WATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH SERIES • 12040 EMY 12/71
Multi-System Biological Treatment
of Bleached Kraft Effluents
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
-------
SATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH SERIES
the Water Pollution Control Research Series describes the
results and progress in the control and abatement of pollution
in our Nation*s waters. They provide a central source of
information on the research, development, and demonstration
activities in the Environmental Protection Agency, through
inhouse research, and grants and contracts with Federal, State,
and local agencies, research institutions, and industrial
organizations,
Inquiries pertaining to Water Pollution Control Research Reports
should be directed to the Head, Publications Branch (Water),
Research Information Division, R&M, Environmental Protection
.Agency, Washington, D.C. 20460.
-------
MULTI-SYSTEM BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT
OF BLEACHED KRAFT EFFLUENTS
The Mead Corporation
Chillicothe, Ohio 45601
for the
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
INDUSTRIAL POLLUTION CONTROL
Program Number 12040 EMI
Grant Number WPRD-55
December, 1971
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 20402 - Price $2
-------
EPA Review Notice
This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Protection
and approved for publication. Approval does not signify
that the contents necessarily reflect the views and policies
of the Environmental Protection Agency nor does mention of
trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or
recommendation for use.
11
-------
ABSTRACT
A multi-unit pilot plant of significant scale was used to study the
biological treatment of integrated kraft pulp and paper wastewaters after
conventional primary clarification. The biological units in the project
included two high-rate trickling filters packed with PVC media, an oxida-
tion ditch with brush-type aeration, and an earthen lagoon with mechanical
surface aeration.
Many alternates were possible because the main feed could be excluded
from one or more biological units and, in its place, any of the pilot unit
effluents except the aerated lagoon could be pumped back to the main weir
box for feed. Simultaneous series and parallel operation of the four
biological systems was thus possible. The combinations using normal
strength wastewater included:
a) Trickling filters in series
b) Trickling filter to aerated lagoon
c) Oxidation ditch to aerated lagoon
d) Oxidation ditch to trickling filter.
Black liquor was added to the clarified effluent on a continuous basis for
a limited period of time in order to elevate the BOD level from approxi-
mately 200 mg/1 to approximately 500 mg/1 and the following combinations
were tested:
a) Trickling filter to oxidation ditch to trickling filter
b) Trickling filter to aerated lagoon
c) Trickling filters in series followed by oxidation ditch.
Best efficiencies at normal effluent strength were obtained on the pilot
oxidation ditch when run with clarification and sludge return as the ex-
tended aeration process. BOD,, removals as high as 94 percent were possible.
The trickling filter with sludge recycle performed slightly better than the
conventioi
possible.
conventional trickling filter. BOD removals of 60 to 70 percent were
The conventional aerated lagoon at short detention times was improved by
clarification of the treated effluent. BOD removals of 80 percent were
possible.
Much information is presented on the pilot unit performances; many of the
data have been mathematically modeled. Also presented are results from
support studies which included nutrient testing, velocities within the
aeration basins and many others.
This report is submitted in fulfillment of Grant No. WPRD-55 (12040 EMY)
between the Federal Water Quality Administration and The Mead Corporation.
Key Words: Trickling Filters, Aerated Lagoon, Oxidation Ditch, Sludge
Return, BOD Removal, Pulp and Paper Industry.
ill
-------
CONTENTS
Section
I Summary of Results and Conclusions •*•
jj Recommendations '
III Introduction 9
Biological Treatment of Kraft Mill Effluents
Project Purpose and Need
IV The Pilot Project -11
The Pilot Plant
Pilot Scale
Project Plans
Presentation of Data
General Aspects of Mathematical Modeling
V The Pilot Plant Feed Source ^1
VI Trickling Filter Treatment ^5
The Trickling Filter Process
Project Results on Pilot Trickling Filters
Mathematical Models of Trickling Filter Results
cq
VII Aerated Lagoon Treatment JJ
The Aerated Lagoon Process
Project Results on Pilot Aerated Lagoon
Mathematical Model of Aerated Lagoon Results
VIII Oxidation Ditch Treatment °5
The Oxidation Ditch Process
Project Results on Pilot Oxidation Ditch
Mathematical Models of Oxidation Ditch Results
IX Combination Treatment 77
Alternates for Combination Treatment
Project Results on Pilot Plant Combinations
Applicability of Mathematical Models to Combination
Treatment
X Support Studies "J-
Aeration and Mixing in Pilot Aeration Basins
Special BOD Studies
Dye Studies on Pilot Systems
Aeration Basin Oxygen Uptake Rates
Sludge Volume Index
Nitrogen and Phosphorus Levels
Chemical and Power Costs for Pilot Plant Operation
XI Procedures
XII Acknowledgments
XEII References
XIV Glossary of Terms 133
XV Appendix •*-*'
-------
FIGURES
1 Overall View of Pilot Plant System 18
2 Schematic Diagram of Pilot Treatment Plant 19
3 Trickling Filter 1 With 1:1 Recycle 42
4 Pilot Trickling Filters With "0" Recycle 43
5 Trickling Filters at Other Recycle Rates 44
6 Trickling Filter 2 With 1:1 Recycle Ratio 45
7 Determination of "n" From Dye Studies on Filters 46
8 Model for Trickling Filter 1 47
9 Model for Trickling Filter 2 48
10 Trickling Filter Response to Sludge Recirculation 49
11 Lagoon and Ditch Without Clarification 61
12 Pilot Aerated Lagoon With Settled BOD's 62
13 Model for Pilot Aerated Lagoon 63
14 Pilot Oxidation Ditch With Sludge Return 73
15 Model for Pilot Oxidation Ditch 74
16 Schematic Diagram Showing Alternate A 83
17 Schematic Diagram Showing Alternate B 84
18 Schematic Diagram Showing Alternate C 85
19 Schematic Diagram Showing Alternate D 86
20 Schematic Diagram Showing Alternate E 87
21 Schematic Diagram Showing Alternate F SB
22 Schematic Diagram Showing Alternate G 89
23 Trickling Filters Preceded by Treatment 90
24 Test Point Location in Pilot Aeration Basins 103
vi
-------
TABLES
No. Page
1 Summary of Best Pilot Treatment BOD Results 5
2 Summary of Mathematical Models for Pilot Units 8
3 Completed Project Plans for All Systems 20
4 Identification of Different Pilot Plant Feeds 23
5 Summary of BOD Results on Trickling Filter With Sludge 36
Recycle
6 Summary of Solids Results on Trickling Filter With 37
Sludge Recycle
7 Summary of Color, pH, and Nutrient Results on Trickling 38
Filter With Sludge Recycle
8 Summary of BOD Results on Trickling Filter With Filtrate 39
Recycle
9 Summary of Solids Results on Trickling Filter With Filtrate 40
Recycle
10 Summary of Color, pH, and Nutrient Results on Trickling Filter 41
With Filtrate Recycle
11 Comparison of Observed Efficiencies and TF1 Model 50
12 Comparison of Observed Efficiencies and TF2 Model 51
13 Summary of Aerated Lagoon BOD Results 58
14 Summary of Aerated Lagoon Solids Results 59
15 Summary of Aerated Lagoon Color, pH, and Nutrient Results 60
16 Comparison of Observed Efficiencies and Aerated Lagoon Model 64
17 Summary of Oxidation Ditch BOD Results 70
18 Summary of Oxidation Ditch Solids Results 71
19 Summary of Oxidation Ditch Color, pH, and Nutrient Results 72
20 Comparison of Observed Efficiencies and Oxidation Ditch Model 75
21 Power Loadings and BOD Removals in Aeration Basins 104
vii
-------
No. Page
22 Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature in Pilot Aerated Lagoon 105
23 Velocities and Directions in Pilot Aerated Lagoon 106
24 History of Sludge Buildup in Pilot Aerated Lagoon 107
25 Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature in Pilot Ditch 108
26 Velocities in Pilot Oxidation Ditch 109
27 Summary of Average BOD Fractions and COD Ratios 110
28 Oxygen Uptake Determinations in Pilot Aerated Lagoon 1.1H.
29 Summary of Sludge Volume Index on Pilot Clarifiers 112
30 Summary of Nutrient Test Results on Mill Clarifier and Pilot 113
Feed
31 Total and Soluble Nutrient Test Results on Trickling Filter 1 114
32 Total and Soluble Nutrient Test Results on Trickling Filter 2 115
33 Total and Soluble Nutrient Test Results on Aerated Lagoon 116
34 Total and Soluble Nutrient Test Results on Oxidation Ditch 11?
35 Summary of Chemical and Power Costs for Total Pilot Plant US
Operation
36 Summary of Chemical Usage on Trickling Filter With Sludge 119
Recycle
37 Summary of Chemical Usage on Trickling Filter With Filtrate 120
Recycle
38 Summary of Aerated Lagoon Chemical Usage Results 121
39 Summary of Oxidation Ditch Chemical Usage 122
40 Drainage Frequency of Aeration Basins 133
41 Sludge Wasting Program on Clarifier 1 139
42 141
thru Summary of Pilot Treatment Unit Results by Test
111
Sheets 1 thru 60 Listing of Individual Data by Date 211
viii
-------
SECTION I SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS
The most significant findings of this project pertain to reductions of
biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) in the kraft pulp and paper mill effluent
which was studied. This same effluent was dosed to a higher BOD level
in several test series for a comparison with treatment of normal strength
effluent. The BOD reductions which were accomplished by trickling fil-
tration, the aerated lagoon, and the oxidation ditch process both in
parallel operation and in combinations will be presented in this SUMMARY.
Additional detail and results from support studies are presented in
subsequent SECTIONS and may be used for other conclusions in answer to
specific questions or situations.
Tjrickling Filter Treatment of Kraft Effluent After Primary Clarification
The high-rate plastic-media trickling filter with 1:1 recycle and nutrient
addition is shown to be capable of consistently removing 60 to 70 percent
of the applied BOD at hydraulic loading rates up to 4000 gallons per day
per square foot ana organic loading rates as high as 140 pounds of BOD
per day per 1000 cubic feet of media volume at temperatures generally
above 25°C. Additional detail on test conditions and loading rates are
found in SECTION IV of this report.
With nutrient addition but no recycle, the removal efficiency drops to
less than 50 percent at similar and higher loading rates.
The recycle of sludge back to the trickling filter does not adversely
affect the treatment operation and may provide a satisfactory method for
significantly reducing the excess sludge which must be handled after
biological treatment. In addition, significantly less nutrients are con-
sumed when sludge is recycled. No advantage was taken of this finding
during this project.
Aerated Lagoon Treatment of Kraft Effluent After Primary Clarification
The conventional aerated lagoon with nutrient addition and without second-
ary clarification is shown to produce a variable treatment efficiency
ranging from 35 to 80 percent for detention times of 1.5 to 3.8 days at
temperatures ranging from 16 to 30°C. Test conditions and loading rates
are detailed in SECTION V of this report.
Secondary clarification of these same aerated lagoon effluents is shown
to produce a fairly consistent treatment efficiency at or above 80 percent
BOD removal.
Oxidation Ditch Treatment of Kraft Effluent After Primary Clarification
The oxidation ditch with nutrient addition when operated as an extended
aeration process (i.e., with clarification and total sludge return) is
shown to produce high treatment efficiencies. At one-day detention,
-------
treatment efficiencies ranged from 68 to 86 percent BOD removal. At
two-day detention, the efficiencies ranged from 80 to as high as 94 per-
cent. Temperatures ranged from 16 to 30°C. Test conditions and loading
rates are detailed in SECTION VI of this report.
Since excess sludge was not wasted on a routine basis, such operation of
the oxidation ditch may provide a satisfactory method for significantly
reducing the problems of secondary sludge disposal which do occur with
other high-efficiency biological systems. Nutrient consumption with such
operation was the lowest of any system studied in this project.
Combination Treatment of Kraft Effluent After Primary Clarification
Five different combinations of the biological treatment processes were
tested in 7 separate tests. The test conditions and loading rates are
detailed in SECTION VII of this report. The following general results
were found.
A roughing trickling filter preceding the conventional aerated lagoon
improves the overall BOD^ removal by 5 percent over that obtained by the
aerated lagoon alone.
A polishing trickling filter following the oxidation ditch process im-
proves the overall BOD^ removal by less than one percent over that
obtained by the oxidation ditch process alone.
The two trickling filters in series improve the overall BOD removal by
20 percent on the average over that obtained by a single trickling filter.
The aerated lagoon was not able to reduce the BOD concentration fed from
the oxidation ditch process although some improvement should result if
the final lagoon is allowed to reach equilibrium. The need for aeration
in such a lagoon is doubted.
Treatment of Black Liquor-Dosed Kraft Effluent
The regular kraft effluent from the primary clarifier was dosed with black
liquor to produce BOD levels above 500 mg/1 contrasted to 200 mg/1 in
the regular effluent used in the previous tests. A total of 3 individual
tests and 5 combination tests were run with the following findings.
The high-rate plastic-media trickling filter with filtrate recycle is
shown to be capable of removing 42 percent of the applied BOD at an
organic loading of 620 pounds of BOD,, per day per 1000 cubic feet of media.
With no recycle, the removal efficiency on the black liquor-dosed feed
drops to less than 15 percent at an organic loading of 1070 pounds of BOD,.
per day per 1000 cubic feet.
-------
The conventional aerated lagoon without secondary clarification is shown
to produce a treatment efficiency of 81 percent for a detention time of
7 days at a temperature of 23°C. Clarification of this effluent does not
significantly improve the treatment efficiency as was the case at shorter
detention times. The carryover of solids in the lagoon effluent is
therefore seen to be a function of detention time in the lagoon.
A roughing trickling filter preceding the conventional aerated lagoon
improves the overall BOD removal by 6 percent over that obtained by the
aerated lagoon alone at 1.8 days detention.
A single roughing trickling filter preceding the oxidation ditch process
does not significantly improve the overall BOD removal over that obtained
by the oxidation ditch process alone.
A polishing trickling filter following the roughing trickling filter-
oxidation ditch combination does not further improve the BOD removal.
Two trickling filters in series preceding the oxidation ditch process do
improve the overall BOD removal by 14 percent over that obtained by the
oxidation ditch process alone.
The two trickling filters in series improve the overall BOD removal by
14 percent over that obtained by the first trickling filter alone.
Chemical and Power Needs for Treatment
Nitrogen and phosphorus are required as nutrients to achieve the BOD re-
ductions detailed above. Using bulk prices for ammonia and phosphoric
acid nutrient sources, the average chemical cost at 100:5:1 BOD:N:P feed
ratio is approximately 0.4 cents per pound of applied BOD,.. A lower
nutrient feed rate should be adequate but was not attempted in this
project. SECTION VIII of this report details the measured consumption
rate of nutrients in each of the biological treatment units for each
test series.
Power consumption of the turbine and brush type surface aerators is a
function of aerator submergence. SECTION VIII also details the net power
input per 1000 gallons of aeration basin capacity and the resulting
degree of mixing and the BOD,, removal rates at various power inputs.
Best Treatment Results
TABLE 1 (page xiii) contains a summary of the best treatment results
obtainable during this project. Each test is identified by unit
process abbreviation as follows:
-------
TF1 for Trickling Filter with Sludge Recycle
TF2 for Trickling Filter with Filtrate Recycle
AL for Aerated Lagoon
OD for Oxidation Ditch
CL2 for Clarifier 2 normally used with OD
The test number follows the unit process so that OD-8 means Oxidation
Ditch Test Number 8; or TF2-1 means Test Number 1 on Trickling Filter
with Filtrate Recycle.
This symbolism is being introduced now for the benefit of the reader who
may venture beyond the RECOMMENDATIONS of this report to learn the actual
test conditions and study the detailed test results.
-------
SUMMARY OF BEST PILOT TREATMENT BOD RESULTS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Overall
Treatment Identification
Removal
Treated
Effluent
BODC (mg/1)
SINGLE PROCESS TREATMENT OF CLARIFIED KRAFT EFFLUENT
OD-7 with CL2
OD-8 with CL2
OD-6 with CL2
AL-10
AL-6
AL-5
OD-5 with CL2
TF1-4
TF1-15
OD-3 with CL2
AL-7
TF1-11
TF1-1
TF2-5
OD-4 with CL2
TF2-7
TF1-5
93.7%
89.8%
86.6%
84.2%
81.9%
82.3%
81.4%
79.5%
72.8%
80.0%
76.1%
68.6%
67.5%
63.1%
64.7%
65.4%
60.0%
12
19
29
35
38
39
39
43
46
46
49
62
73
74
77
79
80
SINGLE PROCESS TREATMENT OF BLACK LIQUOR-DOSED EFFLUENT
AL-13 83.3% 104
TF2-18 42.1% 366
(Note: TF1 and OD were not operated as separate processes during
black liquor studies.)
COMBINATION TREATMENT OF CLARIFIED KRAFT EFFLUENT
OD-8 with CL2 to TF2-15
TF1-14 to TF2-14
TF1-16 to AL-11
TF1-11 to TF2-11
TF2-13 to TF1-13
90.4%
84.7%
85.8%
70.7%
63.8%
COMBINATION TREATMENT OF BLACK LIQUOR-DOSED EFFLUENT
TF2-18 to TF1-18 to OD-10 with CL2
TF2-17 to OD-9 with CL2
TF2-17 to AL-12
TF2-18 to TF1-18
89.5%
85.6%
74.1%
56.9%
16
31
40
58
87
65
88
146
273
NOTE: All test conditions and loading parameters can be found in
TABLE 3 (page 12) and are detailed in subsequent report SEC-
TIONS. All BOD values were obtained from settled samples.
The settling was accomplished in the field for OD and TF1.
Imhoff cones were used for TF2 and AL to simulate field
settling.
TABLE 1
-------
SECTION II RECOMMENDATIONS
Recommended Use of Project Results
Utilization of the many findings of this project could be difficult with-
out a guide of some type. Therefore the following guide is offered:
1. The relative efficiencies found in the work of this project for the
several treatment processes under study should hold for any given efflu-
ent having characteristics similar to the effluent used in this project.
2. All absolute findings on BOD removal pertain to the treatment of a
specific integrated kraft pulp and paper effluent after primary clarifi-
cation or this same effluent after being dosed to a higher BOD
concentration by the addition of kraft black liquor.
3. The removal of BOD when black liquor was not being added can be pre-
dicted for the project wastewater by any of the specific treatment unit
models contained in TABLE 2 (pagexvi). The "constraints" and "range of
values" are basic to these models and must be obeyed if the "constants"
are to be meaningful.
4. For the similar treatment of effluents different from the project
wastewater for which the models were developed, similar mathematical forms
only with different constants would be expected. These constants would
have to be developed on each specific wastewater by methods such as de-
tailed by Eckenfelder and Ford (9).
5. The removal of BOD when black liquor was being added cannot be pre-
dicted by the models in TABLE 2. Treatment of the project wastewater as
dosed would have to be predicted on a comparative basis using those results
actually obtained and which are presented in later SECTIONS of this report.
6. The removal of BOD by combinations of the treatment processes in this
project cannot be predicted by the models in TABLE 2. Rather, the same
comparative basis with actual results would be necessary.
7. Those findings which pertain to mixing, basin hydraulics, and other
support studies not dependent upon the effluent character are applicable
to similar situations at other locations (see SECTION VIII).
Recommended Future Work
The general area of nutrient addition rates for biological treatment should
be studied with the objective of controlling these rates to optimum levels.
Further work should also be directed toward determining the extent to
which the high efficiencies of the oxidation ditch process shown in this
project could be accomplished in a short-term aerated lagoon with clari-
fication and sludge return. Such a system, if found possible, could use
existing or modified treatment facilities to enable high efficiencies at
greatly reduced land requirements.
-------
I
NJ
C»
SUMMARY OF MATHEMATICAL MODELS FOR PILOT UNITS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TF1
TF2
AL
OD
unit ;
Model:
Constraints:
Constants:
Range of Values Used
in Model Development
N Recycle Rate:
Q (gpm/sf)
D (feet)
t (days)
T (°C)
X (mg/1 MLVSS)
S (mg/1 BOD )
S3 (mg/1 BOD^)
S° (mg/1 BOD^)
F?M 5
NOTES: Feed in all
S F
a
e 1 + N-NF
where
F = exp[-KeT~2°D/Qn]
A = 37 sf/cf
V
100% Sludge Return
to top of Filter
6 assumed = 1.035
n = 1.2
K = 0.063
;
0-5
1.4 - 5.6
22 - 24
Not Applicable
21 - 35
Not Applicable
169 - 295
A3 - 185
Not Applicable
cases is integrated kraft
, . . -i _ i . _ _ i .
S F
n = a
e 1 + N-NF
where
F = exp[-KeT"2°D/qn]
A = 37 sf/cf
V
No Sludge Return
8 assumed = 1.035
n = 1.2
K = 0.057
0-2
1.4 - 4.2
16 - 24
Not Applicable
25 - 35
Not Applicable
193 - 295
74 - 181
Not Applicable
pulp and paper effluent
S
s •• °
e i + keT-20t
No Sludge Return
k = 1.424
9 = 1.023
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
6.7 - 7.7
2.3 - 3.8
14 - 24
114 - 528
206 - 222
35 - 46
0.07 - 0.59
S
s - °
e i + ke1
-20t
100% Sludge Return
Average
F/M = 0.06
k = 0.92
0 = 1.256
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
4.0 - 8.6
2
22 - 29
1555 - 2848
185 - 209
12 - 39
0.04 - 0.09
Average
F/M = 0.3
k = 3.37
9 = 1.063
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
5.2 - 7.0
1
23 - 30
613 - 1395
215 - 229
29 - 46
0.14 - 0.33
after primary treatment.
-------
SECTION III
INTRODUCTION
Biological Treatment of Kraft Mill Effluents
The sulfate or "kraft" process now dominates the chemical pulping field.
A total of 113 kraft mills in operation in the United States in 1969 pro-
duced 78 percent of all chemical pulp (13).
The kraft pulping process utilizes a cooking liquor mixture of sodium
hydroxide, carbonate, sulfide, and sulfate (19) which allows a strong pulp
to be produced from almost any wood species. The waste liquor can be put
through a furnace for recovery of the sodium and sulfur compounds for
material reuse and production of heat from the wood pulping waste products.
Such a recovery process significantly reduces the potential for stream
pollution. These factors make the kraft pulping process practical,
economical and, therefore, widespread.
The National Council of the Paper Industry for Air and Stream Improvement
has reviewed the status of effluent treatment in the U. S. segment of the
industry and reports the following (13):
1. Approximately 49 percent of the U. S. kraft mills provide secondary
treatment of some type.
2. 47 percent of these mills have installed storage oxidation basins
(26 mills with 36 percent of total treated flow).
3. 31 percent have installed aerated stabilization basins (17 mills
with 39 percent of total treated flow).
4. 16 percent have installed activated sludge (9 mills with 20 percent
of total treated flow).
5. Less than 4 percent have trickling filters (2 mills with 2 percent
of total treated flow).
6. One mill with 2.5 percent of the total treated flow has employed
other means of secondary treatment.
It is concluded that secondary treatment in the kraft pulping industry
means biological treatment of some type rather than chemical treatment.
Whether this tendency changes in the future remains to be seen. However,
the biodegradable characteristics of these process effluents do favor
biological treatment.
-------
Project Purpose and Need
The overall project objectives as stated in the revised application are:
1. To determine effect of influent solids and organics on biological
process treatment efficiencies.
2. To evaluate potential of plastic trickling filters as:
a. Main process for biological treatment
b. Roughing filters prior to conventional aerated lagoons
c. Roughing filters prior to and polishing filters after
oxidation ditch utilizing the brush-type aerator.
3. To evaluate role of secondary clarification and sludge return in
conjunction with biological methods described above.
4. To evaluate combinations of the methods of treatment discussed above
in providing higher levels of organic and solids removals than are
conventionally obtained. BOD removals up to 90 percent should be
possible.
The need for such a project was brought about by the rising requirements
for effluent treatment efficiency coupled with the fact that activated
sludge processes, while capable of producing these high efficiencies, are
also plagued with such undesirable traits as susceptibility to shock
loads, close supervision requirements and high capital and operating costs.
This project was directed toward studying the capabilities of other
biological treatment processes, both singularly and in combination, in an
attempt to find a satisfactory substitute for the expensive and difficult-
to-operate conventional activated sludge process.
Award^ of Grant to The Mead Corporation
The need for such a project was outlined by The Mead Corporation to the
Federal Water Quality Administration (FWQA, but previously FWPCA) in late
1966. Under the Water Quality Act of 1965 and the amendment by the Clean
Water Restoration Act of 1966, Federal funds were made available for the
first time to private companies and industries for research and demon-
stration programs designed to reduce the problems of water pollution.
This project was granted in late 1966. The design and construction of
the pilot plant were completed in early 1968. The actual field testing
for the project was conducted in 4 phases spanning June 1968 to May 1970.
Three progress reports have already been submitted (1)(2)(3). The present
report is the final report of the project and will present all findings to
date, including those previously contained in the three progress reports.
20
-------
SECTION IV
THE PILOT PROJECT
The Pilot Plant
FIGURE 1 (page 10) is an overall view of the pilot plant system as con-
structed and FIGURE 2 (page 11) is a schematic diagram showing the
individual units which will be described below.
Pilot Trickling Filters (TF1 and TF2)
The trickling filters were two columns of plastic-type media in three
8-foot sections supported independently on a 4-story steel beam structure.
Access stairs and walkways, media storage, flow splitting boxes and piping
for other systems were also supported by this structure.
Each trickling filter media column was 24 feet high with a surface area
of 16 square feet. The media was Koroseal Vinyl Pack (PVC) supplied by
B. F. Goodrich. Each pack was 2 feet by 2 feet by 4 feet and weighed
34 pounds.
Trickling Filter 2 (TF2) was run at a media height of 16 feet for two
tests, and Trickling Filter 1 (TF1) at 22 feet for two tests. All other
tests were conducted at 24 feet due to the difficulty encountered in
removing the growth-laden media.
The Trickling Filters were run in parallel and series, as roughing and
polishing filters for the oxidation ditch, and as a roughing filter ahead
of the aerated lagoon for a total of 18 separate tests on each filter.
TF1 recycled sludge, while TF2 recycled filter effluent in the conven-
tional manner.
Recycle rates from 0:1 to 5:1 (recycle to feed) were tested on TF1. On
TF2, rates of 0:1 to 2:1 were utilized. Hydraulic loadings as high as
8000 gallons per day per square foot were applied to TF1, while 6000
gpd/sf was the maximum applied to TF2.
TF2 was run ahead of the Rex clarifier during the initial stage of the
project. Later, when this clarifier was used with the oxidation ditch,
the filter effluent samples were settled in the laboratory as simulation
of field clarification.
The two Trickling Filters as constructed were each a complete system and
did not depend upon any other unit for independent operation except for
the flow splitting box and main feed pumps.
11
-------
Pilot Aerated Lagoon Unit (AL)
The Aerated Lagoon (AL) was a square earthen basin with rounded corners
and sloping sides lined with 20 mil polyvinyl chloride (PVC). It had a
steel truss bridge for walkway and support for the 3 horsepower turbine
aerator supplied by Mixing Equipment Company. The aerator had a diameter
of 29 inches and operated at 84 revolutions per minute.
The depth (and corresponding surface area and volume) was varied from
5 feet to 7.7 feet by means of an adjustable overflow dam. The volume
increased from 88,500 gallons at 5 feet depth to 162,300 gallons at
7.7 feet depth.
Detention time was varied from 1.4 to 7.0 days by means of the flow
splitting weir box provided.
Aerator power consumption was monitored by a 3-phase wattmeter. Power
consumption was varied by adjusting submergence of the turbine at the
aerator shaft or varying overflow height at the dam.
Lagoon velocities, flow direction and bottom sludge were monitored from
the bridge using special equipment as discussed in PROCEDURES.
The lagoon was operated in series four times, once behind Trickling
Filter 1, once behind Trickling Filter 2, and twice behind the Oxidation
Ditch. In an additional nine tests, the lagoon was operated parallel
to the other pilot units.
The lagoon was constructed as a complete system and did not depend on
any other unit for its operation except the flow splitting box and main
feed pumps.
Pilot Oxidation Ditch Unit (OD)
The Oxidation Ditch (OD) was an elongated oval basin with vertical sides
of reinforced concrete and rounded ends of steel plate. A center column
supported the flow baffles, mid feather and steel walkway. Massive
concrete pillars supported the brush-type aerator. The major portion
of construction was above ground, due to space limitations.
The OD unit was 11 feet high with a maximum liquid depth of 10 feet.
Each foot of depth equalled 22,500 gallons volume. The surface area
was a constant 3,005 square feet.
The 10 horsepower massive rotor aerator was supplied by Beloit Passavant.
This brush-type aerator had a width of 66 inches and operated at 65 revo-
lutions per minute.
12
-------
The ditch depth (and corresponding volume) was varied from 4 feet to
8.6 feet by means of a standpipe and a unique flexible joint embedded in
the bottom. Detention time was varied from 1 to 3 days utilizing the
flow splitting weir box.
The ditch contents were overflowed in the channel downstream from the
brush aerator. The feed was added in the channel upstream of the aerator.
Either of the two functions could have been handled upstream of or down-
stream from the aerator.
Velocities and bottom sludge were monitored in the channel upstream,
downstream and opposite the aerator, as discussed later.
Aerator power consumption was monitored by a 3-phase wattmeter. Brush
submergence was kept constant during the project by utilizing the stand-
pipe for adjustment.
In 8 tests the ditch was operated as an extended aeration activated sludge
unit with sludge return from the Rex secondary clarifier. This sludge
was added just upstream of the aerator close to the regular feed point.
During part of these tests the ditch was run in series ahead of or behind
the trickling filters and ahead of the aerated lagoon. The remaining two
tests were without sludge return as in the aerated lagoon process.
The OD as constructed, was a complete system, and did not depend upon any
other unit for its independent operation except for the flow splitting
box and main feed pumps.
Pilot Clarifier Units (Clarifier 1 and Clarifier 2)
The clarifiers used were a rim flow with sludge arm, and a center feed
with a cone bottom and center mixing. Both were of steel plate con-
struction.
The rim flow unit (Clarifier 2) was 12 feet in diameter overall, with
11 feet comprising the settling zone. The height was 11.5 feet, giving
a settling zone of 8150 gallons and a detention time greater than one
hour for high design flows. The cone bottom unit (Clarifier 1) had a
15-foot overall diameter with a depth of 11.5 feet for a total volume of
9900 gallons. This volume represented three zones; mixing zone of
4975 gallons, settling zone of 3635 gallons, and a sludge zone of 1290
gallons.
The Rim Flow, Tow Bro Clarifier mechanism was supplied by Rex Chain Belt.
The Rex unit was used with Trickling Filter 2 and the Oxidation Ditch.
The cone bottom unit was used with Trickling Filter 1 exclusively.
The sludge withdrawal rate was varied as required by means of the unique
pumping and piping system. Sludge was pumped back into the respective
systems or wasted if necessary.
13
-------
Pumps for Pilot System
Two main feed pumps and six smaller process pumps permitted the return of
virtually any treated or untreated effluent to any pilot treatment system.
Many independent and dependent flow systems were provided. The pumps were
supplied by Goulds and Yeoman. The piping was plastic, PVC and black iron,
while all valves were cast iron.
Electrical Power for Pilot System
550 volt, 3-phase electricity was supplied to the pilot site control
center. Separate breakers and switches were provided for each of the two
main feed pumps, each of the six process pumps, the Rex clarifier mechan-
ism, the Mixco aerator and the Beloit brush. A transformer reduced the
voltage to 110-220 volts for pilot area lighting, control center lighting
and receptacles, and sampling station receptacles at each pilot unit.
Pilot Scale
The pilot systems for this project were built large enough to minimize the
effect of pilot to full scale data extrapolation. Flow rates to the Trick-
ling Filters ranged from 11 to 67 gpm (16,000 to 96,500 gpd). For the
Aerated Lagoon, the flow rate was varied from 16 to 80 gpm (23,000 to
115,200 gpd). The Oxidation Ditch influent rates were varied from 31 to
109 gpm (45,000 to 157,000 gpd).
Project Plans
A total of 59 separate tests were run on the pilot units between June 10,
1968 and May 1, 1970. Each Trickling Filter had 18 separate tests, the
Aerated Lagoon was tested 13 times, and the Oxidation Ditch had 10 tests
completed.
TABLE 3 (page 12)shows the completed project plans for all systems with the
independent variables identified and the test settings given.
In the second and fourth columns of this TABLE, the units and tests are
identified by symbols as follows:
PF for Pilot Feed (clarified mill effluent with nutrients added)
TF1 for Trickling Filter 1
TF2 for Trickling Filter 2
AL for Aerated Lagoon
CL1 for Clarifier 1
CL2 for Clarifier 2
Tests are identified by unit and test number, as in TF1-1 for
Test Number 1 on Trickling Filter 1.
-------
Presentation of Data
All data were reviewed and edited with respect to validity of the indi-
vidual BOD results and unusually large variation in the characteristics
of the pilot unit feed. These edited data were then averaged over that
time believed to represent acclimation at the test conditions. This
acclimation period was taken consecutively and always included the last
week of test results except where temperature or feed BOD extremes
deviated greatly from previous weeks. Data results and analysis will be
presented in subsequent SECTIONS of this report.
General Aspects of Mathematical Modeling
The term mathematical modeling as it applies to biological systems is the
derivation of a mathematical expression which defines the treatment
efficiency or effluent concentration to be anticipated from a particular
biological system. It relates the various parameters which bear influence
upon the anticipated removal or effluent. In general, a given biological
system and its performance will be a function of the effluent being
treated, the makeup of the biomass which is accomplishing this treatment,
and other parameters such as detention time, temperature, and certain
reaction rate constants. These constants take into account the relation
between the particular effluent being treated and the biological system
accomplishing this treatment.
Mathematical models may be expected to take one of several general forms.
In the first, the BOD removal is a function of the influent BOD concen-
tration, the detention time, the biological mass, temperature, and a
reaction rate constant which is a combination of constants defining cer-
tain aspects of the biokinetics of the system as well as the susceptibility
of the effluent being treated to these biokinetic processes. The second
form is where the BOD remaining is a function of the detention time (the
time of exposure), temperature, influent waste concentration and a reaction
rate constant. The establishment of the particular relationship can be
done through purely mathematical approaches or through certain graphical
relationships. The latter method was used during the mathematical model-
ing of the data in this project.
It has been shown (9) that the mathematical model for completely mixed
aerobic systems such as might be expected from the oxidation ditch process
or the aerated lagoon generally takes the following form:
S - S
-V-*-* tk
S v
e
Previous work on trickling filters indicates a retardant form as
follows (9):
15
-------
s
— = exp [-kAvt]
o
The terms in the above equations are defined as follows:
S is the influent BOD concentration to the treatment unit (mg/1).
S is the effluent BOD concentration from the treatment unit (mg/1).
k is the biological rate constant.
X is the volatile suspended solids under contact in the system and
is intended as an expression of the active biological mass (mg/1).
t is the detention time of the system (days).
A is the specific area of the filter media (sf/cf) .
The influent and effluent concentrations in the above equations are gen-
erally expressed by filtered BOD values. However, the data to be reported
here are based upon unfiltered but settled BOD values. It is anticipated
that the resultant models will reflect this difference.
T—20
The term 9 can be inserted in the above equations as the temperature
correction which must be applied to the reaction rate constant k, where:
6 is the temperature coefficient.
T is the temperature (°C) of the biological process.
The value of 0 then represents the rate at which the activity or biological
rate constant is expected to change with temperature. The magnitude of
this change will be dependent upon the type of system which exists. The
more dispersed the discrete biological particles are, the more susceptible
they can be expected to be to temperature variations because these tem-
perature variations will influence the particular organism and its
individual biokinetics. In the case of large flocculant particles, the
temperature influence along biokinetic lines is secondary and the control-
ling influence is that of the diffusion or transfer of oxygen into the
agglomerated floe particle. The large flocculant growth is less temperature
dependent than the dispersed growth.
Therefore, for a well flocculating system, a low 6 value might well be
expected. For a dispersed system which could occur with extremely low or
high food to microorganism (F/M) ratios, a reasonably large temperature
rate constant could be expected to result. The biological reaction rate
constant k may also be expected to change with feed type and composition
as shown by Tishler (18).
The various mathematical models and the constants associated with them
are presented in the following SECTIONS pertaining to the respective
16
-------
biological systems. In addition to presenting the mathematical formula
and the related constants, the observed effluent BOD concentrations and
overall treatment efficiencies will be compared to those which would be
predicted by the resultant models.
17
-------
I
-------
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PILOT TREATMENT PLANT
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Clarified Mill Effluent
M
o
Bleach Plant Effluent
Excess To Overflow-*-! 1.1 I-*- Excess To
"I1-* Overflow
L I -I
RETURN TO ANY SYSTEM
Recycle
n
TRICKLING
FILTERS
NO
Recycle
n
NO
Excess
Sludge
CLARIFIER
Discharge
-------
COMPLETED PROJECT PLANS FOR ALL SYSTEMS
(Mead-FHQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Alter-
nate
I.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
F-l
A
F-2
F-l
A
B-l
C-2
F-2
II.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
F-l
A
F-2
F-l
D-2
A
Feed
TRICKLING
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
TF2
PF
PF
PF
OD
TF2
TRICKLING
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
TF1
PF
PF
TF1
OD
PF
B, C. G PF
F-2,
III.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
E
E
A
B-l
B-2
A
IV.
A
A
A
A
A
E
E
D-2
C-2
C-3
C-3 PF
Black Teat
Liquor I.D.
Test
Duration
(weeks)
FILTER PILOT SYSTEM WITH
no TF1-1
\
TF1-2
TF1-3
TF1-4
TF1-5
TF1-6
TF1-7
TF1-8
TF1-9
TF1-10
TF1-11
TF1-12
TF1-13
TF1-14
TF1-15
f TF1-16
yes TF1-17
yes TF1-1S
7
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
4
3
3
3
3
7
6
10
9
8
FILTER PILOT SYSTEM WITH
no TF2-1
\
TF2-2
TF2-3
TF2-4
TF2-5
TF2-6
TF2-7
TF2-8
TF2-9
TF2-10
TF2-11
TF2-12
TF2-13
TF2-14
TF2-15
/ TF2-16
yes TF2-17
yes TF2-18
7
3
3
3
3
3
3
5
4
3
3
3
3
7
6
10
9
8
Deten.
Tine
(days)
Clarif. Recycle
SLODGE RECYCLE (TF1)
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
-
FILTRATE
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
_
-
-
yes 1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
0:1
0:1
1:1
0.5:1
0.5:1
1:1
. 1:1
V 1:1
Feed to Simp 1:1
yes 5:1
no 0:1
yes 0:1
yes 1:1
RECYCLE (TF2)
yes 1:1
yes 0:1
yes 0:1
Imhoff Cone 1:1
\
\
2:1
2:1
1:1
1:1
0.5:1
0.5:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
0:1
0:1
/ 0:1
1:1
Hydraulic
Loading
Rate
(gpd/sf)
4000
6000
8000
2000
4000
2660
1330
6000
6000
4000
4000
6000
4000
4000
8000
6000
3000
6000
4000
2000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
6000
6000
4000
4000
6000
4000
4000
6000
6000
6000
6000
Depth
or
Height
(ft.l
24
24
24
24
24
22
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
16
16
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
Dates
Beginning
6-10-68
7-29-68
8-19-68
9-9-68
10-7-68
10-28-68
11-18-68
2-3-69
3-10-69
4-14-69
5-5-69
5-26-69
6-16-69
7-14-69
9-1-69
10-13-69
1-5-70
3-9-70
6-10-68
7-29-68
8-19-68
9-9-68
10-7-68
10-28-68
11-18-68
2-3-69
3-10-69
4-14-69
5-5-69
5-26-69
6-16-69
7-14-69
9-1-69
10-13-69
1-5-70
3-9-70
Ending
7-28-68
8-18-68
9-8-68
10-6-68
10-27-68
11-17-68
12-6-68
3-9-69
4-6-69
5-4-69
5-25-69
6-15-69
7-3-69
8-31-69
10-12-69
12-19-69
3-8-70
5-1-70
7-28-68
8-18-68
9-8-68
10-6-68
10-27-68
11-17-68
12-6-68
3-9-69
4-6-69
5-4-69
5-25-69
6-15-69
7-3-69
8-31-69
10-12-69
12-19-69
3-8-70
5-1-70
AERATED LAGOON PILOT SYSTEM (AL)
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
OD
OD
PF
TF1
TF2
PF
no AL-1
y
AL-2
AL-3
AL-4
AL-5
AL-6
AL-7
AL-8
AL-9
/ AL-10
f AL-11
es AL-12
yes AL-13
7
6
6
7
8
3
3
5
9
6
10
9
8
2.3
1.5
3.0
2.3
3.8
3.0
2.3
1.4
1.7
3.5
1.7
1.8
7.0
no no
no
no
no
lahoff Cone
\
/ V
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
7.7
5.5
7.7
5.5
5.0
7.7
6-10-68
7-29-68
9-9-68
10-21-68
2-3-69
3-31-69
5-5-69
5-26-69
6-30-69
9-1-69
10-13-69
1-5-70
3-9-70
7-28-68
9-8-68
10-20-68
12-6-68
3-30-69
5-4-69
5-25-69
6-27-69
8-31-69
10-12-69
12-19-69
3-8-70
5-1-70
OXIDATION DITCH PILOT SYSTEM (OD)
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
TF2
TF1
no OD-1
\
OD-2
OD-3
OD-4
OD-5
OD-6
. OD-7
/ OD-8
yes OD-9
yes OD-10
6
6
6
8
5
6
9
6
9
8
3
2
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
no no
no no
yes yes
\
/ V
6.7
7.0
7.0
4.0
4.0
5.2
5.2
8.6
4.3
4.3
6-17-68
7-29-68
10-28-68
2-3-69
3-31-69
5-19-69
6-30-69
9-1-69
1-5-70
3-9-70
7-28-68
9-8-68
12-6-68
3-30-69
5-18-69
6-27-69
8-31-69
10-12-69
3-8-70
5-1-70
TABLE 3
-------
SECTION V
THE PILOT PLANT FEED SOURCE
Location
This project involved the study of biological treatment on particular
effluents from the integrated kraft pulping, bleaching, and papermaking
operation of The Mead Corporation in Chillicothe, Ohio. This Mead manu-
facturing facility consists of a 600-ton per day hardwood kraft pulp
mill with bleach plant and 15 papermachines with a total average pro-
duction of more than 900 tons per day of fine papers.
Raw Water Characteristics
The main water supply of the Chillicothe Division is wells. Some water
is also furnished by a well-point system and a surface water source.
Better than half of the raw water is passed through sand filters and
chlorinated. This filtered water goes to the turbine rooms and part is
used as process water. The rest of the raw water is softened with lime.
A portion is treated with alum and activated silica for certain paper-
making uses. The remainder is used in the bleach plant and the pulp mill.
The untreated water has the following average characteristics:
Total hardness
Calcium hardness
Total alkalinity (MO)
Iron concentration
367 mg/1 (as CaC03)
245 mg/1 (as CaC03)
258 mg/1 (as CaC03)
2.1 mg/1 (as Fe)
167 mg/1 (as CaCO )
The softened water has the following average characteristics:
Total hardness
Calcium hardness
Total alkalinity (MO)
Alkalinity (P)
Character of Pilot Plant Feed
64 mg/1 (as CaCO )
65 mg/1 (as CaCO )
27 mg/1 (as CaC03)
Process effluents from the Chillicothe Division are provided primary
clarification and then secondary treatment in an aerated lagoon.
The main pilot plant feed source was mill primary clarifier effluent
(called Pilot Feed or PF). During the course of the project, varying
quantities of bleach plant effluent were being added either to the full
21
-------
scale system by the Chillicothe Division or at the pilot site using a
special pump to maintain a definite ratio. This bleach plant effluent
comes from chlorine-caustic extract-hypochlorite-chlorine dioxide bleach-
ing stages which are generally abbreviated as the CEHD bleaching sequence.
Nutrients were added at the pilot site to maintain a level of 100:5:1
BOD to ammonia as nitrogen to phosphate as phosphorus. Variation of
nutrient concentrations in the mill clarifier effluent are presented in
SECTION VIII and summarized in TABLE 30 (page 105), also in that SECTION.
Four distinctly different Pilot Feeds can therefore be identified during
the course of the project as shown in TABLE 4 (page 15). These categories
will be identified by symbol in the later SECTIONS of this report.
The variation of physical and chemical characteristics is not detailed
here but rather will be shown for each test period on each pilot unit.
22
-------
IDENTIFICATION OF DIFFERENT-ftJLOT FEEDS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Symbol Duration
PF(1) 6-10-68
to
11-17-68
PF(2) 11-18-68
to
6-10-69
PF(3) 6-16-69
to
12-19-69
PF(BL) 1-5-70
to
5-1-70
Comments
Chillicothe Mill primary clarified
effluent with no bleach plant
effluent added.
Mill clarified effluent already mixed
with partial bleach plant effluent
in ratio of 5:1
Mill clarified effluent mixed at
pilot site with bleach plant effluent
in ratio of 4:1
Mill clarified effluent already mixed
with partial bleach plant effluent in
ratio of 4:1 plus supplemental addi-
tion of black liquor blowdown to
achieve higher BOD.
TABLE 4
-------
SECTION VI
TRICKLING FILTER TREATMENT
The Trickling Filter Process
The trickling filter is the most common method being employed today for
biological treatment of municipal wastewaters. For industrial waste-
waters, however, the situation is different. Only two such treatment
plants are operating in the kraft industry.
Biological filtration as occurs in a trickling filter is not a filtering
or straining process as the name may imply. Rather it is a technique for
promoting contact between the wastewater and an active growth of micro-
organisms which adhere to the filter media. The trickling filter is,
therefore, a fixed bed reactor for biological treatment as opposed to the
activated sludge process which constitutes a fluid bed reactor. More
complete descriptions of the process may be found in the literature
(5)(9)(12).
Many different types of media have been tried through the long history of
trickling filters, but crushed stone or rock is considered by many to be
the most acceptable material. However, within the last 10 to 15 years,
plastic media have received increasing attention because of its ability
to be constructed in tall columns and to be loaded at higher hydraulic
and organic rates, all of which results in less land area required for
treatment.
Standard-rate rock-media trickling filters are normally designed for load-
ings of 25 to 100 gallons per day per square foot of surface area (gpd/sf)
and 5 to 25 pounds of BOD per day per 1000 cubic feet of media volume
(ppd/1000 cf )(5). Trickling filters loaded at rates greater than the
standard rates would be termed high-rate trickling filters. If a filter
receives a BOD loading of over 100 ppd/1000 cf, then it is referred to as
a roughing filter. The acceptable design loading capabilities of
plastic-media trickling filters would place these filters in the high-
rate category.
High-rate plastic-media trickling filters are more applicable for use in
treatment of large volume industrial wastewaters than are conventional
rock-media trickling filters because of resulting space and equipment re-
quirements. This project was involved with operating two 24-foot pilot
trickling filter towers packed with PVC-type plastic media. What follows
is a summary of all results and an analysis of the high-rate trickling
filter as the main process for biological treatment of kraft mill efflu-
ents. The results of combination treatment studies involving the trick-
ling filters and either the oxidation ditch treatment process or the
aerated lagoon treatment process will be presented in SECTION VII of
this report.
-------
Project Results on Pilot Trickling Filter 1
Pilot Trickling Filter 1 (TF1) was unique in that the filter recycle was
sludge underflow from the cone-bottomed clarifier which followed TF1. A
mixing ring in the center of the clarifier was kept agitated, also by re-
turned sludge, as it was fed the filter effluent. Oxygen was transferred
to the wastewater in the trickling filter tower and remained as dissolved
oxygen (D.O.) when the filter effluent contacted the sludge in the mixing
ring. Although actual D.O. levels in this mixing ring averaged above
0.1 mg/1 for most test series, D.O. readings of zero were encountered on
occasion, which means aerobic biological activity would have been hin-
dered in this mixing ring.
Clarification was accomplished outside the mixing ring with the settled
sludge pumped from the cone bottom for recycle to the top of the filter
and to the mixing ring. The volatile solids content of this recycled
sludge varied from less than 0.1 percent to greater than 0.7 percent based
on average test results during tests TF1-8 through 18 of the project.
Earlier testing on this sludge was restricted to volumetric settleable
solids which were found to range up to 950 ml per liter per 30 minutes
(ml/1/30 minutes). A program of wasting of 50 to 100 gallons per day of
this sludge was initiated in test TF1-9 by necessity since the pump, cone
bottom, and distribution pan were all found to clog on occasion and inter-
rupt the treatment operation on TF1. (See TABLE 41 in the APPENDIX
(page 13l) for details of the sludge wasting program on TF1.)
TF1 was constructed with sludge recycle in an attempt to oxidize the ex-
cess sludge that occurs from filter sloughing and also to derive benefit,
if possible, from maintaining active sludge in contact with aerated
trickling filter effluent.
A total of 18 pilot tests were conducted on TF1 during the project. Of
these tests, 17 involved the cone-bottomed clarifier with sludge return
to the mixing ring and sludge recycle to the top of the filter. The re-
sults of these 17 tests will be considered together. The remaining test
(TF1-16) will be handled with Pilot Trickling Filter 2 results.
TF1 test conditions have been arrayed with respect to recycle ratio and
hydraulic loading rate. The edited test results on BOD efficiency of
all tests are shown in this format in TABLE 5 (page 28)• Detailed
explanation of this TABLE may be useful since the format is used again.
In TABLE 5, each test period occupies a single row and the tests are not
in numerical order because the results have been arrayed as stated above.
To aid in interpretation, the whole first row will be identified. The
test is shown as TF1-7 which means test period 7 on Trickling Filter 1.
The test conditions for TF1-7 were: 0:1 recycle to feed ratio, which
means no recycle to the top of the filter (1:1 recycle means equal amounts
of recycle and feed applied to the top of the filter); 1330 gallons per
day per square foot hydraulic loading including the recycle volume, if
any; 22 feet of media packed in Trickling Filter 2 for this test; system
26
-------
feed of PF(2) which was mill clarified effluent with partial bleach plant
effluent in actual ratio of 5:1 according to TABLE 4 (page 15); and the
organic loading rate counting only the influent BOD strength was 90
pounds of BOD per day per 1000 cubic feet of filter media volume. The
edited test results for these conditions in TF1-7 were: an average
temperature in TF1 effluent of 21°C; the BOD removal efficiency of this
unit in this test averaged 51.6 percent. (No overall removal is given
because TF1 was not fed from another of the pilot units. Note that in
Test TF1-17, an overall removal of 82.6 percent is given because the
system feed was OD(BL) which means the Oxidation Ditch during the black
liquor studies had already removed the great majority of total BOD , but
the OD followed by TF1-17 removed a total of 82.6 percent.) The last
column for TF1-7 shows the settled effluent from TF1 to still contain
105 mg/1 BOD after treatment. Similar or self-explanatory headings for
test results are used on subsequent TABLES which contain exactly the
same format for test conditions.
The change in wastewater solids content across TF1 is summarized for all
tests in TABLE 6 (page 29). Changes in apparent color, pH, ammonia-
nitrogen, and phosphate-phosphorus are summarized in TABLE 7 (page 30).
Individual test averages of all parameters for each test are included for
future reference in TABLES 42 through 59 in the APPENDIX (starting with
page 133).
TF1 test conditions were also arrayed with respect to organic loading
rate and selected parameters from the edited test results have been
plotted in FIGURES 3, 4, and 5 (pages 34, 35, and 36). (TF1 results are
identified by a 1 preceding the test number). These TABLES and FIGURES
are referenced in the following discussion.
BOD Removal Efficiency Across TF1
5
For the 9 tests in which the feed for TF1 was mill clarified effluent
(designated pilot feed or PF) and the recycle ratio was 1:1, the BOD5
removal efficiency tended to drop as organic loading increased. Temper-
ature and BOD strength of the influent appeared to influence the effi-
ciencies as seen in FIGURE 3.
Efficiencies at the 1:1 recycle ratio ranged from 42 percent (organic
loading of 250 ppd/1000 cf and hydraulic loading of 8000 gpd/sf) to
almost 80 percent (70 ppd/1000 cf and 2000 gpd/sf). Three other tests
resulted in efficiencies of 60 to 70 percent BOD5 removal.
The same general downward trend with increasing organic loading is
evident when the recycle to the top of the filter was zero. (See TF1
tests in FIGURE 4.) Sludge was still being recycled to the mixing ring
for agitation during these and all other tests except TF1-16. In the
three tests with zero recycle to the top, the BOD efficiencies ranged
from approximately 36 percent (590 ppd/1000 cf and 6000 gpd/sf) up to
about 51 percent (90 ppd/1000 cf and 1330 gpd/sf).
-------
FIGURE 5 shows results when the recycle rate on TF1 was 0.5:1 in two
tests and 5:1, the highest recycle run, in a third test. Removal
efficiencies showed a reverse trend at the 0.5:1 rates. The values were
37 percent (190 ppd/1000 cf and 4000 gpd/sf) and 48 percent (300 ppd/
1000 cf and 6000 gpd/sf). The 5:1 recycle ratio gave an average BOD
removal of 73 percent (90 ppd/1000 cf and 8000 gpd/sf).
All of these data have been mathematically modeled. The results will be
presented at the end of this SECTION.
Solids Removal Across TF1
TABLE 6 presents the average changes in solids across TF1 during the
various tests. Negative signs in this TABLE denote an increase rather than
a decrease in the particular form of solids through the treatment unit.
Total solids decreased in 13 of the 17 pilot tests shown for TF1. This
decrease was generally between 6 and 15 percent. Overall extremes were
58.8 percent increase to 43.2 percent decrease. Except for extremes, the
volatile total solids tended to decrease approximately twice as much as
the total solids. Actual concentrations can be compared in the APPENDIX
TABLES.
The suspended solids portion of the total solids decreased in 14 of the
17 pilot tests. The three increases were quite substantial and were
apparently associated with stabilized solids going over the clarifier
weir since the associated BOD level did not respond with similar in-
creases. The reduction of suspended solids was generally between 14 and
40 percent except for the extremes. The volatile fraction of the sus-
pended solids was seen to decrease at a slightly lesser extent than the
suspended solids.
Generally it appears that reductions in total and suspended solids do
occur across the TFl-clarifier system even though much biological and
inert sludge is being kept in the system for varying periods of time.
The upsets that do occur are infrequent but significant.
Apparent Color, pH, and Nutrient Changes Across TF1
The apparent color always decreased across TF1 as shown in TABLE 7.
"Apparent color" must be distinguished from "true color" which has had the
solids removed and the pH adjusted to 7.6 (see PROCEDURES). The decrease
in apparent color ranged from 3 percent to as high as 52 percent but was
most often between 20 and 30 percent. Treated effluent apparent color
levels were generally in the 1000 to 1700 unit range. When black liquor
was present, the levels doubled.
28
-------
The TF1 process appeared to cause pH changes which always brought the
effluent to an average level of 7.2 to 7.7 even when the average pH in
the feed varied from this range by as much as 0.9 pH units. The presence
of black liquor during the last two test periods meant the feed pH was
generally higher. The resultant effluent from TF1 was in the range of
pH 8.1 to 8.7.
TF1 was found to be a good consumer of ammonia nitrogen and phosphate
phosphorus in 13 of the pilot tests. The fate of the ammonia which was
frequently reduced by 50 percent or more is not accounted for in nitrifi-
cation since little if any increase in nitrates was noted over the pilot
feed source. Close to 30 percent of the influent phosphate was removed
during treatment by TF1. Its ultimate fate may have rested with the
solids which coated the trickling filter media. Other information on
nutrient levels is included in SECTION VIII of this report.
Project Results on Pilot Trickling Filter 2
Pilot Trickling Filter 2 (TF2) was of conventional design as the filter
recycle was trickling filter effluent before clarification. TF2 was
identical to TF1 except for a collection pan instead of the special
clarifier which was under TF1. A conventional design such as TF2 would
normally require a separate clarifier if the trickling filter was not to
be followed by any other treatment process.
Clarification was provided by using Clarifier 2 during the first 3 tests
on TF2. Later tests required that TF2 effluent be settled in the labora-
tory before BOD analysis for clarifier simulation since Clarifier 2 had
to be used in conjunction with the pilot oxidation ditch.
A total of 18 pilot tests were conducted on TF2 during the project. An
additional test from TF1 can be added to these results since the special
clarifier was eliminated in test TF1-16 and the two filters were run in a
similar manner for comparative purposes. The results of all 19 tests
will therefore be considered together.
TF2 test conditions (with test TF1-16 included) have been arrayed with
respect to recycle ratio and hydraulic loading rate. The edited test
results on BOD efficiency of these tests are shown within the arrayed
format in TABLE 8 (page 3l). The effect of settling is shown but will not
be plotted. The change in wastewater solids content across TF2 without
clarification is shown in TABLE 9.(page 32). Other changes also without
clarification are summarized in TABLE 10 (page 33). For reference, the
APPENDIX contains individual test averages of all parameters for each
test. (See TABLES 60 through 80, starting on page 151.)
TF2 test conditions were also arrayed with respect to organic loading
rate. Selected parameters from the edited test period have been plotted
in FIGURES 4, 5, and 6 (pages 35, 36, and 37). (TF2 results are identi-
fied by a 2 preceding the test number). These TABLES and FIGURES will be
referenced in the following discussion.
-------
BOD Removal Efficiency Across TF2
""" "3 ~ '"-•jr-~"1" - -- -"~• --••"•-- - "•—————
Unsettled effluent from TF2 is quite variable in its BOD content and, for
this reason, will not be discussed except to note that efficiency of re-
moval without clarification, the effect of settling on BOD removal (i.e.,
efficiency across a clarifier), and the resulting efficiency of removal
with simulated clarification are all shown in TABLE 8 for TF2. In many
cases, significant amounts of BOD were removed from TF2 effluent by
settling. The result in all cases was a more consistent quality in the
effluent and it is this settled value which will be discussed.
For the 7 tests in which the feed for TF2 was pilot feed (PF) and the
recycle rate was 1 to 1 for feed, the settled BOD removal efficiency
tended to drop with increased organic loading (see FIGURE 6). There are
two exceptions which can be partly explained by extra strength influent
in one case and higher hydraulic loading in the other case.
BOD efficiencies based on settled effluent at the 1:1 recycle rate ranged
from 42 percent (organic loading of 620 ppd/1000 cf and hydraulic loading
of 6000 gpd/sf) to 65 percent (125 ppd/1000 cf and 4000 gpd/sf). Black
liquor was being added in the former case.
The same general downward trend with increasing organic loading is also
found at zero recycle on TF2 as seen in FIGURE 4. For the tests iden-
tified with a "2", the efficiencies ranged from 36 percent (590 ppd/1000 cf
and 6000 gpd/sf) to 50 percent (150 ppd/1000 cf and 2000 gpd/sf) both
without black liquor. When black liquor was being added, only 13 percent
of the BOD5 was removed (1070 ppd/1000 cf and 6000 gpd/sf).
Recycle rates of 0.5:1 and 2:1 were also run on TF2. BOD efficiencies
of between 60 and 64 percent were obtained at the 2:1 rate while less
than 45 percent was removed at the 0.5:1 rate as shown in FIGURE 5.
The dependency of the efficiency on the loading parameters will be exam-
ined later in this SECTION when the mathematical models are presented.
Solids Removal Across TF2
All determinations of solids content in TF2 effluent were made without
benefit of clarification on the mixed effluent. The changes in solids
across TF2 will be on this basis. TABLE 9 presents the average changes
for total solids, volatile total solids, suspended solids, and volatile
suspended solids. Negative values in this TABLE indicate an increase
rather than a decrease of the particular form of solids.
Total solids were found to decrease slightly (2.1 to 11.8 percent) on
the average in 11 of 19 test periods. Slight increases were noted several
times and increases greater than 50 percent were observed twice when
suspended solids losses were also significant. The volatile total solids
follow the total solids trend except the increase is at a greater level
in almost all cases.
30
-------
Large variabilities in the suspended solids forms would be expected since
the effluent was unsettled. This variability for suspended solids ranges
from a decrease of 62 percent in one test average to an increase of
168 percent apparently when the filter was sloughing. The volatile
suspended solids also show much variability for the same reason. Any
full scale trickling filter treatment plant should be designed with a
clarifier between the trickling filter and the river.
Apparent Color. pH. and Nutrient Changes Across TF2
Apparent color generally decreased across TF2 as shown in TABLE 10.
Four exceptions are noted and two of them correspond to feeds other than
PF. The treated effluent apparent color level generally ranged from
1000 to 1800 color units except when black liquor was present and the
level jumped to 3800 to 4600 units.
The pH level was consistently brought by the biological filter to an
average range of 7.2 to 7.6 except when black liquor was present and the
level jumped to an average range of 8.4 to 8.6.
Nutrient levels decreased significantly in all but five test periods.
There is incomplete correlation between decreases in ammonia and decreases
in phosphate. Other nutrient information will be given in SECTION VIII.
Dissolved Oxygen Levels in TF1 and TF2
Based on the individual test period averages in the APPENDIX, it can be
seen that the treated effluent from TF2 always carried a dissolved oxygen
level of above 2.4 mg/1 and usually greater than 5 mg/1. It is signifi-
cant that such a high level remained even after the requirements were
satisfied for the aerobic fixed bed biological process.
This aeration capacity of the trickling filter tower was the motivation
for the sludge recycle on TF1. The excess oxygen was utilized in TF1 as
evidenced by the average D.O. levels in the mixing ring being generally
below 1.0 mg/1 and often less than 0.6 mg/1.
Temperature Changes Across TF1 and TF2
The average data show temperature drops of 4° to 14°C across TF1 when PF
was feed (see APPENDIX). Across TF2, which did not have a clarifier as
did TF1, the average temperature dropped 3° to 10°C. When a filter was
preceded by the other filter or by the OD, the decrease was found to
range from only 1° to 4°C. The temperature decrease would certainly be
a function of ambient temperature and recycle rate.
Mathematical Models of Trickling Filter Results
Mathematical models have been presented by many investigators to express
the overall performance of trickling filters. These models generally take
the form of a retardant type equation of the following form:
31
-------
where
S is BOD concentration of filter effluent (mg/1)
S is BOD concentration of filter influent including dilution
effect of any recycle (mg/1)
k is biological rate constant
A is specific surface of particular media (sf/cf)
t is expression of exposure time in filter and is a function
of filter depth (D) , specific surface (A ) , and
hydraulic loading (Q) .
The biological rate constant k is dependent upon temperature as follows:
Generally t is expressed as :
t = AvD/Qn
The specific surface term (A ) may be included in an overall biological
rate constant, K, for the specific media and system, where:
K = kA
v
Eckenfelder (9) (10) has shown that the trickling filter model can be
expected to take the following form:
- exp [-K0T-2°D/Qn]
As the slime on the filter media represents a uniplanar surface through
which the oxygen must diffuse, it was assumed for the basis of the model-
ing that 6 would be 1.035 since this value has been reported previously
for trickling filter media. Thus, the overall biological rate constant
K and the hydraulic exponent n must be determined from the experimental
results.
The hydraulic exponent n was determined from data obtained during flow
tracer studies which are presented and discussed in SECTION VIII of this
report. The results of these studies are shown in FIGURE 7 (page 38),
with n determined to be 1.2 from the data. There are several points for
TF1 which fall off the curve in FIGURE 7. TF1 discharged directly to the
Clarifier 1 and it was difficult to obtain representative samples in the
32
-------
dye tests at the 24 foot depth. These points were disregarded in the
n determination. However, overall configuration of the filters and the
filter media was identical, so the n value should be identical for the
two units. The n value as determined by this analysis is used in
subsequent modeling of both trickling filters.
TF1 relations for the anticipated mathematical model were computed and
plotted in FIGURE 8 (page 39), from which the slope of the line would be
representative of the biological reaction rate K. Each of the four points
shown in this FIGURE represent an average of the respective functions
of all the test data which were obtained for that given recirculation
rate. These four points therefore represent the edited data which were
accrued over a two-year period of operation of the respective filter.
As can be seen, the reaction rate K for TF1 is 0.063. The effluent con-
centration to be expected, based upon the development of this model, is
presented in mathematical form in FIGURE 8. The base equation is:
S = S exp[-0.063(1.035)T~2°D/Qn]
and may be applied directly only when no recirculation flow is applied to
the filter as S is the BOD concentration of the effluent actually
contacting the filter media. Where recirculation is employed, as more
often occurs, then:
S + NS
o 1 + N
where
S = BOD of filter influent (mg/1)
3.
S = BOD of filter effluent (mg/1)
N = Percent recirculation divided by 100
Substituting into the base equation:
Sa + NSe T-20 1 2
Se = 1 + N expt-0.063(1.035) D/Q ]
For the purpose of simplification let:
expt-0.063(1.035)T~2°D/Q1'2] = F
then
S F + NS F
S
1 + N
-------
The grouping of terms yields:
S (1 + N)-NF = S F
e a
which may be expressed in the simplified form as:
S F
S = a
e (1+N-NF)
FIGURE 9 (page 40) presents similar information for TF2 with each point
representing a composite of the data accrued over the entire test period
for that respective recirculation rate. As can be seen from this FIGURE,
the reaction rate K for TF2 was found to be 0.057. The mathematical
expression defining the effluent concentration to be expected from this
filter is also shown on FIGURE 9.
The effluent BOD concentration to be expected from TF2 would be expressed
as follows:
For no recirculation
T-70 1 2
S = S exp[-0.057(1.035) D/Q ' ]
with recirculation
S F
S
e (1+N-NF)
Where
S = BOD of incoming wastewater
3.
S = BOD of influent mixture to filter
o
S = BOD of filter effluent
e
N = Percent recirculation divided by 100
T-?0 1 ?
F = exp[-0.057(1.035) D/Q ' ]
A comparison of TF1 and TF2 is presented on FIGURE 10 (page 41) . The
recycle to TF1 was clarifier underflow while TF2 had the more conventional
filter effluent for recycle. As can be seen, the reaction rate for TF2
is less than that for TF1. The magnitude of this difference is not great,
but the indication is consistent and represents a valid indication of the
relationship between the two basic systems. Thus, with all other condi-
tions constant, the recirculation of sludge would result in a slightly
higher degree of removal or a lower effluent concentration than with the
recirculation of unsettled effluent as is conventionally done.
-------
TABLE 11 (page 42) compares the observed effluent BOD concentrations and
removal efficiencies for TF1 to those levels which would be predicted by
the mathematical model presented above. Similar information is presented
for TF2 in TABLE 12 (page 43). In general the predicted efficiencies and
effluent BOD concentrations are well within 20 percent of those values
actually obtained. In a few cases there is no apparent agreement between
the observed values and those predicted. In these cases the feed was
either modified by black liquor additions or had been biologically
treated ahead of the trickling filters.
The biological reaction rate can be influenced by the character of the
wastewater. Therefore, the model should be negated when the feed is not
PF for which the model was developed. On this basis, the models do fit
the data within an acceptable tolerance.
