EPA-460/3-76-022
July 1976
         NITROGEN OXIDE CONTROL
             WITH DELAYED-MIXING,
                 STRATIFIED-CHARGE
                      ENGINE CONCEPT
       U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           Office of Air and Waste Management
        Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
           Emission Control Technology Division
              Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

-------
This report is issued by the Environmental Protection
Agency to report technical data of interest to a
limited number of readers.  Copies are available free
of charge to Federal employees, current contractors
and grantees, and nonprofit organizations - in limited
quantities - from the Library Services Office (MD-35),
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711; or, for a
fee, from the National Technical Information Service,
5285 Port Royal Road, Springfield, Virginia 22161.
This report was furnished to the Environmental Protec-
tion Agency by the Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, in
fulfillment of Grant No. R803858-01-0.  The contents
of this report are reproduced herein as received from
the University of Wisconsin.  The opinions, findings,
and conclusions expressed are those of the author and
not necessarily those of the Environmental Protection
Agency.  Mention of company or product names is not to
be considered as an endorsement by the Environmental
Protection Agency.
              Publication Ho. EPA-460/3-76-022
                          ii

-------
                                EPA-460/3-76-022
NITROGEN OXIDE CONTROL
  WITH DELAYED-MIXING,
     STRATIFIED-CHARGE
       ENGINE CONCEPT
                    by

          L.W. Evt-rs. P.S. Myers, anil O.A. I >ehara

          Department of Mechanical Engineering
              I'niversity of Wisconsin
              Madison, Wisconsin 53706
              Grant No. R803858-01-0
          EPA Project Officer: John J. McFadden
                 Prepared for

        ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
           Office of Air and Waste Management
        Office of Mobile Source Air Pollution Control
           Emission Control Technology Division
             Ann Arbor, Michigan 48105

                  July 1976

-------
                      ABSTRACT







     The purpose of this study is to explore methods of



controlling the nitrogen oxide emissions from internal



combustion engines.  From computer calculations, the



delayed mixing stratified charge engine concept was



selected.  In the delayed mixing stratified charge en-



gine concept, combustion is initiated and completed in



a fuel-rich region, then air is mixed into those rich



products.  A study of existing engines shows that some



operational stratified charge engines limit nitrogen



oxide emissions in a manner similar to the delayed



mixing concept.  A single cylinder engine was modified



to  include an air injection valve.  When air was injected



after rich combustion, the nitrogen oxide emissions were



lower, the hydrocarbon emissions were lower, the carbon



monoxide  emissions were about the same and the



efficiencies were  lower than  for homogeneous operation



at  the same overall  fuel-air  ratio.
                          11

-------
                       PREFACE

     The material presented in this report is essentially
the Ph.D. Dissertation of L. W. Evers.   Much of the
support for the study was provided by the U. S.
Environmental Protection Agency.  The theoretical study
given in Chapter II was presented as a Society of Auto-
motive Engineers (SAE) paper  (741172) at the International
Stratified Charge Engine Conference in Troy, Michigan
(1974).  Other results are to be presented in a SAE paper
in February 1977.
     The thesis was written in  the conventional British
units.  Appendix I has been added to the report which
includes the conversion to SI Units.
                          111

-------
                  TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                     Page

PREFACE                                              iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS                                     iv
LIST OF FIGURES                                       ix
LIST OF TABLES                                       xiv
NOMENCLATURE                                         xv

CHAPTER I      INTRODUCTION                            1

SUMMARY                                                4

CONCLUSION                                            11

CHAPTER II     A THEORETICAL STUDY OF NITRIC  OXIDE

               EMISSIONS FROM INTERNAL  COMBUSTION

               ENGINES                                13

  A.  INTRODUCTION                                    13

  B.  NITRIC OXIDE KINETICS                           14

  C.  COMPUTER MODELS                                 17

      1.  One System Model                            18

      2.  Two System Model                            20

  D.  POTENTIAL ENGINE  CONFIGURATIONS                 22

      1.  Homogeneous Charge-Conventional SI  Engine  22

      2.  Stratified Charge Engine                     32

  E.  CONCLUSIONS                                      51

CHAPTER III  A DISCUSSION OF NITROGEN  OXIDE EMISSIONS

             FROM VARIOUS TYPES OF  INTERNAL COMBUS-

             TION ENGINES                              53

  A.  INTRODUCTION                                     53

  B.  COMBUSTION CONCEPTS OF STRATIFIED CHARGE

      ENGINES                                          55
                            IV

-------
                                                      Page
 C.  DEFINITIONS OF SOME TYPES OF INTERNAL COMBUS-
     TION ENGINES                                       58
 D.  HOMOGENEOUS CHARGE ENGINES                         61
 E.  THREE-VALVE STRATIFIED CHARGE ENGINES              63
 F.  RAPID  MIXING STRATIFIED CHARGE ENGINE              68
     1.  Instantaneous Mixing Stratified Charge
         Engine Concept                                 68
     2.  Texaco Contrc-lled-Combustion System  (TCCS)     69
 G.  LIMITED MIXING STRATIFIED CHARGE ENGINES           70
     1.  Delayed Mixing Stratified Charge Engine
         Concept                                        70
     2.  Ford Programmed  Combustion  (PROCO) Engine      70
      3.  Newhall Engine                                 76
 H.  COMPRESSION IGNITION STRATIFIED CHARGE ENGINES     78
     1.   Open Chamber Diesel Engines                    83
      2.   Divided Chamber  Diesel  Engines                 85
CHAPTER IV   THE TEST  FACILITY AND INSTRUMENTATION       89
 A.   INTRODUCTION                                        89
  B.  ENGINE                                             90
  C.   DYNAMOMETER                                        93
  D.   FUEL SYSTEM                                        94
  E.   CARBURETION AIR SYSTEM                             96
  F.   INJECTION AIR SYSTEM                               97
      1.  High Pressure Air Compressor System            97

-------
                                                      Page
      2.   High Pressure Air Flow Measurement  System      98
      3.   Air Injection Valve                            "
  G.   PRESSURE TRANSDUCER SYSTEM                        99
  H.   OSCILLOSCOPE                                     10°
  I.   MULTIPOINT TEMPERATURE RECORDER                  100
  J.   EMISSIONS CART                                   101
      1.   Nitric Oxide Measurement                     101
      2.   Carbon Monoxide Measurement                  1°2
      3.   Hydrocarbon Measurement                      1°3
CHAPTER V    THE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM AND TEST RESULTS 105
  A.   INTRODUCTION                                     105
  B.   ENGINE INPUT VARIABLES                           107
      1.   Operational Variables                        107
      2.   Design Variables                             109
      3.   Equivalence Ratios as Alternate Operational
          Variables                                    109
      b.   Specified Operational Variables              110
  C.  A DISCUSSION OF THE THEORETICAL TRENDS EXPECTED
      IN  THE EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS                      112
      1,  Nitrogen Oxide Emissions                     112
      2.  Carbon Monoxide Emissions                    113
      3.  Hydrocarbon Emissions                        115
      4.  Engine Power                                 117
      5.  Efficiency                                   119
                           vi

-------
                                                      Page

D.  IARGE DIAMETER NOZZLE TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  121
    1.  Check-Out                                      121
    2.  Test Conditions for Large Diameter Nozzle      122
    3.  Summary of Results for Large Diameter Nozzle   123
    4.  Nitrogen Oxide Emissions for Large Diameter
        Nozzle                                         124
    5.  Carbon Monoxide Emissions for Large Diameter
        Nozzle                                         127
    6.  Hydrocarbon Emissions for Large Dia. Nozzle    127
    ?.  Engine Efficiency for Large Diameter
        Nozzle                                         130
    8.  Discussion of Results for Large Diameter
        Nozzle                                         133
E.  SMALL DIAMETER NOZZLE TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION  133
    1.  Test Conditions  for Small Diameter Nozzle      133
    2.  Summary  of Results for Small Diameter Nozzle   134
    3.  Nitrogen Oxide Emissions for Small Diameter
        Nozzle                                         136
    b.  Carbon Monoxide  Emissions for  Small  Diameter
        Nozzle                                         144
    5.  Hydrocarbon Emissions for Small Diameter
        Nozzle                                         146
     6.  Engine Efficiency for Small Diameter Nozzle    152
                        VI1

-------
                                                        Page




       7.  Engine Power for Small Diameter Nozzle        159



       8.  Start of Air Injection at 128° BTDC           161



       9.  The Effect of Air Injection on Combustion     164



      10.  Discussion of Results for Small Diameter



           Nozzle                                        167
REFERENCES                                               168



APPENDICES                                               1?5




 A.  METHOD USED TO CALCULATE NITRIC OXIDE               175



 B.  ONE SYSTEM COMPUTER MODEL                           177



 C.  TWO SYSTEM COMPUTER MODEL                           197




 D.  DEFINITIONS OF THE PERFORMANCE PARAMETERS



     USED IN CHAPTER II                                  221




 E.  AIR INJECTION FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT                 222



 F.  MECHANICAL DESIGN OF AIR INJECTION VALVE            227




 G.  PERFORMANCE OF AIR INJECTION VALVE                  23!



 H.  DATA REDUCTION COMPUTER PROGRAM                     240



 I.  CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS                             241
                         VI11

-------
                    LIST OF FIGURES


                                                       Page
Figure 1    Two System Model of the Stratified Charge
            Engine Conf igurations                        21

Figure 2    The Combustion Function for the One-
            System and Two-System Models                 24

Figure 3    The Expansion Function for the One-System
            Model (Weibe) and the Two-System Model
            (Crank and Piston)                           25

Figure 4    Indicated' specific nitric oxide (ISNO)
            versus indicated mean effective pressure
            (IMEP) for homogeneous charge engine con-
            figuration                                   29

Figure 5    Indicated enthalpy efficiency (IEE)
            versus indicated mean effective pressure
            (IMEP) for homogeneous charge engine
            configuration                                30

Figure 6    The Influence of the Times of Heat Release
            for a Homogeneous Charge Engine Operating
            with F = 1.0 and EGR = .2 and the Delayed
            and Instantaneous Mixing Stratified Charge
            Engine Configuration Operating with
            Fexhaust = 1-0 and EGR        = .2            34
Figure 7    A Comparison of the Heat Release for In-
            stantaneous Mixing, Delayed Mixing and
            Homogeneous Combustion Corresponding to
            Figure 6.                                     35

Figure 8    The Mass Fraction Burned and the Product
            Mixture Equivalence Ratio (for Two of the
            Nine Conditions) Corresponding to Figure
            9 and Figure 10                               37

Figure 9    Indicated Specific Nitric Oxide for In-
            stantaneous Mixing Stratified Charge En-
            gine Configuration                            38

Figure 10   Indicated Specific Nitric Oxide for De-
            layed Mixing Stratified Charge Engine
            Configuration                                 3?
                          IX

-------
                                                       Page
Figure 11



Figure 12



Figure 13



Figure 14



Figure 15



Figure 16

Figure 1?



Figure 18



Figure 19



Figure 20


Figure 21




Figure 22
A Comparison Between Delayed Mixing, In-
stantaneous Mixing and Homogeneous Com-
bustion by Constant Equivalence Ratio        42

A Comparison Between Delayed Mixing, In-
stantaneous Mixing and Homogeneous Com-
bustion by Constant EGR                      43

A Comparison of the Indicated Enthalpy
Efficiency of Delayed Mixing, Instanta-
neous Mixing and Homogeneous Combustion      46

The Engine Combustion Configuration Meeting
an Indicated Specific Nitric Oxide Level of
1.0 and 0.1 g/I hp-hr                        47

The Engine Combustion Configuration Meeting
an indicated Specific Nitric Oxide Level
of 5.0 and 2.0 g/Ihp-hr                      48

Simplified Combustion Process Schematics     56

Exhaust Composition versus Air-Fuel Ratio
for 15° BTDC Spark Timing From Huls, T. A.
(1966)                                       62

Comparisons of Exhaust "Emissions  of CVCC
Engine with Conventional Engine From
Tasuku Date et al.  (197^)                    66

Comparisons of Exhaust Emission at  Constant
Indicated Specific  Fuel Consumption From
Yasuo Sakai  (197^).                          67

Single Cylinder Evaluations HC plus NOX
Emissions From Mitchell et al. (1972)        71

Comparison of Premixed and Stratified
NO Concentrations as a Function of
Equivalence Ratio at 0% EGR.  From
Lavoie and Blumberg  (1973)                   74

Nitrogen  Oxide Concentration versus Over-
all Equivalence Ratio for Wide Open
Throttle  and 65$ Prechamber Volume, From
Ingham  (1976)                                77
                           x

-------
                                                      Page
Figure 23   Gaseous Composition in the  Center  of  the
            Fuel Spray as a Function of Crank  Angle
            From Nightingale,  D.  R.  (1975)                80

Figure 24-   Nitric Oxide Concentration  Versus  Equiva-
            lence Ratio for Samples Taken From Within
            a Direct Injection Diesel After Combus-
            tion                                         82

Figure 25   NOX Concentration, Naturally Aspirated
            Direct-Injection and Prechamber Engines
            From Pischinger, R. (19?6)                    84

Figure 26   Comparisons Between Nitric  Oxide Emis-
            sions From Models and Measured Results       86

Figure 2?   Test Facility Schematic Diagram              91

Figure 28   Nitrogen Oxide Emissions versus Overall
            Equivalence Ratio for Various Air  Injec-
            tion Timings With a Large Diameter
            Nozzle                                       125

Figure 29   Carbon Monoxide Emissions versus Overall
            Equivalence Ratio for Various Air Injec-
            tion Timings With a Large Diameter Nozzle    12&

Figure 30   Hydrocarbon Emissions versus Overall
            Equivalence Ratio for Various Air In-
            jection Timings With a Large Diameter
            Nozzle                                       I29

Figure 31   Measured  and Corrected Indicated Enthalpy
            Efficiency versus Overall Equivalence Ratio
            for Various Air Injection Timings With a
            Large Diameter Nozzle                        131

Figure 32   Nitrogen  Oxide Emissions for Various
            Homogeneous  Operating  Conditions             137

Figure 33   Nitrogen  Oxide Emissions versus Overall
            Equivalence  Ratio for  Selected Air Injec-
            tion  Operating Conditions With A  Small
            Diameter  Nozzle                             139
                            xi

-------
                                                      Page


Figure 3^-   Nitrogen Oxide Emissions versus  Start  of
            Air Injection for Overall Stoichiometric
            Equivalence Ratio With a Small Diameter
            Nozzle                                      142

Figure 35   Carbon Monoxide Emissions versus Overall
            Equivalence Ratio for Homogeneous Opera-
            tion                                        I45

Figure 36   Carbon Monoxide Emissions versus Overall
            Equivalence Ratio for Air Injection
            Operation With a Small Diameter  Nozzle      147

Figure 37   Carbon Monoxide Emissions Versus Start
            of Air Injection for Overall Stoichio-
            metric Equivalence Ratio With a  Small
            Diameter Nozzle                             148

Figure 38   Hydrocarbon Emissions versus Overall
            Equivalence Ratio for Homogeneous Opera-
            tion                                        149

Figure 39   Hydrocarbon Emissions versus Overall
            Equivalence Ratio for Air Injection Opera-
            tion with a Small Diameter Nozzle           151

Figure ^0   Hydrocarbon Emissions versus Start of
            Air Injection for Overall Stoichiometric
            Equivalence Ratio With a Small Diameter
            Nozzle                                      153

Figure 4-1   Measured Indicated Enthalpy Efficiency
            versus Overall Equivalence Ratio for
            Homogeneous Operation                       154

Figure k2   Measured Indicated Enthalpy Efficiency
            versus Overall Equivalence Ratio for Air
            Injection Operation With a Small Diameter
            Nozzle                                      155

Figure 4-3   Corrected Indicated Enthalpy Efficiency
            versus Overall Equivalence Ratio for Air
            Injection Operation With a Small Diameter
            Nozzle                                      157
 Figure  *44   Measured Indicated Enthalpy Efficiency
             versus Start of Air Injection for Stoichio-
             metric Equivalence Ratio With a Small Dia-
             meter Nozzle                                 158
                            xii

-------
 Figure 45
 Figure 46
 Figure 47
 Figure 48
Figure El
Indicated Mean Effective Pressure
versus Overall Equivalence Ratio for
Homogeneous Operation
                                                     Page
                                                     160
Measured Indicated Enthalpy Efficiency
Versus Start of Air Injection for Over-
all Stoichiometric Equivalence Ratio
With a Small Diameter Nozzle             162
Measured Indicated Mean Effective Pres-
sure Versus Start of Air Injection for
Overall Stoichiometric Equivalence
Ratio With a Small Diameter Nozzle
                                                     163
Cylinder Pressure Versus Crank Angle
for Homogeneous Operation, Air In-
jection During Combustion and Air In-
jection Before Combustion

Comparison of Measured and Calculated
Flow Restriction Pressures for the
Same Flow Rate
Figure Fl    A Sketch of the Air Injection Valve
166



226

228

-------
                     LIST OF TABLES



                                                      Page


TABLE I   Values of the Parameters for the Calcu-
          lations                                      28


TABLE II  Summary of Results for Air Injection
          Operation Extrapolated to a Stoichio-
          metric Fuel-Air Mixture                     141
                         xiv

-------
                     NOMENCLATURE





a       shape factor "a" of the Weibe combustion function
 c         r


a       shape factor "a" of the Weibe expansion function
 6


A       air or air with recirculated exhaust gases



ATDC    after top dead center



BTDC    before top dead center



CFM     cubic feet per minute



CFR     Cooperative Fuel Research Engine



CO      carbon monoxide



D       delayed mixing stratified charge engine



EGR     recirculated exhaust gas



F       equivalence ratio, fuel to air  ratio divided



        by the stoichiometric fuel to air  ratio



FE      equivalence ratio of the combustion products



        at the time of exhaust or the overall



        equivalence ratio



Fp      equivalence ratio products



H       homogeneous engine



HC      hydrocarbon



I       instantaneous mixing stratified charge engine



IEE     indicated enthalpy efficiency - percent



IMEP    indicated mean effective pressure  - psi



 ISNO    indicated  specific nitric  oxide -  g/ihp-hr



 L:A-P   delayed mixing  stratified  charge engine,  see



         Chapter III,  C



                          xv

-------
L;P-A


MBT

mc
me
NO
NOY
  J\.
7

Pl
P2
PE
Pi
ppm
PROCO

Rl
R2
R;P-A


RPM
 t
 TiR
 IOCS
 v(t)

 vcl
one member of the limited mixing stratified charge
engine group, see Chapter III,  C
maximum advance for best torque
shape factor "m" of the Weibe combustion function
shape factor "m" of the Weibe expansion function
nitric oxide
nitrogen oxide, all of the oxides of nitrogen
combined mixed products of system 1 and system 2
product system 1
product system 2
combined products at exhaust conditions
initial pressure of the reactants
part  per million
Ford  Programmed Combustion Engine
reactant system 1
reactant system 2
instantaneous mixing stratified  charge engine,
see Chapter  III, C
revolutions  per minute
time
time  of combustion
time  of expansion
initial temperature of  reactants
Texaco Controlled Combustion System Engine
volume function
 clearance  volume of combustion chamber
                          xvi

-------
vd(t)   displaced volume at time "t"
VT(t)   total volume of combustion chamber at time  "t"
 Q      overall equivalence ratio
<|>c      carbureted equivalence ratio
9si     start of air injection in crank angle degrees
0gp     spark- timing in crank angle degrees
                        XVIX

-------
                       CHAPTER I




                     INTRODUCTION





     The oxides of nitrogen emissions from vehicle internal



combustion engines are one of the causes of photochemical-



smog.  Smog is produced by the interaction of nitrogen



oxide, hydrocarbons, air and sunlight.  In an attempt to



prevent this form of air pollution, the Federal Government



has set standards for the emissions from motor vehicles.



Nitrogen oxide emissions of conventional spark ignition



engines are difficult to deal with because they tend to



be large at high efficiency and high power operating



conditions.



     Our general approach to the problem was to study



engine processes, doing theoretical calculations to



determine if the nitrogen oxide emissions could be re-



duced while maintaining satisfactory engine performance



The most promising concept was then selected for experi-



mental evaluation.



     A computer program approximating conventional homo-



geneous engines was used to provide a better understand-



ing of nitric  oxide emissions.  The computer program was



also used to determine how unusual operating conditions



influence nitric oxide emissions.  A second computer pro-



gram was used  to study nitric oxide emissions of stratified

-------
charge engines.  From these studies it appeared that the
delayed mixing stratified charge engine concept had the
most potential for limiting nitric oxide emissions and
maintaining engine performance.
     The delayed mixing stratified charge engine concept
consists of-having all of the fuel concentrated in a
rich region where combustion is initiated.  After com-
bustion of the rich mixture is completed, the lean region
consisting of air or air with recirculated exhaust gas
is gradually and thoroughly mixed into the rich products
of combustion.
     When the nitrogen oxide emissions of various types
of internal combustion engines were examined, it was
apparent that the delayed mixing concept was part of a
unique group of engines.  This group of engines uses
similar principles of operation and has similar trends
in the nitrogen oxide emissions.  The nitrogen oxide
emissions of this group tend to be lower than other en-
gines for operation with near stoichiometric fuel-air
ratios.  The other group of engines is usually operated
lean to limit nitrogen oxide emissions.
     The experimental program is intended to simulate
the combustion processes of the delayed mixing strati-
fied charge engine concept.  The experimental engine was
not intended to represent a practical engine configuration

-------
"but was, instead, a means for testing the delayed mixing
concept,  A single cylinder (CFR) engine was modified to
include an air injection valve which could inject air at
the desired time in the engine cycle.  The experimental
engine was operated at a variety of conditions which
provided the results necessary to evaluate the delayed
mixing concept.

-------
                        SUMMARY

     The theoretical studies of engine' power,  fuel
economy and emissions shown in Chapter II indicate that
the delayed mixing stratified charge engine concept is
capable of limiting the nitric oxide emissions while
having reasonable efficiency and specific power.  The
delayed mixing process consists of rich combustion fol-
lowed by air being mixed into the rich products.  During
the initial phase of rich combustion little nitric oxide
is formed due to the lack of oxygen in the charge.  When
the air is mixed into the rich products of combustion,
two factors can be used to limit nitric oxide.  First,
if the final overall fuel-air ratio is kept near stoichio-
metric, the nitric oxide will be low because the mixture
is rich for most of its kinetic history.  However, if
the overall fuel-air ratio is made lean, the product
mixture will have both the high temperatures and oxygen
required for nitric oxide formation.  With delayed mixing
and a lean overall fuel-air mixture, the nitric oxide
emissions can be very high.  The second factor which
can be used to limit nitric oxide formation is the time
at which expansion cooling stops the nitric oxide
kinetics.  If the end of the active nitric oxide kinetic
period were to occur before the air is added  to the rich
products, the final nitric oxide concentration would  be

-------
that associated with rich combustion.  Likewise, as the
end of the active nitric oxide kinetic period is extended
into the mixing process, the final nitric oxide concen-
tration will "be more affected by the mixing process.
     It is shown in Chapter III that some real engines
have low nitrogen oxide emissions when operated near
stoichiometric fuel-air ratios.  Those engines and the
delayed mixing concept have similar combustion processes.
This group has been defined as the limited mixing strat-
fied charge engine group because the products of combus-
tion are by some means temporarily prevented from mixing
with the rest of the charge.  The mixing process which
follows combustion is characterized by the products
mixing into the air, or by the air mixing into the pro-
ducts, or by some intermixing process.  Engines are
judged to be part of the limited mixing group by examin-
ing the influence of fuel-air ratio on the nitrogen oxide
emissions and by  examining  the combustion processes.  The
Ford Programmed Combustion  (PROCO) Engine, the Newhall
Engine and the divided  chamber diesel engine are included
in the limited mixing stratified charge engine group.
     The delayed mixing stratified charge engine concept
was simulated by a single cylinder (CFR) engine with pro-
visions for air injection.  A rich charge is drawn  into
the combustion chamber  through the normal inlet valve.

-------
The equivalence ratio of this charge is called the car-
bureted equivalence ratio.  At the desired time in the
cycle the air is injected which reduces the equivalence
ratio to the value called the overall equivalence ratio.
Details of the experimental engine, the entire test
facility and instrumentation are presented in Chapter IV.
     The experimental engine was operated with air in-
jection occurring after combustion to simulate the de-
layed mixing processes.  The experimental results are
presented in Chapter V.  A comparison can be made of the
emissions for homogeneous operation and for delayed mixing
operation at the same overall equivalence ratios.  The  de-
layed mixing operation is much lower in nitrogen  oxide
emissions, lower in hydrocarbon  emissions and about the
same in carbon monoxide emissions.  From the hydrocarbon
and carbon monoxide emissions, it  can be concluded that
the combustion process is completed.  The magnitude of
the nitrogen oxide emissions  from  the delayed mixing
operation  is similar  to that  of  homogeneous  operation
if its overall  equivalence  ratio were  equal  to  the car-
bureted equivalence ratio of  the delayed mixing engine.
Apparently, little additional nitrogen oxide is formed
due to air injection,  because the  completion of the  com-
bustion occurs  late  in the  expansion when the temperatures
 are relatively low.   Results with  a large  diameter or
with a  small diameter air injection nozzle were similar.

-------
     The indicated enthalpy efficiency of delayed mixing
operation is very low compared to that of homogeneous
operation at the same overall equivalence ratio.  Since
the completion of combustion occurs late in the expan-
sion little additional work can be obtained.  Attempts
were made to inject the air during the combustion pro-
cess in order to extract more work and find the trade-
off between nitrogen oxide emissions and efficiency.
These experiments resulted in the discovery that air in-
jection during combustion would disrupt the combustion
process.  In a sense the air injection would tend to
blow out the flame.  As a result the hydrocarbon emis-
sions increased, the carbon monoxide emissions  increased,
the efficiency remained low and the nitrogen oxide  in-
creased.  Other  tests were run with air injection be-
fore combustion.  In these tests, all the  emissions were
similar to  those of homogeneous operation  at the same
overall equivalence ratio.  The efficiency approached
that of homogeneous operation at the  same  overall
equivalence ratio.   Efficiency was less than with homo-
geneous operation because  of  the greater heat  transfer
rates due to motion of  the charge  caused by air injection.
The motion  of  the charge also  resulted  in  very stable  and
rapid combustion.
     Another factor which  reduces  the efficiency farther
is the work required to compress the  injected  air.   In

-------
the test facility the air is compressed separately and
injected as desired.  The measured power and correspond-
ing measured efficiency do not include the work required
to compress the injected air.  Estimates of the air in-
jection compression power are made and subtracted from
the measured power to obtain the corrected power and
corresponding corrected efficiency.  Generally the mea-
sured efficiency is slightly greater than homogeneous
operation at the carbureted equivalence ratio and the
corrected efficiency is lower.
     In order to evaluate the potential of the delayed
mixing concept, it is necessary to know if the low
efficiency is an inherent result of the combustion pro-
cess or if it is a result of the means used to simulate
the combustion process.  In the Newhall engine, the PROCO
engine and the divided chamber diesels the combustion
process, which is similar to the delayed mixing concept,
is achieved through the use of fuel injection.  Thus, it
would seem possible to devise a delayed mixing engine
that would use fuel injection instead of air injection
to obtain stratification.  The resulting efficiency would
not include an external compressor.  Much of the efficiency
of the experimental engine can be attributed to the air in-
jection which is the means selected to simulate the delayed
mixing process.
                           8

-------
     A certain amount of inefficiency is due to the com-
bustion process itself.  The fact that the combustion is
delayed will mean that it will occur later in the expan-
sion and consequently be less efficient.  The Newhall
engine, El-Messir (1973). has a lower efficiency than a
corresponding homogeneous engine.  The divided chamber
diesel, Obert (1968), has a lower indicated enthalpy
efficiency than a corresponding open chamber diesel.
     The calculation of both the efficiency and the IMEP
depend upon the power of the engine.  For the same
fuel flow rate, the efficiency and the IMEP will be pro-
portional to each other.  A comparison can be made between
operation with air injection after combustion and homo-
geneous operation at the same mass flow rate of fuel
and the same total mass of air.  The low efficiency
associated with air injection after combustion results
in correspondingly low IMEP.
     The measured IMEP of the experimental engine simu-
lating delayed mixing was found to be somewhat greater
than that of homogeneous operation.  The reason for
the greater IMEP is that the carbureted air flow rate
was maintained constant with air injection adding to
the total mass of the charge.  In a sense the air injec-
tion is supercharging the engine.

-------
     In summary, the delayed mixing stratified charge en-
gine concept is an effective method of controlling the
nitrogen oxide emissions.  The carbon monoxide emissions
are equivalent to those of homogeneous engines and the
hydrocarbons are lower. The disadvantage of the delayed
mixing concept is its low efficiency inherent in the
combustion process.
                           10

-------
                      CONCLUSIONS

1.  The computer models of homogeneous and stratified
    charge engines indicated that the delayed mixing
    stratified charge engine concept could be used to
    limit nitric oxide emissions, while having reason-
    able specific power and efficiency.
2.  In general engines can be divided into two groups
    representing markedly different responses of
    nitrogen oxide emissions to changes in the overall
    fuel-air ratio.  The first group is characterized
    by producing the maximum nitrogen oxide (either ppm
    or g/kw-hr) near stoichiometric fuel-air ratios or
    slightly lean.  The second group, which includes
    the delayed mixing concept, is characterized by
    producing the maximum nitrogen oxide emissions at
    leaner fuel-air ratios and being less sensitive to
    changes in the fuel-air ratio.
3.  Experimental simulation of the delayed mixing strati-
    fied charge engine concept has shown that nitrogen
    oxides are much lower than for a corresponding homo-
    geneous engine.  The emissions of hydrocarbons are
    lower than  for a corresponding  homogeneous  engine, while
    the carbon monoxide emissions are about the same.
    Efficiency is much lower than for a similar homogen-
    eous engine.
                           11

-------
4.  The difference "between the predictions of reasonable
    efficiency and the low efficiency found with the
    simulated delayed mixing engine is due to the late
    time in the expansion when the combustion process
    is completed and due to external work required to
    compress the injection air.
5«  Air injection resulted in increased motion of the
    charge which increased heat transfer rates.
6.  Air injection during combustion disturbed the com-
    bustion process which resulted in greater hydro-
    carbon  emissions, greater carbon monoxide emissions,
    and lower efficiency. '
7.  Air injection before combustion resulted in emissions
    similar to those for a corresponding homogeneous
    operation and efficiencies slightly below the
    corresponding homogeneous operation.  The combus-
    tion process was found to be very rapid with re-
    duced cycle to cycle peak pressure variations.
8.  The major disadvantage of the delayed mixing
    stratified charge  engine concept is its inherent
    low efficiency resulting from the extended combus-
    tion process.  Attempts at reducing the combustion
    period by  injecting air earlier resulted  in  disturbing
     the rich combustion process without increasing the
    efficiency.
                           12

-------
                       CHAPTER II
      A THEORETICAL STUDY OF NITRIC  OXIDE EMISSIONS
            FROM INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES
A.   INTRODUCTION  '
      It is  the objective of this  study  to establish  a  con-
cept for an internal  combustion engine  that would limit
the  nitric  oxide emissions  with minimal sacrifice in
specific power and efficiency.  Initially the work was
aimed at understanding the  formation of nitric oxide.  Of
the  various computer  models which were  developed, the most
significant are the homogeneous and stratified charge en-
gine models.   A paper which describes these engine models
entitled "A Search for a Low Nitric Oxide Engine" was pre-
sented at the  Central States Section of the Combustion
Institute in March, 19?4, (unpublished)  and at the Inter-
national Stratified Charge Engine Conference in October,
1974,  SAE 7^1172, Evers, Myers and Uyehara (197*0.   Excerpts
from the paper are presented to describe  the nitric  oxide
emissions from homogeneous and stratified charge engines.
     A large number of combustion and expansion configura-
tions and processes were  studied where exhaust NO  concen-
                                                 X.
trations might vary by several orders of magnitude.   Be-
cause of  the number of calculations needed short computa-
tional times were judged more important than a high degree
                           13

-------
of precision.  It was further felt that after identifi-
cation of low NO  configurations and processes which
                Jv
also had reasonable efficiency and specific power, more
detailed and more precise simulations could be run if
desired.  Consequently, a simplified computer program
was developed.
     In developing the simplified computer program it
was deliberately kept flexible and not identified with
a particular engine configuration.  This resulted in
the arbitrary specification of a number of input items.
However, in general, when specifying input items a
specific engine "configuration" is typically in mind.

