PB80-219553
Compilation of Environmental Assessment Data
February 1978-March 1979. Volume II
Studies 8 and 9
Research Triangle Inst.
Research Triangle Park, NC
Prepared for
Industrial Environmental Research Lab
Research Triangle Park, NC
-Aug 80
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Technical Information Service
-------
p r B n _ 31 =s c c ~:
EPA 600/2-80-175b
Aug. 1980
COMPILATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT DATA
February 1978-March 1979
Volume II, Studies 8 and 9
by
N. G. Sexton
L. I. Southerland
Systems & Measurements Division
Research Triangle Institute
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
EPA Contract No. 68-02-2688
Task Directive No. 11200
EPA Project Officer: L. D. Johnson
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711
Prepared for
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Office of Research and Development
Washington, DC 20460
-------
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-6QQ/2-80-175 b
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
frlcate read friifrvction? on the reverse
2,
IERL-RTP-1074
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Compilation of Environmental Assessment Data,
February 1978-March 1979; Vol. H, Studies 8 and 9
5. REPORT DATE
^August 1980 Issuing dAte
6. PbnFORMING ORGANIZATION COOE
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
'. AUTHOfl(S)' ~~
N.G. Sexton and L,I. Southerland
B. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT MO.
RTI/1699-12/01S
9- PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAMS AND ADDflESS
Research Triangle Institute
P.O. Box 12194
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
tO, PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
OC2JN1E
1V. CONTRACT/GRANT NO,
68-02-2688,
Task Directive 11200
AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
EPA, Office of Research and Development
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND P6
Final: 2/78 - 3/79
fllOD COVERED
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/13
project officer is L.D. Johnson, MD-62 919/541-
«. * R?Port EPA-600/2-78-211 to an earlier report compiling similar data between
the start of the program and 3/78, ^
TRACT The three.volume report compiles all data from EPA/IERL-RTP's phased
environmental assessment program for the period 2/78-3/79. It includes data from
14 environmental assessment studies, compiled in standard format. The formatted
Level 1 data are organized within each study by the analytical technique used to, gen-
erate the data. Inorganic data as generated by spark source mass spectroscopy, '
atomic absorption, gas chromatography, chemiluminescence for oxides of nitrogen,
anion analysis, and aqueous analysis precede the organic data generated by gas
chromatography for C1-C6/C7 or C7-C17, liquid chromatographic fractionation,
infrared spectroscopy, and low resolution mass spectroscopy. Sampling and analy-
tical techniques that were used, that are not specified in Level 1, are documented
in the summaries and data pages. Each Level 1 data section Is followed by a Level 2
data section and/or an additional data section. Tables and figures in the Level 2 and
additional data sections have been reproduced from the documents originally publis-
hed by the organization conducting the study. The studies are organized by indus-
trial type: (Vol. I) chemically active fluidized-bed combustion, coal-fired boiler and
oil-fired boiler, coal-fired power plant, and coal gasifier; (VoL H) coke production,
and ferroalloy process; and (Vol. m) the remaining industrial processes.
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
Pollution
Assessments
Chemical Analysis
Sampling
[13. 2ISTHIBUTION STATEMENT
Release to Public
EPA Form 1220-1 (9-73)
b.lDENTIPIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
Pollution Control
Stationary Sources
Environmental Assess-
ment
Level 1 Data
Chemical Data
19, SECURITY CLASS (Thu Report)
Unclassified
20. SECURITY CLASS (This page)
Unclassified
c. cos AT i Field/Croup
13B
14B
07D
. NO, OF PAGES
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Industrial Environmental Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for pub-
lication. Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily reflect the
views and policies of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement
or recommendation for use.
/•a,
-------
ABSTRACT
This document compiles all available data from the 1ER.L Phased Environr
mental Assessment Program for the period February 1978 through March 1979.
This document follows an earlier publication, EPA-600/2-78-211, Compilation
of Level 1 Environmental Assessment Data, which compiled all available chemical
data from the inception of the Environmental Assessment Program through
March 1978.
Available data from 14 environmental assessment studies are compiled in
this document in standard formats. The formatted Level 1 data are organized
within each study by the analytical technique used to generate the data.
Inorganic data as generated by spark source mass spectroscopy, atomic absorp-
tion, gas chromatography, chemiluminescence for oxides of nitrogen, anion
analysis, and aqueous analysis precede the organic data generated by gas
chromatography for Ci-Cg/C? or C7-C17, liquid chromatographic fractionation,
infrared spectroscopy, and low resolution mass spectroscopy. Sampling and
analytical techniques that were used that are not specified in Level 1 are
documented in the summaries and data pages.
Each Level 1 data section is followed by a Level 2 data section and/or an
additional data section. The tables and figures in the Level 2 and additional
data sections have been reproduced from the documents originally published by
the organization conducting the study.
Each study is introduced by a summary, which is followed by the data
generated in that study. The studies are organized by industrial type as
follows: Chemically Active Fluidized-Bed Combustion, Coal-Fired Boiler and
Oil-Fired Boiler, Coal-Fired Power Plant, Coal Gasifier, Coke Production,
Ferroalloy Process, Internal Combustion Engine, Iron and Steel Mills, Residen-
tial Heating, Shale Oil Retorting, and Textiles.
ii
-------
CONTENTS
Abstract ii
Figures v
Tables V1.
Introduction *xl
Chemically Active Fluidized Bed Combustor
Study 1. Level 2 Chemical Analysis of Fluidized-Bed
Combustor Samples 1-1*
Study 2. Preliminary Environmental Assessment of the
Lignite-Fired CAFB 2-1*
Coal-Fired Boiler and Oil-Fired Boiler
Study 3. Environmental Assessment of Coal and Oil Firing
in a Controlled Industrial Boiler,
Volumes I-III 3-1*
Coal-Fired Power Plant
Study 4. Air Emissions From Combustion of Solvent Refined
Coal 4-1*
Study 5. Characterization of Coal Pile Drainage 5-1*
Study 6. Level 1 Assessment of Limestone Scrubbing With
Adipic Acid Addition 6-1*
Coal Gasification
Study 7. Analyses of Grab Samples for Fixed-Bed Coal
Gasification Processes 7-1*
Coke Production
Study 8. Environmental Assessment of Coke By-Product
Recovery Plants 8-1
Ferroalloy Process
Study 9. Ferroalloy Process Emissions Measurement 9-1
Internal Combustion Engines
Study 10. Emissions Assessment of Conventional Stationary
Combustion Systems, Volume II 10-lf
Iron and Steel Mills
Study 11. Assessment of Surface Run Off From Iron and
Steel Mills 11-It
-------
CONTENTS (continued)
Residential Heating
Study 12. Source Assessment: Coal-Fired Residential
Combustion Equipment Field Tests, June 1977 .... 12-If
Shale Oil Retorting
Study 13. Sampling and Analysis Research Program at the
Paraho Shale Oil Demonstration Plant,
Volume II 13-It
Texti1es
Study 14. Source Assessment: Textile Plant Wastewater Toxics
Study, Phase II 14-It
*In Volume I.
tin Volume III.
IV
-------
FIGURES
Number Page
STUDY 8
8-1 Flowplan and material balance of a representative
coke by-product recovery plant 8-4
STUDY 9
9~1 Gas cleaning system 9-3
-------
TABLES
Number
STUDY 8
8-1 Coke By-Product Recovery Plants Pollutant Sources 8-5
Level 1
8-2 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Biological Plant
Sludge Sample 8~8
8-3 Sulfur Species, Froth Flotation Separator 8-9
8-4 Sulfur Species, Final Cooling Tower 8-9
8-5 Sulfur Species, Tar Storage Tank 8-9
8-6 Sulfur Species, Tar Decanter Tank 8-9
8-7 Sulfur Species, Light Oil Storage Tank 8-10
8-8 Sulfur Species, Chemical Oil Storage Tank 8-10
8-9 Sulfur Species, Coke Oven Gas 8-10
8-10 Sulfur Species, Primary Cooler Condensate Tank 8-10
8-11 Sulfur Species, Upwind Ambient Trailer Location 8-11
8-12 Sulfur Species, Downwind Ambient Chem Lab Site 8-11
8-13 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Froth Flotation
Separator 8-12
8-14 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Final Cooling Tower 8-12
8-15 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Tar Storage Tank 8-13
8-16 Gas Chrojnatography Analysis, Tar Decanter Tank 8-13
8-17 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Light Oil Storage Tank 8-14
8-18 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Chemical Oil Storage Tank. . . . 8-14
8-19 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Coke Oven Gas 8-15
8-20 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Primary Cooler Condensate
Tank 8-15
8-21 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Upwind Ambient Trailer
Location 8"16
8-22 Gas Chromatography Analysis, Downwind Ambient Chem
Lab Site 8-16
8-23 Organic Analysis, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 8-17
8-24 Organic Analysis, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 8-18
8-25 Organic Analysis, Froth Flotation Separator, XAD-2
Resin 8~19
8-26 Organic Analysis, Froth Flotation Separator, Canister
Rinse 8~20
8-27 Organic Analysis, Final Cooler Cooling Tower,
XAD-2 Resin 8"21
8-28 LC Fractionation, Final Cooler Cooling Tower, Canister
Rinse 8"22
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
8-29 Organic Analysis, Final Cooler Cooling Tower, Hot Well,
pH 2 . 8-23
8-30 Organic Analysis, Final Cooler Cooling Tower, Hot Well,
pH 12 8-24
8-31 Organic Analysis, Final Cooler Cooling Tower, Cold
Well, pH 2 8-25
8-32 Organic Analysis, Final Cooler Cooling Tower, Cold
Well, pH 12 8-26
8-33 Organic Analysis, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
XAD-2 Resin 8-27
8-34 Organic Analysis, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
Canister Rinse 8-28
8-35 Organic Analysis, Tar Decanter Vapor, XAD-2 Resin 8-29
8-36 Organic Analysis, Tar Decanter Vapor, Canister Rinse 8-30
8-37 Organic Analysis, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate Extract
pH 2 8-31
8-38 Organic Analysis, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate Extract
pH 12 8-32
8-39 Organic Analysis, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
XAD-2 Resin 8-33
8-40 Organic Analysis, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
Canister Rinse 8-34
8-41 Organic Analysis, Upwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin 8-35
8-42 LC Fractionation, Upwind Ambient, Canister Rinse 8-36
8-43 LC Fractionation, Downwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin 8-37
8-44 LC Fractionation, Downwind Ambient, Canister Rinse 8-38
8-45 Organic Analysis Biological Treatment Plant Sludge,
pH 7 Extract 8-39
8-46 IR Report, 8A-P, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
Preliminary IR 8-40
8-47 IR Report, 8A-C, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
Concentrate IR 8-41
8-48 IR Report, 8A-LC1, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #1 IR 8-42
8-49 IR Report, 8A-LC2, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #2 IR 8-43
8-50 IR Report, 8A-LC3, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #3 IR 8-44
8-51 IR Report, 8A-LC4, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #4 IR 8'45
8-52 IR Report, 8A-LC5, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #5 IR 8-46
8-53 IR Report, 8A-LC6, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #6 IR 8-47
8-54 IR Report, 8A-LC7, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #7 IR 8-48
8-55 IR Report, 8B-P, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
Preliminary IR 8-49
vn
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
8-56 IR Report, 8B-C, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
Concentrate IR 8-50
8-57 IR Report, 88-LCI, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
LC Cut #1 IR 8-51
8-58 IR Report, 8B-LC2, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
LC Cut #2 IR 8-52
8-59 IR Report, 8B-LC3, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
LC Cut #3 IR 8-53
8-60 IR Report, 8B-LC4, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
LC Cut #4 IR 8-54
8-61 IR Report, 8B-LC5, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
LC Cut #5 IR 8-55
8-62 IR Report, 8B-LC5, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
LC Cut #5 IR 8-56
8-63 IR Report, 8B-LC6, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
LC Cut #6 IR 8-57
8-64 IR Report, 8B-LC7, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
LC Cut #7 IR 8-58
8-65 IR Report, Froth Flotation Separator: XAO-2 Resin,
Preliminary IR Analysis 8-59
8-66 IR Report, Froth Flotation Separator, XAD-2 Resin,
IR on Concentrate 8-60
8-67 IR Report, Froth Flotation Separator, XAD-2 Resin,
LC Cut #1 IR 8-61
8-68 IR Report, Froth Flotation Separator, XAD-2 Resin,
LC Cut #2 IR 8-62
8-69 IR Report, Froth Flotation Separator, XAD-2 Resin,
LC Cut #3 IR 8-63
8-70 IR Report, Froth Flotation Separator, XAD-2 Resin,
LC Cut #4 IR 8-64
8-71 IR Report, Froth Flotation Separator, XAD-2 Resin,
LC Cut #5 IR 8-65
8-72 IR Report, Froth Flotation Separator, XAD-2 Resin,
LC Cut #6 IR 8-66
8-73 IR Report, Froth Flotation Separator, XAD-2 Resin,
LC Cut #7 IR 8-67
8-74 IR Report, 1XR-P, Froth Flotation Separator, Canister
Rinse: Preliminary IR 8-68
8-75 IR Report, 1XR-C, Froth Flotation Separator, Canister
Rinse: Concentrate IR 8-69
8-76 IR Report, 1XR-LC1, Froth Flotation Separator, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #1 IR 8-70
8-77 IR Report, 1XR-LC2, Froth Flotation Separator, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #2 IR 8-71
8-78 IR Report, 1XR-LC3, Froth Flotation Separator, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #3 IR . 8-72
8-79 IR Report, 1XR-LC4, Froth Flotation Separator, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #4 IR 8-73
vm
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
8-80 IR Report, 1XR-LC5, Froth Flotation Separator, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #5 IR . 8-74
8-81 IR Report, 1XR-LC6, Froth Flotation Separator, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #6 IR 8-75
8-82 IR Report, 1XR-LC7, Froth Flotation Separator, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #7 IR . 8-76
8-83 IR Report, 2X-P, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Vapor,
XAD-2 Resin: Preliminary IR 8-77
8-84 IR Report, 2X-C, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Vapor,
XAD-2 Resin: Concentrate IR 8-78
8-85 IR Report, 2X-LC1, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Vapor,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #1 IR 8-79
8-86 IR Report, 2X-LC2, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Vapor,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #2 IR . . . 8-80
8-87 IR Report, 2X-LC3, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Vapor,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #3 IR 8-81
8-88 IR Report, 2X-LC4, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Vapor,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #4 IR 8-82
8-89 IR Report, 2X-LC5, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Vapor,
XAO-2 Resin: LC Cut #5 IR 8-83
8-90 IR Report, 2X-LC6, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Vapor,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #6 IR 8-84
8-91 IR Report, 2X-LC7, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Vapor,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #7 IR . •'. 8-85
8-92 IR Report, 2XR-P, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Vapor,
Canister Rinse: Preliminary IR 8-86
8-93 IR Report, 2XR-C, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Vapor,
Canister Rinse: Concentrate IR 8-87
8-94 IR Report, 9A-C, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 2 Extract: Concentrate IR 8-88
8-95 IR Report, 9A-LC1, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #1 IR. . . 8-89
8-96 IR Report, 9A-LC2, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #2 IR 8-90
8-97 IR Report, 9A-LC3, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #3 IR 8-91
8-98 IR Report, 9A-LC4, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #4 IR 8-92
8-99 IR Report, 9A-LC5, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #5 IR 8-93
8-100 IR Report, 9A-LC6, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #6 IR ' 8-94
8-101 IR Report, 9A-LC7, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #7 IR 8-95
8-102 IR Report, 9B-P, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 12 Extract: Preliminary IR 8-96
8-103 IR Report, 9B-C, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 12 Extract: Concentrate IR 8-97
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
8-104 IR Report, 9B-LC1, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #1 IR 8-98
8-105 IR Report, 9B-LC2, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #2 IR 8-99
8-106 IR Report, 9B-LC3, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #3 IR 8-100
8-107 IR Report, 9B-LC3, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #3 IR 8-101
8-108 IR Report, 9B-LC4, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #4 IR 8-102
8-109 IR Report, 9B-LC5, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #5 IR 8-103
8-110 IR Report, 9B-LC6, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #6 IR 8-104
8-111 IR Report, 9B-LC7, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot Well,
pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #7 IR 8-105
8-112 IR Report, 10A-P, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold Well,
pH 2 Extract: Preliminary IR 8-106
8-113 IR Report, 10A-C, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold Well,
pH 2 Extract: Concentrate IR 8-107
8-114 IR Report, 10A-LC1, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #1 IR 8-108
8-115 IR Report, 10A-LC2, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold Well, .
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #2 IR 8-109
8-116 IR Report, 10A-LC3, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #3 IR 8-110
8-117 IR Report, 10A-LC4, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #4 IR 8-111
8-118 IR Report, 10A-LC5, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #5 IR 8-112
8-119 IR Report, 10A-6, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #6 IR 8-113
8-120 IR Report, 10A-LC7, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold Well,
pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #7 IR 8-114
8-121 IR Report, 10B-C, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold Well,
pH 12 Extract: Concentrate IR 8-115
8-122 IR Report, 108-LCI,,Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold
Well, pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #1 IR 8-116
8-123 IR Report, 10B-LC2, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold
Well, pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #2 IR 8-117
8-124 IR Report, 10B-LC3, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold
Well, pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #3 IR 8-118
8-125 IR Report, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold Well,
pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #4 IR 8-119
8-126 IR Report, 10B-LC5, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold
Well, pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #5 IR 8-120
8-127 IR Report, 10B-LC6, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold
Well, pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #6 IR 8-121
8-128 IR Report, 10B-LC7, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Cold Well,
pH 12 Extract: LC Cut #7 IR 8-122
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
8-129 IR Report, 3X-P, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank, XAD-2
Resin: Preliminary IR . 8-123
8-130 IR Report, 3X-C, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank, XAD-2
Resin: Concentrate IR 8-124
8-131 IR Report, 3X-LC1, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank, XAD-2
Resin: LC Cut #1 IR "... 8-125
8-132 IR Report, 3X-LC2, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank, XAD-2
Resin: LC Cut #2 IR 8-126
8-133 IR Report, 3X-LC3, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank, XAD-2
Resin: LC Cut #3 IR 8-127
8-134 IR Report, 3X-LC4, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #4 IR 8-128
8-135 IR Report, 3X-LC5, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #5 IR 8-129
8-136 IR Report, 3X-LC6, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #6 IR 8-130
8-137 IR Report, 3X-LC7, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #7 IR 8-131
8-138 IR Report, 3XR-C, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
Canister Rinse: Concentrate IR 8-132
8-139 IR Report, 3XR-LC1, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #1 IR 8-133
8-140 IR Report, 3XR-LC2, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #2 IR. 8-134
8-141 IR Report, 3XR-LC3, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #3 IR 8-135
8-142 IR Report, 3XR-LC4, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #4 IR 8-136
8-143 IR Report, 3XR-LC5, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #5 IR 8-137
8-144 IR Report, 3XR-LC6, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #6 IR 8-138
8-145 IR Report, 3XR-LC7, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #7 IR 8-139
8-146 IR Report, 4X-P, Tar Decanter Vapor, XAD-2 Resin:
Preliminary IR 8-140
8-147 IR Report, 4X-R, Tar Decanter Vapor, XAD-2 Resin:
Concentrate IR 8-141
8-148 IR Report, 4X-LC1, Tar Decanter Vapor, XAD-2 Resin:
LC Cut #1 IR 8-142
8-149 IR Report, 4X-LC2, Tar Decanter Vapor, XAD-2 Resin:
LC Cut #2 IR ' 8-143
8-150 IR Report, 4X-LC3, Tar Decanter Vapor, XAO-2 Resin:
LC Cut #3 IR 8-144
8-151 IR Report, 4X-LC4, Tar Decanter Vapor, XAD-2 Resin:
LC Cut #4 IR 8-145
8-152 IR Report, 4X-LC5, Tar Decanter Vapor, XAD-2 Resin:
LC Cut #5 IR 8-146
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
8-153 IR Report, 4X-LC6, Tar Decanter Vapor, XAO-2 Resin:
LC Cut #6 IR 8-147
8-154 IR Report, 4X-7, Tar Decanter Vapor, XAD-2 Resin:
LC Cut #7 IR 8-148"
8-155 IR Report, 4XR-P, Tar Decanter Vapor, Canister Rinse: .
Preliminary IR 8-149
8-156 IR Report, 4XR-C, Tar Decanter Vapor, Canister Rinse:
Concentrate IR 8-150
8-157 IR Report, 4XR-LC1, Tar Decanter Vapor, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #1 IR 8-151
8-158 IR Report, 4XR-LC2, Tar Decanter Vapor, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #2 IR 8-152
8-159 IR Report, 4XR-U3, Tar Decanter Vapor, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #3 IR 8-153
8-160 IR Report, 4XR-LC4, Tar Decanter Vapor, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #4 IR 8-154
8-161 IR Report, 4XR-LC5, Tar Decanter Vapor, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #5 IR 8-155
8-162 IR Report, 4XR-LC6, Tar Decanter Vapor, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #6 IR 8-156
8-163 IR Report, 4XR-LC7, Tar Decanter Vapor, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #7 IR 8-157
8-164 IR Report, 11A-P, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 2: Preliminary IR. . . . 8-158
8-165 IR Report, 11A-C, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 2: Concentrate IR. . 8-159
8-166 IR Report, 11A-LC1, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 2: LC Cut #1 IR 8-160
8-167 IR Report, 11A-LC2, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 2: LC Cut #2 IR 8-161
8-168 IR Report, 11A-LC3, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 2: LC Cut #3 IR 8-162
8-169 IR Report, 11A-LC4, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 2: LC Cut #4 IR 8-163
8-170 IR Report, 11A-LC5, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 2: LC Cut #5 IR 8-164
8-171 IR Report, 11A-LC6, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 2: LC Cut #6 IR 8-165
8-172 IR Report, 11A-LC7, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 2: LC Cut #7 IR 8-166
8-173 IR Report, 11B-P, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 12: Preliminary IR 8-167
8-174 IR Report, 11B-C, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 12: Concentrate IR 8-168
8-175 IR Report, 11B-LC1, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 12: LC Cut #1 IR 8-169
8-176 IR Report, 11B-LC2, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 12: LC Cut #2 IR 8-170
XII
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
8-177 IR Report, 11B-LC3, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 12: LC Cut #3 IR 8-171
8-178 IR Report, 11B-LC4, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 12: LC Cut #4 IR 8-172"
8-179 IR Report, 11B-LC5, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 12: LC Cut #5 IR 8-173
8-180 IR Report, 11B-LC6, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 12: LC Cut #6 IR 8-174
8-181 IR Report, 11B-LC7, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract pH 12: LC Cut #7 IR 8-175
8-182 IR Report, 5X-P, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank, XAD-2
Resin: Preliminary IR 8-176
8-183 IR Report, 5X-C, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank, XAD-2
Resin: Concentrate IR 8-177
8-184 IR Report, 5X-LC1, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #1 IR 8-178
8-185 IR Report, 5X-LC2, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #2 IR 8-179
8-186 IR Report, 5X-LC3, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #3 IR 8-180
8-187 IR Report, 5X-LC4, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #4 IR 8-181
•8-188 IR Report, 5X-LC5, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #5 IR . 8-182
8-189 IR Report, 5X-LC6, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #6 IR 8-183
8-190 IR Report, 5X-LC7, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
XAD-2 Resin: LC Cut #7 IR 8-184
8-191 IR Report, 5XR-P, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
Canister Rinse: Preliminary IR 8-185
8-192 IR Report, 5XR-C, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
Canister Rinse: Concentrate IR 8-186
8-193 IR Report, 5XR-LC1, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #1 IR 8-187
8-194 IR Report, 5XR-LC2, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #2 IR 8-188
8-195 IR Report, 5XR-LC3, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #3 IR 8-189
8-196 IR Report, 5XR-LC4, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #4 IR 8-190
8-197 IR Report, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank, Canister
Rinse: LC Cut #5 IR ' 8-191
8-198 IR Reportm 5XR-LC6, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #6 IR 8-192
8-199 IR Report, 5XR-LC7, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
Canister Rinse: LC Cut #7 IR 8-193
8-200 IR Report, 7X-P, Upwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin:
Preliminary IR 8-194
XTM
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number Page
8-201 IR Report, 7X-C, Upwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin:
Concentrate IR 8-195
8-202 IR Report, 7X-LC1, Upwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin:
LC Cut #1 IR 8-196
8-203 IR Report, 7X-LC2, Upwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin:
LC Cut #2 IR "... 8-197
8-204 IR Report, 7X-LC3, Upwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin:
LC Cut #3 IR 8-198
8-205 IR Report, 7X-LC4, Upwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin:
LC Cut #4 IR 8-199
8-206 IR Report, 7X-LC5, Upwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin:
LC Cut #5 IR 8-200
8-207 IR Report, 7X-LC6, Upwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin:
LC Cut #6 IR 8-201
8-208 IR Report, 7X-LC7, Upwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin:
LC Cut #7 IR 8-202
8-209 IR Report, 6X-P, Downwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin:
Preliminary IR 8-203
8-210 IR Report, 7XR-C, Upwind Ambient, Canister Rinse:
Concentrate IR 8-204
8-211 IR Report, 6X-C, Downwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin:
Concentrate IR 8-205
8-212 IR Report, 6XR-C, Can Rinse #6, Downwind Ambient,
Canister Rinse: Concentrate IR 8-206
8-213 IR Report, 12-P Biological Sludge; Biological Treatment
Plant Sludge, pH 7 Extract: Preliminary IR 8-207
8-214 IR Report, 12-C Biological Treatment Plant Sludge,
pH 7 Extract: Concentrate IR 8-208
8-215 IR Report, 12-LC1, Biological Treatment Plant Sludge,
pH 7 Extract: LC Cut #1 IR 8-209
8-216 IR Report, 12-LC2, Biological Treatment Plant Sludge,
pH 7 Extract: LC Cut #2 IR 8-210
8-217 IR Report, 12-LC3, Biological Treatment Plant Sludge,
pH 7 Extract: LC Cut #3 IR 8-211
8-218 IR Report, 12-LC4, Biological Treatment Plant Sludge,
pH 7 Extract: LC Cut #4 IR 8-212
8-219 IR Report, 12-LC5, Biological Treatment Plant Sludge,
pH 7 Extract: LC Cut #5 IR 8-213
8-220 IR Report, 12-LC6, Biological Treatment Plant Sludge,
pH 7 Extract: LC Cut #6 IR 8-214
8-221 IR Report, 12-LC7, Biological Treatment Plant Sludge,
pH 7 Extract: LC Cut #7 IR 8-215
8-222 LRMS Report, 9A-LC2, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot
Well, pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #2 LRMS 8-216
8-223 LRMS Report, 9A-LC6, Final Cooler Cooling Tower Hot
Well, pH 2 Extract: LC Cut #6 LRMS 8-217
8-224 LRMS Report, 8A-LC1, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #1 LRMS 8-218
xiv
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
8-225 LRMS Report, 8A-LC2, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #2 LRMS 8"219
8-226 LRMS Report, 8A-LC3, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #3 LRMS 8-220
8-227 LRMS Report, 8A-LC4, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #4 LRMS 8-221
8-228 LRMS Report, 8A-LC7, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #5 LRMS 8-222
8-229 LRMS Report, 8A-LC6, Ammonia Liquor, pH 2 Extract:
LC Cut #6 LRMS 8-223
8-230 LRMS Report, 8B-LC3, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
LC Cut #3 LRMS 8-224
8-231 LRMS Report, 8B-LC4, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
LC Cut #4 LRMS 8-225
8-232 LRMS Report, 8B-LC6, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
LC Cut #6 LRMS .'•...• • • •• 8-226"
8-233 LRMS Report, 8B-LC7, Ammonia Liquor, pH 12 Extract:
LC Cut #7 LRMS " 8-227
Additional Data
14 Pollutants From By-Product Recovery Plant ... 8-229
15 Summary of Organic Analysis, Tar Decanter Vapor 8-230
16 Summary of Organic Analysis, Primary Cooler Condensate
Tank Vent - 8-232
17 Summary of Organic Analysis, Vapor Above Tar Storage
Tank 8"233
18 Summary of Organic Analysis, Vapor Above Chemical Oil
Tank °"23|
19 Summary of Organic Analysis, Froth Flotation Separator. . . . 8-236
20 Summary of Organic Analysis, Final Cooler Cooling
Tower Vapor °-237
22 Summary of Organic Analysis, Light Oil Storage 8-239
25 Summary of Organic Analyses, Biological Treatment
Plant Sludge 8-240
26 Biological Treatment Plant Testing, Selected Results 8-241
28 Summary of Organic Analysis, Upwind Ambient 8-242
29 Summary of Organic Analysis, Downwind Ambient 8-243
30 Estimated Relative Hazard of Coke By-Product Plant
Sources f
A-4 Aromatic Analysis, Froth Flotation Sample 8-
A-28 Aromatic Analysis, Onsite Analysis of Final Cooling Tower . . 8-245
A-87 Aromatic Analysis, Tar Storage Tank 8-245
A-109 Aromatic Analysis, Tar Decanter Tank 8-246
A-150 Aromatic Analysis, Light Oil Storage Tank 8-246
A-152 Aromatic Analysis, Chemical Storage Tank 8-246
A-173 Aromatic Analysis, Coke Oven Gas 8-247
A-174 Aromatic Analysis, Primary Cooler Condensate Samples-
A-180 Aromatic Analysis, Upwind Ambient Trailer Location
xv
-------
A-194 Aromatic Analysis, Downwind Ambient Chem Lab Site 8-248
A-3 Froth Flotation Separator Sample 8-249
A-5 Mate Comparison Values, Froth Flotation Separator,
XAD-2 Resin 8-250
A-15 Mate Comparison Values, Froth Flotation Separator,
Canister Rinse 8-251
A-25 Cyanide Gas Train Data 8-252
A-26 Gas Train Data Sheet, Run #1 8-253
A-27 Gas Train Data Sheet, Run #2 . 8-254
A^29 SASS Train Data Sheet 8-255
A-30 MATE Comparison Values, Final Cooler Cooling Tower,
XAD-2 Resin 8-256
A-86 SASS Train Data Sheet 8-257
A-88 MATE Comparison Values, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
XAD-2 Resin 8-258
A-98 MATE Comparison Values, Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank,
Canister Rinse 8-259
A-108 SASS Train Data Sheet 8-260
A-110 MATE Comparison Values, Tar Decanter Vapor, XAD-2 Resin . . . 8-261
A-120 MATE Comparison Values, Tar Decanter Vapor, Canister
Rinse 8-262
A-130 MATE Comparison Values, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract, pH 2 8-263
A-140 MATE Comparison Values, Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate
Extract, pH 12 '. 8-264
A-151 SASS Train Data Sheet 8-265
A-153 MATE Comparison Values, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
XAD-2 Resin 8-266
A-163 MATE Comparison Values, Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank,
Canister Rinse 8-267
A-175 Ambient Data Sheet 8-268
A-176 Ambient Data Sheet 8-269
A-177 Ambient Data Sheet 8-270
A-178 Ambient Data Sheet 8-271
A-179 SASS Train Data Sheet 8-272
A-181 Organic Extract Summary, Upwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin .... 8-273
A-193 SASS Train Data Sheet 8-274
A-231 Organic Extract Summary, Biological Treatment Plant
Sludge, pH 7 Extract 8-275
STUDY 9
9-1 Sample Characterization 9-2
9-2 Sample Series I 9-5
9-3 Sample Series II 9-6
9-4 Other Samples 9-7
Level 1
9-5 Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Total Inorganics,
Silicomanganese Series, Sample No. Series I 9-9
xvi
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
9-6
9-7
9-8
9-9
9-10
9-11
9-12
9-13
9-14
9-15
9-16
9-17
9-18
9-19
9-20
9-21
9-22
9-23
9-24
9-25
9-26
9-27
9-28
9-29
9-30
9-31
9-32
9-33
9-34
9-35
9-36
9-37
9-38
9-39
9-40
9-41
9-42
9-43
9-44
9-45
9-46
9-47
9-48
Page
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Total Inorganics,
Ferromanganese Series, Sample No. Series II. 9-10
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Sample No.
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Sample No.
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy
IC3 + 10
IC1 + F. .
IPW. . . .
IX . . . .
I imp 1. .
IIC3 + 10.
9-11
9-12
9-13
9-14
9-15
9-16
Sample No.
Sample No.
Sample No.
Sample No.
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Sample No. IIC1 + F,
Sample No. II GIF 9-17
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Sample No. II PW 9-18
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Sample No.: II X 9-19
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Sample No.: II imp 1 .... 9-20
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Coal 9-21
Spark Source Mass Spectroscopy, Coke 9-22
Atomic Absorption Analysis, Silicomanganese Series 9-23
Atomic Absorption Analysis, Ferromanganese Series 9-23
Atomic Absorption Analysis 9-23
LC Fractionation, IX, XAO-2 Extract 9-24
ISC, Sorbent Condensate 9-25
IIX, XAD-2 Extract 9-26
IICIF Particulates < lu 9-27
IIPW: Probe Wash 9-28
Coal (CL) 9-29
Coke (CK) 9-30
Solvent Blank, B 9-31
Blank, Methylene Chloride 9-32
LC Fractionation, Blank, Methylene Chloride/Methanol 9-33
IR Report, ICS-7, LL7, Sorb cmd Venturi Scrubber 9-34
IR Report, IIC310, Cone. Extract, Particulates >3 m,
Ferromanganese 9-35
IR Report, II C1F, Cone. Extract, Particulates >1 m,
Ferromanganese 9-36
IR Report, IIX, Cone. Extract, XAD-2 Ferromanganese 9-37
IR Report, IISC, Cone. Extract, Sorbent Condensate,
Ferromanganese 9-38
LC Fractionation,
LC Fractionation,
LC Fractionation,
LC Fractionation,
LC Fractionation,
LC Fractionation,
LC Fractionation,
LC Fractionation,
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
CL-7 Coal 9-39
IX-1, LCI, XAD Extract, Venturi Scrubber 9-40
IX-3, LC3, XAD Extract, Venturi Scrubber 9-40
IX-6, LC-6, XAD Extract, Venturi Scrubber 9-41
Venturi Scrubber .... 9-42
Venturi Scrubber . . .
Venturi Scrubber . . .
LC-6
ISC-1, LCI
ISC-2, LC2
ISC-3
ISC-4
ISC-6
IIX-1
LC3,
LC4,
LC6,
LCI,
Sorbent Cond.
Sorbent Cond.
Sorbent Cond.
Sorbent Cond.
Sorbent Cond.
XAD Extract,
9-42
9-43
9-43
9-44
Ferroalloy 9-44
Venturi Scrubber
Venturi Scrubber
IIX-2, LC2, XAD Extract, Ferromanganese 9-45
IR Report, IIX-3, LC3, XAD Extract, Ferromanganese 9-45
xvn
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
9-49
9-50
9-51
9-52
9-53
9-54
9-55
9-56
9-57
5-58
9-59
9-60
9-61
Page
9-84
9-85
9-86
9-87
9-88
9-89
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IIX-4, LC4, XAD Extract, Ferromanganese 9-
IIX-5, LC5, XAD Extract, Ferromanganese 9-
IIX-6, LC6, XAD Extract,
IICIF-1, Particulates <]
IICIF-5, Particulates <]
IICIF-6, Particulates <]
IIPW-1, LCI, Probe Wash,
Ferromanganese.
u, Ferromanganese
p, Ferromanganese
u, Ferromanganese
Ferromanganese.
IIPW-2, LC2, Probe Wash, Ferromanganese 9-
46
46
47
47
48
48
49
49
50
50
IIPW-6, LC6, Probe Wash, Ferromanganese 9
II PW-7, Probe Wash, Ferromanganese 9
IR Report, IC310 Cone. Extract, Particulate >3 u,
Silicomanganese 9-51
IR Report, ICIF Particulates <1 n, Cone. Extract
Silicomanganese 9
IR Report, IPW, Cone. Extract, Probe Wash,
Silicomanganese 9
IR Report, IX, Cone. Extract, XAD-2, Silicomanganese 9
IR Report, ISC, Cone. Extract, Sorbent Condensate,
Silicomanganese 9-
II PW, Probe Wash, Ferromanganese 9-
9-62
9-63
9-64
9-65
9-66
9-67
9-68
9-69
9-70
9-71
9-72
9-73
9-74
9-75
9-76
9-77
9-78
9-79
9-80
9-81
9-82
9-83
IR Report
IR Report
Silicoi
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
IR Report
Ferromanganese
u, Ferromanganese
Ferromanganese. .
Ferromanganese. .
IICIF-3, Particulates
IICIF-4, Particulates <
IIPW-3, LC3, Probe Wash
IIPW-4, LC4, Probe Wash
IIPW-5, LC5, Probe Wash, Ferromanganese
CL-1, Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
Coal
Q-
9-
9-
9-
Q-
CL-2
CL-3
CL-4
CL-5
CL-6
Coke LC-1
Coke LC-2 9-
Coke LC-3 9-
Coke LC-4 9
Coke LC-5 9-
Coke LC-6 9-
ISC-7, LC-7, Sorb. Cond. Venturi Scrubber 9-
IR Report, II C310, Cone. Extract, Particulates
>3 n, Ferromanganese b'-
IR Report, II GIF, Cone. Extract, Particulates >1 p,
Ferromanganese '>
IR Report, II X, Cone. Extract, XAD-2, Ferromanganese .... 9-
IR Report, II SC, Cone. Extract, Sorbent Condensate,
Ferromanganese 3-
IR Report, CL-7 Coal 9-
IR Report, Coke LC-7 9-
LRMS Report, IX-1, XAD-2 Extract, Silicomanganese 9-
•51
•52
•52
•53
53
54
54
55
55
56
57
57
59
60
50
0 w
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
^_^_^_*
9-90
9-91
9-92
9-93
9-94
9-95
9-96
9-97
9-98
9-99
9-100
9-101
9-102
9-103
9-104
9-105
9-106
9-107
9-108
9-109
9-110
9-111
9-112
9-113
9-114
9-115
9-116
9-117
9-118
9-119
9-120
9-121
9-122
9-123
9-124
9-125
9-126
9-127
9-128
9-129
IIX-1,
IIX-2,
IIX-3,
IIX-4,
IIX-5,
IIX-6.
XAD-2 Extract,
XAO-2 Extract,
XAD-2 Extract,
XAD-2 Extract,
Page
IX-2, XAD-2 Extract, Silicomanganese 9-70
IX-3, XAD-2 Extract, Silicomanganese 9-71
IX-6, XAD-2 Extract, Silicomanganese 9-72
IX-7, XAD-2 Extract, Silicomanganese 9-73
Monsanto Ferroalloy I-SC-1 9-74
Monsanto Ferroalloy I-SC-3 9-75
ISC-6, Sorbent Condensate, Silicomanganese . . . 9-76
XAD-2 Extract, Ferromanganese 9-77
Ferromanganese 9-78
Ferromanganese 9-79
Ferromanganese 9-80
Ferromanganese 9-81
XAD-2 Extract, Ferromanganese 9-82
IIX-7, XAD-2 Extract, Ferromanganese 9-83
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-CIF-1 9-84
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-CIF-2 9-85
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-CIF-3 9-86
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-CIF-4 9-87
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-CIF-5 9-88
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-CIF-6 9-89
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-CIF-7 9-90
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-PW-1 9-91
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-PW-2 9-92
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-PW-3 9-93
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-PW-4 9-94
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-PW-6 9-95
Monsanto Ferroalloy II-PW-7 9-96
Monsanto Ferroalloy, Coal CL-1 9-97
Monsanto Ferroalloy, Coal CL-3 9-98
Monsanto Ferroalloy, Coal CL-4 9-99
_..._ ...... ., Monsanto Ferroalloy, Coal CL-6 9-100
LRMS Report, Ferroalloy CK-1 9-101
Total Mass of Emitted Participates 9-102
Total Organics (mg/m3) For SASS Train Samples (I) Outlet
of Scrubber, Silicomanganese Process 9-103
Total Organics (mg/m3) For SASS Train Samples II Bypass,
Ferromanganese Process 9-104
Organic Extract Summary Table, IX, XAD-2, Silico-
manganese 9-105
Organic Extract Summary Table, ISC, Sorbent Condensate,
Silicomanganese 9-106
Organic Extract Summary Table, IIX, XAD-2 Extract,
Ferromanganese 9-107
Organic Extract Summary Table, IICIF, Particulates
<1 u, Ferromanganese 9-108
Organic Extract Summary Table, IIPW, Probe Wash,
Ferromanganese 9-109
LRMS Report,
LRMS Report,
LRMS Report,
LRMS Report,
LRMS Report,
LRMS Report,
LRMS Report,
LRMS Report,
LRMS Report,
LRMS Report.
LRMS Report.
LRMS Report,
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
LRMS Report
xix
-------
TABLES (continued)
Number
9-130 Organic Extract Summary Table, Coal (CL). . . . 9-110
1-131 Organic Extract Summary Table, Coke (CK) 9-111
Level 2
18 GC/MS Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) Analysis 9-113
19 GC/MA Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) Analysis 9-114
Additional Data
8 Total Extractable Organics 9-116
20 Total Polycyclic Organic Matter Data Comparison 9-117
37 Summary of Organic Analysis Results: Major Components. . . . 9-118
36 Summary of Particulate Emission Data 9-119
38 Summary of Process and Effluent Parameters 9-120
39 Comparison of AAS and SSMA Data for Arsenic and Antimony
Selected Samples 9-121
xx
-------
INTRODUCTION
This document is an accumulation of all available environmental assessment
data published from February 1978 through March 1979.
This document is the second comprehensive compilation of data from the
IERL Phased Environmental Assessment Program. The first data compilation was
published in October 1978 as EPA-600/2-78-211, Compilation of Level 1 Environ-
mental Assessment Data. As in the first data compilation, the primary purpose
of this compilation is to permit those involved in environmental assessment
programs to evaluate the quality and quantity of data generated by the phased
approach. It is felt that critical reviews of these data may lead to improve-
ments in procedures, data formatting, data storage, and data interpretation.
Although conclusions related to specific sources or source types may have been
abstracted from the references to provide background information, the focus of
this presentation is on data resulting from the Level 1 sampling and analytical
methods. The interested reader should consult the referenced documents for
more details and conclusions concerning pollutant sources, control techniques,
etc.
The phased environmental assessment program, developed by the Industrial
Environmental Research Laboratory (IERL) of the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) at Research Triangle Park (RTP), North Carolina, is divided into
three levels. Level 1 is the survey step to determine which samples from an
environmental assessment might be hazardous or toxic. Level 1 also serves to
establish the priority of samples and rank samples for further testing. When
the Level 1 sampling and analysis scheme shows the possible presence of hazards,
a Level 2 scheme is initiated to specifically identify and quantify suspected
hazardous materials. If Level 2 reveals pollutants capable of environmental
detriment, then a Level 3 scheme is begun to evaluate control technologies and
to assess long-term effects.
Fourteen studies have been identified that contain phased environmental
assessment data; these studies are organized alphabetically by source types in
xxi
-------
this compilation. It should be noted that each study included in this compil
tion will be identified as final draft, preliminary draft, etc., based on the
completeness of the study summarized; therefore, absence of data does not
necessarily indicate analysis was not performed but that the study was possib
not complete when it became necessary to compile the data. In each study, .
mention is made of methods used if they differ from the methodology specified
in the IERL-RTP Procedures Manual; Level 1 Environmental Assessment (Second
Edition), EPA-600/7-78-201.
Within each study, information is organized in the following manner:
I. Summary of the study
II. Level 1 data
A. Inorganic analysis data
1. Spark source mass spectroscopy (SSMS)
2. Atomic absorption (AA) wet chemical methods—Hg, As, Sb
3. Gas chromatography for inorganic gases
4. Chemiluminescence for NOX
5. Anion analysis
6. Aqueous analyses for pH, acidity, alkalinity, BCD, COD,
DO, conductivity, dissolved and suspended solids, and
other selected physical parameters
B. Organic analysis data
1. Gas chromatography for gases, b.p. <100° C (Ci-C7)
2. Gas chromatography for gases, b.p. >100° C (Cj-Ci?)
3. LC fractionation
4. IR
5. Low resolution mass spectrometry (LRMS)
III. Level 2 data
IV. Additional data
Data in categories III and IV are photocopied from the referenced docu-
ments. Level 1 data are presented in standard format.
xx 11
-------
STUDY NUMBER 8
-------
STUDY NUMBER 8
DATA
SOURCE:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
OF COKE BY-PRODUCT RECOVERY
PLANTS
DATA
STATUS:
EPA-600/2-79-016, January 1979
AUTHORS:
CONTRACTOR:
D. W. VanOsdell, D. Marsland, B. H. Carpenter,
C. Sparacino, and R. Jablin
Research Triangle Institute
P.O. Box 12194
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
Contract No. 68-02-2630
PROJECT
OFFICER:
Robert V. Hendriks
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
8-1
-------
The purpose of this study was to screen the solid, liquid, and gaseou
discharges from coke byproduct recovery plants for their environmental eft
Coke byproduct recovery plants separate and concentrate the volatile compoi
produced when coal is heated to form coke; these compounds include coal tat
ammonia, light oil (benzene, toluene, xylene, and other organics), coke~ov«
gas, and many other organic and inorganic components.
The study was performed in three phases. First, a very thorough evalu
tion was performed of information available from the literature, from other
governmental testing, and from other studies. Approximately 60 pages of th
report are devoted to detailed descriptions of the various coke byproduct
recovery technologies, the accompanying pollution controls, and results of
earlier analyses of effluents and emissions.
The Level 1 protocol was performed at the Fairfield Works, U.S. Steel
Corporation, coke byproduct recovery plant. Figure 8-1 (from the final repc
is a flow diagram of this plant showing the major process streams. Table 8-
(from the document) shows the samples taken for analysis at this plant and t
analyses performed on these samples.
This Level I environmental assessment focuses on organic vapor emission!
because this was the area where the least amount of information was available
In addition to the specified Level 1 procedures, the following were performec
NaQH bubbler samplers-for cyanide in gases by a colorimetric/AgN03 procedure;
evacuated stainless steel canister samplers for benzene and. benzene derivativ
by GC-FID; and GC/MS on the SASS solvent concentrate for specific PNAs.
Based on the Level 1 and other sampling and analyses at the Fairfield
plant, estimated pollutant emission rates were calculated for six major pro-
cesses: tar processing, ammonia processing, dephenolization, final cooler/
naphthalene handling, light oil recovery, and wastewater processing. The
SAM/1A model was used to estimate the relative hazard of various processes;
the biological treatment plant (wastewater) effluent was the most significant
environmental hazard when emission rates were considered. Other major sources
were the cooling tower for the contact final cooler and the biological treat-
ment sludge.
8-2
-------
A summary of the study's conclusions, taken from the final report, follows:
This study is a limited-scope first look at the by-product plant from
the environmental point of view [underline added]. As such, it points to
a need for control of light aromatics and PNA's. Control may be most
likely achieved throught techniques that essentially eliminate the
sources: venting tanks back to the gas mains; blanketing with coke oven
gas. The potential for application of venting and coke oven gas blanket-
ing should be determined by further study. Alternative technologies for
dephenolization, cyanide handling, and desulfurization should be further
studied with respect to their relative environmental impacts. Solid
wastes present hazards in disposal that require further investigation.
Wastewater treatment capabilities and effects need further delineation.
Economic models of the annualized costs of alternative processes should
be further developed to permit delineation of most cost effective tech-
nologies.
