Guidance for the Development of
State Work Programs for FY-81 Unaer the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
IT «3 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIOil
-------
CONTENTS 26555
Page
I. General
A. Introduction 1
B. Funding 2
C. State/EPA Agreements 3
D. FY 80 Program Evaluations 4
II. Subtitle C
A. Introduction , 5
B. Position and Policy Statements 7
C. Fundable Work Tasks 11
III. Subtitle D
A. Introduction 13
'B. Work Program Requirements 14
C. Funding Priorities " 17
D. Federal/State Funding Shares 18
List of Tables
I. Subtitle C State Grants- ' 19
II. Subtitle D State Grants 20
III. Open Dump Inventory - FY 80 Status 21
IV. Open Dump Inventory - FY 81 Projections 25
V. Regulatory Powers - FY 80 Status 29
VI. Regulatory Powers - FY 81 Projections 30
Appendix A - Definition of Terms 31
Appendix B - General Guidance for 32
Cooperative Arrangements with
States that seek Authorisation
under RCRA but do not Qualify
-------
I. General
A. Introduction
This guidance is to supplement 40 CFR Part 35, State
and Local Assistance, the current EPA regulation governing
State Program grants under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976. The regulation, with this supplemental
guidance, is to be used in developing and reviewing grant
applications, awarding grants, and monitoring grant activities
for FY 81. The regulation should be consulted for grant
eligibility requirements and limitations on grant awards.
Additional information relating to State program grants
may be found in:
1. State Hazardous Waste Programs, Proposed -Consolidated
Permit Regulations (40 CFR Part 123, s'ubparts A and B, 44 FR
34244, 6/14/79). This rule describes the various provisions
and capabilities a State hazardous waste program must have
in order to qualify for authorization under the Act, and is to
be promulgated in April 1980. (Also see Advance Notice of
Final Regulation, 45 FJR 6753, 1/29/80).
2. Identification of Regions and Agencies for Solid '
Yfaste Management, Interim Guidelines (40 CFR Part 255,
42 PR 24926, 5/16/77). These guidelines present criteria
and procedures for identification of regional boundaries.
and responsible agencies for solid waste planning and*-implernen- ''
tation.
3. Guidelines for Development and Implementation of
State Solid Waste Management Plans, (40 CFR Part 256, 44 FR
-------
45066, 7/31/79).
4. Criteria for the Classification of Solid Waste
Disposal Facilities and Practices (40 CFR 257, 44 FR 53438,
9/13/79). This document provides the standard against which
disposal facilities are to be evaluated to determine whether
they are to be listed in the inventory of open dumps. It
also defines practices which constitute open dumping.
5. Public Participation Programs under the Resource
»
Conservation and Recovery Act', Safe Drinking Water Act, and
.Clean Water Act (40 CFR Part 25 44 FR 10286, 2/1T5/7S) . This
rule sets forth general requirements for involving the public in
the development and implementation of programs under these Acts.
Program specific provisions to implement public participation
requirements under RCRA are contained in 40 CFR Parts 123 and 256,
6. The EPA Operating Year Guidance for FY'81. The solid
waste section of this document contains a statement of national
objectives and priorities. It addresses the expected outputs
and accomplishments of EPA Headquarters, EPA Regions, and
State grant programs. It includes the Administrator's Guidance
on FY 1981 State/EPA Agreements.'
B. Funding
The projected funds for FY 81 State program grants are:
(1) $30 million under Section 3011 for the development
and implementation of State hazardous waste programs,
v
(See Table I), and
(2) $8 million under Section 4008(a}(l) for the development
and implementation of State solid waste programs. (See
Table II.)
- 2 -
-------
The grant funds appropriated and awarded in fiscal year
1931 under Section 3011 will be kept separate front the grant
funds appropriated and awarded under Section 4008. The only
.exception to this policy is that up to 15% of a State's
Subtitle C grant may be transferred into Subtitle D for use
in the planning of hazardous waste disposal facilities.
Such transfers will be approved on a case-by-case basis by
the DAA for Solid Waste.
C. State/EPA Agreements (SEA's)
Section 35.738-6 of the "Amendments to Interim Grant
Regulations to Implement the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act of 1976" requires that "State programs funded under the Act
will be part of the State/EPA Agreement, and the State/EPA
Agreement must be completed before the rant award." The
general EPA procedures for developing and negotiating SEA's
are presented in the "Handbook for FY 1981 State/EPA Agreements",
dated February 1980, which was issued by EPA's Office of Water
and Waste Management. It also includes the Administrator's
Guidance for FY 81 State/EPA Agreements. Each Regional Office
is responsible for implementing its own specific procedures,
. consistent with the Guidance, for developing and negotiating
agreements with its States.
