N. J.,  I.F.R.  1801-1850              Issued September 1976
 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION  AGENCY
               OFFICE  OF ENFORCEMENT
          OFFICE  OF GENERAL ENFORCEMENT
          PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
      NOTICES  OF JUDGMENT UNDER THE  FEDERAL
    INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE,  AND RODENTICIDE ACT
                    Nos.  1801-1850
    Notices  of Judgment report coses  involving seizure  actions
taken against products alleged to be in violation, and criminal and
civil actions  taken against  firms or  individuals  charged to be
responsible for violations. The following  Notices of Judgment are
approved for publication as provided in Section 16(d) of the  Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended (7 U.S.C.
136n).
Stanley w. Legro
Assistant Administrator for
Enforcement

Washington, D.C.

-------
1801. In Re: Boston Chemical  Industries, Inc., EPA Region
     October 14,1975. (I.F.&R. No. I-19C, I.D. No. 88991.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and Rodenticide Act,  7  U.S.C.
135ala)(l); 135b;  136i(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(l)lA); and 136(q)t2HQ(iii). The
action pertained to a product held for distribution or sale on January
21, 1974, at Boston Chemical Industries, Inc., Boston, Massachusetts.
The  pesticide  involved was STETCO  PYNOL  DISINFECTANT;
charges  included  nonregistration  and  misbranding—lack  of
statement of net content, product ineffective when used as directed
and labels bore a false and misleading registration number.

The  respondent signed a Consent  Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a penalty of $4,350.00. Of  this, $2,500.00 was ordered to
be paid within 20 days. The balance was held in abeyance as follows:
The respondent will implement a described quality control  program.
Within six months the respondent will report the status of the program
and  explain any deviations from the terms of the Final Order. The
Regional Administrator, based on the  report and any inspections, will
make a finding  as to whether  the respondent is in substantial
compliance with the Final Order. If so, payment of the balance of the
penalty will be waived.
1802.  U.S.  v. Paulsboro Products, Inc.,  U.S.  District  Court,
     District of Connecticut, Criminal No. B-75-7, November 3,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. l-C-12, I.D. Nos. 67665, 85625, 69481,
     69528 and 74965.)

This was a criminal action  prepared  by EPA Region I charging the
defendant in a thirteen count information with violating the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Radenticide Act,  7 U.S.C. 135a(a)(5);
135(zKD;  135a(a)(l) and  136j(a)(l)(E).  The  action  pertained  to
shipments made on January 26, 1971; March  4, 1971; January 21,
1972;  June  22, 1972; and  January 24, 1973, from  Bridgeport,
Connecticut, to Providence, Rhode Island; Carlstadt, New Jersey;
Baltimore, Maryland; Dedham, Massachusetts; and  Providence,
Rhode Island. The pesticides involved were MODERN LIVING ROSE
                            1208

-------
AND FLOWER SPRAY; AIRKEM ASEPTICARE DISINFECTANT
ODOR COUNTERACTANT SPRAY; WEST AIR REFRESHER; and
MODERN LIVING ANT AND ROACH  KILLER; charges included
nonregistration, adulteration and  misbranding—strength or purity
fell below the  professed standard of quality as expressed on its
labeling,  product was  ineffective  when used as directed, lack of
adequate directions for use, lack of ingredient statement, labels bore
false or misleading registration number, and labels bore false or
misleading safety claims.

The defendant entered a plea of nolo contendere to counts 1 and 2.
The remaining counts were dismissed.

A fine of $400.00 was levied.
1803. In Re: Ortex Products, Inc.,  EPA Region II, August 25,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. H-72C, I.D. Nos. 109451 and 118406.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l); 135b; 136j(a)(l)(E) and  136(q)(2)(A). The action pertained
to shipments made on  August  23, and September 18, 1974, from
Newark, New Jersey, to Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and  Hicksville,
New York. The pesticides involved were WINTERIZING TABLETS,
WINTERIZING  POWDER  and  POOL  STAY.   WINTERIZER;
charges   included  nonregistration   and  misbranding—lack  of
adequate ingredient statement.

The respondent  signed a  Consent  Agreement. The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $7,500.00.
1804. In Re: Brewer Chemical Co., EPA Region II, September 26,
     1975. (I.F.&R No. H-96C, I.D. No. 117401.)

This was  a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(1); I35b;  136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(G).  The  pesticide
                            1209

-------
involved  was  ALTO  SAN  HCX  PORTABLE  SANITATION
DEODORANT; charges included nonregistration and misbranding—
lacked adequate warning or caution statement on labels.

The respondent  signed a  Consent  Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $200.00.
1805. In Re: Adelphi Industries, EPA Region II, November 24,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. II-91C, I.D. No. 107913.)

