-------
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
1 8 FEE 1983
MEMORANDUM
Subject: Status of 1982 Ozone State Implementation Flan (SIP)
Data Bases
From: Richard G. Rhoads, Director^^., ^L/3
Monitoring and Data Analysis Division (MD-14)
To: Director, Air Management Division,
Regions I, V, and IX
Director, Air and Waste Management Division,
Regions II-IV, VI-VIII, and X
Director, Environmental Services Division,
Regions I-VIII and X
Director, Office of Technical and Scientific Assistance,
Region IX
I am attaching the eighth and last scheduled quarterly report on the
status of 1982 ozone SIP data bases. This report summarizes the air moni-
toring and emission inventory data in each ozone extension area and reflects
information gathered through contacts with your staff and review of draft
and final SIPs available to us as of February 1, 1983.
We are not providing an overview discussion of the various air quality
modeling and emission inventory issues associated with the SIPs, as we have
done in previous transmittal memoranda. As you know, the approval/disap-
proval status of the SIPs for each of the ozone extension areas was recently
proposed in the February 3, 1983, Federal Register. As such, we believe the
SIPs have reached a point where further overview analysis is no longer neces-
sary. We do hope, however, that our previous comparative analyses have been
helpful to you in identifying and resolving data base related issues.
Nevertheless, we would appreciate the continued support of your staffs
in bringing any updated or corrected SIP data base information to our atten-
tion. Please refer to the Introduction of the attached report to find the
appropriate persons to contact in OAQPS regarding the data bases. We are
particularly interested in the emission data base, since a number of States
have not provided separate 1987 baseline and SIP strategy inventories in their
SIPs. As a result, we have had to make various assumptions, based on limited
information, to develop the emission summary tables in the attached report.
Attachment
cc: S. Meyers, OAQPS
C. Elkins, OANR
R. Smith, OANR
D. Tyler, CPDD
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE STATUS AND SUMMARY REPORT
Table of Contents
Section
1.0 Introduction and Status Summary
1.1 List of Nonattainment Areas and Regional Office Contacts
1.2 Emission Inventory Submission and Review Status Summary
1.3 Air Quality/Modeling Data Status Summary
2.0 Nonattainment Area Summary Data Sheets
2.1 Region I
2.2 Region II
2.3 Region III
2.4 Region IV
2.5 Region V
2.6 Region VI
2.7 Region VII
2.8 Region VIII
2.9 Region IX
2.10 Region X
-------
1.0 Introduction
This report has been prepared to summarize the status and content
of 1982 State Implementation Plan (SIP) data bases and modeling analyses
for ozone nonattainment areas. The information has been included as
obtained from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Regional Offices (ROs)
and other readily available sources, with minimal interpretation. Data
have been continuously compiled during the SIP development period and
distributed quarterly to EPA staff for internal purposes. The report is
intended as a national review resource document. Information for indi-
vidual nonattainment areas may not be as complete and current as is
available to the ROs, which are primarily responsible for review of the
SIPs. Any information or data contained in this report does not construe
approval or disapproval of any portions of the SIPs by EPA.
Comments or corrections to this report are encouraged and may be
directed to the respective Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
(OAQPS) contacts. All contacts are located at the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
Air Quality/Modeling
E. L. Martinez, Chief
Field Investigation Section/AMTB
Mail Drop 14
FTS 629-5575 or (919) 541-5575
Emission Inventories
James H. Southerland, Chief
Source Analysis Section/AMTB
Mail Drop 14
FTS 629-5585 or (919) 541-5585
-------
1.1 1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY - NONATTAINMENT AREAS AND REGIONAL CONTACTS
Region
I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
IX
X
Name
Horn Be loin
Betsy Home
Tom Khali ey
Alan Dion
Cynthia Greene
Art Perritt
Bob Predale
George Ken
Alex Salpeter
Ted Erdman
Craig Han
Doug Cook
Doyle Brittaln
Tom Lyttle
Waymond Blacfcaon
Steve Goranson
John Summerhaya
Ed Doty
Steve Rosenthal
Randy Brown
Donna Ascenzi
John Helvlg
Wayne Leidwaager
Larry Hacker
Bill Baabagill
Paula Macklin
Barry Levene
Bill Bernardo
Butch Rachel
Steve Body
Michael Work
'Ben Alnarlo
Melinda Taplin
Dave Bray
John Schwelss
Mark Hooper
Loren McPhlllipe
Regional Office Contacts
Specialty (ies)
Air Quality Data
Modeling
Emission Inventory (Highway)
Emission Inventory, Control Strategies (CT, RI)
Emission Inventory. Control Strategies (MA)
Air Quality Data
Modeling
Emission Inventory
Control Strategies
Air Quality Data
Modeling, Emission Inventory, Control Strategies
Control Strategies
Air Quality Data
Modeling, Emission Inventory (LVLL)
Modeling, Emission Inventory (NSHVL)
Air Quality Data
Modeling, Emission Inventory
Emission Inventory
Control Strategies
Air Quality Data, Modeling, Emission Inventory
Control Strategies
Air Quality Data
Emission Inventory, Control Strategies
Modeling
Air Quality Data
Control Strategies, Modeling (DNVR)
Modeling, Emission Inventory (SLC)
Emission Inventory (DNVR)
Control Strategies
'Air Quality Data
Modeling
Emission Inventory
Control Strategies
Modeling
Air Quality Data
Emission Inventory
Control Strategies
PTS Number
828-6256
223-5630
223-5130
223-5132
223-5130
264-9800
264-9800
264-9869
264-2517
597-9318
597-2745
257-2865
250-3197
257-2864
257-2864
886-6229
886-6067
886-6058
886-6052
729-1518
729-1518
758-4461
758-3791
758-6525
327-4261
327-6131
327-3711
327-6131
327-6131
454-8205
454-8221
454-8058
454-8062
399-1980
399-1106
399-1949
399-5343
Nonattainment Area
Boston, MA
Springfield, MA
Worcester, MA
Providence, RI
Hartford, CT
New York (NY/CT/NJ)
Trenton, NJ
Philadelphia (PA/NJ/DE)
Pittsburgh, PA
Wilmington, DE
Baltimore, MD
Washington, (DC/VA/MD)
Louisville (KY/IN)
Nashville. TN
Chicago (IV IN)
Cincinnati (OH/KY)
Cleveland, OH
Milwaukee. WI
Houston, TX
St. Louis (MO/IL)
Denver, CO
Salt Lake City, UT
Los Angeles/
San Bernardino, CA
Sacramento, CA
San Francisco, CA
San Diego, CA
Fresno, CA
Ventura/ Omard, CA
Portland (OR/WA)
Seattle. WA
-------
1.2 1982 OZONE SIP EMISSION INVENTORY SUBMISSION AND REVIEW STATUS SUMMARY
Nonat tainment
Area
Massachusetts-ALL
Rhode Island-All
Connecticut-ALL
New York .NY-ONLY
New Jersey-All
Philadephia . PA-ONLY
Pittsburgh, PA
Allen town, PA
Wilmington, DE
Baltimore ,MD
Washington , OC/MD/ VA
Louisville, KY/IN
-shville.TN
.twaukee ,WI
Chicago in,
[IN
Cincinnati ,OH/KY
Cleveland, OH
Detroit, MI
Houston, TX
St. Louis [MO
in.
Denver, CO
Salt Lake City.DT
LA/San Brn'dino.CA
Sacrament o,CA
San Francisco, CA
San Diego, CA
Fresno, CA
Ventura/Oxnard , CA
-.land [OR
[WA
Seattle .WA
Inventory Received
at Headquarters
Nonhighway Highway
3/19/82
3/19/82
4/23/82
1/18/82
1/18/82
3/30/82
2/9/82
8/11/82
1/25/82
1/19/82
7/23/82
12/29/81
12/29/81
7/21/82
3/1/82
2/16/82
4/15/82
2/16/82
8/26/82
4/19/82
3/16/82
3/16/82
2/22/82
3/23/82
1/18/82
1/18/82
1/18/82
1/18/82
1/18/82
1/25/82
2/4/82
4/23/82
4/19/82
2/23/82
3/23/82
4/23/82
1/18/82
1/18/82
3/30/82
7/82
8/11/82
1/25/82
1/19/82
7/23/82
12/29/81
12/29/82
7/21/82
7/82
7/82
4/15/82
2/16/82
8/26/82
4/19/82
3/1/82
3/1/82
2/22/82
3/23/82
1/18/82
1/18/82
1/18/82
1/18/82
1/18/82
1/18/82
2/4/82
5/24/82
5/24/82
Headquarters' Scheduled
Review Completion Date
Nonhighway Highway
6/18/82
6/17/82
7/20/82
3/4/82
3/4/82
7/6/82
3/26/82
10/6/82
3/11/82
5/5/82
7/28/82
2/12/82
2/12/82
8/25/82
4/14/82
4/14/82
6/15/82
4/2/82
9/16/82
6/3/82
6/14/82
6/14/82
5/28/82
6/9/82
3/5/82
3/5/82
3/5/82
3/4/82
3/5/82
3/11/82
3/23/82
7/8/82
6/18/82
Headquarters '
Review Completed
Nonhighway Highway
6/18/82
6/17/82
7/20/82
2/11/82
2/24/82
7/6/82
3/25/82
10/6/82
2/23/82
2/23/82
7/27/82
2/12/82
2/12/82
8/23/82
4/14/82
4/14/82
6/15/82
3/10/82
9/16/82
4/26/82
6/14/82
6/14/82
5/28/82
6/9/82
3/5/82
3/5/82
3/5/82
2/12/82
3/5/82
3/10/82
3/23/82
7/8/82
6/2/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
11/1/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
11/1/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
8/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
11/1/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
11/1/82
11/1/82
11/1/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
7/23/82
11/1/82
7/23/82
Comments (a)
PS DOC. RCV'D 6/18/82
PS/AS DOC. RCV'D 6/17/82
NO PHIL. CO. PS LIST
AS INV. RCV'D 8/11/82
METRO REVIEW, NO PS LIST
NO KY PS LIST
OH PS INV. RCV'D 6/18/82
PS INV. RCV'D 6/28/82
NO PS LIST
NO NOx INV. RCV'D
NO PS LIST
Np PS LIST
Abbreviations: PS - point source; AS - area source; INV. - inventory; DOC. - documentation; RCV'D - received.
-------
U/UNt blf Al ljUALinUAIA/HUULL a blAIUi
Regions
1
11
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII
u
Non.tt.1n.ent Are. Air Quality Data Base Accepted ^' '^.lewed^1"16'' *J" "MoC*""9
Boston, HA / / /
Springfield. HA / / /
Worcester. MA / / /
Providence (RI/MA) / J /
Hartford. CT / /
Hew Haven/ / .
Bridgeport. CT '
New York (NT/NJ/CT) / /
Philadelphia (PVNJ/DE) / / /
Pittsburgh. PA / / /
Allentown. PA / / /
Baltlnore. HD / / j
Washington (DC/HD/VA) / / /
Loulivllle. M / / /
Nashville. TN / / /
Chicago (IL/IH) /
Cincinnati (OH/KT/IN) / / /
Cleveland. OH / / J
Detroit, MI / / /
Hllwaukee, Wl /
Houston. TI / /
St. Louis (MD/ll) /
Denver. CO / / /
Salt Lake City, UT / / /
Los Angeles. CA (SCAB) / / /
Sacranento, CA / / /
San Francisco, CA / / /
San Diego. CA /
Fresno. CA / J
Ventura/Omard. CA / / /
Calculated
S HC Control
35*
35*
40
12*
(48«)
(48*)
60*
44
44
36.7
27. S
49
46
32. S
9.2
(20-41*)
14.3
8.0*
27.1
(29.4-40.
41*
(24.9*)
54
29
as*
50
31
31
70*
42(0jal
9')
Valley)
48(0xnard Plain)
X
Portland. OR/ / / /
Vancouver, HA
Seattle. HA / / /
9.5*
24.3*
Note: / Indicates actlon(s) completed.
* Qualifying footnotes regarding these control values contained In the Individual modeling sheets for
the nonattalnwnt areas.
() Tentative values.
-------
2.0 NONATTAINMENT AREA DATA SUMMARY SHEETS
-------
2.1 Region I
Boston, MA
Worcester, MA
Springfield, MA
Hartford, CT
New Haven/Bridgeport, CT
Providence, RI
o.
I/-.
O)
c
J=
c
c
J-:
1C
C
l+-
c
o
LU
en
^>
LU
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Boston
STATE(s): Massachusetts
REGION:
COUNTIES: Suffork. Barnstable, Dukes. Plymouth. Bristol, Norfolk, and parts of Middlesex.
Worcester (Merrimack Valley. Metropolitan Boston and Southeastern Massachusetts APCD's)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering - All
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC. NO, BASE YEAR: 1980 03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE: 3/9/82 POPULATION; A.583.910 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHICHWAY 6/18/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82 A.838.215 (1987)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
542.343
Point
U9Z)
440.330
Area
(35Z)
250,698
Highway
(46Z)
\
\
\
^ \
\ \
V
V
\
\
\
Point
(16Z)
319.716 / \
•*— '
268,651
Area
(54Z)
97.020
Highway
(30X)
319.716
^.
268,651
Area
(54Z)
97,020
Highway
(30Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1987 1987 (a)
708,263
Point
(37Z)
445,311
Area
(16Z)
332,556
Highway
(47Z)
^ ^ ^
"-^
1*
656,721
Point
(40Z)
391,569
Area
(19Z)
269.369
Highway
(41Z)
Base Baseline S
Year Projection 1
1980 1987
656.721
Point
(40Z)
391,569
Area
(19Z)
269.369
Highway
(41Z)
IP Strategy
Projection
1987
Inventory
Pollutants
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/eap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(b)
VOC NO, VOC NO* VOC NO, VOC NO,
Point Sources 22.3 57.4
Nonhlghway Area 41.3 24.6
Highway 54.7 72.5
TOTAL 118.3 154.5
10.6
35.5
20.0
66.1
54.8
25.3
55.7
135.8
10.6
10.6
20.0
66.1
54.8
25.3
55.7
135.8
-50
- 9
-61
+ 1
+ 8
-19
Number of Facilities Emitting Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 62 NO* (e)
COMMENTS: (a) RACT on major nonRACT sources included in SIP but not in above tables (estimated
at 5.200 TPY statewide). Controls included in SIP are RACT I.II. I/M. TCMs. and all 100+ TPY
sources (including RACT III), (b) Calculated percent change is for total emissions, not
normalised emissions per capita, (c) Only fuel use data supplied for major NO, facilities
sunomarized for entire state (no breakdown by individual plane).
-------
Non-attainment area Boston, MA
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1978, 1979 & 1980 (expected effect of 1981 data
on control strategy to be summarized in final blf.j
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/NW
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? YesflK&C If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes« if Yes, date
8/24/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
Cntan. M
POLLUTANT
IMOC/M>
-------
Non-attainment area Boston, MA
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/TOD; if Yes, date
Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS No
1/29/82
Final Modeling Completed? Yes/M6; if Yes, date
Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
unknown
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/Mo; if Yes, date
unknown
Site-Days
Modeled
NMOC/NOx
Ratio(s)
Nashua, NH #300480005F01
5/30/78
8/15/78
8/13/78
9.4*
9.4*
9.4*
Lexington, MA #22106001F03
7/25/79 9.4*
Georgetown, MA #220730001P05
7/31/79 9.4*
7/25/79 9.4*
8/01/80 9.4*
Portsmouth, MA . #300540009F01
8/01/80 9.4*
Transported
03 Concen-
tration(ppm)
0.033
0.060
0.024
0.085
0.070
0.085
0.118
0.118
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.24
0.160
0.125
0.135
0.128
0.135
0.140
0.132
Calculated
% HC Control
52.1
34.7
8.7
35.2
26.0
13.9
7.1
*Seasonal median 6-9 a.m.
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 35**
o Remarks: **Since both Boston and Springfield contributed to standard exceedancei.
at the Nashua. NH monitor, this % control would ensure that at least one of these
urban areas (Springfield) would not contribute any exceedances while the other,
(Boston) would be allowed one per year.
-------
CITY: Worcester
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(s): Massachusetts
REGION:
COUNTIES: Worcester (most of county). Middlesex (northwest corner) (Central Massachusetts
Air Pollution Control District)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering - ALL
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC, NO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR: 1980
3/9/82
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION; 647.299 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NOKHICHWAY 6/18/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82 674.636 (1987)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
111,407
Point
(25Z)
83.126
Area
(37Z)
41,709
Highway
(38Z)
I
\
\
\
^ \
\ \
\ \
\ ]
\
\
\
\
\
61.979
Point
48.662*
Area
(54Z)
15.521
Highway
(25Z)
I*"*
61.979
Point
T48.662
Area
(54Z)
15.521
Highway
(25Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
I960 1987 1987 (a)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
Area
(17Z) Point « !Z)
\66.872 .
66.667
55.067
Highway
(82Z)
£ 1 ^x.
X
x >
X
X
153,858 ^^|
53,687*"
41,435
Highway
(77Z)
V
Area
(23Z)
53.858
* 53.687
41,435
Highway
(77Z)
Base
Year
1980
Baseline
Projection
1987
SIP Strategy
Projection
1987
Inventory
Pollutants
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(b)
VOC NO. VOC NO. VOC NO- VOC NO,
Polnt Sources 43.7 0.3
Nonhighvay Area 64.0 17.9
Highway 64.4 85.1
TOTAL
172.1
103.3
19.7
49.1
23.0
91.8
0.3
18.1
61.4
79.8
19.7
49.1
23.0
91.8
0.3
18.1
61.4
79.8
-53
-20
-63
-44
-17
+ 6
-25
-19
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 13 NO, (c)
COMMENTS: (a) Credit not included in emission totals for RACT on major nonRACT sources
estimated at 5.200 TPY statewide). Controls included in SIP are RACT I, II. I/M. TQte, and RACT
on all 100+ TPY sources (including RACT III), (b) Calculated percent change is for total
emissions, not normalized emissions per capita, (c) Only fuel use data supplied for major NO,
facilities for entire state (no breakdown by individual plant).
-------
Hon-attainment area Worcester, MA
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1978.1979 & 1980 (expected effect of 1981 data
on control strategy to be summarized in final SIP.)
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/sac
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/MK. If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/IBX; if Yes, date
8/24/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
POLUITMrr
MK/MW
Dim
Dim
0»M
«XOM
MMMD 1
Z226M019F01
Z207MOOIFOJ
Z21060001POS
300MaOQ9R»
sm ID
DM lard. Btlnt St.
feorfctwa H1)h School
Pitting lot
(0 VMtvtaa St.
Vnghn St.
crrr/couiTT
itorcMtir
Qcor9VtflMn
Unlnguii
Portonvth/
RocklnaiUB
am
M
m
m
M
Silt
n«
MN5
WM6
STATKM TYPt
ctnur city/
mtdntUl
suburten/
rnldtntlil
cmttr city/
mldntlil
AVA11ABU
MTA
7B-W-81
7B-«1
1979
»-ai
PMK
HT. (•)
S.4
4.Z
1.1
FROM CC
9S
a
its
FROM RO.
93
12
UT
isra
1000
OTHtR;
IH*d diti collect* M ill iMlliblt tru wind d«u tourctt u»«d to ulict patmtlil •obtllnq diyi
Hind diu fro» mnit UK tutlon (hourly) aid tc cemtnct tnjtctary p«th»
Nlalng htlght diu fn» Portlma. m (toaimondt) ind Sudbyfy. m («eouit1c Soundtr)
• atom only
.0* forHdtllag.
. uud foTBdtllng.
-------
Non-attainment area Worcester. MA
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes /lift; 1
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/FftX; 1f
Transported
Site-Days NMOC/NOX 03 Concen-
Modeled Ratio(s) tratlon(ppm)
Georgetown, MA #220730001F01
7/21/78 8.3* 0.097
7/10/79 8.3* 0.073
'30/78 8.3* 0.071
V17/79 8.3* 0.096
7/08/7B 8.3* 0.08
Lexington, MA 3221060001P05
7/23/79 8.3* 0.11
7/10/79 8.3* 0.073
7/21/79 8.3* 0.093
6/29/79 8.3* 0.06
Portsmouth, MA #300540009F01
7/21/80 8.3* 0.083
6/25/80 8.3* 0.11
*seasonal median 6-9 a.m.
o * HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS
lemarks:
/NO; if Yes, date 1/29/82
OAQPS No
f Yes, date unknown
OAQPS Yes
Only)
Yes, date unknown
Peak 03
Concentration Calculated
(ppm) % HC Control
0.155 39.9
0.144 28.8
0.145 27.4
0.140 17.1
0.125 0
0.16 43.2"
0.16 40.0
0.125 7.2
0.125 0
0.135 13.5
0.127 0
40
-------
CITY: Springfield
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(s): Massachusetts
REGION:
COUNTIES: Franklin. Hampshire, Banyan, and Berkshire (Berkshire and Pioneer Valley Air
Pollution Control Districts)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Quality Engineering - ALL
EMISSION IHVEKTDRY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC. 80, BASE YEAR:
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE: 3/9/82
1980 Oj ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION; 878.270 (19BO)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NOKHICHHAY 6/18/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
918.449 (1987)
133,364
Point
(33Z)
89,022
Area
(282)
51.625
Highway
(39Z)
L
\
\
\
\
V-
\
\
V
\
\
\
i
75.312
Point
(29Z)
53.284
Area
(46Z)
18,918
Highway
<25Z)
— , — —
Base Baseline S]
Year Projection 1
1980 1987
75.322
Point
(29Z)
53.284
Area
(46Z)
18.918
Highway
(251)
LP Strategy
•rejection
1987 (a)
NITROGEN OXIDES
leg/day
Point
(18Z)
99,224
A
81,220
Area
(18Z)
63.678
Highway
(64Z)
X
"~*-^ 91.946 91,946
x.
X
XN
X
Point
(26Z)
67,517
Area
C21Z)
48,473
Highway
(53Z)
Point
(26Z)
67,517
Area
(21Z)
48,473
Highway
(53Z)
Base
Tear
1980
Baseline
Projection
1987
SIP Strategy
Projection
1987
Inventory
Pollutants
VOC
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Baae Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(b)
VOC
HO,
K0_
VOC
MO,
VOC
NO.
