- -1 ')'>'ir>
Compilation of Environmental Assessment Data
February 1978-Mnrch 1979. Volume I. Studies
Research Triangle Inst.
Research IriariRlo Park, NC
Prepared for
Industrial Environmental Research
Resenreh Triangle P.irk, NT
Jul 30
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Technical Information Service
-------
KI'A i>()()/;'-.SO- I./'
Aug. 1980
COMPILATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DATA
February 1978-March 1979
Volume I, Studies 1-7
by
N. G. Sexton
L. I. Southerland
Systems & Measurements Division
Research Ttianqlo Institute
Research nianulc; P;nk. North Carolina 2770S)
EPA Contract No. 68-02 2688
Task Directive No. 11200
EPA Project Officer: L. D. Johnson
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
U S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Prepared for
U.S. INVIHONMCNIAL PROTECTION ACil-'NCY
Offii:i« cil Resciiti'h and Developmont
Washington, DC 2O460
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Inunctions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
a
2.
IERL-RTP-1073
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Compilation of Environmental Assessment Data,
February 1978-March 1979; Vol. I, Studies 1-7
7. AUTHOR(S)
N. G. Sexton and L. I. Southerland
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
5. REPORT DATE
July 1980
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
B. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
RTI/1699-12/01S
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
Research Triangle Institute
P.O. Box 12194
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
OC2JN1E
11. CONTRACT /GRANT NO.
68-02-2688,
Task Directive 11200
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
EPA, Office of Research and Development
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PE
Final; 2/78 - 3/79
RIOD COVERED
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/13
15.SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES ERL-RTP project officer is L.D. Johnson, MD-62, 919/541-
2557. Report EPA-600/2-78-211 is an earlier report compiling similar data between
the start of the program and 3/78.
16. ABSTRACT
The three-volume report compiles all data from EPA/IERL-RTP's phased
environmental assessment program for the period 2/78-3/79. It includes data from
14 environmental assessment studies, compiled in standard format. The formatted
Level 1 data are organized within each study by the analytical technique used to gen-
erate the data. Inorganic data as generated by spark source mass spectroscopy,
atomic absorption, gas chromatography, chemiluminescence for oxides of nitrogen,
anion analysis, and aqueous analysis precede the organic data generated by gas
chromatography for C1-C6/C7 or C7-C17, liquid chromatographic fractionation,
infrared spectroscopy, and low resolution mass spectroscopy. Sampling and analy-
tical techniques that were used, that are not specified in Level 1, are documented
in the summaries and data pages. Each Level 1 data section is followed by a Level 2
data section and/or an additional data section. Tables and figures in the Level 2 and
additional data sections have been reproduced from the documents originally publis-
hed by the organization conducting the study. The studies are organized by indus-
trial type: (Vol. I) chemically active fluidized-bed combustion, coal-fired boiler and
oil-fired boiler, coal-fired power plant, and coal gasifier; (Vol. n) coke production,
and ferroalloy process; and (Vol. HI) the remaining industrial processes.
7.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
c. COSATI Field/Group
Pollution
Assessments
Chemical Arialys is
Sampling
Pollution Control
Stationary Sources
Environmental Assess-
ment
Level 1 Data
Chemical Data
13B
14B
07D
B. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
Unclassified
21. NO OF PAGES
20 SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
Unclassified
22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 |»-73I
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Industrial Environmental Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for pub-
lication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement
or recommendation for use.
I-a
-------
ABSTRACT
This document compiles all available data from the IERL Phased Environ-
mental Assessment Program for the period February 1978 through March 1979.
This document follows an earlier publication, EPA-600/2-78-211, Compilation
of Level 1 Environmental Assessment Data, which compiled all available chemical
data from the inception of the Environmental Assessment Program through
March 1978.
Available data from 14 environmental assessment studies are compiled in
this document in standard formats. The formatted Level 1 data are organized
within each study by the analytical technique used to generate the data.
Inorganic data as generated by spark source mass spectroscopy, atomic absorp-
tion, gas chromatography, chemiluminescence for oxides of nitrogen, anion
analysis, and aqueous analysis precede the organic data generated by gas
chromatography for C!-C6/C7 or C7-C17, liquid chromatographic fractionation,
infrared spectroscopy, and low resolution mass spectroscopy. Sampling and
analytical techniques that were used that are not specified in Level 1 are
documented in the summaries and data pages.
Each Level 1 data section is followed by a Level 2 data section and/or an
additional data section. The tables and figures in the Level 2 and additional
data sections have been reproduced from the documents originally published by
the organization conducting the study.
Each study is introduced by a summary, which is followed by the data
generated in that study. The studies are organized by industrial type as
follows: Chemically Active Fluidized-Bed Combustion, Coal-Fired Boiler and
Oil-Fired Boiler, Coal-Fired Power Plant, Coal Gasifier, Coke Production,
Ferroalloy Process, Internal Combustion Engine, Iron and Steel Mills, Residen-
tial Heating, Shale Oil Retorting, and Textiles.
-------
CONTENTS
Page
Abstract ii
Figures v
Tables vii
Introduction xxiii
Chemically Active Fluidized Bed Combustor
Study 1. Level 2 Chemical Analysis of Fluidized-Bed
Combustor Samples 1-1
Study 2. Preliminary Environmental Assessment of the
Lignite-Fired CAFB 2-1
Coal-Fired Boiler and Oil-Fired Boiler
Study 3. Environmental Assessment of Coal and Oil Firing
in a Controlled Industrial Boiler,
Volumes I-III 3-1
Coal-Fired Power Plant
Study 4. Air Emissions From Combustion of Solvent. Refined
Coal 4-1
Study 5. Characterization of Coal Pile Drainage 5-1
Study 6. Level 1 Assessment of Limestone Scrubbing With
Adipic Acid Addition 6-1
Coal Gasification
Study 7. Analyses of Grab Samples for Fixed-Bed Coal
Gasification Processes 7-1
Coke Production
Study 8. Environmental Assessment of Coke By-ProducL
Recovery Plants 8-1*
Ferroalloy Process
Study 9. Ferroalloy Process Emissions Measurement 9-1*
Internal Combustion Engines
Study 10. Finissions Assessment, of Conventional Stationary
Combustion Systems, Volume II 10- 11
Iron and Steel Mills
Study 11. Assessment of Surface Run Off From Iron and
Steel Mills 11-It
m
-------
CONTENTS (continued)
Residential Heating
Study 12. Source Assessment: Coal-Fired Residential
Combustion Equipment Field Tests, June 1977 .... 12-lt
Shale Oil Retorting
Study 13. Sampling and Analysis Research Program at the
Paraho Shale Oil Demonstration Plant,
Volume II . 13-It
Textiles
Study 14. Source Assessment: Textile Plant Wastewater Toxics
Study, Phase II 14-It
*In Volume II.
tin Volume III.
IV
-------
FIGURES
Number
Page
STUDY 1
1-1 Level 2 organic analysis scheme 1-8
STUDY 2
2-1 Unit operations flow diagram of the ESSO pilot
plant ?-;}
Additional Data
18 Depth profile of sulfur in SASS-1 filter particulate. . . . 2-110
19 Depth profile of sulfur in SASS-2 filter particulate. . . . 2-110
7 IR spectrum of XAD-2 resin from SASS-1 2-111
8 IR spectrum of XAD-2 resin from SASS-2 2-111
STUDY 3
/
3-1 Boiler system schematic and sampling locations 3-3
Additional Data
5-2 Depth profile analysis of outlet coal particulate,
Test 201-1 3-31
4-2 Depth profile analysis of outlet coal particulate,
Test 201-1 . . 3-46
4-2 Comparison of N0x air quality resulting from coal and
oil firing under worst case weather conditions,
Tests 201-1 and 202-1 3-48
4-3 Comparison of NO air quality resulting from coal and
oil firing under typical weather conditions,
Tests 201-1 and 202-1 3-49
4-4 Comparison of CO air quality resulting from coal and
oil firing under worst case weather conditions,
Tests 201:1 and 202-1 3-50
4-5 Comparison of CO air quality resulting from coal and
oil firing under typical weather conditions,
Tests 201-1 and 202-1 3-51
4-6 Comparison of S02 air quality resulting from coal and
oil firing under worst case weather conditions,
Tests 201-1 and 202-1 3-52
4-7 Comparison of S02 air quality resulting from coal and
oil firing under typical weather conditions,
Tests 201-1 and 202-1 3-53
4-8 Comparison of particulate air quality resulting from
coal and oil firing under worst case weather
conditions, Tests 201-1 and 202-1 . 3-54
-------
FIGURES
Number Page
4-9 Comparison of particulate air quality resulting from
coal and oil firing under typical weather
conditions, Tests 201-1 and 202-1 . . 3-55
STUDY 4
4-1 Diagram: of sampling locations 4-3
STUDY 5
5-1 Coal pile and drainage collection system, plant J ..... 5-3
Additional Data
6 Physicochemical data for plants J and E 5-31
7 Results of discrete storm analysis. 5-32
8 Results of time to equilibrium analyses 5-33
9 Coal pH 5-34
10 Results of varying coal to elute ratio and
coal size 5-35
11 Results of varying elute pH and hardness. . 5-36
STUDY 6
6-1 Process flow diagram for venturi/spray tower system .... 6-3
6-2 Process flow diagram for TCA system 6-4
STUDY 7
7-1 Gasification unit process flow diagram, Site A 7-4
Additional Data
5-1 Size distributions of cyclone dust samples from several
sites 7-26
5-8 Methylene chloride extract of quench water. . 7-27
5-9 Infrared spectra of ether extract of quench water 7-28
5-10 Ether extract of acidified quench water 7-29
VI
-------
TABLES
Number
1-1
1-2
1-3
Level
1-4
1-5
1-6
1-7
1-8
1-9
1-10
1-11
1-12
1-13
1-14
1-15
1-16
1-17
1-18
1-19
1-20
1-21
1-22
1-23
1-24
1-25
1-26
1-27
1-28
1-29
1-30
1-31
1-32
1-33
1-34
1-35
1-36
STUDY 1
Organic Summary
Inorganic Summary .
No title
1
Atomic Absorption Analysis . .
Atomic Absorption Analysis
Gas Chromatography Analysis, Run #2, Sample S-2-3 . . .
Gas Chromatography Analysis, Run #2, Sample S-2-4 . . .
Gas Chromatography Analysis, Run #2, Sample S-2-5 . . .
Gas Chromatography Analysis, Run #2, Sample $-2-6 . . .
Gas Chromatography Analysis, Run #2, Sample S-2-7 . . .
Gas Chromatography Analysis, Run #2, Sample S-2-1 . . .
Gas Chromatography Analysis, Run #2, Sample S-2-2 . . .
LC Fractionation, Sample S-2-1
LC Fractionation, Sample S-2-3
LC Fractionation, Sample S-2-4
LC Fractionation, Sample S-2-5
LC Fractionation, Sample S-2-6
LC Fractionation, Sample S-2-7
IR Report, Sample S-2-6
IR Report, Sample S-2-3
IR Report, Sample S-2-4 .
IR Report, Sample S-2-5
IR Report, Samples S-2-7-2 and S-2-7-3
IR Report, Samples S-2-1, >C13 and S-2-2, >C13
IR Report, Samples S-2-3, >C13 and S-2-4, >C13
IR Report, Samples S-2-5, C13 and S-2-6, C13
IR Report, Sample S-2-7, >C13
IR Report, Sample S-2-1, LC Fractionation
IR Report, Sample S-2-1, LC Fractionation
IR Report, Sample S-2-3, LC Fractionation
IR Report, Sample S-2-4, LC Fractionation
IR Report, Sample S-2-5, LC Fractionation
IR Report, Sample S-2-6, LC Fractionation
IR Report, Sample S-2-7, LC Fractionation
LRMS Report, Sample S-2-1
LRMS Report, Sample S-2-3
. . 1-3
. . 1-4
. . 1-9
. . 1-13
. . 1-13
. . 1-14
. ; 1-14
. . 1-15
. . 1-15
. . 1-16
. . 1-16
. . 1-17
. . 1-19
. . 1-20
. . 1-21
. . 1-22
. . 1-23
. . 1-24
. . 1-26
. . 1-27
. . 1-28
. . 1-29
. . 1-30
. . 1-31
. . 1-32
. . 1-33
. . 1-34
. . 1-35
. . 1-36
. . 1-37
. . 1-38
. . 1-39
. . 1-40
. . 1-41
. . 1-42
. . 1-43
VI1
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
Page
1-37 LRMS Report, Sample S-2-4 1-44
1-38 LRMS Report, Sample S-2-5 1-45
1-39 LRMS Report, Sample $-2-6 1-46
1-40 LRMS Report, Sample S-2-7 1-47
Level 2
2-3 Summary of Required Level 2 Analysis 1-51
3-1 Tabulation of Thermal Gravimetric Data 1-52
3-7 ICPOES Results on Leachate Samples 1-54
3-10 ESCA Results 1-55
3-11 XRD Results 1-57
3-12 EPMA Identified Elements 1-59
3-13 Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples 1-60
3-14 Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials 1-72
4-1 Results of Level 2 Survey Analysis for Polynuclear
Organic Compounds 1-84
4-3 Level 2 Survey Analysis of Liquid Chromatographic
Fractions 1-85
4-4 Results of Chemical lonization GC/MS Analysis 1-92
Additional Data
2-2 Total Emission Data From 6-inch FBC Unit 1-94
3-3 Atomic Absorption Analytical Operating Parameters 1-121
3-4 Atomic Absorption Particulate Analysis Results 1-122
3-5 Atomic Absorption Leachate Solution Analysis
Results 1-123
3-6 Percent Recovery of Spiked Samples by Atomic Absorption . . 1-124
3-8 ICPOES Recovery Results 1-125
STUDY 2
2-1 Laboratory Analysis Plan for CAFB-Lignite Study 2-6
Level 1
2-2 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy,
2-3 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy,
2-4 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy,
2-5 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy,
2-6 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy,
2-7 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy,
2-8 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy,
2-9 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy,
2-10 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy,
Run #1, 10-um Cyclone ... 2-8
Run #1, 3-um Cyclone. ... 2-9
Run #1, 1-um Cyclone. ... 2-10
Run #1, SASS Filter Catch . 2-11
Run #1, XAD-2 Resin . . . . 2-12
Run #1, Composite Sample. . 2-13
Run #1, Total SASS Catch. . 2-14
Run #1, Emission Found. . . 2-15
Run #2, 10-um Cyclone ... 2-16
VTM
-------
TABLES (continued)
3-|jm Cyclone. . .
l-|jm Cyclone. . .
SASS Filter Catch
XAD-2 Resin . . .
Composite Sample.
Total SASS Catch.
Run #2, Emission Found. .
Number
2-11 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Run #2,
2-12 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Run #2,
2-13 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Run #2,
2-14 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Run #2,
2-15 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Run #2,
2-16 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Run #2,
2-17 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
2-18 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, ESSO, England,
CAFB Pilot Plant SASS-1
2-19 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, ESSO, England,
CAFB Pilot Plant SASS-2
2-20 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Conventional Lignite
Boiler with Multiclone - Site A
2-21 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Conventional Lignite
Boiler with ESP Site B
2-22 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Particulate Filter
From SASS-1
2-23 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Particulate Filter Blank
From SASS-1 and SASS-2
2-24 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Particulate Filter
From SASS-2 .-.
2-25 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, CAFB Lignite
2-26 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
2-27 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
2-28 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
2-29 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
2-30 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
2-31 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
2-32 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
2-33 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Biological Plant
Sludge Sample
2-34 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, 10-um Cyclone Catch
From SASS-1
2-35 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, 3-um Cyclone Catch From
SASS-1
2-36 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, 1-um Cyclone Catch From
SASS-1
2-37 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, XAD-2 Resin From SASS-1
2-38 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, XAD-2 Resin Blank for
SASS-1 and SASS-2
2-39 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Composite Sample
From SASS-1
2-40 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Composite Sample Blank
From SASS-1
2-41 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, 10-pm Cyclone Catch
From SASS-2
2-42 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, S-pm Cyclone Catch
From SASS-2 '....'
CAFB Stack Knockout . . .
CAFB Stack Cyclone. . . .
CAFB Regenerator Cyclone.
CAFB Gasifier Bed . . . .
CAFB Regenerator Bed. . .
CAFB Oil Feed
CAFB Bitumen
Page
2-17
2-18
2-19
2-20
2-21
2-22
2-23
2-24
2-25
2-26
2-27
2-28
2-29
2-30
2-31
2-32
2-33
2-34
2-35
2-36
2-37
2-38
2-39
2-40
2-41
2-42
2-43
2-44
2-45
2-46
2-47
2-48
IX
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
2-43 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, 1-um Cyclone Catch
From SASS-2 2-49
2-44 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, XAD-2 Resin From SASS-2 ! . 2-50
2-45 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Composite Sample From
SASS~2 _ 2~51
2-46 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Composite Sample Blank
From SASS-2 2-52
2-47 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, CAFB Limestone. '.'.'.'.'' 2-53
2-48 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, CAFB Fines Return . . 2-54
2-49 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, CAFB Boiler Back. . 2-55
2-50 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, CAFB Boiler Sides . 2-b6
2-51 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, CAFB Limestone Feed . . . 2-57
2-52 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, CAFB Lignite 2-58
2-53 Atomic Absorption Analysis, CAFB-Lignite Study 2-59
2-54 Atomic Absorption Analysis, CAFB-Lignite Process
SASS Run #1 2_60
2-55 Atomic Absorption Analysis, CAFB-Lignite Process
SASS Run #2 2-60
2-56 Atomic Absorption Analysis, Venturi Scrubber. '...'.'.'.'. 2-61
2-57 Atomic Absorption Analysis, TCA Scrubber .'."!' 2-61
2-58 Atomic Absorption Analysis, Oxidation Tank Vent ...'.'.' 2-61
2-59 Atomic Absorption Analysis, Scrubber Samples. . . 2-62
2-60 Fixed Gases CAFB Gas Analysis ; . ' ' 2-63
2-61 Nitrogen Oxides CAFB Gas Analysis " 2-63
2-62 Sulfur Species CAFB Gas Analysis " 2-63
2-63 Fixed Gases CAFB Pilot Plant 2-64
2-64 Sulfur Gases CAFB Pilot Plant [ 2-64
2-65 Nitrogen Gases CAFB Pilot Plant 2-64
2-66 Anion Analysis, CAFB-Lignite Study. . . 2-65
2-67 Anion Analysis, CAFB-Lignite Process, SASS Run #1 . . 2-66
2-68 Anion Analysis, CAFB-Lignite Process, SASS Run #2 . 2-66
2-69 Gas Chromatography Analysis, CAFB Gas Analysis, 1/24. 2-67
2-70 Gas Chromatography Analysis, CAFB Gas Analysis, 1/25. . . 2-67
2-71 Gas Chromatography Analysis, CAFB Gas Analysis. . . 2-67
2-72 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Total CAFB Organic
Emissions, SASS #1 2-68
2-73 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Total CAFB Organic
Emissions, SASS #2 2-68
2-74 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Total CAFB Organic
Emissions, SASS #1 2-69
2-75 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Total CAFB Organic
Emissions, SASS #2 2-69
2-76 Gas Chromatography Analysis ..'.'.'.'.'.'.'. 2-70
2-77 Gas Chromatography Analysis, CAFB SASS Samples, io-um
Cyclone 2-70
2-78 Gas Chromatography Analysis, CAFB SASS Samples, 3-um
Cyclone 2-71
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
2-79
2-80
2-81
2-82
2-83
2-84
2-85
2-86
2-87
2-88
2-89
2-90
2-91
2-92
2-93
2-94
2-95
2-96
2-97
2-98
2-99
2-100
2-101
2-102
2-103
2-104
2-105
2-106
2-107
2-108
2-109
2-110
2-110
Oxidation Tank Vent.
TCA Scrubber . . . .
Spent Stone
Gas Chromatography Analysis, CAFB SASS Samples, 1-um
Cyclone
Gas Chromatography Analysis, CAFB SASS Samples, Particu-
late Filter .
Gas Chromatography Analysis, CAFB SASS Samples, Probe
Rinse
Gas Chromatography Analysis, CAFB SASS Samples, XAD-2
Resin
Gas Chromatography Analysis, CAFB SASS Samples, Module
Rinse
Gas Chromatography Analysis, CAFB SASS Samples, Condensate.
CAFB Particulate Mass and Size Emissions Data
Measured by SASS Train
Gas Chromatography Analysis, Venturi Scrubber
Gas Chromatography Analysis,
Gas Chromatography Analysis,
Gas Chromatography Analysis,
From Regenerator
TCO and GRAV Values for Organic Sample, CAFB SASS Samples,
Run No. 2, 10-um Cyclone, 3-um Cycle, 1-um Cyclone. . . .
TCO and GRAV Values for Organic Sample, CAFB SASS Samples,
Run No. 2, Particulate Filter, Probe Rinse, XAD-2 Rinse .
TCO and GRAV Values for Organic Sample, CAFB SASS Samples,
Run No. 2, Module Rinse, Condensate
TCO and GRAV Values for Organic Sample, CAFB SASS Samples,
Run No. 1, 10-um Cyclone, 3-um Cycle, 1-um Cyclone. . . .
TCO and GRAV Values for Organic Sample, CAFB SASS Samples,
Run No. 1, Particulate Filter, Particulate Filter, XAD-2
Resin
TCO and GRAV Values for Organic Sample, CAFB SASS Samples,
Run No. 1, Module Rinse, Condensate
TCO and GRAV Values for Organic Sample, Total Organic
Emissions (C7-C16), SASS Run #1 and Run #2
LC Fractionation, Sample, Spent Stone from Regenerator. . .
SASS Run #1, Condensate
SASS Run #1,
SASS Run #1,
SASS Run #1,
SASS Run #2,
SASS Run #2,
SASS Run #2,
IR Report,
IR Report,
IR Report,
IR Report,
IR Report.
IR Report,
IR Report,
IR Report,
IR Report,
IR Report,
IR Report,
Sample,
Sample,
Sample,
Sample,
Sample,
Sample,
Sample,
Sample,
Sample,
Sample,
Sample,
Module Rinse. .
1 u Cyclone . .
3 u Cyclone . .
XAD-2 Resin . .
Module Rinse. .
Condensate. . .
SASS Run #2, Probe Rinse . .
2-MR, LC Fractionation . . .
XAD-2 Resin, LC Fractionation
Spent Stone from Regenerator
IR Report, Sample, SASS Run #1, XAD-2 Resin . .
Summary of Trace Element Data
Summary of Trace Element Data
Page
2-71
2-72
2-72
2-73
2-73
2-74
2-/5
2-76
2-76
2-76
2-77
2-78
2-79
2-80
2-81
2-8?
2-83
2-84
2-85
2-86
2-87
2-88
2-89
2-90
2-91
2-92
2-93
2-95
2-96
2-98
2-99
2-100
2-100
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
Additional Data
Page
3 CAFB Particulate Test Data 2-102
9 Total >C6 Organic Emissions 2-103
12 Organic Emissions in CAFB RAC Samples 2-103
15 Interpretation of IR Spectra From Gravimetric Residues
of RAC Sample Extracts Without LC Fractions 2-104
18 Interpretation of IR Spectra From Gravimetric Residues
of Tenax Resin Extract and Its LC Fractions 2-105
24 RAC-1 Trace Element Emissions 2-106
25 RAC-2 Trace Element Emissions 2-107
28 Quantification Data From ESCA Analyses of RAC Train
Particulate Filters 2-108
29 Elemental Quantification Data for SASS Particulate Samples
From ESCA Analysis. 2-109
30 SAM/IA Worksheet for Level I - ESSO, England, CAFB
Pilot Plant 2-112
31 SAM/IA Worksheet for Level I - ESSO, England, CAFB
Pilot Plant, SASS-1 2-113
32 SAM/IA Worksheet for Level I - ESSO, England, CAFB
Pilot Plant, SASS-2 2-116
33 SAM/IA Worksheet for Level I - Conventional Lignite
Boiler with Multiclone - Site A 2-119
34 SAM/IA Worksheet for Level I - Conventional Lignite
Boiler with ESP - Site B 2-122
36 Total CAFB Organic Emissions 2-12-5
STUDY 3
3-1 Parameters Sampled for Coal and Oil Firing 3-4
Level 1
3-2 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Fuel Oil, Test 202-4. ... 3-6
3-3 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Feed Coal, Test 201-1 ... 3-7
3-4 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Wastewater Inorganics,
Coal Firing 3-8
3-5 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Wastewater Inorganics,
Oil Firing 3-9
3-6 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Scrubber Cake From Oil
Firing (Dry Basis), Test 202-4 3-10
3-7 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Scrubber Inlet Coal Firing,
Test 201-1 3-11
3-8 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Scrubber Outlet Coal Firing,
Test 201-1 3-12
3-9 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Scrubber Outlet Coal Firing,
Test 202-4 . 3-13
xii
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
3-10
3-11
3-12
3-13
3-14
3-15
3-16
3-17
3-18
3-19
3-20
3-21
3-22
3-23
3-24
3-25
3-26
3-27
3-28
3-29
3-30
3-31
3-32
3-33
3-34
3-35
3-36
3-37
Level 2
1
9
5-4
5-20
4-14
4-15
4-16
4-17
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Scrubber Inlet Coal Firing,
Test 202-4
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Coal Test 201-1 Sample B. .
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Coal Test 201-1 Sample A. .
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Fuel Oil, Test 202-4. . . .
Atomic Absorption Analysis, Coal Firing, Test 201-1 ....
Atomic Absorption Analysis, Oil Firing, Test 202-4
Atomic Absorption Analysis, Fuel Oil
Sulfur Gas Emissions From Coal Firing
Sulfur Gas Emissions From Coal Firing
Anion Analysis, Coal Firing, Test 201-1
Nitrogen Oxide Gases Scrubber Inlet
Nitrogen Oxide Gases Scrubber Outlet
Anion Analysis Inlet and Outlet of FGD, HN03 Extract. . . .
Anion Analysis Inlet and Outlet of FGD, Hot
Water Extract
Anion Analysis, Oil Firing, Test 202-4
Coal Firing, Test 200 ,
Coal Firing,
Coal Firing,
Coal Firing,
Coal Firing,
Oil Firing,
Oil Firing,
Oil Firing,
Field Water Analysis,
Field Water Analysis,
Field Water Analysis,
Field Water Analysis,
Field Water Analysis,
Field Water Analysis,
Field Water Analysis,
Field Water Analysis,
Test 201-1
Test 201-2
Test 201-3
Test 201-4
Test 202-1.
Test 202-2.
Test 202-3.
Test 202-4.
Field Water Analysis, Oil Firing,
Field Water Analysis, Oil Firing, Test 203
Gas Chromatography Analysis Coal-Firing Wastewater.
Gas Chromatography Analysis Oil-Firing Wastewater .
LC Analysis Results .
Organic Analysis Results
Surface Atom Percent From ESCA Data
Concentration of Major Trace Elements in Coal,
Test 201-1
Depth Profile Analysis of Coal Particulate with Concentra-
tions Expressed as Normalized Atom Percent, Test 201-1.
Emission Concentrations of Trace Elements During Coal
Firing, Test 201-1
Emission Concentrations of Trace Elements During Oil
Firing, Test 202-4
Emission Factors and Mass Emission Rates of Trace
Elements During Coal Firing, Test 201-1
Emission Factors and Mass Emission Rates of Trace
Elements During Oil Firing, Test 202-4
Page
3-14
3-15
3-16
3-17
3-18
3-18
3-18
3-19
3-19
3-19
3-20
3-?0
3-21
3-21
3-21
3-22
3-22
3-22
3-22
3-23
3-23
3-23
3-23
3-24
3-24
3-25
3-25
3-29
3-32
3-33
3-34
3-35
3-36
3-37
3-38
3-39
xiii
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
4-33 Inorganic Content of Scrubber Cake From Coal Firing
(Dry Basis), Test 201-1 3-40
4-34 Inorganic Content of Scrubber Cake From Oil Firing
(Dry Basis), Test 202-4 3-41
4-35 Inorganic Content of Fly Ash From Coal Firing,
Test 201-1 3-42
4-36 Mass Balance of Trace Elements, Test 201-1 3-43
4-37 Mass Balance of Trace Elements, Test 202-4 3-44
5-13 Composition of FGD Scrubber Cake. 3-45
4-38 Annual Emissions 3-47
4-3 Summary of Ultimate Fuel Analyses . 3-56
4-7 Summary of Criteria Pollutant Emissions, Coal Firing. . . . 3-57
4-8 Summary of Criteria Pollutant Emissions, Oil Firing .... 3-58
4-10 Scrubber Inlet and Outlet, Particulate Size Distribution. . 3-59
4-11 Emission Rates of Participates 3-59
4-13 Summary of Sulfate Emissions During Coal and Oil Firing . . 3-GO
4-18 Depth Profile Analysis of Coal Particulate With Concentra-
tions Expressed as Normalized Atom Percent, Test 201-1. . 3-61
4-19 Depth Profile Analysis of Oil Particulate With Concentra-
tions Expressed as Normalized Atom Percent, Test 202-4. . 3-61
4-20 Major Particulate Components Determined by PLM Analysis . . 3-62
4-25 Comparison of Organic Compounds Identified by GC/MS
in the Flue Gas During Coal and Oil Firing 3-63
Additional Data
2 Parameters Sampled for Coal and Oil Firing. ... 3-65
3 Annual Emissions^. . 3-66
4-12 S02, S03, and S04 Emissions From Coal and Oil Firing. . . . 3-67
4-24 Summary of the Infrared Analysis of Organics From Oil
and Coal Combustion 3-68
1 Input Data Used in Plume Height Calculations 3-69
2 Process Samples Analyzed by GC/MS 3-70
STUDY 4
4-1 SRC Emissions 4-4
Level 1
4-2 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SRC Sample 4-6
4-3 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS Train Sample,
June 19, 1977 4-7
4-4 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS Train Sample,
June 16, 1977 4-8
4-5 Atomic Absorption Analysis, SRC SASS Train Sample,
June 14, 1977 '. 4-9
xiv
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
4-6
4-7
4-8
4-9
4-10
4-11
4-12
4-13
4-14
4-15
4-16
4-17
4-18
4-19
4-20
4-21
4-22
4-23
4-24
4-25
4-26
4-27
4-28
4-29
4-30
4-31
4-32
4-33
4-34
4-35
4-36
4-37
4-38
4-39
4-40
Page
Atomic Absorption Analysis, Coal Grab Samples,
May 25, 1977 . 4-9
Atomic Absorption Analysis, Coal SASS Train Sample,
May 25, 1977 . . . . 4-9
Atomic Absorption Analysis, SRC Grab Samples,
June 14, 1977 4-10
Atomic Absorption Analysis, Combined Particulates
and XAD-2 Resin 4-10
Atomic Absorption Analysis, Combined Particulates
and XAD-2 Resin 4-10
Atomic Absorption Analysis, Combined Particulates
and XAD-2 Resin 4-11
Atomic Absorption Analysis, Coal and SRC 4-11
Fixed Gases Grab Samples, Phase I - Coal Combustion .... 4-12
Fixed Gases . 4-12
Sulfur Gases Grab Samples, Phase III, Coal Combustion . . . .4-1.3
Nitrogen Oxide Gases Grab Samples, Phase II,
Coal Combustion 4-13
GC Analysis, Cj-C6 Grab Samples, Phase III,
Coal Combustion 4-14
Fixed Gases Grab Samples, Phase III, SRC Combustion .... 4-14
Fixed Gases Grab Samples, Phase II, SRC Combustion 4-15
Fixed Gases Grab Samples, Phase II, SRC Combustion. .... 4-15
Sulfur Gases Grab Samples, Phase III, SRC Combustion. . . . 4-16
Nitrogen Oxide Gases Grab Samples, Phase III,
SRC Combustion. . , 4-17
GC Analysis, Ci-C6 Grab Samples, Phase III,
SRC Combustion 4-18
Gas Chromatography Analysis, June 19, 1977 4-19
Gas Chromatography Analysis,
Gas Chromatography Analysis,
Gas Chromatography Analysis,
Gas Chromatography Analysis
June 16, 1977 4-19
SRC, June 14, 1977 ...... 4-20
Coal, May 25, 1977 4-20
Coal, May 25, 1977 4-21
Gas Chromatography Analysis, SRC, June 14, 1977 4-21
IR Report, Sample, XAD-2 Resin Blank 4-22
IR Report, Sample, Probe Rinse. . 4-22
IR Report, Sample, XAD-2 Module Condensate Extract plus
Module Rinse 4-23
IR Report, Sample, XAD-2 Resin -. 4-23
IR Report,
IR Report,
IR Report,
IR Report,
Sample,
Sample,
Sample,
Sample,
Methylene Chloride Blank 4-24
Methanol Blank
Methylene Chloride-Methanol Blank. .
Probe Rinse
IR Report, Sample, XAD-2 Module Condensate Extract Plus
Module Rinse
4-24
4-25
4-26
4-26
IR Report, Sample, XAD-2 Resin 4-27
IR Report, Sample, Methylene Chloride Blank 4-27
xv
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
4-41
4-42
4-43
Level 2
17
IR Report, Sample, Methanol Blank 4-28
IR Report, Sample, Methylene Chloride-Methanol Blank. . . . 4-28
IR Report, Sample, XAD-2 Resin Blank 4-29
An Analysis for Inorganics 4-31
Additional Data
1
2
5
6
7
15
19
20
21
Phase II, Coal Combustion Test Sampling Schedule. ..... 4-33
Phase III, SRC Coal Combustion Test Sampling Schedule . . . 4-33
Combustion Test, Phase II, Coal Samples 4-34
Combustion Test, Phase III, SRC Samples 4-34
Process Information 4-35
Process Information 4-36
Inorganic Air Emissions for Coal and SRC 4-37
S00 and NO Emissions for Coal and SRC 4-38
Colfoar1son*of SRC Air Emissions with MEG's 4-39
STUDY 5
Level 1
5-1
5-2
5-3
5-4
5-5
5-6
5-7
5-8
5-9
5-10
5-11
5-12
5-13
5-14
5-15
5-16
5-17
5-18
5-19
5-20
5-21
5-22
5-23
5-24
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, March 9, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, April 7, 1976 .....
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, April 13, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, April 29, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, May 5, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, May 14, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, May 26, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, June 9, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, June 17, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, June 22, 1979
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, July 1, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, July 7, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, July 29, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, August 27, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, September 1, 1976. . . .
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, September 8, 1976. . . .
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, September 29, 1976 . . .
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, October 6, 1976
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, October 13, 1976 ....
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, October 20, 1976 ....
Field Water Analysis, Plant J, October 27, 1976 ....
Field Water Analysis, Plant E.^November 3, 1976 ....
Field Water Analysis, Plant E, November 27, 1976. . . .
Field Water Analysis, Plant E, December 2, 1976 . . . .
. . b-b
. . 5-b
. . 5-5
. . 5-5
. . 5-6
. . 5-6
. . 5-6
. . 5-6
. . 5-7
. . 5-7
. . 5-7
. . 5-7
. . 5-8
. . 5-8
. . 5-8
. . 5-8
. . 5-9
. . 5-9
. . 5-9
. . 5-9
. . 5-10
. . 5-10
. . 5-10
5-10
XVI
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
5-25
5-26
5-27
5-28
5-29
5-30
5-31
5-32
5-33
Additional Data
Field
Field
Field
Field
Field
Field
Field
Field
Field
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Water
Analysis
Analysis
Analysi s
Analysi s
Analysis
Analysi s
Analysi s
Analysis
Analysis
J
>
»
Plant
Plant
Plant
Plant
Plant
Plant
Plant
Plant
Plant
E,
E,
E
E
w t
E,
E.
E,
E
F.
December
December
December
March 2,
March 7,
March 14
April 6,
April 26
June 21.
16, 1976
22, 1976
28, 1976
1977
1977.
, 1977
1977 '. .
, 1977
1977. .
c-i
C-2
4
5
6
7
9
10
11
12
13
B-2
B-3
Water Quality Data, Plant J
Water Quality Data, Plant E
Correlation Matrix, Plant E
Correlation Matrix, Plant J
Correlation Matrix, Both Plants E and J
Correlations with r Values >0.71
Acid-Base Balance
Coal Analysis, Plants J and E
Coal Analysis, Plant J
Results of Shaker Tests, Plants J and E
Chemical Composition of Coal Pile Drainage Used for
Treatment Study .....
Rainfall-Runoff Data, Plant J
Weir Readings for Determination of Pumping Rate . .
Page
5-11
5-11
5-11
5-11
5-12
5-12
5-12
5-12
5-13
5-15
5-16
5-17
5-19
5-21
5-23
5-24
5-25
5-26
5-27
5-28
5-29
5-30
STUDY 6
6-1 Sample Analysis
Level 1
6-2 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS Filter Particulates--
Oxidation Tank Vent
6-3 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS Probe and Cyclone
Rinse Residue--Venturi Scrubber
6-4 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS 10-.and 3-(jm
Particulates—Venturi Scrubber
6-5 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS l-pm and Filter
Particulates--Venturi Scrubber
6-6 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS XAD-2
Res in--Venturi Scrubber
6-7 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS Condensate and First
Impinger—Venturi Scrubber
6-8 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS Probe and Cyclone
Rinse Residue—Oxidation Tank Vent.
6-2
6-8
6-9
6-10
6-11
6-12
6-13
6-14
xvii
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
6-9 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS XAD-2
Resin—Oxidation Tank Vent 6-15
6-10 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS Condensate and First
Impinger--Oxidation Tank Vent 6-16
6-11 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS Probe and Cyclone
Rinse Residue—TCA Scrubber 6-17
6-12 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS 10- and 3-pm
Particulates—TCA Scrubber 6-18
6-13 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS 1-um and Filter
Particulates--TCA Scrubber 6-19
6-14 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS XAD-2 Resin--TCA
Scrubber 6-20
6-15 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, SASS Condensate and First
Impinger--TCA Scrubber 6-21
6-16 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Venturi Filter Cake .... 6-22
6-17 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Venturi Spray Tower
Slurry—Solids 6-23
6-18 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Venturi Spray Tower,
Liquid 6-24
6-19 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, TCA Centrifuge Cake .... 6-25
6-20 Summary of SASS Sampling Data 6-26
6-21 Summary of Stack Gas Conditions During SASS Tests 6-27
6-22 LC Analysis Report 6-28
6-23 LC Analysis Report . 6-29
6-24 LC Analysis Report 6-30
6-25 LC Analysis Report 6-31
6-26 LC Analysis Report 6-32
6-27 LC Analysis Report 6-33
6-28 LC Analysis Report 6-34
6-29 LC Analysis Report 6-35
6-30 LC Analysis Report 6-36
6-31 LC Analysis Report 6-37
6-32 LC Analysis Report 6-38
6-33 LC Analysis Report 6-39
6-34 LC Analysis Report 6-40
6-35 LC Analysis Report 6-41
6-36 LC Analysis Report 6-42
6-37 LC Analysis Report. 6-43
6-38 IR Report, Unfractionated Sample of SASS Probe and Cyclone
Rinse, Venturi Scrubber . . 6-44
6-39 IR Report, Unfractionated SASS 10 + 3 urn Particulate
Extract - Venturi Scrubber 6-44
6-40 IR Report, Unfractionated SASS 1 urn + Filter Particulate
Extract - Venturi Scrubber 6-45
6-41 IR Report, LC Fraction #1 of SASS lp + Filter Particulate
Extract - Venturi Scrubber 6-45
6-42 IR Report, LC Fraction #2 of SASS 1 urn + Filter Particulate
Extract - Venturi Scrubber 6-46
xvi ii
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
6-43 IR Report, LC Fraction #3 of SASS 1 pro + Filter Participate
Extract - Venturi Scrubber 6-46
6-44 IR Report, LC Fraction #4 of 1 urn + Filter Particulate
Extract - Venturi Scrubber 6-47
6-45 IR Report, LC Fraction #5 of 1 urn + Filter Particulate
Extract - Venturi Scubber 6-47
6-46 IR Report, LC Fraction #6 of 1 urn + Filter Particulate
Extract - Venturi Scrubber 6-48
6-47 IR Report, LC Fraction #7 of I urn + Filter Particulate
Extract - Venturi Scrubber 6-48
6-48 IR Report, Unfractionated SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Venturi Scubber 6-49
6-49 IR Report, LC Fraction #1 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Venturi Scrubber 6-49
6-50 IR Report, LC Fraction #2 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Venturi Scrubber 6-50
6-51 IR Report, Fraction 3 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Venturi Scrubber 6-50
6-52 IR Report, LC Fraction #4 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Venturi Scrubber . 6-51
6-53 IR Report, LC Fraction #5 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Venturi Scrubber. 6-51
6-54 IR Report, LC Fraction #6 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Venturi Scrubber 6-52
6-55 IR Report, Fraction #7 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Venturi Scrubber 6-52
6-56 IR Report, Unfractioned Extract of SASS Condensate -
Venturi Scrubber 6-53
6-57 IR Report, Unfractionated Extract of SASS Filter - Oxida-
tion Tank Vent . . 6-53
6-58 IR Report, Unfractioned SASS XAD-2 Extract and Module
Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent 6-54
6-59 IR Report, LC Fraction #1 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent 6-54
6-60 IR Report, LC Fraction #2 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent 6-55
6-61 IR Report, LC Fraction #3 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent 6-55
6-62 IR Report, LC Fraction #4 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent 6-56
6-63 IR Report, LC Fraction #5 of SASS XAD-2 Extract - Module
Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent 6-56
6-64 IR Report, Fraction #6 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent 6-57
6-65 IR Report, LC Fraction #1 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent 6-57
6-66 IR Report, Unfractionated Extract of SASS Condensate -
Oxidation Tank Vent 6-58
xix
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
6-67 IR Report, Unfractionated SASS Probe and Cyclone Rinse -
TCA Scrubber 6-58
6-68 IR Report, Unfractionated Extract of SASS 10 + 3 urn
Particulates - TCA Scrubber 6-59
6-69 IR Report, Unfractionated Extract of SASS 1 urn + Filter
Particulates - TCA Scrubber . . 6-59
6-70 IR Report, Fraction #1 of SASS 1 urn Cyclone + Filter
Extract - TCA Scrubber 6-60
6-71 IR Report, LC Fraction #2 of 1 pm + Filter Particulate
Extract - TCA Scrubber 6-60
6-72 IR Report, LC Fraction #3 of SASS 1 urn + Filter Extract -
TCA Scrubber 6-61
6-73 IR Report, LC Fraction #4 of SASS 1 urn Cyclone + Filter
Extract - TCA Scrubber 6-61
6-74 IR Report, LC Fraction 05 of SASS 1 urn Cyclone Filter
Extract - TCA Scrubber 6-62
6-75 IR Report, LC Fraction #6 of SASS 1 urn Cyclone + Filter -
TCA Scrubber 6-62
6-76 IR Report, Unfractionated SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - TCA Scrubber 6-63
6-77 IR Report, LC Fraction #1 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - TCA Scrubber . . . 6-63
6-78 IR Report, LC Fraction #2 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - TCA Scrubber. 6-64
6-79 IR Report, LC Fraction #3 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - TCA Scrubber 6-64
6-80 IR Report, LC Fraction #4 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - TCA Scrubber 6-65
6-81 IR Report, LC Fraction #5 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - TCA Scrubber 6-65
6-82 IR Report, LC Fraction #6 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - TCA Scrubber 6-66
6-83 IR Report, LC Fraction #7 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module
Rinse - TCA Scrubber. 6-67
6-84 IR Report, Unfractionated Extract of SASS Condensate -
TCA Scrubber 6-68
6-85 IR Report, Unfractionated Extract of Venturi Filter Cake. . 6-68
6-86 IR Report, LC Fraction #1 of Venturi Filter Cake Extract. . 6-68
6-87 IR Report, LC Fraction #2 of Venturi Scrubber Filter
Cake Extract. 6-69
6-88 IR Report, LC Fraction #3 of Venturi Filter Cake Extract. . 6-69
6-89 IR Report, LC Fraction #4 of Venturi Filter Cake Extract. . 6-70
6-90 IR Report, LC Fraction #5 of Venturi Filter Cake Extract. . 6-70
6-91 IR Report, LC Fraction #6 of Venturi Filter Cake Extract. . 6-71
6-92 IR Report, LC Fraction #7 of Venturi Filter Cake Extract. . 6-71
6-93 IR Report, Unfractionated Extract of Venturi Spray
Tower Slurry. 6-72
xx
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
6-94 IR Report, LC Fraction #1 of Venturi Spray Tower Slurry
Extract 6-72
6-95 IR Report, LC Fraction #2 of Venturi Spray Tower Slurry
Extract 6-72
6-96 IR Report, LC Fraction #3 of Venturi Spray Tower Slurry
Extract 6-73
6-97 IR Report, LC Fraction #4 of Venturi Spray Tower Slurry
Extract . . . 6-74
6-98 IR Report, LC Fraction 05 of Venturi Spray Tower Slurry
Extract 6-7!>
6-99 IR Report, LC Fraction #6 of Venturi Spray Tower Slurry
Extract 6-75
6-100 IR Report, LC Fraction #7 of Venturi Spray Tower Slurry
Extract 6-76
6-101 IR Report, Unfractionated Extract of TCA Centrifuge Cake. . 6-76
6-102 LRMS Report, LC Fractions 6 & 7 of SASS 1 urn + Filter
Particulate Extract - Venturi Scrubber 6-77
6-103 LRMS Report, LC Fraction 6 & 7 of SASS XAD-2 + Module
Rinse - Venturi Scrubber 6-78
6-104 LRMS Report, LC Fractions 6 & 7 of SASS XAD-2 + Module
Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent 6-79
6-105 LRMS Report, LC Fractions 6 & 7 of SASS 1 urn + Filter
Particulate Extract - TCA Scrubber 6-80
6-106 LRMS Report, LC Fractions 6 & 7 of Venturi Spray Tower
Slurry Extract 6-81
6-107 SASS Sampling Data Sheets, Venturi Scrubber Outlet 6-82
6-108 SASS Sampling Data Sheets, Oxidation Tank Vent 6-85
6-109 SASS Sampling Data Sheets, TCA Outlet, After Reheat .... 6-87
6-110 SASS Sample Recovery Data Sheets, Venturi Scrubber Outlet . 6-90
6-111 SASS Sample Recovery Data Sheets, Oxidation Tank Vent,
Venturi Scrubber 6-91
6-112 SASS Sample Recovery Data Sheets, TCA Scrubber Outlet . . . 6-92
6-113 SASS Sample Weight Data, Venturi Scrubber 6-93
6-114 SASS Sample Weight Data, Oxidation Tank Vent Pipe,
Venturi Scrubber. 6-95
6-115 SASS Sample Weight Data, TCA Scrubber 6-96
6-116 Process Sampling Data Sheets, Shawnee Steam Plant,
Scrubber Facility 6-98
6-117 Process Sampling Data Sheets, Shawnee Steam Plant,
Scrubber Facility 6-99
6-118 Process Sampling Data Sheets, Shawnee Steam Plant,
Scrubber Facility 6-100
Additional Data
3 SASS Mass Loading and Particule Size Distribution Data. . . 6-102
5 Level 1 Chemical Analyses Performed on Shawnee
Scrubber Samples 6-103
xxi
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
Page
6 Summary of Organic Mass Concentration in SASS and
Scrubber Process Samples 6-105
STUDY 7
7-1 Samples Collected for Preliminary Screening 7-3
Level 1
7-2 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Site A, Quench Liquor ... . . 7-8
7-3 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Site A, Tar 7-9
7-4 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Site A, Cyclone Dust. . . . 7-10
7-5 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Gasifier Ash 7-11
7-6 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Site A, Quench Liquor Extract. 7-12
7-7 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Site A, Tar 7-13
7-8 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Site A, Quench Liquor Extract. 7-13
7-9 LC Analysis Results 7-14 *
7-10 LC Analysis Results 7-15
7-11 LC Analysis Results 7-16
7-12 Organic Extract Summary Table, Site A, Quench Liquor
Extract 7-17
7-15 IR Report, Site A, Quench Liquor Extract 7-18
7-16 IR Report, Site A, Cyclone Dust Extract 7-19
7-17 IR Report, Site A, Tar Extract 7-20
Additional Data
4-1 Organics Extracted From Site A Quench Liquor 7-23
4-6 Organic Extractables in Site A Tar. 7-23
4-11 Results of Dry Screen Test of Site A Cyclone Dust 7-24
4-12 Elemental Composition of Site A Cyclone Dust 7-24
5-1 Sources of Particulates 7-25
5-2 Comparison of Particulate Matter 7-25
xx ii
-------
INTRODUCTION
This document is an accumulation of all available environmental assessment
data published from February 1978 through March 1979.
This document is the second comprehensive compilation of data from the
IERL Phased Environmental Assessment Program. The first data compilation was
published in October 1978 as EPA-600/2-78-211, Compilation of Level 1 Environ-
mental Assessment Data. As in the first data compilation, the primary purpose
of this compilation is to permit those involved in environmental assessment
X
programs to evaluate the quality and quantity of data generated by the phased
approach. It is felt that critical reviews of these data may lead to improve-
ments in procedures, data formatting, data storage, and data interpretation.
Although conclusions related to specific sources or source types may have been
,>
abstracted from the references to provide background information, the focus of
this presentation is on data resulting from the Level 1 sampling and analytical
methods. The interested reader should consult the referenced documents for
more details and conclusions concerning pollutant sources, control techniques,
etc.
The phased environmental assessment program, developed by the Industrial
Environmental Research Laboratory (IERL) of the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) at Research Triangle Park (RTP), North Carolina, is divided into
three levels. Level 1 is the survey step to determine which samples from an
environmental assessment might be hazardous or toxic. Level 1 also serves to
establish the priority of samples and rank samples for further testing. When
the Level 1 sampling and analysis scheme shows the possible presence of hazards,
a Level 2 scheme is initiated to specifically identify and quantify suspected
hazardous materials. If Level 2 reveals pollutants capable of environmental
detriment, then a Level 3 scheme is begun to evaluate control technologies and
to assess long-term effects.
Fourteen studies have been identified that contain phased environmental
assessment data; these studies are organized alphabetically by source types in
xxi ii
-------
this compilation. It should be noted that each study included in this compila-
tion will be identified as final draft, preliminary draft, etc., based on the
completeness of the study summarized; therefore, absence of data does not
necessarily indicate analysis was not performed but that the study was possibly
not complete when it became necessary to compile the data. In each study,
mention is made of methods used if they differ from the methodology specified
in the IERL-RTP Procedures Manual: Level 1 Environmental Assessment (Second
Edition), EPA-600/7-78-201.
Within each study, information is organized in the following manner:
I. Summary of the study
II. Level 1 data
A. Inorganic analysis data
1. Spark source mass spectroscopy (SSMS)
2. Atomic absorption (AA) wet chemical methods--Hg, As, Sb
3. Gas chromatography for inorganic gases
4. Chemiluminescence for NO
A
5. Anion analysis
6. Aqueous analyses for pH, acidity, alkalinity, BOD, COD,
DO, conductivity, dissolved and suspended solids, and
other selected physical parameters
B. Organic analysis data
1. Gas chromatography for gases, b.p. <100° C (Cj-C?)
2. Gas chromatography for gases, b.p. >100° C (C,-C17)
3. LC fractionation
4. IR1
5. Low resolution mass spectrometry (LRMS)
III. Level 2 data
IV. Additional data
Data in categories III and IV are photocopied from the referenced docu-
ments. Level 1 data are presented in standard format.
xx iv
-------
STUDY NUMBER 1
DATA
SOURCE:
LEVEL 2 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
OF FLUIDIZED-BED COMBUSTOR
SAMPLES
DATA
STATUS:
EPA-600/7-79-0635, February 1979
AUTHORS:
CONTRACTOR:
L. E. Ryan, R. G. Beimer, and R. F. Maddalone
TRW, Inc.
Defense and Space Systems Group
One Space Park
Redondo Beach, California 90278
PROJECT
OFFICER:
Walter B. Steen
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
1-1
-------
This report presents results of a preliminary Level 2 chemical analysis,
conducted by TRW on a set of particulate samples from the Battelle 6-in.
fluidized-bed combustion (FBC) unit. This Level 2 effort followed the
approach described in a previous document by TRW,1 and was a test of newly
developed procedures and techniques. These particulate samples plus other
samples from the FBC minipiant had been collected and analyzed by a Level 1
protocol by Battelle Columbus Laboratories (BCL). The samples subjected to
Level 2 were from BCL's sampling run No. 2. The BCL study2 was summarized
in a previous data compilation3 as Study No. 12, which contains schematics
and process descriptions.
The TRW report also presents an analysis of decision criteria for
proceeding from Level 1 to Level 2 and a detailed series of flow charts for
the application of Level 2 inorganic analytical techniques. Tables 1-1 and
1-2 (from the document) summarize the organic and inorganic Level 1 data
assessments and Level 2 chemical analyses.
The Level 2 inorganic analysis scheme was divided into three phases and
results for each phase were summarized as follows:
I. Initial Sample Characterization
Samples were found to be "highly stable and mostly inorganic
in composition; relatively uniform in morphology; and without
optically identifiable crystalline materials." Atomic absorption
spectrophotometry adequately quantitated cations present in the
samples.
II. Bulk Composition Characterization
The samples were found to contain these major constituents:
Fe203, Si02, CaS04-2H20, CaS04*%H20, CaS04 (anhydrous) CaS, CaO,
and CaC03 (vaterite and calcite forms).
III. Individual Particle Characterization
Bulk composition results were confirmed. Discrete respirable
particles of Si02 were also identified.
Detailed discussions of inorganic analytical techniques were presented.
1-2
-------
• inout 11. UHunnii aunnHKT
Level 1 assessment
Level 1 organic NEC categor
graphic (LC) fraction sHH •
requiring Le»et 2 Probable
analysts category
LC 1 Organcwe tallies
LC 2 and 3 Unsaturated
alkyl halites
Halogenerated
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Benzene, substitute
Benzene
Fused aromatic
hydrocarbons
Fused nonalternate
polycyclic hydrocarbons
LC 4 and 5 Heterocyclic sulfur
LC 6 and 7 Amines
Hercaptans, sul fides
Halophenols
Nitrophenols
Meterocyctic
Nitrogen
TflBS& AITf) t_KA fftrw&nf •*•>*•{_._. -J_A J j .
Level 2 data
'"'* MEG compoum
*tL?. identified
»»9/"3 MEG
concentrations* category
7-6 x IO2 Aliphatic
hydrocarbons
1.3 x IO3 Aliphatic
hydrocarbons
Esters
Fused aromatic
hydrocarbons
Fused nonalternate
polycyclic hydrocarbons
6.6 x ioz Esters
1.2 x io3 Esters
Unknown (1)
Unknown (2)
• ,
is
MEG
compound
Alkanes (C > 9)
Alkanes (C > 9)
Phthalates**
1,2 Bcnzan-
tnracene
Phenanthrene
Methyl anthra-
cene
Pyrene
Naphthalene
Benzo fluoran-
thene.
f luoranthene
Phthalates**
Phthalates**
Molecular
weight 176
Hydrocarbons
Molecular
weight 394
MO/"3
concentration
Total PER
PER compound LC fractions
1.9 x IO3 1.9 x IO3
7.7 x io2
1-2 x io2
-2.8 x 10
1-7 x 10* 1.5 x 10s
1.2 x IO2
3.5 x 10
1.5 x 10
1.9 x 10
2.1 x io3 2.1 x io3
8.7 x io2
2.4 x io2 2.0 x IO3
8.7 x io2
**0nly compound which EXCEEDS MATES
-------
TABLE 1-2. INORGANIC SUHHARY
Level 1 assessment
Inorganic MEG
category requiring
Level 2 analyses
Lithiuei
Sodiun
Potass ilia
Beryl HUB
Magnesium
Calcium
Strontiiai
BariuB
AltMiniM -
Thallium
Silicon
Lead
Nitrogen
Phosphorus
Arsenic
MEG compounds
sought in Level
Probable
compound
Li, Li*, Li2C03
Na*
X*
Be**, BeO, BeO-Al2Oj-SI02
Hg**, MgO. HgS04. MgC03>
MgC03.CaC03
Ca**, CaC03, CaS04
Sr**, SrS04
Ba, BaC03, BaS04
•A1*3, A1203. A1203-3H20
T>
Si04"2, SiOj"2, Si02, SiC
Pb*2, Pb*4, PbO. PbS04,
PbC03, Pbj(P04)2
NO/. N02-
P03"3. P04"3
As*3. As*5. As04"3. As03"3.
AS2°3
2
MS/*3
concentration*
2.
5.
2.
4.
3 «
7 x
6 x
1
9.8 x
1.
4.
1.
9.
1.
3.
9.
1.
1.
2.
3 x
3 x
6 x
4 x
6 x
5 x
5 x
8 x
1 «
3 x
10^
IO4
IO5
IO4
IO6
IO3
IO4
IO5
IO2
IO6
IO2
IO5
IO3
IO1
Level 2 data
MEG compounds
identified
(indicated)
Li, Li*
Na*. (Na20)
K*
none detected
(HgO), Mg**. (MgS04)
Ca**, CaC03, CaS04, C*S. (CaO)
Sr**, (SrS04)
none detected
A1*3. (AW
none detected
Si.
-------
TABLE 1-2. (continued)
Level 1 assessment
Inorganic ICG
category requiring
Level 2 analyses
Sulfur
Wr1u»
Titanium
Zirconium
Vanadium
Chromium
Manganese
Iron
Cobalt
Rhodium
Nickel
Copper
MEG compounds
sought In Level
Probable
compound
s'z, so4"z, so3'z
Y*3
+1 4-A
Ti*3, Ti*4, T102
Zr*4, Zr02
V*3, VO*2. VO,-4, V03.
vo, vo. v2o3. v2o4,
V205, VOS04-5H20
Cr*2, Cr*3, CrO "2, Cr 0 "2,
Cr,0,, FeO Cr-O,, FeCrtK
Mn , Mn , MnO * , MnO ,
Hn02, MnC03, MnS04
Fe*2, Fe*3. FeO-Fe^, FeS.
Fe203. KFeS1206
CO/*2, CO*3, CoCo3-4H20, CoO
Rh*3
Mi*2, Hi*3, M10
Cu*, Cu*2, CuO, Cu.O,
2
M9/I
•»
concentration*
2.2 x
8.5 x
2.7 x
3.5 x
9.8 x
Z.I x
3.8 x
4.3 x
1.9 x
2.1 x
3.8 x
9.7 x
IO4
IO3
a
IO4
IO3
IO3
IO3
IO3
IO5
IO2
IO2
IO3
IO2
Level 2 data
MEG compounds
identified MS/*3
(Indicated) concentration
S*2, S04~2, SOj'2 not determined
none detected
none detected
Zr*4, (Zr02) 2.0 x IO1 (as Zr)
V. (V04~4, V203, V204. V205, 2.6 x IO3 (as V) exceeds MATE
VOS04-5H20)
Cr, Cr*2. Cr*3. (CrO "2, Cr 0 ~Z, 8.3 x IO3 (as Cr) exceeds MATE
Cr2S3. Cr03
Mn*2. Mn*3. (MnO,, 1.3 x IO2 (as Hn)
Mn02, MnCOj, MnS04)
Fe*3, Fe203, (FeS) 5.6 x lo2 (as Fe)
none detected
none detected
none detected
CU*. Cu*2, (CuO, CuSO.., 4.6 x IO1 (as Cu)
CuS04, CuC03
CuC03)
-------
TABLE 1-2. (continued)
Level 1
assessment Level 2 data
MEG compounds
sought 1n Ltvel 2 '
Inorganic MEG
category requiring
Level 2 analyses
CactafuM
Uranium
Stiver
Zinc
MBrcury
Cd*Z
u
not
not
not
Probable
compound
, CdO
required
required
required
MEG compounds
MO/*3 identified
concentration* (Indicated)
<6.0 x ifl1 Cd
6.4 x 101 not determined
Ag
2n, (ZnO. ZnS04> ZnS)
Hg
Mg/«a
concentration
5.0 (as Cd)
3.9 x 102 (as
6.6 x 103 (as
9. 3 x 102 (as
Ag) exceeds HATE
Zn) exceeds HATE
Hg) exceeds NATE
*These are the concentrations determined by the Level 1 SSMS. The SSMS Level 1 data are not expected to be accurate for ujor components
(>100 pp», >5 x 10*
I
cr>
-------
The Level 2 organic analysis was performed according to the scheme
outlined in Figure 1-1 (from the report). Table 1-3 (from the report)
summarizes results of the organic analysis.
Samples in the data tables are encoded as follows:
S-2-1 Illinois Coal No. 6 (feed coal)
S-2-2 Grove Limestone (feed for sorbent bed)
S-2-3 Overflow Bed Material > 325 mesh
S-2-4 Overflow Bed Material < 325 mesh
S-2-5 Sludge (solids from aqueous scrubber system in effluent
gas line)
S-2-6 Particulates > 27 u (from process cyclone)
S-2-7 Particulates < 27 u (from cyclone and filter of a modified
Method 5 train)
An A or B after the sample code number indicates an acidic or basic
leachate. A number indicates an LC fraction number.
In this study, Level 2 analysis was run where the Level 1 analysis was
within a factor of three of the appropriate MATE value. All Level 1 and
Level 2 data are presented in the TRW Level 1-Level 2 data reduction tables.
The table titled "Total Emission Data" is the summation of results from
samples S-2-5, S-2-6, and S-2-7.
Results of the following Level 2 analytical techniques are reported in
the "initial sample characterization" phase.
1. Photomicrographs of particulates
2. Descriptions of particulates as observed through a microscope
3. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA)
4. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry (AA)
5. Induction coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICPOES)
Results from quantisation of cations by AA and ICPOES were combined
with a list of possible compounds for the processes involved and were used
to estimate the quantities of these compounds present in the samples.
The "bulk composition characterization" phase of the inorganic analysis
utilized these methods:
1. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR)
2. Electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis (ESCA)
3. X-ray powder diffraction (XRD)
Results of this phase were used to confirm or refute the presence of com-
pounds from the list of possible compounds generated in the initial phase.
1-7
-------
LEVEL 2 ORGANIC ANALYSIS OF FBC SAMPLES
(SOLID ^\
SAMPLES^/
METHY
CHLOD
EXTRA*
i
1ENE
mON
CONCENTRATE
SAMPLE
i
IML
/VOLATILITY/*- °C/MS
i
-
2 ML
fc GC/M5 A ")
I VOLATILE /
/ ORGAN! CS/
1 ML /" ' ' 7
/Ml*»lM /
SOLID ^CHROMATO-/
PROM HRMS ^ GRAPHABLE /
4.3
LIQUID
CHROMATO-
GRAPH
GC/MS
FRACTIONS
COLUMN AND
CONDITIONS
SET FOR EACH
LC FRACTION
4.4
Figure 1-1. Level 2 organic analysis scheme.
1-8
-------
TABLE 1-3.
MEG
1.
80.
21.
22.
category
Aliphatic
hydrocarbons
Esters
Fused aromatic
hydrocarbons
Fused non-
alternate poly-
cyclic hydro-
carbons
Compound
Alkanes
(C>9)
Phthalates
Benza(a)anthracene
Phenanthrene
Naphthalene"
Anthracene, methyl
anthracene
Pyrene
Benzofluor-
anthrene
Fluoranthrene
MATE
air
Mg/m3
N
5.00 x io3
4.45 x 10
1.59 x IO3
5.00 x IO4
5.60 x IO4
2.33 x 10s
6.48 x io3
9.00 x IO4
FBC
emission
samples*
MQ/m3
8.0 x lo2
3.1 x io«
2.8 x 10
1.7 x IO2
1.5 x IO2
1.2 x IO2
3.5 x 10
1.0 x 10
1.3 x IO2
Comments
No MATE avail-
able for
assessment
Exceeds MATE
Does not
exceed MATE
Does not
exceed MATE
Does not
exceed MATE
Does not
exceed MATE
Does not
exceed MATE
Does not
exceed MATE
Does not
exceed MA IE
*Summation of S-2-5, S-2-6, and S-2-7.
1-9
-------
The."individual particle characterization" phase used these analytical
methods:
1. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with energy dispersive analysis
of X-rays (EDX)
2. Electron beam microprobe (EPMA)
3. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
4. Selected area electron diffraction (SAED)
SEM-EDX and EPMA results generally confirmed the results from earlier
phases. TEM-SAED results were inconclusive except for sample S-2-3, which
showed respirable particles of silica.
Level 2 organic analysis was performed using the following techniques:
1. Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) [with impact (or FI)
ionization]
Performed on unfractionated CH2Cl2 extract for general charac-
terization and quantisation plus identification of some
specific polynuclear organic materials (POM).
Performed on fractionationated samples from the CH2C12 concen-
trate to characterize low-volatility components.
2. Solid probe low resolution mass spectrometry (LRMS)
Performed on concentrated CH2C12 extract to determine nonvola-
tile components.
3. GC/MS [with chemical (or CI) ionization]
Performed on LC fractions where components were not identi-
fied by GC/MS/EI techniques.
It was noted that GC/MS/C1 was of little value in identifying compounds
that could not be detected by GC/MS/EI.
1-10
-------
REFERENCES
1. L. E. Ryan, R. G. Beimer, and R. F. Maddalone, Approach to Level 2 Analysis
Based on Level 1 Results, MEG Categories and Compounds and Decision Criteria,
EPA Contract #68-02-26-13, 1978.
2. J. M. Allen, J. E. Howes, Jr., S. E. Miller, and K. M. Duke, Comprehensive
Analysis of Emissions from Exxon Fluidized-Bed Combustion Miniplant Unit,
Draft dated September 9, 1977, EPA Project Officer 0. B. Henschel.
3. N. H. Gaskins, and F. W. Sexton, Compilation of Level 1 Environmental
Assessment Data. EPA-600/2-78-211, October 1978.
1-11
-------
LEVEL 1
1-12
-------
TABLE 1-4. ATOMIC ABSORPTION (AA) ANALYSIS
Sample
S-2-3
S-2-4
S-2-5
S-2-6
S-2-7-2
S-2-7-3
As Hg
<0.8
*
441
12
176
87
Sb
*Not determined. Based on MATE values, this was not required
in the Level 2 effort.
TABLE 1-5. ATOMIC ABSORPTION (AA) ANALYSIS
(_mg/L)
Sample As Hg Sb
Acidic solution
S-2-1-A <0.0002
S-2-2-A 0.0002
S-2-3-A <0.0002
S-2-6-A <0.0002
Basic solution
S-2-1-B <0.0002
S-2-2-B <0.0002
S-2-3-B <0.0002
S-2-6-B <0.0002
1-13
-------
TABLE 1-6. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
RUN #2, SAMPLE S-2-3
Gas
Range
Volatile
weight, ppm
No. of
peaks
GC7
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
64,1
TABLE 1-7. GAS CWWIATOSWWW AHM.YSI5
RUN #2, SAWtE £-*-*
•_• —
Gas
GC7
GC8
GC9
U v «•*
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
=^ Illl "- '
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
Volati
weight,
0
0
822.
219.
0
0
0
2,000.
1e
ppm
0
0
0
No. of
peaks
1-14
-------
TABLE 1-8. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
RUN #2, SAMPLE S-2-5
Volatile No. of
Gas Range weight, ppm peaks
GC7
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
0
0
0
16.
0
0
0
5,323.
6
0
TABLE 1-9. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
RUN #2, SAMPLE S-2-6
Volatile No. of
Gas Range weight, ppm peaks
GC7 90-110 0
GC8 110-140 0
GC9 140-160 0
GC10 160-180 0
GC11 180-200 0
GC12 200-220 0
GC13 0
GC14
241 4
GC16 ' ^
GC17
1-15
-------
TABLE 1-10. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
RUN #2, SAMPLE $-2-7
Volatile No. of
Gas Range weight, ppm peaks
GC7 90-110 0
GC8 110-140 0
GC9 140-160 0
GC10 160-180 0
GC11 180-200 0
GC12 200-220 0
GC13 0
GC14
GC17
TABLE 1-11. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
RUN #2, SAMPLE S-2-1
Volatile No. of
Gas Range weight, ppm peaks
GC7
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
0
4,518.
0
0
0
0
0
17,642.
0
0
1-16
-------
TABLE 1-12. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
RUN #2, SAMPLE S-2-2
Gas
GC7
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
Volatile
weight, ppm
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
35.0
No. of
peaks
LC fractionation for Fly Ash NBS Sample #1633 showed 0 throughout all
categories.
1-17
-------
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS
The overflow bed, sludge, and the participate samples (S-2-4-1, S-2-5,
S-2-7-2, and S-2-7-3) were agglomerates of gray and sand colored materials.
The smallest cluster, and some individual particles, were about 15u in diamete
There were also traces of white and red materials.
S-2-7-2 contained some unusually large materials, which are described
below:
Color Shape Size (u) Comments
White, opaque Trapezoidal 150 * 220 Observed numerous
parallel lines in
particle, suggest
crystalline material
Yellow Rectangular 90 x 100
230 x 305
This sample also contained a few long, narrow rod like objects, all about
500u x 40u.
S-2-7-3 contained traces of fibrous appearing material and bright, sh'n^
maybe metallic particles.
The bulk of particles in the emission samples S-2-5, S-2-6, and S-2-7 w<
uniform in character and comparable to one another.
-------
TABLE 1-13.
LC FRACTIONATION
SAMPLE:
S-2-1
Total S«mplib
Talita for LCC
Racovaiau
TCO
mg
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TCO'
mg
GRAV
mg
36.0* (51.0%)
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration1
mg/ (m3, L, or kg)
8,969.1*
GRAV"
mg
8.0
2.2
3.0
4.8
5.2
11.2
0.3
TCO i- GRAV
total mg
Concentration*
mg/ (m3, L or kg)
*amp7p
1,993.0
548.0
747.4
1,196.0
1,296.0
2,790.0
74.7
*Sum includes LC8 (1,300 yg; 324 yg/g) no longer included in Level 1 procedures,
* Quantity in antira sample, datatminad bafora LC.
• Portion of whota samplt mad for LC, actual mg.
e QnantitY rteowrad from LC cowm*. actual mg.
Total mg eamairtad back to total tampla.
* Vahm nppliad for both tampla sbo anal concantritJon.
f NotdttactaWi.
1-Jf
-------
TABLE 1-14.
LC FRACTIONAT1ON
SAMPLE:
S-2-3
Total Sample"
Taken for LCC
Recovered
TCO
mg
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
B
7
TCO*
mfl
GRAV
mg
1.3* (203%)
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration3
mg/ (m^, L, or kg)
130.0*
GRAV*
mg
0
0.3
0
0
0
0.3
0.5
TC0 1- GRAV
totaling
Concentration8
m9^h>orkg)
0
30
0
0
0
30.0 |
50.0
*Sum includes LC8 (200 yg; 20 yg/g) no longer included in Level 1
procedures.
1 Quantity in entire temple, datarmlnad before LC.
Portion of whole sample used for LC, actual mg.
e Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg.
d Total ntg computed back to total sample.
* Vetoes supplied for both sample rate and concentration.
f Not detectable.
4-20
-------
TABLE 1-15.
LC FRACTIONATION
SAMPLE:
S-2-4
Total Simpltb
TakanforLCc
Rtcovtnd
TCQ
mg
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TCO" v
mg
GRAV
m|
1.8* (246%)
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration*
mg/ (m3, L, or kg)
3,747.0*
GRAV*
mg
0
0
0
0.2
0.2
0.5
0.8
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration8
mg/ (m3.!, or kg)
<:ampfp
0
0
0
549.0
549.0
183.0
2,192.0
*Sum includes LC8 (100 iig; 274 yg/g) no longer included in Level 1 procedures.
1 Quantity in twtfra tamplf, dittrmiiwd b«fora LC.
* Portion of whola samplo mod for LC, actual mg.
q Quantity rtco
-------
TABLE 1-16.
LC FRACTIONATION
SAMPLE:
S-2-5
-
Total Sampla*
Taken far LCC
Rocovaradd
TCO
m|
.
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TCO-
m|
6RAV
mi
10.75* (51.0%)
TCO + GRAV
totaling
Coneatitration8
m|/ (m3, 1, or kg)
2,711.8*
ORAV*
mg
1.6
0
1.8
1.1
1.1
3.0
0.4
TCO + GRAV
total m|
Concentration*
mg/ (m3. L or hg>
<;amplp
416
0
454
277.4
277.4
757.0
101.0
*Sum Includes LC8 (1,700 pg; 429 ng/g) no longer included in Level 1 procedure
' Quantity in antira sampla, detannlnad batara LC.
b Portion of wfcota tamola nod for LC, actval imj.
c Qvaatrty raco»arad from LC cotemn, actual ma.
* Total mi compotad bock to total sampla.
* Vakw wpBlW for bath lampra tin and concantntion.
f
NotdatactaUa.
1*22
-------
TABLE 1-17.
LC FRACTIONATION
SAMPLE:
S-2-6
Total Sample*
TikinforLCc
Recovered
TCO
mg
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TCO'
mg
6RAV
mg
0.8* (84.2%)
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration3
mg/ (m3, L.orkg)
203.3*
6RAV*
mg
0
0.1
0
0.3
0
0.2
0.1
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration3
mg/ (m3, L, or kg)
c a nin 1 o
0
25.4
0
76.3
0
50.8
25.4
*Sum Includes LC8 (100 ug; 25.4 ug/g) no longer included in Level 1 procedures
' Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC.
b Portion of whole sample mod for LC, actual mg.
c Quantity recovered from LC cohimn, actual mg.
d Total mg computed back to total sample.
* Vahm supplied tar both sample size and concentration.
f Not detectable. •>
1-23
-------
TABLE 1-18.
LC FRACTIONATION
SAMPLE:
S-2-7
Total Samplo*
TafconforLCc
Rocovtrod
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TCO
mi
TCO"
«t
6RAV
Rlf
1.5* (152.0%)
GRAV*
mg
0
0.4
0.2
0.1
0
0.8
0
TCO * GRAV
totaling
TCO + GRAV
total am
Concentration3
mg/ (m3. L. or kg)
2,812.0*
Concentration*
mg/ (n>3 1, or kg)
samite
0
750.0
375.0
187.0
0
1,500.0
0
*Sum Includes LC8 no longer Included 1n Level 1 procedures
* Quantity In mtira samplo, dottrminod befort 1C.
b Portion of wfcoto samplo mod for LC, irtul mg.
6 Quontfty rwovmd from LC cotornn, actual mg.
- Total mg eamn*tad back to total sampta.
' Vataa* wppHad for both samplo sin and concontratioiL
1-24
-------
LC fractionation for Sample S-2-2 was "not conducted; sample size
not adequate."
LC fractionation for Fly Ash Sample (NBS #1633) showed '0' throughout
all categories.
1-25
-------
TABLE 1-19.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
S-2-6
Wm Numfaar
(em'1)
250t
175t
120t
- -
410t
200t
320t
1100-1190*
725*
670*
61 0*
595*
800+
780*
460*
410*
Intensity
major
major
major
medium
medi urn
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medi urn
low
low
low
low
•
Assignmtnt/Comnwnts
CaSOd • h H90
CaS04 • h H20
CaS04 • h H20
Fe3°4
Fe304 |
•
CaS04 • 2HZ0
CaSO* • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
CaSO^ • 2H20 and CaSO^ (anhydrous)
CaS04 • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
CaS04 • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
CaS04 • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
S102
SlOo
sio2
Fe,0,
•
OTHER REMARKS:
*major
medium 5-10%
low 1-5%
trace <1%
tFar-lnfrared spectral region.
*M1d-infrared spectral region.
1-26
-------
SAMPLE:
S-2-3
TABLE 1-20.
«R REPORT
WntNmnbir
(em*1)
1100-1190
725
670
610
1400
875 (side peak
850)
740
710
Intensity *
major
major
major
major
medium
medium
medium
medium
Atsignmmt/ComiMnts
CaS04 • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
CaS04 • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
CaS04 • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
CaS04 • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
CaC03 (vaterite)
CaC03 (vaterite)
CaCOj (vaterite)
CaC03 (vaterite)
OTHER REMARKS:
*major
medium 5-10%
low 1-5%
trace <1%
Note: Mid-infrared spectra region.
1-27
-------
TABLE 1-21.
IR REPORT
CAUOI P. S-2-4
Wm Nwnbir
(em'1)
1400
875
715
1100-1190
725
670
610
595
800
780
Intensity *
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
medium
low
low
AsMinnMnt/Commtflts
CaCO^ (caldte)
CaCO^ (calclte)
CaC03 (calclte)
CaS04 • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
CaS04 • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
CaS04 • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
CaS04 • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
CaS04 • 2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
S102 (crystalline)
S102 (crystalline)
j
OTHER REMARKS:
*major
medium 5-10%
low 1-5%
trace
-------
SAMPLE:
S-2-5
TABLE 1-22.
IR REPORT
Wm Nwnbtr
(em'1)
1050 (broad)
800
780
695
460
Intimity *
ma^'or
major
major
major
major
Anignmtnt/Commints
Si02 (crystal line)\
Si02 (crystalline)
S102 (crystalline)
Si02 (crystalline)
Si02 (crystalline)
OTHER REMARKS:
*major
medium 5-10%
low 1-5%
trace <1%
Note: Mid-infrared spectra region.
1-29
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 1-23.
IR REPORT
S-2-7-2 and S-2-7-3
Wm Numbir
(em'1)
Intimity
Assignimfrt/Commmts
1100 (broad)
medium
S10r
800
medium
SiO,
780
medium
SiO,
460
medium
SiO,
1100-1190
not reported
CaSOA • 2HgO and CaS04 (anhydrous)
725
not reported
CaSO/i • 2H00 and CaSO. (anhydrous)
H £. *r
CaSOd • 2HP0 and CaSOA (anhydrous)
CaSOA * 2H?0 and CaSOA (anhydrous)
CaSO. • 2H50 and CaSOA (anhydrous)
670
not reported
610
not reported
2H?0 and CaSOA (anhydrous)
2H20 and CaS04 (anhydrous)
595
POt
OTHER REMARKS:
*major
medium 5-10%
low 1-5%
trace <1%
Note: Mid-infrared spectra region.
1-30
-------
SAMPLE:
S-2-1. >C13
TABLE 1-24.
IR REPORT
Wave Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
major
medium
minor
trace
Assignment Comments
aliphatic hydrocarbon
aromatic hydrocarbon
water
ester
•*
SAMPLE:
S-2-2, >C13
IR REPORT
Wave Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
major
minor
trace
•
Assignment Comments
aliphatic hydrocarbon
water
ester
NR = not reported.
1-31
-------
SAMPLE:
S-2-3. >C13
TABLE 1-25.
IR REPORT
Wave Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
major
medium
minor
trace
Assignment Comments
aliphatir hydrocarbon
aromatic hvdrocarbon
water
ester
-
,
:
I
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
S-2-4, >C13
Wave Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
major
medium
minor
trace
•
Assignment Comments
aliphatic hydrocarbon
aromatic hydrocarbon
water
ester
*!
5
HTTE: Spectr* for S-2-3, S-t-4, S-2-5, S-2-6* «itd S-2-7 were jwnesented in
in
NR a not reported.
-------
TABLE 1-26.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
S-2-5. >C13
Wtvt Numbtr
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
maior
medium
minor
trace
Assignment Comments
j
aliphatic hydrocarbon
aromatic hydrocarbon
ester
water
i
SAMPLE:
S-2-6. >C13
IR REPORT
Wave Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
major
medium
minor
trace
'•
•
Assignment Comments
aliphatic hydrocarbons
aromatic hydrocarbons
ester
water
1
i
!
NOTE: Spectra for S-2-3, S-2-4, S-2-5, S-2-6, and S-2-7 were presented in
the document. ^.33
NR = not reported.
-------
TABLE 1-27.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
5-2-7. >C13
Wm Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
maior
medi urn
minor
trace
Assignment Comments
aliphatic hydrocarbons
aromatic hydrocarbons
water
ester
SAMPLE:
IR REPORT
Wive Number
(cm'1)
Intensity
Assignment
Comments
NOTE: Spectra for S-2-3, S-2-4, S-2-5, S-2-6, and S-2-7 were presented in
the document. j_34
NR = not reported.
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 1-28. IR REPORT
S-2-1. LC fractionation
Wm Numbff
(em'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
major
medium
minor
trace
major
medium
mi nor
trace
major
medium
minor
trace
major
medium
minor
trace
major
med i urn
minor
trace
Assignmint/Commtnts
LC fraction
number
1 aliphatic hydrocarbon
aromatic hydrocarbon
water
ester
2 aliphatic hydrocarbon
aromatic hydrocarbon
water
ester
3 aromatic hydrocarbons
halogenated aromatic
water
ester
4 ether
halogenated aromatic
water
ester
5 phenol
halogenated aromatic
water
ester
OTHER REMARKS:
Note: Spectra for S-2-3, S-2-4, S-2-5, S-2-6, and S-2-7 were presented in
the document.
NR = not reported.
1-M
-------
SAMPLE:
S-2-1
TABLE 1-29. 1R REPORT
.C fractionatlon
Wm Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
major
medium
minor
trace
major
medium
minor
trace
major
medium
minor
trace
Assignment/Comments
LC fraction
number
6 phenol
carboxylic acid
water
ketone
7 carboxylic acid
phenol
water
ketone
8 water
carboxylic acid
water I
ketone
OTHER REMARKS:
Note: Spectra for S-2-3, S-2-4, S-2-5, S-2-6, and S-2-7 were presented in
the document.
NR = not reported.
1-36
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 1-30. IR REPORT
S-2-3. 1C frartlnnatinn
Wm Numbtr
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
major
trace
trace
major
trace
major
medium
Assignment/Comments
LC
fraction
1 NR
2 ester, phthalate
3 no Infrared activity
4 aliphatic hydrocarbon
5 allohatic hydrocarbon
6 acid, phthalate
7 aliphatic hydrocarbon
8 water
carboxylic acid
•
OTHER REMARKS:
Note: Spectra for S-2-3, S-2-4, S-2-5, S-2-6, and S-2-7 were presented in
the document.
NR = not reported.
1-37
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 1-31. IR REPORT
S-2-4. LC fractionation
Wsvt Numbtr
(em'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
major
medi urn
major
medium
trace
major
medi urn
trace
major
major
medi urn
major
medi urn
major
medium
Assignmtnt/Comments
LC
fraction
1 NR
2 aliphatic hydrocarbons
aromatic hydrocarbon
3 aromatic hydrocarbon
aliphatic hydrocarbon
ester
4 ester
halogenated aromatic
water
5 phenol
6 phenol
carboxylic acid
7 carboxylic acid
water
8 carboxylic acid
water
OTHER REMARKS:
Note: Spectra for S-2-3, S-2-4, S-2-5, S-2-6, and S-2-7 were presented in
the document.
NR = not reported.
1-38
-------
MPLE:
TABLE 1-32. IR REPORT
S-2-5. LC fractionation
Wavt Numbtr
(em'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
major
medi urn
major
medium
mi nor
ma.ior
medi urn
minor
trace
major
major
medium
major
medium
major
medium
Assignment/Comments
LC
fraction
1 NR
2 aromatic hydrocarbon
halogenated aromatic
hydrocarbons
3 aromatic hydrocarbon
ester
halogenated aromatic
hydrocarbons
4 NR
5 aromatic hydrocarbon
halogenated aromatic
hydrocarbons
ester
carboxylic acid
6 carboxylic add
ester
water
7 carboxylic acid
water
8 water
carboxylic acid
IHER REMARKS:
Note: Spectra for S-2-3, S~2-4, S-2-5, S-2-6, and S-2-7 were presented in
the document.
NR = not reported.
1-39
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 1-33. IR REPORT
S-2-6. 1C fractionation
W«vt Numbtr
(cm*1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intimity
major
medi urn
major
medium
medium
major
major
medium
major
medium
major
medi urn
minor
major
medium
minor
Assignment/Commiim
LC
fraction
1 aliphatic hydrocarbon
aromatic hydrocarbon
2 aliphatic hydrocarbon
aromatic hydrocarbon
3 halogenated aromatic
4 ester
5 phenol
ester
6 ester
phenol
7 carboxylic acid
water
ester
8 water
carboxylic acid
ester
OTHER REMARKS:
Note: Spectra for S-2-3, S-2-4, S-2-5, S-2-6, and S-2-7 were presented 1»
the document.
NR » not reported.
1-40
-------
1APLE:
TABLE 1-34. IR REPORT
S-2-7. 1C fractionation
Wm Numbtr
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
major
medium
medium
medium
trace
trace
major
major
Attionmant/Commints
LC
f racti on
1 aliphatic hydrocarbon
aromatic hydrocarbon
2 aromatic hydrocarbon
3 aromatic hydrocarbon
4 ester
5 aliphatic hydrocarbon
6 ester
phthalate
7 no infrared activity
8 no infrared activity
THER REMARKS:
Note: Spectra for S-2-3, S-2-4. S-2-S» S-2-6, and S-2-7 were f-presented 'in
the document.
NR » not reported.
LC fractionation not conducted on sample S-2-2.
1-41
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE; S-2-1
TABLE 1-35
Major Cittforits
Intamity
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Ctttflory
free sulfur,
trans-1-2-3 trimethyl-4 propenyl -naphthalene,
1 ,2-dimethyl -4-benzyl benzene ,
2-methyl anthracene,
1-methylphenanthrene, triphenyl benzene,
1,2, 4, 5-tetra1sopropyl benzene, and others
MW Rinci
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
Sub-CattgorMs, Specific Compounds
Inttnsity
Cattfory
m/a
Composition
.
Othvr
Comments: very complex spectra of high molecular weight aliphatic and substituted
aromatic compounds, all of which have not been identified.
NR = not reported.
1-42
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE; S-2-3
TABLE 1-36
Major Categories
Intensity
NR
NR
NR
NR
Category
1-octadecene
1-heptadecene
1-hexadecene
1-dodecene
MW Range
NR
NR
NR
NR
Sub-Categories, Spttific Compounds
Intensity
Category
m/e
Composition
Other
Comments: very small sample residue with only a trace of hydrocarbons and a
trace of phthalate ester.
NR = not reported.
1-43
-------
TABLE 1-37
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE:
S-2-4
Major Cattgorits
Intansity
NR
Cattgory
1-octadecene
MW Ranga
NR
NR
1-hexadecene
NR
Sub-Cattgorits. Specific Compounds
Intensity
Category
Composition
Other
Comments: verv small sample residue with only a trace of hydrocarbons and a
trace of ohthalate ester.
NR'?? not reported.
1-44
-------
TABLE 1-38
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE; S-2-5
Major Categories
Intensity
NR
NR
NR
Category
2-phenyl naphthalene
1,6 diphenylpenta-l-4-diene-3-one
2-phenyl naphthalene
MW Range
NR
NR
NR
Sub-Categories, Specific Compounds
Intensity
Category
m/e
Composition
Other
Comments; small sample residue with hydrocarbons, phtalates. and a series of
high molecular weight substituted aromatics.
NR = not reported.
1-45
-------
TABLE 1-39
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE; S-2-6
Major Categories
Intensity
NR
Category
1-octadecene
MW Range
NR
Sub-Categories. Specific Compoundi
Intensity
Category
m/a
Compoiition
•
•
•
Other
Comments: small sample residue with hydrocarbons, phthalates, and a trace of
high molecular weight aroma tics.
NR - not reported . , • _
-------
TABLE 1-40
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE; S-2-7
Major Categories
Intensity
NR
Category
1-octadecene
MW Ring*
NR
Sub-Catagori**, Specific Compounds
Intensity
Category
m/e
Composition
Other
Comments: small residue with hydrocarbons, ohthalates. and a trace of hiah
molecular weight aromatics.
NR = not reported.
1-4?
-------
The document includes:
1. Atomic Absorption Calibration Curves for the following elements:
Lithium
Silver
Chromium
Magnesium
Mercury
Zinc
Cadmiurn
Beryllium
Lead
Vanadium
Silicon
Strontium (range 0.0-1.0 ppm)
Strontium (range 0.0-10.0 ppm)
Copper
Nickel
Platinum
FTIR Spectral Scans for the following samples:
S-2-3
S-2-4
S-2-5
S-2-6
S-2-3 corrected for mineral
oil
ESCA Scans for the following samples:
S-2-5
S-2-6
S-2-4 corrected for mineral oil
S-2-5 corrected for mineral oil
S-2-6 corrected for mineral oil
S-2-7-2 corrected for mineral oil
S-2-7-3 corrected for mineral oil
S-2-7-2
S-2-7-3
SEM-EDX Scans for the following flyash samples:
S-2-3
S-2-4
S-2-5
S-2-6
S-2-7-2
-------
LEVEL 2
1-49
-------
Table 2-3. Sunroary of Required Level 2 Analysis
Assessment
of Mlvfd-
M1 FtC
Sasvlts
AsseSSMIIt
Of TOtll
Eirisslon
Data
(Table 1-2
r\ ..
FKStispit
$-2-3, Overflow
tod Material
>32SNnh
S-2-4 Btd
ffcterlal Ash -
aZSHtsh
S-2-5'Sludge
Staple
S-2-6, >27(i
Participate
S-2-7, < 27y
Paniculate
s-2-9. auc*
Gai Sample
(Ltvtl 2
sample net
available)
S-2-5,
S-2-6 and
S-2-7
ME6 Category *a*er tearing text! 2 Analyses by IX Fraction
IX
1
26
26
28
26
26
26
26
IX
2
2,16,21.22
21.22
2.16.21.22
2.16.21,22
2,16.21,22
2.16.21
2.15.16.22
IX
16,21.22
21.22
16.21.22
16.21.22
16,21.22
16,21
16.21.22
IX
4
17
25
IX
5
12.17
1C
6
8.10.13.19.23
10.23
10.23
10.19.23
10.13.19.23
10.13.23
1C
7
8.10.19.20
10.20
10.20
10.19.20
10.19.20
10,19.20
1C
•
8
8
8
Inorganics
U. M. K. >*}, Sr. Ba,
At. Ge. Sn. Pk. t. At. S.
St. T1. t, Cr, Ft. M.
M. *t. ta. ««. Cd. H(
ll. K. «». U. SI. Pb.
As. S. Ct, Cr. Ft. Mi,
Ct
LI. to. K. "9. Ca. ta.
Ci. T1, f. Cr. Ft. M.
IH. Cu. Cd. Hi
U. Ma. X. to. "J. Ca.
Sr. to. At, C. SI. Pb.
R. P. As. St. S. Cl. T1.
Zr. 1, Cr. ». Ft. Co. Bi.
IH, Pt. CM. *i. U. Hg
da. K. Ca. At. SI. P, As.
S. Tl. ». Cr. Ft. M. Hg
LI. Ha. I, to. Kg. Ca. Sr.
to. At. T1. SI. Pb, N. P.
As. T, T1, Zr, », Cr. fti.
Fe. Co. Ph. N1,
Cd. U, Til
Ltvtl 11
LtKtatt Studies
2. 8. 10. 13. 16. 19,
20. 21, 22. 23. 26,
LI. M. K. "1, Sr.
to. At. «t. St. Pb, P.
As. S. Ct. »r. F. 1,
St. Tf. V. Cr. Ft. m.
N«. ft. CM. Ag. Cd, Hg.
21. 22. 26. M. K.
Hg. Cr. SI. Pb. At. S,
Ct. Cr. Ft. Mi. Ca)
•level 2
Effort Required
-------
Table 3-1. Tabulation of Thermal Gravimetric Data
Sample Sample
Number Description
S-2-1 Illinois Coal No. 6
S-2-2 Grove Limestone
S-2-3 Overflow Bed
Material >325 Mesh
S-2-4 Overflow Bed
Material - 325 Mesh
S-2-5 Sludge
Temperature of
Activity (°C)
100
150
200
300
350
100
150
>200
100
150
200
300
350
400
100
150
200
300
350
400
100
150
2,00
300
350
400
Precentage Weight
Loss (% w/w)
4.0
7.0
9.0
9.0
Onset of Organic
Fraction Decomposition
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Onset of Organic
Fraction Decomposition
2.0
2.2
2.2
2.2
2.2
Onset of Organic
Fraction Decomposition
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
4.5
Onset of Organic
Fraction Decomposition
-------
Table 3-1. Tabulation of Thermal Gravimetric Data (Continued)
Sample
Number
Sample
Description
Temperature of
Activity (°C)
Precentage Weight
Loss (% w/w)
S-2-6
Particulates >27/*
100
150
200
300
350
400
0
0
0
0
0
Onset of Organic
Fraction Decomposition
S-2-7. Particulates < 27 n 100
150
200
300
350
400
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Onset of Organic
Fraction Decomposition
1-52
-------
Table 3-7. ICPOES Results on Leachate Samples
«-»-* «.„ 0.8 2.06 0.16 8.0. .... «.„. ,.„ 2.9 „.„. „.„. „.„ ^ „ „ ^
*M1C S~2~* °'"Z °'' °'M? "•'• "•"• "-°- "•"• °'M »•« «•« «•»- "-04 0.004 N.O. 0.2
UldHtts
S-2-3-A 0.80E 4.5 1.36 ..0. N.O. N.O. N.O. 7.14 20.3 N.O. N.O. 985.0 0.012 R.O. .0
«-«-A 0.197 12.3 ,.32 0.59 1.0 N.O. N.O. 15.1 15.76 N.D. N.O. 277.0 0.0,4 «... 0.3
$-2-1-8 58.3 2.2 0.72 0.10
Bute $-2-2-8 R.D. 4.0 O.OS N.O.
LMdMUS
S-2-3-B 8.0.
$-2-*-B 22.9
75.0 N.D. N.O. 0.94 1.90 N.D. N.D. C.86 0.019 0.012 N.D.
14.0 N.O. N.O. 0.26 6.49 N.O. N.O. 15.76 0.01 0.013 N.O.
2.7 «.D. N.D. 17.0 N.O. N.O. 0.21 10.5 N.D. N.D. 266.0 O.OK «... •...
9.9 4.28 0.803 125.0 N.O. N.O. 2.4 9.9 N.D. N.O. 34.0 0.002 N.D. N.O.
B. N.O.
I N.O.
I. N.O.
1 1.0.
1. N.O.
1. N.O.
I. N.D.
l. N.D.
1...
8...
N4>.
•.8.
0.12
0.11
I...
N.D.
O.OOJ
N.8.
8.0.
0.018
0.014
0.007
1.0.
N.O.
«...
N.D.
N.O.
N.O.
0.20
0.44
0.06
0.17
«...
N.O.
N.O.
N.D.
R.D.
N.D.
0.17
N.D.
8.8.
«...
R.D.
0.007
N.D.
0.016
R.O.
R.O.
N.D. Mot Detected
-------
Table 3-10. ESCA Results
Sample Elements
Code Sample Area Identified
S-2-5 Surface Fe2
°ls
Ca2p
Cls
Nals
S2P
S12s
Al2s
0
Interior 100A Fe~
°ls
Ca2P
Cls
Nals
S2P
S12s
Al2s
S-2-6 Surface Fe2
°ls
Ca2p
Cls
S2P
Si2s
Al,
Atom
Percent
3
64
4
-
0.2
1
18
10
3
54
0.6
-
0.03
-
21
18
2
62
4
-
2
22
8
Oxidation States
Derived
Fe3
O"2
Ca2
C
Na1
S6
Si2
Al3
Fe3
O"2
Ca2
C
Na1
S6
Si2
Al3
Fe3
O"2
Ca2
C
S6
Si2
Al3
1*51
-------
Table 3-10. ESCA Results (Continued)
Sample Elements
Code Sample Area Identified
S-2-7 Surface Fe2()
°ls
Ca2p
Cls
Nals
S2P
S12s
A12S
S-2-7 Interior 100A Fe2
°is
Ca2P
Cls
Nau
S2P
S12s
A12S
0
Interior 200A Fe2p
°ls
Ca2p
Cls
Nals
S2P
S12s
AU.
