bulletin
/I.
 EPA Policy News/
 Recent Events/
 Coming Events/
 Special Bulletin Report/
 Status of the Program/ f
 Employment Needs/
 Approved Designation
 and Regional Contacts/
 References/
        April 1975
        United States
 Environmental Protection Agency

          OFFICE OF
   WAFER AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
     DIVISION OF WATER PLANNING

      Wcuhmglon D C 20460
                              Report on
                              Areawide Designation and Planning
      To date, 45 agencies have been desig-
 nated,, and 14 agencies have received their
 gran-tsVfor the planning process of areawide
 waste' treatment management.  Names and
2 locations are listed in a status section.  We
 ^xpexit to add many more agencies by the end
. of  the fiscal year.

  - /  ""Tne 100 percent Federal funding provided
 by  Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution
 Control Act of 1972 may be reduced in Fiscal
 Year 1976.  Thus, we are focusing at this
 time on the processes of designation and work
 plan development to help agencies to receive
 grants before the end of June.

      We plan to keep you informed on major
 policy changes, and other HQ announcements,
 technical assistance services available, and
 significant comment on important planning
 issues.  We also plan to announce newly
 designated areas, and reference material to
 furnish guidance in the planning process and
 procedure, including availability and source
 of  supply.

      The need to fill the growing number of
 specialized positions is well recognized,
 as  208 agencies increase.  We, therefore,
 will try to  facilitate contact between
 aaencies and qualified individuals.

      As planning agency programs progress,
 we  intend to pass on to those involved  in
 the planning process any anency experiences
 deemed useful.  Although every planning  area
  is  unique, we  feel  there will be enough
  functional  similarities for  shared experiences,
  in  order  to  imnrove  the chances for rapid
  implementation, and  to establish effective
 continuing  planning.
                           Mark  A.  Pisano
                      Director of Water  Planning

-------
                        EPA POLICY  NEWS


 QUICK ACTION  NEEDED  ON  208
 AREA  AND AGENCY  DESIGNATIONS!


      The end  of  Fiscal  Year 1975 is  only  three  months  away
 This  marks  the end of a clear Congressional  commitment to
 provide funding  for  208 planning activities  at  100  percent
 of  their costs.  While  we  expect additional  funds will be
 available after  June 30, the percentage of the  Federal share
 and the total amount that  will be  available  is  not  yet clear.

      We urge  quick action  on area  and agency designations and
 completion  of work plans,  so that  grant applications can be
 quickly approved.  Our  regional offices are  ready to assist you
 with  these  tasks.  Moreover, the handbooks and  films described
 in  the "Events"  section of this bulletin  offer  additional guidance
 We  must remind you that the States must assume  responsibility for
 meeting Section  208 requirements for all  areas  that are not
 designated.  We  have high  expectations for agencies that have
 received their grants.

      Section 208 presents  an unusual opportunity.  The quality of
 our environmental future depends heavily  on  the quality of our
 plans and the actions they guide.


 EFFECTIVE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ESSENTIAL
 FOR 208 SUCCESS!


     The success  or failure of areawide water quality manage-
ment depends upon the understanding and support of local
communities.  The agencies  and officials involved with 208
planning are responsible for creating effective programs.
Guidelines  already published in the Federal Register (40 CFR 105)
stress the  need for public  participation in designating areas  and
agencies,  in developing  work plans, in management programs,  and
in statewide implementation plans.

     Establish a  good program according to these minimal rules:

     -Develop  a public  information  program as soon as  possible.

     -Be  sure  this  information  includes  water quality  data and
      other pertinent information.

     -Provide  technical  and information  assistance to  public
      groups for  citizen education, community workshops,
      training, and  dissemination of information to  communities.

-------
     -Permit interested individuals to communicate directly with
      the officials and designers who make critical decisions.

     -Develop and maintain lists of individuals who want
      information on a regular basis.

     -If the state agency's procedures are less stringent,
      follow EPA regulations on procedures for public
      participation.

     -Conduct public meetings to stimulate interest.

     -When public interest is in doubt, resolve the issue
      through public involvement or, if necessary, provide
      alternatives.

     -Give the public at least 30 days' notice prior to
      meetings.  Prepare detailed fact sheets on the issues
      involved.

     -Allow for public comment before negotiating any
      settlement concerning a pollution source.

     -Develop procedures to consider evidence submitted
      by the public.


     These measures ensure that those affected by 208 planning
have an opportunity to become involved.  In the next bulletin
we will present some imaginative, successful solutions to
public participation, based on conversations with planning
agencies around the country.


                        RECENT EVENTS

AREA AND AGENCY DESIGNATION WORK PLAN HANDBOOKS AVAILABLE


     EPA has completed the first two of several handbooks on
elements of the 208 Program to assist agencies in meeting Federal
requirements.  The first,  Area and Agency Designation Handbook
for Section 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning, was
published in December 1974.  A second handbook, Preparation of
Work Plans, was published this February.  Copies are available
from EPA regional offices or from the EPA Office of Public Affairs,
Waterside Mall, (A-107), Washington, D.C. 20460.  Other handbooks,
to be completed by early summer, will cover:  evaluation of interim
planning outputs; evaluation of final plans; and management of
plan implementation.

-------
     These handbooks supplement the regulations by presenting
expanded guidance, and are designed to help prepare the
documents.  For example, the Designation Handbook includes
the kind of data presentation and evaluation EPA seeks in
requests from Governors.  Moreover, the handbooks assist EPA
in setting quality standards used to evaluate the development
and implementation of areawide plans.  The Designation
Handbook also describes a screening process to assist State
governors and EPA in establishing the water quality problem
for area designation.


TWO EPA FILMS ON 208 AVAILABLE

     EPA has produced two films on the 208 designation process
and work plan development.  The films feature discussions by
John R. Quarles, EPA Deputy Administrator, James L. Agee, EPA
Assistant Administrator for Water and Hazardous Materials,
Mark Pisano, Director, Water Planning Division, and directors of
ongoing 208 programs.  Panel participants include Ms. Merna Hurd,
Newark, Delaware, Stephen Dice, Hampton Roads, Virginia, James
Barresi, Caribou, Maine, Richard Heikka, Lake Tahoe, California-
Nevada, and Frank Lamm, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, a member
of the EPA 208 Advisory Board.