SEA's provide a mechanism by which the States and EPA
-V
can integrate and manage the several programs under which EPA
provides technical and financial assistance to the States.
In implementing RCRA the States and EPA will have to coordinate
closely with programs under other Acts. Hence, SEA's will play
an important role in the implementation of RCRA.
-------
D. FY 80 Program Evaluations
In accordance with the annual work program submission
requirements and the program evaluation and reporting
requirements of the grant regulations (see Sections 35.718-2
and 35.744, respectively) all FY 81 work program submissions
for both Subtitle C and D must contain a copy of any written
report of 'program evaluation conducted during FY 80. State
responses to such reports may-also be included in the work
>
program submission.
-------
II. Subtitle C
A. Introduction
Under Sections 3006(c) and (b) of RCRA, respectively,
both "interim" and "final" authorization are provided for
participation by States in the hazardous waste regulatory
program. The regulations under Section 3006 of the Act (40
CFR Part 123) detail requirements for determining whether a
State program is equivalent to the Federal program, is
consistent with the Federal program and other State
hazardous waste programs, has adequate enforcement provisions,
and is thus eligible for authorization. Few State programs
meet these criteria at the present- time. The Interim Authori-
zation category is meant to provide a developmental period
during which existing State programs "can be improved to meet
the 3006(b) Final Authorization requirements. The eligibility
requirements for Interim Authorization are flexible enough
to permit most States to qualify in FY 1981. Thpse States
which do not qualify may enter into Cooperative Arrangements
with EPA to administer portions of the Federal regulatory
program.
During FY 1981j States will be developing application
submissions for authorization, establishing the necessary
regulatory structure at the State level, taking the steps
required to initiate equivalent hazardous waste regu-tatory
programs, and conducting the necessary hearings. Depending
on the stage of development of the individual State programs,
the States will be implementing the necessary legislative
-------
authority, regulations, and resources to operate the manifest
system, conduct surveillance and enforcement activities, and
to begin or continue to conduct a permit program.
EPA will be issuing its hazardous waste regulations in
two major phases. Therefore, interim authorisation will be
divided into two phases which correspond to the two Federal
regulation phases. Phase I will cover identification of
hazardous wastes, generator _and transporter requirements and
preliminary facility standards, and will be promulgated in
April, 1980. Phase II will cover permitting of hazardous
waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities and should
be promulgated in October, 1980.
The two phases are considered to be integral parts of a
complete State hazardous waste program; EPA does not intend
to provide authorization for only one phase, since it views
interim authorization as a stage leading towards final authori-
zation.
States may receive interim authorization for Phase I
beginning on the effective date of the initial Section 3001-
3005 regulations (October, -1980). States may receive interim
authorization for Phase II or final authorization after the
Phase II Section 3004 regulation is effective (April, 1981).
In order to give States the two-year period of time that
f ' :
Congress intended be available to them to develop final
programs, interim authorization for both phases will be
allowed to continue for 24 nonths from the effective date of
the Phase II Section 3004 regulation (or until April, 1983).
-6-
-------
At the end of this period, all interim authorizations will
automatically expire, and EPA will administer the Federal
program in any State which has not received final authorization.
3. Position and Policy Statements
1. FY 81 State Hazardous Waste P'rograri Grants - The grant
regulations under Section 3011 provide an allocation formula
for the distribution of funds for hazardous waste management
*
programs. This formula establishes the maximum grant amount
d
available to a given State. On the other hand th.e grant
amount needed by a given State will depend on (1) the size
of the hazardous waste problem in that State (number of
permits required, etc.), (2) the size of the State program
necessary to deal with the problem at a level which meets
the EPA criteria for authorization, (3) the degree to which
full scale program development has progressed, and (4)
whether the State will seek to develop a hazardous waste
control program or leave the regulatory program to EPA. A
State should seek the grant amount needed. Tne Regions
should fund State programs up to the amount available
under the allocation formula. If some States do not seek or
are not granted the maximum available, the Regions may
redistribute the excess funds to other States within the Region
even if the letters' totals are increased above their available
allocation. FY 81 Subtitle C allotments by State and* Region
are presented in Table I (which also includes the FY 80
allotments for comparison).
-7-
-------
'r'ne frignest priority use of FY 81 grant funds is
development of authorized (interim/final) State
regulatory programs. Grant funds are to be used for other
purposes in a Region only where this highest priority activ-
ity has been fully funded in- all States within the Region.
