WATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH SERIES • 16080 GPF 04/71
          Corrosion  Potential  of NTA
                       in
            Detergent Formulations
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY • WATER QUALITY OFFICE

-------
               WATER POLLUTION CONTROL RESEARCH SERIES
The Water Pollution Control Research Reports describe the results and
progress in the control and abatement of pollution in our Nation's waters.
They provide a central source of information on the research,  development,
and demonstration activities in the Water Quality Office, in the
Environmental Protection Agency, through inhouse research and grants and
contracts with Federal, State, and local agencies, research institutions,
and industrial organizations.

Inquiries pertaining to Water Pollution Control Research Reports should be
directed to the Head, Project Reports System, Planning and Resources
Office, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency,
Water Quality Office, Room 1108, Washington, D. C.  20242.

 - about our cover

   The cover illustration depicts a city in which man's activities coexist
   in harmony with the natural environment.  The Water Quality Control
   Research Program has as its objective the development of the water
   quality control technology that will make such cities possible.
   Previously issued reports on the Water Quality Control Research
   Program include:

   Report Number                        Title

   16080	06/69    Hydraulic and Mixing Characteristics of Suction
                      Manifolds

   16080—-10/69    Nutrient Removal from Enriched Waste Effluent by
                      the Hydroponic Culture of Cool Season Grasses

   16080DRX10/69    Stratified Reservoir Currents

   16080	11/69    Nutrient Removal from Cannery Wastes by Spray
                      Irrigation of Grassland

   16080DVF07/70    Development of Phosphate-free Home Laundry Detergents

   16080	10/70    Induced Hypolimnion Aeration for Water Quality
                      Improvement of Power Releases

   16080DWP11/70    Induced Air Mixing of Large Bodies of Polluted Water

-------
   CORROSION POTENTIAL OF NTA IN DETERGENT FORMULATIONS
                            for the
                   WATER  QUALITY OFFICE


             ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                  Project  No. 16080-GPP
                  Contract No. 14-12-9^3
                       April, 1971
                         BATTELLE
                  Columbus Laboratories
                     505 King Avenue
                  Columbus, Ohio   *I3201
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1.00
                          Stock Number 5901-0093

-------
             EPA Review Notice
This report has been reviewed by the Water
Quality Office, EPA, and approved for publication.
Approval does not signify that the contents
necessarily reflect the views and policies of
the Environmental Protection Agency, nor does
mention of trade names or commercial products
constitute endorsement or recommendation for
use.

-------
                             ABSTRACT
Laboratory studies were conducted to determine the corrosion potential
of nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) as a substitute for sodium tripolyphosphate
(STPP) in detergents.  Coupon-weight loss and linear polarization studies
were employed to investigate the corrosion of typical materials of con-
struction which might be subject to exposure to NTA in normal use in
laundering.

Detergent formulations used were representative of heavy-duty granular
detergents.  Solutions of 0.06, 0.12, and 0.18 weight percent using 15
and 150 ppm water hardness and temperatures of 130 and 160 F represented
laundering conditions used by the average housewife.

NTA-based detergents were more corrosive by a factor between 1 and 7 to
the materials:  1100 Aluminum, 260 Brass, electrolytic copper, die-cast
zinc, 1020 carbon steel and chemical lead.  Corrosion was generally great-
est in NTA and STPP solutions with soft water.  In both soft and hard
waters, corrosivity increased with increase of detergent concentration.

Types 304 and 420 stainless steel and 201 Nickel were very corrosion re-
sistant (0.01 to 0.15 mil per year), 260 Brass, electrolytic copper and
1100 Aluminum were moderately resistant  (0.2 to 3 mils per year) and die-
cast zinc, 1020 carbon steel and chemical lead poorly corrosion resistant
at rates of 2 to 60 mils per year.  Cast iron showed extreme corrosion in
NTA solutions with corrosion rates between 30 and 120 mils per year.  NTA
detergents could increase metal ion pickup at a sewage plant by a factor
between 1 and 7.

This report was submitted in fulfillment of Project Number 16080 GPF,
Contract 14-12-943, under the sponsorship of the Water Quality Office,
Environmental Protection Agency.
Key Words:

corrosion, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP),
detergents,  laundering materials, cast-iron sewer pipe, metal-ion pickup,
pollution, coupon-weight loss, linear polarization.
                                111

-------
                            CONTENTS
Section




  I       Historical Perspective




  II      Conclusions




  III     Recommendations




  IV      Introduction




  V       Discussion of the Problem




  VI      Materials




  VII     Experimental Procedures




  VIII    Experimental Results




  IX      Discussion




  X       Acknowledgments




  XI      References




  XII     Glossary




  XIII    Appendix
Page




 1




 2




 4




 5




 6




 8




 10




 18




 76




 81




 82




 83




 85

-------
                               FIGURES
                                                                     PAGE
 1    TYPICAL TUBE SET UPS FOR (a) 130 F and (b) 160 F CORROSION       12
      STUDIES

 2    ELECTRODE FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL MEASUREMENTS                       16

 3    ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL LINEAR POLARIZATION       16
      MEASUREMENTS

 4    SCHEMATIC OF LINEAR POLARIZATION MEASUREMENTS                    17

 5    CORROSION RATE OF 1100 ALUMINUM AS A FUNCTION OF DETERGENT       21
      CONCENTRATION IN 15-PPM AND 150-PPM WATER HARDNESS AT 130 F

 6    CORROSION RATE OF 1100 ALUMINUM AS A FUNCTION OF STPP AND NTA    22
      CONCENTRATION AT (a) 15-PPM AND (b) 150-PPM WATER HARDNESS AND
      130 F

7a    CORROSION RATE OF 1100 ALUMINUM AS A FUNCTION OF EXPOSURE TIME   24
      AT 130 F IN 15-PPM HARDNESS SOLUTIONS AND USE OF THE LINEAR
      POLARIZATION METHOD

7b    CORROSION RATE OF 1100 ALUMINUM AS A FUNCTION OF EXPOSURE TIME   25
      AT 130 F IN 150-PPM HARDNESS SOLUTIONS AND USE OF THE LINEAR
      POLARIZATION METHOD

 8    CROSS SECTION OF DEZINCIFIED COUPON B14                          28

 9    CORROSION RATE OF 260 BRASS AS A FUNCTION OF DETERGENT CON-      29
      CENTRATION IN 15-PPM AND 150-PPM WATER HARDNESS AT 130 F

10    CORROSION RATE OF 260 BRASS AS A FUNCTION OF STPP AND NTA        30
      CONCENTRATION AT (a) 15-PPM AND (b) 150-PPM WATER HARDNESS
      AND 130 F

11    CORROSION RATE OF 260 BRASS AS A FUNCTION OF EXPOSURE TIME AT    31
      130 F AND USE OF THE LINEAR POLARIZATION METHOD

12    CORROSION RATE OF ELECTROLYTIC COPPER AS A FUNCTION OF DETER-    36
      GENT CONCENTRATION IN 15-PPM AND 150-PPM WATER HARDNESS AT
      130 F

13    CORROSION RATE OF ELECTROLYTIC COPPER AS A FUNCTION OF STPP AND  37
      NTA CONCENTRATION AT (a) 15-PPM AND (b) 150-PPM WATER HARDNESS
      AND 130 F

14    CORROSION RATE OF ELECTROLYTIC COPPER AS A FUNCTION OF EXPOSURE  38
      TIME AT 130 F AND USE OF THE LINEAR POLARIZATION METHOD
                                 vi

-------
                          FIGURES continued

                                                                     PAGE


15    DIE-CAST ZINC COUPON D34 AFTER EXPOSURE                         42

16    DIE-CAST ZINC COUPON  D29 AFTER EXPOSURE                        42

17    DIE-CAST ZINC COUPON D45 AFTER EXPOSURE                         42

18    DIE-CAST ZINC COUPON D43 AFTER EXPOSURE                         42

19    CROSS SECTION OF PITTED AREA IN COUPON D18                      43

20    CROSS SECTION OF PITTED AREA IN COUPON Dl4                      43

21    CORROSION RATE OF DIE-CAST ZINC AS A FUNCTION OF DETERGENT      44
      CONCENTRATION IN 15-PPM AND 150-PPM WATER HARDNESS AT 130 F

22a   CORROSION RATE OF DIE-CAST ZINC AS A FUNCTION OF STPP AND NTA   45
      CONCENTRATION AT 15-PPM WATER HARDNESS AND 130 F

22b   CORROSION RATE OF DIE-CAST ZINC AS A FUNCTION OF STPP AND NTA   46
      CONCENTRATION AT 150-PPM WATER HARDNESS AND 130 F

23    CORROSION RATE OF DIE-CAST ZINC AS A FUNCTION OF EXPOSURE TIME  48
      IN (a) 15-PPM AND (b) 150-PPM HARDNESS SOLUTIONS AT 130 F AND
      USE OF LINEAR POLARIZATION METHOD

24    CORROSION RATE OF 201 NICKEL AS A FUNCTION OF EXPOSURE TIME     49
      AT 130 F AND USE OF THE LINEAR POLARIZATION METHOD

25    CORROSION RATE OF TYPE 304 STAINLESS STEEL AS A FUNCTION OF     51
      EXPOSURE TIME IN (a) 15-PPM AND  (b) 150-PPM HARDNESS  SOLUTIONS AT
      130 F AND USE OF THE LINEAR POLARIZATION METHOD

26    CORROSION RATE OF TYPE 420 STAINLESS STEEL AS A FUNCTION OF     52
      EXPOSURE TIME IN (a) 15-PPM AND (b) 150-PPM HARDNESS SOLUTIONS
      AT 130 F AND USE OF THE LINEAR POLARIZATION METHOD

27    1020 CARBON STEEL COUPON H26 AFTER EXPOSURE                     56

28    1020 CARBON STEEL COUPON H41 AFTER EXPOSURE                     56

29    1020 CARBON STEEL COUPON H27 AFTER EXPOSURE                     56

30    1020 CARBON STEEL COUPON H46 AFTER EXPOSURE                     56

31    CORROSION RATE OF 1020 CARBON STEEL AS A FUNCTION OF STPP AND   57
      NTA CONCENTRATION AT 15-PPM AND 150-PPM WATER HARDNESS AND
      130 F
                                vii

-------
                          FIGURES continued
                                                                   PAGE

32a   CORROSION RATE OF 1020 CARBON STEEL AS A FUNCTION OF STPP     58
      AND NTA CONCENTRATION AT 15-PPM WATER HARDNESS AND 130 F

32b   CORROSION RATE OF 1020 CARBON STEEL AS A FUNCTION OF STPP     59
      AND NTA CONCENTRATION AT 150-PPM WATER HARDNESS AND 130 F

33    CORROSION RATE OF 1020 CARBON STEEL AS A FUNCTION OF EXPOSURE 60
      TIME IN (a) 15-PPM AND (b)  150-PPM HARDNESS SOLUTIONS AT
      130 F AND USE OF THE LINEAR POLARIZATION METHOD

34    CHEMICAL LEAD COUPON L26 (a) BEFORE AND (b) AFTER EXPOSURE    61

35    CORROSION RATE OF CHEMICAL LEAD AS A FUNCTION OF DETERGENT    64
      CONCENTRATION IN 15-PPM AND 150-PPM WATER HARDNESS AT 130 F

36    CORROSION RATE OF CHEMICAL LEAD AS A FUNCTION OF STPP AND     65
      NTA CONCENTRATION AT (a) 15-PPM AND (b) 150-PPM WATER
      HARDNESS AND 130 F

37    CORROSION RATE OF CHEMICAL LEAD AS A FUNCTION OF EXPOSURE     66
      TIME IN (a) 15-PPM AND (b)  150-PPM HARDNESS SOLUTIONS AT
      130 F AND USE OF THE LINEAR POLARIZATION METHOD

38    CAST-IRON COUPONS (a) M4 AND (b) M8 AFTER EXPOSURE            70

39    CROSS SECTION OF COUPON Ml                                    71

40    CROSS SECTION OF COUPON MlO                                   71

41    CORROSION RATE OF CAST IRON AS A FUNCTION OF STPP AND NTA     73
      CONCENTRATION AT 15-PPM AND 150-PPM WATER HARDNESS AND
      130 F
                                viii

-------
                             TABLES


Number                                                               Page

   1     Nominal Composition of Metals                                 8

   2     Coupon Identification                                        11

   3     Coupon Descaling Procedures                                  13

   4     Coupon-Corrosion-Rate Factors                                14

   5     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for 1100 Aluminum in 50              19
         Weight-Percent STPP-Based Detergents

   6     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for 1100 Aluminum in 50              20
         Weight-Percent NTA-Based Detergents

   7     Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions              23
         Over STPP Solutions with 1100 Aluminum

   8     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for 260 Brass in 50                  26
         Weight-Percent STPP-Based Detergents

   9     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for 260 Brass in 50                  27
         Weight-Percent NTA-Based Detergents

   10     Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions              32
         Over STPP Solutions with 260 Brass

   11     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Electrolytic Copper in           33
         50 Weight-Percent STPP-Based Detergents

   12     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Electrolytic Copper in           34
         50 Weight-Percent NTA-Based Detergents

   13     Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions Over         35
         STPP Solutions with Electrolytic Copper

   14     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Die-Cast Zinc in 50              40
         Weight-Percent STPP-Based Detergents

   15     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Die-Cast Zinc in 50 Weight-      41
         Percent NTA-Based Detergents

   16     Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions Over         47
         STPP Solutions with Die-Cast Zinc

   17     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for 1020 Carbon Steel in 50          54
         Weight-Percent STPP-Based Detergents

-------
                        TABLES continued

Number                                                        Page

  18     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for 1020 Carbon Steel in       55
         50 Weight-Percent NTA-Based Detergents

  19     Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions        53
         Over STPP Solutions with 1020 Carbon Steel

  20     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Chemical Lead in 50-       62
         Weight-Percent STPP-Based Detergents

  21     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Chemical Lead in 50        63
         Weight-Percent NTA-Based Detergents

  22     Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions        67
         Over STPP Solution With Chemical Lead

  23     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Cast Iron Soil Pipe in     68
        ,STPP and NTA-Based Detergents

  24     Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Cast Iron Soil Pipe in     69
         Soiled STPP and NTA-Based Detergents

  25     Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions Over    72
         STPP Solutions with Cast Iron

  26     Summary of Data for Preparation of Soiled Detergent     74
         Solutions

  27     Specific Resistivity and pH Data for Detergent         77
         Solutions at Room Temperature

  28     Summary of Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA       7,8
         Solutions over Corresponding STPP Solutions
                                x

-------
                            SECTION I
                     HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
This report presents the results of a research project first initiated
in mid 1970.  At that time, nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) was being em-
ployed increasingly as a phosphate substitute in detergents.  Due to the
lack of published data on the corrosion behavior of NTA, some concern was
realized for its use as a phosphate substitute in detergents.  The con-
cern led to this research project on the corrosion behavior of materials
commonly used in laundering in NTA-based detergents.

The experimental work on this project began in September, 1970, prior to
the statement by the Environmental Protection Agency Administrator,
William D. Ruckelhaus and Surgeon General Jesse L. Steinfeld on December
18, 1970, concerning the use of NTA.  In this statement, which is repro-
duced in full in Appendix A, the detergent manufacturers were commended
for their voluntary action to discontinue the use of NTA.  The discontin-
uation was based upon work conducted by the National Institute of Environ-
mental Health Sciences (NIEHS).  The results of this work indicated a
significant increase in embryo toxicity and congenital abnormalities in
rats and mice injected with dosages of two heavy metals (cadmium and
methyl mercury) simultaneously with NTA compared to results with the same
dosage of the metals alone.  As indicated in the statement, other studies
by both the industry and within the Government were underway at that time
for further evaluation of NTA.  The present work was allowed to continue
as part of the further evaluation of this chemical.

