FINAL GRAFT
               United States                                    FPAQ-CIN-G095
               Env.ronmental Protection                              ..,,«„«
               Agency                                       April, 1990
&EPA       Research and
               Development
               HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL  EFFECTS DOCUMENT
               FOR 1.1.2-TRICHLORO-1,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE
               Prepared for
               OFFICE OF SOLID WASTE AND
               EMERGENCY RESPONSE
               Prepared by

               Environmental Criteria and Assessment Office
               Office of Health and Environmental Assessment
               U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
               Cincinnati,  OH  45268
                           DRAFT: 00 NOT CITE OR QUOTE
                                   NOTICE
           This document 1s a preliminary draft. It has not been formally released
         iv the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency  and should not at this stage be
         •onstrued to represent Agency policy.  It Is being  circulated for comments
         in Us technical accuracy and policy  Implications.

-------
                                  DISCLAIMER

    This report  Is  an external draft  for  review purposes only  and  does  not
constitute  Agency  policy.   Mention of  trade  names  or  commercial  products
does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                       11

-------
                                   PKtCAtt


    Health and  Environmental  Effects  Documents (HEEOs) are prepared  for  the
Office of Solid Waste  and Emergency  Response  (OSUER).  This  document series
Is Intended to support listings under  the  Resource  Conservation  and  Recovery
Act (RCRA) as  well  as to  provide health-related limits and  goals for  emer-
gency and  remedial  actions under  the Comprehensive  Environmental Response,
Compensation   and  Liability  Act  (CERCLA).   Both  published  literature  and
Information obtained  for  Agency Program Office  files are evaluated  as  they
pertain to potential human health, aquatic  life  and environmental  effects of
hazardous waste constituents.   The  literature searched for  In  this  document
and  the  dates  searched  are  Included In  "Appendix:  Literature  Searched."
Literature search material  Is current up  to 8 months previous  to the  final
draft date  listed  on  the front  cover.   Final  draft document  dates  (front
cover) reflect the date the document  Is sent to the Program Officer (OSUER).

    Several  quantitative  estimates  are  presented  provided  sufficient  data
are available.  For systemic  toxicants,  these  Include Reference  doses (RfDs)
for  chronic   and  subchronlc  exposures  for  both  the Inhalation  and  oral
exposures.   The subchronlc  or  partial  lifetime RfO Is   an  estimate of  an
exposure  level  that  would not  be expected to  cause adverse  effects  when
exposure  occurs  during a  limited time  Interval  I.e.. for an  Interval  that
does  not  constitute  a significant portion  of  the Hfespan.  This   type of
exposure  estimate  has not been extensively used,  or rigorously  defined as
previous risk assessment  efforts  have  focused  primarily  on lifetime  exposure
scenarios.   Animal  data   used  for  subchronlc  estimates  generally  reflect
exposure  durations  of 30-90  days.  The general methodology  for  estimating
subchronlc RfOs Is  the same  as  traditionally employed for chronic estimates.
except that subchronlc data are utilized when available.

    In the case of  suspected carcinogens, a carcinogenic  potency factor, or
q-|*  (U.S.  EPA,  1980),  Is provided.   These  potency estimates  are  derived
for  both  oral  and  Inhalation  exposures where possible.    In  addition,  unit
risk  estimates  for  air and drinking water  are presented  based on Inhalation
and oral  data,  respectively.  An  RfO may also be derived  for the noncarclno-
genlc health effects of compounds that are also carcinogenic.

    Reportable  quantities  (RQs) based on  both  chronic toxlclty and  cardno-
genlclty are  derived.  The RQ Is  used to determine  the quantity of a hazard-
ous  substance  for which  notification  Is required  In  the  event  of a release
as  specified under  the  Comprehensive  Environmental  Response.  Compensation
and  Liability  Act  (CERCLA).   These  two RQs (chronic toxlclty  and  cardno-
genlclty) represent two  of six scores developed  (the remaining four reflect
IgnltabllUy,  reactivity, aquatic toxlclty, and acute  mammalian toxlclty).
Chemical-specific RQs  reflect the lowest of these six primary criteria.  The
methodology  for  chronic  toxlclty  and cancer  Based RQs are  defined  1n U.S.
EPA.  1984 and 1986a, respectively.
                                      111

-------
                              EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane   Is  a  colorless,  volatile  liquid
with a  sweet odor  (Hawley.  1981;  Verschueren,  1983).   1,1,2-Trlchloro-l,2,2-
trlfluoroethane  Is  manufactured by  reacting  hexachloroethane with  hydrogen
fluoride  In  the  presence  of  a  catalyst  (Smart,  1980).   The  extent  of
chlorine  atom  replacement  Is  controlled  by  varying  the concentration  of
hydrogen fluoride and the reaction time and temperature.   No  production  data
are available.   It Is used primarily  as a  solvent (Borchers et al..  1987).
    The  key factors affecting  the fate of  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane  In  the  environment  are  Us very high  vapor  pressure, combined  with
Us  low  solubility  In   water  and  chemical  Inertness.   The  Henry's  Law
constant for 1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane calculated  from  Us  vapor
pressure,  330  mm  Hg  at  2S*C  (Parrlsh.  1983).  and  water  solubility, 170
mg/t  (Smart.  1980),  Is  0.48  atm-mVmol.   Therefore,   Us  volatilization
from water  will  be very  rapid,  with the volatilization rate  limited  by Us
diffusion  through  water.  The  half-life  of  1.1,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoro-
ethane  In a  model  river  1 m deep, flowing at 1 m/sec. with a wind of 3 m/sec
1s  estimated to be  4.0   hours  (Thomas,  1982).   Experimental  data  regarding
the  adsorption  of I.l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  to  soil,  sediment
and suspended  solids In  the  water column  were  not located  In the  available
literature,  and  a K   of 426 was estimated  from Us water  solubility  (see
Section  2.1.).  This  moderate  K    Indicates   that  adsorption   to  sediment
and participate  matter  In  the water  column would  not compete  effectively
with volatilization  from water.   Because  of  1i,l ,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane's high  vapor pressure, high Henry's Law  constant  and moderate adsorp-
tion to soil,  1,1,2-trlchloro-l ,2,2-tMfluoroethane  would also  be expected
                                      1v

-------
to volatilize  rapidly from both  dry  and moist soil.  Its  K    of 426 would
Indicate a  moderate  potential for  leaching  Into  groundwater  (Swann et  al..
1983).
    Pertinent  data  regarding the  fate of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l ,2,2-tMfluoro-
ethane  In  water or  soil  as  a result of  mlcroblal  or chemical  reactions  or
Interaction with sunlight were not  located  1n  the available literature cited
In Appendix A.  Under  environmental  conditions,  alkyl fluorides are  likely
to hydrolyze  too  slowly for   this pathway to be significant (Mabey  and Mill.
1978).   Fluorocarbons are  highly  resistant  to  attack  by oxidizing  agents
under  environmental  conditions   (Howard et   al..   1975}.   Lacking  any  UV
absorption  >290 nm  (Hubrlch  and  Stahl.  1980). direct photolysis should  not
be  significant.  While no  Information  was  found concerning  the blodegrada-
tlon   of   1.1.2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane, ' its   rapid   volatilization
would  limit.  If not preclude, blodegradatlon  (Howard et  al..  1975);  there-
fore,  U  Is unlikely that photooxldatlon. hydrolysis  or  blodegradatlon  will
be significant  In water or soil.
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the bloconcentratlon  of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-
trlfluoroethane  In  fish  and  aquatic  organisms  were not  located  In  the
available literature.  The estimated  BCF.  148  (see  Section  2.1.).  Indicates
that  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l.2.2-tr1fluoroethane  should have a low  potential  for
bloconcentratlng In aquatic organisms.
    As  a  result  of  Us   high  volatility.  I.l,2-tr1chloro-l.2.2-tr1fluoro-
ethane  will partition  Into  air.  l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1f1uoroethane  Is
extremely  stable  1n  the  troposphere  (Borchers et  al..  1987);  1t  will  not
directly photolyze or  react with photochemically produced hydroxyl  radicals.
It will  disperse over  the globe and diffuse  slowly  Into the stratosphere,
where  It will  be destroyed by photolysis,  by  short wave-length UV radiation

-------
 and,  to  a  lesser  degree,  by  0{1D)  attack  (Borchers et  al.,  1987).   An
 Intensive   7-year   study   monitored   1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane
 weekly  at  seven locations ranging from  the arctic  to the antarctic regions.
 The  data applied to  a  global mass balance equation  resulted 1n a half-life
 of  48.5 years  {Khalll and Rasmussen,  1988).  Therefore, the  1,1,2-trlchloro-
 1,2.2-trlfluoroethane  released to air  would be expected to accumulate  there.
 Its  concentration In  the atmosphere,  removed  from local  sources,  would be
 fairly  uniform over  the world.   l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane will
 be  removed from the atmosphere  by dry  and wet deposition and will return to
.the  atmosphere  by volatilization.
•i
 •    l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  Is  ubiquitous  1n  the atmosphere.
 It  Is  entirely  derived from anthropogenic  sources.   Its atmospheric lifetime
 Is  extremely long and  almost all the pollutant  released has accumulated In
 the  atmosphere.  As  with all  Inert  chemicals that  are used  as  a solvent.
 refrigerant  or  blowing agent, essentially  all  of the chemical  produced will
 eventually  be  released Into  the  atmosphere.   A 7-year monitoring study con-
 ducted  at  seven remote  sites around the world reported that  concentrations
 of  I,l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  In  the  atmosphere  doubled  1n  the
 last  5  years.   As  of  September  1988,  the background   concentration  of
 I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  ranged   from  40-50   ppt   (Khalll   and
 Rasmussen.  1988).   This  level appears  to Increase  14%  each  year (Borchers et
 al.,  1987).   The  atmospheric  concentration  of  1.1,2-trlchloro-l.2.2-trl-
 fluoroethane  In urban and Industrial areas may be  much higher  as 1,1,2-trl-
 chloro-l,2,2-tr1f1uoroethane Is  used  In consumer  products  and as an  Indus-
 trial  solvent.   The median and  maximum  concentration  of  1,1,2-tr1chloro-
 1,2,2-trlfluoroethane at 15 selected urban and suburban sites  In the  United
 States  was  170 and  4100 ppt.  respectively (Brodzlnsky and Singh,  1982).
                                       v1

-------
  Of  79  air  samples  taken  from  three urban/Industrial areas  of the  United
  States. 19 were >19 ppb  (Plell et al.. 1988).
      Many  consumer products  contain  1.1.2-trlchloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  as.
  a solvent.  The  use  of these products will expose the user and bystanders  to
  1,l,2-tr1chloro-l.2,2-tr1fluoroethane.   Exposure will  be  by  Inhalation  and
  dermal  contact with  the vapor;   It  may  also  be from skin contact  with  the
  liquid  solvent.   In  a  1987 EPA   survey  of  solvents found   In  household
  products,  13%  of  product  categories  had  one  or  more  brands  containing
  1.1,2-tr1ch1oro-1.2.2-tr1f1uoroethane  (Ueststat and  Midwest  Research  Insti-
  tute,  1987).   The products most  likely to contain 1.1,2-trlchloro-l ,2.2-tM-
  fluoroethane  were VCR  cleaners   (71%),  video disk cleaners  (67%).  electric
  shaver  cleaners  (25%)  and specialized aerosol cleaners (25%).  Many  of these
  products  were entirely or almost entirely composed of 1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-
  trlf luoroethane and were  not  labeled as to their contents.
      Since  1.1.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1f1uoroethane  Is   used  primarily  as   a
.  solvent  and   Is  highly  volatile, there  Is a  potential  for  exposure  In  the
  workplace.  Exposure will  be both by Inhalation and  dermal  contact  with the
  vapor  and liquid  solvents.  NIOSH  (1988)  estimated that 134.476  workers.
  Including 50.482  women,  are  exposed  to  1.1.2-trlchlorol.2,2-trlfluoroethane
  In  the  workplace.   In  other NIOSH  surveys,  an air  sample  at  one  company
  contained 0.70 ppm of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane (Chrostek, 1980)
  and personal  air samples  for workers  In another  plant contained I,l.2-tr1-
  chloro-1,2,2-trlfluoroethane  ranging from  0.2-6.7  ppm (Lee  and Parkinson.
  1982).   A worker  died  and others were  overcome while cleaning  out  a large
  vapor  degreaser;  the concentration  of  1.1,2-trlchloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane
  may  have been  as high  as 374,000  ppm  (Anonymous,  1987).   A comprehensive

-------
survey of I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane levels  In occupational atmo-
spheres In France  reported  that  1.5X of the workplaces had  1,1,2-trlchloro-
l.2,2-tr1fluoroethane of which 10%  were between  500 and the TLV  value  (1000
ppm), and 3% had levels  >1000 ppm (Ensmlnger,  1988).
    Results  of  surveys  Indicate  that the  general  population may be  exposed
to  1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  In   drinking  water   derived   from
surface and  underground sources.   1,1,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  has
been found In drinking water  In  the Great  Lakes  basin.  In  a survey In  which
nine raw  and  treated Canadian water  supplies  were sampled  once  during  each
of  three  seasons,  and  a  tenth  plant was  sampled on  5 consecutive  days  In
each  sampling  period  (Otson.  1987),   1-3  samples  contained  >0.1  ug/l  of7
I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trIfluoroethane   In  raw  and   treated  water  and  an
additional 1-11  samples  contained  trace  levels  of  the  pollutant.  It  has
also  been found  1n  groundwater (1.3  wg/l)   near  a  municipal   solid  waste
landfill (Sabel  and Clark. 1984).
    l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  would   tend   to  partition  In  air,
rather than In  soil  and water, because  of  Us high volatility; therefore. If
I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane Is found In food. It  would most likely
result  from   air  Intake  by  a plant  or animal.   1,1,2-Trlchloro-l ,2,2-tM-
fluoroethane  was  found  In  all  eight   samples of mothers'   milk  In  a  pilot
study;  the   levels  were  not  quantified  (PelUzzaM  et   al.,   1982).   The
Infants  of   these  mothers  would therefore  be  exposed  to 1,1,2-tr1chloro-
1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane In their food.
    Pertinent data  regarding the environmental  toxlclty of 1,2,2-tr1chloro-
1.1,2-trlfluoroethane were  not located  In the available  literature cited In
Appendix A.

-------
    Inhalation  experiments  In  humans  with  '"Cl-labeled  1,1,2-trlchloro-
1.2.2-trlfluoroethane  (Morgan  et al..  1972)  Indicate that, although  pulmo-
nary absorption of  1,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1f1uoroethane occurs,  the rate  of
absorption  1s lower  than  that  of  other  chlorinated hydrocarbons  such  as
trlchloroethane.  Dermal  absorption  has also been  shown  to occur In  humans
(Haskell  Laboratory,   1968),  but   data  regarding  gastric  absorption   of
I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane are not available.
    Inhalation  studies  with-  dogs   (Trochlmowlcz   et  al.,  1974)  and  rats
(Carter  et  al..  1970;  Salvolalnen and  Pfaffll. 1980)  Indicate  that  absorbed
I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  Is rapidly distributed by  the  blood  to
various  organs  and  tissues  (Including  the  brain,  liver,  adrenal, heart and
thyroid) and  Is preferentially deposited Into fat.
    Upon  cessation  of  exposure.  1,1.2-tr1ch1oro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  Is
rapidly  cleared  from the  body.   1.1,2-Tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane could
not be  detected  In  the  brain,  liver, heart, adrenal  or  thyroid of rats  24
and 48  hours  after  termination  of a 14-day exposure  regime,  and 1,1,2-trl-
chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane-levels   In   fat  were decreased  by  -80  and  99%
during the same respective periods (Carter  et al..  1970).
    Human data Indicate  that pulmonary  exhalation Is  a significant  excretory
route for  1.1.2-tr1chloro-1.2.2-tr1fluoroethane.   1.1,2-tMchloro-l ,2.2-tM-
fluoroethane  was  detected  In  the  exhaled  air  of  humans   following  dermal
administrations  of   I,l.2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  (Haskell   Labora-
tory. 1968).
    Identifications  have  not been made of In vivo  metabolites  of 1,1,2-trl-
chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane In  animals or  humans.   Based  upon the  demon-
stration of  \n vitro binding of  I.1,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1f1uoroethane  to rat
                                      1x

-------
hepatic  cytochrome  P-450. a  suggestion  has been made  that  1,1,2-trlchloro-
1.2,2-trlfluoroethane  may  be  oxidized   by  enzymes  associated  with  P-450
(Valnlo et al.. 1980). but reaction products have not been Identified.
    Adverse  systemic  effects  In  animals  caused by  long-term exposure (sub-
chronic  or  chronic)  to  vapors  of  I.l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  at
concentrations  <2000  ppm have  not  been  Identified,  but  the  data  base  Is
limited  to  two  rat  studies (81 ohm et  al.,  1985; Trochlmowlcz et al., 1988).
At  concentrations >10,000 ppm. adverse body weight  changes  were observed  In
rats  (Trochlmowlcz  et  al.,  1988).   No  adverse changes  In body,  liver  or
kidney weights,  liver  biochemistry or  urinary catecholamlne metabolites were
observed  In  rats exposed  to  I,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1f1uoroethane vapors  at
concentrations  of  200  ppm  for  84  days  (81 ohm  et  al.,   1985).   Chronic
exposure  (24 months)  of rats to 1,1.2-trlchloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane vapors
'at  2000  ppm caused no  adverse changes 1n  blood and urine chemical  Indices.
body  and  organ  weights  or   la  the histology  of  major  organs  and  tissues
(Trochlmowlcz et  al..  1988).  The same  endpolnts were  unaffected by higher
chronic exposure  levels,  except  for  body weight gain, which  was  decreased In
both  sexes  of  rats  exposed  to  20,000   ppm  and In  female  rats  exposed  to
10,000 ppm.
    No  adverse  effects  were Identified  In  shorter-term  studies  of dogs.
guinea  pigs  and  rats  exposed to  vapors  of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane at  concentrations  of  5100  ppm  for -4 weeks  (Steinberg  et  al.. 1969).
Carter et  al. (1970)  also reported  no adverse  effects  In Inhalation  studies
of  monkeys,  dogs, mice  and rats  continuously  exposed  to  2000 ppm for  14 days.
    The    only    report   of    I.l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane-1nduced
systemic  effects  other  than  body weight  changes In animals  exposed  to low to
moderate  concentrations comes from a 2-week Inhalation  study of  rats  (Valnlo

-------
et  al.,  1980).   Light microscopy  revealed  11p1d accumulation and  electron
microscopy  revealed changes  In  the  smooth  endoplasmlc  retlculum  In  liver
cells from  rats  exposed  to  concentrations  of 1000 or 2000 ppm.  Changes were
also noted  In  enzymlc  activities  and  reduced glutathlone levels In the liver
of  rats exposed  to  2000 ppm (Valnlo et al.,  1980).
    Adverse  systemic effects of  long-term  exposure  of  humans to  vapors  of
1,l.2-tr1chloro-l.2.2-tr1fluoroethane  have  not  been  clearly  Identified.   In
a  comparison  of chronically  exposed human workers with  unexposed workers
(Imbus and  Adklns,  1972),  no  adverse effects were noted In physical examina-
tions  of  workers who  worked  an average 2.8  years  In  rooms  In which average
concentrations  of 1,l.2-tr1ch1oro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  were  estimated to  be
699 ppm.   Eplderalologlcal  and  case-report  studies  suggest,  however,  that
long-term   occupational  exposure   to  vapors  of   I.l,2-tr1chloro-l.2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane  may  cause neuropsychologlcal   effects  (Rasmussen and Sabroe,
1986;  Rasmussen  et al..  1988J or  neuropathy  (Raffl  and Vlolante.  1981).
Further  Information   Is  needed   to   substantiate   the  suggestions  of  the
epldemlologlcal  and case-report studies.
                     •
    Acute  exposures (<2  hours)  to moderate concentrations   (>2500  ppm)  of
                                               •
I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane   vapors  altered  the  performance  of
volunteers  In   psychophyslologlcal   tests   (Stopps   and  Mclaughlin,  1967).
Exposure  of  human   volunteers  to  lower  concentrations  (<1QOO  ppm)   for  a
longer  duration  (6  hours/day.  5  days/week  for  2  weeks)   did   not  cause
treatment-related changes  In performance  In psychophyslologlcal  tests or  In
physical examinations  (Relnhardt et al., 1971b);
    The acute lethality of 1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane 1s low when
administered  to animals by either oral or  Inhalation  routes.  An  oral LD50
of  43 g/kg was  determined  for  rats  (Michaelson  and Huntsman.  1964),  but
                                      x1

-------
   rabbits  appeared more  susceptible.   Half of  a  group of  eight  rabbits  died
   after  receiving  one  to  four  doses  of  5  g/kg/day  (Busey  et  al.,  1967).
   Two-hour  LC5Q  values  of  95,000,  120,000  and  110,000  ppm  were determined
   for   Inhalation  exposures  of  mice,  guinea  pigs  and   rats,   respectively
   (Desollle et al.,1968).
      Acute  exposures  to moderate  to high  concentrations  of  1,1,2-trlchloro-
   1,2,2-trlfluoroethane  caused  CNS effects  In  two animal  species.  Reversible
   CNS   effects   were   seen  In  dogs  and   rats  given  6-hour  exposures  to
   11,000-13,000  ppm (Steinberg et  al., 1969),  and an  EC5Q  value  of  28,000
   ppm was  determined  for CNS effects  In rats  given I0-m1nute  exposures (.Clark
   and  Tlnston,   1982).   The mechanistic  connection between  these  CNS effects
   and  the  observation  of minor biochemical  effects In brain preparations from
   rats  exposed  to  concentrations  <2000  ppm  for  2  weeks   (Savolalnen  and
   Pfaffll, 1980) currently  Is unclear.
      Accidental  and  voluntary  human  exposures  to  high  concentrations  of
.   I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  vapors  caused  sudden  death  generally
   thought  to be  due  to  cardiac  arrest  (Hay  and  Blotzer,  1984;  Relnhardt et
   al..  1971a.  1973;  Zakharl and  Avlado. 1982).   This  hypothesis  has received
   support  from  animal   studies  In  which  acute  exposures  (5-10  minutes)  to
   moderate  to  high  concentrations  caused  adverse cardiac  effects.   Cardiac
   sensltlzatlon  to eplnephrlne-lnduced  arrhythmias  was observed   In  dogs  at
   concentrations >5000 ppm  (Relnhardt  et al. 1973) and  In anesthetized mice at
   concentrations  >50,000 ppm  (Avlado  and  BeleJ,  1974).  An  EC.-  for cardiac
   sensltlzatlon  of 10,000  ppm  was determined  for 5-m1nute  exposures of dogs
   (Clark   and   Tlnston,   1973).   In  anesthetized  rhesus  monkeys,  5-mlnute
   exposures  to  concentrations  >25,000  ppm   caused  arrhythmias,  myocardlal
   depressions and  tachycardia,  without administration of exogenous  eplnephrlne
   (BeleJ et al., 1974).