     The film on the designation process describes how an area
and agency can receive an EPA designation, and includes the
effects of 208 planning on institutional change, land use
controls, and the 201 facilities program.  In the Work Plan
film, the panelists discuss realities of Work Plan development.
Using illustrations based on their experiences, they describe
each of the nine major items which must be covered in the Work
Plan.  ,We anticipate that the films will be useful to planners
in all stages of the planning process.  The EPA Administrator's
Office mailed announcements to approximately 1,300 planning
agencies and government officials.  The films are being distributed
by Modern Talking Picture Service, 2323 New Hyde Park Road,
New Hyde Park, New York 11040.


                        COMING EVENTS
CONFERENCES ON 208 FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERS

     The American Consulting Engineers Council, in conjunction
with EPA is sponsoring a series of 208 seminars.  These seminars
will include EPA headquarters personnel, EPA regional personnel,

-------
 and members of the Corps of Engineers Urban Studies Program
 The proposed agenda will include 208 Program goals and policies
 the relationship between 208 planning and other environmental
 planning efforts, the Corps of Engineers Urban Studies program
 the 208 Program planning sequence, and other topics relevant to
 the 208 planning process.

      The first session was held in Philadelphia on March 26. '
 Other sessions are tentatively scheduled for Chicago,  Denver
 Dallas, Atlanta, and San Francisco during April and May.   For
 information, contact Mr. Larry Spiller,  American Consulting
 Engineers Council, 1155 15th Street,  N.W.,  Washington, D.C. 20005.


 MEETINGS WITH 208 PLANNING AGENCIES

      A second series of EPA-sponsored /meetings  with 208 areawide
 planning agency personnel and interested State  representatives
 will  be held in Washington,  D.C.  (Apr/il  2-3,  1975), New Orleans,
 Louisiana (April  17-18,  1975),  and S,an Francisco,  California
 (April 24-25,  1975).   Major  agenda topics will  center  around work
 plan  development,  grant  application' requirements,  cost analysis
 ^  one latest  EPA Policies  and technical guidance for implementing
 the 208 program.                                          *         &


                    SPECIAL BULLETIN REPORT


 AREAWIDE WATER  MANAGEMENT UNDER SECTION  208"
 THE DESIGNATION PROCESS  AND  WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT

 The Designation Process

     The  Federal Water Pollution Control  Act sets  target  dates
 for completing  specific  improved water quality goals.  By
 1977,  the Act requires significant  reduction in "point" source
 discharges -- that is, effluent coming from an identifiable
 D°Ufo!;  SUuh as a municiPal  sewage  system or an industrial outfall
 By  1983,  the goal is to have water  clean  enough to  swim in and
 support high-level aquatic life.  This requires more than just
 controlling point sources.

     EPA has concentrated first on  a permit system  to control
 and monitor discharges, and on a construction grants program to
 build necessary sewage treatment plants  around the country.

     However, some water quality problems, particularly from
non-point sources, are so complex that many  solutions require
new approaches.   The 208 Program calls for areawide water  quality

-------
management.  Municipalities sharing common water  resources and
common problems can use Federal funds to set up a management
process at a regional level, and cooperate to find solutions.
This is a continuing process and.eventually will be used to set
up a long-term plan for each area.

     Solutions to non-point source problems may be harder to
achieve, and will probably require changes in community develop-
ment plans.  It may be necessary to consider alternative land
development patterns to obtain both water quality and other
community goals.

     The 208 planning process also enables regional areas to
coordinate water quality planning with planning for other EPA
programs and those of other Federal agencies which impact
water quality.   EPA air quality, solid waste disposal, and
hazardous materials control programs can be carried out more
effectively if each program goal is integrated with other
goals.   For example, the Volumes of sludge generated by new
treatment plants should be handled according to EPA solid
waste disposal guidelines and ambient air pollution control
guidelines for incineration.

     Ideally, the 208 Program will enable each area to use  its
Federal money more effectively and to develop plans that work
not studies that gather dust.                                 '

     Role of the Federal Government.   EPA has three specific
     tasks to perform to help you  achieve your goals:   Interpret
     the Act with guidelines and regulations; allocate funding
     to get the planning done;  and the ability to  assist you
     if any conflicts  arise in meeting 208  requirements.

     Several interpretive documents are  available,  including
     Guidelines,  Regulations,  Executive  Summary  of the Guide-
     lines,  Designation and Work Plan Handbooks, and materials
     from the National  Association of Regional  Councils. These
     are available from your regional  EPA office.

     To assist  you with funding,  $150  million have been
     allocated  for Fiscal Year 1975.   This  is designed to
     cover 100  percent  of your planning  costs for  two  years.
     Finally,  to  help  coordinate 208  goals  with  other  Federal
     programs,  we  can  assist you directly if  your  problems  can
     best be solved in  Washington.

     The 208 Program assists you by presenting a framework  within
     which you  can define the  problems in your area, and implement
     their solutions.   Metropolitan areas with heavy industrial
     concentrations  are  obvious  candidates  for planning  funds.
     In addition,  there  are non-metropolitan  areas which suffer
     from complex  problems  that  can best  be solved on  an areawide
     basis.

-------
Maintaining a unique waterway for prime recreation also
qualifies for designation under the 208 Program.  Areas
where water quality may be diminished because of natural
resources development for new energy needs also qualify.
These include eastern coal mining regions, and new regions
in the West facing water pollution from oil shale or coal
development.

Area Designation.  Although the Governor of each State
should take the leadership in designating areas, area
officials who wish to quality for the 208 Program should
contact the Governor or the State water pollution control
authority to petition for consideration.  However, the
Governor may decide to take no action.  In this case, the
chief elected officials in local areas may act on their
own, and can apply directly to EPA for designation.

In addition, a Governor can "non-designate" a potential
area, but still reserves  the option of designating it
later.  His action, however, prevents local self-
designations.  By his action, the Governor assumes the
responsibility for State  planning on an areawide scale,
without benefit of Federal 208 funds.

The  Planning Agency must  include local elected  officials,
must have the resources and technical ability to develop
an effective and  implementable plan, and  must meet certain
criteria  regarding representation of local officials,  staff
capabilities, and jurisdictional authority.   In brief,  the
Agency must have  specific legislative authority to carry
out  the work.

The  designated  area must  demonstrate  that it  has  the
acceptance  and  cooperation of  the  local  governments
who  will  participate.   This  cooperation  is evidenced
by  presenting  "Resolutions of  Intent"  from each
official  with  a  vital  role in  determining the  outcome
 of  the  work plan.   The  work  plan will  not be  easily
 implemented without  full  participation  and support
 from municipalities.

