EPA-660/2-73-022
December 1973
                        Environmental Protection Technology Series
     Tertiary Treatment
     with a  Controlled
     Ecological System
                                  Office of Research and Development
                                  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                  Washington, D.C. 20460

-------
             RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of  the  Office  of  Research  and
Monitoring,  Environmental Protection  Agency, have
been  grouped into five  series.  These   five  broad
categories  were established to facilitate further
development  and  application   of   environmental
technology.   Elimination  of traditional grouping
was   consciously  planned  to  foster    technology
transfer   and  a  maximum  interface   in  related
fields.   The five series are:

   1.  Environmental Health Effects Research
   2.  Environmental Protection Technology
   3.  Ecological Research
   U.  Environmental Monitoring
   5.  Socioeconomic Environmental Studies

This  report has been assigned to the ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION   TECHNOLOGY   series.    This   series
describes   research    performed  to   develop  and
demonstrate   instrumentation,    equipment    and
methodology  to  repair  or  prevent environmental
degradation from point  and  non-point   sources  of
pollution.  This work provides the new or improved
technology  required for the control and  treatment
of pollution sources to meet environmental quality
standards.

                  EPA REVIEW NOTICE

This report has been reviewed by the Office of Research and
Development, EPA,  and approved for publication. Approval does
not signify that the contents necessarily reflect  the views
and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
For late by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 90 cents

-------
                                         EPA-660/2-73-022
                                         December 1973
             TERTIARY  TREATMENT

  WITH A CONTROLLED ECOLOGICAL SYSTEM
                      by
      Las Vlrgenes Municipal Water District
             4232 Las Virgenes Road
           Calabasas, California 91302
               Project 16080 FBH
            Program Element 1BB045
                 Project Officer
           Dr. Kenneth E. Biesinger
       National Water Quality Laboratory
            Duluth,  Minnesota  55804
                  Prepared for

   OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND MONITORING

U. S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

         WASHINGTON, D. C.  20460

-------
                           ABSTRACT
A two-stage pond system was constructed and operated as a process
for polishing secondary sewage effluent.  In the shallow first pond a
luxuriant growth of algae was maintained.  In the second stage a popu-
lation of Daphnia pulex_effectively removed the algae.  Total volume
of the system was 1, 135 cubic meters.  A program of chemical and
biological monitoring was followed over a twelve-month period.  Ob-
jectives were to demonstrate feasibility of the process for producing
recreational-grade water,  acquire operating data on a completely
biological process, and determine  its potential for nutrient removal.
The system was operated with about  10 days' detention in each stage.

The Daphnia remained as the dominant zooplankton species in the sec-
ond stage pond throughout the observation period, and during periods
when their concentration was above 500-organisms/liter, were able to
hold water transparence at Secchi disk readings  around 2 meters.   At
such times COD reduction was above 40 percent across  the system.
Significant removal of nutrients occurred only during the months of
July and August when nitrogen and  phosphate reductions were 48 per-
cent and 63 percent, respectively.  Nutrient removal performance was
hampered by occasional  invasions of  Daphnia or  rotifers in the first
stage pond, which decimated the algae population; such events were
not successfully controlled and remain the principal obstacle to further
development of the process.

This report was submitted in fulfillment of Project Number  16080 FBH
by the Las Virgenes Municipal Water District under the (partial) spon-
sorship of the Environmental Protection Agency.  Work was completed
as of December 1971.

-------
                       TABLE OF CONTENTS


Section                                                      Page

              Abstract                                         ii.

              List of Figures                                   iv

              List of Tables                                    vi

              Acknowledgments                                 vii

I             Conclusions                                      1

EL             Recommendations                                 2

III            Introduction                                      3

IV            Plant Description                                 5

V             Procedures
                   Operation                                    9
                   Daphnia Separation                          10
                   Analytical Work                             11

VI            Results
                   General Performance                        15
                   Nutrient Removal                            17
                   Biological Conditions                        23

VII           Design Implications                              26

VIII           References                                      28

-------
                             FIGURES
                                                            Page
 1            System Flow Diagram                            6




 2            Pond Construction Details                         8




 3            Daphnia Separation Apparatus                   12




 4            Photograph of Pond 1                           14




 5            Photograph of Pond 2                           14




 6            Distribution of Phosphate Tracer                22




 7            Average Temperature                          29




 8            Hydraulic Turn- Over Rate                       30




 9            Liquid Clarity                                  31




10            Suspended Solids                                32




1 1            Chemical Oxygen Demand,  Unfiltered            33




12            Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen                         34




13            Ammonia Nitrogen                              35




14            Nitrate Nitrogen                                36




15            Total Phosphate,  Unfiltered                     37




16            Total Phosphate,  Filtered                       38




17            Chlorella                                       39




18            Daphnia and Color - Pond 2                      40
                                iv

-------
                        FIGURES (Continued)







No.                                                           PaSe




19            pH                                              41




20            Total Alkalinity                                  42




21            Calcium                                         43

-------
                             TABLES







No.                                                        Page




 1            Process Determinations                         13




 2            Summary Data                                  16




 3            Total Organic Carbon Determinations             17




 4            Monthly Average Nutrient Concentrations         18




 5            Nitrogen Balance                                20




 6            Phosphate Balance                              21
                              VI

-------
                      ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
A Board of consultants consisting of Dr.  Charles R.  Hazel,  Dr. John
Klock, Dr. James L.  Morgan, and Dr. George O. Schumann met three
times during the project and provided valuable advice and assistance.
Mr.  Lloyd D. Hedenland, Sanitation Superintendent of the Las Virgenes
Municipal Water District,  acted as project field manager.  Dr. Andrew
L. Gram of Gram/Phillips Associates provided general direction, de-
signed the pond system, and compiled the final report.

The  organic carbon analyses were performed courtesy of the research
and development laboratory of the Los Angeles County Sanitation Dis-
tricts.
                                 vn

-------
                            SECTION I

                          CONCLUSIONS
A two-stage pond process based on growth of algal cells and their
subsequent ingestion by Daphnia can achieve effluent clarity together
with substantial reductions  in organic matter, nitrogen, and phosphate
provided that active populations of both organisms are maintained.

In such a process,  phosphate removal occurs mainly by precipita-
tion at the elevated pH of the first-stage pond, while nitrogen  is con-
verted to solid organic forms by the algae and Daphnia and removed by
sedimentation in the  second-stage pond.  Effective removal of both
nitrogen and phosphorus occurs only during the warm-weather months.

Daphnia concentrations on the order of several hundred organisms per
liter are easily capable of filtering virtually all algae from a pond of
several days'  detention.

The principal obstacle to reliable nutrient removal performance is the
problem of preventing blooms of algal predators which occur  in the
first-stage pond.

-------
                            SECTION II

                       RECOMMENDATIONS
The process studied herein is chiefly applicable to the polishing of
effluent from small secondary treatment plants.  Where high nutrient
removal efficiencies are necessary, or where land is costly or un-
available, other methods must be used.  In order to put the algae-
Daphnia process  into the plant designer's practical repertoire, there
should be further investigation to develop design data.   The principal
questions relate to biological criteria;  performance is closely asso-
ciated with maximizing algae production and maintaining a vigorous
Daphnia population.  Increased reliability can only come through pro-
cess modifications which successfully accommodate the various phy-
siological requirements of these organisms.  The next logical step
would be to  correlate the growth and feeding behavior of Daphnia with
the composition of the treated waste water in which they are to per-
form.

On the basis of one year's  operation of a particular pond configuration,
the following tentative design guidelines are suggested for  use in sub-
tropical climates (pond temperature 10°C to 25°C seasonal range):

      1.   First-stage pond:            Depth,  60 to 90 cm
                                       Detention,  6 to 8 days

      2.   Second-stage pond:           Depth,  2. 5 meters minimum
                                       Detention,  5 days

      3.   Provide overflow connection from first pond to second,  and
make horizontal distance between the two stages as great as practical.