Vihether a State's program is authorized in fiscal year 1981
or beyond will not affect funding under Section 3011, i.e.,
!»,.
unauthorized but developing State programs will continue to
be fundable under Section 3011. States which are- ineligible
4
for authorization may still be. funded for the development of
an authorizable program in FY 82 or beyond, provided they
enter into Cooperative Arrangements (See item 5 below).
Grant allocation ratios will remain as established "until
additional nationally-consistent data supporting revision
are obtained.
It should be noted that it is EPA policy to exclude
hazardous waste management facility (site) planning from
Section 3011 funding. This type of activity will be eligible
for funding only under Subtitle D. However, limited provisions
for transfer of Subtitle C funds for this purpose are set
forth in paragraph 4 below. A'll other hazardous waste manage-
ment program activities will be eligible for funding under
Subtitle C (Section 3011), provided that the highest priority
activity has been fully funded.
2. Inactive Site Surveys - Where RCRA grant monies are
available in excess of those needed in a given State for
-3-
-------
development of an authorizable program, the State should be
urged to undertake a survey (including sampling, where appro-
priate) to locate and evaluate inactive sites which may
cause problems. As an adjunct to such a survey, Regions
are encouraged to consider -the Peer Matching and Technical
Assistance Panels Programs as a way to augment State efforts
and resources.
f m
These surveys may be funtied- as hazardous waste program
development and implementation activities under the authority
of Section 35.722(b)(l) and (4) of the October 20, 1977,
interim RCRA Grant Regulations (42 FR 56050) which-call for
hazardous waste management surveys and monitoring of pollutants,
respectively.
Note, however, that no provisions have been established
in either the grant regulations or related guidance for the
funding of remedial actions necessary once the problem has
been identified and investigated. Such activities and are .
not to be funded with Section 3011 grant funds.
3. Notification Activities - The only notification related
activities which are eligible for FY 81 funding are those data
collection and refinement activities preparatory to the act
of notifying (majJL-out} which were funded in FY 79 and/or 80
and are not yet completed. If the State did not undertake .
* '
notification-related activities in FY 80 it will not be funded
to do so in FY 81. The act of notifying will not be funded in
FY 81 unless it is mandated {not simply allowed) ur.der State
law and that law was enacted prior to September 30, 1979.
- 9 ~
-------
Section 3010 states that notifications are to be submitted
to EPA or authorized States. Since no States will be
authorized by the first notification deadline (est. July 1980)
the first Federal notification program authorized by Section
3010 of RCRA will be conducted nationwide by EPA. This will
occur even where States have conducted a State notification
pcogranrr Subsequent notifications may be conducted by
authorized JStates and funding use will be allowed for thai
purpose.
4. Transfer of Subtitle C funds - Up to 15% of a State's
FY 81 Subtitle C grant may be transferred into Subtitle D
for the purposes of planning for h-azardous waste management
facilities. (See Section III B, Output 4). Requests for
such transfers must be submitted to the DAA, OSW, for
consideration on a case-by-case basis.
5. Cooperative Arrangements. In the event that a State
desires to receive grant funds, but its program is not
expected to receive interim or final authorization in FY 81,
the State must enter into a Cooperative Arrangement with EPA.
Under the Arrangement the State can be funded to continue to
develop an authorizable program while it participates with
EPA in administering the Federal program until such time as
the State program is authorized. No funds shall be provided
any State in FY 81 unless the Arrangement contains ati
Authorization Plan specifying hosv the State will qualify for
authorization. (See Appendix B, "General Guidance for
*
Cooperative Arrangements with States that seek Authorization
- 10 -
-------
under RCRA but do not Qualify" for further discussion of
the background, purpose, scope, applicability, and
procedures applicable in these situations).
No hazardous waste management grant shall be awarded any
State in FY 81 unless the State is applying for Authorization
or is negotiating a Cooperative Arrangement with the Regional
Office. Since the duration of the Cooperative Arrangement
is the Federal fiscal year, it^ must be renegotiated annually.
Such negotations should take place as part of the normal
grant negotiations.
C. Fundable Work Tasks
This section discusses fundable work tasks for both
interim and final authorization. Fundable work tasks under
Cooperative Arrangements can be the sane as those presented
below. Work tasks have been grouped into two categories
for ease of presentation and to reflect the relative emphasis
to be placed on the activities of the categories.
1. Top Priority Work Tasks
- Provide adequate fiscal and workforce resources,
including training of staff.