 If  a State  chooses to  non-designate  an area,  it must
 either certify  that no water quality problem exists, or
 it  must assume  the responsibility  for seeing that planning
 is  conducted and that  planned actions  are implemented.
 The law clearly indicates that the States are responsible
 for conducting areawide planning in non-designated areas.
 If the State chooses not to perform this work under the
 auspices of Section 208 it must nontheless satisfy the
 requirement.

-------
                                                    8
This, then, is the process, and the criteria which EPA
is using for Section 208.  However, this brief statement
does not answer all the questions which you may have about
the program.  For a fuller discussion of the issues, we
direct you to the written materials available from your
EPA regional office.

Major questions regarding area designation usually fall
in the following categories:  institutional change; land
use controls; facilities construction plans; and funding
and timing.

-Institutional Change

There is concern that existing institutions will be
radically changed and the balance of powers between
state and local governments will be upset by a new
regional layer of government.

This is not the case.  Our emphasis is on plan implemen-
tation.  Where existing institutions have the required
authority and resources to carry out the plan, implemen-
tation might only be delayed by imposing a totally new
organization.  We urge you to work through existing
institutions where such institutions form a practicable
and efficient base.  However, when 208 planning reveals
the need for planning or operational functions that are
not being adequately addressed by existing groups, new
institutions will be needed.
-Land Use Controls

Some people are concerned that land use planning and
control authority will be taken away from local
government units and given to the areawide 208 agency,

This is not the case.  The primary 208 function would
require both the planning agency and the local munici-
palities to reexamine the land use plans in the area
and test them for their compatibility with achieving
water quality objectives.
-Facilities Construction Plans

There is concern that planning and construction of
new treatment facilities will be delayed until the
208 plan has been completed and approved.

This is not the case.  Planning developed under 208
will Lay the groundwork for all future construction
of new treatment facilities.  Construction of treat-

-------
     ment works, however, will continue as scheduled during
     the period in which the initial 208 plan is being developed,


     -Funding and Timing

     Some people are concerned that funding and time
     requirements are inadequate to achieve Section 208 goals.

     The intent of the Act is quite clear that after
     designation, a one-year period is allowed for Work
     Plan development and two years are available for plan
     implementation - a total of up to three years from
     designation'.  Current procedures require that funds
     cannot be obligated until a satisfactory grant
     application, including work plan, is approved.  Limit
     your plans to tasks that can be implemented within the
     two-year period.

     Full funding is available for designated areas that
     have received approval of their grant application
     before June 30, 1975.   EPA has full utilization of
     $150 million up to that date.


Work Plan Development

     After a planning agency has been designated,  a Work
Plan must be developed for the project.   Since much effort
is needed to achieve milestones according to a strict schedule,
plans must be completed within two years after a grant award
has been made.

     The Work Plan must define the requirements in detail, in
order to make an adequate estimate of the overall  cost of the
project.  As soon as your grant application,  including the
Work Plan, has been approved, initial disbursement can be made
on your grant.

     Informational materials are available from your regional
EPA office to assist you with the step-by-step procedure in
developing a Work Plan.   An EPA staff is available to answer
specific questions.

     A Work Plan has the following nine  sections.

     -Objectives and Scope;
     -Work Performed to  Date;
     -Coordination with  Other Agencies;
     -The Planning Process;
     -Detailed Schedules;
     -Resource Budget;                 ,
     -Disbursement and Milestone  Schedule;

-------
                                                10
 •Compabibility with Other Plans; and
 •Public Participation.
Objectives and Scope

The key to an effective 208 planning process is concen-•
trating on a manageable number of water quality problems
where plans can be made and implemented within the two-
year period.  The objectives of the planning process
should be output-oriented'.

Work Performed to Date

Wherever designation is feasible, use past studies that
apply to present projects.  Collecting and analyzing new
data is costly and time-consuming.

Coordination With Other Agencies

EPA encourages active participation with other agencies
in the planning process--particularly if they have their
own resources and can contribute to the Work Plan.  Guard
against slipped milestones by ensuring that your Work Plan
includes written evidence attesting to the competence of
other agencies.

The Planning Process

The Work Plan lists all of the major tasks that are
scheduled to fit into the two-year period.  As soon
as the task descriptions and schedules are defined,
they can be matched with your available resources.

Detailed Schedules

It is important that priorities and expectations for
accomplishments are expressed in concrete terms of
resource allocation, and that priorities be matched
with the objectives and scope of the plan.

Resource Budget

Although this is a relatively straightforward task, it
is time-consuming if every line item is opened up for
lengthy discussion.  Need for approving the grant is
the effort level distribution by task multiplied by an
average cost per unit of time.

-------
                                                       11
     Disbursement and Milestone Schedule

     The disbursement schedule has been designed to minimize
     cash flow problems for the planning agency.  An advance
     payment is replenished quarterly as progress is made.
     EPA regional offices monitor the achievement of milestones
     by evaluating quarterly reports as the project progresses.

     Compatibility With Other Plans

     The 201 facilities plans, the basin plans made by the
     States under Section 303(e), and the water resource
     planning provided by Section 209 must be considered as
     a part of the 208 planning process.  Avoid duplication
     of effort, and indicate the role of other planning
     activities in the implementation plan.

     Public Participation

     Public representatives, and their interest groups must
     be involved in order to make meaningful inputs throughout
     the planning process.
Summary

     Areawide planning is not the result of a one-shot plan.
The objectives are to start a planning process that will
continue long after immediate requirements are met.

                    STATUS OF THE PROGRAM

1.  Designations and Agencies Approved by EPA Administrator
    (Attachment 1).

2.  EPA Regional Contacts (Attachment 2).

3.  Bibliography for Areawide Water Quality Management
    Planning (Attachment 3).
                      EMPLOYMENT NEEDS

EMPLOYMENT NEEDS:  AN EXCHANGE

     EPA headquarters has received requests from 208 agencies
and EPA regional offices for the names of potential employees
to work on the 208 programs.  Individuals have also sent in
resumes and inquired regarding positions.  EPA will forward
all names and resumes to the regional offices for distribution

-------
                                                           L2


to 208 agencies in their region.  It is suggested that all 208
agencies contact their local regional offices and place position
openings with them.  EPA can help you by publishing your partic-
ular employment opportunity in this bulletin.  Let us know if
this would be helpful.