B.  NITRIC OXIDE KINETICS
     The kinetics of nitric oxide have been used by many
investigators in predicting the nitric oxide concentra-
tion in the products of combustion.  The method requires
the selection of appropriate elementary chemical re-
actions, the corresponding reaction rates, and a group
of simplifying assumptions.
     Newhall and Shahed (1971) showed that the two elemen-
tary chemical equations A and B (called the Zeldovich
mechanism) satisfactorily predicted the nitric oxide
concentration of fuel-lean mixtures but somewhat under-
estimated the concentration of fuel-rich mixtures.
                           14

-------
                    N2 + 0 £ NO + N            (A)
                    02 + N £ NO + 0            (B)

The tests were performed in a closed constant volume cy-
lindrical combustion chamber.  In order to perform the
kinetic calculations, Newhall assumed that all of the
species in the combustion products except nitric oxide
were at equilibrium concentrations.
     The Zeldovich mechanism is used for all the kinetic
calculations  presented in this chapter.  The equations are
easily handled in  computer calculations.  For more infor-
mation about  the  method used to calculate nitric oxide
concentrations see Appendix A.  Additional equations can
be added to the Zeldovich mechanism in hopes of improving
the accuracy  of kinetic calculations.  Since we are look-
ing for large changes in nitric oxide levels, the Zeldovich
mechanism is  sufficient.
     Lavoie et al.  (1970) used an expanded set of elemen-
tary chemical reactions which  added equations C through F
to the Zeldovich  mechanism.
                   N  + OH £ NO + H             (C)
                   H  + N20 £ N2 + OH           (D)
                   0  + N20 - N£ + 02           (E)
                   0  + N£0 £ NO + NO           (F)
They also showed that the N and NgO concentrations exist
nearer a steady state value than an equilibrium value.
                           15

-------
Thus they assumed that N and N20 exist  at the steady state
concentrations and all the other species, except NO, exist
at equilibrium concentrations.  A computer model based on
this kinetics mechanism was found to be in agreement with
internal combustion engine test results.  The comparison
was made for- fuel-lean mixtures,  No comparisons were
offered for fuel-rich mixtures.  Lavoie pointed out that
equations D, E and F are only important for lean mixtures
at low temperatures.
     A thorough review of nitric oxide kinetics done by De
Soete (1975) concluded that equations C and D had little
effect for equivalence ratios less than 1.5 and temperatures
greater than 3240°R  (1800°K).   DeSoto's choice of the most
acceptable set of kinetics equations are the Zeldovich
mechanism (equations A and B) plus equations E and F.
     Fenimore (1971) showed that for fuel-rich hydrocar-
bon flames the Zeldovich mechanism did not predict the
nitric oxide formed  in the flame.  He suggested that
nitric oxide formed  in the flame was due to a different
kinetic mechanism such as equations G and H.  The nitric
oxide generated by that mechanism is called "prompt NO".
                   CH + N2 £ HCN + N            (G)
                   G2 + N2 * 2CN                (H)
     The assumption  of equilibrium concentration of atomic
oxygen in the flame  was investigated by  Iverach et al.
                            16

-------
(1973)•   They measured the nitric oxide concentration in



a rich premixed flame and "back calculated the Zeldovich



mechanism to obtain the atomic oxygen concentration re-



quired to produce that quantity of nitric oxide.  Through



other measurements they were able to determine the actual



atomic oxygen present in the flame.  A comparison shows



that the atomic oxygen concentration required by the



Zeldovich mechanism  is orders of magnitude greater than



the actual  concentration for hydrocarbon flames and about



equal for CO/H2 flames.  They concluded that prompt NO



was formed  by a different kinetic mechanism as suggested



by Fenimore.  Their  choice  for the mechanism is equation



G and I.





                     C + N2  ? CN  + N                 (I)





      By  only using the Zeldovich mechanism  in  our calcu-



lations  we  expect to somewhat underestimate  the nitric



oxide* concentrations for  fuel-rich  combustion.





C.  COMPUTER MODELS



      Since  the  nitric oxide concentration  is not markedly



affected by the intake,  compression,or exhaust processes,



they were not included  in the  computer program in the



 interest of reducing the  computer  time.  Calculations of



 specific power and efficiency required estimation  of the



work  of  these processes.  The intake and exhaust work was




                            17

-------
assumed to "be zero.  An isentropic compression to the state
specified at the beginning of combustion was used to  esti-
mate the work of compression.  It was further decided not
to include heat transfer in the computer programs.  Ne-
glecting the heat transfer shortens the computer time while
resulting in greater pressures, temperatures and an over-
estimate of the nitric oxide concentration.  In essence,
the approach was to treat the gases as being in one or
more closed adiabatic containers of uniform pressure with
specified initial conditions and an arbitrarily specified
expansion and combustion process.
     1.  One System Model
     The one system model is intended to describe homo-
geneous combustion similar to a conventional homogeneous
charge spark ignition engine, but in a general manner.
To describe the regions within the one-system model we
considered two approaches.  In both approaches the re-
actants were assumed to be one homogeneous region.  The
mixed products approach assumes the products to be one
homogeneous region with constant properties throughout,
including pressure and temperature.  As new products  of
combustion are formed they are instantaneously mixed  with
existing products which can change the average properties
of the product region.  The unmixed products approach
assumes the product region to be made up of a number  of
                            18

-------
small subregions each with its own individual properties.
Each subregion could have a different temperature but they
all have the same pressure.  As products of combustion are
formed they are grouped into the small subregions which
maintain their own identity and do not mix with the other
products.
     An advantage of the unmixed products approach is that
temperature gradients and their influence on nitric oxide
formation  can be shown in the product region.  Blumberg
and Kummer (1971) compared the nitric oxide formed by
the mixed  and unmixed products approach.  They found the
ratio of nitric oxide predicted by the mixed products
approach to nitric oxide predicted by the unmixed pro-
ducts approach to vary by  only ± 1?$ over a range of
equivalence ratios from  0.7  to 1.3-
     The mixed products  approach was selected for these
calculations because  it  was  sufficiently accurate and re-
quired  less computer  time.   The computer time for the
mixed products approach  is  shorter since it  is only neces-
sary to keep track of two  regions, products and  reactants.
With the unmixed products  approach it  is necessary to keep
track of the reactants plus  the many small subregions of
products.
     The thermodynamic equations and computer programs used
 to describe the one-system model are given in Appendix B.

                           19

-------
     2.  Two System Model
     The two system model is used to represent nonhomo-
geneous combustion as occurs in stratified charge engines.
The program consiste of two one-system models each capable
of handling two regions, reactants and products.  As is
shown in Figure 1, initially both system 1 and system 2
are homogeneous reactants.
     In the general case, reactants in both systems would
be converted to products but not necessarily at the same
rate.  After some interval to be specified (called the
time of combination) the two systems are combined to form
a single system having three regions as shown in Figure
1.  The reactants remaining in system 1 or 2 at the time
of combination are maintained intact but the products
from both system 1 and 2 are immediately mixed.  See
Appendix C for details of  the  two  system model and  computer
program.
     All calculations reported herein used the special
cases of either delayed or instantaneous mixing models
as  shown  in Figure 1.  In both the delayed and in-
stantaneous mixing models the reactants in system 2(A2)
are either air or a homogeneous mixture of air plus ex-
haust gas recirculation (EGR) of exhaust composition.
For delayed mixing the combination of system 1 and system
2 occurred immediately but Ag did not start to mix with
                           20

-------
  General Case:

-System 1
-System 2
                       time of combination
 E -


v(t)
Reactant System 1

Reactant System 2
Product System 1
Product System 2
Combined mixed pro-
 ducts of System 1
 and 2
Combined Products
at Exhaust Condi-
tions
- Volume function
  (crank and piston)
   Instantaneous Mixing  Case:
                                               - Air or air
                                                 plus EGR
   Delayed Mixing Case:
   Figure  1     Two  System  Model  of  the Stratified
                   Charge  Engine  Configurations
                              21

-------
products P, until system 1 was entirely burnt.  Then A2 is
mixed with P-, at a specified rate until complete mixing
occurs and only products having the exhaust air-fuel ratio
exist in the system.
     In instantaneous mixing, combination occurs immediate-
ly; R, is converted to P, at a specified rate; and P-, is
instantaneously mixed with Ap.  To illustrate, if the rich
products of system 1  are mixed with A2 (let A2 be air),
the composition of  [A2 + SAP,] (see Figure 1) will change
continuously from that of air to that  of exhaust products
as R, is burnt.  This is in contrast with delayed mixing
where, if A2 is air and R, is a rich mixture, the com-
position of  [P, + £AA21 will gradually change from rich
products to products having exhaust composition.
D.  POTENTIAL ENGINE CONFIGURATION
     1.  Homogeneous Charge-Conventional SI Engine
     As indicated previously, when specifying  initial and
other conditions necessary to run the  program,one tends
to have a  specific engine configuration in mind.  The
first configuration which was studied  primarily for re-
ference purposes was basically the conventional spark
ignition engine with a wide open throttle.  In order to
use the program for this configuration, the program re-
quires that  the pressure, temperature  and composition at
the start  of combustion, the rate or  extent of combustion
                            22

-------
and a function "to describe the system volume "be specified.



     The Weibe (1956) function was selected to represent



both the extent of combustion and the system volume.



Figure 2 illustrates use of the Weibe function to describe



the extent of combustion.  Three variables are required to



define a specific combustion process. For the calculations



presented  the  time  of  combustion  (t )  was varied while m
                                     C                    \-»


equaled  two  and a equaled five.  Also  shown in  Figure  2
                  C


is  a  cosine  burning  law which sometimes is used  to  re-



present  combustion,  Heywood,  et al.  (1973)-



     The expansion function also uses the Weibe  function



to describe  the  displacement  volume  (see Figure  3)•  The



total volume of  the  system is  equal  to  the displacement



volume plus  the  clearance  volume.  A clearance volume was



selected which  is equivalent  to a compression ratio of



nine.  Since the  expansion function  shows an increasing



volume from  the  clearance  volume to  the maximum  volume



this  is  analogous to a  crank  and piston at top dead center



and at bottom dead center. Both the time of expansion  (t )
                                                          "


and m_ were  varied while ao was held constant at five.
      c                     e


      The initial condition of the one-system model  can  be



defined  by its  pressure, temperature, fuel-to-air equiva-



lence ratio, fuel composition and the amount of  recircula-



ted exhaust  gas.  The fuel was taken to be GgH-,^.   It was



assumed  that the fuel-to-air  equivalence ratio for  the





                            23

-------
in
   0)
  CO
o

to
   o
   •»—
   o
 II
 [5

•s
  i
  to
C JD
£ E
x o
UJO
      Wiebe Function :

         Extent of Combustion (a) =

         l.-e-ac(J-)(mc+l]
                V'c/
                  .4     .6

                 Time(t)
.8
         Time of Combustion (tc)

         —Time of Combustion
1.0
 Figure 2    The Combustion Function for the
           One-System and Two-System Models
                24

-------
  Total VolJvTit)j = Clearance Vol. (Vc))

                   •f Displaced Vol. [Vd(t)]

          VT(t)    VC|   ,   Vd(t)
o


ID
CD
U

52
o.
00
       Where:

          VCI
          Vd(te)   Compression

                      Ratio

          Vdlt)
        0
0
.2
                     .4     .6

                     Time(t)
.8
Figure 3
            Time of  Expansion  (te)

            — Time of Expansion  —-]
   The Expansion Function for the One-
   System Model (Weibe)  and the  Two-
   System Model (Crank and Piston)
                   25

-------
recirculated exhaust gas is the same as that of the reac-



tants.



     Three parameters were selected to characterize the



performance of an engine.  These are indicated specific



nitric oxide (ISNO) which relates the pollution level to



engine power,, indicated enthalpy efficiency (IEE) which



measures the utilization of the fuel, and indicated mean



effective pressure (IMEP) which is related to specific



power output and thus" relative engine size.  These terms



are defined in Appendix D which also shows how the compres-



sion work was calculated. See Appendix I for SI units.



     One set of calculations represented a study of seven



independent variables.  Four of these variables were the



initial conditions, two of these variables were t  and m
                                                 e      e


from the expansion function and one variable was t  from
                                                  \*r


the combustion function.  Each of seven variables was



assigned a high and a low level.  All possible combination



of these variables were calculated (2'  = 128 runs).



     From the seven variable-two level calculations, it is



possible to establish that the four major variables in-



fluencing nitric oxide levels are the fuel-to-air equiva-



lence ratio, the initial temperature of the reactants, the



exhaust gas recirculation, and the time of expansion.



Consequently, another parametric set of calculations was
1.  As discussed by Lauck et al. (1962), the indicated

    enthalpy efficiency is numerically equal to thermal

    efficiency which is more commonly but  incorrectly used,




                            26

-------
performed with these four variables.  The values of the
variables used in these calculations are shown in Table I.
A total of 135 calculations were made to represent all
possible combinations.
     The results of the calculations are presented in
Figures ^ and 5«  In each curve shown in Figure 4,indicated
specific nitric oxide  is plotted versus indicated mean
effective pressure for the  fifteen  combinations of equiva-
lence ratio and fraction of exhaust gas recirculation.
Each of the nine curves represent one of the  nine com-
binations of the three values  of time of expansion and
the three values of  initial temperature of  the reactants.
     The  first  observation  is  that  the nine indicated
specific  nitric oxide  curves are very similar in  shape to
each other.  Also, not unexpectedly, only at high equiva-
lence ratios  (rich mixtures) or low equivalence ratios
 (lean mixtures) does  the  indicated  specific nitric oxide
reach desirably low  levels. There  does not exist some
fortuitous  combination of variables which excludes the
 influence of  equivalence  ratio.  Exhaust gas recircula-
 tion  in combination  with  either rich  or lean mixtures
 contributes greatly  to the  reduction  of nitric oxide.
      The  addition  of exhaust gas  recirculation or cooler
 initial temperatures results  in lower product temperatures
 and consequently lower nitric  oxide concentrations.
                              27

-------
                       TABLE I

     Values of the Parameters for the Calculations

                Show in Figures 4 and 5
       Parameters
Equivalence Ratio  (F)

Initial Temperature of
 the Reactants (T-R)

Exhaust Gas Recirculation
 (EGR)

Initial Pressure  (P.)

Time of Expansion  (t )-sec
Expansion Shape (me)
                (ae)

Time of Combustion
 (tc)-sec

Combustion Shape  (mr)
             Values^

.6, .8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4

800.°R, 1200.°R, 1400.°R
(444.°K), (667.°K), (778°K)


.0, .1, .2

250. psi (172400. N/m2)

.005,        .025,       .05
(^6000 rpm)(^1200 rpm)(^ 600
                        rpm)
1.
5.
.05

2.
5.
                           28

-------
         INITIAL TEMPERATURE OF THE  REACTANTS  ( T,R)

          I400°R                 I200°R                800°R
—.  10



ft

£s

8g..
*> 
m
q
   Ol
   001 »o ' «io ' 120 ' i*
              »O HO WO  200

            IMEP-pti
*-.  10

 E
 a.
g
(O


1
X
UJ

UL
o

UJ
ll
 w o .1
 9> 2
 S »

m
CVJ

Q «
      to 100 110 MO  ieo leo 200

            IMEP-pti
                               *0 DO 120  MO KO *O ZOO    KO 200 Z2O (40

                                     IMEP-p«i                  IMEP-ptl
                               80 IOO 120  I4O  KO t*O 2OO

                                     IMEP-p»i
•0200i202402S02BOMOI20

       IMEP-pti
 E
 Q.


 O .

 O Jr

 O I

 «> ^
 So,
 10 s
 10 -
 o
 Q
      80  IOO  120 140 ISO  180 200  °°' 80 IOO  120 140 160  180  200    »0 200 220 240 2*0  280 JOO KO
            IMEP-psi
                                   IMEP-psi
                                                         IMEP-psi
        Figure  4.
                   Indicated specific nitric  oxide

                   versus  indicated  mean  effective  pressure

                   (i:iEP)  for homogeneous charge  engine

                   configuration .
                                29

-------
u>
o
      60
50
     LU
      40
      30-
20
                     INITIAL TEMPERATURE  OF  THE  REACTANTS (TIR)
               1400° R
             I
                 l ,  1
                        I ,  I
         8O  100
120  140  160
 IMEP-psi
                    180  200
                                    60
                                    50
                            UJ
                            UJ
                                    40
                                    30
                                    20
                                        I200°R
                                                PI  o
                                                itil  uii  3,
                                                1   'F.I.2.'
                                                      /
                                                            7
                                                   /   /
                                                            1
                                      80  IOO  120  140  160
                                              IMEP-psi
                                                        ISO  200
                                                                 20
                                                            800°R
180 200  220 240  260  280 300  320
          IMEP-psi
                       Figure  5.   Indicated enthalpy efficiency (IBE)  versus
                                   indicated mean effective pressure (IMLP)
                                   for  homogeneous charge engine configuration.

-------
     Peak specific nitric oxide levels occur just to the
lean side of stoichiometric except for high engine speeds.
The peak nitric oxide levels occur in the lean region be-
cause of the greater oxygen concentration and high asso-
ciated temperatures.  As the mixtures become leaner, the
flame temperatures decrease substantially and so do the
nitric oxide rate constants and the amount of nitric oxide
formed.  However, note the change in the effect of EGR
(at F = 1.0, for example) from the lower right curves
hand to the upper left hand curves in Figure b.
     The indicated mean effective pressure is changed by
those factors which  influence the specific volume of the
charge or the amount of fuel.  Reduced  temperature, higher
fuel  air ratios in  lean  region, or less  exhaust gas  recir-
culation all result  in a  greater  indicated mean  effective
pressure.   The  magnitude  of the IMEP  is greater  than
conventional spark  ignition engines because  the  initial
conditions  resulted  in a  larger mass  of charge.   Calcu-
lations with a  smaller charge  have  the  same  trends.
      In  the computer model, a  decrease   in the  time of
expansion  results  in lower nitric oxide concentrations
because  less time  is available for  nitric oxide  formation.
In the model we have assumed no  heat  transfer.   In an
actual  engine,  the  amount of  heat transfer also  depends on
the time  of expansion (or cycle  time)  and a decrease in the
                            31

-------
time  of  expansion  (decreased  cycle  time) would  cause de-
 creased  heat  transfer  which will  tend to  increase  the  level
 of nitric oxide  concentration.  Actual nitric oxide  concen-
 trations would reflect a  balance  of these  effects.  Since
 any engine coupled to  the wheels  by conventional trans-
 missions would operate over a range of expansion times,
 it would be difficult  to  take advantage of possible bene-
 fits of  rapid expansion to limit  nitric oxide formation.
      The indicated enthalpy efficiency curves,  Figure  5*
 have well known  shapes.   Changes  in indicated mean effec-
 tive pressure stretch  the curves.  The indicated enthalpy
 efficiency is seen to  be  mainly a function of equivalence
 ratio with a  small change due to  exhaust  gas recircula-
 tion. At high equivalence ratios the efficiency drops
 due to unburnt fuel.   As  the  mixture becomes leaner  than
 stoichiometric the efficiency increases because of the
 lower temperatures and the accompanying reduction  in
 specific heats and dissociation.

      2.   Stratified Charge Engine
      Generally,  in a stratified charge engine having the
 objective of reducing NO  'emissions, combustion takes
                         .A.
 place in a rich  region and the rich products and air are
 combined in a prescribed way to give a stoichiometric (or
 leaner)  exhaust  mixture.   The two cases - delayed  and in-
 stantaneous mixing - described under the  two-system model
 represent two extremes of mixing and were used  to  study

                            32

-------
stratified charge engine performance.  Crank and piston ex-
pansion was used for the two-system model because of the
minor effect  of  changes  in  the  expansion  function had on NO.
     The instantaneous mixing model is somewhat similar to
an engine having a prechamber in which the rich reactants
are burned.  The products leave the prechamber and are
rapidly mixed with the air  in the main chamber.  In the
instantaneous mixing model  the mixing would be instantaneous,
the pressure  in both chambers would be the same and the
volumes of both the prechamber and the main chamber would
change.  In the delayed mixing model the  air would be in
the prechamber.  After combustion, air would gradually be
forced out of the prechamber and  into the products by
changes in the volumes of the main chamber and prechamber.
                                           2
     Let us define the time of  heat release  to include
both the energy  release  due to  rich combustion and the
energy release when additional  air is supplied to the pro-
ducts of rich combustion.   Note that heat release does not
include energy release due  to changing chemical equilibrium.
The first computations that were  run compared the effects
of changing the  time of  heat release on delayed and in-
stantaneous mixing  (see  Figure  6), when the exhaust pro-
ducts are stoichiometric and the  overall  exhaust gas re-
circulation is twenty percent.  The relative shapes of the
 2.  The  term heat release  is used in a descriptive  sense,
    and  refers  to the  analogy between combustion and  heat
    addition processes.
                            33

-------
  100
   10
 T I
 Q.
    .I
 C/)
   .01
                       n
                   QoL/3
  .00
        80   100
120   140   160
 IMEP-psi
                             180   200
Figure  6
The Influence of the Times  of Heat Release
for a Homogeneous Charge Engine Operating with
F * 1.0  and EGR = .2 and the Delayed and
Instantaneous Mixing Stratified Charge Engine
Configuration Operating with Fexhaugt =1.0
and EGRoverall = .2
                       34

-------
                Delayed  Mixing

                     D,      D:
 D
c
o

o ^
-L. ±-
co nn
to"-1
o
^
1.0

.8
.6
.4
.2

0
1 C_
X*^ ^*** *^ ***
xx^<,4
 co GQ o
 O    '^
           .002  .004  .006  .008
               Time-seconds
.010
          Instantaneous Mixing  and
         Homogeneous Combustion
                            H2i2  Hsls
            .002  .004  .006  .008
              Time-seconds
.010
Figure 7   A Comparison of the Heat Release for
          Instantaneous Mixing,  Delayed Mixing
          and Homogeneous Combustion Corresponding
          to Figure 6,
                 35

-------
heat release curves are shown in Figure ?•  It should "be



noted that,as the duration of heat release was increased,



the major amount of combustion for instantaneous mixing



occurred considerably later than that for delayed mixing.



This occurred because,in the delayed case,only the period



of mixing and not the duration of the rich combustion was



changed.



     In spite of the relatively delayed combustion for the



instantaneous mixing case, it shows significantly higher



NO  for the same IMEP.  The reasons for this unexpected
  JL.


result is that for instantaneous mixing the product mixture



[&2 + SAP-,] is always in the lean region  starting with es-



sentially air passing through the relatively high NO  for-
                                                    j\.


mation zone of around 0.8 equivalence ratio and  finally



reaching a F = 1.0.  For delayed mixing the product mixture



[P, + ZAApl is on the rich side starting  with F  = 1.^ and



ending with F = 1.0.



     The next set of computations were run with  a constant



time of heat release but the overall EGR  and overall fuel-



air ratio were varied.  Recirculated exhaust gas was



assigned the composition corresponding to the final over-



all equivalence ratio.  Heat release patterns for both



delayed and instantaneous mixing are shown on the top of



Figure 8 and corresponds to Dg and  I~ in  Figure  ?•  Also



included in Figure 8, on the bottom, is the variation of





                            36

-------
c
o
o ^
•*• ^**
tj
$ QQ
o
^~
^

"~O-
O Li-
CE •£
o
(D 3
O "O
c o
— - rT
o
"5 .c
cr-*-
LU M-
^>
1.0
.8
.6
.4


Q
Delayed <,•**"*"'
- Mixing-j^ ^**' ionn DD^/I
s~*~~'/ l^ivjvj r\ i ivi
/ '
- 1 /
» y ^""Instantaneous
// Mixing
^•< 1,1,1,1,1
0 .002 .004 .006 .008 .010
Time-seconds
1.6
1.4
1.2
1.0

.8

.6
.4

o
^Delayed Mixing P, + ZAA2
-~" """•^N|^
\XV
N. ^^ Exhaust F=I.O
X. „. ^. M«— — — — —
^•- \
/ v.
/ x^^ Exhaust F = . 6
/ .^ —•"*"*• 	 ~~~"
/ s^ I20° RPM
/ ' EGRn=0
/ /-^-Instantaneous u
// Mixing A2+2AP,
             .002   .004   .006   .008  .010
                Time -seconds
Figure 8    The Mass Fraction Burned and the Product
           Mixture Equivalence  Ratio (for Two of
           the Nine Conditions) Corresponding to
           Figure  9 and Figure  10
                   37

-------
100
  INSTANTANEOUS  MIXING
 10
.01
.001
     1  I
  I   I  I
1
I  i   I  i	I	L
     80   100  \20   140   160   180  200
               IMEP-psi
Figure 9    Indicated Specific Nitric Oxide
          for Instantaneous Mixing Stratified
          Charge Engine Configuration
               38

-------
  100
           DELAYED  MIXING
  10
 I
O
z:
CO
  .01
  .001
                lilt
       80   100
      120   140   160
       IMEP-psi
180   200
 Figure 10
Indicated Specific Nitric Oxide
for Delayed Mixing Stratified
Charge Engine Configuration
                   39

-------
the product mixture equivalence ratio for delayed and in-



stantaneous mixing at two different exhaust equivalence



ratios (is also called overall equivalence ratio) with



no EGR.  The resulting computed indicated specific nitric



oxide for instantaneous mixing  is  shown in Figure 9 while



ISNO  for delayed mixing  is  shown in Figure 10,



     The trends shown in Figure 9 for instantaneous mixing



are obviously different from those for delayed mixing



shown in Figure 10.  These differences can readily be ex-



plained by recalling that, in general,the maximum nitric



oxide is formed when the  equivalence ratio is around F =



.8.  Thus,if the equivalence ratio of the product mixture



is required to pass through equivalence ratios near F =  .8,



the nitric oxide levels will be high.  If the F  =  .8 region



can be avoided  at least  until  expansion has cooled the



products, the nitric oxide levels will be low.   For ex-



ample (as can be seen in  the lower part of Figure  8), with



an exhaust equivalence ratio of 0.6, the product mixture



 [A2 +  ZAp  ] for instantaneous mixing never passes  through



a fuel-air ratio having rapid NO  formation rates, i.e.,
                                A.


it never exceeds F = 0.6.  By  contrast, for delayed mixing



with an exhaust equivalence ratio of 0.6, the product mix-



ture [P, +  £AA9] passes through the  fuel-air ratio having
       -L      <—


rapid NO  formation, i.e., F = 0.8 region prior to reach-
        Jt


ing its final  exhaust  value of F  =  .6.  Consequently,  as




                            40

-------
shown in Figure 10, exhaust NO  concentrations with delayed
                              X.


mixing increase  with leaner exhaust mixtures rather than



decreasing as in the case of instantaneous mixing, the



exact trend depending upon the amount of EGR.  This effect



is further accentuated by the rich fuel-air mixture "being



diluted with the recirculated exhaust gases having a lean



equivalence ratio  corresponding to the exhaust equivalence



ratio.  The resulting products have an equivalence ratio



that is closer to  stoichiometric than the rich air-fuel



mixture.  It should be clear, however, that regardless of



how rich the fuel-air mixture is made  [P-. + ZAA, ] must



pass through the rapid NO  formation region,  if  the ex-
                         X


haust is to have lean products composition.



     In order to obtain  a direct comparison between in-



stantaneous mixing and delayed mixing,the data presented



in Figures 9 and 10 are  replotted by equivalence ratio



and EGR as shown in Figures  11 and 12,respectively.  Also



included in Figures 11 and 12 is a homogeneous  combustion



case which corresponds to the same time  of  combustion and



has a heat release characteristic  identical  to  that of



instantaneous mixing.



     Looking first at Figure 11  for  the  exhaust  equivalence



ratio of F = 1.0, delayed mixing  has  the  lowest  ISNO and, by



a slight amount, the greatest IMEP.   The  slightly greater



IMEP  is due to  the earlier heat  release  of  delayed mixing.
                            41

-------
 100
     -Exhaust Equivalence Ratio
                         /EGR=.I
                         d
                               EGR=.2
                                       ,'EGRcf.l;
                        Homogeneous
                        Delayed Mixing
/         - •»—
               	instantaneous Mixing
    100   130   140   140   160   160   180   200
                   IMEP-psi
Figure 11
   A Comparison Between Delayed Mixing,
   Instantaneous Mixing and Homogeneous
   Combustion by Constant Equivalence
   Ratio
                    42

-------
  10 Or
                                     EGR = .2 _
  .01
  .001
       	Homogeneous
     	Delayed Mixing
       	Instantaneous  Mixing /
                  ;
    .6     .8    1.0 V.S     .8    1.0 \6    .8
         Equivalence  Ratio ( F or  FE)
                                  i.o
Figure 12
A Comparison Between Delayed Mixing,
Instantaneous Mixing and Homogeneous
Combustion by Constant EGR
                    43

-------
The fact that the IMEP is slightly greater for the instanta-
neous mixing than for the homogeneous case is due to lower
temperatures of the product mixture for instantaneous mix-
ing and therefore less dissociation although the heat re-
lease curves are identical.  At an exhaust equivalence ratio
of F = 0.8, the delayed mixing and instantaneous mixing pre-
dict about the same results since they are both required to
finally arrive at the high nitric oxide formation region.
From an N0x standpoint,instantaneous mixing is "by far the
most desirable at an exhaust equivalence ratio of F = 0.6,
and  even homogeneous combustion is better than the de-
layed mixing,since it is not required to pass through the
region of F = 0.8.  In summary, at stoichiometric mixtures,
delayed mixing gives lower NO  for about the same IMEP than
                             Jt
instantaneous mixing.  However, as the exhaust mixture is
made leaner the situation reverses until, for an exhaust
equivalence ratio of F = 0.6, the instantaneous mixing
gives N0x several orders of magnitude lower than delayed
mixing.  This effect is shown more dramatically in Figure
12 where the difference in trends with equivalence ratio
is clearly illustrated.  It can also be seen in Figure 12
that all three curves have different shapes at different
values of EGR.  For example, with zero EGR the delayed
mixing curve is nearly horizontal while with 0.2 EGR it
has a large negative slope.  Note that the shape of the
homogeneous curve is also changed significantly.

                            44

-------
     A comparison of the efficiencies of delayed mixing,



instantaneous mixing,and homogeneous combustion is given



in Figure 13.  The instantaneous mixing and homogeneous



combustion cases show about the same variation because



they both have identical heat release functions, but



the efficiency is slightly higher for the instantaneous



mixing because of lower specific heats and less dissocia-



tion.  The delayed mixing is somewhat more efficient be-



cause more of its heat release comes earlier in the expan-



sion.



     Figures 1^4- and 15 can be viewed as the potential en-



gine combustion configurations for an arbitrarily speci-



fied maximum permissible value of ISNO.  The logical



choices would be those configurations having the highest



IMEP and efficiency, i.e., the ones nearest the upper



right hand corner.  Associated with each point  is a group



of symbols which specify delayed mixing  (D), instantaneous



mixing (I), or homogeneous combustion  (H) engine configura-



tions.  The equivalence ratio  (F) for homogeneous combus-



tion or the average  overall exhaust equivalence ratio



(Fg) for stratified  charge engine configurations is in-



cluded.  Finally the amount of recirculated exhaust gas



(EGR) for homogeneous  combustion or the  average overall



amount of recirculated exhaust gas  (EG-RQ) for stratified



charge engines is also shown.