-------
    Acute  5-minute  exposures  to  vapors of  I.l,2-tr1chloro-l.2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane  at  concentrations  >25,000  ppm  altered  pulmonary  function In  rhesus
monkeys  (Avlado  and  Smith,  1975).   In. vitro  experiments  with  excised  rat
lungs  (Alarle  et al..  1975) Indicated  that  this effect may  Involve  Inter-
action  of  I,1.2-tr1ch1oro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane with  surfactant  on  the Inner
alveolar surface.
    Perltlnent data  regarding  the  systemic  toxldty of chronic or  subchronlc
exposure  to orally  administered  1,1,2-trlch1oro-l,2t2-tr1f1uoroethane  were
not located In the available literature cited In Appendix A.
    Data  regarding  the  carclnogenlclty of  I.l,2-tr1chloro-l.2,2-tr1flupro-
ethane  are limited  to a  2-year Inhalation study  In  which  rats  were  exposed
to  concentrations of  0,   2000,  10,000 or  20,000 ppm  (Troch1mow1cz et  al.,
1988).   No treatment-related  Increases In  tumor  Incidences  were  reported.
1.1,2-tr1ch1oro-l.2,2-tr1fluoroethane   was   not   mutagenlc   In   assays   for
dominant  lethal  mutations In mice  (Epstein et  al.,  1972)  nor In  assays for
reverse mutations  In Salmonella typhlmurlura (Simmon et al., 1977; Longstaff,
1988; Hahurln and Bernstein. 1988).
    The  U.S.  EPA  (1983)   summarized  three  unpublished studies  (Ward,  1983;
Hazelton  Laboratories.  1967a,b),   which  contain  the only  available  data
regarding  the  teratogenldty  and  other reproductive  effects of  1,1,2-trl-
chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane.   The  summarized  data Indicate  that 1,1,2-tM-
chloro-1,2,2-tMfluoroethane  was  not  teratogenlc  In rats  exposed   to  air
containing <25,000  ppn on days 6-15 of gestation (Hard,  1983), but  conclu-
sions  were  precluded  1n rabbit  studies  (Hazelton  Laboratories.  1967a,b)
  •
because of marked maternal toxlclty and  Inadequate numbers of animals.
    l,l.2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  Is  assigned to  EPA Group  0  (not
classifiable  as   to  carclnogenlclty  to humans)  because  no  human data  are

-------
available  and  negative data  are available  for only  one  animal species  —
rats (Trochlmowlcz et  a!..  1988).   Therefore,  neither  quantitative  estimates
of cancer risks (q,*s) nor a cancer-based RQ were derived.
    An RfO  of  27 mg/ma  for chronic  Inhalation exposure was derived  from a
LOAEL  of  2000 ppm,  6 hours/day, 5 days/week  for  decreased body  weight  In
female rats  relative  to  controls  In  the  24-month study by  Trochlmowlcz  et
al. (1988).  Confidence  In  the Inhalation RfO  Is  medium reflecting the high
quality  of  the  key   study  but  the  Inadequacy  of  supporting  Information
regarding  the  reproductive  and  teratogenlc  effects  of Inhaled  1,1,2-trl-
ch1oro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane.   Because of  a  limited data base for subchronlc
Inhalation exposure,  the  chronic  Inhalation RfO was also adopted  as the RfD
for subchronlc exposure.
    An  oral  RfD of   3  mg/kg/day  for  either  subchronlc   or  chronic  oral
exposure was derived  from the  chronic Inhalation  RfO.  because  of  a lack of
data   regarding  oral  exposures   to  1.1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane.
Confidence  In  the  oral  RfO 1s low because of  the uncertainty  of  route-to-
route .extrapolation.   An  RQ of  5000 based on chronic Inhalation toxlclty was
also derived for decreased  body weights  In female  rats  (Trochlmowlcz et al..
1988).
                                      xlv

-------
                             TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.  INTRODUCTION	     1

    1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER	     1
    1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES 	     1
    1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA	     2
    1.4.   USE DATA	     4
    1.5.   SUMMARY	     4

2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT	     5

    2.1.   AIR	     5
    2.2.   WATER	     6
    2.3.   SOIL	     7
    2.4.   SUMMARY	     8

3.  EXPOSURE	    11

    3.1.   WATER	    11
    3.2.   FOOD	    11
    3.3.   INHALATION	    12
    3.4.   DERMAL	    14
    3.5.   SUMMARY	    15

4.  ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY	    18

    4.1.   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY	    18

           4.1.1.   Acute Toxic Effects on Fauna	    18
           4.1.2.   Chronic Effects on Fauna	    18
           4.1.3.   Effects on Flora	    18
           4.1.4.   Effects on Bacteria 	    18

    4.2.   TERRESTRIAL TOXICOLOGY  	    18

           4.2.1.   Effects on Fauna	    18
           4.2.2.   Effects on Flora	    19

    4.3.   FIELD STUDIES	    19
    4.4.   AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENT	    19
    4.5.   SUMMARY	    19

5.  PHARHACOKINETCS	    20

    5.1.   ABSORPTION	    20
    5.2.   DISTRIBUTION	I	    23
    5.3.   METABOLISM	    25
    5.4.   EXCRETION	    26
    5.5.   SUMMARY	   26
                                     xv

-------
                          TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont.)

                                                                       Page

 6.  EFFECTS	   28

     6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   28

            6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposure 	   28
            6.1.2.   Oral Exposure	   31
            6.1.3.   Other Relevant Information	   31

     6.2.   CARCINOGENICITY	   36

            6.2.1.   Inhalation	   36
            6.2.2.   Oral	   37
            6.2.3.   Other Relevant Information	   37

     6.3.   MUTAGENICITY	   39
     6.4.   DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY 	   39
     6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS 	   41
     6.6.   SUMMARY	   41

 7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS 	   46

     7.1.   HUMAN	:  .  .  .   46
     7.2.   AQUATIC	   47

 8.  RISK ASSESSMENT	   48

     8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY	   48

            8.1.1.   Inhalation	   48
            8.1.2.   Oral	   48
            8.1.3.   Other Routes	   48
            8.1.4.   Weight of Evidence	   48
            8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Estimates 	   49

     8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY	   49

            8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure 	   49
            8.2.2.   Oral Exposure	   52

 9.  REPORTABLE QUANTITIES	   54

     9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY 	   54
     9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY	'.	   54

10.  REFERENCES	   58

APPENDIX A: LITERATURE SEARCHED	   72
APPENDIX B: SUMMARY TABLE FOR 1,1,2-TRICHLORO-l,2,2-TRIFLUOROETHANE.  .   75
APPENDIX C: DOSE/DURATION RESPONSE GRAPH(S) FOR EXPOSURE TO
            1.1,2-TRICHLORO-1,2.2-TRIFLUOROETHANE	    76
                                      xvl

-------
LIST OF TABLES
No.
1-1
5-1
6-1
6-2
9-1
9-2
9-3
Title
Manufacturers of 1 ,1,2-TMchloro-l, 2, 2-tr1f luoroethane \n
the United States as of January, 1987 	
Tissue Concentrations of l.l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoro-
ethane from Rats Exposed to Air Containing 2000 ppm 	
Incidence of Tumors In Crl :C08R Rats Exposed to Vapors of
1.1,2-TMchloro-l. 2. 2-tr1f luoroethane for 24 Months 	
Mutagenlcity Testing of l.l,2-Tr1chloro-1.2,2-Tr1-
fluoroethane 	 	
Inhalation Tox1c1ty Summary for 1,1 ,2-Tr1chloro-l ,2,2-
Tr If luoroethane 	
Inhalation Composite Score for 1 ,1 ,2-Trlchloro-l ,2,2-
Tr 1 f luoroethane 	
1, 1,2-Tr1chloro-l, 2, 2-Trlf luoroethane: Minimum Effective
Dose (MED) and Reoor table Quantity (RO) 	
Page
3
24
38
40
55
56
57
      XV11

-------
                            LIST  OF ABBREVIATIONS

AEL                     Adverse effects level
BCF                     B1oconcentrat1on factor
BUN                     Blood urea nitrogen
CAS                     Chemical Abstract Service
CNS                     Central nervous system
CS                      Composite score
CT                      Computerized tomography
EC5Q                    Concentration effective to SOX of recipients
                        (and all other subscripted concentration levels)
FEL                     Frank effect level
HEC                     Human equivalent concentration
Koc                     Soil sorptlon coefficient standardized
                        with respect to organic carbons
K                       Octanol/water partition coefficient
LC5Q                    Concentration lethal to 50% of recipients
                        (and all other subscripted dose levels)
LD,-                    Dose lethal to 50% of recipients
LOAEL                   Lowest-observed-adverse-effect level
NAOPH                   Nlcotlnamlde adenlne dlnucleotlde phosphate
                        (reduced form)
NOEL                    No-observed-effect level
ppb                     Parts  per  billion
ppm                     Parts  per  million
ppt                     Parts  per  trillion
RfO                     Reference  dose
RNA                     Rlbonuclelc add
RV.                     Dose-rating value
RVe                     Effect-rating value
STEL                    Short-term exposure level
TLV                     Threshold limit value
TWA                     Time-weighted average
UOP                     UMdlne dlphosphate
UV                      Ultraviolet
                                     XV111

-------
                               1.   INTRODUCTION
1.1.   STRUCTURE AND CAS NUMBER
    1,1,2-Trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  Is   the   chemical   name  of   the
compound commonly  known as Freon  113.   Other  synonyms  and trade names  for
this chemical  are  1.1,2-trlchlorotrlfluoroethane.  Freon  TF,  Genetron  113,
R113,  Uncon  Fluorocarbon  113, Arklone  P,  FMgen A,  TR-T  and  trlchlorotrl-
fluoroethane  (Chemllne,  1989).  The  molecular  structure,  molecular  weight,
empirical  formula   and  CAS  Registry number  for  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane are as follows:
Molecular structure:  CC12F-CC1F2
Molecular weight:  187.38
Empirical formula:   CjCI-jFj
CAS Registry number:  76-13-1
1.2.   PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
    l,l,2-Tr1chloro-1,2,2-tr1f1uoroethane  Is  a  colorless, volatile  liquid
(Hawley, 1981).   It has  a sweet  odor  and  Is  noncombustlble  (Hawley,  1981;
Verschueren, 1983).  Selected physical properties are listed below:

   Boiling point:              47.57'C             Smart. 1980
                               46'C                Parrlsh, 1983
   Melting point:              -35'C               Smart, 1980
                               -36-C               Parrlsh, 1983
   Density (g/mt) (250C):      1.565               Smart, 1980
                               1.56354             Parrlsh, 1983
   Vapor pressure
     at 20"C:                  270 mm Hg       .   Verschueren, 1983
     at 25'C:                  330 mm Hg           Parrlsh, 1983
     at 30-C:                  400 mm Hg           Verschueren, 1983
   Vapor density:              6.47                Verschueren, 1983
   Flash point:                not available
0275d                                -1-                               11/15/89

-------
   Water solubility  (2S*C):    0.017 wt %          Smart. 1980
                               0.01664 wt X        Horvath, 1982
   Log Kou:                    3.16                McOuffle. 1981
                               3.29 (estimated)    U.S. EPA. 1987
   Air odor threshold:         45 ppm              Amoore and Hautala, 1983
   Air conversion factor:      1 mg/m3 - 0.13 ppm
                               1 ppm « 7.69 mq/m3

1.3.   PRODUCTION DATA
    l,l,2-Tr1ch1oro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane   1s   manufactured   by   reacting
hexachloroethane with  hydrogen fluoride In the  presence  of  a chromium oxide
or  hallde, ferric chloride or  thorium  tetrafluorlde catalyst (Smart, 1980).
In  this process, the  chlorine atoms.are  successively  replaced  by  fluorine
atoms;  the extent  of replacement Is controlled  by varying the concentration
of  hydrogen  fluoride,   the  reaction  time and  temperature.   The  companies
currently   producing  1.1,2-trlchloro-l,2.2-trIfluoroethane  1n  the  United
States  are  shown   In  Table  .1-1.   No  production  data  are  available.   The
amount  of  1,1,2-trlchloro-1,2,2-trlfluoroethane  emitted  Into the atmosphere
annually has  Increased  sharply since  It was first  used commercially around
1960;  the   annual  emission  leveled  off  In  1980  and  was  estimated as  97
klloton/year  (88 million kg/year) during  1980-1983  (Borchers et al.. 1987).
This  results   In  an  annual   Increase  of  -15X  per  year.   By  applying  the
results  of 7  years  of  monitoring  data  of 1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2.2-trlfluoro-
ethane   to a   mass  balance   model,   another   Investigator  estimated  that
emissions  over  the  time  period  September   1982-September  1988  were  100
million  kg/year and  were  Increasing exponentially at 5X per year (Khalll and
Rasmussen, 1988).
0275d                               -2-                              11/15/89

-------
                                  TABLE 1-1
        Manufacturers of l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane In the
                     United States as  of January. 1987*
                  Manufacturer
                   Location
        Allied  Signal.  Inc.
        E.I.  du Pont  de Nemours  & Co..  Inc.
        Penwalt Corporation
              Baton Rouge. LA
              Corpus Chrlstl, TX
              Montague. MI
              NA
•Source:  SRI.  1988;  USITC.  1988
NA » Not  available
0275d
-3-
                                                                     11/15/89

-------
1.4.   USE DATA
    Since   1960,   1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1Muoroethane    has   been   used
primarily as  a  solvent,  although 1t can also be used as a  blowing agent and
refrigerant  (Borchers  et al.,   1987).   Its use as  a  dry  cleaning agent  Is
limited because of Its expense (ParMsh, 1983).
1.5.   SUMMARY
    l,l.2-Tr1chloro-l.2.2-tr1fluoroethane  Is a colorless,  volatile  liquid
with  a  sweet odor (Hawley.  1981; Verschueren,  1983).  1,1,2-TMchloro-l,2,2-
tMfluoroethane  1s manufactured  by reacting hexachloroethane with  hydrogen
fluoride  In  the  presence   of   a   catalyst  (Smart.  1980).   The  extent   of
chlorine  atom  replacement   1s  controlled  by   varying  the  concentration   of
hydrogen  fluoride and  the reaction  time and temperature.   No  production data
are available.   It Is used primarily as a solvent (Borchers et al.. 1987).
0275d                               -4-                              11/15/89

-------
                    2.  ENVIRONMENTAL FATE AND TRANSPORT
2.1.   AIR
    l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  Is  extremely  stable  In the  tropo-
sphere  (Borchers  et al.,  1987).   It  does not  adsorb UV  radiation >290  nm
(Hubrlch and  Stahl,  1980)  and  It will  not directly photolyze  (Haklde  et  al..
1979).   It does  not react  with photochemically  produced hydroxyl radicals
(Atkinson,  1985).    It  will  therefore  disperse over  the  globe  and  diffuse
slowly  Into the stratosphere where It will be  photolyzed by the short  wave
length  UV  radiation and 0(10)  attack  (Borchers et al.,  1987).   Over  80%  of
the I,l,2-tr1ch1oro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  In  the stratosphere  Is  estimated
to  be  removed  by  photolysis   (Chou  et  al..   1978).    Chlorine  radicals
generated   In  the  photolysis  are  responsible  for  the  destruction  of   the
stratospheric  ozone  layer.  An  Intensive  7-year  study monitored  1,1,2-trl-
chloro-1,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  weekly  at  seven  locations  ranging  from  the
arctic  to  the antarctic regions.   The  data applied to a  global  mass  balance
equation resulted In a  half-life of 48.5 years  (Khalll  and Rasmussen, 1988).
Previous  estimated   half-lives  for  1.1.2-tr1chloro-1.2.2-tr1fluoroethane  In
the atmosphere range from 44-85 years  (Chou et  al.. 1978); therefore,  the
1,1,2-trkhloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  released  to  the atmosphere  would  be
expected to accumulate  and Us concentration  In air  would  be fairly  uniform
over the globe.   Its concentration  will decrease  sharply  with altitude as  It
reaches the stratosphere (Borchers  et al.,  1987; Fabian,  1986).
    l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane   will  also   be   removed  from   the
atmosphere  by dry  and  wet  deposition; however,  the  1,l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-
tMfluoroethane  removed   In  this  manner  will   volatilize  back  Into   the
atmosphere.
0275d                               -5-                               11/15/89

-------
 2.2.    HATER
    The fate  of I,1,2-tr1ch1oro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  1n  water  depends  on
 Us  transport,  not  Us  degradation.  1,1.2-Trlchloro-l.2,2-tr1fluoroethane
 has  a very high  vapor  pressure,  330 mm Hg at  25'C  (Parrlsh,  1983),  and low
 solubility  In water, 170  mg/l (Smart,  1980).  The  Henry's  Law constant for
 I,l,2-tr1ch1oro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane calculated  from Us vapor pressure and
 water   solubility   Is  0.48  atm-mVmol;  therefore.  Us  volatilization  from
 water  will  be  rapid.   The  volatilization  rate will  be controlled  by Us
 diffusion  through  water.   The half-life  of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-tr1fluoro-
 ethane In  a model river 1 m deep, flowing at 1 m/sec, with a wind of 3 m/sec
 Is estimated  to be 4.0  hours (Thomas,  1982).   Experimental  data regarding
 the   adsorption   of  1,1.2-trlchloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  to  sediment  and
 suspended  solids In the water column were not found In the available litera-
 ture.   Based  on Us water  solubility.  170  mg/l at  25'C  (Smart.  1980),  a
 KQC  of 426 was  estimated using  a  regression equation  based  on chlorinated
 hydrocarbons,  log  KQC  •  -0.557  log S «•  4.277  (S  1n jimol/l)   (Chlou  et
 al.,  1979;  Lyman,  1982).   Therefore,  1 ,l,2-tr1chloro-l.2.2-tr1fluoroethane
 would  probably adsorb  moderately to sediment  and  suspended  solids  In the
                                                    •
 water column.
    Fluorocarbons   are   chemically    Inert  under   environmental   conditions
 (Council on Environmental Quality.  1975).   Under  environmental  conditions.
 alkyl  fluorides  are  likely  to hydrolyze  too slowly  for this pathway  to  be
 significant  (Rabey  and  mil.  1978).  The reactivity of  fluorlnated  alkanes
 decreases as  the fluorine content of the molecule  Increases  (Smart.  1980).
 The rate of hydrolysis  of I,l,2-tr1chloro-1.2'.2-tr1fluoroethane Is very low.
 (<0.005  g/i-yr)  at  30*C.  (Du Pont  de  Nemours  Co..   1980).   Fluorocarbons
 are  highly  resistant  to  attack  by oxidizing  agents  under  environmental
0275d                               -6-                              11/15/89

-------
conditions   (Howard  et  al..  1975).   Lacking  any  UV   absorption  >290  nm
(Hubrlch  and Stahl.  1980).  direct photolysis should not be significant.   Its
Inertness  to  photooxldatlon  Is  Illustrated  by  Us  use  as a  solvent  for
determining  the  photooxldatlon  of  organic  compounds  by  hydroxyl  radicals
(Dllllng  et  al.,  1988).   While  no  Information   was  found  concerning  the
blodegradatlon  of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-trlfluoroethane,  Us  rapid  volatili-
zation  would limit,  If  not  preclude, blodegradatlon  (Howard et al..  1975).
No experimental  data were found regarding the bloconcentratlon  of 1,1.2-tM-
chloro-l.2,2-tr1fluoroethane   In   fish   and   aquatic  organlcs.   No  reports
concerning   Us  detection  In  fish   were  located.  Based   on  Us   log  K
                                                                          ow
determined   by  high  pressure   liquid  chromatography  to  be  3.16 (HcOuffle,
1981),  a BCF of  148 may be estimated  from  the equation log BCF * 0.76  log
KOW  0.23  (Bysshe,  1982). ' This  Indicates  that   1.1.2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1-
fluoroethane should have a   fairly  low  potential  for  bloconcentratlng  In
aquatic organisms.
2.3.   SOIL
    Pertinent  data  regarding  the adsorption  of  I.l.2-tr1ch1oro-l.2.2-tr1-
fluoroethane to  soil were not located In  the literature  cited In Appendix A.
Its  estimated  K    of  426   (see  Section   2.1.)  would  Indicate  a   medium
potential  for  leaching Into groundwater  (Swann  et al..  1983).   To  ascertain
Its  leaching potential  from  landfills,  columns  of  domestic waste contami-
nated  with  1,1,2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  and   other   halogenated
organic solvents were eluted  with water  (Jones  et al., 1978).  The  concen-
tration of  the  I,l,2-tr1ch1oro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane was  at least 2 orders
of magnitude lower  than  In  the solid waste, suggesting  that evaporation and
possibly adsorption  effectively reduces  the  solvent  leached  from landfills.
0275d                               -7-                              11/15/89

-------
It  has  been  reported  In  contaminated groundwater  near  a  municipal  solid
waste  landfill  (Sabel  and Clark.  1984).   Because  of  Us  very  high vapor
pressure, very  high Henry's  Law  constant  and  moderate  adsorption to soil.
1,1,2-trlchloro-l ,2,2-tMfluoroethane  would   be   expected   to   volatilize
rapidly from both dry and moist soil.
    Pertinent  data  regarding the  fate  of  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane In soil as  a  result of mlcroblal  or  chemical reactions  or  Interaction
with sunlight were not  located  In  the  available literature cited  In Appendix
A.   Based  on  Its   very  high  volatility  and  general  unreactlvHy,  It  Is
unlikely  that photooxldatlon, hydrolysis or blodegradatlon will be signifi-
cant In soil.
2.4.   SUMMARY
    The  key  factors  affecting  the  fate of  I,l.2-tr1chloro-l.2.2-trlfluoro-
ethane  1n the environment  are  Us  very high  vapor pressure,  combined  with
Us  low  solubility  In water  and  chemical   Inertness.   The  Henry's   Law
constant  for  1,1.2-trlchloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  calculated  from Us vapor
pressure.  330 mm  Hg  at   25*C  (Parrlsh.  1983).  and water  solubility.   170
mg/l  (Smart.  1980).  Is   0.48  atm-m»/mo1.   Therefore.  Us  volatilization
from water  will  be very rapid, with the  volatilization rate  limited by  Us
diffusion through  water.   The half-life of  1,l.2-tr1ch1oro-l,2.2-trlfluoro-
ethane 1n a model river 1 m deep,  flowing at 1  m/sec. with a wind  of  3 m/sec
Is  estimated  to  be  4.0 hours (Thomas. 1982).   Experimental data  regarding
the  adsorption of  1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane to  soil,  sediment
and suspended  solids In the  water column were  not located  In  the available
literature,  and  a  KQC  of  426 was estimated from Us  water solubility  (see
Section  2.1.).  This  moderate KQC  Indicates  that adsorption to  sediment
and partlculate  matter In  the water  column would  not compete  effectively
0275d                               -8-                              11/15/89

-------
 with volatilization  from water.  Because of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoro-
 ethane's  high  vapor  pressure,  high Henry's Law constant and moderate adsorp-
 tion to  soil,  1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane would  also be expected
 to volatilize rapidly  from  both  dry and  moist soil.   Its  K    of 426  would
 Indicate  a moderate potential  for  leaching  Into  groundwater  (Swann et  al.,
 1983).
     Pertinent  data  regarding  the  fate  of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
 ethane  In water or  soil as a  result of microblal  or  chemical reactions  or
 Interaction with sunlight  were not located In  the available literature  cited
 In Appendix A.  Under  environmental conditions,  alky!  fluorides are  likely
'.to hydrolyze  too  slowly for  this  pathway to be significant (Nabey and  Hill,
 1978).   Fluorocarbons  are highly  resistant  to  attack  by  oxidizing  agents
 under  environmental  conditions  (Howard  et  al..  1975).   Lacking  any  UV
 absorption >290 nm  (HubMch  and  Stahl.  1980),  direct  photolysis should not
 be significant.  While  no Information was  found concerning  the  blodegrada-
 tlon  of   I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane.  Us   rapid   volatilization
 would limit,  If not  preclude, blodegradatlon  (Howard  et al..  1975);  there-
 fore. It   Is unlikely that photooxldatlon. hydrolysis or  blodegradatlon will
 be significant  In water  or soil.
     Pertinent  data  regarding  the bloconcentratlon  of  1.1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-
 trlfluoroethane In  fish  and  aquatic  organisms were   not   located  In  the
 available literature.   The estimated 8CF. 148 (see  Section  2.1.),  Indicates
 that I,l,2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  should have  a low  potential for
 bloconcentratlng In  aquatic  organisms.
     As  a result  of Its  high  volatility,  T.I,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoro-
 ethane  will  partition  Into  air.    1,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  Is
 extremely stable  In the  troposphere  (Borchers  et   al..  1987); U will not
 directly  photolyze or react with photochemically produced hydroxyl  radicals.