Point Sources 50.4 20.5
Nonhighway Area 42.7 20,7
Highway 58.7 71.8
24.1
37.3
20.6
26.6
20.7
52.8
24.1
37.3
20.6
26.6
20.7
52.8
-50
- 8
+36
+ 8
-24
TOTAL
131.8
113.0
82.0
100.1
82.0
100.1
-44
- 7
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TFT): VOC 31 NO, (e)
COMMENTS: (a) Credit not included in emission totals for RaCT en major nonRACT sources
(estimated at 5.200 IPY statewide). Controls included in SIP are RACT I, II, I/M, TCHs. and
RACT on all 100+ TPY sources (including RACT III). (b) Calculated percent change is for total
emissions, not normalised emissions per capita, (c) Only fuel use data supplied for major HO,
facilities summarised for entire state (no breakdown by Individual plant).
-------
Springfield. MA
Non-attainment area
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1978. 1979 & 1980 (expected effect of 1981 data
on control strategy to be summarized in final SIP)
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/Ma
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/M». If No, what 1s missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/MS; if Yes, date
8/24/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used 1n SIP analysis.)
SoHnofltH. H»
POLLUTA*
WOC/»Oi
Oiont
Oiont
Dim
Dim
SAMMDf
2221 60014m
220060001 F01
MOUOMSF01
220720082R)1
SITI ID
Fornbint St. 1 North
Boiton M
Un1»«n1tjr of
Miuduiotti
II ftilborrjr St.
Alrpgrt
em/eoutrr
SprlngftoU
Miont
Niihiii/
Nlllibourgn
brdnor
STATE
m
M
M
M
SITE
TYPE
MIC
SUV6
SLM6
STATIOI TYPE
lidurtan/
cojwclil
CMUr city/
AVAILAS.
DATA
80-81
78-79
1978
1979
PROM
HT. (•
1.6
1.1
DISTANCE
FKM CC
fim!
8
11
118
70
DISTAKC
fiat no
(ml
17
TMfFIC
ACT
1000
OTHER:
MM diu BllKM (t <11 IHII.M. ini xid a.
i fro*
u
m>1ng holtfit dm fr.
.UMd fornHllDg.
-------
Non-attainment area Springfield. MA
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used:
Citv-Soecific EKMA
Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/Kou if Yes, date
Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS NO
1/29/82
Final Modeling Completed? Yes/Ma; if Yes, date
Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
unknown
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/Not; if Yes, date
unknown
Site-Days
Modeled
NMOC/NOX
Ratio(s)
Amherst, MA 0220060001F01
6/12/78
7/14/79
6/28/79
6/11/78
Nashua, NH
7/21/78
8/16/78
7*
7*
7*
7*
#300480005F01
7*
7*
Gardner, MA 0220720002F01
7/21/79 7*
7/10/79 7*
Transported
Os Concen-
tration(ppm)
0.099
0.141
0.06
0.11
0.103
0.06
0.06
0.084
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.155
0.152
0.135
0.125
0.150
0.140
0.138
0.127
Calculated
% HC Control
36.5
35.0
23.6
0
34.5
25.2
18.5
4.1
^Seasonal median 6-9 a.m.
35
;**
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS _
o Remarks: **$ince both Boston and Springfield contributed to standard exceedances
at the Nashua. NH monitor, this % HC control would ensure that at least one of
these urban areas (Springfield) would not contribute any exceedances while the
other, (Boston) would be allowed one per year.
-------
CITY: Hartford
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(s): Connecticut
REGION:
COUNTIES: Hartford area only (a)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC. NO, BASE YEAR: 1980
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE: A/15/82
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION: 807.766 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHICHWAY 7/20/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82 836.652 (1987)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
108.282
Point
(20Z)
90,376
Area
(32Z)
58.549
Highway
(48Z)
^
\
\
V \
\ \
\ \
\
\
\
\
\
74.582
/
56.492
Area
(41Z)
30.305
Highway
(35Z)
Point
(24Z)
A
xv
-.^
^
X
(322).
Base Baseline SI
Year Projection I
1980 1987
v 64,030
•H
47.328
•
Area
(42Z)
20.408
^Highway
LP Strategy
•rejection
1987 (b)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
88,796
Point
(23Z)
68.732
62, 10?"
Highway
(70Z>
v
x 76.565 76,565
\>
Area
(7Z>
Point.
57.229
^r-
50,010
Highway
(65Z)
X25Z).
_
Area
(9Z)
Point
57,229
— >•
50,010
Highway
(65Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1987 1987
Inventory
Pollutants
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(c)
VOC NO, VOC NO, VOC NO, VOC NO,
Point Sources 23.5 24.8
Nonhighvay Area 39.0 8.2
Highway 57.6 76.9
TOTAL
120.1
109.9
21.6
36.2
31.3
89.1
23.1
8.6
59.8
91.5
20.0
32.2
24.5
76.5
23.1
8.6
59.8
91.5
- 7
-15
-65
-41
0
+ 4
-36
-19
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 12 NO, 7_
COMMENTS: (a) For Hartford County only. Inventory area does not correspond with modeling areas.
(b) 1987 SIP strategy inventory for New Haven estimated fron statewide totals. Controls included
in SIP are RACT I. II. I/M. TCMs. and RACT on all 100* TPY sources (including RACT III).
(c) Calculated percent change is for total emissions, not normal1ted emissions per capita.
-------
Non-attainment area Hartford. CT
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
Base Years: 1975. 1976 & 1977 (expected effect of 1978. 1979 & 1980 data
on control strategy to be summarized in final SIP; no plans to consider
1981 data.)
Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/MB; However, State has not presented summary of data for recent three
years nor assessed effect on control strategy in SIP. The only NMOC data
available, gathered in 1981. is known to be unreliable.
Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/NS. If No, what is missing?
Accepted by EPA? Yes/NB; if Yes, date 1/18/83
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
•M-MUIn
POLUITMT
Ozona
Oxona
Ozona
Oxona
Oxona
Oxona
Ozona
Oxona
Ozona
SAROAD I
070060 12V01
07017SI2XFOI
070190127/01
OTOnOOMfOl
070350123m
OTOtOOOOlFOl
07022001V01
070S7M07F01
07070Q123F01
SITE 10
Hollar St. A Boron AM.
Conmctlcvt SUta Collaga
Oiborna 1 7**
Carolina ST. Ext.
naar SMlton Indust. lorn
Iruea Calf Couraa.
King St.
Unlmlty of CanBaetlcut
AM^F P0lll€
Naarian Ag. b,. Str,
X Real ng tan
C. Hartford
Coon, (allay Hasp.
Eaitare Or.
714 Stata St.
CITY/COUNTY
Irldgapart/
Falrflald
Dubury/
Falrftald
Oarby/
IkMKmn
Craanilch/
FalrflaM
nan Ham
Naaaan/
na»HaM*
Hart ford/
Hertford
NlddlOCBM/
Nlddlatai
Ma* HaMii/
(km Ham
STATE
a
CT
CT
CT
a
a
CT
CT
CT
SITE
TYPE
STATIC* TYPE
cantar city/
raildantlal
Suburban/
rastoanttal
cantar city/
coaarctal
rural/
wfcvrDw/
mtdanttal
rural/
•gn cultural
Mdwrban/
mtdantlal
rural/
mqwallflad
cantar city/
raildantlal
AVAILABLE
DATA
75-77
75-77
76-77
75-77
7S-77
75-77
75-77
75-77
75-77
PROBE
MT. (•)
i
4.5
14
i.a
*
4.5
4
5.S
7.5
DISTANCE
FROM CC
(tir)
HA-
HA'
M*
MA>
HA-
HA*
«•
KA-
MA-
DISTANCE
FROH DO.
tut
TRAFFIC
ADT
Mud data callacUd at Bridlay. Sltunfcy (CT) ma Cantral Par* (NT) », »S u»od In irajac-.ory inf.yiii u> ulttt ponlbla oodallng u/t.
y|na «"•• 0"" BBiiibl. noaallm di»i wtn laleciao. net u>H in lUruare EOlA ao4tl1n».
Klilnt halgnt data not ntnnd for «tand«rd EO» Hanea. i.«iliolt r^lonil data not ,^4 for
-------
Non-attainment area Hartford, CT
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: Standard EKMA (applied statewide)
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/M; if Yes, date 1/29/82 Using pre-79
data base, (same as 79 SIP analysis)
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes, previously OAQPS Yes, previously in 79 SIP review.
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/Nfl; 1f Yes, date unknown
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes* OAQPS Yes*
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/Ma; if Yes, date unknown
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOX 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio(s) tration(ppm) (ppm) % HC Control
Groton, CT #070350123F01
8/02/75 9.5** 0.050 0.145 55
8/25/75 9.5** 0.060 0.145 55
8/20/76 9.5** 0.065 0.144 54
8/21/76 9.5** 0.095 0.148 48
*> * HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 48***
Remarks: *Still pending is review of recent air quality data on control strategy,
to be discussed in final SIP submittal. **Default value. ***Tentative until
effect of recent air quality data evaluated.
-------
CITY: New Haven
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(E): Connecticut
REGION: I
COUNTIES: New Haven area only (Fairfield County Is added to Hew York City AQCR) (a)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC. NO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFT ICE:
BASE YEAR:
4/15/82
1980
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NOHHIGHWAY 7/20/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
POPULATION; 761.337 (1980)
776.128 (1987)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
Point
(23Z)
100. 954 /
f
75,549
Area
(29Z)
48,772
Highway
(48Z)
^
\
\
^ \
\
\
\
V
\
\
\
(32Z),
70.264
It
(30Z)
49.044
Area
(38Z)
22.167
Highway
Point
A
-«.^\
^»
^
(28ZX
, 61.405
(32Z)
41.503
Area
(40Z)
17.267
Highway
Base
Year
1980
Inventory.
Pollutants
Baseline
Projection
1987
SIP Strategy
Projection
1987 (b)
115.953
Point
(44Z)
64,319
•*-^
58,908
Highway
(51Z)
\
\
V
^Area
(5Z),
99.815 99.815
Point
(51Z)
48,642
43,129
Highway
(43Z)
Area
(6Z)
Point
(51Z)
48.642
43,129
Highway
(43Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1987 1987
VOC
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/eap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(c)
NO,
NO.
VOC
HO,
VOC
NO,
VOC
Point Sources 30.7 67.8
Nonhighway Area 37.8 7.1
Highway 64.1 77.4
27.3
34.6
28.6
65.9
7.1
55.6
25.6
31.2
22.3
65.9
7.1
55.6
-15
-16
-65
- 1
+ 2
-27
TOTAL 132.6 152.3
90.5
128.6
79.1
128.6
-39
-14
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 18 NO* 8_
COMMENTS: (a) For New Haven County only. Inventory area does not correspond with modeling areas.
(b) 1987 SIP strategy inventory for New Haven estimated from statewide totals. Controls included
in SIP are RACT I. II. I/M. TCMs. and RACT on all 100+ TPY sources (including RACT III).
(c) Calculated percent change is for total emissions, not normalized emissions per capita.
-------
Non-attainment area New Haven/Bridgeport. CT
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1975. 1976 & 1977 (expected effect of 1978. 1979 & 1980 data
on control strategy to be summarized in final SIP; no plans to consider
1981 data.)
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/HB; However. State has not presented summary of data for recent three
"nor assessed effect on control strategy in SIP. The only NMOC data
year
aval
13 IIW I Q J O w ••J «swj«i ^ • i ww w **** *•**• '^L!_?g_^_^_^_L_^_^^J^—-•^^••^••^•••^•^
ilable. gathered in 1981. is known to be unreliable.
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/Mtt.
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/HB; if Yes, date .
If No, What Is missing?
1/18/83
Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
PQLLUTMT!
Ozont
Onmt
OnM
Oan
OtOM
Onno
OtOM
OHM
Onn
SUOAO 1
070M01ZW01
0701751Z1FOI
OTOIMUVOI
aTOUOOMTOl
07USOU3FOI
oTBwmurai
tTOBcturai
070S70WTF01
SITE U
Hollor St. 1 tanm Aw.
Cwmctteiit Suu Coll*9t
OiMrao 1 70i
Cirallno ST. Ut.
our Shtltoi InAnt. lent
Brvco Self Couru,
Mn> St.
UaKinlty of Comoctloit
Anry Point
Htadn A). EID. SH.
30 RtBlnBton
t. Hartford
COM. Vtllty Mo.
CuumOr.
71S suti St.
cin/counr
trldtoport/
Filrflold
OMbury/
Fitrflold
HocHwon
fimmtcli/
Ftlrflotd
(man/
•w HMD
kUdn/
ta> Him
HtrtforoV
HlddUtom/
•tjiHMtn/
NOM MlMfl
STATE
CT
a
CT
CT
CT
a
a
a
Cl
TtK
-
STATIM nn.
CMUr city/
rtildtntlil
uburUn/
mlomtlil
enter city/
conorcti)
rurit/
noor uibtn
wsurbin/
rMldMtiOl
nnl/
4»r1 cultural
WbCTMB/
mMMtul
rural/
wqiwllflid
entor city/
midnttil
PAT*
75-77
TS-77
7S-77
75-77
7J-J7
7S-77
71-77
T5-n
7S-77
XT. («)
»
4.S
14
l.t
•
4.S
4
5.6
7.S
FIUM CC
«•
HA-
HA*
M«
HA'
HA*
»•
«•
M*
MM W
urr
• Wt «ppllciBlB SUtntdi
BTM«:
Wad ditt collWMd it «r»dlty. SUanlj (CT) ind Ctntnl Pitt (>T| by HIS in«< 1o trptctery Mulyili to ultct poiilblt ood^lliii il*)fl.
Ljo»»1»)t «eaollna diyi «»n Mltctod. not una In itmdord i«A BMfltDg.
u»d for oootlIng.
Wad dita.
MHPI
not moid for ittMird COM Hma. lulltblt m
-------
Non-attainment area New Haven/Bridgeport. CT
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: Standard EKMA (applied statewide)
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes^fe; if Yes, date 1/29/82 Using pre-79
data base, (same as 79 SIP analysis;
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes, previously OAQPS Yes, previously in 79 SIP review
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/Bfl; 1f Yes, date unknown
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes* OAQPS Yes*
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/MX; if Yes, date unknown
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOX 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio(s) trationfppm) (ppm) % HC Control
8/02/75 9.5** 0.050 0.145 55
8/25/76 9.5** 0.060 0.145 55
8/20/76 9.5** 0.065 0.144 54
8/21/76 9.5** 0.095 0.148 48
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 48***
o Remarks: *Still pending is review of recent air quality data on control strategy
to be discussed in final SIP subim'ttal. **Default value. ***Tentative until
effect of recent air quality data evaluated.
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Providence
STATE(s):
Rhode Island
REGION:
COUNTIES: Rhode Island - Providence, Kent. Washington, Bristol and Newport
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Honhighway - Rhode Island Division of Air and Hazardous Materials,
Department of Environmental Management; Highway - Rhode Island Department of State Planning
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC. SO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR: 1980
3/82 '
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1982
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: HOHHICHWAY 6/17/80 BICHWAY 7/23/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
168,817
Point
(24Z)
127.875
Area
(24Z)
87.995
Highway
(52Z)
x
x 149.111 149.111
X
x
X
X
X
Point
(27Z)
109,260
Area
(25Z)
72,530
Highway
(48Z)
Point
(27Z)
109.260
Area
(25Z)
72.530
Highway
(48Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1982 1982 (b)
POPULATION: 947.154 (1980)
_ 953.000 (1982)(a)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
Point
(18Z)
/ Pol
(l 05. 227
»
86.468
V.
76.968
Highway
(73Z)
^^_ 97,559
**-»
^V
Area
(9Z)
80,860
«-
71,300
Highway
(73Z)
nt (17Z)
97.559
L_yC~
V
Area
(10Z)
Base Baseline
Year Projection
1980 1982
^
80,800
*•
71.300
Highway
(73Z)
SIP Strategy
Projection
1982
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Point Sources
Nonhighway Area
Highway
TOTAL
Base
VOC
43.3
42.1
92.9
178.3
Year
NO,
19.8
10.0
81.3
111.1
Baseline
VOC
41.8
38.6
76.1
156.5
Projection
NO,
17.6
10.0
74.8
102.4
SIP Projection
VOC NO,
41.8 17.6
38.6 10.0
76.1 74.8
156.5 102.4
Total Z 1
VOC
- 3
- 8
-18
-12
Change (i
NO,
-10
0
- 7
- 7
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 26 NO, (d)
COMMENTS: (a) No 1982 population for Rhode Island. Estimated by back calculation fron consumer
/commercial solvent emissions, (b) Controls in SIP include RACT I. II and I/M. While I/M is
included in calculation of totals. Rhode Island claims that I/M is not part of their SIP since
an extension to 1987 is no longer requested (but will maintain program), (e) Calculated percent
change for total emissions, cot emissions per capita, (d) Ho listing of major NO, sources.
-------
Non-attainment area
Providence, R!
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979, 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/Kg
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? XEK/No; If No, what is missing? NOx data
characterized as "spotty" in draft SIP. Used in SIP analysis but not
entered in SAROAD.
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/HS; 1f Yes, date
11/28/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
Ron-AtUlaBiit Am
Pravltum. II
POLLUTANT
MOC/HOi
Oiom
OZOM
Omit
tent
team
OZOM
Hunt
SACMD 1
41UD0018FOS
41010001801
4I0140002F01
41030M11FOI
Z2I8800UF01
Z20US001F01
BUlaOOlFOl
281960I1F01
sm ID
uaa OMenutary
tockfill.r Library
V. Altai Joan C**n»
Httltn Omramt
SUM St. Trailer
Fen liter trldge
Pott Office
300 Mia Strict
Nedfteld SUtt HBIplUl
Mttr tm Rd - CiMt
midttn tut. mi«iif«
em/eoucn
Pnxianci/
Pmldmt
ProvlOMiu/
Pn»1«na
Int Counqr
Prmldnci/
PimldiMi
Qnliiqr
Mm Entan
IMfltld
Sutwry
STATt
M
>I
III
n
M
W
M
M
SIU
TtPt
RM6
SLMB
IMS
SLW6
STATin TTK
cmur cltj/
ctnter city/
rasldmtlil
run}/
unqualified
enter cltr/
caBerclil
rural/
BMT UFOWI
nml/
COMTtlll
rwel/
OUBTCUl
rural/
*ar1cultura1
AVAILABLE
DATA
1981
»-81
»41
19»
79-80
SB41
7941
I9B9
NT. (!)
2.S
1.1
4.1
1.3
4.1
FROM CC
CC
CC
CC
II
16
41
S»
FROM DO
10
80
HOT
4000
8000
•
OTHPI:
Ml«d diu collected it Altai Jenn depin. U HMltH UP.. Oyer Strut eauterlm iiu. ind green Alrpert (HB)
HIM «*U fm Alton Jonei C»BMI». tnd Green »1rport —•
•ling.
NUIng kelont diu fro* »P-IOI cllmtalogml ina mpeoile er Mi ten EPA lumtitg atu («t»n t»illialel Hied fer epdellng.
-------
Non-attainment area Providence, RI
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/MS; if Yes, date 3/82
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS No
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/N&; 1f Yes, date Unknown
- Revi ewed by: RO (s) - Yes OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/N&; if Yes, date Unknown
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOX 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio(s) tration(ppm) (ppm) % HC Control
Quincy, MA #221880002F01
7/14/79 4.5* 0.103 0.138 16
Medfield, MA #221210001F01
8/05/80 4.5* 0.091 0.159 30
7/15/80 4.5* 0.110 0.135 12
7/25/79 4.5* 0.113 0.132 0
Nortn Easton, MA #220535001F01
7/17/80 4.5* 0.072(or 0.094?) 0.150 27
7/16/80 4.5* 0.119 0.127 0
*Value used for all modeling days.
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS ]£
Remarks: **Fourth highest control value selected from all the six site-davs
modeled.
-------
2.2 Region II
New York, NY/NJ/CT
O)
ec
OL
to
->
JD
10
I/I
O
1C
.0
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: New York
STATE(s): New York. New Jersey, Connecticut
REGION: II
COUNTIES; NJ - Bergen, Essex, Hudson. Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris. Passaic. Somerset. Union;
NY - Suffolk, dockland, Westchester, Nassau, Manhattan, Kings, Queens, Bronx, Richmond;
CT - Falrfield.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: NY City PEP (all sources in city). TRI-State RPC (Highway. NY) NYSDEC
(Nonhighway, NY); NJDEP (Honhighway. NJ). NJDOT (Highway. NJ); CTDEP (all sources. CT)
EMISSION IHVENTC
9AXA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED; VOC. 80, BASE TEAR: 1980
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE: BY. HI; 1/82; CT; 4/82
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: (a)
POPULATION: 16.668.193 (1980)
17.010.978 (1987)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONBIGHWAY NY:2/11; HI:2/24; HIGHWAY 7/23/82
CT;7/20/82
NITROGEN OXIDES
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
leg/day
2.127.009
Point
(17Z)
1.737.859
Area
(43Z)
858.425
Highway
(40Z)
t
\
\
\
^ \
\ \
\ v
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
Poin,
(16Z)\
/ (U
1.361.582/ \
<-/
1.137.415
Area
(59Z)
338.583
Highway
(2SZ)
"-,
Base Baseline SI
Year Projection I
1980 1987
>Z)
U. 231. 946
W
1.016,029
Area
(58Z)
296,626
Highway
(24Z)
[P Strategy
•rejection
1987 (b)
kg/day
1,780.223
Point
(33Z)
1.192.894
Area
(21Z)
813.515
Highway
(46Z)
Baae
Year
1980
V
X
X
s
X
X
1
1.677.12C
Point
(41Z)
981.143
Area
(23Z)
599.599
Highway
(36Z)
Baseline
•rojectloi
1987
SI
i 1
1.677.126
Point
(41Z)
981.143
Area
(23Z)
599.599
Highway
(36Z)
[P Strategy
Rejection
1987
Inventory
Pollutants
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(c)
VOC NO, VOC NO. VOC NO, VOC NO,
Point Sources 21.5 35.3
Nonhlghway Area 54.6 22.8
Highway 51.5 48.8
13.2
47.0
19.9
40.9
22.4
35.2
12.7
42.3
17.4
40.9
22.4
35.2
-40
-21
-65
+18
- 1
-26
TOTAL
127.6
106.8
80.1
98.5
72.4
98.5
-42
- 5
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 119 NO, 112
COMMENTS: (a) Attainment not demonstrated by 1987. (b) 1987 SIP strategy inventory estimated
for Fairfleld Co. CT. Controls included in SIPs are BACT I. II. I/M. TCM's and for NJ and CT
RACT on additional VOC sources above and below 100 TPY cutoff. SIP strategy inventory does not
include extraordinary control measures for NJ. (e) Calculated percent change ia for total
emissions, not emissions per capita.
