WATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH SERIES • 15020DHB03/70
      STORAGE OF WASTES FROM WATERCRAFT
         AND DISPOSAL AT SHORE FACILITIES
   Vx
U.S. DEPARTMENT OP THE INTERIOR • FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION

-------
  STORAGE OF WASTES  FROM WATERCRAFT
    AND DISPOSAL AT SHORE FACILITIES
FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ADMINISTRATION
           DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                         by
                  GENERAL DYNAMICS
                     Electric Boat Division
                  Eastern Point Road, Grolon, Connecticut 06340
                   Program No. 15020DHB03/70
                     Contract No. 14-12-509

                       April 1970

-------
      FWPCA Review Notice

This report has been reviewed by the
Federal Water Pollution Control Admin-
istration and approved for publication.
Approval does not signify that the
contents necessarily reflect the views
and policies of the Federal Water Pol-
lution Control Administration.

-------
                                        ABSTRACT
This program was undertaken to establish the effectiveness and acceptability of a watercraft impoundment
system in controlling the principal waste sources, sanitary and galley waste, with disposal at a shore facility.
A demonstration unit was designed, built, and installed by Electric Boat on a commercial tugboat, and
operationally tested and evaluated under routine working conditions for a period of two months. Results of
the test data were analyzed, and component performance and system effectiveness were evaluated. Equip-
ment and installation costs, as well as system operating costs, were identified.

Sea water flushing was used for the water closets and urinal, but water conservation was used in the form
of specially designed sanitary flush control and galley sink volume control devices to allow the use of a
relatively small (120 gallon capacity) holding tank. The corrosion-resistant tank was provided with a level
sensing system, an odor controlled vent line, an automatic flushing system, and a high level alarm.
Shore-side transfer of the impounded wastes by suction pump-out of the tank via a quick-connect deck fitting
was demonstrated. Solid galley waste was stored in a specially designed trash compactor.

All components and subsystems performed effectively and reliably throughout the test phase. The system
was judged simple to operate and requires minimal operating attention and maintenance.

This report is submitted in fulfillment of Contract No. 14-12-509 between the Federal Water Pollution
Control Administration and General Dynamics' Electric Boat Division.
                                              iii

-------
                                      CONTENTS



SECTION                                TITLE                                      PAGE



                  Abstract                                                            iii




   1               Conclusions and Recommendations                                       1



                       Conclusions                                                      1



                       Recommendations for Future Action                                3





   2               Introduction                                                          5




   3               System Approach                                                     7



                       Overall System Description                                        7



                       Alternatives in System Approach Rejected                           10





   4               Subsystem and Component Design, Fabrication, and Installation             11



                       Impoundment Station                                            11



                       Impoundment Station Control System                              15



                       Sanitary Flush Control System      •                               25



                       Galley Waste Control                                            28



                       Pump-Out Station                                               30



                       Piping and Wiring Systems                                        33





   5               Operational Testing and Evaluation                                     37



                       Control System Adjustment and Calibration                         37



                       Operating Records and Test Equipment                             38



                       Equipment Performance Analysis                                  39



                       Normal System  Maintenance                                      42





   6               System Cost Summary                                                45



                       Initial Cost                                                     45



                       Operating Costs                                                45





   7               Acknowledgements                                                 .  49

-------
                                       FIGURES



FIGURE                                  TITLE                                         PAGE



   1              Watercraft Waste Impoundment System                                      8



   2              Waste Impoundment System — Overall Schematic                             9



   4              Waste Impoundment Tank - Assembly and Details                           12



   3              Waste Impoundment Tank - Installed                                     13/14



   5              Vent Filter                                                             15



   6              Watercraft Waste Piping and Control Schematic                             17/18



   7              Master Control Station - Front Panel                                      19



   8              Master Control Station - Inside Panel                                      19



   9              Alarm Station                                                           20



  10              Timing Diagram: Master Control Station, Alarm Station                       20



  11              Control System Circuit Diagram                                          21 /22



  12              Photohelic Switching Circuitry-Printed Circuit Board Etching                 23



  13              Tank Flush Control Valve                                                24



  14              Modified Flush Control Valve                                             26



  15              Sanitary Flush Control Station                                             27



  16              Trash Compactor                                                        29



  17              Trash Compactor - Assembly and Details                                  31/32



  18              Deck-Mounted Sewage Pump                                              33



  19              Cable Diagram                                                           35



  20              Water Closet and Urinal Event Timers                                       38



  21               Pump-out by Septic Tank Truck                                           43



  22              Pump Air Motor Accessories                                               44
                                           VI

-------
                                      TABLES



TABLE                                 TITLE                                       PAGE



   1              Sanitary Flush Control Times and Volumes                                37



   2              Results of Waste Volume Control Data                                    41



   3              Summary of Capital (Initial) Costs                                       46



   4              Tank Pump-out Alternatives                                            47
                                            vii

-------
                                         SECTION 1

                          CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS


                                        CONCLUSIONS

 The demonstration unit installed and operationally tested onboard the Three Deuces proved to be a
 practicable and acceptable system for the impoundment and shore-side transfer of sanitary and galley
 wastes. All components and subsystems performed effectively and reliably throughout the test phase.
 Specific conclusions regarding the system's relevant performance characteristics as well as its general
 acceptability and applicability are discussed below.

 Specific Performance Characteristics
 The sanitary and galley volume control devices increased the effective capacity of a relatively compact
 (nominal 120-gallon capacity) holding tank to an acceptable level.

 Electronically controlled sanitary flush control valves with provisions for a dual flush and subsequent valve
 deactivation (2 to 4 minutes) were used in conjunction with a self-closing galley sink faucet. These devices
 combined to reduce the total waste volume accumulation rate an estimated 50 percent to an observed 7.5
 gallons/man-day, under normal operating conditions. This rate is equivalent to an average pump-out
 interval of 3.0 days with a normal crew of five men. The operating data indicated that, if desired, the
 volume could most readily be reduced by replacing existing water closets with those of a more efficient
 design.

 Impoundment tank odor was controlled easily and satisfactorily by an activated carbon vent filter. The
 vent filter effectively controlled odor throughout the test period with an acceptable pressure drop
 (1/2 to 1 in. of water) during pump-out.

 The impoundment tank and the transfer lines can be automatically flushed in a relatively simple and
 reliable manner. A momentary tap of the reset pushbutton is all that is required to initiate each automatic
 flush during tank pump-out. The additional convenience and flexibility of a manual  override pushbutton,
 and permissive switches for simultaneous flushing of the drain lines along with the tank and transfer lines,
 were desirable features. The level sensing system, consisting of a bubble tube, a differential flow con-
 troller, and pressure gages, performed flawlessly under all operating conditions. A perforated pipe ring
 provided satisfactory flushing action.

 Storage of solid galley waste in the specially designed trash compactor was a satisfactory and practical
 means of increasing galley storage capacity.

 Test results showed that on the average, a two-week quantity of solid galley waste can be stored in the
 compactor before removing the compressed garbage in a plastic bag. Based on an observed compaction
 ratio of about 5:1, the amount stored is equivalent to approximately 14 cu ft of uncompacted galley
 waste. The unit can be operated with relative ease and safety.

 General Acceptability and Applicability
 The system is simple to operate and requires minimal operating attention and maintenance.

 The additional gage located in the galley was convenient for monitoring the tank level at  all times.
Acknowledgement of the high level alarm, and arming of the automatic flush control circuitry by pressing a
 pushbutton, prepare the impoundment tank for pump-out. Quick-connect fittings facilitate connection to
 and emptying of the tank by deck-mounted or shore-based facilities.

-------
 The air motor-driven pump mounted onboard the tugboat was controlled by a manually operated globe
 valve. In very cold weather, "icing" of the air motor muffler necessitated its removal during pump-out.
 Water must also be drained from the pump after each use during the winter months.

 The amount of routine maintenance required is minimal. Occasional inspection of the air line lubricators
 and air filters, together with changing of the pump gear oil and activated carbon about twice a year,
 comprise the normal maintenance schedule.

 Operating costs are normally quite low, assuming pump-out facilities have been made available by the owner
 or are available at nominal cost. The cost of sole reliance on a septic tank pumper for regular pump-out of the
 impoundment tank, however, is relatively high.

 The design approach is compatible with existing facilities in a large number of medium-sized commercial
 vessels used in coastal and harbor waters. Use of sea water flushing, dc power for control systems, cor-
 rosion resistant materials, and relatively small components, ensures widespread system applicability.
 Operation of the level sensing system, control valves, and sewage pump depends on the availability of
 compressed air. On most commercial vessels an air compressor is standard equipment; however, for those
 vessels without a compressed air supply, motor-operated or solenoid-operated control valves and a dc
 motor-driven pump could be substituted for their air-operated counterparts. In addition, an alternate
 level sensing concept would have to be used.

 The system is compatible with various shore-side storage and transfer facilities.