 0275d                               -9-                              11/15/89

-------
It Mill  disperse over  the  globe and  diffuse slowly Into  the  stratosphere.
where  It  will  be destroyed  by  photolysis  by short wave  length  UV  radiation
and.  to  a  lesser  degree,   by  0(1D)  attack  (Botchers  et  al., 1987).   An
Intensive   7-year   study   monitored   1.1,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane
weekly at seven  locations ranging from the  arctic  to the antarctic regions.
The  data  applied to a  global  mass balance  equation  resulted  In a  half-life
of 48.5 years  (Khali!  and Rasmussen,  1988).   Therefore,  the 1,1,2-trlchloro-
1.2,2-trlfluoroethane  released  to air  would  be expected  to accumulate there.
Its  concentration In  the atmosphere,  removed  from local  sources,  would  be
fairly  uniform  over  the world.   1.1.2-Tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  will
be  removed  from the atmosphere by  dry and wet deposition and will  return to
the  atmosphere by volatilization.
0275d                                -10-                              11/15/89

-------
                                3.  EXPOSURE
3.1.    HATER
   A  study  was conducted  to  determine  the  levels  of  selected volatile
pollutants  In raw  and  treated drinking  water  along a  portion  of the  Great
Lakes basin.   Nine  raw  and treated Canadian water supplies were  sampled once
during summer,  1982;  winter,  1983;  and  spring. 1983.   A  tenth plant  was
sampled on  5  consecutive  days In  each  period (Otson,  1987).   In all   time
periods,  1-3  of the  14  samples  contained  >0.1  yg/i  of  1,1,2-trlchloro-
1,2,2-tMfluoroethane  1n  raw and  treated  water.   An additional  1-11  samples
contained  trace levels of the pollutant.   In  all cases,  the  mean value  of
I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  was  <0.1   yg/i.   Another  study   of
the  Great Lakes  basin  found  1,1,2-tMchloro-l,2.2-tMfluoroethane 1n  water
samples taken from  the  Niagara River (Lake Ontario basin)  and Cayuhoga  River
(Lake Erie  Basin},  but not  the western  section of Lake Ontario  (Great  Lakes
Hater Quality Board, 1983).   No  concentration  levels  were  reported.   In  a
survey of  leaching  from  municipal  solid  waste  landfills  In  Minnesota,
1,1,2-trlchloro-l ,2,2-trlfluoroethane  was  found  In  1  of   13  grouridwater
samples  at   a   concentration  of   1.3   vg/t   (Sabel   and  Clark,   1984).
l,l,2-TMchloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  has been  found at 8 of 1177 hazardous
waste sites  listed  on the National  Priorities List  (MITRE.  1988).  It  could
leach  from  these  landfills  Into  groundwater.   These  studies  Indicate that
the  general  population  may  be  exposed   to  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoro-
ethane In water.
3.2.    FOOD
    l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane would   tend  to  partition   In air,
rather than  soil and water,  because  of  Us  high volatility;  therefore, If
I.l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  occurs  1n  food.  It would  most  likely
0275d                               -11-                             11/15/89

-------
 result  From  air  Intake  by a  plant  or  animal.  A  pilot  study  of volatile
 organic  chemicals  In  mothers'  milk  found  that  all eight  samples  of  milk
 obtained   from  women  In  four  urban  areas  In the  United  States  contained
 I,l,2-tr1chloro-1.2,2-tr1f1uoroethane;   the   levels  were   not   quantified
 (PelUzzaM,  1982).  The  Infants of  these  mothers  would  therefore  be exposed
 to  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l.2.2-tr1fluoroethane  In their food.  No other data were
 located   In  the  available literature   In  which  1,l,2-tr1chloro-l.2.2-tM-
 fluoroethane was found In food.
 3.3.    INHALATION
     l,1,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1f1uoroethane found In  the atmosphere  originates
 entirely  from   anthropogenic  sources.   Since  Its  atmospheric  lifetime  Is
 extremely  long,  almost  all  the pollutant  released has  accumulated  In  the
 atmosphere.  A  7-year   monitoring  study  conducted at  seven  remote  sites
 around  the world reported  that  the  concentration  of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-
 trlfluoroethane  In  the atmosphere  has  doubled In  the last  5  years.   As  of
 September   1988,  the  concentration  ranged   from  40-50  ppt  (Khalll  and
 Rasmus sen,  1988).  An analysis of data collected  In  2 years  of monitoring at
 Barrows,  AK,  Indicates  that  the  level  of  1,l,2-tr1ch1oro-1.2,2-tr1fluoro-
 ethane  In  the   atmosphere  1s  Increasing  14%  each  year (Borchers  et  al.,
 1987); therefore, we are  exposed to 1 ,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane In
 air all over  the world.
    The median  concentration of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane at six
 selected rural  and remote  sites  and 15 selected urban and suburban sites In
 the United States  was 31  and  170  ppt.  respectively (Brodzlnsky  and Singh,
 1982).  The maximum concentration  reported In urban/suburban sites was 4100
 ppt.  The  data   summarized In  this   survey  came from a  number of studies and
 spanned many  years.   Assuming an  air concentration of  31  and 170  ppt  In


0275d                                -12-                             n/i5/89

-------
rural and  urban areas  and  an  air  Intake of  20  m3.  a person would  breathe
In  4.8  and  26  vq  of  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  dally.   Of  79
air samples  taken  from the  Kanawana  Valley. HV  (March,  1986).  Los  Angeles.
CA (August,  1986)  and  Houston. TX  (August.  1986  to March.  1987).  60  were <1
ppb (mean  value of 0.27  ppb)  and  19  were  >1  ppb (mean  6.69  ppb)  (Plell et
al.,  1988).
    In  1987,  the  results of  an  EPA   survey of  solvents  found  In  household
products  was  published  (Weststat.  Inc.  and Midwest   Research  Institute,
1987).  In  the  survey, various  brands of products In  82 product  categories
were  analyzed.   Of  these.   67 contained  solvents  and 11  of these  product
categories  had  one  or  more  brands   containing  1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trl-
fluoroethane.   The products  most  likely to  contain 1.1.2-tr1ch1oro-l,2,2-
trlfluoroethane were VCR  cleaners (71X),  video disk cleaners (67%),  electric
shaver cleaners (25X) and specialIzed'aerosol  cleaners (25X).  Many  of these
products were entirely  or almost entirely composed of 1.1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-
trlfluoroethane and were  not  labeled as to  their   contents.   Any  volatile
solvent  will  expose people  In  the vicinity  to  the  compound unless  extreme
precautions  are taken.   No  concentration   levels  of 1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-
trlfluoroethane  In  homes where  products  containing 1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-
trlfluoroethane were found  In  the available  literature.
    Since  I,l.2-tr1chloro-l.2.2-tr1fluoroethane   Is   used  primarily  as  a
solvent  and  Is  highly  volatile,  there Is a great  potential  for exposure In
the workplace.  According to statistical estimates,  134,476 workers,  Includ-
ing  50,482 women,  are  exposed  to I.l,2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-trIfluoroethane 1n
the  workplace  (NIOSH.   1988).   The   National' Occupational  Exposure  Survey
(NOES)  was  based  on  field  surveys   of  4490  facilities  and designed  as a
nationwide survey  based  on  a statistical sample of  virtually all workplace


0275d                               -13-                             11/15/89

-------
environments  \n  the United  States  where eight  or  more  persons  are  employed
1n  all  standard  Industrial  codes  except  mining and  agriculture.   A  German
survey conducted  from 1978-1982 of  organic  solvents  present  in  275  products
commonly  found   In  the  workplace  reported  that  1.5X  of  these  products
contained I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  {Lehmann et al., 1986).
    1.1.2-Tr1chloro-1.2.2-trlfluoroethane  was  monitored  In  several  health
hazard  evaluations  conducted  by NIOSH.   An  air  sample at  the  Fischer  and
Porter  Company   In  Warmlnster,  PA.   contained  5.4 mg/ra"  (0.70  ppm)   of
I,1.2-trlchloro-1.2,2-tr1f1uoroethane   (Chrostek,  1980).    1.1.2-trlchloro-
l.2.2-tr1fluoroethane  was used  as   a  degreaser  In the  plant.   Personal  air
samples  for workers In a  plant  In   Pennsylvania that  manufactured automobile
speakers  ranged  from  0.2-6.7  ppm  (Lee and  Parkinson. 1982).  A worker died
and others  were  overcome while  cleaning out  a large vapor degreaser at  a
chemical  fuel plant (Anonymous. 1987).  The decreasing tank  had been drained
of all  the  solvent  except  for  1   gallon.  The concentration  of I,l,2-tr1-
ch1oro-1.2.2-tr1fluoroethane may  have  been as  high as 374.000 ppm.
     Ensrolnger (1988)  sampled  organic  solvents  In 543  workplaces  In  France
from 1981-1985.   Of the  2013 samples.  30 contained  1.1.2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-
trlfluoroethane as follows:   43.5X were <10% of  the  TLV,  43.5X were >10X and
<50X of  the TLV.  10% were >50% and  <100X  of  the TLV  and 3X were >100% of the
TLV.  The ACGIH TLV  Is  1000  ppm  (Lee and  Parkinson. 1982).
3.4.   DERMAL
    Consumers and workers who use  solvents  containing I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-
tMfluoroethane  may be dermally  exposed to this  chemical.  Exposure  may be
                                                         •
from  direct skin  contact with the  liquid  solvent  or  from contact with  vapors
and aerosols.
0275d                                -14-                             11/15/89

-------
3.5.   SUMMARY
    1.1.2-TMchloro-l.2,2-tr1f luoroethane  Is  ubiquitous  In  the  atmosphere.
It  Is entirely derived  from anthropogenic  sources.   Its  atmospheric  lifetime
Is  extremely  long  and almost  all  the pollutant released has  accumulated  In
the atmosphere.   As with  all  Inert  chemicals  that are  used  as a  solvent,
refrigerant or blowing  agent, essentially all of the  chemical  produced  will
eventually  be released  Into  the  atmosphere.   A   7-year  monitoring  study
conducted  at  seven remote  sites  around  the  world  reported that  concentra-
tions of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane In  the atmosphere  doubled  In
the  last  5 years.   As  of  September  1988.  the background concentration  of
                                                                   •i
1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  ranged  from  40-50  ppt  (Khalll   and
Rasmussen. 1988).  This  level  appears  to Increase 14% each  year (Borchers  et
al.,  1987).   The  atmospheric concentration of   I.l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1-
fluoroethane  In  urban  and  Industrial areas may  be  much  higher as 1,1,2-trl-
chloro-l ,2,2-tr1f luoroethane  Is used  In consumer products  and  as an Indus-
trial  solvent.   The  median  and  maximum  concentration  of  1,1,2-trlchloro-
1.2,2-trifluoroethane at  15 selected urban and  suburban  sites  In the United
States was  170 and 4100 ppt,  respectively  (Brodzlnsky and  Singh. 1982).  Of
79 air samples taken  from three urban/Industrial areas of the United States,
19 were >19 ppb  (Plell et al.,  1988).
    Many  consumer  products  contain 1,1,2-tr1chloro-l.2,2-trlfluoroethane  as
a solvent.  The  use of  these products will expose  the user and people nearby
to  1.1.2-trlchloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane.   Exposure  will  be  by Inhalation
and dermal contact with the vapor;  1t may also be  from  skin contact with the
liquid  solvent.    In  a  1987  EPA   survey  of  solvents  found  In  household
products,  13X of  product   categories   had   one  or  more brands  containing
1.1.2-trlchloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  (Weststat. Inc. and Midwest  Research


Q275d                                -15-                            11/15/89

-------
Institute,  1987).   The  products  most  likely  to  contain  1.1.2-trlchloro-
1,2,2-tMfluoroethane  were VCR  cleaners  (71%).  video disk cleaners  (67%),
electric  shaver  cleaners  (25X)  and specialized aerosol cleaners (25X).   Many
of  these  products were entirely  or  almost entirely  composed  of  1,1,2-trl-
chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane and not  labeled as  to  their contents.
    Since   I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  Is  used  primarily  as   a
solvent  and  Is  highly volatile,  there  Is a  potential for exposure  In  the
workplace.   Exposure will be both by Inhalation and dermal contact with the
vapor  and  liquid solvents.   NIOSH  (1988)  estimated  that  134,476 workers,
Including 50,482 wqmen, are exposed  to  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane
In  the workplace.  'In other  NIOSH  surveys,  an  air  sample at  one  company
contained 0.70 ppra of  I,l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane (Chrostek.  1980)
and personal air  samples  for  workers In  another plant contained  1,1,2-trl-
chloro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  ranging  from 0.2-6.7  ppm  (Lee  and  Parkinson.
1982).   A  worker  died and others were  overcome  while cleaning  out  a large
vapor  degreaser;  the  concentration of  1.1,2-tr1chloro-l.2.2-tr1fluoroethane
may have  been  as high as 374,000  ppm  (Anonymous, 1987).  A comprehensive
survey  of 1,1.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  levels  In  occupational atmo-
spheres  In France reported that 1.5X of the workplaces had 1,1,2-trlchloro-
1.2,2-trlfluoroethane  of  which 10X were  between 500 and the TLV value (1000
ppm) and  3X had  levels  >1000 ppm (Ensmlnger.  1988).
    Results  of  surveys Indicate  that the general  population  may be exposed
to  I.1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  In   drinking  water  derived  from
surface  and underground  sources.   l,1,2-Tr1chloro-l.2,2-tr1fluoroethane has
been found In drinking water  In the  Great Lakes  basin.  In a  survey  In which
nine raw  and treated  Canadian water  supplies  were sampled once during each
of  three   seasons, and a  tenth  plant was  sampled  on  5 consecutive days  1n


0275d                                -16-                             11/15/89

-------
each  sampling period  (Otson,  1987),  1-3  samples  contained  >0.1  wg/l  of
1,1.2-tMchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  In  raw  and   treated  water  and  an
additional  1-11  samples  contained  trace levels  of  the  pollutant.   It  has
also  been  found  In  groundwater (1.3  wg/l)  near  a  municipal  solid  waste
landfill (Sabel and Clark. 1984).
    l.l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane would  tend  to  partition  In air,
rather than In soil and  water,  because  of Us high volatility;  therefore. If
1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane 1s  found  In food,  1t would  most  likely
result  from  air  Intake  by  a  plant  or  animal.   l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane  was  found  In all  eight  samples  of mothers' milk  In  a  pilot
study;  the  levels were  not  quantified  (PelUzzarl,  1982).  The  Infants  of
these mothers  would  therefore be exposed to 1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoro-
ethane In their food.
0275d                                -17-                            11/15/89

-------
                         4.  ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY
4.1.   AQUATIC TOXICOLOGY
4.1.1.   Acute  Toxic  Effects  on  Fauna.    Pertinent  data  regarding  the
effects  of  acute  exposure  of  aquatic  fauna  to 1,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane were not located In the available literature  In Appendix A.
4.1.2.   Chronic Effects on Fauna.
    4.1.2.1.   TOXICITY — Pertinent  data  regarding  the  effects  of chronic
exposure of  aquatic  fauna to I,1,2-tr1ch1oro-1.2,2-tr1fluoroethane were not
located In the available literature cited In Appendix  A.
    4.1.2.2.   8IOACCUHULATION/8IOCOHCENTRATION — Pertinent  data  regarding
the bloaccufflulatlon/bloconcentratlon  potential  of I,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane  1n  aquatic  fauna were not  located  In  the available literature
cited  In Appendix A.  .
4.1.3.   Effects on Flora.
    4.1.3.1.   TOXICITY — Pertinent  data  regarding  the  toxic  effects  of
exposure of  aquatic  flora to 1,1.2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-trlfluoroethane were not
located In the available literature cited In Appendix  A.
    4.1.3.2.   BIOCONCENTRATION — Pertinent  data  regarding  the  bloconcen-
tratlon potential  of I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-trlfluoroethane In aquatic flora
were not located In the available literature cited In  Appendix A.
4.1.4.   Effects on  Bacteria.    Pertinent  data  regarding the  effects  of
exposure of  aquatic  bacteria to  1,1,2-tr1chloro-1,2.2-tr1fluoroethane were
not located 1n the  available literature cited In  Appendix  A.
4.2.   TERRESTRIAL  TOXICOLOGY
4.2.1.   Effects  on  Fauna.    Pertinent  data   regarding  the   effects  of
exposure of  terrestrial  fauna  to 1,l.2-tr1ch1oro-l,2,2-tr1f1uoroethane were
not located In the  available literature cited In  Appendix  A.


0275d                                -18-                             11 /15/89

-------
4.2.2.   Effects  on  Flora.   Pertinent   data   regarding  the  effects  of
exposure of  terrestrial  flora to  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  were
not located In the available literature cited In Appendix A.
4.3.   FIELD STUDIES
    Pertinent data  regarding  the  effects  of I.l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane on  flora and  fauna  In the  field  were  not  located In  the  available
literature cited In Appendix A.
4.4.   AQUATIC RISK ASSESSMENT
    No data  were  available  regarding  the  effects  of  exposure  of  aquatic
fauna  and  flora  to  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane,  precluding  the
development  of   freshwater  and  saltwater  criteria  by  the  method  of  U.S.
EPA/OWRS (1986).
4.5.   SUMMARY
    Pertinent data  regarding  the environmental  toxlclty of  1.1,2-tMchloro-
1.2,2«-tr1fluoroethane were  not located In  the  available literature  cited In
Appendix A.
0275d                                -19-                              11/15/89

-------
                             5.   PHARHACOKINETICS
5.1.   ABSORPTION
    Experiments  with  humans  (Morgan  et  al..  1972).  dogs  (Trochlmowlcz  et
al.. 1974) and rats (Andersen et al., 1980)  Indicate that although vapors  of
I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1f1uoroethane  are  poorly  absorbed  by  the  pulmonary
system, measurable absorption occurs.
    Morgan  et al.  (1972)  administered  vapors  of  "Cl-labeled  1,1,2-tM-
chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  to  volunteers  In  single  breaths and  measured
the  change  In concentration  of  radioactivity  In  alveolar air with  breath-
holding  time  and the elimination  of  radioactivity  In breath  during  normal
                                                                •i
breathing over 30 minutes.   The  concentration  of  radlolabel  Inlalveolar air
was -70-80% of the Initial concentration after 40 seconds of breath-holding.
In  contrast,  after  only 10-20  seconds  of breath-holding,  concentrations  of
"Cl-labeled  1,1,2-trlchloroethane  In  alveolar  air had  dropped  to 10%  of
the  Initial  concentration.    In  normal  breathing experiments, 80.2% of  the
radlolabel  Inhaled  1n  a  single  breath of  I.l.2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane (and held for  5  seconds)  was exhaled  after 30 minutes, thus Indicat-
ing that  19.8% of Inhaled  1,1,2-tMchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane was retained
In  the  body.   About  half  of  the  radlolabel   was  exhaled during  the  first
minute, reflecting  the low  rate  of absorption  (Morgan et al.. 1972).
    Andersen et  al. (1980)  could not measure loss of I.l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-
trlfluoroethane  from  the  reclrculatlng atmosphere of a  closed 31  l chamber
containing  nine  rats  and  air  containing  I.l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane at unspecified concentrations.   This  technique allowed measurement  of
absorption rates of  other  vapors   Including  trlchloroethylene.  The results
Indicate  that  net  pulmonary  absorption  of  1,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane was low. relative to other vapors.