Atom
Percent
1
61
5
-
2
7
13
12
1
53
10
-
1
5
16
15
2
53
9
-
1
3
17
14
Oxidation States
Derived
Fe3
o-2
Ca2
C
N*1
S6
si2
Al3
Fe3
o-2
C.2
C
N.J
SOj, S" ratio 6:4
S12
Al3
Fe3
a'2
c.2
c
N,'
SOj, S" ratio 5.5:4.5
S12
Al3
1-56
-------
Table 3-11. XRD Results
Sample
Code
S-2-5
S-2-6
Determined
d-spacings
2.52
3.68
2.69
1.48
1.84
1.69
3.36
4.26
1.82
1.54
2.46
2.26
2.84
2.28
3.06
3.37
4.27
1.82
1.54
2.47
2.29
2.52
3.64
2.70
1.49
1.7C
2.85
2.30
3.04
2.85
2.09
1.61
2.41
1.74
2.70
Compound
Identified
Fe203
S102
CaS04
Si02
Fe2°3
CaS04
CaS
CaO
Literature
d-spacings
2.51
3.66
2.69
1.48
1.84
1.69
3.34
4.26
1.82
1.54
2.46
2.28
2.85
2.33
3.05
3.34
4.26
1.82
1.54
2.46
2.28
2.51
3.66
2.69
1.48
1.69
2.85
2.33
3.05
2.85
2.01
1.64
2.41
1.70
2.78
Relative
Intensity
Strong
Medium
Medium
Strong
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
1-56
-------
Table 3-11. XRD Results (Continued)
Sampl e
Code
S-2-7
Determined
d-spacings
3.34
4.26
1.82
2.46
2.28
2.84
3.67
2.69
1.69
2.84
2.03
1.64
2.51
3.67
2.69
1.69
Compound
Identified
S102
CaS04
CaS
Fe,0,
c 3
Literature
d-spacings
3.34
4.26
1.82
2.46
2.28
2.85
•3.66
2.69
1.69
2.85
2.01
1.64
2.51
3.66
2.69
1.69
Relative
Intensity
Strong
Strong
Medium
Low
Compounds, Elements and Ions Identified:
(u) , u.r) , Lt2 co3
(fie*) , BeO, BeO • A1203 • S102
(MgH . MgO, MgS04, MgC03, MgC03 • CaC03
©, (CaCO,) , (caSO. ) , MgCO, • CaCO-
V J V J
(Sr**) , SrS04
(§a) , BaC02 , BaSO.
© . (M^\ ' 3H20, A1203
Tl
1-57
-------
Table 3-12. EPMA Identified Elements
Sample Code
S-2-3
S-2-4
S-2-5
S-2-6
S-2-7
*
Major >10X
Medium 5-10%
Low 1-5X
Trace < 1%
Elements Detected
Calcium
Sulfur
Oxygen
Silicon
Iron
Potassium
Calcium
Sulfur
Oxygen
Silicon
Iron
Potassium
Chlorine
Magnesium
Aluminum
Calcium
Sulfur
Oxygen
Silicon
Iron
Potassium
Aluminum
Calcium
Sulfur
Oxygen
Silicon
Iron
Potassium
Calcium
Sulfur
Oxygen
Silicon
Iron
Potassium
Aluminum
Magnesium
Chlorine
Titanium
Relative Abundance*
Major
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Major
Medium
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
Trace
Trace
Trace
Major
Medium
Major
Major
Medium
Medium
Low
Medium
Medium
Medium
Major
Low
Medium
Major
Major
Major
Major
Medium
Medium
Low
Low
WV/Tff
Low
haw**
Low
— . — _ _
-------
Table 3-13. Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples
10
CATEOMY
27. LITHIUM
32. KKYLLIUN
33. MKKSIUH
CONWWD
11
llf (M 11)
H2COj fn 11)
UN
IMH ~
It
8(0 <» It)
Bra*1"*
feynl... M,
"90
*?2 {•» "i)
So7i« % '"'
<« "D *"*•
OolOBlU. HjCOv
CtCO] (« Ng)
C.F,
CiCOj ^^
MUTE
4IK
•a/in3 (pm)
'2,2 » 10
2.2 < 10
2.2 « to
2.2 * 10
2.5 « 10
S.3 « 10*
Z.O > 10)
N
N
8.19 I lo*
2.0
6.0 x 10]
6.01 « to3
1.01 « 10*
6.0 « 10)
6.0 « 10)
6.0 « 10)
6.0 > 103
6.0 « 10)
1.6 « 10*
N
N
N
N
mn
MCIU
NtJlTN
3.) • 10?
J.3 I 10?
3.3 I 102
1.3 « 10?
3.8 < 102
8.0 i 10*
3.0 i 10*
1.0 i 10*
1
1.12 i 10*
1.21 i M*
J.O i N
3.fl • 10
J.O i 10
».0 I 19*^
*.0 I 10*
t.S > 105
1.0 • 10*
9.0 i 10*
».0 i 10*
1.0 i M*
1.0 i 10*
1
I
I
MtTt
MATU
.0/1
ECOLOGY
3.8 i 10*
3.8 I 102
3.8 > 10?
3.8 « 102
II
*
*
2.3 . 10*
*
S.I > to
S.S > 10
55 i 10
8.7 > 10*
8.7 i 10*
1.0 i 10s
8.7 > 10*
8.7 I 10*
8.7 « 10*
8.7 i 10*
8.7 > 10*
1.6 I 10*
N
N
N
N
MITE
LMD
.9/1
HEALTH
7.0 » 10-'
1.6 I 103
6.0 i 10
N
3.64 » IQ)"
2.46 « 103
6.0 i 10"?
6.0 « 10-2
6.0 i 10"2
1.8 » 10?
1.8 i 10?
3.0 i 10?
1.8 i 10?
'1.8 • 10?
1.8 i 10?
1.8 > 10?
t.a i 10?
4.8 I 10?
II
II
I
N
MATE
UNO
.9/9
ECOLOGY
7.5 . 10-'
N
N
4.6 « 10
N
N
1.1 > 10-1
1.1 « 10-1
1.1 > 10-'
| 1.7 i 10?
j 1.7 > 10? 1
2.0 I 10?
1.7 « 102
1.7 > 1Q2
1.7 i 10?
1.7 » 102
1.7 > 10?
3.2 « 10
N
I
N
N
SAW/
5.4.I05
N.O.
N.D.
N.O.
.34«IO'
3.7nlQ3
N.D.
N.D.
N.O.
N.D.
N.D.
Promt
'rvsent
N.O.
KATId
frtseit 1
rnnt t
tutd on
bin) on
UYU 1
•tguittD
T-TtJ
KCttft Ml
Sec tot* 1
fe«* on Coi
n*» M CM
•iipj.ij Dt
imuaiil D»
TEST
t
u - s« »
WMNl Ojtl
POWNl OjtJ
tl
u
TEST
EXPEC-,
9t« 1
TEST
COST)
T/WLC KEY:
. TtSt HETHOO
I. STMIDMtO
2. oentop-
MCNTAL
3. UNKNOWN
A. MS
8. HDD
C. MU
CHIHICM
0. ESC*
E. 6C/M5
. EXPECTED TEST
SUCCESS:
I. HIGH
2. HOW RATE
3. UNKNOWN
. TEST COST
I. REASONABLE
2. MOOfMIE
3. HIGH
SAMPLE A1IQUOT
I. ADEQUATE
2. MUKIMl
3. INADEQUATE
4. RESAHPU
•tlon of S-2-5, S-2-6 and S-2-7
I. Bl»d on Lcral 2 InctaU >tvo> of
N.O. Not Detccttd
5-2-6.
-------
Table 3-13. Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples (Continued)
CA1UHR
». STMIIM
M. IMIM
17. VMM
'
38. ALMIMM
M. GALLIUM
COMPOUND
StrwttM
Stranllio Ion.
Sr*» (« Sr)
Stmttia Ftmrldt.
Srfj (M Sr)
Strantlw SnUtU.
SrfO, (tt Sr)
ItrlM. tt
Itrlui Ion, It**
(wb)
tarlui Svl'l*,
ItS (if tt)
ItrlM TMo-
ctrbOMU, ItCSi
(tt It)
tori* Mwrldt.
ltF2 (ts It)
Itrlni Ctrtonttt,
ItCOj (tt It)
Itrlw SulftU.
MSQt (H It)
loron, 1
tartu. M) (tt 1)
NtUtorttt. IPJ-
(« t) '
lorw (hid*. l2«)
Aliafnui. Al
AlMlou* Ion,
A1«+«
StiulU, AljOj-
SljO (ti Al)
MytfrtUil AlutlM
StllctU (it Al)
AlMt [N Al I01
1.1 » 10*
S.O > 102
S.O « I0>
S.O > 10*
S.O « 10*
S.O i 10*
S.O « 10*
S.O « 10*
1.1 i I01
1.1 « I01
1.1 < 1C3
i.o > 10*
&.2 I IflJ
S.Z > I03
S.? i I01
S.Z > 1(P
S.2 > 103
l.» < ID4
S.O i IOJ
S.O < I0}
5.0 » I03
Mil
*m
NCA11N
4.t I 19*
4.i « I04
4.* i 10*
4.f I 10*
S.O > to)
S.O « to*
S.O • I0l
S.O • 10)
S.O > I03
S.O « 1(P
S.O i 10^
4.7 > 10^
4.7 , 10*
4.) • 10*
l.S • 10*
a.o « 10*
« 0 i 10*
a.o « lo4
a.o M to4
a.o > iff*
l.S « 10s
74 I I0«
7.4 I I04
?,4 i II)4
HATE
MTU
»«/1
CCO.OCY
N
N
II
N
2.S > 10)
t.S • 101
l.S • I0l
;.s i io]
2.S i 10J
l.S > I01
2.5 • 101
2.S « 10*
2.S > I04
2.S « I04
N
1.0 i 10)
1.0 > !0}
1.0 > I01
1.0 > 10)
i.o > to3
N
N
N
N
HATE
LAM
>4/9
ICALTH
t.t > 10
i.i « 10
t.t < 10
1.2 > 10
1.0 > 10
1.0 i 10
1.0 I 10
1.0 « 10
1.0 * 10
1.0 « 10
1.0 « 10
9.3 « 10
f.l > 10
9.1 t 10
1.0 i 10*
1.6 • 102
l.S > 10*
1.6 « 10*
1.6 i 10*
1.6 i 10*
3.0 » I02
1.5 » 10*
l.S > 10*
1.5 « 10*
nut
LAM
ECOLOtl
1
1
*
•
S.O
S.O
s.-o
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O i 10
S.O > 10
s.o i 10
•
2.01
1
2.0
2.0
2.0
*
M
II
II
itf
IPI»)
M/t
I.4.104
N.O.
frtu*t
M.O.
».».
S.ZxlO*
Pre«nl
U.K.
Ml 10
yyru
Twr
hud OB
Itsed ori i
ICKl 2
•EOHICO
f-US
I-M
iutott Nil
Mm*4 Bt
Iu.tt4i Mt
^•PCMM Oi
TtST
KTHOO1
I
It
.« - SM Nc
.j
Test
EIWC-,
TATtONS*
t* 1
TEST
COST)
SAMPLE.
ALIQUOT4
TAtU U«:
1. TEST METHOD
I. STAMARO
2. DEVELOP-
•CMAL
1.
A. MU
I. MO
C. MET
CHEMCAL
0. ESU
E. GC/W
2. EIPECTEO TEST
SUCCESS:
I. HICK
2. MDOEMTE
1. URMOM
1. TEST COST
I. SEASONABLE
2. ttWCIMTE
1. MICH
4. SAMPLE ALIQUOT
I. ADEQUATE
2. HAR6IMU.
J. INADEQUATE
4. RESAXPIE
i of i-z-b. i-i-t jrwj s-2-;. N.D.
• N.R.
I. Bdsed on level ? Udchdte tludy of sample
Not GKlecttd
Not Htqulre'l
-------
Table 3-13. Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples (Continued)
CATECOftt
40. IMMIM
41. THALLIUM
42. CMBOH
43. SIIICOH
44. etRMMIUH
RMroum
GtlllC. G»»*
<« C.J
Ulllvi Setqul-
Ol I*. G*70]
(Mb) 3
litftM. In
Mini Ion. liTJ
Thill lap. Tl
Tkillcin, Tl'*
Tlttlllc, Tl*l
Elnnltl Urbon
Coal
Cart lite, C-
CirtaMt*. 0)3"*
Rtcartxmate. HC03
Uftenyl, CO-
Carton Monoilde
Carton Dloilfe
StlMM. SIK4
Silicon. SI
OrthMlHcate.
sio«-<
Ifctaslllcate,
SIOs'*
Silicon D<(»ia>.
SIOj
Silicon DtsulMde,
SISZ
Silicon Carbide, S1C
GenHitlui, Ge
Cemnotn, 6e»*
{•» 6«)
Gerwnlc. Ce4<
(•> 6»)
lenmwii Sul(ld«,
CcS (JS Ge)
Semunlc Sulftce,
GfSj {« Gf)
Genaw, GeH4
(«ld«.
6tO? (»s Ge)
mn
«i»
*H I01
5.0 i I03
1. > 10*
1. .102
1. .ID?
1. I 10?
1. . 10?
3. > 103
N
II
II
II
1
4.0 I lO'jB)
9.0 i 10* (5000)
7.0 . to*
1.0 i 10*
II
M
1.0 l 10*
II
1.0 « lO4
5.6 i 10*
5.6 > 10*
S.« i 19*
5.6 i ID*
5.6 « 102
5.S i 10*
5.6 i 10*
MTE
MTIM
KMW
7.4 i Id4
7.4 » 10*
1. « 10*
1. • 103
1. ii 10*
1. I IOJ
1. i 103
i.3 « 104
II
•
M
II
H
(.0 > I05
H
1.1 x I04
I.S i 10s
1
ft
1.5 . 10s
M
I.S II 10s
*.4 < I0}
R.4 I 10*
8.4 « ID*
8.4 > I0}
8.4 > 103
8.4 . I03
8.4 . I03
mit
IMTCII
.9/1
ECO.OGT
N
N
II
H
N
N
tt
M
II
II
II
II
N
6.0 . 10
N
II
II
II
N
II
II
II
N
II
*
K
N
N
II
WTt
UWD •
HMLTH
I.S > 10*
I.S s ID2
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
I.C * 10*
1
II
•
•
•
IV*
«M
• •
3.0 . 10*
N
N
3.0 > I02
*
3.0 > 10*
i.r . 10
1.7 x 10
1.7 • 10
1.7 » 10
1.7 > ia
1.7 I 10
1.7 > 10
mit
LAW
ECOLOGT
M
N
I
II
II
II
II
II
N
N
II
N
II
•V*
H/A
?.l i 10
N
K
N
II
N
N
M
N
II
II
N
N
R
t2f
14/1
H.B,
H.R.
H.O.
Pmtnt
».I.
t.3ilo'
Pr«j«nt 1
».«.
MTIO
SMtC
iinrr
l«Ud M> C
IM4 OH (
itm 2
WOUHEO
T-rts
••HO
tmmvui Hi
EJCM« Ma
••pound 0« 1
TEST .
WTHOD1
<
t
l
TEST
tmc-
TATIOB*
nst
COST'
AuqwT4
TABLE H»:
TEST METHOO
I. STAWAM)
z. ocmor-
KITTAl
3.
A. MS
1. XKD
C. MET
CHEHICM.
o. ESCA
E. GC/K
EWECTED TEST
SUCCESS:
I. HIGH
t. WttWfE
3.
TEST COST
I. KEASOMVLC
7. HOKMTI
3. HICM
SAWtE
ALigun
1. ADEQUATE
t. HUKIMU.
3. IHMtqOHTf
4. KSMVIE
•Swntlon of 5-2-5. 5-2-6 and S-?-7.
I. Based on Level I leacliate study of sample S-?-«.
H.D. Not Detected
U.K. Mot Required on Level 2
-------
Table 3-13. Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples (Continued)
anon
45. IH
4C. IEA»
47. unman
1
COMKIM
Tin fetdt. S»02
Tin, S«
Stunan. S»f2
SlMlc, $•>«*
U*tf, 1%
ClMMUl l«4d,»
Mwfewt. f*«*
piwbic. HI**
<«n>)
Lnd fenoilde,
rto (•> »)
LMd Sulfitt,
mo* <« n>»
LMtf S»lflU,
«x (» t»j
Lead UrtratuU,
fbCOj (ts ft)
Le>d Ptetptate,
»J<»04)i <» n>)
Lead ChroHU.
rtCrt)4 (at n>)
Lead MllyMaU,
rWto04 (<> (t>)
lead Ancnatt.
•MIAsOa, Us ft)
. Hydraifne
Alkali Cyanldei.
NaCN. K»
MMc Act** MHO]
nitrogen Oxides,
go. Kg, KjO,.
"ZOj. «Z<>5
Kydroten Cy3-
Kltrlte. «or
tannlwi. NH4f
mif
Ml
<4/^(W»
1.0 • 10*
I
1
•
I.S « MZ
l.i « H*
l.f • l«2
I.S • V?
I.S > 1A2
I.S i 10*
I.S • 10*
I.S « 10*
I.S i 10*
I.S • ID2
I.S i ID2
i.s . to?
I.S i 10* (.1)
4.0 i Id'
S.O I 10*
9.0 i 103
I.I l 10* (10)
1.8 > 10* (ZS)
2.0 > 1C*
N
N
II
»
mif
MTU
NCM.TH
I.S > ID*
II
M
1
I.S > 102
I.S « 10*
I.S « 10*
Z.S I 10*
2.5 > ID2
Z.S « I02
2.S « ID2
Z.S i 10*
2.S i 10*
Z.5 i 10*
J.S . 10*
z.s i 10*
2.)
S.O > 10*
7.S • Id4
1.4 « 10*
S.O I ID2
2.5 i 103
1.0 > 10)
N
N
N
II
mit
WTU
««/i
ECOUKT
I
•
*
II
S.O l 10
S.O > 10
S.O i 10
S.O < 10
S.O i 10
S.O i 10
S.O > 10
S.O • 10
S.O i 10
S.O • 10
SO • 10
S.O i 10
K
2.S i 10
4.S 1 10*
N
2.S < 10
5.0 i 10
2.S > 10
M
II
II
II
NATE
UNO
»i/1
KM.TH
1.0
N
«
II
S.O I 10-'
S.O 11 10-1
S.O x 10-'
S.O 1 10-1
S.O > 10-1
S.O < ID'1
S.O > 10-1
S.O x 10-'
S.O i 10''
S.O • 10-'
SJ> i ID-'
S.O > 10-'
4.5
1.0
I.S i 10'
«/A
1.0
5.0
2.0
N
N
N
N
WT(
1MB
rt/i
ECOtOEf
1
1
«
K
i.o i ia-1
i.o • IB-'
1.0 » W1
1.0 l 10-'
t.o » io-«
i.o i io- ;
1.0 l 10-'
i.o • 10-1
I.O i 10-1
1.0 • 10-'
1.0 < 10-'
1,0 « 10-'
II
S.O i 10-*
».o i ir»
•/»
5.0 i MT*
I.O < ID'1
5.0 i 10-2
II
N
«
N
t5"'
(w-J
H/l
•.1.
l.taUH
•.0.
*.».
*.*.
1.0.
Front
«.».
Prtuat
«.o.
I.O.
I.O.
1.0.
• 1.
»D.
HO.
» L)
MTIO
^
Uu4 on
U**4 on
fttiird on
B«std on
&4sed or
LEVEL 2
ttqUIRED
T-U5
•*«
(jceedt Ib
Mpound tV
Mpouid a
Co^ound 0
Canpound 0
Co«4)ound EX
1 1
TEST .
KTHOO1
u
u
u
ilJ
ill
111
TEST
EWEC-
TATIOW2
.
TEST
COST3
SAHPLE.
AllQUOT4
TMIE UV:
TEST MTHOD
I. STANOAM)
2. MVELOP-
KMTAL
1. UNKNOWN
*. AA5
t. xM
c. urr
CHCNICAL
». (KA
E. K/HS
EIKCTCD TEST
SKXESS
1. Ml 04
I. HXCRATE
1. (MUMM
. TEST COST
I. KASOMM.E
I. MKMTC
I. HIGH
'JUH.E ALIQUOT
I. ADCOIMTE
i mneiN/u.
1. IMOCQUATE
4. BESAMPLE
dtloo of S-?-5. 5-Z-6 and 5-3-6.
N,i) Hot UetettcJ
N.R Not Required cin level
Bastd on Level 2 leachate study ol
-------
Table 3-13. Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples (continued)
CAiEGORr
4B. PHOSPHORUS
49. ARSENIC
50. ANTIMONY
SI. BISMUTH
COJPOMI
ttm&arrt. r
PtotpMte. POj-'
(« >•)
ilpfenplutt.
HZ^- trTP)
Ptotpfcfee, PHJ
PhMftorlc AcU.
HjP04
Penuiiitri*
Plnsptate. PQ«-J
Artenfc. At
Metallic Annie
ArteMwt. Ai»3
Annie, At'S
Aruiutc. AtOf1
(« At)
Anenlte. AsOj-J
(is Ml
Arsenide, »j-J
(il At)
Art Inc. »sHj
Arsenic Trtoilde,
»*203
Antlnny Irl-
«*<*. 56,0,
Ant Imp Mrt.l, Sb
AnttKNUM.
(ittbnonj Sfc'J
An}£mlc (tttknte)
Stlblne. SMH
(a» St>)
Antlaonon 5*1-
ft*. Sb,5,
Antlmy. Sk
Biswth. B1
ElnrnUl »t»-
•uth. Si
Blsnuthom. il'1
(« BO
Blswthlc, ll'%
(« BO
mit
MR
m/^ (PP-I
1.0 i 10*
1.0 i 10*
1.0 i 10*
4.0 < 10? (0.1)
1.0 < 103
1.0 i IIP
N
2.0 i 10
2.0 i 10
2.0 t 10
2.0 i 10
2.0 i 10
?.0 >! 10
2.0 i 10
2.0 i 10
2.0 i 10
5.0 i I01
5.0 > 10*
5.0 « 10*
5.0 i I02
50 • 10?
S.O l I02
5.0 . 10?
4.1 i 10?
4.1 , IP2
4.1 i 10?
4.1 » 10?
mrt
(MTU
•Mm
1.5 > !••
1.5 i 10*
1.1 • 10*
(.0 I ID*
1.5 « 10*
l.S • 10*
•
2.5 i 10?
2.5 i 10*
7.5 i 10?
2.5 > 10?
2.5 i 10?
2.5 i 10?
2.5 i to?
2.5 « 10?
2.5 i 10?
7.5 i 10?
7.S • 10*
7.5 > 10*
7.5 1 1t>J
7.5 • ICP
7.5 ) IflJ
7.5 I HP
6.1 i IQ)
6.1 i tO3
6.1 i 103
6.1 i 10>
MTE
MATCH
»«/t
ECOLOGY
5.0 > 10-1
'vo.« 10-'
5.0 > 10-'
N
'4.5 i 103
N
•
S.O > 10"
S.O « 10*
S.O i 10'
S.O « 10'
S.O i 10'
S.O i 10'
s.o « 10'
S.O « 10'
5.0 il to'
2.0 i 10?
(» Sb)
2.0 > 10?
2.0 « 10?
2.0 i 10?
2.0 > 10?
2.0 i 10?
2.0 k 10?
N
N
N
II
mtc
LAW
•V}
HfAUN
1.0 i 10
3.0 i 10
3.0 I 10
VA
3.0 « 10
3.0 > 10
N
S.O « 10-'
5.0 > 10-'
S.O « 10-'
5.0 K 10-'
5.0 « 10-'
5.0 x 10-'
5.0 > 10-"'
5.0 » 10-'
5.0 > 10-'
1.5. i 10
1.5 « I01
1,5 i 101
l.S > 101
1.5 K I01
l.S > 10'
l.S > 10*
1.2 « 10'
1 .2 > tO1
1.2 « 10*
1.2 « 10'
IWH
LAW
.9/9
CCOLOGT
1.0 i 10-1
t.O • 10-3
>.0 i 10-1
N/A
9.0
N
*
1.0 » 10-'
1.0 Ji 10-'
1.0 » 10-'
1.0 i 10-'
1.0 I 10-'
1.0 » 10-1
1.0 » 10-'
1.0 « 10-'
1.0 > 10-'
4.0 « 10-'
(«»)
4.0 I 10-'
4.0 » 10-'
4.0 < 19-'
4.0 i 10-'
4.0 > 10-'
4.0 » 10-'
II
N
R
II
ig/iy
IPH«)
•9/1
1.0,
N.D.
N.O.
5.0 « 1
5.0 * 1
5.0. 1
Present
Present
Cr«e«t
N.R.
N.R.
Ml 10
SApyyt
mu
o-«
o-'
o-l
t«se4 on
B«»td on
Based on
irm 2
KQJIIIKD
i-ns
M-IB
CwvwtflD
U«*«.»
(npowirf 0
HST
KWOO'
See Rote
See Note
See Rote
Se
*
V
u
u
u
TCST
E«KC-
TA1IORS?
i Note 1
f Note 1
f Note 1
mi
COST1
SAWIE
AllQUOT*
TABLE KEt:
TEST «THOO
1. 5TAHOARO
2. DEVCIOP-
KNTAl
3. UNKNOWN
A. AAS
B. IRD
C. WET
CHEMICAL
D. tSCA
t. CS/Hi
EXPECTED TEST
SUCCESS:
1. HIGH
2. mOEMTE
3. UNKHOUN
TtST COST
1. REASONABLE
2. MODERATE
3. HIGH
SAMPLE ALIQUOT
1. AKQIMTF
2. rKRGIWM
3. INADEQLMIE
4. RE SAMPLE
of 5-2-5, S-?-6 «nd S-2-?.
I. Based on level 2 leaclute study of sample 5-2-6.
N.D. Not Detected.
N.R. Not Required on Level
-------
Table 3-13. Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples (Continued)
CHUOH
a. Dma
»). SWfl*
S4. SCIIMW
55. TEUU1IUH
56. FLUORIC*
COMPOMO
MOM. Oj
•otic Sutrw. Sg
S»1fl*. $•*
falfeU. SOV*
S.HIU, »r*
TktoqriMU. SOT
S*Hnc TrlMl*.
»1
Svlfmrlc Acid.
•*04 .
Sulfur Olonltfts.
S02
Nyfrogm Svlftdt.
MjS
Urban Dtlulfl*.
at
Urfconyl Sulftd*.
COS
Selmlvn. S*
ElamUt S*l«of«.
S*
S»l*nldt, St-2
S*lMlt*i. SeOj-*
f« S.) *
SileMtts. StOV2
(« S.)
H/aVogtfl Selentdt,
HZ*
Cjrfeon OUtltnldt,
CS«2 (•< S.)
SelcnlM Dloild*.
SKI? (is Sel
Tcllurtui. Tc
Ullurldt. U-?
Ttllurlti. TeO}-?
(«1 T.)
T*llur«te, TeOi
(u Te)
Fluoride Ion, F~
Hydrogen Fli»r1a>,
llf
mn
4">
,«/J (M.)
t.O • H>» (O.I)
1
II
1
•
1
«
1.0 > I0>
1.1 l 10*
I.S i 10* (10)
t.O « 10* (20)
4.4 > 10*
2.0 < ID2
2.0 > 10*
2.0 • Itr*
2.0 > I02
2.0 l 10*
2.0 « 10* (.OS)
2.0 > ID7
2.0 < I02
1.0 > I02
1.0 « I02
1.0 i ID2
1.0 < 1C2
2.5 » ID3
2.0 i I03
mn
una
01/1
WJE.1H
«/*
i
•
i
•
•
N .
I.S i ID*
2.0 < 10s
2.3 > 10*
f.O I 10s
KM
S.O » 10*
S.O i 10'
S.B » I0>
S.O i 10'
S.O » 10*
S.O i 101
(M S*l
5.9 > 10'
S.O « 1C1
I.S t I03
I.S i )0>
I.S > 10]
I.S > I01
J.8 i ID4
3.0 « Id4
mn
IKTEI
»*n
Eoucr
•/A
•
•
•
•
•
•
4 S i 10>
•
1.0 • I0>
1.0 i 10*
V*
2.S < I0>
2.S i 10*
2.S « I01
2.S « IQl
2.S « I01
2.S • I01
(u S*)
2.S i 1C1
2.S « ID1
II
M
•
N
II
H
mic
LAND
A
«/»
H
1.0 > I0<
4.0 x 102
«/A
WA
K/A
1.0 a 10-1
1,0 « 10-'
1.0 « 10"'
1.0 « 10-'
1.0 » 10-'
1.0 « 10-1
(it Sc)
1.0 » 10-'
1.0 i 10"'
1.0 < 10
1.0 x 10
3.0 « 10
3.0 x 10
7.5 x 101
N/A
NATE
LAM)
ECOtoJl
I/A
II
9.0 > 10*
II
H/A
VA
VA
S.O » IO-2
S.O > 10-*
S.O « IIT*
S.O > IO-2
5.0 i to*2
S.O * )0-?
<<1 St)
5.0 i 10-2
5.0 « lO"2
N
II
N
N
N
H/
VWffU
'¥
•«/!
«.«.
rmmt
Pr««t
».«.
U.K.
H.R.
MHO
»Sr
a
C. WET.
' CHEMICAL
D. £5CA
E. GS/NS
2. CXPECTID TEST
success
I. HIGH
2. MODERATE
l. UManw
1. TEST COST
I. KASONMLE
2. MODERATE
3. HIGH
4. SAMPLE ALIQUOT
1. ADEQUATE
2. MARGINAL
3. INADCqUATf
4. RESAMPLt
ot S-?-S. 5-2-6 ind S-2-7.
1. Baitd on Le»el 2 Itdthjlt iludy of san,ple S-2-6.
1.0. Not Detected.
N R Not Required
-------
Table 3-13. Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples (Continued)
in
cATEtoRr
57. CHLORINE
SB. MONIIK
5». loom
CO. SCMOIUM
6i. TTTIIUN
62. TITMIUH
63. ZIRCOHIWI
M. HAFNIUM
65. (MHOIUN
COMPOUND
Chloride Ion, Cl"
NnocMorlU,
do-
Chlorite. ClOj*
CMortt*. 003
Chlorine Ho»l4e.
cio.
Urbon/1 Chloride
(DhOMHie).
COCI;
Hydrogen Chloride.
MCI
Irani* to*. Ir*
•mride 1 Mi, li-
Hgrrfrogen Brandt.
HRr
10414* Ion, 1-
Scmdli*. Sc
Sundlw loo. Vc«3
Yttriun Ion, T*3
TIUnluB, II
TltwKXH. 11*3
(•» Tl)
TIUBle. T|H
(«»TI)
TltMluo Dioxide.
TIO? (» ID
Zlrconti* Ion.
Zr*4
Zlrconlin Dloiide.
ZrOj (« Zr)
HtfnluB Ion. Mf<
Vliwdlw, »
ElmmUl
\rtnK))i», V
Timdlc, »*3 (>s «)
»«n«(yl, to*'
(« V)
Ortho»tn«d«t«.
HOT* («» »)
MTC
*9/*3'(PH>)
•
•
II
*
H
4.0 I 10?
7.0 I 10*
II
II
1.0 i to*
•
S.J i 10*
S.3 i 10*
1.0 . 103
6.0 i Id3
6.0 > 103
6.0 x 103
6.0 x I(P
S.O i 103
S.O I 103
S.O i 10?
S.O I 10?
S.O « 10?
S.O i 10?
S.O » 10*
5.0 i 10?
mn
MM«
NCM.TM
h3 « 1#
•
i
•
•
6.0 i 103
1.1 i IB*
•
II
l.S > 10s
*
•.0 i IV
8.0 « W
l.S « W*
9.0 . 19*
».0 i 10*
9.0 i 10*
9.0 i 10*
7.S « 1«*
7.S i 10*
r.s » i*4
2.S » I*3
J.5 I 10>
?.S i 1»J
2.5 i 10J
l.S > 193
mn
MTU
•»"
tcaosr
i
it
ii
•
i
*
• i
•
N
M
II
II
«
»
t.2 i 10?
(«
T«[S04h)
S.Z « 10?
S.Z • 10?
» ? • 10?
II
n
II
l.S i 10?
1.5 I 10?
t.S i 10?
t.S i 10?
l.S i 10?
MTE
LAW
M/l
HEALTH
2.6 * I0]
N
N
II
N
VH
• KM
II
II
II/A
N
1.6 « 19-?
1.6 * 10"?
3.0 x I0>
1.8 > 10?
1.8 » 10?
1.8 > 10?
1.8 « 10?
1.5 > 10*
l.S > 10'
l.S « 10
S.O « 10
S.O I 10
S.O > 10
S.O « 10
S.O > 10
mrt
LMO
EGOUKT
N
II
II
II
•
VA
•/A
N
K
H/A
II
•
*
II
1.6 i 10
1.6 > 10
1.6 I 111
1.6 > 10
II
I
II
3.0 > 10-'
3.0 i 10-'
3.0 » 10-'
3.0 » 10-'
3.0 » 10-'
yf
<**•>
M/l
N.R.
U.S.
ft.*.
•.ft.
«.*.
H.O.
e.oxio
R.t.
2.6«10J
Present
RATIO
W
Dan *>
Exceeds
Btied on
um 2
nquiHO
T-TES
»«0
ticeed •»
•tat«
toopovnd 0)
!
TEST
term'
*
u
TEST
EWEC-.
TAT10HS?
TEST-
COST3
SAWIE.
AliquOT4
TABLE KET:
TEST MtTHOO
1. STANDARD
2. omiop-
WNTAL
3. UNKNOWN
A. AAS
B. XM>
C. MET
CHEMICAL
D. ESCA
E. 6C/I6
tWCCTED TEST
SUCCESS:
I. HICN
2. HOCCMTE
3. UM9KMI
TEST COST
1. REASONAKE
2. MODERATE
3. HIGH
SAMPLE Aliquot
I. AOEQUAIE
2. MARGINAL
3. INADEqUATf
4. RESANPlt
• SvMtlon of
1. Sased on Le»e
S-2-5. S-2-6 >nd $-2-7.
t 1«ch«te study of S-2-6.
0.0. Not Detected.
N.R. Not Required on Level :.
-------
Table 3-13. Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples (Continued)
ot
Ot
aaum
M. MBMi
a. UKAUH
M. OMMM
OMB
wr**-"*"
ST--"
•Tffw*^**'
fciillm IrtMldt.
**)(«l)
•««•. ti*,. (« f )
•I*. «A (M *)
VBMNMI CtffeMt
K(«I|
•*««*. n I«s «)
VHttVMM MtoTMiVt
• C»t|
feM+l MM*.
•5*-S*« (M t)
M*«.»>1
M io»
S.O x 10*
t.t x 1C4
t.t t M*
M x 10*
».0 x I(P
1.0 I 10
I.O x M
1.0 i 1.0
I.O x 10
1.0 I 10
I.O i 10
I.O x 10
I.O i 10
I.O x 10
I.O i 10
mn
ma
tStn
I.S x 10*
Z.i x IOJ
t.t i W>
Z.» x I01
M i IOJ
l.S I W>
2.S • 10*
I.S I I01
t.t I 10)
t.i x 103
3.1 x 10*
l.J x 10s
I.J x 10*
l.i x W
2.S I 10*
2.S x 10*
2.S x 10*
l.i i 10*
2.1 X 10*
2.S x 10*
I.S x 10*
Z.S i 10*
2.S x 10*
2.S x 10*
IMC
wra
ECttOCT
l.» x 10*
I.I x 10*
I.S x 10*
I.S x 10*
I.S i 10*
I.S x 10*
I.S x 10*
I.S x 10*
I.S X 10*
I.S i 10*
1
1
•
1
I.S i 10*
I.S i 10*
I.S « 10*
I.S x 10*
I.S i 10*
I.S I ID2
I.S • 10*
2.S i 10*
I.S i 10?
2.S i 10*
MIC
H/t
M&1H
S.O x M
S.O » 10
S.O x 10
S.O X 10
S.O i 10
S.O x 10
S.O i 10
S.O x U
S.O I 10
S.O i M
«.S i 10*
«.S I 10*
t.S x 10*
I.S x 10*
S.O I 10-*
S.O I 10-1
S.O x 10°
S.O x 10"'
S.O I 10-1
S.O I 10-1
S.O i W1
S.O i lO'1
S.O I ID"1
5.0 « 10-'
mn
1MB
M/l
ccaum
J.O x 10-1
1.0 x 10-1
1.0 x 10-1
1.0 I 10-1
1.0 x 10-1
1.0 I 10-1
1.0 I 10-1
i.o i icri
1.0 1 10-1
3.0 X 10-1
II
I
II
i
S.O I 10-*
S.O x 10-1
S.O I lO'l
s.o i icr1
S.O i 10-1
S.O i 10-1
S.O i 10-1
s.o i 10-1
S.O > Id'1
s.o i 10-1
SDf
w
Fraxtt
fmwt
PratMt
fn*t*t
».«.
X.K.
I.MilO3
j.nio
1.9x10
htunt
PrtlMt
Frttcnt
Present
MIM
w
Inr* at
JMK w
ItMrtM
ttt*4 m
licirti I
Cxc^
f»UI«l
tutrf •»
l*tatm
bud M
... _^
Baud on
IEHI 2
KquiKD
Y'TCS
••»
bapowid 1
£••••^•4 D
fx^niiml 0
^•MOIflM 0
ht*
hu - SM
KU - SM
Coxy»«ml 1
C^MriC
Coapound
Co^ound
TCSI
KIHOQl
lU
U
U
U
tote 1
toti 1
IU
IU
lit
tau
TEST
E1KC-
TATIONSZ
rar
OHT3
s/wir
ALIQUOT4
TABU OT
TEST MCTMOD
1. STAMMB
2. KVElff-
Kirr/u.
3. umooM
A. AAS
B. XRO
C. MET
OKMICA1
0. ESCA
E. 6C/I6
EinCTED TCSI
SUCCESS:
I. HICH
2. NDOEMK
1.
IEST COST
I. IEASOW&E
2. NDOttAU
1. HICK
SWTI.E ALI««T
I.
3. HMMQIMTl
4.
al«o> »f S-I-S. S-I-* Md S-2-7.
1
I. tttcd M lew) 2 leMhilc itudy of S-7-6.
H.O. Not teucted.
N.R. Not R**jirid on Level 2.
-------
Table 3-13. Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples (Continued)
UTtOBT
M. IVLTMta
70. TW6STEI
71. MMGNCa
72. im
CONFOUND
•ytfrwi ChroiliM
ItaMtatc. CifDi
»J« (« Cr)
Iran Oifwte,
FetrO, (« Cr)
WljMRMlB, Hi
MyMnmn. N»»?
UriyMfc, Ho*)
•jlyM»U. MM-?
in*)
NtljMomi SHI ride.
MS2 (« tt>)
MyMrm TMoxtde.
«W3 (K No)
*••«*•. M
tartan !<*». *«*..,
•MTll»S, W*. I**'?
Tviyit** DtsnlMde.
«S| (a »)
tot frail te'mneril.
MB|.MM>| (« H)
NMgMme. Mi
ftM»MMn. Mi»?
HMtwIc. Mi*'
Ptm*gmte. Mi04'
(«» HO
NX»H«OIII Oxide.
IM (n Hi)
HM«MM Dioxide.
N»OZ (« in)
RMfMese Carbonate,
NcCOj <« Mi)
H»ii«iium Sulfite,
NXS04 (« Ml)
NMfMese SuUtde.
IM2 (it Hi)
In* Cartmivls,
ffl;/Jcoi'-
Ferraw. F»»S
Ferric, F«*3
r«rron Oxide. FtO
mre
^/o3(pf«i)
1.0 « 10
1.0 I 10
S.O i IflJ
S.O i 103
S.O M 10*
S.O i I03
S.O > 1(>3
S.O i 103
1.0 K 10>
i
1.0 i 10)
1.0 * ID3
5.0 • I03
s.o « 10)
S.O « 103
s.o > to)
S.O ii 103
5.0 I 103
S.O « 103
5.0 i 10)
s.o « 10)
7.0 i 10?
1.0 I 10)
1.0 « 10)
S.O « 10)
MTT
M1U
HEALTH
? S i 10*
?.& I 10*
7.S i Iff*
7.S s Iff"
7.S « 10*
7.S > I04
7.S i 10*
7.S x 10*
I.S x 10*
H
1.5 > 10*
1.5 I 104
?.S I I02
Z.5 x U>2
Z.S ,102
?.S x 10^
e.s > 10?
2.5 x 10*
2.5 x 10*
2.5 • 10?
2.5 K 10*
1.1 x 10*
1.5 x ID3
I.S x 10)
7.5 x 10«
Mlt
MATH
ECO.OCT
2.S I 10*
2.5 I 10?
7.0 i 10)
7.0 I I0>
7.0 I 10)
7.0 i 10)
7.0 i 10)
7.0 « lO1
I
•
I
1
1.0 i 10?
1.0 i 10?
1.0 I 10?
1.0 i 10?
1.0 i 10?
1.0 I 10?
1.0 • M?
1.0 i 10?
1,0 i 10?
i
2.S i 10?
2.S i 10?
•
mn
LWP-
M/I
wtt.ni
s.o x 10-'
S.O x 10-'
1.5 i 10?
I.S x 10?
I.S i 10*
I.S I 10?
1.5 i 10?
1.5 « 10?
3.0 i 10)
•
1.0 i 101
3.0 x 101
5.0 x 10-'
S.O i 10-'
5.0 x IO"1
S.O x 10-'
5.0 i 10-'
5.0 x 10-'
S.O x 10-'
5.0 i 10-'
S.fl x 10-'
J.I x 10'
3.0 x 10
3.0 x 10
I.S i 10?
mn
UNO
ECOLOGY
S.O x 10-'
5.0 x 10-'
1.4 x 10'
1.4 x 10<
1.4 x 10>
1.4 x 10'
1.4 I 10'
1.4 x 10'
N
N
N
H
2.0 x 10-'
2.0 x 10-1
2.0 x 10-'
2.0 x 10-'
2.0 x 10-'
2.0 x 10-'
2.0 x 10-'
2.0 x 10-'
2.0 x 10-'
•
S.O x 10-'
S.O X 10-'
N
ssf
w
U.K.
U.K.
1.3x10*
1.3I102
S.dlO2
MTIO
HSU
HMC
Don tot
Don Hat
*.6il02> Does Rat
K.O.
Ltm 2
MIQUIItn)
••HO
exceed Mil
TEST
METHOD1
X
Exceed Nate
Exceed Mi
It
TEST
EXKC-
TATIOHS?
«ST
COST)
iWWlf.
ALIQUOT4
1.
2.
3.
4.
TABLE WT:
TEST KTHOD
1. STAMMRO
2. OtfEtOP-
fCNTAL
3. UMUKMN
A. AAS
S. MO
C. WT
CHEMICAL
0. ESCA
E. K/NS
EXPECTEO TEST
SUCCESS: '
1. HICH
2. MODERATE
3.
TEST COST
I. KASONAN.E
Z. MODERATE
3. W«
SAMPLE ALIQUOT
1. AOEVJATE
2. MUCIML
3. INADEQUATE
4. DESAWIE
•tin of -2-5. S-2-6 «nd 5-2-7.
1. R«ed on level 2 iMchate study of s««ple S-2-6.
H.O. Not Detected.
*.«. Not lequlrBj on l«el 2.
-------
Table 3-13. Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples (Continued)
m
oo
.CATMOIY
71. UTHEIlim
74. COM1T
76. NH01IM
». mem
HMMtlU.
**•*&
wS&*'
asp1*-
forte fel*. FejOj
forrt* Nr«r»il*t
£33
In* SaUMn. f«S.
»•*»»
ryrlu. f««
totuitw Iron illl-
Ut*. CftS»20t
l»UM»l<» lot. fcl«J
total!, to
total ton. Co«2
totalttc. Co*)
total lam CtrtoMti,
M«t*4. toCOj.MjO
<£ to)
totalt Urfrl*.
to* (.5 to)
totalt felridtt. COS,
UjSj (u to)
total! AnMlc
SatfMt. Cafe*
(M to)
totalt Anmf*.
Catoj («s Co)
totolt fertaqrl.
toiCOU (*s Co)
totatUM Ohio*.
to*(n to)
total un HHroildo.
to(OI)? t«t Co)
«ta41« IM, «h*3
Nlctelaus. II*'
llctellc, II'3
IlcUltWi Sulftde.
Its (u It)
llrt*l «n*«tile.
lib (« It)
mil
Mt
«/•*<».>
t.l * 1»1
• •
1
• I
N
I
«
II
1
5.0 « I01
5.0 i 10'
i.O • 10>
5.0 i 10*
i.O i 10*
i.O > 10'
i.O > tO>
i.O i.lO1
i.O 1 10*
S.O > 10>
i.O > ID1
1.0 « 10
l.i i 10'
l.i I ID1
l.i I 101
l.i I 10'
MTE
WTO
•XtIM
t.l i 10>
1
1
1
«
1 ' -
1
i
•
7.S > 10*
7.5 > 102
7.S » 10?
7.S > 10*
r.s i 102
7.i-« 102
7.i x 102
7.5 i 10*
7.5 > 10?
7.5 i 10*
74 i (0*
l.i « 10<
2.3 i 10?
2.3 > 102
2.3 .10*
Z.3 « 10*
mn
wm
ECtUGT
H
1
M
• N
M
'N
>I.O M 10"
M
M
Z.i i 10*
Z.i « 10*
2.i > 10?
Z.S i 10*
Z.i a 10*
2.S « 10*
2.5 « 10*
2.5 > 10*
2.S X 10*
2.5 i 10*
2.5 > 10*
N
1.0 i 10'
1.0 « 10*
1.0 « 10'
1.0 > 10'
mn
LM0
H&'*,
l.t i I0l
~ •
•
•
•
•
•
•
N
l.i * 10
l.i. 10
I.S X 10
l.i i 10
l.i > 10
l.i > 18
t.i • 10
1.5 i 10
I.S • 10
l.i i 10
l.i i 10
J.O « 10-*
4.5 • 10-1
4.4 i 10-'
4.4 i ID"1
4.5 • 10-'
mn
1MB
ccouin
II
•
R
I
1
•
2.0 a 10*
M
M
s.o « 10-1
s.o « 10-1
s.o * i 10-'
i.O x 10-'
i.O » ID"'
t.O M 10-1
i.O x 10-'
i.O > 10-1
t.O I 10-'
5.0 « 10-'
It
2.0 i 10-*
2.0 i 10'*
2.0 i 10-*
2.0 i 10-*
Sf
*•!
»tf\
FntMt
i.*.
D.D.
N.O.
N.D.
N.O.
N.D.
MHO
iiftr
loud M
LCVtl 2
KQUtICO
t-ns
••NO
«$T
KCtwc'
teoouM Oit<
Sec Not* 1
See dolt
1
TEST
UKC-
TATIOB1
TUT
COST1
SAIVlf.
Aliquot*
TAM.CKEY
TESTKTHOO
1. STMEMD
I. KWLOf-
MCNTAL
J.
A. AAS
a. KRD
C. KT
OENICM.
D. CJCA
c. sc/ns
EXPICTCO TEST
SUCCESS:
1. HIGH
2. MKUTE
i. MHOM
1EST COiT '
i. KAsomaic
2. MOHMTE
3. MICH
SMPIE ALIQUOT
1. ADEQUATE
2. mKINAL
3. INADEQUATE
4. RESAWIE
• Sunutlon of S-i-5. $-?-»
-------
Table 3-13. Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples (Continued)
CATCCORT
77. rUTIHN
TI. arm
7i. sunn
W. COLO
1). 2IRC
COMMO
Mctel Oil*. MO
(MM)
Mcktl AMtmltfe.
IIS. (** H)
•ictcl ArMvIc S.I-
fMr, HMS (n M)
Mctol Cii>»jl.
MICDk
ElanUl nitlM.
«
Cepper
Cuprvn. to*
C«pr1c. C.*?
C«per rUori*.
0*2 (*sb)
C*»ptr 0*1*i. t«0,
bQO(tsCi)
topper V.H.U.
OOO*; (a ۥ}
Capper Mfldn. C>S.
CiizS (M Cut
nmin carkwtc.
C.CO] Into)
NilMftltc MMnl.
c*co3-aKOH)z (>s o)
Ctalcotyrite
mnenl. CrfeS?
Slim. ««
Slim- It*. V
Ctidi)
Sll»er OiUrlde.
A.C1 (« *»)
SU«tr CfMl*. «fl»
(n A,) ^ ^
Sllw SvlfMe.
AKS<« M)
Elemental «»I4
Zinc, Z»
ElnmUt UK. Zi.
Zinc lo>. Zi*Z
Zinc teMr. M>
(«z»)
mn
«IR
^/^(PI-)
1.» I tO1
l.S I 10'
1.5 > »<
4.) i It1
2.0 i *0
2.0 I 10?
2.0 « 10?
2.0 l IOZ
2.0 > 10?
2.0 I 102
2.0 « TOZ
2.0 > Id?
2.0 « 10*
2.0 i 10?
•
1.0 i 10<
1,0 i 10'
1.0 l 101
1.0 i 10'
1.0 I I01
II
4.0 « 103
4.0 i 103
4.0 x 103
4.0 « 103
mre
MTW
MULIM
2.3 I 10?
2.3 l 102
2.3 I 10?
».S « 10?
3.0 x 1C1
S.O » 10*
f.O « 10>
S.O x 10>
S.O x 103
1.0 l 10>
S.O i 10l
S.O x 10'
S.O > 10>
S.O x IOJ
•
2.S I 10?
2.S x 10?
Z.S x 10?
Z.S x 10?
Z.S i 10?
II
z.s > 10*
Z.S x 104
Z.S x 10*
Z.S i 104
mn
WTE*
rt/1
ECOLOGY
1.0 I 101
1.0 x 10*
1.0 X 10*
1.0 x 101
(« HI)
N
S.O x 10*
S.O x 10l
S.O x 101
S.O x tO1
S.O x 10'
S.O x 101
S.O x 10'
S.O x 10'
S.O x 10'
N
S.O x 10
S.O x 10
S.O x 10
S.O x 10
S.O x 10
M
1 .0 x ID?
1 .0 x 10?
1.0 x 10?
1 .0 x 10?
mn
UM>
MULIM
4.S x 10-'
4.S i 10-1
4.S I 10-'
1 .0 • 10
t.o > w?
1.0 i !•'
1 .0 x 10'
1.0 x W1
I.Ox 10*
1.0 I 10*
1.0 i I0>
1.0 i 10'
1 .0 I 10*
t.o i ra>
1
S.O I 10-'
S.O i 10-1
S.O I 10-'
S.O x 10-'
S.O x 10-'
II
S.O I 101
S.O x I01
S.O i 101
S.O i 10'
WT£
LMO
ECOLOET
2.0 x 10-2
2.0 x 10-?
z.o x i
stint.
ALIQUOT4
TWLE K1:
TEST METHOO
1. STAMMIS)
Z. DEVELOP-
KNTAL
I. IMHOWI
A. AAS
>. MO
C. HET
CHEH1CAL
D. ESCA
E. OC/ffi
. EXPtntD TEST
SUCCESS:
1. HIGH
Z. HOOEMTE
3,
TEST COST
1. REASONAKf
2. NXXMTE
3. Nl«
SWtlE M.IOUDT
1. ADEQUATE
2. NAIKJIW.
3. INADEOUATt
4. KSAWlt
•tlon of S-Z-S. S-Z-6 and S-?-7.
I. B*se4 on Level 2 letclHte study of smple 5-2-6.
• .D. Not Detected.
N.R. Not Required on Level
-------
Table 3-13. Level 2 Data on FBC Emission Samples (Continued)
CATEtOW
K. CMMIUH
•3. MUOMT
M. CUIIM
IS. UMNIIM
Of. TMKIW
CONKMB
I1M Sulrttt. InSO|
(••to)
I2
CMriw Stlfl*. US
U»C4)
UfelMi 0»M*. MO
U* ")
Ihrcvry. HC
ElMMUl Mtrc«7. Ng
fercifnwt. UK"
MrcwU, H>"
Mercuric felfld*.
M
Mrturlc Cklorl*.
HgCI;
W"- *
Urlw. t. (Ct»3.
U«4. biOj)
rrtftodjctM. fr
IflJ
4.0 • 10>
f.O 1 10'
1.0 i I01
1.0 i I0t
1.0 > 10'
1.0 • 101
S.O • I0>
i.O > I0>
S.O i 10)
S.O i I0>
S.O > 101
b.ll » tOl
9.3 i U>3
1.7 i I04
S.) » I0<
S.3 « 10*
I.I i I05
K
*.0 i 10
4.2 > 10?
mil
Mtn
J£k
Z.S t W*
I.S i.M*
S.O t M>
S.O t I01
S.O • 10'
S.« > I0>
S.O i 10*
1.0 i Ml
1.0 » M>
1.0 • »l
1.0 ( 10*
1.0 i I0>
i.o i iai
2.) i 10*
S.S I 10*
1.7 > »0*
7.* i H$
1.7 a 10*
»
t.O > U>4
(.3 I 103
mil
unu
tower
1.0 » 10?
1.0 «' 10>
1.0 * 10
1.0 t 10
1.0 « 10
1.0 > 10
1.0 « 10
2.S « 10*
2.S « 10*
Z.S x 102
2.S i 102
2.S I 102
2.S > 10?
N
N
N
N
N
N
S.O « 10?
N
MUTE
UMD
NtlllH
S.O I 101
S.O • 10»
1.0 « 10-1
1.0 . 10-'
1.0 « 10*1
1.0 « 10-t
1.0 > 10- '
2.0 * 10-2
2.0 x 10-2
2.0 • 10-2
2.0 « 10-2
2.0 11 10-2
2.0 x 10-*
4.4 a 102
1.1 « 10'
I.S i 10J
I.S > 10'
3.4 > 103
N
1.2 » 102
1.3 > 10
MTC
UM
itoioei
2.0 a 10-'
2.0 I 10-1
{.0 • 10-3
2.0 « 10-3
2.0 i 10-3
2.0 « 10-3
2.0 I 10-3
S.O x 10-1
S.O « 10-1
S.O . 10-1
S.O * 10- 1
S.O « 10-1
s.o • lo-i
I
. N
•
M
N
R
1.0 « 10
II
&
'57!
PrMMt
rrttat
S.O
jiMo*
N.*.
• .0.
• 0.
RATIO
Ittrt M
taM4 M
ICWL 2
ttquino
T-ICS
»••>
:n^nu.il 04
Dot* «ot ««
EKMdl Hi
TtST ,
ICTHOO'
U
U
cttd Mtl
J
TEST
EOTC-
TATIONS'
TEST
COST1
SAMPLE.
ALIOUOt4
TABlt ttt:
IEST MTMOO
1. JIANOAM
2. OC»a»-
tUHH.
3.
. AAS
. UD
. vn
CMCMCAL
. ESCA
. CC/NS
EIPEC1EO TEST
SUUCSS:
. HIM
. MODERATE
ESI COST
. tEASOMBlE
MXKMtE
. HIGH
SAM>LC AllQUQI
. ADEQUATE
WKINM.
. IWUXqUATC
ftESAMlE
ullon of S-2-5. S-2-6 <*> S-2-7.
»*»«d M U**l 2 letclutt itudy of >«vlc S-Z-6.
* D
I.I.
kit OtlKttd.
tot Ic^uirtd «n level 2.
-------
Table 3-14. Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials
L«v»l 2 InchaU Sturfln »f Owrflw M
D. UIMM
•. fMM
It. HUB1BH
B. umimm
». COIM
a. mum
n. MDIM
M. OUIW
—
ti
ii«
IW (•> tl|
iijcij (a ui
!•
•**
MM
•»
(
«•{««)
•*'
O*1
•»
•«**
fcO(M It}
M-MA-Sllt
l«nP ^
**•>!•. *
IkOHilMi ta. H|~
•Milw Oil*.
MfMtai HwrMr,
•**<•» HI
Ibpnlw Mfttct
•*SC» In*)
•*«.«.. «»,
(•» 14)
MaBlte. «iC»j
«<0l(»"5r
teteta (« mi
blcta In. U"
CildM FliM-Mt.
«z
Ctlcloi ClUxrtl.
€KO
blcfv talfate.
USk
telMritl. %a>)-
W»J
•nt
P^!^)
M »
U »
».» M
M m
t.t •
j.i ••
!.• •>
z.i w
i.n i^
•.i* ••
M
t.»
I.I
*.• « W1
*.tl I W>
I.«1 • N*
*.l • !•>
(.( I !•>
C.t • I*1
«.• > W1
(.• i W>
l.t • M1
I
I
•
I
mn
£
1.1 « *?
1.1 « H*
1.1 * Mt
1.1 tMt
J.I .10?
l.l 1 1*
1.1 i M*
I.I I M*
1
I
I.B < M*
i.n • M*
I.I I M
LI • M
LI • M
*.l I M*
*.l I M*
!.» • W»
f.l I 10*
*.l I II*
».0 • M*
t.l I M*
».» i M*
t.t , 111
I
1
1
I
•nt
mm
•VI
raun
Ul lot
>.l l W>
J.t-1 MY
3.1 I M>
1
«
I
1
1
t.l. 10*
I
1
5.S > II
S.I. W
S.t i M
•.» t Mr1
i.r i to*
I.I I 1(0
1.7 I 10*
1.7 I 10*
(.7 . 10*
8.7 . 10*
•.7 . 10*
l.f . II*
•
•
1
II
urn
LMD
,3%
7.1 1 W'
!.*> 10)
(.!« W
(.1 l 11
1
•
J.H > HP
t.<* i rai
(.1 » 10-2
«.l l 10-2
f .0 » IT2
I.Sl I02
l.ll 10*
3.0 i 10*
!.»« 10?
1.8 I I0>
I.Sl Iff2
1.8. ID?
!.«« t«2
I.R « 102
II
II
II
II
mn
UM
i^S.
7.J I W1
•
1
I
1
4.« . M
1
1
I.I > M-l
I.I 1 !«-!
I.I . If
1.7 I ID?
1.7 I I0t
2.0 > 10?
1.7 > Mf
1.7 . lot
1.7 l I0t
1.7 . 10t
1.7 > lit
l.t . M
II
•
I
1
W
l.fcltf
1.7 x
l.t X
l.l.
».t.
•.0.
1.4 «
l.l . 1
MfM
W
IB*
I03
I
0*
ma t
KOMKB
I-TB
•HO
CWMVt
Dan Ma
Don *>•
Don Hot
Cucertt
J!?Li
(C1MT
HiU
t Em<4 '
lt*f*et>
bad M
fete
TOT
IVtC-.
in ion'
tatt
bU
to
U$T.
CUT'
«M\E.
w.igwr
T*M.C KtT:
TEST trnao
otmw-
IMIM.
MS
. no
. Kt
CMUHCM.
. CSM
K/K
vccnonsT
9KCBS:
mat
mtmu
e«t
mown
mat
tMOU M.MIWT
•0»1» u^lc J-Z-J. uwtlM .f KMIc «H( b»itc H.O. Not Detected
-------
Table 3-14. Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials (Continued)
Ltvtl 2 ludutf Shitfla »»
M 1*4 MUrUl*
CAnMM
». STMMIM
11 . IM1W
37. MM
11. UIMMM
N. MUIIM
(MNMO
Urwrtlw
Strati* ton,
lr** (m *M
ttrarth* nwrlfe.
Sff| (It Sr)
SUVtttlM Mfll*.
v*H(« v)
Mrii*. M
Itrtai !•>. 14**
(MM
(via falfHt.
MS (»!•)
ItriM tkl*-
ttftOMU . **CS)
(M HI
tiriM Flwrl*,
faf] (u b)
lirlMl CutawU.
143] (H M
UrlM Sultett.
feSI* (Ml*)
tm>. 1
0**U. M) (M 1)
Eir"4-^
tm Out*, 1,0)
AlHriM. *t
AlWllW IM.
*!*»•
IMIU. AljOj-
IHjfl (H All
•Hr»u4 AliiriiMi
StlluU (it Al)
*)«» [• Al (U>4),].
Ol?0), (« *lp *
*I«1M 0>IM,
"A
Ctlllw. «»
ClMMUl Sp«C<«.
fa
CillOM. *.*'
(» b)
mtc
«li
Mt/^t^l
1.1 • tO3
1.1 < 1*1
1.1 1 IB1
1.1 .!•>
l.t I If
!.» i lot
1.0 > I0>
f.O > I02
i.o i \af
s.o • it1
>. a i w>
3.1 i If
1.1 • I*1
1.1 i 10'
1.0 i I04
l.» i l»)
t.t • I01
».< < 10*
i.Z I Iff1
11 I lfr>
1.0 i Iff4
i.O i II^
S.O I ID1
5.0 > I0>
mn
Mm
•tfl
KA.W
4.« • «•>
«.« » 1«*
4.* I M*
4.« > M*
».» < M>
l.t l 10*
i.e > Ml
i.* > U*
S.O i M>
$.» • Ifl
».» > M>
«.; • w
4.? .Ml
4.7 • M*
l.t • H*
l.t • U*
4.0 » W*
1.0 I It*
l.t > ra*
1.0 i 10*
15 • M*
;.4 i 10*
;.4 i ia*
1.4 • 11*
MK
MTU
icaon
•
i
i
•
l.t » 103
t.i > 101
t.t • I0>
2.S > I01
t.i I 10*
I.S • M1
l.S 1 1C1
Z.t l 10"
i.s « to*
t.i • 10*
1
1.0 i I0>
1.0 » 10>
1.0 I I01
1 .0 i I0>
1.0 > I0>
•
II
II
"
nun
IMO
A'&
t.t I M
t.t > 40
1.2 l M
f .2 • M
1.0 l M
1.0 l U
1.0 • M
1.0 « It
1.0 « 10
1.0 • M
1.0 l M
».3 > 10
9.1 i 10
t.l • 10
1.0 • 10*
l.» • Id*
l.f . 10*
l.t. 10?
l.t . I0t
1.* • ID1
I.O > 10?
1.5 i IV
1.5 • 101
l.t • ID2
mn
UM
(££:
•
*
•
•
I.O
*•*
t.o
I.O
i.O
t.o
t.o
S.O . 10
t.o . 10
f.O » 10
I
101
•
2.0
t.o
t.o
•
*
I
H
yy
(pp.)
«4
1.9 l H
N.O.
3.1 i 10
7.4 > 1
».o.
WHO
w
r* no.
4 o£
r OM
Ulfl t
MWIKS
VIB
»*•
> Hot Ut«
•at CK«
l tol fic<
ICJT
(•moo1
M (tatt
Bl MU
14 nm
IESI
MMC-
TATIONS2
HIT,
COST>
-------
Table 3-14. Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials (Continued)
CO
L*»«l 1 Itictutt UudtK of 0«
onion
4». m«
41. mum
•i. OHM*
43. SILICOH
C9VQUR)
til Me, «.'J
(« to!
Ml*. StjO,
(it tot
IMta. In
IX1« Iv. In*'
Tkilll«. II
ThlllOTI. Tl'l
HnlllC. TI'J
mit
in
J.O . 10'
s.« . 10)
.» • to?
.» I 10*
.0 • ID*
.» i 10*
.0 i 10*
CI4WDUI Clrt*. I I.S • IOJ
Coil
Ctttl*. C-
brtawte. 0)3-2
Huitmu. W9]
C.rto^l. W-
bite* taml*
UltOT OlOll*
SUM, Sl*4
SIIICM. SI
OrtMlllluU.
HO?!"""'
Silicon Dlaitdt ,
St»
SlllOTl Cirtl*. SIC
Cn».uu, 6.**
(« to)
Gtrwilc. It*4
(•I S.)
Gtnwimn S«1'<*.
taS (u it)
tenanlc Svlflct,
drmM, b«4
(•I 6.)
Q»mtil» oil*.
n
i
«
n
"
4.0 • tip (3S)
f.O i TO* (WOO]
7.0 • 10*
1 • > 10*
L_ •
•
1.0 i ID4
•
1.0 i 10*
S.i i ID*
S * i 10*
s.e » ID*
i.6 < 10*
S S > 10*
S.t i 10*
S » i 10*
rrioo led K
mil
«n>
w&m
14 , 10*
7.. . Ml
S > l«3
.» i 10)
.1 • 1*3
.i i 103
5 > IS1
.3 • 10*
II
1
II
II
II
(.0 • 10s
R
I.I « IB*
l.i » 10s
1
II
IS i 10s
•
I.S i 10s
a. 4 i la5
84 .103
a. 4 i ioJ
» 4 i lip
a. 4 i up
84 i I0]
8.4 • rJ
»ttrl<1*
ccmosT
. •
•
ii
i
•
•
•
i
•
•
*
•
•
« 0 i 10
•
t
m
I
-
•
II
•
I
II
•
H
.
•
•
mat
uw
I.I • 10*
I.S • 10*
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
I.I » 10*
II
II
H
II
N
V*
v»
II
J.O » 10*
II
II
3.0. JO*
II
3.0 » 10?
1.7 i 10
1.7 i 10
1.7 i 10
1.7 « 10
1.7 > 10
1.7 < 10
1.7 < in
mil
IMO
tenon
N
II
H
II
II
I
I
•
«
II
M
II
H
•/«
VA
Z.I i It
II
I
II
I
1
I
I
R
II
N
N
II
N
•Only saiple S-Z-3. iunMtlon of acidic md (Mite. H.O. Hot Detected
S
H.O. ,
».0._j
»-0._j
2.6 I H
H.O.
MTIO
,!, -
UKl 2
momno
»-tts
••HO
Cic<
TtST
ICTHOO1
•efe Mte
TKt
MtlOKS2
TtSfj
SMVtC.
«.IO"JOl'
HE «'•
TEST ICTIBO
. STMOMD
. Dt«lW-
mmm
. us
. m
. WET
acmon,
. isc*
tan
irtcito iisi
sucusv
KIOI
mmn
nst COST
SMIU
lorn
Mtqont
-------
Table 3-14. Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials (Continued)
Uvtl Z ludul* Sfcrflt* of Owf Im ltd hUrUI*
CMUftn
«. TM
M. IUO
Tfc) Oil*. MI
IU. !•
Ill I*"
^tjM|ta S»«4
UM. Ik
MlMM. lk«
M~K. Ik*
(Mlk)
UMHHMMl.
IM (M Ik)
UM Mlatt.
M0«(u Ik)
UM Soirau.
lk» (M Ik)
UMtekMt*.
IMS] (u Ik)
iC^Chl-**)
Pktrt, |M fki
•SMTlulkT
UMfeMMIt.
IkNMt IM Ik)
•MraitaH
Mull Cr**Mn.
Ma. ta
•Me fcU, MO]
S5JK'
NU
tmtmtt, MJ
CyMOfM. €2*2
Ittrl*. •*
WtnU. NO]-
Nltrltt. "Or
*— '-• ««•
mri
l.t • M*
g
n
I
1.1 I If
t.i « M*
l.i • Mt
l.i > &
l.i • M*
l.i • 10*
l.i I Itt
l.i • M*
l.i • If*
l.i I 10*
I.I • M*
l.i 1 IB1
I.I • I0» (.1)
i.O i 10*
i.O i M1
*.t i M9
I.I i 10* (Ml
l.t I 10* (IS)
I.O • Iff*
I
1
II
1
MK
MIU
l.i • II*
1
n
1
t.i I 10*
l.S • M>
2.1 I lt<
2.1 < M*
2.1 > M*
2.1 i 10*
1.1 > M>
t.i i I01
2 i i IP*
t.i l 10*
t.i • I0>
t.i i I0>
1 J
i.O i I0>
l.i • 10*
It i 10*
i.O i 10*
t.i 1 10*
i.e • 10)
ii
N
N
1
mil
MTU
tOLOCT
N
N
N
I
l.t I 10
l.t • It
i.O i 10
I.O i 10
1.0 * 10
i.O > 10
i.O i 10
i.O • 10
I.O > 10
i.O I W
i.O i 10
i.O > 10
N
t.i • 10
4.1 1 I0>
•
l.S I 10
i.O I 10
l.S i 10
I
II
N
II
mil
LMO
-•n
i.t
N
1
N
I.I • M-t
i.t • W>
i.O i M-t
i.O I 10- »
i.O » W1
i.O i 10-'
i.O • 10-1
i.o • ir1
i.t I IT1
i.t • 10- 1
i.O I M-*
I.O
l.i • M>
m
I.O
s.o
.1.0
N
N
II
•
MK
two
1
*
I
I
I.Oi 10-'
i.o < to-'
I.O a 10-'
I.O I 10-1
I.O • It-i
I.O 1 10- «
I.O > 10-'
I.O » 10-1
I.O 1 10-1
I.O • 10-*
1.0 i 10-1
i.o • io-2
t.o • to-i
N/.
i.o i Mr1
I.O W1
i.O 10-*
i1
».o.
.1 1 II
uno
i1
i«U I
nqumo
T'tlJ
TIST ,
TIST
rim-.
TATIOB*
DM* Not C>M*d Nat*
-
TUT.
COST1
MM1E.
AllQUOT4
TMCi UT:
TEST MM*
I. SIMDMM
I. MKUT-
1.
*. MS
«. MO
C. MCT
OfMIM
t. ESCA
c. ce/K
t. ciKrru nvi
succtts
I. MM
I. MKMn
1. ttSI COST
I.
2.
1. NIOI
4. SMffll MIOJOT
I. HUKIM
i. imxgtnc
4.
•Only >Mpli S-2-1. it«Mtlun of icldlc ud b*slc- N.O. Not Detected
-------
Table 3-14. Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials (Continued)
'•"•' * '•
union
48. MOSNOUS
4». MStllC
5). nswra
corona
HnnMni. r
nmitiiu. POj-'
(« n
UtteWfeU,
H2»V (« »)
nmiktat. HI)
«in>» nk AcM,
•I"*
rtunttm
**u»in<*
rtM*i>u. rat-'
«rM«(c, Aj
nttillle Annie
Anmm. *«»)
ArVt.lt. •«•*
feMMU, «»0«->
(««*»)
Anotlte. AiOv)
(MAS)
«rM»1d«. Aj-3
(« *»)
(nine. Ai»j
(runic Irtoilfe.
MA
Anita, Irl-
"!*•»*
fcrtWr, Ifcul. SO
(itlknm)V)
taJtaMc (itltalc)
Stltlw. SMI,
(It S»)
tat 'won Sul-
"«•• a**)
fatimr. st
llMrtK. ll~~
llMtlltll III-
Mtft. II
llivtlwn. 11*1
(nit)
tlMtktc. «l*5
(» •')
\&
1.0 » Vf
1.0 i ID7
1.0 I 10* (0.11
.1.0 . 10'
Ov*rfl4M B«
on
«ni
£'.
1.) i 10*
1.! • 10*
1 S i 10*
1.* > 10)
1 J i 10*
1.0 m 10* '• I % « 10*
!
II 1
2.0 > 10
2.0 i 10
2.0 « 10
2.0 • 10
i.O i 10
2.0 i 10
2.0 > 10
2.0 i 10
2.0 > 10
s.o • to1
5.0 « 10*
5.0 • 10?
5.0 « ><£
5.0 > 10?
5.0 « 10*
5.0 x 102
4.1 » 10*
4.1 > 10*
4.1 < 10*
4.1 * 10?
J.S « 10*
2.S < 10?
2.1 i 10*
! 5 « 10?
2 S • Id2
2 S i 10*
25 . M«
:.5 i to2
25 « I02
».S • ?0*
».S i I03
?.i > !0>
7.5 • 10)
'.5 » I03
r 5 . 10)
;.s > ia>
(I • 10]
s.; , ioJ
•I.I « I01
i • . !0)
1 Miterlsl-
WTt
WTt*
1.9/1
CCOIOCT
s.o > 10-1
s.o . 10-1
5.0 I 10-1
II
4.5 i N>>
*
•
5.0 « 10' 1
S.O i 10'
5.0 i 10'
5.0. 10'
S.O > 10'
S.O • 10'
5.0 • 10*
S.O i I01
S.O • I01
J.O i &
(IS Sb)
2.0 i ID7
2.0 « 10*
2.0 > 10?
2.0 > 102
2.0 > 10?
2.0 i I02
X
X
N
n
mtt
uwo
N^A
).0 i 10
1.0 > 10
1.0 I 10
V*
3.0 I 10
1.0 » 10
II
5.0 i 10-'
5.0 i 10-'
5.0 I 10-'
5.0 > 10-'
5.0 i 10-1
5.0 I 10-'
5.0 > 10-'
5.0 i 10°
5.0 I 10-'
1.5 > 10
1.5 • 10'
1.5 i 101
1.5 i 10*
1.5 I 101
1.5 • lot
1.5 i lo'
1.2 « 10'
1.2 • in'
1.2 « 101
1.2 » 1C1
mit
IMO
CCOIOCT
1.0 i 10-1
1.0 > It-)
1.0 i 10-'
•/•
t.o
•
I
1.0 i 10-'
1.0 > 10-'
1.0 I 10-'
1.0 I 10-'
1.0 • 10-'
1.0 i 10-'
1.0- 1 10-'
1.0 > IO-1
i.o > to-'
4.0 i 10-'
(If Sb)
4.0 > 10-'
4.0 « W1
4.0 . 10-'
4.0 i 10-'
4.0 » 10-'
«.o » 10-'
II
«
n
H
B
««/t
H.O.
N.D.
H.O.
N.D.
MTIO
w
•Only sanple S-2-3. sunutlon o' icldfc »nd (>ulc. H.O. Not Detected
U«U 2
KOUIKO
»-ns
»-m
TEST .
wnae1
Ttsr
cmc-,
HtlOIB1
nst
cost'
ymr
•liquor
J
^
TMtt »f»:
TCSt HCTUOO
I. STMMRD
J.
.
3. umwin
*. *AS
*. »o
C. MI
CHENICM.
D. CSCA
C.
tincrco its!
SOCCCSS:
1. HISH
2. WKMtE
3.
TESI COS!
I. MASOMM.E
Z. nODCMIE
3 HUM
SAMPLE AllOWt
t. WgUATE
2. HMCIM1
3. IMIOCQUAtC
I. RESAMPIE
-------
Table 3-14. Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials (Continued)
CUUM
'Si-aim
M. SOGUm
M. nULMIIM
it. niMIOC
OJM. 0]
••*k falta>. !•
MfMl. f*
Mfe*. «»-»
MflM. Mf*
tti«m«iu. tor
lulhr TrteiMi.
»1
Mfkrte AcM.
«l«l
lalfhr WMlAi
Hi
IM^fM Mfl*.
CaMM Mttlfl*.
«»l
CM.
WlMlM. I*
flMMUl toltllM.
s*
S«lMM>. Vt-J
Rwr-11*"
Si'sr1*1"
Hllnim IilolOt.
Ntte
CKMC MMtat*.
Clt{(H$*l
UlMlM Mold*.
M»lHfal
Tttlwli^ T*
lallurl*. T«-'
lillxrlu, I«O|-;
(M I.)
TtllwaU. T«fl4
(-T.)
Fl«erl* Iw, r
Nydngn fluorld..
W
•MI
.«Jfi*4
t.« « M* (I.I)
•
I
I
•
•
•
i.a • M>
I.J • M*
I.I • M* (Ml
t.« > M* (HI
4.4 |M»
>.. . W
2.* >M<
i.« • U<
t.» . uf
2.* . !•»
t.D • M> I.HI
1* .M>
i.* • M2
i.a i >y
10 > !•»
1.0 l !•*
1.0 . I0>
Z.S i l»3
I 0 I 1O1
wIMMiU Ul*
Mil
•s?
M£O
WA
1
l.i • 10*
>.• t M1
I.J 1 10*
«.• • I*5
WA
t.t i I01
t.« • l«>
i.» > 10*
t.O • 10*
i a • 10'
t.O • 10*
(M V.)
i.« • 10*
i.« I 101
I.I • I01
1.5 i ID1
l.i > ID*
l.i "ID3
1.1 > 10*
JO i 10*
MTt
MTU
CCOLOfT
WA
I
•
*
I
I
I .
4.1 I \ 10*
I.S > 10*
(« s«)
J.5 i 10*
Z.i i I01
II
•
II
II
»
H
mil
UMO
^
VA
:
•
1.0 i 10'
4.0 i 10*
V*
(VA
*/A
1.0 > M-l
1.0 i 10-'
1.0 > 10- '
1.0 » W1
1.0 i IO-I
1.0 i 10-'
(M it)
1.0 • 10-'
1.0 i If'
1.0 • 10
1.0 i 10
1.0 i IV
1.0 > 10
; i • ID'
Hit
mn
uw
u£fe
VA
1
t.O 1 10*
1
VA
VA
V«
t.O > 10-2
i.O > 10-'
t.O > IO->
t.O • 10-2
t.O » ID'2
t.O • 10-2
<«!•>
t.O i 10-'
S.O I 10-2
n
*
ii
•
H
V
351
W
D.O.
N.O.
K.O. ,
K.O.
N.D.
MTIO
W
tima
nation
T'lU
1
1
i
i
i
1
\
1
1
1
tar .
KTHOO1
TDT
IIKC-.
TAItOK1
S!»
M*U.
AIMM4
_J
i
TMU «£»:
TUT «TMO
STAMMIO
NUTM.
MS
UN
NT
acmcAt
(XA
-------
fable 3-14. Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials (Continued)
uncon
«. CHOI*
M. SUMO!
Lewi 2 L«rt.U SMi« of Ovwftw B»d N.t.n.1*
COWOIM
^.^u.
»i.r.te. cioj-
CM,
d 1.
eOCIJ
"J * iiu Oil*rl«r.
Wl
Irwtdr l«. tr*
•**•»» *mt*.
ScaMliB, Jc
SurKllH IM. S«*J
(n tl)
(H Tl)
TltWlM DtUltft.
1167 (« II)
IITO.I. !<-.
Mt (M Ir)
taMlw. t
ElHMtjl
IiM>
i
i
i.a > 19*
».« « t«>
i
1.0 • l»*
i.j i nf
1 S.) < 10*
1.0 • I0>
(.0 * l»>
6.0 i 1»>
5.0 i I 10*
II
II
1.1 > 10s
S.O i 10
t.O i 10*
*.0 > 10*
» 0 i 104
r.i > to4
7.1 « 10*
J.i i I03
;.s i 10'
t.i I 10^
J.5 i I03
*t[
n*rt«
CCM.OCT
II
*
II
II
•
1)
II
II
II
In
»[»>4fcl
9.? i ID?
t.i • to?
1.2 • I02
II
II
1.5 i \af
1.5 > 10*
1.5 • IOJ
1.5 « 10*
. mn
urn
.VI
z.« « to3
•
ii
i
«/«
I0<
S.O i 10
5.9 • 10
5 •) i 10
5. a • 10
IWTE
IMO
N
II
s
II
II
n/»
H/«
n
N
«/A
II
1.6 i 10
1.6 . 10
).( > 10
II
H
J.O l 10-'
3.0 « 10-'
J.O « 10-'
3.0 • 10-'
S31
w
H.O.
TTo—
1.0.
J.O. _
N.O.
N.O.
N.O.
N.D.
Mr 10
w
•Only sMpIt S-2-J. luwtlon of acidic and t»sic. *.0. Not Detected.
am J
BOUIWO
t'fU
<•«
UJT
rtsr
UPtC-
I
L
IBI-
s*nr
IWU KM:
. TtST METHOD
I. ST«MMM
2. OtltlW-
*irr»i.
3. innam
«. MS
B. KM)
C. WT
0. ESCA
c. cc/ie
. HPCCTIO TEST
SUCCESS:
1. MISH
2. IDDCMTC
. TEST OUT
i. lusmuu
{. HOBCMTt
). MICH
SM*\C OlIOUJT
i.
2.
i.
4.
-------
Table 3-14. Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials (Continued)
Uttl t IMCMU StwIUt
M HiUrUI*
anon
w. IWIIM
17. TamiM
U. OMMIM
—
•W— *
*M*IU. IT1
l«M«t« ftWI*.
N(M«I
tMMItfi trlMl*.
11*1 (««>
•M«lMiIMm-
Ml*. *itt|. (M 1)
(•MMrMt-
(.1*. ?i«| (M 1)
UMlhM br»l*.
K (all
IwWlMlhM-
»ltt*. H (M 1)
MM«ta MlriO,
W (« »)
tMMyl hllflU.
MMl-ttlO (« »)
•to**, »«
•M»lc. »•*
•)•»(•• 0>l«n.
IM, H>A (« »)
IMUIM fe>.
1|*»
Omaha, Cr
CftrMMl. Cr*'
(«Cr)
OfMtC. Cr«»
(MCr)
OWVMtM. CrCV*
(•• Cr) -
CtowlUt, Crj04-*
<« Cr| W
Dlonatui.
trffTln U)
O>n>4,» c.rko«,l .
Cr
>.« • W
I.* I I0>
t.t » \tt
J.O I 10*
1.8 I 10*
t.O I 10*
t.O • 10>
».» i Id2
t.O I I0>
t.O I I0>
1.2 • 10*
l.t E 10*
t.i > It4
1.0 • 10'
1.0 • 10
1.0 > 10
1.0 I 10
1.0 • 10
1.0 • 10
1.0 • 10
1.0 • 10
1.0 I 10
1.0 « 10
1.0 I 10
•II
?.
(.t 1 »>
i.t 1 1*1
t.t . •>
t.t 1 I**
t.t • l*>
t.t > w>
t.t .»>
t.i .M>l
t.f .•>
t.i • I*1
1.1 1 •*
1.1 i M1
1.1 • I*1
It . >*•
M . nf
t.i • M<
t.i . «<
t.i i M'
t.S • Ift
t.i • l»)
t.i • W<
2.i > M1
Z.i I !>'
t.i • M*
IMI
MTU
Kiuei
l.t I I0<
l.i i M>
l.t • I0>
l.t 1 10*
It i 10>
l.i . 10*
l.t. M>
l.i > W>
l.f • 10*
1 i • 10*
•
•
*
•
t.t i 10*
t.i • 10*
t.i i 10*
I i . 10*
l.i • 10*
2,i • 10*
t.t I 10*
t.i i 10*
I S . 10t
t.i I 10*
MIC
UM
M
t.O i 10
t.t i M
t.O. 10
i.O . 10
1.0 I M
t.«i M
t.O > 10
i.O > 10
10 i 10
i.O . 10
t.i i 10*
t.i . 10*
41 > It*
l.t i 10*
i.O > 10- !
i.O • W1
i.O . 1C' '
i.O > 10-'
i.O > 10-'
i.O i 10-'
t.O i 10-'
I.O i 10- '
s.o • io-'
i.o i io->
mil
UM
(C0?&
3.0 I 10-'
1.0 I 10- *
1.0 • 10- *
1.0 I 10-'
1.0 i tO"1
1.0 . 10-1
1.0 > IO-1
1.0 I ICC'
1.0 • 10-1
1.0 • 10-'
II
•
•
•
i.O > 10-'
i.O • 10- 1
1.0 « 10- '
i.O I 10-'
i.O . 10-1
i 0 • IO-1
i.O i IO->
t.O i 10-1
i.O i 10-'
i.O i 10-'
%
•*l
N.O.
K.O.
K.O.
HIM
W
UHl t
KWKt
»•«»
MB
TWI ,
(CM*1
1UI
unc-
TUIOlV
int.
COtl'
UWll.
M.HMI4
IMtl UT
iur KTMOO
I. IIMBMD
t. nOUOf-
man.
i.
». Mt
». OB
C. «T
OMICM.
0. tS£A
I. OC/Mt
. tiftcn* tcsi
VCCUS:
i. mai
t.
. TtSI COSI
I.
.
l. NIBI
4. ywtc Miquot
i. wtquiii
t. MIMIMI
1. IIWMUMI
«.
•Only Simple S-2-3, »>«Htidn of acidic
-------
Table 3-14. Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials (Continued)
cncon
•». Mima
ID. IMUItl
7t. mcMsc
71. MM
i**ti :
WffMO
MMOMto
Bui* IH. CrfQi
•M U* tr)
IrmOnmt*,
MNtlwCr)
M>MBM.M>
»l|»*nu. M*I
MlMta. I*41
*>I|M|U, MM-'
tui»)
lfcljllii» Vilfldr,
"«*l (« »»
Mll»*M» Ulwldt.
•*3 (« *)
T«*fUH. «
STSS.'R:^
TwfiM Oluiri*.
«*««««)
•tlfrartt* HlMnl,
MMI-M04 (M V)
*•*•«%*. ni
tfcljHH.1. »*?
Italic. Ik*)
HiiMiMiiU. imr
|4»I»J
Itiijli 1.1 Oil*.
MO Us »)
•»fMw Dint*.
M» («*>}
••tv^M Etftomt*.
*COj (« ft.)
*»|»io.i telftU.
ItdOt (n Mi)
l>ipiu« felfl*.
mat in in)
In* Clrtonylt.
frtCO)}. F^COJ,.
ftj M
S.O > 1»>
S.O l HP
f.a > 10)
S.O I IO*
S.O i I0>
S.O I 10*
1.0 i Id3
1
t.o > to'
1.0 I I05
S.O I I01
S.O I 103
S.O • 10)
S.O • 10)
S.O I ID1
S.O > ID1
S.O • 103
S.O i IOJ
SO > I0>
1.0 i 10?
l>0 • 10)
1.0 i toJ
S.O i 103
o' Owrfleii
MTC
•m
&\>
f.S • M*
M i 10*
t.t > 10*
T.S > Ml*
r.» . W
r.s i 10*
».S i 10*
; s a to4
I.S • 10*
•
I.S i I*1
I.S i 10*
I.S • 10*
?.S I 10?
I.S > I02
J S i 10?
?.S • I0>
I.S i 10*
I.S i M?
l.s i ra>
I.S i 10*
1.1 « 10*
I.S • I0>
I.S < 10)
7.5 i I0»
ted Hiterli
MTI
wno
ccauR
J.S i I01
t.S • 10*
i.o • ie)
1.0 • HP
?.o • 10)
;.o • 10)
7.0 I I0>
7.0 I 101
II
I
•
1
1 .0 > 10?
1.0 I 10?
1.0 • 101
1.0 > 102
1.0 I 10*
1.0 > 10?
1.0 i 10?
1.0 > 10?
1.0 « 10?
II
I.S i 10?
2.S i 10?
II
I*
mn
uw
£%
s.o « to-1
*.• • w-1
I.S < M?
I.S > HP
I.S i l»?
I.S . 10?
I.S • 10?
1.1 i 10?
3.0 I I0>
I
1.0 • tO1
).0 i W1
S.O I W>
S.O I 10-'
s.o i ir<
S.O i W1
s.o i Mr1
S.» • 10-'
S.O « 10-1
S.O • 10-'
S.O i 10-'
?.l • 101
I.O i 10
J 0 I 10
I.S > 10?
mn
UM
tauter
5.0 i 10-1
s.o .10-1
1.4 t 10'
1 .* I 101
1.* > I0>
l.« 1 Id1
1 .4 I I0<
1.4 I 10'
R
I
II
II
I.O I 10-1
I.O > 10-'
7.0 I 10-'
I.O • 10- '
I.O i 10-'
I.O • 10-'
I.O I 10-1
I.O » 10-'
?.o » to-'
N
S.O i-W1
s.o > 10-'
II
i
1.0 • 1
N.O.
N.O.
8.0 « 1
IATIO
mn
,'
urn i
tamo
I-TtS
MB
DMS
D.
rat
mm'
tot C«ct«4
« Nat E>
TOT
WU-,
TAriOB?
Hate
c»d Natf
TOT
our)
SMU.
•.ram*
TMIE
TISTICTMOO
STMDMO
ucvaor-
KRTM.
MS
in
WT
amiCM.
CSCA
cc/ie
JftCTEO TCST
SIKCCSS:
TtSl COST
. KASOMOIE
. WKMTt
. MM
SMVU ALIQUOT
. WtflWIE
li»wqu«!t
•EMIflC
•Onljr simile S-Z-3,
lon of «idlc and b*sic. It.D. Hot Detected
-------
Table 3-14. Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials (Continued)
on won
ri. Mmniw
M. CHM.T
74 MODIIM
It. MCUL
carom
NMWIIU.
FiS-rtiO]
ftmcmt*.
••Mr*
r«rrlcy«l«t.
MICMr*
HWfc Oil*. f«j*j
rtrrU *r*Ml*
(kr«r>tM)
'•J«J-"«?0
Iran S»l«t«M. fti,
f.j5|
tyrltt. feSI
fotmtui im sni-
c
Obtltlc. O>«'
COttllOM UrtBMU.
tjrintH. CaOj-ujfl
IaiU>
Catult U/tt*.
CajC (M C«)
Cttttlt S»lft«M, Col.
UjSj (u 0)
Cgkalt »n4»U
s»iri*. c«*as
(aibl
CaMIt fctMl*.
WUj (M U)
Utalt C*i*a«l.
«KCO)4 (n U)
CokiltoM 0«l*.
CaO (u U)
Cot4ltMS Hrdrwldt.
Co(W)2 (11 U)
toatlm Ion, a>]
MIcUlMi. •!•'
•IcUllc. n*1
KUtlloul SuHldi.
•IS (<> HI)
Nlcktl Ar««l*,
ulAi (M M)
— — Livit 2
Mil
III
«/«>(»•>
t.l i I0>
II
X
II
II
II
II
II
1
$.0 > 10*
».0 i 10<
f.O • 10*
S.O > 10'
4.0 , Id'
S.O i 10*
1.0 I 10<
s.o i la1
s.o i t«'
S.O > ID1
i 0 i 10>
1.0 > 10
1.5 • 10'
l.S i I01
1.5 i I01
l.S > I0<
INClMtt St
mil
tf.TU
w£n
(.1 • I01
I
.1
II
II
I
•
•
•
>.s > It1
M I lOt
l.S « I0t
7 S • W>
;.i i io>
;.s i io»
7.5 I I0>
7.S I Iff2
l.S • I0>
; s > to2
;.s . to2
t.S i 10*
M > 102
? 1 « 102
Z.I > ID2
2.3 > 10*
udto of On
MTC
MTU
*/1
[caga
I
1
1
1
»
«
.1.4 • «•>
I
I
Z.S • 102
t.i • !•>
Z.S • I0>
Z.S > I0<
!.» • l»t
t.s » lot
Z.i » I0t
(.S i lot
l.t . Mt
Z.S i lot
Z.S I 10*
II
1.0 • 10*
1.0 i ID1
i.o i to'
1.0 . I0<
rf Iw ta) Mi
MTt
uwo
&l
).l » 10*
1
II
1
•
N
II
II
•
l.S • 10
l.S i 10
l.S » 10
l.S > 10
l.S > 10
l.S > 10
l.S i 10
l.S • 10
l.S > 10
l.S » 10
l.S » 10
J.O i 10-t
4.5 > 10-1
4.i > 10-1
4.5 > 1C'1
4.i • 10-'
ttrl«!«
mil
uua
cmoa
•
«
•
•
*
«
t.O » 102
I
1
S.O • 10-1
S.O i 10-1
S.O • 10-'
t.O i 10-1
S.O « 10-1
s.o • 10-1
S.O • 10-'
S.O i 10-'
S.O I 10-1
S.O > W1
S.O « IB"'
II
2.0 i 10-?
2.0 • IO-*
2.0 • 10-'
2.0 i 10-2
I
*.o.
».o.
N.D.
MHO
iwr
1.7 . 10'
itrti 2
KWIHD
T*>IS
*••)
TtST ,
WTMO1
TIST
unc-
TAIIOB2
TtSI
COS!3
Doti Not Exceed M«te
s*m.t
wigwr*
TMiE Ul
1 TfJT KTMOC
. STN
. OtKUOC-
KHM
OMCM.
. (SU
UffCTU TtSI
WttUS;
rut cost
. KASQMW.E
. maim
W»tH£ AllOUOT
MtQUUE
NUKIWl
IMMQUATC
WSAWIE
•Only i duple. S-2-3, iunwtton of acidic and baste.
.0. Not OcUUM
-------
Table 3-14. Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials (Continued)
Hiccnrr
77. runim
». com*
n. sum
ao. «OLD
SI. lit*
COWMO
McMt Oilde. NIO
(« «)
Mclel Antlwil*,
•ts» (n m )
•tciel Arteiilc Sul-
M«e. IMlS (n HI)
I1ct*1 Cartoiqrl.
M(GO)|
ElOMMal PUtllHI.,
«
Cower
Cdtron. C»*
C«*rlC. Cu»?
Corner Fluoride,
C*2 (a> Cii)
Cower 0>tde>. CuO.
bqd (11 Cv)
Cower SolflU.
CuSOl (It Cu)
C«»l i' Sxiiridn, Cu5.
c*is (is c»)
Co*»*r C«rbOMt«.
UCOj (li Cu)
IhlKlilte mwnl,
CHOI-MOO; (it C«)
Cholupyrlte
m«ent . CtfeS;
Sllwr. Ao,
Sllwr Ion. «j»
(*> A»>
Sltnr CMorf*.
AfCI (« M)
Sllwr Crmlde. AoC*
("*)>
SINer Sulflde.
AflS (« Af )
ClcvnUI Gold
Zinc. Zn
tleHntll Zinc. In
Zinc Ion. Zn»2
ZlK (hi*. ZnO
(as Zn)
mrt
•II
*/•> (w»
1.5 I l«*
1.5 « 18*
1.5 I 10*
4.1 > >«'
2.0 • 10
Z.O • 10^
Z.D « 10*
2.0 t 10?
Z.O »JOi
Z.O I I0t
2.0 • 10?.
2.0 > 10?
2.0 i 10*
2.0 • 10?
1
1.0 I I01
1.0 > 10'
1.0 • I01
1.0 « 10*
1.0 I I01
II
4.0 « Ifrl
4.0 i I0>
4.0 > 103
4.0 i 10'
mit
•ntei
^1.
2.) • 10?
2.} > I0»
Z.3 i 10»
*.S i 10?
J.O i I0<
S.O i It3
5.0 . IflT
S.O • 103
5.0 > 103
5.0 > I0>
5.0 > I03
S.O > 10)
5.0 • I0}
5.0 « 103
II
2.5 > 10?
I.) . 10?
2.5 I I02
2.5 « 10?
2.5 • 10?
II
2.5 » I04
Z.5 • 10<
Z.S > 10*
2.5 « I04
»Tt
Mm
CCOUGI
1.0 » 10*
1.0 i W1
1.0 I I01
1.0 i 10*
(a* It)
I
5.0 I 10'
5.0 • 10'
s.e i M>
5.0 • 10'
J.O i 10'
5.0 • 1C1
S.O « 10'
S.O i 1"'
S.O • H1
•
S.O l 10
S.O i 10
S.O i 10
S.O • 10
S.O > 10
II
1.0 i 10?
1.0 i IV
1.0 i 10^
1.0 i 10?
1 HlUrlal*
WTI
1MB
,3ft.
4.S i 10-'
4.S i 10-1
4.5 i 10-'
1.0 • 10
«.0 1 10-?
1.0 1 10'
1.0 • 10'
1.0 I 10*
1.0 • 10'
1 J i 10'
1.0 • 10*
1.0 1 101
1 .0 • «!'
10 • 10*
•
S.O l 10- !
5.0 i 10-'
S.O I 10-'
50 « 10-'
5.0 i 10-'
II
5.0 • Ifl1
5.0 i n'
5 0 « 10'
5.0 i I01
mic
UNO
KOUKT
Z.O » 10-?
JO i 10-?
Z,0 • 10'?
J.O « 10-'
II
1.0 « 10-'
1.0 « 10-'
1.0 1 10-'
1.0 « 10-'
1.0 I IB"'
1.0 • 10-'
1.0 « 10-'
1.0 i 10-'
1.0 > 10-'
n
1.0 l 10-1
1.0 I 10-t
1.0 « 10-'
1.0 » 10-'
1.0 I 10-'
II
2.0 « 10-1
z.o * io-'
7.0 « 10-1
J.O > 10-'
SMPIC
«"•;
(PIM)
KO/I
N.D.
1.4 > 1
N.O.
N.B.
MTIO
s«mt
Twr
?.? » 10Z
IMCl 2
HODIKO
»'TtS
•>•)
UST
•moo1
US'
ttnc-
1KIOB<
'
TUT,
COST'
Docs Not lif.rH Itote
Does Not
jicee^ "late
1
SAWtt.
W.IQUOT*
-
1.
?.
J.
4.
•Only simple 5-?-3. smtion of acidic and baste. N.O. Not Detected
FMU «':
TEST K1HOO
I. 5TMWMI
2 DEVEIOP-
NII1M.
3. wuon
A. AKS
i. no
c. KI
CHEIIICAL
0. ESCA
E. CC/MS
. I1HC1CO 1E5T
SUCCESS:
I. HIGH
t.
3.
TEST COST
I. KAJOM4U
Z. ItJOdUTE
3. HIGH
SAW1E AllQUOT
1. ADEQUATE
?. MAtCIMl
3. INUCOMTE
4. DEWVIE
-------
Table 3-14. Level 2 Leachate Studies of Overflow Bed Materials (Continued)
Uvtl 2 LucMU SUOt** »l Owrflov tad Nttertol*
• ttfEflMf
«2. CMMM
t). Nocwr
M. com
as. mmm
M. POMW
COWOUNO
IUK S«If«U. luSOj
Iwto}
2IM fail ft*, 2nS
|M I*)
b*iw. U
ItaMtUl U4iti»,
CM
C**iw !•». Cd»l
CMriw Swift*. CM
U*WI
C«*rii» fcldi. UO
(MM)
Nmnrjr. Hj
ttaMUt Hmwy. H«
Mrawwn. NKM
Nmwric. H»»
Ntrairic SulfMt,
Mf*
ftrcurlc Cklortdt.
*C12
W1**
CtrlM, C* (C«»3.
Ct«4, C«20j)
rntietfyilw, Pr
(fr»3)
SiMrlw. !• ($•»))
IwtkMW. l«
•to4y*
4.0 « ID*
1.0 I 10'
1.0 > I01
1.0 « 10<
1.0 t I0>
1.0 i 10*
i.o- i ID'
».o « to>
i.O 1 10'
i.O i lot
S.O i I0<
».o • to*
».} x 103
3.7 i 10*
S.I « 10*
S.3 i 10*
1.1 « 105
N
9.0 i 10
4.2 > 102
mn
nnr«
•clt.