 Compatibility of the impoundment system with a septic tank pumper in terms of mating to the quick-
 connect deck fitting and efficient pumping out of the holding tank was successfully demonstrated. In the
 absence of suitable dockside facilities, transfer to a sewer system or package treatment plant was simulated
 by emptying the holding tank with a compact, inexpensive, air-motor driven diaphragm pump into a
 portable dockside storage tank. For purposes of this program, the pump was deck-mounted to anticipate
 emergencies while at sea or other ports where pump-out facilities are not available. Under normal operating
 conditions, a shore-based pump would have sufficed, based on an average observed pump-out interval of
 3 days. Occasional excursions to other ports, however, especially with an increased crew, might well
 require either more widespread pump-out facilities or further reductions in the tank volume accumulation
 rate before a deck-mounted pump could safely be eliminated as an integral part of the system, and a
 completely tamper-proof system achieved.

 The acceptability of transferring salt water flushed wastes from Navy barges into municipal sewers and
 treatment plants has been established for the City of Groton, Connecticut Al' The relative quantities of
 sea  water involved, according to Metcalf and Eddy, city consulting engineers, were considered negligible,
 and should have no detrimental effect. The holding tank capacity onboard the Three Deuces is less than
 one-tenth the size of the barge holding tanks referenced in the article.

 The initial cost of the demonstration unit installed on the Three Deuces tugboat, as anticipated, was
 moderately low.

The total installed cost of the prototype waste impoundment system as installed on the Three Deuces
tugboat amounted to $8,970. Approximately 65 percent of the total cost is attributable to the
impoundment and transfer functions, and the remaining 35 percent to the sanitary and galley waste
control systems. Cost reductions totaling $ 1,500 to $2,000 for large-scale production of components
such as the  impoundment tank and trash compactor are projected.
(1) The Day, New London, Conn., P 16, February 5,1970

-------
                                   RECOMMENDATIONS

Now that the feasibility and practicability of a waste impoundment system, such as that installed onboard
the Three Deuces tugboat, has been established, various means should be explored to improve its opera-
tional effectiveness and general acceptability. Recognizing that the limited availability of dockside storage
and transfer facilities is an obstacle to the widespread acceptance of any impoundment system, recommen-
dations are made below for increasing the effective tank storage capacity. The first recommendation pro-
poses a modification to the present installation. The second describes the merits of implementing a new
concept with potential advantages for cost as well as volume reductions.

1.   Replacement of existing water closets with those of more efficient design should be considered.

The effectiveness of the sanitary flush control system as currently conceived could be enhanced signifi-
cantly  by the use of more efficient water closets which require less water for flushing. Such water
closets are being introduced in this country and are designed for operation with only half as much
water as the standard water closet found on most commercial vessels. The desirability of following this
recommended course of action will depend upon:

     a.    The nature of the relative volume contributions for a specific vessel.
     b.    The additional cost of implementing such a modification as opposed to the alternate approach
           of increasing tank capacity through use of a more expensive form-fit receptacle.
     c.    The extent of the need for further reduction in the tank volume accumulation rates for a
           particular vessel.

2.   Use of a vacuum flush system for the transfer of sanitary wastes to an impoundment tank should be
     considered.

Further reductions in sanitary flush volumes can be achieved only by the use of a more efficient and
conceptually novel approach to waste transfer, such as the vacuum flush system. In a system of this type,
wastes are air-conveyed from specially designed water closets to a receiving tank by a vacuum pump with
the use of only 1/2 gallon of water per flush. Use of such a vacuum flush system could reduce the total
volume accumulation rate observed in this program from  7.5 to approximately 3.5 gallons per man-day.

A substantial fraction of the total system cost is associated with the procurement and installation of the
various piping systems. Hence, the use of 2-in. lines under 15-in. Hg vacuum, as opposed to 3-in. gravity
drain lines, could result in substantial cost savings. The savings are the result of the (a) reduced cost per
foot of drain line, (b) relative ease of installation without the restriction of allowing for gravity drainage,
and (c) elimination of the need for relocating or modifying existing structures or equipment.

An accurate assessment of the initial and operating costs associated with incorporating a vacuum flush
system can only be obtained by designing, installing, and  testing this type of impoundment system under
actual  operating conditions. Only then can a realistic appraisal be made in terms of cost, effectiveness,
and acceptability.

Finally, it is recommended that replacement of the specially designed trash compactor by a mass-
produced, electrically operated unit be considered if and when such units become available for domestic
consumption. A unit of this type, developed by one of the major appliance manufacturers, is currently
being test marketed, and should prove attractive in terms of reduced initial cost as well as increased
operating convenience. The manufacturer claims the appliance will be able to compact a week's worth of
garbage for an average family in a polyethylene lined bag, with a compaction ratio of 4.5:1.

-------
                                         SECTION 2
                                      INTRODUCTION

For most commercial and recreational watercraft, the use of an impoundment system with disposal at a
shore facility portends the highest probability of success in controlling the principal waste sources cited
below. The approach is relatively simple, reliable, and well within the state of the art. In addition, the
method is compatible with existing facilities in most commercial watercraft and with presently foreseeable
methods for disposal of waste at shore facilities. Since there is no effluent, the system conforms to state
regulatory legislation.

The goal of this program has been to demonstrate the practicability and acceptability of this approach by
developing a waste storage/disposal system based on the following criteria:

      a.    Moderately low initial cost (equipment plus installation costs).
      b.    Minimal operating attention and maintenance.
      c.    Tamper-proof, i.e., not easily bypassed.
      d.    Simple to use and psychologically acceptable.
      e.    Components small enough to fit through hatchways and doors.
      f.    Odor-free,
      g.    Design approach applicable to a large number of watercraft.
      h.    Compatible with various shore disposal techniques.

Such a waste impoundment system has been designed, built, and installed by Electric Boat division on a
commercial tugboat (the Three Deuces) to serve as a demonstration unit. The Three Deuces, built in 1944
for the Navy, is 115 feet long, 28 feet wide, and 15 feet deep (draft). It is powered by two 600-horsepower
diesel engines, and is currently used for coastal and harbor towing. The waste impoundment system has
been operationally tested and evaluated, while in use by the crew under routine working conditions, for
a period of two months.

Of specific interest in this program were the sanitary (urine and feces) and galley wastes generated onboard
ship. Both forms of waste are significant sources of pollution in terms of:

      a.    The oxygen demand of organic matter.
      b.    The quantity of suspended matter.
      c.    Pathogenic organisms.

The content of organic matter insidiously influences the dissolved oxygen content of waters receiving the
waste, while the discharge of large amounts of suspended matter produces pollution obvious even to the
casual observer. The potential health hazard (as indicated by coliform index) is, of course, extremely
important.

-------
                                         SECTION 3

                                    SYSTEM APPROACH


                             OVERALL SYSTEM DESCRIPTION

The current shipboard practice of "over the side" waste disposal incorporated in present ship designs uses
sea water flushing of the sanitary facilities into gravity drain lines. Similar gravity drainage is used for
galley waste, with all such drain lines terminating in discharge ports at or near the  waterline. The modi-
fications required to provide for the temporary storage and subsequent shore transfer of sanitary and
galley waste onboard the Three Deuces are reflected in Figure 1. This spatially oriented sketch shows the
approximate location of the various components specifically  designed to accomplish these modifications.
Figure 2 presents the system in schematic form, and shows functional interrelationships more clearly and
the degree of support provided by ship's services. For purposes of exposition, the total system can be
separated into the major subsystems described below.

Impoundment Station
The overboard discharge ports are sealed and the waste lines redirected via gravity drain to a nominal
120-gallon holding tank located in a corner of the engine room. The coated steel tank is fitted with
a 3-in. suction  line, a level sensing system (bubble tube), an odor controlled (carbon filter) vent line, and
a flush manifold. In addition, a high level alarm station and access and viewports are provided. An im-
poundment tank of this size will be  sufficient for a minimum storage period of 2 days with a five-man
crew (assuming 24 hr/day occupancy). These figures are based on incorporation of the specific volume
control components described below.

Tank Flush Control System
An electronically controlled system (master control station) for the automatic flushing and cleaning of the
impoundment tank, suction line, and transfer hose with a controlled quantity of sea water  is incorporated
in the impoundment system. Toward the end of tank pump-out, a low level sensor switches on a solenoid
valve in the sea water flush line and admits sea water to the flush manifold for a preset time period. The
sea water flush may be repeated as often as desired.

Sanitary Flush Control System

To provide a reasonable pump-out interval (more than 2 days) in conjunction with a relatively compact
holding tank, a unique electronically controlled flush system was developed which minimizes the volume
of sanitary waste. A solenoid-actuated volume control valve was installed in the  existing sea water flush
lines for each facility. These control valves, operated by single pushbuttons via the flush station timing
and control circuitry, provide a dual flush consistent with the minimum and maximum requirements
anticipated. The minimum and maximum flush volumes can be varied to suit the needs of each facility.
Immediately after a flush, the corresponding valve is rendered inactive for a predetermined time period
(adjustable from 0 to 5 minutes). These volume control measures are designed to produce an effective
reduction in flush volume of approximately 60 to 65 percent when used with existing fixtures.

Galley Waste Control
Suitable galley sink hardware was installed to minimize waste water volume.  Examination of the habits
of the crew with respect to galley sink usage led to the selection of a self-closing valve, in conjunction
with a single handle mixing valve, as the most efficient installation.

In addition, a specially designed trash  compactor was built to facilitate storage of solid galley waste prior
to shore-side disposal. The all-aluminum unit is manually operated, and can be safely handled by one man.