                          45

-------
   50
LU
LJ
   40
   30
   20
                           F=I.O
           EGR = 2
      Homogeneous
      Delayed Mixing
      Instantaneous Mixing
        80   100
           140   160
       IMEP-psi
180   200
  Figure 13
A Comparison of the Indicated Enthalpy
Efficiency of Delayed Mixing, Instanta-
neous Mixing and Homogeneous Combustion
                      46

-------
LU
   30
               ISNO=!.Og/lhp-hr
      n F = 6    'ihE=-'
 _,   EGR0=.!8*EGRo=0\   D,FE=.8
*+Dr~                  x   	
            H,F=.G
            EGR=0  A    •  -     * r^r-  ~
                    4    EGR^=I3 • D,FE=I.O
             H,F=.8/        °'     EGR0=.r
             EGR=.I8

35
                         EGR=.09H  H,F = I.3
                                   EGR=0
                   -i	1	1	I	i   I
       80    100   120   140   160   180   200
                   IMEP-psi
               ISNO =0.lg/!hp-hr
   45
   40
 .^o
 i
UJ
        EGR--.I2     EGR0=.03  •D.F^I.O

     I -Instantaneous  Mixing     EGRo=-l 9.
     D-Delayed  Mixing
     H-Homogeneous       _u_  ,.
                           H H,r =1.2
                             EGR=.I7
30
                                     EGR=.05
   25
       80   100   120   140    160   180  200
                    IMEP-psi

Figure Ik   The  Engine  Combustion Configuration
           Meeting an  Indicated Specific  Nitric
           Oxide Level of 1.0 and 0.1 g/l hp-hr
                   47

-------
              ISNO=5X>.g/lhp-hr
      I,FE=.8
      EGRa-03
       80   100   120   140   160   180   200
                   IMEP-psi
  50
  45
             ISNO = 2.0g/lhp-hr
UJ
   35
   30
  T	\	1	1	1   \   I   |  I
    D,FE=.6  UV.73
    EGR0=.li 9 EGR(!0\   D,FE=.8
H,F=.8    EGR = 0 ^
EGR=.I5
  I,FF=.8
                                     EGR0=-06
                             H,F=I.2
                             EGR=.03
       80   100   120   140    160   180  200
                    IMEP-psi
Figure 15
    The Engine Combustion Configuration
    Meeting an indicated Specific Nitric
    Oxide Level of 5-0 and 2.0 g/Ihp-hr
                   48

-------
     At the very low value of ISNO = 0.1, only a few of the
combustion configurations can be used, as seen in the lower
part of Figure 1^-.  The delayed mixing looks attractive be-
cause of its reasonably high IMEP and efficiency.  Both
lean homogeneous combustion and lean instantaneous mixing
have slightly greater efficiencies but substantially lower
IMEP's.  In contrast, the rich homogeneous combustion for
the H, F = 1.JJ-, EGR = j05 combustion configuration has a
slightly larger IMEP but a considerably lower efficiency.
These results emphasize the basic limitation of the homo-
geneous charge engine with regards to the formation of
nitric oxide. When operated rich,the efficiency is low and
when operated lean, the IMEP is low.
     As the limit of ISNO is raised to 1.0, 2.0 and 5.0 as
shown in the top of Figure 1^- and in Figure 15 the choice
of configurations increases.  The stoichiometric delayed
mixing stratified charge engine configuration still
appears to offer the best compromise of efficiency and
IMEP in comparison with homogeneous combustion configura-
tion.  At these levels the very lean delayed mixing case
(D, FE =  .6) appears to be a poor choice because of
its very low IMEP.  Note that points representing an
equivalence ratio of 0.8 cluster in the center of the
figures.  For this 0.8 value, delayed mixing is slightly
better than  instantaneous mixing which  in turn is slightly
better than  homogeneous  combustion.
                            49

-------
     Homogeneous combustion and instantaneous mixing cases
with an overall stoichiometric mixture become permissible
at ISNO =2.0 and 5-0.  Their efficiency is about the same
as the delayed mixing stoichiometric case but their IMEP
is less.
     All of the above comparisons were made at conditions
analogous to wide open throttle.  Comparisons at lighter
loads depend upon the type of load control used, i.e.,
throttling versus overall fuel-air equivalence ratio con-
trol.  Note that as the overall equivalence ratio is
changed, the ratio of the volume of the fuel-air mixture
to the volume of air must change.  When the equivalence
ratio is reduced for the instantaneous mixing case the
ISNO is reduced along with the IMEP as shown in Figure 9.
If the  instantaneous mixing stratified charge engine were
to be controlled by changing the  overall equivalence ratio,
it would have the advantage of reduced emissions at re-
duced powers.  In contrast, the delayed mixing stratified
charge  engine controlled by changing equivalence ratio
would have  small changes in ISNO  with no exhaust gas re-
circulation (See Figure 10).  However when EGR =  .2 the
ISNO would  increase as power  (equivalence  ratio) decreased.
At low  ISNO levels the delayed mixing engine configuration
would have  to operate near  stoichiometric  with  consider-
able EGR.   Consequently, throttling would be  the  only
                            50

-------
feasible method of controlling engine power under these



conditions.



     In summary, the delayed mixing stratified charge en-



gine configuration operated with an overall mixture near



stoichiometric is the "best compromise of efficiency and



IMEP at moderate to low levels of ISNO.  However, the



method of load control may depend upon the level of ISNO



permitted.





E.   CONCLUSIONS



1.   The conventional homogeneous charge engine, "by operating



either very fuel-rich or very fuel-lean, can limit the



nitric oxide emissions.



2.   Exhaust gas recirculation is an effective way of re-



ducing the nitric oxide emissions from either a homogen-



eous or stratified charge engine.



3.   In the delayed mixing stratified charge concept (rich



combustion followed by the addition of air to the rich



products), extending the period during which the air is



mixed into the rich products greatly reduces the nitric



oxide level and also reduces the power.



^.   For the delayed mixing stratified charge concept, the



nitric oxide levels are low when the exhaust gas recir-



culation is high and the exhaust equivalence ratio is



near stoichiometric.
                            51

-------
5.  For the instantaneous mixing stratified charge concept



(products °f rich combustion as they are formed are in-



stantaneously mixed with the air and product mixture), the



nitric oxide levels are low when the exhaust gas recircu-



lation is high and the exhaust equivalence ratio is fuel-



lean .



6.  If an arbitrary level of nitric oxide were specified,



the various engine configurations would compare as follows





  Configuration     Exhaust Eq. Ratio   Efficiency   IMEP



Homogeneous Charge         Rich             Low      High



Homogeneous Charge        . Lean            High      Low



Instantaneous Mixing       Lean            High      Low



Delayed Mixing             Stoich.         High      High




7.  The delayed mixing stratified charge engine concept



has considerable promise because of its reasonably high



efficiency and IMEP associated with low nitric oxide



levels.
                           52

-------
                      CHAPTER III

    A DISCUSSION OF NITROGEN OXIDE EMISSIONS FROM
    VARIOUS TYPES OF INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES

A.  INTRODUCTION
     Various types of internal combustion engines will tie
discussed and compared on the "basis  of their nitrogen
oxide emissions versus overall fuel-air ratio.  It will
be shown that, in general* engines  can "be divided into two
groups with markedly different responses of nitrogen oxide
emissions with  changes in the overall  fuel-air ratio.
     The first  group is  characterized  by producing the
most nitrogen oxide  emissions  (either  ppm  or  g/hp-hr) near
stoichiometric  fuel-air  ratios  or slightly fuel lean.
This group  consists  of homogeneous charge  engines, rapid
mixing  stratified  charge engines, three-valve stratified
charge  engines  and open  chamber diesels.   In the  first
group the  fuel  is  distributed  throughout the  air  before
combustion  or the  products  of  rich combustion are rapid-
ly mixed with the  lean  ratios.
     The  second group  is characterized by producing  the
most nitrogen oxide emissions  (either ppm or g/hp-hr)  at
leaner  fuel-air ratios  and being less sensitive to changes
 in the  fuel-air ratio.   This group consists of the limited
mixing stratified charge engine and the divided chamber
                            53

-------
diesels.  In the second group of engines mixing is tempo-
rarily limited between the rich products- of combustion and
the lean region.
     The two different groups can be explained on the
basis of the fundamental concepts of nitric oxide chemical
kinetics.  Nitrogen oxides are formed in the products of com-
bustion because these are formed at a sufficiently high temper-
ature and have oxygen available.  The nitric oxide chemical
kinetics  are  slowed down by  cooling associated
with the expansion process of an engine.  Thus nitric
oxide active chemical kinetic period starts with combustion
and ends during expansion.  The availability of oxygen is
primarily a function of the local fuel-air ratio (or
equivalence ratio).  The temperature of a local region of
products is a function of the flame temperature, the amount
of compression or expansion,  the heat transfer, mixing with
other regions, and chemical reaction due to the mixing of
regions with different chemical composition.  The fuel-
air ratio is important to the temperature of the products
because it influences the flame temperature and the chemi-
cal reaction resulting from mixing.  It is not surprising
that the fuel-air ratio is a significant parameter since
it affects both the available oxygen and the product temp-
erature .  The pressure also affects the nitric oxide forma-
tion rate .to a small extent and since the pressure effect
is small it will not be included in the discussion.

                           54

-------
     The final concentration of nitric oxide is primarily



a result of the temperature and equivalence ratio history



of the products of combustion.





B.  COMBUSTION CONCEPTS OF STRATIFIED CHARGE ENGINES



     In many stratified charge engines a fuel injection



system is used to form a rich combustion region.  The lean



region is initially composed of residual product from the



previous cycle plus the fresh charge of air or air with



EGR.  The difference between the various types of these



stratified charge engines is in the processes used to com-



plete the combustion when the rich products are mixed with



the lean region.  Conceptually these engines can be divided



into two categories, those which rapidly mix the rich pro-



duct of combustion with the lean region and those which



limit the mixing  of the rich products with the lean region.



     The difference between simplified examples of the



rapid mixing and  limited mixing stratified charge engines



is  illustrated  in Figure 16.  The generalized  combustion



schematics shown  in Figure 16 assume that  the  combustion



chamber can be  divided into a few regions  of uniform



properties.  The  percentage of the mass in the various



regions is shown  as a function of the percentage of the



time of heat release.



     Figure l6a represents rapid mixing of  the  products of



rich combustion (P-, ) .  As  soon as a  small  element is




                           55

-------
       100
      co
      cd
      o
     CO
     co
              Rich Region
                  Rl
                  Lean Region
                                                  1(
)0
                 Time of Heat Release - percent

Figure l6a. Simplified Rapid Mixing Combustion Process
            (Instantaneous Mixing. Chapter  II)(R|P-A)
       100
      i
      4)
      a?
      cd
      £
      o
      «0
      to
                  Time  of  Heat  Release - percent
                                                   100
Figure  l6b.  Simplified  Limited Mixing Combustion Process
             (Delayed  Mixing,  Chapter II)(L;A-P)
        100
      rt
      o
      CO
      to
      I
                 Time of Heat Release - percent
 Figure l6c,  Simplified Limited Mixing Combustion Process
             (LiP-A)

    Figure 16   Simplified Combustion Process Schematics
                         56

-------
burnt it is thoroughly mixed throughout the lean product
mixture to give at any instant Ap + SAP, .  Initially the
product mixture consists of residual products plus air
or air with EGR (Ap) .  This process is symbolized "by
R;P-A for the rapid mixing of the rich products into the
lean product mixture (or lean region).  The combustion
processes shown in Figure l6a are similar to the theoret-
 ical  instantaneous mixing concept discussed in Chapter II
and represent a simplification of the rapid mixing group
of stratified charge engines.
     The combustion schematics presented in Figure l6b
and Figure l6c represent two simplified versions of the
limited mixing stratified charge engine group.  Both ver-
sions start with a period of rich combustion with no mix-
ing.  If the lean region (A2) is mixed  into the rich pro-
ducts (P., + £AAp) the process is symbolized by L',A-P.
This combustion process is similar to the delayed mixing
concept discussed in Chapter II.  The delayed mixing
concept represents one simplified version of the limited
mixing stratified charge engine group.  If the rich pro-
ducts (P,) are mixed into the lean region  (A2 + ZAP..) the
process is symbolized by L;P-A.  This version of the
limited mixing stratified charge engines was not dis-
cussed in Chapter II and cannot be simulated by the com-
puter program.
                           57

-------
     The combustion schematics are presented as an aid to



describing the more complicated combustion of real engines-



The Texaco Controlled-Combustion System (TCCS) Engine is



an operational version of a rapid mixing stratified charge



(R;P-A) engine as are some open chamber diesels.  The Ford



Programmed Combustion (PROCO) Engine, the Newhall Engine



and some divided chamber diesels are operational examples



of limited mixing stratified charge engines (L;P-A).



     It should be pointed out that the three-valve strati-



fied charge engine  which normally uses carburetion to



distribute the fuel throughout the charge does not fit



into the categories of rapid mixing or limited mixing



stratified charge engines.  Instead it is similar to a



homogeneous engine with the small prechamber  functioning



as a method of charge ignition.





C.  DEFINITIONS OF SOME TYPES OF INTERNAL COMBUSTION



    ENGINES



     Listed below are definitions of some of  the various



types of internal combustion engines as used  in this



paper.



     Internal Combustion Enginet  An internal combustion



engine is an engine in which the products of  combustion



are used directly as the working fluid, Obert (1968).



     Homogeneous Charge Engine;  A homogeneous  charge en-



gine is an internal combustion  engine in which  the  design





                            58

-------
is intended to distribute all of the constitutents of the
charge uniformly throughout the combustion chamber.
     Stratified Charge Engine;  A stratified charge en-
gine is an internal combustion engine in which the design
is intended to distribute the constituents of the charge
nonuniformly throughout the combustion chamber.  For ex-
ample, the fuel can be arranged into fuel-lean and fuel-
rich regions; the fuel-lean region can be air.
     Diesel Engine;  A diesel engine  is a stratified
charge engine which uses the high temperature of the com-
pressed air to ignite the  injected fuel.
     Open Chamber Engine:  An open chamber engine  is an
internal combustion engine which has  a single combustion
chamber.
     Divided  Chamber Engine;  A divided chamber engine  is
an internal  combustion engine  in which the clearance
volume is divided  into two (or more)  connected chambers.
The  chamber  in which  combustion  is  initiated is called
the  precombustion  chamber  or prechamber;  the other chamber
in which expansion occurs  is called  the main chamber.
      Three-Valve Stratified Charge Engine;   A  three-
valve  stratified charge  engine  is  a divided  chamber spark
ignition stratified charge engine  which uses a third  valve
to admit a  fuel-rich mixture near  the spark  plug  in the
small prechamber and uses  the normal inlet valve  to admit
 a fuel-lean mixture into the larger main chamber.
                            59

-------
     Rapid Mixing Stratified Charge Engine Group:   The
rapid mixing stratified charge engines are a group of
stratified charge engines in which all of the fuel passes
through the rich region and the products formed during
the combustion initiated in the rich region are rapidly
mixed with the lean region.
     Instantaneous Mixing Stratified Charge Engine (R;P-A)
An instantaneous mixing stratified charge engine is a
theoretical version of the rapid mixing stratified charge
engine group, in which the products formed during rich-
region combustion are instantaneously mixed throughout
the lean region.
     Limited Mixing Stratified Charge Engine Group;  The
limited mixing stratified charge engines are a group of
stratified charge engines in which combustion is started
in the fuel-rich region, then by some means the mixing
is temporarily limited between the rich products and the
lean region.  The lean region can be mixed into the rich
products, the rich products can be mixed  into the lean
region or the rich products and the lean  region can be
mixed into each  other.
     Delayed Mixing Stratified Charge Engine  (L-.A-P) ;  A
delayed mixing stratified  charge engine is a  theoretical
version of a limited  mixing stratified  charge engine
group. Combustion is  initiated and  completed  in the  rich
                           60

-------
region and then the lean region is mixed into the rich pro-



ducts .





D.  HOMOGENEOUS ENGINES



     Most automobiles and many light and medium duty trucks



are powered by homogeneous charge spark ignition engines



which have open combustion chambers.  Considerable re-



search has centered on reducing NO  emissions from these
                                  Jt


engines.  Although many  factors influence N0x emissions



fuel-air ratio is the most significant.  Huls (1966) mea-



sured the emission from  a homogeneous charge engine.  A



typical curve from his thesis  is  reproduced  in Figure 17



and  shows the variation  of emissions with air-fuel ratio.



The  maximum NO  emissions occur at  a slightly lean fuel-
              X.


air  mixture.  At  these conditions the two  important



factors  in nitric oxide  formation,  high temperature  and



availability  of  oxygen,  are  in optimum  proportions to



produce maximum  NO   emissions. When richer fuel-air
                   A.


mixtures  are  used the  lack  of oxygen limits nitric oxide



formation.  When leaner  fuel-air mixtures  are  used the



lower temperatures limit nitric oxide  formation.



      The  NO   emissions of homogeneous  engines  can be re-
            jC


duced by operating either very rich or very lean.  Rich



operation results in higher levels of hydrocarbons and



carbon monoxide  plus lower efficiencies.  For these  rea-



sons very rich operation is not desirable.   A  lean burning




                            61

-------
   16
   12
B  10

-------
homogeneous engine has the advantage of lower hydrocarbons,



lower carbon monoxide and higher efficiency but has the



disadvantage of lower specific power, lower flame speed



and difficulty with  ignition.  When attempts are made to



operate even leaner  a point  is reached called the lean



limit where the engine will  start to misfire.



     Recent developments in  spark timing control and car-



buretion described by John (1975) and by Adams (19?6)



have allowed homogeneous engines to operate at lower fuel-



air ratios.  The  "lean-burning engines" have lower ni-



trogen oxide emissions, lower carbon monoxide emissions,



lower hydrocarbon emissions  (except at very lean opera-



tion) and  higher  efficiency  due to more complete combus-



tion.  The disadvantage  is their lower specific power.





E.  THREE-VALVE STRATIFIED CHARGE ENGINES



     The three-valve stratified charge engine  is the most



investigated form of the divided chamber spark ignition



stratified charge engine.  It has a long history with



the initial patent being issued to H. R. Ricardo in 1918.



A  thorough presentation  of evolvement, analysis and pro-



gression of three-valve  stratified charge  engines is pre-



sented by  Turkish (19?4).



     A fuel-rich  charge  is drawn into a small prechamber



through the third valve and  a lean charge  is drawn into



the main combustion  chamber  through the normal inlet valve.




                             63

-------
Combustion is initiated by the spark plug located in the
prechamber.  As pressure builds up in the prechamber it
forces high temperature rich products of combustion out
through an orifice into the main combustion chamber.  The
hot products initiate combustion of the lean mixture in
the main chamber.  Nitrogen oxide produced in the pre-
chamber is low because of its rich charge and its small
percentage of the total charge.  The low temperature
associated with lean combustion of the main chamber charge
limits the main chambers nitrogen oxide contribution.
     The three-valve engine could be regarded as a ver-
sion of a homogeneous engine  since most of the  charge  is
in the main chamber and the charge in the main  chamber
is roughly homogeneous.
     The Honda CVCC engine, a three-valve stratified
charge engine, clearly demonstrated the potential for
the low NO  emissions by meeting the original 1975 United
          •A.
States and 1975 Japanese emissions standards ,   Tasuku
Date et al.  (19?^).  Honda's  approach has been  to opti-
mize experimentally and analytically the prechamber
volume, the  orifice size and  the  fuel distribution  as  is
described  by  Yasuo Shiauo  et  al.  (197^)-
     The essential aspect  of  performance  of all three-
valve  stratified charge  engines,  that accounts  for  the
 low NO  emissions, is the  ability to operate at very
       A.
                            64

-------
lean overall fuel-air mixtures in the main chamber.   When



a three-valve engine is compared to a similar convention-



al homogeneous engine as was done by Tasuku Date et  al.



(197*0 of Honda, by Davis et al. (197*0 of General Motors,



by Purins (197*0 of Ford and by Yasuo Sakai  (1974)  of



Nissan the results are essentially the same.  Davis  states,



"At lean overall mixtures, both the Jet Ignition Strati-



fied Charge Engine and the conventional spark ignition



engines have similar HC, CO, and NO  emission character-
                                   J\.


istics when overall air-fuel ratio is changed."  Tasuku



Date, Yasuo Sakai and Purins presented curves which showed



a direct comparison between their type of three-valve en-



gines and a similar homogeneous engine.  These results of



Tusuku Date and Yasuo Sakai are reproduced in Figures 18



and 19-  The lowest nitrogen oxide emissions correspond



to leanest operation not normally obtainable by conven-



tional homogeneous engines.



     From Figures 18 and 19 it  is apparent that the peak



nitrogen oxide emissions occur  at approximately the same



overall air-fuel ratio for both the homogeneous and three-



valve engines.  The nitrogen oxide peaks coincide because



most of the charge is in the main chamber and is somewhat



homogeneous.  The small amount  of charge in the prechamber



mixes rapidly with the main chamber charge and represents



a convenient method of ignition .





                           65

-------
                            IDLING
••*•.
                      70 r-
                              ( ISFC « 410  g/PS,-h )
                SO mll»/h
                  (ISFC«220
                          13   U   IS   16   17   18
                            AIR-FUEL RATIO ( A/F)
             13   U  IS   16  17  18   19   20   21
                       AIR -FUEL RATIO (A/F)
                       Figure 18
Comparison  of Exhaust  Emission of GVCC
Engine with Conventional Engine
From Tasuku Date  et al.  (197^)

-------
e
  3 0
  20
O 10




\\
\\
y \
\^^

1200 rpm ^30%
I.S.F. C. = 250 s/jPSh




____-_^ 	 •**

 L
 I
6
s
3
2
1
-
V
\
\
-
-
1
\\


X
- — -

JT


 o
 2
i
:
1
-

/
_L 	
A
f
/
/
i
	 TORCH IGNITED ENGINE
	 CONVENTIONAL ENGINE
\
\
\
v
Xs^-

•w
1 i
     13   u  15   16   17   18  19  20

      OVERALL AIR-FUEL RATIO
Figure  19
Comparisons  of Exhaust
Emissions  at Constant
Indicated  Specific Fuel
Consumption
From Yasuo Sakai (1971*)
                 67

-------
F.  RAPID MIXING STRATIFIED CHARGE ENGINES
    1.  Instantaneous Mixing Stratified Charge Engine
        Concept
     The instantaneous mixing stratified charge engine con-
cept described in Chapter II is a simplified theoretical
version of the rapid mixing stratified charge engine group.
It has the most nitric oxide emissions near stoichiometric
fuel-air ratios as seen in Figure 12.  The shape of the
nitric oxide curve is similar to the homogeneous curve.
The combustion process is similar to that described in
Figure l6a, R;P-A.
     The lean region is initially air or air with EGR (A2)
and it is at compression temperature.  As combustion occurs
the rich products which are formed are instantaneously
mixed throughout the product region.  The result of com-
bustion is that the product mixture fuel-ratio and tem-
perature increase toward those of the corresponding homo-
geneous case.  The nitric oxide formed by the instantaneous
mixing case will, as usual, depend on the time available, the
product mixture temperature history and the product mix-
ture fuel-air ratio history.
     When the final mixture  is stoichiometric the in-
stantaneous mixing engine has nearly the same nitric oxide
emissions as the homogeneous engine.  Under these condi-
tions some of the temperature history  is sufficiently
                           68

-------
high to increase the nitric oxide formation rate and to



allow the instantaneous mixing engine to form about the



same amount of nitric oxide as the homogeneous engine.



This process  is assisted by the fact that the equivalence



ratio of the product mixture passes through the rapid



nitric oxide forming region, which is slightly fuel-lean.



     For the other conditions shown in Figure 12 the in-



stantaneous mixing engine produces less nitric oxide than



the homogeneous engine.  Under these conditions the tem-



perature and the equivalence ratio of the  instantaneous



engine is always less than  that  of the homogeneous engine



as  is the resulting nitric  oxide formation rate.  The



lower temperatures and  leaner product mixture does not



allow the instantaneous engine's  nitric oxide  concentra-



tion to  reach  the  level of  the homogeneous engine before



the cooling associated  with expansion stops the nitric



oxide kinetics.





     2.  Texaco Controlled-Combustion System  (TCCS)



     Texaco Inc.  has  developed an open  combustion  chamber



stratified  charge  engine which  uses  the  Texaco  Controlled-



Combustion  System (TCCS).   In this engine air is caused



to  swirl in the combustion chamber.   Fuel is  injected in-



to  the  swirling air and immediately ignited.  A flame



front  is established that burns  the  fuel as  fast as it



is  injected.   The  rich  products  of combustion are  rapidly





                            69

-------
cooled "by the excess air.  The NO  emissions as reported by
                                 X
Mitchell et al. (1972) are presented in Figure 20.  His
curves show the variation of NO  emissions with changes
                               X
in the engine IMEP.  Although fuel-air ratios are not
plotted directly the lower IMEP corresponds to leaner
overall fuel-air ratios.  Mitchell states, "Fuel combus-
tion under rich mixture conditions limits formation of
oxides of nitrogen in the flame zone.  A quick quench of
the burned gases by the cold excess air precludes further
NO  formation in these post-flame gases."  This descrip-
  Jl.
tion along with the generally increasing nitrogen oxide
concentration with IMEP implies that the TCCS engine
could be considered a rapid mixing stratified charge en-
gine.  The rapid mixing stratified charge engine would be
expected to  have increasing nitric oxide emissions with
increasing IMEP as does  its theoretical counterpart the
instantaneous mixing  engine.  See Figure 9 for the cal-
culated results of the  instantaneous engine.

G.  LIMITED  MIXING STRATIFIED CHARGE ENGINES
    1.  Delayed Mixing  Stratified Charge Engine  Concept
      The delayed mixing concept  of  stratified charge en-
gines is a theoretical  version  of the  limited mixing
stratified charge  engine group which corresponds to the
combustion process described  in Figure l6b,  L;A-P.

                           70

-------
*,
o oc
Zi! 5
rife
, MM
O
0
i
30
K
^ 20
M
O
r10
o
* ft


1
p



^£

0
*— ~"
••»— '
^i •••
_^
•»<»*t«^
— BASE ENGINE
	 WITH MODIFICATIONS
	 WITH MODIFICATIONS
a CATALYST
y
w.

h^^MM^W

-—-

•—— ,


BEGF
, EGR

•'
                     IMEP-PSI
                                  120
Figure 20
Single Cylinder Evaluations
HC plus NO  Emissions
From Mitchell et al.  (1972)
                  71

-------
All of the fuel is in the rich region which "burns first.
During the rich combustion little nitric oxide is formed
because of the lack of oxygen even though the temperature
of the rich products is quite high.  When the rich com-
bustion is finished, the lean region (air plus EGR) is
added incrementally to the rich products.  The incremen-
tal addition of the air continues the combustion process
and keeps the product mixture temperature high.  If the
overall air-fuel ratio is lean the excess air will cause
a reduction in the temperature of the product mixture.
     The amount of nitrogen oxide which is formed with  an
overall stoichiometric mixture is less  for the delayed
mixing engine than the corresponding homogeneous engine
burning a stoichiometric mixture as shown in Figure 12.
The difference is primarily caused by the equivalence ratio
of the delayed mixing engine being richer than that of  the
homogeneous engine.  The product temperature  for both en-
gines would be similar.  Expansion stops the  nitric oxide
kinetics before the nitric  oxide concentration of the de-
layed mixing  engine reached that of the homogeneous engine.
     When the  overall mixture  of a delayed mixing engine
is very lean  the nitric  oxide  emissions from the  de-
layed mixing  engines are much  larger  than  the instantaneous
engine  using  a correspondingly lean mixture.   The delayed
mixing product mixture  starts  at a high temperature  and

                            72

-------
is provided with abundance of oxygen which results in the
high nitric oxide concentration.  The expansion cools the
product mixture and stops the nitric oxide kinetics before
the reverse reactions can reduce the concentration.  In
contrast the homogeneous mixture is always at a low tem-
perature which limits the nitric oxide formation.
     If the delay period were to "be extended to the end of
the active nitric oxide kinetic period the nitric oxide
emissions would correspond to that of a homogeneous en-
gine operating at the rich equivalence ratio.  In general,
the delay period is not that long and some nitric oxide
is formed due to mixing of the  lean region with the rich
products.

     2.  Ford Programmed  Combustion  (PROCO) Engine
     Ford Motor Company has  developed a type  of open
chamber stratified  charge engine which  is called  the
Ford Programmed Combustion  (PROCO) Engine.  Stratifica-
tion is established by  causing  the air  in the combustion
chamber to  have a  high  swirl and  to  spray the fuel into
the  central region of the swirl.  A  spark plug located
near the  fuel  spray cone  ignites  the  rich region.   Lavoie
and Blumberg (1973) of  Ford compared  the  nitric oxide
emissions  from the PROCO  engine to  that of a  similar
homogeneous engine. Their results are shown in Figure
 21.   They found that near overall stoichiometric fuel-air

                            73

-------
       I04 -
       I05


      NO
     PPM


       10 2
—    6 1500 RPM. 70 IMEP
                         Theory
                  i—	Experiment
       10 I	I
            0.6    0.7   0.8   0.9   I 0
Figure 21
    Comparison of Preraixed and
    Stratified NO Concentrations
    As a Function of Equivalence
    Ratio at  Q% EGR.  From Lavoie
    and Blumberg (1973)
                     74

-------
mixtures,the PROCO engine had less nitric oxide emissions



"but that for very lean mixtures, the PROCO engine had



greater nitric oxide emissions than the homogeneous en-



gine.  Blumberg (1973) of Ford has been able to predict



the same trends in nitric oxide emissions by use of a



computer model of the PROCO engine.  The theoretical re-



sults are also shown in Figure 21.  One essential feature



of the model is that the stratification of the charge



remains throughout combustion and expansion until the



charge temperature is sufficiently low to prevent changes



in the nitric oxide concentration.  In the model the



richest element, in the center, burns first and combus-



tion progresses to the leanest  element.  When the over-



all equivalence ratio is made leaner each element like-



wise becomes leaner.  Since the first elements to burn



adds the most to the nitric oxide concentration and the



first elements are made leaner  (still rich but nearer



stoichiometric), they tend to increase the nitric oxide



concentration.  The last elements to burn which are lean



and become leaner, tend to reduce the nitric oxide con-



centration. The net result is that the nitric oxide con-



centration is nearly independent of fuel-air ratio as



seen in Figure 21.



     An  interesting comparison  can be made between the



delayed mixing engine with zero EGR shown in Figure 12




                           75

-------
and the PROCO engine also with zero EGR shown in Figure 21.

Both show very little change in nitric oxide concentra-

tion with equivalence ratio.  The swirl stratification

model and the delayed mixing model "both have a delay in

the mixing of the rich product region.  In the Ford swirl

stratification model, the delay extends until the nitric

oxide kinetics have been stopped by expansion.  In the

delayed mixing model the delay lasts only part way through

the active nitric oxide kinetic period.  In the actual

PROCO engine some mixing is likely to occur between the

various elements during the active nitric oxide kinetic .
                         •,
period and yet the measured nitric oxide concentration

is also nearly independent of equivalence ratio.  The

delay before the rich products start to mix and the limit-

ed amount of mixing  that does occur before expansion

cooling stops the nitric oxide kinetics are the main

reasons for the shape of the nitric oxide emissions curve.


