N.J.,  I.F.R. 1751-1800                    Issued May 1976
 UNITED  STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
               OFFICE  OF ENFORCEMENT
          OFFICE OF GENERAL ENFORCEMENT
          PESTICIDES ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
      NOTICES OF JUDGMENT UNDER THE FEDERAL
    INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE,  AND RODENTICIDE ACT
                     Nos.  1751-1800
     Notices of  Judgment report cases involving seizure  actions
taken against products alleged to be in violation, and criminal and
civil  actions taken  against  firms or individuals  charged to be
responsible  for violations. The following Notices of Judgment are
approved for publication as provided in Section 16(d) of the Federal
Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended (7 U.S.C.
136n).
Stanley W. Legro
Assistant Administrator for
Enforcement

Washington, D.C.

-------
1751. In Re:  The  Butcher Polish  Company,  EPA Region  I,
     October  3,  1975. (I.F.&R. No.  I-22C,  I.D. Nos.  89049,
     102810 and 102831.)

This was a  civil action charging  the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(1)(E). The action pertained to a shipment made on January
15, 1973, from Maiden, Massachusetts, to Hartford,  Connecticut,
and to products held for distribution  or sale on September 7 and
October  18, 1973, at The Butcher Polish Company, Marlborough,
Massachusetts. The pesticides involved were BUTCHER'S SURFACE
DISINFECTANT  SPRAY  and  BUTCHER'S  PROBE  PHENOLIC
GERMICIDAL  DETERGENT; the  charge  was  misbranding—
ineffective when used as directed.

The  respondent signed a Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $5,000.00.
1752. In Re: Cosan Chemical Co., EPA Region II, May 21, 1975.
     (I.F.&R. No. II-69C, I.D. No. 117714.)

This was  a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l){E) and 136{q)(l)(G). The action pertained to a product held
for distribution or sale on May 3, 1974, at Cosan Chemical Co.,
Clifton, New Jersey. The pesticide involved was COSAN PMA-100-
WSB; the charge was misbranding—lack of adequate precautionary
statements on labels.

The respondent signed  a  Consent Agreement. The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,500.00.
                            1184

-------
1753. In Re: Eight-ln-One Pet Products, EPA Region II, May 29,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. 1I-63C, I.D. Nos. 113902 and 113903.)

This was  a civil action charging  the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135(b). The action pertained to a shipment made on
August  13,  1973,  from  Brentwood,  New  York,  to Lakewood,
Colorado. The pesticides involved were PERFECT COAT WHITE PET
SHAMPOO and PERFECT COAT PREMIUM PET SHAMPOO; the
charge was nonregistration.

The  respondent  signed a Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $4,200.00.
1754. In Re: Airwick Industries, EPA Region II, July 2, 1975.
     (I.F.&R. No. II-59C, I.D. Nos. 91905,  118073, 118074 and
     118076.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(l)(G); 136(q)(l)(A) and 136(q)(2)(A). The action
pertained  to products held for distribution or sale on July 1, 1974,
and September  19,  1973,  at  Airwick  Industries, Carlstadt, New
Jersey. The pesticides involved were BACK-TEX RUG SHAMPOO
and AIRKEM A-3; the charge was misbranding—lack of adequate
precautionary statements, lack of adequate ingredient statement and
labels bore unwarranted safety claims.

The respondent  signed  a  Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $4,500.00.
 1755. In  Re: Mobil Chem. Co., EPA Region II,  July 7, 1975.
     (I.F.&R. No. II-65C, I.D. Nos. 117326,117327 and 117328.)

 This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
 135a(a)(l);  135(b);  136j(a)(l)(E)  and   136(q)(2)(A).  The  action
                             1185

-------
pertained to a shipment made on April 29,  1975, from Edison, New
Jersey, to Baltimore, Maryland. The pesticides involved were MOBIL
COATING VINYL ANTI-FOULING PAINTS: DARK BROWN 59D-
22, DARK  RED 59R-25 and BROWN 59-D-20; charges included
nonregistration and misbranding—lack of ingredient statement.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $8,400.00.
1756. In Re: Brilco Laboratories, EPA Region II, July 17, 1975.
     (I.F.&R. No. II-80C, I.D. No. 117583.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(1) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made on
December 10, 1974, from Brooklyn, New York, to Washington, D.C.
The pesticide involved  was BRILCO  PINE  DISINFECTANT; the
charge was nonregistration.