This was a civil action charging  the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C.  135b;
136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(G).  The action pertained to a shipment
made on May 13, 1975, from Carlstadt, New Jersey, to Patchogue,
New York. The  pesticide involved was MARINE FINISHES ANTI-
FOULING   RED   BOTTOM   COPPER;   charges   included
nonregistration  and misbranding—lack  of adequate  warning or
caution statement.

The respondent  signed a Consent Agreement, admitting guilt. Zero
penalty was assessed since the firm has been liquidated.
1806.  In  Re:  Lethelin  Products  Co.,  Inc., EPA  Region  II,
     November 26,1975. (I.F.&R No. II-79C, I.D. No. 119237.)

This was a civil action charging the  respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l}(E); 136(q)(l)(A) and  136(c)(3). The action pertained to a
shipment made on March 22, 1974, from Mount Vernon, New York,
to Cromwell, Connecticut. The pesticide involved was LILLY'S ANT
TRAP   WITH  KEPONE;  charges  included  adulteration  and
misbranding—strength or purity fell below the professed standard of
quality as expressed on its labeling.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $400.00.
                            1210

-------
1807. U.S. v. Blue Spruce  Company, Inc., U.S. District Court,
     Newark, New Jersey, Criminal  No. 74-387, October 15,
     1975. (I.F.&R No. II-5-P, I.D. No. 95989.)

This was a criminal action prepared by  EPA Region II charging the
defendant  in a five count information  with violating the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act, 1 U.S.C. 135a(o)(l);
135a(a)(2)(c) and  135a(a)(5). The action pertained to  a shipment
made on September 8, 1971, from Basking Ridge, New Jersey, to
Caribou, Maine. The pesticide  involved  was CHEMOX GENERAL
WEED KILLER; charges included nonregistration and misbranding.

The defendant entered a plea of guilty to counts 1 and 4.  The
remaining counts were dismissed.

A fine of $ 1,000.00 was levied.
1808. In Re: Pittsburgh Sanitary Chemical Co., EPA Region III,
     October 28,1975. (I.F.&R. No. III-75C, I.D. No. 109737.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act, 7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E);  136(c)(l) and 136(q)(l}(A). The action pertained to  a
product held for  distribution or sale, on  October 23,  1974,  at
Pittsburgh Sanitary Chemical  Co.,  Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The
pesticide  involved   was   GERM-O-CIDE;   charges  included
adulteration and  misbranding—strength or purity fell below the
professed standard of quality as expressed on its labeling.

The  respondent  signed a Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $700.00.
                            1211

-------
1809. In Re: Canton Chemical Company, EPA Region IV, August
     11,  1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-III-C,  I.D. Nos.  116464  and
     116348.)

This was  a  civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to shipments made on
April 9, 1973, and April 18, 1974, from Canton, North Carolina, to
Spartanburg, South Carolina,  and  Centre, Alabama. The pesticides
involved were SOUTHERN PINE INSECTICIDE CHLORDANE "72"
CONCENTRATE and SOUTHERN PINE COPPER NAPHTHENATE
WOOD PRESERVATIVE; the charge was nonregistration.

The respondent signed a Consent Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $595.00.
1810.  In  Re:  American  Cyanamid  Co.,  EPA  Region  IV,
     September 16,  1975. (I.F.&R.  No.  IV-137C, I.D.  No.
     110963.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with  violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C.
136i(a)(lJ(E);  136(q)(lKG); 136(q)(2)(AJ; 136(q)(2}(C)(iv);  136(c)(l) and
136(q)(l)(D). The action pertained to a product held for distribution or
sale  on March 21, 1975, at American Cyanamid Co., Charlotte,
North Carolina. The pesticide involved was AEROTEX PURIFYING
AGENT NO. 1; the charge was  misbranding—lack  of adequate
warning or  caution  statement,   ingredient statement,  assigned
registration  number,  name  and  address  of  manufacturer,  and
assigned establishment number on labels or containers.

The  respondent  signed a Consent  Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $3,600.00.
                           1212

-------
1811. In  Re: Control Products  Associated, EPA Region IV,
     October 17,1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-132-C, I.D. No. 110854.)

This was a civil action  charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(2)(G). The action pertained  to a product used on September
30, 1974, at Control Products Associated, Moultrie, Florida. The
pesticide involved was  SHELL TECHNICAL DIELDRIN; the charge
was using a pesticide in a manner inconsistent with its labeling.

