N.J.,  I.F.R. 1851-1900                 Issued October 1976
 UNITED  STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
               OFFICE OF ENFORCEMENT
          OFFICE  OF GENERAL ENFORCEMENT
          PESTICIDES AND TOXIC SUBSTANCES
                ENFORCEMENT DIVISION
      NOTICES  OF JUDGMENT UNDER THE  FEDERAL
    INSECTICIDE, FUNGICIDE,  AND RODENTICIDE ACT
                    Nos.  1851-1900
    Notices  of Judgment report cases  involving  seizure actions
taken against products alleged to be in violation, and criminal and
civil actions  taken against firms  or individuals charged to be
responsible for violations. The following Notices of Judgment are
approved for publication as provided in Section 16(d) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, as amended (7 U.S.C.
136n).
Stanley W. Legro
Assistant Administrator for
Enforcement

Washington, D.C.

-------
 1851.  In  Re: Trio  Chemical  Works,  Inc.,  EPA  Region  II,
     Ncvember 19, 1975. (I.F.ftR. No. II-67C, I.D. Nos. 117823
     and 118428.)

 This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
 135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to shipments  made on
 June 6 and October 1, 1974, from Brooklyn, New York, to Irvington,
 New Jersey. The pesticide involved was AMAZON CREOSOTE OIL;
 the charge was nonregistration.

 The respondent signed a Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $>, 100.00.
1852.  In Re:  Trio Chemical  Works,  Inc.,  EPA  Region II,
     November 19, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. II-74C, I.D. No. 116035.)

This was a civil action  charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E);  136(q)(1)(A);  136(c)(1)  and  136(c){2).  The  action
pertained to a shipment made on December 5, 1974, from Brooklyn,
New  York,   to  Chicago,  Illinois.  The  pesticide  involved  was
INSECTICIDE, AEROSOL,  SYNERGIZED PYRETHRIN; charges
included  misbranding and adulteration—its strength or purity fell
below the professed standard of quality as  expressed on its labeling
and the product contained an additional active ingredient not named
on the label.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,400.00.
1853. In Re: Hollowick, Inc., EPA Region II, November 24,1975.
     (I.F.&R. No. II-89C, I.D. No. 110436.)

This was  a civil action  charging the  respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act, 7 U.S.C.
135a(a)(l); 135b; 136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(1)(G). The action pertained
                            1234

-------
to a shipment made on July 30, 1974, from Manlius, New York, to
Altanta, Georgia. The pesticide involved was HOLLOWICK LAMP
FUEL; charges included nonregistration  and misbranding—lack of
adequate warning or caution statement.

The respondent  signed a Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $950.00.
1854. In Re: Ernesto S.  Barbosa, EPA Region II, December 8,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. II-71C, I.D. No. 118890.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,   Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 136j(a)(l)(E). The action pertained to shipments made
during the period January 1973 to December 1974, from Passaic,
New Jersey, to New York, New York. The pesticide involved was
PARATHION; charges included nonregistration and misbranding—
lack of any warning  or caution statement, ingredient statement, net
content  statement and  name  and  address  of the  producer or
distributor.

The respondent signed a Consent Agreement stipulating to no further
distribution of unregistered pesticides. No civil penalty was assessed
due to the financial condition of the respondent.
1855.  In  Re:  Eastern  Laboratories,  Inc.,  EPA  Region  II,
     December 16,1975. (I.F.&R. No. II-48C, I.D. No. 94499.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 136j(a)(l)(E). The action pertained to a shipment made
on September 25, 1973, from Vineland, New Jersey, to Minneapolis,
Minnesota.  The  pesticide  involved   was  EASTERN  LIQUID
SANITIZER CLEANER  FOR WASHING SOILED EGGS; charges
included nonregistration and misbranding—labels bore a false or
misleading registration  number  implying  that  the product was
registered.
                            1235

-------
The respondent signed a Consent Agreement. The Final Order forbids
the shipment of nonregistered pesticides, but did not assess a civil
penalty due to the firm's inability to pay.
1856. In Re: Rover Pet Products, EPA Region II, December 24,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. 3I-100C, I.D. No. 118093.)

This was a civil  action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(1)(E);  136(q)(l)(A) and 136(c)(l).  The action pertained  to a
product held for distribution or sale on July 23, 1974, at Rover Pet
Products,  Belleville, New  Jersey.  The  pesticide  involved  was
ROVER'S DOG SHAMPOO; charges  included  adulteration  and
misbranding—strength or purity fell below the professed standard of
quality as expressed on its labeling.