-------
                          SEPTIC TANK TRUCK
00
VENT FILTER
    /      MASTER CONTROL
        -"~">,STATION
                                                                             TJWK CONTROL VALVE

                                                                                       SV/ TLUSH
                                                                           \

                                                                     Figure 1. Waterfcraft Waste Impoundment System

-------
                                           SYMBOL   LIST
-{>1-j-i MIXING VALVE

  @  FLOW iHOlCATOR
                                  FILTER
                                 SUCTION PUMP
                                                           WATER CLOSET
                                                       (UR) URINAL

                                                           I "tan BUTTON. DUAL
                                                                                                NOTES
                                                                                    1. THE  CAK&on farf^  BUBBLE  TUBE  f.
                                                                                     PLUSH nine ARE TO ee Renoi/ABie
                                                                                     FOR  CLEAN I H
-------
Pump-out Station
The sanitary and galley waste stored in the impoundment tank is transferred by pumping out the tank via
a quick-connect fitting mounted on the deck. A septic tank truck can normally be used to empty the im-
poundment tank by coupling its 100 to 150 feet of suction hose to the deck fitting. To demonstrate
alternate disposal methods, a deck-mounted sewage pump with suitable suction and discharge hoses was
provided. In this way, disposal into a dock-side treatment plant can also be demonstrated. In emergencies,
or when the boat is at sea, overboard discharge is possible.


                    ALTERNATIVES TO SYSTEM APPROACH REJECTED

Alternate Flush Modes
Use of potable water, instead of sea water, for all flushing purposes was considered. Sea water flushing was
selected because of the additional cost of modifying existing sea water flush facilities to use a fresh water
flush, and the unlimited supply of sea water available to all boats.

Another alternative considered was the storage of used wash water and the reuse of this water for facility
flushing. While this system does offer the advantage of impounding waste wash waters as well as sanitary
and galley wastes at no increase in the  size of the holding  tank, a pump and connecting plumbing would be
required. Hence, because of the increased cost and complexity of the system, this approach was not used.

Use of Compressed Air for Blow Discharge
Use of the ship's compressed air system to discharge (by displacement) the waste from the impoundment
vessel was considered and rejected. This method does have the advantage of not requiring a pump or other
auxiliary facility for waste discharge; iiowever, it suffers from several disadvantages. The waste impound-
ment tank, connections, discharge fittings, and hose would be under internal pressures greater than 30 psig.
To ensure both structural integrity and airt'ght seals and connections, fabrication costs of the tank would
necessarily be higher than with a suction pump-out. The results of an improper connection or damaged hose
would be much more unpleasant.

Additional control valves and a more complicated control system would have to be installed. Furthermore,
the simple and reliable bubble tube concept used for level sensing would have to be modified or
supplemented for use during tank discharge.

Finally, over-the-side disposal could be accomplished too  easily.
                                             10

-------
                                         SECTION 4


                              SUBSYSTEM AND COMPONENT

                       DESIGN. FABRICATION. AND INSTALLATION


                                 IMPOUNDMENT STATION

Waste Impoundment Tank
A 120-gallon nominal capacity waste impoundment tank was built by Electric Boat division and installed
on the Three Deuces tugboat. It was designed for the collection, temporary storage, and subsequent dis-
charge of sanitary and galley wastes in a saline medium. Provisions were made for level sensing, and auto-
matic flushing of the tank through a flush manifold. The tank was also equipped with an odor-controlled
vent line. Details concerning these provisions are discussed below.

Figure 3 shows the detailed design of the waste impoundment tank. It has been rolled, using 3/16-in. mild
steel, into a cylindrical configuration measuring 24 in. in diameter and 66 in. high. These dimensions were
limited by the size of the boat's passageways and the available overhead space, respectively. A 1/2-in. steel
head plate was welded to the upper end of the tank and fitted with silver brazed bronze couplings for
the 1-in. vent line, 3/4-in. flush line, 1/4-in. air line, and the 3-in. drain and discharge lines. A 3-in.
copper-nickel discharge pipe, located in the center of the tank, extended to within 2-1/2 in. of the bottom
with a slight flare at the end. Since the suction line is an integral part of the impoundment tank, 3-in.
pipe was used to virtually preclude any possibility of clogging during pump-out. A dished bottom was
used to provide for a more efficient and thorough pump-out.

A 1/4-in. copper-nickel "bubble" tube, held alongside the discharge pipe by a guide ring near the bottom,
forms part of the level sensing system by operating as a hydrostatic pressure probe. Approximately 2 in.
below the top of the tank is a 20-in. diameter perforated pipe ring which functions as a flush manifold.
Both the flush ring and bubble tube are removable through an access cover located near the top of the
tank. The access hatch also permits coating of the internal surfaces after the tank head has been welded
in place. The hatch has a flat, rather than contoured, cover to help ensure an airtight seal.  A Plexiglas*
viewport in the tank cover plate allows observation and sampling.

A two-coat (16 mils thick) application of PitchenTarset* was applied to all internal surfaces before in-
stallation with the exception of internal pipe unions and open couplings. This substance is a standard
corrosion resistant coating normally applied to submarine sanitary tanks. A pre-installation air-leak test
was also performed. An air pressure of 20 psig was applied and held for 15 minutes. No leakage  or loss of
pressure was observed.

To provide sufficient overhead space as well as adequate structural support, the impoundment tank was
installed to rest on a steel support cradle approximately 1 -1/2 feet below the engine room deck  (see
Figure 4). A steel belly band, secured to the hull, provide lateral stability.

Flush Manifold
The finalized design of the flush manifold appears in Figure 3. Based on a laboratory evaluation of various
configurations, a perforated pipe ring was judged best able to provide a uniform and thorough flushing of
the tank's interior surfaces. A perforation pattern of 1/16-in. holes on 2-in.  centers angled 55 degrees
upward was found to provide the most effective flushing action. Additional holes were provided to ensure
adequate flushing of the access hatch, bubble tube, and discharge pipe. Under a pump pressure of 30 psig,
the flush manifold can deliver 15 gpm of sea water at linear velocities of 25 fps.

'Mention of commercial products does not imply endorsement by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.
                                              11

-------
                         Figure 4. Waste Impoundment Tank-Installed

The 20-in. diameter flush ring consists of two 1/2-in. copper-nickel semicircular pipe sections which were
coupled inside the tank by two bronze unions. A bronze tee, silver brazed into one of the sections, con-
nects to the 3/4-in. sea water flush line through a bronze union. This fluid connection, together with a
clamp fastened to the cover plate, puts the flush ring in the desired position.

Vent Filter
An activated carbon vent filter was provided for effective odor control of the 1-in. tank vent line. The
funnel-shaped filter was constructed of 16 gage monel with a monel weather hood bolted to four equally
spaced brackets (see Figure 5). A cloth bag filled with 5.2 Ib of unimpregnated, technical grade, activated
charcoal, MIL-C-17605 BuShips, simply rests inside the filter and is easily replaced. This type of activated
charcoal has been used successfully by Electric Boat division for odor control of submarine sanitary tanks.

An important consideration in the design of the vent filter is the maximum pressure drop anticipated during
either inflow or pump-out. If an excessive pressure drop occurs during inflow of sanitary or galley waste,
when the tank level is nearing its allowable limit, the high level alarm system could be prematurely
activated. Excessive pressure surges during pump-out could result in partial or complete removal of the
                                               12

-------
 PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
                           /
                          A
                                                                  16 GAGE MONEL SHEET
                                                         2-IN. CU-NI PIPE
                                    Figure 5. Vent Filter

sanitary facility and galley sink water traps. Accordingly, the filter size and configuration were selected
so as to limit the pressure drop to 0.6 in. of water for air flow rates up to 10 cfm. If necessary, the
pressure through the carbon bed can be decreased significantly by inserting a suitable support at any
desired level.

The vent filter is coupled, through a 2-in. bronze union and reducer, to the 1-in. vent line about 10 feet
above the deck, and is readily accessible from the top of the deck house.'


                       IMPOUNDMENT STATION CONTROL SYSTEM

A sophisticated and versatile electronic monitoring and control system was developed to provide:

      a.    Continuous monitoring of the liquid level inside the waste impoundment tank.
      b.    Controlled automatic flushing of the impoundment tank during pump-out.
      c.    High level alarm (audible and visual) and overflow protection.

Figure 6 presents in schematic form the interactions of the primary components and subsystems which
comprise the sanitary and tank flush control systems. Those items associated with the impoundment
station are the level sensing system components, master control station, solenoid flush valve, and the
alarm station. The precise nature of their operation, and a detailed description of the control system
circuitry and logic, are presented in the following paragraphs.
                                             15

-------
Level Sensing System
The liquid level inside the waste impoundment tank is continuously monitored by means of a level sensing
system based on the use of a hydrostatic pressure probe commonly referred to as a bubble tube. A bubble
tube is a simple and reliable device for balancing air pressure against head of liquid in a vessel for remote
level sensing (see Figure 3).

This system uses the ship's air compressor as a source of pressurized air. The compressed air is first passed
through a filter and then through a differential flow controller (adjustable from 0 to 2.5 cfh) before
entering the bubble tube. The flow controller maintains a constant flow of air through the bubble tube
which is independent of changes in upstream and downstream pressure. The controlled single bubble
formation at the bottom of the tube ensures equivalence of air pressure in the tube and head of liquid in
the tank. The back pressure in the bubble tube is sensed and indicated at two places: a magnehelic gage
mounted in the alarm station, and a photohelic pressure switch/gage mounted in the master control station.