35
-------
w
Ln
SUMMARY OF BOD5 RESULTS ON TRICKLING FILTER WITH SLUDGE RECYCLE
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TEST CONDITIONS
o
Test
Recycle
to Feed
Ratio
TRICKLING FILTER
TF1-7
TF1-6
TF1-17
TF1-10
TF1-9
TF1-4
TF1-1
TF1-5
TF1-11
TF1-14
TF1-13
TF1-2
TF1-8
TF1-12
TF1-18
TF1-3
TF1-15
0:1
0:1
0:1
0.5:1
0.5:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
5:1
Hydraulic
Loading
fgpd/sf i
TESTS WITH
1330
2660
3000
4000
6000
2000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
6000
6000
6000
6000
8000
8000
Height
(feet')
SLUDGE
22
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
System
Feed
RECYCLE
PF(2)
PF(1)
OD(BL)
PF(2)
PF(2)
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(3)
TF2(3)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(2)
TF2(BL)
PF(1)
PF(3)
Organic
Loading
(ppd/1000 cf1)
90
180
90
190
300
70
140
125
140
140
110
230
280
200
420
250
90
EDITED TEST RESULTS
% BOD5 Reduction
Temp. Unit
(°C) Settled Overall
21
22
12
27
26
25
31
31
26
32
32
33
22
33
30
35
29
51.6
48.1
5.7
37.4
47.9
79.5
67.5
60.0
68.6
50.6
48.7
46.3
48.1
47.8
34.6
42.1
72.8
82.6
63.8
56.9
Settled
Effluent
BOD5(mg/l)
105
112
98
133
108
43
73
80
62
99
87
111
153
101
273
110
46
-------
SUMMARY OF SOLIDS RESULTS ON TRICKLING FILTER WITH SLUDGE RECYCLE
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TEST CONDITIONS
EDITED TEST RESULTS
Test
Recycle Hydraulic
to Feed Loading Height System
Ratio (gpd/sf) (feet) Feed
Organic
Loading
(ppd/1000 cf)
% Solids Reduction
Total
Volatile
Total
Suspended
TRICKLING FILTER TESTS WITH SLUDGE RECYCLE
Volatile
Suspended
TF1-7
TF1-6
TF1-17
TF1-10
TF1-9
TF1-4
TF1-1
TF1-5
TF1-11
TF1-14
TF1-13
TF1-2
TF1-8
TF1-12
TF1-18
TF1-3
TF1-15
0:1
0:1
0:1
0.5:1
0.5:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
5 :1
1330
2660
3000
4000
6000
2000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
6000
6000
6000
6000
8000
8000
22
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
PF(2)
PF(1)
OD(BL)
FF(2)
PF(2)
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(3)
TF2(3)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(2)
TF2(BL)
PF(1)
PF(3)
90
180
90
190
300
70
140
125
140
140
110
230
280
200
420
250
90
-58-8
26.6
3.3
0.3
-10.3
24.8
- 1.5
14.2
15.8
6.4
43.2
13.5
18.3
8.9
6.8
8-5
6.7
-99-7
29.6
3.3
7.8
21.7
38.8
-10.8
22.7
27.6
17.8
27.5
18.2
33.3
19.5
12.3
12.7
15.5
25-9
39.4
38.4
-105.4
34.9
73.5
-21.3
24.5
33.4
-128.3
50.3
14.9
36.9
28.4
14.2
27.6
23.6
14.8
28.7
22.4
-84.2
34.1
57.8
32.2
19.5
24.4
-99.8
60.1
2.4
29.1
5.0
11.7
-10.7
- 2.5
H
-------
B
r
w
SUMMARY OF COLOR, pH, AND NUTRIENT RESULTS ON TRICKLING FILTER WITH SLUDGE RECYCLE
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
EDITED TEST RESULTS
0»
TRICKLING FILTER TESTS WITH SLUDGE RECYCLE
TF1-7
TF1-6
TF1-17
TF1-10
TF1-9
TF1-4
TF1-1
TF1-5
TF1-11
TF1-14
TF1-13
TF1-2
TF1-8
TF1-12
TF1-18
TF1-3
TF1-15
0:1
0:1
0:1
0.5:1
0.5:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
5:1
1330
2660
3000
4000
6000
2000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
6000
6000
6000
6000
8000
8000
22
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
PF(2)
PF(1)
OD(BL)
PF(2)
PF(2)
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(D
PF(2)
PF(3)
TF2(3)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(2)
TF2(BL)
PF(1)
PF(3)
90
180
90
190
300
70
140
125
140
140
110
230
280
200
420
250
90
% Reduction
Apparent
Color
17.8
25.6
13-3
7.1
12.5
51.6
25.5
38.5
37.0
23.0
22.3
27.5
22.0
6.9
3.0
22.2
3.0
pH
7.1
11.2
- 4.4
5.7
5.3
7.0
2,6
4.0
- 1.0
3.5
1.0
7.4
2.8
- 3.3
3.9
11.1
6.5
NH -N
27.5
50.5
-270.7
56.2
49.8
46.7
64.7
0.1
35.1
77.0
-12.5
50.0
-
57.9
66.6
0.0
73.6
PO.-P
4
30.6
30.3
-22.2
29.9
50.9
33.2
28.5
-25,2
36.9
2.0
-36.6
19.2
-
0.7
28.2
46.7
25.1
-------
SUMMARY OF BOD RESULTS ON TRICKLING FILTER WITH FILTRATE RECYCLE
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
vO
TEST CONDITIONS , -
Recycle
to Feed
Test Ratio
TRICKLING
TF2-2
TF2-3
TF1-16
TF2-16
TF2-17
TF2-15
TF2-10 0.
TF2-9 0.
TF2-4
TF2-1
TF2-7
TF2-13
TF2-11
TF2-14
TF2-8
TF2-12
TF2-18
TF2-5
TF2-6
FILTER
0:1
0:1
0:1
0:1
0:1
0:1
5:1
5:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
2:1
2:1
Hydraulic
Loading
(gpd/sf )
TESTS WITH
2000
4000
6000
6000
6000
6000
4000
6000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
6000
6000
6000
4000
4000
Height
(feet)
FILTRATE
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
16
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
16
24
System
Feed
RECYCLE
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(3)
PF(3)
PF(BL)
OD(3)
PF(2)
PF(2)
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(3)
TF1(2)
TF1(3)
PF(2)
PF(2)
PF(BL)
PF(1)
PF(1)
Organic
Loading
(ppd/1000 cf)
150
250
590
590
1070
40
190
300
270
140
125
160
55
70
280
195
620
125
80
DITED TEST
RESULTS
% BODr Efficiency
Temp.
(°C)
32
33
28
28
24
25
29
28
33
35
25
35
25
28
26
33
31
33
26
Unit
Mixed
25.0
26-0
30.9
16.1
7.6
negative
31.1
17.6
40.2
53.3
29.1
29.4
negative
negative
39.5
31.5
34.2
41.1
32.7
Effect of
Settling
32.8
15-0
8.0
25.8
5.8
34.4
17.2
22.8
28.6
22.3
51.2
16.9
73.1
41.5
21.1
26.2
12.1
37.3
41.3
Unit
Settled
49.6
37.2
36.4
37.7
13.0
11.8
43.0
36.4
57.3
63.7
65.4
41.4
6.7
69.1
52.3
49.5
42.1
63.1
60.5
Settled
Over- Effluent
all BOD_(mR/l)
97
122
185
181
462
90.4 16
121
132
89
81
79
141
70.7 58
84.7 31
140
98
366
74
85
r1
w
oo
-------
SUMMARY 0V SOLIDS RESULTS ON TRICKLING FILTER WITH FILTRATE RECYCLE
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TEST CONDITIONS
EDITED TEST RESULTS
Test
Recycle
to Feed
Ratio
TRICKLING FILTER
TF2-2
TF2-3
TF1-16
TF2-16
TF2-17
TF2-15
TF2-10
TF2-9
TF2-4
TF2-1
TF2-7
TF2-13
TF2-11
TF2-14
TF2-8
TF2-12
TF2-18
TF2-5
TF2-6
0:1
0:1
0:1
0:1
0:1
0:1
0.5:1
0.5:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
2:1
2:1
Hydraulic
Loarl i ng
(gpd/sf)
TESTS WITH
2000
4000
6000
6000
6000
6000
4000
6000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
6000
6000
6000
4000
4000
Height
(feet)
FILTRATE
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
16
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
16
24
System
Feed
RECYCLE
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(3)
PF(3)
PF(BL)
OD(3)
PF(2)
PF(2)
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(3)
TF1(2)
TF1(3)
PF(2)
PF(2)
PF(BL)
PF(1)
PF(1)
Organic
Loading
(ppd/1000 cf)
150
250
590
590
1070
40
190
300
270
140
125
160
55
70
280
195
620
125
80
% Solids Reduction
Volatile Volatile
Total Total Suspended Suspended
3.4
4.3
5.3
- 8.0
- 1.1
- 5.7
4.8
11.8
9.8
- 8.6
-53.1
-51.8
- 7.8
- 0.5
8.1
5.8
2.7
2.8
2.1
14.3
11.3
6.4
-14.7
- 0.9
0.1
10.2
13.3
17.5
- 4.5
-44.2
- 2.8
- 9.6
6.3
6.7
13.8
9.3
8.6
11.4
-12.1
6.8
7.2
-167.8
5.2
-32.5
17.5
23.1
21.3
-24.2
-97.1
-10.5
-27.1
62.4
10.8
13.4
-17.4
5.4
- 4.6
-27.1
-37.6
6.2
-68.5
1.8
16.0
14.0
25.2
0.1
-34.3
-109.3
-28.0
-27.4
59.4
- 3.5
- 4.3
-23.3
- 3.2
-20.9
-------
SUMMARY OF COLOR, pH AND NUTRIENT RESULTS ON TRICKLING FILTER WITH FILTRATE RECYCLE
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TEST CONDITIONS
EDITED TEST RESULTS
Test
Recycle
to Feed
Ratio
Hydraulic
Loading Height
r8Pd/sf) (feet)
System
Feed
Organic
Loading
(ppd/1000 cf)
% Reduction
Apparent
Color
pH
NH_-N PO,-P
TRICKLING FILTER TESTS WITH FILTRATE RECYCLE
H
TF2-2
TF2-3
TF1-16
TF2-16
TF2-17
TF2-15
TF2-10
TF2-9
TF2-4
TF2-1
TF2-7
TF2-13
TF2-11
TF2-14
TF2-8
TF2-12
TF2-18
TF2-5
TF2-6
0:1
0:1
0:1
0:1
0:1
0:1
0.5:1
0.5:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
2:1
2:1
2000
4000
6000
6000
6000
6000
4000
6000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
6000
6000
6000
4000
4000
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
16
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
16
24
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(3)
PF(3)
PF(BL)
OD(3)
PF(2)
PF(2)
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(3)
TF1(2)
TF1(3)
PF(2)
PF(2)
PF(BL)
PF(1)
PF(1)
150
250
590
590
1070
40
190
300
270
140
125
160
55
70
280
195
620
125
80
25.3
21.5
4.1
2.0
2.7
21.8
12.1
9.7
29.0
31.0
4.0
7.9
3.2
13.7
13.7
15.7
18.2
26.5
20.3
6.0
11.8
- 0.7
- 2.2
1.5
- 1.5
4.7
6.0
8.8
5.2
1.8
- 2.7
- 1.4
- 0.4
0.6
- 6.7
7.6
5.6
10.4
66.1
58.3
45.4
- 3.1
- 4.3
-25.0
34.8
40.0
50.4
62.4
22.3
12.0
46.7
-100.0
61.9
23.7
-34.4
29.4
44.6
50-0
48.8
45.9
-35.4
8.8
-33.3
21.6
29.7
20.9
31.3
3.2
37.9
-15.6
- 4.2
14.0
17.5
11.7
-36.7
14.3
r1
M
-------
TRICKLING FILTER 1 WITH l:l RECYCLE
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TFI - Test:
Feed:
Organic
Loading
(ppd/IOOO
cf) IOO
Hydraulic 600C
Loading 400C
(gpd/sf) 2000
Clarified Effluent
FIGURE 3
-------
PILOT TRICKLING FILTERS WITH "O" RECYCLE
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TF-Test:
Feed:
BOD5
(mg/l)
500
400
300
200
100
2-16 2-17
PF(3) PF(BL)
500
Orgonic
Loading
(ppd/IOOOcf)
Hydraulic
Loading
(gpd/sf)
J:
Influent ^^^"^ / \
—^*^-^x\
—.—-H-
Clarified Effluent
-.
FIGURE 4
-------
TRICKLING FILTERS AT OTHER RECYCLE RATES
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TF- Test:
Feed:
1-10
PF(2)
2-10
PF(2)
1-9
PF(2)
2-9
PF(2)
2-6
PF(I)
2-5
PF(I)
1-15
PF(3)
Recycle Rate:
0.5 : I Recycle-' Feed
Organic
Loading
(ppd/IOOO cf)
500
300
100
16 ft
Hydraulic
Loading
(gpd/sf)
6000
4000
2000
Temp
35
30
25
BOD5
(mg/l)
BOD5
Removal
400
300
200
100
Influent
Effluent
70
60
50
40
30
20
FIGURE 5
-------
TRICKLING FILTER 2 WITH 1:1 RECYCLE
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TF2 - Test:
Feed:
Organic
Loading
(ppd/IOOOcf)
Hydraulic
Loading
(gpd/sf)
45
FIGURE 6
-------
2
2
9
E
i=
a>
o
i
DETERMINATION OF "n" FROM DYE STUDIES ON FILTERS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
0.05
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
Legend
• TFI
• TF2
3000 5OOO
Hydraulic Loading (gpd/sf)
7000
FIGURE 7
46
-------
MODEL FOR TRICKLING FILTER 1
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
In
.035
T-20
0.0
- I.O
Recirculotion Ratio
Se =S0exp [-0.063(1.035)T D/Q Z]
8
10
12
Tl
M
O
1
oo
1.2
-------
I
MODEL FOR TRICKLING FILTER 2
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
In
1.035
T-20
0.0
Slope * -0.057
Reclrculotion Ratio
• 0 : I
A 0.5 : I
• I ; I
* 2:1
-1.0
s, s so exP [-0.057(I.035)T~20D/QL2]
0
8
10
12
1.2
-------
TRICKLING FILTER RESPONSE TO SLUDGE RECIRCULATION
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
0.0
TF2
In
1.035
T-20
No Sludge Return
K = 0.057
-1.0
With Sludge Return
K= 0.063
8
10
12
0
J.2
-------
COMPARISON OF OBSERVED EFFICIENCIES AND TF1 MODEL
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
BOD of Effluent(mg/l) Treatment Efficiency(%)
Test
TF1-1
TF1-2
TF1-3
TF1-4
TF1-5
TF1-6
TF1-7
TF1-8
TF1-9
TF1-10
TF1-11
TF1-12
TF1-13
TF1-14
TF1-15
TF1-16
TF1-17
TF1-18
Feed
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
TF2
PF
PF
PF
OD(BL)
TF2(BL)
Observed
73
111
110
43
80
112
105
153
108
133
62
101
87
99
46
185
98
273
Predicted
79
100
108
26
71
106
48
175
130
99
80
94
48
69
60
203
65
189
Observed
67.5
46.3
42.1
79.5
60.0
48.1
51.6
48.1
47.9
37.4
68.6
47.8
38.3(48.7)*
50.6
72.8
36.4
5.7
25.4(34.6)*
Predicted
64.5
51.5
43.4
87.7
64.5
50.8
77.5
40.4
37.4
53.2
59.1
51.5
65.6
65.6
64.4
30.1
37.9
48.4
*Efficiency based on unsettled TF2 feed.
50
TABLE 11
-------
COMPARISON OF OBSERVED EFFICIENCIES AND TF2 MODEL
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
BODr of Effluent(mg/l) Treatment Efficiency(%)
Observed Predicted
63.7 65.7
49.6 82.6
37.2 46.6
57.3 50.9
63.1 60.9
60.5 65.6
65.4 54.9
52.3 41.4
36.4 36.5
43.0 52.1
6.7 56.0
49.5 48.5
41.4 65.7
69.1 58.1
11.8 25.4
37.7 27.7
13.0 25.4
42.1 46.4
Test
TF2-1
TF2-2
TF2-3
TF2-4
TF2-5
TF2-6
TF2-7
TF2-8
TF2-9
TF2-10
TF2-11
TF2-12
TF2-13
TF2-14
TF2-15
TF2-16
TF2-17
TF2-18
Feed
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
PF
TF1
PF
PF
TF1
OD
PF
PF(BL)
PF(BL)
Observed
81
97
122
89
74
85
79
140
132
121
58
98
141
31
16
181
462
366
Predicted
76
33
104
103
78
74
111
173
131
101
27
100
82
41
13
210
396
339
51 TABLE 12
-------
SECTION VII
AERATED LAGOON TREATMENT
The Aerated Lagoon Process
The aerated lagoon is a basin in which oxygenation is provided by mechan-
ical or diffused aeration units or mechanical surface aeration. The
turbulence level maintained in the basin is a function of the power input
to the aerator and should be sufficient to insure distribution of oxygen
throughout the lagoon contents. Such power requirements are generally
much less than those necessary to maintain all the suspended solids in
suspension. Without sludge recycle, biological activity proceeds at a
much lower rate than in true activated sludge, thereby requiring detention
times measured in days rather than hours.
The process requires minimum control and has been often used where the
necessary land is available. Seventeen kraft mills in the U.S. are
operating aerated lagoons. More complete descriptions of the process can
be found in the literature (9)(12).
Project Results on Pilot Aerated Lagoon
A total of 13 test periods were completed on the pilot Aerated Lagoon (AL)
during the project. An additional two test periods on the pilot Oxidation
Ditch (OD) were conducted without sludge return. These two tests also
represent the aerated lagoon process (with a different type of aerator)
and so will be included in the analysis in this SECTION.
Laboratory settling of AL effluent was found to have a great effect on
BOD levels and so this sample modification was added with test AL-5.
The data prior to this test period were produced on an effluent sample
from AL without benefit of settling. Such a sample is termed "mixed" in
this report to distinguish from "settled" which infers the effluent from
clarification in the field or the supernatant from settling in the lab-
oratory in an Imhoff Cone. Beginning with test AL-5, all AL samples were
analyzed both mixed and settled for BOD . All determinations other than
BOD were on "mixed" effluent only.
TABLES 81 through 93 in the APPENDIX (starting with page 172) contain
averages of all test parameters on AL for each of the 13 test periods.
Both feed and effluent characteristics are shown. TABLES 13 through 15
(pages 50 through 52) show the test conditions on AL arrayed with
respect to detention time and contain the average change through treat-
ment of selected parameters. The format is similar to that explained
in SECTION IV.
-------
FIGURES 11 (page 53) and 12 (page 54) show the BOD results when the test
periods are arrayed with respect to average temperature in the lagoon.
These TABLES and FIGURES will be referenced in the following discussion.
BODC Removals Across Pilot Aerated Lagoon
- 3 .— .•
Without clarification as shown in FIGURE 11, the BOD removal increased
with increasing temperatures from a low of 34.7 percent (16°C and 2.3
days detention) to a high of 69.7 percent (30° and 2.3 days). The pilot
Oxidation Ditch without clarification and sludge return was run concur-
rently with two of the AL tests. The detention times were longer in the
OD and the temperatures were 1°C higher but efficiencies were lower (i.e.,
57.3 percent vs. 60.3 percent and 67.0 percent vs. 69.7 percent in AL).
These differences in efficiency are slight and are not considered to be
significant.
When AL effluent was settled, as shown in FIGURE 12, the trend of in-
creased BOD removal with increasing temperatures was no longer evident.
Without settling, the removals were quite erratic. The efficiencies based
on settled effluent when PF without black liquor was the feed show a con-
sistency between 80.6 and 82.3 percent removal (except for test AL-7) at
temperatures ranging from an average of 14°C to 23°C and detention times
from 1.7 to 3.8 days. This unit and these results constituted very con-
sistent operation. A mathematical model of these results is presented
later in this SECTION.
It should be noted that a clarifier on the end of the pilot Aerated
Lagoon would have removed an additional 10.6 percent to 74.0 percent of
the BOD,, in the treated effluent. This effect of settling (see FIGURE 12)
appeared to be an inverse function of detention time, although exceptions
can be noted. The very significant reduction at short detention times
due to external settling should be considered in future designs.
Solids Removals Across Pilot Aerated Lagoon
Solids would not be expected to be removed consistently with short
detention time aerated lagoon treatment unless clarification is provided.
The fate of influent organic dissolved solids would be conversion to
biomass. This biomass plus suspended solids in the lagoon influent can
either settle out in the lagoon or be kept suspended (function of power
input) and thus overflow with the effluent. Settled solids in the bottom
can decompose and might add to the dissolved solids of the basin contents.
TABLE 14 shows that most forms of solids increased on the average across
AL during many of the edited test periods. These increases were inter-
spersed with significant removals in several tests. The overall pattern
is not clearly defined, especially when considering only data from the
edited test period which was chosen to represent equilibrium of BOD
efficiency. Clarification of effluent from a short detention time
aerated lagoon would be expected to result in reduced solids and to pro-
duce a more consistent effluent quality than can be reported here.
54
-------
Apparent Color, pH, and Nutrient Changes Across Pilot Aerated Lagoon
Average changes in apparent color, pH, and both added nutrient forms
across AL have been tabulated for the edited test periods and are,shown
in TABLE 15.
Reductions in apparent color did result in all but 3 tests and were above
10 percent in 9 cases. Note the distinction between "apparent color" as
is reported here and "true color" which is the solution color after the
solids have been removed and pH adjusted to 7.6 (see PROCEDURES).
Resulting apparent color values in the treated effluent when PF without
black liquor was the feed source were found to range from 1000 to 1750
with a single exception. The addition of black liquor raised the value
to 3400.
The pH changes through AL when PF without black liquor was feed always re-
sulted in final levels of 7.3 to 7.7 on the average for each test period.
The effluent pH value was higher both when AL followed OD and in the final
test with its long detention time which caused a drop in pH of 1.2 units
to a treated effluent pH value of 7.8.
Ammonia nitrogen levels decreased significantly through AL in all but one
test (a combination test with TF1) and in the final test when black liquor
was being added as seen in TABLE 15. Phosphate phosphorus changes were
not so well defined, probably because of the variable solids content in
the AL effluent.
Dissolved Oxygen Levels in Pilot Aerated Lagoon
Review of the average results for each test period on AL as contained in
the individual summaries in the APPENDIX will show that the dissolved
oxygen level being maintained in AL was significantly greater than 0.5
mg/1 in all but the last test period when black liquor was present.
Therefore, it is reasoned that dissolved oxygen was not limiting to the
biological process except in the last test. In that test the BOD^ removal
efficiency was the highest of any test and so the limitation, if actual,
is not apparent.
Change in Temperature Across Pilot Aerated Lagoon
On the average, as shown in the test period results for AL in the APPEN-
DIX, the temperature decreased during treatment by 7 to 17 °C when PF was
feed. The decrease was only 4°C when AL followed OD in series. The low-
est resulting temperature in the lagoon basin was 11°C. The temperature
change is a function of ambient temperature, basin volume, exposed
surface area and detention time.
55
-------
Mathematical Model of Aerated Lagoon Results
The mathematical model for a completely mixed aerobic system shows de-
pendency upon the influent and effluent concentrations, the biological
solids under aeration, temperature, detention time, and a reaction rate
constant which would be a function of both the makeup and character of
the wastewater being treated, as well as the biological system in which
the wastewater is subjected for treatment. Analysis of the aerated
lagoon data with respect to these various parameters indicated a best
fit by the mathematical form represented in FIGURE 13 (page 55). The
respective points which are shown represent the function of the average
of the data obtained during each particular test period. The range
marks radiating from the respective points indicate the data from the
individual weeks in each test average.
The mixed liquor volatile suspended solids were found to have little in-
fluence upon the mathematical model for the system. A major reason could
be the extremely Iqw solids content of the system, which would undoubtedly
be reflected to some extent in the biological rate constant k which was
established for this system. A reaction rate constant of 1.424 and a
temperature coefficient of 1.023 was established for the aerated lagoon
system. The average F/M ratio of the 5 points represented by the plot is
0.4. The line of best fit shown in FIGURE 13 was established by the
method of least squares.
The relationship is:
S " S- = 1.424(1.023)T"2°t
S
e
Where
S = BOD of influent (mg/1)
S = BOD of effluent (mg/1)
t = Detention time (days)
T = Temperature (°C)
This relationship may be modified as follows to express the effluent BOD
to be expected from the unit directly.
Since the above equation can be expressed
g
-^ -1 = 1.424(1.023)T"2°t
O
e
-------
then
S
~ = 1+1.424(1.023)T~2°t
O
e
or
S
e
c T—90
o 1+1.424(1.023) t
hence
S
S =
e 1+1.424(1.023)T 2°t
A comparison of the observed effluent BOD concentrations and efficiencies
with those which would be predicted by this model are presented in TABLE
16 (page 56). These comparisons indicate relatively close agreement
between those values observed and those values predicted except in the
cases where the feed had received biological treatment prior to the
aerated lagoon or where the feed had been supplemented with black liquor.
In both cases the quality of the wastewater had been modified. There-
fore, the biological rate constant would be affected. It is interesting
to note, however, that in a case where the feed had been supplemented
with black liquor and subjected to trickling filtration prior to the
aerated lagoon (test AL-12), the lagoon performed as would be predicted
for the unsupplemented primary feed when fed directly to the aerated
lagoon.
57
-------
M
H
LO
SUMMARY OF AERATED LAGOON BOD RESULTS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
0)
T f . q t
-i- <-~a u
AL-8
AL-2
AL-9
AL-11
AL-1 2
AL-1
AL-4
AL-7
AL-3
AL-6
AL-10
AL-5
AL-1 3
Deten.
Time
1.4
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.8
2.3
2.3
2.3
3.0
3.0
3.5
3.8
7.0
Thai ljUNIJll 1UINS E,L/iiiiu ii-^i "^"""'" —
% BOD Reduction
Depth
(feetl
7.7
6.7
5.5
5.5
5.0
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
7.7
6.7
7.7
System
Feed
OD(2-3)
PF(1)
OD(3)
TF1(3)
TF2(BL)
PF(1)
PF(l-2)
PF(2)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(3)
PF(2)
PF(BL)
Organic Loading^
(ppd/lOOOcf) (E/M
1.1
7.3
0.4
6.2
12.1
5.0
5.3
5.0
3.6
3.8
2.3
3.6
3.4
R^tjol
0.15
0.37
0.06
0.65
0.59
0.64
0.36
0.30
0.23
0.27
0.07
0.53
0.13
Temp .
26
30
25
15
11
30
16
24
23
21
23
14
23
Unit
Mixed
negative
60.3
negative
57.3
64.2
69.7
34.7
44.9
43.9
62.9
35.9
77.3
81.4
Effect of
Settling
61.0
-
42.0
54.9
11.0
-
-
56.6
-
51.3
75.1
22.0
10.6
Unit
Settled
negative
-
negative
80.7
68.2
—
—
76.1
—
81.9
84.0
82.3
83.3
Over-
all
86.0
—
93.4
85.8
74.1
—
-
-
—
—
—
—
—
Settled
Effluent
BOD (mg/1),
5 — "
32
"~
13
40
146
~~
—
49
—
38
35
39
104
-------
H
&
tr1
SUMMARY OF AERATED LAGOON SOLIDS RESULTS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TEST CONDITIONS
EDITED TEST RESULTS
Test
Deten.
Time
(days)
% Solids Reduction
Depth
(feet)
System
Feed
Organic Loading
(ppd/1000cf)
(F/M
Ratio)
Total
Volatile
Total
Suspended
Volatile
Suspended
VJ1
AL-8
AL-2
AL-9
AL-11
AL-12
AL-1
AL-4
AL-7
AL-3
AL-6
AL-10
AL-5
AL-1 3
1.4
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.8
2.3
2.3
2.3
3.0
3.0
3.5
3.8
7.0
7.7
6.7
5.5
5.5
5.0
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
7.7
6.7
7.7
OD(2-3)
PF(1)
OD(3)
TF1(3)
TF2(BL)
PF(1)
PF(l-2)
PF(2)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(3)
PF(2)
PF(BL)
1.1
7.3
0.4
6.2
12.1
5.0
5.3
5.0
3.6
3.8
2.3
3.6
3.4
0.15
0.37
0.06
0.65
0.59
0.64
0.36
0.30
0.23
0.27
0.07
0.53
0.13
- 2.4
-12.9
-14.3
6.8
14.4
2.0
-51.2
- 2.2
- 3.9
- 2.4
-30.6
26.0
9.9
- 8.5
-17.6
-20.9
12.5
24.7
14.2
-43.2
6.6
- 1.2
9.2
-26.7
30.3
21.8
-436.9
-51.5
-59.1
24.0
26,8
- 3.7
-95.0
-65.3
-16.5
-13.4
-150.4
60.8
-25.3
-378.1
-107.9
- 68.0
12.2
11.1
- 12.9
-114.8
- 76.4
- 42.1
- 33.0
-211.7
41.1
- 35.2
-------
r*
w
Ui
SUMMARY OF AERATED LAGOON COLOR, pH AND NUTRIENT RESULTS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TEST CONDITIONS
EDITED TEST RESULTS
AL-8
AL-2
AL-9
AL-11
AL-12
AL-1
AL-4
AL-7
AL-3
AL-6
AL-10
AL-5
AL-13
1.4
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.8
2.3
2.3
2.3
3.0
3.0
3.5
3.8
7.0
7.7
6.7
5.5
5.5
5.0
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
7.7
6.7
7.7
OD(2-3)
PF(1)
OD(3)
TF1(3)
TF2(BL)
PF(1)
PF(l-2)
PF(2)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(3)
PF(2)
PF(BL)
1.1
7.3
0.4
6.2
12.1
5.0
5.3
5.0
3.6
3.8
2.3
3.6
3.4
0.15
0.37
0.06
0.65
0.59
0.64
0.36
0.30
0.23
0.27
0.07
0.53
0.13
% Reduction
Apparent
Color J3H
81.8
- 3.2
-61.0
34.3
16.6
14.9
2.0
11.1
14.9
16.6
-48.1
48.8
25.6
-3.4
9.5
-1.6
-0.3
5.9
2.6
2.1
-2.1
-2.0
3.1
6.4
2.3
13.6
NH--N
3
49.1
-
-12.3
55.5
73.8
84.6
46.9
72.6
48.2
91.4
18.2
-260.1
PO.-P
_
54.2
-
-48.8
27.9
-13.0
3.0
25.7
-119.9
20.3
12.9
65.6
- 2.8
-------
LAGOON AND DITCH WITHOUT CLARIFICATION
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Effluent (Unsettled)
61
FIGURE 11
-------
PILOT AERATED LAGOON WITH SETTLED BOD'S
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
FIGURE 12
62
-------
MODEL FOR PILOT AERATED LAGOON
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
V
3.0
2.0
1.0
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
e
Legend
Primary Feed (PF)
Primary Feed after TFI
Black Liquor + PF
Black Liquor + PF after TF 2
Range of Values
|.424 (l.023)T"2°t
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
•tj
M
Q
-------
COMPARISON OF OBSERVED EFFICIENCIES AND AERATED LAGOON MODEL
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
BOD,- of Effluent (mg/1) Treatment Efficiency (%)
Test Feed Observed Predicted Observed Predicted
AL-5 PF 39 39 82.3 82.5
AL-6 PF 38 40 81.9 81.5
AL-7 PF 49 45 76.7 78.1
AL-8 OD 32 7 negative 69.5
AL-9 OD 13 2 negative 73.3
AL-10 PF 35 35 84.2 84.4
AL-11 TF1 40 65 80.7 68.8
AL-12 TF2(BL) 146 145 68.2 68.3
AL-13 PF(BL) 104 53 83.3 91.5
TABLE 16
-------
SECTION VIH
OXIDATION DITCH TREATMENT
The Oxidation Ditch Process
The Research Institute for Public Health Engineering in The Netherlands
conducted extensive research with the objective of reliable and economical
means of sewage treatment for small communities. What resulted in 1957
was the oxidation ditch treatment process which is essentially an extended
aeration process providing aeration in excess of 24 hours (15). For
economy and simplicity, an earthen ditch in the shape of a racetrack was
used for the aeration tank and air was provided by a horizontally mounted
aeration rotor. Intermittent operation of the rotor permitted the ditch
to serve also as the final clarifier in the first oxidation ditches.
The same effect can be accomplished by clarification of the ditch overflow
and return of the settled sludge back to the aeration basin.
The oxidation ditch or extended aeration process is generally operated
without controlled sludge wasting because the daily accumulation of sludge
solids in the system becomes negligible for sewage when the aeration
period extends beyond 18 to 24 hours. More details on the oxidation ditch
process can be found in the literature (5)(9)(15).
Successful application of the oxidation ditch process has been reported
in Ontario, Canada (15), Alaska (9), and other locations in the United
States (10)(18) for the treatment of sewage but the process has not been
employed previously in the U.S. for the treatment of kraft pulp and paper
mill effluents.
The fact that excess solids might be negligible coupled with the fact
that dewatering and disposal of secondary sludge solids can be an impor-
tant cost in industrial effluent treatment made an evaluation of the
oxidation ditch process very desirable. Its relatively long detention
time should minimize the effect of shock loads and reduce the need for
close control of the treatment process even on an effluent stream of
highly variable composition.
Project Results on Pilot Oxidation Ditch
A total of 8 test periods with clarification and sludge return were com-
pleted on the pilot Oxidation Ditch (OD) with Clarifier 2 (CL2) during
the project. Two other tests were conducted without clarification and
have been discussed in SECTION V. More testing was planned but mechan-
ical difficulties with the special chain drive arrangement on the pilot
brush aerator caused several serious delays. This same type of problem
would not be experienced with full-scale equipment since chain drives are
no longer being used, according to the manufacturer.
-------
The results from all test periods have been summarized on separate pages
and are contained with the respective Clarifier 2 results in TABLES 94
through 111 in the APPENDIX (starting on page 185).
The test conditions have been arrayed with respect to detention time and
depth. The average BOD,, removals are shown in this format in TABLE 17
(page 62). The same format has been used to show solids changes across
this OD-Clarifier 2 system in TABLE 18 (page 63) and apparent color, pH,
and nutrient changes in TABLE 19 (page 64). FIGURE 14 (page 65) shows
certain test parameters and BOD removal arrayed with respect to
temperature. These TABLES and FIGURES will be referenced in the following
discussions.
BOD Removals Across Pilot Oxidation Ditch Process
As can be seen in both TABLE 17 and FIGURE 14, the average BOD removals
for the oxidation ditch process employing sludge return were above 80
percent in all cases (except one) when PF without black liquor was feed
for the system. The highest removal at 1-day detention was 86.6 percent
at an average temperature of 30°C. Results from two test periods at 2-day
detention exceed that average removal. They were 89.8 percent at 27°C
and 93.7 percent at 29°C. The BOD removal in OD appears to depend more
upon temperature and detention time than expected. See mathematical model
at the end of this SECTION.
The most significant fact is that the process was run with no control
throughout the project once the feed rate, sludge return rate, and aerator
submergence were set for a given test period. All sludge underflow from
Clarifier 2 was recycled to OD. None was wasted except for the incidents
relating to drainage of the OD and/or Clarifier 2 identified by date in
TABLE 40 of the APPENDIX (page 130). Any buildup of excess sludge would
have been lost during these failures. The question, therefore, has not
been completely resolved concerning extent of sludge handling and dis-
posal facilities still required with the oxidation ditch process on kraft
wastewater.
Solids Removals Across Pilot Oxidation Ditch Process
The average solids reductions shown in TABLE 18 are based on a compari-
son between the feed to OD and the effluent from Clarifier 2 (except tests
OD-1 and OD-2) since the solids overflowing from OD are internally main-
tained at a high level for the biological process. With a single
unexplained exception, all measured forms of solids decreased across the
OD-Clarifier 2 system.
Suspended solids reductions ranged from 13.0 percent to 83.2 percent with
most ranging from approximately 50 to 67 percent. Average suspended
solids levels in the treated effluent ranged from 69 to 262 mg/1 when
black liquor was not being added. Other solids levels can be seen on the
individual test period summaries in the APPENDIX.
66
-------
Apparent Color, pH, and Nutrient Change Across Pilot Oxidation Ditch
TABLE 19 summarizes the results of changes in apparent color, pH, and
nutrients across the OD-Clarifier 2 system (tests OD-3 through OD-10).
Apparent color (i.e., with suspended solids not removed before testing)
decreased in all situations when the system feed was PF without black
liquor addition. Reductions ranged from 22.7 to 69.2 percent, leaving
final levels of 300 to 1350 color units in the treated effluent.
The pH changes through the treatment process were not great. Final
values in all cases ranged from an average pH 7.2 to 7.8.
The OD-Clarifier 2 system was an effective process for reducing ammonia
nitrogen and phosphate phosphorus. The ammonia reductions ranged from
32.2 to 95.5 with most reductions being over 75 percent. Phosphate
was reduced as much as 67.6 percent over the measured levels in the
feed. In one test period an average increase was recorded while in
another, a 6.4 percent decrease was found. Otherwise, the removals
were all above 30 percent. Additional information on nitrogen forms will
be presented in SECTION VIII.
Dissolved Oxygen Levels in Pilot Oxidation Ditch
Oxygen was always maintained at average levels above 0.9 mg/1 in the OD
basin at the point of overflow. Lower levels probably occurred toward the
bottom of the basin, especially when operated at the greater depths.
Several oxygen profiles are presented in SECTION VIII.
Change in Temperature Across Pilot Oxidation Ditch
Average temperatures as shown by individual test period for OD in the
APPENDIX dropped by 7°C to 12°C during treatment at the 1-day and 2-day
detention times. Such decreases for a given basin and aerator are a
function of ambient temperature and detention time.
Mathematical Models of Oxidation Ditch Results
The oxidation ditch data were analyzed in a manner similar to that for
the aerated lagoon. FIGURE 15 (page 66) shows the graphical solution
which was found to best fit these data. In this FIGURE, two graphical
relationships are presented. The average food to microorganism ratio
(F/M) of the system is the distinction.
One relationship is presented for an F/M ratio of 0.3. This F/M ratio is
considered to be in the range for normal aerobic biological treatment
design, although at the lower end. For this F/M ratio, a reaction rate
constant of 3.37 and a temperature coefficient of 1.063 is indicated.
67
-------
For the lower F/M ratio of 0.06 (indication of a starved condition in the
biological system), a reaction rate constant of 0.92 and a temperature
coefficient of 1.256 was found. As for the aerated lagoon modeling, all
points in FIGURE 15 represent functions of an average of the edited data
for that test period. The range over which those data extended is
indicated by the lines which radiate from the respective average points.
The following equations are derived from the graphical relationship
presented in FIGURE 15:
For F/M =0.3
S - S
S
e
And for
F/M = 0.06
3.37(1.063)T~2°t
Where
S = BOD of influent (mg/1)
S = BOD of effluent (mg/1)
T = Temperature of ditch contents (°C)
t = Detention time (days)
The effluent BOD_ to be expected from the oxidation ditch can be solved
from the models and is as follows:
For F/M = 0.3
S
S =
e 1+3.37(1.063)T~2°t
And for
F/M = 0.06
S
S =
6 1+0.92(1.256)T~2°t
The temperature coefficient is therefore found to decrease as the F/M
ratio increases from 0.06 to 0.3. This variance is probably due to
changes in the individual biological particles. When the F/M ratio is
in the neighborhood of 0.3, the particles are more flocculant and, as
previously discussed, the rate of oxygen diffusion into the flocculant
particle becomes the more limiting factor. In the case of extremely low
68
-------
F/M ratios and very high F/M ratios, a dispersed growth condition exists
and the influence of temperature is more direct on the individual organ-
ism and its biokinetics rather than on the more physical aspect of
oxygen diffusion.
In addition, the large 6 value for the low F/M ratio is undoubtedly in-
fluenced by factors other than the biokinetic rate as it is doubtful that
biokinetics alone could account for such a large 8 value. Other influences
certainly include the fact that the BOD values are based on settled rather
than filtered samples.
A single point with an F/M ratio of approximately 1 is shown about midway
between the two plots presented in FIGURE 15. The location of this point
might tend to indicate that as the F/M ratio increases to 1 or above, a
more dispersed growth condition is realized and subsequently the tempera-
ture effect upon the biokinetics of the system becomes more pronounced.
In all cases, the F/M values are based on mixed liquor volatile suspended
solids, which are suspected of containing a large portion of non-
biological volatile solids such as cellulose, and for that reason should
not be construed as absolute F/M values.
TABLE 20 (page 67) presents the observed efficiencies and effluent BOD
concentrations compared to those levels which would be predicted by the
respective models just presented. These models should be applied on the
basis of the F/M ratios indicated. As can be seen, the correlation is
quite high. It should be re-emphasized at this point that the data
used in developing these models, as well as those for the other biological
systems and the analysis of those models was based on settled BOD data
whereas filtered BOD data have been more generally employed by others
for such mathematical modeling and model comparisons.
69
-------
i
tr<
SUMMARY OF OXIDATION DITCH BOD RESULTS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TEST CONDITIONS
EDITED TEST RESULTS
Test
OXIDATION
OD-2
OD-1
Deten.
Time
(days)
DITCH
2
3
Depth
(feet)
System
Feed
Organic
Loading
(Dod/lOOOcf) (F/I
TESTS WITHOUT CLARIFICATION
7.0 PF(1) 6.2
6.7 PF(1) 4.4
0
0
T Rat-in)
.36
.44
Temp.
31
31
%
Unit
Mixed
57.3
67.0
BOD,. Reduction
J Unit Over-
Settled all
_
Settled
Effluent
BOD,-(mK/ll
81
72
OXIDATION DITCH TESTS WITH CLARIFICATION AND SLUDGE RECYCLE
OD-4
OD-6
OD-3
OD-5
OD-9
OD-10
OD-7
OD-8
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
4.0
5.2
7.0
4.0
4.3
4.3
5.2
8.6
PF(2)
PF(2-3)
PF(l-2)
PF(2)
TF2(BL)
TFl(BL)
PF(3)
PF(3)
15.4
12.4
12.7
6.5
13.3
8.5
6.2
6.0
1.04
0.14
0.33
0.04
0.33
0.09
0.06
0.05
21
30
23
24
16
22
29
27
64.7
86.6
80.0
81.4
85.1
75.5
93.7
89.8
85.6
89.5
77
29
46
39
88
65
12
19
-------
H
>
W
SUMMARY OF OXIDATION DITCH SOLIDS RESULTS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TEST CONDITIONS
EDITED TEST RESULTS
Test
Deten.
Time
C davs )
% Solids Reduction
Depth
(feet)
System
Feed
Organic Loading
(ppd/1000r.f) CF/M Ratio) Total
Volatile
Total Suspended
Volatile
Suspended
OXIDATION DITCH TESTS WITHOUT CLARIFICATION
OD-2
OD-1
7.0
6.7
PF(1)
PF(1)
6.2
4.4
0.36
0.44
5.4
8.6
5.2
14.4
OXIDATION DITCH TESTS WITH CLARIFICATION AND SLUDGE RECYCLE
-37.0
-49.4
-83.7
-43.8
OD-4
OD-6
OD-3
OD-5
OD-9
OD-10
OD-7
OD-8
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
4.0
5.2
7.0
4.0
4.3
4.3
5.2
8.6
PF(2)
PF(2-3)
PF(l-2)
PF(2)
TF2(BL)
TFl(BL)
PF(3)
PF(3)
15.4
12.4
12.7
6.5
13.3
8.5
6.2
6.0
1.04
0.14
0.33
0.04
0.33
0.09
0.06
0.05
22.7
26.9
- 3.4
13.2
36.7
16.3
27.0
22.2
24.5
45.9
8.5
31.0
52.2
25,5
41.8
36.7
48.9
83.2
64.6
13.0
27.0
38.0
64.7
67.0
14.1
75.8
53.6
9.1
47.8
46.1
50.9
48.3
CO
-------
tn
SUMMARY OF OXIDATION DITCH COLOR, pH AND NUTRIENT RESULTS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
EDITED TEST RESULTS
(V)
Test
OXIDATION
OD-2
OD-1
OXIDATION
OD-4
OD-6
OD-3
OD-5
OD-9
OD-10
OD-7
OD-8
Deten.
Time
(days)
DITCH
2
3
DITCH
-------
PILOT OXIDATION DITCH WITH SLUDGE RETURN
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Clarified Effluent
(mg/l)
200
Clarified Effluent
FIGURE 14
-------
H
MODEL FOR PI LOT OXIDATION DITCH
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
>F
Legend
• Primary Feed (PF)
A Black Liquor 4- PF after TF 2
• Black Liquor + PF after TF I
(— Range of Values
22
24
26
28
-------
COMPARISON OF OBSERVED EFFICIENCIES AND OXIDATION DITCH MODEL
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
BOD of Effluent (mg/1) Treatment Efficiency(%)
Test F/M Feed Observed Predicted Observed Predicted
OD-3 0.33 PF 46 45 80.0 80.3
OD-6 0.14 PF 29 30 86.6 86.0
OD-9 0.33 TF2(BL) 88 89 85.1 84.2
OD-5 0.04 PF 39 38 81.4 81.8
OD-7 0.06 PF 12 13 93.7 93.5
OD-8 0.05 PF 19 18 89.8 90.3
OD-10 0.09 TF1 (BL) 65 68 75.5 74.5
OD-4 1.00 PF 77 - 64.7
75
TABLE 20
-------
SECTION IX
COMBINATION TREATMENT
Alternates for Combination Treatment
Flexibility was designed into the pilot treatment plant facilities in
order to allow multiple combinations of treatment units in series as well
as parallel operation. FIGURES 16 through 22 give schematic repre-
sentations of the ALTERNATES which were run during the project. Other
combinations were also possible. Results from the parallel operation of
all units as shown in ALTERNATE A have been discussed in the three pre-
vious SECTIONS. Combination test results will now be presented.
Nine combination test series were run during the project from which 12
separate combination tests can be identified as having mill clarified
effluent (called pilot feed or PF) for the system influent source. The
separate series by ALTERNATE with pilot unit sequence and test identifi-
cation were as follows:
ALTERNATE B - Trickling Filter to Aerated Lagoon (see FIGURE 17, page 76)
B-l (involves TF1): TF1-16 to AL-11
B-2 (involves TF2): TF2-17 to AL-12
ALTERNATE C - Trickling Filter to Oxidation Ditch (see FIGURE 18, page 77)
C-2 (involves TF2): TF2-17 to OD-9
C-3 (involves both TF's): TF2-18 to TF1-18 to OD-10
ALTERNATE D - Oxidation Ditch to Trickling Filter (see FIGURE 19, page 78)
D-2 (involves TF2): OD-8 to TF2-15
ALTERNATE E - Oxidation Ditch to Aerated Lagoon (see FIGURE 20, page 79)
E OD-6to AL-8
E OD-7 to AL-9
ALTERNATE F - Trickling Filters in Series (see FIGURE 21, page 80)
F-l (TF1 first) TF1-11 to TF2-11
F-l TF1-14 to TF2-14
F-2 (TF2 first) TF2-13 to TF1-13
F-2 TF2-18 to TF1-18
ALTERNATE G - Trickling Filter to Oxidation Ditch to Trickling Filter
(see FIGURE 22, page 81)
G TF2-17 to OD-9 to TF1-17
77
-------
The separate test period summaries in the APPENDIX contain the individual
unit results and show the "overall" BOD efficiencies for combination
treatment where applicable. The edited average values of efficiency have
been tabulated for each system and have all been presented in the previous
SECTIONS (See TABLES 5, 8, 13 and 17). Again, the notation of "overall
efficiency" is for combination treatment.
Both regular PF and black-liquor-dosed PF were used as feed depending
upon the test. The black-liquor-dosed feed will be indicated by (BL) .
The following discussion will be limited to the BOD removal capability of
biological units following other biological units and the overall removal
actually demonstrated.
Aerated Lagoon Preceded by Trickling Filter
The pilot Aerated Lagoon (AL) was preceded first by Trickling Filter 1
(TF1) and later in a second test by Trickling Filter 2 (TF2). Black
liquor was being added in the second sequence. Average BOD removals for
the two edited test periods were as follows:
Conditions of AL Feed Unit AL Results Overall
I.D. Recycle gpd/sf BOD Removal Temp Time BOD Removal BOD Removal
TF1-16 0 6000 36.4% 15°C 1.7d 80.7% 85.8%
TF2-17(BL) 0 6000 13.0% 11°C 1.8d 68.2% 74.1%
In both cases, AL was able to significantly reduce the BOD load being fed
to it from the roughing trickling filters. The first combination pro-
duced an effluent quality that was surpassed only by a detention time of
at least 3 days and higher temperatures in AL if used alone. The second
combination when black liquor was being added doesn't have a good basis
for comparison using AL alone. The other test on AL during the presence
of black liquor was at a detention time of 7 days and did give a better
efficiency than the TF-AL combination (compare final effluent quality of
146 mg/1 in combination test to 104 mg/1 in test AL-13).
Oxidation Ditch Preceded by Trickling Filter
The pilot Oxidation Ditch (OD) with Clarifier 2 was preceded by TF2 in two
different tests, both of which were run when black liquor was being added.
The second test had both filters ahead of OD. The average BOD removals
for the two edited test periods were as follows:
Conditions of OD Feed Unit OD Results Overall
I.D. Recycle gpd/sf BOD Removal Temp Time BOD Removal BOD Removal
TF2-17(BL) 0 6000 13.0% 16°C 2d 85.1% 85.6%
TF2 &
TFl(BL) 1:1 6000 56.9% 22°C 2d 75.5% 89.5%
-------
In both these cases, OD with Clarifier 2 was able to significantly reduce
the BOD load being fed to it from the roughing trickling filters. In the
first combination little was accomplished by the roughing filter, although
the effect to the further treatability of the effluent may have been
significant since OD was able to remove 85.1 percent of the remaining BOD
at the low temperature of 16°C even though other results showed OD to be
very temperature sensitive. A better basis for comparison would be de-
sirable. In the second combination, OD removed less BOD but contributed
to a higher overall removal since the filters in series had done so well
on the black-liquor-dosed wastewater. Final treated effluent BOD con-
centrations for the two combination tests were 88 mg/1 and 65 mg/1,
respectively.
Trickling Filter Preceded by Oxidation Ditch
TF2 was preceded by OD in one test period when black liquor was not being
added. Average BOD- removals for the single test period are as follows:
Conditions_of TF2 Feed Unit TF2 Results Overall
I.D. Temp Time BOD Removal Recycle gpd/sf BOD Removal BOD Removal
OD-8 27°C 2d 89.8% 0 6000 11.8% 90.4%
These TF2 results are plotted along with other trickling filter combi-
nations in FIGURE 23 (see page 82).
In this single case, the polishing filter was able to remove an addi-
tional 11.8 percent of the BOD even though the OD-Clarifier 2 system had
already achieved an 89.8 percent removal. The overall removal of 90.4
percent produced a final effluent quality of 16 mg/1 BOD5«
Aerated Lagoon Preceded by Oxidation Ditch
Two test series were attempted in which treated effluent from the OD-
Clarifier 2 system was fed to AL. A little over 3 months, consecutively,
were spent on this combination but the BOD content in the lagoon efflu-
ent never equilibrated with the low level Being fed from OD. (Immedi-
ately prior to this combination, AL had received a much higher loading
which never got treated and/or diluted out completely.) In the two test
series, the BOD contents of the OD clarified effluent were 29 mg/1 and
12 mg/1, respectively, compared to edited test averages from AL of 32 mg/1
and 13 mg/1, respectively. No doubt the placing of a lagoon following
the oxidation ditch process would result in a more stabilized effluent
than could be demonstrated in this project. It is very doubtful that
supplemental aeration would be required in such a lagoon.
79
-------
Trickling Filters in Series
The tests about to be reported are not comparable to conventional high-
rate filters in series because TF1 always operated with Clarifier 1
(except test TF1-16 which was not a combination test) and the recycle to
TF1 was settled sludge, whereas TF2 was of conventional design with
filtrate recycle only. Therefore, when TF1 came first, as in ALTERNATE
F-l, the wastewater was clarified midway in treatment and again at the
end of treatment since TF2 effluent samples were settled prior to BOD
determinations. When TF2 came first in series, only the final treated
effluent received clarification after passing through both filters.
Two test series were conducted in which TF1 was the feed for TF2. An
additional two test series were conducted in which TF2 fed TF1. One of
the latter tests was run while black liquor was being added to PF. In
all combination tests with both filters, the operating parameters for
the two filters were kept the same for a given test period.
These parameters, along with BOD removals, were as follows:
Feed TF Conditions Feed Unit Second Unit Overall
I.D. Recycle gpd/sf BOD Removal BOD Removal BOD Removal
TF1-11 1:1 4000 68.6% 6.7% 70.7%
TF1-14 1:1 4000 50.6% 69.1% 84.7%
TF1-13 1:1 4000 41.4% 48.7% 63.8%
TF2-18(BL) 1:1 6000 42.1% 34.6% 56.9%
The second unit results are plotted along with other trickling filter
combinations in FIGURE 23. In only one case of the filters in series
did the second unit not perform on an almost equal basis with the first
unit. The combination significantly improved BOD quality in the other
three cases. The respective final treated effluent BOD levels were
58, 31, 87, and 273 mg/1.
^Trickling Filter Preceded by Trickling Filter-Oxidation Ditch Combination
A single test with three units in series was conducted through the final
phase of the project when black liquor was being added to the pilot plant
feed. This test period had TF1 on the end of the TF2-OD combination
reported earlier in this SECTION.
Essentially no additional BOD was removed by TF1 when this unit followed
the TF2-OD system. These TF1 results are plotted along with other
trickling filter combinations in FIGURE 23.
Applicability of Mathematical Models to Combination Treatment
The models presented in previous SECTIONS of this report were developed
for the particular pilot units when the influent feed source was PF with-
out supplemental black liquor and without previous biological treatment.
80
-------
These conditions force a limitation on the applicability of each model.
Therefore, combination treatment which involves one pilot unit receiving
the partially-treated effluent from another of the pilot units may not
correlate to the models. There are, however some cases of high corre-
lation for these situations.
The oxidation ditch model, for example, appears to hold where the effluent
is first subjected to single-stage or even 2-stage trickling filtration
when black liquor is present. (See tests OD-9 and OD-10.) However, such
an extrapolation is unjustified based of the limited information.
The aerated lagoon model did not respond well to any feed which had re-
ceived previous treatment, except in the case where the PF had been
supplemented with black liquor and subjected to trickling filtration prior
to the aerated lagoon. In a parallel instance where the unsupplemented
PF was subjected to trickling filtration prior to the aerated lagoon, the
agreement between that observed and that predicted is not good.
With respect to the trickling filters there is some indication that the
agreement between that which was observed and that predicted by the models
for feeds other than PF is reasonable at least part of the time, but not
always. For this reason, use of the model for any application other than
with PF as feed would appear unwise.
The general limitation of the mathematical models to the pilot feed source
for which they were developed is not intended to indicate that a combina-
tion model could not be developed, but only that the data which were
gathered during the course of the project were not sufficient to develop
other dependable models.
81
-------
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PILOT TREATMENT PLANT
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Clarified Mill Effluent
'
i i
i
•
PC
0
ALTERNATE A
All Systems in Parallel
Bleach Plant Effluent
RETURN TO ANY SYSTEM
Excess
Sludge
Discharge
-------
o
w
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PILOT TREATMENT PLANT
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Clarified Mill Effluent
ALTERNATE B
Trickling filter to Aerated Lagoon
B-l involves TF I (at pictured)
B-2 involves TF 2
Bleach Plant Effluent
RdTURN TO ANY SYSTEM
Excess
Sludge
Discharge
-------
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PILOT TREATMENT PLANT
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Clarified Mill Effluent
Od
AERATED
LAGOON
a
a
w
00
Bleach Plant Effluent
Excess To Overflow
• ill r*" E»cess T
•-1 fc"1 Overflow
ALTERNATE C
Trickling Filter to Oxidation Ditch
C-l involves TFI (not run)
C-2 involves 1F2 (as pictured)
C-3 involves both TF*s in series
Excess
Sludge
Discharge
-------
o
w
I-1
^o
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PILOT TREATMENT PLANT
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Clarified Mill Effluent
AERATED
LAGOON
Bleach Plant Effluent
Excess To Overflow -*-OTl_l~^ Excess To
"• •«• n»*rfio«
ALTERNATE D
Oxidation Ditch to Tricklina, Filter
D-l involves TF I (not run)
D-2 involves TF2(os pictured)
RETURN TO ANYl SYSTEM
Excess
Sludge
Discharge
-------
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PILOT TREATMENT PLANT
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Clarified Mill Effluent
AERATED
LAGOON
o
pa
Bleach Plant Effluent
ALTERNATE E
Oxidation Ditch to Aerated Lagoon
Excess To Overflow-*-||Tr |-»-Excess To
•-1 I-J Overflow
RBTURN TO ANY SYSTEM
Excess
Sludge
Discharge
-------
H
o
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PILOT TREATMENT PLANT
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Glorified Mill Effluent
ALTERNATE F
Trickling Filters in Series
F-l involves TF I feeding TF 2 (as pictured)
F-2 involves TF2 feeding TF I
Bleach Plont Effluent
Excess
Sludge
Discharge
-------
SCHEMATIC DIAGRAM OF PILOT TREATMENT PLANT
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Clarified Mill Effluent
O*
o
a
to
N)
ALTERNATE G
Trickling Filter to Oxidation Ditch to
Trickling Filter (as pictured)
Bleach Plant Effluenl
Excess
Sludge
Discharge
-------
TRICKLING FILTERS PRECEDED BY TREATMENT
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TF-Test:
Feed:
0 Recycle
Recycle: Feed
500
Organic
Loading 300
(ppd/IOOOcf)
100
Hydraulic
Loading
(gpd/«f) 2000
Settled Effluent
FIGURE 23
90
-------
SECTION X
SUPPORT STUDIES
Aeration and Mixing in Aeration Basins
Surface aerators of the two types used in this project agitate as well as
oxygenate the basin contents. The degree of agitation or mixing is a
function of the power input to the basin but also depends upon the con-
figuration of the system and the particular aeration device.
Eckenfelder (8) has related the power input to degree of mixing for tur-
bine aerators. He shows that 0.006 to 0.01 horsepower is required per
1000 gallons of basin capacity (hp/1000 gallons) in order to achieve uni-
form dissolved oxygen. However, for suspension of activated sludge which
takes a minimum velocity of 0.4 to 0.5 feet per second, much higher power
levels are required and distance from the aerator becomes a factor. At
14 feet, 0.02 to 0.03 hp/1000 gallons are required, while at 35 feet
distance 0.05 to 0.06 hp/1000 gallons are required. These values show
approximately a 10-fold increase in horsepower requirements if the objec-
tive at 35 feet from the aerator is sludge suspension rather than just
uniform dissolved oxygen.
The aerators used in this project were the horizontally mounted brush
aerator in the racetrack-shaped pilot Oxidation Ditch, and the vertically
mounted turbine-type surface aerator in the square-shaped pilot Aerated
Lagoon. See FIGURE 24 (page 95) for dimensions of the basin.
It was possible to vary basin depth and aerator blade submergence, thereby
changing the power input to the basin contents. The resulting average
power loadings for the individual test periods in the pilot Oxidation
Ditch and Aerated Lagoon have been tabulated with other pertinent data in
TABLE 21 (page 96) . The BOD actually removed per net horsepower input
is also shown in this TABLE and should be of value in the design of
such systems.
The values are seen to range from 2.3 to 5.3 pounds of BOD,, removed per
net horsepower hour if the Aerated Lagoon effluent is clarified. Lower
values resulted if no clarification was provided at the actual test
detention times.
The Oxidation Ditch with brush aeration removed from 1.5 to 5.0 pounds of
BOD per net horsepower when operated with clarification and sludge re-
turn. Lower values comparable to the first tests on the Aerated Lagoon
resulted if no clarification was provided.
Support studies were conducted to obtain information on dissolved oxygen
levels, temperature, velocity and sludge depth at various points in the
two basins under different test conditions. The results of these studies
are summarized below.
91
-------
Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature in Pilot Lagoon
TABLE 22 (page 97) shows data from dissolved oxygen and temperature pro-
files in the pilot Aerated Lagoon. A total of eight studies were conducted
using the different testing depths in an overall basin depth of 6.7 feet.
Also included in the tabulated results of this TABLE are two tests per-
formed at a depth of 2.0 feet when the total basin depth was 7.7 feet.
In general, it can be seen that the basin contents were kept nearly
homogenous with respect to temperature and dissolved oxygen levels for
all power loadings which ranged from less than 0.01 net hp/1000 gallons
to greater than 0.02 net hp/1000 gallons.
The variance noticed most often is a 1.0-foot depth dissolved oxygen level
that is 0.1 to 0.4 mg/1 higher than the mid-depth value. The bottom dis-
solved oxygen level was never more than 0.3 mg/1 less than the mid-depth
value in these tests and frequently it equalled the mid-depth value. With
only one exception, the effluent levels were within 0.2 mg/1 of the 1.0-
foot depth average level. The reproducibility of the dissolved oxygen
probe in the field is no better than plus or minus 0.2 mg/1. Any correc-
tion for this variation could support the conclusion that the basin
contents were kept nearly homogenous for the power levels tested.
Velocities and Sludge Buildup in Pilot Lagoon
TABLE 23 (page 98) contains a summary of the data on velocities and
directions in the pilot Aerated Lagoon for two different general power
loadings and two different basin depths. Directions of flow are shown
for the highest power level input only since it is believed that the
meter was not sensitive enough to accurately indicate directions when the
velocity was far below 0.5 feet per second.
It is noted that for the power level above 0.01 net hp/1000 gallons, the
velocity profile is fairly uniform at a given test point. The surface
aerator is providing the same degree of agitation on the bottom of the
basin as it is close to the surface. Test points 5 and 6 are close to
the aerator as shown in the sketch and they have the highest velocities,
as would be expected. Points 3 and 4 together, and points 7 and 8 to-
gether, consitute equidistant extremes at 13.5 feet from the surface
aerator. For the highest power level test, the velocities ranged from
0.3 to 0.5 feet per second in a rather uniform fashion at this distance.
The situation changes as the power input drops below 0.01 net hp/1000
gallons. Although not so clearly defined in the last test in TABLE 23
as in the middle two tests, it can be seen that velocity definitely
drops off with depth at this lower power input. Again, highest
velocities occur closest to the aerator with minor exceptions.
Some sludge had collected on the basin bottom by this time and is so
indicated in this TABLE.
92
-------
Sludge buildup was recorded in separate testing during the project. A
chronological listing of sludge depth is recorded in TABLE 24 (page 99)
along with pertinent information on system operation.
The sludge depth was seen to increase much more when the lagoon depth was
7.7 feet and the power input was less than 0.01 net hp/1000 gallons than
when the depth was 6.7 feet and the power input was higher. As TABLE 24
shows, the pilot Aerated Lagoon ended up with 8 to 12 inches of sludge
on the bottom toward the end of the project (Test AL-13).
The sludge appeared to change position during Test AL-13 although the
major deposits were at those points farthest from the aerator, as would
be expected. The sludge sampled during Test AL-13 contained from 11 to
18 percent solids except under the aerator where it was very lean. The
volatile content of the sludge solids ranged from 26 to 38 percent,
thereby indicating some inorganic buildup within the aeration basin at
lower power levels.
The information taken at the test points may not necessarily be indicative
of sludge deposits in other locations of the pilot lagoon. In general,
it can be concluded that sludge builds up at a greater rate as power input
drops. Such a buildup is undesirable because it reduces the retention
volume of the basin and may eventually have to be removed. The other
objection involves the ultimate fate of the organic solids which get de-
posited. No information was developed during this project on the fate of
such solids, but it would seem likely that the BOD of the solids would add
to the BOD load of the basin, thereby requiring more oxygen in treatment
with passage of time.
Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature in Pilot Ditch
TABLE 25 (page 100)contains a summary of the dissolved oxygen and temper-
ature profiles found in the pilot Oxidation Ditch. Results from two
different basin depths at about the same loading are tabulated. The
trends observed here are different from those found in the pilot Aerated
Lagoon. The reasons are twofold. First, the power input was above 0.01
net hp/1000 gallons for all tests. Second, the energy input to the basin
contents from the brush aeration caused the total liquid volume to move
around the racetrack-shaped basin.
Vertical mixing is claimed by the aerator manufacturer because the blades
of the brush are gradually offset from one end to the other. The data
tend to substantiate this claim on vertical mixing because in all tests
the dissolved oxygen level was not found to decrease with depth. The
temperature was found to be uniform throughout the basin contents in all
tests.
Because of the "plug flow" beyond the aerator, a decrease in oxygen would
be expected as biological activity proceeds and the liquid follows the
path around and back to the aerator. Such a decrease, ranging from 0.2
93
-------
to 0.5 mg/1 is noted in all the data after the first test. It is con-
cluded that the oxidation ditch operation was completely mixed with re-
spect to temperature but was a short-term plug flow system as evidenced
by the change in dissolved oxygen level along the length of the tank.
Velocities and Sludge Buildup in Pilot Ditch
TABLE 26 (page 101) contains a summary of the velocity measurements made
in the pilot Oxidation Ditch for varying depths at power inputs above
0.01 net hp/1000 gallons.
When the oxidation ditch basin was at the 8.6-foot depth (Test OD-8 for
results shown), the basin contents showed little motion below the first
5 feet, yet during the test series at a basin depth of 6.7 feet (Test
OD-1) , the basin contents were almost completely mixed with respect to
velocity except for surface values closest to the aerator.
Comparing the two'test series at depths less than 6.7 feet reveals nearly
complete mixing except in the last 12 to 14 inches of basin depth.
Here liquid motion was detected, but it was generally a trace to 0.1
feet per second.
In summary, it appears that the basin contents are kept in fairly uniform
motion under the influence of the brush type aerator at the power levels
studied when the depth is approximately 7 feet or less. Power inputs
greater than approximately 0.010 to 0.015 hp/1000 gallons would defin-
itely be necessary to keep the contents mixed as the basin depth is
increased beyond the 7 foot level.
Concerning direction of flow, no separate tabulation of these measure-
ments has been prepared because the directions at the higher velocities
do not differ greatly from the expected direction around the racetrack-
shaped basin. As stated earlier for the pilot Aerated Lagoon, no accu-
rate value can be read for the very low velocities sometimes encountered.
Sludge depth in the pilot Oxidation Ditch was studied with duration of
operation, but the mechanical difficulties required occasional drainage
of the system (see TABLE 40,page 130 in the APPENDIX). These interruptions
left no valid longterm data to be analyzed. In general, sludge deposits
on the bottom were sparse and never found to be more than two inches deep.
Accumulations were observed at the tank ends when the basin was emptied.
These accumulations were not more than several inches thick.
Summary of Findings on Aeration and Mixing
In general, the following can be concluded:
Dissolved oxygen and temperature can be maintained uniformly at
lower power levels than required to keep solids suspended.
The aerated lagoon process will allow solids to be deposited on the basin
bottom at power levels that in the oxidation ditch will keep the solids
suspended.
94
-------
The directional flow capabilities of the brush aerator are very desirable.
Special BOD Studies
Some work was completed during the project on the relationship between
mixed, settled, and filtered 5-day BOD, COD to BOD ratios, and long term
BOD's of the pilot plant feed and the various system effluents. TABLE 27
(page 102) contains a summary of the BOD and COD test results.
It is noted that a greater part of the pilot feed (PF) BOD remained after
filtering than did any of the system effluents. In the case of effluents
from the pilot Aerated Lagoon (AL) and Oxidation Ditch (OD) , the soluble
BOD values in May and October of 1969 ranged from 1 to 11 mg/1. The
trickling filter effluents were higher in soluble BOD except for the
test results on Trickling Filter 2 (TF2) when the feed to the system came
from the Oxidation Ditch.
The March to May, 1970 data in TABLE 27 show a changing COD to BOD5 ratio
through the treatment processes. The PF averaged 3.1:1 COD to BOD . This
t
ratio was changed in TF2 to 4.1:1 and in AL to 11.9:1, meaning tha
was destroyed more completely than COD during treatment, as would be
expected. The ratio was raised to approximately 9.6:1 when OD was fed
from the filters. The ratio reached 11.2:1 when TF1 was fed from OD that
was being fed from TF2.
The proportion of mixed to settled BOD for TF2 operating on the black-
liquor-dosed pilot feed which is symbolized PF(BL) was much higher than the
same system when the PF had only bleach liquor added to it and first passed
through TF1 (feeds of PF(2) and PF(3)). Compare 449 to 420 and 165 to 50.
These results imply that little of the total BOD5 was converted to settle-
able solids when the system was not being fed black liquor supplemented
pilot feed.
Concerning long-term BOD results, a total of six tests were run during
the project. Three samples of pilot feed or PF were tested and, during
each of these tests, one system effluent was also tested. The jug tech-
nique which was used did not cross-check with the standard BOD .
Therefore the results are relative rather than absolute and should be
treated accordingly. A summary of the results follows:
Jug BOD (mg/1) BOD Ratio First Order
Date Sample 5-Ly 21-Day 21-Day/5-Day Temperature Coefficient
4-28-69 PF 142 293 2.1:1 °-°"
AL 57 128 2.2:1 °-054
5-19-69 PF 117 222 1.9:1 °.J°»
TF1 57 133 2.3:1 °'045
8-20-69 PF 159 337 2.1:1
TF1 80 205 2.6:1 °-074
95
-------
First order curves were fitted to the BOD data but in most cases do not
describe the data beyond about 10 days.
The pilot feed data in all three tests takes a second jump after 9 to 12
days and appears to be still rising after 21 days. The 21-day to 5-day
BOD ratio remains close to 2:1 in all three tests.
The AL data and the first set of data for TF1 are fairly well fitted by a
first order curve even out to 21 days where the curves level off. The
TF2 data took a jump after 15 days and was only beginning to level off
after 27 days.
The temperature coefficients for the first order portion of the long
term BOD curves for pilot feed ranged from approximately 0.10 to 0.14/°C
while the system effluents in the first two cases had temperature
coefficients of about 0.05/°C.
The trickling filter data that could not be fitted beyond 15 days by a
first order curve had a temperature coefficient of 0.074/°(L Ultimate
BOD values cannot be taken from the first order portions of the curves
which showed jumps. In any case, relative rather than absolute values
were obtained and it was for this reason that additional long term BOD
tests were not planned.
National Council (4) found an average ratio for COD to BOD of 3.8:1 for
raw filtered effluents from 8 different pulp and paper mills. With
biological treatment, this average ratio was raised to 16.3:1. A lignin
correction reduced the average raw effluent ratio to 2.2:1 and the treated
ratio to 4.4:1. They concluded that rapid BOD estimation based on the COD
test was not possible for kraft effluents because there were no fixed
relationships even with the lignin correction.
Kraft Effluent Interference to Winkler Dissolved Oxygen Test
Dissolved oxygen determinations are very important both in monitoring the
operation of biological treatment and in the measurement of biochemical
oxygen demand. Such determinations can be made chemically by the standard
Winkler test or polarographically by either the membrane electrode or the
dropping mercury electrode. Past investigators who have studied the
Winkler method versus the polarographic methods have found that the Winkler
method can give appreciably lower dissolved oxygen concentrations in
certain contaminated solutions.