8-3
-------
MCVCUO COOUNO WATCH
00
OCMENIOLIZCO CQO
FLUSMMM LMUON
FLUSMM0
LMUOH
OtCANTI*
PRIMAHV
COOLCH
OCCAMTWI
CAUSTIC
100IUH
PMCNOLATC
NtMOVALl
•TCAM
\ ,
AK
UON
CANTtR
„ 1 .... ...' J -"in
IOCMVMU
V .
L,
ICC
"i
ILL
T
1 1
• ii1
TON)
4
•ALT
LIONT OIL
PLANT
UAN WASH
OIL
»>
WASTC WATCH
CHUM LIOMT
OIL
•ASTC AMMONIA LIMC
LIOUOM SLUOOI
COAL
TAN
M/OAY
CAMON tOLIDt
WATCH
CAMtOM MOXIOC
NMMtOWN tULftOt
AMMONIA NITHOMN
CrANICC
CNLOHIOC
•A*C*; Ht, CO.CM,.N,0,,MC
CAMWN OltULFHW
LIOHT CHLI
TAH ACIP*
TAN Mfft
rotrc»eLic»
OTHCH
TOTALS
TCMPtNATUNC *C
PNrS*UN(. ktri
COAL
lOpOCP
»00
0,900
V
com
T3TO
rjro
V
NAW
a A*
100
••
tt
ii
4
two
t
•0
t
1
(•40
«0
II
V
MM
LIQUM
too
1
1
«
1
1
1
tio
K>
V
TAN
•
•
IO
10
14 O
1*0
10
w
STIt*
DO
1
1
•
1
110
M
II
«MTC
LMUEM
IO4O
THACC
1
MACI
:«i i
I04O
100
V
ITCAM
s«o
ISO
110
jr
V
(ALT
to
IO..H
TS
V
CO*
MO
»0
10
•
1*00
I
•0
t
1
IttO
48
IDS
V
co«
MO
• O
JO
I
1900
s
•0
t
I««O
JO
IO4
V
co«
IJO
•»
»0
J
ISOO
»
IT»0
10
102
V
CftUPC
LO
t
ts
f
•O
v
CO*
1*0
• 0
t
IKOO
9
irto
50
I.O
• *ASI*: THt SCALE FACTOH TO DUNLOP AND McMICHACL (Ml IS SAO
k. NOUNOEO
Figure 8-1.
-------
TABLE 8-1. COKE BY-PRODUCT RECOVERY PLANTS POLLUTANT SOURCES
Operation
Emissions Source
Tar Processing
tar decanter
prim, cooler condensate
tank
tar dewatering and
storage
tar topping (distillation)
tar distillation-product
tar distillation pitch
Ammonia Processing
excess liquor tank
excess ammonia liquor
phenol extraction
ammonia stills
fixed still
sulfate crystal lizer-
dryer
sulfuric acid storage
tank
ammonium sulfate
storage
Dephenolization
Pollutants to:
Ai r Water
(x),f,P,LA,H2S
(x),f,NO,LA,H2S
(x),f,P,LA
(y),f (z), bar
(x),f,PI,LA cond.
(2), f
(x),P,LA
(2),f
(z),vent
(z),f
(2),f
(z),f
(y),f if (z)
vented to
gas main
Land
(y), sludge
(2), tar
product
(y), pitch
product
( z ), sludge
(y), sludge
Final Cooler, Naphthalene
Handling
cooling tower, for con-
tact cooler
hot and cold wells
naphthalene separator
(froth floatation)
naphthalene dryer
Light Oil Recovery
wastewater
wash oil sludge
(x),P,HCN,LA
(x),f,PI,LA
(y), vent
(x).P.LA
(z),water
decanted
(y)
(y)
8-5
-------
TABLE 8-1 (continued)
Operation
Emissions Source
Pollutants to:
Water
Land
wash-oil storage
wash-oil decanters
light-oil storage
light-oil condenser
vent
Desulfurization
by absorption
by wet oxidation
Cyanide Handling
catalytic destruction
waterwork
regenerate or blown air
ammonium polysulfide
Coke Oven Gas, After Tar
Removal
Biological Treatment Plant
Feed
ef f .1 uent
sludge
(z),f
*.A«*mmtA b«fa*» 1C
2. roitiMcfwlMkiwMiiM^ for LC. actual n|
1 Oaai^y »c0»crai*raiB 1C cotoiM,actint «|
& SvpityvaittM for bath mM)to
8-IB
-------
TABLE 8-25.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Froth Flotation Separator, XAD-2 Resin
TotilSwnpIt1
TikinforLC2
Recovered3
TCO
mi
18,538
52.7
GRAV
mi
40
1.6
TCO + GRAV
Totaling
18,578
54.3
Concentration
ing/ (m3. L, or kg}5
6,213.4
Fraction
t
2
3
4
S
6
7
Sum
TCO in mj
:oundin
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rected
0.0
48.0
0,8
0.1
4.8
0.0
n.n
53.7
Total4
0
12,000
200
25
1,200
Q
0
13,425
GRAV in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rected
Total4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TCO +
GRAV
Totaling
0
12,000
200
25
1,200
0
0
13,425
Concentration
mg/
(m3L.orkg)5
0
4,013;:
67
8
401
0
0
4,489
1. Quantity in entire sample, determined before 1C
2. Portion of whole sample used for LC, actual mg
1 Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
5. Supply values for both sample size and concentration
8-19
-------
TABLE 8-26.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Froth Flotation Separator, Canister Rinse
TctalSmpte1
TihraferLC*
Rttmorad3
TCO
«•
360
36.1
6RAV
m|
493
49.4
TCO+GRAV
Total m*
853
85.5
Conccntnt)
mi/ <«3.ltl
5,686.
-
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sam
TCO ami
Forarfw
FnctiM
0IMK
Cw-
nctri
QrO
1.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.7
0,0
1.9
Tot*!4
0.0
2.0
0.4
0.0
0.0
1.4
0.0
3.8
GRAVmmi
Fwwdia
FnetiM
BlMfa
Cat-
racttd
-LL5.
7.4
7.2
2.4
1.8
11.4
2.6
44.3
Tottl4
23.4
15.1
14.7
4.9
3.7
23.2
5.3
90.3
TCO +
6RAV
Totrimi
23.4
17.1
15.1
4.9
3.7
24.6
5.3
94.1
Conctntm
mg/
(m3.L,or||
156.0
114.0 •
100.7
32.7
24.7
164.0
35.3
627.4
1. Quantity in tntira nmpte, dtttrmmtrf b
-------
TABLE 8-27.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Final Cooler Cooling Tower, XAD-2 Resin
Tori Sample1
TakmforLC2
Recovered3
TCO
mi
6,066
47
GRAY
mt
60
9.4
TCO i- GRAV
Totaling
60,126
56.4
Concentration
mg/ (m3.L.orkg)5
1,817.8
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sum
TCO in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
reeled
0.0
34.0
0.7
1.1
0.9
6.2
0.0
42.9
Total4
0.0
1,020
21
33
27
186
0.0
L,287
GRAV in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
,, , ..•- j
lacieo
-0,?
0.0
-0.1
-0.1
-0.1
0.0
-0.1
Total4
o.n
0.0
0.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TCO +
GRAV
Total mg
o.n
1,020
21
33
27
186
0.0
1,287
Concentration
mg/
(m3.L,orkg)5
0.0
302.9
6.2
9.8
8.0
55.2
0.0
381.9
1. Quantity in entire simple, determined before LC
2. Portion of whole sample used for LC, actual mg
1 Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
5. Supply values for both sample size and concentration
8-21
-------
TABLE 8-28.
LC FRACTIONATION
Final cooler cooling tower vapor, canister rinse
Total Samotob
TalmfarLC'
Racavarad
TCO
«t
138
0.0
M.
1
2
3
4
S
8
7
TCO*
GRAV
«t
16.0
11.0
TCO •*• GRAV
totaling
154.0
11.0
Concentration*
m§/ (m3, L, or kg)
5.6
0.40
GRAV*
mff
(TCO + GRAV <15
TCO •*• GRAV
totaling
mg, no LC)
Concentration3 ;
mg/ (m3, L, or kg)
i
6n sampta, totuaimt Mm LC.
* Portion of whoit sample used for LC, actati 019.
e QtMntity ntntnd from LC coiamn, actnl 019.
d Total mg comniitrt back to total samplt.
' Values suppriad for both sampla siza ind cancaotratHML
f Not
8-22
-------
TABLE 8-29.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Final cooler coolfng tower, hot well, pH 2
Total Simple1
Taken for LC2
Rfcsawred3
TCO
mg
2,160
73.2
GRAV
m§
192
18.1
TCO + GRAV
Total mg
2,352
91,3
Concentration
mg/ (m3, L. or kg)5
2,940
Fraction
t
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sum
TCO in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rected
0.0
30.0
0.0
4.2
1.1
28.7
0.0
64.0
Total4
0.0
600.0
0.0
84.0
22.0
574.0
0.0
1280.0
GRAV in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rected
1.25
0.8
0.2
0.6
0.0
3.2
0.6
6.65
Total4
25.0
16.0
4.0
12.0
0.0
64.0
12.0
133
TCO*
GRAV
Total mg
25.0
616.0
4.0
96.0
22.0
638.0
12.0
1413.0
Concentration
mg/
(m3.L,orkg)5
31.2
770.0
5.0
120.0
27.5
797.5
15.0
1766.2
1. Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC
2. Portion of whole sample used lor LC, actual mg
3. Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
5. Supply values for both sample size and concentration
8-23
-------
TABLE 8-30.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Final cooler cooling tower, hot well, pH 12
Total Sample1
TikanforLC2
Recovered3
TCO
mg
72Q
66, Q
GRAV
IBf
80,0
25,8
TCO + GRAV
Totaling
800
91.8
Concent ratit
m«/
-------
TABLE 8-31.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Final cooler cooling tower, cold well, pH 2
Total Sample1
Taken for LC2
Recovered^
TCO
mg
1,360
43.1
GRAV
m|
160
17.4
TCO + GRAV
Total me.
1,520
61.0
CoACffltntiofl
mg/ 5
1,900
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sum
TCO in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rected
0.0
10.2
0.0
1.2
3.4
28.1
0.0
42.9
Total4
0,0
204.0
0.0
24.0
68.0
562.0
0.0
858.0
GRAV in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rectod
0.75
0.0
0.4
0.4
0.6
6.2
0.2
8.55
Total4
15.0
0.0
8.0
8.0
12.0
124.0
4,0
171.0
TCO*
GRAV
Totaling
15.0
204.0
8.0
32.0
80.0
686.0
4.0
1,029.0
Concentration
mg/
(m3,L.ork|)5
18.8
255,0
10.0
40,0
100.0
857.5
5.0
1,286.3
1. Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC
2. Portion of whole sample used for LC, actual mg
3. Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
5. Supply vetoes for both sample size and concentration
8-25
-------
TABLE 8-32.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Final cooler cooling tower, cold well, pH 12
TttoiSMpk1
TthMforLC2
ffUfiOMfW^
TCO
•I
480
71.2
6RAV
mf
160
5.8
TCO + 6RAV
Traimf
640
77.0
CmcHtratMt
nil («3.L.«H
800
Fraction
1
2
3
4
S
I
7
Sum ,
TCO HI «|
FMfldM
FnctiM
Bhwk
Cm-
racttd
0.0
0.1
0.0
1.5
0.9
47.8
0.0
50.3
Tttal4
0.0
0.5
0.0
7.5
4.5
239.0
0.0
251.5
GRAVtami
Fotmdm
FrKtiM
llMk
C*f
IWMd
0.0
0.0_
0.2
0.6
0.2
5.0
0.0
6.0
Tan!4
0.0
0.0
1.0
3.0
1.0
25.0
0.0
30.0
TCO +
GRAV
Tottlm«
0.0
0.5
1.0
10.5
5.5
264.0
0.0
281.5
CoKMtntii
m*
-------
TABLE 8-33.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank, XAD-2 Resin
Tottl Sample1
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
TCO
mi
6,620
60.9
GRAV
ing
100
25.4
TCO + GRAV
Tottlmf
6,720
86.3
Concentration
me/ (m3 L. or k«)5
2,030
Fraction
1
2
3
4
S
6
7
Sum
TCO in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rected
1.8
42.0
3,5
8.0
4.0
45.0
0.0
53.0
Total4
180
4,200
350
80
40
450
0.0
5,300
GRAV in mj
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rected
0.0
0.2
n.o
0.2
0.4
0.0
0.3
1.1
Total4
0.0
20.0
n.n
20.0
40.0
0.0
60.0
140.0
TCO +
GRAV
Totaling
180
4,220
350
100
80
450
60
5,440
Concantntion
mg/
(m3.L.ork9)5
54
1.275
106
30
24
136
18
1,643
1. Quantity m entire sample, determined before LC
2. Portion of whole sample used for LC, actual mg
3. Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg
4. Totaling computed back to totai sample
5. Supply values for both sample size and concentration
8-27
-------
TABLE 8-34.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Vapor Above Tar Storage Tank, Canister Rinse
TrtaiSM**1
TtkmfwLC2
HMovprad*^
TCO
**
1,545
97.1
6RAV
mi
109 (spill)
6.8.
TCO + &RAV
Tttttmt
1,654
103.9
CMCtfltratwt
n»V (»3,l,or|
11 ,027
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sun
TCO rnrnt
FMMlHI
Fraction
Blank
COT-
IMtM
2.0
30.0
?7 n
0.2
0.0
2.0
0.0
71.6
T«rf*
24.2
364
A£>3
2.42
0.0
24.2
0.0
868
GRAVteffli
FoitMlm
FractiM
«Mk
Car-
racM
0.75
2.6
n.^
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.15
Totf4
9. 1C
31.5
7_?£
2r4?
0.0
0.0
0.0
50,3
TCO*
6RAV
Total m«
33.3
396
Afin
4.84
0.0
24.2
0.0
918
ConcMitratit
^
(m3,L, ofl^
222
2,640 ,
^3nfi7
32.^
o ;
161
O.C
6,123
1. QoMtity w wtift amplt, drttrraiMrf ktfort LC
2. PmtiwiofwfcekamBkuBdfof LC.§ctoalin8
4. Totrf m| camBtrtHl bMk to tvtti amito
5. S«0piy »ate«sfor jbotb.iMiote sin and nacamratiM
8-28
-------
TABLE 8-35.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Tar Decanter Vapor, XAD-2 Resin
Total Sample1
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
TCO
mg
31,520
44.9
GRAV
mg
20,080
29.1
TCO + GRAV
Totslmfl
33 ,600
74.0
Concentration .
ing/ {m3, L. or kg)5
10,874
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sum
TCO in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rected
0.0
14.7
14 Q
0,8
0.1
0.8
0,0
31.3
Total4
0.0
11,025
n 171;
600
75
600
0.0
23,475
GRAV in mg
Found in
Fraction'
Blank
Cor-
rected
0.25
1.2
n n
0.0
0.0
0.6
-0,?
205
Total4
188
900
0 0
0,0'
0.0
450
0,0
1,538
TCO +
GRAV
Total mg
188
11 ,925
11J71:
600
75
1,050
0.0
25,013
Concentration
mg/
(m3,Lforkg)5
61
3,859
1,617
194
24
340
0
8,095
1. Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC
2. Portion of whole sample used for LC, actual mg
1 Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
5. Supply values for both sample size and concentration
8-29
-------
TABLE 8-36.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Tar Decanter,Vapor, Canister Rinse
Total Sampta1
Taken for LC2
Roeowrtd3
TCO
•1
8,190
85.5
GRAY
mi
1,760
18.4
TCO + GRAV
TMriMj
9,950
103.9
, Concantratioi
mi/ (in3, L. erj
47,381
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
S
7
Sum
TCO to MI
FowNlH
FnedM
M
C«r-
fMtM
0.0
88.3
M
0.0
0.0
S.1
0.0
94.4
Tom4
0.0
5,520
62.-
O.C
o.c
319*
O.C
5,900
GRAVMmf
Found m
FnetiM
BlMk
C»f-
rectM
.
Tatrt4
62.5
2,390
25,0
12.5
37.5
12.5
25.0
2.56E
TCO +
6RAV
Total nn
62.5
7,910
87.3
12.5
37.5
331.5
25.0
8,466
Concentratr
may
(mJfL,orh(
298,
37,667^
416
59
178
1.578
119
40,315
1. Quantity in mtin aniflh, tfattrmiMd bafM LC
2. Portim »f whole tampfe wad for LCraetoai mi
1 Quairtityrecawtdfn»mLCeo4Biiw,»«tt8ltii|
4. Total nt| campntad back to totaJ amnla
5. Supply vahias fw kcth vmipla tin awi caawntiatiM
8-30
-------
TABLE 8-37.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate Extract pH 2
Total Sample1
Taken for LC2
Recovered3
TCO
m|
1,545
46.2
GRAV
n»i
138
25.3
TCO + QRAV
Totaling
1,683
71.5
Concentration
mi/ (m3.L,orkg)5
11,220
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sum
TCO in m|
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
nct*d
0.0
5.4
3.7
1-9
2.1
29.8
0.0
42.9
Total4
0.0
108
74
38
42
596
0.0
858
6RAV in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rected
0.25
3.0
4.2
0.2
0.4
4.8
0.1
L2.9
Total4
5.0
60
84
8.0
16
192
0.0
365
TCO +
GRAV
Total mg
5.0
168
158
46
58
788
0.0
1,223
Concentration
mo/
(m3.L.ork|)5
33.3
1,1-20
1,053
307
387
5,253
0.0
8,153
1. Quantity in entire ample, determined before LC
2. Portion of whole sample used for LC, actual mg
3. Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
5. Supply values for both sample size and concentration
8-31
-------
TABLE 8-38.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Tar Decanter Vapor, Condensate Extract pH
TttoiSMtpfe1
TUmftolC*
RNOMCM^
TOO
Ml
345
67.6
etuv
•Hi
138
5.2
TCOtQRAV
Trtrfm,
483
72.8
-i
C*actntratM<
mi/
-------
TABLE 8-39.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank, XAD-2 Resin
Total Simple1
Taken forLC2
Recovered^
TCO
mi
26,730
57.6
GRAV
mg
3,360
11.5
TCO t- GRAV
Totaling
30,090
69.1
Concentration
ing/ (m3.L.orkg)s
9,345
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6 .
7
Sum
TCO in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
ractcd
0.3
14.9
17.7
0.0
0.2
6.0
0.0
39.1
Total4
150.0
7,450.0
8,850.0
0.0
100.0
3,000.0
0.0
19,550-
GRAV in mg
Found in
Fraction
)
Blank
Cor-
rected
0.0
0.0
-0.2
-0.2
-0.1
0.0
-0.1
0.0
Total4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
TCO +
GRAV
Totaling
150
,450
,850
0
100
5,000
0
19,550
ConcMtration
mg/
(m3.L,ork|)5
46.6
2,317.7
2,748.4
0.0
31.0
931.7
0.0
6,075.4
1. Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC
2. Portion of whole sample used for LC, actual mg
1 Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg
4. Total mg computed back to total sample
5. Supply values for both sample size and concentration
8-33
-------
TABLE 8-40.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Vapor Above Chemical Oil Tank, Canister Rinse
Total Samok1
TakM-teLC2
fiMMO^OMttoi*)
ffflvvfVfW^
TOO
*•
2,480
19.6
GRAV
mi
8,960
70.8
TCO + 6RAV
To* mi
11,440
90.4
CoMtntntj
•»•/ <«3.M
57,200
FractwB
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
SMI
TCOMMff
Fmndia
FnctioH
-
BlMfc
Cor-
nctw
15.3
65.6
17.4
0.0
0.0
4.2
0.0
102.5
Totri4
3,740
16,000
4,260
0
0
1,030
0
25,030
6RAV«mf
Fomdte
FnctiM
Itek
Cor-
ncttd
0.5
27.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
O.Q
27.5
Tom*
122
5,610
0
734
0
0
0
7,466
TCO +
GRAV
Total nig
3,862
22,610
4,260
734
0
1,030
0
32,496
Conctntn
m*
(m3.L. or
19,3]
113,0!
21, 31
3,5;
5,15
162,48
1. QoMtity la Mtm nnpto, dttefimMd before LC
2. PortmofwkoltwiiplciuMlforLC.wtutlmg
1 Quantity ncovtnd from LC colwnn, KtMl m«
4^ Total mfl camvutBd b«* to total trnid*
8-34
-------
TABLE 8-41.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Upwind Ambient, XAD-2 Resin
Total Sample1
Taken for LC2
RtCOVBfM
TCO
mg
100
24
GRAV
m%
40
11.5
TCO + GRAV
Total mg
140
35.5
Concentration
mil (m*. L,orkg)5
140
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sum
TCO in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rected
1.0
12.4
3.6
0.0
0,9
?,1
0.0
20 0
Total4
2.0
24.8
7.2
0.0
1.8
4.2
0.0
/|Q Q
GRAV in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
roctra
0.0
1.6
0.8
0.0
0.0
? n
2.6
7 n
Total4
0.0
3.2
1.6
C.O
0.0
4 n
5.2
14.0
TCO +
GRAV
Totaling
2.0
28.0
8.8
0.0
1.8
R.7
5.2
54.0
Concentration
mg/
(m3.L.orkg)5
2.0
28.0
8.8
0.0
1.8
ft. 7
5.2
54.0
1. Quantity in entire ample, determined before LC
2. Portion of vyhote simple used for LC, actual mg
3. Quantity retownd from LC column, actual mg
4. Total mg computed back to total sampte
5. Supply values for both sample size and concentration
8-35
-------
TABLE 8-42.
LC FRACTIONATION
SAMPLE: Upwind ambient, canister rinse
Timl SainnhJ*
Taken for LC*
Recovered
fneto*
1
2
3
4
8
8
7
TCO
mi
t
V
(data. not ,
available)
TCO*
mg
6RAV
mg
6.7
GRAV*
mg
(TCO + GRAV <1
TCO f GRAV
tO til Rlf
available-- — )
TCO + SRAV
totii mg
5 mg, No LC)
Concentration3
ntg/ (m3. L. or kg)*
0.24
Concmtration'
mg/ (m3, L, or kg)
*Standard conditions of 20° C and 760 mmHg.
" Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC.
b Portion of whole sample used for LC, actoal mg.
c Quantity recovered from LC commn, actual mg.
d Total mg computed back to total sample.
1 Values supplied for both sample ska and concentration.
f Not detectable,
8-36
-------
TABLE 8-43.
LC FRACTIONATION
SAMPiE: Downwind ambient, XAD-2 resin
Total Samptab
Taken for LCe
Recovered11
TCO
"»9
0
3.0
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TCO"
mg
(TCO + GRAV
GRAV
mg
60.0
33.5
TCO + GRAV
totaling
60.0
36.15
Concentration*
mg/ (m3 L.orkg)*
2.2
1.3
GRAV8
mg
<15 mg, No LC)
TCO + GRAV
totaling
Concentration*
mg/ (m3, L, or kg)
*Standard conditions of 20° C and 760 mmHg.
a Quantity in entire sample, determined before L C.
Portion of whole ample used for LC, actual mg.
0 Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg.
Total mg computed back to total sample.
9 Values supplied for both sample size and concentration.
f
Not detectable.
8-37
-------
TABLE 8-44.
UC FRACTIONATION
SAMPLE- Downwind ambient, canister rinse
Total Sanpfe*
TakMfarLC*
_________ 4
ice
•§
225.0
Fraction
1
2
3
--- « •;• • '
- s -
- -• • -• •• "
. . i
TCO*
m|
(TCO > GRAV
8RAV
**
4.0
.8.2
TCO + &RAV
totrimf
229.0
CoacMtration3
mf/ (m^.L,of^
8.3
0.30
-'
QRAV*
nq
<15 mg, No;LC)
TCO + 6RAV
totiintt
Canctntntfofl3
mj/ {m3, L, or kg)
*Standard conditions of 20° C and 760 nroHg.
* Quantity in ntira simyte, dttwrmotd tefon LC.
* Porto* «f wfeolt snipi* itiwi for LC, Ktttai mg.
6 Oimttty neo«
-------
TABLE 8-45.
ORGANIC ANALYSIS
Biological Treatment Plant Sludge, pH 7 Extract
Total Sample*
Taken for LC2
Recovered^
TCO
mg
135
1.5
GRAV
mg
45
28
TCO + GRAV
Total mg
180
29.5
Concentration
mg/ (m3.L,orkg)5
400
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Sum
TCO in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
rected
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Total4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
GRAV in mg
Found in
Fraction
Blank
Cor-
±i«.ji*«-il
rvClml
8.0
1.8
2.2
0.8
.0.2
10.4
1.2
24.6
Total4
16.0
3.6
4.4
1.6
0,4
20.8
2.4
49.2
TCO +
GRAV
Total mg
16.0
3.6
4.4
1.6
0^4
20.8
2.4
49.2
Concentration
mg/
-------
TABLE 8-46.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: JSA-P. ammonia..1 iquor. .pH, 2 extract: preliminary IR
Wwt Number
(cm'1)
3590, 3470
3600-3000
3040, 3000
Inttnoty
w
w( broad)
w
2955, 2938, i .
2850
Assignment/Comments
free and dimeric OH stretch of phenols
alcohol or phenolic OH stretch (polymeric)
aromatic CH stretch
s 1 aliphatic CH stretch
1660-1650 m
1455, 1330
m,w
845-800 | w
1330
1
w
!
diary! ketones, carboxylate ion, or aromatic <
highly conj. carboxylic acid
alkyl CH bend
sub. aromatic CH bend
unassigned
i 1 )
;
i
•• ~t
i
!
! !
i • ,
i
I .
! 1 1 . .
! j
j '
OTHER REMARKS:
Spectrum indicates that sample is'predominantly alkylated phenols or
alkylated derivates of highly unsaturated or aromatic acids.
8-40
-------
SAMPU:
TABLE 8-47.
!R REPORT
8A-C, ammonia liquor, pH 2 extract: concentrate IR
Wavi Number
(era'1}
i 3418
3055
2959, 2925,
2856
1650
1602
Intensity Assignment/Comments
w alcoholic or phenolic OH
m aromatic C-H
s aliphatic C-H
m } B-diketone, diary! ketone
m aromatic
i 1459 J s aromatic, methyl, methyl ene
I 1376 j m aromatic, methyl, methyl ene
814
m aromatic, methyl , methyl ene
746 s aromatic, C-C1 , aliphatic
1240 w unassigned
...
i
I •'..'•
i
I I
I
1 !
1
~
! ; . .•
OTHER REMARKS:
2363 and 2342 due to Co2.
Sample appears to contain predominantly alkylated phenols,
8-41
-------
TABLE 8-48.
IR REPORT
SAMPt.fi: 8A-LC1. ammonia 11 guor. pH 2 extract: LC cut
IR
Wm Nwnfeir
(on'1}
2959, 2932,
Inttmtty
2856 ! s
1465, 1376
m
. 1
725
w
AnifiHMRt/Comfflffflts
aliphatic C-H
aliphatic CH bend
unassianed
OTHER REMARKS:
Probable saturated hydrocarbon, LRMS indicative of some PNAs as well as
saturated chains.
8-42
-------
TABLE 8-49.
IR REPORT
JuiPLEf 8A-LC2, ammonia liquor, pH 2 extract: LC cut #2
Wave Number
(cm'1)
3055
IR
Intensity ; Assignment/Comments
s aromatic C-H, -CH7-halogen
Z959, 2925^ ;
2870
1931
1808
1733
1602
1458
1376
1315
1246
1911
s aliphatic C-H
w aromatic
w aromatic
w aromatic
m aromatic
s aliphatic CH bend
m methyl CH bend
m aromati c
m aromatic
m aromatic
1081, 1033, !
958
833, 732
m aromati c
s aromatic, C-C1 , aliphatic
! •
i
1
I
!
i
i
;
i
THER REMARKS:
Probable mono-substituted alkyl aromatic.
8-43
-------
TABLE 8-50.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE 8A-LC3, ammonia liquor, pH 2 extract: LC cut #3 IR
Wm Number
(cm'1)
i
Intensity
3055 s
Assignment/Comments
aromatic C-H, -CH?-halogen
2925 w aliphatic C-H
1650
1602
w unsaturated aromatic
m
1452. s
1191 ! m
883 i m
842 -
815 .
. . a .
s
| 773 s
746 s
1924, 1801
w
i t
1
i .
i
i
i
i . ,
'
. • : • .
.
aromatic
aromatic
aromatic
aromati c
: .aromatic
aromatic
aromatic
aromatic
unas signed
t
i
!
OTHER REMARKS:
PNA hydrocarbons; confirmed by LRMS
8-44
-------
TABLE 8-51.
1R REPORT
8A-LC4. ammonia liquor, pH 2 extract: 1C cut #4 IR
Wave Number
(cm )
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
425
m
alcoholic or phenolic OH
055
w
aromatic C-H
650
w
B-diketone unsaturated C-H carboxylic acid, diaryl
ketone
[52_
528
aliphatic C-H
m
|aliphatic C-H, phenol, acid
?39
16
25
m
aliphatic C-H, phenol, acid or alcohol
JCH.,, C-C1, aromatic
, C-C1, aromatic
IER REMARKS:
' 2390, 2370, due to
8-45
-------
TABLE 8-52.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 8A-LC5, ammonia liquor. pH 2 extract: LC cut #5 IR
Wm Number
.1 inttnsrty >
(em ')
Astignnwnt/Comnwnts
3384 m OH
3055 . m aromatic C-H
2932
2856
s aliphatic C-H
m
1719 w
1602 m
aliphatic C-H
ketone, ester
aromatic
1458 s aromatic
1376 m
1273 m
821 m
aromatic
CH,-
746 s phenyl, C-C1 , aliphatic
i
2226, 1917 w junassigned
i
1. , ,.-
i
.
.
.. ...... .-.-. -p -.- - • ......
i
i
!
i . 1
,
i
OTMER REMARKS:
This sample possessed, less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria fd
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier
Transform IR techniques. , ,
Substituted phenol probable. Bands at 2363 cm"1 and 2239 cm due to C02-
8-46
-------
TABLE 8-53.
!R REPORT
PIE: 8A-LC6. ammonia liquor, pH 2 extract: 1C cut #6 IR
Wave Number
1
(cm'1)
,
Intensity
. .
Assignment/Comments
>80
aromatic C-H
199
aromatic C-H
255_
325
363
550_
>96
159
aromatic C-H
aliphatic C-H
m
aliphatic C-H
B-diketone, carboxylate, diary! ketone
substituted phenyl
substituted phenyl
ester, ether
55
m
aromatic C-H
C-C1 , aromatic C-H, aliphatic
126
w
| unassigned
:R REMARKS:
LRMS supports aromatic nature of compounds responsible for this spectrum. Probably
terocyclic amines. wauij
8-47
-------
TABLE 8-54.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE-. 8A-LC7. ammonia liauor. oH 2 extract: 1,0 cut #7 IR
Wtvt Number
'1}
intensity
2970 s aliphatic C-H
2925
2875
1740
s
aliphatic C-H
m aliphatic C-H
Assignment/Comments
(stretchinq)
(stretching)
(stretching)
s ester or aliphatic ketone
1431 ^ m | aliphatic C-H
1376 m aliphatic C-H
1239 s
i 1123
m
1082 m
(bending)
(bending)
ester C-0
ester C-0
ester C-0
1027 m ester C-0
739
698
m
m
616 m
1 - • -
C-C1, aromatic
C-C1, aromatic
C-C1, aromatic
C-H, aliphatic
C-H, aliphatic
C-H, aliphatic
i
• . . 1
i
1
i
1
i
OTHER REMARKS:
Probable ester.
8-48
-------
TABLE 8-55.
!R REPORT
PJ.E: 8B-P, ammonia liquor, pH 12 extract: preliminary IR
Wave Number
(cm'1) j
>00-3150
190, 3020
i
Intensity ! Assignment/Comments ',
i
Broad 'unresolved band due to NH stretch of amines and
! anides
m ! aromatic or olefinic CH stretch |
120, 2918, !
I860 i m idiphatic CH stretch »
'25 ! s jester or diphatic ketone !
>50 s I amide I band
115-1590
s (broad) 1 substituted aromatic C-C or NH bend of 1° amine
170 w 1 aliphatic CH bend
!40, 1120 s ester of aromatic acid, CN stretch of amines or '
' 1
i anides, alcohol or aromatic ether
)0, 640 j m substituted aromatic CH bend '
10
w unas signed
i i
i .
| •
I
!
! i
i
!
i
R REMARKS:
Sample appears to be predominantly aliphatic amides and ketones, but only some
Jubstltuted benzene compounds.
8-49
-------
TABLE 8-56.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 8B-C, ammonia liquor, pH 12 extract: concentrate IR
Wave Number
. .1 Intensity
(cm )
3600
3500-2900
( broad )
Assignment/Com me? ts
"Free" OH of .alcohol or D-henol
OH and/or NH stretch of alcohols, amines, and
anides
i 3030, 3000 . aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
2955, 2930,
2875,2850
1725 j
1 1660
1595, 1500 !
1470, 1385
diphatic CH stretch
ester or aliphatic ketone
amide I band
aromatic C-C and ami no NH bend
aliphatic CH bend
1250-1080 CH stretch for amines and anides, C-0 stretch of
1
840-730 (broadl
810
1510, 1340,
1000, 950
i
w
-
alcohol, C-C-0 stretch of aromatic esters, or C-0-i
stretch of ethers
amine and anide NH bend
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
-1
Bands at 1610, 1605, 1595, and 1510 cm"A probably arising from NH stretching
of 1* and 2° amides and amines.
Sample predominantly aromatic and aliphatic amines and amides, but also con-
taining some alcohols aliphatic ketones, esters of aromatic acids, and/or aromatic
-or aliphatic ethers.
8-50
-------
J1PLE: 3B-LC1,
Wave Number
(cm'1)
960, 2926,
2852
462, 1377,'
1281
)37
'35
IMDLC tt-D/.
!R REPORT
ammonia liquor, pH 12 extract: LC cut #1 IR
Intensity ! Assignment/Comments
i
s al kane
m lalkane
rn alkane
w unassigned
. • • •
•
i
t
!
!
R REMARKS:
y the Level
.echniques quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
Sample consisted of saturated hydrocarbons and saturated ethers.
8-51
-------
TABLE 8-58.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 8B-LC2, ammonia liquor. pH 12 extract: 1C cut 12 IR
Wavt Number
\ (cm'1)
Intensity Assignment/Comments
i "•
' 3055 m aromatic C-H, -CHo-haloqen
2959, 2925,
2856
1452
S
aliphatic C-H
m | aromatic, aliphatic
1376 w aliphatic
833, 842, \
815, 773 m aliphatic
732
s
aliphatic, C-C1 , aliphatic
i 1938, 1726
w unas signed
i
t
i
i
i
i
•
t
t
i
i
i
i
;
i
OTHER REMARKS:
this sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Trans-
form IR techniques.
2362 and 2342 due to C0?. Probably PNA hydrocarbon. Sample contains alkylated
aromatic hydrocarbons. fc
8-52
-------
TABLE 8-59.
IR REPORT
AMPLE: 8fa-Llj, ammonia hquor, pH 12 extract: 1C cut
Wave Number
(cm'1)
3053
2926, 2853
1728
1668
1456
1238
815
749
Intensity
W
c
W
W
m
w
m
m
i
Assignment/comments
aromatic C-H, -CH?-halogen i
aliphatic C-H i
ester or aliphatic ketone !
al kene i
aromatic, methyl, methyl ene !
ester, ether |
aromatic, C-C1 • j
aromatic, C-C1 i
1377, 881,
640
w
unassigned
ITHER REMARKS:
'This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for IR
analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform IR
techniques.
2363 and 2339 due to C02. Specific PNA's identified by LRMS,
8-53
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-60.
IR REPORT
8B-LC4, ammonia liquor, pH 12 extract: 1C cut #4 IR
Wivt Number
(cm"1)
3459
3062
2973, 2918
2856
1725
inanity ! Asagnmmt/Comnwiits
m
OH/NH
m aromatic C-H,-CH9-halogen
s aliphatic C-H
m
w
1602 w
1431, 1335 s
1239 j s
i 1095 m
965 m
aliphatic C-H
ester, ketone
aromatic
aromatic, methyl
ester, ether, amine
aromatic
aromati c
746, 615 s aromatic, C-C1 , aliphatic
1198, 698
i
w unas signed
!
j
i
i
i
i
!
OTHER REMARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria
for IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier
Transform IR techniques.
Probable aromatic amine or alcohol. LRMS more consistent with amines.
8-54
-------
TABLE 8-61.
R REPORT
s- BB-LCt, ammonia houor, PH 12 extract: LC cut ^b Ik
Wave Number
(cnf1) i
600-3200
959, 2932,
2856
733
602
459, 1438
.249, 1102
46, 698
172, 855
i
j
' i
1 ntensity Assignment/Comments
w(broad) alcohol or phenolic OH
i
i i
s ! aliphatic CH stretch
m i ester or aliphatic ketone
w i aromatic C-C
m | aliphatic CH bend, aromatic !
m ester or aromatic acid, alcohol, ether
w ! substituted aromatic CH bend
i
w unassigned
i
i
!
!
!
!
ER REMARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria
pr IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier
Iransform IR techniques.
Probable alcohols and esters of aromatic acids.
8-55
-------
TABLE 8-62.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 8B-LC5, ammonia liquor. pH 12 extract: LC cut 15 IR
i Wm Number
i (cm'1)
1
i 2959, 2932,
! 2856
Intensity j Assignment/Comments
i
s aliphatic C-H
i 1733 m ketone/ester
j 1602
w
i 1459, 1328 m -CH?-
i 1438, 1246 s alkane
1 1328, 1102 in alkane
| 972
m aromatic figerpoint
! 835 w aromatic
i 746 w i aromatic
I
j 698
w unassigned
i
i
i . i
i i
i
j
j
!
i
I
•
i i
i- •
i .. -.'., ...,;, /
i
';•".••
I
•
OTHER REMARKS:
8-56
-------
TABLE 8-63,
IP. REPORT
8B-LC6, ammonia liquor, pH 12 extract: 1C cut ~6 IR
Wave Member , . . . ,. !
<~> , Intensity '• Assignment/Comments
(cm ') I
3343. 3144 m JOH. NH
3062 s aromatic C-H ;
2932 s aliphatic C-H I
2863
m ialiphatic C-H
2713, 2610 m H-bonded OH, NH
1733 m jketone, ester
1595 i s laromatic, C-1-1-^
1507, 1472 1 s aromatic, methyl , methyl ene
1376 | m jmethyl CH bend i
1239 s jester, ether, CH stretch of aromatic amine
787 s i
i
1
t
!
i
i
t -
i
I
1 i
• i
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly aromatic amines, esters of aromatic acids, or diphatic
or aromatic ethers.
8-57
-------
TABLE 8-64.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 8B-LC7, ammonia liquor, pH 12 extract: 1C cut #7 IR
Wwt Number
(em'1)
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
2932
! aliphatic C-H
2856
1616
m
m
aliphatic C-H
1733
s
! ketone,
ester
aromatic C-—
1459
m
1 aromatic, methyl, methylene
1383
m
methyl CH bend
1246
m
ester, ether
1171
m
ester, ether
746
w
aromatic, C-C1, diphatic
3596
w (broad)! unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
Probable ester.
8-58
-------
TlPLE:
TABLE 8-65,
i'R REPORT
parator: XAO-£ resin,
Wave Number ,
* Intensity
(cm'1}
64
'56, 2926,
2854
'23
501
195
w
s
m
m
w
154 | w
>62, 1069
w
5 ! m
713, 1693,
L182, 1022, 82
w
*
•
Assignment/Comments
aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
aliphatic CH stretch
ketone or ester
conj. olefine and/or aromatic C-L-L-LC
aromatic C-1-^
aliphatic CH bend
aromatic ester 0-CO-O stretch
substituted aromatic compds
unassigned
I
ER REMARKS:
This sample possesses less mass than that required by Level 1 criteria for IR
ilysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained, however, since Fourier Trans-
'm IR techniques were utilized.
Sample appeared to contain ..principally aliphatic and aromatic ketones and esters.
;o, large peak at 1602 cm~l indicates significant amounts of conjugated olefins.
8-59
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-66.
IR REPORT
Froth flotation separator, XAD-2 resin, IR on concentrate
! W«vt Number i
j (cm'1)
J3072, 3054, 3007! w
1 1956-1674 | w
J1592, 1387
i
Atrignmwt/Comnwim
aromatic and olefinic CH
aromatic overtones/combinations
w,m jo-substituted naphthalene, or
conjugated vinyl C-:-^C stretch
11269-1005
w
Jaromatic fingerprint region
J958
782-700
m
s-m
! !
j 1504, 847, 618
!
i
j
i
i
i
w
vinyl CH bend, or aromatic in- plane bend
substituted aromatic compds
unassigned
i
i
I
OTHER REMARKS:
•Sample contains substituted aromatic and/or unsat. hydrocarbons. Large band at
782 cnr * suggests that sample is predominantly naphthalene, i.e., band at 782 cm"1
is the resultant of CH out-of-plane bending of 4 adj. aromatic H.
8-60
-------
TABLE 8-67.
IS REPORT
JIPL£. "'-"ocr> notation separator, XAD-^ resin, LC c«r. ~~ .'-
Wave Number , . . , ._
_1 Inteiurty i Assignment/Comments
(cm )
2954, 2932,
2856
1740
1459
1438, 1376
s aliphatic CH stretch
i
m ester or aliphatic ketone
m
w aliphatic CH bend
1 " ' '•
i
i
i
PER REMARKS:
8-61
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-68.
1R REPORT
Froth flotation separator, XAD-2 resin, LC cut 12 IR
Wmttwnber
(cm'1)
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
2958, 2927,
aliphatic CH stretch
2857
1741
1464, 1378
1261
1078, 1041
863, 749, 702
802
!
1613, 1604
I • . . ..
w
m,w
ester
aliphatic CH bend •
s (ester of aromatic or a,8-unsaturated acids
s
w
s
w
aliphatic ethers, or esters
substituted aromatic
substituted aromatic— predominantly a-substituta
naphthalene or m-sub. benzene
unassigned
• • I
!
OTHER REMARK*
'This sample possessed less mass than that required by Level 1 criteria for IR
analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Sample predominantly esters of aromatic and/or a,B-unsaturated acids and/or
aromatic and aliphatic ethers.
8-62
-------
AMPLE:
TABLE 8-69.
:F REPORT
rroth flotation separator, XAD-2 resin, LC cir
Wive Number • • •
, -1, intensity- Assignment/Comments
(cm ?
1 j
2955-2854 s aliphatic CH stretch
1745-1730 I w
1465, 1381 w
1262, 1162,
w
1080
801, 719 w
ester or aliphatic ketone
aliphatic CH bend
aromatic ester or ether,
aliphatic ether
sub. aromatic compds
1
1481,1038,668| w | unassigned
' - .'"-'
•
i ' 1
. !
"
•
'
OTHER REMARKS:
•This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques. Spectrum includes peaks of Klntensity of blanks. Sample appears to
contain only aliphatic esters of aromatic acids, or aliphatic ketones.
8-63
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-70.
JR REPORT
Froth flotation separator, XAD-2 resin, LC cut #4 IR
Wm Number
Intensity
Assignmtnt/Comments
2955-2854
! 1756-1715
11462,1453
(1380,1368
746
1271,1163,1072
s aliphatic CH stretch
w
w
ketone or ester
aliphatic CH bend
w gem, -dimethyl bend
w
w
I
j
.-.--.-.-•-. ' ' •- • •
sub benzene
unassigned •
1 1 .
OTHER REMARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transfon
IR techniques.
Spectrum appears to contain predominantly alkylated aromatic hydrocarbons and
aliphatic ketones or esters of aromatic acids.
8-64
-------
Tfl,R!_r D..7]_
IR REPORT"
r'roth flotation separator, XAD-2 resin, LC cut ,?j 1R
Wave Number 1 ,
i Intensity
(cm ) ;
50 broad
52
w
Assignment/Comments
alcohol or phenol OH
aromatic CH stretch
59,2932,2856 | s | aliphatic CH stretch
26
m
32 m
55,1376
37,1253
'3,1075
m,w
m
w
3,698 | w
.3,1493,1027
w
•
•
1
aliphatic ketone, or ester
aromatic C-^-^
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic acid, or alcoholic or
phenolic C-0
ester of 10 and/or 20 ale.
mono-sub, benzene
unassigned
1
ER REMARKS:
•Sample contains' primarily sat. hydrocarbons, aliphatic esters of aromatic acids,
dominantly benzoates, and alcohols or phenols.
8-65
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-72.
1R REPORT
Froth flotation separator, XAD-2 resin, LC cut #6 IR
Wive Number
(cm'1) lBtenaty
Assignment/Comments
2956,2927,2854 s aliphatic CH stretch
1729
1452 .
1380,1371
758,743
s
w
w
w
1258,1244 w
1077,1032
m
1601,1464
I
I
w
ketone or ester
aliphatic CH bend
geminal -dimethyl CH bend
substituted aromatic
ester or aromatic acid, or aromatic and/or
aliphatic ethers
unas signed
1
I
!
OTHER REMARKS;
'This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transfo
IR techniques.
Sample contains predominantly alkyla.ted aromatic esters and/or ethers.
8-66
-------
IPLE:
TABLE 8-73.
IR REPORT
Froth flotation separator, XAD-2 resin, LC cut = 7 IR
Wave Number
(on'1)
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
52,2930,2854
W.1732
51,1380
58,1076,1032
3,743,723
57,3091,1604,
1553,1121
s
s
w
w
w
-
aliphatic CH
aliphatic ketone, or ester
aliphatic CH bend
acetates or primary or secondary alcohols,
or aromatic ethers
sub. aromatic compds
unassigned
!
IER REMARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
techniques.
Sample appears to contain predominantly aliphatic esters (acetates), cyclic
turated ketones, and some aromatic material.
8-67
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-74.
IR REPORT
1XR-P, froth flotation separator, canister rinse:
preliminary IR
Wtve Number
(em'l)
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
3050
2970,2925,2848
1720,1712
1640,1595
1440,1420,1375
1265
1140-1125
890
860-700
700-650
J2550.2540.2400,
1070-970
.
w
w
w
w
m,m,w
aromatic CH stretch
aliphatic CH stretch
aliphatic ketone and esters;
aromatic C-1-^
aliphatic CH bend
s j ester of a,6-unsat. or aromatic acid
w
w
w
w
w
or aromatic ester
aromatic and/or aliphatic ethers
or aromatic esters
substituted aromatic onpds.
substituted aromatic compds
substituted aromatic cmpds.
unas signed
1
OTHER REMARKS:
"Sample contains predominantly unsat. and/or aromatic ethers and esters of aroma
acids or aromatic ethers. Bands at 1712, 1440, and 1420 cm"1 suggest that aliphatic
ketones or esters of saturated acids are present:(-CH2-(C=0)-absorbs at 1420) spectr
dominated by band at 1265 on"1 suggesting sample predominantly aromatic ethers.
8-68
-------
TABLE 8-75.
in REPORT
JMPIP. l^R-p, froth flotation separator, canister rirsr-: co^r^r^ te IR
Wave Number
, -1, Intensity Assignment/Comments
tcm ) |
|
3043. 3007 1 w aromatic or olpfinir PH
2959, 2946,
2856
1737
?061, 1936
1598
1452, 1380
1259
1096, 1023
842, 812, 751
2366. 878
s aliphatic CH
1
m
w
m
m,w
•'•'-•' m
m,w
w,w,m
w
-
•
ester or aliphatic ketone
aromatic ovprtonps/rnmbi nations
aromatic C-^-1-^.