Master Control Station and Alarm Station
The master control station, mounted on the after, port side of the deck house, is the operator's control
station for flushing of the impoundment tank. This station houses the timing circuit for the impoundment
tank flush valve, printed circuit board for low level control and high level alarm, photohelic gage, and
switching for the selection of either or all of the sanitary flush valves to operate in unison with the tank
flush valve. The power supply for the photohelic indicator relay is located in a separate enclosure to
preclude excessive heat buildup within the master control station.

The physical layout of the master control station is shown in Figures 7 and 8. Manual controls include:

      a.    Manual override pushbutton located underneath chassis.
      b.    Reset pushbutton located on cover.
      c.    High and low set point indices located on the photohelic gage.
      d.    Permissive switches for allowing each flush station valve  to operate in unison with the holding
           tank flush valve.
      e.    Time duration of holding tank flush valve, adjustable from 3 to 300 seconds.

The high level alarm station mounted above the galley sink houses a  bell, acknowledge pushbutton, high
level red light, alarm relay, and tank level indicator (see Figure 9).

The operation of both the master control station and the alarm station is best illustrated by means of a
timing diagram (see Figure 10) showing the sequential operation of the various control station elements
in each operational mode. The circuitry that was developed to accomplish each operation and the
corresponding terminal board connections are to be found in Figure  11. The printed circuit board which
contains the photocell switching circuitry is shown in Figure 12. Operation of the system requires that
all ship's services be available and energized, e.g., 120(±10 percent) volts dc, 100 psi air, and 30 (±5) psi
salt water.

Over the normal operating range, i.e., between the low and high level set points, the photohelic gage's
photocell beam is on and the resistance of the photocell resistors (PSC LL/PSC HL) is low. When the tank
level indicator exceeds the high level set point, the photobeam is cut off and the PSC HL resistance
suddenly increases. The resultant shift in circuit voltages triggers the high level relay, CR 2, and sounds
the alarm bell. Pushing the acknowledge button silences the alarm and energizes the red light on the cover.
The red light remains energized by an alarm relay until the level in the holding tank is reduced below the
high level set point.
                                            16

-------
 PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
Figure 7. Master Control Station - Front Panel
                                        ••P
                               EL INDICATOR
                      (WIWHIGH & LOW
                                                    PERMISSIVE
                                                    SWITCHES
Figure 8. Master Control Station — Inside Panel
                      19

-------
                    Figure 9. Alarm Station
 LL -
                 (BEU
               HIJACK.     ' H
                 (LAMP   ; i-
                                 PERMISSIVE SWITCH  H
       RESET   M
       MANUAL     H
       FLUSH       H

    UMBER     i—i
LAMP OFF'	;	'
    (RED
 I !67Mltj  ^MIM'

        I  i
-»       ,  H
                           PUMP h
                                             8MIN
 Figure 10. Timing Diagram: Master Control Station, Alarm Station
                               20

-------
 PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
              Figure 12. Photohelic Switching Circuitry - Printed Circuit Board Etching

The high level relay, CR 2, is also used to interrupt power to a motor contactor holding coil. This holding
coil controls the ship's salt water flush pump which supplies the 30 psi pressure for flushing. This circuit
is a safety feature designed to prevent the pump from causing an overflow if a component malfunctions.
Under normal conditions, the next step in the sequence of operations is to push the reset button and pump
out the tank. Pushing the reset button energizes the arming relay which, in turn, energizes an amber light.
When the tank level indicator crosses the low level set point, the low level relay, CR 1, is energized, causing
the arming relay to drop out and a timed flush (adjustable from 3 to 300 seconds) to start. At this time
the amber light is de-energized and a red light comes on for the duration of the flush. At the end of the
timing interval, the arming relay is de-energized and the signal to the flush control valve interrupted. The
flush valve will not operate again until the reset button is  depressed and the tank level  indicator falls below
the low level set point.

The system can be de-armed at any time by a momentary tap of the manual override pushbutton. In
addition, the manual override will cause the tank flush valve to open for as long as the button  is held in.

Activation of any or all of the permissive switches transfers control from the sanitary flush control system
to the master control station, and permits a simultaneous flush of the tank and each sanitary facility and
drain line.

Impoundment Tank Flush control Valve
A solenoid-energized pneumatic-actuated ball valve was selected as the tank flush control valve on the
basis of minimum cost and maximum reliability and flexibility. The control valve assembly chosen consists
                                               23

-------
 of three separate units (see Figure 13):

      a.    Jamesbury 3/4-in. "double seal" bronze ball valve, type A 11-7ITT, with monel trim and
            Teflon seat*.

      b.    Jamesbury pneumatic operator, type ST-10*.

      c.    ASCO four-way solenoid pilot valve, type 8345A5*.
                              Figure 13. Tank Flush Control Valve

These items can be either supplied as integral units or purchased separately for field installation. The valve
sizing coefficient, Cv, is 14. Hence the pressure drop through the valve during the automatic tank flush
(15 gpm) is only about 1 psi. The pneumatic operator will actuate the 3/4-in. ball valve with a minimum
supply pressure of 60 psi.

The solenoid pilot valve is furnished as fail-safe closed. Although the ST-10 pneumatic operator is a
double-acting unit, the probability of air pressure failing with the valve in the open position is extremely
remote.

•Mention of commercial products does not imply endorsement by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.
                                                24

-------
Component Specifications for Impoundment Station Control System
QTY
                  DESCRIPTION
     SOURCE*
   1
   1
   1
   2
   3
   3
   1
   2
Air Filter, 1/4 in., Type 2306
Air Line Lubricator, 1/4 in., No. 4102
Constant Differential Relay with Rotameter, Type 62 VA
Magnehelic Pressure Gage, Model 2069
Photohelic Pressure Gage/Switch, Model 3060-LRT (OEM)
Panel Enclosure, 16 x 12 x 6 in., No. A-16H12A, NEMA 4,
with 13 x7-in. Panel
Panel Enclosure, 12 x 10 x 6 in., No. A-12N106, NEMA 1,
with 101/4x8 1/4-in. Panel
Time Delay Relay, Type 428-3-D-7,3-300 sec.
Zener Diode, Type 1N4729A, 3.3 v, Low, 5%
Zener Diode, Type 1N2989,30 v
Zener Diode, Type LVA56A, 5.6 v
Momentary Contact Pushbutton Switch, Flush Head Type
110 VDC Relay, Type KHP17D11,4 PDT
Adaptabell, 125 VDC, No. 343-4
24 VDC Relay, Type KHP17D11,4 PDT
Moore Products Co.
Kennett Corp.
Moore Products Co.
Dwyer Mfg. Co.
Dwyer Mfg. Co.
Tower-Olschan Electric
Supply Co.
Tower-Olschan Electric
Supply Co.
Artisan Electronics
Motorola
Motorola
Thomas Ramo Wooldridge
United Electric Supply Co.
Potter & Brumfield
Edwards Co.
Potter & Brumfield
                          SANITARY FLUSH CONTROL SYSTEM
A flush control system was developed which reduces both the volume and frequency of urinal and water
closet flushing. It is designed for use with existing salt water flushing facilities, and requires only the
replacement of existing flush valves with appropriate volume control valves to:

     a.    Provide a dual flush capability for each water closet consistent with the needs of the
           operator.                   *
     b.    Render each flush valve inactive for a period of several minutes immediately after its use.
Preliminary, pre-installation testing indicated the following quantities to be adequate for satisfactory
flushing:
      a.    Urinal - 1 pint to 1 quart per flush.
      b.    Water Closet - 2 gallons per flush for urine
                         4 gallons per flush for feces.

The actual flush quantities required for each facility were determined during flush valve calibration, and
are presented in Table 1 of Section 5.
Volume Control Valves
The results of an investigation of commercially available, manually operated flush valves indicated the
necessity of using remotely controlled valve operators to perform the aforementioned functions. Motor-
operated Sloan* naval flush valves were considered for the job, but were not used because:
"Mention of commercial products does not imply endorsement by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.
                                             25

-------
      a.    Motor operators are supplied with ac motors only, whereas dc power only is available onboard
           the tugboat. Hence, a dc/ac converter would be required.
      b.    Minimum flush volumes exceed that desired for uririal flushing.
      c.    Two flush valves, with two separate pushbutton stations, would be required for each water
           closet, resulting in an increase in control system cost and complexity. In addition, the
           "short flush" pushbutton could be bypassed too easily.

In the absence of any completely satisfactory commercially available flush valve, the Jamesbury solenoid-
energized, pneumatic-actuated control valve described in the preceding subsection was selected. Two
3/4-in. valves were chosen to service the  two water closets, and one 1/2-in. valve for the urinal. These
valves possess the following advantages:

      a.    A single control valve, in conjunction with a single pushbutton, to effect a dual flush
           operation. (The use of a single pushbutton is advantageous for minimizing indiscriminate use
           of the "long" flush.)
      b.    Compatibility with onboard dc power supply.
      c.    Flexibility of flush volume delivery in terms of meeting the needs of a specific fixture (urinal
           or water closet), the operator, or the system as a whole (unison flush).