McKeown (17) reported on comprehensive studies comparing Winkler results
to membrane electrode results in solutions containing pulp and paper mill
effluent and found the electrode measurement to be the better technique
both in the laboratory and in the field. Based on these studies, The Mead
Corporation has generally used the membrane electrode in field work
involving measurements of dissolved oxygen in treatment basins, rivers and
lakes. The membrane probe was used for all field measurements in the
96
-------
present project. However, its use in the laboratory for the BOD test was
limited generally to obtaining initial dissolved oxygen values of the
effluent samples before dilution and incubation. The standard Winkler
test was then run on the dilution water and, after 5 days, on the diluted
samples.
The effect of pulp and paper effluents on the Winkler test when diluted
6 to 150 times in the BOD test was considered to be slight. Comparative
tests during and after this project using a temperature compensated mem-
brane probe (see PROCEDURES) showed this assumption to generally be
correct if applied to the first 18 months of the project when the pilot
feed was taken as it came from the mill primary clarifier or when mixed
with bleach plant effluent. For these situations the membrane probe
values were slightly higher on the average but no trends could be defined
and there would be little effect in calculation of BOD's since a differ-
ence of readings is used.
Laboratory work did show that a correction is necessary for the Winkler
determination of dissolved oxygen when the pilot feed was being supple-
mented with black liquor during the final phase of the project. Inhibi-
tion of the Winkler value was found to be a function of sample volume
added to the BOD bottle and also a function of the method of treatment to
some extent. Corrections were derived for application to Winkler values
after incubation as follows:
True D.O. = Winkler D.O. + AD.O.
where, for PF, TF1, and TF2:
AD.O. = 0.131 x sample volume up to 10 ml,
and
AD.O. = 1.31 + 0.054 x (sample volume - 10 ml) for more;
while, for AL:
AD.O. = 0.097 x sample volume up to 10 ml,
and
AD.O. = 0.97 + 0.033 x (sample volume - 10 ml) for more;
and for OD:
AD.O. = 0.060 x sample volume up to 10 ml,
and
AD.O. = 0.60 + 0.019 x (sample volume - 10 ml.) for more.
As can be seen, the correction is greater for the pilot feed and the
trickling filters than for the aeration basin effluents. When the
systems were run in combination, the system effluent was corrected the
same as the unit it followed.
97
-------
In conclusion, it is very desirable that future BOD work on this type of
wastewater be conducted with the membrane electrode rather than the Winkler
test since the Winkler can be reading low part of the time and consistent
results may not be obtained.
Dye Studies on Pilot Systems
Several tracer dye studies were conducted on tne pilot system at the ter-
mination of the field testing in May, 1970, Black liquor was still being
added to the pilot feed at this time but its large consumption of dye
made its presence very undesirable, so it was removed. Since the pilot
feed was the only large volume source of water available at the site, it
had to be used during the dye studies.
Because of long detention times in the two aeration basins, the black
liquor content could not be flushed out in the available time. Response
analyses of the impulse inputs are, therefore, not possible because of the
uncertainty of remaining black liquor interference with and comsumption
of the dye. Therefore, only the times to the occurrence of peak dye con-
centration in these basins will be reported here.
The pilot Oxidation Ditch was being operated at a depth of 4.3 feet and a
theoretical detention time of 2 days. The power input during the dye
tests was greater than 0.02 net hp/1000 gallons, for which earlier veloc-
ity work would indicate an average velocity in the basin of at least
0.4 feet per second. The main dye peak occurred at a corrected time of
approximately 8 minutes. From this point, the dye concentration dropped
rapidly to a new plateau at approximately 30 minutes and then dropped
gradually after that. Another set of results showed a first peak at a
corrected time of approximately 7 minutes followed by a greater peak at
29 minutes. A once-around flow time at an average velocity of 0.4 feet
per second calculates out to 7.5 minutes. The favorable agreement of the
first peak in both tests strongly indicates a plug flow condition in the
pilot Oxidation Ditch. The second peaks must correspond to the second
circuit of the dye-dosed plug of water, only now the dye is spreading
and so the peak takes longer.
The pilot Aerated Lagoon was being operated at a depth of 7.7 feet and a
theoretical detention time of 7.0 days. The power input during the dye
tests was less than 0.01 net hp/1000 gallons, for which earlier velocity
work would indicate an average velocity in the basin of less than 0.3
feet per second. A principal dye peak occurred at a corrected time of
approximately 8 to 9.5 minutes depending upon the test. A second peak
showed up after a lag and could be interpreted as a cycle time due to
liquid motion caused by the aerator rotation, but by a second cycle the
basin influent would become well mixed with the existing contents. The
dye then tailed out over a period of many hours. Such results as were
obtained do favor interpretation of a well mixed condition in the pilot
Aerated Lagoon after the initial cycle.
-------
Results from dye studies on the Trickling Filters were analyzed to find
an "n" value to be used in the data modeling (7). The corrected peak
dye times through both filters were normalized with respect to column
height and a log-log slope was determined. The data were as follows:
Corrected Sampling Hydraulic Normalized Time
Peak Time Depth Loading (Minutes per
(minutes^ (feet) (gpd/sf) Foot of Depth)
1.36 24 3150 0.057
2.90 24 3000 0.121
0.30 16 6000 0.019 X
0.70 16 3150 0.044 X
0.70 16 3000 0.044 X
0.24 8 4300 0.031 X
0.32 8 3150 0.041 X
0.35 8 3000 0.044 X
The line of best fit for these results fairly well satisfies the values
indicated with an "X" (see FIGURE 7, page 38). The "n" for this range of
hydraulic loadings is therefore found to be 1.20. Such a value is much
larger than others have reported for similar media (7); however, the
hydraulic loadings are also quite large. It is concluded that "n" is not
only a direct function of hydraulic loading but is also dependent upon
absolute loading rate.
The two clarifiers were also dosed with dye during these tests. A peak
in Clarifier 1 occurred 30 to 45 minutes after the dye was injected. The
theoretical detention time under test flow conditions was 4.1 hours, thus
indicating some short circuiting. Likewise in Clarifier 2, the dye peak
occurred at 18 to 36 minutes when the theoretical detention time was 1.8
hours.
Aeration Basin Oxygen Uptake Rates
Oxygen uptake rates were determined during the last phase of the project
when black liquor was being added to the pilot feed.
Initially only oxygen decay and temperature were recorded on the samples
with time. After the procedure was developed, several sets of data were
obtained for samples taken at varying depths at six points in the pilot
Aerated Lagoon. The suspended solids and volatile suspended solids of
the mixed liquor contents in the lagoon were also determined.
The initial data showed oxygen uptake rates in the pilot Oxidation Ditch
of 3.8 to 6.7 mg/1/hour, in the Trickling Filter effluents of slightly
greater than 1.0 mg/1/hour uptake, and approximately 2.8 mg/1/hour uptake
in the pilot Aerated Lagoon. The more complete data taken in the pilot
Aerated Lagoon are shown in TABLE 28 (page 103) from which several conclu-
sions can be made as follows.
99
-------
The Aerated Lagoon contents appear fairly well mixed in the areas and
depths sampled, as indicated by the almost random location of the highest
solids value in each test and also as indicated, especially in the case
of volatile suspended solids, the close agreement of all values in each
test with minor exception.
The oxygen uptake rate under similar test conditions on different days
appears to vary by more than 2.0 mg/1/hour. A greater uptake is calcu-
lated from the first hour's data than if the test proceeds for more than
2 hours. The overall range of oxygen uptake rates in this test series
is seen to be 2.4 to 4.9 mg/1/hour based on the first 60 minute values
in each determination.
Sludge Volume Index
Biological content sludge from OD and TF1 was settled continuously in
the two pilot Clarifiers and the sludge was recycled for the majority
of the test periods. The suspended solids content of both sludges was
found to be quite variable with extremes of 0.1 percent and 1.8 per-
cent being encountered.
An indicator of sludge settleability is the sludge volume index (SVI)
which relates the volume occupied by the settled sludge to the weight
of the suspended solids in this sludge.
The average SVl's for all test periods in which such information was
taken are shown in TABLE 29 (page 104) along with clarifier loading rates
and detention times. It should be noted that the sludge volume index was
always below 100. Settleability of these sludges was quite good.
Results of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Levels After Treatment
Throughout the project the Main Clarifier effluent (MC) was tested for
existing nutrient content before setting the feed rate for addition of
aqua ammonia and phosphoric acid. At the end of every 6 months or
"Project Quarter" the rate was adjusted to compensate for existing levels
and still maintain a proportion of 5 pounds of ammonia nitrogen and
1 pound of phosphate phosphorus for every 100 pounds of applied BOD,.
(i.e., 100:5:1 for BOD5:N:P).
The mill clarified effluent with the additional nutrients added was then
designated Pilot Feed or PF and was also tested for final nutrient con-
tent. TABLE 30 (page 105) shows the results of testing for total and
soluble forms of nitrate nitrogen, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, ammonia
nitrogen, and phosphate phosphorus on both MC and PF by Project Quarter.
As can be noted in this TABLE, the most nutrients were added in the
fourth Project Quarter, which was when the black liquor was being added
to the MC for this project.
100
-------
TABLES 31 and 32 (pages 106 and 107) contain a similar summary of the
total and soluble nutrient forms still remaining in the TF1 and TF2
effluents after biological treatment. TABLE 33 (page 108) contains
the results from the pilot Aerated Lagoon and TABLE 34 (page 109)
contains pilot Oxidation Ditch results. Selected test conditions
are included in all four TABLES for the reader's benefit.
The very significant finding of this work is that high residual nutrient
levels still remained in the treated effluent when original dosages of
100:5:1 were provided. Future work should be directed toward the optimi-
zation of nutrient dosages so that a minimum cost for nutrients will be
paid and a minimum residual nutrient level will be discharged.
Chemical and Power Costs for Pilot Plant Operation
The chemicals used during the project were aqua ammonia (26°Be),
phosphoric acid (75 percent) and Hodag FD-62 defoamer (10 percent active).
Ammonia as nitrogen (N) was sixteen cents per pound and the phosphoric
acid as phosphorus (P) was forty-five cents per pound for the quantities
used in this project.
TABLE 35 (page HO) shows that over the entire project the nitrogen cost
an average of approximately one cent and the phosphorus about one-half
cent for every pound of applied BOD . TABLES 36, 37, 38, and 39
(pages HI through 114) show the actual pounds of N and P required for
each pound of BOD removed for each test on the four pilot units,
respectively.
On TF1, the pounds of N ranged from 0.047 to 0.110 with an average of
0.079 pounds per pound BOD removed. The pounds of P ranged from 0.008
to 0.022 with an average or 0.014.
The TF2 unit showed a wider range from 0.085 to 0.684 pounds N required
with an average of 0.176 pounds N per pound of BOD removed. The P ranged
from 0.015 to 0.145 pounds with an average of 0.033 pounds.
On AL the range was 0.051 to 0.130 pounds of N per pound of BOD removed
with an average of 0.085 pounds. The P ranged from 0.008 to 0.026 with
an average of 0.016 pounds required.
The OD required an average of 0.054 -pounds N with a range of 0,036 to
0.079 pounds per pound removed BOD . An average of 0.009 pounds of P
was required with a range from 0.006 to 0.016 pounds.
The average nutrient usage can be summarized as follows:
Unit
Ibs usage/lb
Nitrogen
0.079
0.176
0.085
0.079
101
BOD removed
Phosphorus
0.014
0.033
0.016
0.009
-------
It should be noted that TF1 with sludge recycle "consumed" only half the
nutrients required for comparable operation in the conventional TF2 with
filtrate recycle. Furthermore, nutrient usage rate in TF1 based on
removed BOD5 is similar to the rate required in AL. Of the four units
on the average, OD consumed the least total nutrients, while TF2 consumed
the most.
The relative usage rates would be economically important if, in optimiza-
tion, the actual addition rates could be adjusted in the same proportion.
Using bulk prices of three cents per pound for N and fifteen cents per
pound for P, the nitrogen cost was approximately 0.2 cents and the phos-
phorus 0.17 cents for each pound of applied BOD over the entire project.
The defoamer was supplied at a cost of 52 cents per pound. Approximately
700 pounds were used during the project, resulting in a total cost of
$364.00 for defoamer. The bulk of this addition occurred during the
final four months when black liquor was being added to PF. (See the
Operation Procedures in SECTION IX.)
The power cost shown in TABLE 35 included the aerators, all pumps,
sample timers and lights. The electricity used in the pilot plant per
pound of applied BOD,, ranged from 1.1 to 1.8 kilowatt hours (KWH).
At 1.5 cents per KWH, the electrical cost for this operation ranged from
1.7 cents to 2.7 cents per pound of applied BOD,..
102
-------
TEST POINT LOCATION IN PILOT AERATION BASINS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
5.7'
II
IT
.5'
13.5'
N*
(7) *o/<
35
II'
c
ii'
B
(5) Cs) C
-x
(8)
Aerator'
Overflow
N
Plan View Of Pilot Aerated Lagoon
64' SQUARE
a
Variable
41 SQUARE
Profile View Of Pilot Aerated Lagoon
•N
Plan View Of Pilot Oxidation Ditch
103
FIGURE 24
-------
POWER LOADINGS AND BOD REMOVALS IN AERATION BASINS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Test
I.D.
Volume
(gallons)
Deten.
Time
(days)
TURBINE AERATOR OPERATION WITH
AL-1
AL-2
AL-3
AL-4
133,400
133,400
133,400
133.400
2.3
1.5
3.0
2.3
TURBINE AERATOR OPERATION WITH
AL-5
AL-6
AL-7
AL-8
AL-9
AL-10
AL-11
AL-12
AL-13
BRUSH
OD-1
OD-2
BRUSH
OD-3
OD-4
OD-5
OD-6
OD-7
OD-8
OD-9
OD-10
133,400
133.400
133,400
162,300
100,500
162,300
100,500
88,500
162,300
3.8
3.0
2.3
1.4
1.7
3.5
1.7
1.8
7.0
Net
hp
Net
hp/1000 gal.
UNSETTLED EFFLUENT
1.74
1.74
1.74
1.74
SETTLED
0.94
0.94
0.94
1.07
0.40
0.94
0.64
1.00
0.95
AERATOR OPERATION WITH UNSETTLED
152,000
157,500
AERATOR WITH
157,500
90,000
90,000
117,000
117,000
193,000
96,000
96,000
3.0
2.0
1.88
2.68
SETTLED EFFLUENT AND
1.0
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.01
0.93
0.93
2.01
2.14
2.41
2.09
2.27
0.013
0.013
0.013
0.013
EFFLUENT
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.007
0.004
0.006
0.006
0.011
0.006
EFFLUENT
0.012
0.017
SLUDGE RETURN
0.013
0.010
0.010
0.017
0.018
0.013
0.022
0.024
Pounds BOD
Removed per
Net hp/hr
1.8
2.0
0.7
0.9
2.3
2.8
3.4
2.5
5.3
5.3
4.4
1.4
1.1
5.0
4.8
2.9
3.7
1.8
2.3
4.0
1.5
TABLE 21 104
-------
DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND TEMPERATURE IN PILOT AERATED LAGOON
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Dissolved Oxygen in mg/1 and Temperature in °C
TEST POINTS (See Sketch Below)
Location
8
10
Effluent
POWER LEVEL GREATER THAN 0.02 NET HP/1000 GALLONS (Depth 6.7 ft.)
1.0 ft. - 3.0@30° 3.0@300 3.0@30°
Middepth - 3.0@30° 3.0@30° 3.0@30°
Bottom - 2.8@30° 2.9@30° 2.9@30°
1.0 ft.
Middepth
Bottom
1.0 ft.
Middepth
Bottom
1.6@31° 1.4@31°
1.6@31° 1.4631°
1.6@310 1.4@31°
1.4@32° 1.4@32°
1.5@32° 1.4@32°
1.6(3.32° 1.4032°
1.5@31°
1.5@31°
1.4@31°
1.4@320
1.6@32°
1.7632°
1.7@31C
1.6@32e
POWER LEVEL GREATER THAN 0.01 NET HP/1000 GALLONS (Depth 6.7 ft.)
1.0 ft. 7.0@220 7.1822° 7.2@22° 6.0@22° 6.5@23° 5.5@22°
Middepth 6.6@22° 6.8@22° 7.0@22° 6.7(322° 6.4@22°
Bottom 6.5@22° 6.7@22° 6.9@22° 6.7@22° 6.4@22°
1.0 ft. 4.6@26°
Middepth 4.6@26°
Bottom 4.6@26°
1.0 ft. 3.6@280
Middepth 3.6@28°
Bottom 3.6@280
1.0 ft. 2.5@27°
Middepth 2.5@27°
Bottom 2.5@27°
4.6@26°
4.6@26°
4.5@26°
3.4@28°
3.5@28°
3.6@28°
2.5@27°
2.4@27°
2.4@27°
4.6@260
4.5@260
4.5@26°
3.5@28°
3.5@28°
3.5@28°
2.4@270
2.4@27°
2.4@27°
4.6@26°
4.6@26°
4.3@260
3.4@280
3.5@280
3.4@280
2.4@270
2.4@27°
2.4@270
4.4@26°
4.4@26°
4.3@260
3.6@280
3.6@280
3.6@280
2.5@27°
2.5@27°
2.5@27°
POWER LEVEL LESS THAN 0.01 NET HP/1000 GALLONS
2.0 ft.
0.2@200 0.2(321° 0.2020'
Basin Depth is 7.7 ft.
2.0 ft.
0.4(3.21° 0.4(321° 0.4@21{
Basin depth is 7.7 ft.
Plan View Qf Pilot Aerated Lagoon
105
4.6@26e
2.5(327'
1.0 ft.
Middepth
6.7 ft.
3.7@28°
3.6@28°
3.6@28°
3.4@28°
3.4(328°
3.4@28°
3.4(328°
3.4@280
3.6@280
3.4(328°
3.4(3.28°
3.4@28°
3.4(§28°
3.4(§28°
3.4@280
3.6
-------
VELOCITIES AND DIRECTIONS IN PILOT AERATED LAGOON
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Velocities in feet/second and Directions as Compass Point Toward
TEST POINTS (See Sketch Below)
Location
Depth
3
POWER LEVEL GREATER
1.0 ft.
2.0 ft.
3.0 ft.
4.0 ft.
5.0 ft.
6.0 ft.
6.7 ft.
0.5E
0.3SSE
0.3SSE
0.3S
0.3S
0.4S
0.'4-
4
5
6
7
8
THAN 0.01 NET HP/ 1000 GALLONS
0.6SE
0.4S
0.5NE
0.5SSE 0.5NW
0.6ESE 0.4SSW 0.3NNE
0.4SSW 0.6SE
0.3SW
0.6SE
0.5SSW 0.4NNE
0.5SSW 0.4NNE
0.3SSW 0.7SSE 0.5SSW 0.4NNE
0.3SSW 0.6SSE 0.5S
0.3-
0.5-
0.4-
0.5NNE
0.4-
0.4W
0.4N
0.4NNE
0.4NNE
0.4N
0.4N
0.4-
POWER LEVEL LESS THAN 0.01 NET HP/1000 GALLONS
1.0 ft.
2.0 ft.
3.0 ft.
4.0 ft.
5.0 ft.
6.0 ft.
6.7 ft.
1.0 ft.
2.0 ft.
3.0 ft.
4.0 ft.
5.0 ft.
6.0 ft.
7.0 ft.
7.7 ft.
1.0 ft.
2.0 ft.
3.0 ft.
4.0 ft.
5.0 ft.
6.0 ft.
7.7 ft.
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.2
0.2
0.1
trace
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.1
0
0
0
sludge
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.3
0
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.1
trace
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.6
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.6
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.2
trace 0.1
sludge sludge trace
0.5
0.5
trace
trace
trace trace
trace
trace
trace trace
sludge 0
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.5
trace 0.5
E 0
CD © y
*
/
Acrotor
0.6
0.6
0.2
0.1
0.6
0.6
0.1
0.1
trace trace
trace trace
0
0
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.3
C 8 A
© CD ©
.Owtrflow
trace
sludge
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
trace
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.1
trace
trace
trace
sludge
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.3
0.1
Plan View Of Pilot Aerated Lagoon
TABLE 23
106
-------
HISTORY OF SLUDGE BUILDUP IN PILOT AERATED LAGOON
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
___^__ TEST POINTS (See Sketch Below)
Situation 3456
Lagoon Filled (6-6-68)
POWER LEVEL GREATER THAN 0.01 NET HP/1000 GALLONS
Test AL-2 (8-28-68)
Basin Depth 6.7 ft.
Sludge Depth (inches) 0-1 0-1 0-1 0-1
Test AL-4 (11-5-68)
Basin Depth 6.7 ft.
Sludge Depth (inches) trace
0
0
POWER LEVEL LESS THAN 0.01 NET HP/1000 GALLONS
Test AL-7 (5-6-69)
Basin Depth 6.7 ft.
Sludge Depth (inches) 330
Test AL-10 (9-30-69)
Basin Depth 7.7 ft.
Sludge Depth (inches) 6
Lagoon Emptied (10-11-69)
Lagoon Filled (10-14-69)
Test AL-13 (3-24-70)
Basin Depth 7.7 ft.
Sludge Depth (inches) 15
Sludge Solids (%) 12.2
Volatile Content 31%
Test AL-13 (4-28-70)
Basin Depth 7.7 ft.
Sludge Depth (inches) 16
Sludge Solids (%) 11j1
Volatile Content 31%
8 Average
0-1 0-1 <1 in.
0.3 in.
12
12.9
30%
3.2 in.
2.5 in.
18
11.0
29%
3
0.0
-
4
0.0
-
19
18.0
26%
16
14.3
31%
12.5 in.
1 1 10 9 8.2 in.
8.7 8.7 10.7 12.7
38% 36% 29% 33%
(10) (8)
CD8©*
®
Plan View Of Pilot Aerated Lagoon
107
TABLE 24
-------
DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND TEMPERATURE IN PILOT DITCH
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Dissolved Oxygen in mg/1 and Temperature in °C
TEST POINTS (See Sketch Below)
Location
Depth
1.0 ft.
2.0 ft.
3.0 ft.
1
4.7@290
4.2(329°
4.3@29°
3
4.4@290
4.4@290
4.5(329°
8
5.1@290
5.0@29°
5.0@29°
10
5.0@29°
5.0@290
4.9@29°
Basin Depth is 6.7 ft.
1.0 ft. 3.2<§30° 3.2@30° 2.9@30° 2.9@30°
Middepth 3.2@30° 3.2(330° 2.9@30° 2.9@30°
Bottom 3.0@300 3.0(330° 2.9(330° 2.9(330°
Basin Depth is 6.7 ft.
1.0 ft. 2.5(332° 2.5@320 2.0@32° 2.0@32°
Middepth 2.5@320 2.5(332° 2.0@32° 2.0@32°
Bottom 2.4@320 2.4@32° 2.0@32° 2.0@32°
Basin Depth is 6.7 ft.
1.0 ft.
Middepth
Bottom
Basin Depth is 6.7 ft.
1.0 ft.
Middepth
Bottom
Basin Depth is 7.0 ft.
1.0 ft.
Middepth
Bottom
Basin Depth is 7.0 ft.
POWER LEVEL IN ALL TESTS WAS APPROXIMATELY 0.015 NET HP/1000 GALLONS
0.4@300
0.3@300
0.5@30°
0.6@300
0.5@ 30°
0.6@30°
0.1@300
0.1@300
0.1(330°
0.2@300
0.1(330°
0.1(330°
1.7(332°
1.6@32°
1.6@32°
1.8@320
1.8@32°
1.8(§320
1.5632°
1.5@32°
1.4@32°
1.6@320
1.5@32°
1.5@32°
1.2@32°
1.1@320
1.0@32°
1.3@32°
1.2@320
1.2@32°
0.9(332°
0.9@32°
1.0@32°
0.9(332°
0.9@32°
1.0@32°
Plon View Of Pilot Oxidation Diteh
TABLE 25 108
-------
VELOCITIES IN PILOT OXIDATION DITCH
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Velocities in feet/second
TEST POINTS (See Sketch Below)
Location
Pep th
POWER LEVEL
1.0 ft.
2.0 ft.
3.0 ft.
4.0 ft.
5.0 ft.
6.0 ft.
7.0 ft.
8.0 ft.
Basin Depth
1.0 ft.
2.0 ft.
3.0 ft.
4.0 ft.
5.0 ft.
6.0 ft.
6.7 ft.
Basin Depth
1.0 ft.
2.0 ft.
3.0 ft.
4.0 ft.
5.0 ft.
Basin Depth
1.0 ft.
2.0 ft.
3.0 ft.
4.0 ft.
Basin Depth
tr = trace
1
2
3
SLIGHTLY GREATER
1.2
1.2
0.1
0.1
0.5
0
0
0
is 8.
1.9
0.9
0.5
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.5
is 6.
1.5
1.5
1.0
tr
tr
is 5.
1.1
0.9
0.7
1.2
1.1
1.0
tr
0.4
0
0
0
6 ft.
1.4
0.9
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.4
7 feet
1.5
0.9
0.9
tr
tr
2 ft.
1.2
0.8
0.5
sludge 0.2
is 4.
0 ft.
(©
®
(3)
•
®
1.1
0.1
tr
tr
0.1
0
0
0
0.7
0.6
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.7
0.6
0.6
tr
tr
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.1
Ov«rf!o«
X
_F1«__
4
THAN
0.3
tr
tr
tr
0.1
0
0
0
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.6
0.6
0.4
tr
tr
0.7
0.6
0.4
0.1
d> ~-
5
0.01 NET
1.3
1.0
tr
tr
tr
0
0
0
1.1
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.3
1.6
1.3
0.7
0.1
tr
1.3
1.1
1.0
0.3
1 ® X
Hi^@
®"^"
6
7
8
9
10
11
HP/1000 GALLONS
1.1
0.1
tr
tr
0.1
0
0
0
1.3
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.2
0.3
1.5
0.8
0.2
tr
tr
1.3
0.9
0.5
0.2
^FlOw
0.5
0.1
0.1
tr
0.1
0
0
0
0.6
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.4
0.3
0.4
tr
tr
0.8
0.4
0.3
0.1
)
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.4
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.9
0.9
0.5
0.1
tr
0.7
0.7
0.7
sludge
0.5
0.3
0.1
tr
0
0
0
0
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.7
0.5
0.3
tr
tr
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.2
tr
tr
tr
tr
0
0
0
0
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.5
0.7
0.6
tr
tr
0.4
0.4
0.3
0.2
tr
tr
tr
0
0
0
0
0
0.6
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.5
0.5
0.3
0.8
0.8
0.1
tr
tr
0.5
0.4
0.2
sludge
Plon View Of Pilot Oxidation Ditch
109
TABLE 26
-------
SUMMARY OF AVERAGE BOD FRACTIONS AND COD RATIOS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Influent Organic Influent Organics(mg/l) Effluent Organics(mg/l)
System Source
DATA
TF1
TF2
AL
OD
DATA
TF1
TF2
AL
OD
DATA
TF1
TF1
TF2
AL
AL
OD
OD
FROM MAY,
PF
TF1
PF
PF
Test
1969 WHEN
BOD
BOD;?
BOD;?
BOD;?
FROM OCTOBER, 1969
PF
OD
PF
PF
BOD
BOD;!
BOD;!
BOD^
OF MARCH-MAY, 1970
OD
TF2
PF
TF2
PF
TF2
TF1
BOD
COD
Ratio
BOD
COD
Ratio
BOD
COD"3
Ratio
BOD
COD
Ratio
BOD
COD
Ratio
BOD
COD
Ratio
BOD
COD
Ratio
Mixed Settled
PILOT FEED WAS
198
80
198
198
Filtered
PF(2)
140
24
140
140
Mixed Settled
80
165 50
86 32
30
Filtered
24
18
4
11
WHEN PILOT FEED WAS PF(3)
174
22
174
174
126
9
126
126
48
30 21
88 22
22
15
8
1
9
WHEN PILOT FEED WAS PF(BL)
74
718
9.7:1
392 370
1613
4.4:1
626
1927
3.1:1
515 503
1893
3.8:1
626
1927
3.1:1
515 503
1893
3.8:1
277
1599
5.8:1
_
—
_
—
_
_
_
-
_
_
_
-
_
-
59
661
11.2:1
277
- 1599
5.8:1
449 420
- 1718
4.1:1
111 101
831
8.2:1
91
- 1088
11.9:1
74
- 718
9.7:1
95
902
9.5:1
_
—
210*
996*
4.7:1
*
*
6.1:1
_
-
_
-
_
-
_
-
*Different sampling dates from other values in averages.
TABLE 27
110
-------
_ (5)
Atrotor
Plan View Of Pilot Aerated Lagoon
OXYGEN UPTAKE DETERMINATIONS IN PILOT AERATED LAGOON
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
w
f
w
TEST POINTS (see Sketch) 3
DEPTH 1 foot
May 17, 1970 SAMPLES OF CONTENTS
Suspended Solids (mg/1) 496
Volatile Susp. Solids (mg/1) 342
Average Test Temp. (°C) 24.4
0 Uptake Rate (mg/l/hr.)
First 60 min. of test 4.2
105 min. of test 3.8
May^ 21> 197° SAMPLES OF CONTENTS
Suspended Solids (mg/1) 620*
Volatile Susp. Solids (mg/1) 487*
Average Test Temp. (°C) 24.7
0 Uptake Rate (mg/l/hr.)
First 60 min. of test 3.3
135 min. of test 2.8
May 28^ 1970 SAMPLES OF CONTENTS
Suspended Solids (mg/1) 672*
Volatile Susp. Solids (mg/1) 551*
Average Test Temp. (°C) 22.8
0 Uptake Rate (mg/l/hr.)
First 60 min. of test 2.7
135 min. of test 2.5*
May 29, 1970 SAMPLES OF CONTENTS
Suspended Solids (mg/1) 720*
Volatile Susp. Solids (mg/1) 446
Average Test Temp. (°C) 23.8
0 Uptake Rate (mg/l/hr.)
First 60 min. of test 2.5
135 min. of test 2.3
* indicates highest value of stated
4
6 feet
460
354
24.7
4.7
4.0
600
444
24.5
3.2
2.9
588
507
22.8
2.6
2.4
688
447
24.0
2.5
2.5
parameter
5
2 feet 5
516*
335
24.3
4.9*
4.2*
'
588
411
25.6
3.5*
3.2*
620
540
22.8
2.7
2.5*
700*
463
24.0
2.6*
2.5
in given test.
6
feet
488
351
24.1
4.4
3.8
460
300
24.5
3.3
2.9
652
525
22.6
2.5
2.2
720
467
23.9
2.4
2.4
7
3 feet
396
356
24.1
4.5
3.7
600
416
24.8
3.2
2.9
580
532
22.9
2.8*
2.4
708
445
23.9
2.6*
2.6*
8
4 feet
456
456*
24.1
4.4
3.8
588
440
24.5
3.1
2.9
632
528
22.9
2.6
2.4
656
472*
23.9
2.5
2.4
00
-------
SUMMARY OF SLUDGE VOLUME INDEX ON PILOT CLARIFIERS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Test
I.D.
CLARIFIER
TF1-8
TF1-9
TF1-10
TF1-11
TF1-12
TF1-13
TF1-14
TF1-15
TF1-18
CLARIFIER
OD-4
OD-5
OD-6
OD-7
OD-8
OD-9
OD-10
Feed
(gpm)
1 WITH
33.3
44.4
29.6
22.2
33.3
22.2
22.2
14.8
33.3
2 WITH
62.5
31.2
81.0
40.5
66.7
33.3
33.3
Clarifier
Up flow
(gpd/sf)
SLUDGE RECYCLE
588
784
522
392
588
392
392
260
588
SLUDGE RECYCLE
950
494
1230
614
1010
507
507
Deten.
Sludge Solids
Time Settleable
(hours) (ml/l/%hr.)
TO TRICKLING
1.8
1.4
2.1
2.7
1.8
2.7
2.7
4.1
1.8
TO OXIDATION
2.2
4.4
1.7
3.4
2.0
4.1
4.1
FILTER 1
375
400
79
155
540
850
37
915
30
DITCH
23
272
520
580
785
20
72
Suspended
(mg/1)
8896
14055
2890
7956
15670
18071
991
16190
7567
1227
4984
5491
9474
7897
932
2162
SVI
42
29
27
19
35
47
37
57
4
19
54
95
61
99
22
33
TABLE 29
112
-------
SUMMARY OF NUTRIENT TEST RESULTS ON MILL CLARIFIER AND PILOT FEED
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Project NC) .N Kjeld-N NH -N PC>A-P
Quarter (mg/1) (mg/1) (% Soluble) (mg/1) ^% Soluble) (mg/1) (% Soluble)
MILL CLARIFIED EFFLUENT BEFORE NUTRIENT ADDITION
1 0.3 5.9 44 1.0 70 0.7 14
2 0.5 4.6 33 0.9 78 0.6 50
3 0.3 4.7 43 0.5 60 0.4 50
4 0.8 6.0 63 1.5 80 1.3 85
PILOT FEED (MILL CLARIFIED EFFLUENT WITH NUTRIENTS ADDED)
1 0.3 13.9 76 7.2 88 1.7 59
2 - 16.8 - 9.8 - 3.3 79
3 - 22.5 - 10.9 - 2.8 82
4(BL) - 40.0 - 24.1 - 8.4 92
TABLE 30
113
-------
I
tr1
W
TOTAL AND SOLUBLE NUTRIENT TEST RESULTS ON TRICKLING FILTER 1
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Test Conditions
Recycle
Test To Feed
I. P. Ratio
TF1-1
TF1-2
TF1-3
TF1-4
TF1-5
TF1-6
TF1-7
TF1-8
TF1-9
TF1-10
TF1-11
TF1-12
TF1-13*
TF1-14
TF1-15
TF1-16
TF1-17*
TF1-18*
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
0:1
0:1
1:1
0.5:1
0.5:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
5:1
0:1
0:1
1:1
Hydraulic
Loading
(gpd/sf)
4000
6000
8000
2000
4000
2660
1330
6000
6000
4000
4000
6000
4000
4000
8000
6000
3000
6000
NO -N
Nutrient Results
K1eld-N
(mj/l) (mg/1)
-
-
-
0.4
0.5
0.4
—
0.7
0.5
0.4
_
—
0.4
0.3
0.4
0.3
0.6
7
18
9
9
13
15
—
8
12
15
15
10
23
17
10
17
32
29
.9
.1
.5
.8
.6
.4
.7
.4
.9
.7
.4
.1
.9
.2
.1
.9
.1
NH-r-N PO/.-P
(% Soluble) (me/lT(% Solubxel (me/1)
43
-
10
61
67
69
-
62
52
33
67
49
77
59
39
75
59
66
2.1
5.1
2.8
3.9
5.0
6.3
5.8
2.1
3.4
4.9
9.1
3.7
14.9
7.1
1.9
7.8
12.2
9.1
57
-
18
59
-
99
86
76
91
78
96
81
97
93
90
100
97
92
0
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
2
1
3
4
5
1
2
6
5
.6
.4
.0
.6
.5
.5
.2
.5
.6
.6
.6
.2
.1
.1
.3
.2
.4
.4
(% Soluble)
»
-
80
50
40
74
59
60
56
69
88
78
86
81
85
82
86
83
* Designates special feed source.
-------
v_n
TOTAL AND SOLUBLE NUTRIENT TEST RESULTS ON TRICKLING FILTER 2
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Test Conditions
Recycle
Test To Feed
I.D. Ratio
TF2-1 1:1
TF2-2 0:1
TF2-3 0:1
TF2-4 1:1
TF2-5 2:1
TF2-6 2:1
TF2-7 1:1
TF2-8 1:1
TF2-9 0.5:1
TF2-10 0.5:1
TF2-11* 1:1
TF2-12 1:1
TF2-13 1:1
TF2-14* 1:1
TF2-15* 0:1
TF2-16 0:1
TF2-17* 0:1
TF2-18* 1:1
Hydraulic
Loading
(gpd/sf)
4000
2000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
6000
6000
4000
4000
6000
4000
4000
6000
6000
6000
6000
Nutrient Results
NO_-N
j
(mg/1)
—
-
-
0.3
0.4
0.5
-
0.6
0.4
0.3
—
-
0.4
0.9
0.3
0.6
0.7
Kjeld-N NH
(mg/1) i
7.8
19.4
9.9
13.4
15.7
14.3
—
12.3
14.1
13.6
11.4
16.0
24.3
12.3
5.1
35.4
43.0
34.7
f% Soluble)
60
39
59
51
31
48
-
36
64
54
45
47
69
42
63
72
90
84
(mg/1) (i
1.9
4.9
2.6
3.4
3.6
6.8
6.6
2.7
4.1
5.2
4.0
5.8
14.2
3.2
0.7
12.4
24.3
18.5
»-N
I Soluble)
_
70
54
83
33
93
-
74
81
87
85
88
92
94
86
93
95
96
PO
(mg/1) i
0.8
1.8
2.0
1.8
2.0
1.8
1.9
1.7
1.9
2.3
1.7
3.1
3.4
3.8
0.8
3.7
6.7
7.3
i~P
(% Soluble)
50
44
10
28
20
28
32
94
84
44
88
58
94
84
50
79
91
92
* Designates special feed source.
US
to
-------
i
r
M
Co
TOTAL AND SOLUBLE NUTRIENT TEST RESULTS ON AERATED LAGOON
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Test Conditions
Test
I.D.
AL-1
AL-2
AL-3
AL-4
AL-5
AL-6
AL-7
AL-8*
AL-9*
AL-10
AL-11*
AL-12*
AL-13*
Deten. Organic
Nutrient Results
Time Loading NO,-N
(davs) (ood/lOOOcf ) (me/I")
2.3
1.5
3.0
2.3
3.8
3.0
2.3
1.4
1.7
3.5
1.7
1.8
7.0
5.0
7.3
3.6
5.3
3.6
3.8
5.0
1.1
0.4
2.3
6.2
12.1
3.4
—
1.2
1.3
1.3
1.2
0.7
—
0.6
0.9
0.7
0.4
0.4
Kjeld-N
NH0-N
PO,
(mg/1) (% Soluble) (me/1) (%'Soluble} (me/1) ?
10.5
17.3
13.3
15.4
14.5
15.3
20.7
7.6
10.8
10.6
17.0
26.3
49.0
59
24
30
34
58
48
43
38
76
42
65
46
68
1.3
1.3
1.4
1.7
5.7
4.5
6.6
1.5
5.0
0.9
4.8
7.4
25.1
100
100
57
71
88
91
100
73
94
100
92
97
97
1.1
1.7
2.4
1.7
1.2
2.3
2.4
2.3
2.2
1.8
2.3
4.6
7.1
-P
% Soluble)
27
6
25
41
75
78
83
87
96
72
74
91
78
*Designates special feed source.
-------
TOTAL AND SOLUBLE NUTRIENT TEST RESULTS ON OXIDATION DITCH
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Test Conditions
Deten. Organic
Test Time Loading NO -N
I.D. (days) (ppd/lOOOcf) (mg/1)
OXIDATION
OD-1
OD-2
OXIDATION
OD-3
OD-4
OD-5
OD--6
OD-7
OD-8
OD-9*
OD-10*
DITCH
3
2
DITCH
1
1
2
1
2
2
2
2
WITHOUT CLARIFIC
4.4
6.2
WITH
12.7
15.4
6.5
12.4
6.2
6.0
13.3
8.5
—
—
Nutrient Results
Kjeld-N NHr-N
(mg/1) (
AT ION
10.0
11.4
PO/.-P
% Soluble) (mg/1) v% Soluble) (mg/1) (% Soluble)
_
37
1.8
2.0
_
100
1.1
2.6
_
—
CLARIFICATION
1.2
1.2
0.9
—
0.6
0.5
0.7
1.3
5.0
15.3
14.4
4.6
4.4
6.8
20.0
17.8
_
43
71
50
64
81
40
41
0.7
3.5
8.5
1.8
0.3
1.8
3.9
3.0
100
60
94
72
67
100
87
87
0.7
1.4
2.0
2.4
2.4
0.7
6.0
6.8
71
43
90
94
50
72
79
90
*Designates special feed source.
M
OJ
-------
g
r
w
UJ
SUMMARY OF
CHEMICAL AND POWER COSTS FOR TOTAL
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological
PILOT FEED
Project
Quarter
1
2
3
4
Avg
.Flow
MGD
0.
0.
0.
0.
232
219
175
084
Avg.
mg/1
202
221
236
515
BODr
Ib/lJay
384
398
354
361
Avg
NITROGEN*
.Ibs.
N/Day
17
15
12
19
.1
.3
.0
.0
Cost/lb.
Applied BOD
$ 0.010
$ 0.008
$ 0.013
$ 0.013
PILOT PLANT OPERATION
Treatment)
PHOSPHORUS*
Avg. Ibs .
P/Day
3.4
2.3
2.0
3.8
Cost/lb.
Applied BOD
$ 0.005
$ 0.007
$ 0.006
$ 0.007
ELECTRICAL USAGE
Applied
KWH/lb
1.10
1.34
1.30
1.77
BODr
Cost/lb
$ 0.017
$ 0.020
$ 0.020
$ 0.027
* Desired ratio was 100:5:1, BOD:N:P. Addition was adjusted during 2nd and 3rd Quarters to allow
for existing nutrient concentration in the pilot feed wastewater.
1st Quarter: Added 9.0 mg/1 of NH -N and 1.8 mg/1 of P = 100:4.5:0.9 True Ratio
2nd Quarter: Added 8.5 mg/1 of ffld-N and 1.3 mg/1 of P = 100:3.9:0.6 True Ratio
3rd Quarter: Added 8.0 mg/1 of NH^-N and 1.3 mg/1 of P = 100:3.4:0.6 True Ratio
4th Quarter: Added 27.0 mg/1 of NH -N and 5.4 mg/1 of P = 100:5.2:1.1 True Ratio
Electrical costs based on $0.015 per kilowatt hour
Chemical costs based on actual supply for project as follows: NH -N was $0.16 per pound-
PO, was $0.45 per pound. 3 '
Full scale chemical costs should be lower in bulk quantities.
-------
g
f
W
u>
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL USAGE ON TRICKLING FILTER WITH SLUDGE RECYCLE
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TEST mNDTTTONS EU1TJSU XJSST RESULTS
Test
Recycle
to Feed
Ratio
TRICKLING FILTER
TF1-7
TF1-6
TF1-17
TF1-10
TF1-9
TF1-4
TF1-1
TF1-5
TF1-11
TF1-14
TF1-13
TF1-2
TF1-8
TF1-12
TF1-18
TF1-3
TF1-15
0:1
0:1
0:1
0.5:1
0.5:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
5:1
Hydraulic
Loading Height
(gpd/sf) (feet)
TESTS WITH SLUDGE
1330
2660
3000
4000
6000
2000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
6000
6000
6000
6000
8000
8000
22
22
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
System
Feed
RECYCLE
PF(2)
PF(1)
OD(BL)
PF(2)
PF(2)
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(3)
TF2(3)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(2)
TF2(BL)
PF(1)
PF(3)
Organic Lb.N/Lb
Loading Applied
(ppd/1000 cf) BOD,
90
180
90
190
300
70
140
125
140
140
110
230
280
200
420
250
90
_;
0.045
0.045
-
0.039
0.039
0.045
0.045
0.045
0.039
0.034
-
0.045
0.039
0.039
-
0.045
0.034
. Lb.P/Lb. Lb.N/Lb.
Applied Removed
BOD „ BOD r
j
0.009
0.009
-
0.006
0.006
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.006
0.006
-
0.009
0.006
0.006
-
0.009
0.006
_»
0.087
0.094
-
0.105
0.082
0.057
0.067
0.075
0.057
0.067
-
0.097
0.081
0.082
-
0.110
0.047
Lb.P/Lb.
Removed
BODr
3
0.018
0.019
-
0.016
0.013
0.011
0.013
0.015
0.009
0.012
-
0.019
0.012
0.013
-
0.022
0.008
-------
i
f
w
CO
SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL USAGE ON TRICKLING FILTER WITH FILTRATE RECYCLE
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TEST CONDITIONS
EDITED TEST RESULTS
Test
TRICKLING
TF2-2
TF2-3
TF1-16
TF2-16
TF2-17
TF2-15
TF2-10
TF2-9
TF2-4
TF2-1
TF2-7
TF2-13
TF2-11
TF2-14
TF2-8
TF2-12
TF2-18
TF2-5
TF2-6
Recycle
to Feed
Ratio
FILTER
0:1
0:1
0:1
0:1
0:1
0:1
0.5:1
0.5:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
1:1
2:1
2:1
Hydraulic
Loading
fgpd/sf)
Height
(feet)
TESTS WITH FILTRATE
2000
4000
6000
6000
6000
6000
4000
6000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
4000
6000
6000
6000
4000
4000
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
16
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
16
24
System
Feed
RECYCLE
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(3)
PF(3)
PF(BL)
OD(3)
PF(2)
PF(2)
PF(1)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(3)
TF1(2)
TF1(3)
PF(2)
PF(2)
PF(BL)
PF(1)
PF(1)
Organic
Loading
(ppd/1000 cf'
150
250
590
590
1070
40
190
300
270
140
125
160
55
70
280
195
620
125
80
Lb.N/Lb.
Applied
BODr
5
0.045
0.045
0.034
0.034
0.052
0.039
0.039
0.045
0.045
0.045
0.039
0.039
0.039
0.052
0.045
0.045
Lb.P/Lb.
Applied
BODC
5
0.009
0.009
0.006
0.006
0.011
0.006
0.006
0.009
0.009
0.009
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.011
0.009
0.009
Lb.N/Lb.
Removed
BOD
5
0.180
0.170
0.110
0.211
0.684
0.125
0.221
0.112
0.085
0.155
0.133
0.099
0.124
0.152
0.109
0.138
Lb.P/Lb.
Removed
BOD
5
0.036
0.035
0.019
0.037
0.145
0.019
0.034
0.022
0.017
0.031
0.020
0.015
0.019
0.032
0.022
0.028
-------
SUMMARY OF AERATED LAGOON CHEMICAL USAGE RESULTS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TEST CONDITIONS
Test
AL-8
AL-2
AL-9
AL-11
AL-12
AL-1
AL-4
AL-7
AL-3
AL-6
AL-10
AL-5
AL-1 3
Deten.
Time
(days)
1.4
1.5
1.7
1.7
1.8
2.3
2.3
2.3
3.0
3.0
3.5
3.8
7.0
Depth
(feet)
7.7
6.7
5.5
5.5
5.0
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
6.7
7.7
6.7
7.7
System
Feed
OD(2-3)
PF(1)
OD(3)
TF1(3)
TF2(BL)
PF(1)
PF(l-2)
PF(2)
PF(1)
PF(2)
PF(3)
PF(2)
PF(BL)
Organic Loading
(ppd/1000cf)
1.1
7.3
0.4
6.2
12.1
5.0
5.3
5.0
3.6
3.8
2.3
3.6
3.4
(F/M Ratio')
0.15
0.37
0.06
0.65
0.59
0.64
0.36
0.30
0.23
0.27
0.07
0.53
0.13
Lb.N/Lb
Applied
BOD,;
'"• • • O
0.045
_
-
_
0.045
0.045
0.039
0.045
0.039
0.034
0.039
0.052
EDITED
TEST RESULTS
. Lb.P/Lb. Lb.N/Lb.
Applied Removed
BOD,- BOD,.
j -
0.009
_
_
_
0.009
0.009
0.006
0.009
0.006
0.006
0.006
0.011
3
0.075
_
_
_
0.065
0.130
0.087
0.103
0.062
0.100
0.051
0.064
Lb.P/Lb
Removed
BODC
D
0.015
—
_
_
0.013
0.026
0.013
0.021
0.009
0.017
0.008
0.014
00
-------
w
W
vo
SUMMARY OF OXIDATION DITCH CHEMICAL USAGE
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
TEST CONDITIONS
Test
OXIDATION
OD-2
OD-1
OXIDATION
OD-4
OD-6
OD-3
OD-5
OD-9
OD-10
OD-7
OD-8
Deten.
Time
(days)
DITCH
2
3
DITCH
1
1
I
2
2
2
2
2
Depth
(feet)
System
Feed
Organic
Loading
(ppd/lOOOcf) (F/M
Ratio)
Lb.N/Lb.
Applied
BODC
EDITED TEST RESULTS
LB.P/Lb.
Applied
BOD,-
3
Lb .N/Lb .
Removed
BOD_
D
Lb.P/Lb.
Removed
BOD
5 "•
TESTS WITHOUT CLARIFICATION
7.0
6.7
TESTS WITH
4.0
5.2
7.0
4.0
4.3
4.3
5.2
8.6
PF(1)
PF(1)
6.2
4.4
CLARIFICATION AND
PF(2)
PF(2-3)
PF(l-2)
PF(2)
TF2(BL)
TFl(BL)
PF(3)
PF(3)
15.4
12.4
12.7
6.5
13.3
8.5
6.2
6.0
0.
0.
36
44
0.045
0.045
0.009
0.009
0
0
.079
.067
0.016
0.013
SLUDGE RECYCLE
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
04
14
33
04
33
09
06
05
0.039
0.039
0.045
0.039
-
-
0.034
0.034
0.006
0.006
0.009
0.006
-
-
0.006
0.006
0
0
0
0
0
0
.060
.045
.056
.049
-
-
.036
.038
0.009
0.007
0.011
0.007
-
—
0.006
0.007
-------
SECTION XT
PROCEDURES
Operation Procedures
Black Liquor Addition
During the final four months of the project, kraft black liquor was added
to the Pilot Feed to increase the BOD from approximately 200 to around
500 mg/1. The black liquor was digester blow-down containing 15 to 20
percent total solids and had an average BOD of 35,000 mg/1.
The black liquor flowed by gravity from the mill storage tank to a 50-
gallon gauging box at the base of the tank. The gauging box liquor level
was controlled by a BW Floatless Liquid Level Control System consisting
of 3 stainless steel electrodes (upper level, lower level and ground)
mounted on the gauging box, a BW Relay and 2 solenoid valves located in
the pipe connecting the black liquor tank and gauging box.
The liquor was pumped from the gauging box with a MOYNO Pump through 1/2
inch black iron pipe to the 4 inch Pilot Feed line approximately 700 feet
distant. This junction point was several hundred feet from the flow
splitting box, thereby resulting in adequate mixing of the black liquor
and mill clarified effluent before addition to the pilot units.
Defoamer Addition
Approximately 700 pounds of Hodag FD-62 defoamer were added to the pilot
units during the project. The defoamer was added when needed, rather
than on a continuous basis as were the nutrients. The bulk of the defoamer
addition occurred during the final four months when black liquor was being
added to the pilot feed.
The defoamer was added to the Aerated Lagoon at the aerator. The Oxida-
tion Ditch addition was made just downstream from the brush aerator. When
required for the filters, it was added in the flow splitting box. A normal
dose which was added manually was 2 to 3 gallons for each unit when needed.
Flow Measurement
Flows into each system were measured by V-notch weirs at the flow splitting
box each weekday morning. Flows into the lagoon and Oxidation Ditch were
infrequently double checked using a five-gallon bucket and stopwatch.
Effluent rate from the ditch was also checked by the bucket and stopwatch
method.
123
-------
Main Feed Pump Operation
The two main feed pumps (mill clarified effluent and bleach effluent) each
had a recording clock which accumulated the actual hours of operation for
the pumps. Normally the clocks were reset to 0 hours at a specified time
each morning, and the percent operating time was calculated for the pre-
vious day. This recorded evidence of pilot feed downtime was used in
editing test data.
Nutrient Addition
Nutrients were added to the main feed to maintain a total dosage of
100:5:1 (BOD:N:P).
The actual ratios by Project Quarters were:
100:4.5:0.9 for first quarter
100:3.9:0.6 for second quarter
100:3.4:0.6 for third quarter
100:5.2:1.1 for last quarter
Nitrogen was obtained from 26°Be aqua ammonia, and was added direct from
the drum. Phosphorus was obtained from 75 percent phosphoric acid (H PO )
which was diluted 1 to 8 with water in order to obtain a pumping rate
comparable to the ammonia (approximately 30 ml/min.). Pumping was done
with a dual plexiglas head pump by Precision Pump Corporation. Rates
were checked daily to insure proper addition.
Power Consumption
Power readings on the brush aerator and surface aerator were obtained on
three-phase wattmeters connected to the respective units. Monthly read-
ings on all pumps, lights and other uses were taken by the Chillicothe
Area Electrical Department to determine kilowatt hours used per month
for the project.
Sampling
Samples of main feed, pilot feed and effluent from each system were
obtained using twelve minute interval timers and Little Giant submersible
pumps. The sampling period was sixteen hours per day (4 P.M. to 8 A.M.).
Samples were generally collected four days per week.
124
-------
Test Procedures
Ammonia Nitrogen
The distillation method for ammonia nitrogen was used. This method is
found in Standard Methods For The Examination of Water, Sewage and Indus-
jrial Wastes, 12th Edition, 1965 (hereinafter designated "Standard
Methods"), pp. 391-92. Boric acid was used as the receiver in the total
and ammonia nitrogen testing.
Apparent Color
This test was performed on a Bausch & Lomb Spectronic 20 using one-inch
tubes, 400 millimicron wavelength, and platinum cobalt standard. Apparent
color was run on the sample as received. True color is obtained by
centrifuging the sample, adjusting the pH to 7.6, and reading the super-
natant solution. All color values obtained during the project were
apparent color.
BOD
"" "'_?
Five-Day Biochemical Oxygen Demand tests were performed essentially as
stated in Standard Methods, pp. 415-21. Three hundred (300) ml bottles
were used for the tests. A 20°C water bath was substituted for the
refrigerator-incubator on August 1, 1968. An average of 184 IDO values
of dilution water showed 7.8 mg/1. After 5 days incubation, the dilution
water showed an average Dissolved Oxygen (D.O.) of 7.3 mg/1, resulting
in 0.5 mg/1 depletion due to seed.
The seed used was Paint Creek water above the mill clarifier outfall.
Amounts used ranged from 2.5 to 5.0 percent to keep the desired depletion
within 0.2 to 0.6 mg/1.
A standard glucose-glutamic acid solution (BOD of 221 + 10) was checked
frequently, resulting in an average value of 216 mg/1.
The initial D.O. in the sample and the D.O. in the seeded dilution water
after five days incubation were used to get the initial D.O. in calcu-
lating BOD5 results.
GOD
Chemical Oxygen Demand tests were performed essentially as stated in
Standard Methods, pp. 510-14. The only modification was in the addition
of 1 gram of silver sulfate into the reflux flask rather than adding
22 grams into the 9 pound bottle of sulfuric acid.
125
-------
Dissolved Oxygen (see Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen)
Dye Studies
Tracer studies were conducted on each pilot unit using Rhodamine B
fluorescent dye. This dye was in acetic acid solution and had a solids
content of 40 percent.
The dye concentrations as fluorescence in the pilot units were read on a
Model 111 Fluorometer supplied by G. K. Turner Associates.
Fluorometer readings were taken both manually and by recording chart.
Chart speed was varied from one inch per minute to one inch per hour,
depending on the unit tested. During the early stage of each test, one
inch per minute recordings and manual readings were taken simultaneously
to insure accurate measurement. A continuous flow—through door was
utilized in the fluorometer for all the dye studies.
Kjeldahl Nitrogen
The procedure for this test is the total Kjeldahl method as described in
Standard Methods, pp. 402-04. The only deviation from the standard tests
was in using a new indicator specially made for ammonia. This is a com-
mercial product called N-point, available from Mathieson-Coleman-Bell.
Long Term BOD-Jug Method
This test was performed in the following manner:
1. Prepared 16 liter mixture of sample and dilution water containing
seed and nutrients. The ratio of sample to water was dependent upon
the BOD concentration of the sample.
2. Added the above mixture to a 5-gallon carboy and aerated to a D.O.
level of 7 to 8 mg/1.
3. Filled 6 BOD bottles from carboy by siphon technique. Placed open
carboy and the 6 filled and stoppered BOD bottles into a 20°C incu-
bator.
4. Winkler tests were run daily on 2 of the BOD bottles and the average
residual D.O. was recorded.
5. When the D.O. dropped to a concentration of 1 to 2 mg/1, the remain-
ing bottles were poured back into the carboy and reaerated to a D.O.
of 7 to 8 mg/1. After reaeration, the 6 BOD bottles were filled and
placed in the incubator. Daily Winkler tests were initiated again.
This cycle was repeated until the desired number of incubation days
was obtained, usually 20 to 30 days. The YSI polarographic D.O. test
was used in place of the Winkler method for the long term BOD studies
initiated August 20, 1969.
126
-------
Nitrate Nitrogen
This determination was made by the polarographic method using the Sargent
Manual Polarograph, Model III, and is essentially the test as shown in
Standard Methods, pp. 398-400. All samples submitted to chemical testing
for nitrogen were preserved with 0.8 ml sulfuric acid per liter of sample.
Oxygen Uptake Studies
These studies were conducted as described on pages 15-16 of The Instruc-
tions For YSI Model 54 Oxygen Meter. Yellow Springs Instrument Company
of Yellow Springs, Ohio supplied the Model 54 D.O. meter and 5420A D.O.
bottle probe. This probe was equipped with a rotary stirrer and auto-
matic temperature compensator.
The previously calibrated probe was placed into a 300 ml BOD bottle
containing the sample. Initial D.O. and temperature readings were taken.
Readings were then taken every 15 minutes until the D.O. level dropped
to 1 to 3 mg/1. The probe was kept in the sample in order to prevent
atmospheric oxygen from being absorbed. The sample was stirred continu-
ally during the test period.
The above procedure was altered as follows when six AL sample points were
run simultaneously. Each sample was placed into a BOD bottle which was
stoppered to prevent air entry. Each sample bottle was placed on a sepa-
rate magnetic stirrer for continual mixing. In order to prevent temper-
ature increase from the magnetic stirrer motor, the bottle was placed in
a beaker of water. When sample temperature started to rise, ice was added
to this water bath. Constant temperature control was very satisfactory
using this technique.
pH
A Beckman Zeromatic pH meter was used for pH testing. The meter was
standardized daily with pH 6.86 buffer solution.
Settleable Solids
This test was done as described in Standard Methods, pp. 425-26. Sludge
settleable solids were run for 30 minutes instead of the conventional
one hour.
Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen
Dissolved oxygen in the field was measured by the polarographic method
using a YSI Model 51 Oxygen Meter by Yellow Springs Instrument Company.
This meter was calibrated in saturated air at the sample temperature.
Occasionally a Winkler test was also run for comparison. This test was
done as described in Standard Methods, pp. 405-10, and is called the
azide modification of the Winkler test. Temperatures were taken with
the thermistor on the YSI meter.
12?
-------
Total Phosphate
Sample was wet ashed before starting test. The phosphate test is derived
from Standard Methods, pp. 234-36. It has been modified from Boltz by
substituting sodium molybdate and hydrazine sulfate for ammonium molybdate
and stannous chloride, respectively. A blue color is formed which is
read on the DK-2 Beckman Spectrophotometer at 830 millimicrons. During
the first quarter all soluble nutrient tests were centrifuged for 30 min-
utes at 85 G's. Tests were run on the supernatant liquid.
For the remainder of the project, the samples were filtered through glass
fiber filters as in the suspended solids procedure. Tests for soluble
nutrients were performed on the filtrate.
Total and Volatile Suspended Solids
These tests were performed as described in Standard Methods, pp. 424-25,
except for the use of glass fiber filters instead of the asbestos mat.
Sample volume was 50 ml, rather than 100 ml. A Mettler One Pan Automatic
Balance weighing to 4 places was used.
Total and Volatile Total Solids
Standard Methods^ page 423, gives the procedure used for testing of total
solids. The Mettler balance was used for weighing.
Velocities and Sludge Depth
Flow direction and velocity were obtained in the Oxidation Ditch and
Lagoon using the Marine Advisors Q-9 Current Meter.
Sludge depths in the ditch and lagoon were obtained using a photoelectric
cell fabricated by the Mead Research Instrument Department.
Data Calculations
All daily solids (total and suspended) and BOD computations were sub-
mitted to the Computer Group for calculation and tabulation on the
digital computer. The raw data were submitted approximately every three
weeks, which resulted in a short time lag in obtaining final results;
however, this presented no problem in coordinating the data.
128
-------
SECTION XEI
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This project covered over three years from conception to final report. It
was necessary to utilize the talents of many people to bring the project
to successful completion. These persons are acknowledged for their direct
involvement in some phase of the project;
W. C. Mathews who, with Karl C. Ayers, conceived the project;
David W. McAnaney, who served first as design engineer for the pilot plant,
later as project leader during the second year, and also made significant
strides in handling the data by computer;
Karl C. Ayers, project leader for the first year of the project, who
later organized and wrote much of the final report;
Thomas H. Patton, Jr., final project leader, who later helped organize much
of the data, and wrote the mathematical modeling sections of this report;
Jack E. Robbins, project coordinator, who greatly assisted the project en-
gineers and pilot plant operators throughout the project and devoted much
time and talent to the final report;
Robert E. Smith, David T. Robinson and Glen R. Laessle, pilot plant oper-
ators, who set up and ran the many system changes, performed many tests
and collected most of the data on which this final report is based. They
solved problems ranging from autumn leaves, winter freezeups and spring
floods to summer heat and (throughout it all) equipment failures;
Viola Loel, chemical technician, who conducted many of the chemical tests
routine to this project;
John E. Brewer, who programmed and ran the data sheets which appear in the
APPENDIX. His patience, concern and ability are acknowledged;
Emelyne Reed, who typed a preliminary draft from handwritten sheets, many
more drafts as the changes came, then the completed report;
Many more Mead people, including Virgil A. Minch, John C. Redd, Charles H.
Schneider, John R. Arnold, William E. Anderson and John D. Davis.
Associated Water and Air Resources, Inc., Nashville, Tennessee, consult-
ing firm, is acknowledged for arranging for Thomas H. Patton, Jr. to be
available, and later guiding the data analysis portion of the project.
Special acknowledgment goes to Ralph H. Scott, Project Officer for FWQA,
who gave encouragement and advice to all project leaders and helped to
bring the project to a successful conclusion. Project support was provided by
the Industrial Pollution Control Branch of the Environmental Protection Agency.
129
-------
SECTION XIII
REFERENCES
Publications Relative To This Project:
(1) Ayers, K.C., and D. W. McAnaney, "First Semi-Annual Data Report
for Mead-FWPCA Project on Advanced Biological Treatment"
(June through December, 1968).
(2) McAnaney, D.W., "Second Semi-Annual Data Report for Mead-FWPCA
Project on Advanced Biological Treatment" (January through June,
1969).
(3) McAnaney, D.W., "Third Semi-Annual Data Report for Mead-FWPCA
Project'on Advanced Biological Treatment" (July through December,
1969).
Other References Cited in Report:
(4) Anon., "COD and BOD Relationships of Raw and Biologically Treated
Kraft Mill Effluents," (National Council for Stream Improvement
Technical Bulletin No. 22: 1966).
(5) Anon., Operation of Wastewater Treatment Plants (Water Pollution
Control Federation Manual of Practice No. 11: 1970).
(6) Burchinal, Jerry C., "A Detailed Study of the Oxidation Ditch as a
Method of Wastewater Treatment at Cameron, West Virginia," (Final
Report of Federal Water Pollution Control Administration Demon-
stration Grant Number WPD 36-01: November, 1967).
(7) Eckenfelder, W. Wesley, and Edwin L. Barnhart, "Performance of a
High Rate Trickling Filter Using Selected Media," Journal of Water
Pollution Control Federation, Vol. 35, No. 12, (December, 1963),
pp. 1535-1551.
(8) Eckenfelder, W. W. , "Oxygen Transfer and Aeration," Graduate
Lecture Series in Environmental and Water Resources Engineering,
Vanderbilt University (1970).
(9) Eckenfelder, W. W. , and D. L. Ford, Water Pollution Control-Experi-
mental Procedures for Process Design, (The Pemberton Press: 1970).
(10) Eckenfelder, W. W. , Jr., personal communication.
(11) Eckenfelder, W. W. , Jr., and A. J. Englande, "Temperature Effects
on Biological Waste Treatment Processes," Vanderbilt University,
Nashville, Tennessee (June, 1970).
I3-L
-------
(12) Edde, Howard, "A Manual of Practice for Biological Waste Treatment
in the Pulp and Paper Industry," (National Council Technical Bulletin
No. 214: 1968).
(13) Gehm, Harry W. , and George W. Gove, "Kraft Mill Waste Treatment in
the United States - A Status Report," (National Council Technical
Bulletin No. 221: 1968).
(14) Grube, Gareth A., and R. Sage Murphy, "Oxidation Ditch Works Well in
Sub-Arctic Climate," Water and Sewage Works (July, 1969) pp.267-71.
(15) Guillaume, F., "Evaluation of the Oxidation Ditch as a Means of
Wastewater Treatment in Ontario," (The Ontario Water Resources
Commission: July, 1964).
(16) Kaneshige, Harry M., "Performance of the Somerset, Ohio Oxidation
Ditch," Journal of_ Water Pollution Control Federation Vol. 42,
No. 7 (July, 1970) pp. 1370-78.
(17) McKeown, James J., "Comparative Studies on the Analysis For Dis-
solved Oxygen," (National Council for Stream Improvement Technical
Bulletin Number 184: 1965).
(18) Tischler, L. F., "Linear Removal of Simple Organic Compounds in the
Activated Sludge Process," Doctoral Thesis, University of Texas,
Austin, Texas (1968).
(19) Whitney, Roy P. (Editor) , Chemical Recovery in Alkaline Pulping
Processes. TAPPI Monograph Series No. 32 (Mack Printing Company:
1968).
Other References of Specific Interest:
(20) Chandhuri, N., "Technique of Evaluation of System Parameters Relat-
ing Solids Accumulation in Oxidation Ditch Process," (5th Inter-
national Water Pollution Research Conference: July-August, 1970).
(21) Middlebrooks, E. Joe, and Frank J. Coogan, "Treatment of Kraft Mill
Wastes With a Plastic Media Trickling Filter," Water Research,
Vol. 3 (Pergamon Press: 1968), pp. 203-14.
(22) Nemerow, Nelson Leonard, Theories and Practices of Industrial
Waste Treatment (Addison-Wesley: 1963).
(23) Ordon, Chester J., "Recent Approaches for Trickling Filter Design,"
Journal of_ the Sanitary Engineering Division (June, 1968)
Vol. 94, No. SA3, pp. 579-83.
(24) Robertson, Peter G., P. David Wilson, and Jon C. Liebman, "Statis-
tical Comparison of Trickling Filter Equations Using Papermill
Effluent Data," Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation,
Vol. 40, No. 10 (October, 1968), pp. 1764-78.
132
-------
SECTION XIV
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
v
AL
BOD:N:P
BOD
°C
CL1
CL2
D
D.O.
Equil.
F/M Ratio
gpd/sf
gpra
hp-hr
Specific area of the filter media (square foot/cubic
foot); used in mathematical modeling.
Pilot Aerated Lagoon. Symbol was used primarily in
designating test series; i.e., AL-1 meant test series
one on the Pilot Aerated Lagoon.
BOD to Nitrogen to Phosphorus ratio on weight basis
for nutrient addition.
Conventional 5-day biochemical oxygen demand.
Conventional 5-day biochemical oxygen demand unless
long term BOD is so stated, i.e., 21-day BOD.
Degrees Celcius (formally Centigrade).
Clarifier 1, cone-shaped clarifier used only with
Trickling Filter 1.
Clarifier 2, Rex Rim Flow clarifier used with
Trickling Filter 2, or Oxidation Ditch, depending
upon test period and sequence.
Depth (feet) of Aeration Basin or Trickling Filter;
used in mathematical modeling.
Dissolved Oxygen.
Equilibrium period. Symbol was used primarily in
designating extent of test series set aside after
changing operational parameters in order to acclimate
the biological process to the new conditions.
Food (BOD loading in pounds per day per volume)
to Microorganisms (bacteria as mixed liquor volatile
suspended solids in pounds).
Gallons per day flow rate.
Gallons per day per square foot of surface area.
Gallons per minute flow rate.
Horsepower hour.
133
-------
K
k
Kjeld. N
KWH
MC
MGD
mg/1
MLVSS
ml/1
ml/l/hr
N
n
Net hp
Net hp/1000
NO -N
OD
PF
Overall biological rate constant determined from
experimental results; used in mathematical modeling.
Biological rate constant used in mathematical modeling.
Total Kjeldahl nitrogen. This is organic nitrogen
plus ammonia nitrogen, but does not include nitrate
nitrogen.
Kilowatt hours of electrical energy.
Mill clarifier effluent from the Chillicothe Division
of The Mead Corporation which served as influent to
the pilot treatment plant. MC is not to be confused
with PF which was the same wastewater after supple-
mental nutrients had been added.
Million gallons per day flow rate.
Milligram per liter.
Mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (see X ).
Milliliter per liter in one hour or 1/2 hour for sludge.