POSITIONS AVAILABLE

    -Water Quality Specialist/Sanitary Engineer--Assist in
     the development of a two-year 208 Areawide Waste Treatment
     Management Plan for the Willamette River drainage basin of
     Lane County,  including metropolitan Eugene-Springfield.
     Requires education, experience and working knowledge in
     water resource engineering or sanitary science.   Ability to
     communicate and coordinate concepts with local,  state and
     federal planning and engineering professionals as necessary.
     Salary to $17,500, depending upon education  and experience.
     Closing date  for applications is May 1.   Send resume to
     L.  Douglas Halley, Executive Director, Lane  Council of
     Governments,  135 Sixth Avenue East, Eugene,  Oregon 97401.

    -Civil Engineer—Master's Degree with emphasis in Sanitary
     Engineering preferred; or B.S.  degree with two years'
     relevant experience.  Duties to include  working  with a
     highly specialized team in developing a  208  Areawide Waste
     Treatment Plan for the Birmingham SMSA (approximate population
     750,000).  Salary dependent upon qualifications.  Submit
     detailed resume and salary requirements  to:   Douglas M.  Maddock,
     Director of Planning,  Birmingham Regional Planning Commission,
     Suite 220, 2112 llth Avenue South, Birmingham, Alabama 35205.
REFERENCES

1.  Interim Grant Regulations, Areawide Waste Treatment
    Management Planning Agencies, Federal Register
    Monday, May 13, 1974, Volume 39, Number 93, Part IV.

2.  Rules and Regulations, Areawide Waste Treatment
    Management Planning Areas and Responsible Plannino
    Agencies, Federal Register, Volume 38, Number 178°
    Friday, September 14, 1973, Part 126.

3.  Draft Guidelines for Areawide Waste Treatment
    Management,  U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
    Washington,  D.C. 20460,  May 1974.

4.  Executive Summary of Section 208 Program for Designated
    Areas  Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments
    ot 1972,  U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency
    Washington,  D.C. 20460,  October 1974.

-------
                                                       13
5.  Area and Agency Designation Handbook For Section 208
    Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning, U.S.
    Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
    20460, December 1974.

6.  Flyer - Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning,
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, November 1974.

7.  Final Agreement (Corps of Engineers), Water Quality
    Programs and Implementation Plans, Federal Register,
    Thursday, January 16, 1975, Volume 40, Number 11.
    Part III.

8.  The Challenge and Opportunity to Water Quality
    Management Planning,  National Association of Regional
    Councils, 1700 K Street,  N.W., Washington, D.C.  20006,
    August 1974.

-------
                     Current Status of 208 Program
As of April 1, 1975 the following forty-five(U5) areas and agency designa-
tions have been approved by the Administrator, Environmental Protection
Agency:
Region and Area
  Date of
Designation
Agency
Princ ipal
 Contact
Region I

Portland, Maine
Southern Maine
6-25-71*      Greater Portland
             Council of
             Governments
             169A Ocean Street
             Portland, Maine OUlo6

7-26-71*      Southern Maine
             Regional Planning
             Commission
             York County Courthouse
             Alfred, Maine  OU002
Northern Maine
8-5-71*
Lewiston-Auburn, Me.  12-19-71*
Augusta-Cobbosse, Me. 12-19-71*
Berkshire County
Pittsfield, Mass.
                       Mr. Rich  Hubbel
                         207-799-8523
                       Mr. Dave  Crawford
                        207-32^-2952
Northern Maine Reg.
Planning Comm.
McElwaine House
2 Maine Street
Caribou, Maine 0^736

Androscoggin  Valley
Regional Planning
Commission
3k Court Street
Auburn, Maine  OU210

Southern Kennebec
Regional Planning
Commission
151* State Street
Augusta, Maine  0^330
2-19-75      Berkshire County
             Regional Planning
             Commission
             Ken Fern Street
             Pittsfield, Mass.  01201
Mr. Jeff Gammon
 207-^98-8736
                                    Mr. Richard Darling
                                     207-781*-0151
                                    Mr. John Forster
                                     207-622-71U6
                       Mr. Carl Heckler
                        IH3-UU2-1521
                                                        Attachment 1

-------
Region and Area
  Date of
Designation  Agency
                       Principal
                        Contact
Region I

Cape Cod.,  Mass
Martha's Vineyard,
Mass.
Lowell, Mass.
Old Colony
Brockton, Mass.
Region III

New Castle County,
Delaware
Hampton Roads, Va.
Roanoke, Virginia
2-27-75
2-27-75
3-U-75
3-6-75
6-12-71*
6-25-71*
Cape Cod Planning      Mr. Wm. Burlin
& Economic Develop-     617-362-2511
ment Commission
First District
Courthouse
Barnstable, Mass. 02630

Martha's Vineyard Land Ms. Rebecca Zanditon
& Water Commission      617-693-3^53
Bo* ikhj
Oak Bluffs, Mass. 02557
Northern Middlesed
Area Commission
ihh Merrimac Street
Lowell, Mass.  01852

Old Colony Planning
Council
232 Main Street
Brockton, Mass. 02U01
                       Mr. Jos. Hannah
                       Mr. Daniel Crane
                        617-583-1833
New Castle County      Mrs. Myrna Herd
Council of Governments  302-731-7670
Office of Water/Sewer
Mgmt.
2701 Capitol Trail
Newark, Delaware 19711
Hampton Roads Water
Quality Agency
P.O. Box Tiki
Norfolk, Va. 23510

5th Planning District
Comm.
P.O. Box 2527
1^5 West Campbell Ave.
Roanoke, Va. 2^010
                                    Mr. Wm. J. Love
                       Mr. Charles
                         Haeussler
                        703-3U3-M17
                                                       Attachment .1

-------
Region and Area
                        Date of
                      Designation
Agency
Principal
 Contact
Region III

Richmond, Virginia
                      6-25-7^
FrederickslDurg, Va.   1-7-75
Sussex County, Del.