Since the selected valve is air-operated, it can readily be adapted to provide for both adequate flushing
action during siphoning and proper filling of the water trap. The corresponding modifications are
illustrated in  Figure 14. In the appropriate air line connection between the pilot solenoid and valve
operator, a needle valve and ball check valve have been inserted in parallel. When the solenoid is energized,
air flow is unimpeded through the check valve, and the ball valve opens instantaneously. When  the solenoid
is de-energized, the exhausted air (100 psi) is forced to go through an adjustable restriction, and a delayed
closing action occurs. For reasons of esthetics, space limitations, and ease of installation, all three valves
were installed beneath the main deck in  the engine room overhead space.
                            Figure 14. Modified Flush Control Valve
                                               26

-------
Flush Control Station
The flush station houses the relays, timers, and jumpers required for the timing circuitry associated with
each of the three flush valves. It was mounted in a centralized, easily accessible location alongside the
engine room stairway. The physical arrangement of the flush control timers can be seen in Figure 15.
                                                             FLUSH  TIMER

                                                     I
                                   LONG FLUSH TIMERS
                            Figure 15. Sanitary Flush Control Station

The timing circuitry is identical for all three flush valves (see Figure 11), Each flush station circuit consists
of three timers and an arming relay. The three timers are required to give:

      a.    An initial (short) flush time, variable from 0.5 to  10 seconds, for a momentary closure of the
           pushbutton.
      b.    A secondary flush time, variable from 0.5 to 10 seconds, for as long as the pushbutton is held
           closed. Hence the combined (long) flush time can vary from 1.0 to 20 seconds.
      c.    A flush valve de-activation time, variable from 3.0 to 300 seconds, for a length of time
           determined by the setting of the third timer.

The only other time these valves can be energized would be through the master control station with the
permissive switch in the ON  position.

The dual flush and de-activation capability described above is effected as follows:
                                          27

-------
 Case 1. A momentary closure of the pushbutton energizes relay CRIA which maintains circuit closure by
 holding contacts CRIA 5 through 9 closed, and also arms relay contacts at timer TA2A. This action, in turn,
 energizes an internal relay which sequentially arms relay contacts associated with timers TD3A and TD4A.
 The arming of timer TD4A opens contacts 1 through 4, thereby de-energizing relay CRIA and initiating
 time delay on dropout of timer TD2A. During this time period (0.5 to 10 sec), the flush control valve
 pilot solenoid is energized until TD2A times out.

 Case 2. Upon de-energizing of the TD2A timing circuitry, the TD3A arming relay is de-activated and the
 second timer is set into motion (0.5 to  10 sec). During this time period, energizing of the valve solenoid
 can occur only by sustained closure of the pushbutton.

 Case 3. When TD3A times out, timer TD4A is activated (3 to 300 sec). The pushbutton is now incapable
 of energizing the control valve solenoid as all of the corresponding circuit contacts are open. When TD4A
 de-energizes, the arming circuitry returns to normal, and the timing circuit is capable of initiating another
 controlled flush.

 Component Specifications for Sanitary Flush Control System

 QTY                              DESCRIPTION                            SOURCE*

    1             Enclosure, No. A12N106 NEMA 112x10x6 in., with      Tower-Olschan Electric
                 10 1/4 x 8 1/4-in. Panel                                  Supply Co.
   6             Time Delay Relay, Type 428xD7S, 0.1 to 10 sec.            Artisan Electronics
   3             Time Delay Relay, Type 4283D7,3 to 300 sec.              Artisan Electronics
   3             Momentary Contact Pushbutton Switch, Flush Head,         United Electric Supply Co
                 Type 3NO-3NC
   3             110  VDC Relay, Type KHP 17D11.4PDT                  Potter ABromfield
   2             Hoke Bell Check Valves, 1/4 in. NPT, Type 6113F4B         J.Bertram Co.
   2             Hoke Needle Valves, 1/4 in. NPT, Type 2RBZ81-10          J. Bertram Co.


                                GALLEY WASTE CONTROL

Solid Waste Compactor
An all-aluminum trash compactor (see Figure 16) was provided to reduce solid galley waste storage
requirements  so as to facilitate shore-side disposal and thereby minimize the incidence of over-the-side
dumping. The design of the compactor is based on manual operation of a modified, ratchet-type auto
jack rated at 4,000 Ib capacity. The jack provides sufficient pressure to an attached bearing plate to
effect a 5:1 reduction in volume of typical galley waste.

Figure 17  is an assembly and detail drawing of the trash compactor as fabricated for the Three Deuces. A
standard 2-ton Sears Roebuck auto jack* with 0 to 31-in. lift, was adapted as shown in the drawing. The
normally fixed portion is clamped in place by two aluminum caps to the top of the inner cylinder. The
bottom of the jack stem is pinned and leaded in place to a 1-1/8 in. aluminum compressor plate which
travels up  and down inside the cylinder assembly. The cylinder assembly rests inside an outer can, with a
disposable plastic bag separating the two cylinders. The outer can is designed to hold up to 3 fr of
compacted garbage. Four camloc latches, rated at 1500 Ib each, hold the cylinder to the can as pressure
is applied downward through the jack bearing plate to the solid waste.

The trash compactor is installed in a storage closet adjacent to the after end of the galley. To permit one
man to handle the unit safety, a counterweight, attached to the jack stem via two pulleys and cables, was
provided.
 •Mention of commercial products does not imply endorsement by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.
                                            28

-------

                                  Figure 16. Trash Compactor
 Operating Procedure
 !     With cylinder assembly elevated and clear of the trash can, slip plastic bag with circular cardboard
 I

5.

6.

7.
                                                   —-j «"»£* f*»• raw WU£ TT11J1 1>11VLJJU1 1/Ul U UUal U
 insert at bottom onto cylinder. Secure latches in the up position with the aid of the button magnets
 provided.
 Lower cylinder into outer can and fasten latches to strikes on can.
 Elevate bearing plate to its topmost position and secure jack stem with locking pin. Engage ratchet
 by placing rod in horizontal position.
 When trash can is full, close door, remove locking pin, and begin downward jacking action. Continue
 compaction until limiting pressure is reached.
 Disengage ratchet mechanism, and back off several notches on jack stem, if necessary. Raise bearing
 plate to its topmost position, secure with locking pin, and engage ratchet.
 Repeat steps 4 and 5 as required until trash can is filled with compacted  waste. If desired, a hquid
 spray disinfectant may be applied to the galley waste prior to compaction.
Unlatch cylinder assembly and remove locking pin. Extract cylinder by downward jacking action as
far as possible, before completely  removing it from trash can. Remove plastic bag and seal open end
prior to dockside disposal.
                                             29

-------
Galley Sink Faucet Control
To minimize water usage in the galley, the original faucet was replaced by a single lever faucet with a hose
and spray attachment. The swinging spout was sealed so that the faucet could be operated through the
self-closing spray attachment only, thereby eliminating unnecessary water usage. Additional water savings
accrue from the somewhat reduced flow rate (1.5 to 2.0 gpm), and the convenience of a single handle
mixing valve.


                                    PUMP-OUT STATION

The waste impoundment tank is designed for suction pump-out by either a shore-based (septic tank service
truck, etc.) or deck-mounted pumping station. The 3-in, Cu-Ni suction pipe in the center of the tank
extends upward through the deck and terminates in a 3-in. male Ever-tite* bronze quick-connect fitting.
The sanitary and galley waste stored in the impoundment tank can then be transferred through a suitable
suction hose coupled to the deck fitting.

Septic Tank Service Truck
In the absence of a fixed shore-based facility, a mobile pumping station in the form of a septic tank service
truck can be used. These tank trucks are generally equipped with 100 to 150 feet of suction hose, compatible
(Ever-tite) quick-connect couplings, and have more than adequate self-priming and suction lift capabilities.

Deck-Mounted Sewage Pump
To demonstrate alternate waste disposal methods, a deck-mounted sewage pump was provided, together
with suitable suction and discharge hoses. In this way disposal into a dockside sewer or treatment plant
could be demonstrated. In emergencies, or when the boat is at sea, overboard discharge is possible. For
future incorporation into a completely tamperproof impoundment system, the same sewage pump can be
operated with equal effectiveness as part of a portable shore-side pumping station. Because of the develop-
mental nature of this installation, in terms of its ability to provide an adequate pump-out interval under all
operating conditions, deck-mounting of the pump seemed appropriate.

Selection of a suitable sewage pump was based on its ability to meet the following requirements:

      a.    Capable of pumping out raw sanitary and galley waste immersed in sea water, via a 3-in.
           suction pipe, at a rate not less than 15 gpm. Maximum size solids to be encountered = 1-1/4 in.
      b.    Suction lift greater than or equal to 15 feet of water.
      c.    Discharge head greater than or equal to 10 feet of water.
      d.    Self-priming under the above conditions.
      e.    Compatible with sea water.
      f.    Capable of unrestricted operation in marine atmosphere.

      g.    Compatible with onboard power supply.
      h.    Relatively small, lightweight, and inexpensive.

A suitable pump, in terms of its ability to satisfy all the above criteria, is a Marlow Model 204 EC "Mud Hog" *
2 x 2-in. single diaphragm pump. Under the maximum suction and discharge pressures listed, this pump can
provide a nominal flow rate of 20 gpm, and is  capable of self-priming to a static suction lift of 20 feet of
water. The pump diaphragm is made of nylon  inserted natural rubber; replaceable rubber flapper valves are
used for the inlet and outlet check valves. Since the gearcase and pump body were of cast iron construction,
the vendor coated all parts in contact with the liquid to be pumped with an 18-mil. thick Scotchcoat #202
Epoxy* coating prior to assembly.