      4.   Provide for dewatering and cleaning  of ^second pond on an
annual or more frequent schedule.

      5.   Divide first-stage pond into  several compartments, with
capability of operating  either in series or in parallel.

-------
                           SECTION in

                         INTRODUCTION
The Controlled Ecology demonstration project was based on a phenome-
non observed in the system of effluent irrigation ponds at the Tapia
Plant of Las Virgenes Municipal Water District.  There, water which
had acquired a heavy growth of-algae during short storage in the initial
pond was clarified in the downstream storage pond through the preda-
tory action of a persistent Daphnia population.  Five sets of analyses
made between July and October, 1968,  showed considerable reductions
of phosphate and nitrate.  In the demonstration project a similar sys-
tem of smaller ponds was constructed and operated independently of
the sewage treatment plant.  Objectives were (a) to demonstrate tech-
nical  and economic feasibility of producing recreational-grade water
from  secondary sewage effluent by means of a two-stage algae-crusta-
cean process; (b) acquire operating data which could be used in formu-
lating design criteria and interpreting water quality phenomena in
artificial lakes; and (c) to determine the process's potential for re-
moving nitrogen and phosphorus.

The basic processes  involved consist of (1) the photosynthetic growth
of green algae on inorganic carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus present
in the sewage effluent, and (Z) the consumption of the algae  by Daphnia.
The two processes are carried out consecutively in separate ponds so
that the production of algae can be maximized.  There are several im-
portant side effects.  Oxygen is produced in the first pond as a  by-
product of photosynthesis, and is consumed in the second by respira-
tion of the Daphnia and other organisms.  During rapid algae growth,
bicarbonate is depleted,  resulting in a  rise in pH,  which in  turn pro-
motes the removal of phosphate by precipitation, presumably as cal-
cium,  phosphate.  Finally,  there is an accumulation of organic sedi-
ments on the bottoms of both ponds, made possible by several days'
detention in each under quiescent conditions.

One promising feature of the system is the extent of clarification
attainable.  Removal of the algae by Daphnia is very effective,  and
costs are negligible in contrast to any other means of algae separation
which has yet been studied.  It  is also possible to go one step further

-------
in the food chain and use fish to remove the Daphnia or regulate
population.  However a comparison of food intake versus growth of
both fish and Daphnia shows  that the removal of nitrogen and phos-
phorus nutrients from the sewage effluent by incorporation in the body
tissues of these organisms would be negligible.  For example, Richman
measured enthalpy conversions  in a system of Daphnia pulex feeding on
the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardi. He found that only 4 to 13
percent of the algal heat content reappears in the cell tissue of young
Daphnia, and with adult organisms the conversion is  less than 1. 5 per-
cent. Since algae and Daphnia have similar nitrogen and phosphorus
compositions, as well as roughly the same heat value, the Daphnia
could retain no more than about 10 percent of the N and P content of
their algal diet.  The same situation prevails during  the transformation
of Daphnia into fish tissue.   Bennett^ has summarized food conversion
data for several warm water fish; the weight ratio of food fish produced
to food consumed is generally less than 0.4, even when the fish are
actively growing.  Any substantial nutrient removal must therefore be
due to other mechanisms,  such  as  conversion to a solid form capable
of sedimentation.

-------
                           SECTION IV

                       PLANT DESCRIPTION
The project was located on the grounds  of the District's Tapia Treat-
ment Plant.  The site is in Malibu Canyon about 6 kilometers inland
from the Pacific Ocean.  Terrain is rather  steep and rugged, and the
project ponds were constructed on small level areas which were fortui-
tously available.  The climate is temperate and relatively mild,  but
the site is  somewhat insulated from the ocean's influence by mountains.
Daily air temperatures range from over 32 °C on hot summer days to
below freezing on winter nights.

Scale of the project units was chosen on the basis  of simulating natural
environmental conditions at the lowest possible cost.  Initially it was
not known to what extent the success of the Daphnia population might
depend on such things as illumination, available water  depth, nature
of pond bottom, etc.  A relatively deep earth basin was therefore pro-
vided, with a ratio of surface to volume approximating that of the res-
ervoir in which the Daphnia had been observed to thrive.  Similarly,
the algae pond was made large  enough that sunlight illumination level
and other growth-determining factors would be comparable to those
prevailing  in a full-scale plant.

A  schematic diagram of the system is shown in Figure 1.  The feed
was activated sludge effluent taken from the Tapia Plant's spray irri-
gation system.  Flow rates were adjusted manually and were totalized
on 5-cm water meters at three points in the system.   Part of the
algae pond effluent could be diverted around the second pond to permit
independent selection of detention periods.

Both ponds were circular in plan.   Pond 1 was designed along the lines
of a conventional oxidation pond.  Gunite lining was provided to permit
occasional thorough cleaning and to avoid entrainment of sediment.
Water depth was 1. 4m and its  volume about 900 cu m.  Pond 2 was
left unlined so that natural vegetation could develop, and its  3-meter
depth provided a range of illumination levels.  Two tiers of benches
were left in the side  slopes to accommodate sediment sample collectors.
The  volume of Pond 2 was 340 cu m.

-------
                                    FIGURE
   SYSTEM   FLOW  DIAGRAM
TO UPPER
STORAGE RESERVOIR
FROM LOWER
STORAGE RERVOIR
                   EFFUJENT
                    RETURN

-------
 Inlets to both ponds consisted of a submerged 5-cm steel pipe dis-
.charging at one point near the periphery.  In Pond 1 the inlet was 30
 cm from the bottom and pointed in a circumferential direction.  In
 Pond 2 the inlet pipe was 30 cm below the surface and pointed toward
 the center.  The outlets of both ponds were concrete weir boxes located
 diametrically opposite the inlets.  Figure 2 shows the general construc-
 tion features.

 When Pond 2 was first filled with water  the leakage rate was about
 1. 3 liters  per second. It gradually decreased over a period of several
 weeks to about 0.6 I/sec.  In order to further  reduce the loss rate a
 ton of bentonite was slurried into the pond and allowed  to settle.  Leak-
 age thereafter remained at about 0. 3 I/sec.

-------
                               POND CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
                      5cm INLET
00
                          POND  I
                                                                5cm INLET
                                                                            BENCHES
OUTLET
WEIR BOX
                                       Scm.GUNITE LINING
                                            1.5m
                                                                                OUTLET
                                                                                WEIR BOX
                                                                  POND 2
                                                                             WOOD PLANKS
                                 3.3 m
                                                                 SECTION B-B
                                          0.3 m
                           SECTION  A-A

-------
                           SECTION V

                          PROCEDURE?
OPERATION

The liquid feed to the pond system consisted of activated sludge effluent
of good quality.   The District's sewage is almost entirely domestic and
it arrives at the plant in fairly fresh condition.  During the period of
pond operation most of the plant's  effluent flow was being disposed of
by hillside spray irrigation.   For this purpose the plant effluent was
chlorinated and discharged to a storage pond of about two days' capa-
city.  From there it was pumped to the spray  system. A lateral con-
nection to the spray system was the source of influent for the experi-
mental ponds.  At the upper  end of the spray system is a second storage
reservoir, which under normal operating conditions has  a detention
time of several days.   It was in this upper reservoir that the persistent
clarifying effect of Daphnia was observed to occur naturally.

At commencement of operations with the experimental system in August,
1970, Pond 1 was filled with water pumped from the lower storage re-
servoir in the normal manner.  Pond 2 was  filled from the upper stor-
age reservoir to  assure the presence of some Daphnia as seed.  Within
one week a dense bloom of algae,  mostly Chlorella, had formed in both
ponds.  After one month of operation Daphnia  appeared at high concen-
tration, first in Pond  1 and a few days later in Pond 2.

The algae were decimated in both ponds.  In Pond 2 the Daphnia were
sustained temporarily by feeding water from the upper storage reser-
voir,  which at that time had a fairly high algae count.  In Pond 1 the
Daphnia died out  in several days;  feeding with  the normal influent
was resumed, and a relatively stable algae population returned.  From
this point on,  the system operated generally as intended with algae
growth in Pond 1  and subsequent clarification  in Pond 2.