Milliliter per liter in one hour.
Percent recirculation divided by 100; used in
mathematical modeling.
Hydraulic exponent determined from flow tracer
studies; used in mathematical modeling.
Gross horsepower required for aerators minus no
load horsepower.
gallons Net horsepower applied per 1000 gallons volume in
aeration basins.
Ammonia expressed as nitrogen.
Nitrate expressed as nitrogen.
Pilot Oxidation Ditch. Symbol was used primarily
in designating test series.
Pilot Feed, influent to pilot plant after supple-
mental nutrients had been added.
134
-------
ppd Pounds per day.
ppd/1000 cf Pounds per day per 1000 cubic feet of volume.
PO.-P Phosphate expressed as phosphorus.
PVC Polyvinyl chloride plastic media.
Q Hydraulic loading as gallons per minute or per day
per square foot; used in mathematical modeling.
S BOD (mg/1) of incoming wastewater to the treatment
a unit; used in mathematical modeling.
S BOD- (mg/1) of effluent from the treatment unit;
usea in mathematical modeling.
S BOD (mg/1) of incoming wastewater to the treatment
0 unit including dilution effect of recycle in the case
of the trickling filters; used in mathematical modeling.
SVI Sludge Volume Index.
T Temperature (°C) of the biological process; used in
mathematical modeling.
t Detention time (days) of the treatment unit or
expression of exposure time in trickling filter;
used in mathematical modeling.
TF1 Trickling Filter 1 which recycled sludge. Symbol
was used primarily in designating test series.
TF2 Trickling Filter 2 which recycled effluent or filtrate.
Symbol was used primarily in designating test series.
6 Temperature coefficient; used in mathematical modeling.
X Volatile suspended solids (mg/1) under contact in the
v system and is intended as an expression of the active
biological mass; used in mathematical modeling.
135
-------
SECTION XV
APPENDIX
TABLE 40 Drainage Frequency of Aeration Basins 130
TABLE 41 Sludge Wasting Program on Clarifier 1 131
Explanation of Information in TABLES 42-111 132
Explanation of Information in SHEETS 1-60 132
TABLES 42-59 Summary of Results for TF1 Unit 133
TABLES 60-80 Summary of Results for TF2 Unit and TF2-CL2 in Series 151
TABLES 81-93 Summary of Results for AL Unit 172
TABLES 94-111 Summary of Results for OD Unit and OD-CL2 in Series 185
SHEETS 1-60 Listing of All Routine Data by Unit and Date 203
137
-------
Test
Period
First
DRAINAGE FREQUENCY OF AERATION BASINS
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Test
AL-Equil 1
OD-Equil 1
OD-Equil 2
Contingency
OD-Equil 3
System
AL
OD
OD
CL2
OD + CL2
CL2
OD + CL2
Date
Drain
8-12-68
8-29-68
10-10-68
11-3-68
12-11-68
Fill
6-6-68
6-6-68
8-14-68
9-4-68
(changing clarifier
to OD from TF2)
10-23-68
11-4-68
12-13-68
(OD-3 ended 12-6-68)
Second OD-Equil 4 CL2
OD-4 CL2
OD-4 CL2
OD-Equil 5 CL2
Contingency OD
OD-6 CL2
2-26-69
3-12-69
3-23-69
4-2-69
4-11-69
6-4-69
2-27-69
3-13-69
3-24-69
4-4-69
4-13-69
6-5-69
Third
OD-7
OD-7
AL-Equil 11
No Testing
No Testing
No Testing
CL2
CL2
AL
OD + CL2
CL2
AL
8-4-69
8-11-69
10-11-69
10-11-69
12-8-69
12-18-69
No Testing
OD + CL2
12-18-69
8-5-69
8-13-69
10-14-69
12-1-69
12-9-69
Drained from 5.5'
to 5.0'
Fourth
OD-Equil 9
OD-Equil 10
OD + CL2
CL2
3-8-70
1-6-70
3-10-70
TABLE 40
138
-------
SLUDGE WASTING PROGRAM ON CLARIFIER 1
(Mead-FWQA Project on Biological Treatment)
Sludge
Wasted
Date
Dec. 1968
3-21-69 thru 3-23-69
3-24-69 thru 4-1-69
4-2-69
4-3-69 thru 4-9-69
4-10-69
5-10-69 thru 5-28-69
5-29-69
5-30-69 thru 6-11-69
6-12-69
6-16-69 thru 7-3-69
7-9-69
7-14-69 thru 8-31-69
9-1-69 thru 10-12-69
10-13-69 thru 12-19-69
2-25-70
3-9-70 thru 3-19-70
3-20-70
3-23-70
3-24-70 thru 5-1-70
Test No.
End of TF1-7
TF1-9
TF1-9
TF1-9
TF1-9
End of TF-9
TF1-11
TF1-12
TF1-12
TF1-12
TF1-13
End of TF1-13
TF1-14
TF1-15
TF1-16
TF1-17
TF1-18
TF1-18
TF1-18
TF1-18
gpd
ALL
50
100
700
100
ALL
50
1300
100
300
100
ALL
100
-
ALL
100
660
3300
100
Remarks
CL1 pumped out by Septic
Tank Service in preparation
for 2nd Test Period
Measured in 50 gal. drum
CL1 pumped out by Septic
Tank Service
Sludge Spill
CL1 pumped out by Septic
Tank Service
CL1 eliminated for this test
Pumped out by MEAD. No re-
cycle - just let sludge
build up, then pumped out.
139
TABLE 41
-------
Explanation of Information in TABLES 42 Through 111
Reference is made to TABLE 42 (next page). The title "SUMMARY OF PILOT
TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1-1" shows that this was the first test
performed on Trickling Filter 1. The influent or feed source was PF mean-
ing Pilot Feed.
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA, INFLUENT and EFFLUENT values were for the entire
test period as shown - 6/10/68 through 7/28/68.
EDITED DATA AVERAGES. INFLUENT and EFFLUENT. EFFLUENT MINIMUMS and
MAXIMUMS. and % REDUCTION were taken from 7/3/68 to 7/19/68 as shown.
There were twenty parameters tested, of which, for example, the BOD
(mg/1) "mixed" showed an all data average influent of 204 derived from
(15) values, and an average effluent BOD of 58 mg/1 from (14) values.
The edited data average BOD showed an influent of 224 mg/1 and an
effluent of 73 mg/1. Each number was derived from (6) values.
The range of the edited effluent BOD values was 52 to 87 mg/1.
The % reduction of the unit for BOD was 67.5 based on edited influent
and effluent.
Explanation of Information in SHEETS 1 through 60
Reference is made to SHEET 1 (page 203). The title "LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL
DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED" refers to all individual
data obtained during the project and is tabulated by date with test
parameters identified in the first column and feed and system effluents
identified across the top of each day's block.
The four blocks in SHEET 1 contain the data for 6-21-68, 6-26-68, 6-28-68,
and 7-3-68, respectively. No routine data were recorded for dates not
listed.
The edited deletions are indicated by the word "DELETE" and pertain to
all data for that system on that date. For example, AL data were deleted
in total on 6-21-68 and 6-28-68, principally because acclimation was not
yet achieved in the opinion of the Project Leader. The test summaries
(TABLES 42 through 111) contain averages with and without the deleted
data included so it is possible to see the effect of deletions if
desired.
140
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
6/10/68 THROUGH 7/28/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
7/ 3/68 TO 7/19/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
OVERALL
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM )
D.O.(MGXL)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L)
SOLIDStMG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
INFLUEN1
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.9
37
204(
0(
1019(
33K
235(
109(
0.5(
1265(
7.6(
5.7(
0.8(
0.0(
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
0)
8)
8)
15)
0)
13)
13)
14)
13)
10)
11)
12)
12)
12)
0)
0)
0)
0)
• EFFLUENT I NFL
22.2(15) oToT
24. 0(
22.61
2.6(
32(
58(
01
1024(
318(
247(
99(
1 .0 (
9551
7.3(
2.0(
0.5(
0.9(
0(
0(
790. 0(
15)
15)
3)
8)
14)
0)
5)
5)
6)
6)
12)
12)
11)
12)
12)
8)
0)
0)
2)
0.0(
0.0(
2.5(
36 (
224<
0(
1070(
357(
199(
104(
1 . 0(
1460(
7.5(
5.2(
1.01
0.0{
0(
0(
0.0(
JENT
"oT
0)
0)
4)
4)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
4)
5)
6)
6)
6)
0)
0)
0)
0)
EFFLUENT
22. 4(
24.01
23. 0(
1 .5 (
31 (
73(
0(
1086(
396(
242 (
70(
1 .2 (
10871
7.3(
1 .8 (
0.7(
1.3(
0(
0(
0.0(
6)
6)
6)
1)
4)
6)
0)
1)
1)
1)
1)
5)
5)
5)
6)
6)
3)
0)
0)
0)
MIN.
"2TTT)
24.0
22.2
1.5
28
52
1086
396
242
70
0.0
800
7.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
MAX.
23.5
24.0
25.0
1.5
34
87
1086
396
242
70
4.7
1475
7.6
3.4
1.0
3.0
UNIT
67.5
-1.5
-10.8
-21.3
32.2
25.5
2.6
64.7
28.5
tr1
W
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
•VINDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
E
C-1
M
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
7/29/68 THROUGH 8/18/68
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 8/ 5/68 TO 8/18/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* 25REDUCTI ON*
OVERALL
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMPIDEG C)
BOD51MG/L )
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L)
SOLIDS(MG/L )
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0.0( 0) 33. 2( 8)
0.0(
0.0(
4.0(
37 (
195(
0(
1584(
587(
389(
147 (
0.4(
2126(
8.K
10. 1(
1.81
0.0{
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
6)
6)
8)
0)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
5)
7)
6)
6)
0)
0)
0)
0)
24. 0(
33.21
O.K
33(
102(
0(
1254(
43 6 (
325(
150<
1.7(
1659(
7.4(
5.0(
l.K
O.K
0(
0(
162. 0(
8)
8)
6)
6)
8)
0)
8)
8)
8)
8)
7)
6)
8)
8)
8)
6)
0)
0)
5)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0(
0.0(
4.0(
37 (
207(
0(
1496(
558(
417(
156(
0.2(
2160(
8.K
11. 0(
1.2(
0.01
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
5)
5)
6)
0)
5)
5
5
5
5
4
5
5
5)
0)
0)
0)
0)
EFFLUENT
33. 2(
24.01
33. 2(
O.K
33 (
UK
0(
1294(
457(
355(
152(
1.21
1566(
7.5(
5.4(
1.0(
O.K
0(
0(
150. 0(
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
5)
0)
0)
3)
MIN.
TTT^
24.0
33.3
0.0
30
75
1046
374
142
70
0.2
980
7.4
0.3
0.2
0.0
120.0
MAX.
•5975
24.0
33.3
0.4
35
136
1452
567
438
190
2.3
2055
7.6
23.1
2.2
0.4
200.0
UNIT
46.3
13.5
18.2
14.9
2.4
27.5
7.4
50.0
19.2
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
•INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
H
M
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
8/19/68 THROUGH 9/ 8/68
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 8/21/68 TO 9/ 8/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM )
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP1DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(MLXL)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0(
0.0(
2.K
39 (
1801
0(
1437(
58 1(
386(
163(
5.4(
1668 (
8.4(
3.7(
3.0(
0)
0)
6)
6)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
EFFLUENT
43. 7(
24.01
44. 2(
0.0(
35(
110(
0(
1296(
510(
282(
167(
1.2(
12971
7.5(
2.7<
1.9(
6)
6)
6)
0)
5)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
2.6(
38(
190(
0(
1418(
585(
390(
15K
6.2(
16671
8.4{
2.7(
3.6(
0)
0)
0)
5)
5)
5)
0)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
EFFLUENT
43. ii
24. 0(
44. 2 (
0.0(
35(
110(
0(
1296(
510(
282(
167(
1.2(
1297(
7.5(
2.7(
1.9(
6)
6)
6)
0)
5)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
MIN.
4270
24.0
44.0
31
69
1068
351
176
120
0.3
650
7.2
0.0
0.9
MAX.
44.4
24.0
44.4
39
163
1547
692
468
218
2.0
2100
7.8
9.0
2.9
UNIT OVERALL
42.1
8.5
12.7
27.6
-10.7
22.2
11.1
0.0
46.7
D.O.(MG/L) 0.0( 0) 0.4( 5) 0.0( 0) 0.4( 5) 0.2 1.0
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) 0{ 0)
VOLATILE SUSP. 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0)
SLUDGE(ML/L) 0.0( 0) 9.9( 6) 0.0( 0) 9.9( 6) 0.4 31.0
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
*INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
i
f
w
4>
Ul
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TFST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
9/ 9/68 THROUGH 10/ 6/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
9/23/68 TO 10/ 6/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
OVERALL
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1 5
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
TEST WAS FROM 10/ 7/68 THROUGH 10/27/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM 10/14/68 TO 10/27/68
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L )
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION-
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0.0( 0) 22. 1( 9)
0.0(
0.0(
5.5(
36(
207 (
0(
1328(
47 1(
399 (
180(
l.K
1596(
6.8(
15. 0(
1.4(
0.0(
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
6)
5)
9)
0)
8)
8)
9)
9)
8)
7)
8)
9)
9)
0)
0)
0)
0)
24.01
22. 1(
0.2(
30 (
721
0(
1110(
340 (
28K
133(
3.2(
1036(
7.5{
4.9(
1.5(
0.3(
0(
0(
207. 3(
9)
9)
4)
8)
9
0
9
9
9
9
9)
9)
9)
9)
9)
8)
0)
0)
6)
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0.0( 0) 22. 2( 5)
0.0(
0.0(
5.3(
36(
2001
0(
1334(
464 (
413(
179(
1.4(
1675(
7.8(
4.4(
l.K
0.0(
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
4)
3)
6)
0)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
6)
6)
0)
0)
0)
0)
24. 0(
22. 2(
0.2(
31(
80<
0(
1144(
359(
312(
144 (
4.3(
1030(
7.5(
4.4(
1.4(
O.K
0(
0(
210. 2(
5)
5)
4)
5)
5)
0)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
0)
0)
4)
MIN.
22.2
24.0
22.2
0.0
30
56
1069
305
198
90
1.0
725
7.2
3.0
1.2
0.0
125.0
MAX.
22.2
24.0
22.2
0.5
32
106
1232
427
456
250
9.0
1250
7.8
5.9
1.8
0.3
256.0
UNI
«•••
60.
14.
22.
24.
19.
38.
4.
0.
-25.
J ™ERALL
0
2
7
5
5
5
0
1
2
w
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
I
w
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE
TEST WAS FROM 10/28/68 THROUGH 11/17/68
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM ll/ 6/68 TO 11/17/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLl
0.01
0.0(
0.0(
6.0(
36(
224(
01
14131
579(
493(
206 (
1 .41
2219(
8.4(
11. 8(
2.2(
JENT EFFLUENT INFLUENT
OT 29. 5( B\ 0.0( 0)
0)
0)
6)
6)
8)
0)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
7)
8)
8)
22. 0(
0.0(
O.K
23(
115(
0(
1045(
404 (
289(
14K
0.2(
1625(
7.5(
6.3(
1.5(
8)
8)
1)
6)
8)
0)
8)
8)
8)
8)
7)
8)
8)
8)
8)
0.0(
0.0(
6.3(
36(
216(
0(
1405(
569(
484(
202(
1 .6(
2182(
8.4(
12. 7(
2.2(
0)
0)
5)
5)
7)
0)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
6)
7)
7)
EFFLUENT
29. 5(
22. 0(
0.0(
0.0(
22(
112(
0(
103K
400 (
293(
144 (
0.3(
162K
7.5(
6.3(
1 .5 (
7)
7)
7)
0)
5)
7
0
7
7
7
7)
6)
7)
7)
7)
7)
MIN.
22.0
0.0
20
87
0
0
170
14
0.1
900
6.9
4.3
0.3
MAX.
7976
22.0
0.0
24
165
1454
655
444
276
0.5
2600
9.2
7.7
3.6
UNIT OVERALL
48.1
26.6
29.6
39.4
28.7
25.6
11.2
50.5
30.3
D.O.(MG/L) 0.0( 0) 1.8{ 5) 0.0( 0) 1.8( 5) 0.1 4.9
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0)
VOLATILE SUSP. 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0)
SLUDGE(ML/L) 0.0( 0) 950.0( 1) 0.0( 0) 950.0( 1)
950.0 950.0
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
H
&
f
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1 7
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
TEST WAS FROM 11/18/68 THROUGH 12/ 6/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM 11/18/68 TO
12/ 6/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* %REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM )
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
3.9(
351
239(
0(
1328(
479 (
439 (
177(
l.K
2203(
7.8(
8.5(
1.6(
0)
0)
0)
7)
6)
10)
0)
10)
10)
10)
10)
8)
8)
10)
10)
10)
EFFLUENT
14.7(10)
22. 0( 10)
0.0( 10)
1.0( 3)
21( 7)
107( 10)
0( 0)
1804( 10)
790(10)
273( 9)
135( 8)
l.K 9)
1470(10)
7.3(10)
5.7( 10)
l.K 10)
INFLUENT
0.0<
0.0(
0.0(
3.3(
35(
216(
0(
1167(
413(
338(
154(
0.7(
17381
7.8(
8.3(
1.7(
0)
0)
0)
5)
4)
8)
0)
8)
8)
8)
8)
6)
6)
8)
8)
8)
EFFLUENT
14. 7(
22. 0(
0.0(
1 .0 (
21 (
105(
Of
1853(
824(
250(
131(
l.K
1428(
7.3(
6.0(
1 .2(
9)
9)
9)
3)
6)
9)
0)
9)
9)
8)
7)
8)
9)
9)
9)
9)
MIN.
14.8
22.0
0.0
0.0
18
78
1125
0
98
66
0.1
850
7.1
3.9
0.5
MAX.
14.8
22.0
0.0
3.0
24
139
4724
4188
326
194
6.0
1800
7.6
8.1
1.6
UNIT OVERALL
51
-58
-99
25
14
17
7
27
30
.6
.8
.7
.9
.8
.8
.1
.5
.6
D.O.(MG/L) 0.0( 0) 1.0( 7)
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED 0( 0) 0( 0)
VOLATILE SUSP. 0( 0) 0( 0)
SLUDGE(MLXL) 0.0( 0) 0.0( 0)
0.0( 0) 0.7( 6)
0.1
1.5
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
0)
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
0)
-P-
oo
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
I
M
4s
VO
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
21 3/69 THROUGH 3/ 9/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
2/26/69 TO 3/ 9/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM )
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.01
0.0(
0.0(
6.31
31(
285(
0(
1887(
622(
462(
149(
5.7(
2142<
7.4(
6.5(
2.5(
0)
0)
0)
11)
11)
12)
0)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
11)
11)
11)
EFFLUENT
33. 2( 12)
24. 0{ 12)
33. 2( 12)
0.0( 0)
23( 10)
183( 12)
0( 0)
165K 12)
455( 12)
353< 12)
148( 12)
1.0( 12)
1894( 12)
7.4( 11)
1.8( 3)
1.3( 3)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
6.3(
32(
295(
0(
1855(
704(
491(
203(
4.H
2142(
7.51
8.4(
2.6(
0)
0)
0)
6)
6)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
EFFLUENT
33. 2(
24. 0(
33. 2(
0.0(
22(
153(
0(
1515(
4691
310(
144(
0.8(
1670(
7.2(
0.0(
0.0(
5)
5)
5)
0)
5)
5)
0)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
0)
0)
MIN.
33.3
24.0
33.3
21
102
1415
400
170
74
0.2
1250
7.0
MAX.
33.3
24.0
33.3
24
226
1602
632
416
202
2.0
2200
7.6
UN
••M
48
18
33
36
29
22
2
IT OVERALL
**"* •••«•••••
.1
.3
.3
.9
.1
.0
.8
D.O. (MG/L)
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
0.0( 0) 0.7(10)
0.0( 0) 0.8( 5)
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
0)
8896{11)
3410(11 )
372.5(10)
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
0)
11308(
4826(
436.0(
5)
5)
5)
0.5
5990
2532
110.0
1.7
17510
7899
770.0
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
*INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
3/10/69 THROUGH 4/ 6/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
3/17/69 TO
6/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION'
PARAMETER
FEEO(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM )
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDSIMG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
5.9( 13)
31(13)
2121 16)
0( 0)
1989(15)
64-4 ( 15)
54-3(15)
242( 15)
6.8( 15)
1798(15)
7 ; 6 ( 1 1 )
7.6( 11)
2.9( 11)
EFFLUENT
44.3(16)
24. 0( 16)
22. 1(16)
0.0( 0)
26(14)
110(16)
0( 0)
1847( 16)
463( 16)
330( 16)
160( 16)
1.5( 16)
1581(16)
7.3( 15)
3.3( 4)
1.6( 4)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
5.7( 9)
31( 9)
207(12)
0( 0)
1808( 11)
593( 11
538( 11
26K 11
7.2( 11
1773( 11
7.7( 9
7.4( 9)
2.9( 9)
EFFLUENT
44. 3( 11)
24.0(11)
22. 1( 11)
0.0( 0)
26( 9)
108( 11)
0( 0)
1995(11)
464 ( 11)
350(11)
172( 11)
0.8( 11)
1550( 11)
7.3( 11)
3.7( 3)
1.4( 3)
MIN.
44.4
24.0
22.2
24
66
1271
347
202
68
0.1
1050
6.9
1.4
1.3
MAX.
4T74
24.0
22.2
29
137
6490
559
580
304
2.5
1900
7.9
6.1
1.8
UNIT OVERALL
47.9
-10.3
21.7
34.9
34.1
12.5
5.3
49.8
50.9
D.O.(MG/L)
SOLIDS(MGXL)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP,
SLUDGE(MLXL)
0.0( 0)
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
0)
0.3(14)
14056(14)
6636(14)
402.0(15)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.3( 9)
14605(11)
7025(11)
469.0(11)
0.0
0.7
11448 18902
5375 8529
200.0 900.0
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
I
w
H
Vn
O
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RC-SULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
10
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
4/14/69 THROUGH 5/ 4/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
4/21/69 TO 5/ 4/69
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP
-------
H
&
f
Pd
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
11
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
5/ 5/69 THROUGH 5/25/69
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 5/14/69 TO 5/25/69
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L)
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* %REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
6.5(
32(
206(
0(
1503(
500 (
329(
152(
0.7(
1628(
7.3(
12. 4(
3.2(
0)
0)
0)
11)
11)
11)
0)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
EFFLUENT
22. 1<
24. 0(
22. 1(
0.0(
26(
64(
0(
1310(
363(
247(
110(
1 .7(
1142(
7.3(
9.K
1.6(
12)
12)
12)
0)
12)
11)
0)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
3)
3)
INFLUENT EFFLUENT_
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
6.6(
33 (
198(
0(
1562(
529(
397(
179(
0.8(
1847(
7.2(
11. 7(
3.0(
0
0
0
6
6
6
0
7
7
7
22. 2(
24. 0(
22. 2(
0.0(
26(
62 (
0(
1315(
382(
265(
7) 135<
7) 1.6(
7) 1163(
7) 7.3(
7) 7.6(
7) 1.6(
4)
4)
4)
0)
4)
3)
0)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
1)
1)
MIN,
22.2
24.0
22.2
22
54
1213
339
206
122
1.0
1000
7.2
7.6
1.6
MAX.
22.2
24.0
22.2
28
68
1358
425
310
160
2.5
1300
7.7
7.6
1.6
UNIT OVERALL
68
15
27
33
24
37
-1
35
46
.6
.8
.6
.4
.4
.0
.0
.1
.9
0.0( 0) 1.0(12) 0.0( 0) 1.2( 4) 1.0 1.5
0( 0) 7956(12) 0( 0) 14166( 4) 10160 18902
0( 0) 3652(12) 0( 0) 6440( 4) 4585 8967
0.0( 0) 153.7(12) 0.0( 0) 196.2( 4) 55.0 340.0
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
U)
TEST WAS FROM
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
12
INFLUENT SOURCE
5/26/69 THROUGH 6/15/69
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 6/ 2/69 TO 6/15/69
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DF.PTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOL IDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O.(MG/L)
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA
INFLUENT
0.01 0)
0.0(
0.01
3.2(
36<
167(
0(
1537(
548 (
4041
152 (
2.0(
1643(
7.0(
7.51
3.4(
0.0(
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
8)
8)
10)
0)
9)
9)
9)
9)
10)
10)
8)
8)
8)
0)
0)
0)
0)
EffLV
33.2!
24. 0(
33. 2(
0.0(
33(
791
0(
1375(
426(
316(
152(
2.3(
145H
7.4(
3.6(
3.2<
0.5(
15678(
6585(
539.0(
ENT
10)
10)
10)
0)
9)
10)
0)
9)
9)
9)
9)
10)
10)
10)
3)
3)
9)
9)
9)
10)
EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
INFLUENT EFFLUt
6.61 0) 33. 2(
0.0(
0.0(
3.5(
37 (
194(
0(
1607(
565(
487(
169(
2.3(
1813(
7.0(
7.0(
3.8(
0.0(
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
4)
4)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
5)
0)
0)
0)
0)
24.0(
33. 2(
0.0(
33(
10K
0(
1463 (
454 (
348 <
16K
3.7(
1688(
7.2(
2.9(
3.8(
0.5(
1685K
7080(
638. 7(
ENT
TT
4)
4)
0)
4)
4)
0)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
2)
2)
4)
4)
4)
4)
MIN.
1T73
24.0
33.3
32
88
1255
333
192
68
0.0
1250
7.0
2.0
3.0
0.5
13428
6290
355.0
MAX.
^TTS
24.0
33.3
34
114
1585
568
570
216
11.0
2000
7.5
3.9
4.7
0.6
19384
8126
920.0
UNIT OVERALL
47
8
19
28
5
6
-3
57
0
.8
.9
.5
.4
.0
.9
.3
.9
.7
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
v-1
H
r1
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
13
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
6/16/69 THROUGH II 3/69
FOR TEST WAS TF2
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 6/23/69 TO II 3/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* %REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM )
D.O. (MG/L )
TF.MPtDEG C)
BOD5(MG/L )
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDSIMG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SFTT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N1MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L)
SOLIDS (MG/L )
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE (ML/L )
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
22. 1( 11 )
24.01 11)
22. 1( 11)
6.3( 10)
34( 10)
147( 111
153( 11)
1889( 10)
520( 9)
398( 10)
20 1( 9)
5.1( 11)
169K 11)
7.8( 11)
14.11 6)
3.4( 6)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0.0( 0)
22. 1( 11 )
24.0( 11)
22. 1( 11 )
0.01 0)
31( 11)
851 10 )
0( 0)
1298( 11)
397(11 )
208( 11)
93( 11 )
0.7( 11)
1436( 11 )
7.8( 11)
14. 8( 3)
4.K 3)
0.6( 11)
17992( 10)
7039( 10)
850. 4( 11)
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
22. 2(
24.01
22. 2(
6.4(
35(
169(
14K
2287(
536(
380(
175(
4.0(
1825(
7.5(
14. 9(
3.3(
0.0(
0(
0(
0.0(
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
6)
6)
5)
4)
5)
4)
6)
6)
6)
3)
3)
0)
0)
0)
0)
22. 2(
24. 0(
22. 2(
0.0(
32(
87(
0(
1297(
389(
189(
70(
0.9(
1417(
7.5(
16. 8(
4.6(
0.6(
19420(
7485(
805. 8(
6)
6)
6)
0)
6)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
2)
2)
6)
5)
5)
6)
MIN.
22.2
24.0
22.2
28
65
1044
309
10
2
0.0
1150
6.8
11.3
2.4
0.4
17142
6481
310.0
MAX.
•MMHMBM
2272
24.0
22.2
34
107
1451
491
434
176
3.5
1700
8.4
22.4
6.8
1.3
26702
9976
940.0
UNIT
IMMBP*^"1-
48
43
27
50
60
22
1
-12
-36
.7
.2
.5
.3
.1
.3
.0
.5
.6
OVERALL
63.8
13.8
25.5
45.1
48.9
28.5
-1.5
1.0
15.2
Ul
-P-
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
w
Ul
H
vn
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
7/14/69 THROUGH 8/31/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
8/20/69 TO 8/31/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
OVERALL
PARAMFTFR
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C )
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA NIMG/L)
PHOSPHATE PIMG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L )
SOLIDS(MG/L )
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE (ML/L)
INFLUENT
0.01 0)
0.0(
0.0(
2.2<
36(
1981
0(
126K
48 3 (
356(
1671
3.2(
1534(
7.9(
9.81
2.7(
0.0(
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
13)
13)
17)
0)
17)
17)
17)
17)
14)
16)
15)
16)
14)
0)
0)
0)
0)
EFFLUENT
22. 1(16)
24. 0(
22. 1(
0.0(
32(
108(
0(
1146(
422(
89K
269(
1.4(
233K
7.6(
7.K
5.K
0.9(
99K
395(
36. 9(
16)
16)
0)
15)
17)
0)
16)
14)
17)
14)
14)
16)
15)
6)
6)
15)
16)
16)
14)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
2.6(
37 (
20K
0(
1268(
4901
442 (
235(
4.3(
1500(
7.9(
3.2(
2.4(
0.0(
0(
0(
0.0(
0
0
0
6
6
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
4)
6)
6)
6)
6)
0)
0)
0)
0)
EFFLUENT
22. 2( 6)
24. 0(
22. 2(
0.0(
32(
99 (
0(
1186(
403 (
1009(
469 (
2.K
1150(
7.6(
0.7(
2.3(
0.4(
1926(
700 (
47. 4(
6)
6)
0)
6)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
4)
4)
6)
6)
2)
2)
6)
5)
5)
5)
22.2
24.0
22.2
32
78
1081
351
44
50
1.0
900
7.3
0.1
2.3
0.2
96
60
5.0
MAX.
7TT?
24.0
22.2
33
140
1275
503
4932-
1452
3.0
1450
7.8
1.4
2.4
0.8
7340
2416
100.0
UNIT
50.6
6.4
17.8
128.3
-99.8
23.3
3.5
77.0
2.0
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
#INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1 15
(MEAO-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
9/ 1/69 THROUGH 10/12/69
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 10/ 1/69 TO 10/12/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM )
D.O.IMG/L)
TEMP(OEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDSIML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0(
0.0(
5.5(
35(
198(
0(
1259(
497 (
3111
162(
1.5(
1258(
8.K
12. 5(
2.1(
0.0(
0)
0)
14)
14)
16)
0)
16)
16)
16)
12)
16)
16)
16)
16)
15)
0)
EFFLUENT
14.7(16)
24. 0( 16)
74. 0( 16)
0.0( 0)
29(14)
46( 16)
0( 0)
1071(16)
362( 16)
21K 16)
116( 9)
0.7(16)
873(16)
7.6( 16)
1.8( 4)
1.3( 4)
0.5( 14)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
5.7(
34(
169(
0(
1157(
483(
296(
195(
2.K
801(
8.2(
10. 6(
2.6(
0.0(
0)
0)
0)
6)
6)
7)
0)
7)
7)
7)
4)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
0)
EFFLUENT
14. 7(
24. 0(
74. 0(
0.0(
29(
46(
0(
1079(
408 (
226(
200 (
1.2(
777 (
7.7(
2.8(
2.0(
0.4(
6}
6)
6)
0)
5)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
1
6
6
6
1
1)
5)
MIN.
7478
24.0
74.0
27
19
782
242
106
200
0.2
300
7.4
2.8
2.0
0.3
MAX.
TTTs
24.0
74.0
30
73
1315
581
502
200
4.0
1310
8.2
2.8
2.0
0.5
UNIT OVERALL
72
6
15
23
-2
3
6
73
25
.8
.7
.5
.6
.5
.0
.5
.6
.1
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP,
SLUDGE(ML/L)
0( 0) 16191(16) 0( 0) 1538K 6) 7898 27408
0( 0) 7614(16) 0( 0) 7299( 6) 4004 13123
0.0( 0) 913.3(15) 0.0( 0) 854.0( 5) 540.0 960.0
w
Ui
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
f
w
Ul
SUMMARY Of PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
16
INFLUENT SOURCE
TEST WAS FROM 10/13/69 THROUGH 12/19/69
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 12/ 1/69 TO 12/19/69
PARAMETER
FEFD(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
0.0. (MG/L)
TEMPtDEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA NJMG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF
DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* XREDUCTION*
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
5.H
32(
29 1(
0.0(
22891
11691
444 (
188(
3.7(
1805(
7.5(
13. 5(
3.2(
0)
0)
0)
25)
25)
27)
0)
27)
27)
27)
23)
27)
27)
27)
19)
18)
EFFLUENT
66.6
24.0
0.0
5.6
29
225
188.6
1869
750
497
241
5.7
1702
7.4
7.7
2.2
(27)
(27)
(27)
( 23)
(22)
(26)
(26)
( 25)
(25)
(24)
( 19)
(26)
(25)
( 26)
( 7)
( 7)
1NFL
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
5.K
31(
291(
0.0(
1802(
654(
326(
169(
2.K
1635(
7.3(
14. 4(
3.8(
UENT
0)
0)
0)
10)
10)
11 )
0)
11)
11)
11)
9)
11)
11)
11)
9)
8)
EFFLUENT
66.6
24.0
0.0
5.9
28
201
184.8
1705
612
302
159
3.3
1566
7.4
7.9
2.1
(11)
( 11)
( 11)
(10)
( 9)
( 11
(11
(11
( 11
(11
( 8
(11
( 11
(11
( 3
( 3
*" MIN.
66.7
24.0
0.0
5.3
26
162
155.0
1205
372
136
50
0.1
1090
6.6
1 1.1
1 0.4
MAX.
66.7
24.0
0.0
6.9
30
264
234.0
2077
1205
468
290
8.0
2200
8.5
13.2
3.9
UNlt
30.
5.
6.
7.
6.
4.
-0.
45.
45.
T OVERAL
• MMMMMHIMM
9
3
4
2
2
1
7
4
9
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
H
vn
-O
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1 17
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
I/ 5/70 THROUGH 3/ 8/70
FOR TEST WAS CL2
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 1/28/70 TO 2/20/70
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM )
O.O.IMG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L )
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
33. 2( 20)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
82( 18)
0( 0)
1984< 18)
713( 18 )
443< 18)
250< 18)
1.4< 18)
2608.1 18)
7.7( 18)
3.8( 4)
6.0( 3)
EFFLUENT
33.2(20 )
24.01 20)
0.0(20 )
3.3( 9)
13( 12)
83( 15)
0( 0)
1960( 15)
720( 15)
298( 15)
20K 15)
0.2( 15)
2369(15)
8.2( 15)
12. 1( 2)
6.3( 2)
D .0. (MG/L) 0.0(0) 1.7(3)
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED 933( 3) 0( 0)
VOLATILE SUSP. 537{ 3) 0( 0)
SLUDGE(ML/L) 20.0( 3) 0.0( 0)
INFLUENT
33.2(13)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
104(11)
0( 0)
219K 11)
808( 11)
547( 11)
293(11)
1.8( 11)
3137(11)
7.9( 11)
3.5( 3)
6.3( 2)
0.0( 0)
933( 3)
537( 3)
20. 0( 3)
EFFLUENT
33. 2( 13)
24. 0( 13)
0.0( 13)
3.9( 7)
12( 9)
98 ( 10)
Of 0)
2117(10)
78K 10)
337(10)
227( 10)
0.2(10)
2718( 10)
8.2( 10)
13. 1( 1)
7.7( 1)
1.0( 2)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0.0( 0)
44
33
24
0
1
Nrf
.0
.0
.0
4
53
1771
635
1
0
21
7
13
7
38
48
.0
50
.8
.1
.7
MAX.
24.0
0.0
9.6
25
141
2444
973
544
370
1.5
3200
9.1
UNI
5.
3.
3.
38.
22.
13.
-4.
13.1-270.
7.7
-22.
T
•
7
3
3
4
4
3
4
7
2
OVE
«••••
82
28
42
56
47
46
9
32
-45
RALL
.6
.8
.8
.3
.9
.5
.6
.3
.5
1.0
1.0
Ui
c»
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
I
00
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF1
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
18
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS TF2
3/ 9/70 THROUGH 5/ 1/70 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
4/13/70 TO 5/ 1/70
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMFTFR
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDSIML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L I
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
INFLUENT
33.2(22)
24.0(22)
33.2(22)
4.9(16)
30(16)
393(22)
377(22)
2660(22)
1130(22)
604( 21)
380(21)
2.1(22)
3921(22)
8.6(22)
18. 4( 6)
7.2( 6)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0.0( 0)
EFFLUENT
33.2(22)
24.0(22)
33.2(22)
0.0( 0)
28(16)
272(20 )
0( 0)
2390(22)
1022(22)
522( 21)
341(20)
2.3(22)
3682(22)
8.2(22)
9.K 5)
5.4( 5)
0.7( 16)
7567( 18)
1523(15)
30. 2( 18)
INFLUENT
33.2(11)
24. 0( 11)
33.2(11)
4.6( 9)
31( 9)
417( 11)
366{ 11)
2560( 11)
1147(11)
595( 11)
399(11)
2.5( 11)
3765(11)
8.4( 11)
18. 0( 2)
7.8( 2)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0.0( 0)
EFF .UENT
33.2(12)
24.0(12)
33.2(12)
0.0( 0)
30( 10)
273( 12)
0( 0)
2385(12)
1005(12)
510(11)
352( 10)
3.0(12)
3648( 12)
8.1(12)
6.0( 2)
5.6( 2)
0.7(10)
2323(12)
1359( 10)
19.5(12)
MIN.
ITS
24.0
33.3
27
235
1652
126
280
264
1.6
2780
7.6
2.1
3.9
0.6
536
268
10.0
MAX.
TC3
24.0
33.3
35
324
2836
1326
740
468
7.0
4100
8.4
9.9
7.3
2.6
6136
3280
40.0
UNIT OVERALL
34.6 56.9
6.8 9.3
12.3 20.6
14.2 -0.7
11.7 -8.8
3.0 20.8
3.9 11.2
66.6 55.1
28.2 36.6
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
TEST WAS FROM
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
6/10/68 THROUGH 7/28/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
7/15/68 TO 7/28/68
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
OVERALL
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
2.9(
37 (
2041
0(
1019(
33K
235(
109(
0.5(
1265(
7.6(
5.7(
0.8(
0)
0)
0)
8)
8)
15)
0)
13)
13)
14)
13)
10)
11)
12)
12)
12)
EFFLUENT
22.41
24. 0(
23. 8(
5.2(
33(
96(
84(
1062(
342(
273(
11 5(
0.6(
856(
7.2(
1.8 (
0.7(
15)
15)
15)
7)
8)
15)
7)
6)
6)
6)
6)
11)
13)
11)
12)
12)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0{
3.4(
39 (
223(
0(
105K
365(
258(
94(
1.0(
119K
7.6(
7.0(
0.7(
0)
0)
0)
3)
3)
7)
0)
6)
6)
7)
7)
4)
4)
7)
7)
7)
EFFLUENT
22. 1(
24. 0(
23. 3(
6. 1 (
35(
1041
81(
1142(
38 H
32K
126(
0.2(
821(
7.2(
2.6(
0.5(
5)
5)
5)
2)
2)
5)
4)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
4)
4)
5)
5)
MIN.
22.0
24.0
22.2
6.0
34
75
61
1068
316
248
98
0.1
740
6.9
0.8
0.3
MAX.
22.2
24.0
25.0
6.2
36
148
101
1184
414
400
174
0.3
875
7.4
5.2
1.1
UNIT
53
« Q
-4
-24
-34
31
5
62
31
.3
.6
.5
.2
.3
.0
.2
.4
.3
i
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
22.3? REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
63. 7? REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
g
tr1
«
ON
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST CL2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST UAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF TO TF2
6/10/68 THROUGH 7/28/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
7/15/68 TO 7/28/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM )
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE PIMG/L)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
2.9( 8)
37 ( 8)
204(
0(
1019(
33K
235(
109{
0.5(
12651
7.6(
5.7(
0.8(
15)
0)
13)
13)
14)
13)
10)
11)
12)
12)
12)
EFFLUENT
23. 1( 8)
0.01 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
35( 1)
84(
0(
906(
263(
129(
67(
O.K
557(
7.2(
2.2(
0.4(
7)
0)
8)
8)
8)
6)
3)
6)
7)
7)
7)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
3.4( 3)
39 ( 3)
223(
0(
105K
365(
258(
94 {
1.0<
119K
7.6(
7.0(
0.7(
7)
0)
6)
6)
7)
7)
4)
4)
7)
7)
7)
EFFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
81(
0(
942 (
276(
149 (
88 (
O.K
658(
7.2(
1.7(
0.4(
4)
0)
5)
5)
5)
3)
2)
3)
4)
4)
4)
MIN.
zzTo
61
814
233
90
57
0.1
450
7.1
1.1
0.2
MAX.
?2"72
101
1054
319
193
126
0. 1
775
7.4
2.5
0.9
UNIT OVERALL
63.7
10.3
24.4
42.2
6.5
44.7
4.9
74.9
43.8
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
#INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
7/29/68 THROUGH 8/18/68
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 8/12/68 TO 8/18/68
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(OEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS1MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* %REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
0.01
0.0(
0.0(
4.0(
37 (
195(
0(
1584(
5871
389<
147 (
0.4(
2126<
8.1'(
10. 1(
1.8<
0)
0)
0)
6)
6)
8)
0)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
5)
7)
6)
6)
EFFLUENT
22.41
24. 0(
0.0(
6.8(
33(
1591
104(
1447(
5141
456(
196(
5.5(
1710(
7.5(
4.8(
1.8<
8)
8)
8)
3)
6)
7)
6)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
6)
7)
7)
7)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
4.5(
36 (
193(
0(
1378(
5271
369(
144(
O.K
2050(
8.0(
5.4(
l.K
0)
0)
0)
3)
3)
4)
0)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
EFFLUENT
22. 2(
24. 0(
0.0(
8.5(
32(
1451
97 (
1330(
45H
414(
183(
6.0(
1530(
7.5(
1.8(
0.5(
3)
3)
3)
1)
2)
2)
3)
2)
2)
2)
2)
2)
2)
2)
2)
2)
MIN.
22.2
24.0
0.0
8.5
30
124
81
1158
359
254
118
4.0
1200
7.5
0.0
0.0
MAX.
22.2
24.0
0.0
8.5
33
165
113
1502
544
574
248
8.0
1860
7.6
3.7
1.1
UNI
ma^m
25.
3.
14.
-12.
-27.
25.
6.
66.
50.
T OVERALL
0
4
3
1
1
3
0
1
0
td
f
M
N3
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
32.83? REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
49.6% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
CO
H
CN
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST CL2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF TO TF2
7/29/68 THROUGH 8/18/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
8/12/68 TO 8/1R/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
OVERALL
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM )
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
4.0(
37 (
195(
0(
1584(
587 (
389(
147 (
0.4(
2126{
8.H
10. 1(
1.8(
6)
6)
8)
0)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
5)
7)
6)
6)
EFFLUENT
22. 2( 8)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0(
31(
104<
01
120K
415(
27K
134{
0.5(
1337(
7.4(
7.0(
1.5(
0)
5)
6)
0)
7)
7)
7)
7)
6)
6)
7)
7)
7)
INFLI
U • u (
0.0(
0.0(
4.5(
36 (
193(
0(
1378(
527(
369(
144<
O.H
2050(
8.0(
5.4(
l.K
JENT
0)
0)
0)
3)
3)
4)
0)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
FFFLUENT
MIN.
22. 2( 3) "2T72
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0(
30(
97(
0(
1148(
386(
217(
104(
0.6(
1228(
7.5(
4.8(
0.8(
0)
2)
3)
0)
3)
3)
3)
3)
2)
3)
3)
3)
3)
27
81
1015
333
174
76
0.5
1150
7.4
0.6
0.0
MAX.
•2775
33
113
1285
449
248
130
0.8
1345
7.8
9.0
2.1
UNIT
49.6
16.7
26.8
41.1
27.8
40.0
5.8
12.1
27.2
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
TEST WAS FROM
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE
8/19/68 THROUGH 9/ 8/68
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 8/21/68 TO 8/29/68
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDSIMG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA NIMG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
OVERALL
. INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0(
0.0(
2.H
39 (
180(
0(
1437(
58 H
386(
163(
5.4(
1668 (
8.4(
3.7(
3.0(
0)
0)
6)
6)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
EFFLUENT
44. 0( 6)
24. 0(
O.OJ
2.4(
33(
143(
1221
1420(
575(
384(
200 (
2.5(
1386(
7.5(
2.5(
1 .9 (
6)
6)
2)
1)
6)
4)
6)
6)
6)
6)
5)
6)
6)
6)
6)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0(
0.0(
2.4(
391
194(
0(
146K
609(
413(
147(
4.51
i796(
8.4(
3.4(
4.4(
0)
0)
4)
4)
4)
0)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
EFFLUENT
44. 0( 4)
24. 0(
0.0(
2.4(
33(
143(
122(
1398(
540(
385(
202 (
2.0(
1409 (
7.4(
1.4(
2.2(
4)
4)
2)
1)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
3)
4)
4)
4)
4)
MIN,.
TfTs
24.0
0.0
1.4
33
95
55
1133
390
322
186
0.3
995
7.2
0.0
0.3
MAX.
4T74
24.0
0.0
3.5
33
187
169
1569
682
454
212
3.0
1800
7.8
5.0
4.9
UNIT
26
4
11
6
-37
21
11
58
48
.0
.3
.3
.8
.6
.5
.8
.3
.8
H
OTHER BOO EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
15. Q% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
37. 2% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
w
<^
Ul
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST CL2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF TO TF2
8/19/68 THROUGH 9/ 8/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
8/21/68 TO 8/29/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD51MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDSIMG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE PIMG/L)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
2.K
39(
180(
01
1437(
58 1(
386(
163(
5.4(
1668{
8.4(
3.7(
3.0(
0)
0)
0)
6)
6)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
EFFLUENT INFL
44.41
0.01
0.0(
0.01
0(
122(
01
1459(
547(
51K
2441
6.0<
1529(
7.5(
3.5<
1.41
5)
0)
0)
0)
0)
4)
0)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
3)
3)
3)
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
2.4(
39(
194(
0(
146K
609(
413(
147(
4.5(
1796(
8.4(
3.4(
4.4(
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
2.4(
39(
194(
0(
146K
609(
413(
147(
4.5(
1796(
8.4(
3.4(
4.4(
0)
0)
0)
4)
4)
4)
0)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
EFFLUENT
44.41
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
0(
1221
0(
1459(
547 (
511(
2441
6.0(
1529(
7.5(
3.5(
1.4(
4)
0)
0)
0)
0)
4)
0)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
3)
3)
3)
MIN.
55
MAX.
44.4
UNIT OVERALL
169 37.2
970
341
271
128
0.1
1135
7.4
0.5
0.1
1781
658
896
424
14.0
1890
7.7
5.6
2.9
0.1
10.0
-23.5
-66.3
14.8
10.8
-3.1
65.9
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
TEST WAS FROM
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE
9/ 9/68 THROUGH 10/ 6/68
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 9/23/68 TO 10/ 6/68
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DFPTH(FT)
RnCYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
3.6(
38 (
20 5 <
0(
1286(
439 (
432(
173(
l.K
1617(
8.0{
6.6(
1.8(
0)
0)
0)
6)
6)
9)
0)
9)
9)
9)
9)
10)
8)
6)
7)
7)
EFFLUENT
23. 8(
16. 0(
25. 2(
5.8(
32(
1201
71(
1217(
385(
374(
176(
5.2(
1180(
7.4(
3.4(
1.7(
10)
10)
10)
4)
5)
9)
8)
10)
10 )
10)
10)
9)
10)
10)
9)
9)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.01
0.0(
4.2(
38(
2091
01
1269(
431(
420(
172(
1.5(
15551
8.0(
6.6(
1.8(
0)
0)
0)
5)
5)
7)
0)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
6)
7)
7)
EFFLUENT
23. 3(
16. 0(
22. 1(
5.7(
331
125(
89(
11441
356(
330(
172(
5.3(
1104(
7.3(
3.3(
1.4(
5)
5)
5)
3)
3)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
MIN.
22.2
16.0
22.0
4.6
32
99
77
1044
317
204
78
0.3
900
7.3
0.0
0.8
MAX.
TO)
16.0
22.2
6.5
34
153
117
1325
428
492
222
7.5
1375
7.4
7.6
2.3
UNIT OVERALL
40
9
17
21
0
29
8
50
20
.2
.8
.5
.3
.1
.0
.8
.4
.9
i
w
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
28.6% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
57.3% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
I
f
M
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2 5
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
TEST WAS FROM 10/ 7/68 THROUGH 10/27/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM 10/14/68 TO 10/27/68
PARAME
X££.
GPM
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
EFFLUENT* INFLUENT EFFLUENT HIM. MAX. UNIT
14.VI §\ o.AI 61 14.71 5\ T478 TTTs
0
0.0
0.0
5.5
36
207
0
1328
471
399
180
1.1
1596
6.8
15.0
1.4
(
(
(
(
(
(
{
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
0)
0)
6)
5)
9)
0)
8)
8)
9)
9)
8)
7)
8)
9)
9)
16. 0(
28. 4(
5.K
32(
115(
72 (
1280(
418(
408 (
195(
10. 7(
1272(
7.4{
3.6(
1 .9 (
9)
9)
6)
6)
9)
9)
8)
8)
9)
9)
9)
9)
8)
8)
8)
0.0(
0.0(
5.3(
36 (
200 (
0(
1334(
464 (
413(
179(
1.4(
1675(
7.8(
4.4(
l.K
0)
0)
4)
3)
6)
0)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
6)
6)
16. 0(
27. 5(
5.0(
33(
118(
74 (
1295(
424 (
390(
185(
14. 2(
1230(
7.4(
3.K
1.5(
5)
5)
4)
4)
5)
5)
4)
4)
5)
5)
5)
5)
4)
4)
4)
16.0
19.6
1.8
31
88
47
1250
396
236
112
6.0
750
7.3
1.3
1.1
16.0
29.6
6.5
34
153
98
1318
462
486
232
40.0
1500
7.5
4.2
2.4
41.1
2.8
8.6
5.4
-3.2
26.5
5.6
29.4
-36.7
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
37.3% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
63.1% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2 6
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
TEST WAS FROM 10/28/68 THROUGH 11/17/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM ll/ 6/68 TO 11/17/68
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDSIMG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDSIML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
0.01
0.01
0.0(
6.0(
36(
224(
01
1413(
579(
493(
206 (
1.4(
2219(
8.4(
11. 8(
2.2(
0)
0)
0)
6)
6)
8)
0)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
7)
8)
8)
EFFLUENT
14.71
24. 0(
29. 5 <
4.8(
261
132(
81(
1315(
474<
447 (
217(
7.6(
1600(
7.5(
6.7(
1.8{
8)
8)
8)
5)
4)
8)
8)
7)
7)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
6.3(
36(
216(
0(
1405(
569(
484(
202(
1.6(
2182(
8.4(
12. 7(
2.2(
6)
0)
0)
5)
5)
7)
0)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
7)
6)
7)
7)
EFFLUENT
14.71
24. 0(
29. 5(
5.01
26(
145(
85(
1375(
504(
507 (
244 (
9.3(
1738(
7.5(
7.0(
1.9(
6)
6)
6)
4)
4)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
MIN.
T4?8
24.0
29.6
4.5
24
120
70
1096
336
246
52
0.4
1400
7.1
2.3
1.0
MAX.
TTTS
24.0
29.6
6.1
28
172
94
1648
594
782
370
30.0
2300
8.4
9.7
2.8
UNIT OVERALL
32
2
11
-4
-20
20
10
44
14
.7
. 1
.4
.6
.9
.3
.4
.6
.3
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
41.32 REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
60.5% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
oo
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
"VINDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
w
0>
VO
CN
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2 7
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
TEST WAS FROM 11/18/68 THROUGH 12/ 6/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM 11/25/68 TO 12/ 6/68
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDSJML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
INFL
0.0(
0.01
0.0(
3.9<
35(
239(
0(
1328(
4791
439(
177(
l.K
2203(
7.8(
8.5(
1.6(
UENT
0)
0)
0)
7)
6)
10)
0)
10)
10)
10)
10)
8)
8)
10)
10)
10)
EFFLUENT
24. 0{
22. 9(
5.5(
241
160(
82(
1648<
563(
700 {
312{
17. 9(
1868(
7.3(
6.5(
1.9<
10)
10)
5)
5)
10)
9)
10)
10)
10)
10)
9)
10)
10)
10)
10)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
3.3<
35(
229(
0(
1090(
390(
353<
155(
0.6(
1788(
7.5(
6.1(
1.8<
0)
0)
0)
3)
3)
5)
0)
5)
5)
5)
5)
4)
4)
5)
5)
5)
EFFLUENT
22. 2( 5)
24. 0(
22. 2(
5.7(
25(
162(
79(
1670(
562 (
696 (
326(
23. 0(
1860(
7.4(
4.7(
1.7(
5)
5)
3)
3)
5)
4)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
MIN,
T2T2
24.0
22.2
5.6
23
122
30
1557
466
504
234
7.0
1550
7.3
1.9
1.0
MAX.
7T2
24.0
22.2
5.9
27
188
103
1876
671
1062
486
65.0
2400
7.5
6.4
3.3
UNIT OVERALL
29
-53
-44
-97
-109
-4
1
22
3
.1
.1
.2
.1
.3
.0
.8
.3
.2
OTHER BOO EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
51.2% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
65.4% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
*INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
o\
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
2/ 3/69 THROUGH 3/ 9/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
2/26/69 TO 3/ 9/69
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMPIDEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
6.31
31(
285(
0(
1887(
622(
462(
149(
5.7(
2142(
7.4C
6.5(
2.5(
0)
0)
0)
11)
11)
12)
0)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
11)
11)
11)
EFFLUENT
33. 2(
24. 0(
33. 2(
4.K
24(
209(
167(
1818(
575(
460 (
192(
3.7(
1994(
7.6(
2.6(
1. 7(
12)
12)
12)
9)
9)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
4)
4)
INFL1
u * u
0.0
0.0
6.3
32
295
0
1855
704
491
203
4.1
2142
7.5
r
i
(
i
(
<
<
(
(
<
(
<
<
<
8.4(
2.6
t
JENT
"oT
0)
0)
6)
6)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
EFFLUENT
33 • 2 t
24. 0(
33. 2(
3.9(
26(
178(
140(
1704(
656(
438 (
210(
3.6(
1847(
7.4(
3.2(
2.2(
6T
6)
6)
4)
4)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
2)
2)
MIN.
TfT^
24.0
33.3
1.0
24
142
124
1566
451
316
140
1.0
1500
7.2
1.4
2.0
MAX.
24.0
33.3
5.4
28
232
175
2080
1140
540
290
7.0
2750
7.8
5.0
2.5
UNIT
39.5
8.1
6.7
10.8
-3.5
13.7
0.6
61.9
14.0
i
f
M
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
21.IX REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
52.3% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
w
*J
TEST WAS FROM
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
3/10/69 THROUGH 4/ 6/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
3/17/69 TO 4/ 6/69
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.IMG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0(
0.01
5.91
3U
212(
0(
1989(
644(
543 (
242(
6.8(
1798(
7.6(
7.6(
2.9(
0)
0)
13)
13)
16)
0)
15)
15)
15)
15)
15)
15)
11)
11)
11)
EFFLUENT
44. 3( 16)
24. 0(
22. li
5.0(
28(
173(
13K
1628(
524(
424(
200(
4.K
1605(
7.2(
4. 1(
1 . 8 (
16)
16)
13)
13)
16)
16)
16)
16)
15)
15)
16)
16)
15)
4)
4)
INFL
6.61
0.0(
0.0(
5.7(
311
207(
0(
1808(
593(
538(
26K
7.2(
1773(
7.7(
7.4(
2.9(
UENT
0
0
0
9
9
12)
0)
11)
11)
11)
11)
11)
11)
9)
9)
9)
EFFLUENT
44.3
24.0
22.11
5.0
281
1711
132
15951
5141
4141
195(
3.8<
1600(
7.21
4.41
2.1
12)
12)
12)
10)
10)
12)
12)
12)
12)
11)
11)
12)
12)
12)
3)
3)
44.4
24.0
22.2
3.2
25
129
89
1351
347
178
54
1.5
1100
6.9
2.4
1.7
MAX.
TO
24.0
22.2
5.8
30
207
166
1968
690
684
294
7.5
2100
7.9
5.6
2.6
UNIT
17
11
13
23
25
9
6
40
29
.6
.8
.3
.1
.2
.7
.0
.0
.7
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
22.8?! REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
36.4% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
TEST WAS FROM
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
10
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
4/14/69 THROUGH 5/ 4/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
4/21/69 TO 5/ 4/69
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
5.41
32(
245(
0(
15251
5741
284(
166(
0.8(
1644(
7.7(
8.1(
2.8(
0)
0)
0)
6)
6)
8)
0)
8)
8)
7)
7)
8)
8)
7)
7)
7)
EFFLUENT
29. 5 (
24. 0(
14. 7(
4.3(
29 (
164(
138(
1449(
514(
237(
144(
4.9(
1438(
7.4(
6.2(
2.3(
8)
8)
8)
6)
5)
8)
8)
8)
8)
7)
6)
8)
8)
8)
2)
2)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
O.CM
5.3(
33(
212(
0(
147K
548 (
294(
168(
1.0(
1508(
7.6(
9.6(
2.9(
0)
0)
0)
5)
5)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
5)
EFFLUENT
29. 5(
24. 0(
14. 7(
3.71
29(
146 (
12K
1399(
492 (
242 (
144 (
5.0(
1325(
7.3(
6.21
2.3(
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
2)
2)
MIN.
29.6
24.0
14.8
0.0
28
105
90
1240
343
82
44
0.0
900
7.2
6.0
1.7
MAX.
29.6
24.0
14.8
5.0
30
183
168
1640
700
468
278
15.0
1700
7.4
6.5
3.0
UNIT OVERALL
31
4
10
17
14
12
4
34
21
.1
.8
.2
.5
.0
.1
.7
.8
.6
i
f
M
-j
S3
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
17.2% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
43.0% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
g
f
w
VJ
U)
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2 11
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS TF1
5/ 5/69 THROUGH 5/25/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
5/14/69 TO 5/25/69
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVE-RAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
22. 1( 12)
24.0(12)
22.1(12)
0.0( 0)
26( 12)
64(11)
0( 0)
1310(12)
363(12)
247(12)
110( 12)
1.7(12)
1142( 12)
7.3(12)
9.K 3)
1.6( 3)
EFFLUENT
22l.lllM
24. 0( 12)
22. 1(
7.2(
24(
143(
46(
1326(
388(
285(
164(
3.6(
1102(
7.5(
3.9(
1.7(
12)
12)
12)
11)
11)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
12)
3)
3)
INFLUENT
55.51 Al
24. 0( 4)
22. 2(
0.0(
26(
62(
0(
1315(
382(
265(
135(
1 . 6(
1163(
7.3(
7.6(
1.6(
4)
0)
4)
3)
0)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
1)
1)
EFFLUENT
22. 21 6\
24. 0( 6)
22. 2(
7.4(
25(
215(
58 (
1419(
420(
336(
173(
3.6(
1200(
7.4(
4.0(
1.8 (
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
2)
2)
MIN.
24^0
22.2
7.4
23
138
51
1330
380
244
142
2.5
1050
7.4
2.2
1.5
MAX.
7272
24.0
22.2
7.6
28
UNIT
314-246
67
1562
492
422
210
5.0
1300
7.7
5.9
2.2
-7
-9
-27
-27
-3
w 1
46
-15
.7
.8
.6
.1
.4
.2
.4
.7
.6
OVERA
-8.8
9.1
20.6
15.3
3.7
35.0
-2.5
65.4
38.6
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
73.IS! REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
6.7$ REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
70.7* REMOVAL OF PF TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
TEST WAS FROM
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
12
INFLUENT SOURCE
5/26/69 THROUGH 6/15/69
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 6/ 2/69 TO 6/15/69
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA KMMG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* %REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.01
3.2(
36(
1671
0(
1537(
5481
404(
152(
2.0(
1643(
7.0.(
7.5(
3.4(
0)
0)
0)
8)
8)
10)
0)
9)
9)
9)
9)
10)
10)
8)
8)
8)
EFFLUENT
33.21
24. 0(
33.21
5.3(
33(
135(
99 (
1495(
482(
409 (
180(
5.21
14371
7.4(
5.8(
3. 11
10 )
10)
10)
8)
8)
10)
10)
9)
9)
9)
9)
10)
10)
10)
3)
3)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
3.51
37(
194(
0(
1607(
5651
487(
169(
2.3(
1813(
7.01
7.0(
3.8(
0)
0)
0)
4)
4)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
5)
EFFLUENT
33. 2(
24. 0(
33. 2(
5.3<
33(
133(
981
15121
487 (
42K
176(
5.0(
1528(
7.5(
5.3(
3.2(
8)
8)
8)
6)
6)
8)
8)
7)
7)
7)
7)
8)
8)
8)
2)
2)
MIN.
33.3
24.0
33.3
4.0
31
74
60
1372
417
322
116
4.0
1250
7.2
3.9
3.2
MAX.
33.3
24.0
33.3
6.7
35
170
142
1669
542
590
236
7.0
2020
8.8
6.8
3.2
UNIT OVERALL
^fm^^a* _^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
31
5
13
13
-4
15
~6
23
17
.5
.8
.7
.4
.3
.7
.7
.7
.5
r1
w
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
26.2% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
49.5% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
w
tn
TEST WAS FROM
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2 13
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE
6/16/69 THROUGH 7/ 3/69
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 6/23/69 TO 7/ 3/69
PARAMETFR
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* %REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0(
0.0(
5.8(
37 (
232(
0(
149K
524{
38K
17K
3.K
1800 (
7.8(
17. 6(
5.H
0)
0)
10)
10)
11)
0)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
7)
7)
7)
EFFLUENT
22.1(11)
24. 0(
22. 1(
6.3(
34<
147(
153(
1889(
520(
398(
20 1(
5.K
169K
7.8(
14. 1(
3.4(
11)
11)
10)
10)
11)
11)
10)
9)
10)
9)
11)
11)
11)
6)
6)
INFLUENT
0.01 0)
0.0(
0.0<
5.8(
38(
240 (
0(
1506(
522(
344<
137(
0.9(
19831
7.4(
17. 0(
5.4(
0)
0)
6)
6)
7)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
4)
4)
4)
EFFLUENT MIN.
22. 2(
24. 0(
22. 2(
6.4(
35(
169{
141(
2287(
536(
380(
175(
4.0(
1825(
7.5(
14. 9(
3.3(
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
6)
6)
5)
4)
5)
4)
6)
6)
6)
3)
3)
22.2
24.0
22.2
5.4
33
102
98
1479
469
120
72
2.0
1300
7.2
9.8
2.1
MAX.
22.2
24.0
22.2
7.5
37
226
180
5230
609
778
282
8.0
2500
8.2
21.4
4.9
UNIT OVERALL
29
-51
-2
-10
-28
7
-2
12
37
.4
.8
.8
.5
.0
.9
.7
.0
.9
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
16.9% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
41.4% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
H
-3
VJ1
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2 14
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS TF1
7/14/69 THROUGH 8/31/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
8/20/69 TO 8/31/69
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
22.11 16)
24. 0(
22. 1(
0.0(
32(
108 (
0(
1146(
422(
89K
2691
1.4(
233K
7.6(
7.K
5.K
16)
16)
0)
15)
17)
0)
16)
14)
17)
14)
14)
16)
15)
6)
6)
EFFLUENT
22.1(16)
24.01
22. 1(
6.4(
29(
74(
49 (
1158(
3841
310(
1701
3.K
11441
7.6(
3.8(
3.7(
16)
16)
14)
14)
17)
17)
15)
15)
15)
13)
15)
16)
15)
4)
4)
INFLUENT
22. 2( 6)
24. 0(
22.21
0.0(
32 (
99 (
0(
1186(
403(
1009(
469(
2.K
1150(
7.6(
0.7(
2.3(
6)
6)
0)
6)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
4)
4)
6)
6)
2)
2)
EFFLUENT
22. 2( 6)
24. 0(
22. 2(
6.4<
28 (
52 (
31(
1192(
377 (
379 (
190(
4.9(
992(
7.6{
1.5(
2.4(
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
5)
6)
6)
2)
2)
MINI.
22T2
24.0
22.2
5.6
27
44
26
1025
312
214
92
3.0
600
7.5
0.6
2.1
MAX.
~2
24.0
22.2
8.3
29
72
34
1386
486
638
336
9.0
1250
7.8
2.4-
2.8
UNIT
47.3
-0.5
6.3
62.4
59.4
13.7
-0.4
100.0
-4.2
OVERALL
73.9
5.9
23.0
14.3
19.0
33.8
3.1
54.0
-2.0
H
I
W
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
41.5* REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
69.1$ REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
84.7$ REMOVAL OF PF TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
TEST WAS FROM
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2 15
(MEAO-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE
9/ 1/69 THROUGH 10/12/69
FOR TEST WAS CL2
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 10/ 1/69 TO 10/12/69
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* %REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
66. 6 ( 16)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
26(16)
0( 0)
1011(16)
322(16)
137(16)
107( 6)
0.6( 16)
464(16)
7.5(16)
1.7( 4)
0.7( 4)
EFFLUENT
66. 6( 16)
24.0(16)
0.0(16)
6.7( 14)
26(14)
42(16)
25( 16)
1020( 16)
333(16)
134( 16)
12K 5)
1.0( 16)
497( 16)
7.7( 16)
0.6( 4)
1.0( 4)
INFLUENT
66. 6(
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
0(
18(
0(
988(
348(
85(
86 (
O.K
339(
7.4(
0.4(
1.0(
TT
0)
0)
0)
0)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
1)
6)
6)
6)
2)
2)
EFFLUENT
66. 6\
24. 0(
0.0(
6.4(
25(
25(
16(
1044 (
347 (
1 13 (
72 (
1 .2 (
413(
7.5(
0.5(
1.4(
6T
6)
6)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
2)
6)
6)
6)
2)
2)
MIN.
ZTT7
24.0
0.0
3.5
23
20
12
896
274
82
50
0.2
280
7.1
0.0
0.6
MAX.
24.0
0.0
7.7
27
40
29
1207
423
138
94
2.0
650
7.8
1.0
2.2
UNIT OVERALL
-34.5 85.3
-5.7 9.7
0.1 28.1
•32.5 61.8
16.0 63.0
-21.8 48.3
-1.5 8.3
-25.0 95.2
•33.3 47.5
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
34.4% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
11.8% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
90.4% REMOVAL OF PF TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2 16
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE
TEST WAS FROM 10/13/69 THROUGH 12/19/69
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 12/ 1/69 TO 12/19/69
PARAMFTFR
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE PJMG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0(
0.01
5.K
32(
2911
0(
2289(
1169(
444 (
1881
3.7(
18051
7.5.(
13.51
3.2(
0)
0)
25)
25)
27)
0)
27)
27)
27)
23)
27)
27)
27)
19)
18)
EFFLUENT INFLUENT EFFLUENT MIN. MAX.
66.6(27) 0.0( 0) 66.6(11) 66.7 66.7
24. 0(
0.0(
5.8(
29(
253(
207(
1967(
851(
988(
303(
7.9(
1793(
7.3(
12. 3(
3.6(
27)
27)
24)
24)
27)
27)
27)
27)
27)
23)
27)
26)
27)
7)
7)
0.0(
0.0(
5.K
31(
29K
0(
1802(
654(
326(
169(
2.1(
1635(
7.3(
14. 4(
3.8(
0)
0)
10)
10)
11)
0)
11)
11)
11)
9)
11)
11)
11)
9)
8)
24. 0(
0.0(
6.1(
28 (
244 (
18K
1947(
750(
873(
286(
8.9(
1667(
7.5(
14. 9(
5.2(
11)
11)
10)
10)
11)
11)
11)
11)
11)
9)
11)
11)
11)
3)
3)
24.0
0.0
5.4
26
159
144
1410
403
174
60
2.5
1120
6.9
6.6
3.9
24.0
0.0
6.8
30
489
236
3098
1532
2344-
810
26.0
2480
8.6
30.4
7.6
UNIT OVERALL
16
-8
-14
167
-68
-2
-2
-3
-35
.1
.0
.7
.8
.5
.0
.2
.1
.4
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
25.885 REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
37.7% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
oo
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
SINDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
tr"
w
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2 17
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
I/ 5/70 THROUGH 3/ 8/70 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
2/12/70 TO 3/ 8/70
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* %REDUCTION*
OVERALL
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
JNFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
2.6(
30 (
472(
0(
2686(
121K
714(
389(
0.6(
4410 (
8.9(
24. 0(
6.3(
0)
0)
0)
14)
14)
20)
0)
20)
20)
20)
20)
20)
20)
20)
19)
16)
EFF
.UENT
66.6(20)
24.0(20)
0.0(20)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
7.2(15) 1.3(
25(15)
389(20)
389< 20)
2435(20)
1050(20)
616(20)
33
1(20)
1.7( 20)
3643(20)
8.6(20)
24. 3( 6)
6.7( 6)
29 (
53K
0(
281K
135K
788(
428(
0.7(
4732(
8.8(
14. 8(
6.8(
0)
0)
0)
6)
6)
9)
0)
9)
9)
9)
9)
9)
9)
9)
8)
9)
EFFLUENT
66. 6(
24. 0(
0.0(
8.4(
24(
49 1(
462 (
2843 (
1365(
747 (
420 (
2.7(
4603 (
8.6(
15. 4(
6.2(
8)
8)
8)
7)
7)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
2)
2)
MINf
66.7
24.0
0.0
3.5
20
161
170
1713
557
438
208
0.3
1920
7.9
12.8
6.0
MAX.