     3«  Newhall Engine

     A version of the divided chamber spark ignition

stratified charge engine has been built and tested by

Newhall and El-Messiri  (1973).  The fuel is injected

into a large prechamber and only air  is brought into

the main chamber.  The nitrogen oxide emissions shown

in Figure 22 have a  maximum at about  an overall equiva-

lence ratio  of  .?.   If  the  rich products leaving  the


                           76

-------
   3000
    1000
                             o
     300
o
Tt
•H
c
d>
W)
o
     100
      30,
                  .6         .8        1.0

                   Overall Equivalence Ratio
                            1.2
      Figure 22
Nitrogen Oxide Concentration versus
Overall Equivalence Ratio for Wide
Open Throttle and 6$% Prechamber
Volume, From Ingham(1976)
                         77

-------
prechamber are rapidly mixed with the air in the main
chamber as is done in the instantaneous model the nitric
oxide maximum would occur near stoichiometric, probably
not leaner than an overall equivalence ratio of .8.  Sup-
pose all of the nitric oxide were to be formed in the
prechamber and the mixing were delayed until after the
active nitric oxide kinetic period.  If the maximum
nitric oxide occurred at a prechamber equivalence ratio
of .85, the overall equivalence ratio would be about .55
(.85 x .65 = .5525).  Apparently a limited amount of
mixing and nitric oxide formation does occur in the main
combustion chamber which accounts for the nitric oxide
maximum occurring between the instantaneous mixing con-
cept and the other extreme of all of the nitric oxide
being formed in the prechamber.
     The Newhall Engine could be included in the L;P-A
group shown in Figure l6c.  The rich products of com-
bustion probably remain in the combustion chamber for a
short period and when they emerge, they mix rapidly with
the lean mixture.

H.  COMPRESSION IGNITION STRATIFIED CHARGE ENGINE
     Although diesel engines are stratified charge engine
they are not usually grouped with spark ignition strati-
fied charge engines because of the large differences in
                           78

-------
the combustion processes.  Certainly the diesel combustion
process is considerably more complex than many spark
ignition stratified charge engines.  However, the chemi-
cal reactions and chemical kinetics of nitric oxide apply
equally as well to diesel engines as they do to spark
ignition stratified charge engines, as they do to any
form of combustion with air.  For example, Tuteja (1972)
showed that the Zeldovich mechanism could be used to cal-
culate the nitric oxide  concentration  in diffusion  flames
with reasonable accuracy.  Many diesel engine models
based  on the nitric oxide chemical reactions and chemi-
cal kinetics have satisfactorily predicted nitric oxide
emissions.  Some examples are  Gakir  (1974),  Shahed  (1973)
Nightingale  (1975)  and Khan  (1973) .
     Most  of the nitric  oxide  is formed  in the  regions  of
hot products of combustion,  some is  formed in  the  combus-
tion zone  and  none  is formed in the  cool reactants.
Nightingale  (1975)  of Ricardo  and Co.  demonstrated this
point  by  taking  samples  inside  of a diesel combustion
chamber at various  times and locations during the  combus-
tion process.  His  results,shown in Figure 23,are  for a
point  in  the center of the fuel spray.  As combustion
proceeds,the hydrocarbons drop to a low level and the
C02  increases  to a higher level.  The CO peak is due to
the  richness of the region being sampled.  After combustion
                            79

-------
       800--20
       600- •«
      C
      1
       200-'5
        0-LO
             -10   TDC   10  20   30   40   50
400--10
Figure  23
        Gaseous Composition  in  the
        Center of  the Fuel Spray As
        a Function of Crank  Angle
        From Nightingale, D.R.  (1975)
                   80

-------
is completed, the nitric oxide level continues to increase



until it peaks.  This is evidence which shows that much



of the nitric oxide is formed in the products of combustion



as would be expected from the chemical kinetics.



     Nightingale also presented results showing the nitric



oxide concentration versus equivalence ratio for all



samples taken later than 5° ATDC.  At an angle of 5° ATDC



most of the combustion should be complete.  His results



are given in Figure 24a.  In general, the results indicate



that samples of products having an equivalence ratio near



.9 will have greater nitric oxide concentrations than



either richer  or leaner samples.  A  similar curve was



obtained by Rhee (19?6) with samples in the lean region



and is presented in Figure 24b.  The magnitude of the



nitrogen oxide emissions reported by Nightingale is  m&ch



lower because  of the engine modification necessary for



photographing  the  combustion process.  The nitric oxide



maximum occurs at  about the same equivalence ratio as



the nitric oxide maximum for homogeneous combustion.



The similarity in  the results  is because both types  of



combustion produce most of the  nitric oxide in the  com-



bustion products by means  of the same  chemical reactions



and chemical kinetics, even though  the combustion pro-



cesses used to form the products are very  different.



     A study of Pischinger (19?2) compared the nitrogen



oxide emissions from open  chamber (direct  injection)




                           81

-------
Figure

Experimental  In-Cyl-
inder NO concentration
as a Function of Equiv-
alence Ratio, From
Nightingale  (1975)
                            •2   -i   -6   -8  1-0  1-2   14   1-6
                                 Weak            Rich
                                     Equivalence ratio
 Figure
 Nitrogen Oxide Con-
 centration Versus
 Equivalence Ratio
 For  Samples Taken
 From 15-20°ATDC,
 From Rhee (1976)
                        6000
ft ^000
ft
                      z
                        2000
               oo
                 0
                       c
                        0
                  Tt
                                o
                                               .8
                                   Equivalence Ratio
                                 i.o
        Figure 2*4*
Nitric Oxide Concentration Versus
Equivalence Ratio  For Samples taken
From Within  a Direct Injection
Diesel After Combustion
                         82

-------
diesels and divided chamber (indirect injection) diesels.
His results are given in Figure 25-  The open chamber
diesel has increasing nitrogen oxide levels with increas-
ing BMEP while the divided chamber diesel has a maximum
nitrogen oxide level at about the center of its operating
range.  Monaghan et al. (197^) and others have  found
similar results in comparing the open chamber and divided
chamber diesels.

      1.  Open Chamber Diesel Engines
      The open chamber  (direct  injection) diesel has a
nitrogen oxide emissions  curve that  is  similar  to the
characteristic shape of the rapid  mixing stratified
charge engine group, as shown  in Figure 25. The explana-
tion  for the  increasing nitrogen oxide  concentration with
increasing overall  fuel-air ratio  depends  on  how  the com-
bustion process  is  visualized.   Shahed  (1973)  and
Nightingale (1975)  present combustion models  in which
the combustion  is  assumed to  occur at stoichiometric
 conditions and  no  mixing occurs between the products
 formed at  various  times.   With their models the increase
 in the overall  fuel-air ratio results in more products
 at stoichiometric  conditions  and consequently more ni-
 trogen oxide.  In Khan (1973)  combustion model, air is en-
 trained in a vaporized fuel jet with fuel and air mixing
 occurring within the jet.  The rate of combustion is
                            S3

-------
      000
      600
    I
    5
      600
    OL
    CL
     x
    o
      400
      200
  RATED  SPEED
  BASIC TIMING
-DEGR, CA BTDC—
       18'CA
         0   20   40   60   80  XX)
                  BMEP  PSI
Figure  25
    NO  Concentration, Naturally
    Aspirated Direct-injection
    and Prechamber Engines
    From Pischinger, R.  (1976)
                84

-------
determined by the mixing process.  In this model, the



changes in the equivalence ratio of the products will in-



fluence the nitric oxide concentration.  Khan's model



predicts a nitric oxide peak at high overall fuel-air



ratios whereas Shahed's and Nightingale's models do not.



See Figure 26.  The existence  of a nitrogen oxide maximum



at high fuel-air ratios is shown experimentally "by Night-



ingale (1975), in Figure 26b.  The smoke  limit usually



prevents diesels from operating  at high overall fuel-air



ratios where  the nitrogen  oxide  maximum occurs.



      If Khan's model  is used  to  visualize the  combustion



processes, then  it  would be possible  to include the  open



chamber  diesel  in  the rapid mixing  stratified  charge



engine  group.  The nitrogen  oxide  emission curve  from



the  open chamber diesel  also  indicates that it should be



 in the  rapid mixing group.





      2.   Divided Chamber Diesel Engines



      In the divided chamber diesel engines, the fuel is



 injected into the prechamber where combustion begins.



 The pressure in the prechamber increases and forces the



 product mixture out into the main chamber.  Typically



 the design of the combustion chambers promote swirl in



 the main chamber.  As is shown in Figure 25, the nitrogen



 oxide concentration has a maximum which  does not occur



 for the open chamber  diesel normal operating range.  The



 nitrogen oxide maximum can be explained  by postulating





                            85

-------
Figure 26a
Calculated  (dashed
line) and Experimental
(solid line)  Exhaust
NO versus Engine
Fueling
From Khan et  al. (1973)3
2000
1500
1000
500
%

X


s
s

X
/
1


/
/


«




*
X
\



0 AO 50 60 70
FUELING mur/Stroke
 Figure 26b
 The  Effect of Varying
 Engine Overall Air/Fuel
 Ratio (Engine Load)  on
 Exhaust NO Concentration
 From Nightingale,  D.  R.
      (1975)
                        ' ^	Calculated results C|2 H
                           — -— Calculated results Gas oil
                                       30      tO      50
                                          Overall air/luel ratio
 Figure 26
Comparisons  Between Nitric  Oxide Emissions
from Models  and Measured  Results
                             86

-------
that the product mixture entering the main chamber has
limited mixing with the main chamber air.
     The mixture in the prechamber will always be richer
than the overall mixture because only a fraction of the
air is in the prechamber.  At high powers (BMEP) the
prechamber contains a rich fuel-air mixture.  The rich-
ness of the mixture would account for low nitrogen oxide
concentrations in the prechamber.  Other factors could
limit the nitrogen oxide formation in the main  chamber.
For example, it  is possible that the secondary  swirl
caused by the products  entering the main chamber from
the prechamber could result in  fluid rotation with the
high temperature (low  density)  products  in  the  center
and the low temperature (high density) air  on the sides.
This stratification  could account  for  some  of the delay
in the mixing process.   Possibly  the  products  mixture
enters the main  chamber too  late  in  the  nitric  oxide's
active kinetic period  to result in more nitrogen oxide.
The increase  in  heat transfer due  to the swirl  could re-
duce the  temperatures  and  consequently limit nitrogen
oxide  concentrations.
     Because  of  the  complexity of the  combustion and
mixing processes,it  is difficult to  attribute the shape
of the nitrogen oxide  curve  to any one factor.   However,
 it seems  reasonable to group the divided chamber engine
                            87

-------
with the other limited mixing stratified charge engine "be-
cause it has the same general shape of nitrogen oxide
emissions, the prechamber limits mixing,and the swirl
in the main chamber also limits mixing.
                           88

-------
                      CHAPTER IV

        THE TEST FACILITY AND INSTRUMENTATION

A.  INTRODUCTION
     In order to study the delayed mixing concept of strati-
fied charge engines, it was first necessary to decide wheth-
er the test facility should simulate a practical engine or
simply test the concept.  There are many problems associa-
ted with designing  a practical engine such as keeping the
rich charge and the air separated "before mixing, finding
an effective way of mixing the air with the rich products,
and determining the most appropriate values for the main
variables.  Because of the problems associated with the
design of a practical engine  it was decided not to attempt
the simulation of a practical delayed mixing engine.
     The alternative to designing a practical delayed
mixing engine is to experimentally simulate the combus-
tion processes and  study the  main parameters.  This is
the approach taken  here.  The test facility consists of
a single cylinder CFR engine  fitted with  an adjustable
carburetor and an adjustable  air  injection system.  The
test facility simulates delayed mixing  combustion by ad-
mitting a rich charge to the  combustion chamber, burning
the charge and injecting the  air when combustion is
essentially complete.
                            89

-------
     A schematic diagram of the test facility is presented
in Figure 27-

B.   ENGINE
     An ASTM-CFR (Fuel Research Engine, 4~1957) single cy-
linder engine with variable compression ratio was used
for the experimental program.  Three radial access ports
plus the spark plug hole were in the head assembly.  One
port directly across the cylinder from the spark plug was
used for the air injection nozzle.  The two other ports
are located at ^5° either side of the spark plug.  One of
these ports houses the pressure transducer.  Prior to
testing,the engine was disassembled, cleaned and rebuilt.
     When the compression ratio was adjusted,  the influence
of the nozzle, inlet and exhaust valve penetration, and
spark plug on the clearance volume was included in the
calculations.  The procedure  as deduced  from  the ASTM
Manual  (1971)> is to place a small block,.625 inches
 (15.9 mm) high,  in the combustion chamber positioned
between the  valves while  the  piston  is at top  dead center.
Next  the  head is cranked  down until  it stops.   A micrometer
mounted between  the variable  head assembly and the stationary
base  of the  engine is adjusted to  .362 inches  (9.19  mm).   The
compression  ratio can be  calculated  by means of the  follow-
ing  equation.
                            90

-------
                                                                T13)
batteries
                  T  ignition
                 "=~  switch
stomexer
MNrl

i/^s

coolant
condenser
coolin
*\\ system
tl

g
At
                                      cooling
                                      water
                       breaker
                       points

                          ffi
                                    induction
                                    coil
                       Capacitor amplifier
                                           carburetor/^
                                                .   .  I i *•
                                             ventun
                                                main        j
                                                needle
                                float
                                bowls
  exhaust
  mixing
               fu«l
               scale
fuel
tanks
                                                flow control
                                                                      dynamometer
                                   restriction  valve
higR press
air comp.
                    cooling water
         high pressure
         air storage tanks
ng water
                                         FACILITY  SCHEMATIG DIAGRAM
                                             Figure 2?

-------
  r^m-™~«r,.-,T,vm PO+T~ - ^.5*+ 0.3 + micrometer reading
  Compression Ratio -  0.3 + micrometer reading	

     In this equation the 0.3 inches corresponds to a phy-
sical distance of .263 (.625 - -362 = .263) and 4.5 cor-
responds to the engine stroke.  The value of .3 is used
in place of .263 to compensate for a slightly larger cy-
linder diameter in the clearance volume.  Corrections for
the volume added by the spark plug is equivalent to an
additional .004 inches, the valve penetration reduces the
volume equivalent to  .0253 inches and the air injection
nozzle increases the volume in accordance with the size
of nozzle used.  The  correction for the 5/16 inch nozzle
is equivalent to an increase of .0156 inches.  The com-
pression ratio equation for this nozzle is as follows.

 r*™™^^;™ r.o+^ -  4.5 + .294 + micrometer reading
 Compression ratio	.29^ + micrometer reading

The compression ratio equation for the  .0935 inch nozzle
is as follows.
 r-  «~«  -;™ v.o+;~ -  4.5 + .281 + micrometer reading
 Compression ratio	.281 + micrometer reading

     Connected to one end of the engine crank shaft is a
dynamometer and connected to the other  end  is a  sprocket
used to drive the cam-operated air injection valve.  The
angular location  of  the  sprocket teeth  are  sensed by a
 *A11 the numbers  on  this page  are  in  inches,  to  convert  to
  millimeter  multiply by 25.4.
                           92

-------
magnetic pick-up for use as timing marks on the oscillo-



scope display.  Another magnetic pick-up is used to indi-



cate top dead center; a third triggers the sweep of the



oscilloscope; and a fourth magnetic pick-up senses engine



speed for the emergency shut-down system.




C.  DYNAMOMETER



     A 50 horsepower  (37285 watt) General  Electric dynamo-



meter serial  number  2127382  is  used in conjunction with the



control  system.  The  dynamometer system keeps the engine



speed constant at the desired level for either motored or



powered  operation.   A 24.75  inch (6278.7 mm)  diameter scale



calibrated  in .2 Ib-  (.89N)  increments is  used to measure



a  force  which can be  converted to engine power by  the



relationship  below.



                    Force  Read  on Scale x  RPM
       Horsepower = 	^^-	




When the engine is producing  power, the scale  force  is an



indicator of  brake  horsepower based on this conversion.



When the engine  is  being motored with the  ignition turned



off the  scale force indicates the approximate frictional



horsepower.  The  sum of the powered and motored horsepower



is approximately  the indicated horsepower.



     Also connected  to the dynamometer is  the sensor for a



tachometer.  The engine RPM is displayed on one of  the con-



trol panels.





                           93

-------
D.  FUEL SYSTEM
     The fuel system is shown as part of the test facility
schematic presented in Figure 27.  Fuel is stored in out-
board engine fuel tanks.  The tanks are connected to an
automatic fuel weighing system.  In the fuel weighing sys-
tem a time is measured which corresponds to a specified
mass of fuel; in our tests twenty grams.  A fuel pump
draws the fuel from the scale and delivers it to the float
bowls.  The float bowls maintain a constant level by means
of the float bowl valve.  Two float bowls in series are
used to increase the stability of the fuel flow rate to
the engine.  Fuel leaves through the bottom of the second
float bowl, passes through the main needle valve which is
a 1/4 inch micrometer valve and enters the venturi of the
CFR carburetor where fuel mixes with the air.
     A number of calibration runs were performed on the
fuel system by extracting fuel from between the needle
valve and the carburetor.  A small valve was installed in
that line for the purpose of controlling fuel flow rate.
During the test period the fuel was collected in a beaker
while the fuel scale was activated as often as possible.
A comparison is shown below of the time interval corres-
ponding to the flow of twenty grams of fuel as obtained
from the fuel scale and calculated from the accumulated
fuel.
                           94

-------
           Time Interval -seconds
  Fuel Scale

                                            Time Interval
 Average Std. Dev.     Accumulated Fuel         Ratio

  6^.02       .53             65-18                .9822

  65.51     1.26             65.93                .9936

  66.^2       .634            66.74                .9952

  66.15       .721            66.34                .9971



     Although the scale  is  seen  to "be  quite accurate one

known source of error can be calculated  is due to the

buoyancy associated with the tubing  used to draw the fuel

from the fuel beaker located on  the  scale.  Since the

fuel level in the beaker is  lowered  during the weighing

process the buoyancy force  exerted on  the tubing and the

beaker is reduced.  The  reduction in the buoyancy appears

to the scale as removal  of  fuel.  Thus the scale would

indicate more fuel removed  for the beaker than was actual-

ly removed or the time interval  indicated by the fuel

scale for the removal of twenty  gram of  fuel is shorter

than the correct value.  For our system  the error is

equivalent of .0922 grams.   The  ratio  of the time inter-

val indicated by the fuel scale  to the time interval cor-

rected for buoyancy is .9954.  This  is approximately the

ratio of the fuel scale  time  interval  to that deduced

from the accumulated fuel.   If the fuel  scale were to be

corrected for buoyancy of the fuel removing tube the


                           95

-------
 accuracy would be greater.   However,  it is sufficiently
 accurate without the buoyancy correction.
 E.   CARBURETED AIR SYSTEM
      The air that flows  through the  carburetor,  called
 carbureted air, is drawn into a surge tank through a
 laminar flow element as  indicated  in Figure 2?.   The  surge
 tank reduces the air flow fluctuations and establishes  a
 nearly constant pressure differential across the laminar
 flow element.   An inclined  manometer is used to  measure
 the  pressure differential.   The laminar flow element  was
 calibrated by motoring the  engine  and measuring  the air
 entering the laminar flow element  with a large bellows
 meter.   The flow of air  through the  laminar flow element
 can  be  described by the  linear relationship shown below.
 Volumetric Flow Rate (CFM)* = 5.964.  x Ap(inches  of HpO)

     A  choke is located  in  the carbureted  air line to
 restrict the air flow for part load  operation.   An emer-
gency air shut off valve  is  also located in the air line
 which  closes in the event of an over  speed accident.
     The air enters the  venturi section of a CFR car-
 buretor and mixes with the  fuel.   Between  the carburetor
 and  the engine is a section of piping which is heated
 with a  strip heater.  A  mercury manometer  is used to
 measure the inlet fuel-air  mixture pressure and  various
 *See Appendix I for conversion to  SI units.
                           96

-------
temperatures are measured "by thermocouples connected to


the multipoint recorder.




F.  INJECTION AIR SYSTEM



     The high pressures associated with combustion require


that the injection air be compressed to high pressures.  A


high pressure air compressor is used to fill high pres-


sure air storage tanks as shown in Figure 27.  During


engine operation the air is drawn from the storage tanks


and passes through a pressure regulator which controls


the entrance pressure to the flow restriction.  The flow


restriction is used to measure the air flow rate.  Fol-


lowing the flow restriction is a needle valve which is


used to control the flow of air.  A surge tank near the


air injection valve damps out flow fluctuation caused by


the periodic opening of the air injection valve.  After


leaving the air injection valve the air flows through a


nozzle which controls how the air enters the combustion


chamber.  More details about the main components of the


air injection system are given in the following sections.




     1.  High Pressure Air Compressor System



     A four stage Joy Model 15-H air compressor capable


of reaching pressures of 3500 psi (24130 KP ) is used to
                                           3.


supply the high pressure air.  Five air storage tanks rated


at 2300 psi (15860 KP 1 are used to store the air.  The
                     3.
'a'



      97

-------
tanks provide sufficient capacity for normal operation of a



few hours.  Typically the air pressure is reduced to about



1200 psi before entering the engine test cell.  The pressure



regulator used is pneumatically controlled.





     2.  High Pressure Air Flow Measurement System



     A major problem associated with the air injection



system is the method of measuring the air flow rate.  At the



high pressures used, a laminar flow element would have to be



very small in diameter and very long to provide sufficient



pressure drop for accurate measurement.  There is also the



question of high pressure requirements of the pressure



differential measuring device.



     The approach used was to include in the line a sub-



stantial flow restriction.  The flow restriction consists



of a .054 inch (1.37 mm) diameter tube with three .017 inch



(0.43 mm) diameter wires in it.  Within the four foot flow



restriction the flow would be turbulent.  For fully developed



turbulent flow through a nearly constant temperature tube a



computer program was developed which correlated the flow



through the flow restriction to the inlet pressure, inlet



temperature and the outlet pressure.  Numerous calibration



runs were made under various flow conditions.  The measured



flow was compared to the computer program predicted flow



rate.  A very slight adjustment was made in a constant in



the friction factor equations in order to establish






                          98

-------
 agreement between the measured and calculated results.
 The deviation from the calculated values is usually less
 than 2 psi (13.97 KP&).   The details of the computer pro-
 gram and the calibration of the flow restrictions are
 presented in Appendix E.

      3.  Air  Injection Valve
      The air  injection valve  had  to  be  specially  designed
because  of its  special requirements  for large  flow  rates
and  short  open  periods.   The  essential  features of  the
valve are  that  it opens  and closes in *4-0 crank angle
degrees  and it  can let in a mass  of  air about  equal to
the  carbureted  charge  at wide open throttle.   A sketch of
the valve is shown in Appendix F.  Included  in  Appendix G
is a computer program  which describes the flow of air
through  the valve and  the dynamic forces resulting  from
the  cam  engaging  the cam follower.

G.   PRESSURE  TRANSDUCER  SYSTEM
     An AVL type  KQD 250C pressure transducer  is  mounted
in one of  the access ports  in the head  assembly.  This
type of pressure  transducer is water cooled and has
been found to be  quite accurate by Lancaster (1975)•
The  pressure  transducer  was prepared, as recommended by
Lancaster,  with a General Electric RTV  560  (synthetic
rubber) coating to reduce the heat transfer.   The

                           99

-------
pressure transducer signal goes to a Kistler charge ampli-
fier model 566, SlNS^-8.  The signal from the charge ampli-
fier is displayed on the oscilloscope.
H.  OSCILLOSCOPE
     A Tecktronix Type 35A- oscilloscope is used to display
the cylinder pressure signal and the timing marks.  The
timing marks indicate ten crank angle degree increments
with the top dead center pulse being greater in amplitude.
The oscilloscope has a single "beam.  In order to show
both the pressure signal and the timing marks it is neces-
sary to use a  special plug-in unit which will either al-
ternately display the two signals or simultaneously dis-
play both signals by alternately displaying small  incre-
ment of each (chopped).  The oscilloscope was checked-
out and calibrated before it was put in service.
     The engine speed can be obtained from the oscillo-
scope display  of the timing marks.  From the oscilloscope
it is possible to determine the elapsed time between top
dead center pulses.  This elapsed time can be converted
into engine RPM.  The engine speed was determined  by
this method.
I.  MULTIPOINT TEMPERATURE RECORDER
     A Leeds and Northrup multipoint  temperature  recorder
serial number  E79-52108-1-1  is used to record the  various
 temperatures.   The thermocouples  are chrome1-alurael,  Type
                            100

-------
K.  The multipoint recorder has the capability of recording



24 different temperatures.  Twelve of the temperatures can



be in the range of 20°F to 250°F  (266.3°K to 394°K) and the



other twelve can be in the range  of 200°F to 2000°F (366.3°K



to ISGe^K).  The numbers  indicated on the test facility



schematic diagram  (Figure 27)  correspond to the numbers



printed by the multipoint recorder.





 J.   EMISSIONS CART SYSTEM



      The emissions cart  system is composed of two parts



 the cart containing the  instrumentation and the cart con-



 taining the calibration  and purge gas cylinders.  The in-



 strumentation cart is set-up to measure nitrogen oxides



 (NO and NO ), carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons.  There
           J\.


 are valves on the instrumentation cart that are used to



 select a purge gas (nitrogen), room air, the appropriate



 calibration gas or a sample from the engine exhaust gases.



 The sample is run through an  ice bath and filter before



 it goes to the instrumentation.  Pumps on the instrumen-



 tation cart cause the sample  to  flow from the exhaust pipe



 and through the instrumentation.  Details of each of the



 instruments is given below.





      1.  Nitrogen Oxide  Measurement



      The nitrogen oxide  measurement is made by a  chemi-



 luminescent NO-NO  gas analyzer  model 10A manufactured
                  J\.



                            101

-------
by Thermo Electron Corporation.  The instrument has seven



ranges for 0-10 to 0-1000 PPM, its sensitivity is .1 PPM



and can measure either NO or NO .
                               Ji.


     The chemiluminescent nitrogen oxide analyzer uses the



photons generated when nitric oxide and ozone are reacted



to count the number of nitric oxide molecules.  A photo-



multiplier tube is optically filtered so that it will



only respond to the nitric oxide photons.  The rate of



flow of sample through the reaction cell is maintained



constant so that the output signal will be proportional



to nitric oxide.  When the nitrogen oxides (NO ) are to
                                              j\.


be measured the sample is passed through a thermoconverter



which converts the various oxide of nitrogen to nitric



oxide before the sample goes to the reaction chamber.





     2.  Carbon Monoxide Measurement



     The carbon monoxide is measured by a nondispersive



infrared detector (Infrared Analyzer - IRISA) manufactured



by Beckman.  The instrument consist of two parts; a unit



containing the sensing elements and a unit containing the



electronics and meter.  A nondispersive infrared detector



detects carbon monoxide by comparing the amount of in-



frared radiation absorbed by the sample and a reference



gas.  Infrared radiation is passed through a reference



cell and also through a cell containing the sample gas.



After the radiation passes through the cells it goes to





                           102

-------
two cells containing carbon monoxide.  If the sample con-
tains carbon monoxide it will absorb some of the energy
of the infrared radiation that is at the carbon monoxide
absorption frequencies.  Thus the infrared radiation
leaving the sample cell will be deficient in energy
associated with the carbon monoxide absorption bands.
Since the detection cells are filled with carbon monoxide
they too would absorb energy in the absorption band of
carbon monoxide.  The detection cell associated with the
sample cell will  receive less energy in  the absorption
bands when more carbon monoxide is  in  the sample cell.
The detection cell associated with  the reference cell
will receive  the  same amount of energy in the  carbon
monoxide absorption bands.  The differences  in the  energy
absorbed by  the two detection  cells results  in a pressure
differential  which  is measured by the  deflection of a
diaphragm between the  two  cells.

      3.  Hydrocarbon  Measurement
      The hydrocarbon  measurement  is made by a Beckman
Hydrocarbon Analyzer,  model 109A.  The instrument  operates
 on the  principle  of flame-ionization.  A hydrogen  flame
 is established that burns  with a  negligible number of
 ions.   The  sample gases are introduced into the re-
 actants of  the flame.   If the  sample gases have hydro-
 carbons present they will form ions when they burn.  The
                            103

-------
ions are collected and result in a signal proportional to
the concentration of hydrocarbons in the sample.  It is
necessary to maintain constant flow rates to assure the
accuracy of the measurements.
                           104

-------
                       CHAPTER V
        THE EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM AND TEST RESULTS
A.  INTRODUCTION
     The objective of the experimental program is to de-
termine if the advantages of  the delayed mixing concept
shown "by the  theoretical study presented in Chapter II
can be realized  in an experimental  engine.  The experi-
mental program  is also  intended  to  show the influence of
major  input  variables on the  emissions, efficiency and
power.
     A CFR engine was modified  to  include  an  air  injec-
tion valve which can inject air at  various times  in  the
cycle  or  not at all. Typically a  rich charge would  be
drawn  into  the  combustion chamber.   The  charge is ignited
before top  dead center. Air is then injected into the
 combustion  chamber after the rich mixture has finished
 burning.  The combination of the rich mixture combustion
 followed by air injection is intended to represent the
 delayed  mixing concept as symbolized by L;A-P.  The delay
 between  the combustion of the rich mixture and mixing is
 controlled by the timing of the spark and  the air injec-
 tion.   Since it takes a finite amount of time for the
 air to mix and react with the rich products, this repre-
 sents a difference  from the theoretical concept which
 assumes that no time is required for the mixing.
                            105

-------
     The engine input variables were examined to determine
the best way to control and measure them, and to decide
which factors to vary and which to hold constant.
     In addition to the measurement of the nitrogen oxide
emissions, the carbon monoxide and hydrocarbon emissions
were measured.  The engine power and efficiency were
also determined.  A section is devoted to a discussion
of the theoretical trends expected in these results.
     The experimental program is divided into two sec-
tions.  The first set of tests were performed with a
large diameter air injection nozzle and the second set
of tests were performed with a small diameter air in-
jection nozzle.  Within each set of data the major
variables studied were the overall air-fuel ratio, the
timing of the start of air injection and, to a lesser
extent, the carbureted air-fuel ratio.  As the experi-
mental program proceeded, problems were  recognized and
fixed.  For this reason some of the data is more accurate
than  others.
      In general, the  data obtained from  each experiment
is punched on computer cards and then processed by  com-
puter programs  to  obtain the results in  a more convenient
form.  The computer programs used  to reduce the  data are
given in Appendix  H.
                           106

-------
B.  ENGINE INPUT VARIABLES



     Listed below are the important engine input variables



which influence the performance of the delayed mixing



stratified charge test engine.  These input variables



fall into two categories, those that can be changed while



the engine is in operation and those that require a



mechanical modification to the test facility.  The first



group will be called operational variables and the second



group will be called design variables.





     1.  Operational Variables



1)  Fuel Flow Rate:  The  fuel flow rate is controlled by



the main needle valve of  the carburetor and is measured



by the fuel scale.



2)  Carbureted Air Flow Rate:  The carbureted air flow



rate is controlled by the choke and engine speed.  A



laminar flow element and  an inclined manometer are used



to measure the flow rate.



3)  Injected Air Flow Rate:  The injected air flow rate



is controlled with the flow control valve and determined



by the upstream temperature, the upstream pressure and



downstream pressure of the flow restriction.



4-)  Start of Air Injection:  The start of air injection



is adjusted by selecting  the desired relative position



of the drive sprocket mounted on the crank shaft and the



driven sprocket  on the  cam valve before  the  drive chain





                           107

-------
is installed.  The position of the crank shaft is measured
on the flywheel and the position of the air injection
valve is measured by a protractor mounted on the driven
sprocket of the air injection valve.
5)  Spark Timing:  The spark timing is controlled "by ro-
tation of the housing containing the points and is mea-
sured by either an induction pick-up displayed on the
oscilloscope or by a timing light.
6)  Compression Ratio:  The compression ratio is controlled
by moving  the  engine  head  assembly  up  or  down with
a crank.  A micrometer measures the position  of the en-
gine head, from that measurement the compression ratio
can be determined,
7)  Engine Speed:  The engine speed is controlled by the
dynamometer  system and is  measured by both a  tachometer
and the  time between  top dead center pulses on  the
oscilloscope.
8)  Engine Inlet  Pipe Pressure:  The inlet pipe pressure
is controlled  by  the  choke and  is measured by a mano-
meter.
9)  Engine Inlet  Pipe Temperature:  The  inlet pipe  is
heated with  a  strip heater and  its  temperature  is mea-
sured by a thermocouple.
10)   Injection Air Temperature:   The  injection  air  tem-
perature can be  controlled by a heat  exchanger  and  is
measured by  a thermocouple.
                            108

-------
     2.  Design Variables
1)  Period of Air Injection:  The period of air injection
can be changed by changing the cam design, but was not
changed.
2)  Nozzle Geometry:  The nozzle diameter can be changed
to change the injection velocity and the nozzle direction
can be changed by drilling the nozzle at an angle to the
nozzle center line.
3)  Shrouded Valve:  A shrouded valve can be used to in-
duce swirl in the combustion chamber, but was not used.