Flow  rates were initially set at 1. 9 I/sec through both ponds.   Begin-
ning in January,  1971, when analyses were being made on a regular
schedule, the flow through the system was reduced to 1.3 I/sec. De-
tention times were then approximately 8. 3 days and 3. 1 days in Ponds 1

-------
 and 2 respectively.  In June the flow through Pond 1 was dropped to
 0. 9 I/sec to encourage more complete nutrient removals.  The Pond 2
 flow was also lowered at the same time for a different reason.  The
 Daphnia population began to falter,  and the flow was cut to about 0. 4
 I/sec to avoid losing them altogether. In September,  1971,  the Pond  1
 feed was brought back up to 1.9 I/sec as a measure to control Daphnia
 plagues.

 A continuous temperature record was obtained of the liquid in both
 ponds, and of the air in the vicinity of Pond 1.  Wooden shelters at
 each site housed spring-wound 7-day recorders.   Temperature probes
 were suspended at mid-depth.

 Collection of samples from Pond 1 for chemical and biological analysis
 was carried out by casting a tethered bottle from three points on the
 pond periphery and pooling the contents.  In Pond 2 the Daphnia popu-
 lation tended to concentrate somewhat in different regions,  so a series
 of five samples  was taken along a pond diameter.  An  aluminum boat
 was used as a platform, and it was maneuvered by pulling along a fixed
 cable suspended above the pond surface.  Vertical "core" samples were
 taken by lowering a length of 2-cm PVC pipe through the liquid depth,
 stoppering the upper  end, and  removing carefully.

 Sediment samplers were placed on the earth benches which had been
 provided for them in  Pond 2.   These consisted of shallow open-top
 wooden boxes, one foot square,  partially filled with earth in simula-
 tion of the natural bottom.  Sets of the samplers were  removed at in-
 tervals during the study,  and portions of the accumulated sediment
 were analyzed for organic nitrogen and total phosphate.  The earth
 bedding tended to interfere with subsequent selection of a representa-
 tive aliquot of bottom area, and it was difficult to avoid washing of the
 open samplers when hoisting them to the surface.  In May, 1971, a
 different type  of sediment collector was installed and proved to be
more suitable.  They were short lengths of 5-cm PVC  pipe, capped
at the bottom and attached to a  steel stake which would hold them on
the  pond bottom  in a vertical position.

DAPHNIA SEPARATION

 There were periods of operation in which the Daphnia population in
Pond 2 increased to a level much greater than  was  necessary to


                                10

-------
 consume all of the algae being delivered.  Also,  as described subse-
 quently,  there were several instances of Daphnia becoming established
 in Pond 1 where their presence was undesired.  In both situations it
 would have been of some benefit to have available a means of removing
 Daphnia without  interfering with the liquid flow.  A device to accom-
 plish this was designed, constructed, and operated successfully,
 although  it was never  used as a regular process component.  Figure 3
 shows the general features of the apparatus.  Water from Pond 2 was
 pumped over a 60° sheet metal cone onto a funnel-shaped nylon screen
 having 80 filaments per sq cm.  Most of the water passed through the
 screen and flowed back into the pond.  Daphnia accumulated on the
 screen and sloughed gradually with a  small  flow of water  to the center
 of the funnel.  The central 23 cm of the screen could  easily handle
 6 I/sec of feed, concentrating  an initial Daphnia concentration of sev-
 eral hundred per liter 20 fold.   Passage through the pump mutilated
 most of the organisms.  If there should be any reason to preserve them
 alive, it would be necessary to use gravity flow or some other rela-
 tively non-violent means of transport.

 ANALY TICAL WORK

 The group of analytical determinations carried out on a regular basis
 was selected partly to demonstrate process  performance,  but also to
 provide information on process mechanisms.  Table I gives a schedule
 of the various measurements.   "Daily" analyses were normally per-
 formed every day except weekends and holidays.  In addition to the
 regular determinations", organic carbon in the influent and two  ponds
 was estimated several times with a Beckman analyzer. Also,  Kjeldahl
 nitrogen and total phosphate were run on bottom samples  taken from
 the ponds.

Analytical techniques were in accordance with Standard Methods wher-
 ever applicable.   Transparence in Pond 2  was measured by lowering
 a 20-cm Secchi disk to the depth of disappearance.  Turbidity was ex-
 pressed as percent transmittance of white light through a  one-cm
 sample thickness.  All colorimetric determinations were  read on a
 Lumetron colorimeter.  Suspended solids  were measured by  filtering
a 25-ml sample through a tared 0. 45-micron Millipore disk,  drying
 at 103° C, and weighing.  The  EDTA tltration  method was used for
 calcium,  brucine method for nitrate,  direct nesslerization for ammo-
 nia, and Kjeldahl nitrogens were read colorimetrically after  distillation.
                               11

-------
                                             FIGURE  3
          DAPHN1A    SEPARATION
                  APPARATUS
DETAIL 'A1
                 60 cm
                          -INFLUENT FROM POND 2
DIAM.
                           DISTRIBUTION
                           CONE
              ,80/sq cm
              NYLON SCREEN
                28 cm
                   CLEAR
                _». WATER
                   RETURN
            SINK DRAIN
            FITTING
CONCENTRATED
DAPHNIA SLURRY
          SEWN SEAM

                 NYLON SCREEN
           STEEL RING 0.6cm  0 ROD

       DETAIL 'A1
                         12

-------
"Filtered" determinations were made on the filtrate generated during
the suspended solids procedure-.

Algae counts and identification were carried out under a microscope
at 400X magnification using a haemacytometer cell.  Daphnia concen-
trations were determined by manually removing the  specimens found
in a 100-ml aliquot of sample using an eye dropper.
               Table 1.  PROCESS DETERMINATIONS
      Measurement
Physical
      Flow
      Temperature
      Transparence
      Suspended Solids
      Turbidity
      Color
Location
I,  1. 2
Air, 1, 2
2
I,  1, 2
I,  1, 2
2
Frequency
Daily
Continuous
Daily
Daily
Daily
Daily
Chemical
      pH
      Alkalinity
      COD, filtered and unfiltered
      Calcium
      Kjeldahl nitrogen, filtered
       and unfiltered
      Ammonia nitrogen
      Nitrate nitrogen
      Orthophosphate,  filtered
       and unfiltered
      Dissolved oxygen
Biological
      Algae count and species
      Daphnia count
I,  1,  2
I,  1,  2
I,  1,  2
I.  1,  2

I,  1,  2
I,  1,  2
I,  1,  2

I,  1,  2
1, 2
 1
 1, 2
2/day
2/day
1 /week
1 /week

1 /week
1 /week
I/week

1 /week
2/day
Daily
Daily
                                 13

-------

Figure 4.  Pond 1

Figure 5.  Pond 2
      14

-------
                           SECTION VI

                            RESULTS
GENERAL PERFORMANCE

Figures 7 through 21 provide a chronological record of system condi-
tions over a 14-month period.  On most of the charts parallel records
are given for influent, Pond  1, and Pond 2.  The bar-type plots show
the times and spacing of samples, as well as the pattern of change.
Table 2 contains the average results by months of several performance
parameters.

The seasonal temperature progression in the two ponds  is shown on
Figure 7.  Values ranged from a low.of about 5 ° C in early January to
28° in early August.  Daily fluctuations are not shown on the chart,  but
the peak-to-peak span was about 5° in Pond 1 and about  1.5° in Pond 2
(during clear weather).  Flow data are represented on Figure 8 in the
form of a smoothed hydraulic throughput rate.  Plotted values are the
reciprocal of the mean residence time  of the current pond contents.
The computation was made under the assumptions of complete mixing
and of steady delivery of flow between daily readings; the residence
time at the end of a given day is given by the formula Tn = V/Qn +
(Tn_i - V/Qn)exp(-Qn/V) where V is pond volume and Qn the volume
of influent during day "n". The spikes in the Pond 1 graph represent
flushing events •which were instituted to suppress  incursions of Daphnia
and rotifers, as discussed later.