-------
                           SECTION II
                           CONCLUSIONS
The following major conclusions have been drawn concerning the effects of
nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA)-based detergents upon materials used in
laundering and in a sewer system as well as the metal-ion pickup in a
sewage-treatment operation.   These conclusions related to the use of
detergent formulations based upon NTA and sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP)
contents typical of heavy-duty granular detergents at concentrations used
by the average housewife in hot water washes at 130 and 160 F with soft
(15 ppm hardness) and hard (150 ppm hardness) water.

1.  NTA-based detergent solutions were almost always more corrosive to the
materials:  1100 Aluminum, 260 Brass, electrolytic copper, die-cast zinc,
1020 carbon steel and chemical lead than the corresponding STPP-based
detergent solutions.

2.  Corrosion was generally greatest in soft-water solutions and increased
with increase of detergent concentration in both soft and hard water.

3.  The increased corrosivity of NTA solutions over STPP solutions ranged
between a factor of 1 to 7 and increased in the following order:  1100
Aluminum, chemical lead, electrolytic copper, die-cast zinc, 260 Brass,
1020 carbon steel, and uncoated cast-iron soil pipe.

4.  Cast-iron soil-pipe material in the uncoated condition was not corrosion
resistant to either NTA or STPP-based detergent solutions, with corrosion
rates of 44 to 84 mils per year over extended periods of time.  In general,
the corrosion rates in the NTA solutions were higher than in corresponding
STPP solutions by a factor varying between 1.6 to 6.7.

5.  The materials used in laundering could be classified into the groups
(a) very corrosion resistant; i.e., Types 304 and 420 stainless steel  and
201 nickel (corrosion rates of 0.01 to 0.15 mil per year), (b) moderately
corrosion resistant; i.e., 260 Brass, electrolytic copper and 1100 Aluminum
(corrosion rates of 0.2 to 3 mils per year), (c) poor corrosion resistance;
i.e., die-cast zinc, 1020 carbon steel, and chemical lead (corrosion rates
of 2 to 60 mils per year) and (d) extremely poor corrosion resistance  as
exhibited by cast iron at rates between 16 and 120 mils per year.

6.  Corrosion was usually of a general, even nature but excpptions were
die-cast zinc which exhibited mostly pitting corrosion, the 1020 carbon
steel which exhibited a measurable amount of localized corrosion, and
brass which exhibited dezincification in some STPP-based solutions.

7.  Weight-loss data were more reliable than those from the electrochemical
linear polarization method with the possible exception of 1020 carbon steel,
Types 304 and 420 stainless steel, and 201 Nickel.  This was due to the
probably related formation of films which produced a low assessment of
corrosion rate by the electrochemical method.

-------
8.  Increase of detergent solution temperatures from 130 to 160 F had
marginal effects on the corrosion behavior of the laundering construction
materials.

-------
                           SECTION III
                         RECOMMENDATIONS
These studies have indicated that NTA-based detergent formulations are
more corrosive to most common laundering materials than the corresponding
STPP-based detergent formulations.  Therefore,  caution should be exercised
in the choice of materials with which they are  to be used.   It should be
recognized that the NTA formulations in the absence of corrosion inhibi-
tors, could give rise to as much as 7 times more metal-ion pick up in a
sewage plant operation than for corresponding STPP formulations and thus
methods for additional metal-ion removal need to be considered.

Due to the recent voluntary removal of NTA from detergent formulations,
the current interest in these detergent formulations as possible aggressive
corrodents has decreased.  However, a variety of detergent formulations
based upon soda ash, silicates, borax, polyelectrolytes,  or mixtures with
other minor ingredients are now available as "phosphate free" and "NTA
free" detergents.  These formulations needed to be studied with regard
to corrosion behavior of laundering materials in the same manner as for
NTA.  After discussion with detergent manufacturers, it is also apparent
that porcelain ceramic should be added to the list of laundering materials
since it is commonly employed and is not inert  to corrosion in detergent
solutions as might be anticipated.

-------
                           SECTION IV
                          INTRODUCTION
The world-wide production of detergents and cleaning agents reached an
estimated 9.7 million metric tons (21,340 pounds) in 1969,  up 8 percent
from. 19681.   About 25 percent or 2.4 million metric tons (5,280 pounds}
was produced in the USA.   Detergents and cleaning agents may contain(*)
between 1 and 74 weight percent phosphates as sodium tripolyphosphate
(STPP).   Since it has been feared that phosphates contribute to eutro-
phication of the Nation's lakes and streams, concern has arisen over the
presence of phosphates in these products.  Although it is asserted that
many other materials can stimulate eutrophication, detergent producers
have searched for a substitute for STPP in detergents and cleaning agents.
As indicated by a state-of-the-art report (Appendix B),  a substitute to
replace all STPP's attributes as a detergent 'builder' has been difficult
to find but some success was achieved with sodium nitrilotriacetic acid
(NTA) as a partial replacement.  Detergents, therefore,  became  available
to the housewife which contained partial replacement of the STPP content
with NTA.  As much as 25 percent replacement of the STPP content with NTA
was reported for some products.

A complete lack of corrosion data in the open literature as evidenced by
a state-of-the-art report (Appendix B) indicated a need for an understanding
of the corrosion behavior of NTA-based detergents.  The corrosion behavior
of these detergents was particularly required with respect to their effect
upon

         (1) Materials of construction employed in laundering •
         (2) Materials of construction of a sewer system
         (3) The metal-ion pickup in a sewage treatment operation.

This report describes the results of experimental work conducted to determine
these effects.
   Effective February 1, 1971, Chicago has regulated all laundry detergents
   to not contain more than 8.7 percent phosphorous (about 34 weight percent
   STPP).  The House Government Operations Committee's panel on resources
   has recommended that phosphate be removed from detergents by 1972.

-------
                           SECTION V
                    DISCUSSION OF THE PROBLEM
Hard waters are generally less corrosive to metals than soft waters since
deposited mineral scales from hard waters retard the corrosion processes.
The addition of a detergent to the water makes it less hard and,  therefore,
generally more corrosive.  In typical detergents, the STPP or NTA builders
sequester the calcium and magnesium ions and render the water less hard.
The sequestering power of the builders can also lead to attack of scale
on metals thay may have already been present and thus present the oppor-
tunity for corrosion.  The sequestration of metal ions by STPP or NTA
disturbs the metal/metal ion equilibrium and leads to increased metal
dissolution.  On the other hand, phosphates can promote phosphate films
on some metal surfaces which can provide some protection.  As described
later (Appendix B), the greater sequestering ability of NTA over  STPP
coupled with a greater buffering capacity indicated a need for some con-
cern of the corrosion behavior of NTA-based detergents toward metals.

The concern for corrosion of materials used in laundering indicated a
need for the study of the following metals:

                         1100 Aluminum
                         260 (or 70/30) Brass
                         electrolytic copper
                         die-cast zinc
                         201 Nickel
                         Type 304 stainless steel
                         Type 420 stainless steel
                         1020 carbon steel
                         chemical lead

In addition to the above metals, there was a need to study the corrosion
behavior of cast-iron soil pipe employed in sewer systems.

Discussions were conducted with representatives of a leading detergent
producer to determine detergent formulations, detergent solution  concen-
trations, and temperatures most representative of laundering conditions.
The following facts were obtained and utilized in establishing the experi-
mental program.

1.  As there is an insufficient difference in the chemical makeup of hot
and cold water-type detergents, linear alkyl sulfonate (LAS)-based granular
detergents suffice for evaluation purposes.

It was believed, therefore, that corrosion studies needed to be conducted
in a typical LAS-based granular detergent formulation such as:

                         50 weight percent STPP
                         20 weight percent LAS
                         18 weight percent fillers
                          6 weight percent sodium silicate
                            (1.6:1 Si02 to Na20 ratio)
                          6 weight percent water

-------
in which (a)  no STPP was replaced,  (b) all STPP was replaced with NTA,
and (c) 25 percent of the STPP was  replaced by NTA.  It was intended that
such formulations would not include the presence of corrosion inhibitors,
fluorescents,  antitarnishing agents,  brighteners, etc., since such additions
would not relate to all types of detergents.

2.  One cup (76g) of detergent powder per 17-gallon washing machine, which
corresponds to a 0.12 weight percent detergent concentration, is normally
employed by the housewife.

It appeared,  therefore, that solution concentrations of 0.06, 0.12, and 0.18
weight percent were required to be studied as related to under average,
average, and above average detergent strengths.

3.  The average hot-water wash is about 130 F but a minority employ 160 F.
Solutions entering the drain are normally about  115 to 120 F.

These  figures indicated that the majority of studies should be conducted
at  130 F but that some evaluations should also be made at 160 F.  The
temperature of 130 F also appeared applicable for studies relating to
temporary conditions in a sewer system drain pipe.

4.  The hardness of the water is critical.  It was believed^ therefore,
that hard and soft water  conditions needed  to be evaluated and that 150 ppm
and 15 ppm of simulated water hardness wou}.d typify these conditions
respectively.

In summary, therefore, a  research program was established to employ a 50-
weight percent STPP-based detergent with (a) no  STPP replacement,  (b) all
STPP replaced by NTA,  and (c) 25 percent of STPP replaced by NTA at three
detergent concentrations  of  0.06, 0.12, and 0.18 weight percent using
waters of  15 and  150 ppm  hardness and temperatures of  130 and 160 F.

Coupon Weight-loss data was  considered the  most  reliable method of corrosion
evaluation of  the metals  since electrochemical data in such environments
is very  limited.  Coupon  weight-loss  data was, therefore, used as  the major
evaluation method.  However,  it was  considered that limited electrochemical
"linear  polarization"  studies could  possibly aid evaluation due to  its
faster measuring ability  and more sensitivity  to low corrosion rates.

-------
                           SECTION VI


                            MATERIALS


Metals

All metals employed in the corrosion research program were obtained from
commercial vendors.  Thus, the metals were representative of materials
employed commercially in everyday use.  The nominal chemical composition
of the metals are given in Table 1.  The cast-iron material was obtained
from an unused section of common soil pipe employed in a sewer system;
the determined chemical composition of the cast iron is also included in
Table 1.

             Table 1.  Nominal Composition of Metals


	Metal	Composition, weight percent^a)	

1100 Aluminum        99.00 Al min., 1.0 Fe plus Si max, 0.20 Cu max,
                      0.05 Mn max, 0.10 Zn max

1020 Carbon Steel    0.18-0.23 C, 0.30-0.60 Mn, 0.040 P max, 0.050 S max,
                      remainder Fe
Type 304 Stainless   0.08 C min, 1.0 Mn max, 1.0 Si max, 18.0-20.0 Cr,
 Steel                8.0-12.0 Ni, remainder Fe

Type 420 Stainless   0.15 C min, 1.0 Mn max, 1.0 Si max, 12.0-14.0 Cr,
 Steel                remainder Fe
201 Nickel^        99.5 Ni, 0.01 C, 0.20 Mn, 0.15 Fe, 0.05 Si, 0.05 Cu,
                      0.005 S

Electrolytic Copper  99.95 Cu, 0.04 0
         (c\
260 Brassv '         68.5-71.5 Cu, 0.07 Pb max, 0.05 Fe max, remainder Zn
Die-Cast Zinc        0.25 Cu max, 3.5-4.3 Al, 0.03-0.08 Mg, 0.007 Pb  max,
                      0.005 Cd max, 0.005 Sn max, remainder Zn

Chemical Lead        99.90 Pb min

Cast Iron            3.50 C, 2.02 Si, 0.42 P, 0.38 Mn, 0.13 S, remainder Fe

(a) Metals Handbook, Volume 1, Properties and Selection, ASM, Ohio (1961).
(b) INCO Nickel Number 201.
(c) Copper Alloy Number 260, also termed 70/30 Brass or Cartridge Brass.


Detergent Ingredients

Basic chemical ingredients, as used in the preparation of typical heavy-
duty type granular detergents, were obtained from a leading detergent
manufacturer.

A linear alkyl sulfonate (LAS) solution containing 27.4 weight percent
LAS, 24.1 weight percent fillers and 48.5 weight percent water together
with a sodium silicate solution containing 43 weight percent sodium
silicate (SiC2 : Na£0 weight ratio of 1.6) and 57 weight percent water
were used as a base in all detergent formulations.

                                8

-------
Sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP) as obtained from the detergent manufacturer
was found to be 93.3 percent pure based upon its sodium ion content for the
salt Na5P30io-   Impurities were identified at the following levels (as
parts per million by weight):

                    Cl 	K   Be   Mg   Ca.   Fe   Si
            (ppm)  820 500   10    5    2    1    1

Sodium nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) as obtained from government sources was
a mixture of commercial products.  The mixture was found to be 100 percent
based upon carbon, nitrogen, and the salt CgHsOyNNas; i.e., the trisodium
monohydrate salt N(CH2COONa)3 • 1H20.  The sodium ion content indicated
the presence of a small amount of free alkali in the salt.  Impurities
were identified at the following levels (as parts per million by weight):

                    Cl  _K  	B   Fe   Mg   Ca   Si
             (ppm)  10  10  <10    5    2    1   <1

-------
                           SECTION VII
                     EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
Solution Preparation

As discussed in an earlier section, all detergent solutions used in
corrosion studies were based on the basic granular detergent formulation:

           50 weight percent total of STPP or NTA or both
           20 weight percent LAS
           18 weight percent fillers
            6 weight percent sodium silicate (1.6:lSiO,, to NaoO ratio)
            6 weight percent water

From the supplied LAS solution (27.4 weight percent weight percent LAS,
24.1 weight percent fillers and 48.5 weight percent water), sodium silicate
solution (43 weight percent sodium silicate, 57 weight percent water),  STPP
and NTA salts, 2 weight percent stock solutions of the following detergent
formulations were prepared using distilled water.

     Stock Solution 'A' - 2 Weight Percent of 50 Weight Percent
     STPP-Based Detergent

                50 weight percent STPP
                20 weight percent LAS
                18 weight percent fillers
                 6 weight percent sodium silicate (1.6:1 SiO_ to Na20 ratio)
                 6 weight percent water
     Stock Solution 'B' - 2 Weight Percent of 50 Weight Percent NTA-
     Based Detergent
                50 weight percent NTA
                20 weight percent LAS
                18 weight percent fillers
                 6 weight percent sodium silicate (1.6:1 Si02 to Na^O ratio)
                 6 weight percent water
     Stock Solution 'C' - 2 Weight Percent Solution of 37.5 Weight Percent
     STPP - 12.5 Weight Percent NTA-Based Detergent

                37.5 weight percent STPP
                12.5 weight percent NTA
                18 weight percent fillers
                 6 weight percent sodium silicate (1.6:1 Si02 to Na 0 ratio)
                 6 weight percent water

150 ml aliquots of 0.06, 0.12,  and 0.18 weight percent solutions were pre-
pared for corrosion studies from the above 2 weight percent stock solutions
by dilution of 4.5, 9.0, and 13.5 ml samples to 150 mils respectively.   The
dilutions were made with water of either 15 or 150 ppm hardness.
                                10

-------
The waters of 15 and 150 pptn hardness were prepared as stock solutions
from a 3:1 mixture of CaClo to MgClo in distilled water.