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic -or a.e-urrsat. 'a-cid
ester, aliphatic ether
sub. aromatic cmpds
unassianed
:
i
REMARKS:
.This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria
for IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier
Transform IR techniques.
Sample appears to contain primarily esters of aromatic or a,B-unsat. acids
and 1° and/or 2° alcohols. Peak at 1598 cnrl due to org. nitrates or substituted
aromatic cmpds. which occasionally show a large, broad unresolved peak in this
region.
8-69
-------
TABLE 8-76.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
1XR-LC1. froth flotation seoarator. canister ringer I r rut.^1 TR
Wm Number
(em'1)
2959, 2931, 285*
1465
1376
718
1739, 670
i
Intensity
S
.ra
w
w
w
•
A0tflUM0t/COIMMI!tS
aliohatic. CH stretch
aliohatic. CH bend
isolated methyl, CH bend
-(CH2)jj-rocking
unassiqned
'
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly sat. hydrocarbons, containing a trace of ketone.
8-70
-------
T/IP> r o -77
&MPLE: 1XR-LC2. f^oth -notation ^pnavatnr_ rani «;tpr . v-i ngo-. J_r r.i* j-9 n
Wave Number
(on'1)
1048
!925, 2852
,602
452
42-705
925, 1301, 1246
1185, 1136, 102
;
Intensity
m
m
m
m
s
9
4 w
•
Assignment 'Comments
aromatic C-H
aliphatic C-H
aromatic
aromatic, methyl
aromatic aliphatic
•
unassigned
i
mREMARKS:
High concentration of aromatic material.
8-71
-------
TABLE 8-78.
IR REPORT1
SAMPLE: 1XR-LC3, froth flotation separator, canister rinsgl 1C cut *3 IR
Wave Number
(em'1)
3052
Intensity
S
2957, 2926, 285t
1927, 1000, 178IJ)
1599
1456, 1440
1382
1195-1025
J880, 843, 811,
ABtgnment/Commege
aromatic or olefinic CH
aliphatic CH
aromatic combinations and overtones
aromatic or olefinic C-C
aliphatic CH
methyl CH
fingerprint region-aroma tics
744, 748
substituted aromatic cmpds
1731, 949. 711
r 090
w
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample contains significant amounts of aromatic hydrocarbons,
8-72
-------
TABLE 8-79.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 1XR-LC4, froth flotation separator
r.i.-T. *•*
Wm Number
(cm'1)
•
3502
3055
2959, 2925, 28
1925-1712
1602
1459, 1451
1376
1263-1017
| 304, 746, 725
!
Intensity
s
m
ke s
w
m
s
w
m-w
m-s
Assignment/Comments
2° atninp
aromatic or olefinic CH strpt.rh
aliphatic CH stretch
aromatic combination/overtones
aromatic or olefinic C-^'C
aliphatic CH bend
methyl CH bend
fingerprint region aromatic
substituted aromatic cmpds.
867, 842, 7001 |
filfi, "ififi i w i unassianed
j
i
i
i
1
i
!
i
!
-
1THER REMARKS:
Probable alkylated aromatic amines.
8-73
-------
TABLE 8-80.
1R REPORT
SAMPLE: 1XR-LC5. froth flotation separator, canister HHSP: 1C cut ^5 TR
i Wm Number
i (cm'1)
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
! 3357
1 3055
I 2959, 2932, 28
w (broad) alcoholic or
w aromatic CH
36 s ! aliphatic CH
phenolic OH or amine
i 2226, 2075
w
conjugated C=N, or unsymmetric
1733
1602
1458, 1376
1260
1095, 1027
801, 753
1177, 876, 690
m
m
m,w
m
m
m,w
w
disub. acetylenic -C=C-
ester or aliphatic ketone
aromatic C-^C
aliphatic CH bend
Phenolic C-0 aromatic ether, ester or aromatic
ester, alcohol, phenol, 2° aromatic amine
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
!
OTHER REMARKS:
Shape peak at 1260 possibly due to 0-NH-R absorption.
Sample predominantly alkylated phenols or secondary aromatic amines, or aroma
esters.
8-74
-------
tfPLE:
TABLE 8-81.
1R REPORT
1XR-LC6. froth flotation separator, canister
T rut Jfi TR
Wave Number
(cm'1)
$2
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
w aromatic CH stretch
59, 2932, 2856J s | aliphatic CH stretch
f62
'40
i50
i02
i52, 1376
m
m
ketene or ketenimine, or keazoketone
ketene, ester or aliphatic ketone
m j aliphatic diazoketone
m
m
aromatic C-1-1-^
aliphatic CH •
!67-1177 m j aliphatic or aromatic C-0
is, 752
.09, 1020, 704.
£
w,m
w
.
substituted aromatic
unassigned
'1
HER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly aromatic and saturated and/or unsaturated hydrocarbons but
appear to contain some aliphatic esters and aliphatic diazoketones.
8-75
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-82.
!R REPORT
1XR-LC7. froth flotation separator, canister
i r rut #7 TP
Wm Nwnber
(an'1)
3055'
295f, 2932, 2856
2oer
1746
1465, 1383
1074
821, _ 753
J1644, 1609, 1348
1314, 1178, 952
691
- '•
Intensity
W
S
S
m
m,w
m
w
.
i
i
w
•
Asagnmmt/Comintiits
aromatic CH stretch
aliphatic CH stretch ! ~~
ketene or ketenimine (C=C=0) (^C*C=N-)
ketene, ester or aliphatic ketone
aliphatic CH bend
aromatic ester ethyl or n-oroDvl C-C
substituted aromatic or ethyl or n-propyl C-C .....
unassi gned
;
• ' •
' ' •
OTHER REMARK*
Band at 3261" believed to be due to presence of H90 in IR cell
No- strong bands in region 1300-1000 cnr* except at*1074 cm-1 suggest that
absorption at 1746 cm-1 due to ester of saturated acid.
Sample predominantly saturated esters, ketenes, or ketenimines.
8-76
-------
TABLE 8-83.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
2X-P. final cooler cooling tower vapor, XAD-2 resin: preliminary IR
Wm Number
(em'1)
3034
2966, 2932,
2875, 2864
1723
1604, 1491
1456, 1377
1269, 1110,
1076
798, 753, 702
1025
*
^
i
I
Intensity
W
S
s
m, w
m, w
m, s , m
w, w, m
w
Assignment/Comments
aromatic or olefinic CH
aliphatic CH stretch
ketone or ester
aromatic or olefinic C-^-^-^-C
aliphatic CH
ester or aromatic acid, or aromatic and/or
aliphatic ethers
sub. aromatic cmpds.-2 and 5 adj.' hydrogens
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS: . '
.Sample contains predominantly aromatic and aliphatic esters and/or ethers.
Bands in aromatic CH out-of-plane region suggest monosubstituted and p-disubsti-
tuted benzenes are predominant.
8-77
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-84.
IR REPORT
2X-C. final cooler cooling tower vapor. XAD-2 resin:
conteentrate |R
1 Wtvt Number
(enf1)
3094. 3053. 30Qi
2965 1 2934, ?Rfit5
1674-1955
1597, 1426
781-699
QR7
._
1568, 1509, 1456
1391, 1274, 124
! ,
-
Intensity
> w.m.w
w
w
ra
s-m
••W
...
J5
•
a
Asngnmmt/Commtnts
^rom^tir nr olftf i nir- ,PH .c^-yol-r^
t .
aliphaMr TH ctretr.h
arot|iatic pvertones/co^pbi nations
condensed aromatic C— C. a-sub. naohthalenes. conij
vinyl •-,.-... .;
substituted aromati c cnqMte . ^
viny] CH ou^-of-plane bend qr ai»nijia1;ic fn-nlanp honi
unassigned
•
*
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample contains'predominantly aromatic hydrocarbons. Bands at 1597, 1426, and
781 cnr.l highly suggestive of o-substituted naphthyl derivatives. Some saturated
hydrocarbons are present as evidenced by weak bands at 2965-2865 cnrl. Strong band
at 950 curl characteristic of conjugated vinyl group.
8-78
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-85.
IR REPORT
2X-LC1, final cooler cooling tower vapor, XAD-.2. resin:
.C cut 31 IR
Wave Number
(em'1)
2961. 2972, 285?
1460, 1375
•
!
Intensity I
i
S
rruw
:
~
•
Assignment/Comments
aliphal-ir PH strotrh
aliphatic CH bpnd
!
OTHER REMARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transfer
IR Techniques.
Sample contains only saturated hydrocarbons.
8-79
-------
TABLE 8-86.
1R REPORT
SAMPLE-. 2X-LC2. final cooler coaling tower vanor. XAD-? rpsin- i r rut a? TP
Wive Number
-------
TABLE B-R?
IK REPORT
fWPlF- 2X-LC3, final, coole^ coolinc tower v?>pnr, .XAn-? rpcin- ir mt *7 Tt>
Wave Number i
« Intensity , Assignment/Comments
(cm '}
3030 ! w aromatic or ol^finir TH
2965, 2930, 2859 s aliphatic CH stretch
,1738
1456, 1380
1
w ' ketone or ester
m aliphatic CH bend
1263, 1151, 102^ w aster of aromatic acid, aromatic ether, aliphatic
ether
799, 775, 751, 699 w,w,w,m substituted aromatic CH bend
,.603, 1492, 893
I
j
j
•
.
1
i
•
w unassicmed
i i
i
.
•
|
•
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons, with some aromatic and
aliphatic esters and/or aromatic and aliphatic ethers present.
8-81
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-88.
IR REPORT
2X-LC4, final cooler cooling tower vapor. XAD-2 resin:
LC cut ^4 IR
Wm Number
leaf1)
2959, 2929,
2859
1738
1462, 1380
1268, 1116,
1028
799, 752, 711
1661, 1603,
1069
1-
.-•-.. t V. - -
Innnsity
S
m
m
m, w, w
w
Assignment/Comments
aliphatic CH stretch
ketone or ester
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic acid (0-CO-O) aliphatic or
aromatic ether (C-O-C)
substituted aromatic cmpds.
unas signed
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons, containing some
esters of aromatic acids, and/or aromatic or aliphatic ethers.
8-82
-------
TABLE 8-89.
IR REPORT
2X-LC5, final cooler coolino tower vapor. XAD-2 resin: I r rut.
TR
Wave Number \
(cm'1)
q59, 2930, 2859
732
603
462, 1380
1280, 1128
•
740, 711
1075
....
Intensity ;
I
S
S
w
m,w
s,m
w
w
i
•
I
•
0
*
Assignment/Comments
aliphatic CH st.rptrh
ester or eliohatic kptonf
aromatic or olefinic C-^'C
aliphatic CH bend
aliphatic ester of aromatic acid, aromatic or
aliphatic ether
substituted aromatic
unassigned
.-
1
OTHER REMARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for IR
analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform IR
techniques.
Sample appears to contain predominantly aliphatic esters of aromatic acids and/or
aromatic of aliphatic ethers.
8-83
-------
TABLE 8-90.
1R REPORT
SAMPLE: 2X-LC6f final rooler cooling tnwpr vapnr, XAD-?
IT
Wave Number
(cm'1)
3063
2959, 2930, 2859
1726
1603
1462, 1380
1274, 1116
752, 711, 693
1497
Intensity
w
S
S
m
m,w
m,rn
m-w
W
- - • •
" - ---• -•."-'•"'.•• ' • • '. ~
•
Assignment/Comments
aromatic nr nlpfinir TH
aliohatic CH strptch
ester or aliphatic ketone
aromatic or olefinic C-:-i-:C
aliphatic CH
ester of aromatic or a,B-unsaturated acids
substituted aromatic cmpds
una«;<;ionprf
- •- - • . " . . -
-
1
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly esters of aromatic or
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-91.
1R REPORT
ZX-LC7, final cooler cooling tower vapor. XAD-2 resin: 1C rut. #7 TR
r
Wm Number
(cm'1)
2953, 2930, 285^
1726 !
1603
1450, 1374
1274, 1045
1110
722
3323. 3096. 1668
1556, 940
tt
Intensity
!
5
m
m
m
m
s
w
w
•
Assignment/Comments
alinhat.ir HH <;trpfrh
ester of aliphatir kpfnnn
aromatic of olefinic C-^^C
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic or a,6-unsat. acid
aliphatic ether
sub. aromatic, predominantly 4 adj. H
unassigned
•
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample contains'predominantly aliphatic ethers with evidence of esters of aromatic
or a,e-unsaturated acids.
8-85
-------
TABLE 8-92.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 2XR-P, final cooler COOlina tow&r vapor. rairistpr rrn<;p' nrc!H.m-inav\/ TD
Wive Number
Intensity
Atttgnmeflt/Commefm
(cm'1)
3060
w
2963, 2927, 2862* s
1733
1603
1461, 1378
1414
!1260
1088 and 1023
J805, 864, 698
2064, 1946
i
i
I ^ -
j ----- •• :
s
ra
s,m
m
s
s
m
w
.aromatic or olefinic CH .
i
aliohatic CH
ester or aliphatic ketone
aromatic C--C
aliphatic CH
a-naphthalene, aliphatic CH
aromatic and aliphatic ethers and esters
aromatic fingerprint region
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassiqned
1
•
OTHER REMARKS: ,
Bands at 2363-2340 cm" are due to presence of C07 in cell.
Probable aliphatic esters of aromatic acids, and 51kylated'aromatic hydrocarbons,
8-86
-------
TABLE 8-93.
IR REPORT
Wwe Number
(cm'1)
J070
2966-2856
I1740
1667
1600
J1465
1410
1380
|1264
J1093-1020
|867-800, 697
2082, 1947, 666
!
!
!
i
1
-
•
a
;v
intensity Assignment/Comments
W arnmntir nr nlofimV PH
s aliphatic CH
m aliphatic ketone or ester
m aromatic ketone or olefinic C=C
w aromatic or com', olpfinir r=r
s aliphatic (methvlene) or aromatic C-C
m a-naphthalene, olefine, or paraffin
m methyl and a-naphthalene
s aromatic ethers, or esters
s , aliphatic ethers, aromatic C-C
s,m substituted aromatic CH bend
w unassigned
.
I
• !
OTHER REMARKS:
Teaks at 2365-2340 cm"1 due to presence of C0?
Bands at 867, 800, and 697 are suggestive of symmetrically substituted aromatic
rings, e.g.,. 1,3,5-trisubstituted benzene.
Probable aromatic hydrocarbons and alkylated derivatives and unsaturated hydro-
carbons.
8-87
-------
TABLE 8-94.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 9A-C. final cooler cnn!in? tnwpr hot, wpll . pH 7
rnnrpntrafp TR
Wivt Number
(cm-1)
3600. 3470
3300-3100
J3030, 3005
2920, 2960
1720
1615
1595, 1500, 1495
1455, 1375
1280-1266 '
1150, 1110, 1035
p35, 730
1415, 1320, 1175
930, 880, 690
-
•
Intensity
s
(broad)
s
s,m
s
s
s
,s,w
m-w
s,w,w
s,m
w
•
Anignmmt/CommtiTts
"Free" alrnhrvHr rtM ar^ma-hir ami nP^Jf r^a-LJMH
NH stretch Of H-bonded amirve or OH stretch of H-
bonded ale.
aryl or vi nyl CH stretch
alkyl CH stretch
aliphatic ketone or ester
NH banding of 1" amines
NH banding of 2" amines + aryl or vinyl C-^^c
alkyl, CH bend
aromatic CH bends or ester of a,e-unsat. acids or
aromatic acids, aromatic CN stretch, or aryl ether
a.liphatic or aromatic ester, aliphatic ether, or
amine C-N
substituted aromatic CH
•tmassigned
- ' - • . . . •'-,.,
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly amines, diphatic ketones or esters of aromatic acids, and
some alcoholic compounds.
8-88
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-95.
IR REPORT
9A-LC1, final cooler cooling tower hot well, pH 2 extract;
LC cut #1 IR
Wive Number
Intensity
(em0)
2964, 2916, 2821
1494
1462
1412, 1377
1333
863, 670
J1749, 1723, 995
w
s
s
m
s
m
w
;
•
H»ignmeni/uommenis
aliphatic CH stretch
aromatic C^-^C
aliphatic CH bend, or aromatic
aliphatic CH band
C-N of teriary amine
substituted aromatic CH band, alkane, or C-C1
•
unassigned
•
OTHER REMARKS:
•This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Sample appears to contain predominantly aliphatic and aromatic tertiary amines.
8-89
-------
TABLE 8-96.
1R REPORT
SAMPLE: 9A-I.E2. final rnnW rnnHng. tn^or hnt ...oil DH 2 extract: 1C nit. *? TR
Wave Number
(cm'1)
3055
2925, 2856
1725
J1602
Intensity
W
S
W
W
1453 m
11376
W
841, 814 j m
739
1191, 1034
t
1
S
W
•
Assignment/Comments
aromatic C-H, -CH0-halogen
aliphatic C-H
ketone, ester
aromatic C— C
aromatic, aliphatic
methyl CH bend
aromatic
aromatic, C-Cl
unassigned
_
OTHER REMARKS:
'This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR anal-ysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transfon
IR techniques.
8-90
-------
TABLE 8-97.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
9A-LC3, final cooler cooling tower hot well. pH 2 extract: 1C cut #3 IR
Wave Number
(cm'1)
3048
Intensity
m
2927 1 s
• . |
Assignment/Comments
aromatic C-H. -CFL-haloapn
L.
aliphatic C-H
2858 i m aliphatic C-H
1727
w
1601 . | m
1450
1380
1264
942
m
w
w
w
882 j m
812 m
ketone, ester
=> vnm A "f" T r* (^~ * • p
aliphatic CH bend
methyl CH bend
ester, ether
aliphatic, aromatic
aliphatic, aromatic
aliphatic, aromatic, C-Cl i
745
1184, 1163, 103&
w
i anpd
OTHER REMARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transfrom
IR techniques.
Probable PNA hydrocarbon.
8-91
-------
i nui_C. O~3O.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE- 9A-LC4, final cooler coolina tower hot wpll r pH ? pvtrart- ir rut £&. TO
Wave Number
(cm'1)
3418
3062
Intensity Assignment/Comments
i
S
W
2959, 2933, 285& w
1719
w
1459 s
1434
m
1095 m
[746
1
•
1
s
i
|
OH. NH
aromatic C-H
aliphatic C-H
ketone, ester
aromatic, aliphatic CH bend
aromatic, methyl, methyl ene
aromatic
multiplet-aromatic, C-C1
OTHER REMARKS:
"2363 and 2336 due to C02.
8-92
-------
»AMPIF. SA-L^5-
Wm Number
(cm'1)
3418
S, 2856
1719
1458
746
770
1287, 1095, 101?
•'-••; '•'••'
,,v^,;.:.
1 •• •-••
-
TABLE 8-99.
IR REPORT
final cooler rnnlirm tnwov hnt WP"!! nfe 2 pytrart- 1 Si rut #5 TD *
Intensity Assignment/Comments
W i f)H. NH
S ' aliohatic C-H
w ketone, ester
m ! aromatic, methvl , methvTene
m aromatic, C-C1
s aromatic, C-Cl
|
w unassigned
• '
.. __ -
OTHER REMARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IRanalysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
2363 and 2336 due to C02. Probable aromatic alcohol or amine.
8-93
-------
TABLE 8-100.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 9A-LC6. final cooler cooling t.nwpr hnt wpll, nH ? pyfrart- IT rut &F. JP
Wave Number i
1 ' Intensity
(cm"1)
3363 m
3041
2925
| 2856
1705
i 1596, 1506
1459
1376
m
s
m
s
s
s
ID
j 1287 s
753
i
i
i
m
. t . ....
- -••'•' • '-•''-.--•.:- .
•
-
1
i
-
Assignment/Comments
OH
aromatic C-H i
aliphatic C-H
aliphatic C-H
ketone, ester
aromatic C-^^C
aliphatic CH bend
methyl CH bend
ether ester of aromatic acid, alcohol, or phenol
substituted aromatic CH bend
i
!
.... . .1
"i
!
OTHER REMARKS:
Probable alcohols or aIkylated phenols.
8-94
-------
TABLE 8-101.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 9A-LC7. final cooler conlinn tnwpr hnt w
py-t-r
-IE.
Wive Number
, -1, Intensity Assignment/Comments
ten )
3287 w alcoholic, ohenolic. or an'riir OH
2927
s aliphatic C-H
2856 m | aliphatic C-H
1738
s ketone, ester
1693 m ketone, acid
1597, 1558 m
aromatic C— r
1455, 1417 m aromatic, methvl . methyl PHP
<•
J49 w'
unassigned ' ' - -•
! .... - . -. , .,- •' ' ' • •-
!
,a^fe,r,. •
<^ltl'--'V"->~* -
' W
•
i
i
1
•
OTHER REMARKS:
'This -sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for IR
analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform IR
techniques^.
Probable alkylated phenols, ketones or carboxylic acids.
8-95
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-102.
1R REPORT
9B-P. final cooler conling tnws.v hot wall. pH 1? Aytrart- nrallminarw TP
Wivt Numbtr
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
1cm'1)
3300, 3100 m (broad)
3058
2928, 2857
1727
1597
1502
1455, 1178
1106, 1059
746
834, 811
••••-• ...
w
alcoholic. OH nr aminp nr nmidp NH .
aromatic or olefim'c CH ,
s,m I aliphatic CH
s
s
ester or aliphatic ketone
aromatic C-^C, amine NK bend
in ) aromatic C— 'C
5
m
s(b)
w
•-
•
aliphatic CH bend, ester, aromatic ami OB C-N
ether, ester, aliphatic amine
-substituted aromatic. CH bend and NH bend of 1°
ami nes
.
unas signed
-
* V - . - • »
.
OTHER REMARKS:
•This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transfer?
IR techniques.
Doubled at 1242 and 1172 cm'1 highly suggestive of CN stretching of aromatic
amines. Probable alkylated aromatic amines, and esters of aromatic acids.
8-96
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-103.
IR REPORT
final cooler cooling tower hot well.
oH lay-extract: conrent.rat.P TR
, Intensity' Assignment/Comments
(cm1)
3620 I m
alcoholic free OH stretch
3600, 2900 | (broad) j alcoholic OH, amide or amine NH
3070, 3006 | s | aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
2990, 2959, 289(3 s,s
aliphatic CH stretch
1630, 1610 s 1° amine-NH bend, or amide
1590, 1515
m,s
1580, 1480 j s
1450, 1380, 135p w,m,w
1295 i m
1260
1190, 101£
850, 680
%
760, 700 ^
1325, 958, 950,
940 and 895
m (broad)
m-w
aromatic C-:-:-;C
aromatic 0-=-=-^
gem-dimethyl CH vibration
aromatic amine CH
aliphatic amine CH or alcohol
aromatic fingerprint region, ether, alcohol,
j aliphatic amine or amide
1
s (broad) 1° and/or 2° amine NH wagging and CH bend of
m
aromatic compounds, including heterocyclic amines
substituted benzene
-, i
w
•
unassigned
i
OTHER REMARKS:
'Samplfe predominantly alcohols, aniline, and alkylated anilines (both N- and ring
substituted). Bands at 1380 cm-1 and 1350 cm-1 suggest that alkylated derivatives
are primarily i-pr or t-bu compounds. Also, the series of bands in region of 1630 -
U50 may arise from heterocyclic aromatic amines such as pyridine and quinoline, as
well as from the carbon homologs.
8-97
-------
TABLE 8-104.
1R REPORT
SAMPLE: 9B-LC1, final cooler cool Ing tower hot well. oH 12 extract: LC .cut .
TR
Wm Number
(cm'1)
2956, 2926, 28si
1743
1 1464
1452, 1379
723
1258, 1021
i
i
!
1
I
i , - - . .
I - " '
I
|
Intensity i
3 s
w
m
w
w
w
[
.
•
'i
Asagnmmt/CerofiMim
aliphatic CH <;trptrh
ester, or aliphatic ketone
aromatic C-^ stretch, or aliphatic CH bend
aliphatic CH bend
-(CH2)4 - rocking or substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned • !.
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample contains predominantly saturated hydrocarbons and saturated ketones
Possibly small amounts of saturated esters.
8-98
-------
TABLE 8-105.
IR REPORT
-LC2, final cooler cnnllng
Wm Number
. .1, mtensrty , Assignment/Comments
lent i i
2954, 2926, 285^ s aliohatic r.H strptrh
S1462, 1450
11377
309
m aliphatic CH bend
w methyl CH bend
w substituted aromatic CH bend
1193, 1143, 11 1^ w
unassigned
.
^ . I
|
i
I
•;.^:U;:>:' •- •
• • " ,
'
•
|
-
i
OTHER REMARKS:
'This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for IR
analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform IR
techniques. f
Sample contains only saturated hydrocarbons with trace amounts of aromatic
compounds.
8-99
-------
TABLE 8-106.
!R REPORT
9B-LC3, final cooler coolina tower hot wpll . nH 1?
ir mt £•
Wive Number
ion'1}
2957, 2928, 285l
1733
1456, 1375
751
1687, 1288, 126!
j
Intensity
i S
m
m
w
i w
-
Ass^n limit/Coin ntftflls
aliohatic-CH
ester or aliphatic ketone
aliphatic CH bend
(-ChL). - or substituted aromatic
unassigned
1
-----
.
OTHER REMARKS:
Probable saturated hydrocarbons.
8-100
-------
TABLE 8-107.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 9B-LC3, final cooler cooling tower hot well. pH 12 extract: 1C tut £3 TR
Km Number
leaf1}
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
J2959, 2929, 2859
aliphatic CH stretch
11456
m
aliphatic CH bend
11379
w
methyl CH bend
1262
w
t-butyl
!J52
w
substituted aromatic CH bend
11738, 1597, 138p,
, 1021
w
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
Probable saturated and alkylated aromatic hydrocarbons
8-101
-------
TABLE 8-108.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 9B-LC4. final cooler cooling tiowpr hot
nH i? ovtyart
ir rut
TD
Wm Number
{cm-1)
2956, 2927, 2851
1735
1604, 1496
1455, 1377
1 1276, 1121
745, 698'
1216, 1073, 1021
_
luunuty
3 s
m
w
m,w
w
w
3 w
.
AsngnfiMnt/CamiMRts ••
\
aliphatic CH stretch
aliphatic ketone or ester
aromatic C— C stretch
aliphatic CH bend
fi
aromatic ester 0-C-O stretch
substituted aromatic CH or C-.C1
unassigned
,'
).
OTHER REMARKS:
•Sample appears to be predominantly aliphatic ketones, with some aromatic esters
of considerable aliphatic character present.
Shape spike § 668 curl remains unidentified.
8-102
-------
TABLE 8-109.
!R REPORT
Si 9B-LC5. final cooler cool i no t.nwpr hn+ wen
Wive Number
(em-1)
2959, 2932, 285E
1733
1465
J287, 1274
1123, 1075 j
146, 695
3244, 1602, 1582
1383, 952, 876
E
i
•
• •••''."•. i
^-,:,,
Intensity
> S
. s i
m
s
m
i
!
w i
-
Assignment/Comments
aliohatic CH
ester or aliphatic ketone
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic acid, aromatic ether
ester or ether
substituted aromatic CH bend, C-Cl
unassigned
I
I
i
OTHER REMARKS:
Probable aliphatic esters of aromatic acids,
8-103
-------
TABLE 8-110.
1R REPORT
SAMPLE-. 9B-LC6, final cooler coolino tower hot well- pH 1? pxtrart.r—IT rut
Wiw Nmnbtr
(em'1)
Intensity
Asstgnimnt/Comnwira
3500-2500
3055
broad
s
2924, 2856 | S
1595, 1506
1460, 1376
1246
897, 699
12068, 1924, 1314
s
m
s
s
1157, 1040, 944 w
i
I
•
1° or 2° amines and ]° nr 2° amides
aromatic CH
aliphatic CH
aromatic CA^, amide I and II bands
aliphatic CH bend
al-ipha-Hr nr> jpvnmjrtic £ ft
«:iih«:titiit«H arnma + i.r rompWin4s
unassianed
t
!
_
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample appears to be predominantly aromatic and aliphatic amines or amides
8-104
-------
TABLE 8-111.
!R REPORT
SAMPLE:
9B-LC7, final cooler cooling tower hot well. pH*>12 extract: 1C rut
TR
Wm Number
(cm'1)
J2953, 2930, 2854
Intensity
Assignment/Com menu
alkvl CH
12061
isothiocvanate or keterlminps f-N=C=S) ( C=C=M)
11603
unresolved C-^-=-C stretch of sub, aromatic compound
1756, 699
m
m
alkyl CH bend
substituted aromatic CH bend
11656, 1497, 1280
w
unassianed
OTHER REMARKS.
•This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IRanalysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Sample contains alkylated aromatic compounds and/or alkyl or aryl isothiocyanates
orketeri mines.
8-105
-------
TABLE 8-112.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 10A-P. final cooler cool/ing tnwpr rnlH
p.H .2 extract- nrpl-iminar\/ TP
Wive Number
(cm'1)
3500-3200
3056
2959, 2918,
2849
1712
i 1689-1644 '
1603, 1495
1461, 1380
Intensity
w (broad)
w
m,s,s
s
m
m,w
Assignment/Comments
.alcoholic or phenolic OH
aromatic or olefinic CH
aliphatic CH stretch
ketone, ester
ketone, acid
aromatic O^T . . .
allohatic CH bend.
1243
s (broad)
phenol, alcohol, acid, ester
809, 741, 698
i 1724, 1432,
| 1123, 1009
837
! - : -•••• ::"
•
m,s,m
•
w
|
i
t
i
•
sub. aromatic CH bend
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
Probable aIkylated phenols and carboxylic acids.
8-106
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-113.
!R REPORT
10A-C. final cooler cooling tower cold well. pH-?
TP
Wive Number
(cm'1)
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
3620, 3500
free alcoholic or ohenolic OH
3500-2900
3030
2950, 2890
1712 j
1630, 1610
1520, 1500
1465, 1390,
1365
1190-1160, 1115
890, 845, 695
1422, 1330,
1320, 1290,
1275, 1040, 9^
-,;
CM
2 (broad bands) banded OH-alcohol or phenol
s aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
s aliphatic CH stretch
w ketone or ester
s (broad) substituted aromatic C-^-C
s aromatic or olefinic C-^^-C,
s,m,m i aliphatic CH bend
' s,m alcoholic or phenolic C-0, or aliphatic ethers
w,m,w substituted aromatic CH
i
.
5 w | unassigned
1
I
1
•
i
OTHER REMARKS:
"Sample predominantly alcohols, and alkylated phenols. Small peak at 1712 cm
suggests that small quantities of carboxylic acids, ketones, and/or esters might
be present.
8-107
-------
TABLE 8-114.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: IQA-LCl. final cooler cooling, tower cold well. oH 2 extract.;. I r rut .n. TD
1 Wm Nurnbir
(cm'1)
2949, 2923,
2854
1748, 1711
1463, 1379
i -
1154, 1197
-
1
Inttntity
S
w
w
, .. ,...; ,-.. .
w
!
- ,,,:-:,;----|-^--, •.•:•::.,,--,
. j - - •-_...
•
.
i .. : ,
!
I
Assignment/Comments
alkyl CH stretch ... • .-• ' -,.
ester and/or ketone
alkyl CH bend
', ' -''..' ':
unasslgned
1 .••••""
.,. * 0 ••
V .,- - . - -J
1
•'
OTHER REMARKS:
'This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transfons
IR techniques.
Sample appears to contain only aliphatic hydrocarbons, esters, and ketones.
8-108
-------
SAMPLE:'.
TABLE 8-115.
!R REPORT
10A-LC2. final Cooler cooling -Hhwov <-n"IH WP! 1 -InH 2 pvtrart- "IT rut £? TR
*•"-*•' Intensity
(cm'1)
3045 , w
2954, 2926, |
2857 i s-
Assignment/Comments
aromatic or olefinic CH
aliphatic CH stretch
1726 j w ketone or ester
~1459, 1378 j m,w
1261
w
841-699 w
1039, 876 w
-' """-- •
aliphatic CH bend
aromatic ester C-CO-0 stretch
aromatic CH bending (substituted)
unassigned
'
!
1
•
.. I
OTHER REMARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for IR
analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques. .
Sample predominantly saturated and aromatic hydrocarbons, with some aromatic and/or
esters.
8-109
-------
TABLE 8-116.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 10A-LC3. final cooler cooling tower cold well. pH 2 pxtrart!
ir rut
TP
W«vt Number
i (caT1)
2942, 2930,
Intensity
2859 I - s
t !
1462
840
746
881
m
m
Asstgnnwfit/ConniMnts
aliphatic CH stretch
aliphatic CH bend
aromatic, unsaturated CH bend
s | aromatic CH. bend
w
unassigned
I
1
*
>'-.-.'". - , . • •
i
*
OTHER REMARKS:
•This sample possessed less mass than the required by the Level 1 criteria for IR
analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Probably alkylated aromatics.
8-110
-------
TABLE 8-117.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 10A-LC4, final cooler cooling tower cold well
M 7
[tract
Wm Number
Ion'1)
intensity
Assignment/Comments
3398
s
2952, 2932, |
2863
s
[1719 ! s
1452 j s
1027
146, 725
m
s
phenolic or alcoholic OH
aliphatic CH stretch
ketone/ester
aliphatic CH bend
ether, aliphatic ester
(-CH,,-). or substituted aromatic CH bend
i
1
OTHER REMARKS:
'Probable aliphatic ketones, esters, or ethers and/or alkylated phenols.
8-111
-------
TABLE 8-118.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 10A-LC5> final cooler cooling tower cold well. nH 2 extract: LC rut
TR
Wm Monitor
(cm'1)
3411
3336
2959, 2932, 28
1712
Intnsfty
S
m
56 s
m
1602, 1589. j w
1452, 1342
s
1090, 1013 1 m
I
739
1280, 1218,
3055, 698
i
•-•• ..•'_.'••''''• - - ' • • ' * •' --* '-
s
w
.
, i ' • *
•
*«~«
alcoholic or phenolic OH
alcoholic or phenolic OH
aliphatic CH
ketone or ester
aromatic or .olefinic C-^^C
aliphatic CH bend
phenolic or alcoholic CO stretch, aliphatic ether
or ester
- substituted aromatic CH bepd or C-C1
unas signed
• •
OTHfR REMARK*
Probable allocated phenols and some aliphatic ketones and/or esters.
8-112
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-119.
1R REPORT
10A-6, final cooler cooling tower cold well. oH 2 extract: If nit #f> TR
Wive Number •
.1 Intensity j Assignment/Comments
(on )
3300-2500 s (broad) carboxylic acid OH phenolic OH stretch
3034
s aromatic CH stretch
2959, 2924,
2863 s
aliphatic CH stretch
1698 i s asym. C=0 stretch for saturated and unsaturated/
1
1595 s
1500-1600 ! m
1458, 1376 m,w
1266, 1157, 1026 m
835, 773, 752,
691
2068, 1869, 93]
m
aromatic carboxylic isomer
aromatic C-^-C
aromatic C-:-:-C
aliphatic CH
C-0 of carboxylic acids and phenols
aromatic compounds-substituted
•
L W
unassigned
•
|
•
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly aromatic and aliphatic carboxylic acids and/or alkylated
phenols.
8-113
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-120.
1R REPORT
10A-LC7, final cooler cooling tower cold well. pH 2 extract: LC cut #7 IR
WweNnmbw
(cm'1)
2962, 2920,
2852 *
1738
1703
1618, 1439 (?)
1104, 1042 '
1676, 863,|34
...
Intuisity
m
m •
s . • . • :
- m
.. ,. m-. ... ...-••-.••
•-
w
1
i
- •
-
.
.-
.
AsBgnrnnt/ConHneBts
alkyl CH stretch
ester, or al 1 phatl c ketone
ketone or ester
aroaattc or olefinic C-**-C
al^atic Others, or 2° alcohol
MaAsljned
1
•
•-
OTHER REMARKS:
This sample possessed less njass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques. .
Sample appears to contain only residual aliphatic ketones and esters.
8-114
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-121.
IR REPORT
1QB-C, final cooler cooling tower cold well, pH 1€ extract: concentrate IR
WIM Norabtr
| (em1)
1 3400 -3000
Intensity
s( broad)
Assignment/Comments
amine or amide NH stretch
aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
, 2870
m
aliphatic CH stretch
12151, 2055
w
ketenes (OC=0) and isothiocyanates
11705, 1664
amide I bands (N=C=S)(C=0 stretch)
1604, 1515
amide II bands (N-H bend) or amine NH bend, or
aromatic
1500
aromatic C-1-:-i-C
1445 1 s
J1376
1322
1267- 1034
i 900- 800
i$mi
1548
'
,' .
m
w
m( broad)
s,m
w
•
aliphatic CH or saturated 1° amide . . ':
aliphatic CH bend
aromatic amine C-N
aromatic fingerprint region and/or ami no C-N
stretching
amine and/or amide NH bend -
monosubstituted benzene
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly aryl and/or alky! amines and amides; bands at 3062,
1664, 1604, 815, 746, and 691+1 strongly suggesting that appreciable amounts of
aniline, N-alkylated aniline, and/or amides of benzoic acid are present.
8-115
-------
TABLE 8-122.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 10B-LC1, final cooler cooling tower cold well. pH 12 extract: 1C cut 11 IR_
W«vt Number
(cm'1)
2957, 2928,
2853
1750
1462, 1375
Inttflsity
S
W
nuw
1467, 722
w
"
i
!
i
i
i
AwfamMt/Commmts
aliphatic CH stretch
ketone or ester
aliphatic CH bend
unassigned
-
.
- -
-•
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample contains predominantly saturated hydrocarbons.
8-116
-------
IMbLt 8-J
iR REPORT
10B-LC2, final cooler cooling tower cold well, nfj 12 extract: Lc cut #2 IR
•m Number
1 (»1>
2854, 2956,
2947, 2424
H57, 1463,
1380
1261, 1161
105, 1038
!%804
DO, 1586
,s..'-
Intensity
s
m
w
w
w
w
1
1
Assignment/Comments
aliphatic CH stretch
aliphatic CH bend
aromatic or aliphatic ether
aromatic or aliphatic ether
substituted aromatic CH bend or C-C1 • .
•
unassigned '•-•..••
I
this sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
Kaalysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
N techniques.
Probable saturated hydrocarbons, with some aromatic or aliphatic ethers.
8-117
-------
TABLE 8-124.
1R REPORT
SAMPLE: 1QB-LC3, final cooler cooling tower cold well. pH 12 extract: 1C cut #3 IR
Wave Number
(em'1)
2959, 2929,
2859
1738
1462, 1380
1262
1028
J746, 722
Intensity
S
W
w
W
w
w
•
Assignment/ Comments
aliphatic CH stretch
ester or aliphatic ketone
aliphatic CH bend
alkane, aromatic, aromatic ether, ester of
aromatic acid
aromatic or aliphetic ether ester of aromatic acid
-(CHg)^ - rocking or substituted aromatic CH bend
OTHER REMARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Probable diaphatic esters of aromatic acids, or aliphatic or aromatic ethers.
8-118
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-125.
1R REPORT
, Final cooler cooling tower cold well, pH 12 extract: LC cut #4 IR
Wive Number
(cm'1)
2959, 2929,
2859
1730
1456, 1380
1116
746, 711
1439
s--
1
•
•
-
Intensity
S
m
m,w
w
w
w
•
Assignment/Comments
aliphatic CH stretch
ester or aliphatic ketone
aliphatic CH bend
saturated ester and/or ether
substituted aromatic CH bend
•
unassigned .....
.... • % ' - •_ "..-
.
• •'•'' '••.*,. .' " • - •
'
OTHER REMARKS:
•TnTs sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for IR
analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform IR
techniques.
Sample contains predominantly aliphatic hydrocarbons and/or esters, with some
substituted aromatic compounds.
8-119
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-126.
IR REPORT
10B-LC5, final cooler cooling tower cold well, pH 12 extract: LC cut #5, IR
WmNumtar
(em'1)
2962, 2923,
2853
1648
1508
1460
680
1750
Intimity
w
m
m
m
m
w
• -
;.
•
AsstyflffiMtt/ Con invnti
aliphatic CH stretch
term vinyl, NH2 in plane bending
-NH-, aromatic O^-^C
aliphatic CH, aromatic or olefinic C-^^-K)
-NH9- out of plane bending or aromatic CH bend
unas signed
OTHER REMARKS:
•Probable saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons, or alkylated aromatic derivatives.
8-120
-------
IMCLt b-
IR REPORT
SAWLE. 10B-LC6, final cooler cooling tower cold well, pH 12 extract: -1C cut #6 IR
W« Number
(cm ')
3671 - 3165
3062
s
Assignment/Comments
alcohol , amine, amide
s j aromatic CH stretch
2925, 2856 s
2733, 2603
1678
1596, 1507
|465, 1376
1267 - 1246
1157, 1122,
1040
tt, 787, 752
691
1314, 945
m
ID
s
s,w
aliphatic CH stretch
saturated amine
amide I band
aromatic C^-^C, NH bending of 1°
amide or amine
aliphatic CH bend
s alcohol, aromatic ether, '
m
s
aromatic amine .... ,
ether, alcohol, phenol, amide NH
bend or amine CN
sub. aromatic CH bend
w unassigned
-
OTHER REMARKS:
Probable alkylated aromatic amines.
8-121
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-128.
IR REPORT
10B-LC7, final cooler cooling tower cold well, pH 12 extract: LC cut #7 IR
Wm Number
(cm'1)
K-3569
(3267
2925, 2856
2062
llltMSity
S
s( broad)
s
m
1657 s
1602
1541 - 1507
1459, 1376
1287
1123 - 1075
753 - 698
828
•••-•' • ;
s
m
m
m
m
m
w
* ; •••••-• - ••• '• ;i--"
*
Asnoiunwit/ComiiiMts
alcoholic OH, ami-no NH stretch
alcoholic OH, amine or amide NH
aliphatic CH stretch
isothiocyanate
conj. olefinic C^^C, amide
I band or amine NH bend
aromatic C-1-^, amine or 1° amide NH
aromatic C^C, 2° amide NH
aliphatic CH bend
aromatic amine CN stretch, aromatic ether
alcohol, ether, amine C-N
substituted aromatic CH bend
unas signed
OTHER REMARKS:
•This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for IR
analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform IR
techniques.
Probable alkylated aromatic amides and amines.
8-122
-------
IHDi-L O-
1R REPORT
SAMPLE: 3X"P» vapor above tar storage tank, XAD-2 resin* preliminary IR
•' .
WmNwnber
(em'1) j
Intensity ! Assignment/Comments
1
3060, 3031 w
aromatic or olefinic CH
2964,2930, s aliphatic CH stretch
2874
1
1725 m ketone or ester
1602, 1495 m
US,- 1376
m,w
T275, 1106, m
^1067
aromatic CH bend
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic acid, aromatic
and/or aliphatic ether
802, 751» 701 w,w,m j sub. aromatic CH bend
1027, 892, 830 w
••---•-,--
unassigned
!
-
OTffill REMARKS:
•Sample predominantly aliphatic and aromatic esters and ethers. IR spectrum
suggests that sample is predominantly esters of aromatic acids and alkyl ethers.
8-123
-------
TABLE 8-130.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 3X-C, vapor above tar storage tank. XAD-2 resin: conrpntratP TR
Wtve Number
(on-1)
'3071, 3054,
3007
J2967 - 2863
1954 - 1676
J1595, 1387
1213 - 1011
958
785 - 698
1566, 1508,
1364, 843
' -V ' '
1
)
Intensity Atwgmnent/Commtttts
i
w,m,w
w
w
m
w
m
s-w
w
|
aromatic and/or olefinic CH
aliphatic CH stretch
aromatic overtone region
aromatic or conjugated olefinic C^-^C
aromatic fingerprint region
conjugated vinyl CH bend, or
aromatic in-plane bend
substituted aromatic CH bend
unas signed
"
OTHER REMARKS:
•Sample predominantly aromatic and unsaturated hydrocarbons.
8-124
-------
3X-LC1
IMbLE b-Ui.
IR REPORT
vapor above tar storage tank, XAO-2 resin:
LC cut #1 IR
Km Number
(cm'1)
2975, 2936,
2859
1513, 1464
1282, 1216, 970
"
t
i
. -,
•.-•
'
Intensity
S
m
m
•
•
Assignment/Comments
aliphatic CH
aliphatic stretch
aliphatic stretch
-
•
OTHER REMARKS:
•This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IRanalysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Probable aliphatic hydrocarbons.
8-125
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-132.
IR REPORT
3X-LC2, vapor above tar storage tank, XAD-2 resin:
LC cut #2 IR
Wm Number
(cm )
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
3060, 3025
w
aromatic CH stretch
2963, 2924,
aliphatic CH stretch
2857
1604, 1494
w
1455, 1375 m,w
800, 752
752, 699
w
w,m
1589, 1535, w
1261, 1029,
889
. . • •
. . V.V-' ••'•-••• '• ' ;
aromatic C— C stretch
aliphatic CH bend
sub. aromatic CH bend
sub. aromatic CH bend
unassigned
1
•
I
OTHER REMARKS:
•Sample predominantly saturated hydrocarbons and mono-substituted benzene.
8-126
-------
TABLE 8-133.
IR REPORT
3X-LC3, vapor above tar storage tank, XAD-2 resin: LC cut #3 IR
r u h i
1 *'ll*e*'*m er | Intensity Assignment/Comments
(tnT1)
13025
w aromatic CH stretch
061,2926, | s
i 2854
3741, 1732
11603, 1588,
r!494
ilfi, 1453,
ft' 1377 -••:
i$, 758, 705
aliphatic CH stretch
1
w
w
w
ester of aromatic acid, 0-CO-O •
aromatic C-1-^ stretch
aliphatic CH bend
•• .. .. 1 . " -
w,w,m
sub. aromatic compds, primarily
monosub. benzene
!
11263, 1072,
w | unassigned
1031, 893
J -V-'. ' •
• 1 !•! 1 II
•
__
OTHER REMARKS*
-Sample'predominantly saturated hydrocarbons, sat. ketones or ester, containing
trace of aromati c compds.
8-127
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-134.
IR REPORT
3X-LC4, vapor above tar storage tank, XAD-2 resin:
LC cut #4 IR
Wtvt Number
j (on'1)
i
Initially
J2959, 2930, s
1 2859
1726
1462
1456, 1380
1268, 1110,
1028
|799, 752, 711
1585, 1069
i
1
I-'-'-
i
i
i-
m
m
m,w
m,w,w
w,w,m
w
KmgnmMn/UMnnwnD
aliphatic CH stretch
ester, or aliphatic ketone
aromatic C-^-C
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic acid, aromatic and/or
aliphatic ether
substituted aromatic
unassigned
i
•
.......
•
OTHER REMARK*
•This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Sample contains predominantly alkylated esters of aromatic acids, and/or saturated
hydrocarbons.
8-128
-------
lABLt 8-135.
1R REPORT
3X-LC5, vapor above tar storage tank, XAD-2 resin: LC cut #5
r 1 •
Wivt Number . .
! Intensity , Assignment/Comments
(cm )
2959, 2932
s aliphatic CH stretch
"2856
1726
s | ester, or aliphatic ketone
1459, 1376 m,w aliphatic CH bend
1274, 1116, s,w ester of aromatic acid, aromatic
1075
or aliphatic ether
801,746, 712 w | substituted aromatic
-. • -•- .:
J1Q27 w unassignexl
i
!
i
"-
:
•
•
\
[" '
! ' "
•
•This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Sample predominantly saturated hydrocarbons and alkyl esters of aromatic acids
and/or alkyl and aryl ethers.