Transparence and clarity of  the Pond 2 effluent are shown on Figure 9.
Secchi disk readings were from 2.0 to  2.5 m all through the spring
months.  The decline during  the subsequent summer corresponds
exactly to a reduction in the  Daphnia population.   Comparison of influent
and effluent light transmittance in the spring suggests a reduction in
colloidal matter of about 50 percent (log 0. 93 versus log 0. 86).   During
the summer Pond 2 was slightly more turbid than the influent because
of incomplete algae removal.  Turbidity in Pond 1 was not measured;
at most times it was far greater  than that of the influent because of its
algae content.  The suspended solids record, Figure 10, illustrates
the growth of algal cells in Pond 1 and  their  subsequent  removal in

                                15

-------
                   Table 2.  SUMMARY DATA
                     Trans-    Susp.                         Diss.
           Temp.    mittance   Solids      COD              Oxygen
            °C         %       mg/1      mg/J     pH       rhg/1

Influent

  Feb
  Mar
  Apr
  .May
  June
  July
  Aug
  Sept
  Oct

Pond 1

  Feb      10.4                  31          95       7.9       20.0
  Mar      10.9                  42        100       8.2       19.5
  Apr      16.6                  48          91       8.2       18.2
  May      19.4                  21          48       8.0       12.0
  June     22.5                  31          73       8.4       22.8
  July      24.7                  66        122       9.2       18.6
  Aug      25.0                  73          89       9.2       20.0
  Sept      22.2                  49        111       8.3       13.4
  Oct      16. 1                  48          88       8.2       21.9

Pond 2
84.5
86. 0
88.7
85.3
87.5
88. 1
86.0
83.7
82.2
23
23
15
17
14
31
18
21
21
76
67
71
43
32
43
43
69
51
7.0
7.0
7.1
7.0
7. 1
7.2
7.2
7. 1
7.2
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
12.7
14.9
18. 1
20.6
22.2
25.2
25.8
23.6
20.1
93.7
94.1
93.4
90.9
81.5
78.7
74.3
79.6
80.1
8
12
11
16
30
35
42
32
16
69
68
56
34
35
60
58
80
38
7.4
7.4
7.7
7.8
7.9
8.7
9.0
8.2
7.6
1.0
0.8
4.6
2. 5
7.0
5.6
12.4
5. 3
1.8
                              16

-------
Pond 2.  Algae production during the summer months of July and August
was almost twice as great as  it was throughout the spring.

The COD values (Figure 11) alsojreflect the transformation of inorganic
carbon to organic form in Pond 1,  and its  removal in Pond 2.  Overall
COD reductions were substantial during the spring period of high
Daphnia  activity, but were small or negative during the summer.  Or-
ganic carbon analyses made during the spring are given in Table 3.  The
samples were composited from once-daily grabs over the periods  indi-
cated.   Results are quite parallel to the COD's.
        Table 3.  TOTAL ORGANIC CARBON DETERMINATIONS
                          Values in mg/1 C

        Period          Influent         Pond 1        Pond 2
      2/24 - 3/12         15.8           25.2           11.6
      3/15 - 3/31         17.2           35.6           15.0
      4/1  - 4/19         14.2           18.4           12.4
      4/20 - 4/30         12.0           19.8           10.2
NUTRIENT REMOVAL

Nutrient Removals achieved by the system are shown in Table 4, which
displays monthly average nitrogen and phosphate concentrations, and
on Figures  12 through 16.   The removals given in Table 4 are the dif-
ferences between plant influent and effluent concentrations.  Signifi-
cance levels are based on Student's  "t" distribution using the statistic
t=(xl -  X2>/(s \Tl/ni + l/n2).  Here x^ and x~2 are the measured average
concentrations for a given month,  nj and n2are the numbers of sam-
pies contributing to the averages,  and s  = -s/ [(nj - l)sf + (n2 - Us^ /
(nj + n2 - 2), where sj and s2 are the sample standard deviations. The
number of degrees of freedom is nj + n2 - 2.   The notation N.S.  means
that the removal was not significant at the 10 percent level.

Performance in this respect was mediocre throughout the cold weather
months, but in May there was significant reduction in both nutrients.
Best performance was in July and August, when the overall removals
were 48% for nitrogen and 63% for phosphate.  It may be noted that
most of the nitrogen removal occurs in Pond 2.  In Pond 1, the nitrogen

                                17

-------
is incorporated into the algal cells, and in Pond 2 the algae are inges-
ted by Daphnia and other higher organisms and converted to settleable
solids.  On the other hand, the bulk of the phosphate is removed in the
first pond, evidently through precipitation as the result of the high pH
environment generated by the algae.
    Table 4.  MONTHLY AVERAGE NUTRIENT CONCENTRATIONS
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
Influent

  15.2
  16.1
  13.4
  12.0
  12.8
  15.3
  13.6
  18.4
  18.6
                        Total Nitrogen, mg/1
Pond 1

 15.8
 14.3
 12.2
 11.3
 11.1
 14.0
 14.4
 15.6
 17.8
Pond 2

 13.5
 11.6
  9.8
  8.6
 11.4
  7.9
  6.9
 10.3
 11.2
Removal

   1.7
   3.5
   3.6
   3.4
   1.4
   7.4
   6.7
   8.1
   7.4
Significance
 Level, %

    1.5
    0.1
    1.0
    0.2

    0.1
    0.1
    0.1
    5.5
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
Influent

  28.4
  28.9
  27.2
  27.7
  29.0
  29.5
  29.3
  34. 8
  24.4
                       Total Phosphate,  mg/1

                      Pond 1    Pond 2    Removal
27.0
27.5
25.5
21.4
26.1
13.5
17.7
23.1
23.7
27.3
27.6
24.8
16.6
25.8
10.5
10.9
18.2
23.9
                      1.4
                      1.4
                      1.7
                      6.3
                      2.9
                     17.0
                     11.6
                     11.7
                      0.7
                     Significance
                      Level, %

                         N.S.
                         9.3
                         N.S.
                         0.3
                         N.S.
                         0.1
                         0.1
                         8.5
                         N.S.
Balances on the amounts of nutrients passing through Ponds land 2 are
given in Tables 5 and 6.  There was very little net change in nitrate
                               18

-------
nitrogen in either pond,  but in Pond 1 part of the ammonia nitrogen was
converted to organic, which was then removed in Pond 2.  A similar
conversion of soluble phosphate to insoluble phosphate occurred in
Pond 1,  although here it is probable  that most of the insoluble phosphate
formed was inorganic.  Algal cells contain only about two percent phos-
phate, compared to around nine percent nitrogen.  At any rate, during
July and August more than half of the phosphate entering Pond 1 remain-
ed there.

Collection devices had been placed on the bottom of both ponds for the
purpose of acquiring samples of deposited settleable material.  Kjeldahl
nitrogen accumulated at the rate of about 4. 5 kg per month in Pond 1,
and at about  5. 5 kg per month in Pond 2, during the summer period
(May through August).  These figures agree reasonably well with the
nitrogen removals shown in Table 5.   Phosphate accumulated on the
bottom on Pond 2  at about one pound  per month, again in agreement with
the liquid measurements.  However the Pond 1 bottom samples contain-
ed little or no phosphate above background,  suggesting that the removed
phosphate may have been deposited on the concrete pond lining in crysta-
line form.

