-------
TABLE 44.  AVERAGE DRINKING WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS IN STUDY SITE CANDIDATES***
Conwunlty
Hardness (ng/1)
Calcium («g/l)(b)
Hagneulum (ng/l)
-------
                           TABLE 44.   (Continued)
Community Cadmium (PK/U

Cruljj
Hayden
Range ly

Canon City
Steamboat Spriiigu
Green Kiver and
Kock Springs
Ktiiuuerur
Sheridan

0(5)
0(5)
0(4)

0(7)
0(5)
<1(2) 1)

<1(2)
0.33(3)
(b) / j i \ ( b)
Chromium (pg/1) Arsenic (pg/1)
STUDY COMMUNITIES
0(5)
0(5)
0(7)
CONTROL COMMUNITIES
0(5)
0(4)
0.33(3)

<1(2)
)
Cu|)|>er (|ig/l) l.uud (|iH/l)

125.0(4) 0(5)
47.5(4) 0(5)
0(6) 0(7)

212.50(4) 0(5)
0(4) 0(4)
0(2) 1.33(3)

7.00(2) <1(3)
40.00(1) <10(2)
(a)   The number provided for  each parameter represent a  the mean value; the following number in puruntliesoa Is tho
     number of measurements on which  the mean is baaed.
(b)   Dissolved.
-------
drinking water were not done at regular or frequent intervals making this
information adequate only for general comparisons.

    One area of concern which was investigated in only a cursory manner is
the relationship between surface water quality and drinking water quality.
The treatment processes utilized by public water suppliers are quite
variable (see Appendix D) and the effect of these processes on specific
water constituents is often uncertain.  Using the surface and drinking water
information for the nine study site candidates (eight water supplies),
rank-order correlations were computed (Table 45).  Although the data is very
sparse, there is some indication that minerals are transmitted from surface
waters to drinking water.  Unfortunately, there are too few data to draw any
inferences about trace elements.

    In order to determine the relative positions of the surface water
monitoring sites, the drinking water intakes, and the mines, these three
items were plotted on detailed county maps.  This illustrated whether the
mining was upstream or downstream from the drinking water intake and the
relative positions of monitoring sites and coal mining.

Criteria for Comparison of Candidates

    Although the nine remaining study site candidates are homogeneous, in
that they were carefully selected to meet several criteria, significant
differences remain.  Additional considerations were specified in order to
further reduce the list of candidate communities.  It should be noted that
many of these considerations have elements of subjectivity, and the
researchers' judgments (based on all available empirical data) were used.

Quantity of Coal Mining—
    Although all nine sites are potentially impacted by coal mining, there
is great variability in the annual coal tonnage produced in the areas.  The
communities impacted by the greater rate of coal production are obviously
more desirable for study.  Since mining serves as an indirect measure of a
potential exposure, more intense mining would be expected to produce greater
effects on the community's residents.  Since the linkages from mining to
water pollution and from water pollution to health are tenuous, the study
sites should be selected to maximize the probability of detecting these
effects.

Relative Importance of"Coal Mining to the Community's Economy—
    This factor is related to the size of the town, the quantity of the
mining, the proximity of mining to the town, and other economic activities
in the area.  A given production level (tons of coal mined per year) has
different implications for a town of 1,000 than for a town of 15,000.  Also
competing economic activities (e.g. , recreation) would tend to dilute the
importance of coal mining.  Although epidemiologic studies require large
populations to obtain reliable disease rates, in this instance a small
population with few non-coal economic activities is most desirable because
small communities would be more intensively impacted by coal mining
                                    146
-------
TABLE 45.  RANKS AND CORRELATIONS OF SURFACE WATER AND DRINKING WATER CONSTITUENTS IN THE
           STUDY SITE CANDIDATES(a)
(b) (b)
Hardness Calcium
Community
sw
D(e)
S
D
Magnesium
S
D
Sodlun,(b)
S
D
Sulfate(b)
S
D
Cadmium^
S D
STUDY COMMUNITIES
Craig. CO
Hay dun, CO
Rangely, CO
115(6)
140(4)
278(1)
129(5)
101(6)
291(1)
30(7) 113(2)
33(5)
70(1)
68(4)
175(1)
9.8(5)
13.0(3)
24.7(1)
9.8(5)
7.8(6)
28.3(1)
21(3)
20(4)
63(1)
51(3)
21(4)
81(1)
39(5)
68(4)
167(2)
131(3)
54(4)
203(1)
0.4 0
0.4 0
1.0 0
CONTROL COMMUNITIES
Oman City, CO
Steamboat Springs, CO
Green River/Hock Springs, UY
Kenimerer, UY
Slier Idiin. UY

120(5)
115(7)
230(3)
250(2)
30(8)
-------
                                                           TABLE 45.   (Continued)
00
Community
Chromiun
-------
activities and competing economic production would tend to dilute the
effects of coal mining.  The chosen sites should experience as intense and
undiluted an impact of coal mining as possible.

Clarity of Water-Impacted Areas—
    Although the categorization of communities as study or control sites  is
presented as a dichotomy, the actual status of some communities is somewhere
between these extremes.  To emphasize differences in community health based
on mining/water impacts, the study sites should fall neatly into one
category or the other, and not be ambiguous on this criterion.

Quality of Water Monitoring—
    Surface water monitoring activities in the western coal mining areas
under consideration are quite variable both in the number of monitoring
stations and in the chemicals analyzed.  Obviously, it is desirable to have
monitoring stations close to the drinking water intakes and to have those
stations analyzing such constituents as toxic metals in addition to usual
water parameters.

Presence of Air Monitoring—
    There is some variability among the nine sites in the extent of air
quality sampling.  It is advantageous for a community to have air quality
data available, in part because air quality may be affected by surface
mining.  In addition, an epidemiologic survey should take air pollution
exposures into account as a significant influence on health.

Proximity to Control Sites—
    The spatial arrangement of the nine study site candidates indicates a
cluster of communities (northwestern Colorado and southwestern Wyoming) with
two distant sites (Canon City, Colorado, and Sheridan, Wyoming).  Choices
within the cluster are preferred since exposed and control sites (in terms
of mining/water impacts) can be close to one another.  This allows for
matching of the two communities in terrain, climate, etc. , and also would
facilitate travel between them as required in an epidemiologic field study.

Availability of Other Information—
    Several detailed studies of western coal areas have been completed, and
communities surveyed in such research documents are preferable.   The level
of detail is variable, but often such topics as environmental quality,
socioeconomic character of the area,  and projected changes consequent to
coal mining are covered.  This criterion is based not on inherent character-
istics of the communities, but rather on the pragmatic advantage of being
able to utilize the material compiled by others.

Presence of Coal-Utilizing Facilities—
    Since coal-utilizing facilities have their own potential environmental
and health impacts, it is Important that their presence be noted in site
selection,   whether this factor increases or decreases desirability of a
site is not, however, entirely clear.
                                    149
-------
     Because  coal  burning  pollutes  the  air and water  through  stack,  releases
 and leaching of bottom ash,  the  presence  of such facilities  makes  isolation
 of mining-based pollutant effects  quite difficult.   However, mine-mouth
 electricity  production is increasingly common at large western coal mines.
 In fact, many of  the  large expansions  are linked to  coal-burning power plant
 construction.  Thus mining areas with  coal-utilizing facilities would suffer
 from greater difficulty in isolating mining effects  but be better  represent-
 atives  of  the expanding western  coal mining areas.

 Community  Profiles

     The following sections provide an  overview of the information  readily
 available  on the  nine study  site candidates.  These  descriptions include
 objective  information on  geographic and demographic  characteristics as well
 as subjective evaluations of  the data  quality (i.e., quantity of coal
 mining, relative  importance  of coal mining, etc.).   Table 46 provides a
 categorical  representation of each of  those factors  for all  the communities.
 Although such simplified  schemes sacrifice some detail, it does provide a
 summary of community  profiles.   Greater detail can be found  in the text
 which follows.             ....-__.

 Craig,  Moffat County,  Colorado—
     The 1975 population of Craig, Colorado, was 5,426.  The annual
 population growth rate from  1970 to 1975, 5.5 percent, was somewhat higher
 than the growth rate  for  the  entire state (2.9 percent).  The per  capita
 income  in  Craig is $4,833, considerably higher than  the state average of
 $4,030.  Moffat County is located in the  northwest corner of Colorado, and
 approximately two-thirds  of its inhabitants reside in Craig.   The median age
 in the  county is 31.1 years,  10.5 percent of the residents being over 65.
 More than  99 percent of the population is white.

     Mining activity which  would potentially have an  impact on Craig's water
 is  located between 25 and  50 miles upstream in Routt County (east of Craig).
 There are  18 mines in this area, 11 of them surface.   They are all medium
 size mines, each providing around one million tons per year.   Projections  of
 future production are similar to levels of current production.   The distance
 between the mining activity and Craig's water intake would greatly dilute
 any  impacts that the mining might have on the drinking water  quality.  This
 detracts from Craig's attractiveness as a study site, since its status with
 respect to potential exposure would be somewhat tenuous.   There are addi-
 tional mines downstream from Craig, approximately eight to ten miles south-
 west of town in Moffat County.  Two of these are surface and  one is
 underground.   An additional surface mine exists 28 miles southwest of Craig.
 These are currently small  producers (0.25 - 0.4 million tons  per year) with
 plans for up to three million tons by 1980.

    Colorado Ute Electric Association has plans for start-up  of a large (350
-  1,520 Megawatts) coal-fired electric generating facility just south of
 Craig.  This would be a major additional source of  pollution, possibly
confounding and/or camouflaging impacts from mining pollution.   This  will
make mining impacts extremely difficult to detect if  the facility is at the
                                   150
-------
                       TABLE 46.   RATING OF CANDIDATE STUDY SITES ON SELECTION CRITERIA^
Ul
Crlterl«(b)
Quantity of Coal Mining
(0 - little, 1 - very much)
Relative Importance of Coal Mining
(0 - minor importance, 1 - major Importance)
Clarity of Mining/Water Impact Status
(0 • uncertain, 1 " very clear)
Quality of Water Monitoring Data
(0 - poor, 1 • excellent)
Quality of Air Monitoring Data
(0 - none, 1 - some)
Proximity to Other Sites
(0 - near. 1 - distant)
Availability of Other Information Sources
(0 - not available, 1 • available)
Presence of Coal-Burning Power Plant
(0 • present, large; 0.5 - present,
email; 1 » absent)
STUDY COMMUNITIES
Craig. CO Hay den, CO
1 1

1 1

0.5 1

1 0.5

1 1

1 1

1 1

0 0


Range ly, CO
0

0,4

0.5

0.5

1

1

1

0.5


CONTROL
Canon City, CO
0

0

1

0

1

0

0

1


COMMUNITIES
Steamboat Springs, CO
1

0

1

0

1

1

1

1


                                                  (continued)
-------
                                                 TABLE  46.   (Continued)
                                        (b)                       	CONTROL COMMUNITIES	
                  	Crlt"*«	Keanerer, Iff Rock Springe.  Iff  Sheridan. HY

                   Quantity of 'Coal Mining                              1              i                 i
                     (0  •  little. 1 - very much)

                   Relative Importance of Coal Mining                   In,                 i
                     (0  -  minor importance, 1 • major Importance)

                   Clarity of Mining/Water Impact Status                1              i                 i
                     (0  -  uncertain, 1 • very clear)
Quality of Water Monitoring Data 0.5 1
(0-- poor, 1 • excellent)
Quality of Air Monitoring Data 0 l
(0 • none, 1 » some)
Proximity to Other Sites 1 i
(0 - near, 1 - distant)
Availability of Other Information Sources 1 1
(0 - not available, 1 - available)
Presence of Coal-Burning Power Plant 0 0.5
(0 - present, large; 0.5 - present,
small; 1 • absent)
0.5
1
0
0.5
0.5
(a)   Details of the criteria can be found in the  text.

(b)   All  Iturns are scaled with larger values Indicative of greater desirability.
-------
mine mouth and/or located upstream from the drinking water intake.   Agri-
culture is the only other activity which contributes significantly  to the
economy.

    Surface water quality monitoring is fairly thorough on the Yampa River
near Craig.  There are three monitors within 11 miles of town, all  of which
measure several mineral parameters and toxic metals.  There are many addi-
tional monitors on the river further downstream.  The air quality monitor in
Craig measures nitrates and sulfates as well as total suspended particulates
(TSP) and benzene soluble organic fraction (BSOF).  Overall, the environ-
mental quality monitoring is relatively comprehensive in Craig as compared
to other communities under consideration.

    Review of other data sources pertaining to this area indicates  that the
United States Bureau of Land Management has published an Environmental
Impact Statement and Supplement concerning northwestern Colorado (U.S. Dept.
of the Interior, 1976).  This region includes Craig, Hayden, Steamboat
Springs, and Rangely.  This document would be valuable in identifying
features of the community pertinent to an epidemiological study, such as
current environmental quality and socioeconomic characteristics.

    Craig is located in the cluster of candidate communities in northwestern
Colorado and southwestern Wyoming.  Therefore, it would be well matched with
other communities within this cluster in terms of climate, geography, etc.
Also, it would be easily accessible from any of the other communities except
Sheridan, Wyoming, and Canon City, Colorado.

    In summary, Craig's only major detriment is that it is not close to the
mining activity that would potentially impact its drinking water supply,
tending to dilute its status as a study vs. a control site.   The mining in
the area does constitute a significant portion of the community's economy,
its major competitors being agriculture and electricity generation.  The
environmental monitoring activity is comparatively good.  It is in  a favor-
able location relative to other potential study sites, and the United States
Bureau of Land Management's Comprehensive Environmental Impact Statement
would be quite useful.

Hayden, Routt County, Colorado—
    Routt County is located in northwestern Colorado.  The county population
is almost exclusively white (over 99 percent).  The median age in the county
is 28.5 years; this is-fairly typical of the eight communities under con-
sideration.  Hayden,  with a population of 1,338 in 1975, is located in the
west-central portion of the county.  It grew very rapidly between 1970 and
1975 (14.4 percent annually).  The per capita income in the community,
$5,492, is relatively high compared to the other mining communities and the
state as a whole.

    As was mentioned in the discussion of Craig, there are 18 mines in Routt
County.  All but three of these mines are located between 0.5 and three
miles upstream from Hayden on the Yampa River drainage system.  Nine of
those mines on the Yampa River drainage system are surface.   The other three
                                    153;
-------
mines, two surface and one underground, are approximately one and one-half
miles south of Craig.  Currently, the mines in the county produce around ten
million tons per year.  Production is estimated to increase to 15 million
tons per year by the early 1980's.

    Other industries which contribute significantly to the economy of Routt
County are agriculture, coal-based electricity production, and recreation.
There Is a great deal~of"nearby mining which is directly upstream of
Hayden's drinking water supply.  However, these impacts might be hidden or
confounded by pollution from the generating facility,  if it is upstream from
the community.  Often these facilities are built at the mine mouth, and
waste products are stored in piles that would be vulnerable to leaching
toxic substances into the water.  Air pollution from the generating facility
would also have a potential impact on the health of the residents.  In addi-
tion, the generating facility Is a significant competitor for the town's
labor resources.

    All surface water quality parameters of interest are monitored eight
miles upstream and two miles downstream from Hayden.  There are a number of
other monitors at various intervals upstream, but there is no regularity to
the measurements taken.  A monitor 0.3 miles downstream analyzes for all the
toxic metals of interest.   The air quality monitor in the area analyzes for
only TSP and BSOF.  The overall environmental surveillance seems adequate
relative to other communities.

    Hayden is in a location that would be easily accessible from all the
other communities under consideration except Sheridan, Wyoming, and Canon
City, Colorado.  This would facilitate travel among study sites and matching
of communities.

    The Northwest Colorado Environmental Impact Statement and Supplement by
the United States Bureau of Land Management (U.S. Dept. of the Interior,
1976) provides much information concerning Hayden that would be useful in
planning an epidemlological study.

    From these criteria it appears that Hayden would be a desirable study
site.  The only major potentially negative factor that must be considered is
the influence of a large electric generating facility.

Rangely, Rio Blanco County, Colorado—
    Rio Blanco County is located in northwestern Colorado, and Rangely is
located in the northwestern part of the county.  Approximately two-thirds of
its 5,349 inhabitants reside in the two communities of Meeker and Rangely.
The population is almost 99 percent white and somewhat younger than the
population in the other communities under consideration (the median age
being 26.9 years).  Rangely's population of 1,792 (1975) residents increased
at an annual rate of 2.4 percent between 1970 and 1975.  This growth rate is
slightly lower than that for the state of Colorado as a whole.  Per capita
income in Rangely is $4,526.
                                    154
-------
	   Tnere  are three identified mines  in Rio Blanco County.  Only one of
 these mines is in  the vicinity of Rangely.  This mine is approximately five
 miles upstream from Rangely,  situated on a major tributary of the White
 River.   It is  expected  to  increase  its production gradually with a goal of
 3.7  million tons per year  by  1990.  Included  in this mining complex are two
 underground and one surface mine.   Two other  mines are located in the
 eastern portion of the  county near  Meeker.  Other energy-related activities
 near Rangely  may include an oil shale mine and plant and a coal-fired
 electricity generating  facility.  Plans for both of these operations are
 tentative  with indefinite  start-up  dates.  At the present time, mining and
 agriculture are the only major economic activities in Rio Blanco County.

     The only  surface water monitor  which would provide information useful
 for  a study is four miles  upstream  from Rangely, between the community's
 water intake  and the mine.  This monitor is analyzing all pertinent para-
 meters  except  nitrates.  There are  other monitors on the White River, but
 they are too  far upstream  from Rangely to be  of use.  The air quality moni-
 tor  in  the vicinity of  Rangely is providing information on nitrates and
 sulfates as well as TSP and BSOF.   Overall, the environmental quality inform-
 ation is adequate  relative to other sites, although it would be useful to
 have surface water quality data from  directly upstream of the mine.

     The cluster of communities in northwestern Colorado and southwestern
 Wyoming includes Rangely.  Therefore, Rangely would be readily accessible
 from any of these  communities and fairly well matched with them in terms of
 such parameters as altitude,  geography, and climate.  Rangely is also in-
 cluded  in  the Environmental Impact  Statement  covering northwestern Colorado
 by the  United States Bureau of Land Management (U.S. Dept. of the Interior,
 1976).

     In  summary, Rangely's  status as a study community is adequately clear,
 although a larger  amount of mining  would have a greater and thus more
 readily detectable impact.  There is  little other activity in the area to
 confound the  study as the  plans for oil shale mining and electricity pro-
 duction are very tentative and are  not expected to be pursued in the near
 future.  The environmental data is  not as complete as would be desired.
 There is published information available concerning the area, and it is
 close to most  of the other communities under  consideration.

 Canon City, Fremont County, Colorado—
     Canon  City is  a community with  approximately 13,000 residents located in
 central Colorado.   Between 1970 and 1975 its  population grew at an annual
 rate of 3.1 percent, which is very  similar to the growth rate for the entire
 state of Colorado  (2.9  percent).  The per capita income was only $3,658 in
 1974, lower than the state average  of $4,030.  Fremont County has a popula-
 tion which is  fairly old (median age  of 35.9) and- almost exclusively white
 (98.2 percent).  Approximately half the residents of Fremont County live in
 Canon City.  Mining activities in the vicinity of Canon City are concen-
 trated  approximately ten miles to the southeast, directly south of Florence
 and  east of the San Isabel National Forest.   A total of ten mines were
 determined to  be active in the area according to the sources described
                                     155
-------
earlier..  There is approximately an even mix of surface and underground
mines and all are of moderate size.   The largest estimated annual tonnage
for any mine is 0.07 million tons, and both current and future total annual
tonnages for the region are only 0.1 million tons.   This makes Canon City
one of the least desirable sites in terms of coal production.   Furthermore,
the population is large (for this part of the state) and somewhat distant
from the mines.  According to the criteria outlined earlier, both of these
factors tend to dilute the impact of"coal mining, and thus discourage
selection of Canon City as a study site.

    Canon City's designation as being free of coal mining impacts on
drinking water is quite clear.  The drinking water intake is located a short
distance upstream from town on the Arkansas River,  while drainage from the
mined areas enters the Arkansas River more than five miles downstream from
Canon City.

    Water quality monitoring on the Arkansas River near Canon City is rather
poor.  Although there are three monitors within ten miles, and one within
one mile, none analyze for toxic metals.  Only the most basic mineral char-
acteristics of the water are reported.  An air quality monitor located in
Canon City records TSP (total suspended particulates) and BSOF (benzene
soluble  organic fraction).

    Relative to other study site candidates, Canon City is isolated.  The
nearest community on the list is over 200 miles away, which would be a major
inconvenience in executing a field study of Canon City and another
community.

    Finally, a search for other data sources specifically relevant to the
Canon City area produced virtually no information.   This seems to reflect
the impression that this part of the west is not a critical element in coal
energy development.

    Overall, the only major desirable features of Canon City as an investi-
gation site are the clarity of its designation as a control site and pres-
ence of an air quality monitor.   The undesirable features include relatively
distant and small coal mines, large population, little surface water analy-
sis, and absence of any useful site-specific studies.

Steamboat Springs, Routt County, Colorado—
    Steamboat Springs is located in the east-central portion of Routt County
which is in northwestern Colorado.  The median income in Steamboat Springs,
$6,219, is substantially higher than that in the other communities under
consideration as well as the state as a whole.  The population of the com-
munity grew 5.5 percent annually between 1970 and 1975.   Routt County's
population is almost exclusively white (over 99 percent).  The age distri-
bution in the county is similar to that for most of the other communities,
the median age being 28.5 years  with 9.7 percent of the population over 65.

    There is extensive mining in Routt County approximately one to three
miles west (downstream) of Steamboat Springs.  Consequently, its status as a
                                    156
-------
control community is unequivocal.  The mines in the county are currently
producing approximately ten million tons per year, and it is estimated that
they will be producing 15 million tons per year by the early 1980's.   A
significant proportion of the economy in Steamboat Springs is derived from
the recreation business, as the community is basically a ski resort area.
The relatively transient population in resort areas makes them undesirable
candidates for an epidemiologic study.  Agriculture also has a significant
role in the economic activities of~the area.

