N  S  T  I  T  U  T  E
                                                                 RTI/1864/50-03 F
                                                                 December  7,  1982
                                        Final Report

                         POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS IN THE ENVIRONMENT
                                     AND FRESHWATER FISH

                                             by

                                         R. M. Lucas
                                     V, G. lannacchione
                                        D. K. Melroy
                                 Research Triangle Institute
                                   Research Triangle Park
                                    North Carolina  27709
                              2PA Contract Number:  68-01-5848
                               Project Officer:  Joseph Carra
                                 Task Manager:  Richard Levy
                            U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                                 Office of Toxic Substances
                                Exposure Evaluation Division
                                Design and Development Branch
                                     401 M Street, S.W.
                                   Washington, D.C.  20460
RESEARCH  TRIANGLE  PARK,  NORTH  CAROLINA  27709

-------
This report was prepared under contract to an agency of
the United States Government.  Neither the United States
Government nor any of its employees, contractors,
subcontractors, or their employees makes any warranty,
expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or
responsibility for any third party's use or the results
of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or
process disclosed in this report, or represents that its
use by such third party would not infringe on privately
owned rights.

Publication of the data in this document does not signify
that the contents necessarily reflect the joint or separate
views and policies of each sponsoring agency.  Mention of
trade names or commercial products does not constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.

-------
                                                       RTI/1864/50-03 F
                                                       December 7, 1982
                              Final Report

              POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS IN THE ENVIRONMENT
                           AND FRESHWATER FISH

                                   by

                               R. M. Lucas
                           V. 6. lannacchione
                              D. K. Melroy
                       Research Triangle Institute
                         Research Triangle Park
                          North Carolina  27709
                    EPA Contract Number:  68-01-5848
                     Project Officer:  Joseph Carra
                       Task Manager:  Richard Levy
                  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
                       Office of Toxic Substances
                      Exposure Evaluation Division
                      Design and Development Branch
                           401 M Street,  S.W.
                         Washington, D.C.  20460
                                        Approved by:
Robert M. Lucas, Task Leader
Research Triangle Institute
Stephen R. Williams, Project Leader
Research Triangle Institute

-------
                            Table of Contents
1.   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY	       1

2.   INTRODUCTION 	       2

3.   ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SUMMARY 	       3

     3.1  Urban Soils Monitoring Network	       3

          3.1.1  General Description of the Network 	       3
          3.1.2  Historical Uses of the Network	       3
          3.1.3  Limitations as a Monitoring Network	       3
          3.1.4  Overview of Network Designs	       3
          3.1.5  Summary of Polychloriaated Biphenyl Data .  .       4

     3.2  Rural Soil Monitoring Network 	       4

          3.2.1  General Description of the Network 	       4
          3.2.2  Overview of Sample Design	       4
          3.2.3  Limitations of the Network	       8
          3.2.4  Summary of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Data
                 from the Network	       8

     3.3  National Surface Water Monitoring Program 	       9

          3.3.1  General Description of the Monitoring
                 Program	       5
          3.3.2  Limitations of Statistical Inferences.  ...       9
          3.3.3  Summary of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Data . .       9

4.   POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS IN FRESHWATER FISH  	      16

     4.1  General Description of the Study	      16
     4.2  Overview of the Study Design	      16
     4.3  Statistical Limitation of Data	      16
     4.4  Summary of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in  Freshwater
          Fish Data	     l6

5.   SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS	     19

     5.1  Introduction	     1^
     5.2  Comparisons Among Media  	     19

6.   REFERENCES	     21

-------
                             List of Tables

Table                                                            Page

 3.1  Summary of Sample Sizes and Percent of Detections of
      Polychlorinated Biphenyls by Calendar Year and Medium
      for the Urban Soil Monitoring Network 	      5

 3.2  Summary of Positive Values of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
      by Calendar Year and Type of Lawn Soil	      6

 3.3  Summary of Positive Values of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
      by Calendar Year and Type of Waste Soil	      7

 3.4  Summary of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Data Collected from
      Cropland Areas of the Rural Soil Monitoring Network .  .     10

 3.5  Summary of the Prevalence of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
      in Surface Water	     12

 3.6  Summary of the Prevalence of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
      in Bottom Sediment	     13

 3.7  Summary of the Prevalence of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
      in Bottom Sediment	     14

 3.8  Summary of Positive Values of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
      in Bottom Sediment	•     15

 4.1  Summary of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Freshwater
      Fish	     17
                             List of Figures

Figure                                                           Page

 5.1  Diagram of Collection Time Periods of Polychlorinated
      Biphenyl Data by Media	      20

-------
                            ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS








     The authors would  like  to thank the Task Manager, Mr. Richard Levy




for his assistance  and  direction in producing this report.  The authors




would also like to thank Mr.  Anthony Inglis, Ms. Ann Carey and Mr. Daniel




Heggem  of  the Field  Studies  Branch, Exposure  Evaluation Division,  for




thier assistance and  comments  in completing this document.  The authors




also  thank  Ms. Martha Clegg  for  her  fine  efforts  in  typing  this




manuscript.