66.7
24.0
0.0
10.0
28
961
961
4634
2545
1322
770
9.0
8500
9.7
18.1
6.5
UNIT
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST TF2
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
18
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
3/ 9/70 THROUGH 5/ 1/70
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 4/13/70 TO 5/ 1/70
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C )
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0(
0.0(
1 . 3(
32(
594(
0(
2599(
1216(
580(
34K
0.5(
4509(
9.2(
23. 9(
10. 2(
0)
0)
16)
16)
22)
0)
22)
22)
21)
21)
22)
22)
22)
18)
18)
33.2(22)
24.0(22)
33.2(22)
4.9( 16)
30(16)
393(22)
377(22)
2660( 22)
1130(22)
604( 21)
380(21)
2.1(22)
3921(22)
8.6( 22)
18. 4( 6)
7.2( 6)
INFL
U • U I
0.0(
0.0(
1 .0(
34(
634(
0(
2632(
1266(
507(
324(
0.7(
4607 (
9.K
13. 3(
8.8(
UEN1
"oT
0)
0)
10)
10)
12)
0)
12)
12)
11)
11)
12)
12)
12)
8)
8)
' EFFLU
3372(
24. 0(
33. 2(
4.6(
31(
417(
366 (
2560(
1147(
595(
399 (
2.5(
3765(
8.4(
18. 0(
7.8(
ENT
TTT
11)
11)
9)
9)
11)
11)
11)
11)
11)
11)
11)
11)
11)
2)
2)
MIN.
24.0
33.3
3.2
27
304
259
2155
950
296
168
0.5
2780
8.0
17.9
6.0
MAX.
33T3
24.0
33.3
5.2
36
704
449
2840
1360
932
752
7.2
4600
8.7
18.1
9.6
imm
34
2
9
-17
-23
18
7
-34
11
«J OVERALL
.2
.7
.3
.4
.3
.2
.6
.4
.7
H
I
8
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
12.1% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
42.1% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
'^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
w
00
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST AL
(MEAO-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
6/17/68 THROUGH 7/28/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
7/ 3/68 TO 7/28/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L )
MIXED
SETTLED
SOL IDS (MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
2.9( 8)
37 ( 8)
204( 15)
0( 0)
1019(13)
331(13)
235( 14)
109(13)
0.5( 10)
1265( 11)
7.6(12)
5.7( 12)
0.8(12)
EFFLUENT
41.4(15)
6.7(15)
0.0(14)
3.4( 4)
28( 10)
65(15)
0( 0)
1050( 6)
31K 6)
248( 6)
124( 5)
4.6( 5)
1082(13)
7.4( 11)
1.4(12)
l.K 12)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
2.7( 5)
37 ( 5)
220(10)
0( 0)
1072( 9)
363( 9)
239( 10)
110(10)
0.8( 6)
1309( 7)
7.6( 10)
6.0(10)
0.8( 10)
EFFLUENT
41. 6( 10
6.7(10
0.0( 9
3.4( 2
30( 5
67( 10)
0( 0)
1050( 6)
31K 6)
248 ( 6)
124( 5)
5.7( 4)
1113( 9)
7.4( 9)
1.5( 10)
0.9(10)
MIM.
40.6
6.7
2.5
27
29
913
249
96
50
0.2
550
7.3
0.4
0.3
MAX.
43.5
6.7
4.3
31
135
1303
361
440
184
14.0
2250
7.9
3.6
2.0
UNIT OVERALL
^^"*™ •"••"••^"
69.7
2.0
14.2
-3.7
-12.9
14.9
2.6
73.8
-13.0
D.O.(MG/L)
0.0( 0)
3.2(10)
0.0( 0)
2.7( 5)
1.9 4.0
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
'^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
H
CO
H
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST AL
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
7/29/68 THROUGH 9/ 8/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
8/21/68 TO 9/ 8/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* %REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM )
D.O.
-------
f
w
00
CO
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST AL
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
9/ 9/68 THROUGH 10/20/68
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 10/11/68 TO 10/20/68
AVERAGE OF ALL
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDSIMG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
4.6( 11)
37 ( 10)
205(15)
0( 0)
1305(14)
454( 14)
423(15)
174( 15)
l.K 15)
1624( 12)
7.K 11)
13. 2( 13)
1.7(13)
DATA
EFFLUENT
30 . 2 (
6.7(
0.0(
6.0(
22(
94(
0(
1335(
439(
57K
316(
28. 5(
1296(
7.6(
0.8(
2.4(
17)
17)
17)
15)
14)
16)
0)
16)
16)
14)
14)
17)
16)
16)
17)
17)
EDITED DATA AVERAGE
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
5.4(
36 (
187(
0(
1318(
458(
432(
179(
1. 5(
1783(
7.5(
4.K
0.9(
0)
0)
0)
4)
3)
4)
0)
3)
3)
4)
4)
4)
3)
3)
4)
4)
EFFLUENT
30. 2(
6.7(
0.0(
5.3(
23(
105(
0(
137K
464 (
503(
254(
35. 6(
1516(
7.7(
l.K
2.K
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
0)
4)
4)
4)
4)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
EFFLUENT* %R
MIN.
30.3
6.7
4.2
19
88
1275
398
378
228
21.0
1175
7.6
0.2
1.2
MAX.
3^*3
6.7
6.4
25
148
1490
524
640
302
54.0
1880
7.9
1.6
3.6-
EDUCTION*
UNIT OVERALL
43
_ "2
-1
-16
-42
14
-2
72
119
.9
.9
.2
.5
.1
.9
.0
.6
.9
D.O. (MG/L)
0.0( 0)
5.8(15) 0.0( 0)
5.0( 5)
3.8
6.4
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
H
C»
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST AL 4
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
TEST WAS FROM 10/21/68 THROUGH 12/ 6/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM 11/25/68 TO 121 6/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* %REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(MLXL)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
4.9(
35(
230(
0(
1357(
514(
451(
189(
1.2(
2105(
8.K
9.0(
1.8(
0)
0)
0)
14)
13)
21 )
0)
21)
21)
21)
21)
19)
19)
20)
21 )
21)
EFFLUENT
40.6(20)
6.7(20)
0.0(20)
6.5( 19)
17(19)
153(21)
0( 0)
1517( 21)
544(21)
646 ( 21)
316(21)
34. 5( 18)
1522(20)
7.4(20)
1.7(20)
1.8( 20)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
3.3(
35(
229(
0(
1090(
390(
353(
1551
0.6(
1788(
7.5(
6.1(
1.8(
0)
0)
0)
3)
3)
5)
0)
5)
5)
5)
5)
4)
4)
5)
5)
5)
EFFLUENT
41. 0(
6.7(
0.0(
7.0(
16(
149(
0(
1649(
5581
688(
334(
56. 0(
17501
7.3(
0.9(
1.7(
-» -^ /
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
6)
0)
6)
6)
6)
6)
3)
5)
6)
6)
6)
r- \
MIN.
41.0
6.7
6.6
13
131
1572
512
604
240
50.0
1550
7.3
0.0
1.1
s f\
MAX.
41.0
6.7
7.5
17
167
1736
623
786
410-
60.0
1850
7.5
2.0
3.0
I ~J
UNIT OVERALL
34
-51
-43
-95
114
2
2
84
3
.7
.2
.2
.0
.8
.0
.1
.6
.0
D.O.(MG/L)
0.0( 0)
6.5(19)
0.0( 0)
i
f
w
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
I
M
00
Ui
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST AL
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
21 3/69 THROUGH 3/30/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
3/10/69 TO 3/30/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
OVERALL
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DFPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOOS (MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE PIMG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
6.11
31(
249 (
0(
1993(
647 (
485(
161(
7.2(
2040 {
7.5(
7.0(
2.8(
0)
0)
0)
21)
21)
24)
0)
23)
23)
23)
23)
23)
23)
18)
18)
18)
EFFLUENT
24.3(16)
6.7(
0.0(
6.5(
14(
57(
42 (
1402(
413(
208(
112(
0.4(
1058(
6.9(
3.9(
1.0(
16)
16)
15)
15)
17)
16)
16)
16)
15)
15)
16)
16)
15)
6)
6)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
5.8( 9)
31( 9)
220( 11)
0( 0)
1883( 10)
560(10)
514( 10)
183(10)
8.3( 10)
1993(10)
7.6( 7)
7.7( 7)
3.3( 7)
EFFLUENT MIN.
24. 3(
6.7(
0.0(
6.4(
14(
50(
39(
1393(
390(
20K
108 (
0.3(
1019(
7.4(
6.3(
l.K
9
9
9
8
8
9
9
9
9
8
24.4
6.7
4.8
12
37
33
1283
325
106
8) 26
9) 0.1
9) 800
8) 7.1
3) 3.4
3) 0.8
MAX.
^474
6.7
8.7
16
73
51
1447
451
268
174
1.0
1200
7.8
9.5
1.6
UNIT
77
26
30
60
41
48
2
18
65
.3
.0
.3
.8
.1
.8
.3
.2
.6
[MG/L )
0.0( 0)
6.2(15)
0.0( 0)
5.9( 8) 4.5
7.0
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
22.0% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
82.3% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
H
03.
vn
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST AL
(MEAO-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
3/31/69 THROUGH 5/ 4/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
4/23/69 TO 5/ 4/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM )
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMPIDEG C)
BOD5(MG/L )
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.Sf)LIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE PIMG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
5.4(
32(
229(
0(
1570(
57 1(
406(
25K
0.8(
158K
7.7(
8. 11
2.71
0)
0)
0)
10)
10)
13)
0)
13)
13)
12)
12)
13)
13)
12)
12)
12)
EFFLUENT
30.3(13)
6.7( 13)
0.0{ 13)
4.4( 11)
19(11)
75( 13)
39( 13)
1509( 13)
495(13)
37K 13)
21K 13)
9.9( 13)
1252( 13)
7.4( 13)
4.5( 3)
2.2( 3)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
5. 1(
33(
213(
0(
1466(
564(
299(
169(
1.2(
1500(
7.7(
9.7(
3.0(
0)
0)
0)
4)
4)
5)
0)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
4)
4)
4)
EFFLUENT
30. 3(
6.7(
0.0(
3.6(
21(
79(
38(
1502(
512(
339(
224(
13. 9(
1250(
7.4(
5.0(
2.4(
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
2)
2)
MIN.
30.4
6.7
2.5
19
72
30
1354
481
46
6
6.5
950
7.4
3.7
2.1
MAX.
30.4
6.7
5.7
22
86
46
1707
603
602
368
26.0
1600
7.6
6.4
2.8
UNIT OVERALL
62
-2
9
-13
-33
16
3
48
20
.9
.4
.2
.4
.0
.6
.1
.2
.3
D.O. (MG/L )
0.0( 0)
4.5( 11)
0.0( 0)
3.7( 5)
2.4
6.0
i-3
f
oo
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
51.38! REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
81.9* REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
'INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
g
IT"
w
oo
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
AL
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
5/ 5/69 THROUGH 5/25/69
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 5/ 5/69 TO 5/25/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
OVERALL
PARAMFTFR
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
6.5( 11)
32( 11)
206( 11)
0( 0)
1503(12)
500(12)
329(12)
152( 12)
0.7(12)
1628( 12)
7.3(12)
12. 4( 12)
3.2(12)
0.0( 0)
EFFLUENT
40. 5( 12)
6.7( 12)
0.0(12)
2.0( 12)
24(12)
107( 10)
46( 11)
1523( 12)
463( 12)
530( 10)
26K 10)
30. 7( 12)
1438( 12)
7.4( 12)
6.5( 3)
2.4( 3)
1.7( 12)
"TiTFTuTNT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
6.5( 11)
32( 11)
206( 11)
0( 0)
1503( 12)
500(12)
329( 12)
152(12)
0.7( 12)
1628(12)
7.3( 12)
12.4(12)
3.2( 12)
0.0( 0)
E^rlYS,!7,,
40. 5( 11)
6.7( 11)
0.0( 11)
2.0( 11)
24( 11)
113( 9)
49(10)
1537(11)
467 ( 11)
544 ( 9)
268( 9)
31.9(11)
1445( 11)
7.4( 11)
6.5( 3)
2.4( 3)
1.7( 11)
MIN.
40.6
6.7
0.7
20
83
31
1246
320
242
150
2.5
700
7.4
0.8
2.0
0.5
MAX.
40.6
6.7
3.0
26
160
74
1917
620
700
344
54.0
2300
7.6
12.3
2.8
3.2
UNIT
44.9
-2.2
6.6
-65.3
-76.4
11.1
-2.1
46.9
25.7
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
56.63 REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
76.1% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST AL
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
H
s
f
oo
oo
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS CL2
5/26/69 THROUGH 6/27/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
6/23/69 TO 6/27/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE
INFLUENT
80.6( 18)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.01 0)
0( 0)
36( 17)
0( 0)
1146(17)
310(17)
133(17)
76(14)
2.3( 17)
1465( 17)
7.7( 18)
1.8( 2)
1.6( 2)
0.0( 0)
5491(16)
2588( 16)
500. 0( 16)
EFFLUENT
80. 0( 18 )
7.6( 18)
0.0(16)
6.9( 17)
24(17)
126(18)
45( 18)
1352( 17)
394(17)
334( 17)
154(16)
5.8( 18)
916( 18)
7.8{ 18)
1.5( 3)
2.2( 3)
6.6( 17)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0.0( 0)
INFLUENT
81. 0(
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
0(
22(
0(
1122(
263(
34(
24(
1.5(
3675(
7.7(
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
11298(
5253(
955. 0(
2)
0)
0)
0)
0)
2)
0)
2)
2)
2)
1)
2)
2)
2)
0)
0)
0)
2)
2)
2)
EFFLUENT
80. 0(
7.7(
0.0(
7.3(
26(
81(
32(
1149(
286(
182(
114(
1.0(
667(
7.9(
0.0(
0.0(
7.K
01
0(
0.0(
3)
3)
2)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
2)
3)
3)
3)
0)
0)
3)
0)
0)
0)
EFFLUENT*
MIN.
80.0
7.7
7.1
22
34
27
1096
239
46
72
0.5
600
7.9
6.9
MAX.
2REDUCTI
UNI
80.0
7.7
7.5
29
144-278.
38
1252
327
-2.
-8.
264-436.
156-378.
1.5
700
8.0
7.7
81.
-3.
T
2
4
5
9
1
8
4
ON*
OVERALL
64.2
20
44
47
9
67
0
.3
.5
.7
.7
.6
.4
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O.(MG/L)
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
61.OX REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
-47.2% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
86.02? REMOVAL OF PF TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
w
00
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST AL
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS CL2
6/30/69 THROUGH 8/31/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
8/18/69 TO 8/31/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE
INFLUENT
40. 5 ( 14)
0.0( 0)
0.01 0)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
21(17)
0( 0)
945( 14)
285( 14)
141( 13)
89( 9)
0.3( 12)
591( 13)
7.7(13)
0.3( 3)
2.3( 3)
0.0( 0)
9475( 14)
4607( 14)
580.0(13)
EFFLUENT
40.0(14)
5.5( 14)
0.0( 0)
7.K 13)
25( 13)
31( 17)
16( 17)
1008( 14)
287( 14)
209( 13)
108( 12)
3.0( 12)
582( 13)
7.8( 13)
5.0( 3)
2.2( 2)
7.2( 13)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0.0( 0)
INFLUENT
40. 5 (
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
0(
9(
0(
813(
216(
93(
60 (
0.2(
265(
7.9(
O.K
1.9(
0.0(
7274(
2962(
612. 5(
2)
0)
0)
0)
0)
2)
0)
2)
2)
2)
1)
1)
2)
2)
1)
1)
0)
2)
2)
2)
EFFLUENT
40. 0(
5.5(
0.0(
7.4(
25(
23(
13(
930 (
26K
148(
100(
2.2(
427(
8.0(
0.0(
0.0(
7.4(
0(
0(
0.0(
3)
3)
0)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
3)
2)
3)
3)
0)
0)
3)
0)
0)
0)
EFFLUENT*
MIN.
40.0
5.5
6.4
22
18
10
887
218
108
60
1.5
280
7.9
6.5
MAX.
40.0
5.5
8.2
29
33-
15
1009
295
180
140
3.0
700
8.1
8.4
^REDUCTION*
UNIT OVERALL
170
-14
-20
-59
-68
-61
-1
.5
.3
.9
.1
.0
.0
.6
88
26
45
64
54
70
-2
.7
.0
.4
.3
.2
.9
.4
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O.(MG/L)
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
42.0% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
-56.8% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
93.4£ REMOVAL OF PF TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST AL
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
10
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
9/ 1/69 THROUGH 10/12/69
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 9/15/69 TO 10/ 3/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* %REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DFPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM )
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMPtDEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(MLXL)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE PJMG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
TNFLUFNT
0.01 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
5.5( 14)
35( 14)
198 ( 16)
0( 0)
1259( 16)
497( 16)
31K 16)
1621 12)
1.5( 16)
1258( 16)
8.K 16)
12. 5( 16)
2. 11 15)
EFFLUENT
32.01 16)
7.7( 16)
0.0( 0)
3.6( 15)
23( 15)
131( 16)
38( 16)
1626( 16)
6141 16)
732( 16)
456(12)
44.01 16)
1849( 16 )
7.5( 16)
0.9( 4)
1.8( 4)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
5.5( 11)
36< 11 )
222(12)
0( 0)
13571 12)
539( 12)
359( 12)
163( 11)
1.8( 12)
151K 12)
8.0( 12)
13. 5( 12)
1.7( 11)
EFFLUENT
32. 0( 12)
7.7(12)
0.0( 0)
3.1(11)
23( 11)
142( 12)
35(12)
1774(12)
683( 12)
898 (12)
507 ( 10)
55.1 (12)
2238( 12)
7.5(12)
l.K 3)
1.5( 3)
MIN.
32.0
7.7
2.0
21
36
16
1035
304
170
166
8.0
450
7.2
0.2
0.7
MAX.
32.0
7.7
4.5
25
302
91
3112
1300
2436-
UNIT OVERALL
35.9
-30.6
-26.7
150.4
1152-211.7
120.0
4770
7.8
2.6
2.3
/ y
-48.1
6.4
91.4
12.9
0.0. (MG/L )
0.0( 0)
3.6(15) 0.0( 0)
3.1 (11)
1.3
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
75.1% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
84. OX REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
w
vO
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST AL
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
11
INFLUENT SOURCE
TEST WAS FROM 10/13/69 THROUGH 12/19/69
FOR TEST WAS TF1
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT E.
66. 6(
24. 0(
0.0(
5.6(
29(
225(
0(
1869(
750(
497 (
24K
5.7(
1702(
7.4(
7.7(
2.2(
FFLU
ENT
27) 40.0(27)
27) 5.5(27)
27) 0.0(
0)
23) 6.4(24)
22)
15(24)
26) 134(27)
0)
43(25)
25) 1857(27)
25) 693(27)
24)
518(25)
19) 298(23)
26) 23.0(27)
25) 1234(27)
26)
7.3(
7) 4.7(
7)
2.2(
27)
7)
7)
EDITED
DATA AVE
RAGE
INFLUENT EFFLUEN
66. 6 (
24. 0(
0.0(
6.0(
27(
208(
0(
1772(
546(
314(
173(
3.8(
152K
7.3(
5.2(
2.K
7
7
7
6
6
7
0
7
7
7
5
7
7
7
2
2
) 40. 0(
) 5.5(
) 0.0(
) 6.5(
) 15(
) 89(
) 40 (
) 1650(
) 478 (
) 239(
) 152(
) 14. 2(
) 999 (
) 7.3(
) 5.9(
) 3.2(
« ttt
7
7
0
6
6
7
7
7
7
6
4
7
7
7
2
2
JL
T
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
t
EFFLUENT*
MIN.
40.0
5.5
6.1
12
40
28
1398
338
110
90
7.0
810
7.0
5.7
2.6
* i
MAX.
40.0
5.5
7.4
16
118
50
1865
585
320
260
20.0
1310
8.0
6.1
3.8
-» y
FROM 12/ 8/69 TO 12/19/69
^REDUCTION*
UNIT OVERALL
D.O.(MG/L)
SDLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) 0(
0( 0) 0( 0) 0( 0) 0(
188.6(26) 0.0( 0) 188.5( 7) 0.0(
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
54.9*, REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
80.7% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
85.8* REMOVAL OF PF TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
0)
0)
0)
57.3 68.5
6.8 10.5
12.5 29.0
24.0 29.5
12.2 21.5
34.3 37.5
-0.3 -0.9
-12.3 55.0
•48.8 27.6
*INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
TEST WAS FROM
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST AL
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
12
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS TF2
I/ 5/70 THROUGH 3/ 8/70 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
2/ 2/70 TO 2/20/70
I
VO
N3
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BODS (MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L)
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
INFLUENT
66.6(20)
24.0(20)
0.0(20)
7.2(15)
25(15)
389(20)
389(20)
2435(20)
1050(20)
616(20)
331(20)
1.7(20)
3643(20)
8.6(20)
24. 3( 6)
6.7( 6)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0.0( 0)
EFFLUENT
33.2(20)
5.0(20)
0.0( 0)
5.6( 15)
13(15)
124(20)
105(20)
2105( 18)
806(18)
451( 17)
294( 17)
2.0(20)
2803(20)
8.0(20)
7.4( 6)
4.6( 4)
6.5(14)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0.0( 0)
EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT*
INFL
66. 6 (
24. 0(
0.0(
8.4(
25(
46K
458(
2773(
12421
660(
369(
0.9(
4115(
8.8(
17. 8(
5.K
0.0(
0(
0(
0.0(
UENT
10)
10)
10)
9)
9)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
3)
3)
0)
0)
0)
0)
EFFLUENT
33. 2(
5.0(
0.0(
5.5(
IK
164(
146(
2372(
935(
48 3 (
3281
1.4(
3429(
8.3(
7.9(
3.7(
6.7(
0(
0(
0.0(
9)
9)
0)
8)
8)
9)
9)
8)
8)
7)
7)
9)
9)
9)
3)
2)
7)
0)
0)
0)
MIN.
33.3
5.0
1.3
8
61
52
2040
710
146
114
0.1
2695
7.9
0.0
3.0
2.2
MAX.
33.3
5.0
8.6
14
295
256
2750
1141
898
542
6.5
4310
8.8
12.3
4.4
9.6
5SREDUCTI
UNIT
64.2
68.0
14.4
24.7
26.8
11.1
16.6
5.9
55.5
27.9
OVE
70
20
31
36
24
31
8
56
30
ON*
iRALl
.9
.4
.7
.1
.0
.9
.7
.9
.0
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
11.0% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
68.2% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
74.1% REMOVAL OF PF TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
i
c-1
w
VO
OJ
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST AL 13
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
3/ 9/70 THROUGH 5/ 1/70
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 4/20/70 TO 5/ 1/70
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
OVERALL
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTHtFT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L )
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIOS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE PIMG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0(
0.0(
1.3(
32(
594(
0(
2599(
1216(
580(
34 1(
0.5(
4509(
9.2(
23. 9(
10. 2(
0)
0)
16)
16)
22)
0)
22)
22)
21)
21)
22)
22)
22)
18)
18)
EFFLUENT
16. 0(
7.7(
0.0(
0.8(
20 (
91(
87(
2204(
908(
388(
30 1(
0.7(
2895(
7.9(
25. 1(
7.K
22)
22)
0)
17)
17)
22)
21)
22)
22)
21)
17)
22)
22)
22)
4)
4)
INFLUENT
6.o( 61
0.0<
0.0(
0.2(
34(
625(
0<
2636(
1307(
469(
303 (
0.4(
4594(
9.0(
8.2(
7.9(
0)
0)
7)
7)
8)
0)
8)
8)
7)
7)
8)
8)
8)
4)
4)
EFFLUENT
16. 0(
7.7(
0.0(
0.3<
23(
116(
104(
2373(
102K
588(
41K
1.6(
3416(
7.8(
29. 8(
8.2(
8)
8)
0)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
8)
7)
6)
8)
8)
8)
1)
1)
MIN.
16.0
7.7
0.3
21
101
78
2204
889
360
232
0.0
2910
7.6
29.8
8.2
MAX.
TTTb
7.7
0.5
25
139
138
2582
1108
1096
668
5.5
4200
8.0
UNIT
81.4
9.9
21.8
-25.3
-35.2
25.6
13.6
29.8-260.1-
8.2
-2.8
D.O.(MG/L)
0.0( 0)
0.8(17)
0.0( 0)
0.4( 8)
0.4 0.5
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
10.6% REMOVAL OF MIXED EFFLUENT TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
83.3% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
*INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST OD
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
6/17/68 THROUGH 7/28/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
7/ 3/68 TO 7/28/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
0.0. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5IMG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MGXL)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDSIML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
2.91
37 (
204(
0(
10191
33K
235(
109(
0.5(
1265(.
7.6(
5.7(
0.8(
0)
0)
0)
8)
8)
15)
0)
13)
13)
14)
13)
10)
11)
12)
12)
12)
EFFLUENT
36. 2(
6.71
0.0(
0.0(
30 (
62(
0(
980(
310(
3581
158(
2.0(
1203(
7.5(
1.51
1.0(
15)
15)
15)
0)
10)
14)
0)
6)
6)
5)
5)
8)
13)
10)
9)
9)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
2.7(
37(
220(
0(
1072(
3631
239(
1101
0.81
1309(
7.6(
6.0(
0.8(
0)
0)
0)
5)
5)
10)
0)
9)
9)
10)
10)
6)
7)
10)
10)
10)
EFFLUENT
35. 8( 10)
6.7(10)
0.0( 10)
0.0( 0)
31( 5)
72( 9)
0( 0)
980( 6)
310( 6)
358( 5)
158( 5)
2.6( 4)
1239( 9)
7.4( 9)
1.5( 9)
1.0( 9)
MIN.
35.2
6.7
0.0
30
47
412
186
232
90
0.7
780
7.3
0.7
0.5
MAX.
36.5
6.7
0.0
32
92
1255
401
590
200
7.5
2485
7.7
2.1
1.7
UNIT OVERALL
67
8
14
-49
-43
5
2
74
-21
.0
.6
.4
.4
.8
.3
.3
.2
.6
D.O.(MG/L)
0.0( 0)
3.4(10)
0.0( 0)
3.3( 5)
2.4 5.2
M
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
*INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
B
f
w
VO
Ui
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST 00
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
TEST WAS FROM 7/29/68 THROUGH 9/ 8/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
8/21/68 TO 9/ 8/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L )
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
ill
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
3.1(12)
38( 12)
189(14)
0( 0)
1516(13)
584( 13)
388(13)
154(13)
2.7(13)
1876( 11)
8.2( 13)
6.9( 12)
2.4(12)
f*. r* i S\ 1
EFFLUENT
52. 5( 14)
7.0( 14)
0.0(14)
0.0( 0)
31(
97(
0(
1319(
467(
423(
216(
12. 8(
130K
7.5(
2.0(
2.6(
1 C 1
7)
11)
0)
11)
11)
11)
11)
11)
10)
11)
10)
10)
O I
EDITED DATA AVERAGE
INFLUENT
6. (VI or
0.0< 0)
0.0( 0)
2.6( 5)
38(
190(
0(
1418(
585(
390(
15K
6.2(
1667(
8.4(
2.7(
3.6(
n n I
5)
5)
0)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
n i
EFFLUENT
52. 1(
7.0(
0.0(
0.0(
31 (
81(
0(
1496 (
554(
534(
277(
17. 5(
1726(
7.6(
2.3(
4.1(
i «; t
4)
4)
4)
0)
1 )
4)
0)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
4)
A i
EFFLUENT*
MIN.
TJoTo
7.0
0.0
53
1290
495
352
210
10.0
1270
7.5
0.0
1.9
D-Q
MAX.
7.0
0.0
T 1
31
121
1615
643
760
370
25.0
2160
7.8
3.4
9f\
.0
?.0
^REDUCTION*
UNIT OVERALL
57.
-5.
5.
-37.
-83.
-3.
.
16.
1*5
2.
3
4
2
0
7
5
9
D.O. (MG/L)
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST OD
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
TEST WAS FROM 10/28/68 THROUGH 12/ 6/68 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
11/25/68 TO 12/ 6/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM )
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L)
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
4.9(
35(
233(
0(
1365(
524(
463(
190(
0
0
0
13
12
18
0
18
18
18
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1.3(16)
221K
8.K
10. 0(
1.9(
0.0(
16
17
18
18
0
)
)
)
)
)
109. 3(
7.0(
60. 0(
0.0(
23(
24(
31 (
2233(
878(
1269(
563{
80. 1(
3498(
7.3(
0.8(
1 .0 (
4.9(
17)
18)
17)
0)
15)
1)
17)
16)
16)
15)
14 )
12)
16)
16)
1)
1)
7)
INFLI
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
3.3(
35(
229(
0(
1090(
390(
353(
155(
0.6(
1788(
7.5(
6.K
1 . 8(
0.0(
LJENT EFFLUENT MIN.
0)
0)
0)
3)
3)
5)
0)
5)
5)
5)
5)
4)
4)
5)
5)
5)
0)
109. 3(
7.0(
60. 0(
0.0(
23(
0(
46 (
262K
98 0(
1645J
613(
47. 8(
4574(
7.3(
0.0(
0.0(
4.4(
6)
6)
6)
0)
5)
0)
6)
5)
5)
4)
4)
5)
5)
5)
0)
0)
4)
109.4
7.0
60.0
22
34
1560
541
710
136
0.2
1670
7.3
2.5
MAX.
109.4
7.0
60.0
24
54
5233
2022
4326
1672
126.0
9600
7.4
6.0
f1
M
VO
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
80.02 REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
W
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST CL2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
WAS FROM 10/28/68
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA NIMG/L)
PHOSPHATE PIMG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O.(MG/L)
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
INFLUENT SOURCE
8 THROUGH 12/ 6/68
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0.0( 0) 109.3(17)
0.0( 0) 0.0( 0)
0.0( 0) 0.01 0)
4.9(13) 0.0( 0)
35
233
0
1365
524
463
190
1.3
2211
8.1
10.0
1.9
0.0
0
0
0.0
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
<
(
(
(
(
12)
18)
0)
18)
18)
18)
18)
16)
16)
17)
18)
18)
0)
0)
0)
0)
0( 0)
31( 17)
0( 0)
10141 16)
3051 16)
123( 14)
711 10)
2.2( 16)
1089( 16)
7.41 16)
0.6( 17)
0.6( 17)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
136. 8( 8)
FOR TEST WAS PF TD OD
WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM 11/25/68 TO 1 2/ 6/68
EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
INFLUENT EFFLUENT MIM.
0.0( 0) 109. 3( 6) 109.4
0.0( 0) 0.0( 0)
0.0( 0) 0.0( 0)
3.3( 3) 0.0( 0
35(
229(
0(
1090(
390(
353(
155(
0.6(
17881
7.5(
6.K
1.8(
0.0(
0(
0(
0.0(
3)
5)
0)
5)
5)
5)
5)
4)
4)
5)
5)
5)
0)
0)
0)
0)
11
0( 0
46( 6
0( 0
28 ( 6
357( 6
1
0
25( 4
72( 4
,6( 5
763 < 6
7
0
0
0
192
,4( 6
81 t,
\ o
,7( 6
.0( 0
0( 0
0( 0
.5( 2
34
1
1023
298
88
34
0.1
600
7.4
0.0
1 0.5
) 0
) 0
) 55.0
MAX.
10974
54
1185
462
144
118
1.5
875
7.6
1.8
1.4
0
0
330.0
UNIT OVERALL
80
-3
8
64
53
57
1
85
59
.0
.4
.5
.6
.6
.3
.2
.9
.2
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
VINDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST OD
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
2/ 3/69 THROUGH 3/30/69
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 3/10/69 TO 3/30/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT'
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DFPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L )
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INF
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.1
31
249
0
1993
647
485
161
7.2
2040
7.5
7.0
2.8
LUENT
( Ol
( 0)
( 0)
(21)
(21)
(24)
( 0)
(23)
(23)
(23)
(23)
(23)
(23)
(18)
( 18)
(18)
EFFLUENT
61.0(16)
4.0(
70. 2(
0.9(
22(
0(
66 (
0(
0(
446 (
230(
3.6(
1740(
7.2(
0.0(
0.0(
16)
16)
14)
15)
0)
15)
0)
0)
15)
15)
15)
15)
15)
0 )
0)
INFL
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
5.8(
31 (
220(
0(
1883(
560(
514(
183(
8.3(
19931
7.6(
7.7(
3.3(
UENT EFFLUENT
0)
0)
0)
9)
9)
11)
0)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
7)
7)
7)
60. 8(
4.0(
71. 1(
1 .0 (
21(
0(
77 (
0(
0(
459(
237(
5.8(
1838(
7.2(
0.0(
0.0(
9
9
9
7
8
0
9
0
0
8
8
8
8
8
0
0
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
M I M .
4.0
60.0
0.3
19
50
226
152
0.2
850
6.9
MAX.
£775
4.0
80.0
4.8
24
89
1402
572
33.0
5200
7.6
D.O.(MG/L)
0.0( 0)
l.K 14)
0.0( 0)
1.2( 7)
0.4
4.8
g
t-1
M
VD
00
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
64.7% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
SINDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
w
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST CL2
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF TO OD
2/ 3/69 THROUGH 3/30/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
3/10/69 TO 3/30/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
OVERALL
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM )
D.O. (MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
6.K
31(
2491
0(
1993(
647 (
485(
16K
7.2(
2040 (
7.5(
7.0(
2.8(
OT
0)
0)
21)
21)
24)
0)
23)
23)
23)
23)
23)
23)
18)
18)
18)
EFFLUENT
62. 5(
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
0(
661
0(
1497(
463(
284(
158(
0.5(
1488(
7.2(
3.2(
1.3(
16)
0)
0)
0)
0)
15)
0)
16)
16)
16)
16)
16)
16)
14)
3)
3)
INFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
5.8(
31(
220(
0(
1883(
560(
514(
183(
8.3(
1993(
7.6(
7.7(
3.3(
0}
0)
0)
9)
9)
11)
0)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
10)
7)
7)
7)
EFFLUENT
62. 5(
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
0(
77 (
0(
1455(
422 (
262(
157(
0.5(
1356(
7.2(
1.9C
l.K
9J
0)
0)
0)
0)
9)
0)
9)
9)
9)
9)
9)
9)
7)
1)
1)
MIN.
6775
50
1259
359
110
64
0.0
1000
6.9
1.9
1.1
MAX.
89
1601
484
398
300
1.5
1750
7.5
1.9
1.1
UNIT
64.7
22.7
24.5
48.9
14.1
31.9
5.0
75.4
67.6
D.O.(MG/L)
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE{ML/L)
0.0( 0) 0.0( 0) 0.0( 0) 0.0( 0)
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
0)
1285111)
532( 11 )
23.7(14)
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
0)
0)
176K
717(
21.4(
6)
6)
7)
358 4344
244 1604
5.0 30.0
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
VINDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST OD
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
3/31/69 THROUGH 5/18/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
4/28/69 TO 5/18/69
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O.(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT*
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
5.9(
32(
22K
0(
15431
543(
3611
206(
0.8(
1576(
7.6(
10. 6(
3. 1 (
0)
0)
0)
18)
18 )
21)
0)
21)
21)
20)
20)
21)
21)
20)
20)
20)
31. 1(
4.01
40. 0(
1.7(
22(
0(
43 (
0(
0(
4674(
1766(
277. 7(
109631
7.3(
0.0(
0.0(
21 )
21)
21)
19)
19)
0)
19)
0)
0)
19)
19)
20)
20)
20)
0)
0)
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.01
6.0(
32(
209(
0(
1497(
494(
284(
129(
0.9(
1509(
7.3(
13. 0(
3.5(
0
0
0
11
11
11
0
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
31. 11
4.01
40. 0(
0.91
241
01
391
01
0(
77111
2848(
516.51
193001
7.3(
0.0(
0.0(
: 10
[10
10
I 10
: 10
: o
:io
: o
0
;io
10
10
10
10
0
0
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
>
)
)
)
MIN.
31.2
4.0
40.0
0.6
21
23
1836
790
75.0
5000
7.2
MAX.
"3772
4.0
40.0
2.0
27
72
17476
6176
975.0
32767
7.6
0.0( 0)
1.9(18)
0.0( 0)
1.2( 10)
0.6
2.5
o
o
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
81.4% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
'INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
t-1
w
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST CL2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF TO OD
3/31/69 THROUGH 5/18/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
4/28/69 TO 5/18/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLEtGPM )
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST 00
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
5/19/69 THROUGH 6/27/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
6/ 9/69 TO 6/27/69
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTHfFT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
0.0.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
B005(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L}
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
0.0.(MG/L)
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT*
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.01
4.9(
36(
192(
01
150K
530(
399(
165(
2.3(
1716(
7.4(
10. 4<
3.3(
0)
0)
0)
18)
18)
21)
0)
21)
21)
21)
21)
22)
22)
17)
17)
17)
80.3
5.1
40.0
1.4
I
(
(
(
3G(
0
36
0
0
2551
1218
241.3
5497
7.6
0.0
0.0
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
18
18
18
17
17
0
)
)
)
)
)
}
17)
0
0
18
18
18
18
18
0
0
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0.0( 0
0.0( 0
0.0{ 0
5.4( 9
37 ( 9
215(11
0( 0
1475( 11
526(11
409( 11
169(11]
3.4( 11
1809(111
7.8( 8
13. 2( 8
3.7( 8]
f 79
1 5
1 40
1
1
28
.8(
.!(
,0(
.3(
30 (
0(
29(
0(
0(
57(
1395(
320
.2(
63561
7
1 0
0
.7(
.0(
• 0(
9)
9 )
9)
9)
9)
0)
8)
0)
0)
9)
9)
9)
9)
9)
0)
0)
MIN.
TTTo
5.2
40.0
0.5
28
21
878
408
80.0
2300
7.5
MAX.
"sTTo
5.2
40.0
3.1
33
60
7872
3723
840.0
16400
8.1
0.0( 0)
17)
0.0( 0
1.5( 9)
0.7
3.5
w
o
N3
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
86.6% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
-^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
I
w
o
w
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST CL2
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF TO 00
5/19/69 THROUGH 6/27/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
6/ 9/69 TO 6/27/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
OVERALL
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA NIMG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L)
SOLIDS(MG/L )
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0(
4.9(
36(
192(
0(
150K
530(
399 (
165(
2.3(
1716(
7.4(
10. 4(
3.3(
0.0(
0(
0(
0.0(
0)
IB)
IB)
21)
0)
21)
21)
21)
21)
22)
22)
17)
17)
17)
0)
0)
0)
0)
EFFLUENT
80. 6 (
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
0(
36(
0(
1146(
310(
133(
76(
2.3(
1465(
7.7(
1. 8 (
1.6(
0.0(
549K
2588(
500. 0(
18)
0)
0)
0)
0)
17)
0)
17)
17)
17)
14 )
17)
17)
18)
2)
2)
0)
16)
16)
16)
INFLUENT
6.6( 6}
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
5.4( 9)
37( 9)
215(11)
0( 0)
1475( 11)
526(11)
409( 11)
169(11)
3.4( 11)
1809( 11)
7.8( 8)
13. 2( 8)
3.7( 8)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0.0( 0)
EFFL
66.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0
29
0
1077
284
69
41
0.5
1313
7.8
2.4
2.6
0.0
7069
3365
816.2
UENT
( 9)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 0)
( 8)
( 0)
( 8)
( 8)
( 8)
( 6)
( 8)
( 8)
( 9)
( 1)
( 1)
( 0)
( 8)
( 8)
( 8)
MIN.
SO
21
°30
179
32
20
0.0
300
7.6
2.4
2.6
2962
1548
420.0
MAX.
ITTTo1
60
1213
369
136
92
1.5
6500
8.1
2.4
2.6
12836
5735
980.0
UNI
«•••
86.
26.
45.
83.
75.
27.
0.
81.
30.
T
»
6
9
9
2
8
4
1
8
2
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST OD
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF
6/30/69 THROUGH 8/31/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
7/28/69 TO 8/31/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM )
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
2.9(
37(
207 (
0(
13001
488 (
354(
166(
2.9(
1566(
7.8(
11. 0(
3.3(
0)
0)
0)
16)
16)
20)
0)
19)
19)
19)
19)
16)
18)
17)
18)
16)
40. 5 (
5.K
40. 0(
2.6(
29(
0(
21 (
0(
0(
3220(
1415(
221.31
6514(
7.6(
3.9(
1.6(
14 )
14)
14)
13)
13)
0)
17)
0)
0)
14)
14)
12)
13)
14)
1)
1)
INFL
0.01
0.01
0.0(
2.2(
36(
199(
0(
127K
499(
365(
180(
2.0(
1583(
7.9{
9.0(
2.71
UENT EFFLUENT
0)
0)
0)
13)
13)
15)
0)
15)
15)
15)
15)
13)
15)
15)
15)
14)
40.5
5.1
40.0
2.5
29
0
12
0
0
3688
1555
230.0
6036
7.6
0.0
0.0
(
(
(
{
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
I
(
6)
6)
6)
5)
5)
0)
5)
0)
0)
5)
5)
4)
5)
5)
0)
0)
MIN.
40.5
5.2
40.0
0.6
27
6
954
536
70.0
2300
7.6
MAX.
4075
5.2
40.0
4.2
29
26
990v
3983
590.0
10800
7.8
D.O. (MG/L )
0.0( 0)
2.6(13)
0.0( 0)
2.5( 5)
0.6
4.3
r1
w
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
93.7% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
I
w
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST CL2
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS PF TO OD
6/30/69 THROUGH 8/31/69 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
7/28/69 TO 8/31/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
OEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMPtDEG C)
BOD5(MG/L )
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
00
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE
9/ 1/69 THROUGH 10/12/69
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH EDITED AVERAGE
FROM 9/22/69 TO 10/12/69
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT'
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L )
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDSIMG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
5.5( 14)
35( 14)
198(16}
0( 0)
1259(16)
497( 16)
31K 16)
162( 12)
1.5( 16)
1258(16)
8.1(16)
12. 5( 16)
2.1(15)
66.6(16)
8.5( 16)
30.0(16)
1.3( 15)
27(15)
30(13)
26( 16)
0( 0)
0( 0)
3028( 16)
1604(16)
308. 0( 15)
6514(16)
7.4( 16)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
INFLUENT EFFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
5.9( 10)
35(10)
185(12)
0( 0)
1223( 12)
480(12)
28K 12)
155( 8)
1.8( 12)
1079(12)
8.K 12)
11.8(12)
2.4( 12)
66. 6( 10)
8.5(10)
30.0(10)
1.6( 9)
27( 9)
25( 7)
19(10)
0( 0)
0( 0)
3545(10)
1873( 10)
362.5(10)
7512( 10)
7.3(10)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
MIM.
66.7
8.5
30.0
0.5
23
12
14
1308
918
100.0
620
7.1
MAX.
66.7
8.5
30.0
3.5
29
50
28
11498
5694
900.0
26000
7.6
D.D.(MG/L)
0.0( 0)
1.4(15)
0.0( 0)
1.6( 9)
0.6
3.6
M
M
o
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
89.8% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
*INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
i
w
o
•vj
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST CL2
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM 9/
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MGXL)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O.(MG/L)
SOLIDS(MGXL)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(MLXL)
INFLUENT SOURCE
9 THROUGH
10/12/69
AVERAGE OF ALL
INFLUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
5.5(14)
35( 14)
198(16)
0( 0)
1259(16)
497(16)
31K 16)
162(12)
1.5(16)
1258(16)
8.1(16)
12.5(16)
2.1(15)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
0( 0)
0.0( 0)
66. 6(
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
0(
26(
0(
101K
322(
137(
107(
0.6(
464(
7.5(
1. 7(
0.7(
0.0(
7897 (
4019(
785. 3(
DATA
6 IT
16)
0)
0)
0)
0)
16)
0)
16)
16)
16)
6)
16)
16)
16)
4)
4)
0)
13)
13)
13)
FOR TEST WAS PF
WITH
TO
EDITED AVERAGE
EDITED DATA AVERAGE
IS
=LUENT
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
5.9( 10)
35(10)
EFFLU
66 . 6 (
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
0(
185(12) 19(
0( 0)
122
3( 12)
480(12)
28
1( 12)
155( 8)
1.
8( 12)
1079( 12)
8.
1(12)
11.8(12)
2.4( 12)
0.
0( 0)
0( 0)
0.
0( 0)
0( 0)
0(
95K
304 (
92(
80(
0.2(
332(
7.4(
0.5(
0.9(
0.0(
9754(
4955(
952. 2(
ENT
lo\
0)
0)
0)
0)
10)
0)
10)
10)
10)
3)
10)
10)
10)
3)
3)
0)
9)
9)
9)
OD
FROM
9/22/69
EFFLUENT*
MIN.
14
830
208
50
56
0.1
180
7.4
0.0
0.8
6622
3370
930.0
MAX.
6677
28
1084
487
142
98
0.5
510
7.6
0.8
1.1
14546
7197
990.0
TO
1
0/12/69
^REDUCTION*
UNI
89.
22.
36.
67.
48.
69.
8.
95.
60.
T
•
8
2
7
0
3
2
6
5
4
OVERALL
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST OD
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS TF2
I/ 5/70 THROUGH 3/ 8/70 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
2/18/70 TO 3/ 8/70
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
UNIT OVERALL
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM)
D.O.(MG/L)
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5IMG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDSIMG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA NIMG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
I NFL
66.61
24.01
0.01
7.21
251
3891
3891
24351
10501
6161
33H
1.71
36431
8.61
24.3i
6.7l
.UENT
20)
!20)
120)
:i5)
:is)
[20)
120)
120)
120)
120)
(20)
120)
(20)
(20)
( 6)
( 6)
EFFLU
33.2
4.2
30.0
7.3
14
0
82
0
0
1160
670
29.0
3837
7.8
0.0
0.0
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
ENT
20 i
20)
20)
14)
15)
0)
18)
0)
0)
14)
14)
17)
17)
18)
0)
0)
INFLUENT
66. 6(
24. 0(
0.0(
7.8(
25(
593(
5591
32061
1605(
841 (
490(
3.0(
5467(
8.9(
15.41
6.2(
TT
6)
6)
5)
5)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
2)
2)
EFFLUENT
33. 2(
4.3(
30. 0(
4.81
16(
0(
88(
0(
0(
106K
648 (
28. 2(
3654(
7.8(
0.0(
0.0(
M
5)
5)
4)
4)
0)
5)
0)
0)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
0)
0)
MIM.
"3*3"^
4.3
30.0
4.1
14
31
476
334
3.0
2900
7.4
MAX.
33.3
4.3
30.0
5.9
17
139
1836
1130
55.0
4900
8.3
D.O. (MG/L)
0.0( 0)
7.5(14)
0.0( 0)
5.1( 4)
4.4 5.9
84.2
f
W
o
oo
OTHER BOD EFFICIENCIES FROM EDITED DATA AS FOLLOWS
85.1% REMOVAL OF MIXED FEED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^-INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
&
f
PI
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST CL2
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
10
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS TF2 TO 00
I/ 5/70 THROUGH 3/ 8/70 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
2/18/70 TO 3/ 8/70
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE(GPM )
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
B005(MG/L)
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L)
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT CONTENTS
D.O. (MG/L )
INFLUENT
66. 6( 20)
24.0(20)
0.0( 20)
7.2( 15)
25(15)
389(20)
389(20)
2435(20)
1050(20)
616(20)
331(20)
1.7(20)
3643( 20)
8.6(20)
24. 3( 6)
6.7( 6)
0.0( 0)
EFFLUENT
33. 2(
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
0(
82(
0(
1984(
713(
443 (
250(
1.4(
2608(
7.7(
3.8(
6.0(
0.0(
20T
0)
0)
0)
0)
18)
0)
18)
18)
18)
18)
18)
18)
18)
4)
3)
0)
INFLUENT
66. 6 (
24. 0(
0.0(
7.8(
25(
593(
559(
3206(
1605(
84K
490(
3.0(
5467 (
8.9(
15. 4(
6.2(
0.0(
6
6
6
5
5
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
6)
2)
2)
0)
EFFLUENT
33. 2(
0.0(
0.0(
0.0(
0(
88(
0(
2029(
766 (
614(
255(
O.K
2713(
7.7(
2.8(
5.8(
0.0(
5)
0)
0)
0)
0)
5)
0)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
5)
2)
2)
0)
MIN.
T57-5
31
1429
412
230
146
0.0
1450
7.5
0.8
5.5
MAX.
T?7*
139
2571
1063
1678
338
0.2
4900
8.1
4.9
6.2
UNIT
85.1
36.7
52.2
27.0
47.8
50.3
13.2
81.5
6.4
OVERALL
85.6
34.7
50.1
30.0
48.1
49.0
15.5
R5.0
19.7
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED 0( 0) 933( 3) 0( 0) 933( 3) 746 1044
VOLATILE SUSP. 0( 0) 537( 3) 0( 0) 537( 3) 444 600
SLUDGE(ML/L) 0.0( 0) 20.0( 3) 0.0( 0) 20.0( 3) 10.0 30.0
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
H
I
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST OD
(MFAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
10
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS TF1
3/ 9/70 THROUGH 5/ 1/70 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
4/20/70 TO 5/ 1/70
AVERAGF OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT'
PARAMETER
FEFD(GPM)
DFPTH(FT )
RECYCLE (GPM
D.O. (MG/L )
TEMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L )
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDS(MG/L
TOTAL
TOTAL VOL
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE
SETT. SOLIDS
INFLUENT
)
)
ATILE
SUSP.
(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P
UNIT CONTENT
D.O. (MG/L )
SOLIDSIMG/L
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE
SLUDGE(ML/L
(MG/L)
S
)
SUSP.
)
OTHER BOD EFFICIENC
33. 2(
24. 0(
33. 2(
0.01
28 (
2721
01
2390!
1022(
5221
3411
2.3!
3682!
8.21
9.11
5.4i
0.7-
7567
1523i
30.2
22)
22)
22)
; o )
16)
:2o>
[ 0)
122)
: 22)
: 21)
I 20)
122)
122)
122)
[ 5)
( 5)
1 16)
( 18)
(15)
( 18)
IES FROM EDI
EFFLUENT
33o2( 22)
4.2( 22)
30. 0( 22)
5.6( 16)
20( 16)
0( 0)
86( 20 )
0( 0)
0( 0)
1671(22)
10251 20)
58.5(22)
5270( 22)
7.8(22)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
5.7( 16)
0(0)
0( 0)
0.0( 0)
TED DATA
INFLUENT
33. 2(
24. 0(
33. 2(
0.0(
31 (
266(
0(
241 8 (
1093(
475(
344(
2.7(
3588(
8.0(
2.K
3.9(
0.8(
24181
1425(
18. 7(
AS FOL
8)
8)
8)
0)
7)
8)
0)
8)
8)
8)
7)
8)
8)
8)
1)
1)
7)
8)
7)
8)
LOWS
EFFLUENT
33. 2(
4.3(
30. 0(
4.4(
22(
0(
65(
0(
0(
2182(
1466 (
75. 6(
9810(
7.6(
0.0(
0.0(
4.5(
0(
0(
0.0(
5
5
5
4
4
0
5
0
0
5
4
5
5
5
0
0
4
0
0
0
}
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
M I N .
1375
4.3
30.0
3.8
21
45
248
799
5.0
3400
7.3
3.9
MAX.
33 . 3
4.3
30.0
5.3
23
91
4440
2336
150.0
18200
7.9
5.4
15.5% REMOVAL OF MIXED FFED TO SETTLED EFFLUENT
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
w
SUMMARY OF PILOT TREATMENT UNIT RESULTS FOR TEST CL2 11
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TEST WAS FROM
INFLUENT SOURCE FOR TEST WAS TF1 TO OD
3/ 9/70 THROUGH 5/ 1/70 WITH EDITED AVERAGE FROM
4/20/70 TO 5/ 1/70
AVERAGE OF ALL DATA EDITED DATA AVERAGE EFFLUENT* ^REDUCTION*
PARAMETER
FEED(GPM)
DEPTH(FT)
RECYCLE (GPM)
0.0. (MG/L )
TFMP(DEG C)
BOD5(MG/L )
MIXED
SETTLED
SOLIDSIMG/L )
TOTAL
TOTAL VOLATILE
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SETT.SOLIDS(ML/L)
APPARENT COLOR
PH
AMMONIA N(MG/L)
PHOSPHATE P(MG/L)
UNIT mNTFNTS
INFLUENT
33.2(22)
24.0(22)
33.2(22)
0.0( 0)
28(16)
272(20)
0( 0)
2390(22)
1022(22)
522(21)
341(20)
2.3(22)
3682(22)
8.2(22)
9.K 5)
5.4( 5)
EFFLUENT
33.2(22)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0.0( 0)
0( 0)
86(20)
0( 0)
2026( 19)
781(19)
41K 19)
211( 16)
1.3( 20)
3159(20)
7.7(20)
3.0( 3)
6.7( 3)
0.0.(MG/L)
SOLIDS(MG/L)
SUSPENDED
VOLATILE SUSP.
SLUDGE(ML/L)
0.7(16)
7567(18)
1523(15)
30.2(18)
0.0( 0)
2163(18)
1173(18)
72.3(17)
INFLUEI
33. 2( 8
24. 0( 8
33. 2( 8
0.0( 0
31( 7
266( 8
0( 0
2418( 8
1093( 8
475( 8
344 ( 7
2.7( 8
3588( 8
8.0( 8
2 . ? ( 1
3.9( 1
YT EFFLUEN
\ 33. 2(
) 0.0(
) 0.0(
) 0.0(
) 0(
) 65(
) 0(
) 20241
) 814(
294(
185(
0.8(
3744 (
7.5(
1.0{
6.1(
5
0
0
0
0
5
0
4
r
\
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
4)
4
4
5
5
5
1
1
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
0.8( 7)
2418(
1425(
18.7(
8)
7)
8)
0.0( 0)
35401
192K
126.0(
5)
5)
5)
MIN. MAX.
"3TT3 55. 3
UNIT OVERALL
45 91 75.5 89.5
16.3 23.2
25.5 37.6
38.0 37.3
46.1 38.9
-4.3 18.4
5.8 16.1
52.3 87.9
•56.4 23.5
1842
690
224
161
0.0
3400
7.5
1.0
6.1
2188
921
364
244
3.0
4600
7.7
1.0
6.1
912 6080
580 3200
30.0 300.0
( ) DESIGNATES NUMBER OF VALUES IN AVERAGE
^INDICATES EDITED DATA
-------
SHEET 1
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 172 IN FILE RECORD 1 DATA FOR 6/21/68
PF TF1 TF2 AL OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM 22.5 26.0 41.0 36.0
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0 6.7 6.7
RECY-GPM 23.0 24.0 0.0 0.0
0.0.
TEMP - C 26.0 29.0
BOD5 200.0 168.0 32.0 62.0
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
00-CONT. 5.8 4.4
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 177 IN FILE RECORD 2 DATA FOR 6/26/68
PF TF1 TF2 AL OD CL2
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
6005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
161
753
77
272
201
0
1690
.0
.9
.9
.2
.8
.3
.0
22
24
23
66
1
1095
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.4
22.0
24.0
23.0
131.0
0.9
855.0
41.
6.
0.
28.
51.
1140.
2.
0
7
0
0
0
0
7
38
6
0
30
73
1
1320
1
.0
.7
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.3
SLUDGE-SETT
WJ
B
w
H
DAY 179 IN FILE RECORD i DATA FOR 6/28/68
PF TF1 TF2 AL 00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM 22.0 22.5 40.5 39.0
D6PTH-FT 24.0 24.0 6.7 6.7
RECY-GPM 23.0 20.0 0.0 0.0
D.O. 3.4 3.6 3.2
TEMP - C 32.0 32.0 32.0 23.0 26.0
BODS 172.0 58.0 75.0 16.0 26.0
TS 899.9
VTS 341.8
SS 171.8
VSS
SETT SOL 0.1 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.1
COLOR 1080.0 630.0 765.0 486.0 765.0
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT. 0.5 2.9 4.7
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 184 IN FILE RECORD 4 DATA FOR II 3/68
PF TF1 TF2 AL OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM 23.5 22.0 43.5 36.5
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0 6.7 6.7
RECY-GPM 25.0 25.0 0.0 0.0
D.O. 0.2 5.3 2.5
TEMP - C 32.0 28.0 26.0 27.0 29.0
BOD5 187.0 52.0 68.0 29.0 21.0
TS 1210.0
VTS 310.9
SS 314.0
VSS 280.1
SETT SOL 0.0 1.3 0.2 1.0
COLOR 1925.0 850.0 1375.0 2250.0 1500.0
PH 8.7 7.2 7.3 7.3
NITROGEN 10.3 3.4 0.6 3.4
PHOSPHOR 0.2 0.8 1.4 1.2
00-CONT. 0.3 2.4 4.7
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
SLUOGE-SETT
-------
SHEET 2
p]
H
N3
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FHOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
191 IN
PF
3.0
34.0
228.0
980.9
306.9
166.0
97.9
0.6
1200.0
7.3
0.8
1.2
FILE
TF1
22.0
24.0
23.0
1.5
30.0
87.0
0.1
800.0
7.5
1.2
1.0
3.0
RECORD
TF2
21.5
24.0
21.0
3.7
31.0
54.0
1.1
725.0
7.4
0.8
1.2
5 DATA
AL
DELETE
41.0
6.7
0.0
28.0
174.0
1650.0
7.7
1.6
3.2
4.3
FDR 7/10/68
00 CL2
36.5
6.7
0.0
30.0
92.0
1.2
1650.0
7.6
1.3
0.9
5.2
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
193 IN
PF
DELETE
4.0
37.0
139.0
839.9
208.8
195.9
83.9
0.1
875.0
7.3
2.4
1.2
FILE
TF1
RECORD
TF2
DELETE DELETE
22.0
24.0
22.0
6.2
32.0
48.0
0.5
755.0
7.2
0.4
0.6
2. 1
20.0
24.0
22.0
6.0
33.0
73.0
0.1
875.0
7.2
1.7
0.5
7 DATA
AL
DELETE
42.0
6.7
0.0
3.6
28.0
33.0
775.0
7.4
0.4
0.8
3.4
FOR 7/12/68
00 CL2
DELETE DELETE
35.2
6.7
0.0
30.0
34.0
2.6
900.0
7.7
3.2
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
192 IN
PF
222
1154
460
108
65
0
1275
7
0
1
.0
.9
.9
.0
.9
.1
.0
.3
.1
.7
FILE RECORD
TFl TF2
DELETE
22.0 24.0
24.0 24.0
23.0 26.5
73.
4.
1300.
7.
0.
1.
0
7
0
6
0
0
171.
0.
1705.
7.
0.
1.
0
8
0
5
9
3
6 DATA
AL
42.0
6.7
0.0
135.
6.
1350.
7.
0.
2.
0
9
0
8
4
0
FOR
OD
36.
6.
0.
53.
1075.
7.
1.
1.
5
7
0
0
0
7
0
7
7/11/68
CL2
DELETE
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
196
IN
PF
FILE
TFl
RECORD
8 DATA
TF2
AL
FOR
00
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
3
38
223
963
319
204
78
0
7
5
1
.9
.5
.0
.0
.7
.1
.1
.1
.2
.9
.2
23.
24.
23.
33.
61.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0
0
0
0
0
1
7
5
7
22.
24.
25.
6.
34.
85.
0.
2.
0.
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
4
42.
6.
0.
4.
28.
68.
14.
0.
0.
4.
0
7
0
3
0
0
0
5
9
0
35.
6.
0.
31.
70.
0.
780.
7.
1.
0.
3.
2
7
0
0
0
7
0
7
7
9
0
7/15/68
CL2
DELETE
22.2
910.9
232.9
187.9
79.9
0.1
SLUDGE-SETT
-------
SHEET 3
LISTING OF
INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAO-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
VjJ
CO
«
w
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
198 IN
PF
DELETE
3.0
40.0
223.0
914. 9
289.8
162.0
30.9
1700.0
7.1
8.6
0.7
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
34.0
81.0
1.3
1475.0
7.0
2.7
0.2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
23.0
6.2
36.0
75.0
0.1
860.0
6.9
5.2
0.4
61.0
9 DATA
AL
DELETE
42.0
6.7
0.0
31.0
46.0
1760.0
7.3
1.0
0.3
2.2
FOR 7/17/68
OD CL2
DELETE
35.2
6.7
0.0
32.0
88.0
1066.8
319.9
2485.0
7.3
1.9
1.0
2.4
DELETE
22.0
61.0
814.0
232.9
89.8
56.9
0.1
7.3
1.8
0.4
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
200 IN
PF
DELETE
259.0
1194.9
453.9
242.0
68.0
3.5
1200.0
7.5
5.5
1.3
FILE RECORD
TF1
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
82.0
1085.9
395.9
242.0
70.1
1010.0
7.3
2.0
1.0
TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
148.0
1183.9
413.8
314.0
106.1
875.0
7.2
0.8
1.1
87.0
11 DATA
AL
DELETE
40.6
6.7
0.0
30.5
61.0
945.8
344.9
216.0
133.9
550.0
7.4
0.9
1.1
3.0
FOR 7/19/68
00
DELETE
35.2
6.7
0.0
30.5
81.0
1071.0
346.9
231.9
89.7
900.0
7.3
1.7
1.4
2.4
CL2
DELETE
22.2
87.0
937.0
318.9
90.0
450.0
7.2
2.5
0.9
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 199 IN
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
PF
DELETE
2.3
40.5
194.0
1107.0
403.8
254.2
26.2
0.1
1100.0
7.4
5.8
1.1
FILE RECORD
TF1
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
35.0
25.0
813.9
229.9
181.8
95.8
0.1
7.3
4.3
0.5
0.5
TF2
10 DATA FOR
AL
OD
DELETE
23.0
24.0
24.0
6.1
36.0
56.0
830.9
243.9
151.9
65.9
1.4
355.0
7.3
3.0
0.9
36.0
42.0
6.7
0.0
31.0
125.0
1302.9
360.9
440.0
183.9
1550.0
7.3
1.9
1.4
1.9
35.2
6.7
0.0
7/18/68
CL2
DELETE
22.2
35.0
36.0
726.0
169.9
83.9
46.0
0.1
265.0
7.2
3.0
0.6
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
203 IN
PF
DELETE
211.0
FILE RECORD
TF1
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
36.0
TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
24.5
77.0
1153.1 1006.0 1067.9
392.9
256.0
162.0
0.0
725.0
8.7
7.8
0.9
317.8
184.0
132.1
0.3
890.0
7.5
4.4
0.5
315.9
248.1
173.9
0.3
740.0
7.4
3.9
0.4
74.0
12 DATA
AL
41.0
6.7
0.0
73.0
1069.0
297.9
199.8
137.9
2.0
810.0
7.3
2.0
0.8
FOR 7/22/68
00
36.5
6.7
0,0
47.0
1020.0
298.8
260.0
169.9
1.0
925.0
7.5
2.1
1.2
CL2
DELETE
22.2
74.0
995.0
279.0
184.0
126.0
750.0
7.4
1.7
0.2
SLUDGE-SETT
-------
en
E3
w
J>
SHEET 4
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
IMEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY
205
PF
IN
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
13 DATA
AL
FOR
00
7/24/68
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
3.
38.
184.
1009.
362.
234.
91.
0.
1140.
7.
5.
0.
6
0
0
9
9
0
8
5
0
U
0
3
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
207
PF
IN
22.2
24.0
22.2
0.3
33.0
38.0
208.1
92.1
0.1
960.0
7.3
1.3
0.2
0.3
920.0
FILE
TF1
23
24
26
35
32
1103
360
262
120
0
790
7
1
0
51
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.1
.2
.1
.0
.2
.4
.5
.0
RECORD
TF2
42
6
35
912
248
95
49
550
7
1
0
.0
.7
.0
.9
.9
.8
.7
.0
.4
.1
.8
15 DATA
AL
36.
6.
0.
31.
73.
1054.
309.
287.
148.
7.
990.
7.
0.
0.
3.
FOR
5
7
0
0
0
0
9
7
0
5
0
3
7
9
5
DELETE
22
51
875
271
92
46
550
7
3
0
.2
.0
.0
.9
.0
.9
.0
.2
.4
.3
7/26/68
OD
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
223.
1069.
367.
238.
95.
8.
14.
0.
0
9
9
0
8
4
6
4
SLUDGE-SETT
22.2
24.0
22.2
60.0
1000.9
287.8
244.1
106.2
2.7
650.0
7.5
1.7
0.6
660.0
22
24
30
86
1013
304
261
127
400
7
0
0
175
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.8
.0
.2
.8
.7
.0
40
6
0
60
1076
325
274
115
550
7
3
0
.6
.7
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.9
.0
.5
.6
.6
35.
6.
0.
82.
411.
186.
419.
184.
1150.
7.
1.
0.
2
7
0
0
9
1
9
0
0
4
7
7
CL2
DELETE
30
175
934
281
111
43
550
7
1
0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.9
.0
.3
.9
.3
DAY 206 IN FILE RECORD 14 DATA FOR 7/25/68
PF
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
00-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
237
469
129
7
2
0
.0
.9
.9
.1
.2
.5
TF1
TF2
AL
OD
DELETE DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
51.0
1212.0
356.8
422.0
100.0
1050.0
7.3
1.4
0.2
22.
24.
22.
135.
1174.
413.
400.
97.
810.
7.
1.
0.
101.
2
0
2
0
9
9
0
9
0
4
2
3
0
40.
6.
0.
33.
991.
288.
263.
650.
7.
1.
0.
6
7
0
0
9
9
9
0
9
1
4
36
6
0
66
1255
400
589
199
1200
7
2
0
.5
.7
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.8
.0
.6
.0
.5
CL2
DELETE
22
101
1054
314
193
775
7
1
0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.1
.1
.2
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
217
IN
PF
FILE
TF1
RECORD
16 DATA
TF2
AL
FOR
8/ 5/68
OD
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5
39
196
1475
486
381
109
0
7
31
0
.0
.5
.0
.9
.9
.0
.9
.5
.9
.8
.6
SLUDGE-SETT
33.3
24.0
33.3
0.1
32.0
126.0
1345.0
467.0
417.9
173.9
1.7
7.6
23.1
0.8
0.1
200.0
22.
24.
0.
34.
187.
1806.
657.
877.
324.
11.
7.
23.
2.
2
0
0
0
0
9
9
0
0
0
7
0
9
60.
6.
0.
32.
85.
1240.
446.
413.
185.
7.
4.
0.
1.
8
7
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
3
2
7
2
CL2
DELETE
52
7
0
32
133
1203
369
476
211
10
7
3
1
0
.9
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.0
.3
.2
.2
.7
22
1326
469
411
160
0
7
25
0
.9
.9
.8
.9
.9
.5
.5
.6
.7
-------
SHEET 5
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
3
DAY
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
00-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
219 IN
PF
DELETE
3.9
36.0
113.0
950.0
250.9
231.9
115.9
2.0
7.3
5.9
4.7
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
221 IN
PF
DELETE
203.0
2653.9
1066.8
404.0
133.9
0.3
1990.0
9.1
SLUDGE-SETT
FILE RECORD
TF1
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
0.2
34.0
32.0
910.9
229.9
173.9
129.9
3.0
7.3
4.9
1.4
0.2
60.0
TF2
DELETE
24.0
24.0
0.0
6.3
34.0
63.0
1007.0
276.9
263.9
136.1
3.5
405.0
7.3
6.8
3.9
53.0
FILE RECORD
TF1
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
115.0
1363.9
519.9
299.9
159.8
3.0
2125.0
7.6
2.9
1.6
300.0
TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
0.0
206.0
1516.8
596.8
401.9
190.1
5.5
2205.0
7.4
0.0
0.2
109.0
17 DATA
AL
DELETE
59.0
6.7
0.0
1.7
31.0
151.0
1595.0
530.0
783.9
397.8
20.0
1490.0
7.4
9.0
1.7
1.4
19 DATA
AL
DELETE
60.8
6.7
0.0
162.0
910.9
229.5
173.9
129.9
50.0
3240.0
7.6
1.7
4.2
FOR 8/ 7/68
OD
DELETE
51.0
7.0
0.0
32.5
90.0
995.9
298.8
266.1
186.1
12.0
560.0
7.3
3.0
1.9
1.1
CL2
DELETE
22.2
33.0
53.0
899.9
231.9
150.1
140.0
0.5
399.0
7.4
8.2
3.6
FOR 8/ 9/68
OD
DELETE
52.9
7.0
0.0
77.0
1194.9
373.8
266.1
133.9
3.0
1250.0
7.6
1.3
0.8
CL2
DELETE
22.2
109.0
1287.0
461.9
297.8
157.7
0.7
1890.0
7.4
0.9
1.8
DAY 220 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
FEED-GPM 33.3 22.2
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0
RECY-GPM 33.3 0.0
D.O. 2.0 0.4 5.7
TEMP - C 37.5 34.0 34.0
BOD5 277.0 136.0 145.0
TS 1871.9 1416.0 1463.0
VTS 723.8 470.9 496.8
SS 597.8 414.1 302.1
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
235.