The respondent  signed a  Consent  Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $750.00.
1857. In Re: Dore-lnternational, Inc., EPA Region II, January 2,
     1976. (I.F.&R. No. II-88C, I.D. No. 107722.)

This was a civil action charging  the respondent with  violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7 U.S.C.
135a(a)(l); 135b; 136j(a)(l)(E)and 136(q)(l)(G). The action pertained
to a shipment made on February 6, 1975, from Brooklyn, New York,
to Totowaboro, New Jersey. The pesticide  involved  was DORE-
CHLOR; charges included nonregistration and misbranding—lack of
adequate warning or caution statement on labels.

The respondent  signed a Consent  Agreement.  The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $850.00.
                            1236

-------
1858. In Re: Zee Chemical Co., Inc., EPA Region llr January 2,
     1976. (I.F.&R. No. II-86C, I.D. No. 118041.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent  with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(l)(G); 136(q)(2)(A) and 136(q)(2)(C)(v). The action
pertained to a product held for distribution or sale  on April 30, 1974,
at Zoe Chemical Co., Inc., New Hyde Park, New York. The pesticide
involved  was JAYGOL  ROSE and FLORAL SPRAY BOMB; the
charge was misbranding—lack  of adequate  warning or  caution
statement on labels, lack of assigned registration number on labels
and lack of adequate ingredient statement on labels.

The respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed  a civil penalty of $720.00.
1859.  In  Re: Aquashade, EPA Region II, January 9, 1976.
     (I.F.&R. No. II-99C, I.D. No. 111039.)

This was a civil action  charging the  respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l); 135b; 136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(G). The action pertained
to a shipment made on March 5, 1975, from Dobbs Ferry, New York,
to Tampa,  Florida.  The  pesticide involved  was  AQUASHADE
AQUATIC GROWTH CONTROL; charges included nonregistration
and misbranding—lack of adequate warning or caution statement on
labels.

The respondent  signed a  Consent Agreement.  The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2f 0.00.
1860. In Re: Tenneco Chemicals, Inc., EPA Region II, January 9,
     1976. (I.F.&R. No. II-106C, I.D. No. 118264.)

This was  a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7 U.S.C.
136j(a)(1)(E);  136(q)(l)(A);  136(c)(l) and 136(q)(l)(G). The action
                            1237

-------
pertained to a product held for distribution or sale on July 17, 1974,
at Tenneco  Chemicals, Inc.,  Elizabeth,  New Jersey. The pesticide
involved was NUODEX 84; charges  included adulteration  and
misbranding—strength or purity fell below the professed standard of
quality  as expressed on its  labeling and labels lacked adequate
precautionary statements.

The  respondent signed a Consent  Agreement. The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $4,960.00.
1861. In Re: Utility Chemical Co., EPA Region II, January 15,
     1976. (I.F.& R. No. II-107C, I.D. No. 110890.)

This was a civil  action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C.
135a(a)(1); 135b;  136j(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(l)(G) and 136(q)(2)(A). The
action  pertained to a shipment made  on February 18, 1975, from
Paterson, New Jersey, to Largo, Florida. The pesticide involved was
GERMICIDE; charges included nonregistration and misbranding—
lack of  adequate precautionary statements and lack of ingredient
statement on labels.

The respondent  signed a  Consent Agreement.  The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $4,800.00.
 1862. In Re: Bixon Chemical Co., EPA Region II, January 16,
     1976. (I.F.&R. No. II-84C, I.D. Nos. 118445 and 118446.)

 This was a civil action charging  the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C.
 136j(a)(l)(E);  136(q)(l)(A) and 136(c)(l). The action pertained to a
 product held for distribution or sale on November 26, 1974, at Bixon
 Chemical Co., Corona, New York. The pesticides involved were K-
 GERM   DISINFECTANT   and    RESIDUAL    INSECTICIDE
 W/PYRENONE DIAZINON LIQUID; charges included adulteration
 and  misbranding—strength or  purity fell below  the  proposed
 standard of quality as expressed on its labeling.
                             1238

-------
The  respondent signed a  Consent Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $4,045.00.
1863. In Re: Bixon Chemical Co., EPA Region II, January 16,
     1976. (I.F.&R. No. II-85C, I.D. No. 118476.)

This was a civil  action charging  the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E);  136(c)(l); 136(q)(1)(A) and  136(q)(2)(Q(iii). The action
pertained  to a product held for distribution or sale on January 22,
1975, at  Bixon  Chemical Co., Corona, New York. The  pesticide
involved  was PINE  ODOR DISINFECTANT; charges  included
adulteration and misbranding—strength or purity fell below the
professed  standard of quality as  expressed on its labeling, product
would not act as  a disinfectant when used as directed and lack of net
content'statement on labels.

