PB80-224082
Gasohol, TEA (Tertiary Butyl Alcohol)
MTBE (Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether)
Effects on Light-Duty Emissions
Southwest Research Inst.
San Antonio, TX
Prepared for
Environmental Protection Agency
Ann Arbor, HI
Oct 79
U.S. bptrtroeat of GKBRKCC
Mttiooal Technical Information Service
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please reeJ luslmctiont on the ret trie before completing)
l. REPORT NO.
EPA-460/3-79-012
2.
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSIO^NO.
""C 224082
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Gasohol, TEA, MTBE Effects on Light-
Duty Emissions
5. REPORT DATE
October 1979
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
Bruce B. Bykowski
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Southwest Research Institute
6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
68-03-2377
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Emission Control Technology Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
Final
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTC
16. ABSTRACT
This report describes the laboratory testing of unleaded gasoline and gasoline
mixtures containing ethanol, tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), and methyl tertiary butyl
ether (MTBE). Four different vehicles were employed in this study. Analytical
procedures for the measurement of TBA and ethanol in exhaust and evaporative
emissions were developed. Regulated and several unregulated emission rates were
determined during the entire Federal Test Procedures (FTP.) for each vehicle using
several gasolines. The exahust emission rates of hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide
(CO), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), individual hydrocarbons (IHC), and aldehydes are
reported in grams per kilometer. Evaporative emissions for total hydrocarbons, TBA,
and ethanol are reported in grams.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
COSATI l-'icld/Gtoup
Tests
Automobiles
Exhaust gases
Exhaust emissions
Gasoline
Automotive fuels
Ethanols
Alcohols
Gasohol
Ethanol
Fuels
13. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release unlimited
19. SECURITY CLASS (TliisReport)
_Uric.Las,sJ.fi&d_
20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
Unclassified
21. NO. OF PAGES
JASL
22.Prtl
EPA Form 2220-1 (9-73)
-------
EPA 460/3-79-012
GASOHOL, TBA, MTBE EFFECTS ON
LIGHT-DUTY EMISSIONS
by
Bruce B. Bykowski
Southwest Research Institute
San Antonio, Texas
FINAL REPORT
of
Task No. 6
Contract 63-03-2377
for
Environmental Protection Agency
Emission Control Technology Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
October 1979
•S
?:'
I
SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
SAN ANTONIO HOUSTON
NATIONAL TECHNICAL
INFORMATION SERVICE
am
-------
SOUTHWEST RESEARCH INSTITUTE
Post Office Drawer 28510, 6220 Culebra Road
San Antonio, Texas 78284
GASOHOL, TBA, MTBE EFFECTS ON
LIGHT-DUTY EMISSIONS
by
Bruce B. Bykowski
Southwest Research Institute
San Antonio, Texas
FINAL REPORT
of
Task No. 6
Contract 68-03-2377
for
Environmental Protection Agency
Emission Control Technology Division
2565 Plymouth Road
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105
October 1979
Approved:
/:
Karl J, Springer, director
-------
ABSTRACT
This report describes the laboratory testing of unleaded gasoline and
gasoline mixtures containing ethanol, tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA), and
methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). Four different vehicles were employed
in this study. Analytical procedures for the measurement of TBA and ethanol
in exhaust and evaporative emissions were developed. Regulated and several
unregulated emission rates were determined during the entire Federal Test
Procedures (FTP) for each vehicle using several gasolines. The exhaust
emission rates of hydrocarbons, (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), oxides of
nitrogen (NOX), individual hydrocarbons (IHC), and aldehydes are reported
in grams per kilometer. Evaporative emissions for total hydrocarbons, TBA,
and ethanol are reported in grams.
-------
FOREWORD
This project was conducted for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
by the Department oij Emissions Research of Southwest Research Institute.
The laboratory test.ing phase of the project began in October 1973 and was
completed in June 1979. This project was conducted under EPA Contract No.
68-03-2377, Task 6 and was identified within Southwest Research Institute
as Project 11-4493-001. The EPA Task Officer was Mr. Robert J. Garbe of
the Emission Control Technology Division, Environmental Protection Agency,
2565 Plymouth Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan. The Southwest Research Institute
Project Manager was Mr. Karl J. Springer. The project leaders were
Bruce B. Bykowski and Harry E. Dietzmann.
111
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
ABSTRACT ii
FOREWORD iii
LIST OF FIGURES v
LIST OF TABLES vi
I. SUMMARY l'
II. INTRODUCTION 2
A. Objective 2
B. Approach 2
C. Scope 2
III. PREPARATIONS AND PROCEDURES 3
A. Description of Vehicles 3
B. Description of Fuels 3
C. Test Procedures 6
D. Test Plan 7
E. Installation Photographs 7
IV. RESULTS 16
A. 1978 Malibu 16
B. Mustang 18
C. Saab 22
D. Marquis • 24
E. Discussion of Results 28
REFERENCES 31
APPENDICES
A. Analytical Procedure for the Measurement of Tertiary
Butyl Alcohol in Exhuast and SHED Evaporative Emissions
B. Analytical Procedure for the Measurement of Ethyl Alcohol
in Exhaust and SHED Evaporative Emissions
C. Malibu FTP Results for Regulated and Unregulated
Emissions with Seven Test Fuels
D. Mustang FTP Results for Regulated and Unregulated
Emissions with Seven Test Fuels
E. Saab FTP Results for Regulated and Unregulated
Emissions with Five Test Fuels
F. Marquis FTP Results for Regulated and Unregulated
Emissions with Three Test Fuels
-------
LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Typical Test Sequence 13
Vehicle Being Placed In Evaporative Emission
Enclosure 14
3 Vehicles Being Tested In Evaporative Emission
Enclosure and On Dynamometer 15
4 Malibu FTP and Evaporacive Emissions 17
5 Mustang Total FTP Emissions 20
6 Saab FTP and Evaporative Emissions 23
7 Marquis FTP and Evaporative Emissions 26
8 Carbon Monoxide Emission Rate Summary For All Types
of Test Fuels 29
9 Hydrocarbon Evaporative Emission Summary For All
Types of Test Fuels 30
-------
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Vehicle^ Description 4
2 Fuel Specifications 5
3 Experimental Test Plan 8
4 Test Schedule 10
5 Malibu Average Unregulated Emissions Results 19
6 Mustang Average Unregulated Emissions Results 21
7 Saab Average Unregulated Emissions Results 25
8 Marquis Average Unregulated Emissions Results 27
VI
-------
I. SUMMARY
The effect of ethanol, tertiary butyl alcohol (TEA) and methyl tertiary
butyl ether (MTBE) on exhaust and evaporative emissions was evaluated with
several base fuels. Four catalyst equipped vehicles were set to manufacturer
specifications and their fuel tanks modified with thermocouples and drain
plugs. The vehicles were tested with .several fuels in an evaporative emis-
sion enclosure and over the dynamometer portion of the Federal Test Procedure
(FTP). The vehicles included in the test plan were a 1978 Malibu, a 1978
Mustang, a 1978 Saab, and a 1979 Marquis.
During each test, a series of regulated and unregulated emission tests
were performed. Aldehydes, individual hydrocarbons, and the regulated emis-
sions were meausred on all FTP tests with all fuel blends. Ethanol and TEA
were measured in the exhaust and evaporative emissions for their respective
fuel blends.
In general, the Marquis and Saab did not exhibit an increase in evapo-
rative hydrocarbons, while the Mustang increased by a factor of three. The
Malibu evaporative emissions increased between 30 and 40 percent. The de-
sign of the evaporative emission system and location of the carburetor
in respect to engine heat probably caused the variations observed.
The CO exhaust emissions were reduced between 15 and 40 percent.
There was no significant change ir. the HC and NOX emissions between the
base fuel and the fuel mixtures. The aldehydes and individual hydrocarbons
in the exhaust remained relatively the same with the base fuel and fuel
blends. The exception was methane which was about 20 percent less with the
fuel blends. No significant quantities of ethanol or TEA was observed in
the exhaust. The catalyst efficiency is apparently sufficient to completely
oxidize any partially oxidized components {i.e., aldehydes, ethanol, TEA)
in the exhaust.
-------
II. INTRODUCTION
On June 14, 1976, Contract 68-03-2377 titled "Identification of
Emissions from Gasolines Derived from Coal and Oil Shale" was authorized
by the EPA Contracting Officer, Mr. Paul W. Quitter.
The original purpose of this project was to characterize gasoline which
may be available from coal processing or from oil shale stocks in the future,
and to determine exhaust emissions which are likely to result from the use
of such fuels. Probable fuel composition have been determined through data
on properties of stocks from coal and oil shale processing and a final report
concerning this study phase of the project was submitted in December 1976
titled "Impact of Coal and Oil Shale troducts of Gasoline Composition,
1976-2000, Task One, Final Report".
With the unavailability of liquids refined to gasoline from both shale
oil or coal, the laboratory investigation of fuel effects on various types
of gasoline burning engines was deferred. At the direction of th» EPA
Project Officer, the work efforts were redirected to assisting the EPA in
determining possible deleterious effects of alcohol-gasoline mixtures.
These efforts were specifically to establish the effect of the alcohol on
increased evaporative emissions. The laboratory efforts were begun in
October 1978 and were completed June 1979.
A. Objective
The objective of this project was to investigate the emission effects
of gasoline mixtures containing ethanol, tertiary butyl alcohol (TEA) and
methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) on several light-duty vehicles. In
addition to regulated emissions, a variety of unregulated gaseous emissions
were determined using the gasoline mixtures. Evaporative emissions were
also taken. These fuels are presently being considered as potential fuels
of the future.
B. Approach
'"he experimental approach was to prepare the vehicles and equipment to
perform both the evaporative enclosure portion and the dynamometer portion
of the Federal Test Procedure. The vehicles were then tested with previously
prepared gasolines containing the additives and compared to results generated
with the base gasoline.
C. Scope
A total of four vehicles were employed in this study along with eight
fuels. Initial testing used three vehicles and evaluated base fuels (Indolene,
unleaded) and base fuel mixtures containing ethanol. Final testing employed
two of the originally used vehicles in addition to a fourth vehicle. The
final testing evaluated base fuels and base fuels containing TBA and MTBE.
A total of 86 gaseous and evaporative tests were performed during this investi-
gation. Replicate tests were conducted with each test fuel to establish test
and vehicle repeatability.
2
-------
III. PREPARATIONS AND PROCEDURES
This section describes the preparations, vehicles and equipment, fuels;,
test procedures, anc' test plan employed.
i
A. Description of Vehicles
Three vehicles were originally chosen by the Project Officer to be used.
A 1978 Chevrolet Malibu and a 1978 Ford Mustang II were leased from a lo.al
Ipasing firm. A 1978 Saab 99 was loaned from the manufacturer to the EPA.
These vehicles were previously used during other EPA research efforts
at SwRI and were available for use at the initiation of the project. Due
to the priorities of other EPA projects, the Saab was only used for a part
of the study and a 1979 Mercury Marquis was substituted to complete the
investigation. The Marquis was also leased from a local leasing firm. The
description of these vehicles are listed in Table 1. All the /ehicles
were adjusted *-.o manufacturer specifications.
B. Description of Fuels
The various fuels tested used base fuels that meet the gasoline fuel
specifications listed in the Federal Registerd)*. >£he eight fuels evaluated
in the research effort arp summarized below and the specifications listed in
Table 2.
Fuel Code Description
A EM-373-F ASTM unleaded gasoline, EPA No. 3
B EM-374-F ASTM unleaded gasoline + 10% ethanol (mixedlt EPA No. 4
C EM-375-F ASTM summer cjrade unleaded gasoline +10% ethanol 'Mended),
EPA No. 6
D EM-371-F Indolene, EEE clear
E EM-372-F Indolene +10% ethanol, EEE gasohol
F EM-389-F Indolene, EEE clear
-------
TABLE 1. VEHICLE DESCRIPTION
Vehicle Make
Year
Model
Body Type
Serial Number
GVMR, kg(lb)
Engine Displacement,
Utuji.no Family
Emission Controls
Catalysts
Air Pump
EGR
Chassis Dyanmometer Settings
Inertia, kg (Ibs)
Power, kW(hp)
Chevrolet
1978
'Malibu
2-dr
1W27U8Z434207
2052 (4523)
5.00 (305)
810Y2V QUCV
pelleted oxidation
Yes
Yes
1590 (3500)
8.0 (10.7)
Ford
X&78
Mustang II
2-dr
8F02F187610
1857 (4095)
4.95 (302)
302 "D" (1x95)
monolith oxidation
No
Yes
1590 (3500)
9.2 (12.3)
Saab
1978
99
2-dr
99781008246
1728 (3810)
1.98 (121)
B120CA
3 -way
No
No
1360 (3000)
8.4 (11.3)
Mercury
1979
Marquis
2-dr
9263H519763
2434 (5365)
5.75 (351)
5.0W "BV" (2TT95x95)
dual bed
Yes
No
2040 (4500)
8.9 (12.0)
Fuel Tank Capacity, fc(gal)
68.5 (18.1)
62.5 (16.5)
54.9 (14.5)
71.9 (19.0)
-------
TABLE 2. FUEL SPECIFICATIONS
Item
Fuel
Code
Octane
Distillation range:
IBP, °c
5%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
95%
End Point
RVP, kPa(psi)
Hydrocarbon Composition
Olefins, %
Aromatics, %
Saturates, %
EM-373-F EM-374-F EM-375-F EH-371-F EM-372-F EM-389-F
92.3
26
41
49
61
77
93
111
137
143
161
184
197
231
68.9
(10.0)
17.2
29.8
53.0
94.8
25
41
48
56
61
96
114
129
137
150
185
193
210
75.2
(10.9)
16.6
28.9
54.5
96.4
30
44
51
59
71
85
112
134
149
166
183
196
211
68.9
(10.0)
17.6
34.6
47.8
96.5
27
43
55
71
87
99
107
114
131
142
163
168
184
62.1
(9.0)
0.4
28.5
71.1
98.9
30
47
52
60
67
74
101
111
124
137
160
166
176
66.2
(9.6)
0.6
25.7
73.7
97.0
27
44
56
75
92
101
108
114
126
134
162
170
193
62
(9
0
30
69
.7
.1)
.5
.0
.5
-------
C. Test Procedures
All exhaust and evaporative emission tests were conducted in accordance
with the Federal Test Procedure(1). Several unregulated emissions were also
measured. Some of these procedures are documented in a recent EPA report
prepared by SwRl<2) whiie others were developed as part of this program.
1. Regulated Emissions
All vehicle fueling and emission tests were performed according
to the procedures set forth in the Federal Register(D. The evaporative
emission loses (HC), gaseous emissions of hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide
(CO), and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) were collected and analyzed using the
procedures and equipment described in the gasoline FTP. The evaporative
emission enclosure (SHED) and related equipment was constructed according
to the requirements published in the Federal Register(D. The running loss
test portion of the evaporative emission test, which is optional, was not
performed.
The fueling of the vehicles employed a drum cooler to maintain a
maximum fuel temperature of 14°C. The tests were performed on a Clayton
chassis dynamometer. A constant volume sampler (CVS) with a nominal
capacity of 0.14 cubic meters per second (300 CFM) was used.
2. Unregulated Emissions
The unregulated emissions measured in this study were aldehydes,
individual hydrocarbons, ethanol and tertiary butyl alcohol. The aldehyCe
and individual hydrocarbon procedures were employed during the dynamometer
run portion of the FTP. -The ethanol and TEA procedures were used selectively
during both the dynamometer run and the evaporative emission run.
The aldehydes were measured using the 2,4 dinitrophenylhydrazine
(DNPH) method(2). The method consists of withdrawing a continuous 9*»p±«
of dilute exnaust and bubbling the sample through glass impingers containing
DNPH in hydrochloric acid. This forms the aldehydes1 phanylhydrazone
derivative which are eventually injected into a gas chromai-.ograph using a
flame ionization detector for separation and identification.
The term individual hydrocarbons is used to define the collection
and analysis of the following compounds: methane, ethane, ethylene, acetylene,
propane, propylene, benzene and toluene. The individual hydrocarbon (IHC)
procedure(2) consists of collecting dilute sample in Tedlar (DuPont Co.)
baas and injecting samples from the bags into a four column gas chronatograph
for separation and identification.
The tertiary butyl alcohol (TEA) procedure was developed during
this research effort in order to measure any TEA emissions due to the
addition of TEA to base gasoline. During the dynamometer run portion of
the FTP, a continuous sample of dilute exhaust was bubbled through glass
-------
impingers containing deionized water. During the evaporative emissions
portion of the FTP, two samples were withdrawn from the SHED into Tedlar
bags. One bag was collected during the first minute after the SHED door
was sealed and the second bag was obtained during the minute prior to the
end of the SHED test. High sample flow rates were employed to remove a
large sample from the SHED in a short time. The contents of the bag was
then drawn through impingers at the same flowrate as the sample collected
during the FTP. A sample from each impinger was injected into a gas chroma-
tograph using a flame ionization detector for quantitative analysis. A
detailed description of the analytical procedure for the measurement of
TEA in exhaust or evaporative emission is presented in Appendix A.
The ethanol procedure was also developed during this investigation
in order to measure any ethanol emissions from fuels containing ethanol.
During both the dynamometer run and SHED portion of the FTP, a continuous
sample of either dilute exhaust or SHED contents was drawn into a Tedlar
bag. A sample from the bag was injected into a gas chromatograph using a
flame ionization detector for separation and quantification. The detailed
description of the analytical procedure for the measurement of ethanol in
exhaust or evaporative emissions is presented in Appendix B.
A procedure for the analysis of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)
was attempted without success. A suitable trapping media and the similarity
of MTBE with other compounds in gasoline caused problems with collection
separation and quantification. After a reasonable effort, the Project
Officer requested a discontinuation of this procedural development.
D. Test Plan
The test plan and schedule are listed in Table 3 and Table 4. Figure
1 shows a typical test sequence.
E. Installation Photographs
Figures 2 and 3 are photographs of the test cell where this investigation
was performed. Figure 2 shows the Malibu being pushed into the evaporative
emission enclosure (SHED) after completing the dynamometer portion of the FTP.
The Saab has been pushed on the dynamometer after its removal from the SHED
to undergo the dynamometer run. The operator in the right of the picture
is calibrating the hydrocarbon analyzer and monitoring pertinent temperatures
prior to the sealing of the enclosure.
Figure 3 shows the test cell several minutes later. The Malibu is com-
pleting the hot soak portion of the evaporative emissions test while the Saab
is completing the dynamometer run. The Malibu will leave the SHED in time to
remove tha Saab and push it into the SHED. This type of test schedule will
enable the optimum number of vehicles to be tested in the shortest period of
time.
-------
TABLE 3. EXPERIMENTAL TEST PLAN
Step Item
1 Perform calibration and retention check on SHED.
2 Develop procedure for ethanol collection and analysis.
3 Develop procedure for tertiary butyl alcohol collection and
analysis.
4 Develop procedure for methyl tertiary butyl ether collection
and analysis.
5 Store received fuels in cold room.
6 Prepare 4 drums of 7% TEA + EM-389-F in cold room.
7 Prepare 4 drums of 7% MTBE + EM-389-F in cold room.
8 Modify fuel tanks on each vehicle with drain plugs and thermocouples.
9 Drain and refuel each vehicle to 20 percent tank capacity with
proper fuel.
10 Run one LA-4 cycle. Check idle CO and RPM first time on each
fuel and vehicle.
11 Hot soak one hour.
12 Drain and refuel each vehicle to 40 percent capacity.
13 Run another LA-4 cycle.
14 Soak each vehicle 12-24 hours @ 20-30°C.
15 Perform pretest of facility and instrument calibrations.
16 Prepare sample bags and impingers.
17 Run 3-bag FTP with evaporative emissions by:
a. Drain and refuel to 40 percent capacity, (fuel cap off).
b. Push vehicle into SHED.
c. Perform one hour diurnal heat build, (fuel cap on at 15.5"C).
Take be.g s-jiples from SHED at same points the HC is taken,
if required.
d. Immediately after heat build remove heat blanket and push
vehicle onto dynamometer.
e. Run 3-bag FTP emissions tests within 15 to 60 minutes.
f. Run one hour hot soak immediately following emissior.s test.
Take bag samples from SHED of the same points the HC is taken,
if required.
8
-------
TABLE 3 (Cont'd). EXPERIMENTAL TEST PLAN
Step Item
18 Precondition for next test.
a. If within 24 hours of FTP and will use the same fuel, go
to Step 12.
b. If longer than 24 hours since FTP or if changing fuel, go
to Step 9.
19 Follow test plan from Step 9 through Step 18 for each fuel and
vehicle listed in the Test Schedule.
-------
TABLE 4. TEST SCHEDULE
Test No.
Date
Car
Fuel
1-1
11-1
21-1
1-2
11-2
21-2
1-3
11-3
21-3
1-4
11-4
21-4
1-5
2-1
12-1
22-1
2-2
12-2
22-2
22-3
22-4
3-1
13-1
23-1
3-2
13-2
23-2
4-1
14-1
24-1
4-2
14-2
24-2
11-10-78
11-11-78
11-10-78
11-11-78
11-16-78
11-11-78
11-16-78
11-17-78
11-17-78
11-17-78
11-21-78
11-20-78
11-21-78
11-12-78
11-12-78
11-12-78
11-13-78
11-13-78
11-13-78
11-14-78
11-21-78
11-15-78
11-14-78
11-15-78
11-20-78
11-15-78
11-16-78
11-27-78
11-27-78
11-27-78
11-28-78
11-27-78
11-28-78
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Malibu
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Saab
Saab
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-
EM-373-F
EM-374-F
EM-374-F
EM-374-F
EM-374-F
EM-374-F
EM-374-F
EM-374-F
EM-374-F
EM- 3 75 -F
EM-375-F
EM-375-F
EM-375-F
EM-375-F
EM-375-F
EM-371-F
EM-371-F
EM-371-"
EM-371-F
EM-371-F
EM-371-F
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1.2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
10
-------
TABLE 4 (Cont'd). TEST SCHEDULE
Test No. Date Car Fuel Analyses
4-3
14-3
24-3
4-4
14-4
24-4
5-1
15-1
25-1
5-2
15-2
25-2
5-3
15-3
25-3
6-1
16-1
36-1
6-2
16-2
36-2
6-3
16-3
36-3
6-4
16-4
36-4
6-5
16-5
36-5
6-6
7-1
17-1
37-1
12-04-78
12K)4-78
12-04-78
12-05-78
12-05-78
12-05-78
11-29-78
11-29-78
11-29-78
11-30-78
11-30-78
11-30-78
12-01-78
12-01-78
12-01-78
5-08-79
5-08-78
5-08-79
5-09-79
5-09-79
5-09-79
5-10-79
5-10-89
5-10-79
5-22-79
5-22-79
5-22-79
5-23-79
5-23-79
5-23-79
5-24-79
5-14-79
5-14-79
5-14-79
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Malibu
Mustang
Saab
Malibu
Mustant
Saab
Malibu
Mustang
Marquis
Malibu
Mustang
Marquis
Malibu
Mustang
Marquis
Malibu
Mustang
Marquis
Malibu
Mustang
Marquis
Malibu
Malibu
Mustang
Marquis
EM-371-F
EM-371-F
EM-371-F
EM-371-F
EM-371-F
EM-371-F
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-389-F
EM-389-F
EM-389-F
EM-389-F
EM-389-F
EM-389-F
EM-389-F
EM-389-F
EM-389-F
EM-389-F
EM-389-F
EM-389-F
EM- 389 -F
EM-389-F
EH-389-F
EM-389-F
EM-385-F
EM-385-F
EM-385-F
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1.2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
1,2,3,4,5
11
-------
TABLE 4 (Cont'd). TEST SCHEDULE
Test No. Date Car Fuel Analyses
7-2 5-15-79 Malibu EM-385-F 1,2,3,4,5
17-2 5-15-79 Mustang EM-385-F 1,2,3,4,5
37-2 5-15-79 Marquis EM-385-F 1,2,3,4,5
7-3 5-25-79 MaJ.ibu EM-385-F 1,2,3,4,5
8-1 5-16-79 Malibu EM-386-F 1,2,3,4
18-1 5-16-79 Mustang EM-386-F 1,2,3,4
38-1 5-16-79 Marquis EM-386-F 1,2,3,4
8-2 5-17-79 Malibu EM-386-F 1,2,3,4
18-2 5-17-79 Mustang EM-386-F 1,2,3,4
38-2 5-17-79 Marquis EM-386-F 1,2,3,4
Analyses
1 = Continuous hydrocarbon
2 = CVS bags for CO, HC, NOX
3 = DNPH (aldehydes)
4 = Individual hydrocarbons
5 = Additive analysis
12
-------
Vehicle 1
SHKD
DHL
V ™—«i«»^
,5 1,5
Run
3-Ba'i
N— V-
2,3,4,
SHED
HSL
**s
1,5
5
Drain
&
Rofuc I
r
1,5
'roco
LA- 4
brain
I &
He fuel
(If
|Vq'd)
Pro con
iA-4
(If
Roq'd)
Vehicle 2
t
i
1,
sii'iD
5
I
1,
5
Dyno
kun
' . ' l
2,3,4,5
SHED
HSL,
,5
Ana lys'>s
1 = Continuous hydrocarbon
2 - CVS bags for CO, HC, NOX
3 = DNPH (aldehdyes)
4 = Individual hydrocarbons
5 =• Additive analysis
0 J
1
l
1
i
2
-|
3
4
Drain
<<> f UP 1
Pro con
I.A-4
)rnin Procor
?ofuol I.A-4
(If (If
Jrq'd) Ri-q'd)
1,5
Vehicle
1
3
SHED
DBL
,5
5
Dyno SHKD 1 Pt
Run HSL J—
1,5 '—^* ' 1,5 1,5
' -1
"T i i
6 7 8 *
Hours
P re con •
Figure 1. Typical Test Sequence
-------
Figure 2. Vehicle Being Placed In Evaporative Emission Enclosure
-------
'••
-
Figure 3. Vehicles Being Tested In Evaporative Emission Enclosure
And On Dynamometer
-------
IV. RESULTS
sec^'on describes the exhaust and evaporative emission results
for each vehi _e with the various t->st fuels. Comparisons are made between
the fuel blends and its respective base fuel for each vehicle.
A. 1978 Malibu
Regulated and several unregulated emissions were measured during the
FTP driving cycle. In addition, the ethanol and TEA,SHED and exhaust
emissions were determined for those fuels containing the respective
additive.
1. Regulated Emissions
The regulated emission results for each fuel with the Malibu are
presented in Tables C-4 through C-30 of Appendix C. These tables have been
summarized and the CO, HC, and NOX emission rates are listed in Table C-l
along with the HC evaporative emission. In order to provide a visual com-
parison of the base fuel and fuel Mends, the average emission rates have
been plotted as a bar graph in Figure 4.
The gaseous emissions from the dynamometer run indicated no signi-
ficant changes in HC and NOX emissions for all eight fuels. The ethanol,
TEA, and MTEE fuel mixtures did, however, reduce the CO emissions between
20 and 40 percent of their respective base fuels.
Table C-l also contains fuel consumption values. These values
were calculated by the computer using a carbon balance procedure. The carbon
balance procedure uses the carbon to hydrogen ratio of the fuel and exhaust
compounds containing carbon to establish a balance. The computer normally
calculates fuel consumption based on clear Indolene's carbon to hydrogen
ratio of 1:1.85. It was not within the scope of this research effort to
determine the ratio for each fuel and change the computer format to accept the
various ratios. All of the fuel consumption values in the computer printouts
are based on a carbon to hydrogen ratio of 1:1.85 and therefore do no reflect
the actual gain or loss in fuel consumption using the various fuel mixtures.
There was no significant difference in the HC evaporative emissions
of the .>ase fuel (Fuel A, EH-373-F) and the two ethanol blends (Fuel B,
EM-374-F and Fuel C, EM-375-F). A noticeable difference was observed
between the winter grade base fuel (Fuel D, EM-371-F) and the respective 10
percent ethanol blend (Fuel E, D'.-372-F). The increase in the evaporative
emissions was about 40 percent due to the ethanol in the winter grade fuel.
. ' •••-**>
A second batch of base fuel was used with the two additives, TEA
and MTBE. The 7 percent TBA in the base fuel had essentially no effect on
the evaporative emissions. This was not observed with the MTBE blend (Fuel H,
EM-386-F) whert a 36 percent increase in evaporative emissions was observed.
16
-------
c,
e
1..
St.uid.irij!; ~~ •
A • EM-373-P
B = KM-374-F
C = EM-37S-F
U = EM-371-F
E = EM-372-F
K " EM-3H'J-F
fi » KN-Jll'i-F
II •> KM-Jtll.-F
—. i IH
rTTTrrrn.
HC
A II
C
I)
ni
*—
t: F
n
i;
1
n
i>
\ \
^•B
'
rfl
1
k It
••MB
•:
fw*.
V
~**m
;
1
.
-
.'4
- • 1
CO nuj(
Figure 4. Malibu FTP and Evaporative Emissions
-------
2. Unregulated Emissions
Aldehyde, individual hydrocarbons (1HC), and ethanol or TEA
concentrations were measured during the dynamometer portion of the FTP.
The average of the data runs are summarized in Table 5. The data for each
individual run is presented in Table C-2 and C-3 of Appendix C. The alde-
hyde emissions generally increased using the fuels containing ethanol, TEA
and MTBE. It should be noted, however, that the aldehyde data was somewhat
scattered due to the observed (low) concentrations approaching the detection
limits of the analytical method. There was no significant change in the
individual hydrocarbons due to the ethanol, TEA or MTBE. The only exception
to this was that the methane emission rates were about 20 percent lower
with TEA and MTBE than the corresponding base fuel. No ethanol or TEA
was observed in the exhaust (MTBE measurements were not made).
The ethanol evaporative emission rates typically ranged from
2-3 g/test. The TEA evaporative emissions ranged from 3-7 g/test accounting
for a estimated 15-25 percent of the evaporative hydrocarbons. It should
be noted that the total hydrocarbon values obtained frjm the SHED are as
measured and are not corrected for ethanol, TEA or MTBE FID responses.
B. Mustang
Regulated and several unregulated emission results were obtained during
tne entire FTP using several gasolines and gasoline mixtures of ethanol,
TEA and MTBE.
1. Regulated Emissions
The results of each individual run for regulated emissions is
presented as Tables D-4 through D-27 of Appendix D. The HC, CO and NOX
emission rates are summarized in Table D-l. The average emission rate
for the FTP exhaust and SHED emissions is presented as the bar graph in
Figure 5. As illustrated, essentially no change in the HC exhaust emissions
was observed with the fuel blends. This was not the case where the NOX
levels decreased slightly, (about 15 percent) with the base fuel with ethanol.
VJith TEA and MTBE, the NOX emissions increased by 10 percent relative to the
base fuel. The CO emission rates decreased with all fuel blends, ranging
from a 15-30 percent reduction.
The average hydrocarbon evaporative emissions for each test fuel
is presented in Figure 5. The HC evaporative emissions increased by a factor
of three with the ethanol blends, doubled with the TEA blend while increasing
only slightly with the MTBE blend. The Mustang was the most sensitive to
the fuel blend composition.
2. Unregulated Emissions
During the dynamometer portion of the FTP, aldehyde and individual
hydrocarbons were measured. Measurements for TEA and ethanol were made also
when fuels containing these components were used. The data are averaged and
summarized in Table 6. The data for each individual run is listed in Table
D-2 and D-3 of Appendix D. The low concentrations of aldehydes observed
18
-------
TABLE 5. MALIBU AVERAGE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Average Aldehyde, mg/km
Methylethyl
Fuel
EM-373-F
EM-374-F
EM-375-F
EM-371-F.
EM-372-F
EM-389-F
EM-385-F
EM-386-F
* Includes
Fuel
EM-373-F
EM-374-F
EM-375-F
EM-371-F
EM-372-F
EM-389-F
EM-385-F
EM-386--F
Form. Acet.
1.51 0.34
1.12 0.50
1.71 0.59
0.93 0.06
1.72 0.54
0.56 0
1.59 0.37
0.84 0.06
Acetone*
0.09
0.28
0.03
0.06
0.08
0
0.19
0.13
Ispbuty .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Ketone Croton. Hexan. Benzene Total
0.06
0.03
0.06
0.12
0.10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
—
0
0
0
.01 0
.06 0
.06 0
.11 0.00
0 0
.06 0
.16 0
.17 0,.3L.
0.43
0.41
0.81
2.19
1.92
2.45
1.33
-i»92
1.01
2.61
1 . 90
acrolein and propanol
Average
Individual Hydrocarbon, mg/km
Methane Ethylene Ethane Acetylene Propane
46.96
45.54
44.00
43.31
38.38
57.98
45.24
45.18
19.99 10
21.66 10
20.91 10
10.44 9
10.69 10
12.57 8
10.89 9
11.13 9
.00 2.
.36 2.
.19 3.
.73 1.
.05 2.
.90 1.
.67 1.
.72 1.
40
73
64
16
77
99
49
74
4.16
1.41
1.68
1.80
2.05
1.96
2.11
2.15
Propylene
3.34
4.13
3.79
4.08
3.27
5.02
4.17
4.35
Benzene
6.95
6.06
7.55
2.94
2.24
5.29
4.04
3.45
Toluene
7.59
8.32
8.49
8.10
7.97
26.76
20.71
19.98
Evaporative, g
Fuel
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-374-F
EM-374-F
EM-375-F
EM-375-F
EM-385-F
EM-385-F
EM-385-F
Date
11-29-78
11-30-78
12-1-78
11-12-78
11-13-78
11-15-78
11-20-78
5-14-79
5-15-79
5-25-79
Component
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Etlianol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
TBA
TBA
TBA
DDL
1.45
1.60
0.96
1.77
1.67
1.88
1.51
0.65
0.19
0.40
HSL
1.61
1.61
0.48
1.14
0.48
0.32
0.43
0.06
0.06
0.05
Total FTP, g/km
3.06
3.21
1.44
2.91
2.15
2.20
1.94
0.71
0.25
0.45
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-------
• J- •
I'll.-1
A - i:H- )'l I-K
II « !•:«- 174-K
c - i-:w- 17•,-!••
II = liM-m-K
I: • t:n- V/.NI
f • I:M- ui'i-r
i. • I:M- di'i-r1
II KM- IU',-l
. -V- .,
. -M'
- -\
A ii i' i> i: i-1 <; n A it i- o K F r, H /\ n (.• n y. f <; n
HC CO
A II I1 !> I! V <• II
SHED
Figvire 5. Mustang Total FTP Emissions
-------
TABLE 6. MUSTANG AVERAGE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Average Aldehyde, mg/km
Fuel
EM-373-F
EM-374-F
EM-375-F
EM-371-F
EM-372-F
EM-389-F
EM-385-F
EM-386-F
* Includes
Form, ACet. Acetone* Isobuty. Ketone
1.36 0.
1.34 1.
2.15 2.
1.43 0
1.47 0.
17 0.04
06 0.41
02 0.34
0.06
91 0.10
1.39 0.25 0.08
2.27 0.
0.44 0.
acrolein and
34 0.16
03 0
propanol
0 0
0 0
0.06 • 0
0 0
0 0
0.10 0
0.19 0
0 0
.04
.10
.06
.16
.06
.06
Average Individual Hydrocarbon,
Fuel
EM-373-F
EM-374-F
EM-37S-F
EM-371-F
EM-372-F
EM-3G9-F
EM-385-F
EM-386-F
Methane
49.92
56.83
50.18
43.54
46.32
58.17
45.37
46.20
Ethylene
32.87
36.29
35.51
16.75
15.74
23.19
20.10
14.98
Ethane Acetylene
22.47 1.70
23.93 3.17
21.50 1.55
24.07 3.06
24.65 1.70
20.64 2.57
19.61 1.59
17.00 2.09
Croton Hexan. Benzene Total
0 0.12 0.28
0 0.10 1.28
0 0.13 1.28
0 0.19 0.31
0 0.17 0.47
0 0 1.59
0.03 0 1.40
0.12 0 0.19
mg/km
Propane Propylene Benzene
4.89
4.54
13.55
C.23
6.77
4.66
5.16
3.95
14.48 16.22
11.81 16.75
11.72 16.41
11.37 10.29
11.07 6.81
28.30 21.46
12.71 11.99
9.82 10.13
1.
4.
6.
2.
3.
2.
4.
1.
Toluene
13.80
21.94
18.70
25.91
22.31
72.03
59.13
53.25
96
39
06
18
18
62
38
09
Evaporative , g
Fuel
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-374-F
EM-374-F
EM-375-F
EM-375-F
EM-385-F
EM-385-F
Date
11-29-78
11-30-78
11-12-78
11-13-78
11-14-78
11-15-78
5-14-79
5-15-79
Component DBL
Ethanol 0.01
Ethanol 0.12
Ethanol 0.06
Ethanol 0.05
Ethanol 0.06
Ethanol 0.09
TEA 0
TEA 0
HSL
5.42
6.39
11.50
9.47
9.38
8.04
1.10
1.32
Total FTP, g/km
5.43 0
6.51 0
11.56 0
9.52 0
9.44 0
8.13 0
1.10 0
1.32 0
-------
caused some scatter as seen before. Generally the total aldehydes increased
using fuels containing ethanol and TEA. Fuel H, MTBE mixture, may have
reduced total aldehydes by forming less formaldehyde as the data indicated.
The individual hydrocarbons remained fairly consistent within each group of
base fuel and mixtures. Again, there was no significant change in the
individual hydrocarbons due to the ethanol, TBA and MTBE. The only exception
was methane, whic.i was reduced by about 20 percent with TBA and MTBE. Ethanol
and tertiary butyl alcohol were not detected in the exhaust. The oxidation
catalyst on this vehicle probably oxidized any unburnt alcohols.
Table 6 also contains the evaporative alcohol emissions. The
results are repeatable for each fuel tested and indicate that most of the
alcohol evaporative losses occur during the hot soak portion of the SHED
test. During the hot soak portion, which occurs immediately after the
dynamometer run, the vehicles engine is hot. The carburetor fuel bowl on
this vehicle is very close to the intake manifold. This position could
cause a fuel with a lower boiling point, such as the alcohol mixture, to
boil out more readily than the base fuel.
The ethanol evapor? "-.ive emission rates were about 6 g/test for
the summer grade ethanol blends accounting for about 25 percent of the total
HC evaporative emission. The ethanol evaporative emission rate increased
to 11 g/test with the winter grade fuel accounting 65 percent of the hydro-
carbons (on an as-measured basi s with no FID response factors applied).
Those tests with the TBA indicate that the TBA accounts for essentially all
of the SHED HC evaporatove emissions.
C. Saab
Gasolines and gasolines containing ethanol were evaluated during the
evaporative emission enclosure and dynamometer portion of the FTP. Regulated
and several unregulated emissions were measured.
1. Regulated Emissions
The regulated emission results for each individual run is presented
in Table E-3 through E-20 of Appendix E. The HC, CO and NOx emission rates
for these tests have been summarized in Table E-l. Figure 6 illustrates
comparison of the average emission rate for HC, CO, and NOX from the FTP
and HC from SHED tests. As illustrated, there were no significant changes
in the HC and NOX FTP emission rates due to the ethanol, whereas there was
a definite decrease (approximately 10-20 percent) in the CO emission with
both ethanol blends. The HC evaporative emissions were essentially unaffected
by the ethanol fuel blends. The SHED HC evaporative results were conflicting
in that one ethanol blend increased HC emissions, one was lower and one was
equal to the comparable base fuel.
22
-------
7- •
J. .
E
U
I--
F.t .uuljftls
KlK-1
A > IJM-37J-F
B * KM-JV4-F-'
f - l.'M-J7'i-K
0 " liM-J71-f
K = KM-J7^-K
A B C U K
KC
A U C C E
CO
A B C D K
NO,
A U C I) C
SHED
Figure 6. Saab FTP and Evaporative Emissions
-------
2. Unregulated Emissions
Individual hydrocarbons (IHC), aldehyde and ethanol emissions were
measured during each dynamometer run. The ciata for each fuel has been
c-veraged and is listed in Table 7. The individual data points for each test
are listed in Tables E-2 and E-3 of Appendix E. As discussed previously,
and especially in this case, the aldehyde emissions are very low and are
near the detection limits of this analytical method, and do not indicate any
definitive trends. The IHC results showed that methane was 20 percent lower
with Fuel E (EM-371-F) than the base Fuel T (EM-372-F). No changes in methane
emission rates were observed with Fuels A, B, and C (EM-373-F, EM-374-F and
EM-375-F). The remaining individual hydrocarbons were only slightly unaffected
or showed no definite trends. No ethanol was observed in the exhaust.
The evaporative ethar.ol emissions are listed in Table 7. Tne
repeatability for each ethanol fuel mixture was good. Fuel C (EM-375-F)
and Fuel E (EM-372-F) exhibited similar results on both portions of the
evaporative test. Fuel B (EM-374-F) emitted approximately a third of the
ethanol emissions as Fuels C (EM-375-Fi and E (EM-372-F). Fuels C and E
are similar to one another as far as evaporative emissions are concerned but
dissimilar in the area of exhaust emissions. The fuel specifications support
this in that both Fuels C and E have identical initial boiling points but a
large variance in hydrocarbon composition.
O. Marquis
Regulated and several unregulated emissions results were obtained
during the entire FTP using a base gasoline and gasoline mixtures of tertiary
butyl alcohol (TEA) and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE).
1. Regulated Emissions
The results of the individual run computer printouts are presented
in Tables F-2 through F-10 of Appendix F. These results have been summarized
and are presented in Table F-.l. The average CO, HC and NOX FTP emissions and
SKED evaporative emissions are illustrated in Figure 7. The CO emissions
were reduced 30-40 percent with both the TEA and MTBE fuel blends. There
was no effect on the NOX emissions with the fuel blends while only a slight
decrease in HC emissions was observed. The TEA and MTEE had no effect on
the HC evaporative emissions.
2. Unregulated Emissions
Individual hydrocarbons, aldehydes, and TEA emissions were also
measured during the dynamometer run. Table 8 lists the average for the data.
The individual data points for each run is listed in Appendix F, Table F-l.
Again the aldehyde emissions are low and the data inclusive. The individual
hydrocarbor, results indicate trends previously seen on the other vehicles.
Methane emissions were reduced approximately 20 percent with Fuel G and H
while the remaining hydrocarbons remained fairly constant. The exhaust did
not contain any measureable amounts of TBA.
24
-------
TABLE 7. SAAB AVERAGE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Average Aldehyde, rog/tan
Fuel
EM-373-F
EM-374-F
EM-375-F
EM-371-F
EM-372-F
Form.
0.23
0.17
0.35
0.19
0.21
Acet.
0.19
0.18
0.04
0.19
0.23
Acetone*
0.03
0.14
0.03
0.09
0.04
Isobuty .
0
0
0
C
0
Methylethyl
Ketone
0.08
0.06
0.06
0.16
0.12
Includes acrolein and propanol
Croton.
Hexan.