Southwest Virginia




Region IV

Raleigh-Durham, N.C
                      1-30-75
                      1-30-75
Richmond-Crater        Mr. Harold
Consortium               Butterworth
C/0 Richmond Regional   80^-526-5700
Planning District
Commi ssion
301* Sherwood Street
Hopewell, Va  23860

Pappahannock Area      Mr. Ronald Rebman
Development Commission  80*1-373-2890
(RADCO)
913 Charles Street
Fredericksburg, Va. 22U01
Sussex County Govt.
P.O. Box 507
Georgetown, Del. 199^7

Plateau & Leno^isco
Planning District Comm.
U.S. Highway 58-U21W
Duffield, Va.
                                   Triangle J. Council of
                                   Governments
                                   P.O. Box 12276
                                   Research Triangle Park, N.C.
                                    27709
Mr. William C. Henry
 302-856-7701 x2l6
Memphis, Tenn.
                      6-25-75
Knoxville, Tenn.
                      6-28-71*
Miss-Tenn-Ark COG/     Mr> Hugh Teaford
Memphis Delta Develop.  9Q1-53U-9775
District
125 No. Main Street
Memphis, Tenn.  38103
Knoxville-Knox
Counties Metro
Planning Agency
301 Locust Street
Knoxville, Tenn. 37902
Mr. Don Parnell
 615-52U-8618

-------
Region and Area
  Date of
Designation  Agency
                                                          Princ ipal
                                                           Contact
Region IV

Chattanooga, Tenn,
Nashville, Tenn.
Birmingham, Ala,
luscaloos-a, Ala.
 Columbia,  S.C.
10-10-T1*
11-11-71*
3-25-75
                       3-25-75
 3-25-75
                       Mr. Ron Sailer
                        615-266-5781
Chattanooga Area
Regional Council
of Governments
1413 James Bldg.
735 Broad Street
Chattanooga, Tenn. 37^02
                        •         I
Mid-Cumberland Council Mr. Larry Raybon
of Govts./Development   6l5-2UU-1212
District
Suite 801
226 Capitol Boulevard
Nashville, Tenn. 37219
Birmingham Regional
Planning Commission
21 Office Plaza South
2112 llth Ave., South
Birmingham, Ala. 35205

West Ala. Planning &
Development Council
P.O. Box 86
Tuscaloosa, Ala. 35**01

Central Midland
Regional Planning
Counc il
Dutch Plaza, Suite 55
800 Diitch. Square Blvd.
Columbia, S.C.  29210
                       Mr. Doug Maddock
                        205-325-3897
                                     Ms.  NancyLandgraf
                                      205-3i*5-55li5
                       Ms.  Nancy  Landgraf
                         205-3^5-55^5
 Region  V

 Palm  Beach  Co.,        1-10-75
 Florida
 Cincinnati,  Ohio      6-12-71!
              Planning  Board of
              Palm Beach  County
              P.O. Box  36^3
              West Palm Beach,  Fla.  33^02
                       Mr. Richard  Stalker
                        305-683-9^50
              Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana
              Regional  Council of
              Government s
              1+26 East  Uth Street
              Cincinnati, Ohio 1*5202
                       Mr. Dory Montazemi
                         513-621-7060
                                                           1-iv

-------
Region and Area
  Date of
Designation
Agency
Principal
 Contact
Region V

Toledo, Ohio
Dayton, Ohio
Youngstown, Ohio
Southeastern
Wisconsin
Region VI

Tulsa, Oklahoma




Oklahoma City
Region VII

Des Moines,  Iowa
6-25-71*
6-25-71*
6-28-7**
12-26-7U
10-25-71*
6-10-71*
Toledo Metropolitan     Mr.  Hintz
Area Council  of  Govts.    "usselman
1*20 Madison Ave.         1*19-21*1-9155
Suite 725
Toledo, Ohio  l»36ol*
Miami Valley Regional
Planning Commission
333 West First Street
Dayton, Ohio 1*51*02

Eastgate Development&
Transportation Agency
l6l6 Covington Street
Youngstown, Ohio 1*1+510
Mr. Roger Riga
 513-223-6323
Mr. Bill Fergus
 216-71*6-1*665
Southeastern Wisconsin Mr.  Kirk  Bower
Planning Comn. (SEWRPC) l*lU-5l*7-6721
916 N.E. Ave.
Waukesha, Wisconsin 53186
Indian Nations Council Mr. Jim Newby
of Governments          918-587-3178
630 West Seventh Street
Tulsa, Oklahoma 71*127

Assoc. of Central      Mr. Larry Goodman
Oklahoma Governments    1*05-81*8-8961
1*801 Classen Blvd. Suite 200
Oklahoma City, Okla. 73118
Central  Iowa  Regional
Assoc. of  Governments
101*1/2 East Locust
Des Moines, Iowa  50309
Mr. Terry Smith
 515_2Uli-3257
                                                          Attachment 1

                                                              1-v

-------
Region and Area
  Date of
Designation  Agency
                        Principal
                         Contact
Region VIII

Colorado Springs      6-26-lk
Pueblo County,
Denver, Colorado
Prove, Utah
Uintah, Utah
Region IX

Lake Tahoe
Interstate
9-T.8-71*
10-8-71*
1-1-75
1-10-75
Salt Lake Cty, Utah   3-6-75
8-5-7U
             Pikes Peak Area
             Council of Govts.
             27 East Vermigo
             Colorado Springs,
             Col. 80903
                       Mr.  Ronald  Cow
                         303-1*71-7080
Pueblo Area Council of Mrs. Vicki  Burkhard
Governments             303-51* 3-6006
1 City Hall Place
Pueblo, Col. 81003
Denver Regional
Council of Govts.
1776 So. Jackson
Denver, Colo. 80210

Mountain Assoc. of
Governments
160 East Center St.
Provo, Utah 8U601
Mr. Dave Pampu
 303-758-5166
Mr. George Scott
Uintah Basin Assoc. of Mr. Clint Harrison
Governments
P.O. Box 867
Roosevelt, Utah 81*066
             Salt Lake County
             of Govts.
             2033. So. State Street
             Salt Lake City,
             Utah 81*115
Tahoe Regional
P.O. Box 8896
So. Lake Tahoe,
Calif. 9^705
                       Mr. Claine Ricks
                        801-328-7l»6l
Mr. Larry Rice
 916-5U1-02U6
                                                           L-vi

-------
Region and Agency
  Date of
Designation  Agency
                        Principal
                         Contact
Region X