     3.  Equivalence Ratios as Alternate Operational
         Variables
     It is customary to discuss engine performance in
terms of fuel-air (or air-fuel) ratio or equivalence
ratio because the performance is usually a strong func-
tion of these variables.  In general, equivalence ratio
will be used.  The set of three variables fuel flow
rate, carbureted air flow rate and injection air flow
rate will be replaced by an alternate set of three
variables carbureted equivalence ratio, overall equiv-
alence ratio and carbureted air flow rate.  It is
necessary to also include the carbureted air flow rate
in the second set in order to specify the amount of
charge.
                           109

-------
     4.   Specified Operational Variables



     Since there are ten operational variables it would



be impractical to methodically test all combinations.



If two levels of each variable were tested 1024 (2   =



1024) runs would be required.  It is necessary to hold



many of the variables roughly constant and examine those



of greatest interest.  Listed below are the variables which



were usually held constant and a justification for each.



     Engine Speed:  The engine speed was kept at about



800 RPM.  This was done because of concern over the



possibility of an air injection valve failure.  The dy-



namic forces on the cam follower of the air injection



valve increase with speed.  At 800 RPM  (13.3 rev/sec) the



valve sounds fine and should have a long life based on



calculation by the air injection valve computer program.



When lower speed operation was tried the coupling between



the dynamometer and the engine failed.  It has been re-



placed by a larger coupling and has operated well at 800



RPM  (13.3 rev/sec).



     Carbureted Air Flow  Rate:  For nearly all of the



runs the carbureted air flow rate was held constant  at  a



level equivalent  to a wide open choke and throttle at



800  RPM  (13.3 rev/sec).



     With the engine  speed held constant  it would be



possible to  change the mass  flow  rate of  carbureted  air





                           110

-------
by adjusting the choke, but it would also be necessary to
readjust the fuel flow rate at each point "because the
change in inlet pipe pressure affects fuel flow rate.  It
takes some  time to establish a constant fuel flow rate
because the fuel scale does not provide an instantaneous
measure of fuel flow rate, only an integrated average
value.  Several readings must be  taken at each fuel flow
setting to determine if the flow  is steady and at the
desired flow rate.
     The advantage  of  a constant  maximum  carbureted air
flow rate  is that once a constant fuel flow rate has
been established the carbureted equivalence ratio will
be constant.   It is then possible to  run  a  series of
tests at various overall equivalence  ratios by changing
only the rate  of air injection.
     With  a  constant carbureted air flow  rate  it  is
possible to  calculate  the  fuel  flow rate  desired  for  a
specific carbureted equivalence ratio and the  air in-
jection flow rate desired  for a specific  overall  equiv-
alence ratio.  A number of tables and curves  were made
to assist  in reaching  a specific  operating condition.
     Carbureted Equivalence Ratio:   In general,  the
carbureted equivalence ratio was  adjusted to  approximate-
ly l.Jf.  At this  condition only about 65 PPM of nitrogen
oxide are produced  by  the carbureted mixture.   This  value
                            111

-------
of equivalence ratio also corresponds to that used in the



theoretical model.



     Engine Inlet Pressure:  The engine inlet pressure is



related to the carbureted air flow rate which is held



constant, thus the engine inlet pressure will also be



constant.



     Compression Ratio:  At compression ratios much in



excess of seven the engine will knock.  It was



concluded that the engine should be operated at a com-



pression ratio of seven.



     Spark Timing:  In the large diameter nozzle tests,



the spark was arbitrarily set.  Later it was concluded



that the spark should be set at the maximum advance for



best torque (MBT).  The spark timing at the MBT repre-



sents the most power and best efficiency that can be



obtained at that  operating condition.





C.  A DISCUSSION  OF THE THEORETICAL TRENDS EXPECTED



    IN THE EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS



     1.  Nitrogen Oxide Emissions



     Both Chapter II and Chapter III have dealt with



the trends  in nitrogen  oxide emissions.  In  summary,



the nitrogen  oxide  emissions for a delayed stratified



charge engine can be expected to increase with leaner



overall  equivalence ratios, with leaner carbureted





                           112

-------
equivalence ratios, with earlier air injection and with
advanced spark timing.
     2.  Carbon Monoxide Emissions
     In engines the most significant factors affecting
the formation of carbon monoxide (CO) are the fuel-air
ratio and the CO chemical kinetics.  When a fuel-rich
mixture is burned  CO  is formed  instead of C02 because
of the lack of oxygen.  Thus  the richer the fuel-rich
mixture the greater the concentration of CO in the ex-
haust .
     Carbon monoxide  is also  found in the exhaust  of en-
gines when  operated with fuel-lean  mixtures.   The  exhaust
gas  concentration is  determined by the  fuel-air ratio,
the  temperatures,  the pressures and the  chemical  kinetic
history.   In  the combustion chamber the  equilibrium  con-
centration of CO is  high  after combustion and decreases
during expansion.  The actual CO concentration rapidly
approaches the high equilibrium value while temperatures
are high and attempts to  follow the decreasing equili-
brium values during expansion.  The chemical kinetics of
CO freezes during the expansion with the resulting CO
 concentration lying between that of the equilibrium
 value at combustion conditions and the equilibrium value
 at exhaust conditions.  Newhall (1969) has described this
 behavior of CO in great detail.
                            113

-------
     In the experimental engine the amount of CO found in
the exhaust will depend upon the mixing and reaction of
the injected air with the rich products of combustion.
If the injected air does not mix and react with rich pro-
ducts, large carbon monoxide emissions would result simi-
lar to those expected for homogeneous operation at the
carbureted fuel-air ratio.  If the injected air does
mix and react with the rich products, small carbon mon-
oxide emissions would result similar to those expected
for homogeneous operation at the overall fuel-air ratio.
     The carbon monoxide emissions for air injection
operation before combustion will also depend upon the
mixing process.  The more rapid the mixing the closer
the level of carbon monoxide emissions will be to the
homogeneous operation at the overall fuel-air ratio.
     With air injection the amount of charge is greater
because the injected air adds to the constant maximum
carbureted air intake.  Since the charge is greater the
cylinder pressure will also be greater.  The greater  cy-
linder pressure will not  influence the equilibrium con-
centration of CO but it may change the CO kinetics by
changing the concentration of other  species which are
pressure sensitive.  It would be necessary to perform
a  kinetics computer calculation to determine the pressure
effect  on  CO concentration.
                           114

-------
     3-  Hydrocarbon Emissions



     Daniel and Wentworth (1962) showed that the primary



source of hydrocarbon emissions for conventional four-



stroke spark ignition engines was due to the quenching



of the flame as it approached the cool combustion chamber



wall.  They also showed that oxidation of the hydrocarbon



emissions could occur in the exhaust pipe if sufficient



oxygen and high enough temperatures are present.



     After combustion is completed an envelope of un-



burned fuel-air mixture lies around the combustion chamber



surface.  The amount of unburned hydrocarbon contained



within the envelope depends of the volume of the envelope



and the fuel density within the envelope.  The volume of



the envelope is changed by changes in the quench dis-



tance, piston motion and air motion.  The envelope also



includes any crevices that are not penetrated by the



flame front, such as between piston and the cylinder.



     The thickness of the quench layer is a function of



pressure, temperature and fuel-air ratio.  Increases in



the temperature and pressure tend to decrease the quench



layer thickness.  The effect of fuel-air ratio on the



quench layer thickness is complicated by its affect on



the pressure and temperature.  In general, the quench



distance reaches a minimum thickness at a slightly rich



fuel-air ratio.  The amount of hydrocarbons in the





                           115

-------
quench layer will also depend on the fuel-air ratio.
Hydrocarbon emissions are found to decrease as the fuel-
air mixture is made leaner until they become low and rela-
tively constant for lean fuel-air mixtures.  But, if the
fuel-air mixture is made sufficiently lean to result in
misfire, the hydrocarbon level will increase due to the
unburned fuel.
     When air is injected into the cylinder before com-
bustion, there are many factors which will affect the
hydrocarbon level and it is difficult to conclude how
these factors will sum to influence the total hydrocarbon
emissions of early injection.  The increased pressure
forces more fuel-air mixture into the crevices favoring
higher hydrocarbon emissions, but also tends to reduce the
quench layer thickness favoring lower hydrocarbon emis-
sions.  The increased density of the quench envelope would
tend to increase the hydrocarbons.  When air is injected
during the compression stroke, it is unlikely that it will
be able to penetrate the boundary layers and crevices be-
fore combustion.  Consequently, the fuel-air mixture in the
quench envelope will be fuel-rich, which would tend to in-
crease the hydrocarbon emissions.  It is difficult to pre-
dict how the total hydrocarbon emissions of the early air
injection operation will compare to homogeneous operation
at the same overall fuel-air ratio.
     When air is injected after combustion, the quench
envelope has already been formed under conditions of
                            116

-------
the rich carbureted charge.  The greater fuel-air concen-
tration will tend to increase the hydrocarbon emissions.
In contrast, the injection of air will increase the veloci-
ties in the combustion chamber which will reduce the
boundary layer thickness and tend to reduce the hydro-
carbon emissions.  Again it is difficult to determine how
these factors affect the hydrocarbon emissions of the
late injection operation as compared to homogeneous
operation at the same overall fuel-air ratio.
     4.  Engine Power
     In a conventional homogeneous engine the specific
power  depends  on the engine  speed, spark timing,  fuel-
air ratio of the charge, amount of charge, compression
ratio and a number of other minor variables.  Engine
speed and compression ratio have been held constant for
most of the tests.  Spark timing has either been  held
constant or adjusted for the maximum advance for  best
torque operating condition.  For most operating condi-
tions the amount of carbureted charge was also held con-
stant at the maximum value.  Thus, the fuel-air ratio is
the most significant variable remaining.
     When the homogeneous engine is operated fuel-rich,
power is limited by the amount of air available for com-
bustion.  Since the carbureted charge is constant the
amount of power is expected to be nearly constant.  At
                           117

-------
very rich fuel-air ratios, the fuel will .displace some of
the air causing a slight reduction in power.  When the
homogeneous engine is operated fuel-lean, the power is
limited by the amount of fuel available  for combustion.
As the fuel-air ratio becomes leaner the power will de-
crease .
     Engine operation with air injection results in a
larger charge since the carbureted charge  is constant
and the injected air will add to the total charge.  The
extent of the increase in power associated with the
larger charge will depend of the total amount of charge,
the air injection timing, the carbureted fuel-air and
the overall fuel-air ratios.
     The air which is injected into the  combustion chamber
must be compressed to the appropriate pressure.  The work
required to compress the air will  depend on  the process
used.  If a method of compressing  the air  in the cylin-
der along with  the rich  charge and by the  combustion
process can be  developed,then external  compressors will
not be required.  The work  of compressing  the air would
be similar to that of compressing  the charge.   In the
experimental  engine  system,the air is compressed separ-
ately to  greater than  injection  pressure and stored  in
gas bottles  until it is  injected.   The  work used to
 drive the compressor is  not a reasonable estimate  of the

                            118

-------
work required to compress the air for injection.  It has
been assumed that the air compression work is best re-
presented by an isentropic compression for room tempera-
ture and pressure to injection pressure as measured in
the accumulator before the air injection valve.
     5.  Engine Efficiency
     The fuel-air ratio  significantly influences efficiency
for both homogeneous operation and  air injection opera-
tion.  With air injection operation two fuel-air ratios
have to be considered, that  of the  carbureted  charge
and that of the overall  charge including the injected air.
The efficiency for  homogeneous charge engines  is expected
to drop sharply for fuel-rich mixtures because of  the
lack of oxygen to complete the combustion  process.  Like-
wise making a fuel-lean  mixture  leaner results in  better
efficiency because  the combustion process  goes nearer
to completion.
     During air  injection operation the  efficiency assoc-
iated  with the  combustion of the rich charge would
correspond to the  efficiency of  the homogeneous opera-
tion at the  same  rich fuel-air ratio.   The addition of
air to the rich charge will  tend to complete the  combus-
tion process  and increase the efficiency over  that of the
carbureted charge  alone.  When the air enters  the  combus-
tion chamber early in the expansion it can do  useful work

                           119

-------
through expansion even if it does not re.act.  Increasing
the amount of air injected will make the overall mixture
leaner and further increase the efficiency.  The efficiency
of the delayed mixing engine will fall somewhere between
the efficiency of the homogeneous operation corresponding
to the carbureted fuel-air ratio and to the overall fuel-
air ratio.
     If the air injection occurs late in the expansion
process, little additional work can be extracted because
the amount of expansion which remains is small and in-
sufficient time may remain during the expansion to mix
and react the air with the rich products.   On the other
hand if air is injected early, before combustion, it will
have time to form a more nearly homogeneous mixture at
the overall fuel-air ratio.  Under  this  form of opera-
tion the  efficiency should approach that of a correspond-
ing homogeneous  operation at the  same overall fuel-air
ratio.  The efficiency of air  injection  operation is
expected  to be between that  of homogeneous operation
with the  carbureted fuel-air ratio  and with the overall
fuel-air  ratio.
     Spark  timing  is used to adjust for  maximum engine
torque.   When the  engine  is  operating at the maximum
torque it is  also  operating  at the  maximum efficiency
because the power  output is  greatest for a constant amount
                            120

-------
of fuel input.  With the spark too far advanced the com-
pression work will "be done against combustion pressure
and with the spark too far retarded the pressure peak
will occur later in the expansion.  In either operating
condition the efficiency will "be less than maximum.
     Another factor which affects the efficiency of the
engine is the heat transfered to the combustion chamber
walls.  The convective heat transfer will be increased
by greater velocities in the combustion chamber.  When
air is injected the velocities will be greater because
of the kinetic energy of the air  jet.  The efficiency
of air injection operation could be lower due to more
heat transfer than corresponding homogeneous operation.
     Two measures of efficiency will be used in the pre-
sentation of results.  The measured indicated enthalpy
efficiency is based on the brake horsepower of the  engine
plus  the  mounted horsepower.   The corrected indicated
enthalpy efficiency  is based on the brake horsepower
plus the motored  horsepower less an estimated power re-
 quired to compress the injected air.
D.  LARGE DIAMETER NOZZLE TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
     1.  Check-Out
     Much of  the initial  operation was  intended to  check-
out the system and to determine how best to control the

                          121

-------
the system.  Some mechanical problems with the air in-



jection valve were discovered and corrected.  The coupling



between the engine and the dynamometer was too small and



had to be replaced.  The carburetor float bowl was first



replaced by a larger one and later both float bowls were



placed in series to stabilize the fuel flow rate.  It



was necessary to replace the fuel pump, one was pur-



chased which incorporated a pressure regulator.  The new



fuel pump greatly improved the stability of the fuel



flow to the carburetor.  Improvements were made to the



fuel scale to improve  its accuracy.  Although the re-



pairs and maintenance  were time consuming they did not



represent  significant  technical problems.




     2.  Test Conditions for Large Diameter Nozzle



     The large  diameter nozzle has a diameter of  .3125



inches  (7.938 mm)  and  is directed perpendicular  to  the



center  line  of  the cylinder  and  into the clearance  volume.



A flow  restriction consisting  of  a  .0935 inch  (2.37  mn)



hole  in a  disc  was placed  between the  air injection valve



 seat  and the nozzle.   The  flow restriction caused an in-



 crease  in  the air injection accumulator pressure to pre-



 vent  the flow of combustion product  into the  air injection



 valve.   The maximum velocity through the flow restriction



 is sonic velocity which resulted in the maximum velocity



 from the nozzle of about one hundred feet per second.





                           122

-------
     The engine was operated near 800 RPM with the maximum
carbureted air flow rate.  The compression ratio was held
constant at seven.  The spark timing was held constant at
10° BTDC.  Both the injection air temperature and the
carbureted air temperature were uncontrolled.  These
temperatures were usually above room temperature due to
higher temperature of the engine.
     The magnitude of the other variables which changed
during the testing are shown  in the figures.
     All testing with the large diameter nozzle was done
with air injection after the  start of  combustion.
     3.  Summary  of Results for Large  Diameter Nozzle
1)  The nitrogen  oxide emissions  for operation with air
injection are much lower than homogeneous  engine  opera-
tion at the same  overall air-fuel ratio.
2)  The  carbon monoxide  emissions for  operation with  air
injection are essentially the same as  homogeneous engine
operation at the  same  overall air-fuel ratio.
3)  The  hydrocarbon emissions for operation with  air  in-
jection  are lower than homogeneous engine  operation at
the  same  overall  air-fuel ratio.
4)  The  measured  indicated  enthalpy  efficiency for
operation with  air injection is  lower than homogeneous
engine  operation  at the  same  overall air-fuel ratio.
                            123

-------
5)  The corrected indicated enthalpy efficiency for opera-
tion with air injection is much lower than homogeneous
engine operation at the same overall air-fuel ratio.
     4.  Nitrogen Oxide Emissions for Large Diameter
         Nozzle
     A set of NO  emission results for the low velocity
nozzle is shown in Figure 28.  The homogeneous curve was
obtained by operating the engine without air injection
at various overall equivalence ratios.  At very rich
operation the nitric oxide concentrations are very low.
As the overall equivalence ratio becomes leaner the
nitric oxide increases until it peaks at about /  = .95.
At this equivalence ratio the engine combustion becomes
unstable which in part accounts for reduced NO  at lower
overall equivalence ratios.  The lower flame temperatures
associated with fuel lean operation also reduce the NO
                                                      X
emissions.  An NO  peak with slightly fuel-lean mixtures
is typical of homogeneous engine operation.
     Also shown in Figure 28 is a set of results with
air injection having a carbureted equivalence ratio (/_)
                                                      c
of about 1.4 and at various air injection timings.  With
the start of air injection at 42° ATDC (crank angle
degrees^ very little additional NO  is formed due to  an
injection.  Advancing the air injection to start at 22°
ATDC increases the N0x slightly.  With the air injection

                           124

-------
 1000  —
I  300
o
SE

-------
starting at 12° ATDC,the amount of NO  formed increases
                                     Jv.


markedly.  When the air is injected earlier, it is injected



into higher temperature products.   Thus,  in the  process of



mixing and reacting with the rich products,it is more



likely to produce additional NO  emissions.
                               X


     For each of the air injection timings, the curves were



connected to the homogeneous operating point corresponding



to their carbureted equivalence ratio.  The point on the



homogeneous curve represents the amount of NO  which is
                                             Jv.


formed during the period of rich combustion.  The in-



jection of air will reduce the overall equivalence ratio



and result in additional NO  formation.   It  is possible
                           Jt.


to operate at different points along the  curve by chang-



ing the amount of air which is injected.



     One set of data was obtained  at a carbureted equiv-



alence ratio of about 1.6 and with air injection starting



at Jj-20 ATDC.  Although the NO  formed by  the  carbureted
                             J\.


charge is lower than that formed by /c =  1.^ the ex-



haust NO   is about  the  same.  The slope  of the  curve
         Jv


is much  steeper than the corresponding curve at  tfc = 1.4-



with air injection starting at 42° ATDC.   The  difference



in the shape  of the  curves  can be  explained by consider-



ing the  differences  in  the  amounts of air which must be



injected.  To  reach  an  overall stoichiometric equivalence



ratio, it is  necessary to inject  k-Q%> more  air into  the





                           126

-------
combustion chamber if the carbureted equivalence ratio
is 1.4- but 60$ more air if the carbureted equivalence
ratio is 1.6.  Since the total charge will be substantial-
ly greater, the cylinder pressure will be greater.  The
relative increase in pressure will compress the products
of combustion and increase their temperature.  The
higher temperature will result in more rapid nitric oxide
formation.
     5.  Carbon Monoxide for Large Diameter Nozzle
     Presented in Figure 29 is a plot of the exhaust gas
carbon monoxide versus overall equivalence ratio.  The
homogeneous operating points, indicated by squares,
are connected by the solid line.  The other points,
representing air injection operation, are not connected
because they are very near the homogeneous curve.
     These results show that the injected air has suf-
ficient time to mix and react with the products of the
rich charge.  The combustion is completed to the same
degree as homogeneous operation with the same overall
equivalence ratio.  Under these air injection operating
conditions, the exhaust emissions of carbon monoxide are
mainly a function of overall equivalence ratio.
     6.  Hydrocarbon Emissions Large Diameter Emissions
     The hydrocarbon emissions are presented in Figure
30.  For operation with air injection, the hydrocarbon
level is substantially below that of the homogeneous
                           127

-------
    3-0
c
o
o
fc
0>
p.
o
2
o
c
o
o

0>
•o
•H
X
o
c
o
c
o

€
id
o
    2.0
1.0
                                Homogeneous

                                  Operation
                                        6
                                     si
                              O 12°ATDC
                                 22°ATDG
                                  A i*2°ATDC


                                  O ^2




                                  I	I
1.38

1.38

1.6
             .8        l.O       1.2


                  Overall Equivalence Ratio
                                                1.6
     Figure 29
              Carbon Monoxide  Emissions  versus

              Overall  Equivalence  Ratio  for

              Various  Air  Injection Timings

              With a Large Diameter Nozzle
                          128

-------
    3000
c
o
a)
o

e
ex
c
o
-p
c
0)
o
d
o
o

c
o
43
t-l
rt
o
o
2000
1000
                   J.
                    J_
                                    Homogeneous

                                      Operation
                                       si
                                O  12°ATDC
                                       22°ATDC
                                    A


                                    O
_L
             .8        1.0        1.2        1



                   Overall  Equivalence  Ratio
                                             1.38


                                             1.38

                                             1.6
                                                  1.6
      Figure 30
               Hydrocarbon  Emissions  versus Overall


               Equivalence  Ratio  for  Various Air


               Injection  Timings  With a Large

               Diameter Nozzle
                           129

-------
operation with the same overall equivalence ratio.  The
most likely explanation for the lower hydrocarbons is
that the turbulence and general increase in the motion
of the charge due to air injection reduces the thickness
of the quench layer.
     ?.  Engine Efficiency for Large Diameter Nozzle
     Because the injection air is compressed separate-
ly from the engine the measured output power does not
include the work required to compress the injection air.
An estimate of the work required to compress the in-
jected air is made and subtracted from the measured work.
As a result the efficiency can be presented as measured
values or corrected values.  In Figure 31 both the mea-
sured and corrected indicated enthalpy efficiencies are
presented.
     The homogeneous efficiencies reach a maximum at
an overall equivalence ratio of  .95-  The efficiency is
lower for leaner operation because the engine experiences
partial  misfire.  The homogeneous efficiency is lower
at greater equivalence ratios because of the incomplete
combustion of the  fuel.
     Engine operation with air injection shows a general
 increase in measured efficiencies with  leaner equivalence
ratios.   If no air were injected, measured efficiency
would be  equal to  that of the homogeneous operation at
                          130

-------
    3o
                                         e
                                          SI
                        Operation
                                  O  12°ATDG

                                  ^7  22°ATDG

                                  A  42°ATDC

                                  O  42°ATDC
1.38

1.38

1.6
-p

o
o
fc
0)
ex
III
w
T3

as
    20
                  M = Measured Indicated
                      Enthalpy Efficiency

                  C = Corrected Indicated
                      Enthalpy Efficiency
           .8
  Figure  31
                     1.0        1.2        1.4

                Overall Equivalence  Ratio


                Measured and Corrected Indicated
                Enthalpy Efficiency versus Overall
                Equivalence Ratio for Various Air
                Injection Timings With a  Large
                Diameter Nozzle
    1.6
                         131

-------
the carbureted equivalence ratio.  As the -amount of in-
jected air increases the measured efficiency increases
and the overall equivalence ratio becomes leaner.  The
addition of high pressure air during the expansion
stroke will result in more measured work.  Also, when the
air mixes with the rich products, it will tend to finish
the combustion process, causing higher pressures and an
increase in measured work.  Although the measured
efficiency is increased with air injection, it is less
than homogeneous operation at the same overall equivalence
ratio.  The lower measured efficiency is  due to combus-
tion being completed late  in the expansion stroke.  The
later in the expansion stroke the combustion occurs
the smaller will be the amount of expansion work.
     When the measured work is corrected  by subtracting
the estimated work of compressing the injected air, the
resulting corrected efficiency tends to decrease with
increasing amounts of air  injection.  Apparently the
increased amount of work produced by the  injected  air  is
less  than work required to compress  the air.  A  large
compression ratio  is required to bring atmospheric air
to injection pressure  and  only a small expansion ratio
is available  in the engine.  If  the  air  did not  react  in
the combustion chamber and only  expanded, the lower
                           132

-------
expansion ratio would limit the work extracted from the
air to something less than the compression work.
     8.  Discussion of Results for Large Diameter Nozzle
     The low values of carbon monoxide and hydrocarbons
lead to the conclusion that the injected air does mix
and react to complete the combustion process.  However,
the measured indicated enthalpy efficiency shows only
slightly more output power as a result of air injection.
It appears that the combustion occurs too late  in the
expansion to contribute much to output power.  Either
the mixing is too  slow or the air  is injected too late
in the expansion.  It was decided  that the mixing should
be increased by changing the nozzle to a smaller dia-
meter to obtain a  higher velocity  for more rapid
mixing.
     The large diameter nozzle was picked  initially be-
cause  of the lower pressure  drop across  it.   In a
practical engine  it would be desirable to  have  the
minimum pressure  drop across the nozzle.   The engine is
going  to have to  provide the work  required to inject or
mix the air with  the rich products of  combustion.

E.  SMA.LL DIAMETER NOZZLE TEST RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
     1.  Test Conditions for Small Diameter  Nozzle
     The small diameter nozzle has a  diameter of  .0935
 inches (2.3Tmm)  and is directed  at an angle of 45 degrees
                           133

-------
from a perpendicular to the center line of the cylinder
in a plane parallel to the pistonb top surface.  The dia-
meter was selected to "be equal to that of the flow re-
striction placed between the nozzle and .the air injection
valve seat for the large diameter nozzle tests.  In this
way, flow through the valve would be similar for both types
of nozzles.
     The engine was operated near 800 RPM with the maximum
carbureted air flow rate.  Compression ratio was maintained
at seven.  The spark timing was varied in attempts to
operate at the maximum advance for best timing, but these
conditions were not always obtained.  The injection air
temperature was uncontrolled and was above room tempera-
ture due to temperature of the engine.  The carbureted
fuel-air mixture was heated for some of the test con-
ditions by a strip heater wrapped around the inlet pipe.
     For the small diameter nozzle, some of the opera-
tion was with air injection before combustion.  These
points were run to show the entire range of air-injection
timings.
     The  values for important variables which changed
during the tests are shown  in the figures or  in Table II.
     2.  Summary of Results for Small Diameter Nozzle
l)  The nitrogen oxide emissions  for engine  operation
with air  injection usually increase with leaner overall
 equivalence  ratios.
                           134

-------
2)  The nitrogen oxide emissions for engine operation
with air injection when compared to homogeneous operation
at the same overall equivalence ratio  are much lower  with
air injection after combustion,  are about the same with
air injection "before and rapidly  increase with earlier
air injection during combustion.
3)  The carbon monoxide emissions  for  engine  operation
with air injection are usually  the  same as those of homo-
geneous operation at the same  overall  equivalence ratio,
but greater for air injection during combustion,  very
early in  the compression,  or very late in the expan-
sion.
4)  The hydrocarbon emissions  for engine operation with
air injection are usually lower than homogeneous operation
at  the same overall equivalence ratio  if leaner than 1.15.
but greater for air injection during combustion or
or  very early in the  compression.
5)  The measured indicated enthalpy efficiency for engine
operation  with air  injection is always less than homo-
geneous operation at  the  same overall  equivalence ratio.
The measured efficiency for air injection operation  is
low with  air injection after combustion, approaches  the
homogeneous operation with air injection before combus-
tion and  is generally low with air injection during
 combustion.
                            135

-------
6)  The corrected enthalpy efficiency for engine operation
with air injection is always much lower than homogeneous
operation at the same overall equivalence ratio.
?)  The measured indicated mean effective pressure for en-
gine operation with air injection is higher with lean
operation and with early air injection.  Air injection
after combustion has low IMEP.  With air injection during
combustion the measured IMEP is at a minimum.
8)  When air is injected before combustion the combustion
process is rapid, the cycle to cycle pressure variations
are small, and the peak pressure is greater than the
corresponding homogeneous operation.
9)  When air is injected very early in  the compression
stroke  (128° BTDC) the combustion process will result
in knock.
10)  Air injection can cause up to k-Q%  more heat trans-
ferred  to the cooling water on the basis of BTU per
pound of charge.
     3.  Nitrogen Oxide Emissions for Small Diameter
         Nozzle
     The nitrogen oxide emissions associated with homo-
geneous operation are  shown in Figure  32.  The  data re-
presents a band  rather than a single line because of  the
variation  in the spark timing,  same  operation was with
                           136

-------
   3000
  1000
&
p.
o
25


a   300
T3
•H

§

c
o>
    100
    30
                       \     L    1111
            .8         1.0       1*2       1.4



                 Overall Equivalence Ratio
1.6
     Figure 32    Nitrogen Oxide Emissions for

                  Various Homogeneous Operating

                  Conditions
                         137

-------
engine inlet pipe heated, the accumulation of small mea-
surement errors, and the small variation in operating
conditions.  The maximum nitrogen oxide emissions occur
at a slightly lean equivalence ratio as would be expected.
The engine was not operated much leaner than the maximum
NO  because of the start of misfiring.
  J\.
     In Figure 33 a few  typical air injection operating
conditions are shown along with the band of homogeneous
operation as a function of overall equivalence ratio.
This same set of data will be shown for the other results
versus overall equivalence ratio.  In general, starting
air-injection earlier in the cycle results in large
nitrogen oxide emissions.  With air injection consider-
ably before combustion as represented by the start of
air injection at 38° BTDC and 88° BTDC the nitrogen
oxide emissions correspond to the levels expected from
homogeneous operation at the same overall equivalence
ratio.  When air injection is very late in the cycle
(92° ATDC) leaner equivalence ratios cause a reduction
in the nitrogen oxide concentration.  The air injection
occurs when the temperatures are so low that little addi-
tional nitrogen oxide is formed and the air reduces the
concentration by dilution.
     In order to better  show the influence of the timing
of air injection on nitrogen oxide and other results,
                           138

-------
  3000
X ~~ " ^
\

N \ A
A \ 0
/v\ v

si
92°ATDG
22°ATDC
2°ATDG

X
^C
1.39
1.42
1.43
i 10
  1000
p.
p.
o
2;
5   300
•H
g
-P
•H
2
    100
     30
                    18°BTDC  1.43

                    38°BTDG  1.40

                    88°BTDC  1.41
                      Homogeneous
                        Operation
L_J	«	L
                                       I     1	L
                                   J
            .8        1.0        1.2        1.4       1.6

                 Overall Equivalence Ratio
    Figure  33
Nitrogen Oxide Emissions versus
Overall Equivalence Ratio for
Selected Air Injection Operating
Conditions With a Small Diameter
Nczzle
                          139

-------
they will be plotted versus start of air injection.  Since
various operating conditions were run at one air injec-
tion timing the points shown will correspond to an over-
all stoichiometric mixture.  The magnitude of any speci-
fic point was obtained by plotting the variable versus
overall equivalence ratio, fitting a curve to the data
and noting the intersection of that curve with a stoichio-
metric mixture.  A summary of the extrapolated stoichio-
metric results is shown in Table II.  Generally the car-
bureted equivalence ratio was about 1.4.  A carbureted
equivalence ratio is estimated for each point in Table
II.  Also shown in Table II is the spark timing and start
of air injection.
     The nitrogen oxide emissions versus the start of
air injection are presented in Figure 3^-  Generally NO
                                                      J\.
is low for air injection after combustion and high for
air injection before combustion.  When the air injection
occurs near top dead center during combustion, the nit-
rogen oxide emissions are very sensitive to changes in
the air  injection timing and to  changes in the other
variables.  The spread  in the nitrogen oxide emission
at 2° ATDC and 8° BTDC  attest to the sensitivity of this
region.
     It  was particularly  difficult to adjust the spark
for the  best  torque with  air injection near top dead

                           140

-------
                   TABLE II

Summary of Results for Air Injection  Operation
      Extrapolated to a Stoichiometric
              Fuel-Air Mixture
Symbol

O
A
O
A
O
O
O
O
<7
O
O
v
O
O
O
O
A
A
A
o
e .
SI
(deg.)
92
22
22
2
2
2
2
-8
-8
-8
-8
-18
-28
-28
-38
-48
-68
-78
-88
-128
6
sp
(deg.)
-26
-30
-30
-20
-20
-30
-40
-10
-10
-20
-22
-30
+10
-6
-8
0
-6
-5
-10
-6
*

1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
c

39
42
60
44
38
43
35
36
39
40
42
43
,44
,24
,40
.39
1.42
1.45
1.41
1.42
NO
X
(ppm)
59
100
97
95
115
160
150
630
260
285
185
580
1350
1250
1200
1650
1250
1200
1200
260
CO
W
2.6
.5
.55
>3.0
3.0
.45
.40
1.4
>3.0
1.5
2.4
1.0
.92
1.3
.6
.85
1.3
.5
.5
2.6
HC
(ppm-C)
1150
720
950
1850
1800
780
750
1300
2030
1100
1550
700
1150
1250
640
1220
1000
1350
630
1900
Meas .
IEE
(%
21.
24.
22.
22.
21.
24.
24.
)
2
5
8
5
,5
.5
.2
24.2
21,
23,
22
22
21
26
24
25
25
26
25
22
.6
.4
.3
.7
.1
.0
.8
.8
.0
.5
.1
.3
Meas.
IMEP
(psi)
165
133
132
120
113
130
120
122
111
120
120
123
137
128
129
136
132
142
134
128
                       141

-------
J\J\J\J


1000
s
p<
p.
t
.§ 300
-H
c
d»
o
•H
z
100
30i

. ' ./*' ' , _, '" x' . ' /'~
- ' Homogeneous Case 4> = 1 .
/ ' - •
O.
/ /
/\/\ & /'"^Cy
mat-
••

9
o
&
"

o
r A 6
•w
^ t 1 1 i 1 1 t i 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1
20 80 , 40 0 40
BTDG TDC ATDC
     Start of Air Injection - Crank Angle Degrees
Figure 34
Nitrogen Oxide Emissions versus Start
of Air Injection for Overall Stoichio-
metric Equivalence Ratio With a Small
Diameter Nozzle
                      142

-------
center.  When the air is injected "before combustion the
best timing is about 6° BTDC probably because of the
greater turbulence.  When the air is injected after com-
bustion the best spark timing is about 25° BTDC.  Also
changes in the spark timing will affect the timing of
the pressure peak in the cylinder, which in turn influences
the injection air pressure.  The injection air pressure
takes  some time to  stabilize.  Thus, if one were to ad-
just the spark timing by merely observing the engine
torque it would be  easy to select the wrong timing.  Ob-
servation of the cylinder pressure was used to determine
the spark timing near top dead center.  This method re-
quires judgment as  to the most appropriate position of
the pressure peak with respect to top  dead center.  The
adjustment  of  spark timing by observing  the  cylinder
pressure is better  than  observing the  engine torque, but
not exact.
     The spread  in  the nitrogen  oxide  data with air in-
 jection  starting at 2° ATDC  can  be  explained mainly by
the spark timing.   The two  points  with the  greatest
nitrogen oxide emission  have spark  timings  of  30  BTDC
and 40°  BTDC; from  the  pressure trace the spark is too ad-
vanced.  The  two  other points have  spark timings of 20
BTDC;  from  the pressure  trace the spark is too retarded.
 The advanced timing causes  higher pressures and temperature
                           143

-------
which result  in more nitrogen oxide emissions.  The re-



tarded timing causes lower pressures and temperatures



which result  in low nitrogen oxide emissions.