•Mention of commercial products does not imply endorsement by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.
                                            30

-------
 PAGE NOT
AVAILABLE
DIGITALLY

-------
Primarily because of the long delivery times (3 to 4 months) associated with marine dc motors, an equiv-
alent air motor was chosen to drive the pump. In accordance with the pump manufacturer's recommen-
dations, a Cast Model 2 AM-NCC-43 rotary air motor with NEMA 56C flange mounting was specified. The
unit is rated at 1/2 hp at 1750 rpm, and requires 17 cfm of "free air" consumption at 70 psig. This re-
quirement is well within the capability of the ship's air compressor, which can deliver 25 cfm at 100 psig.
The air motor was supplied with the manufacturer's recommended accessories consisting of a 2F122B
filter; manual drain, 1/4 in.; a 2ROOOAG regulator, 1/4 in. with AA806 gage; and a 2LOOO lubricator,
1/4 in. Use of an air motor vs an equivalent dc motor has the additional benefits of greater compactness
and lower cost*

Installation of the air motor-driven diaphragm pump is shown in Figure 18. It is a relatively compact unit
requiring a volume envelope of approximately 15 x 19 x 16 in. It is shown connected to the deck pump-out
fitting via a short length of flexible, reinforced-rubber suction hose fitted with Ever-tite bronze quick-
connect couplings. The air motor ancillaries, including a 1-in. bronze control valve, are located alongside
the pump.


                              PIPING AND WIRING SYSTEMS

All the required piping and wiring systems associated with the interconnection of the primary system
components and their connection to the appropriate ship's services are illustrated in Figures 1, 2, and  6.
A brief description of the pertinent characteristics of each system is presented in the following paragraphs.
                                                            AIR MOTOR
                            DRAJN V.1




                            \
                           Figure 18. Deck-Mounted Sewage Pump
•Mention of commercial products does not imply endorsement by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration.
                                            33

-------
Piping Systems

Unless otherwise specified, 70-30 Cu-Ni piping and bronze fittings and valves were used throughout to
provide the necessary protection against salt water corrosion. All Cu-Ni piping to fitting joints was
silver brazed. Flange gaskets made from neoprene or Buna^N-*rubber were used. All deck penetrations
were made using silver brazed bronze flanges. The deck was counterbored in way of deck penetrations to
a depth equal to the flange thickness and a coating of white lead applied for proper sealing.

Sanitary and galley wastes are transported to the impoundment tank via 3-in. Cu-Ni piping. Sweep tees and
45-degree elbows were used to avoid sharp corners. Where possible, the drainage piping was pitched 1/2-in.
per foot.

Use of plastic PVC piping was considered as a means of reducing costs, but was rejected because:

      a.    Previous experience with PVC drainage piping installations onboard submarines indicated
           maintenance problems associated with leaking joints. These problems are presumably related
           to the susceptibility of plastic joints to mechanical vibrations.

      b.    The additional operating costs attributable to the increased maintenance anticipated with PVC
           piping can easily offset the lower initial cost.

All piping running to or through the impoundment tank cover including the 3/4-in. flush line, 1-in. vent
line, 1/4-in. air line, and 3-in. drain and discharge lines was provided with flanged connections, as close
to the cover as possible, to facilitate tank removal.

Cu-Ni piping (1/4-in.) was run from the ship's air compressor to the flush control valves, bubble tube, and
level gages. In addition to an air filter, two lubricators were installed to ensure adequate lubrication of each
of the four pneumatic operators. Flexible polyethylene P-tubing was used inside the alarm and master
control station enclosures to permit  opening of the cover and for ease  of installation. A 1-in. Cu-Ni line
was run from the compressor to the  pump's air motor and included a manual control valve, air filter,
lubricator, and pressure gage,

Three inch suction and discharge hoses were selected for use with  the 2-in. diaphragm pump in order to:

      a.    Preclude any possibility  of clogging with solid waste material upstream and downstream
           of the sewage pump.

      b.    Minimize the pressure drop and thereby facilitate tank pump-out under all conditions.

      c.    Ensure compatibility with shore-based pumpers.

Wiring System

The electrical interconnection of the alarm and control stations, pushbuttons, control valves, power supply,
and pump motor contactor is delineated in Figure 19. Eighteen gage wire, enclosed in marine type armored
steel cable, was used between all terminal board connectors. Twenty gage wire was used for all internal
wiring. The current drain imposed by the system is very small. Each control valve, relay, or timer consumes
about 40 ma when operating. The photocell operates with a continuous power drain of only 0.3 w.
•Mention of commercial products does not imply endorsement by thafederal Water Pollution ControlAdministration.
                                              34

-------
 itovoc
MAJTt «
COMTKM.
STA TloW .
          tea
                                     TBfc
1
t
3
4





i
s
4
5
                                            STATION!
                                  Figure 19. Cable Diagram
                                            35

-------
                                        SECTION 5

                        OPERATIONAL TESTING AND EVALUATION


                   CONTROL SYSTEM ADJUSTMENT AND CALIBRATION

Following the installation of the entire waste impoundment system, various manual controls and time delay
relays associated with the master control and flush control stations had to be adjusted, and each volume
control valve had to be calibrated.

Level Sensing System
The rate of air flow to the bubble tube was adjusted at the flow controller to provide a minimum flow
consistent with satisfactory operation. A flow rate setting of 0.5 cfh was selected corresponding to a
bubble rate of approximately two bubbles per second. The small pressure and flow perturbations at the
bubble tube and flow controller had no apparent effect on the level gage readings.

Master Control Station
The high and low level indices which appear on the photohelic gage are adjustable from 0 to 60 in. The
high level alarm index was set at the 54-in. level (108 gallons), approximately 90 percent of tank capacity.
The low level index, which controls starting of the automatic flush, was set at the 4-in. level. The total
volume of sea water delivered to the tank during flushing is determined by the flow rate through the
manifold and the length of time the control valve is energized. A flush rate of 15 gpm was determined by
using the level gage as a cumulative flow indicator. The control valve was then calibrated to deliver 25 gallons
of flush water with a timer setting of 100 seconds. With all permissive switches in the ON position, a total
flush of 80 gallons can be attained in the same 100-second interval.

Sanitary Flush Control Station
Minimum and maximum flush volumes to suit each sanitary facility were obtained by adjusting the corre-
sponding short and long flush timers, and the rate of closure of the modified control valves. Short flush
times (0 to 10 sec) for the water closets were set to provide minimum flush volumes consistent with little
or no solids (micturition). Long flush times (1 to 20 sec) were set to handle  the maximum anticipated
needs of the operator (defecation). The rate of closure of the modified valves was reduced sufficiently
so as to eliminate water hammer, facilitate solids removal, and fill water seal to proper level.

Each control valve was calibrated by means of the tank level gage and elapsed time indicators. The actual
flush times and volumes used for each water closet and urinal are shown in Table 1. Also included are the
corresponding delay timer settings.

                         Table 1. Sanitary Flush Control Times and Volumes

Water Closet No. 1
Water Closet No. 2
Urinal
Short Flush
Volume, Time,
Gallons Seconds
2.6 1.4
2.3 1.6
0.12 1.0
Long Flush
Volume, Time,
Gallons Seconds
4.5 5.1
4.0 4.2
0.2 1.7
Delay
Time,
Minutes
4
4
2
The flush control times listed above correspond to the time during which the solenoid valve is energized,'
and does not correspond to the duration of a complete flush.
                                              37

-------
                      OPERATING RECORDS AND TEST EQUIPMENT

Operating data taken by the crew under routine operating conditions was recorded daily on an appropriate
log sheet. Sufficient information was gathered over a two-month period (mid-November to mid-January)
to establish the effectiveness of the various system components.

Appropriate log forms were used for each sanitary facility, tank pump-out and automatic flush, and the
trash compactor. For each usage of the water closet or urinal, the time and type of flush was recorded on
a daily log sheet. Whenever the impoundment  tank was pumped out, the following information was recorded:

    a.   Date and time of day.
    b.   Tank level and total pump-out time.
    c.   Type and number of tank flushes.
    d.   Sanitary flush control valve elapsed time readings.
    e.   Mode of pump-out.
                          Figure 20. Water Closet and Urinal Event Timers

-------
Three digital elapsed time indicators were installed to provide the data for item d (see Figure 20). These
timers were furnished as test equipment, and as such, are not a permanent part of the system. Each tinier
indicated the total time, in tenths of a second, that each corresponding flush control valve had been
energized. Thus the relative contributions of each sanitary facility to the total volume of sanitary and galley
waste accumulated in the tank was continuously monitored.

The operating effectiveness of the trash compactor was monitored by recording the frequency of
compaction and the level after each compaction.


                          EQUIPMENT PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS

A discussion of the operating effectiveness of the waste impoundment system installed on the Three Deuces
and demonstrated during the two-month test period  is presented below. The analysis has been broken down
into an evaluation of each of the primary subsystems and components and includes an analysis of the
operational test data recorded by the crew.