- Develop/implement regulatory powers/ including
legislation, regulations/ and procedures. Top priority
procedures include the manifest system, permit priorities/
mechanism, and the surveillance and enforcement program.
Develop/submit application for authorization (including
"Authorization Plan" required for Interim Authorization
and Cooperative'Arrangement).
-1] -
-------
Provide emergency response system, including technical
advice/assistance capability and procedures for follov-
up of remedial measures applied.
Integrate/coordinate hazardous waste program with other
programs under the Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking tfater
Act, and the State solid waste plan under Subtitle D
of RCRA, with emphasis on establishing adequate
facility capacity.
Provide public participation mechanisms, -including:
procedures for public -input in the development of
regulatory powers, Authorization Plan, annual work
program, issuance of permits; systems for investigation
of public reports of possible violations; and mechanisms
for information dissemination and consultation.
2. Other Work Tasks
Provide technical assistance to affected community on
regulatory requirements and technology.
Survey State for inactive hazardous waste sites,
conducting individual assessments and sampling and
analysis as appropriate.
Appropriate outputs for individual States will be determined
by negotiations between State and Regional Office staffs. Tasks
proposed in the grant application (work program) should be in
accordance with the program schedule in any proposed "*or approved
authorization plan. Section 3006 and 3011 Regulations (and
associated guidance documents and nemos) will provide the
structure and more detailed information about State requirements
and should be used as a'foundation in these negotiations.
-12-
-------
III. Subtitle D
A. Introduction
Regulations promulgated under Sections 4002 and 4004
of RCRA in 1979 signaled the beginning of full State implemen-
tation of the Subtitle D program. During FY SO, States are
developing plans which meet the requirements of the 4002 guide-
lines and'are classifying disposal facilities in accord with
w
the 4004 criteria. Both of these activities will reach important
milestones in FY 81; plans are to be adopted by the States and
submitted to EPA. by January 31, 1981, and during that same
month EPA will publish the first installment of the open dump
inventory based on the State's facility classification results.
States which do not submit facility classification for the open
dunp inventory by Sept.. _ 30, 1930, will.not be eligible for
financial assistance in FY 81,
During FY 81, State Subtitle D activities will continue
to center around the State plan and open dump inventory. States
must complete any remaining work on the plan by January 31, 1981,
in order to remain eligible for Section 4.008 funding. States
will build upon their FY 80 facility classification efforts,
.investigating additional facilities and completing unfinished
work from FY 80.
An important adjunct to State planning and inventory
»
activities is the development 'of regulatory powers needed to
close and upgrade existing open dumps and prevent new open
dumps. States should plan to co~pl_ete_their_ development of
regulatory powe^r^ in all Criteria areas curing FY 61'.
-13-
-------
Also critical to the State solid waste management effort
is the provision of adequate disposal facilities for disposal
of solid and hazardous waste. The work program should indicate
that State facility planning efforts will be a priority activity.
Finally, State work program must address alternative funding
schemes to ensure that State program can compensate for the
expected phase out of Federal funding by FY 84.
B. V,Tork Program Requirements
Output 1: Development and Adoption of State Plan-
Task Elements:
a) The State is to develop a State plan which addresses
all requirements of 40 CFR 256. The work program
is to include a^ summary of progress as of'6/80 on
development of a plan and a schedule for. completing
work on the plan by 1/31/81, allowing time necessary
for public participation, A-95 review and State
adoption.
b) Request State Attorney General opinion on whether
State has adequate legal authority to prohibit the
establishment of new open dumps and to close or
upgrade existing open dumps. (See 40 CFR 256.20
and related preamble discussion) ., Incorporate or
reference this opinion in State plan.
Output 2t Classifying Facilities for Open Dump Inventory
Task Elements:
a) Complete Table III (A-D) showing status for FY SO.
-14-
-------
List total numbers of facilities and the number of
permitted facilities identified in the categories of
municipal landfills, industrial landfills, surface
impoundments and, landspreading facilities. {See
definition of terms/ in Appendix A). List individual
facilities for which inventory classification work
has been done or is expected to be done in FY 80
"V
and indicate the degree, of work per instructions on
the table.
b) Complete Table IV (A-D), listing projections for FY 81.
c) Briefly describe the State's strategy for conducting
the inventory work; e.g., determining State priorities
for classifications, training of "inspectors, providing
information on the program to the public and facility
operators, etc.-
Output 3: Development and Implementation of Regulatory Powers
Task Elements
a) Complete Table V showing status for FY SO (as of 6/80).
b) Complete Table VI listing projections for FY 81.
ijc) Briefly describe the actions taken to close or
upgrade open dumps in FY 80 and projections for
FY 81.