Fuel
Methane
Average Individual Hydrocarbon, mg/km
Ethylene Ethane Acetylene Propane Propylene
Benzene
Total
0.17
0.08
0.09
0.22
0.19
0.28
0.08
0
0.41
0^10- -
0.98
0.60
0.82
1.25
-*r89
Benzene
Toluene
EK-373-F
EM-374-F
EM-375-F
EM-371-F
EM-372-F
33.04
30.34
30.64
20.41
16.41
15.37
14.20
16.50
9.46
7.91
5.59
4.60
4.94
3.18
2.73
2.61
2.68
3.20
1.90
1.82
1.15
0.78
1.40
0.31
0.60
6.42
5.81
6.03
6.60
5.45
15.19
11.89
14.29
7.55
6.36
9.88
9.34
12.46
12.21
10.11
Evaporative, g
Fuel
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-374-F
EM-375-F
EM-375-F
Date
11-30-78
12-1-78
11-21-78
11-15-78
11-16-78
Component
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
Ethanol
DBL
0.40
0.53
0.22
0.32
0.27
HSL
0.55
0.68
0.14
0.68
0.86
Total
0.95
1.21
0.36
1.00
1.13
FTP, g/km
0
0
0
0
0
-------
7- •
a
x
u>
A
• -i*.
TO
I <; it
HC
CO
Figure 7. Hacquie FTP and Evaporative Emissions
-------
TABLE 8. MARQUIS AVERAGE UNREGULATED EMISSIONS RESULTS
Aldehyde, mg/km
N)
-j
Fuel
FM-389-F
EM-385-F
EM-386-F
* Includes
Form.
0.73
1.03
1.00
Acet. Acetone*
0.02 0.09
0 0
0 0
Isobuty.
0.10
0.03
0
Methylethyl
Ketone
0.07
0
0
Croton Hexan.
0.04 0
0 0
0.09 0
Benzene Total
0.78 1.37
0 1.06
0.03 1.12
acrolein and propanol
Individual Hydrocarbon, mg/km
Fuel
EM-389-F
EM-385-F
EM-386-F
Methane Ethylcne Ethane Acetylene Propane
48
41
41
.72 3.09
.45 2.36
.79 2.83
3.33 3.19
3.64 1.65
3.48 2.30
1.41
0.94
0.72
Propylene Benzene Toulene
1.91 3.94
1.18 2.21
1.43 2.49
14.42
9.54
11.37
Evaporative, g
Fuel Date
EM-385-F 5-14-79
EM-385-F 5-15-79
Compound
TEA
TBA
DEL HSL
0 0.047
0 0.055
Total FTP, g/km
0.047 0
0.055 0
-------
The evaporative TEA emissions are also listed in Table 8. The
results indicate that all of TEA measured came from the hot soak portion
of the test. This vehicle exhibited the lowest evaporative emissions,
both TBA and HC, of all the vehicles evaluated in this study.
E. Discussion of Results
The results of this research effort indicated that fuel mixtures con-
taining ethanol, tertiary butyl alcohol (TBA) and methyl tertiary butyl ether
affect the regulated exhaust and evaporative emissions in the same general
manner. Little or no effect on HC or NOX emission rates was observed on
a net mass level with any of the aformentioned fuel supplements. Carbon
monoxide emission rates were significantly reduced with all fuel blends on
all four test vehicles. This reduction is summarized as a bar graph in
Figure 8. An earlier study(3) on non-catalyst vehicles indicated similar
trends.
A comparison of the evaporative emission hydrocarbons for the various
test fuels are summarized in Fijiare 9. Of the four test cars in the pro-
gram, the fuel blends had the least effect on the Saab and Marquis, whereas
the Mustang and Malibu had increased evaporative emissions with two of the
three fuel blends. No increase was observed in the unregulated emissions
measured in the exhaust. Significant amounts of fuel additives (i.e.,
ethanol, TBA or MTBE) in the evaporative emissions were observed on some
tests.
In general, the test to test variability of evaporative emissions is
considerably greater than for regulated emissions. This is due in part
to the design and location of the specific HC evaporative emission control
system.
The use of.fuels studied in this report should not interfere with any
of the vehicles studied meeting the Federal Emissions Standards for gaseous
emissions generated on the dynamometer portion of the FTP. Depending on the
evaporative system of the vehicle, the HC Evaporative Emission Standard may
be difficult to meet in specific cases.
28
-------
(I
u .
Hasp
lithanol
ai
TBA
Vehicles
A = Malibu
D « Mustang
C - Saab
D = Marquis
MTDE
BCD A R C A B D A
Ki-|in-(.> H. C.irbon Monoxick' Kmifiuion Rate Summary For All Typos Of TVst Fu-. Is
-------
'
o
•a ™
•2 15
(n
2 io
o
Base
'-•'-• y//
1
Ethanol
TBA
• • •
.V.
Vehicles
A » Malibu
B « Mustang
C = Saab
D = Marquis
MTBE
A H C D A II C AGO A B D
Fiqun- '). Hydrocarbon Evaporative Emission Summary For All Typos OC Test I-'uols
-------
REFERENCES
1. Federal Register, Volume 42, No. 124, Part III, June 28, 1977.
2. Analytical Procedures for Characterizing Unregulated Pollutant
Emissions from Motor Vehicles, Environmental Science Research Laboratory,
Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, February 1979.
3. Brinkman, N.D., N.E. Gallopaulos, and M.W. Jackson, Vxhaust
Emissions, Fuel Economy and Driveability of Vehicles Fueled with Alcohol-
Gasoline Blends", Paper 750120, presented at SAE Engineering Congress,
Detroit, Michigan, February 1975.
31
-------
APPENDIX R
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE FOP THE MEASUREMENT OF TERTIARY BUTYL ALCOHOL
IN EXHAUST AND SHED EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS
A-1
-------
THE MEASUREMENT OF TERTIARY BUTYL ALCOHOL
IN EXHAUST AND IN EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS
The measurement of TEA in exhaust and in evaporative emissions is
accomplished by bubbling the samples through two glass impingers containing
deionized water. TEA is highly soluble in water; therefore, it is efficiently
trapped in the impingers. The exhaust sample is collected continuously
during the driving cycle. The evaporative sample is collected in a Tedlar
bag from the evaporative emission enclosure, then bubbled through the water.
A portion of each of these solutions is injected into a gas chromatograph
equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID). External standards of
diluted 99.5% TEA are used to quantify the results. Detection limits of
this procedure is on the order of 0.1 ppm.
LIST OF EQUIPMENT REAGENTS
The equipment and reagents for the analysis of the tertiary butyl
alcohol are divided into two groups. The first involve the sample acquisition
and the second the instrumental analysis of the sample once is has been
obtained. Manufacturer, stock number and any pertinent descriptive infor-
mation are listed.
Glass impingers, ACE Glass Products, Catalog fe7530-ll, plain tapered
tip stoppers with 18/7 arm joints and 29/42 bottle joints.
2. Flowmeter, Brooks Instrument Division, Model 1555, tube size R-2-15-C,
graduated 0-15, sapphire float, 0-5 £./min range.
3. Sanple pump, Thomas Model 106 CA18, capable of free flow capacity
of 4
4. Dry gas meter, American Singer Corporation, Type AL-120, 60 CFH
capacity .
5. Regulating valve, Nupro 4MG, stainless steel.
6. Teflon tubing, United States Plastic Corporation, 1/4" OD x 1/8" ID
and 5/16" OD x 1/8" ID.
7. Teflon solenoid valve, the Fluorocarbon Company, Model DV2-144NCAL.
8. Drying tube, Analabs Inc., Catalog SHGC-146, 6" long 1/4" brass
fittings.
9. Miscellaneous Teflon nuts, ferrules, unions, tees, clamps , connectors ,
etc.
10. Digital readout for dry gas meter.
A-2
-------
11. Miscellaneous .electrical switches, lights, wirings, etc.
12. Six channel digital thermometer. Analog Devices, Model 83026/J/l.
13. Iron/Constantan type J single thermocouple with 1/4" OD stainless
steel metal sheath, Thermo Sensors Corporation.
14. 30 mi. polypropylene sample storage bottles, Nalgene Labware,
Catalog #2006-0001.
15. Filtered deionized H2O.
16 Tedlar bags.
Instrumental Analysis
1. 10 ufc syringe, Hamilton Co., Reno, Nevada.
2. Varian Aerograph Series 1400 Gas Chromatograph equipped with a
flame ionization detector (FID).
3. Soltec Model B-281 1 mv recorder.
4. Hewlett-Packard Model 3354 gas chromatograph computer system with
remote teletype printout.
5. Perkin-Elmer Dial-A-Flow.
Preparation of Primary Standards
The primary standards for the TEA are prepared by diluting 99.5% TEA
(certified by Aldrich Chemical Co./ Inc.) to known concentrations with
filtered deionized H2
-------
CVS
Enclosure
Glass
Impinger
Small
Aliquot
Gas
Chromatograph
Recorder
Tcdlar Bags
A/D Converter
Hewlett-Packard
3354 GC Computer
Figure B-l. TEA Analysis Flow Schematic
A-4
-------
V
I"
Evaporative
Emissions
Enclosure
I
Regulating
Valve
Sample /""\
Bag ' »
Gas Temperature
Digital Readout
Dilute
Exhaust
Ice Uatli
Temperature
Digital Readout
~iZ Volume
Digital Readout
Figure B-2. Tertiary Butyl A]coliol Sample Collection Flow Schematic
-------
For collection of the TBA' samples during the evaporative emissions SHED
test, four Tedlar bags are collected. One is collected at the beginning,
and one at the end of each the diurnal breathing loss and the hot soak loss
phases of the test. The sample is pumped from the SHED into the Tedlar bags
at a rate of approximately 25 fc/rain for 3 minutes. Tnis flow rate is used
to attain the maximum sample volume in the shortest period of time. The
bags are then plumbed into the same system as described for the bubbling of
the dilute exhaust samples.
Analytical Procedure
The analysis of the terirary butyl alcohol is accomplished by trapping
the TBA in. deionized ^O and analyzing the sample with a gas chroraatograph
equipped with a FID.
For the analysis of the TBA, either dilute exhaust or evaporative
emissions collected in Tedlar bags, are bubbled through a pair of glass
impingers, each containing 25 mH of eleionnzed H2O. Due to the high solu-
bility of TBA in HjO, 95+% of compound is trapped in the two impingers.
The temperature of the impingers is maintained a 0-5°C by an ice water bath,
and the flow rate through the impinger is kept at 4 £/min. At the completion
of sampling, the impingers are removed and the contents are transferred
to 30 ra£ polypropylene bottles until analysis.
A Varian Aerograph Series 1400 gas chromatograph equipped with a flame
ionization detector (FID) is used to analyze the sample. A 5 ufc portion
of the sample is injected into the gas chormatograph (GC). The column is
a 10" x 1/8" OD, 1/16" ID Teflon column, containing 60/80 mesh Chromosorb 102.
This column was found effective because there is no deterioration due to
H20 injections and it gave an appropriate retention time for TBA. The
carrier gas is helium, which flows through the column at a rate of 65 mJl/min.
A Perkin-Elmer Dial-A-Flow is used to give added control over the carrier
gas flow rate. Optimum flows for the FID air and H2 were found to be 300
m£/min and 40 m£/min. respectively. The column temperature is maintained
at 170°C at all times during analysis. The ares of the TBA sample peaks,
which are seen at a retention time of approximately 3 minutes are compared
to the peak areas of standard solutions.
Calculation
This procedure has been developed to provide the user with the concen-
tration of tertiary butyl alcohol in the exhaust and the evaporative emission
enclosure. Calculation of the results are expressed in pg TBA/m^.
DERIVATION OF EQUATION
Let Csam = concentration of sample, Ug/m£
Cstd = concentration of standard, ]ag/m£
Asam - GC peak area of sample, relative units
Astd - GC peak area of standard, relative units
A-6
-------
Since the gas chromatograph flame ionization detector (FID) has demon-
strated a linear response, the following equation holds true:
Csam _ Cstd
Asam Astd
_ Cstd x Asam
CSam " —SStd
The Csam in the solution is corrected for any necessary dilution by
multiplying by the dilution factor.
„ Cstd, \ig/mi a Asam x D.F.
Csam = *—-—
Astd
To obtain the total TEA in the absorbing solution, the absorbing reagent
volume (expressed in m£) is multiplied to get the equation:
n
Cstd, pg/m£. x Asam x D.F. x Abs. vol, m
CSam = __
(ug)
The next step is to convert the sample concentration to yg per volume
expressed in cubic meters. The sample acquisition is effected using dry gas
meters that have units expressed in cubic feet. To make this conversion, the
following steps are observed.
Csam _ Cstd, yig/mH x Asam x D.F. x Abs. Vol., ml,
(ug/ft3) ~ Astd x Sam. Vol., ft3
Csam _ Cstd, \ig/mH x Asam x D.F. x Abs. vol., m£ x 35.31 ft3
(yg/ft3) ~ Astd x Sam. Vol., ftj x 1 mj
The sample volume was measured at the actual conditions of the test and
is corrected to 20°C (68°F) and 760 mm Hg (29.92 HG)
Csam _ Cstd, yg/m £x Asaro x D.F. x Abs. vol., mH
(yg/m3) ~ Astd x sam. vol., ft3 x 1 m3 x B.P.,"Hg
35.31 ft3 x 29.92"Hg x sample temp °F -t- 460CF
X 528°R
At this point, the concentration of the sample is expressed in Ug/m3 at
20°C (68°F) and 760 mm (29.92° Hg).
A-7
-------
This value is used to determine the amount of TBA in exhaust or in the
evaporative enissions enclosure by multiplying the value by the total volume
of either the ninclosure or the CVS flow. The IvR. value is then reported in
either grams (for evaporative emissions) or divided by the number of kilometers
the vehicle traveled to obtain milligrams per kilometer.
A-8
-------
APPENDIX B
ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF ETHYL ALCOHOL
IN EXHAUST AND SHED EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS
6-1
-------
THE MEASUREMENT OF ETHYL ALCOHOL IN SHED EXHAUST AND EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS
The measurement of ethyl alcohol in exhaust and evaporative emissions
was accomplished by direct bag analysis using a gas chromatograph equipped
with a flame ionization detector. A limited number of qualification and
validation experiments were conducted to insure the accuracy and reliability
of the procedure. Contacts were made with key individuals at EPA, Ann Arbor
and Research Triangle Park to coordinate the approach to this analysis with
other participants in the evaporative emissions program.
Analytical System
The analysis for ethyl alcohol in exhaust and evaporative emissions is
conducted using a gas chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector.
The system employs two pneumatically operated electrically controlled Seiscor
valves, one in a gas sampling valve configuration and the other in the back-
flush configuration. Figure A-l illustrates the flow schematic of the analy-
tical system.
The system was deisgned for bag analysis and used normal CVS bag samples
for the exhaust emissions. In the case of the SHED emissions, bag samples
were collected during the first and last minute of the soak. These bags
were then transported to the gas chromatograph for subsequent analysis.
The analytical column selected for this separation was a 10' x 1/8" SS
with 15% TCEP on 60/80 Chromosorb P. The separation of ethyl alcohol from
benzene and toluene was satisfactory and no known interferences were en-
countered. The gas chromatograph oven was maintained at 50°C and the system
was backflushed after the toluene peak. The total analysis time was 45-60
minutes. A typical separation of ethyl alcohol and the two closest eluting
compounds is presented in Figure A-2. The specific GC operating parameters
for this separation is presented in Table A-l.
Control System
The control of the two Seiscor valves is accomplished by ATC timers
and ASCO electric solenoid valves. The electrical schematic for the control
of the Seiscor valves using these timers and electric solenoid valves is
shown in Figure A-3. The flow schematic for the vacuum and pressure lines
to the Seiscor valves are presented in Figure A-4.
Equipment
This analysis is performed using a gas chromatograph equipped with a
flame ionization detector. The gas chromatograph, recorder and data ac-
quisition system are major components in the detection system. A control
console was fabricated to house the mechanical hardware items that are
necessary for r.he proper operation of the ethyl alcohol analysis system.
The major items that are included in each of these systems is listed as
follows:
B-2
-------
Analytical Column
(10' X 1/8" SS 15% TCEP)
Seiscpr Valve
(backflush configuration)
Vent
Perkin-Elmer
900
Flame lonization
Detector
Seiscor Valve
(Gas Sanpling Configuration)
Carrier
Gas
10 ml sanple loop
Regulating
Valve
Pimp
Female
Quick-Connect
Flowmeter
Figure A-l. Ethyl Alcohol Analytical Flow Schematic
B-3
-------
: • ; ' : ;
I
i !
4
; i ;
! >
. i i !
i i i :
t •
: ! , ! :
T "^r^ •
i i
i \
\ i '
i i
— i — r.._ — T.._.^.—« —
i ! ! ; :
1
i
• : : LU -
TH r '
Hi 1
! ' pit:
..
A :
! /! \
... -t , y...v._4- _. . .-
• 1 / \; I
— '. / .1 .._L__=^ok_J ,
T_y \ . T ~*
m> i i i i i
23 22 21 20 19 18 1
i il
: :
: :
1
" ' !
: 1
i
'Tr;
J;
— rT:
i I
I/I
i |
7 16 15 1
«
H
! i
»— 4 '
< : ;
I ; .
. 1 ^v« •* - • *— - - - .
i
1
; ,
, ,
|
• • •
— - --TT- ^
i
< I
0>
t aJ
: 1 •
- 1 •; ..-. .. ...
L ill. :
! j\ ;
i i i v- 1
4 13 12 11 10
I T
1
, , (•** (*} i . - . .- - - - •
1 • '
j •
i :
!
i ! ;
• i
I , !
• • i
: . i i .1
; ; ; ;
1
: i : i , i :'
' -~- - -* — -f —-••-;--
i 1
..: i ....... ..; :.
: , \ • •
i ; ; *
i •
•pT
A*n
i •
\ i
i
• r\ :
i • • .
- j • -r^j nl±:
38 76 54 3210
Raatention Time, minutes
Figure A-2. Typical Separation of Ethyl Alcohol from Benzene and Toluene
-------
TABLE A-l. ETHYL ALCOHOL ANALYSIS GAS CHROMATOGRAPH OPERATING PROCEDURES
Gas Chromatpgraph:
Detector Type:
Gas Sampling Valve:
Backflush Valve
Sample Loop Size:
Column Temperature:
Detector Temperature:
Injection Temperature:
Carrier Gas:
Carrier Gas Flow:
Hydrogen Gas Flow:
Air Flow Rate:
Column Dimensions:
Column Material:
Perkin-Elmer Model 900
Flame lonization Detector
Seiscor Model VIII (GSV Configuration)
Seiscor Model VIII (BF Configuration)
10 ml
50°C
50°C
27°C
Helium
30 ml/min
40 ml/min
400 ml/min
10' x 1/8" SS
15% TCEP on 60/80 Chromosorb P-AW
B-5
-------
V
•
L
3
4
';
11
12
M
15
16 j
...j
ATC
Timor
"> 1
..-._,
Ik- 1
•"
2 . . <
4 _ , _>/"
' ~
5 ______
q
r "
/—
GSV
solenoid
!
_ J
esP
Sre
a a
11
12
14
IS
16
ATC
Tinier
lay
•a
L-0
baokflush
solenoid
Ficjure A-3. Electrical Schematic for Nitrous Oxide Analysis System
-------
Aj r Pressure (30 p
psi) f
CSV off
Vacuum
BacXflush off
Figure A-4. Flow Schematic in Electric Solenoid Valves
(Both valves de-energized)
B-7
-------
Gas Chromatograph
1. Perkin-Elmer Model 900 chromatograph
2. Soltec Model B-281 recorder
3. Hewlett-Packard Model 3354C GC computer system
4. Hewlett-Packard Model 1865A A/D Converter
5. Analytical column, 10' x 1/8" SS, 15% TCEP on 60/80 Chromosorb P-AW
Control 'Console System
1. Seiscor valve - gas sampling configuration
2. Seiscor valve - backflush configuration
3. ATC timers, Model 3254A346A10PX (2 ea)
4. ACSO solenoid valve. Model 834501 (2 ea)
5. Brook flowmeter, R-2-15-A w/SS float, 0-150 scale
6. Metal Bellows MB-155 pump
7. Female quick-connect, stainless steel
8. Nupro Model 2M stainless steel regulating valve
9. Stainless steel tubing (0.01"ID) for capillary restriotor
10. Miscellaneous stainless steel, copper and Telflon tubing
(1/8" and 1/16")
11. Miscellaneous stainless steel and brass unions, tees, etc.
12. 3ud Classic II control console cabinet, 14" x 19" panel
13. Miscellaneous electrical on-off switches
SHED Bag Sample Acquisition System
1. Sample pump, Thomas Model 917 CA TFE
2. Brooks flowmeter. Model 1555, R-6-15-A, sapphire float, 0-11 1pm
3. Regulating valve, Mupro 4MG, SS
4. Telfon tubing, 1/4" OD x 1/8" ID
5. SS quick connects, male and female
6. Tedlar bag = one cubic foot capacity
7. Miscellaneous nuts, females and assorted unions, tees, etc.
Sample Calculations
It was initially planned to use ethyl alcohol blends in normal calibra-
tion cylinders. During the validation of the calibration technique, it
became apparent that high pressure ethyl alcohol blends were not stable and
other calibration techniques were investigated. Benzene was selected to be
used as the external standard and the relative response to ethyl alcohol was
established. Experiments determined that 1 ppm C (benzene) was equivalent
to 0.05 rag ethanol per cubic foot. Using this relationship, the following
equations were used to determine grains of ethanol per test.
1. General Calculation Equation
ppm C Ethanol = GC area of Ethanol x ppm C Standard (Benzene)
GV area standard (benzene)
B-8
-------
2. Ethanol Evaporative Losses
Ethanol g/test - ppmC (0.050 mg/ppm C ft3) (SHED vol. ft3) (1 g/103mg)
If a test used a 68.3 ppm C benzene standard that gave area counts and
the SHED volume was 1708 ft3, then the following rate would be calculated.
ppm C Ethanol = (3560 area counts, C2HsOH) (68.3 ppm C
(17521 area counts,
ppm C Ethanol = 13.88 ppm C
Ethanol, g/test = ppm C C2H5OH x Response factor x SHED vol.
Ethanol, g/test = 13.88 ppm C x 0.050mg/ppm C ft3 x 1708 ft3 x Ig/lOOOmg
Ethanol, g/test = 1.19 g
B-9
-------
APPENDIX C
MALIBU FTP RESULTS FOR REGULATED AND UNREGULATED
EMISSIONS WITH SEVE" TEST FUELS
-------
TABLE C-l. SUMMARY OF REGULATED EMISSIONS FROM 1978 MALIBU
o
Tc-st
No.
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-5
2-1
2-2
3-1
3-2
4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4
5-1
5-2
5-3
6-1
6-2
6-3
6-4
6-5
6-6
7-1
7-2
7-1
fl-l
II- 2
FTP Emissions P.ates, g/km
Fuel
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM- J73-F
Avornqu
EM-374-F
EM-374-F
Average
EM-375-F
EM- 375 -F
Average
EM-371-F
EM-371-F
KM-371-F
BM-371-F
Average
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
Avoraije
KM-3HO-F
KM-380-F
EM-3BO-F
EM-389-F
EM-3D9-F
EM- 38V- F
Avrraqc
EM-305-F
EM-.180-F
KM- Ill'i- F
AV.T.I.IU
KM- 1U6 -F
KM- JM6-K
Av.
-------
TABLE C-2. INDTVIDUAL HYDROCARBON EMISSIONS FROM 1978 MALIBU
o
UP
Tost
No.
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
1-5
2-1
2-2
3-1
3-2
4-1
4-2
4-3
4-4
5-1
5-2
5-3
6-1
f.-^
6-3
6-4
0-5
6-6
7-1
7-2
7-3
fl-1
fl-2
FueJ
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
Average
EM-374-F
F.M-J74-F
Avrrago
KM-375-F
EM-375-F
Avr-raqn
EH-371-F
EM-37 1-F
EM-371-F
EM-371-F
Avor.v.jr
EM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-37:-F
Average
HM-Wi-F
EM- 3(19- F
EM-3H9-F
t:M-3l)9-F
KM- 3H9-K
KM-JH'J-F
Average-
EM-305-F
KM-3H5-F
EM-3af.-F
Average
EM-3UO-K
nM-3iio-F
AVi-rag<-
Date
11-10-78
11-11-78
11-16-78
11-17-78
11-21-78
11-12-78
11-13-78
11-15-78
11-20-78
11-27-78
11-28-78
12-04-78
12-05-78
11-29-78
11-30-78
12-01-78
5-OR-79
5-09-79
5-10-79
5-22-79
5-23-78
5-24-79
5-14-79
5-15-79
5-25-79
5-16-79
5-17-79
Methane
50.47
51.22
43.25
42.88
40.96
44.30
_46.77
"t'5.54
46.61
iii.?2
44.00
41.34
40.58
41.01
41.31
40.45
39.71
34.98
38.30
64.75
62.26
60.90
52.76
-. f. - —
49.21
57~.9~f]
45.86
45.06
44.00
45.2~4
44.62
45.74
40.18
FTP
Ethylcnc
18.31
23.05
19.45
19.14
19.99
22.00
21.31
21.66
21.19
20.63
20.91
.'1.37
10.44
9.51
10.44
1' .00
9.2C
mi
10.69
12.93
13.67
11.99
12.06
12.18
12. "57
11.56
10.56
10.56
10 . 89
10.94
11 -JJ.
li.13
Individual
Etlinnu
9.67
1O.07
10.32
9.94
10.00
10.48
10_._2J
10 .If
10.1'J
10.19
10.1'J
10.25
9.32
9.63
9.7J
10.07
9.H2
JaOi
10.05
9. 32
8.39
8.64
8.76
2JJ
8.90
9.88
9.38
9.76
9.67
9.51
9.12
9.72
Hydrocarbon 1
AcPtylone
1.75
2.80
2.49
2.55
2.40
2.37
3.09
2.73
3.80
3.48
3.64
2.67
0
0.81
1.16
2.42
2.05
3.85^
2.77
1.60
2.17
1.74
2.11
2.JW
l.'J'J
1.37
1.49
!•-•«!
1.49
i.f.n
i . no
y.74"
Missions 1
Propan^
7.96
0.84
4.78
3.04
4.16
1.78
1.53
1.41
2.98
&JI
1.68
2.17
0.31
i-^?.
l.RO
2.61
0.68
iiSi
2.05
1.43
1.62
3.85
1.68
l^M
1.96
2.73
1.93
iiifi
2.11
2.24
2.05
2.rs"
^atrs, mg/km
Projiy trno
4.37
0.29
4.35
4,35
3.34
4.23
A-J1?.
4.13
3.72
UJ5
3.79
4.23
4.10
3.')1
4.08
3.23
2.55
A-,0-4
3.27
5.22
5.1)3
5.22
4.91
4.72
5.02
4.35
4.16
4_.00
4.17
3.91
I-.7-1!
4 .35
Bonzono
6.80
9.11
6.09
5.B4
-_~_
6.96
5.59
6.53
6~06
8.89
6.JU
7.55
3.90
2.4')
2..J6
2.94
2.11
2.11
2.^2
2.24
7. OB
6.09
5.41
4.04
3...B5.
5729
3.67
5.41
3_._q.
-------
TABLE C-3. ALDEHYDE EMISSIONS FROM 1978 MALIBU
FTP Ald")iyilcs missions Rales, mg/km
Tost
No.
1-1
1-2
1-3
1-4
l-r.
2-1
2-2
3-1
3-2
•1-1
n "-2
1 4-3
" .1-4
') 1
'j-2
b-3
f>-l
(>-;;
6-3
r,-4
f>-'i
f > - fl
7-1
7-2
7-3
0-1
H-2
Fuel
EM-373-F
EM-373-F
KM-373-F
KM-37J-F
KM- 173-F
Aver.nj'.'
KM-374-F
KM-374-F
AV'.-raqe
EM-375-F
EM-.'7'.-F
AVlTiVH'
EM-17J-F
KM- 37 1 -F
KM-371-F
EM-371-F
AviM .l'|'*
\\n-m-v
MM- 3 72 -F
KM- 37 2- F
Avor.'iic?
KM-JIW-F
KM- lll'i-F
KM-35IO-K
KM- 3fl')-F
KM- MW-F
KM- 31V) K
AV"r,T|f
KM--JHj-F
KM-3H1-F
KM- Jllr.-F
/wi'i .up.
KM- !l!l,-F
KM- 1W.-F
AVrT.ltfi"1
Date
11-10-78
11-11-78
11-10-78
11-17-7H
11-21-7H
11-12-7B
11-13-78
11-11-70
11-20-70
11-27-78
11-20-70
J2-04-7H
12-OS-7U
11-2T-7I)
11-30-7U
12-01-7B
fi-yn-71)
5-"'.i-7st
'j-l')-79
C.-22-7M
rj-21-T)
')-3.1-7'J
5-14-79
•i-lS-75
••.-2r.-7')
r,-lf,-7')
r>-17-71)
Form-
l.BO
1.24
0.87
2.11
EsT
1.12
0.21
u.M
2.01
1.37
T:TI
—
0.(>2
1.24
0 . '• 3
1.37
1.IIU
l.'JO
1.72
0
2.11
0.44
0. !•)
0 . 06
O.T.fi
J.OH
1.4')
!.'.'»
l.liH
0
(T.II4
Ac«t-
0.93
0.31
O.OG
O.Ofi
5737
0.09
0
0 . ''M
0 . 1C
0_.J52
b . vi
0
D.ir
O.Oli
0 . !iG
1.06
0
0 .B4
0
0
0
0
n
_
0.62
0.12
1) . 17
0. 12
0
0.1)0
Acetone*
0.31
0
0
0.00
iT.O^J
0.37
0. 11
uT/H
o
n.w>
b . o 3
O.Ofi
o.ot>
o.iic.
0
0. It
O.Of)
oVoiJ
0
0
0
I)
o
0
0.21
0.12
u, M
O.Ofi
0. I'J
fr.T.v
Isobutry-
0
0
0
0
-
(7
0
o
0
n
0
0
.
-
o
0
0
0
0
()
0
0
I)
1)
0
n
.
0
0
0
-
u
0
1)
0
Mi-thyK-thyl
Kotone
0.12
0.12
0
o
oTdtT
0
O.06
oTfu
0 . 00
0._1)G
0 . (If,
0.12
0.13
O.lf
0 . Of)
0.12
0.12
O". 10
O
O
o
o
o
----
r>
a
0
....
n
o
o
o
Croton-
....
rrrz
-----
"—
-----
0
o
0
o.or,
n
o~.o~i
0.06
0.06
.---
0 . Of.
0
0. 12
o.ari
Hnxan-
0.19
0.1'J
0
o.or.
(T.1T
0
0
(Y
O.Ofi
O..V)
O.Oli
0.10
0.12
i).Ir,
J. 12
o. rj
0 . V)
07T7
0
0
0
0
it
iT " ""
0
0
o
0
0
{" " " '
Bon/.frx-
0. 11
O
u
o
(1 . T) H"
n
0
d
0
U... .
0
0
0
0
o
0
0 . 'M
ii'.Ti
0
0
0
.'.17
o.T.f
0.44
0. 17
.....
11.41
0 . 'if,
1 .'If,
o'.Til
T'.t.il
1 . C.f.
l.Hd
ii.') .3
;: . ;">
y. D
.' . •!«
". r.O
1 . -I''
.'.71
J.17
.'.4'i
l).'l')
1 . <•<>
1. 33
.:. II
3. 30
i . 2')
;!".7)2
o
/. 11
0.44
n. ^',
.' .'! \
. - -
1 ."> 1
1.OS
2. 10
i.b\
J.V
1 . 17
r. 'i.i
-------
TABLE C-4. VEHICLF EMISSION RESULTS
VCHICLE NO. u
VEHICLE MODEL ?n CHFV. MALIBU
ENGINE 5.0 LHOS C1D) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
CVW 0 KCr -0 LB3)
BA90M£TEP 719.30 MM HG{?1.11 JN HC)
DRY BULB TEUP. 71.1 CFG CC7».f) DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMHF.R
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?OflN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. n?odN. H?O)
BLOWER INLFT TFMP. DF.G. ctoro. r>
BLOwtR REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW ST0. CU. M£T?ES(SCr)
MFTFR/RANGE/PPM
MFTER/RANGE/PPM
MFTER/RANGE/PPM
O
METER/RANC,E/PCT
MFTER/RANGE/PCT
MpTER/RANGf /PPM
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGPD
CO SAMPLE
CO BCKGRO
CO? SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX HCKGRO
DILUTION FACTOR
HC COMCENTRaTlON PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MAS3 f.RAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMJ/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GHAMJ/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
MOX GRAMg/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION! HY CB L/1 OnKM(MP(J)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP f,FSULT3
HC GWAM3/KM (GRA«,-;/MIL£)
CO CRAMJ/K" (GRAM3/MJLE)
CO? GRAMS/KM fGRAMS/MJLE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IOOKM »?.7)
HOT TRANSIENT
1577.3 (b?.l)
lt??.» (Sh.O)
»0.b (105.0)
)03b3
bl.7 (?177.5)
in.
1.
30.
,
»9,
i.
2b,
•
8/
O/
8/
I/
»/
* /
O/
b/
S
3/
3/
3/
3X
?/ 2
P/
2/
?/
,7b
108
10
721
I
.25
.05
?b
1
gl
11
23
1
78
3
13
100
b7>»
g
,
25
3
?t
.5
.55
HB.45
314 a a a
,
B.
133
.
19,
5.
B ^
b2
»3
.b
55
IS
75
3
.01
13
h9
12
3
.99)
,5b)
7,b)
.8* )
>2B)
,57)
<•»
18
b
,0/ ?/
« 7/ ?/
.b/13/
,2/U/
.B/ 3/ 1.
.!/ 3/ .
,0/ 2X
.b/ 2/
1, 25
1?
20
l.HO
12.5
.71
2.51
2. 52
.11
,»l .
2.2 711
«*1 i
.<«2 12.
.15 3.
If
12
22
1
*"»
05
13
1
IB)
bb)
.b)
bb)
13)
82)
32.
10.
12.
1.
t 3 .
1,
n.
•
t
i.
373
,
lb.
S.
O/
b/
;/
e/
3?
11
1/13/ 93
S/13/
7/
3/
9/
S/
S
1.
19
b
aii
C 1 J
g
i<*
09
,1
to
01
73
2/ 1.
?/ .
i/
?/
.89
23
fl7
R9
.5
.02
.23
.20
( ,
( 1.
( bOO
' *
( 3!
1
93
05
20
1
23)
75)
.2 )
b* )
b9)
5b)
-------
TABLE C-5. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
VEHICLE NO. is
VEHICLE MODEL ?B CHEV MALIBU
ENGINE 5.0 LC305 CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION AS
CVH o KG( -o L8S)
BAROMETER 7ff.f7 MM HG(ai.3i IN HO
DRY RULf) TEMP, ee.8 REG CC73.0 OEG F)
BAG RFSULTS
BAT, NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. MSO(IN.
o
H?,0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. neociN. nao)
RLOWER INLET TEMP. OEG. CCDEG. F)
BLOWER REvoLUTinNS
CVS FLOW 3TO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRO
CO? SA.MPLE
CO? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX 8CKGRO
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METF.R/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METF.R/RANGE/PCT
METF.R/RANGE/PPM
METFR/RANGF/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOx CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAM.1/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION HY C8 L/100KMCMPG)
CALCULATf.O DISTANCE KM (MILES)
PROJECT NO. Il-ff13-001
TEST NO. 8
DATE 11/11/78
TIME
OYNO NO. S
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO.
RUN
TEST HEIGHT 1511
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
GASOLINE EM-373-F
ODOMETER 5B17
KGC 3500 LB9)
8.0 KW< 10.7 HP)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY t»S PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.h GM/KG( B0.1 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0883
COLD TRANSIENT
IbOO.a (b3.0)
ifaa.f (Sb.o)
fa.a (108.0)
10379
bl.1 (aiBb.S)
S.Bb
iif
718
a.ib
aS.f
f .08
57.5f
afff ,b
3.01
STABILIZED
ibno.a (b3.o)
ifea.f (Sb.o)
H?.? (ins.o)
I78n?
lOb.S (37>»S.8)
1.f3
11
B
1.36
ia.8
.13
7.a
a.b?
HOT TRANSIENT
IbOO.a (h3.0)
1'»??.'« (Sb.O)
ta.a (loe.o)
ia.b/ 3/
l.f/ 3/
3b.l/ 3/
.!/ 3/
fB.f/ a/
i.a/ ?/
ab.3/ a/
i.i/ a/
"J
85f
a
a. 11
.Of
8b
1
2f.a/ a/
if.s/ a/
1.1/13/
1.8/13/
77. S/ 3/ J
3.0/ 3/
is. 3/ a/
,b/ a/
2f
10
a
t.»a
.OS
13
1
sa.o/ a/
13. s/ a/
87.0/13/
l.f /13/
fa. i/ a/
i.n/ a/
ao.3/ a/
,f/ a/
3a
13
87
1
1.81
.Of
an
0
7.Of
ao
81
l.Qb
ao.o
.73
S.l*f
aiob.b
a.f 3
.71 ( l.lf)
l.lb ( lb.03)
fJ3.5 ( (.80. 1)
.Sf ( .Bb)
18.83 ( 18.50)
5.78 ( 3.51)
.11
.15
f 35. a
• f 3
IB. bO
.IB;
.af)
700. a)
.70)
ia.bs)
b.15 ( 3.8?)
.13 (
1.0? (
3bb.B (
• fa (
15. 7f (
5.7f (
,ao>
l.bf )
sio. a)
.bB)
If .If )
3.57)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
co CRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
Co? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY C(l L/innKM (MPG)
.Sf ( .31)
8.H3 ( 3.11)
fIS.Rb (bbS.10)
.f5 ( .73)
17.Rb ( 13.17)
-------
VEHICLE NO. 13
VEHICLE MODEL ?B CHFV. MALIRU
ENGINr 5.1! LOOS CIO) V-R
TRANSMISSION A3
CVH n KG( -o LH3)
TABLE C-6. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. 1 RUN
DATE ll/lb/7fl
TIHE
DYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
BAROMFTER 7Hl.q3 MM
DRY BULB TE"P. I?.''
ai.Pl IN HG)
CCKb.n OEG F)
n
BAG RESULTS
MAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
PLOWER INLET P MM. HJOUN. M20)
flLOwEW INLET TEMP. OF.fi. C(nEG. F)
BLOWER HFVOLUIIONS
CVS FLUH STD. CU. ^ETRES(SCF)
HC SAWpLE METER/RANGF/ppM
HC BCKGRO MFfFH/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER.'HANRE/PPI
CD BCK.GRD METFR/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
C(l? RCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLF
NOX BCKGRO
OILUTION FACTOR
Ht CONCENTRATION HPrt
CO CONCFNTRAl ION PPM
CM? CUNCFNTRA I IiiN PCT
NOX CONCIMRA I ION PHM
HC MASS r.HAMS
CO MASS GRAM3
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GKAMS
HC GRAMS/KM CGRAMT./HILE)
CO GRAMTi/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM ( GR A MS /M I LE )
NOX GHAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION Br CH L/ 1 linKM(MPG)
CALCUI.ATFO DISTANCE KM (MILES)
PROJECT -JU. Ij-H»q3-Onl
TEST HEIGHT is i>s)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD B.O K»{ 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-373-F
ODOMETER 5"»33
RELATIVE H'JMIDITY t.2 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 8.fa GM/KGC bO.2 GRAINS/L8)
NOX HUMIU1TV C.F.
COLD
ibon
1 HI 7
H4
TRANSIENT
. j>
.8
mn
(b3.
(57.
(112
0)
")
.11)
STABILIZED
Ibno
IHH7
Ht
103b5
bl
11.
1.
.
H7.
1.
30.
.0
O/
g/
?/
I/
3/
3/
8/
I/
2
(215
3/
3/
2.<»)
110
12
3/ 1012
3/
2/ 2
?/
?/
«/
s.qs
10(1
qi8
.oq
2
.13
.05
31
1
101*
2(1.
12.
20.
.
73.
2.
lb.
•
30.1
b
3.5^
7. 3?
,g
.8
.»
(b3
(57
(11
.0)
.0)
2.0)
17785
.b
7/
?/
HOT THANSIENT
lbno.2
1H* 7.8
H*.*
(b3.
(57.
(112
0)
0)
.0)
1U3SR
(3h13.h) bll.1
2/
Zf
21
13
2/13/ 11
1/1
O/
7/
O/
I/
10
1 ,
15
f
3/
3/
3/
2/
*'
.1)8
1
1R
21
.2
.5b
. 1*
1
1.33
,n»
lb
l
2335.3 2Hb?.2
.
11.
tO 7
.
18.
5.
bl
7b
.8
57
2R
73
3.28
(
( IB
."1)
,qj)
( bSb.2)
(
( 12
( 3
• 12)
. R7)
.5b)
^
.
•»02
,
17.
b.
I
01
35
.5
*b
21
13
,8»
(
(
.151
.%b)
( b»7.b)
(
( i
(
.75)
i.*>7)
3. HI)
2T.1/
15.1/
(2151.1)
2/
2/
2H.5/13/
.3/13/
»1 .I/
l.l/
2b.O/
l.O/
7
1.
25
1
2/ 1
g/
if
*'
.27
lb
22
80
.1
.5b
.5t
21
15
23
0
.flt
.0*
2b
1
2013.1
2
.10
.27
351.8
.*S
15.05
5.72
.71
(
(
.lb)
.H3)
( Sbb.O)
(
( 15
( 3
.77)
.bi)
.5b)
FTP RESULTS
(1C GUAMS/KM (GHAMS
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRiMS/KM ( GRAMS/M ILF )
FUFL CONSUMPTION HI CO L/IUHKM (MPG)
J.70 (
.1?)
Ib.fl1* ( 13.17)
-------
VEHICLE NO. u
VEHICLE MODEL ?B MALIBU
ENGINE s.o LOOS ciD) v.g
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH o KGC -n LBS)
BAROMETER 7»».?z MM HG(z9.3o IN HO>
ORY BULB TEMP, zo.b DEC CCbl.O DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAR NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?OUN. H?O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(OEC. F)
RLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRE3CSCF)
TABLE C-7. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. H RUN
DATE 11/17/78
TIME
DYNO NO. S
CV9 NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
O
CO
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
CO? SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HC
HC
CO
CO
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGr/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY C8 L/100KM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION or CB L/IOOKM (MPG)
PROJECT NO. 11-»»13-001
TEST HEIGHT 1511 K6( 3500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD e.o KW( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-373-F
ODOMETER S1SI
RELATIVE HUMIDITY Jb PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY S.S GM/KG( 31.5 GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.f*.. '.8535
COLO TRANSIENT
IbJS.b (b».0)
M73.Z (58.0)
»3.3 (HO. 0)
bi.o (ziss.b)
11. s/ a/
i.*/ 3/
38. ?/ 3/
3/
us
i*
108
Z
»7.5/ it Z.M
l.Z/ ?/
3S.H/ Z/
Z.S/ Z/
,?1 ( .31)
2.35 ( 3.78)
3<«S.3B (b3b.l7)
.5H ( .87)
17.Ob ( M.")
STABILIZED
IbZS.b (b».0)
1*73.Z (58.0)
13.3 (110.0)
17788
lOf.8 (30Z.4)
80.5/ Z/
1Z.1/ Z/
.7/13/
7b.O/ 3/
Z.I/ I/
JO.I/ Z/
Z.I/ Z/
ZO
1Z
11
1
ZO
Z
HOT TRANSIENT
IbZS.b (bt.O)
1»73.Z (58.0)
13.3 (110.0)
1035?
bl.O (?15t.B)
zb.s/ a/
10.»/ ?/
Zl.8/13/
.1/13/
Zb
10
ZO
1
«1.8/ Z/ 1.83
l.Z/ Z/
3Z.3/ Z/
1.8/ Z/
3?
