bulletin /I. EPA Policy News/ Recent Events/ Coming Events/ Special Bulletin Report/ Status of the Program/ f Employment Needs/ Approved Designation and Regional Contacts/ References/ April 1975 United States Environmental Protection Agency OFFICE OF WAFER AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS DIVISION OF WATER PLANNING Wcuhmglon D C 20460 Report on Areawide Designation and Planning To date, 45 agencies have been desig- nated,, and 14 agencies have received their gran-tsVfor the planning process of areawide waste' treatment management. Names and 2 locations are listed in a status section. We ^xpexit to add many more agencies by the end . of the fiscal year. - / ""Tne 100 percent Federal funding provided by Section 208 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 may be reduced in Fiscal Year 1976. Thus, we are focusing at this time on the processes of designation and work plan development to help agencies to receive grants before the end of June. We plan to keep you informed on major policy changes, and other HQ announcements, technical assistance services available, and significant comment on important planning issues. We also plan to announce newly designated areas, and reference material to furnish guidance in the planning process and procedure, including availability and source of supply. The need to fill the growing number of specialized positions is well recognized, as 208 agencies increase. We, therefore, will try to facilitate contact between aaencies and qualified individuals. As planning agency programs progress, we intend to pass on to those involved in the planning process any anency experiences deemed useful. Although every planning area is unique, we feel there will be enough functional similarities for shared experiences, in order to imnrove the chances for rapid implementation, and to establish effective continuing planning. Mark A. Pisano Director of Water Planning ------- EPA POLICY NEWS QUICK ACTION NEEDED ON 208 AREA AND AGENCY DESIGNATIONS! The end of Fiscal Year 1975 is only three months away This marks the end of a clear Congressional commitment to provide funding for 208 planning activities at 100 percent of their costs. While we expect additional funds will be available after June 30, the percentage of the Federal share and the total amount that will be available is not yet clear. We urge quick action on area and agency designations and completion of work plans, so that grant applications can be quickly approved. Our regional offices are ready to assist you with these tasks. Moreover, the handbooks and films described in the "Events" section of this bulletin offer additional guidance We must remind you that the States must assume responsibility for meeting Section 208 requirements for all areas that are not designated. We have high expectations for agencies that have received their grants. Section 208 presents an unusual opportunity. The quality of our environmental future depends heavily on the quality of our plans and the actions they guide. EFFECTIVE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ESSENTIAL FOR 208 SUCCESS! The success or failure of areawide water quality manage- ment depends upon the understanding and support of local communities. The agencies and officials involved with 208 planning are responsible for creating effective programs. Guidelines already published in the Federal Register (40 CFR 105) stress the need for public participation in designating areas and agencies, in developing work plans, in management programs, and in statewide implementation plans. Establish a good program according to these minimal rules: -Develop a public information program as soon as possible. -Be sure this information includes water quality data and other pertinent information. -Provide technical and information assistance to public groups for citizen education, community workshops, training, and dissemination of information to communities. ------- -Permit interested individuals to communicate directly with the officials and designers who make critical decisions. -Develop and maintain lists of individuals who want information on a regular basis. -If the state agency's procedures are less stringent, follow EPA regulations on procedures for public participation. -Conduct public meetings to stimulate interest. -When public interest is in doubt, resolve the issue through public involvement or, if necessary, provide alternatives. -Give the public at least 30 days' notice prior to meetings. Prepare detailed fact sheets on the issues involved. -Allow for public comment before negotiating any settlement concerning a pollution source. -Develop procedures to consider evidence submitted by the public. These measures ensure that those affected by 208 planning have an opportunity to become involved. In the next bulletin we will present some imaginative, successful solutions to public participation, based on conversations with planning agencies around the country. RECENT EVENTS AREA AND AGENCY DESIGNATION WORK PLAN HANDBOOKS AVAILABLE EPA has completed the first two of several handbooks on elements of the 208 Program to assist agencies in meeting Federal requirements. The first, Area and Agency Designation Handbook for Section 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning, was published in December 1974. A second handbook, Preparation of Work Plans, was published this February. Copies are available from EPA regional offices or from the EPA Office of Public Affairs, Waterside Mall, (A-107), Washington, D.C. 20460. Other handbooks, to be completed by early summer, will cover: evaluation of interim planning outputs; evaluation of final plans; and management of plan implementation. ------- These handbooks supplement the regulations by presenting expanded guidance, and are designed to help prepare the documents. For example, the Designation Handbook includes the kind of data presentation and evaluation EPA seeks in requests from Governors. Moreover, the handbooks assist EPA in setting quality