0275d                               -20-                             11/15/89

-------
    Troch1mow1cz  et al.  (1974)  measured arterial and  venous  concentrations
of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  In  conscious  beagle dogs during and
after  10-m1nute  Inhalation exposures  to three  concentrations  of I.l,2-tr1-
chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  vapors  (1000.   5000  and  10,000  ppm).   Blood
concentrations Increased  rapidly during the first 5 minutes  of exposure and
tended  to  level  off (arterial)  or  Increase  less rapidly (venous) thereafter
(Figure  5-1).   Arterial  blood  levels  of  I.l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane  Increased  more  rapidly  than  did   venous  blood   levels,  and  both
arterial and  venous blood levels  Increased  with Increasing exposure levels.
The data reinforce  the existence of pulmonary absorption of 1,l,2-tr1chloro-
1,2.2-trlfluoroethane,  Indicate that arterial blood  levels reached apparent
steady-state  within  10  minutes  and  demonstrate  that blood   levels  were
proportional to exposure  level-s.
    The  U.S.  EPA  (1983)  reviewed  unpublished data from  Haskell Laboratory
(1968)  regarding  the  dermal  absorption  of  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoro-
                                                                      9
ethane  In   three  human  subjects.    Liquid  1.1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane was  applied  to the scalp for  15 minutes  or  to the hands and forearms
for  30 minutes,  and  the concentration  of  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoro-
ethane  1n   the  breath  was  measured  at  various  times  after  termination  of
exposure.   The  presence  of   1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  In  the
expired  air Indicated  that  dermal  absorption of I.l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane occurred  In  the  human body, but  the data do not allow quantIta-
tlon of the extent of absorption.
    Data regarding  the rate  and extent of  gastric absorption  of I.l.2-tr1-
chloro-1,2,2-tMfluoroethane  were  not  located  1n  the  available literature
cited In Appendix A.
0275d                                -21-                             11/15/89

-------
                    I"
                      It
                            * •      io  i*j  a    to     u
                                          MINUTE
                                  FIGURE 5-1

        Fluorocarbon 113 Concentration 1n Arterial and Venous Blood of
           Beagle Dogs  During  and  After  I0-H1nute  Exposures  to  Three
                       Inspired  Levels  (Four  Dogs/Level)

                       Source: Trochlmowlcz  et  al.,  1974
0275d
-22-
11/15/89

-------
5.2.   DISTRIBUTION
    In the dog  experiments  by Troch1mow1cz et al.  (1974), concentrations  of
1,l,2-tr1ch1oro-1,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  In  the  blood  dropped  rapidly   upon
termination  of   a  I0-m1nute   exposure   (see  Figure  5-1).   Arterial  blood
concentrations returned to control values  by  15 minutes  after termination  of
exposure.   Concentrations  In  venous  blood  decreased  less  rapidly   than
arterial   levels,  but  nevertheless were  -80% decreased  by 15  minutes  after
termination of exposure.  The  data Indicate  that,  during pulmonary exposure,
blood  contains  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane, which  can  be  distri-
buted  to  other  parts  of  the  body.   The difference  between  the arterial  and
venous concentrations  both  during  and after  exposure  also  suggests  that
1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane Is absorbed  from  the  blood  by  tissues
and subsequently released after exposure.
    Carter  et  al.  (1970)  determined  levels of  1,l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trl-
fluoroethane  In  the brain,  liver,  heart,  fat.  adrenal and  thyroid  of rats
exposed  to  2000 ppm  for  7-14  days.   The  data  are presented  In  Table 5-1.
Concentrations  of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane were  much higher  In
the  fat   than  In  the other   tissues.   Twenty-four  and 48  hours following
termination of  exposure,  1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane could  only be
detected   In  fat,  but  levels  In  the fat  also progressively  decreased with
time after termination of exposure.
    Savolalnen and  PfaffH  (1980) exposed  rats to 1,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane  at  concentrations  of  200,  1000  or  2000  ppm 6  hours/day,  5
days/week for 1  or 2  weeks  and  measured  concentrations of  1,1,2-tMchloro-
1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  In  the  brain  and  per^renal  fat.   Concentrations  In
both  tissues  Increased  with  Increasing  exposure  level,  but duration  of
0275d                                -23-                             11/15/89

-------
                                   TABLE  5-1

        Tissue Concentrations of l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane
                from Rats  Exposed to A1r  Containing 2000 ppm**1*
Exposure
Tissue
Brain (v»g/g)
Liver (yg/g)
Heart (ng/g)
Fat (yg/g)
Adrenal fug)
Thyroid (yg)
7 Days
22.73*1.00
15.77+0.87
16.59+2.56
722.48+71.29
8.39+2.61
1.09+0.46
14 Days
22.65+1.33
15.40+1.72
15.03+2.51
659.24+21.17
3. 47 +.0.34
0.94+2.00
Postexposure
24 Hours . 48 Hours
none none
none ' none
none none
108.45+33.62 5.60+2.94
none none
none none
aSource: Carterr et al., 1970

^Values are means + standard derivation of determinations from five rats.
027 5d
-24-
11/15/89

-------
exposure  (1  week vs.  2  weeks)  did not  alter  tissue concentrations  signifi-
cantly.   In agreement  with  the  measurements  of Carter et al.  (1970), concen-
trations  of  I,l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  In  fat  were  much  larger
(-20-fold)  than  concentrations  In  brain  tissue  (Savolalnen  and  Pfaffll,
1980).
5.3.   METABOLISM
    Data  from experiments designed to  Identify the metabolites  of I,l,2-tr1-
chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  In humans  or  animals  are not  available.   The
only  available   Information  Indicating  a  possible  metabolic  route  Is  the
observation  that.  In  1n  vitro  experiments. 1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoro-
ethane binds to cytochrome  P-450  from rat  hepatic  mlcrosomes,  thus  suggest-
ing  that  1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-tMfluoroethane may  be a substrate for oxlda-
tlve enzymes associated with  P-450 (Va1n1o et  al.,  1980).
    The observations  that  1,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane Is preferen-
tially partitioned  Into  fatty  tissues  but  rapidly disappears  upon  termina-
tion of exposure  (Carter et  al.,  1970;  Savolelnen  and Pfaffll, 1980; Morgan
et  al...   1972)  has  led  to  the  suggestion  that  1,1.2-trlchloro-l,2.2-trl-
fluoroethane  1s  poorly  metabolized  In  mammals  (U.S.   EPA,  1983).   This
suggestion requires  more direct  evidence  for  substantiation, but corrobora-
tive evidence Is provided by  Inhalation  dog studies  on the blotransformatlon
and  elimination of  14C-1abe1ed  homologous  chlorofluorocarbons   (trlchloro-
fluoromethane  and  dlchlorodlfluoromethane).   In  these  studies, dogs  were
given  short-term   (6-20   minutes)   exposures   to   known   amounts   of  the
14C-labeled  compounds.   Exhaled  air  and   urine  were  collected   for  1  hour
and  3  days  after  termination  of exposure,  respectively, and  analyzed for
radioactivity.    CO-  was  separated from other  gases  1n  the  exhaled air aixd
analyzed  for  radioactivity.  Essentially  all  (99-100%)  of the administered


0275d                               -25-                             11/15/89

-------
radioactivity  was  accounted  for   In   the  exhaled  air.   Radioactivity  In
exhaled  CO^  and  In  urine accounted for  only  traces  (<1X)  of the  adminis-
tered dose (Blake and Hergner. 1974).
5.4.   EXCRETION
    1.l,2-Tr1chloro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane   Is   rapidly   cleared   from   the
mammalian  body,  as  Indicated by  Its   rapid  disappearance  from  rat  tissue
during postexposure  periods   (Carter et al.,  1970)  (see Table 5-1) and the
rapid  decrease  1n blood  concentrations of  I,l,2-tr1ch1oro-1,2,2-tr1f1uoro-
ethane  following* 1Q-m1nute  Inhalation exposures  In  dogs  (Troch1mow1cz  et
al., 1974) (see Figure 5-1).
    The  appearance  of 1,1.2-trlchloro-l ,2,2-tMfluoroethane In  the  exhaled
air  of humans  subjected  to   dermal  exposures  to  1,1,2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane  (Haskell Laboratory.  1968) Indicates  that  pulmonary exhalation
represents a  significant  route of excretion.   Direct analysis of urine and
fecal  matter  for  1,1,2-tMchloro-l ,2.2-trlfluoroethane  content  following
exposure  to  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  1s  not available, but  In
dog studies on  the elimination of  homologous  chlorofluorocarbons, only  trace
amounts of radioactivity were found  1n the urine  following  acute Inhalation
exposures to 14C-1abe1ed  compounds  (Blake and  Hergner, 1974).
5.5.   SUWARY
    Inhalation  experiments   In  humans  with   "Cl-labeled  1,1.2-trlchloro-
1,2,2-trlfluoroethane (Morgan  et  al..   1972)  Indicate  that,  although  pulmo-
nary absorption of 1,1.2-tr1chloro-1,2t2-tr1fluoroethane occurs,  the rate of
absorption  Is lower  than  that  of  other  chlorinated  hydrocarbons  such  as
trlchloroethane.  Dermal  absorption  has also been  shown  to  occur  In  humans
(Haskell  Laboratory.  1968).  but   data   regarding  gastric  absorption  of
1,1.2-trlchloro-l.2.2-trlfluoroethane are not  available.


0275d                               -26-                             11/15/89

-------
    Inhalation  studies   with  dogs  (Trochlmowlcz  et  al.,   1974)  and  rats
(Carter et al.,  1970; Salvolalnen  and PfaffH,  1980) Indicate that absorbed
I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  Is rapidly distributed by the blood  to
various organs  and  tissues (Including  the  brain,  liver,  adrenal,  heart and
thyroid) and 1s preferentially deposited Into fat.
    Upon  cessation  of   exposure,   I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane   Is
rapidly cleared  from the  body.  l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  could
not be  detected In the  brain,  liver, heart, adrenal or  thyroid  of rats  24
and 48  hours  after termination  of  a  14-day exposure regime, and  I,l,2-tr1-
chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane-levels  In  fat  were decreased  by  -80  and 99%
during the same respective periods  (Carter et al.,  1970).
    Human data  Indicate  that  pulmonary  exhalation  Is  a  significant  excretory
route  for  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-trlfluoroethane.   l,l,2-Trlchloro-1.2.2-tr1-
fluoroethane was  detected  1n  the  exhaled  air  of  humans  following  dermal
administrations  of  1,1,2-tMchloro-l,2,2-trlf luoroethane  (Haskell   Labora-
tory,  1968).
    Identifications have  not  been  made of in vivo  metabolites  of  1,1,2-trl-
chloro-1,2,2-trlfluoroethane  In animals  or  humans.  Based  upon  the  demon-
stration of In  vitro  binding  of 1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  to  rat
hepatic cytochromc  P-450, a  suggestion has been made  that  1,1,2-tr1chloro-
1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  may  be  oxidized  by  enzymes  associated  with  P-450
(Valnlo et al., 1980). but reaction products have not been Identified.
0275d                               -27-                             11/15/89

-------
                                  6.  EFFECTS
6.1.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
6.1.1.   Inhalation Exposure.
    6.1.1.1.   SUBCHRONIC — Data   regarding  the   toxldty   of   subchronlc
exposure  to 1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2.2-trlfluoroethane  vapors are  limited to  a
single  84-day  rat  study.   Groups of  six  male  Sprague-Oauley  rats  were
exposed by  whole-body Inhalation  to 0  or  200 ppm  I,l,2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane (Industrial grade)  for 8  hours/night for 84 days.   Body weights
and urinary catecholamlne  metabolites  were monitored at Intervals  throughout
the treatment  period.  After  84 days  of  treatment,  the following  endpolnts
were  measured:  liver and kidney weights,  liver  cytochrome P-450 content  and
liver  monooxygenase  activity   (with  7-ethoxycoumar1n  as  substrate).   The
Imposed treatment  did not  significantly affect any of the measured  endpolnts
(Blohm et al..  1985).
    6.1.1.2.    CHRONIC ~ Trochlmowlcz  et  al. (1988)  exposed groups of 100
male  and  100 female  Crl-.COBR  rats  to  0.  2000.  10.000  or 20.000 ppm 1.1,2-
trlchloro-1,2,2-trlfluoroethane  6  hours/day,  5 days/week  for  <24  months.
Hematologlcal  analysis,  chemical  analysis  of  serum  (for example,  alkaline
phosphatase.  blllrubln.  urea  nitrogen, cholesterol  and total protein)  and
urlnalysls  (e.g..  pH. fluoride  concentration,  blood, protein and  blllrubln)
were  conducted  on samples  collected from 10 rats/sex/group  at 3,  6,  12,  18
and 24  months.   Body weights  were measured  periodically.  All major  organs
Including the heart, lungs, brain  and  nasal turblnates  were  examined macro-
scoplcally  and   microscopically  upon  death   and.  In  the  control   and  high-
exposure  groups,  at  termination  of   the  experiment.   Tissues  with  gross
lesions or  masses and  nasal  turblnates  from rats  In  the  low- and Interme-
diate-exposure  groups were  also examined microscopically at termination  of


0275d                                -28-                             11/15/89

-------
the  experiment.   Mo adverse  effects  were noted  within  any of the measured
endpolnts,  with  the  exception  that  body  weight was  decreased relative  to
that  of  controls  1n  both sexes  receiving the  20,000  ppm treatment  and  1n
females  treated  with  10,000 ppm,  especially  after  the  first  50 weeks  of
treatment.   Survival  In  treated  rats  was comparable with  that  of  control
rats.   Some   rats   developed  Cornybacterlure  kutscherl  Infections,   which
resulted  In  deaths  of 3-8% of  the  females and  20-39% of the  males;  the data
Indicated,   however,   that  these  Infections   were   not  treatment-related
(Trochlmowlcz et a!.. 1988).
    No adverse effects  were noted  In comparative examinations  of  50  male
workers  frequently exposed  to  1,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  and  50
unexposed male workers.   Average ages  were  34 years  (range  >  23-51) and  37
years  (range  «   25-63)   for  exposed  and  unexposed   workers,  respectively.
Exposed workers  worked  an  average 2.8  years   (6 hours/day,  5  days/week)  1n
clean  rooms  In  which  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  was  used  dally
for  general  cleaning and degreaslng.  Samples  of  air  In  these  rooms  Indi-
cated  that  1,1.2-trlchloro-l.2,2-tr1fluoroethane concentrations  ranged from
46-4700  ppm with  a mean  (n«161)  of  699 ppm.   Examination  of  the  workers
Included  the  following:   medical  history,  blood cell  counts,  visual  profile.
electrocardiogram,  audlometrlc   test,  serum   analysis   (e.g..  cholesterol.
blllrubln.  BUN,  glucose,  alkaline  phosphatase), chest  X-ray  and  timed lung
vital capacity (Imbus and Adklns, 1972).
    Epldenlologlcal  and case-report   studies   suggest   that  subchronlc  or
chronic  occupational exposure  to  1,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  may
have  neurotoxlc   or neuropsychologlcal  effects, but  additional   Information
and  research 1s  needed  to  substantiate  these  reports.   In  a questionnaire
0275d                                -29-                             11/15/89

-------
study of  Danish metal  workers, workers exposed to I,l,2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-trl-
fluoroethane  ("degreasers")  more  frequently  provided  positive  answers  to
questions  regarding  feelings  of  dizziness  and  drunkenness  at work  and
Irritability  at  home  and  work  than  did  unexposed workers  (Rasmussen  and
Sabroe,  1986).   Rasmussen  et  al.  (1988)  also  reported  that  medical  and
psychological  examinations  of 23 degreasers from a  Danish metal  factory that
exclusively   used  I.l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane   to  clean  metals
revealed  3 workers with  characteristics  of  what the  authors termed slight
psychoorganlc   syndrome.    These  characteristics   Included   the   following:
neuropsychologlcal  symptoms  such as  Increased  Irritability,  headaches  and
Impaired  ability to concentrate  and  remember  appointments and  Instructions;
slight  cerebral cortical  atrophy In two  of the three cases, as  Indicated by
CT  scanning;  and below-normal  performance  In various  psychological  tests
(Rasmussen  et  al..  1988).   Raffl  and  Vlolante  (1981)  reported  a  case  of
neuropathy  In  a woman who  used  liquid 1.1,2-tr1ch1oro-1.2.2-tr1f1uoroethane
dally  to  remove spots from clothes during  the last 7  of  13 years In which
she worked  as  a laundress.   During  the  previous  6  years she  had  used tetra-
chloroethylene.   Exposure  levels experienced  by  the  woman  were not  esti-
mated.  The  woman complained of  pain, paresthesla  and weakness of the legs,
and electromyographlc  examination revealed diminished motor  nerve conduction
velocities  In  the left and right tlblalls  nerves.   The patient  was advised
to  curtail  her exposure  to 1.1.2-tr1chloro-1.2t2-tr1fluoroethane,  and  she
subsequently quit  her  job.  The  authors  reported that the woman's condition
Improved  after  -4  months  without  exposure  to  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane.  but measured  values for  motor nerve conduction  velocity In the
patient's  tlblalls  nerves were  still  below quoted  normal  values  (Raffl  and
Vlolante. 1981).
0275d                                -30-                              11 /15/89

-------
6.1.2.   Oral Exposure.
    6.1.2.1.   SUBCHRONIC — Pertinent data  regarding the  toxic  effects  of
subchronlc  oral  exposure  to  1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane  were  not
located In the available literature cited In Appendix A.
    6.1.2.2.   CHRONIC — Pertinent  data  regarding  the  toxic  effects   of
chronic  exposures   to  orally  administered  I,l,2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-tr1f1uoro-
ethane were not located In the available literature cited In Appendix A.
6.1.3.   Other Relevant  Information.  Steinberg  et  al.  (1969) reported  no
adverse effects  In  studies of dogs,  guinea pigs and rats  exposed  to vapors
of 1,1,2-tr1ch1oro-1,2,2-tr1f1uorbethane  at a  concentration  of 5100  ppm  (6
                                 -•?
hours/day.  5  days/week)   for  4  weeks.    Control   and   treated  groups  each
Included  2  dogs  of  both  sexes, 10  female guinea  pigs  and 10 rats  of  both
sexes.   No  differences  In  the following endpolnts  were observed  between
control and  treated  groups  In  each  species:  growth rate; relative weights of
liver,  spleen,  lung and  kidneys;  and  macroscopic and  microscopic  examina-
tions  of  liver,  kidneys,  lungs,  trachea,  heart  and spleen.   No  treatment-
related alterations  were  observed   In plasma   lactic  dehydrogenase.  amylase
activity,  BUN and  values  for hematocrU,  percent  neutrophlls  and  percent
lymphocytes  In dogs.   Rotobar  performance and  voluntary movement measured by
an activity wheel  were  unaffected  by  the  treatment In  rats  (Steinberg et
al.,  1969).
    Carter  et al.  (1970)  reported  no  significant changes  In hematologlcal
values, clinical chemistries,  electroencephalographlc findings, body weights
or relative organ  weights  In  studies of  4  monkeys,  8  dogs,  40  mice and 50
rats  exposed continuously  to  2000  ppm 1,l,2-'tr1ch1oro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane
for 14 days.  Controls consisted of  4 monkeys,  8 dogs, 20  mice  and 25 rats.
0275d                                -31-                             11/22/89

-------
    Minor  changes  In  liver  cell  histology,  ultrastructure  and  biochemistry
were  reported  In  male  Wlstar  rats  (mean  weight  -  424 g)   exposed  to
I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1f1uoroethane  vapors  at concentrations <2000  ppm as.
compared  with  sham-exposed  controls.   Groups  of  unspecified numbers  were
exposed  to 0,  200.  1000 or  2000 ppm  6  hours/day. 5  days/week  for  1  or  2
weeks.    Significant   (p<0.01)  changes   In   liver  biochemical   parameters
(decreased  reduced  glutathlone and activity  of  NAOPH  cytochrome  c reductase
and  Increased  activity  of  UDP-glucuronosyltransferase) were  most prevalent
at  the highest concentration  provided.  Light  microscopy of  liver  sections
from  all rats  revealed  Upld accumulation that appeared  dose-related.   The
only  change  revealed  by  electron microscopy  was  a   "slight to moderate'
proliferation  and  vacuollzatlon  of the smooth endoplasmlc  retlculum In liver
cells  from rats exposed  to either  1000 or  2000  ppm.  Exposure  to  200 ppm
produced  no effects associated with the liver  (Valnlo  et al.t 1980).
    The  acute  lethality  of l,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroeChane  1s low when
administered  to animals  by  either  oral or Inhalation routes.  An oral  LD5Q
of  43  g/kg was determined  In Sprague-Oawley  rats  (Hlchaelson and Huntsman.
1964),  but  rabbits appeared  to  be more susceptible  (Busey.  1967).   Two of
eight  rabbits  died  after three oral  doses  of 1  g/kg/day.   When  the dose was
Increased  to  5 g/kg/day. half  of the  rabbits  died after  one or  four doses
(Busey.  1967).  In  Inhalation experiments.  Oesollle et al. (196B) determined
2-hour  LCcQ values to  be 95.000. 120.000  and  110.000 ppm  for mice,  guinea
pigs and rats,  respectively.
    Six-hour   exposures   of  rats  and  dogs   to  lower  concentrations  of
I,l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane   vapors  (11.000-13,000  ppm) were  not
lethal,  but  caused  CMS  effects  that  disappeared  after  termination  of
exposure  (Steinberg  et al..  1969).   Clark" and  Tlnston  (1982)  determined an


0275d                               -32-                             11/15/89

-------
ECgQ  value  for CMS  effects  In  rats to  be 28.000 ppm  for  10-mlnute expo-
sures  to  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane.   Minor  biochemical changes
(for   example,   Increased  NAOPH-dlaphorase  activity,  decreased  cerebral ..
glutathlone.  Increased RNA) were  noted  In brain preparations from  male  rats
exposed to  1,1,2-tr1ch1oro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane concentrations <2000 ppm  6
hours/day, 5  days/week  for  2  weeks  {Savolalnen  and  PfaffH,  1980).   The
observed changes were not  dose-related,  however, and  the significance  of  the
changes In the CMS effects noted In other studies Is unclear.
    Although  the  lethality of  acute exposure  to  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane appears  to  be low,  a number of human deaths have  been  attrib-
uted  to  acute exposure  to high  concentrations  of  1.1,2-trlchloro-1,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane  and  related  halogenated  hydrocarbons.   During the  late  1960s,
some  people  In  the  United  States and  other  countries  voluntarily  Inhaled
aerosol  products  containing  halogenated hydrocarbons  Itke  1,1,2-tMchloro-
1,2,2-trlfluoroethane  to  obtain  narcotic  effects.   The popularity of  this
practice  appears  to  have  been  short-lived, perhaps  because  of  the  sudden
deaths that sometimes  occurred.   By 1971, -65 deaths were attributed to this
practice  (Relnhardt  et  al..  1971a).  The  suddenness of death  In otherwise
healthy Individuals,  as  well  as  the failure of autopsies to reveal the cause
of  death,  led  to  the   hypothesis  that  halogenated  hydrocarbons at  high
concentrations  cause  cardiac  arrhythmias,  ventricular   fibrillation  and
cardiac  arrest  {Relnhardt  et  al.,  1971a; Relnhardt  and Haxfleld.  1973;
ZakhaM  and  Avlado.  1982).  Accidental  exposures  to high concentrations of
halogenated  hydrocarbons  have also  been  reported.  Hay and  Blotzer  (1984)
reported  two  cases  of  occupational  deaths attributed to 1,1,2-trlchloro-
1,2,2-trlfluoroethane.   In both  cases,  workers were exposed  to high levels
of   1.1.2-tr1chloro-1.2.2-tr1fluoroethane  vapors   In  confined  spaces.   The


0275d                               -33-                             11/15/89

-------
 first  was  exposed  to  -128.000 ppm  for  <45  minutes, but  the  exposure  level
 for  the  second worker was  not available.   The cause of  death  In both  cases
 was cardiac arrhythmia.
    The  hypothesis  that  high  concentrations  of  I,l,2-tr1ch1oro-1,2,2-tr1-
 fluoroethane  vapors can  cause adverse  cardiovascular  effects  has  received
 support  from  a  number of  animal  experiments  (ZakhaM  and  Avlado.  1982).
 When animals are  exposed  to a  halogenated  hydrocarbon and given an Injection
 of eplnephrlne. arrhythmia  can occur,  as evidenced by electrocardlographlcal
 signals.  This  effect,  known  as cardiac sensltlzatlon,  has  been observed In
 unanesthetlzed  dogs  (Relnhardt  and  Maxfleld,  1973)  and anesthetized  mice
 (Avlado  and  BeleJ, 1974).  Hale  beagle dogs  were  given eplnephrlne  Injec-
 tions  (8 ug/kg)  5  minutes  before  and  5 minutes  following  Initial  exposure
 to  I,l,2-tr1chloro-1,2.2-tr1f1uoroethane  vapors.   Exposure  to  I.l,2-tr1-
 chloro-1.2.2-tr1f1uoroethane  lasted  10  minutes.   Cardiac  arrhythmias  were
 observed In 3/4.  10/29 and  0/12 of  the animals exposed  to respective concen-
 trations of 10.000. 5000. and  2500  ppm (Relnhardt and Maxfleld, 1973).   Male
 Swiss  mice  were   exposed   to  a  similar  protocol,  except   that  mice  were
anesthetized with  sodium  pentobarbltal  (0.7 mg/10 g bw), exposures  were for
6  minutes  and eplnephrlne  doses   (6  ug/kg)  were  administered  2  minutes
after  the  start  of Inhalation.   Cardiac  sensltlzatlon  to  eplnephrlne was
observed  In  3/3  and  1/3  of   the  mice  exposed to  100.000  and  50,000  ppm,
respectively  (Avlado  and  BeleJ.  1974).  Unpublished  data  Indicated  that.
without administration of  exogenous eplnephrlne.  cardiac arrhythmia  did not
occur  In dogs  exposed  to concentrations  <20.000  ppm  while  running   on  a
 treadmill (HullIn  et  al..  1971)  nor In dogs  frightened by a  loud  noise or
electric  shock and exposed   to  10,000 ppm  (U.S.  EPA.  1983).  Clark  and
Tlnston  (1973)  compared  the  cardiac  sensitizing  potency of  14 halogenated
hydrocarbons  administered  by  Inhalation  with   conscious  beagle  dogs.