Z
103
858
Z.ll
37.8
3.b1
bO.18
3.77
.b3
10.5}
HOb.b
.bS
18.15
5.71
( 1.01)
( Ib.lS)
( bSI.Z)
( 1.05)
( IZ.Ib)
( 3.bO)
10
10
1.31
18. »
.58
1.Z7
ZS8b.8
3.15
.01
.ZO
115.8
.51
17.77
b.ZZ
( .15)
( .13)
( bbl.O)
( .8Z)
( llt7)
7.Z1
IB
18
1.80
30.7
.bZ
1.31
Z007.1
3. Ob
.11 (
.Z3 (
3»8.3 (
.53 (
1».10 (
5.7b (
.17)
.37)
SbO.S)
.Bb)
15.71)
3.58)
-------
T46LCC-8. VEHICLE CESSION RESULTS
PPOJECT NO.
VEHICLE NO. n
VEHICLE MODEL 7R THfV MALTBII
ENGINE 5,0 Lfin« CIO) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
CVw 0 KGf -0 LR9)
BAROMfTER 7»"5,?» MM HtUH.SH TN MR)
DRY BULB TEMP. »i.j QFO C(70.n DFR H
B*C RFSULTJ
e»r, »3t.2 1777* 103»7
bl
1*.
t ,
J1,
,
»t>.
1.
31.
1.
.1
I/
*/
O/
I/
B/
I/
I/
b/
e
(21S7.7)
3/ 181
J/ S*
S/ 1?8
s/ e
»/ I. 10
«/ .0*
E/ 32
*/ I
b.na
1 01
873
'.07
10».B
ib,?/
18, 1/
IV. 5/1
l.b/1
75, 1/
I.J/
17. 0/
».»/
1
1.
(3701.1)
e/
?/
)/
3/
3/ 1
I/
z/
?/
,b*
1
u
I»
?b
11
1*
t
.38
.05
17
1
bl.O
32, 0/
Ik.?/
I3.»/1
2,n/i
1», I/
3.S/
25, b/
!.»/
7
1.
(?15».3)
;/
^/
3/
3/
3/ 1
3/
2/
?/
.10
IB
»7
7»
32
lb
51
I
.83
.05
?b
1
30. b 15.7 «»,*
b
S.fH
?. 1»
23U.3
•
in.
»03
•
1».
•'!
<*fn
,1
b7
B2
'.3
57
n3
S)
b)
1)
1)
3.30
l.OB)
1».»1)
bll.O)
.13)
11.05)
».*7)
1
.5b
,H5
1
>(,3
.3?
?570,1 HRI.b
*
.01
.?•»
iib.e
«*7
17.71
b.l*
."»e
(
(
.15)
. 3B)
*
.11
.SB
( bbl.7) 3»h.?
(
( 13
( 1
,7b)
.??)
.BH)
.Hb
I1*. 83
S.75
,b3
(
(
.18)
.13)
( 557.1)
(
( 15
( 3
,7H)
.Hb)
.57)
11. 81)
-------
VEHICLE NO. is
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEV MALIBU
ENGINE s.o nans ciD) v»e
TRANSMISSION *3
CVH o KCC -n LB3)
TABLE C-9. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. 1 RUN
DATE ll/ia/78
TIME
OYNO NO. S
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
BAROMETER 7»i.i7 MM HGCSS.IB IN HO
DRY BULB TEMP, sa.s DEC c(?3.o DES
PROJECT NO. ll-«»»93-OOl
TEST HEIGHT 1S<»1 K6( 3500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 9.0 KM( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-37»-F
ODOMETER 58*1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY S* PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY t.S GM/KO{ bk.7 GRAlNS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .1ba3
O
t
sis RESULTS
BAR NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOHER OIF P MM. H?0(IN.
RLOHER INLET P MM. HPOCIN.
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F>
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRESCSCF)
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
MC
KC
CO
CO
co? SAMPLE MEKR/RANGE/PCT
co?
NOX
HETER/RANGE/PCT
SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
• NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
MC CRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KMCMPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC CRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
co GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
Coa GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CD L/100KM (MPG)
COLD TRANSIENT
is«a.b (ba.7)
lH?3.a (58.0)
•»H.H (lia.O)
10375
fao.e (aitb.7)
ia.s/ 3/ ias
1.3/ 3/ 13
ab.a/ 3/ hoe
.a/ 3/ s
HS.O/ a/ a. 17
1.3/ a/ .05
88. O/ a/ 28
,7/ a/ i
5.18
lit
a. 13
87. H
t.no
HO. an
8371.8
3.07
.70 ( ' ')
7.0H ( ' )
•U».«t C ;)
,5H ( .flfO
is. as ( la.B/.!
S.78 ( 3.55)
STABILIZED
isia.b (ba.
1*73. a (58.
H».H (118
1771B
101. a (3bB
as.1)/ a/
11. 7/ a/
7.3/13/
«1/13/
77. b/ 3/ 1
a.?/ s/
13. o/ a/
.»/ a/
I.*!
13
fa
1.38
ia.b
.77
.73
Zb31.8
a.ta
.ta (
.ta (
7)
0)
.0)
0.9)
ab
is
7
1
• *a
.0*
13
0
.ao)
.1")
»a7.7 ( bBB.<>)
.3^ (
ia. as ( ia
b.17 ( 1
.fa3)
.87)
.8»)
HOT TRANSIENT
is^a.b (ba.7)
l»73.a (58.0)
Ht.H (lia.O)
103b3
bO.7 (al<»3.B)
35. 3/ 8/ 35
IS. If if IS
ab.o/13/ as
.7/13/ 1
»a.o/ a/ i.ai
i.o/ a/ .o»
ao.t/ a/ ai
.3/ a/ o
7. a*
ea
as
LSI
ao.b
.78
l.bl
aois.b
a. 31
.i» ( .aa)
.38 ( .HS)
350.1 ( Sfa3.a)
.HO ( .bH)
If. 18 ( 1!3.71)
S.7b ( 3.58)
.85 ( .HO)
i.sq c a.sb)
"»03.b1 (b>»
-------
VEHICLE NO, 13
VEHICLE MODEL 7s CHEV MALIBU
ENGINE 5.0 LOOS CIO) V»8
TRANSMISSION A)
CVM 0 K6( -0 LB3)
BAROMETER M0.1t MM HG(?1,17 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 OEG C(7»,0 DEO F)
BAC RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H20UN, H20)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?OCIN. H2o)
BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEC. C(OEG. F)
610WER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO'. CU. M£TRE3(3CF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
cc SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
coa SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CO? BCKGRO MfTER/RANGE/PCT
NOX JAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C02 CONCENTRATION PCT
•IOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
10 MASS GRAMS
C02 MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
COc GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MJLE)
NOX GHAMJ/KM (GRAMS/MJLE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/10nKM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM
TABLEC-IO.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
PTPC
TEST NO, I RUN
DATE 11/13/71
TIME
OYNO NO, I
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO, 1
PROJECT NO. 11-»»13-001
TEST WEIGHT 1511 KGl 3SgO LB3)
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD 8.0 KN( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE IM-27H-F
ODOMETER 58b.l
RELATIVE HUMIDITY SI PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 1,3 GM/KG< bs.o GRAINS/LBJ
NOX HUMIDITY C.F,
o
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC CR'MS/KX
CO GRAMS/KM (f.RAMJ/MlLE)
COe ORAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IOOKM (MPG>
COLO TRANSIENT
IbOO.i (bl.O)
(5?,0)
<*z.2 (loe.o)
103hO
bl.O
123
S3b
7
M8
.Ob
21
1
12.3/ 3/
!.•»/ 3/
23.2/ S/
1.1
2/
S.M
111
2.12
28.2
3.12
35.<7
2373.5
3.1*
,bB ( 1.01)
b.lS ( 1.81)
»11.» ( bbl.1)
.5* ( .88)
18.Ob ( 13.02)
5.77 ( 3,51)
.?» ( .38)
i.os ( e.»<>
17.
STABILIZED
(b3.0)
1<*73,I (SB.O)
H8.« (101.0)
1777b
10H.7 (Jblb.8)
27.3/ 2/
Ib.S/ 2/
1H.7/13/
1.3/13/
7b.1/ 3/
3.»/ 3/
13.2/ 2/
,8/ 2/
1.51
13
12
1.3b
12.5
,7b
1,51
27
lb
1
L.n
'l3
1
2.31
.12
• *»
J0.»
.11
,20)
.11)
b7b.<»)
.b2)
17,18 ( 13.01)
b.20 ( I *>S)
HOT TRANSIENT
(SB.O)
(108,0)
bO.1 (2151.1)
«»0.7/ 2/ HI
2H.7/ 2/ 25
H1.2/13/ H7
1.2/13/ 1
H2.8/ it 1,81
1,2/ 2/ ,0»
20,I/ II 21
.§/ 2/ 1
7,07
11
1.85
20.2
,b8
3,08
20b3,0
2.25
.12 ( .11)
,53 ( ,8b)
358.3 ( S7b.S)
.31 ( ,b3)
15.3* ( 15,33)
S.7h ( 3.SB)
( ,b8)
( 13.bg)
-------
TABLEC-I I . VFHICLF EMISSION RESULTS
FT PC
VEHICLE NO. 13
VEHICLE MODEL ?a CHEV MALIBU
ENGINF 5.0 LOOS cio) v-a
TRANSMISSION A3
Gvw n KGC -n
BAROMETER 739. bS MM HG(?9.i? IN HG)
DRY tti;LB FF.MP. n.i DEC c(h?.n »EG
H^OflN. H?0)
BAG RESULTS
RAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MH.
BLOWFH IHLET P MM. H?Q(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. njrs. CCDCG.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
n
SAMPLE
RCHGRQ
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
CO? SAMPLE
CO? flCKGRO
NOX SAMPLE
NOX OCKGHD
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/f-CT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
niLUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NO* CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GHAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GHAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
COP GRAMS/XM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CT L/1<1MKM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMl'031 TF FTP Ht'3U(.TS
HC GHAMS/KM (CiRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/KILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/lOtlKM (MPG)
TEST NO. P
DATE M/11/7R
TIME
OYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
BAG CAIIT MO.
RUN
TEST HEIGHT
ACTUAL WUAD LOAD
GASOLINE F.M-37S-F
OOOME7ER S1H5
PKOJfcCT NC,
KT,(
P. (I
3>,('(l LHS)
h( Id. 7 HP)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ^n PCT
ABSOLUTE MUMIoITY 13.1 GM/KGC "tl.7 GRAIHS/LH)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
COLD TRANSIENT
IbOU.S Cb^.ll)
» 3 . 1 ( 1 1 1 . I) )
0a.b3 (b»7.83)
.55 ( .H«O
17.33 ( 13.S7)
STABILIZED
(b3.o)
1HH7.B (57.n)
H3.<) (11 1.0)
HOT TRANSIENT
Ibno.? (b3.0)
Ii»t7.8 (57.0)
H 3 . 9 ( H 1 . n )
1H .
1.
e7.
.
*7.
1.
31.
1.
3/ 3/
5/ 3/
7/ 3/
I/ V
3/ ?/ i
H/ ?/
fl/ ?,/
s/ e/
s.nfl
1 3D
113
J5
b*5
a
?. 1 3
.os
3?
1
ea.n/ a/
13. 3/ a/
B.5/13/
.3/13/
7b,3/ 3/
3.D/ 3/
is. a/ a/
i.i/ ?/
9.bn
in
eg
13
B
0
1.39
.05
15
1
30
R
IH
13
1
as
.n/ a/
.B/ ?/
.CI/13/
.9/13/
.b/ a/
,3/ ?/
. 9/ a/
.9/ a/
b.95
as
31
9
13
1
1.93
.1)5
ab
1
1
a. n
3D.
H.
1? .
?3?7
3.
.Bfl (
7. HO (
HOb.q (
.bB (
17.97 (
5.7? (
M
7
5B
3b
.H
BB
i .a9)
11 .9])
bf.».7)
1.M9)
1 ^.(19)
3.5b)
1.35
It.?
.bl
.91
?Sflb.3
3.0B
.in (
.15 (
»19.7 ( b75
.51 (
17. 9t ( 13.
h.lb ( 3.
IS)
?t )
.3)
BO)
11)
83)
1
a
?i
.1H
.15
3b7.3
.S5
IS. 711
5.73
.b9
5.1
.BS
.fit
115.0
3.17
( .?3)
r .as)
( 59(). 8)
( . B9)
{ 1 ». 9B )
( 3.5b)
-------
TABLEC-12.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
VEHICLE NO. 13
VEHICLE MODEL 79 CHEV. MALIBU
ENGINE 5.0 LC305 CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH 0 KG( -0 LB3)
BAROMETER 717.78 «M HG(89.11 IN MS)
DRY BULB TEMP, so. b OEG ctfci.o OEG Ft
BAG RESULTS
BAG SUMBER
DESCRIPTION
SLOWER OIF P MM. H80(IN, H?0)
RLOHER INLET P MM. H80(IN. H80)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. CCOEG. F>
RLOHER REVOLUTIONS
CVfl FLOW STO. CU. H£TRE3(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PP*
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
CO 9CKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
O
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? RCKf.wo MCTER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MA33 GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAM3/MRE)
CO GPAM3/KM (GRAMS/HUE)
CO? GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY Cfl L/100KM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM (MPG)
NO. 3 RUN
11/80/78
TEST
DATE
TIME
OYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO.
PROJECT NO. 11-1193-001
TEST WEIGHT ISM KGC 3500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD t.o KW( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-37S-F
ODOMETER S-»77
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 51 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 7.8 GM/KG( 51.7 6RAIN3/L8)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .9127
COLD TRANSIENT
IbOO.i Cb3.0)
1»»7.8 (57. 0)
t3.3 (113.0)
103SB
bl.7 (817'?.'»)
1».0/ 3/ ItO
I.I/ 3/ 11
30. 8/ 3/ 7ei
.!/ 3/ ?
»b.7/ ?/ ?,10
!.»/ ?/ .05
30. O/ Z/ 30
.3/ a/ 0
b.15
131
b78
i. Ob
21.7
t.bb
»8.7f
8333.5
3.?1
.81 ( 1.30)
8.tb ( 13. bl)
«»03.3 ( b»B.<»)
.5b ( .90)
17.89 ( 13.15)
S.7b ( 3.58)
STABILIZED
IbOO.? (bS.O)
1»H7.B (57.0)
»3.3 (110.0)
177b3
105. A (3738.0)
21. I/ ?/ 31
11. 5/ i/ 11
7.7/13/ 7
l.S/13/ 1
7b.B/ 3/ 1.10
Z.8/ 3/ ,0»
13. 9/ i/ 1%
.3/ i/ a
9.53
11
b
1.37
13. b
.bb
.78
8b«b.O
8.58
.11 ( .17)
.18 ( .19)
187.1 ( b87.?.)
.11 ( .fcS)
18.85 ( 18.89)
b.8fl ( 3.85)
HOT TRANSIENT
Ib00.8 (b3.Q)
1117.8 (57.0)
13.3 (110.0)
10350
bl.7 (8177.9)
88. I/ ?/ 88
18. 5/ 8/ 13
ll.b/13/ 11
1.3/13/ 1
18. b/ 8/ 1.88
1.5/ S/ .05
85. B/ i/ 8b
.S/ 8/ 1
7.13
18
10
1.83
es.i
.b3
.b8
80bb.l
8.73
.11 ( .17)
.18 C .19)
357.9 ( 575. 8)
.17 ( .7b)
15.30 ( 15.38)
5.77 ( 3.59)
.85 ( .11)
1.85 ( 8.97)
10?,1? ((.18.b?)
.-". ( .73)
17.3b ( 13.55)
-------
VEHICLE NO, n
VEHICLE MODEL 7R CHEV MALIBU
ENGINE 5.0 LOOS CIO) V«S
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH 0 KG( -0 L8S)
BAROMETER 7*0.9? MM HG(?9.17 IN HG)
DRY HULB TEMP. H.3 OEG C(7*,0 DEC F
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMRF.R
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P wv. H?nriN. H?P)
BLOWER INLET P MM, H?O(IN. nan)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. CCDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW $TO'. CU. MET"ES:o MASS GRAMS
co? MASS r.B4«s
NOX MASS C.RAM3
HC &HAMS/XM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM {r.RAMS/MJLE)
COl GRAMS/KM (r.RAMS/MJLE)
NO* GRAMS/KM fGRAWS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION HY CB L/IOOK"{MPG)
CALCULATFD DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MJLE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRA"S/MJLF)
CO? GRAMj/KM (r.RAMn/MlL£)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAM4/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/KH1KM fMpG)
PROJECT NO. 11-»'»n.7 (21*1.3)
11. S/ ]/ 115
l.l/ 3/ 11
in,*/ 3/ 91.5
.!/ 3/ 2
17, 5/ «/ 2.11
1.3/ ?/ .05
29, 3/ f/ 29
,9/ a/ 1
5.97
lOb
"1*
2.10
28. b
3.71
bl.bO
2338.3
2.83
.bl 1.01)
11.22 18. Ob)
10b,2 bS3.b)
.19 ,79)
18.18 18,9*)
«.7b J.88)
STABILIZED
IbaS.b (bl.O)
1*73.8 (58,0)
13.3 (110.0)
17793
IP*. 3 (3bB3.1)
21. 7/ a/ 22
12. S/ a/ 13
20.S/13/ 20
1.9/13/ 2
75, 8/ 3/ 1,38
3, I/ 3/ ,05
15, B/ a/ Ib
i.ox a/ i
9,bb
10
17
1.31
11.1
.bJ
2,08
2559,7
2,51
.10 .17)
.3* .55)
117,3 b71,5)
.*! ,b7)
17,85 13,18)
fc.l) 3.81)
HOT TRANSIENT
ibes.b (bi.o)
1*73. a (58,0)
13,3 C110.0)
103*8
bo.b (aiii.s)
28. a/ i/ as
u. 9/ a/ la
21,*/13/ 20
,b/13/ 1
11, 9/ a/ 1,8*
1.3/ a/ ,05
21, S/ a/ 21
l.l/ Zt 1
7.27
IB
19
1.80
23. b
.ba
1.3*
1997.1
2.33
,11 ( .17)
.23 ( ,37)
317, a ( 558,7)
,11 ( ,bS)
11,85 ( 15,81)
S.75 ( 3.5B)
,?e ( .35)
Z.SB ( ».1»)
39«!.b7 (b3b.b*)
,1.1 ( ,b^)
17.09 ( 13,7b)
-------
VFHICi.E ML*. 13
VEHtd t Monr.l. 7H CHFV
ENHiNf S.H L(1i'5 CIO) V-8
A3
( -n Ll»S)
BAl"'!!f If* 7»H.1R MM HG(?1.33 TN HR)
URY tMILR TF.»'P. ?S.K OF<; C(?f*.tl DEU F)
BAG XFSUI. IS
MAC. NII-WF.W
trt PC •*!''! ION
I11K P MM. HiVKTN. H?ll)
I"LtT f MM. Mi?(>(IM.
InLfl 7E«P. UF.R. C(HI-G. F)
WFVOLDI lO'-S
TVS FLI)» STO. CU.
I
M
m
TABLF C-l4..VfcHICLE EMISSION PESULTS
FTPC
TFST NO. ? HUN
DATE 11/28/78
TIME
OYNO HO. 5
CVS NO. 7
BAR f.AMT NO. 1
PHOJECI NU. U-»»"»3-Oni
HC S4MPI.F.
HC. HCKT,PO '
CD SA.1PLE HE (
ro WCKBBO »EIEH/RANI;K/PPM
CO? <5AKPIF MflEH/HANi;t/PCT
CU? 4CKr,HP> Mf 1 tR/RANT.F /otT
nu». SAMPt.F. ME feK/RANGf/PPM
NOX HCftGKt) MFlfR/RANGf /PPH
DILUTION FACTOR
MC COuCFN'RAt ION
CM cii"cr»iiw»i ION PPM
co? r.nNCCNiRAi ION per
MUX r.nr.'CeNTWAl ION ^PM
HC MASS
f.o M4S5
rn? MASS GR««S
HC .
tr, GHAMS/KM lf,HAf.s/MlLE)
r.u? r,WAMr,/KH CRRAHS/MILF.)
•HUX (irfAMS/KH CC-HA -IS/MILE)
FUFL Cu'JSI)HPl 10H HY C"
CAi.cuiATM) OiatANCr KM (MILES)
TP Rf.siij.Ts
HC GHAHS/KM ICHAKS/Mtlf )
CM GI«AMS/KM ct.WAMS/Mii.t )
C'l? GRAHS/hM IGRAMS/MILF)
NOX GK«^S/KH ClJKAMS/HIl.£ )
FUFL CUfiSUMPT ION lit CH I/JHHKM (MPCO
TEST WEIGHT. 1511
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
GASOLINE EM-371-F
ODOMETER bO»1
KG( 3500 LBS)
B.Q KK( 10.7 HP)
"F.LATIVE HUMIDITY Ib PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 3.H GM/KG( 23.b GRAlNS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .BOSS
COLO TRANSIENT
IbSl.tl (hS.O)
IHBt). B (SB. 3)
*3.3 (1111.0)
103b7
bl.O (2155.1)
l.bb ( a.bR)
?1R,17 (htn.18)
."»8 ( .77)
17.1H ( 13.73)
STABILIZED
JbSl.O (bS.O)
ItBU.B (58.3)
»3.3 (110.0)
17781
10*.7 (3b11.2)
HOT TRANSIENT
IbSl.O (hS.O)
1HR0.8 (58.3)
t3.3 (110.0)
1U3S1
bl.O (21SV.O)
q^
r.
28.
H?!
1.
3t .
1.
I/
II /
B/
2/
I/
b/
8/
S/
5
b
2.
33
3
»5
7/,
3/
3/
•$/
it Z
g/
g/
2X
.11
11
3b
1?
.b
.11
11
10
b72
5
.lb
.Ob
35
2
11.
in.
5.
2.
75.
2.
IP.
1,
b/
I/
g/
a/
0/13/
5/13/
B/
3/
8/
O/
1
1.
17
3/ 1.
3/ .
2/
2/
.b7
11
3
35
• T
.bH
.31
20
10
5
2
30
Of
11
1
28.
1.
10.
b.
12.
1.
28.
*
P3h5.7 2512,1
7 f
•HI
.
1 8.
5.
3
„
Rb
.3
55
lb
75
.lb
(
( 12
.R1)
.b5)
( bbl.8)
(
( jj
( 3
.88)
.lb)
.57)
•
9
•Mb
•
17.
b.
2
10
U5
.3
Hb
71
23
.81
(
r
lb)
08)
(. bb1.8)
(
( 13.
( 3.
75)
23)
87)
f
•
35»
.
15.
5.
•»/
b/
2/
Zt
5/13/
8/13/
k/
2/
3/
I/
7
1.
27
i/ 1
2/
a/
2/
.13
20
H
8H
.5
.71
.21
28
10
10
7
.88
• P1*
28
1
2053.1
2
If
OS
.8
*5
lb
71
.51
(
(
.20)
.(IB)
{ 570.1)
(
( IS
( 3
.72)
.51)
.bO)
-------
TABLE OI5.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
VEHICLE NO. u
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEV HALIBU
ENGINE 5.0 LC30S CID) V-H
TRANSMISSION AS
GVH 0 KG( -0 LBS)
itR 7H0.12 MM HGC21.17 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP, 22.8 DEC c(73.o DEC F>
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?OUN. H?O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC, C(DEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CV3 FLOH STD. CU. METRE-(SCF)
O
cr>
SAMPLE
BCKGRO
SAMPLE
BCKGSD
CO? SAMPLE
COe BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRD
HC
HC
CO
CO
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MUSS GRAMS
CO MA33 GRAMS
CO? MAS3 GRAM3
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/inOKM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM (MPG)
TEST NO. 3
DATE 12/ H/78
TIME
DYNO NO. S
CVS NO.
RUN
PROJECT NO. 11-H413-OI11
TEST WEIGHT 1511 KG( 3500 LBS)
ACTUAL RQAO LOAD B.O Kw( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-371-F
ODOMETER b!33
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY !•» PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 2.» GM/KGC i?.o GRAINS/LB)
NOX ftu
COLO TRANSIENT
lb2S.b CbH.O)
1*73.2 (56.0)
H2.2 (108.0)
103bt
bO.1 (815?.5)
.?0 ( .3?)
l.bb ( ?.b7)
3Hb.?7 (b?1.51)
,»7 ( .75)
Ib.b? ( 1H.1S)
STABILIZED
lb2S.b (bt.O)
l»73.2 (58.0)
t?.? (108.0)
177<"»
104.b
HOT TRANSIENT
IbZS.b (b<».a)
If73.? (58.0)
'4?.? (10R.O)
103bO
bO.t (2151.5)
1
g7
f b
1
3V
1
9'f
.I/
.a/
.fa/
«2/
.5/
.?/
.O/
b
3/
3/
3/
3/
2/ 2
2/
?/
2/
.2b
11
11
1
fat?
If
.07
.05
35
1
81.
12.
12.
S.
75.
3.
IB.
•
»/
O/
2/
2/
1/13/
b/13/
*/
f /
B/
I/
1
b07
2.
33
3
H3
03
.1
.21
.01
22b0.1
7
31
17
S
3
.Sb
.51
».l
.5»
.fO
.73
.10
(
( 12
C b3
( 13
( 3
.10)
.01)
f . 1 )
.87)
.52)
.Sb)
.
,
f 12
.
17.
b.
1.
18
3/ 1.
3/ .
?/
2/
.72
11
7
33
.0
.fat
.87
21
12
12
S
37
OS
11
1
28.
13.
12.
3.
13.
2.
27.
*
2Sf 3.0
2
10
1*
,f
f fa
b2
17
.83
( •
C •
( bb3
C •
( 13.
( 3.
17)
23)
.5)
7f)
35)
83)
f
.
331
*
It.
S.
7/
S/
2/
2/
1/13/
3/13/
3/
I/
8/
fa/
7
1.
27
3/ 1.
3/ .
2/
2^
.bS
17
8
71
.3
.t.0
.bO
21
13
12
3
75
of
28
1
HOb.f
2
10
10
.3
13
Ib
7b
.50
C i
\ •
( 533
\ •
( Ib.
( 3.
17)
17)
.0)
70)
bl)
58)
c-r*
.7851'
-------
VEHICLE NO. H
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEV
ENGINE 5.0 L(30
-------
VEHICLE NO. 13
VEHICLE MODEL 7fl CHEV. MALIBU
ENGINE s.n LOOS cto) v-s
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH it KG( -n i B3)
BAROMFTFR 7HO.lb MM HG(?1.1H JN HG)
DRV HiJLR TEMP. ?H.» DEG C(7b.O DEC F)
BAG RFSULTS
BAR NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLHWFR OIF P MM. HaOCIN. H?0)
BLOHFR INLET P MM. H?OCIN. H,?O)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEG. CCDEG. F)
BLOHFR REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRFS(SCF)
TABLE C-|?.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. i HUN
DATE ll/ai/78
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY Pb PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 5.1 GM/KT,(
HC
HC
CO
ro
o
SAMPLE
RCKGRO
SAMPLE
RCKGRD
CO? SAMPLE
CD? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRO
METFR/RANGE/PPM
METFR/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METFR/RANGE/PCT
MFTER/RANGE/acT
METFH/RANGE/I'PM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
rO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GWAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
Co r,RAHS/KM (GRAMS/MRf!)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CF) L/inrtKM(MPG)
CALCUlATfO 013TANP.F KM (MRES)
COMPOSITE FTP HE8ULT3
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO RRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MII.F)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILf)
NOX GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILF)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY Cfl L/lf1"KM (MPG)
PROJECT NO.
TEST WEIGHT 15
-------
o
VEHICLE NO. 13
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEV. MALIRU
ENGINF 5.0 LO05 CIO) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW I) KG( -0 LHS)
BAROMFTER 731.b5 MM MG(?9.ia IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.q OE6 C(75.o DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
RAP, NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
RLOWER OIF P MM. HaOClN. H?ni
RLOHF.R IHLET P MM. H?nciN. H?O)
INLET TFMP. OEG. C(OFG. F)
HEVOLUTIONS
cvs FLOW STO. cu. MFTRESOCF)
HC SAMpLE METER/RANGE/PPM
MC ncKRRo METFR/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE MfTFR/RAwGE/PPM
co HCKGfo METFR/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE MeTFR/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGKO METF.R/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE MF.TFR/RANGE/PPM
NOX HCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CnNO'NTSATIOH PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAM3
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM CGRAMS/MILF)
CO GHAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GHAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION RY CB L/innKM(HPG)
CALCULATEO DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
MC GRAMS/KM (GHAM3/MH.F)
CO GRAMfl/KM
co? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION 8Y CR L/indKM (MPG)
TABLE C-IS.VF.HICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. Z RUN
DATE 11/30/70
TIME
OYNO NO. *
CV3 NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
PROJECT NO. n-Him-nnj
TE3T WEIGHT 1S"U KR( 3500 LRS)
ACTUAL ROAD LO*D B.o KM( in.7 HP)
GASOLINE EM-37S-F
ODOMETER bO<)2
RELATIVE HUMIDITY .31 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 5.1 GM/KGC "U.a GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY c.F.
COLO TRANSIENT
lb?5.h (SH.O)
1HH7.R (57.0)
H3.3 (llll.O)
STABILIZED
IbPS.b (hH.O)
IHH7.8 (57.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
1779B
133
558
i
?.13
.05
33
1
bO.8
13.3/ 3/
P.?/ 3/
e».i/ 3/
.I/ V
l.H/ ?/
33.I/ 3/
l.l/ ?/
b.ll
1 15
?..OR
3?.?
H.O?
37.31
331H.3
3.23
.70 ( 1.13)
b.50 ( 10.H7;
HOH.? ( b5li.3)
.5b ( ."tl)
17.78 ( 13.?3)
B.7H ( 3.5b)
.3? C .lb)
l.lfl ( ?.?l)
^7.OH (63B.83)
.HH C .71)
17.07 ( 13.70)
Hl.b/ 2/
S^.B/ ?/
P.5/13/
.•»/13/
7b.S/ 3/
^.'^/ 3/
l.l/
ne
HO
2
1
.HO
.OH
15
1
I.Sb
b
HOT TRANSIENT
1-»»7.B (57.0)
«»3.3 (110. 0)
10355
bO.7 (?U5.b)
31
1H
5
0
i/ e/ I.HS
39.5/ e/
13.a/ ?/
1.8/13/
1.3/
?H.fl/
l.l/
.05
7.;
1.
1H
?
Ob
03
.0
HO
89
10
%
3b
.*
.3b
. J q
b.ll
.Hf)
( .09)
( .05)
( b7H .2)
( .bS)
t 13.15)
( 3.B5)
H
1.81
23.9
.•<7
.30
J013.8
e.sq
.17 ( .?7)
.05 ( .01)
350.1 ( Sb3.3)
.tS ( .b?)
It. 97 ( 15.75)
5.75 ( 3.57)
-------
VEHICLE NO. 13
VEHICLE MODEL 78 CHEV MALIBU
ENGINE s.o LOOS ciO) v-a
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW 0 KG( -0 LBS)
BAROMETER 738.BS MM HGC21.0S IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. 23.3 DEG C(7H.O DEG F)
BAC RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
DLOWER OIF P MM. HeOCIN. HJO)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HJOCIN. H20)
8LOHER INLET T£M°. OEG. C(0£G. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOH STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
TABLE C-I9.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. 3 RUN
DATE la/ 1/78
TIME
DYNO NO. S
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
PROJECT NO. ll-»»93-001
HC
HC
CO
CO
o
ro
c
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
COf SAMPLE
CO* BCKGRD
NOX SIMPLE
NUX 8CKGRO
METER/RANGE/PPH
METER/RANGE/FPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METEK/RANGE/PPM
METER/RAKGE/PCT
METER/RaUGE/PCT
METEP./RANUE/PPM
METER/RANCE/Pf'K
DILUTION FAC1UR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM C GRAittVMILE)
Co GRAMS/KM CGRAMS/MII ~.)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAM.VN d ';)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAM.'/HILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION Bv C8 L/100*M(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
COe GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM (MPG)
TEST HEIGHT 1591
ACTUAL ROAD LO*D
GASOLINE EM-373-F
ODOMETER b007
KG( 3SOO LBS)
8.0 KM( 1C.7 HP)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 37 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY b.7 GM/KGC »7.8 GRAINS/L8)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .BB'JS
COLD TRANSIENT
Ibas.b (bH.o)
1H73.B (58.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
103b3
faO.S (2138.0)
13. 3/ 3/ 133
i.a/ 3/ IB
8H. I/ 3/ 558
.!/ 3/ a
vb.s/ a/ e.oi
1.3/ B/ .05
33. B/ a/ 33
.'.s/ a/ i
b.aa
123
SB7
B.OS
3a.i
H.ai
37.13
Jgb1,9
3.ai
.75 ( 1 -:.ii)
b.HS ( iO.He)
31b.l ( b37.1)
.57 ( .It"
17. HH ( 13. HI)
5.73 ( 3.Sb)
STABILIZED
IbBS.b (bH.O)
1H73.B (58.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
17717
10H.O (3b71.b)
av.7/ a/ as
11. b/ a/ IB
S.H/13/ S
.1/13/ 0
7b.a/ 3/ 1.31
a. i/ 3/ .OH
is. a/ a/ ib
I.*/ a/ a
i.bi
1H
5
1.35
1H.1
.Bb
. bl'
ZS7B.7
.a.HB
.IH ( .aa)
.10 ( .lb)
tlH.7 ( fab7.a)
.HO ( .bH)
17.72 ( 13.87)
b.BO ( 3.8b)
HOT TRANSIENT
IbBS.b (bH.O)
1H73.2 (58,0)
H3.3 (110.0)
10358
bO.S (B13b.S)
33. if a/ 33
10. 3/ a/ 10
b.8/13/ 7
.1/13/ 0
HI.*/ a/ 1.81
l.H/ a/ .05
an.b/ a/ , as
i.s/ a/ a
7.38
BH
b
1.77
B3.0
.8H
,HH
llbO.l
a.3b
.15 ( .2H)
.oa ( .ia)
331.8 ( SHS.8)
.HI ( .bb)
1H.50 ( Ib.BB)
5.78 ( 3.SS)
.27 ( .»3>
l.tl ( ^.^7)
390.OS (bZ7.bb)
.»•» C .70)
lb.78 ( lf.0!)
-------
VF.HICLE NO. 13
VEHICLE MOOFL -II CHEV MALIBU
ENGINE *.U L(30S CIO) V-B
T»ANSMISSION AS
GVW n KH( -n LBS)
BAPOMfTER 73*. 31 MM 'riG(8B.11 IN HG)
DRY BULB IEMP. 2i.a DEC, c(7?.n DEC
TABLE C-20.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. 1 RUN
DATE S/ 8/71
TIMF
DYNO NO, 5
BAG
RAG
BLOWER Off P «M. Hj»(ifIN. HjO)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?OUN. H?O)
BLOwER INLET TF.MP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
9LOWFR Rf VOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CL'. METRE?(SCF)
SAMPLE
BCKf.RD
SAMPLE
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO? SAMPLE
CO? BCKGKO
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGP-D
METFR/RANGE/PPM
Mt TFR/RANI;E /PPM
METF.R/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
MEIFR/RANGE/PCT
MFTFR/RANGE/PCT
MF.
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCFNTRA1ION PPM
CO CONCF.NTRAI ION PPM
CC'? CONCENTHATION PCT
NOX co^lCF^T«ATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
Co MASS GR'.wS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
Co GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NTX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CH L/innKM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO CWAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILF)
CC? GKAMS/KM (GRAM.S/MILF)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GPAMS/MIl F.)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/lnOKM (MPG)
.83 (
.ni, (
CVS NO.
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY bi PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 18.0 GM/KG( 83.•»
.37)
b.53)
.b?)
PROJECT NO. ll-'»'»<)3-Onl
TEST WEIGHT
ACTUAL RO*D LOAD
GASOLENE tM-3fl<)-F
ODOMETER b228
KC( asoo LBS)
8.0 Kw( JO. 7 HP)
MOX HUMioirr C.F. i.o»3s
COLD TRANSIENT
Ib85
1447
43
bO
18.
l!
51.
.
»1.
1 .
80.
1.
.b
.8
.3
in
.8
H/
7/
I/
I/
I/
V
o/
3/
S
1
1 3
P.
18
1
17
84b
(bH.O)
(57.0)
(iin.p)
3bn
(8187.0)
3/ 184
3/ 17
3/ 1484
3/ 8
8/ 8.88
8/ .05
8/ 80
?/ 1
.58
10
84
84
.1
.B8
.Ob
R.4
STABILIZED
lb?5
1*47
43
103
87.
17.
37.
1.
83.
3.
18.
•
• 6 (bt .
.8 (57.
.3 (110
17713
.* (3bS
B/ 8/
4/ 8/
5/13/
1/13/
O/ 3/ 1
3/ 3/
I/ 8/
b/ 8/
8.71
18
33
1.41
1Kb
.7*
3.1*
8Blb.5
o)
0)
.n)
8.H)
88
17
35
1
.53
.05
18
1
HOT TRANSIENT
lfa8S.b (bf.
1H17.B (57.
H3.3 (110
10340
bO.l (818
33. 7/ 8/
lb.1/ 8/
83.B/13/
.3/13/
»5.0/ 8/ 8
I.8/ 3/
lfl.3/ 8/
.S/ i?/
b.bS
80
78
1.17
17.1
.fal
5.H8
Blbb.O
0)
0)
• U)
3H
Ib
8H
0
.01
.OH
IB
1
.bb
Ib. 7n
484.7
. 31
11.33
S.Bl
( I. Oh)
( 8b.87)
( bB3. 3)
( .b3)
( 18.17)
( 3.bl)
.18 (
.h3 (
»53.b (
.38 (
11. H8 (
h.81 (
.11)
1.08)
781.8)
.b8)
»
-------
VEHICLE NO. 13
VEHICLE HOOEL 7? CHEV MAUBU
EMGINF 5.0 L(305 CIO) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW o KG( -n LBS)
BAROMFTER 733.30 MM HP(?H.H7 IN HG)
DRY BULB mtp. 23.1 DEC C(75.n DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
RAT. NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
PCOMER OIF P M
BLOHEH INLET P
TABLEC-21.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST 'NO. I RUN
OATE 5/ 1/71
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
O
I
K>
M
. H?0(IN. H?0)
MM. H80(IN. H20)
BLOWER INIET TEHP. PEG. C(OEG. F)
Pl.OWF.R REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMpLE M£1ER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRO MFIFR/RANRE/PPM
fp SAMPLE MFTER/HANGF/PP"
co BCKGRO MFTFR/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE MFTFR/RANGE/PCT
CP? RCKGRD MFTER/RANGF/PCT
NPX SAMPLE Mf fFR/RANGF./PPM
NC'X BCKHPD MFTFR/RANGE/PPM
01LU1ION FACUIW
HC CONCENTRA1 ION PPM
rn roNCRNTRAi IPN PPM
CO? CONCENTRAl ION PCT
N PPM
Hf MASS GRAMS
Cn MASS GRAMS
cn,> MASS GRAMS
N.UX MASS GRANS
HC GRAMS/KM t GRAMS/MILE)
Co GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GHAH5/KM (GSAMS/MILF)
NPX GRAMS/KM (GkAMS/MRF)
FIIFL CONSUMPTION' BY CH L/)nOKMCMPG)
CA|.CUL*TED DISTANCE KM (KlLfS)
COMPOSITE FTP WF.SULIS
HC CRAMS/KM (HHAMS/MILF)
co CRAMO/KM (GRAMS/MILF)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MUF)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MJ1.F)
FDFL CONSUMPTION BY CH L/innKM CMPG)
.?t
cvs NO.
PROJECT hJ. U-'»'»<)3-001
TEST WEIGHT issi KCC 3500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD e.o KM( 10.7 HP)
CA30UINE fcM-38S-F
ODOMETER
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 70 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 13.5 CM/KC( *<*.?
NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
i
COLD TRANSIENT
IbOO.e (h3.0)
I»t7.8 (57.01
t3.3 cun.n)
J03SS
.38)
STABILIZED
lbDO.2 (b3.0)
I'M?,8 (57.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
17BOS
103.S ObSH.fl)
HOT TRANSIENT
1»"«7.8 (57.0)
H3.3 (110.0)
103S1*
12.
i.
5b.
f
SO.
1.
i!
I/
O/
I/
I/
b/
t>/
SX
3X
<;
3/
3/
3/ I
3/
2/ 8
a/
g/
if
.•»•»
121
SO
m
a
.32
.Ob
11
1
as.
IB.
'•o.
1.
ea.
3.
12.
•
I/
I/
»/l
H/l
3/
O/
a/
8/
8
113
132?
?.
18
3
1?
27
.»
.11
t,q
aSOa.n
.
15.
•»30
m
11.
S.
2
b7
IS
.7
to
i1*
81
.31*
( !
( as
( bl
(
( la
( 3
.08)
.b7)
2.1)
.bS)
.OH)
.bl)
*
.
f»h
B
11.
b.
1.
11
H
a/
ax
3/
3/
3/ 1.
3/ .
a/
a/
.7-*
11
35
tB
.5
.b8
.33
as
11
38
1
sa
OS
la
i
*1 .
18.
71.
7/
3/
a/
ax
5/ie/
.s/ia/
**5.
1.
Ib.
•
OX
a/
b/
B/
b
ax
ax
2X
ax
.bl
2b
1 2
18
183
1
a. ui
.OH
17
1
171
2718.5
2
11
b7
.7
to
12
27
.51
(
( 1«
( 718
( .
( 12.
( 3.
17)
01)
.7)
bt)
30)
8
-------
VFHICLE NT. is
VtHICLE Mt)0f.l 7H CHfV MALIHl)
ENGINF s.ii : pus ciD) v-n
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH II Kti( -I) LHS)
BARO«FTER 73-*. 31 MM "G(es.«i IN HG>
DRr HHU8 Tf.MP. 3?.R OEG C171.0 DEO
BAG KCSULTS
hAC- NtllBCR
TABLE c-22.VFHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. a RUN
DATE 5/10/71
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
PAG CART NO. 1
OIF P MM. H;0(IN.
IHLF' >• MM. H?0(IN. Hi>0)
If;LET tEMP. Off-. C(DEB. F)
{•LOWER RFVOUJTIOM"
(V«, FLOh STf). CU. MEIPtSfSCF)
O
Ul
HC
CO
CO
CO?
CO?
S*MP(.E
BCHC.RO
3A.-IPLC
1EUR/R*N(JF/PPM
MFIFM/RANGE/PCT
HE7F.K ..'RANGE/PCT
! E METER/RANGE/PPM
N FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION P?M
CO CONCfNTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
MIX
HC M»S:; GRAMS
en MASS r,«*^s
CO? MASS GHA1S
NOX MASS GWAMS
HC RWAMK/KM
Co GR«M<;/KM (GFJAMS/M II.F. j
COa GRAMS/KM (GHAMS/MILE)
NDX GRAMS/KM i&MAMS/MILE)
FUEL CUNSUMPrinN BY CH L/lnnKM(MPG)
CALCULATr.O DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITf FTP KF.SHLTS
MC URAMS/KM (^RAMS/MILD
CO GRAMS/KM (r.RAKS/MII.H)
CO? GRAMfl/Kfl (PRAMS/MIlF)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MHF.)