standards used to evaluate the development and implementation of areawide plans. The Designation Handbook also describes a screening process to assist State governors and EPA in establishing the water quality problem for area designation. TWO EPA FILMS ON 208 AVAILABLE EPA has produced two films on the 208 designation process and work plan development. The films feature discussions by John R. Quarles, EPA Deputy Administrator, James L. Agee, EPA Assistant Administrator for Water and Hazardous Materials, Mark Pisano, Director, Water Planning Division, and directors of ongoing 208 programs. Panel participants include Ms. Merna Hurd, Newark, Delaware, Stephen Dice, Hampton Roads, Virginia, James Barresi, Caribou, Maine, Richard Heikka, Lake Tahoe, California- Nevada, and Frank Lamm, Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, a member of the EPA 208 Advisory Board. The film on the designation process describes how an area and agency can receive an EPA designation, and includes the effects of 208 planning on institutional change, land use controls, and the 201 facilities program. In the Work Plan film, the panelists discuss realities of Work Plan development. Using illustrations based on their experiences, they describe each of the nine major items which must be covered in the Work Plan. ,We anticipate that the films will be useful to planners in all stages of the planning process. The EPA Administrator's Office mailed announcements to approximately 1,300 planning agencies and government officials. The films are being distributed by Modern Talking Picture Service, 2323 New Hyde Park Road, New Hyde Park, New York 11040. COMING EVENTS CONFERENCES ON 208 FOR CONSULTING ENGINEERS The American Consulting Engineers Council, in conjunction with EPA is sponsoring a series of 208 seminars. These seminars will include EPA headquarters personnel, EPA regional personnel, ------- and members of the Corps of Engineers Urban Studies Program The proposed agenda will include 208 Program goals and policies the relationship between 208 planning and other environmental planning efforts, the Corps of Engineers Urban Studies program the 208 Program planning sequence, and other topics relevant to the 208 planning process. The first session was held in Philadelphia on March 26. ' Other sessions are tentatively scheduled for Chicago, Denver Dallas, Atlanta, and San Francisco during April and May. For information, contact Mr. Larry Spiller, American Consulting Engineers Council, 1155 15th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005. MEETINGS WITH 208 PLANNING AGENCIES A second series of EPA-sponsored /meetings with 208 areawide planning agency personnel and interested State representatives will be held in Washington, D.C. (Apr/il 2-3, 1975), New Orleans, Louisiana (April 17-18, 1975), and S,an Francisco, California (April 24-25, 1975). Major agenda topics will center around work plan development, grant application' requirements, cost analysis ^ one latest EPA Policies and technical guidance for implementing the 208 program. * & SPECIAL BULLETIN REPORT AREAWIDE WATER MANAGEMENT UNDER SECTION 208" THE DESIGNATION PROCESS AND WORK PLAN DEVELOPMENT The Designation Process The Federal Water Pollution Control Act sets target dates for completing specific improved water quality goals. By 1977, the Act requires significant reduction in "point" source discharges -- that is, effluent coming from an identifiable D°Ufo!; SUuh as a municiPal sewage system or an industrial outfall By 1983, the goal is to have water clean enough to swim in and support high-level aquatic life. This requires more than just controlling point sources. EPA has concentrated first on a permit system to control and monitor discharges, and on a construction grants program to build necessary sewage treatment plants around the country. However, some water quality problems, particularly from non-point sources, are so complex that many solutions require new approaches. The 208 Program calls for areawide water quality ------- management. Municipalities sharing common water resources and common problems can use Federal funds to set up a management process at a regional level, and cooperate to find solutions. This is a continuing process and.eventually will be used to set up a long-term plan for each area. Solutions to non-point source problems may be harder to achieve, and will probably require changes in community develop- ment plans. It may be necessary to consider alternative land development patterns to obtain both water quality and other community goals. The 208 planning process also enables regional areas to coordinate water quality planning with planning for other EPA programs and those of other Federal agencies which impact water quality. EPA air quality, solid waste disposal, and hazardous materials control programs can be carried out more effectively if each program goal is integrated with other goals. For example, the Volumes of sludge generated by new treatment plants should be handled according to EPA solid waste disposal guidelines and ambient air pollution control guidelines for incineration. Ideally, the 208 Program will enable each area to use its Federal money more effectively and to develop plans that work not studies that gather dust. ' Role of the Federal Government. EPA has three specific tasks to perform to help you achieve your goals: Interpret the Act with guidelines and regulations; allocate funding to get the planning done; and the ability to assist you if any conflicts arise in meeting 208 requirements. Several interpretive documents are available, including Guidelines, Regulations, Executive Summary of the Guide- lines, Designation and Work Plan Handbooks, and materials from the National Association of Regional Councils. These are available from your regional EPA office. To assist you with funding, $150 million have been allocated for Fiscal Year 1975. This is designed to cover 100 percent of your planning costs for two years. Finally, to help coordinate 208 goals with