0275d                                -34-                             11/15/89

-------
Eplnephrlne  (5  wg/kg)  was  administered   Intravenously  during  the  last  10
seconds of exposure and 10 minutes after  exposure.   The  potency  was  directly
related to the saturated  vapor  pressures  of  the  compounds.  Inversely related
to  their  boiling points,  but not  related to structural  features, molecular
weights or  degree of fluorlnatlon.  An  EC5Q (concentration at  which  50% of
the animals  could be  sensitized to exogenous eplnephrlne)  of  10,000 ppm was
determined  for  5-m1nute  exposures to  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane
(Clark  and  Tins ton,  1973).    In  rhesus  monkeys   anesthetized  with  sodium
pentobarbltal  (30  mg/kg),  5-mlnute   exposures  to 25,000  and  50,000  ppm
I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluorpethane  caused  arrhythmias  and  dose-related
                              •i
myocardlal depressions  and tachycardia,  without  administrations  of  exogenous
eplnephrlne  (BeleJ et al.. 1974).
    Avlado  and  Smith  (1975) reported  that  5-m1nute  .In.  vivo  exposures  to
25,000  and  50,000 ppm  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tMfluoroethane decreased  the
pulmonary  resistance and Increased the  pulmonary  compliance  In groups  of
three  anesthetized rhesus monkeys.  Alarle et  al. (1975) reported  that  In
vitro  ventilation of  excised  rat lungs with vapors of 1,1,2-tr1ch1oro-1.2,2-
trlfluoroethane  (concentration  and period of exposure  unspecified)  produced
changes  1n  pressure-volume  relationships  (compared  with  control  excised
lungs)  manifested  predominantly  by  changes   In   surface  tension  at  the
alveolar  surface.  Both  of  these studies  Indicate that acute  exposures  to
high   concentrations  of   I,1,2-tr1ch1oro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane   may  affect
pulmonary  function;  the  authors  of  the  latter  report  suggested that Inter-
actions of 1 ,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane with  the normal surfactant
of  the Inner  alveolar  surface   are  responsible  for surface  tension changes
that alter pulmonary function (Alarle et  al., 1975).
0275d                               -35-                             11/15/89

-------
    Acute exposure  to moderate concentrations  of  1,1,2-trichloro-l,2,2-trl-
fluoroethane  vapors  can alter  psychomotor function  In humans.  Stopps  and
HcLaughUn  (1967)  administered psychophyslologlcal  tests  (manual  dexterity
tests.  Nee leer  cube  test,   card   sorting,  addition  of  three  single-digit
numbers  and a  clerical  task test)  to two men  during -2-hour  exposures  to
I.l.2-tr1chloro-lt2.2-tr1f1uoroethane  at  concentrations  of  0. 1500.  2500.
3500  or  4500 ppm.   Performance was not affected  at  1500  ppm,  but  Increas-
ingly  declined  at concentrations  >2500 ppm.   In a subsequent  experiment  to
examine  the effects  of  dally  6-hour  exposures to  lower  concentrations  of
I.l.2-tr1chloro-l.2,2-tr1f1uoroethane.   four  men  were  exposed  to  0  ppm,  6
hours/day.  5  days/week for 1 week,  followed by  a week of Identical  exposures
to  500 ppm  and  then a week of  Identical exposures to 1000  ppm (Relnhardt et
al..   1971b).   Performance   In   psychophysloloqlcal   tests   (Stopps   and
Mclaughlin, 1967) was not affected  by  exposure  to  I,l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane, and  the subjects  stated that  they were unable to  tell  when
they were being exposed to the  compound, except  for  a  transient awareness of
odor  upon   first  entering  the  exposure chamber.   In  addition,  no  adverse
effects  were  noted  1n a  battery  of  examinations   Including  hematologlcal
analysis,  serum  chemistry   (for   example,   alkaline   phosphatase,   BUN  and
glucose), urlnalysls, chest X-ray and  pulmonary  function tests (for example.
diffusing  capacity  of  lungs   and   fractional   uptake  of  carbon  monoxide)
(Relnhardt et al.. 1971b).
6.2.   CARCINOGEMICITY
6.2.1.   Inhalation.   Data  regarding  the  carc1nogen1c1ty   of   Inhalation
exposures to  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane are limited  to  negative
results  from  the  24-month  study of rats  exposed  to  1,1,2-tMchloro-l,2.2-
trlfluoroethane vapors at concentrations  of  0.  2000.  10.000  or 20.000 ppm 6


0275d                                -36-                             11/15/89

-------
hours/day,  5  days/week  (Troch1mow1cz  et al.,  1988).   Further  experimental
details  of  this study  are discussed  In  Section 6.1.1.2.  Major organs  and
tissues  from  the control  and  high-exposure  groups  were  examined microscopic-
ally.  Microscopic  examination  of organs and tissues of  the  low- and  Inter-
mediate-exposure groups  was  limited  to  rats that  died or were  killed  when
moribund  during the  study  and  to nasal  passages  and  organs  In  which  gross
lesions  or  tissue  masses  were  Identified In rats  killed  at  the end of  the
experiment.   Overall  tumor  Incidence and  Incidences  of  Individual  tumor
types  were similar   In  all  groups,  with the  exception  that  a  significant
Increase  In  pancreatic   Islet  cell  adenomas  was  observed  \n  female  rats
exposed  to  20,000  ppm (Table 6-1).  The  authors did not  consider this  Inci-
dence  compound-related,  because the Incidence of  5/86  was  within historical
background  levels  for  their  laboratory, and female controls  In a  separate
but  concurrent  Inhalation  study  showed  an  Incidence of  6/95 for pancreatic
Islet  cell  adenomas.   Tumors  were also observed In the  nasal passages of one
male  rat from  the  2000  ppm  group and  one  female and  three  males  from the
10.000 ppm  group.   The authors argued that  this Incidence was not  compound-
related  because no   two  tumors were  of the  same cell  type,  there was no
dose-related  trend  and  other  preneoplastlc hlstologlcal  changes  were  not
observed  In the nasal passages  at  any  exposure level.
6.2.2.    Oral.   Pertinent  data   regarding  the   cardnogenldty  of   oral
exposures  to  1,!,2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane were  not  located  1n the
available literature  cited  In Appendix A.
6.2.3.    Other  Relevant  Information.    Other  pertinent  data  regarding  the
cardnogenldty of  1,1,2-trlchloro-l ,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  were not located In
the available literature  dted  In  Appendix A.
0275d                                -37-                             11/15/89

-------
                                   TABLE  6-1

           Incidence of Tumors  In Crl-.CDBR Rats Exposed to Vapors  of
             l,l,2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane for 24 Months3
 Sex
Exposure Levelb
     (ppffl)
Tumor Type
Tumor Incidence
Female



Hale



0
2.000
10.000
20.000
0
2.000
10.000
20.000
pancreatic
Islet cell
adenomas

pancreatic
Islet cell
adenomas

0/85
0/36
0/30
5/86
2/88
1/64
0/58
2/87
                              QUALITY  OF  EVIDENCE

Strengths of Study:  The compound  was administered by  a relevant  route  at
                     three  levels  to   both  sexes.   Adequate  numbers  of
                     animals and adequate duration  of exposure.
Weakness of Study:
Overall Adequacy:
    Some decreased survival  1n  all  groups, which Is due  to
    respiratory Infection.

    Study  was   of  adequate  design,   but  data  were   not
    positive  for   carcinogenic   effect.   Authors   reported
    that Incidence  for  females  at  the  high-exposure  level
    was   within  historical  background  Incidence  level  for
    their laboratory.
aSource:  Troch1mow1cz et al., 1988

''Rats were exposed 6 hours/day, 5 days/week for 24 months
0275d
                                                    ll/15/89

-------
6.3.   HUTAGEMICITY
    l,l,2-Tr1chloro-1,2.2-tr1fluoroethane was  not  mutagenlc   In  assays  for
dominant  lethal  mutations 1n  mice  (Epstein et al.,  1972)  or In assays  for
reverse  mutations  In numerous  strains  of  Salmonella typhlmurlum (Simmon  et
al.. 1977; Longstaff, 1988; Hahurln and Bernstein, 1988) (Table 6-2).
6.4.   DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY
    The  U.S.  EPA  (1983)  presented summaries  of  three  unpublished  studies.
one  rat  study  (Ward,  1983)  and  two  rabbit studies  (Hazelton  Laboratories.
1967a.b),  regarding  the  possible  teratogenlclty of  1 ,1.2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-
trlfluoroethane.   Other  teratogenlclty studies  for  1,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-
trlfluoroethane  were  not  available.    The summarized  data  Indicate  that
1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  was   not  teratogenlc  1n rats  at  the
experimental  exposure levels,  but  conclusions are  precluded 1n the  rabbit
studies  because  of  marked  maternal   toxldty   and  Inadequate  numbers  of
animals.
    Ward  (1983)  exposed  groups  of  24  pregnant rats  to 0, 5000. 12.500 and
25.000 ppm  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  6  hours/day  on days  6-15 of
gestation.  No  macroscopic abnormalities were  noted  In dams  of  the  treated
groups at  autopsy.  The  only  maternal effects noted were  decreases  In body
weight gain,  food  utilization and consumption and  signs  of hyperactlvlty In
the high-exposure  group.   The  author  reported  that  no evidence was  found for
          *
embryotox1c1ty.   Increased  Incidences  of  fetal  ribs  were reported  at all
exposure  levels,  but the  author  stated that  the Incidences  were within the
control  range.
    Hazelton Laboratories  (1967a) exposed  groups  of 12 rabbits to 0.  2000 or
20,000 ppm  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  2  hours/day  on days  8-16 of
presumed gestation.   The  respective  groups, however,  only contained 4. 4 and


0275d                               -39-                             11/15/89

-------
 Wl
O
                                                                                TABLf 6-2

                                                      Nutagenlclty Testing of  l,l,2-TMchloro-1.2.2-tr1Muoroethane
Assay
Ooatnant
lethal
•utatlon
Reverse
•utatlon
Reverse
•utatlon
Reverse
•utatlon
Compound
Indicator/ and/or
Organise Purity
ICR/Ha Swiss NR
•Ice
SalaonelU coanerctal
typhlaurluB
TA1535. TA1S37,
TA1538. TA98
TA100
S. tvphlMrliM coMwrclal
Al 5. TAOO |>N.»>
yyphlMirluM coMwrclal
and TA100
Application
single tntra-
perltoneal
application
vapors In closed
desiccator, 7-10
hours
vapors In closed
systea, 72 hours
NR
Concentration Activating Response Content
or Dose 4 System
200, 1000 ng/kg NA - 7 and 9 wles treated
at low and high dose.
respectively, 8 weeks
of Mtlng. Incidence of
early fetal deaths and
prelnplanatlon losses
within control Units
NR NR - Tested at < toxic con-
centration
NR NR - IA1535 tested at concen-
trations OOO.OOO ppm;
TA100 tested at concen-
trations <200,000 ppM
NR *S-9 - further details not pre-
sented
Reference
Epstein et al.,
1972
Simon et al..
1977
Longs taff. 1968
Kahurln and
Bernstein. 1968
       NA - Not applicable;  NR -  not reported
oo
10

-------
7  rabbits  that were  actually  pregnant.   Maternal  toxldty.  evident In  the
high-exposure  group,  was  characterized  by lowered  body  weight gain during
exposure,  eye  Irritation,  premature delivery   In  one  doe  and  death   of
another.   Examinations  were made  of  the external soft-tissue  and  skeletons
of  19,  8  and  24  fetuses  for  the control,  low- and high-exposure  groups,
respectively.   No differences  were  noted among  the  groups  of  offspring,
except  that  one pup  In  the low-exposure group and  two  In  the  high-exposure
group were dead at  examination.   In an  oral  study, groups of eight female
rabbits  were administered  0,  1  or  5 g/kg  I.l,2-tr1chloro-l.2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane  by  gavage  on  days 8-11 of  presumed gestation (Hazelton  Laboratories,
              •i
1967b).   Pregnancy  was  obtained,  however.  In  only  three,  six  and  four
rabbits  In  the  control, low- and high-exposure  groups,  respectively.    Two
and three  of  the  pregnant females died  In the low- and high-exposure groups,
respectively.   Maternal  toxldty  was  also Indicated by body weight  loss  and
reduced food  and  water  consumption  1n«the high-exposure group.   The marked
maternal  toxldty precluded  evaluation   of  fetotoxldty and  teratogenldty
data.
6.5.   OTHER REPRODUCTIVE EFFECTS
    Pertinent  data  regarding other reproductive  effects  of 1,1,2-tr1chloro-
l.2.2-tr1fluoroethane were  not  located  In the available  literature  cited In
Appendix A.
6.6.   SUMMARY
    Adverse  systemic  effects In  animals caused by  long-term  exposure  (sub-
chronic  or  chronic)  to  vapors   of  1,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane at
concentrations  <2000 pom have not  been  Identified,  but  the  data base Is
limited to two  rat studies  (Blohm et  al., 1985; Trochlmowlcz et al., 1988).
0275d                               -41-                             11/15/89

-------
 At  concentrations  >10.000 ppm.  adverse body weight  changes  were observed In
 rats  (Trochlmowlcz et  a!..  1988).   No  adverse changes  In body.  IWer or
 kidney  weights,  liver  biochemistry or urinary catecholamlne metabolites were
 observed  1n  rats exposed  to  1.1,2-trlchloro-l,2.2-trlfluoroethane vapors at
 concentrations  of  200  ppm  for   84  days  (Blohm  et  al..   1985).   Chronic
'exposure  (24  months)  of rats to 1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane vapors
 at  2000 ppm caused no  adverse  changes 1n  blood and urine chemical Indices.
 body  and organ  weights  or  In  the  histology  of  major organs  and tissues
 (Trochlmowlcz  et  al..  1988).  The same endpolnts were unaffected by higher
 chronic exposure levels,  except  for  body  weight gain, which was decreased In
 both  sexes  of  rats exposed  to  20.000 ppm  and In  fe'male rats  exposed to
 10.000 ppm.
    No  adverse  effects  were  Identified  In  shorter-term  studies  of  dogs,
 guinea  pigs  and rats  exposed to  vapors  of 1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1f1uoro-
 ethane  at concentrations  of 5100  ppm for  -4  weeks (Steinberg et al., 1969).
 Carter  et al.  (1970)  also  reported no  adverse  effects  In  Inhalation studies
 of monkeys, dogs, mice and  rats continuously exposed  to 2000 ppm for 14 days.
    The   only    report   of   1,1,2-tr1chloro-l.2.2-tr1fluoroetnane-tnduced
 systemic effects other  than body  weight changes In animals exposed  to low to
 moderate concentrations comes from a  2-week Inhalation  study of rats (Valnlo
 et  al.. 1980).   Light  microscopy  revealed Upld  accumulation  and electron
 microscopy  revealed changes  1n  the  smooth  endoplasmlc retlculum  In  liver
 cells from rats  exposed  to concentrations  of  1000 or 2000  ppm.  Changes were
 also noted In  enzymlc activities  and  reduced  glutathlone levels In  the liver
 of rats exposed to 2000 ppm (Valnlo et al.. 1980).
    Adverse systemic  effects of  long-term exposure  of humans  to vapors of
 I,l.2-tr1ch1oro-l,2.2-tr1f1uoroethane  have  not  been   clearly  Identified.
0275d                               -42-                             11/15/89

-------
In a  comparison  of  chronically exposed human workers with  unexposed workers
(Irnbus and Adklns,  1972).  no  adverse  effects  were  noted  1n  physical  examina-
tions of  workers who worked  an  average  2.8 years  In rooms  1n  which average.
concentrations of I.l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane were  estimated  to  be
699  ppm.   Epldemlologlcal  and  case-report studies  suggest, however,  that
long-term  occupational  exposure  to  vapors  of  1.1.2-tr1ch1oro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane  may cause neuropsychologlcal  effects  (Rasmussen  and Sabroe,
1986; Rasmus sen  et  al.,  1988)  or  neuropathy   (Raffl  and  Vlolante.  1981).
Further   Information  Is  needed  to  substantiate   the  suggestions  of  the
ep1dem1o1og1ca1 and case-report studies.
    Acute  exposures  (<2  hours)  to  moderate concentrations  (>2500  ppm)  of
I.1,2-tr1chloro-l>2.2-tr1f1uoroethane  vapors  altered   the  performance   of
volunteers  In  psychophyslologlcal  tests  (Stopps  and  Mclaughlin.  1967).
Exposure  of  volunteers  to  lower  concentrations  (<10QO  ppm)  for  a  longer
duration  (6  hours/day.  5  days/week  for 2  weeks)  did not  cause  treatment-
related  changes  In  performance  In  psychophyslologlcal tests or  In  physical
examinations (Relnhardt. et al.. 1971b).
    The  acute  lethality of 1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  Is  low when
administered to  animals by either  oral  or  Inhalation  routes.  An  oral LDg_
of 43 g/kg  was  determined   for  rats (Hlchaelson  and Huntsman,  1964),  but
rabbits  appeared more  susceptible.   Half  of a  group of eight rabbits died
after receiving  one  to four  doses  of  5 g/kg/day  (Busey,  1967).   Two-hour
LC5Q  values   of  95.000.   120,000   and  110,000  ppm  were  determined  for
Inhalation exposures  of mice,  guinea pigs  and  rats,  respectively  (Oesollle
et al..  1968).
    Acute  exposures to  moderate  to high  concentrations  of  1,1,2-trlchloro-
!,2.2-tr1f1uoroethane  caused  CNS effects  In  two animal species.   Reversible


0275d                               -43-                             11/15/89

-------
CMS  effects   were   seen  In  dogs  and  rats  given   6-hour   exposures   to
11.000-13.000  ppm  (Steinberg  et al..  1969), and  an  EC5Q  value of  28.000
ppra was  determined  for  CMS effects In rats  given  10-mlnute  exposures  (Clark
and  Tins ton,  1982).  The  mechanistic connection  between these  CMS  effects
and  the  observation of  minor biochemical effects  In  brain preparations  from
rats  exposed  to  concentrations <2000   ppm for  2  weeks  (Savolalnen  and
Pfaffll, 1980) currently Is unclear.
    Accidental  and  voluntary  human   exposures   to   high  concentrations  of
I,1,2-tr1ch1oro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  vapors caused  sudden  death  generally
thought  to be due  to cardiac  arrest  (Hay  and  Blotzer.  1984;  Relnhardt  et
al.. 1971a.  1973;  ZakhaM  and  Avlado.  1982).  This  hypothesis  has  received
support  from  animal  studies  In which  acute  exposures  (5-10 minutes)  to
moderate  to  high  concentrations caused adverse  cardiac effects.   Cardiac
sensltlzatlon  to eplnephrlne-Induced  arrhythmias  was  observed  In dogs  at
concentrations >5000  ppm (Relnhardt et  al.. 1973) and  In anesthetized  mice
at  concentrations  >50,OQO  ppm  (Avlado  and BeleJ,   1974).   An  EC5Q  for
cardiac sensltlzatlon of 10,000  ppm was  determined for  S-mlnute exposures of
dogs (Clark  and  Tlnston,  1973).   In  anesthetized rhesus monkeys,  5-minute
exposures  to  concentrations  >25,000  ppm  caused  arrhythmias,  myocardlal
depressions and  tachycardia,  without  administration of  exogenous eplnephrlne
(BeleJ  et al.. 1974).
    Acute  5-m1nute  exposures  to vapors  of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1f1uoro-
ethane at  concentrations  >25,000 ppm altered  pulmonary function  In  rhesus
monkeys  (Avlado  and  Smith,  1975).   In. vitro experiments  with  excised  rat
lungs  (AlaMe et al..  1975)  Indicated  that this effect may  Involve Inter-
action of  1,l.2-tr1chloro-1,2.2-tr1f1uoroethane  with  surfactant on the Inner
alveolar surface.
027 5d                               -44-                             11/15/89

-------
    Pertinent data  regarding the systemic toxlclty of chronic or  subchronlc
exposure  to orally  administered 1.1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane were
not located In the available literature cited In Appendix A.
    Data  regarding  the  carclnogenlcHy  of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane are  limited  to a  2-year  Inhalation study 1n which  rats  were  exposed
to  concentrations  of  0.  2000,  10,000  or 20,000  ppm (Trochlmowlcz et  a!..
1988).   No  treatment-related  Increases  In  tumor  Incidences  were  reported.
1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane   was   not  mutagenlc   In  assays   for
dominant  lethal  mutations In mice  (Epstein  et al.,  1972)  nor In  assays  for
reverse  mutations  In  S_.  typhlmurlum  (Simmon  et al., 1977; Longstaff,  1988;
Mahurln and Bernstein, 1988).
    The  U.S.  EPA  (1983)  summarized  three unpublished  studies  (Ward,  1983;
Hazelton  Laboratories,  1967a,b),  which  contain  the  only  available  data
regarding  the  teratogenlclty  and  other  reproductive effects of  1,1,2-trl-
chloro-1,2,2-trlfluoroethane.   The  summarized  data  Indicate  that  I,l,2-tr1-
chloro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  was  not  teratogenlc   In  rats  exposed  to  air
containing  <25,000  ppm on days  6-15 of  gestation (Ward,  1983), but  conclu-
sions  were  precluded  In rabbit   studies  (Hazelton Laboratories,  1967a,b)
because of marked maternal toxlclty and Inadequate numbers  of animals.
0275d                                -45-                            11/15/89