PROJECT NO.
TEST HEIGHT 1511 KC< 3500 LBS)
ACTUAL RQAU LO*D 8.0 KM( 10.7 HP)
GASOLINE fcM-381-F
OOOMETtR
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 51 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY S.b GM/KG( b7.5 6RAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .1bS8
COLD TRANSIENT
lbOil.2 (h3.0)
;HH7.8 (57. (1)
"3.3 (llll.O)
10358
bn.3 (?;sn.i)
11. i/ 3/ 112
2.0/ 3/ 20
53, 5/ 3/ 1321
.!/ 3/ 2
5
iH.q? ( 2H.ni)
H32.1 ( bib. 5)
.3D ( .bl)
Jl.Sb ( 12.03)
5. BO < 3.bl)
STABILIZED
Lbnu.2 (b3.tj)
1HH7.B (57. d)
H3.3 (110. 0)
17787
103.5 (3b5b.7)
28. 3/ 2/ 28
18. 3/ 2/ IB
H2.7/13/ HO
1.3/13/ 1
82. 2/ 3/ 1.52
2. 1/ 3/ .OH
l?.0/ 2/ 12
.I/ 2/ 1
8.BU
12
37
1.H8
11.2
.72
H.5?
27S8.b
2.1H
.12 ( .11)
.73 ( 1.17)
HHI.b ( 723. H)
.3H ( .55)
11.25 ( 12.22)
b.22 ( 3.87)
HOT TRANSIENT
lbon.2 (b3.U)
1HH7.8 (57.0)
H3.3 (110. U)
103b1
bO.H (2131.1)
Hb.1/ 2/ H7
31. S/ 2/ 31
77.B/12/ ' I'l
,8/iS/ 1
HS.*/ 2/ 2.03
1.3/ 2/ .OS
Ib.B/ 2/ 17
.•»/ 2/ 1
b.SH
20
Ib7
1.11
ib.n
.70
11.77
211b.S
1.71
.12 ( .20)
2.03 ( 3.2?)
378.8 ( bOl.S)
.31 ( .50)
lb.32 ( 1H.H1)
S.BO ( B.oO)
.21 (
.31)
FUFL CDNSUMPF KIN HY
I./JOIIKH (MPG;
1»2b.b7 CbBb.S2)
.3H ( .55)
IB. 51 ( 12.7J )
-------
TABLEC-23. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
VEHICLE HID. 13
VEHICLE MODEL ?•» CHEV. MALIRU
ENGINE 5.0 LOOS CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH U KG( -0 LRS)
BAROMETtR 738.38 MM HG(?"..07 IN HG)
DRY RULil TEMP. ZS.f OEG C(73.n DEC F)
BAG
BAC NUMBER
.DESCRIPTION
BLOWER Olr P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?0(IN. HPr
BLOWER INLET TFMP. DEC. C(DEG.
PLCJWER RCVOLUTlflNS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRFSCSCF)
O
to
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO?
SAMPLE
BCKGRD
SAMPLE
8CKGRD
SAMPLE
CO? BCKGSD
NOX S«KPL£
NOX 6CKGKD
MEIER/RANGE/HPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METFR/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
ME TFR/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CPMCi.'N'RATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAM3
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMT./KM (GRAMS/MILF)
Co GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
COJ GUAM'S/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
N-U GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB I/InOKM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MHE)
CO GRAMS/KM (CfiAMS/MJlr.)
COt G«AMS/KM (GRAMS/MILF)
NOX CRAMS/KM (GMAMS/MRE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IHOKM
TEST NO.
DATE
TIME
OYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO.
RUN
PHOJECT NO.
TEST WEIGHT issi KC(
*CTU*L R0*0 L0*0 8.0
5ASOLINE tM-3BS-F
ODOMETER b3S7
3soo
X( 10.7 MP)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY bi PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.1 GM/KGC 7b.b GRAINS/IS)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.HU78
1
COLD TRANSIENT
B (57.0)
3 (lin.n)
1033B
( ,3R)
( H.b7)
STABILIZED
IbJS.b (b-».0)
(57. D)
.3 (110. n)
17773
lllH.O (3b73.«O
»3.
HOT TRANSItNl
1»»7.B (57. U)
••3.3 (110. U)
1U31*!
SO.S (?!37.b)
11.
1.
3/
S/
3/ 113
3/
is
H?,3/ 3/ 1015
t
Hfl.
1.
a'» .
i.
I/
7/
S/
O/
5X
a
a
3/
a/ a.
a/ .
s/
:/
5.71
101
950
.lb
a. 8
1.51
i
ai
OS
an
a
as
is
38
1
79
3
13
1
bb.89
23S7.7
m
11.
H1H
.
1".
5.
bi
57
.5
tb
55
78
a.bs
t
( IB.
( bb7
( .
( ia.
( 3.
9S)
bl)
.0)
7*f )
bfl)
S"»)
H3
IB
b
.a/
• ™ '
• "/ 4
a/
a/
3/
.1/13/
.!/
.O/
.b/
.3/
q
1.
1?
H
3/ 1
3/
a/
a/
.an
la
3H
H 1
.H
.?a
.13
?b
15
37
1
.H5
.05
1H
1
Hl.S/
IS. I/
a/
a/
SH.8/13/
J .3/13/
HH.n/
i.i/
19. S/
.B/
I
b
•
a/ i.
a/ .
a/
a/
.8H
a9
H8
9a
HI
15
sa
i
95
U4
19
1
18.8
afaRb.a
a
.ia
.bb
J.b
.HO
.H8
.H9
(
( J
( bS
(
( 1?
{ 3
.19)
.07)
H.H)
. bH )
. 7 j)
IB?)
1
3
.no
.HI
aian.s
.17
.59
3hh. 7
.38
IS. 71
5.80
e
.ao
(
( .
( SSU
( •
( 1H.
( 3.
28)
95)
.0)
b 1 )
97)
bO)
17.71 ( 13.37)
-------
TtrtUF.C-24. VEHICLE EMISSION RtfULTR
I 1-ltMl-i'iil
VEHICLE NO. n
VEHICLE MODCL -n cnrv MALIFUI
ENGINE 5.1) L(3fl5 CID1 V-R
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW (I «.(',( -II LHS)
BARCIMCTER 7tl.93 MM MG(?1.t'l I" MG)
DRY BULK TEMP. PM
C'l CDNCr.NTRATION PPM
C0,i CONClNfUAl ION Pt T
NHX CONCCSfHAl ION PPM
HC MASS
CD MAST. GRAMS
CO? MA3S IJSAMS
NOX MASS i;RAM5
HC CMAMS/KM (RRAMS/MILD
CO? GRAMS/KH (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GHAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUFL CHNSUMP1 ION HY CH L/ I nMKM(MPG)
CALCUlATtO DiSlANCt. KM (M^L^S)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KH (C.RAMS/MII.f;)
CO GKAMS/KM ((.RAMS/MJLF)
C'V GRAfin/KM {(iWAMS/Mfl F)
NDX l;HAMy/
FUFL CHNSI."
TEST NO. 5 HUN
DATE S/PJ/79
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 55 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY m.t GM/KG( 7?.i c
i ?
COLU TRANSIENT JTABILIZEO
IbS
11 fl f f U 111
tsis (no. n)
10353
bti.7 ( e 1 1 3 . b )
n
i
3b
t8
1
25
i
«i
.o/ a/ no
.t/ i/ it
.b/ 3/ 8b7
. t/ 3/ S
.8/ B/ *.?!
.t/ 8/ ,n5
.q/ ?/ Jb
.I/ i/ 1
5. HI
SH
Bll?
J.I7
et.B
i.tt
S '.lit
etis.o
?.«?
,5H ( . 9h)
.(it C IS.St)
tlb.8 ( h70.b)
1H
5
?I?7 ( 3!
1 t . 1R (bbb.
. 1 1 (
17. H? ( 13.
.t^C .71)
.53 ( 1?.7U'<
.7<< ( 3.bO)
81)
1 1 )
b7)
lb)
IhSl.ll
t3.3
17
lOt. 3
at. i/
it.s/
(b5.l|)
( 1 111 . n •)
78"<
(3bH3.ll)
e/ ?t
?/ It
an.b/13/ tii
7t.7/
e. ?/
13. 7/
1. 1/
4
1.
1?
?
e?e
*
. n
. 35
t 3fl . 7
.tn
IS. 7b
b.£l
3/ 1
3/ l.tb
3/ .Ut
Z/ It
j)
-------
Reproduced (rom j^W?;
'• %£l
best available copy.
VF-HCU Ml'.
VFHJCI f ""I'll 1.
KN:r, JNE i,.n i <
(Jvx
-II f.KI v "Al U.) .
rv
LiV
'r:«
' 111
IT
i'G
'it•'* I '.1.1 | I' Ml.. •(,• H | I-. •'.
I-..TU t' | i | U --1". II >-. l.( I" i
• 41 11 <:l v M| U I M)'i:''
: FIJI-.- SID. r.u. '. i- i •'i '.(( M.i
SAMPI r >ir n-p/nAvr.i /p
HC->fi"i> '•'F If K/l- ft'ji;l /I-
Sni'M.>- »'F H rf/ufi'n.F/i!
»l >.:' o HI- I n'/i- vir-f /i-
•t I j w/u A-i(;r/i> i
'i IF H/nA--:i;r./i'
itr •>..'. •, •*»• IF R/i:ft-,i,v/r
-11 |. < : >" M: T i ><
( ,.,.,.-1 ,, i j., i | ,,,. ,.,..,,,
C"-".>' .'. !'.•
pvir' Mt'Al ion I'M
C n-ir.l *. I ''A I I (]»• 1't'n
K )
IT f.ll Af,'!/.«'• ( i,HA'-'./'l I I I I
i n I,;,-A" -, /*•• (r,KA"s /:-!t.r j
i f,j i.;v.i-.:-./n-- (f.KAxs/" n r i
•••"'I. r" ..'.!;• .->] t f|\, ,< ,-.< l/|ii.i»W(
r «i c Dl /. 'F r. nsiAM't r * f'Mi.i ;)
•iri ~, | I f t TH Hf ^111 I s
IT l.l-'A-S/RI ((.H«''.'!/«Ml
•IC'X '.'!.\ is/n'-. ((.» A-" '/..in
F')» I r. if.'.ii"P I I I;N t't r n
1 A«|.K C-25. VMMCl.e tl'l SSI ON HSL'lTS
U.ST NC. h HUN
UATf. S/HH/;1*
TIMf
DVNii ^4(l. i.
OS HI). 7
HAI; CAKi Nd. 1
llfl.ATlvK UllHIUIlY hll Pl.T
AIMH.t'lt MIIHIIHTY in. II GM/KC( M.7
1 k>.
r'H n fAusitNi SIARILI/FH
Ihr'S.I, ((, t.ll) I^PS.b (hH.(l)
M17.t! (S7.IO !"»»?. S (S7.ll)
'• 3. < ( \ l".ll) "3.3 ( 1 1". II,
IHViH 17?'1S
M.3 (^IsJ.b) InS.S ('71h.a1
11 . ?/ 3/ 113 £3.t/ a/ ?3
1 . ? / S / l^1 J S . S / ? / 13
jH.H/ 3/ M?3 ^.rVlS/ M
.)/:•!/ ? f.t/1.3/ ?
ti:.n/ ?/ ?.?| ^P.n/ 3/ i . * *
\ .? / }J .nt ?.s/ i/ .ill
Pfl.ll/ ?/ PR l«,.l/r?/ IS
l.'l/?/ ? 1 . S / ? / ?
S.7S- 'l.?5
I'll 1)
Rht h
f' . 1 ri 1 . •» 1
r *• . t i } . H
3.ht .ht
r. 1 . ht . 7H
ff't.i' ?7JM.S
'.Hi' ?. 7II
.h3 ( 1 .HI ) . J 1 ( . 1H)
I!I.S« ( 17. MS) .1.3 ( .i'nl
"•rfll.! ( h7S.M) '•.-('». 3 ( b^H.S)
-SP ( .R'l) ,t3 t .(.<>)
1 "» . ' ? f 1P.SI-) IC.St- ( 15.1, Hi
C'.HP( 3.b?) h.?h( 3.1' 9)
.<»• ( .91)
•* . 1 W (, '•! . M 1 )
M.h1- lbhS.S7)
. "f t, . 1 1 )
1 1 , '1 <• ' I3.l«)
rt-si s'Eii.;^i
ACTUAL HijAU L
CASOLINF l-i-J
I'llllMtlEfi h
GHAl'JS/LH) NO
3
HUT TIMMT.Ir N r
I (• ? S . h ( b t . 0 )
1 1 1 7. H ( '. ;.it;
i '. i ( M n.ii)
UI3M
*- 1 . f ( ? 1 h e . J )
•I ' . s / i / •» J
1 3.1/ ?/ 1 -I
tl.h/lV »1
?. 1 /I V r>
H. I/ ?/ 1 .''h
1 . 3/ ?/ .US
?l .<)/ f/
-------
i f'i>.
-F s.n Lf*
: VIPSTlVI A
T\ f Mf v.-iAL IMI
n»Y
o
I
Tfr. pi. i r>Fr. f(7n.o
'T inn
HLO//I: * IMLFI TFVP. nri:, C.tnrc. F .)
RL""^ OFVH.HT TO'JS
CVS F|_n* STO'. rij.
r.
«C TF U/KANpt /t-PW
t '^n F K/D(ivr,[ /ff T
vp IF U/PAM-.F /PPM
HC
CO
CO
r.o?
CO?
NiU
Nf .K
KC COMCF.»iTWAT ION FPM
CO CD'ICF "T"A r T OM PP"
CH? CUNfF "'TPA ! IOM PfT
fJ'IX L^^ONr F *' T W A T I 0^ PPU
rn
r..\?
f!F. /PP"
F'JFL
( ril)aMS/"I | F )
(r.HAi'S/" J I F. )
OTST4MCF
^|f'^ Mil. %
CV "I. '
PCL* i jvf HlU'IO
AHVJI.HTF MU'-'IO
1
CPll> TRAMSTfcNT
i^^i.n (HI.")
1*73.? f SP , I'M
* 3 . 5 ( 1 1 1' , II )
ini*q
M .r> c?m*.R)
IJ.P/ »/ MM
I .* / 3/ t*
3*. 3/ 3/ HDR
.?/ V b
HH.S/ ?/ ?.?!)
1 .?/ ?/ .1*
?q.s/ ?/ 3"
?,1/ ft 3
<;.BS
qa
7HH
?. 1 s
?7.1
3.*h
13JHS
?*!<;. s
?.q 1
,M> ( .Sh)
q,3? ( !<; ,01 )
*|R.? f h7?.q)
.in t .Pi)
1C. IS ( l^.SR)
1.7B f J.^q)
»I'M
,
ITV 7,h r,M/K(.:( S3.? 1
J
STAMTLI7F.P
IhSl.'l (hb.ll)
1*73.? (S* ,H)
«3.3 (1 III, IH
17771
ID* ' c jsqq.s)
?*,'!/ ?/ ?*
ii1,1;/ ?/ H
1 1 .n/u/ n
.q/i 3/ i
77. R/ 3/ 1 .*?
3 , n / 3 / , n s
IS.*/ £/ IS
?.3/ f/ ?
q. 33
13
q
J.3R
13.3
.'«
l.l1*
? s S 3 . ?
?.*<
,],» ( , T c hRI. (?)
,3q ( ,h3)
iR.fi ( i?,q?)
»-.S3 ( 3.H7)
TLST «F ir.nr
CASOLT'Jf FM-1
(I'lll^F tf »•' h
SHAJMS/tH) hO
?
Mill TIJANSTtNT
it-sj.n (t-s.ii)
1 * 7 1 . S ( S H . 1) )
* 3. j (i in. n)
1 '1337
s u . q ( f i s i . 7 )
*7.*/£/ *?
13. fl ?/ 13
3S.7/13/ JS
,*/ 1 3/ 1)
* 3,s/ ?/ i ,q?.">/ ft a
?,*/?/ i
b.qj
3b
1 1
i ,Rq
?n.h
i .^'
?, ^ i
?1 1^. 3
?.1B
,a^ c ,3S)
.*!) ( >*)
3h 3, 5 ( 5R* . H )
,3R ( .hit)
11.17 ( IS. 11)
S.RI ( 3.S1 )
.in)
uoan
«r,{ 41,1111 LMS)
H.II nn( in, 7 v,f)
. S 5 f 13.*.-.}
-------
i4PltC-27.vF.Hir.L5 r"issin;i
'!", H
'-'OnFl 7<* Cwt-V V«UP. JMIFI p MK, «?P(lfl. H?
tnoi-fw jh|Fr IFMP, off.. C(rrr,t
MLf>isV>< uF vfH liT THUS
n/s n.o« STO'. rii. "F
wr:
Co
rn?
Ml*
finx
"t tt r
•«r TF i
"t [FD/n4«|f;t /PP'J
W(rTF^/PANnF/PCT
"F TFP/P4(int /PCT
Vf ir i5/utMr,t /PPW
f'p- TFO/B ANT.t /CPM
DM.Iir IfH| F AT, T l»
"C tOMTM T"a t 1 IJM
en C"nrf MTW« TTON
C»? Ciif1 rl >m/i r triN
wtiy r.'iNf.f NJO»T iffi
HC N"S.SS r.«4"S
Cu M«Ss r.oAvi;
inx
c,nn-«i/*'->
C'l
C»LCl'L»IF;n
rnwf'n.siTf FTP pi-
Hf. GHA"H/*M
Cn r.HA'.-s/K-'
COP GW/l'/tj/l/M
«v rM i. / inii
fc)
s/ui i F
N «y tp L
TFST MO, ? PIJM
OATt S/15/7q
TIMfc
r>YN'0 NO, 5
CVS NO. 7
RAfi CART NO, |
HtlATIVF. HIIWIOITV
APSOLUTE HU"iniTV
1
COI D TPAN3IENT
J 7ni .fl (h7. 0)
l%?t.P (Ml. II)
t3.3 (lin.O)
1135"
Ml. 8 (?I3R.3)
in.n/ 3/ inn
1 ,*/ V l%
PR ,q/ 3/ b 7t
. I/ 3/ ?
t 7,B/ ?/ ?.lb
| ,!»/ ?/ ,PS
?R,?/ ?/ ?"
1 .B/ ?/ ?
h.nn
B7
hit
n).
xG( •K.liii LHS)
«." "<•••( iu.? MP>
MOX HUMIOI1V C.F.
-------
VF."iri_f 'i". 1 a
•MiOF I 7Q CuF V f'Al IH';
s." i. Mni; rpM »i- P
'I «r.( -n (.HS)
'-f f^ 7x1.«7 >•'< >ir:r?3.ii !» MO
.PnjFCTi Nil, i i-
»f)«D
H«rt «r sill, l n
(ifl U '-J< I' 'H F '.' 1?
'H scu i"r t.if! rinir. Twa^sifM ST»MILI/FO
H(_M'. F -V h t c P .'M, ion 1 IN. >'?0) |Mlll,p(><1.n) |hnil.?((,1,(U
>>IO'>.rf i"|Ft • '•'". HP'ifl'. i-Pp) 1*47, R (S7.1) |f»7,R (b7,ll)
i'.Ln->- IMIFT tFM/ OFT.. C(OF(i. F) »* . » til".") "3.) Clin.n)
'iLi'^h^ =f viL"' I'i'"i ln^^q ) 57911
( we CLI'" CTO'. {•'.'. "FfWFSfsrF) '•l.t f?171,?J K'S,* (37??. M)
t'i'. SM'T-i F *T 'F W/DAMIJI /PPM |n.h/ ?/ |n>- ?H.S/ ?/ ?h
in; ^MT.u-n -T IF4 /w^',r,t /PPV I.)/ I/ 13 15, M/ ?/ is
f.il sa^uij Mr Tpu /pA'ir.f /I'C" P^,'/ ?/ ^7? >-,t/lJ/ (.
f'.l «(«r;i>n "F IF u/o«fT,F; /l-'Pv ,)/ V ? 1 . h / M / ?
n ' 1,1 SA^ci r -. Cnl'.TI "T"! r I (IN PP" t?q.? H.7
Mf '.'4?!; i;uai'S 3. '7 .8"
rn'-'t<;;ilRl'i
»l|,, VfS<; r.i,ft..-, ,. A ' • <: / ••• 1 1 F ) t t; P ( , '^ ' ) . 1 ? ( . f n )
r;i- |,UA«-.s/y ••' (r.UA'.'S/'Ml f ) F-.l-t ( 1 " . F. « ) ,«>. ( .IS)
r'i?(,i.-A>'i!/K|i' fr'M'is/^HF) tiq.? f F,7»,*«) 4 3 j> f t; f F>T;.M)
'"!»(.'< A' ((;u AVS/'*U F ) . KP ( ,Ht) , JM ( .hi3)
FIIFL C'iMsu"i'f i n>i IIY rn i. / 1 iinni'f»pr.) IR.1"^ ( li3.??) I«,»M ( l?.7')
(AirijiArfn nisr'"|ri »" ("lirsi ^.H^ ( J.hl) ti.t'h ( J.m)
r.rviF1')'-, [ Tf (70 Djr ",lll t ^
rlf (.-,f.'"^v" (IIF'A-S/^II M .('^ ( , »R)
rn r.«A •-,/«•• (r.wA-is/"f I.F ) i.'.n f ^.41)
( op (,ur,,..^/k.. (rfcAMS/' ILb ) t|i.c'? (h*>?.7R)
ifll (.!.•«•.••!/," (C.i--Ai'.S/''Il F ) .4^ ( .h7)
lI,) 17, ;i f M.^U)
J
H!U TMAMSrf.'iT
1 MIM .<" ( li 1. IO
i^t^s (S7.ni
•• * . 3 ( l l ii . n )
1 n i s i
M.'i (?ihH.m
»,•.«,/ ^/ »*
1 I.?/ ?/ 13
?S.S/13/ ^t
I. IMS/. 1
t }.(>/ ?/ 1 ,.|'
i.i"
J . t, q
i> 1 P7.H
't ( .1,1,11)
K1( ISO" LHS)
B.U KM in.7 MM)
Hti"iniTr C.F
-------
TA1LEC-29.VEHICLE EMISSION RtSJLTP
VEHICLE Ni). 13
VEHICLE MIJDFL 7q CHEV MALIBU
5.11 L(3n<; CIO) V-B
Gvrf
II K0(
-n LOS)
H5.»q MM HG(?<1.3<; IN MR)
DRY SUL"* TEMP. ?l.i DEC, C(70.n OFG F)
TEST NO. I RUN
DATE 5/lb/7q
TIME
DYNO NO. <;
CVS NO. 7
BAG CAR I NO. I
PROJECT NU. ll-t»qj-uni
TEST WEIGHl ISqi KC( 35PT L?S)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD s.o K^( in.7 HP)
GASOLINE M-3«b-F
OI10METEH b313
RELATIVE HUMIDITY Ml Pf.T
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY q.S GM/KGC bb.b GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .qms
BAG
RAT,
OESC'IPTTON
BLi1""':? OIF P MM. H?OCIN.
' PILFT P IM. H?OCIN. H?O>
! IMLFT TFMP. DFG. C(OEG. F)
I REVOLUTIONS
TVS CLOH STO. CD. M^I
HC SAMPLE Mf TF9/HANGF/PPM
HC
cn
CO?
i
o v-ur j- .Pt.E ME TE"?/R»NGE/°CT
i co? =!.?
10. S/
1 .5/
?b ,H /
.!/
HB.H/
l.O/
3f. 7/
1.7/
i;
5
!.
pq
3
tn
y i P
r ' c
?
.57
7.TB
H i q. q
.57
18. »?
5.77
. ? H ( .31)
.bH ( ?.57)
(?me.B)
3/ 1H5
3/ 15
3/ bl 3
I/ ?
?/ 2. IS
?/ .fit
5/ 31
?/ ?
.•13
qi
7»
Ib
.3
.?7
.qn
.3D
( .tn
( 11. tn)
( b 75. 7)
( .''p)
( IP. 73)
( 3.5S)
105.1
?.7.5/
1 h . I/
H.1/1
(3713
?/
?/
3/
1 . 1/13/
7t.b/
3. 5/
15. 3/
l.R/
q
1.
13
? 7 ?
.13
.13
»37.b
. t 3
IB. 71
"""
3/ 1 .
3/ .
?/
S/
.15
13
7
» 1
.7
. Rtl
.B3
IKS
(
(
( 7P4
( .
( 1?.
( 3.
.?)
?«
Ih
8
1
Hh
us
is
?
?i)
??)
.?)
hq)
SB)
P7)
kl.l
47. S/
14. 3/
?n.q/
(Plbl
?/
Z/
13/
. 7/13/
H3.7/
).3/
P3.0/
i .q/
i
?
P i
.?!
.??
3bb. 4
.HP
15. b8
5.79
Zl I.
a/
ft
*'
b.qo
35
IS
.B^
1.4
1.J3
1.3IJ
a. 41
c
(
{ SB1'
(
( 15.
C 3.
.e)
47
1 4
in
i
M i
IIS
€3
*
J4)
5h)
.b)
b?)
no)
bO)
fMPR)
1 7.B3 ( 1 -?.?n)
-------
TABtE C-30.VFMICLF. EMISSION HtPULtS
FTPC
VEHICLE NO. 13
VEHICLE MODEL 71 CHEV.MALIBU
ENGINE S.n L(3I>5 CID) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW n Kf,( _c LBS)
DAROMfTER 7tt.73 MM HU(?q.3a IN HG)
DRY BULB TE"P. aa.? OEG C(??.n DEC F>
UAG RfSULIS
BAT, NIJMHFR
RLI1WFH OIF P MM_ HjlKIN. H?(l)
J"LET P MM. HaiinN
luLET lEwl'. -DEO. CfDEG. F)
BLOHKH REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLON STD. CU. METHES(SCF)
O
I
u>
HC
MC
CO
CO
co?
CD?
NOX
METER/RANGF/PPM
MFIFR/RANGF./PPM
SAMPLE
HCIGP.D
SAMPI E
MCHGRO Mt'lFR/RANGE/PPM
SIMPLE Mr. TFR/KANUF/PC T
HCKr.HD MF'ZR/HANHE/PCT
SAMPLE ME IF.H/RANGE/PPM
IF TFR/RANGF/PPM
DILUTION FACTOH
HC CONCENlRATlQN PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PCM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CnNCTNTRATION PPM
HC MASS GI'AMS
CO MASS (SWAMS
CO? MASS GWAM3
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
Co G(?AM$/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MRF)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CO L / lntlKM( MPG )
DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM' (GHAMS/MII.F)
CO GMAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILK)
CO? GHA»ir>/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GHAHS/KM ( GR AMS/H I |. F )
H)FL CONSUMPTION BY CU L/IIHIKM (MPG)
TEST Nil.
DATF 5/
TIME
DYNO NO.
CVS NO.
RUN
OAG CAWT NO. i
PELATIvF. H||MIt)ITy SJ PC T
ABSOIUTF HUMJPITY q. u GM/KG( H3.3
hl.B
5.11
IS
73H
a. u
at .a
s.'ta
S3. 1 b
a3i3.s
.si C
1. It (
ti1.t C hhf
.18 C
i«.as ( la.
s.sa c 3.
.711)
•1.37
1H
1.38
1?.1
.8R
aKR7.ii
.Jt ( ,«?3)
. n i ( . j'»)
au.3 ( bia.t)
.10 ( .b t >
'.3" f i?.;
'.at
l.HH)
PWIJJF.CT mi. 1 I -»tM.l-oiil
TFSV
ACTUAL RliA" I.O*L»
C'SHLIMF
HDllMtTEH
KU(
H.ll
HI IHR)
Ji'.-' HP)
3*
i.<
*AMS| t-.HT
( b i? . ') '
( 5 r- . u ;
( 1 III. 11)
I3S1
hi . 1 f?IHh.n)
1 1 . 1 /
l.H/
3 3 . r. /
.a/
1 7. 7/
1 . V
an. ?/
a.3/
3/ 111
3/ 1«
3/ 78B
3/ 5
?/ a. is
?/ .IIS
?/ a 7
?/ a
33. h/ a/
ai .b/ a/
7.7/1.3/
3. a/ i 3/
77. I/ 3/
3.3/ 3/
it . a/ a/
i.i/ a/
31
i?
•)
3
1.43
.115
11
I
t B . B/ a/
11. «/ a/
at. i/i3/
1 ."/I V
1 1 . i / a /
i . ?/ a/
ai .s/ a/
.i/ ?/
«q
r1!!
c" 7
?
1 .''b
.lit
dl
1
• 3a>
Mll.h)
3-bU)
17.73 ( 1 3.?7)
-------
APPENDIX D
MUSTANG FTP RESULTS FOR REGULATED AND UNREGULATED
EMISSIONS WITH SEVEN TEST FUELS
D-/
-------
TABLE D-l. SUMMARY OF REGULATED EMISSIONS FROM 1978 MUSTANG
Tent
No.
11-1
11-2
11-3
11-4
12-1
12-,'
13-1
13-7
14-1
14-2
14-3
D 14-4
1
1S-1
1 ~ .'
10-3
10-1
10-2
10- t
lu-.l
10-')
17-1
IV- 2
10-1
1H-2
t'U'l J
EM-373-F
FM-373-F
HM-373-F
CM-373-F
Avrrnqi'
KM -374- F
KM- 174- F
Av.n-.T)r.
EM-37:,-F
I'M-n-i-F
AV.T.I'Ji!
KM-371-r
KM-371-F
KM-V/l-F
RM-371-r
Av.-r,>,,o
KM-172-F
1.M-372-I'
KM-372-F
AV'T'TI"
KM-311'J-F
I'.M- 3H')-F
I'-.M-Jlvi-r
I-:M-:IIV»-F
KM- 3HM-F
Aver .l'|i'
W-3BVF
I;M- JM'.-F
Av.ir.iq.!
KM- 3116- F
KM- 3W>-F
AV'T.I'/O
IV'll.t.'
11-1 1-7B
11-10-711
11-17-7(1
11-7.1-7(1
11-12-7(1
tl-1 3-711
11-14-7H
11-1 ',-711
11-27-7H
11-7.0- 7H
12-04- 7(1
17-0'j-7H
ll-?')-7l
0.44
y.r>7
0 . 46
6"."V2
O.r>2
0.4'i
0.4'J
0.44
0.44
0 . 3')
0.41
0.47
0.4')
0.40
0;jlP
(7.40
0.02
0.511
0.00
0.41
0. 4M
().. V.
0.44
0.4',
0.4'">
0 . 411
0.44
0 . 40
ssloir.J n.ilc'
CO
4.13
3. 60
3.51
3 . (If,
3.711
3. 34
2.')H
J.ld
3.01
1 . 20
i". i~4
3.44
2.67
2.7?
3.20
7?»ii
l.l'O
1.7V
1 .00
l~.~f«)
0.77
7.77
0.47
4. '31
'j.flh
rr.o'i
3.77
3.0ft
3.42
4.03
3.70
3.07
'• , 'j/ki
H<
1 .
1,
1,
1
j"
O.
O.
(T.
o.
o.
o.
o .
3 .
1.
0.
1.
0.
f).
0.
o".
0.
o.
1).
o.
f) _
o.
n .
o.
n
0.
O.
(1 .
11
'.X
.10
. 16
.22
•J"
r\i
.••I
.') 3
"FT
'17
"3
,r,
•w
07
07
'111
TlT
(13
13
i!0
'"'
ll-l
VII
7',
H 1
l'3
II')
'11
»7
MO
hi.
fill
li/
a
0
u
o
0
0
o
0
o
<\
u
0
0
0
o
o
(1
o
o
1)
M
II
o
ft
0
0
0
o
u
0
II
0
ik: I-:V.T|
111!!.
. 3;
. 30
.2',
. :'n
'."Si
.;.
T'T.
73,
n.
7.3,
3.
3.
.3.
3.
3.
17.
r>.
14.
1 4 .
!.
.1.
7 .
^.
3.
i"i
n.
M.
0".
3.
4.
Y.
' i:r,ii r,!
31.
.0(1
.74
.114
. 32
.7f,
.no
.07
,TT;'
.(14
.2?
,',3
, 8'J
,113
00
0')
,Yi
f.o
(.0
'>')
V,
D4
11
r,o
17
43
Yi
in
JO
o'7
:,2
44
'IH
•iioMK,
(|
To L.I I
10.
<1.
', .
K
0*.
29.
2S.
TT
24.
7. .«.
73.
4.
3.
1.
1.
1.
17.
10.
14 .
14~.
3.
1.
3.
3,
3.
3.
,,
f,
Hi
'JO
o"i
,„,
oo
0'.
'>(,
H'.i
f,4
3!
7.1
~<"4
7"
')!
7<)
C')Cl««
m^l i<
1/HiO kn
Hi
10
10
- - lo
"lo
10
r,
'ii.
10
lo
lo
10
10
r>
i'.
to"
10
10
10
10
14
14
1 1
14
14
11
14
14
Y.!
14
14
14
.^'i
. 32
. .32
. 44
.41
. IH
.
. IH
. T,
.11'' t
.01
.117
. r.
. OM
. ,,,
.117
.'31
.VI
. ?')
. -!.'
.7''
."7
.'iid
. 3H
.41
."in
-------
TABLE D-2. INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBON EMISSIONS FROM 1978 MUSTANG
a
i
No,
11-1
11-2
11- )
1 1 - 4
1J-1
J7-2
13-1
14-1
14-3
14-4
15-1
15-2
1 1.-.1
10-1
10-2
10- 3
10-.)
10-5
17-1
1 7-2
in-i
IB-:!
Flic -I
KM-373-F
EH-373-F
KH- 171-F
KM- 3 7 3-F
EM-3V4-F
KM-371-F
Avrrar: )
KM-17'J-F
KM-"i7r,-F
Avr r .Kft'
KM-371-F
KM- 371- F
KM-371-F
Wi-371-F
Av...r.Ti.o
KM- 3 72- F
KM-377-F
KM- 172-F
AW.T.I.J'.
KM-'lH'l-P
KM- 389-F
EM- KI9-T
KM-3H9-F
KM- 3IVI-F
Av,.r.,.l"
KM-3H'i-F
KM- lllS-F
Avc-t .nio
EM-3HO-F
KM-JDO-F
Av,.>|-,i')"
l)0lr_
11-11-70
11-10-78
11-17-78
1 1 - 2 1 - 7ft
11-12-78
11-13-78
11-14-7U
11-15-7H
11-27-78
11-20-711
17.-O4-VIJ
12-05-78
11-79-7(1
11- JD-78
12-01-78
1-nll-7'l
5-09-79
5-10-79
5-22-79
5-21-7')
5-14-79
5-15-79
5-10-79
"i-n-T>
McMli.im-
11.
40.
40.
49.
50.
'.,4.
50.
49.
i,0.
50.
50.
2 5
49_,
43.
53.
49,
35,
.
.00
.44
•Ji2
.37
.75
.14
7'! - 7...11
77
10
HI
91
47
0.7
00
oo
01
10
03
HG
95
11
Hi
MO
10
13
14
2H
13
11
T?
13
0
9
.07
.47
.35
. I'l
.07
,.42
. '10
.411
. 'H
."71
.55
.09
.!)?
Den
If-
14
17
li,
19
.1.4.
10
17
15
10
12
7
JU
'''
7
0
(.
r,
25
211
21
15
JLO
?l
12
n
'i"i
17
I'.CMH1
.01
.79
.21
Ti
.0)
.•-4.5
. 75
.27
.54
.41
.30
.39
..)y
.29
.119
.09
...10
."1
.79
.40
.13
.41
. M1
.40
.no
. in
,Vi
. 18
n.on
JO
.1 i
•IMliii-in
12.43
14.17
14.7'.
n.8o
:"I./IH
19. 3J>
'•'*•'>*
JH. 71)
1 11 .70
I". 70
2V. 3)
73.55
20..J1-)
25.91
.-..54
20. | 3
;' i. . :- 5
:>.'. 11
')4 . 70
10 1.0'..
97.25
(il.oi.
71...VO
7 2 . 0 1
f, 5 .Ml
•id. 07
'.'•". H
70.05
15..8.5
r'3.2'i
-------
TABLE D-3. ALDEHYDE EMISSIONS FROM 1978 MUSTANG
O
I
FTP Aldehydes Emissions Ratrfl , mg/km
TV si
No.
11-1
11-2
11-J
11-4
12-1
12-2
1 1-1
13-;'
14-1
14-2
•1 1
14-4
11-1
r>-2
J 1 - 3
ll.-l
16-2
16-3
16-4
1.,- i
17-1
I ;-2
1 H- 1
IH-2
furl
KM-373-F
KM-373-r
FM- 373-F
KK-3M-F
Avf.T iq'1
KH-374-F
KM-374-F
Av.T.i'l"
KM-371-F
KM-37r,-F
Aver r aq<>
EM-371-F
BM-371-F
KM- l/l-F
KM- 171-F
Ay-ruqc.
KM- 172- F
f'M-372-F
CM- 172-F
AV.M ,|.|..
KM- 111 >-f
KM-.!H ,-r
gM-IMM-F
KM- lli'i-F
KM- 311')- F
AV'T.IH"
KM JMV-r
KM-3Hb-r
AVOl'.KJC1
r.K- .«' I
L'M-V -K
AVlT.l'Jf
n.itc
lt-U-78
11-1G-7R
11-17-70
H-21-78
11-12-7H
11-13-7H
U-M-70
11-11-78
11-27-711
1 I-2H-7H
l.?-'M-7il
12 -01 -711
11-29-7U
11-30-7(1
12-(H-VI1
-,-tjn-T!
l-on-7'i
1-10-7')
1-22-7'!
1-,".l-7'l
1-M-7-)
'j-11-7'1
S-lO-'M
1- 1 7-7't
Form-
1 . l'6
O.'i3
1. 30
1 . .'f.
1. 37
1 . 30
1. 14
l.'l')
•>. . .10
2.11
1.4"
1.37
1.41
1.10
1.43
1 . 4'>
1.4;
2 . 16
1 . 17
1.37
0.44
0
1. J"
'1 1 1
1 .'!')
-! . 2 7
O.HI
0.06
O.44
Acot-
0
O.M
0
0.17
1.68
0.44
1.06
1.74
2.30
2.02
0
0
0
1 .12
1.5S
O.O6
O.'JJ
0.21
0
0. 31
0.1')
(I
0.2'.
0. 37
0.31
0. 34
O.06
0
0.03
Rct'tom'*
0
0.12
0
0.04
o.v>
0. 31
0,41
0.31
0.37
0. 14
0.12
O.OG
0.06
0.06
0.19
0 . 06
O. Ill
0.12
0 . 06
0.06
0
O
O.OB
0.12
o. n
0.16
o
0
0
Inobut.y r-
0
0
0
0
0
o
o
o
0.12
0 . 06
0
o
0
o
o
11
11
0
o
0
0.10
0
II. 1(1
0..17
o
0.1')
o
0
0
M.-Lhylnthyl
Kelonc
O
0
O
O
0.19
0
0. 10
O.OG
0. 12
O.C6
O. 19
0.12
0.16
O
0.12
O .06
0 . 06
0.31
O
O
0
(I
ll.Ofi
o
0
n
o
0
o
Croton-
0
O
0
0
0
o
ii
o
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
U
"
0
0
0
I)
o
o
0
0 . 06
0.01
II . I '.'.
I). 12
0. 12
Moxfln-
0 . 1 '1
O.OG
0.12
0.12
0 . 1 ')
0
0. 10
o . or,
0. 1')
0.13
0.1 'I
0.19
0. 1'J
0.12
o. m
o. r>
0. 17
0
0
0
o
0
o
0
0
o
0
0
0
0. 41
0.12
0.31
0.2B
O.HI
I . '.!')
1.211
0.81
1.71
1 .2"
0.62
0
0. 31
0
(1.11
!).'»!
0.47
1 .'.'A
1 .')!
n
1 .I'i
0. 12
2.67
) .40
0.12
0 . 2 b
0.1')
Total
2.42
1.73
1.73
1 . '16
4 . 74
4.04
4 . 1'.'
J .';7
/. 11
6.06
2 . (< 1
1 .74
2. IH
'.'. . MO
.!.'!(.
_• . 'I')
3.H<
1.04
1.41
,' . 1H<
1.04
i)
•'•'"'
3.b4
1.22
4. 31
1. 74
0.44
J . ()')
.in it|f i M .-im! pro|i.vm
-------
VEHICLE NO. is
VEHICLE MODEL 78 FORD MUSTANG
ENGINE ».i LOO? cio) v-s
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW o KGC -o LBS)
BAROMETER 7tb.?s MM Hctai.ss IN HG)
DRY BULS TE^P. ?>».* DEC C(7b.O DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIP P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?O(IN. H?O)
TABLE D-4. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. a RUN
DATE ll.'ll/7B
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. CCDEG.
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW 3TD. CU. METRES(SCF)
F)
D
en
H- SAMPLE HETER/RANGE/PPM
t . BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE MF.TER/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD NETER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAM3
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
Co? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MIL^)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUf.L CONSUMPTION BY CB L/10lKM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (HUES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MlLE/
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IOOKM (MPG)
PROJECT NO. i
TEST HEIGHT 1591 KGC 3500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 1.3 KW( 1?.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-373-F
ODOMETER Sbb3
RELATIVE HUMIDITY S3 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.1 GH/KGC 7o.b GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .1718
COLD TRANSIENT
1587.5 (ba.S)
inaa.H (Sb.o)
H?.? (108.0)
103h3
ba.O (2111.3)
an.-)/ 3/ aos
1.3/ 3/ 13
H0.5/ 3/ 1b7
,i/ 3/ a
HH.b/ a/ i.is
I.H/ a/ .05
b3.b/ ?/ b»
i. i/ a/ i
b.HO
tia
11?
I.IH
b5.7
b.87
bs.ia
a?os. i
•>.ai
1.11 i 1.1?)
11. HH ( 18. *0)
30?. b ( blS.b)
i.?b ( a. 03)
17. 2b ( 13. b3)
5.7b ( 3.58)
STABILIZED
1587. 5 (ba.S}
itaa.H (Sb.o)
Ha. a (108.0)
1771*
lOb.S (37b?.t)
?3.b/ ?/ at
n. ?/ a/ la
HB.a/13/ Hb
1.1/13/ 1
71. H/ 3/ 1.81
3. I/ 3/ .05
3H.H/ a/ 3H
i. a/ a/ i
10.31
13
if 3
i.as
33.5
.80
5.33
?t38.3
b.bl
.13 ( .?!)
.8b ( 1.31)
315. t ( b3b.3)
1.08 ( 1.75)
lb.15 ( 13.68)
b.17 ( 3.83}
HOT TRANSIENT
1587.5 (ba.S)
1317.0 (55. 0)
na. a (loa.o)
103b»
b?.? (2118.2)
83. a/ a/ 93
10. 7/ a/ 11
at.s/ii/ HOO
.3/11/ 1
1b.3/ 3/ I. 81
3.8/ 3/ .Ob
so. i/ a/ 50
.i/ a/ i
7.2?