other Federal programs, we can assist you directly if your problems can best be solved in Washington. The 208 Program assists you by presenting a framework within which you can define the problems in your area, and implement their solutions. Metropolitan areas with heavy industrial concentrations are obvious candidates for planning funds. In addition, there are non-metropolitan areas which suffer from complex problems that can best be solved on an areawide basis. ------- Maintaining a unique waterway for prime recreation also qualifies for designation under the 208 Program. Areas where water quality may be diminished because of natural resources development for new energy needs also qualify. These include eastern coal mining regions, and new regions in the West facing water pollution from oil shale or coal development. Area Designation. Although the Governor of each State should take the leadership in designating areas, area officials who wish to quality for the 208 Program should contact the Governor or the State water pollution control authority to petition for consideration. However, the Governor may decide to take no action. In this case, the chief elected officials in local areas may act on their own, and can apply directly to EPA for designation. In addition, a Governor can "non-designate" a potential area, but still reserves the option of designating it later. His action, however, prevents local self- designations. By his action, the Governor assumes the responsibility for State planning on an areawide scale, without benefit of Federal 208 funds. The Planning Agency must include local elected officials, must have the resources and technical ability to develop an effective and implementable plan, and must meet certain criteria regarding representation of local officials, staff capabilities, and jurisdictional authority. In brief, the Agency must have specific legislative authority to carry out the work. The designated area must demonstrate that it has the acceptance and cooperation of the local governments who will participate. This cooperation is evidenced by presenting "Resolutions of Intent" from each official with a vital role in determining the outcome of the work plan. The work plan will not be easily implemented without full participation and support from municipalities. If a State chooses to non-designate an area, it must either certify that no water quality problem exists, or it must assume the responsibility for seeing that planning is conducted and that planned actions are implemented. The law clearly indicates that the States are responsible for conducting areawide planning in non-designated areas. If the State chooses not to perform this work under the auspices of Section 208 it must nontheless satisfy the requirement. ------- 8 This, then, is the process, and the criteria which EPA is using for Section 208. However, this brief statement does not answer all the questions which you may have about the program. For a fuller discussion of the issues, we direct you to the written materials available from your EPA regional office. Major questions regarding area designation usually fall in the following categories: institutional change; land use controls; facilities construction plans; and funding and timing. -Institutional Change There is concern that existing institutions will be radically changed and the balance of powers between state and local governments will be upset by a new regional layer of government. This is not the case. Our emphasis is on plan implemen- tation. Where existing institutions have the required authority and resources to carry out the plan, implemen- tation might only be delayed by imposing a totally new organization. We urge you to work through existing institutions where such institutions form a practicable and efficient base. However, when 208 planning reveals the need for planning or operational functions that are not being adequately addressed by existing groups, new institutions will be needed. -Land Use Controls Some people are concerned that land use planning and control authority will be taken away from local government units and given to the areawide 208 agency, This is not the case. The primary 208 function would require both the planning agency and the local munici- palities to reexamine the land use plans in the area and test them for their compatibility with achieving water quality objectives. -Facilities Construction Plans There is concern that planning and construction of new treatment facilities will be delayed until the 208 plan has been completed and approved. This is not the case. Planning developed under 208 will Lay the groundwork for all future construction of new treatment facilities. Construction of treat- ------- ment works, however, will continue as scheduled during the period in which the initial 208 plan is being developed, -Funding and Timing Some people are concerned that funding and time requirements are inadequate to achieve Section 208 goals. The intent of the Act is quite clear that after designation, a one-year period is allowed for Work Plan development and two years are available for plan implementation - a total of up to three years from designation'. Current procedures require that funds cannot be obligated until a satisfactory grant application, including work plan, is approved. Limit your plans to tasks that can be implemented within the two-year period. Full funding is available for designated areas that have received approval of their grant application before June 30, 1975. EPA has full utilization of $150 million up to that date. Work Plan Development After a planning agency has been designated, a Work Plan must be developed for the project. Since much effort is needed to achieve milestones according to a strict schedule, plans must be completed within two years after a grant award has been made. The Work Plan must define the requirements in detail, in order to make an adequate estimate of the overall cost of the project. As soon as your grant application, including