The respondent  signed a  Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $210.00.
 1757. In  Re:  Givuadan Corporation, EPA Region II, July 24,
      1975. (I.F.&R. No. II-53C, I.D. No. 105194.)

 This was  a civil action charging  the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
 135a(a)(l); 135b; 136j(a)(l)(e) and 136(q)(2](a). The action pertained
 to a shipment made on January 3, 1974, from CLifton, New Jersey, to
 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The pesticide involved was JAPANESE
 BEETLE BAIT; charges included nonregistration  and misbranding—
 lack of ingredient statement.

 The  respondent signed a  Consent Agreement. The Final Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $1,500.00.
                             1186

-------
1758. In Re: Joncyn Manufacturing Corp., EPA Region II, July
     24,1975. (I.F.&R No. II-64C, I.D. No. 117395.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l); 135(b);  136j(a)(l)(e)  and  136(q){2)(A).  The  action
pertained to a  shipment made on May 22,  1974, from Central Islip,
New York, to Salladasburg, Pennsylvania. The pesticide involved was
JANCYN  MAIN  LINE  CLEANER  AND ROOT  DESTROYER;
charges   included   nonregistration  and  misbranding—lack  of
ingredient  statement.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $ 1,125.00.
1759. In Re: Perfection Beauty Products, Inc., EPA Region II,
     August 5,1975. (I.F.&R. No. II-78C, I.D. No. 118172.)

This  was a civil action charging the  respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7 U.S.C.
135a(a)(1) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made on
July  24,  1974, from Pearl River, New York,  to Jersey  City,  New
Jersey.   The  pesticide   involved   was  TRIPLE  CEE   PINE
DISINFECTANT; the charge was nonregistration.

The  respondent signed  a Consent  Agreement.  The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $330.00.
1760. In Re: Long Island Paint and Chemical Co., EPA Region II,
     August 14,1975. (I.F.&R. No. 81C, I.D. No. 106728.)

This was  a civil action charging the respondent with violating  the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C.
136a(a);  136|(a)(l)(A);  136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(2)(A). The action
pertained to a shipment made on April 4, 1974, or May 21, 1974, or
June 31,  1974, from Glen Cove, New York, to Greenville, Rhode
Island. The pesticide involved was ISLAND SPA ANTI-FOULING
                            1187

-------
COPPER BOTTOM PAINT; charges included nonregistration  and
misbranding—lack of ingredient statement on labels.

The respondent signed a  Consent  Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $720.00.
1761. In Re: American Cyanamid Co., EPA Region II, September
     16,1975. (I.F.&R. No. II-73C, I.D. No. 106702.)

This was  a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act,  7 U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made on
July 24, 1974, from Linden, New Jersey, to San Antonio, Texas. The
pesticide   involved  was  CYTHION  THE  PREMIUM  GRADE
MALATHION 50% MFG.  CONCENTRATE;  the charge  was
nonregistration.

The Final Order on Default assessed a civil penalty of $3,080.00.
1762. In Re: Ecological and Specialty Products, EPA Region II,
     September 18, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. II-98C, I.D. No. 117870.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7 U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The  action pertained to a shipment made on
June 6, 1975, from Peterson, New Jersey, to Peekskill, New York. The
pesticide involved was CREOSOTE WOOD PRESERVATIVE; the
charge was nonregistration.

The  complaint  was  withdrawn  due  to  evidence  submitted  by
respondent showing that the product was  registered at the time of
shipment.
                            1188

-------
1763. In Re: Lerro's Soap & Chemicals, Inc., EPA Region III, July
     16, 1975.  (I.F.&R. No. III-50C, I.D.  Nos. 105179  and
     105180.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent  with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j{a)(l)(E);  136(q)(l)(F); 136(q](2)(c)liii); 136(q){2)(A); 136(q)[l)(A)
and  136(q)(l)(G).  The  action  pertained  to products  held  for
distribution or sale on  December  10,  1973, at Lerro's Soap &
Chemicals, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The pesticides involved
were LIGHTNING  RESIDUAL SPRAY and NON TOXIC INSECT
SPRAY; the charge was misbranding—'-lack of adequate warning or
caution statement, lack of  adequate directions for use, lack  of
adequate ingredient statement, lack of  statement of net weight or
measure of content and labels bore a false or misleading statement.