Portland, Oregon      11-18-7**
Salem, Oregon
Pocatello, Idaho
11-18-71*
Eugene, Springfield,  11-18-7**
Oregon
3-25-75
             Columbia Region Assoc. Mr. Larry Rice
             Governments             503-221-161*6
             61*00 S.W. Canyon Court
             Portland, Oregon 97221
Mid-Willamette Valley
Council of Govts.
Civic Center, RM. 305
Salem, Oregon 97301
                                                          Mr. W.J. Kvarsten
                                                            503-588-6177
             Lane Council of Govts. Mr. Robert Chave
             135 6th Avenue          503-687-1*283
             East Eugene, Oregon
             97^01
Southeast Idaho
Council of Govts.
209 E Louis
Box 1*169
Pocatello, Idaho 83201
                                                          Mr. Scott McDonald
                                                           208-232-U311
                                                            L-vii

-------
                                                       April 1,  1975
                          EPA Regional Contacts
                         208 Program Coordinators
Region I    Maine, Vermont,
            New Hampshire,
            Massachusetts,
            Rhode Island,
            Connecticut
Region II
Region III
New York,
New Jersey,
Puerto Rico,
Virgin Islands

Pennsylvania,
Delaware,
Maryland, Virginia,
W. Virginia, District
of Columbia
Region  IV   Kentucky, Tennessee,
            N. Carolina, South
            Carolina, Georgia,
            Alabama, Mississippi,
            Florida

Region  V    Minnesota,  Wisconsin,
            Michigan, Illinois,
            Indiana, Ohio

Region  VI   New  Mexico,
            Texas,  Oklahoma,
            Arkansas, Louisiana
 Region  VII   Nebrasksm Iowa,
             Kansas,  Missouri
 Region VIII Montana,  N.  Dakota,
             S.  Dakota,  Wyoming,
             Utah,  Colorado
                        HacMillan,  Larry
                        John F.  Kennedy Bldg.
                        Room 2203
                        Boston,  Mass.   02203
Durfor, Charles
26 Federal Plaza
Room 908
New York, N.Y.  1000?
                                                                 617-223-5137
Mattis, Eugene
Curtis Bldg.
6th & Walnut Sts.
Philadelphia, Pa.
                                                       19106
                        Burdine, ficott
                        1^21 Peachtree St., N.E.
                        Atlanta, Georgia  30309
                                                                 212-26U-1833
                                                                 215-597-82U5
                                                                 UoU-526-57814
                        Cloe, William
                        230 So. Dearborn St.
                        Chicago, Illinois  6o6oU

                        Hartung, Roger
                        1600 Patterson St.
                        Suite 1100
                        Dallas, Texas  75201

                        Draper, Don
                        1735 Baltimore Ave.
                        Kansas City, Missouri   6U108

                        Ferraro, Paul
                        i860 Lincoln St.
                        Suite 900
                        Denver, Colorado   80203
                             312-353-5673
                             21U-7U9-1231
                                                                  816-37^-5618
                             303-837-2722
                                                        Attachment 2 -i

-------
Region IX   California, Nevada,     Jones, Tom                   1*15-556-7686
            Arizona, Guam, Hawaii   100 California St.
                                    San Francisco, Calif.
Region X    Alaska, Washington,     Egbert, Ross                 206-U2-1216
            Idaho, Oregon           1200 6th Ave .
                                    Seattle, Washington  98101
                                               Attachment 2 -1

-------
       BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT  PLANNING

                             April I, 1975


NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE  (NTIS)

National Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, Virginia  22161

     The National Technical  Information Service  has available for sale,
both paper  and microfiche  copies  of  many EPA technical  reports.   Some
reports are, however,  available  only in microfiche.  Information on
availability and  prices  is given  only by mail  and can be obtained by
writing to  the NTIS  and  giving  them  the following information:

     1.  Title of  the  report.
     2.  NTIS  accession  number  (usually in the form: P8-00^™0^
     3.  EPA Report  no.  (If known,  usually in the  form: EPA 000/0-00-000).
     4.  Number  of  copies  required.
     5.  Paper copies  or microfiche.

     NTIS  will  respond by  mail  with  a price quote  and  availability
 statement.   Publications can then be ordered by mail with payment enclosed.

 U.S. GOVERNMENT  PRINTING OFFICE (GPO)

 Superintendent of Documents,
 U.S.  Government  Printing  Office
 Washington, D.C.  20402

      The Government Printing Office  has  available  for  sale,  paper
 copies of many EPA  and  other agency  publications.   Information  on  the
 availability and price  of  publications  can  be obtained by calling  the
 Publications Information/Order Desk  at  GPO  in Washington,  D.C.   The
 desk can be reached at  area code 202,  783-3238.   The following  in-
 formation  will be needed.

      1.  Title of the report.
      2.  EPA Report no. (usually  in the form:  EPA 000/0-00-000).
      3.  GPO Stock  no.  (if  known).

      The Information/Order Desk  can then check  the availability and quote
 the price.  If  the  publication  is  available a check for the amount,
 payable to the  Superintendent  of  Documents, can be mailed with the order
 to GPO    Publications will be  mailed upon receipt of  the payment.   If
 ordering  in  the  Washington, D.C.  area  publications can be picked up  in
 person at  GPO.   When  calling  for information and price ask the clerk  to
 assign  a  pick-up number.   The  publication can then be picked up in person
 at GPO.

                                                        Attachment  3-i

-------
                                                                  3-ii

 EPA REGULATIONS
      Most of these regulations should be available in EPA Regional
 Offices.   All  of these regulations also appear in the Code of Federal
 Regulations: 40 Protection of Environment.   This document is~published
 by  the Office  of the Federal Register,  National Archives and Records
 Service,  General Services Administration and is revised as of July 1,
 1974.   Copies  of this document are obtainable from the Superintendent
 of  Documents,  U.S.  Government Printing  Office, Washington, D.C.   20402.
 Call  area code:  202,  783-3238 for information as to availability and
 price.

 40  CFR  Part  126,  Areawide Waste Treatment Management  Planning Areas
 and Responsible  Planning  Agencies.   Federal  Register,  Vol. 38,  No.
 178,  Sept.  14,  1973.

 40  CFR  Part  35,  Subpart F ,  Areawide  Waste Treatment  Planning Agencies:
 Interim Grant  Regulations.   Federal  Register,  Vol.  39,  No.  93,~May7~T974.

 40  CFR  Part  35,  Subpart E,  Appendix A,  Cost  Effectiveness Analysis
 Guidelines.  Federal  Register,  Vol.  38,  No.  174,  Sept.  10,~T97T!

 40  CFR  Part  35,  Subpart E,  Grants  for Construction  oJE  Treatment  Works.
 Federal Register, Vol. 39,  No.  29, Feb.  11,  1974.