    Steamboat Springs takes its public water supply from the Fish Creek, a
tributary of the Yampa River.  There is a monitoring station on Fish Creek
approximately two miles downstream from the community's water intake.  The
monitor is located Just upstream from the confluence of the two streams.
This monitor is measuring only three of the water quality parameters under
consideration:  pH, nitrates, and sulfates.  There are numerous monitoring
sites on the Yampa River downstream from Steamboat Springs.  However, since
the Fish Creek is not a major tributary of the river, information provided
by Yampa River monitors would not provide information specific to this com-
munity.  Air quality parameters measured in the area of Steamboat Springs
are nitrates, sulfates, TSP, and BSOF.   -         -        -

    The Northwestern Colorado Environmental Impact Statement by the United
States Bureau of Land Management (U.S. Dept. of the Interior, 1976) contains
information concerning the area of Steamboat Springs that would be very use-
ful in designing and implementing an epidemiologic study.  In addition,
Steamboat Springs is in a favorable location relative to most of the other
communities under consideration, as part of the cluster of communities in
northwestern Colorado and southwestern Wyoming.

    Although there are several factors concerning Steamboat Springs that
make it attractive as a control site (location, amount and location of
mining, availability of supplemental data), there are also conditions which
are undesirable in epidemiological studies, most specifically the transient
population consequent to the resort activity.

Green River, Sweetwater County, Wyoming—
    Sweetwater County is in the southwestern portion of Wyoming.  Its popu-
lation is 97.5 percent white, and the age distribution of the population is
similar to that of the other areas under consideration as study sites, the
median age being 28.9 years with 9.6 percent of the population over 65.
Most of the 30,000 residents of Sweetwater County live in either Green River
or Rock Springs.  Green River's population in 1975 was 7,423.  The community
grew rapidly between the years of 1970 and 1975 (almost 15 percent annual-
ly).  The median income in 1974 was $4,937, which is somewhat higher than
the median income for the state as a whole ($4,566).

    There are three surface mines in Sweetwater County which will have an
estimated production of approximately 13 million tons per year by 1984.
Three underground mines in the county will not be contributing significantly
to this production.  The mining is located east of Green River in the cen-
tral part of the county (one mine being located in the extreme eastern
                                     157
-------
part of the county).   The drainage from all the mining areas flows into
completely different  systems of streams than the one  from which Green River
takes its water supply.  Consequently, the drinking water in this community
will not be impacted  by the mining.   Mining is the primary economic activity
in the county; manufacturing and agriculture also contribute substantially.
The percent of the county population employed in mining,  manufacturing, and
agriculture is 19.2,  8.1, and 3.8 percent, respectively,  with 38.0 percent
of the total"county population employed.

    The water monitoring activity on the Green River  (from which the
community of Green River takes its public water supply) is satisfactory.
The dissolved minerals of interest (calcium, magnesium, sodium, and sulfate)
are measured 4.4 miles upstream and 2.5 miles downstream  from the intake
point.  The monitor 2.5 miles downstream also provides data on the toxic
metals of interest (cadmium, chromium, arsenic, copper, and lead).  Infor-
mation on these metals from upstream is only provided by  a monitor 50 miles
away.  There are many other monitors both upstream and downstream which are
analyzing for the minerals of interest.  Total suspended  particulates (TSP)
is the only relevant air quality parameter which is being measured in the
vicinity-of Green River.          —  - - —• —   -

    There are two sources of supplemental information on  Green River:  the
Southwestern Wyoming Environmental Impact Statement by the United States
Bureau of Land Management (U.S. Dept. of the Interior, 1978) and United
States Geological Survey Hydrology and Economic Development Report (Lowham
et al., 1976).  This  information would prove very useful  in designing and
implementing an epidemiologlc study.

    Another desirable feature of the Green River area is  that it is part of
the cluster of communities in southwestern Wyoming and northwestern
Colorado.  Therefore, it would be easily accessible from  all of the other
communities under consideration except Sheridan, Wyoming, and Canon City,
Colorado.

    A negative influence on Green River's desirability as a control site for
an epidemiologic study is its size.   Its population is more than twice as
large as most of the other communities under consideration.  This is also
reflected in the percentage of the county population  employed in
manufacturing.  The extent'of the impact of community size and the manu-
facturing industry will depend on the type and amount of  manufacturing
located within the. community.  An industry with extensive pollution
potential would be a problem in that impacts of this  pollution would
camouflage the presence or absence of mining impacts.

Kemmerer, Lincoln County, Wyoming—
    Lincoln County is located in the southwest corner of  Wyoming.  Its
population of approximately 10,000 residents is almost 100 percent white and
somewhat younger than the population of other areas under discussion, the
median age being 26.7 years.  Kemmerer is located in  the  south-central
portion of the county.  The population of Kemmerer grew at a rate of 3.0
percent annually between 1970 and 1975 to reach a 1975 population of 2,658.
                                    158
-------
Its per capita Income In 1974 was $4,478.  Both Kemmerer's growth rate and
per capita Income are very  close to those figures for the state as a whole
(2.6 percent and $4,566, respectively).

    There are four large surface mines in Lincoln County 6-12 miles
southwest of Kemmerer.  The drainage from the mined area enters the stream
supplying Kemmerer's drinking water downstream from the intake point.  Thus,
Kemmerer is clearly not mining/water impacted.  The current production of
4 million tons per year is  expected to increase to 9 1/2 million tons per
year in the near future.  Agriculture is the other major economic activity in
the area of Kemmerer.  There is a coal-based electricity generating facility
in the vicinity of Kemmerer, which is expected to double its output in
the near future.  This additional source of pollution would make iso-
lation of mining Impacts difficult if the facility is upstream from the
intake for the community's  water supply.  In such a location, the facility
would have a potential impact on the water supply that would be labeled
"nonimpacted" for the purposes of the study.

    There are two surface water quality monitors near Kemmerer; one
is 20 miles upstream and one is 3 miles downstream.  Neither monitor ana-
lyzes all the parameters of interest.  The monitor upstream provides
information on all the minerals but none on toxic metals.  The other pro-
vides data on all the toxic metals and most of the minerals.  There is
no air quality monitoring activity in the area.

    There are two useful sources of information and data specific to Kemmerer.
These include the Southwestern Wyoming Evironmental Impact Statement by the
U.S. Bureau of Land Management (U.S. Dept. of the Interior, 1978), U.S.
Geological Survey Hydrology and Economic Development Report (Lowham et al.,
1976).  Information provided in these documents would be extremely useful
in designing and implementing an epidemiological study.

    Kemmerer is located in  a position relative to the other communities
that make it easily accessible from all areas except Sheridan, Wyoming
and Canon City, Colorado.

    Although the environmental monitoring in the area of Kemmerer
is not completely satisfactory, it alone would not be a basis for exclu-
sion.  However, the question of the effect of the electricity generating
facility is extremely important and needs to be examined further.  Other
factors such as the amount  of mining and the availability of supplemental
information are positive influences in Kemmerer's desirability as a study
site.

Rock Springs, Sweetwater County, Wyoming—
    Rock Springs is approximately in the center of Sweetwater County,
which is located in southwestern Wyoming.  Of the 30,144 inhabitants of
Sweetwater County, 17,773 (over half) reside in Rock Springs.  The population
of the country is 97.5 percent white, the median age is 29.9 with 9.6 percent
of the population over 65.  The median income of the residents of Rock Springs
is $4,358.  The community grew at _an annual rate of 10.0 percent between 1970


                                     159
-------
 and 1975.  The growth rate of Rock Springs Is considerably higher than that
 value for the state as a whole (2.6 percent).

     There are three surface mines  in Sweetwater County which  will have an
 estimated production of 13 million tons per year by 1984.   The three
 underground mines  in the county will not be contributing significantly to
 this production.   The mining is located to the north,  east, and south  of
 Bock Springs.  Since Rock Springs  takes its water supply from the same
 source as Green River, its drinking water will not be  impacted by the
 mining.   As was mentioned in the discussion of Green River, the drainage
 from the mined areas flows into systems of streams that are completely
 separate from the  stream supplying drinking water to the two  communities.

     The  three major economic activities in the county  are  mining,  manu-
 facturing, and agriculture;  19.2,  8.1,  and 3.8 percent of  the population are
 employed in each of these areas, respectively.   It is  reasonable  to  assume
 that most of the manufacturing activity is taking place in the community of
 Rock Springs, since a large  proportion  of  the county population is
 concentrated there.   This could present a  problem,  depending  on the  nature
 of  the manufacturing.   If the manufacturing pollutes the area  sufficiently
 to  produce health  impacts, it would be  difficult  to  attribute  the  presence
 or  absence of health effects directly to the mining  activity.   In  addition,
 the size of Rock Springs  is  very atypical  of the  communities under
 consideration as study sites.   The  relatively larger amount of  traffic and
 different social environment of a  larger community could have  a significant
 impact on the health  of the  residents.

     The  surface water  quality monitoring pertinent  to  Rock Springs is the
 same as  that for Green River,  since  the two  communities share  the  same water
 supply.   As  was discussed with respect  to  Green River,  this monitoring
 activity is satisfactory  but not ideal.  There are  three air quality moni-
 tors in  the area of Rock  Springs.  Total suspended particulates (TSP) is the
 only relevant air quality parameter measured  by each of them.

     There are two sources of  supplemental  information concerning the area of
 Rock Springs:  the Southwestern Wyoming Environmental Impact Statement  by
 the  United  States Bureau  of Land Management  (U.S. Dept. of  the Interior,
 1978)  and  the United States  Geological  Survey Hydrology and Economic
 Development Report (Lowham et al., 1976).  Rock Springs is  part of the
cluster of communities in southwestern Wyoming and northwestern Colorado.
Both of  these points are  positive factors concerning the choice of Rock
Springs as a control site for an epidemiological study.  Other assets are
the  amount and location of mining in the area, but the size of Rock Springs
makes  it rather undesirable.

Sheridan, Sheridan County, Wyoming—
    Sheridan County is located in north-central Wyoming. Its  population is
mostly white.  The  residents in the county are considerably older than  in
most areas under consideration as study sites.  The median  age is 36.8, and
15.9 percent of the population is over 65.   About 60 percent of the county's
19,924 inhabitants  reside in the community of Sheridan.  This  community grew
                                     160
-------
at a much slower rate than other communities under consideration as well as
the state as a whole.  Between 1970 and 1975 the annual growth rate was  only
1.3 percent annually.  The per capita income for the community of Sheridan
($4,551) is very similar to that for the state as a whole ($4,566).

    The 11.5 million tons of coal mines per year in the vicinity of Sheridan
are taken from five surface mines.  This production is expected to increase
to a total of 47 million-tons of coal per year by 1985.  This mining is
located between approximately six and 30 miles downstream from the community
of Sheridan.  Since the community takes its water supply from several miles
upstream, the mining will have no impact on its drinking water supply.
Agriculture is the only other major economic activity in the county.  There
is a small amount of manufacturing in the county which is most likely
located in the community of Sheridan.

    A medium sized coal-fired electricity generating facility is being
constructed in the area of Sheridan.  As has been discussed, pollution from
such a facility may camouflage or confound mining impacts.

    The closest surface water quality monitoring activity to the community
of Sheridan is approximately one mile downstream.  At this site, and another
one seven miles upstream from the community, measures of pH, nitrates, hard-
ness, calcium, magnesium, sodium, and sulfates are taken.  The nearest
monitor providing data on concentrations of the toxic metals of interest is
almost 11 miles downstream from the community of Sheridan.  The only
relevant air quality parameter being measured in this area is TSP.

    With Sheridan serving as a control site, travel between study site and
control site would be difficult and time consuming, as Sheridan is many
miles from any of the other communities under consideration.  All of the
candidate communities except Sheridan, Wyoming, and Canon City, Colorado are
close enough together that travel between-any pair of them would be
relatively easy.

    There are two sources of data concerning the area of Sheridan:  Effects
of Coal Strip Mining on Water Quality (Dettman et al. , 1976) and Land
Reclamation Annual Report (Carter et al. , 1978).  These would be of some use
in designing and implementing an epideiniologic study.

    In summary, there are several factors which make Sheridan attractive as
a choice of a control site in an epidemiological study.  The mining in the
area is extensive and will clearly have no impact on the community's water.
In addition, mining is a relatively large part of the community's economy.
However, there is a medium sized coal-fired electricity generating facility
in the area; the surface water quality data as well as sources of additional
information are of limited use; and Sheridan is not' in a desirable geo-
graphic location for a study such as the one under consideration.
                                    161
-------
                                 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anonymous,  1977.  REA Industrial Conversion List Unveiled.  Coal Outlook
   (newsletter), Observer Publ. Co., Washington, D.C.  (Editorial, May 16).

Asbury, J. G., H. T. Kim, and A. Kouvalis.  1977.  Survey of Electric Utility
   Demand for Western Coal.  Argonne National Laboratory, ANL/SPG-1, Argonne,
   IL.  74 pp.

Averitt, P.  1975.  Coal Resources of the United States, January 1, 1974.
   U.S. Geol. Surv. Bull. 1412.  131 pp.

Berg, J. W. and F. Burbank.  1972.  Correlations Between Carcinogenic Trace
   Metals in Water Supplies and Cancer Mortality.  Ann. N.Y. Acad. N.Y.
   Acad. Sci.  199:249-264.

Bozzo, S. R., F. Galdos, K. M. Novak, and L. D. Hamilton.  1978.  Medical
   Data Base:  A Tool for Studying the Relationship of Energy-Related Pollu-
   tants to 111 Health,  Brookhaven National Laboratory, Associated Univer-
   sities, Inc., BNL-50840, Upton, NY.  347 pp.

Brown, B. S.  1977.  The Impact of the New Boom Towns:  The Lessons of Gillette
   and the Powder River Basin.  New Dimensions in Mental Health, Education,
   and Welfare, Public Health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health
   Administration, DHEW Publication No. (ADN) 77-514, Rockville, MD.  10 pp.

Burton, A. C. and J. F. Cornhill.  1977.  Correlation of Cancer Death Rates
   with Altitude and with the Quality of Water Supply of the 100 Largest
   Cities in the United States.  J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 3:465-478.

Calabrese, E. J. and R. W. Tuthill.  1977.  Elevated Blood Pressure and High
   Sodium Levels in the Public Drinking Water.  Arch. Environ. Health
   32:200-202.

Carter, R. P.,  R. R. Hinchman, and D. 0. Johnson.  1978.  Land Reclamation
   Program Annual Report July 1976 - October 1977.  Argonne National Labora-
   tory, Argonne, Illinois,  pp. 12-30.

Cassel, J., R.  Patrick, and D. Jenkins.  1960.  Epidemiological Analysis of
   the Health Implications of Culture Change:  A Conceptual Model.  Ann. N.Y.
   Acad. Sci.  84(17):938-949.
                                     162
-------
Cassel, J.  1976.  The Contribution of the Social Environment to Host
   Resistance.  Amer. J. Epidemiol.  104(2):107-123.

Comar, C. L. and L. A. Sagan.  1976.  Health Effects of Energy Production
   and Conversion.  Ann. Rev. Energy 1:581-600.

Corsentino, J. S.  1976.  Projects to Expand Fuel Sources in Western States:
   Survey of Planned or Proposed Coal, Oil Shale, Tar Sand, Uranium, and
   Geothermal Supply Expansion Projects, and Related Infrastructure, in States
   West of the Mississippi River (as of May 1976).  U.S. Bur. Mines Info.
   Circ.  8719.  208 pp.

Denver Research Institute.  1975.  Factors Influencing an Area's Ability to
   Absorb a Large-Scale Commercial Coal-Processing Complex:  A Case Study of
   the Fort Union Lignite Region.  Denver Research Institute, Denver, Co.
   292 pp.

Dettman, E. H., R. D. Olsen, and W. S. Vinikour.  1976.  Effects of Coal
   Strip Mining on Stream Water Quality:  Preliminary Results.  In:  Sixth
   Symposium on Coal Mine Drainage Research, October 19-20-21, 1976,
   Louisville, KY, National Coal Association, Washington, D.C.  pp. 51-63.

Dvorak, A. J., C. D. Brown, E. H. Dettman, and others.  1977.  The Environ-
   mental Effects of Using Coal for Generating Electricity.  U.S. Nuclear
   Regulatory Commission, Division of Site Safety and Environmental Analysis,
   NUREG-0252, Washington, D.C.  299 pp.

Eyer, J.  1977.  Properity as a Cause of Death.  Intern. J. Health Serv.
   u(l):125-150.

Gilmore, J. S. and M. K. Duff.  1975.  Boom Town Growth Management:  A Case
   Study of Rock Springs-Green River, Wyoming.  Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
   177 pp.

Gilmore, J. S. , K. D. Moore, D. Hammond, and D. Coddington.  1976.  Analysis
   of Financing Problems in Coal and Oil Shale Boom Towns.  Denver Research
   Institute, Denver, CO.  253 pp.  (NTIS, PB-259 438)

Hanks, J. W., K. A. Miller, and J. M. Uhlmann.  1977.  "Boom Town" Interdis-
   ciplinary Human Services Project.  Paper presented to Converence of
   National Association of Social Workers, held in San Diego, California,
   22 November 1977.  12 pp.

Lowham, H. W., L. L. DeLong, K. D. Peter, D. J. Wangsness, W. J. Head, and
   B. H. Ringen.  1976.  A Plan for Study of Water and Its Relation to
   Economic Development in the Green River and Great Divide Basins in Wyoming.
   U.S. Department of the Interior, Geological Survey, Open-File Report
   76-349, Cheyenne, WY.  92 pp.

Morris, S. C. and K. M. Novak.  1977.  Data Book for the Quantification of
   Health Effects from Coal Energy Systems.  Brookhaven National Laboratory,
   Associated Universities, BNL-23606, Upton, NY.  44 pp. (Draft)

                                     163
-------
Morton, W. E.  1971.  Hypertension and Drinking Water Constituents in
    Colorado,  Amer. J. Public Health  61(7):1371-1378.

National-Academy of Sciences, Environmental Studies Board.   1974.   Rehabili-
    tation Potential of Western Coal Lands.  Ballinger Publ.  Co.,  Cambridge,
    MA.  198 pp.

National Academy of Sciences.  1977.  Summary Report:  Drinking Water and
    Health;  National Academy of Sciences,  National Research Council, Safe
    Drinking Water Committee, Washington, DC.   939 pp.

Neri, L. C., D. Hewitt, and G. B. Schreiber.   1974.  Can Epidemiology
    Elucidate the Water Story?  Amer. J. Epidemiol.  99(2):75-88.

Nielson, G. F., ed.  1977.  1977 Keystone Coal Industry Manual. McGraw-Hill
    Inc., New York.  Pp.  561-1113.

Northern Great Plains Research Program, Water Quality Subgroup. 1974.  Water
    Quality Subgroup Report Discussion Draft - Aug. 1974.  U.S. Environmental
    Protection Agency, Region VIII, Northern Great Plains Resources Program,
    Denver, CO.  530 pp.

Perry, H. M., Jr.  1972.  Hypertension and the Geochemical Environment.   Ann.
    N.Y.  Acad. Sci.  199:202-216.

Rail, D., chmn.  1977.  U.S. President's Committee on Health and Ecological
    Effects of Increased Coal Utilization.  U.S. Department of Health,
    Education and Welfare, National Institute of Environmental Health
    Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.  (Draft of eleven papers).

Rich, C. H., Jr.  1978.  Projects to Expand Energy Sources in the  Western
    United States - An update of Information Circular 8719.  U.S.  Bur. Mines
    Info. Circ.  8772.  U.S. Bur. Mines Info. Circ.  8772.  207 pp.

Richards, B.  1977.  Change Rides the Wyoming Range.  Washington Post, No.
    176:1-2.  (May 3)

Sagan, L. A.  1974.  Health Costs Associated with Mining, Transport and
    Combustion of Coal in the Steam-Electric Industry.  Nature 250:107-111.

Study Committee on the Potential for Rehabilitating Land Surface Mined for
    Coal in the Western'U.S. (SCPRL) 1974.  Environmental Studies  Board,
    National Academy of Sciences.  Ballinger Publishing Co., Cambridge,
    Mass.  Pp 41-48.

Uhlmann, J. M.  1977.  The Delivery of Human Services in Wyoming Boom Towns.
    University of Wyoming, Wyoming Human Services Project, Laramie, WY.   39
    pp.

U.S. Bureau of Mines.  1978.  Mineral Industry Location System (MILS) Data
    Base for Coal Mines Located in Federal Region VIII.  U.S. Department of
    The Interior, Bureau of Mines, Denver, CO.  (Computer printout).
                                     164
-------
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.  1973.  County and City
    Data Book 1972.  (A Statistical Abstract Supplement.)  U.S. Government
    Printing Office, Washington, DC.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.  1977a.  Current
    Population Reports Population Estimates and Projections:  1973 (Revised)
•--  and 1975 Population Estimates and 1972 (Revised) and 1974 Per Capital
	Income Estimates for Counties and Incorporated Places in Colorado.  U.S.
    Government Printing Office, Series P-25, No. 654, Washington, DC.  15
    pp.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.  1977b.  Current
    Population Reports Population Estimates and Projections:  1973 (Revised)
    and 1975 Population Estimates and 1972 (Revised) and 1974 Per Capital
    Income Estimates for Counties and Incorporated Places in Montana.  U.S.
    Government Printing Office, Series P-25, No. 674, Washington, DC.  12
    pp.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.  1977c.  Current
    Population Reports Population Estimates and Projections:  1973 (Revised)
    and 1975 Population Estimates and 1972 (Revised) and 1974 Per Capital
    Income Estimates for Counties and Incorporated Places in North Dakota.
    U.S. Government Printing Office, Series P-25, No. 682, Washington, DC.
    33 pp.