7t
371
1.7b
HI. 3
e.bb
a7.»»
aoob.H
5.75
.Hb ( ,7H)
•».77 ( 7,b7)
318.5 ( SbO.7)
1.00 ( l.bl)
is.ab ( is. na)
5.7b ( 3.58)
,Hi» ( .71)
H.lt ( b.bS)
371,BS (bll.lB)
.1.1(1 C 1.77)
lb.55 C IH.ai)
-------
D-5. VF.HICLF. FMTSSION RESULTS
PHOJECT NI-. 1 1 -'*
VEMKIE MM. is
Vf.Hln I Mill'! I. 7H Fl|f<0 "1151 AM,
ENGirif: t. s I ( «n? CIU) v-n
TRANSMISSION *3
Gvw |i K'J( -it I «S)
BAROMFTFJR
ifMp.
MG)
i. \ r.f r, c(7".»
TEST NO. 1 RUN
DATE. ll/lh/»R
TIME
OYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
PAG CAWT Nil. 1
RELATIVE HUMIQlTY «I PCT
ARSOIUTF. MCMJOJTY h.5
1E3T
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
T.ASOLINE EM-S7J-
ODOMETER
KS( JSl'ii LI'S)
"».,' •<-,( if . j KM)
HS.2 GRAINR/IH)
NIIX HUMIDITY C.F.
BAG RFSUI. I S
HAG NIIMHt'H
a
HLOWFK OIF P MM. K?n(lN. H?ll)
BU'i»F.U 1'M.ET P MM. H?I)(IM. M?(I)
RLnwFR INLFT IfMP. 1'fH. C(DKG. F)
RUlxFP Kl VOLUTIONS
c^c. PI UH r,rn. en. MFI'US(^CF)
HC SAMHlf Mf.
HC HCi-GPD METEP/R«NGF/PFM
CO SAMPLF. ME If.H/yOlil.'t /PPM
CO RCKf,f7[) MF IFH/R"M",F/PP"
co? SAMPLE
NDX SSM^lt MElER/fiANGf/PPM
NDx
fill. UI IIIN F4C1UR
CO CONCFNTRAT Ii)N PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOy CONfrsTRATION P°M
HC MASS
C') MA.SS
co? MASS GRAMS
^J n y M A o ."> r, iv A M S
HC BPAMS/KH (RRAMS/HK F)
Cll r.lMM.I/KM CGr'AMS/Mll f )
Ml* GRAMfi/K'1 ( GWAMS/M ILK )
FUFL CONSUMPTION <\i rn L/IIH>KM(MPC)
DISTANCE KM (»ILtS)
COMPOSITF FTP RESULTS
HC RRAMf./lvM
CO GRAMT./KM
CO? GRAMS/KM (C.RAMS/MII.E)
NOX GRAMS/KM CGHAMS/MILF)
FUFL COM.r-IJMPTION RY CH L/lf|fKM (MPG)
COLO TRANSIENT
1M17.8 (hi. 3)
1 •* •» 7 . B ( 5 7 . 11 )
HH.H f 112.11)
IP ,b7
bll.q (21511.7)
J1.5/ 3/ 215
I.I/ 3/ 1H
*?.?/ 3/ 101?
.!/ 3/ ?
fH.i/ ?/ ?.'in
l.b/ B/ .lib
78. J/ ?/ 7H
I ,3/ f/ Z
h.33
?II3
15B
1.15
7(..?
7.1*
b7. £(3
P17S.b
7.7B
l.?3 ( l.n)
11.75 ( 1«. 11 )
37h.3 ( hiiS.5)
1.35 ( 8. 17)
17.0? ( M.B?)
5.78 ( 3.SS)
3. Ml ( 5.79)
1 . |b ( l.Bb)
Ih. 3?. ( 1H.H?)
STABILlZEn
Ibn7.8 ((,3.3)
ItH?.? (57, 1))
t1*.1* (IJS.H)
17BIIR
IMH.b (3b1'».3)
SS.H/ a/ ?s
1».2/ ?/ I*
?H .1/13/ ?*
P.0/13/ ?
7).7/ 3/ 1.3f
3.7/ 3/ ,nb
to. i/ e/ fo
?.!/?/ 2
111.28
13
^l
1.25
3ft.?
.7h
?.SS
2381. B
(-.70
.12 ( .20)
.HI ( .b7)
3HH.J ( b2H.7)
I.(H ( 1.75)
Ib.bl ( IH.lb)
b.lb ( 3. S3)
MOT TRANSIENT
lh,i?.H (b3.3)
I*1* 7. 8 Ci7.ll)
"H.H (J12.M)
iu3hn
bO.B (21HR.H.1
M.I/ J/ It
ift.H/ if in
bl.1/11/ 213
.b/11/ 2
H?.?/ ?/ 1.R5
1.3/ ?/ .05
bb. I/ ?/ hb
1.6/ 2/ 2
7.01
h3
277
1.81
bH.B
2.21
llibH
? (122.0
b.b2
. 38 ( ,b2)
3,tn ( S.H8J
3t,ll.H ( -Jb3.8)
1.15 ( 1 .BH)
15. ?t ( 15. ts;
1.77 ( 3.51)
-------
T*RLFD-6. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
MPC
PH|1J!:CT NU. 1 l-l
VEHICLE NO. IS
VEHICLE MODEL 7n FORO MUSTANG
ENGINF *.1 L(3<12 CIO) V-R
TRANSMISSION *3
GVH () KG f .n LHS)
BAROMFTER 7H(,.51 MM Hi;(2^.H IN HG)
DRY BULB TfMP. 21).? n':'G Cth'^.n OFG F;
BAG HFSULTS
BAT. NUMnCR
DTSCRIPTION
BI.OWt.R OIF f> MM. H20UN. H20)
6LOWFR INLET P MM. H?0(IN. H20)
fll.OWEfl INLET TEMP. DEG. C(PEG. F)
nLO-ER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW 3TD. CU. METBES(SCF)
D
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO?
CO?
NOX
NOX
SAMpLF.
ME TFR/RANi'.F/l'PM
SAMPLT MF. IF.P/UANKF/pPM
SAMPt.F
BCKGRO
SAMPLF
METF'J/RAfJGF/PCT
METFR/RANGF/PCT
HF.TER/RANGF/PPM
METFR/RAMGE/PPM
on ui ID i FACTOR
HC CONCF.NTRAl ION I'PM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
C'V CONCTNTHATION PC f
Ni)< COMCFNTRAl ION PPM
HC MASS GPAMS
CO "ASS GRAMS
co? MASS G.RAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC URAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MlLF)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/HILF)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILF)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CR 1. / I OdKM( MPC )
DISTANCE KM
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GHAM3/KM (GRAM3/MIIF)
CO' GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILF)
CO? r,RA;T)/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY f.tt l./HinKM (MPr.)
3.51 (
375. t7
1 .?? (
lh,3? (
TEST NO. t RUM TEST HEIGHT 1511 KG( 3sno
DATE 11/17/78 ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 1.2 Kw( 1
TIME GASOLINE EM-373-F
DYNO NO. 5 ODOMETER S71b
CVS NO. 7
HAG Ct«T NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 31 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 5.7 GM/KG( 31.1 GRAlNS/Lb) NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
1 2 3
TOLD TRANSIENT STABILIZED HOT THANSIENT
lbni).2 (b3.ll) lbno.2 (b3.(l) lbnit.2 (V3.0)
11H7.8 (57. n) 1147.R (57.0) 11»7.8 (57.0)
•»•».«» (112.0) f».f (112.0) »f.H (112.0)
I03b3
bl
.»
(21h
1.»)
22. b/ 3/ 22b
H
»
1 .
.
1.
NO.
2.
b/
b/
2/
t/
b/
5/
7'
b
2
in
1.
7A
7
7R
3/
3/ 1
3/
2/ 2
2/
2/
2/
.2*
13
m
17
.2
.53
.2t
IS
157
5
.02
.Oh
Hfl
3
105
2H.
12.
25.
.
71.
2.
ts.
2.
177R5
.»
5/
5/
B/l
1/1
H/
7/
*/
t/
111
1.
H3
?
(3722.1)
2/ 21
2/ 13
3/ 2H
3/ 1
3/ 1.21
3/ ,f)H
? ' H5
2/' 2
.33
i 3
23
2b
•'
.no
.71
hi
bl.
11.
b5.
.
15.
2.
b7.
1.
1 0 3 b 2
.•»
2/
5/
(21b1
e/
2/
.0)
hi
11
2/12/ IHb
5/1
H/
5/
t /
S/
7
1
1.
bh
1
1
2/
3/ 1.
3 ' •
2/
2/
.*n
51
3M
7h
•'
.H2
.13
1
71
0*
b7
2
2212.1 2H
-------
a>
vrHICIE NO. it
VEHICLE MOOFL 7S FQPri
ENGTNF •».<< I no? CIO) v-S
TRANSMISSION «3
GV.* n Kcr -o I.RS>
FIHI.P.
? IN «,".)
c(7t.n 'jtr. F)
fl»C
OIF P MM
INLFT P MM.
TFUP , (5FG.
. ft
TVS FLOW $TO. CU'.
HC S*MPl t
HC OCKGPO
CO S»MpLr
co RC|(G°O M
CO? S*MPLI
Co? fCfr.ftn "
NQX SAM»ig M
NO* ncKGso M
/PPM
/PPM
DILUTION r»CTOP
HC CQNCf MTBtTTON
CO
CO-7
r.u»w3
CO M&S3 (j04M3
co? MASS c°«uS
NO* W«SS ROAMS
CO
CO?
HO* 6"*MS/ifM i r,H«M.t/MIl F )
FUFL CONSUMPTION BV CR L/ifOKMfMPr.5
nrSTAMcF KM
Ftp
HC CHAMS/kM (nPAM5)/MJ| F )
CO CP.i«-S/KM
CO? CHAMS/KM
NO* GS/1MJ/KW
FUFL CON^ii"PTioNi nv
D~7.VEHICLE EMISSION PENULTS
FTPC
PPOJECT NO.
TEST NO, » RUN
DATE U/?l/7fl
TI«E
OYNO NO. 5
CVS NO'. 7
BAG CART NO, 1
RELATIVE HI/MIDITI
»PSOLl)TE HU^lDlTi
1
COLO. TRANSIENT
Ibno'.? (M.O)
1 •• •« 7 , R (57, n)
»3.i () 11 ,n)
10370
bl.H (?lh7r7)
?7,1/ 3/ 279
?*0/ 3/ ?0
'> * , 5 / 3 / 1209
,3X 3/ 7
»».3/ «/ 1.17
I.7/ ?/ .Ob
7t,B/ 11 7S
l.<»/ tl f.
b.lS
?b?
1J39
1 ,n?
73.?
«.?8
Bl!|»3
Jisy.t
P. 03
!.(.? ( ?,fcO'.
1* • 1' ( ??.'3)
375.? ( b"3.7)
l.*0 ( ?.?5)
17.18 ( l".b<<)
5.7M ( J.57)
.»« ( ',77)
3. 8>, ( (,,?!)
1.1» ( I,1"!)
h.1** f H.3t)
t »» PCT
' B<(< GM/KG' "•'
?
STABILIZED
Ib00.2 (b3.0)
\»»7,B (57.0)
t3.1 (111.0)
17781
ins.J (i7U.j)
?7.0/ ?/ ?7
Ib.S/ ?/ Ib
»0.»/13/ 38
3.+/13/ 3
7?,S/ 3/ 1.3?
^.a/ 3/ .05
38, 6/ Z/ 3>?
1,7/ S/ *
in.m
i?
J*
1 ,?7
37.1
.7*
* . 1*
?*'*I<.Z
7.01
,li ( ,1*1
.k7 ( l.OB)
3*
-------
TAfltC D-8.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
VEHICLE NO. 15
VEHICLE MODEL 7s FORD MUSTANG
ENGINE 1.4 L(302 CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
CVM a KC( -n UBS)
BARP^tER 7<)S.71 MH HC(21.3b IN MC)
DRY BULB TEMP. ?3.4 OEG COS.O DEC F)
TEST NO. 1
DATE 11/12/71
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
CVS NO, 7
BAG CART NO.
RUN
PROJECT NO. 11-1143-001
TEST HEIGHT 1541 K6( 3500 LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 4.* •<»•( 12.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-371-F
OOOHETER Sb4l
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ss PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.1 GM/KCC 72.* 6RAINS/L8)
NOX MUMIOITY C.F. .4877
BAG RESULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
flLIKF.R nif P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET p MM. H?0(IN. M?0)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DFG. CCDEG. F
HLONF.R REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW 3TO. CU. METHE3(3CF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO?
O
SAMPLE
ME TFR/RANGE/PPM
METFR/RANGE/PPM
BCKGRn HETER/RANGE/PPM
SAMPLE ME tF.R/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE KETER/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MA33 GRAH3
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? M»3S GHAM3
NOX
NC GRAM3/KM (GRAM3/HILF)
CO GR»M3/ta
7S
S.Oi
( 1
( 5
.01)
.18)
( SbR.O)
( 1
( IS
( 3
.10)
,2'U
.52)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
co GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/HUE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MlLE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY Cfl L/100KM (UPS)
.57 ( .42)
3.33 ( S.17)
37b.h$ (bQb.03)
.43 { 1.50)
lb.38 ( 11.Jb)
-------
rmc
BISUUTS
VEHICLE NO. l«
VEHICLE MOnfL 71 'OBD MUSTANG
EN&INE ».* LOO? CIO) v-i
TRANSMISSION Al
CVX 0 KC( -0
BABQMETER »»l.l»
D»Y BULB TE*P. yj.
MGJM.ll IN HG)
pec Ct7 1,0 DEC
BAG RESULTS
BAG NU«8f.B
DESCRIPTION
BLO«IR DIF P MM. M?O(IN,
BLOwEB INLET P MM. M?OfIN. M?0)
ELD**!* INLET TFMP. ore. CCDEO. M
fiLQwl" BEVOLiiTJONS
CVfl rtOo STO. CO. >TT«(tS(8Cn
HC BCXCOO *
CO SAMPLE "
CO
co?
CO? BCK5BO uf TtB/B*NCE/PCT
DILUTION
HC CONCf.NT»»MOH PP"
CO CONCENTB4TION PP«
cc^ CONCFNTB«TION PCT
NOK CONCENTBlTION PP*
HC
co
CO?
HO*
CO CB»"J/xM
CO?
NOX
FUEL CONSUMPTION «r cs L/IOOKM(MPCI
C*LCUL*TfO OT3T»NCE
COMPOSITE rt» RfSUCTS
MC GOI
PBOJECT NO,
KG( 1SOO L6S)
ODOMETER
HUMIDITY *» »CT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY «,S GM/KO( kfc,» CR*IN3/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
COLD TRANSIENT
mill (*s*7)
»?,? (ioi, n)
initn
k
tl
II
9 j
1
kl
1
1.7
.7/
!"
.1'
!*'
• »'
,U
i
<*17
}/
I/
If 1
I/
It
I/
b.kl
fc«k
•«.*)
117
kkl
2
^}
.01
1
fcO.I
i
7, JO
STABILIZED
10*. i
H.O/
11. 7'
(»7H
?/
f/
ll.l/ll/
1.5/1
kl.S/
J.b/
17, 1/
.•/
10
1 ,
17
1
.0)
|4
15
(7
MOT TRANSIENT
1571,* (b?,0)
1111.1 (SS.7)
1?.? (101.0)
IQlbl
kl.k
78. I/
11. 1/
(?17b.<«)
*/
I/
7k, l/ll/
M \ .l/ll/
I/ 1.
I/ .
(/
I/
.kl
Ik
?5
10
,1
,^b
.Ob
?J
Ok
II
i
15. 1/
^ • 0 X
(| 9 • 0 /
.k/
1
I/ 1
J/
?/
?/
7.?l
kl
}??
.7S
71
11
HI
1
,iO
.Ok
11
1
11.5
?lli.i llli.t
1
• *k
170.1
(
(
1
*
l!
(HO.
.1*
|7I
71)
10)
70)
k.lk
( *
( ia
.01)
.»>
*
• Ik
.*o
( IM.k) J7S.k
c i
( 3
.^ J)
,tk)
.*«)
.Ik
Ik.Cf
k.ll
,«•
•
•
klO
1.
11.
I.
?t)
10)
.7)
11)
17)
If)
?
?,1]
1.1?
1171.0
.1?
1,00
Hl.k
,«5
11 .1C
1.77
I,"!
k
Si
1
11
1
,k»)
.oo)
l.k)
,17)
,71)
.51)
-------
VEHICLE NO. IS
VEHICLE MODFL ?B FORO MUSTANU
ENGINE ».s LOO? CIO) v-R
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW 0 KT,( -o LRS)
B«ROMFIER 7J1.90 MM MC(?«I.13 IN HG)
osr BULB TEMP, te.a OFC c(73.o 0£6 f)
TABLE D-IO.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
TTPC
TEST NO. i RUN
DATE II/H/7R
TIME
OYNO Nil. <;
CVS NO. 7
BAG CANT NO. I
RELATIVE HUMIDITY hS PCT
APSOLUTF. HUHJOITY 11.h GM/KG< H1.1
TEST wFir.MT 1st) Kii(
ACTUAL WHAO in»0 1.?
H»>\
ODOntTFK
o
I
«Af, NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
RLO»»E» INLET P MM. H?OUN. M?O)
RLOHER INLET TEMP. DEC. C
1 0 3H 1
bfl.B (?117.7)
?3.1/ 3/ ?31
!.«>/ 3/ 19
37. 3/ 3/ 8R5
.!/ 3/ ?
iS.l/ e/ ?.0l
1.3/ e/ .us
bO.i/ ?/ bn
l."»/ «/ *
h.33
? 1"
R3n
l."»7
SR.M
7.m
SB. 7?
?1^1 . 1
7.05
1.33 ( ?.)3)
10.20 { Ib.iO)
380.8 ( bie.7)
t.il ( l.<<7)
17.1? ( 13. 7»)
S.7b ( *.SR)
STApILlZtl1 MOT TRANSIENT
IS71.8 (b?.0)
1117. 1 Ci7.U)
11.1 ( 1 1 1 . (1 )
177Hh
1P1.1 OhBb.S)
JR. I/ ?/ 8R
1C.O/ ?/ 1?
2b.3/!3/ 2S
l.n/13/ 1
71. 1/ 3/ !.?•«
8.R/ 3/ .01
?8.8/ ?/ ?1
I.*/ Z/ *
10.37
1?
?3
l.?5
87.1
.71
?. 7'
Z3RJ.7
S.SR
.1? ( .1^)
.15 ( .73)
3R5.8 ( b?0.7)
.10 ( 1.15)
Ib.Sl ( I1.2S)
b.lR ( 3. at)
1571.8 (h?.
1117. H (5.7.
11.1 (1 !••
Ill \t<\
bH.7 (?1H
1?,7/ J/
1.7/ I/
87.7/18/
,3/Ji.V
H1.5/ ?/ I
I.I/ il
15. 3/ ?/
l.R/ ?/
7,?1
11?
mh
1.71)
13.7
J.'U
1 J.flt.
1-<8J.7
&.?••
.bR ( 1
?.n ( :»
3ii.«t ( •;«;
.*i\ ( i
11. OR ( IS
S.7S ( 3
0)
0 )
.")
'.•0
1?7
1 7
?Dl
1
.Re
.01
IS
?
.10)
.RR)
S .0)
.1')
.71)
.5')
3.01 ( *.B5)
373.«,! (bOO.IR)
,*7 ( l.Sb)
lh.?J ( 11.51)
-------
NO. is
VFMKLE MORFL 7» FORD «I'-,I»NG
ENGINF t,s LOO? CIO) V-«
TRANSMISSION A3
CVM 0 KC( -0 L83)
3ARPMFTER 7»0.bb MM HC(?1.1(. IN MC)
DRY HML« TEMP. ii. i DF.G c(7u.n DEC
BAG WFSULTS
HAG NUMBER
RIOHER INLET P MM. MJOdN. H?0)
RLo«£R iMLFT TFMP. DEC. C(DEC.
BLO«ER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLU* 3TD. CU. MF.TRFS(3CF)
MC .. .MPLE
MC BCKC.RD
co SAMPLE
CO BCKC.RD
CO? SAMPLF
CO? BCKGRD
NO* SAMPLE
METFR/RAHC.E/PPM
MFTF.H/RANGE/PPH
M£Tf R/RANGE/PPM
Mf rf R/RANC.E /PCT
MflF.R/RANCE/PCT
MF.1FR/RANGE/PPH
OUUTIOM FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO COHCCNTRAUON PPM
Cn? CONCENTRATION PCt
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
1ARLED-I I . VEHICLE tMISSIHN I'tSUCTS
FFPC
Tt3T NO. ? HUN
DATE U/15/7H
TIME
OYNO M'l. <;
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO. I
RELATIVF HUMIDITY 5h HCT
AHSOLUTt HUMIDITY «.<» GM/KG( t-?.S GRAIN•<
ACTUAL ROAD LOAL> t.t «»( If. J
JM-JJS-f
MOX MIIMJOIT* C.F.
1
COLD TRANSIENT
10,'
1.3
3/
3/
.!/
I.?/
bO.b/
1.3/
11
?.nj
.01
bl
1
3TAHILIZFO
JtSB.l (S7.P)
••I.* (11?.")
17770
23.S/ ?/ 23
ln.<»/ ?/ 11
et.n/ii/ ?o
.8/I3/ 1
7Z.n/ 3/ 1.30
^.^/ v ,o»
30.I/ */
».o/ ?/
in.?3
11
18
?9.?
30
1
MOT TRANSIENT
(S7.«l)
»'*.'» (11?.M)
IIMS1
KD.S (?13H.»)
8K.ff g/ Kb
n.i/ ?/ ii
bK.3/Ll/ «7I>
•»1.7/ ?/ 1.83
1.3/ t> .OS
|t/ ?/ 1
77
HC MASS
CO MASS CRAMS
CO? MASS CMAMS
NOX MA33 CRAMS
HC CRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
Co GRAMS/KM (CRAMS/MILE)
C&? GRAMS/KM (GRAM3/MKF.)
NOX ORAMS/KM (CRAMS/r-ILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY C8 L/lnnKM(MPC)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
MPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILC)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILF)
CO? CRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MtLf)
N0» GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY C8 L/JOOKM (HP'S)
cf.hB
asnB.3
h.Sl
10.Sb ( IS.18)
38*.b ( h)8.f)
1.13 ( 1.83)
17.?S ( 13.bl)
S.7» ( 3.57)
etos.s
5.18
.13 ( .en
.3b ( .S8)
311). h ( b?B.S)
.«•« ( 1.^3)
lb.72 ( It, 07)
b.lb ( 3.83)
1 ""< u' ,
*•'
.,7 (
l.lt (
JtS.3 (
.87 (
IS.na (
S.7» (
, 3
W
.7S)
5.1*)
SSS.b)
1.3^)
IS.h?)
3.57)
.13 ( t.sn)
lb.?7 ( 1H.J7)
-------
TAflUD-12. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
VEHICLE HO, U
VEHICLE MOnFi 7n rnon «UST»NC
ENSILE 1,« LMOJ CIO) V-»
TRANSMISSION Al
GV« U KOf .f) LHS)
RA*n«Ftf.<» MI.M MM MG(?q.i<« in HC)
0 1 TftMP. ?,.} OFC C<71.0 DFG ft
BAG RESULTS
BIG NUW«JB
DESCRIPTION
f>IF P
BLOwtB
CVS FL
HC SA
•*«. M?0(IN.
o "M. M^OflN. H?01
TF»f>. OFC. C(DFf,. F)
STf). CU. "ETSF.S(SCM
o
I
CO SA»P|.f
co Bc«r,on
CO? S»*PLF
Co? BCKr.hr>
Mf Tf R/RANfif /PP*«
HC CO'iCf».T9i t ION PPM
CO Cr"JCFNT>»ATION PP«
CO? CUNCEXTBtTION PCT
*OK CONCF'iTBtTION PPM
HC MASS r.oAi-3
CO M»S3 G"Au^
CO?
M0»
CO CP.AMJ/KM
CO? GSA»'S/«M
F\Y C« L /10n«M(MPr,»
CALCULATFn OI?T»NCE KM CMLFS)
COMPOSItE FTP SFSULTS
HC C«A"S/KM (GPAMS/MJLE )
CO G«»MJ/KM (G»AMS/MI|.E)
CO? GWAM3/KM
«Y CB L/inn*M
TF.ST NO, 1 BUN
DATE u/27/78
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
RAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
i
COLO TRANSIFNT
lb?5,k ( hl.O)
1173.? (<
21. S/ 3/ 215
I.}/ I/ 13
»1,V 3' 1001
,\f ^/ i
15. 3/ 2/ 2. PI
1.5/ ?/ .05
kl.1/ ?/ kl
!.»/ «/ *
b.?7
?f)1
15 3
1.08
51. 1
7.lh
b7*S7
2?0?,1
5.95
|,?S ( 2,01)
11,78 ( 18. Ok)
3*1.0 ( b!7, .
t.01 ( I,fc7)
17.15 ( 13. «b)
$.71 ( 3.1k)
30 PCT
5.5 GM/KGC 31. k
t
STABILIZED
lk?5.k (kl.O)
1173, ? (58,0)
13.3 (110.0)
101.1 (3bBR.B)
27, R/ ?/ 28
11. 0/ it 11
M.8/13/ 17
2.0/13/ 2
7?,0/ I/ 1.30
3.?/ I/ .OS
35. B/ 2/ 3k
l,k/ (/ 1
10,21
18
11
l.?k
31.1
1.08
5,3fc
2ill.i
S.Bk
.17 ( .28)
.87 ( l.3«)
381, B ( k(7.2)
.15 ( 1.52)
Ik. 72 ( 11.07)
k.11 ( 3.81)
US! HEIGHT
ACTUAL ROAO L
GASOLINE I"'':
000"ETFR !
CRAINS/LR) *0
3
HOT TRANSIENT
Ik25.k (M.O)
1171.? (Sfl.O)
13.3 (11U.O)
fcO.B (?117,S)
k2.J/ ?/ b?
1.7/ 2/ 10
7S.3/12/ 172
»*/12/ I
17. 3/ 3/ 1,«3
3,k/ 3/ .Ok
S3.0/ 2/ 53
l.k/ tt I
7.23
51
Ibl
1.78
51. k
1.B1
11.51
lIBb.b
5.13
.33 ,51)
2.0? 3.?»)
315. k SSb.l)
,B1 1.13)
11.1) 15.75)
5.75 3.57)
PSOJECT NO. n»«««J*001
KGt 3SOO LBS)
«.? KM( 12.1 HP)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F,
J,1*1* ( 5.S3)
17k.»<» (b05.77)
.•»5 ( I.SI)
lb.3b ( It,38}
-------
7
M
*>.
NII. IS
vrmctt HuntL »• FOOD MUSTANG
t.i L(ln* Cto) V-R
SMI? j 1(1" »'
GVH M K(.( .11
?»?.?« MM MCHJq.ll IN H(i)
t>nr HI/LB reip. i"*.1* DFi; C(b7.n DEC F)
BAT, Of SIH IS
HAT, S
I I UN
HUOHtK PIF I' MM. M<>ll k A H 5
Nil* -lASS M'AMS
(CHAM.S/Mtl f )
GHArt'S/^M
r )
HC
CO
M'>t
FUFL
CAl.Cl»LAT^O OlSlANf.t n 1
II'flSl U FTP M'SUi. IS
HC (irfAHIl/KM IGKAMS/NH F. )
CO CitAMS/rH (C.H»HS/MU.F )
TAIH.E D-13.VEHICLE EMISSION PESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. i NUN
DATE 11/88/78
TIME
OYNO NO. S
CVS NO. 7
HAU CAHT NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
PROJECT NO.
TEST MEICHT 1S11
ACTUAL ROAO LOAD
GASOLINE EH-371-F
ODOHETER SBfcb
3SOO IR3)
KM( li.3 HP)
b PCT
b.S CM/KC( tS.S CRAlNS/LB)
NOX HUHID1TY C.F. ,»1tl
NOx R.Q)
(110.0)
STABILIZED
lh?S.b (bl.O)
1»73
13
103bl
bl.S
81
1
IB
11
1
bS
1
.b/
.I/
•
-------
TABLE D-14. VEHICLE F.HI33IOM RESULTS
FTPC
D
I
VEHICLE NO. is
VEHICLE MODEL 78 FORO MUSTANG
tNGINF 1.4 L(302 CIO) V-«
TRANSMISSION A3
CVW a KG( -0 LB3)
9AROMETER 711.73 MM HG(J4.32 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. ZZ.8 DEC C(73.Q DEC F)
BAO «E3ULTS
PAG NUMHEK
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?0(1N. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. M20(IN. H20)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. CCOEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
cvs FLOH STO. cu. METHES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKCRD METER/RANGE/PPM
f" "AMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
I.L, oCKGwo METER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
CQJ BCKGHO METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
n NOX BCKGRO M£TER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM {GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM(MPC)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GHAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAH3/MILE)
coe GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CQ L/100KM (MPC)
3
»/78
TEST NO.
DATE 12'
TIMl
DYNC NO. S
CVS NO. 7
BAG CAMT NO.
RUN
PROJECT NO. ll-**43-OOl
TEST WEIGHT isii KC( 3500 IBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD t.i KN( 12.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-371-F
ODOMETER 5.7b (S^t.11*)
1.0? ( l.bt)
15.SB ( 11.7Z)
STABILIZED
IbZS.b (b«.Q)
(57.8)
.3 (110.0)
17777
.4 (}70b.3)
13.
HOT TRANSIENT
IbZS.b (b
llbB.l (57.8)
»3.3 (110.0)
10352
bl.l (2158.2)
18. Z/ 3/ 188
l.l/ 3/ 11
32. O/ 3/ 751
.!/ 3/ Z
13. I/ Z/ 1.4Z
l.S/ Z/ .05
bb.S/ Z/ b7
l.l/ Z/ 1
b.b7
1 73
718
1.87
bb.O
b.04
SI. 13
Z047.8
b.Ob
I.Ob ( 1.71)
8.40 ( 11. 3Z)
3bS.l ( 587.5)
1.05 ( 1.70)
lb.3? ( 11.11)
S.7S { 3. 57)
Zb.S/ Z/
10. 7/ Z/
lb.b/13/
7.1/13/
70. 8/ ]/ 1
rf.1/ 3/
11. 4/ Z/
.8/ Z/
10.13
17
q
1.25
11. Z
l.OZ
1.12
Z347.1
b.lt
.17 (
.18 (
388.5 ( bZ
l.OS ( 1
Ib.bZ ( 11
b.17 ( 3
Zb
11
lb
7
.Z8
.01
12
1
.Z7)
.Z4)
5.1)
.bt)
.lb)
.83)
57. I/ Z/
4.S/ tl
Bb.B/13/
l.B/13/
41. 7/ 3/ 1
Z.b/ 3/
54. I/ Z/
.«/ Z/
7.18
14
82
1.71
58.1
1.7Z
5.85
1414.4
5.3b
.30 (
1.01 ( 1
138.1 ( 51
.43 ( I
11.51 ( lb
5.77 ( 3
57
10
87
Z
.78
.01
54
1
.48)
.b3)
1.0)
.50)
.18)
.58)
-------
TABLE D-15.VEHICLE EMISSION RMULT3
fTPC
VEHICLE NO. H
VEHICLE "ODEL 7n FORD MuSTANS
ENGINE »,0 L(!0» CIO) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW o *r,( -n
BAROMETER »l«,l
DRY BULB TEUP.
MG(?0,Ok IN KG)
DEO cc7b.n oro
BAG RESULTS
BAT. NUMBFB
DESCRIPTION
BLO*ER OIF P MM, M?o(iN. n?n)
BLO»IR INLET P MM, M?otin. M?n>
BLOWER INLET TF«P. nee. CCPFC. F)
BLOivER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLO* STO'. CU. M£TRESCSCF)
SA»PLf
/PPM
HC
CO
CO BC*GRO METER/HANGE/PPM
C02 SAMPLE
en? BCXGRO
DILUTION
HC coNr.fNTRi ; ION PPM
CO CONCCNTRlTION PPM
CO* CONCENTRATION PCT
PP«*
MC
CO MA3J GBAMJ
CO? MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GOAMJ/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
HOX GRAMJ/KM (r.RAMS/ulLt )
FUEL COMSU"PTION BY c"
CALCULATED DISTANCE KH ("ILESJ
COMPOSITE FTP RfSuLTS
co GRA«S/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
co? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOK GHAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IOOXM
TEST NO, » RUN
DATE I?/ 5/78
TIME
OYNO NO. (
CVS NO. 7
RAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
i
COLO TRANSIENT
lb?S,fa (bt.O)
1*73.2 (58.0)
»3.3 (110,0)
inibo
kO,» (Z13»,»)
10. B/ 3/ 108
,B/ 3/ 8
30,b/ 3/ Ot<»
,1/ 3/ I
»»,S/ «/ 1,08
1.5/ it .05
b*,?/ ?/ b*
,0/ ?/ 1
b.HI
1.03
b3,»
b,b7
hJ.JB
b.OO
l.lb ( l.ib)
10, 18 17, b7)
371,2 507.3)
J.Ob 1.70)
lb.7» l».0b)
S.7b 3.58)
s.'ao c s!i5)
2.50 (583. 00)
.OB ( 1.58)
*» PCT
»,5 GM/KG( 31, S
2
STABILIZED
l«7l!? (Ss'.O)
11,3 (110,0)
103.8 ObbS.l)
2«.8/ ?/ (S
8,7/ «/ 0
»3.»/13/ 11
1.1/13/ \
70. b/ 3/ 1,28
3.S/ 3/ .05
38, »/ It 31
l.O/ Z/ I
10. »S
I/
1.23
37,5
1.01
•».k7
b.18
,lb ( ,2b)
,7b ( 1.22)
378,3 ( k08,7)
1.00 ( l.bl)
lb,22 ( It. 50)
b,17 ( 3.83}
TEST wFIGMT
ACTUAL ROAD L
CASOL1NE fM.3
ODOMETER 5
GRAINS/IB) NO
HOT TRANSIENT
1»73|? (SB|O)
«3.3 (110, 0)
10375
kO.5 (2137.8)
S0.8/ If bO
8,5/ it 0
!l/l?/ 1
^3. I/ 3/ 1,7»
j.b/ It ,0k
iS, OS Z/ 5H
,0/ 2/ I
7,50
52
1.70
53.1
1.83
11.03
1870.2
5.11
.32 ( ,51)
l.OZ ( 3, OP)
3?b,S ( Sc'S,'*)
.80 ( l.«3)
It, 11 ( U,b7)
S,7b ( 3,58)
PROJECT NO. n-l»*J- 001
KG( 1SOO LB1)
*,l K*( 11.3 HP)
NOX HUMIDITY C.f, ,830?
-------
T»BLtD-l6. VEHtCLE tMISSION
FTPC
VFMJCIE no.
VFMICIf MOOF.L
ENGINF
is
7» FOPO MUSTANG
LOO? r.io) v-a
Gv*
n «G(
BAROMFUR MS.lt MM HOC?1*.?? IN HG)
DRY miLB TF.MP. ??.« OEG cm.n OEG
BAG RFSUI.T!)
RAG NUMRFR
OEURIPTION
RLOHF.R OIF p MM. n?ou". H?O)
RL'1*"7" INuFT P MM. H?(1(IN,
INLET TFMP. OFG. CCOEG. F)
REVOLUTIONS
FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
SAMPLE MF.TFR/RANRE/PPM
BCKQRD MFTFR/RANGE/PPM
SAMPIE METFR/RANGE/PPM
METFR/RANGE/PPM
METFR/RANGF/PCT
BCKCRO METFR/RANC-E/PCT
METER/SANGE/PPM
ME'FR/RANGE/PPM
MC
MC
CO
CO
co?
r.n^
NO»
NDX
nil
MC CONCFNTHAT ION PPM
fl CnNCCNTRATION PPM
CO? CONCEN1HAIION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
Mf M»SS G&AM3
CU M»S3 GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS
HC GR4M3/KM (GRAM3/MILF)
CO G7AMS/KM (GRAMVILF )
TO? SPAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX CRAHS/KH (r,RAM3/MIl.F)
FMFL CONSUMPTION QY CR L/1 IIUKM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC OHAMS/KM (r,RAMS/MILE)
co GRAMS/KM (GRAMI/HILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (CRAMS/MILE)
TIIFL CONSUMPTION flY CH L/inOK« (MPG)
PROJECT NO. 1 !-'»••'» 1-niil
TEST NO. I
DATE IJ/?«I/?II
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
CV3 NO. 7
PAG CART HO.
RUN
TfST KF.ICHT ISIl Kfi{
ACTUAL ROAD 10*D <».? Kw( J?.^ MM)
GASDLINF EM-3?e-F
nO"l1F.TFR
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ?3 PCT
ABSOtUTF. HUMIDITY 5.7 GM/*r.< '•O.I CR»lNfl/t.n)
NOX MIlflOITT C.F.
COLO
lb?S.h
.••I (
1.7H (
371. ?
.RJ (
l.S/ V
?9.9/|I/
,?.f\ I/
I.I/ ?/
59.7/ ?/
1.8/ i/
?05
15
3bS
I
1.17
.OS
59.?
K.7S
1.18 { 1.10)
l.ln ( b.91)
37S.? ( bOJ.7)
1.0? ( l.bl)
Ib.lb ( 11.?9)
.79)
?.9R)
. tO>
l.H)
It.b7)
|b?S.h (bt.Ql
13.} (I III. (I)
177BO
101. 1 (3bBB.»)
35.O/
13.8/
IS
n
30
.S/13/
70.I/ 3/ I
3o'.g/ g/
1.7/ ?/
10.11
?fl.7
I.3S
1.7h
?37b.l
.?.? ( ,3b)
.?9 ( .1b)
3B9.1 ( b?S.l)
.Bl ( 1.30)
Ib.bh f 11.1?)
b.11 ( 3.HO)
HOT TRANSIENT
.b (M.O)
.B (SR.fl)
13.1 ( I 1 0.0)
hO.S
flt-.?/ ?/ Ob
10.I/ ?/ 10
93.S/1?/ ??9
.?/!?/ 0
91.?/ 3/ 1.77
3.I/ 3' .05
l.S/
7.1H
77
em
1.73
f..fi
1.13
.17 ( .7b)
?.»>9 ( 1.33)
335.0 ( 539.1)
.7? ( l.lh)
11.51 ( Ib.l7)
-------
TAPLFD-I7.VFMTCI.F EMISSION RESULTS
VEHICLE NO. IS
VFHJCLE MOOFL 78 FORD
».>» ionj riD) v-n
-n LOS)
GVW
ii KC.(
ORT
7H?.i<) MM HG IN HC)
EMP. f"».i» DFG C(7b.O REG F)
BAG RFSULTS
MAG NUMflFH
OIF P MM. H?O(IN. H?n>
INLF.T P MM. H?O(IN. M?O)
HirnFw iNi.rr TFMP. r>fG. cc>F.r..
fiLOWFrf HrvOLUTJONS
CV.S FLO* STO. fU.
D
cc
MC
HC
CO SAMPLE METFP/RANGE/PPM
co RCKi;nn
F.
MFTrR/«ANGE/PCT
NOX RCKGRI> ME TFR/flANGF/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
MC fllNCFNTRAT InN PPM
CU CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NO* CUNCFMRAUCW PPM
HC MASS G"AM3
en M»SS GWAMS
co? MASS n«AMS
NOX HAS3
HC GRAMS/KM
Cn GRAMS/KM (r.RAMS/MH.e )
CO? GRAMS/KM
FUFL. CONSUMPTION 8Y Cfl I./1 nnKM(MPG)
CALCULATED OISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC HRAMS/KH (f.PAMS/HUF)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MH.F)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MflE)
NOX GRAH.3/KM (GRAM3/MII,F)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CH L/IOOKM (MPR)
WU. I l-t
TF.9T Nn. a RUN
DATE ll/in/7R
TtMF
OY',0 Nil. f,
tv.; NO. 7
BAG TART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ?9, PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY S.b GM/KGC 39.3
1 ?
COLO TRANSIENT 3T»BHI7EO
IH71.J (SH.nl 1173.? (5«.P)
11.3 (tln.rO »3.* (llil.O)
lolhl 177R7
b«.9 (?iH9.9) lot. s (3>.9n.n
?0.?/ I/ ?o? 31. 9/ ?/ 3?
l.n/ 3/ in lo. 3/ ?/ 10
a».7/ 3/ 57? 9.b/13/ 9
.!/ 3/ ? .»/13/ 0
*t.9/ ?/ ?.00 71. 3/ 3/ 1.J9
I.I/ ?/ .05 3.?/ 3/ .05
58. b/ 2/ 59 30. 9/ ?/ 31
l.H/ ?/ 1 l.k/ ?/ ?
h.m in. is
1.1S l.?5
17. » ?9.5
*•. 79 1 . 1h
1S.H7 J.05
S.71 5.0»
I.IB ( 1 .<»n) .?? ( .35)
b.t.9 ( llt.77) .17 ( ..'7>
3«(l.? ( hll.7) 3BS.O ( b!9.S)
1 .no ( 1 .hfl) .81 ( 1,311
ib.R3 ( 13.97) ih.»7 ( i».em
5.7"; ( 3.S7) b.19 ( 3.051
TEST HEtGHT JS91 t(r.(
ACTUAL 90AO LOAO 9.?
RASOLINF FM-J72-F
OOQMETE1* S9l?
G»»INS/I.B) NOX MUMtOITY
1
HOT IRAMSIFNT
K73.? (f.i).0)
»1.3 (llil.nj
1 0 3 S b
bO.B U1-»H.3)
hh.H/ ?/ h7
9.5/ ?/ 10
9I..7/13/ 99
l.a/13/ 1
9b.A/ 3/ 1 .A?
).«« 3/ .Ob
93. 1 / ?/ H3
I.I/ ?/ »
'59'
J .77
•»«.?
e.ni.
b.bO
'""^o
.3b ( .S7)
1.1* ( l.B1*)
3»J.ri ( 5SII.3)
.73 ( 1.17)
1».7? ( 15.98)
5.77 ( 3.S8)
.? KM( If.t MP)
.«Sb»
1.79
372.18
(
?.RH)
8.RH)
\.H>
lb.07 ( 11. hO
-------
TABLED-18. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
VEHICLE HO. is
VEHICLE MODEL -o FORD MUSTANG
ENGINE o.o L( -0 CID)
TRANSMISSION A3
CVM 0 KG( -0 LBS)
73q.11 MM HGCZl.10 IN HC)
OHY BULB TEMP. 22.8 eta C(73.o DES F)
BAG RESULTS
HAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOHER OIF P MM. H?0(IN. HpO)
BLOHER INLET P MM. H?0(IN. M?0)
BLOHER INLET TEMP. DEC. CCDEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
cvs FLOH svo. cu. METRESCSCF)
SAMPLE
8CKGRO
SAMPL E
o
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO? SAMPLE
CO? 6CKCHD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX
METER/-RANGE/PPM
MEIEH/P.ANGE/PPM
MrTFR/f
-------
VEHICLE NO. IS
VFHICIE MOOfL 7B FOND MUSTANG
ENSINF n.n L( -n CIO) v-n
TRAU.V I-mO'l A3
UVW H KC( .(I IBS)
na.?i MM. nr,(^R.«s IN HI;)
Tft'p. ?s.u ore c' MM. M?0(|N. IVO)
«L"t,FR INLFT IFMP. BEG. C(DEG. F)
HI OWES wr vni:it IONS
CVS FLO* S'O. CU. *E-W3(SCF)
HC SAnPLF NFHR/RANRf/PPM
^L HC»>""0 ME TF P/HANCl-'/PPH
CO SAMPLE MFTFR/RANCf/PPM
TO
cn?
co? BCHr.wn MFIF.R/OANT.F/PCT
NU» SAMPLE Hf TFP/HANGt'/PPM
NOX BCKfiMI) MF TEP/RANCE/PPM
DILUTION FACTO"
nr roNCCsTRAi ION PPM
fU CO^Cf M"AT l(>w I'»'M
ro? CONCFKTOA i JON pr i
HO* CONCf Nl*»l ION fS*M
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS C.3AMS
cn;> MASS r.wAM.i
NDX MASS G°AM3
MC GRAMS/KM (r.RAM.^/MIl F)
Co GRAMS/KM (SnAns/nti E)
CO? CRAMS/KM (C.KAM8/MH.F)
MOX GRAMS/KM (HRAMS/MILE )
FUFL CONSUMPTION HY C« L/ J nuKMC MPR )
CALCULATfO OI'iTANCF KM (M1LFS)
COMPOSITE FT" RESULTS
HC GR*M!./l»31
1.