The Final Order Upon Default assessed a civil penalty of $120.00.
1812. In Re: Chemical Processors, Inc., EPA Region IV, October
     23,1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-146-C, I.D. No. 116425.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(D). The action pertained to a product held
for distribution or sale on January 20, 1975, at Chemical Processors,
Inc.,  St. Petersburg, Florida. The pesticide involved was DUAL MP 10
MILDEW AND MOTH GAS; the charge was misbranding—lack of
adequate warning  or caution statement and lack of the assigned
establishment registration number.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $350.00.
1813. In Re: Howerton Gowen Chemicals, Inc, EPA Region IV,
     October 23,1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-145-C, I.D. No. 117056.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent  with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made on
May 6th or 7th, 1975, from  Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina, to
Emporia, Virginia. The pesticide involved was GOWEN'S LIQUID
CHLORINE; the charge was nonregistration.
                            1213

-------
The  respondent signed a Consent  Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,800.00.
 1814.  In Re:  Puritan  Chemical  Company,  EPA Region IV,
     November  11, 1975.  (I.F.&R. No. IV-149-C,  I.D.  No.
     110161.)

 This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
 136j(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(l}(G) and 136(q)(l)(D). The action pertained to a
 product held for distribution or sale  on January 9,  1975, at Puritan
 Chemical Co., Atlanta, Georgia. The pesticide involved was PURI-
 MIST SANITIZING FLOOR AND DUST MOP TREATMENT; the
 charge was misbranding—lack of required precautionary statements
 and lack of assigned establishment registration number on labels.

 The  respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement. The Final  Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $840.00.
1815. In Re: Weil Chemical Co., EPA Region IV, November 19,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-153-C, I.D. No. 110981.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C.
136j(a)(1)(E) and 136 (c)(l). The action pertained to a product held for
distribution or sale on June 4,  1975,  at Weil Chemical Company,
Memphis,  Tennessee. The pesticide involved was WS FOGGING
CONCENTRATE;  the  charge  was  adulteration—product  was
chemically deficient.

The respondent signed  a  Consent Agreement. The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $360.00.
                            1214

-------
1816. In Re: Champion International Corporation, EPA Region
     V, April 11, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-214C, I.D. Nos. 115415,
     115416 and 115419.)

This was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C.  136j(a)(l)(E);  136(q)(l)(F)  and  136(q)( 1 )(G). The  action
pertained to products held for distribution or sale on April 8, 1974, at
Champion  International  Corporation,  Kalamazoo,  Michigan.  The
pesticides involved were U.S. PLYWOOD MARINE WOODLIFE
and   two   products    known   as   WELDWOOD   PENTA
CHLOROPHENOL WOOD  PRESERVATIVE;  the charge  was
misbranding—inadequate  directions  for use,   and  inadequate
warning or caution statements.

The Final Order Upon Default assessed a civil penalty of $7,560.00.
1817. In Re: Jay Rodgers Company, EPA Region V, July 22,
     1975. (I.F.&R No. V-221C, I.D. No. 115409.)

This was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C 136j(a)(l)(E); 136(c)(1) and 136(q)(l)(A). The action pertained
to a product held for distribution or sale on March 6, 1974, at Jay
Rodgers Co., Detroit,  Michigan. The pesticide  involved was  JAY
RODGERS  INSECTICIDE  AND  REPELLENT;  charges  included
adulteration  and misbranding—strength or purity of the product fell
below the professed standard of quality and the labels bore a  false
registration number.

The respondent signed  a  Consent Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $750.00.
                            1215

-------
1818. In Re: Koboy Ammonia Products, Inc., EPA Region V, July
     21,1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-238C, I.D. No. 115955.)

This  was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C.  136j(a)(l)(E);  136(c)(l); 136(q)(l)(A)  and  136(q)(l)(G). The
action pertained to a product held for distribution or  sale on August
20,  1974, at Koboy Ammonia Products, Inc., Skokie, Illinois. The
pesticide involved was KAPCO  SANITIZOR;  charges  included
adulteration and  misbranding—strength or purity of product fell
below the professed standard of quality,  inadequate warning or
caution  statements and labels bore false or misleading safety claims.

The  respondent  signed a Consent  Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $270.00.
1819. In Re: Koos, Inc., EPA Region V, July 22,1975. (I.F.&R No.
     V-217C, I.D. No. 106307.)

This  was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating  the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C. 136j(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(l)(A) and 136(c)(l). The action pertained
to a  shipment made on March 6, 1973, from Kenosha, Wisconsin, to
Lincolnwood,  Illinois. The  pesticide involved was AGRO-CHEM
GROW   AND    CONTROL   18-4-8   WITH  CRABGRASS
PREVENTER;  charges  included  adulteration and misbranding—
strength or purity of product fell below the professed  standard of
quality as expressed on its labeling.

The  respondent  signed a Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,408.00.
                            1216

-------
1820. In Re: Conwoy Soap Products Company, EPA Region V,
     August 4,1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-232C, I.D. No. 114977.)