The  respondent  signed a Consent Agreement.  The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,500.00.
1764. In Re: Pennyfeather Corp., EPA Region III, July 30, 1975.
     (I.F.&R. No. III-68C, I.D. No. 115402.)

This  was a civil action  charging the  respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made on or
about  January  7,  1974,  from Greenville,  Delaware, to Portage,
Michigan. The pesticide involved was  PENNYFEATHER SQUILL
SQUIRREL REPELLANT; the charge was nonregistration.

The  respondent  signed a Consent Agreement.  The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $500.00.
                            1189

-------
1765. In Re: Elco Manufacturing  Company, EPA Region III,
     August  1,  1975. (I.F.&R. No. III-33C, I.D.  Nos. 104438,
     104439,104440,104443,104445 and 104459.)

This  was a  civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(l)(D) and 136(q)(2)(C)(v). The action pertained to
products held for distribution or sale on August 21, 1973, at Elco
Manufacturing Company, Sharpsburg, Pennsylvania. The pesticides
involved were ELCO DURSBAN INSECTICIDE IE, ELCO DURSBAN
INSECTICIDE 2E,  ELCO CIDE BUG  SPRAY, ELCO  TERMITE
KILLER  EMULSIFIABLE CONCENTRATE, LUMBER  LAST and
ELCO CREOSOTE; charges included claims and directions for use
differed in substance from  the representations made in connection
with  its registration and misbranding—lack of adequate warning or
caution statements and lack of the assigned registration numbers on
labels.

The  respondent  signed a  Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $ 1,860.00.
1766. In Re: Perk Products Company, EPA Region IV, June 5,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-68C, I.D. No. 95628.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)n)(E}; 136(c)(l) and 136tq)HMA). The action pertained to a
product  held for distribution or  sale on October 29, 1973, at Perk
Products Company, Nashville, Tennessee. The pesticide involved was
PERKERSON'S TRICHLOR WEED  KILLER,  charges  included
adulteration  and  misbranding—strength or purity fell below  the
professed standard of quality as expressed on its labeling.

The respondent signed a Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $ 120.00.
                            1190

-------
1767. In Re: H.A. Cole Products Company, EPA Region IV, July
     16,  1975.  (I.F.&R. No.  IV-77C, I.D.  Nos.  114758  and
     116555.)

This was  a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act, ~7  U.5.C.
135a(a)(l) and 136j(a)(l)(E). The action pertained to a shipment made
on  April  10,  1974(  from Jackson,   Mississippi to  Shreveport,
Louisiana, and to a product held for distribution or sale on February
13, 1974,  at H.A.  Cole Products Co., Jackson, Mississippi. The
pesticides  involved  were  NEW  HOMEMAKERS  CLEANER
DISINFECTANT  and  H.A.   COLE   FYNE-PYNE   PINE   OIL
DISINFECTANT; charges included nonregistration, adulteration and
misbranding—strength or purity fell below the professed standard of
quality as expressed on its labeling.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,575.00.


1768. In  Re: Sanco Products Company, EPA Region IV, July 16,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-72C, I.D. No. 94712.)

This was a civil  action charging the respondent  with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and   Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136(q)(l)(E); 136j(a)(l)(E); 136(q](2)(Q(iv) and 136(q)(l)(A). The action
pertained to a product held for distribution or sale on October 24,
1973, at Sanco Products Company, Macon, Georgia. The pesticide
involved  was SANCO PRODUCTS RINS-O-DINE; the charge was
misbranding—lack of adequate directions for use and labels failed to
bear the assigned registration number.

The respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement. The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,650.00.
                             1191

-------
1769. In Re: Texize Chemical Co., EPA Region IV, July 16, 1975.
     (I.F.&R. No. IV-125C, I.D. No. 116986.)

This was a civil action  charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(A). The action pertained to a product held
for distribution  or  sale on  March  12, 1975, at Texize Chemical
Company, Greenville, South Carolina. The  pesticide involved was
TEXIZE  PINE POWER TYPE DISINFECTANT CLEANER, the charge
was misbranding—product was ineffective when used as directed on
labeling.

The respondent  signed a  Consent  Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $ 1,680.00.
1770. In Re: Hunt and Company, Inc., EPA Region IV, July 17,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-129C, I.D. No. 117078.)