5?
q
111
17
.0
.51
.17
i.
11
i
15
31
•*
.37
.1b
1.
31
3
30
81
.3
.50
.13
Plbl.b 2171.2 IQtS. I
1.
11«
37?
1.
17.
5.
b
b3
H8
.;
11
1 1
83
.17
( 2.
( 31.
( 518
( I •
( 1?.
( 3.
b3)
35)
.8)
71)
91)
be)
1
.22
?.51
313.7
.f, b
17.00
b.?8
.11
( •
1 * •
( b33
( 1.
( 13.
( 3.
35)
01)
.5)
Oh)
83)
10)
1
,hO
5.18
ain.b
.81
15.31
5.82
.81
(
( B.
( 5bU
( 1.
( 15.
( 3.
17)
33)
.1)
35)
J7)
>>?)
k.77 ( 10.
.an (
.h? (
-------
TABLE D-20.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
VEHKLF NO. m
VFHICLE MODEL '8 FORD MUSTANG
!>.0 l.( -II CIO) V-P
A3
GVH M Kf"-( -o
BAROMFTEH 7ra.
DPY RtiiH TFHP.
BAG PESL'LIS
BAT,
o
K)
MM MG(2ii.7ii IN HC)
><,. n ore c(77.n DEC
OIF P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
BLOHFR PILE I P MM. H?0(1N. M?0)
BinwFH It'L^T 1F.MP. Of. I.. C(OtC. F)
HLOWF.R Rrv'JLIiriQNS
cv-5 FLOW ST&. ru.
HC SAMPI F MF TF.R/R»NfiE/PPM
HC •JCKr.RD MF. Ir R/RANGE/PPM
CO SAMPLE !•
CO IiCKBRO *
civ SAMPLI: MFTF.R/RANGF/PCT
co? ^cwo MFIFR/RANCF/PCT
NC'X JAMPI.F MFIFP/RANHF/PPM
NfX PCXPt'O Mf TFR/HANGF/PPM
Oil UT ION F ACTUR
HC CUNrTfiTPAlIfiN P^M
en CONCINTRAIJON PPM
co? coNcrsTR*iION PCf
^lOX ((iNCENTRA 1 ION PPM
HC *AS
CO MASS GRAMS
COP MASS r.WAMS
not M/sr. GRAMS
HC PRAM'/KM (r.
Co r.R*Mr,/KM
en? GHAMS/KM
NOX GPAM5/hM
FUFL CONSUMPTION K* C» I.
CA|_CUL*tfr; OISJANCF KM (Mli.fS)
Ff FTP BF3IIL I !»
HC RRAMS/KM (GRAKS/MILF )
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRt»'S/KM (GHAMS/MILF)
NPX CRAMS/KM ( GRAMS/'IILF)
FUFL CONSUMPTION PY CR L/inHKM (MPT.)
TEST NO. ? RUN
DATE 5/ 9/79
TIME
DYNO NO. s
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
1
COLD TRANSIENT
1M'0.2 (1,3.0)
1112.7 (5b.»)
13.3 (llll.n)
10359
S9.R (2111.7)
27. I/ 3/ 271
l.fl/ 3/ IB
b5.5/ 3/ Ib79
. 1 / 3/ 2
15. 7/ ?/ 2.01
1.3/ 2/ .05
If ,3/ 2/ IB
1.5/ ft g
fc.oi
259
157H
J.OII
17.11
B.93
109. bl
b.Ol
1.51 ( 2.19)
18.91, ( 30.51)
379. b ( blO.R)
1.01 ( l.f>7)
|7.t,fl f 13.30)
5.7R ( 1.59)
.58 ( .9J)
7.27 ( 1 1 .70)
379. 18 (bll.39)
.78 ( 1.2h)
lb.7R ( 11.02)
b7 PCT
13.9 GM/KC( <«7.1
?
STABILIZED
lhOO.2 (h3.Q)
1112.7 (5b.8)
13.3 (110. 0)
17778
1»2. b (3b23.7)
37. 8/ 2/ 38
lb.2/ 2/ Ib
7b.2/12/ 171
. 3/12/ 1
71. 2/ 3/ 1.35
2. 8/ 3/ .01
19. B/ 2/ 20
l.O/ 2/ 1
9.78
23
1Kb
1.31
18.9
1.3R
19.79
"Mis
.22 ( .35)
3.17 ( 5.09)
391.3 ( b31.1)
.bb ( 1.07)
17.07 ( 13,78)
b.2S ( 3.88)
TEST HEIGHT
ACTUAL ROAD L
GASOLINE t«-3
ODOMETER fa
GRAINS/LB) NO
3
HOT THANSItNT
lbOU.2 (b3.0)
1112.7 (5b . B)
» 3 . 3 ( 1 1 1) . U )
103»B
59.7 (2109.1)
10. b/ 3/ lOb
2. I/ 3/ 21
23. 9/ 3/ !>51
.!/ 3/ 2
13. 0/ 2/ 1.90
l.O/ 2/ .U1
38. O/ 2/ 38
.9/ 2/ 1
b.81
88
519
1.87
37.2
3.03
3b.07
1.75
.52 ( .HI)
b.21 ( 10. U1)
353.1 ( Sb8.2)
.82 ( 1.32)
15. Sb ( 15.12)
5.78 ( 3.59)
PHOJFCT NU. 11-1193-001
KG( 3500 Lt»9)
b031
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. I.117R
-------
TABLE D-2I.VfMICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
NO. i<;
VFHICLE MODFL 70 FORD
C 1.1 L ( 3M.? CID) V-R
-tl IHA)
CVM
II KC.(
711. SS MM HGC?R.1B |N MC)
M»'P. i^.ii of.a r.(77.!i or.R f)
B»G
D
M
><*(;
N
P Ml. M?0([N
M MH. rl. (U I tj . Hi>n)
ttii.fr ?FMP. OFT,, i; (iur.. F)
wt vrii ur I HNS
f.vs FLD** SID. in. MFiBi;s{.srF)
IT.
nc
r.n
C'V SA1PI.F
co? MC*I;HO
HtlY 3AMPI.F. IF It
'0 -IF
r.t /PC
r<(,f /PPM
nn.ui IHN f *c
HC
rn
PPM
AT ION PCI
(•'IK Cr>NCFf,r,
HC (SWIMS/KM (or?AS.t
("II
c (I II. 2 *>3.Q)
M17.B C.7.0)
13.3 (lln.P)
in3l>3
Ml. 3 (Hl<>8.?)
*7,B/ 3t ?7g
t.\t v ai
bS.b/ 3/ Ibfla
.?/ I/ «!
•»5.3/ ?/ J.O?
I.I/ Z/ .OS
17. gf if 17
1.7/ It I
h.117
?bn
1 < 7H
l.tR
H«;.R
1.IIS
lin.73
5.71
l.Sfc ( ?.%!)
li.nt. ( 3d. t>7)
371,. n ( bni.q)
.18 ( 1.5P)
17.51 ( 13. •»!)
«>.H1 ( 3. M)
hi PCT
13.0 GH/KG( Si.Z
*
STABILIZED
tbnn.z (bl.o)
1117. R (57.0)
11.3 (110.0)
177B7
1113.1 (3bS?.5)
31. J/ if 3<»
Z3.e/ I/ it
«».*/M/ ^b
,»/13/ 0
75. O/ I/ 1.17
?.?/ I/ .01
in. I/ e/ 10
1. 1/ if 1
1.71
IB
m
i.ii
11.0
1.10
10.11
1.07
.!• ( .«•
1.7/ if I
b.RI
Mb
177
l.Rb
3b.l
1.01
33.11
1.5t
.bl ( 1.1?)
S.7b ( 1.£b)
151. » ( Sfal.3)
.78 ( 1.25)
15.58 ( 15.10)
5.81 ( l.bl)
PKOJECT NU. ll-t
-------
UBLED-22.
VEHICLE NO. is
VEHICLE Monr.L 7* FORD
ENGINF i.<» LOne CIU) V
TRANSMISSION A1
Gv« n K MM HG(?9.nt |N HC)
HULB 1CMP. JS.b OFT, C(7H.n DF.G F .'
B»G
o
PA
DESCRIPTION
HLOWFR OIF P MM, Mi»0(I«. N?0)
BLOXF.B I'lLET P MM. M?0(IN. H?0)
RLOWF.P IHLET TEMP. OEG. UOEG. F)
PLOWFH R( VOLUTION3
CVS FLOH SID. CM. METRfS(SCF)
MC SA^PLC. MEH
HC RCXC.RD ME TFP/RANGF./PPM
Co S»MPl.E MHFR/RANGE/ppH
CO HCKC.HO MF TFR/«ANGE/PPM
cn? SAMPLE MF IFR/RANGF/PCT
en? ncxr-wn »f ^ I
NDX S»HPLF MF I
NOX nCT.RD MH Tf M/HANGE/PPM
oiuui ION
HC
CO CONCf NTHAl ION PPM
CO? CONCf NTRATION PCt
NOK Cd'TrNtRAt KlH CPU
MC MASS (iPAMS
co MASS CRAMS
r.o? MASS CRAMS
NP» MASS GRAMS
(GRAMS/MUF. )
HC
Cfl? C.MAMS/KM
NOX T,H»MB/KM (GfrAMS/HH F)
FtlFL CdNTrUMPI irj'i (»Y c» I
rALCUUATFD HISTANCF KM i
COMPOSITE FTP PfSUITS
MC GH«MS/KM
CO GRAMT./XM
CO? GHAM1/KM (GltAMS/MHF)
NOX GRAMS/KM (G(?AMS/MItf )
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB 1/lflflKM (MPG)
NO.
D»Tf.
TIME
nvNO NO.
CVS NO.
t«tS3JON RESULTS
FtPC
» BUN
BAT, CART NO. I
KFLATJVF
•"t-S.^S (SDH.HI)
.Ri ( 1.31)
IS." ( 1».»1>
13 PCT
s.i CH/KI;(
PMOJECT NU. M-11M1-OH1
TEST HEIGMl 15m KC( 3SHQ Lb9)
• CTU*L R0*0 1.0*0 S.? Kw( 1^.3 HP)
GASOLINE t«-3Bt-F
OOO^tTEH bibb
NOX HUMJOITt C.F.
COLD TRANSIENT
IbSI.O (KS.O)
1173,? (51. 0)
13.3 ( 1 1 n . n )
Ml.? (.»1?1,«)
21. ?/ 3/ I) >
1.3/ 3/ 13
51.17 I/ 1310
.!/ ?/ ?
11. b/ ?/ l.*3
I.I/ ?/ .0$
55. I/ ?/ SS
».3/ it 1
h.lb
?Ul
1?1|
!.«<»
s«.n
b. *7
'b.1S
?I17R.R
S.fH
i.?n ( i .«n)
11. S9 ( ?1. 1?)
3SD.il ( S7b.7)
i.na ( t .bi)
|h.1? ( ll.?."*)
5. an ( '.so)
STABILIZED
IbSI.O (bS.O)
1173.? (Sfl.n)
13.3 (1IU.O)
HU.b (3b54.1)
il.R/ ?/ 8S
)?.?/?/ 1?
bb.b/13/ bS
.B/1J/ 1
71. b/ 3/ 1.3H
(,7/ 3/ .01
2b. 7/ ?/ 27
».*/ Z/ ?
in.;b
11
bl
l.?b
?5.3
.»?
7.1?
?3S1. t
1.7b
.13 ( .111
LIR ( 1. '))
3HJ.1 ( b!1.«)
.7b ( l.?3)
lb.11 ( H.31)
b.?S ( l.»1)
MOT T«AN8It"T
ibsi.n (bS.
1173.? (SB.
13.3 (1 in
bn.e c?i?
•»3.(l/ ?/
11. tt Zl
81.R/11/
.1/1 1/
«
-------
T«BI.F D-23.
"isuus
Vf Hll.l !• 'ii. IS
VFHIf|F *i|l)l|. /« I PR') 1il
t'd t'lt «.•« if •«!!? i n«) «-«
ifAiij • iv in'i »<
cv» • KM -ii i.i»s)
' I» t- 7M.*' "II Hr-(?1'. I" t* HI;)
OPV C.I-LI. Tf'F. Pt.H DM; C(7»-.|. "F.I' F)
fc»< M. 0«l TS
i./.r MiUni N
MF tf W IP I ]( It
t>| I «< !.' H'f f «". Hi'lHU. . »l'l»
HI rut >. tr.iM r r"i. »i,'i|(l'.. M?U)
mowf" rt'tfi IF**-. i'»i;. i (MM;. F)
I'l r «i r. »r vn| in Ilil,-,
CV5 FllUi srn. CU. "FlUlSISffl
'•r. s»:i|'if rfi rcit/tfAi.i.r/cfii
C' pr.r.r.i'i. IF
_ co? SAMPI.F Mr it
i ro?
t» Nil*
Hf If H/fcANI.f
in'!
HC CliMff'.'OA I Iflf P^M
C'l CfiNC» ^TH• 1 UIF; pp-t
( c? ci"'crsf«»i in': POT
MI* CllUC' f iKA I I(!N PPH
Til MA^f,
re? «AST>
r/nx "*ss
KC (,WHI:>
cu
cnp
Nn«
M.IFL (•iitir.iiMpi JON
F )
i / innKM(M.f>r,y
CfiMi-'n<:i If r TP
FTPC
CO uR«»'5/«M (r,wA"s/"ii r )
CD? GR«HS/K* (r.HlhS/Mtl F )
Mlt GRAMr,/>>1 (C.RAM.VM|| F )
ru'ilti'iPI UIK nt ni L/
tF.ST Nil. S "UN
OATF. n/i»3/7<«
nVM) NI). 5
CVS Nil. 7
MAG CAWf NO. 1
Pft.ATlvE HiiHtOITY 5&(
i f
CHI 0 TRANSIENT MAPtLI/F
Itff.t (<•»•. II) |li»*.»
« 3.1 (11 II. n) «3.»
10 3 >ll )7
M . 1 (cMhli.n) HI S.I
?<••!•/ I/ i^S rf/.l'/
1 .*/ 3/ 11 11 .3/
51 .t / 3/ 1 ?hfl Hfl.fl/|
.?/ »/ S ,l»/l
»3.1/ ?/ 1 ,"»S 7J.7/
I.I/ */ .0» ?.7/
Sb.ll/ ?/ Sb j"t.b/
l.b/ ?/ Z 1 .»•/
I,.*? IP
? 1 *
1 1 qs
1.01 1.
11.1. ?1
7.S7 I
H5.3S ||i
71. 1 0
I)
)
ACTU'L HO*" L
r.AftiJLINE tl-3
MAIN.S/UH) NO
3
MOT THANSItNI
IbOn.Z (b3.U)
( Sb.C) I'P^.t ( Sb.U J
(11.
(D
11.3
( tin.
'O
7HII 1U3SB
(371i!
f,
?/
3/
j/
3/ 1.
3/ .
?/
?/
.1)7
17
RS
if
•?
.Of
. n
.7)
l>
11
A*
1
3?
n»
2S
i
M.i
07. H/
It. I/
7<». 7/
11. 11
l.l/
»1."*/
l.b/
1
1
e
77
Jtt
. 74
a. 5
i.74
».S7
• e)
HH
1?
bt
1
43
U»
*»
2
?)'7.V, ?»>.«.? ei)l?.7
h.3M *
i.Ji ( f.in) .ih
!•».>•» ( e3. 7?) |.t.b
37II.R ( S«b.7) 3^».b
l.n<» ( 1.75) .71
| h,91 ( |1. (U) lb.^7
S.7M ( ).bO) b.«>h
,1H ( . 70)
^."7 ( *.l^)
J7h.1l ( bOS.tin
.si
( .
( i.
( 1 3*
( 1.
( 13.
( 3.
It.)
b7)
.8)
l*>
Hi.)
««>
.•»7
».?Z
Jth.ll
. »'
15.1 1
S.HJ
•».81
( *
( *>•
( SSb
( L
( 14.
( 3.
Vb)
71)
• H)
4$)
^ ')
b°
PROJECT NU.
is-u nt(
L0»0 *.? K<
O LHS»
lif.3 MM
flUX HUHlDin C.F.
(HPi.)
-------
1AKLF D-24.vfH)m
VEHICLE
«C
(.v*
i r»-i> ri
*'
o *r,< .n
TFMP.
IN
RAG
o
KJ
Ln
HAf,
PM
HLP
nlF
*. H?n)
P uttt M?fl(IN. MPfl)
TFVP. OFG. C(rtF.r.. F)
irw/>»»«jr,f /PPM
CVS FLO* UTO'. CO. 'f T<»FS(SCF)
HC
CO
cn
Cn?
CO?
MOX
DILI)'
MC
cn
cn?
MC
CO
HC
Cn
NOX r,WA«S
FIJFL cn-»sii"PTin»'
C»lCUL«Tf 0
»CTf>/<4K4r.f /PPM
«( If R/P»HGt /PCT
MfTFO/OA'jr.l /PPM
0 *FTrW/RANr.E/PPM
FACTOR
JPM ppu
PPM
•'TUITION PCT
r,o»MS
r.pA»j
r.WAi.3
CP L/innKM(MPO
«w (MtlF3)
HC CWAMS/KM
CU GHAMJ/K-
cn? o«tAMS/«M
NOK CHAMS/x"
3.»»
UPC «
I
OATF
CVS NO. 7
MAG CART ».« (».».n)
l&po.n (bn.n)
*3.i (lin.n)
t.n.J
fn.s/ i/ ?ns
!.-»/ 3/ 1»
11.»/ I/ «11
.I/ I/ *
IS.I/ ?/ (.01
k7J1/ ^/ *b7
b.11
1.17
bS.»
h,7?
bS. 77
b.«
STABILI/FO
17771
?*>.S/
II. b/
51.0/1
.7/11/
70.
}l.b/ (/
!.«/ ?/
io. n
lb
».?»
30.n
S.k7
ir
So
I
3/ l,<«
,0«
II
PPOJKT NO.
1SS1 KC(
ACTUAL HOAO LOAD *.i
F"-J«5"F
b07h
JSHO UHS)
*l il.i H
NOX MUMIOITV C.F, ,"»1*.3
MtlT
t>o.r
10.3/ ?/
n,i/ i/
70.7/11/
.J/ll/
'b.RS 3/
3.1/ 3/
»i,b/ It
1.5/ ?/
3
kNJ
Cb7,n)
(110.0)
on
11
30)
1
us;
,os
71
1.78
"7.J
?.1b
in.is
f
c
f •
! T
(
(
1.1S
11. )b
37b.b
l.l"»
lb."
S.71*
.711)
b.Ob)
ilso
1* . 7^)
l.»7) .IS
I 1,?8) ,*0
bOS, 4) )7& ,11
l.^i) ,*7
13.85) Ik. If
3.1.0) b.?7
,'S)
l.»H)
bO».7)
1.3*)
1»,5*)
1.^0)
.*?
3,»b
?37.1
.lb
l».b^
s.o?
.».»)
S.S7)
SI?,K)
1.3fl)
is.n?)
i.b<)
-------
TA«LED-25. vf mete EMISSION RESULTS
E NO. is
MODTL 79 FORO
ENGINF «.i ino? ctnj V-R
TRANSMISSION Al
GVW o KG( -n l«s5
BAROMFTFR ? MFTFR/BANf,F/PCT
NOX S»MP(.F MFTfR/BANGf/PPM
NIX
MFTFP/RANC.F./PPM
Oil UT ION FACTOR
Mf CONCfitRATInN PPM
TO CONCfNTRATInN PPM
CO? CONtFN7PATTO»J PCT
NO* eONCFNTRATlnu POM
HC M*SS R°AM<)
ro MASI r.RAMS
CO? MA.15I 0"AMl
NOX MASS CRAM1
HC ORAM.1/KM (GRAMS/MJLF)
CO CRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MIL^)
CO? GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MRF)
NOX n°AMS/KM (GRA1S/MTLF)
F\IFL cnMSiiMPTlow RV cn t,/innKM(MPG)
CAICIILATFO niSTAMTF KM (MILES)
MC r.RAMl/KM
CO r,RAMS/KM
CO? r.RAM.VKM
NOX CRAM't/KM
FUFL cn>jauMPTinN BY CB I/IOOKM
FT«»C
TEST NO. ? BUN
DATF S/1S/7R
TIMF
OYNO NO. f
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTF MUMIOITY
1
C"LO TRANSIENT
m7b.» ((,».. 0^
nil flln.r.)
in31b
bO.S C?13S.J>
??.!/ 3/ ??)
I.I/ 3/ 11
Jl.fl/ 3/ S"H
.?/ M S
13. «/ ?/ 1.11
1 . I/ ?/ .1*
bl.h/ ?/ b*
.R/ ?/ 1
fc.Sl
?ni
tni
l.ii
b?.1
7.?^
bi.in
?) m.s
b.lfc
i.es ( ?.oi)
in.RI ( 17.5?)
3h?.S ( 583.?)
1.' 1 < 1.7b)
lh.37 ( 11.37)
S.R? ( I.*.?)
'.1«! ( .7?)
3,n7 f i.n)
11 PCT
b.3 RM/KGC 11.1
f
STARR IZEP
Ib7b.1 (S*.. "))
13.3 (I in.ni
177th
101.7 (3hb7.nl
i*.R/ f/ ?h
1?. I/ ?/ 1?
3b.3/13/ 31
3.S/13/ 1
7n.7/ I/ 1,?R
?.v »/ .ni
sn.ix ?/ 3n
l.n/ ?/ |
in. 13
1«S
3n
l.?i
?1.S
.M
3.M
Z351.3
5.1)
.11 C .»3)
,SR ( .Ml)
375.5 ( bni.?)
.R? ( 1.31)
Ib.OS ( 11. b?)
b.2h ( 1.R1)
PROJECT NO. 11-
TE.tT NFIRHT Ifll KG( 3500
ACTUAL ROAO LOAO i.? KM( i
R A SOL INf. EM-J«5«F
OnOMETFR bnR7
GRAINS/LB) NOK MUHIPITY C.F.
3
HOT TRANSIENT
lb7H.1 (hb.Q)
*i'.i dtn.n)
I03*n
••n.l (7133.5)
Rn.i/ ?/ BI
13. R/ ?/ 11
71.7/1?/ Ih3
I.5/1*/ 3
^b.t/ 3/ !.•!
l.n/ 3/ .ns
17. 5/ ?/ H
l.» / ?/ t
7.1?
b*
151
1.77
lb.5
2. in
10.77
1 151.1
i.m
.11 (
-------
VEHICIE no. is
VKHICLE MUDEL ?
ENGISF *.i L(ioa cro) V-R
TRANSMISSION A3
CVM o KGC -n LHS>
TABLE D-26.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. i RUN
DATE S/lb/71
TIME
DYNO NO. S
CVS NO. 7
BAR CAMT NO. 1
PROJECT NU. t
TEST HEIGHT 1591 KG( 1SOO IBS)
ACTUAL ROAU LQAO 1.Z KM{ 18.3 HP)
GASOLINE tM-JHfc-F
ODOMETER kll?
BAROMFTF,9 I**,
o«r Bum U»P.
MM HG(S1.30 IN HG)
s.ii PEC co;. n OEG
V
SJ
S»MpLE Mf
HCKRHO ME UR/^»NGF/PPH
PCKCHO HfTfH/H»Nnf /PPM
BAR RF3U1.TS
BAG N u M I) r R
OESC»IPTIQN
OIF P MM. H20UN.
INI.ET f MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
I-ILF.T TEMP. "EG. C(DF.G. F)
RFVOLUTIONS
FLOH sin. cu.
MC
MC
TO
CO
co?
Co?
NO» SAMPLE «F'ER/R»HGF/PPM
N0« HCKG'IO Mf ffR/RANGf /PPM
OILUTIUN F»CTJH
HC CONCF.HTq»UON PPM
CO COSCfNlR»IION PPM
CO? CONCFNTR*IION PCT
NOX CONCCN1R* I IQM PPM
MC MtA<; GRAMS
CO 1»S3 GRAMS
(Of MASS GW*MS
Nnx MASS r,WA«3
MC r.HAMr./KM (GRAM3/MILF.)
CO GPlM-i/xM (GRAMS/MlLt)
CD? GRAMS/KM (GHAMS/MIt F)
KOX GRAMS/KM (IJHAMS/MU E)
<"i)fu cnMSu«pJinN Rt c« L/inoKM(MPG5
KM
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 3-» PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 7.4 GM/KG( SS.O GRAINS/LH)
NOX MUMIOI1T C.F.
COLO TRANSIENT
JbPS.H (h^.Ol
1HH7.8 (57.n)
»3.1 (llll.0)
1C3IO
bl.3 (?Jh».»)
K.31
lltl
1.15
58.2
R.?1
81 .1b
2IHH.*
b.?»
I»ll5 ( *e'.77)
377.1 ( t (10.0)
I.OH ( 1.73)
17.?7 ( 11.b?.)
STABILIZED
.b (b<*.0)
11«7.8 (57.0)
»3.3 (110.0)
1771b
UIS.? (37U.b)
10.30
IS
11
1.2h
2b.7
.81
S.07
1.11
.01 (
307.1 (
.78 (
1.10)
>?'.!)
l.Zb)
5.:
( 3.bO)
Ib.t
b.i
( H.IS)
( 3.81)
HOT THANSItNT
(k-». 0)
(57.0)
din.u)
2* .
1.
11.
.
It.
1.
SB.
.
H/
j/
b/
I/
b/
I/
7/
b/
3/
3/
3X
3/
2/
?/
;/
{/
2H*
13
1812
2
1.18
.01
51
1
25
11
ts
.t/
.I/
2/
I/
.8/13/
.b/13/
71
t.
27
.S/
.S/
. 3/
.7/
]/
I/
2/
2/
25
J2
11
1
1.21
.0*
27
1
75
11
10
18
2
IS
.O/
.J/
2/
2/
.1/12/
.o/
• ™ '
.!/
.7/
L2/
3/
}/
2/
2/
7S
11
ilk
1
1 «M5
.01
IS
1
7.15
bS
1.81
11.7
it.30
H.k?
2027.1
1.78
i.'.
(
.Ub)
350.3 ( SkJ.t.)
.83 ( 1.13)
15.17 ( IS.SO)
5.71 ( 3.bO)
l IF
FTP Hf 3UI.T3
MC SIUM.VKM (GKAMS/MH.F)
CU UNO'S/KM (CRAMl/MIl.E )
CO? GRAMS/KM (r.P»MS/MHF)
N'U GMAHS/KM tGRAMS/^ILf )
F'JTU CUNSUMPTIOK b' CB L/IDOKM (MPr.)
.19 ( .77)
375.^1 (b01.2l|)
IS.3*. ( 11.3«)
-------
TABLE D-27.veHICL£ EMISSION RtSOLTS
FtPC
PCOJrCT h'J. U
VFMICU NO, is
VEHICLE MODEL t» FORO MUSTANG
ENGINE ».i I.Cine CIO) v-«
TRANSMISSION A)
GVM o *C( -n LB9)
BAROMfTER 7»2.70 MM HC(jq,?i» IN HG)
DRY RULH T£MP. ?Z.g DEC C(73.n DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAO NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?U(IN. MjO)
INLt'T P MM. H20UN. H?0)
I'lLFT TEMP. DEB. CCDEG. F)
REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOH 3TO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC
HC
CO
CO
SAMpLE
HCKGRD METER/RAwGE/PPM
SAMPLE METER/RANGF/PPM
BCKGRO METFR/RANGE/PPH
M
CD
co? SAMPLE M?TER/RANGC/PCT
CO? 8CT,"D MF.1FR/RAN3F/PCT
NOX SAMPLE ME'ER/RANUE/PPH
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENtRATIO'4 PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCt
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GHAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX M»SJ GRAM3
HC GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
Co GI?AMS/KM (GRAMS/M!LE)
CO? GMAMS/KM (GKAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GI7AM3/MRE)
FURL CONSUMPTION BY Cfl L/inoKN(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUF.L CONSUMPTION BY C(l L/innKM
TFST NO. 2
DAIF 5/17/71
TIMC
DYNO NO. S
CVS NO. 7
RAP, CAHT NO. I
RUN
TF.ST
ACTUAL HQAU LOAD
OOOMtTfR
»EL*TIVE HUMIDITY SO pr.T
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 8.8 GM/KCC hi.I G«AlNS/LB)
»C( JVJO
«.? KM( l?.l MP)
NOK MUMIOItY C.F. .•»»!«
1
COLD TRANSIENT
I bill), e (t>3.o)
1-»17.« (S7.0)
t3.3 (Ull.O)
bl,2 (21b3.0)
22.3/ 3/ 2*3
2.I/ J/ f\
13.1/ 3/ 1U57
.I/ 3/ 2
1.3/ f.f .05
58.B/ 2/ 51
1.7/ 2/ 2
3.71 ( 5.1»>)
375.IS (bfli.M)
lb.3? ( 14.41)
STABUtitn
1117.8 (S7.0)
»3.1 (110.0)
17715
105.1 (3712.7>
21.t.t I/ 2*
Ib.n/ 2/ Ib
53.7/13/ 51
2.2/13/ 2
72.8/ 3/ 1.32
3.2/ 3/ .05
i|s/ tt ?
MOT TMANSItNT
IbOO.j (b3.ll)
71
IS
*b
2
1U3S1
bl.l
71.3/ 2/
15.I/ ?/
ln.7/12/
.t/12/
»1.M/ 2/
2/
2/
1
»S
l.S/
b
.13
10
•
08
7
?ns is
.
11
bb
11B 47 2Kb
1.
S7
7
71
12
• »
.25
. 11
1.
27
5
28
•
f
0
in
71
21KS.R 2«S(.7
1.
12.
370
1.
Ib.
5.
b
25
?S
.8
(It
92
81
.33
( 2.01)
( H.7fl)
( 51b. 7)
( l.»5)
( 13. "D
( 3.bl)
S
.M
,12
312. b
.82
lh.81
b.2b
*
(
<
(
(
(
(
12
•
1.
b 11
1.
13.
3.
23)
41)
.b)
3?)
17)
81)
1.
41
j
14
80
•
•
•
2(111
*
.41)
2.52
3*1.5
.R*
11.17
5.82
•
(
(
{
{
(
(
S
33
bh
.5
in
•
i.
sss
1.
IS.
3.
hi)
(15)
.1)
iri)
72)
b2)
-------
APPENDIX E
SAAB FTP RESULTS FOR REGULATED AND UNREGULATED
EMISSIONS KITH FIVE TEST FUELS
-------
TABLE E-l. SUMMARY OF REGULATED EMISSIONS FROM 1978 SAAB
T. Ht
No.
21-1
21-3
21-4
2.'-l
2.' -2
2.'- 1
22-4
;s-i
21-2
24-1
.'4-2
24-1
24-4
2'j-l
2'»- 2
2r.-3
FTP Kniiyiinni tinto
KM- U3-F
EM- J7.1-F
KM- 173-F
KM- 1 / ' - f
Av.-l.i').'
TM- J74-F
KM- 174- F
KM- 174-F
V.f. 174- F
Av.-r,|.)..
i:M-37VF
KM- 11S-K
AV.T.I<)<-
KM-371-F
KM- 371 -F
tM- 171-r
tM-171 K
Avrr.VjO
KM-372-F
KM-372-F
f;H- 172-F
Avrrj'ii-1
Pay?
U-10-78
11-M-7H
11-17-7R
11 -.vi -711
11-12-7B
11-13-78
11-14-78
11-21-711
U-l'i-7H
U-ie,-7«
11-2/-7H
1I-2H-7H
12-04-78
12-OS-7U
11-2T-7R
11-30-7.1
12-01-7fl
II
n.
0.
Q.
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
o".
i).
IK
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
6.
l£
2O
17
17
17
"lif
14
If.
1<*
10
H.
17
yil
12
I J
12
JA
li
12
12
il
"12
CO^
2.71
2.97
3.D1
i'.TM
7.1H
2.19
2, 3'»
2 . .W>
7. in
J.f.4
2 . S5
2.40
2.47
2.42
2.4)
r.43
1.03
1.92
1 . ')()
j . (If)
."_t_2/
i,
o.
ii.
o.
o.
II.
I).
o.
II.
0.
II.
0.
0.
o.
0.
II.
0.
0.
(i.
0.
0.
0.
6~.
"Km
14
lft
H.
l)'l
14
II,
14
1',
.17
"'
111
17
1H
10
U
lri
11
12
12
12
14
13
7
4
1
1
2
4
3
2
3
1
1
1
2
1
3
2
2
2
2
2
2
lie rv,i]
1411.
.7f>
. r>
.7T
.(.1
.7(1
.',)
. 14
.77
.24
.01
.IIS
.B4_
.Its"
.46
.V>
.74
• !'.L
.0'.
.60
.07
.fll
.41
|Kjr«l Iv
H- Knlu
IMl'HIlt,
•1
_1IM; _,J."^:' '
s.ni ni.it.*
j.
2.
3.
11..
<>.
I.
0.
4.
j
2.
3.
O.
1.
2.
..
2.
J^
3.
'.!
4H
(HI
03
32
7t
.'.'I
l'>
„
Ti
00
>)v>
94
1?
is
..
3'J
7S
07
', .
''.
'»•
21.
12.
4.
9.
7.
5.
4..
4.
r,.
1.
1.
5.
4-
..
4.
6.
5.
U
o f
'"
,.,.
Jf,«
Mi
II. >
'''
44
IV
'.2
4')
(.n
61
Ml
...
4«.
0'>
M
n
12
11
n
ii
n
n
n
ii
11
n
n
I't
i'i
it
11
ii
1 1
n
1 1
lo
fi
n(i i
. 7(.
.74
• '•''
. tw>
.'. 1
.4i<
'.n
• ''.I.
.f. 1
.1(7
.'•2
. 'Hi
. 41
. ."'
.1"
. Pi
.("<
. n
.74
.07
.
-------
TABLE E-2. INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBON EMISSIONS FROM 1978 SAAB
Tost.
No.
21-1
21-2
21-3
21-4
22-1
2?-2
22-3
2->-4
23-1
2)-2
24-1
24-2
24-3
7 24-4
Ul
25-1
2',- 2
2'.- 3
ITP Individual Hydrocarbon FnlBUlons Rate*, ntgAm
Fvx-1
EM-373-K
EM-373-F
FM-373-F
fcM-373-F
Average
EM-174-F
KM- 374- T
KM-374-F
KM-374-F
Av.-ra.jo
EM-37'.-F
EM-3T.-F
Av,.r,v,p
llM-371-f
KM-371-F
EM-371-F
EM-371-F
Average
KM- 372 F
t'.M- 3/2-K
KM-372-F
Aver.V)*'
Date
11-1U-78
11-11-78
11-17-78
11-20-78
11-12-7H
11-13-78
11-14-78
1 1 - 2 1 - 78
11-1S-78
11-15-78
11-27-78
11-28-78
12-01-78
!2-0'.-78
11-29-78
1 1-30-7B
12-01-7"
Mcthann
33.56
34.30
32.25
32.06
33.04
29.02
30.14
31!. 01)
3D . 70
30.34
30.57
30 . 7l)
30.64
21.00
20.69
19.33
20 . f. 3
20.41
r..-u
I7.(.'.
1'. .66
16.41
Ethylrnu
15.85
15.16
14.98
15.47
15.37
12.43
1 3 . 1)0
15.10
15.47
14.20
15.10
17.90
If. 50
0. .19
9.57
9. 13
10.75
9.46
8.26
7.71
7.77
7.91
Ethane
5.90
6.15
5.34
4.97
5.59
4.54
4.72
4.66
4.47
4.60
4.60
5.28
4.94
3.4B
3.54
2.67
3.04
3.18
2.98
J.44
2.73
2.73
Acrtylone
2.61
2.49
2.80
2.r>5
2.61
2. 36
2.36
3. 48
2.S1
2.6H
3.04
3.3C,
3.20
1.55
1.99
2.11
1.93
1.90
1.74
2.11
1 .62
1 . H?
1'roj.anff
0.68
1.30
0.87
1.74
1.15
1.1"
O.^ill
0.7r.
O.6H
(1.78
1.43
1.37
1.41)
0.44
0.31
0.19
0.31
0.31
0.(>2
O.HI
0. 17
O.hl)
Propy lone
6.40
6.59
6.46
6.2J
6.42
S.47
5.65
C.09
6.03
'..HI
5.53
6.S2
6.03
5.97
6.77
5.n4
7.83
6.60
5.90
4.91
'..'.3
5.4'.
Benren*
16.34
15.04
17.27
J2.12
15.19
10.00
12.06
14.17
11.31
1 1 . 8'J
13.98
14.r,o
14.29
6.R4
7.511
7.27
8.51
7.55
6.65
6.0)
6.40
6. 36
Toluent'
9.88
9.76
10.50
9. 3B
9.08
0. 9%
9.82
11.81
6.77
9.34
11. 11
I1.H1
I2.4<>
10.87
12. 3H
11. ni
1 3 . H6
12.21
10.?'.
II.H'I
11.18
111. 11
-------
TABLE E-3. ALDEHYDE EMISSIONS FROM 1978 SAAB
fTP Al(Vliydcs Emission* Rntrn, mg/Km
n
Ti-st
No.
21-1
21-2
21-3
21-4
22-1
22-2
22-3
27-4
23-1
23-2
74-1
24-7
24-3
24-4
25-1
25-2
25-3
MctSiylPthyt
run 1
EM-373-F
EM-373-T
CM-373-F
EM-373-F
Avrr.vjt'
KM- 374- F
FM-37'I-F
KM- )74-F
tM- J71-F
Avcrngc-
LH-37'.-F
KM-.17',-F
AV..T.KJ..
r.M- 3 7 1 - F
KM-371-K
t:n- ni-r
W- )t]-K
Avrr.V|<-
TM-372-F
EM-372-F
EM-372-1'
Avoraqu
Drtto
11-10-78
11-11-7B
11-17-78
11-20-78
11-12-7H
11-31-711
11-14-78
11-21-7B
11-15-78
11-16-78
11-27-78
11-20-71)
12-04-7(1
12-(lr.-7n
11-29-78
11-30-78
12-01-78
Forn-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
o
I)
(1
0
0
0
_
.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.44
.31
.06
.12
.23
. 1')
.(Ifi
,2S
i 19
. 17
.50
. 19
.35
.19
.19
.19
.37
.25
.21
Acot-
0.19
0.31
0
0.25
0.11
0
0.06
0.19
0.06
0.08
O.Oli
0
0.04
----
0.31
0.06
0.19
0.19
0.31
0.19
0.23
Aci'tom-*
0.12
0
0
0
0.03
0.06
0.19
0.31
0
0.14
0.06
0
0.03
0.12
0.06
0.09
9
0.12
0
0.04
Isobutyr
0
0
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Koton^
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
0
1)
0
0
0
0
_.
-
O
0
0
0
O
0
0
.19
.12
.OH
.17
.06
.06
.06
.06
.06
.06
.19
. l.»
. K,
.12
.19
.06
.12
Croton- Hoxan-
0
0
0
0
O
0
O
0
0
0
0
0
-.-- U
-_--
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.25
.19
.12
.12
.17
.12
.06
.12
.08
.12
.(16
.09
* —
.;")
.19
.22
.19
.25
.12
. 19
Benzene
0.12
0.99
0
U
0.28
0
1)
0.31
0
O.OH
t)
0
0
(l.lll
0
0.41
0.25
O
O.06
0. Ill
Total
1.31
1.80
0.18
0.61
O.'tH
".49
0. 31
1.1H
0.41
0.60
).B2
0. 31
U.57
l.m
0.62
1.7'j
n.75
1.24
D.6R
O.B'I
IncImloi nctoloin *md propnnol
-------
TABLE E-4. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
PROJECT NO, H-»»<«J-OQJ
VEHICLE NO. 310
vtnjcLE MODEL 79 SAAB
ENGINE 1,0 l(iil CIO)
TRANSMISSION A]
CVM Q KCf »0 UBS)
BAROMETER 738.8* MM HG(?1.0<» IN HC)
DRY BULB T£Mp. n.i OEC C(7"»,0 DEG F)
BAD RESULTS
BAG NUMflCR
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER oir p MM, H?otlN.
BLOWER INLET * MM. H?OUN,
BLOWER INLET TEMP, DEO. C(DEC
BLOWtR REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. M£TRES(SCr)
MFTEP./RANGE/PPM
w
i
Ul
MFTER/RANGE/PPM
MfTER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
MFTER/RANGE/PCT
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRO
CO SAMPLE
Co BCKGRI5
CO? SAMPLE
cot BCKGRO
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKQPo
DILUTION MCTOR
HC CONCfNT«»TION fPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
Co? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASJ GRAMS
CO MASS G"AM3
CO? Miss GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC CRAMS/KM
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? CRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION ev ce
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MJLES)
COMPOSITE. FTP RESULTS
HC 5RAMJ/KM (GBAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMVKM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMJ/KM (CRAMS/wiLE)
NOX GWAMJ/HM (GRAMS/MILE)
fdll CONSUMPTION 9Y CB L/10QKM (MPOJ
TEST NO, 1 RUN
DATE 11/10/71
TIME
DVNO NO, s
CVS NO, 7
BAG CART NQ, 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
1
COLD TRANSIENT
lSbS.7 (bl.B)
I'M*. 8 (55,7)
38. 1 ( 10!, 0)
1037*
b?.l (21*1.8)
10. 1/ It 101
I,*/ }/ 11
*!,)/!!/ 15b
,5/ll/ I
11, 1/ ]/ 1 ,5,1
Z,8/ ]/ ,0V
I*.*/ «/ 11
,8/ */ 1
1,10
18
1.50
13.7
1.52
31.11
1707. b
l.bO
,b« ( .11)
5.11 ( l.ll)
Z18.1 ( 180,2)
.88 ( .15)
13. 11 ( 17.11)
5,7? ( J.Sb)
17 PCT
10, Z GM/KG( 71,1
Z
STABILIZED
15b1.7 (bl.l)
1111,8 (55,7)
38.1 (102.0)
17801
10k, 5 (I7bl,1)
18, S/ Z/ 18
11, 1/ Z/ 2
83,b/ll/ 13
l,b/13/ I
50, k/ }/ ,88
3, I/ 3/ ,05
e,b/ >/ i
,7/ I/ 1
11,08
7
,11
1.'