This was a civil action in which  the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act,  7
U.S.C. 136j(a)(1)(E)  and  136(q)(l)(F).  The action pertained  to  a
product held for distribution or sale on May 22, 1974, at Conway
Soap Products Co., Chicago, Illinois.  The pesticide involved was
CONWAY PINE DISINFECTANT; the charge  was misbranding—
inadequate directions for use.

The  respondent signed  a Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $500.00.
1821. In Re: Berman Chemical Co., EPA Region V, August 8,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-245C, I.D. No. 111127.)

This was a civil action in which the  respondent was charged with
violating the Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C. 135a(a)(1);  135b;  136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(2)(A). The action
pertained to a shipment made on September 3, 1974, from Toledo,
Ohio, to Phoenix, Arizona. The pesticide involved was BULL FROG
SAF-T-KLENZ; charges included nonregistration and misbranding—
label of product did not bear an ingredient statement.

The respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $480.00.
 1822. In Re: Babson Brothers Company, EPA Region V, August
     12,1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-247C, I.D. No. 115836.)

 This was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
 violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
 U.S.C.  136j(a)(l)(E) and  136(q)(l)(G).  The action  pertained to a
 product held for  distribution or sale on September  11,  1974, at
 Babson Brothers Company, Oak Brook, Illinois. The pesticide involved
                            1217

-------
was  SURGE K.O. DYNE  IODINE DETERGENT; the  charge was
misbronding—inadequate warning or caution statements.

The  respondent  signed  a  Consent Agreement.  The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,156.00.
1823. In Re: Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc., EPA Region V,
     August 20,1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-206C, I.D. No. 87361.)

This was  a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating  the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C. 136j(a)(l)(E)  and 136(q)(l)(G). The action pertained to a
product held for distribution or sale  on July 17, 1973, at Cincinnati
Milacron  Chemicals, Inc., Reading Ohio. The pesticide involved was
CAR-BAN  T-O   BIOSTAT;  the  charge   was   misbranding—
inadequate warning or caution statements.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,512.00.
1824. In Re: N.B. Purdy, Inc., EPA Region V, August 20, 1975.
     (I.F.&R. No. V-242C, I.D. No. 115925.)

This- was a civil action  in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C  136j(a)(l)(E); 136(c)(l) and 136(q)(l)(A). The action pertained
to a product held for distribution or sale on November 12, 1974, at
N.B.  Purdy, Inc.,  Wauconda, Illinois. The pesticide involved was
STERA-SHEEN SANITIZER  AND  CLEANER  NO.  2; charges
included adulteration and misbranding—strength or purity of product
fell below the professed standard of quality as expressed on its
labeling.

The  respondent  signed a  Consent Agreement. The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $765.00.
                            1218

-------
1825.  In Re:  Arnott  Exterminators,  Inc., EPA  Region V,
     September 5r 1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-225C, I.D. No. 86990.)

This was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C.  136j(a)(l)(E)  and  136(q)(l)(A).  The action pertained  to a
shipment made on March 8, 1973, from  Indianapolis, Indiana, to
Florence, Kentucky. The pesticide involved was ARNCO POISON P-
NUTS;  the   charge  was  adulteration—product  contained an
additional active ingredient not claimed on the label.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $462.00.
1826. In Re: Dorex, Inc.,  EPA Region V, September 5,  1975.
     (I.F.&R. No. V-228C, I.D. No. 115056.

This  was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C. 135a(a)(l);  135b;  136j(a)(l)(E) and  136(q)(l)(A). The action
pertained to a shipment made on June 20, 1974, from Frankfort,
Illinois, to Madison, Wisconsin. The pesticide involved was NO. 203
BEER CLEANER SANITIZER; charges included nonregistration and
misbranding—labels bore a false or misleading registration number
implying that the product was registered.

The  respondent  signed a  Consent  Agreement. The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,560.00.
1827.  In Re:  Good-Way Insecticide, Inc.,  EPA Region  V,
     September 7,1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-222C, I.D. No. 92249.)

This was a civil action in which the respondent  was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C.  136j(a)(l)(E)  and  136(q)(l)(A).  The action  pertained  to a
product held for distribution or sale on February 5,  1974, at Good-
Way Insecticide, Inc., Arlington  Heights,  Illinois. The  pesticide
                            1219

-------
involved  was GOOD-WAY INSECT KILLER; charges included
adulteration and misbranding—strength or purity of the product fell
below the professed standard of quality as expressed on its labeling.

The respondent signed a Consent  Agreement. The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $270.00.
1828. In Re: Bell Laboratories, Inc., EPA Region V, September
     15, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-246C, I.D. Nos. 116017, 116018
     and 116019.)