This was a civil action charging the  respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C.
1 36j(a)( 1 )(E) and 136(c}( 1). The action pertained to a product held for
distribution or sale on February 10, 1975, at Hunt & Company, Inc.,
Greensboro, North  Carolina. The pesticide involved was MAINLINE
DISINFECTANT, CLEANER AND DEODORANT; the charge was
adulteration—chemical deficiency.

The respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,428.00.
1771. In Re:  FHW  Toxicology & Biology Laboratories, EPA
     Region IV, August 5, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-115C, I.D. No.
     117114.)

This  was a civil action  charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a){ 1 )(E} and 136(c)( 1}. The action pertained to a product held for
distribution or sale on August  15, 1974,  at FHW Toxicology  &
                            1192

-------
Biology Laboratories,  Casselberry, Florida. The pesticide involved
was FB; the charge was adulteration—chemical deficiency.

 ne  respondent signed  a Consent  Agreement. The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $500.00.
1772. In Re: MAT Chemicals, Inc., EPA Region IV, August 5,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-127C, 1.0. No. 117815.)

This was a civil  action charging  the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E);  136(q)(l)(G); 136lq)(2)(C)(iv) and 136(q)(2)(C)(iii). The
action pertained to a shipment made on February 14, 1974, from
Carrotlton, Kentucky, to Newark, New Jersey. The pesticide involved
was BIOMET-14; the charge was misbranding—labels failed to bear
adequate precautionary  statements, an ingredient statement, the
assigned registration number and a statement of net contents.

The respondent  signed a  Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $3,640.00.
 1773. In Re: Tobacco States Chemical Co., EPA  Region IV,
     August 5,1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-130C, I.D. No. 107090.)

 This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
 136(q)(l)(F). The action pertained to a product held for distribution or
 sale on September 12, 1974, at Tobacco States Chemical Company,
 Lexington, Kentucky. The pesticide involved was  20% LINDANE
 TRANSPLANTER SOLUTION; the charge was misbranding—lack of
 adequate directions for use.

 The respondent  signed a Consent Agreement.  The  Final Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $1,820.00.
                             1193

-------
1774. In Re: ABC Compounding Company, Inc., EPA Region IV,
     August 8, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-114C,  I.D. Nos. 117046,
     116965 and  117076.)

This  was  a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l];  135b;   136j(a)(l)(E);  136(q)(2)(C)(i);   136[c)(l)  and
136(q)(2)(Q(iv). The action pertained to shipments made on August 5,
1974, and January 16, 1975, from Atlanta, Georgia, to Raleigh and
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, and to a product held for distribution or
sale  on January 21,  1975, at ABC  Compounding Company, Inc,
Atlanta,  Georgia. The  pesticides involved were  DEODORANT
CRYSTALS PARADICHLOROBENZENE  100%f ALGICIDE, and
PINE ODOR  DISINFECTANT;  charges  included  nonregistration,
adulteration and  misbranding—strength  or purity fell  below the
professed standard of quality  as expressed on  its  labeling, lack of
name and address of manufacturer and assigned registration number
on labels.

The  respondent signed  a Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $ 1,800.00.
 1775.  In Re: Industrial  Chemical  & Supply Company, EPA
     Region IV, August 25, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-138C, I.D. No.
     110880.)

 This was a civil  action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
 136j(a)(l)(E);  136(q)(l)(A);  136(c)(l)  and  136(q)(l)(D). The  action
 pertained to a product held for distribution or sale on February 28,
 1975, at Industrial Chemical & Supply Company, Tampa, Florida. The
 pesticide involved  was PELICAN BRAND SANITIZER CLEANER;
 charges included adulteration and misbranding—strength or purity
 fell  below  the professed standard of quality as expressed on its
 labeling, product would be ineffective when used as directed and
 lack of assigned establishment registration number on labels.
                             1194

-------
The respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,820.00.
1776. In Re: Predicted Environments Division of Air-Shields,
     Inc., EPA Region IV, August 25,1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-118C,
     I.D. No. 116981.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating  the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E} and 136(q)(l)(A). The action pertained to a product held
for distribution  or sale  on  February  13,  1975,  at  Predicted
Environments Div. of  Air-Shields,  Inc.,  Moncks  Corner,  South
Carolina. The pesticide involved was VAPASEPTIC AIR SANITIZER
SURFACE DISINFECTANT; the charge was misbranding—product
ineffective when used as directed.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement.  The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,800.00.
  r77. In Re: Admiral Paint Co., EPA Region VI, November 7,
     1974. (I.F.&R. No. VI-20C, I.D. No. 104628.)