Output 4: Facility Planning and Implementation
v-
Task Elements
a) Provide a brief summary of the State' s poJ.icy_to
encourage, locate and develop environmentally sound
solid and hazardous waste management facilities,
~~ '
-------
b) Indicate the status of FY 80 activities to irr.pl er.er.t
this policy.
c) Discuss the Staters FY 81 hazardous waste facility
siting and implementation strategy. Briefly describe
the State's activities in this area; e.g. identifi-
i r -
cation of public/private roles in siting; asses sr.snts
w ' - ---- _____ _____ ___ - - - ____ - - - .
of available facility capacity and
siting needs; identification of envjLrQnmanhal 1y
suitable/ unsuitable areas for siting in the
State; the development of procedures and criteria
forfuture siting decisions: pursuit of needed
State law and regulations r etc. (See Section
II. B.4 regarding support. of these task elements) .
Output 5: Developing Alternative State Funding
Task Elements:
a) Provide a summary of the State's strategy in
searching for alternative funding sources for
the State program.
b) Briefly discuss the status of FY 80 State activities
to develop alternative funding sources.
c) Describe the alternative approaches that will be
considered in FY 81; e.g. increasing State general
revenues; user fees, including facility permit and
-tf
licensing and hauler registration; bottle bills,
product charges, special taxes or assessments, etc.
-16-
-------
C. Funding Priorities
Given the limited funding available, use of the grant
monies for any purposes other than the required outputs listed
in III. B requires prior approval of the DAA for Solid Waste.
As in FY 80, the open dunp inventory remains the highest
priority use of Subtitle D grant monies. A minimum of 60% of
the State's allocation should be devoted to classifying
facilities and taking follow-up enforcement actions to close
or upgrade open du-ps. (However) grant funds are not to be
used for purchase of equipment or capitol improvements at
problem facilities). Requests for expenditure of a lower
percentage should be submitted for approval of the DAA for
Solid Waste. Requests for DAA approval should include a
justification for devoting less than 60% to the inventory
and should show that che.State is making substantial progress
in completing the inventory work.
Allocation (pass-through) of Section 4008 funds to State
and substate agencies is low priority. Pass-through may occur
only where:
1. prior approval of the DAA for Solid Waste is obtained;
2. the agency to receive the funds has been properly
identified in accord with Section 4006 of the Act and
40 CFR 255; and
3. the funded activities are directly related To the work
program requirements listed in III. B.
-17-
-------
D Federal/State Funding Shares
' ^e crant regulations (40 CFR 35.714)
of total allowable State wor* pro,.- costs
an exception for allowable wort program costs associated with
the open dump InventorY^heJedera^jhar.- of these latt.r_
costs may extend to _10p__percent._
i^IoTT^^" of the Act provides an allocation formula
for distribution of Section M08 funds «»n. States on
a popuiation basis. Table II indicates tentative State
allocations of the $8 million'available in FY 81.
-18-
-------
TABLE I
Subtitle C State Grants
XCIOU I
Concecticut
Mzinc
?-'i .^- c a a chu r, c tt s
licv Kc.n)t>r,hire
Rhode Island
Vermont
RKJIOK IT
New Jersey .
Jlcv York
Puerto lUco
Virgin Islands
REOICm "llT
Dclftvrjre
ISaryliuul
pcnusv'Jvftaia
Virginia
Vent VJ.:>"?lnl a
. Di r,^ . o'C Columbia
REcroir- iv"
Alivbft-'.i
Florida
Ccox-ftin.
Xcn-t.ucKy
J-'.is^iCSl-O-Di' »
1,'or-tb Carolina
South -Carolina
'JVnncr.r.rc
KEG IOH V
ininoir.
Tr.il1. Ann.
MJchlri-.u
Klnnr..fj'..a
''-'-
1980
1,018,-350
(222,081)
( 93,000)
(395^991)
( 93,000)
(121,272)
( 93,000)
1,795,006
( 553,722)
(1,013,080)
( 105,276)
( 93,000)
2,035,390
( 93,000)-
( 253,090)
(lfUl'i,U.l6)
( 237,150).