On September 24, 1971, a phosphate  tracer  was injected into Pond 1 for
the purpose of observing the distribution process.   The tracer was 40
rnillicuries of phosphorus-32  prepared by neutron activation of ammonium
diacid phosphate.  Samples  of the liquid and bottom sediment in Pond 1
were taken for two weeks, as well as liquid and Daphnia samples from
Pond 2.  Filtered and unfiltered portions were later dried on planchets
and counted using a thin-window Geiger system.   The results are shown
graphically in Figure 6.  There was  very rapid initial disappearance of
filtrable phosphate; within two days some 65 percent had been either
precipitated or converted to suspended solids.  Tracer removed from
the liquid reached a peak of 45 percent in five days  and then slowly be-
gan to reappear,  perhaps by exchanging with non-radioactive phosphate.
Samples of bottom sediment showed the same level of radioactivity as
the interior liquid, again suggesting  precipitation rathe;; than sedimen-
tation as the  dominant mechanism.  The peak in the fraction converted
to suspended form may be only apparent since the concentrations were
changing rapidly at that time, and the mass  balance calculation hence
subject to inaccuracy.  In any case,  transformations in the pond were
essentially complete in five days.  From then on the only changes which
occurred were the washout of remaining suspended and filtrable tracer,
and the gradual return of tracer  previously removed from the liquid.

                                19

-------
                       Table 5.  NITROGEN BALANCE
                             (Figures in kg N)
Pond 1
            Input
        NB^'-N   NO3-N
                     Output
Total     Org N   NH3-N   NO3-N
Total   Decrease
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
10.8
6.2
6.0
2.5
8.9
9.8
3.8
16.0
10.5
50.5
32. 1
42.0
56.2
21.4
44.2
24.1
69.2
45.7
13. 1
16.1
20.5
24.6
12.9
1.7
1.2
1.2
0.7
70.6
54.4
68.6
83.3
43.2
55.6
29.0
86.4
56.9
18.0
12. 7
11.9
12.0
14. 1
22.0
18.0
22.9
16.2
43. 1
18.6
36.1
47.4
10.4
26.9
12.0
47.8
37.0
12.0
17.0
14.2
19.0
12.8
1.8
0.8
1.7
1.2
73. 1
48.3
62.2
78.4
37.3
50.7
30.6
72.4
54.4
-2.5
6.1
6.4
4.9
5.9
4.9
-1.6
14.0
2.5
-3.5
11.3
9.3
5.9
13.6
8.7
-5.6
16.2
4.3
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
11.7
10.4
8.8
3.9
0.4
11. 1
11.2
6.2
6.0
27.8
19.1
24.8
7.4
8.7
2.7
2.2
10.4
14.2
8.7
15.7
9.4
8.8
5.4
1.0
0.3
0.3
0.5
48.2
45.2
43.0
20. .1
14.5
14.8
13.7
16.9
20.7
2.8
3. 1
3.3
2.0
1.4
3.9
3.5
2.5
4.1
29.6
20.8
21. 1
8.8
7.3
3.4
2.4
7.7
12.1
8.9
13.0
10.0
6.8
4.3
1.0
0.2
0. 1
0.5
41.4
37.0
34.4
17. 7
13.0
8.4
6. 1
10.3
16.6
6.8
8.2
8.6
2.4
1.5
6.4
7.6
6.5
4. 1
14.2
18.2
19. 9
12.2
10.3
43. 3
55.5
38. 7
19. 7

-------
                    Table 6.  PHOSPHATE BALANCE
                          (Figures in kg PO4)
Pond 1


Feb
Mar
Apr
May-
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct

Sol
117. 4
91.6
133.7
182. 1
88.5
100.3
60.6
155.6
71.3
Input
Insol
14.2
5.9
5.2
10.2
9.2
6.4
1.8
8.2
3.2

total
131.6
97.5
138.9
192.3
97.7
106.7
62.4
163.8
74.5

Sol
119. 0
86.2
120.0
143.8
77. 5
10.2
25.4
103. 0
70. 3
Output
Insol
6.1
6.6
14.6
5.2
10.2
42. 1
12.5
5.6
4.4

'Total
125. 1
92.8
130.6
149.0
87.7
52.3
37.9
108.6
74.7

Decrease
6.4
4.7
8.3
43.3
10. 0
54.4
24.5
55.2
-0.2

%
4.9
4.8
6. 0
22. 5
10.2
60. 0
39.4
33.7
0.0
Pond 2
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
77.9
82.0
65.4
16.8
25.8
3.4
7.3
23.8
26.0
5.0
6.2
18.2
8.7
4.6
8.9
5.9
1.3
1.6
82. 9
88.2
83.6
25. 5
30.4
12.3
13.2
25. 1
27.6
80.2
86.7
85.6
28. 1
29.6
9. 5
6.7
19.0
27. 5
3.4
1.5
0.4
1.7
1.0
1.7
2.2
0.4
3.4
83.6
87.6
86.0
29.8
30.6
11.2
8.9
19.4
30. 9
-0.7
0.6
-2.4
-4.3
-0.2
1. 1
4.3
5.7
-3.3
-0. 1
0. 1
-2.9
-17. 1
-0.6
9.2
32.3
22.8
-11.8

-------
               DISTRIBUTION  OF  PHOSPHATE  TRACER
tx>
t\3
                                      REMOVED FROM LIQUID
DISPLACED FROM POND
IN FILTRABLE FORM
                       CONVERTED TO
                       SUSPENDED FORM
                                           FILTRABLE TRACER
                                           IN POND LIQUID

                                                                          m
                             TIME, DAYS

-------
 BIOLOGICAL CONDITIONS

 Populations of Chlorella and Daphnia throughout the year are shown in
 Figures 17 and 18.  Small numbers of other algae were occasionally
 observed, but Chlorella strongly predominated and cell counts  of this
 genus were therefore,used as a measure of algal population. Although
 the cell concentrations during February and March were similar to
 those  reached in July,  it should be noted that the average cell size was
 much  smaller in the earlier period, and the biomass  concentration was
 much  greater in summer.  The suspended  solids determination pro-
 vides  a more significant measure of algal substance.

 Like Chlorella among the Pond 1 algae, Daphnia pulex was the  sole
 dominant invertebrate organism of Pond 2.  Various water bugs occur-
 red, including some fairly large  types,  but none in appreciable mass
 concentrations compared to the Daphnia.  No other cladoceran  species
 were encountered.  The low temperature reached in Pond 2 never
 caused complete cessation of asexual reproduction, and they remained
 at high concentrations in the face of a hydraulic detention time  of five
 days (pond volume divided by overflow).  The actual wash-out rate of
 the organisms could be  somewhat less because of rheotaxis; the Daphnia
 tended to swim "upstream" in the vicinity of the outlet weir. Through-
 out the winter-spring season the  Daphnia produced winter eggs (ephip-
 pia).  These tended to float and frequently  collected on the leeward side
 of Pond 2 as a granular scum.  The period of ephippia production was
 approximately November through April.

 The potential clarification effect of Daphnia can be estimated from the
 filtration rates which have been measured  by others.   A conservatively
•low  value is  5 ml/day for an average organism.  At this rate 100 or-
 ganisms per liter would be sifting their medium once every two days.
 Since  Pond 2's Daphnia concentrations were frequently above 1000
 organisms per liter it is not surprising that they were able virtually to
 eliminate the algae at such times.

 With the onset of summer the Daphnia population in Pond 2 began to fall
 off unaccountably.  The cause is  not known; possibilities include warm
 water  temperatures (above 22° C), activity of some unrecognized pre-
                                     O
 dator, and some toxic factor.  RytherJ has found definite experimental
 evidence that senescent Chlorella cells contain a substance which inhi-
 bits growth and reproduction  of Daphnia magna feeding upon them,

                                 23

-------
while rapidly growing algae exhibit no such antagonistic effect.  At any
rate, with the Daphnia concentration less than 100 per liter,  as  it was
most of the time from June to October,  removal of algae was not com-
plete.