This was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C.   136j(a)(1)(E). The action pertained  to  products held for
distribution or sale on November 20, 1975, at Bell Laboratories, Inc.,
Madison, Wisconsin. The pesticides involved were RODENT CAKE
CHOCOLATE  FLAVOR,  RODENT CAKE FISH  FLAVOR and
RODENT CAKE PEANUT FLAVOR; the charge was misbranding—
products were not effective when used as directed.

The respondent signed a Consent  Agreement. The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $300.00.
1829. In Re: Haviland Agricultural Chemicals Co., EPA Region
     V, September 15, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-230C, I.D. Nos.
     115366,115367,115368, and 115370.)

This was a civil action in which the  respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C.   136j(a)(l)(E);   136(c)(l);  136(q)[l)(G);  136(q)(2)(C);  and
136(q)(l)(F). The action pertained to products held for distribution or
sale on August 14, 1974, at Haviland Agricultural Chemicals Co.,
Grand   Rapids,   Michigan.   The   pesticides   involved  were
MALATHION DUST  NO.  5, CHLORDANE    EMULSIFIABLE
CONCENTRATE   8-E,  ROTENONE  DUST  NO.   100  and
CHLORDANE DUST  NO.  5;  charges  included adulteration and
misbranding—strength or purity fell below the professed standard of
                           1220

-------
quality as expressed on its labeling, lack of adequate warning or
caution statement, lack of assigned registration number and lack of
adequate directions for use.

The  respondent  signed a Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $4,320.00.
1830. In Re: Mid Stale Chemical and Supply Corp., EPA Region
     V, September 17, 1975.  (I.F.&R  No. V-212C, I.D. No.
     116545.)

This  was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C.  136a(a)(l);  136j(a)(l)(E) and  136(q)(l)(G).  The  action
pertained  to shipments  made on  May 9  and 23,  1974, from
Indianapolis, Indiana, to  Louisville, Kentucky. The pesticide involved
was  HY-CLOR  SODIUM  HYPOCHLORITE, charges  included
nonregistration and misbranding—inadequate warning or caution
statements on labels.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $726.00.
1831. In Re: Vita Plus Corporation, EPA Region V, September
     18,1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-205C, I.D. No. 115149.)

This was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C.  136j(a)(l}(E)  and  136(q)(l)(F). The  action pertained to a
product held for distribution or sale on April 3, 1974, at Vita Plus
Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin. The pesticide involved was VITA
PLUS MANGE WET TREATMENT; the charge was  misbranding—
inadequate directions for use.

The respondent  signed a Consent Agreement. The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $792.00.
                            1221

-------
 1832.  In Re:  Northern  Instruments, Inc.,  EPA  Region V,
     September  23,  1975.  (I.F.&R.  No.  V-216C,  I.D.  No.
     117290.)

 This  was a civil action  in which  the respondent was charged  with
 violating the Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
 U.S.C    135a(a)(l);    136j(a)(l)(E);   136(q)(l)(G);   136(q)(2)(A);
 136(q](2)(C) and  136(q)(l)(A). The action pertained to a shipment
 made on February 27, 1973, from St. Paul, Minnesota, to Harrisburg,
 Pennsylvania. The  pesticide involved was  STOR-SAFE SPORTS
 GEAR   PROTECTION;  charges  included  nonregistration  and
 misbranding—lack  of adequate warning or  caution statements,
 ingredient statement and net content statement and label bore false
 or misleading safety claims.

 The  respondent signed  a  Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $500.00.
1833. In Re: Enterprise Paint Manufacturing Co., EPA Region V,
     September 26,1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-087C, I.D. Nos. 112603
     and 112604.)

This was  a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C.  135a(a)(l); 135b; 136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q){3](G). The action
pertained to a shipment made on March 10, 1974, from Chicago,
Illinois, to Norfolk, Nebraska. The pesticides involved were PENN
CRAFT GUARANTEED 8 YEARS ONE COAT and PENN CRAFT
GUARANTEED  5  YEARS  ONE   COAT;  charges  included
nonregistration and misbranding—lack of  adequate warning or
caution statement.

The respondent signed  a Consent  Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $500.00.
                            1222

-------
1834. In Re: Univar Corporation, EPA Region V, October 6,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-213C, I.D. No. 115228.)

This was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C. 136j(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(l)(A) and 136(c)(l). The action pertained
to a product held for  distribution or sale on May 13, 1974, at Lyon
Chemicals, Inc., Branch of Van Waters and Rogers Division of Univar
Corporation, St. Paul, Minnesota. The pesticide involved was LYON
SWIMMING POOL  ALGAECIDE; charges included misbranding
and adulteration—strength or purity of the product fell below the
professed standard of quality and  labels bore a false registration
number.