 40  CFR  Part  130,  Policies  and  Procedures for  State  Continuning Planning
 Process.  Federal Register,  Vol.  39, No. 107,  June  3,  197^7Tunder
 revision)

 40 CFR  Part  6,  Preparation of  Environmental  Impact  Statements: Interim
 Regulations.  Federal Register, Vol. 39, No.  138, July  17,  1974~

 40 CFR  Part  131,  Preparation p_f Water Quality  Management  Plans.
 Federal Register, Vol. 39, No.  107, June 3,  1974. (under  r^vTsion)

40 CFR  Part  105,  Public Participation in Water Pollution  Control.
Federal Register, Vol. 38, No.  163, August 23, 1973.

40 CFR  Part  35, Subpart B, State and Local Assistance.  Federal
Register,  Vol.  38, No. 125, June 29, 1973.    (under revision)

-------
                                                             3-iii

EPA PROGRAM GUIDANCE
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   Area  and  Agency
Designation Handbook for Section  208 Areawide  Waste  Treatment
Management~Planning. "Washington,  D.C.  1974.   Available  upon
request from EPA Regional Offices.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   Guidance  for  Facilities
Planning.  Washington, D.C.  1974.   Available upon  request  from EPA
Regional Offices.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   Guidelines  for Areawide
Was_te Treatment Management.   Washington,  D.C. 1975.  Available
u"porT~request  from  EPA  Regional  Offices.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   Guidelines  f£r Preparation
of  Water Quality Management  Plans.   Washington,  D.C. 1974.   Avail-
able'upon  request  from EPA  Regional Offices.

U.S. Environmental.Protection Agency.   Water Quality Strategy Paper,
Second  Edition, A  Statement  of  Policy  for Implementing the Require-
ments  of  the  1972  Federal Water Pollution Control  Act Amendments and
Certain Requirements  of  the  1972 Marine Protection,  Research and
Sancuaries Act.  Washington, D.C. 1974.  Available upon request
 from U.S.  EPA,  Water  Planning  Division (WH-454), Washington, D.C
20460.

U.S.  Environmental Protection  agency.   Workplan Handbook for Sec-
tion  208 Areawide  Waste  Treatment Management PLannijig.   Washington,
bTcT W75~AvailabTe~upon  request from EPA Regional Offices.
 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING
      Council of State Governments.  1971 Suggested State
 Legislation (1971); 1972 Suggested S_tate Legislation (1972);
 1973 Suggested State Legislation  (1973TT 1974 Sugge_s£e£ St£te
 LegTsIatlon~n974); ^9_7_5 Suggested State Legislation (1975).
 Availabfe from Council of State Governments  1150  L7th St  ,
 N.W. Washington, D.C.  20036.  $5.00  for each volume covering
 one year.

 Fox, Irving K.  Institutional Design  for Water Qual_ity 5l£nage-
 ment; A Case Study o_f the Wisconsin River Basin,  Vol. I-IX.
 Resources Center,  UnTverTity of Wisconsin, Madison Wisconsin,
 1971.  NTIS PB-199-268.

-------
                                                               3-iv

 Kneese, Allen V.,  and Blair T.  Bower.   Managing  Water  Quality.
 Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins  Press,  1968.

 National Water Commission.  Public  Regulation  of Water Quality  in
 the United States, National Water Commission Legal  Study  No.  1ST"
v Washington, D.C.  1971.  NTIS  PB-208-309.
                             /
 U.S. Department of Interior,  Office of  Water Resources.   Water
 Resources £S £ Basis for Comprehensive  Planning  and  Development
 MI the Christina  River Basin.   University  of Delaware  Water
 Resources Center, Washington, D.C.  1973.   NTIS PB-228-853.

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.    Problems  and  Approaches  to
 Areawide Water Quality Management, Vol. I-IV"School  of  Public~and
 Environmental affairs, Indiana  University, Washington,  D.C.,  1973.
 NTIS PB-239-808.
 URBAN PLANNING AND LAND USE
 Chapin,^ F. Stuart, Jr.  Urban Land Use Planning.  Urbana, Illnois:
 University of Illinois Press, 1965.

 McHarg,  Ian.   Design With Nature.   Garden City: Natural History Press,
 1969.

 U.S.  Council  on Environmental Quality.  The Quiet Revolution in Land
 Use Control.   Fred Bosselman and David CallielTGPO,  stock~no7 4TTT-0006
 $2.75.

 U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.   Promoting Environmental Quality
 Through  Urban Planning and Controls.   Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
 Series,  1974.   NTIS PB-227-090/8.

 U.S.  Environmental Protection Agency.   Stream Quality  Preservation
 Through  Planned Urban Development,  Report no.  EPA R5-73-0197~Soc-
 ioeconomic Environmental  Studies Series,  Washington,  D.C.  1973.   GPO
 $2.60.
 POINT  SOURCE
U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency.   Design  Criteria _for  Mechanical,
Electric,  Fluid  Systems  and  Component  ReliabiliTy.   Washington7~D7c
NTIS  PB-227-558/4.                          '

-------
                                                                3-v

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.   Federal Guidelines,  Operation
and Maintanence of Wastewater Treatment Facilities.Washington,  D.C.
Available upon request  from EPA  Regional  Offices.

U.£>. Environmental Protection Agency.   Guidance  for  Sewer System  Eval-
uation.  Washington D.C. 1974.   Available upon request  from EPA Regional
Offices.
NON-POINT SOURCE
Office of Water Resources Research.   Practice  iji  Detention  of  Storm-
water Runoff.  Herbert G. Poertner, American Public Works Association,
1974.  NTIS  PB-234-554.

U.S. Department of Health.  Sanitary  Land Fill Facts.  Thomas  J.  Sorg
and H. Lanier Hickman, Washington, D.C.  1970.  NTIS~PB-204-403.