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.  1977d.  Current
    Population Reports Population Estimates and Projections:  1973 (Revised)
    and 1975 Population Estimates and 1972 (Revised) and 1974 Per Capital
    Income Estimates for Counties and Incorporated Places in Utah.  U.S.
    Government Printing Office, Series P-25, No. 692, Washington, DC.  13
    PP-

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.  1977e.  Current
    Population Reports Population Estimates and Projections:  1973 (Revised)
    and 1975 Population Estimates and 1972 (Revised) and 1974 Per Capital
    Income Estimates for Counties and Incorporated Places in Wyoming.  U.S.
    Government Printing Office, Series P-25, No. 698, Washington, DC.  11
    pp.

U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.  1969.  Air Quality
    Criteria for Particulate Matter.  U.S. Department of Health, Education,
    and Welfare, National Air Pollution Control Administration, Publ. No.
    49, Washington, DC.  225 pp.

U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Center for
    Health Statistics.  1975.  Vital Statistics of the United States.  Vol.
    II.  Mortality.  Pt. B.  U.S. Public Health Service Publication No.
    78-1102, Hyattsville, MD.  Various paging.
                                     165
-------
U.S. Department of the Interior.  1976.  Northwest Colorado Coal and
    Supplement.  Final Environmental Statement.  U.S. Department of the
    Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Washington, DC.  Various paging.

U.S. Department of the Interior.  1978.  Proposed Development of Coal
    Resources in Southwestern Wyoming.   Final Environmental Statement.   U.S.
    Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Hangement, Washington, DC.
—	Various paging. ~         	  ~                    '   ' ~

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Energy Activities.  1976.
    Existing and Proposed Fuel Conversion Facilities Summary.  U.S.
    Environmental Protection Agency,  Region VIII, Denver, CO.  57 pp.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  1977.  Drinking Water and Health,
    Recommendations of the National Academy of Sciences.  Fed. Reg.
    43(132):35764-35779.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  1978.  Inventory of Public Water
    Supplies - Computer Printout.  Inventory of Public Water Supplies for
    EPA Region VIII, Denver, CO.  U.S.  EPA Health Effects Research
    Laboratory, Field Studies Division, Cincinnati, OH.  (Unpublished)

U.S. Federal Energy Administration, Office of Coal.  1977.  Western Coal
    Development Monitoring System.  Quarterly Summary, August 1, 1977.   U.S.
    Federal Energy Administration, Energy Resource Development,
    FEA/G-77/306, Washington, DC.  29 pp.

U.S. Geological Survey.  1978a.  Proposed Mining and Reclamation Plan Spring
    Creek Mine, Spring Creek Coal Company (A Subsidiary of Northern Energy
    Resources Company, Inc.), Bighorn,  Montana.  Prepared in cooperation
    with Montana Department of State Lands.  U.S. Geological Survey, DES
    78-30, Washington, DC. Various paging.

U.S. Geological Survey.  1978b.  Coal Creek Mine, Campbell County, Wyoming,
    Proposed Mining and Reclamation Plan.  Draft Environmental Statement.
    U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.  Various paging.

U.S. Geological Survey.  1978c.  National Water Data Exchange (NAWDEX)  Site
    Directory.  Computer Printout of Active Surface and Groundwater
    Monitoring Stations.  U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division,
    Columbus, OH.  (Unpublished printout)

University of California, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory.  1978.  The
    Impacts of Increased Coal Use in the Rocky Mountain Region.  University
    of California, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory, Regional Studies
    Program, Los Alamos, NM.  247 pp. (Draft)

University of Wyoming.  (1978)  Wyoming Human Services Project. University
    of Wyoming, Information Brochure-'78, Laramie, WY.  12 pp.
                                     166
-------
White, I. L. , M. A. Chartock, R. L. Leonard and others.  1977. Energy from
    the West:  A Progress Report of a Technology Assessment of Western
    Energy Resource Development.  Vol. III. Preliminary Policy Analysis.
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Energy, Minerals, and
    Industry, EPA-600/7-77-072c, Washington, DC.  Pp. 961-1137.  (NTIS,
    PB-271 754)

Williams, R. R., N. L. Stegens, and J. W. Horn.  1977.  Patient interview
    study from the Third National Cancer Survey:  Overview of problems and
    potentials of these data.  J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 58(3):  519-524.
                                     167
-------
TABLE A-l.  CURRENT AND FUTURE COAL MINES IN COLORADO1
HIM and
Location
of Min« Type of HIM
Matklna1 Lignite Surface
N 39*47'
V 104*39'
Mel Martinet Surface
M 37*10*
V 107*16'
H
Farmer 'a Mine Underground
N 38*55'
V 107*46'
King Mine (6 mi. Underground
E. of Paonla
In Delta Co.)
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(•llllon tona/yr)
12.5 In 1983
0.25 in 1976
O.OS In 1977
0.25 In 1978
0.3 In 1980
1.0 In 1982
0.3 In 1980
Coal Analyala
Holat - 30Z
A»h - 301
Sulfur - 0.3-
0.4Z
Btu/lb -4,000
Molat - 4-51
Ash - 6-7Z
Sulfur - 0.4-
O.SZ
Btu/lb - 11,600-
12.090
Molat - 6-7Z
Ash - 3.2-5.4Z
Sulfur - 0.4-
0.6Z
Btu/lb - 11,500
Molat - 2.9-
6.1Z
Ash - 4.3-
8.1Z
Sulfur - 0.4-
1.2Z
Btu/lb - 12.900
t»ploy»ent(b)
Planned
Current Future
0 660
10
345
8(c> 175
                           (continued)
-------
                                                TABLE  A-l.   (Continued)
vo
Name and
Location
of Mine Type of Mine
Converse Underground
N 38B54'
W 107°37'
Old Blue Ribbon Underground
N 38°57'
W 107°32'
Station Creek Surface
N 39° 18'
W 104°17'
Unnamed (1 mi. Underground
E. of Somerset
in Gunnison
County)
Hawk's Nest East Underground
N 38°56'
W 107*28'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(million tons/yr)
1.5 in 1980
Potential
0.1 in 1976
0.01 in 1977
0.05 in 1980
1.0 in 1982
2.0 in 1980
0.2 in 1975
0.5 in 1978
0.75 in 1979
Employment
Coal Analysis Current
Sulfur - 0.4- 10
0.6%
Btu/lb - 12,000
Moist - 6.0- 10
6.9%
Ash - 3.2-
5.4%
Sulfur -0.4-
0.6%
Btu/lb - 12,700-
13, 100
Lignite 0
10
Ash - 6% 90
Sulfur - 0.4% (105 in
Btu/lb - 12,500
Planned
Future
85
10
66
600
150
1976)
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                              TABLE A-l.   (Continued)
•vl
O
Name and
Location
of Mine
Grizzly Creek
N 40C32'
W 106021'
Lorencito
N 37"08'
W 104*49'
Maxwell
N 37"10'
u 104°52'
McGinley
N 39"16'
W 108&32'
McKinley #1
(near FruiCa,
Mesa County)
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface 0.5 in 1979
2.0 in 1980
Underground 0.5 in 1981
1.0 in 1982
Underground 0.10 in 1978
0.25 in 1979
0.60 in 1980
Underground 0.25 in 1976
0.025-0.1 in 1978
0.25 maximum
Underground 0.1 in 1977
Coal Analysis
Moist - 20%
Ash - 102
Sulfur - 0.6-
0.7%
Btu/lb - 9,000
Moist - 6%
Ash - 9%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 13,700
Coking Coal
Moist - 8-9%
Ash - 8-9.8%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 12,500

Employment
Planned
Current Future
40
0 500
100
85
35
                                                     (continued)
-------
TABLE A-l.  (Continued)
Name and
Location
of Mine
•CMC
N 39°08'
W 108°20'
CMC 01
Mesa County
Wise Hill 05
N 40°26'
W 107039'
Colowyo
N 40°13'
W 107°50'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Underground 0.07 in 1975
0.15 in 1978
0.5 in 1979
Underground 1.4 in 1977
Start-up,
1976
Underground & 0.5 in 1975
Surface 0.4 in 1977
0.6 in 1980
Surface 0.25 in 1977
3.0 in 1980
Coal Analysis
Moist - 5-6%
Ash - 7-11%
Sulfur - 0.4-
0.6%
Btu/lb - 11,990-
13,010

Moist - 16.0%
Ash - 5.8%
Sulfur - 0.5%
Btu/lb - 10.600
Moist - 8.5-
23.3%
Ash - 2.7-
9.4%
Sulfur -0.2-
1.0%
Btu/lb - 10,500
Employment
Planned
Current Future
38
-------
                                   TABLE A-l.  (Continued)
Name and
Location
of Mine
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future
Unnamed (2 mines  Surface
  20 ml. S. of
  Craig, Moffat
  Co.;  14 mi. E.
  of Steamboat
  Springs, Routt
  County)
1.0 in 1980
75
Thompson Creek
If'a 1 & 3
N 39°19'
W 107°19'




Gordon
N 40°ir
W 108°43'

Peanut
N 38°56'
W 107°00'
Underground 01 0.035 in 1977
0.25 in 1978
0.5 in 1979
#3 0.035 in 1977
0.25 in 1978
0.5 in 1979


2 Underground 1.5 in 1980
1 Surface 2.3 in 1985
3.7 in 1990

Underground


Moist - 2.3- 12
3.62
Ash - 7.6-
14. 1Z
Sulfur - 0.6-
1.2%
Btu/lb - 12,800-
13,900
Moist - 13% 0
Ash - 9Z
Sulfur - 0.4%
Btu/lb - 11,100
Anthracite


320







700






                                           (continued)
-------
                                              TABLE A-l.   (Continued)
w,
Name and
Location
of Mine
Peacock
'N 37°17'
W 108003'
Lincoln
N 40°02'
W 104°57'
Mt. Gunnison
N 38°52'
W 107°26'
Bear
N 38°55'
W 107°27'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Underground 0.06 in 1978
Underground 0.2 in 1976
0.15 in 1977
Underground 0.5 in 1981
2.5 in 1985
Underground 0.13 in 1975
0.2 in 1977

Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future
Moist - 3.5-10.7%
Ash - 3.4-11.3%
Sulfur - 0.6-4.0%
Btu/lb - 11,400-
14,000
Moist - 23.5-
25.0%
Ash - 6.5-
8.5%
Sulfur - 0.3-
0.4%
Btu/lb - 9,100 -
9,500
Moist - 10.4%
Ash - 4.5%
Sulfur - 0.47
Btu/lb - 11,846
Moist - 4.5-7%
Ash - 2.8-
8.9%

70

51(0
                                                                  Sulfur - 0.4-
                                                                    1.0%
                                                                  Btu/lb - 12,170-
                                                                    13,690	
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                   TABLE A-l.  (Continued)
Name and
Location
of Mine
Allen
N 37*09'
W 104*59'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Underground 0.6 In 1975
Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future
W«>
Orchard Valley
N 38°52'
W 107839'
Underground
0.5 in 1976
0.5-0.7 in 1978
1.0 in 1980
Moist - 10-11%
Ash - 3-4%
Sulfur - 0.4-
  0.44%
Btu/lb - 12.000
Eagle Underground 0.2 in 1975 59
89
-------
                                               TABLE A-l.   (Continued)
•vj
Ui
Name and
Location
of Mine
Coal Basin
N 39°13'
W 107°21'
Rienau 02
N 40°07'
W 107°51'
Edna
N 40°20'
W 107°01'
Energy 02
N 40°23'
W 107°09'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Underground 0.1 in 1976
0.13 in 1979
Underground 1976 prep
£. Surface 0.04 in 1978
Surface 0.8 in 1975
1.1 in 1976
1.0 in 1979
0.85 in 1980
Surface 1.0 in 1976
1.1 in 1978
Coal Analysis
Moist - 4.2%
Ash - 9.7%
Sulfur - 0.7%
Btu/lb - 13,600-
15,150
Moist - 10-11%
Ash - 2.0-4.0%
Sulfur - 0.4%
Btu/lb - 13,200-
13,400
Moist - 7.7-
12.5%
Ash - 3.3-13.2%
Sulfur - 0.6-
1.2%
Btu/lb - 10,400-
12,000
Moist - 10%
Ash - 4.1-9%
Sulfur - 0.5%
Btu/lb - 11,300-
11,590
Employment
Planned
Current Future
65
-------
TABLE A-l.   (Continued)
Name and
Location
of Mine
Energy #3
N 40°23'
W 1070.021
Energy tfl
N 40°21'
W 107°03'
Sun
N 40°20'
W 107°20'
Coal Basin
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface 0.5 in 1975
0.5 in 1976
0.5 in 1978
Surface 1.7 in 1978
Underground Planned 0.3
Prep, plant >0.5 in 1976
Coal Analysis
Moist - 11%
Ash - 7.2-9%
Sulfur - 0.5%
Btu/lb - 10,820-
11,300
Moist - 5.7-
10.4%
Ash - 8-17.8%
Sulfur - 0.5-
0.6%
Btu/lb - 10,400-
11,380
Moist - 11%
Ash - 4.2-9.5%
Sulfur - 0.4-
0.5%
Btu/lb - 10,900-
11,600
Moist - 6%
Ash - 7%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 15,000
Employment
Planned
Current Future
37(c)

65

       (continued)
-------
                                              TABLE A-l.  (Continued)
•vj
-vt
Name and
Location
of Mine
Dutch Creek #1
N 39°11'
W 107°20'
Dutch Creek 82
N 39°llt
W 107°20'
L.S. Wood
N 39°12'
W 107021'
Nucla Strip
N 38°17'
W 108°35'
Seneca Strip tf2
N 40°26'
W 107°02'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Underground 0.1 in 1976
0.16 in 1979
Underground 0.2 in 1975
0.3 in 1976
0.32 in 1979
Underground 0.4 in 1975
0.3 in 1976
0.31 in 1979
Surface 0.1 in 1976
0.11 in 1979
Surface 0.7 in 1975
1.5 in 1978
Coal Analysis
Moist - 4.0%
Ash - 8.3%
Sulfur - 0.7%
Btu/lb - 14,000-
15,280
Moist - 4.0%
Ash - 8.3%
Sulfur - 0.7%
Btu/lb - 14,000-
15,280
Approximately
the same as
Dutch Creek Si
Moist - 6-8%
Ash - 9.4%
Sulfur - 0.8%
Btu/lb - 11,550
Moist - 8-10%
Ash - 9.5%
Sulfur - 0.5%
Btu/lb - 10,500-
11,130
Employment
Planned
Current Future
77
18(c)

                                                      (continued)
-------
                                               TABLE A-l.  (Continued)
00
Name and
Location
of Mine
Somerset
H 38°55'
W 107°28'
Unnamed
N 37°39'
W 104 "52 '
Ramey
N 37°18'
W 104°35'
Unknown
N 37°22'
W 104"57'
King
N 37°15'
W 108"05'
Pricco
N 37*11'
W 104°43'
Current and
Planned Future Employment
Production Planned
Type of Mine (million tons/yr) Coal Analysis Current Future
Underground 1.0 in 1976 Moist - 3.8- 280 *c)
1.0 in 1978 8.22
Ash - 6.7-12.0%
Sulfur - 0.4-
0.6%
Btu/lb - 12,070-
12,970
Surface 0.05-0.10 in 1979 Bituminous
Underground
Underground
Underground 0.02 in 1978 Moist - 2.4-4.6%
Ash - 2-7.3%
Sulfur - 0.15-1.2%
Btu/lb - 12,700-
14,000
Underground
                                                     (continued)
-------
TABLE A-l.   (Continued)
Name and
Location
of Mine
Highland
N 37°08'
W 104°27'
Nu Gap f 3
N 39°35'
W 107°39'
Current and
Planned Future Employment
Production Planned
Type of Mine (million tons/yr) Coal Analysis Current Future
Underground
Underground 0.001 in 1978 Moist - 3-42
Ash - 6%
Sulfur - 0.4-
0.5%
Btu/lb - 13.000
Unnamed
12 mi. W. of
Steamboat
Springs
Routt County
L.S. Wood, 03
N 39°11'
W 107°20'
Unknown
N 37°14'
W 104°4l'
Eureka
N 37°12'
W 104°41'
Surface &
Underground
Underground
Underground
       (continued)
-------
                                              TABLE A-l.  (Continued)
oo
o
Name and
Location
of Mine
Four Mile
N 39°24'
W 107°18'
Ullliarosfork *1
N 40°25'
W 107°38'
Unknown
N 37°14'
W 104°30'
Jewell
N 37°24'
W 104°40'
Cedar Canon
N 38°20'
W 105°11'
Current and
Planned Future Employment >
Production Planned
Type of Mine (million tons/yr) Coal Analysis Current Future
Underground
Surface
Underground
Surface 0.05 in 1977 Moist - 13.85%
Ash - 8.15%
Sulfur - 0.44%
Btu/lb - 9,207
Surface 0.002 in 1976 Moist - 9-10%
0.003 in 1977 Ash - 9.9%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 12,290
           Canon Monarch
           N 38°16'
           W 105°09'
Underground
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                              TABLE A-l.   (Continued)
oo
Name and
Location
of Mine
Twin Pines
N 38°20'
W 105°10'
Casselman
N 40°17'
W 104°36'
Blackbird
N 39°02'
W 108°18'
Farmer Mutual
N 39°13(
W 108830'
Caldirola //I
N 38°20'
W 105°10'
Bowie
N 38e55'
W 107°33'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr) Coal Analysis
Underground 0.045 in 1977 Moist - 8.9-11%
0.045 in 1978 Ash - 0.62
Sulfur - 7.3-
12. 8%
Btu/lb - 10,560-
12.080
Underground
Surface
Underground
Underground
Underground Moist -6.5%
Ash - 4.7%
Sulfur - 0.5%
Btu/lb - 13,600
Employment
Planned
Current Future






                                                     (continued)
-------
                                              TABLE A-l.  (Continued)
               Name and
               Location
               of Mine
Type of Mine
   Current and
 Planned Future
   Production
 (million tons/yr)
                                                        Employment
 Coal Analysis
         Planned
Current  Future
oo
          Christenson
          N 40°18'
          W 104*36'
Underground
           Bookcliff
           N  39°11'
           W  108°28'
Underground
           George  Cocharan
           N  39°14'
           W  108e31'
Underground
           Black Diamond
           N  38°17'
           W  105°09'
           Peabody Pit
           N 40°26'
           W 107°07'
          Quatro
          N  37°02'
          W  105°02'
          Morley
          N  37°02'
          W  104°30'
Surface
0.04A in 1976
0.06 in 1977
Moist - 8.9-13%
Ash - 7.9-17.1%
Sulfur - 0.3-
  0.6%
Btu/lb - 10,000-
  11.290	
Surface
Underground
Underground
                                                    (continued)
-------
                                            TABLE A-l.   (Continued)
                 Name and
                 Location
                 of Mine
Type of Mine
   Current and
 Planned Future
   Production
(million tons/yr)   Coal Analysis
                                                         Employment
          Planned
Current   Future
oo
            Canadian Strip
            N 40°41'
            W 106°06'
            Wilson Creek
            25 ml. So.  of
              Craig
            Moffat Co
Surface
Surface
Johnnie's
N 40°16'
W 107°02'
Prosperity
N 40°15'
W 104840'
McLaughlin
N 37°08'
W 104*30'
Sunlight
N 39°24'
W 107°19'
Apex V 2
N 40°18'
W 107°02'
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground 0.012 in 1978
Underground 0.10 in 1977
0.25 in 1980



Moist - 4-5.4%
Ash - 4-8.5%
Sulfur - 0.5-1.3%
Btu/lb - 13,500
Moist - 6-9.2%
Ash - 3-12.1%
Sulfur - 0.5-0.7%
Btu/lb - 12,400
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                               TABLE A-l.   (Continued)
00
Name and
Location
of Mine
Gunbarrel
N 40°01'
W 105*16'
Sunset
N 40°18'
W 10A°36'
Boyer Peacock
N 39*12'
W 108°29'
Grasso
N 39°13'
W 108*30'
Scran ton
N 39°47'
W 104'40'
Whitfl Ash
N 40°17'
W 104°36'
Coal Gulch
N 39°21'
W 108°42'
Hunter Gulch
N 39°18'
W 108°3A'
Current and
Planned Future Employment
Production Planned
Type of Mine (million tons/yr) Coal Analysis Current Future
Surface
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground 0.025 in 1978 Bituminous-
coking type
Underground
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                            TABLE A-l.   (Continued)
00
Ul
Name and
Location
of Mine
Bohlender
N 40°16'
W 104 °36'
Marr Prep P
N 40°43'
W 106°16'
Corcoran
N 39°14'
W 108°31'
Jarvis
N 39°13'
W 108°30'
Corley S & A
N 38°17'
W 105°10'
Buddy
N 40°17'
W 104°36'
Anclior ^1
N 39°19'
W 108°39'
Current and
Planned Future Employment
Production Planned
Type of Mine (million tons/yr) Coal Analysis Current Future
Underground
Proc. Plant
Underground
Underground
Surface
Underground
Underground
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                              TABLE A-l.   (Continued)
               Name and
               Location
               of Mine
Type of Mine
   Current and
 Planned Future
   Production
(million tons/yr)
                                                        Employment
Coal Analysis
         Planned
Current  Future
00
a\
           Golden Quality
           N 38°20'
           W
Underground
 Idle in 1976
  Moist -  9.9-10.7Z
  Ash - 7.4-10.AX
  Sulfur - 0.4-0.5%
  Btu/lb - 10,920
     11,400
Farmer
N 39° 20'
W 108°41'
Kannah Creek
N 39°00'
W 108°15'
Kelehen
N 39°20'
W 108°42'
Lane
N 39°21'
W 108°42'
Thomas
N 39°13'
W 108°30'
Unnamed
N 39"01
W 108°31'
Underground
Underground
Surface
Surface
Underground
Surface
                                                    (continued)
-------
                                            TABLE A-l.  (Continued)
oo
•vj
Name and
Location
of Mine
Tomahawk
N 38°55'
W 102°00'
Limon
N 39°21'
W 103°52'
G.E.C. S & A
N 38°18'
W 105*10'
Hastings
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface 0.08 in 1977
0.25 in 1978
Surface 0.3 in 1977
0.8 in 1978
Surface Joint output
with Black
Diamond to
total no more
than 0.1
Surface

Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future
Moist - 8-14%
Ash - 9.3%
Sulfur - 0.9%
Btu/lb - 11,600-
12,090
Moist - 33%
Ash - 11-17%
Sulfur - 0.17-
0.43%
Btu/lb - 7,000
Moist - 7.5-8.2%
Ash - 9.5-11.2%
Sulfur - 0.8-1.3%
Btu/lb - 11,160-
13,680
Bituminous




            6 mi.  SW of
             Florence
            Fr emon t __Cp_un_ty
            Canadian Strip
            N  40°44'
            W  106°18'
Surface
0.12 in 1977
Moist - 12.8-
  16.1%
Ash - 3.2-19.2%
Sulfur - 0.6-1.4%
Btu/lb - 10,500-
  11.160	
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                              TABLE A-l.  (Continued)
CD
oo
Name and
Location
of Mine
Hay Gulch
N 37°17'
W 108°03'
Del Agua Strip
N 37"21'
W 104°39'
Healey Strip
1.5 mi NW Agui-
lar
Las Animas Co.
Trapper (Craig)
N 40°27'
W 107°34*
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface 0.025 in 1978
0.05 in 1980
Surface Small
Surface 0.15 in 1978
Surface 0.4 in 1977
2.2 in 1979

Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future
Moist - 5-6%
Ash - 7-10%
Sulfur - 0.6-1.6%
Btu/lb - 11,800-
14,000

Moist - 2-3%
Ash - 8-9%
Sulfur - 0.6-
0.7%
Btu/lb - 12,256
Moist - 16%
Ash - 5.7%
Sulfur - 0.3-0.5%
Btu/lb - 9,500-
11,500




           Williams Fork
             Strip tf2
           N 40°28'
           W 107°34'
Surface
           Denton Strip
           N 40°18'
           W 107°20'
Surface
Idle
                                                                   Bituminous
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                               TABLE A-l.   (Continued)
OQ
vo
Current and
Name and Planned Future
Location . Production
of Mine Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Eilt's Property Surface then 0.15 in 1977
N 40°28' Underground 0.25 in 1978
W 107°09'
Hayden Gulch Surface 1.0 in 1978
10 mi. S of
Hayden
Routt County
Meadows ffl Surface
N A0°28'
W 107°09'
Red Cannon 01 Underground 0.005 in 1977
N 38°56'
W 107°58'
Newlin Creek Underground
N 38°18'
W 105°10'
Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future
Moist - 8%
Ash - 10%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 10,500-
12.000


Moist - 14.5%
Ash - 6.7%
Sulfur - 0.7%
Btu/lb - 12.000
Moist - 9.5%
Ash - 9.1%
Sulfur - i;6%
Btu/lb - 11,000-
12.500
                                                      (continued)
-------
                                                TABLE A-l.  (Continued)
vo
o
Name and
Location
of Mine
Eastside
N 39°36'
W 108°17'
McClane (test
site)
N 39°26'
W 108°47' .
Hawk's Nest
West 03
N 38°56'
W 107°28'
O.C. 02
N 38°55'
W 107°28'
Blue Flame
N 37°17'
W 108°03'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Underground 0.001 in 1977
0.008 in 1979
Underground
Underground 0.5 In 1978
0.75 In 1979
Underground 0.004 in 1978
Underground Very small
Coal Analysis
Moist - 3-4%
Ash - p-7%
Sulfur - 0.6-0.8%
Btu/lb - 12,700-
13,200

Moist - A. 4-7.1%
Ash - 3.2-9.1%
Sulfur - 0.3-0.5%
Btu/lb - 12,400-
13.400
Moist - 9.5-10.1%
Ash - 4.3-6.0%
Sulfur - 0.3-0.6%
Btu/lb - 11,500-
12,500
Moist - 3.8%
Ash - 3-5.9%
Sulfur - 0.7%
Btu/lb - 13,000-
14,000
Employment
Planned
Current Future





                                                      (continued)
-------
TABLE A-l.  (Continued)
Name and
Location
of Mine
Anchor-Tresner
Unit
N 39°19'
W 108°39'
Cameo
N 39021'
W 108°05'
Unnamed
N 40°34'
W 107807'
Blazer
N 40°34'
W 107°07r
Dawson Unit
N 40°29'
W 107°14'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Underground 0.125 in 1977
0.3 in 1978
Underground 1977 prep
0.5 in 1979
0.9 in 1980+

Underground 0.25 in 1977
Underground 0.1 in 1977
or 1978
2.0-4.0 max
Coal Analysis
Moist - 8%
(washed)
Ash - 8%
Sulfur - 0.6-
1.0%
Btu/lb - 12,000
Moist - 6-8%
Ash - 7-11%
Sulfur - 0.4-0.6%
Btu/lb - 12,500

Moist - 8-9%
Ash - 9-10%
Sulfur - 0.5-0.6%
Btu/lb - 10,500-
12,000
Moist - 7%
Ash - 8%
Sulfur - 0.5%
Btu/lb - 11,500
Employment
Planned
Current Future





       (continued)
-------
                                              TABLE A-l.  (Continued)
VO
Name and
Location
of Mine
Elder
N 38°09'
W 108'17'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Underground 0.001 in 1977
0.01 in 1978
Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future
Moist - 3%
Ash - 7-8Z
Sulfur -0.7%
Btu/lb - 13.806-
14.400
           (a)
           (b)
           (c)
Based on Bureau of Mines Information Circular 8772 (Rich, 1978); Bureau of Mines In-
formation Circular 8719 (Corsentino, 1976); Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nielson,
1977); Mineral Industry Location System (USBM, 1978).

Unless otherwise noted, employment figures are from Bureau of Mines Information Cir-
cular 8772 (Rich, 1978).

From Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nielson, 1977).
-------
                           TABLE A-2.  CURRENT AND FUTURE COAL MINES IN MONTANA
                                                                                (a)
vo
U)
Name and
Location
of Mine
East Decker
N 45°05'
W 106°53'
Rosebud
N 45°50'
W 106°35'
Sarpy Creek
N 45°49'
W 107°04'
Circle West
N 47°23' .
W 105°34'
Young's Creek,
Tanner Creek,
Squirrel Creek
Unnamed
N 45°03'
W 107°00'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mines (million tons/yr)
Surface 10.2 in 1976(?)
20.0 in 1981
Surface 9.2 in 1976
19.1 in 1980
Surface 6.5 in 1980
15.0 in 1982
Surface 5.0 in 1983
Surface 6.0 in 1980
16.0 in 1985
Coal Analysis
Moist - 24.1%
Ash - 4.3%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 9,700
Moist - 24.6%
Ash - 8.9%
Sulfur - 0.7%
Btu/lb - 8,703
Moist - 23%
Ash - 11%
Sulfur - 0.7%
Btu/lb - 8,500
Moist -34.9%
Ash - 6.9%
Sulfur - 0.5%
Btu/lb - 6,930
Moist -24%
Ash - 3.5%
Sulfur - 0.25%
Btu/lb - 9,400
(b)
Employment
Planned
Current Future
128(C) 435
275 1260
990
0 200
435
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                              TABLE A-2.  (Continued)
vo
•p-
Name and
Location
of Mine
Spring Creek
N 45°08'
W 106°53'
East Sarpy
Creek
N 45°55'
W 107°00'
McCartney
Dlaine Co.
Nance
Tongue River
Rosebud Co.
Absaloka
Big Horn Co.
Big Sky
N 45°49'
W 106"37'
Savage
Richland Co.
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface 10.0 in 1980
Surface Preliminary plan-
ning stages
Surface Preliminary plan-
ning stages
Surface Preliminary plan-
ning stages
Surface 4.0 in 1975
A.I in 1976
Surface , 2.1 in 1975
2.4 in 1976
Surface 0.3 in 1975
0.3 in 1976
Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future

•

Moist - 25. IX
Ash - 3.62
Sulfur - 0.35%
Btu/lb - 9,373
Moist - 23% 120(c^
Ash - 10%
Sulfur - 0.7%
Btu/lb - 8,450
Moist - 26.3% 25(c)
Ash - 10.4%
Sulfur - 0.75%
Btu/lb - 8,450
Moist - 27% 19
-------
                                           TABLE A-2.  (Continued)
               Name and
               Location
               of Mine
                   Type of Mine
   Current and
 Planned Future
   Production
(million tons/yr)
                    Employment
                          Planned
Coal Analysis    Current  Future
VO
tn
           Storm King
           N 46°15'
           W 108°26'
           Martin's Peat,
             Inc.
           N 47°50'
           W
PM Surface
N 45°49'
W 108°18'
           Unnamed
           N 45034'
           W 106*11'

           Unnamed
           N 46°16'
           W 108°27'
                   Underground
                   Surface
                              Surface
                   Surface
                   Surface
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                TABLE A-2.   (Continued)
Name and
Location
of Mine
Unnamed
M 46*16'
W 108°20'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface
Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future

(a)
(b)
(c)
Based on Bureau of Mines Information Circular 8772 (Rich, 1978); Bureau of Mines In-
formation Circular 8719 (Corsentino, 1976); Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nielson,
1977); Mineral Industry Location System (USBM, 1978).

Unless otherwise noted, employment figures are from Bureau of Mines Information Cir-
cular 8772 (Rich, 1978).

From Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nielson, 1977).
-------
                         TABLE A-3.  CURRENT AND FUTURE COAL MINES IN NORTH DAKOTA
                                                                                   (a)
vO
Name and
Location
of Mine
Husky
N 47°56'
W lOl'Ol'
Coteau
N 47°26'
W 101°49'
Falkirk
N 46°49'
W 100°A7'
Gascoyne
N 46°08'
W 103°04'
Beulah
N 47°16'
W 101°46'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface 0.14 in 1975
0.13 in 1976
Surface 7.0-7.5 in 1981
14.0-15.0 in 1985
Surface Under construc-
tion
5.0-6.0 in 1981
Surface 1.9 in 1975
2.5 in 1976
Surface 1.3 in 1976
2.2 in 1981
4.4 in 1985
Coal Analysis
Moist - 35%
Ash - 7%
Sulfur - 1.2%
Btu/lb - 6,500
Moist - 36%
Ash - 7.4%
Moist - 39.5%
Ash - 6.8%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 6,415
Moist - 43%
Ash - 5-8.5%
Sulfur - 0.75%
Btu/lb - 5,900-
6,250
Moist - 34-37%
Ash - 5-8%
Sulfur - 0.5-
0.7%
Btu/lb - 6,700-
6,900
Employinent^^
Planned
Current Future
8(c>
12 360
21 300
73 73
(65 in 1976)
110 280
(58 in 1976)
-------
                                            TABLE A-3.  (Continued)
00
Name and
Location
of Mine Type of Mine
Glen Harold (TT) Surface
N 47*16'
W 101*19'
Center Surface
N 47*05'
W 101*16'
Dunn Center Surface
N 47*23'
W 102*53'
Noon an Surface
N 48*52'
W 102°53'
Velva Surface
N 48*01'
W 101*01'
Indian Head Surface
N 47*14'
W 101°00'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(million tons/yr)
3.8 in 1976
1.9 in 1975
1.5 in 1975
1.7 in 1976
4.4 in 1978
13.0-14.0 in 1982
0.4 in 1975
0.4 in 1976
0.3 in 1975
0.3 in 1976
0.8 in 1975
1.1 in 1976
Coal Analysis
Moist - 37-42%
Aah - 4.0-6.51
Sulfur - 0.3 -
l.OZ
Btu/lb - 6,000-
7,000
Moist - 39%
Ash - 6.2%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 6,650
Moist - 34.0%
Ash - 8.0%
Sulfur - 0.8%
Btu/lb - 6,800


Moist - 34.5%
Ash - 8%
Sulfur - 0.55%
Btu/lb - 7,100
Employment
Planned
Current Future
147 147
(151 in 1976)(c)
38 80
(53 in 1976)
0 300
23(0
28
54
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                            TABLE A-3.   (Continued)
vo
VO
Name and
Location
of Mine
Unnamed (Heart
Type of Mine
Surface
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(million tons/yr)

Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future

              Butte  area)
           N  A6°42'
           W  101°55'
           Unnamed  (south
              of Beach)
           N  46852'
           W  103°58'
Surface
Arrowhead
N 46°21'
W 102"59'
Bains Sub-
Bitumlno
N 45°59' '
W 102 "18 '
Chamberlain
N 46000'
W 102°30'
Knife River
N 46°04'
W 103°02'
Larson B-N
N 48°52'
W 102 °52'
Mineral loca-
tion
Underground
Underground
Surface
Surface
                                                     (continued)
-------
TABLE A-3.  (Continued)
Name and
Location
of Mine
Consolidated Coal
N 47*15'
W 101 '59'
North (KRCC)
N 47*17'
W 101*42'
Smith-Ullman-
Olson
N 46*01'
W 102*30'
Larson
N 48*53'
W 102*54'
Dakota Collier-
ies
N 47*15'
W 101*52'
Dakota Lanonite
N 46*08'
W 103*35'
Cunt her
N 46°09'
W 101°53'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface
Surface
Mineral loca-
tion
Surface
Surface-
under-
ground
Surface
Surface
Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future







         (continued)
-------
                                           TABLE  A-3.   (Continued)
O
h*
                                                 Current  and
               Name and                        Planned  Future
               Location                          Production
               of Mine        Type  of Mine    (million  tons/yr)
            Dakota Star
            N 47°22'
            W 101°38'
           Carbon C.oal
           N 46°50'
           W 101°34'
Knife River
N 46°08'
W 103°02'
            Nygard
            N 47°56'
            W 103°09'
           Grishkousky
           N 47°08'
           W 101°47'
           Fleramer
           N 46°53'
           W 101e18'
           Roy Kern
           N 46°09'
           W 103°15'
                                                       Coal Analysis
                                                        Employment
                                                              Planned
                                                     Current  Future
                   Surface
                                  4.0 after 1985
                                    Moist - 37%
                                    Ash - 6-7%
                                    Sulfur - 0.7%
                                    Btu/lb - 6,800-
                                      6,900
                   Surface
Surface
                   Surface
                   Surface
                   Surface
                   Surface
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                          TABLE A-3.   (Continued)
N>
O
              Name  and
              Location
              of  Mine
                   Type of Mine
   Current and
 Planned Future
   Production
(million tons/yr)
Coal Analysis
   Employment
         Planned
Current  Future
          Cuater  (Truax
            TR)
          N  47°37'
          W
                   Surface
          Glen  Harold
            (CCC)
          N  47°18'
          W
Hanging Cross
N 46*45'
W 101*42'
                   Surface
                             Surface
          Knifer  River
          N  47*14'
          W  101% 7'
                   Surface
         Landaker
         N 48°03'
         W 102'15'
                   Surface
         Art Kobs
         N 47Dllf
         W
                   Mineral loca-
                     tion
         McKinley, Nelson
         N 48°06'
         W 103°32'
                   Underground
                                                   (continued)
-------
                                            TABLE  A-3.   (Continued)
NJ
O
OJ
Name and
Location
of Mine
Freyer
N 47°10'
W 101*35'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface
Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future

           North & South
             BE
           N 47°12'
           W
Center Strip
N 46°59'
W 101*33'
           Sampson Mine
           N 47°14'
           W 102°A2'
           Nokota Co. 01
           South of Max
           McLean County
                   Mineral loca-
                     tion
                              Surface
                   Surface
                   Surface
6.6 after 1982
           Rennera Cove
           Renners Cove
           Mercer Co.
                   Surface
3.0 after 1980
Moist - 37%
Ash - 7%
Sulfur - 0.7%
Btu/lb - 6,700-
  6.800	
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                TABLE A-3.   (Continued)
Name and
Location
of Mine
Washburn
Washburn
McLean Co.
Underwood
N 47'27'
W 101*07'
Garrison
N 47°38'
W 101a26'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface 5.0 after 1985
Surface 1.5 after 1985
Surface 3.30 in 1984
Coal Analysis
Moist - 38%
Ash - 4.4%
Sulfur - 0.5X
Btu/lb - 7,100


Employment
Planned
Current Future



(a)
(b)
(c)
Based on Bureau of Mines Information Circular 8772 (Rich, 1978); Bureau of Mines In-
formation Circular 8719 (Corsentino, 1976); Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nielson,
1977); Mineral Industry Location System (USBM, 1978).

Unless otherwise noted, employment figures are from Bureau of Mines Information Cir-
cular 8772 (Rich, 1978).

From Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nielson, 1977).
-------
                           TABLE A-4.   CURRENT AND FUTURE MINES IN SOUTH DAKOTA
                                                                                 (a)
M
O
I/I
Name and
Location
of Mine
Lignite Pit
N 45°37'
W 103°16'
Lignite Pit
N 45°49'
W 103°15'
Lignite Pit
N A5°30'
W 103°10'
Lignite
N 45°35'
W 102°48'
Phillips
N 45e26'
W 102°49'
Lignite Pit
N 45°52'
W 103°25'
Lignite Pit
N 45°54'
W 103°16'
Current and
Planned Future Employment
Production Planned
Type of Mine (million tons/yr) Coal Analysis Current Future
Surface
Surface
Surface
Underground
Underground
Surface
Surface
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                           TABLE A-4.  (Continued)
N>
o
               Name and
               Location
               of Mine
           Lignite Pit
           N 45°28'
           W 103°09'
           Lignite
           N 45°35'
           W 102*48'
           Seidell
           N 45°35'
           W 102°21'
           Lignite  Pit
           N 45°52'
           W 103°25'
           Lignite  Pit
           N  45°54'
           W  103C17'
          Cooke
          N 45°33'
          W 102°08'
          Lignite
          N 45°40'
          W 102°27'

          Lignite Pit
          N 45°50'
          W 103° 15'
 Type of Mine
   Current and
 Planned Future
   Production
(million tons/yr)
                                                                  Coal Analysis
   Employment
         Planned
Current  Future
 Surface
 Surface
 Surface
Surface
Surface
Surface
Surface &
  Underground
Surface
                                                   (continued)
-------
                                           TABLE A-4.   (Continued)
O
•vl
Name and
Location
of Mine
Lignite Pit
N 45°29'
W 103°09'
Cornelia
N 45°45'
W 102°40'
Lignite
N 102°39'
W 45°49'
Lignite Pit
N A5°51'
W 103°16'
Lignite Pit
N A5°35'
W 103°07'
Jones
N 45"34'
W 102°51'
Lignite Pit
N 45°41'
W 102845'
Current and
Planned Future Employment
Production Planned
Type of Mine (million tons/yr) Coal Analysis Current Future
Surface
Surface &
Underground
Surface &
Underground
Surface
Surface
Underground
Surface
           (a)
              Based on Bureau of Mines Information Circular 8772 (Rich, 1978); Bureau of Mines In-
              formation Circular 8719 (Corsentino, 1976); Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nlelson,
              1977); Mineral Industry Location System (USMB, 1978).
-------
                 TABLE A-5.  CURRENT AND FUTURE MINES IN
Name and
Location
of Mine Type of Mines
Soldier Canyon Underground
N 39*41'
W 110°37'
Braztah Underground
«,4,5,6
N 39°A3'
W 111°55'
Deer Creek Underground
N 39°22'
W m°06'
Wilberg Underground
N 39°19'
W 111008'
Straight Canyon Underground
(Near Castle Dale,
Emery Co.)
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(million tons/yr)
O.S In 1976
1.0 in 1978
03 & 5 - 0.3 in
1975
4>3 & 5 - 0.9 in
1976
6.5 in 1980 (all)
1.0 in 1976
2.2 in 1978
0.2 in 1976
2.2 in 1980
2.5 in 1980
Coal Analysis
Moist - A. 5%
Ash - 8. 4%
Sulfur - 0.5%
Btu/lb - 12..500
Moist -5.7%
Ash - 9.7%
Sulfur - 0.5Z
Btu/lb - 12,300
Moist - 3.5%
Ash - 5.6%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 13,300
Moist - 5.4%
Ash - 9.2X
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 12,500

EmployTnent(b)
Planned
Current Future
160 345
2,250
860
760
860
Perron Canyon
(Near Perron,
  Emery Co.)
Underground    1.0 in 1980
345
                                         (continued)
-------
                                            TABLE A-5.  (Continued)
o
<£>
Name and
Location
of Mine
Emery
(near Emery,
Emery Co.)
Emery Strip
(near Emery,
Emery Co.)
John Henry
N 37°10'
W 111°32'
Unnamed
(near Alton,
Kane Co.)
Escalante
(Near Escalante,
Carfield Co.)
Unnamed
(Carbon Co.)
Unnamed
Factory Butte
(Wayne Co.)

Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr) Coal Analysis
Underground 0.04 in 1.975
0.08 in 1976
1.4 in 1980
Surface 0.5 eventually
Underground 0.4 eventually Moist - 5-8%
(Delayed) Ash - 4-8%
Sulfur -
0.43-0.8%
Btu/lb - 11,700-
12,500
Surface 11.5 in 1982 Sulfur - 1.1%
Btu/lb - 10,200
Underground 6.0 in 1985
Dependent on
water avail.
Underground 0.5 in 1980
Planning stages
Surface 1.0 in 1980
Start-up 1976
(continued)
Employment
Planned
Current Future
82(c) 483 .
33
183
760
2,070
170
345

-------
                                            TABLE A-5.   (Continued)
ro
*-*
O
Current and
Name and Planned Future Employment
Location Production Plannec
of Mine Type of Mines (million tona/yr) Coal Analysis Current Future
Unnamed Underground 1.0 in 1980
(Sevler Co.) Planning stages
Intermountaln Underground 10.0 In 1985
Power Project
(Wayne Co.)
Utah 92 Underground 0.2 In 1975
N 39"43' 0.3 in 1976
W 111°10' 0.7 in 1978
Dellna tl Underground 1.3 in 1978
(Near Clear
Creek, Car-
bon Co.)
Dellna t 2 Underground 0.8 in 1979
(Near Clear
Creek, Car-
bon Co.)
O'Connor #1 Underground 0.2 in 1980
(Near Clear
Creek, Car- •
bon Co . )
Unnamed Underground Unknown Sulfur - 0.5%
(Near Sunnyside, Btu/lb - 12,000
Carbon Co.)
345
340
240
415
275
70
790
                                                      (continued)
-------
                                TABLE  A-5.   (Continued)
Name and
Location
of Mine
Star Point 03
(Near Wattis
Carbon Co.)
Southern Utah
Fuels 01
N 38*55'
W 111025'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mines (million tons/yr)
Underground 1.0 in 1981
Underground 1.0 in 1977
1.5 in 1978
Employment
Coal Analysis Current

Moist - 9% 185 (
Ash - 9%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 11,200
Planned
Future
345
°) 520
Gordon Creek tf3
(Near Helper,
  Carbon Co.)