( 313,512)
( 93,000)'
2,728,131
(362,320)
(103,111)
(316, 911)
(322,521)
% -<-127,221) '
(365,113)
(272JJ62)
(170,020)
3,796,116
^_ MO, 3.00}
( 5/2, OUO)
( 761,056)
( 223.3JJ6)
(1,015,100)
1981
I", 612,500
(350,200)
(TsirrnW)
(030, 7UU)
(150,000)
(195,600)
(150,000)
2,095,300
( 093,100)'
(1.602.100)
( 169^800)
1 ( 150,000)
3,282,900
.( 150,000)
( '.09.5001
(1,63G,»00)
( 382,500)
( 551,100)
( 150,000)
1,100,700
c;oi,ioo)
(779,700)
(511,200) .
(520,200)
(205,200)
(.500,900)
V.ViU,loU)
(771,000)
6,123.300
(J_, 103. 100) .
f_J>?A.050) _
(1,22ft, 300)
( 360,300)
(l,C37,/iOO)
,
REGIOH VI
Arkansas
loulciana
New Mexico
Oklahoma
Texan
REGION VII
Joua
Ka noun
J-Ucuouri
Hcbriioka
REGION VHI ,
Colorado
. Montiica-
north Dakota
South JXxkota
UOKIJ
Vyoininc
REGION IX
Arizona
i/ California
31 aval i
J. ova da i
American Samoa
Xn^Jl^Lp.T r i r o r i e s
Guam
REGION X
Alaska
Ic?~:c>
Ore-oc
Vasbln^cn
19KQ
2,057,332
f 125,736^
( 610,000)
( 93,000)-
( 172,791)
(1,U35772T)
721,000
(173,721)
(161,010)
(290,160)
( 937106) '
' -693,108
(100,601)
(106,764)
( UJ.OOU)
( 9 3, -000)
(119, 01 U}
( 93,Ot"HJ)
2,173,110
^ 2 35, 81 8^
(1,172,562)
( 93,000)
( 93,000)
( 93,000)
( 93,000)
( 93,000)
730,156
(160.116)
( J OJ , ("«4 )
(713, J'Vi)
(.f/l.Vi.1)
19B1
1.60»,GOO
.( 20?tOOO)
( 901, OCX))
( 150,000)
( 2/0./00)
(2,993,100)
i; 161. ooo
(200,200)
(265,500)
(16tf,000)
(150,30^7)
1,118,100
(301.700)
(172,200)
(150,000)
(150,000)
(192,000)
(150,'J'JO)
. 3.505,500
( 330,100)
(2,375,100)
( 150,000)
( 15 0,000)
( 150,0001
( 150, «00 i
( 150,000.
1,258,000
( 7'jH. JS)
( 'ITi /(i.
( 1 «.". , i.;ii
TOTA15 (10,600,000) (30,000,0
'"fi'i 600)
-------
TABLE II
Subtitle D State Grants
RSCTOK I
Connecticut
M--ine
M.-r.r.r.clni-'CttS
J.vu Kr_mu5hire
Rhode Inland
Vermont
SK'.TOII IT
)!f;v- Jor.'icy
Jlcw Yorl:
riu:rLo ]{lco
Virp.i n lalcods
RPJT01I ITC
Delaware
]-iury.lunfl
rcnnr:y]vanla '
Virgin ja.
',;<-. t Virginia
-. DIM;. or Co3ximibla
REGION -TV
l-'lorldn '
f;«or>'Jn.
Kr.-ntucKv
IllTiln-.lBTJl'
North ('Carolina
ron1 !x f'nroiina
Tunncr.'.i.-c
RTT.1.0H V
III L no in
i i, UMI.-V
j-i.-hi j-i-.ii
}'. 'i mi'".! il.n.
(to
1QAO
602,800
(140,000)
( 50,000)
(2f>2,«00)
( 50,01)0)
( 50,000)
( ill, 000)
1,348,800
(331,100)
(042,400)
(125,300)
( DO ,000 3
1,121,400
( 50,000)
(181,200)
P'»'»,i>ofi)
: (214,700)
.(.lio,6oii)
( 50,000)
1,471,400
. (159,100)
(313,600)
(?J.2,UOO)
(148,700) .
(102,400)
(234,700}
(119, 700)
i (.181,7.00)
2j 035, 700
(513,400)
(239,900).
(410,000)
. ' " (J 75, 800)
inrti
482.740
(112,000)
( 40,000)
(210,240)
( 40,000)
( /(), 010)
( 40,000)
1,079,040
- (264.880)
(673,920)
(100,740 )
( 40,000) .
897,120 ' '
( 40,000)
044,960)
(435,920)
(171,760) .