-------
                     7.  EXISTING GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS
7.1.   HUHAN
    The  ACGIH (1986)  established  a TLV-TWA of  1000 ppra (7600 mg/m»)  and a
TLV-STEL  of  1250  ppro  (9500  mg/ma)  for  1.1,2-tr1ch1oro-1.2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane.   These  limits  were  thought  to  provide margins  of  safety  against
systemic  effects and  cardiac sensltlzatlon  such as  that  observed  In dogs
given  5-ra1nute   exposures  to  5000  ppm  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane
(38344  mg/m*}  In  conjunction  with  Intravenous  eplnephrlne  (Relnhardt  et
al., 1973)  (see  Section 6.1.3.).
    OSHA  (1989)  established  limits of  1000 ppm  (7600 mg/m') as  an 8-hour
TWA  and  1250 ppm  (9500 mg/m»)  as  a  15-minute  STEL  for  1.1.2-trlchloro-
1,2,2-trlfluoroethane.  These limits  were  established  to provide margins  of
safety against  cardiac sensltlzatlon as  discussed  above and  to  reduce the
risk of Impaired psychomotor  performance  such  as that reported by Stopps and
HcLaughlln  (1967)  to  occur In  humans  during 2-hour  exposures  to concentra-
tions >2500 ppm  (19.172 mg/m*) (see Section 6.1.3.).
    The U.S.  EPA (1989)  lists a verified RfO  of 30 mg/kg/day for oral expo-
sure to  I.l,2-tr1chloro-l.2.2-tr1fluoroethane.   This RfO 1s being reconsid-
ered and  Is  pending change.   The basis for  the RfO Is  the observation of  no
adverse  effects  1n  humans occupatlonally  exposed  to  vapors  of 1.1,2-tM-
chloro-1,2,2-trlfluoroethane  at  an average concentration  of 699  ppm (5358
mg/ra«)  for  an average  2.77  years  (Imbus and  Adklns.  1972).   To derive the
RfO,  the average   exposure   concentration  was  converted  to  an oral  dose
equivalent  of 273  mg/kg/day. divided  by  an  uncertainty  factor of  10 and
rounded to 30 mg/kg/day.
0275d                               -46-                             11/15/89

-------
7.2.   AQUATIC
    Pertinent  guidelines  and standards  for the  protection  of aquatic  life
from  exposure  to  1,2.2-trlchloro-l.1,2-tr1fluoroethane  were  not located  In
the available literature cited In Appendix A.
0275d                                -47-                             11/15/89

-------
                             B.  RISK ASSESSMENT
8.1.   CARCINOGENICITY
8.1.1.   Inhalation.    Data   regarding  the   cardnogenldty   of   Inhaled
1.1.2-tr1ch1oro-1.2,2-tr1fluoroethane   In  humans  were   not  located.   No
treatment-related  tumorlgenlc  effects  were  noted  In a  24-month  Inhalation
study of  rats  (Trochlmowlcz  et al., 1988).   Groups  of  100 Crl:COBR rats of
both  sexes  were exposed  to  0, 2000,  10,000  or 20,000 ppm  1,1,2-trlchloro-
1.2.2-trlfluoroethane  (15.328,  76,638,   153,276   mg/m«)   6  hours/day,  5
days/week.
8.1.2.   Oral.    Pertinent  data   regarding   the   carclnogenlclty   of   oral
exposure of  humans or animals to  1 ,!,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1f1uoroethane were
not located In  the available  literature cited In Appendix A.
8.1.3.   Other   Routes.    Data  regarding  the cardnogenldty  of  1,1,2-tM-
ch1oro-1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane   by   other  routes  of  exposure or   other  data
regarding  the  carclnogenlclty of  1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-tr1f1uorc«thane were
not located In  the available  literature cited In Appendix A.
8.1.4.   Height of Evidence.   No  data  were available regarding the carclno-
genlclty  of   1.1,2-tr1chloro-l ,2,2-trlfluoroethane  to  humans.   A   single
Inhalation  experiment  using   rats  (Trochlmowlcz et  al.,  1988)  provided the
only  available test  for  the  cardnogenldty  of  1,l,2-tr1ch1oro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane 1n animals.  According   to  the EPA  classification  scheme for
carcinogenic risk  assessment  adopted  by  the  U.S.  EPA  (1986b),  1,l.2-tr1-
chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  Is assigned to EPA Group 0, not classifiable as
to  human  cardnogenldty.  Assignment to  Group E, evidence for  noncardno-
genldty for humans, requires.  In the absence of  human  data,  at least two
animal  tests  of  two species  (U.S.  EPA,  1986b).  and  Is  therefore Inappro-
priate for I,1,2-tr1chloro-1.2,2-tr1fluoroethane.


0275d                               -48-                            12/05/89

-------
8.1.5.   Quantitative Risk Estimates.
    8.1.5.1.   INHALATION ~ The only  carclnoqenlcHy  data  located were the
negative studies using  rats  (Trochlmowlcz  et  al..  1988).  Therefore,  quanti-
tative  estimation  of carcinogenic  risk  associated with  Inhalation  exposure
to I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane cannot be made.
    8.1.5.2.   ORAL — Lack  of  data  precludes  quantitative  estimation  of
carcinogenic  risk  associated  with  oral  exposure  to  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-
trlfluoroethane.
8.2.   SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
8.2.1.   Inhalation Exposure.
    8.2.1.1.   LESS   THAN   LIFETIME   (SUBCHRONIC) —  The  data   base   for
subchronlc   Inhalation   exposure   to   I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane
contains only  an  84-day rat study  (Blohm  et  al.,  1985).  No  adverse  effects
were  observed  In  body  weights,  liver  and kidney  weights,  urinary  levels  of
catecholamlne  metabolites  or  Indices  of  liver biochemistry  In  rats  exposed
to  200  ppm   1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane   (1533  mg/m*)  for   8
hours/night  for 84  days (Rec. 13).  Because  of  the relative  Inadequacies  of
this  study  (no  LOAEL  was  Identified,  a  single  exposure  level  and  small
numbers  of  animals  were  used,  and  no  hlstopathologlcal  examinations  were
performed),  the  chronic  RfD of  27 mg/m» (Section 8.2.1.2.)  Is  adopted  as
the  RfD  for  subchronlc  Inhalation  exposure  to   I,l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane.
    8.2.1.2.   CHRONIC  —The  data  base  for  chronic  Inhalation exposure  to
1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  Includes two studies suitable  for  use
In  risk assessment:  a 24-fflonth Inhalation  study of  rats  (Trochlmowlcz  et
al.,  1988)  and an  ep1den1olog1cal  study  of  human workers frequently exposed
to I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  (Imbus and Adklns, 1972).


0275d                                -49-                             11/15/89

-------
    No adverse effects were noted  In  comparative  physical  examinations  of  50
male   workers   exposed   to   1,1.2-tr1chloro-1.2.2-tr1fluoroethane  and   50
unexposed  workers  (Imbus and  Adklns.  1972).   Exposed  workers  worked  an
average 2.8 years  (6 hours/day. 5  days/week)  In  rooms containing air with  an
average I,l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  concentration of  699 ppm (5357
mg/ra3), as  Indicated  by 161  air  samplings.   Thus,  5357 mg/m3  represents
a NOEL In this study, but a LOAEL was not Identified (Rec. |4).
    The rat study  (TrocMmowIcz et  al..  1988}  provides a more suitable basis
for derivation of  an RfD  for  chronic  Inhalation  exposure to 1,1,2-trlchloro-
1,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  because:   more  precisely  defined,  multiple  exposure
levels were employed;  the  duration of  exposure  was  an entire  lifetime;
          •
hlstopathologlcal  examinations were conducted; and  both a NOEL and a  LOAEL
were  Identified  (Recs.  fl,  2).    Rats  were exposed to 0,  2000.   10.000  or
20.000' ppm  1.1.2-tr1chloro-i,2,2-tMfluoroethane  (15.328.  76,638 and 153.276
mg/m») 6  hours/day. 5  days/week  for  <24 months.   No  adverse  effects  were
noted at  any  exposure  level  In  hematologlcal and  blood  chemical  Indices,
urlnalysls  and    hlstopathologlcal   examinations   of   all  major   organs.
Decreased body  weight gain  was  noted  In both  sexes  receiving  the 153.276
mg/ra»  treatment   and  1n  females   exposed  to  76,638 mg/mj  (Rec.   |2).   The
76,638 mg/m*  level  thus represents  a  LOAEL  for decreased  body  weight  In
female rats and the 15.328 mg/m*  level represents a NOEL (Rec. fl).
    In studies  of dogs  given 10-mlnute exposures  to  1.1,2-tMchloro-l,2,2-
trlfluoroethane (Troch1mow1cz  et al.,  1974), apparent steady-state levels  of
I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane were  reached  In  arterial  blood  within
10  minutes  of the start of  exposure   (see  Section  5.1. and  Figure  5-1).
Therefore,  assuming  that  a   steady state  Is  attained  In the  blood  during
6-hour/day  exposures  and  that   the  blood/gas   partition  coefficient  for
0275d                               -50-                             11/15/89

-------
I,1,2-tr1chloro-1,2,2-tMfluoroethane  Is  the same  In rats  and  humans,  the
rat  NOEL of  15,328 mg/ma  following  exposure for  6  hours/day,  5  days/week
1s the  HEC  associated with no effects.  Adjusting  for  Intermittent  exposure
and applying an  uncertainty  factor  of  100  (10 to extrapolate between species
and  10  to  protect  the  most  sensitive  Individuals) yields  an  RfD of  27
mg/m»  for  chronic   Inhalation  exposure to  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l.2.2-tr1fluoro-
ethane.   This  concentration  Is well below the lowest  levels associated  with
cardiac  sensltlzatlon  to exogenous eplnephrlne  In  dogs  (5000 ppm  or 38.319
mg/m3  for  10  minutes)  (Relnhardt  et  a!.,  1973)  and those associated  with
human  psychomotor   Impairment  (2500  ppm  or  19,160  mg/m»  for   2  hours)
(Stopps and Mclaughlin.  1967)  In acute studies (Recs.  120. 25).
    Confidence  In  the key  study   Is  high.   More  than  adequate numbers  of
animals  were  exposed  to  multiple concentrations, multiple  endpolnts  were
measured  and  both a LOAEL and NOEL were  Identified.   Confidence In the data
base  Is  medium.   Human  acute  experimental  exposure  studies  (Stopps  and
Mclaughlin,  1967;  Relnhardt  et  a!..  1971a.b)  and an  occupational  exposure
study  (Imbus  and Adklns,  1972)  found  no  adverse  effects  at  concentrations
lower than  the chronic rat NOEL.   Although  microscopy  revealed  minor hlsto-
loglcal  and  ultrastructural  changes   In  liver  cells  of   rats  exposed  to
concentrations  of  1000  and 2000  ppm  (7664  and 15,328  mg/ma)  for  2  weeks
(Valnlo  et  al.. 1980)  (Rec.  #12).   the  key study  Identified  (with  light
microscopy)  no hlstopathologlcal  liver effects  upon  much  longer duration of
exposure  and  at  concentrations   <20,000  ppm  (153,276 mg/m').   Summarized
data  from  a  rat  study  Indicate  that 1,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane
was  not  teratogenlc  (Ward,   1983).  but  the data were  not  available  for
review,  and adequate  supporting studies of  the  reproductive and teratogenlc
effects   of   1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1f1uoroethane   are   not   available.
Reflecting confidence  In the data base, confidence  1n the RfO  Is medium.
0275d                               -51-                              11/15/89

-------
8.2.2.   Oral Exposure.
    8.2.2.1.   LESS  THAN  LIFETIME  (SUBCHRONIC) -. Data  were  not  located
regarding  toxlclty  following  subchronlc  oral  exposure  to  1.1.2-trlchloro-
1,2,2-trlfluoroethane  In  humans  or  animals.   Lacking sufficient  data,  the
RfO  of  3 mg/kg/day  for  chronic oral  exposure  to I.l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane  Is  adopted  for  subchronlc  oral  exposure.  Confidence  In  this
RfD Is low. as explained In the next section.
    8.2.2.2.   CHRONIC — Data  were   not  located  regarding   the  chronic
toxlclty  of 1,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  In  humans  following  oral
exposure.  The chronic Inhalation  study  of rats (Trochlmowlcz et al., 1988),
In  which a  LOAEL   of  10.000  ppm (76,638  mg/m»)  and a NOEL  of  2000  ppm
(15.328  mg/m")  6 hours/day.  5  days/week  were  Identified,  may  serve as  the
basis  for an  RfO for  chronic oral  exposure  to 1,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane.
    An equivalent  dose  of 1713 mg/kg/day Is estimated  by  expanding the rat
NOEL  concentration  of  2000  ppm  (15.328  mg/m»)   to  continuous  exposure,
multiplying  the  result  by  the  Inhalation  rate  for  rats  of  0.231  m'/day
estimated according  to  U.S.  EPA  (1980).  and  dividing  by  the  time-weighted
average body weight  of  0.369 kg  for  females exposed  to 2000 ppm. estimated
from graphic data  In the published  report  (Trochlmowlcz et  al..  1988).   An
equivalent absorbed  dose  of  343  mg/kg/day  Is  estimated by  multiplying  the
equivalent dose  by an absorption factor  of 0.2.   The  absorption factor  Is
based upon breath-holding experiments  with humans (Morgan et al.,  1972) (see
Section  5.1.). which Indicated  that  -20%  of  the I.l.2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1-
fluoroethane Inhaled In a single  breath  and held for  30 seconds was absorbed
by  the  pulmonary system, and the assumption  of 100X gastric absorption  of
0275d                               -52-                             11/15/89

-------
I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane.  The absorption factor  for  Inhalation
exposure  Is likely  to  be  an  overestimate,  because 1t  was obtained  under
nonsteady-state conditions.
    The  estimated  equivalent  absorbed  dose  1s  divided  by an  uncertainty
factor of  100  (10 to extrapolate between  species and 10  to  protect  the most
sensitive  Individuals)  to derive an  RfD  of 3 mg/kg/day or  210 mg/day  for  a
70  kg human  for  chronic  oral  exposure  to I.l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane.  Confidence  In  this  RfD Is  low because of the uncertainty associated
with route-to-route  extrapolation.
0275d                                -53-                             11/15/89

-------
                           9.   REPORTABLE  QUANTITIES
9.1.   BASED ON SYSTEMIC TOXICITY
    The  toxlclty  of  I,l,2-tr1ch1oro-l.2,2-tr1fluoroethane  was discussed  In.
Chapter  6.   The only observation of  an adverse effect  caused  by  subchronlc
or  chronic  exposure  to nonlethal  concentrations of  I,l,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-
trlfluoroethane   comes   from   the    24-month   Inhalation   study   of   rats
(Trochlmowlcz  et  al.,  1988)   In  which decreased  body  weights relative  to
controls were  observed  In  rats exposed to either  20,000 ppm (both  sexes)  or
10.000  ppm  (females  only)  for 6 hours/day. 5  days/week.   The  dose-effect
data  for  the  lower  of the  two exposure levels  associated with  this response
are  summarized  In   Table  9-1.   A  CS  Is  calculated  for  each  study  and
presented In  Table  9-2.   Although  a CS  of  4  has been  calculated  for  both
studies  In Table  9-2,  the  study In  which  female  rats  were  exposed  to 10.000
ppm was  chosen to  represent  the  chronic   toxlclty of  1,l,2-tr1chloro-1.2,2-
trtfluoroethane because of  Its lower NED value (Table 9-3).
9.2.   BASED ON CARCINOGENICITY
    As  reviewed  In  Chapter  6.  carclnogenldty  data  for  1.1,2-trlchloro-
1.2,2-trlfluoroethane are limited to  the  negative  Inhalation studies  of rats
(Trochlmowlcz et al.. 1988).   In  Chapter  8.  1,1,2-tr1chloro-l,2,2-tr1fluoro-
ethane was assigned  to  EPA Group 0,  not  calsslfIcable  as  to  human carclno-
genldty.   Because   of  lack  of  positive data,   quantitative  estimates  of
cancer risks cannot  be  derived;  therefore, hazard ranking  based  on carclno-
genldty Is  not possible for  I,l,2-tr1chloro-1.2.2-tr1fluoroethane.
0275d                               -54-                             11/15/89

-------
o
ro
LM
a.
ui
                                TABLE  9-1

Inhalation Toxtclty Summary for l.l.2-Tr1chloro-1.2,2-Tr1fluoroethanea-b

Sex


No. at
Start

Average
Body
Weight
(kg)

Transformed
Exposure Animal Oosec
(mg/kg/day)

Equivalent
Human Dose1'
(mg/kg/day)

Response

                      100
    0.369e
                      100
    0.369e
20,000 ppm
(153.276 mg/n»»)
6 hours/day,
5 days/week.
for 24 months

10,000 ppm
(76,638 mg/m>)
6 hours/day.
5 days/week,
for 24 months
17,134
2982
 8,567
1491
Decreased body
weight relative
to controls
Decreased body
weight relative
to controls
          'Source: Trochlmowtcz et al.,  1988

          bThe vehicle/physical state was vapor and  the purtty of  the compound was 99.89X.

          Calculated  by multiplying  the exposure  concentration  In  mg/m* by  6  hours/24 hours  x 5  days/7  days  x
           rat Inhalation rate [0.231 «»/day  for a rat weighing 0.369 kg (U.S. EPA, 1980)]

          ''Animal dose Is scaled  to  the  human dose by a surface area scaling factor (body weight 2/3).

          eAverage of body weights at 10, 30. 50, 70 and 90 weeks  for females exposed to 20,000 ppm
to

^
CD

-------
                                  TABLE 9-2

     Inhalation Composite Score for  1,1,2-TMchloro-l,2,2-Tr1f1uoroethane
                                Using the  Rat*
Dose/
Duration
{ rag/kg/day)
17,134
8, 567
Chronic
Human NEOb
(mg/day)
208,740
104.370
RVd Effect RVe CS
1 Decreased body 4 4
weight relative
to controls
1 Decreased body 4 4
weight relative
to controls
RQ
5000
5000
aSource:  Trochlmowlcz et al.,  1988

^Calculated by  multiplying the  equivalent  human  dose (expressed as mg/kg/
 day) by  70 kg.  the reference  human body weight
0275d
-56-
11/15/89

-------
                                  TABLE 9-3
                     l,1.2-Tr1chloro-1,2.2-tr1fluoroethane
           Minimum Effective  Dose  (NED) and Reportable Quantity (RQ)


Route:                  Inhalation
Species/Sex:            rat/female
Dose*:                  104,370 mg/day
Duration:               24 months
Effect:                 decreased body weight relative to controls
RVd:                    1
RVe                     4
CS:                     4
RQ:                     5000
Reference:              Troch1mow1cz et al.. 1988

•Equivalent human  dose
 02754
                                     .57.                             11/15/89

-------
                                10.   REFERENCES

ACGIH  (American Conference  of  Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).   1986..
Documentation of the  Threshold Limit Values  and Biological Exposure Indices.
5th ed.  Cincinnati, OH.  p. 603-604.

AlaMe, Y.,  C.  Barrow,  H.A.  Choby  and J.F. Quealy.  1975.  Pulmonary atelec-
tasls  following administration of halogenated  hydrocarbons.   Toxlcol.  Appl.
Pharmacol.   31: 233-242.

Amoore, J.E. and E. Hautala.   1963.   Odor as an aid to cheml'cal safety: Odor
thresholds  compared with  threshold  limit values  and volatilities for  214
Industrial  chemicals  In air and water  dilution.   J.  Appl.  Toxlcol.   3(6):
272-290.

Andersen,  M.E., M.I. Gargas, R.A.  Jones  and  L.J. Jenkins, Jr.  1980.  Deter-
mination of  the kinetic  constants  for  metabolism of Inhaled  toxicants  In
vivo  using  gas uptake measurements.    Toxlcol.   Appl.   Pharmacol.   54(1):
100-116.

Anonymous.    1987.   Fatal   Accident  Circumstances  and  Epidemiology  (FACE)
Report: Worker  dies while  cleaning Freon 113  degreasing tank  In Virginia.
November 21. 1986.  01v.  of Safety  Research, National Institute for Occupa-
tional  Safety   and  Health  (NIOSH).  Morgantown. UV.   Govt.  Rep.  Announce.
Index.  18: 809.
0275d                               -58-                             11/15/89

-------
Atkinson.  R.   1985.    Kinetics  and  mechanisms  of  the  reactions  of  the
hydroxyl radicals with  organic  compounds  In the gas phase.  Chem. Rev.  85:
69-201.

Avlado.  O.M.  and  M.A.  BeleJ.  1974.  Toxlclty of aerosol  propellants  on  the
respiratory  and circulatory  systems.   I.  Cardiac  arrhythmia  1n the  mouse.
Toxicology.   2: 31-42.

Avlado,  O.M.  and  D.G.  Smith.  1975.  Toxlclty of aerosol  propellants  In  the
respiratory  and circulatory  systems.   VIII.  Respiration  and  circulation  In
primates.  Toxicology.  3: 241-252.

BeleJ,  H.A.,  O.G.  Smith and'O.K. Avlado.   1974.   Toxlclty of aerosol propel-
lants  1n" the respiratory  and curculatory  systems.   IV. Cardlotoxlclty  In the
monkey.  Toxicology.   2:  381-395.

Blake,  O.A.   and  G.H.  Hergner.  1974.   Inhalation  studies  on  the  blotrans-
formatlon  and  elimination  of  *4C-tr1chlorofluormethane  and   l*C-d1chloro-
fluoromethane In  beagles.  Toxlcol.  Appl.  Pharmacol.   30:  396-407.

Blohm,  H.,  H. Braun,  P.  Kaschny. H. Schlll, B.  Jastorff  and H.  01ehl.  1985.
Subacute toxlclty  of  1,1 ,l-tr1chloroethane,  noise and their  combination  In
rats.   Ecotoxlcol.  Environ.  Saf.  10(3):  295-301.

Borchers,    R..   P.   Fabian,   B.C.    Krueger,   et   al.    1987.   CFC-113
 (CCI-F-CCIF.) In  the  stratosphere.   Planet. Space  Sc1.  35: 657-663.
 0275d
                                     .59.                             11/15/89

-------
 Brodzlnsky.  R. and  H.B.  Singh.   1982.   Volatile  organic  chemicals  In  the
 atmosphere:  An  assessment   of  available  data.   In:  Handbook  of  Chemical
 Property  Estimation  Methods.   Environmental  Behavior of Organic  Compounds.
 W.J.  Lyman.  W.F.  Reehl and  O.H.  Rosenblatt.  Ed.   McGraw-Hill Book  Co..  New
 York. NY.  p.  184.

 Busey, H.M.   1967.   Unpublished data.  Hazleton  Laboratories.  Falls Church.
 VA,  sponsored  by Haskell  Lab..   Ou  Pont  Co.. Wilmington,  OE.   (Cited  In
 ACGIH. 1986)

 Bysshe,  S.E.   1982.   Bloconcentratlon  factor  In  aquatic  organisms,   in:
 Handbook  for  Chemical  Property Estimation Methods.   Environmental  Behavior
 of  Organic   Compounds,  U.J.   Lyman.  Vi.F.  Reehl.   O.H.   Rosenblatt.   Ed.
McGraw-Hill  Book Co.. New York. NY.  p. 5-1. 5-5.

Carter. V.L..  P.M.   Chlkos.  J.O.  MacEwen  and  K.C. Back.  1970.   Effects  of
 Inhalation of  Freon  113 on Laboratory Animals.  NTIS  AO 727524.  p. 309-325.

Chemllne.  1989.  Chemical Information System (CIS).  On-line: April  3. 1989.

Chlou, C.T.. L.J. Peters  and V.H.  Freed.   1979.  A physical  concept  of soil-
water equilibrium for nonlonlc organic compounds.  Science.   206:  831-832.