-------
Non-attainment area New York City, NY/NJ/CT
AIK- QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979. 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/MS
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? fffefe/No. If No, what is missing? Sandy Hook
is not in SAROAD; NO has delayed sending 1981 data from SLAMS (Dumont)
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/N8. if Yes, date
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
Ml-AtUtnoent Art*
rouinnr:
IMC
WOC
NO*
KU
wnc/Mi
MK/MI
MK/NOi
MK
Mi
0»no
Ozm
OIOM
(dm
dm
Oiono
OUM
On.
Hunt
OUM
tarn
SAHIAD 1
1346800B4 US
134680085 MS
134680070 FOl
134680076 FOl
312580002 US
312580002 JOS
313500002 FOl
310180003 FOl
113480004 US
313460008 FOl
070190123 Wl
070420123 FOl
070330004 FOl
070220003 FOt
070700123 FOl
07047BOOIFOI
070570007 FOT
071110007 FOl
330280002 FOl
NOT In SAROAD
111120001 FOl
SITE 10
Sulnwy P.O.
Aitorit Qutm
ProipKt P«rk
Brooklyn
Hooluy P.O.
Alton* Queens
n 121
Brooklyn
Itadtn
Nn Brunswick
Btyom
U Intltuu of Ttctnologjr
HMM*
M,
Kirtferd
tratmlch Bruco Golf
Count
bit wrtford
*,m~
rtrrls Sm
Hlddlttoun
Stratford tatat
Bat/It*
Sindy Hook
Dmt
cm/counTY
he* York City/
OuMfll CO
k*» Tort City/
Kings Co
HTC/Quttns
me/King* Co
Llndtn/Uolon Co.
hn> Orumtck/
Mddltsw Co
loyonnt/
Hudson Co
Ktnrk/
Eisa Co
•Mit/Eiia Co
Otroy/
IkmMtvon Co
Nirtford/
Hirtford Co
tnomricli/
Filrfltld Ca
E. Hirtford/
Hirtford Co
HwHtmi/
•tnHmn. Co
Lltekflold Co
Mddlotow/
Ftlrfltld Co
B*bylo»
Suffolk Co
Hlddlaa Co
°TSSt»Cfl
STATE
HI
KY
BY
MY
HJ
N
HI
RJ
•I
CT
CT
CT
a
n
CT
CT
n
MT
M
w
SITE
TYPE
surs
SIMS
SUK
MK
SLAB
SUK
SUK
MK
MK
SUK
MK
MK
SUK
SUK
SUK
STATIOR TYPE
city conttr
mldtntltl
city ctnur/
midtntUI
uourbin/
Indus trl»l
suburOiV
ratdontlil
city conttr/
city ctnttr/
mldtnlil
cltjr eenttr/
COMTCUI
city conttr/
rural/nttr
urbsn
suburbia/
rtildtntltl
city ctntnl/
rnldtntKI
nmo
rani/
•nquiMrM
suburbn/
mldontlol
suturbtn/
Induitrlil
uburbm/
mldontlil
DATA
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
BO
ID
7B-80
78-W
7»-«l
Bl
7W,
78-80
80-61
BO-B1
78^1
71.81
HT. (.)
1
3
6
12
S
4
5
21
4
1
2
5
4
2
IB
10
S
s
FROM CC
.10
.10
.10
.10
25
45
«10
is
is
90
150
45
150
105
120
14S
90
60
30
25
FROMRD.
30
46
420
50
12
225
75
30
IDT
BOOO
10.00)
20.000
2000
9900
50.000
900
1900
BTHtH-.
««« uu allotted ot
8ttoi «nd it locll t1r»»rt«
MM (UU fro. Jteart. Ph11«dol»Mo md Hirtford ms Offlcot
Nixing htlgot dtu frost Fort To tun. Ht (RTCI «Hi SOMOdlnti
.nod for i
_ utd for i
tllog.
' utd rcr tootling..
*Since EPA Region II was closely involved in verifying data used for nr
1t did not plan to formally advise States on data acceptance.
-------
Non-attainment area New York City. NY/NJ/CT
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/*l&; if Yes, date 7/15/81 report date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/US; 1f Yes, date 3/15/82 transmittal date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/Eft; 1f Yes, date unknown
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOX 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio(s) tration(ppm) (ppm) % HC Control
Stratford Point, CT #071110007F01
7/20/80 9.6** 0.122 0.272 ***
7/21/80* 9.6** 0.125 0.303 64
6/24/80* 9.6** 0.102 0.253 60
Middletown, CT #070570007F01
7/21/80 9.6** 0.125 0.262 ***
7/16/80* 9.6** 0.100 0.262 63
6/24/80* 9.6** 0.102 0.234 58
New Haven, CT #070700123F01
7/21/80 9.6** 0.125 0.235 ***
7/20/80 9.6** 0.122 0.226 ***
7/16/80 9.6** 0.100 0.291 ***
7/22/80* 9.6** 0.089 0.227 60
o * HC Control - Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 60
Remarks: *These site/days were modeled using the City-Specific EKMA Appendix B
procedures which account for precursor transport. **Mean median of daily 6-9
a.m. ratios for six sites in 1980 excluding weekend days. ***Not modeled with
Appendix B, but preliminary screening indicated that these days would yield
higher % control value(s), for each particular site, if Appendix B were used.
****New Jersey has accepted the 60% VOC control value. New York has rejected
the 60% value on grounds that the Stratford Point site is unrepresentative. New
York has selected a 58% control value. The Region contends that the site is
representative and that 60% is the appropriate value.
-------
2.3 Region III
Allentown, PA
Baltimore, MD
Pittsburgh, PA
Philadelphia, PA/NJ/DE
Washington, DC
Ol
oo
c.
O)
C"
O
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Allentown STATE(s):
COUNTIES: Lehigh, Northampton
Pennsylvania
REGION: III
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources - Honhighway
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation - Highway
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC. HO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR: 1980
7/82
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR:
1987
POPULATION: 497.500 (1980) (a)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHICHWAY 10/6/82 HIGHWAY 11/1/82 516.800 (1987) (a)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
Point
(26Z)
/
Point
(21Z)
/ Area A
/ (33Z) /
(59.491
43.852 J
"-»
24,126 "^
Highway p-
(41Z)
Base
Year
1980
/
x 38. 240 fc
^^ 27, 344 •
" Area ^
-^ 10,462
Highway "
Baseline
<44Z)
T27Z7<
. 38.240
v 27,344
^ Area
10,462
Highway
P Strategy
Projection Projection
1987
1987 (b)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
184,002 173.632
Point
(75Z)
46.109
40.364*
Highway
(22Z)
Area
(3D
JL
.. -
*h
Point
(80Z)
36.488
30.273 •
Highway
(17Z)
Area
<3Z)
4-j
173.632
Point
(80Z)
36,488
• 30,273
Highway
(17Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1987 1987
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Point Sources
Nonhlghway Area
Highway
TOTAL
Base
VOC
31
39
48
119
.4
.7
.5
.6
Year
NO,
277.2
11.5
81.1
369.8
Baseline
VOC
21.1
32.6
20.2
73.9
Projection
NO,
277.0
12.0
58.6
347.6
SIP
VOC
21.1
32.6
20.2
73.9
Projection
NO,
277.0
12.0
58.6
347.6
Total Z (
VOC
-30
-14
-57
-36
Change (i
NO,
+ 4
+ 8
-25
- 2
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 14 NO, 13
COMMENTS: (a) Population data net directly available at publication. Population estimated by
back calculation from consumer/commercial solvent use, (b) Includes effects of I/M program.
Controls Included In SIP are RACT I, II (expect Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaners), I/M, and
TCMs. (c) Calculated percent change for total emissions, not normalized emissions per capita.
-------
Non-attainment area Allentown, PA _
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base • Status
- Base Years: 1979. 1980 & 1981 _
• Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency (ies)?
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? YesflKX. If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/Ntt; 1f Yes, date
11/23/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
POLLUTWIT
dim/
NMOC/KO.
Oiom/
MX/MI
Oiont
OIOM
SUOAO I
N0120M3F01
39078001 7F 01
MZR0100F01
Mwoootfos
sin ID
JiOS 1 FwntCt SU.
Cut Hirttt 1 MM StJ.
CM! 1 Hilton Sti.
btlUMi SUU Colltt*
trli SC1MU 514(.
ciTi/aum
Allcntam/
Lctalgli
tethllhn/
iierthcvtm
Eiiun/
Nortluwtm
ItttltOMt/
Birki
n*n
PA
M
p»
M
SITE
n«
«M6
HAffi
1MB
SiniM TYPE
luturtMfl/
mldntUl
mtvrMn/
IMutml
irixirtun/
mtontltl
ni»1/
unqullfltd
«MIIMU
OAT*
19-81
n-n
•0-81
io-ai
HtOBE
HI. <•
2
4
4
DISTANCE
FROM CC
Ikn)
DISTANCE
FROM RP
lull
18
SO
10
1MFFIC
UT
SO
2000
SO
OTHK'
MM
-------
Non-attainment area Allentown, PA
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/No; if Yes, date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) OAQPS
unknown
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/Eft; 1f Yes, date 6/25/82
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/MX; if Yes, date
6/25/82
Site-Days
Modeled
Allentown, PA
6/01/79
5/09/79
6/15/79
9/04/80
6/19/80
6/08/79
8/27/80
Bethlehem. PA
6/01/79
6/19/80
5/11/79
6/15/79
7/15/80
5/31/80
9/04/80
NMOC/NOv
Ratio(s)
#390120003F01
Transported
0s Concen-
tration(ppm)
7.0
#390780017F01
,114
.070
.087
.068
0.087
0.104
0.132
0.
0.
0.
0.
7.0
Easton. PA #392720100F01
9/04/80
9/13/80
9/20/80
8/25/80
7.0
0.114
0.087
0.132
0.087
0.121
0.068
0.068
0.068
0.089
0.057
0.078
- continued on next page -
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.162
0.173
0.172
0.145
0.142
0.136
0.137
0.228
0.155
0.157
0.154
0.152
0.148
0.151
0.153
0.149
0.126
0.126
Calculated
% HC Control
40,
39,
35,
20.0
18.5
9.8
0
53.8
32.2
30.0
27.5
26.
25.
.2
,5
21.4
21.7
19.7
6.5
0
27.5
o Remarks:
-------
Kultztown, PA #394620001 FOB
6/30/81 7.0 0.077 0.147 24.1
7/10/80 7.0 0.090 0.143 24.1
9/09/80 7.0 C.044 0.148 22.5
7/24/81 7.0 0.062 0.144 21.7
7/Z6/80 7.0 0.080 0.137 20.7
8/29/BO 7.0 0.039 0.146 16.7
7/19/80 7.0 0.080 0.137 14.0
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Baltimore
STATE(s):
Maryland
REGION: III
COUNTIES: Anne Arundel. Baltimore. Carroll. Harford. and Howard
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Maryland Air Management Administration - Point
Balrlaote Regional Planning Council - Highway
EMISSION INVENTORY 3ATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: RVOC. HO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
Oj ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION: 2.174.023 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHICHWAY 2/23/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82 2.254.000 (1987)(a)
BASE YEAR: 1980
12/81
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
318.839
Point
(392)
194,057
Area
(182)
135.900
Highway
(432)
Base
Year
1980
k
\
\
\
\
\
^ \
\
\
^ \
\ >J
\
\
\
^
I
177,764
Point
(402)
107,792
Area
(332)
48,611
Highway
(272)
Baseline
>rojeetior
1987
Hi*
SI
i I
160,000
Point
(372)
104,000
Area
(362)
45.000
Highway
(272)
IP Stratej
•rojectioi
1987 (1
17
i
>)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
307.757 311.247 311,247
Point
(472)
165.437
Area _
124,400^
Highway
(402)
(132)
X
V
X
X
Point
(572)
134,231
Area *
94,400
Highway
(302)
(132)
•^N,
fc ^.
Point
(572)
134,231
k. Area
94.400
Highway
(302)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1987 1987
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/eap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Point Sources
Nonhighway Area
Highway
TOTAL
Base Year
VOC
57.5
26.8
62.6
146.9
NO,
66.5
18.9
57.3
142.7
Baseline
VOC
31.1
26.3
21.6
79.0
Projection
NO,
78.6
17.7
42.0
138.3
SIP Projection Total 2 Change (i
VOC
27.5
26.2
20.0
73.7
NO,
78.6
17.7
42.0
138.3
VOC
-68
+ I
-67
-48
NO,
+23
- 3
-24
- 0
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 37 NO* 24 (d)
COMMENTS: (a) 1987 population estimated by interpolation of 1985 and 1990 figures, (b) Emis-
sion goal with a 9,000 kg/day VOC reduction necessary to be achieved with additional RACT.
Controls in SIP include RACT I. II. I/M. TCM's. and RACT on all 100 TPY sources (including RACT
III), (e) Calculated percent change for total emissions, not normalised emissions per capita.
(d) Number of major NO. facilities not included. Number of HO, sources from NECRMP study data.
-------
Non-attainment area Baltimore, MD
AIR- QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979. 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/K&
- Are all data entered 1n SAROAD? Yes/Hfl. If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/IMC; 1f Yes, date
3/30/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
«Ofl-Attlll
Bjltlmon
POLLUTANT
Ozone/
woe
OtOM
Oient/
mOC/NOi
Ozm
Ozont
Dim
Dim
HOC/Mi
NNDC/NOi
•EDI Am
1. MO
SAROAD I
2I00800IKOS
211160002C01
210680001(01
210&00007GOI
2IOI40D10G01
2109200BOJ05
21HS0001FOI
210UOOOW01
2101200 1BF01
SITI 10
FT. NMdt
Elmnurr scnoel
Jenklm Raid
UoodMrt t Donty «dt.
Gnmtdi Drive
Gmmfer Hlllurjr
taurutlM
321} CopftMw M *
IB 2
EdgMOd Hag Ctntir
ZOO RudSt
Cllnrtt t 221)4 St.
CITVOMITT
Am* »nm»l Co.
Rlvlen Beich/
-------
Non-attainment area Baltimore. MD
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/flfa; if Yes, date unknown
Reviewed by: R0(s) No OAQPS No
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/IMC; 1f Yes, date 7/01/82
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes C8/06/82)
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/IKX; if Yes, date 7/01/82
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOv 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio(s) tration(ppm) (ppm) % HC Control
Ft. Meade, MD #210080019605
8/05/80 8.26* 0.042 0.176 53.0
7/17/80 8.26* 0.049 0.183 49.3
Riviera Beach, MD #211360002601
8/04/80 8,26* 0.056 0.198 49.0
Essex, MD #210680001601
7/19/80 8.26* 0.055 0.171 46.5
8/26/80 8.26* 0.043 0.167 31.9
Cockeysville, MD #210500007601
8/07/80 8.26* 0.062 0.167 48.0
8/11/80 8.26* 0.038 0.183 46.2
• continued on next page -
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS
o Remarks: *median ratio
-------
Edgewood, MD #210650001F01
7/31/80 8.26* 0.070 0.162 49.3
Baltimore Co., MD #210140010601
8/05/80 8.26* 0.042 0.195 56.0
8/27/80 8.26* 0.072 0.177 46.6
Bel Air, MD #210920080005
7/21/80 8.26* 0.050 0.179 44.9
-------
CITY: Pittsburgh
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(s): Pennsylvania
REGION: III
COUNTIES: Allegheny. Armstrong. Bearer, Butler. Washington, Westmoreland
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Allegheny County Bureau of Air Pollution Control, PA Department of
Environmental Resources - Nonhighway; Southwest Pennsylvania Air Pollution Control - Highway
EMISSION INVENTORY PATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC, HO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE TEAR: 1980
2/82
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION: 2.489.574 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHICHWAY 3/25/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82 2.481.561 (1987)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
Point
C19Z)
Point
(26Z)
,371.477
309,974
Area
(29Z)
193.084
1 Highway
1 (52Z)
Base
Year
1980
V
. \
V
\
N \,
N
1
219.860
^
162,317
7^837'
Highway
(35Z
Baseline
>rojectior
1987 (e
/
1
•(39Z)-
S]
i I
0
219.860
162.317
Area
Highway
(35Z)
LP Strategy
"rejection
1987 (a)
700,590
Point
<63Z)
225.176
225,159
Highway
<32Z)
s.
Xx 655, 969 655,969
Area
<5Z)
^
•^
Point
(67Z)
215,448
«v
180,655
Highway
(28Z)
Area
<5Z)
A
Point
(67Z)
215.448
\
180.655
Highway
(28Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1987 1987
Inventory
Pollutants
VOC
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(b)
VOC
NO*
VOC
NO,
VOC
NO,
NO,
Point Sources 28.3 177.3 23.2 177.5 23.2 177.5 -18 0
Nonhighway Area 43.3 13.7 34.4 14.0 34.4 14.0 -21 + 2
Highway 77.6 90.4 31.0 72.8 31.0 72.8 -60 -20
TOTAL
149.2
281.4
88.6
264.3
88.6
264.3
-41
- 6
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 54_ NO* 46
COMMENTS; (a) Includes I/M credits. Controls in SIP include RACT I. II (except Perchloroethylene
Dry Cleaners) and I/M. (b) Calculated percent change is for total emissions, not normalized
emissions per capita.
-------
Non-attainment area Pittsburgh, PA
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979. 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/Mft
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/Dfl. If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/HS; if Yes, date
11/23/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
•wAtulnml in*
PtttlOurgn. PA
POLLUTANT
QlOM
Onm/NOl
Oim/Mii
OlOM
iMC/NOi
•Oi
HOC
MK/ttti
SUOUI
39094000)0)1
3MUOI01FOI
3t7260008G01
M01C008B601
3M10008UOS
MOI0006JJOS
M0440004F01
190MOOMFOI
B7HOOIUOS
sm u
Sncttnrttfgt Htur Mrti
L09MI firry taH
101 Mta siratt
eidg. »7
Italic ID)I Bids.
1»4S FruUtam Rotd
Clilc tenter Avdlterlia
MIIIlM 0. acne* Pirk
US (S 1 Holm An.
Eight St 1 »1»«r Alley
ToMDhlp HlgB School
SouUl (iy*tU
cirr/raomr
Bricunrtogl/
A1I«««W>
Nn Unlngun/
Mitioriltnd
lMr«nctvlll
-------
Non-attainment area Pittsburgh. PA
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/Hfl; if Yes, date 8/81
Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS No.
Final Modeling Completed? Yes/Kg; 1f Yes, date unknown
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes (8/17/82)
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/K«; if Yes, date 6/25/82
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOv 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio(s) tration(ppm) (ppm) % HC Control
New Kensington, PA #396520101F01
7/18/81 7.0* 0.042 0.138 24.2
5/23/81 7.0* 0.075 0.130 11.3
Brackenridge, PA #390940001601
7/14/80 7.0* 0.077 0.154 37.0
7/18/81 7.0* 0.042 0.142 28.2
7/12/81 7.0* 0.069 0.132 13.2
Penn Hills, PA #390100088601
7/04/80 7.0* 0.106 0.177 51.3
7/14/80 7.0* 0.077 0.174 47.0
6/26/80 7.0* 0.083 0.153 42.0
6/30/81 7.0* 0.078 0.141 28.4
8/27/81 7.0* 0.055 0.129 17.0
7/26/80 7.0* 0.077 0.130 5.4
- continued on next page -
HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 36.7
o Remarks: *NMOC/NOx ratio used for modeling is from 1980 summer study i.n Pittsbur
-------
Lawrenceville, PA #397260008601
6/26/80 7.0* 0.083 0.174 55.2
7/21/79 7.0* 0.075 0.170 41.2
9/01/79 7.0* 0.091 0.167 41.1
7/20/79 7.0* 0.035 0.155 36.7
6/22/80 7.0* 0.064 0.146 33,3
8/26/80 7.0* 0.085 0.150 30.4
7/19/79 7.0* 0.031 0.147 29.8
9/03/79 7.0* 0.095 0.162 29.4
7/04/80 7.0* 0.106 0.148 27.6
7/18/81 7.0* 0.042 0.140 25.0
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Philadelphia STATE(s): Pennsylvania/Hew Jersey/Delaware REGION: III
COUNTIES: PA - Bucks. Chester, Delaware. Montgomery. Philadelphia; DE - New Castle;
KJ - Burlington. Canden. Gloucester, Mercer. Salem.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: WIMAPCAO. HJDOT. DVRPC - Highway; Pennsylvania PER. New Jersey PEP.
Delaware DNREC and Philadelphia AMS - Nonhighway
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC. NO,
BASE YEAR: 1980
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: (a)
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE: NJ. DE; 1/82; PA 3/82 POPULATION: 5.615.240 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHIGHWAY NJ.DE;2/23;PA;7/6 HIGHWAY 7/23/82 5.670.676 (1987)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (b)
kg/day
882,750
Point
(38Z)
545,997
Area
(30Z)
284.276
Highway
(32Z)
k
\
\
\
\
\
^
\
\
\
\
X
N
\
535.368
Point
(35Z)
341,889
Area
(43Z)
113.351
Highway
(21Z)
*-^
^^^
^
Base Baseline SI
Year Projection !
1980 1987
521.261
Point
(37Z)
323^967
Area
(43Z)
104.171
Highway
(20Z)
IP Strategy
"rejection
. 1987 (e.d
NITROGEN OXIDES (b)
kg/day
809.044
Point
(45Z)
446.703
Area
(14Z)
334.317
Highway
(41Z)
Base
Year
1980
-.^
*»
i»
!