8-129
-------
TABLE 8-136.
1R REPORT
3X-LC6, vapor above tar storage tank, XAD-2 resin:
LC cut
IR
Wtvt Number j intensity ' A$»Bnm»nt/Comments
(cm'1) | |
3600 - 3200 ! w(broad) I alcoholic or phenolic OH
3065, 3029 I w i aromatic or olefi-nic CH stretch J
2959, 2928, ! s
2883 |
aliphatic CH stretch
1726 j s ( ester or aliphatic ketone
1604, 1514, j m,w,m
1497 1
1464, 1456 1 s
1378, 1357 j m
aromatic or conj. olefinic C-^-C
aliphatic CH bend
gem-dimethyl CH bend
1273, 1113 ! ester of aromatic acid
1220 - 1080 i m aromatic fingerprint region j
749, 711, 699 j w - m
i
1681, 1312, i w
1029, 1022, j
824, 800 j
I
i
1
1
1
i
i
1
!
!
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
_
°™ER Sample predominantly alkylated esters of aromatic acids and alcohols.
8-130
-------
iABLt 8-139.
1R REPORT
HI«F. 3XiM-Cl, vapor above tar storage tank, canister- rinsp: r. rut *i j&
Hfire Number . i
.1. i Intensity j Assignment/Comments
(an )
J59, 2924 s aliphatic CH stretch
2856
5& m
ester or aliphatic ketone
1159 m aliphatic CH
1376 w methyl CH
1214 w
-ih 1123,
conjugated ester or ether C-0 or Si-C
•
w unassigned ; . .
1)68, 718, 671 j
i
' i
I
i
!
1 :.
i
r~ ': '
t . t
|
*
i
1
•
i
OTHtt REMARKS:
•Probable saturated hydrocarbons with trace of aromatic ether or ester of
aromatic acid.
8-133
-------
TABLE 8-140.
IR REPORT
3XR-LC2, vapor above tar storage tank, canister rinse:
LC cut #2 IR
Wt«t Number ,
* Intimity
(cm'1)
3600 - 3000
3048
2959, 2931,
2856
1719
1452, 1376
1260
1095, 1034
m(broad)
5
s
m
m
m
i
810 m
739 m
1630, 1239,
w
1164, 864 j
i
-."•••-• :-
1
•
i
Asstgnimnt/Comimnts
alcoholic or phenolic OH
aromatic CH
aliphatic CH
ketone, ester
aliphatic CH bend
ether, ester, alcohol, phenol
ether, alcohol, phenol, ester
of aromatic acid
monosubsti tuted benzene
it
unassigned
' . . I
,^
OTHER REMARKS:
Probable aliphatic esters of aromatic acids and alcohols.
8-134
-------
TABLE 8-141.
IR REPORT
3XR-LC3, vapor above tar storage tank, canister'rinse:
LC cut#3 IR
-------
SAMPut.
TABLE 8-142.
IR REPORT
3XR-LC4, vapor above tar storage tank, canister rinse: LC cut *4 IR
WmNwnbtr
| (on-1)
2959, 2932,
Intensity
Arognmtnt/Comflttflts
s aliphatic CH stretch
2856
1733 s ester or aliphatic ketone
1459, 1376
1287, 1123,
1075
739, 660
m,w
s,m,w
.
m
]
j
[
i
1
1
i
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic acid and/or
aryl and alkyl ethers
monosubsti tuted benzene
.
OTHER REMARKS;
•This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Spectrum strongly suggests that sample is predominantly benzoates of 1° and 2°
alcohols.
8-136
-------
TABLE 8-143.
IR REPORT
3XR-LC5, vapor above tar storage tank, canister rinse:
LC cut #5 IR
•m Number
(on'1)
2961, 2929,
2861
1733
1457
1376
1276, 1126
1075, 744
744, 701
1038
......
.-
1 "
•
Intensity
Q
s
m
w
m
w,m
m
w
-
Assignment/Comments
aliphatic CH
ester or aliphatic ketone
aliphatic CH bend
methyl CH bend
aliphatic ester of aromatic acid
substituted aromatic CH or ethyl C-C
substituted aromatic CH
unassigned
TREBBQtARKS:
-Sample predominantly aliphatic esters and/or sat. hydrocarbons but bands at
1075, 1038, 744, and 701 cm"1 suggest presence of same aromatic cmpds.
8-137
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-144.
IR REPORT
3XR-LC6, vapor above tar storage tank, canister rinse: LC cut #6 IR
Wivt Number
(em'1)
3215
Inttnsrty
W
3055 | w
2959, 2432,
j 2856
S
AsagniMnt/Commmts
alcoholic or phenolic OH
aromatic CH stretch
aliphatic CH stretch
11739
ester or aliphatic ketone
1602
1465, 1383
1267, 1
1178, 1143,
1130, 1025
746
1026, 965, 835,
j 761, 698
i
m
m
m
w
m
w
1
1
1
1
aromatic C^-^C
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic acid or
aliphatic or aromatic ethers
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
. t
!
OTHER REMARK*
"A slight amount of aromatic character.
8-138
-------
TABLE 8-145
!R REPORT
3XR-LC7, vapor above tar storage tank,
rinse: LC cut #7 IR
•
Mm Number
1 Intensity Assignment/Comments
(on"')
3600 - 3200 w(broad) j alcoholic or phenolic OH
1959, 2932, s aliphatic CH stretch
"1856
1740 s ester or aliphatic ketone
1459, 1376 m,w | aliphatic CH bend
1259, 1164, m
ester of aromatic acid, ether,
1075 1 alcohol , phenol
746 w
i
1671, 1602, w
1561, 1034,
671
. . .- f
,..,.
•• .
i
.
substituted aromatic CH bend
• • • ••
unassigned
•
•
mitt REMARKS:
"Probable alcohols and saturated esters.
8-139
-------
TABLE 8-146.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 4X-P, tar decanter vapor, XAD-2 resin: preliminary IR
J Wm Number
| (cm'1)
3068, 3056
Intensity
m
2966, 2931, w
2856
1671, 1958,
w
1924, 1842,
j 1787, 1739
1595, 1390
i
1273 - 1006
958
780, 739
2294, 1821,
1622, 828,
615
i
m
w
m
s,m
w
Assignment/Comments
aromatic or olefinic CH
aliphatic CH
aromatic combinations/overtones
aromatic or olefinic C-1-1-^, or
monosub. naphthalene
aromatic fingerprint region
aromatic or olefinic CH bend
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
!
I
-
_
OTHER REMARKS:
"Sample predominantly unsaturated and aromatic hydrocarbons. IR spectrum suggests
that aromatic hydrocarbons are predominantly a- and 8-substituted naphthalenes.
8-140
-------
TABLE 8-147.
!R REPORT
4X-R, tar decanter vapor, XAD-2 resin: concentrate IR
«m Number ) intensity i Assignment/Comments
(em"1) !
1088, 3071, j w,m,s,w aromatic or olefinic CH
3054, 3007 1
%7 - 2863 i w aliphatic CH
948- 1624 | w I aromatic overtones/combinations
595, 1387 m j condensed aromatic, a-sub. naphthyl ,
| or conj. vinyl CA1-^
1271 - 1010 w
958 1 m
aromatic fingerprint region
conj. olefinic or aromatic CH
J79, 739, 698 s,m,w 1 substituted aromatic cmpds.
290, 1508, w | unassigned
1427, 831, 61]
i
•
--
1
•
:
'Sample predominantly naphthalene, substituted aromatic cmpds, and unsaturated
hydrocarbons with some aliphatic groups present.
8-141
-------
TABLE 8-148.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 4X-LC1, tar decanter vapor, XAD-2 resin: 1C cut #1 IR
Wave Number
{em'1)
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
2959, 2930,
2859
1739
1005
1457, 1381
1686, 1645, 668
|
!
s
w
w
m,w
w
!
aliphatic CH stretch
~
ester or aliphatic ketone
aliphatic ester
aliphatic CH bend
.
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
"This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Sample predominantly saturated hydrocarbons with a trace of aliphatic ketones
and/or saturated esters.
8-142
-------
SAffU:
TABLE 8-149.
IR REPORT
4X-LC2, tar decanter vapor, XAD-2 resin:
LC cut
IR
•m Number
. ,\.
lew )
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
2959, 2930,
s
aliphatic CH stretch
2854 | | -.
1744
1603 -
w | ester
w
aromatic CA^
,1462, 1380 m,w aliphatic CH bend
1034
W
746 w
1675, 1151, w
816
aliphatic ester or ether
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
j
j
I
'
i
•
I
TNHI REMARKS:
'This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Sample predominantly aliphatic hydrocarbons, esters and/or ethers. Bands at 1603
tod 746 ori'l suggest aromatic cmpds are predominantly monosubstituted benzene.
8-143
-------
TABLE 8-150.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 4X-LC3, tar decanter vapor, XAD-2 resin: 1C cut £3 IR
Wive Number !
Jem'1)
Intimity
Asngnmtnt/Cemtmim
3072, 3052,
w
aromatic CH stretch
3030
2927, 2860
1449
1261 - 1040
886, 869
818
732
1398, 1301, 954
w
w
w
w
m
s
w
1 - -
I
-
aliphatic CH stretch
aliphatic CH bend
aromatic fingerprint region
substituted aromatic CH bend
substituted aromatic CH bend
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
-..•:.
- —
OTHER RBIARKS:
Sample predominantly aromatic hydrocarbons and alkylated derivatives; e.g..
a- and-B-substituted naphthalenes.
8-144
-------
TABLE 8-151.
IR REPORT
4X-LC4, tar decanter vapor, XAD-2 resin: LC cut
TR
Dm Number i .
i -1v i Intensity Assignment/Comments
ten ) i
:3ttl, 3395 m,w i 1° amine, pyrrole or indole N-H
12955,2921, s aliphatic CH stretch
! 2854 I
1723 w ketone or ester
1462, 1450, w,m,w aliphatic CH bend
1380
11263 w ester of aromatic acid
11098, 1086, | w aliphatic C-N, aromatic ester, , ., . ..,-.,-...,„..
1034
aromatic or aliphatic ethers
805,749, 725 w,m,s sub. aromatics CH bend '
i
1336, 1327, w
unassigned
1239, 1207
1
-
< ,_. •.-••.••-. •
« •-•- •"• - -
•
.
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by Fourier Transform IR
techniques.
Sample predominantly aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons with siome aromatic and
lliphatic esters and ethers and some 1° amino-cmpds or derivatives of pyrrole and/or
indole.
8-145
-------
TABLE 8-152.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 4X-LC5. tar decanter v^nnrr XAD-? rp«;in- ir rut .#z TD
Wtvt Number
ienf1)
2959, 2930,
2854
1728
1462, 1380
1280
1034, 740, 670
intimity
Assignment/ Comments
s aliphatic CH
w
w
w
ketone or ester
aliphatic CH
acetate, sat. ester
1
w
unas signed
,
1.
i j
•
OTHER RQUMRKS:
"This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Sample appears to contain only saturated hydrocarbons and saturated esters.
8-146
-------
TABLE 8-153.
1R REPORT
4X-LC6. tar d«»r.aptpr vapor. XAD-2
^ nit *fi Tp
Wive Number
fern'1)
2953, 2930,
2859
1720
1609
1462, 1374
1245, 1110
1028, 1010
752
j 1674, 1292
L..,.,,.
|
'
r
! intensity
i
s
m
m
)
j m,w
w
w
w
w
Assignment/Comments
aliphatic CH stretch
ketone or ester
aromatic or conj. olefinic CA1-^
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic acid, or aliphatic
and/or aromatic ethers
aromatic fingerprint region
sub. aromatic CH bend
unassigned
.
i
WEB REMARKS:
Sample predominantly aliphatic esters of aromatic acids; i.e., benzoates,
Phthalates, etc.
8-147
-------
TABLE 8-154.
tR REPORT
SAMPLE: 4X-7. tar decanter vapor. XAD-2 rpsin- tr n.t ±7 TR
Wm Number
(an'1)
2959, 2929,
2859
1744
1668, 1603,
1556
1462, 1380
1169, 1110
1075, 1034
722, 828
Inanity
S
m
m
m
w,m
w
w
I-
1415
•~-'V: >?•"<•• -.-•-• ' ' ' -- -
w
i
•
AJMsnmtnt/Commerm
aliphatic CH stretch
ester or aliphatic ketone
aromatic or olefinic C^-^C
aliphatic CH bend
aliphatic ester or ether
aromatic fingerprint
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
_
.. . —
OTHER REMARK*
' IR spectrum suggests that sample predominantly aromatic or aliphatic esters of
saturated carboxylic acids and aliphatic ethers.
8-148
-------
TABLE 8-155.
IR REPORT
4XR-P, tar decanter vapor, canister rinse:
fm Number
(on-1)
3058
2964 - 2852
1601
1495
1447
1265 - 1023
552-864
316
181
734
£39, 1689-2079
.
Intensity , Assignment/Comments
m aromatic CH stretch
w | aliphatic CH stretch
m conj. DBL-bond, nitroso, aromatic
m aromatic, nitroso
s aliphatic CH bend
m aromatic or vinyl ether, ketal or acetal ,
C-N stretching, C-0 stretching, alkane .
m epoxy, N-H bending
5 aromatic CH bend . • "••••:>
m aromatic CH bend
5 aromatic CH bend
w unassigned
.
|
•
i
miSR REMARKS: ,
'2340 & 2370 cm"1 due to C02.
Probable aromatic hydrocarbons and some aromatic ethers.
8-149
-------
TABLE 8-156.
1R REPORT
SAMPLE: 4XR-C, tar decanter vapor, canister rinse: concentrate IR
W**N«nb,r ^^
(ew }
i
Assign RMnt/C0i)inwiiti
3090, 3050 ! s(broad) | aromatic CH stretch
2980 - 2880 | w
aliphatic CH stretch
1950 - 1650 | w j aromatic overtones/combinations
J1595, 1509
1455
1390, 1360
1270 - 960
835 - 700
1425, 1320,
865
s ! aromatic C-^C stretch
w
w
s
s( broad)
W
!
aliphatic CH bend
gem-dimethyl CH bend
aromatic fingerprint region
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS: _j
Sample predominantly substituted hydrocarbons. Bands at 1390, 1360, 865 cm"
strongly suggest that sample contains significant amounts of a- and B- i-pr and t-bu
naphtha!enes.
8-150
-------
TABLE 8-157.
!R REPORT
4XR-LC1, tar decanter vapor, canister rinse: ic rut *i TR
i Intensity
leaf1)
12959, 2925, s
2856
;1733 w
1465 m
Assignment/Comments
aliphatic
CH
ester, or
aliphatic
;1376 w aliphatic
;1123 & 1068 w
|719 w
i
11274 w
i
aliphatic ketone
CH
CH
ester or aliphatic ether
-(CH?)~ rocking for >_ 4
unassigned
'Bands at 1733 cm"1 and 1123 and 1068 cm"1 suggests the presence of trace amounts
of esters. Sample predominantly saturated hydrocarbons.
8-151
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-158.
IR REPORT
4XR-LC2, tar decanter vapor, canister rinse:
1C cut f2 IR
Wm Number
(ml)
3071, 3053
2000 - 1600
1507
1392
1200 - 1000
intensity
m
w
m
m
m
957 . m
828
781
m
s
i
Assignment/Comments
aromatic or olefinic -CH
aromatic combinations/overtones
aromatic C-^^-C
a-naphthalenes C^^-C
aromatic fingerprint region
olefinic C-H (trans)
substituted aromatic hydrocarbons
substituted aromatic hydrocarbons
740 .. s | .substituted aromatic, hydrocarbons
"
1456, 1445,
1427, 1245,
699, 617
. . ..... ....
I
w
1
unassigned
OTHER REMARK*
' Sample contained virtually no aliphatic hydrocarbons, but appeared to consist
almost-entirely of aromatic hydrocarbons. Bands at 781 and 740 cm"1 highly suggestive
of a-naphthalenes, i.e., 3 adjacent hydrogens on a ring or monosubstituted benzene.
8-152
-------
TABLE 8-159.
IR REPORT
t. 4XR-U3, tar decanter vapor, canist.pr r-in«;p- LC 'cut #3 IR
tot Number
(em1)
W
3055
2966, 2925,
2856
1718
1152
1260 - 1027
801,746, 725,
698
m, 1335, 993
131, 890
i .;
1 - '
i
1
j ".
Intensity
1
m
w
I
w
s
w - m
i
m,s,s
w
-
Assignment/Comments
aliphatic 2° amine
aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
aliphatic CH stretch
ketone or ester
aliphatic CH bend
C-N stretching of aromatic and • .
al iphatic amine
substituted aromatic CH bend
i
unassigned
Sim REMARKS:
'This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques. . _0 . T. , . . .
The sample seemed to contain predominantly aliphatic 2 amines. The lack or^a
•ediun-to-strong band in the region 1650-1580 cnfl arising from 1 amine NH wagging
fypports the idea that aliphatic 2° amines are predominant. Strong bands in region
890-700 cnf* suggests appreciable amounts of aromatic hydrocarbons.
8-153
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-160.
IR REPORT
4XR-LC4, tar decanter vapor, canister rinse:
LC cut #4 IR
WVVB Nvtnbtr
leaf1)
2595, 2932,
2877, 2963
Inanity
m
733 | s
1459, 1383
1280, 1274
1123, 1075
73S
1041, 965, 831,
671
1
m
s
s
m
w
Assignimnt/Comintnts
aliphatic CH stretch
ester or aliphatic ketone
aliphatic CH bend
aromatic ether or ester of aromatic acid
aliphatic or aromatic ether or
ester of aromatic acid
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
i
•
1
• .
•
OTHER REMARKS:
"This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
3398 due to uneven sample.
671 & 739 may be due to MeC12.
Probable aliphatic esters of aromatic acids and alkylated aromatic hydrocarbons.
8-154
-------
TABLE 8-161.
!R REPORT
4XR-LC5, tar decanter vapor, canister rinse:
LC cut #5 IR
Rut Number !
.r Intensity Assignment/Comments
3078 w aromatic or olefinic CH
2963, 2933,
2878, 2866
S
aliphatic CH
<1732 ' s ester or aliphatic ketone
:1H8, 1581 w ; aromatic or olefinic C^-^C
ltt§, 1380 m,w
W
1126,1071
M, 701
Ifflfi, 956, 762,
! 653
:i -'fL. '
;
!
! ...
i .- •
i
1
S
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic acid or aromatic ether
s ester of aromatic acid, aliphatic
m,w
or aro'matic ether
substituted aromatic CH bend
w
•
unassigned
..._...
Sample predominantly aliphatic esters, ethers and/or saturated hydrocarbons, but
toes cpntain some aromatic compounds; possibly ester or aromatic acids.
8-155
-------
TABLE 8-162.
IR REPORT
4XR-LC6, tar decanter vapor, canister rinse, LC cut 16 IR
' ' B • I^^^^M^^^*
WWH nVInBvr
ta**1)
3062
2966, 2932,
2856
1740
1609, 1596
1465
Intwitv
W
s
s
m
m
1130, 1074, | w
1027
835 ! w
780, 753
3302, 1643,
1513
,-.•>"<--<•• -- ••-• , •-• - •
m
w
AoJpniMBt/CMiuMBts
aromatic or olefinic CH
aliphatic CH
ester, or aliphatic ketone
aromatic or olefinic C*C stretch
aliphatic CH bend or aromatic G^C stretch
aromatic Cr^C stretch, aliphatic ether- or ester
-(CH2)4 rocking or substituted aromatic
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
I
! 1 J
!
!
OTHER RBURKS: ,
" - Splitting pattern about 750 cm suggests monosubstituted aromatic compounds
are predominant.
- Carbonyl group most likely a keto group due to absence of strong absorption
bands § 1300-1050 cm~l which accompany an ester.
Sample predominantly aliphatic ketones and alkylated aromatic hydrocarbons.
8-156
-------
TABLE 8-163.
IR REPORT
4XR-LC7, tar decanter vapor, canister rinse: LC cut #7 IR
i 1 n tensity i Assignment/Comments
fa-") i
: t
076 w aromatic CH
m, 2932,
2856
1240
s aliphatic CH
s j ester or aliphatic ketone
2082, 1002 w cyanide
1465,1376 ! w aliphatic CH bend
1247, 1239 s | ester of aromatic acid, or aromatic ether
1212, 1123, m ester of aromatic acid, or aromatic or
1826
746, 615 w
1582, 1438,
w
1881, 965, 83$,
780, 698
I
,•>• -.
i
i
-
aliphatic ether
substituted aromatic CH bend
• •
unassigned ... . ..-• .-.' •
•
ffltlRBIMUCS:
746, 615, 698 possibly due to MeCU.
Sample predominantly aliphatic esters of aromatic acids.
8-157
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-164.
IR REPORT
11A-P, tar decanter vapor, condensate extract pH 2:
preliminary IR
""•"T*" ! iMMfer
<«M |
3300
- 2500 | ,. m
i
3058
i m
AssigniMat/CammOTU
broad 0-H stretch of carboxylic acid,
alcohol or phenol
aromatic CH stretch
J2924, 2856
w
aliphatic CH stretch
11691
m
(1594, 1502 i m
!1453, 1380
w
j!246 | m
!886, 813, 782, w - s - w
740, 691
i
1929, 953, 867
1
w
carboxylic acid dimer-asytn. -CO-0 stretch,
4 aroma ti c or conj . aci d
aromatic or olefinic C^^C
aliphatic CH bend
C-0 stretch of carboxylic acid or phenol
substituted aromatic compounds
i
unas signed
i
" • " - • - - .
!
! .....
'
•
••
-1
OTHfEff REMARKS:
. 1191 - 1039 on"1 aromatic fingerprint region.
Sample predominantly aromatic acids and phenolic derivatives.
8-158
-------
TABLE 8-165.
1R REPORT
SAMPLE:
11A-C. tar decanter vapor, condensate extract oH 2: concentrate IR
*m Number
ta-4>
3590, 3475
3500 - 2800
3060 - 3040, 300
2975, 2960,
2880
1620, 1595,
1510, 1500
1455, 1375
1285-1200
1150
830- 750
1C 1345,
Pts&fco. •
m* ioop»
^l"1 r
Intensity
S
(2 broad bands)
5 m,s
m
m,s
s,w
m - w
s
broad
w
'
.
•
Assignment/Comnwnts
alcoholic or phenolic free OH
alcoholic or phenolic OH H-bonded
aromatic or conj. olefinic CH stretch
aliphatic CH stretch
aromatic C-^-^^-C
•
aliphatic CH bend
aromatic fingerprint region
alcoholic or phenolic C-0 ' •-''•-.
alcoholic or phenolic OH bend, substituted** '••
aromatic CH bend "1
unassigned
( . ; . : . .
i
. Saaple appears-to contain predominantly alcohols and alkylated phenols. Broad,
wwesolved band at 1595 cm'l strongly suggest that considerable phenolic compounds
are present.
8-159
-------
TABLE 8-166.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 31A-IC1, tar decanter vapor, condensate extract pH 2: 1C cut 31 IR
WmMombtt
leaf1)
2959
2925, 2856
1465
1376, 1274
1
iBtwnty
S
s
ra
w
i
i
•
AuiyRRiHit/CofniMBts \
aliphatic CH stretch
aliphatic CH stretch
aliphatic CH bend . . ,
*
unas signed
•
'
1
i
i
|. -;,.-. -
..
I
1
1
-
i
i
_r
OTHER REMARKS: .1
2340 and 2370 cm L due to
Only saturated hydrocarbons
8-160
-------
TABLE 8-167.
IR REPORT
tar decanter vapor, condensate extract oH 2: 1C cut 32 IR
Wmtluinbtr i . . . ,„
.; , IflttnatY Assignment/Comnwntt
i (en ')
(3044 | w i aromatic CH stretch
(2960 - 2900 i w
aliphatic CH stretch
ilBK | w 1 aromatic C-1-1^
11445 w i aliphatic CH bend
;J15, 732 s substituted aromatic CH bend
11623, 1026, 95lL w
unassigned
i 890, 712 i ...... .-. ...
I }
,,,--...
••• • -- < • .
i - • .. • , \ ' • •..•.''.'..'.'- i
-.-.'' . ".'"•. •"-.-".••.- - -• ""-. -"; -1
•
i
•
San^le predominantly aromatic.
8-161
-------
TABLE 8-168.
IR REPORT
11A-LC3. tar decanter vapor, condensate extract pH 2:
1C cut »3 IR
Wm Umber | i__a.«
1 « inttnsrry
13048 j w
2952 - 2850 j w
1925 - 1602 j w
i 1445 j m
1246 - 951 J w
AnqamMt/Commtiits .
aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
aliphatic CH stretch
aromatic combination/overtone
aromatic or olefinic
fingerprint region-aromatic
814, 732 ! s j substituted aromatic C-H bend
i
1396, 1301, 883, w
869, 712, 6981
unassigned . ;-
i
I
1
*
i
I
i
i
i
i i
!
i
!
1
1 , !
!
,.. -., '
1
!
i
• - .'.'I I
1
i
1
f
i
OTHER
•Sample contained only traces of saturated hydrocarbons - almost entirely aromatic
and/or unsaturated hydrocarbons.
8-162
-------
TABLE 8-169.
IR REPORT
UA-LC4, tar decanter vapor, condensate extract oH 2:
LC cut #4 IR
•m Inter
to'1)
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
JL
»F
S^2854
alcoholic or phenolic OH, H-bonded
w
aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
m
aliphatic CH stretch
U03
w
| ketone, ester
3,1497
m,w
I aromatic
IttO
aliphatic CH bend
'139, 1886,
m,w,m
alcohol, phenol, ester or aromatic acid-
1010
J2.775, 746, j m,s,s,s,w
substituted aromatic CH
722, 698
1856,1627,
unassigned
1339, 1263,
1203,928
contains predominantly phenolic compounds, and some aliphatic esters of
•••.•*Ms*sainpie possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 Cr1tejia.fjr
KiMlysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
^techniques.
8-163
-------
TABLE 8-170.
IR REPORT
11A-LC5. tar decanter vapor, condensate extract pH 2: LC cut
TP
Wt**Ml?nbtr ! Inanity
(HIT1) i
B425 1 s
|3055 ! w
12959, 2931, i s
2863 i
J1726 | s
1452 | s
1
AsBgnmMt/Commmts
phenolic or alcoholic OH
aromatic or olefinic CH
aliphatic CH
ketone or ester
aliphatic CH bend
!l280, 1133 j s,m j phenol, alcohol, ester or ether
11075, 1006 ! m phenol, alcohol, ester or ether
746, 725 s
substituted aromatic CH (suggestive of
1 | monosubstituted benzene-phenol?)
{
t
!
i
-<-.:-. ,
1-
J
•'. - ..- -.-••• '
. . -
i
•
•
'• -
j
OTHER REMARKS:
• Probable alky!a'ted phenols, diaphatic esters of aromatic acids, ethers, alcohols.
8-164
-------
TABLE 8-171.
ID OCOOPT
11A-LC6, tar decanter vapor, condensate extract pH 2: LC cut #6 IR
fm Number
ion'1)
13300 - 2500
;2959, 2931,
i 2863
ilS96f 1506
11465, 1376
m
1246
m - 1200
81 - 807
i
1824, 1623,
1314, 951,
931, 623
i , '
L
'•f"~ .'•
;
.' .•*! • •*-• .
1
• Prohahl-p a
Intensity
S
S
S
s,m
m
s
w - m
m - s
w
•
.
.
llrvlatpd ohenols.
Assignment/Comments
carboxylic acid or phenolic derivatives |
aliphatic CH stretch 1
C-L^-:-C ring stretches
aliphatic CH bend
phenolic OH bend
phenolic C-0 stretch • |
aromatic fingerprint region
substituted aromatic CH
unassigned }
-
8-165
-------
SAMP1E:
TABLE 8-172.
IR REPORT
11A-LC7, tar decanter vapor, condensate extract nH ?: !C rut *7 TP
Wtvt Nwnbtr
leaf1)
1956, 2929,
2856
2064
Intimity
i
AsugnraMt/CofnfMftR
s aliphatic CH stretch
m
1731, 1711 S
1597, 1484
s,ro
1465 m
i
1278 s
1125, 1072 | w
746
m
1551, 1451
w
i
!
isothiocyanate
ketone , ester
aromatic or conj. olefinic C-^^C
aliphatic CH bend
ester, ether •
ester, ether ...J
alkene, substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
i
.
1 ' i
I ,"•-•••--"•
1
1
•
•
•
i
i
•-
J
OTHER ROIARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by Level 1 criteria for IR -
analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Probable aliphatic esters of aromatic acids.
8-166
-------
TABLE 8-173.
IR REPORT
11B-P, tar decanter vapor, condensate extract pH 12:
preliminary IR
fm Number
to.'1)
3500 - 3200
354,. 2930,
2859
!7C, 1732
m
W, 1380
m - 1074
J9, 740
.
i:, -
'- -\
.1
:i ' -.
Ci
L _ . •
r™ .,,. .
s
'
i
Intensity
w(broad)
s
m ;
w
m,w
w
w
-
Assignment/Comments
amine or amide NH, H-bonded
aliphatic CH stretch !
ester, or possibly aliphatic ketone
amide I band of 1° amides, ketone, ester
aliphatic CH bend
ami no C-N stretch, esters of aromatic acids,
aromatic and/or aliphatic ethers
amine or amide NH bend, sub. aromatic NH bend j
i
i
•'•''., •''••'
.\ .
•
•
'•'-•
MBtBIAftKS:
•:Sanple-predominantly aliphatic ketones, and aryl alkyl amines and/or amides. May
some esters of aromatic acids.
8-167
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-174.
IR REPORT
11B-C, tar decanter vapor, condensate extract nH 12: rnnremtratP TP
Wiw Nwniwf
to-1)
3545, 3585
3500 - 3100
3050-3030, 3006
|2980, 2920,
inttnsfty
s,w
Agqnmtirt/Comiiiirm
alcoholic OH stretch
s-*m( broad)) amines or amides NH stretch
s
m,m,w
aromatic CH stretch
aliphatic CH stretch
2865 j
J2064
1720
1660, 1620,
m
m
s
1590, 1580 |
1455, 1375
1410
s,w
isothiocyanate (-N-OS)
aliphatic ketones or esters
1° amines, amide I (-OO) and amide II
(NH bend) bands, or aromatic O^
aliphatic CH bend
m 1° amide C-N stretch
1265, 1255, ra,m,s-*m
j 1155 - 1090
830 - 730 m
2560,2400, j w
1500, 1480,
1010, 840
esters of aromatic acids, C-N stretch of 1°, 2°,
and/or 3° amines and 2U amides or alcoholic C-0
amines and 1° amide NH wag or substituted aromatic
CK bend
unas signed
t
t
.1 " - '
'
-
OTHER REMARKS:
.Sample appears -to contain predominantly aryl and alkyl amines or amides. The
broad unresolved peak about 1600 cm'1 is typical of monosubstituted benzene, suggest-
ing the presence of aniline and N-alkylated derivatives.
8-168
-------
TABLE 8-175.
IR REPORT
11B-LC1. tar decanter vapor, rnndppsa+p oytrsrt pM 19- ir rut in TP
fa.'1)
Intensity
AssignRMnt/Comirnnts
S59 i s • aliphatic CH stretch
0; 2856 | s aliphatic CH stretch
!Ǥ | m
aliphatic CH bend
i '
IIS, 1376, 1 w unassigned
IS? j
i •
|
i
i . . .-
I
i ' -"• " •' -••
i , i i ' •" "
' . 1
! . !
: !
i
r I
' '' i
|
1
i
' i
1
ABRBIMKS:
-2340 and 2370 cm"1 due to
Only saturated hydrocarbons present.
8-169
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-176.
1R REPORT
11B-LC2. tar decanter vapor, condensate extract pH 12:
Wm Nwnfaer
j Intmnty
*»• i |
1 :
3053 w
i
Asstffftmm/Cammtnts
aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
2951, 2931, m,s,m aliphatic CH stretch
2846
1570, 1472 w,m
1450 m
872 w
810, 739, 692 i m.s.s
!
1014 ; W
i
i
aromatic C-^^C
aliphatic CH bend
isolated aromatic CH bend
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
f
1
t \
\ \
i
j
I
1
1
| I
1
! . •
i
i
OTHER REMARKS:
.This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria fo^
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Sample contained saturated and unsaturated or aromatic hydrocarbons.
8-170
-------
TABLE 8-177.
IR REPORT
11B-LC3, tar decanter vaoor, condensate extract oH 12:
1C cut *3 IR
Van Number
ien'1)
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
I3056, 3044,
w
aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
i 3017
12950, 2923,
! aliphatic CH stretch
2855
11730
m
aliphatic ketone or ester
11600, 1583,
i 1492, 1477
11462, 1459,
< 1442
'1374, 1365
11263, 1092,
i 1064, 1025
w,w,w,m
m
w
m - s
aromatic C1-^ stretch
•
aliphatic CH bend
methyl CH bend, possibly gem-dimethyl
ester of aromatic acid or aromatic
or aliphatic ether
813, 799,
m,s,m,s
substituted aromatic isolated H
778, 737
substituted aromatic CH bend
699
w
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
•This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IRanalysisf? spSSS of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform IR
^Sample appears to contain predominantly aromatic compounds and ester of aromatic
ttids or aryl ethers.
8-171
-------
TABLE 8-178.
IR REPORT
SAMPL6- HB-LC4, tar decanter vapor, condensate.extract pH 12:
1C cut
IR
(en ')
Assqamtnt/Commmts
13411
2° amine or amide NH stretch
13062
w
aromatic CH stretch
12959, 2931,
aliphatic CH stretch
2856
1718
691
m
m
ketone, formate or conjugated ester or amide
j 1459
11280,
' 1095 ,
i739
j
1239
1013 i
!
m
m
m
s
aliphatic CH or amide C-N !
amide or aryl alkyl ether
ester, ether
substituted benzene
substituted benzene
11342, 1123,
unassigned
1075, 808
OTHER REMARKS:
- IR spectrum suggests sample contains appreciable amounts of aromatic and ali
2° amines. Lack of strong absorption at 1718 cm"1 suggests that absorption at 3411 cm
due to" 2° amine not amide.
8-172
-------
UtflL
TABLE 8-179.
1R REPORT
11B-LC5, tar decanter vapor, condensate extract.pH 12:
LC cut #5 IR
•m Number :
Ian'1) |
3391 i
3055 i
2959, 2911, !
2863 i
1726 :
1602, 1581 !
1465, 1388 i
1280, 1123 i
1075, 952 i
734, 691 v i
i
f
1581 (probably j
:IMi bending),j
ifio," 1239, |
Intensity Asasoment/Commtnts
m 2° amine or 2° amide
w aromatic or olefinic CH
s aliphatic CH
s ketone or ester
w aromatic C^-C
m,w aliphatic CH, methyl CH bend
s,m ! aliphatic ester of aromatic acid
m,w | aromatic fingerprint region
s,w j substituted benzene, probably
1 ortho-di substituted
I
w | unassigned
t
I -
j
,-Carboryl absorption too high for amide, and lack of doublet in region 3400-3100
•" leads to conclusion that compounds are secondary amino derivatives. Sample con-
tains aryl and alky! 2° amines and aryl and/or alkyl esters.
8-173
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-180.
IR REPORT
11B-LC6. tar decanter vapor, condensate extract oH 12: 1C cut -»6. TR
WmNomiw
{an'1)
3329
3150, 3068
2954, 2931,
2863
2068
Intnsity i AwgnrnMt/Camirams
m(broad) i alcoholic OH or amide or amine NH
s | aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
s
w
1725 m
1610, 1595, s
1506
1459, 1390
s,m
aliphatic CH stretch
isothiocyanate or ketenimine
ester and/or aliphatic ketone
aromatic C-1-1-^ and/or amine or amide NH-bend
. aliphatic CH bend
1287 - 1246 s ester of aromatic acid, aryl ether of C-N
i
stretch of aryl or alky! amines
944, 849, 807 -t w,w,m sharp bands in aromatic fingerprint region,
691
substituted aromatic CH bend
I
i
2733, 2698,
2575, 1321
,- .- •;.. -
w unassigned
i
.
1
1
i
t
i
.
i
• - .
i
•
_
OTHER REMARKS:
•Sample predominantly alkylated derivatives of aniline or polynuclear aromatic
amine, and saturated ketones. The lack of a broad band in region 1250-100 cm"-1 cor-
responding to an ethereal or alcoholic C-0 stretch suggests that the sharp, strong
band in this region is likely due to C-N stretch of amines.
8-174
-------
TABLE 8-181.
IR REPORT
11B-LC7, tar decanter- vaporL GjFido'ftsate extract oK 12: 1C cut ^7 TR
Wavf Number
(cm'1)
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
2954, 2931,
aliphatic CH stretch
2856
2061
1732
1465
! m
i s
1 rn
i isothiocyanate or ketenimine
i ester or aliphatic ketone
i a'liphatic CH bend
1240
ester of aromatic acid, aromatic ether
i!122, 1074
w
ether, ester of aromatic acid
?39
m
aromatic
1664, 1602,
w
unassigned
1581, 1383,
759, 691
WES REMARKS:
•Probable aliphatic esters of aromatic acids.
-------
TABLE 8-182.
1R REPORT
SAMPLE:
<-P. vapor above chemical oil tank, XAD-2 resin
Wm Hurnbtr
(em'1)
3069, 3055,
Intimity : Atavammt/Coinmtim
w,m,w
3007
2959, 2932,
aromatic CH stretch
w aliphatic CH stretch
2856
1950, 1924,
1842, 1732
1596, 1506
1390, 1363
1274, 1173,
i 1123
w
m
m
*
aromatic combinations/overtones
aromatic C-1-1-1^
highly sub. aromatic or gem-dimethyl CH bend
aromatic or aliphatic ethers
i
958 ; m
841, 780, 648
i
1671, 1568,
1 1246, 1006,
616
[•-• •
w.s.w
substituted aromatic CH bend
1
w
\
unassigned
;
i
1 ! .
i
'
1 J
..
OTHER REMARKS:
. Sample appears-to contain predominant aromatic hydrocarbons and methylated and/or
other derivatives.
8-176
-------
TABLE 8-183.
1R REPORT
StfPlfc 5X-C, vapor above chemical oil tank. XAD-2 resin: concentrate IR
•M Number
(en*1)
Intensity
Assignment/Comiwnts
3068, 3051,
w,m,w
aromatic or olefinic CH
3004
• 2850
w
aliphatic CH stretch
1557 - 1671
w
aromatic overtones/combinations
1596, 1508
m,w
aromatic C-L-L-:-C
1392
m
j highly substituted aromatics
,780, 746
,m,m
substituted aromatic cmpds
298, 1270,
w
unassigned
1124, 1008,
8*5, 816
.Sample comprised almost entirely of aromatic hydrocarbons with very few saturated
cmpds present.
8-177
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-184.
IR REPORT
5X-LC1, vapor above chemical oil tank, XAD-2 resin:
LC cut <1 IR
WM Number
(em*1)
inuouty
AwviiMRt/Commtnts
! 2960, 2926,
I aliphatic C-H stretch
2858
i 1462
m
aliphatic CH bend
i 1377
w
isolated methyl CH bend
: 1746, 1604
w
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample contains predominantly saturated hydrocarbons.
8-178
-------
TABLE 8-185.
IR REPORT
5X-LC2, vapor above chemical oil tank, XAD-2 resin: LC cut w2 IR
Im Number
(an'1)
2359,2926,
2856
\m, 1452
1380
1262
1386, 1040
302
13,750, 701
..$>;"••
k- *..••-•'•
intensity Assignment/Comments
m.s.m 1 aliphatic CH stretch
w l aliphatic CH bend
w ; methyl CH bend
s ! aromatic ether
s I aromatic and/or aliphatic ether
s i substituted aromatic CH bend
w i unassigned
1 . •
l
'
i
i
i ' .-.•-..
! ' ' '
!
!
i
i
•
i
, -This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
^analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
^techniques.
Sonple predominantly aliphatic and aromatic ethers. Absorption bands In CH
M-of-piane bending region for aromatics suggests that para-substituted benzene is
!*Awinant but some monosub. benzene is present.
8-179
-------
TABLE 8-186.
1R REPORT
5X"LC3' vapor above chemical oil tank, XAD-2 resin:
1C cut
IR
t
Wm Umber
, (««'11
1
Intnsity • Aw»nim«t/C«mmtim
i
2965, 2930, s aliphatic CH stretch
, 2859
11738
'1462, 1380
w ester or aliphatic ketone
m,w aliphatic CH bend
, 1263 s aromatic ether or ester of aromatic acid
[1098, 1039
J869, 805, 699
j
i
s aromatic and/or aliphatic ethers or alkanes
w,s,w substituted aromatic
1656, 670 w unas signed
"1
i
!
!
i
1 :,-.:,= •••• • •
!
1
i
I
i
!
1
"
OTHER REMARKS:
•Sample seems to consist primarily of vinyl or aromatic ethers, and a small amount
of aromatic or aliphatic esters.
8-180
-------
TABLE 8-187.
IR REPORT
5X-LC4, vapor above chemical oil tank. XAD-2 resin: 1C cut e& IR
Km Number
ten'1)
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
2960, 2920,
aliphatic CH stretch
1706
w
ketone or ester
1593
w
aromatic C-r-1-;-l
.460, 1375
w
liphatic CH bend
1020
w
aliphatic ester or ether
•26
w
substituted aromatic CH bend
•This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
^analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
S techniques.
Sample appears to contain predominantly saturated hydrocarbons and a trace amount
compounds.
8-181
-------
TABLE 8-188.
1R REPORT
SAMPLE: -5X-LC5. vapor above chemical oil tank. yAn.?
TP
*
2959, 2924, j s
2859 i
1 1726 | m
i 146a, 1450 j m,w
1380 j w
aliphatic CH
Angnimfit/Cwnmtins
stretch
ketone or ester
aliphatic CH
bend
isolated methyl CH bend . ... • -..-;...
1286, 1130 j m,w. j aliphatic or
740 i w
!
,1661, 1632, | w
substituted
aromatic ester or ether
aromatic CH bend
unas signed
1603, 1074
OTMiR REMARKS:
. Sample predominantly saturated hydrocarbons and aliphatic esters. Bands in
region 1660-1600 and at 1074 and 740 on - suggest presence of aromatic cmpds, possibly
alkylated derivatives or aromatic esters.
8-182
-------
TABLE 8-189.
1R REPORT
5X-LC6, vaoor above chemical oil tank. XAD-2 >-gsin: in rut ^6 TR
•we Number
(on-"1!
intensity
Assignment/Comments
3063
aromatic or olefinic CH
;2956, 2927,
aliphatic CH stretch
2856
1727
1603, 1460
i454, 1380
m
m,w
ketone or ester
aromatic
aliphatic CH bend
1280, 1125
m,w
ester of aromatic acid or aromatic
and/or aliphatic ether
W. 694
m,w
substituted aromatic CH bend
15, 1040, 618
w
unassigned
net REMARKS:
Snplfpredominantly aromatic esters of 1° alcohols (I.e., benzoates, etc.)
8-183
-------
TABLE 8-190.
IR REPORT
5X-LC7, vapor above chemical oil tank, XAD-2 resin:
LC. cut
IR
Wm Natter j
(cm'1) j
'
2964, 2962, j
IntMHty i
S
AvifnuMflt/ContflMRts i
aliphatic CH stretch
2859 i
, 1738 1
! 1562 i
! 1456 !
1286, 1268, |
m ester or aliphatic ketone j
m
aromatic C^-^t stretch
m aliphatic CH bend
w
! 1122 i
1 !
i740
w
esters of aromatic acids or aromatic
or aliphatic ethars
substituted aromatic CH bend
i i 1
J1074, 669
1
w unassigned
.1
i
i
i
!
1
i
{
j
i
! f
!
i
!
- -- -.
1
1
OTHER REMARKS:
•This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Sample predominantly saturated ethers or saturated ethers and/or esters of
aromatic acids.
8-184
-------
TABLE 8-191.
1R REPORT
5XR-P, vapor above chemical oil tank, canister rinse- Preliminary IB_
MM Number i
1 ! Intensity : Assignment/Comments
Ian1)
J585, 3045, 30ld s aromatic CH stretch
960,2950, 2920 w • aliphatic CH stretch
jfiO-1650 w aromatic overtones and combinations
35, 1500 s aliphatic G^-C stretch
$0, 1360 I s,w 1 gem-dimethyl CH bend or highly substituted aromatic
1
cmpds.
§0-960 s (sharp) aromatic fingerprint region
i-770 i m (broad)) substituted aromatic CH bend
* w
ft i w
i ; , -
• .,*•
•
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassiqned
• ••
NttMKt: .}
I Swple predominantly aromatic hydrocarbons. Bands at 1390, 1360 and 840-770 cm
^ly suggest that alkylated derivatives are i-propyl or t-butyl o- and e-substituted
TOalenes.
8-185
-------
TABLE 8-192.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 5XR-C, Vdpor above Chemical Oil tank.
rin«;p- fnnrgntrato TP
Wm Number
(em-1)
intuuity
AfHvmmnt/Cmimwm
J3090, 3060-3000
aromatic CH stretch
12980, 2960, 2870)
m,w
aliphatic CH stretch
1945-1665
m
aromatic overtones/combinations
11598, 1555, 1500
s,w,s
aromatic
stretch
11450
w
aliphatic CH bend
1390, 1360
gem-dimethyl or t-butyl CH
J1270-960
s (sharp]) aromatic fingerprint region
825, 720
s,m
sub. aromatic CH bend
12290
w
unassigned - (m'trile?)
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample contains primarily.aromatic hydrocarbons and alkylated derivates. Bands
at 1390, 1360, 825 and 720 on strongly suggest that these alkylated derivatives are
almost entirely i-propyl or t-butyl derivatives of a- and 6-sub. naphthalenes.
8-186
-------
TABLE 8-193.
1R REPORT
5XR-LC1, vapor above chemical oil tank, canister rinse: LC rut. 41 TP
huNnmber , . .
.1 Intensity Assignment/Comments
KB )
§,2925, 285fc s aliphatic CH
pB m ester or aliphatic ketone
f m aliphatic CH
j3l w methyl C-H
J3, 1075 w ester or ether C-0
j
w
-(CH,,) -, n>4 rocking or substituted aromatic
1, 1280, 127fl CH bend .: ;••-• •
!8,1280, 1274 w unassigned
I
i
i
•
IBIBURKS:
i Bands at 1733, 1123 and 1075 cm"1 very likely due to esters that are present.
feat 1280, 1274 and 739 cm"1 possible due to aromatic ether. Sample appears to
*ist predominantly of saturated hydrocarbons and/or aliphatic esters or ketones.
8-187
-------
TABLE 8-194.
!R REPORT
SAMPLE: 5XR-LC2. vapor above chemical oil tank, canister rins^r ir rut. M? TP
Wivi MvfltDCf
<«m'1)
;
3050
IntSBUty i
^^^i
AiUQQmtot/Dofnnwnts
w aromatic CH stretch
1956-1785 | w j aromatic combination and overtone region
1593, 1505
w
842 j w
aromatic Z^-C stretch
substituted aromatic CH bend
780 S w (substituted aromatic CH bend
1391, 1272, 12l6,
1127, 1008, w
961 m
t
unassiqned
unassigned
i
.