     The two points with 20° BTBC spark timing with start



of air injection at 2° ATDC differ in their carbureted



equivalence ratio.  The low nitrogen oxide point also



corresponds to the richer carbureted equivalence ratio.



Since the richer carbureted equivalence ratio would pro-



duce less nitrogen oxide before air injection it is rea-



sonable to expect a lower final nitrogen oxide emission.



     The same type of reasoning can be  used to explain



the spread in the nitrogen  oxide  data points with air



injection at 8° BTDC.  The  more advanced timing results



in greater NO  emissions and richer carbureted equivalence
             A.


ratio result in lower NO  emissions.



     When air is  injected before  combustion the nitrogen



oxide concentration  corresponds to  that of homogeneous



operation with the same  overall equivalence ratio.



Apparently the injected  air mixes quickly  to  form a some-



what  homogeneous  mixture at the overall equivalence ratio



before  combustion.



      *K  Carbon Monoxide Emissions  for  Small  Diameter



         Nozzle


      The  carbon monoxide emissions  for  homogeneous  opera-



 tion are presented in Figure 35-   A  curve drawn through




                            144

-------
    3.0
c
0)
o
*-.
0)
Pk
c
o
2
•p
c
0)
o

o
o

Q)
TJ
•H
X
o
c
o
s

c
o
rt
o
    2.0  —
l.C   —
             .8        1.0       1.2


                  Overall Equivalence  Ratio
                                                 1.6
       Figure 35    Carbon Monoxide Emissions  versus
                    Overall Equivalence  Ratio  for
                    Homogeneous Operation
                          145

-------
the data points describes the homogeneous carbon
monoxide emissions.  For rich operation the carbon mon-
oxide levels are high while for lean operation the carbon
monoxide emissions are low.
     The carbon monoxide emissions for the typical set
of air injection operating conditions are presented  in
Figure 36 along with the dotted line corresponding to
the homogeneous operation.  All of the data points fall
near the homogeneous curve except for operation with the
start of air injection at 8° BTDC and 92° ATDC.  High
values of carbon monoxide are expected with very late
air injection  (92° ATDG) because  of  the  short time avail-
able for combustion and  because  of  the low temperatures
     Many points with air injection starting near top
dead center have greater carbon monoxide emissions than
homogeneous operation as seen in Figure 37.  It is pos-
sible that air being injected during the period of com-
bustion, as is the case for these points, can  quench and
disturb the combustion process.  Probably the  regions  of
incomplete combustion do not mix and as a result appear
in the exhaust.
     5.  Hydrocarbon Emissions for Small Diameter Nozzle
     The hydrocarbon emissions for homogeneous operation
are shown  in Figure 38.  Two factors account  for the
spread  in  hydrocarbon emissions.  Part way through the
                           146

-------
    3.0
-p
c
4)
O
f-l
4>
PH
O
£

c
o>
O
c
O
O

4)
T3
.H
X
O
c
O
£

C
O
,0
    2.0
                               /O
                               U-	Homogeneous
                                      Operation
                                         e
                                          si
                                   O
92°ATDC

22°ATDG

 2°ATDG

 8°BTDG
                                       18°BTDG

                                   0 38°BTDC

                                       88°BTDC
      0
                             i
            .8        1.0       1.2       1.4


                  Overall Eauivalence Ratio
                                                1.39
                                                1 . 39
                                                1.40

                                                1.41
                                                    1.6
      Fig-are 36
                   Carbon Monoxide Emissions versus
                   Overall Equivalence Ratio for Air
                   Injection Operation With a
                   Small Diameter Nozzle
                         147

-------
3.u
c
0)
o
0)
i 2.0
c
o
-p
g
c
0)
o
c
o
o
0)
•o
•H
X
o 1.0
c
o
as
c
o
JO
(L,
OS
0


/~»
— 	 O 	
O








o
. 0 °
tJ


,
— ^/
O
o
_


/^>w
V_/
L ^^ Q a
/ v
- L— Homogeneous Case $ = 1
i i i i i i i i t i 1 i i i 1 _j —
120 bO 40 0 40
BTDC TDC ATDC
    Start of Air Injection - Crank Angle Degrees
Figure 3?
Carbon Monoxide Emissions Versus Start
of Air Injection for Overall Stoichio-
metric Equivalence Ratio With a Small
Diameter Nozale
                      148

-------
    3000
c
o
rt
o
    2000
c
o

'•p


I
c
0)
o
c
o
o

c
o

•s
0)
o
o
    1000
                                              D
                  j	I
                             I	I
I	I
             •8         1.0       1.2       1



                  Overall Equivalence Ratio
                                                    1.6
       Figure 38    Hydrocarbon Emissions versus

                    Overall Equivalence Ratio for

                    Homogeneous Operation
                         149

-------
testing program it was found that the wall of the engine



inlet pipe was wetted by fuel and there existed the pos-



sibility of liquid fuel entering the inlet valve.  For



this reason the walls of the inlet manifold were heated.



As a result of the heater the hydrocarbon emissions



dropped.  Another factor is the improvement of the cali-



bration procedure of the hydrocarbon analyzer.  The hydro-



carbon analyzer is sensitive to the flow rate of sample



and calibration gas.  These two flow rates should be the



same.  A pressure regulator in the  instrument is used to



adjust the scale reading to correspond  to the hydrocarbon



concentration  of calibration gas.   It was found  that



changes  in the calibration gas pressure supplied to the



instrument would change the calibration gas  flow rate.



A procedure was devised to measure  the  calibration gas



flow  rate with the  carbon monoxide  flow meter and  to  set



the  flow rate  equal  to the  sample  flow  rate.



      The hydrocarbon emissions  for the  typical  set of



air  injection timings are shown  in  Figure  39  along  with



the  dotted  lines  representing the  band  of homogeneous



operating results.   With  the  exception of air injection



starting at 8° BTDC the  data shows lower hydrocarbon



emissions for air injection operation with overall



 equivalence ratios leaner than 1.15.  With air injection



 starting very late in the expansion (92° ATDC), the




                           150

-------
    3000
c
o
X)
k
rt
o
P.
C
o
d
o>
o
C
o
o


o
£>
t-i
cd
o
I
    2000
1000
                                   92°ATDC  1.39

                                A 22°ATDC  1.42

                                O  2°ATDC  1.43

                                    8°BTDG  1.39

                                   18°BTDC  1.43

                                   38°BTDC  1.40

                                   88°BTDC  1.41
            .8        1.0       1.2       1.4


                  Overall Equivalence Ratio
                                                1.6
       Figure 39
                Hydrocarbon Emissions versus
                Overall Equivalence Ratio for
                Air Injection Operation with a
                Small Diameter Nozzle
                          151

-------
hydrocarbons are nearer the homogeneous operation.  The



greater turbulence in the chamber reduces the hydrocarbon



envelope and consequently the hydrocarbon emissions.



     Air injection starting near top dead center results



in greater hydrocarbon emissions as shown in Figure ^0.



The disturbance of the combustion process by air injection



would account for the greater hydrocarbons and would be



consistent with the greater carbon monoxide emissions



found for the same injection timing.




     6.  Engine Efficiency for Small Diameter Nozzle



     Shown in Figure 4-1 is the measured indicated en-



thalpy efficiency as a function of the overall equivalence



ratio for the homogeneous operation.  The efficiency de-



creases with richer equivalence ratios.  The spread in



the data is primarily due to variations in the timing



and the accuracy of reading the dynamometer force.  The



low speed of the engine and the cycle to cycle variations



of the engine resulted in a pulsating output torque.  The



needle on the dynamometer scale would vibrate requiring



an estimate of its average value.



     The measured indicated enthalpy efficiency for the



typical  set of air injection data is shown in Figure ^2



with the homogeneous operation shown by dotted lines.



Earlier air injection as well as leaner overall operation



tend to increase the measured indicated enthalpy  efficiency.





                            152

-------
   3000
c
o
JO

a
o

6  2000
c
o
cd

-p
c
0)
o
C
o
o


§   1000
 cd
 o
 o
                              Homogeneous  Case    =  1
                A
                             0
      '
           J	1	L
                      II  I
                                J	I	L
              J	I	L
        120
                   80
 40

BTDC
  0

TDC
 40

ATDC
         Start of Air Injection - Crank Angle Degrees
    Figure
                 Hydrocarbon Emissions versus Start of

                 Air Injection for Overall Stoichiometric
                 Equivalence Ratio with a Small Diaweter
                 Nozzle
                          153

-------
     30
     20
c
0)
o
IH
t>
P,
W
3
to
flS
o
10
            .8        1.0        1.2


             Overall Equivalence Ratio
                                               1.6
Figure
                  Measured Indicated Enthalpy Efficiency
                  versus Overall Equivalence Ratio for
                  Homogeneous Operation
                        154

-------
     30
     20
c

-------
Note that with injection "before combustion,the measured
efficiency is less than the corresponding homogeneous
operation.  The difference in efficiencies is probably
due to greater heat transfer caused air injection induced
charge motion.  An increase of 40$ in the heat transferred
to the cooling water on the basis of BTU per pound charge
was measured for  operation with air injection.
     In Figure 4-3 the corrected indicated  enthalpy
efficiency is shown as a  function of overall equivalence
ratio.  With injection before  combustion the corrected
efficiency is about equal to the efficiency  of  the
homogeneous operation with the carbureted  equivalence
ratio.  The estimated work required to  compress  the  air
is  a  substantial  percentage  of the engine  output.
      The  measured indicated enthalpy  efficiency is plotted
versus  the start  of air  injection  in  Figure  *»4.   The
greater measured  efficiencies  occur when the air is  in-
 jected  into  the  combustion chamber before ignition.   The
measured efficiency  is  larger because the injected air
 has time to  mix with the rich charge  before combustion
 thus allowing more fuel to burn nearer top dead center.
When air injection occurs well into the expansion stroke
 little additional work can be obtained from the comple-
 tion of combustion.
      With the start of air injection at 2° ATDC the spread
 in the efficiency can be attributed to the different spark
                            156

-------


30










-p 20
c
o
0)
p.
1
w
M
-P
O
£
£ 10
o
o





0
\
\
-
N ^ .^Homogeneous
\ \ Operation
\ \
\ \
N x
X \
"• x. ^
\\
-
v X
yx^/-y^^V ^ ^ Xx
— -^^^/^fc^ V^-
C? ^4^^^^ ^
—L^Qj
— ^ \r
r-jf' ^\
^^/^
" oT
\-S
9si
— O 92°ATDC
A 22°ATDC
O 2°ATDC
S7 8°BTDC
^7 18°BTDG
O 38°BTDC
£S 88°BTDC
i i t i t i i
.8 1.0 1.2 1.4














' N.
^ ^x





^C
1.39
1.42
1.43
1.39
1.43
1.40
1.41
i
1.
Figure 43
Overall Equivalence Ratio


 Corrected Indicated Enthalpy Efficiency
 versus Overall Equivalence Ratio for
 Air Injection Operation With a
 Snail Diameter Nozzle
                    157

-------
30
1: 20
E
0)
1
w
f-r^
TJ
DO
cd
V
a 10
0
1

/~~ " "^ / x'' . / • ••'
/' Homogeneous Case 0 = 1 /'
AA, o 0
' ° O 03 *
^HA °
0 ^0
••^••K




—
i i i ! i i i 1 i i i iii _l — i —
20 80 " 40 0 40
BTDC TDC ATDC
    Start of Air Injection - Crank Angle Degrees
Figure
Measured Indicated Enthalpy-Efficiency
versus Start of Air Injection for Stoi-
cniometric Equivalence Ratio With a
Small Diameter Nozzle
                     158

-------
timing.  Spark timing of 30° BTDC and *4-0° BTDC have greater
efficiency than the two points at 20° BTDC.  The four
points corresponding to air injection starting at 8  BTDC
have a spread that can not be explained entirely by spark
timing.  The highest and lowest efficiency points both
have a spark timing of 10° BTDC.  The difference between
the two points is  due to the carbureted equivalence
ratio.  The higher efficiency point has the leaner car-
bureted equivalence ratio.  It is reasonable to expect
that leaner carbureted equivalence ratios would result
in greater efficiencies.
     The measured indicated enthalpy efficiencies are
quite low for air injection during the combustion pro-
cess.  This result is consistent with the high CO and
hydrocarbons for the same injection timing.  If the in-
jection of air disturbs  the combustion process and cause
incomplete combustion less energy will be available to
do work.
     7.  Engine Power for Small Diameter Nozzle
     The measured indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP)
will be used as a measure of  the specific power  of the
engine.  Presented in Figure  ^5  is a plot  of IMEP versus
overall equivalence ratio for homogeneous  operation.
The IMEP is nearly constant in the rich region and de-
creases in the lean region with  leaner  operation.  The
                           159

-------
•H
ro
    150
    1*4-0
3
M
0)
0)
fc
a,
130
o
a>
«M
«H
w


rt
a>
H

T3
0)
-P
at
o
•H
    120
110
    100
      90
               J.
                        J_
    .7"   .8   .9   1.0  1.1  1.2   1.3   l

               Overall Equivalence Ratio
                                                 1.5  1-6
       Figure
                Indicated Mean Effective Pressure
                versus Overall Equivalence Ratio
                for Homogeneous  Operation
                          160

-------
homogeneous data represents a band of results mainly be-
cause of the difficulty in setting the MET spark timing"and
the fluctuations in the dynamometer torque reading.
     Presented in Figure 46 is the typical set of air
injection data versus the overall equivalence ratio.  The
measured IMEP is seen to increase with leaner overall
equivalence ratios.  This trend reflects the increasing
amount of injected air.  In a sense the injected air
supercharges the engine.  The influence of the timing
of air injection is given in Figure 4?.  A minimum in
the measured IMEP occurs near top dead center when the
air is being injected during combustion.  The air in-
jection apparently disturbs the combustion process causing
incomplete combustion with reduced power.
     When the IMEP is corrected by subtracting the esti-
mated work required to compress the injected air the
magnitude of the corrected IMEP is equal to or less than
the corresponding homogeneous operation.  Air injection
before combustion results in the largest corrected IMEP.
     8.  Start of Air Injection at 128° BTDC
     The results obtained with air injection starting
at 128° BTDC will be presented separately because they
deviate from the pattern of the other data.  By referring
to Table II it is possible to compare the result of the
128° BTDC air injection timing with the result of other

                           161

-------
    150
                                         e
                                          31
    140  -
O 92°ATDG  1.39
A 22°ATDC  1.42

O
                      2°ATDC
    130
CD
ft
a,
*   120
01
«J
0)
    110
                                   Q  38°BTDG   1.40
                                       Homogeneous
                                         Operation
    100
     90
              I     I
                          i	I
             .8        1.0       1.2       1.4

                  Overall Equivalence Ratio
                                   1.6
     Figure  46
Measured Indicated Enthalpy Efficiency
Versus Start of Air Injection for Over-
all Stoichiometric Equivalence Ratio
With a Small Diameter Nozzle
                        162

-------
i!?u
140
130
•H
CO
P<
6 120
55
H- i
0)
CO
2 no
as
100
90
A
o O
A A
o 9
O<> °

S§
, 	 C\
	 	 7 	 7^ — 7 	 7" / ^2 W ' / /
Homogeneous Case  = 1 \/ / /
ill i I i i i f | i i i J —
>0 80 40 0 40
BTDC TDC ATDC
    Start of Air Injection - Crank Angle Degrees
Figure
Measured Indicated Mean Effective
Pressure Versus Start of Air In-
jection for Overall Stoichiometric
Equivalence Ratio With a Small
Diameter Nozzle
                    163

-------
early air injection timings.  The 128° BTDC air injection
timing has less nitrogen oxide emissions, greater carbon
monoxide emissions, greater hydrocarbon emissions and
lower efficiency.  Knock was also observed for the 128
BTDC air injection timing and not in the other air in-
jection timings.
     A second set of data was obtained at the 128° BTDC
air injection timing with the nozzle rotated 90  so that
the air jet is directed down into the cylinder and at an
angle of ^5° to the cylinder center line.  For the ro-
tated air jet, the nitrogen  oxide, carbon monoxide and
hydrocarbon emissions approach the values of other early
air injection.  The pressure trace indicates knock,
which accounts for the low  efficiency.
     The probable reason for the difference in the re-
sults is that when the air  is injected  in the plane of
the piston surface a stratification results with air  on
top and rich fuel mixture below.  By  rotating the nozzle
down into the cylinder the  stratification  is prevented.
     The knock  for both cases is probably  due to the
extra compression  of the charge when  it is  injected
very early because of the large  cylinder volume at the
time of air  injection.
     9.   The Effect of Air  Injection  on Combustion
     One  interesting discovery was  the  effect  of  air

                            164

-------
injection on the combustion process.  The time interval
between the spark and peak pressure was reduced from about
*K) crank angle degrees for homogeneous operation to 15
crank angle degrees with early air injection.  As a re-
sult of the more rapid combustion,the MET spark timing
was changed from about 25° BTDC homogeneous operation to
about 6° BTDC.  Also the cycle to cycle peak pressure
variations were nearly eliminated.  Presented in Figure
W is a set of pressure versus time curves which show typical
homogeneous operation, air injection during combustion,
and air injection before combustion.  The marks  along
the bottom of the pressure trace  represent 10   crank
angle degree  increments with the  large  mark at top dead
center.
     The most probable explanation  for  the  rapid and
consistent  combustion  is that the turbulence  resulting
from air  injection causes  increased flame velocities.
Lancaster  et  al.  (19?6) have shown that  the  flame velocity
increases  with  greater turbulence in the combustion cham-
ber of spark ignition homogeneously  charged engines.  The
kinetic  energy  of the  injected air  is large because of
its high velocity.   Much of the kinetic energy will be
converted  to  random turbulent motion.   The influence of
the turbulence  can be  seen when the air is injected
during the combustion  process as shown in Figure ^8b.   A
                           165

-------
                  600
Figure 48a

Homogeneous
Operation
   sp
          BTDC
Figure 48b

Air Injection
During Comb.
       1.10

       V5
       2°BTDC
  6 . =
   31
  e
   sp
20°BTDC
Figure 48c

Air Injection
Before Comb.
  *o - 1.J7
  0  ~~ X • ™T 0
  6^= 38°BTDC
  e
   31
     i
   sp
8°BTDC
                •H
                CQ
                ft

                I

                0)

                3
                (O
                CO
                0)

                Ok
               •H
                CO
         I

         0)
                01
                CO
                0)
         CO
         p<
         I
         0)
(D
(^
a,
                  300
                    0
                  600
                       I  i i
                            TDG   ^4-0    80   120   160
                  300
                        I i  i
                                              120   160
                  600
                   300 _
                             TDC   40
                           Crank Angle
                                         80   120
                                       - degrees
                                             160
     Figure  48
                   Cylinder Pressure Versus Crank Angle
                   for Homogenous Operation, Air Injec-
                   tion During Combustion and Air In-
                   jection Before Combustion
                        166

-------
definite increase in the rate of combustion is observed
as a result of air injection.
     10.  Discussion of Results for Small Diameter Nozzle
     It is apparent that air injection after combustion
can reduce the nitrogen oxide and hydrocarbon emissions.
Carbon monoxide emissions are at essentially the same
level for either operation with air injection or homo-
geneously.  However, when the timing of air injection is
advanced nearer the combustion period to extract more
work, all the emissions increase and the efficiency de-
creases.  It seems very unlikely that the delayed mixing
concept will be able to limit emissions while operating with
homogeneous mixture efficiencies.  The measured efficiencies
are low with air injection because of the incomplete com-
bustion when the air is injected during combustion and
because of the increased heat transfer due to charge motion.
When the work required to compress the injected air is
charged against the cycle the efficiency is very low.
Likewise the corrected IMEP will also be low.
     The air injection before combustion resulted in very
rapid and consistent combustion.  Even with the desirable
combustion, the measured efficiency was less than a cor-
responding homogeneous operation probably because of the
additional heat transfer associated with the air injection
induced charge motion.
                           167

-------
                      REFERENCES





Adams, W. E., Marsee, F. J., Olree,  R. M. ,  and Hamiliton,



J. C. (1976), Emissions, Fuel Economy, and Durability of



Lean Burn Systems," SAE Paper 760227,  Automotive Engi-



neering Congress and Exposition, Detroit, Michigan,  Feb.



23-27, 1976.





ASTM  (1971), ASTM Manual for Rating Motor.  Diesel, and



Aviation Fuels. American Society for Testing and Materials



1916 Race St., Philadelphia, Pa. 19103, 1971-





Blumberg, P. and Kummer, J. T.  (1971), "Prediction of NO



Formation in Spark-Ignited Engines - An Analysis of



Methods of Control," Combustion Science and Technology,



1971, Vol. 4, pp.  73-95.





Blumberg, P. N. (1973), "Nitric Oxide Emissions From



Stratified Charge Engines:  Prediction and Control,"



Combustion Science and  Technology, 1973, Vol. 8, pp. 5-24.





Borman, G. L.  (1964), "Mathematical Simulation  of Internal



Combustion Engine  Processes and Performance Including



Comparisons  with Experimentation," Ph.D. Dissertation,



University  of Wisconsin,
 Cakir,  H.  (1974),  "Nitric  Oxide  Formation in Diesel En-



 gines," The Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Combus-



 tion Group, Vol.  188 46/74,  pp.  477-483.




                           168

-------
Chapman, A. J. and Walker,  W. F.  (1971) •  Introductory Gas


Dynamics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston,  Inc.,  New York,


1971-



Daniel, W. A. and Wentworth, J. T. (1962),  "Exhaust Gas


Hydrocarbons - Genesis and Exodus," SAE Paper *J-86B, SAE


National Automobile Week, March,  1962.



Davis,  G. C., Krieger, R. G. and Tacaczynski, R. J. ( 197*0 •

"Analysis of the Flow and Combustion Processes of a Three-

Valve  Stratified Charge Engine With a Small Prechamber,"


SAE Paper 7*4-1170,  International Stratified Charge Con-


ference, Troy, Michigan, Oct. 30-Nov. 1, 197^.



De Soete, G. G.  (197*0,  "Overall Kinetics of Nitric Oxide
                              /
Formation  in  Flames," First Joint Meeting of the Chemistry


and Pulverized Fuel Panels  of the International Flame Re-


search Foundation, October  3-^,
 El-Messiri, A.  I.  (1973),  "The Divided Combustion Chamber

 Concept and Design for Control of SI Engine Exhaust Air

 Pollution Emissions,"  Ph.D.  Dissertation, University of


 Wisconsin, 1973-



 Evers,  L. W.,  Myers, P.  S.  and Uyehara,  0. A.  (197*0 , "A

 Search for a Low Nitric Oxide Engine," SAE Paper 7^1172,

 International  Stratified Charge Engine Conference, Troy,

 Michigan, Oct.  30-Nov. 1,  197^-


                           169

-------
Fenimore, G.  P.  (1971),  "Formation of Nitric Oxide  in



Premixed Hydrocarbon Flames,"  Thirteenth Symposium  (Inter-



national) on Combustion,  pp.  373-380, The Combustion



Institute.





Heywood, J. B. and Keck,  J. C. (1973). "Formation of



Hydrocarbons and Oxides of Nitrogen in Automobile Engines,"



Environmental Science and Technology. Vol. 7, Number 6,



March 1973, pp.  216-223.





Huls, T. A. (1966), "Spark Ignition Engine Operation and



Design," Ph.D. Dissertation,  University of Wisconsin,



1966.





Ingham, M. (1976), Unpublished data provided by personal



communication.         *





Iverach, D., Kirov, N. Y. and Haynes, B. S.  (1973), "The



Formation  of Nitric Oxide in Fuel-Rich Flames," Combus-



tion Science and Technology, 1973t Vol. 8, pp. 159-164.





John, J. E. A.  (1975), "Lean Burning Engine  Concepts -



Emissions  and Economy," SAE Paper 750930, Automobile



Engineering and Manufacturing Meeting, Detroit, Michigan,



Oct. 13-17, 1975-





Kays, W. M. (1966), Convective Heat  and Mass Transfer,



McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York,  1966.
                           170

-------
Khan, I. M.,  Greeves, G. and Wang,  C.  H.  T.  (1973).



"Factors Affecting Smoke From Direct Injection Engines



and a Method of Calculation," SAE Paper 730169, Inter-



national Automotive Engineering Congress, Detroit,



Michigan, Jan. 8-12, 1973-





Lancaster, D. R., Krieger, R. B. and Lienesch, J.  H.



(1975).  "Measurement and Analysis of Engine Pressure



Data," SAE Paper 750026, Automotive Engineering Congress



and Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, Feb. 2*J»28, 1975-





Lancaster, D. R., Krieger, R. B., Sorenson, S. C.  and



Hull, W. L.  (1976),  "Effects of Turbulence on Spark



Ignition Engine Combustion," SAE Paper 760160, Automo-



tive Engineering Congress and Exposition, Detroit,



Michigan,  Feb. 23-27, 1976.





Lauck,  P., Uyehara,  0.  A. and Myers, P.  S. (1962), "An



Engineering  Evaluation  of Energy Conversion Devices,"



SAE  Paper  463A, Automotive Engineering Congress, Detroit,



Michigan,  Jan.  8-12,  1962.





Lavoie,  G. A., Heywood, J. B. and Keck,  J. C.  (1970),



 "Experimental and  Theoretical Study of Nitric  Oxide For-



mation in Internal Combustion Engines,"  Combustion



Science and  Technology, 1970, Vol.  1, pp.  313-326.
                           171

-------
Lavoie, G. A. and Blumberg,  P.  N.  (1973),  "Measurements



of NO Emissions From a Stratified  Charge Engine"   Com-



parison of Theory and Experiment," Combustion Science



and Technology, 1973, Vol.  8,  pp.  25-37.





Mabie, H. H., Osvirk, F,  W.  (1958),  Mechanics and Dynamics



of Machinery. John Wiley and Sons  Inc.,  New York, N.  Y.





Mitchell, E., Alperstein, M.,  Cobb,  J. M.  and Faist,



C. H.  (1972), "A Stratified Charge Multifuel Military



Engine - A Progress Report," SAE Paper 720051, Automo-



tive Engineering Congress,  Detroit,  Michigan, Jan. 10-14,



1972.





Monaghan, M. L., French,  C.  C.  J., and Freese, R. G.



(197*0, "A Study of the Diesel as  a Light-Duty Power



Plant," EPA 460/3-74-011, U. S. Environmental Agency,



Emission Control Technology Division, Ann Arbor,  Michigan,



48105, 1974.





Newhall, H. K. (1969), "Kinetics of Engine-Generated



Nitric Oxides and Carbon Monoxide,"  Twelfth Internation-



al Combustion Symposium,  August, 1969» PP- 603-613.





Newhall, H. K. and Shahed,  S.  M. (1971), "Kinetics of



Nitric Oxide Formation in High-Pressure Flames,"  Thir-



teenth Symposium (International) on Combustion, pp. 381-



390, The Combustion Institute.





                           172

-------
Nightingale, D. R. (1975), "A Fundamental Investigation

into the Problem of NO Formation in Diesel Engines,"

SAE Paper 75084-8, 1975 SAE Off -Highway Vehicle Meeting,

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, September 8-11, 1975-

Obert, E. F. (1968), Internal Combust ion^Enginejs , " Inter

national Textbook Company, Scranton, Pennsylvania, Third

edition, 1968.