Chou. C.C..  R.J.  Mllsteln.  U.S.  Smith.  H. Vera  Ruiz. M.J. Molina  and  F.S.
Rowland.    1978.    Stratospheric   photodlssodatlon   of   several   saturated
perhalochlorofluorocarbon compounds   In  current  technological use  (Fluoro-
carbons -13,  -113, -114, and -115).  J. Phys.  Chen.   82: 1-7.


0275d                               -60-                             11/15/89

-------
Chrostek, W.J.  1980.  Health Hazard Evaluation Report No. HHE-80-072-787 at
Fischer and  Porter  Company, Warmlnster. Pennsylvania.  Olv. of Surveillance.
Hazard Evaluations and Field Studies.  NIOSH.  Cincinnati. OH.  12 p.

Clark. O.G. and O.J.  Tlnston.  1973.  Correlation of  the  cardiac  sensitizing
potential of  halogenated  hydrocarbons with  their  physlcochemlcal  properties.
Br. J. Phartn.  49: 355-357.

Clark,  O.G.   and  D.J. Tlnston.   1982.    Acute  Inhalation toxlclty  of.  some
halogenated and non-halogenated hydrocarbons.  Human Toxlcol.   1:  239-247.

Council  on  Environmental  Quality.  1975.  Fluorocarbons  and the  atmosphere.
National Science Foundation. Washington, DC.

Crockett,  P.U..  8.  K1l1an. K.S.  Crump and  R.B.  Howe.    1985.   Descriptive
methods  for  using data from  dissimilar experiments to locate a  no-adverse-
toxlc-effects region  1n the dose-duration plane.   Prepared by  K.S.  Crump and
Co..  Inc..  under  Contract No. 68-01-6807  for  the  Environmental  Criteria and
Assessment Office.  U.S. EPA. Cincinnati. OH.

Desollle, H., L.  Truffert,  A.  Bourgulgnon, P. Oelavlerre, N.  PhUbert  and C.
Glrard-Uallon.   1968.  Etude  Experimental  de la  ToxIcHe'  de trlchlorotM-
pluoroethane  (Freon  113).   Arch.  Mai.  Prof.  Hed. Trav.  Secur. Soc.   29:
381-388.  (Cited  In U.S.  EPA.  1983)
0275d                                -61-                             11/15/89

-------
Dining,  W.L..  S.J. Gonslor.  G.U.  Boggs and  C.G.  Hendoza.  1988.   Organic
photochemistry  20:  A  method  for estimating  gas-phase  rate  constants  for
reactions  of  hydroxyl   radicals  with organic  compounds  from their  relative
rates  of  reaction  with  hydrogen peroxide  under  photolysis  In  I,l.2-tr1-
chlorotrlfluoroethane.   Environ.  Scl. Technol.  22:  1447-1453.

Du Pont  de Nemours  Co.   1980.  Freon Product  Information  B-2.   E.I.  Ou Pont
de Nemours and Company,  Wilmington, OE.

Durkln,  P. and W.  Meylan.   1988.   User's  Guide for  02PLOT:  A Program  for
Dose/Duration  Graphs.    Prepared   by Chemical   Hazard  Assessment  Division,
Syracuse  Research Corporation  under  Contract  No. 68-C8-0004 for  the Environ-
mental Criteria and Assessment Office. U.S.  EPA, Cincinnati. OH.

Ensmlnger.  A.   1988.    Sampling   of organic   pollutants   In  the  workplace
atmosphere.  Results.   CAH Notes  DOC.  131:  299-301.  (Fre.)

Epstein.  S.S..  E.  Arnold. J.  Andrea. W. Bass and  Y.  Bishop.   1972.   Detec-
tion  of  chemical   mutagens   by   the  dominant  lethal   assay  In  the  mouse.
Toxlcol. Appl. Pharmacol.  23: 288-325.

Fabian.  P.  1986.   Halogenated hydrocarbons  In  the  atmosphere.   In; Handbook
of Environmental  Chemistry.   Vol.  4, Part  A.  0.  Hutzlnger. Ed.   Sprlnger-
Verlag, Berlin,  p.  24-25, 42-43,  48-51.
                                      •

Great Lakes Water Quality Board.   1983.   An  Inventory  of Chemical  Substances
Identified  1n the  Great Lakes  Ecosystem.    Vol.   1:  Summary.   Great  Lakes
Water Quality Board. Windsor, Ontario,  p. 86.

0275d                               -62-                             11/15/89

-------
Haskell  Laboratory.   1968.  Human  Skin Absorption Studies  with Trlchloro-
fluoroethane.  Medical Research Project NBMR-10H  (1968).  Submitted by E.I.
du  Pont  de Nemours and  Company  to U.S. EPA, August,  1979.   (Cited In U.S.
EPA, 1983}

Hawley,  G.G.   1981.   Condensed Chemical  Dictionary,  10th ed.  Von Nostrand
Relnhold, New York.  p. 1043-1044.

Hazelton  Laboratories,  Inc.   1967a.   Unpublished data  of  E.I. du  Pont" de
Nemours  and  Company.   HRO-1015, HLO-242.   Final  report.   Teratology study 1n
rabbits.  Submitted to U.S. EPA. August 20, 1979.  (CUed In  U.S. EPA.  1983}

Hazelton  Laboratories,  Inc.   1967b.   Unpublished data  of  E.I. du  Pont de
Nemours  and  Company.   MR-1962-001.  HLO-0258-67.   Reproduction   study  1n
rabbits.  Submitted In U.S. EPA, August 20, 1979.  (CUed In  U.S. EPA,  1983)

Horvath.  A.L.   1982.   Halogenated Hydrocarbons:  Solubility  Mlsclblllty  with
Water.  Marcel Oekker Inc.. New York, NY.   p. 499.

Howard.  P.H.,  P.R.   Durkln  and  A.  Hanchett.   1975.    Environmental  Hazard
Assessment of  One and Two Carbon Fluorocarbons.  U.S.  EPA,  Office of Toxic
Substances. Washington. OC.  EPA 560/2-75-003.  p. 58-66.

Hubrlch,  C.  and  F.   Stahl.    1980.    The  ultraviolet   absorption  of  some
halogenated  methanes   and  ethanes  of   atmospheric  Interest.   3.  Photochem.
12: 93-107.
0275d                               -63-                             11/15/89

-------
Imbus, H.R.  and  C.  Adklns.   1972.   Physical examinations of workers  exposed
to trlchloroethane.  Arch. Environ. Health.   24:  257-261.

Jones. C.J., B.C.  Hudson,  P.J.  McGugan and A.J. Smith.   1978.   The  leaching
of some halogenated  organic  compounds  from domestic waste.  J.  Hazard.  Hat.
2: 227-233.

Khalll,  M.A.K.   and  R.A.  Rasmussen.   1988.    The global  trends  and  mass
balance of F-113.  Chera. Geol.  70(1-2): 99.

Lee. S.  and  0.  Parkinson.   1982.   Health  Hazard  Evaluation Report  No.  HETA
80-168-1204.  Rola-Esmark Company.  DuBols, Pennsylvania.   Prepared  for NIOSH.
Cincinnati. OH.   30 p.

Lehmann,  £..  J. Gmehllng and  U.  UeldHch.   1986.   Survey on organic  solvents
In  various  products  and methods  for  estimating  workplace exposures.   In_:
Safety  and  Health  Aspects  of   Organic   Solvents,   V.   Rllhlmakl   and  U.
Ulfvarson. Ed.   Alan R. Uss. Inc.. New York.  NY.  p.  31-41.

Longstaff.  E.    1988.    Carcinogenic  and  mutagenlc   potential  of   several
fluorocarbons.   Ann.  NY Acad. Sc1.   534: 283-298.

Lyman,  W.J.    1982.    Environmental  behavior  of  organic  compounds.   In.:
Handbook of  Chemical Property Estimation Methods.  U.J.  Lyman.  U.F.  Reehl and
O.H. Rosenblatt. Ed.   McGraw-Hill Book Co..  New York.  NY.  p.  4-9.
0275d                               -64-                             11/15/89

-------
Mabey,  W.  and  T.  Mill.   1978.   Critical  review  of hydrolysis  of  organic
compounds  In water  under  environmental  conditions.   J.  Phys.  Chem.  Ref.
Data.  7: 383-403.

Mahurln, R.G.  and R.L.  Bernstein.   1988.  Fluorocarbon-enhanced mutagensls
of polyaromatlc hydrocarbons.  Environ.  Res.  45(1):  101-107.

Maklde. Y.,  T. Tomlnaga  and  F.S.  Rowland.   1979.   Gas chromatographlc analy-
sis of halogenated hydrocarbons \n air over Japan.   Chem. Lett.   4: 355-358.

Mantel,  N.  and  M.A.   Schnelderman.    1975.   Estimating  'isafe  levels."  a
hazardous undertaking.  Cancer Res.  35: 1379.

May.  O.C.   and  M.J.  Blotzer.   1984.    A  report  of   occupational  deaths
attributed to fluorocarbon-113.  Arch. Environ. Health.   39(5):  352-354.

McOuffle,  B.  1981.   Estimation  of octanol/water  partition  coefficients  for
organic pollutants using reverse-phase HPLC.  Chemosphere.   10:  73-83.

MUhaelson.  J.B.  and  D.J.  Huntsman.   1964.   Oral  toxlclty  of  l,2,2-tr1-
chloro-l,l.2-tr1fluoroethane.   J.  Med.  Chem.   7:  378-379.   (Cited  In ACGIH.
1986; U.S. EPA.  1983)

MITRE.  1988.  Database, 7th update.  U.S.  EPA, Washington, DC.

Morgan, A.,  A.  Black,  M. Walsh and  D.R.  Belcher.   1972.   The  absorption  and
retention  of Inhaled MuoMnated  hydrocarbon  vapours.   Int.  J.  Appl.  Radlat.
Isot.  23(6): 285-291.

0275d                               -65-                             11/15/89

-------
Mullln.  U.S..  A. Azar. C.I.  Relnhardt.  P.E.  Smith and E.F. Fabryka.   1971.
Halogenated  hydrocarbon  Induced  cardiac  arrhythmias  associated  with  released
of  endogenous  eplnephrlne.  Unpublished  report  of Haskell Laboratory,  E.I.
Oupont  de Nemours and  Company.  MR1262.   HL-279-71.   Submitted  to U.S.  EPA.
(Cited  In U.S. EPA. 1983)

NIOSH   (National  Institute  for  Occupational  Safety  and  Health).   1988.
National  Occupational  Exposure   Survey  (NOES).    NIOSH.   Cincinnati.   OH.
On-line: 5/10/88.

OSHA  (Occupational  Safety and  Health  Administration).  1989.  Air  Contami-
nants.  Final Rule.  29 CFR Part 1910.   Federal Register.   54(12):  2540.

Otson.  R.   1987.  Purgeable brganlcs  In  Great Lakes  raw  and  treated  water.
Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chen.  31: 41-53.

Parrlsh. C.F.   1983.   Solvents, Industrial,   in:  Klrk-Othmer's Encyclopedia
of  Chemical  Technology.  Vol.  21.  3rd ed.   John HI ley and Sons. Inc..  New
York.  p. 380. 400.

PelUzzaM.   E.O..  T.O.  Hartwell.  B.S.H.  Harris. R.O.  Waddell.  O.A.  UhUaker
and  H.O.  Erlckson.   1982.  Purgeable  organic compounds  In mother's  milk.
Bull. Environ. Contan. Toxlcol.  28:  322-328.

Plell,  J.D.,  K.O. Oliver  and U.A.  HcClenny.  1988.   Ambient air  anaylses
using  nonspecific  flame lonlzatlon  and  electron capture  detection  compared
to  specific  detection by mass  spectroscopy.   J.  Air  Pollut.  Control  Assoc.
38: 1006-1010.

0275d                               -66-                             11/15/89

-------
Raffl, G.B. and  F.S. Vlolante.  1981.  Freon 113 neurotoxlc?  A case report.
Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health.  49:  125-127.

Rasmus sen, K. and  S. Sabroe.   1986.   Neuropsychologlcal symptoms among metal
workers  exposed  to  halogenated  hydrocarbons.   Scand.  J.  Soc.  Hed.  H(3):
161-168.

Rasmussen,  K..   H.J.  Jeppesen and  P.  Arllen-Soborg.   1988.   Psychoorganlc
syndrome  from exposure  to  fluorocarbon-113:  An  occupational disease.  Eur.
Neurol.  28(4):  205-207.
                                                                    •1
Relnhardt.  C.F.  and   H.E.  Maxfleld    1973.   Eplnephrlne-lnduced  cardla
arrhythmia  potential of  some common Industrial  solvents.   J.  Occup.  Hed.
15(12): 953-955.

Relnhardt. C.F.. A.  Azar,  H.E.. HaxHed,  P.F.  Smith  and L.S.  Hullln.  1971a.
Cardiac  arrhythmias  and  aerosol  "sniffing.*   Arch.  Environ.  Health.    2:
265-278.

Relnhardt. C.F.. H. Mclaughlin.   H.E. Haxfleld,  L.S. Hullln and P.E. Smith.
1971D.  Human exposure  to  fluorocarbon  113.  Am. Ind. Hyg.  Assoc.  J.  32(3):
143-152.

Sabel. G.V. and  T.P. Clark.   1984.   Volatile organic compounds  as  Indicators
of  municipal   sold waste  leachate  contamination.   Waste  Hanage.  Res.   2:
119-130.
0275d                               -67-                             11/15/89

-------
Savolalnen,  H.  and P. PfaffH.  1980.   Dose-dependent  neurochemlcal  effects
of   I,1.2-tr1ch1oro-l,2.2-tr1f1uoroethane   Inhalation   exposure   In   rats.
Toxlcol. Lett. (Amst).  6(1): 43-50.

Simmon,  V.F., K.  Kauhanen  and  G.  Tardlff.   1977.   Mutagenlc  activity  of
chemicals  Identified  In  drinking   water.   Oev.  Toxlcol.  Environ.  Sd.   2:
249-258.

Smart,  B.E.   1980.  Fluorine compounds,  organic,   In:  Klrk-Othmer's  Encyclo-
pedia  of  Chemical  Technology. Vol.  10.  3rd ed.   John Wiley and  Sons.  Inc..
                                            •i
New York.  p. 856-866.                       V

SRI  (Stanford  Research  Institute).   1988.   1988  Directory  of   Chemical
Producers:  United  States  of America.   SRI  International.  Kenlo Park.  CA.
p. 1033.

Steinberg.  H..  R.E.  Boldt.  R.A.  Renne  and H.H.  Weeks.   1969.   Inhalation
Toxlclty  of  1.1.2-Tr1chloro-l,2,2-TMfluoroethane   (TCTFE).   Army  Environ-
mental Hygiene Agency. Edgewood Arsenal.  HO.  24  p.

Stopps, G.J.  and H. Mclaughlin.  1967.   Psychophys1olog1cal testing  of  human
subjects exposed to solvent vapors.  Am.  Ind. Hyg.  Assoc. J.  28(1):  43-50.

Swann,  R.L.,  O.A.  Laskowskl. O.A.  NcCall.  K. Vanderkuy  and O.G.  Olshburger.
1983.   A  rapid method  for  the  estimation  of  the  environmental  parameters
octanol/water partition  coefficient, soil  sorptlon constant,  water to  air
ratio, and water solubility.  Res.  Rev.   85: 17-28.
0275d                               -68-                             11/15/89

-------
Thomas.  R.G.   1982.   Volatilization  from water.   In:  Handbook of Chemical
Property  Estimation Methods.  Environmental  Behavior  of Organic  Compounds.
McGraw-Hill Book Co.. New York. MY.  p. 15-1  to 15-34.

Troch1mow1cz,  H.J., A.  Azar,  J.B. Terrlll  and L.S.  Mullln.   1974.    Blood
levels of  fluorocarbon  related to cardiac sensltlzatlon: II.   Am.  Ind.  Hyg.
Assoc. J.  35(10):  632-639.

Trochlmowlcz,  H.J.,  G.M.  Rusch,  T.   Ch1u  and  C.K.  Wood.   1988.   Chronic
Inhalation  toxlclty/carclnogenlclty  study  In  rats  exposed to  fluorocarbon
113 (FC-113).  Fund. Appl. Toxlcol.  11(1):  68-75.

U.S.  EPA.   1980.   Guidelines and Methodology  Used  In  the Preparation  of
Health  Effect  Assessment  Chapters  of  the  Consent  Decree Water, Criteria
Documents.  Federal Register.  45(231): 79347-79357

U.S.  EPA.   1983.   Health  Assessment  Document  for  1.1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trl-
fluoroethane.   (Chlorofluorocarbon CFC-113).   Office of  Health and Environ-
mental  Assessment,  Environmental  Criteria  and Assessment  Office.  Research
Triangle Park, NC.  EPA  600/8-82-002F.  NTIS PB84-118843.

U.S.  EPA.   1984.  Methodology and Guidelines  for  Ranking Chemicals Based  on
Chronic  Toxldty Data.  Prepared  by  the Office of  Health  and Environmental
Assessment.  Environmental  Criteria and Assessment  Office. Cincinnati. OH for
the Office of  Emergency  and  Remedial Response.  Washington, DC.
0275d                                -69-                             11/15/89

-------
U.S.  EPA.   1986*.  Methodology  for Evaluating  Reportable  Quantity  Adjust-
ments Pursuant to CERCLA Section 102.  Prepared  by  the  Carcinogen  Assessment
Group,  Office of  Health  and Environmental  Assessment  for  the  Office  of
Emergency and Remedial Response.  Washington. DC.

U.S.  EPA.    1986b.    Guidelines  for  Carcinogen  Risk  Assessment.   Federal
Register.  51(185):  33992-34003.

U.S.  EPA.   1987.  Graphical  Exposure Modeling System (GEMS).   CLOGP3.   U.S.
EPA. Washington.  OC.

U.S.  EPA.    1989.   Integrated ' Risk  Information  System  (IRIS).   Online.
Office  of  Health and  Environmental Assessment.  Environmental  Criteria  and
Assessment Office, Cincinnati. OH.
                                •
U.S.  EPA/OWRS  (U.S.  Environmental  Protection  Agency/Office of  Water  Regula-
tions  and   Standards).   1986.   Guidelines  for  Deriving Numerical  National
Water  Quality  Criteria  for  the Protection of  Aquatic Organisms  and  Their
Uses.  U.S. EPA.  Washington.  OC.   p. 22-58.  98.  PB85-227049/XAB.

USITC  (U.S.  International  Trade   Commission).    1988.   Synthetic  Organic
Chemicals.   U.S.  Production  and  Sales.  1987.  USITC  Publ.  2118.  Washington.
DC.  p. 15-30.

Valnlo, H.,  J. Nickels and T. Helnonen.  1980.   Dose-related hepatotoxldty
of  I,l,2-tr1ch1oro-l,2,2-tr1fluoroethane  1n short-term Intermittent  Inhala-
tion exposure In  rats.  Toxicology.  18(1):  17-26.


0275d                               -70-                             11/15/89

-------
Verschueren. K.   1983.  Handbook of  Environmental Data on Organic Compounds,
2nd ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold Co.. New York.   p.  1147.

Ward,  R.   1983.    E.I.  du  Pont   de Nemours  and Company.   TransmHtal  of
Summary  of  Teratogenld ty Study of  1,1,2-trlchloro-l,2,2-trlfluoroethane 1n
Rats.   Report  Number  CTL/P/731.    Imperial   Chemical   Industries,   Central
Toxicology  Laboratory,  England.   February 17,  1983.  (Cited  In  U.S. EPA,
1983}

Weststat,  Inc. and Midwest  Research  Institute.   1987.   Household  Solvent
Products: A  "Shelf" Survey with Laboratory Analysis.  U.S.  EPA, Washington,
DC.  EPA-OTS 560/5-87-006.

Zakharl.  S.  and  O.H.  Avlado.  1982.   Cardiovascular toxicology of  aerosol
propellants,   refrigerants   and   related   solvents.   In.:   Cardiovascular
Toxicology, E.W.  Van Stee, Ed.  Raven Press, New York.  p.  281-314.
0275d                               -71-                             11/15/89

-------
                                  APPENDIX A

                              LITERATURE SEARCHED



    This  HEED  1s  based  on  data  Identified  by  computerized  literature

searches of the following:


              CHEHLINE
              TSCATS
              CASH online (U.S. EPA Chemical Activities Status Report)
              TOXLINE
              TOXLIT
              TOXLIT 65
              RTECS
              OHM TAGS
              STORET
              SRC Environmental Fate Data  Bases
              SANSS
              AQUIRE
              TSCAPP
              NTIS
              Federal Register
              CAS ONLINE (Chemistry and Aquatic)
              HSOB
              SCISEARCH
              Federal Research In Progress


These  searches  were conducted  In  April,   1989.  and the  following  secondary

sources were reviewed:
    ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1986.  Documentation  of the  Threshold  Limit Values  and  Biological
    Exposure Indices. Sth ed.  Cincinnati. OH.

    ACGIH  (American  Conference of Governmental  Industrial  Hyglenlsts).
    1987.  TLVs:  Threshold  Limit Values for  Chemical  Substances  In the
    Work  Environment  adopted   by   ACGIH   with  Intended  Changes  for
    1987.1988.  Cincinnati.  OH.  114 p.

    Clayton.  G.O. and  F.E.  Clayton.  Ed.    1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and Toxicology.  3rd rev.  ed..  .Vol.  2A.   John  U1ley  and
    Sons, NY.  2878 p.

    Clayton.  G.O. and  F.E.  Clayton.  Ed.    1981.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and Toxicology.  3rd rev.  ed..  Vol.  2B.   John  Wiley  and
    Sons. NY.  p. 2879-3816.
0275d                               -72-                             11/15/89

-------
    Clayton,  6.D.  and  F.E.   Clayton.  Ed.   1982.   Patty's  Industrial
    Hygiene  and  Toxicology,  3rd  rev.  ed..  Vol.  2C.   John Wiley  and
    Sons, NY.   p.  3817-5112.

    Grayson.  M. and  D.  Eckroth,  Ed.   1978-1984.   Klrk-Othmer  Encyclo-
    pedia of  Chemical  Technology,  3rd ed.   John Wiley and Sons, NY.  23
    Volumes.

    Hamilton,  A.  and H.L.  Hardy.  1974.  Industrial  Toxicology, 3rd ed.
    Publishing  Sciences  Group,  Inc..  Littleton, MA.  575 p.

    IARC  (International  Agency for  Research  on  Cancer).   IARC  Mono-
    graphs  on  the  Evaluation  of Carcinogenic  Risk  of  Chemicals  to
    Humans.   IARC. WHO,  Lyons.  France.

    Jaber,  H.H.,  W.R.  Habey,  A.T.  L1eu,   T.W.  Chou and  H.L.  Johnson.
    1984.    Data  acquisition   for   environmental  transport  and  fate
    screening for  compounds  of  Interest  to  the Office  of Solid Waste.
    EPA  600/6-84-010.   NTIS  PB84-243906.    SRI  International.  Menlo
    Park. CA.

    NTP (National  Toxicology  Program).   1987.  Toxicology Research and
    Testing   Program.   Chemicals  on  Standard  Protocol.   Management
    Status.

    Ouellette,   R.P.  and  J.A.  King.  1977.   Chemical  Week  Pesticide
    Register.  McGraw-Hill Book Co.,  NY.