1
•
_
OTHER REMARKS:
Bands in region 1956-1785 on and single-bands at 842 and 780 cm highly
suggestive of meta- or ortho-disubstituted benzene, i.e., 3 or 4 adjacent
hydrogen atoms. Sample is primarily aromatic hydrocarbons, containing few
aliphatic hydrocarbons. This sample probably contains significant amounts of
naphthalene.
8-188
-------
TABLE 8-195.
IR REPORT
I SXSULC3. VapQf a.bBVe ehgrnlcel 6,11 tank. .canister Hnse: LC Cut *3 TR
tan Number ,
.•j Intensity
(en ! j
Assignment/Comments
89,2952, 2856 s aliphatic CH stretch
IS i s
esters or aliphatic ketones
i®, 1376 m,w aliphatic CH bend
M, 1123, 1075 m,w,w aromatic ester of 1° and 2° alcohols or aromatic or
al iphatic ethers
»,746 i w
is- . i
1
substituted aromatic CH bend
Mir 1034. w junassigned
i
-.
i
'
1
)
I
•
'
KRKBIARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
3 analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
^techniques. 0 .. _0 n u i
This sample appears to be predominantly aromatic esters of 1 and/or Z alconois.
-------
TABLE 8-196.
SAMPLE: 5XR-LC4, vapor above chemical oil tank, canister Hns»;
TR
Wive Namber
(cm'1)
Intimity
Asngnownt/ComfMim
2962, 2931, 287^, 1
2861
1733
(1462, 1381
1292, 1273
1122, 1071
744, 700
s aliphatic CH stretch
s
m
s
m
m,w
1945, 669 w
I
i
...... ....
i
.
.
* • '
-
ester or aliphatic ketone
aliphatic CH bend
aromatic ether or ester of aromatic acid
aromatic or aliphatic ether or ester of aromatic
acid
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
!
OTHER REMARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria for
IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier Transform
IR techniques.
Sample appeared to contain predominantly saturated hydrocarbons and aliphatic
es-ters of aromatic acids.
8-190
-------
TABLE 8-197.
IR REPORT
Im Number
i
Intensity Assignment/Comments
"SB, 2931, i
2878
m
jMB, 1456
:!377
s | aliphatic CH
s ester or aliphatic ke-tone
m aliphatic CH bend
w j irethyl CH bend
128D,, 1123 s,m aromatic or aliphatic esters or ethers
m
!«, 700
m
ester or ether • _._
m,w • " -('CH>,)n-, n*4-rbtki-n-g or subs-tl'tfltfrd aromStic'CH btftijl
i
WO, 1224,
1038
I
w unassigned
i -. . .
*"*-•-'•* .1
-
i , • .
• . • . - . ••".'. .....
i
I
•
'
i
Sample predominantly aliphatic esters of aromatic and aliphatic acids or
ethers.
8-191
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-198.
1R REPORT
5XR-LC6, vapor above chemical oil tank, canister rinse: 1C cut *6 IR
Wm Number
(em'1)
IntMUty
AtsifaaMot/Dammtfm
3335
m (broad) i alcoholic or phenolic OH or amide
3068
w
aromatic CH stretch
2959, 2931,
2856
aliphatic CH stretch
1732
ester or aliphatic ketone
1684
1383. 1273
m
m
ketone or amide
i 1602 m
1 1465 i m
aromatic C
i aliphatic
:^^C stretch
CH bend
I alcohol, phenol or aromatic ether or amide CN stretch
746
substituted aromatic CH bend
OTHER REMARKS:
• Sample consists predominantly of aliphatic alcohols, amides or esters or
alkylated derivatives of phenol.
8-192
-------
UffU:
TABLE 8-199.
1R REPORT
e. 5XR-LC7, vapor above chemical oil tank, canister rinse:
LC cut .£7 IR
Wnc Number
(cm'1)
2959, 2932,
: 2856
i 1739
: 1459
Intensrtv
c
S
m
Assignment/Comments
aliphatic CH stretch
ester or aliphatic
aliphatic
: 1264, 1164, , I
l 1075
w ester or ether
1678, 1602,
1561, 1376,
' '
; 821, 739, 698| w unassigned
' ' i
*
- -^. -..=-. , • '
}-,,
j
(
i
i
j
' ' • " - - - .""-'.• ""-" ". -."•".-•---•""
• i
-
- i
!
TttlWMARKS:
8-193
-------
TABLE 8-200.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 7X-P. upwind, ambient. XAD-2 resin: preliminary IR
Wm Number
-------
TABLE 8-201.
IR REPORT
. 7X-C, upwind ambient, XAD-2 resin: concentrate IR
IM Number
« miensrry <
(an )
3065, 3032
2966, 2928,
2873, 2862
1727
w
s
assignment/ uommeim
aromatic or olefim'c CH stretch
aliphatic CH stretch
m saturated ketone or ester
1705 m
1607, 1492 m
1153, 1376 m
1261, 1113
Bt;?57, 708,
m
1316, 1179,
1097, 1069,
1026
iiE» .,•••;.-. . —
i
I .
\
1
*.* • "•
m,w
m
w
•
dry! ketone or ester
aromatic C-^-^ stretch
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic acid, aromatic or aliphatic ether
substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
UBKHARKS:
Swple contains predominantly alkylated aromatic esters (e.g. benzoates),
;%ated and aromatic hydrocarbons and possibly some saturated ketones and/or
!«ters. .
8-195
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-202.
!R REPORT
7X-LC1. upwind ambient. XAD-2 resin: 1C cut C
IR
(cm'1)
Inanity
Anignnwnt/Commtnts
2959, 2924,
2856
aliphatic CH stretch
1458
m
aliphatic CH bend
1376
w
isolated methyl CH bend
752, 698
w
mono-substi tuted benzene
1746, 1610
| unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly saturated hydrocarbons.
However, bend @ 1746 suggests
presence of,small amounts of aliphatic ketones or esters, and bends at 1610, 752
and 698 on suggest presence of small amounts of substituted benzene.
8-196
-------
TABLE 8-203,
IR RiPQRT
7X-LC2, upwind ambient, XAD-2 fesin: 1C., cut #2 JR
fm Number
Intensity
Assignment/Comments
3065, 3030
m
i aromatic or olefinic CH
2965. 2924,
2871
aliphatic CH stretch
1601. 1492
w,m
aromatic
1456
m
aliphatic CH bend
1374
isolated methyl CH bend
752.699
m,s
substituted aromatic CH bend
1515, 1263,
1029, 887,
834
w
unassigned
Bands in C-H out-of-plane bending region for aroroatics. Characteristic of
•onorsubstituted benzene.
Sample contains only aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons.
-------
TABLE 8-204.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE-. 7X-LC3, upwind ambient, XAD-2 resin: 1C cut £3 IR
Wm Number
Intimity
Assiffnnwnt/Conuntnts
3084. 3062.
3026, 3001
aromatic or oTefinic CH
2965, 2925,
2871, 2856
aliphatic CH stretch
1591, 1515
w
aromatic C-^^-C ring mode
1494, 1453
aliphatic CH bend
i 1374
w
isolated methyl CH bend
890, 833, 778, I
754
w,m,m,s
substituted aromatic
! 1729, 1263,
1098, 1031
W
i unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
-Sample predominantly aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons with a trace of
ketone-or ester as evidenced by very weak absorption at 1728 on"1.
8-198
-------
TABLE 8-205.
1R REPORT
7X-LC4, upwind ambient, XAD-2 resin: LC cut #4 IR
to Number
, — i Intensity
(W ) i
m ' w
359,2929, 1
m I s
;I38, 1729 ! s
Assignment/Comments j
I
aromatic or olefim'c CH stretch i
|
aliphatic CH stretch \
ester or aliphatic ketone I
IB, 1494,
1465
w
aromatic
stretch
S3. 1380
m,w
aliphatic CH bending
35, 1116
s,m
ester of aromatic acid, aromatic or aliphatic etherj
11,754, 708 j w,w.s
substituted aromatic CH bend
B. 1588,
1380, 1315,
1177, 1098,
}, 1025
w
unassigned
Bands at 1098, 1069, 1025, 754, and 708 cm"1. Suggestive of roonosubstltuted
tozene.
Sample predominantly aromatic esters of considerable aliphatic character.
8-199
-------
TABLE 8-206.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: 7X-LC5. upwind ambient. XAD-2 resin: LC cut *5 IR
WIYI Nwnfatr j
(cm'1} I
InonsJty
Asstgnmtflt/Commerrts
3020
w
' aromatic or olefinic CH
! 2959. 2926,
2856
I aliphatic CH stretch
1725
i ester or aliphatic ketone
1602, 1584
w
! aromatic
1462, 1454
m
1 aliphatic CH bend
1380
w
i methyl CH bend
1273. 1122
s,m
aliphatic or aromatic C-0
i 798, 742, 710
w,w,s
substituted aromatic
: 1175. 1071
1026
w
i unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly aliphatic and/or aryl esters,
frequencies are highly suggestive or aromatic esters.
Bands for
-------
TABLE 8-207.
!R REPORT
?X^LC6, upwind arrlbieht. XAD^2 fesln: 1C tut #6 IP!
bM Number
Intensity
w
Assignment/Comments
ten ) i
15* 3036 w
W s
13,
m
1380
274,
' 1585 ! rn^w
m
w
1116 s,m
t
$, 711 m,s
ii
1174, i
IB, 1028, i
! aromatic or aliphatic CH
i ester or aliphatic ketone
aromatic or olefinic C-L-L-:-C
aliphatic CH bend
-ethyl CH bend
aromatic or aliphatic ether or ester or aromatic
acid
' substituted aromatic CH bend
unassigned
*KMAAKS:
Broad band at 3341 cm"1 due to H20 in cell.
c. ,
• Sanple composed primarily of aliphatic esters of aromatic acids with band at
''ted 741 cm being characteristic of mono-sub, benzene,
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-208.
1R REPORT
7X-LC7, upwind ambient. XAD-2 resin: LC cut *
IR
Wtvt Niimbtf
to-')
InttasiTy
Asrignnwnt/Commtnts
2965. 2930,
2859
! aliphatic CH stretch
1726
ester or aliphatic ketone
1603
m
i olefinic or aromatic C-1-1-1-!
i 1450
a1i phatic CH bend
1403
m
olefinic CH bend
1374
methyl CH bend
1274, 1109
m,s
aromatic ester or aromatic ether and aliphatic
716
ester
i olefinic C-H bend
i 1556, 1027,
940
w
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS;
Spectrum indicates sample is predominantly unsaturated esters, such as
acrylates, maleates, etc. Bands at 1603, 1403 and 716 cm suggests that vinyl
group is cis-disubstituted.
8-202
-------
TABLE 8-209.
!R REPORT
f — ' —
\ feilUmfcer ,
i Intensity
ta )
$•2856 m
]Zt w
n
* w
S w
1 s
1 : s
i
§,1020, !
S w
• : j
! '- - |
1
1
j
- |
:-- ', i
i
i
_ !
i
Assignment/Comments
aliphatic CH stretch
ketone or ester
conj. olefine and/or aromatic C-:-:-:-C
aliphatic CH bend
ester of aromatic acid
substituted aromatic cmpds
substituted aromatic cmpds
unassigned . .. .;-..
- -. ••"" ' ' •••-•: ••-• - ' ''i
i
••'•-.
\
!
i
i
l
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria
analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using
Transform IR technology.
Sample contains some saturated hydrocarbons and aromatic esters. Two sharp
.*»ds at 794 and 699 cm suggest that aromatic compounds are substituted such
tot 1, 3 and 5 adjacent hydrogens are present.
8-203
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-210.
IR REPORT
7XR-C, upwind ambient, canister rinse: concentrate IR
WmNwnbir
Intimity
Asagnmtnt/ComiMflts
3030
aromatic CH stretch
2950, 2930,
2855
aliphatic CH stretch
1725, 1715
ali phatic ketone or ester
1600, 1575
w
aromatic
stretch
1460, 1380
s,m
aliphatic CH bend
1295, 1280
I ester of aromatic or q.B-unsaturated acids or
aromatic ethers
! 1130, 1075
ester of aromatic or g.B-unsaturated acids,
aromatic or aliphatic ethers
1650, 820-760 !
w
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
This sample contains predominantly saturated and aromatic compounds.
Spectrum also indicates that sample contains aliphatic esters of aromatic
acids and saturated ethers.
8-204
-------
TABLE 8-211.
IR REPORT
6X-C, downwind ambient, XAD-2 resin: concentrate IR
W«v« Number
(cm'1)
^063.
\ 2963^2926.
Inanity
AssigtiatMt/Comintfro
W
i aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
aliphatic CH stretch
_JXWU
_1731_
1fi04,
1455,
.
1463
1377
s ' ester or aliphatic ketone
w,m '. cromatic C-1-1^ !
m,w ! aliphatic CH bend !
inrn 1 DOC ' !
;! 1020
' ester of aromatic acid
801, 711
s,m
substituted aromatic CH bend
1586, 1176,
864, 749
w
| unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample contains aromatic and aliphatic esters or ethers and possibly
aliphatic ketones.
8-205
-------
TABLE 8-212.
1R REPORT
SAMPLE-. 6XR-C, 16XAD can rinse #6. downwind ambient, canister rinse: concentratejj
Wavt Numbar
1729
1465
aignRMat/ComrotRts
(cm'1)
2962-2858
i
s 1 aliphatic CH
m
i ester or aliphatic ketone
1599-1584
w
i aromatic C-1-1-^
aliphatic CH bend
1378
w
methyl CH bend
! 1288, 1273
m,s
ester of aromatic acid or aromatic ether
1123, 1071
m
aromatic ester or aromatic or aliphatic ether
739
m
substituted aromatic CH bend
1071, 1066,
962. 812
w
t unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
• Bands at 2366 and 2340 cm"1 due to CCy
Bands at 677 oif due to residual metnylene chloride on salt plate
Bands at 1288 and 1273 cnfA highly suggestive of an ester of aromatic acid.
Sample is predominantly aliphatic esters of aromatic acids, or possibly arorefe
8-206
-------
TABLE 8-213.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
12P bioloaical sludge: biological treatment plant sludge, pH 7
,•11 i [•••^••••^•^^••i • II" • •"••• i !•• i i i ••.•••HI. im.n •••••••••••••^•^^••••^^••••••••i
extract: preliminary IR
Wave Numbtr i
(cm'1) j
3058 '
~~2960-2930 I
T857 i
1709 i
1642-1550 i
^1465 '•
1380
1282-1240 I
752 !
i
Intimity
w
s
s
w
m
m
w
w
w
t
i aromatic CH or olefinic CH
i aliphatic CH
: aliphatic and/or aldehydic CH
iketone, ester, aldehyde
i aromatic or olefinic C=C
i aliphatic CH (methylene) or aromatic C*C
• aliphatic CH (methylene) or a-naphthalene
1 aromatic ether or ester C-0
i aromatic CH
i
j
i
!
I
i
1
!
{
j
i
•• -t
1
831, 787, 697
w
unassigned
i
OTHER REMARKS:
-1
Inverted bands at 2370-2340 on" due to C02. Bands around 700-850 on
suggestive of 3-, 4-, and 5- adjacent aromatic CH.
-1
8-207
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-214.
IR REPORT
12-C bioloqical treatment plant sludqe, pH 7 extract:
concentrate IR
Wm Number
(cm'1)
Intimity
Assignmtnt/Coflimmts
3055
w
aromatic CH
2959-2856
aliphatic and aldehydic CH
1712
m
ketone, ester
1657
m
olefine (conj.) or aromatic C=C
1595
m
i aromatic ring (OC)
1458
m
aliphatic or aromatic CH
1376
aliphatic CH (methyl)
1273-1239
w
aromatic ether, or ester
752
m
(,-CH,-) rocking for n>4 or aromatic CH
821, 787, 691
w
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
-1
Bands at 2363 and 2342 cm are due to presence of C02 in cell, inadequate
purging.
Probable compounds and alkylated derivatives.
8-208
-------
TABLE 8-215.
IR REPORT
12-LC1. biological treatment plant sludge. oH 7 extract LC cut fl IR
Wavt Number
(cm'1)
Intensity
Assignment/Con meats
I 2959^2927,
2857
i aliphatic CH stretch
1463
m
j aliphatic CH methyl and methylene
i 1377
w
i aliphatic C-C methyl
I 720, 677
w
aromatic CH bend
2724, 1150
w
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
Bands at 2363 and 2342 cm"1 due to C02. Band at 676 cm"1 likely due to
residual CH2C12 left on plate.
Probable saturated hydrocarbons, with trace amounts of aromatic compounds.
8-209
-------
TABLE 8-216.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
12-LC2. biological treatment plant sludge., pH 7 extract:
LC cut #2 IR
**.*.*«
Assignimat/ComnMRts
(cat'1)
3013 w
2959-2863
1602
! 1458
s
w
m
1376 m
! 814, 746 w
' i
1 i
i
jromaVic or olefinic CH _ ;
aliphatic CH
aromatic C-C
aliphatic C-H bend
methyl CH bend
substituted aromatic
j .
i
i
!
1
! ! -
r " i
i ' ..!... . . _. _
i
i
s
i
1
j
i
t
' I
1 ! !
OTHER REMARKS:
-1
Bands at 2365 and 2340 cm due to CO,. Splitting pattern at 846, 814 and
'-1
746 cm highly suggestive of meta-substituted benzene.
Probable alkylated aromatic hydrocarbons.
8-210
-------
IPL£:
TABLE 8-217.
1R REPORT
12-LC3, biological treatment plant sludge, jaH 7 extract: 1C cut f_3 IR
i Wave Number
I ictn'1)
IntMsty
AsafiNMnt/CommMRs
aromatic or olefinic CH stretch
aliphatic C-H stretch
aliphatic C-H stretch
1184, 1150
w
m
' ketones, esters
]eo2 > s
445, 1376 ! s,m
259 : m
1 aromatic or olefinic C-C f
j aliphatic CH bend 1
i aromatic ether or ester • j
ether, ester
[83, 842, 814,
741
! substituted aromatic CH bend
'917, 1026,
951
w
unassigned
HER REMARKS:
Broad weak band at 3400 - 3200 cm suggests alcohols or phenols
Probable alkylated aromatic hydrocarbons.
8-211
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-218.
!R REPORT
12-LC4, biological treatment plant sludge, pH 7 extract: 1C cut *4 IR
Wtvt Numbtr
Icm'1)
intensity
Asstgnmtnt/Commfnts
3418
ID
i.OH or NH stretch (broad)
3048
! aromatic C-H
2959, 2856
aliphatic C-H
1718
ra
ketone, ester
! 1595
m
i aromatic or olefin OC
! 1458, 1438
methylene (doublet)
! 1376
m
-CH.
876, 828, 807 !
m
aromatic C-H
i 746
aromatic C-H
j 1328, 1266,
i . 1239, 1177,
1033, 951
w
I unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
Bands at 2363 - 2340 cm'1 are due to presence of C02 in cell.
Spikes about 1600 - 1800 are due to presence of water vapor in cell
Probable alkylated aromatic hydrocarbons.
8-212
-------
TABLE 8-219.
IR REPORT
£:
12-LC5, biological treatment j?1 ant I
. 7 extract: LC cut £5 IR
Wave Number
! (cm'1!
Inttnsity
AxsJfnmMt/Comawira
w
aromatic or olefinic CH
. 2924.
B56
aliphatic CH
D2
i aromatic
stretch
i aliphatic CH bend
75
w
imethyl CH bend
3, 821, 752
w,w,s
substituted aromatic
19, 1280,
184
w
i unassigned
IR REMARKS:
This sample possessed less mass than that required by the Level 1 criteria
or IR analysis. A spectrum of acceptable quality was obtained by using Fourier
ransform IR techniques.
Sample contains only saturated, unsaturated and/or aromatic hydrocarbons.
ossibly some ketones or esters present as evidenced by small absorption at
712 cm'1.
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-220.
IR REPORT
12-LC6, bioloqical treatment plant sludge, pH 7 extract: 1C cut f6 IR
Wivt Number
(em' )
Inttnsfty
Assignment/Commtnts
3281
broad (M)
alcoholic, phenolic or acid OH
! 3055
! aromatic OR olefinic CH
2959, 2931,
i
2856
1712
1657
1602
1451, 1376
1280
1191
810, 752
1081, 1033,
835, 615
s
s
s
s
W
m
m
m
w
aliphatic CH
ketone or ester
carboxylic acid or ketone
aromatic or olefinic C^-^C
aliphatic CH bend
acid, ester of aromatic acid
ether, alcohol or phenol
substituted aromatic CH
unassigned
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly phenolic compounds, or carboxylic acids,
8-214
-------
SAMPLE:
TABLE 8-221.
IR REPORT
12-LC7, biological treatment plant sludge. pH 7 extract: LC cut #7 IR
3550-3000
Intensity
broad I phenol or alcoholic OH stretch
_3061
2931, 2856
1602
~1280, 1122,
j aromatic or olefinic
aliphatic CH stretch
i aromatic or olefinic
1040
m
alcohol or phenol
328, 760
w
substituted aromatic CH bend
! 1664, 1726
w
! unassigned
•- i
OTHER REMARKS:
Sample predominantly alcohol or phenolic compounds.
8-215
-------
TABLE 8-222.
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: 9A-LC2, final cooler cooling tower hot well, pH 2 extract: LC cut
LRH
Major Categories
Intensity
100
.
Catt gory
PNA's,
•
MW Range,
,-.
.i
f
i ' ii
Sub-Categories, Specific Compounds
Intensity
100
100
100
100
100
100
-
Category
naohthalene
ohenanthrene, anthracene
pyrene
chrysene, triphenylene
perylene, benzpyrene
anthanthrene
.. ••
m/e
128
178
202
252
252
276
Composition
Other intensity
Comments
100
10
100
m/e 152
m/e 368. No significant features at m/e greater than 368.
acenaphthylidene?, m/e 152 PNA assignments supported by IR.
8-216
-------
TABLE 8-223.
LRMS REPORT
: 9A-LC6, final cooler cooling tower hot well, pH 2 extract:
LC cut #6 LRMS
Major Categories
Intensity
.
Category
none -
MM Rang*
. f
Sub-Categories. Specific Compound*
Intensity
.. . -
Ctagefy
none
m/t
Composition
.•
-.'•••
•' .. •
Oa»«f. Intensity " Comments
No significant ion intensity > ^20 amu
10 Prominent ions (70 eV) at m/e 414, 410, 386, 368, 349, 337, 280, 263
100
m/e 195, 149, 123, 109,149 possible phthalate.
8-217
-------
TABLE 8-224.
LRMS REPORT
8A-LC1, ammonia liquor, pH 2 extract: 1C cut #1 LRMS
SAMPLE:
Major Cragorits
IntvMdty
10
100
Cragory
PNA's
Aliphatic ,
'•-'•":-.';• • .. . . . . . . <
MWRanp!
!
>.
!
Sub-Cattgorics, Specific Compottmb
Intensity
10
10
10
Cmgery
perylene, benzpyrene
chrysene, triphenylene
anthracene, phenanthracene
,
m/t
252
228
178
Composition .
Intensity
Comments
100 i
Clusters to high intensity peaks every 14 arau.
-^55 amu. Suggestive of saturated chains.
From -^125 amu to
8-218
-------
EE 8-225.
j*S REPORT
8A-LC2, ammonia liquor, pH 2 extract: LC cut #2 LRMS
Ijgr Cattgoriej
bmnsity
100
10
Category
PNA's
PNA's
MWRtng.
jCtttgoms, Specific Compounds
tattnaty
100
10
10
10
, 10
1
Cattgory
Pyrene
Perylene, benzpyrene
Chrysene, triphenylene
Anthracene, phenanthrene
Acenaphthylene ?
Anthracene ?
m/t
202
252
228
178
152
276
Composition
Intensity
Comments
8-219
-------
TABLE 8-226.
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE; 8A-LC3, ammonia liquor. pH 2 extract: LC cut 13 LRMS
Major Cat*gdrta
Intensity
100
CJtttgory
PNA's
•••-
MW Bangs
Sab-Categories. Specific Compounds
Intensity
100
100
100
10
Category
perylene, benzpyrene
Ghrysene, triphenylene
Pyrene
Anthracene, phenanthrene
m/t
252
228
202
178
Composition
Otiwr Intensity
Conments
100
High molecular
compatible with
weight PNA's @ m/e 404, 378, 352, 326. 302 7 276. _
IR. ^
-
8-220
-------
0S REPORT
. 8A-LC4, ammonia liquor, pH 2 extract: LC cut #4 LRMS
IjrCrasorics
Intensity
100-10
Category
Amines
MWRang*
.
m, Specific Compounds
brttnoty
10-100
1."
r
i £
: •.- '
• •.
Category
Holyaromatic amines
m/t
341
317
291
267
241
217
Composition
Intensity
Comments
8-221
-------
TABLE 8-228.
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE; 8A-LC7, ammonia liquor. pH 2 extract: LC cut 15 LRMS
Major Categories
Inttnstty
10
Cattsory
PNA's
. . . .
MWR»ng»
_
Sufa-Catvgorits. Specific Compounds
timfttny
10
...
Cangory
pcrylene, benzpyrene
triphenylene, chrysene,
pyrene
anthracene , phenanthrene
m/t
252
228
202
178
Composition
Oth«r Intensity
Coitments
100
I m/e 256?
j No signi f1 cant 1on i ntensIty
8-222
-------
TABLE 8-229.
IRMS RSPORT
SIMPLE: 8A-LC6, ammonia liquor, pH 2 extract? LC cut #6 LRMS
ftjor Categories
Intensity
10-100
r
•
Category
Amines
-
MWRangt
.
**, Specific Compound*
Intensity
10-100
';-
-•-
•••
f
I
•
•
•
Category
Amines. These materials show ion charac-
teristic of condensed aromatic rings.
. ..
m/e
303
"279"
253
229
203
195
179
159
145
Composition
Intensity
Comments
10-100
m/e 184, 122
-------
TABLE 8-230.
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE- 8B-LC3, anmonla liquor,. pH 12 extract; LC cut 13 LRMS
Major CattgeriM
IntMwty
100
Gregory
PNA's
t
•
MWRans,
Sub-CattgorMc, Spacifte Campotsndi
hntMHy
100 , :
10
10
10
100
. 100
.'•;•-•
Cragorr
naphthalene
anthracene, phenanthrene
pyrene
chrysene, triphenylene
.perylene, benzpyrene
anthanthrene
-.
m/«
128
178
202
228
252
276
Composition
Other Intensity
Comnents
•»•^»»^^^ . -
100 @ high | Ions at m/e 476. 474. 450, 426, 424. 400. 376. 374, 352, 350, 326^.
«_ UA. C. —. J..».__. i "^ j^rt ^» 1^1 . _
probe tetnper| 302. Overall ms pattern strongly Indicative of high molecular
atures j weight PNA's. PNA assignments supported by IR.
8-224
-------
me 8-23i.
UUttS REPORT
-LC4, ammonia liquor. pH 12 extract: 1C cut #4 LRMS
tbjor CittgoritJ
j..
Inttnsity
Category
MW Rang*
,
.
1
lb£lt»gom*, Specific Compound*
Inttnsity
Category
Composition
Intensity
Comments
No significant ion intensity >>v420 amu (70 eV). Many prominent Ions
throughout spectra of odd m/e (70 eV and 20 eV). Consistent with
amine structures as indicated by IR. No PNA's present.
8-225
-------
TABLE 8-232.
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE; 8B"LC6» ammonia liquor, pH 12 extract; 1C cut 16 LRMS
Major Categories
Intensity
100
Cattflory
Amines? m/e 401 (possibly halogenated),
377 {ionizing voltage * 20 eV}
-
MWRanp
.
.
Sub-Categories. Specific Compound*
IfitcfuiYy
Crageiy
m/«
Composition
Oth^. Intensity Conments
m/e 327, 303, 277, 168, 149, 129 (ionizing voltage = 70 eV> Data not-
sufficient for subcategory or compound assignment.
8-226
-------
MBLt 0-iiJ2.
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: 8B-LC7, ainnonia liquor. pH 12 extract: LC cut #7 LRMS
Ifejor Cattgoms
Intensity
1-10
Category
PNA's
MW Rangfl •
—
.
Sob-CattgoriM. Specific Compounds
Intensity
10
10
10
h'-- ' '' '
, • .
Category
perylene, benzpyrene
chrysene, triphenylene
pyrene
•
m/»
^
252
228
202
Gornpotftwr : ;
No significant ion intensity
300 with exception of one Ion at
m/e 368.
100 jm/e 168, 144, 130, 118 (?)
"To m/e 182 ""
8-227
-------
ADDITIONAL DATA
8-228
-------
rnvn
ii.mii
co
PO
Stream
Number
Stream Identification
Rate: Constituents Based on 1 Mo, Coke Product IOH
1 Coal
2 Coke
3 Tar Decanter-fugitive
4 Tar Sludge
5 lar Dewaterfng-Fugitfve
6 l»r Storage-Fugitive
7 Primary Cooler Coiiduiisale
fugitive
0 far Ret inioy Vapor
9 Chemical Oit Storage-Fugitive
10 Excess liquor Tauk&-Fuyilive
U Sulfale Drying
12 Acid Storage-Fugitive
13 Line leg Sludge
14 Barometric Condenser Wdter
15 Excess Ammonia Liquor
1C Naphthalene Separation
I? KaplttltitcfW Brying
18 Find I Cooler Coaling Tower
19 Cooling Tower Slowdown
20 light Oil Plant Wattewater
21 Wa*h Oil T«nkt-fug*ilve
22 tifllit Oil Bec4nter-Fufliti»«
23 Light Oil St»r»ge-tugitiv«
24 Wash Oil Sludg* '"'
25 Oesulfuri^atlon Waslevater
26 Oesulfuriiation Sludge
21 Wattowater Plant Fugitive
28 WastewdUr Plant Sludge
29 Find I Effluent
1.4 MS
1 Mfl
2.15 swVMg: benzene, 15.6 a/Mg; II^S 12.7 a/Mg; XAD-2 sample priiwrily 1C cut *2«
B.I l/Mg (very rewj(•>$; XAB-2 sample mostly
1C cuts *2* and 13 *
2.9 s»:l/H(j: Naphthalene emissions as Myh as 533 g/sm1, but an average must L>e considerably lower
3.230 sm-VMfl: benzene, SI. 6 o/Mfl; H2S. 11 fl/Mfl; X*0-2 sample mestly LC cuts *2* and «3
43-430 l/Ufl: cyanide. 22-43 fl/Mfl; ammonia, fl-17 g/Hfl; phenoj. 10-16 a/Mg (Ounlap.and
McHichael)
100-500 l/Mg: cyanide, 0,5-1 g/Mg; ammonia, 8.5-1,6 g/Mg; phenol, fl.8-26 g/Mg (Dunlap and
ami McMichael); 3 ka/Mtfoil (Scnroeder)
No measurable vent: not sampled
Inaccessible: not Measured or observed
0.013 smVMtj working loss, IS. 6 sms/Mg breathing loss (crude estimate95):
toluene, 0.6 fl/Mg; «jS, O.S g/Mg
benzene, 17.4 g/Mg;
Not campled and rat* not available.
40-60 l/Mg vacuum carbonate plant: cyanide,
Not quantified
No measurable rat* -.
1.7 kg/Mg: high phenolic levels
470-1,260 I/My coke: BfCTCA gives 730 l/Mg;
1.5 g/Ng; Jl. 11 , '"
64 g/Mg (Dunlap and McMichael)
cyanide, 20 g/M«; ammonia, 91 g/Mg; phenol,
*tC Cut « expected to contain aromatic hydrocarbons. f-t^J palycycMcs. «uked wmalUrnant polycyclics. and possibly fcalogenated aromatics.
-------
TABLE 15. SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYSIS, TAR DECANTER VAPOR
^Emission rate: 2.15 sm3/Mg coke
Compounds Identified
by GC
Cl-C? HC(Avgt MWa22)
Benzene
Toluene:
Xy^lenes and ethyl btnzefle:,,
Sulfur compounds (a's HiSr)
Liquid Chromatograftfiy ;
MKipnatig nyarocaroons:
Halogenated alipha tics'
f-
ft 3?yjyf£\ ^*^? f^ij ^ j*yffi 4?vT y^tfi?tff
Halogenated aroma tics
S&t3TOcualAGydes,^.et®it^t;
fff|K«ron»tlc|
Alcohols .
wiones
Ph&iols
Esters, anuaas
Me reap tans
Carboxylfc acids
Sulfpxides
GRAJf'/conc. inis;aropled gSl
TC0> cone, fn sampfled^gas .
Concentration,
jig/sm3
4,550
7,283
746
186
5,914
, _ MATE '-
vCoBpan'son
V|tue, mg/sra3 ;
141.8
3.2
S13
43.0
'^ O.SS
0.95
|85 j
^Jj^ Q
— OJB« Q "
"' 3.33
- 6.^: ..-
8/16
5.9
157
. 2.95
24.2
2.96
>, 720-3, 550
5|llO ,
MEGsa MATE5
Category Values,
Number mg/sra3
1 rain. » 32
15
15:
15
53^
M|Gsa
Category
lc
2C
1C?
23,24,25
13b
3C94C ,
' '.7? ! '.."
I7e :
5C,6C
10C,11C,12C
15,13^2^
8C,8DC
13AC
8A,88C
14C
mg/sm3
mg/sm3
3
375
435
15
Min. MATEb
Value in
Category
32
0.1
1.0
0.7
0.1[3]d
20
1.1
0.01
0.2
1.0
10
0.001
o.iliof-
1.0
1.0
0.3
1.0
Ratio
/Cone. Found \
142
2,430
2.0 .
0.43
394
Ratio
4.4C
32C
513
61. 4C
3.5~[0.1}d
0.04° ...
0.86C
18,500C
414C
3.33C '
0.64C
8,160C
S9°lO.S9f
157C
2.95C
81C
2.96C
MEG; - Mulfimed^Ta]'En»1ron%itnt|li&ais
Mini mum Acute Toxiclty Effluent
cNot indicated by GC/MS work
Reflects compounds found by GC/MS worl
Italics highlight categories found by
GC/MS.
8-230
-------
TABLE 16. (continued)
CO
IS)
w
Elutlon
Temperature
m
70
70
98.3
101.2
107.9,113.1
118.5
123.0
124.6
131.0
134.8
140.6
143.5
174.4
149.2
153.1
156.3
156.9
158.8
Compound
Benzene
Toulene (?)
Phenol
Indene
Cresols a
Oi vinyl benzene (?)
Naphthalene
Benxothiophene
Quinoline or isoqulnollne
Methyl indene
Methyl naphthalene
Methyl naphthalene
Indole
Methyl -qulnoline
Biphenyl
C2 -naphthalene
€2 -naphthalene
C2 -naphthalene
IDENTIFICATION
Elutlon
Temperature
(°c)
161.7
162.3
167.1
167.7
172.3
178.3
180.3
183.5
185.7
186.3
187.9
201.4
204.6
205.5
206.2
220.3
236.3
241.7
Compound
C^-naphthalene
Biphenylene
Acenaphthene
Methyl-biphenyl
Oibenzofuran
Methyl -acenaphthene
Fluorene
Carbazole (?)
Hydroxyfluorene isomer
Methyl acenaphthene isomer (?)
Hydroxyfluorene isomer
Oibenzothiophene
Phenanthrene
d10-anthraceneb
Anthracene (?)
4 ,5-Methylenephenanthrene
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
QUANTITATION
Of those compounds Identified, only qutnoline and blphenyl were quantitated.
Subjectively, naphthalene appeared to be the prevalent compound.
Wt. of Compound
In XAO Extract
Wt. of Compound
1n Canister Rinse
Compound
Total Wt.
Concentration (mg/sm3)
In Gas Sample
snyl
)11ne
144.3
294.2
14.9
29.1
159.2
323.3
19.6
39.7
aOften an artifact from sample contact with plastics.
Internal standard.
-------
TABLE 16. SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYSIS, PRIMARY COOLER CONOENSATE TANK VENT
oo
ro
U)
ro
Emission Rate: 1.7 s»a/Mg coke
Compounds Identified by GC
C,-C7 HC (Average MW=23.6)
Benzene
Toluene
Xylenes and ethylbenzene
Sulfur compounds (as H2S)
Concentration
mg/sm3
1,883
5.230
649
215
3,324
MEG's Category3
Number
1
15
15
15
53
MAT£ Value5
(mg/sma)
win. = 32
3
375
435
15
Ratio
(Found \
TRTEV
59
1,740
•1.7
0.5
222
MEG = Multi-Media Environmental Goals.
'MATE = Minimum Acute Toxicity Effluent.
-------
"ABLE 17. SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYSIS, VAPOR ABOVE TAR STORAGE TANK
Emission rate: 0.14 sm3/Mg coke
Compounds Identified
by GC
Ci-Cj HC(Avg. MWal9)
Benzene
Toluene
Xylenes and ethyl benzene
Sulfur compounds (as H2S)
Liquid Chromatography
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated aliphatics
AroTnatia hydrocarbons
Haloqenated aroraatics
Retaroeyc.li.c :V, 0, S
cjjmpounds
Sul fides, disul fides
IHtriles
Ethers
Aldehydes, ketones
Nitroaromatics
Alcohols
Amines
Phenols
Esters, amides
Mefcaptans
Carboxyl ic acids
Sulfoxides
Concentration,
mg/sm3
3.75
65.6
21.1
16.3
not detected
MATE
Comparison
Value, mg/sm3
1.6
0.16
32.1
1.45
1.11
1.11
1.11
19.5
23.5
0.71
8.1
1.79
6.7
30.1
1.1
1.1
1.1
MEGsa
Category
Number
1
15
15
15
53
MEGs*
Category
Number
lc
2C
15,224,22
16C
25,2.^,25
13BC
9
3<4C
7C
17C
5,6C
10C,11C,12C
18,19°, 20°
8C,80C
13AC
8AC,8BC
14c
MATE5
Values,
rag/sm3
roin. » 32
3 '
375
435
. 15
Win. MATEb
Value in
Category
32
0.1
1.0
0.7
O.I
20
i-lCStf]*2
0.01
0.2
f.O
10
0.001
o.i[ic]d
1.0
1.0
0.3
1.0
Ratio
/Cone. Founc
\ MATE
0.12
22
0.06
0.04
-
Ratio
0.05°
1.6°
S2.2
2.1C
*M;,;-;
o.oe0
i.cPfa
1,950C
143C
0.71C
0.31C
1,770C
87*10.?:
30. 1C
1.1C
3.7C
1.1C
[)
3
-------
TABLE 17. (continued)
00
CO
Elutlon
Temperature
(°C)
70.0
70.0
70.0
77.2
79.5
80.1
90.7
92.6
93.9
94.5
9>3.7
101.5
104.4
107.3
108.9
1U.7
113.1
Compound
Benzene
Toluene
Pyrldlne
HI- and p-Xylenes
Styrene*
p-Xylene
Benzofuran
Met hylpyri dines
Benzofuran
C} -benzenes
Phenol
Indene
CM -benzenes
Cresol
CioHiz Isomer
Cresol
Methyl Indene
IDENTIFICATION
Elutlon
Temperature
(°C)
122.0
122.7
124.9
131.6
141.2
143.5
153.4
157.5
159. 8
163.3
168.1
173.2
181.9
190.5
190.5
205.9
207.5
QUANT I TAT I ON
Compound
C2-phenol (?)
Naphthalene
Benzothlopfiene
Qulnollne
Methyl naphthalene
Methyl naphthalene
Biphenyl
G2 -naphthalene
Co-naphthalene
Blphenylene or acenaphthylene (?)
Acenaphthene
Olbenzofuran
Fluorene
X -methyl acenaphthylene
Amlnoethylcarbazole
Phenanthrene b
dj9-anthracene
Compound
Of those oompounda identified, only quinoline and biphenyl uere quantitated.
Subjtsativaly, naphthalene appeared to be the prevalent compound.
Wt. of Compound
In XAO Extract
Wt. of Compound
In Canister Rinse
(ma)
Total Wt.
Concentration (mg/sm3)
In Gas Sample
Biphenyl
Quinol ine
10.4
31.1
0.5
1.4
10.9
32.5
1.9
5.8
Often an artifact from sample contact with plastics.
-------
TABLE IS. SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYSIS, VAPOR ABOVE CHEMICAL OIL TANK
Emission rate: 0.024sm3/Mg coke
Compounds Identified
by GC
Ci-C7 HC(Avg. MW216)
Benzene
Toluene
Xylenes and ethyl benzene
Sulfur compounds
(as H,S)
Liquid Chromatography
Aliphatic 'nydrocarbons
'dalogenated aliphztics
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated aromatics
Eeterocyclic N, 0, S
compounds
Sul fides, disul fides
iVitriZ.es
Ethers
Aldehydes, ketones
Ni troaromatics
Alcohols
Aninss
Phenc la
Estsrs, amides
Mercaptans
Carboy Us acids
Sul fox ides
GRAV cone, in sample
TCO cone, in sample
Concentration
mg/sm3
1.86
327
266
200
not
detected
HATE
Comparison
Value
mg/sm3
(34.8)
(3. 48)
(640)
(57.7)
(8.34)
(8.64)
(8.64)
(186)
(165)
(4.2)
(6.3)
(*•*)
(4.9)
(165)
(4.9)
(4.3)
(4.9)
860-1,950
2,050
MEGs3
, Category
number
1
15
15
15
53
MEGs3
Category
Number
1
2
1S.21A.22
16
23, 24, 25
138
9
3,4
7
17
5,6
10,11,12
18,19,20
8C.80
13A
At, 00
14
mg/sm3
mg/sra3
MATEb
Values,
mg/sm3
min. * 32
3
375
435
15
L
Min. MATE0
Value in
Category
32
0.1
1.0
0.7
0,1 .
20
1-1
0.01
0.2
1.0
10
0.001
0.1
1.0
1.0
0.3
1.0 '
Ratio
/'Cone. Found \
V MATE )
0.06
109
0.709
0.46
Ratio
1.1
5
840
82
86
'0.43
7.3
18,600
825
4.2
0.63
6,300
49
165
4.9
16. S
4.9
MEG * Multimedia Environmental Goals
bMATE * Minimum Acute Toxicity Effluent
Values in parentheses are partially based on GRAV mass before subtraction
of blanfc.
Italics highlight categories found by GC/MS in other samples.
8-235
-------
TABLE 19. SUMMARY OF ORGAN1C ANALYSIS, FROTH FLOTATION SEPARATOR
Emission rate: unknown
Compounds Identified
by GC
C!-C7 HCCAvg. MWa24)
Benzene
Toluene
Xylenes and ethyl benzene
Sulfur compounds (as H2S)
Liquid Chromatography
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
Halooenatad alipha-ics
Aromatic hudrocsrbons
Halogenated aromatics
MEGs*
Concentration, Category
mg/sa3
2,051
4,700
488
82.1
2,125
MATE
Number
1
15
15
15
53
MEGsa
Comparison Category
Value, mg/sm3 Number
(ll.l)
(l.Jfi
(33.3)
(1.69
\
Heterocyclic ft, 0, S compounds (l.O?
Sulfides, disulfides
fctriles
Ethers
Al dehydes , ketones
Nitroaroraatics
Alcohols
Aainss
Phenols
Esters, amides
Mercaptans
C*-JZ2*£)£Crt* ^ 'IfO CL'%^£.£
Sulfoxides
GRAV cone, in sample
TCO cone, in sample
(l.07
'(l-07
H
&4
•»
) 2
15,21^22
16
23,24,25
13B
): -»"••
3,4
7
(0.96) 17
(l2. 8S
H
(S.dj
(43.5J
(l.2)
(!.A
w
18.9-19
5,6
10,11,12
13,13,20
8C.80
... 13A
3A,33
14
.9 mg/sm3
MATE5
Values,
. •*
ng/sm3
nrin. « 32
3
375
435
15
Min. MATEb
Value i-n
Category
32
0.1
1.0
0.7 '
0.1
20
1.1
0.01
0.2
1.0
10
0.001
0.1
1.0
. .. . i.o
0.3
1.0
Ratio
/Cone. Found \
\ MATE j
64
1,570
1.3
0.2
140
Ratio
Q. Z6.
11.3
33.3- •
2.41
10. 7
0.05
- ,^' .
2,220
200"
1.0
1.28
Jj 400
53
43.5
1-2
J
1.2
660 mg/sm3
MEG = Multimedia Environmental Goals
MATE = Minimum Acute Toxi
city Effluent
Values in parentheses are based on GRAV mass before subtraction
of blank.
Italics highlight categories found by GC/MS in other samples.
8-236
-------
TABLE 20. SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYSIS, FINAL COOLER COOLING TOWER VAPOR
Emission rate: 3,230 sarVMg coke
Compounds Identified
by GC
Cj-C7 HC (Avg. MWS16)
Benzene
Toluene
Xylenes and ethyl benzene
Sulfur compounds (as H2S)
,
Liquid Chromatography
Ali.'sha'cis hydrocarbons
Raiocanztad alizhc.'si.cs
Arcmsvia hydrocarbons
Halogenated aromatics
Heterosyal-la j, 0, S
Compounds
Sul fides, disul fides
Mtrilas
Ethers
Aldehydes, ketones
tficrocrcmcrisa
Alcohols
Arrlr^s
fier^ls
Esters, amides
Mercaptans
Carboy lie c/rids
Sul fox ides
GRAV cone, in sample
TCO cone, in sample
Concentration,
mg/sm3
1.89
15.8
not detected
not detected
3.3
MATE
Comparison
Value, mg/sm3
(1.80)
(o.oa)
(4.75)
(0.21)
(O.OB)
(0.09)
(0.08)
(2.38)
(3-68)
(0.17)
(1.42)
(0.2S)
(0.21)
(3.63)
(0.21)
('•«)
(0.21)
2.75-10.6 ng/SB3
226 mg/sm3
HEG's
Category
Number
1
15
15
15
53
MEG's3
Category
Number
1
2
1S,21A,22
16C
23,24,25
138C
.,,,.*...-.•
3*,4C
7C
-. 17
5C,6C
io,irti2a
18t13r,20°
8CC,80C
13AC
3A,8B
14C
MATE6
Values,
mg/sm3
min. = 32
3
375
435
15
Min. MATE5
Value in
Category
32
0.1
1.0
0.7
0.1
20
. . J. 1 ,
0.01
0.2
1*0
10
0.001^.
O.l[l0.
1.0
1.0
0.3
1.0
Ratio
/Cone. Found
\ MATE
0.06
5.3
-
-
0.2
Ratio
0.09
0.8
4.78
0.3C
0.8
0.004C
0,0*
Z3* '"'
*.*
0.2?
0.14C
19 f UOlO.Olf
f* Z.^{0.i
3.MC
.0.21e
0.7
0.216
MEG = Multimedia Environmental Goals
''MATE = Minimum Acute Toxicity Effluent
Va.Tues in pa-r-8'rttheses are based on GRAV
mass before substraction of blank.
GNot indicated by GC/MS work
Reflects compounds found by GC/MS work
Italics highlight categories found
by GC/MS.
8-237
-------
TABLE 20. (continued)
00
IDENTIFICATION
Elutiori
Temperature
rc)
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
100.0
iOO.O
100.0
100.0
102. 1
105.6
106.9
107.9
108.8
109.6
112.7
115.5
116.2
118.1
Compound
1 , 1 , 1-Trichloroethan*
Benzene
Cyclohexeno
Pyridine
Toluene
X-methylpyridines
Xylenes
Pheny I acetylene (?)
C2-pyridines
Styrene
C2-pyridine
(lenzoni trile
Aniline
Benzofuran
G2-pyridine (?)