The  respondent  signed a  Consent Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $3,350.00.
1864. In Re: Arcal Chemicals, Inc., EPA Region III, February 13,
     1976. (I.F.&R. No. III-88C, I.D. No. 117609.)

This was a civil action charging  the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E);  136(q)(l)(A);  136(q)(l)(G)  and  136(q)(2)(C)(iii).  The
action pertained to a product held for distribution or sale on April 15,
1975,  at Arcal  Chemicals, Inc., Seat  Pleasant,  Maryland.  The
pesticide involved  was DIXICHEM THEY-GO INSECTICIDE; the
charge was misbranding—lack of adequate caution statement, lack
of statement of net weight and  labels bore a false or misleading
statement.

The respondent  signed a  Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $3,000.00.
                             1239

-------
1865. In Re: Bowman, Mell and Co., Inc., EPA Region  III,
     February 13,1976. (I.F.&R. No. III-87C, I.D. No. 109762.)

This was a  civil  action charging the respondent with violating  the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(o)(l)(E); 136(q)(l)(A) and 136(c)(l). The action pertained to a
product  held  for distribution  or sale  on January 28, 1975, at
Bowman, Mell and Co., Inc., Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The pesticide
involved was SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE  SOLUTION;  charges
included adulteration and misbranding—strength or purity fell below
the professed standard of quality as expressed on its labeling.

The  respondent signed a Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $500.00.
1866.  In Re:  Xare  Chemical  Company,  EPA  Region  IV,
     December 5,1975. (I.F.&R. No. IV-150-C, I.D. Nos. 110454,
     110455,110456,110192,110193, and 110194.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with  violating the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(1); 135b; 136j(a)(l)(E); 136(c)(l)and 136(q)(l)(A). The action
pertained  to shipments  made on May 20, 1974, and January 3,
February 18, January 27, and January 12, 1975, from Opa Locka,
Florida, to Newman, Georgia, and Oxford, Alabama. The pesticides
involved were 70% GRANULAR CHLORINE;  EAGLE ALGICIDE;
EAGLE 5%  CHLORDANE INSECTICIDE;  EAGLE  STABILIZED
POOL CHLORINE; EAGLE 10% CHLORDANE INSECTICIDE and
SUPER CHINCH  ETHION  LAWN  SPRAY;  charges included
nonregistration and adulteration—chemical deficiency  and chemical
overformulation.

The  respondent  signed a  Consent  Agreement.  The   Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $15,000.00.
                            1240

-------
1867. In Re: Pro-Serve, Inc., EPA Region IV, December 15,1975.
     (I.F.&R. No. IV-139-C, I.D. No. 114836.)

This was  a civil action  charging the respondent with violating the
Federal   Insecticide,  Fungicide  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E) and  136(c)(1). The action pertained to a-shipment made
on September 18, 1974, from  Memphis, Tennessee,  to  Lubbock,
Texas. The pesticide  involved  was  STAKILL  DIURON AND
BROMACIL  WEED   KILLER; «the charge was adulteration-
strength or purity fell below the professed standard of quality.

After discussion with the respondent and consideration of the facts
set forth,  the complaint was withdrawn.
1868. In Re: Cealin  Chemicals, EPA Region IV,  January  19,
     1976. (I.F.&R. No. IV-152C, I.D. No. 111022.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating  the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C
136jla)( 1 )(E);    136(q)(l KQ;    136(qK2)(Q(iv);    136(qK2)(Q(m);
136(q)(2)(C)(i) and 136{q)(2)(A). The action pertained to a  sale made
on May 2,  1975, to the City of Winter Park, Florida. The pesticide
involved was DUOCHLORIN; the charge was misbranding—labels
failed to bear required caution statements, requried  directions for
use, ingredient statement, assigned registration number, statement of
net weight  and name  and address of manufacturer and  the labels
bore a false safety claim.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent  Agreement. The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $980.00.
1869. In Re: Southern Mill Creek Products, Inc., EPA Region IV,
     February 6, 1976. (I.F.&R. No. IV-147-C, 1.9. Nos. 110668
     and 110872.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
                            1241

-------
136j(a)(l)(E)  and 136(q)(l)(F). The  action pertained to a shipment
made on May 29, 1975, from Miami, Florida, to Boca Chica, Florida,
and to a product held for distribution or sale on February 21,1975, at
Southern  Mill Creek Products, Inc., Tampa, Florida. The pesticide
involved was SMCP DURSBAN .5% GRANULAR INSECTICIDE;
the charge  was misbranding—labels  failed  to bear  adequate
directions for use.