Pischinger, R. and Cartellieri, W.  (1972), "Combustion

System Parameters and Their Effect Upon Diesel Engine

Exhaust Emissions," SAE Paper 720756, National Combined

Farm, Construction and Industrial Machinery and Power-

plant Meetings,  Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Sept. 11-1^, 1972.

Purins, E. A.  (1974-) , "Pre-Chamber Stratified Charge

Engine Combustion Studies," SAE Paper 7^1159, Inter-

national Stratified Charge Conference, Troy, Michigan,

Oct.  30-Nov. 1,
Rhee, K.  T.  (1976),  Unpublished data provided by per-

sonal communication.

Shahed, S. M.,  Chiu, W. S. and Yumlu, V. S.  (1973). "A

Preliminary  Model  for  the Formation of Nitric Oxide in

Direct  Injection Diesel Engines and Its Application in

Parametric Studies," SAE Paper 730083, International

Automotive Engineering Congress, Detroit, Mich., Jan. 8-

12,  1973-
                           173

-------
Tasuku Date, Shizuo Yagi,  Akira Ishizuya and Isao Fujii



(19?4), "Research and Development of the Honda GVCC



Engine," West Coast Meeting,  Anaheim,  Calif.,  August



12-16, 1974.





Turkish, C. M. (197^), "3 - Valve Stratified Charge



Engines:  Evolvement, Analysis and Progression," SAE



Paper 7^1163 i  International Stratified Charge Engine



Conference, Troy, Michigan, Oct. 30 - Nov. 11,
Tuteja, A. T. (1972), "The Formation of Nitric Oxide



in Diffusion Flames," Ph.D. Dissertation, University



of Wisconsin, 1972.





Weibe, I. (1956), "Halbempiriesche Formel fur die



Verbrennungsgeschwindigkeit," Moskau; Verlag der



Akademie der Wissenschaften der VdSSr.





Yasuo Sakai, Kazuya, Kunii, Saburo Tsutsumi and Yasuhiko



Nakagawa (197*4-), "Combustion Characteristics of the Torch



Ignited Engine," SAE Paper 7*4-1167, International Strati-



fied Charge Engine Conference, Troy, Michigan, Oct. 30-



Nov. 1, 197^.
                           174

-------
                    Appendix  A




       METHOD USED TO CALCULATE NITRIC  OXIDE





     The rate of formation of nitric  oxide  is  described




by the following set of equations.




Rate Constants:






#2 + 0 -> NO + N   ;  K   =  7  x 1013  exi



NO + N + N2 + 0   ;  Klb =  1.55  x  1013




02 + N -» NO + 0   J  K2f =  13.3  x  109T



NO +  0 - 02 + 2V   5  £9, =  3.2 x 109T  exp(-39,100/7?T)
Rate  Equations:








                                 [0] + X?-[02]
^^L»2J L^J   "lfc
               K2b[NO][0]
 or
                                         K2f[02][N]
                        B = Xl





 For the case of constant temperature,  pressure  and



 equivalence ratio, A and B are  constant.   The solution



 to this first order differential  with  constant  coeffi-




 cients is given below.





       [NO] 2 = f +  MO}!- f;  «-*'**-*'> ;  t = time
 *degrees  Kelvin




                           175

-------
This equation was used to predict the nitric oxide forma-



tion by evaluating A and B at an average value of tempera-



ture, pressure and equivalence ratio for a time step.
                           176

-------
                     APPENDIX B


              ONE SYSTEM COMPUTER MODEL


     The following set of equations can be written for


the one system model when it consists of two regions, re


actants and products as seen in Fig. Bl.


Conservation of Energy:
                      = - PVR

                  t\ n
Conservation of Mass:
                              mP
Conservation of Volume:
                     7=7  + v
                     VT    R    P
Ideal Gas Relationships:
                    PVp =
Also the  internal  energy,  its rate of change with the


temperature,  and the  gas constant for the reactants can
                           177

-------
be obtained from equations describing these properties



as functions of pressure, temperature, fuel equivalence



ratio, and exhaust gas recirculation.  The internal



energy of the products and the gas constant, their rates



of change with respect to pressure, temperature, and



equivalence ratio are obtained from equations describing



these properties as functions of pressure, temperature,



fuel and equivalence ratio.



     The two region equations can be solved for the



following rate equations.
                           178

-------
   Reactants
Temperature (TR~)
Mass (mfi)
Volume (^p)
Exhaust Gas Recirculation  (EGR~)
Internal Energy
Gas Constant
Enthalpy  (hR~)
   Products
 Temperature  (T )
 Mass  (m  )
       P
 Volume  (Vp)
 Internal Energy (w )
 Gas  Constant (fl )
 Enthalpy O )
    System
 Pressure (p)
 Fuel to Air Equivalence Ratio  (F)
 Volume  (7T or y^)
 Rate o£ Change o£ Volume  (Vy or yy)
 Fraction of the  system mass which  is  products  (a)
 Rate of combustion       (m  or a)

           Figure Al.  One System Thermodynamic Model
                      179

-------
a
o
                    r> s                              aT     "    oT

                                                                2y?T
                                "
                                     V                 rl  f TP
                                                  TP IF
                    where:                     _  P
                                                                              15

-------
     Main Computer Program:  The computer program uses
a modified Euler method to predict the temperature of the
reactants and the products.  The pressure at the new
point is determined from the temperatures at the new
point, the gas constants and the total specific volume
at the new point.

     Computer Program  Input:
NUR:      The number of different sets of engine operating
          conditions to be calculated.
TITLE:    A one  line title for  each set of operating con-
          ditions,  this could be the  run identification
          number.
P:        The initial  pressure  in psia.
PHE:      The equivalence  ratio of the charge.
TR:       The initial  temperature of  the reactants  in
          degrees  rankine.
EGR:      The fraction of  the  total mass which  is re-
          circulated exhaust  gas.
TOE:      The time of  expansion in  seconds.
XXA:       A shape factor of the Wiebe function describing
           expansion, see Figure 3.
 XXM:       A shape factor of the Wiebe function describing
           expansion, see Figure 3.
 TOC:       The time of combustion in seconds.
                           181

-------
XA:
XM:
Function
DELT(s):
Function
VOL(s):
Function
ALF(s) :
Subroutine
FENERG
Subroutine
EQFLT(  ):
Subroutine
NO  (  ) :


Subroutine
EQBM:
 Subroutine
 ENERGY:
The shape factor of the Weibe function de-

scribing combustion, see Figure 2.

A shape factor of the Weibe function de-

scribing combustion, see Figure 2.

This function assigns the magnitude of the

time step depending on the time (s) in the

expansion.

The volume function assigns a system volume

depending upon the time in the expansion.

It uses the Weibe function.

This function describes the mass  fraction

burnt by a Weibe function dependent on the

time in the expansion.

The FENERG subroutine is used to  calculate

the properties of the reactants.

This subroutine is used to calculate the

equilibrium flame temperature.

The NO subroutine is used to calculate the

nitric oxide  formed during a time step.

This subroutine calculates the equilibrium

concentrations of the various species  in

the products  of combustion.

The ENERGY subroutine determines  the pro-

perties  of the products  of combustion.   This

subroutine was developed  by  G. L. Borman

 (1964) and can be found  in his thesis.
                          182

-------
             FO^'ATP   T(«:.! HE., I "IN V4RIA^LF VOL'JMF C^.?tSTlC\  -  .-'AY 11*1973')
             nr'F SlO '  TIT|_=(2*)
             CG'1M "M/yi'/TCE, XXA> XX :/C
             'ATA C & T / 8 . / * r1 \ T / 1 ft . / > L ", T / 0 . / / F AP C / . 5 / 1 3» t V / 1 9 1 5 7 , / t ' >C F R / , / > K L U / I /
             C = . 1 ? 5
              R t T ' : ( ft ,(* 5 )
             -EA-i,'j"R
      1 5 •    i: F 1 n ( 5 * 3  E A D , P ^ P « E / T « ^ F ", A
                       ,X/.v                                                                         12

       c     r n '^ './/"•< \     "                                                                        1 ^

>•     4"'     en-»'.'AT('   EQ» I '/At b <~.f  Si T !'"'» ' t fr>,2> '  EX-iALST GAS  RFCwlMlG-. "AlE='                lo
oo           ^           F X P V '~ T  I" - " I  F = ' ,r E i 0 . . )/( ZZZ*32 ,+ZZZ*3 .7^*28 . 011)                       23
             CAI I  FQFl" T(T?^ ^, TK^P^E, Qi-V/ F£S.» FAPC* EG«> C AT* nAT/:.1AT }                               2^
             CALL FFN^RG ( P/ Ti?> PUF^Ji^ (,UTK^ RR* UHV* FAS, FAPC * tGR^C AT* ^i\T*ClaT)                     25

             ;G*-"nL('!>                                                                             27


             «L«0.                                     -                                               ^'
              F»0.                                                                                    31
             XN"P=0.                                                                                  3i
             J«l                                                                                      3^

-------
      CD T"  33
      nT«DE|_T(t
      S-S-OT
      ALL»AL
      AL«AIF
-------

12
13:
75
      OP •(-?*'•>* VOL
                                             P) } } / (
                                             -OuP  )

                                             -M* ( 3U
                                                                     +TP
i1=( { l .-A:
03 T '•  13"
CALL  fr'f^
                 -JP/ F
                                                 LT,» 'JUF/ 0«P*LRT* ?RF )
      ZP»(
      rP«(-P*OTVDL
      T p o s T P
      TALL
      ZP«(
                                                 *TP#DPT
     /(rOT+TP*tr^ r+Rp j
           )/(TVi,L-TF*DRP -ZP*< RP*TP/P-TP*D« P-I:.
nP*(R°*TP/P-TP*['Po  .QLip ))/(DUT +TP*DPT  +P.P)
     en
CALL NH(
*KLO)
IF< IFRR.
yF«wP + (PP>P)*(
i.v'RTTP(6*?5)S/X
F(]RMATC«ri5.5)
IF(S-TGP)60>5o^5n
FTA*?.l5£-6*XMp*P*(
                                                  IERR*NfJFR
                           50
                                ) /i' F
                                                                                   72

                                                                                   7-'*
                                                                                         9-
                                                                                         93
                                                                                         97
                                                                                        102
                                                                                        105

-------
            FO*V.AT(2*A3/5E14, 9/5614. 5/2E14. 5)                                               106
            srR!T*(6jft5>ETA                                                                   10?
            FarUiATC  NITRIC  OX I OEA T«K * ' / E 15 . 5// / J                                         103
            •^'UH* UP-1                                                                        109
            1FM 'R> 59* 59* l^c                                                                 U«-
            ST'IO                                                                             111
            PNr'                                                                              112
            FU^rrr.M OELT(S)                                                                 113
            II' f .sin-  B(y)                                                                   114
                      5)lj?*lO                                                               117
                      ^)2>3*?0                                                               ll'i
                      3)3,4/ 30                                                               119
H     V.     lF(S-1.9r-3U,5*.*0                                                               120
™     4"     IF'      T » I -f 1                                                                            1 2 '»
      •i      TsT + 1                                                                            12?
      4      I»T+1                                                                            125
      »      I«I*1                                                                            127
      ?      1*14-1                                                                            12-H
      1      TeT+1                                                                            ]2?
            "ELT-B(I)                                                                        13'
            '•'ETu-\                                                                           131
            t*r-                                                                              132

-------
             GO r  3o
             '/HI .at
00
FFfS-TOci10,20*2-.;
£LF= i .-^yp(-XA*( (S/T".C )**(
SI] T • 30
             J =
 133
 13*
 135
 13':
 137
 13-
 1 39
 U •
U2
143
14'+
145
1 4 s
147
143
149
150
151

-------
      1QAT)                                                                               153
       wFV«.3HV-19l»6, + ( ( ( <1.5737E-l!»*TR-5.433le-l2)*TR-4t50«2E-C8)*TR                  J54
      1 0. 62855-0* > *TR + 3 • *7'>5 t-OZ)*TR + 15. 79 l + l5St 07                                     155
                                                                       E-0*)                156
                                                                                           ^57
                                                                                           1 5t»
                                                                                           15;,
                                                                                           16
                                                                       06)                  J61
                                                                                           162
       ' 'JTA«( ( (-.l57r "-16* L'AT )                       171
      nATA  HHE/.2/                                                                        172
      CALL  FEr -CBt,f P^Tw./PHe^Uw.^rL'TR/Rt jCHV^FA5,FAPC/EGR/CM/HATjiJ  T )                    l'73
      TP»T^430"0.                                                                         175
11-   CALL  F"P^GY( ^,TP,PHr/^-\S/,(t / f- A^C/ XP/ 'xiP/ MT* )UF/ DKf>/ O^T, L kr )                     176
       ;pB"r> + wp*TP                                                                         177
      : H « HI - _ ^ P                                                                            1 7 ;<
*•'    IF f ATSO-)-[HE » 1 '/10/2 )                                                            17->
7     Tp«Tf^r).|/ ([-.nT + yp + DyT*T P )                                                           IH-")
       ,n  T   n •                                                                            m
1 '    CJ  TINJE                                                                            132
      •FT-j<-j                                                                              lh 3

-------
            CO •'•'•< A'/R! -?C/C  ,^  , :   >*•   *T >*    *XH*XG>XN>XH2*Xl>ljXCU,X. U*XL2j               187
                                                                                                  "
            •'ATA V/l.
            X N ". C r- = X N.n
            OCAT                                                                               lql

             ^S-IAT                                                                               193
            F.pHe                                                                               l9;


                      7  *                                                                        197
oo           « sK L
^           CALL
            fF( T.NC-."-)  G!"J Tn 99
            A2»X !?*X'.*13.3F.9*TEE*EXP<-7080./                            215
      10    CONTINUE                                                                            21*
            RPT'!5M                                                                              217

-------
vo
o
     C
     c
     C
     c
      c
      c
      c
      c
      c
      c
      c
      c
 C'IERI/,M  OLlKAF.A
.-I r,cnns in/  MAnisnf;
            SUnROUTIt-E
DfcvELUPEl* BY
UNIVERSITY H
        /f-l.nc/
XlpXl?
Ol-'.E.iSI
[)ATA  jF/r/

** SECTIf'N 100 CALCl'lATES TMH  CnilSTAflTS 'iSRC

R0»(
K*i^O
t.l«RO*3.73H37
                                       VgRSICM    MCV 1972
                                                  !  T'K f,U^n!ITi;u:
IH(K,GT.C.J>*AN) .VI  T   11
I E i- • R « 1
&u TD  7jf
        11C
            ij2n2.0*R/A|;
        11?
                        115*112,115
    EQi-ILIEPlUf-: f 'VjS'Af.'T!: '.TT.E  C'-IRVE FITTED  (LFAST SQUARTS)  IM
    E  ^OC  Tf- 3«cn  DE^.  K (1440 TP  6«4^ DEG R)  FPTll DATA  I'l  JAi|/.
         FM!CAL TA3LFr-  SECl'lp EpITlDN ( 197C ^  .
   EQBM
   EQDM
   EQBM
   EQBM
   EQBM
   EQBi'i
   EQbH
   EQCf,
   EQBM
   EQliM
   EQBM
   F.QBI;
   EQDM
   EQbH
   EQBM
   EQE^M
   rQBf'.
   tQBK
   EQlif-i
   £ Q P!-'
  . EQl.I1

   EQuM
   EQP.K.
   EQBM
   EQBM
   EQBM
THEE
                                                                        EQBM
                                                                        EQBM
                                                                        EQBM
                                                                        EQBM
                                                                        EQt.r,
                                                                        EQDM
 1
 2
 3
 4
 5
 6
 7
 n
 9
10
11
12
13

15

17
                                                                             2"
                                                                             21
                                                                             2?
                                                                             23

                                                                             25
                                                                             26
                                                                             27
                                                                             Z*
                                                                             31
                                                                             3?,
                                                                             33

-------
                                                                            EQBM 35
                                                                            EQBI'i 3*

     J>0.448fj3'?E-?*TAS"») ?/"OP                                              EQBM 3"

                          5/-.CP                                              EQBi; 40

                          )/rCP                 '    "                         EQBM 4?.

                                                                            EQBH 44
                                               ^C.£.->3 1.23-0. i54C33E-l-TA   EQBH 45
                                                                            EQBM 4*
                                               2.611'U+C ,254^B9*TA         EQBM 47
     9-0.l6l547E-l*TAS'j) )*".QP                                              EQBM 4*

     i - 0 . ! 2 3 6 9 3 E -1 * T A S> ">) ! * r, ^ p                                              c Q B M 5 f>
C                                                                           EQBM 51
C     **  StCTlCM ?<0 D'-CTf-rS AETHER nF, NHT  Tfi ^ Ak r  A  iJEW ESTlMATb       EQBM 52
C     (-H  X^*X6JX« AiNu 'Ul.                                                 EQBM 53
C                                                                           EQBM 54
      jF(KLfi-l) ?o^?0'v^l                                                 HQBM 5.«i
  20f> 1 f; t JF.F.tf.O) CO TM ^0-                                                EQBM 56
      j h ( Pi.iI-Pv. I PI; ) :??^/ ^1^^305                                            EQUH 57
  210 IF{ AHS(T/TP;-1.0) .GT.0.2)  r,H  TO 305                                 EQBM 5P
      1^ {AK$(P/PPK-1.G) ,r,T.C.2J  GO  Til 305                                 EQBM 59
      GO  in  uU                                                            EQBM 6>>
C                                                                           EQBH 61
C     **  SECTICN 3fO C.\"  r.'.K.T  AM  INITIAL ESTIMATE  f?F X4/X6/X8 AHD XU,   EQBM 62
C                                                                           EQBM 63
  305 iFfPHI.GT.l.e) C'? TC 310             .                                EQBM 64
      pA.^ = i,C/{R + Ai-K2 + ''''.2"*AH)                                            EQBM 65
      r,Q  TC  315-                                                            EQBM 66
  31C pA-sl.i:/(iU + *2 + A" + 0.r;*AM)                                            EQBM 67
  315 FU--U2.0»Av*ClO                                                      EQBM 6*
                                                                            EQBM 6
-------
N)
         320
             QX*1.0
       c
       c
       c
       c
             FOx«(FUNl*SQCJX*A'l)/,LF.l. iF-2)  f.n TD 330
             JN isjNu + 1
             lFrnp,LF.2'J) OP  TT  T2"7
             SQ ;X«SORT(nX)
                                      IX)
X8.UX
Xll«Rl*PAR

** SECTK.N <*oo CALCI.-I.A-ES  TME ELEMENTS OF TK  MATRIX  OF
EUjATIL'NS,
             T 7 M a 0 •
                                                                    EQBM  70
                                                                    EQBM  71
                                                                    EQBM  72
                                                                    EQBM  73
                                                                    EQBM  74
                                                                    EQBM  75
                                                                    EQBM  7/»
                                                                    EQBM  77
                                                                    EQBM  7P
                                                                    EQBM  7<>
                                                                    EQhM  80
                                                                    EQBH  81
                                                                    EQBH  82
                                                                    EQBM  8*
                                                                    EQL.fi  84
                                                                    EQW'I 87
                                                                    EQHM 8»l
                                                                    EQBM 8<»
                                                                    EQhM 9o
                                                                    EQBM 91
                                                                    EQBM 9?
                                                                                 EQbM
                                                                                 EQbK
     EQBM  97
~ISEDEQbM  9b
     EQftl*  9"
     EQBM100
     EQBH101
     EQBM02
     EQBM103
     EQpl',104

-------
vo
U)
       •»55  CU T Js ,{.;

           5 0 X 4 « i ; & T ( X
           50,V                                                          EQBM135
                                                                                EQBM136
                                          l.(HT106)                             EQBK137

-------
vo
C
C
C
C
    A<3/1)*0.0
    AO/2)»T76-D3*(1.0+T106)
    A<3/3)*T78-P3*T108
    A (  • 1 .0+T7&+T l'">6+';4* < i . 0+T 106 )
             8(4)
    ** SECTK-N  500 S'lLVET, "HH MATRIX
    jSlNG MAXI^uv.  PT/nr rPiNT STp,ATEOY.
             DO  505  K»l,3
    IF(8IG.GE.1.C'E-J'M G" TC 5?^
    JBIG«K
    DO 510  I-KP1/4
    lF(APS{A(I/K))tLr,bI-J ^ TH 510
510 CU .TINuE
    IF(BIG.GF.1.0E-1TO  G ' TO 512
    ItKR*3
    &U TO 710
512 iF(lBjG.E3.K)  GO Tn ^-20
    DU 515  J«K^4
    Tfc;-.P.A(K,j)
    A(K.» J)«A( I?IO/ J)
         515 CU "
                                                                                   EQBM140
                                                                                  'EQBKUl
                                                                                   EQEMH?.
                                                                                   EQBK143
                                                                                   EQBM144
                                                                                   EQBM145
                                                             CAI.SSIA'1 ELlMINATinf;
                                                                                   EGBf',132
                                                                                   EQ&M5?
                                                                                   EQB?-:15-J
                                                                                   I.QF,i,l59
                                                                                   £QBMl6i»
                                                                                   [".Qt>!;l6l
                                                                                   EQt.f.162
                                                                                   FQfiMl63
                                                                                   EQBM165
                                                                                   EQB'!l6fi
                                                                                   EQUH167
                                                                                   EQF.M6
                                                                                  EQHIU71
                                                                                  EQF»!-!17?,

-------
             T6-.P»B«B(IBIG)                                                         EQBf',176
             R( lBlG)=T£v'p                                                         EQBi:177
        !>20  00  525  I*KPl>4
             nU  530
             A I ! * 0 )*A( I, j )-A('> j )*T"R;l                                          EQbHiai.
        530  CU"TINuE                                                            EQBM182
             R( ! )*8< I )-B(K)*rrK!|                                                EQBM183
        525  CJ :T'lN'v)E                                                            EQbHl84
        505  c°''TlNUE                                                            EQBM18.3
             IK A3S;(AbS(Sl/X4  ) ,GT.i..-E-5) 'ICK.1                                    .EQBM199
                                                                                EQBK200
                          ),CT,l.:-'E-3) MCK-l                                    EQBM201
                                                                                EQBK20?.
            IF(A8S(S3/X8  ).GT.l.nE-5) MCK.l                                    EQBM203
                                                                                EQ8H204
                                       'ICK*1                                    EQBM205
            IF((X4tGT.OiO),At!D.(X8.CT,0.0).AMO.
-------
              IF (INC.IT.25) GO  Ttl  r.22                                             EQhH2lo
              GO  TO 710                                                            EQBM212
         622  lNn*IND+l                                                            EQHK213
              GO  TD 455                                                            EQBH214
         625  lF(X6.GE,0.fl) GLJ  Tfi  T?                                             EQBM213
              GO  TD 71C                                                            EQBI',217
       C           •                                                                EQ£!i2n
       C      **  SECTION 700 CALCl'LA'FS TUf. f1PLrRACTI H! ,5 /i',;D PETUR'lS  WITH KRR«OEQk.M21'>
       C      TO  THE  CALLING Pm&F \." nr. IF Afl ANSWER  "ASNCT rFTAINfO  RETURN1".    F.Qfif.ZZO
       C      wlTH IERR»(T^E ERPnP  CPDD                                          EQI.M221
       C
         70?  IE«R-0
              jF.l                                                                 EQF>!:224
              PHiPK*PHIf
H             TPi «T
«             PP; =P
                   SCRT(X4)                                                        EQbM22it
                                                                                   EQbh231
              X2«C2*5QX8                                                           EQBM232
              X3»C3*SOXU                                                          EQBN233
                                                                                   EQDM23?
                                                                                   fIQE!,23'>
                                                                                   EQr>'-:237
                                                                                   EQF.I',23"
         715  X"7
              GO  TQ 72?
         720  X7.A!iOH*Xl3                                                          EGLK242
         725  KfcTUKN                                                               PQKl'24:)
         7in  jFB0                                                                  cQt!-i24<«
              RfeTJRN                                                               EQhf!24S

-------
                      APPENDIX  C


               TWO  SYSTEM  COMPUTER MODEL


     The  following set  of equations  can  be written  for


 the  two system model  having  three regions, lean reactants,

 rich reactants and combined  products as  seen  in Fig.  Cl.




Conservation of Energy:
                mLRULR = ~ PVLR ~ hLRmLP
                mRRURR = ~ PVRR
                mpup = - pVp



Conservation of Mass:
                mT =
Conservation  of Volume:
                 VT *  VLR  +  VRR  +  VP
 Ideal  Gas  Relationships:




                 PVLR = mLRRLRTLR
                      = mRRRRRTRR
                 pV  = m R T
                   P    P P P
                           197

-------
                                     RICH REACTANTS
                       PRODUCTS
             Temperature
             Mass
             Volume
             Internal Energy (u,,)
             Gas  Constant (Kp)
             Enthalpy (hp)
             Fuel to Air Equivalence Ratio (F' )
LEAN REACTANTS
Temperature  C?LR)
Mass (m   or &,)
       LK     L
Volume (VrD or y  )
         •"•"     LR
Exhaust Gas Recirculation
Fuel to Air Equivalence Ratio  of
  The Recirculated Exhaust Gas  (F,
Internal Energy  (HLR)
Enthalpy
Fuel to Air equivalence Ratio  of
  the Fuel and Air (FT)
                        SYSTEM
Pressure((p)
Volume (V~ or v~)
         j.     j.           •      •
Rate of Change of Volume  (V-  or  v  )
                     •      J.     JL
Rate of Combustion  (m^ or  b. )
Fraction of the System which  is  Product  Co,  ;
Fraction of the System which  is  Lean  Reactants  ($
Fraction of the System which  is  Rich  Reactants  ($
                       Figure Cl
   Two System Thermodynamic Model With Three Regions
                          198

-------
The internal energies and gas constants will be handled



as discussed in the one system model.



     The rate equations for the two system model having



three regions are as follows.
                           199

-------
p =
                                           V
 3u
( — ^
1
                             R
                             *
            F
                                   (Tp Tf~ + Rp)
                                        Rp)
      VT '
                   LR
                                RR
         - a
                         R  T
  m  	*~ »
  TP  ap  +
                                         P 3T
                                  V
                          *RRTRR
                           200

-------
TP "
                             4- T   	*- + R
                             * JP  821     P
Where:

-------
     Main Computer Program:  The two system model consist
of a main program and eight subprograms.  The main pro-
gram keeps track of combustion, expansion, and mixing
processes;  It also handles the program input and out-
puts.  The subprograms are called as needed to perform
their specialized tasks.  Listed below are the input
terms as an aid to understanding the program:

Computer Program Inputs:
NUR:

TITLE:

TCM:

GAM:

CL:

THDO:

RPM:
C:

XLR:
The number of different sets of engine
operating conditions to be calculated.
A one line title for each set of calcula-
tions, such as run number.
The time of combination of the two product
systems (seconds).
The initial fraction of the mass in the
lean system.
The time between the initiation of combus-
tion of the two systems (seconds).
Crank angle at which combustion and the
computer program begins (degrees).
The engine speed  (revolutions per minute).
Clearance volume divided  by the displaced
volume.
The length of the  connecting rod divided by
the radius of the  crank shaft.
                           202

-------
TOCL:

TOCR:

XML:

XMR:

XAL:

XAR:

PL:
PR:
FL:
FR:
TLR:

TRR:

EGRL:

EGRR:

PEL:
Time of combustion for the lean system
(seconds).
Time of combustion for the rich system
(seconds).
Shape parameter "m" of the combustion func-
tion for the lean system.
Shape parameter "m" of the combustion func-
tion for the rich system.
Shape parameter "a" of the combustion func-
tion for the lean system.
Shape parameter "a" of the combustion func-
tion for the rich system.
Initial pressure of the  lean  system  (psia).
Initial pressure of the  rich  system  (psia).
Equivalence ratio of  the lean system.
Equivalence ratio of  the rich system.
Initial  temperature of the  lean  system  re-
actants  (degrees Rankine).
Initial  temperature of the  rich  system  re-
actants  (degrees Rankine).
Mass  fraction  of recirculated exhaust gases
in the  lean  system.
Mass  fraction  of recirculated exhaust gases
in the  rich  system.
The equivalence ratio of the  recirculated
exhaust  gases  in  the  lean system.
                           203

-------
 PER:
 Subroutine
 RPT  (   ):
Subroutine
(PRDMIX( ):
Subroutine
PRESEQ ( ):
Subroutine
EQFLT (  ):
The equivalence ratio of the recirculated

exhaust gases in the rich system.

The RPT subroutine is used to calculate the

reactant to products process for a time

step.  This subroutine is capable of handling

two regions of reactants and one region of

products.  The output of RPT is the new

properties at the end of the time step.

By setting the fraction of one of the re-

actant regions to zero the subroutine will

handle two regions,  one product region and

one  reactant region.

The  PRDMIX subroutine is used at the time

of combination when  the two product regions

are  combined into a  single one.  This sub-

routine determines the properties of the

combined product  region.

After the products are combined  the pres-

sures in the two  reactant regions and the

combined product  region are probable dif-

ferent.  PRESEQ subroutine adjust the

volumes of each region until they all have

the  same pressures.   The  regions  expand  or

contract isentropically.

EQFLT is used  to  calculate the  equilibrium

flame temperature.
                           204

-------
Subroutine
NO (  ):
Subroutine
PRD (  ):
Subroutine
RENERG  C )
Function
BELT  ( ):
Subroutine
EQBM:
 Subroutine
 ENERGY:
        The NO subroutine is used to calculate the

        nitric oxide formed during a time step.

        The PRD  subroutine calculates the change

        in properties  for a time step when com-

        bustion  is  completed and only products re-

        main.

        This  subroutine  calculates the properties

        of the reactants.

        This  function  assigns  the magnitude  of the

        time  step depending  on the time  in the ex-

        pansion.

        The EQBM subroutine  calculates  the equili-

        brium concentration  of the various species

         in  the products  of combustion.   EQBM is

         shown in Appendix B.   This  subroutine was

         developed by Cherian Olikara.

         The  ENERGY subroutine determines the pro-

         perties  of the products of combustion.

         This  subroutine was developed by G.  L.

         Borman  (1964)  and can be found in his

         thesis.