( 64,460)
( 40,000)
1,177,120
(.127,280)
(250,880)
(169,600)
(138.960)
( 81,920)
(187, /60)
( 95,760)
(1W7960)
1,628, .160
(410, /20)
(191,920)
I32»7fr0~03
(140,640 )
(jy^.bOiJ)
[ ( /. r '/ion
REGION VI
Arkansas
. 19BO
W 1,1? 00
( i!8,3')f))
TOftl
7 5 3..'* 20
( 71,040)
Louisiana (107,700) (134,160)
Nev Mexico
Oklahoma
Texas
REGION VII
Iowa
Kanoao
Mi en our i
7tebra5ka
REGION VTTI
Colorado
Monte.cc
North Dakota ' ,
South Dakota
Ulmi
Vyoir..1 [IK
. REGION IX
Arizona.
1/Cc.lli'ornie.
Hr.vc.ii
Nevada
American Samoa
Trt'«:E Territories
GU.-MII '
REGION X
Aliiska
Idaho
Oro^oc
Var.Mrsc-tori
( iiv'D'J)
(lllv,?.')0)
(517,200)
510,000
(IJO.iOO)
(103, POO)
(216,000)
( GO.bOO)
352,000
(102,000)
( 50,000)
( 50,000)
( 50,000)
( 50, 000)
. .( i!l,'J(K)3
1,253,600
( 81,800)
(921,800)
( 50,000)
( 50,000)
( 50,000)
( 50,000)
( 50,000)
354,100
( 50,000)
' ( 50,000)
( 96,600)
O57,;iMn)
( /i 0.000)
( 9 4, ><)(} )
(4i:i,/M) )
435,040
/?).',./, 00)
( 83.040)
.. (172,800)
( 54,800)
281, r'°°
(81,600) .
(40,000)
(40,000)
(40,0'JU)
(40,000)
(.VJ/UUUJ
1,002,880
( fi5_/'4fj )
(737 / '' 0 )
C 40^000^
( / 0,000)
( 40,000)
( 40,000)
( 40,000)
203,280
( 40^000)
( 40.000)
( 77.2KT)
(l?fi.tim)_
TOTALS (10,000,000) (R.Onn.Onn)
<\
. 1 '
-------
'i- .h J Li. ..
OPEN I)UMP INVENTORY - FY 80 STATUS
Municipal Landfills
Total Number
No. Permitted
Facility Iflnme
*
Floodplains
Endangered
Species
CRITERIA ELEMENTS
Surface
Water
1
,
Ground
Water
>
M
H
w
-------
TAI'.i.l-J 1.J.J.-0
OPEN DUMP INVENTORY - FY 80 vSTATUiJ
Industrial Landfills
Totnl Number
No. Permitted
Facility Name
f
-- - - k
Floodplains
.
Endangered
Species
CRITERIA ELEMENTS
Surface
Water
Ground
Water
1
.
M
H
-------
TAJj:.i. . j . v.
OPEN PUMP INVENTORY - FY 80 STATUS
Landspreading
Total Number
No. Permitted
Facility Name
f
x
Floodplains
*
Endangered
Species
CRITERIA ELEMENTS
Surface
Water
Ground
Water
\
M
rl
<
.
C
H
CO
JZ
O
i in
o a
0 0
O M
^i U
«
.
Disease
1
Explosive
Gases
V
in
0)
V<
r-<
U*
1
4J
' *4-«
HJ
>-f
O
}-l
f-l
< "V
**. n
o
-------
TAIJLI'. i... , .
OPEK L1UMP INVENTORY - FY 80 STATUS
Surface Impoundments
Total Number
No. Permitted
Facility Name
*
Floodplains
Endangered
Species
CRITERIA ELEMENTS
Surface
Water
Ground
Water
1
»-i
H
<
'
,
a
H
«
JC
o
i m
t3 Q.
0 0
O Lt
P-i O
Disease
-
.
!
0)
r4
(/}
O w
i-4 Q)
CX (A
X 03
WO
i
w
-------
'iAlibi1. * v <>
OPEN DUMI? INVENTORY - FY 81 PROJECTIONS
Municipal Landfills
Total Number
No. Permitted
Facility Name
-
.
Floodplains
Endangered
Species
.
CRITERIA ELEMENTS
Surface
Wacer
'
Ground
Water
-
M
H
<
'
1
c
H
rt
&
o
1 V)
"O CX
o o
O M
Jn 0
1
\
.
i
Disease
i
Explosive
Gases
tn
0)
b
r4
u,
Bird/Aircraft
Hazard
Access
.