The  respondent signed  a Consent  Agreement. The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,800.00.
1870. In Re: Paxton Processing Company, Inc., EPA Region V,
     November 5, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-014C, I.D. Nos. 94854
     and 94855.)

This was a civil action in which the respondent was charged with
violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C. 135a(a)(1);  136j(a)(1)(E); 136(q)(2)[A) and 136(q)(l)(G). The
action pertained to shipments made on May 11, 1973, from Paxton,
Illinois, to Doraville, Georgia. The pesticides involved were PEL-E-
CEL  and   SAN-I-CEL;  charges  included  nonregistration  and
misbranding—lack of adequate precautionary statements and lack
of ingredient statement on labels.

The respondent signed a  Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $300.00.
 1871. In Re: Beatrice Foods Co., EPA Region V, November 13,
      1975. (I.F.&R. No. V-307C, I.D. No. 108853.)

 This was a civil action in which the respondent  was charged with
 violating the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
 U.S.C.  136j(a)(l)(E);  136(q)(l)(G)  and 136(q)(l)(F). The  action
 pertained to a product held for distribution or sale on January 28,
 1975, at John Sexton & Co., Division of Beatrice Foods Co., Blue Ash,
 Ohio.  The   pesticide  involved   was  SEXTON  PINE   OIL
                             1242

-------
DISINFECTANT; the charge was misbranding—lack of adequate
caution statements and lack of directions for use on labels.

The respondent signed a  Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,680.00.
1872.  In  Re:  Federal Chemical Company, EPA Region VII,
     October 23,1974. (I.F.&R. No. VII-57C, I.D. No. 102673.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(G). The action pertained to a product held
for distribution or sale on  October 1, 1973, at Federal  Chemical
Company, Omaha, Nebraska. The  pesticide involved was GENERAL
GREEN CRABGRASS CONTROL; the charge was misbranding—
lack of adequate warning or caution statement.

The civil complaint was withdrawn after the respondent provided
evidence that the product  was  adequately labeled to protect man
and the environment.
1873. In Re: The Huge Company, EPA Region VII, October 25,
     1974. (I.F.&R. No. VII-54C, I.D. No. 91530.)

This was a civil action charging the  respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(G). The action pertained to a product held
for distribution or sale on August 15,  1973, at The Huge Company,
St. Louis, Missouri. The pesticide involved was EXCELCIDE SPECIAL
FLY SPRA; the charge was misbranding—label lacked adequate
warning  or caution statement and label lacked container disposal
statement.

The civil complaint was withdrawn after the respondent provided
evidence that the drum's labeling was in compliance  at the time of
labeling.
                            1243

-------
1874. In Re: Mallinckrodt Chemical Works, EPA Region VII,
     December 6,1974. (I.F. &R. No. VII-64C, I.D. No. 112707.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C.  136j
(a)(l)(E) and 136 (q)(l)(F). The action pertained to a product held for
distribution or sale on March 25, 1974, at Mallinckrodt  Chemical
Works,   St.   Louis,   Missouri.   The  pesticide   involved   was
MALLINCKRODT FORMALDEHYDE   SOLUTION  U.S.P.,  the
charge was misbranding—label lacked directions for use which were
necessary for  effecting the purpose for which  the product was-
intended and if complied with, adequate to protect health and the
environment.

The  respondent furnished sufficient  proof that  the product was
adequately labeled at the time of production. Therefore, the civil
complaint was withdrawn.
1875.  In  Re:  Veterinary Laboratories, Inc., EPA Region VII,
     January 31, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-66-C, I.D. No. 112508.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act, 7  U.S.C
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made on
May 21, 1974, from Lenexa, Kansas, to Kansas City, Missouri. The
pesticide involved was VET  LABS  FOUR-WAY SCREW-WORM
BOMB; the charge was nonregistration.

Respondent  put  forth sufficient  mitigating  factors  to  satisfy
complainant that, although it was reasonable to believe a violation
had  occurred,  the most equitable result it could pursue would be to
enter into a stipulation requesting respondent to recall the product.
                             1244

-------
1876. In Re: Farnam Companies, Incorporated, EPA Region VII,
     June 10,1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-90C, I.D. No. 112169.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating  the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E} and 136(q)(l)(G). The action pertained to a product held
for distribution or sale  on July  25,  1974, at Farnam Companies,
Incorporated, Omaha,   Nebraska.  The   pesticide  involved  was
FARNAM STABLE  SPRAY  EMULSIFIABLE  FLY  KILLER,  the
charge was misbranding-labels did not bear a signal word which is
necessary and if complied with, adequate to protect health and the
environment.