IS i 10«
l.S • H>*
S.I i M>
i.O i 101
i.t t U1
i.O • I0>
i.O • 10>
1.0 i I0l
1.0 i I0>
1.0 i I0t
I.O i 10*
1.0 i U>
).• > tot
1.3 M 10*
54 < 10*
/. 7 t 10s
7.» » 10*
1.7 » 10s
I
(.0 i 10*
i.l > 103
mn
HKIU
KJZfi.
I.O • 10*
I.O * 10<
1.0 i 10
1.0 I 10
I.O • 10
I.O i 10
1.0 i 10
Z.S i 10*
1 -i i 10*
Z.S > 10*
{.1 E 10*
2.S * 102
t.i » 10*
•
N
N
N
N
N
S.O I 10*
II
mn
uua
tA.t»
S.O « 10l
S.O 1 10>
1.0 1 10-1
1.0 « 10*1
I.O « 10-1
I.O « 10-1
I.O i 10- 1
2.0 I 10-*
2.0 i 10-2
2.0 « 10-*
2.0 i 10-2
2.0 * 10-2
2.0 i 10-2
«.( « 10*
1.1 i 103
1.5 i IOJ
1.6 . 103
3.4 > Itt3
N
1.2 i 102
1.1 i 10
MK
UNO
<£&*
2.0 l 10-1
2.0 • 10-1
2.0 « 10-)
2.0 « 10-1
2.0 « If)
2.0 « 10-)
2.0 i 10-)
S.O i 10-1
S.O • 10- 1
S.O M 10-1
S.O « 10-1
S.O t 10-1
S.O « 10-1
•
N
H
N
II
II
I.O i 10
N
%
>4/1
K.O.
N.O.
D.O.
N.O.
N.D.
WHO
w
inu 2
Konio
f'«n
•HB
TBI
ICTWO1
T£ST
UKC-.
TATIONS*
-
rest
our3
SMIC.
Miquor
TMKC a*:
TEST ICTHOO
1. S1MBM0
2. otvao»-
mrTM.
3.
A. MS
I. UO
c. nn
CMUICAL
0. tSCA
C. GC/HS
tictcno IEST
SUCCESS:
1. HIGH
2. MXXMIC
). IMOOM
. TEST COST
I. MASOWBU
2. MXXMTE
3., HIGH
. SAMPLE ALIQUOT
1. ADEQUATE
2. NMKIML
3. IHADEOMTt
4. KVtfll
•Only s«|ile S-2-3, sumuUon of acidic *™J basic. N D. Not Oetfctn)
-------
Table 4-1. Results of Level 2 Survey
Analysis for Polynuclear Organic Compounds
Sample
Number
S-2-1
S-2-2
S-2-3
S-2-4
S-2-5
S-2-6
S-2-7
Compound
Identity
Naphthalene
Dimethyl naphthal ene
Phenanthrene or Anthracene
Methyl anthracene
None Detected
None Detected
None Detected
Phenanthrene
Methyl Anthracene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Benzof 1 uoranthene
Phenanthrene
Fluoranthene
1, 2 - Benzanthracene
Naphthalene
Phenanthrene or
Diphenyl acetylene
Compound
Quantity
22.9 yg/g*
49.8 yg/g*
17.4 yg/g*
22.4 yg/g*
<1.0 ug/g*
<19.9 Mg/M3
<0.2 yg/M3
117.0 yg/M3
117.0 yg/M3
117.0 yg/M3
34.7 yg/M3
19.3 yg/M3
37.6 yg/M3
89.3 yg/M3
28.2 yg/M3
15.0 yg/M3
18.0 yg/M3
* No Rate Data
1-83
-------
Table 4-3. Level 2 Survey Analysis of
Liquid Chromatographic Fractions
Sample
Identification
S-2-1
Liquid
Chromatographic
Fraction
1
Compound
Identity
16 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
17 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
18 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
19 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
20 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
Unknown
Compound
Quantity
Present <16 ug/g*
16 ug/g*
16 ug/g*
16 ug/g*
Present <16 ug/g*
190 ug/g*
S-2-3
16 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
17 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
18 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
19 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
Present <300 ug/M3
Present <300 ug/M3
Present <300 ug/M3
Present <300 ug/M3
1-8*
-------
Table 4-3. Level 2 Survey Analysis of (Cont'd)
Liquid
Sample Chroma tographic Compound
Identification Fraction Identity
20 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
Unknown
S-2-4 ' 1 16 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
17 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
18 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
19 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
20 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
Unknown
S-2-5 1 16 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
17 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
18 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
19 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
20 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
Unknown
S-2-6 1 16 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
17 Carbon
Hydrocarbon -
V8 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
19 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
20 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
Unknown
S-2-7 1 None Detected
Compound
Quantity
Present <300 yg/M3
470 yg/M3
Present <16 yg/M3
Present <16 yg/M3
Present <16 yg/M3
Present <16 yg/M3
3
Present <16 yg/M
Present <16 yg/M3
Present <20 yg/M3
20 yg/M3
Present <20 yg/M3
Present <20 yg/M3
Present <20 yg/M3
Present 20 yg/M3
Present <300 yg/M3
Present <300 yg/M3
Present <300 yg/M3
Present <300 yg/M3
Present <300 yg/M
Present <300 yg/M3
<50 yg/M3
-------
Table 4-3. Level 2 Survey Analysis of
Liquid Chromatographlc Fractions (Cont d)
Ull|UIU
Sample Chroiratographlc
THentifi ration Fraction
S-2-1 2 and 3
• v
S-2-3 2 and 3
Compound
Identity
15 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
16 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
17 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
18 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
19 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
20 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
21 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
Phthalate Ester
Unknown 2
!
15 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
16 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
17 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
18 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
19 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
20 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
21 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
Phthalate Ester
Unknown >
Compound
Quantity
Unknown 80 yg/g*
Present <6 yg/g*
Present <6 yg/g*
Present <6 yg/g*
Present <6 yg/g*
Present <6 yg/g*
Present <6 ug/g*
Present <6 yg/g*
Present <6 yg/g*
<6 yg/g*
Unknown/
Present <120 yg/M3
310 yg/M3
560 yg/M3
1,180 yg/M3
1 ,620 yg/M3
680 yg/M3
560 yg/M3
310 yg/M3
1,120 yg/M3
120 yg/M3
No Rate Data
1-8*
-------
Table 4-3. Level 2 Survey Analysis of
Liquid Chromatographic Fractions (Con't)
Liquid
Sample Chromatographic Compound .
Identification Fraction Identify
S-2-4 2 and 3
15 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
16 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
17 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
18 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
19 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
20 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
21 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
Phthalate Ester
Unknown
Compound
Quantity
Unknown 3
Present < 7 yg/M
3
Present < 7 yg/M
Present < 7 yg/M
30 yg/M3
23 yg/M3
3
Present < 7 yg/M
3
Present < 7 yg/M
3
Present < 7 yg/M
16 yg/M3
2 Present < 7 yg/M
S-2-5
2 and 3
15 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
16 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
17 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
18 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
19 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
20 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
21 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
Unknown/ 3
Present <10 yg/M
10 yg/M3
20 yg/M3
30 yg/M3
50 yg/M3
30 yg/M3
20 yg/M3
10 yg/M3
1-tt?
-------
Table 4-3. Level 2 Survey Analysis of
Liquid Chromatographic Fractions (Con't)
Liquid
Sample Chroma tographic Compound
Identification Fraction Identify
S-2-6 2 and 3
i
15 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
16 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
17 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
18 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
19 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
20 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
21 Carbon
Hydrocarbon
Ph thai ate Ester
Unknown
5-2-7 2 and 3 None Detected
S-2-1 4 and 5 Phthalate Ester
Unknown
Unknown
S-2-3 4 and 5 Phthalate Ester
Unknown
Unknown
.5-2-4 4 and 5 Phthalate Ester
Unknown
Unknown
*NO Rate Data ! *
Compound
Quantity
Unknown/
Present <120 yg/M3
Present <120 pg/M3
Present <120 pg/M3
180 pg/M3
180 pg/M3
120 pg/M3
60 pg/M3
60 yg/M3
Present <120 yg/M3
180 yg/M3
<50 yg/M3
25 yg/g*
50 yg/g*
60 yg/g*
1,120 yg/M3
870 yg/M3
1,180 yg/M3
50 yg/M3
80 yg/M3
1/2 Present <7 yg/M3
1-88
-------
Table 4-3. Level 2 Survey Analysis of
Liquid Chromatographic Fractions (Con't)
Liquid
Sample Chromatographic
Identification Fraction
S-2-5
4 and 5
Compound
Identi fy
Phthalate Ester
Unknown
Unknown
Compound
Quantity
Present <10 yg/M"1
550 yg/M;
Present <10 yg/M;
S-2-6
4 and 5 Phthalate,. Ester
Unknown
Unknown
2,120 yg/M
5,500 yg/M
Present <120 yg/M
S-2-7
4 and 5
None Detected
<50 yg/M
S-2-1
6 and 7 Propyl Phthalate
Unknown
Unknown
Phthalate Ester
Present <6 yg/g*
220 yg/g*
Present <6 yg/g*
Present <6 yg/g*
4,100 yg/M3
'"1,300 yg/M3
1,740 yg/M3
120 yg/M3
S-2-3
6 and 7 Propyl Phthalate
Unknown
Unknown
Phthalate Ester
S-2-4
6 and 7 Propyl Phthalate
Unknown
Unknown
Phthalate Ester
Present <7 yg/M
Present <7 yg/M
Present <7 yg/M
410 yg/M
,3
S-2-5
6 and 7 Propyl Phthalate
Unknown
Unknown
Phthalate Ester
Present <10 yg/M
120 yg/M
470 yg/M
620 yg/M
*No Rate Data
-------
Table 4-3. Level 2 Survey Analysis of
Liquid Chromatographlc Fractions (Con't)
Liquid
Sample Chromatographic Compound Compound
Identification Fraction Identify Quantity
S-2-6 6 and 7 Propyl Phthalate Present <120 yg/M3
Unknown Present <120 yg/M3
Unknown Present <120 yg/M3
Phthalate Ester Present <120 yg/M3
S-2-7 6 and 7 Unknown 280 yg/M3
*N6 Rate Data
1-90
-------
Table 4-4. Results of Chemical lonization GC/MS Analysis
SAMPLE ^^^^
.^"LC Fraction
S-2-1/1
S-2-1
S-2-3/2&3
S-2-3/6&7
S-2-7/6&7
MW176
X
X
X
X
COMPOUND*1
Butyl
Phthalate
X
1st Hydro-
carbon MW 332
X
2nd
Hydrocarbon
X
Phthalate
Ester
X
X
Hydrocarbon
MW 394
X
I
10
1
See text for further compound information.
-------
ADDITIONAL DATA
1*91
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-inch FBC Unit*
I - LEWI I DATA REDUCTION TABUS. «£». II.
CAIESOM
1. M.inMTIC
mmacuNK
A. AUKS AM
era ic
ALMRCS
1. ALKEKS.
crate
Alkmes ud
Dimes-
C. ALnKES
Z. MALOGERATEO
AtinATIC
HYDROCARBON
A. SATURATED
ALWL
UAL IDES
mimii
NlllMl
CjcbhHM*
lunar
HM«KM
taHMes
MttkM*
Count
CyckfctMc
AtUm (H)
Cjrc1«rc*U4ienM
CjrclohneM
Ntunet
B«U4taK!
CUyltM
Pnnrloc
Rutylocs
flaunt l
Cjclakruullrae
tegem
ACCtyleM
fetjM
Hcucklorac/clo-
teXMe (Lindone)
Nttliyl tod lite
DAK
All
rt/^d**)
J.« x 10s (100)
.OS i 10* (200)
.OS x 10* (300)
.4 I 10* (MO)
.45 i 10* (300)
.6 > 10* (400)
.8 t 10* (MO)
.3 x 10t (MOO)
.12 > 10* (MOO)
.0 x 10* (6000)
II
N
,2,0 * 10* (75)
1.0 x 10* (MO)
1.02 x lot (100)
2.2 « ID6 (1000)
S.71 x 10* (MOO)
8.69 x 10* (MOO)
II
N
N
H '
1.65 x 10* (1000)
5.31 x 10* (5000)
*
S.O x 10?
8.54 i Id2
mu
MATE!
•VI
MM. TO
S.4 i IB*
I.S7 x 10'
1.St x 10*
Z.I > It7
2. 1* x 10?
2.4 i W'
2.7 x 187
4.»l x W
».13 i ID7
1.3& i 10>
*
•
3.4 I 10*
I.S i 107
1.53 i IB7
1.3 x 10'
».57 x 107
1 W x 10>
II
II
1
* _l
2.40 I Id'
7.97 I 10'
II
7.50 » )0>
1.28 > 104
WT£
HATER
»f/l
ECOIOGT
1.0 x 10s
II
1.0 » IflJ
.1.0 i 10*
II
1.0 i 10*
1.0 x 103
»1.0 x 10*
1
>1.0 x 10*
>1.0 x 10*
1
N
II
N
1.0 x to3
1.0 x 10*
1.0 I 10*
II
N
N
1.0 < 10*
N
N
N
1.0 x 102
N
NATE
urn
H£'T.
1.1 i W*
3.2 i IB*
3.2 x 10*
4.2 > M*
4.4 i 10*
4.S I 10*
S.4 i 10*
».« I 10*
1.4 i 10*
2.1 I 10*
1.1 i 10*
1
t.O x 10*
3.0 I 10*
1
t.6 i 10*
1.7 x l«*
2.* I 10*
II
I
I
II
i.O x 10*
l.« I 10*
1
I.S t 1C1
2.6 < id1
NATE
LAM
ECOLOCr
>t.O 1 ID1
•
2.0
>2.0 x 10?
•
2.0 i 10?
2.0
>2.0 x 10*
N
>2.0 x ID2
>2.0 i 10*
N
N
II
II
2.0
2.0 > 10
2.0 x 102
II
N
*.._..
N
II
N
2.0 x 10-'
N
WHIM FOUND
III
UVEL 1
GAS. FIELD. C*
SASS. LAB, C9
CAS. FIELD. Ci
CAS. FIELD. C*
SASS. LAS. a
SASS. LAB. C7
CAS. FIELD. CS
«AS. FIELD. CI
GAS. FIELD. C2
GAS. FIELD. C3
CAS. flELO. CS
SASS. LAB. CI0-
12. LCI
GAS. FIELD. CS
GAS. FIELD. Ci
GAS. FIELD, C6
GAS. FICLD. C3
GAS, FIELD. CI
GAS. FIELD, a
GAS. FIELD. C3
GAS, HELD. CS
GAS, FIELD, CS
GASjJlELDj.tt.
GAS, FIELD, C3
GAS. FIELD. C2
GAS. FIELD, C3
SASS. -AB, Cll
GAS, FIELD, CS
&
*/\
• 8.
1.0.
1.0.
«.».
1.0.
R.O.
«.D.
».o.
».D.
N.D.
H.D.
/.falO2
.0.
.0.
.0.
.0.
.0.
.0.
.0.
.0.
.D.
£-
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
CATECMT
1. MBOTUKD
/men.
miiiEs
i. imus
conuio
trttmcUMiw
ttrucklerocUian*
I.M'IrtcMwv*
fUMC
CH*M Utra-
cfctorl*
MJ*I kiwl 10* (75)
7.2 > 10s (zoo)
1.1 I 10* (700)
4.« > 10* (lOW I
4.W « 10* (1000)
S.» « 10*
M
•
II
N :'
I.I > Ml7 (0.01)
2.S» i to* (It
4.0 I I01
i.it > to*
t.M • M1
1.7 • n* (ioa)
r.o « to* (woi
I.» « 10*
l.i * l«* (M)
I.I l 10*
1. OS a to* («0)
N
mn
wnx
^/\
NCALTH
>.* i 10*
1.5 * 10*
».» x 10*
l.«7 » 10*
.0 10*
.0 10*
.0 10*
.15 10*
.IS 10*
1.08 10*
1.7 10*
7.4] » 10'
;.«j i 10'
•.4 | 10*
«
*
*
• • •
i.ts » to3
l.M • 10*
«.or > 10*
l.M « 10*
I.M • 10*
I.Vt * 10'
1.10 l M>
J.» * 10*
2.7 • 10*
2.7 « 10*
1.SS > 10'
N
mu
(MICH
•Vi
ECOIOCT
R
N
1.0 i 10>
t.O i 103
>1.0 i to*
It
1.0 i 10*
>1.0 i 10*
1.0 i I0>
4.5 « 10)
' II
II
>I.O « 10*
N
II
N
II
N
•
>)1 .0 » 10*
II
1.0 > 10*
«.i • I0>
1.0 it 10)
1.0 * 10*
*
•
1.0 < 10*
t.O > 10*
N
MOTE
UMO
•9/9
HUITH
1.5 » 10?
3.0 > 10?
1.4 i 10*
1.S » 10)
1.1 > 10)
1.Z » 10)
(.0 » 10*
(.4 » 10)
I.I • 10*
1.4 « 10*
1 .S • 10*
1.5 > 10*
1.7 • 10*
R
•
*
«
J.4
7.» it 10<
l.f i W*
1.4 I 10?
2.01 tO*
2.2 • 10*
i.S « 10*
1.4 * ID)
5.4 i 10>
1.2 i 10*
R
mic
IMO
•9/9
tCOLOGT
II
II
2.0
2.0
.72.0 I 10?
II
Z.O 1 10'
2.0 • 10?
2.0
II
1
72.0 « 10?
II
II
II
*
M
•
f .0 m 10?
II
1.0
2.0
2.0 * I0<
D
f .0 i tOt
2.0 I 10'
2.0 I 10*
"
UNCIK (CUB
III
uni i
S4SS. IM. d«
5AS5. U». Cll
cu, ntu, o
ws. riao. cs
MS, FKlt, C4
6*s, ntu. a
CAS, run. o
CAS. HUB. a
«$. run. a
SASS, u». a
GAS. ficu. a
CAS. ncu, cs
CAS. rittt. a
CAS. FIEU. C4
CAS. ntu. a
eu. not. a
SMS, IM, fl
SASS. US. Cll
SASS. US. Ut
«AS. ncu. a
SASS. ut. 10
ws. MIU. a
«s. ntu. e»
SASS. uf. a
GAS. na». cs
SASS. ut. a
SASS, Ut. C7
SASS. U», C7
SASS. Ut. C7
SAX5. U*. C7
s«mr
.4/*1
«vl
xt/1
».o.
».D.
1.0.
I.I.
l.l.
•.D.
R.l.
».».
•.1.
«.e.
•.t.
*.i.
1.1.
».i.
1.0.
1.1.
l.f.
y*.-
7.«.M<
i.i.
r.4,10*
1.1.
Li.
LB. T
I.I.
1.0.
1.1.
I.S.
1.0.
1.0.
BAT 10
wnt
H«It
1.7
(.1
irni ?
KQUIRtO
Y-TE5
I'M
tei
»«
TEST
NI1M01
l-C
l-C
tEST
t«PEC-
T At IOHS'
1
1
TEST
COST)
1
1
vwvt,
Al!7«r'
I
1
TAKE UT:
TEST KTHOO
I. STANDARD
?. renior-
WNTAl
3. imam
A. AAS
1. «RD
C. WET
CTIHItAl
0. ESCA
E. CC/NS
(VtCTEB
TtST SUCCESS:
i. Him
I. NXKBATE
3. (MUOm
TtST COST
1. MASOB-
Mlt
2. IOOCMTE
1. HIGH
swnc
AtlOUOT
1. MtOUATI
2. MMCINAt
ll IMOCQUATE
4. KSAITU
•tin *f S-2-S. S-2-4. Mri S-2-7.
I.I. Hot Ditnvliwl
N to «•!•
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-inch FBC Unit* (Continued)
UTtOKf
«. WlOtaUtt
ETHEJB
S. ALCOHOLS
A. PUMUT
N.UMU
t. SCOMMT
M.COUOU
1.t-Ml»l*rM<-
•dyl ctttfr
1.2-MdiUA-
•ttpl ttfctr
I^-Mckl«rWt-
•tiyl tiktr
CklwwKtkrl
•MM *tl*r
1.1-Mdil«*-
«Uyl rtktr
2-Cklara-l.2
C*MWO»W
2-Cklctttttkyl
•Uqpl clkcr
l-tkUr»-l.2-
WCtMC
atonvlkyltU*)
•Ucr
1.2-HUIoncttrl
ettjl ctfecr
.-CklonlMtrl-
tUyl ttkcr
M*-O-Cftl«n«i*-
H»»l) «»er
Sraofkoyl
pkr*?l tifeer
*-*r**iyti»lrtM
IwMyUlotal
FcvtMll (PrtaMy)
1-tafiMQl
taUwli (frtary)
•-•vtMol
NKItMol
EttMal
rkaqrl EtkMol
_lauyl
tem«l
2.fr-Olwtkyl-4-
kcpUiul
«IC
Ml
*fl(tf}
!.• • 10* (S)
3.S i It4 (5)
).• • ID4 (S)
3.M I ID4
*
•
I
•
M
II
N
I
II
5.S x I 10s
4.5 i 10s
4.5" « 10s
S.S2 * 10*
II
«
•
N
N
N
N
N
N
8.3 x 10$
2.3 x 10*
5.4 » 106
7.S x 10*
2.25 x 10*
3.9 » 10*
2.85 x 107
2.7 x 10*
8.31 < 10*
1.35 x 10*
2.4 « 10*
mil
tMTfl
•4/1
[COLMT
1
4.i i 10>
1.0 i ID4
4.5 i 193
II
*
1
1
I
•
N
II
X
1.0 i 104
1 .0 i IS4
1 .0 x 10*
1.0 i I04
>1.0 «.10*
>1.0 > 10s
>1.0 I 10s
II
1.0 » I04
ft
n
MATC
UW
«4/9
HHITH
1.0 i 102
I
>.0 « 102
1.1 « 10J
II
N
M
II
•
N
N
II
II
i . ; x io3
«.i i 103
1.1 > 104
l.S x ID4
4.4 > 103
7.8 i I03
S.8 x 104
5.4 i \02
4.8 < ID1
4.8 x 10*
HMt
UM
H/S
Ecaooi
II
II
2.0 x W>
4.0
1
II
«
II
II
II
II
1
I
2.0 « 1C1
2.0 i I01
2.0 < 10*
2.0 i 10'
2.0 i I02
2.0 i 102
2.0 i 10*
II
N
ft
IMCU FOUND
IN
UKl 1
SAM. IM. C7
SASS, IM, C9
SASi. LM. CIO
GAS, FlflD. C5
SASS. IM, C7
SASS. l«, LC4
GAS. fllLD. C6
SASS. US. C7
SASS. LAi. C7
SASS. IAS. C9
SASS. LAB. CIO
SASS. LAB. Cll
SASS. LAB. LC4
SASS. LAB, C12
SASS, LAB. C7
SASS. LAB. C8
(AS. MELD, C6
SASS. LAS. C8
GAS, flHD. C6
GAS, FIELD. C6
SASS. LAS, LC6
SASS. LAB, IC6
SASS. LAB, LC6
SASS. LAB, C6
%?
(PP-)
»«/)
R.O.
N.O.
1.0.
x.o.
H.O.
4X102
N.O.
N.O.
II. 0.
N.D.
N.O.
N.D.
4xlOZ
N.D.
N.O.
N.O.
N.O.
N.O.
N.O.
N.O.
3.6x10?
3.6X102
3.6X102
N.O.
MHO
^
M
N
0.02
LCHL 2
UQUIUO
T-ItS
N*M
NO
1
list
WTHOO'
TEST
tmc-
TATIONS?
ftST
COS!3
SAIPLC.
AllflUOT4
TABLE «t:
I. TEST KTMOB
2! KVtlW-
MUTM.
3. utaam
A. AAS
i. no
C. NET
OiUICM.
0. ESCA
f. GC/KS
2. HPECTIO
ICSI SUCOSS:
1. HIGH
2. MMXRMC
3. UKMM
3. USl COST
1. REASON
ABIC
2. MOOCMir .
3. H1CH
4. SAMPtt
MIQUOI
1. AOtqiMIC
2. HAWIKM
3. INAKQUAIE
4. RtSAMPlE
itl
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch BBC Unit* (Continued)
UTfeMN
C. URMAjn
MCWOU
*. CUtOLS.
EFOIIKS
A. SIKOLS
i. tratiDU
;. M.KOTBES.
miNtS
A. NLHMTKS
B. KETORES
CONFWM
FMtmols
(«COT*nr>
2-fcrtM.l
t-PraiMMl
Ttrtfiiy rxttMol
«->«r»»iK»l
T*rtl«y B*tM»l
iMtomwl
EUtgrtmc flyeol
Fnvylnejljrcol
l-Oilw»-2,3-
»l»ii.Hinnmn
2.3-Epoiy-l-
prapml
Acroltln
r«ra*Mrlrrd(
PretlMlfeliy*
BnuMety*
wrtyr< 1 flcnyoc
AcvtftlpMjrvv
3-R*ttriwtMi
tavtar
li»+nvm
MBTUflMHMC
Ac* taw
teUMM
Tctncklcro-
Ketane
Cftlmkramv
, S.t-lMio-9-
( fatlvm
01h7dro(d)c«rron*
RATE
IIR
•I/-3 (n»)
l.( • 10* (100)
4.1 i ID5 (ISO)
».S « W* (400)
4.5 » 10*"
1.1* I 10s
J.O i 10* (100)
*
1.0 > 10*
3.* i W* (100)
l.*3 • I04
1.* • 10* (SO)
Z.S i 10? (0.1)
I.C I I03
J.i l 10*
s.n « to4
1.17 i ID5
l.f > 10* (100)
l.H • 10s
I.I I 10* (?)
2.5 x 10*
4.M i 10*
Z.4 « 10*' (1000)
S.1 i 10* (200)
1
•
II
*
MT(
wn*
MtMTM
S.4 I 10*
t.TS I 10*
1.47 « 10'
S.7S i 1*0%
2.B9 1 10*
4.S • 10*
*
i.s i to*
5.4 > 10*
J.45 J 10s
Z.3 » 10s
3.n « lo3
!.« « »0*
i.4 • I0>
•.77 i 105
1.141 i 10*
J.7 i 10*
S.7» • Id6
1.1 i 1C?
3.7S > 10s
1.07 x 10s
3.« x 107
B.W i 106
N
II
II
II
mn
WWt»
.«/)
EC0106T
II
.1.0 i 10*
1.0 i 10*
>I.O i 10s
N
.1.0 > 10*
M
1.0 i 10*
>I.O i 10*
1.0 i 103
»
.1.0 i 10*
1.0 K 10*
1.0 . 10*
II
1.0 i 10*
II
i.o i to3
II
II
II
-1.0 * 10*
»1.0 i 10*
II
II
N
H
H4U
lANO
"9/9
MCM1H
1.1 « 10*
1.4 « 10*
1.0 > 10*
1.4 » tof
5.8 « I0>
9.0 » lfr>
II
3.0 • 10?
1.1 i 10*
4.8 > 10*
S.2 > to1
7.5
«.8 i I0>
1.1 « 10)
I.S » 10*
3.3 > 10*
5.4 i IflT
1.J » 10*
3.6 I 10*"
7.5 > 10?
1.2 < 10'
7.2 x 10*
1.8 « tO4
N
N
N
N
HATE
UMO
ECOLOGY
II
Z.O K Itf
2.0 > 10
2.0 * }f
N
2.0 I 10?
1
2.0 • I01
2.0 i 102
2.0
II
2.0 i 10-'
2.0
2.0 > 10
R
2.0 » 10"'
N
2.0
II
•
N
>2.0 I 10*
>2.0 > 10?
N
II
R
N
wen rowD
i*
urn i
SAM, LA*. C8
GAS. flElO. Ct
CAS. ricio. «
CAS. FIELD. Ct
SASS. LAB, IC6
SASS. LAI, LC6
SASS. LAI. Cll
SASS. LM. Cll
SASS. LM, a
SASS. LAI, CIO
MS, FIUO. C5
CAS. FIELD, C3
GAS. FULO. C5
SASS. LAI, CIO
CAS, FIELD. U
GAS, FIELD. C4
CAS, fULO. U
SASS. UW. LC4
SASS. LAB, LC4
SASS. LM. IC4
GAS. FIELD, CS
GAS, nao. cs
SASS. LAf, Cll
SASS. LAt. LC4
SASS. LAS, LC4
SASS. LM. LC4
y?
TFO-)
.9/1
d.O.
M.O.
».o.
R.O.
3.M102
R.O.
J.Mtf
R.O.
R.O.
R.O.
R.O.
. .
. .
t .
. .
4.1x10?
4,Ix!Ot
4.1x10*
R.O.
R.D.
R.O.
4.U102
4.1x10*
4.U102
UTIO
y«I
mrs
0.002
i
0.834
1
1
1
LE«l Z
REOUIRED
T-tES
N>RO
M>
•0
NO
HO
TEST ,
HCTHOD1
TEST
EIMC-
TATIONS?
nsT.
COST*
SAMFtE.
ALIQUOr
TABLE OT:
1EST KTHOD
1. STAROWD
2.
3.
A. AAS
i. in
C. KET
CHEMCAL
0. ESCA
c. cc/re
EmCTEO
TEST SUCt2SS:
2'. RD0ERATE
3. aaam
. TEST COST
t. feCASOT-
ABU
2. lawn
3. RICH
. SAFVLE
Miguot
i. AOEOWIE
2. RARCIMt
3. IRADEQMTT
4.
itlon of S-Z-5. S-2-« tut S-Z-7
R.O. Rot
R Ro'taliK
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-Inch FBC Unit* (Continued)
amsaa
a. cMMmic *cias
«. CMMmiC
AOK
». uauinic
at as win
MMTIOW.
FMCIIOMM.
taws
t. MUR
( fSIEK
$. (rnuus
COHKMNO
Mltlc
mtullc
Fvralc
Antic
touolc
lo*9 Out*
l-HytfnnjrprapMoic
Ac 14 UttM*
B-FToptolKlm
Kjrdreijteiuolc Acid
Hydroxyuctlc Acid
t-MmMluLW
FaraMl*
AcclMlde
6-felnoteunalc
AcU
FktluUtes
Hetkjrt Hetlucry-
l*tt
AdtHtcs
Methyl etnlMU
Phenyl Bnuutt
Dt-2-«ttjllwijtl
pfeUiUU
lout ckitu *»Urs
1-CjroactlMii*
TetrMttftyl-
MKCliwaitrllc
*utyro«Urile
•aunitrllc
AcrylMltrllf
Antonitrllc
Rtpkthmltrilts
MATE
At*
*•/•>(*»>
i.o i to3 (o.2S)
i.O > ID1 (l-.O)
(.0 I 10* (S.O)
2.S l ID4 (10)
1.4 i 10s
II
1.1? I I02
J.2 i 10*
4.01 > 10*
6.78 > 10*
1.0 • I03
1.0 i ID4 (20)
4.5 I 10s
2.11 » 10*
i.O » 10'
4.1 . « 10* (100)
l.» l 10*
1.S » 104
N
N
II
1.7* x I01
1.0 I 1C3 (0.5)
?.2b » 10*
3.24 > 104
4.i > 104 (20)
7.0 > 104 (40)
N
rnic
WTU
>9/l
HEALTH
l.S i 10*
9.0 i 10*
1.4 l 10s
3.8 i 1C*
2.1 > 10*
1
4.7( I I01
.t I 10*
.01 > lift
.11 » 10*
.& < 10*
,S , 10*
.7i i ID1
3.S l !«'
7.5 i I04
6.2 > 10*
2. S3 i 10s
2.2S • 10*
«
N
1
Z.M > 10*
4.S I 10*
1.37 i 10s
4.86 > 10s
6.8 > 16s
l.OS i 10*
II
HUE
Mill
*n
atufi
•
•
»
i.* • xP
*
i
14 I Id4
•
1
•
I
1
I
I
l.S
1 « 4 Id4
1
X
•
I
1
»
1
II
I
l.d i 101
18 i 10s
I
HATE
LAM)
•9/9
HCM.TH
3.0 « I0>
I.I I JO*
2./ > 10*
7.6 « 10*
4.2 « 10)
H
9.6
1.2
1 .2 x tO1
2.6 > 103
1.0
».0 i 102
1.4 x 10*
R
l.S i 102
1.2 i 10*
S.6 I 10*
4.6 x 101
N
H
H
S.4 i 10
S.O i 10
6.8 > 102
1.4 > U>3
1.4 * 10}
2.1 > 103
N
miE
LAND
*«/4
Ecaoo
H
R
N
2.0
H
II
2.0 < ,10
R
N
H •
R
R
R
II
1.0 > 10-3
2.0 x 10
R
R
II
R
R
R
N
2.0
2.0 > 102
R
WEtf FOM)
IR
LEVEL 1
SASS. US. U
SASS. LAB.
LCI t8
SASS, LAB. C8
SASS. UB.
LC7 t 8
SASS. LA8. C8.
8 1 LC7
SASS. LA8. C8.
8 t LC7
SASS. LAB. CIO
SASS. LAB. C7
SASS. LAB. LC7
SASS. LAB. C7
SASS. LAB. 1C 7
SASS. LA8. LC7
SASS. LAB. LCfl
SASS. LAB. 1C*
SASS. LAB, C7
SASS. LAB. C8.
» 1 10
SASS. LAB, CIO
SASS. 1AB. LC6
SASS. LAB. LC«
SASS. LAB. LC6
r
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
CATEGORY :
M. mums
A. fmwtf
1. SKflMUf
c. rontART
AJQKS
II. A20
CONPOMDS
<
COMPOUND
l-MxwpMilene
ffetkylMlfi*
4-IM*tktpttt IB* (i)
I.I I 10* (10)
t.f i 10* (10)
4.0 X 10* (10)
1.17 x 10*
8
1.1J x ii?
t.« x 10* (10)
7.0 X 10* (20)
7.S X M* (25)
8
1.1 x Jo*
1.7 x M*
2.18 x 10*
(.0 t 10* (0.1)
1.1 I 10*
4.S i I03
8.8 x 103
1.4 x 10*
1.* X 10* (1)
2.S x W* (S)
2.1 x 10* (S)
1.17 • 10
I.S x 10* (0,2)
4.0 x 10* (0.2)
1.81 • 103 (0.5)
1.3S i 10*
1.4 i 10*
*
mn
MATER
•4/1
RULTfl
8.S i I03
2.77 x 10*
1.8 x 10*
*.0 < 10*
2.2S I 10*
2.7 I 10s
1.7S I 10s
1.0 x 10*
•l.f x 10*
R
S.8 I 103
2.7 X 10s
l.OS i 10*
l.tl X 10*
• J
1.7 x W3
Z.I x 103
1.27 x I03
».S x 103
2.0 X 10*
i . » x 10*
*.« > 10*
Z.I * 10*
2.8S i 10*
1.7S x 10*
1.83 x 10*
4.78 x 10*
J.2S X I03
(.0 x I03
1.5 > 104
2.02 > 10*
2.0 x I05
R
PATE
HAKI
tCOlOCT
1.0 x 10*
R
.0 > 103
.0 x 10*
> .0 I W*
.0 x 103
.0 * I03
i.o x ra*
...R .. ,.
1
1.0 x 193
1.0 x 10*
1.0 X W3
R
N
t.O x 10*
R
R
R
R
R
1.0 I 10*
1.0 I 10^
R
R
N
R
R
N
N
R
R
MATE
LARD
3.6 i 10
1.8 x 10*
4.S x 10*
5.4 x 10*
7.8 x 10*
I.Z I UP
1.8 * I03
R __
t.O x to
S.4 i 10*
2.1 x 103
2.2 x 103
t
3.0
S.O
6.0
I.S x 10
4.0
1.4 x I03
2,0 x 10*
4.2 I 10*
8.0 i 10*
7.S I 10^
7.S I 10*
1.0
1.1 X 10
1.2 > 10
1.8- ».M
4.0 < 10*
NATE
LARD
ECOLOCT
2.0
2.0 x 10
2.0 x 10*
2.0
2.0
Z.O x 10
R
_ JL _
z.o
2.0 x 10
2.0
R
R
Z.O x 10-1
R
R
R
R
R
2.0 x to*1
2.0
H
R
R
R
R
II
" - .
R
WERE rOURO
IR
LEVEL 1
SASS, LA8, LC7
SASS. LAI. Ltt
CAS. Fiao. c*
SASS. U8. CM
CAS. FIEL8, a
GAS. FIEU. C4
SASS. LA8. d
SASS. LAS. O
SASS. LA8. 0
GAS FIEU. CS
CAS, FltlB. dT
CAS. FIEU. OT
SASS. IA8, tat
CAS, FIEU, CI7
GAS, FIOO, Mt
SASS. Ul. Clt
SASS, IA8. tC8
SASS. U8. IO
SASS. 1A8. 10
SASS. LA8. IC8
SASS. LMKIC*
SASS. LAI. IC7
SASS. Um. U7
SASS, LM, Cll
SASS. LA8. Cll
SASS, LM. U»
CAS, FIUO, a
GAS. FIEU. CS
CAS, FIEU. O
SASS. LM, C8
C0/FK10. Ct
SASS. 1M. IC7
SAS5. LM, 08
S
8.2x10*
l.tolO2
1.0.
R.I.
I.I.
1.1.
R.O.
1.0.
8,0,
1 1
8.8.
1,1.
UtaigL
8-0.
1.8.
R.8.
1.8.H2
8.2x10*
1.8x10*
1.8mlB*
J.M10*
8.2x10*
8.2x10*
LI.
I.D.
J.falO*
H.O.
R.P.
I.I.
R.O.
R.D.
9.2x10*
R.D.
RATIO
I.S
0.1*
-JBJ&
Z.I
1.8
0.7
0.001
urn *
REQUIRED
T-US
R-RO
TtS
RO
n
to
TO
ra.
80
Tin
KTROO'
I-C
,
I-C
14
1-1
TEST
EXKC-
TATIORS*
I
1
1
1
TEST
COST3
1
1
I
1
ALiquor
i
i
i
i
TAME KEY:
TEST ICTWB
1. STMOWD
2. DEVELW-
mTAL
1. IMKMOUR
A. AAS
8. «
c. vcr
CKMCAl
>. ISU
f. cc/m
annto
TEST SUCCESS:
1. HIGH
2. PDOEMTE
i. IMMUR
TEST COST
f. KASONWLC
Z. NWCMTt
1. RICH
, SANU
AtlOUOT
1. A8CQWTC
Z. RMKIMM.
1. IWK4UATE
4. »VU»Vf
ItlOT Of S-2-5, S-Z-C «nd S-2-7
R.D. Rot DctenrtMi)
R No V«tw
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-inch FBC Unit* (Continued)
CATEOMt
12. NITWSAMES
U. HERCAPTAHS.
SULFIOES
A. MCRCAMANS
B. SULFIDES
OISULFIOU
M. SW.FONIC ACIDS,
SULFOUMS
A. SU.FONIC
ACIDS
B. SUlfOXIOES
COMPOUND
KUroso-
DtaethylMtM
•-Nttmo-
BlethylMln*
N-*ltiyl-N-
Mtmo-taUiM
•-•Unup-DI-
pronrlilae
mitroso-Oi-
H*«yl»lM
N-NUroso-Oilso-
propylMine
N-NUroso-01-
ptntylwiiiM:
Perchlorooelhyl
MerupUn
Methyl MerctpUn
Ethyl Mcrctptw
tutyl Herciptlfli
Bententlitol
Propyl HercipUm
l-Anthranlhtol
Dlntthyl Sulfldt
fhrnyl Sulfide
Dltthyl Sulfide
Ifethyl Dlsulfidt
ftciuensulfonlc
Acid
9.10-Anthriqui-
noM'Dlsulfonlc
Acid
Ofaethyl Sulfo»1d«
*•::
«i»
>»/•» !*».•
t.i
1.21 < l>2
1.2* i 1CJ
2.41 i I'll
7.4 < W4
3.83 « IJ4
I
8.0 j i.J* (0.1)
1.0 « I*1 JP.Si
1.0 < I*2 (0.5)
1.5 i 1»3 10.5)
2.07 i \0f
8.06 » IS4
•
J.41 i i9<
«.»3 t ID4
1
*
4.01 i la4
*
8.14 . \0*
rniE
UATEK
HEATH
1.8 i 10
1.82 x 103
l.M i 104
3.M < 10*
1.1 x 10*
5.75 « 10'
N
1.2 » I04
1.5 « 10*
1.5 > 10*
2.25 » 10*
3.10 i 104
1.21 i 10*
N
3.61 s 10t>
1.44 » 1C*
N
II
6.01 X 1(A
N
1.22 l I03
HATE
MATER
»•/!
ECOLOGY
N
N
*
N
N
II
II
N
N
N
II
n
*
*
N
K
*
II
N
II
N
MTC
LAND
HEALTH
3.6 x 10-2
3.6
3.8 * 10
1.2 > 10
2.2 « 103
1.2 « )0>
N
2.4 i 10
3.0 x 10
3.0 i 10
4.5 x 10
6.2 x 10
2.4 x 103
N
7.2 > 10?
2.9
N
N
1.2 x 103
N
2.4
WTE
LAM)
>4/9
ECOLOGY
II
*
i
II
N
II
X
II
N
N
N
II
N
II
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
*tm FOMO
II
um i
SASS. LAt, C9
SASS. LAI. CIO
SASS. LAI, LCS
SASS. LM. C12
1 LCS
SASS. LAC. LCS
SASS. LAI. Cll
SASS. LAI. LCS
SASS. LM. LC6
GAS. TIUO. SGC
US. FIELD. SCC
GAS. FlUtt, SCC
SASS. LAI. LU
MS. FIUO, SGC
SASS. L«, LC6
CAS. FltlO. SGC
SASS. LAB. C9
1 US
GAS. FIELD. SCC
SASS. LM, CB
SASS. LM. LC8
SASS. LM. LC8
SASS, LA8, Cll
SAMPLE
VQ/O3
(H»)
i.9/1
K.D.
tt.O.
2.4xl02
2.4X102
2.4U02
N.D.
Z.talO2
3.6X102
N.O.
«.o.
K.O.
3.6I102
H.O,
3.6x102
1.0.
2.4xlOZ
H.O.
N.O.
7.6ilO
7.6x10
N.O.
DAI 10
JAMHE
HATE
0.18
0.45
0.002
LEVEL 2
WQUIIIU)
T-»ES
N-NO
NO
tES
NO
TEST .
METHOD1
1-E
TESt
EIPIC-
TATIOHS2
1
TEST
COST3
1
SAWLE
ALIQUOT*
1
TABLE KEY.
1. TEST METHOD
1. &TANOAK)
2. DEVELOP-
MENTAL
3. UNKNOMH
A. AAS
8. «RO
C. MT
CHEMICAL
0. ESCA
E. GC/MS
2. EXPECTED
TEST SUCCESS:
I. HIGH
2. MOOEKATE
3. IMKNOUH
3. TEST COST
I. REASON-
ABLE
2. MOOFHAU
3. HIGH
4. SAMPLE
ALIQUOT
1. AOCQilAH
2. MARGINAL
3. INADEQUATE
4. RESAMPtt
Smtlon of S-Z-S, $-2-6 *m* S-2-7
N.D. tot 0>t«nitn«d
II Nc «i)u«
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
§
CAUQOn
is. tcntK.
SUBSTITUTED
ItWtHf
1* HALOKNATEP
AROMATIC
mDMXMBOK
A. DIN
SMSTITWD
!
awraiM)
Upton?)
Icnine
1«rj*Bt»li
Intent
Itovropjrl ttnicm
Trtartk/1 teruene*
OlMwMpdthj-
1«l«» '
Ktrtkjrdrv-
MtMlttlCMl
frapjrl tenttne
IHttkyt Soiune
tutjrl tenltnt
ttidme
.T*tt*nr
Stjmnt
tthjl Bcnicn*
lylcnci
4,41-Otptxtiyl-
blphrnyl
Telrwxtdjrl
: Bflyrnfj
tolyclilorfruteri
fctpftenyli
ColychtorirwleJ
teiutnes
Oilorwwplithalnifi
2-CMoroto)wiw
1,2-Oictlloro-
tuntnt
Chlorob«iuene
1.4-OlcMoro-
bt ftJFPfW?
• wit
MR
•*/•* ((*»)
1.0 « 1C3 (0.2)
1.0 > I0> (10)
9.0 * 101 (1)
4.S « 10* (10)
*.J « 1C*
I.I « 10* (75)
1.27 « 10s
1.29 « 10s
2.17 « 10*
2.25 » tO*
2.25 > 10*
2.3 » 10*
I.n « 10s (100)
4.2 > 10* (100)
4.15 > 10* (100)
4,35 « to* (109)
II
II
5.7 > to?
3.4 « 104
6.93 » I04
2.5 I 10* (SO)
3.0 * 105 (Ml
3.5 « 10s (»)
4.75 > 10s (75)
MIC
mm
•«/!
HUtTH
1.5 « 104
4.5 • 10*
1.3S « 10s
• .8 « tO*
9.45 i 105
l.t I 10*
..l.fl « 106
1,94 > 10*
3.25 i 10*
3.38 » 10*
3.38 i 106
3.4 i 10*
S.tl • 10*
6.3 » 10*
6.51 > 10*
6.53 > 10*
H
» •
7.5 > I03
5.1 * 1fl5
1.04 i )06
3.75 t 10«
4.5 i 10*
5.7.5 « 10*
6.8 > ID6
MATE
WTtt
.9/1
tCOtOCT
II
1.0 > 10}
«
i.o » 10}
4.5 « 10?
II
1.0 > 103
1.0 » 10'
1.0 * 103
t.O > 1*3
II
II
1.0 I 10)
1.0 • 10>
1.0 « 10*
1,0 « 10'
II
1.0 i 1S»
5.0 » 10-1
1.0 i 10*
N
II
t.O « 10?
1.0 > 10?
1.0 x 10?
mil
LAW
1/1
HCM.TM
3.0 i 10
4.0 > 10
2.1 i 10?
1.4
1.9 « 103
3.6 i ID1
4.0 i 10*
4.0 i 103
6.6 i 10*
6.1 > 10*
(.« « 10'
1.8 > loJ
1.1 » 10*
1.3 » 10*
1.3 > 10*
1.3 i 10*
II
N
1.0 I I0}
1.5 > 10
7.5 « I05
».0 < Ifr1
1.1 > 10*
1.4 > 104
IH1[
UNO
•9/9
ECOLOGY
N
2.0
R
H
2.0
N
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
N
II
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
II
2.0 i 10
2.0 « 10-'
1.0 » 10-5
N
2.0 « 10-'
2.0 » 10-1
2.0 « 10-'
M4CK FOUND
IN
irm i
SASS, LW, IC2
us. mm. a
SAS5, US. LO
SASS, LM, LC3
SASS. LM, C9
SASS, Ltt, CIO
SASS, Itt, IC2
SASS, LM, CU.
LC7
SASS, LM, 0
SASS. LM, CIO.
II, 12
SASS. LM. Cll
SASS. IM, LC2
SASS. LM, d
SASS. LM, C9
SASS. LM. C8
SASS, LM, n
SASS. LM, LC2
1 1
SASS. LM. Cll
SASS. LM. 10
1 1
SASS, LM, Ltt
• 1
SASS. LM, LC2
( 1
SASS. kM. 0
SASS. IM. CIO
SASS, LM, CS
SASS, LM, Cll)
vm'
*>J
<«»)
V9/I
7.4.I02
i.O.
5.1lIOJ
5.UIO*
».o.
11,0.
7.4110*
7.4U02
N.D.
ft.D.
R.l.
T t,flf
d.D.
R.D.
«.o.
0.0.
l.3ilf
*.t.
i.imo1
1.3J105
!.1«10J
d.O.
».o.
N.D.
M.O.
MHO
SAIffLi
wrt
0.73
0.0*
II
2.6
LETtl 2
BfQUIKB
T-TtS
••«
rts
K>
rn
TEST
•moo1
i-e
i
l-E
t
TEST
£XK£-
IMIOtlS?
1
1
ttST
COST!
i
i
Vfn.i
ALigUJT*
i
i
i.
2
J.
4.
TMLC «»:
TEST ICTMOO:
1. STMOWO
2. antio*-
NCNTAL
3. UKUWWK
A. MS
8. X»0
C. «1
CHEMICAL
0. ESCA
E. CC/W
EXPECTED ItSI
SUCCESS:
1. HIGH
2. fOOEMTE
3. UMtKMT
. TEST COST
1. tEASOM-
MLE
2. MXXMTE
3. KICK
svnt
Mtquot
1. AOEQUATt
;. MReiWL
3. IMOEOUATC
4. RtSAmE
Sunnitlon of S-2-5, S-Z-6 fnd S-2-7.
H.O. Not Oetcn«ne
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-Inch FBC Unit* (Continued)
§
cAiton
». MOMTICS
MUMLO-
CfMMfU
Mm. SIDE
OMIB
ii. AHHAIIC
•ion
CftMUtt
it. nun.;
A. tommies
__
!«•• *•<
•UiMiilriinn
•fvacktorp-
tMMH
1.3-Otaklm-
t»mn»
•-*
7.S x 10*
I.K . 10s
2.M x IDS
4.S x 10*
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
5.0
S.O
mit
MOB
*n
IOUKI
•
•
•
1.0 x 102
•
•
1.0 x »3
I
1.« i 183
1.0 i W*
•
l.Ox ID3
S.»» 102
S.O x ID2
S.O x I02
S.O x 10*
S.Ox 10*
S.O I 102
S.O i I*2
S.O x 102
S.O x 102
INTE
UM
^%
•
.1
•
I
4.0 x M
4.S i 10
1.4 i H?
l.S i I01
4.0 i 10*
S.t i lot
».0 x l»>
1.0 x 10-2
1.0 i 10-2
1.0 x 10-2
1.0 x 10-2
l.Ox 10-2
1 .0 x 10-*
l.Ox 10-*
1 .0 x 10-2
1.0 x 10-*
HUE
1MB
•«/*
umonr
•
•
•
•
•
2.0
I
z.o
2.0. W
•
2.0
• 1.0
1.0
.
HUE HUM
W
urn i
SHS. IM. «.
12. t LC2
SMS. LM. CI2
IU2
MB. LM. CM
S*SS. LM. Cll
SJBS. LM. 1C
«SS. LM. LC4
SASS, LM. US
SASS, LM. LCS
SASS. LM. C12
1LC4
SASS. LM. IC4
SASS. LM. IC4
SASS. IM, ICS
SASS. LM. Ltt
SASS. LM. LCt
SASS. LM. Cll
SASS. LM. CI2
t 1C*
SASS. LM. ICt
SASS. LM. C12
t Ltt
SASS. LM. Ltt
SASS. LAB. 1C*
SASS. LM. 1C*
SAMU
W/-J
at*)
•9/1
VtaU2
7.U102
•.0.
I.D.
7.4X181
7.4x10*
2.4X102
2.4x»Z
4.UIO*
4.U101
4.1X102
4.U102
i.t*vf
l.fjilt?
H.O.
Lftiioi
3-txtO*
3.M102
J.falO*
l.txllf
l.tllO*
WTIO
sonc
HATE
•
•
0.32
O.OS
LEVU 2
KQUIUD
»-»cs
••NO
m
m
TCST
KTHOO1
TEST
EXKC-.
TATIONS'
UST
OKI1
SAint
ALiqUOT*
TABLE «TT:
TESTKTMDO
1. STMBAIB
2. CEK10T-
KITAl
3.
A. AAS
B. OB
£. HH
OKWCAL
0. ES£A
C. CC/M&
UMCICB TEST
suctns:
I. HI
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
CATEttBT
1. MKIMICS.
pOLmrwts
c. miBinc
•H3NOCT
»•*••$
1*. MLOMIMU
70. NIHOMOULS
•
ji. ncu
*o""ic
cwrotMo
l,«.Mhydn»y-
btfUCIK
btttol
1 iZ t J"Tr*ii|w'wyf*
tnnnti
M-MMray-
i-mptrtnoi
MtopMhol
hidMoti
nwwmthroH
AMoiphtlmo)!
Z"i»yw'0iy fluoFVHC
2-Hyilro«xt»«ol
Miu«(t)»yrtiw
OlbcnioU.li}
Mthrictm
M*-OtatUi/1b«»-
(»)-«nthr 10* (0.011
1.9 « 10* (O.OB
6. a > ID*
1.3S > 10)
i.sa * 10*
2.01 « 10*
4.64 > 10*
5.8 > 10*
2.11 I 10-*
9.71 » 10-*
2.t i 10-'
4.3 > 10
mn
WTfR
H/l
MCM.TM
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
1.0
S.O
S.O
S.O
S.O
t.
s.
s.
s.
s.
S.O
S.O
3.17 x 10-1
1.39
3.91
6.S « 10*
mtt
WTU
«/l
Etmwr
S.O • 10*
S.O > M*
S.O i 10*
S.O i 10*
S.O I 10*
S.O i 10*
S.O I 10*
S.O I 10*
S.O > 10*
S.O • 10*
S.O i 10*
Ol 10*
.0 • 10*
.Ol 10*
.0.10*
.Ol 10*
.0 I 10*
.0 i 10*
.0 i 10*
.0.10*
.0 I 10*
S.O f 10*
S.O • 10*
1
1
*
"
MIC
IMO
MUIIH
1.0 « ID-2
1.0 I 10-Z
1.0 I 10-*
1.0 I HT*
1.0 « 10-*
^i.e « to-*
l.C « 10-*
I.C > 10**
1.0 i 10-*
1.0 > 10-*
I.C * 10-*
1.0 > 10-*
l.C i 10-*
I.C > W*
1.0 I 10-*
1.0 i 10-*
1.0 > 10-*
1.0 > 10-*
1.0 I 10-*
1.0 i 10"*
1 .0 « 10-*
1.0 » 10-*
*.o» to-'
3.0 « 10-1
0.0 i 10°
1.3
mit
UWD
rt/9
CCO.OGT
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
t.o
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
t.o
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
i
II
II
R
MffK F01MO
M
urn i
SASS. U», ICf
5ASS, US, 1C*
SUS. LM. 1C*
SASS. UO. CIO
SASS. ue. to
SMS, IM. 1C*
SASS. Ut. U*
SASS. IA«, 1C*
USS. LAt. ttt
SASS. lAt, 1C*
SASS. UB, 1C*
SASS. IM. U3
SASS. LAI, 1C*
SASS. U». C)2
SASS. IM. no
SASS. LAB, in
SASS. IM. IC7
SASS. IM. U7
SASS. LM. IC7
SASS. LM. IC»
SASS. IM. C11
ILC7
SASS. LM, 1C?
SASS. IM. C12
1 LC7
SASS. LM. 10
SASS. LM. U3
SASS. LM. IC1
SASS. LM. IC3
UHV
*/•>
(Pl»>
•9/1
J.tllO2
3.0I02
3.«ilOt
».o.
3.UI/
1.«IO^
.falO*
iJtid-
3.MM)
NO
ns
ns
m
TEST
WWXi'
1^
1-C
i.r
TIST
u«c-.
TATlfliS*
1
1
1
TIST,
COST3
1
i
1
SAWlt.
Aiiouor
>
1
t
1
TWU 01:
Ttil tCDBO:
1. SWMHO
2. tonw-
t. MS
i. m
c. «t
t, fSCA
£. SC/K5
rtsi
'
S9COSS:
1. I1OI
2.
3.
3. TIST COST
i. fteat-
AtU
2. MOKMTE
4. SAHU
1. AKDWTE
2. MMCIML
3.
4.
tloi •< S-2-S, t-2-6, and S-2-7.
N.D. Not
N No niM
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
o
CO
union
CBMTOIMO
t.lO-Btetkyl-1.1
Z'btuMtk»c,l)
twjrlm
OiDciuoU.Opynnt
PhetMtkniK
NeUwlchryim*
Chi-JrtfiM:
MCCM
B*»»U)p»m>e
Dlbeaia(<.k)nrrene
Olb«u(*.c)
•ntHracene
1.2:1.4- Otbeuo-
Mthruene
l«uo( gk»ry«n*
tefuo(c)ptmv-
•nthrcM
Methyl (*en- jnf hrenes
hpktlulene
«ntfcnceM;Hetliyl
Anthracene
Mmultyl
IU (XltlWltr.es
Owctftyl
bphtlulenes
fynne
Ftellyl Niphtlu-
lenes
AceiupkUwM;
Aceiuptithylene
2.7-Ot«ethyl-
utkriceM
ttophUvKew
Trlpkenjflew
MATE
^^(W")
2.M i 10
4.45 < 10
3.12 i 10*
5.43 > 10*
1.08 > JO*
1.&9 i 10*
1.79 i 10*
2.2 i 10*
2.5 t 10*
3.04 > 10J
3.48 « 10'
9.9 « 10*
1.0 » 10*
1.63 s 10*
2.69 x 104
3.04 x 10*
S.O i 104
5.6 i 10*
2.25 x 105
2.25 i 10s
2.33 > 10*
ft
H
X
N
H
MIC
MATE*
HEALTH
4.44 t tO2
S.I? i 10*
4.98 i 10*
«.1S i 10*
1.62 I 10*
2.» i 10*
2.M * ID*
1.3 « 10*
1.75 > 104
4.56 < 10*
S.S2 i 10*
j.s » 10s
l.S x 10s
2.45 > 10s
4.04 I 10s
4.66 t 10S
7.S > 105
8.4 < 10s
3.38 i 106
3. IB > ID6
3.5 » 10*
»
N
N
N
N
l«Tt
WTER
•4/1
EOM.OCV
1
«
II
»
N
M
N
II
II
II
H
N
N
N
N
II
1.0 x 10*
N
N
N
N
M
II
N
N
"
MIC
1MB
NCM.TM
1.1
•
*
1.2 i 10
4.8 I 10
S.4 x 10
i.6 I 10
7.5 i 10
9.1 i 10
1.1 i 10?
3.0 i 102
4.8 > 10*
8. 2' I 10*
9.1 x 102
l.S I 10*
1.7 x 10*
».8 x 103
6.8 x 10*
*.9 X 10>
II
N
II
II
N
MIC
UNO
tca.aor
•
•
N
•
H
»
N
2.0 > 10- t
N
N
M
II
N
H
N
N
N
wan RMO
II
lUtl 1
uss. ui. 10
SMS, IM, IC3
SASS. LM. 1U
SMS. UW. IU
S«S, LM. IC3
SMS. LM, ICJ
SASS. IM. IC3
SASS. LM. LCI
SASS, IM. LCI
SASS, LM. ia
SASS. LM. U3
SASS. LM. U3
SASS. IM. IC3
SASS. LM. tCl
SASS. LM. iC3
SASS. LM. U3
SASS. LM. Cll
1 LC?
SASS, LM, IC3
SASS. IM. IC2
SASS. IM. LC2
SASS. LM. ICJ
SASS. LM. LC3
SASS. LM. LC3
SASS, LU. LC3
SASS. LM, LC3
SASS, IM, LC3
JP;
IM»>
•»/!
S.JxlO2
S.lilO1
S.LxlO2
S.lxlO2
S.lilO2
S.lJilO2
5.1x10^
S.LxlO*
S.lxlO7
S.lilO2
s.uta2
S.U102
S.lxlO1
S.UIO2
S.lxlO2
S.U102
1.3xlOJ
S.U102
1.3«103
l.lxlO3
5.U102
S.lilO2
5.U102
5.1*10*
S.U102
S.lilO2
MTIO
SAMPIE
MATE
itni 2
KOU1KO
«-HS
*>NO
iai
HETMOO*
1ESI
OFEC-
TATIOH2
TEST.
COST*
simr
ALIQUOT*
TABU KEY:
TEST NETHOO
1. STAMWO
2. OEnLOf-
KMTM.
1. MOOM
A. MS
8. XltO
C. MCI
CHtHICAL
0. ESCA
E. 6C/HS
EIKCTEO TEST
SUCCESS:
1. HIGH
2. HOOEMTE
3. UMOOM
. TEST COST
1. WASOH-
MLE
2. MOOfRATE
3. HIGH
. SAtTlt
AlIQUOT
1. ADEQUATE
2. NM6INAI
3. INADEQUATE
4. RESANPLE
SuMHtloa Of S-2-S, 5-2-6 ind S-2-7.
N.O. Hot Dtunttwd
N NO Klu*
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-Inch FBC Unit* (Continued)
mow
R. •***•*-
«mmt
»ictaic
CM«M
l-fliUqrl tjm
vfwtltyt ^y^^n^
l.t taMMtklltt-
uw
ftrrlWl
COTMM
I-MHkrl-
CtalMlkntM
ton(b)
fl«annt*m
•nn(t)
(IHBTMUm
l«*«(l.M,t.<|
fl^VW
IWMU)
flMTMt^VM
l.^>.»-IM>mi»-
HuUwWtf?*..- .<
l»«im, liOm
rlm-MiUm.
(Mtrtlir**.
flurHMknt)
riMrt.lt
MfMtalm
(.l-mmflnr-
f«*
I.I-MMOOOTM
Cnl.n«u<«r«l-
ptHMflAWvM
IrwmtTrttnqrt-
fnv flvwvw)
MTE
«*/^"(lwl
i.n
t.n < ia*
I.M * to1
i.u » ia3
«.«» i t»*
i.Ji i if
I.M » »'
4,f • I** (Ml
I,* 1 10*
I
R
•
1
•
1
wn
Mftl
^1,
•
•
«
•
t
Ml > 10
I.M 1 l«*
».« « W4
1.45 i Id4
i.n t w*
I.* tit1
I.M * \f
t.n i IP*
I.U i 10*
•
t
*
•
•
•
NMt
wm
«vi
caua
•
t
•
i
«
i
i
«
•
•
*
....H*
1
1
1
I
*
1
•
1
Mtt
1MB
£1
•
i
•
i
*
M « W1
Mi W
«.*! M
«.i j »
t.» > l«*
«.f M ff
*-f-t P
•
r.ti m*
i
•
»
•
•
•
HUH
UM
£l«
*
I
•
•
«
•
1
R
I
R
1
».» . MT«
R
I
•
•
•
1
I
R
IMM roMI
n
tint i
MR. U*. iO
ust. u«. ta
M*«, M*. 10
MSS,- tM. ICI
ma. u», la
M55, IM. Itl
ua. IM. ia
MSS. IM. Ut
SUSS, IM. Id
MSS, IM. ICJ
MSJ. IM. IU .
MB. IM. CIO
MB. IM. en
MSS. IM. Ul
MSI. IM. ICt
MIS. IM. 1C?
MSS, IM, 1C)
MSS. IM. IU
Mtt. tM. ICI
MSI. IM. IU
w«ni
o*-1
but
f/i
1.1 » la*
t.I > 10*
I.I a 10*
1.1 < lo*
J.I i 10*
I'lJLjfi.
S.I I 10*
M • 10*
«M» lo1
dinv*
4i.ii>
i,».
R.».
i.l « 19*
I'll W1
I.I i tf
1(1 * \f
1,1 1 It*
*.i • if
ta • 10*
MTIO
MMU
Tonr
1.1 1 10*
.
R
"
um i
•4NK1
r.tts
»••
ni
UA ^
.
n«
W1MD1
1^
, lit _
,
.
IU1
imi-
UIIOB'
nsi
cast!
s/mt.
M.IOUOT4
IDRtl ttT:
. TCST
•now-
ISM
KM
UHCTU H3T
SRCOSS:
RI«R
nit t*st
.c
M.IOUT
»MItl«l «T S-t-t, l-M. «W S-f-7.
I.I. IM tiUmliwd
I •§ Tllw
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
CAIECORT
». HETfWCYCUC
NITMKU
A. miDM i
mimes
§. FUSED
6-MDBCftCD
•IK
c. ntaOLE AND
RING
DERIVATIVES
COMPOUND
ryridtM
H t p»ljti*it1-
Mcd nrrldlari
riultun
ttloroe/rldim
CaltidlMS
feoosvbttlUUd
AUyl ryrUliwt
BlbnilU.il)
*crMiM
DtbcuUJ)
acrldlnt
BMi(c)1tiK
tnio(h)qulM>11iie
B**i<>U)*crtdtM'
D4bc*> H-Ifldeno
(1.2*l)>qu1lM
Indmo (l,2,i,I.J)
ItaqvlnoKne
Dltaiuofc.d)
urtuiole
Pjrrrelt
Oibcniol'.g)
urtutol*
Indole
NUt
•wS'lp..)
1.4 a M* (S)
I.I I M*
3.W i U*
4.K > 1*1
S.» i 10*
•
2.24 i M2
2.47 i W2
1.1 • W*
1.U • 10*
2.11 < U»*
S.M » M*
t.O i W4
1
I
•
•
I
•
1
I
1.05 i 10>
i. n * i»J
i.OJ • lfr>
I.I < 10*
mtc
WTU
NULTM
2.2S « 10*
4. OS x 10s
S.J4 i 10s
7,21 x 10*
1.0 « 10*
•
3.3» 11 103
1.71 I 103
1.6 « 10&
2.17 > 10*
3.S l ID*
*.3I « 105
1.4 l 10*
II
M
k
M
H
II
M
N
I.S8 x 103
4.11 x 10*
9.0S x 10*
1.7 k 105
mrt
mm
«•/!
Ecoioer
1.0 » 10*
N
N
II
II
1
•
II
II
N
N
H
»
»
H
*
n
M
N
II
N
N
M
N
H
UtTE
um
,3ft*
4.S < 10*
•.2 x I02
1.1 I 10*
1.4 x 102
2.1 x 103
•
t.7
7.4
1.2 i 10*
4.7 « 102
l.t x 10*
1.7 x 10)
2.7 i I0l
*
II
II
II
*
«
I
It
3.0
a.i i 10
1.8 i 102
1.1 « 102
mn
LAW
Etoion
2.0 x 10
II
I
II
II
II
II
«
II
II
1
N
II
II
N
N
II
II
N
N
H
M
N
N
N
MKH FOdD
II
urn i
SASS. UK. d
SMS. LM. CW
SASS. LM. a
SASS. u», c)
to*
SASS. LM, CB
t LO
SASS. LM. IC1
SASS. LM. 1C*
SASS. LM, ICf
SASS. LM. LCt'
SASS. LM. Itt
SASS. LM. LCt
SASS. LM, LCt
SASS. LM. LCt
SASS. LM. LCt
SASS. LM, 1C*
SASS, LM. LCt
SASS. LM, LCt
SASS. 1M» LCt
SASS. LM. Itt
SASS. LM. LCf
SASS, Ltt. LCt
SASS, LM, LCt
SASS, LM. ICt
SASS. LM, 1C*
SASS. LM. LCf
%?
'S!
N.O.
N.O.
M.D.
R.D.
S.lxlO2
S.lilO2
l.ixlO2
l.ixloZ
l.fxlO2
3.4.102
l.ixlO2
l.txlO2
l.txlO2
l.txltf
3.WI?
l.fxlO2
3.
C. «T
CHCHICAL
0. ESCA
E. CC/KS
EUfOEb TEST
SUCCESS:
I. HIGH
2. KWHATE
1. UNUMH
TEST COST
1. KASON-
MLC
2. WMRATt
1. HIGH
. SAMPLE
ALIQUOT
I. ADEQUATE
2. HMtGlNAl
3. IHAOEQUATE
4. HCSAMPLE
SwMtlonaf S-2-S. S-2-6, *nd S-2-7.
R.D. (tot Dtucted
« II Ulut
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
CMlCOn
p. mnoca
OnaOCnUS
rartftataf
MOriffnORMB
n. KTaaaaic
01 TIQBOi
4*. itttBdtralc
SOUOO
1*. MCMMKnUICS
*. MJm. «r
NHl
COMPOUND
MI«Mo(a,l)
ortanlt
taM(<)
Uftttltl*
CirtMnlf
*M*ftMil«
OmmfttinU
•rtlgrl
tawUUnln
Mtnfeyoftrenmi
F«rw
0««r»f»nri
OMtjrMMmm-
hrawt
•XftttofiTM*
•"£$&!.;
n*M*uv*<»,
M-t>)firM
1 * OlMDI-
"«*—
"SSSl**"
m*»t
Mt*tttlo»lin«
OnnMtttaptaM
•tattrl-
t*tl«4.B«l
Trti fetrantkyl
fMo^p^oMMC
?.J-«lthlo*fcm
OMwUtoptaM
Any* Itercwy
Mnrtkgrl LM*
Ol««ilH«
TltiMaUyl LM*
OIIMHUBIIHI
Trtartkrl ArtlM
HOT
•V^'ll*-)
I.IS f M*
).• i M*
t.»i M*
4.$ iM«
4.8* M>
«.n« w>
S.» l 10 (If*)
•
i
•
•
i
•
*
•
tM * M*
4.t i W>
Z.»« M*
Z.» 1 M*
•
I
I
1
1.0 » M (.Ml)
i.t i if (.mm]
l.» l M*
1.S • X* |.»M)
J.» • M*
1
mre
wrei
NM.TM
t.n> M>
?.M i M*
1.X it !•*
«.». >e»
«.4Z I W*
7.10 < U«
a.M« to*
•
1
»
•
•
•
1
' •
1.4« « M*
«.!»« M<
3.Ji « M>
J.«» M*
•
•
I
•
I.J l 10»
I.I » 103
1.» i M>
* .8 I M1
4.71 « M*
*
NNE
WTU
X/1
ttaotT
•
1
•
1
•
I
•
I
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
.. •
•
I
•
•
• •
•
•
1.0 « M-«
<4.* > M<
•
•
•
•
nm
u»
.r™
l.( I M*
$.« * M*
*J« M»
1.4 l Ml
».4 i M*
1.4, M«
1.0 i 104
•
•
•
•
•
•
«
•
1.0 l M
1.4 B M*
7.0« M*
7.0i M>
•
•
•
•
1.0 « 10-1
1.0
4.S
».4 > M*
•
mn
UM
«££
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
*
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
4.0 « Iff-*
•
•
•
I
was rooo
ii
urn i
IMS. IM. ICt
MB. UO. 10
SMS. UO. ICC
SMS. UO). 10
SMS. UO. 10
SMS. UO. U*
SMS. UO. IB
CM. ritu. a
SMS. UO. CM
SMS. UO. tCS
SMS. UO, US
SMS. uo. ta
SMS. uo. ta
SMS. UO. US
SMS. UO. 10
SMS. UO. U*
MS, riiu. a
SMS. UO.CO
SMS. UO. U4
SMS. uo. a
SMS. UO. CM
SMS. UO. U4
SMS. UO. U*
CMS. riao. a
SMS. UO. C12
•AU1
_«&_uao.o_
SMS. ui. a
CM. ntu. a
GAS. ria0. a
*?
IH»)
»«/1
J.Mltf
J.Mtt
Mmut
_itaUt
l.t«102
1.IU01
74.I02
• I
I.B
thin1
I.4U02
74.M»
Z.4dO<
«w
t.HlJ
4.1x10*
•J.
R.O.
4.U10*
0.0.
0.0.
4.1U01
4.U10*
«.».
}.t*vf
I.D.
1.0.
1.0.
I.t.
WHO
ami
mn
o.«
7.5
ina i
onoiou
»'«D
040
00
IB
ns
TIST
1-C
14
TEST
[IKC-
TATIWISZ
1
1
nsr,
COST'
1
1
ymt
wignor*
1
,
U O1:
TtST (
'
A. MS
». UO
c. wr
oojqcn
o. rsa
2. CtffCTtO TOT
SWXtSS:
1. mat
2. ramrt
1. TtSI COST
j'. NICO
4. SMOU
2! HMCIM.
1. IWKOWTt
4. OOMnC
oo *f S-t-S. t-t-t mt S-2-7.
0.0.
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-Inch FBC Unit* (Continued)
CATEOK
1. UflNKM
ira
C. METAi
AWOTHEI
CWlAltS
CDNHMN&
ilclclocmc
ftrroctne
(Hbenien*
Copper
EMpleud
Nickel
CMpIeinl Iran
CdBplexrt TU
COBplCMd ZtK
mis
All
J.S « K>3
5.H i 10*
1
1.52 i I0>
N
»
II
»
miE
tMTU
HULIH
i.ZS » 10*
8.11 « 10S
II
s.za > to4
•
N
1
II
MIE
MTEI
ccotost
II
1
II
N
i
1
II
I
HATE
LAND
HEM.IH
1.0 i 10*
i.e « ioi
•
9.0 « 10
N
N
N
II
MTE
IMO
Eeoion
i
N
N
1
1
N
•
I
HKK rowo
It
UU.IM.U4
MsjiEia.a
i'
4 I.IB2
H.9.
IAIIO
$At<^E
MTE
(.11
LETEi t
IEQUIKD
T-TES
*•»
n
TEST .
HttHOO1
IEST
E1«C-
TAT10HS2
TEST
COST
SANP1E
niouoi*
TABlf «t
. TEST
I. STAMMK.
2. WYCIO-
KNTAl
J. UNMOMI
A. AAS
8. 180
C. WU
CMCMlUt
D. ESU
C. GC/K
CXPtCTCJi TES
SUCCESS
t. HIGH
2. WOfWIE
3. unman
Ttsr COST
1. RCAU*-
ULf
].
SAM>lt
AUOUf!
t. RCSW-.t
itttm of S-2-5. 5-2-6 tnH 5-?-'
D.O. Not Determined
II No Vilu*
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
cMtmnr
27. LITHIUM
28. SODIUM
21. POTASSIUM
M. ROBIOIUH
31. CESIUM
32. UlnilUH
33. HUMES lift
3». CALCIUM
*
COftRXMO
u
Lt*
lir (n it)
Ll7<»j-<« 11)
III
«•»
MM
01
t
«* (M «)
»•>
cs*l
It
'•t-
M(« It)
srii?"1"
ihpntM. M»
Myrnlvi Ion. Mj*«
MtpniiB OKI*.
IktMitw n>ort4t.
"?»(•«*»)
MMrmlai s«tr
2.» I»J
1.21 10s
». If 10*
2.
2.
2.0
t.O > 101
t.OI i 10'
l.»l i I04
1.0 i 101
t.O > 10>
*.l > I03
«.0 « I01
(.0 i 1C3
l.t > 104
II
II
II
N
Wit
WTER
HUL1M
3.3 « 10*
3.1 > 10t
3.3 x 10*
3.3 * 102
1.8 » 102
(.0 » 1<#
3.0 « 10*
3.0 » 10*
II
*
1.82 > 10*
1.23 I 10*
3.0 « 10
3.0 i 10
3.0 I 10
t.O « 10*
9.0 i 10*
I.S • 10*
1.0 « 10*
*.0 « 10*
t.O * ID*
t.O > 10*
t.O > 10*
2.4 i 10*
II
II
II
II
mn
WTER
CCOL08T
3.8 i 102
3.8 > 102
3.8 it 102
3.8 • 102
R
R
R
8
R
2.3 i 10*
R
R
S.5 i 10
5.1 > 10
S.S « 10
8.7 i 10*
8.7 > 10*
1.0 • 10*
8.7 « 10*
8.7 « 10*
8.7 I 10*
8.7 » 10*
8.7 I 10*
1.6 i 10*
I
R
II
II
MTC
LMO
MULTK
7.0 1 10-'
t.f W3
(.8 M
f.O 10
3.M > 10*
2.4* i 103
t.O • 10-2
t.O i 10-'
t.O i Iff"'
1.8 i 10*
1.8 I 1«2
3.8 • 102
1.8 > 102
1.8 > 102
1.8 I 10*.
I.I I 10*
t.l 1-102
«.« i 102
R
R
R
II
MTC
urn
«£&
7.S I 10-'
R
II
R
R
«.f i 10
R
R
1.1 « 1C-'
1.1 II 10-»
1.1 I 10-'
1.7 « 10*
1.7 > 10*
2.0 i 10*
1.7 « 10*
1.7 > 10*
1.7 > 10*
1.7 > 10*
1.7 « 10*
3.2 » 10
II
R
R
N
3?
IK*>
•VI
2.3x10*
J.7UO*
t.tulO*
I.IB1
1.7x10
1.1
1.8x10*
1.3x10*
RATIO
w
U.f
1.0
2.0
11.3
81.0
itni 2
HQUIKO
»'IU
»RO
TO
to
m
•0
80
US
m
ns
TIST ,
METHOD'
l-A
l-A
i-*
l-A
1-*
TOT
OKC-,
MJIOB57
1
»
1
.,
>
»
TtST
COST'
i
»
i
i
i
SMVLE.
ALIQUOT*
1
1
1
1
1
TUlt Ht:
TtST METHOD
1. STMOMO
2. Dtwior-
MEKTAL
3. URXMWR
AAS
no
wr
CHEMICAL
ESCA
GC/M5
CWCTE8 TtST
UCCESS:
. NIGH
. MOOEMTE
iMmR
TtST COSt
RMSORA8LE
WOCKATE
HIGH
SAMPlt ALigUOT
AWOWTE
MWMML
1RAKQWTE
HSMdE
itlon of S-2-S, S-2-« Mrf S-2-7
R.O. Rot Otttraliwt
R Ro Yilut
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-Inch FBC Unit* (Continued)
o
>£>
CAUOMT
X. SIHMTIM
X. lUtlUM
17. WMOtt
3>. ALUMINUM
3*. CALLIUH
tUMMD
SUwttw
Un-tlM to>.
Sr»* (« Sr)
StnMtim riwMc,
fcf » (M Sr)
MmrtlM SutraU,
SrfO, (0 Sr)
brtx*. hi
l*rt« IM. b"
<•* b)
ItriM Sitrtde.
US
•xrw OH**. »j«3
AlviM. A)
AMw Iw.
Al"*
bniU. AljOj-
»*0 (w »lV
l%*-aU4 AliMiMi
Stticat* (*i Al)
Al«, [N Al (W«)71
(HZO), (« Al)
Alwtata Oxide,
AliO]
falliH. 6l
CUnUl Species.
b
OHMS. b*<
(« b)
mu
All
x/^Ipv-)
1.1 « 101
J.) I U)
1.1 I l(p
J.I • ie>
S.O i ID?
S.O i 10*
S.O I 10*
&.« I 10*
S.O > 10*
S.O I TO*
*.» m M*
J.1 x Vf
1.1 i 103
1.1 • I01
t.O « 10*
S.2 x I0>
S.I » ) to1
S.2 x I03
1.0 « 10*
S.O x 10*
S.O « 101
S.O i to*
MOT
«TU
«t/l
HAin
4.t I 10*
4.i i 10*
«.t i 10*
4.1 i 10*
s.o i to1
S.O i 101
S.O x UP
S.O « IB3
S.O > I03
S.O I 10J
S.O i ID1
4.J I 10*
4.7 x 10*
4.7 i 10*
l.S i 10*
1.8 x 10*
1.0 i 10*
0.0 i 10*
0.0 i 10*
0.0 i 10*
l.S i 10s
7.4 x 10*
7.4 X 10*
7.4 x 10*
mu
UA1CI
•4/1
tcaocr
*
•
•
•
2.S x 10l
2.S x 103
7.S x I0l
2.4 i 103
Z.S i 103
8.S x M1
2.S x 103
Z.S x 10*
2.S x 10*
2.S x W*
•
1.0 x tO>
1.0 i I03
1.0 x IB3
1.0 x 103
1.0 x I03
•
M
M
H
NUT
uo>
•9/1
KAtn
».2 i M
•Jx W
*.l I M
9.2 i W
1.0 i U
1.0 i 14)
1.0 i 10
1.0 I 10
1.0 x W
1.0 x 10
1.0 x 10
f.lx W
*.l x H
».} i M
1.0 x 10*
).t x 10?
l.t I 10*
i.t i \af
l.i i 10Z
1.« x 10*
1.0 X 10*
l.S i U?
l.S X 10*
l.S I 10*
mil
LAW
tmoci
•
•
i
•
S.O
S.O
s.o
S.O
$.0
S.O
S.O
S.O i 10
S.O x M
S.O I 10
N
2.01
N
2.0
2.0
2.0
•
II
1
I
$y
(»•)
««/>
4.3U03
l.fclfl*
LfcaaL
1.4x10*
-10
•AIM
W
1.4
n
O.B
too
uw. 2
KDBIOEB
t-ns
»•»
TO
Ytt
xD
IES
•0
TEST ,
icnoD1
1-A
I-A
1-A
IUT
tIKC-,
IATIOK*
1
1
1
Tin
cmii
i
i
i
SAWIC.
ALiguor
i
i
i
TAOLC tZT:
I. TtST MTIWO
2. aaajor
NUTAL
AAS
no
MTT
CMCIUCM.
OCA
cc/n
2. IIKCTfO rtST
I. Ol«
2. WtttATI
1.
1. TtST COST
I. KASDMOU
2. HOOCMTE
1. NI0
4. SAMFU I
I.
2. NMBIWL
1. IxMCgtAK
4. KVM01C
itlon of S-2-S. S-Z-4 Md S-Z-7
N.O. Nat OctanlMd
• la Vilxc
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-Inch FBC Unit* (Continued)
I
l->
s
CMODRt
•• •
4o. imm
41. TMM1IM
42. CAROOR
43. SILICON
44. CERNMIUN
m^j.
SHU. (••>
itt)
Mlln St*M-
CV*
Ml*, to
M« I-. to«
IMIIM. n
H»IIM». n"
Tfaiiic. ?i»3
ttaMUl Cw*w
CMl
Ctrtlfe. C-
Cntoniu. Wj-»
Ofcwtwtt. MWj
UrVMqrt, CO*
brtan HmUt
C*rtw Dint*
Sllw, SINi
SIIICM. SI
OrUnlltciU.
SM*-<
NttMlllutr,
sw,-*
Slllcm Most*.
SIOz
SIIICOT OftvlfMt.
SISZ
SIIICM ClfM*. SIC
CtraMiiB, (f
Bu-amiM. te«*
(««*)
Cmmlc. fc**
(«Ct)
Btmmmi Srifl*.
•rt (H to)
•traMlc Snirict.
StSj (M Ct)
tonmt. CtN«
(MO)
fcnMtiH Oil*.
• MI (u o)
Mil
in
•V^(w-)
S.« I M1
j.o • n1
1. 1 W*
1. .10!
i. i i«t
1. t W»
1. I 10»
J.S I I0>
1
II
1
«
*
4.0 > I03 <*)
t.O I 10* («MO)
7.0 x \tf
1.0 i I04
•
II
1.0 i 10*
•
1.0 « 10*
$.* I I0>
«.« i ID*
t.* « M>
5.* I 10*
».* I 10*
i.6 • 10*
I.i lV
mir
nun
ictnt
7.4 i W*
r.4 • io*
. «n»
. iWl
. 1 103
. noi
. «IO>
S.1 i M*
•
•
•
•
II
f.O I 10*
1
I.I • W*
1.5 I 10*
I
I
I.S • 10s
•
I.S > 10*
•.4 I I0>
0.4 « 10*
•.4 « W>
0.4 > I*3
0.4 « 10*
0.4 • 1O>
0.4 i ID1
mu
MTU
rt/l
[outer
*
N
R
N
i
II
N
•
I
II
I
II
II
t.O I 10
II
II
M
N
II
II
N
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
mn
IMO
NULIN
I.S t 10*
I.S II 10*
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
3.0
l.t • 10*
i
II
II
II
II
VK
N/A
I
3.0 > 10*
1
R
3.0 > 10*
II
3.0 • 10*
1.7 I 10
1.7 > 10
1.7 > 10
1.7 I 10
1.7 • 10
1.7 « 10
1.7 i 10
mn
1MB
•*/*
{OUST
•
0
1
•
0
n
i
i
•
i
R
•
«
IVA
W*
2.* I M
1
I
0
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
R
SAMPLE
s
rt/1
«»
«ja
!•.«*
R.O. -
in
3.SI10*
1 2>10
RATIO
HSU
Mil
i.i
390
itm-2
WQUIKO
T-m
••no
RO
•>
frt
ns
RO
TCS1 .
KTHOO'
I •
1-*
TEST
line-,
TAT IONS*
1
1
TtST,
COST'
1
1
SWflE.
Auqeor
i
i
TABU «T:
TEST METHOD
1. STANDARD
2. DEVEIOP-
HERTAl
3. UROKMI
A. AAS
I. «M)
C. HET
CHEMICAL
D. ESCA
E. SC/«
tXPtCTEO TEST
SUCCESS:
1. HICH
2. MMXRATE
3. UKMMR
, TEST COST
I. REASONABLE
2. HOOEMTC
3. NIM
SAMPLE
ALIQUOT
1. ADEQUATE
2. NMtGIRAl
3. INADEQUATE
4. RESAMPLE
SWHtlon of S-2-5. S-2-* mt S-2-7
R.D.
R
Not OtUnlMd
No hint
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
aiECMV
45. TIN
4t. LEAD
47. NITROGEN
COMPOUND
Til Oxldt, SnO;>
Tl*. i»
SIMMS, in'*
SUMtC, >««
LM4, Pt
EleMUl IK). Pb
PlHtott. Pb'*
(u Pl>)'
LMd Mmitde.
PbO (41 Pb)
LMd SMl file.
PbS04 (is Pb)
LMd SiilfiU,
Pbs (is Pb)
LCM) Ctrbuute,
PbCOj (is Pb)
Lcid Phosphite.
Pbj(PO«)2 (« Pb)
LMd Oirowte,
P6Crt« (is Pb)
LMd Nnlytxbte.
PM%)04 (is Pb)
Lud ArseMte.
PbHAiO« (is Pb)
Hydnilne
A1UH Cymides.
mat, UN
Mkv Acid, HH03
Nitrogen Oxides,
NjO. NO?. 11^04.
Hydrogen Cyanide,
HOC
A«K«ii, NH)
Cy«no9en. C2N2
Nitride. N-
«Ur«te. No3-
Nltrlu, Nflfc-
Avmiui, NH4+
MATE
1.0 x ID4
II
*
N
l.S i 10*
l.S i 10*
l.S i 10*
1.5 I 10*
l.S i 10*
1.5 x 10*
l.S I 10*
l.S i 10*
l.S x 10*
1.5 x 10*
l.S x 10*
l.S x 10*
1.5 x 10* (.1)
5.0 x 103
5.0 i 101
9.0 i 103
1.1 i I04 (10)
1.8 « 10* (25)
2.0 x 10*
N
N
N
N
mn
MATE*
MEAtTM
l.S x 10s
i
i
l
2.5 t 10*
2.5 i 10*
2.5 i 10*
Z.S i 10*
2.5 < 10*
2.5 . 10*
2.S > 10*
2.5 > 10*
2.5 i 10*
2.5 i 10*
2.5 i 10*
2.5 > 10*
2.3
S.O « 10*
7.5 x 10*
1.4 > 10*
5.0 > 10*
L2.i i 10*
1.0 i IflJ
N
N
N
N
ECOLOGY
*
»
*
1
S.O I 10
S.O > 10
S.O i 10
S.O i 10
S.O x 10
5.0 x 10
5.0 i 10
s.o x 10
S.O i 10
5.0 x 10
S.O x 10
S.O i 10
N
2.5 i 10
4.5 i 10*
N
2.5 x 10
S.O X 10
2.5 i 10
N
N
II
"
NATE
LMD
M/f
HtAL III
1.0
•
•
•
S.O x 10-'
5.0 I 10-'
S.O x 10-1
S.O i 10-'
5.0 i t0-'
5.0 x 10-'
4.5
1.0
l.S x 103
w
).«
5.0
2.0
N
N
N
N
miE
LAND
ECOLOGY
fl
N
1
II
1.0 I 10-'
1.0 > 10-'
1.0 i 10-'
1.0 i 10-'
1.0 I 10-1
LOU 10-:
1.0 x 10-'
1.0 x 10-'
1.0 x ID-'
1.0 I 10-1
1.0 x 10-'
1.0 x 10-1
N
S.O x 10-*
».0 i 10-*
N/A
S.O x 10-*
1.0 x 10-'
5.0 x 10-2
N
II
N
"
MS/I
l.feU*
UiiaL
• .D.
_
I
.8x10*
MTIO
MH
0.02
u
" '
10
LEKL 2
KOUIftfO
1-YES
«-NO
NO
res
YES1
TEST
METHOD'
1-A
1-C
TEST
EWK-
TATIONS?
1
I
i
i
t
J
1 I
TEST
COST1
l
J
1
SAMPLE
ALIQUOT4
j
1
,
•>.
J.
4.
TABLE UT:
. TEST WTHOO
1. STAMAtC
2. DEVELCC-
xunu.
}. WOOff
A. AAi
6. Ike
c. wr
CWWCAL
D. (SCA
E. CC/>6
E«MCTES TEST
SUCCESS
I. Hlwl
TEST C05T
1.
2.
3. HlOf
SAMPLE
I.
2.
3
4. RCUW.E
ttm Of S-2-5, S-2-6 «nd S-2-7
H.O. Not >t«nrlM
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
I
>-«
H-»
ro
CATtWff
•. MOSMOMS
*». MKCRIC
VI. MTIMONT
SI. IISWTH
COMPOUND
dmpkonn. f
MwiftUf. HO]-'
IMP) '
ll»knpluu.
Kiwi- (•> P)
PtMifMiw. PHJ
Pt«Mf4x)rlc Acid.
NlP*
Phot pit* r»
PMUMtridt
; Pkottlutt. PO«-J
Anmlc, /If
IkUlltc Aricntc
AfMMW. At')
Anmle, As»s
M*-**"-'
;W.Mor>
ArM*l4t. A»->
107 (0.1)
1.0 • »3
1.0 i 10*
1.0 > 10
2.0 i 10
2.0 I 10
2.0 « 10
2.0 I 10
2.0 > 10
2.0 I 10
2.0 » 10
2.0 i 10
$.0 > 10'
f.O > 10*
S.O l 10*
s.o « to2
i.O i 10*
S.O i 10*
s.o • to*
4.1 .10*
4.1 I 10*
4.1 I 10*
4.1 « 10*
WTT
»rat
.rift.
I.S « W
I.S l»4
1.1 i 10*
*.• > loJ
I.S • W*
I.S • 1fl4
f.S • W*
2.S f 10*
2.S I W*
2.* i 10*
2.S « W*
2.S l 10*
2.S > W*
2.S x 10*
2.S i 10*
;.s i M*
7.S I lO*
T.S l I0»
r.s * MP
;.s > i*3
r.s > io3
7.S I 10>
* ! I 101
(.1 « IB3
I.I i I03
(.1 I l«l
mn
MTtt
«/l
[CKoer
S.t I 10-'
1.0 > 10-1
S.O I 10-1
*
4.S « 1 10*
(« »)
2.0 I 10*
2.0 > 101
2.0 • 10*
2.0 > 10*
2.0 i 10*
2.0 > 10* j
II
N
N
N
mrt
urn
HCALIM
J.O I 10
3.0 l 10
1.0 > 10
VA
3.0 * 10
3.0 « 10
II
S.O x 10-1
S.O • 10-*
s.o > 10-'
S.O I 10-'
S.O x 10-1
S.O x IO-1
S.O x 10-'
S.O X 10-1
S.O I 10-1
I.S x 10
I.S x 101
t.S x 10*
I.S x 10'
t.S x 10*
I.S x 10*
I.S x 10*
1.2 x 10'
1.* « 101
1.? I 10'
1.2 « 10'
mrt
1MB
•f/l
toaoer
1.0x10-3
1.0 x 10-3
1.0 x 10-1
VA
».o,
•
1.0 i W-1
1.0 x 10-'
I.Ox 10-*
1.0 x 10-'-
I.Ox It-'
1.0 I 10-*
1.0 x W*
>.t x 10-'
i.o i »•'
4.0 x 10-'
(«»)
4.0 I 10-'
4.0 x 10-1
4.0 x 10-'
4.0 X 10-1
4.0 I 10-1
4.0 I 10-'
I
II
•
II
sy
W
,lxlO>
•JxJJU
.»
1.7x10
KAT10
TlBl
11
1.1
0.1
0.4
inm *
KW1IU
f«TU
MB
TB
to
W
W
TUT
irntw1
ij»
i
US!
UKC-.
TAT IOR$'
1
1
ttsi,
C05T3
1
1
SAinr
ALIQUOT4
1
1 ...
TABU
TfSt "CTOOO
STAMMD
OEVCLOP-
KKTAL
AAS
XDO
NtT
CKNICAl
tSCA
ss/w
IPCCTED TtST
SUCMSS:
HIGH
. K»t BATE
UKUIOW
ar COST
. (KASOMBK
. mOWTE
. MICH
. AOfqWTE
. KSAMPIE
t1on of S-Z-5, S-*-« «nd S-Z-7
N.O. Nat D«teni1iwl
N No Uliw
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
I
i—•
i—••
CO
CAiton
12. onta
u. sitnt
44. SOO1M
u. rauuM
U. FURRUK
cowooRO
ta-t. 0,
Rkoftlc Silfw. Sg
S>lfM>, S'2
telht*. SV1
S.1IIU, SOr2
niocyiMU. «r
felhr TrlwUt.
SO,
Suite-It Acid,
•ZM,
Sulta- ftlnldn.
%
Hr*»it> Silfldt.
V
C*r*«« OtMlft*,
C*2
UrtoM?) SolfM*.
MS
Selnlia. S*
ElMMUl S*l«llM.
S«
Sctol*. Sf *
SttmlU*. S«0]-2
(«S«)
Stl«Mt«. Star2
<« S.J ^V
Kytfngu StUnldt.
KzSt
Cartel OtulMldi.
O»2 (•« te)
S*l«»tw Dtmldi,
S*,(MJ.)
T«ll«r1ua, Te
TtMwl*. TfZ
T«llnr1U. Ttlh->
(»*It) ^
T«Unr«U. TeOi
<« T.) "•
n«or1d( l«n. r
Kr*«9«i nuorldi.
MIC
in
•*•*(»•}
l.» • W* (0.1)
I
•
•
•
I
•
1.0 • UP
t.l • U*
l.t 1 10* (U)
t.O « Id4 (20)
4.4 » 10s
2.» x 102
Z.O I U*
2.0 « 102
2.« I 10*
2.« « 10*
2.« i 10* (.OS)
2.u « 102
2.0 i 102
1.0 « ID2
1.0 X Vt
1.0 x 102
1.0 i ID2
2.S > 103
2.8 x 1fr>
HME
MTU
NULTN
D/A
R
I.S > 10*
2.0 . 10s
2.3 i 10*
*.0 x 10s
IV*
5.0 x 10>
5.0 x 10'
(.0 x 10'
$.0 > 10*
$.0 X I01
S.O I 10'
(»sSe>
S.O > !0>
S.O x I01
I.S x 103
I.S x 103
I.S x 10>
I.S x 10]
3.8 x 10*
3.0 I 10*
HOT
MTU
•*n
(COUKT
VA
H
4.S x 102
•
I.Ox 10>
1.0 x 10*
VA
2.5 i 101
2.S x 10'
2.S x 101
2.S i 10*
2.5 x I01
2.S x 10'
(atSe)
2.S x 10<
2.5 > 101
N
1
N
I
II
11
MK
IAW
N^f.
K/A
•
1.0 I 10*
4.0 i 102
N/A
N/A
N/A
1.0 x 10-1
1.0 i 10-<
1.0 i 10*'
i.o i i 10
3.0 i 10
3.0 i 10
7.5 x 101
IVA
NftTE
1MB
tcouwr
K/A
•
t.O i I02
N
K/A
V*
R/A
S.O i 10-2
s.o x ir2
S.O x 1C"2
S.O x 10~2
s.o x ir2
S.O I 10-*
UiSt)
5.0 i to-2
S.O x 10-*
H
N
K
N
N
NA
sy
'.Ti
i.O.
Z.blO'
R.O.
R.D.
H.D.
H.D.
R.O.
7.S
«S.S
R.D.
R.O.
MTIO
s*mt
««
•
0.04
UML 2
uquiuo
»-»ts
H'KO
KO
w
TISI .
MTNOO'
TtST
tirec-
TATIONS2
TEST
COST'
SMf\C.
M.1QUOT4
TABlt UV:
I. TEST HETHOO
1. S1ANOMO
2. OEVEIOP-
KRTAL
3. UNKMUN
A. AAS
B. IRO
C. WEI
CHEMICAL
0. ESCA
E. GS/HS
2. EXKCTEO 1E5T
SUCCESS
1. HICK
2. HOOKA!E
3. IMXROUN
3. TEST COST
I. REASONABLE
2. MODERATE
3. HIGH
4. SAM>U ALIQUOT
1. ADEQUATE
2. MARGINAL
3. INADEQUATE
4. REUHHE
•ttai *f S-2-S. S-2-« and S-2-7
R.O. Kot Octeratned
H Ho Valw
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data. From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
'_
til. OUHK
SO. MMM
it. mam.
00. S00MVI
H. rrmm
a. froww
u. iinm*
M. MtflMM
65. MMMM
C6WOMD
CMwMt tan. (!-
JMKMoritt.