Waste Impoundment Station
The design and construction of the 120-gallon holding tank proved to be completely satisfactory in terms of:

      a.    Storage capacity. The frequency of tank pump-out with a normal crew of five, operating approxi-
           mately 12 hours per day, varied from two to five days. This rate is equivalent to an accumulation
           of 4 to 10 gallons per man per day. To service larger crews under the same storage space limi-
           tations, the use of form-fit tanks might be considered, despite the higher initial cost.

      b.    Efficient transfer of liquid and solid wastes. No clogging or plugging of the suction pipe was
           noted. Also no accumulation of solids at the bottom of the tank or on internal surfaces was
           in evidence.                                             I

      c.    Corrosion resistance. All internal and external surfaces appeared free from corrosion, and the
           tarset coating suffered no noticeable deterioration.

      d.    Air and water tightness. No traces of odor  nor evidence of leaking were observed throughout
           the test phase.

Periodic inspection of the inside surfaces of the tank through the Plexiglass viewport before, during, and
after flushing indicated that all surfaces were flushed and cleaned satisfactorily by the spray from the
perforated pipe  ring. No tendency for the flush manifold to clog was noted as indicated by an undiminished
flush rate (15 gpm) throughout the test period. If an increased flush rate is  desired, a substantial increase
in the number of perforations can be permitted without a significant decrease in impingement velocity
or uniformity of flow distribution.

The activated carbon filter served as an effective odor seal while venting the impoundment tank with
minimal pressure drop during normal operation. At no time during the two-month period were any traces
of odor detected by the crew. At the end of the test  period, the 5-lb bag of carbon was still performing
effectively. Preliminary estimates indicated that a 5-lb bag of activated carbon should last for a period of
at least 5 to 6 months. The actual replacement interval will vary depending on the frequency of pump-out,
engine room and atmospheric temperatures, etc.

Pressure drop through the carbon filter during pump-out was observed by noting the fluctuations in water
closet trap levels. Operation of the diaphragm pump  (7 cfm) gave rise to  fluctuations of from  1/2 to 1 in.
of water. A pressure drop of approximately 3/4 to 4 in. of water was observed when a septic tank truck was
used to pump out the tank (17 cfm). The insertion of a 6-in. diameter support screen raised the bag of
activated carbon sufficiently to decrease the pressure drop to approximately 1 in. of water.
                                            39

-------
The level sensing system performed accurately and reliably throughout the entire test period. Once
adjusted, the differential flow-controller provided a steady, uninterrupted flow of air at a rate of 0.5 cfh
to the bubble tube under all observed conditions. The 25 ft  compressor surge tank provided sufficient
air for continuous operation during periods when the ship's power was shut down. The readings of both
level gages appeared to be insensitive to both the ship's motion and the discontinuity of single bubble
formation. The crew considered the additional level gage at the alarm station desirable for continual and
convenient monitoring of the  tank level.

Master Control and Alarm Stations
All control and alarm equipment, once installed and calibrated, performed as designed without further
adjustment or modification. Operation of the master control station, located outside the deck house
with overhead shelter, was apparently unaffected by the rather severe weather encountered during the
test phase.

Although the sea water pump remained de-energized throughout the high level condition, a sufficient
quantity of flush water was available from the surge tank to permit several additional sanitary flushes,
if needed. During tank pump-out, an automatic flush (25 gallons) of the tank through the flush manifold
was generally followed by a total flush (80 gallons) as indicated in Figure 10. The second automatic flush
ensured a thorough flushing of the drain lines, suction line, and transfer hose.

Sanitary Flush Control System
The short and long flush timer settings listed  in Table 1, once adjusted and set early in the test period,
remained unchanged throughout. Since the sea water pressure was controlled within ±5 psi of the nominal
(30 psi), pressure variations during flushing had a negligible effect on the reproducibility of flush volumes.
Periodic checks of the flush times and volumes indicated that both the timer and needle valve settings were
stable throughout the test period.

The urinal and water closet  flush control valves were installed below deck, and the water closet valves
modified as shown in Figure 14. The flush control station performed as designed in each of the three
control modes, energizing and de-activating each valve for the appropriate period of time. The control
valves functioned flawlessly throughout the test phase. The reduced rate of closure characteristic of the
modified control valves, though adequate in terms of providing for shockless closing, filling of the trap,
and solids removal, was considered less than optimum in terms of the latter function. A control valve
modification which provides for a decreasing  rather  than linear rate of closure with time would have
permitted the use of somewhat lower water closet flush volumes. Such additional refinements, however,
were outside the scope of this program.

The results of the operational  test data concerning the effectiveness of the sanitary and galley waste volume
control devices are summarized in Table 2. The  sanitary waste volume contributions are based on the
elapsed time data and the flush volume calibrations. The galley sink contribution to the total was deter-
mined by difference. The results can be used to estimate holding tank capacity requirements for a particular
size crew and desired pump-out interval.

The results also definitely establish the practicability of a waste impoundment system for commercial
vessels of this class and size. Based on preliminary data obtained before the installation of the waste
impoundment system, the results shown in Table 2 represent an estimated reduction of at least 50 percent
in the total volume accumulation rates.

The tabulation also indicates that a further reduction in water closet flush volumes would have the largest
impact on the total accumulation rate. For example, a 50 percent reduction in both short flush and long
flush volumes would reduce the total accumulation rate by over 30 percent. Reductions of this magnitude
can probably be accomplished through the replacement of existing water closets with those having smaller
and shallower traps and a more efficient flushing action. Such water closets have been in use in  the United
Kingdom for many years and are being introduced in this country for domestic use.
                                            40

-------
                         Table 2.  Results of Waste Volume Control Data

Water Closets (2) Flush
Urinal Flush
Sanitary Waste
Total Sanitary Waste
Galley Sink
Total
Average
Volume Contribution
Gallons %
69.0 61
9.2 8
4.8 4
83.0 73
30.0 27
113.0 100
Average Volume
Per Man Per Day*
Gallons
4.6
0.6
0.3
5.5
2.0
7.5
Average pump-out interval:  3.0 days

Average crew size:  5 men
*Based on an average of 12 hours per day occupancy.
Further reductions in sanitary flush volumes can only be achieved by the use of a more efficient and
conceptually different approach to waste transfer, such as the vacuum flush system. In a system of this
type, wastes are air transported from specially designed water closets to a receiving tank by a central
vacuum system with the use of only 1/2 gallon of water per flush. Inclusion of such a vacuum flush system
could reduce the total volume accumulation rate from 7.5 to about 3.5 gallons per man-day.

It should be noted that the data summarized in Table 2 is based on a normal operating schedule for the
Three Deuces requiring an average occupancy of about 10 to 12 hours per day. Occasional trips to other
ports, requiring an occupancy of 24 hours per day, would  result in increased volumes per man-day.
Although the total sanitary waste volume is not expected to change significantly, the increased galley
activity could easily double the galley sink contribution, and thereby decrease the pump-out interval to
about 2 days  or less.

Galley Waste Control Equipment
Storage of the solid galley waste in the specially designed trash compactor was a satisfactory and practical
means of increasing effective storage capacity. The ease with which the compactor crushed tin cans, glass
bottles, etc, was amply demonstrated onboard the Three Deuces as well as in pre-installation testing. Results
of the testing showed that an average of two weeks' worth of solid galley waste can be stored in the
compactor before removal of the compressed garbage in its plastic bag. Based on an observed compaction
ratio ofabout 5:1, this amount is equivalent to approximately 14 ft^of uncompacted galley waste.

Operation of the unit was relatively easy. Safe handling by a single individual was ensured by installing a
counterweight assembly whose weight balanced that of the cylinder and compactor assemblies (not over
100 Ib). The entire compaction operation can be performed in about 30 to 60 seconds. Removing
compacted garbage and inserting an empty plastic bag can be done in less than 2 minutes. The use of
relatively strong plastic bags (at least 5 mils thick) to minimize the possibility of tearing is recommended.
It was also found advantageous to spray a thin film of Teflon onto the inner surface of the inner cylinder
to facilitate extraction of the compacted garbage.
                                          41

-------
Operation of the self-closing spray nozzle in conjunction with the galley sink mixing valve was judged to
be adequate for the needs of the crew under normal operating conditions in terms of operating convenience
and adequate flow rates. The exclusive use of a spray nozzle for the needs of a larger galley and crew might
become inconvenient. In such a situation, the use of two separate (hot and cold) self-closing valves with
a single swinging spout is recommended.

Pump-Out Station
The primary mode of emptying the impoundment tank during the two-month test period was by means
of the deck-mounted sewage pump. In the absence of accessible sewer lines, transfer of wastes to a sewer
system was simulated by pumping into a portable 1500 gallon dockside storage tank via 100 feet of
collapsible rubber-lined hose. On occasion, circumstances dictated pump-out of the tank while at sea, A
septic tank pumper was used on a rather limited basis largely because of the irregularity of the Three Deuces
work schedule.

The capability of tank pump-out by a septic tank truck was established early in the test period. Compatibility
with the impoundment system in terms of mating to the quick-connect deck fitting and efficient pump-out
of the holding tank was successfully demonstrated (see Figure 21). A maximum pump-out rate of 120 gpm
was observed. A total pump-out time of approximately 5 minutes was largely determined by the length and
number of tank flushes.