Biological upsets of the algae population in Pond 1 occurred in almost
periodic fashion at approximately two-month intervals. The first time,
in September, 1970, Daphnia invaded the pond and slaughtered most of
the algae.  After recovery a school of Gambusia was introduced, and
it appeared to be holding the Daphnia under control,  since the fish were
observed occasionally in small concentrations for six months.  Minor
raids on the algae happened in December and February, but were  read-
ily controlled by temporarily increasing the flow.  However, a serious
Daphnia pulse came on suddenly about the first of April.  The algae
were nearly wiped out, but normal conditions were restored  in about
a •week by maintaining a high flow rate.  Another  invasion began about
May 15.   This time flushing  for several days brought little change,
and the pond was drained.  After refilling,  the algae population was
quickly reestablished, but it built up rather slowly during June,  and
finally reached a peak level around the middle of  July.  The next upset
was  a bloom of rotifers which appeared suddenly at the end of July.
Flushing for two days  brought the rotifers under control.  Algae recov-
ery was slow; at the end of August their population was about half  of
the July peak when a second rotifer bloom again cut them down.   The
deterioration in Pond 1 phosphate removal during  times of low algae
concentration can be seen in Figure 16.

Intensity of photosynthesis which occurred in Pond 1 is indicated by the
pH and alkalinity data  of Figures 19 and 20, and by dissolved oxygen
concentrations given in Table 2.  The most sensitive measure is pH.
Influent pH was  rather steady throughout the year  at about 7.2.  In the
pond, however,  the removal of carbon dioxide by photosynthesis re-
sulted in higher pH values at nearly all times, with peaks of 10 being
reached under the intense light conditions of summer days.   Lapses in
photosynthetic activity caused by loss ,of the algae population are clear-
ly apparent in the pH record. In Pond 2 the pH was normally about 7. 4,
the carbon dioxide having been restored by the  respiration of higher
organisms, principally Daphnia.  The drop in population of these crea-
tures which occurred with the onset of summer allowed the pH to re-
main elevated during this period.   The alkalinity  record is also affected
by photosynthesis,  though less dramatically.  The removal of carbon
dioxide itself does  not alter alkalinity, but the incorporation of ammonia

                                24

-------
nitrogen into algal protein and the precipitation of carbonates and
phosphates at raised pH both consume alkalinity at nearly stoichio-
metric ratios. Alkalinity reductions in Pond 1 coincided with periods
of strong pH rise.  In Pond 2  the alkalinity loss persisted although the
pH had been brought back down by new carbon dioxide.

Dissolved oxygen remained high in Pond 1 during the entire period of
operation.   Peak daytime values of over 40 mg/1 were experienced
when the algae were actively growing.  Influent oxygen demand was
relatively low and as a result the nightly drop in D. O.  due to respira-
tion was not pronounced.  Typical early morning D. O. readings were
around 5 mg/1 lower than the afternoon highs, meaning that Pond 1
was supersaturated most of the time.  In the winter and spring months
the D. O. levels in  Pond 2 were quite low,  mostly because of Daphnia
respiration.   The oxygen consumption rate of Daphnia is on the order
of 0.25 mg/day/mg dry weight .  At 1000 organisms per liter and
average  organism weight of 0. 02 mg, respiration "would amount to
5 mg/I/day.   Exertion of BOD in the pond liquid and bottom sediments
would also reduce dissolved oxygen.

Later, when the Daphnia population had fallen off, there were wide
daily  fluctuations in the dissolved oxygen on Pond 2.  High influent
D. O.  and some photo synthetic activity produced supersaturation in
the daytime, while respiration (of bottom  sediments and a varied
pelagic population) lowered the oxygen during the night down to a few
milligrams per liter.   Lack of oxygen by itself was probably not the
reason for disappearance of the Daphnia,  since they thrived at con-
siderably lower D.  O.  levels earlier in the year.
                                25

-------
                            SECTION VII

                       DESIGN IMPLICATIONS
From a nutrient removal standpoint, optimization of the process con-
sists in achieving both maximum algae growth and complete algae
entrapment.  The inorganic carbon in the feed should be photosynthe-
sized to an extent which raises the pH above 10, since only then will
there be extensive precipitation of phosphate.  Uptake of nitrogen is
also proportional to algae production.  To accomplish relatively com-
plete conversion  the hydraulic throughput must be controlled so as to
pace the growth rate.  Basically this means giving each volume of
liquid its due quota of solar radiation.  During portions of July and
August when the pH of Pond 1 was being driven above 10, the hydraulic
feed rate was about 11 cm/day.   It may be inferred that this application
rate represents an approximate upper limit for good carbon conversion
in the summertime.  The corresponding algae production was about
11 gm/sq m/day.  To obtain equal results in the winter, when tempera-
tures and light intensity are both lower, would  require a considerable
reduction in surface loading.

In the algae stage it is desirable to maintain as shallow a depth as
possible, consistent with total absorption of impinging light.   For  a
given pond surface area, shallower depth is associated with shorter
residence time; short average generation time  for the algae is desir-
able for maintaining a vigorous culture and minimizing loss of synthe-
sized tissue by endogenous respiration. Since  the phosphate removal
process  is substantially complete in a few days, it would seem possible
to reduce the Pond 1 depth from 1.4m used to  1.0m or less with some
advantage.

Under favorable environmental conditions  Daphnia begin to produce
broods of young at an age of less than two  weeks.  Each brood contains
around a dozen new organisms, so that the effective generation time is
only one or two days.  As far as maintenance of the Daphnia population
is concerned,  the second-stage detention time could be very short, but
it is also necessary to attain complete algae removal.  The Daphnia
can easily  consume their own weight in algae each day.  Using this as
a loading criterion, the detention time should be at least equal to the

                                26

-------
weight ratio of algae feed concentration to Daphnia pond concentration.
A parallel criterion is  that the pond detention time should be several
times the turnover time for Daphnia filtration.  Under normal circum-
stances the feed ratio criterion would control.   With an algae concen-
tration of 50 mg/1 and a Daphnia population  consisting of 500 organisms
per liter with 0. 02 mg  average weight,  the detention time should be at
least five days.

Depth in the Daphnia stage  does not seem to be critical. Economics
of construction and maintenance suggest using a fairly deep pond, on
the order of  5 meters.   One feature  of probable importance is provision
for seasonal cleaning.  When the Daphnia are filtering  effectively, most
of the organic nitrogen received by the  pond as algae remains  as bottom
sediment.  Removal once a year, by draining and scraping, for exam-
ple, would prevent the eventual resuspension of the deposited nutrients.

Predator incursions in the  algae stage are a major operating problem.
Control of these higher organisms by mechanical screening may be
feasible,  but such measures would destroy the system's principal vir-
tue of simplicity and low cost.  Another means  of coping with predator
plagues would  be to divide  the algae pond into multiple  compartments,
so that not all  of the algal biomass would be simultaneously exposed.
Upon the appearance of Daphnia  in one compartment, it would be  drained
and refilled with culture from an adjacent unit.   To reduce opportunity
for seeding of  the algae stage with Daphnia,  it would be helpful to sepa-
rate the  two  pond stages physically.  A free overflow weir at the  outlets
of all algae units will prevent entry of Daphnia which might have worked
their way upstream.
                                 27

-------
                           SECTION VIII

                           REFERENCES
1.    Richman, S. , The Transformation of Energy by Daphnla
      pulex.  Ecol. Monographs.  28:273,  1958.