Corrosion-Coupon Preparation and Exposure

Coupons of size 2 x 3/4 in. and thickness between 0.020 and 0.125 in. for
the various metals were prepared for the corrosion studies.  The coupons
contained a 1/4 in.-diameter hole near one end.  Coupons were abraded to a
'400' metallographic paper finish with the exception of 1100 Aluminum
coupons which were abraded to a '600' metallographic paper finish.  Each
coupon was stamped with an identifying letter and number according to the
following designation (Table 2).
                 Table 2.  Coupon Identification
               Metal
Identifying Coupon Letter
        1100 Aluminum
        260 Brass
        Electrolytic Copper
        Die-Cast Zinc
        Nickel
        Type 304 Stainless Steel
        Type 420 Stainless Steel
        1020 Carbon Steel
        Chemical Lead
        Cast Iron
          A
          B
          C
          D
          E
          F
          G
          H
          L
          M
 Prior  to  exposure,  the  coupons were degreased with acetone and weighed to
 the  nearest  0.1 mg.

 Corrosion coupons  were  exposed to  detergent  formulations  in  16-in.  long x
 1-1/4-in.  diameter tubes.  A  typical  tube  setup  is shown  in  Figure  la  for
 the  130 F temperature  studies and  in  Figure  Ib for the  160 F temperature
 studies.   In both  setups,  two coupons were supported  on glass hooks attached
 to a central glass tube.   The glass tube,  in addition to  aiding  support
 of the coupons, allowed the  introduction of  compressed  air into  the tubes
 for  continuous aeration and mild agitation of the solutions.  Outlets
 were provided at the top of  the tubes for  the air.  As  shown in  Figure Ib
 the  tubes for 160  F temperature studies included water  condensers to
 prevent the  loss of solution  due to evaporation.  Condensers were not
 required  for the studies at  130 F.  Each tube employed  150 ml of detergent
 solution  which was sufficient to cover the coupons by several inches.
                                 11

-------
         P716
                    a                      b

 FIGURE 1.  TYPICAL TUBE SETUPS FOR (a) 130 F and (b) 160 F CORROSION STUDIES
Temperature was controlled at 130 and 160 F by containing the tubes within
aluminum blocks (18 x 18 x 18 in.)-   The aluminum blocks contained cylindrical
holes to support the tubes in an upright position with about 4 inches of
the tubes exposed above the top of the blocks.  Heating of the blocks was
readily conducted by attachment of bar heating elements to the sides of the
blocks.   The temperatures of the solustions were, therefore, readily con-
trolled to within ±1F using standard temperature-control units.

Coupons were exposed for 2, 5, 11, and 14 days,  depending upon the metal,
and in all cases the solutions were continuously aerated by the bubbling
through of air which also provided mild agitation.  To prevent contamination
of solutions with other metals, special attention was made to use each tube
with only one type of metal under study.
Coupon Descaling and Corrosion Evaluation

To evaluate corrosion of coupons by weight- loss,  it was necessary to descale
the exposed specimens.   Many of the adopted descaling procedures were
recommended practice. ^  The procedures are outlined in Table 3.

-------
             Table  3.   Coupon-Descaling Procedures
      Metal
     Descaling Procedure
Number of
Treatments
Blank, tag/
treatment
1100 Aluminum


260 Brass




Electrolytic Copper

Die-Cast Zinc



1020 Carbon Steel
Chemical Lead
Cast Iron
2-minute immersion in 75        1
 weight percent HNO^
3-minute immersion in. 10        1
 weight percent 112804. Light
 scrub with bristle brush
 under running water.

3-minute immersion in 10        1
 weight percent ILjSO^
10-minute immersion in 10       2
 weight percent NH^Cl at
 140 F.  Scrub with bristle
 brush under running water.
10-minute immersion in 15.5     2
 volume percent I^PO^ inhibited
 with 1.55 volume percent Rodine
 82-A (AmChem Products, Inc.)
 at 140 F.  Scrub with bristle
 brush under running water.
5-minute immersion in 5         3
 weight percent ammonium
 acetate at 140 F. Scrub
 with bristle brush under
 running water.
2-minute immersion in 15.5      2
 volume percent HoPO/ inhibited
 with 1.55 volume percent Rodine
 82-A (AmChem Products, Inc.)
 at room temperature.  Scrub
 with bristle brush under
 running water.
                   < 0.1


                     0.2




                     0.2


                     0.8




                     0.8
                     2.0
                     1.9
As seen from Table 3, blanks were generally small but did allow correction
for metal loss during descaling procedures.  After descaling, the coupons
were rinsed with water, washed with acetone, dried and reweighed to determine
weight loss.
                               13

-------
                                                          2
The corrosion rates in terms of milligrams per (decimeter)  per day
(mdd) were determined from the weight-loss data using the relationship
                    „  . JJN   100 W                                 ...
                    CR (mdd) = — —                                 (1)

where CR (mdd) = corrosion rate in mdd
             W = weight loss in mg
             A = total coupon area in cm
             T = duration of exposure in days.

The corrosion rate in mdd was converted to corrosion rate expressed  in
mils penetration per year (mpy) according to the relationship
                    CR (mpy) = 3.94 x 1(T3 CR (mdd) = °'^* W       (2)
                                                        ATD
where CR  (mpy) = corrosion rate in mpy
             D = density in g/cm3.
Table 4 gives the areas of the various metal coupons, the density of the
metals and the conversion factors from mdd to mpy.  The difference in
area between the coupons was due to the difference in sheet thickness of
the metals.

After descaling procedures had been completed and corrosion rates calcu-
lated, the coupons were examined metallographically.
             Table 4.  Coupon-Corrosion-Rate Factors
Metal
1100 Aluminum
260 Brass
Electrolytic Copper
Die-Cast Zinc
1020 Carbon Steel
Chemical Lead
Cast Iron
Coupon Area,
cm
19.42
19.79
19.79
21.35
19.95
-21.17
20.85
Density,
g/cm3
2.72
8.52
8.94
7.13
7.85
11.33
7.20
Multiply mdd By These Factors
To Obtain mpy
0.528
0.169
0.161
0.202
0.183
0.127
0.183
Electrode Preparation and Electrochemical Measurements

A  limited number of electrochemical corrosion-rate studies have been con-
ducted in the detergent formulations to establish corrosion rates on the
less-corrosive materials and to determine the dependency of corrosion rate
upon exposure time.  For these studies, electrodes of the metals, tabulated
in Table 1, were prepared.  The corrosion rates were determined using the
linear polarization method.
                                14

-------
Electrodes for the electrochemical studies were prepared using Ko Id-Weld
Resin (Precision Dental Manufacturing Company,  Chicago,  Illinois).   Coupons
2 x 3/4 in.  were mechanically attached to a copper rod and the assembly
placed in a  mould from which electrodes,  as shown in Figure 2, were cast
using the cold-setting resin.  The exposed area of the electrodes was
9/8 in.2 (7.2 cm2).  Duplicate electrodes were  used with electrode areas
facing each other 1 in. apart in 250-ml beakers containing 150-ml aliquots
of the detergent formulations.  The electrodes  were shorted during periods
of no measurement.  Continuous aeration and mild agitation in each cell
was provided by the entry of air through a glass tube.  The cells were
maintained at 130 ±1 F during experiments by continuous immersion in a
water bath controlled at this temperature.

Figure 3 shows the electrical circuit for conducting the electrochemical
corrosion-rate measurements using the linear polarization method.  DC
power was provided by a 1-1/2-volt dry battery across a 1-ohm potentio-
meter  'A' in series with a 68-ohm resistor.  A  portion of the voltage
across potentiometer  'A1 was fed across the poles of a DPDT microswitch
in parallel with a series of circuits containing the electrochemical cell
and a  rotary switch  'B' with a choice of  1, 10, 100, and 1000-ohm resistors.
The microswitch was activated by a cam attached to a continuously variable
speed motor such  that  dc power to the electrochemical cell could be re-
versed for times  up to every 3 minutes.  By adjustment of the potentiometer
 "A1 a  steady and  reversible  10-mV signal  (AE) could be imposed across the
terminals of the  electrochemical cell.  The current  (AI) flowing through
the cell was measured  by the voltage drop across the selected resistor
in the rotary switch  'B1.  This voltage drop was fed to a sensitive re-
corder  (Honeywell, Electronik 19).  Figure 4 shows the types of records
obtained with this method  for general corrosion and  localized or pitting
corrosion.  As  shown  in Figure 4, a symmetrical current was measured upon
voltage  reversal  for  general corrosion.   However,  for localized corrosion,
the establishment of  different corrosion  potentials  on each electrode leads
to a  galvanic current through the cell and assymetry in the measured
current  through the  cell upon voltage reversal.

The  linear  polarization method of corrosion rate measurement  is based upon
the  linear  relationship between AE and AI at small values of AE of  the
order of lOmV.  AE and AI  are related to  the corrosion  rate I  through
the relationship              , ,
                         C   2.3  (bA + bc)    AE
 where b.  and bc are  Tafel slopes  for the anodic and  cathodic  reactions
 respectively of the  corrosion process. ^  The values  of  b^  and b^  can  be
 determined from potentiodynamic  polarization curves  of  the metals in  the
 detergent solutions.   Using the  recommended potentiodynamic polarization
 method^,  the potential of the electrode was. varied continuously with
 respect to a saturated calomel reference electrode at a preset rate
 utilizing a potentiostat (Anotrol, Model 4100), a scanner  control (Magna,
 Model 4510) and x-y  recorder (Honeywell, Model 520)  with a logarithmic
 voltmeter/amplifier  (Hewlett Packard, Model 7563A).   The potentiodynamic
 curves were determined at present rates between  1.2  and 1.6 volt  per  hour.
                                 15

-------
             41/2
                1,
                        I _ t
                   I"
              Front  View
                                 Copper wire
                                Moulding  resin
                           Corrosion coupon
                                                   h-i/411
                                                  1/2" -^
                                           Side  View
             FIGURE   2.  ELECTRODE  FOR   ELECTROCHEMICAL
                          MEASUREMENTS
               Cam operated  polarity reversing  switch
               .with variable speed  drive
ectrochemical
  cell
                                                                  O
                                                              To  recorder
   I	1
FIGURE   3.   ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT  FOR  ELECTROCHEMICAL  LINEAR-
             POLARIZATION  MEASUREMENTS

-------
Time
                                Potential
                                reversal
                       Measure of localized
                       .corrosion  tendency _
                                  Current, I
        a.  Localized Corrosion
                                                   AI, a measure of  general
                                                        corrosion
                                                     Potential reversal
                                                            Double  layer
                                                             charging
                                              b.  General  Non-Localized
                                                 Corrosion
 FIGURE  4.    SCHEMATIC  OF   LINEAR  POLARIZATION   MEASUREMENTS
For metals showing a passive  anodic behavior,
Equation 3 approximates  to Equation 4.
                                                   approaches infinity and
                      T  =-
                       C   2.3  AE
                                                                      (4)
 For systems showing a limiting cathodic  current behavior as in diffusion-
 controlled reactions, bp approaches  infinity and Equation 3 approximates
 to Equation 5.
                           2.3
                                                                       (5)
                                                                       ^'
                                  17

-------
                          SECTION VIII
                      EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS
Experimental work has been conducted on a variety of materials in a number
of detergent solutions with the employment of both coupon-weight loss and
electrochemical "linear polarization" corrosion evaluation methods.  The
experimental results of this work are presented for each material.
1100 Aluminum
The coupon-weight-loss data for 1100 Aluminum are tabulated in Tables 5
and 6 for STPP and NTA detergents, respectively.   Weight losses on this
metal varied between 0.8 and 10.8 mg per coupon for exposure periods of
11 to 14 days.  In general, the corrosion rates were low and ranged between
0.20 and 2.7 mils per year.  As indicated in Tables 5 and 6, the metal
generally suffered general corrosion but in several experiments pitting
was noted adjacent to the support holes in the coupons.   Due to the absence
of pits in other areas, it was concluded that such pitting was probably
associated with contamination of the material near the support hole from
drilling operations.

Figure 5 summarizes the weight-loss data in solutions at 130 F.  It was
apparent from Figure 5 that in both NTA- and STPP-based detergents, the
corrosion rates increased almost linearly with increase of concentration
from 0.06 to 0.18 weight percent.  In both detergent formulations, the
soft-water condition was slightly more corrosive by about 0.5 mil per year
or 50 percent at all concentrations, and the NTA solution was marginally
the most corrosive.  The effect of increasing temperature from 130 to
160 F in 0.12 weight percent solution of 150-ppm hardness was to slightly
increase corrosion.  However, in 15-ppm hardness, the effect was not
significant.

The increased corrosivity of NTA solutions over STPP solutions was more
readily seen by the representation of the data as shown in Figure 6.  The
increased corrosivity factors are summarized in Table 7.

As seen from Table 7, there was an increased corrosivity factor of 1.1 in
all detergent concentrations in the soft-water condition.  Although, there
was no increased corrosivity in 0.06 and 0.12 weight percent solutions in
the hard-water condition, the corrosivity factor was maximum at 1.3 in
the 0.18 weight percent detergents.  The increased corrosivity factor,
therefore, varied between 1.0 and 1.3 for 1100 Aluminum at  130 F solution
conditions.
                               18

-------
        Table 5.  Coupon-Weight Loss Data for 1100 Aluminum in 50 Weight Percent STPP-Based Detergents
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm Coupon
0.06 15 A45
A46
150 A47
A48
0. 12 15 A22
A23
A18
A 19
150 A24
A29
A20
A21
0.18 15 A25
A26
150 A27
A28
Temp, F
130
130
130
130
160
160
130
130
160
160
130
130
130
130
130
130
Exposure,
days
11
11
11
11
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
14
11
11
11
11
Corrosion
mdd
1.5
1.4
0.37
0.47
2.32
2.61
2.91
2.39
1.91
1.43
1.58
1.66
3.79
4.45
2.95
3.18
Rate 
-------
               Table  6.   Coupon Weight  Loss  Data  for  1100 Aluminum in  50 Weight Percent NTA-Based Detergents
NJ
O
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm Coupon
0.06 15 A41
A42
150 A43
A44
0.12 15 A9
A 10

A16
A17

150 All
A 12

A 13
A 14

0.18 15 A30
A31
150 A32
A33

Temp , F
130
130
130
130
160
160

130
130

160
160

130
130

130
130
130
130

Exposure,
days
11
11
11
11
14
14

14
14

14
14

14
14

11
11
11
11

Corrosion
mdd
1.8
1.5
0.42
0.37
3.09
2.76

3.09
2.65

2.28
2.54

1.65
1.62

4.49
5.05
3.60
4.12

Rate(a)
mpy
0.95
0.79
0.22
0.20
1.63
1.46

1.63
1.40

1.20
1.34

0.87
0.86

2.37
2.67
1.90
2.18

Remarks
Reddish-green lustre.
General corrosion.
Dull gray. A few pits
near support hole.
Dull gray. General corrosion
with a few pits (2-4 mils
deep) near support hole.
Dull gray. General corrosion
with pits (2-4 mils deep)
near support hole.
Dull gray. General corrosion
with a few pits (2 mils
deep) near support hole.
Dull gray. General corrosion
with a few pits (2 mils
deep) near support hole.
Dull reddish-green film.
General corrosion.
Dull reddish-green tarnish
film. Few pits near
support hole.
       (a) mdd = milligram/(decimeter) /day
           mpy = mils penetration/year