The ah- motor-driven diaphragm pump performed more than adequately. The pump speed, controlled by a
globe valve on the 1-in. air line to the motor, reached a maximum at a 30-gpm delivery rate. The pump
primed itself in a matter of seconds and proceeded to pump out the tank, with two automatic flushes, in an
average total time of about 8 minutes. Quick-connect fittings were used to couple both the suction and
discharge hoses to the pump inlet and outlet, as shown in Figure 18, and provided water-tight and air-tight
seals on both ends.

The pump's drain plug was replaced with a petcock to facilitate drainage of water from the pump body after
each use. To maximize the rate of air flow to the motor inlet, a 1-in. air (moisture) filter was used in place
of the standard 1/4-in. size, and the lubricator installed in a parallel loop as shown in Figure 22. In very
cold weather, "icing" of the air exhaust muffler necessitated its temporary removal during pump-out.


                            NORMAL SYSTEM MAINTENANCE

A minimal amount of routine maintenance is required to keep the  system fully operational. The actual
amount of time involved is, for all practical purposes, negligible by comparison with the crew's normal
maintenance routine. Those items which require regular or periodic inspection and servicing are listed below:

     a.    Lubricators. Check level of oil in air line lubricators feeding the control valves and the air  motor
           periodically, and refill to proper level as required.

     b.    Air Filters. Check level of condensate in air filters periodically, and drain as required.

     c.    Carbon Vent Filter. Check for unpleasant odors emanating from the tank vent. Estimated
           frequency of replacement of 5-lb carbon bag is about once every 6 months. Actual replacement
           time is approximately 2 minutes.

     d.    Diaphragm Pump. Drain water from pump body after each use. Change gear oil every 500 hours
           of operation or twice a year (every summer and winter). Grease pump rod alemite fitting every
           100 hours of operation.
                                             42

-------
Figure 21. Pump-out by Septic Tank Truck

-------
MANUAL
CONTROL
VALVE
           Figure 22. Pump Air Motor Accessories

-------
                                        SECTION 6

                                 SYSTEM COST SUMMARY


                                       INITIAL COST

A summary of the initial costs within each subsystem, including material, fabrication, and installation
costs is presented in Table 3. The total initial cost of the entire waste impoundment system installed
onboard the Three Deuces amounts to $8,970. Approximately 65 percent ($5,875) of the total cost is
attributable to the impoundment and transfer functions (including tank flushing). The remaining
35 percent is associated with the sanitary and galley waste control systems.

Due to the developmental nature of this program and the fact that the demonstration system is essentially
a custom-made unit, the costs shown in Table  3 are necessarily conservative, especially with regard to
Items A and D. With the experience gained from this program, cost effective modifications coupled with
large-scale production should decrease the  cost of components such as the impoundment tank and trash
compactor by 50 to 75 percent.

The costs shown in Item F (piping and wiring systems) reflect, to a large extent, the location of the various
components relative to existing ship's services  and sanitary and galley facilities, and can vary substantially
with each installation. These costs also reflect  installation on a non-interference basis (100 percent
availability of the vessel). Due to the limited availability of the Three Deuces, the actual charges incurred
were greater.


                                    OPERATING COSTS

The system operating costs,excluding tank pump-out, are those associated with the following consumable
items:

                        Activated carbon              =  $30 per year
                        Plastic bags and chemical
                        disinfectant (trash compactor)  =  $19 per year
                        Lubrication fluid (air lines)      =  $2 per year
                        Compressed air*               -  $3 per year
                        Electrical power               =  $1 per year
                        Total                         =  $55 per year

                        *Based on allowance for operation of the ship's air
                          compressor. Activated carbon costs can be reduced
                          to approximately $10 per year by purchasing
                          200-lb drums of a standard commercial grade
                          activated carbon.

The cost of tank pump-out will depend on the specific mode used. Alternate methods and corresponding
costs are listed in Table 4. The cost of operating the deck-mounted pump includes an allowance for
operation of the ship's air compressor, for pump gear oil, and air motor lubricant. The yearly operating
cost (using transfer mode A) would then total $70. The yearly cost of regular pump-out by a septic tank
pumper on an individual or group basis is obviously expensive for vessels of this size. In the absence of
dockside sewer lines or waste treatment faculties, transfer to a dockside holding tank for monthly
pump-out by a septic tank truck will reduce the cost substantially.
                                          45

-------
                                        Table 3. Summary of Capital (Initial) Costs




Subsystem/Component
A.




B.





C.



D.



E.




F.




Impoundment Station
Impoundment Tank
Flush Manifold
Vent Filter
Total
Tank Control Systems
Master Control Station
Alarm Station
Level Sensing System
Flush Control Valve (1)
Total
Sanitary Control System
Flush Control Station
Flush Control Valves (3)
Total
Galley Waste Control
Trash Compactor
Galley Sink Faucet
Total
Pump-Out Station
Pump and Air Motor
Suction and Discharge Hose
Quick-Connect Fittings
Total
Piping and Wiring Systems
Piping, Fittings, Valves
Electrical Wiring
Total
Grand Total
Material/
Component
Cost ($)

125
20
35
181

212
55
70
113
450

261
334
595

75
25
100

620
230
90
940

1,375
105
M«0
$3,745
Fabrication/
Assembly
Cost($)

425
100
55
580

225
130
—
—
225

160
_
T60

1,335
—
1,335









$2,330

Installation
Cost ($)

150
_
^
150

85
45
30
15
175

120
140
260

50
15
65

45
—
	
45

1,650
550
2,200
$2,895*

Total
Cost ($)




910





880



1,015



1,500




985



3,680
$8,970
•Based on an average labor rate of $6.50 per hi.

-------
                           Table 4. Tank Pump-out Alternatives

A.   Deck-mounted (or portable) pump =                         $15 per year
B.   Septic tank pumper
          1.    Regular pump-out on individual basis
               = $45 per pump-out x 100 pump-outs per year =     $4,500 per year
          2.    Regular pump-out on group basis
               = $25 per pump-out x 100 pump-outs per year =     $2,500 per year
          3.    Transfer to and monthly pump-out of 1,500
               gallon dockside storage tank = $45 per pump-out
               x 12 pump-outs per year = $540 per year
               + $ 15 per year (Item A) =                        $555 per year
                                       47

-------
                                       SECTION 7

                                  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This project  was carried out by General Dynamics' Electric Boat division under Contract No. 14-12-509
for the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, Department of the Interior. Harold Wallman was
Project Manager and Sheldon Cohen was Project Engineer.

Acknowledgement is made of the support and assistance of James R. Bailey, Sanitary Engineer; Jean
Mador, Sr. Mechanical Engineer; Russell J. Nickerson, Instrumentation Supervisor; William E. Thayer,
Electrical Engineer; and the crew of the Three Deuces tugboat for their cooperation during the installation
and operational phase of the project.
                                            49

-------
 1   •Accession Number
~~—I
   Subject
Field it Group
                                                             SELECTED  WATER  RESOURCES ABSTRACTS
                                                                       INPUT TRANSACTION  FORM
 c  Organization

         General Dynamics' Electric Boat division, Groton, Connecticut
    Title
         STORAGE OF WASTES FROM WATERCRAFT AND DISPOSAL AT SHORE FACILITIES
10

[Authors)
Cohen, Sheldon
11

16

Date
APRIL, 1970
12

Pages
56
Project Number
15020DHB03/70
21

* c Contract Number
FWPCA
CONTRACT NO. 14-12-509
Note
22
    Citation
    Descriptors (Starred first)
        *Water pollution control
        *Water management (Applied)
        "Capital costs
                Operating costs
                Holding tank
                Sewage disposal
    Identifiers (Starred First)
 27 [Abstract
         This program was undertaken to establish the effectiveness and acceptability of a watercraft impoundment system in
         controlling the principal waste sources, sanitary and galley waste, with disposal at a shore facility. A demonstration unit
         was designed, built, and installed by Electric Boat on a commercial tugboat, and operationally tested and evaluated
         under routine working conditions for a period of two months. Results of the test data were analyzed, and component
         performance and system effectiveness were evaluated. Equipment and installation costs, as well as system operating
         costs, were identified.

         Sea water flushing was used for the water closets and urinal, but water conservation was used in the form of specially
         designed sanitary flush control and galley sink volume control devices to allow the use of a relatively small (120 gallon
         capacity) holding tank. The corrosion-resistant tank was provided with a level sensing system, an odor controlled vent
         line, an automatic flushing system, and a high level alarm. Shore-side transfer of the impounded wastes by suction
         pump-out of the tank via a quick-connect deck fitting was demonstrated. Solid galley waste was stored in a specially
         designed trash compactor.

         All components and subsystems performed effectively and reliably throughout the test phase. The system  was judged
         simple  to operate and requires minimal operating attention and maintenance.

         This report is submitted in fulfillment of Contract No. 14-12-509 between the Federal Water Pollution Control
         Administration and General Dynamics' Electric Boat Division.
                                                        Abstractor
                                                                    Sheldon Cohen
                                                        Institution
                                                                    General Dynamics' Electric Boat division.
 WR;102 (REV.
 WRSIC
             OCT.  1986)
                                     SEND TO:  WATER RESOURCES SCIENTI FIC INFORMATION CENTER
                                               U S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
                                               WASHINGTON, D.C. 20240
                                                                                                             • 5PO: 1969-324-444

-------