The computer program follows.
                            205

-------
      DIMENSION TIHE(24)
      DATA CAT/8./ jHAT/i 6t //OAT/0. /*FAPC/»3//QM/l9l37.//NnFR/0//K|.0/ 1/
45    FORMATC    STRATIFIED CHARGE  ENGINE  SIMULATION - JAM E2jl97V/)
      WRITE (6/45)
      ftEAD,NUR
150   READ(5,35)TITLE
      *RtT-E(6,35>TlT|.E
35    PQHMAT(24A3)
      READ, TQM, GAM, Cl
      READ, TOCl, XML, XAL
15    pa«MAT(«  .RPM«I,FB.O, '    TI'ME  WHEN MIXING     ,
     l«  CUMBUSTION LAG*',R12.5, '  MASS  FRACTIDN  CF LEAN«',F3.3)
25    FORMAT{ i LEAN-EQ''IV F.ATI H« ' , FS , 2, '   EXHAUST GAS fiEClR*1 ,P5.3/
     p  EXHAUST G^S EQl'IV RATJHa ', F5.E,
     2i   COMBUSTION - TIMr«'/E10.4, '    XML*1  ,FA.l,'  XAL-'fF*,!)
85    FOUMATC RICH-EQ'.'IV "ATin« ' ,F5 .2, '   EXHAUST GAS F;EC ZR- ' ,F5.3,
     li  EXHAU«,T GAS Ent'Iv RATIO*1, F5. 2,
     2'   CDMBuSTK'N - yIMP* ' , ^10.4, '    XMP.
      wKiTE(6,55>
55    FORMAT!'    TIME          CRANK  ANGLE        VOLLME    NQ-PPM
     1 TFMP PROD  PnE n*r>   TEf'.P  REACT     PRESSLRE     FRACTION BURNED
     2
27    ZZ
      THFsTHD*. 017453
      If-(THE>lb,l7,l6

-------
        17    VG.C
              GU Tu  18
        16    VG «C+.5*COS(TrtE)/2.+XLR*(l.-SQRT
-------
                          00  TO  400
            S«S+OT
                      017453
                   ,5-COS(THE5/2.+XlR***2
             TLPP.UP
             GU  TO  (215
      213    ALiSS»AlL$
                             )  IL»2
g           CALL  RTP31*>275.»3 >0 5 / JJ
       275    jj«2
             GO  TD  202

-------
         2Q3   IF J/2.
               pRRsPR
               TR?P»
               GO  TO
                                                     .^^
                          EGRRjFp^*TI-.'RR/DTVR/FAS/FAPc*QHV/Fr'WT/CT)
               GO TQ  335

-------
        311    ALRS.l,
              AtRSSai,
              RMflR«0.
              TRR«0.
              IR.3
        310    CALL PRD(PR,TRP,FRP,r>TyR,TVRp,,FAS,FAPC/DT>
        335    xNoPRR-XNOPR
              IF(FRP LT.l £-6) GO TO 342
              CALL NQR/TRPP/TRP/FRP/ALPSS,ALRS*OT/CAT/HAT*QAT
              lF(IERR,Ng,0) GO TO 50
        342
        301    rfR!TE
              CO TO
        3Q3    I»-(S-ABS(
10       304    JJ«3
g             G° T0 200
        3.Q5    PspR
              FP.FRP
              TP»TRP
               F.O.
              CCl'CCCL
              vGn=vG
              TVDL»GAM*VDLS+(l.«-GA':)*vnRS
              VO.TVDL
              GO TQ 401
        400   C^lL
        4Q5   CALL PRESeC

j^EGRR/FEP^ VGn=VG


-------
      ALP»ALl,S*GA'"UALRS*U.-r,AM)
                +(l.-GA'M* 'Fp.
75    FURMAT(«  THE  PfmuCTS  ARE  MIXED AT THIS
      OU TO
402   orsDE
      VG «C*.5-COS(THE)/2.+XLR*(l.-SQRT(l.-( (SlMfHE ) /XLR.'**2
      TVnLL»TVCL
      GO TO  U42
      ALLSS»ALLS
      IF-(S-CCL.G(=,TQCL)  11*2
450   GO TO  (452/455/455)^ TR
452   ALRSS
                         IR=2
455   ALoPsALP
      ALo«ALLS*GAM*ALRS*(l.-GAM)
      FPP*FP
      FPAAs (FLP*ALLS*GAH/{l.*FLP*FAS)*FRP*ALRS*(l.-GAH)/Ut*FRP*f:AS))
     I/ALP
      FP«FPAA/(1.-FA5*FPAA)
                  /2.
                  /DT

-------
              CAt.1
             l,F
        420   GO
              ALtSS-1,
              RMRL«0.
              TLftsO.
              1L.3
        412   GU TO  (417/413, 4'17),
              ALt>SS«lf
              TRR=0.
              1R.3
        417   lF(lU-3
M       48"   1H(IR-3)'435*481/481
10       481   ILa4
              AFP=FP
              ALPP-1.0
              00 TO 435
        410   CALL P*D(P/Tp ,FP/nTvCL/TVnLL>FASjFAPC/PT)
             INOpR/KLD)
              JF( IERR.N:E.n> GQ TO  50
        401   WR!TE
              GU TO
        95
        80     |HTHD"l
        50     CONTINUE
               CALL  ENERCY(P*TP*FP/FAS/!'P/FAPC/RP/DUP/OUT/C')F/CF.P/DRT/DRF)

-------
               UR«GAM*ULRB+( 1 ,-" AM > *URRP.
               'JB.UP-UR + WF
               VB.VPF-VPF
               rtR I TE ( 6/ 1 05 > Up/ UP./ Wp , UB
         105    FORMATC    ENERGY BAI.AMCE -  UP«'^E12.5/»    UR««/E12,5/
              l«     WGRK««,E12.5,,»     S'JM»'/E12.5)
H              >jRlTE(6/106)vPF/yRF/\'B
w        106    FORMATC    SPECIFIC   /aiUME BALANCE AT fMAL  COriClTIdMS-   VP«f
               •«RlT£(6, IQTNC,^, , fK. „.,., ,
         io7    FO«HATC    PERFQK.-IANCE PARAMETERS -   ESTIMATED  COMPRESSION WDRK-'
              l*Ei2,5/«    ENTHALPY f-Ff-l EI EMCY« ' > E12.5/      	    "" "  "
              Z'     ISNO«'*Ei2.5//)
               FDRMAT(5E14,5>
               I»-(NURJ59, 59/150
         59     STrjP
               END
               SUBROUTINE  RTP(P ,GA'i /TLR/TRR,TP*FL^FR'FpP'DFP/ ALLSS/ALRSS/RHBL
               JF(GAM,LE,1,E"»4)  FFL»0,
               IF{GAM.GE. .9999)  FFR=0.
               CALL  ENERGY (P^TP^FPP, FAS, UP, FAPC/RP/DUP, OUT, DUF,DRP/DRT,DRF)

-------
      CALL RENER0(p/TRR/rR/Er>Kr>/FErs/URR,DUTRR,RPR,QHv/FA5/FApC/FMWT>
      ALP«ALl.S5*CAh+ALRSS*(l.-'5AM)
      ZURlR*TlR/ )
      ZR»RRR*THR/(r*(D'lTRF;4-PpR) 5
          l.~AUSS)*GA':*P.U
                      l.-GA :.)*RP,R
                                          1 t-GAM)* (PkR*TKR-RP*TP)-P*DTVOL
                         np! -HUD

                                ( l.-GAf:)*(HF.R-HF
10     [V?
      GO TO 30
JO     D"f>=F' ) /F
IQ     TR«R*TRR
      TL*R«TLR
      t)I».RR*DTFR
      i/l L«R*r>Tl.R
      [)TPP»DTP
      TL?*TLR*PTLR*OT
      TP«TP*DTP»DT

-------
 TV ,L =
 P*( <1.-ALLS)*GAM*RLR*TLR+<1.-ALRS")*{1.-GAM*F.PR*TRR*AIP*RP*TP)/
ITV.--L
 CALL ENERGY P.PjDi.^,0!JT,CUF,CKP,ORT,DRF)
 ZRsRRR*TPR/
 AAai ( TP*DRT +
 RLa(l,*ALLS
 BR«(l.-ALRS)*( l.-
 C*t*NIBL*GAM*(nLK-!lP)*j MBR*( 1 .-GAM ) * ( HRR-HP )

                                  ) / ( G-ZL*Bl-ZF.*«P-0*AAj
 TPafPP*( DTP + DTPP  )*DT/?..
 P-( (l.-AlLS)*GAM*RLR*TLR-»-(l.-ALRS)*(l.-GAK)*f;RR*TRR*ALP*RP*TP)/
IT VOL
 RETURN
 SU9ROUTINE
 GAr;#FAS*FA
 CALL ENERGY < PL, TLP>Fl.P, FAS jiJLP/FAPC/RLP* DIP, OUT, DUFjORP/ORTjORF)

-------
                                     P/ FAS/Up,P> FAPC'RRP/ t>LP/DUT/
                                                                    J
               BR«ALRS*< i. -CAM) /ALP
               vP«Bi.*K[.p*TLP>rL*  FL /TP.P/pR/pR /ECRL/FEL
               /eo^K/FEP^ALLb^ALf'f,, -,A'V<,TVnL,FAS/FAPC/QHV/ FM'T)
               CALL  E:iEf.CY(PS/Ti1S/Fn^rAS/l!Pp>^FAnc^P-P  / O'JF^C! 'T, COF/ D»;P/ DRT/ OKr )

-------
                                    ,-f,A '
               TUS-TLR
               TK'iSaTkR
NJ              D - " S
_i              r ~ K -S
               TL:.aTLi-.S*( (^^KLRr./rri.*rL" ) )#*( (XKL-1. ) /X.r.U )
               TR«STRP.5*( (P*K>-<':  /( rP.^RF,^.) )**( (XKR-l. )/XKR)
               CALL  REMFRCd1  /T!.p,Fi ^G~lj F Ll; ' UR> D< 'TI.R, P I,P, QI!W FAS,
               CAl.L  PENFRGtt'  /Trr^F' ^ W.j FrR/UF-.^^ DMTFR.^PRP.. CMV/PAS, FAPC/
               ER.' '.•/«CL*L!LR-»-CR*U" p-!r A
               P-PS-10.
        30     TL--' = TLRS*( (P*RL»"/ ( r..*P Lr ) }**( (XKL-1. ) /Xf.L ) )
               TRp.*TRRS+( (t;***3.Pr>  /('•PrtBr1' ) )**( (XKR-l. J/XKR) /
               TPs ( P*TVOL-CL*^ L' ' *TL" -CR*R.RR*TRR ) / ( RP*AUP )
               CA|,L  RENFKG(>'*TLP ^rL
               CALL  RENERG(P*TKl- /Fr.
               CALL  E.NEKCV(P*TP*FP/
        20    PPP=P
              p = p-ER
              pPaPPP

-------
             GU  TO  30
       10    CONTINUE
             RETURN
                      NE  EtFLTdP/P/TR/PJlE/QUV/FAS/FAPC/ECH/FC/FMWT)
             DATA  DHE/.2/
             TP.TR+3000.
       110   CALL  EUE*GY
-------
       XN,,CCaXNi-PP*»'P/ ( 1 ,F + ' *14
       CA( L  ECU''
       IE' JRP, HRT> [)RF )
       TV •L =
                                 i5.r -DUP  ))/(DUT +TF*DPT +KPJ
                            > FAS/ -ip/ FApORP* DyP^ Dl,T-» LUF^ DRP* DRT, DRp

                                          -ZP*(P
                                          ))/(DUT

-------
N)       10
               RETURN
               ENn
                        I.E  Wf-NrROf P, *B, P'lE, EfJR/FR/UR/DllTP. *RP,Ql!V, FAS,
               L)H*HFV-RF*Tr
               wfel JRN
               &N;;
               FU -CTIjNi  DF-tf (!»
               1=1
               iFf S.CE.f .9VF-3) 1*1*1

-------
                       APPENDIX D

       DEFINITIONS OF THE DEFORMANCE PARAMETERS

                  USED IN CHAPTER II
Indicate Specific
 Nitric Oxide
                    grams of NO^g/lb   2544 . 4 (Btu/hr-hr
                                          m
The work required for exhaust  and  intake  is  assumed to be

zero.                          (i _i,~\
                               L  *J
        Compression  =
           Work
                              x 7y8 — =  T2  x F*
                 CR =  compression ratio

       *The  term F was evaluated slightly differently

        for  the one system and two system models.
  Indicated Mean
 Effective Pressure
                                               .-ft ~lb->
                                                Btu
                                        ,AA
                                        144
 Indicated
 Ethalpy
              Heat

              °Comb.
                         fw    -w    •*
                         v exp   Gomp)
                                          Btu
                                                 ^
                                                 J
                                        total  rmx
                                      (1-EGR)
                       BTU
                                                      mx
                                           ar
                             221

-------
                     APPENDIX E




         AIR INJECTION FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT






     The flow rate of high pressure air going to the air



injection valve is measured by means of a flow restric-



tion.  The flow within the flow restriction is turbulent



and is assumed to be isothermal.  The heavy brass walls



of the flow restriction and its very small cross sectional



area will assist in making the flow more isothermal.  A



computer program was written which calculates the flow



rate as a function of the inlet pressure, inlet tempera-



ture and the exit pressure.  This computer program is



incorporated into the data reductions computer programs.



     When the computer program was compared to the cali-



bration data it was found that the friction factor equa-



tion had to be adjusted in order to obtain a fit.  Shown



in Figure El is a plot of the  actual and  calculated  exit



pressure of the  flow  restriction versus  the  actual



pressure drop  across  the  flow  restriction.   Only  a  few



points  fall outside  of an error  of  two  psi.   The  smallest



divisions on the  pressure gage is  one  psi.




     The subroutine called FRI  calculates the flow  rate



from the measured  inlet temperature, inlet pressure  and



outlet  pressure.   The program  uses  a trial and  error



method  to determine  the flow necessary  to have  a  calculated






                          222

-------
outlet pressure equal to the measured outlet pressure.



Many of the equations used were obtained from Chapman



(1971), the friction factor equivalence were obtained



from Kays (1966).



     The subroutine FRI follows.
                          223

-------
               SUBROUTINE FRI ( PATM ,TQ« Po»PBO»FR )
               DATA GC/32.l739/»R/53,36/»XK/1.399/.VES/12.^E-6/
              l»RH/4.066E-4/»XL/3.92/tA/1.112E-5/tZ/.105/»Y/.25/»Q/.2/
               TO*TO+459.69
               PO=(PO+PATM)*l44,
               Pa0= ( PBQ+PA TM ) *14.4»
               FRR=0.
               PB = PO
         60    FRA=FR/A
               CON=PO*SQRT(XK*GC/{R*TO)>
               XMArFRA/CON
         20    FRAA=COM*XMA/«l.-»-(XK-l.)*XMA*XMA/2.}**(
               EER=(FRA-FRAA) /FRA
               IF(ABS(EER)-1 •E-4)30»30«10
         10    XMA^IFRA-FRAAUXMA/FRAA-^XMA
w              GO TO 20
10        30    VFA=1,+(XK-1 . )*XMA«XMA/2.
*"              TA = TO/Vf A
               PA=PO/(VFA**(XK/(X<-1. ) ) )
               CA=SQRT(X«#R#TA#GC)
               REA=VA#4.*RH*PA/(R»TA*VES)
               IF(REA-3.E4)3l*31»32
         32    E=Z*t <3.E4)**
-------
         8.Q     XMB = XMB + (DFB-DFBB 1* L.XMA-XMB1X (DFA-DFRBl
                GO TO  40
         50     PBB=PB
                PB=PA*XMA/XMB
                ERR=PB-PBO
                IF«ABS(ERR)-.1)55»55»70
         70     FRS=FR
         100    FR=FR-ER**(FR-FRR)/(PB-PBB)
                FRR=FRS
                GO TO  60
         61     FR=.8*A*CA*PBO /(R#TA)
                PRINT»FR
         55     CONTINUE
                RETURN
                END
to
NJ
U1

-------
to
        +10
      to
      Pu
      -p
       o
       CVJ
      0,
            CL
        -10
       o
       rH
       nJ
       O
        •k
       CVJ
         -20
- Q
O w
o o
                        o
                         o
                                              O
                                                                              O
                                                              o
                                                                                              o
         -30
                                          -L
                             J	I	L
                 20
                Figure  El
          60         100
  Pressure  Drop = P2factual - PI (
                                                    200
400
             Comparison of Measured and  Calculated Flow Restriction
             Pressures for the Same Flow Rate
600

-------
                     APPENDIX F




        MECHANICAL DESIGN OF AIR INJECTION VALVE





    The air injection valve is a spring loaded and is



activated by a cam engaging the cam follower.  A sketch



of the air injection valve is shown in Figure Fl.  The



cam follower is mounted in a holder which can slide back



and forth to open and close the valve.  The spring is



used to keep the valve closed.  Downstream of the valve



seat is a flow restriction which prevents back flow of



high pressure and temperature products of combustion.



The large diameter nozzle is shown in the sketch, it



screws into the engine.



    The cam is mounted on a disc that is connected to a



shaft which in turn  is mounted on two bearings.  The



drive sprocket is keyed to the shaft.  The shaft is



perpendicular to the center line of the valve steam.



With the valve closed, the center line of the shaft  is



five inches from the center line of the cam  follower.



    A computerized milling machine was used  to make  the



cam surface.  An eight-power polynomial as described  by



Mabie et al.  (1958)  is used for the motion of the cam.



A computer program is used to  calculate the  shape of  the



cam surface.  The computer program for calculating the



cam surface follows.
                            227

-------
                                                                     Pressure Air
to
NJ
00
                                       Section A-A
F1°W      / K,   1
Restriction Nozzle
                                                Figure  Fl     A Sketch of the
                                                             Air Injection Valve

-------
     A second computer program is necessary to convert



the shape of the cam to punched tape instruction for



the milling machine.  M. Fugelso very capably made the



punch tape and operated the milling machine.
                          229

-------
to
CO
o
             XL*, u
             K ; j * i> t
             K = . 6 2 >
             isK«t*l
             J.J  U> i
 /< 5'  ( '
« ^ ' * •  " - * b
 A, *  6, 'w/y
        0     Ts I *. J /C
                         7 T
                          r *Slu( -M )  •' :pr---
n £ I = .i t T A '•' i ' 0 • / 3 , i '* • A'
(JAcoA.i';!'l ,,~ . •  , . ; ^l'^
PRi'-il/oB/Kr M y ^ K ^ ^ T ( . P .-A ,.
   '
                                                     ? fr.
                                               .-^R P*C 'IS ! "A
                                                E T •>">"
 2
 3
 4
 s
 A
 7
 n
 (s
 O
If
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
i£
19
zr*
21
22
23
                                                                                       26
                                                                                       27
                                                                                       2?
                                                                                       29

-------
                     APPENDIX G





          PERFORMANCE OF AIR INJECTION VALVE





     A computer program was written which predicts the



flow rate through the nozzle for various angular posi-



tions of the cam.  The program also calculates the dynam-



ic forces resulting from the cam engaging the cam follower



The flow is assumed to be  isentropic.  The flow is not



allowed to be supersonic because neither the valve seat



or the air injection nozzle have a converging-diverging




shape.



      The flow path  through the valve  starts  with  an



isentropic  compression  to  the  valve  opening  area,  then



a  sudden enlargement  to the inside  diameter  of  the valve



seat  and followed by  an isentropic  compression  to the



diameter of the nozzle.   The subroutine ISENT handles



 isentropic  compressions, the STEP subroutine handles



 sudden steps in the diameter and when the nozzle is near



 choked flow it  is necessary to reverse the calculations



 of the step which is done by PETS.



      The air injection valve performance computer pro-




 gram follows.
                          231

-------
             DATA  GC/32,l739//R/5%36/>XK/l,309//
            1Q/3 • 1*159/ , QG/.01T4MZ //'•'/ 1. //SK/40.//FU/ IOC./
             READ/NUR
             PRINT, DC
            RE AD/ pH, TO
NJ           AL« -tt
            C»  166667
            TOBF. '.1+459, 69
            PQ.P 1*144,
            SQ" IH/(6
            V'G«C + ,5-
            PE«PC'C*(
            PE«PE*14
            T=TH/B
            lF(T-l,)
      12    T=M3SlT-
      11    CO-TINUE
            1-571, 6053* (T**5j +143. 4132* (T**6)

-------
              -i3» 60965*7, *(T**6)+2.5^°5*8*(T**7) )
             RRnSi-D*XL
             XL.XL/IZ,
             XD«XL*D
       38    AA
             GO TH 37
       39    &A
       37    PQE»PU/PE
             AC«Q*OC*DC/4.
             SAB^AA/Ak
w            RBC«AB/AC
<*>            RAc3RAB*pBc
             XM«SQRT((->1. + (PUE**(UK-1.)/XK) ) ) *2 , / ( XK-1
             Ip( U-XM)^l*42/42
       ^l    XMtl.O
       15    XMA*XM
             GO TO 17
       16    XMA«XM/RAC
       17    £R^=PUE
             XMAA«0,
       95    IF
       22    CALt
             GO TD 23
       21    CALL 5TEP(XMAjRAR/XMr.jpA&/tAr.,iLA)
       23    CALL
       91    «BA*1./RAB

       93    CALL  PETS(XMAjRA3/X'!8,PA3/TAB/LA)

-------
97



92
?6

90
       IF(LA-J  )90/SO/97
       CALL  5TEP(XMA/RA'*-/Xf,.-/PAp;/TA-/LA)
       CALL  I5EM{XMB,R».C,X':C,P"C,T-C,Lr, )
       GQ  rn  90
       CALL  ISEf'TUKBjRr.A/X'lA/Pr.A/T-A/LA)
      TA .
                   -1, )*X'iA«X,"A/?, )**(XK/(XI>1.
                            'A/Z,
65
      00  Tl 95
      XMS«XMA
      03 T-; 95
76    DRlNT,ERfi,pnE/PUr
75    CO .«PU*SORT(XK+Gf
                       .* ( Xl-'-l
                                           . ) **(
          I ")/TUA
          lt-XMA>77/77/73

-------
     77    PB-PE
           TB«0,
           PC-0,
           TC«0,
           GQ TiJ 79
     78    PB«P4/PA'r
           PC-P8/P9C
           TCaFB/TBC
            TB.TB-^59.69
            TC.TC-459,69
            PR INT, XD/AA,RA3jr.SC/
            PRjNTjFRA,FRBjFRC
            PRINT, SU
            PRlNTjPQjPAjPB/PCjPE
            PRlNTjTQjTAjTBjTC
      70    STOP
            END
     79    FCKSFU + SK*XD + 3.*:>uP '*FP !*ACC
           PC <•-. "S I N ( A L > *F C* / T ' 15 ( ;,l )
to          FC-.»FCK/Cr)5(AL)
h{          aLLL«AL/'*Q

-------
      SUP ROUTINE  ISENTfXMA/RAB/XMR/PAH/TAB/L)
      DATA XK/1,399/

      l"l
      RAS»<( U,«-(XK-lt)*XM.\*XMA/2.)/((XK+l.}/2t) )**( (XK+1,
     U/XMA
&1
      CB«XMB/( (i.+txk-i. )*xfn*x:in/r.. >**(
      CA«CXMA*P.AB)/( { I ,*(XK-l, J *XMA*XMA/2. )**( (XK+1. ) / ( 2 , *( XK-1 . ) j ) )
51    XM.S«XMA
      lF(bRK"fcPRfi 5 1QO/43/KC
      XMAA-XMS
      GO 1:1 31
      CA.(XMA#RAB>/( ( l. + (X'r.-l. )*XMA*X'1A/2. }#x<( (XK-»lt ) / ( 2 1 * < XK-1
30
50    XMS«XMB
      XMP«XMB-fcRR*(Xr'B«X'!F" ) / (Ff.P-r.RRR )
      XMM'-'XMS
      GO T'J 30

-------
to
        70    CONTINUE
60
              SUBRQUTlf E   $TEPCXMA,RAB,X:iP/PAfJjTA8,L)
              DATA XK/1.399/
              L«l»
        62    !F(X",A-lt ) 60, 61,61
        «sl    X.Mi = l.
              L-2
              CA»
              XMV>*1,
                                                                           )*
?0

101
102
90
CB«XMA*SCRT(
              F.RKK«EKR
              6RR=(CA-CB)/CA
              IFtABS(EF)-.
              EFaEF/2,
              GO TO 102
              XMRB«XMS
                              *X'1.A*Xf-',A/2 ,
                                                         XK-
                                           ^ ) *XI1B

-------

      GO TO 30
43    PRlNT
40    FBA«(
      PAB"XMB*5QRT(FBA>/(X:iA*pA^)
      RETURN
      EN'1'
      SUf»RCiUTlf-E   PETS ( Xf ;A, RAB/XMR, PAD/ TAB
      •>ATA XK/1,399/
50

101   EF«"ER«*{XMA»X'MAA}/( f EPR-EP RP. ) *X 1A )
102   lF(AaS(EF)-.l )10^/1P"/00
90    EFnfcF/2.
      GO  TD  102
                 *Xi A
      00 TO  30
43    PRlNT/ERf

-------
                              : /(X"A*RAB)
to
U)
vo

-------
                     APPENDIX H






            DATA REDUCTION COMPUTER PROGRAMS








     The data obtained from each operating condition (run)



is punched on computer cards to expedite the calculations.



Two computer programs are available one with a short out-



put in which the important results are on one line, the



other longer output provides more detail.  One important



advantage of using a computer program to reduce the data



is that, if changes are desired in the calculations, all



of the calculations can easily be repeated.



     The long output and then the short output computer



programs follow.  Note that the subroutine FRI called



by the programs is included in Appendix E.
                          240

-------
       APPENDIX I
CONVERSIONS  TO SI UNITS
Term
Length
Force
Mass
Temperature
Energy
Energy
Power
Pressure
IMEP
ISNO
CFM
RPM
Units Used
In Report
inches
lbf
Ib
m
°R
BTU
hp-hr
hp
psi
II
g/ihp-hr
ft3/min.
rev . /min .
To Obtain
SI Units
x 25.4
x 4.448
T 2.2
T 1.8
x 1055.
x 2684519.
x 745.7
x 6895.
11
x .0003725
x. 0004719
* 60.
SI Units
millimeters (mm)
Newton (N )
Kilogram (kg)
Deg. Kelin (°K)
Joule (J)
Joule or Watt-sec
Watt (W)
Pascal (Pa) (N/m2)
II
kg/J or kg/W-sec.
m /sec.
Hertz (Hz) (rev. /sec.)
            241

-------
55
      DIMENSION' TITLE<23)
      DATA  K/53.36//TAM59.6(V/'-J/.fH40° //XK/ 1 .3*<>/> VC/37t 33/
     1/FAS/.06628/
      dRlTE(6M3)
45    FOsMAT
15'0   *EAD F7 . n, ' J-: HG   ^4 A* '/ F7, !/ '
                         -  :C= S F7 .r(/ i nr i-|  <•;-;= « / F7, - ,, ' r
                                       C- 1   ^= ' > E
  185 FOM-IAT{'  RMReljfT^.B., i    T13s ' , p7

-------
               IF(FRIA)U, 11/12
         12     CALL FPI
         75     FQHMATP MASS FLPVI  R'.TF-   FUEL* ' f F9 . "», ' US /S "C   C AF-BMRfcTrn AIR*
              IjF'i.S1  INJECTED Ap.= ',r\6)
               FRTA«FKCA+FKIA
               i»lT«FRIA/FRTA
               ftCT*FRCA/FRTA
               :vRlTE(6,85)RCT,RIT
         ^5     FORMAT (' FRACTlLl1' IF  AIR  C Ap-r 'JRETED* '> F7 . 2, '  F^CT
              ICTEO««/F7,5)
               £Ru=FKF/ (FRTA*FA5 J
w        95    FQ^MATC EQUIVALENCE  RATP-  ClVF.f-ALL. '/ F7.4/ '   C A" nUr.ETFn- f , F7 .
                        ./ (C*S)
         195   FO.MAT(i
                                             ? AT'! ) / ( n2 + PAT M ) ) ** <  /XK) ) «
                XK -l.)
               HPlC-HPI-HPC
                .                   <
         105   FQxMATC HQRSPOW^K-  GROSS BP AKE= ' / F7,4/ ' ^  EST  JfjJ  AJR  Cr
              1F7.4,«  NET H                                          -

-------
      EEJC-HPIOA
      '/,RirE(6,U5)EEB/EERC,EI:I/E
,15   FQkMAT(i  ENTHALPY EF^ 1C I F'lC Y-  Gr.QSS 3RAKE-* ' , F6.4/ '   "E
     1,F6.4/'   GRCSS r!iIC.\TED-',F6.4, '   NET  I' ,C K ATHC = ' / H> . 4
      XT fcP«iiPJ*&
125   pOxMATP  MFAr- EppECTTyr  n^CSSuP.F-  G^.'-.SS  ETJKEs '/ p7
      H   iMf-r  BKAKE. '/?•», s/ •   c-!>1PRrssrv'U'/r7.?/'   cerss
      2'   NET  r-n«SF7.?.)
               X*E/HPS
      BCSNX»XNL'X*E/MP8C
     XirsX«XWriX*E/HPlC
     '•'R I T E ( 6 , 155 ) PS^UX/ F.C c-f !X/ X I SMX/ X I C SX
55   FQ^MA  P  SPECIFIC MPX-   GRPSS RR AKE= • , 1 12 , P, ' G'l/ ( ' !P-. I )
              i.''   r^nS55 ! "^= ' , r 12 . 5, '   NFT I ,J'J= ' , E
                         .                   r 12 .

      F-. 01*28, 011*13
      BCSCOeCG*F/HpBC
      XI.sCi!*CU*F/HPI
      -,u.,
      FQ.MATl'  SPECIFIC  C.P-   C^SS BRAKE = ' , E 1 2 . 5, ' MV (
     li   NF.T  BKAKE.SE12.5,'   ^"S^ I N.r,, • , r 12 , ?, '   NPT
         'SsKMrv*0.u566'?*(Tl3-Tl4)
                                                        (i ;>- ;  -
                                                          JMi)« '
      HTC A'Ss

-------
                                  T;J
       ST  P

       CI  b' SID'  TITLE(24)
                                                      / VC /37.
      l*FAS/.06t-29/
       " RI re (o> ^5)
       FORMAT (//?   s'jiWAKY  'P  Rrs'iLTs  -F'//J
       >/RlTE(6*201)
       FQhMATf'   RUf  ER"*   r"C     Fi.CA   Si-CA  SP-(.A   rPM    MP     Ct'P
      1    IREG   IEEN  IMEPO  IMEP'I   '^X-PPM  '^HX-Sr,   C^.pFR  CP-SC  .'1C-PPM
      2')
35
      «
      P E A U / P A T f • 1 / P 2 * P 4 A t v A B * P 4 £
12    CALL

-------

     fcRri«FRF/(FRTA*FA?)
     £RC«FRF/(FRCA*FAS)
     Kp:i«XN*60,/(C*S)
      HP1«HPB+HPM
      EEJ«HPl*A
      EElC»HPIC*A
                    *31')nn» /114
                    fe*n
               X*b/HPI
20J   FU
     13/F7.0/)
                    150
      ST.:^
      EN i.'

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            {Please read Inuniclions on the reverse be/ore completing)
i. R£cor< i NO.
   EPA-460/3-76 -022
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  Nitrogen Oxide Control  With the Delayed—
  Mixing Stratified-Charge Engine Concept
             3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
             5, REPORT DATE
                 July  1976
             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHORS)
        L.W. Evers, P.S.  Myers, O.A. Uyehara
             8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PER FO TIMING ORG "KNI Z ATI ON NAME AND ADDRESS
        Dept. of Mechanical Engineering
        University  of  Wisconsin-Madison
        Madison, Wisconsin  53706
              10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
              11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
                                                                R-803858-01-0.
 12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
        Environmental Protection AGency
        Emission  Control Technology Division'
        Ann Arbor,  Michigan  48105
              13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
                  11-10-75-11-9-76
              14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
 15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTfcS
 16. ABCfUACT
        The  purpose of this study  is  to explore methods of  controlling the
        nitrogen oxide emissions from internal combustion engines.   From
        computer calculations,  the delayed mixing stratified  charge  engine
        concept was selected.   In  the delayed mixing stratified  charge en-
        gine concept, combustion is initiated and completed in a fuel-rich
        region, then air is mixed  into those rich products.   A study of
        existing engines shows  that some operational stratified  charge en-
        gines limit nitrogen  oxide emissions in a manner similar to  the
        delayed mixing  concept.   A single cylinder engine  was modified to
        include an air injection valve.  When air was  injected after rich
        combustion, the nitrogen oxide emissions were  lower,  the hydro-
        carbon emissions were lower,  the carbon monoxide emissions were
        about the same and  the  efficiencies were lower than for  homogeneous
        operation at the same overall fuel-air ratio.
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  CK... 1IPTORS
         exhaust emissions,  combustion
         products, internal  combustion
         engines, nitrogen'oxides, valves,
         burning rate
r;. DI.: r 0
           % s r A i r_M
         Unlimited
                                              b. IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
  stratified charge
  engines, delayed
  mixing, post
  oxidation
                                               I'J. SECUFIITY CLASS ('1 His liffmrtj

                                                          f led	
2O. SECURITY CLASS (Tliis page}
   Unclassified
                                                                            COSATl Field/Group
0702, 1311,
2102, 2107,
2111
                           21. NO. Oh CAGES
                                 246
                                                                          22. PRICE
EPA Form • J20-1 (9-73)

-------