-------
 V
 Q.
 tf>
 0>
 O
 o:
 o
 o
 o
                                               15 ppm   150 ppm
                                              Hardness  Hardness
          50 weight  percent STPP based  detergent
          50 weight  percent NTA based detergent
                               o
     Q06
               0.12
Detergent  Concentration,  weight percent
0.18
FIGURE   5.   CORROSION  RATE OF  1100 ALUMINUM  AS  A  FUNCTION
             OF  DETERGENT  CONCENTRATION  IN 15 PPM AND 150
             PPM  WATER HARDNESS  AT  130 F
                             21

-------
                                                                15 ppm
                                                               Hardness
 o
 a>
 a>
 CL
      0
               0.06 weight percent  detergent concentration
               0.12 weight percent  detergent concentration
               0.18 weight percent  detergent concentration
                                                                  o
                                                                  a
0
50
                 STPP and  NTA Concentration,  weight  percent

                                     (a)
_J
 50 STPP
  0 NTA
 o
cc

 c
 o
"e/J
 O
 h_
 O
O
                                                        150 ppm
                                                        Hardness
               0.06 weight  percent detergent concentration
               0.12 weight  percent detergent concentration
               0.18 weight  percent detergent concentration
                                                                     I
       0
      50
                 STPP and  NTA  Concentration,  weight  percent

                                     (b)
                                                             50 STPP
                                                              0 NTA
FIGURE 6.   CORROSION  RATE OF 1100 ALUMINUM  AS  A  FUNCTION  OF
             STPP  AND  NTA  CONCENTRATION  AT  (a) 15 PPM  AND  (b) 150
             PPM  WATER  HARDNESS  AND  130 F
                                22

-------
    Table 7.   Increased  Corrosivity  Factors  for  NTA  Solutions Over STPP
              Solutions  with  1100 Aluminum
Detergent Concentration,              15-ppm                        150-ppm
    weight percent	Hardness	Hardness

         0.06                         1.1                            1.0
         0.12                         1.1                            1.0
         0.18                         1.1                            1.3
The corrosion behavior of 1100 Aluminum in a  number of 0.12 weight percent
solutions at 130 F was measured by the electrochemical linear polarization
method.  Results are shown in Figures 7(a) and 7(b).   The data indicated that
in all solutions, corrosion was initially high (5 to 30 mils per year) but
decreased considerably within a 1-day exposure.   Between 1 and 3 days, the
corrosion rates became steady at values between 0.04 and 0.4 mil per year.
The decrease in corrosion rate with time paralleled a decrease in corrosion
potential from about -1.1 volt to -0.4 volt versus saturated calomel electrode
(SCE).  The data in Figures 7(a) and 7(b) indicated that no major differences
occurred in corrosion rate with the use of a  mixed detergent; i.e., 37.5 STPP-
12.5 NTA-based detergent compared to a pure 50 STPP- or 50 NTA-based detergent.

The corrosion rates in Figure 7 were obtained using Equation 4 with values of
b^ =  oo and bg = 0.14 volt as determined from polarization curves in STPP and
NTA solutions.  Values of IQ were converted to mils per year using the relation-
ship  1 (j, A/cm  = 0.43 mpy.  It is apparent that corrosion rates evaluated by
the linear polarization method were about an order of magnitude smaller than
values determined by the weight-loss method.   This difference is not accounted
for by even drastic changes in b^ or b^ values but appears to be associated with
the development of a poorly conducting film on 1100 Aluminum.  The presence of
the film causes a low assessment of the corrosion rates by the electrochemical
method.
 260 Brass

 Weight-loss data for 260 Brass in STPP and NTA detergents are presented in
 Tables 8 and 9 respectively.  Weight losses varied between 1.1 and 18.3 mg per
 coupon for exposure times of 5 days.  Corrosion rates were low (between about
 0.2 and 3 mils per year).  In many experiments, the material tarnished and a
 wide variety of colored films were produced.  Although corrosion was always
 general and no pitting corrosion was observed, some dezincification of the
 material in some environments was apparent.  The dezincification was noted by
 the copper color of the dezincified coupons after descaling.  The copper color
 of the coupons was not the result of deposition of copper from the descaling
 solution of 10 weight percent ^SO^ or dezincification produced by the de-
 scaling solution as concluded from parallel studies with unexposed brass coupons.
 The dezincification process appeared to be associated more with the STPP-based


                                    23

-------
                     0.12 weight percent of 50 STPP detergent

                     0.12 weight percent of 50 NTA  detergent

                     0.12 weight percent of 37.5 STPP -12.5 NTA detergent
 15 ppm

Hardness

   o

   A

   D
 Q>
 Q.


 in
 E   IM -
 Q>

 "o
 a:
 c
 o
 "55
 o
 w
 o
 O
    0.02
                                I                        2

                                   Exposure  Time,  days
FIGURE  7 (a).  CORROSION RATE OF  1100 ALUMINUM AS  A  FUNCTION  OF EXPOSURE

              TIME  IN  15 PPM HARDNESS SOLUTIONS AT 130 F AND  USE OF THE

              LINEAR  POLARIZATION  METHOD
                                      24

-------
     30

     20



     10
      8

      6

      4
     1.0
     0.8

     0.6

     0.4
    Q2



    0.1
   0.08

   0.06

   0.04



   0.02
        0.12 weight percent of 50 STPP detergent
        0.12 weight percent of 50 NTA detergent
        0.12 weight percent of 37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA detergent
                                                        150 ppm
                                                        Hardness
                                   Exposure Time, days
FIGURE  7(b).
CORROSION  RATE  OF 1100 ALUMINUM  AS A  FUNCTION OF  EXPOSURE
TIME  IN 150 PPM  HARDNESS  SOLUTIONS  AT 130 F AND USE OF THE
LINEAR POLARIZATION  METHOD
                                      25

-------
          Table 8.
Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for 260 Brass in 50 Weight Percent STPP-Based Detergents
N)
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm Coupon
0.06 15 B45
B46

150 B47
B48
0.12 15 Bll
B12
B13
B14

150 B21
B22
B23
B24
0.18 15 B25
B26

150 B27
B28

Temp F
130
130

130
130
160
160
130
130

160
160
130
130
130
130

130
130

Exposure,
days
5
5

5
5
5
5
5
5

5
5
5
5
5
5

5
5

Corrosion
mdd
5.0
4.4

1.1
1.1
6.4
6.2
8.4
7.5

2.7
2.9
4.9
4.5
11.4
11.5

7.7
8.6

Rate
mpy
0.85
0.74

0.19
0.19
1.08
1.05
1.42
1.27

0.46
0.49
0.83
0.76
1.93
1.94

1.30
1.45

Remarks
Silver tarnish film. Moderate
dezincification indicated
after descaling.
Purple and gold tarnish film. .
No apparent dezincification.
Green tarnish film. General
corrosion with dezincification
Blue tarnish film. General
corrosion with greater
dezincification.
Green tarnish film. General
corrosion.
Blue tarnish film. General
corrosion and dezincification.
Blue tarnish film. Showed
brownish color due to
dezincification after descale.
Blue tarnish film. Showed
brownish color due to de-
zincification after descale
            mdd  = milligram/(decimeter)2/day
            mpy  = mils  penetration/year

-------
                Table 9.  Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for 260 Brass in 50 Weight Percent NTA-Based Detergents
ro
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm
0.06 15


150


0.12 15



150



0.18 15



150


^a'mdd = milligram/ (decimeter) 2/day
mpy = mils penetration/year

Coupon
B41
B42

B43
B44

B9
BIO
B16
B17
B15
B18
B19
B20
B29
B30


B31
B32




Temp F
130
130

130
130

160
160
130
130
160
' 160
130
130
130
130


130
130



Exposure,
days
5
5

5
5

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5


5
5



Corrosion
mdd
6.1
6.2

5.9
6.2

14.0
14.1
12.5
11.5
10.5
11.3
9.0
9.5
18.5
16.6


11.2
13.4



Rate
mpv
1.03
1.05

1.00
1.05

2.37
2.38
2.12
1.94
1.77
1.91
1.52
1.61
3.13
2.81


1.89
2.26




Remarks
Purple tarnish film. A trace
of dezincification indicated
after descaling.
Reddish-green tarnish film.
Moderate dezincification
indicated after descale.
Violet tarnish film. General
corrosion.
Green tarnish film. General
corrosion.
Black tarnish film. General
corrosion.
Reddish-blue tarnish film.
General corrosion.
Dark green tarnish film.
Showed pinkish color due
to dezincification after
descale.
Light-green tarnish film.
General corrosion. No
dezincification



-------
detergents and occurs greatest at the 0.12 and 0.18 weight percent solutions.
NTA-based solutions exhibited some mild dezincification at 0.06 and 0.18
concentrations but not at the 0.12 concentrations.  The process occurrred
in STPP solutions of pH 10.0 to 10.4 but not in the 0.06 STPP solution with
150 ppm hardness and pH 9.8.  Since the process occurred in 0.06 NTA solutions
of pH  9.9 and  10.3 for 150- and 15-ppm hardness, respectively, it appeared
that the dezincification process might be associated  in part with the
solution pH range of about  9.9 to  10.4.  The mild dezincification in the
0.18 NTA  solution with 15 ppm hardness and  pH  10.6 did, however, conflict
since  other solutions at pH 10.6 and  10.7 did  not produce dezincification.
As  shown  in Figure 8, metallography of the  most dezincified material re-
vealed that dezincification was  limited only to a very thin surface film
and did not penetrate  into  the  subsurface  layers  of  the material.
             C-3921                                    250X

      FIGURE 8.  CROSS SECTION OF DEZINCIFIED COUPON B14.

                 Note absence of subsurface corrosion.
 Figure 9 summarizes the weight-loss data for 260 Brass.   These data  showed
 that, in all detergent solutions, the corrosion rate increased linearly with
 increase of detergent concentration.  For both STPP and NTA solutions,  the
 soft-water condition was more corrosive than the hard-water condition.
 NTA-based solutions in the soft-water condition were more corrosive  than
 the other NTA and STPP solutions.  As seen from Tables 8 and 9,  the  effect
 of an increase in temperature from 130 to 160 F in 0.12 weight percent
                                 28

-------
 o
 0>
 0)
 Q.
 ir
 c
 o

 1
 o
 o
                                               ISppm  150 ppm
                                              Hardness Hardness
          50 weigh! percent STPP  based detergent
          50 weight percent NTA based detergent
    0.06
                0.12

Detergent   Concentration,  weight percent
0.18
FIGURE  9.   CORROSION  RATE  OF  260 BRASS  AS  A  FUNCTION
             OF DETERGENT CONCENTRATION  IN  15 PPM AND
             150 PPM  WATER  HARDNESS  AT  130  F
                             29

-------
                                                                  15 ppm
                                                                 Hardness
                        0.06 weight  percent detergent concentration
                        0.12 weight  percent detergent concentration
                        0.18 weight  percent detergent concentration
  a>
  "o
  a:
  c
  o
 "en
  o
                 STPP  and  NTA  Concentration,  weight percent

                                     (a)
                                                                   50 STPP
                                                                    0 NTA
150 ppm
Hardness
                         0.06 weight percent  detergent concentration
                         0.12 weight percent  detergent concentration
                         0.18 weight percent  detergent concentration
       0
      50
                STPP and NTA  Concentration,  weight percent

                                     (b)
  50 STPP
   0 NTA
FIGURE 10.  CORROSION  RATE  OF 260 BRASS AS A  FUNCTION  OF  STPP
            AND  NTA  CONCENTRATION  AT  (a) 15 PPM  AND  (b)  150 PPM
            WATER  HARDNESS AND  130 F
                                30

-------
u
O
Q)
C
O
'(/)
O
^
O
O
1.0 i

Q9
0.8

0.7

0.6


0.5
_  0.4
E

£  0.3
o
o:
0.2
                 0.12 weight
                 0.12 weight
                 0.12 weight
percent
percent
percent
of
of
of
50 STPP detergent
50 NTA detergent
37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA detergent
 15 ppm
Hardness
   o
   A
   a
                                                                            150 ppm
                                                                            Hardness
   0.1
                                    Exposure Time,  days
FIGURE  II.   CORROSION  RATE OF  260 BRASS  AS  A  FUNCTION  OF EXPOSURE TIME
            AT  130 F  AND  USE OF THE LINEAR  POLARIZATION  METHOD
                                      31

-------
solutions, was to cause a marginal increase in the rate of attack in NTA-
based solutions, but, in STPP-based solutions a marginal decrease occurred.
It is apparent from representation of the weight-loss data (Figure 10) that
NTA-based solutions were more corrosive than the corresponding STPP solutions.
As summarized in Table 10, the increased corrosivity factor was greatest in
hard water solutions and reached a maximum value of 5.0 to 0.06 weight percent


        Table 10.  Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions
                   Over STPP Solutions with 260 Brass
   Detergent Concentration
      weight percent	15-ppm Hardness	150-ppm Hardness
0.06
0.12
0.18
1.3
1.5
1.5
5.0
2.0
1.5
 concentration.   Thus, although there was no significant effect of concentration
 in soft water,  the  corrosivity factor increased with decrease of detergent
 concentration in hard water.  The corrosivity factor varied between 1.3 and
 5.0 on 260 Brass.

 The corrosion data  for  260  Brass using the linear  polarization method is
 summarized in Figure 11.  The results indicated that corrosion decreased
 considerably in the first day's exposure from about 1  to about 0.2 mil per
 year.   The 0.12 weight  percent NTA-based solution  with soft water appeared
 the most corrosive.  There  was no marked difference in corrosion rate values
 between mixed detergents containing 37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA and the pure STPP
 and NTA-based detergents. •  Corrosion rates in Figure 11 were determined
 using  Equation 4, since polarization curves indicated  values of b^ = °°
 and bg = 0.20 volt.  Values of IQ were converted to mil per year using
 the relationship 1^, A/cm^ = 0.48 mpy.  It was apparent from Figure 11 that
 calculated linear polarization corrosion rates were an order of magnitude
 smaller than corrosion  rates determined from weight-loss data.  Since
 drastic changes in  b^ and b~ values could not account  for this difference,
 it appeared that the developed tarnish film on these materials was suf-
 ficiently poorly conducting to cause a low assessment  of the corrosion rate
 with the electrochemical method.


 Electrolytic Copper


 Coupon-weight loss data for electrolytic copper is summarized in Tables
 11 and  12 for STPP and NTA  detergents, respectively.   Weight losses between
                                32

-------
                  Table 11.  Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Electrolytic Copper in 50 Weight Percent STPP-Based Detergents
u>
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm Coupon.
0.06 15 C45
C46
150 C47
C48
0.12 15 Cll
C12
C13
C14
150 C21
C22
C23
C24
0.18 15 C25
C26
150 C27
C28
Exposure, Corrosion Rate^3'
Temp F
130
130
130
130
160
160
130
130
160
160
130
130
130
130
130
130
days
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
mdd
3.
3.
1.
0.
2.
1.
5.
6.
3.
2,
3.
3.
10.
9.
10.
9.
4
4
6
8
1
9
4
5
4
0
0
0
4
4
2
0
.mpy
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
0.
0.
0.
0.
1.
1.
1.
1.
54
54
26
13
34
31
87
1
55
32
48
48
67
55
64
45
Remarks
Pale red tarnish film. General
corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
Slight golden

film.

film.

film.


General

General

General

tarnish film.
General corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
film.

film.

film.