754.024
Point
(50Z)
377,741
Area
(15Z)
262.423
Highway
(35Z)
Baseline
•rojectioi
1987
SI
i I
754,024
Point
(50Z)
377,741
Area
(15Z)
262,423
Highway
(35Z)
P Strategy
*r ejection
1987 (c)
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Base Year
VOC NO*
Baseline Projection
VOC NO*
SIP Projection Total Z Change(e)
VOC NO* VOC NO*
Point Sources 60.0 64.5
Nonhighway Area 46.6 20.0
Highway 50.6 . 59.5
TOTAL ' 157.2 144.0
34.1
40.3
20.0
94.0
66.4
20.3
46.3
133.0
33.2
38.8
18.4
90.4
66.4
20.3
46.3
133.0
-43 + 4
-13 + 3
-60 -22
-39
- 7
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC _UO NO* 49 (f)
COMMENTS: (a) '87 attainment not demonstrated, (b) Point/area breakdown aasaumed for DE. (c) No
change between baseline and SIP strategy PA 1987 emissions, (d) Controls include RACT I.II
(except for Perch. Dry Cleaners in PA), I/M, TCM's (NJ only) and RACT on all sources including
sources below 100 TPY (NJ only), (e) Calculated percent change for total emissions, not eaisaic
per capita, (f) Umber in Phil. Co. not submitted. NECRMP study data used.
-------
Non-attainment area Phnadniphia. PA.
Trenton, NJ
AIR QUALITY Wilmington, OE
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979. 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
YesflMC
- Are all data entered in SAROAO? Yes/flg. If Mo, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/tfdC; if Yes, date
4/05/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
•on-AtulMnl An*
POUU1WI!
MX/Kb
umc.no*
MX/Mi
torn
OMM
fern
Oun
CUM
Oun>
Omt
Om*
Otom
few
SAMW*
17140019 KOI
jgruooit MO)
397140004 HOI
WOMOU FOl
310720003 F01
310780003 F01
MltMOCZfOl
3.m«o, ro,
J97I400MH01
3MS4COI3 FOl
317140014 Wl
111060001 FOl
JIMOODU FOl
Sl« ID
ZOtn 1 Rtu St.
Srud t Struct III.
1SOI I. ticorine A«.
MB UM.
•JM.IT. .
Ccpii «aa 1 torn It.
Upt M/Clljr
Fmt I (writ Ul.
(. Boltng Urt. A
I. Clttll M.
«.£. itrpgrt
SUM Amtrj
1046 MlKlr H.
*uy K4Ur Pop Stl.
CM-Oumln iu.
u^a nut wiii >t.
16 Cut SUU St.
CITY/CaiKTT
pnn«d4ipM<
rmi«diipi>i«
PMIUllpll14/
»hllU4lpkte
anuai/iucM
c.^n/cM.
C4f*Nur
CMlUr/
SurllBfUa
'SllS.Cu
Horn MOM/
pnHMilpnti/
loimll't
Tmtotf
Mtrnr
iTAU
M
P»
M
M
I.J.
I.J.
M.
N.J.
M.
M
M
K.J.
MM
—
WMS
STATIW TTF[
•Otllt
CWUr Cltr/
cnmrctil
ItiBurMfi/
rattMntUI
wturWR/
raitMnU)
luturttii/
nml/
*S2!rttl
mttirtUI
tidurCM/
cavrcli)
uburou/
mioutui
piturOM/
raitdmtlll
uniar clu/
miur ctu/
COMTCUl
MM
IM1
79-81
7>-ai
MI
7W1
7M1
7M1
7»-«l
;MI
7MI
7M1
7WI
MI (•}
15.2
4
5.7
M
S.7
1.7
2.1
,..
to
J.?
4
4.*
4.6
FMMCC
I"
'*
M*
"
40*
o.
w
»•
""
*"
*"
H*
ROM W.
l»
il
60
Ml
WX,
3000
1000
aim
HIM «tU C»»lKU4 It .
I »-t Mreort
MM UU tr»
. tut Itr
vu« for
»\\nt.
•EltlHUd tttttnt* fro* unur clt)
-------
Non-attainment area Philadelphia. PA.
Trenton, NJ
Wilmington,
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
DE
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/M; if Yes, date 12/80
- Reviewed by: R0(s) No OAQPS No
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/«#; 1f Yes, date 2/22/82
- Reviewed by: RO(s)Yes 3/26/82 OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/8#; if Yes, date 4/05/82
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOX 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio (s) tration(ppm) (ppm) % HC Control
Bristol #391080012 F01
8/27/80 6.9* 0.060 0.176
6/05/79 6.9* 0.042* 0.193
6/15/80 6.9* 0.040 0.183
Camden #310720003 F01
8/07/80 6.9* 0.059 0.164
8/26/80 6.9* 0.020 0.166
Cape May #310780003 F01
6/30/81 6.9* 0.042* 0.200
7/12/81 10.8 0.052 0.150
Chester #391620002 F01
7/13/79 6.9* 0.105 0.183
6/07/79 6.9* 0.043 0.170
8/25/80 5.8 0.042* 0.194
McGuire #312750001 F01
7/16/80 7.7 0.040 0.218
8/02/80 6.9* 0.050 0.173'
7/21/80 6.9* 0.090 0.228
- continued on next page -
o % HC Control Needed To Attain (h NAAOS 44
49
39
20
43
37
45
40
54
38
35
47
43
42
o Remarks :
-------
N.E. Airport £397140024 HOI
8/07/80 6.9*
7/13/79 6.9*
6/15/81 6.9*
8/05/80 6.9
6/29/80 6.9*
Norristown #396540013 F01
8/01/81
7/13/79
6/28/80
Roxbo.rough
7/13/79
7/20/79
6/24/80
7/19/79
7.8
6.9*
6.9*
#397140014 HOI
6.9*
6.9*
8.2
6.9*
0.059
0.105
0.030
0.040
0.030
0.042*
0.105
0.042*
0.105
0.070
0.050
0.032
0.180
0.160
0.180
0.180
0.170
0.221
0.183
0.176
0.200
0.170
0.160
0.170
52
50
48
39
29
54
54
38
59
53
39
37
Somerville #315060001 F01
7/09/79 12.0
Trenton #315400002 F01
6/23/80
6/15/81
8/04/80
6/24/80
7/21/80
6.9*
6.9*
6.9*
8.2
6.9*
0.083
0.040
0.030
0.040
0.050
0.090
0.163
0.164
0.206
0.189
0.171
0.194
58
58
55
45
44
42
* Signifies default values- basis for default values not provided.
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Washington STATE(s): District of Coluabia/Vlrginia/Maryland REGION: III
COUNTIES: District of Columbia; MB - Montgomery. Prince Georges; VA - Arlington. Fairfax,
Loudoun, Prince William
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Washington Council of Governments (Lead Agency, All Sources)
Virginia Air Pollution Control Department; Maryland Bureau of Air Quality
EMISSION IMVtmitMg OATA SOfliAKt
POLLUTANTS IHVEHTORIEO: HC. NO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE TEAR:
6/30/82
19BO
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION: 2.988,171 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHIGHWAY 7/27/82 HIGHWAY 11/1/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
tons/day
3.256.000 (1987) (a)
338
^
327
Area
(31Z)
226
Highway
(66Z)
> PC
\\ <:
N\
*\
/*
\
\
\
\
\
\
>lnt
IX)
224 ,
*•
213
Area
(SOX)
101
Highway
(45Z)
PC
(-
/
**
^ V
X V
X
X
(43Z)
Base Baseline S]
Year Projection 1
1980 1987
)int
51)
1184
\
174
Area
94
Highway
(51Z)
iP Strategy
"rejection
1987 (b)
NITROGEN OXIDES
tons/day
367
Point
(35Z)
239
*c-
205
Highway
(56Z)
* * ^ 337 337
Area
'(9Z)
X
X
X
X
X
X
Base
Year Pi
1980
Point
(39Z)
205
Area
167 -t-
Hlghway
(50Z)
•U1Z)-
Polnt
(39Z)
205
Area
»- 167
Highway
(50Z)
iaseline SIP Strategy
•ejection Projection
1987 1987 (b)
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS HORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Point Sources
Honhighway Area
Highway
Base Year
VOC NO,
3.0
31.6
68.2
38.9
10.3
62.4
Baseline Projection
VOC NO,
3.1
31.3
28.2
36.9
10.6
46.6
SIP Projection Total Z Change (c
VOC
2.8
22.3
26.3
NO,
36.9
22.3
46.6
VOC
- 9
-23
-55
NO,
+ 3
+12
-19
TOTAL
102.8
111.6
62.6
94.1
51.4
94.1
-46
-16
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 21 NO, 16 (d)
COMMENTS: (a) Population derived from 1980 census data and COG 1987 household projections.
(b) SIP strategy inventory estimated by OAQPS. Three different control strategies presently
proposed. Controls In SIP include RACT I. II. I/M. TOTa. RACT on less than 100 TPY sources.
(c) Calculated percent change is for total emissions, not normalised emissions per capita.
(d) Number of major facilities from NECRMP data. Major VOC/NO. source list not submitted.
-------
Non-attainment area Washington, DC/MD/VA
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979, 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/M8
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/M&. If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/MS; if Yes, date 3/22/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
Non-»t tn rant Am
Ulhlfigun. DC/NO/VA
POUUTM
Oim/HO
mac/Mi
SUOAD I
0900200J5I01
090020017101
SITE ID
TlkOM School
Mney Brtncn M. 1
Otnltl St. II M.
Ueit EM Horary
24 1 L Stf.. Ml
CITY/COUXTY
Uilklngton
Mllhlngun
STATE
O.C.
D.C.
SITE
Tr»E
WHS
STATION TYPE
CMtir city/
nildmtUI
enter city/
AVAILABLE
DATA
80-81
80-81
•MBE
HT (.
11
11
rRon cc
llffll
3
FROM M
147
THAfflC
ADI
10.000
OTHCH
Hind aiu colltcud
-------
Non-attainment area Washington. DC/MD/VA
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/Nffi if Yes, date 9/81
Reviewed by: R0(s) No OAQPS No
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/NfcX; 1f Yes, date 4/07/82
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? YesflKK 1f Yes, date 3/22/82
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOv 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio(s) tration(ppm) (ppm) % HC Control
W-shington, DC #090020025101 (Takoma)
7/17/80 8.0* 0.06 0.20 55
7/16/80 8.0* 0.06 0.16 48
8/07/80 8.0* 0.06 0.18 46
8/29/80 8.0* 0.06 0.14 32
7/21/80 8.0* 0.06 0.14 30
o * HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 46.
o Remarks: Other sites used in preliminary modeling, but only the Takoma site
was considered in final modeling.
*median ratio
-------
2.4 Region IV
Louisville, KY/IN
Nashville, TN
fO
01
•a:
00
Q.
00
to
u
a;
t/)
I/I
•— «
C
4-J
2
o
Lul
00
ce.
-------
CITY: Louisville
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(s): Kentucky/Indiana
REGION: IV
COUNTIES: Kentucky - Jefferson; Indiana - Clark, and Floyd
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES; Jefferson County APCD; Indiana State Board of Health - Point Sources
Kentuckiaaa Regional Planning and Development Agency (KIPDA) - Highway Vehicles
Region IV (Engineering-Science) - Area Sources
EMISSION INVENTORY PATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS IBVEKTOR1ZD: RVOC. HO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE!
BASE YEAR: 1980
12/81
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION: 834.837 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: HONHIGHHAY 2/12/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82 886,972 (1987) (a)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kR/day
Inve
Poll
168, 708
X
Point N
(39Z)
102,909
Area "">
(33Z)
47,055
Highway ^,
(28)
{1
Base
Year
1980
ntory
utants
Point Sources
Nonhlghway Area
Highway (e)
X 125. 299
Point ~ -
(45Z)
'V 69.253
Area
(42Z)
"x 16.619
3Z> Highway ( U
• _ 114,499
Point
(40Z)
69,253
Area
(46Z)
16.619
IZ)S Highway
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
244,400
Point
(59Z)
100,246
65,417*"
Highway
(27Z)
Area
(14Z)
^
263,619 263,619
Point
(66Z)
88,410
.*-
51.911
Highway
Baseline SIP Strategy Base Baseline
Projection Projection Year Projection
1987 (b) 1987 (c) 1980 1987
TOTAL AQCT EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection
VOC NO*
78.8 172.7
66.9 41.7
56.4 78.4
VOC NO,
SIP Projection
Area
(20Z)
Point
(66Z)
88.410
k.
51,911
Highway
SIP Strategy
Projection
1987
Total Z Change(d)
VOC NO, VOC NO,
63.2 197.6 Sl.O 197.6 - 31 +22
59.3 41.2 59.3 41.2 - 6 + '5
18.7 58.5 18.7 58.5 - 65 +21
TOTAL
202.1
292.8
141.2
297.3
129.0
297.3 - 32
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC (f) NO, (f)
COMMENTS: (a) 1987 population interpolated fron KIPDA data, (b) 1987 baseline emissions graph
includes controls for Kentucky which should be reflected in the 1987 SIP strategy projection only.
(c) Controls included in SIP for RACT I. II. I/M. TCMs and RACT on all major VOC sources, (d) Cal-
culated percent change is for total emissions not emissions per capita, (e) Nonhlghway mobile
sources included in Kentucky highway emissions, (f) Ho listing for Kentucky major sources.
-------
Non-attainment area Louisville. KY/IN
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
1979, 1980 & 1981
- Base Years: .
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/Htt
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/KKX, If No, what is missing? Some 1981
NMOC & NOx data from modeled sites.
- Accepted by EPA? YesflKK if Yes, date
unknown
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
Mn-Atta1ra«it Area
MUUTAMT!
MC/M,
MC/M.
Onra
torn
Onra
SAHMD f
laiiuuspoi
iszitooown
1UMHZIG01
1S1920027G03
IMMOOO»OI
sm »
BraaMir Mdlul ll<9-
914 bit troMW*
SMoran Pnparty
1U Eiit court Library
HUT T» Offlci B1D».
1916 MUM* An.
litn ScMI
JW1 brditovi U.
tno |M> Muit - ««U S
Nt«l«rH
Cirt/COMTT
U.1..11U/
Jtfdnm
Jtffinm/
Clark
lout mill*/
JrfftnOB
inli'illi/
Jtffman
Ckirlncan/
Clark
ST»T£
M
n
IT
n
nn
SLMS
1MB
HMfS
STATION TTK
Intel trial
ctfiur city/
conrclal
uburtan/
raltdantlal
rurat/
nur aitu
(uburtan/
InkiltHll
DATA
1*81
Jun-itpt
1981
79-81
79-81
6041
KT. (•)
a
foot cc
elt»
• N
a n
a K
MH U
120
ZOO
ADI
BOOB
son
OTHtV
Wna «au eallaetad U tetv «•. Srtanl • llm7100D>: I
it . fimtoent; 1*8 «irpon
M»lag
rna N« n;t in
. oa« for •Mallag.
. nut fcr aeaallag.
-------
Non-attainment area Louisville, KY/IN
MODELING
Modeling Status
Model used:
City-Specific EKMA
Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/NtK if Yes, date
Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS No
unknown
Final Modeling Completed? Yes/Wft 1f Yes, date 6/30/82
Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/Wft 1f Yes, date
12/23/81
Site-Days
Modeled
NMOC/NOv
Ratio(s)
Louisville, KY #182380021601
6/27/80
7/30/80
5/28/80
9/07/80
9/03/79
7.2*
7.2*
7.2*
7.2*
7.2*
Louisville, KY #181920027603
7/16/80
7/12/80
7/08/80
Charlestown,
7/02/80
7/16/80
6/18/81
8/26/80
8/13/80
7.2*
7.2*
7.2*
IN #150640003F01
7.2*
7.2*
7.2*
7.2*
7.2*
Transported
03 Concen-
tration(ppm)
0.061
0.052
0.011
0.042
0.043
0.043
0.043
0.031
0.043
0.043
0.043
0.043
0.043
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.169
0.190
0.175
0.158
0.158
0.186
0.152
0.151
0.18
0.18
0.162
0.178
0.158
Calculated
% HC Control
32.1
29.7
27.2
24.8
19.1
32.9
21.5
15.5
36.9
32.7
32.5
31.2
24.2
*Mean median value - for high ozone days in 1981, also applied to "meteorologically
equivalent days" in 1979-1980.
o * HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 32-5
o Remarks:
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Nashville STATE(s):
COUNTIES: Nashville. Davidson
Tennessee
REGION:
IV
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Metropolitan Health Department of Nashville and Davidson County -
Nonhighway sources; Nashville/Davidson County Metropolitan Planning Commission - Highway
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: RVOC. SO,
DATE'RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR:
3/82
1980
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1982
POPULATION: 495.000 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHIGHWAY 2/12/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
508.300 (1982)
109,080
Point
(34Z)
71.530
Area
(34Z)
34,777
Highway
(32Z)
\
\
\
\
\
v \
\
\
>
v
X
X
69,195 69,195
Point
56,019-
Area
(52Z)
25,293
Highway
(28Z)
<™*>
Point
• 56,019
Area
(52Z)
25.293
Highway
(28Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1982 1982 (b)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
Point
(82)
57.829
Point
(8Z)
53,155
Area
41.41?
Highway
(72Z)
t--. 55.837
->^J 51.123
IV,
(20Z)
Area
39.024
Highway
(70Z)
Base
Year
1980
"(22Z)T*39.024
Baseline
Projection
1982
55.837
51.123
Area
Highway
(70Z)
SIP Strategy
Projection
1982
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Point Sources
Nonhighway Area
Highway
Base
VOC
75.9
74.2
70.3
Year
NO,
9.
23.
83.
4
7
7
Baseline
VOC
25.9
60.4
49.8
Projection
NO,
9.
23.
76.
3
8
8
SIP
VOC
25.9
60.4
49.8
Projection
HOv
9.3
23.8
76.8
Total
VOC
-65
- 8
-27
Z Change (c)
NO,
+ 1
+ 3
- 6
TOTAL
222.4
116.8
136.1
109.9
136.1
109.9 -37
- 3
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 29 NO, (d)
COMMENTS; (a) 1982 population back calculated froa consumer/commercial solvent emissions, (b) Con-
trols include RACT I, II only, (c) Calculated percent change is for total emissions, not emissions
per capita, (d) Listing not included for sources emitting >250kg/day of NO,.
-------
Mon-attainment area Nashville, TN
AIR- QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979. 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency (ies)?
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? XfeS/No. If No, what is missing? All 1981
NMOC & NOx data from modeled sites. _ _
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/MX; 1f Yes, date
11/02/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
•onwuulnat ATM
Kitiwlllt. TH
POLLUTANT
•DC/Ml
MC/NOa
OHM
Onra
SAROAO 1
44ZS400IOKII
44ZS40M2MI
44U20007F01
442(400118)1
sin ID
Itntl Nwltli tattr
311 art An. II
TMMiiM SUU '
unlMnlty
HMmenrint
RockUM tacruttoa ATM
bit Hull* Cntcr
Trinity Unt
MTV/CDUm
•MIMlIll/
BivtatM
Mthtllli/
OivKHn
HMtf*nen*l1U/
Surmr
tallnllli/
Owlaon
STATt
n
n
n
n
sin
nn
MIS
MIS
MK
STATIOH fin
CMiUr city/
run)/
IMustrUl
anur city
rnt«ntul
AVAIUIU
DATA
8041
•041
7»-«l
7M1
PMBE
Ml. (•)
(
4
»
DISTANCC
FROM CC
(knl
CC
CC
11
CC
DISTANCE
FROM RO.
Inl
IS
Si
45
TRAFFIC
APT
10000
1000
10DC
OTMtR:
MM diu collKtM «t Spring Mill . H4O00016i itrtHlli - H4tS40011 > M4tM002?i SMUT Co. - r44M«007
KIMI «u fro - Four ,1m ^tui. th. «..h.iii. .„ _ n«d
suing iMignt d*u fr« ms ttu «t «uinllU. Til 1[ltfl
for Mtollng.
-------
Non-attainment area Nashville, TN
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used:
City-Specific EKMA
Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/IMC; if Yes, date
Reviewed by. R0(s) Yes OAQPS No
1/82
Final Modeling Completed? Yes/MX; If Yes, date
Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS
2/82
Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/MX; if Yes, date by 12/23/81
Site-Days
Modeled
NMOC/NOx
Rafio(s)
Transported
03 Concen-
tration(ppm)
Hendersonville, TN #443320QQ7F01
9/11/81
8/10/80
8/01/80
9/12/81
7/25/80
4.733*
4.733*
4.733*
4.733*
4.733*
Nashville, TN #442540011601
8/10/80
8/01/80
7/02/80
7/25/80
4.733*
4.733*
4.733*
4.733*
0.004
0.043
0.013
0.006
0.035
0.043
0.013
0.015
0.035
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.156
0.132
0.130
0.127
0.127
0.130
0.130
0.130
0.130
Calculated
% HC Control
21.7
18.4
10.8
9.2
8.3
14.a
13.3
12.5
8.7
*Mean median value - for high ozone days in 1981, also applied to "meteorologically
equivalent days" in 1979-1980.
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS
Remarks:
9.2
-------
2.5 Region V
Chicago, IL
Cincinnati, OH
Cleveland, OH
Detroit, MI
Milwaukee, WI
t
1/5
-------
CITY: Chicago
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(s): Illinois, Indiana
REGION:
COUNTIES: IL - Cook. Dupage. Kane, Lake. McHenry and Will; IN - Lake and Porter
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Northeast Illinois Planning Commission (CCA) - Area Sources
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency - Point Sources
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC. HO, BASE YEAR:
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE: 2/13/82
1980
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: (a)
POPULATION: 7.745.109 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHIGEHAY A/1A/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82 7.969.163 (1987)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
1,307,144
Point
(22Z)
1.016.331
Area
(44Z)
439.911
Highway
(34Z)
k
\
\
\
v \
\
\
V
\
\
«
r
(2
909.419
682. set"
Area
(52Z)
210.225
Highway
(23Z)
oint
'\
(22
O
J830.038
619,813
Area
(53Z)
210.225
Highway
(25Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1987 1987 (b)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
I_,730f231
Point
(59Z)
714.409
(11Z)4-
520.371
Highway
(30Z)
S,
\
M, 450, 525 1,450.525
Area
-^
N
N
Point
(60Z)
586.815
Area
*-
397.049
Highway
(27Z)
-(13Z)-
Point
(60Z)
586.815
Area
-*
397,049
Highway
(27Z)
Year
1980
aseline
Projection
1987
SIP Strategy
Projection
1987
Inventory
Pollutants
VOC
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/eap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(c)
VOC
NO,
NO,
VOC
NO,
VOC
NO,
Point Sources 37.6 131.2 28.5 108.4 22.8 108.4 -37 -15
Nonhighway Area 74.4 25.1 59.2 23.8 55.0 23.8 -24 - 2
Highway 56.8 67.2 26.4 49.8 26.4 49.8 -52 -24
TOTAL
168.8
223.5
114.1
182.0
104.2
182.0 -36
-16
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 174 (d) NO* 67 (e)
COMMENTS: (a) Attainment not demonstrated for SE Wisconsin, (b) SIP strategy inventory includes
adopted and contingency measures for IL (i.e. RACT I,II TCM's. I/M and RACT on all 100* TPY
sources of VOC Including RACT III), (c) Calculated percent change for total emissions, not
normalised emissions per capita, (d) Does net Include Lake Co..IN major facilities, (e) Major
facilities in IL portion of ACQR only.
