Nova Scotia Shelf 1-0
and(c« Ocean quahoa Rhode Island Shelf 0.5^
andlca Ocean quahog Rhode Island-Massachusetts Shelf 1-2 .
£sn£e.E irxaraiiia Rock crab New York Bight . Ambrose area 3-°a'b
lancer Irroratus Rock crab New York Bight 3'6a'b
Hcfarus, ajngrlcapug American lobster Mid-Atlantic Bight Wilmington Canyon 2-5a'h
HaifflrMS 2n£dCaaUS American lobster New York Raritan Bay Z-1a"b
tanarus flmerlCanUS American lobster New York Bight Ambrose area 4-z-,'h
Homarus americanus American lobster New York Bight Shelf break 6.4^'"
Homarua fiQlBri£aiUl§ American lobster New York Bight Tom s Canyon 2.2 •
Mercenarla mercenarla Hardshell clam Rhode Island Narragansett Bay O.ZU
'Hi arenar
vti us ca'
HYtVus &4i
5pj?!j' a so
Soisu i so
Soisu { so
Selsu a SQ
Soisu i so'
.a. Softshell clam Oregon Coos Bay ib.B
iffifBianUS California mussel Washington Freshwater Bay 12. 8a
1 j$ Edible mussel Oregon Yaquina Bay lbb-3a h
Idissima Surf clam Maryland Ocean City 8.4^- "
JJlSsilM Surf clam New Jersey Barnegat 3'Vh
^clssjma Surf clam New Jersey Shark River Inlet z-bih
ulsslma Surf clam New York Atlantic Beach 4.9a'B
iclssima Surf clam New York Rockaway Beach 3./_ u
Solsula solldissima Surf clam New York Bight ^'Tb
Spisula solidisslma Surf clam Virginia Chincoteague 3.2-
-------
TABLE E-l. (Continued)
Chemical
Seafood
Category
Species
Cannon Name
Region
Location
Mean
(ug/kg wet)
PCS F1 sh Leiostomus xanthurus
Lelost onus xanthurus
HIcrostomus oaclficua
fllcrostofnua oaclf
Mlcrostomus paclf
cus
£113
Hlcrostqmus paclficus
HI crostomus oaclficus
crostomus oactficus
crostomus paclftci)a
atlchl
Pseudoo
Pseudoo
Pseudoo
Pseudop
Pseudoo
hvs stellatus
euronectes americanus
euronectes amer
euronectes amer
euronectes amer
euronectes amer
canus
.canus
canus
canus
Spot
Spot
Dover sole
Dover sole
Dover sole
Dover sole
Dover sole
Dover sole
Dover sole
Starry flounder
Winter flounder
Winter flounder
Winter flounder
Winter flounder
Winter flounder
New Jersey
New Jersey
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
Washington
New Jersey
New Jersey
New York
New York
New York Bight
Cape May 30.0
Sandy Hook 240.0
Dana Point 19.6
Newport Beach 650.0
Palos Verdes Shelf 1150.0
Point Hueneme 80.0
Point Lcma 200.0
Santa Catalina Island 45.0
Santa Monica Bay 1750.0
McCalister Creek 30.8
Great Bay 48.9
Sandy Hook 70.0
Apex dump 108.0
Raritan Bay 99.3
75.0
i
ro
Shellfish A,rcy
Axfij
Arcl
1
j
i
!
!
!
;
;
,
!
anqi
iflcj
tomfi
2001
SBBI
BEDU
amai
2fl|aj
Bfflaj
tomat
•tomai
tomai
M11
Mi
Mi
Mi
ML
Mi
Mi
Mi
60 1
CO 1
59
GO
l£iDlt
£ 1rr<
£ Irn
•us ami
onf
on
oro
OfK
OIK
ant
]£j Ocean quahog Massachusetts Buzzards Bay 20.1
tcj Ocean quahog New Jersey Shelf 9.6
lea Ocean auahoa New York Long Island shelf 15.6
iqa Ocean quahog Nova Scotia Shelf 3.1
IM Ocean guahoa Rhode Island Shelf 13.3
lea Ocean quahog Rhode Island - Massachusetts Shelf 10.2
cnvi Yellow crab California Palos Verdes shelf 190.0
ratut Rock crab New York Bight Ambrose 50.0
iratus Rock crab New York Bight 37.2
ri canus American lobster Maine Casco Bay 36.7
•us americanus American lobster Mid-Atlantic Bight Wilmington Canyon 20.0
IIU americanus American lobster New York Long Island Sound 78.4
•us americanus American lobster New York New York Harbor 233.0
1U2 americanus American lobster New York Raritan Bay 220.0
342 americanus American lobster New York Bight Ambrose 40.0
•us americanus American lobster New York Bight Dredge disposal site 15.6
•us amer 1 canus American lobster New York Bight New Jersey coast 147.7
"US americanus American lobster New York Bight Shelf break 33.3
•us ame
jia ]
;a
us ca
JJS £&
lus \
HS \
lus
Lua
,US J
rfl
?fl
;a
ii
.ricanus American lobster New York Bight Ton's Canyon 10.5
fornlanus California mussel California Ano Neuvo 62.0
Ifornianus California mussel California Avila Beach 52'°h
ifornianus California mussel California Bodega Head 0-9
IfprDtdnuS California mussel California Crescent City 3.6
1 forni anus California mussel California Diablo Point 9.4
JforjQlaoys California mussel California Glass Beach 9.1
Ifornianus Cal ifornia mussel California Intake Cove 14.0
sal Ifornianus California mussel California JP Burns 0.9"
-------
TABLE E-l. (Continued)
Seafood
Chemical Category Species
Mvtil
ML
Mvtl
Mvtl
Mvti
Mvti
MM1
MU
Myt 1
Mvtil
Mvtl
Ml
Hvtl
HvtV
Wl
Mvtl
Mvti
n ML
Myfc
0 Mvti
M
Hvtl
Mvtl
Ml
Hvtl
Mvtl
Sols
Sols
§BlS
Sols
Sels
Sols
Spis
DDT Fish Micr
Micr
Mice
Micr
Micr
Micr
Micr
Plat
Psei
Psei
Psei
Psei
y? californianus
us ca i forni a,py§
M§ 99 Ifornianus
j{§ £& Ifornianus
us ca ij'ornianus
us ca i orpi^nuj
jj3 $a_ jj'ornlanus
us cii'ornlanus
us £4 j^ornlanus
us 54 brn anus
us ca orn a.nys
us ca Ifornianus
us fidu i§
MSfiMli
us edulls
il£ edulls
us edulls
U2 edulls
us edu Is
iU edulis
us edu Is
U2 edulis
us edu Is
US edulls
US edu Is
LJS. fidj±LLS
ula so dlssima
H 9 Sfi hlSS ma
y £ 22 t{ JSS ma
uja so jjissima
u & S3. i£ Isslina
y 1 S5> ((issima
M a SP i
-------
TABLE E-l. (Continued)
Seafood
Chemical Category Species
Shellfish Cancer irroratus
Cancer trroratus,
Hpjaarus americanus
Hsu
Ikma.