The complaint was withdrawn since the Registration Division stated
that  the signal word "Caution" was adequate for this product.


1877.  In Re: Patel, Incorporated,  Kansas  City, Missouri, EPA
     Region VII, August 20,1975. (I.F.&R. No. V11-121C, I.D. No.
     112338.)

This  was a civil action  charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C. 136
       ); 136e(c)(l)(AJ; 136e(c)(l)(B)and 136e(c)(l)(C).
The action pertained to the firms failure to submit a pesticides annual
report in a timely manner.

The civil complaint was  withdrawn since the firm was no longer in
business.
 1878.  In  Re:  Auto-Chlor System,  Inc., EPA  Region  VII,
     September 4,  1975.  (I.F.&R.  No.  VII-129C,  I.D.  No.
     114425.)

 This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
 Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act,  7  U.S.C.
 136j(a)(l)(E) and 136 (q)(l)(G). The action pertained to a product held
                             1245

-------
for distribution or sate on March 18, 1975, at Auto-Chlor System of
St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri. The pesticide involved was Auto-Chlor
Solution-CI;  the charge was  misbranding-lack of precautionary
statements on labels.

The  complaint  was  withdrawn, since the  respondent's answer
explained that  the alleged violations  occurred at the  place  of
business of a partnership doing business as Auto-Chlor System of St.
Louis rather than at AutoChlor System, Inc.
1879. In Re: Aute-Chlor System of St. Louis, EPA Region VII,
     November 7,1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-143C, I.D. No. 114425.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(G). The action pertained to a product held
for distribution or sale on March 18, 1975, at Auto-Chlor System of
St. Louis,  St. Louis, Missouri. The pesticide involved was AUTO-
CHLOR SOLUTION-CL; the  charge   was  misbranding-lack  of
precautionary statements on labels.

The  respondent  signed a Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $216.00.
1880. In Re: Panda-Victory Paints, EPA Region VII, November
     14,1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-144C, I.D. No. 114444.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made on
May 13, 1975, from St. Louis, Missouri, to East St. Louis, Illinois. The
pesticide  involved  was  SHURWAY  CREOSOTE  OIL PAINT
EXTERIOR WHITE; the charge was nonregistration.

The respondent  signed a Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,000.00.
                            1246

-------
1881. In Re: Harris Serum and Supply Company, Inc.,  EPA
     Region VII, November 19,1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-149C, I.D.
     No. 113064.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made  on
July  1,  1975, from McCook, Nebraska,  to  Dighton,  Kansas. The
pesticide  involved  was  TORDON  BEADS;  the  charge  was
nonregistration.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,320.00.
1882. In Re: Dymon, Inc., EPA Region VII, December 3, 1975.
     (I.F.&R. No. VII-140C, I.D. Nos. 112586 and 114310.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7 U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E);  136(q)(l)(G) and 135a(a)(l). The  action pertained to
shipments made on January 7, and April 24, 1974, from Shawnee
Mission, Kansas, to Kansas City, Kansas, and  St. Louis, Missouri. The
pesticides involved were LWK and COLE FLYING INSECT SPRAY;
charges   included  claims  differed  in  substance  from  the
representations  mode  in connection  with  its  registration  and
misbranding-lack of adequate warning or caution statements, lack of
statement of net contents and lack of assigned registration number on
labels.

The respondent signed a  Consent  Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $700.00.
                             1247

-------
1883. In Re: Jones Chemicals, Inc., EPA Region VII, December 3,
     1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-132C, I.D. No. 114426.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(aHl)(E); 136 (q)(l)(A) and  136(c)(l). The action pertained to a
product held for distribution or sale on March 30,1975, at Jones
Chemicals, Inc., Festus, Missouri. The pesticide involved was ISO
SUNNY SOL; charges included adulteration  and misbranding—
strength or purity fell below the professed standard  of  quality as
expressed on its labeling and labeling bore a  statement as to the
safety of the product which was false and misleading.

The  respondent  signed a Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $800.00.
1884.  In  Re:  Freesmeier  Laboratories, Inc., EPA Region VII,
     December 16,1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-155C, I.D. Nos. 114477
     and 114478.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to shipments made on
August 21, 1974, and April 9, 1975, from St. Louis, Missouri, to East
St.  Louis,  Illinois.  The  pesticide  involved was CLIG PINE OIL
DISINFECTANT; the charge was nonregistration.