-------
Non-attainment area Chicago, IL/IM
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979. 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/Ms
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/US. If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/KS; 1f Yes, date
unknown
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
(OJI-AtUtl
Cniciao,
POIUTMJ
OniH
Otane
Dim
Onm
ROa/iMK
Ma/MDC
•nit Ana
117 III
SAROAO I
51154D002F01
5I2B80017FOI
I480HMOZFOI
MI7U001FOI
IIIKOOMFOI
I4I220044COI
SITE ID
7944 SMHdu Reid
IS2I mining ton An.
Coir 1 Jukion Strnti
VoMlind Pirk El». SO.
13Z1 Hlloet Itml
Nmn t FilrtanU Ct.
Hui«a of Sclinct 1 InAn.
CITT/CnMTT
(tmht/
ImeiM
Riclnr/
Riclnt
V>uk*8in/
uu
OttrtUld/
uu
C2S9"
Chlcioa/
e«o»
STATE
HI
HI
IL
IL
IL
IL
SITE
WE
«•
MK
NHC
STATIOi Tin
CMUr city/
mlomtlil
cnur city/
«orU. il
Old for
-------
Non-attainment area Chicago, IL/IN
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/MttX; if Yes, date
Reviewed by: R0(s) No OAQPS No
3/01/82
Final Modeling Completed? Yes/Mft; 1f Yes, date 6/30/82
Reviewed by: R0(s) In process OAQPS In process
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? YesAHft; if Yes, date
6/30/82
Site-Days
Modeled
NMOC/NOv
Ratio(s)
Racine, WI #512880017F01
7/21/79
8/01/81
7/18/81
7/10/79
8/26/80
7/27/79
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
Kenosha, WI #511540002F01
7/21/79
7/10/79
8/01/81
7/11/79
7/27/79
8/29/80
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
Transported
03 Concen-
tration(ppm)
0.087
0.066
0.068
0.080
0.070
0.070
0.087
0.080
0.066
0.070
0.070
0.070
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.201
0.200
0.181
0.174
0.170
0.166
0.258
0.209
0.198
0.177
0.167
0.163
Calculated
* HC Control
% Control
Values
for
Individual
Days
Not Provided
in SIP
- continued on next page -
o % HC Control Needed to Attain 03 NAAQS 20 - 41 based on WI 0^ data**
o Remarks: *Due to the limited HC data, range of ratios from 6:1 and 16:1 used
for all modeling days to calculate range of HC control. **Lower range based
on IL data also presented in draft SIP. All these estimates are tentative.
Use of ranges and other aspects of modeling analysis have'not been approved by
EPA.
-------
Deerfjeld, IL #141760001F01
7/21/79
7/17/81
9/05/79
7/07/81
8/29/80
Waukegan, IL
7/21/79
8/01/81
7/10/79
8/29/80
8/26/80
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
#148020002F01
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
6&16*
0.087
0.068
0.057
0.077
0.070
0.087
0.066
0.080
0.070
0.070
0.162
0.161
0.143
0.142
0.139
0.186
0.172
0.158
0.153
0.139
-------
CITY: Cincinnati
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(s): Ohio/Kentucky
REGION:
COUNTIES: OH - Butler. Clemont. Hamilton, Warren; KY - Boone, Campbell, Ken ton.
Region IV (Pacific Environmental Services) - Area; Ohio/Kentucky/
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Indiana Council of Covermaent - Htgtmay; Kentucky Department of
Natural teftource Environment Protection. Ohio Environmental Proteetloa Agency and Southwest
Ohio Air Air Pollution Control - Point
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: NMHC. HO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR:
1/82
1980
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1982
POPULATION: 1.625.897 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHICHHAY 6/15/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
1.638.630 (1982)(a)
Base
Year
1980
Inventory
Pollutants
Baseline
Projection
1982
303,716
Point
(31Z)
208,713
Area
(28Z)
123,104
Highway
(41Z)
V
S 248,750 248,750
X
** •«. ^
Point
(27Z)
181,630
Area
(30Z)
105,964
Highway
(43Z)
Point
(27Z)
181,630
Area
(30Z)
105.964
Highway
(43Z)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
SIP Strategy
Projection
1982 (b)
336,697
Point
(50Z)
167,195
.*-
132.637
Highway
(40Z)
Area
(10Z)
•3
347,895
Point
(54Z)
186,979
Area •*•
124,333
Highway
(36Z)
(10Z)-
347,895
Point
(54Z)
186.979
*-Area
124.333
Highway
(36Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1982 1987
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/eap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(c)
VOC
HO,
VOC
NO,
VOC
NO,
VOC
NO,
Point Sources 58.4 104.2 41.0 114.1 41.0 114.1 -29 +10
Nonhighway Area 52.7 21.3 46.2 21.7 46.2 21.7 -12 + 3
Highway 75.7 81.6 64.7 76.5 64.7 76.5 -14 - 5
TOTAL
186.7
207.1
151.9
212.3
151.9
212.3 -18
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 54 NO, 35 (d)
COMMENTS: (a) Interpolated from 1980 and 1987 population, (b) Controls include RACT I and II
only, (c) Calculated percent change for total emissions, net emissions per capita, (d) OH only.
No listing of major NO, sources in KY.
-------
Hon-attainment area Cincinnati. OH/KY
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979. 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified fay State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/NJS
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? m/No. If No, what is missing? All
NMOC data.
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/M8; if Yes, date 12/09/82
o Site Descriptions [for sites used 1n SIP analysis.)
fm-Atuinm Am
POUUTMT!
DZOIM
OlOflt
a«mi
OlOM
IMC/Kb/
tout
SUMO 1
IttUOOUGK
J61Z200WS01
JiMMKBGDl
i»ozeooo3f03
M122M2M01
sin n
MM Blpplt toid
«H G«t Stract
Southtnt Suu bwity
Jet. (T 338 » «T S36
Ont« WtplUI
yist etlbnin u.
cin/nuin
Caliraln/
lUBlllWI
C1K<»MM/
IMilun
LiMm/
Mmn
Ent tend/
Boom
Cinclmtl/
IMiltan
STMI
ot
«H
OH
KT
OH
SITE
TTPt
IUW
STH1M UPC
run I/ .
InduttrUl
UAtar city/
India trill
irixirtun/
mldtntKI
rvnl/
umaliritd
llrfMtftMIU*
ralOMitUI
CA1»
H-B1
N41
n-ai
79 -ai
7S-81
m («)
i
4
S
FMN CC
ROM u
_lal—
n
U1
SHI
BIKER:
mi* « dtu f m
Ilitng hctght uu In
. in*d for
. IOM for
-------
Non-attainment area Cincinnati. QH/KY
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used:
City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/UK; if Yes, date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) No OAQPS No.
2/15/82
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/MK; If Yes, date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS
9/23/82
Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/MC; if Yes, date
9/22/82
Site-Days
Modeled
Warren Co., OH
6/15/79
7/20/80
6/13/80
6/19/80
7/16/80
Cincinnati, OH
6/18/80
6/26/80
6/19/80
6/28/79
7/25/80
Colerain,
7/02/80
7/16/80
7/20/79
8/25/80
8/29/80
OH
Transported
NMOC/NOx 03 Concen-
Ratio(s) tration(ppm)
#363400002301
3.9*
3.9*
3.9*
3.9*
3.9*
#361220019601
3.9*
3.9*
3.9*
3.9*
3.9*
'362720010G02
3.9*
3.9*
3.9*
3.9*
3.9*
0.054
0.068
0.072
0.075
0.073
0.081
0.068
0.075
0.038
0.070
0.073
0.073
0.050
0.070
0.055
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.138
0.145
0.147
0.137
0.135
0.150
0.150
0.135
0.132
0.132
0.172
0.137
0.135
0.137
0.132
Calculated
% HC Control
16.0
16.6
14.7
14.3
11.4
19
14
11
8
6
21.6
10
9
7
3
*Mean median ratio
- continued on next page -
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS
14.3
o Remarks:
-------
Boone Co., KY #180280003F03
6/18/80 3.9* 0.081 0.165 26.3
6/19/80 3.9* 0.075 0.145 20.0
6/15/80 3.9* 0.044 0.160 18.5
6/14/80 3.9* 0.069 0.135 13
7/13/79 3.9* 0.040 0.130 7
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Cleveland
STAIE(s): Ohio
REGION:
COUNTIES: Cuyahoga. Lake. Loraln. Medina
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency - area and highway; Ohio
Environmental Protection Agency - point.
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: RVOC. NO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR:
2/82
1980
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1982
POPULATION: 2.. 191.600 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NOHHICHWAY 3/10/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
2.268.000 (1982)(a)
421,037
Point
(15Z)
356,392
Area
(40Z)
188,481
Highway
(45Z)
\
\
\ \
V
N
X
322.524
281.152
Area
(39Z)
155.463
Highway
(48Z)
Point
(13Z)
JL
322.524
"^81.152
Area
(39Z)
155,463
Highway
(48Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1982 1982 (b)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
463.725
Point
(39Z)
281.406
Area
(25Z>
166.332
Highway
(36Z)
^•-. 459,920 459.920
*• *^
s-^
Point
(41Z)
268,465
Area
(25Z)
154.564
Highway
(34Z)
Point
(41Z)
268.465
Area
(25Z)
154,564
Highway
(34Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1982 1982
TOTAL AQCE EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/eap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Point Sources
Nonhighway Area
Highway
TOTAL
Base
VOC
29.5
76.6
86.0
192.1
Year
NO,
83.2
52.5
75.9
211.6
Baseline Projection
VOC NO,
18.7
55.4
68.5
142.2
84.4
50.2
68.1
202.8
SIP Projection Total Z Change (c
VOC
18.7
55. 4
68.5
142.2
HO,
84.4
50.2
68.1
202.8
VOC
-34
-25
-18
-23
NO,
+ 5
- 1
- 7
- 1
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 44 NO, 21
COMMENTS: (a) Calculated using growth factors in OH SIP, (b) Controls include RACT I and II
only, (c) Calculated percent change is for total emissions, not normalized emissions per capita.
-------
Non-attainment area Cleveland. OH
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979, 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yesflto
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Xgx/No. If No, what is missing? All
NMOC data collected bv Battelle.
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/ONo; 1f Yes, date
12/09/82
c Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
Non-AtuiiBent «n«
ClmtllM. OH
POUUTA*
MOCVNO
mOCVNO
Ozone
SAROAD 1
IS1300013H01
16130000 JH01
365320002GOZ
sin 10
Cut »* Street 1
hoodlind A.e
Eest 1S2 St.
71 Ei«t Htgn Street
CITT/COUin
ClenleneV
Cuyehoge
Cle»elend/
Cuyehoge
Leke
STAH
OH
OH
OH
SITE
TTPE
NMB
KM6
STATION TTPE
center city/
coeMrclel
center city/
coaerctel
center city/
coBWXiel
AMILMIE
DATA
81
81
79-81
PROBE
KT. (•
,
14
DISTANCE
FROM CC
(km)
10
DISTANCE
FROM RD
fnl
IS
a
TRAFflC
ADI
6000
11800
OTHtR
Hind d«u collected it.
Hind deu Inm
Sreiter Cl.»l.nd
Nl.lng height deu fr.
: spectn deu collected tn t
p.. ton. Ph..
1981 bv tittelle
.used foroMellng.
. uied for eMellng.
-------
Non-attainment area Cleveland, OH
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/HB; if Yes, date unknown
- Reviewed by: R0(s) unknown OAQPS No
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/M¥; 1f Yes, date 6/09/82
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes (7/03/82) QAQPS Yes (7/03/82)
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/fKX; if Yes, date 6/09/82
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOy 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio(s) tration(ppm) (ppm) % HC Control
Painesville, OH #365320002602
7/14/80 5.78* 0.058 0.152 20.5
8/20/81 5.78* 0.088 0.128 8.0
9/12/79 5.78* 0.069 0.121 0
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 8.0**
o Remarks: *Based on HC species data collected in summer 1981 By Battelle. **Used
2nd high value in 3 years, suggested by Region V, due to monitoring uncertainies/
deficiencies. Control value based on 1980 emissions. State projected attainment
in 1982 based on estimated emissionreductions.
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Detroit
STATE(s): Michigan
REGION:
COUNTIES: Wayne. Oakland. Maconb
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Michigan Department of Natural Resources
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC. HO,
-DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR: 1980
7/82
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION: 4,043.633 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: HONBICHVAY 9/16/82 HIGHWAY 11/1/82 3.883.800 (1987)(a)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
leg/day
701,767
Point
(29Z)
494,666
Area
(27Z)
305,981
Highway
<44Z)
V
\
\
\
k\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
428,482
Point
(322)
291,955
Area
(42Z)
113,694
Highway
(26Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1987 (b) 1987 (c,d
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
677,145
Point
(43Z)
377,008
296,202
Highway
(422)
Area
X
620,141
Point
(51Z)
295.682
203,600~
Highway
(33Z)
Area
(16Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1987 (b) 1987 (c)
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Point Sources
Nonhlghvay Area
Highway
TOTAL
Base
VOC
51.2
46.7
75.6
173.5
Year
NO,
71.9
24.8
70.8
167.5
Baseline
VOC
35.2
45.9
29.3
110.4
Projection
NO,
81.1
26.1
52.4
159.6
SIP Projection Total Z Change (e;
VOC NO, VOC NO,
(c)
Humber of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 55 NO, (f)
COMMENTS: (a) No '87 population in SIP. Calculated from 1980 census data using SMCOG growth
factors, (b) Ho credit taken for I/M en TCM'a in baseline projection inventory, (c) Ho strategy
inventory summary tables. Data could not be readily derived from SIP. (d) Controls in SIP
include RACT I. II. all 100+ TPY VOC sources, and TCM'e. (e) Calculated percent change for total
emissions, (f) No major faeilitiea list submitted. Number of VOC sources provided by Region V.
-------
Non-attainment area
Detroi t. MI
AIR- pUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979. 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/NtX
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? m/No. If No, what is missing? Some 1981
2nd, 3rd & 4th quarter 03 data and all NMOC & NOx data from modeled sites.
- Accepted by EPA? YesflKK if Yes, date 11/29/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
•on-Atutnmi Int
Duron. HI
rouUTANI
OMM
Onm
Dim
Oiont
MOC/NO«
SARIMO 1
Z31IUOI9G01
ZM9MOOVOI
ZUMOODWB
Z39M390ZJ03
Z3IUOIOOJH
SITE ID
UNO (ist $••» Hilt Rd.
16«l" 1 ClKtrlc AM.
S7TOO Sntlel
BM.akt Orion
(not In SAMAD)
Scttnc* Cnrtir
CITV/COUXTV
Detroit/
rort ftjron/
St. Clltr
««• HUM/
HtC0*
to troll/
STUTE
III
MI
HI
III
III
SITE
TTPE
STATION TTK
tuburtiV
mld«rtUI
suburMn/
mtdtfitUI
,uKjrt>«n/
coBircUl
AVAIIABU
DATA
79-el
79-8)
to-*i
n
Bl
MOM
NT. (•)
FRMCC
DISTANCE
FROM RD.
TRAFFIC
ABT
OTMtR-
HIM ttlt CDllMtM it M —.
HIM d*u fro» ^..^ .1,..
Hlilng httghl feu frw
.uutf for KxliMng.
mtd for nailing.
-------
Non-attainment area Detroit. MI
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? unknown
- Reviewed by: R0(s) OAQPS
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/KSft 1f Yes, date 8/06/82
- Reviewed by:. R0(s) - Yes OAQPS Yes (8/31/82)
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/Mb; if Yes, date 8/06/82
Site-Days
Modeled
Detroit, MI
7/18/81
/22/80
//01/81
7/10/80
7/07/81
NMOC/NOX
Ratio(s)
#231180019601
4.8*
4.8*
4.8*
4.8*
4.8*
Transported
03 Concen-
tration(ppm)
0.060
0.091
0.040
0.060
0.057
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.158
0.139
0.154
0.133
0.128
Calculated
% HC Control
29.8
24.3
22.7
21.3
17.7
GM-Lake Orion, MI #239963902J03 (not tn SAROAD)
6/25/80
7/20/80
5/28/80
8/29/80
8/28/80
Port Huron,
6/12/80
5/28/80
6/29/81
8/26/80
7/18/81
4.8*
4.8*
4.8*
4.8*
4.8*
MI 0234340003F01
4.8*
4.8*
4.8*
4.8*
4.8*
0.057
0.057
0.057
0.057
0.008
O.OS7
0.050
0.068
0.055
0.060
0.152
0.137
0.129
0.128
0.142
0.155
0.145
0.135
0.134
0.13Q
29.6
24.8
16.9
16.7
8.4
33.3
26.3
21.4
19.5
14.6
- continued on next page -
*Mean median ratio
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 27.1
Remarks:
-------
New Haven, MI #233140009602
7/18/81 4.8* 0.060 0.180 39.5
7/19/80 4.8* 0.057 0.149 30.2
8/26/80 4.8* 0.077 0.151 27.1
8/25/80 4.8* 0.057 0.145 22.5
7/14/80 4.8* 0.075 0.131 19.7
7/11/81 4.8* 0.136 18.1
7/17/81 4.8* 0.047 0.129 16.2
-------
CITY: Milwaukee
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(s): Wisconsin
REGION:
COUNTIES: Kenosha. Racine, Walworth, Waukesha, Milwaukee, Washington, Oaaukee
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources - Point
Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission - Area
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVEHTDRISDt VOC. KO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR: 1980
7/82
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION: 1.764.919 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: HONHIGHWAY 8/23/82 HIGHWAY 8/23/82 2.007.980 (1987)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
336,379
Point
(26Z)
248,973
Area
(44Z)
100,204
Highway
(30Z)'
k
\
\
\
^ \
\
\
\
^
\
\
\
231,440
Point
(23X)
177,767
Area
(63Z)
31.381
Highway
(14Z)
231.440
Point
(23Z)
177.767
Area
(63Z)
31.381
Highway
(14Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1987 (a) 1987 (b)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
312,373
Point
(43Z)
177.623
Area
(16Z)
127.057
Highway
(41Z)
^-.301,021 301,021
x
X
X
X
X
Point
(51Z)
145.841
Area
(18Z)
92.298
Highway
(31Z)
Point
(51Z)
145,841
Area
(18Z)
92.298
Highway
(31Z)
Baae Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1987 1987
Inventory
Pollutants
VOC
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(c)
VOC
NO,
NO,
VOC
NO,
VOC
NO,
Point Sources 49.5 76.3 26.7 77.3 26.7 76.3 -39 -15
Nonhlghway Area 84.3 28.7 72.9 26.7 72.9 28.7 - 2 +6
Highway 56.8 72.0 15.6 45.9 15.6 72.0 -69 -27
TOTAL
190.6
177.0
115.2
149.9
115.2
177.0 -31
- 4
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 51 NO* 19
COMMENTS: (a) Includes I/M credits (except Walworth County), (b) SIP includes no additional
controls beyond RACT I.II. (c) Calculated percent change for total emissions, not per capita.
-------
Hon-attainment area Milwaukee, WI
AIR-QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979, 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/M»
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? X«K/No; If No, what is missing? NMOC
data from modeled sites.
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/Hft; if Yes, date
unknown
o Site Descriptions (for sites used 1n SIP analysis.)
•n-Atutimt Aw
mlMllkct. HI
POU.UTMT
MC*/Mx
IMOC*/HO>
tent
MQCVNbi
DM
MMMD 1
S12H004SFOI
siaooMifoi
siznooaoFoz
S1260D005F01
SITE IB
J716 Hnl Mlouftco Aio.
:114 bit Umoat it.
Ufilnnlty of Vitamin
606 Hoit (llooumt An.
Craf ton H1»a School
1»SO Niiklagten St.
ciTr/caurrr
MhMllkH/
minute*
MltaMikn/
MlMUkM
NllvMlkM/
MlMUkM
Ountat Co.
STATE
HI
HI
HI
HI
SITE
TtPf
•MS
MK
HK
MM
STATIIH TTPt
entor city/
mldutul
cntor city/
mldatKl
enter city/
cowcitl
•Mbuvten/
rotlBcMUI
AHAIIABU
DATA
«
»-«l
SI
7W1
I>I108E
HT. (•)
9
a
11
9
DISTAMCC
FKHCC
(In)
OIS1ANCE
FRW U
Iml
9
tt
3D
61
TRAFFIC
ACT
1000
1000
6797
as*
OTHOI;
Mod tfiU contend it.
Vlod diu froo
MUMtOII. VI
Nlilng talcht mu frgoj _
•HOC ipKlii y HuMngton Suto Unlnnlty
.nod foropdtllag.
. a*t for oMiltno.
-------
Non-attainment area Milwaukee. WI
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? unknown
- Reviewed by: R0(s) OAQPS
- Final Modeling Completed? YesyMKK if Yes, date 7/01/82
-_Rey.1ewed_by:. R0(s.) In process OAQPS In process
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/WX; if Yes. date 7/01/82
Site-Days
Modeled
Ozaukee County
7/23/79
8/01/81
8/26/80
7/07/81
6/14/80
Milwaukee, WI
8/01/81
7/23/79
7/07/81
8/26/80
8/09/79
6/14/80
Transported
NMOC/NOv 03 Concen-
Ratio(s) trationCppm)
, WI #512600005F01
5.46**
5.46**
5.46**
6.4***
5.46**
#512200041F01
5.46**
5.46**
6.4***
5.46**
5.46**
5.46**
0.103
0.083
0.068
0.080
0.084
0.083
0.103
0.080
0.068
0.052
0.084
Peak 03
Concentration Calculated
(ppm) % HC Control
0.206 59.3
0.165 46.1
0.177 41.3
0.139 29.4
0.140 28.6
0.202 57.6
0.189 55.7
0.167 47.9
0.172 40.9
0.168 38.9
0.138 26.9
o % HC Control Needed -To Attain 03 NAAQS 29.4 to 40.9*
o Remarks: *Range due to uncertainy of which of two sites to use for control design
value. Higher value site believed significantly impacted upon by Chicago but
difficult to quantify. Lower value site primarily impacted by Milwaukee. Esti-
mates tentative. Use of range and other aspects of modeling analysis have not
been approved by EPA. **Arithmetic mean of ratios of measured values during seven
1981 high On (>0.10 ppm-1 hr max) days. ***Arithmetic mean of ratios of measured
values for 7/07/81.