the Work Plan, has been approved, initial disbursement can be made on your grant. Informational materials are available from your regional EPA office to assist you with the step-by-step procedure in developing a Work Plan. An EPA staff is available to answer specific questions. A Work Plan has the following nine sections. -Objectives and Scope; -Work Performed to Date; -Coordination with Other Agencies; -The Planning Process; -Detailed Schedules; -Resource Budget; , -Disbursement and Milestone Schedule; ------- 10 •Compabibility with Other Plans; and •Public Participation. Objectives and Scope The key to an effective 208 planning process is concen-• trating on a manageable number of water quality problems where plans can be made and implemented within the two- year period. The objectives of the planning process should be output-oriented'. Work Performed to Date Wherever designation is feasible, use past studies that apply to present projects. Collecting and analyzing new data is costly and time-consuming. Coordination With Other Agencies EPA encourages active participation with other agencies in the planning process--particularly if they have their own resources and can contribute to the Work Plan. Guard against slipped milestones by ensuring that your Work Plan includes written evidence attesting to the competence of other agencies. The Planning Process The Work Plan lists all of the major tasks that are scheduled to fit into the two-year period. As soon as the task descriptions and schedules are defined, they can be matched with your available resources. Detailed Schedules It is important that priorities and expectations for accomplishments are expressed in concrete terms of resource allocation, and that priorities be matched with the objectives and scope of the plan. Resource Budget Although this is a relatively straightforward task, it is time-consuming if every line item is opened up for lengthy discussion. Need for approving the grant is the effort level distribution by task multiplied by an average cost per unit of time. ------- 11 Disbursement and Milestone Schedule The disbursement schedule has been designed to minimize cash flow problems for the planning agency. An advance payment is replenished quarterly as progress is made. EPA regional offices monitor the achievement of milestones by evaluating quarterly reports as the project progresses. Compatibility With Other Plans The 201 facilities plans, the basin plans made by the States under Section 303(e), and the water resource planning provided by Section 209 must be considered as a part of the 208 planning process. Avoid duplication of effort, and indicate the role of other planning activities in the implementation plan. Public Participation Public representatives, and their interest groups must be involved in order to make meaningful inputs throughout the planning process. Summary Areawide planning is not the result of a one-shot plan. The objectives are to start a planning process that will continue long after immediate requirements are met. STATUS OF THE PROGRAM 1. Designations and Agencies Approved by EPA Administrator (Attachment 1). 2. EPA Regional Contacts (Attachment 2). 3. Bibliography for Areawide Water Quality Management Planning (Attachment 3). EMPLOYMENT NEEDS EMPLOYMENT NEEDS: AN EXCHANGE EPA headquarters has received requests from 208 agencies and EPA regional offices for the names of potential employees to work on the 208 programs. Individuals have also sent in resumes and inquired regarding positions. EPA will forward all names and resumes to the regional offices for distribution ------- L2 to 208 agencies in their region. It is suggested that all 208 agencies contact their local regional offices and place position openings with them. EPA can help you by publishing your partic- ular employment opportunity in this bulletin. Let us know if this would be helpful. POSITIONS AVAILABLE -Water Quality Specialist/Sanitary Engineer--Assist in the development of a two-year 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plan for the Willamette River drainage basin of Lane County, including metropolitan Eugene-Springfield. Requires education, experience and working knowledge in water resource engineering or sanitary science. Ability to communicate and coordinate concepts with local, state and federal planning and engineering professionals as necessary. Salary to $17,500, depending upon education and experience. Closing date for applications is May 1. Send resume to L. Douglas Halley, Executive Director, Lane Council of Governments, 135 Sixth Avenue East, Eugene, Oregon 97401. -Civil Engineer—Master's Degree with emphasis in Sanitary Engineering preferred; or B.S. degree with two years' relevant experience. Duties to include working with a highly specialized team in developing a 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Plan for the Birmingham SMSA (approximate population 750,000). Salary dependent upon qualifications. Submit detailed resume and salary requirements to: Douglas M. Maddock, Director of Planning, Birmingham Regional Planning Commission, Suite 220, 2112 llth Avenue South, Birmingham, Alabama 35205. REFERENCES 1. Interim Grant Regulations, Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning Agencies, Federal Register Monday, May 13, 1974, Volume 39, Number 93, Part IV. 2. Rules and Regulations, Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning Areas and Responsible Plannino Agencies, Federal Register, Volume 38, Number 178° Friday, September 14, 1973, Part 126. 3. Draft Guidelines for Areawide Waste Treatment Management, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20460, May 1974. 4. Executive Summary of Section 208 Program for Designated Areas Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments ot 1972, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, D.C. 20460, October 1974. ------- 13 5. Area and Agency Designation Handbook For Section 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. 20460, December 1974. 