IfeMritt. tWf
Oter*U. CM}
CkMrtat Otexl*.
CM*
Cwtaqrl OlorWt
•jlrBxai OUrldt.
Oral* It*, or
Orart* It*. lr-
y**" •«•«*.
MMl !«•. 1-
Sct*4l«. Sc
SoMliti It*. Se"
mrte tai,,r*J
tttMtaB. 11
TltMM. It*'
(IT.)
TltWlC. Tl<4
<« TO
TltMlM Otext*.
TIO*(«TI)
&r*- •-
tlro»«« Mm«*.
1H>2 (M Zr)
Htt*1m to*. Hf**
fM«1«l. *
Etomtal
VMMdlMi. T
fMMtflc. T" (M T)
fnu4>l. Vo'Z
««ir)
OrtknvudtU.
»er* («» »)
mn
H/^'fwrt
I
I
•
1
• :
4.0 I 10*
1.0 I 1C1
I
•
1.0 I 10*
1
f.l X 10*
1.1 • 10*
1.0 i ID3
f.O I 103
f.O « 101
*.0 » I03
(.0 ii 101
(.0 * 101
f.O « W>
»,0 I 10*
5.0 i 10?
(.0 « 10?
S.O x 10*
S.O i 101
S.O « 102
Mil
mm
<£{*
1.1 I 10*
1
•
•
•
1.0 1 10s
1.1 x U0
1
II
I.S x 10s
II
S.O « 10
0.0 x 10
I.S I 10*
f.O > 10*
t.O X 10*
i.o i io«
1.0 x 10*
7.S x 10*
;.» x 10*
/.S x 10*
I.S i 103
Z.S i 10'
2.S « 10*
Z.S > 10>
Z.5 x 103
MV£
•no
«£&
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
I
1
•
I
•
1
1
O.Zx MZ
iU»ih)
».Z x Mft
o.r i M?
8.1 i to'
0
0
1
I.S I 19*
i.s i 10*
I.S • I0>
I.S I M2
1.5 I 10?
not
T
An
Z.«x I03
II
1
•
•
V*
I/A
II
1
M
I
I.O x 10-*
1.0 x 10-'
3.0 i 10'
1.0 x 10^
1.0 i 10*
I.Ox.10?
1.0 x W*
I.S i 10*
I.S i 10'
I.S < 10
S.O i 10
S.O > 10
S.O I 10
S.O i 10
S.O I 10
MTE
IMO
«£&
•
•
•
•
•
M
V*
II
II
V*
M
1
II
1
!.* x 10
l.t x 10
l.« « 10
l.f x 10
i
•
i
3.0 x tO*1
J.O I 10-'
J.O I 10-'
3.0 • 10-'
1.0 II 10-'
IMU
i
iW
1.0.
1.0.
10.«
1.0.
1 fljg
LfeMi
I.MO*
t.7x!0*
I.S.101
Lf>10
Ifclff3
OUTIO
w
I
1
1
O.OS
4.S
.0.7
U.t
inru z
nqviKO
T.TB
IHD
TH
tts
TB
n
res
TtST ,
wim1
14
I-C
i-t
l-A
nsi
OKC-,
MTIOKS*
Z
,
1
j
TEit,
COST3
1
1
1
1
SMftt.
ALIQUOT*
Z
1
Z
1
THOU ttT:
TBTI
I. STM
z. ornior-
POIAl
J.
A. AAS
i. no
C. KT
0. ESCA
C. 4C/W
KPCC1EO TEST
SUCttSS:
t. mcN
Z. KHM1E
1.
TOT COST
I. KASOMW.E
Z. MOHATE
3. DIB)
SAMPLE
I. AKqUATE
Z. MKIWL
}. INUCqiMtt
«. MSAWIE
Swrntlm of S-Z-5. S-2-6. *nd S-Z-7
D.O. Not
X No Tilut
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-Inch FBC Unit* (Continued)
VI
uaimn
ct. MMIIM
47. TAHTAittl
tt. OMNIIM
CQHKUB
NtUvwdiU. Wj-
(« ») ^
Vamtfyltc. W*J
(«•»)
«w*i)ly> Mould*.
»<«»)
««u4lM Trlulde.
Wj (« »)
IfMtflM Tttra-
•»<*. V204. (« V)
VaMtflM Pnrt-
0.1*. »,0s (n V)
VtMdlia Urttdt.
VC (is »)
Vwudlui Noao-
lulflde. »S (it »)
(Mtdlun Uttrlde,
«N («I V)
feiudyl SulflU.
TO504 SHyO (.5 »)
Ntofeu. Nb'J
llotoic. •>**
NloblwOiiiln.
«bO, Hb?U, (« M>)
Untllu* Ion,
t***
Chrofttut, Cr
Chruws. Cr*2
(« Cr)
Chmile. Cr**
(« Cr)
Uirowtt:, CrCU-*
(« Cr)
Ckrt»it», CrzOj"2
(« Cr) '
OichrntUs.
CrjOy^tii Cr)
Chroctui Cirbonyl ,
Cr(CO)6 (» Cr)
Chrotlui Suiridt,
CrZS3
Chronic 0>ldc.
Crz03 (t( Cr)
ChrtMilte Mlntrtl,
FcO CrjO) (is Cr)
HME
MR
««/•! (pp.)
S.O * 10*
S.O i \&
i.O x I02
S.O « 10*
S.O » 102
S.D « ID2
S.O i 102
s.o > to?
S.O i 102
S.O i 102
Z.2 < 10*
1. 1 « Iff*
2.2 < 104
5.0 > I03
1.0 « 10
1.0 x 10
1.0 > 10
1.0 i 10
1.0 « 10
1.0 » 10
1.0 > 10
1.0 « 10
1.0 « 10
1.0 > 10
MTf
wr»
^
*.i • 10*
Z.i I 10*
Z.S » 101
J.i > 10J
2 i < 10J
Z.S « 10*
J i i 10*
Z.i i 101
i S i 101
IS > 101
1 3 . 10s
i 1 i 10*
J.J « 103
7 i < 10*
? 5 < 1C2
? 5 > to?
> i > I02
j.5 « i«2
>. I i .10?
i 2.S » I02
2.S i 102
J S « I02
' 2.i « 102
25 < |t>2
mn
MTCI
»«/i
ccotocv
l.S « 102
1.S i 102
l.S > 102
l.S » 102
l.S < tO2*
l.S » ID2
l.S « 102
l.S « 10?
l.S > 102
l.S > 102
N
N
N
N
2.S « I02
2.S « I02
2.S < I02
2.S > 102
2.S » I02
2.S > 10?
2.S « 102
2.5 > 102
2.5 « 102
2.5 > 102
MTE
IAW
WM.TH
S.O > 10
S.O I 10
S.O 1 10
S.O I 10
S.O < 10
S.O K 10
s.o i 10
5.0 x 10
S.O x 10
S.O ic 10
6.5 i 102
(.S » 10?
6.S « I02
1 .5 I I02
5.0 « 10-'
5.0 i 10-1
50 K lO'1
S.O i 10"1
S.O i 10-1
S.O x 10-1
5.0 » 10-1
5.0 « 10-*
5.0 » 10-1
S.O > 10-1
mit
IAW
rtH
ccotocr
1.0 i 10-'
1.0 I IS-1
1.0 > 10-'
J.O « 10-1
1.0 * 10-'
1.0 i 10-'
J.O i 10-1
3.0 > 10-1
J.O i 10-1
1.0 i 10-1
II
•
II
•
s.o • 10-'
S.O i 10-1
S.O « 10'1
S.O i Id-'
s.o K 10-1
S.O x 10-1
S.O i 10-1
s.o i 10-1
5.0 > 10"'
4.0 » 10-1
SAWLE
»
(»•>
*/»
«.6ilO
3.7(10
2.U103
N.D.
RAItO
SAHPU
mrr
210
(.int. 2
Kguiuo
T'ttS
•MB
•>
«
ns
IISI
KTHOQ)
l-C -
TEST
EIPEC-..
TATICNS2
1
TEST
COST'
i
swnt.
Aiiquor
i
TMU KfT
. TtST NEIMOO
1. STAMMM
2. OtVflOP-
KltTM.
3. MKMMI
A. AAS
B. IRO
C. MET
CHtHICAl
D. £SCA
C. 6C/KS
«P£C1ED TfSI
SUCCESS.
1. HIGH
2. MOOERMC
3. UNMMUH
TEST COST
1. RCASOIMBU
2. MOKMTE
3. HIGH
SAMPLE ALIQUOT
I. ADEQUATE
2. WRGIIMl
3. INMXQUCt
4. RtSAWll
S-2-5. 5-2-6. tnd S-2-7
N.D. Not
N No Vain*
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Continued)
cr>
CATtOMT
M. lOltMIN
70. TWKSTEN
71. NMHKU
n. MOB
OMPOUNO
Nydran Cfcralwi
ttotoiuu. CH>04
DtjO (•> Cr)
Ira Cknxvu,
FKiO« (n Cr)
NllyMnui. (to
(toljMOKMI. *>42
UriyMlc. !*>»)
MBlyMiU. IMr*
(•»*)
feljrtKfcfflji Sulftitc,
MS: Us tt>)
flDlyMem trloildf,
NoOj (« *>)
Twifttm, H
SWWrSk
TMfttOT Oltuirt*.
»I U» v)
Kolfra.lt* Nlnertl,
r«M4-IMA4 (it V)
HMigmu. m
NMgrau*. Hn*?
M»«n1c, *>'J
rtnmoiiwt*. IM4-
(MthT
NMojimn Oittft,
MO (« Nl)
Nv^mt* Moil*.
H«I (II M}
MM(iim« Cartorctc,
"tWj (« Hi)
BIII|««»»I Svlfttt,
»*>5S (n HI)
MMfMCM SvlridO,
»M2 (.1 m)
Iron C«rtxn>1i.
imp'*-
rtrrem, rt«?
ftfrU. F»«J
rorrwi Oildt, FcO
miE
tin
»9/«3 (ppn)
1.0 » 10
1.0 i 10
S.O < 1(P
5.0 « 103
S.O i ICJ
5.0 > 101
S.O > 10'
S.O I 103
1.0 « ICP
N
1.0 > 103
1.0 > 103
S.O I 10}
S.O > 103
S.O « I0l
S.O « 10>
s.o i 10*
S.O > 103
S.O » I01
S.O > 103
S.O > 10)
7.0 i 10?
1.0 « M*
1.0 i W)
S.O i 10)
MATE
HAttd
uf/l
HtMLTH
Z.S « 10*
? 5 . 10?
7.S « 10*
7.S « 10«
7.S > 10*"
7.$ « 10*
7.5 I 10*
7.5 « 10*
1.5 « 10*
N
1.5 * 10*
I.S < 10*
t.S » 10*
Z.S » 10?
;.s « ID?
2.5 « 10*
1.5 x 10*
I.S i 10?
2.5 > 102
2.5 • 10*
2.5 » 10?
1.1. « 10*
I.S I I0>
1.5 > 10>
7.5 » 10*
MIC
MATCH
,7/1
tcotoer
2.5 i 10*
2.S i 10?
7.0 > IIP
7.0 i If
7.0 > 10)
7.0 I I0>
7.0 i 10)
7.0 » 101
K
II
N
II
1.0 » 10*
1.0 i 10?
1.0 x 102
1.0 I ID?
1.0 > 10?
1.0 « 10?
1.0 > 10?
1.0 l 19?
1.0 i 10?
N
2.5 • 10*
2.5 • 10?
II
mu
DUO
H^?H
5.0 > 10-'
5.0 i 10-'
1.5 » 10?
1.5 > 102
1.5 « 10?
1.5 « 10?
1.5 » 10?
1.5 > 10?
3.0 x 101
II
1.0 x 10<
3.0 i 10*
S.O x 10-'
5.0 x 10-1
S.O'x 10-1
5.0 i 10-'
5.0 i 10-'
5.0 i 10-1
5.0 x 10-1
5.0 i 10-'
5.0 x 10-1
2.1 I 101
3.0 i 10
3.0 I 10
1.5 I 10?
mu
LAW
111
ECOHKT
5.0 > 10-'
5.0 t 10-'
1.4 i 10"
M i 101
1.4 i 10>
1.4 < 10>
1.4 » 10'
1.4 i I01
N
N
N
II
2.0 I 10-*
2.0 I 10-1
2.0 x 10-1
2.0 i 10-1
2.0 i «H
2.0 x 10-'
2.0 i 10-'
2.0 i 10-1
2.0 i 10-'
*
5.0 i 10-'
5.0 i 10-'
N
SNflE
Hi*?.
IPP")'
»»/1
J.7XI02
i x 10
3.8x10*
N.O.
1 1,m*
RATIO
w
0.07
(.7*
4!l
ICttl 2
•EOOIBtD
T-ttS
N-NO
NO
NO
m
tH
TEST
W1H001
1-A
14
TCST
t«PfC-
TATIONS?
I
1
TEST
COST)
i
i
SAKPIE.
Aiiuuor
i
i
*SMMt)M of S-2-S, 5-2-6, «n« 5-2-7 ».0. Not OtUntiml
ft No »i1u«
TA81E WT:
TCST WTHOO
I. STAHOMO
2. DEniOP-
KNTAI
3.
A. MS
I. XRO
C. «T
OKMICAl
0. ESCA
C. GC/W
EXPECTED TCST
SUCCESS:
1. HIGH
2. HOOCUTC
3. IMBOWI
, TEST COST
I. RCASOMUC
2. NIOCMTE
1. HIGH'
. SNftt Aliquot
I. AKQWtE
2. NM61NAI
3. IHUtquATC
4. KSAIflC
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-Inch FBC Unit* (Continued)
74. COM.T
n. uoa
MfKtIU.
5Rtz«i
•3SSF*'
ssarr-
ftfricteMt. f«Z«>j
toric%*wU»
C%*iuO
f%*zO
lra» MfUts. F«S.
f«Z*3
rjrrfU. f«Sz
MUttta Ira* 5111-
c«U. Ptit;Ct
Mtata Im. »»»1
unit. to
toteltM*. to4*
totolttc, to»3
totaltM CMtouU.
M*****. CoCOj-ltiO
(•> c*>
toWIt CutMt.
to* (M to)
tok*tt S.H14M. to*
tofS] (is to)
fatelt toitnlc
S»lft*. CoAiS
<*»e»)
bk*1t Arvoil*.
Ubj (» te)
Ckktlt Cirtwyl .
b(0)4 (« to)
tokiltau telde.
bB(«t to)
totoltim Hjdrailite
Utah uT to)
•trttlmii if
Mcttllc. ««3
McteMM SMirite.
Mttat AnoiMe.
life (M «)
NMt
P^(W-)
».J 1 Ml
•
•
I
•
•
•
•
S.« « »'
i.i « M1
$.0 » W<
S.» x I0>
i.t i M<
S.» • U1
4.8 i 10>
S.t i 10*
s.a • to1
».• » ID1
I.* > W1
l_.t i 10
1.1 i !«'
l.S « 10'
t.S x 101
l.S x 10'
HOI
•un
.f™
•.2 * Ml
•
•
•
I
•
•
1
7.5 i 10*
7.S i 10*
7.S t 10*
».» i 10*
».S a M*
7.S « Ml1
7.S i 10*
7.S i 10*
7.5 « 10*
l.S a 10*
7.S i M*
KS i IOL
t.3 M IP*
J.j i 10*
2.3 » 10*
1.3 « 10*
mn
wra
oaoor
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
2.S » 10*
l.S > U*
l.S x ID*
Z.S a 10*
l.S x 10*
Z.S x 10*
Z.S « 10*
Z.S x 10*
Z.S x 10*
Z.S x 10*
Z.S x 10*
It
1.0 I 10'
1.0 x 10*
1.0 x 10>
1.0 x 10'
mn
1MB
M/t
NULIM
3.1 a 10'
I
I
1
I
I
•
I
l.S x 10
l.S x 10
l.S x 10
l.S x 10
l.S x 10
l.S x 10
l.S x 10
l.S x 10
l.S x 10
l.S x 10
l.S x 10
3.0 x 10-'
4.5 x 10"'
4.S x 10-1
4.S x 10-'
4 .5 x 10-'
mil
UM
lauaa
•
•
•
•
•
•
2 0 x M^
•
_
5.0 i 10-1
S.I x M-l
S.O x W1
S.O x KT1
S.O x 10-'
S.O i 10-1
S.O i 10-1
S.O i 10-'
S.O » 10-1
S.O i 10- 1
S.O x ir'
1
Z.O x IP"*
2.0 i 10-*
Z.O x 10-*
35*
5?!
«? ..
i.«ao*
1.0.
^-''10^
Uxlfl?
Ml 10
ymt
mn
*
3.1
_a —
zso
inn z
it (pitta
T-ns
•••
IB
_ns
rts —
nsf
(OHIO)1
l-C
i-c
TIST
UKC-.
TAT10NS*
1
I --
mi
cos?3
i
I
SMM.C
M.iquoi4
1 -
TMLE KCT
1EST WTHOO
1. STANDARD
2. KWLOP-
MMTAL
3. IMKMM
A. AAS
I. IM)
C. MU
CWNICAl
0. ElU
C. SC/KS
ttrtCTtP TES1
SUCCESS:
I. HICN
2. WCCRAIf
3.
US! COST
I. RCASONABIE
2. KWCMH
3. HI6H
SAUtt All QUO I
I. AOCQOAIC
2. HMIGIIM1
3. IIWOtqiMTi:
4. KCSAMtt
tai rf S-Z-S. S-2-i Md S-Z-7 ».0. «rt DctanilMd
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-Inch FBC Unit* (Continued)
00
CntOKT
77. nanm
TO. own
70. SlUtk
00. OKI
n. znc
(VODUNO
itcxti oxi«t. mo
•MB) AnttKMl*.
TH» (M Rt)
Mctel Annie S«1-
fW*. MM (M 11 )
•Mat Ortonyl.
MICfe
n "*'
t**r
faynni. Co*
Cxfrle. €•«*
srrr^S)1*'
tS^^tJr* **•
tu»Mi SvlftU,
5sSr<« «.)
tanr MfMn, CvS,
eSSTtJTelT**'
Sco?«Uo!oruI'e.)
CMtcanrrlt*
Muni, C*tSz
Sit*«>, A«
fii'C)"^ ***
OW-
Sttw , AfC*
SllwSoiru*,
ABSU.A.)
ftaMDtxl 0014
Ztae. Zn
ClfMRUI ZtHC. Z*
Hue Iw. !•**
Zinc 0x14*. ZnO
(nZ*)
mn
I.S M I01
I.S ii I*1
I.S t 101
4.3 • 10>
t.O x 10
t.O « 10*
2.0 x 10*
t.O x 10*
Z.O x 10*
Z.O x W*
t.S x 10*
t.0 x 10*
*
1.0 x 10*
*
1.0 X W'
i.o « tot
i.o * to1
1.0 x 10'
t.o * to'
1
4.0 x 10*
4.0 I !0>
4.0 I to3
4.0 x 103
mn
HATH
7.3 * 10*
7.J < 10*
t.3 • 10*
S.S i 10*
3.0 x to1
S.O i 103
S.O x 10)
S.O i 103
S.O i W0
S.O x *S3
S.O i M3
S.O « 103
S.O X 101
S.O * 103
. »
I.S x 10*
t.s x tor
t.» i lOt
t.S I (49
I.S » IO*
|
t.S i W«
t.S I U*
t.S i N4
t.S i M*
MTEI
ECOLOST
I.O i IO1
t.a « 10'
t.o > to'
t.O I
(n 11
II
e1
S.O x 10*
S.O x 10'
S.O I »t
S.O x I0>
S.O x »l
S.O I 10'
S.O I 10t
s.e x tot
S.O x tOt
*
S.O 1 10
S.O 1 10
s.o t to
S.O 1 W
S.O x 10
1
1.0 » 10*
I.O « 10*
1.0 > 10*
t.O > 10*
MTt
LAW
4.S « 10-1
4.5 x 10-'
4.S i ID"1
1.0 i 10
s.o « 10-*
1.0 i 10'
t.O x 10'
1.0 I IO1
1.0 x 10'
1.0 x 10'
1.0 i 10'
t.O x 10'
1.0 x tot
1.0 i 10t
* ' •
S.O I 10-1-
0.0 X W>
s.o * to-'
i.o « to-'
s.o « to-1
It
S.O « IO1
S.O x 10'
S.O i 10'
s.o » 10'
•n
LAW
craioct
7.0 i W-*
Z.O i 10-?
7.0 i 10-*
7.0 > tO->
1
1.0 i M-'
I.Ox 10-1
1.0 I W-t
1.0 * »•'
1.0 i M-S
I.O x W1
I.Ox 10-'
1.0 • 10-»
I.Ox W-t
0
1.0 x W-l
1.0 * W-*
».OxlO-t
t.o > w-t
1.0 x 10-t
1
t.o • to-'
t.O l W-»
t.o • •*•'
t.O i W'
Hf&
».9.
-------
Table 2-2. Total Emission Data From 6-1nch FBC Unit* (Concluded)
CnUDMT
B. CMWM
n. NEKun
M. CEMW
K. OMNIUM
M. THODIIM
C»VCM>
Itac Mtati. Zcttt
<«*)
Itac S*UMt. US
(«B>)
CrtBhB. U
Oxautil CkMw,
U
C*M« te. C4*»
CtMM III ft*. C4S
(MC4)
C*M« Oil*. UO
(MM)
HMCiXfj* Hf
rUxMUl Ibrcwry* Hf
MrcOTMH, Mjz**
Nrraric. Hj*+
Nnortc Siilfl*.
IKS
tfemrk Cklorltft.
"gen
w-*
Ctrl.*. Ct (O+J,
C**«. UzOj)
PriuatfyBtw, Pr
(Ml)
S»irt«. S* (S«")
UntkMu*. U
NfOdjBlWI, Nd (Nd*3)
Urwtw. U (UH)
Thorlui, Th (Th»*J
mn
rt/-5'(w>
4.0 • I0>
4.0 • 1ft3
1.0 « 10»
1.0 *. I01
1.0 « I0l
1.0 « 10<
1.0 1 U1
f.O X U<
i.O « 10>
S.O i 101
S.O ii 10l
5.0 ii Iftl
S.O ll 10>
*.3 x 103
3.7 x JO*
S.I > Id4
5.3 x 10*
1.1 x 10s
N
9.0 x 10
4.Z > 102
NOT
nan
J3&
t.i x !•«
M i 104
l.i x 101
1.0 x 10>
S.O i 10'
S.O x 10'
S.O x 10<
1.0 I 10"
1.4 x 10'
1.4 x tot
I.I i 10"
1.0 • W1
1.0 i 10>
2.) i IflS
S.S i 10*
M i 10*
r;.» » 10*
1.7 > 10*
N
^8.9 » 10*
(.3 i 103
mm
•mi
«j&
1.0 « M*
1.0 I 10*
1.0 i 10
1.0 x K>
1 .0 B U
1.0 x 10
1.0 X M
Z.S x 102
2.1 x 102
Z.S x 10*
Z.S x 102
Z.S x 10*
Z.S x 10?
1
N
N
M
*
II
s,o i 10*
N
mir
1MB
NEfclH
1.0 I 10»
S.O i 101
1.0 X 10-'
1.0 x 10-1
i.o i ir'
1.0 i 10-1
1.0 x 10-1
Z.O I 10-2
Z.O > 10-*
Z.O > 10-*
Z.O* 10-2
Z.O i 10-*
Z.O > 10-*
4.( « 10Z
1.1 > 10*
l.S i 103
1.6 « 10)
3.4 x 10)
II
l.Z > 102
1.3 i 10
nm
uw>
(i&T
t.O x 10*1
2.0 x 10-1
Z.O x 10-)
Z.O I 10-)
Z.O x 10-)
Z.O x 10-)
Z.O x 10-)
S.O x 10-1
S.O x 10-1
S.O x 10-1
S.O x 10-1
S.O • 10-1
5.0 > 10-1
N
N
N
N
N
N
1.0 I 10
N
3?
ri
<« » U
1 HO
l.tilO3
6.4«10
1.6X102
MTU
W
t
p.?
0.04
0.7
0.39
LML 2
KOUIKO
1-113
TO
»
•>
''
ns
its
TCSI
METHOD1
1-A
1-C
1-C
TCT
U«C-.
UTIOK'
1
1
1
HST
COST3
1
1
1
•SAHPlt.
M.IQUOT4
1
1
1
TMU ITI:
nsi
i.
2.
taut.
i. •aw
A. M5
0. ••
C. M?
o. isa
E.
SUCttSS:
I. 110
Z. HKJMIE
TUT OH1
i. tuiimmt
2. MUMIE
3. R1SM
«.iquot
2. IWKIIMi.
3. ilMtquXT
4. USAIVLE
tlon of S-2-S. S-2-4 ud 5-2-7
N.D. Not
N Ha
-------
Table 3-3. Atomic Absorption Analytical Operating Parameters
Element
Analytical . Background S11t Atomlzatlon
wavelength, A Wavelength. A Width. A Source
Analytical Procedure
Ag
Cu
N1
3281
3247
2320
3235 (Ne)
None
2316
10
10
G.F.«
G.F.<
G,F.<
Dry - 30 sec. 9 200°C
Ash - 60 sec. 9 400°C
Atomize - 7 sec. 9 2300°C -
Argon Gas
Dry - 30 sec. 9 200°c
Ash - 60 sec. 9 600°C
Atomize -6 sec. 9 2500° C -
Argon Gas
Dry - 20 sec. 9 200°C
Ash - 30 sec. 9 800°C „
Atomize -6 sec. 9 2800°C -
Argon Gas
Li
Mg
Pb
Zn
Cd
Be
Cr
Pt
V
S1
Sr
6708
2852
2833
2139
2288
2349
3579
2659
3185
2516
4607
None
None
2825
None
None
None
None
Continuum
3196
None
None
2
4
4
4
.. 4 . .:
4
4
4
2
2
2
A1r-CJi2 Atomic Emission
Alr-C.H. Atomic Absorption
G.F.* Ory -40 sec. 9 200°C
Ash - 40 sec. 9 600°C „
Atomize - 6 sec. 9 1900°C
10^1 1.0* tWO? S 0.2%
(NH.)Jto7024 added In furnace
A1r-C?H? Atomic Absorption
Alr-C-H. Atomic Absorption
N?0-C.H? Atomic Absorption
A1r-C2H2 Atomic Absorption
G.F.* Ory - 30 sec. 9 300°C
Ash - 30 sec. 9 1150°C „
Atomize - 5 sec. 9 2700°C -
Argon Gas
6.F.* Dry - 30 sec. 9 200°C
Ash - 40 sec. 9 1COO°C „
Atomize -5 sec. 9 2800°C -
Argon Gas
N-O-C-H. Atomic Absorption
A1r-C-H- Atomic Emission
Graphite furnace.
1-120
-------
Table 3-4. Atomic Absorption Partlculate Analysis (yg/g) Results
Elements
Sample 1
S-2-3
S-2-4
S-2-5
S-2-6
S-2-7-2
S-2-7-3
Weight (g)
0.0623
0.0638
0.0677
0.0957
0.0163
0.0138
Li
13
26
72
31
74
76
A,1
12
N.D.
N.D.
21
N.D.
N.D.
Cr
76
204
316
418
756
538
Mg
5,950
10,552
5,365
3,456
7,779
6,884
Zn
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
360
N.D.
N.D.
Cd
8.0
15.7
<4
<3
31
<18
Be
N.D.
N.D.
N.D.
<5
N.D.
N.D.
Pb
52
314
<4
167
1,194
58
V
48
180
370
104
491
580
SI
<4,020
4,700
111,000
679,000
178,000
138,000
Sr
1092
N.D.
N.D.
762
N.D.
N.D.
Blank value higher than samples. Values reported not corrected for any blank.
N.D. - not determined. Based on MATE values these elements were not required 1n the Level 2 effort.
-------
Table 3-5. Atomic Absorption Leachate Solution Analysis (rag/1) Result
Solution
A,
U V * Cu IN
«
MBS-A ..0. < 0.005 M.D. «0.0005 0.095 0.08 M.D. <0.02 1.0. <0.01 M.D. <0.01 0.0003 M.D. <0.01 M.O. <0.05 75 0.70
S-2-1-A M.0.< 0.005 0.0014 0.007 0.14 0.24 M.D. <0.01 0.03 N.O. <0.0002 I.D. «.« •.».
-------
Table 3-6. Percent Recovery of Spiked Samples
by Atomic Absorption
Solutions
leachates
Element
Zn
Mg
Ag
N1
L1
Cu
Cd
Be
Cr
Pb
Pt
V
S1
Hg
Sr
Add
104
-
80
60
104
80
-
100
-
105, 97
100
113
96
100
75
Basic
105
-
80
110
103
80
-
100
-
93
64
107
122
100
80
Participate
-
95
78
-
-
-
110
100
84
130, 84
-
116
107
102
106
1-123
-------
Table 3-8. ICPOES Recovery fesults
Average
re K Hg Hn AT B Ba Ca Cu Cd Co Cr Mo N1 Recovery
Acidic
Leachates 94'05 98'4 ^^ 93'° M-9 100'3 103-° 96-5 **.$ 91.1 96.6 97.7 94.5 97.2 96.1
Basic
Leachates 74'1* 102>0 95'2 94-3 ^^ w-0 112-° 104.3 97.4 96.7 96.3 92.7 94.2 105.1 96.7
ro
4k
Fe(OH)3 was observed as a precipitate.
-------
The following photomicrographs were pictured in the report:
FBC samples S-2-4 and S-2-5
Representative Appearance of FBC Sample S-2-6 (42x)
Representative Appearance of and Unusually Large Yellow Particle Seen in
Sample S-2-7
Size Variation of Agglomerates Observed in Sample S-2-7.
The following SEM photomicrographs were pictured in the document:
SEM at 3000X of Sample S-2-3 SEM at 3000X of Sample S-2-4
SEM at 3000X of Sample S-2-5 SEM at 3000X of Sample S-2-6
SEM at 3000X and 6000X of Sample S-2-7
The following EPMA photomicrographs were pictured in the document:
EPMA of Sample S-2-3 EPMA of Sample S-2-4
EPMA of Sample S-2-5 EPMA of Sample S-2-6
EPMA of Sample S-2-7 TEM/SAED Analysis of Sample S-2-3
TEM/SAED Analysis of Sample S-2-4 TEM/SAED Analysis of Sample S-2-5
TEM/SAED Analysis of S-2-6 TEM/SAED Analysis of S-2-7
1-125
-------
STUDY NUMBER 2
DATA
SOURCE:
PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT OF THE
LIGNITE-FIRED CAFB
DATA
STATUS:
EPA-600/7-79-048, February 1979
AUTHORS:
CONTRACTOR:
A. S. Warner, C. W. Young.
William Piispanen, and B. M. Myatt
GCA Corporation
GCA/Technology Division
Bedford, Massachusetts 01730
PROJECT
OFFICER:
Samuel L. Rakes
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
2-1
-------
PRELIMINARY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT OF THE LIGNITE-FIRED CAFB
The chemically active fluid bed (CAFB) is a process in which "oil or
coal is fed continuously into a fluidized bed of limestone maintained at 850
±70° C by preheated substoichiometric air. In this gasification unit fuel
is successively vaporized, oxidized, cracked, and reduced. Sulfur in the
fuel forms various gaseous species which in turn react with the bed stone to
form calcium sulfide-coated lime. Some of the fuel-bound trace elements are
also bound to the lime particles. The low-Btu, low-sulfur product gas
generated in the gasifier is passed through cyclones to a conventional
natural gas boiler where it undergoes combustion. The sulfided stone left
in the gasifier is cycled to a regenerator unit where it is oxidized to
produce lime which is returned to the gasifier and sulfur dioxide which is
sent to a sulfur recovery unit." Figure 2-1 (from the document) is a unit
operations flow diagram of the 2.93-MW pilot plant CAFB at the ESSO Research
Centre in Abingdon, England, where this testing was performed.
This study, conducted from January 24 through January 27,*1978, focused
on gaseous emissions from lignite combustion in the Abingdon CAFB. An
earlier study8 by the same contractor at this location focused on oil com-
bustion. The goals of this study were stated as:
1. Evaluation of the potential environmental impact of a lignite-
fired CAFB,
2. Identification of additional control needs,
3. Recommendations for Level 2 testing, and
4. Updating of cost information on the CAFB and on alternative technol
ogies.
8Werner, A. S., C. W. Young, M. I. Bornstein, R. M. Bradway, M. T. Mills,
and 0. F. Durocher. Preliminary Environmental Assessment of the CAFB.
GCA/Technology Division, Bedford, Massachusetts. Prepared for the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
Publication No. EPA-600/7-76-017. October 1976. 324 pp. (NTIS No. PB
262-001/AS).
2-2
-------
oo
LIGNITE
FEED
SYSTEM
X SOLIDS
EFFICIENCY I
CYCLONE -T 1
Ta* |_J
[OIL STORAGE
INC
OASIFIER AIR BLOWERS
Figure 2-1. Unit operations flow diagram of the ESSO pilot plant.
-------
The Ablngdon CAFB is at present the only operating CAFB. A 10-MW
retrofit demonstration plant is being constructed at La Raima Power Station
in San Benito, Texas. Comparisons between oil-firing and coal-firing (lignite-
firing) processes and between potential emissions at the two plants are
thoroughly discussed in this document. In comparison with lignite-fired
CAFB runs, oil-fired runs contained more sulfur, sodium, and vanadium and
no detectable aluminum or silicon; these differences were attributed to
differences in the fuel composition. Organic emissions varied widely as a
function of gasifier operating conditions and were not easily correlated
with fuel type.
Comparisons between the CAFB and conventional coal/lignite-fired boilers
are also presented. The Source Analysis Model, SAM/1A, is used to compare
the various technologies. Participate emissions were about three times
lower for lignite-fired CAFB than for conventional lignite-fired boilers
using multicyclones; however, a conventional lignite-fired boiler with an
ESP had lower particulate emissions by a factor of about 2,000. Inorganic
analyses of stack gases supported the theory that the CAFB limestone bed
material adsorbs trace metals. CAFB gaseous C1-C6 organic emissions were
equivalent to those from conventional systems and greater than C6 organic
emissions from CAFBs were lower; CAFB S02 and NO emissions were also lower.
Appendix A of the final report presents a cost/benefits analysis of
three pollution reduction technologies: CAFB, hydrodesulfurization (HOS),
and flue gas desulfurization (FGD). CAFB appears to be more efficient at
reducing HO and trace metals in emissions, but CAFB capital and operating
n.
costs are significantly higher.
This study used the Level 1 protocol. Additional sampling techniques
Included a modified RAC train (with particulate filter, Tenax-GC cartridge,
and thermostatically controlled water jacket) and in-stack Andersen impactors.
Additional measurement techniques included X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
(or ESCA) and Federal Register Method 8, performed for sulfur species because
the GC-FPD field system prescribed by Level 1 methodology was inoperative at
the time of these tests. Integrated bag sampling was used for Cj-Cg hydro-
carbons, fixed gases, and NO.
A
In addition to the gaseous emissions, samples were taken of lignite
feed, limestone feed, spent stone, gasifier bed material, and process cyclone
2-4
-------
catches. These solid samples were collected by plant personnel and provided
to the sampling crew. Table 2-1 (from the final report) lists the various
samples collected and analyses performed. All mercury analyses were by the
cold vapor atomic absorption (AA) method, sulfate analyses were by a turbidi-
metric procedure, and fluoride and chloride determinations were by specific
ion electrode.
This study compared results from the various sampling methods. The
SASS and RAC particulate loading values generally agreed within a factor of
three, although RAC values were consistently lower. An exception was the
arsenic measurement, in which the RAC values were lower by a factor of 20 to
40. The organic adsorption modules, using XAD-2 in the SASS and Tenax-GC in
the RAC, produced results that were qualitatively similar, although process
variations during sample collection prohibit quantitative comparisons. The
SASS and the Andersen impactors showed good agreement with regard to size
distribution.
Additional conclusions and recommendations from this study were:
1. Particulate emissions at this CAFB were 20 to 40 times higher than
the new source performance standards (NSPS) for coal-fired boilers,
and 10 to 30 percent of particulates were in the respirable range.
Better controls must be developed.
2. Fourteen elements were found at levels above their MATE values;
these were Ba, As, Ni, Cr, Ti, P, Si, Mg, B, Be, Cd, Sr, Cu, and
Li. A reduction in particulate emissions would also reduce emitted
levels of these elements.
3. NO emissions were well below the NSPS.
4. S02 emissions were roughly half the NSPS. Considering uncertainty
in measurements and variations in the efficiency of the CAFB to
remove sulfur, the process variables favoring sulfur removal
should be carefully studied and optimized.
2-5
-------
TABLE 2-1. LABORATORY ANALYSIS PLAN FOR CAFB-LIGNITE STUDY
Organic Analysis
SASS samples
Particulate
Resin (XAD-2)
Condensate
Rinses
RAG samples
Particulate. (composite of probe rinses; runs 1 to 5)
Tenax (runs 2 and 4)
Bulk samples
Spent solids
Inorganic Analysis
SASS samples
Particulate
Resin (XAD-2)
Condensate
Impingers
Rinses
RAC samples
Particulate (runs 1, 3, and 5)
Bulk samples
Lignite
Limestone
Spent solids
Cyclone fines
Gasifier bed
Surface Analysis
SASS samples
Particulate
RAC samples
Particulate
Impactor substrates
2-6
-------
LEVEL 1
2-7
-------
me 2*2. swart auttt MASS SPECTROSCOPY
mm fi, UN« CYCLONE
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
T»
Er
Ho
2.50
6.92
<2.15
29.58
<0.37
NR
<0.10
NR
<0.15
<0.16
<0.10
0.54
NR
<2.38
<0.96
<0.73
<0.29
<1.04
<0.20
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<2.77
<0.01
<1.38
0.50
2.88
6.53
1.96
15.37
21.51
318.86
0.92
1.23
<1.50
0.85
2.77
NR
0.73
NR
<1.61
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.30
<0.08
1.15
12.68
72.99
25.74
422. 59
8.84
38.42
<25.74
92.20
5.76
14.98
315.02
46.10
21.90
9.99
HC
922.01
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
C1
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
LI
19.21
42.26
3,034.96
NR
31,117.94
806.76
NR
MC
103.73
31,886.29
MC
2,266.62
422.59
NR
161.35
1.69
NR
MC = Major component of the sample.
NR = Not reported.
2-8
-------
TABLE 2-3. SPARK' SOURCE
RUN *1, 3-ym CYC40KE
wg/m3
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tn
Er
Ho
10.76
21.90
<18.44
53.78
<0.26
NR
<0.42
NR
<0.61
<0.69
<0.42
<1.61
NR
<4.99
<2.00
<2.11
<0.15
<0.46
<0.85
oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<2.54
<0.05
<0.25
<1.58
<6.15
13.83
4.61
32.65
46.10
806.76
1.46
<0.96
<1.84
2.57
5.76
NR
1.08
NR
<3.50
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
In
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.11
<0.34
3.07
27.66
207.45
38.42
1,152.52
19.21
61.47
<14.98
226.66
<18.06
65.31
261.24
35.73
92.20
15.37
18,440.26
384.17
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
28.04
107.57
3,841.72
NR
*
5,378.41
NR
9,988.47
806.76
*
21,513.64
8,067.61
3,419.13
NR
1,190.93
2.61
NR
NR = Not reported.
"Value exceeds 1 g.
2-9-
-------
TARE 2-4. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
RUNJ1. l-»* CYCLONE
)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tro
Er
Ho
3.34
13.45
<11.53
96.04
<0.42
NR
<0.50
NR
<0.77
<0,85
<0.54
<2.00
NR
<12.68
<2.42
<1.96
<0.18
<3.80
<0.73
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<4.
<0.
<1.
<1.
<7.
8.
2.
42.
115.
1,498.
0.
<0.
<3.
3.
4.
NR
1.
NR
<1.
99
06
96
31
68
45
80
26
25
27
92
29
84
03
99
04
46
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.
<0.
3.
34.
192.
49.
768.
16.
53.
<26.
280.
<11.
72.
203.
61.
80.
18.
13,446.
268.
13
42
03
19
09
94
34
90
78
12
45
53
99
61
47
68
82
02
92
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
•Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
38.
130.
4,994.
NR
*
3,803.
NR
17,287.
537.
30,349.
11,140.
3,611.
960.
NR
2,650.
9.
NR
42
62
24
30
74
84
60
99
22
43
79
22
NR - Not reported.
*Value exceeds 1 g.
2-10
-------
«***!€*, OWTCH
•3
u
Th
Bi
Pb
TV
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
0.33
0.46
0.54
4.61
<0.15
NR
<0.01
NR
<0.01
<0.01
<0.01
<0.12
NR
<0.13
<0.01
<0.08
<0.02
<0.08
0.02
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.16
<3.84 (-03)
<0.10
0.04
0.18
0.50
0.15
2.31
1.27
13.45
0.12
<0.01
<0.20
0.19
<0.96
NR
1.04
NR
<0.07
Rh.
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.05
<0.01
0,46
0.10
2.38
0.46
20.36
0.58
<0.96
<0.77
2.50
<0.25
3.84
<25.36
<9.60
<4.99
0.46
207.45
9. 60
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
5.76
3.19
69.15
NR
1,690.36
169. 04
NR
653.09
13.06
<192.09
537.84
338.07
MC
NR
<23.05
0.04
NR
MC = Major component of the sample.
NR = Not reported.
2-11
-------
TABLE 2-6. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
RUN II, XAD-2 RESIN
wg/m8
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
TM
Er
Ho
<0.69
<1.00
<0.31
<10.76
<0.38
NR
<0.54
NR
<0.81
<0.88
<0.54
<0.73
NR
<0.92
<0.22
<0.32
<0.19
<0.58
<0.18
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.32
<0.09
<0.32
<0.15
<0.58
<0.69
<0.12
<0.17
<0.18
<2.92
<0.03
<0.50
<0.42
<0.28
1.50
NR
<0.50
NR
<0.38
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge.
Ga
Zn
Cu
N1
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.14
<0.50
<0.46
<0.06
<0.23
<0.09
<8.07
<0.23
<33.42
<2.31
0.22
<0.19
<0.08
<61.47
<96.04
<57.63
<1.81
65.31
<5.76
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
<3.46
<0.77
<2.57
NR
<353.44
< 184. 40
NR
S <4,610.07
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
<61.47
<537.84
<76.83
< 238. 19
<960.43
NR
4.23
<0.05
NR
NR = Not reported.
2-12
-------
TABLE 2-7. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
RUN II, COMPOSITE SAMPLE
u
Th
B1
Pb
TV
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tn
Er
Ho
<0.50
<0.77
<0.23
<2.69
<0.29
NR
<0.38
NR
<0.61
<0.65
<0.42
<0,54
NR
<0.69
<0.16
<0.23
<0.14
<0.42
<0.14
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.24
<0.07
<0.24
<0.11
<0.42
<0.54
<0.09
<0.12
<0.13
0.50
<0.02
<0.36
<0.30
<0.21
49.94
NR
1.11
NR
<0.30
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.10
<0.38
<0.36
<0.05
<0.17
<0.07
0.30
<0.12
<2.88
0.50
<0.46
<0.14
<0.06
17.29
23.05
13.45
<0.96
145.99
5.76
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
AT
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
12.29
0.30
<1.34
NR
6,530.93
<26.12
NR
4,610.07
<153.67
14.60
8.84
9.99
<130.62
NR
4.32
3.84 (-03)
NR
NR = Not reported.
2-13
-------
TABLE 2-8. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
RUN fl, TOTAL SASS CATCH
ug/m3
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tn
Er
Ho
16.90
42.26
0.54 to 32.65
184.40
<1.96
NR
<1.92
NR
<2.96
<3.23
<2.04
<5.76
NR
<21.90
<5.76
<5.38
<1.00
<6.53
0.02 to 2.11
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.16 to
<0.28
<4.23
0.54 to
3.07 to
29.20
9.60
92.20
184.40
2,650.79
3.46
1.23
<8.07
6.53
65.31
NR
4.99
NR
<7.30
8.84 Rh
Ru
Mo
3.15 Nb
14.98 Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
In
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.85
<1.77
7.68
72.99
461.01
115.25
2.381.87
46.10
153.67
0.50 to 69.15
614.68
5.76 to 30.35
157. 51
806. 76
165. 19
211.29
46.10
t
1,575.11
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
LI
103.73
2,842.87
11,909.34
NR
*
9,988.47
NR
t
1,459.85
*
-
14,598.54
t
NR
3,841.72
13.45
NR
NR = Not reported.
*Total and emission values were not calculated owing to the presence of
an MC concentration.
JValue exceeds 1 g.
2-14
-------
TABLf 2-9. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
RUN #1, EMISSION FOUND
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tn
Er
Ho
0.017
0.043
0.0005
0.18
<0.0020
NR
<0.0019
NR
<0.0030
< 0.0032
<0.0020
<0.0056
NR
<0.022
<0.0058
<0.0055
<0.0010
< 0.0064
<0.0001
Dy
Tb
to 0.033 Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
to 0.0021 Pd
0.
<0.
<0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
<0.
0.
0.
NR
0.
NR
<0.
0002
0003
0042
0005
0031
029
0095
091
18
6
0034
0012
0081
0067
066
0050
0074
to 0.0087 Rh
Ru
Mo
to 0.0031 Nb
to 0.015 Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.
<0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
He
1.
0008
0018
0077
075
47
12
4
046
15
0005
60
0058
16
80
17
21
045
6
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
to 0.070 Si
Al
to 0.030 Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0
0
12
NR
190
10
NR
*
1
210
*
14
*
NR
4
0
NR
.100
.28
.5
.0
.013
NR * Not reported.
Total and emission values were not calculated owing to the presence of
an HC concentration.
2-15
-------
TABLE 2-10. SRARK SOURCE MASS SPECtROSCOPY
RUN #2, 10-ym CYCLONE
u
Th
Bi
Pb
T1
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
#b
Tffl
&r
Ho
3.85
10.74
<4.64
27.85
<0.24
NR
<0.29
NR
<0.46
<0.49
<0.30
<1.15
NR
<14.59
<4.11
<1.46
<0.60
<2.12
<0.42
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<2.92
<0.04
<2.12
<1.46
<7.29
<26.52
3.18
46.41
46.41
861.95
1.03
2.78
<2.25
4.91
4.64
NR
0.50
NR
<2.52
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
2r
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.44
<0.24
2.52
19.89
132.61
27.85
2,652.17
27.85
86.20
<55.70
477.39
<17.24
45.09
1,458.69
70.28
33.15
10.87
MC
1,591.30
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
31.83
132.61
5,039.12
NR
31,826.02
2,917.38
NR
91,499.80
570.22
MC
MC
6,099.99
1,856.52
NR
1,458.69
0.93
33.15
HR =^ot reported.
MC = Major component of the sample.
2-16
-------
TABU 2-11. SPARK SOURCE MASS
RUN 12, 3^mn CYCLONE
u
Th
Bi
Pb
ff
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
V
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Ta
Er
Ho
6.63
18.57
<15. 91
132.61
<0.21
NR
<0.25
NR
<0.38
<0.42
<0.27
<2.92
NR
<9.42
<3.58
<2.56
<0.09
<1.86
<1.05
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<5.17
<0.03
<3.05
<2.78
<10.87
11.80
3.85
19.89
114.04
2,784.78
1.23
<0.42
<2.39
4.24
5.70
NR
0.93
NR
<2.12
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.07
<0.21
3.05
23.87
238.70
25.20
1,312.82
23.87
75.59
<68.96
145.87
10. 74
79.57
225.43
87.52
58.35
18.57
21,217.35
238.70
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
17.24
115.37
4,376.08
NR
108,738.89
3,315.21
NR
26,521.68
278.48
53,043.36
15,913.01
2,784.78
1,312.82
NR
729.35
1.13
15.91
NR - Not reported.
2-17
-------
TABU 2-12. SffflK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
RUN #2, l*vm CYCLONE
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
2.39
4.64
<0.34
132.61
<2.92
NR
<0. 12
<0.20
<0.21
<0.13
<1.05
NR
<3.18
<0.61
<0.70
<0.54
<0.95
<0.27
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<2.65
<0.01
<0.90
<0.49
0.96
4.24
3.71
27.85
41.11
1,458.69
1.23
<0.30
<1.19
8.09
7.96
NR
0.58
NR
<1.59
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.04
<0.11
2.12
34.48
172.39
34.48
954.78
11.93
25.20
<34.48
384.56
30.50
128.63
159.13
61.00
42.43
13.26
18,565.18
225.43
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
SI
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
251.96
. 172.39
4,110.86
NR
MC
1,591.30
NR
7,293.46
742.61
42,434.69
MC
6,099.99
1,856.52
NR
663.04
1.59
8.22
NR = Not reported.
MC = Major component of the sample.
2-18
-------
TABLE 2-13. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
RUN 12, SASS FILTER CATCH
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Til
Er
Ho
0.30
0.44
0.52
6.10
<0.20
NR
<0.01
NR
<0.03
<0.03
<0.13
<0.16
NR
<0.17
<0.01
<0.09
<0.03
<0.12
<0.08
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.89
<0.04
<0.16
0.03
0.17
0.98
0.15
2.12
1.18
<91.50
<0.27
<0.03
0.13
0.69
<4.91
NR
<2.25
<2.25
<0.09
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
N1
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.03
<0.20
0.84
0.19
1.46
0.60
57.02
<1.46
<1.21
3.85
3.18
0.12
8.49
<35.80
<23.87
<4.38
<0.50
145.87
7.29
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
6.90
1.86
70.28
NR
'3,182.60
<122.00
NR
1,127.17
9.81
<225.43
1,458.69
185.65
<3,447.82
NR
<23.87
<0.05
<0.49
NR = Not reported.
2-19
-------
T«U t-H. &MK SOWKE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
f2, XWH2 RESIN
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
T«
Er
Ho
<13.26
<19.89
<6.10
<35.80
<7.56'
NR
<10.08
NR
<15.91
<17.24
<10.74
<14.59
NR
<18.57
<4.24
<6.10
<3.71
<11.01
<3.58
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<6.23
<1.72
<6.23
<2.78
<10.87
<13.26
<2.39
<3.32
<3.58
6.76
<0.57
<9.42
<7.82
<5.44
<7.69
NR
<9.68
NR
<7.82
Rh
Ru
Ho
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Hn
<2.78
<10.08
<9.28
-------
SPHTNWSCBFY
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
. Hf
Lu
Yb
TB
Er
Ho
<2.92
<4.11
<1.29
<2.65
<1.59
NR
<2.12
NR
<3 39
^W « Ob.
<3.58
<2.25
<3.05
NR
<3.85
<0.89
<1.29
<0.80
<2.39
<0.76
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<1.33
<0.36
<1.31
<0.60
<2.25
<2.92
<0.50
<0.69
<0.74
1.46
<0.12
<1.99
<1.72
<1.15
< 384. 56
NR
<15.91
NR
<1.59
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.
<2.
3,
0.
<0.
<0.
0.
0.
<8.
10.
0.
<0.
<0.
<62.
37.
<63.
0.
<251.
<12.
58
12
98
34
93
38
66
12
22
21
44
80
32
33
13
65
93
96
60
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
18.
<0.
<13.
NR
<291.
<100.
NR
21,217.
<848.
<198.
<76.
<92.
<716.
NR
128.
<0.
<1.
57
76
00
74
78
35
69
91
91
83
09
63
01
86
NR = Not reported.
2-21
-------
TACtl 2-lf. SMRK SOWCE MASS SPECTR9SCOPY
RUM 12, TOTAL SASS CATCH
U 13.26 Dy <19.89 Rh <3.85 Cr 331.52
Th 34.48 Tb <2.12 Ru <13.00 V 424.35
Bi 0.52 to 27.85 Gd <13.26 Mo 12.47 Ti 13,260.84
Pb 305.00 Eu 0.03 to 8.09 Nb 78.24 Sc NR
Tl <12.73 Sm 1.13 to 31.83 Zr 543.69 Ca *
Hg NR Nd 17.24 to 43.76 Y 87.52 K 7,691.29
Au <13.00 Pr 10.87 Sr 5,039.12 Cl NR
Pt NR Ce 96.80 Rb 63.65 S t
Ir <19.89. La 198.91 Br 185.65 P 1,591.30
Os <21.22 Ba 5,039.12 Se 14.59 to 159.13 Si *
Re <13.26 Cs 3.45 As 1,007.82 Al *
W <22.54 I 2.78 to 12.07 Ge 41.11 Mg 14,586.92
Ta NR Te 0.13 to 15.91 Ga 265.22 Na 5,039.12 to 14,5«
Hf <49.07 Sb 18.57 Zn 1,856.52 F NR
Lu <13.26 Sn 18.57 to 397.83 Cu 251.96 B 3,049.99
Yb <12.47 In NR Ni 132.61 to 636.52 Be 3.86
T» <5.83 Cd 1.99 to 27.85 Co 43.76 Li 61.00
Er <18.57 Ag NR Fe '*
Ho <6.23 Pd <15.91 Mn 1,989.13
NR = Not reported.
*Tota1 and emission values were not calculated owing to the presence of an
MC concentration.
tValue exceeds 1 g.
2-22
-------
TMU 1-17, 8MK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
AMU «, EWSSIOK FOUND
Th
Bi
W>
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
To
Er
Ho
0.013
0.035
0.0005 to 0
0.31
<0.013
NR
<0.013
NR
<0. 020
<0.022
<0.014
<0.023
NR
<0.049
<0.013
<0.012
<0.0058
<0.018
<0.0062
Dy
Tb
.028 Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
NR
0.
NR
<0.
019
0022
014
0001 to 0.008
0011 to 0.031
017 to 0.044
Oil
097
20
1
0035
0027 to 0.012
0001 to 0.015
018
018 to 0.40
0020 to 0.028
016
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.
<0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
5.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
*
2.
0039
013
012
079
54
088
0
063
19
014 to 0.16
0
041
26
9
26
13 to 0.64
044
0
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.33
0.43
14
NR
*
7.7
NR
220
1.6
*
*
15
5.0 to 14
NR
3.1
0.0038
0.060
NR - Not reported.
"Total and emission values were not calculated owing to the presence of an
NC concentration.
2-23
-------
TABLE 2-18. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
ESSO, ENGLAND, CAF8 PILOT PLANT SASS-1
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tro
Er
18
46
0.6 - 35
200
<2.1
<2.1
<3.2
<3.5
<2.2
<6.1
<24
<6.2
<5.9
<1.1
<6.9
Oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
0.
<0.
<4.
0.
3.
31
10
98
200
2,800
3.
1.
8.
7.
71
5.
2 - 9.4
3
6
6 - 3.4
3 - 16.0
7
3
8
2
4
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
0.9
<1.9
8.4
81
510
120
2,600
50
160
0.6 - 75
650
6.2 - 33
170
860
180
230
48
-
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
110
310
13,000
210,000
11,000
-
1,600
230,000
-
16,000
-
4,300
14
Ho <0.1 - 2.3 Pd 7.9 Mn 1,700
2-24
-------
TABLE 2-19. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
ESSO, ENGLAND, CAFB PILOT PLANT SASS-2
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
13
35
0.5 to 28
310
<13
<13
<20
<22
<14
<23
<49
<13
<12
<5.8
<18
<6.2
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<19
<2.2
<14
<0. 1-8.1
1.1-31
17-44
11
97
200
5,100
3.5
2.7-12
0.1-15
18
18-400
2.0-27
<16
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<3.9
<13
12
78
540
87
5,000
63
190
14-160
1,000
41
260
1,900
260
130-630
44
-
2,000
Cr
V
Ti 14
Sc
Ca
K 7
Cl
S 220
P 1
Si
Al
Mg 15
Na 5
F
B 3
Be
Li
330
430
,000
-
,700
,000
,600
-
-
,000
,000-14,000
,100
3.8
2-25
-------
TABLE 2-20. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CONVENTIONAL LIGNITE BOILER WITH
MULTICLONE - SITE A
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tra
Er
Ho
56
74
2.6
320
<8.3
<4.1
<6.3
<7,0
<4.5
6.2 - 33
<13
<3
<3.2
<2.5
<4.8
• <1.1 •'• '
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sro
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<3.2
<0.7
<3.2
<1.8
<5.4
13
29
240
320
200,000
18
3.3
<3.3
40
23
33
<6.7
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
6.6
<3.6
38
67
1,300
190
41,000
290
210
83
1,600
7.2
240
880
470
1,400
100
-
27,000
Cr
V
Tl 28
Sc
Ca
K 39
Cl
S 160
P 16
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B 140
Be
Li
470
470
,000
-
,000
,000
,000
-
-
-
-
,000
10
570
2-26
-------
TABLE 2-21. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CONVENTIONAL LIGNITE BOILER WITH ESP
SITE B
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
ft
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tin
Er
Ho
<1.2
<1. 7
<0.5
1.1-8.5
<0.7
<0.9
<1.4
<1.5
<0.9
<1.3
<1.6
<0.4
<0.5
<0.3
<1
<0.3
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.5
<0.1
<0.5
<0.2
<0.9
<1.2
<0.2
<0.3
<0.3
<28
<0.1
<0.8
<0.7
<0.5
1.3-16
0.9-2.1
<0.7
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.
<0.
o.
<0.
0.
<0.
<10
<0.
<43
9.
<4.
<0.
<0.
2
9
8
1
3
1-0.1
1-0.4
7
2
1-0.3
1-0.1
13-31
<36
<69
<0.
<170
<7.
8
8
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
<4.2
<1.1
<3.5
40-390
560
1,400-7,
<46
180
700
36-88
160
680
64
0.2
<0.3
2-27
-------
TABLE 2-22. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
PARTICULATE FILTER FROM SASS-1
(MS)
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
0.93
1.4
1.5
15
<0.22
<0. 010
<0.016
<0.018
<0.17
<0.19
<0.017
<0.11
<0.032
<0.12
0.061
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.45
<0.002
<0.15
0.11
0.53
1.5
0.44
6.6
3.6
70
0.41
<0.010
<0.29
0.71
1.4
14*
3.5
<0. 098
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.066
<0.010
1.6
0.30
7.4
1.3
59
2.0
1.3
<1.1
7.8
<0.36
11
36
14
7.0
1.5
680
31
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
17.
9.3
200
4,900
510
2,100
41
270
1,600
1000
MC
33
0.16
0.68
Maternal
MOTE: 0.0739 9 (10,96 ptmnt).
2-28
-------
TABLE 2-23. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
PARTICIPATE FILTER BLANK FROM SASS-1 AND SASS-2
(U9)
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Ti
Er
Ho
<0.025
<0.036
<0.011
2.1
<0.014
<0.018
<0.028
<0.031
<0.020
<0.026
<0.033
<0.008
<0.011
<0.007
<0.020
<0.007
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.011
<0.003
<0.011
<0.005
<0.020
<0.025
<0.004
0.049
<0.006
32
0.069
0.096
<0.014
0.16
2.4
14*
0.54
<0.014
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.005
<0.018
0.24
0.012
0.54
0.009
1.4
0.35
1.2
0.25
0.67
<0.056
<0.100
37.
19
11
0.24
92
3.3
• Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
C1
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.70
0.21
0.68
73
36
230
4.4
170
16
35
1,700
32
0.050
0.13
NOTE: 11.56 ptrctnt.
2-29
-------
TABLE 2-24. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
PARTICULATE FILTER- FROM SASS-2
(M9)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
*f«fe*MI
wW^^W^v iW
NOTE:
0.27
0.40
0.47
7.7
<0.091
<0.006
<0.009
<0. 010
<0.061
<0.072
<0.079
<0.007
<0.041
<0.013
<0.055
<0.036
•1 Haarttrl
0.0438g.
Oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sin
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.40
<0. 017
<0.074
0.022
0.15
0.89
0.14
2.0
1.1
41
0.12
0.011
0.12
0.79
2.2
14*
1.0
<0.039
•
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
In
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.009
<0.093
0.99
0.18
1.9
0.55
53
0.66
0.54
3.7
3.6
0.11
7.7
16
11
2.0
0.23
220
9.9
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
6.9
1.8
64
2,900
55
1,300
13
100
1,300
200
1,500
11
0.024
0.22
2-30
-------
TABLE 2-25. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFB LIGNITE
(ppm)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Ft
If
Os
m
w
ft
«f
tu
Yb
Ta
Er
Ho
0.23
0.32
0.20
9.6
<0.029
<0.036
<0.055
<0.060
<0.038
0.100
<0.12
<0.031
<0.090
<0. 013
<0.039
<0.006
Oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.20
0.024
0.061
<0.015
0.18
0.60
0.14
1.1
1.5
38
0.046
0.040
0.075
0.30
2.1
21*
0.17
<0.037
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.010
<0.030
0.43
0.64
5.9
0.65
37
0.59
0.23
2.8
1.5
0.20
2.6
13
15
23
0.50
0.19 (%)
22
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
2.
14
230
0.
92
0.
42
1.
0.
130
180
21
0.
0.
7
17 (%)
23 (%)
3 (%)
23 (%)
030
82
0,6757 g.
2-31
-------
TABLE 2-26. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFB STACK KNOCKOUT
(PP«)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
"9
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tt
Er
Hp
9.3
37
<0.67
120
<1.9
<0. 35
<0. 54
<0.59
<0.37
<1.4
<13
<1.7
<2.7
<1.1
<3.1
<1.0
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<7.5
<0.042
<1.8
<1.8
<7.5
34
11
160
110
6.8
<1.2
<2.7
4.4
14
160*
2.6
<2.0
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.095
<0.29
4.2
47
330
48
66
100
<36
120
<7.4
79
140
120
220
18
370
Cr 62
V 320.
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P 760
Si MC
Al MC
Mg
Na
F
B
Be 1.6
Li 81
2-32
-------
TABLE 2-27. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFB STACK CYCLONE
(ppm)
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
V
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
6.6
19
<2.0
34
<0.14
<0.17
<0.27
<0.29
<0.18
<1.0
<9.4
<1.8
<1.4
<0.75
<2.7
0.51
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
5.3
<0.021
<2.5
0.95
<8.9
17
7.2
56
110
680
1.2
0.83
<0.95
3.1
3.5
130*
1.0
<1.0
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.19
<0.15
2.6
47
230
68
0.12 (%)
42
73
<18
190
<5.6
39
<59
61
56
13
2.8 (%)
620
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
C1
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
i ., ••77— 'j; -*•„ — ;
31
160
1.
6.
0.
0.
690
MC
MC
0.
0.
590
1.
68
1 (%)
7 (%)
82 (%)
43 (%)
64 (%)
27 (%)
1
1 -f-TTT
•Intern*!
NOTE: 0.1064 g.
2-33
-------
TABLE 2-28. SPARK-.SOURCE MASS SPEGTROSCOPY
CAFB REGENERATOR CYCLONE
CPP*)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tin
Er
Ho
8.9
24
<0.45
53
<1.3
<0.12
<0.18
<0.20
<0.12
<0.47
<8.7
<1.7
<0.92
<0.36
<1.8
0.98
oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<3.8
<0.014
<1.7
1.2
<6.0
16
6.9
53
38
0.14 (%)
2.3
2.2
<0.90
3.0
3.7
160*
1.3
<1.5
Rh
Ru
Ho
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Nn
-------
TABLE 2-29. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFB GASIFIER BED
(ppm)
u
Th
Bi
Pb,
•'T1
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
<0.74
<1.0
<0.44
<2.8
<0.54
<0.65
<1.0
<1.1
<0.69
<0.46
<2.3
<0.56
<0.41
<0.24
<0.70
<0.12
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.40
<0.078
<0.40
<0.28
<0.84
<0.58
<0.86
9.7
14
150
0.60
<0.13
<0.49
23
19
150*
<0.12
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
N1
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.18
<0.54
<0.33
12
110
17
290
15
72
<48
720
<15
47
67
40
36
9.1
2.5 (%)
180
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
11
100
0.
MC
0.
3.
260
MC
0.
1.
390
960
0.
25
18 (%)
56 (%)
2 (%)
41 (%)
4 (%)
.77
^Internal standard.
NOTE: 0.0949 g.
2-35
-------
TABLE 2-30. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFB REGENERATOR BED
(PP»>
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
1.1
2.3
<0.083
2.4
<0.100
<0.12
<0.19
<0.20
<0.13
<0.24
<1.5
<0.100
<0.077
<0.25
<0.13
<0.12
Oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
SHI
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.44
<0.015
<0.42
<0.052
<0.16
2.0
0.47
6.8
7.3
130.
0.45
0.20
<0.091
6.1
9.8
t
170*
0.041
<1.0
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cd
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.18
<0.100
1.3
8.2
35
4.4
220
29
36
<6.2
240
5.3
14
24
21
14
3.2
0.36 (%)
76
Cr
V
Tl
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
4.2
38
0.23 (%)
MC
0.31 (%)
0.30 (%)
85
3.2 (%)
3.0 (%)
0.48 (%)
0.11 (%)
140
0.20
16
*Int«rn«l standard.
NOTE: 0.0865 g.
2-36
-------
TABLE 2-31. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFB OIL FEED
(ppm)
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
<0.049
<0.071
0.12
11
<0.028
<0.037
<0.057
<0.062
<0.039
<0.052
<0.065
<0.015
<0.022
<0.014
<0.040
<0.013
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.023
<0.006
<0.023
<0.010
<0.040
<0.050
<0.009
<0.012
<0.013
0.41
0.006
0.067
<0.029
0.15
0.45
17*
0.82
<0.029
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.23
<0.037
0.79
0. 024
0.045
<0.007
0.38
0.093
0.28
<0.019
1.3
<0.014
<0.006
48
28
97
0.67
33
2.3
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.98
49
0.32
83
99
0.42 (%)
15
110
31
31
150
0.11
0.001
0.34
internal standard.
NOTE: 0.8356 g.
2-37
-------
TABLE 2-321 SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFff BITUMEN
(PP»)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tin
Er
Ho
<0.060
<0. 087
<0.027
3.7
<0. 034
<0.045
<0. 069
<0.075
<0.047
<0.064
<0.079
<0.019
<0.027
<0.016
<0.048
<0.016
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sin
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.028
<0.007
<0.028
<0.012
<0.048
<0.060
<0.011
0.040
<0.016
1.4
0.007
<0.041
<0. 035
0.091
0.76
15*
0.24
<0.035
Rh
Ru
No
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.012
<0.044
0.23
0.014
<0.019
<0.008
0.33
0.056
<0.059
1.3
4.6
<0.017
0.056
110
20
110
0.58
40
2.0
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
1.2
130
0.39
59
24
0.28 (%)
18
140
11
29
19
1.9
0.016
0.53
^Internal standard.
NOTE: 0.9791 g.
2-38
-------
TABLE 2-33. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
BIOLOGICAL PLANT SLUDGE SAMPLE
(ppra)
u
Th
Bi
Pb—
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
In
Er
Ho
<0.025
<0.023
<0.021
0.18
<0.020
<0.020
<0.019
<0.019
<0.019
<0.018
<0.018
<0.017
<0.017
<0.017
<0.017
<0.016
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.016
<0.016
<0.016
<0. 015
<0.015
<0.014
<0.014
0.011
<0.014
0.27
0.004
<0.03
<0.013
0,014
0.10
A
0.19
<0.011
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
G
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.010
<0.010
0.065
0.003
0.030
0.006
0.95
0.090
3.0
6.4
2.5
0.81
<0.021
2.0
1.3
14
0.16
210
5.2
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.071
0.025
0.30
2,100
12
270
1,300
27
32
24
96
1,000
26
0.69
0.006
0.23
*Interna1 standard.
2-39
-------
TABLE 2-34. SPARK SOURCE MASS.SPECTROSCOPY
10-Mm CYCLONE CATCH FROM SASS-1
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
5.3
15
<2. 3
62
<0.38
<0.099
<0.15
<0.17
<0.11
<0.58
<2.5
<1.0
<0.78
<0.30
<1. 1
<0.21
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<2.9
<0.012
<1.4
1.1
6.0
13
4.1
32
45
660 '
1.9
2.6
<1.6
1.8
5.7
140*
1.5
<1.7
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Hi
Co
Fe
Mn
<0. 31
<0.083
2.4
27
150
54
850
19
83
<27
200
12
31
660
97
46
21
MC
0.19(X)
Cr 40
V 91
Ti 0.64(%)
Sc
Ca 6.5(%)
K 0.17(%)
Cl
S MC
P 210
Si 6.7(%)
Al MC
Mg 0.48(%)
Na 850
F
B 340
Be 3.6
Li
MC • Major component.
*lntemal standard.
NOTE: 0.1058 g.
2-40
-------
TABLE 2-35. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
3-Mm CYCLONE CATCH FROM SASS-1
(ppro)
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
9.8
20
<8.4
50
<0.15
<0.18
<0.28
<0.31
<0.20
<0.73
<2.3
<0.89
<0.95
<0.068
<0.20
<0.38
oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.
<0.
<0.
<0.
<2.
12
4.
30
42
720
1.
<0.
<0.
2.
5.
11
022
11
71
8
1
3
44
83
3
3
140*
0.
<1.
98
6
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.050
<0.15
2.8
25
190
36
0.100(%)
17
54
<6.8
210
<8.1
58
230
32
85
14
1.7(%)
360
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
25
96
0.
9.
0.
0.
730
13(
1.
0.
0.
0.
2.
24
36(%)
0(%)
47(%)
90(%)
%)
9(%)
74(%)
31(%)
11(%)
4
"Internal standard.
NOTE: 0.1003 g.
2-41
-------
TABLE 2-36. SPARK SOURCE^MASS 5PECTROSCOPY
1-M»;CYCLONE CATCH*FROM
(ppn)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
5.6
23
<9.7
160
<0. 35
<0.42
<0.65
<0.71
<0.45
<1.7
<11.
<2.1
<1.7
<0.16
<3.2
<0.62
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<4;
<0.
<1.
-------
TABLE 2-37. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
XAD-2 RESIN FROM SASS-1
(ppm)
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tra
Er
Ho
<0.084
<0.12
<0.038
1.3
<0.047
<0.063
<0.097
<0.11
<0.067
<0.090
<0.11
<0.026
<0.038
<0.023
<0.068
<0.022
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
SRI
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.039
<0.011
<0.039
<0.018
<0.068
<0.085
<0.015
<0.020
<0.022
<0.35
<0.003
<0.058
<0.049
<0.034
0.37
21*
<0.061
<0.049
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
< 0.017
<0.063
<0.058
<0.007
<0.027
<0.011
0.96
0.028
4.1
<0.28
0.052
<0.023
<0.009
7.3
12
7.1
<0.22
31
0.70
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.42
0.094
<0.31
43
22
570
7.5
65
9.4
29
110
1.4
<0.006
0.040
•Internal standard.
NOTE: 0.6928 g.
2-43
-------
TABLE 2-38. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
XAD-2 RESIN BLANK FOR SASS-1 AND SASS-2
(PP»)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
<0.25
<0.36
<0.11
1.3
<0.14
<0.18
<0.28
<0.31
<0.20
<0.26
<0.33
<0.077
<0.11
< 0.068
<0.20
<0.066
Oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sn
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.11
<0.031
<0.11
<0.052
<0.20
<0.25
< 0.044
< 0.059
< 0.064
<2.1
<0.010
<0.17
<0.14
<0.100
<0.14
21*
<0.18
<0.14
Rh
Ru
Ho
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.050
<0.18
<0.17
<0.021
<0.080
<0.033
1.4
0.12
12
0.82
<0.038
<0.069
< 0.028
6.8
8.7
11
0.16
16
2.0
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.29
0.097
0.91
120
120
500
22
46
16
15
180
0.38
<0.001
0.060
^Internal standard.
NOTE: 0.6674 g from 4.1 g.
2-44
-------
TABLE 2-39. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
COMPOSITE SAMPLE* FROM SASS-1
(ppm)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
TV
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
<0.003
<0.004
<0.001
0.016
<0.002
<0.002
<0. 004
<0. 004
<0.002
<0.003
<0.004
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.002
<0.001
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0. 001
<0.002
<0.003
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.006
<0.001
<0.002
<0.002
<0.001
0.84
1.8t
0.018
<0.002
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.001
<0. 002
<0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
0.006
0.001
0.017
0.010
0.003
<0.001
<0.001
0.32
0.30
0. 18
0.006
2.0
0.073
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
• K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.15
0.005
0.008
81
0.16
57
0.92
0.30
0.15
0.14
0.77
0.050
0.000
0.001
*Compos1te of add module Hnse, condensate, and first impinger.
tlnternal standard.
NOTE: 20 mL.
2-45
-------
TABLE 2-40. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
COMPOSITE SAMPLE BLANK* FROMfSASS-1
u
Th
B1
Pb
T1
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
<0.002
<0.002
<0.001
0.009
<0.001
<0.001
<0.002
<0. 002
<0.001
<0. 002
<0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.002
<0.001
<0.001
<0.001
<0.007
<0.001
<0.001
< 0.001
<0.001
0.24
1.8t
0.005
<0.001
RH
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
N1
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.002
*•
xp.OOl "
-------
TABLE 2-41. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
10-pm CYCLONE CATCH FROM SASS-2
(ppm)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt '
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
6.2
17
<3.7
46
<0.19
<0.23
<0.36
<0.39
<0.25
<0.93
<12
<3.3
<1.2
<0.48
<1.8
<0.34
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<2.4
<0.028
<1.7
<1.2
<5.9
<22
5.2
75
76
1,400
1.7
4.5
, <1.8
8.0
7.5
140*
0.82
<2.0
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.35
<0.20
4.0
32
220
46
4,300
44
140
<45
780
<14
74
2,400
110
53
18
MC
2,500
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
51
210
8,200
51,000
4,600
150,000
930
MC
MC
9,800
3,000
2,500
1.5
54
MC = Major component.
*Interna1 standard.
NOTE: 0.1024 g.
2-47
-------
TABLE 2-42. §PA«R SOURCE HA|$ SPECTROSCOPY
3-pm CYCLONE CifCtf FrtOl &&S-2
U
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
5.5
16
<6.7
110
<0.086
<0.100
<0.16
<0.17
<0.11
<1.2
<3.9
<1.5
<1.1
<0.039
<0.79
<0.43
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<2.2
<0.013
<1.3
-------
TABLE 2-43. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
1-pm CYCLONE CATCH FROM SASS-2
(ppm)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
3.9
7.7
<0.28
220
<2.4
<0.100
<0.16
<0.17
<0.11
<0.86
<2.6
<0.50
<0.58
<0.45
<0.78
<0.22
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<2.2
<0.012
<0.75
<0.40
1.6
7.0
6.1
47
67
2,300
2.0
<0.25
<0.98
13
13
140*
0.95
<1.3
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
N1
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.028
<0.087
3.6
56
270
57
1,600
20
42
<28
630
50
210
260
100
70
22
31,000
370
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
420
290
6,700
MC
2,700
12,000
1,200
70,000
MC
9,900
3,000
1,100
2.6
14
MC = Major component.
^Internal standard.
NOTE: 0.1007 g.
2-49
-------
TABLE 2-44. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
XAO-2 RESIN FROM SASS-2
(PP»)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
<0.49
<0.70
<0.22
1.3
<0.27
<0.36
<0.56
<0.61
<0.38
<0.52
<0.64
<0.15
<0.22
<0.13
<0.39
<0.13
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
SHI
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.22
<0.061
<0.22
<0.100
<0.39
<0.49
<0.086
<0.12
<0.13
0.48
<0.020
<0.34
<0.28
<0.20
<0.28
21*
<0.35
<0.28
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.098
<0.36
<0.33
<0.042
<0.16
<0.065
1.3
0.23
8.2
<0. 19
<0.075
<0.13
<0.055
9.4
12
20
0.15
31
1.1
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.54
0.064
0.89
82
49
5,800
22
47
18
29
360
4.2
0.011
0.23
^Internal standard.
NOTE: 0,6787 g;from 6.5 g.
2-50
-------
TABLE 2-45. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
COMPOSITE SAMPLE* FROM SASS-2
(ppro)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tin
Er
Ho
<0.008
<0.012
<0.004
<0.008
<0.005
<0.006
<0.009
<0.010
<0.007
<0.009
<0.011
<0.003
<0.004
<0.002
<0.007
<0.002
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.004
<0.001
<0.004
<0.002
<0.007
<0. 008
<0.001
<0.002
<0.002
0.008
<0.001
<0.006
<0.005
<0.003
1.1
0.72t
0.045
<0.005
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.002
<0.006
0.023
0.002
<0.003
<0.001
0.004
0.001
0.024
0.059
0.002
<0.002
<0.001
0.18
0.29
0.19
0.005
0.74
0.036
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.12
0.002
0.038
0.84
0.29
130
2.4
0.59
0.22
0.27
2.1
0.77
<0.001
0.005
Composite of add module Hnse, condensate, and first implnger.
tlnternal standard.
NOTE: 20 nt.
2-51
-------
TABLE 2-46. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
COMPOSITE SAMPLE BLANK* FROM SASS-2
(PP«)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tra
Er
Ho
<0.024
<0.034
<0.011
<0.022
<0.013
<0.018
<0.027
<0.030
<0.019
<0.025
<0.031
<0.007
<0.011
<0.006
<0.019
<0.006
=^i .. ., ..
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.011
<0.003
<0.011
<0.005
<0.019
<0.024
<0.004
<0.006
<0.006
<0.008
<0.001
<0.016
<0.014
<0.009
1.3
0.72t
0.039
<0.014
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.005
< 0.018
<0.016
<0.002
< 0.008
<0.003
<0.004
<0.001
0.13
<0.009
<0.004
<0.006
< 0.003
1.0
0.076
0.38
<0.001
0.53
0.026
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
C1
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.009
0.002
0.021
0.85
0.16
9.6
2.1
2.3
0.22
0.21
5.9
0.025
0.000
0.003
Composite of add module rinst, condensate. and first 1rop1nger.
tlntemal standard.
NOTE: 20 mL.
2-52
-------
TABLE 2-47. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFB LIMESTONE
(ppm)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tin
Er
Ho
aaocc
<0.37
<0.53
<0.23
12
<0.27
<0.33
<0.51
<0.55
<0.35
<0.24
<1.2
<0.29
<0.21
<0.12
<0.36
<0.059
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.20
<0.40
<0.20
<0.14
<0.43
<0.30
0.22
0.42
1.8
160
0.052
4.5
<0.25
0.96
4.7
110*
<0.059
<0.34
Rti
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.089
<0.28
0.48
<0.13
1.2
0.52
210
2.1
<18
<4.3
<0.079
<0.11
<0.048
2.1
4.7
14
0.58
1,500
8.8
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.76
6.4
80
160,000
220
530
39
430
130
2,200
110
17
0.012
0.086
^Internal standard.
NOTE: 0.1324 g.
2-53
-------
TABLE 2-48. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFB FINES RETURN
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
5.1
10
<0.093
27
<0.11
<0.14
<0.21
<0.23
<0.14
<0.54
<2.5
<1.4
<0.70
<0.14
<1.0
0.20
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<2.8
<0.016
<0.98
0.52
<3.4
9.1
4.1
44
44
910
1.9
0.45
<0.74
3.3
5.5
190.0*
0.45
<0.79
Rh
Ru
No
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
2n
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.21
<0.11
2.9
<37
180
26
900
,26
110
<19
270
<2.9
21
<0.041
47
:21
10
41,000
260
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
LI
59
120
8,700
MC
3,500
9.400
540
MC
MC
5,000
640
160
0.30
3.1
MC = Major component.
"Internal standard.
NOTE: 0:076§ g.
2-54
-------
TABLE 2-49. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFB BOILER BACK
(ppm)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tin
Er
Ho
4.1
16
<0.074
29
<0.85
<0.11
<0.17
<0.18
<0.12
<0.90
<5.4
<0.77
<0.43
<0.33
<1.7
<0.45
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<2.2
<0.013
<0.67
<0.77
<4.7
15
4.5
35
49
430
3.0
<0.12
<0.83
1.8
6.3
150*
0.77
cl.3
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.029
<0.091
1.9
59
200
30
1,100
21
46
<15
120
<4.8
34
62
75
50
5.7
33,000
210
Cr
V
Tl
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
SI
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
25
100
3,800
71,000
5,100
7,500
230
MC
MC
3,500
960
210
0.49
14
MC = Major component.
Internal standard.
NOTE: 0.0961 g.'
2-55
-------
TABLE 2-50. SPARK SOURCE flASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFB BOILER SIDES
-------
TABLE 2-51. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFB LIMESTONE FEED
(ppm)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
T1
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tin
Er
Ho
<0.63
<0.63
<0.28
8.3
<0.33
<0.43
<1.2
<0.65
<0.74
<0.46
<0.61
<0.75
<0.17
<0.27
<0.16
<0.46
<0.15
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.26
<0.07
<0.28
<0.12
<0.48
<0.50
0.21
0.43
0.95
160
0.06
19
<0.35
0.95
5.5
15*
<0.34
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.12
<0.43
0.87
<0.05
0.55
0.24
210
1.7
<21
<4.4
<328
<0.17
<0.07
<1.4
3.8
4.4
0.23
590
7.5
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.63
3.6
40
MC
230
400
27
400
150
3,600
110
150
5.5
0.003
0.09
MC = Major component.
"Internal standard.
2-57
-------
TABLE 2-52. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
CAFB LIGNITE*
(PP»)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
1.2
3.8
<0.33
13
<0.47
<0.23
<0.64
<0.35
<0.40
<0.25
<0.60
<0.75
<0.17
<0.27
<0.16
<0.25
<0.15
Oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.26
<0.16
<0.43
<0.12
<0.73
1.1
1.4
3.4
10
320
0.86
0. 16
4.9
0.38
1.9
ist
0.69
<0.18
Rh,
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.064
<0.23
0.73
6.9
65
8.2
230
7.8
11
<9.3
<57
<3.0
14
11
19
10
2.2
5,700
100
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
13
28
1,400
MC
4,900
8,600
76
MC
MC
4,400
80
92
88
0.55
MC = Major component.
^Concentrations based on "as received" lignite weight.
tlnternal standard.
2-58
-------
TABLE 2-53. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
CAFB-LIGNITE STUDY
(pg/g)
Sample As Hg Sb
Gasifier bed 0.037
Main cyclone 0.029
Regenerator bed 0.029
Regenerator cyclone 0.054
Stack cyclone 0.129
Stack knockout baffle 0.833
Lignite 0.158
2-59
-------
TABLE 2-54. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
CAFB-LIGMITE PROCESS*
SASS RUN f1
(ppm)
Sample As Hg Sb
Filter 1.24
l-\im cyclone 0.80
3-nrn cyclone 0.70
ID-pro cyclone 1.12
XAO <0.072
CHt 0.014
ICf 0.003
NO = Not detected; sample is less than or equal to blank.
*A11 values blank-corrected.
tCombination of first impinger, condensate, and acid module rinse.
^Combination of second and third impingers.
TABLE 2-S5. ATONIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
CAFB- LIGNITE PROCESS*
SASS RUN #2
Sample As Hg Sb
Filter 12.67
1-pm cyclone 1.87
3-jjffl cyclone 1.19
10-MB) cyclone 0.79
XAD <0.081
CHt 0.034
ICt _ 0.003 _
NO = Not detected; sample is less than or equal to blank.
*A11 values blank-corrected.
•(•Combination of first impinger, condensate, and acid module rinse.
^Combination of second and third impingers.
2-60
-------
TABLE 2-56. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
VENTURI SCRUBBER
(M9/m3)
Sample As
Probe + cyclone rinse
10- + 3-um particulates
1-um + filter particulates
XAD-2
Condensate + 1st impinger
2nd + 3rd impinger <0.03
Hg Sb
<0.004
<0.02
<0.002
<0.3
<0.21
<0.04 <0.4
TABLE 2-57. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
TCA SCRUBBER
(pg/m3)
Sample As
Probe + cyclone rinse
10- + 3-um particulates
1-pm + filter particulates
XAD-2
Condensate + 1st impinger
2nd + 3rd impinger <0.03
Hg
<0.004
<0.004
<0.003
<0.3
<0.006
0.38
Sb
_
-
-
-
-
<0.4
TABLE 2-58. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
OXIDATION TANK VENT
Sample As
Probe + cyclone rinse
10- + 3-um particulates
1-um + filter particulates
XAD-2
Condensate + 1st impinger
2nd + 3rd impinger <0.03
Hg
*
A
<0.002
<0.03
<0.04
<0.04
Sb
-
-
-
-
-
<0.4
*0xidation tank vent stream did not contain a significant
particulate loading.
2-61
-------
TABLE 2-59. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
SCRUBBER SAMPLES
Sample
Venturi filter cake
Venturi spray tower
slurry (liquid)
Venturi spray tower
slurry (solids)
TCA centrifuge cake
As
NR
NR
NR
NR
Hg
0.09
0.9*
0.061" (5.0*)*
0.03
Sb
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR = None reported.
WL.
TBased on solid content of 78.8 g/L.
2-62
-------
TABLE 2-60. FIXED GASES
CAFB GAS ANALYSIS
(ppmv)
Sample test date 02 C02
1/24 9.1 10.1
1/25 9.0 6.1
1/27 5.3 6.4
TABLE 2-61. NITROGEN OXIDES
CAFB GAS ANALYSIS
(ppmv)
Sample test date NO
1/24 28
1/25 14.5
1/27 26
TABLE 2-62. SULFUR SPECIES
CAFB GAS ANALYSIS
(ppmv)
Sample test date COS H2S
1/24
1/26
1/27
CO
<0.05
<0.05
<0.05
N0x
33
15.7
42
S02
101.9
299.7
185.0
N2
S03
0.8
1.3
0.9
2-63
-------
TABLE 2-63. FIXED GASES
CAFB PILOT PLANT
02 C02 CO
Flue gas 140,000,000 <57,000
TABLE 2-64. SULFUR GASES
CAFB PILOT PLANT
(Mg/»a)
COS H2S S02 S03
Flue gas 510,000 3,200
TABLE 2-65. NITROGEN GASES
CAFB PILOT PLANT
(ug/«3)
Flue gas 37,000 28,000
2-64
-------
TABLE 2-66. ANION ANALYSIS
CAFB-LIGNITE STUDY
(ppm)
Sample F Cl" N
-------
TABLE 2-67. ANION ANALYSIS
CAFB-LIGNITE PROCESS*
SASS RUN #1
(ppn)
Sample F Cl N03
Filter
l-|jm cyclone
3-pm cyclone
10-pm cyclone
XAD
CHt
590
420
90
350
20
50
NO
5
100
-
NO
8
59,000
8,200
7,400
75,000
1,800
-
NO = Not detected; sample is less than or equal to blank.
*A11 values blank-corrected.
tConbination of first impinger, condensate, and acid module rinse.
^Combination of second and third impingers.
TABLE 2-68. ANION ANALYSIS
CAFB-LIGNITE PROCESS*
SASS RUN #2
(pp»n)
Sample F~ Cl" NOg S0<
Filter
l-|jm cyclone
3-pm cyclone
lO-pm cyclone
XAD
CHt
590
420
90
350
20
50
NO
5
100
-
NO
8
110,000
220,000
210,000
740,000
320
-
ND = Not detected; sample is less than or equal to blank.
*A11 values blank-corrected.
•{•Combination of first impinger, condensate, and acid nodule rinse.
fCombination of second and third Impingers.
2-66
-------
TABLE 2-69. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
CAFB GAS ANALYSIS
1/24
Volatile No. of
Gas Range weight, ppm peaks
GC1 21.4
GC2* 2.8
GC3
GC4
GC5
GC6
GC7 _==_==
*No hydrocarbons above C2 detected, MDL 0.5 ppmv.
TABLE 2-70. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
CAFB GAS ANALYSIS
1/25
Gas
GC1
GC2*
GC3
GC4
GC5
GC6
GC7
Volatile
.Range weight, ppm
6.5
<0.5
No. of
peaks
*No hydrocarbons above C2 detected, MDL 0.5 ppmv.
TABLE 2-71. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
CAFB GAS ANALYSIS
Gas
GC1
GC2*
GC3
GC4
GC5
GC6
GC7
Volatile
Range weight, ppm
<0.5
<0.5
No. of
peaks
*No hydrocarbons above C2 detected, MDL 0.5 ppmv.
2-67
-------
TABLE 2-72. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
TOTAL CAFB ORGANIC EMISSIONS
SASSfl
Gas
GC1
GC2
GC3
GC4
GC5
GC6
GC7
Volatile
Range weight, ppm
17,770 -
23,192
No. of
peaks
NR
NR = Not reported.
TABLE 2-73. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
TOTAL CAFB ORGANIC EMISSIONS
SASS #2
Volatile No. of
Gas Range weight, ppn peaks
GC1
GC2
GC3 No data NR
GC4
GC5
GC6
GC7
NR = Not reported.
2-68
-------
TABLE 2-74. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
TOTAL CAFB ORGANIC EMISSIONS
SASS #1
Gas
GC7
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
>GC16
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
Volatile No. of
weight, ppm peaks
NR
221
565
NR = Not reported.
TABLE 2-75. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
TOTAL CAFB ORGANIC EMISSIONS
SASS #2
Gas
GC7
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
>GC16
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
Volatile
weight, ppm
307
21,725
No. of
peaks
NR
NR = Not reported.
2-6S
-------
TABLE 2-76. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
Volatile No. of
Gas Range weight, ppn peaks
GC1 0.009
GC2 0.002
GC3
GC4
GC5
GC6
GC7
TABLE 2-77. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
CAFB SASS SAMPLES
10-ura CYCLONE
Volatile weight, ug/m3
Gas Range Run no. 1 Run no. 2
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
NR
NR
2.49
1.07
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
6.31
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR ~ Not reported.
*Not usually included in TCO range; i.e., C8-Ci6.
NOTE: No information was reported concerning the number of peaks.
2-70
-------
TABLE 2-78. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
CAFB SASS SAMPLES
3-pm CYCLONE
Gas
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
Volatile
Run no. 1
NR
NR
7.44
1.90
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
weight, jjg/m3
Run no. 2
NR
NR
31.1
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR = Not reported.
*Not usually included in TCO range; i.e., C8-C16.
NOTE: No information was reported concerning the number of peaks.
TABLE 2-79. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
CAFB SASS SAMPLES
l-joi CYCLONE
Gas
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
Volatile
Run no. 1
NR
NR
5.78
2.98
NR
NR
0.624
NR
NR
NR
weight, ug/m3
Run no. 2
NR
NR
6.24
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
14.6
NR
NR = Not reported.
*Not usually included in TCO range; i.e., C8-C16.
NOTE: No information was reported concerning the number of peaks.
2-71
-------
TABLE 2-80. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
CAFB SASS SAMPLES
PARTICULATE FILTER
Gas
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
Volatile
Run no. 1
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.599
2.66
NR
5.39
4.69
weight, ug/m3
Run no. 2
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR = Not reported.
*Not usually included in TCO range; i.e., C8-C16.
NOTE: No information was reported concerning the number of peaks.
TABLE 2-81. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
CAFB SASS SAMPLES
PROBE RINSE
Gas
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
Volatile
Run no. 1
NR
4.66
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.131
NR
weight, ug/m3
Run no. 2
NR
NR
NR
0.659
0.838
NR
NR
NR
2.86
NR
NR = Not reported.
*Not usually included in TCO range; i.e., C8-C16.
NOTE: No information was reported concerning the number of peaks.
2-72
-------
TABLE 2-82. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
CAFB SASS SAMPLES
XAD-2 RESIN
Volatile weight. ug/m3
Gas
Range
Run no. 1
Run no. 2
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
NR
11.2
2.00
22.5
BR
22.8
4.57
7.06
1.26
3.60
NR
NR
NR
BR
BR
BR
NR
NR
BR
NR = Not reported.
BR = Blank removes; sample less than or equal to blank.
*Not usually Included in TCO range; i.e., C8-C16.
NOTE: No information was reported concerning the number of peaks.
TABLE 2-83. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
CAFB SASS SAMPLES
MODULE RINSE
Volatile weight, ug/m3
Gas
Range
Run no. 1
Run no. 2
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
NR
8.95
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
19.4
6.20
NR
NR
NR
NR
4.12
NR
28.3
NR
NR = Not reported.
*Not usually included in TCO range; i.e., C8-C16.
NOTE: No information was reported concerning the number of peaks.
2-73
-------
TABLE 2-84. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
CAFB SASS SAMPLES
CONOENSATE
Gas
Range
Volatile weight, ug/m3
Run no. 1
Run no. 2
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
NR
4.88
91.4
NR
NR
0.232
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
9.62
158
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
18.4
NR
NR = Not reported.
*Not usually Included in TCO range; i.e., C8-C16.
NOTE: No information was reported concerning the number of peaks.
2-74
-------
TABLE 2-85. CAFB PARTICULATE
DATA MEASURED BY
MASS AMD SIZE EMISSIONS
SASS TRAIN
SASS-1
Parameter
Rate or value
Flue gas flow rate
Temperature at sampling port
Flue gas moisture
Total particulate loading
1100.3 dscfm
214° F
10.0%
0.9632 gr/dscf
Particle size fraction collected (urn)
<1 (filter)
>1
>3
Percent of total particulates
1.2
26.9
50.3
21.6
SASS-2
Parameter
Rate or value
Flue gas flow rate
Temperature at sampling port
Flue gas moisture
Total particulate loading
1271.6 dscfm
214° F
12.0%
1.1994 gr/dscf
Particle size fraction collected (urn)
<1 (filter)
>1
>3
Percent of total particulates
1.8
31.8
44.1
22.4
2-75
-------
TABLE 2-86. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
VENTURI SCRUBBER
(mg/m3)
Gas
GC1
GC2
GC3
GC4
GC5
GC6
GC7
Volatile
Range weight, ppm
0.8
1.1
NO
NO
0.4
0.6
2.4
No. of
peaks
1
1
0
0
1
2
2
NO = Not detected. Estimated minimum detectable con-
centration is 0.05 mg/m3.
TABLE 2-87. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
OXIDATION TANK VENT
(mg/m3)
Gas
GC1
GC2
GC3
GC4
GC5
GC6
GC7
Volatile
Range weight, ppm
1.2
2. 1
NO
NO
0.1
0.3
1.7
No. of
peaks
1
1
0
0
1
1
2
NO = Not detected. Estimated minimum detectable con-
centration is 0.05 mg/m3.
TABLE 2-88. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
TCA SCRUBBER
(mg/m3)
Gas
GC1
GC2
GC3
GC4
GC5
GC6
GC7
Volatile
Range weight, ppm
0.9
0.9
NO
NO
NO
0.3
1.7
No. of
peaks
1
1
0
0
0
1
2
NO = Not detected. Estimated minimum detectable con-
centration is 0.05 mg/m3.
2-76
-------
TABLE 2-89. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
SPENT STONE FROM REGENERATOR
Gas
GC7
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
Volatile No. of
weight, ppm peaks
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
0.60
NR
0.2
,. i
NR = Not reported.
2-77
-------
TABLE 2-90. TCO AND GRAV VALUES FOR ORGANIC SAMPLE
CAFB SASS Samples, Run No. 2
10-urn cyclone
TCO mg/m3
TCO +. GRAV Concentration
GRAV mg/m3 Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1 0.00631
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
0.0801
0.0864
cycle
TCO mg/m3
TCO + GRAV Concentration
GRAV mg/m3 Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1 0.0311
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
0.303
0.334
TCO ma/m
1-pm cyclone
TCO + GRAV Concentration
GRAV mg/m3 Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1 0.0208
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
0.102
0.123
Note: Data can be converted from mg/m3 to mg by multiplying the given number
by
266.291 dscf .
35.315 ft3/m3
2-78
-------
TABLE 2-91. TCO AND GRAV VALUES FOR ORGANIC SAMPLE
CAFB SASS Samples, Run No. 2
Particulate filter
TCO mg/m3
TCO + GRAV Concentration
GRAV mg/m3 Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
Total sample1 0.00435
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
Probe rinse
TCO mg/m3
GRAV mg/m3
TCO + GRAV
Total mg
Concentration
-mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
0.00435
XAD-2 resin
TCO mg/m3
TCO + GRAV Concentration
GRAV mg/m3 Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1 *
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
3.240'
3.2401
*Blank removes; sample less than or equal to blank.
T0nly the first three digits are significant.
Note: Data can be converted from mg/m3 to mg by multiplying the given number
by
266.291 dscf .
35.315 ft8/™-
2-79
-------
TABLE 2-92. TCO AND GRAY VALUES FOR ORGANIC SAMPLE
CAFB SASS Samples, Run No. 2
Module rinse
TCO mg/m3
TCO + GRAY Concentration
GRAY mg/m3 Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1 0.0580
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
18.000'
18.100'
Total sample1 0.186
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
Condensate
TCO mg/m3
GRAY mg/m3
TCO + GRAY
Total mg
Concentration
-mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
0.186
*Blank removes; sample less than or equal to blank.
T0nly the first three digits are significant.
Note: Data can be converted from mg/m3 to mg by multiplying the given number
by
266.291 dscf .