-------
2.6 Region VI
Houston, TX
Ol
to
o
o
o
HI
2
to
E
o
LU
CO
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Houston
STATE(s):
Texas
COUNTIES:
Harris
REGION: VI
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Texas Air Control Board - Point and Area
Houston-Calveston Area Council - Highway
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: RVOC .NO, BASE YEAR:
3/B2
1980
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION: 2.409.544 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: KOHHIGHWAY 4/26/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82 2.900.704 (1987)
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
tons/year
231.250
Point
(60Z)
97.724
Area j,
60.079
Highway
(26Z)
^
\
\
\
\
\
<14Z)
X
S>
\
\
>
123. SIB
Faint
(54Z)
56.648
Area
(28Z)
21.640
Highway
(18Z)
— _ •
121.854
Point
(55Z)
54.984
Area
(29Z)
19.976
Highway
(16Z)
NITROGEN OXIDES (a)
tons/year
Year
1980
Baseline SIP Strategy
Projection Projection
1987 (b.c) 1987 (c.d)
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
203.000
Point
Area
(T)
Highway
Baae
Year
1980
I
Pi
200.000
tasellne
•ejection
1987
1
SIP
Prc
200,000
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
Strategy
tjection
1987
Inventory
Pollutants
Base
VOC
Point Sources
Nonhighway
Highway
Area
143,
33.
62.
.2
.7
.1
Year
NO,
(a)
Baseline
VOC
50.5
26.4
16.3
Projection
NO*
(a)
SIP
VOC
50.5
26.4
15.1
Projection
NO,
(a)
Total Z
VOC
-52
' + 7
Change
(a)
TOTAL
239.0
209.8(a)
93.2
[150](a)
92.0 |150](a) -47 [0](a)
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 61 NO, (f)
COMMENTS: (a) Only base year NO, emission total provided. Projected NO, emissions from RO 6 Tech.
Support Doc, and are only approximations, (b) Includes the effects of RACT I. II and I/M but net
TCM's. (c) I/M reduction based on TACB estimates. RO 6 estimates '87 highway emissions as 33.834
tons, (d) Includes TCM's and all items under footnote (b). (e) Calculated percent change for
total emissions, not per capita emissions, (f) No NO, major facilities list.
-------
Non-attainment area Houston, TX
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1978, 1979 & 1980' (State does not intend to analyze
for the effect of 1981 air quality data on control strategy)
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Aaency(ies)?
Yes/lW
- Are all data entered In SARDAD? Xgg/Ko; If No, what is missing? Some
data from modeled days.
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/Ma;'However, proposed adjustments to data pending EPA
approval.*
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
POLLUTANT
UK/Ml
MOC/Ml
MOC/lfe
OlOM
Om
Om
OHM
Bum
OIOM
OHM
OHM
MMADf
454715001 fOl
4J51 70002 F01
4*0110009 Ffll
452U0024 FBI
4SZSCOOM FOI
4UMOOIS Ml
45HM037 HOI
452560038 HOI
4SZSH047MI
452SCOONK01
4S2SMQS1 NCI
S1TI ID
Itttra* Int. School
2701 llth An. N
GiorgU it CunalnghM
4510 Alelnt Mil M
II6I Hn Dr.
9SiS Clinton Or
HC7 Cnwfort it PoH
8314 Pirthirn
4401HUngH
78M F«w
ia»Croa>Mt
ciTT/courrr
SHbraok/
Wrrit
tall City/
blmun
iMUBttt/
Jtfftnaa
Nooitai/
Nnrli
(•vita*/
Mirrls
MuttoV
Hirrtt
Hirrlf
Hxntaa'
mrrU
HMiltcW
Mil III
Nntun'
Hirrli
Nauiua/
Mirrtt
STATE
n
TI
TJ
n
n
TI
n
n
n
n
n
SITE
TT«
•
STAT1W TTK
nit uaaorrlil
lub-mldonilil
iv»-ml«ti»lil
tuk-mldMtUl
M*>r«ldtnMil
ua-loduitnil
MDUr cltj/
^^
ub.rt*1oMtUl
AVAILABLE
DATA
78-81
T»-;»
n-tt
78-80
78-81
18-80
78-80
78-80
78-80
TWO
78-80
PROBE
XT. (•)
3
S
4
4
FUNK
40.Z
48.3
K8.7
11.1
B
3.2
ec
11. 1
14.1
19
FION DO.
3«
13
13
UT
500
10,000
100
onm-
MM 4IU ullKUd It
TAP
4«d Hatty nrppit
mix diu fra atfftf»trt «lui for dtfftrnit rm
Hlilig hHoH teU fro »lctoHi i UU Oarltt na lUtlonl aut ^ M^11—
' L" ^J? some adjustments to certain 03 data based on differences in instru-
.... ration methods. EPA is examining the documentation submitted by TACB to
these adjustments. • y
-------
Non-attainment area Houston. TX
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used:
City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/X&; if Yes, date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
11/81
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/TO; 1f Yes, date unknown
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
• Modeling Days Selected? Yes/MS; if Yes, date
11/81
Site-Days
Modeled
Houston, TX
4/05/79
8/21/80
5/31/79
6/28/79
11/02/80
NMOC/NOv
Ratio(s)
#452330024F01
6.6
7.5
6.6
5.8
Houston, TX 0452560034F01
4/24/79
5/17/80
8/21/80
10/08/80
9/13/80
Houston, TX
9/13/80
5/17/80
8/07/79
6/28/78
7/18/78
6.8
5.7
7.5
5.8
5.8
#452560047H01
7.5
7.5
7.5
6.6
6.6
Transported
03 Concen-
tration(ppm)
0.102
0.097
0.10
0.06
0.076
0.085
0.09
0.115
0.11
0.
0.
0,
0,
110
085
08
10
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.20*
0.22
0.18*
0.20*
0.21
0.20*
0.24
0.26
0.27
0.097
0.34
0.29
0.22
0.22
0.18*
0.24*
Calculated
% HC Control
48.5
46.6
42.
40.
20.3
52.3
50.0
44.8
41.2
36.5
46.7
39.8
35.6
35.3
32.7
- continued on next page -
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 41
o Remarks: *These ozone values based on proposed 18% reduction applied by TACB to
the measured ozone concentrations for differences in instrument calibration meth-
ods. See remarks in Houston - Air Quality.
-------
Houston, TX
6/14/79
6/30/78
8/25/80
8/23/80
8/04/78
Houston, TX
5/17/80
6/30/78
10/08/80
9/13/80
7/18/78
Houston, TX
4/24/79
7/18/78
4/05/79
6/28/79
11/03/78
7/02/80
Houston, TX
7/17/78
'05/78
/23/80
8/04/78
11/05/80
Houston, TX
5/17/80
9/13/80
10/08/80
10/01/78
7/18/78
0452560051H01
6.6
6.6
6.6
5.8
6.6
#452560035H01
7.5
6.6
5.8
5.8
5.8
#452560038H01
5.8
6.6
6.6
6.6
5.8
7.5
M52560039H01
6.6
6.6
5.8
5.8
5.8
#452560037H01
7.5
6.6
6.6
5.8
5.8
0.114
0.068
.08
.08
0.
0.
0.076
0.085
0.068
.115
,110
0.
0.
0.097
0.076
0.097
0.102
0.10
0.09
0.04
068
085
105
076
0.03
0.085
0.110
0.115
0.068
0.097
0.24*
0.29*
0.24
0.26
0.23*
0.28
0.23
35
.30
0.
0.
0.21*
0.20*
0.22*
0.20*
0.20*
0.21*
0.22
0.21*
0.24*
0.26
0.22*
0.22
0.22
0.27
0.26
0.22*
0.23*
52.0
50.3
43.7
38.5
33.3
51.3
47.5
46.5
38.6
26.2
52
49,
46
40,
32,
32.5
44.7
39.9
35.7
32.1
43.2
43.0
41.2
36.6
31.0
-------
2.7 Region VII
St. Louis, MO/IL
c
•^
u_
OJ
Q.
>•*
t/5
OJ
C1.
c
-------
19B2 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: St. Louis
STATE(s):
Missouri/Illinois
REGION: VII
COUNTIES: HO - Jefferson. St. Charles. St. Louis; P. - Madison. St. Glair
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Missouri Department of Natural Resources, Illinois EPA - Point
E-W Gateway Coordinating Council - Highway; RO VII (Pacific Environmental Service) - Area
EMISSION INVESTOR? DATA S1BMAS.Y
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: YOC. BO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR:
3/4/82
1980 03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: (a)
POPULATION: 2.361.000 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONH1GHWAY 6/14/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
2.532.000 (1987)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
521.804
Point
(35Z)
339.094
Area
<38Z)
\ 43 ,240
Highway
(27Z)
Base
Year
1980
Inventory
Pollutants
x 376.630 349.344
Point
(37Z)
236.640
Area
(48Z)
58,490
Highway
(16Z)
Point
(35Z)
228.206
Area
(48Z)
58,490
Highway
(17Z)
Baseline
Projection
1987(b)
SIP Strategy
Projection
1987 (c)
765.170
Point
(68Z)
240.360
189. 590 «
Highway
(25Z)
^*
Area
£
740,010
Point
(72Z)
206.560
*-
151,060
Highway
Area
(8Z>
JL
(20Z)
740,010
Point
<72Z)
b 16, 560
151.060
Highway
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
19BO 1987 1987
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Base Year ' Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(d)
VOC NO, VOC NCv VOC NO, VOC NO,
Point Sources 77.4 222.3 55.5 210.7 47.8 210.7 -34 + 2
Nonhigtmay Area 83.0 21.5 70.1 21.9 67.0 21.9 -13 + 9
Highway 60.7 80.3 23.1 59.7 23.1 59.7 -59 -20
TOTAL
221.1
324.1
148.7
292.3
137.9
292.3 -33
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 78 NO, 37
COMMENTS: (a) Attainment by 1987 not demonstrated, (b) I/M credit included in baseline
projection, (c) Controls included in SIP are RACT I. II, I/M. and TCM's. All contigeneies
included for IL strategy projections. MO includes RACT on 100 TPY nonRACT sources.
(d) Calculated percent change for total emissions not emissions per capita.
-------
Non-attainment area St. Louis, MO/IL
AIR- QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979,1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
XttE/No - (see next item)
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? XtM/No. If No, what is missing? St. Louis
City data for 1981 still missing due to QA problems; apparently not con-
sidered essential for modeling analysis.
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/Ntt; if Yes, date 11/26/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
Kon-Attliranl Aru
St. Loull. MO/IL
POLLUTANT
IMK/NO<
OIOM
OIOM
OIOM
OIOM
OIOM
OIOM
OIOM
Qua*
OIOM
OIOM
OIOM
OIOM
OIOM
OtOM
-
OIOM
OIOM
OIOM
OIOM
OIOM
SAMMD 1
26104000IG01
264280064HOI
2642B0007N01
264280MIMI
2M2BOD62H9I
2642B0063MOI
264230001GOI
26I600D9IU1
264120001G01
264XODOKOI
2622BOOI2F01
264I60002F01
264I60008JH
I40I60006N1
I44&BOQ07FOI
14468090BFOI
I48S20007F01
147960001F01
I42I200IOF01
SITE 10
SS Nunur St
212 Tucktr St.
8227 Soutn BrotOMy
Shrm 1 1-70
Rlnr OH Ptm i Sulfur
Cluln of Rockt Mttr Sin.
5962 S. LlMJ»rg
1400 Ptnkill Rd.
St. Clurltf Rock M.
305 ntldMn Rd.
Arnold Tmoraok t
Ttntraok
t.E. Star* Mff 94
HOT 94 45 It. S. of US 40
ZTOBEdwrtt
POM Id.
District II hllct No..
Rt. IS9
Wttr Trwtotat Plmt
45 Wlcott
USDA Blag.
ll"1 1 Tudor
CITT/COUKTT
Cliyton/
St. Loull to.
St. Loull City/
St. louli to.
St. Louli City/
St. Louli to
St. Loull City/
St. Loull to.
St. Loult City/
St. Loull Co.
St. Loull City/
St. Loull to.
AftoV
St. Loult to.
FlerlitMt/
St. Loull to.
St. Aon/
St. Loull to.
Oumy ••!*/
St. Loull to.
Arnold/
Jofftrun
•tit Alton/
St. Darin to,
MBUVlIlt/
St. Cotrlti to,
Altoo/
HMlua to.
EdMrd»111t/
NMIUB to.
(Urjrtillt/
NMlun to.
Mood ftlmr/
Mdlson to.
Wttrloo/
Nonro* to.
Ult St. Louti/
St. CUir
STATE
MO
M
HO
M
NO
NO
NO
NO
pg
N9
NO
NO
ID
11
IL
IL
11
IL
II
SITE
TYPE
SLAW
SLANS
SUMS
SUMS
SUMS
8MB
SUMS
SUMS
SLANS
MHS
SUMS
SUNS
SUNS
SUMS
SUMS
SUMS
STATION TTPt
MDuroin/
COBDtrcIll
ctnur city/
nootrcul
cmtcr city/
rtildtnttil
ctnur city/
Indus trtll
ctnur city/
Indui trill
ctnur city/
contrcul
wburbui/
cooMrclil
Mburatn/
coMtrcUl
suburou/
rural/
ottr until
lutmrtxn/
mldntlil
luburoin/
joda trill
raral/
ogrlcultunl
wburaw/
rasldtatltl
rural/
tori cultural
rani/
tgrl cultural
luburatn/
Indui trill
rural/
•grl cultural
AVAILABLE
DATA
7941
7840
7940
7940
7940
7940
7941
7941
7941
7941
1961
7941
8041
7941
7941
7941
7941
7941
7941
PIOBE
HT (•)
1.8
10.S
1.6
4.S
z.o
4.1
1.8
4.1
4.2
10
I.S
4.0
4.0
8.0
S.O
S.O
DISTANCE
FROM CC
It ml
14
CC
10
8
10
IS
18
IS
20
26
26
28
60
X
10
24
26
32
4
D1S1ANCE
FRM RO.
'
IDS
25
80
24
TRAFFIC
ADT
now
100
2SOO
1000
OTHER
Wad diU collccttd it xrloui lorncy ilus in< Itatttt Airport
Hind diu fro*
Ceo ilu (unldHitltlia)
NUing Mtgflt
-------
Non-attainment area St. Louis, MO/IL
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/Xdb; if Yes, date unknown
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS No
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/106; if Yes, date unknown
- Reviewed by: R0(s) In process OAQPS In process
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/35116; if Yes, date unknown
Site -Days
Modeled
St. Louis Co. ,
7/17/80
8/22/81
6/03/79
9/11/79
6/30/80
St. Louis, MO
6/03/79
10/09/80
7/21/79
10/07/80
St. Louis, MO
7/20/79
- 7/19/79
7/21/79
Transported
NMOC/NOv 03 Concen-
Ratio(s) tration(ppm)
MO #261040001601
6*
6*
6*
6*
6*
#264280007H01
6*
6*
6*
6*
#26428006 1H01
6*
6*
6*
Peak 03
Concentration Calculated
(ppra) % HC Control
0.171 46.6
0.153 37.4
0.156 35.2
0.170 33.6
0.139 18.3
0.153 32.4
0.136 15.5
0.133 13.6
0.133 12.7
0.151 31.7
0.148 30.9
0.143 21.0
- continued on next page -
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 24.9*
o Remarks: *Determined from median NMOC and NOx values for 1981 at suburban site;
r
no usable NMOC data from CBD in base years. **Based on proposed -13.6% adjust-
ment of 4th highest control value for Florissant. MD site as credit for estimated
reduction in VOC emissions from 1979 to 1980. Still tentative, proposed adjust-
ment and use of some assumptions deviating from EPA guidance have not been approved
***Illoaical result.
-------
ot. Louis, MO #264230001601
7/13/80 6* 0.171 45.6
7/17/81 6* 0.161 40.5
7/09/79 6* 0.150 31.2
7/21/79 6* 0.130 8.0
8/15/80 6* 0.128 5.2
Flourissant, MO #261600001601
6/30/80 6* 0.199 53.9
8/26/80- 6* 0.177 41.9
7/22/79 6* 0.165 38.8
9/11/79- 6* 0.042 0.188 38.5
9/07/80 6* 0.162 37.1
St. Ann, MO #264120001601
9/11/79 6* 0.210 6.9
7/25/80 6* 0.138 18.6
6/30/80 6* 0.137 16.1
7/17/81 6* 0.133 8.7
7/22/79 6* 0.133 6.5
Queeny Park, MO #264300006601
7/10/79 6* 0.175 45.5
'19/80 6* 0.152 31.3
./22/79 6* 0.146 24.1
9/11/79 6* 0.151 23.2
7/17/79 6* 0.139 14.9
Arnold, MO #262280012F01
7/17/81 6* 0.180 48.9
7/10/81 6* 0.140 27.5
West Alton, MO #264160002F01
8/27/80 6* 0.162 34.3
7/11/81 6* 0.148 32.5
5/18/79 6* 0.153 29.8
5/28/81 6* 0.151 27.7
7/03/79 6* 0.145 24.6
Wentzvllle, MO #264160008005
4/21/80 6* 0.161 28.6
7/17/80 6* 0.144 21.4
7/18/80 6* 0.127 2.9
St. Louis, MO #264280063H01
7/08/79 6* 0.147 26.3
8/09/80 6* 0.143 25.6
7/21/79 6* 0.143 21.0
- continued on next page -
-------
Alton, IL #140160006F01
7/14/80 6*
8/25/80 6*
8/27/80 6*
9/10/79 6*
7/25/80 6*
Edwardsville,
8/09/80
7/19/80
7/25/80
6/30/80
9/11/79
IL #144680007F01
6*
6*
6*
6*
6*
Maryvtlle.
7/19/80
9/06/80
7/16/80
7/25/80
IL #144680008F01
6*
6*
6*
6*
Wood River, IL #148520007F01
6/30/80
7/14/80
8/27/80
8/09/80
7/19/80
6*
6*
6*
6*
6*
Waterloo, IL #147960001F03
7/11/80
7/13/80
7/10/80
7/02/80
6*
6*
6*
6*
East St. Louis, IL #14212001OF01
7/19/80
6/18/80
7/13/80
8/09/80
6/30/80
6*
6*
6*
6*
6*
0.141
0.136
0.134
0.134
0.129
0.170
0.153
0.148
0.142
0.141
0.142
0.135
0.129
0.127
0.140
0.142
0.141
0.132
0.133
0.128
0.128
0.128
0.126
0.143
0.134
0.132
0.129
0.125
19.8
13.2
15.0
11.8
6.5
35.5
31.4
28.5
17.4
12.5
15.4
13.2
5.3
4.5
18.4
15.5
13.9
12.1
8.2
4.5
5.1
5.9
1.9
23.2
14.1
5.3
1.9
***
-------
2.8 Region VIII
Denver, CO
Salt Lake City, UT
to
o.
t/1
01
O)
to
o
Ol
2
in
10
as.
o
-------
CITY: Denver
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(s): Colorado
REGION: VIII
COUNTIES: Boulder, Adams, Jefferson, Douglas. Arapahoe and Denver
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Colorado Department of Health; Denver Regional Council of Governments
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS IHVEHTOBXED: KHC. NO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR: 1976 (a)
1/82
Oj ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION: 1.424.657 (1976)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHIGHWAY 5/28/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
tons/day
1,876.600 (1987)
202.8
Point
(16X)
169.9
^-
149.2
Highway
(7«)
V Ai
\ (1
^
\^ \
\\
\V
\'
\
•ea Point
LOZ) (30Z)
^
k 109. 9_/ ^^ 109.9
F
77.0
Area
60.1
Highway
(55Z)
_.
Base Baseline SI
Year Projection Pi
1976 1987 (b)
t
77.0
Area
60.1
Highway
(55Z)
P Strategy
rejection
1987 (b)
NITROGEN OXIDES
tons/day
262.2 262.2
247.0 --
Point
(63Z)
90.3 x
W
77.9
Highway
(32Z)
Area
(5Z)
{^
Base I
Year Pi
Point
(60Z)
105.6
86.2
Highway
(33Z)
Area
(7Z)
j
" "I
Point
(60Z)
105.6
86.2
Highway
(33Z)
iaseline SIP Strategy
•ejection Projection
1976 1987 1987
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Point Sources
Nonhighway Area
Highway
TOTAL
Base Year
VOC
21.0
13.2
95.2
129.4
NO,
100.0
7.9
49.7
157.6
Baseline Projection
voc-
15.9
8.2
29.1
53.2
NO, .
75.8
9.4
41.8
127.0
SIP Projection Total Z Change (i
VOC
15.9
8.2
29.1
53.2
NO,
73.8
9.4
41.8
127.0
VOC
0
-18
-60
-46
NO,
0
+56
+11
+ 6
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 17 NO* 21
COMMENTS; (a) 1976 data base developed for use with Urban Airshed Model, (b) Cannot determine if
1987 inventory la baseline or SIP strategy. Controls in SIP include RACT I.II. all 100* TPY VOC
sources, I/M, and TCMs. (c) Calculated percent change is for total emissions, not per capita.