-------
1.   EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

     This  report  gives  a summary of the prevalence  and levels of poly-
chlorinated  biphenyls  (PCBs) in  fresh water  fish  and the environment.
Data collected  from the Urban Soil Network, the Rural Soil Network, and
the National Surface Water Monitoring Program are reviewed and summarized.
Additional  materials  on PCBs  in freshwater  fish  supplied to  the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency by the U.S.  Department  of the Interior
(USDI) are also included.

     The percent  of specimens  with detectable amount  of  PCS  residue in
urban  and   suburban soil  ranged  from  0.0 percent  in 1970 to  over 10
percent in 1978, and averaged 3.3 percent during that period.   Only 2 of
7,664  specimens of  rural soils were found  to  contain  detectable levels
of PCB residue.

     The percent  of surface water specimens  with detectable  amounts of
PCB varied  greatly  with a  maximum of 35.5 percent in the spring quarter
of 1975 and a minimum of 0.0 in many other quarters.   The percent detected
in bottom sediment  ranged from over 50 percent during the spring quarter
of 1975 to 8.1 percent in the fall quarter of 1979.   The percent detected
appears to  decline  from 1975  to  1980 in both water and  sediment data.
The levels  of PCBs  in water and  sediment  in which  detected values were
noted  vary  widely  from  year to  year  and  within the  year, but  do not
exhibit any  apparent  trends  or patterns.   The levels  found in sediment
tend  to  be  at  least a  factor of  10  higher than  the levels  found in
surface water.

     The percentage  in tissue specimens from freshwater fish with detect-
able levels  of  PCBs  increases  from 91.5  percent  in  1976-1977  to 98.1
percent in 1978-1979.
                                    -1-

-------
2.   INTRODUCTION

     This report presents a concise summary of the prevalence and levels
of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in several environmental media.  The
primary  sources  for this  report are  previously prepared  preliminary
reports on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (US EPA) monitoring
programs for  water,  water sediment,  soil, and their computer accessible
data files.  Additional materials provided by the US EPA are also included
as sources.

     Chapter  three  deals with  PCBs  in the environment.   The  first two
sections describe PCB  residue  levels found in soil  collected  in the US
EPA's  National  Soil Monitoring  Program.   Section  one  describes  and
presents results  from  the Urban Soils Network,  and  section  two relates
to  the Rural  Soils  Network.   Section  three  summarizes  information on
PCBs found in surface water and bottom sediment collected in the National
Surface Water Monitoring Program.   Chapter  four summarizes  PCB levels
found  in fresh  water fish based on unpublished  information  provided to
the US EPA by the USDI.   Chapter five  gives  a  concise  overview of the
PCB data and  points  out similarities and differences among  the various
media investigated.   Chapter six includes a list of all documents refer-
enced in the report.

     In order to  limit  the  amount of  material presented, only  brief
descriptions  of the monitoring programs and  studies  and their survey
design are  given.  The  reader  is advised of  potential  limitations in
making inferences beyond the sample data.  References are included for
the reader interested in more detail.

     Several  terms that have rigorous statistical definitions  are  used
in  the report.   Below  are  nontechnical definitions  for these terms.

     Target Population;   The universe to which  an investigator wishes to
     make inferences.  Examples are  the  civilian population in the U.S.
     or all rural soils  in the U.S.  to  a depth of three  inches, as  of a
     specific point in time.

     Sampling Frame:   A  list or inventory of  the entire  universe to be
     sampled.   Examples  are  a  list  of  all counties in the U.S.,  or  a
     conceptualized  list  of  all  3  inch cubes of top-soil in  the  U.S.

     Probability Sampling;  A process by which each unit  on a  sampling
     frame  may  be  selected  for  study  with  a  known  and  positive
     probability.
                                    -2-

-------
3.   ENVIRONMENTAL DATA SUMMARY

     3.1  Urban Soils Monitoring Network

          3.1.1  General Description of the Network

                 The  National  Soil Monitoring  Program consists  of two
networks:  the Urban Soils Monitoring Network (USMN) and the Rural Soils
Monitoring  Network.    Areas  considered  to  be  urban  in character are
monitored by  the  Urban Soils Monitoring Network.   Over  the past twelve
years  such monitoring  efforts have  been undertaken  in 42  cities and
Standard  Metropolitan  Statistical Areas  (SMSAs).   Between  5  and  14
cities were sampled  each year between 1969 (FY70) and 1979 (FY80),  each
city being  resampled  every six years with the  second  cycle starting in
1975  (FY76).   Residues of  thirteen pesticides and polychlorinated bi-
phenyls  (PCBs) were  detected in the associated urban  soil  samples, and
in addition, residue levels of three metals were measured.  A listing of
the  pesticide residue and  metals  is given  in a  USMN report  (McDonald
1981).  A description of the chemical analysis method is given in Whitmore
et al.  (1980).   This section presents a concise  summary of the residue
levels for 1970 through 1978.

          3.1.2  Historical Uses of the Network

                 The  major  historical   objectives of  the  Urban Soils
Monitoring  Network  (USMN)  were to monitor  pesticide residue  in urban
areas for prevalence, levels, and trends over time.