This  was a civil action  charging the respondent  with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and Rodenticide Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E);  136(q)(l)(A) and 136(c)(l). The action pertained to a
product held for  distribution or sale on November  11,  1973, at
Admiral Paint Co., Lake Charles, Louisiana. The  pesticide involved
was  CUTTY SARK MARINE COATINGS ANTI-FOULING PAINT
TD-1240-2  VINYL;   charges    included  adulteration    and
misbranding—strength or purity fell below the professed standard of
quality as expressed on its labeling.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement.  The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $ 1,400.00.
                            1195

-------
1778. In Re: Helena Chemical Co., EPA Region  VI, May 28,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. VI-41C, I.D. No. 106899.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E); 136(c)(l) and  136(q)(l)(A). The action pertained to a
product held for distribution or sale on August 16, 1974, at Helena
Chemical Co.,  West Helena, Arkansas. The pesticide involved was
HELENA ANIMAL HEALTH 5% SEVIN DUST, charges  included
adulteration and  misbranding—strength or  purity fell below the
professed standard of quality as expressed on its labeling.

The  respondent signed a  Consent Agreement.  The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,800.00.
 1779. In Re: Pioneer Chemicals, Inc., EPA Region VI, May 28,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. VI-33C, I.D. No. 112523.)

 This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
 136|(a}(1)(E);  136(e)(1) and 136(q)(1)(A). The action pertained to a
 product held  for distribution or sale on August 20, 1974, at Pioneer
 Chemicals, Inc., Ponca City, Oklahoma. The pesticide involved was
 P-501 DISINFECTANT  FUNGICIDE; charges included adulteration
 and misbranding—strength or  purity fell  below the  professed
 standard of quality as expressed on its labeling.

 The respondent signed  a Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $350.00.
 1780. In Re: Cotey Chemical Corp., EPA Region VI, June 30,
      1975. (I.F.&R. No. VI-35C, I.D. No. 114841.)

 This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C.
 136j(a)(l)(E); 136(c)(l) and 136(q)(l)(A). The action  pertained to a
 product held for distribution or sale on November 20, 1974, at Cotey
                             1196

-------
Chemical  Corp.,  Lubbock,  Texas.  The pesticide  involved  was
SWIMCIDE;  charges included  adulteration and misbranding—
strength or purity fell below the professed standard  of quality as
expressed on its labeling.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $270.00.
1781. In Re: Ozark Chemical Co.,  EPA Region VI, August 1,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. VI-37C, I.D. Nos. 114889 and 114890.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E);  136(q)(l)(A) and  136(c)(l). The action  pertained to
products held for distribution or sale  on May 16, 1974, at Ozark
Chemical Co., North Little Rock, Arkansas. The pesticides involved
were PEAK NO. 569 TOILET BOWL CLEANER and PEAK NO. 215
CLEANER-DISINFECTANT-DEODORIZER-FUNGICIDE;   charges
included adulteration and misbranding—strength or purity fell below
the professed standard of quality as expressed on its labeling.

The respondent signed a  Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $918.00.
1782. In Re: Chemtech Industries, Inc., EPA Region VI, August 6,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. VI-44C, I.D. Nos.  107130 and 107126.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with  violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E);  136(c)(l)  and 136(q)( 1)(A). The  action  pertained to
products held for distribution or sale  on  January 21,  1975, at
Chemtech Industries, Inc., Dallas, Texas. The pesticides involved were
ALGAE-OUT and WARD-OFF; charges included adulteration and
misbranding—strength or purity fell below the professed standard of
quality as expressed on its labeling.
                             1197

-------
The  respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,484.00.
1783.  In  Re: Stauffer Chemical Company, EPA  Region  VI,
     August 15,1975. (I.F.&R. No. VI-32C, I.D. No, 114690.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating  the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
13 5a(a)( 1). The action pertained to a shipment made on July 9, 1974,
from No.  Little Rock, Arkansas, to Bonham, Texas. The pesticide
involved was ASPON 25G; the charge was nonregistration.