35.315 ftVm3
2-80
-------
TABLE 2-93. TCO AND 6RAV VALUES FOR ORGANIC SAMPLE
CAFB SASS Samples, Run No. 1
IO-JJIB cyclone
TCO mg/m3
GRAV mg/m2
TCO + GRAV
Total mg
Concentration
-mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1 0.00356
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
0.00356
Total sample1 0.00934
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
3-um cycle
TCO mg/m3
GRAV mg/m3
TCO + GRAV
Total mg
Concentration
-mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
0.00934
l-|jm cyclone
TCO + GRAV Concentration
Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)£
TCO mg/m3
GRAV mg/m3
Total sample1 0.00938
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
0.00938
*Blank removes; sample less than or equal to blank.
Note: Data can be converted from mg/m3 to mg by multiplying the given number
by
919.167 dscf
35.315 ftVrn3
2-81
-------
TABLE 2-94. TCO AND GRAV VALUES FOR ORGANIC SAMPLE
CAFB SASS Samples, Run No. 1
Participate filter
TCO rag/ms
TCO + GRAV Concentration
GRAV mg/m3 Total rag -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1 0.0133
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
0.0287
0.0420
TCO mg/m3
Probe rinse
TCO + GRAV Concentration
GRAV mg/m3 Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)s
Total sample1 0.00479
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
0.00479
XAD-2 resin
TCO mg/m3
GRAV mg/m3
TCO + GRAV Concentration
Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1 0.0750
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
0.467
0.542
*Blank removes; sample less than or equal to blank.
Note: Data can be converted from mg/m3 to mg by multiplying the given number
by
919.167 dscf .
35.315 ftVro3
2-82
-------
TABLE 2-95. TCO AND GRAV VALUES FOR ORGANIC SAMPLE
CAFB SASS Samples, Run No. 1
Module rinse
TCO mg/m3
TCO + GRAV Concentration
GRAV mg/m3 Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1 0.00895
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
0.0693
0.0783
TCO mg/m3
Condensate
GRAV mg/m3 Total mg
TCO + GRAV Concentration
Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1 0.0965
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
0.0965
*Blank removes; sample less than or equal to blank.
Note: Data can be converted from mg/m3 to mg by multiplying the given number
by
919.167 dscf .
35.315 fta/m3
2-83
-------
TABLE 2-96. TCO AND GRAV VALUES FOR ORGANIC SAMPLE
TOTAL ORGANIC EMISSIONS (C7-Ci6)
SASS Run #1
TCO mg/m3
TCO + GRAV Concentration
GRAV mg/m3 Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
0.221
0.565
0.786
SASS RUN
TCO mg/m3
TCO + GRAV Concentration
GRAV mg/m3 Total mg -mg/ (m3, L, or kg)5
Total sample1 0.307
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
21.725
22.032
Note: Data can be converted from mg/m3 to mg by multiplying the given number
by
919.167 dscf .
35.315 ft3/m3
2-84
-------
TABLE 2-97
LC FRACTIONATION
Spent stone from regenerator
Total Samplab
Tiktn for LCC
RMOvirtd
TCO
mi
0.80 mg/kg*
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
S
7
TCO'
mg
GRAV
mg
195 mg/kg*
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration9
mg/ (m3, L. or kg)
196
GRAV*
mg
TCO + GRAV
totil mg
Concentration8
mg/ (m3, L, or kg)
*Note that units were reported in mg/kg, rather than mg as specified for
Level 1 procedures.
'(Uattlty In •ntln lample. ditirmintd bafora LC.
'Parian of wholi umpla uud for LC. Ktuil mg.
'ttuntftv recovered from LC column, actual mg.
"Total m| computed back to total sample.
>J Valmsiapplitd for both tampla stae and concantration.
'Notdatactable.
2-85
-------
TABLE 2-98
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: SASS run #1, condensate (IR spectra from GRAV residue of unfractlonated samolp)
Wtvt Number
(em'1)
NR
NR
Intusfty
medium
minor
Asdinmrnt/Commfnts
al i phati c hydrocarbons
esters,* ketones,*
possible: ethers,* organosllicon compounds,
nltrocompounds, substituted aromatics
OTHER REMARKS:
*May be saturated, unsaturated, aryl.
NR = not reported.
2-86
-------
TABLE 2-99
IR REPORT
. SASS run #1, module rinse (IR spectra from GRAV residue of unfractionated sample)
Wm Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
Intimity
minor
trace
Assignment/Comments
esters*
possible: aliphatic ethers
ITHER REMARKS:
*May be saturated, unsaturated, aryl.
NR = not reported.
2-87
-------
TABLE 2-100
IR REPORT
SAMPLE- SASS run #1, 1 u cyclone (IR spectra from GRAV residue of unfractionated san
Wmt Nwnbir
(em'1)
NR
NR
Intimity
minor
trace
AttignmMt/Commtnts
saturated esters
saturated hydrocarbons
possible: aryl or unsaturated esters or ethers
'Pie)
OTHER REMARKS:
NR = not reported.
2-88
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 2-101
IR REPORT
SASS run #1, 3 y cyclone (IR spectra from GRAY residue of unfractionated sample)
WDM Numbtf
(em'1)
NR
Intimity
trace
Asiigflmtnt/Commtntt
saturated esters,
possible: aryl or unsaturated esters or
ethers, organosilicon compounds
ITHER REMARKS:
NR = not reported.
2-89
-------
TABLE 2-102
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: SASS Run #2, XAD-2 resin (IR spectra from GRAV residue of unfractionated^
Wm Nurnbtr
(cm'1)
NR
NR
Intimity
medium
minor
AufcfliMfit/CtmintRti
Arvl or unsaturated esters
Ketones*
Hydrocarbons
Possible:
Nltro compounds
Ethers
OTHER REMARKS:
*May be saturated, unsaturated, and/or aryl
NR = not reported.
2-90
-------
WtfLE:
TABLE 2-103
IR REPORT
,. SASS run #2, module rinse (IR spectra from GRAY residue of unfractionated sample]
(fan Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
Inttnsity
minor
trace
AttJflttmtnt/Commantt
aliphatic hydrocarbons
esters*
possible:
aromatic hydrocarbons
saturated ketones,
possible: ethers
RKR REMARKS:
*May be saturated, unsaturated. and/or aryl
NR = not reported.
2-91
-------
TABLE 2-104
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: SASS run #2. condensate (IR spectra from GRAV residue of unfractlonated
WmNwnbtr
(em'1)
Intimity
Asd|iiiMfit/C«mmMrts
NR
trace
aliphatic ethers
'=,
OTHER REMARKS:
NR - not reported.
2-92
-------
TABLE 2-105
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: SASS run 12, probe rinse (IR spectra from GRAV residue of unfractionated sample)
ffm Numbir
Ion'1)
NR
InttntJty
medium
minor
AnlinrMnt/Commints
saturated hydrocarbons, saturated esters
aryl esters,
possible: substituted aromatics,
aliphatic ethers
IttR REMARKS:
NR a not reported.
2-93
-------
The blank removed the IR Spectrum In the following samples:
SASS run no. 1, probe rinse
SASS run no. 1, particulate filter
SASS run no. 1, 10 y cyclone
SASS run no. 2, particulate filter
SASS run no. 2, 1 y cyclone
SASS run no. 2, 3 y cyclone
SASS run no. 2, 10 y cyclone
2-94
-------
TABLE 2-106
IR REPORT
NKE: 2-MR, LC Fractionation (6RAV Re^dUe nf
Run ? Mnrinlo p-i|
LC Fractions)
ImNambtr.
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
JR ° not rep
_* Blank remo
Intimity
Minor
Minor
Minor
Trace
Trace
Trace
Medium
Mi nor
Trace
Mi nor
Trace
Minor
Trace
orted
YCS IR spectrum
Assignment/Comments
aliphatic hydrnrarhnnc
esters (saturatpd, ifns.
aromatic hydrocarbons
saturated ketones
ethers (possible)
atnratPri prul>
(possible^
LC Fraction
1 aUphaMr hyH™^rbcns
?*
3*
4 esters (saturatprt)
esters (unsaturated,
ethers (possible)
5 esters (saturatoH)
esters (unsaturatpri,
6 esters (saturated)
esters (unsaturated.
7 etfters (saturated)
arvl )
aryl )
arvl )
"« REMARKS:
2-95
-------
TABLE 2-107
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: iVW-fc Ittttlll. Mr 1 1 iH.l.iiiiiiiuun -— -—- —
(GRAV Residue of XAD-2 Resin Extract, SASS Run n) paqe i Of 2
WmNumbtr
(em*1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
frR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
MR
NR
Intimity
Medi urn
Medi urn
Medi urn
Minor
Minor
Medium
Minor
Trace
Trace
Trace
Trace
Minor
TVara
Trace
Major
Mai or
Medium
Medi urn
Medium
heriium
AnignnMt/CemmMts
Arvl or unsaturated esiersj
Ketones
Hydrocarbons
Ni frn-rnrnpnimHc (possihlff) — -
Lthers (oossiblei
LC fraction
1 aliohatic hydrocarbons
aromatic hydrocarbons
esters (arvl or unsaturated)
ethers (possible)
2 hydrocarbons _
saturated ethers (oossible)
3 esters
saturated hydrocarbons (pn*«dMp) _ — __
ethers
4 §
S S
> esters
kptnn»»«;
amines (possible)
alcohol s/Dhenols (oossible)
ethers (possible
nitroeompounds (pnccihlo)
amines (nn«ihlp)
OTHER REMARKS:
(continued)
2-96
-------
TABLE 2-107 (continued)
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: XAb-2 Resin,* LC Fractional on
(GRAV Residue of XAD-2 Resin Lxtract, SASS Run #2) Paap ? nf ?
Wnt Numbtr
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR = .not de
Intimity
Medium
Medium
Minor
Minor
tected
Assignmcnt/Commants
LC Fraction
7 unsaturated esters
saturated and unsaturated ketones
8 ethers (possible)
nitrocomoounds (possible)
OTHER REMARKS:
fract1ons are stronger than the spectrum of the unfractionated
nthe spectrum of
be saturated, unsaturated, and/or aryl.
sBlank removes IR spectra.
2-97
-------
TABLE 2-108
IR REPORT
SAMPLE- Spent stone from regenerator
Wtvi Numbtr
(cm'1)
NR
Intensity
Minor
Asiignmint/Commcnts
Aryl and unsaturated esters and ethers
OTHER REMARKS:
NR = Not reported.
2-98
-------
TABLE 2-109
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: SASS run #1. XAD-2 resin (IR spectra from GRAV residue of unfractlonated sample)
Wivt Numbir
(em'1)
NR
NR
Intimity
medi urn
mjnor
Anignmfnt/Camnwnti
esters.*
saturated hydrocarbons
possible iritrosubstituted compounds, ethers
.
OTHER REMARKS:
*May be saturated, unsaturated, aryl.
NR = not reported.
2-99
-------
TABLE 2-110 . SUMMARY OF TRACE ELEMENT DATA
o
o
Trace
eleven t
Pb
Ba
Sb
Cd
Zr
Sr
Br
A.
Zn
Cu
Hi
Cr
V
Ti
S
P
Si
Mg
B
Be
Li
Co
Mn
Lignite fuel feed
(pp.)
CAFB
1197
9.6
38
0.30
0.17
5.9
37
0.23
1.5
13
15
23
2.7
14
230
0.23Z
42
HC
130Z
21
0.03
0.82
0.50
22
Site
A
1.7
110
0.055
0.28
0.37
38
3.3
2.6
10
62
4
0.48
0.56
9.3
0.23Z
14
170
420
6.3
0.018
0.26
0.089
11.0
data
Site
B
2.3
7.0
<0.22
<0.39
0.35
46
3.2
0.48
15.0
7.1
48
0.61
0.87
15.0
1.4Z
8.6
420
840
8.9
0.037
0.17
13.0
Flue gas emsiions (ug/m3)
CAFB
SASS-1
200
2,800
7.2
5.4
510
2.600
160
650
860
180
230
110
310
13.000
-
1,600
230,000
16,000
4,300
14
TO
48
1,700
SASS-2
310
5.100
18
15
540
5,000
19O
l.OOO
1.900
260
380
330
430
14 ,000
220,000
1,600
-
15,000
3,100
3.8
60
44
2,000
Site
A
320
200,000
40
33
1,300
41,000
210
1,600
880
470
1,400
470
470
28 ,000
160,000
16,000
-
MC
140,000
10
570
100
27,000
Site
B
l.l to 8.5
'28
< 0.5
0.9 to 2.1
0.3
<10
<43
< 4.2
13 to 31
<36
<69
< 4.2
< 1.1
< 3.5
1400 to 7700
<46
180
160
64
0.2
<0.3
<0.3
<7.8
Solid basis (pp>)
CAFB
SASS-1
90.5
1,268
3.3
2.4
231
1,177
72.4
294
389
81.5
104
49.8
140
5,885
-
724
104,100
7,243
1,946
6.3
SASS-2
113
1,018
2.6
2.0
196
1,618
69.1
364
691
94.6
138
120
156
5,091
80,000
582
-
5,455
1,127
1.4
21.8
Site
A
37.
23,585
4.
3.
153
4,835
24.
189
104
55
165
55
55
3,302
18,868
1,887
-
-
16,509
1
67
7
7
9
.8
.4
•<•
.4
.2
.2
Hate: ND • not determined; HC " MJor coaponcnt.
-------
ADDITIONAL DATA
2-101
-------
TABLE 3. CAFB PARTICULATE TEST DATA
ro
i
o
rv>
Test No.
RAC-1
SASS-1
RAC-2
SASS-2
RAC-3
RAC-4
RAC-5
Date
1/24
1/24
1/25
1/26
1/26
1/27
1/27
0**
(dscfm)
1200.7
1100.3
1388.1
1271.6
1346.7
1422.7
1053.8
Qaf
(acfm)
1463.3
1590.0
1891.6
1878.0
1844.6
1972.8
1536.0
Moisture
(%)
7.1
10.0
6.6
12.1
9.0
4.5
9.4
E.A.*
(*)
39.9
53.6
67.1
53.6
53.6
29.4
28.0
Part.
loading
(gr/dscf)
1.0381
0.9632
1.5291
1.1994
0.9906
0.8520
0.7917
Vmstd1
(dscf)
29.525
919.167
32.740
266.291
32.876
26.318
24.630
Test
Part.
SASS
Part.
SASS
Part.
Part.
Part.
design
; so2/so3
; organics
; S02/S03
; organics
; S02/S03
Qs - Stack flow rate at dry standard conditions.
'Q_ - Stack flow rate at actual stack conditions.
t
5
E.A. - Calculated excess air.
~ Volume of flue gas sampled at dry standard conditions.
-------
TABLE 9. TOTAL >C6 ORGANIC EMISSIONS (ug/m3)
TCO*
Gravimetric
Total
SASS No.l
221
565
786
SASS No. 2
307
21,725
22,032
Tenax
290
5,050
5,340
Tenax
1,070
17,200
18,270
Particulate
360
2,540
2,900
Total Chromatographable Organics (C7-Cig B.P. Equivalents).
TABLE 12. ORGANIC EMISSIONS IN
CAFB RAC SAMPLES
(Ug/m3)
IAE*
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
TCO
Grav.
TO
Tenax:
RAC-2
-
-
41.8
115
-
32.4
8.53
12.7
82.7
-
290
5050
5340
Tenax ; Particulate :
RAC -4 RAC 1-5
5.53
28.8
230 324
731
13.4 7.17
17.4
-
'. -
60.7
10.5
1070 360
17200 2540
18300 2900
Individual alkane equivalents.
2-103
-------
TABLE 15. INTERPRETATION OF IR SPECTRA FROM GRAVIMETRIC RESIDUES OF RAC SAMPLE EXTRACTS
WITHOUT LC FRACTIONS
ro
i
Sample code
Major
Medium
Minor
Trace
RAC-2, Tenax Amides
(primary,
secondary)
RAC-4, Tenax Hydrocarbons,*
esters,* ketones;*
possible: alcohols/
phenols, amines,*
amides
RAC 1-5,
Particulate
Ethers, hydrocarbons;
possible: amines,*
alcohols/phenols
Esters,* ketones*
saturated hydrocarbons;
possible: ethers,*
organosilicon compounds,
substituted aromatica
Possible:
organo-
silicon compounds
Possible: ethers
Possible:
esters.
ketones
May be saturated, unsaturated, aryl.
-------
i
i-*
o
TABLE 18. INTERPRETATION OF IR SPECTRA FROM
EXTRACT AND ITS LC FRACTIONS, RAC
GRAVIMETRIC RESIDUES OF TENAX RESIN
RUN No. A
Sample M-jor Medium
code
Weight
Minor Trace diatribution
(percent)
*. inn^
IAC, Tenax Hydrocarbons,
esters,* ketones;*
possible: alcohols/
phenol*, amines,*
amides,* ethers*
LC-1
LC-2
LC-3
LC-A
LC-5
LC-6
LC-7
Saturated hydrocarbon*
Saturated hydrocarbon*
Substituted aromatic*,
eater*;* possible: aninea.*
aside*.* ether*. uniaturited
alcohol*
E*tera;* poaaiblg:
anidea, aadnea, ether a
Ester*." ketones;*
possible: amides.*«|
aaloes.**^ ethers,*-*
alcohols/phenola*
Kntorn.* kctonc«;
posiilble: aaldcx, •
amines,*'* ethers,**^
alcohols/phenols'
Aromatic
hydrocarbon*
Foaaible:
nitro-
aubitituted
compound*,
phenol*
Poaaible:
uaaaturated
alcohol*,
nitroaubatitutcd
compound*
Aryl or vinyl
ether*
Dbaaturated
hydrocarbon*
Ketonea,* eater*;
po**ible: ether*,*
phenol*, aminea,*.t
8.8
0.2
11.4
21. *
36.6
18.3
3.0
May be saturated, uncaturated. and/or aryl.
Column percent recovery: 114 percent.
TMay possess an isopropyl group attached to N or 0.
-------
TABLE 24. RAC-L TRACE ELEMENT EMISSIONS
ELEMENT
CULOtE
CATC"
t"G)
U
TM
HI
PR
TL
A U <
in <
OS <
"t
4
Mf <
LU
T8
TM
ER
MO
Or
T8
CO
EU
3"
NO
PR
Cl
LA
BA
CS
I
TE <
SB
3N
CO
PD «
BH <
MJ <
MO
0.00)2
0.006)
0.0005
0.017
0.0065
0.0002
0.
o.
0.
0.
0.
0.
9.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
ft.
0.
0.
0.
9.
0.
0.
0.
000)
000)
0005
0002
00)0
oooa
001)
000%
001)
0001
0001
0002
0006
OOOa
0011
0028
0009
009S
Oil
I 9
000)
'ILTER
CATCH
1-5)
0.0088
0.018
0.005)
O.OUO
0.000)
0.000)
0.0005
0 .0006
0.0029
0.0028
0.0060
0.00)4
0.0017
0.0007
0.00)0
0.00 10
0.0078
0.0001
0.0020
0.00 16
0.00)6
0.012
0.0051
n.02T
0.0)8
0.71
A. 0012
0016 < 0.001 1
0011 «
0007
0012
0002
0010 <
0002 <
0.0001 <
0.0009
N« 0.0057
0.0025
0.0015
0.0068
0.0006
0.0019
0.0001
0.000)
0.0018
0.016
;» o.o&5 0.22
* 0.01?
s» o.uu
98 0.0057
BR
3E
AS
GE <
GA
0.012 <
O.OOUU <
0.0
M
0.0075 «
0.012 <
ZN O.S6
cu
NI
CO
ri
rt.020
0.79
O.OOU4
25.
"N 0,5)
CH
V
TI
CA
H
3
P
31
AL
MC
NA
8
BE
LI
0.01«
O.OM
1.6
1).
I .)
?* .
1
0.0)1
'5«
2. )
1.2
O.I
00
0.15
0.0004
0.0060
0.016
1.61
0.016
0.009)
0.0086
0.0070
0.0077
0.068
0.0
-------
TABLE 25, RAC-2 TRACE ELEMENT EMISSIONS
.E»CH
u
TM
tl
PB
TL
•u
l»
03
•I
N
MF
LU
V8
TN
£R
MO
DV
TB
CO
eu
3M
NO
PR
CE
L»
8*
C3
I
Tl
SB
3N
CO
PO
RH
«
0.02«
0.0100
1.018
0.047
0.01)
0.12
0.16
0.16
0.012
0.00*1
1?.
0.4|
0.062
0.20
T.9
110.
1.2
II.
0.4«
67.
II.
*».
n.»4i
0.17
0.0012
0.027
TOT»L
IUC
f-ISSICS
FOUND
(XC/03C")
4
4
4
<
0.000)
4
4
4
<
4
4
4
0.0001
4
4
4
4
4
0.0076
0.01*
O.OOSO
O.I )
0.00)9
0.0006
0.0009
O.OQIO
TO 0.4040
0.0022
0.0011
0.0007
0.00)6
0.0015
0.0057
0.00)0
0.0018
TO 0.0026
0.0012
0.0010
0.0057
0.01T
0.0079
0.065
0.047
t.B
0.0021
0.4004
0.0049
0.012
0.017
o.au
0.0021
0.000)
0.0006
0.009*.
0.012
O.I 7
0.020
2.2
0.0001
.0079
.019
.OOS2
.1"
.0041
.0006
.0009
.0010
Til 0.00"?
.0021
.0011
.0007
o.oie
0.022
0.054
0.024
0.15
0.52
0.20
0.017
0.0100
21.
0.61
0.068
0.24
a.)
140.
1,6
50.
0.5)
74.
I).
?«.
0.97
0.42
0.0014
0.029
0.0001
4 0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
4 0
0
0
0
4 0
4 0
.0016
.0060
.noli
.oota
TO 0.0027
.00)4
.0010
.0059
.01*
.00fl2
.068
.049
.«
.0021
.0046
.0051
.013
.018
.Oil
.0022
.0003
< 0.0006
0.0094
0.01)
0. IP
0.021
?.2
0.02«
0.019
0.02)
0.057
0.025
0.14
0.54
0.20
0.018
0.011
21.
0.6)
n.on
0.25
«.T
ISO.
1.7
60.
0.55
7».
ID.
29.
1.0
0.4)
O.OtIS
0.0)1
2-107
-------
TABLE 28. QUANTIFICATION DATA FROM ESCA ANALYSES OF
RAC TRAIN PARTICULATE FILTERS (RESULTS IN
PERCENT ATOMIC)
Element
0
C
Ca
Na
S
Si
AI
RAC-1
55.5
19.3
5.3
-
4.1
6.8
9.0
RAC-2
49.1
24.1
4.8
1.3
3.9
5.9
10.9
RAC-3
54.6
23.4
4.2
-
4.9
5.4
7.5
RAC-4
51.9
23.9
3.5
-
3.5
7.9
9.3
RAC-5
51.4
27:4
5.0
-
3.2
6.6
6.3
2-108
-------
TABLE 29. ELEMENTAL QUANTIFICATION DATA FOR SASS PARTICULATE SAMPLES FROM ESCA ANALYSIS;
RESULTS IN PERCENT ATOMIC
ro
i
o
UD
SASS run No. 1
Element
0
C
Ca
Na
S
Si
Al
Particulate
filter
43.1
26.9
12.8
0.6
4.7
5.7
6.3
In cyclone
44.5
28.9
9.2
0.7
6.9
4.8
5.0
3ji cyclone
47.3
29.4
4.3
0.8
6.1
6.1
6.0
lOy cyclone
48.6
30.0
3.3
0.6
7.7
4.4
5.4
Particulate .
filter
33.0
52.3
2.8
1.0
3.7
2.5
4.6
SASS run No. 2
LM cyclone 3y cyclone
* 55.0
* 25.8
* 3.3
* 0.8
* 6.3
* 4.2
* 4.7
lOji cyclone
53.9
24.4
4.8
-
10.5
2.4
4.0
Calculations were not made due to high background in spectrum attributed to substrate.
-------
c.o r
£ i.o •
0.1
0.4
O.ft
0 t 4 • •
10 It 14
CTCMID)
to
Figure 18. Depth profile of sulfur in SASS-1 filter particulate
1.0 tOM
u
«»
M
OJtt
Figure 19. Depth profile of sulfur in SASS-2 filter particulate
2-110
-------
WAVELENGTH, «lc>Ml
4000 3500 MOO Z900 2000 1800 1600 1400 ItOO 1000 BOO 600 400 200
Figure 7. IR spectrum of XAD-2 resin froro SASS-1. Major peaks
indicate esters, saturated hydrocarbons; possible
ethers and nitrosubstituted compounds.
WAVELENGTH, »itr««
4000
' II I I I
1800 1600
FREQUENCY,
Figure 8. IR spectrum of XAD-2 resin from SASS-2. Major peaks
indicate aryl or unsaturated esters, ketones, hydro-
carbons; possible ethers and nitrocompounds.
2-111
-------
TABLE 30. SAM/IA WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL 1 - ESSO, ENGLAND, CAFB PILOT PLANT
SAM/IA WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL 1 Form IA02 Uv«J 1
1 SOORCt/CONTTKX OPTION
ESSO, England, CAFB Pilot Plant
2 EFFLUENT STREAM
101 Flu* Gas
COOt • MAMI
P*»t 1
3 EfFtuENT STREAM FLOW SAH
1(4* e m
4 COMPUTE THE FOU OWING TABLE FO* THE EFFLUENT STREAM Of LINE 2 (USE BACK Of
A
_,~o~
UNITS
Cl i
C?
NO
NO
S0?
SO,
CO
C02
e
flACIOI
Ug/m3
9.0E3
2.0E3
2.8E4
3.7E4
5.1E5
3.2E3
<5.7E5
1.4E8
C
M»Tf
COCK
Kg/B3
3.3E5
5.3E6
9.0E3
9.0E3
1 . 3E4
N
4.0E4
9.0E6
C
OMCiM
Mg/n3
1.0
1.1E5
M
N
N
N
I.2E5
H
E
tB'CI
-
0.03
0 . 0004
3. 1
4. 1
39.2
<14.3
15.6
F
OtttHAl
HlAtTH UJkrt
-
-
-
/tec - bQuul - l/«t - uhd w»o» - i/uc)
FOAM FCW SCRAlCH OOKK)
G
OtCRli 0<
ucuioduu
S-Cl
-
9,
0.
000
02
4.
75
H
ONOAM
-
2
2
I
MAIt
-
/
,•'
/
r/
t
J
ceo
UA«M*»C£ «Ar«
EuSlOi
IE . .orf 1.
0.02
0.0002
1 .84
2,44
23 52
8.51
9.28
^lAStOt
5.355
0.01
7-83
* m*i irta a *ctija> mi A ct»
-------
TABLE 31. SAM/IA WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL I - ESSO, ENGLAND, CAFB PILOT PLANT, SASS-1
SAU/IA VOMCSHEFT FOR l£VCL 1 Form IA02 Uwl 1
ro
1 SOUBCC/CONTMX OPTION p^ , ,
ESSO, England, CAFB Pilot Plant. SASS-1
2 EFFLUENT STREAM } EFftUENT STREAM FlO* RAU
101 Ft,,. g»t 0- °'52 aJ/*«c
CDOtl HM« (S« * m'/icc - Kju.0 * i/«c - MUNI **n« » f/uc)
4 COMPLETE TH£ FOLLOWING TABLE FOR THE EJTIUENT STREAM OF UNE 2 (USE BACK OF FORM KM SCRATCH MONK)
A
iu*vc nuciON
UMTS
U
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Au
Ir
Os
Re
W
Hf
tu
Yb
TDI
B
rucid*
CMUH
nut ION
ug/o-
16
46
0.6-35
200
< 2.1
< 2.1
< 3.2
< 3.5
< 2.2
< 6.1
<24
< 6.2
< 5.9
< 1.1
C F D
•<*tln
tun
COMCXH
nutoi
4.1E2
1.5E2
N
1.0E3
[iCOLOCICAt
tun
COMCJN
turoi
N
N
N
N
E
KGttia
HA1MO
(MOaim
tf'Cl
-
001-.085
<0.014
<0.006
f
ODOMM.
nmioi IM
H1MTH UAfC
TABlf
-
G
ixcmi a
HA:U>O
iCCOlOClCMl
I8'0.
-
M
CHOMW
rouioi »
(COt MATE
Mfei
-
1
v *
•«•«'<«
lull
KCU9U)
-
J
v'*
tea
•UK
fKUDCD
-
K
L
me ami OISCMUKX urt
VAMtH
•MCOl
II 1 LJM 11
0005-.04
<0.01
<0.003
KCOIOCICAI
SAUOt
IG • LWC 1)
• MM ma a NHUCO. ua * comwuMw »«7
5 EfFlUENT STREAM DEGREE Of MAMRO
KALTH MATE BASED ff OK £1 5* "513
ECaOOCAL MATE BASID (I COL Gl 5t 310
(ENTER HERE AND AT LINE 8
FORM IA01)
6 NUlfeCF
COMPAR
HEALTH 61
ECOLOCIC<
1 OF ENTRIES 7 TC
ED TO MATES ^
31 Ef
1 ^n 1 (F
MOC UNIT DISCHARGE SUM
:ALTH MATE BASED a COL x>
LOGICAL MATE BASED a COL
NTEft HERE AND AT LINE §. FOI
i, -267
If7h 161
tu MOD
-------
I
I-1
h->
-C»
TABLE 31 (continued). SAM/IA WORKSHEET FOR LEVEt" I
COHTWUATIO* IHOT fO» ITIM MO 4 HMM UM. UVU 1
- ESSO. ENGLAND, CAFB PILOT PLANT, SASS-1
SOUfttt CONTROL O^-A" ESSO, England, CAFB Pilot Pl«at, SASS-1 EffiuENT STREAM SO 101
A
vu*u FUCUM
UMltS
Er
Ho
Dv
Tb
Cd
Eu
So
Hd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
1
Te
Sb
Sn
Cd
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
y
B
fWCTIOM
cwct*
TMICH
Ug/«J
< 6.9
<0.1-2.3
0.7-9.4
< 0.3
^ 'i.fe
0.6-3.4
3.3-16.0
31
10
98
200
2,800
3.7
!.3
8.8
7.2
71
5.4
7 9
0.9
< 1 .9
6.4
81
510
120
c
tCMTx
iun
OX3X
IIUIOM
9.3E3
5.3E4
N
5.1E4
3.7E4
1.1E5
5.0E2
1.0E2
5.0E2
N
1.0E1
5.0EJ
0
[C(XO&CAl
tun
OXCJ-i
TMTUH
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
E
OCGMf Of
HUAUD
(HOU.TH)
(•/O
<0.001
<0.0003
3.0002
X0026
X0018
>.6
).088
).014
).54
).002
f
Offtau.
rasiTiCM M
HCM.IM Hill
>MU
—
G
OCG»U OF
HJUAJkO
(tcoioacu.)
IVO)
—
H
OKMM
KXtno*»
tax tun
Ttau
—
1
v f
•01. !H
mn
jldtflfO
—
/
J
I OX
KUTC
ucuoco
—
K
L
TOUC UNf OISCMUKC AATC
(KMI«
BASED)
(t ILMC*
<0.0005
<0. 00002
0.0001
O.OO14
O.OO09
2.91
0.046
O.OO7
f> . 2 S. \
0.001
(UXLCOCAl.
«X5£tH
1C • LMt 1)
-------
TABLE 31 (continued). SAM/IA WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL I - ESSO, ENGLAND, CAFB PILOT PLANT, SASS-1
connmuma* «XCT ro* ITU MO 4. mat uu. uw i
ro
i
SOuflCE'COftTMX. 0"1iOM ESSO. EnftUnd. CAFB Pilot Plant. SASS-1 IFfLUf NT STMAM NO 101
A
vuvunxta
UMTS
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
C*
Ca
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Hn
Cr
V
Ti
Ca
K
S
t
Si
A I
>'S
Ka
B
Be
a
flUCTKM
II COfUt
ntioi
W*/-3
?,600
50
160
0.6-75
650
6.2-33
170
860
180
230
48
-
1,700
110
310
13,000
210,000
11,000
-
1.600
230,000
-
16,000
-
4.300
14
C
MM.TH
IUTC
C9CIM
tUtOl
3.1E3
2.0E2
2.0
5.6E2
5.0E3
4.0E3
2.0E2
1.5E1
5.0E1
5.0E3
1
5.0E2
6.0E3
N
I.OE2
1.0E4
5.2E3
6.0E3
5.3E4
3.1E3
2.0
0
toxoaoi
HUE
CONCCM
MATCH
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
I
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
E
Honor
HAUJO
•ULT*
«/a
—
0.839
.003-. 37
325
.011-. 05
0.034
0.215
0.90
15.33
0.96
0.34
10
0.62
2.17
16
23
2.67
1.387
7
r
OWWAl
•ObTKJNW
MCA1.TH MAI
>*au
—
G
OCCMI d
KXiUtO
(tCOiOCKJk
im/oi
—
•
310
H
(MOHUl
H&laim
con Mtrt
TMLC
_
1
S*
•*mt«
H*U
f^^fnffk
/
j
J
J
j
/
/
J
«. «
rca
H*H
ticutm
^^
i
«
HIM UMt B
<^*l»H
MSEDI
a • CM i>
n 436
<0.195 i
169
<0.031
0.018
0.112
0.468
7.97
0.50
57 2
0 322
1.128
8 32
11.96
1.388
0.721
3.64
t
HCnMCC MK
itcoioaCM
•uu»
161
-------
TABLE 32. SAM/IA WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL I - ESSO, ENGLAND, CAFB PILOT PLANT, SASS-2
SAM/U WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL 1 form IA02
I
(-J
M
O>
1 SOURCE/CONTROL OfTOM Piec - MMid w«tc * |/MC)
4 COMPUTE THE FOLLOWING TABLE FOR THE EFFLUENT STREAM OF UNE 2 (USE BACK Of FORM FOR SCRATCH WOMQ
A
^.^
UNITS
U
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Au
Ir
Os
Re
U
Hf
Lu
Yb
Ta
B
nHci«M
cotan
\ipfm^
13
35
0.5-28
310
< 13
< 13
< 20
< 22
< 14
< 23
< 49
< 13
< 12
< 5.8
C
KAlIM
u*n
COCtK
4.1E2
1.5E2
N
1.0E3
0
ICaOGJCM
MAT!
COMUN
TMTKM
H
N
N
N
E
MCMI Of
HAJJJW
tf«MlH|
-
.001-. 06f
<0.087
<0.023
F
OKMM.
HtMlH IUK
-
G
otc«f ( a
.1 0,
-
H
omwu.
rowiom
lax wn
i«au
-
1
kUU
-
j
[COl
MATC
-
« 1 L
f(»C UMT BACHMCt MH
IXMTH
•AStOt
(I • UNf 11
-------
ro
i
TABLE 32 (continued).
COMTINUATKM SMUT fOt
SAM/1A WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL
NO 4. rOMf IM2. UVU I
I - ESSO, ENGLAND, CAFB PILOT PLANT, SASS-2
SftuBCf/rofciBoi ooTtf* ESSO. England, CAFR Pilot Plant, SASS-2 tm.u£NT SUKAU MO »«1
A
MMUnucra
UMTS
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Cd
Eu
SB
Hd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
C«
I
Te
Sb
Sn
Cd
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
y
Sr
8
mcnm
COCIK
tWTOI
Kg/-3
< 18
< 6.2
' 19
< 2.2
< 14
<0. 1-8.1
1.1-31
17-44
11
97
200
5,100
3.5
2.7-12
0.1-15
18
18-400
2.0-27
< 16
< 3.9
< 13
12
78
540
87
5,000
c
MMTM
wtn
OMXk
n*r«M
9.3E3
5.3E4
N
S.1E4
3.7E4
1.1E5
5.0E2
1.0E2
5.0E2
N
l.OE!
5.0E3
3.1E3
0
KCOtO&CM
•Mil
COKXO
mtroi
II
N
N
N
N
N
H
N
H
N
N
N
N
C
occaaor
HU*ao
(HOUTH)
(•A3
<0.002
<0.001
0.0002
0.003
0.002
10.2
.001-. 15
0.036
0.2-2.7
0.002
1.613
T
OttlML
KKIIKM1H
HDHIMIUK
ItfLl
—
c
Of CMC 01
M1**O
(icaociCAi)
a/n
—
H
omwi
•osmai*
(CO. wini
I*«U
—
1
x *
tAUln
tutt
f^TfTOr-
/
t
/
J
i
\ tf
COX
Mill
uatoco
—
K
lOnc u— 10
(MMtH
•ucn
tti UK »
<0.0012
< 0.0006
0.00012
0.00018
0.00012
6.12
<0.09
0.022
<1.62
0.0012
0.963
L
acMactMTi
gnxoacn
i*J£D)
1C HMf I)
-------
TABLE 32 (continued). SAM/1A WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL I - ESSO, ENGLAND, CAFB PILOT PLANT, SASS-2
SHUT roc ITU* KO *. rom uez, uvu i ?,„
ro
i
CD
SOO«C£ CO»IPWOC*
muTs
Rb
Br
Se
As
G«
Ca
Zn
Cu
Hi
Co
F*
Mn
Cr
V
Ti
Ca
K
S
P
Si
Al
*S
Na
B
Be
Li
B
rwciKM
CONCIH
TUT KM
ug/»3
63
190
U-160
1,000
si
260
1.900
260
130-630
44
-
2,000
330
430
14,000
-
7.700
220,000
1,600
-
-
15,000
100-14,000
3,100
3.3
60
C
our*
UATl
COCtk
mien
2.0E2
2.0
5.6E2
5.0E3
4.0E3
2.0E2
1.5E1
5.0E1
5.0E3
1
5.0E2
6.0E3
H
1.0E2
1.0E4
5.2E3
6.0E3
5.3E4
3.1E3
2.0
2.2E1
0
EOXOOOl
UiTt
COMCIS
TS-MC*
H
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
fcT
N
N
£
CXOMl Of
HA2AIO
<>«€JUTM>
W'O
—
.07-0.80
500
0.052
0.475
1.30
8.67-42
0.88
0.4
330
0.86
2.33
16
2.5
.094-. 264
1
1.9
2.73
r
OmMM
*US!KX ,N
MCJU.TM IftATt
I«*I
G
ixoni or
HJOAtH)
lt£XXOGrfCMr
<8^0»
—
430
H
oevut
KBZTXM M
tax u»n
u*J
__
1
v' tf
KtAlIM
«b«U
EXCCIMO
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
,
/
^
/
r
j
\ tf
tea
UATt
(UXECfO
—
K
IOUCLJ01 K
<*C**TH
WiQM
It > UNt 9
<0.48
300
0.031
0.285
0.78
<25.2
0.528
0.24
198
0.516
1.398
9.6
1 .5
<0.!58
0.6
1.14
1.638
L n
sCHXcrj «*rt
ItUXOCJCAi
BA5tDt
EC > '-*" SI
258
-------
TABLE 33. SAM/1A WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL I - CONVENTIONAL LIGNITE BOILER WITH MULTICLONE
SITE A
SAM/1A WORKSHEET fOU LEVEL 1 Form IA02
i souKX/coNTnot omoM Pfft ,
Conventional Lignite Boiler With Mul tic lone - site A
2 EFFLUENT STREAM J £Ff LUtXT STIKAM FLOW RATE
mi F1 r 1" 27'9 «3/»ec
LlHK V HMC (f* * •!*/!•*£ — hQtfwg * l/MC — 10M wMt4 * C/MC)
4 COMPLETE THE FOUOWM6 TABU FOR THE CTFLUCMT STREAM OF LINE 2 (USE 8A« OF FORM KM SCRATCH WORK)
A
„
UNITS
U
Th
Bl
Pb
Tl
Au
It
°«
Re
W
Hf
Lv
Yb
Tm
B
COKUt
nuroi
56
74
2.6
320
<8.3
< 4.1
< 6.3
< 7.0
<4.5
6.2-33
<13
<3
<3.2
<2.5
C
tun
text*
»g/-3
4.1E2
1.5E2
N
1.0E3
0
ICOtOOCii
COMCtN
N
H
N
N
£
MCMt O«
-
).006
<.055
.006-. C33,
F
KMIM lur[
i«atc
-
G
auMt or
-
H
CMMM
KaMKMM
ICO. M»Il
-
1
%.' *
ttfUTn
M»H
tictcoco
-
i
fen
(KXtOCO
-
» MOM ifHa. « NUUCO ua * coMMutnoH Men
5 EFFLUENT STREAM DEGREE Of HAZARD
HEALTH MATE BASED O COt O 5» < 2032
ECOLOGICAL MATE BASED a COL G) 5t> 47°
(ENTER HERE AMD AT LINE 8
FORM IA01)
6 NUMBED
COMPAR
HEALTH 6«
ECOLOGlCA
OF ENTRIES 7 TC
ED TO MATES H(
30
I Sn (E
«JC UNIT DISCHARGE SUM
LALTH MATE BASED (1 COL K)
OLOG1CAL MATE 8ASCO (I COL
NTER HERE AMD AT LINE 8. FOf
K
IOUC UNIT t>
IHtALtH
•AStOI
a • imc >>
.167
<1.535
<".92l
L
•JCHUCC «*n
itcaooc«t
UM J»
,, < 56, 700
,,-». 13.113
(M IA01)
-------
TABLE 33 (continued).
SAM/1A WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL I
WITH MULTICLONE - SITE A
- CONVENTIONAL LIGNITE BOILER
INS
o
I
CONTMlMnON MlfCT ftt mm NO. 4 FMtt IMZ. tfm. 1 P»|t 2
SOotte/OWlWKWT^. Conventloo.1 Ltgnlte Boiler With Multlclone fffiu£*r STBtA* no 101
A
tM*UFVCTO
UMTS
Er
Ho
Dv
Tb
Cd
Eu
So
Nd
Pr
C*
La
Ba
Ca
I
T«
Sb
-------
TABLE 33 (continued).
SAM/1A WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL
WITH MULTICLONE - SITE A
I - CONVENTIONAL LIGNITE BOILER
CONTMUATK* SMUT fM ITU MO. 4. RttM IMt UWl 1
SOoftCf CC-.-MI OPTION Conventional Ltitnttc Boiler Utth Mult Id one fffLUCNT StftfAM MO l01
A
tMCUrMCTO
UMTS
U>
Br
Sc
As
C*
Ca
Zn
Cu
HI
Co
Fe
Mn
Cr
V
Tl
Ca
K
S
f
Si
A1
Me
Na
B
Be
e
nucto*
OKX»
(•MOB
290
210
83
1.600
7.2
240
880
470
1,400
100
...
27.000
470
470
28,000
...
39.000
60,000
16.000
• • •
...
140,000
10
Lt i 570
c
KMIM
IMII
COHCfM
rauot
2.0E2
2.0
S.6E2
5.0E3
4. 00
2.0E2
1.SE1
5.011
5.0E3
1
5.0E2
6.0C3
N
1.0E2
1.0E4
5.2E3
6.0E3
5.3E4
3.1E3
2.0
2.2E1
0
IOXOCCM
tun
COMCIH
ITUTDM
N
N
N
N
M
N
N
N
M
N
1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
£
MGMf (V
HAIMD
MM.THI
•A3
—
.415
800
.0129
.048
.220
2.35
93.33
2.0
5.4
470
.94
4. $7
160
45.16
5.0
25.91
f
tasnatm
KM IN MtT(
IMU
—
G
OCCMC Of
WUMW
acouacM.)
{•^i
—
470
H
•Dtmoan
ten. MHI
TMU
—
1
v'«
OtTM
KMtl
00X0(0
/
/
,/
y
^,
/
y
,/
y
,/
y
j
V 0
(OX
H4T[
TKflOfO
—
X 1 L
IOK UMT IMCMOCI MU
PCM.TM
MSBM
a Hi* A
11.58
22,320
.360
1 16
6.138
65.57
2604
SS ft
150.7
11 111
26.23
130.3
4,464
1,260
139.5
722.9
ffCOUXOl
•Mm
1C • LM I)
13,113
-------
TABLE 34. SAM/1A WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL I - CONVENTIONAL LIGNITE BOILER WITH ESP -
SITE B
PO
i
INS
SAM/IA WORKSHEET POU LEVEL 1
Form IA02 Uvri 1
1 SOUCC/CONTROl OPTION
Conventional Lignite Boiler With ESP - site B
2 EFFLUENT STREAM
101 Flue G«»
COM* W
PI* I -
j EFFLUEN
C
UM < m
4 COMPLETE THE FOUOWMG TA8LE KM n* EFFLUENT STREAM OF UN£ 2 (USE BACK Of
A
UltflC IMCIOl
UNITS
U
fh
Bl
Pb
Tl
Aii
Ir
Os
Re
W
Hf
Lv
Yb
T»
B
ruciot
cacm
TMICM
< 1.2
< I./
< .5
1.1 - 3.5
< .7
< .9
< 1-4
< 1.5
< .9
< 1.3
< 1.6
< .4
< .5
< .3
C
•4M.IH UAH
MOU
-
T STREAM FLOW RATE
40. 5 • /sec
/MC - I«>M* * L/UC - UM «NHtc » (/tec)
FORM FOR SCRATCH WOftX)
C
OCGIKf 0>
-
H
ma** M
ECOi iMIl
-
1
HlMl-
tull
(•aioco
-
J
V «
tax
lull
IKIUXD
-
K 1 I
TOM UMI ODCHUCI «AH
lE.lM.ll
<.049
<-190
<.053
l£ . lINt 1)
• me tfta a wcufD. usx * COHT««WIKM xur
5 EFFLUENT STREAM DEGREE C
HEALTH MATE BASfD a CLX
fctxoGJCAi. *MTE BASED a
(ENTER HERE AMD Af LIME 8.
If HAZARD
Fl 5* <12.1
cnt o 5* < 1 • 1
f (MM 'MOD
6 NUM8E
COMPAfi
HEALTH 61
ecoLOCicA
» Of ENTRIES
(EO TO MATES
34
1
7 TOTK UNIT Ot5CMARGE SUM
MCAITH UAH BASED a COL K)
ECOLOGICAL UATE BASED (1 COL
(ENFE* HERE AND AT LINE » f&
7, <490.8
Mi IAO!)
-------
TABLE 34 (continued).
SAM/1A WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL I - CONVENTIONAL LIGNITE
BOILER WITH ESP - SITE B
ro
i
oo
u>
COHIBRMTMN SHOT FOt RIM NO. 4. HX» M02. LEW. 1 *•* Z
50uf(C€-C0-'-a5
.008
< .130
tfaaieacM.
Mat
c.iMtn
-------
TABLE 34 (continued). SAM/LA WORKSHEET FOR LEVEL I - CONVENTIONAL LIGNITE
BOILER WITH ESP - SITE B
rs»
i
ro
CONTINUATION SMttT KM !»• *>• *• "•" •*•* «"<«• » ftft 3
IOumXCOt.Tftoi.Of-T.Ot. Conventlon.1 Lignite Boiler With ESP EffLUENI STftfAM ^ lol
A
MMUIMCTOl
UMTS
Rb
Br
Sc
A*
Ge
(U
Zo
Cu
Nl
Co
Fe
Mn
Cr
V
Tl
Ca
K
S
p
SI
Al
MR
B
Be
Li
B
nMCIOH
coo*
flUTOH
< .1-.4
<43
9.7
< 4.2
< .1-.3
< .l-.l
13-31
< 36
<69
< .8
C170
< 7 a
< 4.2
< l.l
< 3.5
40-390
560
1400-7700
< if.
180
36-88
160
680
64
.2
.3
c
•tfM.ni
urn
2.0E2
2.0
5.6E2
^.OE3
4.0E3
2.0E2
1.5E1
5.0E1
S.OE3
1
5.0E2
6.0E3
K
i r>E2
1.0E4
5.2E3
6.0E3
5.3E4
3.1E3
2.0
2.2E1
D
KtneatM
HkR
COMCtH
nuioi
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
1
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
E 1 (
MUMO
(MM.!*
CB/C)
—
.0485
<2.1
C0005
C 00002
<,0078
<.18
<4.6
<.016
C0016
C4.2
C0022
C0006
c.46
.0180
<.0169
.0267
.0128
1. 0206
.1
.0136
MOMM.
COSrtOMI*
WM.lHH*rt
TMU
—
G
MCWU or
HUMO
(tCdOOCAi)
A/01
—
1.1
H
eon. Mkit
TAME
1
UMt
OCHMO
—
y
y/
,/
j
tcxx
IttTl
IICODCO
—
y
,
K
L
MBC »« IMCHMCC UTt
JS.
1.964
-------
TABLE 36. TOTAL CAFB ORGANIC EMISSIONS (vg/m3)
SASS No. 1 SASS No. 2
G! - C6 17,770- No data
23,192
C7 - Ci6 221 307
> Ci6 565 21,725
Total 18,556- > 21,725
23,978
RAC No. 2
4,337-
10,384
650*
7,590*
12,577-
18,624
RAC No. 4
< 6,380
1,430*
19,740*
21,170-
27,550
*
Average RAC 1-5 particulate emissions plus Tenax
captured emissions.
2-125
-------
The following ESCA spectra were contained in the document:
SASS-1 filter participate
SASS-2 filter particulate
SASS-2 IH cyclone particulate
(carbon Is spectrum)
RAC-1 filter particulate
(carbon Is spectrum)
RAC-5 filter particulate
(carbon Is spectrum)
SASS-2 filter particulate
(sulfur 2p spectrum)
SASS-2 filter particulate
(sulfur 2p spectrum, with argon ion etching: after 2 minutes
of etching)
SASS-2 filter particulate
(sulfur 2p spectrum, with argon ion etching: after 18 minutes
of etching)
SASS-2, gasifier bed sample
(carbon Is spectrum)
SASS-1 filter particulate
(carbon Is spectrum)
2-126
-------
STUDY NUMBER 3
-------
STUDY NUMBER 3
DATA
SOURCE:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
OF COAL- AND OIL-FIRING IN
A CONTROLLED INDUSTRIAL
BOILER;
Volume I. Executive Summery
Volume II. Comparative Assessment
Volume III. Comprehensive Assessment
end Appendices
DATA
STATUS:
EPA-600/7-78-164a-C, August 1978
AUTHORS:
CONTRACTOR:
C. Leavitt, K. Arledge, W. Hamersma,
R. Maddalone, R. Beimer, G. Richard,
and M. Yamada
TRW, Inc.
One Space Park
Redondo Beach, California 90278
Contract No. 68-02-2613
PROJECT
OFFICER:
Wade H. Ponder
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
3-1
-------
This study was conducted from October 24, 1977, to May 5, 1978, at the
Firestone Tire and Rubber Company's 10-MW dual-fuel industrial process steam
boiler in Pottstown, Pennsylvania. (The boiler is equipped with a pilot FMC,
Inc., flue gas desulfurization [FGD] unit.) The purpose of the study was to
compare and characterize gaseous, solid, and liquid waste-streams from coal
firing and oil firing of this boiler. Both controlled and uncontrolled emis-
sions were sampled and analyzed. Figure 3-1 (from the final report) shows a
flow diagram of the boiler and FGD system.
This effort encompassed the Level 1 and Level 2 protocol. An exception
to the protocol was that Level 2 sampling and analysis were performed prior to
completion of Level 1 on samples where sample deterioration was anticipated.
For coal and oil firing, these areas were sampled: coal and oil, boiler
blowdown water, flyash, flue gas, FGD scrubber cake, boiler and scrubber
makeup water, and scrubber makeup solids. Table 3-1 (from the report) details
the sampling method and analysis method for each sample.
The basic conclusion of the report was that there was not a significant
difference between coal and oil fuels for an industrial boiler when several
pertinent factors were considered; in this study the comparative impacts of
coal and oil were compared for environmental, energy, economic, and societal
effects. Quoting from the report, the major conclusions of the study were:
(1) While the quantity of particulates from oil firing is considerably
less than from coal firing, the particles are generally smaller and more
difficult to remove, and the concentration of particulates in the treated
flue gas from oil firing exceeded that from coal firing. (2) NO and
CO emissions during coal firing were about triple those during oiT firing
(3) Sulfate emissions from the boiler during coal firing were about
triple those during oil firing; however, at the outlet of the control
equipment, sulfate concentrations were essentially identical. (4) Most
trace element emissions (except vanadium, cadmium, lead, cobalt, nickel
and copper) were higher during coal firing. (5) Oil firing produces
cadmium burdens in vegetation approaching levels which are injurious to
man; coal firing may produce molybdenum levels which are injurious to
cattle. (6) The assessment generally supports the national energy P]an
for increased use of coal by projecting that the environmental insult
from controlled coal firing is not significantly different from that from
oil firing.
3-2
-------
EXHA
TOST
1
I MULTIC
K
n
so
LJSTQAS
ACK
EXHAUST \f g
GAS
SCKUI
MAK£|
RIMMK
ID .
LIOS 1
Cifeif
•EH
!• ^
WATER ~lj
LONES l-f^M-
10
^
EXHA
GAST
•&
UVT
O STACK
rAKC
LANDFILL
FLY ASH
STORAGE
ti
1
1
^ STEAM
LtOIHO
I - FUiL
J- »LO«»OOW«
1 - PLVAtl
4- IXHAMTOAI
POO INLtT
6 - f KHAUCT OA1
fOD OUT LIT
6 - SCRUMEft CAKE
7 - MAKf-Uf WATIM
B - XMUMfR FltDSOLIOS
TO MUNICIPAL
SEWAOI
TB6ATMENT
Figure 3-1. Boiler system schematic and sampling locations.
3-3
-------
TABLE 3-1. PARAMETERS SAMPLED FOR COAL AND OIL FIRING
Location Parameter
1 FUEL (coal & 011)
C, H, N, S, ash,
moisture,
heating value
Inorganics
2 COMBINED SLOWDOWN
Alkalinity/acidity
pH
conductivity
hardness
TSS
nitrate
sulfate
sulflte
phosphate
ammonia
nitrogen
organlcs
3 FLYASH
Inorganics
organlcs
Sampling Method
Grab
Composite dipper
Composite grab
4&5 FLUE GAS (Inlet 4 outlet)
CO Continuous, Beckman
CO,
N07N02/NOX
2* 2
SO,
2
S02/S0,
H 30 nCl HF,
plrtfculate sulfate,
total hydrocarbons
Us CH4)
1 D
partlculatt & vapor
participate sizing
6 SCRUBBER CAKE
Inorganics
organlcs
7 BOILER & SCRUBBER
MAKEUP WATER
organlcs
Inorganics
Model 865
Grab (bag)
Grab (bag)
Continuous, TECO
Model 10A
Grab (bag)
Continuous, TECO
Model 41
Goksoyr-Ross
Continuous, Beckman
Ho del 400
Grab (bag)
SASS
Method 5
Anderson Itnpactor
SASS
Composite grab
Top grab
Analysis
Ultimate (lab)
Level II (lab)
On-s1te HACH kit
Level 1 a 2 (lab)
Level 1 & 2 (lab)
Level 1 & 2 (lab)
Direct reading
GC (TCD) on site
GC (TCD) on site
Direct reading
GC (TCD) on site
Direct reading
Level 2 (lab)
Direct reading
GC (FID) on site
Level 1 (lab)
Level 2 (lab)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 1 & 2 (lab)
Level 1 & 2 (lab)
Level 1 (lab)
Not required
SCRUBBER MAKEUP
SOLIDS
Grab
Not required
3-4
-------
LEVEL 1
3-5
-------
TABLE 3-2. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
FUEL OIL. TEST 202-4
(ppm)
u
Th
B1
Pb 2.6*
Tl
Hg 0.09t
Au
Pt
If
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tin
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb 0.03*
Sn
In
Cd <3.5
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
N1
Co
Fe
Mn
2.9*
<0.05
0.23
0.7*
2.0t
3.0
1.40
16.0
<1.25
12.3
0.4*
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
2.2
36.5
5.50
3.5
-0.04
<0.15
<0.05§
*Va!ties were calculated from concentrations at the scrubber inlet when ICPOES
analysis provided upper Unit data only.
tPerformed by cold-vapor analysis on a feed oil sample from test 203.
tArsenic concentration calculated froa concentration at the scrubber inlet.
§Performed by SSMS on a feed oil sample from test 203.
NOTE: These values are approximate values as determined by spark source
mass spectrometry (SSMS). The missing values were determined by inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICPOES) analysis and are
reported in the "additional data" section.
3-6
-------
TABLE 3-3. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
FEED COAL, TEST 201-1
(ppm)
u
Th
B1
Pb 85
Tl
Hg 0.14*
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tn
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb 85
Sn
In
Cd 3.5
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
293
270
68
73
137
56
72
37
127
12,250
12
Cr 48
V 47
Ti
Sc
Ca 770
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al 14,000
Mg 350
Na
F
B 2.4t
Be 2.3t
Li
-,. .
*Performed by cold-vapor analysis on a fuel coal sample from test 200.
tPerformed by SSMS on a feed coal sample from test 200.
NOTE- These values are approximate values as determined by spark source
iass'specfrometry (SSMS). The missing values were determned by inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICPOES) analyses and are
reported in the "additional data" section.
3-7
-------
TABLE 3-4. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
WASTEWATER INORGANICS, COAL FIRING
(M9/L)
u
Th
Bi
Pb 10
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
NO
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb <1
Sn
In
Cd <1
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Ho
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr 500
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu 20
Ni 5
Co 100
Fe
Mn
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
2
3
800
<1
NOTE: These values are approximate values as determined by spark source
mass spectrometry (SSMS). The missing values were determined by inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICPOES) analysis and are
reported in the "additional data" section.
3-8
-------
TABLE 3-5. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
WASTEWATER INORGANICS, OIL FIRING
(ug/L)
u
Th
Bi
Pb 6
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
TIB
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
ND
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb 1
Sn
In
Cd <1
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr 300
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu 20
Ni 20
Co 7
Fe
Mn
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
20
2
4,000
<1
--.-_- — —
NOTE- These values are approximate values as determined by spark source
•ass'spectrometry (SSMS). The missing values were determined by inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICPOES) analysis and are
reported in the "additional data" section.
3-9
-------
TABLE 3-6. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SCRUBBER CAKE FROM OIL FIRING (DRY BASIS), TEST 202-4
(M9/9)
u
Th
B1
Pb 6*
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sin
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb 3*
Sn
In
Cd 1*
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
Cr
V
14* Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
9* Si
15* Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
19* Li
*SSMS analyses were utilized where ICPOES analysis provided upper limit data
only.
NOTE: These values are approximate values as determined by spark source
mass spectrometry (SSMS). The missing values were determined by inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICPOES) analysis and are
reported in the "additional data" section.
3-10
-------
TABLE 3-7. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SCRUBBER INLET COAL FIRING, TEST 201-1
(mg/m3)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B 0.2
Be 0.1
Li
NOTE: These values are approximate values as determined by spark source
mass spectrometry (SSMS). The missing values were determined by Inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICPOES) analysis and are
reported in the "additional data" section.
3-11
-------
TABLE 3-8. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SCRUBBER OUTLET COAL FIRING, TEST 201-1
(mg/m3)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
$r
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
LI
0.03
0.002
NOTE: These values are approximate values as determined by spark source
mass spectrometry (SSMS). The missing values were determined by inductivel
coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICPOES) analysis and are ^
reported in the "additional data" section.
3-12
-------
TABLE 3-9. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SCRUBBER OUTLET COAL FIRING, TEST 202-4
(mg/m3)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be 0.001
Li
NOTE: These values are approximate values as determined by spark source
mass spectrometry (SSMS). The missing values were determined by inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICPOES) analysis and are
reported In the "additional data" section.
3-13
-------
TABLE 3-10. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SCRUBBER INLET COAL FIRING, TEST 202-4
(mg/m3)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
-------
TABLE 3-11. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
COAL TEST 201-1 SAMPLE B
u
Th
B1
Pb 95
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb 90
Sn
In
Cd 4
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
348
215
64
77
133
64
46
51
152
13,750
11
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
47
44
720
12,100
300
NR
NR
NR = None reported.
NOTE: These values are approximate values as determined by spark source
mass spectrometry (SSMS). The missing values were determined by inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICPOES) analysis and are
reported in the "additional data" section.
3-15
-------
TABLE 3-12. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
COAL TEST 201-1 SAMPLE A
(pg/g)
u
Th
Bi
Pb 77
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb 80
Sn
In
Cd 3
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
238
325
72
68
140
48
98
23
102
10,750
13
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
49
49
820
15,900
400
NR
NR
NR = None reported.
NOTE: These values are approximate values as determined by spark source
mass spectrometry (SSMS). The missing values were determined by inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICPOES) analysis and are
reported in the "additional data" section.
3-16
-------
TABLE 3-13. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
FUEL OIL, TEST 202-4
(ppm)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
1
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Mb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be <0.05*
Li
*Performed by SSMS on a feed oil sample from test 203.
NOTE: These values are approximate values as determined by spark source
mass spectrometry (SSMS). The missing values were determined by inductively
coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICPOES) analysis and are
reported in the "additional data" section.
3-17
-------
TABLE 3-14. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
COAL FIRING, TEST 201-1
(mg/m3)
Sample As Hg Sb
Scrubber inlet 0.011
Scrubber outlet 0.005
TABLE 3-15. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
OIL FIRING, TEST 202-4
(mg/m3)
Sample As
Scrubber inlet
Scrubber outlet
Hg Sb
0.0016
0.0002
TABLE 3-16. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
FUEL OIL
(ppm)
Sample As Hg Sb
202-4 0.09*
*Performed by cold vapor analysis on a feed oil sample from
test 203.
3-18
-------
TABLE 3-17. SULFUR GAS EMISSIONS FROM COAL FIRING
(mg/m3)
202-1 inlet
202-1 outlet
202-4 inlet
202-4 outlet
S02
2582
88.5
2689.2
59.2
S03
20.6
14.6
25.8
18.6
so;
70.4
28.0
TABLE 3-18.
SULFUR GAS EMISSIONS FROM COAL FIRING
(pg/m3)
201-1 Inlet
201-1 Outlet
201-4 Inlet
201-4 Outlet
S02
2,970,000
90,000
2,420,000
130,000
S03
16,900
11,700
12,600
9,000
so;
154,100
19,100
TABLE 3-19. ANION ANALYSIS
COAL FIRING TEST 201-1
(pg/m3)
1 1 U
Sample
Inlet*
Outlet*
F~
510
<76
Cl"
10,900
<9
NOa S04
<1,100
<580
*Mass as the ion.
3-19
-------
TABLE 3-20. NITROGEN OXIDE GASES SCRUBBER INLET
(ppm)
Test no.
200
201-1
201-2
201-3
201-4
TABLE 3-21. NITROGEN
Test no.
200
201-1
201-2
201-3
201-4
Average NO
as N02 *
515
591
539
395
547
OXIDE GASES SCRUBBER OUTLET
(ppm)
Average NO
as N02
456
551
424
309
564
3-20
-------
TABLE 3-22. ANION ANALYSIS
INLET AND OUTLET OF FGD, HN03 EXTRACT
(mg/m3)
Site
201-1 Inlet
201-1-0 Inlet
202-4 Inlet
202-4 Outlet
NR - None reported.
INLET
Site
201-1 Inlet
201-1-0 Inlet
202-4 Inlet
202-4 Outlet
F"
0.012
<0.006
0.009
<0.002
cr
9.262
<0.004
<0.006
<0.006
TABLE 3-23. ANION ANALYSIS
AND OUTLET OF FGD, HOT WATER
(mg/m3)
F"
0.503
<0.070
0.045
0.006
Cl"
1.605
<0.005
0.463
0.223
N03 S04
NR 117.4
NR 0.5
NR 30.7
NR 3.5
EXTRACT
N03 S04
<1.14 36.7
<0.585 18.6
0.235 39.7
0.102 24.5
TABLE 3-24. ANION ANALYSIS
OIL FIRING, TEST 202-4
(mg/m3)
Sample
Inlet*
Outlet* 0.
F"
0.054
006-0.008
Cl"
0.46-0.47
0.22-0.23
N03 S04
0.24
0.102
"Mass as the ion.
3-21
-------
TABLE 3-25. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
COAL FIRING, TEST 200
Parameter
PH
Hard (CaC03)
Alk (CaC03)
Cyanide
Assigned
concentration
7.9
210 mg/L
115 mg/L
0 mg/L
TABLE 3-26. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
COAL FIRING, TEST 201-1
Parameter
PH
Hard (CaC03)
Alk (CaC03)
Cyanide
Assigned
concentration
7.5
158 mg/L
125 mg/L
0 mg/L
TABLE 3-27. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS
COAL FIRING, TEST 201-2
Parameter
PH
Hard (CaC03)
Alk (CaC03)
Cyanide
Assigned
concentration
8.2
135 mg/L
130 mg/L
0 mg/L
TABLE 3-28. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS
COAL FIRING, TEST 201-3
Parameter
PH
Hard (CaC03)
Alk (CaC03)
Cyanide
Assigned
concentration
8.0
145 mg/L
125 mg/L
0 mg/L
3-22
-------
TABLE 3-29. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
COAL FIRING, TEST 201-4
Parameter
pH
Hard (CaC03)
Alk (CaC03)
Cyanide
Assigned
concentration
7.3
100 mg/L
145 mg/L
0 mg/L
TABLE 3-30. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
OIL FIRING, TEST 202-1
Parameter
PH
Hard (CaC03)
Alk (CaC03)
Cyanide
Assigned
concentration
7.5
105 mg/L
135 mg/L
0 mg/L
TABLE 3-31. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
OIL FIRING, TEST 202-2
Parameter
pH
Hard (CaC03)
Alk (CaC03)
Cyanide
Assigned
concentration
6.5
140 mg/L
65 mg/L
0 mg/L
TABLE 3-32. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
OIL FIRING, TEST 202-3
Parameter
PH
Hard (CaC03)
Alk (CaC03)
Cyanide
Assigned
concentration
7.5
155 mg/L
120 mg/L
0 mg/L
3-23
-------
TABLE 3-33. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
OIL FIRING, TEST 202-4
Parameter
PH
Hard (CaC03)
Alk (CaC03)
Cyanide
Assigned
concentration
6.5
150 mg/L
50 mg/L
0 mg/L
TABLE 3-34. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS
OIL FIRING, TEST 203
Parameter
PH
Hard (CaC03)
Alk (CaCOa)
Cyanide
Assigned
concentration
6.9
110 mg/L
140 mg/L
0 mg/L
3-24
-------
TABLE 3-35. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
COAL-FIRING WASTEWATER
Gas
GC7
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
Volatile No. of
weight, ppm peaks
ND
NO
ND
0.1
ND
ND
ND
0.1
0.1
ND
ND = Not detectable.
TABLE 3-36. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
OIL-FIRING WASTEWATER
Gas
GC7
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
Volatile
weight, ppm
ND
ND
ND
<0.1
ND
ND
ND
<0.1
<0.1
ND
No. of
peaks
ND = Not detectable.
3-25
-------
Note that the following photographs were reproduced in the report, but
that such photos were not duplicated for the data compilation.
SEM-EDX of partially fused fly ash from 201-1-Fly Ash
SEM-EDX of iron oxide particle from 201-1-Fly Ash
SEM photo of a cenosphere from 201-1-1 Cyclone
SEM photo of CaS03. \ H20 laths impacted on fly ash cenosphere
SEM photo of typical aggregates found in 201-Scrubber Cake
1000X SEM photo of spherelites found in 204-4-Scrubber Cake
600X SEM photo of "ball of twine" in 202-4-Scrubber Cake
Note that the following TGA SCAN graphs were available in the report
but were not copied for this data compilation.
201-1-I-Filter 201-1-Scrubber Cake
201-1-I-Cyclone 202-4 Filter Cake
202-4-I-Cyclone
Note that the following PLM photographs were available in the report,
but were not copied for this data compilation.
201-1-0 201-1-I-Cyclone
202-4-0 202-4-I-Cyclone
201-1-Scrubber Cake 202-4-Scrubber Cake
201-1-Fly Ash 201-Fly Ash
201-1-I-Filter 202-4-1
3-26
-------
Note that the following FTIR SPECTRA were available in the report, but were
not copied for this data compilation.
TRW-201-l-I-Cyclone - Min. Oil FCR. 09744
TRW-201-l-Filter Corrected for Mineral Oil Triple Subtraction Results
201-1-0 (Minus Blank) Minus
201-1-1 (Minus Mineral Oil)
TRW 201-1-Fly Ash-Corrected for Min. Oil
TRW 201-1-Scrubber Cake Corrected for Min. Oil
TRW 202-4-I-Cyclone - Min. Oil FCR. 05225
TRW Sample Fly Ash Blank - Corrected for Min. Oil
TRW-202-4-Scrubber Cake-Min. Oil FCR. 04177
Triple Subtraction Results
202-4-0 Filter (Minus Blank)
Minus 202-4-1 (Minus Blank)
Subtraction Results
202-4-0 Filter Minus Filter Blank
Subtraction Results
202-4-1 Filter Minus Filter Blank
Subtraction Results
202-1-0 Filter Minus Filter Blank
3-27
-------
Note that the following ESCA SPECTRA were available in the report, but
were not copied for this data compilation.
201-1-1 Cyclone 201-1-Scrubber Cake
201-1-1 Filter 202-4-1 Cyclone
201-1-1 FP 75 A SP 202-4-1 Filter
201-1-0-Filter 202-4-1 Filter 76 A SP
201-1-0 76 A SP 202-4-1 Filter
201-1-0 160 A SP 202-4-0 Filter
201-1-0 300 A SP 202-4-0 76 A SP
201-1-0 500 A SP 202-4-0 76 A SP
201-1-0 760 A SP 202-4-Scrubber Cake
201-1-Fly Ash
Note that the following SIM DATA DEPTH PROFILE PLOTS were available
in the report, but were not copied for this data compilation.
201-1-1 Cyclone 202-4-I-Paper 5
201-1-1 Loose Filter 202-4-0 Filter
201-1-0-PF 201-1-1 FC
202-4-I-Cyclone 202-4 Scrubber Cake
3-28
-------
TABLE 3-37
LC Analysis Results
Total SMipla1
TabantorLC2
ROMVarid3
TCO
mf
QRAV
m|
TCO t QRAV
Total mg
Conctntration
mg/ (m3. L, or k|)6
1.52
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
•• tam
TCO in mg
Found In
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
racttd
Total4
ORAVinmi
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rected
Total4
TCO*
6RAV
Tottl mj
Conctntritlon
mo/
(m3,L. or kj»5
0.12
--
0.03
0.11
0.35
0.85
,0.06
1.52
1. Quantity in antin ampto. dattrmlntd before LC
1 Portton of who* ampto und for LC, Mtu»1 mg
J, Q«awUty nwnni from LC column, actual nt|
4.
-------
LEVEL 2
3-30
-------
U3
ro
en
"
CO
to
o
I
Z
O
ro
•
o
ro
TJ
r*
3*
•o
3
-»i
ro
o»
«<*
jjj-
o
o
c
rt
ro
r*
o
o
— •
-o
fit
-J
rt-
Ji
O
fa
r*
ro
1
-1
1 —
CC
ui 5-
o
8
^
Z
2 4-
<
to
Q
UI
§ 3-
5
o
^^
fr-
OC
1 M
r~ 2™
LU
O
8
•
Z
1 1-
111
\\
\\
•\\
\\
\\
\\
\\
" \\
\\
\\
\\
- \
)
SULFUR
<•
LU
OCARBON
O SULFUR
VANADIUM
A CHLORINE
IRON
CALCIUM
100
200
300
700
DEPTH, A
-------
TABLE 1. ORGANIC ANALYSIS RESULTS
oo
i
u>
ro
COMPOUND NAME
Proplonaldehyde
Nitr (Methane
Ethyl -n-b«tyl ether
Ethyl acetate
Hydrocarbon {CgM^)
Chloropropanol
FRACTION
GB
G8
GB
GB
GB
PR
4-meUiyl-3-pentene-2-onfc* PR
Unidentified alcohol
Octanol
Ketone (Hi 138)*
Ketone (fW 140)
Phthalic anhydride
A»yl benzoate
Glycerol triacetate
Methyl sub aromatic
PR
PR
PR
PR
PR
PR
PF
XR
-> — — -—~, — • • —
ug/ J .
on ;
201-2
IN
170
-
2000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.9
-
-
-
1.7
OUT
380
-
1500
-
-
-
-
4.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
201-3
IN
•
54
-
910
-
380
-
-
-
-
-
6.9
-
-
-
-
OUT
_
-
1500
-
-
3.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Coal I
202-2
IN
200
-
1700
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
-
-
OUT
-
-
-
-
-
-
570
-
-
-
-
-
1.6
-
**
202-3
IN
142
63
1000
-
-
-
350
-
45
20
-
29
-
42
™
OUT
-
"
-
2300
-
-
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
GB = Grab bag samples
PR • Probe rinse
-------
TABLE 9. SURFACE ATOM PERCENT FROM ESCA DATA
Sample*
201-1-1 Cyclone
201-1-1 Filter
0
201-1-1 Filter 76 A SP
201-1-0 Filter
0
201-1-0 75 A SP
0
201-1-0 150 A SP
0
201-1-0 300 A SP
0
201-1-0 500 A SP
0
201-1-0 750 A SP
201-1 Flyash
201-1 Scrubber Cake
202-4-1 Cyclone
202-4-1 Filter
o
202-4-1 Filter 76 A SP
202-4-0 Filter
202-4-0 Filter 76 A SP
202-4-SC
Filter Blank
0
Filter Blank 75 A SP
0
57
56
54.2
45.7
48
48.3
48.3
47.9
47
44.6
47
38.5
48.6
46.3
46.6
53.5
41
38.4
47.3
Na
4
2.4
2.1
5.5
7.4
9.1
8.8
7.3
7.3
2.6
10.0
3.2
4.2
4.7
5.8
3.2
9.8
5.8
8
S
11
11.5
4.0
13.2
11.5
10.0
8.0
6.7
6.1
7.6
14.8
12.9
10.7
6.5
9.9
6.8
15.3
7.5
2
Si
6
14.1
17.9
7.1
9.0
10.1
10.6
10.8
11.6
13.9
3.2
2.6
11.8
17.1
14.9
22.0
2.1
24.7
28.5
Al
7
8
12.6
2.2
5.2
7.7
9.6
13
11.0
7.5
3.7
2.3
3.1
3.3
3.5
4.0
2.3
1.8
3.2
Fe
2
1.4
2.1
1.2
1.2
2.1
1.7
2.3
1.2
0.6
0.8
1.3
1.7
1.1
Cl
2
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.2
0.9
1.2
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.4
2.4
1.3
2.1
1.6
0.9
P
1
1.2
2.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.5
1.2
0.9
0.6
1.5
1.1
1.7
1.0
1.1
1.1
2.6
V
1.0
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.4
1.2
1.7
3.3
1.8
2.0
1.4
0.9
0.6
Ca
2
2.7
1.3
1.1
'
1.2
1.0
5.8
0.9
6.5
1.2
C
14.9
12.1
10.0
8.0
8.1
8.8
18.1
9.9
37.4
17.2
12.9
14.5
6.2
12.7
17.2
4.4
K
7.1
1.8
1.2
1.8
1.1
1.6
1.6
2.6
1.7
3.6
1.3
u>
I
Ck»
0 0
*A SP refers to Depth of Ar+ sputtering in A.
-------
TABLE 5-4. CONCENTRATION OF MAJOR TRACE ELEMENTS IN COAL-TEST 201-1
Element
Ca
Mg
Sb
As
B
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
Mo
Ni
V
Zn
Se
Sr
Al
Zr
Be
Hg.
yg/g Coal
Sample A
820
400
80
140
3
49
102
98
10,750
77
13
238
23
49
48
68
72
15,900
325
-
-
Sample B
720
300
90
133
4
47
152
46
13,750
95
11
348
51
44
64
77
64
12,100
215
-
-
Average
770
350
85
137
*
2.4
3.5
48
127
72
12,250
85
12
293
37
47
56
73
68
14,000
270
2.3*
0.14*
Typical Ranget
0
0
0.2
0.5
4
0.1
4
0.5
3
0.3
4
6
0.4
2
2
6
0.4
NO
0.4
8
0.6
0.07
- 1600
- 959
- 8.9
- 93
- 115
- 65
- 144
- 43
- 61
- 40,000
- 218
- 181
- 30
- 80
- 147
- 5,350
- 74
DATA
- 40,700
- 133
- 4.1
- 0.49
Reference
2,4
2,4
2
1,2
1,3
2
1,3
1,2
1,2
2,4
1,2
2
1,2
1,2
1,2,3
2
2,3
2,4
2
1
1
Boron and beryllium analysis were performed by SSMS on a feed coal
sample from test 200.
t
Typical range for Appalachian and Eastern Interior Basin coals.
Mercury was determined by cold vapor analysis of a coal sample
from test 200.
3-34
-------
TABLE 5-20. DEPTH PROFILE ANALYSIS OF COAL PARTICIPATE WITH CONCENTRATIONS
EXPRESSED AS NORMALIZED ATOM PERCENT* - TEST 201-1
CO
en
Inlet Level II cyclone catch
Level II filter catch
Level II filter catch;
Outlet Level II filter catch
Level II filter catch;
Level II filter catch;
Level II filter catch;
Level II filter catch;
Level II filter catch;
0
76 A
0
75 A
o
150 A
o
300 A
o
500 A
o
700 A
0
57
56
54.2
45.7
48
48.3
48.3
47.9
47
Na
4
2.4
2.1
5.5
7.4
9.1
8.8
7.3
7.3
S
11
11.5
4.0
13.2
11.5
10.0
8.0
6.7
6.1
Si
6
14.1
17.9
7.1
9.0
10.1
10.6
10.8
11.6
Al
7
8
12.6
2.2
5.2
7.7
9.6
13
11.0
Fe
2
1.4
2.1
1.2
1.2
2.1
1.7
2.3
Cl
2
1.5
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.2
1.0
1.2
0.9
P
1
1.2
2.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
1.5
V Ca
2
1.0 2.7
0.7 1.3
1.1
0.5
1.2
0.5 1.0
C
14.9
12.1
10.0
8.0
8.1
8.8
K
7.1
1.8
1.2
1.8
1.1
1.6
The atom percent of the 12 elements presented here adds up to 100 percent. Other elements present in
the cyclone and filter catches were not studied in ESCA. Hence, the atom percents in this table are
normalized atom percents and not absolute atom percents.
-------
TABLE 4-14. EMISSION CONCENTRATIONS OF TRACE ELEMENTS
DURING COAL FIRING - TEST 201-1
Trace
Element
*
Be
Hgf
Ca
Mg
Sb
As
B*
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
Mo
N1
V
Zn
Se
Sr
Al
Zr
Total
Scrubber
Inlet
mg/m
0.1
0.011
74
19
3.7
7.8
0.2
0.47
2.6
3.6
9.6
450
8.5
0.78
10
1.4
3.1
2.3
3.2
11
480
1.6
1100
Scrubber
Outlet
mg/m
0.002
0.005
0.036
0.011
0.025
0.22
0.03
0.0010
0.13
0.012
0.020
2.4
0.021
0.015
0.027
0.063
0.058
0.048
0,099
0.058
2.6
0.018
6.2
MATE
Value
mg/m
0.002
0.05
16
6.0
0.050
0.002
3.1
0.010
0.001
0.050
0.20
1.0
0.15
5.0
5.0
0.015
0.50
4.0
0.200
3.1
5.2
5.0
Degree
Scrubber
Inlet
50
0.22
4.6
3.2
74
3900
0.07
47
2600
72
48
450
57
0.16
2.0
93
6.2
0.58
16
3.5
92
0.32
of Hazard*
Scrubber
Outlet
1.0
0.10
0.002
0,002
0.5
110
0.01
0.1
130
0.24
0.10
2.4
o.u
0.003
0.005
4.2
0.12
0.012
0,50
0.019
0,5
0.004
Approximate values as determined by Spark Source Mass Spectrometry (SSMS)
The other values presented are determined by Inductively Coupled Plasma
Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICPOES) analysis.
Mercury was determined by cold vapor analysis of SASS train.
*Degree of hazard 1s defined as the ratio of the discharge concentration
to the MATE value.
3-36
-------
TABLE 4-15.
EMISSION CONCENTRATIONS OF TRACE ELEMENTS
DURING OIL FIRING - TEST 202-4
Element
Be*
Hgf
Ca
Mg
Sb
As
B
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
Mo
N1
V
Zn
Se
Sr
Al
Zr
Total
Scrubber
Inlet
mg/m
<0,001
0.0016
0.41
0.31
0.062
0.15
0.53
0.28
0.17
0.10
0.54
4.8
0.20
0.03
0.22
1.1
2.7
0.61
0.050
0.043
5.7
0.015
18
Scrubber
Outlet
mg/m
0.001
0.0002
0.070
0.030
0.006
0.030
0.039
0.066
0.018
0.012
0.007
0.28
0.013
0.004
0.025
0.20
0.82
0.065
0.006
0.001
0.48
0.001
2.5
MATE
Value
mg/m
0.002
0.05
16
6.0
0.050
0.002
3.1
0.010
0.001
0.050
0.20
1.0
0.15
5.0
5.0
0.015
0.50
4.0
0.200
3.1
5.2
5.0
Degree
Scrubber
Inlet
<0.50
0.032
0.026
0.052
1,24
75.0
0.171
28.0
170
2.0
2.70
4.8
1.333
0.006
0.044
73.3
5.40
0.153
0.25
0.014
1.096
0.003
of Hazard
Scrubber
Outlet
0.50
0.004
0.004
0.005
0.120
15.0
0.013
6.60
18.0
0.24
0.035
0.28
0.087
0.001
0.005
13.33
1.640
0.016
0.03
0.0003
0.092
0.0002
Beryllium was determined by Spark Source Mass Spectrometry (SSMS). The
other values, with the exception of mercury, are determined by Inductively
Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICPOES) analysis.
fMercury was determined by cold vapor analysis of SASS train samples taken
during test 203.
3-37
-------
TABLE 4-16. EMISSION FACTORS AND MASS EMISSION RATES OF
TRACE ELEMENTS DURING COAL FIRING - TEST 201-1
Trace
Element
Be*
Hgf
Ca
Mg
Sb
As
B*
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
Mo
N1
V
Zn
Se
Sr
Al
Zr
Total
Emission Factor, ng/J
Scrubber
Inlet
0.04
0.08
32
8.2
1.6
3.4
0.1
0.20
1.1
1.6
4.1
190
3.7
0.34
4.3
0.60
1.3
0.99
1.4
4.7
210
0.69
470
Scrubber
Outlet
0.001
0.037
0.015
0.0046
0.010
0.092
0.01
0.00042
0.054
0.0050
0.0084
1.0
0.0088
0.0063
0.026
0.026
0.024
0.020
0.041
0.024
1.1
0.0075
2.6
Emission Rate,
-------
TABLE 4-17. EMISSION FACTORS AND MASS EMISSION RATES OF
TRACE ELEMENTS DURING OIL-FIRING - TEST 202-4
Element
*
Be
Hgf
Ca
Mg
Sb
As
B
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
Mo
N1
V
Zn
Se
Sr
A1
Zr
Total
Emission Factor.
ng/J
Scrubber
Inlet
<0.0003
0.0006
0.13
0.10
0.02
0.049
0.17
0.091
0.055
0.033
0.18
.1.6
0.065
0.010
0.072
0.36
0.88
0.20
0.016
0.014
1.9
0.0049
6.0
Scrubber
Outlet
0.0003
0.0001
0.022
0.0094
0.0019
0.0094
0.012
0.021
0.0057
0.0038
0.002
0.088
0.0041
0.0013
0.0079
0.063
0.26
0.02
0.002
0.0003
0.15
0.0003
0.78
Emission
gm/hr
Scrubber
Inlet
<0.04
0.05
16
12
2.5
5.9
21
11
6.7
3.9
21
190
7.9
1.2
8.7
43
no
24
2.0
1.7
220
0.59
710
Rate,
Scrubber
Outlet
0.04
0.006
2.7
1.1
0.23
1.1
1.5
2.5
0.69
0.46
0.27
11
0.50
0.15
0.95
7.7
31
2.5
0.23
0.038
18
0.038
96
Removal
Efficiency
Unknown
87
83
91
91
81
93
77
90
89
99
95
94
87
89
83
71
90
87
98
92
94
87
Enrichment
Factor
>n.9
1.48
2.03
1.15
1.15
2.37
0.87
2.80
1.26
1.43
0.15
0.69
0.77
1.58
1.35
2.16
3.61
1.27
1.43
0.28
1.0
0.79
Beryllium was determined by SSMS. The other elements, except fluorine,
were determined by ICPOES.
fMercury was determined by cold vapor analysis of SASS train samples taken
during test 203.
3-39
-------
TABLE 4-33.
INORGANIC CONTENT OF SCRUBBER CAKE FROM
COAL-FIRING (DRY BASIS) - TEST 201-1
Element
Ca
Mg
Sb
As
B
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
Mo
N1
V
Zn
Se
Sr
Al
Zr
Concentration
vg/g
60,715
1.458
315
532
88
13
141
424
112
47,241
297
51
1,117
114
195
282
256
642
45,310
106
MATE
Health
460
180
15
0.5
93
0.1
0.5
1.5
10
3.0
0.5
0.5
150
0.45
5.0
50
0.10
92
160
15
Value, pq/g
Ecology
32
174
0.4
0.1
50
0.002
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.2
14
0.02
0.3
0.2
0.05
—
2.0
m •*
Degree
Health
126
8.1
21
1,064
0.9
130
282
283
11
15,738
594
102
7.4
253
39
5.6
2,560
7.0
283
7.1
,.,
of Hazard
Ecology
1,897
8,4
788
5.320
1.8
6,500
282
848
1,120
94,482
2,970
255
80
5,700
650
1,410
5,120
w
22,655
•» •
Total
159,409
3-40
-------
TABLE 4-34. INORGANIC CONTENT OF SCRUBBER CAKE
FROM OIL FIRING (DRY BASIS) - TEST 202-4
Element
Ca
Mg
Sb
As
B
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
Mo
N1
V
Zn
Se
Sr
Al
Zr
Total
Concentration
vg/g
200,000
3,799
3
15*
40
*
1
15
19*
16
2,164
*
6
6
14
132
203
36
*
9
239
1,684
37
208,450
MATE Val
Health
480
180
15
0.5
93
0.1
0.5
1.5
10
3.0
0.5
0.5
150
0.45
5.0
50
0,10
92
160
15
ue, yg/g
Ecology
32
174
0.4
0.1
50
0.002
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.2
14
0.02
0.3
0.2
0.05
--
2.0
•-
Degree of
Health
417
21
0.2
30
0.4
10
30
13
2
721
12
32
0.1
293
41
0.7
90
2.6
11
2.5
Hazard
Ecology
6,250
22
7.5
150
0.8
500
30
38
160
4,328
60
80
. 1
6,600
677
180
180
--
842
.-
SSMS analyses were utilized where ICPOES analysis provided upper limit
data only.
3-41
-------
TABLE 4-35. INORGANIC CONTENT OF FLY ASH FROM
COAL-FIRING - TEST 201-1
• !•••! HI "'"
Element
Ca
Mg
Sb
As
B
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
Mo
N1
V
Zn
Se
Sr
Al
Zr
Concentration
ug/g
378
2,478
438
1,015
20
18
434
408
320
129,330
438
121
1 ,288
165
376
179
378
728
109,450
187
MATE
Health
480
180
15
0.5
93
0.1
0.5
1.5
10
3.0
0.5
0.5
150
0.45
5.0
5.0
0.10
92
160
15
Value, wg/g
Ecology
32
174
0.4
0.1
50
0.002
0.5
0.5
0.1
0.5
0.1
0.2
14
0.02
0.3
0.2
0.05
—
2.0
--
Degree
Health
0.8
14
29
2,030
0.2
180
868
272
32
43,110
876
242
9
367
75
36
3,780
8
684
12
.
of Hazard
Ecology
12
14
1,095
10,150
0,4
9,000
868
816
3,200
258,660
4,380
605
92
8,250
1.253
895
7,560
— _.
54,725
^
Total 248,149
3-42
-------
TABLE 4-36. MASS BALANCE ON TRACE ELEMENTS - TEST 201-1
Element
Ca
Mg
Sb
As
B
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
Mo
N1
V
Zn
Se
Sr
Al
Zr
Coal Feed
g/hr
2,794
1,270
308
497
8.7
12.7
174
46.1
261
44,455
308
44
1,063
134
171
203
265
247
50,806
980
Scrubber
Cake
g/hr
40,072
962
208
351
58
8.6
93
280
74
31,179
196
34
737
75
151
186
169
424
29,905
70
Scrubber
Effluent Gas
g/hr
1.6
0.5
1.1
9.7
1.2
0.04
5.7
0.53
0.88
no
0.92
0.68
1.2
2.8
2.5
2.1
4.3
2.5
no
0.79
Bottom and
Fly Ash*
g/hr
30
198
35
81
1.6
1.4
35
33
26
10,346
35
9.7
103
13
30
14
30
58
8,756
15
Percent.
Recovery
*
91
79
89
700
79
77
68
39
94
75
100
79
68
107
100
77
196
76
9
For mass balance calculations, bottom ash has been assumed to have the
same trace element concentrations as fly ash. This 1s an approximate
assumption, as some trace elements are enriched 1n the fly'ash.
f Percent recovery 1s defined as the ratio of the sum of the emissions for
a trace element to the trace element 1n the coal feed.
Percent recovery for calcium 1s not calculated because most of the
calcium 1n the scrubber cake Is from the 11me slurry.
3-43
-------
TABLE 4-37. MASS BALANCE OF TRACE ELEMENTS - TEST 202-4
Element
Ca
Mg
Sb
As
3
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
Mo
N1
V
Zn
Se
Sr
Al
Zr
011 Feed
g/mln
16.4
(12.2)f
( 2.4)
( 5.9)
(20.9)
(n.o)
3.6
( 3.9)
4.2
36.7
( 7.9)
( 1.2)
( 8.7)
47.7
108.8
8.9
( 2.0)
0.7
10.4
( 0.6)
Scrubber
Cake
g/m1n
50,000
950
*
0.8
*
3.9
10.0
*
0.2
3.9
*
4.7
4.1
541
*
1.5
4.0
*
3.5
33.0
50.7
9.1
*
2.4
59.8
421
9.2
Scrubber
Outlet
g/mln
2.8
1.2
0.2
1.2
1.5
2.6
0.7
0.5
0.3
n.o
0.5
0.2
1.0
7.9
32.3
2.7
0.2
0.04
18.9
0.04
Percent*
Recovery
**
>1,000
42
68
55
25
125
133
105
> 1,000
25
350
52
91
76
133
136
>1,000
>1,000
> 1 ,000
SSMS data were utilized where ICPOES analysis provided upper limit
data only.
f ICPOES data from the analysis of scrubber Inlet partlculates were
utilized when fuel analysis provided upper limit data only.
* Percent recovery of a trace element 1s 100 times the ratio of Us total
emission rate (scrubber cake plus scrubber outlet) to Its feed rate.
Percent recovery for calcium 1s not calculated because most of the
calcium 1n the scrubber cake 1s from the lime slurry.
3-44
-------
TABLE 5-13. COMPOSITION OF FGD SCRUBBER CAKE
Element
Ca
Mg
Sb
As
B
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
Mo
Ni
V
Zn
Se
Sr
Al
Zr
Concentration, n
Coal Firing 01
60715
1458
315
532
857
13
141
424
112
47241
297
51
1117
114
195
282
256
642
45310
106
9/9
1 Firing
192030
1776
122
135
2405
7
33
231
35
3867
104
15
666
148
161
19
128
163
4625
39
Relative
Concentrations,
Coal /Oil
.3
.8
2.6
3.9
.4
1.9
4.3
1.8
3.2
12.2
2.9
3.4
1.7
.8
1.2
14.9
2.0
3.9
9.8
2.7
3-45
-------
z
o
h-
ZI c
(O
c:
(D
•o a
0) ft>
I -0
rt- c*
-b 3-
O
C TJ
— • I
D> O
UJ
o
Z
O
O
5- -
D CARBON
OSULFUR
O VANADIUM
A CHLORINE
• IRON
CALCIUM
rt>
O>
ro in
o — •
—• o
' -h
O
C
r*
ID
O
O
0>
oo
O
UJ
O
O
z
UJ
o
z
z
UJ
z
UJ
_/
UJ
100
200
OE.PTW. /K.
-------
TABLE 4-38. ANNUAL EMISSIONS
TABLE 4-38. ANNUAL EMISSIONS
co
i
Pollutant
Gaseous 110^ (as W^)
so2
so4
CO
Organic; (as CH.)
Cl ' V
C7 ' C16
Total Particulates
<1n
\ - 3w
3 - lOy
>10*
Scrubber Inlet
Coal Firing
500.810
1.127.300
6.184
67.214
16.119
5,870
<5.606
345
2.311
2.991.700
--
--
—
—
Oil Firing
164.230
906,202
7.249
20.894
4.991
2.272
<4.164
155
2.381
53.832
—
—
—
—
kg/year
Coal /Oil Coal Firing
3.05
1.24
0.85
3.22
3.23
2.58
2.2Z
0.97
55.6
—
—
—
—
442.520
36.800
4.157
8.110
14.497
6,377
<5.606
274
335
18.856
11.691
5.657
1.320
188
Scrubber Outlet
Oil Firing
157.390
24,453
5.183
8.303
4.845
2,500
<4,164
18
392
13.686
11,359
1.642
634
0*
CoaTTbil
2.81
1.51
0.80
0.98
2.99
2.55
15.2
0.85
1.38
1.03
3.45
1.93
--
•Vyear
Liquid BloMdnm/Waste Water
Cooling Hater
i76.000
186.000
176.000
186.000
i 1
i 1
i76.000
186.000
176.000
186.000
i 1
i 1
kg/year
Solid Botto* Ash
Fly Ash
Scrubber Cake
i 778.600
il, 800 .000
0
i 7.600
ilS.OOO
0
H03
il20
"
i 778,600
il.BOO. 000
8.054.100
i 7.600
ilS.OOO
3,011.000
il03
1120
2.67
Assuming 1001 load. 45 weeks per year (7.560 hrs/year).
These values represent the detection li»it of the Instrument used.
*These values represent oil firing participate with a minimum of coal ash contamination.
-------
COAL. INLET
COAL. OUTLET
—-..— OIL. INUT
OIL. OUTLET
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY
STANDARD: ANNUAL
ARITHMETIC MEAN
• I
DISTANCE MOM STACK, km
10
Figure 4-2. Comparison of NOx Air Quality Resulting From Coal
and Oil Firing Under Worst Case Weather Conditions
(Tests 201-1 and 202-1)
3-48
-------
180- -
COAL. INLET
- — COAL. OUTLET
— OIL. INLET
OIL, OUTLET
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY
STANDARD: ANNUAL
ARITHMETIC MEAN
0 8 10
DISTANCE FROM STACK, km
Figure 4-3.
Comparison of NOX A1r Quality Resulting From Coal
and 011 Firing Under Typical Weather Conditions
(Tests 201-1 and 202-1)
3-49
-------
TNI MOCT HfOTMCTlVE CO
STANOAAO IS 10 mg/m3
(S-HOUR AVERAQC)
COAL. INLET
- — COAL, OUTLET
OIL INLET
OIL. OUTLET
DlftTANCf FROM STACK, km
Figure 4-4.
Comparison of CO A1r Quality Resulting From Coal and
Oil Firing Under Worst Case Weather Conditions
(Tests 201-1 and 202-1)
3-50
-------
e« -
5- -
a 4« -
1
oe
ui
8
ui
1- •
THE MOOT RESTRICTIVE CO
STAND AMD 18 10
(frHOUR AVERAGE)
COAL, INLET
- — COAL. OUTLET
— — OIL, INLET
OIL. OUTLET
I I I
0 a 10
DISTANCE FROM STACK, km
I
12
14
Figure 4-5. Comparison of CO Air Quality Resulting From Coal
and 011 Firing Under Typical Weather Conditions
(Tests 201-1 and 202-1)
3-51
-------
tno
1800- -
1400 • •
n
1JOO - -
I
1000 • -
•00- -
eoo- •
400 • -
20O- •
GOAL. INLET
••— COAL, OUTLET
— OIL, INLET
OIL OUTLET
SECONDARY STANDARD:
MAXIMUM VHOUB AVERAGE
STANDARD:
MAXIMUM 24-HOUR AVERAGE
PRIMARY STANDARD
ANNUAL ARITHMETIC
e • to
DISTANCE FROM STACK, km
Figure 4-6.
Comparison of SC>2 A1r Quality Resulting from Coal and
011 Firing under Worst Case Weather Conditions
(Tests 201-1 and 202-1)
3-52
-------
400- •
COAL, INLET
COAL. OUTLET
OIL, INLET
OIL, OUTLET
SECONDARY STANDARD:
MAXIMUM 24-HOUR AVERAGE
300- »
PRIMARY STANDARD:
ANNUAL GEOMETRIC MEAN
a •
DISTANCE PROM STACK, km
Figure 4-7. Comparison of SOg A1r Quality Resulting From Coal
and 011 Firing Under Typical Weather Conditions
(Tests 201-1 and 202-1)
3-53
-------
> COAL. INLET
.. — COAL. OUTLET
....OIL. INLET
OIL. OUTLET
3000- -
I 2000-
1000* •
ALL PRIMARY AND SECONDARY
STANDARDS ARE IN THE RANGE
a s
DISTANCE MOM STACK, km
10
ta
,4
Figure 4-8.