U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Water Resources.  Water Resources
Protection Measures I_n Land Development; A Handbook.  Washington,  D.C"
1974.  NTIS  PB-236-049.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Comparative Costs of Erosion
and Sediment Control, Construction Activities,Report no. EPA  430/9-
73-016.  Washington, D.C. 1973.GPO  $2.2(T

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Decision Makers Guide in Solid
Waste Management.  Washington, D.C. 1974.  Available upon request  from
O.S.W.M.P. Publications Distribution  Center, U.S. Environmental Protec-
tion Agency, 5555 Ridge Ave., Cincinnati, Ohio  45268.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Ground Water Pollution  from
Subsurface Excavations, Report no. EPA 430/9-73-012.Washington,  D.C.
1973.  GPO,  $2.25.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Identification and Control  of
Pollution from Salt Water Intrusion.  Washington, D.C.T97T!   NflS~PB-
227-229/2.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Methods and Practices for Con-
trolling Water Pollution from Agricultural Nonpoint Sources, Report
no. EPA 430/9-73-015.  Washington, D.C.  1973~!  GP6"7 $1. 10.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Methods for Identifying and
Evaluating the Nature and Extent p_f NonpointTources of Pollutants,
Report no. EPA 430/9-73-014.  Washington, D.C. 1973. GPO, $2.45.

-------
                                                                   3-vi

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Processes, Procedures and Methods
to Control Pollution Resulting from All Construction Activity, Report  no.
EPA 430/9-73-007.Washington, D.C. 1973.  GPO, $2.30.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Processes, Procedures and Methods
to Control Pollution from Mining Activities, Report no. EPA 430/9-73-011.
Washington, D.C. 1973"GPO, $3.40.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Processes, Procedures and Methods
£o Control Pollution from Silvicultural~Activities, Report no. EPA 430/9-
73-OT(rWashington, D.C. 1973.  GPO, $1.25.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Sanitary Land Fill Design and
Operation.  Dick Brunner and Daniel Keller, Washington, D.C. 1972.
NTIS PB-227-565/9.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Subsurface Water Pollution, A Sel-
ected Annotated Bibliography.  Part I- "Subsurface Waste Injection"; Part
II- "Saline Water Intrusion"; Part III- "Percolation from Subsurface
Sources".  Washington, D.C.  NTIS, Part I: PB-211-340; Part II: PB-211-341;
Part III: PB-211-342.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  The control of_ Pollution from
Hydrographic Modifications, Report no. EPA 430/9-73-017.  Washington,
D.C. 1973.  GPO, $1.95.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.  Urban Stormwater Management ajid
Technology: An Assesment, Report no. EPA  670/2-74-040.  National
Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati, 1974.  GPO, NTIS, (awaiting
number assignment).
DIRECT RESOURCES COST AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
Grant, Eugene L. and W. Grant Ireson.  Principles of Engineering
Economy, 5th edition.  New York: Ronald Press,  1970.

U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.  Alternative Financing Methods
for Clean Water.  Washington, D.C.   (This report  is in  preparation and
will'be available from EPA Regional  Offices upon  completion).

-------
                                                               3-vii
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
Arnstein, Sherry R.  A Ladder o£ Public Participation, "Journal  of
the American Institute of Planners", vol. 35, no. 4.  Washington,D.C.
July, 1969.  Reprints of journals are available  from  Kraus Thomson
Organization Ltd., Route 100, Millwood, N.Y.  10546,  $3.75 per  copy,
State month and year of journal desired.

Burke, Edmund M.  Citizen Participation Strategies, "Journal  of  the
American Institute of Planners".  Washington, D.C.  Sept  1968.   Re-
prints of  iournals are available from Kraus Thomson Organization Ltd.,
Route 100, Millwood, N.Y.   10546, $3.75 per copy.   State  month  and
year of journal desired.

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.   Public Participation  in Water
Resources Planning.  1971. ' NTIS PB-204-2457
ENVIRONMENTAL  IMPACT
U.S. Geological Survey.  A Procedure  for  Evaluating  Environmental
Impact, Circular no.  645." Luna B.  Leopold,  e£.a_l, Washington,  D.C.
1971.  Available upon request  from  U.S. Geological Survey,  National
Center, Reston, Virginia  22092.

U.S. Environmental  Protection  Agency.   Manual  for Preparation  o_f
Environmental  Impact  Statements for Wastewater Treatment  Works,
Facilities Plans,  and 208 Areawide  Waste  Treatment Management  Plans.
Washington, D.C. 1974.  Available upon  request from  U.S.  EPA,  Office
of  Federal Activities (Arl04), Washington,  D.C.   20460.
ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT  TECHNIQUES,  RESIDUAL  WASTE  MANAGEMENT,
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Federal Water  Quality  Administration.   A Study of  Flow Reduction
and Treatment  of Waste from  Households.   James R.  Bailey,  et.  al,
Washington,  D.cT 1969.  ~NTIS PB-197-599.

-------
                                                                    3* • •
                                                                  -Vlll
    U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency.   Acceptable Methods for
    Utilization or Disposal  of Sludges from Publicly Owned Wastewater
    Treatment  Plants.   Washington,  D.C.finis  report is in
    preparation and will  be  available  from EPA  Regional  Offices
    upon  completion).

    U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency.   Alternative Waste  Manage-
    ment  Techniques for Best  Practicable Waste  Treatment,  Technical
    Informaiton Report.   Washington, D.C.  (This report is  in
    preparation and will  be  available  from EPA  Regional  Offices
    upon  completion).

    U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency.   Evaluation of Land
    Application Systems,  Technical  Bulletin,  EPA  Report~no~!
    EPA 520/9-75-001.   Washington,  D.C., March,  1975.  GPO, NTIS
    (awaiting  number assignment).

    U.S.  Environmental  Protection Agency.   Land Application of
    Sewage Effluents and  Sludges; Selected  Abstracts,  Report
    no. EPA 660/2-74-042.  National Environmental Research
    Center, Corvallis,  Ore. 1974.   GPO, $2.80,  NTIS  (awaiting number
    assignment).

    U.S.  Water  Resources  Council.   1972 OBERs Projections;
    Economic Activity In  the U.S.;  Based on Series E  Population,
    vol.  I-VII.  Washington, D.C. 1974.  GPO, stock  no.:  vol.
    I, 5245-0013,  $3.05;  vol.  II, 5245-00014, $2.50;  vol.  Ill,
    5245-00015,  $3.10; vol IV, 5245-00016,  $1.90; vol. V,
    5245-00017,  $2.75; vol. VI, 5245-00018, $2.50; vol.  VII,
    5245-00019,  $2.75.
     >rma ssvio ciaim
see-vda
AON33V NOIJ.03.LOHd 1VJLN3IAINOHIAN3
QlVd S33d QNV BOVlSOd
               ooes asn aivAibd uod
                         ssaNisna
                 09W)Z 'O'd  'NO10NIHSVM
AON39V NOI1031OHd IVlNSIflNOdlANS  'STI
        (zoi.-v) saivddv onand jo

-------