2.    Bennett, G.  W. , Management of Lakes and Ponds.  New York,
      Van Nostrand Reinhold,  1971. 365 p.

3.    Ryther,  J. H. ,  Inhibitory Effects of  Phytoplankton upon the
      Feeding of Daphnia magna with Reference to Growth, Reproduc
      tion and Survival.  Ecology.  35:522, 1954.
                                28

-------
                                                                                AVERAGE    TEMPERATURE

                 SEPTEMBEB ,    OCTOBER      NOVEMBER  ,   DECEMBER       JANUARY    ,  FEBRUARY  ,   MARCH          APRIL        MAY	,     JUNe          JULY        AUGUST     -JJPTEMBLR      OCTQBEFt
ro
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        CTQ
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         p
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         -i
                                                                                                                                                                                                                         n>
                 SEPTEMBER      OCTOBER     NOVEMBER
                                                           DECEMBER
                                                                  1970
 JANUARY

1971
                                                                                       FEBRUARY       MARCH        APRIL          MAV          JUNE

-------
>-
<
a
o
o   0
o.
Ul
a
Ul
to
5
                          HYDRAULIC  TURN-OVER   RATE

JANUARY  .  ftaiBMRt .   MARCH   .   APRIL   ,    MAY  '97'   JUNE        JULY
       •+•
f
                                                                                 _AuaugT    .  KPTEMBER .    OCTOaER
                                                                                 ™"'  '   ""' "I"	    \	 I «5
            POND NO. I
            POND NO. 2
       JANUARY   ' FEBRUARY  '   MARCH    '  APRIL
                                                   MAY   ^    JUNE    '    JULY     '  AUGUST    '  SEPTEMBER1   OCTOBER
                                                       1971
                                                                                                                                      TO
                                                                                                                                       oo

-------
                                                              LIQUID   CLARITY
         SEPTEMBER  i   OCTOBER  I  NOVEMBER  I  DECEMBER	JANUARY
                                                                    FEBRUARY  i    MARCH
                                                                                                                             JULY    i   AUOU5T    . SEPTEMBER  .   OCTOBER
         TRANSPARENCE
 o
. z
 X
 
         SEPTEMBER  '   OCTOBER   '  NOVEMBER I   DECEMBER      JANUARY  I   FEBRUARY  '   MARCH

                                                   1970   97

-------
                                                                  SUSPENDED  SOLIDS
                                                       1970  1971
        |20   SEPTEMBER  |  OCTOBER    j  NOVEMBER   j  DECEMBER  [   JANUARY   |  FEBRUARY  j    MARCH   j    APRIL
        80
        40
        200
        160
KJ
        120
        BO
4O





0


120
        40
        0  <-
                                                                                                                          .    JULV	i    AUGUST   . SEPTEMBER  .  OCTOBER   ^n
                    INFLUENT
                    POND 1
                    POND 2
                                   juu
              SEPTEMBER  '    OCTOBER  '  NOVEMBER
                                                DECEMBER
                                                       1970
                                                     JANUARY
                                                    (971
                                                                          FEBRUARYr   MARCH
                                                                                                                                                                                  80
                                                                                                                                                                                  40
                                                                                                                                                                                  200
                                                                                                                                                                                  160
                                                                                                                                                                                  130
                                                                                                                                                                                   8O
                                                                                                                                                                                  40
                                                                                                                                                                                  0


                                                                                                                                                                                  120
                                                                                                                                                                                  80
                                                                                                                                                                                  40
                                                                                                                                                                                       ora
                                                                                                                                                                                        (S
                                                                                                                                                                                        H
                                                                                                                                                                                        O
                                                                                                                                                 AUGUST   ' SEPTEMBER '   OCTOBER

-------
                                                    CHEMICAL  OXYGEN   DEMAND.  UNFILTERED
                                         U70  I»7I                                         '
StfTtMBEB  1  OCiOatR  .  MOVEMBER  |  DECEMBER   | JANUARY    .  FEBRUARY   i   MARCH    i   APRIL    I    MM     i   JUNE    i    JULY    I  AUGUST
                                                                                                                                            SEPTEMBER  .  OCTOBER
                                                                                                                                                             120
ioo




ao




60




40


IZO




00




60




60




4O




100




SO




60



40
      INFLUENT
                                                                                                                                                            100
                                                                                                                                                             80
                                                                                                                                                            60
                                                                                                                                                            40


                                                                                                                                                            120
                                                                                                                                                            100
                                                                                                                                                            80
                                                                                                                                                            60
                                                                                                                                                            40
                                                                                                                                                            100
                                                                                                                                                            80
                                                                                                                                                            60
O
2

Q
O
u
       POND 2.
             OCTOBER  '   NOVEMBER '  DECEMBER   I  JANUARY   '  PEaRUABy  I  MARCH    I"
                                        (•70 | O7I
                                                                                                 «*Y  '  '    JUNE    1    JULV    'AUOUST   ' SEPTEMeER '   OCTOBER
                                                                                                                                                                 era

-------
                                         TOTAL  KJELDAHL  NITROGEN
                                  (•70 I ItTt
MPTCMMR . OCTOBER . NOVEMBER i DECEMBER
JANUARY PEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY , JUNE JULY
INFLUENT




•
POND 1

.
•
-
POND 2
•
•
•
•
•


































•EPTtMBER ' OCTOBER ' NOVIMWR ' DECEMBER
ItTO







AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER

















































































































































































































































































































































































•
•
•
•
.
-
•



.




JANUARY ' FEBRUARY ' MARCH APRIL ' MAY ' JUNE JULY ' AUGUST SEPTEMBER OCTOBER
1*71
8
16
4
2
K>
6
4
t
0
14
12
10
6
4
2
0
12
10
8
6
4
Z
0
IS
18
14
12
10
a
8
4
X
o
14
12
to
8
8
4
                                                                                                                              OQ

-------
OJ
       z
        I

        *1
IS
10
»
0
15
10
5
0
15
10
6
0
l«70
SEPTEMBER • OCTOBER i NOVEMBER , DECEMBER
1971
JANUAf
IjjFLUENT

-
POND 1

•
POND 2
-
-






















l«70

















AMMONIA NITROGEN
1 I FEBRUARY MARCH *






































APRIL











































1871
MAY JUNE




















MAY JU^fe "
. JULY i AUGUST . SEPTEMB















1



1
till
ER















1
JULY ' AUGUS



OCTOBER








•
-

-
-
-
T SEPTEMBER OCTOBER
IS
10
5
0
15
10
5
0
IS
10
5
0

-------
w








X
o
2
z*
1
f








6
4
Z

6

4


• 2

0
e

4
2
0
INFLUENT
-

-
•

POND 1


•
•




POND Z
•
-
"
. SEPTEMBER ' OCTOBER '

tw iv
NOVEMBER i DECEMBER



















l>





,







1 1 , ,





1 1 1
NOVEMBER ' DECEMBER
1*70
JANUARY
























.













|
JANUf


















|
1RY

































,
|




1
|

FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY











































































































































FEBRUARY 1 MAR


















H ' APRIL ' MAY





















| JUNE JULY | AUCUiT ( SEPTEMBER j OCTOBER





-
-
-
ii i i ! , 1 ,.ll . . .1,








;

-
-

H . 1 1 H h i . , i • 1 1 1 it



-


-
HI . 1 1 1 1. 1. , , ii i H
1 JUNE ' JULY ' AUGUST ' SEPTEMBER ' OCTOBER
1*71

-------
                                                              TOTAL   PHOSPHATE.   UNFILTERED
       SEPTEMBER   i  OCTOBER   i  NOVEMBER  .   DECEMBER      JANUARY  i   FEBRUARY  j   MARCH    i   APRIL
                                                                                                                                JULY     i   AUGUST    , SEPTEMBER   .   OCTOBER
  40
   30
   20
   10
              INFLUENT
                                                                                                                                                                            40
                                                                                                                                                                            30
                                                                                                                                                                            20
                                                                                                                                                                            10
   30
0*
Q.
   20
   10
   30
   10
              POND  I
               POND 2
                                                                                                                                                                            30
                                                                                                                                                                            30
                                                                                                                                                                            ZO    r—
                                                                                                                                                                            10
        SEPTEMBER  I  OCTOBER   I  NOVEMBER
DECEMBER
      1970 I
                                                        JANUARY
                                                       [971
                                                                 IFEBRUARY
                                                                                                                                                     SEPTEMBER