6. Flyer - Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, November 1974. 7. Final Agreement (Corps of Engineers), Water Quality Programs and Implementation Plans, Federal Register, Thursday, January 16, 1975, Volume 40, Number 11. Part III. 8. The Challenge and Opportunity to Water Quality Management Planning, National Association of Regional Councils, 1700 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006, August 1974. ------- Current Status of 208 Program As of April 1, 1975 the following forty-five(U5) areas and agency designa- tions have been approved by the Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency: Region and Area Date of Designation Agency Princ ipal Contact Region I Portland, Maine Southern Maine 6-25-71* Greater Portland Council of Governments 169A Ocean Street Portland, Maine OUlo6 7-26-71* Southern Maine Regional Planning Commission York County Courthouse Alfred, Maine OU002 Northern Maine 8-5-71* Lewiston-Auburn, Me. 12-19-71* Augusta-Cobbosse, Me. 12-19-71* Berkshire County Pittsfield, Mass. Mr. Rich Hubbel 207-799-8523 Mr. Dave Crawford 207-32^-2952 Northern Maine Reg. Planning Comm. McElwaine House 2 Maine Street Caribou, Maine 0^736 Androscoggin Valley Regional Planning Commission 3k Court Street Auburn, Maine OU210 Southern Kennebec Regional Planning Commission 151* State Street Augusta, Maine 0^330 2-19-75 Berkshire County Regional Planning Commission Ken Fern Street Pittsfield, Mass. 01201 Mr. Jeff Gammon 207-^98-8736 Mr. Richard Darling 207-781*-0151 Mr. John Forster 207-622-71U6 Mr. Carl Heckler IH3-UU2-1521 Attachment 1 ------- Region and Area Date of Designation Agency Principal Contact Region I Cape Cod., Mass Martha's Vineyard, Mass. Lowell, Mass. Old Colony Brockton, Mass. Region III New Castle County, Delaware Hampton Roads, Va. Roanoke, Virginia 2-27-75 2-27-75 3-U-75 3-6-75 6-12-71* 6-25-71* Cape Cod Planning Mr. Wm. Burlin & Economic Develop- 617-362-2511 ment Commission First District Courthouse Barnstable, Mass. 02630 Martha's Vineyard Land Ms. Rebecca Zanditon & Water Commission 617-693-3^53 Bo* ikhj Oak Bluffs, Mass. 02557 Northern Middlesed Area Commission ihh Merrimac Street Lowell, Mass. 01852 Old Colony Planning Council 232 Main Street Brockton, Mass. 02U01 Mr. Jos. Hannah Mr. Daniel Crane 617-583-1833 New Castle County Mrs. Myrna Herd Council of Governments 302-731-7670 Office of Water/Sewer Mgmt. 2701 Capitol Trail Newark, Delaware 19711 Hampton Roads Water Quality Agency P.O. Box Tiki Norfolk, Va. 23510 5th Planning District Comm. P.O. Box 2527 1^5 West Campbell Ave. Roanoke, Va. 2^010 Mr. Wm. J. Love Mr. Charles Haeussler 703-3U3-M17 Attachment .1 ------- Region and Area Date of Designation Agency Principal Contact Region III Richmond, Virginia 6-25-7^ FrederickslDurg, Va. 1-7-75 Sussex County, Del. Southwest Virginia Region IV Raleigh-Durham, N.C 1-30-75 1-30-75 Richmond-Crater Mr. Harold Consortium Butterworth C/0 Richmond Regional 80^-526-5700 Planning District Commi ssion 301* Sherwood Street Hopewell, Va 23860 Pappahannock Area Mr. Ronald Rebman Development Commission 80*1-373-2890 (RADCO) 913 Charles Street Fredericksburg, Va. 22U01 Sussex County Govt. P.O. Box 507 Georgetown, Del. 199^7 Plateau & Leno^isco Planning District Comm. U.S. Highway 58-U21W Duffield, Va. Triangle J. Council of Governments P.O. Box 12276 Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709 Mr. William C. Henry 302-856-7701 x2l6 Memphis, Tenn. 6-25-75 Knoxville, Tenn. 6-28-71* Miss-Tenn-Ark COG/ Mr> Hugh Teaford Memphis Delta Develop. 9Q1-53U-9775 District 125 No. Main Street Memphis, Tenn. 38103 Knoxville-Knox Counties Metro Planning Agency 301 Locust Street Knoxville, Tenn. 37902 Mr. Don Parnell 615-52U-8618 ------- Region and Area Date of Designation Agency Princ ipal Contact Region IV Chattanooga, Tenn, Nashville, Tenn. Birmingham, Ala, luscaloos-a, Ala. Columbia, S.C. 10-10-T1* 11-11-71* 3-25-75 3-25-75 3-25-75 Mr. Ron Sailer 615-266-5781 Chattanooga Area Regional Council of Governments 1413 James Bldg. 735 Broad Street Chattanooga, Tenn. 37^02 • I Mid-Cumberland Council Mr. Larry Raybon of Govts./Development 6l5-2UU-1212 District Suite 801 226 Capitol Boulevard Nashville, Tenn. 37219 Birmingham Regional Planning Commission 21 Office Plaza South 2112 llth Ave., South Birmingham, Ala. 35205 West Ala. Planning & Development Council P.O. Box 86 Tuscaloosa, Ala. 35**01 Central Midland Regional Planning Counc il Dutch Plaza, Suite 55 800 Diitch. Square Blvd. Columbia, S.C. 29210 Mr. Doug Maddock 205-325-3897 Ms. NancyLandgraf 205-3i*5-55li5 Ms. Nancy Landgraf 205-3^5-55^5 Region V Palm Beach Co., 1-10-75 Florida Cincinnati, Ohio 6-12-71! Planning Board of Palm Beach County P.O. Box 36^3 West Palm Beach, Fla. 33^02 Mr. Richard Stalker 305-683-9^50 Ohio-Kentucky-Indiana Regional Council of Government s 1+26 East Uth Street Cincinnati, Ohio 1*5202 Mr. Dory Montazemi 513-621-7060 1-iv ------- Region and Area Date of Designation Agency Principal Contact Region V Toledo, Ohio Dayton, Ohio Youngstown, Ohio Southeastern Wisconsin Region VI Tulsa, Oklahoma Oklahoma City Region VII Des Moines, Iowa 6-25-71* 6-25-71* 6-28-7** 12-26-7U 10-25-71* 6-10-71* Toledo Metropolitan Mr. Hintz Area Council of Govts. "usselman 1*20 Madison Ave. 1*19-21*1-9155 Suite 725 Toledo, Ohio l»36ol* Miami Valley Regional Planning Commission 333 West First Street Dayton, Ohio 1*51*02 Eastgate Development& Transportation Agency l6l6 Covington Street Youngstown, Ohio 1*1+510 Mr. Roger Riga 513-223-6323 Mr. Bill Fergus 216-71*6-1*665 Southeastern Wisconsin Mr. Kirk Bower Planning Comn. (SEWRPC) l*lU-5l*7-6721 916 N.E. Ave. Waukesha, Wisconsin 53186 Indian Nations Council Mr. Jim Newby of Governments 918-587-3178 630 West Seventh Street Tulsa, Oklahoma 71*127 Assoc. of Central Mr. Larry Goodman Oklahoma Governments 1*05-81*8-8961 1*801 Classen Blvd. Suite 200 Oklahoma City, Okla. 73118 Central Iowa Regional Assoc. of Governments 101*1/2 East Locust Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Mr. Terry Smith 515_2Uli-3257 Attachment 1 1-v ------- Region and Area Date of Designation Agency Principal Contact Region VIII Colorado Springs 6-26-lk Pueblo County, Denver, Colorado Prove, Utah Uintah, Utah Region IX Lake Tahoe Interstate 9-T.8-71* 10-8-71* 1-1-75 1-10-75 Salt Lake Cty, Utah 3-6-75 8-5-7U Pikes Peak Area Council of Govts. 