Comparison of Participate Air Quality Resulting from Coal
and Oil Firing under Worst Case Weather Conditions
(Tests 201-1 and 202-1)
3-54
-------
1000- >
000* »
COAL. INLET
__-.-. COAL. OUTLET
INLET
OIL. OUTLET
PRIMARY STANDARD:
MAXIMUM 24-HOUR AVERAGE
SECONDARY STANDARD:
MAXIMUM 24-HOUR AVERAGE
SECONDARY STANDARD:
ANNUAL GEOMETRIC MEAN
SECONDARY STANDARD:
ANNUAL GEOMETRIC MEAN
B
100- •
Figure 4-9.
DISTANCE FROM STACK, km
Comparison of Participate Air Quality Resulting From
Coal and 011 Firing Under Typical Weather Conditions
(Tests 201-1 and 202-1)
3-55
-------
TABLE 4-3. SUMMARY OF ULTIMATE FUEL ANALYSES (5 TEST AVERAGES)
Component
Moisture
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Chlorine
Sul fur
Ash
Oxygen
kJ/kg
Coal
Weight %
7.15
72.10
4.28
0.92
0.12
1.64
9.90
3.89
29,485
t
o
0.86
1.07
0.06
0.07
0.02
0.23
0.85
0.23
459
011
Weight %
~o
86.28
'10.92
0.36
N.A.X
1.96
0.02
0.46
40, 741 f
" » — .
at
-
0.39
0.03
0.06
-
0.08
0.004
0.40
-
t = one standard deviation.
a
XN A = not analyzed.
*The heat content of the oil burned is nearly constant at this value;
Individual values were not available.
3-56
-------
TABLE 4-7. SUMMARY OF CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS - COAL FIRING
CO
I
en
Test No.
200 Inlet
200 Outlet
201-1 Inlet
201-1 Outlet
201-2 Inlet
201-2 Outlet
201-3 Inlet
201-3 Outlet
201-4 Inlet
201-4 Outlet
Average Inlet
V *
Average Outlet
(as N02)
417
(0.97)
367
(0.85)
491
0.14)
457
(1.06)
455
(1.06)
358
(8.33)
330
(0.77)
258
(0.60)
409
(0.95)
420
(0.98)
421
(0.98)
372
(0.87)
CO
20.7
(0.05)
18.5
(0.04)
16.5
(0.04)
15.7
(0.04)
17.7
(0.04)
15.9
(0.04)
16.2
(0.04)
12.7
(0.03)
8.56
(0.02)
8.95
(0.02)
15.9
(0.04)
14.3
(0.03)
so2
1009
(2.35)
25.4
(0.06)
1284
(2.99)
39.0
(0.09)
1295
(3.01)
35.5
(0.08)
1028
(2.39)
31.8
(0.07)
942
(2.19)
49.7
(0.12)
1112
(2.59)
36.3
(0.08)
ng/J (Ib/MM Btu)
HC
(as CH4)
3.79
(0.01)
4.22
(0.01)
4.35
(0.01)
5.22
(0.01)
0.88
(0.00)
1.33
(0.00)
10.9
(0.03)
10.9
(0,03)
8.95
(0.02)
9.73
(0.02)
5.79
(0.01)
6.29
(0.01)
C, - Lc
1 0
Organlcs
<5.49
-------
TABLE 4-8. SUMMARY OF CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS - OIL FIRING
Test No.
202-1 Inlet
202-1 Outlet
202-2 Inlet
202-2 Outlet
202-3 Inlet
202-3 Outlet
OJ
i, 202-4 Inlet
w *
03
202-4 Outlet
203 Inlet*
203 Outlet*
Average
Inlet
Average
Outlet
"Ox
175
(0.41)
166
(0.39)
175
(0.41)
165
(0.38)
181
(0.42)
177
(0.41)
141
(0.33)
138
(0.32)
— —
— ^
168
(0.39)
161
(0.37)
CO
5.08
(0.01)
4.70
(0.01)
5.30
(0.01)
5.03
(0.01)
6.22
(0.01)
5.92
(0.01)
5.30
(0.01)
5.60
(0.01)
_•»
__
5.47
(0.01)
5.31
(0.01)
so2
938
(2.18)
32.1
(0.07)
1075
(2.50)
29.2
(0.07)
1085
(2.52)
26.7
(0.06)
874
(2.03)
19.2
(0.04)
_.
__
993
(2-31)
26.8
(0.06)
ng/J
HC*
(as CH4)
2.84
(0.01)
3.20
(0.01)
4.61
(0.01)
5.01
(0.01)
1.71
(0.00)
1.98
(0.01)
0.82
(0.00)
0.76
(0.00)
__
__
2.49
(0.01)
2.74
(0.01)
(Ib/HH Btu)
C1-C6
Organlcs
<4.63
(< 0.01)
<4.63
(< 0.01)
<4.79
(< 0.01)
<4.79
(< 0.01)
<4.73
(< 0.01)
<4.73
(< 0.01)
<4.14
(< 0.01)
<4.14
{< 0.01)
__
._
<4.57
(< 0.01)
<4.57
(< 0.01)
C7 - C16
Organlcs
__
w.
__
..
_.
._
_.
0.17
(0.00)
0.02
(0.00)
0.17
(0,00)
0.02
(0.00)
Organlcs
Higher
Than C]6
w—
._
._
..
..
..
._
2.61
(0.01)
0.43
(0.00)
2.61
(0.01)
0.43
(0.00)
Total
Partlculates
166
(0.39)
20.2
(0.05)
__
_.
--
..
59.0
(0.14)
15.0
(0.03)
--
..
113
(0.26)
17.6
(0.04)
*&ifssJon factors were computed assuming an QZ concentratfon of 5.5X, the average concentration for test 202.
Total hydrocarbons as uefermined by F/0.
-------
TABLE 4-10. SCRUBBER INLET AND OUTLET
PARTICULATE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Aerodynamic
Diameter Size
Range, Microns
< 1
1 - 3
3 - 10
> 10
Coal Firing
Scrubber
Inlet
0.0017
0.041
2.24
97.7
Weight %
(Test 201-1) 011 F1r1nq (Test 202-1)
Scrubber Scrubber
Outlet Inlet
62 20
30 1
7 74
1 5
Scrubber
Outlet
83
12
5
0
TABLE 4-11. EMISSION RATES OF PARTICULATES
Aerodynamic
Diameter
Size Range,
Microns
< 1
1 - 3
3 - 10
> 10
Total
Coal F1r1nq (Test
kg/hr
Scrubber Scrubber
Inlet Outlet
0.0055 1.30
0.13 0.63
7.3 0.15
316.5 0.021
324.0 2.10
201-1) 011 F1r1nq (Test
Removal kq/hr
Efficiency Scrubber Scrubber
Inlet Outlet
<0 4.48 2.27
<0 0.22 0.33
97.9 16.6 0.14
>99.9 1.12 0.00
99.3 22.4 2.74
202-1)
Removal
Efficiency
49.2
<0
97.4
100
87.8
3-59
-------
TABLE 4-13. SUMMARY OF SULFATE EMISSIONS
DURING COAL AND OIL FIRING
Emission Rate, ng/J
Coal - Test 201-1 Oil - Test 202-4
Scrubber Scrubber Scrubber Scrubber
Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet
Water Soluble 16.0 (24%) 8.1 (97%) 12.9 (56%) 8.0 (88%)
Acid Soluble 51.2 (76%) 0.2 ( 3%) 10.0 (44%) 3.5 (12%)
Total 67.2 8.3 22.9 9.1
3-60
-------
TABLE 4-18.
DEPTH PROFILE ANALYSIS OF COAL PARTICIPATE WITH CONCENTRATIONS
EXPRESSED AS NORMALIZED ATOM PERCENT* - TEST 201-1
A1 Ft C1
Ct
Inltt
Outlit
livtl II cyclone cttch
Itvtl II fllttr catch
Itvtl II fdttr catch; 76 A
livtl II fllttr cttch
Itvtl II fllttr ctteh; 75 A^
livtl It Mlttr Citchi ISO A
Itvtl II fllttr citcM 300 A
Livil II fllttr cttch; SOO A
Ltvtl II fllttr Cttch i 700 A
57
56
54.2
4S.7
48
48.3
48.3
47.)
47
4
2.4
2.1
5.5
7.4
9.1
8.8
7.J
11
.".5
4.0
13.2
11.5
10.0
8.0
6.7
6
14.1
17.9
7.1
9.0
10.1
10.6
10.8
7
a
12.6
2.2
5.2
7.7
9.8
13
2 i
1.4
2.1
1.2
1.2
2.1
1.7
5
.5
.3
.2
.1
.2
.0
.2
1
1.2
2.2
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
2
1.0 2.7
0.7 1.3
1.1
0.5
1.2
14.9
12.1
10.0
8.0
8.1
7.1
1.8
1.2
1.8
1.1
Tht ttM ptrctnt of tht 12 tltmtnti prtttnttd htr« tddt up to 100 ptrctnt. Othtr tl«Mtnti prtstnt In
tht cyclent ind fllttr cttchtt wtrt not ttudltd In ISCA. Hone*, tht ttM ptrctnti
-------
TABLE 4-20. MAJOR PARTICULATE COMPONENTS
DETERMINED BY PLM ANALYSIS*
Component
Ashf
Fused
Unfused
Minerals
Fe203
Fe304 (Magnetite)
S102
CaC03
011 Soot
Coke
CaS03-l/2 H20 and
Unknown Sulfate
Scrubber
Coal
15-30
50-65
1-5
10-15
< 2
10-20
< 2
—
Approximate
Inlet
on
13-23
1-4
< 1
< 1
5 3
43-57
—
20-39
Weight %
Scrubber
Coal
__-
...
15-25
1-5
25-40
50-65
Outlet
on
—
— — —
8-16
2-8
« « «
80-90
*
Coal-fired samples were taken from test 201-1. 01l-f1red samples were
taken from test 202-4.
This 1s primarily composed of Iron-aluminum silicates.
3-62
-------
TABLE 4-25. COMPARISON OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IDENTIFIED BY GC/MS
IN THE FLUE GAS DURING COAL AND OIL FIRING
co
i
0»
CO
Compound
Proplonaldehyde
Nltromethane
Ethyl -n-butyl ether
Ethyl acetate
Hydrocarbon (C^-H,.,)
0 1 H
Chloropropanol
4-methyl -3-pentene-2-one
Unidentified alcohol
Octanol
Ketone (MH 138)
Ketone (MW 140)
Phthallc anhydride
Amyl benzoate
Glycerol triacetate •
Methyl substituted
aromatic
Emission Rate, ng/J
Coal Fired 011 Fired
201-2 201-3 202-2 202-3
Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet Inlet
0.075 0.17 0.024 ~ 0.075 — 0.052
0.023
0.88 0.66 0.400 0.66 0.64 — 0.37
—
0.17
0.0017
0.21 0.13
0.0018
0.017
0.0074
0.0017 -- 0.003 -- 0.0053
0.011
0.0006
0.016
0.00075
Outlet
—
—
0.85
—
—
0.01
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
«.«•
-------
ADDITIONAL DATA
3-64
-------
TABLE 2. PARAMETERS SAMPLED FOR COAL AND OIL FIRING
Location
1
2
3
4&5
6
7
Parameter
FUEL (coal & oil)
C, H, N, S, ash,
moisture,
heating value
Inorganics
COMBINED SLOWDOWN
Alkalinity/acidity
PH
conductivity
hardness
TSS
nitrite
lUlfate
•ulflte
phosphite
•rnnonla
nitrogen
organlcs
FLYASH
Inorganics
organlcs
Sampling Method
Grab
Composite dipper
Composite grab
Analysis
Ultimate (lab)
Level II (lab)
On-slte HACK kit
Level 1 ft 2 (lab)
Level 1 & 2 (lab)
Level 1 A 2 (lab)
FLUE GAS (Inlet & outlet)
CO
xo2
N07NO-/NO,,
NM C X
oiv«
tm £
soz
soj/so,
H2fo.,HCl, HP.
pirtTculatt lulfitt.
total hydrocarbons
(•• CHJ
C, - C? organlcs
4 0
partlculate & vapor
paniculate sizing
SCRUBBER CAKE
Inorganics
organlcs
BOILER & SCRUBBER
MAKEUP WATER
organlcs
Inorganics
Continuous. Beckman
Model 865
Grab (bag)
Grab (bag)
Continuous, TECO
Model 10A
Grab (bag)
Continuous, TECO
Model 41
Goksoyr-Ross
Continuous, Beckman
Model 400
Grab (bag)
SASS
Method 5
Anderson Impactor
SASS
Composite grab
Top grab
Direct reading
GC (TCO) on site
GC (TCD) on site
Direct reading
GC (TCD) on site
Direct reading
Level 2 (lab)
Direct reading
GC (FID) on site
Level 1 (lab)
Level 2 (lab)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 1 & 2 (lab)
Level 1 & 2 (lab)
Level 1 (lab)
Not required
e
SCRUBBER MAKEUP
SOLIDS
Grab
Not required
3-65
-------
TABLE 3. ANNUAL EMISSIONS
Pollutant
Gaseous NOx (as NOg)
SOj
S03
so/
CO
Organ Ics (as CH4)
cl * C6*
C; • Cie
Cu#
ToUl PirtiCMlates
| Qij
kg/year
Scrvbber Inlet
Coal Firing
500,810
1.127.300
6.184
67.214
16.119
5.870
. 86.000
t. 7,600
x 15,000
0
% 1
•v 1
•v 103
% 120
-v 76,000
86,000
% 771,600
%! .000,000
8.0S4.100
•t?6,000
186.000
•%. 7.600
•vlS. 000
3,011.000
•«. 1
•V 1
•403
••.120
2.67
Assuring 10OT load, 45 weeks per /ear (7.SCO Irs/.year}.
t
Thtst valves represent the detection Ifelt of Ue Instrwent used.
*These nines represent oil firing parttetilate vitli • m\*\mm of coal ash contantiutton.
-------
TABLE 4-12. S02> S03» and S04= EMISSIONS FROM COAL AND OIL FIRING
CO
011
llutan
S09
2
SO,
3
t
Test
201-1
201-4
201-1
201-4
Scrubber
Inlet
ng/J
*
1280
937
7.2
4.9
Scrubber
Outlet
ng/J
37.8
47.8
4.9
3.3
% of Fuel
Sulfur Found
in Flue Gas
at Inlet
92
94
0.4
0.4
Removal
Effi-
ciency
97
95
33
32
Test
202-1
202-4
202-1
202-4
Scrubber
Inlet
ng/J
940
874
7.5
8.4
Oil
Scrubber
Outlet
ng/J
32.2
19.2
5.3
6.0
% of Fuel
Sulfur Found
in Flue Gas
at Inlet
92
90
0.6
0.7
Removal
Effi-
ciency
97
98
29
28
so,
201-1 66.3
8.0
202-4 22.9
9.1
1.6
60
Total 201-1
95
202-4
92
-------
TABLE 4-24. SUMMARY OF THE INFRARED ANALYSIS OF ORGANICS
FROM OIL AND COAL COMBUSTION
OJ
1
CTi
CO
ToUl Or»»1cs.
-8/-3
uujory
Alipluttc MjrdracartoM
AraMttc Hjr<*oc«rt«M
CklwlMtctf itHntirfem
SIltCMttS
feUracjrtllc Salfta-
Tklourto*?! Ti-fu.-"-
lltro tmynmtt
CtWri
fitcn
talics
AlcttKoH
SlycoH
Cartoullc *c1*j
$«lf«lc Ac1«s
Stlluus
LCI U2 ICJ LC4 Iti LU LC7 T»ul
toil Oil llu* CM! til tluk Cul Oil ll»k CM! Oil tlmk CM! Oil ItMk toil Oil Hut Cat! 011 BUrik U*l Oil Hint
8.14 O.M 8.0Z 0.0* O.Oi 8.03 8.12 0.03 0.01 8.37 8.04 t.K 8.M 9.» 8.18 0.06 0.02 1.70 8.51 8.11
'"«""'
m at at w w m to to i* to IM
to to to XHnmBlto tototo to to
Oi
la to to to to
to to to to to
to
IN to OH 0* OB 0*
IN
to mm m m n m m m m m to
to OB (M ta
to to
n n ut n
to ON
to « M m SM m n
IX
«M
dot AMljmd. 0 - At lc«it e*t iptclo imixctod prcsrut. M • lUJar rminim.
1 - At lust ant iptclts pfntnt. • - Mln
-------
TABLE 1. INPUT DATA USED IN PLUME HEIGHT CALCULATIONS
Stack Temperature (°C)
Ambient Temperature (°C)
Stack Velocity (m/s)
Stack Area (m2)
Stack Height (m)
Wind Speed (m/s)
Coal
51.7
20.0
16.44
0.245
10.0
4.0
Oil
55.6
20.0
16.44
0.245
10.0
4.0
3-69
-------
TABLE 2. PROCESS SAMPLES ANALYZED BY GC/MS
CO
I
SAMPLE NUMBER
201-2-1-S-KD
201-3-1-S-KD
202-2-1-S-KD
202-3-1-S-KD
202-2-1-S
202-3-1-S
201-2-1-B-S-KD
201-3-1-B-S-KD
202-2-1-B-S-KD
202-3-1-B-S-KD
20J-2-IB-3-S-KD
201-2-1-B-S
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
Coal-fired, Test #2, concentrated field extraction of 4 liters
of scrubber water.
Coal-fired, Test #3, concentrated field extraction of 4 liters
of scrubber water.
Oil-fired, Test #2, concentrated field extraction of 4 liters
of scrubber water.
Oil-fired, Test #3, concentrated field extraction of 4 liters
of scrubber water.
Oil-fired, Test #2, unconcentrated field extraction of 4 liters
of scrubber water.
Oil-fired, Test #3, unconcentrated field extraction of 4 liters
of scrubber water.
Coal-fired, Test #2, concentrated lab base/neutral extraction
of 2 liters of field extracted scrubber water.
Coal-fired,.Test S3, concentrated lab base/neutral extraction
of 2 liters of field extracted scrubber water.
Oil-fired, Test #2, concentrated lab base/neutral extraction
of 2 liters of field extracted scrubber water.
Oil-f*red, Test #3, concentrated lab base/neutral extraction
of 2 liters of field extracted scrubber water.
Coal-fired, Test #2, concentrated lab base/neutral extraction blank.
Coal-fired, Test #2, unconcentrated lab base/neutral extraction
of 4 liters of field extracted scrubber water.
Coal -f i r-€»rj . Tuit tf"l . uncrmciintra ted A ab base/neutral extraction
-------
TABLE 2. (Continued)
OJ
I
202-2-1-B-S
202-3-1-B-S
201-2-1B-B-S
201-2-1-A-S-KD
201-3-1-A-S-KD
202-2-1-A-S-KD
202-3-1-A-S-KD
201-2-1-1B-A-S-KD
201-2-1-A-S
201-3-1-A-S
202-2-1-A-S
202-3-1-A-S
201-2-1B-A-S
201-2-SC-S-KD
201-3-SC-S-KD
202-2-SC-S-KD
Z02-3-SC-5-KD
011-fired, Test 12, unconcentrated lab base/neutral extraction
of 2 liters of field extracted scrubber water.
Oil-fired, Test 13, unconcentrated lab base/neutral extraction
of 2 liters of field extracted scrubber water.
Coal-fired, Test #2, unconcentrated lab base/neutral extraction blank.
Coal-fired, Test #2, concentrated lab acid extraction of 2 liters
of field extracted scrubber water.
Coal-fired, Test #3, concentrated lab acid extraction of 2 liters
of field extracted scrubber water.
Oil-fired, Test #2, concentrated lab acid extraction of 2 liters
of field extracted scrubber water.
Oil-fired, Test 03, concentrated lab acid extraction of 2 liters
of field extracted scrubber water.
Coal-fired, Test #2, concentrated lab acid extraction blank.
Coal-fired, Test #2, unconcentrated lab acid extraction of 2 liters
of field extracted scrubber water.
Coal-fired, Test #3, unconcentrated lab acid extraction of 2 liters
of field extracted scrubber water.
Oil-fired, Test #2, unconcentrated lab acid extraction of 2 liters
of field extracted scrubber water.
Coal-fired, Test *2, unconcentrated lab acid extraction of 2 liters
of field extracted scrubber water.
Coal-fired, Test #2, unconcentrated lab acid extraction blank.
Coal-fired, Test #2, concentrated lab extraction of scrubber cake.
Coal-fired, Test #3, concentrated lab extraction of scrubber cake.
Oil-fired, Test #2, concentrated lab extraction of scrubber cake.
Oil-fired, Test #3, concentrated lab extraction of scrubber cake.
-------
TABLE 2. (Continued)
201-3-FA-S-XD Coal-fired, Test #3, concentrated lab extraction of fly ash.
201-2-SCB-S-KD Coal-fired, Test #2, concentrated lab extraction blank.
2Q1-2-SC-S Coal-fired, Test #2, jnconcentrated lab extraction of scrubber cake.
201-3-SC-S Coal-fired, Test 13, unconcentrated lab extraction of scrubber cake.
202-2-SC-S Oil-fired, Test #2, unconcentrated lab extraction of scrubber cake.
20?-3-SC-S Oil-fired, Test #3, unconcentrated lab extraction of scrubber cake.
201-3-FA-S Coal-fired, Test #3, unconcentrated lab extraction of fly ash.
201-2-SCB-S Coal-fired, Test.#2, unconcentrated lab extraction blank.
-vl
ro
-------
TABLE 3. OVERALL SIZE DISTRIBUTION
Size Ranges
<3.2um
3.2-6.4
6.4-12.8
12.8-19.2
19.2-32.0
32.0-48.0
48.0-64.0
64.0-96.0
96.0-128
>128um
Arithmetic Mean
Diameter
Size Ranges
<1 .Oym
1.0-2.0
2.0-3.0
3.0-4.0
4.0-6.0
6.0-8.0
8.0-10.0
10.0-14.0
14.0-20.0
>20.0pm
Arithmetic Mean
Diameter
201-1-
Flyash
20.8%
21.3%
19.9%
17.6%
12.0%
5.1%
2.3%
0.5%
0.5%
0.0
13.4MIT1
201-1-1-
Filter
19.6%
22.5%
16.7%
10.5%
12.0%
8,6%
4.3%
2.9%
1.0%
0.0
3.32um
201-1-1-
Cyclone
39.6%
26.9%
17.0%
9.9%
5.2%
0.9%
0.5%
0.0
0.0
0.0
6 . 63um
201-1-
Scrubber Cake
33.0%
20.9%
13.1%
10.2%
10.7%
5.3%
2.4%
2.4%
1.5%
0.5%
2.99ym
202-4-1-
Cyclone
21.2%
28.1%
26.6%
11.3%
8.9%
2.5%
0.5%
1.0%
0.0
0.0
10.4ym
202-4-
Scrubber Cake
37.7%
29.1%
11.2%
9.9%
7.2%
2.2%
0.4%
1.3%
2.2%
0.9%
2.78um
3-73
-------
TABLE 4. PLH ANALYSES RESULTS
u»
-&
COAL FIRED &ORE3 SAXPtfS
CocpofientG
A
I
Partially fused flyash
Flyash
Oil soot
f-lagnetite
Iron oxide
Coke
Quart*
Calcite
u 503-1/2^0
Unknown sulfate
OIL FlkEO BOILER S£H?'.ES
1-5*
5-151
10-20%
2-5*
l-5i
1
1-Flyash j 201-1-1-Cyclone
8
30
4
C
5-140
1-20
25 i 2-100
i
12 ! 3-45
I
15
40
1-40
A
55-72
10-20i
10-201
10-2CS
1-51
5-160 1 <2X
t |
12
5-60
<2%
i
i
I
i
B
25
4
15
12
7
60
20
C
5-65
1-16
2-80
3-25
<1-50
6-100
5-40
201-1-I-Filter
A
40-55S
35- SOS
10-255
<2S
<2S
B
12
2
8
5
5
C
5-40
<1-13
1-40
2-14
1-18
__
| 201-1-0-
201-1-Scrubber Cake
A
55-701
10-20X
10-202
1-5S
<2I
-------
TABLE 10. ATOM CONCENTRATION AT A DEPTH OF 1400 A FOR GAS PARTICULATE SAMPLES
El ement
LI
Na
Mg
AT
Si
K
Ca
Ti
V
Cr
Mn
Fe
Sr
Ba
201-1 -I -Cyclone
922 ppm
1.05%
0.92%
18.48%
18.74%
3.23%
1.59%
0.88%
294 ppm
322 ppm
304 ppm
4.82%
752 ppm
232 ppm
201-1-I-Filter
0.10%
1.33%
0.77%
19.28%
17.88%
3.62%
1.91%
0.89%
310 ppm
279 ppm
314 ppm
4.02%
784 ppm
268 ppm
201-1-0-Filter
770 ppm
22.84%
1.34%
9.17%
10.42%
2.55%
2.17%
0.15%
187 ppm
141 ppm
140 ppm
1.21%
119 ppm
42 ppm
202-4- I -Cyclone
0.11%
2.27%
1.06%
11.7%
22.44%
2.75%
2.62%
0.42%
0.97%
760 ppm
251 ppm
5.44%
758 ppm
449 ppm
202-4-I-Filter
291 ppm
9.57%
4.51%
8.1%
12.3%
3.32%
3.75%
0.26%
3.06%
670 ppm
759 ppm
4.87%
445 ppm
516 ppm
202-4-0-Filter*
37 ppm
10.36%
2.44%
5.04%
23.13%
2.68%
3.55%
890 ppm
1.22%
203 ppm
298 ppm
1.42%
99 ppm
42 ppm
CJ
I
Ul
Concentrations at 1200 A depth.
-------
TABLE 13. ELEMENTS SHOWING POSITIVE ENRICHMENT TRENDS
Coal
Sb, As,
B, Cr,
Mn, Ni,
V, Zn,
Se, Zr,
Oil
Ca, Mg,
Sb, As,
Cd, Cr,
Co, Mn,
Mo, Ni ,
V, Zn, Se
TABLE 14. FLUE GAS CONDITIONS ACROSS THE SCRUBBER
Coal
201-1-1
201-1-0
201-4-1
201-4-0
Oil
202-1-1
202-1-0
202-4-T
202-4-0
S02
Concentration,
ppm
1114
33.8
913
48.2
2969
33.2
1009
22.2
Mass
Loading,
mg/m3
7180
48
8660
53
452
55
182
46
Average Gas
Flow Across
the Scrubber,
ds cm/mi n
89.3
152.7
3-76
-------
TABLE 15. TOTAL SULFATE VALUES FROM THE MODIFIED METHOD 5 TRAIN
Sample
201-1 Coal Inlet
Probe
Cyclone (>3w)
Filter
Inlet Total
201-1 Coal Outlet
Probe
Filter
Outlet Total
202-4 Oil Inlet
Probe
Cyclone (>3p)
Filter
Inlet Total
202-4 Oil Outlet
Probe
Filter
Outlet Total
Sulfate Extraction Values (mg/m3)
Hot H20 Extraction
<100
36.7
36.7
_ •.
18.6
18.6
__
10.4
29.3
39.7
..
24.5
24.5
HN03 Extraction
0.2
107.0
10.2
117.4
« —
0.5
~075~
29.0
0.7
1.0
' 30.7
3.5
<0.33
3.5
Total
— .
107.0
46.9
154.1
_ M
19.1
TO"
29.0
11.1
30.3
70,4
3.5
24.5
28.0
3-77
-------
TABLE 16. FTIR BANDS, cm
Coal Filter
Outlet
653 (w, sh)
773 (w)
857 (s)
1038-1160 (s, b)
1235 (m)
1660 (b)
NaHS04 • H20
650 (sh)
775 (m)
865 (s)
1040-1080 (b)
1150-1350 (vb)
Oil Filters
Inlet
863 (s)
1047 (s)
1155 (s)
1645 (b)
Outlet
872 (s)
1040 (s)
1160 (5)
1645 (b)
TABLE 17. H2S04 CONCENTRATION, mg/dscm (ppm)
Run
201-1
201-4
Average 201
202-1
202-4
Average 202
Inlet
20.7* (5.09)*
15.5* (3.80)*
18.1
25.2 (6.19)
31.6 (7.74)
28.4
Outlet
14.3 (3.51)
11.0 (2.69)
12.7
17.9 (4.39)
22.7 (5.58)
20.3
Scrubber Efficiency (%)
31
29
30
29
28
29
^Values corrected (+12%) for loss of H2S04 to fly ash on filter.
3-73
-------
TABLE 3-2. 1976 STEAM GENERATION AND FUEL CONSUMPTION DATA FOR
BOILER NUMBER 4
Month
i
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOGER
NOVEMBER
CECEMSER
Total
steam
generated
by unit
Pounds
63,191.120
56,731,849
59,264,345
65,082,129
54,663.247
24,615,374
64,379,
-------
TABLE 3-4. NUMBER OF DAYS THAT BOILER WAS OFF-LINE FROM 1 JANUARY
TO NOVEMBER 1977
1976
Month
JANUARY
FEBRUARY
MARCH
APRIL
MAY
JUNE
JULY
AUGUST
SEPTEMBER
OCTOBER
NOVEN3ER
DECEMBER
No. of days off-line
1976
—
--
—
—
9
19
1
10
20
—
1
--
iyyy
--
--
3
2
.„
--
23
8
1
._
6
*
Total
63
45
3-30
-------
• PERCENT OF CAPACITY SUPPLIED IV OIL FIRING
+ PERCENT OF CAPACITY SUPPLIED IY COAL FIRING
O TOTAL PERCENT CAPACITY IN RELATION TO DESIGN
C.ENIRATION,*
100-
»0-
S
a "'
o ">•
^
2 60'
ft
«* <0«
f«
! "•
1 ,o.
i 20.
10'
0
• •
•
,
n
1 1
«,
*
m
-
«
_
o
0 t +
+
,
,_,
•30
3
> »
»/» r*
• 20 02
•n •
— S
wi a
10 J*"
12
0
F rl A
XONTHS IN YEAR
•ASSUMING ico, ooo IBS/HP. AS loot STEAM GENERATION
Figure 3-6. Comparison of fuel use and off-line schedule for 1976.
• PERCENT OF CAPACITY SUPPLIED BY OIL FIRING
+ PERCENT OP CAPACITY SUPPLIED IY COAL FlftlNO
^ TOTAL PERCENT CAPACITY IN RELATION TO
DESIGN STEAM GENERATION*
100'
90'
•u
5 JO-
m
* ,„,
S
3 <0'
^ to.
o 40'
X* 1Q<
>
10'
0
o ° 0 0 o o o
1 o +
+ ^ * +
•»•
4.
n n n .
S
*
L
* • B *
J F N A H J J A S
0 0
•»•
*
•
•n
r30
,3
s ;
w ^
^S
'" •-«
•'«. ?i
-< ™^
m
iii
0 N
MONTHS IN YEAR
'ASSUMING 100,000 LBS/H* AS 1001 STEAM CENEAATION
Figure 3-7. Comparison of fuel use and off-line schedule for 1977
3-81
-------
TABLE 5-1. SUMMARY OF TEST CONDITIONS - COAL FIRING
Test
No.
200
201-1
201-2
201-3
201-4
Steam Production Rate
kg
steam/hr
39,700
44,200
43,100
34,000
40,800
Ibs.
steam/hr
87,500
97,500
95,000
75,000
90,000
% of
Maximum
Load
87.5
97.5
95.0
75.0
90.0
Nominal
Coal Peed
Rate,
kg/hr
3629
3629
3629
3175
3629
% 02 at
Scrubber
Inlet*
7.8
8.2
8.4
8.3
6.7
Estimated %
Excess Air
to Furnacet
20
20
20
20
20
Due to air leaks 1n ducting upstream of the scrubber Inlet, tabulated Q?
values are not representative of combustion zone 02 concentrations.
Combustion zone Og concentrations normally range from 3 to 4% for this unit
02 - CO/2
% excess air is estimated to be 100 x Q ^ ^——TQ— co/2T
where: ' 2 " 2
02 was assumed to be 3.5% and other species concentrations are computed
from fuel analyses.
TABLE 5-2. FRACTION OF FLUE GAS PROCESSED BY THE SCRUBBER
DURING COAL COMBUSTION
Test No.
200
201-1
201-2
201-3
201-4
Average
Flow Rate
at Scrubber
Inlet, „,
dscm/m1n
99
91
89
98
102
96
% of Design
Load
56
51
50
55
58
54
Total
Flue Gas
Flow Rate,
dscrn/m1n*
754
761
798
684
706
741
Fraction of
Total Flue Gas
Processed by
the Scrubber
0.13
0.12
o.n
0.14
0.14
0.13
Dry standard cubic meters per minute (dscm/m1n)
3-82
-------
TABLE 5-3. SUMMARY OF ULTIMATE COAL ANALYSES
Test Number
Weight %
Moisture
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Chlorine
Sulfur
Ash
Oxygen
W/kg
200
8
71
4
0
0
1
8
4
29,
.44
.69
.33
.86
.10
.64
.94
.00
263
201-1
7.37
70.62
4.18
1.00
0.10
2.00
11.19
3.54
28,872
201-2
6
73
4
0
0
1
9
4
29,
.54
.30
.31
,88
.12
.38
.41
.06
997
201-3
7
71
4
0
0
1
9
4
29,
.18
.94
.27
.87
.13
.68
.85
.08
419
201-4
6.23
72.97
4.30
0.98
0.15
1.50
10.09
3.78
29,874
Average
7
72
4
0
0
1
9
3
.15
.10
.28
.92
.12
.64
.90
.89
29,485
a*
0.86
1.07
0.06
0.07
0.02
0.23
0.85
0.23
459
c » One standard deviation.
3-83
-------
TABLE 5-9. SUMMARY OF CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS-COAL FIRING
U)
I
CO
Test No.
200 Inlet
200 Outlet
201-1 Inlet
201-1 Outlet
201-2 Inlet
201-2 Outlet
201-3 Inlet
201-3 Outlet
201-4 Inlet
201-4 Outlet
Average Inlet
Average Outlet
ng/J (Ib/MM Btu)
N0x
A
(as N02)
417
(0.97)
367
(0.85)
491
(1.14)
457
(1-06)
455
(1.06)
358
(8.33)
330
(0.77)
258
(0.60)
409
(0.95)
420
(0.98)
421
(0.98)
372
(0.87)
CO
20.7
(0.05)
18.5
(0.04)
16.5
(0.04)
15.7
(0.04)
17.7
(0.04)
15.9
(0.04)
16.2
(0.04)
12.7
CO. 03)
8.56
(0.02)
8.95
(0.02)
15.9
(0.04)
14.3
(0.03)
SO-
L.
1009
(2.35)
25.4
(0.06)
1284
(2.99)
39.0
(0.09)
1295
(3.01)
35.5
(0.08)
1028
(2.39)
31.8
(0.07)
942
(2.19)
49.7
(0.12)
1112
(2.59)
36.3
(0.08)
HC*
(as CHd)
4
3.79
(0.01)
4.22
(0.01)
4.35
(0.01)
5.22
(0.01)
0.88
(0.00)
1.33
(0.00)
10.9
(0.03)
10.9
(0.03)
8.95
(0.02)
9.73
(0.02)
5.79
(0.01)
6.29
(0.01)
Cl ' C6
I \J
Organics
<5.49
(<0.01 )
<5.49
(<0.01)
<5.65
(<0.01 )
<5.65
(<0.01)
<5.75
(<0.01 )
<5.75
(<0.01)
<5.69
(<0.01 )
<5.69
(<0.01)
<5.06
(<0.01 )
<5,"06
(<0.01)
<5.53
(<0.01)
<5.53
(<0.01)
C7 - C16
/ 1 u
Organics
0.34
(0.00)
0.27
(0.00)
0.34
(0.00)
0.27
(0.00)
Organics
Higher
Than
2.28
(0.01)
0.33
(0.00)
2.28
(0.01)
0.33
(0.00)
Total
Participates
2361
(5.49)
14.3
(0.03)
3122
(7.26)
20.9
(0.05)
3370
(7.84)
20.6
(0.05)
2951
(6.86)
18.6
(0.04)
* Total hydrocarbons as determined by flame ionization detection (Fin) analysis.
-------
TABLE 5-10. SUMMARY OF CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS - COAL FIRING
CO
00
in
Test No.
N0x
CO
so2
(as N02)
200 Inlet
200 Outlet
201-1 Inlet
201-1 Outlet
201-2 Inlet
201-2 Outlet
201-3 Inlet
201-3 Outlet
201-4 Inlet
201-4 Outlet
Average Inlet
Average Outlet
45
39
51
46
49
40
30
23
44
46
44
39
2.2
2.2
1.7
1.6
1.9
1.8
1.5
1.1
0.9
0.9
1.6
1.5
106
3.0
134
3.9
139
3.9
97
2.7
100
5.2
115
3.7
HC C, - C, C7 - C,, High
(as CH,) 1 6 7 16 Molecular
Q
0.40
0.56
0.45
0.53
0.09
0.15
0.97
1.01
0.96
1.00
0.58
0.64
Organics Organics Weight
Organics
<0.59 0.04 0.25
<0.59 0.001 0.004
<0.60
<0.60
<0.62
<0.62
<0.53
<0.53
<0.55
<0.55
<0.57 0.04 0.25
<0.57 0.001 0.004
!-" jL""^r" ~
otal
Particulates
248
1.7
324
2.1
—
— —
—
— —
362
2.1
311
2.0
-------
TABLE 5-n. COMPARISON OF CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS
WITH EMISSION FACTORS FOR UNCONTROLLED BOILERS
Pollutant
NOX (as N02 at full load)
CO
SO,
c
Organlcs
Total Partlculates
Test
Before
491
15.9
1112
5.79
2951
nq/J
Data
Scrubber
(1.14)
(0.04)
(2.59)
(0.01)
(6.86)
(Ib/MM Btu)
Average Emissi
for Uncontrol 1
343
19
1189
5.72
3212
on Factors^
ed Sources
(0.80)
(0.04)
(2.77)
(0.01)
(7.47)
Factors are computed from AP-42 values using the national average
bituminous coal higher heating value of 11,263 Btu/lb (Reference 6)
TABLE 5-12. SUMMARY OF N0¥ REDUCTION DATA
A
Test
No.
200
201-1
201-2
201-3
201-4
Average NOX As N0«
ng/J (ppm)
Inlet Outlet
417 367
(515) (456)
491 457
(591) (551)
455 358
(539) (424)
330 258
(395) (309)
409 420
(547) (564)
Average NO Removal by
Integration Method*
ng/J (ppm) %
37 8.9
(46)
28 5.7
(34)
93 20.3
(110)
79 24.0
(95)
Not Significant
-•- — — —
The area between plots of Inlet and outlet NOX concentrations vs time
was Integrated and averaged with respect to time to yield average
removals.
3-86
-------
TABLE 5-13. APPROXIMATE SCRUBBER INLET PARTICIPATE SIZE
DISTRIBUTION FOR COAL FIRING (PLM) -
TEST 201-1
Particle Diameter
Size Range, Microns
Approximate Numerical
1 - 3
3 - 10
6
26
40
28
TABLE 5-14. SCRUBBER INLET AND OUTLET PARTICULATE
SIZE DISTRIBUTION BY WEIGHT FOR COAL
FIRING - TEST 201-1
Aerodynamic Diameter
Size, Range, Microns
<1
1-3
3-10
>10
Weight %
Scrubber
Inlet
0.0017
0.041
2.24
97.7
Scrubber
Outlet
62
30
7
1
3-87
-------
TABLE 5-15. EMISSION RATES OF PARTICULATES FOR A
COAL-FIRED BOILER IN TEMPORAL UNITS -
TEST 201-1
Aerodynamic Diameter
Size Range,
Microns
<1
1-3
3-10
>10
Scrubber
Inlet
0.0055
0.13
7.3
316.5
kg/hr
Scrubber
Outlet
1.30
0.63
0.15
0.021
Removal
Efficiency
<0
<0
97.9
>99,9
Total
324.0
2.10
99.3
TABLE 5-17. SUMMARY OF SULFATE EMISSIONS DURING
COAL FIRING - TEST 201-1
mg/nT
Inlet
Outlet
Water soluble
Acid soluble
Total
36.7 (2450
117.4 (76%)
154.1
18.6 (97%)
0.5 (3 %)
19.1
3-85
-------
TABLE 5-21. MAJOR COAL PARTICIPATE COMPONENTS - TEST 201-1
Component
Ash*
Fused
Unfused
Minerals
Fe2°3
Fe^OA (magnetite)
S10?
CaCOa
011 sootf
Coke
CaSOs.1/2 H20 and
Unknown sulfate
Approximate weight %
Inlet Outlet
15-30
50-65
1-5 15-25
10-15
< 2
1-5
10-20 25-40
< Z
50-65
Iron-aluminum silicates.
See text for discussion.
TABLE 5-24. COMPARISON OF ORGANIC MEASUREMENT METHODS
DURING COAL FIRING - TEST 200
Method
Total as CH4 (FID)
Cl
C7
Cl(
- C6 (GO
- Clfi (GC)
- (Gravimetric)
Organic Concentration
mg/m
Inlet Outlet
9 11
112.7* S12.7*
0.81 0.652
5.4 0.788
% Change
Not
Significant
-
-20
-85
*These values represent the detection limit of the Instrument used.
3-89
-------
TABLE 5-25. SUWARY OF THE INFRARED ANALYSIS OF ORGANICS PRODUCED
DURING COAL COMBUSTION - TEST 200 INLET (NOT CORRECTED FOR BLANK)
Total Organics,
WJ/S
LCI*
Sample/Blank
0.14 0.02
LC2
Sample/Blank
—
LC3
Sample/Blank
0.06 0.03
LC4
Sample/Blank
0.12 0.01
LC5
Sanple/Blank
0.37 0.02
LC6
Staple/Blank
0.95 0.10
LC7
Sample/Blank
0.06
Total
Sa«ple/81ank
1.70 0.18
Category
Intensity*
Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Chlorinated Hydrocarbons
Silicones
Heterocyclic Sulfur
Compounds
Tniocarbonyl Compounds
Nitro Compounds
Ethers
Esthers
Aaides
Alcohols
S^ycols
Phenols
Carboxylic Acids
Silicates
XH XH
XH XM
N/A
XH XM
XX XM
XM
Xra
JOB
Xn
XH
Xm
Xm
Xm
XM
XM
XM
Xm
Xm
X*
XH Xm
Xm
Xm
X* OB
XM XM
OB
XM XM
Xm
Xn
XM
XM XM
I
Xa
XB
OB
XM XM
Om On
Xm
XM
OM
XM XM
•
CO
I
•
LC fractionation was perforated per standard Level 1 analytical procedures.
t 0 = At least one species suspected present
X = At least one species present
M = Material type accounts for 50% of the sample
m = Material type accounts for 10X of the sample
-------
TABLE 5-26. ORGANIC COMPOUNDS IDENTIFIED IN THE
FLUE GAS DURING COAL FIRING*
Compound Name
Proplonaldehyde
Ethyl-n-butyl ether
Hydrocarbon (CcH-jJ
Chloropropanol
Unidentified Alcohol
Ketone (MW 140)
Methyl substituted aromatic
uq/m3
201-2
In Out
1 70 380
2000 1 500
-
-
4.0
3.9
1.7
201-3
In Out
54
910 1500
380
3.9
-
6.9
-
As discussed 1n the text, these compounds are not considered to be
directly asoodated with combustion.
TABLE 5-31. SOLID WASTE PRODUCTION RATES - COAL FIRING
Test
200
201-1
201-2
201-3
201-4
Bottom Ash
kg/hr* ug/J
^80 ^.75
*^80 ^.76
•vflO ^0.73
t80 'vO.Se
^0 M).74
Scrubber
kg/hr
1100
1100
1200
850
840
Caket
ug/J
10.2
10.5
11.0
9.1
7.8
15 tons a week
Scaled up to represent scrubbing of 100% of the flue gas for boiler
number 4,
3-91
-------
TABLE 5-32. SCRUBBER CAKE MASS BALANCE FOR COAL FIRING - TEST 201-1
Component
Fly Ash Removed by Scrubber
CaS03'l/2 H20 Formed from S02
Scrubbing and Na2S03
Regeneration
CaS04, CaC03, Na2S04, Ca(OH)9.
NaHS03 and Na2S03 Losses
(estimated)
Water
Total
Contribution
324
262
10-85
429-504
1100
— — _
to Scrubber Cak
——————
29.5
23.8
0.9-7.7
39-46
inn
-------
TABLE 5-36. ANNUAL EMISSIONS - COAL FIRING*
Pollutant
Gaseous NOX {as NO?)
S02
S03
S04
CO
Organics (as CH4)
Cj - C5 Organics
Cj — CIA Organics
High Molecular Weight Organics
Total Particulates
0 - lu
1 - 3u
3- lOu
>10p
Liquid Slowdown /wastewater
Cooling water
Solid Bottom ash
Fly ash (mechanical separator)*
Scrubber cake t
kg/year
Scrubber Inlet
500,810
1,127,300
6,184
67,214
16,119
5,870
<5,606t
345
2,311
2,991,700
Scrubber Outlet
442,520
36,800
4,157
8,110
14,497
6,377
<5,606t
274
335
18,856
11,691
5,657
1,320
188
M3/year
v76,000
^86,000
^76,000
^86,000
kg/year
-778,600
~1 ,800,000
0
^778,600
<*!, 800,000
8,054,100
%
Di f f erence
-12
-97
-33
-88
-10
+ 9
—
-21
-86
-99
1 ™
—
_
0
0
0
0
—
f
VO
CO
* Assuming 1002 load, 45 weeks/year (7,560 hours/year).
t These values represent the detection limit of the instrument used.
f Assuming that the mechanical separator is operating properly.
-------
TABLE 6-1. SUMMARY OF TEST CONDITIONS - OIL FIRING
Test
No.
202-1
202-2
202-3
202-4
203
Steam Production Rate
kg
Steam/hr
45,400
45,400
44,200
42,200
31,800
Tb
Steam/hr
100,000
100,000
97,500
93,000
70,000
% of
Maximum
Load
100
100
97.5
93.0
70.0
Nominal
Oil Feed
Rate,
Gal/hr
900
900
880
805
600
% 02 at
Scrubber
Inlet
5.8
6.3
6.1
4.0
Not
Measured
Estimated
» Excess
A1r to +
Furnace
21
21
21
21
21
Due to air leaks 1n ducting upstream of the scrubber inlet, tabulated 0?
values are not representative of combustion zone 03 concentrations. Combus-
tion zone 02 concentrations normally range from 3 to 4% for this unit.
, 02 - CO/2
% excess air 1s estimated to be 100 x Qi264 N2 - (0? - CO/2)' where °2 was
assumed to be 3.5* and other species concentrations were computed from fuel
analyses.
TABLE 6-2. FRACTION OF FLUE GAS PROCESSED BY SCRUBBER
DURING OIL COMBUSTION
Test
No.
202-1
202-2
202-3
202-4
203
Average
Flow Rate
at Scrubber
Inlet, *
dscm/m1n
193
192
189
155
171
180
% of
Design
Load
109.0
108.5
107.8
87.6
96.6
101.9
Total Flue
Gas Flow
Rate, *
dscm/min
824
850
818
657
537
737
Fraction
Processed
by the
Scrubber
0.24
0.23
0.23
0.24
0.32
0.25
Dry standard cubic meters per minute (dscm/m1n)
3-34
-------
TABLE 6-3, SUMMARY OF ULTIMATE OIL ANALYSES
Weight %
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Sulfur
Ash
Oxygen
kJ/kg
*
a « One
202-1
85.96
10.95
0.31
2.08
0.02
0.68
-
202-2
85.83
10.88
0.34
1.95
0.02
0.98
M
202-3
86.54
10.95
0,42
1.97
0.02
0.10
M
202-4
86.77
10.92
0.30
1.97
0.01
0.03
«
203
86.29
10.89
0.42
1,85
0.02
0.53
-
Average
86.28
10.92
0.36
1.96
0.02
0.46
40, 741*
*
a
0.39
0.03
0.06
0.08
0.004
0.40
-
standard deviation.
The heat content of the oil burned 1s nearly constant at this value;
Individual values were not available.
3-95
-------
TABLE 6-4. CONCENTRATION OF MAJOR TRACE ELEMENTS IN OIL
(TEST 202-4)
Element
Ca
Mg
Sb
As
B
Cd
Cr
Co
Cu
Fe
Pb
Mn
Mo
Ni
V
Zn
Se
Sr
Al
Zr
Be
Hg
ppm in
Fuel 011
5.50
<0.4
0.03f
2.0*
<0.15
<3.5
2.2
<1.25
1 .40
12.3
2.6f
0.4f
2.9f
16.0
36.5
3.0
0.7f
0.23
3.5
<0.05
**
<0.05
4-4-
0.09ft
Typical Reference
Range*
No Data
No Data
0.002-0.8 1
0.0006-1.1 1
No Data
No Data
0.002-0.02 1
No Data
No Data
0.003-14 1,2
No Data
0.001-6 i
<0. 1-1.5 1
14-68 3
15-590 3
No Data
0.03-1 i
No Data
No Data
No Data
No Data
0.02-30 i
*
Except for V and N1, these ranges are for U.S. and foreign crude oils
Ranges of V and N1 concentrations are for fuel oils.
^Values were calculated from concentrations at the scrubber inlet when
ICPOES analysis provided upper limit data only.
*Arsen1c concentration calculated from concentration at the scrubber
Inlet (see text).
**
Performed by SSMS on a feed oil sample from test 203.
ftPerformed by cold vapor analysis on a feed oil sample from test 203.
3-96
-------
TABLE 6-5. CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS FOR AN OIL-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER IN CONCENTRATION UNITS (5 TEST AVERAGE)
mg/Nm3 (Gra1n/SCF)
Pollutant Before ScrubberAfter Scrubber
NOX (as N02) 467 (0.20) 450 (0.20)
CO 15.3 (0.01) 14.9 (0.01)
S02 2763 (1.21) 74.3 (0.03)
Organlcs (as CH4) 6.81 (0.00) 7.47 (0.00)
Total Partlculates 317 (0.14) 50.7 (0.02)
TABLE 6-6. CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS FOR AN OIL-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER IN TEMPORAL UNITS (5 TEST AVERAGE)
kg/hr (Ib/hr)
Pollutant Before Scrubber After Scrubber
NOX (as N02) 22.2 (48.9) 21.4 (47.2)
CO 0.71 (1.58) 0.69 (1.52)
S02 130.7 (288) 3.55 (7.83)
Organlcs (as CH4) 0.34 (0.75) 0.36 (0.79)
Total Partlculates 14.8 (32.5) 2.28 (5.03)
3-97
-------
TABLE 6-7. CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS FOR AN OIL-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER IN THERMAL UNITS (5 TEST AVERAGE)
ng/J (Ib/MM Btu)
Pollutant Before ScrubberAfter Scrubber
•'
NOX (as N02) 168 (0.39) 161 (0.37)
CO 5.47 (0.01) 5.31 (0.01)
S02 993 (2.31) 26.8 (0.06)
Organic* (as CH4) 2.49 (0.01) 2.74 (0.01)
Total Partlculates 113 (0.26) 17.6 (0.04)
TABLE 6-8. CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS FOR AN OIL-FIRED
INDUSTRIAL BOILER IN PRODUCTION RATE UNITS (5 TEST AVERAGE)
mg/Kq Steam (1b/1000 1b. steam)
Pollutant Before Scrubber Arter Scrubber
11 — ------
NOX (as N02) 499 (0.50) 482 (0.48)
CO 16.1 (0.02) 15.5 (0.01)
S02 2945 (2.95) 79.7 (0.08)
Organlcs (as CH4) 7.62 (0.01) 7.99 (0.01)
Total Partlculates 331 (0.33) 51.6 (0.05)
3-98
-------
TABLE 6-10. SUMMARY OF CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS - OIL FIRING
CO
I
UD
<£>
Test No.
202-1 Inlet
202-1 Outlet
202-2 Inlet
202-2 Outlet
202-3 Inlet
202-3 Outlet
202-4 Inlet
202-4 Outlet
203 Inlet
203 Outlet
Average
Inlet
Average
N0x
23.7
22.7
24.0
22.4
24.1
23.6
16.9
16.9
--
22.2
21.4
CO
0.69
0.64
0.71
0.66
0.83
0.78
0.63
0.67
--
0.71
0.69
so2
128
4.35
146
3.98
143
3.53
106
2.33
—
131
3.55
HC
(as
CH4)
0.39
0.45
0.61
0.66
0.25
0.25
0.12
0.08
—
0.34
0.36
kg/hr
C, - C- C, - C,, Organics
1 ,6 „ , mgher
Organics Organics Tha' c
< 0.63
< 0.63
< 0.64
< 0.64
< 0.62
< 0.62
< 0.50
< 0.50
0.02 0.25
0.00 0.04
< 0.60 0.02 0.25
< 0.60 0.00 0.04
Total
Parti culates
22.4
2.74
—
—
7.13
1.82
—
14.8
2.28
-------
TABLE 6-12. PARTICULATE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
BY WEIGHT - TEST 202-1
Aerodynamic Diameter
Size Range, Microns
<}
1 - 3
3 - 10
>10
Scrubber
20
1
74
5
Weight %
Inlet ScruDber Outlet
• — ______ — _
83
12
5
0
TABLE 6-13. EMISSION RATES OF PARTICIPATES
FOR AN OIL-FIRED BOILER IN
TEMPORAL UNITS - TEST 202-1
Aerodynamic Diameter
Size Range, Microns
<1
1 - 3
3 - 10
>10
Total
Scrubber Inl
4.48
0.22
16.6
1.12
22.4
kg/hr
let Scrubber Outlet
2.27
0.33
0.14
0.00
2.74
Removal
Efficiency
49.2
<0
97.4
100
87.8
—
3-100
-------
TABLE 6-14. S02, S03, AND S04" EMISSIONS FROM OIL FIRING
Pollutant
so2
202-1 Inlet
202-1 Outlet
202-4 Inlet
202-4 Outlet
so3
202-1 Inlet
202-1 Outlet
202-4 Inlet
202-4 Outlet
202-4 Inlet
202-4 Outlet
Total
202-1 Inlet
202-1 Outlet
202-4 Inlet
202-4 Outlet
Concen-
tration
mg/m
2582
88.5
2689.2
59.2
20.6
14.6
25.8
18.6
70.4
28.0
Mass
Emission
Rate
g/hr
127,500
4,371
106,060
2,335
1,017
721
1,018
734
2,776
1,140
Thermal
Emission
Rate
ng/J
940
32.2
874
19.2
7.50
5.31
8.39
6.05
22.9
9.10
Production
Emission
Rate
mg/kg steam
2811
96.4
2514
55.4
2F.4
15.9
24.1
17.4
65.8
26.2
% of Fuel Removal
Sulfur Efficiency
Found 1n %
Flue Gas
92
3 97
90
2 98
0.59
0,42 29
0.69
0.50 28
1.58
0.63 60
93
3.6
93
3.1
3-101
-------
TABLE 6-15.
SUMMARY OF SULFATE EMISSIONS
DURING OIL-FIRING - TEST 202-4
mg/m"
Inlet
Outlet
Water Soluble
Add Soluble
Total
39.7 (56%)
30.7 (44*)
70.4
24.5 (88%)
3.5 (12%)
28.0
See Appendix C, Table 15, for details.
TABLE 6-20. CHLORIDE, FLUORIDE, AND NITRATE EMISSIONS
FROM OIL FIRING - TEST 202-4
Inlet
Outlet
mg/m"
ng/J
mg/m"
ng/J
Removal
Chloride (Cl~) 0.46-0.47 0.15 0.22 -0.23 0.072-0.075 52
Fluoride (F~) 0.054 0.017 0.006-0.008 0.002-0.003 89
Nitrate (N03~) 0.24 0.076 0.102 0.033 57
Mass as the 1on.
3-10j2
-------
TABLE 6-21. COMPARISON OF ORGANIC MEASUREMENT METHODS
Test
202-1
202-1
203
203
Method
Total as CH4
(continuous FID)
C-\ - Cg (GC on
bag samples)
C-i - C-|g (GC on
SASS train samples).
>C16
(Gravimetric on
SASS train samples)
Organic
Inlet
8
S12.7
0.469
7.27
Concentration
mg/m^
Outlet
9
S12.7
0.07*
*
1.2
% Change
Not
Significant
—
85%
83$
The values for the XAD-2 resin fraction were calculated using data
obtained from similar sampling trains on four o1l-ftred boilers.
TABLE 4-21. CHLORIDE, FLUORIDE, AND NITRATE
EMISSIONS FROM COAL AND OIL FIRING
T«t
mut
Ogtlit
*i/J
Inllt
itf/J
Outltt
••MOV* I
(Ml IOM 4.7 4«.M4 »•«
OM »«-« 0.15 0.071.0.07$ 10-U
0,11 «0.01 »U *0,« .0.11
0.017 O.OOt-0.00) H.«t 0.078 0.03)
3-103
-------
CO
H-»
O
TABLE 4-23. COMPARISON OF ORGANIC DETERMINATIONS
DURING COAL AND OIL FIRING
Method
Total as CH4
(Continuous FID)
C-j - Ce (GC on Bag
Samples)
C7 - C]6 (GC on SASS
Train Samples)
>C
1$
(Gravimetric on
SASS Train Samples)
Oil Fired
Test Inlet Outlet * Change Test Inlet Outlet % Change
Not
Not
200 3.8 4.6 Significant 202-1 2.9 3.3 Significant
200 i5.4 15.4
200 0.34 0.27
200 2.3 0.33
-20
-85
202-1 54.6 <4.6
203
203
0.17 0.02
2.6 0.43
-85
-83
*The values for the resin sample are calculated (see text).
-------
TABLE 4-30. SUMMARY OF C? - C]6 ORGANICS IN THE WASTE WATER
Carbon
Number
C7
C8
C9
C10
Cll
C12
mg/1
Coal Firing 011
*
ND
ND
ND
0.1 <
ND
ND
Firing
ND
ND
ND
0.1
ND
ND
Carbon
Number
C13
C14
C15
C16
Total
C7 " C16
mg/1
Coal Firing 011
ND
0.1 <
0.1 <
ND
0.4 <
Firing
ND
0.1
0.1
ND
0.3
ND means none detected.
TABLE 4-31. SOLID WASTE PRODUCTION RATES
Test
200
201-1
201-2
201-3
201-4
202-1
202-2
202-3
202-4
203
Bottom
kg/hr
-------
TABLE 4-32. ESTIMATED SCRUBBER CAKE MASS BALANCE
Component
Fly Ash Removed by Scrubber
CaS03'l/2 H20 Formed from S02
Scrubbing and Na2$03 Regeneration
CaS04, CaC03, Na2S03, Ca(OH)2
NaHS04 and Na2S04 Losses (Estimated)
Water
Total
Contribution to Scrubber Cake
kq/
Coal*
324
262
10-85
429-504
1,100
nr
on*
5
210
6-35
193-222
443f
Welqht * ~
Coal*
29
24
1-8
39-46
100
Oil*
1
47
1-8
44-50^
100
Coal firing data are from test 201-1 and oil firing data are from test 202-4
Total cake production rate was estimated from the average of tests 202-1
202-2 and 202-3.
3-106
-------
TABLE 6-28. SOLID WASTE PRODUCTION RATES - OIL FIRING
Test
202-1
202-2
202-3
202-4
203
Bottom Ash
kg/hr ng/J
<1 < 7.4
<1 < 7.4
<1 < 7.6
<1 < 8.3
<1 <11.1
Scrubber Cake
kg/hr
400
550
380
Not Measured
Not Measured
*
yg/J
2.9
4.1
2.9
Scaled up to represent 100X of the flue gas for boiler No. 4.
TABLE 6-29. ESTIMATED SCRUBBER CAKE MASS BALANCE
FOR OIL FIRING - TEST 202-4
Component
Contribution to Scrubber Cake
kg/hrWeight %
Fly Ash Removed by Scrubber
CaS03*l/2 HgO Formed from S02
Scrubbing and
Regeneration
CaS04, CaCCh,
NaHSOa and
(Estimated)
. Ca(OH)2
Losses
210
6 - 35
1
47
1 - 8
Water
Total
193 - 222
443
44 - 50
100
Total cake production rate was estimated from the average of tests
202-1, 202-2 and 202-3.
3-107
-------
STUbY NUMBER 4
-------
STUDY NUMBER 4
DATA AIR EMISSIONS FROM
SOURCE: COMBUSTION OF SOLVENT
REFINED COAL
DATA
STATUS: EPA-600/7-79-004, January 1979
AUTHORS: Kenneth G. Budden and Subhash S. Patel
CONTRACTOR: Hittman Associates, Inc.
9190 Red Branch Road
Columbia, Maryland 21045
PROJECT William J. Rhodes
OFFICER: Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
4-1
-------
AIR EMISSIONS FROM COMBUSTION
OF SOLVENT REFINED COAL
A preliminary report (dated July 1977) on the use of sol vent-refined coal
in a utility boiler was summarized in an earlier data compilation.3 This
final report includes additional information on the industrial processes
sampled plus additional analytical results for C7-C16 organics; polynuclear
aromatic hydrocarbons; infrared spectrometry and gravimetry for organics;
atomic absorption analysis for Hg, As, and Sb; spark source mass spectrometry
for inorganic elemental composition; and additional atomic absorption spectro-
metry for selected elements of interest. For the sake of clarity all process
descriptions, analytical results, and conclusions are presented (or reiterated)
herein.
SRC is a coal that has been cleaned or refined to remove high levels of
sulfur and mineral matter so that burning of the coal will produce a cleaner
effluent gas. This study involved the first attempt to burn SRC on a large
scale in a conventional utility boiler.
This study of SRC involved three sampling runs:
I. Low-sulfur Kentucky coal (~1% sulfur), burned in an unmodified
22.5 MW pulverized coal boiler.
II. Low-sulfur Kentucky coal (-1% sulfur), burned in the same boiler
with dual register burners.
III. SRC, produced at the Fort Lewis, Washington, pilot plant from Kentucky
coal having 4% sulfur and 10-12% ash, burned in the same boiler with
dual register burners and appropriate modifications.
Figure 4-1 (from the document) shows the sampling points for effluent gas
sampling in this study. Gaseous grab samples, using Level 1 techniques, were
employed for sampling and analysis for 02, N2, CO, C02, and SO . NO and SO
A A X
were also monitored by continuous monitors, a thermal Electron NO analyzer,
^
and a Theta Sensor SO monitor, located downstream from the precipitator. A
-------
WICIWATO* NO. 1
CONTINUOUS
X SAMPLER
PRECIPITATOR NO. 2
OUTLET
B SAMPLING
PORT
OUTLET SAMPLING
PORT
DAMPER
PRECIPITATOR NO. 3
PRECIPITATOR NO. 4
Figure 4-1. Diagram of sampling locations.
4-3
-------
SASS train was used to sample effluent gases in runs II and III, and a Level 1
inorganic and organic analysis protocol was performed on the SASS train samples
Solid grab samples of coal and SRC from runs II and III were collected for
Level 1 inorganic analysis. In addition to these Level 1 analyses, GC/MS
analysis for polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons was also run on the SASS organic
samples, the SRC, and the coal.
Based on Level 1 results, two Level 2 SASS sampling runs and analyses
were performed to further compare SRC and coal. Because nonvolatile hydro-
carbons and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons had not been found in detectabl
quantities, only C7-C12 hydrocarbon analysis was run on these samples. Atomi
absorption analysis was run on 17 elements that had been shown to be present
in significant quantities by Level 1 SSMS.
Significant results and conclusions of this study were:
1. SRC is a feasible replacement fuel for low-sulfur coal. No malor
operational problems were encountered.
2. SRC use produced significant reductions in emitted levels of SO
NO , and inorganics, as compared to low-sulfur coal. Emissions*^
S0£ from SRC would meet the present NSPS requirement of 0.52 ka/?i
input but might not meet newly proposed and more stringent NSPS
requirements. (See Table 4-1.) It should be noted that, althoimK
NO levels are well below NSPS requirements, these tests were con
ducted with abnormally high excess air, which lowers NO levels
Further tests at normal conditions are recommended. x
Organic analysis showed no detectable levels of carcinogenic PAH
and levels of organics in the C7-C12 hydrocarbon range that wer»
significantly different from low- sulfur coal. re
It is significant to note that no sampling or analysis was performed
the refining solvents or wastes from recovery of refining solvents.
3.
not
TABLE 4-1. SRC EMISSIONS
S02
NO^
Average
emission
level
(Kg/GJ input)
0.46
0.19
Current
NSPS
requirement
(Kg/GJ input)
0.52
0.30
Proposed
new NSPS
requirement
(Kg/GJ input)
26
__
-------
LEVEL 1
4-5
-------
TABLE 4-2. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SRC SAMPLE
(M9/9)
U 1
Th
Bi
Pb 5
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt 0.9
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce 0.2
La 0.3
Ba 4
Cs 0.5"
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag 0.2
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
6
0.3
2
0.9
2
0.5
0.6
0.5
0.1
0.4
8
4
5
0.2
30
3
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
3
2
30
0.1
200
20
3
30
9
300
10
40
30
40
10
0.2
0.2
^Elements designated as "<" were Identified, but because of their low concen-
trations, could not be quantified as accurately.
4-6
-------
TABLE 4-3. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SASS TRAIN SAMPLE, JUNE 19, 1977
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
19
8
3
0.5
0.2
0.1
1
1
1
0.3
2
0.2
0.5
1
Oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
2
0.3
1
0.5
2
2
1
8
6
44
0.2
1
0.2
2
3
1
4
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
N1
Co
Fe
Mn
17
30
113
42
68
1
30
2
43
12
29
87
41
38
8
39,850
160
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
371
241
13,290
20
49,830
798
71
730
666
10,950
146
10,950
365
24
289
10
5
4-7
-------
TABLE 4-4. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SASS TRAIN SAMPLE, JUNE 16, 1977
(pg/g)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
34
24
5
0.5
0.2
0.2
3
1
3
0.6
4
0.5
3
4
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
7
2
5
2
11
16
5
21
17
780
2
0.6
0.4
2
8
1
0.2
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
27
63
295
118
149
4
3
10
57
8
28
39
44
93
18
70,345
311
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
s
p
Si
AT
Mg
Na
p
1
B
Be
Lf
70,415
35,430
45,750
30
140,830
35,140
16
21,/flb
36,200
21,100
211
21,100
331
T f\
19
257
14
5
4-8
-------
Sample
TABLE 4-5. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
SRC SASS TRAIN SAMPLE, JUNE 14, 1977
(pg/m3)
As
Hg
Sb
SASS train
1.42
2.06
3.57
Sample
TABLE 4-6. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
COAL GRAB SAMPLES, MAY 25, 1977
(pg/g)
As
Hg
Sb
Sample I
Sample II
2.9
0.3
1.7
Sample
TABLE 4-7. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
COAL SASS TRAIN SAMPLE, MAY 25, 1977
As
Sb
SASS train
2.32
0.57
4.55
4-9
-------
TABLE 4-8. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
SRC GRAB SAMPLES, JUNE 14, 1977
(pg/g)
Sample As Hg Sb
Sample I 1.8 0.8 0.1
Sample II
TABLE 4-9. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
COMBINED PARTICULATES AND XAD-2 RESIN
(ppm)
Sample As Hg Sb
SRC 14 .045 ND
ND = None detected, antimony detection limit is 0.005 ppm
TABLE 4-10. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
COMBINED PARTICULATES AND XAD-2 RESIN
(|jg/m3)
Date As Hg Sb
June 19, 1977 21.55 11.66 1.76
4-10
-------
TABLE 4-11. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
COMBINED PARTICIPATES AND XAD-2 RESIN
(M9/ma)
Date As Hg Sb
June 16, 1977 78.72 6.73 1.89
TABLE 4-12. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
COAL AND SRC
Date As Hg Sb
Coal 2.32 0.57 4.55
SRC 1.42 2.06 3.57
4-11
-------
TABLE 4-13. FIXED GASES
GRAB SAMPLES, PHASE I (COAL COMBUSTION)
% (ppm)
Date
5/26
5/31
6/2
5/25
5/29
5/30
ND = None
Date
5/24
5/27
5/28
6/5
6/6
02
13.31
(133,100)
14.24
(142,400)
14.91
(149,100)
15.73
(157,300)
13.70
(137,000)
12.60
(126,000)
detected.
02*
NR
NR
13.78
(137,800)
11.25
(112,500)
12.14
(121,400)
11.16
(111,600)
C02
7.40
(74,000)
7.50
(75,000)
6.56
(65,600)
5.51
(55,100)
7.59
(75,900)
7. 35
(73,500)
TABLE 4-14. FIXED
% (ppm)
C02*
NR
NR
6.65
(66,500)
9.86
(98,600)
9.31
(93,100)
9. 69
(96 ',900)
CO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NO
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
GASES
CO1"
NR
NR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
N2
79.29
(792,900)
78.26
(782,600)
78.53
(785,300)
78.76
(787,600)
78.71
(787,100)
80.05
(800,000)
N2*
NR
NR
79.66
(796,600)
78.89
(788,900)
78.55
(785,500)
79.15
(791,500)
ND - None detected.
NR = None reported.
*±2 percent of total concentration.
^40 ppm detectable limit.
4-12
-------
TABLE 4-15. SULFUR GASES
GRAB SAMPLES, PHASE III - COAL COMBUSTION
(ppm)
Date SO * S0x*
5/26
5/31
6/2
5/25
5/29
5/30
5/24
5/27
5/28
6/5
6/6
*±2
±10
percent of total
ppm.
TABLE 4-16
GRAB SAMPLES,
254
329
174
413
209
413
—
311
381
214
210
concentration.
260
360
200
500
220
400
745
330
330
200
180
. NITROGEN OXIDE GASES
PHASE II - COAL COMBUSTION
(ppm)
Date NO *
5/26
5/31
6/2
5/25
5/29
5/30
5/24
5/27
5/28
6/5
6/6
110
110
100
170
160
150
225
215
220
170
110
*±10 ppm.
4-13
-------
TABLE 4-17. GC ANALYSIS, C^Cg
GRAB SAMPLES, PHASE III - COAL COMBUSTION
Date
5/24
5/25
5/26
5/27
5/28
5/29
5/30
5/31
6/2
6/5
6/6
CfC6
NR
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
Detectable limit
NR
5 ppm
5 ppm
5 ppm
0.5 ppm
0.5 ppm
0.5 ppm
0.5 ppm
0.5 ppm
0.5 ppm
0.5 ppm
NR = None reported.
ND = None detected.
TABLE 4-18. FIXED GASES
GRAB SAMPLES, PHASE III - SRC COMBUSTION
% (ppm)
Date
6/15
6/18
6/19
6/14
6/20
02*
14.97
(149,700)
13.25
(132,500)
14.00
(140,000)
13.65
(136,500)
NR
NR
co,*
5.88
(58,800)
6.73
(67,300)
6.26
(62,600)
7.53
(75,300)
NR
NR
CO*
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
NR
NR
N2*
79.33
(793,300)
80.02
(800,200)
79.74
(797,400)
78.82
(788,200)
NR
NR
ND = None detected.
NR - None reported.
*±2 percent of total concentration.
^40 ppm detectable limit.
4-14
-------
TABLE 4-19. FIXED GASES
GRAB SAMPLES, PHASE II - SRC COMBUSTION
% (ppm)
Date
6/21
6/13
6/16
6/17
6/22
02*
NR
NR
11.39
(113,900)
10.62
(106,200)
11.11
(111,100)
11.20
(112,000)
C02T
NR
NR
9.86
(98,600)
9.12
(91,200)
9.15
(91,500)
9. 25
(92,500)
CO*
NR
NR
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
N2*
NR
NR
78.75
(787,500)
80.26
(802,600)
79.74
(797,400)
79.55
(795,500)
ND = None detected.
NR - None reported.
*±2 percent of total concentration.
~40 ppm detectable limit.
Date
6/23
6/24
TABLE
GRAB SAMPLES,
02*
10.75
(107,500)
10.76
(107,600)
4-20. FIXED
PHASE II - SRC
X (ppm)
C02f
8.90
(89,000)
9.29
(92,900)
GASES
COMBUSTION
CO*
ND
ND
ND
ND
N.'
80.35
(803,500)
79.95
(799,500)
ND = None detected.
NR = None reported.
*±2 percent of total concentration.
'40 ppm detectable limit.
4-15
-------
TABLE 4-21. SULFUR GASES
GRAB SAMPLES, PHASE III - SRC COMBUSTION
(ppm)
Date
6/15
6/18
6/19
6/14
6/20
6/21
6/13
6/16
6/17
6/22
6/23
6/24
so/
198
216
218
248
NR
NR
371
410
404
400
393
449
sor
X
225
220
235
260
NR
NR
325
335
345
345
325
380
NR = None reported.
*±2 percent of total concentration.
ppm.
4-16
-------
TABLE 4-22. NITROGEN OXIDE GASES
GRAB SAMPLES, PHASE III - SRC COMBUSTION
(ppm)
Date N0x*
6/15 125
6/18 120
6/19 125
6/14 160
6/20 NR
6/21 NR
6/13 190
6/16 190
6/17 190
6/22 200
6/23 220
6/24 260
NR = None reported
*± 10 ppm
4-17
-------
TABLE 4-23. GC ANALYSIS, CX-C6
GRAB SAMPLES, PHASE III - SRC COMBUSTION
Date CrC6*
6/15 ND
6/18 ND
6/19 ND
6/14 ND
6/20 NR
6/21 NR
6/13 NO
6/16 NO
6/17 NO
6/22 ND
6/23 ND
6/24 ND
ND = None detected.
NR = None reported.
*0.5 ppm detectable limit. Clf C2, C3, C4, C5, and C6
were reported separately but results were the same as
indicated above.
-13
-------
TABLE 4-24. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
June 19, 1977
Gas
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90 -
110 -
140 -
160 -
180 -
200 -
110
140
160
180
200
220
Volatile
weight, ppm No. of
(mg/m3) peaks
0*
0.09
0.05
0.03
0.09
0.05
0
0.04
0
0
JNot usually included in TCO range, i.e., C8-C18.
'Zero values represent a detection limit of 0.007
TABLE 4-25. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
June 16, 1977
Gas
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90 -
110 -
140 -
160 -
' 180 -
200 -
110
140
160
180
200
220
Volatile
weight, ppm No. of
(mg/nr) peaks
0*
0.12
0
0.20
0.06
0.03
0
0.004
0
0
?Not usually included in TCO range, i.e., C8-C18.
Zero values represent a detection limit of 0.007
represent a detection limit of 0.007 mg.
4-19
-------
TABLE 4-26. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
SRC - JUNE 14, 1977
Gas
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
*Not
Gas
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90 - 110
110 - 140
140 - 160
160 - 180
180 - 200
200 - 220
usually Included
TABLE 4-27. GAS
COAL -
Range
90 - 110
110 - 140
140 - 160
160 - 180
180 - 200
200 - 220
Volatile
weight, ppm No. of
(mg/m3) peaks
NR
0.11 NR
0.30 NR
0.19 NR
0.84 NR
0.49 NR
in TCO range, i.e., C8~C18.
CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
MAY 25, 1977
Volatile
weight, ppm No. of
(mg/m3) peaks
0.58 NR
NR
0.34 NR
0.08 NR
0.52 NR
0.57 NR
*Not usually included in TCO range, i.e., C8-Cir>.
4-2G
-------
TABLE 4-28. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
COAL - MAY 25, 1977
Gas
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
*Not usually
T = Trace.
TABLE
Gas
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90 - 110
110 - 140
140 - 160
160 - 180
180 - 200
200 - 220
Included
4-29. GAS
SRC -
Range
90 - 110
110 - 140
140 - 160
160 - 180
180 - 200
200 - 220
Volatile
weight, ppm
0.58
T
0.34
0.08
0.52
0.57
in TCO range, i.e. , C8-C
CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
JUNE 14, 1977
(ug/m3)
Volatile
weight, ppm
NO
0.11
0.30
0.19
0.84
0.49
No. of
peaks
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
16-
No. of
peaks
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
NR
*Not usually included in TCO range, I.e., C8-C16.
ND - None detected.
NR = None reported.
4-21
-------
TABLE 4-30
IR REPORT
SAMPLE- XAD-2 Resin Blank, (analysis on nonvolatile residue. of extract) June 16, 197
Way* Numb«r
(cm'1)
NR
Intensity
Trace
Auignmint ComminU
benzene derivatives (680 ppm)
_j
NR = not reported TABLE 4-31
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: Probe rinse, (analysis on nonvolatile residue of extract) June 16, 1977
Wave Numbir
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
NR
NR
NR
Atxignmtnt Comments
esters of benzoic acid and other carboxylic acids '
glycol . !
phenolic resin (640 ppm) i
i
I
i
i
i
i
i
t
NR 3 not reported
-------
TABLE 4-32
IR REPORT
8AMKE: XALJ-2 Module Condensote Extract Plus Module Rinse, (analysis on nonvolatile
extract of residue) June 16, 1977
Wive Number
(cm-1)
NR
NR
NR
Intimity
NR
NR
NR
Assignment Comments
phthali^ arid pqfpr
nthPr rarhnvylir arid psters
phenolic resin (1,600 ppm)
NR =
SAMPLE:
not reported
XAD-2 Resin, (analysis on nonvolatile extract of residue) June 16, 1977
TABLE 4-33
IR REPORT
Wavi Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
Intimity
NR
NR
Minor
•
Assignment Comments
aliphatic carboxylates
glycol
benzene derivatives (1,100 ppm)
\ ,
NR = not reported
4-23
-------
TABLE 4-34
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: Methylenp r^inv^Ho Rlank. (analysis on nonvolatile residue.). June 16. 1Q?7
Wiva Numbar
(cm-1)
NR
NR
Intimity
NR
NR
Anignmint Commants
p«;tf»r<; nf hpn?n1r flrlrl and nthpr r^rhnyyl-jr nr^d-
phenolic resin (3,700 ppm)
—4
TABLE 4-35
IR REPORT
SAMPLE- Methanol Blank, (analysis on nonvolatile residue) June 16, 1977
Wivi Numbir
(cm'1)
Intansity
Asjignmtnt
Comments
NR
NR
phthalic acid ester
NR
salt of carboxylic acid
NR
NR
phenolic resin (500 ppm)
NR = not reported
4-24
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 4-36
IR REPORT
Methylene Chloride-Methanol Blank (5Qi-5Q^)t (analysis on .nonvolatile residue)
June 16, 1977
Ww Nimibtf
(cm'1}
NR
NR
NR
Intimity
NR
NR
NR
Assignment Comments
esters of benzole acid and other carooxylir ariri<;
glycol
phenolic resin (1,200 ppm)
NR = not reported
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
Wivt Numbir
(cm'1)
Intimity
Assignmint
Comments
4-25
-------
TABLE 4-37
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
PrnhP R1P<». Analysis nn nonvolatile residue.1 June 19. 1911.
W«v« Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
NR
NR
NR
Assignment Comments
Asters of benzole acid and other carboxvlir arjrfs
alvcol
ohenolic resin (660 com)
NR = not reported
TABLE 4-38
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: XAD-2. Module Condensate Extract Plus Module Rinse, (analysis.on
residue) June 19, 1977
Wave Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
Major
Minor
Minor
Minor
•
-
Assignment Comments
aliphatic carboxylates !
phthalates
benzoates
phenolic resin (1,700 ppm)
;
' ~~~1
NR = not reported
4-25
-------
SAMPLE: XAD-?
TABLE 4-39
IR REPORT
(analysis on nonvolatile residue of extract) June 19. 1977
Wav* Numtatr
(cnT1)
NR
NR
NR
Intimity
NR
NR
Trace
Assignment Commints
esters of aliphatic carboxyllc acid and benzole
acid
glycol
benzene derivatives (700 ppm)
NR a not reported
SAMPLE:
TABLE 4-40
IR REPORT
Methylene Chloride Blank, (analysis on nonvolatile residue of extract)
June 19, 1977
Wave Numbtr
Urn'1)
NR
NR
**
Inttnsity
NR
NR
•
Assignment Commints
esters of benzole acid and other carboxvlic acids
phenolic resin (3,700 ppm)
not reported
4-27
-------
SAMPLE: Methanol Blank,
TABLE 4-41
IR REPORT
_fln nonvolatile residue) June 19. 1977
Wivt Numbtr
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
Intercity
NR
NR
NR
Assignment Comments
phthalic acid ester
L$a1t of carboxvlic acid
ohenolic resin (5QQ ooml
NR = not reported
TABLE 4-42
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: Methvlene Chloride-Methanol Blank fSQ*-S(ttl. (analysis on nonvolatile
June 19, 1977
Wivt Number
(cm'1)
NR
NR
NR
Intensity
NR
NR
NR
•
Assignment Comments
esters of benzole add and other carboxvlic ariris
glycol
phenolic resin (1,200 ppml
NR = not reported
4-28
-------
TABLE 4-43
IR REPORT
5AMP1*' XAD-2 Res1n Blank- fanalvsis on nonvolatile residue) June 19. 1977
Wtvt Numbtr
(cm'1)
NR
Intinslty
Trace
Atilgmmnt CommenU
benzene derivatives (680 ppm)
NR = not reported
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
Wave Numb«
(cm'1)
Intimity
Assignment
Comments
4-2S
-------
LEVEL 2
4-30
-------
TABLE 17. AA ANALYSIS FOR INORGANICS
Constituent
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Boron
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Thorium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Coal SASS
train run
May 25, 1977
yg*
24,016
135
69
1,430
7
1,694
246
1 185
37,624
4,096
884
17
2,441
236
6
364
382
yg/«
809.98
4.55
2.32
48.23
0.24
57.13
8.30
6.24
1,268.94
138.15
29.81
0.57
82.33
7.96
0.20
12.28
12.88
SRC
train
June 14
ug*
6,150
102
41
335
56
475
18
40
22,869
1,656
1,789
59
385
31
101
1,269
258
SASS
run
, 1977
ug/m
215.03
3.57
1.42
11.71
1.95
16.61
0.63
1.40
799.62
57.90
62.55
2.06
13.46
1.08
3.53
5.91
9.02
Coal
s am
May 25
Sample I
yg/g**
5,223.0
1.7
2.9
58.0
ND
13.0
16.0
9.0
3,352.0
340.0
21.0
0.3
12.0
4.7
1.3
24.1
12.5
grab
pies
, 1977
Sample 11
yg/g**
4,506.0
—
—
—
—
4.5
14.0
7.5
2,503.0
370.0
21.0
—
10.5
4.2
1.4
20.0
50.0
SRC grab
samples
June 14, 1977
Sample 1
yg/g**
60.0
0.1
1.8
2.0
0.2
4.0
1.2
0.5
187.0
8.0
14.5
0.8
2.0
5.0
0.8
11.4
6.5
Sample II
ug/g**
95.0
—
— -
—
0.5
6.0
1.5
ND
250.0
12.0
18.0
—
2.3
3.7
1.3
10.9
7.5
K>
ND - None Detected
* - Total amount of element detected in sample
** - Concentration of element per gram of sample
-------
ADDITIONAL DATA
4-3?
-------
TABLE 1. PHASE II - COAL COMBUSTION TEST SAMPLING SCHEDULE
DaCe
Load Condition
SASS Train
Sampling Location
May 24
Hay 25
Kay 26
May 27
May 28
May 29
May 30
May 31
June 1
June 5
June 6
Full
Medium
Low
Full
Full
Medium
Medium
tow
Low
Full
Full
Outlet ESP 01
Outlet ESP ffl
Outlet ESP #1
Outlet ESP #1
Inlet ESP n
Inlet ESP #1
Outlet ESP tfl
Outlet ESP #1
Inlet ESP 01
Outlet ESP 03
Outlet ESP #3
TABLE 2. PHASE III - SRC COAL COMBUSTION TEST SAMPLING
SCHEDULE
Date
Load Condition
SASS Train
Sampling Location
June 13
June 14
June IS
June 16
June 17
June 18
June 19
June 20
June 21
June 22
June 23
June 24
Full
Medium
Low
Full
Full
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
Full
Full
"wide open"
Outlet ESP #1
Outlet ESP n
Outlet BSP 01
Outlet ESP n
Inlet ,ESP #1
Inlet ESP #1
Outlet ESP 01
Inlet ESP #1
Outlet ESP n
Outlet ESP #3
Cutlet ESP #3
Outlet ESP #1
4-33
-------
TABLE 5. COMBUSTION TEST, PHASE II - COAL SAMPLES
Proximate Analysis
Date
Sulfur
Nitrogen
Heating*
Value, MJ/kg
5/26
5/31
6/2
5/25
5/29
5/30
5/24
5/27
5/28
6/5
6/6
0.64
1.05
NA
1.09
0.62
1.15
1.34
0.73
0.72
0.66
0.64
1.38
1.81
NA
1.29
1.82
1.82
1.19
1.51
1.45
1.60
1.81
7.144
7.043
NA
7.007
7.139
7.139
7.042
7.081
7.079
NA
7.143
NA - Not Available
*Moisture and Ash Free Basis
TABLE 6. COMBUSTION TEST. PHASE III - SRC SAMPLES
Date
Sulfur
Proximate Analysis
X Nitrogen
Heating*
Value, MJ/kg
6/15
6/18
6/19
6/14
6/13
6/16
6/17
6/22
6/23
6/24
0.70
0.74
0.66
0.72
0.73
0.73
0.72
0.70
0.64
0.66
1.54
1.80
1.82
1.62
2.02
1.77
1.47
1.37
1.37
1.71
7.530
NA
7.496
7.525
7.459
7.464
7.546
7.485
7.431
7.418
NA - Not Available
*Molsture and Ash Free Basis
4-34
-------
TABLE 7. PROCESS INFORMATION
Date: June 16, 1977
Load:
Fuel Flow:
Heating Value:
Stack Gas Temperature:
Sample Volume:
Precipitator:
Sample Port:
Precipitator Efficiency:
Gas Flow, ESP II Outlet:
21 MW
8,063 kg SRC/hr (17,775 Ib/hr)
7.464 MJ/kg SRC (15,602 Btu/lb)
166°C (331°F)
28,46 m3 (1,005 DSCF)
#1
B (Outlet #1)
16,89*
3,620 m3/minuta (127,858 ACFM)
D«te: June 19, 1977
Load:
Fuel Flow:
Heating Value:
Stack Gas Temperature:
Sample Volume:
Precipitator:
Sample Port:
Precipitator Efficiency:
Gas Flow, ESP #1 Outlet:
7.5 MW
3,379 kg SRC/hr (7,450 Ib/hr)
7.496 MJ/kg SRC (15,668 Btu/lb)
147°C (296°F)
30.16 m3 (1,065 DSCF)
#1
B (Outlet //I)
45.68%
2,005 m3/minute (70,793 ACFM)
4-35
-------
TABLE 15. PROCESS INFORMATION
Date: May 25, 1977
Load:
Fuel Flow:
Heating Value:
Stack Gas Temperature:
Sample Volume:
Preclpitator:
Sample Port:
Precipltator Efficiency:
Gas Flow, ESP #1 Outlet:
14 MW
6,940 kg coal/hr
(15,300 Ib/hr)
7.007 MJ/kg (14,648 Btu/lb)
147°C (296°F)
29.65 m3 (1,047 DSCF)
#1
B (Outlet #1)
94.812
3,002 m /minute (105,997 ACFM)
Date: June 14, 1977
Load:
Fuel Flow:
Heating Value:
Stack Gas Temperature:
Sample Volume:
Precipitater:
Sample Port:
Preclpitator Efficiency:
Gas Flow, ESP #1 Outlet:
14 MW
5,460 kg SRC/hr
(12,038 Ib/hr)
7,525 MJ/kg (15,729 Btu/lb)
144°C (291°F)
28.60 m3 (1,010 DSCF)
//I
B (Outlet #1)
21.96Z
3,076 m3/minute (108,632 ACFM)
4-36
-------
TABLE 19. INORGANIC AIR EMISSIONS FOR COAL AND SRC
Constituent
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Boron
Chromium
Copper
Lead
Iron
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Thorium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Coal
May 25. 1977
jig/nr*
809.98
A. 55
2.32
48.23
0.24
57.13
8.30
6.24
1,268.94
138.15
29.81
0.57
82.33
7.96
0.20
12.28
12.88
SRC
June 14. 1977
fjg/m**
215.03
3.57
1.42
11.71
1.95
16.61
0.63
1.40
799.62
57.60
62.55
2.06
13.46
1.08
3.53
5.91
9.02
*The concentrations are based on amount of a constituent detected in the
total particulates collected.
4-37
-------
TABLE 20. SO
AND NO EMISSIONS FOR COAL AND SRC
X
u>
00
Load Condition
Low ( 7.5 MW)
Low
Low
Average
Medium ( 14 XV)
Medium
Medium
Average
Full ( 21 KW)
Full
Full
Average
Total Average
Dace
5/26/77
5/31/77
6/01/77
5/25/77
5/29/77
5/30/77
5/24/77
5/27/77
5/28/77
1
i
i
Coal
S°2
0.645
1.023
0.598
0.757
0.800
0.791
0.791
0.796
1.002
0.441
0.456
U.727
*
(1.50)
(2.38)
(1.39)
(1.76)
(1.86)
(1.84)
(1-84)
(1.85)
(2.33)
(1.03)
(1.06)
(1.47)
1.69
NO^*
0.198
0.224
0.215
0.211
0.194
0.215
0.215
0.201
0.215
0.201
0.220
0.215
0.211
(0.46)
(0.52)
(0.50)
(0.49)
(0.45)
(0.50)
(0.50)
(0.48)
(0.50)
(0.48)
(0.51)
(0.50)
0.49
Date
6/15/77
6/18/77
6/19/77
6/14/77
6/20/77
6/21/77
6/13/77
6/16/77
6/17/77
0.520
0.452
0.486
0.486
0.439
0.477
0.447
0.456
0.426
0.412
0.434
0.426
SRC
(1.21) 0.201
(1.05) 0.176
(1.13) 0.176
(1.13) 0.185
(1.02) 0.194
(1.11) 0.211
(1.04) 0.194
(1.06) 0.198
(0.99) 0.176
(0.97) 0.168
(1.01) 0.172
(0.99) 0.172
(1.06) 0.185
(0.48)
(0.41)
(0.41)
(0.43)
(0.45)
(0.49)
(0.45)
(0.46)
(0.41)
(0.39)
(0.40)
(0.40)
(0.43)
% Reduction
19.33
55.88
18.71
35.80
45.16
39.67
43.48
42.70
57.51
5.83
4.72
32.65
37.28
-4.35
21.15
18.00
12.24
O.OO
2.00
10.00
4.17
18.00
18.75
21.57
20.00
12.24
*Values are in kfc/GJ and (lb/10 bto)
-------
TABLE 21. COMPARISON OF SRC AIR EMISSIONS WITH MEG's
i
u>
1C
Constituent
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Boron
Chromium
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Thorium
Uranium
Vanadium
Zinc
Minimum Acute
Toxlcity Effluent
Based on
Health
Effects*
5,200
500
2
500
3,100
1
200
150
6,000
5,000
50
15
9
500
4,000
Based on
Ecological
Effects*
___
___
10
1
Ambient Level Goal
Based on
Health
Effects*
12.6
1.2
0.005
1
74
0.002
0.5
0.36
14
12
0.01
0.035
0.5
1.2
9.5
Based on
Ecological
Effects*
— — —
1
0.1
Elimination
of Discharge
Natural
Background*
0.007
0.00005
0
0.012-0.001
0.01-0.41
0.002-O.47
1.4-800
0.005-0.047
0.0006-0.021
0.005-0.024
0.013-0.2
SRC
June 14, 1977*
215.03
3.57
1.42
11.71
1.95
16.61
0.63
799.62
1.40
57.90
62.55
2.06
13.46
1.08
3.53
5.91
9.02
* Values are in pg/m
Values have not yet been developed
-------
STUDY NUMBER 5
-------
STUDY NUMBER 5
DATA CHARACTERIZATION OF COAL
SOURCE: PILE DRAINAGE
DATA
STATUS: EPA-600/7-79-051, February 1979
AUTHORS: Doye B. Cox, Tien-Yung J. Chu,
and Richard J. Ruane
CONTRACTOR: Tennessee Valley Authority
1320 Commerce Union Bank Building
Chattanooga, Tennessee 37401
Interagency Agreement No. EPA-IAG-D5-E-721
PROJECT Michael C. Osborne
OFFICER: Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
5-1
-------
This document presents results of field studies on the chemical composi
tion of coal-pile drainage at two TVA coal-fired steam plants. A large reserve
(about 25-100 acres of coal, piled 8-12 meters high) is maintained as a safety
factor for electric generation (see Figure 5-1 from the final report), and
drainage from rainfall percolating through the coal is very acidic and mineral
rich. Rainfall was measured at both plants; runoff was measured at one plant.
Laboratory studies were directed toward a procedure that could be used to
predict the chemical composition of drainage from these coal storage piles
without resorting to extensive field sampling programs or long-term leaching
studies. An 18~kg sample of coal was separated into three size fractions and
each fraction was subjected to proximate analysis, ultimate analysis, and
sulfur forms analysis. Ashed subsamples wero analyzed for SiO.^, Al.^0;,,
Fe203, CaO, TiO, MgO, S03, Na20, K20, Mn, Pb, and Cu by atomic absorption
(AAS) or emission spectrometry (ES).
The coal-pile drainage .samples were analyzed for acidity (amount of stand-
ard CaCO;, solution to bring pH to 7.0), pH, conductivity, Cl, S04, dissolved
solids, suspended solids, Fe, Mn, Si02, Cu, Zn, Cr, Al, Ni, Ca, Mg, Pb, Hy. Ba,
As, Cd, Se, Ti, Be, and Sb. Elemental analysis was by AAS or ES, as appropriate.
In addition to analysis of the coal-pile drainage, bench studies were con-
ducted to determine the ability of fly-ash slurry to treat coal-pile drainage.
Note that the laboratory-simulated leaching procedure, using a shaker and dei-
onized water, did not produce a leachate equivalent to the field-collected coal-
pile leachate.
According to the abstract of the final report,
Results indicate that coal pile drainage is highly acidic with
pH's of 2.2 to 3.1. Total suspended solids concentrations,
generally low during base flow periods, increase dramatically
during storm runoff to levels as high as 2300 mg/liter. Sulfate
concentrations were also quite high: 1800 to 9600 mg/liter.
Concentrations of Fe and Mn were both very high: 23 to 1800 and
1.8 to 45 mg/liter, respectively. Other substances with concen-
trations of note include Al, Zn, Hg, As, and Se. Characteristics
of elutes from shaker-type laboratory studies, except for pH, do
not reflect values from field drainage of the same stored coal.
Treatment with alkaline fly ash slurries, using ash sluicing
ratios commonly encountered, can effectively raise the final
solution pH and remove a variety of metals from solution. It was
also observed that about 73% of the total rainfall is direct runoff.
5-2
-------
DRAINAGE AREA « 53.3 ACRES (£1.6 ho)
TO ASH
POND
en
COLLECTION
SUMP
Figure 5-1. Coal pile and drainage collection system, plant J.