Phenol
Indene
C7HUH isomer
Cresols
C10H|2 isomer
Elution
Temperature
(°C)
125.1
128.3
129.3
137.6
144.0
145.3
147.5
151.7
156.8
161.3,163.2
166.7
171. b. 171. 9
172.9
176.3
186.3
193.9.198.1
210.3
210.6
265.0
265.0
Compound
Methyl Indenes
Ca- phenols
Naphthalene
Quinoline
Methylbenzothlophene 1 (outer
Methylnaphthalene
Methyl naphthalene
Indole
Blphenyl
C2- naphthalene Isonwrs
Biphenylene
CiaH,2 and C14HM IsMers,
acenaphthene
Olbenzofuran
Fluorene
Ami no ethyl carbazole (?)
Phenanthrene
0 10- anthracene
a phthalate.
a phthalatea
QUANTITATION
Of those compounds identified, only quinoline and bipheny) were quant itated.
Compound
Bi phony t
Quinolme
Subjectively, naphthalene appeared
Wt. of Compound Wt. of Compound
In XAl) Extract in Canister Rinse
(mcj) (mg)
1.7 0
10.2 0
to be the prevalent
Total Wt.
1.7
10.2
compound.
Concentration (mg/sm3)
in Gas Sample
0.06
0.37
aOften an artifact from sample contact with plastics.
^Internal standard.
-------
TABLE 22. SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYSIS, LIGHT OIL STORAGE
Emission. Rate: 15.6 sma/Mg coke
Compounds Identified
by GC
Ct-C7 HC (Average MWS46)
Benzene
Toluene
Xylenes and ethyl benzene
Sulfur compounds (as H2S)
• aMEG = Multimedia Environmental
^ . i
**> MATE = Minimum Acute Toxic itv 1
Concentration
mg/sm3
225
1,040
36.8
not detected
37-44
Goals.
Effluent.
MEG's Category3
Number
1
15
15
15
53
MATE Valueb
(mg/sm3)
min. = 32
3
375
435
15
Ratio
/Found\
UATE j
7
347
0.1
—
2.5-2.9
-------
TABLE 25. SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYSES, BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE
oo
ro
S
Liquid Ohromatography
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
llalogenated aliphatics
Aromatic hydrocarbons
llalogenated aromatics
Heterocyclic N, 0, S compounds
Sulfide. disulfides
Nitriles
Ethers
Aldehydes, ketones
Nitroaromatics
Alcohols
Amines
Phenols
Esters, amides
Mercaptans
Carboxylic acids
Su If ox ides
GRAV cone.
TCO cone.
HATE
Comparison
Value,.
»g/Kgc
2.1
0.2
6.45
0.13
0.025
0.025
0.025
3.32
3.5
0.3
3.00
0.30
3.2
3.5
0.33
2.73
0.03
5.9 - 7.4 mg/kg
0.4 - 17.8 «g/kg
MEG's
Category
Number
1
2
15.21A.22
16
23,24,25
13B
9
3.4
7
17
5.6
10,11,12
18.19.20
8C.80
13A
8 A. 88
14
Min. MATE
Value In
Category
None
published
20
0. 003
o.oooei
3.0
None
published
2.0
20
0.2
2.0
2.0
0.04
0.01
0.003
36
2.0
1,200
Ratio
None
published
0.01
2,150
13,000
0.008
-
6.612
6.17
17.5
0.15
1.5
7.5
320
1,170
0.01
1.4
0.00002
aMEG = Multimedia Environmental Goals.
MATE = Minimum Acute Toxicity Effluent.
cSludge density assumed to be 1 a/ml.
b
-------
TABLE 28. BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PLANT TESTING-SELECTED RESULTS1
COMPONENT
Ammonia
Organic carbon
Chloride (din.)
Cyanide Amenable to Chlorination
Total cyanide
Cyanide (AISI)
Nitrogen { Kjeldahl)
Suspended solids
Solvent extract (oil) EPA method
Sulfate (dissJ
Sulfide
Thiocywate(SCN)
Cyanctc (CNO)
Phenolic compounds (phenol)
pH
Organic compounds
acenephthene
benzene
cvbon tetrachloride
chlerobeuene
hexachloro benzene
1,1,2.2-tetraehlofoetfiana
2-chloranaehthalena
2,4,S-tricbloro phenol
panchlorometa eresol
chloroform
2-chlorophanol
1.1-dichloroethytene
2.4-dicMorophenol
2,4-dinitfotototno
2, Mm tro toluene
1 ,2-diphanyihy drazina
ethylbenzene
fluorantfiene
2-flitrophtnol
4-nitrophenol
2.4-dinitrophenol
4,S-dinitro-o-cresal
pentachloro phenol
phenol
9is{2-ethy»hexyl)phthalate
butyl benzyl phthalata
di-n-butyl phttialate
di-n-octyl phthalata
dimethyl phthalata
benzo(a) anthracene
benzoiatpyrene
3,4-benzofluoranthene
bttuof klflucrtntrnne
chrysene
acenaphtnylene
anthracene
benzotgnilperyler.e
fluorene
phenanthrene
ditaenzotaji tenth racene
indent 1 2-3-tdlpyrene
pyrane
tetrachloraetttylena
toluene
trichloroethylene
UNITS
mg/1
mg/1
mg/|
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
mg/1
AVERAGE OF
FEED
28
383
371
0,43
2.74
0.18
102
79
20
202
1S3
197
3.S
231
1U
3 SAMPLES
EFFLUENT
0.73
S3
202
0.33
2.34
0.07
104
39
4.3
342
<0.3
0.73
0.35
0.028
7.4
Renos from 3 Samples
PPb
PPb
ppb
PPb
PPb
ppb
ppb
PPb
PPb
PPb
ppb
ppb
PPb
ppb
PPb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
PPb
ppb
ppb
PPb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
ppb
PPb
PPb
ppb
ppb
PPb
ppb
ppb
ppb
PPb
ppb
PPb
ppb
ppb
PPb
ppb
0
0<3SO •
0
Oto 250
0 to 17.100 '
OOOO
Ota ISO
NO
NO to 2.130
0 to < 3400
NO
oto«4,so«
NO to 4^00 : "
d
Oto 29.700
0
fl to 100
Oto 190
NO
NO
NO
NO
NO
112.OOOto13t.SOO
On 29.000
200 to 8 .500
40 to 12.100
Oto 350
0
Oto 2.270
0 to 330
Oto«140
Oto
-------
TABLE 28. SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYSIS, UPWIND AMBIENT
Compounds Identified
by GC
CrC7 HC (Avg. MW * 16)
Benzene
Toluene
Xy lanes and ethyl benzene
Sulfur compounds (as H2S)
Liquid Chromotography
Aliphatic hydrocarbon*
Halogen a tad aliphatics
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated aromatlcs
Eeterocyclic Sf 0, S
compounds
Sul fides, disul fides
Nitrites
Ethers
Aldehydes, ketanes
Sitroaromatics
Alcohols
Amines
Phenols
Esters, amides
Mercaptans
CarbosTjlic acids
Sul fox ides
GRAY cone, in sampled gas
TOO cone, in sampled gas
Concentration,
mg/sm3
1.9
1.95
not detected
not detected
not detected
MATE
Comparison
Value
rag/sm3
0.12
..
0.32
0.02
_
—
— .
0.33
0.20
'0.41
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.33
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.3- -1.4 mg/sm
3.6 mg/sm3
MEGsa
Category
Number
-1
15
15
15
53
MEGs*
Category
Number
2
2
15, 21A, 22
16
23, 24, 25
13B
9
3, 4
7
17
5, 6.
Iff, 11, 12
18, 1», 20
8C, 80
13A
8A, 8B
14
3
MATE5
Value, /C<
mg/sm3 I
m1n. » 32
3
375
435
15
v
M1n. MATE0
Value in
Category
22
0.1
1.0
0.7
0.1
20
1.1
0.01
0.2
1.0
10
0.001
0.1
1.0
1.0
0.3
1.0
Ratio
DTK. Found
~~MATT^
0.06
0.65
--"
— .
--
Ratio
0.004
--
0.32
0.03
—
--
—
33 ..,
l.ft':
0.01
0.003
20
0.3
0.33
0.03
0.1
0 . 03
*MEG » Multimedia Environmental Goals.
bMATE * Minimum Acute Toxitity Effluent.
Italics highlight categories found by GC/MS in some samples.
8-242
-------
TABLE 29. SUMMARY OF ORGANIC ANALYSIS, DOWNWIND AMBIENT
Emission Rate
Compounds Identified
by GC
C!-C7 HC (Avg. MW s 15)
Benzene
Toluene
Xy lanes and ethyl benzene
Sulfur compounds (as H2S)
Liquid Chromotography
Concentration,
mg/sm3
2.2
2.4
not detected
not detected
not detected
MATE
Comparison
Value
mg/sm3
M£Gsa
Category
Number
1
15
15
15
53
MEGsa
Category
Number
MATE0
Value,
mg/sm3
min. = 32
3
375
435
15
Min. MATE
Value in
Category
Ratio
/Cone. Found
\ M^
0.07
0.8-
b
Ratio
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated aliphatics
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated aromatics
Heterocyclic N, 0, S
compounds
Sulfides, disulfides
Nitriles
Ethers
Aldehydes, ketones
Nitroaromatics
Alcohols
Amines
Phenols
Esters, amides
Mercaptans
Carboxylic acids
Sulfoxides
GRAV cone, in sampled gas 1.2—2.2 mg/sm3
TCO cone, in sampled gas 0—0.1 mg/sm3
INSUFFICIENT
ORGANIC MASS
NO
LIQUID
CHROMATOGRAPHY
aMEG = Multimedia Environmental Goals.
bMATE = Minimum Acute Toxicity Effluent.
8-243
-------
TABLE 30. ESTIMATED RELATIVE HAZARD OF COKE BY-PRODUCT PLANT SOURCES
00
rs>
Source l«|titen
Rate Per My
Coal Fed
Operation laisslon
Source
lar processing
decanter vapor IS sen
dewatering/
storage vapor 8. 1 sea
pritury cooler
comlensate
tank vapor 1.2 sea
distillation
product storage
vapor 0.02 tea
AMMO la processing
excess aavanla
llquur 102 f
Final cooler and
napthalene handl-
coollng lower for
contact cooler,
gai. 2.107 sea
iiapthalene sepa- rate loo low to
ralor vapor Mature
naplhalene dryer
vapor 2. 1 sea
tight oil recovery
uastewater (wash
oil, sludge) 70-160 I
11 glil oil
storage vapor 11 1 sea
Wastewaler
biolredtaeiit
plant
elflJent 11S-900 I
blotr eilHtfiil
plant
ilutlije 1.2 kg
IOIAI
NO: Not deteralnedi NTO: Not
Ratios of Concentrations* to MMC Values
((Mined
llglil Aroaatlcs Heavy Organic t
(BIX) including CNA's NMj
2,410 SI9 HO
22. 1 41 NO
1.74S NO MB
110 I.O&6 ' NU
Nut an ealsslon - treated In btotrealaent
b 3 7.4 NO
1.&67 3.462 NO
as llaiard Units, HU)
Gaseous S '
Coeyounds Cyanides Chenols
194 NO 0.6
N10 HID 8.7
222 NIB NO
NO NIB 49
plant
0.02 1.4 0.02
142 NO M
lota) lotal
Haiard Hazard Noreial-
Hnits Units (ted
Per ten, fur Mg Relative
I, or kg Coal Haiard
Bipitenyl t
Quinollne
22.1 1.166 b.ObB 0.016
2.1 68 6.8 aO
ND 1.967 2.400 0.017
NO 7.215 140 0.001
0.08 21.2 49,000 0.149
NO S.229
Saaple results unreasonable and not representative '
Not an ealssion - treated In blutreataenl
146 NO NO
02 77 NA.
MD lb,3bO NO
p 1 ant
2.6 NO NO
NO NA 21.4
NO NO 3?0
ND 149 1.900 0.028
NO 98.6 61,000 0414
NO IS, 670 19,000 0 )3b
140.497
detected; NA: Cither coaceotraltoa ur HATE value not available
a: For concentration ranges, the Mdlan was used ' .
-------
TABLE A-4. AROMATIC ANALYSIS
Froth Flotation Sample (ppm)
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
m & p Xylene
o Xylene
Ons He
Bulb 1
1814.8
162.9
NA
NA
NA
Bulb 2
1612.9
136.1
NA
NA
NA
RTI
SS can
914.7
82.9
0.5
14.4
3.7
TABLE A-28. AROMATIC ANALYSIS
Onsite Analysis of Firval Cooling
Tower (ppm)
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
m & p Xylene
o Xylene
Onsite
Bulb 1
5.3
---
NA
NA
NA
Bulb 2
4; 7
___
NA
NA
NA
RTI
SS can
4:6
---
•— —
^^^
TABLE A-87. AROMATIC ANALYSIS
Tar Storage Tank (ppn)
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
m & p Xylene
o Xylene
Onsite
Bulb 1
20.6
5.6
NA
NA
NA
Bulb 2
20.0
5.5
NA
NA
NA
RTI
SS can
20.0
5.4
2.5
1.2
8-245
-------
TABLE A-109. AROMATIC ANALYSIS
Tar Decanter Tank (ppm)
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
a & p Xylene
o Xylene
Bulb 1
2190.7
191.5
NA
NA
NA
Ons ite
Bulb 2
2139. 1
177.9
NA
NA
NA
RTI
SS can
2395.6
214. 7
1.4
33.3
7.4
TABLE A-150. AROMATIC ANALYSIS
Light Oil Storage Tank (ppm)
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
m & p Xylene
o Xylene
Bulb 1
306.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
Ons ite
Bulb 2
296.3
8.5
NA
NA
NA
RTI
SS can
358.3
10.6
__«
—
— — —
TABLE A-152. AROMATIC ANALYSIS
Chemical Storage Tank (ppm)
Onsite
Bulb 1
Bulb 2
RTI
SS can
Benzene 97.4
Toluene 68.5
Ethyl benzene NA
m & p Xylene NA
o Xylene NA
104.9
69.5
NA
NA
NA
99.5
70.5
5.3
40.0
10.8
8-246
-------
TABLE A-173. AROMATIC ANALYSIS
Coke Oven Gas (ppm)
Benzene
Toluene
Ethyl benzene
m & p Xylene
o Xylene
Bulb 1
6195.5
437.0
NA
HA
NA
Ons ite
Bulb 2
6421. 0
248.0
NA
NA
NA
RTI
SS can
1667.2
67.8
013
4.4
0.7
TABLE A-174. AROMATIC ANALYSIS
Primary Cooler Condensate Samples
(ppm)
Benzene
To! uene
Ethyl benzene
m & p Xylene
o Xylene
Onsite
Bulb 1 Bulb 2
1565.6 .
160.8
NA
NA
NA
RTI
SS can
1653.4
178.1
1.2
37.7
9.7
TABLE A-180. AROMATIC ANALYSIS
Upwind Ambient Trailer Location (pp»)
Onsite RTI
Bulb 1 Bulb 2 SS can
Benzene 0.6 0.7
Toluene —
Ethyl benzene NA
m & p Xylene NA
o Xylene NA
8-247
-------
TABLE A-194. AROMATIC ANALYSIS
Downwind Ambient Chem Lab Site
Onsite RTI
Bulb 1 Bulb 2 SS can
Benzene 1.3 0.3 —
Toluene ' ~~~ ~~~ ~~~
Ethyl benzene NA NA ---
n & p Xylene NA NA
o Xylene NA NA
•8-248
-------
TABLE A-3. FROTH FLOTATION SEPARATOR SAMPLE
Plant Name: United States Steel—Coke By-Product Plant
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Date: 12/12/77
Test Performed By: F. 0. Phoenix, E. E. Stevenson
Run Number: 1
Sampling Location: Wemco Separator
Pre Leak Test: 0.04
Post Leak Test: 0.04
Test Time:
Start: 10:15
Finish: 14:25
Meter Volume (c.f.):
Start: 630.59
Finish: 1680.24
Volume of Gas Sampled: 1049.65 c.f.
1011.29 scf
Average Gas Temperature ("F)
Ambient: 54"
Sampling Location: 54°
XAD-2 Resin: 54°
Meter Box: 85°
Comments:
U No condensate collected. .
' Sampling performed in one of sixteen 8" x 50" ooemngs In
top of separator.
8-249
-------
CD
TABLE A-5. MATE COMPARISON VALUES, FROTH FLOTATION SEPARATOR, XAD-2 RESIN
Preliminary Concentrate LCI LC2 LC3 LC4 LCS
LC6 LC7 £
Total organ Us mg/sm' 649 474 0.0(10.9) 419 .(423) -7.0(14) 0.87(6.1) 42(47) 0.0(3.5) 0.0(7.0) 469(512)
TCO, mg 18.538 13.175 0.0 12.000 200 25 1.200
0.0 0.0 13.425
GRAy. my 40 394.S 0.0(312) 0.0(100) 0.0(200) 0.0(150) 0.0(150) 0.0(100) 0.0 (200) 0.0 (1.212)
Catc'jory H»Tt comparison valwr, mg/M**
Aliphatic hydrocarbons (10.9)
Ualogunated aliphatic* (1.1)
Aromatic hydrocarbons (3.49) (7.00) (5.241 (S.24)
Halogenated aromatic* (0.35) (0.70) (0.52)
Helerocyclic H. 0, S (0.52) (0.52)
compounds
Sulfldes, dtsul fides 0.52 0.52
Nitrlles 0.52 0.52
Ethers (3.49) (7.00) 0.52 0,52
Aldehydes, ketones (10.9) (7.00) i 5.24 5.24
Nitroaromatlcs 0.52
Alcohols 5.24
Amines 0.52
Phenols, halo and nitrophenols 5.24
Esters, amides (10.9) (3.49) (7.00) (5.24) 5.24
Hercaptans
Carboxylic acids
Sulfoxides
e.e no. »>
0.0 <1.1)
(3.49) (7.00) 0.0 Ml. 6)
0.0 (1.57
0.0 (1.04)
0.0
0.6
3.49 (7.00) 0.0
i 3.49 (7.00) 0.0
0.35 0.0
i0.3S (7.00) 0.0
0.35 (0.70) 0.0
10.35 0.0
i3.49 7.00 0.0
<0.35 0.70 0.0
10.35 0.70 0.0
(0.35) (0.70 0.0
1.04
1.04
22.0
38.9
0.87
12.6
2.09
5.59
42.4
1.05
1.05
1.05
NOTE: Values in parentheses are GRAV mass before subtraction of blank. The presence of GRAV mass in the original sample It shown by the Preliminary
and Concentrate samples. The HATE Comparison Value is based on tha GRAV mass In the 1C cut divided by the gas sample volume. For compound classes
,-i,,.., ..,i..» i, inn „„. „* n— i:o*u concentration. For compound classes expected" but not identified by IR. the HATE
indicated by IR, the HATE comparison value is 100 percent of the
Comparison Value is 10 percent of the GRAV concentration.
NOTE: MATE values are those 1n effect in January 1979.
-------
TABLE A-15. MATE COMPARISON VALUES, FROTH FLOTATION SEPARATOR, CANISTER RINSE
00
U1
Preliminary
Total organics mg/sm3 29.8
TCO, mg 360
GRAV, mg 493
•
Category
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated aliphatics
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated aroma tics
Iteterocyclic N.O.S
compounds
Sulfides, disuUides
Nitriles
Ethers
Aldehydes, ketones
Ni troaromatlcs
Alcohols
Amines
Phenols, halo and nitrophenols
Esters, amides
Mercaptans
Carboxylic acids
Sul fox ides
Concentrate LCI LC2 LC3 LC4
6.1 0.82 0.53 0.53 0.17
0.0 2.0 0.4 0.0
174 23.4 15.1 14.7 4.9
MATE comparison value,
0.82
0.08
0.53 0.51 0.17
0!05 0.05 0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.17
LC5
0.13
0.0
3.7
mg/sm3*
0.13
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.13
0.01
0.01
0.13
0.13
0.13
0.13
LC6
0.86
1.4
23.2
0.81
0.81
0.08
0.08
0.81
0.08
0.81
0.08
0.08
0.08
LC7
0.18
0.0
5.3
0.18
0.18
0.02
0.18
0.02
0.18
0.02
0.02
0.02
L
3.22
3.8
90.3
0.82
0.08
2.33
0.12
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.15
1.00
0.09
0.23
1.29
0.23
1.12
0.10
0.10
0.10
NOTES: The MATE Comparison Value to based on the GRAV mass in the LC cut divided by the gas sample volume. For
compound classes indicated by IR, the MATE comparison value is 100 percent of the GRAV concentration. For compound
classes expected 6S but not identified by IR, the MATE Comparison Value is 10 percent of the GRAV concentration.
NOTE: MATE values are those In effect 1n January 1979.
-------
TABLE A-25. CYANIDE GAS TRAIN DATA
Run I 1 2
Final Cooler Final Cooler
Sampling Location Cooling.Tower Cooling Towet
Volume Metered
(scf) 0.732 0.962.
Catch (CN")
(mgms) 1.92 2.16
Concentration
ppm 82.4 70.5
ugms/scm 92,618 70,284
8-252
-------
TABLE A-26. GAS TRAIN DATA SHEET
Run #1
Plant Name: U.S. Steel
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Sampling Location: Final cooling tower
Operator: B. Hawks
Date: 13 December 1977
Test Time:
Start: 0915.00
Finish: 0945.00
Meter Volume:
Start: 066.560
Finish: 067.286
Volume Sampled: 0.732 scf
AH Setting: 2 scfh
Gas Temperature at Meter Box:
Start: 56
Finish: 56
Ambient Temperature:
Start: 52
Finish: 52
Barometric Pressure: 29.50
Comments:
Gas train bubbling-through 0
-------
TABLE A-27. GAS TRAIN DATA SHEET
Run n
Plant Name: U.S. Steel
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Sampling Location: Final cooling tower
Operator: B. Hawks
Date: 13 December 1977
Test Time:
Start: 1015.00
Finish: 1045.00
Meter Volume:
Start: 067.700
Finish: 068.646
Volume sampled: 0.962 scf
AH Setting: 2 scfh
Gas Temperature at Meter Box:
Start: 56'
Finish: 60°
Arajaient Temperature:
Start: 52"
Finish: 52*
Barometric Pressure: 29.50
Comments:
Gas train bubbling through 60 ml, 0.5M NaOH
8-254
-------
TABLE A-29. SASS TRAIN DATA SHEET
Plant Name: U.S. Stael
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Date: 12/13/77
Test Performed 3y: F. H. Phoenix, E. E. Stevenson
Run Number: 2
Sampling Location: Final Cooler Cooling Tower
Pre Leak Test: 0.00
Post Leak Test: 0.02
Test Time:
Start: 9:00
Finish: 12:45
Meter Volume (c.f.):
Start: 632.58
Finish: 1583.15
Volume of Gas Sampled: 1000.57 c.f.
974.75 scf.
Average Gas Temperature (8F)
Ambient: 53°
Sampling Location:
XAO-2 Resin: 57'
Metar Box: 79°
Comments:
1. No condensate collected
2. Used 30' Teflon line as probe, ran from top of tower to XAD-2
module
3. Sampling performed in 1 of 2 ~8' diameter outlets - velocity
taken from fan data
4. Also ran two gas train runs and took hot well and cold well water
samples
8-255
-------
TABLE A-30. MATE COMPARISON VALUES, FINAL COOLER COOLING TOWER, XAD-2 RESIN
00
01
Preliminary Concentrate LCI LCZ LCI LC4 LC5
Totil oryanics mg/sm' 222 61 0.0 (0.82) 37.0 (38.0) 0.76 (1.41) 1.20 (1.63) 0.98 (1.41)
TCO, 019 6,066 1.410 0.0 1,020 21 33 27
GRAV. my 60 282 0.0 (22. 5) 0.0 (30.0) 0.0 (18.0) 0.0 (12.0) 0.0 (2.12)
Category HATE comparison
Aliphatic hydrocarbons (0.82) (1.08)
Halogenated aliphatic; (0.08)
Aromatic hydrocarbons (1.08) (0.65) (0.43 (0.43) (1
tlaloyenated aromatic* 10.11) (0.06) (0.04
lleterocychc N, 0, S (0.04 (0.04)
compounds
Sulfldcs, dlsulfides (0.04 (0 64)
NitrllfS (0.04 (0.04)
Ethurs (0.65) (0.43) (0.43)
Aldehydes, ke tones (0.6S) (0.43) • (0.43) )
Nitroaromatics 1 0.04 i 0
Alcohols 0.04 1
Amines 0.04 0
Phono I t, halo and nitrophenols 0
Esters, amides (0.65) (0.43) (0.43) 1
Mercaptans 0
Carboxylic acids 0
Sulfoxides 0
LC6 LC7 I
6.74 (8.04) 0.0 (0.87) 46.7
186 0.0 1.287
0.0 (36.0) 0.0 (24.0) 0.0
value, iig/M'*
0.0
0.0
.30) (0.87) 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
(0.87) 0.0 I
.30) (fl.87) 0.0 (
.131 0.0
.30 0.081 0.0
.13 0.08 0.0
.13 8. 08i 0.0
.30 0.87 0.0
.13 0.08 0.0
.13 O.OBi 0.0
.13 0.08) 0.0
152.2]
[154)
t.M)
0.08)
*7«
0.21
O.OB!
! 0.081
0.08
2.38)
3.68]
0.17
.42)
1.42
0.21
3.68
0.21
0.21
0.21
NOTES: The MATE Comparison Value is based on the GRAV mass in the LC cut divided by the gas sample volume. For compound
classes indicated by 1R, the MATE Comparison Vulue is 100 percent of the GRAV concentration. For compound classes expected6 s
but not identified by IR, the MATE Comparison Value is 10 percent of the GRAV concentration.
Values in parentheses are GRAV mass before subtraction of blank. The presence of GRAV mass in the original sample is
shown by the Preliminary and Concentrate samples.
NOTE: MATE values are those in effect in January 1979.
-------
TABLE A-86. SASS TRAIN DATA SHEET
Plant Name: U.S. Steel
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Date: 12/13/77
Test Performed By: F. J. Phoenix, E. E. Stevenson
Run Number 3
Sampling Location: Tar Storage Tank
Pre Leak Test: 0.02
Post Leak Test: 0.05
Test Time:
Start: 14:55
Finish: 15:44
Meter Volume (c.f.):
Start: 685.67
Finish: 889.97
Volume of Gas Sampled: 202.28 c.f. *
199.06 scf.
Average Gas Temperature (aF)
Ambient: 60°
Sampling Location: 85V
XAD-2 Resin: 80°
Mater Box: 70°
Comments:
1. Naphthalene condensed on XAO-2 Module.
We had to take module apart and clean off Naphthalene during
run.
* 2.02 c.f. was subtracted from sample volume due to leak check
during run.
8-257
-------
TABLE A-88. MATE COMPARISON VALUES, VAPOR ABOVE TAR STORAGE TANK, XAD-2 RESIN
ro
in
oo
Preliminary
Total organics mg/sm1 1,192
TCO, mg 6.620
GKAV, mcj 100
Category
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
llalogenated aliphatics
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Ualogenated aroma tics
Heterocyclic N, 0, S
compounds
Sulfides, disulfides
Nitrites
Ethers
Aldehydes, ke tones
Nitroaromatics
Alcohols
Amines
Phenols, halo and nltrophenols
Esters, amides
Mercaptans
Carboxylic acids
Sul fox ides
Concentrate LCI LC2 LC3 LC4
1.530 76.3 1,780 140 37.4
6.090 430 10,040 836 191
2,540 0.0 20 0.0 20
MATE comparison value, mg/sn
0.0
0.0
3.55 0.0 3.55
0.36 0.0 0.36
0.36
0.36
0.36
3.55
3.55
3.55
LC5
24.11
96
40
i*
7.09
0.71
Q.71
0.71
7.09
7.09
0.71
0.71
0.71
7.09
LC6 LC7
192 10.63 2
1.080 0.0 12
0.0 60
10.6
10.6
1.06
1.06
1.06
10.6
1.06
1.06
1.06
V
.270
.700
140
0.0
0.0
24.8
0.72
1.07
1.07
1.07
10.6
21.2
0.71
1.77
1.77
1.06
21.2
1.06
1.06
1.06
NOTE: The MATE Comparison Value is based on the GKAV mass in the LC cut divided by the gas sample volume. For compound
classes indicated by IR, the MATE comparison value is 100 percent of the GftAV concentration. For compound classes
expected611 but not identified by IR, the MATE Comparison Value is 10 percent of the GRAV concentration.
NOTE: MATE values are those in effect in January 1979.
-------
TABLE A-98. MATE COMPARISON VALUES, VAPOR ABOVE TAR STORAGE TANK, CANISTER RINSE
Preliminary Concentrate LCI
Total organics rng/smj 293 132 5.90
TCO, HHJ 1,545 24.2
GRAV, mg 109 (spill) 743 9.10
Category
Aliphatic hydrocarbons 1.6
Halogenated allphatlcs 0.16
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated aromatics
Heterocyclic N,0,S
compounds
Sulfides, disulfides
Nitriles
Ethers 1.6
Aldehydes, ketones
Nitroaromatics
Alcohols
Ainines
Phenols, halo and nitrophenols
Esters, amides 1.6
Mercaptans
Carboxyllc acids
Su If oxides
LC2
70.1
364
31.5
MATE
5.6
0.56
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
5.6
LC3
81.6
453
7.28
comparison
1.3
0.13
1.3
1.3
1.3
I.C4 LC5 LC6 LC7
0.86 0 4.3 0.0
2.42 0.0 24.2 0.0
2.42 0.0 0.0 0.0
value, mg/smj*
0.43
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.43
0.43
0.43
T.
162
868
50.3
1.6
0.16
7.33
0.73
0.04
0.04
0.04
8.93
7.33
0.0
5.6
0.0
5.6
8.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
NOTE: The MATE Comparison Value Is based on the GRAV mass In the LC cut divided by the gas sample volume. For com-
pound classes Indicated by IR, the MATE comparison value Is 100 percent of the GRAV concentration. For compound
classes expected'5 but not Identified by IR. the MATE Comparison Value Is 10 percent of the GRAV concentration.
NOTE: MATE values are those 1n effect In January 1979.
-------
TABLE A-108. SASS TRAIN DATA SHEET
Plant Name: U.S. Steel
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Date: 12/14/77
Test Performed By: F. J. Phoenix, £. E. Stevenson
Run Number: 4
Sampling Location: Tar Decanter Tank
Pre Leak Test: 0.00
Post Leak Test: 0.02
Test Time:
Start: 9:00
Finish: 10:40
Meter Volume (c.f.):
Start: 893.59
Finish: 1191.67
Volume of Gas Sampled: 298.08 c.f.
287.41 scf.
Average Gas Temperature (*F)
Ambient: 61*
Sampling Location: 170°
XAD-2 Resin: 100°
Meter Box: 80°
Comments:
1. Used ice bath at sampling location to cool gases before passing
through XAO-2 Resin.
2. Ran for * 3-4 minutes when reaction took place in first impinger
Ammonia reacted with hydrogen peroxide - We decided to continue
test without first impinger.
3. Sampling performed in one of 4 vents. Tank was leaking vapor in
front.
8-260
-------
TABLE A-1101 MATE COMPARISON VALUES, TAR DECANTER VAPOR, XAD-2 RESIN
oo
cn
Preliminary Concentrate
Total organics mg/sm1 6,340 6,820
TCO. mg 31,520 33,680
GRAV, Mg 20,080 21,840
Category
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
llalogenated allphatics
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated aromatics
lleterocyclic N.O.S
compounds
Sul fides, dlsulfldes
Nitrlles
Ethers
Aldehydes, ketones
Nitroaroniatlcs
Alcohols
Amines
Phenols, halo and nltrophenols
Esters, amides
Mercaptans
Carboxyllc acids
Sul fox ides
LCI LC2 LC3 LC4 LC5 LC6
23.1 1.470 1,370 74 9.2 129
0.0 11,025 11,175 600 75 600
188 900 0.0 0.0 0.0 450
MATE comparison value, mg/sm3*
23.1 11.0
2.3
11.0 55.2
11.0
11.0 55.2
55.2
23.1 11.0 55.2
LC7 E
0.0 3.080
0.0 23,475
0.0 1,540
133
2.3
165
11
0.0
0.0
0.0
165
55.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
188
0.0
0.0
0.0
NOTE: The MATE Comparison Value 1s based on the GRAV mass In the LG cut divided by the gas sample volume. For com-
pound classes indicated by IR, the MATE comparison value Is 100 percent of the GRAV concentration. For compound
classes expected65 but not Identified by IR. the MATE Comparison Value Is 10 percent of the GRAV concentration.
NOTE: J4ATE values are those in effect In January 1979.
-------
TABLE A-120. MATE COMPARISON VALUES, TAR DECANTER VAPOR, CANISTER RINSE
00
en
Preliw4nary .
Total organics mg/sm J 1,220
TCO, mg 8,190
GRAV, mg 1.760
Category
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated aliphatics
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated aroma tics
Heterocyclic N.O.S
compounds
Sulfides, disulfides
NUriles
Ethers
Aldehydes, ke tones
Nitroaromatics
Alcohols
Amines
Phenols, halo and nltrophenols
Esters, amides
Mercaptans
Carboxyllc acids
Sulfoxldes
Concentrate LCI
' 800 7.68
0.0
'6,500 62.5
• 7.68
0.77
7.68
7.68
7.68
7.68
LC2 LC3
972 10.7
5,520 62.3
2,390 25.0
MATE comparison
294 3.07
29.4 0.31
3.07
3.07
3.07
LC4
1.54
0.0
12.5
value,
1.54
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
1.54
1.54
1.54
LC5
4.61
0.0
37.5
wg/sm1*
4.61
0.46
0.46
0.46
4.6
4.6
0.46
0.46
0.46
4.6
LC6
40.7
31.9
12.5
1.54
1.54
1.54
0.15
0.15
0.15
0.15
1.54
0.15
0.15
0.15
LC7
3.07
0.0
25.0
3.07
3.07
3.07
0.31
0.31
0.31
3.07
0.31
0.31
0.31
E
1,040
5.900
2,565
7.68
0^-»
.17
308
29.9
0.61
0.61
0.61
18.4
21.5
0.61
0.92
3.99
0.46
21.5
0.46
0.46
0.46
NOTE: The MATE Comparison Value is based on the GRAV mass In the LC cut divided by the gas sample volume. For com-
pound classes indicated by 1R, the MATE comparison value is 100 percent of the GRAV concentration. For compound
classes expected65 but not identified by IR, the MATE Comparison Value Is 10 percent of the GRAV concentration.
NOTE: MATE values are those in effect in January 1979.
-------
TABLE A-130. MATE COMPARISON VALUES, TAR DECANTER VAPOR, CONDENSATE EXTRACT, pH 2
00
en
(JL)
Preliminary Concentrate
Total organics rag/sm1 207 176
TCO, mg 1,545 923
GRAV, mg 138 507
Category
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated aliphatics
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Halogenated arontatics
Heterocyclic N.O.S
compounds
Sulfides, disulfides
Nitriles
Ethers
Aldehydes, ke tones
Nitroaromatics
Alcohols
Amines
Phenols, halo and nitrophenols
Esters, amides
Mercaptaris
Carboxylic acids
Su If oxides
LCI LC2 LC3 LC4
0.61 20.6 19.4 5.65
0.0 108 74 38
5.0 60 84 8.0
MATE comparison value,
0.61
0.06
7.37 10.3 0.98
0.74 1.03 0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.98
0.98
0.98
0.98
LC5
7.12
42
16
mg/sm
1.96
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
1.96
0.20
1.96
0.20
1.96
1.96
LC6
96.8
596
192
3*
23.6
2.36
2.36
2.36
2.36
23.6
2.36
2.36
23.6
2.36
LC7 F,
0.0 150
0.0 858
0.0 365
0.61
0.06
44.2
2.07
0.30
0.30
0.30
0.30
5.3
2.56
5.3
2.56
5.3
5.3
2.36
23.6
2.36
NOTE: The HATE Comparison Value Is based on the GRAV MSS In the LC cut divided by the gas sample volume. For com-
pound classes indicated by 1R. the MATE comparison value 1s 100 percent of the GRAV concentration. For compound
classes expected*5 but not identified by IR, the NATE Comparison Value is 10 percent of the GRAV concentration.
NOTE: MATE values are those in effect In January 1979.
-------
TABLE A-140. MATE COMPARISON VALUES, TAR DECANTER VAPOR, CONDENSATE EXTRACT, pH 12
00
ro
Preliminary
Total organ 1cs nig/sin* 59
TCO, ing 345
GRAV, mg 138
Category
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
llalogenated allphatlcs
Aromatic hydrocarbons
llalogenated aroinatlcs
lleterocyclic N.O.S
compounds
Sulfldes, dlsulfldes
Nltrlles
Ethers
Aldehydes, ke tones
N1 troaromatlcs
Alcohols
Amines
Phenols, halo and nltrophenols
Esters, amides
Mercaptans
Cdrboxyl ic acids
Sul fox ides
Concentrate .LCI LC2 LC3
45 0.46 0.60 0.61
338 0.0 6.5 3.0
26 3.75 0.0 2.0
MATE comparison
0.46
0.05
0.24
0.02
0.24
0.24
0.24
LC4 LC5
0.43 2.27
3.5 15.fi
0.0 3.0
value, mg/sm1*
0.37
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.04
0.37
0.04
0.04
0.37
0.37
LC6
26.8
208
10.0
1.23
1.23
0.12
0.12
0.12
1.23
0.12
1.23
0.12
0.12
0.12
LC7
0.12
0.0
1.0
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.12
0.01
0.01
0.01
r.
31.5
236
16.8
0.46
O.OS
1.96
0.02
0.04
0.04
0.04
1.63
0.85
0.16
0.17
1.61
0.13
1.96
0.13
0.13
0.13
NOTE: The MATE Comparison Value is based on the GRAV mass In the LC cut divided by the gas sample volume. For com-
pound classes indicated by IR, the MATE comparison value is 100 percent of the GRAV concentration. For compound
classes expected65 but not identified by IR, UK? MATE Comparison Value is 10 percent of the GRAV concentration.
NOTE: MATE values are those in effect in January 1979.
-------
TABLE A-151. SASS TRAIN DATA SHEET
Plant Name: U.S. Steel
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Date: 12/15/77
Test Performed By: F. H. Phoenix, E. E. Stevenson, T. Allen
Run Number: 5
Sampling Location: Chemical Oil Storage Tank
Pre Leak Test: 0.00
Post Leak Test: 0.08
Test Time:
Start: 8:41
Finish: 11:50
Meter Volume (c.f.):
Start: 361.52
Finish: 870.40
Volume of Gas Sampled: 505.48 c.f.*
503.86 scf.
Average Gas Temperature (°F)
Ambient: 50C
Sampling Location: 110°
XAD-2 Resin: 80°
Meter Box: 65°
Comments:
1. Naphthalene was condensing on inside of XAD-2 Module and probe.
* 3.40 cf subtracted due to leak test.
8-265
-------
TABLE A-153. MATE COMPARISON VALUES, VAPOR ABOVE CHEMICAL OIL TANK, XAD-2 RESIN
00
en
Preliminary Concentrate LCI LC2 LC3 IC4 LC5
ICG LC7
loUl oryunUs wy/sm' 2.110 2.420 10. S (J6.il) 522(543) 020(041) 0.0(21.0)7.01(21.0) 210 (23H) 0.0(21.0)1.3/0(1.520)
TCO my 26.730 2S.UOO 150 7,450 8,1150 0.0 100
I1KAV. my 3.360 5.730 0.0 (3/5) 0.0 (300) 0.0 (300) 0.0 (300) 0.0 (200)
3.000 0.0 19.550
0.0(200) 0.0(300) 0.0(2.1/0)
Cateijory HATE comparison value, mg/sm'*
Aliphatic hydrocarbons (26.3)
lldliujeiidted dli|ilidtlis (2.63)
Aromatic hydrocarbons (21.0) (21.0) (21.0) (14.0)
llalogenated arimiatics (2.1) (2.10) (2.10)
Helerocyclic N, 0, S (2.10) (1.4)
Suit ides, disul fides (2.10) (1.4)
Nit. lies (2.10) (1.4)
liners (21.0) (21.0) (21.0) (14.0)
Aldehydes, ketunes (21.0) (21.0) (14.0)
Nilroaroiiidlics (1.4)
Alcohols (1.4)
Amines (1.4)
Phenols., halo and nitrophenols
tslers, amides (21.0) (21.0) (14.0)
Mercai'tans
Carhoxylic acids
Sul fox ides
0.0 (26.3)
0.0 (2.63)
(2U.O) (21.0) 0.0 (126)
0.0 (6.3)
0.0 (3.5)
0.0
0.0
128.0) (21.0) 0.0
28.0) (21.0) 0.0
2.8) 0.0
3.5
3.5
126
105
4.2
2.8) (2.10) 0.0 (6.3)
2.8) 2.10 0.0
2.8) (2.10 0.0
?8.0) (21.0 0.0
2.8 12.10 0.0
(2.8 12.10 0.0
(2.8 (2.10 0.0
6.3
4.9
105
4.9
4.9)
4.9)
NOTI: Values in parciUheses are GRAV IMSS before subtraction of blank. The presence of GRAV mass in the original sample is shown by the Preliminary
U>*. Iho MATE Com|jarisori Value is based on the GRAV mass in the LC cut divided Ity the gas sample volume. For compound classes
MidiidU'd by IK, the MAU coiH|)arison value is 100 percent of the GKAV concentration. For compound classes expected" but net identified by IK, the MAU
Coui|Mi'isoii Value is 10 pcrti'iit of the GKAV concentration.
NOTE: MATE values are those in effect in January 1979.
-------
TABLE A-163. MATE COMPARISON VALUES, VAPOR ABOVE CHEMICAL OIL TANK, CANISTER RINSE
00
r>o
en
Prel iminary
Total organ ics mg/sm3 802
TCO, nuj 2,4fM)
GRAV, UKJ U,%0
Category
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
lldloyenated aliphatics
Aromatic hydrocarbons
llalogenated aroma tics
Heterocyelic N, 0, S
compounds
Sulfides, disulfides
NHriles
Ethers
Aldehydes, ketones
Ni troa roiud tics
Alcohols
Ami ncs
Phenols, halo and ni trophc-nols
tsters, amides
Mercaptans
Carboxylic acids
Su If ox Ides
Concentrate LCI LC2 LC3
1,550 27 1,584 298
3,740 16,000 4,260
22,120 122 6,610 0.0
MATE comparison value
8.54
0.85
463
46.3
8.54
8.54
8.54
LC4 LC5 LC6
51.4 0.0 72.2
0.0 0.0 1,030
734 0.0 0.0
, mg/sm3*
51.4
5.14
5.14
5.14
5.14
51.4
51.4
51.4
.
LC7 Y.
0.0 2,?HO
0.0 25.030
0.0 7,470
8.54
0.85
514
51.4
5.14
5.14
5.14
59.9
59.9
,
59.9
NOTE: The MATE Comparison Value is based on the GRAV MSS In the 1C cut divided by the gas sample volume. For compound
classes indicated by IR, the NATE comparison value Is 100 percent of the GRAV concentration. For compound classes
expected** but not identified by IR, the NATE Comparison Value is 10 percent of the GRAV concentration.
NOTE: HATE values are those In effect 1n January 1979.
-------
TABLE A-175. AMBIENT DATA SHEET
Plant Name: U.S. Steel
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Operator: Tom Allen
Time of Sample: 15:00 '12/12 to 15:00 12/13
Station Number: 123
Metered Volume cu. meter 0.258 0.275
Cyanide Catch (CN~) vgras 16.3 1.1
Concentration ppm 0.056 0.004
ugms/std m3 62.6 4.0
Wind Direction:
Wind came out of the southeast for the 24 hour sample period at
approximately 5 mph.
Comments:
Station 1 •- - Chemical Lab.
2 - Mule Barn
3 - Railroad tracks
Station 2 was not in operation due to power problems at sample
location.
8-268
-------
TABLE A-176. AMBIENT DATA SHEET
Plant Name:
Location:
Operator:
Time of Sample:
U.S. Steel
Birmingham, Alabama
Tom Allen
15:00 12/13 to 15:00 12/14
Station Number
Metered Volume cu. meter
Cyanide Catch (CN~) ygms
Concentration ppm
ygms/std
1
0.280
22.0
0.069
78.1
2 3
0.280
2.5
0.008
8.9
Wind Direction:
Wind out of Southeast for = 10 hours at a 9 mph.
Wind out of Southwest for = 5h hours at * 6 mph.
Wind out of Northwest for = 8H hours at * 5 mph.
Comments:
Station #2 down due to power problems at sampling location.
ppm calculated assuming total cyanides (ClT) as HCN.
-------
TABLE A-177. AMBIENT DATA SHEET
Plant Name: U.S. Steel
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Operator: Tom Allen
Time of Sample: 15:00 12/14 to 15:00 12/15
Station Number: 123
Metered Volume cu. meter 0.289 0.215 0.2S9
Cyanide Catch (CN~) vgms 4.3 0.5 2.5
Concentration ppm 0.013 0.002 Q.COS
ugms/std m3 14.8 2.3 8.6
Wind Direction:
Wind from Northwest for 13 h. at * 5 mph.
North for 4 h. at = 3 mph; N.E. for 3 h. at s 3 mph; £ for ?\ h,
at = 3.mph; W for \h h.
Comments:
Wind direction varied during run: See Met. Station data sheet.
3-270
-------
TABLE A-178. AMBIENT DATA SHEET
Plant Name:
Location:
Operator:
U.S. Steel
Birmingham, Alabama
Tom Allen
Time of Sample: 15:00 12/15 to 12/16
Station Number:
Metered Volume cu. meter
Cyanide Catch (CN~) ygms
Concentration ppm
ygms/std m
1 2 3
0.289 0.215 0.289
5.8 1.0 1.5
0.018 0.004 0.005
20.0 4.6 5.2
Wind Direction:
Wind from West for 7 hours at = mph.
Wind from North for 9 hours at = 2 mph.
Wind from Southwest for 8 hours at ~ 7 mph.
Corranents:
Ambient stations were taken down at 18:00 on 12/15 - 3 hour samples
were not analyzed.
8-271
-------
TABLE A-179. SASS TRAIN DATA SHEET
Plant Name: U.S. Steel
Location: . Birmingham, Alabama
Date: 12/16/77
Test Performed By: F. J. Phoenix
Run Number: 7
Sampling Location: Upwind Ambient-Station ^3 Railroad tracks
Pre Leak Test: 0.01
Post Leak Test: 0.02
Test Time:
Start: 19:30
Finish: 22:36
Meter Volume (c.f.):
Start: 882.05
Finish: 1883.44
Volume of Gas Sampled 1001.39
978.06 scf.
Average Gas Temperature (8F)
Ambient 57°
Sampling Location: 57°
XAD-2 Resin: 57°
Meter Box: 74°
Comments:
1. Wind out of the Southwest.
8-272
-------
TABLE A-181. ' ORGANIC EXTRACT SUMMARY, UPWIND AMBIENT, XAD-2 RESIN
Total
organics ing/sin*
TCO, IIKJ
GRAV, IIKJ
Prel i ui i nary
'j.O
100
40
Concen trait.'