Swisher 05
(Near Huntington,
  Emery Co.)
Underground    0.2 in 1977
Underground    0.2 in 1979
Moist - 6.3%
Ash - 6.22
Sulfur - 0.5%
Btu/lb - 12.500
Moist - 6.5%
Ash - 4.9%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 12.700
70
70
Huntington
Canyon #4 .
(Emery Co.)

Thompson
(Thompson,
Grand Co.)
Underground 0.2 eventually



Underground 0.6 in 1979


Moist - 4.8%
Ash - 5.3%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 13.200



10 (c) 70



70


                                          (continued)
-------
                                            TABLE A-5.  (Continued)
to
Nane and
Location
of Mine
Rilda Canyon
(lluntingtqn,
Emery Co.)
Beehive
N 39*19'
W 111*05'
Deseret
N 39*19'
W 111*05'
Sunnyside fl
N 39*33'
W 110*22'
Sunnyside 12
N 39*33'
W 110*22'
Sunnyside 03
N 39*33'
W 110*22'
Central Prep
Plant
(Sunnyside ,
Carbon Co.)
Type of Mine
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Prep Plant
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(million tons/yr) Coal Analysis
0.2 eventually
0.56 in 1975
0.68 in 1976
0.5 in 1976
0.82 in 1975
0.65 in 1976
Temporarily
Inactive
0.2 in 1975
0.1 in 1976
0.06 in 1975 Moist - 52
0.81 in 1976 Ash - 6%
Sulfur - 0.9Z
Btu/lb - 13.500
Employment
Planned
Current Future
70
70 (0
65(C>
280 

55 (c)
20(c>
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                            TABLE A-5.   (Continued)
ro
Name and
Location
of Mine
Starpoint * 1 & 2
N 39°31'
w ni-oi1
Gordon Creek
02 & 3
N 39°41'
W 111*04'
Cordon Creek 06
Huntington
Canyon
N 39°22'
W 111°07'
King
N 39°30'
W 111°04'
Wellington •
(Carbon Co.)
Geneva (East
Carbon,
Emery Co.)
Type of Mines
Surface &
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Surface &
Underground
Prep Plant
Underground
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(million tons/yr)
0.45 in 1975
0.55 in 1976
0.4 In 1976
Under Develop-
ment
Opened March,
1977
0.5 in 1975
0.6 in 1976
0.7 in 1975
0.67 in 1975
0.60 in 1976
Coal Analysis
Moist - 9%
Ash - 8.50%
Sulfur - 0.65%
Btu/lb - 11,500
Moist - 9%
Ash - 10%
Sulfur - 0.5Z
Btu/lb - 11,500




Moist - 7X
Ash - 12%
Sulfur - 0.86%
Btu/lb - 13,500
Employment
Planned
Current Future
165 
78
3(c)
10(0

44
286
                                                     (continued)
-------
              TABLE  A-5.   (Continued)
Name and
Location
of Mine
Leamaster
N 39*25'
W 111*08'
Shakespeare
N 37*39'
W 111*58'
Western Mines -
Gene
N 39*27'
W 110*20'
Emery Pit
N 38*51'
W 110*15'
Co-Op
N 39°24'
W 111*07'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr) Coal Analysis
Underground
Underground
Underground
Surface
Underground
Employment
Planned
Current Future





Trail Mountain
N 39*18'
W 111*11'
Underground
Cordon Creek
N 39*41'
W 111*04'
Surface
                       (continued)
-------
                                            TABLE A-5.   (Continued)
t-o
Name and
Location
of Mine
Sun Valley
N 38°46'
W lll'lS'
Carbon Fuel 03
N 39°43'
W 110e53'
Larson-Rlgby
N 39°34'
W 111°12'
Thompson
N 37°34'
W 113°03'
King 05
N 39°31'
W Ille05'
Black Ace
Thompson, Grand
Co.
Ivle Creek
Erne ry •
Emery Co.
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
t
Underground
Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future







                                                  (continued)
-------
                                            TABLE A-5.   (Continued)
ro
Current and
Name and Planned Future
Location Production
of Mine Type of Mine (million tons/yr) Coal Analysis
Employment
Planned
Current Future
Colomblne 11 Underground
Scofield,
Carbon Co.
Black Hawk Underground
Coalville,
Summit Co.
Knight Underground 0.5 in 1978
Salina, Sevier
Co.
Unnamed, South Underground 1.6 in 1981
of Hiawatha,
Emery Co.
MacKinnon 12-3, Underground
West of Hiawatha,
Carbon & Emery
Cos.
           (a)
           (b)
           (c)
Based on Bureau of Mines Information Circular 8772 (Rich, 1978); Bureau of Mines In-
formation Circular 8719 (Corsentino, 1976); Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nielson,
1977); Mineral Industry Location System (USBM, 1978).

Unless otherwise noted, employment figures are from Bureau of Mines Information Cir-
cular 8772 (Rich, 1978).

From Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nielson, 1977).
-------
TABLE A-6.  CURRENT AND FUTURE COAL MINES  IN WYOMING
                                                     (a)
Name and
Location
of Mine
Stansbury 01
N 41° 41'
W 109 °11'
Rainbow 18
N 41°31'
W 109"13'
Jim Bridger
N 41°46'
W 108°45'
Big Horn 01
N 44°53'
W 106°58'
Elkol
N 41°42'
W 110°34'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Underground Opening planned
for 1976
1.4 in 1980
Underground 0.1 in 1976
0.2 in 1980
Surface 3.4 in 1976
7.5 in 1980
Surface 0.8 in 1976
1.5 in 1980
Surface 1.0 in 1975
1.8 in 1976
1.1 in 1980
Coal Analysis
Moist - 17.5%
Ash - 4.7%
Sulfur - 1.1%
Btu/lb - 10,500
Moist - 11.4%
Ash - 4.2%
Sulfur - 0.9%
Btu/lb - 11,700
Moist - 20.5%
Ash - 9.7%
Sulfur - 0.5%
Btu/lb - 9,300
Moist - 24.5%
Ash - 5.8%
Sulfur - 0.7%
Btu/lb - 9,300
Moist - 20.4%
Ash - 3.0%
Sulfur - 0.7%
Btu/lb - 10,200
Employment
Planned
Current Future
30 275
70 70
(83 in 1976)
120 200
(165 in 1976)(c)
69 69
35 80
(150 in 1976) (c)
                          (continued)
-------
                                             TABLE A-6.  (Continued)
ro
H"
oo
Name and
Location
of Mine
Grass Creek
N 43*55'
U 108841 '
Dave Johnston
N 43002'
W lOS'SO1
Vanguard 02 & 3
N 41°53§
W 106°39'
Medicine Bow
N 41°55'
W 106'46'
Rosebud
N 41e54'
W 106'30'
Seminoe 92
N 41*54'
W 106°30'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface
0.7 in 1980
Surface 2.7 in 1976
Underground 1.0 in 1975
1.1 in 1976
«2 (1.0-2.0 in
1980)
#3 (0.5 in 1978)
Surface 2.8 in 1976
3.6 in 1980
Surface 1.8 in 1975
2.2 in 1976
Surface 2.9 in 1975
2.7 in 1976
Coal Analysis
Moist - 12.1%
Ash - 9.0%
Sulfur - 0.4%
Btu/lb - 10,800
Moist - 26.3%
Ash - 12.0%
Sulfur - 0.5Z
Btu/lb - 7,500
Moist - 13.0%
Ash - 11.5%
Sulfur - 0.4%
Btu/lb - 9,800
Moist - 12.0%
Ash - 7.5%
Sulfur - 0.5%
Btu/lb - 10,200
Moist - 14.2%
Ash - 8.2%
Sulfur - 1.0%
Btu/lb - 10,300

Employment
Planned
Current Future
100
13l(c>
120 120
(150 in 1976)(c)
135 135
(125 in 1976)
115
121
-------
                                            TABLE A-6.   (Continued)
N>
,_

10
Name and
Location
of Mine
Seminoe 01
N 41°53'
W 106°48'
Wyodak
N 44°17'
W 105°21'
Bell Ayr South
N 44°05'
W 105°22'
Sorenson
N 41°42'
W 110°34'
Rawhide
N 44°29'
W 105*25'
Rochelle
N 43°36'
W 105°14'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface 2.4 in 1975
2.6 in 1976
Surface 0.8 in 1975
2.2 in 1980
Surface 3.3 in 1975
7.3 in 1976
10-15 in 1980
Surface 1.7 in 1975
2.3 in 1976
3.0-4.7 in 1980
Surface 8.5 in 1980
Surface 5.0-11.0 in 1985
Coal Analysis

Moist - 29.2%
Ash - 9.6%
Sulfur - 0.8%
Btu/lb - 8,200
Moist - 26.2%
Ash - 5.3%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 8,800
Moist - 20.9%
Ash - 4.8%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 9,500
Moist - 31.0%
Ash - 6.0%
Sulfur - 0.4%
Btu/lb - 8,100
Moist - 28.0%
Ash - 5.6%
Sulfur - 0.3%
Btu/lb - 8,400
Employment
Planned
Current Future
166(c>
28 190
250 350
300 350
48(c) 560
225
                                                      (continued)
-------
                                             TABLE A-6.   (Continued)
ro
Is)
o
Name and
Location
of Mine
FMC Mine,
Skull Point
N 41*42'
W 110°38'
Eagle Butte
N 44*26'
W 105°25'
Cordero
N 44*03'
W 105*21'
Jacobs Ranch
N 43*42'
W 105°41'
East Gillette
N 44*19'
W 105*28'
Black Butte
N 41*36'
W 108*41'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface 1.0-2.0 in 1980
Surface 30>0 in 1980
Surface Under construction
12.0 in 1986
Surface Under construction
14.0 in 1983
Surface Planned open 1977
5.0-11.0 in 1980
N
Surface 4.2 in 1980
Planned open 1977
Coal Analysis
Moist - 20.9%
Ash - 4.8%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 9,500
Moist - 29.2%
Ash - 9.6Z
Sulfur - 0.8%
Btu/lb - 8,200

Moist - 29.0%
Ash - 5.8%
Sulfur - 0.5%
Btu/lb - 8,500
Moist - 31.5%
Ash - 5.7%
Sulfur - 0.46%
Btu/lb - 8,000
Moist - 17.7%
Ash - 8.5%
Sulfur - 0.4%
Btu/lb - 9,700
Employment
Planned
Current Future
60 100
0 350
400
62(c) 300
300
35 200
                                                      (continued)
-------
                                           TABLE  A-6.   (Continued)
NJ
NJ
Name and
Location
of Mine
Thunderbird
Campbell Co.
PSO Mine
N 45°00'
W 107°00' ,
Buckskin Mine
Campbell Co.
Carbon County
Coal
N 41°53'
W 106*27'
Twin Creek
N 41°47'
W 110°34'
Caballo
N 44°08'
W 105°18'
Red Rim
N 41°42'
W 107°31'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface 3.0 in 1980
Tentative
Surface Start in 1976
0.5 in 1978
Surface 4.0 in 1980
Very tentative
Underground 0.8 in 1976
2.5 in 1980
Surface Planning stages
3.0 in 1980
Surface Planning stages
12.0 in 1980
Surface 2.5 in 1980
Coal Analysis •
Moist - 27.7%
Ash - 13.4%
Sulfur - 0.6%
Btu/lb - 7,600

Btu/lb - 8,200
Moist - 11.5%
Ash - 6.6%
Sulfur - 0.9%
Btu/lb - 10,800



Employment
Planned
Current Future
225
50
250
90
200
150

                                                      (continued)
-------
                                           TABLE A-6.   (Continued)
ro
to
Name and
Location
of Mine
China Butte
N 41*31'
W 107*38'
Coal Creek
Campbell County
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr) Coal Analysis
Surface 1.0-3.0 in 1980
4.0 in 1982
Surface Under development
Employment
Planned
Current Future


           Rimrock 41,  2 &  5  Surface

           N 41°53'

           W 106e38'
Long Canyon Underground
N 41°47f
W 109°10'
Black Thunder Surface 7.0-10.0 In
N 43°40' X9&0
W 105e15' 20.0 in 1982
South Haystack Surface 2.5-3 0 in 1°78
N 41°23'
W 110*34 '
Atlantic Rim Surface 2 0 in 1983
N 41°31'
W 107*27'
Moist - 2ft. 1% 61
-------
                                              TABLE A-6.  (Continued)
NJ
Name and
Location
of Mine
Cherokee
N 41°42'
W 107°45'
Pronghorn
N 44°03*
W 105°21'
Cravat
N' 43°00*
W 110°40'
Stevens North
N 4 3° 08'
W 105Q45'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface 6.0 in 1984
Surface 5.0 in 1981
Surface Unknown
Surface 5.0 in 1985

Coal Analysis
Moisture - 21.92%
Ash - 14.56%
Sulfur - 1.75%
Btu/lb - 8,000
Moisture - 26.96%
Ash - 5.3%
Sulfur - 0.42%
Btu/lb - 8,590


Employment^)
Planned
Future




                                                     (continued)
-------
                                TABLE A-6.   (Continued)
Name and
Location
of Mine
North Gillette
N 44*26'
W 105*26'
Current and
Planned Future
Production
Type of Mine (million tons/yr)
Surface
Employment
Planned
Coal Analysis Current Future

(a)
   Based on Bureau of Mines Information Circular 8772 (Rich,  1978);  Bureau of Mines In-
   formation Circular 8719 (Corsentino,  1976);  Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nielaon,
   1977);  Mineral Industry Location System (USBM,  1978).

* 'Unless otherwise noted, employment figures are  from Bureau of Mines Information Cir-
   cular 8772 (Rich, 1978).

   From Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nielson, 1977).
-------
                         TABLE B-l.   COAL MINES UNDER DEVELOPMENT OR EXPANSION IN COLORADO
                                                                                          (*)
to
K>
Ul

Man* and
Location
of Mlna
Watklna* Llfnlta
M M'47'
U 104 '3V
Adana County
Convaraa
M Jl'14'
U 10»*17*
Dalta County
Farnar*a Hlna
II !»•»»•
U IOJ'46*
balta County
Mn| Hlna (a nl .
t. ol raonla)
Dalta County

Old llua Ribbon
M 38'JI'
U 107*12'
Oalta County
Orchard Vallay
N M'12'
U 107*)9'
Oalta County
Station Ctaafc
M }*'ia*
U 104*11'
llbart County
Currant and
Plannad Putura
Production
(nil lion toni/yr)|
Typa of Mlna Hap Color lndlciler<>>
Surlaca 12.) In 1*11
lad


Uodarsroucul 1.1 in 1»»0
Potanttal
llua

Underground 0.1 In 1»«0
1.0 In 1*11
llua

Undaitround 0.} in 1»«0
llua


Undaiground 0.1 In l*7a
0.01 In 1*77
0.05 In 1*10
llua
Utidartround O.J In 1*76
O.i-0.7 In 1*7«
i.o in i»ao
llua
Surfaca • 1.0 In 1*112
llua



E*p)oy
Coal Analyala Currant
Molat - 101 0
Aah - 101
Sulfur - 0.1-0.4S
Itu/lb - 4.000
Sulfur - 0.4-0.61 10
Itu/lb - 12.000


Molat - »-7J
Aah - 1.1-J.4X
Sulfur - 0.4-0. it
Itu/lb - 11.500
Molat - 2.»-a.lI 6
Aah - 4.1-I.U
Sulfur - 0.4-1. 21
Itu/lb - 12, (00
Molat - ».0-t.n 10
Aah - 3.2-1.41
Sulfur - 0.4-0. tX
Itu/lb - 12.700-11.100
Molat - 10-111 140 HI
Aah - 3-41
Sulfur - 0.4-0.441
Itu/lb - 12.000
Llinlta 0




MM
PUnnad
Futura
.60



a)



141



171



10







44



                                                                                                                                      ca
                                                         (continued)
-------
TABLE B-l.  (Continued)
H*me and
Location
of Mine
Ht. Cunnison
V 38*52*
U 107*26'
Cunnlson County
Unnamed (1 •!. I.
of Somerset)
Cunnison County
Grizzly Creek
H 40*32'
U 106*21*
Jackson County
Merr Strip 11
M 40*44*
W 106*09*
Jackvon County
Hay Gulch
H 37*17*
U 108*03*
La Plata County
Lorcnclto
H 37*08*
U 104*49'
La« Anlaas County
Maxwell
V 37*10*
W 104*52*
La a Anlaas County
Current and
Planned future
Production
(•illion tons/yr):
Type of Mine Hap Color Indicator"1)
• Underground 0.5 In 1981
2.5 in 1985
Green
Underground 2.0 In 1960
Creen
Surface 0.5 In 1979
2.0 in 1980
Creen
Surface 0.2 In 1975
0.3 In 1980
Blue
Surface 0.025 In 1978
0.05 in 1980
Blue
Underground 0.5 in 1981
1.0 in 1982
Blue
Underground 0.10 in 1978
0.25 in 1979
0.60 in 1980
Blue
Employment *>c)
Coal Analysis Current
Moist - 10.41
Ash - 4.5Z
Sulfur - 0.47;
Btu/lb - 11.846
10
Moist - 20Z
Ash - 10Z
Sulfur - 0.6-0.7Z
Btu/lb - 9,000
Hoist - 11. 0-14. 41 36
Ash - 2.1-10.81
Sulfur - 0.2-0.7Z
Btu/lb - 10.040-13,290
Moist - 5-6X
Ash - 7-101
Sulfur - 0.6-1.6Z
Btu/lb - 11,800-14,000
Moist -61 0
Ash - 91
Sulfur - 0.6Z
Btu/lb - 13,700
Coking Coal
Planned
Future

600
40


500
100
          (continued)
-------
                                           TABLE B-l.   (Continued)
to
Name and
Location
of Mine
Cameo
N 39*21'
V 108*05'
Mesa County
Colowyo
N 40*13'
M 107*50'
Maffat County
Unnamed (20 ml.
s. of Craig) •
Moffat County
Vise Hill 15
N 40*26'
W 107*39'
Moffat County
Cordon
N 40*11'
W 108*43'
Klo Blanco County
Apex 12
N 40*18'
M 107*02'
Koutt County
Dauson Unit
M 40*29'
W 107*14'
Routt County
Type of Mine
Underground
Surface
Surface
Underground &
Surface
2 Underground
1 Surface
Underground
Underground
Current and
Planned Futur*
Production
(million tons/yr):
Map Color Indicator l^)
1977 prep.
0.5 in 1979
0.9 in 1980+
Blue
0.25 in 1977
3.0 in 1980
Green
1.0 in 1980
(Total with Unnamed.
Moffat County)
Blue
0.5 in 1975
0.4 in 1977
0.6 in 1980
Blue
1.5 in 1980
2.3 in 1985
3.7 in 1990
Green
0.10 in 1977
0.25 in 1980
Blue
0.1 in 1977 or 1978
2.0-4.0 nmxlmun
Green
Coal Analysis
Moist - 6-8Z
Ash - 7-11Z
Sulfur - 0.4-0. 6Z
Btu/lb - 12,500
Moist - 8.5-23.3Z
Ash - 2.7-9.4Z
Sulfur - 0.2-l.OZ
Btu/lb - 10,500

Moist - 16. OZ
Ash - 5.8Z
Sulfur - 0.5Z
Btu/lb - 10,600
Moist - 13Z
Ash - 9Z
Sulfur - 0.4Z
Btu/lb - 11,100
Moist - 6-9. 2Z
Ash - 3-12. IX
Sulfur - 0.5-0.7Z
Btu/lb - 12,400
Moist - 7Z
Ash - 81
Sulfur - 0.5Z
Btu/lb - 11,500
Employment (°)
Planned
Current Future

244
75
72 150
(90 in 1976) W
0 700


                                                     (continued)
-------
                                                       TABLE B-l.   (Continued)
HUM and
Location
of Kin*
Edna
N 40*20'
U 107*01'
Routt County
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(•llllon toni/yr):
Typa of Mine Map Color Indicator*"'
Surfaca 0.8 In 1975
1.1 In 1976
1.0 In 1979
0.8S In I960
Coal Analyiia
MoUt - 7.7-12.52
Aah - J.3-13.2X
Sulfur - 0.6-1. 2X
Btu/lb - 10.400-12,000
Employment 
Planned
Current Future
75 ,l\
(77 In 1976) 
                    Unnamed (14 •!.
                      E. of Steamboat
                      Springe)
                    Routt County
                   Surface         1.0 In 1980
                                  (Total with Unnamed.
                                   Moffat County)
                                  Blue
                                                                                                                          75
tsJ
S>
oo
                     (a)
                     (b)
                     (c)
                     (d)
Based on Bureau of Hlnea Information  Circular 8772 (Rich, 1978); Bureau of Mines Information
Circular 8719 (Coreentlno,  1976);  Keystone Coal  Induetry Manual (Nlelaon, 1977); and Mineral
Industry Location Systems (USBM,  1978).

In order to be Indicated on the map,  a nine had  toi  (1) have development planned for 1980
or later and (2) be located with  latitude-longitude or by come other detailed description.
Ttie total increase In tonnage was  calculated as  the maximum projected value minus the cur-
rent value with blue • 0-1.00, green  - 2.0-5.99, and red - 6.0 or greater (Theae wore con-
verted to symbols In this report,  Figure  3).

Unleaa othervlee noted, employment figures are from Bureau of Hlnes Information Circular
B772 (Rich, 1978).

From Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nlelaon, 1977).
-------
                     TABLE B-2.  COAL MINES UNDER DEVELOPMENT  OR  EXPANSION IN  MONTANA(a)
NJ
ttane and
Location
of Mine
East Decker
N 45*05'
U 106*53*
Big Horn County
Sarpy Creek.
N 45*49'
W 107*04'
Big Horn County
Spring Creek
N 45*08'
U 106*53'
Big Horn County
Voung's Creek,
Tanner Creek,
Squirrel Creek
Unnamed
N 45*03'
W 107*00'
Big Horn County
Circle West
N 47*23'
W 105*34*
McCone County
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(nllllon tons/yr);
Type of Mine Map Color Indicator *°)
Surface 10.2 In
20.0 in
Red
Surface 6.5 in
15.0 In
Red
Surface 10.0 in
Red
Surface 6.0 In
16.0 In
Red
Surface 5.0 In
Creen
1976(7)
1981
1980
1982
1980
1980
1985
1983
Coal Analysis
Moist - 24. IX
Ash - 4.3Z
Sulfur - 0.6Z
Btu/lb - 9.700
Moist - 23Z
Ash - 111
Sulfur - 0.7Z
Btu/lb - 8,500

Moist - 24Z
Ash -3.51
Sulfur - 0.25Z
Btu/lb - 9.400
Moist - 34.91
Ash - 6.9Z
Sulfur - 0.5Z
Btu/lb - 6,930
Employment (c)
Planned
Current Future
128^d) 435
990

435
0 200
                                                    (continued)
-------
                                                        TA11LE B-2.    (Continued)
Current and



Na»

a and


Planned
Future



Production
Location

of
Mine
Roaabud
N
H
45*50'
106*3i
Roaebud

i
County
(i
Type of Mine Map
Surface 9.
19.
Red

2
1


•lllion
toaa/yr); .
Color Indicator**'
In 1976
In 1980








Coal
Holat
Aah -
Sulfur
Btu/lb
- 24
8. 92
- 0
- 8

Analyaia
.61

.n
.703


Employment (')

Currant
275«>



Plannad
Future
1.260



N)
U)
O
                    (b)
                    (c)
                    (d)
'Baaed on Bureau of Minea  Information Circular 8772 (Rich, 1978); Bureau of Mlnaa Information
 Circular 8719 (Coraentlno,  1976);  Keystone Coal  Induatry Manual (Nlelson, 1977); and Mineral
 Industry Location Syatema (USBM.  1978).

 In order to be Indicated  on the map, a mine had  to:   (1) have development planned for 1980
 or later and (2) be located with  latitude-longitude or by some other detailed description.
 The total increaae In tonnage waa  calculated aa  the maximum projected value mlnua the cur-
 rent value with blue • 0-1.00, gruen • 2.0-5.99, and  red - 6.0 or greater (Theae were con-
 verted to aynbola in thla report,  Figure  3).

 Unleaa otherwise noted, employment figurea are from Bureau of Nines Information Circular
 8772 (Rich. 1978).

 From Keystone Coal Induatry Manual (Nlelson, 1977).
-------
                   TABLE  B-3.   COAL MINES UNDER DEVELOPMENT OR EXPANSION IN NORTH DAKOTA^3)
M
Naae and
Location
of Mine Type of Mine
Falklrk Surface
N 46*49'
W 100*47*
Burlelgh County
Dunn Center Surface
N 47*23'
W 102*51'
Dunn County
Garrison Surface
N 47*36'
W 101*26'
McLean County
Nokota Co. fl Surface
(South of Max)
McLean County
Underwood Surface
N 47*27'
W 101*07'
McLean County
Waehburn Surface
Washburn
McLean County
Beulah Surface
N 47*16*
U 101*46'
Mercer County
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(million tons/yr):
Map Color Indicator (b)
Under construction
5.0-6.0 In 1981
Green
13.0-14.0 In 1982
Red
3.30 In 1984
Green
6.6 after 1982
Red
1.5 after 1985
Blue
5.0 after 1985
Green
1.3 In 1976
2.2 In 1981
4.4 In 1985
Green
Coal Analysis
Holat - 39.51
Ash - 6.81
Sulfur - 0.61
Btu/lb - 6,415
Moist - 34. OZ
Ash - 8.0Z
Sulfur - 0.8X
Btu/lb - 6,800



Moist - 3BZ
Aah - 4.4Z
Sulfur - O.SZ
Btu/lb - 7.100
Moist - 34-37Z
Ash - 5-8Z
Sulfur - 0.5-0.7Z
Btu/lb - 6,700-6,900
Employment ^c)
Planned
Current Future
21 300
0 300




110 280
(58 In 1976) W
                                                    (continued)
-------
                                     TABLE B-3.   (Continued)
     N«M and
     Location
     of  Mine
                                       Current and
                                      Planned Future
                                        Production
                                    (•11 lion toa«/yr)|
                  Type of Mine    M«p Color Indicator^)
  Coal Analys.lt
                       Current
Planned
Future
Coteeu
N 47*26'
W 101*49'
Mercer County
                 Surface       7.0-7.5 In 1981
                              14.0-15.0 In 1985
                              Red
Dakota Star
M 47*22'
V 101*18*
Mercer County
                 Surface
                               4.0 after 1985
                              Green
Rannert Cove
Rennera Cove
Mercer County
                 Surface
                               3.0 after 1980
                              Creen
Moist - 36X
Aah - 7.4X
                          12
                                   360
Moist - 37*
Ash - 6-7X
Sulfur - 0.7Z
Btu/lb - 6,800-6.900
Molat - 37Z
Aah - 71
Sulfur - 0.7X
Btu/lb - 6.700-6,800
(e)
(b)
Based on Bureau of MInea Intonation Circular  8772  (Rich.  1978); Bureau of Mines Information
Circular 8719 (Coraentlno, 1976);  Keystone  Coal  Industry Manual  (Ntelaon, 1977); and Mineral
Industry Location Systems (USBM,  1978).

In order to be indicated on the map, a nine had  to:   (1) have development planned for 1980
or leter and (2) be located with  latitude-longitude or by  soste other detailed description.
Ttie total Increase in tonnage was  calculated as  the maximum projected value minus the cur-
rent value with blue • 0-1.00, green • 2.0-S.99,  and  red - 6.0 or greater (These were con-
verted to symbols In this report,  Figure 1).

Unless otherwise noted, employment figures  are from Bureau of Mlnea Information Circular
8772 (Mich, 1978).
  'From Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nlelson.  1977).
-------
                      TABLE B-4. COAL MINES  UNDER DEVELOPMENT OR EXPANSION  IN UTAll(a>
ro
u>
u>
Have and
Location
of Hlno
traitah. 13. 4,
i and 6
N 39'43'
U HO'55*
Carbon County
O'Connor 11
(Near Cl«»r
Creek)
Carbon County
Unnamed
Carbon County
Star Point 43
(N«ar Uattls)
Carbon County
Eaery (near Eatery)
Encry County
Perron Canyon
(Hoar Ferron)
Eawry County
Straight Canyon
(Hoar Castle
Dale)
Enery County
Unnannd. South of
Hiawatha
EJxery County
UUberg
N M'191
U 111*06'
EJMry County
Type of Hln«a
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Underground
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(Billion (oni/jrr):
Hap Color ln
-------
                      TABLE  B-4.    (Continued)
N«M tnt
Ural Inn
of HIM
tscilinti (N««r
IiciUntt)
CarfUld County
IfcincMd (H««i
Alton)
K*a« County
UniuMd
Savltr County
IntirMuntiJn
Fowl frojcct
Utyiu County
Uuuxd (factory
lull*)
U*yn« County
Cuff tut MM|
runMd r*tur«
Froductloo
(•11 1 Ian toni/yr)|
Tyf* ol Him* rUr Color J»dlc.tor'k>
Un4oi|tound t.O la 1(1}
D*p*rut»t on w*l«r
•v«llobl«
••<)
Sufdc* 11.) lo >»»:
Rod
Underground 1.0 In 1910
fl*antn| ot«|
1-Unn.d
Coal Anilyili Current Fulurt
2.070
SuUuf - l.lt 760
Itu/lb • 10.100
3* 5
140
US
(c)
'Baaed on Bureau of Mlnea  Information Circular 8772 (Rich, 1978); Bureau of Hlnea Information
 Circular 8719 (Corsentlno,  1976); Keystone Coal Industry Manual (Nlelson, 1977); and Mineral
 Industry Location Systems (USBH, 1978).

'in order to be indicated  on the map, a mine had tot  (1) have development planned for 1980
 or later and (2) be  located with latitude-longitude or by some other detailed description.
 The total increase  in tonnage was calculated aa the maximum projected value minus the cur-
 rent value with blue • 0-1.00, green • 2.0-5.99, and red • 6.0 or greater (These vere con-
 verted to symbols in this report. Figure 3).

 Unless otherwise noted, employment  figures are from Bureau of Mines Information Circular
 8772 (Mich, 1978).

 From Keystone Coal  Industry Manual  (Nlelaon, 1977).
-------
TABLE B-5.  COAL MINES UNDER DEVELOPMENT OR EXPANSION IN WYOMING(a)
Naae and
Local ion
of Mine
Red Rl»
N 41*42*
VJ 105*31'
Albany County
Bell Ayr South
N 44*05'
U 105*22'
Campbell County
Black Thunder
N 43*40'
W 105*15'
Campbell County
Buckskin Mine
Campbell County
Cabal lo
N 44*08'
W 105*18'
Campbell County
Cordero
N 44*01'
W 105*21'
Campbell County
Eagle Butte
N 44*26'
W 105*25'
Campbell County
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(million tons/yr):
Type of Mine Hap Color Indicator (b)
Surface 2.5 In 1980
Green
Surface 3.3 In 1975
7.3 In 1976
10-15 In 1980
Green
Surface 7.0-10.0 In 1980
20.0 In 1982
Red
Surface 4.0 In 1980
Very tentative
(None)
Surface Planning stages
12.0 In 1980
Red
Surface Under construction
12.0 In 1986
Red
Surface 30.0 In 1980
Red
Coal Analysis

Hoist -
Ash - 5.
Sulfur -
Btu/lb -
Hoist -
Ash - 4.
Sulfur -
Btu/lb -
Btu/lb -


Hoist -
Ash - 9.
Sulfur -
Btu/lb -

26. 21
3Z
0.6Z
8.800
28. U
8Z
0.3t
8,600
8,200


29. 2Z
6Z
0.8Z
8,200
Employment 'c)
Planned
Current Future

250 350
61 250
250
150
400
0 350
                               (continued)
-------
                                           TABLE B-5.   (Continued)
CO
o>
Na*e and
Location
of Mine
East Gillette
N 44*19'
W 105*28*
Ca>pbell County
Jacobs Ranch
N 43*42'
W 104*41*
Caapbell County
Prongliorn
N 44*03'
W IOS'21*
Campbell County
Rawhide
N 44*29'
W 10S*25*
Campbell County
Roche lie
N 43*36'
W 105*14'
Cavpbell County
Thundcrblrd
Campbell County
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(alllloD tons/yr):
Type of Hlne Map Color Indicator *b>
Surface Planned open 1977
5.0-11.0 In 1980
Red
Surface Under conat ruction
14.0 In 1983
Red
Surface 5.0 In 1981
Green
Surface 8.5 In 1980
Red
Surface 5.0-11.0 In 1985
Red
Surface 3.0 In 1980
Tentative
(None)
Coal Analyst*
Molet - 31. 5t
Ash - 5.7X
Sulfur - 0.46Z
Btu/lb - 8,000
Most - 29.02
Ach - 5.8Z
Sulfur - 0.51
Btu/lb - 8,500
Hoist - 26.9%
Ash - 5.3X
Sulfur - 0.42Z
Btu/lb - 8,590
Moist - 31. OX
Ash - 6.0Z
Sulfur - 0.4Z
Btu/lb - 8,100
Hoist - 28. OZ
Ash - 5.6Z
Sulfur - 0.3Z
Btu/lb - 8,400
Hoist - 27.71
Ash - 13.41
Sulfur - 0.6Z
Btu/lb - 7,600
Euploy»ent(c)
Planned
Current Future
300
62 300

48 560
225
225
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                           TABLE  B-5.   (Continued)
NJ
U)
HaM and
lo» Crack
« 43*5$'
W 108*41'
Hoc Sprla|* Couocy
Current anil
Manned Future
Production
(million toni/yr>:
Type of Hln* Map Color Indicator1*'
Surfaca 0.8 In 197)
2.2 in 1980
Surface 2.0 In 1*81
Craao
Oodartrouod 0.8 In 1976
2.5 In 1980
llu.
Surfac* 1.0-3.0 In 1980
4.0 In 1982
Graan
Surfaca 2.8 In 1976
3.6 In 1980
Uua
Ondarground 1.0 In 1975
1.1 In 1976
12 (1.0-2.0 In I960)
n (0.5 In 1)78)
llu*
Surfac* 5.0 In 1»85
Graan
Surf a c*
0.7 In 1980
Blua
Coal Ajxalyila
Molft - 29.21
Sulfur - 0,8*
Itu/lb - 1.200
Main - 13. 7S
Sulfur - 0.89!
ttu/lb - 10.698
Holit - U.JX
Aih - 6.6X
Sulfur - 0.9Z
Scu/lb - 10.800

Holit - 12. OX
Aah - 7.JI
Sulfur - 0.51
Itu/lb - 10,200
Mol.c - 13. OS
Aih - 11.51
Sulfur - 0.4X
Bcu/lb - 9,800

Holat - 12.lt
Aab - 9.01
Sulfur - 0.4X
Scu/lb - 10.800
U 1 a .C«>
flannad
Currant future
26 190

90

135 1))
(125 In 1974) ta>
120 120
(150 In l»76)(d'

100
                                                     (continued)
-------
                                          TABLE B-5.   (Continued)
U)
CO
Naa* and
Lo4«tteo
at Klaa Type of Kin*
Ukal Surf act
* 41*42*
W 110*14'
Uocsli County
DC HIM. Surface
Skull Joint
I 41*42*
W 110*11'
Lincoln County
Sorenaoa Surface
X 41*42*
V 110*)4'
Lincoln County
twin Cteek Surface
X il*47*
W UO*J4'
Llncole County
111 Horn 11 Surface
X 44*5)'
V 104*S«'
Sh«rU«n County
Hack luite Surface
S 11*34'
U lOI'll'
Su«otv«t*r County
Cherokee Surface
S 41*42'
• ior*;5'
Swaetwttet County
Currenc and
Mtnoad Future
ft eduction
(•lllleo tooi/yr>:
Mae Color Indicator1*'
1.0 la 1975
1.1 In 1974
1.1 la 1910
'llue
1.0-2.0 la ItlO
1.7 la 117}
2.1 in 1974
3.0-4.7 la 1910
1.0 In 1910
Ore en
O.I la 1974
1.5 la 1910
Hue
4.2 la 1910
Manned op«a 1977
Green
4.0 In 1914
ltd
Coal Analyili
BoUt • 10.41
A>b - i.o:
Sulfur - 0.71
Itu/lk - 10,200
Haiti - 20.9X
Ask - 4. II
Sulfur - 0.4X
Itu/lb - 9,500
Molit - 20.91
A>b - 4.K
Sulfur - 0.6X
Itu/lk - 9,500

Molit - 24.5!
A.h - 3.IZ
Sulfur - 0.7:
Icu/U - 9.100
Molit - 17.7:
Aah - 1.5:
Sulfur - O.C
Icu/lk - 9.700
MoUt - 21.9::
Aah - H.J6I
Sulfur - 1.75*.
Itu/lb • 1.000
(c)
Manned
Current fututi
(ISO In 1974)")
60 100
)00 350
200
69 69
35 ZOO

                                                      (continued")
-------
                                                         TABLE JJ-5.   (Continued)
ro
Name and
Location
of Mine
Jim Bridger
N 41*46'
W 108°4S'
Sueetuater County
Rainbow 18
N 41*31'
W 109°13'
Sueetuater County
Stansbury 11
N 41*41'
W 109°ir
Sweetwater County
Current and
Planned Future
Production
(million tons/yr);
Type of Mine Map Color Indicator*1"'
Surface 3.4 in 1976
7.5 in 1980
Green
Underground 0.1 In 1976
0.2 in 1980
Blue
Underground Opening planned for
1978
1.4 in 1980
Blue
Coal Analysis
Moist -
Ash - 9.
Sulfur -
Btu/lb -
Moist -
Ash - 4.
Sulfur -
Btu/lb -
Moist -
Ash - 4.
Sulfur -
Btu/lb -
20.51
n
0.5X
9,300
11. «
22
0.9X
11.700
17. 5Z
7X
1.1Z
10.500
Employment 'c'
Planned
Current Future
120 200
(165 in 1976)(d)
70 70
(83 in 1976)(d)
30 275
                     (a                            --.«.-
                         Based on Bureau of Mines  Information Circular 6772  (Rich, 1978); Bureau of Mines Information Circular  8719
                         (Corsentino,  1976);  Keystone Coal  Industry Manual (Nieison, 1977), and Mineral Industry Location System
                         (USBM. 1978).

                     ( ' In order to be  Indicated  on the map. a mine had to:  (1) have development planned for 1980 or later  and
                         (2) be located  with  latitude-longitude or by some other detailed description.  The total increase in ton-
                         nage was calculated  as  the maximum projected value minus the current value-with blue • 0-1.99,  green •
                         2.0-5.99,  and red  -  6.0 or greater (these were converted to symbols in this report,  Figure 3).

                         Unless otherwise noted, employment figures are from Bureau of Mines Information Circular 8772 (Rich, 1978).
                     (d)
                         From Keystone  Coal  Industry Manual  (Nlelson, 1977).
-------
        APPENDIX C



ANALYSIS OF MORTALITY RATES

SEX-AGE
DISEASE
CATEGORY WHITE MALE
WHITE FEMALE
NON-WHITE MALE
NON-WHITE FEMALE

1 24 25-44 45-64
TOT MN(') 6.9 27.4 264.2
GI-MN (t>> 0.1 4.3 63.4
RT-MN (c) 0.3 4.4 96.0
UT-MN N) O.I 1.0 13.5
CARDIO '4.1 42.4 559.6
ISCHEMIA 0.3 27.3 429.0
C£REBR(9) 1.0 5.5 52.1
£ RESPIRC') 3.7 3.9 54.5
o
CIRRIIS(') 0.1 3.4 51.5
MV ACC(J) 41.8 50.7 33.2
SU-IIOMCO 14.5 46.7 47.0
±65
1208.9
347.5
296.5
82.8
4098.8
2674.4
810.8
548.6

58.0
53.1
51.5
1 24
5.1
0.1
0.1
0.1.
3.3
0.1
1.1
3.1

0.2
15.3
4.9
25-44
11.4
4.4
1.8
0.4
17.6
4.6
6.3
4.0

5.2
14.0
15.8
45-64
232.5
45.4
31.0
6.5
204.7
122.5
47.2
25.5

26.1
13.3
17.7
±65
745.6
254.2
60.4
32.7
3163.1
1786.1
861.8
314.8

22.4
21.3
14.4
i 24
4.2
.0
.0
.0
4.9
.0
2.3
10.8

0.5
73.5
45.2
25-44 45-64 ±65 1
32.6 279.2 1131.8 3
9.3 89.2 273.9 1
4.7 104.4 346.6
1.4 20.5 104.2
91.7 716.3 2867.2 5
38.6 472.8 1720.8
20.0 118.6 564.7 0
18.6 77.6 557.4 12

79.1 151.7 89.7 1
125.7 74.0 72.7 26
156.9 89.2 89.7 16
24
.9
.4
.0
.0
.9
.0
.6
.3

.4
.8
.2
25-44
35.7
4.S
3.1
.0
34.4
10.3
12.0
12.0

72.7
53.6
43.3
45-64
314.2
90.5
33.5
9.1
280.7
135.5
105.9
48.0

96.9
20.8
20.8
±65
671.6
277.8
59.1
37.2
2887.8
1524.8
678.2
P12.2

28.4
21.9
15.3

(a) Total malignant neoplasms.
(b) Malignant neoplasms of the
(c) Malignant neoplasms of the
(d) Malignant neoplasms of the





gastrointestinal
respiratory
tract

system.
.






urinary tract.















(e)
(f)
(9)
(h)
(0
(J)
(k)
Major cardiovascular disease
Ischemic heart disease.
Cerebrovascular disease.
Respiratory disease.
Cirrhosis of the liver.
Motor vehicle accidents.
Suicides and homicides.
.



























-------
                               TABLE C-2.  STANDARDIZED MORTALITY RATIOS  (BY COUNTY)
IsJ

STATES 1Y
COUNTY
_ -c otoftA CO-
ADA HS
ALANOSA
ARAPAHOE.
ARCMULETA
a AC A

BOULDER
CMAFFEE
CHEYENNE
CLEAR CREEK
CONE JOS
COSTILLA
CROHLEV -
. CVSTEft
DELIA
DENVEft
DOLORES
DOUGLAS
EAGLE
ELBERT

2
E

1.170
0.014.