General

General

General

             (a)                           2
              'mdd = milligram/(decimeter) /day

               mpy = mils penetration/year

-------
Table 12.  Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Electrolytic Copper in 50 Weight Percent NTA-Based Detergents
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm Coupon
0.06



0.12







0.18



15 C41
C42
150 C43
C44
15 C9
CIO
C17
CIS
150 C15
C16
C19
C20
15 C29
C20
150 C31
C32
(a\
Exposure, Corrosion Ratev '
Temp F days
130
130
130
130
160
160
130
130
160
160
130
130
130
130
130
130
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
mdd
5.
5.
1.
1.
16.
12.
11.
11.
10.
12.
10.
10.
17.
17.
6.
9.
9
3
8
9
7
8
7
9
1
2
9
8
0
4
8
0
mpy
0.
0.
0.
0.
2.
2.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
1.
2.
2.
1.
1.
95
85
28
31
69
06
88
92
63
96
75
74
74
80
09
45
Remarks
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
Golden tarnish
corrosion.
film.

film.

film.

film.

film.

film.

film.

film.

General

General

General

General

General

General

General

Genera 1

mpy
   milligram/(decimeter)2/day
   mils penetration/year

-------
1.2 and  17 mg per  coupon were obtained over the 5-day exposure periods.
Corrosion rates were  generally low at values between 0.2 and 2.8 mils per
year.  As noted in Tables 11 and  12,  the copper material usually showed a
golden tarnish film after exposure,  and corrosion appeared to be of a
general  nature.

Figure 12 summarizes  the weight-loss data for experiments conducted at
130 F.   It was clear  that in all  solutions,  the copper corrosion rate in-
creased  as detergent  concentration increased from 0.06 to 0.18 weight
percent.  The increase  in corrosion rate was more marked in NTA solutions
than in  STPP solutions.   The NTA  solutions were more corrosive than the
STPP solutions.  The  most corrosive solutions were those containing NTA and
the soft water of  15-ppm hardness.   From Tables 11 and 12, it appeared
that an  increase in temperature from 130 to 160 F in 0.12 weight percent NTA
solutions had little  effect  upon  the corrosion behavior.  The same effect
was noted in STPP  solutions  at the 150-ppm water hardness but in the 15-ppm
water hardness, the increased temperature decreased the corrosion rate by
almost a factor of 3.   This  temperature increase appears to have decreased
corrosion probably through the production of a more protective tarnish film.

The weight-loss data  as  shown in  Figure 13 indicated the NTA solutions were
more corrosive than the  corresponding STPP solutions.   As summarized in
Table 13, the increased  corrosivity factor varied between 1.5 and 3.8.
No marked change of corrosivity factor occurred with concentration in soft


        Table 13.  Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions
                   Over STPP Solutions with Electrolytic Copper

    Detergent Concentration
        weight percent	15-ppm Hardness	150-ppm Hardness
             0.06                    1.8                     1.5
             0.12                     1.9                     3.5
             0.18                     1.7                     3.8
water.  However, in hard water the  corrosivity  factor  increased with increase
of detergent concentration.

The corrosion data for electrolytic copper using  the  linear polarization
method is summarized in Figure 14.  The data  indicated that corrosion de-
creased rapidly within the first  1-day exposure from about  1 to 0.25 mil
per year in all environments.  Between 1 and  3  days,  the  calculated corrosion
rates for all solutions were between 0.2 and  0.3  mil per  year.   It  was
apparent from these results that  there was no marked difference in  corrosion
behavior between mixed detergents containing  37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA and the
pure STPP and NTA detergents.  Comparison of  the  linear polarization results
with coupon weight-loss data indicated that the linear polarization corrosion
rates were an order of magnitude  lower.  Values of b.  =  °°  and  br = 0.24
volt were determined from polarization experiments and Equation 4 was employed
to determine corrosion rates.  The  corrosion  rate !„ was  converted  using the
                                35

-------
     51—
 o>
 Q.
 V>
 
-------
    3r—
                                                                   15 ppm
                                                                  Hardness
          0.06 weight  percent detergent  concentration    A
          0.12 weight  percent detergent  concentration    o
          0.18 weight  percent detergent  concentration    a
 a>
 "5
 a:
 c
 o
 .
 o
o
STPP and  NTA  Concentration,  weight  percent

                    (a)
                                                                   50 STPP
                                                                    0 NTA
          0.06 weight  percent detergent  concentration
          0.12 weight  percent detergent  concentration
          0.18 weight  percent detergent  concentration
                                                  150 ppm
                                                  Hardness
                STPP and  NTA Concentration,  weight  percent

                                    (b)
                                                                   50 STPP
                                                                    0 NTA
FIGURE 13.  CORROSION  RATE OF  ELECTROLYTIC  COPPER  AS A  FUNCTION
           OF STPP AND  NTA CONCENTRATION  AT (a) 15-PPM   AND
           (b) 150'PPM  WATER  HARDNESS  AND  130 F
                               37

-------
    2.01—
 o
 0)
 v.
 
-------
                   2
relationship 1 |j,A/cm  = 0.46 mpy.   Since  drastic changes in b.  and bp values
could not account for such differences between weight loss and electrochemical
data, it appeared that poorly  conducting  tarnishing films developed on the
copper electrodes caused a low assessment of linear polarization corrosion
rates.
Die-Cast Zinc

Tables 14 and 15 summarize the  coupon-weight-loss  data  for die-cast zinc in
the STPP and NTA detergent solutions  at  130 and 160 F.   Weight losses were
between 4.5 and 102 mg per coupon  over the  2-day exposure periods to give
both low and high corrosion rates  between 2.1 and  44.3  mils per year.  As
shown by surface photographs  of exposed  coupons in Figures 15 to 18, a
variety of features were obtained.  In this material,  general corrosion
usually resulted in a continuous corrosion-product film on coupons (Figure 15)
that sometimes was semivoluminous.  Pitting corrosion of the order of 1 to
1-1/2 mils depth was usually  associated  with a moderate density of pitting
corrosion deposits on the surface  which  were reasonably large and also
slightly voluminous product  (Figure 16).  An example of such pitting corrosion
is shown in the photomicrograph of Figure 19.   It  was evident from metallo-
graphic studies (Figure 19) that the  pitting corrosion extended deeper (a
factor of two) than surface optical measurements would  reveal.  A higher
density of pitting corrosion  deposits but of smaller size (Figure 17)
generally indicated less aggressive pitting as evidenced in the photomicro-
graph of Figure 20.  Corrosion  of  the die-cast zinc occurred in all
solutions, but, as shown in Figure 18, the  corrosion could be limited to
mild  low density pitting.

Figure 21, in which the weight-loss data are summarized, allows the effects
of detergent concentration and  water  hardness to be more readily evaluated.
In terms of overall weight loss, with the exception of the point at 0.18
weight percent NTA with 150-ppm water hardness, it is evident that the
soft-water conditions of both NTA  and STPP  detergents were the most corrosive.
Of these solutions, the most  corrosive appeared to be the NTA-based solutions.
The least overall corrosive  solution  appeared to be the STPP-based solutions
with 150-ppm water hardness.  Again with the exception of the point of 0.18
weight percent NTA and  150-ppm  hardness, corrosion was maximum in 0.12 weight
percent detergent concentrations.  This  behavior was contrary to results on
aluminum, copper, brass, and  lead  in  which  corrosivity increased with increase
of detergent concentration.   It appears, therefore, that the slightly deeper
but less dense pitting  in 0.12  weight percent solutions was sufficient to
cause greater weight loss than  the less  deep but sometimes more dense
pitting in 0.06 and 0.18 weight percent  solutions.  As seen from Figure
21, however, at very large corrosion  rates  above 30 mils per year, the corrosion
was general.  Although  severe pitting of 1  to 3 mils depth in 2 days in 0.12
percent solutions represents  localized attack at a rate of 180 to 540 mils
per year, it is doubtful that this rate  would be sustained but rather would
become stifled by its own corrosion product.
                                 39

-------
Table 14.  Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Die-Cast Zinc in 50 Weight Percent STPP-based Detergent
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm
0.06 15


150

0.12 15




150





0. 18 15


150

(a)
mdd = milligram/ (decimeter)2/day
mpy = mils penetration/year
"^•"•"•••^••••••S
Coupon
D44
D45

D46
D47
Dll
D12
D13
D14

D21
D22

D23.
D24

D25
D26

D27
D28


=====
130
130

130
130
160
160
130
130

160
160

130
130

130
130

130
130


Exposure,
days
2
2

2
2
2
2
2
2

2
2

2
2

2
2

2
2


Corrosion
94.8
76.1

10.5
16.9
38.4
52.7
104.4
103.7

77.8
86.9

49.2
63.7

73.5
92.4

40.3
31.6


Rate(a)
19.1
15.4

2.12
3.41
7.76
10.7
21.1
21.0

15.7
17.6

9.94
12.9

14.8
18.7

8.14
6.38


Remarks
Very mild shallow pitting of
high density plus low density
pitting up to 0.4 mil deep.
Very mild shallow pitting of
low density.
General corrosion with patches
of pitting (Imtl deep).
Mostly pitting corrosion of
high density but small
depth (0.4 mil).
Mostly pitting corrosion of
high density and small
depth (0.4 mil)
Mostly pitting corrosion of
high density and moderate
depth (0.7 mil).
Patches of light pitting
corrosion (up to 0.5 mil
deep).
Patches of very light pitting
corrosion (up to 0.5 mil deep)



-------
    Table 15.  Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Die-Cast Zinc In 50 Weight Percent NTA-Based Detergents
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm Coupon
0.06 15 D40
D41
150 D42
D43

0.12 15 D9
D10
D16
D17
150 D15
D18

D19
D20

0.18 15 D29
D30

150 D31
D34
Exposure,
Temp F days
130
130
130
130

160
160
130
130
160
160

130
130

130
130

130
130
2
2
2
2

2
2
2
2
2
2

2
2

2
2

2
2
, Corrosion Rate^a'
mdd
158
163
22.9
17.6

234
222
183
173
135
115

77.1
116

92.2
115

154
195.2
mpy
31.9
33.0
4.6
3.6

44.3
44.8
37.0
35.0
27.3
23.2

15.6
23.5

18.6
23.2

31.0
39.4
Remarks
White voluminous deposit.
Uneven general corrosion.
Very low density pitting
corrosion up to 0.8 mil
deep.
White corrosion product.
General corrosion.
White corrosion product.
General Corrosion.
Mostly pitting corrosion of
low density and moderate
width and depth (1.5 mil).
Slightly less pitting of
about same depth (1.5 mil).
Small general corrosion.
Mostly pitting corrosion of
medium density and low depth
(up to 0.5 mil).
General corrosion.

(a)                             2
  mdd = milligram/(decimenter) /day

  mpy = mils  penetration/year

-------
     P417
 FIGURE 15.  DIE-CAST ZING COUPON D34
            AFTER EXPOSURE
            Note continuous deposit
            associated with general
            corrosion
                                        P418
                                 FIGURE 16.  DIE-CAST ZINC COUPON  D29
                                            AFTER EXPOSURE
                                            Note the moderate density
                                            and reasonably  large  size
                                            of pitting corrosion
                                            deposit.
     P636
FIGURE 17.
DIE-CAST ZINC COUPON D45
AFTER EXPOSURE
Note the very high density
but smaller size of pitting
corrosion deposits.

                 42
         P638
FIGURE 18.   DIE-CAST  ZINC  COUPON  D43
            AFTER EXPOSURE
            Note  the  extremely  low
            density of  pitting  corrosion
            deposits  and low  general
            corrosion.

-------


          C-3922                                                250X
FIGURE 19.  CROSS SECTION OF PITTED AREA IN COUPON D18
            Note extended fine corrosion paths beneath main pits.

          C-3923

FIGURE 20.  CROSS  SECTION OF  PITTED  AREA  IN  COUPON  D14
            Note smaller  pit  size  than  in Figure  18.

                                 43
250X

-------
    501—
    40
 o
 0)
 0>
 o.

 in
 "5
 c
 o
 o
 O
      ).06
                                  15 ppm   150 ppm

                                 Hardness  Hardness
          50 weight percent STPP based  detergent

          50 weight percent NTA  based  detergent
                p---denotes pitting  corrosion
                    0.12

    Detergent Concentration, weight percent
0.18
FIGURE   21.
CORROSION RATE  OF DIE-CAST ZINC  AS A  FUNCTION

OF  DETERGENT  CONCENTRATION IN  15 PPM AND 150

PPM WATER HARDNESS  AT 130 F
                              44

-------
    50
    40
 o
 CD
 O
 CL
 CO
QC


O

O
k.
l_
o
    20
    10
      O
      50
                                                           15 ppm
                                                          Hardness
                 0.06 weight percent detergent concentration
                 0.12 weight percent detergent concentration
                 0.18 weight percent detergent concentration
                            P---denotes  pitting  corrosion
                                                             A
                                                             o
                                                             a
                                                                  50 STPP
                                                                   0 NTA
                STPP and  NTA  Concentration,  weight percent
FIGURE  22 (a).  CORROSION  RATE OF DIE-CAST ZINC AS A FUNCTION  OF
                STPP AND NTA CONCENTRATION   AT  15 PPM WATER
                HARDNESS AND  130 F
                               45

-------
                                                          150 ppm
                                                          Hardness
                0.06 weight  percent detergent  concentration
                0.12 weight  percent detergent  concentration
                0.18 weight  percent detergent concentration
                            P---denotes  pitting  corrosion
 o:

 c
 o
 'in
 o
                                                                  50 STPP
                                                                   0 NTA
                STPP and  NTA  Concentration,  weight percent
FIGURE  22 (b).  CORROSION  RATE OF DIE-CAST  ZINC AS  A  FUNCTION OF
                STPP AND NTA  CONCENTRATION  AT  150  PPM  WATER
                HARDNESS  AND  130  F
                               46

-------
Figures 22(a) and 22(b) present the weight-loss data to indicate the increased
corrosivity of NTA-based solutions over corresponding STPP-based solutions.
As shown in Table 16, the corrosivity factor varied between 1.5 and 4.7.


    Table 16.  Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions Over
               STPP Solutions with Die-Cast Zinc


    Detergent Concentration,
        weight percent	15-ppm Hardness	150-ppm Hardness
0.06
0.12
0.18
1.9
1.7
1.3
1.5
1.7
4.7
In soft-water solutions, the corrosivity factor increased from 1.3 to 1.9
with decrease of concentration.  However, in hard-water solutions, the
corrosivity factor increased with increase of concentration to a maximum
of 4.7.

A limited number of X-ray diffraction studies conducted on corrosion
products indicate that ZnSO^, Zn(OH)2> and ZnO were the major components
of these products.  From coupons D25/D26 in an STPP-based solution, the
compounds ZnSO^ • 3Zn(OH)2  • ^H^O, and ZnO were identified.  Similar com-
pounds ZnS04 • 6Zn(OH)2 • 4H20, and ZnO were identified on coupons D31/D34
from an NTA-based solution.

The electrochemical linear  polarization corrosion rates for die-cast zinc
are summarized in Figure 23.  These results were calculated using Equation 5
with values of bA = 0.070 volt and bg = °°determined from polarization curves.
As seen from Figure 23, determined corrosion rates generally decreased from
early values of about  15 mils per year to steady values after 1 to 3 days
of 1 to 5 mils per year.  It was apparent that the mixed solutions of 37.5
STPP-12.5 SNTA showed  no marked differences in corrosion behavior  from those
of the pure STPP or SNTA solutions.  It was evident that the linear polari-
zation method gave corrosion rates of the order of 6 times smaller than
rates determined by weight  loss.  As for 1100 Aluminum, brass, and copper,
the data indicated that the presence of a poorly conducting film  on die-
cast zinc in these detergent solutions interferred with the evaluation of
corrosion rate by this method.  In many measurements with die-cast zinc,
the measurements were  similar to those in Figure 4(a); i.e., an unsymmetrical
current response, indicating localized corrosion.  This localized corrosion
was evidenced as pitting of the electrodes.