2.6
48
23
LCI
0.07
2.0
0.0
LC2
1.01
24.8
3.2
I.C3
0.32
7.2
1.6
LC4
0.0
0.0
0.0
LC'j
0.06
1.8
0.0
LC6
0.30
4.2
4.0
LC7
0. 19
0.0
5.2
\
1.95
40.0
14.0
Category
MATE comparison value, nig/SIM3*
Si-'
CO
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
llaloyenated aliphatics
Aromatic hydrocarbons
llalogenated aroma tics
lletcrocycl ic N, 0, S
compounds
Sulfides, disulfidiiS
Nitriles
Ethers
Aldehydes, kutones
Ni troaromatics
Alcohols
Amines
Plienols, halo and nltrophenols
Esters, amides
Mercaptans
Carboxylic acids
Sul fox ides
0.12
0.12 0.06 :).14
0.01 O.OOf.
0.14
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.14
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.19
0.19
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.19
0.02
0.02
0.02
0.12
0.0
0.32
O.O/
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.33
0.20
0.01
0.03
0.03
0.03
0.33
0.03
0.03
0.03
NOTE: The MATE Comparison Value is based on the GRAV mass in the LC cut divided by the gas sample volume. For compound
classes indicated by IR, the MATE comparison value is 100 percent of the GRAV concentration. For compound classes
expected65 but not Identified by IR, the MATE Comparison Value is 10 percent of the GRAV concentration.
NOTE: MATE values are those in effect 1n 1979.
-------
TABLE A-193. SASS TRAIN DATA SHEET
Plant Name: U.S. Steel
Location: Birmingham, Alabama
Date: 12/16/77
Test Performed By: F. J. Phoenix
Run Number: 6
Sampling Location: Downwind Ambient-Station *1 Chem. Lab,
Pre Leak Test: 0.02
Post Leak Test: 0.02
Test Time:
Start: 14:40
Finish: 18:30
Meter Volume (c.f.):
Start: 872.52
Finish: 1876.65
Volume of Gas Sampled: 1004.13 c.f.
972.27 scf.
Average Gas Temperature ("F)
.Ambient: 55*
Sampling Location: 55"
XAD-2 Resin: 55°
Meter Box: 75°
Comments:
1. Wind out of the Southeast.
8-274
-------
TABLE A-231. ORGANIC EXTRACT SUMMARY, BIOLOGICAL TREATMENT PLANT SLUDGE, pH 7 EXTRACT
00
tn
Totdl Organics , nu|/t
ICO, my
(JtAV. imi
Category
Aliphatic hydrocarbons.
lUluijenateU aliphatic;
Aromatic hydrocarbons
II a 1 oguna ted a roina tics
lleterocycl ic N, U, S compounds
SuUiifc'S. disuUidc-s
Nit riles
tlhers
Aldehydes, ke tones
NiLroiiroiudtics
Alcohols
Alll IIIC'S
Phenols, Iwlo dud nitrophenols
Liters, amides
Mcrcaptans
Ciirboxy) ic at ids
Sul f oxide;
l'i el iiiniu'i y ((ime'iidalc LCI LC7 LCI U1
iJJ.tl /.U 2. 1 O.LO 0.60 0.7
I )!> 3.0 0 (I 00
4"> W..O 16.0 3.6 4.4 1.6
HA It Comparison
2.1
• 0.2
2.1 0.5 0.6 0.2
0.05 0.06 0.02
0.02
ft. 02
0.02
0.6 0,02
0.6 '.. 0.2
0.2
0.6 0.2
Kb
0.05
0
0.4
Vdlue,
0.05
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.005
0.000
0.005
0.005
0 005
IC5
2.7
0
20. 8
mq/1
2.7
2.7
2.7
0.1
2.7
0.3
2.7
2.7
0.3
2.7
1 ( 7
0.3
0
2.4
0.3
0.3
0.1
0.03
0.03
0.03
0 03
' «>.!> •
0
4'j.;'
2.1
0.2
6.41>
0.13
0.025
0.025
0.025
3.32
3.5
0.30
3.00
0.3(1
3.2
3.5
0.3J
2.73
0.03
Ikilu: The MATE Comparison Value is based on the GRAY mass in the 1C cut divided by the sample volume. Tor compound classes indicated by IR, the
MAIL comparison value is 100 percent of I lie GRAV concentration, for compound cUses expected but not indicated by IR, the NATE comparison value is
10 percent of the GKAV concentratiou.
NOTE: MATE values are those in effect In 1979,
-------
STUDY NUMBER 9
-------
STUDY NUMBER 9
DATA
SOURCE:
FERROALLOY PROCESS
EMISSIONS MEASUREMENT
DATA
STATUS:
EPA-600/2-79-045, February 1979
AUTHORS:
CONTRACTOR:
J. L Rudolph, J. C. Harris,
Z. A. Grosser, and P. L Levins
Arthur D. Little, Inc.
Acom Park
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02140
PROJECT
OFFICER:
Larry D. Johnson
Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory
Office of Energy, Minerals, and Industry
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Research Triangle Park. NC 27711
9-1
-------
FERROALLOY PROCESS EMISSIONS MEASUREMENT
The stated purpose of this project was to "characterize and quantify
participate, organic, and inorganic chemical emissions in effluents from a
totally sealed metallurigical furnace at a ferroalloy production facility" in
Beauharnois, Quebec. Such furnaces are of special interest because they
may lower particulate emissions, but preliminary data had shown that these
furnaces might emit large quantities of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.
Quoting from the report, "The 72,000 KVA totally sealed furnace is contained
in a 15 m diameter by 8.8 m deep shell which has a air-cooled flat bottom.
The inner hearth diameter is 12.1 m, and the crucible depth in 6.3 m. Three
self-baking electrodes, 1.9 m diameter, are triangularly arranged at 4.75 m
center-to-center distances."
Figure 9-1 shows a diagram of the air pollution abatement equipment for
the furnace sampled in this study. Two sampling points were utilized in
this study. Samples of the gaseous effluent from the furnace were taken
using a SASS train and Level 1 gaseous grab sampling procedures downstream
of the venturi scrubber during silicomanganese production and upstream of
the scrubber (in. the bypass stacks) during ferromanganese production. These
two samples, upstream and downstream of the scrubber, were characterized as
shown in Table 9-1.
Table 9-1. Sample Characterization
Upstream of scrubber
(in bypass stacks) Downstream of scrubber
Pressure
Temperature
CO, %
H2 , %
02, %
C02, %
H20, %
Slightly negative
480° - 870° C
41
8
1
50
2
Positive (~ 51
32° - 49° C
41
8
1
50
Saturated
cm)
9-2
-------
UD
I
OJ
1. Bypass Stacks
2. Quenchers
3. Dust Separator
4. VerUuri Scrubber
5. Mist Eliminator
6. Fans
7. Recirculation Loop
8. Clean Gas Stack
9. Incinerator Ductwork
©
Figure 9-1. Gas cleaning system.
SOURCE: Reference 1: R. G. Ratzlaff, "Construction and Operation of a New
Ferromanganese Facility," paper presented at the 32nd Electric
Furnace Conference of the Metallurgical Society of AIME, Dec. 1974,
Pittsburgh.
-------
The upstream sample showed a high participate loading (68,000 mg/m3 or
17 kg/MWh), a very high level of organics including some species that are
possible carcinogens, and high levels of arsenic. The downstream sample
showed lower levels of all species of concern with particulate loading of
64 mg/m3 (or 0.016 kg/MWh) and an arsenic level of 0.5 mg/m3. The major
organic categories found in the downstream sample were simple aromatic
hydrocarbons and low molecular weight polycyclics. Because the two tests
were run during different production modes, a quantitative measure of ven-
turi scrubber efficiency cannot be made, but the test results do imply good
removal of particulates and polynuclear aromatics.
It was noted in the report that good agreement had been found between
the results of Level 1 organic analysis and GC/MS analysis for.specific
polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons.
Tables 9-2, 9-3, and 9-4 from the document identify the sample codes
used in this study.
9-4
-------
TABLE 9-2. SAMPLE SERIES I
Series
Process
Sampling Point
Volume of Gas Sampled
Silicomanganese
Outlet of Venturi Scrubber
32.12 mj
SASS Components
cyclone catch >10y
cyclone catch >3y
cyclone catch >lu
filter catch
probe and cyclone rinses
XAD-2 resin
sorbent nodule condensate
organic extract
lapinger solh #1
(including condensate
from sorbent module)
lapinger soln #2 and #3
Codes
IC10
IC3
IC1
IF
IPW
IX
ISC
I imp. 1
I imp. 23
\ IC310
j after combining
1 IC1F
) after combining
9-5
-------
TABLE 9-3. SAMPLE SERIES II
Scries
Process
Sampling Point
Volume of Gas Sampled
II
Ferromenfanese
Bypass-
1.36 mj
SASS Component*
cyclone catch >10y
cyclone catch >3p
cyclone catch >ly
filter catch
probe and cyclone rinses
XAD-2 resin
sorbent module eoadensate
organic extract
Impinger soln fl
(including eondensate
from sorbent module
Inpinger soln t2 and 13
Codes
IIC10
IIC3
IIC1
IIF
IIPW
IIX
IISC
II imp. 1
II imp. 23
IIC310
after combining
IIC1F
after combining
9-6
-------
TABLE 9-4. OTHER SAMPLES
Coal CL
Coke CK
Blank (methylene chloride) BM
Blank
(methylene chloride/methanol)
Solvent blank B
(ADL methylene chloride)
BMM
9-7
-------
LEVEL 1
9-8
-------
TABLE 9-5. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
TOTAL INORGANICS, SILICOMANGANESE SERIES
SAMPLE NO. SERIES I
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
2.5
2.0
0.20
11
1.2
*
0.001
0.03
0.19
0.04
0.32
0.03
0.14
0.032
0.20
0.21
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.34
0.072
0.27
0.13
1.1
2.7
2.1
4.0
3.2
MC
1.5
0.04
0.03
0.54
0.94
*
MC
0.57
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
0.2
5.5
2.6
21
6.8
MC
17
2.4
0.82
MC
1.2
7.2
MC
MC
MC
1.2
MC
MC
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
AT
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
MC
20
MC
0.15
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
1.4
0.07
17.
MC = Major component, >64 \*g/m2.
*Not quantified.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppm.
-------
TABLE 9-6. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
TOTAL INORGANICS, FERROMANGANESE SERIES
SAMPLE NO. SERIES II
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tin
Er
Ho
190
100
560
MC
3.000
*
1.2
2
5
30
6
20
30
Oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sin
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
50
20
50
30
140
180
70
6,100
400
MC
1,300
6,000
280
1,900
300
t
6,700
1,000
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
0,
3,000
80
560
140
12,000
MC
19,000
1,500
MC
280
3,600
MC
34,000
4,000
10,000
MC
MC
..Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
.5,200
800
7,700
50
MC
MC
MC
700
MC
870
10
1,300
MC = Major component,.>68,000
*Not quantified.
tlnternal standard.
'Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppm.
9-10
-------
TABLE 9-7. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SAMPLE NO. IC3 + 10
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
2.2
1.6
0.17
8.6
1.1
*
0.029
0.11
0.04
0.28
0.023
0.11
0.028
0.17
0.17
Oy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.28
0.057
0.23
0.11
1.03
2.4
2.0
2.8
2.3
MC
1.4
0.023
0.034
0.40
G.85
t
8.0
0.057
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
2.4
2.4
20
6.3
MC
16
0.11
0.45
22.0
1.1
6.3
12
16
2.8
0.74
MC
MC
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
• B
Be
Li
22
18
MC
0.057
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
1.0
0.051
14
MC = Major component.
*Not quantified.
flnternal standard.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppm.
-------
TABLE 9-8. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SAMPLE NO. IC1 + F
u
Th
Bi
Pb
n
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
-Er
Ho
0.15
0.18
0.012
0.78
0.069
*
<0.0006
0.016
<0.002
0'. 019
0.003
0.016
0.002
0.012
..0.019
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.028
0.006
0.016
0.009
0.066
0.14
0.066
0.75
0.34
HC
0.05
0.002
<0.001
0.034
0.028
t
MC
0.009
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn •
-
0.16
0.16
0.075
0.84
0.26
2.1
1.1
0.006
0.009
2.7
0.031
0.72
MC
0.56
o.oei
0.16
MC
MC
Cr
V
T1
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
2.4
1.0
MC
0.05
MC
MC
0.44
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
0.30
0.012
0.91
MC = Major component.
*Not quantified.
tlnternal standard.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppm.
9-12
-------
TABLE 9-9. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SAMPLE NO. IPW
(pg/m3)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tin
Er
Ho
0.19
0.23
0.022
1.2
0.70
*
0.001
<0.002
0.066
0.018
0.0035
0.018
0.0022
0.018
0.022
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.031
0.009
0.026
0.017
0.061
0.184
0.08
0.39
0.57
MC
0.04
0.013
0.003
0.11
0.061
t
MC
0.61
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
3.0
0.14
0.57
0.22
2.7
0.39
2.3
0.36
MC
0.061
0.22
MC
MC
MC
0.34
MC
MC
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
MC
1.1
MC
0.04
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
0.14
0.009
1-9
MC = Major component.
*Not quantified.
flnternal standard.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppm.
9-13
-------
TABLE 9-10. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SAMPLE NO. IX
(no/*3)
u
Th
B1
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sn
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In T
Cd
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn MC
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
A1
Mg
Na MC
F
B
Be
Li
MC = Major component.
*Not quantified.
tlnternal standard.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppm.
9-14
-------
r.ABLE 9-11. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SAMPLE NO. I imp 1
(pg/m3)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba 200
Cs
I 2
Te
Sb
Sn 1
In t
Cd 2
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo 100
Nb 0.4
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se 10
As 6
Ge
Ga
Zri'
Cu
Ni
Co 3
Fe 100
Mn 20
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
C1
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
70
20
500
MC = Major component.
*Not quantified.
tlnternal standard.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppm.
9-15
-------
TABLE 9-12. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SAMPLE NO. IIC3 + 10
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
IT
Ho
0.075
0.075
0.30
140
2.1
*
0.56
0.0038
0.019
0.0037
0.015
0.019
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sn
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.030
0.0075
0.022
0.011
0.075
0.11
0.037
0.30
0.19
MC
0.64
2.0
0.15
0.67
0.19
t
2.8
0.34
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
1.0
0.037
0.30
0.075
4.1
MC
11
0.53
MC
0.19
1.6
MC
17
3.2
7.5
MC
MC
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
5
P
Si
AT
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
4.9
0.60
4.9
0.026
MC
MC
MC
MC
MC
0.37
0.0037
1.1
MC = Major component.
*Not quantified.
flnternal standard.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppm.
9-16
-------
TABLE 9-13. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SAMPLE NO. IIC1 + F
SAMPLE NO. II GIF
((jg/m3)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
43
110
20,000
260
*
500
<2
6.5
<2
6.5
8.7
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
21
11
22
15
43
43
22
170
110
MC
540
3,500
86
87
86
t
2,800
150
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
. Br
Se
As
Ge
GA
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
••
1,300
6.5
150
43
7,100
9,700
6,500
350
MC
43
1,500
MC
10,000
65
1,700
MC
MC
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
130
170
2,800
22
MC
MC
MC
410
4.3
65
MC = Major component.
*Not quantified.
flnternal standard.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppro..
9-17
-------
TABLE 9-14. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SAMPLE NO. II PW
(ng/m3)
u
Th
81
Pb
T1
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
70
17
150
MC
570
*
0.13
1.7
<0.8
2.6
<0.8
2.6
2.6
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sfli
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
4.4
1.7
5.3
5.3
26
26
8.8
140
96
MC
140
440
44
410
17
t
1,100
96
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
590
1.8
110
17
530
5,200
2,000
230
MC
53
530
MC
7,100
440
700
MC
MC
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
170
70
70
2.6
MC
MC
5,500
87
0.8
220
MC = Major component.
*Not quantified.
tlnternal standard.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppm.
9-18
-------
TABLE 9-15. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SAMPLE NO.: II X
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In t
Cd
Ag
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na MC
F
8
Be
Li
MC = Major component.
*Not quantified.
tlnternal standard.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection "limit 0.1 ppffl.
9-19
-------
TABLE 9-16. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
SAMPLE NO.: II imp 1
(MS/™3)
u
Th
Bi
Pb
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In t
Cd
Ag 400
Pd
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb 40
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se 400
As 100
Ge
Ga 50
Zn
Cu
Ni 500
Co
Fe
Mn 700
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
LI
MC
700
MC
MC = Major component.
*Not quantified.
tlnternal standard.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppm.
9-20
-------
TABLE 9-17. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
COAL
(mg/kg)
U <0.8
Th <1
Bi 220
Pb 9
Tl
Hg *
Au
Pt 120
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sm
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.1
0.3
0.2
0.8
1
I
7
5
810
0.1
0.2
0.9
3
t
2
1
Rh
Ru
Mo
Nb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni
Co
Fe
Mn
6
1
74
4
37
1
2
3
11
<2
2
33
12
12
2
MC
MC
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
S
P
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
26
9
300
1
860
MC
MC
780
39
>UO
350
MC
0.1
40
MC = Major component.
*Not quantified.
tinternal standard.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppm.
9-21
-------
TABLE 9-18. SPARK SOURCE MASS SPECTROSCOPY
COKE
(mg/kg)
U 4
Th 3
Bi 3
Pb 7
Tl
Hg
Au
Pt 0.8
Ir
Os
Re
W
Ta
Hf
Lu
Yb
Tm
Er
Ho
Dy
Tb
Gd
Eu
Sn
Nd
Pr
Ce
La
Ba
Cs
I
Te
Sb
Sn
In
Cd
Ag
Pd
0.1
0.5
0.3
2
4
2
10
14
240
1
0.3
<0.8
1
5
f
3
3
Rh
Ru
Mo
Mb
Zr
Y
Sr
Rb
Br
Se
As
Ge
Ga
Zn
Cu
Ni.
Co
Fe
Mn
12
7
210
5
110
14
6
1
14
2
5
110
30
17
10
MC
560
Cr
V
Ti
Sc
Ca
K
Cl
s
p
Si
Al
Mg
Na
F
B
Be
Li
38
41
MC
4
MC
MC
MC
710
MC
MC
MC
MC
0. 5
46
MC = Major component.
*Not quantified.
tlnternal standard.
Note: All blanks are elements not detected, detection limit 0.1 ppm.
9-22
-------
TABLE 9-19. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
SILICOMANGANESE SERIES
(mg/m3)
Sample
I C310
I X
I imp 1
I imp 23
Total
As
0.018
0.098
0.0062
0.13
0.25
Hg
0.000060
0.00050
0.00018
0.016
0.17
Sb
0.000016
0.001
•0.000025
0.00020
0.00012
TABLE 9-20. ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
FERROMANGANESE SERIES
(mg/m3)
Sample
II C310
II GIF
II PW
II X
II imp 1
II imp 23
Total
As
24
15
7.7
1.03
0.15
0.08
48
Hg
0.045
0.025
0.052
0.014
0.11
0.26
0.51
Sb
0.15
0.088
0.038
0.019
0,0013
0.00087
0.30
TABLE 9-21.
ATOMIC ABSORPTION ANALYSIS
(jjg/kg)
Sample
Coke
Coal
As
20
20
Hg
0.24
0.15
Sb
0.58
0.30
9-23
-------
TABLE 9-22
LC FRACTIONAT1ON
SAMPLE:
IX, XAD-2 extract
...
Total SMtN«k
TakMtarlC*
HCCOVWf
TCO
"I
1,440
57.4
50.3
Fractioa
1
2
3
4
S
8
7
TCO'
m|
74
484
628
1.10
5.61
44
23
GMV
mf
70
2.8
2.6
••TVO+-MAV
total mf
1,510
60
53
ConcHtratioo3
•*/ (i»3, L, orkg)
47
GRAV*
"1
NDf
10
5.0
ND
ND
50
ND
TCO t GflAV
total mf
74
Canctntration*
moV (m3, L, or kg)
2.32
494 I 15.4
633 ; 19.7
1.10
0.03 i
5.61 ! 0.17
94 2.93 i
23 0.74 I
1 Quantity ia antira sampfc, datarmiiwd bafort LC.
* Portion of wmola sampte mad for LC, actual mf.
c Quantity rteovwtd from LC eonim, aetaal mf.
d Total mf compoted back to total sample
* Vataws supplied for both sampia sat and coocantratian.
f Mot dttactaUa.
9-24
-------
TABLE 9-23
LC FRACT1ONAT1ON
SAMPLE:
ISC, Sorbent Condensate
Total Sample11
Taken for LCC
Recovered
TCO
mg
18,3
14.7
14.7
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TCO*
mg
0.03
0.01
18.3
0.06
NDf
ND
0.02
GRAV
rag
65
52
65.3
TCO + GRAV
totaling
83,3
67
80
Concentration1
mg/ (m3, L.orkfl)
2.59
GRAV9
ing
8.44
1.50
68.5
ND
• 0.25
2.75
0.25
TCO + GRAV
total mg
8.47
1.51
87
0.06
0.25.
2.75
0.27
Concentration1
mg/ (m3, L.orkg)
0.26
0.05
2.70
0.002
0.008
0.008
0.008
' Quantity in toon sample, determined before LC.
* Portion of wrftoia sample mail for LC, actual mg.
6 OnMtity r»ca
-------
TABLE 9-24
LC FRACTIONAT1ON
SAMPLE:
IIX, XAD-2 Extract
Trt*S«mptob
TafcaaforLC*
RtcoMnd'
TCO
«•
279
1&.6
17.0
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
e
7
TCO"
-------
TABLE 9-25
LC FRACT1ONAT1ON
SAMPLE:
IICIF Particulates <
Total Sampto0
Takan for LC6
Recovered1'
TCO
ing
-
-
-
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TCO"
mg
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
GRAV
IRQ
66
13.2
13.2
TCO * GRAV
totaling
66.4
13.2
13.2
Concmtntwn*
mg/ (m3, L, or kg)
48.8
GRAV8
mg
NDf
NO
32
14
ND
18
2.0
TCO f GRAV
totaling
ND
ND
32
14
ND
18
2.0
Concentration1
mg/ (m3, L. or kg)
ND
NO
32
10
ND
13
1.47
1 Qoaotky !• totin samoto. dcttrmimd btfort LC.
b Portion of whol* samolo mad for LC, actual mg.
e Quantity racomad from LC coiamn,.actnal mg.
"Total mg coraputad back to total simple.
* Valuti suppliad for both sampla size and eoncantration.
f
9-27
-------
TABLE 9-26
LC FRACTIONATION
SAMPLE:
IIPW; Probe wash
TO* SaOBte*
TakoofwLC*
ntOBWM
TCO
Rf
-
-
-
Fraction
1
2
3
4
S
8
7
TCO*
at
-
-
-
-
-
.
-
6RAV
•t
51
25
32
TCO + SRAV
tttriot
51
25
32
ConcMtratim*
a*/
-------
TABLE 9-27
LC FRACTIONATION
SAMPLE:
Coal (CL)
Total Sample11
Taken for LCC
Recovered
TCO
mg
4.0
2.8
1.0
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
TCO8
mg
0.35
NDf
0.80
0.014
ND
0.29
-
GRAV
mg
35
25
30
TCO f GRAV
total mg
39
28
31
Concentration3
mg/ (ni^, L, or kg)
464
GRAV*
mg
24
2.0
7.7
2.9
1.1
4.9
0.86
TCO * GRAV
total mg
24
2.0
8.5
2.9 -
1.1
5.2
0.86
Concentration3
mg/ (m3. L, or kg)
286
24
101
35
13
62
10
3 Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC.
b Portion of whole sample usad for LC, actual mg.
c Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg.
** Total mg computed back to total sample.
* Values supplied for both sample size and concentration.
f
Not detectable.
9-29
-------
TABLE 9-28
LC FRACT10NAT1ON
SAMPLE:
Coke (CK)
Total Sample5
TataoforlC*
HMOWfd
TCO
mi
ulo
0.21
0.50
FrtCtMW
1
Z
3
4
5
8
7
TCO*
• •!
0.36
NDf
0.14
NO
ND
ND
NO
GRAV
*»
17
12
11
TCO + GRAV
totaling
17
12
12
Concantmion8 |
m«/ (ra^. L, w kg)
270
GRAV*
mi
.10
ND
0.86
0.86
1.4
0.6
0.6
TCO i- GRAV
tOttl ntg
10
ND
1.0
0.86
1.4
0.6
0.6
Concentr*tiona
tag/ (m3, L, or kg)
158
ND
16
14
22
10
10
'Quantity in i
LC.
* Portioo of whole sample imd for LC, actual mg.
c Quantity recovered from LC comma, actual mg.
Total mg computed back to total sample.
' Valoes supplied for both sample stza and conceMtntion,
Mot detectable.
9-30
-------
TABLE 9-29
1C FRACTIONAT1ON
SAMPLE:
Solvent Blank, B (AOL Methylene Chloride, 2500 ml)
Total Sample
Taken for LCe
Recovered
TCO
mg
0.007
0.02
Fraction
1
2
3
4
5
B
7
TCO8
mg
«0.01
«0.01
0,02
«0.01
«0.01
«0.01
«0.01
GRAV
mg
0
2.4
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration3
mg/ (m3. L. or kg)
GRAV8
mg
<0.1
<0.1
0.6
<0.1
<0.1
0.8
1.0
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration3
mg/ (m3, L. or kg)
1 Quantity in entire sample, determined before LC.
Portion of whole sample used for LC, actual mg.
c Quantity recovered from LC column, actual mg.
Total mg computed back to total sample.
e Values supplied for both sample size and concentration.
9-31
-------
TABLE 9-30
LC FRACTIONATION
SAMPLE:
Blank, Methylene Chloride (from field, 828 ml)
Total Sample11
Taken for LCe
Recovered
TCO
ra§
0.15
0.14
Fraction
- .-.- . V
"' 2
3
'. .-' •" 4..: '-„
:;•:. V - ::: v^
S
7
TCO"
mi
« 0.01
« 0.01
0.01
,.;.<< .0.01 :
0.02
0.01
0.1
GRAV
mg
2.1
2.1
6RAV*
m«
0.5
< 0.1
0.4
0.6
< 0.1
< 0.1
0.6
TCO + GRAV
totaling
Concentration*
rag/ (m^, L, or kg)
TCO + GRAV
totaling
Connntntion3
mq/ (m^, L, of kg)
* tUnatity in ratire sampl*. dtttrmiMd btfort LC.
b Portion of waote svnpU osed for LC, actnl mo.
e Quantitv ncmnrod from LC cotama, actual mg.
d Total rag computed back to total sample.
' Vaunt supplied for both sample an and concentration.
9-32
-------
TABLE 9-31
LC FRACTIONAT1ON
SAMPLE:
. Blank, Methylene Chloride/Methanol (from field, 541 ml)
Total Sample11
TakM for LCC
nOCOVOrod
TCO
mg
Fractioa
1
2
3
4
S
8
7
TCO"
mg
,
GRAV
mg
2.1
2.1
TCO + GRAV
totaling
Concentration3 .
mg/ (m3.L. orkaj
GRAV1
mf
0.25
< 0.1
< 0.1
0.2
< 0.1
< 0.1
1.6
TCO + GRAV
total mg
Concentration*
mg/ (m3, L, or kg)
* Quantity in intirt sampfa, dotanrnnad befora LC.
Portion of whole sample utad for LC, actual mg.
e Qnantity racaverad from LC column, actual mg.
Total mg computed back to total sample.
* Values supplied for both sample size and concentration.
9-33
-------
SAMPLE:
ir.S-7. H7.-Sorb
Table 9-32
IR REPORT
"—V»nt.»H
Wwt Nmnf
(eaT1)
3700-3000
3000-2800
3060
17204700
1670,1630
1580,1550
1590,1300
1400-1250
1150-1000
550-700
tMMrity
5' ' - •• '
*
:" w .
s
s
s
s
s
s ...
w
Asasomtat Comnwnts
OH nv NH
TH alifihatir 1
•' ' . 1
PH arwnatir -,..--. |
""On.«st«r. .aeid.'Me*ton» • '
Amide, ketone
Nitrites
•N1tram1ne N-NO,
AminP. nimflmne poalrs '
Alcohol. niin»rnu<: p«»lf«;
Aromatic subst. ... !
!
SAMPLE:
IR REPORT
WaMMwatar
(cm1)
t
(nttmtty
-
•
1 !
Assignmtfrt Comments ,
i
I
j
I
1
!
i
j
1
9-34
-------
. SAMPLE:
Table 9-33
IR REPORT
IIC310. cone, extract, particulates >3m, ferromanganese
W«vt Numbir
(cm'1)
J600-3100
3100-3000
3000-2800
1700
1660,1600
1400-900
900-700
••• -
Intewity
W
s
s
s
s
M
S
AHignmMt/Cammtftts
OH, or NH
CH, aromatic or olefinic
CH, aliphatic (stronger than aromatic CH)
Acid, ketones
Ketones, C-N
Numerous bands
Aromatic rings
OTHER REMARKS:
The spectrum resembles that of II GIF except the relatively stronger aliphatic
CH peaks
9-35
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-34
IR REPORT
II GIF, cone, extract. Darticulates >lm. ferromanaanese
Wm Nombtr
(cm1)
3600-2500
3100-3000
3000-2800
1700
1660,1600
1400-900
900-700
•
-*• , :• <
•
-
*'..•'» » *'•'"•""•
* ' '.
* i '* * _ * •
-~ , ^IDIVIWCY
VI
s
: , W. ,
M ' •.
M
W
S.
1 • -
*M." . '- "
'•'\.', !- "^'.->" "
MwiyiiiKBii w^untfnvnn
OHt" acidic, or NH
CH, aromatic or oleflnlc
CH, aliphatic (weaker than aromatic CH) .. -
Acid* ketones
Ketones, C-N
Nuinarous bands
Aromatic rings
'
- • . - -
i * ~ .1
*'•>.'• • •*•
QTHEA REMARKS:
9-36
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-35
IR REPORT
TTX_ rnnr. pxtract. XAO-2 ferromanaanese
Wm Numhtr
(em'1)
3420
3100-3000
3000-2800
1710
1600-900
900-700
i • ' -
,
'i.
"
Inunsitv
W
S
W.
W
M,W
S
.. - -
-
*
i
Aatgiumfit/Commtnts
NH
CH, aromatic
CH, aliphatic
Ketones
Numerous sharp bands
Numerous sharp peaks
aromatic rings
• .• . -, . *
• . , . • ', ; ' • -. • : . '•:.*'*-•<. -, ..'•("•-'• &*••<'
-.
•
-
•
OTHER REMARKS:
-------
Table 9-36
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: IISC. cojir;. axtrart. sm*h<>nt cnnrfpngatp. fprmmanganp«;p
Wm Number
i*"4) ;_'__-..
3600-3100
3100-3000
3000-2800
1710
1660,. 1600
1450,1375
1400-1000
900-700
— — • - --..-_
!i«mity ... ....
H " "~~
W
S
M
M
M
•- — tf"
M
!
1
1
" --• —
!
Atsigtiimat/Camimnts
OH, NH
CH, aromatic
CH, aliphatic
Ketones
Ketones, C-N, nitrite
CHi & CH3
Multi -bands
Aromatic rinas
-
I __
r*1" ""' '"""" "" '""
i
OTHER REMARKS:
The spectrum resembles that of II Clf except the much stronger aliphatic CH bands
9-38
-------
SAMPLE:
CL-7 coal
IR REPORT
Wavi Number
(cm-1)
3400
3000-2800
1700
1650
1080-1020
740
Intensity
M
S
M
M
W
W
Assignment Comments
OH. NH
CHT aliphatir
Acid
Amide, nitrate
Alcohol, Si-o
Aromatic subst.
SAMPLE:
IR REPORT
Wave Numbir
(cm'1)
Intensity
Assignment
Comraenu
9-39
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-38
IR REPORT
IX-1, LCI, XAD extract, venturf scrubber
W«t Number
(em'1)
2960-2850
1460-1375
Intrasfty
W
W
!
AsngnflMflt Cooimtnts
Aliphatic CH
Aliphatic CH
-
i
SAMPLE:
Table 9-39
IR REPORT
. IX-3, LC3, XAD extract, venturi scrubber
Wmt Nwnbif
(cm'1)
3100-3000
1600-950
800-700
Intensity
m
m,w
s
Assignment Comment!
Aromatic or olefinic CH
Numerous sharp bands due to aromatic rings
Multiple absorptions due to aromatic rings
9-40
-------
Table 9-40
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: IX-6. LC-6, XAD extract, venturi scrubber
Wive Number
(em'1)
3700 - 3100
3050
3000 - 2800
3000 - 2400
1770
1720
1720,1280,1120
1700
1650
1650,1620,790
1620, 1400
1580
1560
1560, 1360
1400 - 1000
850 - 700
1
Intensity
S
W
m
W
m
s
s, m
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
m
Assignment Commints
OH or NH, broad
CH, aromatic or olefinic
CH, aliphatic
OH, acidic, broad
C=0, lactone, 5-member ring
Ketone, lactone, lactam (5-ring)
aromatic ester
C=0, acid, carbamate, imide
Hydroxy kfctone., amide, ami dine
Organic nitrite CH9-0-NO
Carboxyl salt + CO-,-
Nitroso C-N=0
amide, nitro
CHC1-N02
Numerous broad peaks, ester, alcohol
Aromatic ring
9-41
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-41
1R REPORT
ISC-1, LCI, sorbent cond. ventari scrubber
Wm Numbar
(em'1)
2950-2850
1460-1350
Intratty
S
m
i
!
AsHomnwt Commsnts
CH, aliphatic
CH, aliphatic
-
•
Table 9-42
IR REPORT
ISC-2, LC2, sorbent cond. venturi scrubber
W*M Nambir
(cm'1}
2950-2850
1460-1350
Intimity
Asignnwtt Commino
s !CH, aliphatic >
m
I
1
i
1- j—
i
i
CH, aliphatic ;
!
! i
9-42
-------
Table 9-43
JR REPORT
ISC-3. LC3, sorbent cond. venturl scrubber
ffm Numbir
(era'1)
flOO-3000
850-2850
1600-900
ttO, 730, 710
Intensity
ffl
w
m
s
Antgnmant Comments
CH, aromatic
CH, aliphatic
Numerous sharp peaks, aromatic ring
Aromatic ring
!
Table 9-44
IR REPORT
HUE: ISC-4. LC4, sorbent cond. venturi scrubber
Wwt Nuraoir
(em'1)
3400
3100-3000
3000-2850
1740
1600, 1500
;K50, 1080
1020, 800
1200
1050
ltOO-700
_
-
iL
h—
L
Intensity
W
W
S
w
w
s
A
S
m
Assignnwnt Cammints
OH or NH
CH, aromatic
CH, aliphatic
C=0 ester, or overtone
Aromatic ring
SiCHv SiO
Sulfite, ether
Sulf oxide
Aromatic
i
9-43
-------
Table 9-45
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: ISC-6, LC6, sorbent cond. venturi scrubber
WmNanlwr
(em'1)
3600-3100
3100-3000
3000-2800
1720
3000-2500
1700
1670, 1630
1280, 1120
800-600
Intwarty
m
W
s
s
W
s
s
s
m
i
1
1
!
Asstgnmtnt Comirwnts
OH or NH broad ~~~
CH, aromatic or olefinic
CH aliphatic
OO ester, ketone
CH acid broad
C*0 acid ' "
Ketone, amide
Aromatic ester
Aromatic substitution
SAMPLE:
Table 9-46
IR REPORT
IIX-1. LCI, XAD extract. Ferroalloy
i Wm Number
1 (OB'1) IntW$fty
3000-2800 s
! 1500-1350 m
Ajjtqrontnt
Comments
CH, aliphatic
CH, aliphatic
9-44
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-47
IR REPORT
IIX-2, LC2, XAD extract, Ferromanganese
Wava Number
(cm'1)
J •
2000-2800
1500-1350
!
Intensity
5
m
Assignment Comments
CH. aliphatic
CH, aliphatic
i
I
Table 9-48
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: *1/v •**
Wive Number
(on'1)
3100-3000
1600-1050
900-700
Intensity
S
m,w
s
, — —
Assignment Camnw«s
CH, aromatic, olefinic
Numerous sharp bands, aromatic
Numerous sharp bands, aromatic
rings, fused rings
i _ — —
1
9-4-5
-------
Table 9-49
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: HX-4, LC4, XAD extract, Ferromanganese
WmNomlMr
(em'1)
3400
3100-3000
1600, 1500
1320 (d)
1240
300, 750
720
Intimity
S
W
m
m
m
s
Assignment Comnwnts
NH or OH
CH, aromatic
Aromatic rinq
C-N
Aromatic H rocking
Aromatic subst.
Fused rings
(positive identification of caribazole)
SAMPLE:
Table 9-50
IR REPORT
IIX-5, LC5, XAD extract, Ferromanganese
Wan Number
(cm'1)
3400
3050
2220
1700
1600, 1450
750, 700
i
Intensity
W
W
W
W
W
m
Assignment Comments
NH or OH
CH, aromatic
C=N, N=C=0
C=0
Sharp bands, aromatic ring
Aromatic subst.
9-46
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-51
IR REPORT
IIX-6, LC6, XAD extract, Ferromanganese
| Wave Number
(cm'1)
2500-3100
3100-3000
3000-2800
1710
1670
1600, 1500
1450-1100
820
750, 720
Intensity
W
W
W
S
W
W
W
W
S
Assignment Comrmnts
OH or NH
CH, aromatic, olefinic
CH, aliphatic
C=0
C=C
Aromatic ring
Aromatic ring, sharp bands
Aromatic subst.
Aromatic subst.
i
i
SAMPLE:
Table 9-52
IR REPORT
IICIF-1, particulates
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-53
IR REPORT
IICIF-5, particulates
-------
Table 9-55
IR RIPQRT
LCI, probe wash, Ferromanganese
Wave Number
(cm'1)
3000-2800
; 1500- 1300
1
i
Intensity
S
m
Assignment Comments
CH, aliphatic
CH, aliphatic
-
•
Table 9-56
IR REPORT
IIPW-2, LC2, probe wash, Ferromanganese
Wave Number
(cm'1)
3000-2800
Intensity
w
•
Assignment Comments
CH, aliphatic
i
•
i
9-49
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-57
IR REPORT
II PH-6, LC6, Probe wash. Ferromanoanese
Wm Number
(em-1)
3500 - 3200
3100 - 3000
3000 - 2800
1720
1700
1660, 1620
1580, 1300
1270, 1120
1230, 1210
1180, 1060
750
Intimity
w
m
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
s
Auigamtnt Comments
OH, NH
CH, aromatic, olefinic
CH, aliphatic
OO ester
CO, acid ketone
amide, nitrite
N-NO.,, nitramine
aromatic ester
ester
al cohol
aromatic substitution, C-C1
SAMPLE:
Table 9-58
IR REPORT
II PW-7, Probe wash, Ferromanqanese
Weve Number
tew'1)
3700 - 3100
3100 - 3000
3000 - 2800
3000 - 400
1720
1670,1640,1600
1250
1060, 1000
750
Intensity
s
W
m
w
s
s
s
m
s
Assignment
OH or HH. broad
CH, aromatic
Comments
CH, aliphatic
OH, acid, broad
C=0, ester, ketone
Ketone, amide, amidine, nitrite
Ester, phosphate, P=N cyclic, C
Si-CH3
, nitrate
F,, C-C1,
Alcohol
Aromatic subst. PF, CF3, C-C1
9-50
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-59
IR REPORT
IC310 cone, extract, participate >3u, silicomanganese
Warn Number
(em'1)
3600 - 3100
3030
3000 - 2800
1740
1650
1150
1050
1150, 1050
Intensity
m
w
m
w
w
s
s
s
Assignment Commtnts
OH or NH
CH, aromatic or olefinic
CH, aliphatic
OO, ester
Amide lac tarn
Alcohol cyclic P«N, S=0
Alcohol, sulfoxide, PO^*
Si-0-aliphatic SiO-Si
R9 PO;
SAMPLE:
Table 9-60
IR REPORT
1C If particulates
-------
Table 9-61
IR REPORT
IPW, cone, extract, probe wash, silicomanganese
Vv^NrV NQBiBOT
. (a*'1)
3600 - 3100
3600 - 2400
3100 - 3000
3000 - 3800
1780
1780, 1170
1730
1280, 1230,
1170, 1120
1200
1070, 1050,
1020
1170,1050,850
880
Intensity
m
w
w
s
w
w
s
s
s
s
-
s
s
Asagmmot . Comments
OH or NH
OH, acidic
CH, Aromatic, olefinic
CH, Aliphatic
Lactone, carbonate
Chloroformate
Ester, ketone, imide, Lac tarn
Esters
p=0, P=N, sulfite, sulfonic acid F-aryl
Si-0 -aliphatic
Alcohols, sulfoxide, PO^
Acid sulfate
c=c, Aromatic substitution
SAMPLE:
Table 9-62
IR REPORT
(. cone, extract, XAD-2. Silicomanqanese
W*wt Number
<«1)
3100 - 3000
3000 - 2800
1950 - 1600
1600 - 800
780, 730
Intmshy
S
W
W
m
s
Asofmunt Comments
CH, aromatic, olefinic
CH, aliphatic
Numerous weak absorptions
esters, ketones, Acids, Amides or overtones
Numerous sharp peaks, aromatic HC
Aromatic substitutions
9-5?
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-63
IR REPORT
ISC, cone, extract, sorbent condensate, silIcomanganese.
Wav» Niunbtr
(em'1)
3100 - 3000
3000 - 2800
2000 - 1600
1600 - 1000
1000 - 700
Intensity
S
m
w
s, m
s
"Positive i dentil fi cation of a.nt
Assignment
Comments
CH, aromatic or olefinic
CH, aliphatic
Numerous peaks, C=0, C=N overtones
Numerous sharp bands aromatic
Numerous sharp bands aromatic
vibrations
substitutions
hracene. phenanthrene fluorene.
henzoovrene
•
•
SAMPLE:
Table 9-64
IR REPORT
II PW, probe wash, ferromanganese
Weve Number
(on'1)
3600 - 3100
3100 - 3000
3000 - 2800
1730, 1700
1660, 1600
1450
1400 - 1200
900 - 700
(The spectrum
Intensity
W
S
S
m
s
s
Assignment CommMts
OH or NH
CH, aromatic or olefinic
CH, aliphatic
Ketones, esters
Ketones, C-N
Multipeaks
s ! Esters, ethers
s
Aromatic rings
\
-esembles that of II GIF)
9-53
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-65
IR REPORT
IICIF-3, particulates
-------
Table 9-67
IR REPORT
IIPW-3, LC3, probe wash, ferromanganese
Wm Numbtr
(on'1)
aoo-sooo
1930
Intensity
S
W
800-2800 j w
1600-1000 | m
100-700
S
Assignment Commtnts
CH, aromatic, olefinic
>C=C=CH2 allene
CH, aliphatic
Numerous sharp bands, aromatic ring-
Multiple bands, aromatic substitution, fused rings
1
AMPLE:
Table 9-68
IR REPORT
IIPW-4. LC4, probe wash, Ferromanganese
Wavt Nttmbu
(on'1)
3500-3200
3100-3000
3000-2800
1600
1500-1000
900-700
Intensity
W
m
w
m
m-w
s
!
Assgmwnt Commwrtj
NH or OH
CH, aromatic, olefinic
CH, aliphatic
C=C, aromatic ring
Multiple bands, aromatic ring
Aromatic substitution
9-55
-------
Table 9-69
IR REPORT
II PH-5, LC5, probe wash, ferromanqanese
Warn Hunter
(enf1)
3500 - 3200
3100 - 3000
3000 - 2800
2210
1730
1700
1650
1600, 1580
1450, 1350
1520, 1350
1280, 1120
820, 750
Intensity
m
m
s
w
m
s
w
m
m
m
w
s
Assignment Comments
OH, NH
CH, aromatic, olefinic
CH, aliphatic
ON, nitrile
OO, ester
C*0, ketone, acid, carbamate, imide, cyclic
imide
OC
Aromatic substitution
Amines
Nitro aromatic
Aromatic ester
Aromatic substitution
i
!
—
1
9-56
-------
Table 9-70
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
CL-1, coal
Wava Number
(on-1)
3000-2800
1450, 1370
Intensity
m
w
,
j
1
Assignment Comments
CH, aliphatic
CH, aliphatic
-
'
| -...•••
1
t
Table 9-71
I R REPORT
SAMPLE- CL-2, coal
Wava Numbar
(cm'1)
3000-2800
1450, 1370
Intensity
m
w
!
Assignment CamnwBB
CH, aliphatic
CH, aliphatic
!
I
9-57
-------
Table 9-J2 ,
IR REPORT
SAMPLE- LC3, coal
Wavt Number
(em'1)
3100-3000
3000-2800
1600
1450
1370
1300, 1230,
1250, 1020, 950
870, 800, 740
Intensity
m
s
m
s
m
w
s
Assignmtnt Comments
-
CH, aromatic, oleflnic
CH, aliphatic
Aromatic ring
Aliphatic %, CH, .
Aliphatic CH2> CH3
Broad weak bands
Aromatic substitution
1
|
Table 9-73
IR REPORT
SAMPLE- CL4, coal
WavB Number
(cm'1)
Intensity
Assignmtnt
Comments
3450
3100-3000
3000-2800
1700
1600, 1450
1400-1300
1020
800, 750
w | OH or NH broad 1
m CH, aromatic, olefinic '
s CH, aliphatic j
w Acid, ketone, lactam, imide '
m (Aromatic ring j
w C-N, amines !
w Alcohol
m Aromatic substitution, pyridine !
I ;
i ;
;
i
1 i
i *
9-58
-------
:. CL-5, coal
IR REPORT
Wwt Number
(Cnf1)
3600-3100
3050
3000-2800
1600, 1700
1450, 1370
i870, 800
1750
'.
Intensity
w
w
s
m
Assignment Comments
OH, NH, broad
CH, aromatic
CH , aliphatic
Acid, ketone, aromatic
m CH2, CH3 aromatic
w
m
Aromatic, pyridine
Aromatic, pyridine
!
\
\
i
CL-6, coal
SAMPLE*
Wave Number ,
< i Im
(cm'1}
3600-3100
3100-3000
3000-2800
2720
1700 1
1780
1660, 1610, 810!
1660, 1280, 870i
1020
750 i
Table 9-75
IR REPORT
snstty
m OH or NH
Assignment Comments
, broad i
w CH, aromatic
s |CH, aliphatic
w Aldehyde
s 1 Ketone,
acid
w Aldehyde
s Nitrite
s iNitrate
s iAlcohol
m ; Aromatic
substitution, C-CL
! i
i !
i
1
i
9-59
-------
SAMP!.- c°ke LC-
Wave Number
(cm'1)
_2920, 2850
1450, 1370
SAMPLE, C°ke LC
Wive Number
(cm )
2920, 2850
1450, 1370
i
-1
Intensity
m
m
-2
Intensity
m
m
1
Table 9-76
IR REPORT
Assignment Comments
CH2, CH3 aliphatic
CH2, CH3 aliphatic
i
.
i
Table 9-77
IR REPORT
i
Assignment Comments j
CH2, CH3 aliphatic <
Crig, CH~ aliphatic j
i
i
i
i
i
1
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
*
9-60
-------
SAMPLE:
Coke LC-3
Table 9-78
IR REPORT
Wm Numbtr
(cm'1)
2920, 2850
1450, 1380
Intensity
m
w
I
Assignment Comments
CH2, CH3 aliphatic
CH2, CH3 aliphatic
-
•
1
.
. .. . . .
Table,9-79.
IR REPORT
SAMPLE:
Coke LC-4
Wave Number
(cm-1)
2920
1450, 1380
1100, 1020
Intensity
Assignment Comraeots
w JCH2, CH3 aliphatic
w
w
CH2, CH3 aliphatic
Alcohol, ether, broad
!