rus amei
rus amei
Homarus amei
Homarus amei
i&M.
km
Homa
Hem
Mvti
lyl
Hvt
My;
Mi
l£i
Tl Mi
' Mvti
Mi
tttfl
Mvli
lYtl
ivt
Hvt
M
HYt>
M
Mi
Bvt
ML
Hvt
Mvti
(Ml
Mvti
Mi
Sols
?p1?
Seis
Ids
Ids
ids
rus ame
CUiajnfti
rus amei
rus amei
Ui£4
Uifi4
112 £1 J
Ui £4
112 £& J
Ui £4
Ui £&
US CA
Iii £4
111 £4 j
Ui £fl
Ui £4
112 £4
Ui £4 j
Ui £4
Ui C4
UifidU
uisdu
us ecu
uifidu.
us edu
Uasdu.
ua edu
Ui edu
us edu
UI S2..
UI 12.
U4 so_
U4 i£L
M1£P..
Ml 52.
ula so
• canus
" £ADUS
ricanus
' c&nus
• canus
ricanus
• canus
r canus
orn aj)U8
orn Anus
L brn anus
orn anus
|_ brn i anus
brn 1 anus
brn 1 anus
Brolanus
orn anus
[brn anus
| brn 1 anus
brn i anus
brn 1 anus
prnjapus
L brn i anus
prnlanus
ii
is
Lia
Ji
ii
LLS
ii
ii
Iii
(1s.s.iVTI3
(issiisa
Ijissima
Usiiss
jj jggjmj
tcissim^
idksjM
Coimion Name
Rock crab
Rock crab
American lobster
American lobster
American lobster
American lobster
American lobster
American lobster
American lobster
American lobster
American lobster
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
California mussel
Edible mussel
Edible mussel
Edible mussel
Edible mussel
Edible mussel
Edible mussel
Edible mussel
Edible mussel
Edible mussel
Edible mussel
Surf clam
Surf clam
Surf clam
Surf clam
Surf clam
Surf clam
Surf clam
Region
New York Bight
New York Bight
Mid-Atlantic Bight
New York
New York
New York
New York Bight
New York Bight
New York Bight
New York Bight
New York Bight
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
Cal i forni a
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
California
Naryl and
New Jersey
New Jersey
New York
New York
New York Bight
Virginia
Location
Ambrose
Wilmington Canyon
Long Island Sound
New York Harbor
Raritan Bay
Ambrose
Dredge disposal site
New Jersey site
Shelf break
Tom's Canyon
Ano Nuevo
Avila Beach
Bodega Head
Crescent City
Diablo Point
Intake Cove
JP Burns
Los Angeles
Montana de Oro
Oceans ide
Pacific Grove
Pecho Rock
Point Lena
Royal Palms
Soberanes Point
Trinidad Head
Alameda Bay
Anaheim
Channel Islands
Elkhorn
Elkhorn Slough
Los Angeles
Marina del Rey
Newport Bay Island
Port Hueneme
Tomales Bay
Ocean City
Barnegat
Shark River Inlet
Atlantic Beach
Rockaway Beach
Chincoteague
Mean
(ug/kg wet)
4.0
8.0
25 '°i!
25. Ob
10.9
0.3.
25. Ob
25. Ob
12.4
2.4
92.0
9.4
4.1
3.9
6.0
6.3
4.5
233.4
6.1
49.6
8.0
11.5
21.5
272.2
5.1
1.8
163.2
315.0
81.0
888.0
179.0
202.9
104.0
887.2
128.0
5.4
4.1
6.0
2.5
3.0
2.7
0.5
0.2
-------
TABLE E-l. (Continued)
Seafood
Chemical Category Species
alpha-HCH Shellfish HytjJMS cajiforniaryu!?
Hflilu^ californianus
MrfUys californianus
Myti us eg
t&ti \ys 62
Hvtlli^ edu
------- |