The  respondent signed a  Consent  Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $594.00.
1885. In Re: Kemin Industries, Inc., EPA Region VII, December
     24, 1975. (I.F.&R. No. VII-95C, I.D. Nos. 107092, 107093
     and 112826.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to shipments made on
                             1248

-------
January 29, August 12, and August 21, 1974, from Oes Moines,
Iowa, to Columbia, Tennessee. The pesticides involved were HAY
SAVOR and SILAGE SAVOR;; the charge was nonregistration.

The  respondent signed a  Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $3,000.00.
1886. In Re: Kemin Industries, Inc., EPA Region VII, December
    24,1975. (I.F.&R. No. Vll-l 16C, I.D. No. 112332.)

This was a  civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C.
136](a)(2)(L); 136e(c)(l)(A}; 136e(c)(l)(B) and 136e(c)(l)(Q. The action
pertained to the firm's failure to submit a pesticides annual report in a
timely manner.

The respondent signed a  Consent  Agreement.  The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $1,000.00.
1887. In Re: Omaha Compound Company, EPA Region  VII,
     January 6, 1976. (I.F.&R. No. VII-157C, I.D. Nos. 102411,
     102412,102413 and 102414.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Rodenticide  Act,  7 U.S.C.
136j(a}(l)(A) and 136a(a). The action pertained to products held for
distribution or  sale on October 16, 1975, at Omaha  Compound
Company,  Omaha,  Nebraska.   The  pesticides  involved  were
ANTISECT 68, DEFIANCE PINE OIL DISINFECTANT, HY GEE NITE
GERMICIDE and INSTANT  BOWL  CLEANER; the charge  was
nonregistration.

The respondent  signed a  Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,900.00.
                           1249

-------
 1888. In Re: W.R. Sweeney Manufacturer, Inc., EPA Region VII,
     January 6,1976. (I.F.&R. No. VII-152C, I.D. No. 114436.)

 This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating  the
 Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C.
 136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)(l)(A). The action pertained to a product held
 for distribution  or sale on February 28, 1975,  at W.R. Sweeney
 Manufacturer, Inc.,  Salibury, Missouri. The pesticide involved was
 SWEENEY'S  NEW IMPROVED POISON WHEAT; the  charge was
 misbranding-product was not effective in killing mice when used as
 directed in labeling.

 The  respondent signed a Consent  Agreement.  The Final Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $654.00.
1889. In Re: Warren Douglas Chemical Co., EPA Region VII,
     January 6,1976. (I.F.&R. No. VII- 150C, I.D. No. 114389.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E);  136(q)(l)(A) and 136(c)(l). The action pertained  to a
product held  for distribution or sale on July 22, 1975, at Warren
Douglas  Chemical Co., Inc., Omaha, Nebraska.  The  pesticide
involved  was WARLASCO  EMULSION  TOILET  BOWL AND
URINAL   CLEANER;  charges   included    adulteration   and
misbranding—strength or purity fell below the professed standard of
quality as expressed on its labeling.

The  respondent  signed a  Consent  Agreement. The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,400.00.
1890.  In  Re: James  Varley & Sons, Inc.,  EPA Region  VII,
     January 7,1976. (I.F.&R. No. VII-153C, I.D. No. 118776.)

This  was a civil action  charging the  respondent with violating  the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made on
                            1250

-------
July 21, 1975, from St. Louis, Missouri, to East Rochester, New York.
The pesticide involved was GABRIEL PERK SHAMPOO; the charge
was nonregistration.

The respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement. The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $ 1,000.00.
1891. In Re: Lift Products, Inc., EPA Region VII, January 9,1976.
     (I.F.&R. No. VIM38C, I.D. Nos. 114291 and 114292.)

This  was a civil action  charging the respondent with violating  the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7 U.S.C
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made on
March 26, 1975, from Cedar Rapids, Iowa, to Rock Island, Illinois.
The pesticides involved  were BOWLITE and HEAVY-DUTY STERI-
KLEEN; the charge was nonregistration.

The  respondent signed a Consent Agreement. The  Final  Order
assessed a civil penalty of $324.00.
1892.  In  Re: Plaze, Inc., EPA Region VII, January 9, 1976.
     (I.F.&R. No. VIM51C, I.D. No. 113012.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent  with violating the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide, and Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E) and 136(q)U)(G). The action pertained to a product held
for distribution or sale on June 3,  1975, at  Plaze, Inc., St. Louis,
Missouri. The pesticide involved was VARLEY #400 INSECTICIDE;
the charge was misbranding —lack of warning or caution statement
and lack of ingredient statement on labels.