-------
Non-attainment area Denver, CO
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years:
1975 & 1976
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/Ntt
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/US. If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/HS; 1f Yes. date
6/80
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
Denvtr, CO
POLUITMT
Omit-
MKMD 1
062210001 F01
SITE 10
E. Tat* Int. 4 StMl St.
Cin/OUin
Ullbj/
AdM
STATE
CO
SITE
TYPE
UK
ST*TIW TYPE
Mturbn/
lodintrul
ttAIUUlE
MTA
7M1
pftoac
NT. (•)
*
DISTANCE
TON CC
(km)
10 m
DISTANCE
FMM DO
fml
17
TMfFIC
ADT
soo
OTHEH;
DIM dltl UllKUd
-------
Non-attainment area Denver, CO
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used:
SAI - Urban Airshed
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/fl&; if Yes, date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
3/1/82
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/ONO; if Yes, date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
3/1/82
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/M6; if Yes, date
6/80
Site-Days
Modeled
NMOC/NOX
Ratio(s)
Transported
03 Concen-
tration(ppm)
Peak 03
Concentration
(pptn)
Wei by - #062210001F01
7/28/76 NA 0.04 0.171*
[Note: Above based on preliminary modeling done prior to 10/78]
Highest Site (not identified)
based on measurements
7/28/76
8/03/76
7/29/75
model
measured - estimated
0.18
0.17
0.11
Q.15
Q.14
0.13
Calculated
* HC Control
54
Modeled Peak Estimated Anywhere in Area
7/29/75
8/03/76
7/28/76
0,22
0.21
0.18
*Design value used in modeling for Denver based on this being second highest
ozone concentration measured in Denver area in 1976.
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 54_
o Remarks: NA = Not applicable for model used
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Salt Lake City STATE(s):
COUNTIES: Salt Lake and Davis
Utah
REGION: VIII
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Utah Pep
;t of Health - Honhighvay
Wasatch Front Regional Council. Dtah Department of Transportation - Highway
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
"POLLUTANTS 'INVENTORIED: NMHC. NO.
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR:
2/82
1980
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1984 (a)
POPULATION: 766.000 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHIGHUAY 6/9/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
873.000 (1987)
142,153
^
116.608
Area
(28Z)
77.220
Highway
(54Z)
Base
Year
1980
Foil
r'ds:
\
\
^ \
^ \
\
\
V
\
1
it
O
78.898
•+-
71.784
36,516
Highway
(46Z)
Baseline
•rejection
1987 (I
Point
(9Z)
JL
_j_\__.
,(45Z).
SI!
i Pi
>)
78,898
-*
71,784
36,516
Highway
(46Z)
> Strategy
•ojectlon
1987 (c)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
Base
Year
1980
Baseline
Projection
1987
122,963 122.963
112,697 _--
Point
(30Z)
78.515
Area
(2SZ)
50.110
Highway
(45Z)
Point
(31Z)
86.636
Area
(25Z)
53,380
Highway
(44Z)
Point
(312)
86,636
Area
(25Z)
53.380
Highway
(44Z)
SIP Strategy
Projection
1987
Inventory
Pollutants
VOC
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(d)
VOC
HO.
NO,
VOC
NO,
VOC
NO,
Point Sources 33.4 44.6 8.2 43.9 8.2 43.9 -72
Nonhlghway Area 51.4 37.1 40.4 35.8 40.4 35.8 -10
Highway ' 100.8 65.4 41.8 61.2 41.8 61.2 -53
TOTAL 185.6 147.1 90.4 140.9 90.4 140.9 -45
+12
+10
+ 7
+ 9
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 8 NO, 11
COMMENTS; (a) Attainment would be projected for December 1. 1983 if I/M were implemented.
(b) I/M included in baseline calculation, (e) Controls include RACT I.II. I/M. and TCMs.
(d) Calculated percent change is for total emissions, not emissions per capita.
-------
Non-attainment area Salt Lake City, UT
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979. 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/Ktt
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/Ma. If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/NB; 1f Yes, date 12/23/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used 1n SIP analysis.)
ttn-Aluinmt Am
Sill Like City. UT
POLLUTMT
IMC/IWi
mac/mi
taau
Ozont
SAUUO «
46092001 OPOS
4MZ2ooa3P(&
4MKOMIFOI
«6006000IF01
SITE ID
Dmruiu Mlflllgn
ISO (lit South I«plt
Atkinson Silo
NMlth Owrant tltfg
610 South 2nd Cut
Iwntlful
cm/caurrv
SiU lite City/
Silt UU
kortft Salt UU/
0»1i
Silt Ukt City/
Silt Ukt
Bountiful/
Onli
sine
UT
UT
UT
UT
SITE
HPE
MNS
•MB
STATIN TYPE
cnur city/
ninl/
Induitrlil
ctnttr city/
IM«lllil
cmur city/
AVAIlAolI
DATA
•1
II
7941
7M1
PROBE
HI. (•)
4
4
e
4
DISTANCE
FMN CC
(knl
2 m
6 M
CC
14 II
FMM RO.
f«t
44
1Z7
TRAFFIC
AST
9500
IOUO
OTHE«-
HtlKt (UU collKUd it
moo «
-------
Non-attainment area Salt Lake City. UT
o Modeling Status
Model used:
MODELING
City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/UK; if Yes, date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS No
3/82
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/to; if Yes, date
- Reviewed by:~RO(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
7/82
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/NB; if Yes, date
unknown
Transported
Site-Days
Modeled
Salt Lake
7/22/80
7/16/80
7/18/80
6/28/80
6/28/79
Bountiful
8/11/80
6/28/79
7/22/81
7/28/81
7/28/80
NMOC/NOX 03 Concen-
Ratio(s) tration(ppm)
City, UT #460920001 F01
9
9
9
9
9
, UT #460060001 F01
9
9
9
9
9
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.182
0.169
0.171
0.155
0.149
0.178
0.190
0.163
0.155
0.164
Calculated
X HC Control
47
39
34
29
14
38
36
35
24
20
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS
Remarks:
29
-------
2.9 Region IX
Fresno, CA
Los Angeles -
South Coast Basin, CA
Sacramento, CA
San Diego, CA
San Franc-isco - Bay Area
Air Quality Management District, CA
Ventura/Oxnard, CA
a.
f—I
l/l
en
c
US
u
d)
l/>
to
-------
CITY: Fresno
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(s): California
REGION: IX
COUNTIES: Fresno County Only
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Fresno Air Pollution Control Division (FAPCP) - Point Sources. CARB -
Area Sources. CALTRANS and Council of Fresno County Covemnents - Highway
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: RHC. NO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR: 1979
1/82
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: (a)
POPULATION: 484.600 (1979)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHIGHWAY 3/5/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
tons/day
591.240 (1987)
NITROGEN OXIDES
tons /day
157.5
Point
(14Z)
136.0
Area
(59Z)
43.1
Highway
(27Z)
s.
X
163.8
Point
(22Z)
128.4
Area
(63Z)
24.4
Highway
(1SZ)
\
\
\ *
\ 0
\ \
\ V
\ V
\
\
int
6Z)
A/96.0
>l
81.1
Area
(65Z)
18.5
Highway
(19Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1979 1987 1987 (b)
89.5
Point
(40Z)
53.7
Area
(26Z)
30.0
Highway
(34Z)
'''
109.2
Point
(52Z)
52.2
Area
<25Z)
24.8
Highway
(23Z)
^--.
100.0
Point
(57Z)
43.0
Area
(23Z)
14.7
Highway
(20Z)
Base
Year
1979
Baseline
Projection
1987
SIP strategy
Projection
1987
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/ca£/day}
Inventory
Point Sources
Nonhighway Area
Highway
Bas
VOC
40.3
174.3
80.9
e Year
NO,
67.2
44.5
' 56.2
Baseline 1
VOC
54.4
160.0
37.3
Projection
NO,
87.6
42.1
38.1
SIP ProJ
VOC
22.9
96.3
28.4
lection 1
NO,
87.6
35.8-
30.3
rotai z
VOC
-31
-33
-57
cnangei
NO,,
+59
- 2
-34
TOTAL
295.5
167.9
251.9
167.8
147.6
153.7 -39
+12
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC _6 NO* 8_
COMMENTS: (a) Attainment not demonstrated by 1987. (b) Controls include RACT I.II. I/M. TCMs.
other RACT. and control of nonhighway aoblle sources, (c) Calculated percent change is for
total emissions not emissions per capita.
-------
Non-attainment area
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1978. 1979 & 1980
. CA
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/NtX
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/ttfl. If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/MB; if Yes, date
unknown
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
Mn-Atuinenl »rw
POLLU1W1!
OlOM
OlOM/NOl
T*
OUM/HOi
OlOM
Oim
SUOAD I
052UOB1 roi
DHSODOK roi
052800210 101
052800241 101
052820009 101
SITE ID
SUM. St.
1250 E. Olln
S704 E. hilltr
Sh» t Hull
Olnty Crttt H.
cm/count
FtraUMD/Fnim
Fnra/Frauo
Frtcno/Fmno
FrMOo/Fnue
Shixr liti/
Fmoo
STATE
(A
CA
CA
CA
-
4ITE
TIK
suns
suns
NAKS
IAFS
SUMS
STATION TtPE
rank
udurMii/
COMN
HiturMn/
nilonllil
uourMn/
r»l«ntt»l
wmau
MTA
71-80
78-80
78-80
76-80
78-80
HT. (.)
4
t
1
no* cc
M
ec
cc
cc
CO
FKH RO
21
SIO
2M
ADT
15000
1200
20000
OTHM
HIM (UU COllMtM <1 .
td«kt UU In*
. 0*0 for Mdillag.
. o*d for Bailing.
-------
Non-attainment area
ra
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/Kg; if Yes, date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS NJL
unknown
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/Dfa; if Yes, date unknown
T Reviewed by:. R0(s) Yes (1/82) OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/Dta; if Yes, date unknown
Site -Days
Modeled
Firebaugh,
10/01/79
8/01/79
7/20/79
7/17/79
7/24/79
10/2/79
10/4/79
Fresno, CA
7/17/79
9/14/80
7/25/80
7/24/79
7/27/80
Fresno, CA
10/2/80
7/25/80
8/02/78
10/1/80
7/25/80
NMOC/NOx
Ratio(s)
CA #052630001 F01
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
9.5
4052800005F01
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
9.3
#052800024F01
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
Transported
03 Concen-
tration(ppm)
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.14
0.14
0.14
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.17
0.17
0.16
0.17
0.15
0.20
0.18
0.18
0.17
0.19
Calculated
% HC Control
35
22
15
12
12
9
7
59
58
56
55
46
75
69
66
59
48
- continued on next page -
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS
70*
Remarks: *Closer examination of assumptions concerning transported ozone and
prevailing NMOC/NOx ratios for design day may be warranted. Any change in thesv
assumptions could alter % HC control needed.
-------
Fresno, CA #052800241101
7/24/80 16.8 0.21 79
10/4/78 16.8 0.18 73
9/13/79 16.8 0.18 71
8/03/79 16.8 0.15 0.18 70
10/12/78 16.8 0.18 70
Shaver Lake, CA #052820003101
8/03/79 11.4 0.15 47
7/31/79 11.4 0.14 21
8/02/78 11.4 0.13 10
9/04/80 11.4 0.13 9
-7/24/78- -11-. 4- 0.13 7
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Los Angeles/SCAB STATE(s): California
REGION: IX
COUNTIES: Los Angeles. Orange. Riverside and San Bernardino
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: California A<»- Resource Board. South Coast AQMD - Nonhighway
Southern California Association of Government. CALOtASS - Highway
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: ROCfa). HP, BASE YEAR: 1979
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE: 1/82
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR:
(b)
POPULATION: 11.600.000 (1979)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: • NONHIGHWAY 3/5/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82 12.800.000 (1987)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (c)
tone/day
NITROGEN OXIDES (e)
tons/day
1501
Point
(19Z)
1220
Area
(31Z)
751
Point
(50Z)
V
\
\
\\
\ \
\
\
\
\
X
\
963
-fr
743
Area
(37Z)
388
Highway
(40Z)
I
/
(233
K
v
N
•«*
>olnt
;>/
(18Z)
1'"
V
613
Area
(43Z)
291
Highway
(39Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1979 1987 (d) 1987 (e)
1237
Point
<26Z)
914
Area *4
723
Highway
(59Z)
\
\
\
\
(15Z)
*•"
\
v \
.>
(18Z)
Base 1
Year Pi
1979
944
Point
(31Z)
654
Area
*T 479
Highway
(5«).
PC
(1
N
N
V
N
(20Z?S
*" — «.
tint
9Z)
\ 720
•*
579
Area
" 436
Highway
(61Z)
iaseline SIP Strategy
rejection Projection
1987 1987 (e)
Inventory
Pollutants
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(f)
VOC V^ VOC NOj VOC NO, VOC NO,
Point Sources 22.0 25.3
Nonhighway Area 36.8 15.0
Highway 58.8 56.7
TOTAL 117.6 97.0
15.6
25.2
27.6
68.4
20.6
12.4
34.0
67.0
9.7
22.9
20.7
53.3
10.0
10.2
31.0
51.2
-52
-31
-61
-50
-56
-25
-40
-42
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 280 NO, 95
COMMENTS: (a) Includes 1.7Z (wt.) ethane, (b) Attainment not projected, (c) Point/area splits
estimated by EPA (MDAP) from review of source categories in summary tables, '(d) Could net be
determined if baseline includes I/M credits, (e) Controls Include RACT I.II. I/M. TQte. other
RACT. and NO. emission reduction, (f) Calculated percent change is for total emissions, net
emissions per capita. ^______—__ .
-------
Non-attainment area Los Angeles/San Bernardino.
CA
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1978. 1979 & 1980 (1981 data will be addressed by State
in a later submittal.)
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/F
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/Kg. If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/KB; if Yes. date
unknown
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
m-Atutn
Lot Anotll
pouurwr
O»ne/H0i
atom/no*
Onnt/HOi
Ouw/NOji
THC
Onme/Kfti
THC
OtOM
Orone/Uh
THC
Omit/Mi
THC
Oim/M»
THC
Oun*
Onm/Mli
OnM/KOi
THC
Ozont
•fit Am
s/S«n CcrMrdlno,
SAIOAD 1
MOM0002IOI
OSOH0002I01
OSZtSOOOllOl
M512DWIU1
OM7MOMIOI
OiiaZOOOTIOI
0560*0001101
OSMODOJF01
IH6WOOOI101
OU700DOSI01
M7t80001101
9S8440004F01
OSS160002IOI
CA
SITE ID
801 Loiwi An.
228 H. (•>!•
1483S fOOOllll tlM.
24811 Stn Ftrwda Rd.
11*6 E. mint St.
1711 S. bbrtcl M*.
Kl ». Strtf tut.
1450 PMU. *M.
172 K. 3« St.
24171 Lite Dr.
22M1 SHU CH>n U.
1350 S. 8tnurd1w Rd.
IB Unjr FlMt AMI. Cir.
ciTT/courrr
Aniu/
Lot AngtlM
BurUn*/
LOI Ang»l«I
Fenun/
lot Anftlrt
NnMll/
U» Angtln
PlUMM/
Pin Mwt/
Ln Aigtla
Pom/
10) Angtld
•Innldt/
Rlwraltft
S» MmirtlBO/
St. 8m*rd
Uki Cnowy/
SI. Itntrd
Suu AM/
Drum
St. Swmrt
N01XO/
•innldt
STATI
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
a
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
CA
SHE
TTK
SUMS
SUNS
NANS
SUMS
MRS
sum
SUB
SUNS
sun
SUNS
SUNS
SUNS
STATION TVPE
ubarbM/
iMvttrltl
wtairbM/
Imkii trill
niril/
Indui trill
Wbirbn/
CDK>rc<«1
e1tj nnttr/
cOBOrctil
trtUTBM/
mlddttol
•uburHB/
Ct>BMCl4l
rani/
•trlcvltiiral
city cnur/
CMHTCU1
ruril/ntJr
urbn
nml/
•grlultural
city eonur/
wburtxn/
miatntui
A¥AliA8U
DATA
78-81
74-81
74-81
78-81
78-81
78-81
78-81
78-81
78-81
78-81
78-81
78-81
78-81
PR08E
HT. (.)
S
S
(
8
*
4
7
FMH CC
48
27
N
$2
35
ZS
SS
110
110
125
45
6S
FUN U
'*'
12
23$
21
75
25
24
APT
1000
12000
20! 50
8000
40000
6000
Hind Mb celltcud it.
HIM oiu f nm
lor (Bail «ng.
Nlilng n»l«ht UU fr» .
-------
Non-attainment area Los Angeles/San Bernardino.
CA
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used:
City-Specific EKMA
Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/tiff; if Yes, date
Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS No
11/81
Final Modeling Completed? Yes/tiff; 1f Yes, date unknown
Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/Nfl; if Yes, date
11/81
Site-Days
Modeled
NMOC/NOv
Ratio(s)
Transported
03 Concen-
tration(ppm)
Azusa, CA #05050002101
9/30/80
6/23/78
7/18/79
Burbank, CA #050900002101
6/27/80
Fontana, CA #052680001101
9/12/79
9/18/79
10/02/80
6/08/78
Newhall, CA #055120001101
10/03/80
Pasadena, CA #055760004101
9/10/79
9/11/79
6/27/79
7/14/78 10.3
9/19/79
9/30/80
0.21
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.41
0.40
0.40
0.35
0.42
0.42
0.42
0.36
0.36
0.44
0.44
0.43
0.42
0.42
0.41
- continued on next page -
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS
85*
Calculated
* HC Control
85*
o Remarks: *Design control value based on information in draft SIP. Not known if
control value is 4th highest for site.
-------
Pico Rivera, CA #055820001101
9/29/78 0.43
9/28/78 0.39
9/26/78 0.36
Pomona, CA #056040001101
7/13/78 0.41
10/13/78 0.39
Riverside,-CA _ #056400003F01
9/29/80 0.37
San Bernardino, CA #056680001101
7/22/80 0.36
7/16/80 -- 0.35
Lake Gregory, CA #056700005101
6/11/79 0.35
Santa Ana, CA #057180001101
6/12/79 0.35
,pland, CA #058440004F01
10/08/80 0.38
Norco-Prado Park, CA #055160002101
5/12/78 0.40
-------
CITY: Sacramento
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(B): California
REGION:
IX
COUNTIES: Placer, Sacramento, Solano, Sutter, Yolo
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: California Air Resources Board - Nonhighway
Sacramento Council of Governments, CALTRANS - Highway
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: RHC. HO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR: 1979
1/82
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: (a)
POPULATION: 973.400 Q979)(b)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHICHWAY 3/5/82 HIGHWAY 11/1/82 1.069.000 (1987)(c)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (d)
tens/day
111.9
*4r~
96.3
Area
(27Z)
66.1
Highway
(59Z)
Poll
nu;
\
^ \
\ \
\ x
\
^ \
\ '
\
\
\
it
»
70.3
J^
S3.0
Area
<40Z>
24.6
Highway
(35Z)
Point
(25Z)
A
70.3
H
53.0
Area
<40Z>
24.6
Highway
(35Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1979 1987 1987 (e)
NITROGEN OXIDES (d)
tone/day
112.0 Polnt(SZ) Point
4-
106.4
Area
85.0
Highway
(76Z)
*-^-/ (5Z>
^/*x 96.1 l\ 96.1
(19Z)
V
\
\
X
Base 1
Year ' Pi
1979
^
91.5
Area
(28Z)
64.2
Highway
(67Z)
*•
91.5
Area
(28t)
64.2
Highway
(67Z)
laseline SIP Strategy
•ejection Projection
1987 1987
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Point Sources
Nonhighway Area
Highway
TOTAL
Base
VOC
14.6
28.2
61.7
104.5
Year
NO,-
5.2
20.0
79.4
104.6
Baseline Projection
VOC NO*
14.7
24.2
20.9
59.8
3.9
23.2
54.6
81.7
SIP Projection Total Z Change (i
VOC
14.7
24.2
20.9
59.8
NO*
3.9
23.2
54.6
81.7
VOC
+11
- 6
-63
-37
NO,
-18
+28
-24
-14
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TRY): VOC (g) NO, (g)
COMMENTS: (a) Attainment not projected, (b) 1979 population extrapolated from 1985 data in SIP
and 1980 census, (e) Interpolated between 1985 and 2000 populations, (d) Limited documentation
for stationary source portion of inventory, (e) Controls include I/M. seme RACT. TCMs. (f) Cal-
culated percent change is for total emissions, not emissions per capita, (g) Listing of major
VOC/NO* emitting facilities not submitted.
-------
Non-attainment area Sacramento. CA
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1978. 1979 & 1980 (State does not intend to evaluate the
effect of 1981 air quality data on control strategy)
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/Ho"
Are all data entered in SAROAD? ESS/No. If No, what is missing? Data from
1978, 1979 & 1980 missing for some sites.
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/MS; if Yes, date
unknown
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
•on-AtuloM Arn
c>. C«
PDUUIMI
DIM
OlOM
Onnc
Onno
Oim
SAKMD f
wuToooiroi
OUUOD01F01
OS51SDMH01
OM4 054)0101
owwoMiioi
SITE ID
7400 Svnrlu »>«.
City Coro Urt
I8B 8l«k Foot M/
SOOOBocklln Rd.
Cntksldo Scftool
cm/dunT
Cttnit H»1«lrti/
Sicraonto
FollOD/
Stcnomto
1. HlejilMd/
SICT«
-------
Non-attainment area Sacramento. CA
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: SMOG in final modeling (EKMA used in preliminary modeling)
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/K&; if Yes, date unknown
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS No
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/Nfl; 1f Yes, date unknown
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/M8; if Yes, date unknown
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOv 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio(s) tration(ppm) (ppm) % HC Control
Sacramento, CA #056600001101
7/21/78* ** ** 0.22 50
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 50_
o Remarks: *0nly this day modeled using SMOG to calulate control requirements.
Several site-days considered in preliminary modeling using EKMA. **No other
details about inputs to the SMOG model provided.
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: San Diego STATE(fl): California
COUNTIES: San Diego County
REGION:
IX
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: San Diego Air Pollution Control Division (AFC) - nonhighway
CALTRANS - highway
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SPMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: RVOC. HO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE TEAR: 1978
8/81
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION: 1.690.000 (1978)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHICHWAY 2/111'Si HIGHWAY 11/1/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
tons/day
2.170.000 (1987)
305.5
«-
252.0
Area
<34Z)
148.2
Highway
<48Z)
VPoint
\O8J
\
^ \
N \
\
\
\
\
\
i)
222.2
Jf
183.5
Area
<49Z)
74.9
Higttw&y
(34Z)
71
(17Z)
r< <
>k
»* "*
^
^
*
»*
«*> .