0.
2490.
8.
6.
2.
,8
,1
0
6
9
5
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
224
PF
7.
37.
169.
1240.
421.
299.
132.
0.
1670.
8.
8.
1.
IN
187.9
0.3
1670.0
7.6
1.3
2.
0.
120.
FILE
0
4
0
130.0
2,
.5
1990.0
7,
,5
0.7
1.
,6
RECORD
TF1
7
0
0
9
9
9
1
1
0
3
1
6
33.
24.
33.
0.
30.
113.
1045.
373.
142.
70.
0.
980.
7.
3.
3
0
3
0
0
0
9
9
2
1
2
0
5
9
0.4
0.
0
TF2
22.
24.
0.
8.
30.
124.
1157.
358.
254.
118.
4.
1200.
7.
3.
1.
97.
2
0
0
5
0
0
9
8
2
0
0
0
5
7
1
0
18 DATA FOR 8/ 8/68
AL 00 CL2
DELETE DELETE
60.8 52.9 22.2
6.7 7.0
0.0 0.0
0.9
31.0 32.0 33.0
205.0 160.0
1942.1 1356.0
669.0 405.4
1125.7 581.0
489.7
2.9
1670.
7,
3.
3.
0.
.0
,4
,6
,0
,0
20 DATA
AL
59.
6.
0.
2.
27.
8.
2.
0
7
0
6
0
3
3
257.9
20.0
1425.0
7.5
0.0
2.8
0.4
FOR 8/12/68
OD
DELETE
51.5
7.0
0.0
27.0
42.0
965.1
268.9
128.1
70.1
0.1
830.0
7.6
CL2
22
27
97
1142
374
230
129
0
1345
7
9
2
.2
.0
.0
.9
.8
. 1
.9
.5
.0
.4
.0
.1
SLUDGE-SETT
-------
SHEET 6
a
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
226 IN
PF
DELETE
188.0
1221.0
456.8
339.9
130.0
8.2
8.3
0.3
FILE RECORD
TF1
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
75.0
1134.0
393.0
304.2
132.1
1325.0
7.4
4.1
0.2
TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
0.0
81.0
21 DATA
AL
DELETE
60.8
6.7
0.0
2.9
27.0
78.0
1289.0
458.0
502.0
230.0
1750.0
8.2
0.1
2.9
2.8
FOR 8/14/68
00 CL2
DELETE DELETE
54.6 22.2
7.0
0.0
81.0
1015.0
332.9
173.9
75.9
1190.0
7.5
4.8
0.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RfcCY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
228 IN
PF
1.5
35.0
223.0
1671.9
701.8
467.8
169.9
0.2
2590.0
7.6
0.0
1.4
FILE RECORD
TF1
33.3
24.0
33.3
0.3
35.0
129.0
1452.0
567.0
411.9
155.9
1.6
2055.0
7.4
0.3
2.2
0.3
TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
0.0
35.0
225.0
1678.0
668.8
522.1
223.9
4.0
2600.0
7.6
0.0
3.1
170.0
23 DATA
AL
60.8
6.7
0.0
2.7
31.0
79.0
1361.9
471.9
527.9
233.7
18.0
1425.0
7.7
0.0
2.4
2.8
FOR 8/16/68
OD CL2
DELETE
54.6 22.2
7.0
0.0
31.0 31.0
170.0
1450.0
582.0
386.0
169.9
0.5
2050.0
7.5
0.0
2.2
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
227 IN
PF
FILE
TF1
RECORD
TF2
22 DATA
AL
FOR 8/15/6S
OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
ss
vss
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4
35
191
0
1890
.3
.0
.0
.2
.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
233
IN
PF
33.3
24.0
33.3
0.0
33.0
88.0
1367.9
467.9
438.2
190.1
2.3
1800.0
7.6
0.3
0.6
0.0
130.0
FILE
TF1
22.
24.
0.
33.
165.
1501.
543.
574.
248.
8.
1860.
7.
0.
0.
113.
RECORD
2
0
0
0
0
9
8
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
60
6
0
2
29
127
1893
692
1055
479
34
2340
0
0
2
.0
.7
.0
.7
.0
.0
.9
.7
.9
.6
.0
.0
.0
.1
.7
24 DATA
TF2
AL
54
7
0
29
FOR
.0
.0
.0
.0
22
33
113
1284
448
247
105
0
1150
7
0
0
.2
.0
.0
.9
.8
.8
.8
.8
.0
.8
.6
.3
8/21/68
OD
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
3
41
174
1430
516
472
173
17
1575
9
4
11
.5
.0
.0
.9
.0
.1
.9
.0
.0
.1
.2
.0
SLUDGE-SETT
42.0
24.0
44.0
38.5
95.0
1134.9
408.0
292.0
187.9
1.5
1200.0
7.5
0.6
43.
24.
0.
3.
95.
1133.
389.
321.
197.
995.
7.
0.
2.9 4.
0.2
7.5
55.
5
0
0
5
0
0
9
9
7
0
4
7
9
0
60
6
0
1
32
104
1873
693
906
465
30
.0
.7
.0
.6
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
2490.0
7
0
1
1
.7
.1
.7
.4
52
7
0
31
60
1290
494
351
209
10
1425
7
0
2
1
.9
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.0
.0
.8
.0
.6
.6
44
55
970
340
270
128
0
1135
7
0
1
.4
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.1
.0
.4
.5
.5
-------
SHFET 7
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
to
CO
W
W
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOD 5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
234
PF
0.
41.
213.
1468.
566.
446.
115.
0.
1830.
IN
0
0
0
0
9
1
9
4
0
7.5
1.
0.
,7
,7
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 238
FILE RECORD 25 DATA FOR 8/22/68
TF1 TF2 AL OD CL2
44.4
24.0
44.4
38.0
147.0
1215.0
424.9
257.8
176.0
1.1
1360.0
7.2
0.0
2.6
0.5
2.0
DELETE
44.4
24.0
0.0
DELETE
60.8
6,
0.
1.
.7
.0
.6
52
7
0
.9
.0
.0
44
•
4
32.0
164.0
1378.9
517.9
414.1
186.1
0.3
1490.0
7.2
0.0
0.3
169.0
IN FILE RECORD
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
1
39
235
1564
703
420
162
0
2010
8
0
2
.4
.0
.0
.9
.9
.2
.0
.8
.0
.4
.0
.9
SLUDGE-SETT
TF1
44.4
24.0
44.4
33.0
163.0
1546.9
626.9
468.1
218.1
2.0
2100.0
7.3
0.0
2.5
0.3
16.0
TF2
DELETE
44.4
24.0
0.0
1.4
33.0
187.0
1569.0
681.9
453.7
211.7
2.8
1800.0
7.4
0.0
2.5
139.0
1,
.3
90
1612
562
759
369
25
2160
7
3
1
2
.0
.0
.9
.8
.8
.0
.0
.5
.1
.9
.0
27 DATA FOR
AL
00
169
1781
658
895
424
14
1390
*
•
•
•
•
•
*
0
0
0
9
1
0
0
8/26/68
CL2
DELETE
58
6
0
2
29
94
1656
727
818
422
19
2205
7
1
2
1
.0
.7
.0
.3
.0
.0
.9
.8
.1
.0
.0
.0
.5
.4
.8
.9
50
7
0
121
1615
642
632
284
23
2050
7
2
3
1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.6
.8
.0
.6
44
139
1455
570
426
196
5
1890
7
5
0
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
4
0
0
9
0
2
0
0
5
6
1
DAY
235
IN FILE
PF
TF1
RECORD
TF2
26 DATA FOR 8/23/68
AL
OD
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
43.0
24.0
44.0
44.0
24.0
0.0
0.0
41.
129.
1532.
562.
366.
222.
1.
0
,0
1
9
2
1
5
1670.0
8.
8.
0.
5
4
3
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
B005
TS
VTS
SS
vss
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-60D
241
PF
4.
35.
152.
1380.
647.
315.
135.
0.
1770.
8.
7.
3.
IN
9
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
8
8
0
SLUDGE-SETT
105.0
1430.0
559.0
267.9
177.9
2.0
1250.0
7.7
9.0
1.6
31.0
126.0
1510.0
568.9
350.0
212.0
3.0
1350.0
7.8
5.0
1.3
123.0
FILE RECORD
TF1
44.0
24.0
44.4
31.0
69.0
1382.9
691.8
231.0
122.9
0.4
1220.0
7.6
4.2
1.2
1.0
0.4
TF2
DELETE
44.0
24.0
0.0
143.0
1685.0
812.0
460.0
203.0
1.8
1770.0
7.6
5.6
1.7
60.0
6.7
0.0
1.0
32.0
59.0
1407.0
540.8
374.1
235.8
8.0
1190.0
7.8
2.8
0.7
0.4
28 DATA
AL
60.0
6.7
0.0
3.8
25.0
44.0
1469.0
792.9
265.0
131.9
2.0
1000.0
7.6
1.4
1.5
3.5
52.9
7.0
0.0
53.0
1464.9
515.9
393.9
245.9
12.0
1270.0
7.8
3.4
9.0
0.9
44.4
123.0
1629.0
618.8
450.1
227.9
5.0
1700.0
7.7
4.5
2.9
FOR 8/29/68
OD
DELETE
52.0
7.0
0.0
79.0
1470.0
695.0
311.8
149.9
9.0
1090.0
7.6
2.8
1.6
2.8
CL2
DELETE
44.4
-------
M
W
H
00
SHEET 8
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
IMEAD-FHOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
c»
DAY 248 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
29 DATA FOR 9/
AL
00
5/68
CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
vss
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
3.
36.
176.
1247.
490.
296.
168.
13.
1150.
8.
0.
0.
3
0
0
1
9
0
1
0
0
5
3
7
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
261
PF
IN
44.
24.
44.
34.
81.
1067.
350.
176.
119.
0.
650.
7.
3.
0.
0.
3.
FILE
4
0
4
0
0
9
9
0
9
3
0
8
0
9
5
0
44
24
0
140
1242
479
306
191
5
910
7
4
1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.9
.0
.0
.9
.1
.3
RECORD
TF1
DELETE
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
1BO.
1390.
526.
491.
212.
0.
0
9
7
9
0
5
DELETE
11.
24.
11.
22.
1053.
335.
252.
126.
3.
800.
7.
5.
2.
1
0
1
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
7
2
I
TF2
DELETE
22
16
22
112
1400
475
629
293
7
1700
7
5
2
35
.2
.0
.2
.0
.9
.8
.a
.8
.0
.0
.5
.0
.4
.0
67.
6.
0.
2.
28.
144.
1210.
422.
419.
237.
23.
800.
7.
0.
2.
1.
0
7
0
0
0
0
9
8
9
7
0
0
8
6
0
8
31 DATA
AL
DELETE
30.
6.
0.
6.
24.
42.
1175.
360.
1413.
1217.
30.
1000.
7.
0.
2.
3
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
9
0
0
8
5
5
50.
7.
0.
165.
1345.
504.
484.
256.
17.
950.
7.
0.
1.
3.
FOR
OD
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
8
6
6
2
9/18/68
DELETE
109.4
7.
60.
34.
72.
1330.
462.
574.
256.
26.
1370.
7.
0.
2.
2.
70.
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
6
0
7
5
0
CL2
DELETE
109.4
70.0
990.9
288.9
209.9
113.8
0.2
600.0
7.6
0.1
1.1
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
259
PF
IN
FILE
RECORD
TF1
DELETE
FEEO-GPM
D6PTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
B005
TS
VTS
SS
vss
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
DELETE
13.0
1.
42.
203.
0.
I
0
0
0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
262
PF
IN
24.
7.
28.
34.
1116.
469.
124.
68.
0.
975.
7.
2.
2.
1.
2.
FILE
0
0
0
0
9
e
2
0
0
0
5
0
4
5
5
TF2
DELETE
33.
16.
53.
31.
108.
0
0
0
0
0
1206.0
496.
191.
95.
5.
900.
7.
4.
1.
0
9
8
0
0
5
5
9
RECORD
TF1
DELETE
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
1304.
406.
455.
140.
0.
2050.
0
8
9
0
1
0
DELETE
11.
24.
11.
27.
1010.
2SO.
219.
73.
0.
725.
7.
6.
2.
0.
1
0
1
0
9
9
7
8
2
0
7
4
0
0
TF2
DELETE
22.
16.
22.
1420.
415.
589.
213.
7.
1850.
7.
0.
2.
2
0
2
9
9
9
8
0
0
4
7
7
30 DATA
AL
FOR
9/16/68
OD
DELETE
29.
6.
0.
5.
25.
39.
1154.
419.
207.
99.
4.
890.
7.
1.
2.
5.
0
7
0
3
0
0
9
8
8
7
5
0
7
1
5
5
32 DATA
AL
DELETE
94
7
60
32
44
.6
.0
.0
.0
.0
1190.9
528
118
66
2
735
7
0
1
4
38
FOR
.7
.1
.2
.0
.0
.7
.0
.3
.2
.0
CL2
DELETE
100.0
38.0
1080.9
483.9
83.9
49.7
0.5
700.0
7.6
0.0
1.8
9/19/68
00
DELETE
30.
6.
0.
6.
23.
1311.
395.
549.
231.
34.
1225.
7.
0.
3.
6.
3
7
0
8
0
0
0
9
9
0
0
7
5
3
0
DELETE
7
.0
CL2
DELETE
SLUDGE-SETT
-------
SHEET 9
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
-------
CO
a
SHEET 10
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY
275
PF
IN
FILE
TF1
RECORD
TF2
37 DATA FOR 10/ 2/68
AL OD CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5.
38.
209.
1445.
484.
632.
245.
5.
1800.
11.
2.
5
0
0
0
9
0
9
5
0
1
2
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
277
PF
4.
35.
242.
1609.
476.
656.
183.
2.
2300.
8.
8.
1.
IN
11.
24.
11.
25.
21.
995.
265.
186.
90.
575.
7.
3.
1.
4.
1.
FILE
1
0
1
0
0
0
8
1
0
0
5
8
6
5
5
TF1
6
5
0
9
8
1
9
0
0
7
3
2
11.
24.
11.
21.
54.
1035.
267.
36.
14.
975.
7.
6.
1.
1
0
1
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
5
4
22.2
16.0
22.2
6.5
32.0
99.0
1192.0
353.0
378.1
169.9
0.3
900.0
7.4
7.6
1.5
82.0
RECORD
TF2
DELETE
22.2
16.0
22.2
6.3
29.0
177.0
1411. 8
397.8
530.0
217.8
1175.0
7.7
3
0.7
23.0
30.
6.
0.
6.
21.
45.
1359.
438.
382.
177.
32.
950.
7.
0.
2.
6.
DELETE DELETE
3
7 7.0
0
6
0
0
1
0
0
8
0
0
7
7
Z
8
39 DATA FOR 10/ 4/68
AL
30.
6.
0.
7.
19.
144.
1374.
424.
32.
1350.
7.
1.
2.
7.
00 CL2
3
7 7.0
0
4
0
0
9
8
0
0
5
4
3
0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
276
PF
IN
FILE
TF1
RECORD
TF2
38 DATA FOR 10/ 3/68
AL 00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
.
4.
36.
249.
1410.
443.
487.
181.
0.
1925.
8.
9.
2.
9
5
0
9
8
9
8
8
0
3
6
4
11.
24.
11.
28.
48.
1026.
270.
195.
92.
0.
950.
7.
5.
1.
0.
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
1
5
0
6
6
6
4
22.
16.
22.
4.
33.
153.
1325.
427.
491.
221.
7.
1375.
7.
5.
2.
84.
2
0
2
6
5
0
0
9
9
8
0
0
4
6
3
0
30.
6.
0.
77.
1359.
419.
31.
1420.
7.
0.
2.
5.
3
7 7.0
0
0
1
9
0
0
6
6
9
4
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
282
PF
IN
FILE
RECORD
TF1
TF2
40 DATA FOR 10 / 9/68
AL
OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6.
35.
168.
1019.
306.
270.
127.
0.
1200.
8.
8.
3.
8
0
0
8
9
0
9
2
0
2
5
7
22.
24.
22.
26.
52.
975.
267.
132.
82.
1.
825.
7.
5.
1.
0.
2
0
2
0
0
9
3
1
0
2
0
4
7
1
2
14.
16.
29.
5.
29.
76.
1016.
294.
299.
159.
1.
825.
7.
5.
2.
63.
8
0
6
5
5
0
0
6
9
8
5
0
4
5
9
0
30.
6.
0.
6.
18.
172.
1837.
630.
1059.
491.
5.
2125.
7.
1.
5.
6.
3
7 7.0
0
8
0
0
0
0
8
7
5
0
4
6
4
5
SLUDGE-SETT
-------
SHEET H
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TO
H
pd
w
1-3
DAY 283 IN
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD 5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 287 IN
PF
FILE RECORD
TF1
22.2
24.0
22.2
40.0
937.9
220.8
177.9
61.9
3.0
600.0
7.6
5.8
1.4
166.0
TF2
DELETE
14.8
16.0
29.6
92.0
1082.0
28B.8
288.0
115.9
8.0
775.0
7.2
5.3
2.0
60.0
FILE RECORD
TF1
TF2
41 DATA FOR 10/10/68
AL OD CL2
30.3
6.7 7.0
0.0
5.5
21.0
127.0
1298.9
392.9
516.0
205.9
26.0
1200.0
8.2
0.3
2.2
5.6
43 DATA FOR 10/14/68
AL OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O. 5.0
TEMP - C
BOD5 203.0
TS
VTS
SS 390.0
VSS 126.0
SETT SOL 0.4
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN 7.6
PHOSPHOR 2.2
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
SLUDGE-SETT
22.2
24.0
22.2
0.0
32.0
74.0
1105.9
305.0
283.8
97.9
5.5
950.0
7.8
5.2
1.4
0.3
256.0
14.8
16.0
29.6
6.1
34.0
142.0
1317.9
395.8
440.0
169.9
9.0
1500.0
7.5
4.2
2.4
97.0
30.3
6.7 7.0
0.0
5.4
24.0
88.0
1318.9
397.9
23.0
1500.0
7.6
1.3
1.2
4.8
DAV 284 IN
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
8005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO -CON T.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
PF
5.0
36.0
186.0
1208.9
418.9
386.0
202.0
O.Z
1600.0
7.7
0.2
0.5
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
289 IN
PF
5.9
38.0
158.0
1315.9
417.9
408.0
151.9
1.0
1550.0
7.5
0.2
0.4
SLUDGE-SETT
FILE
TF1
22.2
24.0
22.2
27.0
48.0
1067.9
329.9
299.9
177.8
1.4
1050.0
7.6
7.2
1.9
0.3
237.0
RECORD
TF2
14.8
16.0
29.6
5.3
30.0
109.0
1243.8
425.9
462.0
245.9
6.0
1300.0
7.6
5.2
2.4
56.0
FILE RECORD
TF1
22.2
24.0
22.2
0.3
32.0
56.0
1069.0
304.9
198.0
90.0
3.0
725.0
7.5
3.0
1.5
0.1
250.0
TF2
14.8
16.0
29.6
6.5
33.0
88.0
235.9
111.9
6.0
750.0
7.4
1.3
1.1
80.0
42 DATA
AL
DELETE
30.3
6.7
0.0
6.4
19.0
93.0
1275.0
423.9
462.0
251.7
21.0
1175.0
7.9
1.6
3.6
6.4
44 DATA
AL
DELETE
30.3
6.7
0.0
5.3
24.0
148.0
531.9
227.9
38.0
1475.0
7.7
1.5
2.1
5.1
FOR 10/11/68
00 CL2
7.0
FOR 10/16/68
00 CL2
7.0
-------
SHEET 12
w
H
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 290 IN FILE RECORD 45 DATA FOR 10/17/68
PF
TF1
TF2
AL
OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-6PM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-CPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET -BOD
5.
34.
201.
1430.
537.
541.
235.
4.
2200.
7.
B.
0.
9
0
0
0
6
9
8
5
0
5
7
9
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
294
PF
IN
22.
24.
22.
0.
31.
65.
1135.
398.
260.
140.
1.
1050.
7.
4.
1.
0.
210.
FILE
TF
2
0
2
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
8
3
0
14
16
29
5
31
91
1250
462
390
213
7
1225
7
3
1
47
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
8
0
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
4
7
6
0
RECORD
1
TF2
30.
6.
0.
5.
24.
100.
1398.
509.
377.
235.
42.
15SO.
7.
0.
2.
5.
3
7
0
5
0
0
0
9
8
8
0
0
7
2
0
4
47 DATA
AL
7.0
FOR 10/21/68
OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
209.
1393.
0
1
458.0
382.
169.
1.
1925.
8.
0.
0.
0
9
0
0
9
1
9
14
16
19
115
1308
434
400
231
9
1425
47
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
8
0
6
0
8
8
0
9
0
0
0
30.
6.
0.
8.
19.
148.
1423.
483.
579.
353.
40.
1550.
6.
3
7
0
1
0
0
0
9
8
9
0
0
2
7.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 291 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
46 DATi
AL
DELETE DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
309
1725
716
459
209
0
100
2
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.0
.4
.0
22.
24.
22.
33.
110.
1286.
448.
365.
155.
2.
1700.
7.
3.
2.
1.
2
0
2
0
0
9
8
9
9
5
0
5
7
2
5
14.
16.
29.
168,
.8
,0
.6
.0
1716.0
634.
667.
311.
10.
2400.
7.
0.
2.
98.
,9
.7
,8
.0
.0
.6
,8
.1
,0
30,
6,
0,
4,
25
95,
1490,
523,
640,
302,
54,
1880,
7,
1
2
3,
.3
.7
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.8
.2
.0
.0
.0
.7
.1
.1
.8
SLUDGE-SETT
00
7.0
CL2
DAY 297 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
48 DATA
AL
FOR 1
00
DELETE DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4
37
203
1138
358
270
126
0
1000
7
7
1
.6
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.0
.5
.0
.2
.4
.6
SLUDGE-SETT
22.
24.
22.
0.
30.
106.
1179.
357.
359.
143.
9.
1175.
7.
5.
1.
0.
125.
2
0
2
5
0
0
9
8
8
7
0
0
2
9
2
2
0
14
16
29
1
32
153
1305
405
486
198
40
*
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
8
0
6
8
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1250.0
7
3
1
98
•
•
•
•
3
4
1
0
42
6
0
3
22
123
1500
615
708
325
2
.6
.7
.0
.6
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.8
.5
109.4
7.0
60.0
28.0
1450.0
7
1
1
3
.4
.1
.8
.3
2.6
CL2
-------
SHEET 13
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DAT* BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FHQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
ro
t-1
M
DAY 298 IN
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
B005 227.0
TS 1392.0
VTS 549.9
SS 486.1
VSS 266.0
SETT SOL 1.5
COLOR 1700.0
PH 8.1
NITROGEN 2.8
PHOSPHOR 0.8
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
SLUOGE-SETT
DAY 310 IN
PF
FILE RECORD
TFl TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
30.0
99.0
1231.9
427.0
455.9
249.8
3.0
1250.0
7.6
3.7
1.2
0.0
FILE RECORD
TFl TF2
49 DATA
AL
42.6
6.7
0.0
5.1
20.0
151.0
1506.0
554.8
747.9
419.9
40.0
1375.0
7.4
6.2
1.3
5.0
51 DATA
AL
FOR 10/25/68
00 CL2
109.4
7.0
60.0
26.0
4.8
FOR ll/ 6/68
OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
227
1582
537
692
334
0
2475
8
21
3
.0
.0
.8
.1
.1
.1
.0
.3
.4
.9
SLUDGE-SETT
29
22
0
155
1454
655
444
275
0
2600
7
6
3
950
.6
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.1
.0
.6
.0
.6
.0
14.
24.
29.
156.
1510.
540.
494.
332.
0.
1925.
7.
2.
2.
93.
8
0
6
0
9
0
0
0
4
0
8
3
8
0
41
6
0
8
20
99
1293
421
409
263
10
1250
7
2
1
7
.0
.7
.0
.8
.0
.0
.9
.8
.8
.9
.0
.0
.7
.0
.1
.9
109.
7.
60.
26.
24.
988.
257.
121.
12.
575.
7.
0.
1.
11.
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
8
8
0
0
DELETE
109.4
11.0
914.0
217.5
43.9
0.0
450.0
7.7
0.3
0.7
DAY 308 IN PILE RECORD
PF TFl TF2
DELETE
FEED-GPM 29.6 14.8
DEPTH-FT 22.0 24.0
RECY-GPM 0.0 29.6
0.0. 4.8 0.1 3.9
TEMP - C 38.0 28.0
BODS 281.0 137.0 108.0
TS 1465.9 1145.0
VTS 650.8 430.9
SS 559.9 260.0 339.9
VSS 240.1 126.0 163.8
SETT SOL 0.4 0.1 2.0
COLOR 2475.0 1650.0 1600.0
PH 8.2 7.4 7.6
NITROGEN 5.5 6.2 4.5
PHOSPHOR 2.4 1.3 1.7
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD 93.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 311 IN FILE RECORD
PF TFl TF2
50 DATA FOR ll/ 4/68
AL 00 CL2
DELETE
40.6
6.7 7.0
0.0
5.4
20.0
196.0
1315.0
462.8
516.0
245.9
12.0
1350.0
7.6
1.9
2.4
5.4
52 DATA FOR ll/ 7/68
AL 00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
B005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
181
1101
367
319
127
0
1500
8
11
2
.0
.0
.9
.8
.8
.5
.0
.3
.5
.6
29.
22.
0.
93.
953.
296.
169.
87.
0.
900.
7.
7.
2.
6
0
0
0
9
0
9
8
5
0
2
0
1
14
24
29
76
953
297
196
106
3
775
7
7
1
46
.8
.0
.6
.0
.0
.0
.2
.1
.5
.0
.3
.2
.4
.0
41
6
0
6
21
120
1171
378
351
169
7
1025
7
1
2
6
.0
.7
.0
.2
.0
.0
.1
.9
.8
.9
.0
.0
.4
.6
.6
.2
109
7
60
27
1677
628
881
422
.4
.0
.0
.0
.8
.8
.9
.0
2050.0
7
37
.3
.0
109.4
37.0
895.9
235.1
96.1
61.9
0.5
650.0
7.9
0.5
0.9
SLUDGE-SETT
-------
H
£
w
M
->
SHEET
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
-F-
DAY
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
312 IN
PF
6.2
35.0
229.0
1299.1
435.9
383.9
53.9
0.5
2600.0
8.6
12.5
3.0
FILE
TF1
29.6
22.0
0.0
24.0
93.0
0.0
0.0
184.0
14.0
0.2
1750.0
7.2
7.7
2.4
0.6
RECORD
TF2
14.8
24.0
29.6
5.0
24.0
129.0
1096.0
335.9
245.9
51.8
3.0
1750.0
7.4
6.2
1.9
70.0
53 DATA
AL
41.0
6.7
0.0
6.6
19.0
127.0
1195.9
395.8
366.2
108.0
16.0
1300.0
7.5
1.4
2.3
6.7
FOR ll/ 8/68
00 CL2
DELETE
109.4
7.0
60.0
23.0
1759.0
619.0
957.9
375.8
2550.0
7.3
30.0
DELETE
109.4
30.0
908.0
242.4
86.0
0.7
1025.0
7.8
0.0
0.7
SLuoGE-serr
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
6005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
317 IN
PF
5.9
36.0
185.0
1282.0
492.0
284.1
205.9
0.5
1700.0
B.I
9.4
1.0
FILE
TF1
29.6
22.0
0.0
21.0
87.0
1123.0
427.9
335.9
209.9
0.5
1250.0
6.9
4.3
0.9
1. 1
RECORD
TF2
14.8
24.0
29.6
4.5
24.0
136.0
1407.0
573.0
700.0
369.8
30.0
1550.0
7.1
5.9
2.5
72.0
55 DATA
AL
41.0
6.7
0.0
6.9
16.0
121.0
1312.0
495.9
588.0
323.7
23.0
1185.0
7.2
0.6
1.8
6.6
FOR 11/13/68
OD
DELETE
109.4
7.0
60.0
21.0
2145.9
814.8
1248.1
595.9
100.0
2000.0
7.1
21.0
SLUDGE-SETT
CL2
DELETE
109.4
21.0
964.9
285.9
171.8
107.7
0.7
350.0
7.2
0.5
0.5
100.0
DAY
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
315
PF
7.
36.
223.
1669.
850.
729.
281.
7.
2600.
.
10.
2.
IN
9
0
0
0
0
9
9
9
0
0
0
FILE
TF1
29.6
22.0
0.0
21.
165.
1334.
572.
372.
147.
0.
1750.
.
7.
0.
4.
0
0
9
0
0
9
4
0
2
7
3
9
RECORD
TF2
DELETE
14.8
24.0
29.6
6.
26.
172.
1321.
477.
495.
191.
6.
1400.
8.
8.
1.
93.
1
0
0
1
9
9
9
0
0
9
7
0
54 DATA
AL
41.0
6.7
0.0
7
16
125
1497
465
540
222
17
1200
1
2
7
.1
.0
.0
.0
.8
.1
.1
.0
.0
.9
.0
.1
FOR 11/11/68
00 CL2
109.4 109.4
7.0
60.0
25
1781
633
693
331
30
1650
45
.0
.0
.8
.9
.9
.0
.0
.0
45 .0
1217.0
348.9
242.0
132.1
22.0
775.0
0.8
1.4
SLwoce-serr
DAY
318
PF
IN
FILE
RECORD
TF1
TF2
56 DATA
AL
FOR
11/14/ftt
OD
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6.
36.
233.
1419.
667.
390.
222.
1.
1900.
12.
1.
4
0
0
0
9
0
1
0
0
9
4
29.
22.
0.
20.
93.
1138.
424.
242.
159.
0.
1300.
7.
6.
0.
2.
6
0
0
0
0
9
9
0
B
3
0
4
0
7
4
14.
24.
29.
120.
1269.
502.
321.
204.
0.
1500.
7.
9.
1.
94.
8
0
6
0
0
5
9
1
5
0
5
7
0
0
41
6
0
6
15
209
1622
642
812
508
30
1700
7
1
1
6
.0
.7
.0
.8
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.1
.0
109
7
60
22
945
344
127
101
.0 4000
.4
.1
.3
.9
7
11
.4
.0
.0
.0
.1
.0
.8
.9
.0
.2
.0
SLUDGE-SETT
109.4
11.0
894.0
313.7
90.0
0.3
350.0
7.5
1.2
0.5
70.0
-------
SHEET 15
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
to
v_n
pa
M
w
H
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD 5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
319
PF
5.
36.
234.
1484.
629.
587.
185.
1.
2500.
IN
4
0
0
0
9
7
7
0
0
8.6
11.9
1.9
FILE RECORD
TF1
29.6
22.0
0.0
24.0
98.0
1212.0
425.0
302.1
110.1
1800.0
7.2
5.6
1.0
0.1
TF2
14.8
24.0
29.6
4.5
28.0
158.0
1647.9
593.7
782.1
313.9
16.0
2300.0
7.4
9.5
1.7
89.0
57 DATA FOR 11/15/68
AL
41.0
6.7
0.0
5.6
17.0
195.0
1618.9
569.8
737.9
301.8
40.0
1700.0
7.5
0.8
2.3
5.6
OD
DELETE
109.4
7.0
60.0
23.0
2138.0
917.8
1273.8
541.8
100.0
2600.0
7.4
6.2
15.0
CL2
DELETE
109.4
15.0
935.0
250.9
111.9
27.7
0.5
500.0
7.6
0.1
0.4
SLUBGE-SETT
DAY 324
IN FILE RECORD
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
IBB
1195
382
279
90
8
13
1
.0
.9
.9
.8
.0
.7
.2
.7
TF1
14.8
22.0
0.0
91.0
2458.1
716.0
0.1
1450.0
7.1
7.8
0.8
TF2
22.2
24.0
22.2
138.0
1390.9
441.7
578.0
227.9
14.0
1350.0
7.2
7.1
2.1
54.0
59 DATA FOR 11/20/68
AL
41.0
6.7
0.0
150.0
1548.0
510.0
718.0
293.8
45.0
1450.0
7.2
0.3
1.6
OD
DELETE
109.4
7.0
60.0
3963.0
1489.6
2915.9
1143.9
7700.0
7.1
23.0
SLUDGE-SETT
CL2
DELETE
109.4
23.0
895.0
226.9
140.0
50.0
0.0
7700.0
7.1
0.8
0.6
60.0
DAY
322
PF
IN FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
58 DATA FOR 11/18/68
AL OO CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5.
34.
172.
1135.
445.
267.
198.
1.
1175.
8.
11.
1.
5
0
0
0
9
9
0
0
0
6
5
3
14
22
0
24
78
4723
4187
231
187
1
850
7
7
1
0
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.7
.9
.9
.5
.0
.2
.0
.4
.6
22.2
24.0
29.6
5.0
24.0
132.0
1545.8
570.8
852.0
382.0
20.0
1500.0
7.1
8.1
1.6
45.0
41.0
6.7
0.0
5.9
19.0
193.0
1546.0
562.7
763.8
411.9
55.0
1650.0
7.4
2.0
1.9
6.6
109.4
7.0
60.0
24.0
1757.9
696.8
426.0
255.6
115.0
2425.0
7.3
26.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
325
PF
IN
FILE RECORD
TF1
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6.
35.
319.
1755.
683.
749.
245.
0.
3500.
8.
9.
1.
0
0
0
9
9
8
9
5
0
7
0
1
DELETE
14
22
0
19
129
1365
486
455
162
0
1850
7
3
0
3
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.0
.5
.0
.4
.4
.7
.0
TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
177.0
1716.0
655.8
812.0
307.8
12.0
2600.0
7.3
4.2
0.9
94.0
109.4
26.0
892.0
302.3
109.8
8.0
550.0
7.4
0.8
0.7
1)0.0
60 DATA FOR 11/21/68
AL
DELETE
41.0
6.7
0.0
6.9
14.0
184.0
1647.0
789.9
830.0
341.7
60.0
1700.0
7.2
0.8
1.6
7.0
OO
109.4
7.0
60.0
21.0
3397.0
1391.7
2630.0
1131.6
250.0
5800.0
7.3
6.4
18.0
SLUDGE-SETT
CL2
109.4
18.0
937.0
318.9
132.1
42.1
O.O
0.0
0.5
200.0
-------
en
W
SHEET 16
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FMOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
TV)
DAY
326 IN
PF
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
61 DATA
AL
FOR
00
11/22/68
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
1
227
1549
522
393
163
1
2100
7
11
1
.0
.0
.9
.6
.9
.8
.0
.0
.9
.1
.9
14.
22.
0.
0.
21.
90.
8
0
0
0
0
0
1372.9
361.
315.
1.
1650.
7.
3.
1.
1.
9
8
0
0
1
9
5
4
22.2
24.0
22.2
5.5
22.0
115.0
1511.9
436.9
437.9
204.1
0.2
1800.0
7.1
5.0
1.3
91.0
41.
6.
0.
6.
15.
177.
1768.
727.
773.
343.
56.
1800.
7.
8.
1.
6.
0
7
0
5
0
0
0
8
9
9
0
0
3
2
5
6
109.
7.
60.
23.
4
0
0
0
DELETE
109
19
.4
.0
2078.0
1349.
9
1179.8
523.
116.
9
0
1750.0
7.
4.
19.
1
4
0
SLOOGE-SETT
DAY
331
IN
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
00-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
181
.0
1170.0
437
199
77
7
7
4
.0
.8
.8
.4
.3
.7
FILE
RECORD
TF1
14.
22.
0.
98.
1125.
0.
97.
65.
1100.
7.
4.
1.
0.
8
0
0
0
0
0
9
9
0
2
1
5
1
TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
225.0
1967.0
711.8
844.1
370.1
2125.0
7.3
17.1
4.5
134.0
63 DATA
AL
41.
6.
0.
6.
17.
167.
1571.
511.
604.
320.
1550.
7.
0.
3.
6.
0
7
0
6
0
0
9
9
2
0
0
4
6
0
8
FOR
0
500
7
0
0
150
.0
.0
.4
.3
.3
.0
11/27/68
00
109.
7.
60.
23.
5233.
2021.
4326.
1671.
9600.
7.
53.
4
0
0
0
0
5
1
6
0
3
0
CL2
109
53
1023
297
800
7
0
0
.4
.0
.1
.9
.0
.5
.0
.7
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEEO-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT .
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
329 IN
PF
DELETE
2.8
35
220
0
0
494
183
0
2000
7
1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.5
.0
.0
.8
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
DELETE DELETE
14.8 22.2
22.0 24.0
0.0 22.2
22.
116.
0
0
1454.0
432.
325.
118.
6.
1350.
5.
1.
1.
8
9
0
0
0
3
3
5
188.0
1679.0
527.8
532.2
234.0
7.0
1750.0
4.8
2.1
62 DATA
AL
DELETE
41.0
6.7
0.0
7.0
17
154
1735
622
785
353
58
1850
0
1
7
.0
.0
.9
.8
.8
.9
.0
.0
.8
.1
.7
FOR 11/25/68
OD CL2
109.4 109.4
7.0
*0.0
24
2648
1020
710
136
12*
7200
3
34
.0
.0
.0
.1
.0
.0
.0
.3
.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
336
IN
PF
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6
35
262
1078
321
195
83
1
800
7
0
0
.3
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.9
.0
.0
.4
.7
.5
FILE
TF1
RECORD
TF2
DELETE DELETE
14.
22.
0.
0.
23.
101.
1408.
463.
302.
128.
0.
1800.
7.
4.
1.
0.
8
0
0
1
0
0
9
9
1
1
2
0
2
0
6
1
22.2
24.0
22.2
5.7
27.0
178.0
1660.0
635.9
1062.0
485.7
21.0
1900.0
7.3
5.7
3.3
94.0
64 DATA
AL
FOR
34
.0
1172.0
353
0
800
0
I
.0
.3
.0
.3
.4
330.0
12/ 2/68
OD
CL2
DELETE
41
6
0
7
16
137
1645
579
664
299
1850
7
1
2
7
.0
.7
.0
.4
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.9
.0
.4
.0
.0
.7
109
7
60
23
.4
.0
.0
.0
1838.0
679
T55
342
60
2200
7
5
34
.9
.9
.0
.0
.0
.4
.8
.0
109
34
.4
.0
1184.9
339
124
44
1
700
7
0
0
.8
.2
.2
.0
.0
.6
.3
.6
SLUDGE-SETT
-------
SHEET 17
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
en
rc
w
DAY
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOO 5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-COW
SET-BOD
338 IN
PF
266.0
1479.9
587.8
374,
219,
.1
.9
0.5
1800.0
7,
.4
12.0
1.4
FILE RECORD
TFl TF2
DELETE
14.8 22.2
22.0 24.0
0.0 22.2
105.0 156.0
1339.8 1578.9
390,
248,
.8
,1
194.0
0.4
1300
7,
.0
.6
6.9
1.6
510.7
599.9
415.8
65.0
1550.0
7.5
1.9
1.0
30.0
65 DATA
AL
151.0
1605.0
535.9
678.
410.
7.
1.
1.
1
1
5
3
4
FOR
OD
109.
7.
60.
1559.
540.
8.
1670.
7.
45.
12/ 4/68
CL2
4 109.4
0
0
45.0
9 1119.9
8
0
0
4
0
321
144
117
1
600
7
1
0
.8
.0
.7
.5
.0
.5
.0
.5
SLUOGE-SETT
DAY
340
IN
PF
FILE RECORD
TFl
TF2
67 DATA
AL
FOR
00
12/
6/68
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5
33
344
2187
810
929
289
4
3700
7
10
1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.8
.0
.0
.2
.0
.4
14
22
0
3
18
123
1395
412
243
75
0
1800
7
7
0
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.1
.9
.8
.9
.2
.0
.5
.3
.5
22.2
24.0
22.2
5.9
24.0
166.0
1876.0
671.0
780.0
237.9
11.0
2400.0
7.4
6.4
1.0
103.0
41.
6.
0.
7.
13.
155.
1636.
526.
635.
239.
60.
1800.
7.
0.
1.
7.
0
7
0
5
0
0
0
9
9
8
0
0
3
0
6
5
109.
7.
60.
22.
4
0
0
0
109
53
1174
45.
2200.
7.
6.
53.
0
0
4
0
0
SLUDGE-SETT
364
87
33
0
800
7
1
0
55
.4
.0
.0
.8
.8
.8
.1
.0
.4
.8
.5
.0
DAY
339
IN
PF
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOO 5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
1
35
214
1722
601
499
211
0
2550
7
3
0
•
•
1
0
.0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
8
7
8
7
7
0
2
9
8
FILE RECORD
TFl
DELETE
14.8
22.0
0.0
18.0
139.0
1396.9
449.9
238.0
146.1
0.2
1550.0
7.6
8.1
0.8
0.6
TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
5.6
23.0
122.0
1557.0
465.8
504.1
254.1
11.0
1700.0
7.5
5.2
1.5
• 9.0
66 DATA
AL
FOR
12/ 5/68
00
CL2
DELETE
41.
6.
0.
7.
16.
131.
1697.
572.
760.
380.
50.
1700.
7.
2.
1.
7.
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
9
1
2
0
0
4
0
6
3
109
7
60
23
1824
638
7«7
303
0
2
54
.4
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.2
.5
.0
109
54
1096
461
142
92
0
875
7
1
e
.4
.0
.0
.9
.2
.1
.2
.0
.4
.8
.8
SLUOGE-SETT
DAY
413
IN
PF
DELETE
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
7
30
256
2153
609
996
•
•
•
•
•
•
302.
B
1800
•
•
7.
0
2
•
•
5
0
0
9
9
0
1
0
0
5
0
1
FILE RECORD 68 DATA
TFl
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
21.0
272.0
1936.0
484.9
661.9
194.0
1.7
2050.0
7.4
2.8
1.4
0.2
TF2
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
4.9
21.0
275.0
2283.9
634.7
611.8
239.8
4.0
2600.0
8.0
1.4
0.9
218.0
AL
FOR
2/17/69
OO
CL2
SLUDGE-SETT
-------
C/3
3
oo
SHEET 18
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 415 IN FILE RECORD 69 DATA FOR 2/19/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL 00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-6PM 33.3 33.3
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0
RECY-GPH 33.3 33.3
D.O. 7.1 4.7
TEMP - C 31.0 25.0 25.0
BOO5 176.0 122.0 153.0
TS 1534.1 15*4.0 1502.0
VTS 405.0 286.9 324.9
SS 223.9 225.8 278.0
VSS 12.1 39.9 87.8
SETT SOL 0.2 0.2 3.0
COLOR 1500.0 1750.0 1500.0
PH 7.1 6.9 7.1
NITROGEN 1.7
PHOSPHOR 2.8
DO-CONT. 0.3
SS-CONT. 5*64.2
VSS-CONT 1775.6
SET-BOO 130.0
SLUDGE-SETT 175.0
DAY 416 IN FILE RECORD 70 DATA FOR 2/20/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL OD CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM 33.3 33.3
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0
RECY-GPM 33.3 33.3
D.O. 6.3 4.0
TEMP - C 28.0 23.0 29.0
B005 286.0 189.0 222.0
TS 1816.1 1659.0 1653.9
VTS 582.9 414.1 460.9
SS 363.7 415.9 422.0
VSS *5.B 257.8 140.0
SETT SOL 0.2 0.8 5.5
COLOR 2050.0 1925.0 1800.0
PH 7.1 7.2 7.4
NITROGEN 0.0 0.0
PHOSPHOR 1.4 1.1
DO-CONT. 1.4
SS-CONT. 807.8
VSS-CONT 225.7
SET-BOD 166.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 417 IN FILE RECORD 71 DATA FOR 2/21/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL OD CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM 33.3 33.3
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0
RECY-GPM 33.3 33.3
D.O. 2.0 l.B
TEMP - C 29.0 21.0 21.0
BODS 490.0 310.0 376.0
TS 2900.0 2301.0 2717.1
VTS 731.6 543.0 683.9
SS 289.9 552.0 899.9
VSS 32.0 235.1 352.1
SETT SOL 0.1 3.0 4.0
COLOR 4100.0 3400.0 3700.0
PH 8.1 8.5 8.6
NITROGEN 5.6 2.8
PHOSPHOR 2.1 1.5
DO-CONT. 0.5
SS-CONT. 9273.9
VSS-CONT 2515.1
SET-BOO 346.0
SLUDGE-SETT 390.0
DAY 420 IN FILE RECORD 72 DATA FOR 2/24/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL 00 CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM 33.3 33.3
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0
RECY-GPM 33.3 33.3
0.0.
TEMP - C 24.0
BOD5 242.0 145.0 226.0
TS 1604.0 1542.9 1844.0
VTS 388.0 307.9 439.9
SS 559.9 350.0 619.8
VSS 81.7 79.9 183.7
SETT SOL 35.0 2.0 7.0
COLOR 1800.0 1600.0 1800.0
PH 8.3 7.8
NITROGEN 2.8
PHOSPHOR 1.5
DO-CONT. 0.4
SS-CONT. 7376.1
VSS-CONT 2381.7
SET-BOD 133.0
SLUDGE-SETT 210.0
-------
SHEET 19
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BV DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
to
ra
M
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
422 IN FILE RECORD 73 DATA
PF TF1
DELETE DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
9.0
29.0 21.0
294.0 129.0
1916.9 1543.0
594.8 416.0
608.2 415.9
219.9 176.0
6.0 1.2
2500.0 1600.0
8.2 7.5
1.4
2.4
0.5
10184.0
3717.1
TF2 AL
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
142.0
1566.0
451.0
315.8
140.0
1.0
1580.0
7.8
1.4
2.0
152.0
FOR 2/26/69
OD CL2
SLUDGE-SETT 330.0
DAY 424 IN FILE RECORD 75 DATA
FEED-GPH
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
PF TF1
33.3
24.0
33.3
7.1
31.0 23.0
314.0 226.0
1822.9 1596.9
559.8 451.9
476.0 365.9
172.0 191.9
0.7 0.6
1800.0 1600.0
7.1 7.2
8.4
1.8
1.0
9272.1
3479.8
TF2 AL
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
5.4
26.0
232.0 139.0
1612.0
459.9
386.0
195.9
6.5
1500.0
7.4
175.0
FOR 2/28/69
OD CL2
SLUDGE-SETT 220.0
DAY
423 IN
PF
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
74 DATA
AL
FOR 2/27/69
OD CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM 33.3 33.3
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0
RECY-GPM 33.3 33.3
D.O. 9.0 6.1
TEMP - C 31.0 22.0
BODS 202.0 176.0 190.0
TS 1502.9 1430.0 1513.9
VTS 521.9 427.8 423.7
SS 166.0 185.8 57.9
VSS 46.0 86.0 41.8
SETT SOL 0.1 0.0 0.0
COLOR 1600.0 1350.0 1450.0
PH 7.6 7.3 7.8
NITROGEN 14.6
PHOSPHOR 4.2
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT. 15895.9
VSS-CONT 5498.4
SET-BOD 166.0
SLUDGE-SETT 650.0
DAY 427 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
76 DATA FOR 3/ 3/69
AL OD CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6
33
332
2094
864
737
338
17
1900
7
7
3
.6
.0
.0
.8
.9
.9
.1
.0
.0
.1
.0
.2
SLUDGE-SETT
33
24
33
22
133
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
1414.9
444
185
75
0
1250
7
1
17510
7898
750
.8
.8
.9
.3
.0
.6
.7
.0
.7
.0
33.
24.
33.
178.
1679.
760.
494.
218.
7.
1550.
7.
124.
3
0
3
0
9
0
0
I
0
0
3
0
24
6
0
6
13
79
1593
500
396
180
1
1500
7
6
52
.4
.7
.0
.6
.0
.0
.9
.8
.1
.0
.8
.0
.5
.8
.0
62
4
62
0
23
563
263
0
1700
7
1
.5
.0
.5
.6
.0
.9
.9
.5
.0
.2
.2
62.5
1587.9
557.8
274.0
114.1
0.4
1600.0
7.3
10.0
-------
W
w
w
H
o
SHEET 20
LISTING OF
INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
O
DAY 429 IN FILE RECORD
PF
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-6P*
D.O.
TEMP - C
8005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
5
35
339
2050
842
563
262
0
2900
8
8
2
.9
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.1
.4
.0
.1
.4
.3
SLUOGE-SETT
DAY
431
TF1
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
222.0
1808.0
649.9
297.8
167.8
0.4
2300.0
2099.9
985.9
120.0
TF2
33
24
33
1
24
201
2080
1139
539
289
1
2750
7
5
2
137
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.8
.8
.5
.0
.8
.0
.5
.0
IN FILE RECORD
PF
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5
32
261
1602
719
280
122
0
1900
7
14
3
.5
.0
.0
.9
.8
.1
.0
.5
.0
.4
.0
.2
SLUDGE-SETT
TF1
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
22.0
174.0
1602.0
631.9
409.8
202.0
2.0
2200.0
7.2
0.6
13582.1
6501.7
770.0
TF2
33
24
33
5
27
168
1660
613
419
208
3
1900
7
125
.3
.0
.3
.4
.0
.0
.0
.8
.9
.1
.5
.0
.3
.0
AL
24.
6.
0.
6.
13.
62.
1407.
399.
141.
97.
0.
1200.
7.
6.
51.
4
7
0
5
0
0
0
8
9
9
2
0
4
5
0
79 DATA
AL
24.
6.
0.
6.
14.
53.
1439.
515.
235.
127.
0.
1100.
7.
6.
42.
00
62.
4.
60.
1.
23.
355.
235.
0.
1900.
7.
1.
64.
FOR
CL2
5
0
0
0
0
8
8
2
0
3
5
0
62
64
1652
545
150
97
0
1850
7
40
.5
.0
.0
.0
.1
.9
.1
.0
.3
.0
3/ 7/69
OD
4
7
0
5
0
0
9
9
9
8
5
0
5
7
0
62.
4.
60.
0.
23.
808.
374.
2.
2000.
7.
0.
61.
5
0
0
7
0
1
0
0
0
4
9
0
CL2
62
61
1574
617
680
326
1
2000
7
2
1
1016
428
32
.5
.0
.9
.8
.2
.1
.5
.0
.2
.8
.4
.2
.1
.0
DAY
430 IN
PF
DELETE
FEED-CM
OEPTH-M
RECY-em
D.O.
TEW - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-COMT
SET-BOO
4
34
227
1641
639
278
104
0
1850
7
11
2
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.0
.3
.0
.2
.2
.8
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
78 DATA
AL
FOR 3X 6/69
00 CL2
DELETE DELETE
33.
24.
33*
24.
102.
1417.
399.
169.
73.
0.
1700.
7.
0.
3
0
3
0
0
9
8
9
8
2
0
0
5
33.
24.
33.
3.
28.
147.
1625.
510.
469.
210.
2.
1800.
7.
3
0
3
9
0
0
0
9
9
0
3
0
2
24
6
0
6
14
55
.4
.7
.0
.5
.0
.0
62
4
60
0
24
.5
.0
.0
.6
.0
1430.0
405
216
110
0
1200
7
1
1
6
.9
.0
.1
.3
.0
.3
.4
.8
.2
269
145
0
1800
7
1
.7
.8
.5
.0
.1
.1
5989.9
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
434
IN
PF
2531.
110.
9
0
129.
0
FILE RECORD
TF1
TF2
48
.0
80 DATA
AL
93
FOR
.0
62.5
93.0
1563.1
475.9
351.8
195.9
0.3
1800.0
7.0
•34.0
349.9
30.0
3/10/69
OD
DELETE
FEEO-GPN
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
8
31
309
.3
.0
.0
1855.9
704
455
127
0
2200
7
9
3
.8
.9
.8
.2
.0
.5
.0
.0
SLUDGE-SETT
44.
24.
22.
22.
186.
1560.
470.
?53.
93.
12.
1800.
7.
2.
2.
0.
30.
4
0
2
0
0
9
9
9
9
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
44.
24.
22.
4.
24.
237.
1797.
550.
387.
166.
5.
4
0
2
3
0
0
9
8
8
0
0
1850.0
151.
0
24
6
0
5
15
73
1374
353
106
26
0
1000
5
51
.4
.7
.0
.1
.0
.0
.0
.9
.2
.2
.2
.0
.5
.0
60
4
82
0
22
307
163
0
1600
6
0
35
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
.9
.8
.1
.0
.9
.9
.0
CL2
DELETE
62.5
35.0
1501.9
460.9
184.0
95.8
0.1
1700.0
7.2
354.0
187.9
20.0
-------
SHEET 21
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
w
H
DAY 436
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET -BOO
4.
32.
287.
1938.
0.
606.
221.
4.
2125.
7.
8.
3.
IN
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
5
7
1
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 438
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
DELETE
44.4
24.0
22.2
25.0
130.0
1479.9
400.9
43.9
23.7
0.2
1750.0
0.0
5756.2
2403.7
160.0
44.4
24.0
22.2
184.0
1856.9
598.8
599.9
225.7
5.0
1800.0
7.1
3.1
1.2
131.0
IN FILE RECORD
PF
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
7,
32,
132,
4369,
1821,
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
484.0
87,
16,
1300,
.8
.0
.0
TF1
DELETE
44.4
24.0
22.2
26.0
123.0
1504.0
419.9
364.0
169.9
0.2
1550.0
7.8
0.2
TF2
DELETE
44.4
24.0
22.2
5.2
26.0
198.0
1781.0
626.0
536.1
236.1
8.5
1400.0
7.3
134.0
81 DATA
AL
24.
6.
0.
6.
12.
48.
1383.
355.
177.
90.
0.
1150.
7.
6.
42.
4
7
0
9
0
0
9
9
9
0
1
0
5
6
0
83 DATA
AL
DELETE
24.
6.
0.
7.
12.
54.
1365.
365.
205.
4
,7
0
,5
0
0
0
,9
,9
122.0
0.
950.
7.
7.
43.
,5
,0
6
6
,0
FOR 3/12/69
00 CL2
60
4
60
20
373
162
0
1650
7
89
FOR
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
0
0
0
0
8
0
4
0
3
0
62
89
1601
481
278
127
0
1750
7
.5
.0
.1
.9
.0
.8
.3
.0
.4
3/14/69
00
DELETE
60
4
80
1
21
316
177
1
950
7
1
7
•
•
*
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
*
•
0
0
0
1
0
1
9
2
0
3
3
0
SLUDGE-SETT
CL2
DELETE
62
7
1441
412
274
142
0
1200
7
903
364
30
.5
.0
.0
.1
.0
.1
.1
.0
.1
.9
.0
.0
DAY
437
IN FILE
PF
TF1
RECORD
TF2
82 DATA FOR
AL
00
3/13/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CQNT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6.
32.
175.
1778.
60S.
671.
314.
3.
1850.
9
0
0
1
9
9
0
0
0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
441
PF
44.4
24.0
22.2
24.0
91.0
15S5.9
498.0
453.7
279.8
1.0
1800.0
7.1
0.6
15934.1
6043.8
350.0
44.4
24.0
22.2
5.4
27.0
103.0
1475.9
436.7
285.9
221. 8
1.1
1425.0
6.9
94.0
IN FILE RECORD
TF1
TF2
24.4
6.7
0.0
6.3
12.0
46.0
1419.9
440.9
214.2
173.9
0.4
1175.0
7.4
3.4
0.8
6.5
35.0
60.0
4.0
80.0
0.6
20.0
531.9
314.8
0.2
1800.0
6.9
0.8
85.6
62.5
85.0
1495.0
483.9
397.9
299.9
0.8
1650.0
6.9
357.9
274.0
5.0
84 DATA FOR 3/17/69
AL
00
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
206.0
44.4
24.0
22.2
27.0
134.0
1781.0
554.9
509.9
221.8
1.5
1800.0
6.9
1.4
1.8
0.5
44.4
24.0
22.2
5.6
30.0
192.0
1968.0
669.9
683.8
293.8
7.5
2100.0
7.0
24.4
6.7
0.0
8.7
14.0
41.0
1433.1
450.9
207.8
115. 9
0.2
950.0
7.1
7.0
60.0
4.0
80.0
4.8
22.0
1401.9
572.1
33.0
5260.0
6.9
4.8
18901.9
SLUDGE-SETT
8498.3
200.0
138.0
33.0
86.0
62.5
86.0
1537.0
434.9
335.9
187.9
0.1
1500.0
7.1
884.0
383.8
5.0
-------
co
W
w
M
H
NJ
to
SHEET 22
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE KITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY
DEPTH-FT
RECY-€WI
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
DU
"n
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
443 IN
PF
DELETE
5
34
197
2657
447
548
141
36
2250
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.9
.0
.0
FILF RECORD
TF1 TF2
DELETE DELETE
44.4 44.4
24.0 24.0
22.2 22.2
29.
110.
1409.
346.
202.
68.
0.
1700.
.
6.
1.
0.
11842.
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
445
IN
PF
DELETE
FEED-CPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5
32
203
1634
597
338
169
0
1700
8
11
3
.4
.0
.0
.9
.9
.1
.9
.5
.0
.6
.2
.5
5375.
490.
FILE
TF
0
0
9
9
0
0
4
0
1
3
5
0
1
0
4.
29.
166.
1494.
370.
252.
81.
2.
1700.
•
154.
5
0
0
9
8
0
7
5
0
0
RECORD
1
DELETE
44.
24.
22.
26.
78.
6490.
469.
245.
108.
0.
1450.
7.
0.
13009.
SLUDGE-SETT
6623.
520.
4
0
2
0
0
0
8
9
0
3
C
5
7
9
3
0
TF2
DELETE
44.
24.
22.
4.
28.
129.
1457.
499.
1.
1400.
7.
114.
4
0
2
6
0
0
9
0
5
0
9
0
85 DATA
AL
DELETE
24.4
6.7
0.0
5
15
48
1427
405
163
75
0
1200
5
40
.9
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.2
.0
.9
.0
87 DATA
AL
DELETE
24
6
0
8
16
37
1426
404
229
137
0
1200
7
b
33
.4
.7
.0
.4
.0
.0
.0
.B
.7
.9
.3
.0
.8
.6
.0
FOR 3/19/69
00 CL2
DELETE DELETE
60.0 62.5
4.0
80.0
0.
24.
279.
151.
0.
1600.
U.
85.
FOR
00
5
0
8
9
6
0
5
0
85.0
1528.0
424.9
109.8
63.7
1.0
1700.0
2129.8
807.6
20.0
3/21/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
60.
4.
80.
0.
21.
0.
78.
0
0
0
3
0
4
0
62.5
78.0
1454.0
418.0
272.2
150.1
1.5
1100.0
30.0
DAY
FEED-«PM
DEPTH-FT
*ECY-«M
D.O.
TEMP - C
9005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
444 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
44.4 44.4
24.0 24.0
22.2 22.2
4.2 3.2
33
249
1470
700
242
110
0
1700
7
0
4
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.1
.0
.0
.5
.0
.3
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
448
29.
120.
1506.
534.
283.
123.
0.
1400.
7.
0.
11448.
5778.
$00.
IN FILE
PF
0
0
9
9
8
8
2
0
4
5
0
9
0
30.0
174
.0
1569.9
557
320
144
5
1400
.9
.1
.0
.0
.0
7.3
132
.0
RECORD
TF1
TF2
86 DATA FOR 3/20/69
AL 00 CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
24.4 60.0 62.5
6.7 4.0
0.0 80.0
5.7 0.5
17
.0
24.0
39.0
1363
505
155
82
0
1000
7
3
1
5
9
.0
.9
.9
.0
.0
.0
.6
.6
.1
.5
.0
88 DATA
AL
DELETE
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPK
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
179
2330
853
919
127
34
2400
.0
.0
.9
.7
.8
.0
.0
SLUDGE-SETT
44.
24.
22.
137.
1616.
492.
351.
151.
0.
1900.
7.
15042.
7563.
650.
4
0
2
0
9
8
a
9
6
0
9
1
1
0
44
24
22
159
1351
346
177
54
6
1100
7
5
1
130
.4
.0
.2
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.5
.0
.4
.6
.7
.0
24
6
0
65
1446
416
267
118
1
850
7
9
1
42
.4
.7
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.0
.0
.0
.6
.5
.6
.0
405.
202,
,8
,0
3.0
1450.0
7,
,5
32.0
1533.9
542.8
267.9
144.0
1.5
1450.0
7.5
5.0
1.6
0.6
32.
FOR
0
462.0
220.0
20.0
3/24/69
00
DELETE
60.
4.
80.
242.
163.
3.
1100.
7.
89.
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
3
0
CL2
DELETE
62.5
89.0
1466.9
409.7
259.7
121.7
0.5
1000.0
-------
SHEET 23
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
INDICATED
NJ
OJ
DAY
450 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
DELETE DELETE
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT,
VSS-CONT
SET -BOO
4
27
196
.0
.0
.0
1770.9
541
.0
442.1
176
0
1800
^
14
2
.0
.2
.0
.6
.8
.8
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
452
44.4
24.0
22.2
25.0
115.0
1782.9
558.9
579.8
238.0
1.5
1900.0
7.1
0.2
15617.9
7365.4
500.0
DELETE
44
24
22
5
27
178
1672
517
372
173
2
1850
7
166
.4
.0
.2
.3
.0
.0
.9
.1
.0
.9
.5
.0
.2
.0
IN FILE RECORD
PF
TF1
DELETE DELETE
FEEO-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
7
30
200
1697
565
484
232
2
1950
7
1
4
.5
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.2
.5
.0
.1
.5
.8
SLUDGE-SETT
44.4
24.0
22.2
27.0
94.0
1414.0
401.8
285.9
164. 1
0.2
1250.0
7.2
TF2
DELETE
44
24
22
5
28
178
1531
473
423
227
5
1750
7
2
.4
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.8
.9
.0
.0
.2
.4
89 DATA
AL
DELETE
24.
6.
4
7
0.0
5.
14.
46.
8
0
0
FOR
00
3/26/69
CL2
DELETE
62.
4.
60.
0.
20.
5
0
0
5
0
1345.0
324.
242.
124.
0.
800.
7.
6.
1.
5.
36.
9
0
1
5
0
1
1
1
4
0
91 DATA
AL
DELETE
24.
6.
0.
4.
14.
44.
1282.
351.
0.
850.
7.
4
7
0
8
0
0
9
9
2
0
6
375.
191.
3.
850.
7.
0.
68.
FOR
00
9
9
0
0
4
9
0
DELETE
62
68
1412
413
302
155
0
1100
7
2439
989
30
.5
.0
.9
.8
.1
.9
.2
.0
.4
.8
.8
.0
3/28/69
CL2
DELETE
62.
4.
60.
0.
21.
225.
177.
3.
1250.
7.
5
0
0
6
0
8
9
5
0
4
DELETE
62
67
1342
371
242
189
0
1150
7
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.2
.0
.4
2.P
0.0
15180.0
7590.0
900.0
130
.0
4.
37.
5
0
0.
67.
8
0
408
243
30
.0
.8
.0
DAY
451 IN FILE
PF TF1
RECORD
TF2
90 DATA
AL
FOR 3/27/69
00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
7
31
219
1699
573
428
209
3
1950
7
9
2
.4
.0
.0
.9
.7
.1
.9
.0
.0
.8
.0
.3
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
455
44.
24.
22.
24.
66.
1270.
370.
209.
148.
0.
1200.
7.
0.
16600.
8529.
550.
4
0
2
0
0
9
8
9
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
IN FILE
PF
TF1
44
24
22
5
26
134
1490
453
335
176
2
1450
7
111
.4
.0
.2
.8
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.0
.0
.0
.2
.0
RECORD
TF2
24
6
0
7
13
43
1296
402
162
100
0
800
0
0
0
7
85
.4
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
*2 DATA
AL
62
4
60
0
19
238
158
3
1250
7
0
50
FOR
.5
.0
.0
.4
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
.6
.0
62.5
50.0
1259.0
358.9
163.8
117.7
0.0
1250.0
7.2
1.9
1.1
4344.1
1*03.8
30.0
3/31/69
00
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
6
2B
317
2059
631
.8
.0
.0
.9
.7
1473.9
1203.8
1
2050
7
0
0
.8
.0
.1
.6
.9
SLUDGE-SETT
44.
24.
22.
24.
134.
1809.
545.
484.
303.
1.
1750.
7.
3.
1.
0.
13713.
6462.
240.
4
0
2
0
0
9
8
0
9
0
0
2
7
3
5
9
0
0
44
24
22
5
25
193
1685
478
426
171
2
1750
7
165
.4
.0
.2
.8
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.7
.6
.0
.3
.0
30
6
0
6
13
80
.4
.7
.0
.3
.0
.0
31
4
40
3
15
.2
.0
.0
.6
.0
31.2
1499.0
397
354
163
3
1200
7
6
47
.8
.0
.8
.0
.0
.3
.5
.0
4
.0
10.0
-------
SHEET 24
H
NJ
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BV DATE MITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FHQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT I
OAV
457 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-CM
OCPTH-FT
RICY-W*
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
vss
SETT SOL
cot on
PH
NITMtEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-COO
17*
1*21
539
450
295
0
950
•
6
4
.0
.0
.9
.1
.8
.8
.0
.1
.8
.0
SLMtGE-SETT
DAY
459
44.4
24.0
22.2
109.0
1426.0
403.0
312.1
1*5.9
1.4
1050.0
7.3
15451.9
70*9.2
390.0
93 DATA
AL
DELETE DELETE
44
24
22
200
1616
532
533
274
3
1250
7
5
2
129
.4
.0
.2
.0
.9
.9
.7
.0
.5
.0
.1
.4
.6
.0
IN FILE RECORD
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-6PM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
vss
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
5
32
160
1663
586
379
139
0
1650
7
12
3
.2
.0
.0
.0
.8
.9
.7
.7
.0
.8
.5
.6
SLUDGE-SETT
TF1
DELETE
44.4
24.0
22.2
27.0
47.0
1475.0
510.9
314.0
100.0
2.0
1350.0
6.9
0.6
14432.0
7182.8
330.0
TF2
30.
6.
0.
74.
1423.
403.
230.
158.
2.
680.
7.
58.
4
7
0
0
9
9
1
0
0
0
4
0
95 DATA
AL
FOR
00
4/ 2/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
31.
4.
40.
335.
227.
0.
900.
7.
57.
FOR
00
2
0
0
9
9
9
0
4
0
31
57
1322
338
175
144
0
7
213
169
0
.2
.0
.0
.9
.7
.0
.1
.5
.9
.9
.0
4/ 4/69
CL2
DELETE
44
24
22
5
30
136
1706
689
487
267
3
1650
6
89
.4
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.8
.5
.0
.9
.0
30.
6.
0.
5.
17.
29.
1340.
441.
171.
77.
4.
900.
7.
6.
18.
4
7
0
9
0
0
9
8
8
8
5
0
4
0
0
31.
4.
40.
4.
18.
0.
900.
7.
5.
26.
2
0
0
8
0
2
0
2
0
0
31
26
1251
374
133
73
7
3
1
346
144
0
.2
.0
.9
.9
.9
.8
.1
.8
.4
.0
.0
.0
DAY 458 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
94 OAT* FOR 4/ 3/69
AL 00 CL2
DELETE
FEEO-CPM
OCPTH-fT
RECY-6PN
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
*
32
185
.0
44
24
22
•
*
*
.0 27.
.0
1284.0
483
213
128
0
1100
8
10
0
.0
.9
.1
.8
.0
.1
.6
.7
SLUDGE-SETT
88
1439
425
388
200
2
1*50
7
9
13847
*42S
220
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
4
0
2
0
0
0
9
1
1
5
0
2
5
9
4
0
44
24
22
5
28
207
1592
575
538
283
4
1800
7
120
.4
.0
.2
.8
.0
.0
.1
.0
.0
.8
.0
.0
.1
.0
30
6,
0.
5
16.
48
1328.
460
173.
141,
3.
1000,
7,
3,
2,
6,
92.