    Sax,  I.N.  1984.  Dangerous Properties of  Industrial  Materials, 6th
    ed.  Van  Nostrand Relnhold Co..  NY.

    SRI  (Stanford Research  Institute).   1987.   Directory of  Chemical
    Producers.   Menlo Park,  CA.

    U.S.  EPA.   1986.   Report  on Status  Report  In  the  Special  Review
    Program,   Registration  Standards  Program  and   the  Data   Call   In
    Programs.  Registration  Standards and  the Data  Call  1n  Programs.
    Office  of Pesticide Programs,  Washington, DC.

    USITC  (U.S.   International  Trade  Commission).    1986.   Synthetic
    Organic   Chemicals.   U.S.  Production  and  Sales,  1985, USITC  Publ.
    1892, Washington. DC.

    Verschueren,  K.   1983.   Handbook  of  Environmental Data on  Organic
    Chemicals. 2nd ed.  Van Nostrand Relnhold Co..  NY.

    Wlndholz. H..  Ed.   1983.   The Merck  Index,'10th  ed.  Merck and Co.,
    Inc.. Rahway,  NJ.

    Worthing.  C.R. and S.B.  Walker, Ed.   1983.  The  Pesticide Manual.
    British Crop  Protection Council.  695 p.
0275d                                -73-                             11/15/89

-------
    In  addition,  approximately 30  compendia of aquatic  toxlclty data were

reviewed. Including the following:


    Battelle's  Columbus  Laboratories.   1971.   Uater  Quality  Criteria
    Data  Book.   Volume  3.   Effects  of  Chemicals  on   Aquatic  Life.
    Selected  Data  from the Literature  through  1968.  Prepared  for  the
    U.S. EPA under Contract No. 68-01-0007.  Washington,  DC.

    Johnson,  W.W.  and  H.T. Flnley.   1980.  Handbook of  Acute  Toxlclty
    of  Chemicals  to   Fish and  Aquatic   Invertebrates.    Summaries  of
    Toxlclty  Tests  Conducted  at  Columbia  National Fisheries  Research
    Laboratory.   1965-1978.    U.S.  Oept.  Interior, Fish  and  Wildlife
    Serv. Res. Publ.  137,  Washington. OC.

    McKee. J.E. and H.W.  Wolf.  1963.  Water Quality Criteria,  2nd  ed.
    Prepared  for  the   Resources   Agency  of  California.  State  Water
    Quality Control Board.  Publ.  No. 3-A.

    Plmental. 0.  1971.   Ecological  Effects  of  Pesticides on  Non-Target
    Species.  Prepared  for the U.S.  EPA, Washington, OC.   PB-269605.

    Schneider, B.A.  1979.  Toxicology  Handbook.   Mammalian and Aquatic
    Data.  Book 1: Toxicology  Data.   Office  of  Pesticide  Programs. U.S.
    EPA. Washington.  OC.  EPA 540/9-79-003.  NTIS PB 80-196876.
0275d                               -74-                             11/15/89

-------
o
IS)
 in
 l
                                                                               APPENDIX B


                                                        Suomary lable for  l,l,2-lrtchloro-1.2.2-trtfluoroethane
Species
Inhalation Exposure
Subchrontc rat
Chronic rat
Carclnogentclty 10
Oral Exposure
Subchrontc rat
Chronic rat
Carclnogentctty 10
BE PORTABLE QUANTITIES
Based on Chronic Toxlctty:
Based on Carctnogenlclty:
Exposure

10.000 ppM (76.618 Mg/M*)
6 hours/day. S days/week
for 24 Months
10.000 ppM (J6.638 Mg/a>)
6 hours/day. S days/week
for 24 Months
10

10.000 ppM (76. (38 Mg/M*)
6 hours/day. S days/week
for 24 Months
10.000 ppM (76.638 Mg/M*)
6 hours/day. S days/week
for 24 Months
10

5000
10
Effect

decreased body weight relative
to controls In feules; observed
also In Males at higher exposure
concentration
decreased body weight relative
to controls In feMles; observed
also In Males at higher exposure
concentration
10

decreased body weight relative
to controls In feMales; observed
also In Males at higher exposure
concentration
decreased body weight relative
to controls In feMles; observed
also In Males at higher exposure
concentration
10



HfO or qj* Reference

27 Mg/M* TrochlMowlci
et al., 1988
27 Mg/M* TrochlMowlci
et al.. 1988
10 ID

3 Mg/kg/day TrochlMowlci
et al., 1988
3 Mg/kg/day TrochlMowlci
et al., 1988
10 10

Trochlaowlci
et al.. 1988

            ID - Insufficient data
 in
 >x
 00

-------
                                  APPENDIX C
                 DOSE/DURATION RESPONSE GRAPHS FOR EXPOSURE  TO
                     1.1.2-TRICHLORO-1.2.2-TRIFLUOROETHANE
C.I.    DISCUSSION
    Oose/durat1on-response  graphs  for  Inhalation  exposure  to  I,l,2-tr1-
chloro-l,2.2-tr1fluoroethane  generated  by  the  method  of  Crockett et  al.
(1985)  using  the  computer  software  by Durkln  and Meylan  (1988)  developed
under  contract  to  ECAO-C1nc1nnat1 are presented  In  Figures  C-1   and  C-2.
Data  used to  generate these graphs  are presented  In  Section C.2.   In  the
generation of  these figures, all  responses  are  classified  as  adverse  (PEL.
AEL  or  LOAEL) or  nonadverse (NOEL or  NOAEL)  for  plotting.   For Inhalation
exposure,  the  ordlnate expresses  concentration  as  the  experimental concen-
tration  expressed  as  mg/ra»  multiplied by the  time parameters of  the  expo-
sure  protocol  (e.g..  hours/day and days/week)  and  Is presented,  as  expanded
experimental  concentration  [expanded  exp  cone  (mg/m>)].   For  oral  expo-
sure,  the ordlnate  expresses  dose  as  human  equivalent  dose.  The  animal
dose.  In  mg/kg/day  Is  multiplied by  the  cube root  of  the  ratio of  the
animal:human   body  weight   to  adjust  for   species  differences  In  basal
metabolic  rate  (Mantel  and  Schnelderman.  197S).   The  result   Is   then
multiplied by  70 kg.  the reference  human body weight,  to  express  the  human
equivalent dose as  mg/day for a 70 kg human.
    The  boundary  for  adverse  effects   (solid line)  1s  drawn  by  Identifying
the lowest adverse  effect  dose or concentration  at  the  shortest  duration of
exposure at  which  an  adverse effect occurred.   From this point,  an Infinite
line  1s  extended upward* parallel  to  the dose axis.  The  starting  point Is
then  connected to  the lowest  adverse effect  dose  or  concentration at  the
next  longer  duration  of  exposure  that  has an adverse effect dose or concen-
tration equal  to or  lower  than the previous one.  This  process 1s  continued

0275d                               -76-                             11/15/89

-------
    n
    \
    »
           If* • !•
                                  r»
                         •23
                                        Fl«

                                                      nil
                                                      N13
                                                               K3
••••••I      9.999
                              t        9.9*1       *.9l

                              NUWN WUI¥ MMTION
                                                              .1
                                                                          -Ml
                                                                         _l
                                                                          1   t
    f - FEL
    L - LOAEL
    n . NOAEL
    N . NOEL
    A . AEL
                                   FIGURE C-1

            Oose/Ouratlon-Response Graph for Inhalation Exposure to
            l,1.2-Tr1chloro-l,2.2-tMfluoroethane (Envelope Method)
0275d
                        -77-
11/15/89

-------

     H

     C
     U
                                     «.Mt
                              NUIMM RU1W MMTIOM «tl«« It !>*»•«>
                                   r»
    F . PEL
    L • LOAEL
    n . NOAEL
    N - NOEL
    A . AEL
                                  FIGURE  C-2

            Oose/Durat1on-Response Graph for Inhalation Exposure  to
       1J,2-Tr1ch1oro-1.2.2-tr1f1uoroethane  (Censored Envelope Method)
02754
-78-
11/15/89

-------
to the  lowest adverse  effect  dose  or  concentration.   From  this  point,  a  line
1s extended to  the  right, parallel  to  the  duration axis.  The region  of
adverse effects lies above the adverse effects boundary.
    Using  the  envelope method, the boundary  for no  adverse  effects  (dashed
line) 1s drawn  by  Identifying the  highest no  adverse effects  dose or  concen-
tration.   From  this  point, a  line parallel to  the  duration axis  1s  extended
to the  dose or  concentration  axis.   The  starting point  Is then connected  to
the next  lower  or  equal no adverse effect  dose or  concentration  at  a longer
duration of exposure.   When  this process can no longer  be continued,  a  line
1s dropped parallel  to the dose or concentration axis  to  the duration axis.
The  no  adverse  effects  region lies  below  the  no  adverse effects  boundary.
At  either  ends of  the graph  between  the  adverse  effects  and no  adverse
effects  boundaries are  regions  of ambiguity.   The area  (1f any)  resulting
from  Intersection  of  the  adverse  effects and  no adverse  effects boundaries
Is defined as the  region of contradiction.
    In  the censored  data method,  all  no adverse effect points  located In the
region  of   contradiction  are  dropped  from  consideration and the no adverse
effect  boundary Is redrawn so that It does not  Intersect  the adverse effects
boundary  and no region  of contradiction Is  generated.   This method results
In the  most conservative definition of  the  no adverse effects region.
    The graph  1n  Figure C-l   was  generated using  the  envelope method.   The
adverse effects  boundary  Is defined  by  four data  points:   the  LOAEL for
Impaired   psychomotor   function   (Stopps  and   Mclaughlin,  1967)  In  humans
exposed to  2500 ppra for  2 hours  (Rec. f24);  two  LOAELs  for  reversible CNS
effects observed during 5-hour exposures (Steinberg  et al.,  1969) of  dogs  to
13,000  ppm  (Rec.  |18)  and of rats  to 11,000  ppra  (Rec.  f!7);  and the  LOAEL
for  decreased  body  weight In  female rats (Rec.  f2) exposed  to 2000  ppm 6


0275d                                -79-                             11/15/89

-------
hours/day,  5 days/week  for  2  years (Trochlmowlcz  et  al.,  1988).   The no
adverse effects boundary  In  Figure  C-l  Is defined by: NOELs  for  body weight
decreases  In  dogs  (Rec.  #9} and  mice  (Rec.  #10} from the  2-week Inhalation
study by Carter et al. (1970);  NOELs for  body  weight decreases  in dogs  (Rec.
15) and  In rats (Rec. 17)  from a 4-week  study  (Steinberg et al.,  1969);  a
NOAEL (Rec.  14)  for  physical examinations of  occupationally  exposed workers
(Imbus and Adklns.  1972); and  the  NOEL  for weight  decreases In  rats  (Rec.
|1)  from  the  2-year  study  by  Trochlmowlcz  et al.  (1988).  A region of
contradiction Is defined In  Figure C-1.   The rat data  (Recs.  #1,  2)  from the
study by  Trochlmowlcz  et al. (1988) were the  basis  for  the  chronic RfO  for
Inhalation  exposure  derived In  Chapter  8.   The   region  of  contradiction
disappears  In  Figure  C-2,  In which  Recs. 19  and 5  are  not  Included In  the
defining of the no adverse effects boundary.
C.2.   DATA USED TO GENERATE GRAPH
Chemical Name:    1,1,2-TMchloro-l ,2.2tr1fluoroethane
CAS Number:       76-13-1
Document Title:   Health and Environmental Effects Document for 1,1,2-TM-
                  chloro-1,2,2-trlfluoroethane
Document Number:  pending
Document Date:    pending
Document Type:    HEED
RECORD fl:

Species
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Number
Number
: Rats
Both
NOEL
Inhalation
Exposed:
Responses:
200
0
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:

2737.000
24.0 months
24.0 months

               Type of Effect:
               Site of Effect:
               Severity Effect:    3
Comment:       Concentrations studied: 2000. 10,000, 20,000  ppm  6  hours/day,
               S days/week.  See following record.
Citation:      Trochlmowlcz et al.. 1988
0275d
-80-
11/15/89

-------
RECORD f2:
Comment:


Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Female
LOAEL
Inhalation
               Number Exposed:     100
               Number Responses:   NR
               Type of Effect:     WGTDC
               Site of Effect:     BODY
               Severity Effect:    4
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
13685.000
24.0 months
24.0 months
See previous record.
higher concentration.
            Decreased  body weight gain In males  at
Troch1mow1cz et al.. 1988
RECORD 13:


Species: Rats
Sex: Hale
Effect: NOEL



Dose: 511.000
Duration Exposure: 84.0 days
Duration Observation: 84.0 days
Route: Inhalation





Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
6
0


1





Comment:       Experimental   concentration:    200   ppm  8   hours/day.    No
               treatment-related  changes  In  liver,  kidney or  body  weights,
               urinary catecholamlne metabolites or liver cytochrome P-450.

Citation:      81 ohm et al.. 1985
RECORD |4:
Comment:
Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Humans
Male
NOEL
Inhalation
Dose:                  957.000
Duration Exposure:     2.8 years
Duration Observation:  2.8 years
Number Exposed:     50
Number Responses:   0
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:    4
         •
Occupational  exposure study:  workers  averaged  2.8  years  (6
hours/day,5  days/week)   In  rooms with  mean  concentration  of
699  ppm  (cone,  range-46-4700  ppm).   No  adverse effects  In
physical examinations.

Imbus and Adklns, 1972
0275d
                     -81-
                                           11/15/89

-------
 RECORD  IS:
Comment:
Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Dogs
Both
NOEL
Inhalation
Dose:                  6980.000
Duration Exposure:      4.0 weeks
Duration Observation:   4.0 weeks
Number Exposed:     0
Number Responses:   0
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:    3

Experimental  concentration:   5100  ppm  6  hours/day,  5  days/
week.   No  adverse effects   on  body  weight,  organ  weights,
macro or microscopic exam of major organs.

Steinberg et al., 1969
RECORD *6:

Species
Sex
Effect:
Route:
Number
Number
: Guinea pigs
Female
NOEL
Inhalation
Exposed: 10
Responses: 0
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:

6980.000
4.0 weeks
4.0 weeks

Comment:

Citation:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:    3

See record |5.

Steinberg et al.. 1969
RECORD |7:
Comment:


Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Both
NOEL
Inhalation
Dose:                  6980.000
Duration Exposure:     4.0 weeks
Duration Observation:  4.0 weeks
Number Exposed:     20
Number Responses:   0
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:    3

See record  15.   Also, no  effects  on
voluntary movement on activity wheel.

Steinberg et al.. 1969
                           rotobar  performance  and
027 5d
                     -82-
                                           11/15/89

-------
                                            Dose:
                                            Duration  Exposure:
                                            Duration  Observation:
                                                   15328.000
                                                   14.0 days
                                                   14.0 days
RECORD 18:     Species:   Monkeys
               Sex:       NR
               Effect:    NOEL
               Route: Inhalation

               Number Exposed:     4
               Number Responses:   0
               Type of Effect:
               Site of Effect:
               Severity Effect:    3

Comment:       Experimental concentration: 2000 ppm continuous exposure.  No
               significant  changes  In  hematology,  clinical  chemistry,  EEG,
               body or organ weights.

Citation:      Carter et al.t 1970
RECORD 19:


Species: Dogs
Sex: NR
Effect: NOEL



Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
15328.000
14.0 days
14.0 days
Route: Inhalation


Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
8
0




Comment:

Citation:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:

See record 18.

Carter et al., 1970
RECORD |10:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
                          Mice
                          NR
                          NOEL
                          Inhalation
Dose:                  15328.000
Duration Exposure:      14.0 days
Duration Observation:   14.0 days
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:

See record *8.

Carter et al., 1970
                                    40
                                    0
027 5
-------
RECORD |11:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
NR
NOEL
Inhalation
Number Exposed:     0
Number Responses:   0
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:    3

See record f8.

Carter et al., 1970
Oose:                  15328.000
Duration Exposure:      14.0 days
Duration Observation:  14.0 days
RECORD 112:


Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Rats
Hale
NOAEL
Inhalation
Dose:
Duration
Duration

Exposure:
Observation:

2737.000
2.0 weeks
2.0 weeks

               Number Exposed:     NR       NR
               Number Responses:   NR       NR
               Type of Effect:     ENZYH    HISTO
               Site of Effect:     LIVER    LIVER
               Severity Effect:    1        3

Comment:       Concentrations: 200. 1000. 2000 ppm  6  hours/day.  S  days/week.
               Altered  enzyme  activity;   light   microscopy   no   effects;
               electron microscopy  slight  to moderate changes In endoplasmlc
               retlculum In liver cells.

Citation:      Valnlo et al.. 1980
RECORD 113:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:   Rats
Sex:      . Hale
Effect:    NOEL
Route: Inhalation

Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:

See record #12.

Valnlo et al., 1980
                  Oose:                  274.000
                  Duration Exposure:     2.0 weeks
                  Duration Observation:  2.0 weeks
                                   NR
                                   0
0275d
                     -84-
                                           11/15/89

-------
RECORD |14:
Species:   Mice
Sex:       NR
Effect:    PEL
Route: Inhalation
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
728061.000
1.0 days
1.0 days

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD |15:

Comment:
Citation:
RECORD 116:

Comment:
Citation:
Number Exposed: NR
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: DEATH
Site of Effect: BODY
Severity Effect: 10
Two-hour LC5Q value > 95000 ppm.
Oesollle et al.. 1968
Species: Guinea pigs Dose:
Sex: NR Duration Exposure:
Effect: FEL Duration Observation:
Route: Inhalation
Number Exposed: NR
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: DEATH
Site of Effect: BODY
Severity Effect: 10
Two-hour LC5Q value - 120,000 ppm.
Desollle et al.. 1968
Species: Rats Dose:
Sex: NR Duration Exposure:
Effect: FEL Duration Observation:
Route: Inhalation
Number Exposed: NR
Number Responses: NR
Type of Effect: DEATH
Site of Effect: BODY
Severity Effect: 10
Two-hour LC5Q value - 110.000 ppm.
Oesollle et al.. 1968



919656.000
1 .0 days
1 .0 days



843018.000
1 .0 days
1.0 days



0275d
                     -85-
                          11/15/89

-------
 RECORD
Comment:


Citation:
 Species:
 Sex:
 Effect:
 Route:
Rats
NR
LOAEL
Inhalation
Dose:                  21075.000
Duration Exposure:      1.0 days
Duration Observation:  1.0 days
Number Exposed:     NR
Number Responses:   NR
Type of Effect:     BEHAV
Site of Effect:     CNS
Severity Effect:    7

Reversible  CNS  effects  observed  during  6-hour  exposure  to
11,000 ppm.

Steinberg et al.. 1969
RECORD |18: Species: Dogs
Sex: NR
Effect: LOAEL



Route: Inhalation
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
NR
NR
BEHAV
.CNS
7
Dose: 24907.000
Duration Exposure: 1.0 days
Duration Observation: 1.0 days






Comment:       Reversible  CNS  effects  observed  during  6-hour  exposure  to
               13.000 ppm.

Citation:      Steinberg et al.. 1969
RECORD 119:
Comment:


Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Humans
Hale
FEL
Inhalation
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
980967.000
1.0 days
1.0 days
Number Exposed:     1
Number Responses:   1
Type of Effect:     DEATH
Site of Effect:     CAROV
Severity Effect:    10

Occupational accident report. Worker exposed  to  about  128.000
ppn for less than 45 minutes dfed due to cardiac arrest.

Hay and Blotzer. 1984
0275d
                     -86-
                                           11/15/89

-------
RECORD 120:
Comment:
Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Dogs
NR
LOAEL
Inhalation
Dose:                  38319.000
Duration Exposure:      1.0  days
Duration Observation:   1.0  days
Number Exposed:     29
Number Responses:   10
Type of Effect:     FUND
Site of Effect:     CAROV
Severity Effect:    7

Cardiac  arrhythmias  observed   In  unanesthetlzed  dogs  given
Injections  of  eplnephrlne  with  10-mlnute exposure  to  5000
ppm, "cardiac sensltlzatlon.11

Relnhardt et al., 1973
RECORD 121:


Species:
Sex:
Effect:
H1ce
NR 7
LOAEL '*•
Dose:
Duration
Duration

Exposure:
Observation:
766380.000
1.0 days
1 .0 days
Route: Inhalation
Comment:


Citation:
Number Exposed:     3
Number Responses:   3
Type of Effect:     FUND
SHe of Effect:     CARDV
Severity Effect:    7

Cardiac  arrhythmias   In   anesthetized   mice   given   6-m1nute
exposure to  100,000 ppm and  Injections of eplnephrlne.

Avlado and Belej.  1974
RECORD 122: Species: Dogs
Sex: NR
Effect: AEL



Dose: 76638.000
Duration Exposure: 1.0 days
Duration Observation: 1.0 days
Route: Inhalation
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
SHe of Effect:
Severity Effect:
NR
NR
FUND
CARDV
7





Comment:

Citation:
£€50 value of 10.000 ppm for
eplnephrlne: S-m1nute exposure.
Clark and Tlnston. 1973
cardiac sensltlzatlon to


 0275d
                      -87-
                                                                      11/22/89

-------
RECORD 123:
Comment:
Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Monkeys
NR
AEL
Inhalation
               Number  Exposed:      NR
               Number  Responses:    NR
               Type of Effect:      FUND
               Site of Effect:      CAROV
               Severity Effect:     7
Dose:
Duration Exposure:
Duration Observation:
191595.000
1.0 days
1.0 days
Five-minute   exposures
arrhythmias, myocardlal
exogenous eplnephrlne.

BeleJ et al.. 1974
               to   25,000   ppm   caused   cardiac
              depressions  and  tachycardia  without
RECORD 124: Species: Humans
Sex: Hale
Effect: LOAEL



Dose: 19160.000
Duration Exposure: 1.0 days
Duration Observation: 1.0 days
Route: Inhalation
Number Exposed:
Number Responses:
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:
2
2
MOTOR
CNS
7





Comment:        Impaired   psychomotor  function  during  2-hour  exposure   to
               concentrations at or  above 2500 ppm.

Citation:       Stopps  and Mclaughlin.  1967
RECORD 125:
Comment:

Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Humans
Male
NOEL
Inhalation
Dose:                  11496.000
Duration Exposure:     1.0 days
Duration Observation:  1.0 days
Number Exposed:     2
Number Responses:   0
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:    7

See Record |24.

Stopps and Mclaughlin. 1967
0275d
                     .88-
                                            11/15/89

-------
RECORD #26:
Comment:
Citation:
Species:
Sex:
Effect:
Route:
Humans
Hale
NOEL
Inhalation
Dose:                  992.000
Duration Exposure:     2.0 weeks
Duration Observation:  2.0 weeks
Number Exposed:     4
Number Responses:   0
Type of Effect:
Site of Effect:
Severity Effect:    4

Exposure protocol:  500 ppm,  6 hours/day,  5  days/week  for  1
week,  then  1000  ppm,  6  hours/day.  5  days/week for  1  week.
Estimated   dose  Is  average  expanded  cone.   No effects  on
psychomotor function or physical exam.

Relnhardt et al., 1971b
NR . Not reported
 0275d
                                      -89-
                                                                       11/15/89

-------