The respondent signed  a Consent Agreement. The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1800.00.
1835. In Re: Applied Biochemists, Inc., EPA Region V, October
     7,1975. (I.F.&R No. V-208C, I.D. No. 115054.)

This  was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C. 136j(a)(l)(E)  and  136(q)(l)(A).  The action  pertained  to  a
product held for distribution or sale on February 27, 1974, at Applied
Biochemists, Inc.,  Mequon, Wisconsin. The pesticide involved was
SWIMTRINE ALGAECIDE;  the  charge was misbranding—labels
bore false or misleading safety claims.

The  respondent  signed a Consent Agreement. The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $400.00.
1836. In Re: Kyanize Paints, Inc., EPA Region Vr October 22,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-240C, I.D. No. 116234.)

This was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C. 135a(a)(l).  The action pertained to a  shipment made  on
                            1223

-------
 August 29, 1974, from Springfield, Illinois, to Morris, Minnesota. The
 pesticide involved was KYANIZE LATEX REDWOOD FINISH; the
 charge was nonregistration.

 The respondent signed  a Consent Agreement.  The  Final  Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $1,920.00.
 1837.  In  Re:  Burgress Vibrocrafters,  Inc., EPA  Region  V,
     October 28, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-234C, I.D. Nos. 115167,
     115175 and 115188.)

 This was a civil action in which  the respondent was charged with
 violating the Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
 U.S.C  136j(a)(l)(E);  136j(a)(2)(l);  136(q)(l)(G);  136(q)(l)(A) and
 136(c)(lJ.  The action pertained to products held for distribution or
 sale on June 21, 1974, at Burgress Vibrocrafters,  Inc., Libertyville,
 Illinois.  The pesticides involved were 7-11 ANT POISON, CENOL
 BEE WASP YELLOW  JACKET HORNET  KILLER and CENOL
 POISONED WHEAT; charges included violation of a Stop Sale, Use
 or Removal Order, adulteration and misbranding—strength or purity
 fell below  the  professed standard of quality as expressed on  its
 labeling, product ineffective for purposes  claimed and lack  of
 adequate warning or caution statements on labels.

 The  respondent signed a Consent Agreement. The Final  Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $3,552.00.


 1838. In Re: Action Athletic Equipment, Inc., EPA Region V,
 October 31,1975. (I.F.&R. No. II-244C, I.D. No. 116061.)

 This was a civil action  in which the respondent was charged with
 violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
 U.S.C. 135a(aJ(l); 135b; 136j(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(l)(G); and 136(q)(2)(C).
The  action  pertained  to a  shipment made  on   December 18,
 1974,from  Rockford, Illinois,  to Cudahy, Wisconsin. The pesticide
involved was   MAT-SAN  DISINFECTANT  CLEANER;  charges
included nonregistration  and  misbranding—inadequate warning or
                            1224

-------
caution  statements, lack of net content statement or measure of
content and lack of an ingredient statement.

The  respondent signed a  Consent  Agreement. The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $925.00.
1839. In Re: Thompson-Hay ward Chemical Co., EPA Region VII,
September 30, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-127C, I.D. Nos. 112427,
112438,112439,112445, and 114618.)

This was  a  civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C.
136(q)(2)(D); 136(q)(l)(F); 135a(a)(l); 136j(a)(l)(E) and 136[q){l)(G).
The action pertained to a shipment  made on or about April 18, 1974,
from Kansas City, Kansas, to Holden, Missouri, and to products held
for distribution or sale  on September 3 and  4, 1974, at Thompson
Hayward Chemical Company, Kansas City, Kansas. The  pesticides
involved were DED-WEED LV-69, MERGE 823, DED-WEED FOR
LAWNS, SUPER FUMIGAS, and DED-WEED LV-9 BRUSH KIL; the
charge was misbranding—lack of adequate  warning  or caution
statements and lack of adequate directions for use on labels.

The respondent signed a Consent  Agreement. The Final  Order
assessed o civil penalty of $ 12,108.00.
1840. In Re: Western Chemical Co., EPA Region VII, September
     30,1975. (I.F.&R. No. VIM41-C, I.D. No. 114571.)

This was  a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act,  7 U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(G). The action pertained to a product held
for distribution or sale on January 29, 1975, at Western Chemical
Co.,  St. Joseph, Missouri. The pesticide involved was HERCULITE
DISINFECTANT, DETERGENT, AND CLEANER;  the charge was
misbranding—lack of warning or caution statement on labels.
                           1225

-------
 The respondent signed a  Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $1,848.00.
 1841. In Re: Airosol Company, Inc., EPA Region VII, October 8,
      1975. (I.F.&R. No. VIM42C, I.D. No. 125374.)