.4
.7
.0
.9
.0
.0
.8
.8
,9
.8
,5
.0
.9
.5
.0
,1
.0
31
4
40
4
17
231
154
0
15M
7
4
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.4
.0
.3
.4
DAY 462 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
9* DATA
AL
FOR 4/ 7/*9
00 C12
DELETE
FEED-CPU
DEPTH-fT
RECY-6PN
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
vss
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
4
33
180
1579
592
3*3
137
0
1650
7
10
3
.3
.0
.0
.8
.9
.7
.9
.3
.0
.2
.4
.3
SLUDGE-SETT
44
24
22
26
.4
.0
.2
.0
29
24
14
4
28
10*
.6
.0
.8
.9
.0
.0
1439.*
0
18944
8848
370
.1
.0
.7
.0
430
198
82
1
1300
141
.9
.0
.0
.2
.0
.0
30
6
0
6
19
84
1654
619
574
261
10
1450
7
6
31
.4
.7
.0
.8
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.8
.5
.0
.4
.9
.0
31
4
40
2
20
223
92
0
950
7
9
38
.2
.0
.0
.9
.0
.9
.1
.2
.0
.3
.1
.0
31.2
38.0
1295.9
382.9
180. 0
104.0
0.1
7.3
379.9
176.0
5.0
-------
SHEET 25
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
to
U)
VJl
en
ffi
N3
Ul
DAY 476
PF
IN
FILE
TF
RECORD
1 TF2
97 DATA
AL
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DIPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O. 6.
TEMP - C 33.
BOOS 205.
TS 1*95.
VTS 470.
SS 270.
VSS 164.
SETT SOL 0.
COLOR 1550.
0u f
PH ' .
NITROGEN 9.
PHOSPHOR 2.
DO-CUNT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CBNT
SET-ftOB
SLUVCE-SETT
DAY 479
PF
0
0
0
0
9
0
1
2
0
0
7
IN
29.
24.
14.
27.
145.
1692.
552.
405.
225.
10.
1550.
4.
2.
0.
1225.
521.
25.
FILE
TF
6
0
»
0
0
9
9
8
7
0
0
2
1
«
8
7
0
29
24
14
4
30
178
1640
473
467
277
15
1700
6
3
109
.6
.0
.8
.8
.0
.0
.0
.7
.8
.9
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
RECORD
1
TF2
30.
6.
0.
4.
19.
71.
1484.
421.
420.
210.
11.
1300.
4.
24.
4
7
0
8
0
0
0
9
2
2
0
0
9
0
99 DATA
AL
FOR 4/21/69
OD CL2
DELETE
31
4
40
1
20
285
167
3
1200
1
40
FOR
.2
.0
.0
.7
.0
.9
.8
.5
.0
C
. J
.8
.0
DELETE
31
40
1219
326
126
126
0
1000
858
379
20
.2
.0
.0
.9
.0
.0
.1
.0
•a
• 3
.1
.9
.0
4/24/69
OD
DELETE
FEED-SPN
DEPTH-FT
RECV-6PM
D.O.
TEMP - C
6005 238.0
TS 1427.
0
VTS 590.9
SS 428.
VSS 177.
SETT SOL I.
COLOR 2000.
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
SLUDGE-SETT
1
9
2
0
29.
24.
14.
137.
1437.
492.
1655.
801.
5.
1800.
7.
202.
0.
20.
6
0
8
0
9
9
8
9
0
0
1
0
0
0
29
24
14
0
29
135
1324
539
194
169
0
1650
7
168
.6
.0
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.9
.6
.0
.2
.0
30.
6.
0.
5.
19.
73.
1353.
480.
284.
212.
6.
1100.
7.
6.
36.
4
7
0
7
0
0
9
9
1
0
5
0
4
0
0
DELETE
31
4
40
3
19
530
138
9
.2
.0
.0
.3
.0
.0
.1
.0
1450.0
7
68
.4
.0
CL2
DELETE
31
68
1189
436
167
159
0
850
7
487
274
10
.2
.0
.8
.8
.8
.9
.4
.0
.6
.9
.0
.0
DAY
478 IN
PF
FILE
TF1
RECORD
TF2
98 DATA
AL
FOR 4/23/69
00 CL2
DELETE
FEEO-CPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-MI*
5
32
204
1430
764
299
355
0
1450
g
9
3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.8
.4
.0
.8
.2
.3
SLUBSE-SETT
DAY
480
IN
PF
DELETE
FEED-CPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-€PM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BO 05
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
DU
r n
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
6
29
384
1860
739
0
2550
4
2
.2
.0
.0
.9
.7
.2
.0
.7
.3
SLUDGE-SETT
29.
24.
14.
25.
109.
1372.
692.
315.
4.
1300.
7.
0.
629.
491.
15.
FILE
6
0
8
0
0
9
a
e
0
0
0
5
8
9
0
TF1
29.6
24.0
14.8
5.0
28.0
157.0
1388.0
700.0
9.0
1400.0
7.2
30
6
0
4
20
72
.4
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
31
4
40
2
21
.2
.0
.0
.1
.0
1427.0
602
378
368
9
1100
7
6
2
4
.9
.1
.0
.0
.0
.4
.4
.8
.0
563
422
10
1600
•
2
.9
.0
.0
.0
.1
.5
31
62
1264
472
173
0
0
950
7
27**
.2
.0
.9
.8
.9
.0
.1
.0
.5
.1
1331.8
96.0
RECORD
TF2
36
.0
100 DATA
AL
DELETE DELETE DELETE
29.
24.
14.
27.
174.
2696.
572.
390.
144.
5.
2150.
0.
1543.
699.
35.
6
0
a
0
0
9
8
0
0
0
0
2
8
6
0
29.6
24.0
14.8
7.0
222.0
1686.0
581.0
314.0
140.0
3.5
2000.0
207.0
30
6
0
1
20
86
1553
493
466
208
9
1600
0
43
.4
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.1
.0
.0
.5
.0
62
FOR
.0
50
.0
4/25/69
OD
DELETE
31
4
40
0
20
541
249
8
1850
0
43
.2
.0
.0
.4
.0
»9
.9
.0
.0
.4
.0
CL2
DELETE
31
43
1195
406
173
101
0
10M
118
90
5
.2
.0
.9
.9
.9
.9
.4
.0
.1
.0
.0
-------
SHEET 26
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT I
to
Vo)
O
DAY 483 IN FILE RECORD 101 DATA FOR
PF TF1 TF2 AL 00
4/28/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE DELETE
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
vss
SETT SOL
COl ON
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
301
1510
563
221
157
0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.7
.6
1550.0
7
4
2
.2
.5
.8
29
24
14
196
1651
595
570
344
6
1800
7
5
3
3483
.6
.0
.8
.0
.0
.8
.0
.2
.5
.0
.2
.5
.0
.8
29
24
14
214
1511
577
135
6
.6
.0
.8
.0
.9
.8
.8
.0
1550.0
7
.1
30
6
0
102
1820
642
733
393
16
1900
7
.4
.7
.0
.0
.9
.0
.9
.9
.0
.0
.5
31.
4.
40.
2
0
0
1470.0
685.
33.
4900.
7.
9
0
0
4
1739.5
SLUDGE-SETT
80
.0
171
.0
63
.0
69.
0
31.2
69.0
1296.0
420.0
149.8
144.0
0.2
1100.0
7.6
880.1
425.9
20.0
DAY 4B6 IN FILE RECORD 103 DATA FOR 5/ 1/69
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
vss
SETT
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
SLUDGE-SETT
PP TF1 TF2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
29.6 29.6
24.O 24.0
14.8
5.9
33.0 28.0
183.0
SOL
251.0
1446.9
437.8
233.7
51.8
2.5
1200.0
7.3
8.1
2.9
14.8
4.8
30.0
183.0
1285.0 1240.0
358.9 343.0
205.9
49.8
2.0
1000.0
7.2
0.5
6076.0
2905.5
130.0
186.1
44.2
0.0
900.0
7.3
AL 00
DELETE DELETE
30.4 31.2
6.7 4.0
0.0 40.0
2.8 1.0
21.0 21.0
86.0
1452.0
481.9
46.0 4639.8
6.1 1869.4
10.0 200.0
950.010000.0
7.4 7.3
3.7
2.1
2.9 1.1
CL2
DELE7E
31.2
36.0
1219.0
295.9
124.2
0.0
850.0
7.5
152.0 44.0 36.0
9150.0
3273.8
190.0
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
vss
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
OO-COHT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
485 IN
PF
DELETE
6.0
32.0
205.0
1584.0
514.9
311.8
95.8
1.0
1350.0
13.7
3.4
SLUOSt-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-«PM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
487 IN
PP
3.6
34.0
168.0
1442.1
510.9
220.0
162.0
1.0
1500.0
7.3
8.0
2.7
SLUDGE-SETT
FILE RECORD 102 DATA
TF1
DELETE
29.6
24.0
14.8
27.0
89.0
1539.0
429.9
436.0
140.0
2.5
1350.0
0.4
3975.8
1925.8
1*0.0
TF2
DELETE
29.6
24.0
14.8
105.0
1342.0
375.8
82.0
59.8
0.4
10VO.O
6.5
1.7
1*9.0
AL
DELETE
30.4
6.7
0.0
3.4
21.0
79.0
1706.8
481.8
602.1
226.0
18.0
16OO.O
3.5
30.0
FOR 4/30/69
OD
DELETE
31.2
4.0
40. 0
1.1
22.0
35*7.9
1439.4
99.9
60*0 .0
1.2
23.*
FILE RECORD 1*4 DATA FOft 9
TF1
DELETE
29.6
24.*
14.8
28.0
56.0
1257.0
379.8
123.9
97.9
1.0
1200.0
7.4
0.5
5986.0
2957.6
230.0
TF2
AL
OB)
CL2
DELETE
31.2
23.0
1195.0
259.9
109.8
17.9
0.0
•OO.O
1557.9
6*3.8
4*.*
I/ 2/69
CL2
DELETf DELETE
29.6
24. O
14.8
4.2
30.0
117.0
1460.1
519.9
281.9
169.9
5.0
1300.0
7.4
90.0
30.4
6.7
0.0
2.5
22.0
85.0
1569.0
509.9
383.9
3*9.7
26.0
31.X
4.0
40.0
0.7
23.0
75*3.9
2927.2
325.0
1500.0110*0.*
7.5
2.4
46.0
7.3
0.8
24.0
31.2
24.0
1238.0
350.9
159.9
123.8
0.0
1200.0
7.4
6.3
1.7
1140.1
512.0
30.0
-------
SHEET 27
LISTING OF
INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 490 IN FILE RECORD
V)
PC
w
w
H
PF
FEED-GPN
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PN
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-C0NT
SET-iOD
7
33
221
1464
514
39
17
1
1200
7
13
2
.5
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.9
.0
.0
.1
.7
.0
SLU0GE-SETT
BAY
493
IN
PF
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
8005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5
28
173
1483
438
368
110
0
1450
7
11
3
.8
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.1
.2
.0
.2
.8
.6
SLUDGE-SETT
TF1
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
29.0
62.0
1130.0
306.0
149.8
47.9
1.2
1100.0
7.2
9.7
1.9
1.0
4406.0
2098.0
120.0
TF2
22
24
22
7
25
68
1235
381
260
168
3
1100
7
33
.2
.0
.2
.7
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.1
.5
.0
.5
.0
AL
40.
6.
0.
2.
25.
88.
1647.
516.
683.
343.
35.
1000.
7.
1.
32.
6
7
0
0
0
0
9
9
8
9
0
OD
31
4
40
0
27
6040
2201
900
036000
4
4
0
FILE RECORD 107 DATA
TF1
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
27.0
56.0
1235.9
300.8
126.0
39.9
0.4
900.0
7.4
0.4
5108.0
2115.7
140.0
TF2
AL
7
0
26
FOR
.2
.0
.0
.6
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.2
.6
.0
CL2
31
26
1242
342
280
223
0
950
7
4971
1879
310
.2
.0
.0
.9
.1
.9
.1
.0
.5
.9
.8
.0
5/ 8/69
OD
CL2
DELETE
22
24
22
6
27
74
1342
341
262
114
4
980
7
37
.2
.0
.2
.4
.0
.0
.0
.9
.1
.1
.0
.0
.7
.0
40.
6.
0.
2.
26.
86.
1526.
430.
6
7
0
7
0
0
0
7
31
4
40
0
27
530.013631
216.
38.
1800.
7.
6.
2.
2.
32.
0
0
4659
975
030000
6
7
4
7
0
7
1
30
.2
.0
.0
.6
.0
.8
.3
.0
.0
.4
.2
.0
31
30
1276
315
217
32
1
1200
7
9328
3247
900
.2
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.5
.0
.6
.0
.0
.0
DAY 492 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
106 DATA FOft
AL 00
5/ 7/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-6PM
D.O.
TEMP - C
B005
TS
VTS
SS
vss
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6
34
310
.6
.0
.0
1347.0
503
222
104
0
1500
7
13
4
.9
.1
.0
.2
.0
.1
.3
.9
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
494
IN
PF
22.
24.
22.
30.
89.
1351.
436.
319.
155.
5.
1350.
7.
1.
2331.
1130.
40.
FILE
2
0
2
0
0
9
9
a
9
5
0
3
0
•
0
0
22.2
24.0
22.2
7.5
26.0
54.0
1176.1
342.0
339.9
275.8
2.0
990.0
7.5
3.9
1.4
94.0
RECORD
TF1
TF2
40.
6.
0.
2.
25.
47.
1372.
420.
6
7
0
2
0
0
0
9
31
4
40
0
27
.2
.0
.0
.7
.0
400.013908.0
198.
18.
0
0
5385
975
1350.028500
7.
2.
19.
5
0
0
108 DATA
AL
7
0
24
FOR
.2
.0
.0
.3
.9
.0
31
24
1284
352
260
123
•
1400
7
4J97
177*
240
.2
.0
.9
.8
.0
.8
.5
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
5/ 9/69
00
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6
32
206
1418
450
271
202
1
1350
7
12
3
.3
.0
.0
.9
.7
.9
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
SLUDGE-SETT
22.
24.
22.
28.
111.
1157.
367.
628.
168.
1.
1000.
7.
0.
6525.
3091.
200.
2
0
2
0
0
0
9
0
1
5
0
3
6
8
9
0
22.2
24.0
22.2
6.3
22.0
93.0
1253.9
401.8
222.1
150.1
3.5
1050.0
7,5
43.0
40.
6.
0.
1.
25.
86.
1443.
489.
442.
245.
37.
1700.
7.
2.
36.
*
7
0
9
0
0
0
0
31
4
40
0
25
117476
9
0
6176
975
040000
5
0
0
7
1
26
.2
.0
.0
.7
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.4
.1
.0
31
26
1252
350
299
137
0
1300
7
9
1
5544
1945
280
.2
.0
.0
.5
.9
.9
.5
.0
.4
.8
.8
.1
.9
.0
-------
B
w
H
S3
00
SHEET 28
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FNOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
O>
DAY 497 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
M-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-COO
6.2
34.0
168.0
1390.0
387.9
267.9
133.9
0.5
1100.0
8.2
15.7
4.2
SLUDGE-SETT
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
24.0
48.0
1245.8
258.8
118.1
70.1
0.1
950.0
7.9
10.1
1.4
0.7
4831.9
3415.3
250.0
109 DATA
AL
FOR 5/12/69
00 CL2
DELETE
22
24
22
6
19
62
.2
.0
.2
.5
.0
.0
1133.8
293.7
111
101
1
BOO
7
.9
.9
.2
.0
.8
40
6
0
3
20
160
•
»
•
•
*
•
6
7
0
0
0
0
31.
4.
40.
2.
21.
2
0
0
0
0
1549.9
489
544
298
50
•
•
•
•
9
1
1
0
1700.0
7
3
•
*
6
2
1835.
790.
75.
5000.
7.
2.
9
0
0
0
6
5
31
27
1252
313
202
139
0
1250
7
.2
.0
.8
.9
.0
.7
.1
.0
.6
17619.9
34
.0
DAY 5OO IN FILE RECORD
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT .
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
PF
6.6
3O.O
183.0
1506.0
517.9
405.8
166.0
0.8
2100.0
7.8
15.7
3.9
SLUDGE-SETT
TF1
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
25.0
40.0
1602.9
355.8
169.9
96.1
1.0
1100.0
7.4
TF2
22
24
22
7
23
298
1427
412
344
183
4
1300
7
.2
.0
.2
.4
.0
.0
.9
.8
.2
.9
.0
.0
.5
49
•
0
111 DATA
AL
40
6
0
2
22
1743
530
659
303
50
1900
7
•
»
•
•
•
»
•
•
•
•
•
*
12.
1.5
5151.9
2281.2
160.0
66
.0
2
2
71
•
•
•
6
7
0
8
0
0
0
7
8
5
27.
FOR
OD
31.
4.
40.
1.
23.
8191.
2895.
610.
019500.
4
3
8
7
0
7.
1.
61.
0
3735
940
.4
.0
5/15/69
CL2
2
0
0
3
0
8
8
0
0
3
5
0
31
61
1395
399
239
114
0
1200
7
9307
3137
890
.2
.0
.1
.0
.8
.1
.0
.0
.4
.8
.6
.0
DAY
FEED-CPU
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
499 IN
PF
6.6
32.0
227.0
1720. 8
623.8
365.9
198.0
1.0
18OO.O
IT. 6
4.5
SLUDGE-SETT
FILE RECORD 110 DATA
TF1 TF2 AL
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
21.0
66.0
1463.0
442.8
286.2
160.2
2.7
1600.0
1.9
3987.9
1795.7
1M.O
22.2
24.0
22.2
7.5
24.0
138.0
1443.0
412.9
244.1
142.2
3.0
1050.0
5.9
1.5
40.6
6.7
0.0
2.0
22.0
135.0
1478.8
422.9
30.0
850.0
1.5
FOR 5/14/69
00 CL2
31.2
4.0
4».0
1.1
23.0
3258.0
1319.8
160.0
9OOO.O
1.4
31.2
63.0
1406.0
360.0
324.0
158.0
3.5
1300.0
18799.8
53. •
49.8
63 .O
3*29.5
950.0
DAY 901 IN FILE RECORD 112 DATA FOR 5/16/69
PF
TF1
TF2
AL
OO
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-fT
RECY-6PM
0.0.
TEW - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
6.0
35. 0
191.0
166S.O
S3S.8
415.9
180.0
1.3
20SO.O
7.2
13.3
3.7
SLUDGE-SETT
22.2
24.0
22.2
28.0
41.0
1277.0
352.8
110.1
38.1
2.0
1OSO.O
7.3
0.6
4666.1
2139.8
30.0
22.2
24.0
22.2
7.4
25.0
314.0
1562.0
491.8
404.0
199.8
3.6
125O.O
7.4
67.0
40.6
6.7
0.0
1.8
24. O
122.0
1916.9
619.9
700.0
311.8
54.0
2300.O
7.4
1.0
57.0
31.2
4.0
4O.O
0.8
25.0
4539.7
1743.7
210.0
9OOO.O
7.3
1.0
72.0
31.2
72.O
1298.9
306.9
226.1
80.2
0.8
11OO.O
7.4
9.5
2.5
14824.2
4934.9
540.0
-------
SHEET 29
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAO-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 50* IN FILE RECORD 113 DATA FOR 5/19/69
VjJ
CO
PC
PI
a
PF TF1 TF2
DELETE
FEEO-GPM 22.2 22.2
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0
RECV-CPM 22.2 22.2
D.O. 7.4 7.6
TEMP - C 32.0 28.0 26.0
BODS
TS 1490.0 1213.0 1329.9
VTS 501.0 374.9 432.7
SS 481.8 310.0 422.0
VSS 217.8 159.8 209.9
SETT SOL 0.3 1.5 5.0
COLOR 1780.0 100O.O 1250.0
NITROGEN 9.0 7.6
PHOSPHOR 2.4 1.6
DO-CONT. 1.5
SS-CONT. 16713.8
VSS-CONT 7113.4
SET-BOO
SLUD6C-SETT 55.0
DAY 507 IN FILE RECORD 1
PF TF1 TF2
DELETE
FEEO-GPM 22.2 22.2
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0
RECY-GPM 22.2 22.2
0.0. 7.0 7.5
TEMP - C 33.0 28.0 25. 0
BODS 189.0 54.0 152.0
TS 1454.9 1350.8 1261.9
VTS 503.9 424.8 376.8
SS 203.8 205.9 205.9
VSS 131.8 137.9 123.8
SETT SOL 0.3 1.5 7.5
COLOR 1500.0 1250.0 1105.0
PH 7.0 7.3 7.4
NITROGEN 8.1
PHOSPHOR 2.3
DO-CONT. 1.1
SS-CONT. 18901.9
VSS-CONT 8967.0
SET-BOD 31.0
SLUDGE-SETT 80.0
AL OD CL2
40.6
6.7
0.0
1.8
25.0
1672.0
534.8
669.8
342.0
32.0
1700.0
1.6
15 DATA FOR 5/22/69
AL 00 CL2
40.6
6.7
0.0
1.7
25.0
135.0
1269.0
371.9
242.0
149.8
7.0
1150.0
7.4
0.8
2.0
1.0
60.0
DAY
506
PF
IN FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
114 DATA FOR 5/21/69
AL 00 CL2
DELETE
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET- BOD
6.
34.
207.
4
0
0
1524.9
487.
534.
199.
1.
1800.
6.
10.
2.
9
0
8
5
0
8
6
6
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
508
PF
22
24
22
27
68
•
•
•
•
•
2
0
2
0
0
1340.0
339
281
122
2
1300
7
1
10159
4585
340
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
IN FILE
0
9
0
5
0
2
5
9
1
0
22.
24.
22.
7.
23.
144.
1389.
386.
343.
151.
3.
1200.
7.
2.
2.
51.
2
0
2
5
0
0
9
9
9
9
5
0
4
2
2
0
RECORD
TF1
TF2
40
6
0
2
25
125
1416
406
42B
202
15
1100
7
1
74
.6
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.1
• 0
.0
.0
.4
.8
.0
116 DATA FOR 5/23/69
AL 00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SET1 SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
00-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
188.
1575.
530.
373.
161.
0.
1900.
6.
7.
1.
0
0
9
8
7
5
0
9
7
7
SLUDGE-SETT
22
24
22
22
64
1358
390
260
122
1
1100
7
1
10888
5095
310
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
2
0
2
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
6
0
22.
24.
22.
7.
28.
181.
1360.
379.
260.
147.
2.
1150.
7.
52.
2
0
2
4
0
0
0
8
0
9
5
0
5
0
40
6
0
0
23
83
1245
319
2
700
7
0
31
.6
.7
.0
.7
.0
.0
.8
.9
.5
.0
.5
.5
.0
-------
SHEET 30
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY
513 IN FILE
PF TF1
RECORD 117 DATA FOR
TF2 AL OD
5/28/69
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
0
35
194
1472
546
350
202
0
1700
7
7
2
.7
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.0
.6
.0
.4
.4
.9
SLUOGE-SETT
DAY
518
33.3
24.0
33.3
31.0
62.0
1260.9
394.9
256.0
176.0
0.4
1160.0
7.3
5.1
2.0
0.5
13348.0
5867.8
380.0
IN FILE
PF
TF1
33
.3
24.0
33
5
32
140
1517
546
431
249
5
1300
7
6
2
102
.3
.1
.0
.0
.9
.9
.8
.8
.7
.0
.4
.8
.9
.0
80.
7.
0.
6.
24.
141.
2247.
821.
1100.
468.
22.
2150.
7.
5.
47.
0
7
0
5
0
0
0
9
1
1
0
0
6
2
0
81
5
40
0
29
1027
539
31
.0
.2
.0
.5
.0
.8
.8
.0
1450.0
7
0
41
.4
.7
.0
RECORD 119 DATA FOR
7F2
AL
00
81
41
1184
381
130
1
500
7
7479
3157
105
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.0
.0
.5
.8
.2
.0
6/ 2/69
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
00-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
2
38
242
.6
.0
.0
1721.0
562
492
258
.9
.2
.1
1.8
1780
.0
7.0
3
6
.5
.7
33.3
24.0
33.3
34.0
110. O
1433.1
416.8
309.7
165.9
0.4
1250.0
7.2
2.0
4.7
0.5
33
24
33
5
35
170
1669
517
486
235
4
1400
7
.3
.0
.3
.5
.0
.0
.0
.8
.1
.8
.0
.0
.2
80.
7.
0.
5.
26.
184.
1580.
520.
538.
236.
12.
1180.
7.
5.
0
7
0
5
0
0
9
9
0
1
0
0
4
4
80
5
40
0
32
.0
.2
.0
.4
.0
80
67
.0
.0
1450.9
1696
844
110
4200
7
0
.1
.0
.0
.0
.3
.4
13428.0
SLUDGE-SETT
6289.6
355.0
142
.0
49.
0
67
.0
440
338
212
3
1100
7
2299
1127
145
.9
.1
.0
.5
.0
.4
.8
.8
.0
DAV
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-6PM
P.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
514 IN FILE RECORD 118 DATA
PF
1.0
36.0
164.0
1342.0
538.8
86.0
52.1
1.0
1250.0
7.1
8.5
2.0
SLUDGE-SETT
TF1
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
32.0
94.0
1283.8
393.8
212.0
119.9
0.8
1100.0
7.4
0.5
7534.1
3703.8
285.0
TF2
33.3
24.0
33.3
5.5
35.0
146.0
1349.0
380.9
300.2
136.0
6.0
850.0
7.2
101.0
AL
80.0
7.7
0.0
6.5
25.0
169.0
1655.1
510.9
584.1
266.0
14.0
1450.0
7.5
1.7
2.6
6.0
41.0
FOR 5/29/69
00
80. •
9.2
40.0
• .8
31.0
1354.0
659.9
71.0
2350.0
7.4
1.0
51.0
CL2
80.0
51,0
1204.9
330.0
16S.1
92.1
10.0
650.0
7.5
5*34.0
2777.5
235.0
DAY 520 IN FILE RECORD 120 DATA FOR */ 4/69
PF
TF1
TF2
AL
DO
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
00-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4.0
37.0
167.0
1861.8
698.7
682.0
130.0
3.0
2000.0
SLUDGE-SETT
33.3
24.0
33.3
32.0
88.0
1255.0
332.8
191.9
68.0
0.0
1900.0
7.0
0.6
16940.0
6315.2
400.0
33.3
24. O
33.3
4.2
32.0
122. O
1492.9
456.9
382.0
115.9
4.0
1950.0
7.2
60.0
8O.O
7.7
0.0
6.3
20.0
153. 0
1623.0
434.0
480.0
203.8
14.0
1700.0
7.7
6.4
72.0
81.0
5.2
40.0
1.0
27.0
932.0
382.0
60.0
1300.0
7.6
1.1
14.0
80.0
14.0
1207.1
274.0
72.0
24.1
0.0
900.0
7.6
503.8
220.0
25.0
-------
SHEET 31
CO
W
M
3
CO
DAY
FEED-6PM
DEPTH-FT
HECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
8005
TS
WTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
DU
rn
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
WSS-CONT
SET-BOO
521
PF
167.
147*.
519.
383.
159.
0.
1550.
7.
4.
IN FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
0
9
9
9
8
5
0
6
2
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
525
PF
2.
36.
201.
1604.
622.
256.
120.
0.
2000.
7.
10.
2.
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
73.0
1307.9
411.8
327.7
203. 8
0.5
1050.0
16683.9
6845.4
430.0
121 DATA
AL
FOR 6/ 5/69
00 CL2
DELETE
33
24
33
134
1539
541
454
201
4
1250
3
3
100
.3
.0
.3
.0
.9
.9
.1
.9
.0
.0
.9
.2
.0
IN FILE RECORD
4
0
0
0
0
0
2
5
0
1
3
9
SLUOGE-S6TT
TF1
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
32.0
92.0
1578.9
567.9
321.9
191.9
3.5
2000.0
7.5
3.9
3.0
0.6
19383.8
8125.7
680.0
TF2
80
7
0
160
1239
292
195
109
0
500
41
.0
.7
.0
.0
.9
.0
.9
.8
.3
.0
.0
123 DATA
AL
81
5
40
1124
511
60
2000
15
FOR
.0
.2
.0
.2
.9
.0
.0
.0
DELETE
80
15
1170
292
174
100
2
550
1529
700
100
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.0
6/ 9/69
OD
DELETE
33
24
33
6
31
143
1552
533
321
191
5
1600
7
122
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.8
.8
.9
.9
.5
.0
.4
.0
80
7
0
7
21
220
1608
499
473
205
13
1400
7
7
49
.0
.7
.0
.3
.0
.0
.8
.7
.9
.9
.0
.0
.8
.2
.0
81
5
40
1
29
1476
735
202
3600
7
1
23
.0
.2
.0
.3
.0
.1
.9
.0
.0
.6
.5
.0
CL2
DELETE
80
23
1212
368
83
37
0
800
7
5059
2449
940
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.8
.2
.0
.6
.8
.4
.0
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 522 IN FILE RECORD
PF
TF1
TF2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
3
3»
94
1376
460
2«4
100
1
1300
7
9
3
.7
.0
.0
.9
.0
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
527
33.3
24.0
33.3
34.0
41.0
1156.9
323.0
115.9
47.9
0.0
900.0
7.4
0.4
17539.9
7212.4
450.0
IN FILE
PF
TF1
33
24
33
4
34
74
1408
443
346
156
5
1400
7
69
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.2
.0
.0
.4
.0
RECORD
TF2
AL
DELETE
80
7
0
6
23
3B
1205
295
151
65
1
500
7
6
19
.0
.7
.0
.6
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.9
.5
.0
.6
.7
.0
124 DATA
AL
00
CL2
DELETE DELETI
81
5
40
3
30
1518
659
65
2950
7
3
55
FOR
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.2
.9
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
SO
55
1069
241
97
56
0
400
7
1
0
921
400
$0
•0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.1
.7
.0
.6
.2
.6
.9
.0
.0
6/11/49
00
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
8005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
167
1411
447
491
131
0
1650
7
10
3
.0
.0
.8
.9
.7
.5
.0
.1
.3
.2
SLUDGE-SETT
33.3
24.0
33.3
34.0
47.0
1514.0
491.9
538.0
177.8
7.0
1450.0
7.3
0.4
18598.0
7314.6
940.0
33
24
33
122
1552
494
589
201
7
1350
7
6
3
75
.3
.0
.3
.0
. 1
.9
.9
.9
.0
.0
.4
.8
.2
.0
80
7
0
7
25
130
1318
342
223
59
3
700
B
7
32
.0
.7
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.5
.0
.0
.1
.0
81
5
40
1
30
.0
.2
.0
.8
.0
81
21
.0
.0
1072.9
1674
780
80
3700
7
2
21
.1
.0
.0
.0
.6
.2
.0
220
.9
102.2
30
0
600
7
9023
4079
950
.2
.3
.0
.6
.7
.6
.0
-------
SHEET 32
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(HEAD-FHOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY
528 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
125 DATA
AL
FOR
00
6/12/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEEO-CPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O.
T6HP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
5
35
219
1567
535
614
213
8
1900
7
3
2
.0
.0
.0
.9
.7
.0
.9
.0
.0
.1
.4
.4
33.3
24.0
33.3
34.0
114.0
1584.9
499.8
570.0
216.0
11.0
1600.0
7.4
0.6
33
.3
24.0
33
5
35
127
1371
416
368
129
4
1250
7
.3
.6
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.9
.5
.0
.3
80.
7.
0.
6.
26.
177.
0
7
0
6
0
0
81,
5,
40,
1,
30,
.0
.2
.0
.3
.0
1263.1
311.
256.
64.
3.
650.
7.
1.
1.
6.
1
0
0
5
0
7
7
4
1
1423,
675.
60,
3500,
7,
1,
.9
,9
.0
.0
>6
.5
17650.1
SLUeGE-SETT
DAY
532
IN
PF
7589.5
920.0
81
.0
FILE RECORD
TF1
TF2
102.
0
127 DATA
AL
19.
FOR
.0
81
19
.0
.0
1062.0
247
99
27
0
400
8
1921
903
150
.8
.7
.7
.5
.0
.2
.9
.9
.0
6/16/69
OD
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEEO-6PM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
6
36
174
1259
489
296
245
0
1450
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.9
.6
.0
22.2
24.0
22.2
25.0
113.0
1323.0
471.0
207.8
175.7
0.5
1800.0
8.6
10.9
3.2
0.8
22
24
22
6
31
87
1225
437
230
185
5
1300
8
.2
.0
.2
.1
.0
.0
.1
.0
.1
.8
.0
.0
.1
80.
7.
0.
6.
23.
108.
1389.
435.
444.
270.
9.
1300.
8.
0
7
0
9
0
0
0
8
0
0
5
0
1
81,
5,
40,
1,
29,
.0
.2
.0
.2
.0
81
60
.0
.0
1058.9
1647,
885,
180,
3850,
7.
.9
,7
.0
.0
.8
331
135
91
0
700
7
.9
.8
.8
.2
.0
.7
12.3
2
.6
7.
2
1,
.3
14165.9
SLUDGE-SETT
6068.6
890.0
53
.0
72.
0
60,
.0
2962
1547
600
.0
.6
.0
DAY 529 IN FILE RECORD 126 DATA FOR A/13/69
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
PF
DELETE
6.5
34.0
58.0
3.5
TF1
DELETE
33.3
24.0
33.3
30.0
70.0
0.3
1300.0 2100.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
534 IN
PF
DELETE
5.6
37.0
201.0
1221.9
441.8
249.9
150.1
0.5
1250.0
8.5
18.9
4.6
8.9
0.7
350.0
TF2
33.3
24.0
33.3
6.7
32.0
170.0
6.5
2020.0
a. 8
134.0
AL
80.0
7.7
7.0
25.0
190.0
3.0
750.0
• .3
7.1
31.0
00
81.0
5.2
4«.0
3.1
20.0
2210.0
1056.1
25O.O
4800.0
8.1
3.5
CL2
81.0
8.0
FILE RECORD 128 DATA FOR 6/18/69
TF1
TF2
AL
00
CL2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
28.0
52.0
1004.9
287.9
130.0
59.8
0.5
900.0
8.2
1.0
22.2
24.0
22.2
5.3
32.0
140.0
12S9.9
391.9
375.9
212.0
10.0
900.0
7.8
13.4
4.1
80.0
7.7
0.0
7.2
24.0
126.0
1135.0
378.9
176.0
98.2
2.5
700.0
7.8
7.0
71.0
5.2
40.0
1.0
29.0
1538.0
795.8
2OO.O
3950.0
7.7
1.5
13976.1
SLUDGE-SETT
S598.8
890.0
78.0
62.0
25.0
81.0
25.0
929.8
277.9
61.9
41.8
O.O
400.0
8.0
9675.9
4683.1
910.0
-------
SHEET 33
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FMOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
w
M
H
UJ
Co
DAY
535 IN FILE RECORD
PF TFl TF2
129 DATA
AL
FOR
00
6/19/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECV-6PM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
22
24
.2
.0
22.2
6
36
241
.4
.0
.0
1459.9
450
468
104
20
1400
8
17
4
.8
.1
.0
.0
.0
.4
.7
.3
34
111
1383
3B6
410
120
0
1700
8
0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.1
.2
.8
.0
.0
.6
22.2
24.0
22.2
7.0
34.0
90.0
1689.9
539.9
754.0
280.1
13.0
2150.0
8.1
80.
7.
0.
7.
24.
159.
0
7
0
4
0
0
81.
5.
40.
1.
30.
0
2
0
1
0
1130.0
403.
221.
27.
2.
550.
7.
1.
2.
6.
9
8
7
5
0
9
2
9
4
877.
408.
120.
2300.
8.
1.
9
0
0
0
0
3
15073.8
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
539
5755
910
.1
.0
189.0
IN FILE RECORD
PF
TFl
TF2
33.
0
131 DATA
AL
37.
FOR
OD
0
81
37
944
178
49
19
0
350
7
2
2
.0
.0
.9
.9
.7
.8
.5
.0
.9
.4
.6
4216.0
2063
800
.7
.0
6/23/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
172
.0
1239.0
430
361
151
0
1800
.8
.9
.9
.7
.0
SLUDGE-SETT
22
24
22
28
79
1044
308
163
54
0
1200
8
11
2
1
17622
6481
940
.2
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.5
.0
.4
.3
.4
.3
.0
.3
.0
22.2
24.0
22.2
162.0
1626.8
608.9
777.8
281.9
8.0
2500.0
8.2
127.0
80.
7.
0.
7.
22.
144.
1251.
326.
263.
71.
1.
700.
a.
6.
27.
0
7
0
4
0
0
9
8
9
6
5
0
0
9
0
81.
5.
40.
4.
27.
1647.
773.
160.
3000.
7.
4.
95.
0
2
0
5
0
9
8
0
0
9
8
0
81
95
1334
447
427
209
15
1100
8
.0
.0
.9
.8
.8
.9
.0
.0
.1
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-fT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
536
PF
6
36
251
•
»
•
IN FILE RECORD 130 DATA
TFl TF2 AL
DELETE DELETE
22.2 22.2 80.0
24.0 24.0 7.7
22.2 22.2 0.0
1
0
0
1930.0
728
732
389
5
2000
8
IB
5
»
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
9
1
9
0
0
4
9
2
31.
55.
1295.
415.
180.
127.
0.
800.
8.
0.
0
0
0
8
0
8
5
0
0
6
7.1
34.0
201.0
1629.0
575.0
435.7
287.7
3.0
1550.0
8.5
7.3
25.0
33.0
1077.1
304.9
124.2
74.1
1.0
450.0
8.2
7.0
FOR
OO
81.
5.
40.
0.
29.
A/20/69
CL2
0 81.0
2
0
5
0
21
.0
1154.0
1535.
791.
180.
3600.
T.
0.
9
7
0
0
•
7
17239.9
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
541
7049.
940.
IN FILE
PF
4
0
19*. 0
42.0
RECORD 132 DATA
TFl
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
00-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
6
37
197
1385
523
432
174
0
2200
8
14
3
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
0
0
0
9
1
2
5
0
8
7
8
SLUDGE-SETT
22.
24.
22.
32.
1489.
475.
230.
123.
0.
2100.
8.
0.
22362.
8493.
890.
2
0
2
0
8
8
1
8
0
0
6
4
0
1
0
TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
6.3
34.0
88.0
1650.0
591.8
288.0
140.0
2.0
1750.0
8.6
14.5
3.7
322.0
AL
DELETE
80.0
7.7
0.0
7.6
24.0
34.0
1069.0
287.9
164.1
90.0
0.5
21.
FOR
OD
0
3*9
48
0
300
8
3020
158*
428
.0
.2
.5
.0
.1
.0
.7
.0
»/25/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
81.
5.
40.
1.
29.
9471.
4317.
845.
500.021000.
8.6
7.5
23.0
7.
1.
33.
0
2
0
2
0
7
2
0
0
9
7
0
81
33
1186
335
203
101
2
3800
8
10816
5193
660
.0
.0
.0
.8
.8
.9
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
-------
to
SB
w
w
H
u>
SHEET 34
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 542 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
133 DATA FOR 6/26/69
AL
OD
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEEO-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-6PM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
6
39
280
1534
588
354
108
1
2200
7
11
3
.2
.0
.0
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
.8
.4
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
546
22.2
24.0
22.2
34.0
81.0
1396.9
490.7
155.9
52.1
0.0
1500.0
7.5
0.5
17532.0
6797.1
870.0
22
.2
24.0
22
7
36
193
1558
568
321
144
3
1900
7
9
2
131
.2
.5
.0
.0
.0
.8
.9
.0
.0
.0
.7
.8
.1
.0
IN FILE RECORD
PF
TF1
TF2
80.
7.
7.
27.
66.
1096.
291.
45.
1.
700.
8.
7.
38.
0
7
1
0
0
0
9
7
0
81.
5.
40.
0.
33.
6882.
3377.
840.
016400.
0
7
0
135 DATA
AL
7.
1.
22.
FOR
0
2
0
9
0
0
6
0
0
8
3
0
81
22
1105
312
36
23
1
850
7
9759
4771
930
.0
.0
.9
.6
.0
.8
.5
.0
.8
.8
.5
.0
6/30/69
OD
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4
40
306
.8
.0
.0
SLUDGE-SETT
22.2
24.0
22.2
33.0
107.0
1130.0
355.9
199.8
104.0
0.7
1650.0
7.9
22.4
6.B
0.5
870.0
22
24
22
5
36
181
4
1950
7
21
4
169
.2
.0
.2
.4
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.4
.9
.0
40.
29.
0
0
24.
0
CL2
DELETE
24
.0
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-6PM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
543 IN FILE RECORD 134 DATA
PF
5.7
37.0
261.0
1614.0
521.9
244.1
70.1
0.5
2050.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
TF1
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
34.0
102.0
1398.9
353.7
167.8
29.8
0.5
1700.0
6.8
0.4
18103.9
7221.6
940.0
TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
6.1
37.0
226.0
1539.0
468.7
258.1
72.0
2.0
1900.0
7.2
180.0
AL
DELETE
80.0
7.7
0.0
7.5
29.0
34.0
1099.0
239.0
235.9
155.9
0.5
FOR 6/27/69
00
CL2
DELETE DELETE
81.0
5.2
40.0
0.9
33.0
7872.0
372J.4
830.0
6 OO. 01 5000.0
7.9
6.9
30.0
7.5
1.1
21.0
548 IN FILE RECORD 136 DATA FOR
PF
TF1
TF2
AL
OD
81.0
21.0
1138.0
214.0
31.7
1.5
6500.0
7.6
12836.0
9735.1
980.0
7/ 2/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6.2
35.0
261.0
1725.0
550.9
248.1
131.8
1.5
Z 000.0
6.9
23.9
9.1
SLUDGE-SETT
22.2
24. O
22.2
31.0
87.0
1361.9
407.9
10.0
2.1
0.7
1300.0
7.3
0.6
26701.9
9975.8
310.0
22.2
24.0
22.2
6.8
34.0
152.0
5230.0
119.9
2.0
1400.0
7.4
13.7
3.1
139.0
68.0
22.0
12.0
12.0
-------
SHEET 35
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAfVFHQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
KJ
-F-
vn
EC
M
OJ
Ln
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD 5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
549 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
22.2 22.2
24.0 24.0
22.2 22.2
6.0 6.4
37
204
1540
513
422
184
1
1650
6
17
5
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.0
.3
.0
.7
.7
.4
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
574
30.0
65.0
1450.9
413.9
433.9
176.0
3.5
1150.0
7.2
0.5
17142.0
6949.3
905.0
33
102
1479
498
421
202
5
1300
7
98
.0
.0
.0
.8
.7
.0
.0
.0
.2
.0
IN FILE RECORD
PF
TF1
TF2
137 OATA
AL
DELETE
19.
14.
0
0
139 DATA
AL
FOR 7/ 3/69
00 CL2
DELETE DELETE
7.
3.
1.
12.
FOR
00
7
9
6
0
12
.0
7/28/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
2
36
163
1205
486
205
45
0
1620
8
25
.5
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.7
.0
22.2
24.0
22.2
31.0
134.0
587.0
777.8
353.9
2.5
.017800.0
.8
.2
3.3
SLUDGE-SETT
8.0
16.5
3.2
0.7
1596.0
687.7
200.0
22
24
22
6
29
73
1311
444
351
198
3
1450
7
40
.2
.0
.2
.9
.0
.0
.9
.8
.8
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
40.
5.
7.
26.
63.
1177.
355.
326.
140.
9.
980.
8.
6.
38.
0
5
5
0
0
9
9
2
0
5
0
0
3
0
40.
5.
40.
0.
29.
1552.
738.
120.
3850.
7.
1.
10.
5
2
0
9
0
1
1
0
0
8
0
0
40
10
964
278
99
59
0
420
7
55065
30456
990
.5
.0
.9
.8
.7
.8
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.0
DAY 569 IN
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
PF
DELETE
229.0
1139.9
391.0
137.0
20.5
FILE RECORD 138 DATA FOR 7/23/69
TF1
DELETE
111.0
1056.9
349.8
251.7
68.0
727.8
265.7
TF2
DELETE
123.0
1154.0
402.9
329.8
114.1
56.0
AL OO CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
13.0 27.0
774.9 739.8
176.9 ISA. 8
2219.8
985.8
3197.9
14T3.9
7.0 27.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 576 IN FILE RECORD 140 DATA FOR 7/307*9
PF TF1 TF2 AL OO CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
1
36
151
1221
447
332
146
0
1750
8
31
4
.6
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.1
.7
.0
.9
.4
.3
SLUDGE-SETT
22
24
22
32
80
1118
384
346
162
1
1300
8
0
639
266
20
.2
.0
.2
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.0
.9
.0
.3
.6
.9
.0
.0
22.2
24.0
22.2
6.8
29.0
91.0
1148.9
407.0
229.7
101.9
5.5
1100. 0
7.9
12.0
5.6
45.0
DELETE DELETE DELETE
40
5
6
24
26
879
243
43
29
0
380
8
6
22
.0
.5
.5
.0
.0
.9
.0
.9
.9
.0
.0
.0
.5
.0
40
5
40
0
29
1306
612
140
3980
7
0
26
.5
.2
.0
.6
.0
.1
.0
.0
.0
.6
.6
.0
40
26
952
283
131
55
0
980
7
8054
3705
975
.5
.0
.9
.8
.8
.8
.6
.0
.8
.2
.7
.0
-------
CO
EC
M
W
H
Co
SHEET 36
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(NEAD-FHQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
577 IN
PF
1
39
198
1147
499
133
21
0
1680
a
40
3
.2
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.3
.0
.8
.2
.3
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
581
IN
PF
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
160
1230
335
447
111
18
800
22
.0
.9
.9
.9
.9
.0
.0
.7
FILE RECORD 141 DATA
TF1 TF2 AL
22.
24.
22.
33.
138.
1287.
544.
5343.
2.
1820.
8.
0.
411.
221.
20.
FILE
2
0
2
0
0
0
9
9
5
0
2
7
9
8
0
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
6.1
30.0
136.0
2.5
1620.0
7.9
58.0
FOR
OD
7/31/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
40.
5.
6.
24.
40.
1027.
256.
101.
13.
0.
240.
6.
14.
6.
24.
0
5
6
0
0
9
8
0
1
1
40
5
40
1
30
.5
.2
.0
.0
.0
40
128
.5
.0
1374.0
8103.9
3635
670
019100
4
0
5
0
RECORD 143 DATA
TF1
DELETE
22.
24.
22.
77.
347.
113.
1.
1100.
20.
14.
586.
222.
2
0
2
0
9
7
0
0
8
5
2
1
TF2
DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
136.0
1130.9
308.9
136.1
4.0
700.0
68.0
AL
40.
5.
0
5
7
1
128
FOR
.4
.0
.0
.2
.0
.0
519
484
218
0
1480
7
6997
2857
20
.9
.0
.1
.0
.0
.6
.9
.2
.0
8/ 4/69
OD
40
5
40
.5
.2
.0
CL2
40
.5
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 578 IN FILE RECORD 142 DATA FOR 8/ 1/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL 00 CL2
FEED-GPM
DEPTM-FT
RECY-6PM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
1
38
200
1224
525
223
191
0
1880
7
5
1
.8
.0
.0
.9
.0
.9
.9
.0
.0
.8
.6
.8
SLUDGE-SETT
22
24
22
34
71
1051
400
155
144
0
1380
7
0
300
254
15
.2
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.3
.0
.1
.7
.2
.1
.0
DELETE DELETE DELETE
22.2
24.0
22.2
6.4
30.0
65.0
1068.1
441.1
220.0
162.0
1.3
1180.0
7.6
62.0
40
5
6
25
96
1687
566
733
347
16
1880
7
7
12
.0
.5
.9
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.8
.5
.0
.9
.4
.0
40
5
40
3
30
2058
1064
155
50OO
T
3
13
.5
.2
.0
.0
.0
.1
.0
.0
.0
.6
.1
.0
40
13
916
323
90
0
980
7
0
1
9*30
42*7
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.4
.1
.9
940.0
DAY 583 IN FILE RECORD 144 DATA FOR 8/ 6/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL DO CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM 22.2 22.2 40.0 40.5 40.5
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0 5.5 5.2
RECY-GPM 22.2 22.2 4O.O
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
3
35
201
1215
393
325
195
0
1800
7
8
3
.8
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.5
.0
.3
.1
.6
SLUDGE-SETT
31
105
.0
.0
7
29
70
.5
.0
.0
1278.0
429
444
275
1
1900
7
1
397
216
5
.9
.0
.8
.0
.0
.3
.5
.9
.0
.0
2
1800
7
0
4
59
.0
.0
.4
.3
.4
.0
6
25
7
930
282
180
111
0
400
8
7
4
.4
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.9
.5
.0
.0
.1
.0
3
29
.2
.0
1709.9
835
120
4100
7
3
8
.7
.0
.0
.6
.2
.0
8.O
971.9
248.0
193.7
126.0
2.0
«00.0
7.8
9209.9
4247.6
930.0
-------
SHEET 37
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
IMEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
ro
4>
-o
w
H
DAY
584
PF
IN
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
145 DATA
AL
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOO 5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
0.
36.
201.
1280.
442.
429.
84.
0.
1350.
7.
0.
2.
7
0
0
0
0
9
1
5
0
6
3
4
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
588
PF
IN
22
24
22
31
109
1160
404
155
0
1200
7
1
604
132
10
.2
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.5
.0
.3
.3
.2
.0
.0
22
24
22
5
28
57
1088
313
319
1
950
7
47
.2
.0
.2
.6
.0
.0
.8
.8
.8
.5
.0
.7
.0
FILE RECORD
TF1
TF2
40
5
7
25
13
988
231
296
70
0
450
8
0
2
7
18
.0
.5
.4
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.1
.5
.0
.2
.8
.4
.5
.0
147 DATA
AL
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
163.
1389.
577.
405.
168.
4.
1280.
6.
3.
0
0
9
8
1
0
0
9
2
SLUDGE-SETT
22
24
22
29
99
1271
439
411
216
1
1150
7
3
5
3
351
183
5
.2
.0
.2
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.0
.0
.0
.5
.3
.0
.2
.8
.9
.0
22
24
22
82
1086
406
299
155
0
1150
7
64
.2
.0
.2
.0
.8
.9
.9
.9
.6
.0
.5
.0
40
5
8
22
22
922
231
260
121
1
600
7
8
6
.0
.5
.1
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.7
.1
.0
.6
.5
.0
FOR 8/ 7/69
00 CL2
DELETE
40
5
40
4
28
1737
790
125
3550
7
4
10
FOR
.5
.2
.0
.1
.0
.9
.0
.0
.0
.7
.2
.0
DELETE
40.5
10.0
1049.0
381.9
149.8
0.5
450.0
7.8
4067.9
1901.7
350.0
8/11/69
OD
DELETE
40
5
40
4
26
1468
724
95
3300
8
4
33
.5
.2
.0
.2
.0
.2
. 1
.0
.0
.0
.4
.0
CL2
DELETE
40.5
33.0
914.0
246.7
126.0
73.8
0.2
680.0
7.9
3781.7
1843.5
300.0
DAY
585 IN
PF
FILE RECORD 146 DATA
TF1 TF2 AL
FOR • / 8/69
00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
00-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
2
35
274
1567
755
504
312
0
2100
8
0
2
.2
.0
.0
.0
.9
.1
.1
.5
.0
.9
.2
.7
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
595
IN
PF
22.
24.
22.
33.
121.
1253.
481.
362.
250.
0.
1500.
7.
1.
287.
202.
0.
FILE
2
0
2
0
O
0
9
2
2
5
0
5
e
7
0
0
22
24
22
6
30
71
1224
471
306
205
1
1500
7
80
.2
.0
.2
.4
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.9
.5
.0
.8
.0
40
5
7
26
15
1072
415
83
0
500
8
7
9
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.9
.5
.0
.1
.4
.0
RECORD 148 DATA
TF1
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
229
1199
411
256
129
3
1280
7
1
3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.0
.4
.6
.0
SLUDGE-SETT
22.
24.
22.
35.
205.
1159.
462.
249.
150.
0.
1250.
7.
0.
3.
0.
326.
165.
5.
2
0
2
0
0
9
9
9
1
•5
0
5
6
3
5
2
9
0
TF2
AL
DELETE
22
24
22
5
34
49
996
297
179
127
1
900
7
51
.2
.0
.2
.5
.0
.0
.0
.9
.7
.8
.5
.0
.7
.0
40
5
6
29
33
1009
270
155
101
3
700
7
6
15
.0
.5
.4
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.0
.0
.9
.5
.0
40
5
40
4
29
953
535
70
2300
7
4
11
FOR
.5
.2
.0
.2
.0
.9
.8
.0
.0
.8
.3
.6
40.*
11.0
1083.9
485.9
131.8
111.9
0.5
500.0
7.9
0.8
3.8
7203.9
3635.0
920.0
a/18/69
00
DELETE
40
5
40
1
32
1676
873
1
3600
7
1
10
.5
.2
.0
.8
.0
.0
.8
.0
.0
.5
.8
.0
CL2
DELETE
40.5
10.0
906.0
228.0
115.9
71.7
0.0
530.0
6.8
404.0
248.0
30.0
-------
ffi
w
w
H
OJ
oo
SHEET 38
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 597 IN
PF
FILE
TF1
RECORD
TF2
149 DATA
AL
FOR
OD
8/20/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
3
36
212
1431
555
635
294
10
1700
7
4
2
.7
.0
.0
.8
.8
.9
.1
.0
.0
.7
.2
.6
22.2
24.0
22.2
32.0
83.0
1212.9
382.9
4931.9
1451.9
2.5
900.0
7.7
0.2
346.0
22
24
22
6
29
47
1082
324
346
126
3
600
7
0
2
.2
.0
.2
.5
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.0
.5
.0
.8
.6
.1
40.
5.
6.
27.
12.
875.
216.
93.
56.
0.
350.
8.
6.
0
5
8
0
0
0
0
9
1
5
0
3
8
40.
5.
40.
2.
30.
2308.
5
2
0
3
0
0
1064.0
140.
4600.
8.
2.
o
0
2
3
40
7
825
162
36
24
0
250
8
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.1
.5
.0
.2
9025.8
140.0
SLOOGE-SETT
DAY
599
IN
PF
90.0
FILE
TF1
26
.0
RECORD
TF2
10.
0
151 DATA
AL
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD 5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-80D
1
37
204
1170
446
436
216
1350
8
1
3
.2
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.0
.0
.1
.6
.4
SLUDGE-SETT
22.2
24.0
22.2
32.0
105.0
1080.9
394.9
275.8
137.9
1050.0
7.6
0.8
96.1
60.1
5.0
22
24
22
5
28
44
1025
312
270
146
900
7
34
.2
.0
.2
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.1
.0
.7
.0
40.
5.
8.
22.
IB.
894.
217.
108.
59.
280.
8.
8.
15.
0
5
2
0
0
0
9
0
8
0
1
4
0
7.
FOR
OD
0
3461
850
.4
.0
8/22/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
40.
5.
40.
2.
27.
4565.
1805.
9000.
7.
2.
11.
5
2
0
7
0
7
7
0
7
7
0
40
11
829
181
89
59
280
7
0
1
10548
4043
930
.5
.0
.0
.9
.7
.8
.0
.9
.1
.9
.0
.0
.0
DAY
FEEDH5PM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
598 IN FILE RECORD 130 DATA
PF
0.2
37.0
183.0
1234.9
527.9
359.8
225.8
3.0
1200.0
7.6
2.1
2.1
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
TF1
22.2
24.0
22.2
32.0
78.0
1096.0
351.0
99.7
1.0
1000.0
7.6
0.6
469.9
279.8
12.0
TF2
22.2
24.0
22.2
5.6
27.0
49.0
1199.9
384.9
252.0
180.0
3.0
1100.0
7.6
26.0
602 IN FILE RECORD
PF
TF1
TF2
AL
DELETE
40.0
5.5
7.7
23.0
22.0
979.0
259.9
160.2
106.1
2.5
FOR 8
OD
DELETE
40.5
5.2
40.0
3.7
28.0
5515.7
2159.4
430.0
500.011500.0
7.8
0.3
2.0
7.9
9.0
7.7
3. •
8.0
/21/69
CL2
DELETE
40.5
8.0
910.9
218.8
82.0
0.2
380.0
8.1
1159.9
479.9
10.0
152 DATA FOR 8/25/69
AL
OD
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOO5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
4.7
37.0
197.0
1266.9
624.9
504.1
280.1
3.0
1550.0
8.2
0.4
2.5
SLUDGE-SETT
22.2
24.0
22.2
33.0
88.0
1237.0
502.8
43.9
22.2
24.0
22.2
6.6
29.0
51.0
1260.9
485.9
552.0
40.0
5.5
7.7
23.0
18.0
886.9
294.9
179.7
259.9 139.7
2.0
1050.0
7.8
1.4
2.4
0.3
7340.0
2415.6
100.0
6.0
1050.0
7.7
31.0
1.5
40.5
5.2
40.0
2.2
29.0
9903.8
3983.3
590.0
300.010800.0
8.1
7.4
10.0
7.6
2.2
6.0
CL2
DELETE
40.5
6.0
797.1
250.0
96.1
0.2
250.0
7.9
4000.2
1880.1
295.0
-------
SHf-F.T 39
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-EWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
ro
.£-
-o
LTl
<£
w
w
H
LO
DAY 605 IN FILE RECORD 153 DATA FOR 8/28/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL 00 CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETI
FEEO-GPM ?2.2 22. 2
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0
RECY-GPM 22.2 22.2
D.O. 1.0 8.3
TEMP - C 37.0 33.0 28.0
B005 177.0 100.0 72.0
TS 1270.1 1274.8 1385.9
VTS 392.9 427.9 443.7
SS 459.8 492.2 638.1
VSS 306.0 236.1 335.9
SETT SOL 9.0
COLOR 1400.0 1450.0 1050.0
PH 7.6 7.3 7.5
NITROGEN 0.0 0.1
PHOSPHOR 1.5 2.3
DO-CONT. 0.8
SS-CONT .
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD 34.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 623 IN FILE RECORD 155 DATA FOR 9/15/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD 5
TS
V fS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
.SF T-HOD
SLUDGE-SF
5
34
264
1473
526
314
72
0
1880
'/
8
0
TT
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.0
.5
.0
.5
.9
.7
14
24
74
30
43
1192
413
186
39
0
1200
7
0
0
0
11521
5904
900
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.1
.9
.5
.0
.7
.4
.7
.7
.9
.9
.0
66
24
0
6
28
52
1076
252
100
0
580
7
42
.7
.0
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.4
.0
.9
.0
32
7
2
24
214
1968
672
997
231
80
3000
7
1
31
.0
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.9
.9
.0
.0
.8
.3
.0
66.
8.
30.
1.
30.
20.
2185.
1056.
175.
5500.
8.
1.
18.
7
5
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
1
0
66.7
18.0
1015.0
218.0
106.2
0.0
480.0
8.0
2936.0
1482. 1
310.0
DAY 606 IN FILE RECORD 154 DATA FOR 8/29/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL 00 CL 2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM 22.2 22.2
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0
RECY-GPM 22.2 22.2
D.O. 5.2 6.1
TEMP - C 35.0 32.0 28.0
BOD5 230.0 140.0 50.0
TS 1234.8 1213.9 1199.9
VTS 392.8 357.8 312.9
SS 256.0 212.0 214.2
VSS 86.0 50.0 92.1
SETT SOL 1.5 3.0 3.0
COLOR 1800.0 1450.0 1250.0
PH 8.3 7.8 7.7
NITROGEN 11.3 2.4
PHOSPHOR 2.3 2.8
DO-CONT. 0.2
SS-CONT. 1375.7
VSS-CONT 603.8
SET-BOO 32.0
SLUDGE-SETT 30.0
DAY 625 IN FILE RECORD 156 DATA FOR 9/17/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL OD CL2
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
1
36
264
1445
682
411
192
0
1650
7
4
.9
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.2
.7
.0
.4
.6
SLUDGE-SETT
DEL
14
24
74
31
52
1159
383
230
162
0
1300
7
0
13724
6641
950
ETE
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.1
.0
. 1
.0
.5
.6
.0
.0
.0
DELETE DELETE
66.
24.
0.
6.
29.
24.
971.
267.
73.
0.
420.
7.
1.
0.
14.
7
0
0
9
0
0
9
0
8
2
0
7
2
5
0
32
7
3
25
36
1581
624
556
396
120
1750
7
2
26
.0
.7
.2
.0
.0
.1
.8
.0
.1
.0
.0
.6
.8
.0
66
8
30
1
29
15
2407
1383
210
4500
7
1
11
.7
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.7
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
66.7
11.0
975.9
300.8
97.9
0.0
400.0
7.6
7590.0
3921.7
950.0
-------
C/i
W
w
M
H
SHEET 40
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 626 IN FILE RECORD 157 DATA FOR
PF TF1 TF2 AL OD
9/18/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FESO-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5
37
213
1184
427
344
144
1
1780
8
21
0
.6
.0
.0
.9
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.4
.6
.8
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
630
14.8
24.0
74.0
27.0
47.0
1078.0
313.9
252.0
122.0
1.5
1260.0
7.7
0.7
12372.1
5271.7
960.0
66
24
0
7
27
41
945
219
132
61
2
530
7
21
.7
.0
.0
.3
.0
.0
.1
.0
.1
.9
.0
.0
.8
.0
32.
7.
0
7
3.0
23.0
65.
1167.
347.
294.
166.
30.
980.
7.
3.
20.
0
9
8
1
0
0
0
8
0
0
IN FILE RECORD 159 DATA
PF
TF1
TF2
AL
66.
8.
30.
1.
28.
13.
2230.
1103.
200.
5000.
7.
1.
19.
FOR
00
7
5
0
2
0
0
2
9
0
0
6
2
0
66
19
994
286
130
63
1
530
7
1607
808
130
.7
.0
.0
.9
.0
.7
.5
.0
.7
.9
.0
.0
9/22/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6
38
194
1228
454
204
122
0
1370
7
0
0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.9
.1
.0
.2
.0
.3
.4
.9
14.8
24.0
74.0
31.0
36.0
926.0
266.9
198.0
51.8
0.1
680.0
7.3
1.3
1.0
0.7
66
24
0
6
27
35
908
231
.7
.0
.0
.8
.0
.0
.9
.8
115.9
2
420
8
.0
.0
.0
32.
7.
4.
23.
77.
2667.
1124.
1823.
913.
72.
4250.
7.
4.
0
7
5
0
0
0
9
7
8
0
0
5
5
66.
8.
30.
1.
29.
20.
1307.
917.
100.
3500.
7.
1.
7
5
0
2
0
0
9
9
0
0
3
0
13280.0
SLUDGE-SETT
6199.1
950.0
63
.0
45.
0
18.
0
66
18
850
207
70
0
340
7
9069
4561
970
.7
.0
.9
.8
.1
.1
.0
.5
.8
.2
.0
DAY
627
PF
IN FILE RECORD 158 DATA
TF1 TF2 AL
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6.
33.
209.
1369.
558.
532.
295.
1.
1870.
•
23.
0.
0
0
0
0
8
2
9
0
0
0
8
14.
24.
74.
25.
43.
1085.
368.
248.
150.
0.
1000.
0.
12178.
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
632
PF
5823.
950.
IN FILE
8
0
0
0
0
0
9
1
1
2
0
5
0
5
0
66.7
24.0
0.0
7.2
25.0
42.0
964.9
345.8
199.8
151.9
1.5
480.0
25.0
RECORD
TF1
TF2
32.0
7.7
4.3
22.0
114.0
1488.9
591.8
771.7
517.8
60.0
1820.0
0.7
0.7
4.2
16.0
160 DATA
AL
FOR 9/19/69
00 CL2
DELETE DELETE
66.7
8.5
30.0
1.0
27.0
21.0
829.7
541.9
2100.0
1.1
20.0
66.7
20.0
955.9
463.8
260.0
0.5
470.0
7-9
• 1
5.5
0.1
2743.8
1443.5
2SO.O
FOR 9/24/69
OD
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
169.
1027.
344.
244.
114.
3.
1160.
8.
27.
1.
0
9
9
1
1
0
0
7
2
2
SLUDGE-SETT
14.
24.
74.
20.
850.
8
0
0
0
0
290.0
151.
127.
9
8
0.2
550.
7.
14572.
6720.
920.
0
4
1
6
0
66.7
24.0
0.0
25.0
822.9
385.8
130.0
1.5
320.0
8.1
0.5
0.7
12.0
32.0
7.7
302.0
3111.9
1299.8
2435.9
1151.6
90.0
4770.0
7.6
27.0
66.7
8.5
30.0
24.0
2442.0
1225.6
200.0
6500.0
7.3
18.0
66.7
18.0
830.0
263.0
109.8
0.5
300.0
7.4
10591.7
5305.3
930.0
-------
SHEET 41
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
to
DAY 633 IN FILE RECORD 161 DATA FOR 9/25/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL 00 CL2
w
H
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
8005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6.
37.
244.
1418.
459.
289.
151.
1.
1600.
8.
14.
2.
0
0
0
9
8
9
9
0
0
3
9
5
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
637
PF
14
24
74
30
52
1146
264
83
67
0
590
7
0
20907
9515
900
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.7
.1
.0
.9
.6
.9
.1
.0
66.7
24.0
0.0
7.5
26.0
31.0
968.0
216.0
86.0
0.5
450.0
8.0
32
7
3
23
261
1996
727
1202
567
60
4300
7
2
2
3
.0
.7
.3
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.8
.0
.0
.6
.6
.3
.0
66
8
30
1
28
33
2619
1309
250
5100
7
1
.7
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.7
.0
.0
.4
.0
66
25
953
230
92
56
0
320
7
14545
31.0
37
.0
IN FILE RECORD 163 DATA
TF1
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
7.
35.
229.
1432.
572.
238.
70.
0.
1720.
7.
5.
3.
5
0
0
0
9
0
1
5
0
8
5
1
SLUDGE-SETT
14
24
74
27
109
1351
445
275
119
1
1780
7
2
1
0
15336
7091
970
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.5
.0
.6
.9
.5
.7
.0
.3
.0
TF2
DELETE
66.7
24.0
0.0
6.5
25.0
154.0
1497.9
553.9
509.9
245.9
1.0
1690.0
7.6
70.0
AL
25
FOR
.0
7197
950
.7
.0
.9
.8
.1
.1
.2
.0
.5
.9
.3
.0
9/29/69
OD
DELETE
32
7
4
21
119
1568
583
624
303
30
1640
7
4
91
.0
.7
.5
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.9
.0
.0
.6
.6
.0
66
8
30
0
27
116
1149
585
60
2500
7
0
113
.7
.5
.0
.7
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.0
.3
.8
.0
CL2
DELETE
66
113
1523
512
507
231
3
1640
7
.7
.0
.8
.9
.8
.9
.5
.0
.4
DAY
634
PF
IN
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
162 DATA
AL
FOR
00
9/26/69
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
5.
38.
197.
1467.
547.
324.
2.
1490.
8.
20.
2.
7
0
0
8
8
0
0
0
3
3
9
14
24
74
28
28
984
317
133
0
650
7
0
17218
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
639
PF
IN
8089
970
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.2
.0
.6
.4
.0
.0
.0
66
24
0
6
26
108
930
295
47
0
300
8
10
.7
.0
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.1
.0
.1
.0
FILE RECORD
TF1
TF2
32.
7.
3.
22.
62.
1034.
303.
169.
8.
450.
7.
4.
27.
0
7
6
0
0
8
9
9
0
0
2
4
0
164 DATA
AL
66.
8.
30.
1.
27.
19.
2815.
1619.
240.
620.
7.
1.
16.
FOR
00
7
5
0
3
0
0
8
6
0
0
1
1
0
66.7
16.0
949.0
250.0
141.9
97.9
0.2
320.0
7.6
0.8
0.8
12966.0
6503.7
»90.0
10/ 1/69
CL2
DELETE DELETE
FEED-GPH
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPH
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6.
37.
242.
1500.
613.
106.
54.
0.
810.
8.
23.
2.
3
0
0
8
8
2
0
0
0
1
1
5
SLUDGE-SETT
14
24
74
30
73
1315
479
118
0
710
8
0
7898
4003
540
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.1
.5
.0
.2
.5
.2
.6
.0
66
24
0
3
25
40
1206
406
137
2
510
7
1
0
29
.7
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.0
.0
.5
.0
.6
.0
32.
7.
2.
23.
251.
2032.
840.
1004.
559.
60.
2100.
7.
1.
45.
0
7
0
0
0
0
8
0
9
O
0
4
7
0
66.
8.
30.
0.
29.
32.
4191.
2269.
350.
9500.
7.
0.
48.
7
5
0
7
0
0
8
4
0
0
1
8
0
66.7
48.0
1199.0
338.9
164.1
106.1
2.0
590.0
7.3
-------
CO
W
M
W
H
SHEET 42
LISTING Of INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAO-FHQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
AJ
V-M
DAY
640
PF
IN FILE RECORD 165 DATA
TF1 TF2 AL
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-6PM
D.O.
TEMP - C
8005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5.
32.
235.
1533.
660.
556.
357.
7.
1310.
7.
1.
1.
8
0
0
9
9
0
9
0
0
5
0
9
SLUOGE-SETT
DAY
644
PF
14.
24.
74.
28.
57.
1172.
450.
212.
1.
710.
7.
0.
27407.
13122.
910.