The complaint was withdrawn after  the  respondent  provided
evidence that the misbranded product was not being held for sale at
the time of sampling.
                            1251

-------
 1893. In Re: Wichita Brush & Chemical Co., Inc., EPA Region VII,
     January 12,1976. (I.F.&R. No. VII-156C, I.D. No. 114631.)

 This was a  civil action charging the respondent with violating  the
 Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
 136j(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(l)(A) and 136(c)(l). The  action pertained to a
 product held for Distribution or  sale on May 13,  1975, at Wichita
 Brush &  Chemical Company, Inc.,  Wichita,  Kansas. The pesticide
 involved was GAMMA-MENE 1; charges included adulteration and
 misbranding—strength or purity fell below the professed standard of
 quality as expressed on its labeling.

 The  respondent signed a  Consent Agreement.  The Final  Order
 assessed a civil penalty of $1,560.00.
1894. In Re: Precision Products Company, North Kansas City,
     Missouri, EPA Region VII, January 15, 1976. (I.F.&R. VII-
     Il7c, I.D. No. 112334.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide  Act,  7  U.S.C.
136e(c)(l)(A); 136e(c)(l)(B)and 136j(a)(2)(L); 136e(c)(l)(C). The action
pertained to the firm's failure to submit a pesticides annual report in a
timely manner. The complaint was withdrawn since the respondent's
business was destroyed by fire on August 6, 1974, and its  pesticides
business has never resumed.
1895.  In  Re: Research Products Company, EPA  Region  VII,
     January T5,1976. (I.F.&R. No. VII-82C, I.D. No. 102615.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with  violating  the
Federal Insecticide,  Fungicide, and  Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C.
135a(a)(l). The action pertained to a shipment made on June 6,
1973,  from Salina, Kansas, to Lincoln, Nebraska. The pesticide
involved was DETIA GAS-EX-B;  the  charge was that the claims
made for the product differed in substance from the representations
made in connection with its registration.
                            1252

-------
The  complaint  was  withdrawn  after the  respondent  provided
evidence of governmental correspondence indicating that the correct
label had been used.
1896. In Re: Earl May Seed and Nursery Company, EPA Region
     VII, January 23,  1976. (I.F.&R. No.  VII-I62C, I.D. No.
     114386.)

This  was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide, Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act,  7  U.S.C.
136j(a)(l)(E); 135a(a)(l); and 136(q)(l)(G). The action pertained to a
shipment made on Ma/ 29,  1975, from Shenondoah, Iowa,  to
Lincoln,  Nebraska. The pesticide involved was EARL MAY 57%
MALATHION SPRAY; charges included directions for use differed
in substance from the  representations made in connection with  its
registration and misbranding—lack of adequate warning or caution
statement on labels.

The  respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement.  The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $2,400.00.
1897. In Re: Levenson Chemical Company, EPA Region VII,
     January 27, 1976. (I.F.&R. No. VII-146C, I.D. NOB. 114337
     and 114338.)

This  was a civil action charging the  respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act,  7 U.S.C.
136i(a)(l)(E); 136(q)(l)(G) and 136 (q)(l)(E). The action pertained to a
product  held for distribution or sale on January 7, 1975, at Levenson
Chemical Company, Omaha, Nebraska. The pesticides involved were
OKAY RAT KILL and OKAY MICE KILL CONTAINS PROLIN; the
charge was misbranding—product only partially effective when used
as directed, lack of warning or caution statement, lack of adequate
ingredient statement  and lack of assigned registration number  on
labels.
                            1253

-------
The  respondent  signed  a Consent Agreement. The Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $864.00.
1898. In Re: Land and Sky, EPA Region VII, January 28,1976.
     (I.F.&R. No. VII-161C, I.D. No. 102373.)

This was a civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal  Insecticide,  Fungicide,  and  Rodenticide Act, 7  U.S.C
135a(a)(l) and 135b. The action pertained to a shipment made on or
about September 18, 1975, from Lincoln, Nebraska, to Kansas City,
Missouri. The pesticide involved was CLEARWATER WATERBED
ALGAE CONTROL; the charge was nonregistration.

The  respondent  signed a Consent  Agreement.  The  Final Order
assessed a civil penalty of $297.00.
1899. U.S. v. 2700 units, more or less, of products labeled in
     part "BUGMASTER MODEL "G", BUGMASTER SHELF-N-
     DRAWER PAPER, BUGMASTER MOSQUITO COIL,  and
     ME-HI." U.S. District Court, Western District of Missouri,
     December  19,  1974. (CIVIL No.  74 CV 548S,  I.D.  No.
     74976.)