          3.1.3  Limitations as a Monitoring Network

                 The  Urban  Soils  Monitoring Network  has  not  yet  been
used  to its  fullest  potential as  a monitoring network.   Because Urban
Soils  sampling  has  not  been based on  a strict  probability  structure
(McDonald,  1981), inferences  about residue  levels for  urban  areas  in
general  at the national or regional level have limited defensibility and
are  of  unknown  accuracy.  Because of  the  above  mentioned inferential
limitations,  the  PCBs  summaries  presented  below relate  only  to the
sampled  cities.

          3.1.4  Overview of Network Designs

                 The  Urban Soils  Monitoring Network has monitored four
classes  of  compounds in  urban soils:   organochlorine  pesticides and
PCBs,   trifluralin,   organophosphorus   pesticides,  and  heavy metals.
Forty-two  urban  areas across the United States have been monitored on a
rotating basis  since 1969.   Two   different  sample designs were  tried
experimentally  in 1969  and 1970,  and a third  sample  design was imple-
mented  in  1971 to  be  used  in all subsequent years.  These sample  designs
are  described in detail in  the NSMP report  (Whitmore et  al,  1981).  The
first  two  sample designs each had  a single  stage  of stratification with
three  stages  of selection:  cities, grid units (land areas  of  fixed and
equal  size),  and sample  sites.  Stratification  in  1969 was  based  on geo-
graphic regions,  and  in 1970 was  based on  the  population size of the
urban  areas.   Soil specimens were  collected  from 400 sites in 8 cities
in 1969 and from 356  sites  in  14 cities  in 1970.

                                    -3-

-------
     For  1971  through  1975,  the sampling frame used was the list of 243
SMSAs  in  the  United  States,  as defined  in the  1970  U.S.  Census.   Two
stages  of stratification were  used:   size  of  population at  the first
stage  and,  at  the second stage, sample SMSAs were stratified into urban
and  suburban  areas.   Sites were  selected  at  a  rate of one  site  per
square  mile  (2.6  km2)  in the urban stratum,  and one site per 20 square
miles  (51.8 km2) in the suburban stratum.

          3.1.5  Summary of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Data

                 Data  for  1970 through 1978 are  available  in computer
accessable  form.   The  sample   sites  are   classified  into  one of  four
categories (Whitmore et al 1980):  (i) urban lawn soil, (ii) urban waste
soil,  (iii) suburban lawn soil, and (iv) suburban waste soil.  Table 3.1
presents  the  number of  soil  specimens collected  by  category  and  year
where  PCBs were measured and  the percentage of  the  specimens  that con-
tained  positive  amounts  of PCBs.   For years  in which  specimens  were
collected from both  soil categories  and both waste categories, the data
are combined to give an overall estimate.

     Because the percentages detected are  very low,  additional summari-
zation  seems of little use.   Table 3.2 presents  number  of  positive PCB
values  recorded  in  lawn soil,  and  the  minimum  and  maximum  of those
values  by year.   Table  3.3 contains  the  same summary format  for waste
soil.  These data are not indicative of a  ubiquitous  presence of PCBs in
the categories.  Among the maximum positive values, only two are over 10
ppm.  One is 60.80 ppm from suburban lawn  soil in 1973, and  the other is
11.94 ppm from urban waste soil in 1971.

     3.2  Rural Soil Monitoring Network

          3.2.1  General Description of the Network

                 The Rural Soils Monitoring Network (RSMN) is the second
component of  the  National Soil Monitoring Program  and was  intended to
monitor all  soil  in  the  conterminous United  States except   in areas
considered to  be  urban  in  character.  The urban  areas are  included in
the scope of the USMN discussed in the previous  section.

     Because the  RSMN  is  a  probability  sample  of  rural soils,  valid
generalizations about  all rural soils in  the conterminous United States
and  other  reasonably  large  geographic areas  are  possible with  some
limitations discussed below.

          3.2.2  Overview of Sample Design

                 A  detailed  description   of the  RSMN  survey  design,
compounds targeted for chemical analysis,  and evaluation  of  the chemical
analysis  methods  are given in  the NSMP report  (Whitmore et al,  1981).
Only a brief overview is given below.

     The  Rural Soil Network (RSN)  is a probability sample of 10-acre
sites  from  the population of  all  rural land areas  in the  conterminous
United  States.  Each  10-acre  site  is  located by a probability  subsample
                                    -4-

-------
                  Table 3.1  Summary of Sample Sizes and Percent Detections  of  Polychlorinated  Biphenyls
                             by Calendar Year and Medium for the Urban  Soil  Monitoring Network*
Medium
Urban Lawn Soil
Urban Waste Soil
Urban (Combined)
Suburban Lawn Soil
Suburban Waste Soil
Suburban (Combined)

Urban Lawn Soil
Urban Waste Soil
Urban (Combined)
Suburban Lawn Soil
Suburban Waste Soil
Suburban (Combined)

Sample
Size
163
137
300
0
0
0

Sample
Size
245
122
367
0
0
0
1970
Percent
Detected
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
1975
Percent
Detected
2.9
4.9
3.6
NA
NA
NA