The  respondent  signed  a  Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,700.00.
1784. In Re: Chempro Corporation, EPA Region VI, September
     9,1975. (I.F.&R. No. VI-49C, I.D. No. 107146.)

This was a civil action charging  the respondent with violating the
Federal   Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)[lME); 136(c}(l) and  136(q)<1)(A). The action pertained'Jo a
product held for distribution or sale on March 27, 1975, at Chempro
Corporation, Houston, Texas. The pesticide involved was JOMAX
MOLD  AND MILDEW REMOVER; charges included adulteration
and misbranding—strength or  purity  fell  below  the  professed
standard of quality as expressed on its labeling

The respondent  signed a  Consent  Agreement. The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $420.00.
1785.  In Re: The Rite Chemical  Co., Inc.,  EPA  Region  VI,
     September 9, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. VI-47C, I.D. No. 106355.)

This was a civil action charging  the respondent with  violating the
Federol  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(c)(l). The action pertained to a product sold by
                             1198

-------
The Rite Chemical Co., Inc., New Orleans,  Louisiana, on March 12
and/or April 3, 1975. The pesticide involved was BIG M BRAND
LEMON ODOR CLEANER; the charge was adulteration—strength
or purity fell below the professed standard of quality as expresed on
its labeling.

The  respondent signed a Consent Agreement. The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $550.00.
1786. In Re: Hart-Delta, Inc., EPA Region VI, September 23,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. VI-45C, I.D. No. 107158.)

This was a civil  action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(1)(E);  136(c)(l) and  136(q)(1)(A). The action pertained to a
product held for distribution or sale on February 18, 1975, at Hart-
Delta,  Inc., Baton Rouge, Louisiana. The pesticide involved  was D
TICK DUST;  charges included adulteration  and misbranding—
strength or purity fell below the professed standard  of quality as
expressed on its labeling.

The respondent signed  a  Consent Agreement. The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $650.00.
 1787. In Re: Kay Dee Feed Company, EPA Region VII, June 20,
      1974. (I.F.&R. No. VII-33C, I.D. No. 102718.)

 This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
 136j(a)(1)(E);  136(q)(1)(A) and  136(c)(1). The action pertained to  a
 product held for distribution or sale on November 27, 1973, at Kay
 Dee Feed Company, Sioux City, Iowa. The pesticide involved was
 KAY   DEE   FLYDETS;   charges   included   adulteration  and
 misbranding—strength or purity fell below the professed standard of
 quality as expressed on its labeling.
                             1199

-------
The respondent signed a  Consent  Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,100.00.
1788.  In  Re: Diamond Vogel  Paint Co., EPA  Region  VII,
     November 20, 1974. (I.F.&R. No. VII-52C, I.D. Nos. 114975
     and 115159.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act,  7 U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to shipments made on or
about February 12 and  22, 1974, and  February 25, 1975,  from
Burlington, Iowa, to North Aurora, Illinois, and East Peoria, Illinois.
The pesticides involved  were  DIAMOND VOGEL  FARM AND
FENCE CREOSOTE PAINT WHITE 855 and DIAMOND VOGEL
HOUSE  PAINT  "100" OUTSIDE  WHITE,  the  charge   was
nonregistration.

The  respondent  signed  a  Consent Agreement.  The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,244.00.
1789. In Re: Midwest Solvents Company, Inc., EPA Region VII,
     April 25,1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-99C, I.D. No. 119217.)

This  was a civil oction charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136a(a)
and  136j(a)(l)(A). The action  pertained to a  shipment made on
September   10,   1974,   from   Atchinson,   Kansas,  to  Boston,
Massachusetts.  The pesticide  involved  was  STAZ-TITE  SUPER
SMOOTH PRESIZED WALL PAPER PASTE, the  charge was non-
registration.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,200.00.
                            1200

-------
1790. In Re: The Parowox Company, EPA Region VII, July 11,
     1975. (I.F.AR. No. VII-126C, I.D. No. 114323.)

This was a civil action charging  the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and Rodenticide Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(2)(A) and 136(c)(l). The action pertained to a
product held for distribution or sale on  November 6, 1974, at The
Parawax Company, Council Bluffs, Iowa. The pesticide involved was
SANITROL-CLEANER-GERMICIDE-DEODORtZER-DISINFECTANT;
charges included adulteration and misbranding—strength or purity
fell below the professed standard of quality as expressed  on  its
labeling.