This  was  a seizure action  charging the products  with  being in
violation of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7
U.S.C.  136k(b)(l)(B) and 136k(c). The action pertained to products
held  for distribution or sale on September 12, 1974, at  Southern
National  Manufacturing Co., Hollister, Missouri. The charge  was
nonregistration.

The Default Decree of Condemnation ordered destruction  of the
seized  products.  The material was  destroyed  by burying  at the
Springfield, Missouri, city dump.
                            1254

-------
1900. In Re: Clark Lumber Company, EPA Region X, December
     1,1975. (I.F.&R. No. X-29C.)

This was o civil action charging the respondent with violating the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act, 7 U.S.C. 136f(b).
The action pertained to a product held for distribution or sale on April
22,1975, at Clark Lumber Company, Tualatin, Oregon. The pesticide
involved was BENITE, A WOOD PER5ERVATIVE; the charge was
failure to furnish or permit access to records.

The action was terminated by Consent Agreement and Final Order
which assessed a civil penalty of $420 and contained an agreement
by Respondent to allow access to records.
                            1255

-------
           Index  to Notices of Judgment 1851-1900

                                                    NJ. No.

Aquashade (Civil)                                          1859
Arcal Chemicals,  Inc. (Civil)                                1864
Auto-Chlor System,  Inc.  (Civil)                              1878
Auto-Chlor System of St. Louis (Civil)                       1879
Beatrice  Foods Co. (Civil)                                  1871
Bixon Chemical Co.  (Civil)                                  1862
Bixon Chemical Co.  (Civil)                                  1863
Bowman, Mell and  Co.,  Inc.  (Civil)                         1865
Bugmaster Model "G" (Seizure)                             1899
Bugmaster Mosquito Coil (Seizure)                           1899
Bugmaster Shelf-N-Drawer Paper (Seizure)                   1899
Cealin Chemicals  (Civil)                                     1868
Clark Lumber  Company  (Civil)                               1900
Dore-lnternational,  Inc. (Civil)                               1857
Dymon,  Inc.  (Civil)                                        1882
Earl  May Seed & Nursery Company (Civil)                  1896
Eastern  Laboratories, Inc. (Civil)                             1855
Ernesto  S. Barbosa (Civil)                                  1854
Farnam  Companies,  Incorporated  (Civil)                     1876
Federal  Chemical  Company (Civil)                           1872
Freesmeier Laboratories,  Inc.  (Civil)                          1884
Harris Serum and  Supply Company,  Inc. (Civil)              1881
Hollowick, Inc. (Civil)                                      1853
Huge Company, The (Civil)                                 1873
James Varley  & Sons, Inc. (Civil)                           1890
Jones Chemicals,  Inc. (Civil)                                1883
Kare Chemical Company  (Civil)                             1866
Kemin Industries,  Inc. (Civil)                                1885
Kemin Industries,  Inc. (Civil)                                1886
Land  and Sky (Civil)                                       1898
Levenson  Chemical Company (Civil)                          1897
Lift Products,  Inc.  (Civil)                                    1891
Mallinckrodt Chemical Works  (Civil)                          1874
Me-Hi (Seizure)                                            1899
Omaha  Compound  Company (Civil)                          1887
Panda-Victory  Paints (Civil)                                 1880
Patel,  Incorporated (Civil)                                  1877
                              1256

-------
Paxton  Processing Company,  Inc. (Civil)                     1870
Plaze,  Inc.  (Civil)                                          1892
Precision Products Company (Civil)                           1894
Pro-Serve,  Inc. (Civil)                                       1867
Research Products Company (Civil)                           1895
Rover Pet Products (Civil)                                   1856
Southern Mill Creek Products, Inc. (Civil)                    1869
Tenneco Chemicals,  Inc. (Civil)                              1860
Trio  Chemical Works,  Inc. (Civil)                            1851
Trio  Chemical WOrks,  Inc. (Civil)                           1852
Utility Chemical Co. (Civil)                                  1861
Veterinary  Laboratories, Inc.  (Civil)                          1875
W.R. Sweeney Manufacturer,  Inc.  (Civil)                    1888
Warren  Douglas  Chemical Co. (Civil)                        1889
Wichita Brush & Chemical Co.,  Inc. (Civil)                  1893
Zoe  Chemical Co.,  Inc. (Civil)                              1858
                                1257

-------