Sample
Size
104
42
146
40
137
177

Sample
Size
199
144
343
0
0
0
1971
Percent
Detected
1.9
7.1
4.7
2.5
1.5
1.7
1976
Percent
Detected
8.0
9.0
8.4
NA
NA
NA

Sample
Size
73
88
161
67
203
270

Sample
Size
79
73
152
20
43
63
1972
Percent
Detected
1.4
3.4
2.5
1.5
0.5
0.7
1977
Percent
Detected
6.3
4.1
5.2
0.0
0.0
0.0

Sample
Size
114
89
203
76
156
232

Sample
Size
39
64
103
54
188
242
1973
Percent
Detected
3.5
3.4
3.5
3.9
0.6
1.7
1978
Percent
Detected
10.3
3.1
5.8
0.0
0.5
0.4
1974
Sample
Size
82
82
164
110
172
282
All
Sample
Size
1105
901
2006
367
898
1265
Percent
Detected
2.4
7.3
4.9
2.7
1.2
1.8
Years
Percent
Detected
3.7
4.3
4.0
2.2
0.8
1.2
NA:  Calculation is not applicable with available data.

*
 Source:  Calculated by the Research Triangle Institute  with data  collected  from the Urban  Soils  Monitoring Network
          sponsored by the U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.

-------
     Table 3.2  Summary of Positive Values of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
                by Calendar Year and Type of Lawn Soil*
Calendar
Year
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
Type of
Lawn
Soil
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Sample
Size
163
0
104
40
73
67
114
76
82
110
245
0
199
0
79
20
39
0
Number of
Positive
Values
0
NA
2
1
1
1
4
3
2
3
7
NA
16
NA
5
0
4
NA
Minimum
Positive
Value
(ppm)**
NA
NA
0.20
0.26
1.01
0.94
0.40
0.21
1.08
0.50
0.04
NA
0.04
NA
0.04
NA
0.10
NA
Maximum
Positive
Value
(ppm)**
NA
NA
3.30
0.26
1.01
0.94
1.59
60.80
1.70
1.00
0.67
NA
2.62
NA
4.52
NA
0.81
NA
NA:  Calculation is not applicable with available data.

 * Source:  Calculated by the Research Triangle Institute with data collected
            from the Urban Soils Monitoring Network of EPA.

** parts per million
                                    -6-

-------
     Table 3.3  Summary of Positive Values of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
                by Calendar Year and Type of Waste Soil*
Calendar
Year
1970
1971
1972
1973
1974
1975
1976
1977
1978
Type of
Waste
Soil
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Urban
Suburban
Sample
Size
137
0
42
137
86
203
89
156
82
172
122
0
144
0
73
43
64
188
Number of
Positive
Values
0
NA
3
2
3
1
3
1
6
2
6
NA
13
NA
3
0
2
1
Minimum
Positive
Value
(ppm)**
NA
NA
0.70
0.09
0.34
1.31
0.18
0.61
0.39
0.40
0.03
NA
0.03
NA
0.08
NA
1.65
0.08
Maximum
Positive
Value
(ppm)**
NA
NA
11.94
0.36
1.31
1.31
0.63
0.61
3.33
0.97
0.36
NA
1.87
NA
0.09
NA
7.81
0.08
NA:  Calculation is not applicable with available data.

 *Source:  Calculated by the Research Triangle Institute with data collected
           from the Urban Soils Monitoring Network of EPA.

** parts per million
                                    -7-

-------
of the data  points  of the 1967 Conservation Needs Inventory (CNI) (USDA
1966).   The  CNI, in  turn,  is  a  probability sample  of all  rural  land
areas (USDA 1966) in the conterminous United States.

     The CNI  is a  stratified  random sample  of primary  sampling units
(PSUs) from  each county  of  the conterminous United  States,  except for
those counties strictly metropolitan in character.  The standard size of
the  PSUs  was 160 acres,  although 40-acre, 100-acre,  and  640-acre  PSUs
were not uncommon.  The  standard  sampling rate was two percent, however
this  rate  was increased  or  decreased in order either  to  provide esti-
mates of nearly  equal precision for all counties or to oversample areas
of special interest.   The sampling rates varied within strata from less
than one percent to approximately thirty-two percent.

     Data were  collected for  each of a  series of points  at  every CNI
sample site.   The land-use  data  collected for each  CNI  sampling point
was  used  to  classify  the point as  either a cropland point or  a  non-
cropland point.   The  sampling  design of the RSMN  specified  that 0.025
percent of the cropland  and  0.0025  percent  of the  noncropland  of the
rural conterminous  United States  would  be sampled from each  State.   A
subsample of the  CNI  cropland  sampling points was  selected and used to
locate the  RSMN  cropland sample  sites.   The  RSMN  noncropland  sample
sites were located by a subsample of the CNI noncropland sampling points.

     The  operational  design of the  RSMN  specified that  each  cropland
site be randomly designated as  a first-year, second-year,  third-year,  or
fourth-year cropland site, such that one-fourth of the cropland sites in
each  State would be  sampled  each fiscal year.   Noncropland  sites  were
handled in the same manner.   Specimens were to be collected at each site
no less  than once  every four  years  and not more  than once  per year.
Soil  specimens  were  obtained by compositing  fifty  soil cores,  2-inches
in diameter  by 3-inches  in  depth.   Cropland  specimens were  to  be ob-
tained immediately before or at harvest time.