-------
LEVEL 1
5-4
-------
TABLE 5-1. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, MARCH 9, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.9
2,400 umhos/cm
550 mg/L
3,200 mg/L
1,700 mg/L (CaC03)
0 mg/L
2,600 mg/L
TABLE 5-2. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, APRIL 7, 1976
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Ac i d i ty
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.6
2,400 pmhos/cm
110 mg/L
2,500 mg/L
1,100 mg/L (CaC03)
20 mg/L
1,800 mg/L
TABLE 5-3. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, APRIL 13, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.8
5,300 mg/L (CaC03)
TABLE 5-4. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, APRIL 29, 1976
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.5
5,200 umhos/cm
150 mg/L
9,400 mg/L
4,500 mg/L
5-5
-------
TABLE 5-5. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, MAY 5, 1976
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
Assigned
concentration
3.0
4,600 umhos/cm
140 mg/L
6,800 mg/L
2,200 mg/L (CaC03)
3,100 mg/L
TABLE 5-6. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS
PLANT J, MAY 14, 1976
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.9
120 mg/L
7,500 mg/L
2,400 mg/L (CaCO;,)
TABLE 5-7. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, MAY 26, 1976
TABLE 5-8. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS
PLANT J, JUNE 9, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
SO,
Assigned
concentration
3.0
8 mg/L
3,100 mg/L
1,400 mg/L (CaCOn)
2,700 mg/L
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
sol ids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
3.0
4,000 umhos/cm
2,300 mg/L
5,900 mg/L
300 mg/L (CaCO:t)
4,500 mg/L
5-6
-------
TABLE 5-9. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, JUNE 17, 1976
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.8
5,300 pmhos/cm
210 mg/L
11,000 mg/L
5,500 mg/L (CaC03)
7,200 mg/L
TABLE 5-10. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, JUNE 22, 1979
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.9
4,200 (jmhos/cm
1,400 mg/L
7,400 mg/L
3,700 mg/L (CaCOn)
4,600 mg/L
TABLE 5-11. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, JULY 1, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.3
5,600 |.imhos/c:m
440 mg/L
13,000 mg/L
6,100 mg/L (CaC03)
7,400 mg/L
TABLE 5-12. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, JULY 7, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
3.0
280 mg/L
3,500 mg/L
1,700 mg/L (CaC03)
1,800 mg/L
5-7
-------
TABLE 5-13. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, JULY 29, 1976
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
sol ids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
C1
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.9
5,400 umhos/cm
46 mg/L
12,000 mg/L
5,900 mg/L (CaC03)
7,800 mg/L
TABLE 5-14. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS
PLANT J, AUGUST 27, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
sol ids
Ac i d i ty
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
3.1
5,900 umhos/cm
61 mg/L
16,000 mg/L
7,100 mg/L (CaC03)
7,600 mg/L
TABLE 5-15. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, SEPTEMBER 1, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
SO,,
Assigned
concentration
2.6
5,500 umhos/cm
170 mg/L
14,000 mg/L
5,900 mg/L (CaCo3)
9,600 mg/L
TABLf 5-16. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS
PLANT J, SEPTEMBER 8, 1976
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
SO,
Assigned
concentration
2.5
3,700 umhos/cm
75 mg/L
7,600 mg/L
3,600 mg/L (CaC03)
3,700 mg/L
5-8
-------
TABLE 5-17. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, SEPTEMBER 29, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
3.0
4,400 umhos/cm
480 mg/L
6,300 mg/L
3,900 mg/L (CaC03)
TABLE 5-18. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, OCTOBER 6, 1976
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
3.0
4,700 umhos/cm
1,900 mg/L
8,400 mg/L
340 mg/L (CaC03)
TABLE 5-19. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, OCTOBER 13, 1976
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.3
4,400 umhos/cm
39 mg/L
4,700 mg/L
3,100 mg/L (CaC03)
3,800 mg/L
TABLE 5-20. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, OCTOBER 20, 1976
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
sol ids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
3.1
4,300 ^mhos/cm
74 mg/L
7,700 mg/L
3,800 mg/L (CaC03)
8,000 mg/L
5-9
-------
TABLE 5-21. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT J, OCTOBER 27, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Ac i d i ty
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.9
3,300 umhos/cm
63 mg/L
5,800 mg/L
3,900 mg/L (CaCO:j)
4,400 mg/L
TABLE 5-22. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS
PLANT E, NOVEMBER 3, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
3.1
3,000 [jmhos/cm
180 mg/L
3,400 mg/L
1,600 ing/1 (CaCO;t)
19 mg/l
2,900 mg/L
TABLE 5-23. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT E, NOVEMBER 27, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.6
3,000 umhos/cm
38 mg/L
3,100 mg/L
1,300 mg/L (CaC03)
120 mg/L
4,000 mg/L
TABLE 5-24. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS
PLANT E, DECEMBER 2, 1976
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Ac i d i ty
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
4,500 umhos/cm
130 mg/L
5,000 mg/L
2,100 mg/L (CaC03)
44 mg/L
3,300 mg/L
5-10
-------
TABLE 5-25. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT E, DECEMBER 16, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.6
3,400 (jmhos/cm
260 mg/L
3,900 mg/L
1,300 mg/L (CaC03)
260 mg/L
2,500 mg/L
TABLE 5-26. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT E, DECEMBER 22, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Ac i d i ty
Cl
Assigned
concentration
2.5
3,000 umhos/cm
270 mg/L
2,900 mg/L
860 mg/L (CaCO.-O
170 mg/L
2,100 mg/L
TABLE 5-27. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT E, DECEMBER 28, 1976
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.6
3,100 umhos/cm
250 mg/L
3,100 mg/L
1,000 mg/L (CaC03)
170 mg/L
1,900 mg/L
TABLE 5-28. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT E, MARCH 2, 1977
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.5
3,300 umhos/cm
680 mg/L
3,300 mg/L
920 mg/L (CaC03)
190 mg/L
2,200 mg/L
5-11
-------
TABLE 5-29. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT E, MARCH 7, 1977
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Assigned
concentration
2.6
2,700 umhos/cm
280 mg/L
2,300 mg/L
700 mg/L (CaC03)
120 mg/L
1,800 mg/L
TABLE 5-30. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS
PLANT E, MARCH 14, 1977
Parameter
pH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.5
2,600 umhos/cm
460 mg/L
270 mg/L
1,200 mg/L (CaC03)
15 mg/L
1,900 mg/L
TABLE 5-31. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT E, APRIL 6, 1977
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
solids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.4
6,400 umhos/cm
72 mg/L
8,200 mg/L
2,500 mg/L (CaC03)
660 mg/L
6,200 mg/L
TABLE 5-32. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS
PLANT E, APRIL 26, 1977
Parameter
PH
Cond.
Suspended
sol ids
Dissolved
solids
Acidity
Cl
S04
Assigned
concentration
2.3
2,200 umhos/cm
420 mg/L
5,100 mg/L
4,800 mg/L (CaCOa)
340 mg/L
4,100 mg/L
5-12
-------
TABLE 5-33. FIELD WATER ANALYSIS,
PLANT E, JUNE 21, 1977
Assigned
Parameter concentration
pH 2.4
Cond. 6,000 jjmhos/cm
Suspended
solids 340 mg/L
Dissolved
solids 6,300 mg/L
Acidity 1,500 mg/L (CaCO:1)
Cl 470 mg/L
S04 3,700 mg/L
5-13
-------
ADDITIONAL DATA
b-14
-------
TABLE C-l. WATER qaUJTY fltl*—
Dat-
y- 9-7';
5-26-7fc
«- 9-7r
f-17-76
6-22-76
7. 1.76
-- 7-76
7-29-76
9-Z7-76
5- 1-76
a- 8-76
5-29-76
iO- 6-7£
10-13-76
10-20-76
10-27-76
Dkte
3- 9-76
»- 7-76
k-13-76
-29-76
5- 5-76
5-1U-76
5-26-76
6- 9-76
6-17-7S
6-22-76
7. 1.76
T. 7.76
7-29-76
3-27-76
3_ l»Tt
J- 8-76
9-29-76
10- 6-76
10-13-76
10-20-76
10-27-76
F-
510
30C
180:
73C
58C
760
620
1700
U7C
1800
1400
160C
79C
1000
750
780
1UOC
58C
Pt
(=3 '1 '
<0.31
< T.01
<0.0i
11
(•g.'i'.
1."
3';
c.l
£.2
2!;
3-?
2 . "^
3.?
l.b
t.o
i.j
-.5
2.2
2.3
i.e
1.6
2.1.
!.!»
Be
(BK/L)
_
.
0 "*?
0.06
0.05
c.%
0.03
O.C3
0.0k
0.03
o.ou
0.06
0.06
0.07
0.03
3.0k
0.0;
0.3'
o.cu
0.03
c.
19C
UOC
31
ZK
23C
320
330
320
37C
260
280
490
"30
30C
30C
350
320
360
2UO
Sb
(•a't)
^
.
< 0.1
< 0.1
< 0.1
< ".1
o!e
1.1
1.8
1. '-*
1.1
0.1
0.5
".6
o!6
0.7
0.5
0.7
0.7
0.5
V".
320
270
22C
z\~
350
95
38C
J^-C
^~
320
2"
I5C
f.:
?=c
^infkll
(l»;
2.52
0.06
1.52
l.k?
2.16
0.25
6.7T
=.^6
^.%
-ise
.
' ."S
5-5-
2.13
j.i»5
7.*J
3. ^
-------
Dttc
11- 3-76
11-27-76
12- 2-76
12-16-76
12-22-7*
12-28--*
3- 2-77
3- 7-77
3-1^77
U 6-77
6-21-77
Okte
11- 3-76
U-2--74
li- 2-76
12-16-7*
12-25-76
12- _-7.
3- 2-77
T_ *T» T*?
3-1—77
** "^
!i-26-T
o_2i--rT
F« fe
"•-: 3-2
3-S 2.5
-a: i:.:
39C S."7
3?c 5!-:
BC-C 3.2
?3 1.8
f: 2.3
ijA/" £.
3i: ;.o
^ Hg
«2 " ^"*g L^
<:.?: 3.0031
-------
TABLE 4. CORRELATION MATRIX—PLANT E
pH
Acid.
Cond.
Cl
SO$
D.Sol
S.Sol
Fe
Hn
S102
Cu
Zn
Cr
Al
Ni
Ca
MR
Pb
Hg
Ba
As
Cd
Se
Tl
Be
Sb
RF1
RF4
PH
1.00
-.375
-.251
-.592
-.303
-.332
-.305
.010
-.248
-.273
.194
-.113
.581
-.013
-.120
-.562
-.395
0.00
.157
-.286
.645
.087
-.065
0.00
-.197
-.167
-.225
.086
Acid.
1.00
.039
.398
.605
.510
-.028
.628
.436
.136
.187
.435
-.078
.725
.740
.819
.433
0.00
-.010
.237
-.153
-.156
-.221
0.00
-.109
.678
.141
-.302
Cond.
1.00
.717
.651
.807
-.319
.415
.766
-.070
.360
.757
.177
-.399
.368
.285
.846
-0.00
-.141
.866
-.432
0.00
-.304
0.00
.171
.377
.240
-.084
Cl
1.00
.738
.840
-.096
.399
.562
.481
-.053
.512
-.021
-.065
.309
.630
.856
0.00
-.134
.842
-.403
-.254
-.362
0.00
.281
.647
.255
.015
804
1.00
.843
-.475
.722
.760
.273
.391
.666
-.025
.091
.629
.541
.733
0.00
.176
.791
-.329
-.289
-.415
0.00
.126
.897
.474
-.383
O.Sol
1.00
-.341
.655
.810
.040
.351
.743
.150
.101
.507
.676
.939
-0.00
.038
.755
-.443
-.024
-.640
0.00
.165
.714
.155
-.071
S.Sol
1.00
-.340
-.405
-.020
-.609
-.283
-.143
.211
-.322
.151
-.228
0.00
-.527
-.364
.323
-.255
.307
0.00
-.198
-.355
-.393
.335
Fe
1.00
.715
.122
.570
.552
.227
.380
.717
.535
.603
-0.00
.158
.508
.003
.113
-.333
0.00
.099
.644
-.145
-.013
Hn
1.00
-.220
.668
.651
-.049
-.043
.628
.390
.763
0.00
-.140
.746
-.504
.186
-.300
0.00
.146
.466
.226
-.224
Si02
1.00
-.378
-.184
-.014
.038
.006
.186
.122
0.00
.163
.296
.213
-.406
.189
0.00
.160
.485
.131
.151
Cu
1.00
.445
.230
.143
.513
.0'6
.359
0.00
.209
.210
-.376
.420
-.171
0.00
-.076
.095
.054
-.044
Zn
1.00
.441
.341
.750
.549
.784
0.00
-.081
.514
-.136
-.136
-.278
0.00
-.168
.629
.221
-.320
Cr
1.00
.365
.218
.053
.279
0.00
-.022
-.164
.707
-.050
-.218
0.00
-.226
-.038
-.423
.455
Al
1.00
.485
.692
.148
0.00
.054
-.370
.249
-.053
-.129
0.00
-.472
.211
-.290
.140
-------
TABLE
Ni
Ca
Mp
Pb
HR
Ba
As
Cd
Se
Ti
Be
Sb
RPl
RP4
4 (continued)
HI
1.00
.532
.533
0.00
-.141
.367
-.047
-.036
.0*5
0.00
-.105
.666
.209
-.418
Ca
1.00
.680
0.00
.035
.194
-.244
-.058
-.432
0.00
-.055
.498
-.154
.054
Mg
1.00
0.00
-.112
.738
-.456
.018
-.464
0.00
.137
.527
.030
.138
Pb
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hg
1.00
-.211
-.157
.200
-.513
0.00
.142
.047
-.053
-.018
Ba
1.00
-.301
-.221
-.151
0.00
.364
.669
.458
-.253
As
1.00
-.514
.275
0.00
-.310
.105
-.379
.284
Cd
1.00
-.187
0.00
.120
-.571
-.510
.331
Se
1.00
0.00
-.188
-.348
.200
-.261
Ti Be Sb RF1 RH
1.00
0.00 1.00
0.00 .038 1.00
0.00 -.078 .526 1.00
0.00 .037 -.529 -.781 1.00
00
-------
TABLE 5. CORRELATION MATRIX—PLANT J
CJl
(-•
VC
oil
Acid.
Cond.
Cl
S04
D.Sol
S.Sol
Fc
Mn
S102
Cu
Cr
Al
Ni
Ca
Kg
Pb
Hg
Ba
As
Cd
Se
Tl
Be
Sb
RF1
RP2
RP3
RF4
TSLS
PH
1.00
-.229
-.053
-1.00
-.029
-.114
.250
-.178
-.089
-.023
-.116
-.145
-.342
-.119
-.071
.157
.113
0.00
.258
-.037
.211
0.00
.086
0.00
-.130
-.050
.114
.138
-.108
-.175
-.073
Acid.
1.00
.698
-1.00
.839
.828
-.462
.784
.717
.616
.539
.664
-.279
.701
.832
.624
.839
-0.00
-.204
.643
-.287
0.00
-.203
0.00
.688
.295
.069
-.483
.413
-.290
.128
Cond. Cl
1.00
0.00 1.00
.781 -1.00
.895 -1.00
-.097 -1.00
.775 -1.00
.794 -1.00
.754 -1.00
.581 -1.00
.761 -1.00
-.502 1.00
.653 -1.00
.831 -1.00
.409 -1.00
.700 0.00
-0.00 0.00
-.023 0.00
.613 0.00
-.106 0.00
0.00 0.00
-.415 -1.00
0.00 0.00
.803 0.00
.138 0.00
-.134 -1.00
-.309 0.00
.102 0.00
-.510 1.00
.043 -1.00
S04
1.00-
.878
-.088
.867
.767
.687
.764
.621
-.398
.633
.892
.633
.857
-0.00
-.178
.532
.188
0.00
-.317
0.00
.623
.400
.013
-.372
.281
-.352
.352
D.Sol
1.00
-.091
.840
.834
.738
.583
.750
-.351
.755
.934
.549
.762
-0.00
-.093
.679
-.092
0.00
-.274
0.00
.755
.314
-.085
-.394
.257
-.372
.240
S.Sol
1.00
-.220
-.008
.073
.133
-.499
-.042
-.026
-.046
.144
-.350
-0.00
-.022
-.226
.638
0.00
.118
0.00
-.390
.306
.240
.325
-.117
-.141
-.018
Fe
1.00
.677
.503
.599
.602
-.502
.690
.809
.474
.714
0.00
-.107
.488
-.142
0.00
-.304
0.00
.814
-.071
-.066
-.537
.391
-.323
.083
Mn
1.00
.754
.642
.526
-.526
.764
.870
.515
.709
0.00
0.00
.384
.011
0.00
-.001
0.00
.621
.306
-.053
-.615
.475
-.526
.498
sto2
1.00
.698
.453
-.522
.640
.757
.240
.634
-0.00
-.186
.363
.176
0.00
-.141
0.00
.482
.514
-.216
-.338
.119
-.308
.234
Cu
1.00
.457
-.551
.522
.766
.396
.566
0.00
-.133
.183
.218
0.00
-.085
0.00
.478
.390
-.051
-.285
.244
-.363
.341
Zn
1.00
-.584
.470
.760
.519
.578
-0.00
-.162
.558
-.298
0.00
-.063
0.00
.501
.337
.189
-.048
.113
-.301
.055
Cr
1.00
-.296
-.565
-.188
.565
0.00
-.049
-.134
.106
0.00
-.205
0.00
-.631
.136
.069
.422
-.306
.413
-.292
Al
1.00
.770
.352
.459
-0.00
-.028
.574
-.042
0.00
-.086
0.00
.431
.294
.021
-.517
.434
-.447
.135
Ni
1.00
.610
.800
0.00
-.139
.648
-.102
0.00
-.109
0.00
.721
.381
-.098
-.394
.259
-.408
.345
Ca
1.00
.386
-0.00
-.186
.303
-.017
0.00
0.138
0.00
.176
.368
.205
-.141
.191
-.289
.212
-------
TABLE 5 (contInued)
171
I
ro
o
Mg
Pb
Hg
Ba
As
Cd
Sc
Ti
Be
Sb
RF1
RF2
RF3
RF4
TSLS
Mg
1.00
-0.00
-.087
.516
-.282
0.00
.001
0.00
.705
.202
-.078
-.312
.182
-.334
.281
Ph
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.3*
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Hg
1.00
-.242
.047
0.00
-.036
0.00
-.002
-.282
-.035
-.072
.057
-.090
.021
Ba
1.00
-.304
0.00
.128
0.00
.369
.322
-.226
-.109
-.056
.202
.215
As
1.00
0.00
-.341
0.00
-.391
.293
.342
.003
.192
-.271
.048
Cd
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-0.00
0.00
Se
1.00
0.00
-.269
.434
-.021
.700
-.030
-.120
.455
Ti
1.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Be
1.00
-.284
-.451
-.516
.187
-.166
.211
Sb
1.00
.236
.230
-.091
.014
.190
J»F1 RF2
1.00
.057 1.00
.528 -.818
-.327 .181
-.227 -.402
RF3 RF4 TSLS
1.00
-.346 1.00
.262 -.205 1.00
-------
TABLE 6. CORRELATION MATRIX - BOTH PLANTS
(PLANT E AND PLANT J)
pH Acid. Cond. Cl S04 D.Sol S.Sol Fe Mn Si°2 Cu Zn Cr Al Nl Ca
pH 1.00
Acid. .038 1.00
Good. .042 .524 1.00
Cl -.«« .394 .752 1.00
S04 .122 .841 .726 .746 1.00
D.Sol .130 .827 .810 .833 .898 1.00
S.Sol .220 -.305 -.042 -.124 -.074 -.021 1.00
Fe .179 .814 .642 .292 .868 .866 -.099 1.00
Mn .354 .714 .603 -.064 .745 .816 .101 .792 1.00
S102 .290 .666 .662 -.040 .719 .786 .148 .687 .864 1.00
Cu .351 .630 .526 -.315 .729 .694 .164 .760 .883 .837 1.00
Zn .177 .724 .697 .380 .708 .816 .028 .733 .717 .661 .681 1.00
Cr .005 -.178 -.132 -.078 -.232 -.160 -.046 -.259 -.199 -.215 -.188 -.248 1.00
Al .290 .731 .584 -.305 .672 .788 .C95 .797 .899 .823 .807 .693 -.069 1.00
Ni .337 .796 .603 -.249 .814 .874 .076 .865 .943 .873 .904 .829 -.248 .904 1.00
Ca -.167 .486 .282 .655 .409 .3fU .093 .751 .136 .095 .073 .294 -.063 .177 .188 1.00
Mg .334 .E45 .656 .824 .8f6 .846 -.165 .831 .831 .794 .772 .751 -.284 .728 .379 .218
Pb 0.00 -0.00 -0.00 0.00 -0.00 -0.00 -0.00 0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00 -0.00 0.00 -0.00
Hg -.271 -.375 -.305 .101 -.310 -.389 -.171 -.444 -.642 -.539 -.606 -.464 -.095 -.577 -0.606 .046
Ba -.027 .531 ,69fi .842 .610 .633 -.188 .441 .343 .329 .227 .478 -.139 .364 .433 .242
As .408 .041 .241 -.286 .374 .248 .586 .236 .479 .512 .550 .130 .161 .424 .385 -.011
Cd -.189 -.257 -.152 -.135 -.291 -.242 -.110 -.255 -.366 -.365 -.312 -.290 -.040 -.383 -.360 -.001
Se .197 -.031 -.200 -.330 -.112 -.074 .159 -.056 .250 .123 .193 .101 -.154 .174 .170 -.155
Tl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Be .309 .700 .610 .281 .686 .789 -.107 .861 .861 .767 .803 .693 -.251 .770 .883 .019
Sb .164 .493 .442 .647 .599 .535 .317 .270 .553 .674 .579 .538 .091 .537 .584 .255
RF1 -.309 .032 -.008 .369 .069 -.079 .131 -.128 -.109 -.194 -.119 .070 -.134 -.099 -.142 .039
RF2 .138 -.483 -.309 0.00 -.372 -.394 .325 -.537 -.615 -.338 -.285 -.048 .422 -.517 -.394 -.141
RF3 -.108 .413 .102 0.00 .281 .257 -.117 .391 .475 .119 .244 .113 -.306 .434 .259 .198
RF4 -.068 -.169 -.264 -.238 -.212 -.203 -.110 -.172 -.149 -.110 -.087 -.145 .337 -.164 -.138 -.177
TSLS -.073 .128 .043 -1.00 .352 .240 -.018 .083 .498 .234 .341 .055 -.292 .135 .345 .212
-------
TABLE16 (continued)
?Ig
Pb
Hg
Ba
As
Cd
Se
Ti
Re
Sb
RP1
RP2
RF3
RP4
TSLS
MR Pb
1.00
-0.00 1.00
-.508 0.00
.450 0.00
.255 0.00
-.293 0.00
.222 0.00
0.00 0.00
.834 -0.00
.459 -0.00
-.097 0.00
-.312 0.00
. 182 0. 00
-.146 0.00
.281 0.00
HR
1.00
-.230
-.408
.432
-.284
0.00
-.574
.422
.107
-.072
.058
-.132
.021
Ba
1.00
-.132
-.194
.109
0.00
.324
.361
.028
-.109
-.056
.163
.215
As
1.00
-.244
-.085
0.00
.2*1
.462
.101
.003
.192
-.111
.048
Cd
1.00
-.136
0.00
-.310
-.344
-.184
0.00
0.00
-.073
0.00
Se
1.00
0.00
.163
.543
-.079
.200
-.030
-.067
.455
Ti
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Re
1.00
.198
-.334
-.516
.187
.042
.211
Sb
1.00
.202
.230
-.091
.089
.190
RP1
1.00
.057
.528
..287
-.227
RF2
1.00
-.818
.181
-.402
RF3
1.00
-.346
.262
RF4 TSLS
1.00
-.205 1.00
r\j
INS
-------
TABLE 7. CORRELATIONS WITH rVALUES >0.71
Parameter
pH
Acidity
Conductivity
Cl
304
TDS
TSS
Fe
Mn
Si02
Cu
Zn
Cr
Al
Ni
Ca
Mg
Pb
Hg
Ba
As
Cd
Sc
Tl
Be
RF1
RF2
TSLS
RF3
RF4
Plant J
Q
6
8
-
8
11
0
7
8
A
2
2
0
4
12
0
7
—
0
0
0
-
0
-
5
0
0
0
0
0
Plant E
0
3
6
5
6
' 7
0
3
6
0
0
4
1
1
3
1
7
_
0
6
1
0
0
_
0
0
_
_
^ ,
0
&oth plants
0
8
3
_
11
12
0
10
12
8
8
7
1
10
11
0
12
0
1
0
—
0
_
8
0
-------
TABLE 9. ACID-BASE BALANCE
I
ro
Sample
Ho.
J776
J876
J1076
E1076
E1176
E1276
E177
E277
Laboratory
potential acidity
(ton/CaC03/1000 ton)
15.5
14.0
14.5
43.5
43.5
34.5
35.5
31.0
Calculated
potential acidity
(ton/CaC03/1000 ton)
45.5
47.5
49.5
102.5
103.5
112.0
108.0
101.5
Laboratory
neutralization potential
(ton CaO>3/100Q ton)
<0.3
<0.3
<0.3
7.6
0.8
7.6
7.3
1.1
Laboratory
excess acidity*
(ton CaCOj/lOOO tao)
r
15.2
13.7
14.2
35.9
42.7
26.9
28.2
29.9
Calculated
excess acidity**
(ton/CaCO3/100 ton)
45.2
47.2
49.2
94.9
102.7
104.4
100.7
100.4
•Laboratory potential acidity ttlnus laboratory neutralization potential.
**Calculated potential acidity minus laboratory neutralization potential.
-------
TABLE 10. GOAL ANALYSIS—PLANTS J AND E
in
IVJ
en
Approximate analysis
Z total Moisture
Dry basis
Z volatile Matter
Z ash
Z fixed carbon
Z total sulfur
Bto/lb
As received
Dry
AAMF
Fora of S (dry)
Z sulfate
Z pyritic
Z organic
Z total
Particle size As
J50A
2.0
37.1
13.5
49.4
1.9
12,885
13.117
15.159
0.04
0.82
1.02
1.88
received
J50B
2.0
37.4
13.3
49.3
1.7
12.879
13.160
15.173
0.04
0.69
0.96
1.69
-18/4-40
Plant J
J776
3.0
33.0
16.6
50.4
2.11
12.048
14.446
0.46
0.69
0.96
2.11
-1B/+40
Plant E
J876
2.8
33.4
15.6
51.0
2.04
12,183
14.441
0.32
0.76
0.96
2.04
-18/440
J1076
2.
33.
15.
51.
2.
12,
14.
0.
0.
0.
2.
8
2
6
2
12
252
523
33
81
93
12
-18/4-40
E1076
3.2
36.8
15.1
48.1
4.09
12,293
14.477
0.27
2.13
1.69
4.09
-18/+40
Ell 76
3.2
37.3
14.8
47.9
4.15
12,414
14.566
0.28
2.21
1.66
4.15
-18/4-40
E1276
3.1
36.7
16.6
46.7
4.51
12,082
14.489
0.22
2.54
1.75
4.51
-18/4-40
E177
3.4
37.1
15.7
47.2
4.27
12,210
14,490
0.24
2.39
1.64
4.27
-18/4-40
E277
4.0
37.6
14.6
47.8
4.10
12,351
14,460
0.32
2.06
1.72
4.10
-18/-KI
-------
TABLE 11. COAL ANALYSIS - PLANT J
Sample Number
Analysis of Ash (%)
Si02
A1203
Fe203
CaO
MgO
S03
Na20
K20
Ti02
Analysis of Ash (rag/l)
Mn
Pb
Cu
J50A
51.6
27.9
11.7
1.8
l.l
1.4
0.3
2.5
1.2
120
92
213
J50B
52. A
28.2
10.6
1.6
1.0
1.7
0.3
2.5
1.2
110
101
269
5-26
-------
TABLE 12. RESULTS OF SHAKER TESTS—PLANTS J A!fB E
Ul
I
ro
PLA.YI .!
t)H
Fe
ta
TDS
so4
SI
X
3
Ranee
X
X
a
Ranse
S
X
a
Range
M
if
a
Range
N
X
a
Range
H
X
a
Range
M
J776
2.64
0.01
2.62-2.66
6
250
39.5C
?1 0-310
6
1.71
0.17
1.5-2.0
6
1533
57.74
1500-1600
3
1100
0.01
1100-1100
3
0.70
0.09
0.62-0.87
6
.1870
2.7S
0.02
2.73-2.77
6
183
19.66
160-210
6
1.32
0.12
1.2-1.5
6
1067
57.74
1000-1100
3
813
23.09
300-840
3
0.67
0.13
0.55-0.83
6
J1076
2. '3
0.12
2.70-2.75
6
170
30.93
140-?20
A
1.37
O.Oa
1.3-1.5
6
1033
57.74
1000-1100
3
813
23.09
600-640
3
0.69
0.14
0.55-0.83
5
Total
2.70
0.05
2.62-2.77
18
201
46.39
140-310
14
1.46
0.21
1.2-2.0
IB
1211
247.2
1000-1600
9
909
144.3
800-1100
9
0.69
0.11
0.55-0.37
IS
E1076
7.12
0.4£
6.47-7.90
6
0.23
0.19
<.OS-.46
6
1.13
0.19
0.83-1.2
6
1067
57.74
1000-1100
3
700
45.83
650-740
3
0.33
0.16
0.17-0.50
6
E1176
6.46
0.26
*J.10-6.B2
6
0.30
0.22
<.05-.53
6
1.22
0.36
0.87-1.6
6
1200
100
1100-1300
3
790
26.46
770-820
3
0.41
0.20
0.20-0.65
6
PLANT E
El 286
6.83
0.10
6.70-6.94
6
0.21
0.08
0.07-3.30
6
1.03
0.26
0.73-1.3
6
1033
57.74
1000-1130
3
723
15.28
710-740
3
0.27
0.11
0.17-0.44
6
E177
6.49
0.20
6.23-6.66
6
0.17
0.19
<.OS-.55
6
1.23
0.29
0.95-1.5
6
1033
57.74
1000-1100
3
717
25.17
690-740
3
0.29
o.oa
0.22-0.42
6
E277
5.94
0.35
5.51-6.38
6
0.44
0.24
0.25-0.92
6
1.95
0.29
1.6-2.3
6
1300
100
1200-1400
3
850
266.3
570-1100
3
3.46
0.12
0.37-0.69
6
Total
6.57
0.49
5.51-7.9-5
30
0.27
0.20
'.05-.?:
30
1.2S
0.44
0.78-2.3
30
1127
128.0
1CXW-1400
15 .
756
iia.4
570-1100
15
0.35
3.15
0.17-0.6?
30
-------
TABLE 13. CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF COAL PILE
DRAINAGE USED FOR TREATMENT STUDY
Concentration (mg/L)
Constituent Total Dissolved
Acidity, as CaC03 9,100
Total dissolved solids 19,000
Total suspended solids 6
Iron 3,000 3,000
Manganese 46 44
Zinc 12 12
Nickel 4.4 4.4
Copper 1.6 1.3
Arsenic 0.28 0.28
Selenium <0.001 <0.001
Chromium <0.005 <0.005
Mercury <0.002 <0.0002
5-28
-------
TABLE B-2. RAINTALL-RUNOFF DATA - PLANT J
Test period
(1977)
03/30-04/03
04/12-04/15
04/22-04/25
05/01-05/03
05/07-05/08
05/11-05/19
05/28-06/01
06/02-06/05
06/11-06/21
06/25-06/30
07/02-07/06
07/08-07/17
07/22-07/22
07/26-08/08
08/15-08/18
08/26-08/28
08/31-09/06
09/20-09/27
09/29-10/10
10/12-10/15
10/17-10/25
10/30-11/11
Rainfall
(in)
2.65
0.12
0.95
1.03
0.53
5.05
3.35
2.24
2.03
1.87
1.6
0.85
0.1
0.55
0.45
0.30
1.05
2.95
1.1
0.05
3.77
0.9
Pumping time
(h)
71.5
13.0
6.5
14.0
5.5
114.5
96.75
38.0
41.5
25.75
56.75
22.0
15.75
13.25
12.75
6.5
11.75
78.0
14.25
1.0
72.75
17.75
5-29
-------
TABLE B-3. WEIR READINGS FOR DETERMINATION OF PUMPING RATE
Date
03-11-77
03-12-77
03-13-77
03-14-77
03-20-77
03-28-77
03-30-77
03-31-77
04-03-77
04-06-77
04-08-77
04-16-77
04-19-77
04-23-77
04-24-77
04-25-77
04-26-77
05-01-77
05-03-77
05-21-77
05-23-77
05-24-77
06-14-77
06-20-77
06-20-77
06-21-77
06-21-77
06-21-77
06-23-77
06-24-77
06-27-77
X
s
H
0.34
0.33
0.35
0.38
0.38
0.375
0.395
0.37
0.31
0.33
0.33
0.32
0.35
0.32
0.34
0.31
0.34
0.36
0.36
0.32
0.32
0.31
0.30
0.29
0.21
0.17
0.22
0.15
0.28
0.20
0.29
0.315
0.085
Flow
(cfs)
1.94
1.85
2.02
2.28
2.28
2.225
2.37
2.19
1.69
1.85
1.85
1.77
2.02
1.77
1.94
1.69
1.94
2.11
2.11
1.77
1.77
1.69
1.61
1.53
0.948
0.692
1.02
0.575
1.45
0.881
1.53
1.72
0.47
Flow
(gal/min)
870.67
830.28
906.58
1,023.26
1,023.26
998.58
1,063.66
982.87
758.47
830.28
830.28
794.38
906.58
794.38
870.67
758.47
870.67
946.97
946.97
794.00
794.00
758.00
723.40
686.00
425.00
311.00
458.00
258.00
651.00
395.00
687.00
771.00
208.2
b-30
-------
Figure 6. Physlcoehenical data for plants J and E.
100000 c - —
1
nog
t
I »
I
0.01
0.001
KMOOO
K5000
WOO
1
JlOOOl
Jj
(J) (It
o -o
I
I
I
00
ADD
COW _
•nil
Ui-tai
0000
!«.
i
f i
OOI
0001
1
PUkMT
I J
O O •
II-
• TONCHM) OCVMTKM
I ) -MHMMtTWOWOCCVUTION
5-31
-------
en
i
cu
fvs
ou
2B
1"
I
12-4
Z2
*n
PH
\ /X Acidity
\ / <
\ff \
\
/
~ /\ /^
\
,'-' -
I ^"
» ^*-'
_
I9AI
1250
3°
1000 I
8
"i
x» 1
y
250
0
8OOO
-.„ „ 6000-
>- 4000
2000
50
no BO
TIME
(MINI
200 250
*OO
500
J 200
DO
MonganiM
lent
pt i i i
I . . .A • ...IQ
6.0
4.0
1
I
SO
100
BO
TIC
(MM)
200 250
8000
Cond.
TOS
6000
H4000 -
2000
50
00
eo
TIME
(HIM)
200 250
6000
4000
2000
TSS
$04
3OOO
2OOO
n
in
1000
50
eo
TME
MM)
200 250
Figure 7. Results of discrete «tor» analysis.
-------
I t 1 « > M
i
3 «
M 4i n
i
OJ
OJ
J—I i I—I I I
i t 14 > M <• n
• at MO
t s 4 f
I t * 4 S 14 41 n
nt (*)
• a MO
Figure 8. Results of time to equilibriua analyses.
-------
6.0
In 4.0
1
1
x 20
20
40
60
80
100
TIME
(min)
Figure 9. Coal pH.
5-34
-------
in
OJ
in
HO
DO
90
80
TO
60
90-
40-
O
o-
TOO
800
800
I
300
too
no
4.0
u-
30
"
zo-
LO-
0
O
1
t * *
to
JO 40 SO •• •
' 16
1 1.4 •
1 12 •
1U> •
0*
OM-
tt4 •
OLX-
' t *
30 40
TO
«O
IS
s.o-
JC*
5"*
* «-«i
uo
OB
0
' i '
90
00
TO
*CoolSin-40
-e/*4o I
Figure 10. Results of varying coal to elute
ratio and coal size.
K>2Oa0409060T08O
-------
3.0 p
20
1.0
ISOO
1 1000
900
100 200 300 400 BOO
100 200
300 400 900
Md*d
3OO
E ZOO
100
4000
3000
2000
1000
100 200
X)0 400 SOb
0 100 200 300 400 500
30
S 20
.0
3000
2000
1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 90 «O 70
10 2.0
3.0 40 S-0
pH Inillol
(.0 70
300
200
100
4000
- 3000
2000
o
in
•
3.0
*
4.0
30
PH initial
70
Figure 11. Result* of varying clute pH tad hardneii.
5-36
-------
STUDY NUMBER 6
DATA
SOURCE:
LEVEL 1 ASSESSMENT OF
LIMESTONE SCRUBBING WITH
ADIPIC ACID ADDITION
DATA
STATUS:
Draft, April 30, 1979
AUTHORS:
CONTRACTOR:
James E. Howes, Jr., Rachael Barbour,
Doyle F. Kohler, and Alf Bjorseth
Battelle-Columbus Laboratories
505 King Avenue
Columbus, Ohio 43201
PROJECT
OFFICER:
John E. Williams
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
6-1
-------
LEVEL 1 ASSESSMENT OF LIMESTONE SCRUBBING
WITH ADIPIC ACID ADDITION
This study was conducted January 29, 1979, through February 2, 1979, at
the EPA Alkali Wet Scrubber Test Facility at the Shawnee Steam Plant, a
coal-fired power plant near Paducah, Kentucky. The purposes of the study
were (1) to evaluate the ability of adipic acid, at about 1,600 ppm in a
limestone-water slurry, to enhance the removal of S02 from effluent gases
(as compared to a limestone-water slurry without adipic acid) and (2) to
determine if adipic acid and its reaction products in the effluent gas might
have caused environmental detriment. Samples, as shown by the circled
numbers, were taken from a venturi/spray tower system, shown in Figure 6-1,
and from a turbulent contact absorber (TCA) system, shown in F igure 6-2.
Sampling procedures followed the Level 1 Procedures Manual1, and the
samples were obtained and analyzed as shown in Table 6-1.
Table 6-1. Sample Analysis
Control device
Venturi/spray
tower system
TCA system
1.
2.
3.
4.
1.
2.
Sample
Scrubber/spray
tower gas
Forced-oxidation
tank vent emissions
Solids cake from
vacuum filter
Spray tower slurry
feed
Scrubber stack gas
Solids cake from
centrifuge
On-
site
GC
V
V
>/
SASS,
partic-
ulates
V
V
V
Level 1
organic
V
V
V
V
V
V
Level
1
inor-
ganic
V
V
V
V
V
/
Bio-
assay
V
V
V
V
V
V
6-2
-------
en
i
to
SCRUBBER
EfFLUENT
HOLD
TANK
FORCED
OXIDATION
TANK
— Gas Stream
— Liquor Stream
5tIUIKC?Gf.O"
Sampling Points
1. Flue gas from scrubber
2. Oxidation tank vent
3. Filter'cake
A. Spray tower slurry
Figure 6-1. Process flow diagram for venturi/spray tower system.
-------
y^r>
"^> aia on.'
RUtGAS
«*—_
ICA
SCRUBBER
T
FIRST
HOLD
TANK
SECOND
HOLD
TANK
•-•«•-£?•
I. D. FAN
A A /"
• ~" T
:ViV
** • • •
, •
.*.*.•.•
J
Gas Stream
Liquor Stream
I
STACK
Sampling Points
1. Flue gas from scrubber
2. Centrifuge cake
Figure 6-2. Process flow diagram for TCA system.
-------
Onsite gas chromatography for C02, CO, 02, N2, sulfur compounds, and
hydrocarbons (bp <100° C) was performed according to Level 1 procedures. It
was found that Level 1 procedures for S02 caused problems due to the reaction
of S02 with H20 which condensed in the glass sampling bulbs. Therefore, S02
was measured by continuous monitors operated by the power plant. S02 and
another unidentified volatile sulfur compound (with a relative retention
time of 0.53 relative to S02 on a 36 ft x 1/8 in. polyphenylether/H3P04
column) were detected in all three gaseous samples. The concentration of
the unidentified sulfur compound was estimated at:
Sample mg S/m3
Venturi scrubber/spray tower gas 7.2
Forced-oxidation tank vent emissions 9
TCA scrubber stack gas 9.4
There was no CO detected in any samples. Analytical results for C02, 02,
S02, and hydrocarbons are presented in the data tables that follow this
written summary.
SASS samples were also taken of the three gaseous streams. Procedures
for SASS sampling were as specified in the Level 1 Manual except that hyper-
isokinetic sampling rate was employed in sampling the oxidation tank vent
because the required size of the SASS probe nozzle was not available; this
should not have adversely affected test results because this emission did
not contain appreciable amounts of particulates.
SASS samples were analyzed by Level 1 procedures except that LC frac-
tionation was not performed on the 10 ±3 pm particulates in the venturi and
TCA samples and on the filter in the oxidation tank vent sample. The Level 1
procedure specifies that LC fractionation does not need to be performed if
the total particulate catch is less than 0.5 mg/30 m3. Corrected to 30 m3,
particulate catches for the three gaseous samples were:
Venturi scrubber/spray tower gas 477 mg/30 m3
Forced-oxidation tank vent emissions 10 mg/30 m3
TCA scrubber stack gas 410 mg/30 m3
(It appears that a cutoff of 0.5 g rather than 0.5 mg may have been used
here.)
6-5
-------
It is of interest, relative to the goals of the study, that IR analysis
of the venturi effluent sample indicated adipic acid, but the presence of
adipic acid was not confirmed by LRMS. Several suspect contaminants were
identified by IR in this sample: silicones and phthalates, possibly from
sampling or process equipment; polychlorotrifluoroethylene, possibly from
Viton gaskets in the SASS train; and diethylene glycol, which is listed as
an antifreeze solution for sprinkler systems in the Merck Index*.
No fugitive emissions samples were taken in this study. Level I grab
techniques were used to obtain samples of the venturi spray tower slurry,
the venturi filter cake, and the TCA centrifuge cake.
The following samples were taken for bioassay:
Venturi Scrubber System
1. 350 mg of SASS particulates from stack gas test
2. 2 ml of SASS XAD-2 extract from stack gas test
3. 2 ml of SASS XAD-2 extract from forced-oxidation tank vent test
4. 500 g of venturi filter cake
5. 1 L of venturi spray tower slurry
A SASS particulate sample was not obtained from the oxidation tank vent
emissions.
TCA Scrubber System
1. 350 mg of SASS particulates from stack gas test
2. 2 mL of SASS XAD-2 extract from stack gas test
3. 500 g TCA centrifuge cake
Level 1 sample handling procedures were followed, according to the report,
but due to difficulty with the solvent exchange procedure into DMSO, the
XAD-2 extracts are estimated to contain about 10 percent methylene chloride,
which could affect bioassay results. No bioassay results were presented in
this draft report.
6-6
-------
LEVEL 1
6-7
-------
TABLE 6-2. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPEC1ROSCOPY
SASS FILTER PARTICULATES--OXIDATION TANK VEN1
(ug/m3*)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
<0.0196
<0.0392
<-0.0196
0.0977
<0.131
<0.654
<0.0196
<0.0654
-0.0327
• 0.0654
<0.0327
<0.0654
<0.0491
<0.0491
< 0.0491
<0.0491
<0.0164
<0.0491
<0.0164
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.0491
<0.0164
<0.0491
<0.0229
<0.0491
0.0323
<0.0131
0.0122
0.00981
t
0.00147
t
<0.0327
t
0.0733
0.00491
0.147
<0. 00589
<0.0981
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.0327
<0.196
0.0491
0.00647
<0.0164
<0. 00981
0.00301
0.00647
0.03/7
• 0.0687
0.00799
0.0196
<0. 00654
t
0.160
0.0754
0.00395
1.43
0.236
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
s
p
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Bo
Li
0.485
t
t
0.0244
3.17
t
t
1
!
;' IM
I. 81,
1.51
t
0.0750
0. 170
'0.00164
0.00832
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values
element analyzed.
I Sample value < blank value.
on
6-8
-------
TABLE 6-3. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SASS PROBE AND CYCLONE RINSE RESIDUE-
VENTURI SCRUBBER
(ug/m3*)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
t
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
0.0331
0.0663
<0. 00828
0.497
0.331
<0.0497
<0. 00166
<0. 00497
<0. 00331
<0. 00331
<0. 00497
0.331
<0. 00828
< 0.00828
<0. 00166
0.0331
0.00497
0.0166
0.00828
oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.0828
0.00828
0.0497
0.0331
0.0497
0.166
0.0331
0.166
0.166
16.6
0.0249
t
<0. 00497
0.0990
0.166
<0. 000828
<0.249
0.0990
<0.0166
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0. 00497
<0. 00828
8.28
0.166
0.828
0.166
3.31
0.232
2.90
0.499
2.49
.497
.0828
4.97
1.66
24.9
0.414
249
14.9
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
49.7
.990
24.9
<0.249
4,970
82.8
33.1
497
6.63
149
24.8
82.8
49.7
1.66
0.496
0.00828
0.497
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
element analyzed.
fSample value < blank value.
6-9
-------
TABLE 6-4. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SASS 10- and 3-|jm PARTICULATES--
VENTURI SCRUBBER
(|jg/m3*)
-------
TABLE 6-5. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SASS 1-Mm AND FILTER PARTICULATES-
VENTURI SCRUBBER—
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
3.47
0.695
2.32
40.2
347
<1.16
<0.0347
<0.116
<0.0579
<0.116
<0.0579
2.89
< 0.0868
0.174
0.0868
0.289
0.0868
0.579
0.174
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
5m
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.868
0.289
0.868
0.405
0.868
2.61
0.523
2.86
1.74
169
0.868
0.347
1.74
20.3
34.5
0.579
26.0
0.347
<0.579
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.174
•0.347
28.9
0.175
2.32
4.05
46.1
11.5
1.88
15.1
289
5.79
28.9
284
113
12.4
4.24
4,310
37.1
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
21.8
174
576
1.09
17,300
840
44.1
23,100
344
241
1,170
133
221
3.28
86.2
2.89
8.67
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
element analyzed.
6-11
-------
TABLE 6-6. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SASS XAD-2 RESIN—VENTURI SCRUBBER
(M9/m3*)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
<1.50
<3.00
<1.50
7.79
<10.0
<50.0
<1.50
2.06
<2.50
<5.00
<2.50
0.0413
<12.5
<2.50
<1.25
<3.75
<7.50
<3. 75
<1.25
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<3.75
<1.25
<3.75
<2.50
<3.75
<3.75
<1.00
0.625
1.27
5.04
<1.12
t
<5.00
<0.750
20.1
<0.375
<7.50
0.762
<5.00
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mri
<0.750
<2.50
11.3
<0.750
<2.50
<0.750
0.656
t
0.516
0.0866
t
<2.50
<0.625
25.4
t
t
t
8.65
1
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
t
3.01
t
<2.50
1,630
1
I
I ,?60
20.2
112
1.11
100
6.16
<5.00
3.81
<0.0250
0.762
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
element analyzed.
fSample value < blank value.
6-12
-------
TABLE 6-7. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SASS CONDENSATE AND FIRST IMPINGER--VENTURI SCRUBBER
(ug/m3*)
1 : —
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
<0.495
<0.989
<0.495
<0.989
<1.98
<19.8
<0.495
<0.989
<0.989
<1.98
< 0.989
< 0.989
<0.989
<0.989
<0.495
<0.989
<2.97
<0.989
<2.97
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<2.97
<0.297
<0.989
<0.989
<0.989
<4.95
<0.297
<0.148
<0.297
1.98
<0.148
2.97
<0.989
<0.297
49.5
<0.247
<2.97
5.93
<1.98
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.495
<0.989
495
0.297
<0.495
<0.198
0.593
0.0989
7.42
43.6
<0.148
<2.97
<0.247
19.8
98.9
1,980
98.9
13,100
297
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
2,970
14.8
989
<1.98
148
49.4
95.9
178,000
11.9
74.2
17.8
4.95
86,100
<9.89
1.44
<0.0495
0.00593
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
element analyzed.
6-13
-------
TABLE 6-8. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SASS PROBE AND CYCLONE RINSE RESIDUE--
OXIDATION TANK VENT
(pg/m3*)
U 0.0000141 Dy 0.0000141 Rh
Th 0.0000281 Tb 0.00000703 Ru
Bi <0.00000281 Gd 0.0000281 Mo
Pb 0.00141 Eu 0.00000703 Nb
Tl 0.000141 Sm 0.0000422 Zr
Hg <0.0000422 Nd 0.000141 Y
Au <0.00000141 Pr 0.0000281 Sr
Pt <0.00000422 Ce 0.0000703 Rb
Ir ^0.00000281 La 0.0000985 Br
Os <0.00000281 Ba 0.0141 Se
Re <0.00000422 Cs 0.0000211 As
W 0.000422 I 0.0105 Ge
Ta <0.0000703 Te <0.00000422 Ga
Hf <0.00000703 Sb 0.0000844 Zn
Lu <0.00000141 Sn 0.000281 Cu
Yb 0.0000281 In <0.000000703 Ni
Tm 0.00000703 Cd <0.000211 Co
Er 0.00000703 Ag 0.000844 Fe
Ho 0.00000422 Pd <0.0000141 Mn
<0.00000422 Cr
<0.00000703 V
0.00492 Ti
0.000141 Sc
0.000985 Ca
0.0000985 K
0.00281 Cl
0.000197 S
0.00352 P
0.00190 Si
0.000211 Al
0.000422 Mg
0.0000352 Na
0.0281 f
0.00352 B
0.0703 Be
0.00141 Li
0.211
0.0127
0.127
0.00127
0.00703
<0.0000844
2.11
0.0422
0.0281
0.281
0.00281
0.0842
0.0844
0.0703
0.0422
0.00141
0.00843
0.00000703
0.000127
*Data available for
element analyzed.
uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
6-14
-------
TABLE 6-9. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SASS XAD-2 RESIN-OXIDATION TANK VENT
(ug/ffl3*)
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
1.38
t
<1.38
t
•:9.20
-,4(1.0
<1.38
t
<2.30
<4.60
<2.30
t
<16.1
<2.30
<1.15
<3.45
<6.90
O.45
<1.15
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sin
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<3.45
<1.15
<3.45
<2.30
<3.45
<3.45
t
0.575
t
t
<1.03
t
<4.60
<0.690
<2.30
<0.345
<6.90
<0.690
<4.60
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
N1
Co
fe
Mn
<0.690
<2.30
1.14
<0.690
'-2.30
< 0.690
r
t
t
<3.22
t
<2.30
<0.575
t
t
t
t
t
t
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
t
t
t
<2.30
J14
1
1
t
18.4
172
t
t
t
<4.60
t
<.0230
.686
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
element analyzed.
tSample value < blank value.
6-15
-------
TABLE 6-10. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPEC1ROSCOPY
SASS COMPENSATE AND FIRST IMPINGER--OXIDATION TANK VENT
(jjg/m3*)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
An
Pt.
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
<0.218
<0.437
<0.218
0.437
•,0.873
<8.73
< 0.218
« 0.437
•0.437
-0.873
v 0.437
<0.437
<2.18
<0.437
<0.218
<0.437
<1.31
<0.437
<1.31
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<1.31
<0.131
<0.437
< 0.437
<0.437
< 0.437
< 0.873
'•0.0655
< 0.873
2.18
<0.0655
t
<0.437
0.131
43.7
<0.0655
<1.31
2.62
< 0.873
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rh
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.218
<0.437
6.55
0.0873
<0.218
<0.0873
0. 175
0.02f,2
0.546
0.917
<0.0655
<0.873
<0.437
4.37
6.55
43.7
0.655
262
13.1
Cr
V
Ti
Sr.
C«i
K
tl
v.
p
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
65.5
0.655
109
<0.873
65.3
43.7
26,200
7 , 860
5.?4
32. 7
24.9
2.18
14,400
<4.37
6.53
< 0.02 18
0.0131
*Data available for uncorrected sample values
element analyzed.
tSample value < blank value.
carbon blank values on each
6-16
-------
TABLE 6-11.
SASS PROBE
SPARK SOURCE MASS
AND CYCLONE RINSE
TCA SCRUBBER
(ug/m3*)
SPECTROSCOPY
RESIDUE"
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
0.0847
0.169
<0. 00339
0.0847
0.0339
<0.0508
<0. 00169
^0.00508
<0. 00339
<0. 00339
<0. 00339
0.0339
<0.0339
<0. 00847
<0. 00169
0.0339
0.0169
0.0339
0.0169
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.169
0.0169
0. 169
0.0847
0.169
0.847
0.169
0.593
0.847
16.9
0.0508
<0.0127
<0. 00508
0.0508
0.0847
<0. 000847
<0.102
0.0152
< 0.0.169
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0. 00508
< 0.00847
0.254
0.169
1.19
0.847
1.69
0.169
0.423
0.273
0.423
1.19
0.0847
0.169
1.69
4.23
1.69
508
2.54
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
15.2
2.54
84.7
0.339
2,540
8.47
8.42
508
13.5
1,020
1,020
16.9
3.04
1.69
0.507
0.0254
0.508
*Data available for
element analyzed.
uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
6-17
-------
1ABLL 6-12. SPARK SOURCf MASS
SASS 10- AND 3-pm PARTICULAI'ES--
(pg/m3*)
SPICIROSCOPY
ICA SCRUBBfcR
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
0.137
0.137
<0. 00683
0.683
0.137
<0.273
<0. 00683
< 0.027 3
-0.0273
• 0.02/3
v 0.02 73
<0.0273
•0.137
< 0.0273
< 0.00683
0.0683
0.00583
0.0683
0.0273
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.205
0.0683
0.205
0.0683
0.273
0.683
0.273
1.37
0.683
41.0
0.0615
0.0205
<0.0273
0.164
0.137
<0.0205
<0.205
0.205
<0.0273
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
0.00683
<0.0273
0.683
0.410
4.10
2.05
13.7
5.47
0.513
0.220
1.03
4.10
2.05
13.7
1.03
0.683
1.37
205
8.20
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
c
C
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
4.10
4.10
68.3
1.37
3,420
;.J73
G.79
•110
16.4
820
410
68.3
82.0
0.273
4.10
0.137
1.23
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and
element analyzed.
carbon blank values on each
6-18
-------
TABLE 6-13. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SASS 1-Min AND FILTER PARTICULATES--TCA SCRUBBER
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
10.5
1.25
0.418
1.80
6.27
<2.09
<0.732
0.627
<0.105
<0.209
<0.105
5.23
<0.627
1.57
<0.523
1.57
<0.627
2.09
0.627
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
5.23
3.14
5.23
1.57
4.18
15.4
6.21
10.4
10.5
623
0.784
0.157
1.05
1.99
6.06
0.523
15.7
0.627
<1.05
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.314
<2.09
26.1
0.674
10.5
20.9
41.6
4.12
1
27.9
52.1
6.27
10.5
4.73
18.0
26.3
5.12
7,810
t
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
27.1
188
520
10.4
5,150
23.7
t
J5.600
624
449
4,660
t
t
0.113
156
2.61
1.55
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
element analy/ed.
tSatnple value < blank value.
6-19
-------
TABLE 6-14. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SASS XAD-2 RESIN--TCA SCRUBBER
(|jg/m3*)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hq
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
1.49
t
-. 1 . 49
1
v9.96
-,49.8
•1.49
1IM
^2.49
•4.98
<2.49
t
U2.5
<2.49
<1.25
<3.74
<7.47
<3.74
U. 25
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<3.74
<1.25
O. 74
<2.49
<3. 74
<-3.74
t
0.623
1
t
<1.12
<1.87
<4.98
<0. 747
t
<0.374
<7.47
<0. 747
^4.98
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.747
<2.49
I
<0.74/
<2.49
vO.747
1
1
t
t
t
<2.49
<0.623
1
t
t
t
1
I
Cr t
V t
M !
Sc >2.49
Ca 1 24
K I
Cl <2.4(j
'' 1
P !
Si --22.4
A] t
Mg f
Na t
F <4.98
B t
Be < 0.0249
Li 0.745
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
element analyzed.
•(•Sample value < blank value.
6-20
-------
TABLE 6-15. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SASS CONDENSATE AND FIRST IMPINGER--TCA SCRUBBER
(ug/m3*)
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
LU
Yb
Trn
Er
Ho
<0.184
<0.368
<0.184
0.736
<1.47
<7.36
<0.368
<0.368
<0.368
<0.736
< 0.368
^0.368
<1.84
<0.368
<0.184
<0.368
<1.10
<0.368
<0.368
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<1.10
<0.110
<0.368
<0.368
<0.368
<0.736
<1.10
<0.0552
22.1
2.57
<0.0552
0.827
<0.368
<0.110
0.368
<0.0552
<1.10
0.331
<0.736
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.184
<0.368
9.19
<0.0736
<0.184
<0.0736
0.221
0.0588
3.68
8.50
< 0.0552
< 0.736
<0. 184
3.68
7.36
27.6
0.368
187
13.2
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
C1
S
P
Si
AT
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
44.1
0.221
27.6
<0.736
73.4
29.4
22,400
478
44.1
7.72
61.8
3.68
12,100
<3.68
22.0
<0. 00368
0.0331
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
element analyzed.
6-21
-------
TABLE 6-16. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
VENTURI FILTER CAKE
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
1.30
5.20
• -0.260
2. GO
2.60
<3.90
^0.130
< 0.390
v 0.2 60
< 0.260
• 0.260
0.390
<0.650
<0.650
<0.130
2.60
0.390
2.60
0.650
Dy
Tb
(id
tu
Sin
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
3.90
1.30
6.50
3. 90
13.0
39.0
13.0
32.5
26.0
650
1.37
<1.37
<0.390
0.780
2.60
^0.0650
<1.17
<0.0780
<1.30
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
-0.390
-0.650
<1.5b
3 . 90
b5.0
39.0
130
13.0
3.25
-,0.910
19.5
26.0
6.50
13.0
19.5
195
65.0
19,500
38.9
Cr
V
I i
SL
Cci
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
39.0
39.0
J ,950
39.0
390,000
2,600
386
b!>,000
260
78,000
78,000
650
194
78.0
77.9
1.30
7.80
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
element analyzed.
6-22
-------
TABLE 6-17. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
VENTURI SPRAY TOWER SLURRY—SOLIDS
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
2.60
2.60
<0.130
2.60
2.60
<3.90
-0.130
<0.390
<0.390
<0.390
<0.650
0.650
<1.30
<0.390
<0.130
0.390
0.130
1.30
0.130
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
2.60
1.30
3.90
0.390
6.50
26. U
13.0
32.5
13.0
390
1.95
<0.975
<0.390
1.56
2.60
<0.325
<3.90
<0.0780
<0.390
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.130
<0.390
13.0
2.90
26.0
13.0
130
26.0
975
20.9
195
65.0
6.50
260
195
32.5
19.5
3,900
195
Cr
V
Ti 1,
Sc
Ca 780,
K ?,
Cl 26,
S 260,
P
Si 19,
Al 11,
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
11.7
39.0
300
<39.0
000
600
oou
000
104
500
700
260
77.2
260
117
1.30
3.90
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
element analyzed.
6-23
-------
TABLE 6-18. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPS
VENTURI SPRAY TOWER SLURRY--LIQUID
(pg/L*)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
<15.
<31.
• 15.
31.
010
<619
01.
<61.
<61.
.61.
-92.
Ol.
v92.
<92.
<15.
01.
01.
01.
<15.
.5
.0
.5
.0
0
9
9
9
9
0
9
9
5
0
0
0
5
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
1
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
Ol. 0
<15. 5
<92. 9
0 1 . 0
Ol.O
<61. 9
<15.5
<7.74
<92.9
9,290
<13.9
9,240
<61. 9
<92.9
<92.9
<46.4
''929
*•' i o a
<- xo . D
<61. 9
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
MM
<15.5
<92.9
4 , 640
< I'j. b
<15.b
<9.29
16,100
1,860
209,000
<433
0,100)
3 , 100
<15.5
3,100
310
310
310
83.6
20,400
Cr
V
n
Sc
C.T
K
Cl
s
n
Si
Al
Mq
Na
F
B
Be
l.i
1
11 ,600
774
7 , 740
S.570
92
10
i,?40
158
8
1 1 1
1
65.
92.
, 080
•• fi 1 .
, 000
,000
,000
,000
12.
,400
,100
,000
,000
,670
,000
31.
,300
.0
,9
9
4
0
*Data available for uncorrected sample valuer and carbon blank values on each
element analyzed.
tInterference from calcium chloride.
6-24
-------
TABLE 6-19. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
TCA CENTRIFUGE CAKE
(ug/g*)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
T1
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
2.60
5.20
<0.260
2.60
2.60
O.90
< 0.130
<0.390
<0.260
•0.260
-0.260
0.390
< 0.650
<0.390
<0.130
2.60
0.130
3.90
1.30
Dy
Tb
Gd
Fu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
3.90
1.30
6.50
2.60
Jil.O
65.0
26.0
45.5
91.0
650
0.390
<0.975
<0.390
0.780
1.30
<0.0650
<1.17
^0.0780
<0.650
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nli
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
<0.130
<0.390
4.55
6.50
65.0
39.0
130
13.0
32.5
<1.82
19.5
6.50
6.50
13.0
32.5
195
13.0
19,500
38.9
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
c,i
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
39.0
39.0
1,950
39.0
390 , 000
2,600
646
39,000
104
78,000
78,000
260
116
78.0
19.4
0.650
1.95
*Data available for uncorrected sample values and carbon blank values on each
element analyzed.
G-2b
-------
TABLE 6-20 . SUMMARY OF SASS SAMPLING DATA
Vencuri Oxidation Tank
Scrubber Vent
Date of Test
Test Period, Mrs (CST)
Sampling Duration, min
Sample volume, dscm
Avg sampling rate, dscm/rnin
Frobe Temperature, C -
Oven Temperature, C -
Gas Outlet of
Condenser, C
Gas Outlet of
Impingers, C
Percent isokinetic
sampling rate
Filters required/ test
Avg
Max
Min
Avg
Max
Min
Avg
Max
Min
Avg
Max
Min
1/29/79
1/30/79
1342-0122
315
30.906
0.098
197
205
192
205
208
199
18
25
9
12
24
6
82.8
8
1/31/79
1030-1615
305
32.874
0.108
161
195
151
202
207
197
11
13
3 .
11
15
5
518
1
TCA Scrubber
2/2/79
0915-2005
285
30.410
0.107
201
207
197
204
205
199
16
23
3
14
23
6
77.3
8
6-26
-------
TABLE 6-21. SUMMARY OF STACK GAS CONDITIONS DURING SASS TESTS
(a)
Venturi Scrubber
lue Gas Parameter Outlet
irg. gas temperature, C
tatic Pressure, mm Hg below
atmospheric
., % by volume, dry
0,, % by volume, dry
»g. SO- concentration, mg/m
bisture, % by volume
blecular weight, g/g mole (dry)
»g. velocity, m/3 (stack cond.)
rg. volumetric flow, m /hr (std, dry)
110
62.6
8.2
13.7
245
12.3
30.5
24.99
45504
Oxidation
Tank Vent TCA Scrubber Outlet
39
0
13.8
9.5
152
6.9
30.1
3.11
180
109
46.7
9.0
13.0
504
10.6
30.4
27.86
53063
a) Measured at scrubber outlets and vent line from oxidation tank.
b) Determined by Level 1 on-site GC measurements
d) Determined from SASS runs.
c) Obtained from TVA continuous monitor readings. Data reported under oxidation
tank vent is for venturi scrubber outlet during the period the vent was sampled.
6-27
-------
TABU: 6-22.
LC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contractor
Sample Site
BCL
Shawnee/venturi scrubber outler
Acquivitjon ._,_
1/29/79
Type of Source
Test Number
Coal-fired power plant w/venturi scrubber (adipic ar.id)
-RCT.-VSS-3 Sample ID Number SSP-BCL-PR-VSS-1
Sample Description ...SASS probe + cyclone rinse
Original Sample Volume or Mass _.° • 35.81S
„ ... . i R. L. Barbour
Responsibis Analyst
Calculations and Report Revie\v«d By
J. Howes
Date Analy?ed
Report Date
4/9/79
Column Flow Rate
Dhssrvations
Column Ternperature
tal Sample
Taken for LC2
Recovered
TCO
mg
GRAV
mg
2.98
Total
mg-
2.98
Cancentiation5
mcjl.r
0.1Q
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sum
•••f* n il •
i CO in mg
Total
Blank
Cor-
rected
•
GRAV4 in mg
Toul
Blink
Cor-
rected
Total4
mg
Concentration^
ing/M3
1. Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC
2. Portion o< whole sample used for LC, actual mg
.3...Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg _
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
5. Total mg divided by total volums
6-28
-------
TABLE 6-23. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contractor
BCL
. f e-t. Shawnee/venturl scrubber outlet . . . ... * 1/29/79
Sunpt* Sitt —_-__—_________________ Simple Acquisition Date
Typ«
1 Source Coal-fired power plant w/venturi scrubber (adipic acid)
Test Number
Simpl*
SSP-BCL-VSS-1
Sample 10 Number
SSP-BCL-10C-VSS-1
SASS 10 + 3 urn cvclone paniculate extract
Original Sample Volume or Mao
0.4912g
taponsible Analyst
R. L. Barbour
oni ind Report Reviewed By
J. Howes
Date Analyzed
Report Cite
A/9/79
Flow Rate
Column Temperature
ISamp'"1
I forLC2
mtd3
.TCO
mg
.
•
GRAV
mg
65.8
Total
mg-
65.8
Concentration
mg/M3
2.13
•*
p-ietfon
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
Sum
TCO* in mg
Total
Blank
Cor-
rected
•
GRAV4 In mg
Total
Blank
Cor-
rected
Total4
mg
Concentration5
mg/M3
•
I. Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC
I Portion of whole umple used (or LC, tctuil mg
^Quantity recovered Irom LC column, actual mg..
I, T0t»| mg computed back to total sample
\ Total W divided by total volume
6-29
-------
TABLE 6-24. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contractor
BCL
Sample Sito Shawnee/venturi scrubber outlet 5,^,, Acquisiticn 0*ate 1/29/79
Type of Snlirr£oal"fired power plant w/venturi scrubber (adipic acid)
Test Number - _ Samp!? ID Number SSP-BCL-PF-VSS-1
Sample
SASS 1
+ filter extract
Orioinal Simple Volume or Mais 1. QQADg
R.L. Barbour
Respomibls Analyst
Oat* Analyzed
Calculations and Report Reviswad By
J. Howes
4/9/79
Report Date .._...
Colurr.n ."low Hu^s
Observations ___
"1 ml/mln
Colu.iin Temperature
'17C
'
i ctal Sample
Te
-------
TABIE 6-25. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
BCL
Contractor _ — — _
Shawnee/venturi scrubber outlet * 1/29/79
Simple Site J ' Sample Acquisition Dste
Type of Source
'Coal-fired power plant w/venturi scrubber (adipic acid)
Ten Number SSP-BCL-VSS-1
SSP-BCL-XR-VSS-1
Sample ID Number SSP-BCL-MR-VSS-1
SampI* Description.
SASS XAD-2 extract + module rinse
Original Sample Volume or Man
148 g XAD-2 + 320 ml module rinse
Responsible Analyst
R.L. Barbour .
Calculations ind Report Reviewed By J- Howes
Date Analyzed
Report Dat:
"1 ml/min
Column Temperature
"16C
Jbsarvationi
W Sample1
unfor LC
twtred3
TCQ ..
019
GRAV
mg
Total
mj-
16.11
Concentration
mg/M3
' 1.37
1.37
0.60
•*
Fraction
— •
1
2
- 3
4
5
6
7
Sum
"CO* in mg
Total
.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.68
.03
3.73
Blank
•07
0.00
0.00
0.07
0.01
.17
0.00
0.32
Cor-
rectid
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3.51
.03
3.54
GRAV4inmg
Total
.25
.29
.61
.66
.37
13.46
.36
Blank
1.43
.09
.37
.19
.19
1.98
1.93
Cor-
rected
0.00
.20
.24
.47
.18
11.48
0.00
12.57
Total4
mg
0.00
.20
.24
.47
.18 •
14.99
.03
16.11
Concentration^
mg/M3
o.oo • •
0.01
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.54
0.01
0.60
1. Quantity in entire sample, determined bsfcre LC
2. Portion of whola sample used for L C, trtual ng
.3_Quantity recovered from LC column, actusl m? ..
4. Total rng computed back to total {.irnpl*
S. Total nig divided by total volume
6-31
-------
TABLE 6-26. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contractor
BCL
Sample Sit, Shawnee/venturl scrubber outlet s§mpje Acquijition D;ti 1/29/79
Type of Source Coal"f ired j)Qwer plant w/venturi scrubber (adipic acid)
Number
SSP-BCL-VSS-1
c,m«r. in hi k SSP-BCL-CD/LE-VSS-l
Sample PD Number
„ . n . . SASS Condensate Extract
Sample Description __^_^______________
Original Sample Volume or Mm
220 ml
Responsible Analyu
R.L. Harbour
DITV Analyzed
Calculaitoni and Report R«viiw*d By Jf Howes
Report Date
4/9/79
Column Flow Rate
ml/min
Column Temperature
16C
Observations
Total Sample'
Taken forLC2
Recovered3
TCO
mg
v7
-
GRAV
mg
1.98
Total
ing-
2.68
Canctruration
mg/M
0.09
1. Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC
2. Portion ol whole sjmpte u:ed for LC. actual mg
.3... Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg _
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
5, Total mg divided by total volume
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
"^^^^"•^^^^^^^^"^^^"^^^^^^-^•i
7
Sum
TCQ4 in mg
Total
Blank
Cor-
rected
•
GRAV4 in mg
Total
Blank
Cor-
rected
Total4
mg
Concemration5
ma/Tvl3
•
6-32
-------
TABLE 6-27. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
idntractor
BCL
Sample Acquisition Date I/31/
site Shawnee/oxidation tank vent
Vpe of Source Coal-fired power plant w/venturj^^crubber (adipic acid)
;«NUmb.r SSP-BCL-OTV-2
Sample 10 Nurnbtr
SSP-BCL-PF-OTV-2
impfe Description
SASS Filter extract
[ritfnal Sample Volume or Mia 0*0012g
npaniihlt Analyst
R.L. Barbour
Pitt Analyzed
Ifculationi and Report Reviewed By
J, Howes
Report Date
A/9/79
lolurnn Flow Rate
Column Temperature
JSampft'
wforLC2
)»red
TCO
mg
—
GRAV
mg
16,24
Total
mg-
16.24
Concentration
mg/P-13
0.49
-
•*
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sum
TtO* in mg
Total
Blank
Cor*
rerted
4
GRAV4 in mg
Total
Stank
Cor*
rected
Toul4
mg
•
Concentration*
mg/M3
-
. Quantity In entire sample* determined befora 1C
I Portion of whola «mple used for LC, actual mQ
LQuantity recovered from LC column, actual mg .
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
L Total mg divided by total volume
6-33
-------
TABLE 6-28. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contractor
Sample Sita
BCL
Shawnee/oxidation tank vent
[l Acquisition Dato 1/31/79 _____
Type of Source
Tert Number
Coal-fired power plant w/venturi scrubber (adipic acid)
SSP-BCL-OTV-2
SSP-BCL-XR-OTV-2
Sample ID Number SSP-BCL-MR-OTV-2
Sample Description
SASS XAD-2 extract + module rinse
Original Sample Volume or Mass
R.L. Barbour
Responsible Analyst
148 g XAD-2 4- total sample
Dats Analyzed
J. Howes
4/9/79
Column Plow F>
bsarvations
il Samplu1
Taken for LC2
Recovered
.-ii» ~1 tnl/min Ct^mn Ttmp.rnTnm ~16C
TCO ..
mg
GRAV
mg
Total
tng-
Cancsntr^tion'1 j
rng/f.13
1.49
1.49 • " j
1.10 1
3
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
S
7
Sum
TCO" in mg
Tot:!
.15
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
.62
0.00
.77
Blank
.07
0.00
0.00
.07
.01
.17
0.00
0.32
Cof-
rrr;?d
.08
.45
.53
GRAV4inrng
To til
6.45
.32
1.32
.65
.46
7.93
18.12
35.25
Blink
1.43
.09
.37
.19
.19
1.97
1.93
6.17
Cor-
recttd
5.02
.23
.95
.46
.27
5.96
16.19
29.08
Total4
mg
5.10
.23
.95
.46
.27
6.41
16.19
29.61
Conccntrstior-^ |
m3/r.',3
0.17
0.10 I
0.03 !
[— t
0.02
0.01
0.22
0.55 !
1.10
1. Quantity in cniirr sample. rlc:;rmir;;d before LC
2. Portion of v.'liob sample u:ed for LC. jcfjal nj
.3. Quantity recovered from LC coljrnn. sctusl mg
4, Total rng computed bzck to total sample
0. Totol mg divided by total volume
6-34
-------
TABLE 6-29. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
Shawnee/oxidation tank vent
Sample Acquisition Data 1/31/79
. Sourw Coal-fired power plant w/venturi scrubber (adipic acid)
«t Number
SSP-BCL-OTV-2
Sample ID Number
SSP-BCL-CD/LE-OTV-2
3irscription
SASS condensate extract
er 5«irnpU Volume or Mia
Ifin ml
4poo5ibl* Analyst
R.L. Harbour
Date Analyzed
4/9/79
mn Flo** R
Simple1
lor LCZ
i?
»»» _.,. Column Ttmpifatur*
TCO .. .
mg
.
GRAV
mg
1.12
Total
mg-
1.12
Concentration
mg/M^
0.03
Fraction
1
2
3
4
8
8
7
turn
TtO*lnmg
Total
Blank
Coi-
recttd
•
GRAV4 in mj
Total
Blank
Cor*
reeled
Total4
mg
Concentration5
mg/M^
in cntir* JamP''. dcterminid before LC
rtrtior* o\ whole ample used lor LC. actual mg
QumtitV recovered from LC column, actual mg.
Total m0 computed back to total sample
Total mfl divided by total volume
6-35
-------
TABLE 6-30. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
r;»Shavnee/TCA scrubber outlet _ ^m^f Acqu;lition 0*atl
T e of Source Coal-fired power plant v/venturi scurbber _
2/2/79
_ ,, k
Test Number
SSP-BCL-TCAS-3
c , m .. ,
Sample ID Number
SSP-BCL-PR-TCAS-3
amph ascription SASS probe + cyclone rinse
Original Sample Volume or Mass
0.3600g
Responsible Analyst
R.L. Barbour
Date Analysed
Calculations and Report Reviewed By
J. Howes
Reptirt Date .._i/i/Zi_
Column Flew Rats
Column Temperature __
Total Sample1
Taken for LC2
Recovered
TCO
mg
.
GRAV
mg
4.01
Total
mg
4.01
Concentration''
mg/7>13
0.13
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sum
TCO4 in mg
Total
Blank
Cot-
rtned
-
GRAV4 in mg
Total
Blank
Cor-
rected
Total''
mg
Conccniratijn^
mg/M3
1. Quantity in enttrr sample, determined before LC
2. Portion of whole somple used for LC, actual mg
.3... Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg .
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
5. Total mg divided by total volume
6-36
-------
TABLE 6-31. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
sitt Shawnee/TCA scrubber outlet S)m(>,e Acquisi,ion rjata 2/2/79
I f Sourw Coal-fired power plant w/TCA scrubber
«t Number
SSP-BCL-TCAS-3
Simple ID Number
oar—
SSP-BCL-3C-TCAS-3
Wplt Description
SASS 10 + 3 um cyclone particulate extract
Sample Volume or Mass Q.4155g^
Analyn R.L. Harbour
Date Analyzed
Eolations and Report Reviewed By - J. Howes
Report Date
4/9/79
bran Flow Rate
fampl*
^•i^^^^^T
ifor LC
2
Column Temperature
^w
^mm
••—
TCQ . .
mg
__
•
GRAV
mg
30.85
Total
mg
30.85
Concentration
1.01
•
•*
Fraction
1
i — —
^_2
— —
4
5
6
7
•urn
TCO* in mij
Total
Blink
Cor-
rected
•
GRAV4inmg
Toul
Blank
Cor-
rected
Total4
mg
Concentration^
mg/M3
• •
W>titV '" cntire samP|(> determined before LC
'trtion of whole somple used for LC, actual mg
btntilY recovered from LC column, actual mj
jtal rnfl computed back to total urnpli
divided by total volume
6-37
-------
TABLE 6-32. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contractor
BCL
$jmp!e Site Shawnee/TCA scrubber outlet
Type of Source Coal~fired power plant w/TCA scrubber
Acquisition Date __L_Z____
Test lumber
SfjP-BCT ,-TCAS-
SSP-BCL-1C-TCAS-3
Sampl? ID Number
Sample Description SASS 1 pm cyclone. + filter extract
Original Sample Volume or Mass 1.5866 g
Responsibl* Analyst R'L' Barbour
Dat? Analyzed
Calculations and Report Reviewed By
J. Howes
Report Dm?
2/9/79
Column Flow F
Observations
Total Sample
Taken for LC2
Recovered
•
Fraction
ato ~1 ml/rnin
TCO
mg
TCO in mg
I" Cor
Trtt-l! 1 Ell-inLr ».**.
Tnlirn^n ',"<
GRAV
mg
38.89
GRAV4 in ma
Cor-
•rnperaturp 16C
Total
38.81
Total4
mg
"
• — • —
. _
•* Lonccrstrstitr)
1.28
1.28
I. 41
Concontr?-;'^')^
rng/:.'^
1. Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC
2. Portion of whol? sample !j:?d for LC. actual ing
.3. Quantity rcrovettd (roui LC column, actuj! mg _ . .
1. lc;al mg compu;:d Lack to loul s.nnple
5. Totol mg divided by tct:l volume
6-J8
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
G
7
Sum
TCO in mg
Tola! Plank
Cor-
rsrt?d
GRAV4 in mg
Tc'jl
.62
.05
.10
.10
.10
18.88
7.50
27. 35
Eton!*.
.01
.02
.02
.07
.02
.05
.02
0.21
Cor-
t?:t:J
.61
.03
.08
.03
.08
18.83
7.48
27.1 4
Total4
mg
0.95
0.05
0.12
0.05
0.12
29.19
11.60
42.08
Concontr?-.
rn g /'.'i-'
0.03
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.96
0 . 38
l.i]
-------
TABLE 6-33. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
BCL
. _•. Shawnee/TCA Scrubber outlet
S»mp»« SIM —
Typ
Sourcs
Somp!» Acquisition Data
Coal-fired power plant w/TCA scrubber
2/2/79
Tijt Number SSP-BCL-TCAS-3
SSP-BCL-MR-TCAS-3
Samp!* 10 Number SSP-BCL-XR-TCAS-3
Samp'* Oescripti
lien .
SASS XAD-2 extract + module rinse
Origin*! Sample Volume or Mais
HHp.nsibhAn.l-/st R.L. Barbour
t! Analyzed
Nictitations znd Report Reviewed By
J. Howes
Report Data
4/9/79
Colo—" FIow
Observations
•—• TT
Total Sa«"P|§
"1 ml/min
Column Ten.peratuu "16C
TCO ..
mg
GRAV
mg
Total
mg-
Concentration |
mg/iVi3 J
• 1.15 !
-1
1.15 •' |
0.41 !
•» .
Fraction
•» •
1
,-
2
3
,-:; ' *
•:; s
'•:': B
:- 7
^•iv. Sum
7CO in mg
Total
0.00
0.00
.08
.06
.04
2.92
.11
3.21
Blank
.07
0.00
0.00
.07
.01
.17
0.00
0.32
Cor-
rectsd
0.00
0.00
.08
0.00
.03
2.75
.11
2,97
GRAV4 in mg
Tcul
2.64
.13
.70
.35
.50
6.50
2.79
13.61
Blank
1.43
.09
.37
.19
.19
1.97
1.93
6.17
Cor-
rected
1.21
.04
.33
.16
.31
4.53
.86
7.44
Total4
mg
1.28
.04
.41
.16
.34
7.28
.97
10.41
Concentration^
mg/M^
0.05
0.01
0.02
0.01
0.01
0.27
0.04
0.41
,.|. Quantity in jr.:,re sample, determined before LC
2, Portion of v.^cli sample u:ed (or LC, actual mg
g^ Quantity rccv.jred from LC column, actual mg .
4*~ Total rr.5 cor?t;?d back to total i-imple
^ Total mg ii..'i;d by total volums
6-39
-------
TABLE 6-34 . |_C ANALYSIS REPORT
Contractor
Sample Site
BCL
Shawnee/TCA scrubber outlet
*• O / O / ~" Q
Sample Acquisition Date _ _._!__
Type of Source Coal-fired power plant w/TCA scrubber
Test Number SSP-BCL-TCAS-3 Sample ID Number SSP-BCL-CD/LE-TCAS-3_
Sample Description,
SASS condensate extract
Original Sampl* Volume or Mass
460 ml
Responsibl* Analyst
R.L. Barbour
Date Analyzed
Calculations and Report Reviewed By
J. Howes
4/9/79
.... Fie port D.ite
Column Flow Rats
Observations
Column Temperature
no LC
Total Sample1
Taken for LC2
Recovered
TCO
mg
1.0
GRAV
mg
1.93
Total
mg-
2.93
Cnnccntrsticn^
in s/'M"
0 . 10
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sum
7CO* in mg
Total
Blank
Cor-
recud
•
GRAV'4 in mg
Total
Blank
„
Cor-
rected
Tour1
mg
Concentration'^
mg/ulj
1. Quantity in entiro sample, determined before LC
?. Portion of whole sompl; used lor LC, actual mg
.3.. Quantity recovered Irom LC column, actual mg .
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
5. Total mg divided by total voluma
6-4U
-------
TABLE 6-35. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
Contractor —B£L_
. Site Shawnee/venturi sludge filter ^^ Acquilition D*at, 1/29/79
T of Source Coal-fired power plant w/venturi scrubber (adipic acid)
Tut Number
SSP-BCL-VSS-1
Sample 10 Number
SSP-BCL-FC
fcmple Description
Venturi filter cake extract
{Main*' Sample Voluma or Mau
Analyst
R.L. Barbour
Calculation* and Report Reviewed By
J. Howes
Date Analyzed
Report Date
A/9/79
Column Flow Rats
"I ml/mln
Column Temperature
15C
iHJSainPle>
fen for LC
torercd
TCO , .
mg
0.2
. 0.18
.07
GRAV
mg
15.62
14.06
10.57
Total
mg'
15.82
14.24
10.64
Concentration
Mg/Ks
15.82
15 . 82
11.82
Fraction
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
Sam
TtO* in mg
Total
.01
—
—
—
—
.06
—
.07
Blank
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cor-
rectsd
•
GRAV4 in mg
Total
1.08
.08
.68
.66
.59
5.25
2.44
Blank
.01
.02
.02
.07
.02
.05
.02
Cor-
rected
1.07
.06
.66
.59
*57
5.20
2.42
10.57
Toul4
mg
1.08
.06
.66
.59
.57
5.26
2.42
10.64
Concentration^
mg/Kg
1.20
0.06
0.73
0.66
0.63
5.84
2.69
11.82
1. Quantity in entire sample, determined bifori LC
J. portion of whole umpli used (or LC. actual mg
X. Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg _
4t 70cal mg computed back to total sampl*
J, Total
-------
TABLE 6-36. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
BCL
Contractor
Sample Sits ghawnee/venturi spray tower
Sample Acquisition Date -
Tyog of Source Coal-fired power plant w/venturi scrubber (adipic acid)
SSP-BCL-VSS-1
Test Number
Sample ID Number
SSP-BCL-VSTS
Sample Description JVenturi_ spraytower slurry extract
Originaf Sample Volum* or
10 liters
Responsible Analyst _.R'L' Barbour
Date Analyzed
Calculations and Report Reviewed By
J. Howes
Report Date
1/9/79
Column Flow Rate "1 ml/min
Observations
Column Temperature 1->(-'
-tal Sample1
Taken for LC
Recovered
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sum
TCO
mg
. 5.9
5.3
3.24
Total
—
—
—
—
—
2.90
.34
3.24
GRAV
mg
33.82
30.44
18.84
TCO1* in mg
Blank
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
Cor-
rected
Total
mg
39.72
35-75
22.08
— • — __
GRAV4 in mg
Total
8. 72
.68
.41
1.22
1.20
5.35
1.47
19.05
Blank
.01
Cor-
rected
8.71
.02 1 .66
.02
.07
.39
1.15
•02| 1.18
.05
.02
5.30
1-45
18.84
Total4
mg
8.71
.66
.39
1.15
1.18
8.20
1.79
22.08
Cor!cen!,-?tiona
H3E/T,
3.972
3. 97?
2.453
Concentration^
mg/L
0.968
0.073
0.043
0.128
"oTnT"
0.911
0.199
2.451< "
___. ^
2. Ponion o( whole sample uied (or LC, actual mg
.3... Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg .
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
5. Total mg divided fay iota! volume
6-42
-------
1ABLE 6-37. LC ANALYSIS REPORT
BCL
Site Shavmee/TCA sludge centrifuge S|lhple Acquisition Data 2/2/79
f Source Coal-fired power plant w/TCA scrubber
tat Number
SSP-BCL-TCAS-3
Simple ID Number
SSP-BCL-CC
tunpf* Oiscription.
TCA centirfuge cake extract
Origin'i Sample Volume or Mau 1 K
Analyst R.L. Harbour
Calculations and Report Reviewed By
Oat A Analyzed
Report Oats
A/9/79
Mum"
Rat8
Column Temperatuira
1
»
TCO . .
mg
.1
GRAV
mg
9.57
Total
mg
9.67
Concentration
Mg/Kg "
9.67
Fraction
- - » •
1
2
• 3
*
; s
6
7
Sum
TCO* inmg
Total
Blank
Cor-
rected
•
GRAV4 inmg
Tout
Blank
Cor*
rected
Total4
mg
Concentration5
mg/M-*
•
I. OuantitY in entire sample, determined before LC
2, portion of whole umple used for LC, actual mg
^Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg _
4; Tot*' mg computed back to total sample
S. Tots' mg divided by total volume
6-43
-------
TABLE 6-38
IR REPORT
SAMPLE.tJnt"ractionat:ed SanPle or" SAS3 Probe and Cyclone Rinse - Venturi Scr-jbbcr
Wm Numktr
(cm'1)
1970, 2933, 2365
1745
1730
1463
1385
735
Intimity
s
w
w
M
tf
W
Aj.iBnmtot Coalman
CH?. CHI stre-_-h
C-0 stretch
C-0 stretch shoulder
CHj band
CH} bend
-(CH,)n-
Predominately alipnatic nyarocarbon. Snail anour.ts c: two carbonyl containing
compounds, probably ester and acid.
IR REPOR1
SAMPLE:
TABLE 6-39
. Unfractionaeed SASS 10 + 3 un Particular Extract - Y-ic.iri Scrubber
Wfrt Nurnbtr
(cm'1)
3370.
1920, 2355.2378
1735
'TIS I
1460
i isn
1355
12S5
1260
• ' ' " "" ' -|
Intimity
S
s
M
V,
M
u
W
W
M
W
• • -
V
Ajii!nm.nt Common
0-H scrac-h b^oad
C-H stretch, CH^SCHi
C'O
— _ on
CH-i bend
DEC*
C-0 stretch 0£G*
C-0 stretch
C^ -. r «
-'.' aCTi.C;!
1C 7 i
1060
920
900
>. j
M
W
W
\J . -1 ..._-__.
DEC*
DEC* shoulder
DEC*
*Diathylene glycol
Prtdomlnataly" di«ETiyiena jlycol with cwo caroonyl containing coQpocr.tid
probably aliphatic acid and aliphatic unaaturated eiter. The relative
of the saturated C-H banes Indicates :ha: scne aliphatic hydrocarbon i
which a
i r. t -j P. s 1 ;
6-44
-------
TABLE 6-40
IB REPORT
SAMPLE:
Unfractlonated SASS 1 urn •*• Filter Particulars Extract - Venturl Scrubber
Wrn Numktr
Urn'1)
3450
2950. 2920,
2895, 2885
1730
1650
1430
1355
1295
1130
1075
1055
920
<>QJ3
Inttntlry
S -
w
u
u
w
u
u
u
u
u
u
w
*Dl«thvlent ?lycol
Ajiignmtnt Commtnn
0-H «tr*tch broad
CH?, CM 3 •tretchai
OO ieretch
0-H H-,0
CH2 band
DEC*
C-0 »tr«tch
DEC
DEC
DEC
DEC shoulder
DEC
Dtethylane glycoi it ch* aa;or component. A anal I aiaocnt of a carbonyl containing
compound is preien:, but not id«ntiflable.
TABLE 6-41
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: Lc Fr»ctlon '.'1 of SASS lu •*• Filter Particulate Extract - Venturi Scrubber
Wm Numfetr
lem'1)
2960,2927,2858
1465
' '—'£
Inttmicy
S
"
-
Ajjignm.nl Commtnti
CH,, CH.. stretch
CH2 »tno
'.a, *«4
. i /'- 1
Ili2
1130
1041
970
901
600
*polychlorolr
a
V
M
W
M
M
M
. f luorocthy lene
n -\i •
?
-------
TABLE 6-42
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: Lc ?raccljrl ?2 of SASS 1 ua + Filter Particular Extract - Ver.turi S-:r. abL'
Wm Numb»f
icm'1)
Intttnitv
AiiiQnmMit
-J
Aliphatic CH and ester carbonyl at levels below tioraal background cont .IT. i r. .1 rioi.
IR REPOR
SAMPLE:
LC F
TABLE 6-43
SASS 1 -^n + Filter Parclculace Extract - Venc-
Wm Humlnf
(cm'1!
2955, 2380
2925, 2330
1735
1600
1460
1380 «
1265
1180
1110
1020
800
750
700
lnt«rr»ttv
S
s
M
w
M
U
U
W
w
w
M
w
w
Ani^nm«nt Comm»nri ]
CH7 stretch
CH^ scracch
C-0 stretch
C-C vcr*cch
CH btnd
CH3 bend ~ -"
C-0 stretch, Si-CH
" 1
Si-0
Si-0
arocaatic substitution, Si(CH^),
aromatic substitution, S1(CH ),
aromatic subscicution, SHCHJ., I
Pradomirucely aliphatic hydrocarbon, with some aliphatic eater anc ai-ocatlci:v as
wall as a snail *EOUHC of *ilicoti«. Intanaitias are just over ncrr,.il b«n~k?rciund.
G-4b
-------
TABLE 6-44
IR REPORT
«•„,.». c LC Fraction 04 of 1 am + Filter Particulate Extract - Venturl Scrubber
SAMPLE'. --
Wtv* Numk«
(«m-l)
2960,2927, 2852
1738
1460
1640
1380
1330. 1340
1150, 12bO
1170
1100
1045
1015
Intimity
S
M
M
M
W
V
W
W
U
W
U
Al*igflm*nt Comment!
CH,,, CH- stretch
OQ stretch
CH2 bend
shoulder
CK.J bend
-
C-0 itr»ecn. sl-iCHJ,
-
Si-0
-
Sl-0
Mainly aliphatic hydrocarbon with a carbonyl which is probably an aliphatic ester
and possibly a small quantity of sillcone compound. There is very little material
present over normal background.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE
TABLE 6-45
l|(5 °f 1 uo + Filter Particulat* Extract - Venturi Scrubber
Wr>* Numbw
(•»•')
2960,2927, 2352
1730
1600
1660
1380
1282
i:65
1165
1125
1075
1040
1015
310
Intimity
S
S
W
M
W
S
ill
W
M
M
V
V
U
Aitlgnmtnt Comminti
CH.J, CH3 stretch
C-0 stretch
C-C stretch, aromatic
CH? bead
CH^ bend
C-0 screech
0-0 *er«tch
-
phchelate
phthalate
phthelat*
•
**
Predominately phthalatt escec with another aromatic ester. Intensity of C-H bands
st^ggeats Chat the esters have a high aliphatic hydrocarbon concent.
6-47
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
TABLE 6-46
1C Fraction "6 of 1 us •*• Filter P.irtic'jlAte Extract - Vcn^iri Scr-jbbei
Wiw Numkir
(cm'1)
3370
2960, 2872
2921, 2855
1950
1730
1600
1460
1381
1358
1285
T255
:i:s
1075
920
900
310
742
Inttrolrr
S
s
S
W
s
W
M
W
W
5
S
S
s
s
s
W
M
710 | W
*Dlethyl|sne glycol
Ajiijnmtot Co mm HI ri
0-H stretch broad
CH, stretch
CH2 scratch
DEC *
C-0 stretch
C-C stretch aroiastic "
CH, b.nd 1
*•
CH., b«nd
DEC
|
C-0 stretch
C-0 stretch sn'.m! Ji5f "
DEC
DEC
DEC iihnuld*t
DEC
DEC
arocatic substitution
aromatic substitution
Diethylene glycol and aromatic ester, probably phthalare.
TABLE 6-47
IR RIPOHT
SAMPLE: LC Fraction • Filter Pirtlculjce Extract - Veacur
Wtr. Numk.f
(tm-1)
3350
2920, 2372, 2360
1950
1728
1460
1420
1 T • A
1 358
1325
1290
1230
1130
1080
1060
920
'.»00
dL5
•Di«chyl«n« glyjc
Intimity
S
S
W
M
M
W
M
U
U
W
s
s
s
M
M
W
:ol
Anignmtnt Commtfirt
0-H stretcli
CH,, CH1 str«tch. aliphatic
DEC* '
c-o •••
CH2 bend ~ — —
ck^ oena
-
C-0 str«tch
DEC ' —
DEC
DEG snoulder
DEC
DE(' shoulder
DEiJ
DEG
•n
Principally di«thyl«n« glycol. Thara is a snail .mount of .-ater present.
6-48
-------
TABLE 6-48
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: Unfractionated SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module Rinse - Venturi Scrubbar
Wtm Numk«f
Iff"'1)
3050
2965, 2935, 286C
17LO
1460
1420
1385
1285
1265
1100
1025
945
310
Intimity
M
S
S
M
W
U
M
M
M
W
U
M
Aitignmmt Comment!
0-H scratch broad
CHj, CH3 stretch
C-0 stretch
CH-> bend
0-H bind
CH, bend
C-0 tcretch (acid)
S1-(CH3)2
Sl-0
Si-0
0-H out of plane bend
Si-(CH1),
The major :onponenc Is i saturated aliphatic acid. A small amount of silicon*
compound is also present.
TABLE 6-49
IR REPORT
SAMPLE; 1C Fraction VI of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module Rinsa - Venturi Scrubber
WOT Numbtf
<«m'')
2955, 2925,2854
1738
1460
1380
1265
U25
1072
1028
965
310
722
Intimity
S
U
M
U
W
U
W
W
W
W
Aliignmtflt Cooimtnti
CHj, CH^ stretch
C-0 stretch
CH2 bend
CH., bend
C-0 stretch """ ~
^
-
-
-
-
-(CHj)n-
Principally aliphatic hydrocarbon. A small amount of aliphatic ester is present.
6-49
-------
TABLE 6-50
IH REPORT
SAMPLE: Lc Fraction it2 of SASS XAP-2 Extract + Module Rinse - Venturi Scrubber
Wm Numbtr
Aliphatic hydrocarbon *nd a rn 1 •••« j loxnne In
bjckround li!'-'*lt.
o1 ru- <> 11 : nt .
in REPORT TABLE 6-51
SAMPLE: Fraction 3 of SASS XAD- 2 Exeracc *• Module Rinse - Venturi Scrubber
W>w Numbtr
(em'1)
2961, 2925, 2352
1950
1735
1632
1600
1460
1418
1380
1265
1098
1022
866
802
705
Intimity
S
w
S
M
W
M
W
H
S
S
i
M
S
M
Ai.ijnm.ot Commwin
CH,, CH^ stretch
C-0 stretch
C'C scratch ""
C-C itretoh "
CH2 b«nii -
silicone compound
CH^ bend
St-CH " -—
i 1—0 ' '
5i~O
St-(CH3)2 b^ad shoaldar
SiO(CH ) bend
arooacic substiciuion
Predomlnatsly ailicone conpound with some aronatic ester. The intensity or C'i
suggests a high allphacic hydrocarbon contene, probably as part of ch>? ester'
G-iO
-------
,R«PO«T TABU 6-52
SAMPLE: LC Fraction #4 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module Rinse - Venturi Scrubber
Wn* Numk.f
(tm''|
2960.2927, 2858
1735
1640
1605, 1580
1555
1460
1375
1268
1177
lilD
1022
800
707
Inmniry
S
S
M
W
V
M
W
S
W
M
M
M
M
Anlgnmvnt GammMin
CHi. 083 scratch
C-0 scratch
-
C-C screech
-
CH, bend
ik
CH, bund
C-0 strntiih
aromatic estor
Si-o — '
Sl-0
S1-(CH3),
aromatic substitution
Silicon* compound and an aromatic eater with high aliphatic content are the aajor
A small amount of « chlrd compon«nc la prtfimnt, which may be a salt.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
TABLE 6-53
LC Fraction 05 of SASS XAD-2 Extract •*• Module Rinse - Vencuri Scrubber
Wrw Numktr
lim'1)
I960, 2925, 2855
1735
1633
1605
1560
1460
1375
1265
1168
1115
noo
1013
1020
800
710
Inttmlry
S
S
W
W
W
M
W
M
U
W
W
W
W
M
M
Ajtignmmt Commtnti
CH,, CH.. stretch
C-0 *tr«tch, *it«r
-
C-C
-
CH, bend
CH3 bend
C-0 »tretch +• 'iUCH \) ,
*romatlc «
-------
IR REPORT TABLE 6-54
SAMPLE: Lc Fraction >>6 of SASS .XAD-2 Extract + Module Rinse - Ve-.'.uri Scrubber
Wm Numktr
tim'1!
2960, 2835
2923, 2853
2500-3200
1705
1610
1*60
1418
1288
1180
1072
1030
940
800
718
Inumlrv
5
S
M
S
w
M
M
M
W
W
W
W
u
M
Aj.lgnm.nt Commit.
CH., stretch shoulders
CH, stretch
OH screech, acid verv broad
C-0 stretch, acid
OC stretch, aromatic
CH, bend
OH bend, acid
C-0 stretch
C-0 stretch j
- • •• —
—
OH bend "
aromatic substitution
-(CH,)n-
Predominately long chain saturated aliphatic acid. A small amount of .iror-a'tic,
probably ester, Is present.