Lnt
22)
\ 186.2
*
163.7
Area
(56Z)
60.2
Highway
(32Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1978 1987 (a) 1987 (a.b
NITROGEN OXIDES
tons/day
192.7
•*
158.7
Area
133.0
Highway
(69Z)
Point
U8Z]
W
\
V N
•x <
X
X
X
(13Z)
Pod
/
(15Z)
/ (
143.8V
3f
121.9
Area
91.8
Highway
(64Z)
*• ^ """"'•
<21Z)
(20Z)
nt
L7Z)
Ll32.6
110.7
Area
84. 0
Highway
(63Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1978 1987 1987 (b)
Inventory
Pollutants
VOC
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection • SIP Projection Total Z Change(c)
VOC
HO,
NO.
VOC
NO.
VOC
NO*
Point Sources 23.8 18.3 16.2 9.2 9.4 9.2 -58 -36
Nonhighway Area 55.8 13.8 45.5 12.6 43.4 11.2 0 +3
Highway 79.7 71.5 31.4 38.4 25.2 35.2 -59 -36
TOTAL
164.3
103.6
93.1
60.2
78.0
55.6 -39
-31
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 19 NO, 7_
COMMENTS; (a) Point/area split estimated by EPA (MDAD) for 1987 baseline and SIP strategy
inventories, (b) Controls include RACT I.II. I/M. TCMs. other RACT. nonhighvay mobile source
reductions, and NO, emission reductions, (c) Calculated percent change is for total emissions,
not per capita emissions.
-------
Hon-attainment area San Diego, CA
AIR- QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1978. 1979 & 1980 (1981 data will be addressed in a
later submitTFT
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/MX
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/ffltX. If No, what is missing?
• Accepted by EPA? Yes/M06 If Yes, date
unknown
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
bi-Atu
-------
Non-attainment area San Diego, CA
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: MADCAP
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/MS; if Yes, date 4/20/82
- Reviewed by: R0(s) No OAQPS No
• Final Modeling Completed? m/No; if Yes, date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) In process OAQPS In process
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/N&; if Yes, date unknown
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOX 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio(s) tration(ppm) (ppm) % HC Control
Alpine, CA #056820006101
7/25/78 NA** 0.06*** 0.14 31
7/22/77 NA** 0.07*** 0.18
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS 31*
o Remarks: *EKMA modeling of the same day indicates 47% HC reduction required.
Also, this day had little if any 03 transport from the LA Basin. Additional
documentation needed to verify design day selection (effect of transport from
LA Basin) and to support several input assumptions. **Not applicable to this
modeling analysis. ***Values given for EKMA analysis - not specified for
MADCAP.
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: San Francisco
STATE(s): California
REGION: IX
COUNTIES: Alaneda. Contra Costa, Marin. Sapa. San Francisco. San Mateo. Santa Clara (plus
portions of SaLano and Sonoma counties)
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Bay Area Air Quality Management Division. California Air Resource
Board - Highway; Metropolitan Planning CtngaiBiaon - Highway
EMISSION IHVEMTOHT PAIA SOHKAgy
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: ROC. NO,
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE:
EASE YEAR: 1979
1/62
1987
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR:
POPULATION: 4.982.000 (1979)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHICHWAY 3/5/82 HIGHWAY 11/1/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS (b)
tons/day
5.690.000 (1987)(a)
732
Point
(34Z)
483
Area
<24Z>
310
Highway
(42Z)
V
\
\
\
\
i
V
\
\
\
>
V
\
\
\
486
Point
(362)
310
Area
(33Z)
150
Highway
(31Z)
Pol!
(36:
, \
x^
X
Base Baseline SI]
Year Projection Pi
1979 1987
It
»
\ 430
\
304
Area
(29Z)
150
Highway
(31Z)
' Strategy
•ejection
1987 (c)
NITROGEN OXIDES (b)
cons/day
643
Point
(34Z)
424
Area
(18Z)
310
Point
(48Z)
V
V
\
\
s
\
\
\
V
X
\
\
Base 1
Year Pi
1979
543
Point
(44Z)
304
Area
(22Z)
186
Point
(34Z)
543
Point
(44Z)
304
Area
(22Z)
186
Point
(34Z)
iasellne SIP Strategy
rejection Projection
1987 1987
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Point Sources
Nonhighway Area
Highway
TOTAL
Base
voc
45.4
31.6
56.6
133.6
Year
NO,
40.0
20.8
56.6
117.4
Baseline
VOC
28.1
25.6
24.0
77.7
Projection
NO,
38.2
18.8
29.7
86.7
SIP
VOC
24.6
20.1
24.0
68.7
Projection
NO,
38.2
18.8
29.7
86.7
Total Z
VOC
-38
-27
-52
-41
Change!
NO,
+ 9
+ 4
-40
-16
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 43 NO, 29
COMMENTS; (a) 1987 population interpolated from ABAC '81 projections for 1980 and 1990.
lb) Point/area splits derived from EPA (MDAD) review, (c) Controls include RACT I.II. I/M.
other RACT and area source controls on comereial/censumer solvents, (d) Calculated percent
change is for total emissions, not emissions per capita.
-------
Non-attainment area San Francisco, CA
AIR; QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1978. 1979 & 1980 (1981 data will be addressed by State
in a later submittal.}
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/XKK
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? m/No. If No, what is missing?
Information on sites used for final SIP analysis not yet available.
- Accepted by EPA?
if Yes, date
o Site Descriptions (for sites used 1n SIP analysis.)
Sm fnnclsco. CA
POUUTMT
Omm
SAROAD f
OMZ40DOII01
SITE ID
106 Uitnnltr A«t.
CITY/COUNTY
in Gtlat/
Smu Clira
STATE
CA
SITE
TYPE
NAM
STATION TYPE
cwiur dty
mtdmtUl
AVA1LABU
DATA
79-81
PROBE
NT. (•)
I
FPON CC
^taL
0
FROM ID.
'-'
22
ADI
10000
tftiri diu collKttd it.
»1"4 diu fro.
Hlilng htlght uti In*
. mtd for milling.
r usta for •Ddtling.
-------
Non-attainment area San Francisco. CA
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: LIRAQ
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/US; if Yes, date 4/20/82
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS No
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/Mi; 1f Yes, date unknown
-..Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/Mb; 1f Yes, date unknown
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOy 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio(s) tratlon(ppm) (ppm) % HC Control
Los Gatos, CA #054240001F01
9/25/78 * * 0.23 31
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS
o Remarks: *No other details about Innut^ t.n thp LIRAQ mndpl
-------
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
CITY: Ventura/Oxnard STATE(s): California
COUNTIES: Ventura County - Only
REGION:
IX
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Ventura County Air Pollution Control Division - Point; California
Air Resources Board - Area; CALTRAHS - Highway
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
-POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: ROC(a). HO, BASE YEAR: 1979
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE: 1/82
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR:
(b)
POPULATION: 506.203 (1979)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHIGHWAY 3/11/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82 644.000 (1987)(c)
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
tons/day
102.5
Point
(21Z)
81.0
Area
(46Z)
34.3
Highway
(33Z)
\
\
\
\
\ 68.5
(d)
v
^ 61.9
(d)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1979 1987 1987 (e)
NITROGEN OXIDES
tens/day
96.8
Point
(50Z)
48.9
Area
37.9 •«
Highway
(39Z)
V
\
\
(11Z)
Base
Year Pi
1979
75.7
(d)
X
X
X
N
59.7
(d)
iaseline SIP Strategy
•ejection Projection
1987 1987
TOTAL AOCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Point Sources
Nonhighway Area
Highway
TOTAL
Base
VOC
38.7
84.1
61.7
184.5
Year
NO,
86.4
19.6
68.2
174.2
Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change!
VOC NO, VOC NO, VOC NO,
(d) (d) (d)
96.6 106.7 87.3 84.2 -40 -38
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC (g) NO, (g)
COMMENTS: (a) ROC includes ethane, (b) Attainment by '87 not demonstrated, (c) Extrapolated
to 1987 from 1983 and 1985 population data, (d) Breakdown of emissions Into specified categories
not readily available from summary tables, (e) Controls Include RACT I.II. I/M. TCMs. some RACT
III. NO, source control, and other miscellaneous VOC controls, (f) Calculated percent change
is for total emissions, not emissions per capita, (g) No listing of major VOC/NO. facilities.
-------
Non-attainment area Ventura-Oxnard. CA
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
• Base Years:
1979, 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/Kta
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? Yes/MS. If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/KB; if Yes, date unknown
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
non-Minn
tauiTwr
toon*
Onm
Oim
Ount
Oim
OlOM
Oim
•ml tint
SAUM 1
ossMoaai IDI
055560001 10*
osuMoai 101
aswaoai 101
OSB240001 101
OSMMOB 101
csesooooi ioi
sin u
>OI Slgwl Hill
MS tatrtl AM.
MM) C1>1I Cng. Ut.
MWCKWW St.
ll» Mlitfiaro Or.
SMI<* Tr. St. *
Flqurw Si.
15$ I. Mia
cin/cowTT
Q)Mi/«Ml»ri
Cl MoflfcMiin
f»rt HMMM
SM. Ullty
Tbouund Oiki
«wun/>i>n. Cl
Mni/VMtan
n»n
u
«
M
u
u
u
«
lYPt
SUM
MIS
SUNS
HMB
sun
sum
STATIC* Tlft
c*m*r till/
OBirclal
ninl/
•grleultunl
ronu
luUirtw/
mMntul
wturMn/
mtdntul
WtyrMn/
oftlU
nmiy
•grlciilbiril
MIA
;»4o
!MI
»-BI
)MI
;»-8i
7MI
Ml. (•)
«
6
WH CC
_IiBl_
n
17
i«
IS
8
40
FROM «D.
IIS
1U
AOT
MOO
1000
OTHtR.
dloa ou ollKUd at,
Hlid ttu Inm
miln« httgkt diU Inm
. imd for
. «M4 for
-------
Non-attainment area Ventura-Qxnard.
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used:
City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/MKX; if Yes, date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS NO
unknown
-^-.F1nal..Mode.l1.ng.Completed? Yes/fltX; 1f Yes, date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes(1/82) OAQPS • Yes
11/81
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes MX; if Yes, date
11/81
Site-Days
Modeled
NMOC/NOv
Ratio(s)
Transported
03 Concen-
tration(ppm)
0.09
Ojai, CA #055340001101 (Ojai Valley)
8/11/80
9/18/81
8/12/80
7/25/80
7/26/80
8/10/80
7/17/79
8/09/80
9/20/79
3/08/79
9/11/79
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
El Rio, CA #055560001101
9/16/79
9/11/79
9/15/79
6/18/81
8/05/79
9/06/79
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.18
0.20
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.18
0.18
0.17
0.17
0.18
0.23
0.17
0.17
0.16
0.15
0.15
Calculated
% HC Control
42
- continued on next page -
n % HC Control Needed To Attain 03 NAAQS
42 Ojai Valley Portion
48 Qxnard Plain Portion
Remarks: *NMOC/NOx ratio of 9.5 used for the entire Ventura-Oxnard
-------
Port Hueneme, CA #056080001F01
6/09/79
9/06/79
2/11/79
9/11/79
10/2/80
Simi Valley,
8/05/79
7/18/81
6/18/81
7/31/79
9/20/79
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
CA #057670001101 (Oxnard Plain)
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5* 0.09
9.5*
Thousand
10/2/80
9/12/79
6/27/80
9/14/79
10/3/80
9/11/79
2/08/79
Ventura >
6/04/81
4/29/81
4/13/80
10/2/80
11/3/80
Piru, CA
6/05/81
9/11/79
10/2/80
6/29/81
8/09/80
10/3/80
9/18/81
7/17/79
6/18/81
6/27/81
Oaks, CA #058240001101
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
CA #058490002101
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
#058500001 101
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
9.5*
0.19
0.15
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.19
0.23
0.20
0.19
0.19
0.19
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.18
0.17
0.15
0.14
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.19
0.22
0.21
0.18
0.18
0.19
0.18
0.18
0.18
0.18
48
-------
2.10 Region X
Portland, OR/Vancouver, WA
Seattle, WA
O)
c
OJ
o
S
£
o
o
LU
oc
o
-------
CITY: Portland
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(s): Oregon/Washington
REGION:
COUNTIES: OR - Clackanas. Multnomah, Washington; HA - Clark.
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality - Nonhighway (Oregon)
Clark County RFC - Nonhighway (Washington), Portland Metropolitan Service District- Highway
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC. NO, BASE YEAR: 1980
DATE RECEIVED BY REGIONAL OFFICE: OR- 1/82; HA- ft/8
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 1987
POPULATION: 1.245.020 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NORHIGHHAY: OR- 3/21
HA- 6/23
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
HIGHWAY OR- 7/23
WA- 11/1
1.410.670 (1987)
198,430
Point
(26Z)
147.395
Area
(30Z)
88.260
Highway
(44Z)
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
N
145,130 145.130
Point
<27Z)
105,605
Area
(40Z)
47.770
Highway
(33Z)
Point
(27Z)
105.605
Area
(40Z)
47.770
Highway
(33Z)
Base Baseline SIP Strategy
Year Projection Projection
1980 1987 (b) 1987 (c)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
Nonhighway (a)
Nonhighway (a)
118.103 A 118,103
Nonnig
124.179 /
(32Z)
85.040
Highway
(68Z)
118.103 A 118.103
<3«^-> \l C38Z)
72.720
Highway
(62Z)
Base
Year
1980
Baseline
Projection
1987
(38Z)
72.720
Highway
(62Z)
SIP Strategy
Projection
1987
Inventory
Pollutants
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Base Year Baseline Projection SIP Projection Total Z Change(d)
VOC NO, VOC NO. VOC NO. VOC NO,
Point Sources 41.0 31.4<«> 28.0 32.2<*> 28.0 32 »<•> "23
Nonhighway Area 47.5 41.0 41.0 - 2
Highway 70.9 68.3 33.9 51.5 33.9 51.5 -46
-15
TOTAL
159.4
99.7
102.9
83.7
102.9
83.7
-27
- 5
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 32 NO, (e)
COMMENTS: (a) NO, inventory has no breakdown by point and area nonhighway sources. Summaries
include all nonhighway sources, (b) I/M program included in baseline projection for OR only.
(c) No additional controls for '87. Includes RACT I,II. TCMs. I/M (OR only), (d) Calculated
percent change for total emissions, not per capita emissions, (e) Ho listing of sources
emitting >250kg/year of NO,.
-------
Non-attainment area Portland, OR/HA _
AIR QUALITY
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979. 1980 & 1981 _
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/NB
- Are all data entered in SAROAD?
Clark site is not in SAROAD
. If No, what is missing?
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/KB; if Yes, date
7/09/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
Non-Alumni kru
•ortlind. M
POLLUTANT
HOC/ NO.
Dim
MMM 1
Hal In SAKMD
380260004F03
SITl ID
CUrk Sctnol
brat
CITT/COUHTT
PDitUndV
MlltlMMll
C* nil/Click <•»
STATE
OR
OR
SITE
TtPE
MIS
STATIOH TTPt
Uburtun/
mldenttal
ruril/
itrlullural
AVAILABLE
DATA
7441
7941
PROBE
KT !•)
4
4
FMM CC
(km)
29
FROM DO.
fml
46
9
ADI
SO- 60
900
OTMCR
Mind dtu cellKUd it S««ir«l tlut «i* it lecil «lrportl
mad d>U Inm F«nnl tuintna
Ml«bt diU fna ttlm. Ormon ma Sounding!
,>Md for KdoltDg.
. iiud for Bdtllng.
-------
Non-attainment area Portland, OR/WA
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used:
City-Specific EKMA
Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/SK; if Yes, date 11/20/81. report date
Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS No
Final Modeling Completed? Yes/tiff; 1f Yes, date unknown
Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/BBC; if Yes, date
unknown
Site-Days
Modeled
NMOC/NOv
Ratio(s)
Carus, OR #380260004F03
8/11/81 6.8
8/07/81
8/06/81
8/08/81
8/18/81
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
Transported
03 Concen-
tration(ppm)
0.06
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
Peak 03
Concentration
(ppm)
0.216
0.142
0.146
0.126
0.124
Calculated
% HC Control
48*
29*
26*
o
o
% HC Control Needed To Attain 0- NAAQS 2S*
Remarks: *Due to deficiencies in Oregon's modeling approach and selection of
control requirement, the Region has done some additional EKMA runs which have
resulted in % HC control values which differ from those listed here. The Region's
modeling exercise indicates 9.5% VOC control. However, the State still intends
to use the 26% value which it calculated.
-------
CITY: Seattle
1982 OZONE SIP DATA BASE SUMMARY
STATE(s): Washington
REGION:
COUNTIES: Pierce. Snohomlsh, King
RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES: Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency - Honhlghway
EMISSION INVENTORY DATA SUMMARY
POLLUTANTS INVENTORIED: VOC. NO,
DATE RECEIVED B? REGIONAL OFFICE:
BASE YEAR: 1980
4/82
03 ATTAINMENT YEAR: 198*
POPULATION: 2,033,000 (1980)
REVIEW COMPLETION DATES: NONHICWAY 6/2/82 HIGHWAY 7/23/82
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS
kg/day
2.316.000 (1987)(a)
356.999
4f
307.056
Area
(432)
156.878
Highway
(44t)
\ Polr
T(13J
\
V \
\\
\\
N
s,
\
N
N
It
:>
225.689
^—
204.029
Area
(521)
87.036
Highway
(38Z)
Point
(10Z)
i
225,689
-^
204,029
Area
(S2Z)
87,036
Highway
(38Z)
NITROGEN OXIDES
kg/day
Point
(8Z)
191,970,
f-
175,575
Area
142,000
Highway
(74Z)
Point
(10Z)
A
^•^^ 163,234,
* —. „
U8Z>
^
Base I
Year Fi
•^
147,625
Area
111,700
Highway
(68Z)
f \ 163.264
^^
(22Z)
-*•
147.625
Area
111,700
Highway
(68Z)
iaseline SIP Strategy
-ejection Projection
1980 1987 (1987)
Base
Year
1980 (b)
Baseline SIP Strategy
Projection Projection
1987 1987 (c)
Base Baseline
Year Projection
'1980 1987
SIP Strategy
Projection
(1987)
TOTAL AQCR EMISSIONS NORMALIZED BY POPULATION (g/cap/day)
Inventory
Pollutants
Point Sources
Honhighway Area
Highway
TOTAL
Base
VOC
22.1
76.3
77.2
175.6
Year
NO,
7.7
16.5
69.8
94.0
Baseline
VOC
9.3
50.5
37.6
97.4
Projection
NO*
6.8
15.5
48.2
70.5
SIP Projection
VOC
9.3
50.5
37.6
97.4
NO*
6.8
15.5
48.2
70.5
Total Z
VOC
-51
-25
-45
-37
Change(d)
NO,
0
+ 7
-21
-15
Number of Facilities Greater than 250 kg/day (100 TPY): VOC 34 NO* 12
COMMENTS: (a) Interpolated fron 1980 and 1990 population data, (b) Base year enisalons from
highway vehicles interpolated by EPA (MDAD) from 1977 and 1982 estimates, (c) Controls Include
RACT I - III, I/M. TCMs and RACT on 100+TFY aonRACT sources, (d) Calculated percent change for
total emissions net eialsslons per capita.
-------
Non-attainment area
AIR QUALITY
Caattli
tlA
o Air Quality Data Base - Status
- Base Years: 1979. 1980 & 1981
- Have all data been edited by ROs and verified by State/local Agency(ies)?
Yes/No
- Are all data entered in SAROAD? XSiS/No. If No, what is missing? All modeled
data from Graham and some NMOC & NOx from other modeled sites.
- Accepted by EPA? Yes/M8; if Yes, date
7/09/82
o Site Descriptions (for sites used in SIP analysis.)
MA-MUtmlt *rc<
W.LU1MI!
IMC/MI
fern
Onnt
Onn*
SMW) »
49IB400U FOI
4MM0010 FOI
4giMOOM FOI
Not In IMMB
492100001 101
SITE ID
ilk 1 Jitkion
Lftfc* SMBHBllll
Finmd Fin SUtlon
Cnh»
StfBtr
CITT/COUNTT
SMttlt/IIng Cc
tti Sianmltll/
Firt/'t«rn to
^«/M,™CC
•
STATr
w
Mt
W
0
u
ira
urns
Mns
MIS
SUMS
MTS
swion nn
citjp cmur
niril/
wburUn/
midntlil
runt/
kqrlcullunl
lutyrUn/
mldoittil
OATH
II
7MI
«"'
7141
Ml I.)
7
7
S
E
4
*
FWX CC
"
8
64
4S
tW RD
120
"
42
130
MH
4000
SCO
in
ion
OTHEH
HIM «tu caltactM it,
VIM feu frai Fort Union (S«»li>
«"* «t loc»>
Nlilng h«l|lit *1U fm Fart union (StittUl
.ntd for tat»»et.
into lor MMthiig.
-------
Non-attainment area Seattle, WA
MODELING
o Modeling Status
Model used: City-Specific EKMA
- Preliminary Modeling Completed? Yes/fKX; 1f Yes, date 3/05/82. report date
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS No
- Final Modeling Completed? Yes/Nft; if Yes, date unknown
- Reviewed by: R0(s) Yes OAQPS Yes
o Key Modeling Information (Final Modeling Only)
- Modeling Days Selected? Yes/Nfl; if Yes, date unknown
Transported Peak 03
Site-Days NMOC/NOv 03 Concen- Concentration Calculated
Modeled Ratio(s) tration(ppm) (ppm) % HC Control
Graham, WA
8/07/81** * *** 0.14 22
8/08/81** * *** 0 14 22
3/10/81** * *** O'l4 22
8/11/81** * *** 0.15 22
Lake Sammamish, WA #49098001OF01
8/11/81** * *** 0.15 33
Sumner, WA #492100001101
8/10/81** * *** 0.15 '36
8/07/81** * *** 0.13 14
8/11/81** * *** 0.13 14
Firwood, WA #491560004F01
8/10/81** * *** 0.13 16
o % HC Control Needed To Attain 0, NAAQS 24.3****
O "^^^^»—^^^^«^^»^»«
Remarks: *NMOC/NOx ratios of 9.5:1. 4.1:1. and 3.4:1 were used on all days
modeled. The ratio which gave the most control was used to establish the-control
required for each day. **No exceedances were observed in 1980. Exceedances in
1979 were modeled. Although, specific information on these days is not available.
the 1979 data will not affect the control requirements, according to the Region.
***Values of zero were incorrectly used for the modeling runs. ****Additional
modeling using transported ozone of 0.035 was conducted by the Region resulting
in a revised % HC control value of 24.3%.
------- |