          3.2.3  limitations of the Network

                 The  Rural  Soils  Network  (RSN)  design specified  that
0.025 percent of the cropland acreage and 0.0025 percent of the noncrop-
land acreage was  to  be sampled in each  State.   This  criterion resulted
in sample sizes that vary considerably from one State to another.   Rhode
Island received  the  fewest  sampling units,  four  each of  cropland  and
noncropland sites.  Texas received the  most,  744 cropland sites and 344
noncropland sites.  Thus, reliable estimates of average pesticide levels
are not available for some geographic areas.  This is a minor limitation
because estimates are not generally required for small geographic areas.
A more serious limitation results from the purposive exclusion of several
States in the Rocky Mountain regions in the implementation of the network,
thus  reducing  the area to which statistical inferences are valid, which
consists  then of  the total  U.S.,  exclusive  of those states  omitted.

          3.2.4  Summary of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Data from the Network

                 Because  the  survey design resulted  in a  cyclic sample
with  a period  of four years, the data can be summarized by round (group
of four  years)  and  by fiscal year.  Only two soil specimens out of 6093

                                    -8-

-------
 in  round one  (approximately fiscal  1969  to 1973) contained detectable
 amounts  of  PCBs.   Table 3.4 summarizes  the  sample sizes and percent of
 specimens containing detectable levels of PCB by fiscal year  (1969-1974)
 found  in soil from cropland areas.   During  the same sampling period, no
 detectable  levels  of PCBs were found in 238 noncropland soil specimens.
 These  data  do not  suggest any widespread contamination of PCB in cropland
 soil  during the study  period.   The  sample  sizes  for noncropland areas
 are insufficient to indicate the prevalence and levels of contamination.

     3.3  National Surface Water Monitoring Program

          3.3.1  General Description  of the Monitoring Program

                 The National  Surface Water  Monitoring Program (NSWMP)
 is  based on  the  National  Stream  Quality  Accounting  Network  (NASQAN)
 operated  by  the  U.S.   Geological  Survey (USGS).  As  of May  13,  1980,
 there  were  518 NASQAN fixed-site monitoring stations dispersed throughout
 the U.S. and Puerto Rico (USGS 1980).

     To  form  the NSWMP, 161 NASQAN stations were  selected  (Lucas D. et
 al 1980).   Several of  the 161 stations were never activated.  A listing
 of the 152 NASQAN stations active as  of September 1979 is given in Lucas
 D. et  al (1980).   The   152 active  stations  are  geographically dispersed
 throughout  the  entire   U.S.  and  Puerto Rico.   The site  locations  were
 purposefully  located- at sites  that account for approximately 90% of the
 outflow  from  a watershed.   For  watersheds  along  the periphery  of  the
 country  (coastal  regions,  Great Lakes,  international  boundaries)  where
 the 90 percent  outflow  goal was impractical, a "representative" station
 or array of stations was chosen.

          3.3.2  Limitations of Statistical Inferences

                 Because the stations were selected purposefully,  infer-
 ences  to some larger target population such  as  all  surface water  and
bottom sediment in the  U.S.  might be questioned.  However,  because  the
 specimens are  collected seasonally and  for several  years,  differences
 among  seasons and  years at  the  collection sites  may be  detectable.

          3.3.3  Summary of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Data

                 Specimens of  surface water are  collected  four  times
each year during the winter,  spring, summer and fall quarters and  speci-
mens of  sediment are collected  twice a year during  the spring  and fall
quarters.  The quarters, winter,  spring,  summer,  and fall,  are associated
in this  presentation with the periods January-March,  April-June,  July-
September,  and  October-December,  respectively.   These periods  are  used
instead of  the  typical  seasons  because they more  closely correspond to
the actual  sampling periods.  Because the prevalence and levels of  PCB
vary considerably among seasons  within a  year,  useful information  may be
lost if the seasons were combined for annual statistics.

     On the NSWMP computer accessible data files,  PCBs are  identified as
PCB or one or  more of  several  aroclor  mixtures  1242,  1248,  1254  and
 1260.   Table  3.5  summarizes the prevalence  of  PCB and Aroclor 1254 in
                                    -9-

-------
      Table 3.4  Summary of Polychlorinated Biphenyl Data Collected
                 from Cropland Areas of the Rural Soil Monitoring
                 Network*
Round
1
1
1
1
Subtotal
Round 1
2

Fiscal
Year
69
70
72
73
74
Total
Specimen
Material
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Soil
Sample
Size
1722
1503
1486
1482
6093
1470
7663
Percent
Detected
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.14
0.03
1.63
0.34
NA:  Calculation is not applicable with available data.
*
 Source:  Calculated by the Research Triangle Institute from the computer
          accessible data files supplied by the U.S. Environmental
          Protection Agency.
                                    -10-

-------
surface  water by  each  season  and  fiscal  year.   Almost  all  specimens
analyzed for  1254  were also analyzed for 1242, 1248, and 1260.  Because
only  one,  three,  and  three specimens  of approximately  2400  specimens
were positive for the three aroclors respectively, they are not included
in the  table.   The percent detected is highest in 1975 and 1976, lowest
in 1978  and  between the two extremes in 1980.  Table 3.6 summarizes the
levels of  the positive values  of PCB and Aroclor 1254 found in surface
water.  The  reader is  cautioned that the extreme value of 900 ppb found
in  the spring  of  1976  was measured  before  adequate quality  control
procedures were  implemented in  the  spring of  1977  (Yonan,  1982).   The
next  highest  value is  only 23 ppb  of Aroclor  1254 also found  in the
spring of  1976.   There is no apparent trend or seasonal patterns in the
levels of the two PCB measures.