0.521
0.952
1.039
0.551
0.922
0.971
1.015
0.563
1.001
0.737
1.4,77
0.101
1.064, n
1.691
0.1.14,
0.776
0.528

^
M
(J

1.067
0.54.6
0.71}
0.8SS
0.64,1
0.601
0.604,
1.24.3
0.622

0.294.
1.312
1.051

0.94,6
1.072
1.4,29.
0.507
0.911
0.899

\

_J.15%
1.117
0.927
0. 330
1.212
1.04.2
O.«74t
0.919
1.190
2. J31
0.531
0.631,
0.063
1.270
0.908
1.051
1.3Z1
1.24.8
1.04.1
O.S67

S
I

O.«l)
1.712
0.17«,
.000
0.516
0.4,10 _
0.4,67
1.3Z2
1.4,2)
0.757
.000
.000
0.7)7
2.11 5
0. 74. 1
1.14,7
.000 .
0.306
.000
.000

V
o
»-*

JJ»»
0.74,1
0.791
0.930
0.699
0.10)
0.601
1.911
1.021
_•_•£'*

0.711
JjJL'JL.
0.71)
1.117
J-9??_-
0.136
1.4,81
0.4,88
0.599

1

1.1)0
0.7*2
1.766
0.91S
0.672
0.11)
0.625
0.954,
1.121
9.500

0.5St,
1.3))
0.4>57
0.04,0
0.955
0.4,4.)
1.500
0.4.05
0.710

3

0.167
0.669
0.751
fl.m
0.699
0.051
1.509
0.694,
1.201
0.515
0.611
0.04.6

0.762
1.91)

1.164,
0.4.4.1
0.4)11
0.107

2
S

1.359
0.109
o.oio
1.364,
1.016
1.701
1.969
1.221
1.21)
_Ltll»
?}«»6
0.504.
_fiil.*J_
.100
1.217
1.002
.000
0.66).
0.113
0.600

G

0.010
0.906
0.64,2
1.629
.001
0.584,
0.4.61
1.4,21
.001
1.362
1.250
.010

,000
1.51)
	 1.294,
.001
l.)54,
0.26)
.000

3

0.74,4,
0.754,
0.521,
1.0)0
2.330
1.910
1.797
0.555
1.4.99
_1.«,10
1.64,9
3.2)6

0.194,
0.911
_J.602
.000
0.711
1.4.2)
t,2d9

\

1.14.0
l.*3)
0.102
.000
0.74,9
1.791
0.751
1.615
0.91*
1.106
0.599
1.4,9)
O.)0l
.*•'•?«
0.792
If."*
0.707
• 0.51*
1.24,9
0.561
                                                      (continued)
-------
TABLE C-2,  (Continued)
3
runs iv g
COUNTY **
s
I
*J
1
3 so \ 2
B 0 «
* 2fl 3 :
3 3
•COtOKAPO- 	 __ 	 . 	 	
CL PASO
FREMONT
CtMICLB
CUM*
GRAND
CUNNISON
HINSOAIC
HUfRFANO
JACKSON
JCFFfRSON
K10MA
KIT CARSON
LA PLATA
LAS AN IMA 5
LINCOLN
LOG AN
MESA
MINfRAL
1.912
0.919
1.411

0.911
0.791
o.iot
1.067
1.191
0.9S6
l.lll
1.24.9
1.027
1.099
0.121
1.900
1.161
l.lll
•.906 1.
0.600 I.
.*•*»». . 9t
.001 t.
.III 1.
0.121 0.
1.612
0.997 1.
1.701 0.
1.012 0.
1.206 0.
1.1.21 0.
1.197 	 1.
1.020 1.
0.671 . 0.
, 0.*S1 .. 1.
1.069 0,
1.111 1.
(.171 1.
.Ill
902 (.1
ZOt 0.

119 .
%5fc (•
6*1 2.
000
110 0.
»?? •
919 0.
170 ].
066 1.
9J1__I.
126 1.
169 	 1.
02
IS6

III
716
919
III
•69
III
9*6
1.12
166
•01 ,
109
»*«.
925
017
9«,0
000
0.091
1.117
«.6T2
1.669
• .956
(.761
• .906
1.130
I.I**
O.I3A
».*/9
(.795
_0.7SS
0.030
l.*75
1.169
1.1(6
1.171
(.115
(.199
1.161
1.6(6
0.6*Z
0.909
0.766
1.91*
1.266
1.336
1.166
0.919
0.920
0.062
1.119...
1.61Z
1.072
0.060
0.66Z
0.926
0.11*
O.tll _,
0.169
0.7*0
0.609
0.667
1.710
«.S*7
1.701
• .537
».<.6«
._»•"•-
0.636
.0.716 _
0.619
• .696
1.975
.000
1.20".
1.361.
0.911
1.19*
(.26*
1.17*
.100
• .991
.III
1.92*
1.261
1.640
_ 1.196 	
0.760
0.650 	
l.lll
1.161
1.130
0.432
.001
1.070
• .691
0.176
.010
.000
0.156
6.260
1.99?
2.997
1.611
0.071
0.600
1.676
0.611
1.601
2. MO
1.266
0.761
.010
0.637
1.117
1.333
1.561
1.566
1.201
2.»*l
1.137
1.55?
1.61*
2.720
0.177
_•••»
	 1.991
2.012
1.121
1.611
1.271
1.061
I.7Z?
I.57J
2.961
1.919
.III
.000
1.120
1.715
1.116
1.616
1.6(3
1.116
1.216
	 1.761
l.lll
1.11*
1.191
1.226
1.765
      (continued)
-------
                                             TABLE  C-2.   (Continued)
          STATES IT
           COUNTY
f»
u
      -COLORAOO-
N)
-P-
HOFfAT
_ NONTE*ONA_
NON THOSE
NOR CAN
01CRO
OU*»f
PARK
PHILLIPS
PI1KIN
PROMERS
PUf BLO
RIO BIANCO
«IO CRANOC
ROUTT
SACUACHC
SAN JUAN
SAN MIGUEL
SEOGMICK
SUMHIT
TELLER
(
	 	 0
o
0
0
0
0
0
„
I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
.625
0.631
.711 	 O.C.Z3
i.9.53 	 «.v3?L_
.675 0.617
.720
.-•?*._„
.719
.923
.753
.071
.895 	
.771
.975
.135
.701
.305
.720
.097
.633
0.961
0.570
... 0,31$
1.309
0.156
0.115
1.165
0.817
.000
0.790
O.ZJ9
1.Z57
.000
1.159
1.171
0.606
1.055
1.021
0.987 	
0.736
0.9ZS
0.506
0.517
0. 711
1.155
1. 118
0.203
1.162
0.321
0.769
. 000
1.000
1.229
0. 707
0.710
.000
0.637 	
1.390
0.372
0.759
0.601
0.01*
0.891.
0.921
1.029
*»%U 	 _lj**»
_ .100 	 O.(91
0.569 1.210
.000
0.600
0.889
I.9ZO
0.710
.000
0.087
.000
.000
0.832
1.100
0.610
0.511
1.060
0.996
1.200
1.015
0.696
0.607
0.097
0.592
0.052
0.160
0.301
0.500
	 0.616
0.756
0.922
1.166
0.531
	 0.787
1.396
0.1S9
0.922
1.077
1.169
0.687
0.7SO
0.638
1.121
0.506
0.719
	 0.117
0.317
	 0.520
	 0.591
1.051
0.962
0.903
	 !s«/L
	 0.350
0.137
0.796
0.593
0.786
1.61*
o.soo
1.026
.000
0.609
0.610
0.911
1.107
1.320
1.156
0.201
	 ,000_
0.351
0.553
0.716
I.IK
1.230
0.937
0.631
0.132
.000
1.569
	 0.019
	 .000
0.221
0.5*7
	 O.S66
0.667
0.612
D.83J
.000
.000
0.100
0.310
0.906
1.191
0.966
1.158
0.939
1.220
.000
.000
	 .000
	 .000
.000
2.1
	 1.1
1.0
1.3
1.2
	 JL«_>
	 0.8
	 1.0
1.5
0.9
0.7
1.8
1.1
O.ti
1.01
.01
. I.9J
1.9'
..... *•»<
1.91
                                                                                                               1.171
                                                                                                               0.853
                                                                                                               1.019
                                                                                                               jum
                                                                                                               1.639
                                                                                                              _2.386
                                                                                                              _J.Z5»_
                                                                                                               O.C.V
                                                                                                               1.777
                                                        (continued)
-------
                                        TABLE C-2.   (Continued)


MATES IT
CMOMtK
"• f.

1 *
P M
P o
"3 5

? ?
a E
7
o
§
S 3
H 2
S 9
1 9
3 3
w «^
" a
c §
9 §
3 S

S vk
-COXOR«OQ-
WASHINCtOM
WE 10
»0«A

-NOMTANA-
BEAVERMC^O
QIC HORN
BLA1NC
pROAOMATER
fAKOOH
(AHIEK
CASCADE
CHOUIEAU
COSIER
PAMULS
OAWSOM
__OCtR LOOCE
f ALL OK
fEROUS
riAtHtAO
(.<9fc
(.r»i
(.7(1


l.Zfl".
1.119
,.,„
1.1.1*
I.*t7
l.**r
i,(f(
(.*ZI
(.«zr
i,»i*
(. m
	 (.9f» 	
i.ztr
(.9I*>
(,*»(
••"i.
(./«.»
(,%9


J.39".
i.m
i.nr
Itfll
I.U*
)t6I7
••111
(.fit
l.(7t>
1:114.
1.3(1
!•"•>
JO'l
f.tl*
(.S(^
(.fit
(.Mr
i.m


n/«
(. ri*
._§•»»>.
i. rtr
«.rz»
0. 198
1. 3(Z
». *J3
(.«<•(
1. Jl»
(.139
	 1.1(9
«.ir*
j. rz9
(. («9
t.zi r
i.*-»"i
(.977


t.litl
O.*ih(
(.-7*
.((1
!.(!(
l.»3» _
(.9SJ
I.Z(9
1.6*1
.**(
«.<••*
	 (.»(» ..
!.(<•?
(.73*>
(.9(6
(.(((
• .(II
i.m


U(6t
• .969
1.ZZ7
ff*f*>
(.(76
(.(37
(.9«>
l.(9(
1.196
(.(»6
(.9(1
(.9(1
.».••!*
1.013
_(.9*(
(.797
(.(((
».7*t

•
1. 76t
(.631
«.(U
(.697
(.S(7
(.761
(.739
1.93Z
(.130
(.73(
l.*U 	
1.19*
1.99<>
(.6(9
.(((
(.37«.
(.69*


1.1.31
1.999
(.9(6
«.b«.6
(.676
.(((
(,9«_
(.151
^(.93«i
(.Zll
(.6(1
(.6(1


1.096
(.671
	 (.(56
1.517
__(.695
(.679
I.(
-------
TABLE C-2.   (Continued)
STATES IT
COUNTY
5 ~&
E A
H 0
*-**-» *"* ^
t* -o £ ^
Is IB § |
3 2 **
i i • i
i s* i
-MONTANA-
^GALLAIIN
GARFIELO
GLACIER
GOLDEN VAUEr
GRANITE
HILL
JEFFERSON
JUDITH BASIN
_LAKE 	
_ LEWIS « CLARK
LIBERTY
LINCOLN
MC CONE
HAOISON
HE A CHER
MINERAL
NISSOUL*
MUSSEL SHELL
PARK
0.009
H.313
1.3Z7
1.311
0.997
O.OVl
O.V19_
1.056
0.177
1.165
o.vso
1.001
1.V26
0.9VO
0.971
0.396
0.6)2
0.5Z5
l.bOl
O.«61
1.1Z5
0.660
1.000
0.1Z3
1.333
O.OV2
l.UO
1.111
0.761
1.090
0.737
0.75V 0.603
r_in__o* y fO ^_a
_ 1.190

1. 731
0.9-.5
1.601
0.057
.000
_1.0ZZ 	
.000
1. 71,7
0. 770
1.150
1.002
0.960
1. 19V
0.670
0.79V
.000
0.079
.000
.000
0.57)
0.605
1.012
_0.570
1.06)
7.613
1.133
.000
O.V72
.000
2.791
0.7V6
O.Ik)
o.ett
0.910
0.059 	
0.027
1.00*
0.660
0.703
	 0.95* 	
0-90V
1.300
1.139
1.209
0.619
0.975
0.590
0.91V
0.032
_UZ.#* 	 ».*«> 	
(.610
0.769
J.596 	
0.669
1.01*
0.615
0.591
0.916 _
0.000
1.557
1.102
1.112
0.510
0.616
0.551
0-920 __
0.729
0.905
o.ooo
0.791
1.271
0.601
C.7S5
0.001
0.30V
0.951
0.719
0.500
0.7V 7
0.769
0.61Z
0.913
0.256
_0.991
_J.120
	 0.0 7_1 	
2.V06
0.951
O.V13
	 O.V16 	
1.17V
0.903
	 0.155 	
0.991
(.09V
• 0.930
O.V72
1.155
1.600
1.0V5
0.976 	
1.07V
(.053
Jf.*'l 	 *i".'._
.tOO 1.322
_.ooo
0.6V5
1.036
1.099
_.ooo
0.301
1.020
0.000
.000
0.761
0.295
.000
0.627
_0.3fO
0.393
O.V03
	 0,;69|
.000
	 2.V27 	 (.609
	 V.7I2 	 1.16S
	 I.V06 	 (•*»>
(.073 0.711
0.615
	 (.070
(.9(1
1.150
0.016
(.Oil
1.707
1.061
0.677
	 0.92«_
2.666
1.61*
O.V69
_.O.V7I
1.172
.(((
1.037
I. ISO
0.519
J.296
_ 0.952
(.10*
0.020
         (continued)
-------
                                     TABLE C-2.   (Continued)
    ITAUS IT
    COUNTY

-HONTANA-
CflROLCWf 2.
_,rnIlllPS 	 1.
, rONDFRA 1.
fOMtU 1.
PRMRIC 1.
RAVAILI 1.
R1CHIANO 1.
LJ ROpSWlT 1.
Roscauo o.
_SANO£RS 	 1.
, SHERIDAN i.
	 S 11 «R, 60M 	 1 .
_ ST1LLMMER 	 	 0.
SMtEI CRASS 1.
1EIOM 1.
_tOOLI 	 	 	 1.
TREASURE 1.
VALlEt 1.
NHEAKANO 1.
3*1
• 11
JIU
•21
IM
912
• 05
•51
7JO
1*9
• 07
1*7
•1*
671
.III
	 (.691
».«>*
	 ,(00
1.115
1.152
1.191
1.199
I.MI
O.lll
	 1.201
	 t.215
_ 0.619
1.511
1.519
1.352
.100
1.911
I.7J6
*. 6*9
1.671
(.691
1.626
,»•*»» , ^

	 !•_»*! 	
0.579
._._..,•»__
	 l.(22 	
1.7*0 	
1.631
1.919
_.,.«-•»•._
1.511
1.711
6.179
1.6(1
(. *46
I.Zr*. 	 1.191 _..|.Z9J _
_.»»« 	 •.•»! • .(*• 	
...((».. __f.67« 	 ••••» 	
I.*9I 1.016 0.972
.Oil
1.196
1.115
• .11%
Il566
0.605
1.711
1.107
1.559
1. 151
1.102
__U»tL
	 1.861
	 i.m.
I.«7J_
• .616
	 jLt"!.
	 .LIZ*
• .••7
(.992
• .117
(.((1
(.976
	 isMS 	
	 (.019 	
1.1*6
1.05*
1.401
- •• 751
(.966
	 1.11* 	
1.502
(.0*1
	 1.325 	
1.015
t.«62
• .510
• .619
•••»' .....
(.191 	

(.771
I. (16 	
1.151
1.062
0.612
1.012 	
1.2*7
1.26*
t.25J 	
• .561
(.*](
1.536
.III .III
,.%,,
	 1.102
1.9 7fc 	 .(••
0.710 l.**Z
0.520
0.712
1.679
.000
(.21%
0.70*
1.519 .(01
	 1.171 	 0.5*1
1.052 1. 9(1
	 l.%U 	 _Z.»61
1.592 1.245
Z.16I .0(0
1.1*1 I. (11
1.1*2 (.709
0.0*0 2.6bO Z.%99 l.(73
1.211
(.529
1.09*
1.001
1.571
1.591
0.1.60
o.rn
0.580
„. *•*"
... •«»*'
	 1.509
	 .080
1.551
1.911
	 0.361
.001
1.021
2.345
2. J77 (.%51
2.901 	 1.173
2.109 1.161
	 l.*93 	 (.901
(.6*1 1.153
(.702 0.972
0.342 1.116
	 2.119 	 •.,•!•
(.IK .(01
I.%(Z (.967
.Oil .III
                                              (continued)
-------
TABLE C-2.  (Continued)
STATES IT
COUNTY
3s5sSS3,8
5 is 1 Is i 8 8 £
HtTToZQMui
3 3 2^
-NQSTANA-
MtSAUX
YELLOWSTONE
0.41.9 1.3d? .000 .000 (.923 1.0(1 1.011 0.731
1.04 1.011 1.1(0 1.961. 0.116 1.779 1.007 (.400
.OBI 3.037 .000
o.m (.99* o.iu

-H. DAKOTA- , ... , ,,.
ADAMS
BARNES
BENSON

BOTTINtAU
eownAN
BURKE
OURLEICM .
CASS
CAVALIER
DICKEY
DIVIDE
PUNH
eiiov
0.91.1
1.219
0.912
0.1.1.1
0.111
o.ot*
1.109
1.021
0.917
0.69
1.2J9
1.967
0.11.6 O.Vt_
0.020
_Jt553
l.<>29
1.166
0.11.2
0.091
|.053
0. Z13
0.992
0.993
0.166
1. 777
0.311.
0.399
1.137
0.1.23
.000
__ 0.7fll_
.000
0.699
l.9«,5
.000
0.939
1.909
0.971
0.019
2.292
0.01.0
.000
O.(9«i
_ .'••".
0.9C<>
0.327
	 0.973
1.195
0.977
0.16*
0.060
0.71,7
1.019
_. 1.027
	 S-.0..92.
o.i: 3
(.191
1.131
0.976
0.507
1.129
1.262
I.9J3
0.9«.9
1.72*
0.7I.O
1.196
1.070
0.697
0.101
1.971
.000
0.720
1.212
1.190
__.0.77«. 	
0.193
__•.«•. 	
0.667
1.001
	 t*Mt 	 »».'».? 	
0.7".". 0.707
t.612
l.Odl
0.933
2.117
0.932
0.120
1.661
0.663 	
0.116
o.m
.•.«•• 	
1.110
0.901
1.01A
1.029
1.711
.000
Jl.tl9
.000
0.937
0.976
.001
J.103
1.192
0.99J ?rJ«
2.060
1.013
0.27t
1.611
1.9<>>
... .!«.•...
0.747
	 l.OJO.
2. IK.
(.137 	
0.612
	 l..0|* 	
	 0.91I> 	
1.311
2. ".69
1.191
0.131
0.101
1.990
.000
,1.336
0.796
0.309
••»«'
0.663
_•-•?'*
_0.
-------
                                             TABLE C-2.  (Continued)
oo
STAftl Of
COUNTI
"S
IS
&
1
5
1
1
§M I
3
i 2t 1 1 1
.«, BWQTA-
trniONJ

(MHO FORKS
HUNT
CKI6CS
HCMINCCft
KIOOCK
LA HOURE
IOCIN
MC HFHMV
HC INIOSM
NC KENriC
HC lt*»
Ht«C£«
nORION
HOUMTHAll
MIL SON
OLIVER
, PCMBIN*
0.991
0.910

0,970
1.159
1.0*1
0.997
0.919
0.971
0.019
0.9M
1.079
1.199
0.015
0.91*
1,025
1.050
0.6*1
0.59*
0.9*5
(.021
0.026
0,*96
0.991
1.256
1.60*
1.296
0.67*
1.096
0. 792
1.256
1.709
1.205 	
I.OJ7
I.VO,
1.001
1.196
0.*52
1.127
1.070
1x141
Ml.
1.015
0.061
l.*71
J.02?
1.7*9
0.992
0.7*9
0.029
|.1*>Z
O.Ob*
0.72*
1^050
0.592
0.660
	 M??
1.009
1.7*1
.000
1.010
.000
0.95*
0.1S*
1.210
1.959
1.1*0
2.097
1.172
1.611
1,5*9
.000
0.217
l.O'O
	 0.969 	
0.929
1.291
0.067
1.200
1.009
1.176
	 1.109
0.912
0.9)*
0.027
1.15*
0.99*
0.909
1.002
1.215
0.91*
1.117
0.066
Jilli.
1.099
1.019
1.120
0.75*
1.270
0.010
1.197
1.279
0.971
1.01*
0.566
1.19*
i.zoo
1.100
1.090
1.15*
0.759
0.971
1.021
2.160
0.690
0.572
l.*01
0.766
1.169
0.722
0.011
0.990
0.71*
O.*6t
1.01)
0.092
0.675
0.721
1.070
0.701
0.726
1.509
0.27*
0.7*6
0.169
0.09*
0.7*6
1.7*0
1.171
1.259
O.*61
0.*7J
0.702
0.0*1
1.141
0.&50
0.953
0.919
l.*77
1.0*6
1.591
0.5*1
0.719
.000
.000
0.76*
0.195
0.192
1.001
.000
.000
.000
0.502
0.111
0.9*9
0.010
.000
0.1*6
0.652
.000
.000
0.526
1.007
0.706
	 1.321
._.. ••'•*
0.670
1.392
1.20*
0.705
0.036
0.257
0.*5*
1.369
1.310
0.672
1.199
2.5*2
0.717
_1.)97 	
1.1. (.8
.000
0.959
0.529
0.971
0.269
0.290
.000
0.710
0.021
0.1*1
1.172
0.022
0.195
O.*fc7
0.156
0.50*
1.250
0.0(9
0.5*5
0.115
                                                        (continued)
-------
                                                  TABLE C-2.   (Continued)
               STATES If
               COUNTY
£
a
           •|l. MKOTA-
\D
PIERCE
_RAHSEY 	
BCMVULE
RICHLANO
, ROlETie
SARGENT
SHCRIOAN
SIOUX
SLOPE
S1AHK
SIEELE'
STUTSKAN
TOWNER
TRA1U
WALSH
WARD
WfLlS
WILLIAMS
0>79<>
	 _..!•»«_
1.019
0.175
0.960
1.170
0.614
0.91,1
0.490
0.910
1.011
0.700
0.079
1.102
0.929
0.992
0.911
0.944
0.477
1.062
	 1.216 _
1.011
0.917
1.167
1.129
0.605
0.756
0.271
.000
1.144
0.357
1.110
0.941
1.113
o.a«2
1.120
0.919
1.1(7
._ ».*n
__0.991 	
0.797
0.406
0.720
0.604
0.700
0.754
0.007
1.022
0.722
0.690
0.004
0.563
0.559
0.712
0.024
0.791
0.469
1.5*4
_ 0.97 4 	
_J._09!
0.055
1.174
3.421
1.123
0.921
3.216
7.595
1.511
0.000
_«.«» 	
.000
0.269
0.771
1.102
1.720
0.402
_0.099__
_.0.999 _
_i.l4« 	
1.270
0.942
O.OJ2
1.016
1.016
0.903
1.122
1.257
0.965
_J.9»2
1.120
0.937
0.966
0.905
1.100
1.101
0.911
...0.970_
1.459
0.042
0.934
1.021
1.043
1.059
1.151
1.376
0,704 T
1.040
1.246
0.063
0.960
0.957
1.235
1.130
0.7*5
0.031
1.327
0.420
1.147
1.170
0.616
0.245
1.206
1.113
!••*•.
1.079
1.126
1.029
0.041
0.099
0.906
0.75*
_»?*«§_
0.560
1.176
1.332
0.544
0.611
1.900
.000
0.625
1.710
0.009
0.621
1.713
1.155
0.644
0.506
0.094
0.672
_ 0.970 _.
_J»..£77 	
.000
0.241
0.792
1.032
.000
5,901
.000
0.741
	 jOOO 	
0.201
.000
0.021
0.301
0.730
0.255
0.377
_.*•*"._
._•••".._
1.775
0.607
1.067
1.102
1.191
_J»204 .
0.746
0.926
0.92*
0.07*
1.566
-. M*7
_0.4I6
—lli'-l
0.401
0.126
.000
0.374
1.200
.too
(.119
.000
. ».,m
0.104
_U«l__»llA3
0.900 0.711
0.723
0.919
_1.206
_0.45§
0.610
0.241
                                                            (continued)
-------
                                            TA1JLE C-2.  (Continued)


mm IT
•s
21
g

fi
I

w
S
A £
*•* O 3
I I l'
u 0 >
333
r •} •< v
! 1 S !
5 3
J 8 X
9 5
! e £
BEAVER
BOX ClOM