201 Nickel
This metal was exposed  to  0.12 weight  solutions  of both  STPP-and NTA-based
detergents with  15- and 150-ppm water  hardness at 130 F  for  periods of  14
days.  No weight loss was  obtained  on  coupons, thus  indicating  corrosion
rates  of the  order of 0.01 mil per  year  or  less.
                                 47

-------
                                                                       15 ppm
                                                                      Hardness
                     0.12 weight percent of 50 STPP detergent
                     0.12 weight percent of 50 NTA detergent
                     0.12 weight percent of 37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA detergent
  o
  0>
  Q)
  Q.
  (ft
  a>
  a
  a:

  I  30
  o
                           I                        2
                              Exposure  Time,  days

                                      (a)
  o
  o
20
     10
      8

      6
                                                                 150 ppm
                                                                 Hardness
                 0.12  weight percent of 50 STPP detergent
                 0.12  weight percent of 50 NTA detergent
                 0.12  weight percent of 37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA detergent
                                I                         2
                                    Exposure Time, days

                                           (b)
FIGURE  23.  CORROSION  RATE OF DIE-CAST ZINC AS  A FUNCTION  OF  EXPOSURE
             TIME  IN (a) 15 PPM  AND  (b) 150 PPM  HARDNESS  SOLUTIONS  AT
             130 F  AND  USE OF  THE  LINEAR  POLARIZATION  METHOD
                                    48

-------
     0.6
     0.4
     0.2
Q.

w

-------
The electrochemical linear polarization measurements on this material are
summarized in Figure 24.  These results indicated for 0.12 weight solutions
at 130 F that corrosion rates decreased appreciably from 0.2 to between 0.06
and 0.07 mil per year within a day's exposure.  The decrease in corrosion
rate paralleled a change in corrosion potential from about -0.27 to -0.21
volt versus SCE.  It was evident that there was no marked difference in
corrosion behavior in mixed solutions containing 37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA and the
pure STPP and NTA-based solutions.  Corrosion rates were not significantly
different to indicate any marked differences in the corrosivity of the
solutions.  The corrosion rates of 0.06 to 0.07 mil per year indicated a
very corrosion-resistant material that could be used safely in either the
STPP- or NTA-based detergents.


Type 304 Stainless Steel

This metal was  exposed  to 0.12 weight percent solutions of both STPP and
NTA-based detergents containing 15- and 150-ppm hardness at 130 F for
periods of  14 days.  As for 201 Nickel, this metal showed no weight loss,
thus  corrosion  rates of the order of 0.1 mil per year or less were
 indicated.

The  linear  polarization corrosion rate measurements for this metal are
 summarized  in Figure 25.  The data in Figure 25 showed that initial corrosion
rates of about  0.15 mil per year decreased to between 0.02 and 0.06 mil
per year after  1 day's  exposure.  The decrease in corrosion rate paralleled
changes in  corrosion potential from about -0.26 to -0.21 volt versus SCE.
Analysis of the data in Figure 25 indicated that detergent solutions in hard-
water conditions; i.e., with more Cl~ were more corrosive than those in
 soft-water  conditions.   It was evident that mixed solutions of 37.5 STPP-
 12.5  NTA showed no marked corrosion differences to pure STPP or NTA solutions.
Type  304 stainless steel which was slightly more corrosion resistant than 201
Nickel was  the  most corrosion-resistant material as measured in this study.


Type 420 Stainless Steel

This alloy was  similarly exposed  to 0.12 weight percent solutions of both
STPP and NTA-based detergents with 15- and 150-ppm water hardness at 130 F
for periods  of  14 days.  No weight loss was observed for this metal, thus
indicating  corrosion rates of the order of 0.01 mil per year or less.

Figure 26 shows the linear polarization corrosion rates determined for this
alloy.  It was  apparent from Figure 26 that some changes occurred in corrosion
rates in NTA and  STPP solution in the soft-water condition but that, generally,
corrosion rates were small (values between 0.06 and 0.15 mil per year). As
for Type 304 stainless  steel, the hard water conditions were the slightly
more corrosive  solutions.  The corrosion rates of this material were slightly
higher than those  for Type 304 stainless steel and 201 Nickel, but they are
representative  of a good corrosion-resistant material.
                                 50

-------
     0.4
     0.2
                  0.12 weight percent of 50 STPP detergent
                  0.12 weight percent of 50 NTA detergent
                  0.12 weight percent of 37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA detergent
 15 ppm
Hardness
   o
   A
   a
a>
"o
CC
c:
O
v>
2
i_
o
                             I                         2
                                Exposure Time, days

                                        (a)
 0.4



 0.2



 O.I
Q08

0.06

0.04


Q02
                      0.12 weight percent of 50 STPP detergent
                      0.12 weight percent of 50 NTA detergent
                      0.12 weight percent of 37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA detergent
150 ppm
Hardness
                                     Exposure Time, days

                                             (b)
FIGURE  25.
         CORROSION  RATE  OF TYPE 304 STAINLESS  STEEL AS  A FUNCTION  OF
         EXPOSURE TIME  IN  (a)  15 PPM AND (b) 150 PPM  HARDNESS  SOLUTIONS
         AT 130 F AND USE OF THE  LINEAR  POLARIZATION METHOD
                                      51

-------
o
o>
tO
o
DC
in
o
     0.4 i—
 0.2



 0.1

0.08

Q06


O04



0.02
                     0.12 weight  percent  of  50 STPP detergent
                     0.12 weight  percent  of  50 NTA detergent
                     0.12 weight  percent  of  37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA  detergent
 15 ppm
Hardness
   o
   A
   D
                                                                                   u
                                 I                         2
                                     Exposure  Time, days

                                            (a)
 0.4



 0.2



 O.I

0.08

0.06


0.04



0.02
150 ppm
Hardness
                     0.12 weight  percent  of 50 STPP detergent
                     0.12 weight  percent  of 50 NTA detergent
                     0.12 weight  percent  of 37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA detergent
                                 I                         2
                                     Exposure Time, days

                                             (b)
 FIGURE  26.
           CORROSION  RATE  OF  TYPE 420 STAINLESS STEEL  AS A  FUNCTION
           OF EXPOSURE  TIME IN  (a)  15 PPM  AND (b) 150 PPM HARDNESS SO-
           LUTIONS AT  130 F AND USE OF  THE LINEAR POLARIZATION METHOD
                                     52

-------
1020 Carbon Steel

Weight loss data for 1020 carbon steel are summarized in Tables 17 and 18
for STPP and NTA solutions respectively.  Weight losses for this material
varied between 9.5 and 125 mg over the 2-day exposure periods to give
corrosion rates between 4.4 and 57 mils per year.  The corrosion rates
varied, therefore, between low and very high.  In general, four types of
corrosion behavior were obtained as typified by Figures 27 to 30.  Figure
27 shows the appearance of general, even corrosion; Figure 28 shows general
corrosion with heavier localized corrosion.  This material also evidenced
localized etching corrosion which would occur with no evidence of an adherent
deposit as shown by Figure 29 or under a reasonably adherent deposit as
shown by Figure 30.  The etched areas generally revealed a faceted structure
in surface microscopy but metallography indicated that this corrosion
did not penetrate beyond a surface layer, e.g., as grain-boundary corrosion.

The weight-loss data are summarized in Figure 31.  Although trends are not
evident in Figure 31 (due to localized corrosion producing misleading low
overall corrosion rates), this materials action is probably similar to the
others.  Thus, considering that the localized corrosion results represented
by 'L' in Figure 31 are probably much higher rates, it appears that the
corrosion rates probably increase with increase in detergent concentration.
The NTA-based solutions in the soft water condition appear to be the most
corrosive of all.  It does appear also that an increase in detergent
concentration favors localized corrosion for both STPP and NTA solutions.

The weight-loss data shown in Figures 32(a) and 32(b) allow determination
of the increased corrosivity factor for NTA solutions over STPP solutions.
These results summarized in Table  19, show that the increased corrosivity

        Table 19.  Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions
                   Over STPP Solutions with 1020 Carbon Steel
   Detergent Concentration,
      weight percent           15-ppm Hardness	150-ppm Hardness
0.06
0.12
0.18
2.9
7.1
-3.0
-------
           Table 17.   Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for 1020 Carbon Steel in 50 Weight Percent STPP-Based Detergents
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm Coupon
0.06 15 H45
H46

150 H47
H48
0.12 15 Hll
H12
H13
£ H14
150 H21
H22
H23
H24
0.18 15 H25
H26
150 H27
H28
=====
Temp,
F
130
130

130
130
160
160
130
130
160
160
130
130
130
130
130
130
Exposure,
days
2
2

2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Corrosion E
mdd
60.7
56.0

26.4
23.8
43.9
70.2
41.4
40.1
167.9
213.3
109.5
138.3
273.8
271.6
68.8
58.0
ropy Remarks
11.1 Dark brown deposit. General
10.2 corrosion plus heavier localized
corrosion.
4.83 Bright appearance. General
4.35 corrosion.
8.03 Local etching corrosion.
12.9
7.58 Local etching corrosion.
7.34
30.7 Mostly heavy general etching
39.0 plus some localized.
20.0 Mostly general mild etching.
25.3
50.1 General even corrosion
49.7
12.6 Local etching corrosion.
10.6
                                f\
(a)   mdd = milligram/(decimeter)  /day
     mpy = mils penetration/year

-------
          Table 18.   Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for 1020 Carbon Steel in 50 Weight Percent NTA-Based Detergents
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm Coupon
0.06 15 H41
H42
150 H43
H44
0.12 15 H9
H10
HIS
H19
150 H15
H16
H17
H20
0.18 15 H29
H30
150 H31
H32
Temp,
F
130
130
130
130
160
160
130
130
160
160
130
130
130
130
130
130
Exposure,
days
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
Corrosion
mdd
161
157
116
85.8
152
140
277
311
180
207
130.1
110.0
97.9
81.6
185
137
Rate(a)
mpy
29.5
28.7
21.2
15.7
27.8
25.6
50.6
56.9
32.9
37.8
23.8
20.1
17.9
14.9
33.9
25.1
Remarks
General and some heavier
localized corrosion.
Reddish-brown film. Even
general corrosion.
Localized shallow etching
(2-mil deep) under corrosion
product.
General corrosion.
Intense local etching corrosion.
Local etching corrosion.
Local etching corrosion.
Localized and general corrosion.
(a)   mdd = milligram/(decimeter)  /day
     mpy = mils penetration/year

-------
     P416
FIGURE 27.
1020 CARBON STEEL COUPON H26
AFTER EXPOSURE
Note general corrosion.
    P639
FIGURE 28. 1020 CARBON STEEL COUPON H41
           AFTER EXPOSURE
           Note general corrosion and
           heavier localized corrosion.
    P419
FIGURE 29. 1020 CARBON STEEL COUPON H27
           AFTER EXPOSURE
           Note corrosion-deposit-free
           localized corrosion.
                                      P638
                                 FIGURE  30.  1020  CARBON STEEL COUPON H46
                                             AFTER EXPOSURE
                                             Note  corrosion-deposit-covered
                                             localized  corrosion.
                                 56

-------
    70
    60
    50
                                                 15 ppm   150 ppm
                                                Hardness  Hardness
           50 weight' percent  STPP based detergent
           50 weight  percent  NTA based detergent
                                 o
                                 A
     0.06
                                denotes  localized corrosion
                0.12
Detergent  Concentration,  weight percent
0.18
FIGURE  31.  CORROSION  RATE  OF 1020 CARBON  STEEL AS A FUNCTION
            OF  DETERGENT  CONCENTRATION  IN 15 PPM  AND  150 PPM
            WATER  HARDNESS  AT 130 F
                              57

-------
   60
    10
 15 ppm
Hardness
          0.06 weight percent detergent concentration
          0.12 weight percent detergent concentration
          0.18 weight percent detergent concentration
                             denotes  localized corrosion
      0
     50
          _J
           50 STPP
            0 NTA
               STPP and  NTA Concentration,   weight  percent
FIGURE  32 (a).  CORROSION RATE OF 1020 CARBON  STEEL AS  A FUNCTION
               OF STPP AND NTA CONCENTRATION AT 15 PPM  WATER
               HARDNESS AND  130 F
                             58

-------
    60
    50
o
O)
o>
Q.
tf)
40
 -  30
o:

c
g
'to
o
i_
o
O
    10
       0.06 weight percent  detergent  concentration

       0.12 weight percent  detergent  concentration

       0.18 weight percent  detergent  concentration



                      L---denotes  localized  corrosion
                                                  150 ppm

                                                  Hardness
      0
      50
                                                             _J

                                                             50  STPP

                                                              0  NTA
                STPP  and  NTA Concentration,  weight percent
FIGURE 32 (b).
            CORROSION  RATE OF !020 CARBON  STEEL  AS A  FUNCTION

            OF STPP AND NTA CONCENTRATION  AT  150 PPM  WATER

            HARDNESS  AND  130 F
                              59

-------
0)
CL
   100 -
    80

    60


    40
20




 10

 8

 6
 o
cc
 c

I  I0°
 t   80
 o
°   60
     4O




     20




     10

     8

     6
       0.12 weight percent  of 50 STPP detergent
       0.12 weight percent  of 50 NTA detergent
       0.12 weight percent  of 37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA detergent
 15 ppm
Hardness
   o
   A
   a
                           I                         2
                               Exposure Time,  days

                                       (a)
                   3
                                                          150 ppm
                                                          Hardness
       0.12  weight percent of 50 STPP detergent
       0.12  weight percent of 50 NTA detergent
       0.12  weight percent of 37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA detergent
                                   Exposure Time, days

                                           (b)
FIGURE  33.  CORROSION RATE OF  1020 CARBON STEEL AS  A  FUNCTION  OF  EXPOSURE
            TIME  IN  (a) 15 PPM  AND  (b) 150 PPM  HARDNESS SOLUTIONS AT  130  F
            AND USE  OF THE  LINEAR POLARIZATION  METHOD
                                     60

-------
 the  corrosion rate increased over the first day's exposure to steady state.
      >ehavior paralleleda  change in corrosion potential from about -0.6 to
     • volt  versus  SCE.  The  linear polarization results  which were evaluated
       :he  determined values  of bA = 0.14 volt and bc = ooand Equation 5  Rave
 corrosion  rates between about 15 and 40 mils per year  which were in good
           with weight  loss data.   The linear polarization results appeared
 to indicate  that  STPP  solutions were more corrosive  than NTA solutions  with
 the  mixed  STPP-NTA solutions of intermediate behavior.   The STPP solution
 •n the   .ft-water condition  appeared to be  the most  corrosive.   In several
      ons, the linear  polarization method gave responses similar to that
 ihown in Figure 4(a)  indicating a  localized form of  corrosion,  as evidenced
 on the electrode  after experiments.

 A limited  number  of studies  were  made of corrosion products by  X-ray diffraction
 Coupons H27/H28 and H45/H46  from STPP solutions  were found  to contain a
     1)3 product as  did  coupons  H29/H30 from an NTA solutions.   Coupons  H43/
         from a NTA  solution showed  the  presence  of a 6  -FeOOH  product  with a
               for NaFe02 and a  very  faint pattern for Fe304.  It  appears that
   OH)3 which  was  sharper from  samples  off  coupons H45/H46  was  aided by  the
 soft-water condition of the  low-STPP  concentration.  This solution  corresponded to
 the  lowest PH  value of  10.0  of  these  solutions  producing this corrosion  product.