-------
        30
         20
         10
OD
         30
         20
         10
          0




         30
         20
         10
1970 1 1971
SEPTEMBER i OCTOBER i NOVEMBER i DECEMBER 1 JANUAI
INFLUENT

POND 1

•
POND 2
•
•





SEPTEMBER > OCTOBER I NOVEMBER ' CM



























IUI AL KMU^KMAI t* NLJ LKtU
*Y FEBRUARY MARCH i APRIL i M


































































AY JUNE JULY i AUCU ST










































III ,



. SCPT


1






1
CEMBCR 1 JANUARY ' FEBRUARY 1 MARCH ' APRIL 1 MAY '. JUNE 1 JULY 1 AUGUST
1970 ' 1471












'SEPT
EM






.MB
Eft OCTOBER


















Eft OC







-




T06CR
-




30
20
10
0
30
20
10
0
30
20
10
0

-------
               JEPTtMiCR     OCTOBER
                                          NOVEMBER
                                                             1*70   UTI

                                                      DECEMBER ,     JANUARY
                                  CHLORELLA

                                  FEBRUARY  i    MARCH
                                                                                                                                      JUNE         JULY-        AUGUST      SEPTEMBER      OCTOBER
                                                                                                                                               |
                       POND
           20
                                                                                                                                                                                                    20
           16
           12
OO
       «r
       in
       s
       10
       _l

       111
       o
II III I I I,,
                       POND  2
                SEPTEMBER  '   OCTO
life III I I II
                                                                   ub l
I JiJ JH   i  inn ;    4 il. I.
                                          MOVCMBER  '   DECEMBER      JANUARY

                                                             ItTO I  I»TI
                                                                                                                 IL J
                                                                                                                                                                                                   16
                                                                                                                           SEPTEMBER  '  OCT BER
                                                                                                                                                                                                         C
                                                                                                                                                                                                         ^
                                                                                                                                                                                                        .(D

-------
  2200


  2OOO


  1800


  I «00


  (400


  1200


  1000


   BOO


   600


   400


   200


     0


    60
O
O
                                                      1970 .  1971
         SEPTEMBER     OCTOBER  ,  NOVEMBER  [   DECEMBER  |   JANUARY   |
POND 2  DAPHNIA
                POND 2  COLOR
                                                                                                                                                SEPTEMBER
                                                                                                                                                              OCTOBER
2200


2000


ieoo


1600


1400


1200


1000


BOO


6OO


4OO


ZOO


0


eo
                                                                                                                                                                                              c

                                                                                                                                                                                              fl>
                                                                                                                                                                                              H-"
                                                                                                                                                                                              00
                                                                                                                            JUNE
                                                                                                                                                    AUGUST    'SEPTEMBER     OCTO E f

-------
     SEPTEMBER i  OCTOBER   ,  NOVEMBER
                             T-


                             INFLUENT
                                                  1970

                                            DECEMBER
             (971

              JANUARY
                                                                       FEBRUARY      MARCH         APRIL
                                                                                                                              JUNE         JULY	i  AUGUST    j  SEPTEMBER  .   OCTOBER
10
                                                                                                                                                                                             10
                                                                                                                                                                                             7
                             POND
&"CE'M'BER  "I ""jAMr	"VE'SRUARY" t	M'AR'CH"" 'V "'AP'R'I'L'

      1970 I 1971
                                                                                                                                                                                                    I?.
                                                                                                                                                                                                   tw'
     SEPTEMBER 'OCTOBE
                                                                                                                 MA
                                                                                                                                           JULY     '   AUCU      ' SEPTEMBER  '  OCTOBER

-------
ro
300



250



200



ISO



100

300



250



ZOO •



ISO
                                                                   TOTAL  ALKALINITY
                                                     1970 -  1071
             SEPTEMBER  i  OCTOBER  ,  NOVEMBER • OECtMBCR   i   JANUARY   ,  rEBftUARY  ,  MARCH        APRIL        MAY
                                                                                                                                         |  AUGUST    , SEPTEMBER     OCTOBER
        100

        275

        250



        200



        150



        100
                   INFLUENT
                   POND
           POND  2
                                                                                                          MAY     I   JUNE
                                                                                                                                 JU Y       AUOU
                                                                                                                                                                            300
                                                                                                                                                                            250
                                                                                                                                                                            ZOO
                                                                                                                                                                            150
                                                                                                                                                                            100

                                                                                                                                                                            300
                                                                                                                                                                            250
                                                                                                                                                                            200
                                                                                                                                                                            ISO
no

275

250
                                                                                                                                                                    20O  „.'.
                                                                                                                                                                         TO
                                                                                                                                                                    ISO   fD
                                                                                                                                                                         IX)
                                                                                                                                                                         O
                                                                                                                                                      SEPTEMBER  '  OCTOBER
                                                                                                                                                                            00

-------
ISO
120
100
60
ISO
120
100
00
ISO
120
100

ao
(EPTtMBER , OCTOBER . NOVEMBER , DECEMBER
INFLUENT
•
•

I i I
POND 1
.
-
r

1 i F
POND 2




KPTCMBER ' OCTOBER ' NOVEMBER ' DECEMBER 1
I*TO 1
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH
























1 1






































































1



JANUARY ' FEBRUARY ' MARCH '
1*11
APRIL




















APRIL


















1







1














..













1 MAV
JUNE , JUtr AUGUST , SEPTEMBER OCTOBER



1



iilllihiilr
II11


1
I



-

in , in .
i i * *


i
.



i i . Illll
JUNE ' JULY ' AUGUST ' SEPTEMBER ' OCTOBER
ISO
120
too
80
ISO
120
100
80
SO
20 • !?.
TO
0
OO CD
to
t— 1
80

-------
 SELECTED WATER
 RESOURCES ABSTRACTS
 INPUT TRANSACTION FORM
                                 ort So.
                                                3.  Acc-.-r'oK'ffr
                                                w
 4.  Title  Tertiary Treatment with a Controlled
         Ecological System
 /. Author($)   Gram, Andrew L.
 9. Organization Gram/Phillips Associates,  Inc. under contract
             to Las Virgenes Municipal Water District
                                                5,  Re port Da: ^
                                                6.
                                                8.  PerfortttmrOrgat-'zatioB
                                                              10. Project Mo.
 15.  Supplementary Motes

                                               11.  Contract/Grant I'1 v.
                                                  16080 FBH
                                               13.  Type ( " Repor and
                                                   Period Covered
      Environmental Protection Agency report number,
      EPA-660/2-73-022, December 1973.
                                                                                     r, 1
 16.
    Abstract   A two-stage pond system was operated as a process for polishing
     secondary sewage effluent.  The shallow first stage was an oxidation pond
     in which a heavy growth of algae was permitted to develop.   In the second
     stage a population of Daphnia pulex consumed the algae.   Detention times
     were about 10 days in each stage.   Chemical and biological monitoring were
     carried out over a year's period to determine feasibilityof using the process
     to produce recreational-grade water  and reduce algae growth potential.
             While the Daphnia remained as the dominant zooplankton species in
     the second pond throughout the observation period,  their concentration varied
     between 100 and 1, 500 organisms/liter. Excellent water clarity was obtained
     when the Daphnia were above 500 organisms/liter,  and at such times the
     over-all COD reduction was greater than 40 percent.   Significant removal of
     nutrients occurred only during the months  of July and August, when N and P
     reductions were 48 percent and 63 percent respectively.   Performance was
     hampered by occasional invasions  of Daphnia or rotifers in the first-stage pond,
     which decimated the algae.  Such events were not successfully controlled and
     remain the principal obstacle to further process development.

i7a. Descriptors   Waste water  treatment,  Water reclamation, Aquatic biology
17b. Identifiers
Biological processes, Oxidation ponds, Zooplankton
17c. COWRR Field & Group
18. Availability
        IS. S-"urityC'ass.
           (Report)
       i
       ; 20. Security Class.
       I    
21.
K->. of
Pages
                                       22. Price
           Send To:

           WATER RESOURCES SCIENTIFIC INFORMATION CENTER
           U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
           WASHINGTON, D. C. 2O24O
Abstractor  Andrew L. Gram	| Institution  Gram/Phillips Associates, Inc

-------