CARBON
PAGGEfT
DAVIS
pUSMESKC
CHERT
CARHUO
CRAHO
IRON
JUAB
KANE
nlLLARO

PIUTE
RICH

JAN JUAN
SAMfEIt
SEVIER
..997
0.916
1.609
0. (26
.Oil
0.101

1.791
0.12*
1.111
1.171
0.600
1.677
1.551
l.lll
l.lll

1.1*0

0.611
«.*69
1.6*1 0.669
1.922 1.959
0.76* 1.209
1. 1*6 1.061
,101 .110

f.61? 0.*7»
1,799 I. (59
0.*9S .001
1.7*1 1.607
1.176 1.6*9
0.537 .000
1.676 0.912
1.7*1 1.991
1.9(1 l.lll
l.**6 l.*2E
l.*tl .100

1.191 0.751
1.514 1. *«6
1. 280 t.195
.III
l.ue

l,*27
.(ft
1.665 	

1,250
.001
.III

.Oil
1.101
_Jr«»

2.109

• .731
.011
l.(22
t.266
• .170
!.97»
1.171
0.960
0.760
0.000
0.511
0.119
1.769
0.9*«
0.717
1.111
0.716
1.777
0.199
„-!*!«
1.2*7
l.ll*
1.162
1.1*6
r.iot
f.(»9
1.1*7
1.765
1.141
0.7M
0.012
0.5*9
1.712
1.610
0.711
0.721
0.171
0.757
1.719
1.169
1.161
1.161
1.121
1.269
1.011
• .(••
1.959
1.199
1.116
0.619
!,*«•?
0.700
1.621
1.129
0.6*2
1.129
0.019
1.291
l.*0t
(.751
1.616
I.«6I
|.I77
l.lll
1.212
1.159
1.719
0.279
0.919
1.6*1
1.71*
1.199
0.710
0.710
0.**6
0.169
1.250
0.911
0.75*
1.2*9

0.617
1.9*1
1.129
1.716
1.2(6
(.121
1.619
1.099
0.192 _
O.**l
0.70*
.010
O.*0(
(.929
(.319
(.637
O.*19
1.771
.000
.001
0.519
.001
,000
.000
0.711
0.1*1
1.371
1.551
l.*09
1.067
1.551
1.39*
1.266
O.*90
1.177
0.521
l.lll
1.Z29
0.755
2.0*1
1.310

1.011
1.015
1.595
1.711
2.191
1.765
1.2*9
1.767
1.911
0.692
1.319
.100
0.666
0.929
0.911
2.301
0.229
0.6*0
.000
.000
.•11
1.715
_J.I*6
1.115
0.099
0.*26
1.151
1.157
ro
Ln
O
                                                      (continued)
-------
                                              TABLE C-2.   (Continued)
N)
Cn
%j53S •- *• ""M ^ *•*
STATES 6V gj.iL.!.§SfSS§
COUNTY PoxED-DaE
3a
3
M
•UTAH-
SUMMIT
TOOEU
UINTAH
UT»H
MASATCM
WASHINGTON
MAVNE
WEOER
-MVOrllNC-
0.7*1
0.660
8.791
0.6Z2
0.581
0.699
0.9H
0.871

l.0&«.
• .995
o.rsz
o.«sz
O.rtd
0.698
1.900
t.tas

1.936
0.801
e. ru
0.630
0.3 JO
O.Z86
(.(.It
0.677

(.611
.000
9.661
0.359
1.J05
0.1.3I.
I.f7<
o.tir

t.976
I.1Z1
t.63r
e.ei9
t.rr6
(.791
o.ssz
0.936

0.911
t.27Z
0.719
0.787
I.71I>
0.710
O.S07
0.969

1.426
0.837
I.tt6
0.7Z1
0.76)
0.831
i.m
0.858

0.7Z8
0.971
0.381
0.801
1.019
0.932
0.267
0.060

1.101
0.9)2
1.751
0.639
0.725
0.299
.000
1.260

1.01$
0.967
1.629
0.67*
0.769
0.981
.000
0.76ii

I.t2t
1.016
1.SI.I
O.ldl
O.ttJ
0.103
.000
1.009

ALBANY
Bit HORN
CAMPBELL
CAK10N
CONVERSE
CROOK
ruf Hwn
cos MEM
HOT SPRINGS
JOHNSON
LARAHIE
LINCOLN
0.977
0.609
0.69*
0.912
0.029
1.016
1.030
0.6*1
1.613
1.091
1.01*
8.737
_JsJU_
0.69]
0.677
J.917
0.*69
. 1.196
0.879
0.669
1.160
0.98*
0.999
0.*6*
1.095 1,290 0.991
0.669
0.271
0.630
0,709 .000 1.066
0.9*9
0.69*
1.166
1. 19Z
1.300
1.0*6
l.*96
1.166
0.736
l.*97
1.31$
0.0*2
1.2*1
0.666
.000
.000
0.9*0
0.910
C.671
0.617
0.999
0.669
0.667
1.199
0.92*
0.696
0.60*
0.668
	 0.9*6 	
1.06)
0.60*
0.6*9
0.66$
6.867
t.062
1.339
0.690
1.001
0.696
0.721
0.*99
0.029
1.029
(.729
0.899
0.797
1.116
0.966
1.192
0.619
1.119
• .$7*
0.762
0.020
0.061
0.390 1.306
1.139 ^ 0.9*0
0.92$
0.917
0.979
1.02*
O.*10
1.239
2.296
0.792
0.910
0.66*
0.2*6
1.0**
1.706
0.162
2.290
1.400
1.2*6
0.*9*
2,9»9
1.69$
2.929
0.211
2.*00
1.026
2.917
1.161
0.92$
2.*16
0.662
0^,67*
1,086
1.673
1.26*
1.229
0.796
0.26$
1.107
0.90*
1.010
0.326
                                                        (continued)
-------
                                                                    TABLE C-2.    (Continued)
ro
Ul
ro
                                                       &
                     ITATU IT                 bA

                      COWn                   K        °

NATRONl
MIOURAKA



-
PARK
PLATIt
SIICMMN
$.UBLCm
^MfCTUATCR
TCION
UINTA
WASNAKir
MCSIOM
0.
1.
t.
0.

0.
,.
,.
0.
1.
0.
920 0.770 1.193
Ml 	 •l*»j 	 If >/L_
766 0.%»5 0.929
•tO (.002 (.006
7%l 0.766 0.97%
611 0.75% 0.625
70% 0.666 0.032
501 1.911 0.620
lit 1.059 1.560
•21 0.399 1.776
1.079 1.
	 tJM 	 1-
, ».%*9 1.
•000 1.
«.%13 •.
.000 1.
•.5%1 0.
.000 1.
•.371 0.
0.920 1.
l.«.»9 1.
f?v
710
072
030
991
79%
056
72%
7«3
063
116
1.001
0.616
0.999
•.921
• .061
0.052
1.035
(.709
• .737
0.957
1.757
0.009
0.961
1.230
1.7*0
1.210
• .639
0.570
• . 50 6
(.696
1.110
• .035
t.%60
0.761
O.tJO
0.503
0.929
I.X.%
0.710
O.%31
0.606
1.666
1.171
0.756
0.501
0.7(0
0.567
0.760
.too
1.103
1.21.5
0.606
1.%OI
0.360
1.314.
0.029
1.S7I
1.760
1.133
1.072
2.%32
1.210
1.0%5
1.952
1.630
1.02%
1.0% »
0.591
1.336
2.221
l.%50
1.201

0.722
0.963
              (•)  Tatal MllfOMl tMQflmmm*.



              (b)  H«ll|n«iit  n««pUwM of eh* (»lialntotln•«•.


              (c)  H*ll|n«nc  niofltm •( lh« t«iplr«tory tract.



              (J)  HcllfMnt  Mopl«w« of the urtiury  tract.



              (•)  Hajor carlovaacular 
-------
TABLE D-l.  INVENTORY OF PUBLIC WATER SUPPLIES:   IMPACTED COMHU1UT1ES
t
Community or
State County A rep Served
Colorado
Adams Aurora



Adams Sable Water Dls-
Iv) trlct (Aurora)
Ln
OJ Adams Brighton
Adorns Lockbule Mobile
Home Park
Adams Commerce City
Adams Denver
Adams Denver (Crentvlew
Metro Water and
Sanitation)


Adams Federal Heights
Supply
Retail Pop. Type

110.000 Combined Surface and
Well
Surface:
Ground:

4 , 500 Purchased
8.500 12 Wells
1.000 Well

34,000 11 Wells
9,000 Purchased
19,000 Purchased, Surf see snd
Well combined
Purchased :
Surface:
Ground:
5,000 Purchased

Source


S. Platte R.
Clierry freek
Well
Denver Water Bd.
local wells
local well

local wells

Denver Water Bd.
Clear Creek
3 Wells

1
JO
CO
—1
fl
C/J
3
*Td
H
3
-------
                                         TABLE D-l.   (Continued)
      State
County
                                 Community or
                                 Area  Served
Retail Fop.
                                                                 Supply
Type
                                                                           Source
    Colorado
                  Adams
             Thronton
   60,000       Combined Surface and
                  Ground
                     Surface:
                                                                                             Clear Creek
N)
in
                  Adams
                  Adams
             Westminster
              Westminster  (Shaw
                Heights Water
                District)
                     Ground:
   35,000       Combined Surface and
                  Ground
                     Surface:
                     Ground:

    5,000       Purchased
                  No information given
                                                                                             18 Hells
                                                                           Clear Creek
                                                                           Stanley Lake

                                                                           Well

Arapahoe
Anipuhoe
Anipahoe
Del ta
Del ta
Northglcnn
Englewood
Greenwood Village
Littleton
Orchard City
Delta (Town of)

1,470
3,500
1,000
3,000
6.000

Purchased
Purchased
Purchased
Croundwater :
Surface

Denver Water Dd.
Denver Water Ud.
Denver Water lid
Springs
Grand Mesa Lake
S. Grand Mesa L.
                                                      (continued)
-------
                           TABLE  D-l,   (Continued)




N)
Ul
Ul

State County
Delta
Denver
Denver

Denver
Elbert
La Plata
Community or
Area Served
Paonia
Denver
Cherry Cr. Water
and San. Dist.
Denver
Clover Water and
San. Dist.
Denver-City of
Glcndale
Elizabeth
Durango
Retail Pop.
2,000
3,100
6,400

2,200
1,000
12,000
Supply
Type Source
Ground Springs
Purchased Denver Water
Purchased Denver Water

Ground Local wells
Surface Florida R.

Bd
Bd



La Plata
La Plata
Las AnJmas
Durango-Tamaron
  Public Util.
  Dist.

Durango-Purgatory
  Water and San.
  District

Trinidad-Monument
  Lake Park
Las Animas   Trinidad
 1,300


 1.000


 1,000

11,000
Ground


Surface

Ground
Animas R.
     *


3 local wells


Monument Lake

North Lake
Monument Lake
                                   (continued)
-------
                                     TABLE D-l.  (Continued)
Scate       County
  Community or
  Area  Served
Retail Pop.
Type
                                                                             Supply
                                                                                      Source
            Moffut       Craig
     , AGO
                                     Surface
                  Yampa  R,
            Rio Illanco   Meeker
                         1,600       Surface
                                        White  River  No.
                                        White  River  No.
            Rio Blanco   Rangely
                         1»800       Surface
                                       White  River
            Routt        llnydcn
                         1,000       Surface
                                       Yampa  River
            Routt
Steamboat Springs        2,800        Surface
                                       Fish Creek
Nortli
Dakota
McCone
Burlelgh
McLean
Circle
Bismarck 35,000 Surface
Garrison 1,700 Ground
Missouri R.
Wells 1,4,5,6
                                              (continued)
-------
                        TABLE D-l.   (Continued)
State

North
Dakota
County
Mercer
Mercer
Community or Supply
Area Served Retail Pop. Type Source
Beulah 1,344 Ground Well 1,2
Hazen 1,600 Ground Well 1,2,3
Morton
Marxian
11,000
Surface
                                                            Missouri  R.
Carbon
Carbon
Carbon
Helper
Price
Wellington
 2,200
12,000
 1,050
Ground
Surface and Ground

    Surface:
    Ground:
Purchased
Spring Canyon
Fish Creek Spr.
UP & L Well Colt
Price R. Wt.
Colton Springs
Upper Colton
  Springs
Upper & Lower
  Well

City of Price
                                   (continued)
-------
                                           TABLE D-l.  (Continued)
      State       County

  Community or
  Area  Served
Retail Pop.
                                                                                   Supply
Type
Source
      Wyoming
                  Emery        lluntington
                  Campbell      Gillette
                         1,000       Ground
                        10,000       Ground
                                       Big Bear Canyon
                                       Little Bear
                                         Canyon
                                       Approx. 25
                                         wells
a
oc-
                  Carbon       Rawllns
                  Lincoln      Kcmmerer
                        10,000       Surface and Ground
                                          Surface:

                                          Ground:

                         3,000       Surface
                                       Sage Creek Res.
                                       N. Platte River
                                       Sage Creek Basin

                                       Hams Fork River
                  Sheridan     Sheridan
                         8,000       Surface
                                       Big Goose Creek
      Utah
                  Emery
Kerron
    1,000        Surface
                                                     (continued)
                 Mlllsite Reser-
                   voir
-------
TABLE D-l.  (Continued)
Community or
State County Area Served
Colorado
Adams Aurora



Adams Sable Water Dis-
trict (Aurora)
Adams Brighton
ro Adams Lockbuie Mobile
vo Home Park
Adams Commerce City
Adams Denver
Adams' Denver (Crestview
Metro Water and
Sanitation)





Adams Federal Heights
Retail Pop. Treatment Method(s)

110,000
Coagulation. Filtration,
Disinfectant
Disinfectant only
4,500 Prechlorination

8,500 Disinfection only
1,000 Disinfection only

34,000 Disinfection only
9,000
19,000

—
Coagulation, Sedimentation,
Filtration, Taste and Odor
control, Ammoniac ion, Dis-
infection
Disinfection only
5,000 Bug Treated Water
Lab Tests


Chem/Physical

diem/Physical
None

None
None

Chem/Phyalcal
—



Chem/Physical




~—
              (continued)
-------
                                         TABLE  D-l.   (Continued)
  State
County
Community or
Area  Served
Retail Pop. Treatment Method(s)
Lab Testa
Colorado
              Adumu
              Adams
              Adumu
             Tlironton
             Westminster
             Westminster (Shaw
               Heights Water
               District)
             Northglenn
                      60,000
                      35,000
                                                    5,000
                                                            Prcchloration, Coag. Sedi-
                                                              ment, Filtration, Disin-
                                                              fection
                                                            Sedimentation, Disinfection
                                                            Prechloration, Coag. Sedi-
                                                              mentation, Filtration,
                                                              taste and odor for both
                                                            Disinfection only
                                                                              Client/Physical
                                                                              Chemical
Arapahoe
Arapahoe
Arapahoe
Delta
Englcwood
Greenwood Village
Littleton
Orchard City
1,470
3,500
1,000
3,000
Disinfection
—
—
Disinfection
None
None
None
Chemical
                                                 (continued)
-------
                                     TABLE D-l.   (Continued)
State
County
Community or
Area  Served
Retail Pop. Treatment Method(s)
                                                                                          Lab Testa
            Delta        Delta (Town of)
            Delta        Paonia

            Denver       Denver
                           Cherry Cr.  Water
                           and San.  Dist.

            Denver       Denver
                           Clover Water and
                           San. Dlst.

            Denver       Denver-City of
                           Glendale

            Elbert       Elizabeth

            La Plata     Durango
            La Plata     Durango-Tamaron
                           Public  Util.
                           Dist.

            La Plata     Durango-Purgatory
                           Water and  San.
                           District
                                      6,000  Prechlorlnation, Coag., Sedi-
                                               mentation, Disinfection
                                               (both)

                                      2,000  No  information reported
                                                                 t
                                      3,100
                                      6,400
                                      2,200   Disinfection only

                                      1,000

                                     12,000   Coag., Sediment., Filtration,
                                               Fluoridation
                                             Disinfection
                                      1,300              *
                                      1,000   Disinfection only
                                                              Chem/Physical
                                                              Chemical
                                                                                         Physical
                                                              None
                                               (continued)
-------
                                       TABLE D-l.  (Continued)
  State
County
Community or
Area  Served
Retail Pop.  Treatment Method(s)
  Lab Tests
Is)
O>
K>
              Las Animas   Trinidad-Monument
                             Lake Park
              Laa Animus   Trinidad
              Moffat
             Craig
              Rio Blanco   Meeker
              Rio Blanco   Rangely
              Routt>       llayden
              Routt         Steamboat  Springs
              McCone       Circle
                       1,000   Sedimentation, Filtration,
                                 Disinfection
                      11,000   Coag., Sedimentation, Fil-
                                 tration, Taste and Odor,
                                 Fluoridation, Disinfection
                       4,400   Prechloration, Coag., Sedi-
                                 mentation, Filtration,
                                 Taste and Odor, Fluorida-
                                 tion, Disinfection
                       1,600   Coagulation, Sediment, Fil-
                                 tration, Disinfection
                                 (both sources)
                       1,800   Coagulation, Sediment, Fil-
                                 tration, Fluoridation,
                                 Disinfection
                       1,000   Coagulation, Sediment, Fil-
                                 tration, Fluoridation,
                                 Disinfection
                       2,800   Sedimentation, Fluoridation,
                                 Disinfection
Chem/Physical


Chem/Physical
                                                                              Chem/Physlcal


                                                                              Physical


                                                                              None
                                                 (continued)
-------
                                      TABLE  D-l.   (Continued)
Stnte
County
Community or
Are;1  Served
Retail Pop.  Treatment  Method(s)
                                                                                           Lab Tests
North       Burleigh     Bismarck
  Dakota
            McLean
            Carbon
             Garrison
Mercer
Mercer
Morton
Beulah
Hazen
Mandan
             Helper
                      35,000   Filtration,  Softening,  Taste    Chem/Bacterial
                                 and  Odor Control,  Iron  Re-
                                 moval  Fluoridation, Disin-
                                 fection

                       1,700   Aeration, Precipitation,  Fil-   None
                                 tration, Iron Removal,
                                 Fluoridation, Disinfection
                       1,344   Filtration,  Softening,  Fluori-  None
                                 dation, Disinfection

                       1,600   Filtration,  Iron Removal,       None
                                 Fluoridation, Disinfection

                      11,000   Aeration, Coagulation,  Sedi-    Chemical
                                 mentation, Filtration,
                                 Taste  & Odor, Iron Re-
                                 moval, Fluoridation,  Dis-
                                 infection

                       2,200   Fluoridation, Disinfection      None
                               Fluoridation, Disinfection
                               Disinfection
                                               (continued)
-------
                                      TABLE D-l.  (Continued)
Slate
County
               Community or
               Arej>  Served
Retnll Top.  Treatment  Method(s)
                                                                                           Lab Teats
            Carbon
             Price
                                     12,000  Coag.,  Sedimentation,  Fil-
                                               tration
                                             Disinfection
                                             Disinfection
                                             Disinfection

                                             Disinfection
                                                                                         None
            Carbon
            Emery
             Wellington
             lluntington
                                      1,050  Disinfection
                                      1,000  None  given
                                          None
                                          None
Wyoming
Campbell     Gillette
            Carbon
             Rawllns
                                                 10,000  Aeration,  Filtration,
                                                           Softening,  Taste and
                                                           Odor Control,  Iron Re-
                                                           moval, Disinfection
                                     10,000
                                                         Fluoridation,  Disinfection
                                                         Fluoridation,  Disinfection
                                                         Fluoridation,  Disinfection
                                                                             Chem/Physical
                                                                             Chem/Bact/Phys

                                                                             Cliem/Bact/Phys
                                                (continued)
-------
                                           TABLE  D-l.   (Continued)
     State
County
  Community or
  Area  Served
Retail Pop.  Treatment Method(s)
Lab Testa
      Utah
hO
CT>
Ul
                  Lincoln      Kemmerer
                  Slieridan     Sheridan
Emery
Perron
                                      3,000    Prechlorination, Coag., Sedi-
                                                 ment, Filtration, Taste &
                                                 Odor Control, Fluoridation,
                                                 Disinfection

                                      8,000    Prechlorination, Coag., Sedi-
                                                 mentation, Filtration,
                                                 Taste & Odor control,
                                                 Disinfection
                                                                                                 Chem/Bact/Phys
                                                                                                 Chem/Bact
   1,000    Coagulation, Sedimentation,     None
              Filtration, Disinfection
-------