TABLt" 6-55
SAMPLE: Fraction
-------
SAMPLE: Unfractioned Extract at SASS Conden«4C« - Venturl Scrubber
Win Numbtr
(ern'M
2960. 2930,
2890, 2858
1730
1720
1610
1465
1335
1290
1270
1205
1100
10 JO
610
Inttmlry
S
M
M
V
M
W
M
M
W
W
W
M
Aiiignrptnl Commrtm
CH,, CH, stretch
C"0 stretch
C-0 stretch shoulder
C-C aromatic
CH2 bend
CH3 bend
C-0 ttretch
S1-CH3
C-0 atretch
Sl-0 stretch
Si-0 stretch
S1-(CH,)? stretch
Tuo carbonyl containing compounds are present, an escer and most likely an acid.
Intensity of the CH bands indicates aliphatic hydrocarbon. There is also a very
snail amount of silicone compound present.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
TABLE 6-57
L'nfractionated Extract of SASS Filter - Oxidation Tank Vent
Wnv Mumltr
w't
JJISO
•J15, :rt?s. :.s»:
1950
1730
1462
1420
1 ISO
1355
1280
1 "> 7(1
1125
1075
1065
920
900
740
Intimity
3
J
W
S
M
W
Dltchvl«nt alvcol
Aftlfnmtnt
(>-H Stretch
CommMiti
broad
CH;, CH} Stv«t.ch
DEC*
broad
C-0 stretch
CH2 bend
CHi bend
CHi
DEC*
C-0 «tretct\
C-0 *tr«rc:h
shoulder
DEC*
DEC*
shoulder
DEC*
DEC*
shoulder
DEC*
-(CH2)n-
PreJouxinjctly Ji«thyl«n« glycol. A carbonyl containing compound
is probably unsaturated aliphatic ««ter.
Is present which
6-53
-------
TABLE 6-58
IR REPORT
tintraccloned SASS XAD-2 Extract and Module Ririae - Oxiiacion lark VP"-
SAMPLE:
Wru Numbtr
(cm'1)
3150
i960, 2925, 285:
1710
1460
1420
1 380
i:ao
12ISO
1100
1025
aio
Inttmity
U
s
5
M
U
W
w
M
M
W
M
Aj»ignm»«t Commmrs 1
j
0-H scratch broad
CH2, CHj stretch
OO screech
-K-> bend
, k _
OH b«nd
CH3 bond
C-0 itr*t,:li
J1-CH3 atri-rch
Si-0 screech
Sl-0
Si-(CH3)2
Ciy 3atur.scea alipnacic acid wicn a small quar.c^cy of silicons ccnpound.
TABLE 6-59
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 1C Fractional of SASS XAO-2 Extract •*- Module Rir.se - Oxidacioii '-:
Wm Numt«r
(tm'1)
2953, :?: 7. ^353
1465
1380
1200
972
727
*Pol.vchlorocri!!
tnttmlry
j
M
W
W
w
U
Luoroothy l«n«
Ajlignm.nl Comm^irj
CH^, Cth stretch
CH^ bend
CK3 bend
PCFE*
PCFE
-(CH2)n-
Aliphacic hydroc«rbon with a v«ry snail ar-.oi-int of polvchlora: ri £ lucre e ch
-------
SAMPLE; L<- Fraction H2 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent
Wm Numkir
(em*1)
2952, 2925. 2855
1740
1600
1460
U80
Uo:
1100
1030
802
Inumlry
S
U
U
M
U
U
w
w
w
AnignmMit Commtnn
CH,. CH1 •treteh
C«0 «tr«tch
C»C itretch
CH, bend
CH beml
Si- (CM.), ™
J «.
Si-0
Si-0
si-(CH3)2
Predoninately aliphatic hydrocarbon with small quantities of ester and silicons
compound(s1. Arotnaticity is evident somewhere in :he system.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
LC Fraction
TABLE 6-61
of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent
Wm Numttr
(cm'1)
2965, 2927.2859
1738
1628
1600
1459
1380
1265
1044
1025
870
804
703
InttmJev
S
S
M
M
S
M
S
S
S
M
S
M
Aiiijomtnt Comintfltl
CH,, CH^ stretch
C»0 scr«tch
C-0 icrttch
C-C «tretch
CH, bead
CH3 b«nd
C-0 ftratch
Si-0
St-0
St-{CHA) t
Sl-tCH,),
• romatic subiticutior.
Jilicone compound with some aromatic «scer and aliphatic hydrocarbon (which)
may be at lease in part on the ester). There is a fourth component which may be a salt.
-------
REPORT 6-62
SAMPLE: LC Fraction f/4 of SASS XAI>-2 Extract + Module Rinse - Oxidation Tank. Vent
Wtr» Numbir
, 2926,2855
InttniltY
Ajtignmtnl
CH.,, CH. stretch
1736
C-0 stretch
1600
1*60
1 33H
1175
OC stretch
CH. bnnd
CH b*nd
SL- (Cll i .,
0-0
1110
Si-0
1021
Si-0
870
300
Si-(CH3)3
710
aromatic substitution
Aromatic ester with b.igh aliphatic hydrocarbrn ccr.ten:
conpoand.
Also cor.tJins
IB REPORT
SAMPLE:
TABLE 6-63
Fraction 'US o£ SASS 1CAEH2 Extract - Module Sinae - Oxi-jjcion Tank V
VYm Nvmkir
(em'1]
2960,2923, 2359
1741
1608
1460
1380
1265
1 170
1115
1025
"300
715
Intirnlry
S
s
w
S
M
M
M
W
W
M
W
Allignrrvnt Cornm»nti
CH.,. CH1 atrttch
C-0 stretch
C-C stretch
CH bend
CH bend
C-0 stretch, si-CH,
iromntLi: ''stnf
ari?matic «jc
-------
IR REPORT TABLE 6-64
Fraction "6 of SASS XAD-2 Extract •*• Mouu It _ Rinse - 0-xid«tlon Tank. Vent
Wrn Numkir
IcnT'l
2500-3500
2960, 2930, 2855
1735
1702
1610
1460
1418
138i
13.'0
1283
1260
11 HO
11 JO
in:1}
10J8
940
800
718
Intintltv
M
S
S
S
W
M
M
W
W
S
M
W
U
W
W
W
W
S
"""""""
0-H stretch
CH?, CH^ stretch
C-0 stretch, ester
C-0 stretch, acid
C-C stretch
CH, bend
OH. acid
CH. bend
-
C-0 stretch
C-0 stretch
-
-
-
-
OH acid
Sl-CH,
aromatic substitution
Commwin
very broad
shoulder
shoulder
Mainly saturated aliphatic acid with an aromatic ester, probably benzoate, and a
trace of silicons compound.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
TABLE 6-65
LC Fraction #7 of SASS XAD-2 Extract •»• Module Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent
Wm N«m».r
(IDT1)
3300
2960, 2923, 2355
1736
1595
1J65
1459
1412
1378
1280
L2S5
1170
1113
1090
920
722
Intimity
M
S
U
W
W
W
W
W
W
M
M
W
W
Aj*lgnm*nt
Cornintnn
OH stretch "
CH-, CH. stretch —
C-0 «-c«tch
-
CH., bund
CH., bend
C-0 stretch
-
—
shoulder
tcher C-0
shoulder
-
-(CH,)n-
Aliphatic ester and aliphatic eeher with at least one other constituent.
6-57
-------
1R REPORT
SAMPLE:
TABLE 6-66
L'nfractionated Extract of SASS Condensate - Oxidation Tank Vent
Wm Numbif
(cm"')
2963, 2930,
2890. 2362
1735
1715
1650
1470
1380
i:95
1270
1100
1030
310
Imtmltv
S
W
W
W
M
U
W
W
W
U
W
AjlijnntMIt Common
1
!
CH,, CH, screech ~j
C"0 str«tch !
C-0 »tretch
C-C stretch
CH, bind
CH., bend
C-0 stretch
Si-CH3, C-0
Si-0
Sl-0
Si-(CH3)2 |
Predominately aliphatic hydrocarbon. Small anounts of 2 carbonyl containing
compounds, one of which could be an aromatic ester, and silicone compounds.
REPORT
SAMPLE:
TABLE 6-67
Unfractionatad SASS Probe and Cyclone Rinse - TCA Scrubber
Wtn Numbir
tem'1)
2960, 2880
2925, 2855
1740
1650
uro
1380
725
lltphaclc hydro
Inumlty
S
S
U
U
M
U
U
_ -
^trbiin with * ama
Aj»'gom»nt Comm»or\
CH1 stretch
CH stretch
C-0
C-C
CH bend
CH, b«nd
-(CH,)n-
11 aaount ot *»c«.-.
6-58
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
TABLE 6-6H
Unfractlonated Extract of SASS 10
3 urn Participates - TCA Scrubber
W«w Numtir
(cm'1)
IJnO
2920. 2850
2873
1940
1 730
i7i:
1460
i-i:o
1.180
1355
1265
1240
1125
1080
1060
•JJO
900
815
738
Intimity
S
S
S
w
M
M
M
W
W
W
u
w
S
S
S
M
M
W
M
*Diethylene glyjcol
Ajtignmtnt
0-H stretch
Commtnti
drond
CH., stretch
CH., stretch
DEC*
C-0 stretch
broad
shoulder
OO stretch
CH, band
OH bend
CH., bend
DEC
DEC
DEC
C-0
C-0
DF.G
DEC
Shoulder
DEC
DEC
Hhouldtr
DEC
-(CH2>n-
Principally diethylene glycol, soae unsaturated ester and saturated aliphatic acid.
TABLE 6-69
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
Unfr*ctlonjic*ti Extract of SASS 1 ura +• Fllt«r Partioulaton - TX.\ Scr
Wm Numkir
(on'1)
3450
2950, 2880
2920, 2855
1730
1720
1460
1420
1380
1355
i:33
i:65
11:5
1070
910
* Dl«thyl«n« g
Intimity
S
S
S
S
S
M
U
w
w
w
u
M
M
M
ycol
Aitignmtnt
0-H jtrecch
CH, »tr«toh
CH, itr«tch
Coinmtfin
broad
C«0 scratch
C-0 stretch
shoulder
CH2 bend
OH bend
CH, bend
DEC*
C-0
C-0
DEC
DEC
DEC
A mixture of diethylene glycol «nd two carbonyl containing compound* which «r«
probably «n acid and on 4seer.
P 6-59
-------
TABLE 6-7°
SAMPLE: Fraction/ ]. oj SASS 1 'jra Cyclone 4- Filter Extract - TCA Scrubber
Wm Numbir
(m'1)
2955, 29:8. J857
1750
1465
1360
1202
u:e
-To
900
':s . J
1
*Polvchlorocri!
Innnilty
S
W
M
W
W
W
W
W
W
fLuorcusthvlane
Ajiijnmwu Comm»nn
CH^. CH scr«cch
C"0 stretch
CH, bend
CH bend ' ~" "
PCFE*
PCFE - - - — 1
PCFE -' ~~ — ' —
PCFE
-(CH,)n-
j
Principally aliphatic hv j ro>:« rbon , wl-.i, a ,M11 inc.mc of polvchlcr--
m REPORT TABLE 6-71
SAMPLE: LC Fr.ictlon *l of I .-.m •» Ftlcir PartiCkLlit* Extract - TCA lie-rubber
Wra Numfcir
(•«•')
Inttntlty
Anignm^nt Commtnr)
Aliphatic hydrocarbon and oarbonyj. jc l«v«U approxiaat lajj nornal b
6-60
-------
TABLE 6-72
I PI REPORT
SAMPLE: 1C Fraction tf3 of SASS 1 urn + Filter Extract - TCA Scrubber
Wrr» Numtif
(tm''l
!961, 2925.2852
1735
1600
1460
1180
126:
1100
I0i5
Wi
Intimity
S
M
M
M
V
S
S
S
S
Altignmtnt Comments
CH,, CH^ Stretch
C-0 screech
C-C stretch
CH, bend
-
S1-(CH,>,
J *-
Sl-0
Sl-0
S1-ICH3>2
Principally silicon* compounds. There are also carbonyl and aliphatic hydrocarbon
In Che system as well as significant arotoacicitv.
in REPORT
SAMPLE: LC Friction
TABLE 6-73
of SASS 1 urn Cvclone •*• Filter Extract - TCA Scrubber
Wm Nwmktr
(wi'M
!924. i385. 235)
1730
1462
1380
1261
1172
1105
lnt*miry
•j
M
M
U
W
w
r ff"
Altignrnxtt Cofnmxin
CH,, CH( •cratch
C-0 scr«tch
CH2 bend
CH3 bend
C-0 stretch
•"
"
A carbonyl containing compound with high aliphatic hydrocarbon content.
Intensities are barely above normal background.
6-61
-------
,RREPORT TABLE 6-74
SAMPLE: LC Fraction J5_of SASS 1 ua Cyclone Filter Extract - TCA Scrubber
Wtv* Numbi'
(em'1!
2960, 29:3, 2852
1732
1600
1460
1380
1230
126S
lloO. 1172
1120
1075
1030
Inttmtry
S
S
w
M
W
M
M
U
U
U
U
Ajiignmtnl Commmn
CH,, CH., stretch
OO screech
C-C stretch
CH, bend
CH3 bend
C-0 stretch
C-0 screech
-
ph thalate
phthalace
phthalate
1
An e«c«r. pr-ibablv phthala::.!. wi:h hla'.i aliphatic hyri r>:a rbon .-.ont
S
w
'*
W
9U | M
^1
•W
'-2
706
655
U
w
M
W
w
A»i,^.nt Common
OH stretch broad
aromatic CH stretch
CH,, CH., stretch
C"0 stretch
C»C stretch, aromatic
C"C stretch, aromatic
CH, b«r\d
CH, bend
C-0 stretch
C-0 itrecoh shoulder
phthalac* «nt»r
phthclat*
-------
IB REPORT
SAMPUl:
TABLE 6-76
Unfr.ctlon.e-d SASS XAD-2 Extract
Module Kin«« - TCA Serubb.r
Wm Numkif
(m'*\
3450
2960, 2880
2927, 2856
1730
1708
1610
1610
1<*60
1420
1370
1285
1270
1130
1115
1075
1030
910
Intimity
S
s
S
s
s
w
u
M
U
w
M
M
W
U
u
w
w
Alignment Comm.nl>
OH screech broad
CH, stretch shoulder
CH,, stretch
C-0 snouioer
C"0
C"C
c-c
CH, b«nd
OH bund
CH^ bend
C-0
C-0 shoulder
-
-
-
-
0-H bend, acid
Mainly saturated alipnatic acid, with possibly some sster and alipnacic aiconoi.
,R REPORT TABLE 6-77
«AM.. »• f( .;L fr.rflon ''1 of SASS XAD- 2 F.xtra-Jt
" TCA Serubb.r
W«n Nunkw
dm''*
2956, 2856
2926
1459
13H2
1260
1196
1150
1127
1104
i6io
963
496
413
725
-5?0
520
kPol/chlorocrii
Imtmlty
M
S
W
w
w
w
w
w
u
w
w
u
u
u
. w
w
luoro.thyl«n.
Ajiignmtnt Comminti
CH7, CH^ sertcch
CH2 b«nd
CH3 bend
PCFE*
PCFE
PCFE
PCFE
PCFE
fCFE " Sr^ia
PCFE
PCFE
-
-
PCFE
-.
Predominately aliphatic hydrocarbon with a small amount of polychlorotrifluoroechylene.
6-63
-------
REPORT TABLE 6-78
Win Numbir
(em''l
2950, 2856
2926
1745
1629
1459
1374
125S
1020
815
Intemiry
M
S
u
V
w
u
w
w
M
Anlgnnwnt Commvro I
CH,, CH stretch
C-0 stretch
C-C stretch
CH, band
CH, b«nd
C-0 scratch
_ "1
1
' ' _..,,..•«,.- ^ i , .,_ _— . . „ . „.. -_„,.. ,. „ .,._ „. __._ |
Aliphatic hydroo..nrt>en with i sn.iU quantity of 2 carbonvl containing compounds which nav b-
acld And C «tr«tch
-
CH^ bmij
CM. b«nd
St-(CH3),
Si-0
Sl-0
Si-(CH1)1
St-CCHj),
aromatic subacitutton
aromatic substitution
Largely silicons c.ompour.dCa) . Thar* Is both ,?rcaar.ic ind aliphatic character ir. the
syst«u ae wall as a *malJ araounc of carbonyl containing compound, probably in aliphatic
• 9t«r.
6-64
-------
,R REPORT
SAMPLt : 1C Fraction
TABLE 6-80
of SASS XAD-2 Excra.cc + Modal* Rin«« - TCA Scrubber
Wm Numktr
(im%'l
29.10. 2856
292e
1737
1636
1606
1559
1459
1374
1266
1171
1112
1027
903
801
757
710
Inumlrr
M
S
M
W
w
u
w
w
w
w
u
u
w
w
w
w
Alilgnmtnt Comment!
CH,, OH, » t retch
C-0 screech
C-C screech
CH2 bend
CH3 bend
C-0 stiecch
—
Sl-0
Si-0
Sl-CH^
aromatic substitution
Saturated aliphatic escer and »n aromatic compound with son* silicons compound(s) .
is *n unidentified coaponenC seen in the bands «C 1559 and 1636
m REPORT TABLE 6-81
SAMPLE: LC Fracclon *5 of SASS XAD-2 Extrace + Module Rinse - TCA Scrubber
There
Wrr. NuffltM
(tm-'l
2950, 2856
2924
1729
1636
1606
1559
1490
1459
1374
1274
1173
rraj
ILI'2
1073
1050
1027
980
802
756
710
417
Intimity
M
S
M
W
U
W
w
w
w
M
\i
W
u
fc/
"fl
w
w
Ai.lsntn.nt Commtnn
CH2, CH3 stretch
C-0, escer
acid sale
C-C
acid sale
shoulder
CH, bead
CH. bend
C-0 screech
aromatic «*car
aromatic eseer "
aromatic escer
Aromaeio escer
•
—
^
aromatic substitution
-
High degrea of aliphatic character wtch an aromatic ester, likely a benzoaee, and
another unidentified component indicated by band* In the 1500-1700 cm~l region.
6-65
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: l
TABLE (\-m
v'6 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module Rinse - TCA Scrubber
Wtw Numbtr
Inn'1)
2955, :356
2926
2500-3200
1730
1706
1606
1559
1459
1-13
138J
1231
1173
1119
1073
1027
942
865
795
710
648
lnt»mlry
M
S
w
M
M
W
M
M
W
L»
M
W
W
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
J
1
_._ _ .. ._i
Aiiijnm»nl Common
CH,,, CH^ stretch
acid OH scratch very broad
C-0 stretch, ester
C-0 stretch, acid
C-C stretch
-
CH, bend
CH b«nd
C-O s crotch
phthalate —
phthalace
-]
OH bend, acid
-
-
aromatic substitution
—
i
— - -
Aliphatic acid .irid phchalaca «at.;r wtth .1 ai;.,;r third component.
6-6(>
-------
TABLE 6-83
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: LC Fraction i>7 of SASS XAD-2 Extract + Module Rinse - TCA Scrubber
Win NvmkM
tew'1 1
3:50
3064
2969. 2BS6
2926
2300
1730
1706
1606
1533, 1567
1431
1413
1380
1320
1231
1230
L173 "1
L112
1073
L027
940
919
865
795
718
687
648
533
Inumlty
W
w
B
s
U
s
s
M
W
M
M
M
U
M
M
W
M
M
U
W
U
w
U
M
U
w
w
Aliignmtnt Comment*
O-H scratch broad
CH stretch, aroraatlc
CH,, CH^ »cr«tch. aliphatic
•eld OH broad
OO scratch. *»t«r
C»0 »tr«tch
C-C atracoh
C-C atrocch
CH, band
OH bead, acid
CH^ band
C-0 stratch
C-0 scratch shoulder
-
phchalat*
phchalace
phthalate
&cld OH
_
.
-
aromatic aubactcuclon
-
-
-
Aliphatic acid and aliphatic «scar with a small amount of phchalatc ester.
6-67
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:,
i Am i (>--M
Un£r*ctlou«t«d Extract of SASS ConJ»n»«t« - UIA Soi-nbb«r
W»n Numkir
Itrn'1)
296$, 2890
2930, 2360
1740
1610
1470
1335
1290
1270
730
Inttnilty
S
s
M
W
w
W
w
w
w
Aftlgnrntnt Gortimtnti
CH- stretch »hould«r
CH, stretch
C~0 screech
C-C
CH2 bend
CH bend
C-0
C-0
__:(CVrT
Aliphatic hydrocarbon with sone un s a t ur~a t e d ester and perhaps sor.e other carbonyl
containing compound
.RRIPORT TABLE 6-85
S AMPLE: Unfr^ctlonattd Extract of V«ntiirt Filter Ca
Wm Hymk.r
(tm'()
2925, :855
1733
1710
1460
1420
1380
1280
1250
1120
1080
725
Intimltv
S
M
S
M
W
U
W
w
w
w
U
Alllgnmtnt Comm.nt-j
CH7 stretch
C-0 stretch, estar shoulder
C-0 strutch, acid
CH, bend
OH bend, acid
CH bend
C-0 »cracch
C-0 screech shoulder
—
-
-(CHJn-
Pr«domin«c«ly atiphaclc liyjrocarbon with »oo« («.*c«r and Held. Sm,i i L amount '>f,-'irii
constituent also pr»s«nc, sean by thn «ha(i« of tho bands (rim 1100 co 1300 cm
mMiPORT TABI.F 6-H6
SAMPLE LC Fracclon tfl of Venturl Filtar Cak» Extract
VYrn Numbtr
(cm'1)
2956, 2856
2926
14
1333
12iS
1096
10:?
SO J
417
Intimity
M
S
W
U
w
w
w
w
U
Ajiifinmtnt Comm»nt»
CH,. CH, stretch
^ ._j — — . —
CH. bend
CH., b«nd
51-CH.j
Sl-0
st-o
S i - CH .,
-
Al1ph«tU- !ivdroc»rt)on with some sllic^no comp
fa-68
-------
IR REPORT
SAMPLt:
TABLE 6-87
LC Fraction '12 of Venturi Scrubber Filter Cake Extract
Witt Niimbir
(•»•'>
2856, 2956
2926
1745
1459
1374
1.266
1011
741
702
610
575
Intimity
H
S
V
(t
V
w
w
w
U
W
W
Alilgnmtnt Commtnti
CH?. CH1 stretch
c-o
CH, bend
CH^ band
C-O scratch
aromatic lubactcuclon
iromaclc substitution
Aliphatic hydrocarbon and ««curac«d «»c«r at l«v«la approximating noraal background.
TABLE 6-88
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: LC fraction <*3 of Vancuri Fllttr Cak« Extract
Wm Nymb.f
lem'l
2955. 28J6
2926
1735
1697
1649
15:0
1460
1370
i:sn
1020
860
810
750
670
Intimity
H
S
W
w
u
w
w
u
w
w
w
u
w
Ajiignmmt Commmti
CH2. CH-j stretch
C-O stretch
—
—
-
CH2 bend
CH3 bend
C-O stretch
—
"*
-
-
Aliphatic ester and at least one other unidentified compound.
-------
•KKEPORT TABLE 6-89
SAMPLE: LC_Fr.iccion -'M of Vanturi Ftlear Cake Extract
Wm Numbtt
(cm
•li
lnt«mity
?955, 2924, 285«
1738
CH,, CHV screech
1.710
1657
OO screech
C"0 screech
16C
1535
1460
1375
.262
L"C, aromatic
CH, bund
b«nd
C-0
_.
1173
1112
C-0
1027
725
-(CHi)n-
Prtmarliy allphacic hydrocarbon. Some aromatic escer and acid as veil as & ainor
:ooiponenc seen In che bands at 1657 and 15 J5.
6-90
SAMPLE: _ 1C Friction 05 of v«neurl FtlCtr Cak« Excrtcc
Wrra Numbtr
low'1)
29?0, 2926,2852
1732
1653
1600
1452
1330
13*0
Llbl
.124
1100
1075
1039
744
615
InttmJry
S
S
w
M
U
W
M
U
W
w
w
w
w
w
Alii8nm»nt Commit,
CH,, CH5 »cr«cch
C-0 scr«tch, ester
C»C scratch, aromatic
CH bend ~~
CH.. bend "'
-
C-0 stretch. ~~ —
phchal«te cit«r
phthalate escer
phehalate ester "~
-
-
Phehalate esc«-r wtch high aliphaelc hydrocarbon content and anocher unluencifled component
6-70
-------
TABLE 6-91
IRREPORT
SAMPLE: 1C Fraction 06 of Venturl Filter Cake Extract
Wn« Numkw
CH-j b«nd
C»0 «sc«r
C-0 «cid
CH, b«nd
-
CK} b«nd
C-0 *cr«tch
™
>-
-
-
-
Aliphacic acid and aliphatic aster and a Qiaor third cotapor.ent.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
TABLE 6-92
LC Fraction #7 of Varicurl Fitltr C*k« Extract
Wm Numkw
(«•')
2955, 2a56
2825
1730
1715
1465
1385
1260
1250
1175
1110
72-
Initntlty
M
S
M
M
W
w
U
W
w
w
w
Aitignmtnt Coflimtnn
CH2, CH3 stretch
C-0 «tr«tch
C-0 stretch
CU2 bend
C-0 »trtech
C-0 stretch
-
ether
-
-------
TABLE 6-93
IR REPORT
Unf racclonated Extract ot" Venturi 5pray Tower Slurrv
SAMPLE:
Wm Numb.f
(cm'1)
3500
2960, 2930, 2353
1739
1720
1A85
1380
1280
iMtmltY
M
S
M
H
M
V
V
1260 I W
1170
1030
1065
935
w
w
w
w
740 1 V
Aitignm«it Ccmm»ntj
OH 1
CH,, CH] jtr«cch
C"0
c-o
CH, bend
CH b«nd
C-O itrtcch
C-O atratch
—
-
-
OH band
-
Mainly aliphatic hydrocarbon with son* olai!inic ester and acid, posstbly adtpic.
,R REPORT TABLE 6-94
SAMPLE: ^ Fraction <)l of Vencuri Spr»v Towar Slurry Extract
Wm Numttr
(em'1)
2956
2926
2856
1459
1374
1158
965
726
Initmlry
S
S
S
M
W
w
w
w
Aj«ljnm«n« Comm»nt>
CH,, CH.,
CH2 bend
CH b«nd
C-(CH3)2
-CH-CH-
-(CH,)n-
Aliphatic hydrocarbon with some long chain character. There is evidence for a slight
amount of unsaturatloru
TABLE 6-95
LC Fraction '/2 of Vencuri iprav Tower Siurrv Extract
SAMPLI: '
Wm Nufflbtr
lem'1)
2953, 2922,2850
1460
1381
1370
Intimity
S
M
W
W
Ajiigrtmtnt Commtnn
CH?, CH-) strecch
CH, bend
-- •*•
CH-j b«nd
CH3 bond
|
Aliphatic hydrocarbon, nUjhcly above norasl b
ch* pr«s«r.c« of gem dimethyl or eerc-bueyl end group*.
6-72
-------
IR REPORT
TABLE 6-96
LC Frasttpn »3 of Veneuri Spray Tower Slurry Extract
Wm Numbtr
(a."1)
1955. 2925. 2855
1735
1605
U59
1 .130, I )oO
U95
1:30
1270
1209
U40
1099
1080
1052
1041
1022
944
878
850
808
75:
701
lnt«mlty
S
u
V
MS
MS
W
w
W
w
V
w
w
w
u
w
u
w
w
M
u
w
Attignmtnt Commtnn
CH->, CH-> screech
C"0 ttretch, ester
C-C stretch, aromatic
CH, bend
CH3 band
C-0 stretch
C-0 stretch
S1-CH3 shoulder
St-0
shoulder
St-0
—
S1-(CH,H
-
Sl-(CH-)5;, «ronmii: iub«c t tut inn
aromatic substitution
aromatic substitution
Predominately aliphatic In 'haractr-r with *t lea^t one ester and significant aromaticity
in the system. Slllcone compounds ars also apparent.
6-73
-------
TAULL 6-'37
Ifl REPORT
SAMPLE: LC Fraction <4 of Venturl Spray Tower Slurrv Extract
ffm Ntimkir
(mi'')
2950, 2925, 2352
1734
1715
1605
1590
1495
1380, L.170
U'JJ
l.^ftO
i:«5
ui2
1030
1052
1028
880
309
750
728
705
InttmitY
S
M
W
w
W
M
U
W
W
U
W
W
W
U
W
W
W
M
W
•
Aiiignmtnl Commmtj
CH2.CH3 stretch
C-0 stretch, acid
C-0 screech, escer
C-C stretch, aromatic
C-C stretch, aromatic ~
CH, bend
CH b»nrf ""
0-0 «t. r»c> li
OO utrotch ilvmiiln
-
-
-
-
1
^ l~l
-
-
L«r?« degree of aliphatic character with an ironuclc ester and a saturated aliph.it
6-74
-------
TABLE 6-98
mREPORT
SAMPLE; LC Fraction 05 of Venturi Spray Tower Slurry Extract
Wm Nvmk«
(em'1)
2952, 2923. 2854
1735
1710
1600
1459
1330
17 TO"
1280
1260
1245
1160
1110
873
752
700
Intimity
S
M
M
w
M
W
-*_ .
U
u
W
W
u
W
W
u
Ajiignmtnt Commmts
CHj, CH^ screech
c-o
C.Q shoulder
C-C, aronuif. Ic
CH, bend
>.
CH. bend
O? "biimi thon 1 or r
C-O strtcch shoulder
C-O scratch shoulder
shoulder
-
-
ircnuicic subictrutlon
acomatlc substitution
High degree of aliphatic character with an aromatic ester. Only a small amount of
material is present.
TABLE 6-99
m REPORT
SAMPLi: 1C Fr.»octon •'.'(> of Vaneurl ._ Spray T^u-ti: Slurrv E
W«*< Numkw
(cm'1)
2956. 2856
2933
1737
1644
1598
1532
1459
1J82
1231
llt-6
1127
107)
1027
741
702
Intimity
M
S
S
U
W
W
W
W
M
W
W
U
U
W
u
Alllgnmtnt Commann
CH,, CH, stretch
C«0, stretch
-
C«C stretch
—
CH., band
CHj bend
C-O jtrftoh
-
phthnUCit «*t«r
phthlicc ««c«r
-
-
Predominately aliphatic e»ter with some phthalace ester, as veil as a small amount of a
third unidentified component.
6-75
-------
TABI r 6-100
IR RJFOfU
SAMPLE: LC Fraction
-------
SAMPLE:.
TABLE 6-102
LRMS REPORT
LC Fractions 6 & 7 of SASS 1 \im + Filter Participate Extract - Venturi Scrubber
Categories
Intensity
100
•
Category " MW Range
esters
Sut^Categoriei, Specific Compounds
Intensity
100
100
"
"
1
"
~~
"
•
" ~~
""^
"
Category
Dibutylphthalate
Dimethlyphthalane
•
.
m/e
278
194
Composition
C16H22°4
CinHmO*
•
Oth«r
6-77
-------
MG REPORT TABLE 6-103
A.VIPLF- LC Fraction 6 & 7 of SAGS XAD-2 4- Modulo Rinse - Vonturl Scrubbor
Esters, aliphatic
i*!, Specific Compounds
Intinsiry
Cat-^ory
pentadecanoaic acid, methyl ester
heptadecanoaic acid, raiathyl ester
'
tn/»
256
284
Co I7i;;o'.i l';on
i
C16H32°2
C15H36°2
Other
6-78
-------
LRMS REPORT TABLE 6_m
SAMPLE; LC Fractions 6 & 7 of SASS XAI>-2 + Module Rinse - Oxidation Tank Vent
Major Categories
Intensity
100
Category
esters
MW Range
Sub-Categories, Specific Compound*
Intensity
10
10
10
Other
Category
methyl pentadecanoate
methyl hcptadeqanoate'
methyl octadecanoate
m/e
284
298
Composition
C18H36°2
C19H38°2
6-79
-------
LRMS RiiPORT TABLE 6-1 OS
SAMPLE: LC Fractions 6 & 7 of SASS 1 um + Filter Particulate Extract: - TCA Scrubbei
Vljjor Categories
Intenjity
100
•
Category
esters
NTW Range
_
SutvCategoritj, Specific Compound!
Intensity
100
10
Category
dibutylphthalate
methyl hcptadecanoate
m/e
278
28A
Composition
C1.H77°A
C1ftH^°,
•
j
_.
Other
-------
LRMS REPORT
f
SAMPLE:
LC Fractions 6 & 7 of Vcnturi Spray Tower Slurry Extract
Major Categories
Intensity
100
•
Category NiW Range
esters
Sub-Categorin, Specific Compounds :
Intensity
-
Category
•
m/e
Composition
•
Oth-
6-81
-------
TABLE 6-107. SASS SAMPLING DATA SHEETS
"*•* Shatmftfl 5taam D1 *
n«i. January 29 & 30, T979
Simpi;*] Ltxitie* Venturl Scrubber Outlet
Souicil.D SSP
n .1 t(f C ^
Iiuh Utimeef IJiJ-j
flptnicf J. Howes & 0. Kohlpr
Amkical Ttmptiiimt 36 F
Diiancliic P.emii. 30.26 in Ha
suiuffciujci (Pc) -33.5 in H^O
f;iu,u-^H,»SiSP-l. 7. 8.9. 10. 11. 12. & 13
(8 filters)
LEAK CHECKS
Pretest: An) lent leap.
0.00? cfm 8-20"
AOOF
0.005 cfm g_20"
Post test : AOOF
.()(}£ Ctm c-20
rnkciMfik^Trr* -36".. -.31 6 <;<;
U«rrd 1 n Oi50 ^n
A«if«4U>kl« « 13
•ll/y) n\ o
XAD-2 Mtdttlv BBW^» 4iiAl-uio
u....!..!!.-.^, BCL 33937 n««w.,«,i«r 3070-022
u-M A.I 1 •" in H,0
r F-I./
410 F
n-. «,ui- 410 F
% C *-. 11 t\
f^*i»ff f^f ^ A ^ i . o i n n^u
L
Crfr«4«if«i*i tft^ R*f »** CWchftrf fty
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POIMT LAYOUT
HEAD AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY L-L.MIMUTES
CO
fNi
i*«mit
r«ul
will
u:«
»ilM'(
"X. ,ft-3 JS.,
^XCST
***m«< ^x.
!!•<.«« ^^^
0
15
30
45
stop
start
60
75
90
105
itop
itart
120
135
150
stop*
©
1342
1357
1412
1427
1427
1524
1539
1554
1609
1624
1624
1729
1744
1759
1814
1814
o
«Ai MM! H«4M«
(H*."1
598.0
650.7
702.2
750.1
ur.anged
Leak Ch>
753.0
C04.6
853.2
901.1
947.2
O.dnoert
Leak chi
949.4
1000.6
1053.2
1)00.6
Cfiariqcd
Le^V C!IL
G
MtMllt
^n»>j*
L60
1.55
1.60
1.45
1 Her/0
deed be
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
1.60
ilter/l)
eked be
1.50
1.40
1.40
1.45
filter/
cied-lit-
O
«li>
MlflCI rMtlaat
»|IU*llll*L
*Wl, |b •}•
«•»!•!•
-L65
1.65
1.65
1.65
•a me
•ore
1.65
L65
1,65
1.65
1.65
-aine
:«re
1.65
1.65
1.65
1.&5
train
tOl'-ti,
o
0>
uiwu
.U65
1.65
1.60
1.45
1 con
•esta
1.65
.L45
1^65
1.55
1.40
I con
•esta
1.65
1.60
1.60
J.45
cond
•t.'StJ
0
(•ul
tlrttut^t
ci.i.V
^6
?28
?25
221
lensate
•ti.ig -
235
227
224
228
226
lensate
•ting --
231
227
m
?30
.HSdte r
1:i-ig -•
©
••* tel *Mi
lt«rt»*HHi
1*11
"...^
__98
64
74
75
reser
O.oo:
54
66
74
80
77
resery
0.0(
58
68
75
77
t7Si?ryi
O.Of
O
•c»
.Ji_
52
61
64
oir
era
56
58
W
69
72
oir
4 cfi
61
61
65
68
ir
7 rf,
O
•si.
"••i
-16.!
-19.!
-22
-22
J? -iJ(
-164
-18
-20
-22
-22
$ -2
-16. t
-18. £
-21. r
-22. (
a .;
O
.^.
M>
«t«n««'-i
f
398
398
399
399
399
402
403
404
401
3"
402
403
404
403
Q
U> !
•MTUUff
HotulkM
•f
54
69
76
68
47
53
64
54
44
48
51
53
O
w
«•«!•!
!••*
UMIItllM
56
70
77
68
58
67
69
68
64
53
69
70
68
0
0
•MM
U**f**li#l
V
377
38S
385
391
391
39C
392
395
401
39:
38f
30£
39f
0
0)
i"i»i» *'j(.n!i al liiH -- AiMd! /'.o .j S.IIJL.I ijc
-------
TABLE 6-107. (Continued)
PtMt
Dm
Shawnee Steaa Plant
January 29 & 30. 1979
tion
Ssp
Venturi Scrubber Outlet
frrtt Lttitfc n4 TfH
MMtlt.LO.
Rao UcabCf
Op tut or _
VSS-1 (Continued)
LEAK CHECKS
Pretest: Aebient Tc*p. As»m«tfUAiiiaK.%
0-20
«OOF
Am!ii:m Ttmpcrjlure
Butmtiii: Pituuii _
XAD-2U«4i* Cuter
Ucttr Da I Uuniret
Mem /ML
C FKIM
Om Number
Ultt nunifaei(i)
8-20"
Post teat: 400F
Rttatmcc&f
0-20" CJfkiwBt tmt Rcp«n Checked By.
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
HEAD AND RECORD AtL DATA EVERY KINOTES
cr>
c»
WJII
1
IX*
i,l ' >' 1
x*^
;tart
165
180
190
; top
,tart
205
220
230
top
tart
245
260
top
tart
275
290
O
1915
1930*
1945
1955
1955
2046
2101
2116
2126
2126
2218
2233
2248
2248
2340
2355
0010
O
ty
Ml Will KUIM
1103.8
1158.0
1208.7
1240.3
Changed
leak the
1244.7
1296.2
1347.4
1380.0
Chanqed f
Leak chec
1381.7
1434.0
1485.5
Changed f
Leak chec
1487.6
1540.8
1592.0
O
MMCIIl
1.45
1.45
1.45
1.45
Filter/
:ked be
1.45
1.45
1.50
1.50
ilter/Di
;ed befc
1.50
1.50
1.40
Iter/Di
ed befc
1.50
1.45
1.45
O
0,!>
•Ml III fMIUM
•"•"•
1.65
|.65
1.65
1.65
rain
ore
1.65
1.65
1.65
1.65
ain (
re r<
1.65
1 6S
1.65
din c
re n
1.65
L.65_
1.65
O
«1>
MM.
.L65
1,60
1.50
1.40
condi
PStrt
1.65
1.65
1-.55
1.40
onder
start
It (ft
1 fil
1.40
ondei
start
JiH
^L
0
If rr| ••!**«
228
>2?
>26
230
nsate r
ring —
227
225
229
228
sate re
inn —
?30
227
..ate re
ng --
23ft
238
237
O
(•t 01 Milt
mil
__55_
67
73
76
iifiEVQ
n oo?
55
66
71
73
ervoi
.00?
52
66
orvrii
.003
51
65
66
O
•Mill
a<+Mfi
-5JL_
5.9
63
66
ir/Rp
cfm
58
58
62
64
.
cfm
.56_
61
cfm
53
•tf
60
O
.-,
•«t.
UA
•22.0
•22.0
3QV£_
>-20"
17
•20
-22
?2
'-20-
•17 •}
22
-20"
17
22.
O
(•>
- f
405
1Q1
402
402
,nln fr
406
401
401
402
401
401
401
405
3Qft
400
O
(.!>
f uUt
•I
54
«;?
60
61
im J < t i
45
50
53
54
43
46
51
44
53
O
(:!>
!»•*
Sfi
70
70
70
tminnpr
50
68
' 68
6ft
49
67
68
49
69
fifi
O
0
HJT.&M
•f
ion
186
ififl
390
382
382
374
381
1H7
380
389
3ft?
385
?fl1
O
-------
TABLE 6-107. (Continued)
PUnt Shavmee Steaa Plant
Out
January 29 & 30. 1979
LEAK CHECKS
Prate Infill int Typf
Scuict I.D. .
cition
SSP
Venturl Scrubber Outlet
Pretest: Ambient Temp. Anew** Uohiure, X.
Run Hunbtf
Optfilor _
VSS-1 (Co
6-20" XAD-2 MoJult Buwtrtf
Jeiu 9«s Uumbtr
Ovta Kuiutitf
AOOF
Amliicnl Tcmpcmur:
Bjfoinciiic Pitiwie .
Sink Pieiiuu. (Pj) .
Fillet (Junibei(i) __
C FlvIM
0-20" Ptofc. lUiltf Sciliaj
Post test: 400F
fi-20"
iioitt and fUpoil Chtcktd By .
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYCKJI
HEAD AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY MIWUTtS
I
CS
t**niM
r*iki
M^t*
End
t:x
f-.M*-'
\. *!«<• H-* ,
^s^ Q\ ft ci*r*l
^\CST
U»1I«4 ^X.
II-^.M« ^^^
Slop.
itart
305
315
315
11 ^
*',)
OQ1Q
0057
0112
0122
0122
o
i»*
«•• ft«H* M4«^
<
Ml**
^adei
star
1,65
1.60
1.45
0
1.56
,.«t
Kr«fu|^C
•••••V
4ata-«a
Inc --
_JJ2_
238
240
©
?29 . 7
t«« CAI Mlta
ll««li*l«M
itn
«'. ••»
*u
i€PV<^;
).002
49
58
62
o
Mb»
'^..n
cfm «
5?
52
54
O
62.4
»*•*
• *
-------
6-108- SKSS SKMPUflG DKTK SHEWS
Sluwnee Stean Plant
January 31. 1979
Dm
S.mpUnatoc.t»« Oxidation Tank Vent
S.a,«I.D._ SSP-OM
Una number
Operator
LEAK CHECKS
Pretest: Anbient Temp.
0.01 cfm fl_20«
Fr«6t lt*ftfc ia4 Typ«
36*- 316 stainless steel
"5755
Ai»ae4 Uoiunrt. X St
4100-018
OTV-2
Kohler/Howes
Ambient Terapciilurt
Buometric Piciuit .
filter Hymbfi(i)
30.21 in Hq
0.015
Meter B*« Number BCL33937
UUi.r £JI. 1.80 in H£Q
C FKIM —
n~. n.,.,h« 1070-022
Atmospheric
SSP-14 (1 filter!
I
C5S
cn
Post test: 400F
0.015
Pi»be I Idler Seilioj
QIC* Stttiiti
400
400 F
Cdi«l.rn*
M-.K.
l.l'-(
It/Wilt
X
"•*•-•
0
15
30
45
60
75
90
105
120
IVi
150
165
180
195
209
stop
;ui-r
210
O
X. CST
X
1030
1045
1100
1115
1130
1145
1200
1215
1230
1245
1300
1315
1330
1345
14GO
1400
1425
1426
£)
Ci)
Ul «... .(.**,
(..Ml
196.4
252.7
309.5
366.8
422.5
479.8
540.8
594.5
651.8
705.3
762.4
819.7
876.9
934.2
968.65
958.65
974.85
976.6
G
«ft*Cllt
*"«'"••'•
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.04
0.04
.04
.04
Stop
L*;.t
Stop
Leak
O
09
VI* Ml •
nun*
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1-8
1.8
1 R
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
>ed/l
rher
»ed/I
rher
a
0.)
r,tr
Ml—
.8
.8
,?
.8
.8
.8
.8
l.fi
V.8
1 8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.0
e pli
*-H h,
e pit
p(l hi
O
HUB
•n'.'f
99
100
100
99
99
99
101
103
102
Iftt
104
105
106
105
104
q in si
f.»r-o rf
g in si
fore re
O
M* "1
Mil
''•.. **
38
48
56
59
60
61
63
63
65
71
73
74
74
74
70
lica q
itarti
lica (
starti
O
Mill
Mill
""«,. 1
35
40
4ft
53
55
57
59
61
61
66
68
69
70
70
69
..
el
nn -•
O
.32,
"•i
-12. £
-n
-n
-12.5
-13
-13
-13
-n
-13
-n
-13
-13
-13
-13
0 n
0-fln
O
0
Nm«Hfff
f
394
392
394
397
397
396
399
395
396
397
391
397
395
396
405
'5 cfm
i cf«440
Q
&
IVIK4I
*»
41
W
5?
52
54
54
59
57
52
S3
53
53
53
53
51
i 20"
2ft"
O
(•)
Pai^ _
K»M«I
**
56
v\
Itf
52
50
53
53
53
52
5?
52
52
52
52
42
O
0
1 of
H^tttlWt
318
•nn
301
309
308
308
316
117
314
31fl
319
319
318
316
3R3
G
(0
2
-------
TABLE 6-108. (Continued)
flint Shawnee Steam Plant
Date January 31. 1979
Simplui] Location
Source I.D
Run riumbci
Opcoior
Oxidation Tank Vent
SSP-OTV
LEAK CHECKS
Pretest: Aubicnt Temp.
8-20"
Hwk.LO.
OTV-2 (Continued)
400F
Ambient Tcnipcraluic
Biioinelfic Pmuift _
Smic Prcuuie. (Pj| .
Fillet Numbcrd!
XAD 2 LUdola Number
U«Ur Swi Nrailitr
Ueta fill
C Factac
Ovtn Number
.8-20" ff«tt lluur feiiioj
Post test: 400P
8-20"
HcpMl Cbcclcd By .
SCHEMATIC OF TRAVERSE POINT LAYOUT
READ AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY UINUTES
I
CO
n..i.u
«"'•
i::.i
C-. -
\
"•«••"
star
220
235
250
265
?fln
295
305
10*
is..
A-aw-
\ CST
X
1440
1450
1505
1520
1535
1550
1605
1615
*.•*
W
W «« HW«
977.35
1016.8
1075.5
1133.6
1191.8
1251.5
1308.5
1347.4
i]J4 I&
/—
«..oit
v»tii«-«j»
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
!(WJaY
0 176
••I'KI r
Mllkll
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1,8
1.8
1.8
i a
v..?_
>IIH
«M
•"-
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1-8
1.8
1.8
0
,,«t
"«'.*f
106
106
105
106
106
105
105
105
© ^
I 103
V-t^, fc».n»^^.
••» iAI
Mil
"".. **
67
79
83
85
86
87
87
88
o
•J&
?-•
toUIt
l^.1f
66
70
75
78
79
81
81
82
Oj
,5 ^
,^
•••»
-13
-13
-12
-12
-12
-12
-12
-12
_Q_
^. .
uJH^M
•f
397
394
386
393
403
395
396
309
G
396
nSSSU,
^
57
48
49
51
52
53
53
51
O
52
K*lt«l
*f
38
50
51
53
54
55
55
55
O
51
•c
377
323
322
324
324
322
321
321
__Q_
322
-------
TRWI 6-109 . SfcSS SNKUHG Mil
Shawnee Steam Plant
n»t
D*t!
Suipfinf Lecitlo/i
Saatnl.0
RM Member
Opeiit*r
36* " 3*6 stainless steel,
February 2, 1979
TCA Outlet/after reheat
TCAS
TCAS- 3
D- KofiTer/J. Howes
Acilihot Tempt! atore
BarMKlikPitiiuct _
"
30.33 In Hg
H,0
5. 17. 19. 20.21.22.23.t 24
Total - 8 filters
LEAK CHECKS
Pretest: Anl-lent
0.015 cfa
400F
0.01 cfa
Post teat: AOOF
0.01. cfa
Temp.
e-20"
e-20"
8-20"
t>.»f. ID 0-50
a irt^.._- K 13
¥An.»^j.B«w, 4100-018
u«i» B.. n«k,r BCL 33937 ow. M*
llr'n All 1 " O 1 H H0Q
e F.-I./ ---
F.*k« tune. slc.L.li»f nU Rcp*
•U Mill MM»«
0352.2
0369.9
0406.1
0464.2
0478.2
Change
Leak c
0480.3
0517.0
0553.3
0589.8
Changed
Leak c
0596.2
0632.8
0669.6
070G.7
Changec
Leak <
O
•S&
3.2*
3.2*
2.6*
2.5*
2.4*
1 filter
tecked t
1.7
1.8
1.8
1.9
filter/
ecked b
1.8
1.9
1.9
1.9
filter/
hecked
O
10
M»I« miiMt
"""*
.8
.8
.8
.8
.8
/drai
efore
1.8
its'
1.8
)rain
sfore
1.8
1.8
_L8_
1.8
Drain
befor
O
0)
WIM4
.8
.8
.8
.65
.6
ted c
rest
1.8
l.fi
1.8
1.6
cond
rest
.8
.8
.8
.6
cond
_> res
O
..-•rrlL
218
218
210
241
234
mdensa
irting
229
233
223
?nsate
irtlng
229
237
234
234
:nsate
tarting
O
•M <*• alii*
•slk
39
46
59
65
66
e/rep
- 0.0
49
6J
69
71
- 0.(X
55
66
71
73
-- OJ
O
••fell
39
40
48
56
56
aced
5 cf
49
53
59
62
7 ct
56
58
63
66
35 C
O
•2^
-15
-16
-19
-22
-22
defe
i e-2i
-15
-20
-22
i & -t
-15
-17. '
-20. «
-22
M @
0
.^._
™*
390
396
398
396
399
tive •<
•
396
398
400
400
o-
399
400
400
401
24"
• o
o.
MTMUI
1
44
50
62
73
74
onehell
43
62
68
46
56
58
64
O
O
""If"""
37
53
59
63
61
-
46
62
65
65
44
59
62
64
O
0
• •Ml
"*V""
399
391
392
390
389
388
386
397
392
389
399
398
395
O
&•
(doll
it. tir tain
- Control room sliows ^30,000 cfm (n&nrjl)p<1!,c 1
-------
TABLE 6-109. (Continued)
f|Mt Shavnee Stea» Plant
Dtte
February 2. 1979
SimptinjLocition TCA Qiitler/afrpr
Source 1.0..
Ren Number TCAS-3 (Continued)
Operator
LEAK CHECKS
Pretest: Aa>ient Temp.
g-20"
400F
Ambient Tcmptulurt
Ehromtlnc Piet'.utc _
Frikt iMjth u4 Trpt
U«nJ*.I.O.
AnuouJ Uaitture, X
XAD-2 MsJaJt Kumbtr
Ikltr Dui Nuiohcr
Uf.er AJI
C Fictor
0*« Hvoiixr
Filter Nu
Oi
I
CO
Post test:
4 OOF
Frolic llcjtsr Sellioj
Otto Setlin]
fUlcicuce AP
§-20"
uj md Rcpail ClrtckeJ By .
SCHEMATIC OF TRAtTf RSE TOINT LAYOUT
HEAD AND RECORD ALL DATA EVERY MINUTES
Hi"
i;x
i^
star
105
lib
125
stop
star
135
145
155
165
stop
star
175
185
195
205
StCj
1340
1350
1400
1410
1410
1500
1510
1520
1530
1540
1540
1630
1640
1650
1700
1710
1710
i
O
(>,>.tii
711.3
748.3
785.3
822.3
Changed F
Leak che
826.3
863.9
901.2
938.6
976.2
Changed
Leak Che
978.6
1015.3
1052.5
1089.8
1126.3
Changed
L'-Mk LtlL-
.V^lLQj-J*' _-(r'_
•VtMllf
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
Hter/Dr
hk befoi
2.0
2.0
1.9
1.9
1.9
:ilter/L
:k befoi
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
1.9
rilter/l
.If. befoi
O
Ci|_
"lirT'if
Mllhtt
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
ain c
e re:
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
raine
e reS
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
rairu
e re:
O
Js> -
"'~
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.65
onder
tarti
1.8
1.8
1,8
1.8
d coi
tarti
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.6
d coi
tort i
O
KM*
1-32
236
.''32
233
sate
ng -- .
195
;'3l
235
235
233
denser
n -- 0.
234
234
m
?37
234
denser
59
71
76
77
109 cf
63
75
81
03
84
)3 cfni,
65
68
76
79
80
00 8
O
MHI 1
59
62
67
70
11 (3 -
63
66
71
74
77
9 -2
67
67
69
72
74
0 i
1
.t?I.
-15
-17
-20
-22
Ti"
-15
-16.
-18
-20
-22
J"
-15
-16.
-18
-21
-22
'K
_:lL
•*•
f
399
400
401
401
304
. 401
400
399
400
396
. 397
399
399
399
;
!•*!•((•
I
57
56
58
65
56
58
56
58
62
51
54
53
57
62
0 i 0
"•"If*
4?
60
64
66
51
59
62
64
66
51
61
65
66
69
O i
_^_J._j2 jy_J
M~O.I-«
402
390
404
395
404
392
397
401
399
379
387
390
390
386
~§~
-------
TABLE 6-109-. (Continued)
ftwt Shatfne* Steaa Plant
Dttt February 2. 1979
0"tlet/after reheat
Scarce 1.0.
AM Number
Operator
TCAS
TCAS 3(Continued)
LEAK CHECKS
Pretesc: Aublcnt Temp.
f-20"
400F
AciliieBl Temperature
tuwntltk Pituuti _
Flier Uinubei(t)
8-20"
Uwitt.lJ).
Astocol LUtawt. X
XA07UWal«l
U
VO
nntm
tw.l
mfttt
iru
r.i'ft
^x. Jl«" •"* .
\*-Kf
•M«il«C ^^^
IM.«M ^v.^
star
215
225
235
245
stop
star
*!)!>
265
275
285
stop
285
O
1755
1805
1815
1825
1835
1925
1935
1945
1965
2005
— End
©
CS>
4*4 •« *• «(J«M«
N»).M>
1128.2
1165.4
1202.5
1239.8
1276.1
Changed f
Leak cht
1279.6
1316.4
1353.6
1390.8
1428. 9
)f Run 200
Leak Che
1050. b
G
mvit?
*»0"tjfl
1.9
1.9
2.0
2.0
2.0
ilter/D
:ked be
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
> Mrs
:ked at
^VjPWlw
1.3(1
••irKI fM«t«H
Mllliillltt.
C-». H 1^1
•IMMt
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
ain
ore
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
end (
<|0
0)
num.
1.8
l.d
1.8
1.75
1.6
onderj
esta
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
f te;
0
1.76
l**41
tfr«| •»!«•!
«•••/»
237
215
228
219
217
sate
ting —
233
229
224
226
222
t -- 0.
©
229
M* Ul Mil*
IIMIMIvM
Mil
"<>,.Hf
63
66
72
77
79
0.018
61
66
71
74
77
2 cfir
"0"
Miff
"•w.'V
66
65
67
69
72
cfn
64
64
65
68
70
0 -2
O
65.8
»•«
-16
-17
-20
-22
-22
i -20
-15
-17
-18
-20
-21
It
O
0
•M*
k^t»i«M
T
400
398
399
399
399
408
400
400
401
401
G
399
p»*Ul
H>rtt»hM
«»
52
54
54
58
63
49
52
53
58
61
O
57
Mm*
m»
— w—
52
62
65
66
73
50
63
66
68
67
0
60
»M*I
n *•<»!>»<
•f
399
391
394
392
386
395
391
392
391
394
O
393
of
-------
. PUneSh«vn««
A-9
TABLE 6-110. SASS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA SHEETS
SASS ANALYTICAL DAIA
_________ Sanple Ho.
Sampling Location V«nturi Scmbb«r Ouelac
Recovered By Hov«t & Kohler Recovery Oitel/30/79
Coonenti
Run tio. VSS-1
Run Dace 1/29/79
Autlyit J. Hove,"
UiEb
FILTER HOLDCH
CYCLOMCS
No. SSP-1 («)
3SP-7 (b)
No. 1
(No.)
SSP-8 (c)
SSP-9 (d)
SSf-10 (•)
'J
-------
A-10
TABLE 6-111. SASS SAMPLE RECOVERY DATA SHEETS
SASS ANALYTICAL DATA
Mane
Flint
SampIt Mo.
Oxidation Tank 7«nc/Vint'ir<
Run tlo. OTV-2
fc.cov.rod gy Ho««« i Kohl«r
Raeov.ry Data 2/1/79 Run Datojj
! /79
Cocaant*
J. HOWM
PlLim UiEo
No. 3SP-14 («) No.
FILTER HOUJCK
_Wu
_3f
CYCtCNES
Ut.4
Prictr.d ContaLa.c
(Ko.)
- inc
IXPIXCCX VCLt>CS
Initltl
Rin««
Totals
Flrae (HZ02)
7SQ-
_ol
ni
UOQ «u
o/
91
_a*
"ml
625
_ci
~ci
Saeond (APS * ApOj; ,
Third (APS + A£'0})
. rOTALS
500 • ol
•'1750 eU
-------
TABLE 6-112. SASS sd&lk RECOVERY DATA SHEETS
SASS AN/J.YT1CAL OA1A
Plant Shavnee Steam Plane
Sample Ho._
Sampling Location TCA Scrubber Onrlur
Recovered By Howe* 4 Kohler Recovery Date 2/3/79
COKittenti
Run llo. TCAS-3
Run Date 2/2/79
A..,y.,
HOW.8
FILTE 1)
FILTER HOLDER
CYCLONES
No.
SSP-15
SSP-17
SSP-19
SSP-20
SSP-21
(a)
(b)
fc)
(d)
(«)
No. 2
1
2
1
2
_ Used
(yea/no)
«V y««
3U Yts
lu vaa
Precarod Container
(No.)
TCAS-IOC
TCAS-3C
IC4S»I£
IMPISCZR VOLUMES
Initial
Rinse
Totals
rirat (H20j)
Second (APS
Third (APS +
+ At'O,)
TCTALS
750 nl
500 mi
500 • oj
"1750 oi
1060
560
448
2068
"U 212
»« 150
n/ 113
nl
at.
mi
mi
Gain
1272
918
333
318
ni
ml
=il
nl
GEL
Initial
1230 ,
- f
Final
1497.5
t
K
t «
TOTALS
1250 s
1497.3
S
C«ln
247.5
TOTAL VOLU«S COLLECTED
Voluae tlea:
Volume E.t:ca::e-J
Volume CHjCij I.-.trae: (3 x 45
2135
2135
2161
460
jut
at
HC1 usad to actdifv co
Cxcraccod Ccndensate: pH Xeec
Aoouac 76" ffi.'Oj added
pH Final
2 & 12
Calculationi and Rtport Chtcked 8y
FILTER DATA (Coneinued)
S3P-22 (f) J
3SP-23 (») 2
TCTM. CAC;
2700.5
Condensor Rlnsa Volume
(Methylana Chloride)
300
mi
I Reproduced from
boU nvailflblc copy.
6-92
-------
TABLE 6-113 . SASS SAMPLE WEIGHT BATA
Outn.HkUT Jaouary 27.
1979
vC
CO
^bruary 6. 1979
• Mettler HCT f 184191
f AKTICUUTE LOAD PIC PATA
FIELD .-»-.-» l/j •»-»-» FIELD Cttabtttn Prttrl If
Give Cross (C). Tare (T), and Net (H) Heights and Units for All Applicable Samples
Sample Ho.
and Sice Naae
and Loco C loo
tun VSS-1
Veaturl Scrubbe
Shawnee Sceaa
Plant. Paducah
Ky
fartlculnte Filter
•SP-BCl.-PFa-VSSfl
C 1.1855 g
T 1.0251 K
H 0.1602 g
SSP-BCL-PFb-VSS-1
C 1.2S94 g
"T 1.1266 u
•H 0.1328 e
SSf-BCL-PFc-VSS-1
C 1.2A94 g
T 1.1267 g •
1 H 0.1227 K
SSP-BCL-PFd- VSS-1
C 1.2645 B
T 1.1145 g
II 0.1300 g
SSP-BCL-1'Fe-VSS-l
C 1.2869 g
T 1.1524 g
>t fl 1 t/. S |.
l)i Cyclone
SSP-BCL-1C-VSS-1
081.9406 g
Wl.8929 g
M 0.0477 g
G
T
M
G
r
N
G
T
H
C
T
tl
\ Cyclone
.SP-BCL-3C- VSS-1
' C 80.9330 g
T 80.9004 g
N 0.0326 g
C
T
M
G
T
N
G
T
H
C
T
N
l(\i Cycloee
SSP-BCI.-10C-KS-1
C 81.7717 g "
T 81.3131 g
N 0.4586 g
G
T
H
G
T
II
G
T
H
G
T
M,
?robo Rinse Solids
Vnln_-ASf) .1
SSP-BCL-PR-VSS-l
G 1*7.6368 g
T 147.2787 g
M 0.3581 g
C *
1—
T
H
C
T
N
C
T •
H
G
T
K
-------
TABLE 6-113. (Continued)
• January 27. 1979
cr>
i
vo
a... w«i
t979
Mettier HOT
PARTICUUTE LOADING DATA
FIELD >-*-*-* LAB -*-*•» FIZIO
J. Bowes
Give Gross (G), Tare (T), and Net (N) HclphtB and Units for All Applicable Samples
Saaplc Ho.
and Sice Haae
and LocaCloo
Run VSS-1
(Continued)
Total Catch
Paniculate Filter
SSP-BCL-PFF-VSS-1
G 1.2579 g
T 1.1378 g
H 0.1201 g
SSP-BCL-PPg- VSS-1
C 1.2616 g
" T 1.1304 g
: H 0.1312 g
C
T
1 It
G
T
N 1.0463 g
G
T
11
l|i Cyclone
G
T
H
G
T
H
C
T
N
G
T
H 0.0477 g
G
T
11
i
3)1 Cyclone
i
• c
T
H
G
T
H
G
T '
N
C
T
H 0.0326 g
C
T
N
Ity Cyclone
G
T
H
G
T
H
G
T
H
G
T
0.4586 g
G
T
N
i
Frobe Rinse Sollda
C
T
M
G f
T
H
G
T
H
G
T •
H
0.3581 g
G
T
H
-------
TABLE 6-114. SASS SANI-LE WEIGHT DATA
• January 27. 1979
February 6. 1979
LOADINC DATA
Hettler H£I 1184191
_
FIELD -•»-*-» (LAB) -»-»-» FIELD
J. Howes
Give Cross (C), Tare (T), «nd Met (N) Weigliti and Units for All Applicable
Saaplc No.
and Site Home.
and Location
fc* OTV-2
Gndation tank
»ent pipe/
Venturi Scrubb
Sr.*wnee Steaa
?)tni
Total catch •
Fartlculate Filter
'.
SSP-BCL-PFa-OTV-2
1-12289
rT 1.1217g
N O.OOHg
C
"T
U
C
T
IH
G
T
11 O.OOHg
C
T
M
I)i Cyclone
C No participates
j collected In
lu rvrlonp
M
C
T
M
C
T
H
.G
T
N
C
T
M
3(i Cyclone
' G No participates
collected In
* 3u cyclone
N
G
T
H
G
T
N
G
T
N
G
T
N
Ity Cyclooe
C No pmlcMlites
collected in
T 10 p cyclone
U
C
T
N
G
T
N
G
T
H
G
T
M
Probe Ulnae Solid*
Voliwe - 250 •!
G 141.0803g
T 141. 061 89
U O.OlBSg
c f
T *-
N
G
T
H
G
T
H O.OISSg
G
T
H
-------
TABLE 6-115 . SASS SAMPLE WEIGHT DATA
January 27. 1979.
February 6. 1979
Hettler H6T. HB4191
PARTICUMTE LOADTXC DATA
,
FIELD >-*•»-» (LAD) •»-»-* FIELD
J. Howes
Give Gross (G), Tore (T), and Hec (H) Weights and Unit] for All Applicable Sanplca
Sa»plc Ho.
and Site Haae
«od Location
RUN TCAS-3
TCA scrubber
lhd*nee Stea*)
Plant
Pdducah, Ky.
Partlculoce Filter
SSP-BCL-PFa_TCAS-3
G 1.25259
T 1.132Sg
II 0.12009
SSP-BCL-PFb-TCAS-3
1.25129 .
''T 1.14529
•11 0.10609
SSP-BCL-PFc-TCAS-3
G 1.24819
T 1.13159
IH 0.1066g
SSP-8Cl-pfd-TCAS-3
1.2401g
T ) . 1 300y
11 0.1101.J
SSP-BCL-PFe-TCAS-3
c 1.22090
T l.lltilg
u 0.102«ij
Ifi Cyclone
SSP-BCL-IC-TCAS-3
G 82.37949
T 81.65899
N 0.72059
C
T
«
C
T
H
.C
T
11
G
T
I!
3^1 Cyclone
, SSP-BCL-3C -TCAS-3
C 82.04209
t 81.80769
N 0.2344g
C
r
H
G
T
H
G
T
N
G
T
N
Ity Cyclone
SSP-BCL-10C-TCAS-3
C 82.3087g
T 82.1275g
N 0.1812g
G
T
H
C
T
N
G
T
11
G
T
If
i
Probe Rinse Solid*
Voluae - 425 nl
C 149.1372g
T 148.7772g
H 0.3600g
c r
h-
T
1)
G
T
H
G
T
H
G
T
H
-------
TABLE 6-115. (Continued)
January 27. 1979
I
IO
February 6, 1979
UanftcJ
Jtettler H6T. 1184191
rARTlCUUTg LOAniNC DATA
" " '
FBLD •-»•••» (LAB) •».»•» FIELD Ucrijtbit Ctockri If
Give Gross (G), Tare (T), and Met (H) Ucl(jlit« and Holts for All Applicable Staples
S— pic No.
•nd Sice HUM
«od Locacloa
iUI TCAS-3
(Continued)
Tut.il i.atch '
fMJ-MfcthanoJ/
»*tnylene chlor
blank for RUNS,
VSS-1. OIV-2 i
ICAS-3
Pnrtlculate Filter
SSP-BCL-PFf-TCAS-3
° 1.24519
T I.1261g
H 0.11909
SSP-BCL-PF9-TCAS-3
C 1.25689
"T 1.13689
•H 0.12009
SSP-BCL-PFh -TCAS-3
c 1.22009
T 1.13849
IN 0.08169
G
T
U 0.8661g
d(C
T
>J
l)t Cyclone
C
T ;
H
C
T
H
G
T
N
C
T
H 0.720&9
G
T
11
3^ Cyclone
i
' G
t
N
C
T
N
G
T
N
G
T
N 0.2344g
G
T
N
10,1 Cyclooa
C
T
N
C
T
N
G
T
H
G
T
11 O.I812g
G
T
N
Probe Rime SolUt
G
T
H
c T
I-*
T
N
G
T •
N
C
T -
H 0.3600g
C 146.54139
T 146.5423g
„ O.OOlOg
-------
A-17
TABLE 6-116. PROCESS SAMPLING DATA SHEETS
SOLIDS FIELD DATA
GENERAL
, „. Shawnee Steam Plant/Scrubber Facility
SampU S«t» —___
TypiofSoum Venturi scrubber system
Sampling Location Sampling point 1821
Simplt Typi: Inorganic x Organic
M..mh.,SSP-BCL-FC-l/29/79-VS1821 _ Dati Takin 1/?
-------
A-18
FAULE 6-117. PROCESS SAMPLING DATA SHEETS
LIQUIDS FIELD DATA
Reproduced Irom e-raa
best available copy. ISi GENERAL
_Uti Shawnee Steam Plant/Sernhhor Vaf^^^^•••^
FypeofSourci Venturl acruhhoi-
limp ling Location Sampling point VS1816
w
limp It Typ«: Aqutous ___________ Surry x Organic
timrt. fitt-h- SSP-BCL-VSTS-I/29/79-VS18I6 n...Tjy» 1/29/79 1649 hrs CST
sr9Mtu« Jamea E. Howes Jr./Jerry Clapp (TVA)
Ofvia _ " Sampli Mats or Volum* 17 1 <
Simplt: Yts - or No - £ - .
-'ipr and/or Valumi of Portion! ct Comoou'ti:
Dnoiptioo: ' Fluid x Viscous . Hat * Cold _____ Flowing — £ - Still
* ' Hornsgenious _____ Htttroginious - Color
__,. "* None
Preblerm •
TVA Lab analysis obtained
6-99
-------
A-19
TABLE 6-118. PROCESS SAMPLING DATA SHEETS
SOLIDS FIELD DATA
GENERAL
Simpli Si:e Shavmee Steam Plant/Scrubber Facility
TyptofSoun:. TCA acrubber ayatem
Sinipfing Location Centrifuge cake discharge
Samplt Typt: Inoqjnic ^ Organic
Samplt Number SSP-BCL-CC-2/2/79-TCA Oiti Tiktn 2/7/79 0845 CST
Stiff Signituri James E. Howea, Jr./Jerry Clapp (TVA)
Simpling OPTICS Scoopula Samp!« Mass or Volum* ~2 kg
*»
Compovhi Sd.-npli: YK or No .
If Compojfte. Numbtr ind/or Volum« of Portiorn of Compoiiti: /
Samplt Dsic-nprtion: Homogtntout _____ Hnerogtntoui x Pawdtr Small Pieces
Urga Rew JS Color gray Wet x Dry
nt
Sampfing ProbUmi
Solids - 632
Water - 37%
6-100
-------
ADDITIONAL DATA
6-101
-------
TAHI-t 1. iXai MASS LOADING AMU PAKT1CU1.E SIZE DISTglBl.TJlW UAtA
o
i
t—t
c
I0v
Veutuil
Flue Gas
UxlJatlau
»a»t fugitive
TCA SccuktMtr flue Can
SASS Sw»pK Collected, g
.yilo«« cacti* 0.4586
itiMc taiili 0.0126
cl^n. ctta. 0.047?
:l l«ICll 1.O461
: fc cycinuc tlB»« O.15SI
Z DU(ctt>«tlua
br Uciekt
2J.t
1.7
•'.5
51. •
18.4
Mass(«) ,
I^adluR. mt/m1
14.0
1.1
15
)!.»
11.6
ttiss
Collected, g
O.OQOO
O.OOOO
O.OOOO
O.UOI1
0.0185
Z Dlbtrlbullo*.
ly Weight
0.0
U.O
0.0
5.6
*<..*
Miss'tl
lading. «g/»]
O.OO
O.UO
o.oo
a. 01
0.56
Mass
Collected, g
0.1812
0.2M4
0.7105
0.8661
O.36OO
X Distribution Has«(c> ,
by UeiKkt Ixiadimj. •&/•'
7.7 *• «>
9.9 7 7
30.5 «.?
16.7 2t.5
15.2 11. S
Tutali
1.94)]
le vul
- lO.yiki • (sctl-Jry)
- 12.674 «J ( " • )
- y».4io i-1 ( " " )
100
62.9
0.0196
100
0.60
2.3622
100
77.7
-------
TABLE 5. LEVEL 1 CHEMICAL ANALYSES PERFORMED
ON SHAWNEE SCRUBBER SAMPLES
Organic Analysis
Inorganic
Sample SSMS
Analysis
Neat Extracts
TCO GRAY
I p - --
IR ^ TCO
LC Fractions
GRAV IR LRMSW
SASS Samples - Venturi Scrubber Stack Gas
Probe & cyclone rinse X
10 + 3)iia particulates X
lum + filter particulates X
XAD-2 + Module rinse X
Extract of condensate
Aq. condensate + 1st
impinger X
2nd + 3rd impinger
SASS Samples - Oxidation Tank Vent
Probe & cyclone rinse X
Filter X
XAI>-2 + Module rinse X
Extract of condensate
Aq. condensate + 1st
impinger X
2nd + 3rd impinger
SASS Samples - TCA Stack Gas
Probe & cyclone rinse X
10 + 3 pm particulates X
lum + filter particulates X
XAD-2 + module rinse X
Extract of condensate
Aq. condensate + 1st
impinger X
2nd + 3rd impinger
Hg
Hg
Hg
Hg
Hg
Hg, As, Sb
Emissions
Hg
Hg
Hg, As, Sb
Hg
Hg
Hg
Jig
Hg
Hg, As, Sb
X
X
X
X X
X X
h
X
X X
X X
X
X
X
X X
X X
X
x G
XXX
XXX
X ^
&
X ^
XXX
x
X X 6/7
X X 6/7
X X 6/7
X X 6/7
X X
-------
TABLE 5. (Continued)
en
i
o
-t.
Inorgani
Sample SSMS
Scrubber Samples
Venturi spray tower
slurry X
Venturi filter cake X
TCA centrifuge cake X
Organic Analysis
c Analysis Neat Extracts „ LC Fractions
AAS(a>> TCO GRAV IR TCO GRAY IR LRMS ^
Hg X XXXX XX
Hg X XXXX XX
Hg XXX
(a) Element(s) analyzed by AAS are indicated.
(b) Indicates LC fraction analyzed by LRMS.
-------
TABLE 6. SUMMARY OF ORGANIC MASS CONCENTRACTTON IN SASS
AND SCRUBBER PROCESS SAMPLES
01
i
Sample
SASS probe & cyclone rinse
SASS 10 + 3pm particulates
SASS lym -1- filter particulates
SASS XAD-2 + module rinse
SASS condensate extract
Totals
Venturl spray tower slurry,
TCO -f GRAV
Venturl filter cake, TCO + GRAV
TCA centrifuge cake, TCO + GRAV
Venturi Scrubber Oxidation Tank Vent TCA Scrubber
TCO + GRAV, rag/m3 TCO + GRAV, mg/m3 TCO + GRAV, mg/m3
0.10 NS(a) 0.13
2.13 NS 1.01
3.00 0.49 1.28
1.37 1.49 1.15
0.09 0.03 0.10
6.69 2.01 3.67
3.97 rag/liter
15.82 mg Kg
9.67 ag/Kg
(a) NS - No sample
-------
STUDY NUMBER 7
-------
STUDY NUMBER 7
DATA
SOURCE:
ANALYSES OF GRAB SAMPLES
FROM FIXED-BED COAL
GASIFICATION PROCESSES
DATA
STATUS:
EPA-600/7-77 141, December 1977
AUTHOR:
CONTRACTOR:
Karl J. Bombaugh
Radian Corporation
P.O. Box 9948
Austin, Texas 78766
Contract No. 68-02-2147
PROJECT
OFFICER:
William J. Rhodes
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
7-1
-------
Coal gasification is the process of using heating operations to convert
coal to a combustible gas. The stated purpose of this study was "to aid in
planning for future more comprehensive environmental test programs which will
be conducted at (other) gasification facilities." Level 1 samples were taken
at five commercial-seaU> fixed-bed gasifiers and at one pilot-scale operation,
identified herein as sites A, Bl, B2, B3, Cl, and C2. lablo /-I (from Uu>
report) identifies the coal type and samples collected at each site. Emphasis
was placed on characterizing site A, which had already been selected for
detailed testing at a later date. Some site A preliminary results were reported
in an earlier data compilation (ref. 4).
figure 7-1 (from the document) is a schematic of Sito A, which is described
as an atmospheric, single-stage, fixed-bed, air-blown gasifier. At site A
coal enters the top of the gasification chamber through a barrel valve and is
spread across a fixed grating. Steam and air enter through the bottom of the
gasification chamber and pass through the grating and the gasification zone.
Ash is pushed with a plow from a water-sealed pan at the bottom of the gasifier
The hot product gas goes through a cyclone then through a series of spray-
scrubbers into a gas main where product gases from several gasifiers are
combined and fed to a combustion chamber. The quench liquor flows to a separ-
ator tank where tars and oils are removed to a combustion chamber. Excess
(aqueous) separator liquor is pumped to an evaporator, and the remainder is
recirculated to the scrubbers.
Sites B-1, B-2, and B-3 are similar- to s i t.e A except that, they burn
anthracite coal, which has essentially no tars. These sites also differ in
that they burn the product gas directly after removal of large particulates by
a hot cyclone. Site C-l, burning bituminous coal, is a commercial-scale unit
and cyclone coupled to a flare by a long run of insulated duct.
Site C-2 is a pilot-scale operation burning bituminous coal and consisting
of a small gasifier chamber, cyclone, single-stage scrubber, and electrostatic;
precipitator. The product gas from site C-2 is fed to a test burner.
1-2
-------
TABLE 7-1. SAMPLES COLLECTED FOR PRELIMINARY SCREENING
Site
A
Bl
B2
B3
Cl
C2
Feed
coal
type
Bituminous
Anthracite
Anthracite
Anthracite
Bituminous
Bituminour.
Cyclone
bottom
dust
X
X
-
X
X
-
Gas i fier
bottom
Tar ash
X X
-
'' -
-
-
X
Process
condensate
X
-
-
-
-
X
Gas
duct
dust
-
-
X
-
X
-
*A11 sites utilize single-stage, fixed-bed, air-blown, atmospheric pressure
gasifiers.
7-3
-------
COAL OU3T
COAL FEEDER
VENT OASES
LIQUOR TRAP
VAPORS
FEED.
COAL
LIQUOR SEPARATOR
FUGITIVE VAPORS
LIQUOR
SEPARATOR
VAPORS AND STEAM
EVAPORATOR
GASES
STEAM
AIR
GASIFIER
ASH
(WET)
STEAM TO
EDUCTOR
COLLECTED
PARTICULATE3
-------
A modified Level 1 protocol was followed for sampling and analysis. Some
deviations from the specified Level 1 protocol follow:
1. Organic samples were evaporated directly onto the LC column material.
2. In the determination of C7-C12 hydrocarbons, a 3% OV-101 column was
used. The column was programmed at 50° C for 4 minutes then heated
at 8° C/minute to 150° C.
3. All elements except Hg were analyzed by SSMS.
4. The Level 1 protocol specifies three 500-mL extractions of 10-L
samples. In this study, four 100-mL volumes of CH2C12 were used to
extract a 100-mL sample of separator liquor. One milliliter of the
combined extracts was used for GC analysis and the remainder was
concentrated by evaporation and weighed.
5. In addition to the modified Level 1 CH2C12 extraction, subsequent
extractions were performed using diethyl ether at pH 1 and pH 7.
6. The tar sample was extracted 24 hours with CH2C12 in a Soxhlet
apparatus. The residue in the Soxhlet thimble was then extracted
with tetrahydrofuran (THF) to check for the presence of materials
soluble in THF but not soluble in CH2C12-
7. A tar sample, mixed with a larger volume of CH2C12, was filtered
through a medium-frit filter, then through Whatman No. 42 paper. The
filter catches were examined microscopically and weighed.
8. A lower limit of 8 mg of organics (per 50.3 g ash sample) for LC
fractionation was used.
Some major results of the study were:
1. The quench liquor contains elemental concentrations that equal or
exceed the standards for surface, irrigation, and drinking water in
nearly all cases. Selenium levels were outstandingly higher than
standards.
2. Site A separator liquor had 3.8 times the level of organics that
site C quench liquor contained, and the compositions of these extracts
were unexpectedly different.
Some additional procedures were recommended as candidates for inclusion
in the Level 1 protocol. A 1:1 ratio of solvent to extracted liquid, with
7-5
-------
four sequential extractions using CH2C12 was suggested. Additional extractions
at pH 1 and pH 7 using diethyl ether were recommended. UV spectrometry was
proposed as a supplement to IR in screening for polycyclic aromatic organics,
and HPLC or TLC was suggested to "discriminate between the nonvolatile component
classes" in the major (heavier) LC fractions. Elemental analysis of LC fractions
for S and N to screen for organosulfur and/or organic nitrogen compounds was
recommended. In addition to these recommendations on methodology, further
studies on particle removal over a wide range of conditions were recommended.
7-6
-------
LEVEL 1
7-7
-------
TABLE 7-2. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SITE A QUENCH LIQUOR
(ug/L)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg*
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
0.04 Eu
Sm
0.007 Nd
Pr
Ce
la
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
<0.01
0.005
0.0]
- 1) . 0 1
0. J
1
0.5
0.1
0.02
Std
<0.02
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
SH
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
0.06
.
0.01
<0.004
0.2
0.03
().?
4
0.2
<0.02
0.006
0.07
0.1
0.1
< 0.008
3
0.03
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
l>
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
0.03
0.004
0.05
<0.006
MC
MC
0.3
MC
MC
/
1
2
MC
>^j f\
•-•£.
2
0.2
MC - Major component.
*F lame'I ess atomic absorption.
NOTE: Any element not listed = concentr-ation <^ 0.004. Carbon, hydroyen,
nitrogen, and oxygen are excluded from these analyses.
7-8
-------
TABLE 7-3. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPFCTROSCOPY
SITE A TAR
(ppm wt.)
u
Th
Bi
Pb 10
Tl
Hg* 0.12
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.6
0.3
0.5
0.6
27.0
0. 1
1
0.8
0.9
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
So
Ab
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Cot
Fe
Mn
1
0.7
<0.2
10
0.2
2
3
4
1
8
7
3
5
5
120
0.9
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
C1
s
p
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
3
0.8
29
0.7
630
100
6
520
17
170
2b
23
71
~22
19
0.1
4
*Flameless atomic absorption.
IHeterogeneous.
NOTE: Any element not listed in the table, if present, was at a concentration
less than 0.2 ppm by weight.
7-9
-------
TABLE 7-4. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SITE A CYCLONE DUST
(ppm wt.)
u
Th
Bi 2
Pb 60
Tl
Hg* 0.01
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
9
2
1
9
21
5
45
45
460
1
4
8
2
Std
<2
3
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
••.-.•,:•- • -"^s.~i r:r,=:
14
12
80
70
340
33
20
24
27
5
130
85
130
30
16
MC
120
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
90
100
MC
12
MC
MC
/?()
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
2^720
70
6
27
MC = major component.
*Flameless atomic absorption.
NOTE: Any element not listed = concentration <0.2 ppm by weight.
7-10
-------
TABLE 7-5. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
GASIFIER ASH
(ppm wt.)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
An
Pt.
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
56
86
0.4
7
0.5
0.3
10
2
10
2
12
1
8
11
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
17
4
10
5
28
56
42
260
280
MC
10
0.3
1
4
Std
3
<0.3
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Kb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
22
82
430
260
MC
120
12
20
4
4
66
26
540
120
61
MC
680
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
h
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
510
MC
MC
29
MC
MC
?:w
?!)0
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
^56
130
22
190
MC = major component.
NOTE: Any element not listed = concentration £0.2 ppm by weight.
7-11
-------
TABLE 7-6. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
SITE A QUENCH LIQUOR EXTRACT
Gas
GC7
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC1&
GC16
GC17
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
>220
^220
>220
>220
>220
Volatile
weight, ppm
260*
0
0
2,544
2,766
917
800
800
800
800
800
kGC7 is not usually included in TCO range, i.e., C8-Ci(
7-12
-------
TABLE 7-7. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
SITE A TAR
Gas
GC7*
GC8
GC9
GC10
GC11
GC12
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
Range
90-110
110-140
140-160
160-180
180-200
200-220
>220
Volatile
weight, ppm
3,
18,
56,
72,
307,
000
0
0
200
700
500
500
No. of
peaks
*Not usually included in TCO range, i.e., Ca-C16.
Note: Analyses were performed on a 1-mL aliquot of a sample contain-
ing about 2.41 mg of tar extract/mL of methylene chloride.
TABLE 7-8. GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY ANALYSIS
SITE A QUENCH LIQUOR EXTRACT
Volatile No. of
Gas Range weight, ppm peaks
GC7* 90-110 260
GC8 110-140 0
GC9 140-160 0
GC10 160-180 2,544
GC11 180-200 2,766
GC12 200-220 917
GC13
GC14
GC15
GC16
GC17
>220 800
*Not usually included in TCO range, i.e., C8-C16.
Note: The authors note that "The material in the C7 range is
believed to originate with the extracting solvent since
it is inconceivable that significant levels of C7's could
be present with no detectable quantities of either C8's or
P i, ii
L<| S.
7-13
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 7-9
LC ANALYSIS RESULTS
Total Sample1*
Taken (or LCC
Recovered
TCO
mg
GRAV
mg
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration8
mg/ (m-*, L, or kg)
2231
Fraction
TCO1
mg
GRAV'
mg
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration3
mg/ (m^, L, or kg)
0.3
1.8
5.0
17.0
Sum
163.0
1655.0
69.0
2097.1*
*Includes LC fraction 8, at a concentration of 186.0 mg/L.
procedure (October 1978) utilizes 7 LC fractions.
Revised Level 1
* Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC.
** Portion of whole simple usad for LC, actual mg.
0 Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg.
Total mg computed back to total sample.
8 Values supplied for both temple size and concentration.
' Not detectable.
-------
SAMPLE:
IAULL /-in
LC ANALYSIS RESULTS
Total Sample1*
Taken for LCe
Recovered
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
a
7
TCO
mg
TCO1
mg
GRAV
mg
ORAV*
mg
TCO + GRAV
total mg
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration3
mg/ (m^, L, or kg)
668,864
560,159
(83.7%)*
Concentration*
mg/ (m^, L, or kg)
1494
10,954
96,795
47 ,004
41,029
293,374
27,883
Sum
560,159
Mncludos LC fraction 8, at a concentration of 41,626 mg/kl
procedure (October 1978) utilizes 7 LC fractions.
* Quantity in entire umpla, dtttrmintd before LC.
b Portion of whoU lampU used for LC, actual mg.
c Quantity racovtrtd from LC column, actual mg.
d Total mg computed back to tool tampli.
' ValuM tuppliad for both umpla liza and eoneantratlon.
f Not datactabla.
7-15
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLfc 7-11
LC ANALYSIS RESULTS
Total Simple13
Tikin for LCC
Recovered
Friction
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
TOO
mg
TCO*
mg
GRAV
mg
GRAV1
mg
TCO + GRAV
total mg
TCO * GRAV
total mg
Concentration3
mg/ (m3, L, or kg)
381
, 31U»
(81.4/;;)
Concentration8
mg/ (m3, L, or kg)
109
IB
1
3
3
113
19
Sum
310*
*Includes LC fraction 8, 44 mg/kg. The Level 1 procedure now has 7 LC fractions.
a Quantity in antirt sampla, datarminad bafora LC.
b Portion of whole sampla mad for LC, actual mg.
c Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg.
d Total mg computad back to total tampla.
' Values supplied for both sampla size and concantration.
f
Not detectable.
/-16
-------
I
(—•
-^J
TABLE 7-12
ORGANIC EXTRACT SUMMARY TABLE
Site A quench liquor extract
Tnt al Draantcs rna
TCO.mfl
GRAV. mg
aampw
LCI
0.03
.• i
LC2
0.18
LC3
0.50
LC4
1.70
LCS
16.30
LC6
165.50
LC7
6.90
Z
*
209.71
TABLE 7-13
ORGANIC EXTRACT SUMMARY TABLE
Total Organic*, mg
TCO.mg
GRAV. mg
LCI
0.75
LC2
5.5
LC3
48.6
LC4
23.6
LCS
20.6
LC6
147.3
-
LC7
14.0
s*
281.25
Total Organic*, ing.
TCO.mg
GRAV.mg
TABLE 7-14
ORGANIC EXTRACT SUMMARY TABLE
r , Site A cvclone dust extract
LCI
21.84
LC2
3.53
LC3
0.21
LC4
0.57
LCS
0.52
••• — •«-— ^— ^—
LC6
22.69
LC7
3.76
**
62.09
-------
TABLL /- lb
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
Site A quench liquor extract
Wivt Number
(em'1)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* Spectra are p
were not repo
Intimity
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
"ovided in the "
-ted.
A»ignm«nt/Comm«nti
LC Fraction Number
1 Aliphatic hydrocarbons
2 Alkyl-aryl hydrocarbons
3 Alkyl-aryl hydrocarbons, trace carbonyl ,
possible polycyclics or multi -substituted
aromatics
4 Alkyl-aryl hydrocarbons, possible polycyclics,
-OH present (possibly atmosphere moisture)
5 Phenol + alkyl/dialkyl phenols
6 Principally Phenol + other phenols
7 Phenols
8 Alkyl-aryl CH-stretch, OH, -CO, Methyl Bending
Vibration, Primary OH, possible inorganic
sulfur + other ionic compounds
dditional data" section; wave numbers and intensity
OTHER REMARKS:
7-18
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 7-16
IR REPORT
Site A cyclone dust extract
Wtvt Number
(em'1)
*
*
*
*
*
*
* Spectra are p
were not repo
Intimity
*
*
*
*
*
*
rovided in the "
rted.
Atsignmtnt/Commentt
LC Fraction Number
1 Paraffinic hydrocarbons, considerable branching
2 Paraffinic functional groups, traces of
substituted aromatics
Split carbonyls, esters (formate or butryate),
},4 methyl , isopropyl and tributyl branching,
primary alcohols
5 Aromatics, carbonyls, aliphatic hydrocarbons
6 Split carbonyls; methyl, isopropyl and tributyl
branching; secondary alcohols; esters; possible
5C ring lactones; branched cyclic alcohols
7 (No assignment made)
additional data" section; wave numbers and intensity
OTHER REMARKS:
7-19
-------
TABLE 7- 17
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
Site A tar extract
Wtv« Number
(cm'1)
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* Spectra are p
were not repo
Intensity
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
rovided in the "
rted.
Assignmtnt/Comnuntt
LC Fraction Number
1 Aliphatic hydrocarbons (-CH0-)>4, some branched
2 Substituted aromatic with alkyl and branched
alkyl substituents
3 Substituted aromatic with alkyl and branched
alkyl substituents
4 Same as above plus NH stretch
5 Same as above but probably OH stretch, trace
OO
6 Bonded OH and NH stretch
7 Primary OH, water of hydration, CO ether, ester
(acetate), split carbonyl (possible acid)
8 Split yO° (acid and ester), water of hydration
possible ester (acetate), aliphatic, methyl
group.
idditional data" section; wave numbers and intensity
OTHER REMARKS:
7-20
-------
ADDITIONAL DATA
7-21
-------
Photomicrographs (optical and SEM) were shown for the following samples:
1. Cyclone dust from site A
2. Cyclone dust from site A showing spherical segments
3. Cyclone bottom dust from site A
4. Particulate residue from tar
5. Cyclone dust from site A (bituminous coal), site B (anthracite coal),
and site C (bituminous coal)
6. Same as No. 5 but with different view of field
7. Residue from site A tar (particulates that passed through the cyclone)
8. Dust from site B that passed through the cyclone
9. Deposits on walls of product gas main downstream of the site C cyclone
10. Particulate residue in tar (site C)
7-22
-------
Table 4-1. ORGANICS EXTRACTED FROM SITE A QUENCH LIQUOR
Step
1 Methylene Chloride Extractable
2 Ether Extractable3 at pH 7
3 Ether Extractable at pH 1
TOTAL EXTRACTED
mgM
2231
1457
177
3865
7. of total
extracted
57.7
37.6
4.7
100
aFollowing Step 1
Following Steps 1 and 2
Table 4-6. ORGANIC EXTRACTABLES IN SITE A TAR
Extractables In Tar grams % of sample.
Weight of Sample 0.50209
Weight of Extracted Organics 0.33583 66.9
Loss-on-Extraction/Evaporation 0.16625 33.1
Insoluble Residue 0.0200 4.0*
*3.97. on the medium frit + 0.1% on the filter paper
7-23
-------
Table 4-11. RESULTS OF DRY SCREEN TEST OF SITE A CYCLONE DUST '
Particle size
Sieve No.
10
18
25
40
60
80
100
120
140
200
230
400
-400
(dp |ul)
>2000
>1000
> 710
> 425
> 250
> 111
> 149
> 125
> 106
> 74
> 63
> 37
< -37
Table 4-12. ELEMENTAL COMPOSITION
Element
Carbon
Hydrogen
Nitrogen
Sulfur*
Residue on Ignition
Total (approximate)
(ROD
we %
0.3
0.2
0.1
3.1
18.9
22.3
17.9
6.9
7.6
11.6
3.8
4.6
2.7
OF SITE A
Cumulative
100.0
99. 7
99.5
99.4
96.3
77.4
55.1
37.2
30.3
22.7
11.1
7.3
2.7
CYCLONE DUST
Wt . Percent
84.42
1.62
1.07
0.67
10.19
987,
*Schoeniger flask method includes organic sulfur and soluble
forms of inorganic sulfur.
7-24
-------
Table 5-1. SOURCES OF PARTICULATES
Site
(1) A
(2) A
(3) Bl
(4) B3
(5) Cl
(6) Cl
Fuel
Bituminous
Bituminous
Anthracite
Anthracite
Bituminous
Bituminous
Sampling
Location
Cyclone
Through
Cyclone
Through
Cyclone
Through
Bottom
Cyclone*
Bottom
Cyclone**
Bottom
Cyclone**
* Suspended in tar.
** Removed from gas duct downstream of cyclone.
( ) Numbers relate to columns in Table 5-2.
Table 5-2. COMPARISON OF PARTICULATE MATTER
Sample Location (1)
Key Site A
Nominal**dp, u 170
Moisture
Ash (Dry Baaes) 10. 19
Bulk Density 0.40
(2) (3)
Site A Site Bl
2-20 200.0
10.5
'.7 28
0.93
(4) (5)
Site B3 Site Cl
<1* 95.0
3.3 0
54.73 15.4
0.53
(6)
Site Cl
= 20u
—
10.4
0.31
*Agglotnerated **djo (See Figure 5-1.)
7-25
-------
20QQ
1000
41
6
Q
01
f-t
(J
Sample* S i. t. ^ dso dp o Remark a
(1) A 170 270
(3) BL 200 2000 agglomerated
(5) Cl '^5 200
* See Table 5-1
0.2 0. .'4 0 . h 0.8
M.IM.; Fr.ii-1. i on
L.O
Figure 5-1. SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS OF CYCLONE DUST SAMPLE:
FROM SEVERAL SITES.
7-26
-------
First Extraction
Reproduced from
best available copy.
=^te-^-:^--4
!^:z££—v,j r - rr-::ji--'fri'^ ""^
SpBl Sr
25OO JCOO 1800 '600 UOO WAVENUM6ER (CM I
2Lrr.La?_i -'• ".:_zL,-. :-r.:i -". ~\ •
• 1;:':H
i. i—. .*..
__
il".-t.i..ii;: r-. .:!::-:..•« ..i. ' :: ' i" :"
4-Ji-:-A •./.•-"
,r^:.i4:VM: ._
4000 WAVFKlliwMllCM i I SOD .'OOC
Figure 5-8. METHYLENE CHLORIDE EXTRACT OF QUENCH WATER
Top: Site C Bottom: Site A
7-27
-------
Second Extraction
'
Mt-fV^ :V]
:_J^-3-j- i , H-Jr:.!:.•£:•.: — ! :;i.rir-..t4E^
•-•...'i^il.-.'-.-.&T^L::]. ..-.'t?:. ;. : • ' t; :
.- T. .:; :ur:.:: . -.rr.: .,-.. ."-I' I
i ! ;-,-
-^1--r:.^Mrn^!: i ii _:
-!^T^a:r:i:-&^-;:j
~
h i • I !~:' '
,000 w»vlNUMi«
-------
Third Extraction
Roproducud from
best available copy.
30
40 SO
MICBOM€TEBS BO
16 20 25 50
-rtT-;!. t;";:-~-'1 " j
i. - .I
'
! | : .
^J1.^_ ._ I- ..
*J^ ;. '.::i
toot
• dEiLiuEns t.S£':i: Jnztiirx-F: -Oi-g
- - - - -
slSS-atlr i •,-••
~S::ri.\,-.-\- •
._s!V.i:l • =•_•: H: -...••.
^ I - -• f- !l - 1 il*-r i -' —LjLfl •'"' l»"li-l'-i-''\- J,l | I .•...-...! I " - '
••.-.T-r«'iT *^fp —°(>'~ •-'••!•• ;-' ' • r-r*0 ' "... , : »0 r-^—i—
—I—;£•••;» - • - f . . '\ : • . i . -K
W P IS ;aS- -^\v*^
_44j Ll.
•':.:•" i . rn •'..•.!:' .'. . r nrr/Vjr
ttl ^/-.-,~.^. m --Ah
i. I
^P^o;>y't^;/-^W^---'^ 'j. .'.;.r=i—-U ":!'::i.:';.-; r!--^-^-^':-' r'i-
i.^^:ir:l:r-^TJ.^fcg'jKi-M -r- ;-y:.; ^- : ..rl'..-^.:.: r.:_ /\j , -...:?-. Jii:.:.:
ip'^rii''4':-' ^ i^iir :'.; •. ' ..;"i • ^: ••-.£. i - rr"r-; ." ._:•;.-: eTFT.- ~ ^s= .-.>•.; •-:.
—-?o---—: '•—?i —
<000 WAV(NUMI(R ICM
:s:o jcoo noo uso u3o w»vtNuw«ta io»> i ?ao »oo
Figure 5-10. ETHER EXTRACT OF ACIDIFIED QUENCH WATER
Top: Site C Bottom: Site A
7-29
------- |