 This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
 136j(a}(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(G). The actfon  pertained to a shipment
 made on or about May 22,  1975, from Neodesha, Kansas,  to
 Madison, Wisconsin. The pesticide involved was AIROSOL BRAND
 INSECT REPELLENT SPRAY; the charge was misbranding—lack of
 adequate precautionary statements on labels.

 The  respondent signed a Consent  Agreement.  The Final  Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $800.00.
1842. In Re: Basic Chemicals, Inc., EPA Region VII, October 14,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. VM-103C, I.D. No. 115249.)

This  was a civil action charging the  respondent with violating the
Federal   Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C.
135a(a)(l); 136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(F). The action pertained to a
shipment  made on May 3,  1974,  from Des  Moines,  Iowa, to
Moorhead, Minnesota.  The pesticide involved  was  SAN-O-DIS;
charges    included   claims  differed  in  substance  from   the
representations  made  in  connection  with its  registration   and
misbranding—lack of adequate directions for use.

The  respondent signed a  Consent Agreement.  The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $350.00.
                            1226

-------
1843. In Re: Navy Brand Mfg. Co., EPA Region VII, October 14,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-139C, I.D. No. 114587.)

This was  a civil action charging the respondent  with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Radenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained  to a shipment made on
February 6, 1975, from St. Louis, Missouri, to Leewood, Kansas. The
pesticide involved was ROOT-OUT; the charge was nonregistration.

The respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,500.00.
1844. In Re: Vulcan Materials Co., Chemicals Division, EPA
     Region VII, October 22, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-148C, I.D.
     No. 114440.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating  the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(F). The action pertained  to a  shipment
made on  March 20,  1975,  from Wichita,  Kansas, to  St. Louis,
Missouri. The pesticide involved was LIQUID CHLORINE; the charge
was  misbranding—labeling lacked directions for use adequate to
protect health and the environment.

The civil complaint was withdrawn after it was determined that the
required labeling was located in the dome of the tank car.
1845.  In  Re: Consolidated Chemical,  Inc.,  EPA Region VII,
October 28,  1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-133C, I.D. Nos. 114443 and
119297.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l); 135b; 136j(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(l)(A); and 136(c)(l). The action
pertained  to shipments made on October 23, 1974, and  May 30,
1975, from St. Louis, Missouri, to Ellsworth, Maine, and  Godfrey,
                            1227

-------
Illinois.  The pesticides involved were  RENOVET  and GERMO-
PHENE; charges  included  nonregistration,  claims  differed  in
substance from  the  representations  made  in connection with its
registration, adulteration, and misbranding—strength or purity fell
below the professed standard of quality as expressed on its labeling.

The  respondent signed a  Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,700.00.
1846. U.S. v. 1312 eleven oz. cans, more or less, of a product
     labeled  in  part "Real Kill  Moth Proofer." U.S. District
     Court, Western District of Missouri, May 14,1975. (I.F.&R.
     No. 74 CV 493-W-4,1.D. No. 112659.)

This was a seizure action charging the product with being in violation
of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C.
135a(a)(l); 136k(b)(l)(B) and  136k(b)(3). The action pertained to a
product held for distribution or sale on March 15, 1974, at Wild
Woody's Bargain  Barn, Independence, Missouri. The  charge was
misbranding—when used as directed by the labeling it would cause
unreasonable adverse effects on the environment.

The Default Judgement Decree ordered destruction of the seized
product.
1847. In Re: Thatcher Chemical Co., EPA Region VIII, April 18,
1975.  (I.F.&R.  No.  VIII-6C, I.D. Nos.  101913,  101914 and
101915.)

This  was a civil  action charging the respondent with  violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E) and  136(q)(l)(A). The action pertained to a product held
for distribution or sale on August 21,1973, at Thatcher Chemical Co.,
Salt Lake City, Utah. The pesticide involved was T-CHLOR SODIUM
HYPOCHLORITE; the charge was misbranding—lack of adequate
warning or caution statements on labels.
                             1228

-------
The  respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement. The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $3,540.00.
1848. In Re: Fuller-O'Brien Corp., EPA Region IX, September 5,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. IX-50C, I.D. Nos. 74878 and 74879.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(1)(C) and 136j(a)(l)(E). The action pertained to products held
for distribution or sale on July 24,  1973, at Fuller-O'Brien Corp.,
South San Francisco,  California.  The pesticides involved were
309-04 OFF WHITE MILDEW RESISTANT ACRYLIC LAYTEX
FINISH  and  314-00  WHITE MILDEW RESISTANT  LAYTEX
ENAMEL; charges included claims and directions for use differed in
substance from the respresentations made in connection  with its
registration, adulteration  and misbranding—strength or purity fell
below the professed standard of quality as expressed on its labeling
and lack of adequate warning or caution statements.