     Sediment was  also  analyzed for PCB and  Aroclors  1242,  1248,  1254,
and  1260.  Because only three specimens contained detectable  levels of
1248, its  prevalence and levels are excluded from the summaries.  Table
3.7  summarizes  the prevalence  of  PCBs  found in  sediment  by  season and
year.  The percentage  of specimens with detectable  amounts  are  highest
in 1975 and tend to decline to the lowest prevalence  in 1979 with Aroclor
1254 consistently the most prevalent.  The levels of  the positive values
displayed  in Table  3.8 do  not exihibit a  declining pattern like  the
prevalence.   Aroclor  1254 tends to  be  the highest  of  the compounds as
well as the most prevalent.  The reader is advised to cautiously interpret
high values observed before the summer of 1977.  Adequate quality control
measures were not implemented until June of 1977 (Yonan, 1982).
                                    -11-

-------
    Table 3.5  Summary of the Prevalence of Polychlorinated Biphenyls
               in Surface Water
Calendar
Year
1975




1976




1977




1978




1979




1980





Quarter
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall

Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall

Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall

Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall

Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall

Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall

PCB
Sample Size
32
141
99
124
396
126
116
78
2
322
4
1
13
8
26
21
31
25
2
79
1
17
92
0
110
0
0
0
0
0

PD*
12.5
35.5
16.2
12.1

15.9
10.3
0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0
0.0







Aroclor
Sample Size
0
4
0
3
7
6
40
143
140
329
140
140
145
143
568
124
135
143
133
535
146
151
142
152
591
116
98
135
65
414
1254
PD*

50.0

33.3

33.3
32.5
4.2
4.3

1.4
5.7
0.7
1.4

0.8
0.0
0.0
.8

0.0
0.0
5.6
0.0

0.9
2.0
9.6
4.6

*The percent detected (PD) is the number of specimens with greater than
.15 parts per billion concentration divided by the sample size.

Source:   Calculated by the Research Triangle Institute from the NSWMP
          computer accessible data files.
                                    -12-

-------
                   Table 3.6  Summary of Positive Values of Polychlorinated
                              Biphenyls in Surface Water
Calendar
Year
1975



1976



1977



1978



1979



1980




Quarter
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall
Winter
Spring
Summer
Fall

Number
4
50
16
15
20
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PCB (ppb*)
Minimum Median Maximum Number
0.18 0.35 2.65
0.15 0.26 2.44 2
0.15 0.21 0.28
0.15 0.22 0.49 1
0.15 0.20 1.15 2
0.15 0.34 900. OOt 13
6
6
2
8
1
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
8
0
1
2
13
3
Aroclor
Minimum

0.15

0.99
0.38
0.15
0.15
0.16
0.23
0.15
0.24
0.23
0.22


21.43


0.15

0.18
0.26
0.17
0.28
1254 (ppb*)
Median

0.20

0.99
0.45
0.96
0.50
0.46
3.15
0.15
0.24
0.24
0.22


21.33


0.28

0.18
0.32
0.74
0.37

Maximum

0.25

0.99
0.51
23.00
2.08
1.28
6.06
0.16
0.24
0.24
0.22


21.43


0.47

0.18
0.37
3.78
17.29
*ppb denotes parts per billion.

tlhis high value needs to be interpreted cautiously because it was observed
before adequate quality control procedures were implemented in the Spring of
1977.

Source:   Calculated by the Research Triangle Institute from the NSWMP
          computer accessible data fiels.
                                              -13-

-------
              Table 3.7  Summary of the Prevalence of Polychlorinated
                         Bipbenyls in Bottom Sediment
PCB


Calendar
Year
1975


1976


1977


1978


1979


Quarter
Spring
Fall

Spring


Spring
Fall

Spring
Fall

Spring
Fall

1242
Sample
Size
60
96
156
93
4
97
3
20
23
17
3
"20
53
1
~54

PD*
58.3
47.9

8.6
0.0

0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0

0.0
0.0

Sample
Size
7
1
8
100
88
188
110
101
211
101
86
187
97
86
183

PD*
71.4
100.0

7.0
2.3

6.4
7.9

5.9
7.0

2.1
0.0

Aroclors
1254
Sample
Size
26
39
~65
101
90
191
110
101
211
101
86
187
97
86
183

PD*
92.3
97.4

22.8
25.6

17.3
19.8

18.8
19.8

8.3
8.1

1260
Sample
Size
4
2
~5
100
89
189
110
101
211
101
86
187
97
86
183

PD*
50.0
100.0

6.0
1.1

1.8
5.0

1.0
4.7

0.0
1.2

*The percent detected (PD) is the number of specimens greater than 1.5 ppb divided by
the sample size.