The  respondent signed  a  Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $300.00.
 1791. In Re: Gibson-Homans Company, Des Moines, Iowa, EPA
     Region VII, July 14, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-123C, I.D. No.
     112339.)

 This was a civil  action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
 136jla)(2)(L) and  136e(c)( 1 )(A). The action pertained to  the firm's
 failure to submit a pesticides annual report in a timely manner.

 The respondent  signed a Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $750.00.
 1792. In Re: Elam Chemical Company, EPA Region VII, July 15,
      1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-122C, I.D. No. 112747.)

 This was  a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C.
 136(q)(l)(A); 136j[a)(l){E) and 136(c)(l). The action  pertained to a
 product held for distribution or sale on November 19, 1974, at Elam
 Chemical  Company,  Maryland  Heights,  Missouri. The  pesticide
 involved was ELAM DISINFECTANT-CLEANER; charges included
                             1201

-------
adulteration and  misbranding—strength  or  purity  fell  below the
professed standard of quality as expressed on its labeling.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $ 180.00.
1793. In Re: Dairy Chemical Company, EPA Region VII, August
     14, 1975.  (I.F.&R. No.  VII-131C,  I.D.  Nos. 87585 and
     1149030

This was a civil action  charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7   U.S.C.
136j(a)(1)(E); 136(q)(l)(G) and  135(a)(l). The action pertained to a
shipment made on or about March 26, 1974, from Fort Dodge, Iowa,
to Gushing, Oklahoma. The pesticide involved was DAIRY-CHEM
BORK'S DETERGENT-SANITIZER; charges included claims differed
in substance from representations made  in connection with  its
registration and misbranding—lack of adequate  warning or caution
statement on labels.

The  respondent  signed a  Consent  Agreement. The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,940.00.
1794. In Re: Missouri-Kansas Chemical Co., EPA Region VII,
     August 14,  1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-125C, I.D. Nos. 114230
     and 114561.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made on or
about October 30,  1974,  from Kansas City, Missouri, to Hedrick,
Iowa. The pesticide involved was CHEMICIDE; the charge was that
the claims  made  for  the product differed in  substance from the
representations made in connection with its registration.

The respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement.  The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $250.00.
                            1202

-------
1795. In Re: Chemogro Div. of Moboy Corp., EPA Region VII,
     August 18, 1975. (I.F.AR. No. VIM 28C, I.D. Nos. 114540
     and 114549.)

This was  a civil action charging the respondent  with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and Rodenticide  Act,  7 U S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(G). The action pertained to a product held
for distribution or sale on December 6, 1974, at Chemagro Div. Of
Mobay Corp., Kansas City, Missouri. The pesticide involved was
META-SYSTOX  50%  CONCENTRATE;  the   charge   was
misbranding—lack of adequate warning or caution statements on
labels.

The  respondent signed a  Consent Agreement. The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $3,080.00.
1796. In Re: B & K Company, EPA Region VII, September 4,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-136C, I.D. No. 107250.)

This was a civil action charging the  respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made on
March 24,  1975, from Marshalltown, Iowa, to San Antonio, Texas.
The pesticide involved was PHANTOM MECHANICS PERSONAL
HAND & ARM CLEANER; the charge was nonregistration.

The respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $100.00.
 1797. In Re: The Russell Company, EPA Region VII, September
     4,1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-137C, I.D. No. 119373.)

 This was a civil  action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136a(a)
 and  136j(a)(l)(A).  The action pertained to  a shipment made  on
 December  11,  1974,  from  St.  Louis,  Missouri,  to  Indianapolis,
                            1203

-------
Indiana. The pesticide involved was SCOOT DOG REPELLENT; the
charge was nonregistration.

The respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $100.00.
1798. In Re: Occidental  Chemical Company, EPA Region IX,
     August 11,1975. (I.F.&R. No. IX-74C, I.D. No. 111367.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(1)(E). The action pertained to a shipment made on September
4, 1973, from Lathrop, California, to Honolulu,  Hawaii. The pesticide
involved was MALAWET 25; charges included adulteration and
misbranding—strength or purity fell below the professed standard of
quality as expressed on its labeling.