:
_-_-_--
Enter - a) Decision in 1'Y 81
b) Data collected and analyzed, but no decision in FY 81
c) Data collected but not analyzed
d) Data to be collected in FY 81
e) No data collccion in FY 81
- 25 -
-------
Lf
OPEN.DVMi; II.".'. 'TORY - FY 81
Iiiduatrial Landfills
Total Number
No. Permitted
Facility Name
.
-
»
Floodplains
,
.
Endangered
Species
CRITERIA ELEMENTS
Surface
Water
1
Ground
Water
M
H
<
,
C
-rl
«
.C
O
1
>-»
^
b
*
' - 1
3ird/Aircraf c j
Hazard
Access
Enter - a) Decision in FY 81
b) Data collected and analyzed, but no decision in FY 81
c) Data collected but not analyzed
d) Data to be collected in FY 81
e) No data collection in FY 81
- 26 -
-------
OPEN -DUMIMNVENTORY - FY
Lands preudinjj
81 PROJECTIONS
Total Number
No. Permitted
Facility Name
*
< J
Floodplains
,
Endangered
Species
,-.__-
CRITERIA ELEMENTS
Surface
Water
o
C M
2
H rt
OJ3
V4
H
<:
c
H
cfl.
^:
0
1 V)
o ex
O 0
O b
(* o
j
.
i
Disease
Explosive
Gases-
Fires
Bird/Aircraft
Hazard
Access
-
Enter - a) Decision in FY 81
b) Data collected and analyzed, but no decision in FY 81
c) Data collected but not analyzed
d) Data to be collected in FY 81
e) No data collection in FY 81
- 27 -
-------
TAJiLli IV-U
OPEN DUMP INVENTORY - FY 81 Projections
Surface Impoundments
Total Number
No. Permitted
Facility Name
.
4
Floodplains
Endangered
Species
,
,
CRITERIA ELEMENTS
Surface
Water
'
Ground
Water
i
M
'rt
<
'
Food-chain
Crops
,
.
,
Disease
i
Explosive
Gases
1
M
0)
M
rH
fc<
Bird/Aircraft
Hazard
.
Access '
1
Enter - a) Decision in FY 81
b) Data collected and .analyzed, hut no decision in FY 81
c) Data collected but not nnniy-.ud
d) Data to be collected in FY 81
c) Mo data collect.Jon in 1-Y 81
-------
REGULATORY POWERS - FY 80 STATUS -<
f*i O
X
X
1
X .
X
X
1
X
Disease
,
Explosive
Gases-
i
i-f
^CIJ
»- x«
t; «u
)J N
ri CD
M W
V
V
c
t
c
«c
Enter -
Remarks:
a) Adequate regulations arc in effect (nee 40 CFR 256.21)
b) Regulations have been drafted but are not in effect
c) Regulations are being drafted in FY 80
d) Regulations arc not being addressed in FY 80
-------
TAliLb vi
REGULA.TO.RY POWERS - FY 81 PROJECTIONS
FACILITY TYPE
1
1. Landfills
a) municipal
b) inclur. trial
on-sitc
c) industrial
off-site
2 . Landsprcading
3. Surface Impoundments
a) Municipal
b) industrial co-site
i
c) industrial olf-oite
Floodplains
Endangered
Species
i
CRITERIA ELEMENTS
Surface
Water
Ground
Water
i
j-i
ri
<
1
Food-chain
Crops
X
i
X
X
X
X
X
Disease
\
Explosive
Gases
W
O
^
H
1*4
\
Bird/Aircraft
Hazard
i
- *
Access . j
Enter -
Remarks:
.1) Adequate rogulntions arc in effect: (see /«0 CFR 256.21)
b) Regulations have been drafted but are not in effect
c) Regulations arc being drafted in FY 81
d) Regulations are not being addressed in FY 81 (explai
ain below)
-------
Appendix A - Definitions of Terns
(for use in completing Tables III-VI)
1. Landfill - A facility for the disposal of solid wastes
involving the placement of solid wastes on or into the
land surface/ and usually involving compaction and covering
w
of the disposed solid wastes.
a) municipal landfill - A landfill- accepting primarily
j*
discarded materials' from residential and commercial
activities.
b) industrial landfill - A landfill accepting primarily
discarded materials from manufacturing activities.
2. Surface Impoundment - A natural topographic depression,
artifical excavation/ or like arrangement used for disposal
of solid wastes, especially liquids and semi-solids. Also
referred to as ponds, pits/ lagoons, and basins.
3. Landspreading - Application of solid waste onto land/or
incorporation into the surface soil, including the use of
such waste as a fertilizer or soil conditioner.
-------
APPENDIX
B
32
------- |