Source:   Calculated by the Research Triangle Institute from the NSWMP computer
          accessible data files.
                                          -14-

-------
                              Table 3.8  Summary of Positive Values of Polycblorinated Biphenyls in Bottom Sediment
Calendar
Tear Quarter
1975 Spring
Fall
1976
1977
i 1978
i-
Ol
i
1979
Spring
Fall
Spring
Fall
Spring
Fall
Spring
Fall
PCB (pbb*) Aroclor 1242 (ppb*)
Number
35
66
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Minimum Hedian Maximum Number
1.61 4.82 73.25 5
1.50 5.49 457.8 1
2.14 14.37 164.0 7
2
7
8
6
6
2
0
Minimum
13.45
1.80
6.00
136.98
42.19
2.01
12.52
11.38
75.75
Median
70.50
1.80
12.24
805.99
117.69
30.76
80.42
35.17
326.88
Maximum
610.46
1.80
28.10
1475
188.06
88.77
2969
331.62
578.00
Aroclor 1254 (ppb*)
Number
24
38
23
23
19
20
19
17
8
7
Minimum
2.08
1.54
1.80
2.84
4.80
1.67
1.82
1.60
2.35
1.70
Median
9.08
4.26
9.72
12.11
24.13
5.70
9.64
10.57
16.25
2.80
Maximum
256.21
46.54
1388
641
2064
2440
1752
88.00
130.6
7.30
Aroclor 1260 (ppb*)
Number
2
2
4
1
2
5
1
4
0
1
Minimum
37.94
1.74
37.00
15.48
5.71
2.63
44.33
27.43
3.73
Median
55.47
8.59
62.26
15.48
12.90
14.30
44.33
46.99
3.73
Maximum
73.00
15.44
708.0
15.48
20.08
49.38
44.33
1053
3.73
*ppb denotes parts per billion.




Source:   Calculated by the Research Triangle Institute from the NSWMP computer accessible data files.

-------
4.   POLYCHLORINATED BIPHENYLS IN FRESHWATER FISH

     4.1  General Description of the Study

          Since  1967,  the Fish and Wildlife  Service  (USDI)  has sampled
fresh water  fishes  at about 100 selected geographic stations throughout
the Nation as a part of the National Pesticide Monitoring Program (NPMP).
The sampled fishes have been analyzed for selected organochlorine pesti-
cides and  other contaminants,  including PCBs  and  various  toxic metals.
A  description  of  the program design  (which  has  undergone  significant
changes  since  its  inception)  and  the  analytical procedures  used are
presented in Schmitt et al (1982).

     4.2  Overview of the Study Design

          Among  the  112 active NPMP stations,  fish were collected from
109  stations  located  throughout  the  United  States.   Specimens  were
collected at  about  half the stations in even-numbered  years and at the
other half in odd-numbered years.  Collections were made at  106 stations
in the  1976-1977  two-year cycle, 108 stations in the 1978-1979 two-year
cycle, and 102 stations yielded data in both two-year collection cycles.
This 102-station subset of data from both years contained 591 specimens,
which represents  95  percent of the  1976-1979  data.   Collaborators were
instructed to collect three specimens at each site; two of a representa-
tive bottom-feeding species, and one of a representative predator species.
Each specimen was composed of three to five whole,  adult fish.  Aliquots
of the ground whole fish were subjected to electron-capture gas chromato-
graphy to measure  residues  of  the selected organochlorine contaminants.

     4.3  Statistical Limitation of Data

          Summary of descriptive statistics including means,  minimum and
maximum concentrations, and percent of stations at which PCS residue was
detected are  presented in  Schmitt  et al  (1982).   Concentration levels
for  PCBs  in  the  different fish  species  collected at  each  of  the 109
individual stations are presented on both a wet-weight and a lipid-weight
basis.  The material  that was  available for this report, especially the
description of how the monitoring stations were selected, was not suffi-
ciently detailed to evaluate fully the data limitations for generalizing
results  (statistical  inferences).  Hence,  before  claiming  the  results
apply to  some particular population,  say  all  fresh  water  fish in the
U.S.,  the  underlying  methodology should  be  reviewed  in more  detail.
However, because  102  stations  were common between the two collection
periods, comparing changes in the descriptive statistics between the two
periods is meaningful.

     4.4  Summary of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Freshwater Fish Data

          Table 4.1  contains a  summary  of the  levels  of total PCS in
freshwater fish measured  from  the 109 stations of the survey.  Mean and
maximum values for wet weight and lipid weight of PCB and percent occur-
rence of residue concentrations for the two collection periods 1976-1977
and 1978-1979 are also given.  In general,  PCB residues were more widely
distributed in  the  latter period,  but appeared to be  declining in some
                                    -16-

-------
   Table A.I  Summary of Polychlorinated Biphenyls in Freshwater Fish"
Wet Weight
Mean
Maximum
Lipid Weight
Mean
Maximum
•irk
Percent Occurrence
Total
1976-1977

0.87
70.60

7.99
738.61
91.5
PCB M8/G
1978-1979

0.84
92.77

8.79
483.17
98.1
 *
  Source: Summarized by the Research Triangle Institute from the
          data provided by Schmitt et al. (1982).