The Final Order dismissed the charges since the inspector obtaining
the sample did not observe proper inspection procedures.
1799. In Re: Center Home and Garden Supply, EPA Region X,
     May 19,1975. (I.F.&R. No. X-14C, I.D. No. 113313.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a}(l) and 135b.  The action pertained  to a shipment made on
March 28, 1974, from Bellevue, Washington, to Moscow, Idaho. The
pesticide involved was CENTER BRAND WEED & FEED; the charge
was nonregistration.

The respondent  signed a  Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $480.00.
                             1204

-------
1800.  In  Re: -Nulife  Fertilizer  .Division of  Hygrode  Foods
     Products Corporation, EPA Region :X,  June 18, 1975.
     (I.F.&R. No. X-19C, I.D. No. 106683.)

This  was a civil action  charging the respondent  with'Violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  'Act,  "7  ,U:S.C.
136j(a)(1)(E) and 136(c)(l).The action pertained to.a,product held'for
distribution or sale on  September 4,  1974, at 'Nulife Fertilizer
Division, Tacoma, Washington. The pesticide involved was NULIFE
WEED AND FEED; the charge was adulteration.

The  respondent  signed a Consent  Agreement. The final Order
assessed a civil penalty of'$2,240.00.
                             1205

-------
           Index to Notices  of Judgment 1751-1800

                                                N.J.   No.

ABC Compounding Company,  Inc  (Civil)                 1774
Admiral Paint  Co.  (Civil)                                1777
Airwick  Industries (Civil)                                1754
American Cyanamid Co. (Civil)                          1761
B & K Company (Civil)                                1796
Brilco Laboratories (Civil)                                1756
Butcher  Polish  Company, The  (Civil)                     1751
Center Home and  Garden  Supply  (Civil)                 1799
Chemagro Div. Of Mobay  Corp. (Civil)                  1795
Chempro Corporation (Civil)                            1784
Chemtech Industries,  Inc. (Civil)                         1782
Cosan  Chemical Co.  (Civil)                              1752
Cotey Chemical  Corp.  (Civil)                            1780
Dairy Chemical Company (Civil)                         1793
Diamond Vogel  Paint Co. (Civil)                        1788
Ecological and  Specialty  Products
  (Civil)                                               1762
Eight-ln-One Pet Products (Civil)                         1753
Elom Chemical Company (Civil)                          1792
Elco Manufacturing Company (Civil)                      1765
FHW Toxicology & Biology Labs (Civil)                   1771
Gibson-Homans  Company (Civil)                         1791
Givuadan Corporation  (Civil)                             1757
H.A. Cole  Products Company (Civil)                      1767
Hart-Delta,  Inc. (Civil)                                   1786
Helena  Chemical Co. (Civil)                             1778
Hunt and Company, Inc. (Civil)                         1770
Industrial Chemical &  Supply
   Company (Civil)                                      1775
Jancyn  Manufacturing  Corp. (Civil)                       1758
Kay Dee Feed Company (Civil)                          1787
Lerro's  Soap &  Chemicals,  Inc. (Civil)                    1763
Long Island Paint  and  Chemical
   Co.  (Civil)                                           1760
M  & T  Chemicals, Inc. (Civil)                           1772
Midwest Solvents  Company,  Inc. (Civil)                  1789
Missouri-Kansas Chemical  Co.  (Civil)                      1794
                               1206

-------
Mobil Chemical Co.  (Civil)                                1755
Nulife Fertilizer Division of  Hygrade
  Food  Products  Corporation (Civil)                       1800
Occidental Chemical Company  (Civil)                      1798
Ozark  Chemical Co. (Civil)                               1781
Parawax Company.  The (Civil)                           1790
Pennyfeather Corp. (Civil)                                1764
Perfection Beauty  Products,
  Inc.  (Civil)                                            1759
Perk Products Company (Civil)                            1766
Pioneer Chemicals,  Inc. (Civil)                            1779
Predicted  Environments  Division of
  Air Shields,  Inc.  (Civil)                                1776
Rite Chemical Co.,  Inc.,  The  (Civil)                      1785
Russell  Company, The  (Civil)                             1797
Sanco Products Company (Civil)                          1768
Stauffer Chemical Company (Civil)                        1783
Texize  Chemical  Co. (Civil)                              1769
Tobacco States Chemical Co.  (Civil)                      1773
                                1207

-------