,1b
*,83
UZ7.3
.-'
.08 ,m
l.bl t.58)
ZbB,8 1Z7, 7)
.Ob ,10)
ll.lb ZO.SZ)
b.lZ ( 1,80)
TEST HEIGHT 13b* KG( 3000
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 1.1 KM( 1
GASOLINE EM-373-7
ODOMETER 70?
GRAIN3/L8) NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
3
NOT TRANSIENT
ISbl, 7 (bl ,8)
1*11,8 (55,7)
3B.1 (102,0)
10351
bl.l (Z187.D
Z7.4/ z/ as
a, i/ */ a
88,1/lZ/ Z01
,1 til/ 1
71, Z/ 3/ 1.3S
},3/ 3X ,05
I.I/ Z/ *
.!/ Z/ 1
'.7b
18
1,10
8,1
,M
11,11
1171,7
.17
.11 .18)
I , S 3 '4,07)
151, 1 llb.1)
.17 ,Z7)
11, Z1 Z0.1Z)
S.71 3.55)
170,7» (»JS,b«)
,l» ( .?*)
li.7b ( ?0.00)
-------
VEHICLE NO. 330
VEHICLE MODEL ?s SAAB
ENGINE ?.n L(12l CIO)
TRANSMISSION AS
tVH 0 KG( -0 UB3)
BAROMETER 7H'».<»8 MM HG(3
RLOWCR REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRES(SCF)
TABLE E-5.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. 8 RUN
DATE 11/11/71
TIME
DYNO NO. S
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
W
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKC.RD
CQ SAMPLE
CO BCKGHO
CO? SAMPLE
CO? eCKCRO
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGHO
MtTER/RANGE/PPM
MF.TEVRANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
MFTER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
MftEfT/RANCE/PPM
MEIER/RANGE/PP .
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCtNTRAUON PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCF.NTRATION PPM
HC M»SS GRAH3
co MASS GRAMS
COa HASS GRAM3
NOX HASS GRAMS
+IC GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
co GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/K.ILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUF.L CONSUMPTION BY ca L/IOQKM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (CRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM (MPG)
PROJECT NO. 11-MS3-001
TEST WEIGHT 13k1* K6< 3000 IBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD f.V *N( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-J73-F
ODOMETER 720
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 57 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.1 GM/KGC 7V.0 CRAlNS/LB)
NOX HUHIDITT C.F.
COLO TRANSIENT
Ib00.2 (b3.0)
1173.2 (58. 0)
11.7 (in7,0)
103bb
bl.b (2171,7)
Bb,5/ 2/ 8b
11. O/ 2/ 11
11.3/11, ISb
1.0/U/ 3
8b,2/ 3/ l.bO
3. 1/ 3/ .OS
11. b/ 2/ 20
l.S/ 2/ 2
8.11
71
131
1.5b
18.3
2.b1
30.12
1755.8
2.11
.Ib ( .71)
5.38 ( B.bb)
305. 1 ( 111.1)
.37 ( .51)
13. Vb ( 17. HB)
5.75 ( 3.57)
STABILIZED
Ib00.2 (b3.0)
1173.2 (58.0)
11,7 (107.0)
17817
105.1 (3731.2)
20. S/ 2/ 20
12. 8/ 2/ 13
87.2/13/ 88
2.0/13/ 2
52. 2/ 3/ .11
3.S/ 3/ .05
3.0/ 2/ 3
1.2/ 2/ 1
11. Sb
q
83
.Bb
1.1
.52
10.18
lbbb.8
.17
.08 ( .11)
l.bS ( 2.bb)
270.1 ( U5.0)
.Ob ( .10)
11. bb ( 20.17)
b.lb ( 3.83)
HOT TRANSIENT
lbOO.2 (b3.0)
1173.2 (58.0)
11.7 (107.0)
10373
bl.b (2l7b.h)
31. ?/ 2/ 32
11. 7/ 2/ 12
13.1/12/ 227
.?/!?/ 1
7b.3/ 3/ 1.31
3.0/ 3/ .05
1.3/ 2/ 1
l.l/ 2/ 1
1.1S
21
21b
1.35
8.3
.75
15.18
152b.O
.Ib
.13 ( .21)
2.b<* ( 1.33)
2b5.1 ( 127.1)
.17 ( .27)
11.53 ( 20.11)
5.75 ( 3.57)
.18 ( .?8)
?.71 ( «.3h)
87fa.30 (<*«<».Sb)
.15 ( .ZS)
ie.no ( 11.bi)
-------
M
I
VEHICLE NO. no
VEHICLE MODFL 78 SA»8
ENGINE ?.o L(IS1 CIO)
TRANSMISSION *3
GVH n Kr.( -n LRS)
BAROMETFR 7th. ?s MM Hp,(?i.3R IN HP,)
DRY HULM IFMP. ?n.h DEO crhi.n npc F)
BAG
RAP.
TABLI E-6. VfHICLF EMISSION RESULTS
FT PC
TEST NO. XJ KIIN
RATE 11/17/7H
TIHE
DYNO NO. S
CVS MO. 7
RAG CAWT NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY »o PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY b.O GM/KP.f
iF f MM. H;(>UN. H?0)
m.FT P MM. H^ruiN. H?O)
• 'M* IHLFT IFMP. OFP,. r.{OFP.. F)
C.- ' I.KW STD. CU.
HT lAMpLF MEIf R/RANGE/PPM
MC Rcxr.Ro MFIFR/RANP,F/PPM
CO SAMPLE MF.lFR/RtNGF./PP*
CU PfKP.RO Mf IFH/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE MFTFR/RANP.E/PCI
co? RCKP.RO MUER/R^NGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE MFTFR/RANGF/PPM
NUX
METF.R/RANGE/PPM
OlLUflON FACTOR
HC CONCflNTRA't IPN PPM
rn coNCFuTRATtnN PPM
en? coNCf.MrtAf ION ppr
NOK CONCFMHATION PPH
HI: MASS (;D«MS
CO MASS GHAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
Nl)y MASS P.HAM3
HP. GHAr'S/KM
CO P,n»MS/KM
CO? URAMS/KM
NOX RRAM3/KN
(r,RAMS/MH F)
(GR4MS/MII.F)
(GRAMS/MILE)
(GRAMS/MHE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CH L/ 10IIKM(MPP,)
CALCULATED DI3TAMCE KM (MU.ES)
COMPDRIIF. FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (C.RAMb/MU f )
CO niiAHH/KM (r,(?AM-3/MILE)
Co? (.RAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILF)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MJLF)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY LC l/lflllKM fMPG)
PROJECT
I J-
TFRT
ACTUAL RO/0 LOAD
P-AFOLINE EM-373-F
851
K(;{
R.t
11.1 HP)
GHAtNS/LB)
NOX MllMlni IY C.f .
COLO TRANSIENT
1 b?5.h (hH .n)
1H73.2 (Sfl.ll)
""t.t ( 1 1 j.n)
11137?
bl.2 (2Jhn.s)
K'.S/ 3/ IMS
?.?./ 3/ ??
2S.s/ v 511
,3/ 3/ 7
»7.o/ 3/ l.h?
3.2/ 3/ .IIS
»««.»/ ?/ ?0
e.i/ s/ 2
7.1h
Rh
SMI
1.57
17.1
3.M3
31. Rb
17hl ,h
I .Rl
.S? ( .Rt)
t'.IO ( ll.JP)
Sdt.i ( win.fi)
.31 ( .SO)
13.51 ( 17. 3b)
S.7R ( 3. Si)
STABILIZED
|b?5.b (b».0)
H73.J CSR.P)
»t.t (112.0)
1 7 fl |J h
UIS.O f3701.0)
22. h/ ?/ c-3
IB.;;/ 2/ ifl
75.3/13/ 7»
I . 1/1 3/ f
si.s/ 3/ ,m
3.0/ 3/ .05
t .I/ 2/ 5
2.0/ 2/ 2
I'.Rli
b
70
.as
3.D
.3t
P.5R
Ibll.O
.5'
.Ob ( .01)
1.31 ( ?.23)
2h5.1 C »2b.5)
.01 ( .!•»)
11. H2 ( c?t).hl)
b.11 ( 3.8S)
HOT IHAHSIfNT
lb?S. h (hH .0)
M7.1.2 (SB.fl)
•<».•• (112.0)
103SR
hl.l (2157.2)
33. 3/ 2/ 33
1?.1/ ?/ 1»
b?.3/ll/ ?S3
.S/l I/ 2
71. »/ 3/ 1.35
3.7/ 3/ .Ob
1?.2/ 2/ 12
2.t/ 2/ 2
1.70
; ]
2H?
1.3M
in.n
. 73
I7.lt
It 57. 7
1 . >1?
. 1 1 ( .2U)
?.1fl ( ».71)
2S?.b ( 1(1 h.S)
.!» ( .PR)
ll.OH ( ?1.3D
5.7? ( 3.51)
?n.CI3)
-------
VEHICLE NO. 330
VEHICLE MODEL 78 SAAB
ENGINE 1.1 L(30? CIO) V-8
TRANSMISSION A3
CVH 0 KG( -0 LBS)
BAROMETER 7*8.51 MM HG(?1.17 IN HC)
DRY BULB TEMP. 18.1 OES C(kb.n OEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAR DUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?OCIN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. HJOUN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEG. F)
RLOHER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
METER/RANC,E/PPM
METF.R/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
MFTER/RANGE/PCT
MF.TFR/RANGE/PCT
MF.TER/RANGE/PPM
METFR/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PCM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
COt CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
MC MASS GRAM3
CO MASS G3*M3
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRMS/XM (GRAMS/MlLE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GSAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION KY CB L/100KM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MH.ES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO 5RAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM CGRAMS/MILFJ
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IOOKM (MPO)
TABLE E-7. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
fTPC
TEST NO. * RUN
DATE U/eO/78
TIME
OYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
M
CD
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGRD
co SAMPLE
CO BCKGRO
co? SAMPLE
CO? 8CKGRO
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRO
PROJECT NO. 11-1113-001
TEST HEIGHT 13H KC( 3000 L8S)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD 8.1 K*( 11.1 HP)
GASOLINE EM-373-F
ODOMETER B8b
RELATIVE HUMIDITY ss PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 7.J CH/KC( Sl.l 6RAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. .8118
COLD TRANSIENT
ibas.t, ui.o)
1173.Z (58.0)
13.3 (110.0)
10371
bl.b (8175.1)
.17 ( .88)
3.01 ( 1.81)
b8.ll (131.70)
.01 ( .11)
II.bD ( 7Q.lt)
STABILIZED
lb?S.b (bl.O)
1173.8 (SB.O)
13.3 (110.0)
1771k
IDS.7 (3733.1)
HOT TRANSIENT
Ib85.b (bl.O)
1173.8 (58.0)
13.3 (110.0)
103b7
bl.b (?171.b)
8b.
11.
81.
.
81.
3.
1.
»
I/
b/
I/
?/
I/
S/
b/
I/
1
3
tl
I/
3/
3/
3/ 1
3/
i/
8/
8.85
77
Sib
.SI
1.5
8.78
1.11
87
18
577
S
.Sb
.05
10
0
IS.
10.
I/
S/
8/
Zl
78,b/13/
1.
si.
3.
1.
1707.8
9
t>.
817
.
13.
5.
17
81
.3
18
?1
71
1.01
(
( 10
.7b)
.lb)
( 178.1)
(
( 17
( 3
.88)
.81)
.57)
m
1.
8bb
.
11.
b.
8/13/
B/
S/
o/
I/
11
,
T
3/ .
3/ t
I/
I/
.71
b
71
IS
• *
.37
.11
lb
10
78
1
10
OS
1
0
33.
1.
b8.
•
78.
>.
7.
•
I/
7/
8X
8/
33
10
b/11/ 8SS
8/11/
7/
I/
I/
1'
q
3/ I.
3/ .
8/
8/
.15
85
1
38
OS
7
0
813
1SH.O
Ob
17
.1
03
18
11
.lb
c *
( 8.
( 188
C •
( 80.
( 3.
1 '
i')
.7)
01)
11)
IS)
•
1.
850
•
10.
7 .
1.
7
17
113
IS
01
.0
11
10
71
87
.0
.88
.»*
' . ?
.71
( t
( 1.
{ 108
( •
( 81.
( 3.
85)
81)
. 3)
81)
51)
57)
-------
VEHICLE NO. 330
VEHICLE MODEL 7s SAAB
ENGINF ?.n L(t2i cio)
TRANSMISSION *a
CVH a KC( -o LBS;
BAROMETER 7f-a.7>» MM HG(2i.3b IN HO
DRY Bl'l.3 TEMP. JJ.Z DEC C(7?.tl DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAR NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER DIF P MM. H?0(IN.
BLOHER INLET
TABLE E-8. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. 1 RUN
DATE 11/12/71
TIME
OYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
BAG CART NO. 1
PROJECT NO. 11-1113-001
H?0)
P MM. H?0(IN. H20)
BLOHER INLET TEMP. DEC. C(DEC. F)
BLOKER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOH 3TO. CU. METRES(SCF)
HCKGHD
SAMPLE
M
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO? SAMPLE
CO? 8CKRRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX 8CKGRD
METER/RANGF/PPM
METFR/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANOE/PPM
METFR/RANGE/PPM
METFR/RANGF/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MAS3 GRAMS
CO? MA33 GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
co GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GHAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM(MPG)
CALCULATFD DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP REJULT3
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GHAM3/KM (r.RAM3/MILF)
CO? CRAM3/KM (GSAMS/MlLE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAM3/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM (MP6)
TEST HEIGHT 13b1
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD
GASOLINE EH-371-F
ODOMETER 117
KGC 3000 L8S)
8.1 KN( 11.3 HP)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY bS PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 11.1 GM/KGC 77.1 GRAlMS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0115
COLO TRANSIENT
1571.8 U2.0)
1118. b (51.0)
10. b (105. (1)
10351
bl.7 (2178.1)
82. I/ 2/ 82
15. b/ ?/ lb
8S.O/I1/ 101
.1/11/ 3
83. I/ 3/ 1.55
3. I/ 3/ .Ob
15. 2/ 2/ IS
l.O/ 2/ 1
8.31
bl
381
1.50
11.3
2.11
27.37
Ib12.0
1.71
.12 ( .b8)
1.75 ( 7.b1)
213.5 ( 172.2)
.30 ( .18)
12.10 ( 18.23)
S.7b ( 3.58)
STABILIZED
1571 .8 (b2.0)
1118. b (51.0)
10. b (inS.O)
17805
lOb.l (3717.1)
18. 7/ 2/ 11
11. I/ ?/ 11
bb.8/13/ b5
1.1/13/ 1
51. b/ 3/ .10
3. V 3/ .Ob
2.S/ 2/ 3
.b/ 2/ 1
11.71
b
bl
.81
1.1
.31
7.51
Ib3b.1
.10
.Ob ( .01)
1.23 ( l.*8>
2b5.2 ( 12b.7)
.Ob ( .10)
11.11 ( 20. b2>
b.17 ( 3.83)
HOT TRANSIENT
1571.8 (b?.0)
1118. b (51.0)
10. b (105.0)
10312
bl.b (217b.3)
21. 7/ 2/ 30
11. O/ ?/ H
75.0/12/ 171
.5/1?/ 1
73. O/ 3/ 1.33
S.7X 3/ .Ob
11. 2X 2/ 11
.b/ 2/ 1
l.lb
17
U2
1.27
10.7
.bl
11. bb
1138.0
1.27
.11 ( .17)
2.03 ( 3.27)
250.7 ( 103.3)
.22 ( .3b)
10.85 ( 21.bft)
S.71 ( 3.57)
.15 ( .23)
2.18 ( 3.51)
?b7.(11 (121.75)
11.57 ( 20.31)
-------
VEHICLE NO. nn
VEHICLE MODEL 7« SAAB
ENGINE 2.0 L(»?l C1D)
TRANSMISSION Al
CVN 0 KCf -0 LB3)
BAROMETER 7»n.lh MM HGf?1.1» IN MG)
0«T BULB TEMP. ??.j 0EG C(72.0 OfS M
BAG RESULTS
BAC NljMREP-
DESCRIPTION
BLOwfR OIF P MM. ^?0(IN, H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM, M?OCIN, H2ro
BLOWER INLCT M»P. ore. C(0tc. M
RLOHER RESOLUTIONS
CV3 HO* JTO'. CU. M£TRE9(SCM
TABLE E-9. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO, I HUN »
DATE U/13/78
M
1
O
HC
HC
CO
CO
Co?
coe
NOX
NOX
SAMPLE MFrER/RANGF/PPM
BCKGHO MFTFR/RANGE/PPM
SAMPLE Mp TER/BANGE/PPM
BC^CRf) MpTER/RANGE /PPM
SAMPLE MFTEP/RANGE/PCT
8C«GRn MFTER/RANGE/PCT
SAMPLE MpTER/RANGE/PPM
BC*GRO "FTf B/PAWOE /PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC
CO
coz
NOX
HC
CO
CO?
NOX
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRATION PPM
CONCENTRATION PCT
CONCENTRATION PPM
MASS GRAMS
MASS GRAM)
MASS C.RAMS
MASS GRAMS
Ct) CRAMS/KM (GPAMS/MH.C )
CO? GR
N0» GR
FUEL CONSUMPTION «v cs
CALCULATfp DISTANCE KM
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GBAMJ/KM (GHAM3/MJI.E)
co GRAMJ/KM (GRAMS/MH.EJ
CO? GSAMj/KM (GRAMS/«H.C)
NOX GRAMS/KM fG"AMS/MILE)
'VEL CONSUMPTION HY C8 L/inn«M
OVNO NO, i
CVS NO. »
HAC CART NO,
PROJECT NO,
TEST WEIGHT I3b1 KG( 1000 URS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD •,« KM( n.j HP)
GASOLINE EM.JT»-F
ODOMETER »h»
HUMIDITY si PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMtOITV «,1 GM/KG( lii.l CRAINS/LB)
COLO TRANSIENT
1571.S (fc?.fl)
?,)•» (
k».*l (<
.1* (
11. »• (
?.«>
"U
•7.7/11/ *tk
,7/ll/ 2
•S.3/ 3/ 1,18
3.0/ I/ .OS
17.O/ I/
I.OX If
8.1
17
1
STABILIZED
18
13
k3
t
.11
.Ok
1
1
<»^,^
1T80S
18,S/
13.S/
1.'
II.I/ 3/
3,I/ I/
t.%/ t/
HOT TRANSIENT
«2.2 (108,0)
1QJH5
bO.7
21,I/ if
12,2/ if
71,K
1.!
10. J
1.1
3/
2/
1.7k
30
12
171
1
1.3S
,05
10
1
81
10* 1
1.5* .
lk.1 I
2.80
28. SS 7
171J.7 191«
1.78
,»1 .78) ,0k
1.17 8.00) 1.17
{18.* *80,1) 256,3
.11 .50) ,0b
13.13 17.11) 11.11
1,7* 3.S7) b,17
b
• 0
)3
•
Ib
>2S
, 3
,15
.01)
1.81)
MS, 7)
.01)
21.17)
3.8»)
J1
Ikl
1.31
".0
.kb
11,52
1*S2, 7
l.no
,11 ( ,1D
2,00 ( 3,22)
252,1 ( «OS.b)
.17 < .28)
10.11 ( 21,5k)
1,7k ( 3,58)
C,F,
.?!>
-------
VEHICLE NO. HO
VEHICLE MODEL 7B SAAB
ENGINF l.n Hill CID)
TRANSMISSION 43
GVX fl KC,( .0 LBS)
HAROMFTER 7»n.'»l MM MG(?1.15 IN HC)
DRY HIILS TEMP. JS.O DEC C(77.0 OEG F)
BAG HFSUI.TS
RAT, NUMRFR
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
HLOHER PILFT P MM. H?OUN. H?O)
RLOHtH INLET TEMP. DEC. CCOEC. F)
BLI1KER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. METRES(SCF)
TABLE E-IO.VEHICLF EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. 1 RUN
DATE H/H/78
TIME
OYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
BAG CAKJ NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 5b PCT
ABSOLUTt HUMIDITY II.» GM/KC.( 79.7
HC SAMPLE
HC BCXGRD
CO SAMPLE
CO BT.KGPD
co? SAMPLE
co? BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX
KETER/RANGE/PPM
MF.TFH/RANGE/PPM
METFR/HANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CO^CENIRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOK CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MA33 CRAM3
CO MA33 GRAMS
CO? MA33 GRAMS
NO* MASS GRAM3
4MS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
Co GHAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GSAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM CCRAM3/MILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IOOKM(MPC)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAM3/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM (MPG)
1
COLO TRANSIENT
It73.8 (5R.fl)
t3.3 (110.0)
1035?
bO.b (?ltl.8)
10.8/ 3/ 108
1.7/ 3/ 17
.b/ll/
BS.b/ 3/
8.8/ 3/
Ib.S/ 2/
l.O/ 2/
Ib
1
8.17
13
t8t
1.S5
15.b
17H.1
1.05
.57 ( .11)
5.83 ( B.tJ)
300.1 ( »82.
1. Ib
?.1t ( 3.1?)
Z51.1 ( HOt.3)
.80 ( .3?.)
10.91 ( 81.57)
5.78 ( 3.SI)
-------
TAPLE E-lI.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
VF.HlCt F Nil. H"
VFHir.tF. mmFj_ -n SAHH
ENGIUF M.'l L( -II ClU)
TMANS"!SMld" A1
GVH 'I r,r,( -!! L«S)
M* !t» 7»?.7I) MM
mn.a itMp. es.i ot-c
BAG
M
MAC, NIIMIiFK
IN HG)
.n net F
MLn^fP n!F P MM_ H,H)(IN. H^O)
f>Liiwfn IHLfT P 1M. MPIKIN. H.T))
Ml o^,'< IfUET IfMP. OFG. (".(DEC.. F)
Ml.lHfR W| Vl'Ll' I IONS
Cvs FLCX STO. cu.
NF
HC
en SIMPLE HEi
c>> MCMIPO MI-
CH? SAMPLE MF 1FW/H»N[,FP/PCT
riv Hrf(riCu M[ if (j/KANr.F./PCT
nnx SAMPI.K MF if R/RANT.F./PPM
MO* HrnOf'0 MF IF rt/K AMllF/PPM
"C COt'CFNT^A I J()N PPM
CH COMCf NTRAFION PPM
ro,-> ini.,cr».TP4i ION PCT
N0» Cii'TTMRA 1 ION PPK
M«S
MASS (;W4MS
G'V'iMi
MC
en
MC
(.11
NO* (JkAMf./l-
MKL rnijSUMPT IriN HY (H L/ llMiKM(MPB)
f.«t CUI Aim -Ultll ANt.t KM
HC
CO
(r,WAMS/MlLE )
l U FTP I*F
(J-JAM.S/KM (r.WAMS/MIl F)
PHOJtCT MO.
NOX
HIFL
i;wAMS/KM
r.HAMT./'KM
(GRAMS/MIL^)
(GRAMS/MI |. E )
Hr en L/»II«KM
TE3T NO. 1 RUN
DATF. 11/J1/7B
TIME
DYN.O NO. S
CV3 NO. 7
BAG CAWT NO. I
HELAT1VE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDItr
I
COLP TRANSIENT
IbSl.O (bS.O)
1 »18.b (51.0)
•»•».< (11?. n)
103b«)
btl.5 (il3b.H)
m.n/ 3/ inu
l.R/ 3/ IS
il.i/ll/ tb?
.1/1 1/ i
87 , I/ 3/ 1 .bl
*.«/ D/ .05
au.t/ ?/ 20
1.7/ */ I
7.1H
BS
H31
1.51
1H.1
?.1>»
30.11
17*2.1
1 .17
.51 ( .18)
S.3b ( B.h?)
305.5 ( IH.b)
.3* ( .55)
IS.H7 ( 17. t?)
5.77 ( 3.51)
?I»1 ( 3. SB)
7t.h» (111. 81)
. 1 7 ( .87)
11.11 ( ll.Jh)
»U PCT
7.3 GH/KG( 51. J
2
STABILIZED
1 bSl .0 (bS.O)
l»1B.b (51.0)
»».» (IU.O)
17BOO
103. fl I3bb>.»>
lb.7/ I/ 17
U.5/ Z/ 1]
i
-------
VEHICLE NO. 331)
VFHICLE MODEL 7fl SAAB
ENGINE 2.0 L(i2i cio)
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW 0 KC( -0 LBS)
BAROMFTER 7*0.-u MM HG(2i.is IN HG)
DRY 8ULB TEHP. g?.fl OEG 0(73.0 0£G F)
BAG HFSULTS
BAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLOWER OIF P MM. HJOUN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
BLOWER INLET TFMP. DEC. CCDEG. F>
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. METRFS(SCr)
HC SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE METF.R/RANGE/PPM
co BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PCT
co? BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METCR/RANGE/PPM
NOX BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GHAM3
CO MASS GRAMS
CO?. MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAM3/KM (GRAM3/MILF)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/inOKM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
TABLE E-I2.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FJPC
TEST NO. 1 RUN
DATE 11/15/78
TIME
DYNO NO. S
CVS NO. 7
BAG CAHT NO. i
RELATIVE HUMIDITY hi PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY ltl.1 G«/KG( 7h.1
PROJECT NO. i|.
«.<• Kft( 11.3 HP)
NOX HKMlOITt C.f. l.nnbt.
HOT THANSIENT
lb?5.b (bt.nl
1»73.? (5R.O)
•»}.<» (111.0)
lUJb"!
10.
I.
13.
.
87.
3.
Ib.
1.
I/
S/
I/I
5/1
I/
O/
b/
"
R
1
1.
IS
3
31
I/
3/
I/
I/
I/ 1
3/
g/
*'
,ni
11
511
5«
.1
.17
.7?
1M1
15
175
17.
12.
?h.
S/
7/
1/1
i/
i/
3/
2 .5/I3/
.b?
.ns
17
2
52.
2.
H.
1.
17*1.7
.
S.
301
.
13.
5.
1
S5
52
.2
31
13
75
. 7t,
(
( R
( ifl
(
( 17
( 1
.RS)
,R7)
1.5)
.is)
.5?)
.57)
.
4 .
171
.
11.
k.
R/
R/
t/
2/
It
.
1
B
}/
)/
11
i/
.10
b
7J
RP
.3
.31
. 71
1R
13
7S
n
. *2
.01
1
1
2R.
in.
S/
b/
2/
2/
H5.7/1?/
.
71.
3.
12.
1.
j/i
n/
«/
o/
i/
q
2
1.
11
IS
2/
3/ 1
3/
2/
2/
.77
11
2b
30
.n
.bb
.11
PR
11
23?
1
.35
.ns
12
1
IhRII.A lit;. 3
Oh
1?
.n
11
7b
Ib
.hb
{
( ?
( 13
(
( 20
( 1
.OH)
.2R)
1.^)
.17)
.ni)
.R3)
.
?!
251
.
in.
*,,
1
If
7 7
.n
tt
11
75
.21
1
.11)
.' «)
103. H)
21
3
.3fc)
.Sb)
.5?)
.IB (
II. B7 (
-------
VEHICLE NO. 330
VEHICLE MOOKL ?n SAAB
ENGIHF ?." i.dei ciu)
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW tt K0( -II t»3)
BAROMFTEH 7»i.j.8 MM Hc.(?q.?n IN HR>
DRY Hl'LH TFMP. S1.7 Ot"G C ( 7 1 . II DEC F)
BAG RFSULTS
RAT, NIIHHFR
PFSCRIPTTON
f»LO*EH OIF P MH. H?0(lN. w?0)
PI.HNFR INLET P MM. H?i|(IN. h?o)
BLHuFH INLET TFMP, OHi. C(I)l-.G. F)
8Lnw£R Rf VOLUT ION3
cvs FLOW sro. cu. MErtu
HC SAMPLE METE R/R»NGF./PPM
HC ecKGHD MF.TFM/RANC,F/PPM
CO SAMPLE METFR/RANHF./PPM
CO t»C*G'-:D METFR/RANRE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE METFR/RAN'iF/pCT
COP HCKGOD METFR/RANi-E/PCT
NO* SAMPLE MFTFR/RANf.F/PPM
NOX HCKC.KD METKR/RANRE/PPM
Oil UIION FACTOR
HC ConCtNTRAT IQN PPM
CO CONCfNIRAt IHN PPM
en? coNcrMRATjoN PCT
NOK CONCf.NTRATIOM PPM
HC MASS T.IMMS
CO MASS GWAM3
COP MAS.". GI'AMS
Nliy MASS OWAMS
HC GRAMS/KM f GRA>'"/M1I.F)
CO C.HAMS/KM (GRAMS/wILF)
CO? GRANS/KM (T.RAMS/MIl F)
NOt GHAM3/KH (GRAM3/MUF)
FUFL C'lNSllMPTION tit C« L / ICMIKM(MPC)
CALCULATFD OISTAf'CF KM
TABLE E-I3.VEMICLF F.MUSION "tSULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. ? RUN
DATE ll/lb/7B
TIME
OTNO NO. S
CVS NO. 7
SAG CART NCI. i
RELATIVE MUMIOITT 18 PCT
ABSOLUTE MIIMIOITY b.e GH/K6(
W
COMPOSITE FTP
HC GHAMS/KM ( GHA MS/M I L F )
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILF)
CO? GHAMS/KM (GKAMS/M1LF)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MIlf)
FUfL CONSUMPTION HV ft* L/1IH>KM (MPT.)
PSOJfCT NU. I 1
TEST HEIGHT )3b* KG( 3UtHl
ACTUAL ROAC LOAD H.t Kr.( 1J.3 HP)
GASOLINE tM-m-F
NUX HUMIDITY t.F, .B7tM
GRAINA/LH)
t
COLO TRANSIENT
IHM.J (S7.B)
•»•».» (Hi. II)
bP.7
IS.?/ 3/
I.S/ 3/
R7.ll/l I/
.b/lI/
B7.J/ 3/
3.8/ 3/
18.It ?/
1.3/ 8/
i.he
.nb
R.ni
inn
1.S7
17.fa
I.Rh
17HI,
i.;
,*<> C
,<*H (
7!^)
.17
.31 ( .Sll)
13.te ( 17.«13)
S.73 ( 3.%h)
( J.'tt.)
(1H3.S3)
( .?7)
( IS. b7)
STABILIZED
IbPS.b (hl.O)
llbd.l (S7.8)
»•«.•• (118.0)
17790
ini.l (3b78.b)
17.S/ g/ 18
IS.I/ e/ 15
7b.b/13/ 7k
.b/13/ 1
S3.0/ 3X .93
3.1*/ 3/ .OS
3.-«/ e/ 3
,7/ ?/ 1
11. 31
3
73
.BR
8.7
.21
R.*?
.11
.03 ( .05)
1.13 ( 9.31)
*71.7 { 137.?)
.08 ( .If)
n.7o ( an.in
b.lb ( 1.B3)
HOT
lb?S.b (ht.O)
IIKR.l (S'.d)
• » . » ( 1 1 f . (I )
1U3SO
».n.b
es.b/ e/
in.i/ «/
'7.1/ 3/
3.9/ J/
11.1/ */
.b/ £/
9.35
tb
l.3b
13.b
11.59
ISUb.l
1.37
10
1
.nb
1
.10
?.51
?M.8
.Ib)
l.nB)
11.3b ( J0.71)
5.75 ( 3.58)
-------
TABLEE-14. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
VEHICLE NO. nn
VEHICLE MODEL
ENGINE ?.0 Lfiei CIO)
TRANSMISSION AI
GVW 0 KG( -0 L"S>
BAROMf.UR 7«t.b» MM HR(?«.*a IN H6)
DRY 8UL8 tf.»*. ft.! OCii C(7?.n DFG M
BAG RESULT*
BAG ;«J"MFP
CESCRIP1 in1*
r>JF P MM, M?T(IN, n?0)
I*IF.T P "M. H?odN, nan)
JNLFT T«MP. HFC. CdUG. M
BLOrtfR OfVOLHUONS
CVS FLO« STO. CU. "ET"f3CSCF)
M
HC
HC
co
co
CO? S4MPIF
en? BC-iown
NOX S«MPLF
NO" HCKC"n
MFTF H/OANC.t /PPM
Mt Tf R/R»NCf /PP1'
DILUTION F«CTOO
HC CONf (VtRlTIPN PPM
co coNcf >«"'»TION PPM
en? cofTSTAMCE K
FTP
HC G»»U3/KU (r.HA"S/MKC )
CO G>)A"S/XM (GSAM3/MJLI)
CO? CR«MS/"*PG)
TEST NO. 1 RUN
DATE 11/27/71
TIME
DYNO NO, 5
CVS NO, 7
RAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
1
COLD TRANSIENT
Ibnil, i ( b 3,0)
1117. B (57,0)
03.3 cun.n)
103b?
hi.) (215*. S)
75. 0/ ?/ 75
12. S/ ?/ 13
23. B/ 3/ 550
.I/ M I
M.I/ */ l.Sh
J.0> I/ .05
11. 2/ ft 11
1.3/ 2/ I
R,?b
hH
£j>b
1.52
13.1
37. »S
170?. 0
1.30
,30 ( .b3)
k.si ( jn.iB)
205.0 ( I7h.2>
.23 ' .lb)
11. ie ( »7,«»3)
5,»5 ( 3.S7)
.If ( ,?0)
111) ( lib)
IP.'n ( ?l,5i)
32 PCT
S.» CM/KG( 37.8
?
STABILIZED
lbOO.2 (b3.0)
1W7.8 (57.0)
t3,3 (110. 0)
177^7
105.0 (3707.2)
13. S/ e/ 13
n. n/ 2/ n
M.1/13/ H 7
,l/13/ 0
»7.3/ 3/ .82
3. OX 3/ ,05
3, I/ 2/ 3
l.S/ 2/ «
lb.32
J
«b
.77
I.1*
s!si
lOX.t
.«»
.03 ( .05)
.RO ( 1.15)
210.1 ( 3Rb.3)
,0» ( ,0b'
10.31 ( 22.81;
b.lB ( 3.81)
TEST WEIGHT
ACTUAL ROAD i
GASOLINE EM- 3
ODOMETE"
GRAIN3/LB) NO
3
HOT TRANSIENT
IbOO,} (b3.0)
11«7.B (57,0)
13.3 (110. 0)
103S5
bl.3 (21b3.R)
25. «/ 2/ 25
10, S/ 2/ 10
77,3/ie/ 177
.i/ie/ o
70. b/ 3/ 1.28
3.S/ >/ ,05
e.n/ 2/ 8
1.5/ ?/ 2
10.31
lb
171
1,23
b.b
12I20
1377.7
.bb
.10 .15)
2.11 3.10)
238.1 383. k)
,11 .18)
10.33 22.77)
5. 71 3.54)
PROJECT NO, H-»»t3-001
13k« KG( 3000 LBS)
AD ».» KM( 11,3 HP)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F, ,»S10
-------
M
VF.M1CI F NN. Hll
VEHKi E Monr |. ;a SAAH
ENGlNf ?.n l.(l?l CIO)
TRAN.SMISSIOU A1
CVH n KM -n
bARMMrlF.H 717.?.?
HC.(i>i.i.i IN HI;)
Of.ti r(>».n neu F)
HAG £' SI'l. I <:
n«r. NUMKI.H
OF SLW I
GASOLINE EM-371-F
ODOMETER ^b)
RELATIVE HUHIOITV 13 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY S.O CH/KGC »?.! CRAlNS/LB)
NOX MUf
COLO TRANSIENT
lh£5.b (bl.U)
1173.2 (58.0)
13.3 (110.0)
10371
hi. 5 (ei73.b)
73. 7/ it 71
I?.3X It 1?
21. IX 3X Sb5
.3X 3X 7
85.7X 3X 1.51
1.V 3X .07
IS. 5X 2X 18
?.OX it I
1.12
bl
^ jb
1.S3
It.. 7
2.?3
1*1.38
1??1.R
1.71
.31 .fc2)
b.b7 in. 73)
211,8 182.1)
.in .is)
U.in 17. hi)
<>.7S ( 3,5*)
.13 ( .?!)
ill ( .21)
11.11 ( ? (bl.O)
1173.2 (58. 0)
13.3 (110.0)
103b1
bl.f (ilbl.1)
30. IX 2X 30
1.SX 2X 10
M.3X12X 117
1.1X12X 2
72. 7X 3X 1.32
3.7X IX .Ob
B.3X 2X 8
l.bX 2X 2
1.11
22
181
1.27
b.1
.7b
11.11
112b.1
.70
.13 ( .21)
2.31 ( 3.77)
217. 8 ( 318.7)
. 12 ( .20)
in. 75 ( 21.88}
S.7b ( J.SBI
C.F. .8bb?
-------
TABLE E-I6.VEMICU EMISSION RESULTS
FT PC-
PROJECT NO.
VEHICLE NO. 330
VEHICLE MODEL '8 SAAB
ENGINE 2.U L<121 CIO)
TRANSMISSION A3
GVH || KCC -0 LB3)
BAROMETER 711.17 MM HG(2*.3t IN HGJ
DRY BULB T£MP. Jl.l DEC C(70.0 DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAT. NUMRER
DESCRIPTION
DIF P MM
H?0(IN. H?0)
INLET P MM. H?OCIN. M?O)
BLOHEH INLET TEMP. DEC. C(OEG. F)
8LO«£R REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW SID. CU. METRES(SCF)
HC SAMPLE MEfFR/RANCE/PPM
HC BCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
co SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PPM
CO HCKGRD METER/RANGE/PPM
CO? SAMPLE ME1EH/RANGE/PCT
w co? BCKGRO METER/RANGE/PCT
H- NOX SAMPLE ME*£R/RANr,E/PPM
-J NOX BCKGRO ME1ER/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAM3
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
Co GRA^S/KM (GpAns/MlLE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX CRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/100KM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSIJE FTP PESULT3
HC 'GRAMS/KM tGRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MUE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAM5/MJI.F)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CO L/innKM (MPG)
.»* (
2.11 (
TEST NO. 3
DATE 12/ 1/78
TIME
OYNO NO. S
CVS NO. 7
BAG CANT NO. 1
RUN
TEST
*CTU«t ROAD LOAD
GASOLINE EM-371-F
ODOMETER 10SS
KG( 3000 LBS)
B.» «*»( 11.3 HP)
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 37 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY S.B GM/KGC 10.t CRAlNS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C_F. .BUS
1
COLO TRANSIENT
lb?5.b (bl.O)
IH17.8 (57.0)
11.3 (ttn.O)
1039!
bl.1 (2170.Z)
.11}
1.11)
(bl.O)
l»17.l (57.0)
13.3 (110.0)
17713
105.3 (3711.b)
HOT TRANSIENT
lb?S.b (bl.O)
1117.8 (S7.0)
13.1 (110.0)
103bl
bl.i (ZlbS.O)
73.
12.
23.
.
81.
3.
18.
•
n/
B/
I/
2/
O/
2/
B/
"
R
if
t/
3/
3/
3/ 1
3/
2/
g/
.31
b2
73
13
511
5
.55
.05
11
0
13.
11.
52.
1.
so.
3.
3.
•
B/
q/
7/1
1/1
7/
3/
I/
2/
It
511
1.
1C
f
3b
SI
.1
.n
.80
lb'B.8
f
b.
2^1
.
13.
5.
1
3fl
38
.S
32
OS
77
.87
(
( 10
.kl)
«2b)
( 173. B)
(
( 18
( 3
.52)
.03)
.51)
t
t
«SB
.
11.
b.
%
*
5
2/
2/
3/
3/
3/ .
3/ .
;/
2/
.11
3
18
83
• *
.lb
!a;
11
If
50
t
88
05
3
0
2b.
in.
81.
3.
70.
3.
8.
•
3/
3/
9/1
h/1
I/
3/
I/
2/
to
2/
2/
2/
2/
3/ 1
3/
i/
*/
.11
17
2b
to
110
b
.27
.05
8
0
178
Ib07.0
03
15
,1
08
12
21
.41
( *
( l.
( Hb
( •
( 21.
( 3.
01)
52)
.5)
13)
lb)
IK)
.
2.
237
,
10.
5.
1.
7
12
22
• ^
.bO
.bl
1370.1
10
20
.3
11
21
77
.80
(
( 3
.17}
• S3)
( 381.8)
(
( 22
( 3
.22)
.8b)
.51)
.IS { .81)
II. ?1 ( 70.61)
-------
T»BLEE-!7.VEHlCLr EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
VEHICLE NO. Tin
VEMKLt MODfL 7»
fNCINF ?,0 LCU) CIO)
TR»N5"IS3I(1N «}
CV« 0 KC.f .0
B*ROMETE9 71«!.i? MM HC(?9.nb IN Mr,)
??.? nrc c(7?.n opr,
CD
B»C NU"RFB
DESCRIPTION
BLO*fR DTF P MM. H?n(IN. H?0)
P MM. M?O(JN
TE"P. OEG. C(OFG. F)
CVS FLO" STO. CU. MfTRE3(9CF)
HC BCKGRO MFTEP/B»Nr,E/PPM
CO S*"PUE "FTER/RANf.E/PPM
CO BCKGRO MrTFR/R»NT,t /PPI"
co? 3*MPLF MFTF.R/R»NGE/PCT
CO? PCKGRD MFTFR'R*NGf /PCT
NOX S»"PLF
NOX
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCFNTR«TJON PP"
CO CONCFNT"»riO'l PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC »»SS GRAuil
co MASS C.RAM*
CO? MA33 C.RAMJ
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC r,HAw<)/KM (r,»Aws
CO GRAMS/KM (r.RA«S/"ILE )
CO? GSAM3/KM (GRAM5/MH.£)
NOX GRAMS/KM {GRAMg/MJLf )
FUFL CONSUMPTION Ry c» L/10nKM(MPG)
C»LCULATFt1 OtSTANCF »M ("ILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RFSULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAM3/Ml|.f)
CO CRAMJ/KM
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMJ/KM ( GR AMJ /M [ L f )
FUEL CONSUMPTION nv CB
PROJECT NO. ll"»'»9j.oni
H.3 HP)
TtST NO, 9 RUN
DATE I?/ S/7B
DVNO NO. S
CVS NO, 7
RAG CART NO, l
RELATIVE MU«IDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
1
COLO TRANSIENT
IbPS.b (kt.O)
1973.? (SR.O)
»3.3 (lin.O)
1037b
fco.s (?i3a.i)
79, 7/ ?/ Rl)
9,5/ f/ 10
?3.R/ 3/ S50
,!/ 3/ t
81. 3/ 3/ 1.S8
3. I/ I/ ,0$
11. »/ ?/ IS
,S/ ?/ 1
8.17
71
5?R
1.59
1.99
17.11
1»0?.9
1.39
b|99 lo!9»)
197,0 977,1)
n!l7 17|sb)
9,71 l.Sb)
.19 ( .*3)
?.»1 ( 3.88)
111 ( |lR)
11.1M ( (1.18)
il PCT
3.1 GM/KC( ?b,3
?
STABIL1UO
lb?5.b (k9,0)
197},? (SI.O)
91,1 (110.0)
17819
109.0 Cih71,7)
11. t/ ?/ 11
10. I/ I/ 10
51,?/l3/ 99
1.1/13/ 1
99, 8/ I/ ,lb
l.B/ I/ ,0b
Is/ */ i
15,91
*
,R1
?.l
«|kl
1539,7
.35
.03 .Ot.)
.'1 1.9'.)