27 East Vermigo Colorado Springs, Col. 80903 Mr. Ronald Cow 303-1*71-7080 Pueblo Area Council of Mrs. Vicki Burkhard Governments 303-51* 3-6006 1 City Hall Place Pueblo, Col. 81003 Denver Regional Council of Govts. 1776 So. Jackson Denver, Colo. 80210 Mountain Assoc. of Governments 160 East Center St. Provo, Utah 8U601 Mr. Dave Pampu 303-758-5166 Mr. George Scott Uintah Basin Assoc. of Mr. Clint Harrison Governments P.O. Box 867 Roosevelt, Utah 81*066 Salt Lake County of Govts. 2033. So. State Street Salt Lake City, Utah 81*115 Tahoe Regional P.O. Box 8896 So. Lake Tahoe, Calif. 9^705 Mr. Claine Ricks 801-328-7l»6l Mr. Larry Rice 916-5U1-02U6 L-vi ------- Region and Agency Date of Designation Agency Principal Contact Region X Portland, Oregon 11-18-7** Salem, Oregon Pocatello, Idaho 11-18-71* Eugene, Springfield, 11-18-7** Oregon 3-25-75 Columbia Region Assoc. Mr. Larry Rice Governments 503-221-161*6 61*00 S.W. Canyon Court Portland, Oregon 97221 Mid-Willamette Valley Council of Govts. Civic Center, RM. 305 Salem, Oregon 97301 Mr. W.J. Kvarsten 503-588-6177 Lane Council of Govts. Mr. Robert Chave 135 6th Avenue 503-687-1*283 East Eugene, Oregon 97^01 Southeast Idaho Council of Govts. 209 E Louis Box 1*169 Pocatello, Idaho 83201 Mr. Scott McDonald 208-232-U311 L-vii ------- April 1, 1975 EPA Regional Contacts 208 Program Coordinators Region I Maine, Vermont, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecticut Region II Region III New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, W. Virginia, District of Columbia Region IV Kentucky, Tennessee, N. Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, Florida Region V Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio Region VI New Mexico, Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana Region VII Nebrasksm Iowa, Kansas, Missouri Region VIII Montana, N. Dakota, S. Dakota, Wyoming, Utah, Colorado HacMillan, Larry John F. Kennedy Bldg. Room 2203 Boston, Mass. 02203 Durfor, Charles 26 Federal Plaza Room 908 New York, N.Y. 1000? 617-223-5137 Mattis, Eugene Curtis Bldg. 6th & Walnut Sts. Philadelphia, Pa. 19106 Burdine, ficott 1^21 Peachtree St., N.E. Atlanta, Georgia 30309 212-26U-1833 215-597-82U5 UoU-526-57814 Cloe, William 230 So. Dearborn St. Chicago, Illinois 6o6oU Hartung, Roger 1600 Patterson St. Suite 1100 Dallas, Texas 75201 Draper, Don 1735 Baltimore Ave. Kansas City, Missouri 6U108 Ferraro, Paul i860 Lincoln St. Suite 900 Denver, Colorado 80203 312-353-5673 21U-7U9-1231 816-37^-5618 303-837-2722 Attachment 2 -i ------- Region IX California, Nevada, Jones, Tom 1*15-556-7686 Arizona, Guam, Hawaii 100 California St. San Francisco, Calif. Region X Alaska, Washington, Egbert, Ross 206-U2-1216 Idaho, Oregon 1200 6th Ave . Seattle, Washington 98101 Attachment 2 -1 ------- BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR AREAWIDE WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING April I, 1975 NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE (NTIS) National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, Virginia 22161 The National Technical Information Service has available for sale, both paper and microfiche copies of many EPA technical reports. Some reports are, however, available only in microfiche. Information on availability and prices is given only by mail and can be obtained by writing to the NTIS and giving them the following information: 1. Title of the report. 2. NTIS accession number (usually in the form: P8-00^™0^ 3. EPA Report no. (If known, usually in the form: EPA 000/0-00-000). 4. Number of copies required. 5. Paper copies or microfiche. NTIS will respond by mail with a price quote and availability statement. Publications can then be ordered by mail with payment enclosed. U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE (GPO) Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 The Government Printing Office has available for sale, paper copies of many EPA and other agency publications. Information on the availability and price of publications can be obtained by calling the Publications Information/Order Desk at GPO in Washington, D.C. The desk can be reached at area code 202, 783-3238. The following in- formation will be needed. 1. Title of the report. 2. EPA Report no. (usually in the form: EPA 000/0-00-000). 3. GPO Stock no. (if known). The Information/Order Desk can then check the availability and quote the price. If the publication is available a check for the amount, payable to the Superintendent of Documents, can be mailed with the order to GPO Publications will be mailed upon receipt of the payment. If ordering in the Washington, D.C. area publications can be picked up in person at GPO. When calling for information and price ask the clerk to assign a pick-up number. The publication can then be picked up in person at GPO. Attachment 3-i ------- 3-ii EPA REGULATIONS Most of these regulations should be available in EPA Regional Offices. All of these regulations also appear in the Code of Federal Regulations: 40 Protection of Environment. This document is~published by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration and is revised as of July 1, 1974. Copies of this document are obtainable from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. Call area code: 202, 783-3238 for information as to availability and price. 40 CFR Part 126, Areawide Waste Treatment Management Planning Areas and Responsible Planning Agencies. Federal Register, Vol. 38, No. 178, Sept. 14, 1973. 40 CFR Part 35, Subpart F , Areawide Waste Treatment Planning Agencies: Interim Grant Regulations. Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 93,~May7~T974. 