 Chemica1 Lead

Tables 20 and  21  summarize the weight-loss  data  for chemical lead in  STPP
    NTA  solutions, respectively.  Weight  losses varied between  11 and 223 mg
 per coupon over the 5-day exposure periods.  Corrosion rates between  1.3 and
29 mils  per year were moderately low and very high, respectively. The corrosion
      J material appeared to be general and a dull white  or  gray deposit
typi::ied in Figure 34 was observed on the specimens.
        P415
     FIGURE  34.
  (a)
(b)
CHEMICAL LEAD COUPON L26  (a) BEFORE AND
Note fine white deposit.
                                                          (b) AFTER EXPOSURE
                                 61

-------
               Table 20.  Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Chemical Lead in 50 Weight Percent STPP-Based Detergents
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm Coupon
0.06 15 L45
L46
150 L47
L48
0.12 , 15 Lll
L12
L13
L1A
c* 150 L21
L22

L23
L24
0.18 15 L25
L26
L27
L28
Temp,
F
130
130
130
130
160
160
130
130
160
160

130
130
130
130
130
130
Exposure,
days
5
5
5
. 5
5
5
5
5
5
5

5
5
5
5
5
5
Corrosion
mmd
34.4
32.8
10.1
13.4
25.1
25.4
54.3
62.3
72.1
78.9

65.3
57.3
177.2
150.8
95.0
100.2
Rate(a)
mpy
4.37
4.17
1.28
1.70
3.19
3.23
6.90
7.91
9.16
10.0

8.29
7.28
22.5
19.2
12.1
12.7
Remarks
Dull greenish-gray film. General
corrosion.
Dull light gray film. General
corrosion.
Dull gray. General corrosion.

Dull gray with yellow spotted
areas. General corrosion.
Dull gray and traces of white
and brown deposits. General
corrosion.
Dull gray with traces of white
deposit. General corrosion.
Fine dull white deposit. General
corrosion.
Dull gray with trace of white.
General corrosion.
(a)   mdd = milligram/(decimeter)  /day
     mpy = mils penetration/year

-------
              Table 21.   Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Chemical Lead in 50 Weight Percent NTA-Based Detergents
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm Coupon
. 0.06 15 L41
L42
150 L43
L44
0.12 15 L9
L10
L16
^ L17
W 150 L15
LI 8
L19
L20
0.18 15 L29
L30
150 L31
L32

Temp,
F
130
130
130
130
160
160
130
130
160
160
130
130
130
130
130
130

Exposure,
days
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5

(a)
Corrosion Rate
mdd
104
119
43.8
28.3
219
226
112
137
169
155
109
101
146
174
131
127

mpy
13.2
15.2
5.56
3.59
27.8
28.7
14.2
17.4
21.4
19.7
13.8
12.8
18.5
22.0
16.6
16.1

Remarks
Fine white deposit. General
corrosion.
Dull light gray film. General
corrosion.
Fine crystalline deposit. General
corrosion.
Fine crystalline deposit. General
corrosion.
Coarse crystalline white deposit.
General corrosion.
White crystalline deposit.
General corrosion.
Fine white deposit. General
corrosion.
Dull gray with traces of
yellowish-green white
deposit. General corrosion.
(a)   mdd = milligram/(decimeter)  /day
     mpy = mils penetration/year

-------
    50
    40
0>
ex
(A
0)
"5
o:
g
'in
o
*_
o
o
30
    20
    10
       50 weight percent  STPP based  detergent
       50 weight percent  NTA  based  detergent
 15 ppm   150 ppm
Hardness  Hardness
   o        •
   A        A
     0.06
                              0.12
              Detergent Concentration, weight  percent
                0.18
FIGURE  35.
          CORROSION  RATE  OF  CHEMICAL  LEAD  AS A FUNCTION
          OF  DETERGENT  CONCENTRATION  IN 15 PPM  AND  150
          PPM WATER  HARDNESS  AT  130 F
                             64

-------
     30 i—
     20 9=
                      0.06 weight percent  detergent concentration
                      0.12 weight percent  detergent concentration
                      0.18 weight percent  detergent concentration
                                                           15 ppm
                                                          Hardness
                                                             A
                                                             o
                                                             D
 a>
 o.
a>
"a
a:
c
o
o
o
                 STPP and NTA Concentration, weight percent

                                     (a)
                                                                   50 STPP
                                                                    0 NTA
30
     20
                                                          150 ppm
                                                          Hqrdness
                 0.06 weight  percent  detergent concentration     A
                 0.12 weight  percent  detergent concentration     •
                 0.18 weight  percent  detergent concentration     •
                 STPP and  NTA  Concentration,   weight percent

                                     (b)
                                                                   50 STPP
                                                                    0 NTA
FIGURE 36.  CORROSION  RATE  OF CHEMICAL  LEAD  AS  A FUNCTION OF
             STPP AND  NTA  CONCENTRATION AT (a) 15 PPM  AND (b)
             150 PPM  WATER  HARDNESS  AND  130 F
                                65

-------
     0.2
     O.I
    0.08

    0.06

    0.04
    0.02
 s
 Q,  0.01

 j« 0.008
      0.12  weight  percent  ot  50 STPP detergent
      0.12  weight  percent  of  50 NTA  detergent
      0.12  weight  percent  of  37.5 STPP- 12.5 NTA detergent
                                                             15 ppm
                                                            Hardness
                                                               o
                                                          a
 a
 cc.
 c
 o
 "8
 o
 o
0.2
     0.1
    0.08

    Q06

    0.04
    0.02
    0.01
   0.008
                                    Exposure  Time,  days

                                            (a)
       0.12 weight percent of 50 STPP detergent
       0.12 weight percent of 50  NTA detergent
       0.12 weight percent of 37.5 STPP-12.5 NTA  detergent
                                                        150 ppm
                                                        Hardness
                                 I                         2
                                    Exposure  Time,  days

                                            (b)
FIGURE 37.  CORROSION RATE OF CHEMICAL LEAD AS A  FUNCTION  OF  EXPOSURE
             TIME  IN  (a)  15  PPM  AND  (b)  150 PPM   HARDNESS SOLUTIONS  AT 130 F
             AND USE  OF THE  LINEAR  POLARIZATION  METHOD
                                     66

-------
Figure 35 summarizes the weight-loss data in Tables 20 and 21.   The data
indicated that the corrosion rate of chemical lead increased with increase
of detergent concentration and that NTA solutions appeared to be more
corrosive than the corresponding STPP solutions.  The most corrosive
solutions were those based upon NTA in the soft-water condition.

Figure 36 shows the weight-loss data from which the increased corrosivity
of the NTA solutions could be determined.  These results are summarized in
Table 22 which shows that the corrosivity factor varied between 1.0 and 3.1.
Values for both soft- and hard-water conditions are similar and increased
with decreased detergent concentration.


        Table 22.  Increased Corrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions
                   Over STPP Solution with Chemical Lead
      Detergent Concentration,
          weight percent	15-ppm Hardness	150-ppm Hardness
                0.06                   3.1      "           3.0
                0.12                   2.1                  1.6
                0.18                   1.0                  1.3
The linear polarization measurements on chemical lead are summarized in
Figure 37.  As seen from Figure 37, large changes in corrosion rates were
measured over the first-day exposure period.  Generally the corrosion
potentials varied between -0.5 and -0.6 volt versus SCE but did not parallel
the marked changes in corrosion rate.  The corrosion rates were calculated
using Equation 5 and the determined values of b^ = 0.30 volt and b^ = °°
from polarization curves.  It was apparent that the corrosion rates measured
by the linear polarization method were very much smaller than those determined
by weight loss.  Again, it would appear that poorly, conducting films produced
on the material in these solutions gave a low assessment of corrosion rate.
X-ray diffraction identified  corrosion products of
and N32S04 on coupons L25/L26 from a STPP solution.  Coupons L29/L30 from a
NTA solution indicated products  of Pb3(C03)2(OH)2 and PbO(red).  The product
PbO (red) was also identified on the coupons L31/L32 from another NTA solution.
Lead was the only material  in which phosphate deposits were identified on
materials exposed to STPP-based  detergents.


Cast-iron Soil-Pipe Material

The weight- loss data for  this material are  shown in Tables 23 and 24 for as-
prepared and soil STPP and  NTA solutions respectively.  Soil-pipe studies
were conducted at 130 F since this temperature related to studies of other
materials and was only slightly  higher than the usual temperature (115 to
120 F)  of detergent solutions goitg to drain.  As shown in Table 23, weight-
loss data on this material  was obtained over exposure periods of 2 and 7
days.   Two exposure periods were used because 2-day corrosion rates were
very high and, therefore, there  was a need  to determine if these corrosion
rates became stiff led on  longer  exposure.   The corrosion rates of this
material were always very high (16 to 120 mils per year) in the fresh
detergent solutions (Table  23).

                                    67

-------
                  Table 23.  Coupon-Weight-Loss Data for Cast Iron Soil Pipe in STPP and NTA-Based Detergents
ON
00
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,

weight percent ppjn Coupon
0.12 of 50 wt. percent 15
NTA-based detergent


150




0.12 of 50 wt. percent 15
STPP-based Detergent




150





(a) mdd « milligran/ (decimeter) 2/day
mpy - mils penetration/year.
Ml
M2
M9
M10
M3
M4

Mil
M12
M5
M6

M13
M14

M7
M8
M15
M16


*


Temp, F
130
130
130
130
130
130

130
130
130
130

130
130

130
130
130
130




Exposure,
days
2
2
7
7
2
2

7
7
2
2

7
7

2
2
7
7




Corrosion
mdd
602
595
391
416
144
150

513 .
325
80.9
100

175
267

246
180
233
230




Rate(a)
mpy Remarks
120 Mottled brown color. General
119 corrosion.
78.2 Light and dark brown. General
83.1 corrosion.
28.8 Mottled brown color. Mostly
30.0 general corrosion with some
pitting. (<0.5 mil depth).
103 Light reddish-brown. General
65.0 corrosion.
16.2 Mottled brown color. Mostly
20.0 general corrosion with trace
of pitting (<0.5 mil depth).
34.9 Light-brown and black deposit.
53.3 Mostly general corrosion
with a little localized.
49.0 Localized and general corrosion.
35.9
46.5 Encrusted brown, gray, and black
45.9 deposit. Mostly general
corrosion with more intense
localized.



-------
      Table 24.   Coupon-Weight-Loss  Data for Cast Iron Soil Pipe in Soiled STPP  and NTA-Based Detergents
Detergent Concentration, Hardness,
weight percent ppm Coupon
0.12 of 50 wt. percent 15 M17
NTA-based detergent M18


150 M19
M20

0.12 of 50 wt. percent 15 M21
STPP-based detergent M22


150 M23
M24

Temp, F
130
130


130
130

130
130


130
130

Exposure,
days
2
2


2
2

2
2


2
2

(a)
Corrosion Rate
mdd
383
354


227
147

175
280


74.8
45.2

mpy
76.6
70.8


45.4
29.4

35.1
56.0


15.0
9.0

Remarks
Light and reddish-brown.
Localized corrosion up to
0.4 mil deep and pits up
to 0.2 mil deep.
Light brown non-adherent
deposit. Large areas of
localized corrosion.
Yellow and light brown de-
posit. Localized corrosion
up to 0.4 mil deep and pits
up to 0.2 mil deep.
Pale yellow, poorly adherent
deposit. Mild general
corrosion.
(a)  mdd = milligram/(decimeter)  /day.
    mpy = mils penetration/year.

-------
 In the 2-day exposure period, the soft-water condition was  more  corrosive
 in NTA solutions at 120 mils per year than STPP solutions with a  rate of
 about 18 mils per year.  In the hard-water condition,  however, the  STPP
 solution was slightly more corrosive at 43 mils per year compared to 30
 mils per year with NTA solution.  Figure 38(a)  shows the typical  appearance
 of coupons M1/M2, M3/M4, M5/M6, and Figure 38 (b),  the appearance  of coupons
 M7/M8 in this series.
               P425        (a)                (b)

   FIGURE  38.   CAST-IRON  COUPONS  (a) M4 and (b) M8 AFTER EXPOSURE.

                Note general corrosion of M4 and mixed corrosion of M8.
From the data  in Table 23, it was apparent that the 7-day exposure in NTA
solutions  showed a  decrease  from 120 to 81 mils per year in soft-water
solution and an increase from 30 to 84 mils per year in hard-water solutions.
It appeared that,  in 7 days, corrosion rates of 81 to 84 mils  per year
obtained were  independent of water hardness.  The decrease in  corrosion
rate from  120  to 81 mils per year in the soft-water solutions  was un-
doubtedly  due  to the formation of a graphitized layer as shown by comparison
of Figures 39  and 40.   The formation of a thin graphitized layer was also
noted on coupons M13/M14 in the STPP solution.
                                  70

-------

              ,     ^      -             •   •
                    *.?
                        •v.  *
                   -

                                      *
                                    -r
         v
                                  •

      *

                           '

                   -
      C-3924


FIGURE 39.   CROSS SECTION OF COUPON Ml
250X
            Note genera 1,  even corrosion and  only  thin  graphitized layer.

      C-3925



FIGURE 40.  CROSS SECTION OF COUPON MlO



            Note the thick graphitized layer.
250X
                             71

-------
In STPP solutions,  the  7-day  exposure  indicated an increase of corrosion
rate from 18 to 44  mils per year in soft-water solutions and from 43 to 46
mils per year  in hard-water solutions.   Thus,  as for NTA solutions, the
7-day  exposure period gave corrosion rates that were independent of water
hardness.   The rates of 44 to 46 mils per year in the STFF solutions were
much lower, however, than the rates of 81 to 84 mils per year in the NTA
 solutions.   The independence  of corrosion rate with water hardness was
 probably due to controlled dissolution through surface films which more
 readily occurred in NTA solutions.  X-ray diffraction of the deposit from
 coupons M7/M8, however, failed to show the presence of crystalline corrosion
 products.

 The weight-loss data in Table 23 is summarized in Figure 41 to allow
 evaluation of the  increased  corrosivity factors of NTA solutions over
 corresponding STPP solutions.  These factors are summarized in Table 25.
 The data in Table  25 indicated, with the exception of the hard-water
 condition  and 2-day exposure period, the NTA solutions were more corrosive

            Table 25.  IncreasedCorrosivity Factors for NTA Solutions
                      Over STPP  Solutions With Cast Iron
Detergent Concentration,
weight percent
0.12
0.12
Exposure,
days
2
7
15-ppm
Hardness
6.7
1.8
150-ppm
Hardness
1.8
       (a)  STPP solution more corrosive than NTA solution
  than corresponding STFP  solutions with increased corrosivity factors between
  1.8 and 6.7.   It appeared  that, with the occurrence of graphitized layers
  within the  7-day exposure  period, the corrosivity factor became equal in
  both hard-water  and soft-water solutions at a value of 1.8.