(9*, S 199,9)
.Oh ,09)
10, b7 a?. no
b.19 1.10
TEST WEIGHT 13b» KC( 3000
ACTUAL 'OAD LOAD 1.9 KH( 1
GASOLINE EM. 371. F
ODOMETER 1079
CRAINS/LB) NOX HUMIDITY C,F,
3
HOT TRANSIENT
lb?5.b (b9,0)
1973.? (58. 0)
93.3 (110,0)
103S7
bO,» (?131,9)
?9.0/ ?/ ?9
8,9/ ?/ 9
80.3/1?/ 18b
,S/1?/ 1
71, S/ 3/ l.?9
l.b/ I/ ,0k
7,?/ I/ 7
,9/ ?/ 0
10.19
?1
i79
b.R
.'3
1S.59
1377,5
.1.9
,13 ( ,?0)
?.1R ( 3,5?)
?19.0 ( Iflt.b)
.11 ( ,1R)
10.97 ( ?2,b9)
S,7b ( 3,51)
,I11R
-------
TABLEE-18.
"E3ULTS
VFHTCl F NO. 3in
VFMICt.E MOl)fL 7H SAAB
ENGINF. ?.n L( m cm)
TRANSMISSION A3
GVW II KG( -n LH3)
DRY
7»?.<)S MM Hr,(?9.?<; tN HG1
TEMP. ?3.3 OFG C(7H.n OEG F)
BAG RFSULTS
RAT, NUMflTR
orF P MM. H?n(rw. H?,))
IULfT P MM. H?fl(IN. H?0)
INLET IFMP. DKG. C(nEG.
Rl
cv.«s FLOW STO. cu.
we SAMPLE
HC RCKGRO MFIFR/RANRF/PPM
rn SAMPLE METFR/RANRE/PP^
en RCKGRO METF[J/R»NGE/PPM
CO? S4MPLE MFTFR/RANr,F./Pr.T
CO? RCKGRO MF1FR/RANGF/PCT
nnx SAMPLE MFTER/RANGE/PPM
OIl.UTMlN FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
ro? coNCTNTRi t ION PCT
NOX LdNCENTRATlON PPM
MC MASS T.RAMS
CO M»33 GRAMS
CO? MASS r,W»M3
K'OX MASS GRAMS
HC GPAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
Co GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAM3/KM (GRAM">/MILE)
NOX GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MILF)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY r.R L/lnnKM(MPG)
DISTANCE KM (MTIF.S)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
MC GRAMS/KM (CRAMS/MILE)
CO GWAMVKM (GRAMS/-MH C>
TO? GRAM3/KM (T.RAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAM3/KM (GRAMS/MIlf)
FUFL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/lnOKM (MPR)
TF3T NO. 1
DATE li/?<»/7R
TIME
OYNO NO. 5
CVS MU. 7
RAG CAPT NO.
PUN
F HUMIOITY ?7 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY *. <\ GM/KRC 3».3
I
COLO TRANSIENT
(fct.n)
(<;R.O)
I .Rb
!b35.H
I .HR
.3* f .SS)
H.H? ( 7.11)
1?.H7 ( 1R.R7)
5.7b ( 3.5R)
I.R3 ( ?.«
STARILTZFO
lb?S.h (M.n)
»3.3 (lin.n)
17ROS
in*. 7
uu. 1 1 -•••>'n-(iMi
TfST WFIGHT l^b* xr.(
ACTIIAl ROAD LOAD «.i
GASOLINE EM-378-F
onoilFTFR ^pq
NOX HIjHTOITt f-f -
HOT TH»NSIFNT
H 3 . 3 ( U f I . n )
)03h3 '
bl.ll (?15?.B)
b5.7/ ?/
II. V ?/
Rl .H/l I/
1 .H/l I/
R 1 . h / 3 /
e.n/ 3/
Ib.R./ Z/
1. ft/ !/
R.h >
Sb
35R
1 ,H7
IS.?
bb
] 1
37b
H
1 .511
. 0*
17
e
13. 3/ e/
1,1, g/ j/
HS.3/13/
J.0/13/
'tR.R/ 3/
3.»/ 3/
3.H/ ?/
!.»/ ?/
15. 3R
H
"Ml
.R?
?. 1
13
in
H3
?
,R7
.ns
3
i
2* . I/ ?. /
R.3/ i/
hv.i/i?/ :
.H/l?/
7n.B/ 3/ I,
?.5/ 3/ ,
in.i/ ?/
i.i/ ?/
.Ml. 3?
17
ISO
i.ei
R.3
?*
8
I5K
1
.?R
• 0*
10
1
1
IS*
.01
.7R
Z53.3
.Ob
in. 8?
b.lR
.?3
I.RR
-h.?
.35
( .Ob)
( l.?71
( H07.b)
( .OR)
C Jl.b»)
( 3.PH)
,sn
lU.hb
1 'IRII.R
.Rl
.1(1 ( .lb)
l.SS ( ?.RR)
2H1.H ( 3BH.'»)
.lb ( ,?5>
In.HH ( ??.53)
S.7h ( 3.SH)
( ?!.??)
-------
VEHICLE NO. 330
VEHICLE MOntL 7R SAAP
ENGIUF ?.n i (i?i r.in)
TRANSMISSION A3
CVW I! Kf,( -n LHS)
BAROKFTKH 7ti.t3 MM HG(?q.iq IN HG)
DRY BULB TF'IP. ??.« nCC CC73.n PEG F)
BAG HFSULTS
RAT. NUMRFR
DESCRIPTION
OIF p MM, H?O([N. H?O)
I»'LFT P MM. H?O(TN. H?O)
If/LFT TFMP. OFG. C(nFC.. F)
INVOLUTIONS
rvs FLOW STO. ru.
HC
HC
CO
CO
CO?
Co?
I
to
o
SAMplI
BCKGRD MFTFR/RANGF/PPM
SAMPLE
RCKGRD
SAMPLE MF. TFR/RANGE/PCT
MFTFO/RANriFVPCT
NOX Rf.KGRO MF
DIl
HC cmirrNTRATinN PPM
CO CONCFNTRA flON FPM
CO? CONCf.'NTHAT ION PCI
NO/ CONtf UTRATION PPM
HC
ro
TO? MASS RHAMS
NOX MASS GDAHS
.VFHICLF. EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. ? RUN
DATE ll/3n/7B
OYNO NO. S
CVS WO. 7
6AR TART NO. 1
RELATIVE HIPMIPITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
PCT
.? r,M/KC,<
I
COLO TRANSIENT
)h?5.S (ht.d)
IHH7.8 (S7,n)
»3.3 (llll.n)
bl.n {PISS.7)
b?.7/ f/ h3
q.q/ ?/ in
fl».M/ii/ aqq
B".H/ 3/ l.Sh
3.\/ J/ .ns
I?.*/ i/ 17
i.S?
It,.I.
STABILIZED
lb?5.b (l-H.n)
«f»7,8 (57.0)
S3. 3 (llll.n)
17R3?
ln9.ll
13.n/ ?/
q.b/ ?/
q.s/n/
se.ix s/
13
in
5!
q
.qi
.P7
3
1
.PS
5.n)
NO. 11-iim-imi
WEIGHT 13bH KR{ ^Ollll LPS)
»CTU*L WOAO LOAD «.» K.<( I ] . 3 H
G»<»OLtNF FM-'j7?.F
onnnETFR ini'q
HIIHUUTT C.F. .Bt<.^
HOT TRANSIENT
» 3 . i ( 1 1 o . n )
1U37I
n.i,/ e/ q
173
8
73.t./ t/ 1.3t
»,K/ 3/ .n?
fl.S/ ?/ <1
i.n/ ?/ i
11.S3
HC (!(>»M,1/KH
CO GRAHS/KM tr.RAMS/MIl.F)
CO? CKAH.T/KM (C.RAMS/HILf )
MOX RRAMTi/KM Cr.RAMS/MIUF)
FIIFl CONSUMPTION BY CR t /Mnl)KM(Mp-,>
CAI CIILATfn Olf.TANCF KH f M 1 1 F S )
COMPOSITE FTP RFSU1.IS
HC GRAMS/KM (GHAMS/MILF)
ro r.DAM.s/KM cr.HAMn/Mn r )
ro? GMAM:I/KM (r.K»Mn/Mti F>
NOX r.HAM.I/KM (r.RAMS/MRF)
FUFL CONSUMPTION RY CR l/IPPKM (MPC,)
,33 ( .S3)
».bS ( 7.HB)
It.q ( »7t.S)
J.q1* ( IB'IO)
5.7b ( 3.SB)
.1? ( .11)
l.'U ( S.OM)
.0*
.Db ( .nq)
J1. IS f ?l.nq>
b.eb ( 3.Rq)
.13 ( .'
11.31) C ?n.hK)
-------
VEHICLE NO. 330
VEHICLE MflOCL 78 SAAB
ENGINE a.|| L(l?l Cii>)
TRANSMISSION A3
GVN n KG( -0 LB3)
BAROMF.rER 731. I* MM HG{?9.10 IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. aa.R OEG CC73.0 DEG F)
BAG RESULTS
RAG NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
SLOWER OIF P M
BLOWER INLET P
TABLE E-20.VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. 3 RUN
DATE \it 1/79
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
CV3 NO. 7
BAG CAHT NO. 1
. H?0(IN. H?0)
MM. H50(IN. HJO)
BLOwER INLET TEMP. OEG. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
cvs FLOW STO. cu. METRES(SCF)
PI
HC SAMPLE
cn SAMPLE
co BCKGKD
CO? SAMPLE
C0,i BCKGRD
NOX SAMPLE
NOX BCKGRO
MFTER/RANCE/PPM
METFR/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PCT
METER/RANGE/PPM
MET.-.R/RANGE/PPM
DILUTION FACTOP
HC COK":rNTHATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION <>CT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NO* "«»S C.WAM3
riC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY C8 L/100KM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
Cf> GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
TO? GRAM/3/M (GpAMS/MlLE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CB L/IODKM (MPG)
PROJECT NU.
TEST HEIGHT ISM KG( sono LBS)
ACTUAL ROAD LOAD fl.t Kn( 11.3 HP)
GASOLINE EM-37Z-F
ODOMETER 10J7
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 31 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 7.0 GM/KG( 'fB.S GRAINS/IB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
COLD
lb
0)
,0)
10357
bft
bl.
10.
8b.
1.
83.
5.
19.
•
•7
7/
If
(51»
if
i/
b/11/
b/11/
h/
H/
I/
9/
8
3/ 1
3/
i/
*'
.H5
53
f.B)
b5
10
•»17
5
.5*
,0t
19
1
STABILIZED
ibas.b
IS . 7.8
fj.3
vOt.
(57.
(110
0)
0)
.0)
HOT
lb5S
Hf 7
V3
17808
10f.»
15.1*/
9.9/
f*.*/!
(3b"3
a/
a/
3/
1.9/13/
f8.5/
3.9/
8. 3/
.?/
IS
395
1
•
18
1
57
51 '
.3
.85
.95
t
IbSl.b
•
H.
291
*
15.
5.
35
84
1
.89
(
( 7
.55)
.78)
.» ( HbB.B)
33
SB
77
(
( 18
( 3
.S3)
.37)
.59)
•
1
»
3/
3/
a/
a/
.99
3
39
78
.b
.19
.77
7.7)
15
10
ta
5
.83
.Ob
2
1
bO
aa.
8.
t>9.
1.
70.
3.
9.
•
TRANSIENT
.b
. 8
.3
Cbf.
(57.
(110
0)
0)
.0)
103b5
. 8
3,
b/
(aiH
a/
a/
3/15/
3/ia/
b/
5/
b/
B/
10
3/ 1
3/
a/
a/
.3b
15
b.a)
aa
9
157
a
.58
.05
10
1
1H9
HBH.b
.03
.7b
837.3
.05
10,18
b.5b
.59
(
( 1
.05)
.83)
•
1.
1.
B
10
as
.9
.51
.55
1 .1 b b . i»
09
85
( 381.9) a3b.-»
(
( 53
( 3
.08)
.10)
.89)
.
in.
5.
Ib
53
78
.93
(
( 5
.!•»)
.93)
( 3BO.H)
(
( as
( 3
. a'»)
.01)
.59)
.1) ( .17)
.R9 ( 3.05)
.aH (399.-»a)
.1H ( .55)
.7H ( 51.91)
-------
APPENDIX F
MARQUIS FTP RESULTS FOR REGULATED AND UNREGULATED
EMISSIONS WITH THREE TEST FUELS
F-l
-------
TABLE F-l. SUMMARY OF REGULATED, INDIVIDUAL HYDROCARBON AND ALDEHYDE EMISSIONS FROM 1970 ."ARQUIS
FTP I'.ml :i:tionn Patca,
IK: Evoj-orntivc Emission'., c^
Consumption
MM.
Jl.-l
30-2
36-3
36-4
36-5
37- i
37-2
3H- 1
JII-3
Fy| D.llr
EM-3h'i-F S-UB-79
EK-38')-F 5-0(>-79
FM-3f'J-F '.-lO-~"j
KM-3H-J-K r.-22-7>)
EM-3f)'J-F S-23-79
Avor -440
EM-3H',-F T.-14-79
p;M-3u'.-F :,-i'i-7'j
Av»-r,i.;»
KM- i>ir,-r .-in- n
KM-JHO-j' ',-17-7.)
Av-r.l'j..
MC
".14
O. I'j
0.22
0.11
0. U
o.T r>'
O.M')
0.12
O.Vl'
0. 10
0.12
o'.Ti
OJ
l.VG
2.39
2.70
l.SU
l.'SO
27 12
I. IB
1..I7
r.2n
1 -2f,
l.'.l
I".")1)
NO.
O.rj3
0.50
0.4(1
0.47
0.40
0.44
o . :,o
o.ja
?r. 4<7
0 . rj(l
o . r,o
"•'"'
Dill.
0 . 30
0.33
0.44
0.33
0 . 3 l_
o. 14"
0. 10
0. If,
0 .~3 3
0. HI
0 . 3 )
o.»;
iim. Tot..!
0.12 |.?2
l.lfl 1.51
1.20 1.70
0.90 l.ji
1_-J1 1 • 76
1.14 J.4H
0.93 1.2.1
I.J3 _l.4M
1.7)1 "l . V,
I).')') }.?•}
1 . 3'l 1 .J2
r.i'i I.M
'/ion km
10.32
16 . r'V>
10.27
16.20
16. 13
"lft.30
I', 4-)
|..'f,,,
I'l.'.'l
10. 32
10.71
10.;. 7
FTP Individual llvdiix-.irboit Emission* R,it.-s n.i/km
if. -I
11. -2
36-3
3'. -4
3f.-rJ
37-1
3V-2
3H-1
3H-2
16-1
30-2
J6-3
31. -4
JO-'j
37-1
37-2
in- 1
3it-2
EM-3IM-F 0-HH-7-J
KM-3l)-.«-r 'j-U'J-7'J
EM-311'l-r 0-10-71
EM-3I!')-K ',-,•'2-7')
KM-.1HM-F '.-21-7'J
AV.M-,,.,,)
KM-.Wi-F 0-14-7'>
EM-j.'i'i-F r.-r>-7';
Av.-r.vi.-
KM- li;0-F S-IO-7'I
EM-JflO-F S-17-7'1
Av.-r.i<|.'
KM- IM'I-F r)-oll-7'l
EM-J»'J-F 'j-0'.l-Ti
EM-3H')-F 'i-m-7.)
l:M-3HM-F '.-22-7')
KM-3H'i-K ',-,.3-7.,
Avrr /irj.
EM-3R',-F ')- 14-70
EM-.lfl'.-F r,-l')-7'l
AV.T,T|"
IIM- JlK.-F S-lli-'M
KM- HH.-F r.-l7-7'J
AVI* r.i'j.
H-ih.\ii.-
',4. HI
4li.')0
'.'..43
42.7'.
41. ;o
4H.72
3'). 71
4i. !•>
41". 4'.
in.:1;
45. Jf>
4I.VJ
Form-
O.HV
1.2-t
0 . Mi
O.'l'l
0
0.71
O
;!.o',
r.Vi i
1 ,(:.'
o. t;
l .mi
Ethylrm-
3. 'JO
4 . Of,
O.U7
2.'IH
2.'1H
3 . 0'j
2.11
2.01
2. 36
, t, fj
3.11
2.M3
A,vt.
„
0
0.12
0
0
O.II2
o
0
0
0
1)
1)
Ethnnn Ao-'t^l'-ti"-- Pf>i'.i(.'' I'r'.py ifiu-
4. 60
3.n',
3.H',
2. 30
2.0r>
3.31
3.r,4
3.73
V.M"
3 . 2'J
3.G7
J.4H
FTP
Ac'-toii"*
0
0.44
0
O
0
O.O'>
0
0
O
O
fl
lV"
2.47
1.71
3.R)
3.2'J
2_.07
3.19
1.1(1
2. 11
1 .OS
1.74
2 . Hf,
2". 30
1.12 l.f.ll
1.43 2.17
2.30 3.04
O.HI 1.37
1.37 I.JO
1 .41 1 . .4I 1'. .',4
2. HO l.'.lll
1.74 I'.-."
3.')4 14.4:'
l.HO H.'.H
.'.01 I'l.'.'l
.'.21 'i.'..|
.'.61 )().!'!
2.11. 11. "1
:'.4'l 11 . W
Ald^lli'dt...; Emissttm R.il.?'-., mgAm
M
Isnl.ulj-y-
0.37
O
0.12
0
0
•T.T»
O.I 1C,
o
0.01
0
I)
o
Ki-loni' crciioti-
0 0
0.37 n
0 n. 1')
0 n
O II
O.OV tt.nj
11 it
0 0
0 o
II o. 12
O _ (I.IIC,
i) II.DI
ii''x.i- ni'ii^i.tt"
II 0
0 O
0 O.')-'
0 0
n. o . so
l» O. 7"
O 0
0 0
O 1)
'I II. IK.
0 0__
II O.'M
•r. .1 ,1 1
I..M
2.0'.
1 .'('I
O.'l'.i
') . '.0
1 . i r
O. "0
., . ll'j
1 ."'II ,
1 .'111
II.. 4 4
-------
T)
Ul
Nl), 11
VFH]CLE MODEL 7S MF.O MAHUUlS
ENGINE S.7 1(351 CIO) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
GVM 0 KG( -n L"S)
BAROMFTEP 73H.ob MM HG(?8.'»n IN HG)
DRY BULB TEMP. ?3.3 DCG COt.n OEG F)
BAG PFSULTS
HAT. NllMfitR
TAHLF F-2. VfHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEAT NO. 1 RUN
DATE S/ 8/7*
TlMF
DYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
BAG TART NO. 1
OIF
BL1WER
M^ H?0(IN. w?(l)
MM. H?0(IM. M?0)
IM.H IRMP. UEG. rtnec.
Rr.VOLI/TTOfJS
CVS FLOH STD. CU. METRFS(SCF)
HC SAMpLF. t
«c HCKGfn MFTFR/RAN^F/PPH
TO SAMPI E MF TFR/RANT.F/PPM
en? SAMPLE
ro? BC^GRO
NPX 3»MPtF.
N(IX
UR/RANRF./PCT
(;t /PCT
KTf H/RANtF/PPM
DILUTION FAC1HH
Mf. CONCFMlWA! Ip>j PPM
rn cnNcf.NTRA t IUN FPM
co? CONG? stRAi ION PCT
NOX CO''CENfP«I Irj'f PPM
HC MISS HHtMS
rn MASS r.H»MS
CO? MAST. GM*»'3
NO* MASS
GRAMS/KM ir,'".KS/MHE)
HC
CO .
CO? GRAMS/KK (GRAMS/MILF)
NOX GRAMS/KM (O^AMS/MILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION HY rn L/IPOKMCMPO
TMCULATEC DIUTANCF KM (MILES)
FTP Hf SUL TM
HC GPAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM CCR4MS/MILR )
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAM.1/MII T)
NHX GHAMS/KM ( f.(J t hS/M H F )
FUFL CONSUMPTION HY C. H 1./1IIIIKH (MPC)
PROJECT NO.
TEST HEIGHT ?im KG( '•SOD LHS)
ACTUAL ROAD tOAD 8.1 KW( ie.0 HP)
GASOLINE tM-3H1-F
ODOMETER
,11 (
1.9t, (
37R.BI
RELATIVE HUMIDITY 70 PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 13.0 GM/KG( 10.1 GRAINS/L8)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.0B07
COLD TRANSIENT
1571. B (S?.0)
1122.1 (Sb.O)
13.3 (lin.O)
1037b
bn.7 (2113.0)
70. 7/ I/ 71
11. b/ 91 15
27.H/ 3/ b12
.)/ 3/ 2
1b.7/ 2/ 2.10
I.I/ 2/ .05
17. 8> 2/ IB
1.3/ 2/ 1
fc. 11
5R
hnn
2. Ob
1h. 7
?.OS
i?.in
22R1 . 1
S.Bb
.35 ( .57)
7.30 ( 11.75)
313.5 ( b33.l)
1.01 ( l.b?)
1 7.13 ( 13.57)
S.DO ( 3.bl)
STABILIZED
1571.8 (b2.
1122.1 JSb.
13.3 (110
17757
103.8 (3vj
11. b/ If
13. B/ 2/
l.b/13/
.S/13/
73. O/ 3/ 1
2. 1/ 3/
10. b/ ?/
.I/ 2/
in. 01
7
-------
TABLE F-3.VFMICIF EMJSSIUN RESULTS
FIPC
VfMICLF Nl).
II
ENfiTNF 11.11 L( -II CIO) V-B
TRANSMISSION A3
Gvw o *<".( -0 LHS)
8ARUMFTFR 733.01 MM HG(?8.Pt> IN MC)
DRY HllLH TEMP. ?*.1 Of G Ct7h.(l DEC F)
HAG RFSULTS
BAT, NuH.ru R
O'f P MM. H?0(1N. M?(l)
' MM. M?(l( ]>;. H?U)
[F.MP. PCG. C(I)Fr,. F)
HF VULUHO'IS
CVS FLOW STD. CU. MfIWfS(SCF)
HC
HC
ro
CO
CO?
co?
NOX
SAHpLf
MF
MFIFR/HANGE/PPM
"F TFR/fiAN(,F /PHM
•HI IFR/RANnf /PCT
Mf IF R/RANGF/PC f
SAMPLE Ht- I F'R/RAN(;f /PPM
I FR/R/iNOF/PI'M
FACTO1*
MC CONCENTRATION PPM
ro CONCENIRA r TON FPM
Cnp CONCFNTHAT ION PCT
NOX CONClMRAt IHN PPM
HC MAS;; r.RAMs
ro MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GHAM.S
N0» MASS GWAMS
HC GRAMS/KM (f.RAMS/MHF )
Co &RA^S/KH ( MAMS/M ILf )
ft'? GRAHT./KM
NOX GRAMS/KM 0(|
1188
13
.8
.1
.1
(b3.
(5b.
(110
0)
0)
.0)
HOT THANSItNT
IbOO
118?
.8
.1
13.3
in mi 17793
KU
B7.
Ib.
*qj
1?.'
1.
11.
1.
.3
7/
•>/
3S
*t
I/
}/
3/
k
C-'l 31
?/
?/
3/
8/ 8.
8/ .
8/
.'10
71
.1)
CM
Ib
_ I
3 '
7
11
05
11
1
1(13
11.
IS.
1.
n.
8.
11).
1.
.7
I/
B/
* / |
(1bb8.1)
8/
8/
. i
b ' 1 3 *
8/13/
B/
8/
8/
Of
1
Bb7
.
III.
1011
.
17.
i.
8.
1?
?
(ill
831
s
15
S5
.«
18
B7
70
(11
•f
.€,«
.11
». 7
.3?
( *
( Ib.
( hll
( ».
( 11.
( 1.
1.
1
3/ 1
3/
8/
8/
.17
h
1
30
.3
.31
.50
80
Ib
1
.31
.01
10
1
bO
31.
15.
(b3.
( 5b.
din
0)
U)
.IJ)
103b1
.»
5/
a/
L y ]
(?13
8/
8/
i /
.1/13/
"»8.
1.
8".
•
8171.1
78)
IB)
.")
IB)
Ih)
51)
•
•
317
.
Ib.
h.
8
05
08
.b
33
18
88
.0?
(
(
.01)
.13)
( hit.?)
(
I 13
( 3
.58)
.85)
.87)
•
•
317
9
11.
5.
I/
8/
3/
I/
7
1.
83
3
8/ 1
8/
8/
8/
.81
IB
11
Rl
.5
.h8
.IB
l.cf)
31
Ib
i
.85
.U1
81
1
enus.b
8
11
bO
.8
51
S7
7fl
.17
(
(
.17)
.17)
( 55H.b)
(
( 15
( 3
* U 1 )
.H8)
.SI)
.11 ( .81)
8.11 ( 1.85)
3R1.M (bin.5?)
.mi { .BO)
Ih.S" ( 11.IH)
-------
Nil. It
HltOfL ?<> MFW
ENGINF 5.7 t om CJI>)
GVW
*r.(
.ii ins)
8ARHfirtf»
OHY HHLH T
MP. ?C>.H etc, cm. '
F)
bAI". OFSUI I r-i
H»r. NinrtfK
OF sc"!*'' I DM
HI O«FH DIF p
Pio«fw tm.Fr
iMnwfw ini.tr
en
Cu^
Mf
Clt?
MIX
HF Vllt.U I IONS
OW sto. r.n. MF.r«r s(CT
xp 7ff /tfA^
iu; !M(/w» -
r.'Ti ut PIN FAC rn«
IT Cd'iCf MH* I (ON
ro cn^c i Mm t in1*
TIM ci'' i ION
MI* cn'«r> Nrm r ION
nr
f« ««SS (,W* M.S
f n ,^ i i .s s r, H * t s
tn
i i j
BPAMS/HM
MIX rH'Mfi/Kt
FIIFL CUNSOMPTION BY CH L/ I nnKM( MPC)
r*LCIlL«TrC DIbTANCF. KM
COMPOS I TF MP
CO GMAM3/KM
ro? fiM»n5
HIFL
(I;W»«:;/MII
TAPLE F-4. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
PROJECT NO.
r KIN BY c'- I/IIHIKM
1FST NO. 3 RUN
f'ATE «./10/79
1IME
tiYNO NO. S
CVS NO. 7
MAC CAHf NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
i
COLO TRANSIENT
|117lfl (57*.0)
1.1.3 (110. 0)
13. I/ */ 131
.I/ 3/ 7
i?. n/ ?/ 3.11
I.I/ Z/ .05
I.R/ ?/ a
h.05
1 1 1
SB?
3.B7
"ii!:
.bs ( i.n?)
Id. bb ( 17.15)
3"»3. b ( b33.3)
."0 ( 1.15)
17. hn ( 13. 3b)
?l ( .HS)
71 ( 1.35)
13 (bOS.5?)
IB ( ,7H)
H£ PCT
STABILIZED
IbQO.? (1-3,0)
1117.8 (57.0)
13.3 (110.0)
17790
103.7 Obbl.O)
U. ~>t 2/ ?*
21). S/ 2/ ?n
^.a/u/ s
1.3/13/ 1
73. OS 3/ 1.33
3.0/ 3/ .05
1.B/ 2/ 10
I.I/ 2/ 1
in. 09
5
1.28
8.5
.31
s'!!;i
.05 ( .08)
.07 ( .11)
3R8.5 ( b?'_ .?)
.31 ( .50)
Ib.bO C 11.18)
b.27 ( 3.90)
TEST WEIGHT
ACTU»L RO'3 L
GASOLINE tM-3
000«ETE« 1
GRAINS/LB) NO
3
HOT TRANSItNT
lbOO.2 (B3.U)
1117.8 (57. U)
13.3 (110. U)
10351
bO.3 (2130.0)
bb!5/12/ 150
Ilib/ 2/ 1.82
1.2/ 2/ .U1
23. b/ 2/ 23
Jl
110
1.79
2Kb
1.09
1972,1
i.17
.19 ( .JO)
I.b9 ( 2.72)
310.1 ( 51».2)
.H ( .80)
11. bb ( lb.U5)
S.RO ( 3.bO)
KG( 1SOO IBS)
8.9 Kri( ll.Q HP)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F. 1.1S3R
-------
VF.HICLE NO. it
VEMlCtf MUOFL 71 MF.k MAPQUIS
ENGINF. 5. 7 L( JM CtO) V-R
TRANSMISSION A3
GVX U KG( -n LRS)
BAROMFTFR 71R.h3 MM HG(?9.n8 IN HG)
DRY RUL8 TE*P. e?.8 OEf, C(71.0 OEG F)
BAG
tl
a\
H?0)
HAr, NUMIU.R
DESCRIPTION
RL1WER OIF P MM. HJO(IN.
BLOWFR INLET p MM. HPOU'
BLOWER INLET TEMP. DKG. CCOEC.
BLOWER Hf VOLUTIONS
CVS F|_OW 510. CU. METRF.S(S(.F)
METfP/RANGE/PPM
HC SAMPLE
HC BCKGI)D
CO SAMPLE
CO RCKGRD MF TER/RANGF./PPM
CO? SAMPLE
CO? BCKGRO
NOX SAMPLE METFR/RANGE/PPM
METER/RANGF/PPM
DILUTION FACTOR
HC CONCFNTWAFION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO^ CONCENTHA r ION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
.CO? MASS GHAMS
NOX MASS GRAMS
HC GR»MS/KM (GR«MS/MU.E)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MllO
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MHF)
NOX GHAMS/XM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUFL CONSUMPTION OY CR L/innKM(MPG)
CAtCUL*TFD OI3TANCE KM (MILES)
FTP
HC G>
HAG CART NO. 1
MF.LATIvE HimltlTY bl PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.9 GM/KG( 7b.h GRAINS/LH)
NOX HUMlOITt l.F
COLO
157H
1397
H3
TRANSIENT
.8
.0
.3
(be.
(55.
(110
0)
0)
.0)
STABILIZED
1S7H
1397
H3
103HS
bl
SR.
11.
SH.
m
H7.
1.
i".
.1
H/
O/
3/
f/
O/
?/
3/
3/
b
(215
2/
i/
3/
3/
2/ S
3/
2/
*'
.17
H9
9.8)
58
11
104
1H.
11.
,(J
.0
.3
(b2 .0
(55. 0
(110.
)
)
!l)
MOT
157H
1397
•»3
17752
."
h/
H/
(3705
2/
i/
5b2 B.7/13/
5
.11
.02
HI
1
3.
70.
n!
i.
5/13/
b/
7/
H/
If
10
525
2.
HO
1
37
10
•?
.73
.3b
2350.8
*
b.
HOb
.
17.
5.
4
30
H7
.9
82
RH
78
.7H
(
( 10
( b5
( 1
( 13
( 3
.HR)
.HO)
H.b)
.32)
.19)
.59)
.
3B2
.
lb.
b.
1.
9
3/ 1.
3/ .
I/
2/
.HR
^
5
2H
.9
.2b
.bl
,».)
15
11
B
3
28
OH
11
2
M
PS.
11.
b3.
1.
95.
2.
25.
1.
23BR.7
1
OH
in
.*
32
33
23
.99
( •
V •
( blS
( •
( JH.
( i.
07)
.3)
52)
HO)
87)
.
.
3H3
.
1H.
5.
TKAHSIt«T
.8
.1)
. 3
-------
VEHICLE NO. !•»
VEHICLE *0ntc 79 MER MARHUIS
ENGINF. s.7 LOSI CIO) V-H
TRANSMISSION A3
UVW 0 KG( -II LBS)
HAROMfTEH 7H?.'»'» MM KG(29.?.3 IN MG)
DHY HIM. 8 UMP. iH.n DEO C(7b.ll DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
RAG NUMUIR
DESCRIPTION
8LOWFR OIF P MM. H20(IN. HJU)
BI.OHF.R INLET P MM. M?O(I*. n?o)
81.0WF.R INLET IfMP. Off.. C(DEG. F)
SLOWER REVDLUTIONS
• cvs FLOH STO. cu. METRESO.CF)
TA»LE F-6. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
TEST NO. * HUN
DATE S/aj/7*
TIME
DYNO NO. 5
CVS NO. 7
HAG CART NO. 1
PROJECT Nil. 1 |
SAMPLE MEIER/KANGE/PPM
BCKGRO MEIER/RANGE/PPM
SAMPLE MEIEH/RANGE/PPM
MF.TEH/RANGE/PPM
METER/RAnGE/PCT
HC
Hf
CO
CO
coa
CD? HCKGRO MEIER/RANGE/PCT
NOX
NDX
FACTOR
MC CONCENTRAtlON PPM
CO CONCENfRAHnN PPM
CO? CO^CtNfRATlON PCT
NOX CONCENTHAlION PHM
HC MASS GKAMS
CO MASS GHAMS
CD? MASS GRAM3
NOX MASS GRAMS
MC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
co GHAMS/KM CUHAMS/MILE)
CU? GHAMO/KM (GHAH3/MJLE)
NOX GRAMS/KM (GRAHS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CS L/1 IH)KM(MPG)
CALCULATED DISTANCE KM (MRES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
MC GRAMS/KM (r.RAMS/MJI t >
co GH*MS/KM (GWAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX GHAMS/KM (GWAM3/MILE)
FOEL CONSUMPTION BY CH L/IKOKM (MPG)
ACTU»L
BASUL1NE
OOOItTE"
l.^h (
7».3<) {
.If (
lb.13 (
RELATIVE HUMIDITY se PCT
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY 10.2 GM/KGC 71.1 6RAINS/LH)
1JM
NOX HUMJOlTf C.F. .•»Hl'»
1
COLO TRANSIENT
3. It.)
3TA8ILUEO
HOT
taa.H (Sb.o)
H3.3 (110.0)
103*0
bi.e caiba.«o
70.H/ a/ 70
13. 3/ 2/ 13
3U.b/ 3/ 71b
.a/ 3/ s
Hb.8/ Z/ 8. 10
l.h/ ?/ .Ob
»b.l/ I/ »b
a. a/ a/ i
b.lS
59
b71
a, (>b
»t.3
tiae.* (Sb.o
13.3 (110.
17791)
105. » (3721
IS.*./ I/
12. 3/ 2/
1.8/13/
1.3/J3/
71. 3S 3/ 1.
3." 3/ .
12. ?/ a/
i.v a/
10.17
H
3
i.as
10. S
)
0]
.2)
It*
12
s
1
ai
0*
12
a
!»•>?. » (5b.
13.3 (llf!
1U3SO
bl.3 l?lh
as.n/ a/
ie.a/ a/
7Z.1/11/
1.7/13/
«n».a/ s/ i
?.8/ 3/
as,9/ a/
1.7/ «/
7.SS
1*
bb
1.73
e!''.*
U)
.U)
is
12
?l
?.
.77
.01
39b.8 ( bIB.S)
.BB ( l.»l)
17. 5H ( 13.1*!)
5.81 ( 3.bl)
,<*l
211B.3
a. n?
.O1* (
.07 (
3Bb.3 (
.33 (
Ib.SIl (
b.ah (
.117)
.11)
b21 .S)
.S3)
1* .tfb)
3.R9)
•«.71
i.Bl
.09 ( .!»)
.«! ( 1.31)
33H.S ( S3K.9)
.19 ( . >fl)
11. 3h ( IS. if)
S.dll { 3. ill)
.78)
t1.S«O
-------
TABLE F-7. VfHKlF EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
VEHICLE NO. l«
VEHICLE "OOEL 79 MER
fNGIMF 5,7 LMSl CIO) V-8
THANS»-ISSIflN 43
GVW n Kf,( -n IBS)
BAPO^ETFP, J»»'.
DRY miLM TF"P.
BAG
MM Hr;?9.3? IN HR1
l.» DEC C(7l.O OfG F)
DESCRIPTION
ni.n/,'EP niF P M«*. H?H(IH, n?n)
PLOwEP TNLFT P ' (59.0)
» 3 3 (110.0)
1033?
51. 9/ ?/ M
1"» . I/ ?/ 1*
Blil/11/ 1H9
.B/ll/ ?
i 3/ ?/ ns
ssih/ e/ »»
h.lb
1?
3kb
50.9
l.»7
?5!7R
"s^i
?5 ( .»!)
•»!»b ( 7^1*)
3d*. 9 ( b?5.7)
lb|93 ( 13|P9)
Ib7b.t (bb.U)
l»9H.b (59. P)
»3.3 (110,0)
17758
lb.»/ ?/ lh
1»,7/ ?/ 15
1.1/13/ 1
.S/13/ 0
b9.b/ S' l.fb
2.9S 3/ «0*
15;I/ I/ li
10. hS
3
t
1,19
11.1
.18
.in
i.07
,ni ,o«i)
|os ,o«)
37?, H 599, «»)
.33 .5-»)
15.9? 1<».7B)
t.,2? '•"*•)
TEST WEIGHT
ACTUAL ROAD L
GASOLINE EM- 3
OOOMETER 1
GRAINS/LH) NO
HOT TRANSIENT
Ib7h.» (hh.n)
lH9H.h (S9.ll)
•3.3 (110, n)
ho.i°("».»)
?3.?/ ?/ ?3
u,<»/ e/ i?
7».?/ll/ 73
, h/1 3/ 1
90, 5/ J/ I,b9
Z.h/ 3/ ,0t
?7.7/ Z/ ?8
7.89
13
h9
l.bS
?5,3
.»S
«,Bb
?.b9
.08 .1?)
.81 1.35)
• Jib, 7 509, b)
.17 ,75)
13.59 17.3?)
%,79 3,bO)
PROJECT NO. lJ-»»'»3-Oni
LPS)
KN( }?.n HP)
!Ub7
HUMIDITY C,F,
FUEL CONVi"PTin(J
14. »
< IS.M)
-------
TABLE F-8. VFHtCLt
"fSULTS
VEHICLE no. »•»
VFHKLE MODFL ?* HER MAROUIS
ENCTNF S.7 l.M?l CIO) V-«
TRANSMISSION A3
CVW o KG( -0 L8S)
BAROMF1ER 7Ht..?S MM MGCP't.^e IN HG)
DRY nilL1* TE'( (GRAMS/MJIE)
HO* GRAMS/KH (f.RAMS/MT(.F)
FUFL CONSUMPTION HV CB L/inOKM(MPG)
CAICtlLATFD DtSUNCF KM
COMPOSITF FTP
MC r,«?AM,VKM (GRAN3/MTIF)
CO GPAM'i/tM C("'"AMS/W[LF.)
CO? GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILf )
NOY ROANS/KM (GRAMS/MILE )
F|)FL CONSUMPTION BY CR I /inOKH (MPG)
.if (
tli1; (<
.»•» (
i.«.« f
h?.?/ ?/
»0.*/ K
S0.3/II/
.»/»5.h/ ?/
1.1/ ?/
/ 10
b.n/jj/ b
?n!i/ »/ ».ZT
?.»/ 3/ ,n-»
II.*/ t/ 1?
,B/ ?/ I
IO.S?
i.«i
II.f
I.OR
.OS ( .07)
.OB ( .IM
37b.S ( bOb.1)
.1? ( .SI)
ih.in ( it.^i)
b.?7 ( 3.MS)
?3
•s.«
l.»/13/ 1
B3.H/ 3/ l.7h
7.57
HI
1.71
Jb.S
isn.?
?.7R
."S ( .15)
,SR ( I.$»)
3^1.0 ( S3?.b)
.•»« ( .77)
l».?l ( Ib.Sb)
5.77 ( 3.SS)
-------
VEHICLE NO. i»
VEHICLE HODFL 1* HER HARQdTS
ENGINF 5.7 L(isi CID) v-n
TRANSMISSION A3
CVM 0 KG( -n LB3)
BAROMETER 715.71 MM HG(zi.3b IN HO
DRY Bl'L9 TEMP. ?3.1 DEG C(75.r, DEG F)
BAS RFSULTS
RAG DUMBER
DESCRIPTION
BLDHER OIF P MM. HJOdN. H?0)
INLET P MM. H?0(IN. H?0)
. . INLET TEM». DEC,. C(OEG. F)
BLOWER REVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. METRCS(SCF)
HC SAMPLE METFR/HAsGE/PPM
HC 9CKGPO METER/HANGF./PPM
ro SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
co ICKGRD METFR/RANGE/PPM
co? SAMPLE MEIER/RANGE/PCT
co?
MFTF.R/RANGE/PCT
NOX SAMPLE METER/RANGE/PPM
NOX 9C*GRO METER/RANGE/PPM
OILUT I (IN FACTOR
HC CONCENTRATION PPM
CO CONCENTRATION PPM
CO? CONCENTRATION PCT
NOX CONCENTRATION PPM
HC MASS GRAMS
CO MASS GRAMS
CO? MASS GRAMS
NOX MASS GRAM3
HC GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GKAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
NOX 5RAMS/HM (GRAMS/MILE)
FUEL CONSUMPTION BY CH L/100KH(MPC)
rALCULATtO DISTANCE KM (MILES)
COMPOSITE FTP RESULTS
HC CRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO GRAMS/KM (GRAMS/MILE)
CO? GRAMS/KM
NOX GRAMS/KM ..
FUEL CONSUMPTION RY CH L/imiKM (MPG)
F-9. VEHICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FTPC
PROJECT NO. ll-'»»l»3-0ni
TEST NO.
DATE
TIME
OYNO NO.
CVS NO.
RUN
TEST HEIGHT Jim KC(
ACTU*L RO*U LO*O •.•)
GASOLINE EH.jBb-P
UOS
«SO(I LBS)
KH( i?.n HP)
RAG CART NO. 1
RELATIVE HUMIDITY
ABSOLUTE HUMIDITY
I
COLD TRANSIENT
l-»«»7.(t (57. T)
>»J.3 (lln.O)
S8.7/ Z/ 11
|5.»/ Z/ 15
ll.l/ll/ «5S
.7/11/ t
1b.<«/ Z/ Z.ll
1.5/ Z/ .05
«1.b/ Z/ SO
1.3/ Z/ 1
Z.Ob
l.bZ
30.bl
.in ( .lb)
.?s ( j.n?)
(bll.'»l)
( .BO)
lb.1? ( It.*?)
374.
n »CT
B.J GM/K6(
STABILIZED
b (bt.T)
t (57.0)
3 (110.0)
17701
IMS. 5 (1725.8)
GRAINS/LB)
NOX HUMIDITY C.F.
«}.
15.»/ Z/
11.I/ Z/
Z.R/13/
.3/13/
7Z.3/ 3/ 1
?.*/ 3/
11.•»/ Z/
l.n/ Z/
in.zi
z
I.Z7
11.n
lb
1)
1
0
.31
'lZ
1
5.J8
S.?b ( 8.«h) .05
318.5 ( btl.3) 3^3.1
.11 ( l.tb) .33
|7.
-------
VEHICLE NO. It
VEHICLE MUOCL 'I MER
ENGINE 5.7 1(351 CID) V-B
TRANSMISSION A1
GVM n KGC -n UBS)
TABLE F-IO.Vf.HICLE EMISSION RESULTS
FtPC
TEST NO. £ RUN
DATE 5/17/7«!
TIME
0*NO NO. S
CVS NO. 7
HAG CART NO. 1
BAROMETER 7t3.q? MM HG(?i.?i IN MG)
ORV «i;LH TfMP. £3.3 DEC CC7Y.O DEC F)
BAG RESULTS
BAT, NUMBER
r>KSCH'.p7ION
OIF P MM
H20UN. H,?0)
"LOWER JULET P MM. H2CKIN. H?0)
INLET JEMP. OEG. C(DEG. F>
RCVOLUTIONS
CVS FLOW STO. CU. MET«CS(Sl.F)
HC SAMpLE
HC f)c>
-------
|