IN FILE
8
0
0
0
0
9
9
0
0
0
6
5
8
8
0
DELETE
66.7
24.0
0.0
6.1
27.0
24.0
1123.0
423.0
109.8
1.5
400.0
7.6
13.0
FOR
OD
10/ 2/69
CL2
DELETE
32
7
2
23
90
1310
467
441
22
710
7
0
1
3
35
.0
.7
.5
.0
.0
.8
.9
.8
.0
.0
.4
.2
.7
.1
.0
RECORD 167 DATA
TF1
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
SLUDGE-SE
5.
33.
112.
1180.
405.
263.
1.
690.
9.
14.
3.
n
6
0
0
8
8
9
5
0
3
3
2
14.
24.
74.
27.
51.
1275.
378.
306.
1.
1310.
8.
2.
2.
0.
15516.
7087.
960.
8
0
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
8
0
5
0
7
0
TF2
DELETE
66.7
24.0
0.0
7.2
25.0
20.0
1085.0
322.0
114.1
50.0
1.0
650.0
7.8
14.0
AL
66.
8.
30.
1.
28.
18.
1601.
943.
150.
3200.
7.
1.
28.
FOR
OD
7
5
0
6
0
0
8
8
0
0
3
7
0
DELETE
66
28
1083
372
97
0
380
7
9240
4879
970
.7
.0
.9
.9
.9
.2
.0
.5
.1
.7
.0
10/ 6/69
CL2
DELETE
32
7
5
22
88
1289
423
242
10
750
7
5
22
.O
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.0
.0
.8
.2
.0
66.
8.
30.
0.
26.
3771.
1985.
490.
7100.
7.
0.
14.
7
5
0
8
0
9
9
0
0
4
7
0
DELETE
66
14
1073
350
87
0
400
7
7703
3989
940
.7
.0
.9
.9
.8
.2
.0
.6
.8
.8
.0
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-6PM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
OO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
641 IN FILE RECORD 166 DATA
PF
5.5
37.0
202.0
1204.9
619 8
738.2
21*. 0
5.0
1490.0
9.0
12.5
2.5
TF1
14.8
24.0
74.0
30.0
47.0
1144.8
580.7
501.7
199.8
4.0
1280. O
7.5
0.3
TF2
DELETE
66.7
24.0
0.0
7.4
27.0
15.0
976.1
473.0
67.7
0.5
280.0
7.7
AL
32.0
7.7
2.2
24.0
114.0
1354.9
611.9
455.9
265.7
30.0
109O.O
7.3
2.1
FOR 10/ 3/69
OD
66.7
8.5
30.0
0.5
29.0
3335.8
1799.7
460.0
6200.0
7.2
0.6
14509.8
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
6858.8
930.0
13.0
24.0
17.0
CL2
66.7
17.0
979.9
486.8
80.2
0.2
510.0
7.4
0.8
1.1
9284.0
4706.0
95*. 0
646 IN FILE RECORD 168 DATA FOR 10 / 8/69
PF
6.8
32.0
123.0
962.0
385.9
198.0
151.9
1.0
565.0
8.6
13.2
2.7
SLUDGE-SETT
TF1
DELETE
14.8
24.0
74.0
27.0
29.0
892.0
277.9
260.1
0.2
275.0
8.0
0.3
35659.8
16777.9
960.0
TF2
66.7
24.0
0.0
7.7
23.0
20.0
1006.0
290.9
93.9
0.7
320.0
7.1
13.0
AL
32.0
7.7
5.0
20.0
75.0
1139.0
340.9
162.0
6.0
430.0
7.9
4.9
41.0
OD
66.7
8.5
30.0
2.6
25.0
3175.9
1663.8
430.0
5900.0
7.3
2.7
14.0
CL2
66.7
14.0
1023.1
279.9
83.9
0.2
290.0
7.4
6622.0
3369.9
930.0
-------
SHEET 43
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
V-Tl
PI
tn
H
DAY
647
PF
IN
FILE
TF
1
RECORD
TF2
169 DATA
AL
FOR
OD
10/ 9/69
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
vss
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
141.
812.
379.
92.
0.
400.
8.
5.
2.
0
9
9
1
2
0
1
9
9
14.
24.
74.
28.
782.
312.
109.
0.
350.
7.
14309.
6745.
8
0
0
0
0
8
8
5
0
7
9
7
66
24
0
22
946
366
82
0
280
7
0
2
12
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.2
.0
.8
.0
.2
.0
32
7
3
23
144
1248
517
335
263
20
1120
7
0
2
4
77
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
7
9
0
0
9
9
9
9
0
66.
8.
30.
3.
23.
12.
2879.
1567.
405.
011000.
5
3
5
1
0
7.
3.
15.
7 66.7
5
0
5
0
0 15.0
894.0
346.9
9 50.0
8
0 0.2
0 180.0
3 7.4
6
7760.0
4081.7
0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
665
PF
IN
FILE
RECORD
TFl
TF2
171 DATA
AL
FOR
OD
10/27/69
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD 5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
7.
33.
315.
1598.
588.
221.
81.
1.
1360.
7.
0.
3.
2
0
0
9
8
8
7
0
0
1
0
4
SLUDGE-SETT
66.
24.
0.
285.
2236.
868.
473.
209.
2.
1920.
7.
0.
3.
258.
7
0
0
0
0
9
9
9
0
0
2
0
5
0
66
24
0
6
32
262
1897
744
321
167
1
1920
7
97
.7
.0
.0
.9
.0
.0
.1
.9
.9
.8
.5
.0
.4
.0
40
5
62
1597
471
366
0
•
•
•
•
•
182.
25
1120
7
25
•
•
•
•
0
5
0
9
8
2
1
0
0
5
0
DAY 648 IN FILE RECORD 170 DATA FOR 10/10/69
PF
TFl
TF2
AL
OD
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4.
4
34.0
127.
902.
313.
114.
0.
340.
7.
4.
3.
0
8
8
1
5
0
3
3
0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
667
PF
14
24
74
28
19
783
241
106
0
300
7
0
12642
5977
930
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.2
.2
.0
.4
.4
.2
.2
.0
IN FILE
TFl
66.7
24.0
0.0
7.7
24.0
22.0
896.1
274.0
137.9
93.9
2.0
320.0
7.7
16.0
RECORD
TF2
32.
7.
5.
20.
80.
1058.
341.
198.
138.
6.
430.
7.
5.
36.
0
7
5
0
0
0
9
6*.
8.
30.
2.
24.
50.
011498.
2
5
5693.
900.
026000.
3
5
0
172 DATA
AL
7.
2.
22.
FOR
00
7
5
0
6
0
0
1
8
0
0
6
8
0
66.7
22
870
248
110
85
0
275
7
0
1
94t
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.2
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
10/29/49
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4.
33.
256.
1818.
750.
624.
263.
3.
1890.
7.
16.
2.
6
0
0
0
8
0
9
0
0
4
1
1
SLUDGE-SETT
66
24
0
3
24
243
2129
940
539
89
14
1410
7
139
.7
.0
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.8
.8
.9
.0
.0
.3
.0
66.7
24.0
0.0
2.9
32.0
207.0
1768.9
689.8
578.0
361.8
8.0
1250.0
7.3
15.0
2.0
153.0
40.
5.
7.
15.
193.
1950.
829.
35.
1490.
7.
7.
37.
0
5
0
0
0
9
7
0
0
4
0
0
-------
t—J
a
SHEET 44
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FHQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 668
PF
IN
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
173 DATA FOR 10/30/69
AL OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-COWT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
66
.7
24.0
4
34
259
1887
770
718
316
1
1780
7
13
2
.5
.0
.0
.0
•
1
.0
.0
.8
.0
•
•
•
2
9
1
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
672
IN
PF
0
5
31
242
.0
.9
.0
.0
2084.9
879
787
379
6
1640
7
162
.8
.9
.8
.0
.0
.1
.0
66
24
0
6
31
271
1990
801
986
740
14
2100
7
186
•
7
.0
40
5
.0
•
5
.0
•
4
.0
•
0
.9
•
9
.0
•
0
.0
•
•
•
0
1
0
FILE RECORD
TF1
TF2
6
15
126
925
659
288
180
13
1050
7
4
2
6
38
•
•
9
0
.0
•
9
.0
•
0
.0
•
0
.0
•
•
•
•
•
1
9
0
9
0
175 DATA FOR ll/ 3/69
AL OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5
34
222
1679
771
354
267
1
1540
8
19
3
•
•
*
•
•
*
•
•
*
•
•
•
0
0
0
9
7
0
9
5
0
3
3
2
66
24
0
5
30
175
1616
697
303
5
1010
7
18
2
.7
.0
.0
.7
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.5
.0
.6
.8
.3
66
24
0
5
30
219
•
•
«
•
•
•
7
0
0
6
0
0
1752.0
734
620
325
14
1200
7
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
1
8
0
0
4
40
5
7
14
130
2124
929
840
460
18
950
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
.
•
•
7.
7.
SLUDGE-SETT
139
.0
138
•
0
34.
0
5
0
0
0
9
a
1
1
0
0
4
1
0
DAY
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
669 IN
PF
4.3
34.0
315.0
2102
854
.9
.8
1394.0
194
7
2910
7
.0
.0
.0
.3
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
674
IN
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4
34
254
1638
724
278
114
0
1450
7
13
1
.6
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.1
.5
.0
.1
.6
.9
SLUDGE-SETT
FILE RECORD 174 DATA FOR 10/31/69
TF1 TF2 AL 00 CL2
DELETE
66.7 66.7 40.0
24.0 24.0 5.5
0.0 0*0
5.4 4.9 7.0
31.0 32.0 16.0
276.0 269.0 224.0
2302.0
987.8
1549.9
495.8
12.0
1980.0
7.0
142.0
2440.
980.
584.
324.
14.
1980.
7.
136.
9
7
1
0
0
0
1
0
FILE RECORD
TF1
DELETE
66.7
24.0
0.0
5.5
32.0
407.0
3475.0
1644.7
2100.2
919.8
30.0
3400.0
7.1
166.0
TF2
66.
24.
0.
5.
32.
209.
1855.
844.
549.
299.
8.
1540.
7.
10.
3.
169.
7
0
0
4
0
0
0
9
9
9
3
0
3
4
2
0
1774.9
665
943
494
28
.9
.9
.0
.0
1280.0
7
6
51
.3
.9
.0
176 DATA FOR ll/ 5/69
AL OD CL2
40
5
6
15
135
1576
716
375
195
17
1010
7
6
45
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.9
.0
.0
.3
.1
.0
-------
SHEET 45
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATHENT)
C/3
33
W
W
H
DAY
675
PF
IN
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
177 DATA FOR ll/ 6/69
AL OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-6PM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4.
34.
284.
3365.
1894.
199.
159.
0.
1450.
8.
15.
3.
B
0
0
0
e
8
9
6
0
0
3
7
SLUO&E-SETT
DAY
679
PF
IN
66.
24.
0.
6.
31.
346.
25.
7.
174.
FILE
TF
7
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
66.
24.
0.
5.
31.
219.
3365.
1894.
199.
159.
3.
7.
166.
7
0
0
7
0
0
0
8
8
9
5
0
0
RECORD
1
TF2
40.
5.
5.
15.
107.
3827.
2505.
194.
149.
12.
1050.
7.
1.
2.
5.
0
5
4
0
0
9
7
0
8
0
0
2
3
5
4
179 DATA FOR 11/10/69
AL
00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
6005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4.
33.
325.
1932.
854.
350.
219.
0.
1780.
6.
8.
3.
9
0
0
9
7
0
9
2
0
9
4
2
SLUDGE-SETT
66.
24.
0.
5.
32.
204.
1759.
749.
400.
230.
3.
1090.
6.
5.
2.
222.
7
0
0
9
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
8
9
3
0
66.
24.
0.
5.
32.
234.
1974.
824.
450.
249.
5.
1450.
6.
219.
7
0
0
8
0
0
9
9
1
9
0
0
7
0
40.
5.
6.
15.
139.
1784.
694.
509.
298.
18.
1250.
6.
6.
29.
0
5
2
0
0
9
8
9
1
0
0
9
2
0
DAY
676
PF
IN
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
178 DATA FOR ll/ 7/69
AL 00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-fiPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-€PM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5.
34.
297.
1922.
648.
439.
167.
0.
1780.
7.
4
0
0
9
0
7
8
5
0
1
66.
24.
0.
7
0
0
66.
24.
0.
281.
2129.
711.
8343.
a.
7
0
0
0
9
8
8
5
2400.0
7.
251.
1
0
40.
5.
5.
15.
210.
1696.
516.
540.
259.
27.
0
5
0
0
0
9
8
1
9
0
1040.0
7.
5.
63.
9
0
0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
681
PF
IN
FILE
RECORD
TF1
TF2
180 DATA FOR 11/12/49
AL
OO CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4.
35.
317.
1904.
679.
370.
176.
0.
1610.
6.
12.
4.
2
0
0
9
8
1
0
7
0
8
4
0
SLUDGE-SETT
66.
24.
0.
6.
32.
219.
1800.
635.
299.
140.
2.
1780.
6.
198.
7
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
0
5
0
9
0
66.
24.
0.
5.
32.
360.
2342.
1871.
1119.
579.
17.
2400.
6.
7.
3.
248.
7
0
0
9
0
0
9
8
9
8
0
0
9
1
4
0
40.
5.
4.
15.
109.
1623.
494.
359.
179.
16.
1280.
7.
4.
50.
0
5
6
0
0
0
8
8
7
0
0
0
5
0
-------
SHEET 46
RJ
H
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
AJ
DAY 682 IN FILE RECORD
PF TF1 TF2
181 DATA FOR 11/13/69
AL 00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5.
0
35.0
198.
0
2350.0
1074.
859.
B
9
198.0
57.0
1890.
9.
0
5
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
686
PF
IN
66
24
0
6
32
210
1607
509
404
180
2
1640
8
197
•
•
•
•
•
•
,7
0
0
1
0
0
.9
.8
•
0
.0
•
•
•
•
FILE
0
0
6
0
66
24
0
5
32
231
1829
1285
550
270
5
1600
7
186
.7
.0
.0
.9
.0
.0
.9
.9
.2
.0
.0
.0
.6
.0
RECORD
TF1
TF2
40
5
5
15
122
1735
664
349
171
17
990
7
3
1
5
46
.0
.5
.5
.0
.0
.0
.8
.7
.7
.0
.0
.4
.1
.8
.5
.0
183 DATA FOR 11/17/69
AL OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
5.
34.
344.
2094.
754.
433.
214.
0.
1920.
8.
10.
1.
4
0
0
8
9
9
2
6
0
6
1
6
SLUDGE-SETT
66
24
0
6
32
280
2153
727
606
296
1
2200
8
6
1
272
•
*
•
•
m
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
7
0
0
1
0
0
0
9
0
0
8
0
1
2
I
0
66
24
0
6
32
387
2490
938
1050
529
11
2850
8
297
.7
.0
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.0
.1
.9
.0
.0
.0
.0
40
5
7
16
65
1580
467
169
130
18
1280
7
7
46
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.9
.0
.5
.0
.7
.0
.0
DAY 683 IN FILE RECORD 182 DATA FOR 11/14/69
PF
FEED-GMt
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
6
29
311
2010
744
449
176
0
2300
6
.1
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.5
.0
.1
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
688
IN
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BO 05
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
272
1812
706
531
243
3
2150
8
.0
.1
.9
.9
.8
.5
.0
.3
SLUDGE-SETT
TF1
66.7
24.0
0.0
2.0
24.0
204.0
1788.0
589.8
0.4
1640.0
7.5
223.0
TF2
DELETE
66. 7
24.0
0.0
2.5
25.0
249.0
1940.0
674.9
401.9
161.7
2.0
2020.0
7.6
264.0
AL OD CL2
40.0
5.5
7.4
15.0
160.0
1729.8
524.8
319.8
199.8
23.0
1050.0
7.2
7.5
40.0
FILE RECORD 1 »4 DATA FOR 11/19/49
TF1
66.7
24.0
0.0
191.0
1651.9
583.9
390.0
259.9
5.5
1450.0
7.7
171.0
TF2
DELETE
66.7
24.0
0.0
218.0
1569.9
530.0
275.8
180.0
2.5
1310.0
7.0
9.3
1.5
415.0
AL OD CL2
40.0
5.5
205.0
2209.9
834.9
890.1
550.2
70.0
2400.0
7.1
69.0
-------
SHEET 47
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TRFATMENTI
CO
ffi
W
M
DAY
689
PF
IN
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5.
32.
493.
2785.
2469.
914.
0.
3500.
8.
17.
2.
9
0
0
0
7
0
3
0
7
9
1
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
700
PF
5.
32.
238.
1782.
704.
260.
110.
0.
1540.
7.
16.
1.
IN
2
0
0
9
8
0
1
2
0
4
4
3
SLUDGE-SETT
FILE
TF
1
RECORD
TF2
185 DATA FOR 11/20/69
AL OD CL2
DELETE DELETE DELETE
66.
24.
0.
6.
28.
212.
1828.
1659.
520.
1.
2850.
8.
240.
FILE
TF
66.
24.
0.
6.
29.
185.
1204.
1204.
279.
4.
1490.
7.
13.
2.
169.
7
0
0
8
0
0
0
8
0
3
0
7
0
66
24
0
6
28
376
784
642
956
1
3005
8
376
.7
.0
.0
.8
.0
.0
.9
.9
.1
.4
.0
.4
.0
RECORD
1
7
0
0
2
0
0
9
9
8
0
0
6
2
0
0
TF2
66
24
0
6
29
177
1636
596
383
176
2
1360
7
144
.7
.0
.0
.2
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.0
.5
.0
.5
.0
40.
5.
7.
15.
113.
1910.
679.
1099.
750.
18.
1920.
7.
5.
1.
7.
60.
0
5
3
0
0
0
9
8
0
0
0
8
8
3
2
0
187 DATA FOR 12/ 1/69
AL
40.
5.
6.
15.
372.
2967.
1209.
1760.
819.
85.
1450.
7.
6.
45.
OD CL2
0
5
4
0
0
9
7
2
9
0
0
5
4
0
DAY 690 IN
PF
FILE
TF1
RECORD
TF2
186 DATA FOR 11/21/69
AL 00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0 • 0 *
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
*
31.
195.
11060.
10084.
249.
0.
1450.
7.
0
0
9
2
9
4
0
1
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 702
PF
IN
66.
24.
0.
26.
136.
1539.
557.
216.
111.
1.
1310.
7.
168.
FILE
7
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
9
0
0
2
0
TF1
66.
24.
0.
26.
145.
1555.
559.
79.
39.
1.
1250.
7.
310.
RECORD
7
0
9
0
0
0
9
9
9
0
0
1
0
40.
5.
15.
126.
1820.
669.
4iO.
263.
2.
1890.
7.
7.
0
5
0
0
0
9
0
9
5
0
2
1
188 DATA FOR 127 3/69
TF2
AL
OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
80 05
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4.
32.
356.
1880.
679.
205.
109.
1.
1780.
7.
14.
3.
8
0
0
0
8
9
8
0
0
4
0
5
SLUDGE-SETT
66.
24.
0.
5.
29.
202.
1755.
587.
243.
133.
1.
1640.
7.
204.
7
0
0
3
0
0
9
9
8
9
5
0
6
0
66.
24.
0.
5.
29.
324.
2374.
894.
959.
455.
18.
2200.
7.
7.
3.
197.
7
0
0
4
0
0
8
8
7
8
0
0
5
8
9
0
40.
5.
6.
15.
132.
1975.
674.
578.
?80.
30.
1120.
7.
6.
38.
0
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
0
-------
SHEET 48
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
•P-
00
VJ1
CO
DAY 703 IN FILE RECORD 189 DATA FOR 12/ 4/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL OD CL2
FEED-GPH
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4.
31.
285.
,8
0
0
1669.9
579.
308.
120.
0.
1920.
8.
21.
4.
9
.2
2
2
0
5
2
2
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
707
PF
5.
32.
329.
1990.
640.
520.
180.
6.
IN
66
24
0
6
198
1638
585
136
50
2
1850
8
185
•
•
•
•
•
•
ft
•
•
•
*•
•
•
FILE
7
0
0
2
0
0
9
1
O
0
0
0
0
66
24
0
6
28
489
3097
1201
1823
809
26
2100
7
191
.7
.0
.0
.4
.0
.0
.9
.7
.7
.9
.0
.0
.8
.0
RECORD
TF1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1360.0
7.
2.
0.
3
9
8
SLUDGE-SETT
66
24
0
5
30
252
1959
574
373
119
•
•
•
•
•
7
0
0
3
0
.0
•
•
»
9
8
8
.9
8.0
1540.
7.
1
•
0
2
1
TF2
66
24
0
6
30
246
1963
594
509
169
8
1410
7
.7
.0
.0
.8
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.0
.0
.2
40
5
7
15
163
1628
579
726
3O6
29
1440
7
6
1
7
43
.0
.5
.3
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.0
.0
.0
.6
.7
.9
.3
.0
191 DATA FOR 12/ 8/69
AL OD CL2
40
5
6
16
78
1492
341
265
12
910
7
.0
.5
.2
.0
.0
.0
.8
.8
.5
.0
.1
0.4
214
•
0
208
.0
6
34
.1
.0
DAY 704 IN FILE RECORD 190 DATA FOR 12/ 5/69
ff TF1 TF2 AL OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM 66.7 66.7 40.0
DEPTH-FT 24.0 24.0 5.5
RECY-GPM 0.0 0.0
D.O. 4.9 5.5 5.7 7.6
TEMP - C 30.0
BOOS 344.0
TS 1578.0
VTS 519.9
SS 440.0
VSS 216.0
SETT SOL 0.2
COLOR 1540.0
PH 6.6
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
SLUDGE-SETT
26.0
166.0
1755.0
524.9
468.1
220.0
2.1
1600.0
7.0
155.0
DAY 709 IN FILE
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS 309.0
TS 2008.9
VTS 719.8
SS 364.0
VSS 244.1
SETT SOL 2.5
COLOR 2100.0
PH 8.6
NITROGEN 33.6
PHOSPHOR 2.7
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
SLUDGE-SETT
TF1
66.7
24.0
0.0
264.0
2077.0
714.9
464.1
290.1
7.0
2200.0
8.5
234.0
26.0
177.0
1797.0
1531.9
520.0
239.8
4.0
1450.0
7.4
155.0
RECORD
TF2
66.7
24.0
0.0
331.0
2223.0
794.9
2344.0
393.8
16.0
2480.0
8.6
30.4
4.3
236.0
15.0
100.0
1944.8
584.8
737.9
383.8
20.0
1280.0
7.7
7.5
46.0
192 DATA FOR 12/10/69
AL OD CL2
DELETE
40.0
5.5
116.0
1725.0
519.9
319.8
259.9
15.0
1010.0
8.0
50.0
-------
SHEET 49
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
vn
CO
FU
W
DAY 710 IN FILE RECORD 193 DATA FOR 12/11/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL 00 CL2
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5.
29.
252.
1826.
615.
393.
190.
6.
1250.
6.
4.
2
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
4
4
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
714
PF
5.
30.
300.
1620.
869.
249.
0.
1490.
8.
15.
5.
IN
66.
24.
0.
5.
27.
205.
7
0
0
7
0
0
1654.9
522.
404.
180.
0.
1090.
6.
168.
FILE
8
0
0
1
0
6
0
66.
24.
0.
6.
28.
159.
1410.
402.
173.
79.
8.
1120.
7.
160.
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
9
9
0
0
1
0
RECORD
TF1
1
0
0
0
9
9
1
0
0
0
1
SLUDGE-SETT
66.
24.
0.
6.
26.
162.
1609.
549.
266.
190.
1.
1450.
7.
9.
3.
155.
7
0
0
2
0
0
9
7
1
1
4
0
7
4
9
0
TF2
66.
24.
0.
6.
27.
183.
7
0
0
1
0
0
1689.9
599.
249.
3.
1410.
7.
153.
9
9
0
0
6
0
40.
5.
6.
15.
92,
1629.
446.
195.
108.
11.
990.
7.
5.
2.
6.
47.
0
5
2
0
0
9
7
9
0
0
0
1
7
6
2
0
195 DATA FOR 12/15/69
AL
40.
5.
7.
16.
98.
1679.
532.
279.
17.
1010.
7.
7.
42.
OD CL2
0
5
0
0
0
9
0
8
0
0
4
1
0
DAY
711
PF
IN
FILE RECORD 194 DATA FOR 12/12/69
TF1 TF2 AL OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5.
30.
262.
1907.
657.
414.
263.
6.
1360.
6.
1
0
0
9
8
1
9
0
0
2
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
716
PF
IN
66.
24.
0.
6.
28.
180.
1750.
544.
299.
6.
1280.
6.
168.
FILE
7
0
0
1
0
0
0
9
9
6
0
6
0
66.
24.
0.
6.
28.
188.
1759.
569.
293.
183.
6.
1450.
6.
163.
RECORD
TF1
7
0
0
2
0
0
9
8
8
9
9
0
9
0
40
5
7
12
40
1398
337
110
90
7
810
7
7
40
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
5
4
0
0
0
8
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
196 DATA FOR 12/17/*9
TF2
AL
00 CL2
DELETE
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5.
30.
277.
1808.
606.
190.
0.
1920.
7.
9.
7.
8
0
0
0
9
1
5
0
5
9
4
SLUDGE-SETT
66.
24.
0.
6.
27.
198.
7
0
0
1
0
0
1748.0
545.
220.
3.
1640.
7.
198.
0
0
0
0
4
0
66.
24.
0.
6.
27.
203.
1781.
549.
2143.
3.
1720.
7.
6.
7.
192.
7
0
0
2
0
0
9
9
8
0
0
5
6
6
0
40
5
6
15
118
1864
579
20
1310
7
6
39
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
0
5
1
0
0
9
8
0
0
4
1
0
-------
to
ta
M
w
H
SHEET 50
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DAT* BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
IMEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 717 IN FILE RECORD 197 DATA FOR 12/18/69
PF TF1 TF2 AL OD CL2
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
TEMP - C 30.0
BODS 246.0
TS 1754.9
VTS 599.8
SS 239.8
VSS 90.0
SETT SOL 0.1
COLOR 1720.0
PH 7.1
NITROGEN 12.9
PHOSPHOR 6.1
00-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 751 IN
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS 214.0
TS 1625.9
VTS 517.8
SS 421.7
VSS 197.7
S6TT SOL 2.5
COLOR 1720.0
PH 7.8
NITROGEN 16.2
PHOSPHOR 9.7
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
SLUDGE-SETT
66.7
24.0
0.0
26.0
195.0
1604.0
371.9
169.9
86.0
0.9
1450.0
7.4
183.0
FILE
TF1
33.3
24.0
0.0
66.7
24.0
0.0
26.0
206.0
1685.0
514.9
204.1
60.1
2.5
1640.0
7.7
191.0
RECORD
TF2
66.7
i 24.0
0.0
163.0
1860.0
601.9
484.0
252.0
2.0
1820.0
8.1
144.0
40.0
5.5
15.0
79.0
1762.0
585.0
260.0
149.8
17.0
950.0
7.6
6.1
3.8
6.1
28.0
199 DATA
AL
DELETE
33.3
5.0
36.0
1511.0
440.9
243.8
176.0
0.2
1250.0
7.7
4.5
4.8
9.0
FOR 1/21/70
OD CL2
33.3 33.3
4.3
30.0
47.0
1613.0
474.0
310.0
217.8
0.4
1490.0
7.7
47.0
DAY 749 IN
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS 356.0
TS 2232.0
VTS 863.8
SS 646.0
VSS 319.7
SETT SOL 1.5
COLOR 3005.0
PH 9.1
NITROGEN 23.0
PHOSPHOR 7.6
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 758 IN
PF
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O. 1.0
TEMP - C 31.0
BODS 554.0
TS 2957.9
VTS 1328.6
SS 871.8
VSS 447.9
SETT SOL 0.0
COLOR 5400.0
PH 9.2
NITROGEN 22.0
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
SLUDGE-SETT
FILE RECORD 198 DATA
TF1 TF2 AL
DELETE
33.3 66.7 33.3
24.0 24.0 5.0
0.0 0.0
238.0 119.0
1943.0 1849.9
680.8 604.9
624.0 496.2
294.1 285.9
0.5 1.5
FOR 1/19/70
OD CL2
33.3 33.3
4.3
30.0
104.0
1721.0
523.8
321.9
195.9
30.0 0.2
2300.0 1640.0 1640.9 1890.0
8.7 8.2
18.0
9.7
228.0 109.0
FILE RECORD 20O DATA
TF1 TF2 AL
DELETE
33.3 66.7 33.3
24.0 24.0 5.0
0.0 0.0
3.2 6.1
28.0 14.0
128.0 441.0 123.0
1879.8 1915.8
634.8 677.8
137.9 82.0
47.9 46.0
0.0 0.5 0.2
2400.0 3850.0 2550.0
8.2 9.0 8.4
6.0
676.0 114.0
7.7 7.5
104.0
FOR 1/28/70
00 CL2
33.3 33.3
4.3
30.0
6.4
11.0
128.0
1846.0
614.9
199.8
101.9
12.0 0.5
3100=0 2350.0
8.0 7.7
6.8
128.0
-------
SHEET 51
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
o
H
CO
pa
M
W
H
Ui
DAY
759
PF
IN
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
201 DATA
AL
FOR
OD
1/29/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT,
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4.
33.
185.
2781.
1295.
740.
377.
0.
5180.
9.
22.
0
0
0
0
9
0
7
2
0
1
7
33
24
0
18
94
1956
723
388
183
0
2550
8
1
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.1
.9
.2
.0
.0
.0
66
24
0
3
22
557
2765
1199
759
397
1
4600
8
505
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.7
.8
.8
.5
.0
.4
.0
33
5
1
18
190
2295
920
671
455
6
3500
7
4
0
157
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.9
.8
.0
.0
.8
.5
.3
.0
33.
4.
30.
5.
18.
612.
400.
6.
2910.
7.
5.
114.
3
3
0
4
0
1
0
5
0
7
5
0
33.3
114.0
2003.0
734.9
356.1
270.0
0.5
2550.0
7.7
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
763
PF
IN
FILE RECORD
TF1
TF2
203 DATA
AL
FOR
OD
2/ 2/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
B005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
603.
3321.
1518.
858.
512.
0.
5650.
9.
22.
0
0
0
1
0
5
0
6
9
33
24
0
72
2026
675
280
198
0
2550
8
.3
.0
.0
.0
.9
.7
.1
.0
.0
.0
.1
66
24
0
541
3108
1357
645
389
0
4000
8
653
.7
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.7
.9
.2
.0
.9
.0
33
5
238
0
3980
8
0
177
.3
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
.0
.0
33.
4.
30.
505.
334.
4.
3005.
7.
76.
3
3
0
9
1
0
0
7
0
33.3
76.0
2141.1
718.9
173.9
122.0
0.5
3005.0
7.7
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
760 IN
PF
FILE RECORD 202 DATA
TF1 TF2 AL
FOR 1/30/70
00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
vss
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5
30
569
2891
1374
820
476
1
5180
9
26
.5
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.0
.0
.0
.6
.4
33.3 66
24.0 24
0.0 0
9
11.0 25
127
1528
551
520
254
4
2020
8
1.0
167
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
*
*
7
0
0
4
0
0
9
7
0
1
0
0
7
C
33.
5.
7.
16.
78.
1813.
603.
402.
250.
0.
2200.
8.
8.
78.
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
5
0
0
3
0
33
4
30
8
16
28
5000
7
a
166
.3
.3
.0
.2
.0
.0
.0
.9
.3
.0
33.3
166.0
2635.9
990.8
981.7
565.7
17.0
4790.0
8.1
6.6
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
765
IN
PF
FILE RECORD
204 DATA
TF1 TF2
AL
FOR
t
OO
?/ 4/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
8005
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5
29
618
3213
1388
629
403
0
5000
9
31
0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.6
.5
.0
.3
.9
.6
33.3 66
24.0 24
0.0 0
9
23
208
1880
584
487
281
1
2150
8
208
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
9
9
0
0
7
0
33.
5.
6.
12.
169.
2749.
1007.
760.
542.
5.
3980.
7.
8.
128.
3
0
5
0
0
9
8
1
2
0
0
9
4
0
33
4
30
7
15
655
445
8
3005
8
7
.3
.3
.0
.2
.0
.8
.8
.0
.0
.6
.3
33.3
SLUDGE-SETT
-------
OT
«
M
Ui
SHEET 52
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 767 IN FILE RECORD 205 DATA FOR 2/ 6/70
PF TF1 TF2 AL 00 CL?
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-6PM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
ss
vss
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
33.3
24.0
0.0
28.0
733.0
3565.0
1519.7
B23.9
553.8
0.2
5900.0
9.8
38.6
9.2
0.
,0
66.7
24.0
0.0
7.6
27.0
603.0
3374.9
1419.8
854.1
482.0
0.5
5100.0
9.4
34.2
8.2
558.0
33.3
5.0
3.0
13.0
85.0
2062.9
709.8
386.0
277.9
0.2
2695.0
8.4
4.2
89.0
33.3
4.
30.
17.
5.
3
0
0
5
33.3
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 772 IN
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
PF
DELETE
4.8
30.0
241.0
1894.0
657.2
401.9
153.7
0.1
FILE
RECORD 207 DATA
TF1
33.
24.
0.
1.
4.
141.
2298.
810.
321.
244.
0.
3
0
0
3
0
0
8
8
9
1
1
2480.0 3000.0
8.2
1.5
0.8
8.
it
TF2
66.7
24.0
0.0
9.8
27.0
278.0
1880.0
652.9
461.7
183.6
0.7
2480.0
8.3
1.3
0.7
304.0
AL
33.3
5.0
7.1
9.0
88.0
2216.0
782.9
310.0
230.0
0.1
FOR
2/11/70
00
33.
4.
30.
12.
8.
1228.
661.
30.
3300.0 5000.
8.2
9.6
100.0
7.
12.
88.
3
3
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
8
0
0
CL2
33.3
88. 0
2206.8
785.8
458.0
294.1
1.4
3200.0
7.9
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
770
IN
PF
FILE
RECORD
TF1
206 DATA
TF2
AL
FOR
2/ 9/70
OD
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
00-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
4
29
490
.
5
.0
•
0
2702.9
1204
628
371
0
4790
9
35
4
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
9
0
9
1
0
8
8
2
33.
24.
0.
3.
25.
100.
2423.
910.
543.
369.
0.
3000.
8.
13.
7.
3
0
0
7
0
0
8
8
8
8
2
0
5
1
7
66.
24.
0.
3.
27.
381.
2635.
1137.
615.
343.
1.
3800.
9.
400.
7
0
0
8
0
0
0
8
8
8
O
0
4
0
33.3
5.0
7.0
14.0
143.0
2375.9
991.0
898.1
505.9
6.5
3720.0
8.5
106.0
33
.3
33.3
4.3
30
.0
5.9
18
653
443
5
.0
.9
.9
.0
3600.0
8
95
.1
.0
95.0
2489.0
833.8
652.1
479.9
0.1
3200.0
8.1
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
773
IN
PF
FILE
TF1
RECORD 208 DATA
TF2
AL
FOR
OD
2/12/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
5
29
234
1699
582
396
180
0
2020
7
2
9
•
7
.0
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
9
7
1
0
2
0
4
7
6
33.
24.
0.
6.
4.
59.
1903.
657.
333.
245.
0.
2480.
7.
3
0
0
5
0
0
9
8
8
9
0
0
8
66.
24.
0.
10.
24.
161.
1712.
556.
437.
207.
0.
1920.
7.
171.
7
0
0
0
0
0
9
8
9
7
5
0
9
0
33.3
5.0
8.6
11.0
61.0
2039.9
846.9
346.0
241.9
0.1
2780.0
8.0
11.5
3.0
9.5
52.0
33
4
30
11
8
859
487
15
3100
8
11
.3
.3
.0
.0
.0
.9
33.. 3
50.0
1866.9
626.9
283.8
.9 235.8
.0
.0
.0
.5
0.0
2480.0
8.1
50.0
SLUDGE-SETT
-------
SHEET 53
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENTI
to
M
H
Ln
UJ
DAY
774 IN
PF
FILE
TF1
RECORD
TF2
209 DATA
AL
FOR
OD
2/13/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD 5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
248
1841
828
545
226
2
.0
.8
.8
.9
.0
.0
3300.0
7
1
1
.8
.1
.1
33
24
0
9
4
53
1770
655
323
220
0
3200
7
.3
.0
.0
.6
.0
.0
.9
.9
.7
.0
.3
.0
.9
66
24
0
9
20
207
1791
731
487
215
3
2100
8
170
.7
.0
.0
.6
.0
.0
.9
.8
.9
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
33
5
9
9
60
1990
839
364
241
0
2600
8
10
39
.3
.0
.7
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.0
.2
.0
.1
.9
.0
33.
4.
30.
12.
9.
995.
505.
14.
3850.
8.
12.
52.
3
3
0
0
0
7
9
0
0
0
0
0
33.3
52.0
1828.9
711.8
356.1
205.9
0.2
2600.0
8.0
3.2
6.4
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
780
IN
PF
FILE
TF1
RECORD
TF2
211 DATA
AL
FOR
OD
2/19/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
0
29
712
3722
1991
632
379
0
7100
10
19
15
.2
.0
.0
.0
.6
.0
.9
.0
.0
.2
.8
.6
33
24
0
1
14
100
2259
870
194
163
0
2850
8
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.7
.0
.8
.0
.0
.6
66
24
0
8
24
676
3643
1961
671
422
0
7100
9
556
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.9
.0
.5
.0
.7
.0
33
5
1
12
295
2630
1119
146
114
0
4310
e
12
4
2
241
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.8
.1
.1
.2
.0
.8
.3
.4
.2
.0
33.
4.
30.
4.
17.
476.
333.
3.
2900.
8.
4.
112.
3
3
0
1
0
0
e
0
0
3
7
0
SLUDGE-SETT
33.3
112.0
2407.9
984.8
418.0
316.1
0.0
3005.0
8.1
1007.9
568.2
20.0
DAY
779
PF
IN
FILE RECORD 210 DATA
TF1 TF2 AL
FOR
00
2/18/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-fT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CDNT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
0.
30.
1124.
4604.
2427.
7
0
0
0
7
1857.9
1053.
0.
8500.
10.
19.
4.
6
0
0
2
2
4
33.
24.
0.
1.
12.
96.
2205.
892.
429.
285.
1.
2150.
9.
3
0
0
2
0
0
0
8
9
9
5
0
1
66
24
0
9
27
961
4633
2544
1322
769
1
8500
9
IB
6
9*1
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.0
.9
.5
.0
.7
.1
.5
.0
33.
5.
7.
8.
177.
2174.
877.
0.
3100.
8.
8.
168.
3
0
5
0
0
0
8
5
0
7
1
0
33.3
4.3
30.0
5.9
14.0
923.7
563.9
23.0
3850.0
8.2
5.9
139.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
781
PF
IN
FILE
RECORD 212 DATA
TF1
TF2
AL
FOR
00
33
139
2105
820
1678
294
0
2430
7
74*
443
10
.3
.0
.1
.9
.1
.1
.0
.0
.9
.1
.9
.0
2/20/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
0.
29.
651.
3265.
1566.
783.
478.
0.
5650.
8.
10.
2.
7
0
0
9
6
9
1
2
0
8
6
1
33.
24.
0.
4.
14.
137.
2444.
972.
411.
314.
0.
3000.
8.
3
0
0
7
0
0
0
9
9
0
2
0
1
66
24
0
9
23
590
3064
1472
611
390
0
4000
8
594
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.6
.8
.0
.3
.0
.4
.0
33.
5.
3.
11.
224.
2724.
1140.
533.
381 .
0.
3000.
8.
5.
256.
3
0
4
0
0
9
9
7
7
2
0
3
2
0
33.3
4.3
30.0
5.1
16.0
1836.2
1130.0
55.0
4900.0
7.8
5.6
124.0
SLUDGE-SETT
33
124
2570
1062
455
337
0
4900
7
0
6
1044
599
30
.3
.0
.9
.8
.9
.7
.2
.0
.8
.8
.2
.0
.8
.0
-------
as
M
H
SHEET 54
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 784 IN
PF
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-fT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
ss
vss
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
00-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
4
30
101
1242
304
342
108
0
1310
8
97
7
.7
.0
.0
.0
.9
.1
.0
.1
.0
.3
.8
.1
FILE RECORD 213 DATA
TF1 TF2 AL
DELETE DELETE DELETE
33.3 66.7 33.3
24.0 24.0 5.0
0.
1.
16.
90.
2266.
937.
316.
216.
0.
2800.
7.
0
1
0
0
0
9
1
0
0
0
8
0
.0
4.0
26
156
1439
487
406
146
0
2020
8
61
9
172
.0
.0
.9
.8
.1
.1
.3
.0
.3
.8
.2
.0
5
11
106
2449
1124
433
296
0
3200
7
5
109
.3
.0
.0
.0
.8
.9
.0
.8
.0
.6
.8
.0
FOR 2/23/70
OD CL2
DELETE DELETE
33.3 33.3
4.3
30.
8.
15.
7.
8.
107.
0
2
0
5
2
0
107.0
2541.9
1140.8
530.0
339.9
2.5
3720.0
7.4
SLUOGE-SETT
DAY
793
IN
PF
FILE
RECORD
TF1
TF2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
449
2400
1195
544
310
0
3840
9
21
6
.0
.9
.9
.1
.0
.4
.0
.3
. 1
.7
33.
24.
0.
34.
1364.
431.
144.
87.
1.
1090.
7.
3
0
0
0
8
8
0
8
0
0
8
66
24
0
335
2167
1016
507
297
2
3500
8
12
6
292
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.8
.0
.0
.6
.8
.0
.0
215 DATA
AL
DELETE
33
5
57
1835
649
525
293
7
2150
7
30
.3
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.8
.5
.0
.7
.0
FOR
00
3/ 4/70
CL2
DELETE DELETE
33.
4.
30.
3719.
1929.
150.
8500.
7.
4.
3
3
0
7
8
0
0
4
0
33.3
4.0
1436.0
497.8
187.9
105.8
1.4
1160.0
7.5
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
791 IN FILE RECORD 214 DATA
PF TFl TF2 AL
DELETE DELETE
33.3 66.7 33.3
24.0 24.0 5.0
0.0 0.0
221
1799
684
620
262
0
2780
20
8
.0
.0
.8
.1
.1
.4
.0
.7
.6
32.
0
1613.0
622.
231.
143.
0.
1540.
11.
5.
9
9
7
1
0
2
0
161.
1627.
726.
408.
184.
0.
1890.
65.
0
9
8
0
0
9
O
0
94.0
1763.9
639.9
315.8
202.0
2.5
1890.0
84.0
FOR 3/ 2/70
OO CL2
33.3 33.3
4.3
30.0
31.
.0
1432.9
1359.8
721.9
35
.0
3720.0
546
288
181
0
.8
.0
.8
.2
1780.0
• J
31.0
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
794
IN FILE
PF
RECORD 216 DATA
TFl
TF2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
0
28
523
2708
1308
810
458
0
4500
9
4
.3
.0
.0
.1
.0
.2
.0
.5
.0
.8
.7
33.
24.
0.
1.
16.
23.
1277.
414.
133.
104.
0.
950.
8.
3
0
0
3
0
0
9
9
9
0
5
0
7
66.
24.
0.
9.
25.
423.
2526.
1190.
7
0
0
8
0
0
0
7
829.7
453.
5.
4600.
8.
7
0
0
,5
378.0
AL
DELETE
33.3
5.0
7.6
16.0
38.0
1535.0
526.9
193.7
144.0
2.0
1820.0
7.8
11.6
6.3
9.0
8.0
FOR
3/ 5/70
OD
DELETE
33
4
30
7
14
1705
931
50
4250
7
7
0
.3
.3
.0
.9
.0
.9
.9
.0
.0
.8
.9
.0
CL2
DELETE
33
0
1228
349
88
82
0
950
7
.3
.0
.0
.9
.1
.0
.2
.0
.8
SLUDGE-SETT
-------
SHEET 55
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
O
V/l
CO
P5
M
M
H
Ul
Ul
DAY 795
PF
IN
FILE RECORD
TF1 TF2
217 DATA
AL
FOR
00
3/ 6/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
D€PTH-FT
RECY-6PM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOOS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT .
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
0.
91.
616.
3256.
1574.
899.
503.
3.
4900.
7.
23.
8.
2
0
0
0
9
9
7
0
0
3
2
9
33
24
0
17
82
1711
591
280
184
0
1980
9
3
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.1
.8
.1
.0
.0
.0
.2
.2
66.7
24.0
0.0
3.5
28.0
571.0
3200.9
1441.7
1103.8
603.8
9.0
5100.0
8.8
571.0
33
5
3
15
89
1871
686
634
362
7
2400
7
4
50
.3
.0
.4
.0
.0
.9
.8
.1
.2
.0
.0
.8
.2
.0
33
4
30
4
15
707
491
25
2900
7
4
33
.3
.3
.0
.2
.0
.7
.9
.0
.0
.6
.4
.0
33
33
1428
411
230
146
0
1450
7
4
5
.3
.0
.9
.9
.1
.1
.2
.0
.5
.9
.5
SLUOGE-SETT
DAY
805
PF
IN
FILE RECORD
TF1
TF2
219 DATA
AL
FOR
3/16/70
OD
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
7.
27.
510.
2640.
1140.
498.
280.
0.
4600.
9.
27.
4.
4
0
0
9
9
0
1
2
0
6
7
8
33
24
33
22
257
2381
982
441
263
0
3600
8
13
3
0
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.1
.9
.8
.9
.5
.0
.9
.6
.1
.9
33.3
24.0
33.3
8.2
24.0
390.0
2507.0
1065.7
598.1
330.1
1.0
4250.0
9.2
390.0
16
7
1
14
100
2115
746
358
280
0
2780
8
1
147
.0
.7
.0
.0
.0
.0
.8
.2
.1
.0
.0
.3
.0
.0
33
4
30
7
14
545
289
2
2695
8
7
.3
.3
.0
.9
.0
.9
.8
.0
.0
.0
.9
33
.3
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY 801 IN FILE RECORD 218 DATA FOR 3/12/70
PF
TFl
TF2
DELETE
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
615
2732
1186
651
331
2
5180
9
84
21
.0
.0
.8
.8
.9
.0
.0
.6
.2
.8
33
24
33
2482
1041
402
212
0
3500
8
.3
.0
.3
.9
.8
.2
.0
.0
.0
.9
33.
24.
33.
512.
2817.
1309.
576.
312.
1.
4000.
9.
28.
S.
542.
3
0
3
0
0
9
1
1
5
0
3
9
0
0
AL
00 CL2
DELETE DEtrre DELETE
16
7
119
2133
888
321
229
0
2250
8
109
.0
.7
.0
.9
.7
.9
.7
.1
.0
.4
.0
33
4
30
1014
590
26
3000
8
.3 33,3
.3
.0
.0
.2
.0
.0
.1
SLUOGE-SETT
DAY 809 IN FILE RECORD 220 DATA FOR 3/20/70
PF TFl TF2 AL OD CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
646
.0
3054.0
1449
1072
437
0
4900
9
16
4
.7
.0
.8
.0
.0
.4
.4
.2
33.
24.
33.
297.
2512.
1064.
547.
325.
1.
4600.
8.
3
0
3
0
0
B
7
8
2
0
3
33.
24.
33.
435.
5830.
1277.
650.
364.
0.
4500.
8.
15.
3.
500.
3
0
3
0
0
9
0
0
5
0
9
1
6
0
DELETE DELETE DELETE
16
7
89
2031
761
350
241
0
2400
7
96
.0
.7
.0
.0
.8
.0
.9
.7
.0
.5
.0
33
4
30
247
165
4
2350
7
97
.3
.3
.0
.8
.7
.0
.0
.7
.0
33.3
97.0
1840.0
653.9
257.8
151.9
1.0
2300.0
7.8
SLUOGE-SETT
-------
OT
SB
M
a
SHEET 56
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FHOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY
812 IN
PF
FILE
TF1
RECORD
TF2
221 DATA
AL
FOR
00
3/23/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
DU
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
OO-CONT.
SS-CONT .
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
0
30
402
2378
1056
640
356
0
3850
9
10
8
.6
.0
.0
.9
.7
.2
.1
.1
.0
.4
.8
33
24
33
27
247
2164
857
520
321
0
3500
8
2
7
0
.3
33
.0 24
.3
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.9
.5
.0
.2
.1
.5
33
5
28
329
2300
951
656
385
2
3850
264
.3
.0
.3
.3
.0
.0
.8
.8
.1
.9
.0
.0
.0
16
7
1
17
55
2069
848
316
232
0
2200
1
61
.0
.7
.2
.0
.0
.0
.9
.1
.2
.3
.0
.0
.0
33
4
30
6
18
538
320
9
3005
6
53
.3
.3
.0
.5
.0
.0
.1
.0
.0
.6
.0
33.3
53.0
2032.0
735.9
267.9
196.2
0.2
2910.0
7O
• o
902.0
553.8
SLUDGE-SETT
DAV
815
IN
PF
FILE
TF1
RECORD
TF2
223 DATA
AL
FOR
OD
3/26/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
1
30
509
2547
1211
870
487
0
COLOR 4600
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
9
22
10
.0
.0
.0
.9
.7
.0
.9
.0
.0
.3
.5
.8
SLUDGE-SETT
33
24
33
24
274
2238
1037
440
259
1
3005
8
0
1969
1039
30
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.7
.0
.9
.0
.0
.7
.4
.9
.7
.0
33
24
33
3
28
359
2360
979
648
360
1
4600
9
404
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.9
.8
.1
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
16
7
1
17
66
2378
1116
261
209
0
2695
8
22
6
1
59
.0
.7
.7
.0
.0
.9
.9
.8
.9
.3
.0
.3
.9
.9
.7
.0
33
4
30
6
18
2648
1476
18
5900
8
6
53
.3
.3
.0
.4
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.4
.0
33.3
53.0
2133.0
864.9
580.1
339.9
0.8
2695.0
8.1
1055.9
619.7
30.0
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
OO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
814
PF
504
2626
1179
807
495
0
4600
9
23
11
*
IN FILE RECORD 222 DATA
TF1 TF2 AL
DELETE DELETE
33.3 33.3 16.0
24.0 24.0 7.7
33.3 33.3
0
.0
•
•
9
•
8
8
9
0
.0
•
•
•
5
6
2
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
816
279.
2606.
0
0
1197.9
620.
436.
1.
4100.
8.
1405.
791.
20.
1
0
0
0
4
9
8
0
494.0
2577.9
1169.8
753.7
484.0
1.5
4600.0
9.0
13.9
9.9
464.0
53
2168
924
310
289
0
2695
8
86
.0
.1
.9
.0
.8
.5
FOR 3/25/70
OD CL2
DELETE DELETE
33.3 33.3
4.3
30.0
903,
595,
24,
.9
.6
.0
.0 3600.0
.4
.0
IN FILE RECORD 224 DATA
PF
TF1
TF2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
1
28
599
2338
965
288
255
0
4100
9
22
13
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
1
0
0
8
7
0
7
5
0
2
5
1
SLUDGE-SETT
33.
24.
33.
25.
225.
2373.
957.
599.
507.
2.
3600.
8.
1.
1264.
811.
15.
3
0
3
0
0
0
7
9
7
0
0
4
1
0
7
0
33.3
24.0
33.3
4.8
28.0
228.0
2368.0
1024.8
584.1
367.9
1.5
3500.0
8.6
245.0
AL
DELETE
16
7
1
16
70
2105
811
532
.0
.7
.2
.0
.0
.1
.9
.2
419.8
0
.0
2910.0
8
1
.0
.2
78.0
8,
121
FOR
.0
.0
121.0
2138.0
836.8
440.0
339.9
0.5
3100.0
7.9
1455.9
8*9*9
50.0
3/27/70
00
CL2
DELETE DELETE
33
4
30
7
17
5759
3159
330
600O
7
7
76
.3
.3
.0
.7
.0
.8
.2
.0
.0
.8
.7
.0
13.3
76.0
2109.0
969.9
352.1
320.4
0.0
3200.0
7.9
6.5
7.6
1271.9
848.2
25.0
-------
SHEET 57
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWQA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
M
M
H
DAY
819 IN FILE RECORD 225 DATA
PF TF1 TF2 AL
FOR
OD
3/30/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
S6TT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
0.5
31.0
614.0
2369.9
1004.8
564.5
364.3
0.5
3980.0
9.3
28.4
6.4
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
33.
24.
33.
23.
264.
2369.
1020.
560.
391.
1.
3720.
8.
17.
5.
0.
80911.
35.
3
0
3
0
0
9
0
3
8
5
0
4
8
7
3
9
0
822 IN FILE
PF
TF1
33
24
33
6
27
255
2342
986
544
364
2
4250
8
247
.3
.0
.3
.2
.0
.0
.0
.9
.4
.3
.0
.0
.7
.0
RECORD
TF2
16.
7.
1.
17.
85.
2100.
837.
244.
0.
2695.
7.
1.
70.
0
7
7
0
0
0
9
1
0
0
7
8
0
227 DATA
AL
33.
4.
30.
7.
17.
1291.
799.
40.
3100.
8.
7.
84.
FOR
OD
3
3
0
8
0
5
4
0
0
2
7
0
33
84
1997
755
2219
235
0
3100
8
1492
820
45
.3
.0
.9
.8
.8
.5
.0
.0
.2
.3
.1
.0
4/ 2/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT .
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
361.0
2238. 9
1025.8
548.0
259.9
0.5
3850.0
9.3
59.2
26.1
SLUDGE-SETT
33.
24.
33.
2295.
1091.
568.
400.
4.
3500.
8.
21664.
6007.
200.
3
0
3
33
24
33
314
0 2174
9
2
3
5
0
2
4
5
0
1014
608
375
2
3750
8
299
.3
.0
.3
.0
.9
.8
.5
.9
.5
.0
.5
.0
16.
7.
49.
1943.
798.
216.
0.
2200.
7.
18.
6.
47.
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
7
0
0
33.
4.
30.
744.
615.
18.
3850.
7.
88.
3
3
0
0
8
0
0
7
0
33
88
1952
744
208
0
2850
7
4400
2387
100
.3
.0
.9
.8
.1
.0
.0
.7
.0
.4
.0
DAY
821 IN FILE RECORD 226 DATA
PF TF1 TF2 AL
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
1.0
31.0
703.0
2664.0
1326.9
6*4.0
324.0
0.1
4250.0
9.4
29.9
7.2
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
33.3
24.0
33.3
25.0
333.0
2541.9
1159.8
655.5
171.4
2.0
4100.0
8.4
0.5
1119.9
607.8
20.0
833 IN FILE
PF
435.0
2648.0
1108.9
648.1
407.7
0.5
4250.0
9.2
27.0
9.9
SLUDGE-SETT
TF1
33.3
24.0
33.3
244.0
2345.1
868.8
499.8
320.4
2.5
3400.0
8.1
9.9
7.3
1779.7
20.0
33.3
24.0
33.3
5.2
28.0
358.0
2458.0
1189.9
523.6
251.4
1.2
4250.0
8.9
16.9
6.6
367.0
RECORD
TF2
33.3
24.0
33.3
304.0
2467.0
949.8
932.0
DELETE
16.0
7.7
1.2
17.0
70.0
2290.9
1071.7
91.5
67.7
0.1
2910.0
8.4
1.2
79.0
228 DATA
AL
DELETE
16.0
7.7
40.0
1893.0
614.8
172.1
751.9
1.5
2780.0
8.6
338.0
0.2
2150.0
8.0
16.0
FOR 4/ 1/70
00 CL2
DELETE DELETE
33.3
4.3
30.0
7.9
19.0
679.9
267.8
12.0
3500.0
8.1
• .0
111.0
33.3
111.0
2129.9
917.8
291.7
147.6
0.1
2910.0
7.8
2319.9
931.9
60.0
FOR 4/13/70
OO
33.3
4.3
30.0
844.1
507.7
25.0
3005.0
7.8
123.0
CL2
33.3
123.0
1791.0
589.9
319.8
219.7
4.5
2480.0
7.7
560.3
212.3
20.0
-------
SHEET 58
w
H
Ui
00
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FHOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 835 IN FILE RECORD 229 DATA
PF TF1 TF2 AL
FOR
OD
4/15/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GWt
D.O. 4
TEMP - C 31
BOOS 854
TS 2380
VTS 1120
SS 599
VSS 291
SETT SOL 3
COLOR 4100
PH 9
NITROGEN 5
PHOSPHOR 10
DO-CONT.
SS-COMT.
VSS-COMT
SET-80O
SlMtE-SETT
DAY 037
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.9
.7
.5
.0
.3
.3
.7
33
24
33
27
284
2436
995
572
328
3
3980
8
0
2955
1439
30
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.9
.0
.5
.3
.1
.0
.3
.6
.9
.5
.0
33
24
33
4
27
389
.3
.0
.3
.5
.0
.0
2154.9
993
380
192
1
3005
a
17
9
358
.0
.2
.2
.2
.0
.6
.9
.6
.0
16
7
2
20
73
2129
852
283
203
0
2600
7
2
.0
.7
.7
.0
.0
.9
.8
.8
.8
.1
.0
.8
.7
IN FILE RECORD 231 DATA
PF
TF1
TF2
AL
33
4
30
6
20
1903
.3
.3
.0
.8
.0
.6
1023.4
80
8500
7
6
125
FOR
.0
.0
.6
.9
.0
33
125
2050
377
339
192
3
3200
7
787
436
20
.3
.0
.0
.8
.9
.2
.5
.0
.9
.9
.3
.0
4/17X70
OD
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECV-GPM
D.O. 0
TEMP - C 37
BOOS 674
TS 2796
VTS 1300
SS 552
VSS 380
SETT SOL 0
COLOR 5180
PH 9
NITROGEN 19
.2
.0
.0
.9
.0
.3
.1
.2
.0
.5
.7
33
24
33
30
324
2835
1325
739
468
7
4100
8
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.9
.8
.7
.1
.0
.0
.1
33
24
33
4
33
389
2687
1196
599
387
1
4310
8
.3
.0
.3
.8
.0
.0
.9
.6
.9
.5
.5
.0
.7
16
7
0
21
140
2115
771
288
236
0
3100
8
.0
.7
.2
.0
.0
.9
.8
.0
.1
.4
33
4
30
3
23
1768
988
98
.0 4250
.0
7
.3
.3
.0
.7
.0
.1
.0
.0
.0
.6
PHOSPHOR 9.3
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
SLUDGE-SETT
0
1311
779
10
.6
.6
.3
.0
419
.0
0
74
.2
.0
4
113
.0
.0
33
113
2108
846
252
172
4
3720
7
1
6
4487
2415
180
.3
.0
.9
.7
.0
.1
.0
.0
.7
.5
.6
.9
.3
.0
DAY
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BO*
836
PF
4.
31.
644.
IN FILE RECORD 230 DATA
TF1 TF2 AL
DELETE
33.3 33.3 16.0
24.0 24.0 7.7
33.3 33.3
0
0
0
2669.9
1210.
488.
35*.
0..
8
2
4
5
5000.0
9.
22.
0.
3
0
9
SLUDGE-SETT
DAY
840
28.
290.
1651.
125.
2.
3600.
8.
0.
2400.
13*9.
25.
0
0
9
8
2
0
3
*
4
9
0
4.
29.
704.
2579.
1129.
296.
1*7.
1.
4600.
8.
434.
1
0
0
9
7
0
8
3
0
7
0
1
20
63
.1
.0
.0
re*. 4/16 /re
0*) C12
3J.3 33.3
«•*
30.*
T.T
21.*
2023.0
761
280
236
0
2780
0
29
7
1
79
.0
.1
.1
.1
.0
.1
.2
.4
.1
.0
IN FILE RECORD 232 DATA
PF
TF1
TFt
1543
900
.§
.0
09.*
30t*
7
7
.0
.0
.7
230.0
2023.0
751.9
44*. 0
5.1
3500.0
7.7
•M.3
917.4
23***
FOM
M.a
4/90/70
AL 00)
0.2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
OEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
0.
34.
734.
2613.
1261.
452.
203.
0.
5180.
9.
1.
5.
2
0
0
0
8
2
8
5
0
3
,6
2
33.
24.
33.
27.
314.
2203.
984.
476.
280.
2.
3850.
8.
2.
3.
0.
3
0
3
0
0
9
7
0
1
5
0
0
1
9
6
33.
24.
33.
5.
32.
387.
2399.
1130.
440.
208.
0.
4600.
3
0
3
2
0
0
9
8
0
1
5
0
8.6
16
7
0
21
132
2245
953
596
360
0
3720
7
.0
.7
.4
.0
.0
.0
.9
.3
.0
.0
33
4
30
4
21
3592
107*
80
.3
.3
.0
.9
.0
.5
.0
.0
.014100.8
.8
0.4
7
5
.7
.0
1548.4
SLUDGE-SETT
728.
10,
,0
,0
434.
,0
138.0
3».3
78.0
2188.1
904.7
328.3
160.5
0.2
4600 .O
7.7
6027.8
3147.7
78.0
300.0
-------
SHEET 59
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FHOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
ffi
M
M
H
Ul
VO
DAY 8*2 IN FILE RECORD 233 DATA FOR 4/22/70
PF TF1 TF2 AL 00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DCPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
0.0.
TEMP - C
SOD 5
TS
VTS
ss
vss
SETT SOL
COtOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
0
33
497
2534
.8
.0
.0
.9
1169.8
488
295
0
3600
9
18
7
.2
.9
.2
.0
.0
.8
.9
SLUDGE-SETT
33
24
33
28
244
2401
961
332
1
3850
8
0
916
267
10
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.8
.7
.0
.6
.0
.1
.6
.1
.8
.0
33
24
33
4
29
359
2584
1026
404
283
1
3600
8
18
6
346
.3
.0
.3
.8
.0
.0
.0
.9
.0
.8
.0
.0
.6
.1
.0
.0
16
7
0
21
112
2257
924
455
395
0
3200
7
0
109
.0
.7
.4
.0
.0
.0
.9
.9
.4
.3
33.
4.
30.
5.
21.
4440.
2336.
150.
.018200.
.9
.4
.0
7.
5.
52.
3
3
0
3
0
3
0
0
0
7
4
0
33.3
52.0
1841.8
689.9
223.9
164.1
0.0
3400.0
7.7
1304.3
731.7
70.0
DAY 844 IN FILE RECORD 235 DATA FOR 4/24/70
PF TF1 TF2 AL 00 CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
0
32
614
2624
1360
664
483
0
4310
8
1
9
.3
.0
.0
.0
.8
.0
.9
.5
.0
.6
.3
.4
SLUDGE-SETT
33
24
33
27
324
2357
1047
535
271
2
3600
7
0
535
20
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.9
.8
.8
.5
.7
.0
.6
.6
.8
.0
33
24
33
5
28
434
2559
1212
892
591
3
3500
8
259
.3
.0
.3
.2
.0
.0
.9
.9
.3
.9
.5
.0
.0
.0
16
7
0
22
126
2327
1096
608
392
0
3300
7
0
86
.0
.7
.5
.0
.0
.8
.8
.5
.4
.5
.0
.6
.5
.0
33.
4.
30.
3.
22.
1159.
799.
63.
3850.
7.
3.
59.
3
3
0
8
0
6
4
0
0
3
9
0
33.3
59.0
1994.0
741.7
364.3
172.0
0.6
3500.0
7.5
1.0
6.1
3376.4
1944.5
140.0
DAY
FEEO-GPM
DEPTH-f T
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOD
843 IN FILE
PF TF1
33.3
24.0
33.3
0.
33.
529.
2883.
1442.
540.
380.
1.
5180.
8.
11.
9.
1
0
0
9
8
1
2
0
0
7
4
4
SLUOGE-SETT
DAY
847
PF
31.
235.
2594.
1215.
548.
380.
2.
3300.
8.
0.
2348.
1363.
10.
0
0
9
7
0
2
7
0
0
6
0
9
0
IN FILE
TF1
RECORD 234 DATA FOR 4/23/70
TF2 AL OD C12
DELETE DfttTl
33.3 16.0 33.3 33.3
24.0 7.7 4.3
33.3 30.0
3
31
345
2*71
1233
599
404
3
3005
»
318
.2
.0
.0
.0
.7
.9
.0
.1
.0
.2
.0
RECORD
TF2
0
22
102
2451
1074
559
415
1
2910
7
29
8
0
78
.3
.0
.0
.O
.0
.6
.6
.5
.0
.6
.8
.2
.4
.0
236 DATA
AL
3
22
195
4
300S
7
4
5*
FOR
.9
.0
.9
.0
.0
.5
.0
.0
50.0
2043.1
873.8
24 •. 4
2.5
2850.0
7.4
4/27/70
00
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BOD5
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BCD
0.
35.
570.
2709.
1443.
552.
352.
0.
4600.
8.
2
0
0
9
8
3
1
6
0
9
SLUDGE-SETT
33.
24.
33.
32.
285.
2513.
3
0
3
0
0
1
1126.8
563.
363.
3.
4100.
8.
0.
6135.
3279.
20.
9
7
0
0
0
6
8
6
0
33
24
33
5
33
450
2610
1196
708
488
3
4150
8
362
.3
.0
.3
.0
.0
.0
.0
.6
.0
.2
.5
.0
.0
.0
16
7
0
23
139
2581
1071
1096
668
5
4200
7
0
97
.0
.7
.4
.0
.0
.9
.7
.1
.2
.5
.0
.7
.4
.0
33
4
30
3
23
248
5
3400
7
3
91
.3
.3
.0
.8
.0
.4
.0
.0
.6
.9
.0
CL2
DELETE
33.3
91.0
2071.9
920.9
260.0
244.1
3.0
3720.0
7.5
6079.7
3199.7
90.0
-------
SHEET 60
LISTING OF INDIVIDUAL DATA BY DATE WITH EDITED DELETIONS INDICATED
(MEAD-FWOA PROJECT ON BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT)
DAY 849 IN FILE RECORD 237 DATA FOR
PF TF1 TF2 AL OD
4/29/70
CL2
DELETE
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPM
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
SS
VSS
SETT SOL
COLOR
PH
NITROGEN
PHOSPHOR
DO-CONT.
SS-CONT.
VSS-CONT
SET-BOO
824
2547
1210
79
40
0
.0
.9
.0
.9
.2
.1
4600.0
9
.5
SLUDGE-SETT
33.
24.
33.
244.
2415.
1176.
280.
263.
2.
3720.
8.
1004.
595.
20.
3
0
3
0
0
B
1
6
5
0
3
0
6
0
33.
24.
33.
464.
2608.
1191.
671.
528.
4.
4310.
8.
449.
3
0
3
0
0
8
9
5
0
0
6
0
16
7
0
24
108
2203
886
360
231
0
3500
8
0
.0
.7
.4
.0
.0
.9
.e
.1
.9
.7
.0
.0
.4
96.0
33.
4.
30.
1471.
852.
80.
9500.
7.
45.
3
3
0
5
0
0
0
9
0
33.3
45.0
0.2
3500.0
7.6
911.8
579.7
30.0
DAY 850 IN FILE RECORD 238 DATA FOR */»0/70
FEED-GPM
DEPTH-FT
RECY-GPH
D.O.
TEMP - C
BODS
TS
VTS
-------
1
Accession Number
w
5
2
Subject Field & Group
SELECTED WATER RESOURCES ABSTRACTS
INPUT TRANSACTION FORM
Organization
The Mead Corporation, Central Research Laboratories
Title
Multi-System Biological Treatment of Bleached Kraft Effluents
10
Authors)
16
Project Designation
12040 EMI
21
Note
22
Citation
23
Descriptors (Starred First)
Trickling Filters, Aerated Lagoon, Oxidation Ditch, Sludge Return,
BOD Removal, Pulp and Paper Industry
25
Identifiers (Starred First)
27
Abstract ^ multi-unit pilot plant was used to study the biological treatment of
Integrated kraft pulp and paper effluents after conventional primary clarification. The
biological units included two high-rate trickling filters packed with PVC media, an
oxidation ditch with brush-type aeration, and a lined earthen lagoon with mechanical
surface aeration. Simultaneous series and parallel operation of the four biological
systems was possible. The combinations using normal strength effluent included: (a) Trickling
filters in series, (b) Trickling filter to aerated lagoon, (c) Oxidation ditch to aerated
lagoon, and (d) Oxidation ditch to trickling filter. Black liquor was added to the clarified
effluent in order to elevate the 6005 level and the following combinations were tested:
(a) Trickling filter to oxidation ditch to trickling filter, (b) Trickling filter to
aerated lagoon, and (c) Trickling filters in series followed by oxidation ditch. The best
efficiencies were obtained on the pilot oxidation ditch when it was run with clarification
and sludge return as the extended aeration process. BOD^ removals as high as 94 percent
were obtained. The trickling filter with sludge recycle performed better than the
conventional trickling filter. BOD5 removals of 60 to 70 percent were obtained. This
report was submitted in fulfillment of Grant No. WPRIh-55 (120AO-EMT) between the
Environmental Protection Agency and The Mead Corporation.
Abstractor
Karl Ayers
Institution
The Mead Corporation
WR:'O2 (REV. JULY 1969)
WRSIC
SEND WITH COPY OF DOCUMENT, TO: WATER RESOURCES SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20240
* GPO: 1 970-389-930
------- |