•irk
  Percent of stations showing detectable residues in at least one sample.
                                    -17-

-------
areas  of  high concentration.   The  less-chlorinated PCBs  (resembling
Aroclor  1242)  seem  to be  disappearing.  The  occurrence of  PCBs  were
found at 92  percent  of the stations sampled in 1976-1977 and 98 percent
in 1978-1979.  Maximum concentration did not change appreciably.  Of the
four PCB  mixtures measured,  residues  resembling Aroclor  1254 were the
most widespread.
                                    -18-

-------
5.   SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

     5.1  Introduction

          In this  chapter,  an overview of the PCB data discussed in the
previous chapters is presented.  Because the designs of the sources were
not  matched,   (that  is,  collecting  specimens  from the  different media
within close geographic  proximity to each other), only general compari-
sons among  the media  by time  period  are feasible.   Even  this type of
comparison  is  limited  because  of  the  minimal  amount  of time  period
overlap among the available data from the media.   Figure 5.1 illustrates
the time periods of specimen collection by media.  Urban and rural soils
have the greatest amount of overlap, approximately six years.   The other
media studies overlap by three to five years.

     5.2  Comparisons Among Media

          The  urban  soil network  data  does not exhibit  any  trends and
the prevalence  (percent detected)  is  relatively low  in  all  years.  Of
course,  the limitation of  the  survey  design  may preclude  detecting
trends even if they exist.   The rural soil network data show essentially
no PCB contamination (only 2 positives out of 6093 observations in round
one) in cropland soil.

     The prevalence of  PCBs  in the water and  sediment network data are
higher than in the  soils  data.  The  prevalence appear  to decrease in
both water  and  sediment:   that  is,  the later  years  (1978,   1979,  and
1980) tend to have lower percents detected than the earlier years (1975,
1976, and 1977).

     The percents  detected for  PCBs  in the  tissue of  freshwater  fish
were higher in  the  1978-1979  time period than  in the  1976-1977  time
period (98.1 percent  as compared with 91.5 percent)  indicating similar
levels of prevalence in fish and humans.

     Two general patterns  appear to exist among the media.  The preval-
ence of PCBs appears  to be increasing in freshwater  fish tissues.   The
prevalence in the environmental media is  lower and appears to  be constant
or decreasing.   These two conflicting patterns may possibly be explained
by the chemical properties  of PCBs.  PCBs tend to be soluble in organics
and  insoluble  in  water.   Hence,  they  tend to  migrate  into   the lipid
portions of tissues  and  remain but tend to be  less persistant in other
media.
                                    -19-

-------
        Figure 5.1  Diagram of Collection Time Periods of Polychlorinated  Biphenyl  Data by Media
Urban Soil Network

Rural Soil Network
Surface Water and                                             	wat^r	
Sediment Survey                                               	sediment
Fresh Water Fish
                    68    69    70    71     72    73    74     75     76     77     78     79    80    81    82

                                                       Calendar Year
     Source:  Developed by the Research Triangle Institute  from  information provided by the U.S.  Environmental
              Protection Agency

-------
6.   REFERENCES
McDonald M, Hardy M, Drummond D  1981.   National Soil Monitoring Program:
Urban  Soils  Monitoring Network.  Research Triangle  Park,  NC:   Research
Triangle Institute.  RTI/1864/14/03-02I.

Whitmore R,  Rosenzweig  M,  and Hines J   1981.   National  Soil Monitoring
Program.   Research  Triangle Park,  NC:   Research  Triangle  Institute.
RTI/1864/14/03-011.

USDA 1966.  National Handbook for Updating the Conservation Needs Inven-
tory United States Department of Agriculture.

USEPA  1979.   Analysis of EPA Pesticides  Monitoring  Networks.   Prepared
by the  Research  Triangle  Institute for the  Office of Toxic Substances,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Washington, DC.  EPA-560/13-79-014.

USGA  1980.   National  Water Data  Exchange.   U.S.   Geological  Survey.
Reston, Virginia.

Lucas  D,  Mason RE,  Rosenzweig  M et al.  1980.  Recommendations  for the
National  Surface  Water Monitoring  Program  for  Pesticides.   Research
Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC  27709.  RTI/1864/14/01-01I.

Schmitt,  CJ,  Ludke, JL and Walsh, D  1981.   Organochlorine residues in
fish,   1970-1974,  National  Pesticide  Monitoring  Program.   Pesticide
Monitoring Journal 14(4):  136«-206.

Schmitt,  CJ, M  A Ribick,  JL Ludke,  and  TW May  1982.   Organochlorine
Residues  in  Freshwater Fish, 1976-1979:   National  Pesticide Monitoring
Program.  J.  in press, Pesticide Monitoring Journal.

Yonan, J  1982  Personal communication on August 25,  1982.
                                    -21-

-------