40 CFR Part 35, Subpart E, Appendix A, Cost Effectiveness Analysis Guidelines. Federal Register, Vol. 38, No. 174, Sept. 10,~T97T! 40 CFR Part 35, Subpart E, Grants for Construction oJE Treatment Works. Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 29, Feb. 11, 1974. 40 CFR Part 130, Policies and Procedures for State Continuning Planning Process. Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 107, June 3, 197^7Tunder revision) 40 CFR Part 6, Preparation of Environmental Impact Statements: Interim Regulations. Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 138, July 17, 1974~ 40 CFR Part 131, Preparation p_f Water Quality Management Plans. Federal Register, Vol. 39, No. 107, June 3, 1974. (under r^vTsion) 40 CFR Part 105, Public Participation in Water Pollution Control. Federal Register, Vol. 38, No. 163, August 23, 1973. 40 CFR Part 35, Subpart B, State and Local Assistance. Federal Register, Vol. 38, No. 125, June 29, 1973. (under revision) ------- 3-iii EPA PROGRAM GUIDANCE U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Area and Agency Designation Handbook for Section 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management~Planning. "Washington, D.C. 1974. Available upon request from EPA Regional Offices. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidance for Facilities Planning. Washington, D.C. 1974. Available upon request from EPA Regional Offices. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines for Areawide Was_te Treatment Management. Washington, D.C. 1975. Available u"porT~request from EPA Regional Offices. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidelines f£r Preparation of Water Quality Management Plans. Washington, D.C. 1974. Avail- able'upon request from EPA Regional Offices. U.S. Environmental.Protection Agency. Water Quality Strategy Paper, Second Edition, A Statement of Policy for Implementing the Require- ments of the 1972 Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments and Certain Requirements of the 1972 Marine Protection, Research and Sancuaries Act. Washington, D.C. 1974. Available upon request from U.S. EPA, Water Planning Division (WH-454), Washington, D.C 20460. U.S. Environmental Protection agency. Workplan Handbook for Sec- tion 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management PLannijig. Washington, bTcT W75~AvailabTe~upon request from EPA Regional Offices. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLANNING Council of State Governments. 1971 Suggested State Legislation (1971); 1972 Suggested S_tate Legislation (1972); 1973 Suggested State Legislation (1973TT 1974 Sugge_s£e£ St£te LegTsIatlon~n974); ^9_7_5 Suggested State Legislation (1975). Availabfe from Council of State Governments 1150 L7th St , N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036. $5.00 for each volume covering one year. Fox, Irving K. Institutional Design for Water Qual_ity 5l£nage- ment; A Case Study o_f the Wisconsin River Basin, Vol. I-IX. Resources Center, UnTverTity of Wisconsin, Madison Wisconsin, 1971. NTIS PB-199-268. ------- 3-iv Kneese, Allen V., and Blair T. Bower. Managing Water Quality. Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins Press, 1968. National Water Commission. Public Regulation of Water Quality in the United States, National Water Commission Legal Study No. 1ST" v Washington, D.C. 1971. NTIS PB-208-309. / U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Water Resources. Water Resources £S £ Basis for Comprehensive Planning and Development MI the Christina River Basin. University of Delaware Water Resources Center, Washington, D.C. 1973. NTIS PB-228-853. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Problems and Approaches to Areawide Water Quality Management, Vol. I-IV"School of Public~and Environmental affairs, Indiana University, Washington, D.C., 1973. NTIS PB-239-808. URBAN PLANNING AND LAND USE Chapin,^ F. Stuart, Jr. Urban Land Use Planning. Urbana, Illnois: University of Illinois Press, 1965. McHarg, Ian. Design With Nature. Garden City: Natural History Press, 1969. U.S. Council on Environmental Quality. The Quiet Revolution in Land Use Control. Fred Bosselman and David CallielTGPO, stock~no7 4TTT-0006 $2.75. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Promoting Environmental Quality Through Urban Planning and Controls. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies Series, 1974. NTIS PB-227-090/8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Stream Quality Preservation Through Planned Urban Development, Report no. EPA R5-73-0197~Soc- ioeconomic Environmental Studies Series, Washington, D.C. 1973. GPO $2.60. POINT SOURCE U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Design Criteria _for Mechanical, Electric, Fluid Systems and Component ReliabiliTy. Washington7~D7c NTIS PB-227-558/4. ' ------- 3-v U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Federal Guidelines, Operation and Maintanence of Wastewater Treatment Facilities.Washington, D.C. Available upon request from EPA Regional Offices. U.£>. Environmental Protection Agency. Guidance for Sewer System Eval- uation. Washington D.C. 1974. Available upon request from EPA Regional Offices. NON-POINT SOURCE Office of Water Resources Research. Practice iji Detention of Storm- water Runoff. Herbert G. Poertner, American Public Works Association, 1974. NTIS PB-234-554. U.S. Department of Health. Sanitary Land Fill Facts. Thomas J. Sorg and H. Lanier Hickman, Washington, D.C. 1970. NTIS~PB-204-403. U.S. Department of Interior, Office of Water Resources. Water Resources Protection Measures I_n Land Development; A Handbook. Washington, D.C" 1974. NTIS PB-236-049. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Comparative Costs of Erosion and Sediment Control, Construction Activities,Report no. EPA 430/9- 73-016. Washington, D.C. 1973.GPO $2.2(T U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Decision Makers Guide in Solid Waste Management. Washington, D.C. 1974. Available upon request from O.S.W.M.P. Publications Distribution Center, U.S. Environmental Protec- tion Agency, 5555 Ridge Ave., Cincinnati, Ohio 45268. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Ground Water Pollution from Subsurface Excavations, Report no. EPA 430/9-73-012.Washington, D.C. 1973. GPO, $2.25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Identification and Control of Pollution from Salt Water Intrusion. Washington, D.C.T97T! NflS~PB- 227-229/2. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods and Practices for Con- trolling Water Pollution from Agricultural Nonpoint Sources, Report no. EPA 430/9-73-015. Washington, D.C. 1973~! GP6"7 $1. 10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Methods for Identifying and Evaluating the Nature and Extent p_f NonpointTources of Pollutants, Report no. EPA 430/9-73-014. Washington, D.C. 1973. GPO, $2.45. ------- 3-vi U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Processes, Procedures and Methods to Control Pollution Resulting from All Construction Activity, Report no. EPA 430/9-73-007.Washington, D.C. 1973. GPO, $2.30. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Processes, Procedures and Methods to Control Pollution from Mining Activities, Report no. EPA 430/9-73-011. Washington, D.C. 1973"GPO, $3.40. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Processes, Procedures and Methods £o Control Pollution from Silvicultural~Activities, Report no. EPA 430/9- 73-OT(rWashington, D.C. 1973. GPO, $1.25. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Sanitary Land Fill Design and Operation. Dick Brunner and Daniel Keller, Washington, D.C. 1972. NTIS PB-227-565/9. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Subsurface Water Pollution, A Sel- ected Annotated Bibliography. Part I- "Subsurface Waste Injection"; Part II- "Saline Water Intrusion"; Part III- "Percolation from Subsurface Sources". Washington, D.C. NTIS, Part I: PB-211-340; Part II: PB-211-341; Part III: PB-211-342. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The control of_ Pollution from Hydrographic Modifications, Report no. EPA 430/9-73-017. Washington, D.C. 1973. GPO, $1.95. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Urban Stormwater Management ajid Technology: An Assesment, Report no. EPA 670/2-74-040. National Environmental Research Center, Cincinnati, 1974. GPO, NTIS, (awaiting number assignment). DIRECT RESOURCES COST AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS Grant, Eugene L. and W. Grant Ireson. Principles of Engineering Economy, 5th edition. New York: Ronald Press, 1970. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency. Alternative Financing Methods for Clean Water. Washington, D.C. (This report is in preparation and will'be available from EPA Regional Offices upon completion). ------- 3-vii PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Arnstein, Sherry R. A Ladder o£ Public Participation, "Journal of the American Institute of Planners", vol. 35, no. 4. Washington,D.C. July, 1969. Reprints of journals are available from Kraus Thomson Organization Ltd., Route 100, Millwood, N.Y. 10546, $3.75 per copy, State month and year of journal desired. Burke, Edmund M. Citizen Participation Strategies, "Journal of the American Institute of Planners". Washington, D.C. Sept 1968. Re- prints of iournals are available from Kraus Thomson Organization Ltd., Route 100, Millwood, N.Y. 10546, $3.75 per copy. State month and year of journal desired. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Public Participation in Water Resources Planning. 1971. ' NTIS PB-204-2457 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT U.S. Geological Survey. A Procedure for Evaluating Environmental Impact, Circular no. 645." Luna B. Leopold, e£.a_l, Washington, D.C. 1971. Available upon request from U.S. Geological Survey, National Center, Reston, Virginia 22092. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Manual for Preparation o_f Environmental Impact Statements for Wastewater Treatment Works, Facilities Plans, and 208 Areawide Waste Treatment Management Plans. Washington, D.C. 1974. Available upon request from U.S. EPA, Office of Federal Activities (Arl04), Washington, D.C. 20460. ALTERNATIVE TREATMENT TECHNIQUES, RESIDUAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, POPULATION PROJECTIONS Federal Water Quality Administration. A Study of Flow Reduction and Treatment of Waste from Households. James R. Bailey, et. al, Washington, D.cT 1969. ~NTIS PB-197-599. ------- 3* • • -Vlll U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Acceptable Methods for Utilization or Disposal of Sludges from Publicly Owned Wastewater Treatment Plants. Washington, D.C.finis report is in preparation and will be available from EPA Regional Offices upon completion). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Alternative Waste Manage- ment Techniques for Best Practicable Waste Treatment, Technical Informaiton Report. Washington, D.C. (This report is in preparation and will be available from EPA Regional Offices upon completion). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Evaluation of Land Application Systems, Technical Bulletin, EPA Report~no~! EPA 520/9-75-001. Washington, D.C., March, 1975. GPO, NTIS (awaiting number assignment). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Land Application of Sewage Effluents and Sludges; Selected Abstracts, Report no. EPA 660/2-74-042. National Environmental Research Center, Corvallis, Ore. 1974. GPO, $2.80, NTIS (awaiting number assignment). U.S. Water Resources Council. 1972 OBERs Projections; Economic Activity In the U.S.; Based on Series E Population, vol. I-VII. Washington, D.C. 1974. GPO, stock no.: vol. I, 5245-0013, $3.05; vol. II, 5245-00014, $2.50; vol. Ill, 5245-00015, $3.10; vol IV, 5245-00016, $1.90; vol. V, 5245-00017, $2.75; vol. VI, 5245-00018, $2.50; vol. VII, 5245-00019, $2.75. >rma ssvio ciaim see-vda AON33V NOIJ.03.LOHd 1VJLN3IAINOHIAN3 QlVd S33d QNV BOVlSOd ooes asn aivAibd uod ssaNisna 09W)Z 'O'd 'NO10NIHSVM AON39V NOI1031OHd IVlNSIflNOdlANS 'STI (zoi.-v) saivddv onand jo ------- |