The Final Order Upon Default assessed a civil penalty of $3,650.00.
1849. In Re: Honey Bee Enterprises, EPA Region X, September
11,1975. (I.F.&R. No. X-23C, I.D. No. 106693.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with  violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E). The action pertained to a product held for distribution or
sole on October 17, 1974, at Honey Bee Enterprises, Battleground,
Washington. The pesticide involved was MOLEX; charges  included
adulteration and  misbranding—strength or purity  fell  below the
professed standard of quality as expressed on its labeling.

The Final Order Issued  Upon Default assessed  a civil  penalty of
$280.00.
                            1229

-------
1850. In Re: S. V. Chemical Division of Universal Industries,
     Inc., EPA Region X, October 25,1975. (I.F.&R. No. X-25C,
     I.D.Nos. 113501,113502 and 113503.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E). The action pertained to products held for distribution or
sale on November 21, 1974, at S. V. Chemical Division of Universal
Industries, Inc., Tacoma,  Washington. The pesticides involved were
HI-KLOR,   SANI-QUAT,  and   STERISOL,  charges   included
adulteration and misbranding in that the product's strength or purity
fell below the standard of quality as expressed on its label.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,530.00.
                            1230

-------
          Index to  Notices of Judgment 1801 - 1850

                                                    N.J.  No.

Action Athletic Equipment,
  Inc.  (Civil)                                               1838
Adelphi Industries
  (Civil)                                                   1805
Airosol Company,  Inc.
  (Civil)                                                   1841
American  Cyanamid
  Company (Civil)                                         1810
Applied Biochemists,
  Inc.  (Civil)                                               1835
Arnott Exterminators,
  Inc.  (Civil)                                               1825
Babson Brothers Company
  (Civil)                                                   1822
Basic Chemicals,
  Inc.  (Civil)                                               1842
Bell  Laboratories,  Inc.
  (Civil)                                                   1828
Berman Chemical Company
  (Civil)                                                   1821
Blue Spruce Company,
  Inc.  (Criminal)                                           1807
Boston Chemical Industries,
  Inc.  (Civil)                                               1801
Brewer Chemical Co.
  (Civil)                                                   1804
Burgress  Vibrocrafters,
  Inc.  (Civil)                                               1837
Canton Chemical  Company
  (Civil)                                                   1809
Champion  International
  Corporation (Civil)                                       1816
Chemical  Processors,
  Inc.  (Civil)                                               1812
Cincinnati  Milacron Chemicals,
  Inc.  (Civil)                                               1823
Consolidated  Chemical,
                               1231

-------
   Inc. (Civil)                                               1845
 Control Products Associated
   (Civil)                                                   1811
 Conway Soap  Products Company
   (Civil)                                                   1820
 Dorex, Inc. (Civil}                                          1826
 Enterprise Paint Manufacturing
   Company (Civil)                                          1833
 Fuller-O'Brien  Corporation
   (civil)                                                    1848
 Good-Way  Insecticide,
   Inc. (Civil)                                               1827
 Haviland Agricultural Chemicals
 Company (Civil)                                           1829
 Honey Bee  Enterprises
   (Civil)                                                    1849
 Howerton Gowen  Chemicals,
   Inc. (Civil)                                               1813
 Jay  Rodgers Company  (Civil)                                1817
 Koboy Ammonia Products,
   Inc. (Civil)                                               1818
 Koos,  Inc. (Civil)                                           1819
 Kyanize  Paints, Inc. (Civil)                                  1836
 Lethelin Products Co.,
   Inc. (Civil)                                               1806
 Mid-State Chemical  and Supply
   Corp.  (Civil)                                              1830
 N.B.  Purdy,  Inc. (Civil)                                     1824
 Navy Brand Mfg. Company (Civil)                           1843
 Northern Instruments,
   Inc. (Civil)                                               1832
 Ortex  Products, Inc.  (Civil)                                  1803
 Paulsboro Products,  Inc. (Criminal)                           1802
 Pittsburgh Sanitary Chemical
   Co.  (Civil)                                               1808
 Puritan  Chemical Company (Civil)                            1814
Real Kill Moth  Proofer  (Seizure)                             1846
S.V. Chemical Division  of Universal
   Industries, Inc. (Civil)                                     1850
Thatcher Chemical Co.  (Civil)                                1847
Thompson-Hayward Chemical
   Company  (Civil)                                          1839
                               1232

-------
Univor Corporation (Civil)                                  1834
Vita  Plus Corporation (Civil)                               1831
Vulcan Materials Company, Chemicals
  Division (Civil)                                          1844
Weil Chemical Company (Civil)                            1815
Western Chemical  Company (Civil)                         1840
                               1233

-------