I
9-61
-------
*AU^. CokeLC-
WmNrabcr
(cm'1)
2920
SAMPLE, Coke LC
WmtNwniMr
(on-1)
3400
2920, 2850
1700
1600
1460, 1370
1260
1060
•5
IttMiity
w
™
-6
hnusity
W
S
m
w
w
w
w
Table 9-80
IR REPORT
Assignment Commtnts
CH2, CH3 aliphatic
!
"
i
i
!
' ' 1
Table 9-81
IR REPORT
Assignmtflt Commints
OH, NH, broad
CH2, CH^ aliphatic
Acid, ketone
Diketone, H20 j
CH2, CH3 aliphatic
Ac1d broad
Alcohol broad
i
'
i
i
9-62
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-82
IR REPORT
ISC-7, LC7, sorb, cond. venturi scrubber
Wave Number
ten'1)
3700 - 3000
3000 - 2800
3060
1720, 1700
1670, 1630
1580, 1550
1590, 1300
1400 - 1250
1150 - 1000
550 - 700
Intensity
S
S
W
S
S
S
S
S
S
W
Assignment . Comments
OH or MH
CH, aliphatic
CH, aromatic
C=0. ester, acid, ketone
Amide, ketone
Nitrites
Nitramine N-N02
Amine, numerous peaks
Alcohol, numerous peaks
aromatic subst.
SAMPLE:
Table 9-83
IR REPORT
IIC310. cone, extract, particulates >3u. ferromanoanese
Wave Number
(cm'1)
3600 - 3100
3100 - 3000
3000 - 2800
1700
1660, 1600
1400 - 900
900 - 700
The spectrum r
aliphatic CH p
Intensity
W
S
S
S
S
m
s
esembles that of
eaks
Assignment
OH or NH
CH, aromatic or olefinic
CH, aliohatic (stronger t.han
Comments
arom. CH)
Acid, ketones
Ketones, C-N
Numerous bands
Aromatic rings
II GIF except the relatively
stronger
9-63
-------
Table 9-84
IR REPORT
SAMPLE: II GIF, cone, extract, oarticulates
-------
SAMPLE:
Table 9-86
IR REPORT
II SC, cone, extract, sorbent condensate, ferromanganese
Wave Number
(em'1)
3600 - 3100
3100 - 3000
3000 - 2800
1710
1660, 1600
1450, 1375
1400 - 1000
900 - 700
The spectrum r
CH bands
Intensity
m
w
s
m
m
m
w
m
•esembles that of
Assignment
Commints
OH, NH
CH, aromatic
CH, aliphatic
Ke tones
Ketones, C-N, nitrite
CH2 + CH.,
Mul ti bands.
Arnmatir ring<;
•- -— ' -^-.sr.v-v.s.
II C1F except the much
stronger aliphatic
SAMPLE:
CL-7 coal
Table 9-87
IR REPORT
Weve Number
(em'1)
3400
3000 - 2800
1700
1650
1080, 1020
740
intensity
m
s
m
m
w
w
Assignment
Comments
OH, NH
CH, aliphatic '
Acid-.
Amide, nitrate
Alcohol, Si-o
Aromatic subst.
9-65
-------
SAMPLE:
Coke LC-7
Table 9-88
IR REPORT
^NW MflRIVVi
(on'1)
3400
2920, 2850
1150
1100
Intimity
S
w
w
w
Aaqanmt
Commmts
OH, NH (broad)
CH?, CH7 aliphatic
Alcohol
Alcohol, (broad)
9-66
-------
The following samples showed no detectable IR bands
IX-2, LC2, XAD-2 extract, venturi scrubber
IX-4, LC4, XAD-2 extract, venturi scrubber
IX-5, LC5, XAD-2 extract, venturi scrubber
IX-7, LC7, XAD-2, extract, venturi scrubber
ISC-5, LC5, sorbent cond., venturi scrubber
II X-7, LC7, XAD extract, ferromanganese
II C1F-2, particulates
-------
The following reconstructed gas chromatograms were printed in the document:
IC310
IC1F
IPW
ISC
IIC1F
I IPW
IX
IISC
9-68
-------
LRMS REPORT Table 9-89
SAMPLE; IX-1, XAD-2 extract, sllicomanganese
Major Categories
Intensity
100
Category
Aromatic hydrocarbons
CCould be contaminants)
MW Range
78-128
-
•
Sub-Categori**, Specific Compounds
Intensity
Category
m/e
Composition
10
Benzene
78
10
To! uene
9?
,0
10
Xylene
106
10
10
TrimPthvl/methvl ethvl benzene
120
Naphthalene
12?
CinHfl
Other
9-69
-------
LRMS REPORT
Table 9-90
SAMPLE; Ix"2» XAD-2 extract, sillcomanganese
Ma jor Cattgoriw
Ifittnstty
100
10
1
Category
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Fused aromatics <216
Heterocyclic sulfur compounds
-
MWRang.
92-196
178-202-
184
Sub-Citt8ori«s, Specific Compounds
Intensity
100
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
. 1
1
Cattery
Naphthalene
Tol uene
Xylene
Indene
Methyl naphthalene
Bi phenyl ene/acenaphthal enes
Anthracene/phenanthrene
Alkyl naphthalenes
Alky! bi phenyl s/acenaphthal enes
Dibenzothiophene
Methyl anthracene/phenanthrene
Pyrene, etc.
m/t
128
92
106
116
142
152
178
156-17
168-19
184
192
202
Composition
CioH8
C?H.
CsHio
LaHg
CiiHio
L f 2 H 9
C- uHn
3 C,.H,, - C, ,H,
5 C.,H,, - C,,H, -
Cl2H8^
C,-H,,
C.sHm
OtiMr
9-70
-------
LRMS REPORT Table 9-91
SAMPLE: IX-3, XAD-2 extract, silicomanganese
Major Categories
Intensity
100
100
10
Category
Aromatic hydrocarbons
Fused aromatics < 216
Heterocyclic S compds.
MWRing*
116-196
166-202
184
Sub-Categories, S pacific Compounds
Intensity
100
100
100
100
"10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Category
Naphthalene
Bi pheny 1 ene/acenaphthyl ene
Fluorene
Anthracene
Indene
Alkyl naphthalenes
Bi pheny 1/acenaph thai ene
Alkyl biohenvls/acenaohthalene
Di benzoth i ophene
Methyl anthracene/phenanthrene
Pyrene, etc.
m/e
128
•152
166
178
V16
142-15
154
168- 19J
184
192
202
Composition
CioH9
C,-H7
CiaHio
Cn»Hio
G9H8
) CllHlO - Cl2Hl2
CT7»,n
' TT ^HT» - TnHie
d
-------
Table 9-92
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE; IX"6' XAD'2 extract» slllcomanganese
Intensity
10
10
10
10
Cattgory
Carboxylic acid
Esters
Ketones
Heterocyclic S corapds
MWRang«
122-284
136 -
180
184
Sub-Cattgorws, Specific Compounds
Intensity
10
10
10
10
10
10
Cattgory
Benzole acid
Methyl benzoate
Peri naphthi ndenone
Dibenzothiophene
Palmitic acid
Stearic acid
m/9
122
136
180.
184
256
284
Composition
C7H,02
CpH,0,
C,,H.O
C,,H=S
C!SH,,0^
C,aHi;o~
•
_
Otter
1 unidentified peaks at 140, 168, 200, 208
9-72
-------
LflMS REPORT Table 9-93
SAMPLE: IX-7, XAD-2 extract, si 1icomanganese
Major Categories
Intensity
1
1
1
1
1
Category
Heterocyclic N compds
Ketones
Ethers
Alcohols
Esters
MWRangi
129-253
230 -
122
122
Sub-Categories, Specific Compounds
Intensity
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Category
Methyl benzyl alcohol
Benzyl methvl ether
Acridine
4- ring heterocyclic N
Naphthaquinoline
5- ring heterocyclic N
Benzocarbazole
Benzanthrone
Phthalate
m/»
122.
122
179
203
229
253
217
230
Composition
CgHl gO . • . .
CattioO
CisHgN
CisrUN
CI?HI iN
Cu-HuN
Ci«H^N
CirHioQ
Other
10 unidentified ions at m/e 44, 60, 61
9-73
-------
Table 9-94
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: Mpns.anto ferroalloy I-SC-1
Major Cattgoriu
Inamtty
100
1
dtt^ory MW Range ~]
Sulfur 256
All pha tics 120-440
Sub-Cat*9ori«, Specific Compounds
Inttmity
100
Cattgory
Sulfur (S«)
m/t
256
Composition
Ss
OttMT
1 aliphatics with 120
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: Monsanto ferroalloy I-SC-3
Table 9-95
Major Categories
Intensity
100
1
Category
Fused alternate/nonalternate hydrocarbons
Fused alternate/nonalternate hydrocarbons
• .
MW Ring*
<216
>216 -
Sub-Categories, Specific Compounds
Intensity
100
10
10
1
1
1
•
Category
An th racene/ phenanth rene
Fluorene
Pjrene/fl uaranthene
Benzofluorene, etc.
Chrysene, etc.
m/e
178
166
202
216
218
228
Composition
C i u H i o
CiaHio
CisHio
C17H12
Ci iHi u
CijHiz
Other
m,
Benzopyrenes, etc, at /e 252
9-75
-------
Table 9-96
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: ISC-6, Sorbent condensate, silicomanganese
Major Cmgorits
Intensity
100
10
Cm**y
Ketones
Esters
MWRang. n
180-208
390 -
Sub-Cattgoriw, Specific Compounds
tatmaty
100
10
10
10
'...'.••.
Cattgory
FT uorenone/peri naphth
Methyl -fluorenine, etc
Anthraquinone, etc.
Dioctylph thai ate
m/e
180
194
208
390
Composition
Cl'HqO
CiuHioO
C i uHoO-i
^21.^380^
Other
9-76
-------
UWtMKHIT T.D1.M7
SAMPLE: IIX-1, XAD-2 extract, ferrdfriaflgahese
Major Categories
Intanrity
100
Category
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
MW Rang*
220-480
.
Sub-Categori**, Specific Compounds
Intensity
Category
m/e
Composition
Oth«r
-------
Table 9-98
LAMS REPORT
SAMPLE: HX-2, XAD-2 extract, ferromanganese
Major Categories
Intensity
10
10
Category
Alkylated polycyclics or aromatlcs
Fused aromatics <216
-
MWFUnge
200-380
202
Sub-Categories, Specific Compounds
10
Cittgery
Pyrene
202
Composition
-1 flnl 0
OttMT
9-78
-------
Table 9-99
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: HX-3, XAD-2 extract, ferromanganese
Major Categories
Intensity
Catagory
100 j Fused aromatics
100
Fused aromatics
10 | Heterocyclic S
<216
>216
compds.
MW Rang*
152-210
?1fi-3Rn
184
Sub-Categories, Specific Compounds
Intensity
100
100
100
100
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Category
Anthracene/phenanthrene
m/a
178
Pyrene/fluoranthene !?n/>
Chrysene, benzanthracenes
Benzopyrene, perylene
Aceanthralene
Fluorene
Methyl acenaphthalene
Dibenzthiophene
Methyl anthracene
Benzofluorenes
Benzonaphthalene
1
228
252
152
IW
168
184
192 n
?1fi
?w
Compojition
CiuHin
risHio
CiaHi2
r2aHi2
Ci2H8
CI^HUL —
Ci*Hi2
CiaHaS
r.isHi.2 .. ...
ri7Hi2
r,TH,t
Other
10
PAH at m/e 230-302
PAH at m/e 190-350
9-79
-------
LRMS REPORT Table 9-100
SAMPLE; IIX-4, XAD-2 extract, ferromanganese
Major Cattsorits
Intimity
100
100
10
Category
Heterocyclic N
Fused aromatics
Fused aromatics
compds
>216
<216
•
MW Bangs
167-267
228-302 '
178-202 '
Sub-Cattgorm, Sptcific Compound!
fnttxuity
100
100
.100
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Category
Carbazole
m/»
167
Benzocarbazole (217
Benzopyrenes
Anthracene/phenanthrene
Methyl carbazole
Dimethyl carbazole
Pyrene
Benzoanthracenes, chrysene
Methyl benzo carbazole
Dibenzo carbazole
252
178
181
195
202
228
231
267
Benzoperylene J276
Methyl cholanthrene J268
Oi benzo chrysenes
302
Composition
C13H9N
CisHnN
CzoHi 2
CH*HI o
Cn»HiiN
Ci«Hi,N i
C i s H i o
Ci sHi 2
CirHisN
Co,HMN
C22Hl2
C2!Hl6
C, ,H, u
10
m
PAH at "/e 191, 241, 243, 245, 257, 258, 326
m
PAH at /e 200 to over 400
9-80
-------
LRMS REPORT Table 9-101
SAMPLE: HX-5. XAD-2 extract, Terrotnanganese
Major Categories
Intensity
100
100
Category
Heterocyclic N comods
Ketones
1
MW Range
1fi7-?<^
230-280
Sub-Categories. Specific Compounds
Intensity
100
100
10
10
10
10 -
10
10
10
Category
Carbazole
m/e
167
Benzanthrone 1 230
Naphthoisocyamid
Methyl carbazole
4-Ring heterocyclic N
Benzo carbazole
4-ring N
5-ring N
Di benzof 1 uorenone
153
181
203
217
227
253
280
Composition
C 1 2H«rN
Ci7HioO
CnH7N
CisNi-rN -••'•
C15H,N
CisHnN
C17H9N
CnHuN
C21Hi20
Other
10
1
1
PAH at m/e 254
Heterocyclic N
Oxygen-compds
, m/e 179-379
m/e 180-380
9-81
-------
LRMS REPORT Tablfi 9-
SAMPLE; IIX-6. XAD-2 extract, ferromanqanese
Major Cattsorits
Intensity
100
100
10
Cattgory
Heterocyclic N comods
Ketones
Carboxylic acids
MW Range
179-303
180-304
122
Sub-Catasorits, Sptcrfic Compounds
Inttnstty
100
100
100
100
100
100
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Category
Acridine
FT uorenone
4- Ring heterocyclic N
4-aing heterocyclic 0
Anthraauinoline
Benzanthrone
Benzoic acid
Methyl acridine
Methyl fl uorenone
Dimethyl acridine
Anthraauinone
Benzocarbazole
Methyl anthraquinoline
5- ring N
6-rina N
Dibenz acridine
m/e
179
180
203
204
229
230
122
193
194
207
208
217
243
255
.103
279
|
Composition
C,,HaN
C,,HoO
CnHoN
Ci5H?0
r--M- -N
C.-H170
C-HC0-^
CmHiiN
C- Ml nQ
CisHijN
C- ..HaO-
C,eH,,N
'C,9H,-,N
C H. .N
C--H,,N
Other
10
PAH at m/e 219, 244, 254, 258, 280, 304
PAH at m/e 265-380
9-82
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE; IIX-7. XAD-2 extract,
Table 9-103
IVtajor Categories
Intensity
in
10
1
Category
Hptprnryrlic N rnmpHc
Ke tones
Esters
MW Rings
iPQ-^m
23n-?an
136
Sub-Categories, Specific Compounds
Intensity
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
Category
Acridine
4-Ring N
Benzocarbazole
Anthraquinoline
Benzanthrone
5-Ring heterocvclic N
6-Ring heterocylic N
Di benzof 1 uorenone
Qu incline
Alkyl quinolines 1
Methyl benzoate
Methvl acridine
m/e
17Q
?ni
217
229
?3n
253
279
?sn
129
43-171
136
i
-------
Table 9-104
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: Monsanto fprrnallny
Major Cat»gori«i
Intensity
1
Category MW RangB
Heterocvclic sulfur cnmpn.md* 1S4
Sub-Categoric*, Specific Compound!
Intensity
I
Category
pihenzothiophenp
-
m/9
1R4
Composition
r,,w.<;
I
Other
y-84
-------
Table 9-105
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: Monsanto ferroa 1 l.oy
II-C1F-2
Major Categoric*
Intensity
1
1
Category
Hpfprnrvrl ir sulfur rnmnnunrtc
Aromatic hydrocarbons
MWRans*
1PA
<280
Sub-Categories, Spacific Compounds
Intensity
Category
Composition
Pi benzothi ophene
IS!
fur*j'
Other
Benzenes below m/e 280
9-85
-------
Table 9-106
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE; Monsanto ferroalloy II-C1F-3
Major Categories
Intensity
100
1
Category
Fused alternate/nonalternate hvdmrarbon<:
Fused alternate/nonalternate hydrocarbons
MW Ranca
>?1fi
<2lfi
Sub-Categories, Specific Compounds
Intensity
inn
100
100
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
Category
^ter»zpyran«s ate
DibenzchrvsenP. etr.
Di benzanthracene
Methv1-benzpyrpnP«:T Ptr
Methyl -di benzanthracene
Dibenzpyrene, etc.
Benzanthracene, etc.
Methvl benzanthracene
Pvrpne/f 1 unranthpnp
Anthracene/ohenanthrene
Biphenyl/acenaphthene
m/e
•?co
?7fi
?7R
?fifi
292
302
228
242
?nj>
17fi
154
Corn position
r,,H,»
r -. - H - v
•r- ,u, ,
Cr,H-r
C-..H,.
C,,H,-
Hi =»Miu
r i ? w i a
n^Hio
Ci-H^o
Oth«r
Fused altPrnatP
•3=55"
-------
Table 9-107
LRMS REPORT
Monsanto ferroaH ov. II-C1F-4
Major Categories
Intensity
in
Category
Fused alternate/nonalternate hydrocarbons
MW Ranga
>216
*
Sub-Cat«5ori«s. Spscific Compounds
intsruity
10
10
" Category
Dibenzoyrene
10 1 Dibenzchrysene
10
10
1
Di benzanthracene
Benzovrene. etc.
Benzanthracene. etc.
i
m/a
302
326
276
278
?52
??R
Composition
C-.H!.,
C-j •jHi •)
C t •> H 1 1.
C? «Hi »
f! i an i -j
'
Other
Polvcvclics to /e 430
9-87
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE; Monsanto fefroalloy
Table 9-108
II-C1F-5
Major Categories
Intamity
10
10
^ ' *
Category
Fused alteraate/nonalternate hydrocarbons
Ketones
'••• . •; . . _
MW Range
>216
304
Sub-Categori*!, Specific Compounds
Intensity
10
10
10
1
1
1
Category
Dibenzpyrene
6- ring 0 (ketones)
*
Dibenzchrysene, etc.
Dibenzanthracene, etc.
m/e
302
304
326
276
278
277
Composition
C2!, Hllf
Cij
22 "12
C22Hllt
1
1
1
Other
9-88
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: Mnngantn fo^rnallrw TT-PtF-fi
TASLi 9-109
Major Categories
Intensity
100
100
1
1
Category
Ketones
Heterocyclic nitrogen compounds
Esters
Carboxylic acids
MW Bangs
200-300+
200-300+
222
122
|
Sub-Categories, Specific Compounds
Intensity
100
100
100
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
. 10
1
1
. 1 :•••••"
1
Category
6-Ring N
6-Ring 0 (ketones)
Dibenzacridine, etc.
Fluorenone
Phenanthri done
Methyl phenanthridone
Benzacridine, anthraquinoline, etc.
5-Ring-N (heterocyclic N)
5-Ring-O (ketone)
Benzole acid
Diethyl phthalate
m/8
280
303
304
279
IflO
195
209
219
229
?,in
253
254
270
?77 ,.
122
222
203
204
Composition
C2iH13N
'r»jH8n
r,',.H.NO
C,tH,»NO
C17H11N
C,.H,,N
Ci9H100
.
r,M,n. '
Ci aHi uOu
C15H,N
C15H90
Other
Polvcvclics with 300 < m/e < 500
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: Monsanto ferroalloy
Table 9-110
II-C1F-7
Major Categories
Intensity
1
.... % .
Category
Heterocvclic nltrooen comoounds
. • •.
•• . .
MW Ranga
223-303
MW. Sp«cific Compounds
Intensity
Category
m/e
Composition
Other
Azo comoounds wttt 223 - m/e -303
9-30
-------
-RMS REPORT
.'AMPLE: Monsanto fprrnal ]py
Table 9-111
II PW-T
Irtajor Categories
Intensity
Category
MW Rangt
Aliphatics
Sufa»Categori«, Specific Compounds
Intansity
Category
Composition
Other
Aliphatics with 200 - m/e <450
9-91
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: Monsanto ferroalloy
Table 9-112
II-PW-2
Major Categories
Inttnrity
in
1
1
1
Cmgory
ArnnwHr hvHrnrarhnnc
|
1
1
1
IVTW Range
225
•
Sub-Cittsories, Specific Compounds
Intensity
Category
m/e
Composition
Other
10
Benzene substituted with aliphatic chain and N and
exterior to ring with /e = 225 (Ci3H20NCl)
9-92
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE:
Monsanto ferroalloy
Table 9-113
II-PW-3
Major Categories
Intensity
100
inn
Category
Fused altarnate/nonalternate hydrocarbons
. Fused alternate/nonalternate hydrocarbons
MW Ring*
<216
>216
Sub-Categories. Specific Compounds
Intensity
100
mn
100
10
10
10
10
10
10
in
10
Category
Pyrene/f 1 uoranthene
Benzoovrenes . etc.
Anthracene/ phenanthrene
Benzofluorene, etc.
Methyl -benzanthracene
Diabenzchrvsene
Di benzanthrarene
m/a
202
?9S
9W
178
21$
218
242-
?7fi
77R
^09
326
Composition
CieHi.
Pi qUl 9
r20H!2
Ci uHi a
Ci7Hi2
CI^HI* ,
£j
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: Mnncantn
Table 9-114
TT-PW-4
Major Categories
Inttmity
100
1
1
•
Category
Fused al ternate/iwjnalternate hydrocarbons
Fused aJlteroAte/nonalternate hydrocarbons
Heterocyclic nitrogen compounds
MW Rang*
>21fi
<216
217
Stib-Cattgorits, Specific Compounds
intensity
inn
100
10
10
10
m
1
1
1.. ....
1
1
Category
Benzopyrene, etc.
Diabenzchrysene
Oi abenzanthracene
Piab^nzpyrene
Benzocarbazole
Pvrene/fluoranthene
m/«
22-g
252
276
279
™?
3?c
?17
242
258
202
37$
Composition
C i an i •>
Co nni •>
C2-Hi ?
CzaHi*
T22MIU
ricHuw
CioHiu
r,sM,n
1
Other
Polvcvclics below 200
m,
Polycyclics 380 ^ '/e ^460
9-94
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: Monsanto ferroalloy
Table 9-115
II-PW-6
Major Categories
Intensity
100
in
1
Category
Ketones
Ho'Tpynrvrl i c ni'Tvonfln rnmnnimrtc
Ester?
MW Bangs
300+
")r\r\ "Win*
Sub-Categories, Specific Compounds
Intensity
100
in
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
in
10
10
10
10
10
1
Category
Benzanthrone, etc.
Phthalate
5-Rinq N
5-Ring 0 (polycyclic aromatic ketone)
Dibenzacridine. etc.
6-Ring N
6- Ring 0 (kstone on 6 fused rings)
Fluorenone, etc.
m/e
230
?nn
202
203
243
244
253
254
?*s
279
280
302
303
304
180
Composition :
C,,HnO
c, ;HON
ciaHiiN
ri«HinO
r-.H13M
CiaHaO
Other
Polvcvclics with 305 - /e <460
9-95
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: Monsanto fenroal 1 oy
Table 9-116
II-PW-7
Major Cattsorits
Intxnity
in
i
i
Cat*?ory
Ifat-rtnae
H«to*»ft/>wr1ir nit-rwiftfi /•nmn/iunHc
IVJW Ranc»
pnn_?nn-t-
i7Q_^nn-t.
Sub-Ctttsorits, Specific Compounds
Intsnaty
1Q
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Cattgory
Benzanthrone . etc.
Acridlne
6-Rin$ N
m/t
230
179
203
204
22Q
253
254
279
280
303
304
Composition
C--rH,nO
C. ,RaN
C,cHQN
Ci 7.H1. iN
Ci?HnN
C-.H1:N
Othar
ra,
Polvcyclies UP to /e 350
9-96
-------
REPORT Table 9-117
SAMPLE: Monsanto ferroalloy coal CL-1
Major Categories
intensity
100
inn
in
Category
Sulfur
Aliphatir hydrocarbon";
1 In i Honf i •f i orf
WW Ranga
256
?7n-4ia
1«fi
Sub-Cat»sori«, Specific Campounda
Intensity
Category
•m/e
Composition
Other
-------
LRMS REPORT
Table 9-118
SAMPLE; Monsanto fermallov. coal C( -
Major Categories
Intensity
100
10
10
10
Cattoory
Fused alternate/nonalternatP HC m/e216
Fused alternate/nonalterrwi:* Hf m/e216
Heterocyclic sulfur comoounds
Sulfur
MW Range
216->5QQ
178-216"
184-234
256
Suh-Catesories, Specific Compounds
Intumty
10
in
10
10
10
10
10
10
• . • •
Category
AnthrarPHP/phenAnthrono
Methyl anth/phgnanthj-pno
DibPn?thioDhPne
Pyrerte/f 1 uoranthene
BenzofluorenP*;. Pt.r.
Chrvsene. etc.
Methvl chrvsene. etr.
Benzopyrenes , etc.
' •
m/a
178
1Q2
ifld
202
?ifi
22R
?4?
252
Composition
f; ^HI n
r? =ui •>
r. .H.S
CieH,«
r,.H13
C,aH-,
C?nHi-
1
I
Other
100
Alkylated PAH + other polycylic species, /e 206 to <500
9-98
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE:
Table 9-119
Monsanto ferroalloy coal CL-4
Major Categories
Intensity
100
100
1
1
1
Category
Heterocvclic ni
Fused alternate
Fused alternate
troaen compounds
, nonalternate H/C >m/e216
, nonalternate HC < m/e216
Sulfur
Esters
MW Rang*
1fi7_r>-M-
25?-*.qnn
178-202
256
Sub-Categories, Specific Compound]
Intensity
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
Category
Carbazole
Alky! carbazoles
Benzo carbazole
Alkvl benzo carbazoles . /
Dibenzo carbazole
Alkvl dibenzo rarh^nlo* '
£h.)'*ysene/bpn7nanthrarpnP1 Atr
Benzopyrenes, etc.
Anthracene/phenanthrene
Pi hydro anthrarpma/phpnanthirnne __
Pyrpnf»/fli»nranthena , _
Sulfur
Phthalate
in/a
1fi7
181-r?/
2^7
.?1-?R7
267
8lT???
??S
252
17?
ion
202
25£._
Composition
r^M^N
7 f*i,MnM - r,TM,.N
, CifiHnN
P17H13N . r2.IH21N
CgfltinN :
C?lTHi.s£l...lCajkUMU
.rt«H»»
C.inUT,
C i Ms «
C-LfttOZ.
CifiHin
' «!8 .
Othar
100
Unidentified polvcvclics (extpnsive alkvlation pr»«i»n».l.
than those above, /e 230 to >500
9-99
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: Monsantn ferroalloy. coal CL-6
Table 9-120
Major Cattsori**
Inonsity
100
10
•10
Cattgory
Ketones
Heterocyclic nitrogen compounds
Esters
MW Bangs
180- ^350
179-223 "
Sub*Cattsori*», Specific Compound*
Intensity
in
10
10
10
10
10
Catt?ory
Phthalafp*;
ArrirHnp
Fluorpnnnp
Alkyl fluorenones
Phenyl benzoqulnone
Alkyl phenvl befizpaui nones
m/t
17Q
isn
194-22;
184
J98-24I
j
i
Compoiition
Pj-H-jN
risHsn
' Ci liHiaO - CifiHii,0
C' ?HpO?
) Ci3Hio02- CisHisO^
1
!
Oth«r
10
(each species) unidentified polycyclics, mostly alkylated, /e
200 to /e 350
9-100
-------
LRMS REPORT
SAMPLE: Ferroal 1 o% CK-1
Table 9-121
Major Categories
Intensity j Category
inn
1
Sulfur
Aliohatlcs
MW Rango
7t;fi
^?n-44n
Sob-Cat«gori«, Specific Compounds
Intuuity
Category
m/e
Composition
Other
9-101
-------
TABLE 9-122. TOTAL MASS OF EMITTED PARTICULATES
Series no. I II
Process Silicoraanganese Ferromanganese
Sampling point Outlet of Venturi Bypass stack
Scrubber
Volume of gas sampled 32.12 »3 1-36 m3
Total particulars
lOu cyclone 0.0111 g 38.4706 g
3u cyclone 1.8218 12.6509
lu cyclone 0.0684 10.1065
filter 0.0319 19.3515
probe and cyclone rinses 0.1411 11.9077
' Total 2.0743 92.4872
Total concentration
lOu cyclone 0.34 mg/m3 28,000 mg/m3
3u cyclone 56. 9,300
lu cyclone 2.13 7,400
filter 0.99 14,000
probe and cyclone rinses 4.4 8,800
Total 64. mg/m3 68,000 mg/m3
9-102
-------
TABLE 3-123. TOTAL ORGANICS (mg/m3) FOR SASS TRAIN SAMPLES (I)
OUTLET OF SCRUBBER, SILICOMANGANESE PROCESS
Compound categories Participates
>3u* >3u* Rinses
Aliphatic hydrocarbons 0.2
Aromatic Hydrocarbons 0.2
Fused aromatics <216
Fused aromatics >216
Ether
Ketone
Alcohol -0.01 -0.01 0.2
Ester 0.2
Ami ne
Heterocyclic N
Heterocyclic S
Carboxylic Acid
Sul fides
Amide
Sulfur
Nitrita
Si li cone Compounds -0.01 -0.01 0.2
Sorbent
Resin
2.3 ,
23
11
0.1
0.8
0.1
0.8
0.1
1.7
0.7
Module
Condens.
0.05
2.7
0.02
0.005
0.01
0.004
0.01
0.004
0.005
0.004
0.2
0.004
Total
2.5
23 '
14
0.02
0.1
0.8
-0.3
1.8
-0.1
0.1
1.7
0.7
-0.1
-0:1
0.2
-0.1
0.004
^Concentrations estimated from IR and total TCO and Grav data only.
9-103
-------
TABLE 9-124. TOTAL ORGANICS (rag/m3) FOR SASS TRAIN SAMPLES II
BYPASS, FERROMANGANESE PROCESS
Compound categories
Aliphatic hydrocarbons
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Fused Aromatics <216
Fused Aromatics >216
Heterocyclic S
Heterocyclic N
Ke tones
Alcohols
Esters
Carboxylic Acids
Particulates
>SM* <3|j
~0.1
-0.1
0.2
4.5 33
1.1 7.9
0.8 6.4
0.06
0.06
Rinses
1.9
-0.1
14
22
0.8
7.8
0.02
0.08
!^^^^^=s^^=^====
Sorbent Module
Resin Condens.*
3.9
3.5
370
390 0.3
37
70 0.07
53 0.05
0.8
4.2
.
Total
"6.9
3.7
380
450
37
80
67
-0.1
0.9
4.3
Concentrations estimated from IR and total TCO and Grav data only.
9-104
-------
Table 9-125
ORGANIC EXTRACT SUMMARY TABLE
Sample IX. XAD-2 Extract. Silicomanganese
o
Total Organlcs, mg/m
TCO. mg
GRAV, mg
LCI
2.32
74.
<0.1
LC2
15.
480.
0
LC3
19.
620.
5.0
LC4
0.03
1.1
<0.1
LC5
0.17
5.6
<0.1
LC6
2.93
44.
50
LC7
0.74
23.
<0.1
2
41.
1260.
65
Category
Int/mg/m
Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Fused Aromatics <216
Heterocyclic S Compounds
Ketones
Esters
Carboxylic Acids
Alcohols
Heterocyclic N Compounds
Ethers
100/2.3
100/14
10/1.4
1/0.1
100/9.4
100/9.4
10/0.9
10/«0.1*
10/«0.1*
10/0.01*
10/0.01*
10/0.7
10/0.7
10/0.7
10/0.7
1/0.1
1/0.1
1/0.1
1/0.1
1/0.1
2.3
23.
11.
1.7
0.8
0.8
0.7
0.1
0.1
0.1
o
en
Concentration estimated from LC,IR data, with reference to LRMS data of LC3 and LC6
-------
Table 9-126
ORGANIC EXTRACT SUMMARY TABLE
Sample ISC., Sorbent Condensate. SiHcomanganese
1
Total Organics, mg/rn
TCO, mg
GRAV. mg
LC1
0.26
0.03
8.4
LC2
0.05
0.01
1.5
LC3
2.70
18.
68.
LC4
0.002
0.06
<0.1
LCS
0.008
<0.1
0.25
LC8
0.008
<0.1
2.75
LC7
0.008
0.02
0.25
£
3.0
18.
81.
Category
Int/mg/m^
Sulfur (Se)
Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
Fused Aromatlcs <216
Fused Aromatlcs >216
Nitrites
Ketones
Esters
Ethers
Sul fides
Amides
Alcohols
Amines
100/0.2
1/0.002
4
100/0.05*
100/2.7
1/0.02
100/0,001
100/0.001
WO/0. 004
-^^
100/0.004
•*•*
100/0.004
100/0.007
100/0.001
100/0.004
100/0.004
100/0.004
100/0.004
100/0.004
100/0.004
0.2
0.05
2.7
0.02
0.004
0.01
0.01
0.005
0.005
0.004
0.004
0.004
*
-------
Sample
Table 9-127
ORGANIC EXTRACT SUMMARY TABLE
IIX, XAD-2 Extract, Ferromanganese
«1
Total Organic;, mg/m
TCO, mg
GRAV. mg
LCI
3.9
2.25
3.0
LC2
7.0
9.4
<0.1
LC3
780
195
870
LC4
36.
1.21
48.
LCS
6.7
6.2
3.0
LC6
88
30
90
LC7
17
11
12
2
940
255
940
Category
Int/mg/m
Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Fused Aromatlcs <216
Fused Aromatlcs >216
Heterocycllc S compounds
Heterocyclic N compounds
Ketones (polycyclic aromatic)
Carboxylic adds
Esters
100/3.9
10/3.5
10/3.5
100/372
100/372
10/37
10/1.7
100/17
100/17
..
i
100/3.3
100/3.3
100/42
100/42
10/4.2
10/8.1
10/8.1
1/0.8
1
3.9
3.5
380.
390.
37.
70.
53.
4.2
0.8
-------
Table 9-128
ORGANIC EXTRACT SUMMARY TABLE
Sample HCIF, Participates <1yi, Ferromanganese
*l
Total Organic*, mg/m
TCO, mfl
GRAV. mg
LCI
<0.1
-
<0.1
LC2
<0.1
-
<0,1
LC3
23
-
32
LC4
10
-
14
LCS
<0.1
-
<0.1
LC«
13
-
18
LC7
1.5
-
2.0
£
48
*
66
Category
Int/mg/irr
Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Fused Aromatlcs <216
Fused Aromatlcs >216
Ketones (polycycllc aromatic)
Heterocycllc N compounds
Esters
Carboxyllc Acids
«0.2
«0.2
1/0.2
100/23
10/10
«0.2
«0.2
100/6.4
100/6.4
1/0.06
1/0.06
1/1.5
•
•
«0.2
«0.2
0.2
33.
6.4
7.9
0.06
0.06
-------
Table'9-129
ORGANIC EXTRACT SUMMARY TABLE
Sample II PH. Probe Uash, Ferromanganese
0
Total Organic*, mg/m
TCO. mg
GRAV, mg
LCI
1.95
-
2.65
LC2
<0.1
-
<0.1
LC3
28
-
39
LC4
7.8
-
11.
LC5
0.54
-
0.73
LC6
7.2
-
9.8
LC7
1.44
-
1.96
2 '
47
-
65
Category
Int/mg/m
Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Fused Aroma tics <216
Fused Aromatics >216
Heterocyclic N compounds
Ketones (polycyclic aromatic)
Esters
Alcohols
1/1.9
«0.2
100/14
100/14
1/0.07
100/7.7
1/0.07
100/0.2*
100/0.2*
10/0.02*
10/0,02*
10/0.6
100/6.5
1/0.06
'
1/0.1
10/1.3
•
•
1.9
«0.2
14.
22.
0.8
7.8
0.08
0.02
UD
I
O
UD
^Concentration estimated from LC.IR data with reference to LRMS data of LC4 and LC6
-------
Table 9-130
ORGANIC EXTRACT SUMMARY TABLE
Coal (CL)
Total Organic*. mg/m
TCO.mg
GRAV, mg
LCI
286
0.36
24
LC2
24.
<0.01
2.0
LC3
101
0.80
7.7
LC4
35.
0.014
2.9
LCS
13.
<0.01
1.1
LC6
62.
0.29
4.9
LC7
10.
<0.01
0.86
Z
530
1.2
43.
Category
Int/mg/kg
Sulfur
Aliphatic Hydrocarbons
Fused Aroma tics <216
Fused Aroma tics >216
Heterocycllc Sulfur
Heterocycllc Nitrogen
Esters
Ke tones
100/143
100/143
.
100/12*
100/12*
10/7.8
10/7.8
100/78
10/7.8
•
1/0.17
«r-^
1/0.17
100/17
100/17 -
1/0.17
1/0.06*
1/0.06*
100/6.4*
100/6.4*
1/0.06*
10/5.6
1/0.56
100/56
10/0.90*
1/0.09*
100/910*
*
160
160
8.0
100
7.8
30
0.88
65
10
I
*Est1mated from LC and IR data, with LRMS data of adjacent LC fractions
-------
Table 1-131
Sample
ORGANIC EXTRACT SUMMARY TABLE
Coke (CK)
•>
Total Organic*, mg/m
TCO. mg
GHAV. mg
LCI
158
0.36
10.
LC2
<1.5
<0.01
<0.01
LC3
16.
0.14
0.86
LC4
14.
<0.01
0.86
LC5
22.
<0.01
1.4
LC6
10.
<0.01
0.6
LC7
10.
<0.01
0.6
2
230
0.50
14.3
Category
Int/mg/ kg
Sulfur
Aliphatics
Halogenated Aromatics
Aromatic Hydrocarbons
Heterocyclic N, 0, S
Sulfides, Oisulfides
Nitriles
Ethers
Alcohols
Aldehydes, Ketones
Nitroaromatics
Ami nes
Phenols
Esters, Amides
Carboxylic Acids
Sulf oxides
100/156
1/2.0
100/13**
10/1.3**
10/1.3**
10/1.4**
10/1.4**
10/1.4**
10/1.4**
10/1.4**
100/7.0**
100/7.0**
10/2.2**
10/2.2**
10/2.2**
10/2.2**
10/2.2**
10/2.2**
10/2.2**
10/2.2**
100/5.0**
100/5.0**
10/1.0**
10/1.0**
10/1.0**
10/1.0**
100/5.0**
10/1.0**
100/5.0*'
10/1.0**
10/1.0**
100/5.0*'
10/1.0**
10/1.0**
10/1.0**
10/1.0**
160.
15.
2.7
2.7
3.6
3.6
3.6
9.2
19.
8.2
4.2
8.2
2.0
2.0
6.0
2.0
**Estimated from LC and IR data, no LRMS data available
-------
LEVEL 2
9-112
-------
TABLE 18
GC/MS Polycyclic Organic Matter (POM) Analysis
Satople Series: 1, Sillcomanganese, after scrubber
Cone en t ra t ion:
mg/ra3
Species"*"\J»aiaple
Floorene
Anthracene/Phenanth-rene
Carbazole
Methyl-Anthracenes
some r s
'luoranthene
'yrene
Methyl Pyrene /Methyl Fluoranthene
Chrysene/Benzo(a) anthracene/etc.
Methyl Chrysenes
7, 12- Dimethyl Benz(a)anthracene
Benzofluoranthene, Benzo(e)pyrene
Uenzo(a)pyrene
Perylene
Methyl Benzopyrenea
3-Methylcholanthene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
Benzo(ghl) Perylene
Dibenzo( a , h) anthracene
Dlbenzo(c.g) carbazole
Dibenzo(ai & ali)pyrenea
Coronene
TOTAL
m/e
165+6
178
167
192
192
202
202
216
228
242
256
252
252
252
266
268
276
276
2i78
267
302
300
I C310
*
0.00016
0.000058
0.000042
0.00026
I GIF
0.00039
0.00019
0.00015
0.00073
I PW
0.00012
0.00064
0.00049
0.00017
.
0.0014
I X
0.86
0.83
Q,42
0.044
0.046
1.82
I EC
0.62
1.30
0,028
0.018
0.20
0.17
0.005
0.016
2.40
Total
1.5
2.1
0,070
0.018
0.24
0.22
0.005
0.016
4.2
in
M
M
o>
*A11 blanks are items not detected, detection limit 0.01 pg/m3
-------
TABLE 19
GC/MS Polycycllc Organic Matter (POM) Analysis
Sample Series: II, Ferromanganese, bypass
Concentration: "g/»
Species^ — ^Sample
Floorene
Anthracene/Phenanthrene
Carbaeole
Methyl-Anthracenes
Isomers
Fluoranthene
Pyrene
Methyl Pyrene/ Methyl Fluoranthene
Chrysene/Benzo (a) anthracene/etc.
Methyl Chrysenes
7,12-Dimethyl ficnz(a)anthracene
Benzofluoranthene, Benzo(e)pyrene
Henzo(a) pyrene
Perylena
Methyl Benzopyrenes
3-Methylcholanthene
Indeno (1,2,3-cd) Pyrene
Benzo(ghl) Perylcne
Dlbettzo( a , h) ant li racene
Dibenzo(c.g) carbazole
Dlbenzo(ai & ali)pyrenes
Coronene
TOTAL
We
165+6
178
167
192
192
202
202
216
228
242
256
252
252
252 *
266
268
276
276
2-7B
267
302
300
II C310
0.0014
0.054
*
0.0018
0.034
0.019
0,048
0.00065
0.031
0.036
0.029
0.099
0.0041
0.079
0.15
0.10
0.68
.11 GIF
•
0.014
0.0055
0.0057
0.026
0.26
0.29
0.026
0.053
0.26
0.55
0.12
0.23
0.29
2.1
II PH
0.62
0.18
2.46
2.28
0.54
3.40
3.13
2.82
0.50
0.34
0.47
0.71
0.16
0.12
17.
II X
16.3
222.
9.6
24.
220.
14.
46.
5.24
0.58
47.
0.67
5.28
0.78
612.
II 8C
0.0077
0.081
0.014
0.0044
0.0034
0.039
0.031
0.0063
0.0041
0.0041
i
0.19
Total
16.
220.
9.6
24.
0.0034
220.
2.3
1A_
49.
5.2
0.58
51.
3.1
1.20
0.39
6.0
1.4
0.90
0.079
0.54
0.51
660.
*A11 blanka are -tt«»m« o.-vt-
,4,, t-^«i--> «-. 14—*•- n o
... / 3
-------
ADDITIONAL DATA
9-115
-------
Table 8
t
Total Extractable Organics. ng/n3
1 II
Process Sillconanganese Ferromanganese
TCO GHAV TOTAL TCO GRAV TOTAL
Particulates extract
10 + 3u — -U3.03 -x.0.03 ~ 6.6 6.6
1 + filter — -^0.03 ^0.03 — 48. 48.
probe and cyclone — 0.47 0.47 — 37. 37.
rinse extract
XAD-2 extract 45 2.18 47 205 910 1110
Sorbent condensate 0.57 2.02 2-.S9 0.41 ^0.1 0.41
extract
9-116
-------
Table 20
Total Polycyclic Organic Matter
Series I
Process Siiicomanganese
Sampling Location After Scrubber
_ ^ ^ ^ _„, ^ M ^ u, _ -,- -M „ „ mjm--^ TQ ts. 3.
tng/m^
Polynuclear
Level 1 GC/MS
SASS Sample
C310 M>.01 0.00026
C1F M3.01 0.00073
PW M).01 Q.0014
XAD-2 11 1.8
SC 2.7 2.4
Total I* 4-2
Heterocyclic
SASS Sample
C310
GIF
PW
XAD-2 0.1
SC
Total 0.1
Data Comparison
II
Fe rromanganese
Bypass
17 AM I II !•••! «I.II.«T-
C\JST"—"~ '
og/rn^
Aromatics
Level 1 GCftIS
4.5 0.60
33 .2,1
36 17
760 602
0.3 0.2
840 650
N Compounds*
1.1 0.3
7.9
0.8
70. 9.6
0.07 -v.Ol
80 9.7
* Carfaazole and Dibenzocarbazole were the only two heterocyclic N species
determined in GC/MS analysis.
9-117
-------
Table 37
of Organic Analysis Results: Major Components
Concentration, ng/n3 *
?rocaaa
Stapling Sita
Upatraam of
Vantori
Siliconanganeae
Downstream of
Vanturi
Aliphatic Hydrocarbon*
AroMtic Rydxoccrbotis
Fused Aroaaties < 216 tfiT
Pu««d Aroaweics > 216 MW
H«t«rocyclic H
H«t«rocyclic S
Caeonas
Estars
Carboocylic Acida
Organic G»s««
(GC1 & GC2)
6.9
3.7
380
450
80
37
67
0.9
4.3
l,030ppm
2.5
23
14
0.02
0.1
1.7
0.8
1.8
0.7
3,
Caa volunaa ara eorractad to standard conditions of 101 K?a
(29.9" Hg) 2nd 21.1'C (70'?).
9-118
-------
Table 36
Summary of Particulate Emission Data
Sampling Site
Process
Effluent Flow Rate
m3/sec
m3/hr
Particulated Concentration
mg/m3
Particulate Emissions
kg/hr
Average Furnace Power
Mtf (megawatt)
Particulate Emissions
• kg/MW-hr
Upstream of
Venturi
Ferromanganese
1.20
4300
68000
290
17.3
17
Downstream
of Venturi
S ilicootanganese
1.51
5400
0.35
22.5
0.016
9-119
-------
Table 38
Sonmary of Process and Effluent Parameters
Sapling Site
Process
Up* treat of
Ventrsri
Ferromanganese
Downstream
of Venturi
Silicotnanganes e
Electrode Consumption
Ib/day*
lb/m3 of stack gas **
6,150
Q.Q59
9,000
0.0*9
Coal/coke content of
Feed, Z*
Bails 8 Ions. ag/n>
Total Organlcs (SASS train)
Total Aromatics
1,200
830
Aroaatlcs of HW> 216 450
Volatile Organics (GC1 & GC2) 1»030
50
26
0.02
3,000
* Calculated from data in Table 1
** Calculated froa data in Tables 1 and 6
9-120
-------
Table 39
Comparison of AAS and SSMA Data for
Arsenic and Antimony in Selected Samples
Arsenic
mg/m3
Antimony
Sample
AAS
SSMS
AAS
SSMS
Particulates
I C 310
II C 310
II C IF
Impingers
I Imp I
II Imp I
0.018
24
25
0.0062
0.15
0.022
*
MC (>27)
*
MC (>21)
0.0068
0.15
0.02
150
88
0.02
1.3
0.39
660
840
n.d.
5
n.d.
**
**
Solids Parr Bombed for SSMS
I x
II x
Coal
Coke
0.098
1.03
20 mg/kg
20 mg/kg
n.d.
**
**
n.d.
II mg/kg
14 mg/kg
**
1.
19.
0.3 mg/kg
0.6 mg/kg
n.d.
**
n.d.
n.Q mg/kg
1 mg/kg
**
Major Component
Not detectable, or < 0.1 ppm weight in sample analyzed.
9-121
------- |