  A  number of coupons have been exposed to STPP and NTA solutions which have
  been deliberately  contaminated in order to simulate spent or soiled solutions
  which go to the  drain.   These solutions were made up using metal-salt
  additions of Fe2(804)3 • 6H20, CuSO^ - 5H20, ZnS04 • 7H20, PbS04, and A12(30^)3
  18H20 to 0.12  weight percent  detergent solutions in proportion to the pre-
  determined  corrosion rates of the corresponding metals in these solutions.
  These data  are summarized  in  Table 26.  The soft-water and hard-water NTA
  solutions were adjusted  to pH values of 8.8 and 9.3, respectively, after
  preparation and  the STPP solutions were adjusted to pH 9.3.  The pH values
  corresponded to  mean values of the 1020 steel and die-cast zinc used solutions
  in the corresponding detergents.  These pH values were selected since 1020
  carbon steel and die-cast  zinc suffered the most corrosion and would,
  therefore,  determine the pH conditions of soiled solutions.
                                 72

-------
                                                 15 ppm   150 ppm
                                                Hardness  Hardness
          0.12 weight percent  detergent concentration    o       •
o
a>
a>
CL

in
a>

"b
o:
 c
 o
'vt
 o
 w
 O
o
                                                             50 STPP

                                                              0 NTA
               STPP and NTA  Concentration,  weight percent
FIGURE  41
CORROSION RATE OF CAST IRON  AS A  FUNCTION  OF

STPP  AND NTA  CONCENTRATION  AT 15  PPM  AND

150 PPM  WATER  HARDNESS AND 130 F
                             73

-------
                     Table  26.   Summary  of  Data  for Preparation of Soiled Detergent Solutions
Base Detergent Solution
0.12 wt. percent of
50 wt. percent NTA
and 15-ppm hardness



0.12 wt percent of
50 wt. percent NTA
and 150-ppm hardness



0.12 wt. percent of
50 wt. percent STPP
and 15-ppm hardness



0.12 wt. percent of
50 wt. percent STPP
and 150-ppm hardness



Metal
Fe
Cu
Zn
Pb
Al
Fe
Cu
Zn
Pb
Al
Fe
Cu
Zn
Pb
Al
Fe
Cu
Zn
Pb
Al
Corrosion Rate,
mdd
294 (a)
11.8
178
125
2.87
120 (a)
10.9
96.7
105
1.64
r \

6.0
104
58.3
2.65
124(a)
3.0
56.5
61.3
1.62
Metal Loss /Coupon
In 2 Days, mg
117.3
4.7
76.0
52.9
1.1
47.8
4.4
41.2
44.4
0.6
16.2
2.4
44.4
24.7
1.0
49.4
1.2
24.2
26.0
0.6
Equivalent Weight of Metal Salt Added
To 150 Ml Detergent Solution, mg
537.2 Fe2(S04>3 6H20
18.5 CuS04 5 H20
334.4 ZnS04 7H20
77.2 PbS04
13.6 A10(SO,)0 18H00
2 4 j i
218.9 Fe2(S04)3 6H20
17.3 CuS04 5H20
181.3 ZnS04 7H20
64.8 PbS04
7.4 A1_(SO,)0 18H00
243 2
74.2 Fe2(S04)3 61^0
9.4 CuS04 5H20
195.4 ZnS04 7H20
36.1 PbS04
12.3A12(S04)3 18H20
226.3 Fe_(SO,)~ 6H.O
£, *T "^ *•
4.7 CuSO, 5H 0
4 *£
106.5 ZnSCh 7H 0
38.0 PbS04
7.4 A12(S04>3 18 H_0
(a)  1020 Carbon steel.

-------
The coupon-corrosion data for simulated soiled solutions are given in Table
24.  Comparison of this weight-loss data to the 2-day weight-loss data in
Table 23 for unsoiled solutions showed no consistent trends due to soiling.
Thus, in NTA solutions in the soft-water condition, the corrosion rate
decreased from 120 to 74 mils per year, but in hard water the corrosion rate
increased from 29 to 37 mils per year with soiling.  In STPP solutions and
soft water the corrosion rate increased from 18 to 46 mils per year, but in
hard waters the corrosion rate decreased from 45 to 12 mils per year with
soiling.  In the soiled solutions, it was evident, however, that the NTA
solutions were more corrosive than the corresponding STPP solutions.  In
the soft-water solutions, the increased corrosivity factor was 1.6, and
in hard-water solutions, 3.1.  A greater increase in corrosivity of NTA
solutions was observed in hard-water solutions, i.e., solutions of greater
Cl" content.

Corrosion products on coupons M17/M18 and M21/M22 from the NTA and STPP
solutions, respectively, were found to contain principally 6 -FeOOH.
However, M17/M18 contained Fe-jO^ anda-NaFeC^ in small additions to the
main phase- of 6-FeOOH.
                                 75

-------
                            SECTION IX
                            DISCUSSION
Corrosion studies have been conducted on a variety of materials of construction
associated with laundering:  1100 Aluminum, 260 Brass, electrolytic copper,
die-cast zinc, Type 304 stainless steel,  201 Nickel,  Type 420 stainless steel,
chemical lead, and cast iron in a number of STPP- and NTA-based detergent
solutions.  The solutions were prepared as representative of heavy-duty
granular detergents; i.e., 50-weight percent STPP or NTA at detergent con-
centrations of 0.06, 0.12, and 0.18 weight percent as likely to be employed
by the average housewife in washing machines.  The use of water of hardness
values 15 and 150 ppm to relate to soft and hard water respectively,  and
solution temperatures of 130 and 160 F was also designed to represent con-
ditions most  likely to be met under laundering conditions.  Coupon-weight-
loss data were the main source of corrosion-rate information but was  supple-
mented by limited electrochemical "linear polarization" studies.

It was readily apparent from the corrosion results that the materials in-
vestigated could be classed into four groups with regard to corrosion
behavior in NTA and STPP-based detergents.

Group I included materials having very low corrosion rate in NTA and  STPP
solutions of  the order of 0.01 to 0.15 mil per year.   In this group were
the materials in the following order of decreasing corrosion resistance:
Type 304 stainless steel, 201 Nickel, and Type 420 stainless steel.

Group II included materials of moderate corrosion resistance with pene-
tration of 0.2 to 3 mils per year.  In this group were the materials:
-260 Brass, electrolytic copper, and 1100 Aluminum which were quite similar
with respect  to their corrosion rates.

Group III included materials having poor corrosion resistance on the  order
of 2 to 60 mils per year.  In this group were chemical lead, die-cast zinc,
and 1020 carbon steel.  Of these, chemical lead was slightly more corrosion
resistant.

Group IV was represented by cast-iron soil pipe which had an extremely
poor corrosion resistance material giving corrosion rates between 16 and
120 mils per year in the uncoated condition.

The materials within each of the above groups and the order of the groups
with regard to corrosion behavior are as expected considering the usual
corrosion behavior of the materials studied.  Thus, it has been found that
the usually very inert stainless steel and nickel materials are also  the
most corrosion resistant in the detergent solutions.   On the other hand,
the active base materials such as zinc alloys and carbon steel have been
found to have poor corrosion resistance in the detergents.  Copper, brass,
and aluminum have shown the expected intermediate character for these materials.
                                76

-------
As might be predicted from electrochemical theory, the group classification
of the materials with regard to corrosion rates was closely paralleled by
the corrosion potentials of the various materials.  Thus,  Group I materials
exhibited noble corrosion potentials of about -0.2 to -0.3 volt,  Group III
materials exhibited active corrosion potentials of about -0.6 to -0.9 volt,
and Group II were of intermediate behavior with corrosion potentials of
-0.2 to -0.4 volt.

In almost all experiments, it was found that the soft-water condition of
15-ppm hardness was more corrosive than the corresponding solution with
hard water of 150-ppm hardness at a given detergent concentration.  As
discussed in Appendix B, the greater corrosivity of softer water is well
established; the above results follow the usual trend.  The greater
corrosivity of the softer water was due to the greater concentration of
builder component; i.e., STPP or NTA available from the detergent.  In
harder water, some of the STPP or NTA is used to soften the water by
sequestering the magnesium and calcium ions and, therefore, is no longer
available as a corrosion stimulator.  Also, in softer water, the formation
of protective magnesium and calcium scales is diminished.

In addition to the softer water being more corrosive for the investigated
materials, it was also apparent that for any given water hardness, the
corrosivity of the solutions increased with increase of detergent concen-
tration from 0.06, 0.12 to 0.18 weight percent.  This increase in corrosion
rate was, in part, due to the increased availablility of sequestering
compound for the corrosion process but probably also due to the associated
increase of pH and decrease of specific resistance of the solutions as
shown in Table 27.  The increase of pH with increase of concentration was

          Table 27.  Specific Resistivity and pH Data for Detergent
                     Solutions at Room Temperature
50 Wt. Percent NTA
Detergent Concentration,
weight
percent
0.06

0.12

0.18


Hardness,
ppm
15
150
15
150
15
150


pH
10.3
9.9
10.6
10.4
10.6
10.6
Detergent
Specific Resis-
tivity, ohm cm
1800
1800
1000
950
650
700


PH
10.0
9.8
10.4
10.1
10.3
10.2
50 Wt. Percent
STPP Detergent
Specific Resis-
tivity ohm cm
1600
1500
1000
900
650
600
probably due to the greater amount of OH  formed through the hydrolysis of
the STEP and NTA which are salts of weak acids and strong bases.  It is
apparent from Table 27 that NTA solutions were always slightly more
alkaline by about 0.2 to 0.4 pH units than the corresponding  STPP
                                77

-------
solutions.   This behavior was not due to a higher molar concentration of
NTA at 50 weight percent builder since the molar ratio was 1.34 in favor
of STPP, but was the result of the greater hydrolysis of the NTA detergent.
The slightly smaller specific resistivities of the STPP solutions are
probably associated with the larger ionic mobilities of the electrical
species.  The increased pH of the solutions would, of course, be less
favorable to the amphoteric metals; e.g., aluminum,  die-cast zinc,  lead,
and, tentatively, brass because of its zinc content, since these materials
are strongly corroded in very alkaline solutions.  Increased conductance
favors corrosion processes by more readily allowing ionic transport in the
solutions and the establishment of electrochemical cells on the surface
of the materials.  These data indicate that in either STPP-or NTA-based
detergents, the use of higher-than-average detergent concentration (1 cup
per 17-gallon washing machine) would favor increased corrosion.  Lower-
than-average detergent concentrations would be less corrosive.  In all
cases, however, soft make-up water could be more corrosive.

In addition to the soft water and increase of detergent concentration
giving rise to higher corrosion rates, it was apparent that the NTA
solutions in these conditions were almost always more corrosive than the
corresponding STPP solutions.  As discussed earlier, this behavior may be
due, in part, to the higher pH values of these solutions.  However, the
most plausible explanation is that it is related to the greater sequestering
power of NTA discussed in Appendix B.  The increased corrosivity of the
NTA solutions over STPP solutions was readily shown by the calculated
increased corrosivity factors for the materials.  These factors can be
used to indicate how much more corrosive NTA detergent solutions are than
corresponding STPP detergent solutions.  These factors would thus also
relate to the increased metal-ion pickup of the NTA detergent solutions
or  STPP detergent solutions as seen by a sewer treatment plant.  The
corrosivity factors are summarized in Table 28 for the least corrosion

       Table 28.  Summary of Increased Corrosivity Factors for  NTA
                  Solutions Over Corresponding STPP Solutions


    	Metal	Increased Corrosivity Factor

    1100 Aluminum                            1.0 to 1.3
    260 Brass                                1.3 to 5.0
    Electrolytic Copper                      1.5 to 3.8
    Die-Cast Zinc                            1.3 to 4.7
    1020 Steel                               1.0 to 7.1
    Chemical Lead                            1.0 to 3.1
    Cast Iron                                1.6 to 6.7
resistant metals of the construction materials employed in laundering.  These
factors were determined from weight-loss data for detergent solutions most
likely to be employed by the housewife and at the average hot-water wash
temperature of 130 F.  The data clearly show the increased corrosivity of
the NTA solutions.  The increased corrosivity was particularly marked for
cast iron and 1020 carbon steel and to a lesser extent for die-cast zinc
                                78

-------
and 260 Brass.  Electrolytic copper and chemical lead showed a smaller in-
crease in corrosion rate and 1100 Aluminum was only very slightly effected.
It is apparent, that for conditions corresponding to this work, the NTA
detergent solutions could contain as much as 7 times more metal ions due to
corrosion that would be brought about by similar STPP detergent solutions.

As shown in Table 28, cast-iron material, representative of uncoated cast-
iron soil pipe, showed the greatest corrosivity factor.  The high initial
corrosion rates of 16 to 120 mils per year were reduced to 44 to 84 mils
per year on longer exposure periods as graphitization occurred.  It should
be noted, of course, that the sewer pipe is supplied with a thin asphalt
coating which affords some degree of protection for a short period.  The
corrosivity factors and corrosion rates, however, are applicable to the as-
supplied pipe in undiluted detergent solutions.  Corrosion of cast iron was
still high at rates between 12 and 74 mils per year with simulated soiled
detergent solutions thus indicating the inherent high corrosion susceptibility
of this uncoated material.

It should be noted that the NTA and STPP detergent formulations used in these
studies did not contain corrosion inhibitors as might normal detergents.
Thus, the formulations used here would probably be more corrosive than the
corresponding commercial detergents.  However, since neither NTA nor the
STPP detergent formulations used in the studies contained corrosion in-
hibitors, the relative corrosivity of the solutions should be significant
and relate to the behavior of the corresponding commercial detergent
formulations.

With the exception of die-cast zinc and 1020 carbon steel, the corrosion
behavior of the investigated materials was usually in the form of general
even corrosion for both STPP and NTA solutions.  However, die-cast zinc
exhibited pitting corrosion in many experiments.  The pitting was usually
more severe in the solutions representative of the average detergent strength
used by the housewife (i.e., 0.12 weight percent detergent).  Furthermore,
the pitting corrosion extended as fine corrosion paths below the pits.  It
is doubtful that the pitting rates of 180 to 540 mils per year measured
over 2 days' exposure would be sustained at this rate, but the inherent
susceptibility of this material is indicated.  1020 steel exhibited localized
attack in STPP and NTA solutions representative of average and greater than
average detergent concentrations (i.e., 0.12 and 0.18 weight percent).
This corrosion, however, was usually not deep and the associated etched
appearance did not penetrate into the material intergranularly as  the Surface
appearance suggested.  Although 260 Brass corroded in many STPP solutions,
it was apparent that some dezincification occurred.  The dezincification
was confined  to the  surface and did not penetrate into the material.  The
dezincification may  be associated with a limited solution pH range of about
9.9 to 10.4.

Linear polarization measurements to evaluate corrosion rates did not
correlate well with weight-loss data with the exception of results for
1020 carbon steel and probably Type 304 and 420  stainless steel and 201
Nickel.  Because of  good  overall precision of the weight-loss  data using
duplicate samples,  it was concluded that weight-loss data were the most
significant.  The poor correlation with weight-loss data in terms  of
measured corrosion rates was probably due to the formation of  poorly con-
ducting  films  on the materials.  The films gave a low assessment of corrosion
rate in  this method  which effectively depends on measuring the electrical


                                79

-------
resistance of the corrosion process.  Using the results of this method to
compare behavior within a given system, it appeared that the use of mixed
37.5 STPP-1.25 NTA-based detergents did not significantly change corrosion
behavior over that noted for the pure 50 STPP- or 50 SNTA-based detergents.

Since the joint statement  (Appendix A) on December 18, 1970, by the En-
vironmental Protection Agency Administrator and the Surgeon General, con-
cerning the voluntary removal of NIA from detergents, a variety of phosphate
and NTA "free" detergents have appeared on the market.  These products
appear to be based upon  soda ash, silicates, borax, or polyelectrolytes
or mixtures of these with other minor ingredients.^  The corrosivity of
such  detergent formulations to materials used in laundering and sewer systems
was not determined from  a  scan of the open literature, and thus some con-
cern  must be expressed for their use.
                                80

-------
                             SECTION X


                          ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was performed under EPA, WQO Contract No. 14-12-943.  Liaison
was maintained with Mr. Charles E. Myers, Project Officer, of the Division of
Process Research and Development, WQO, EPA.  The support of the project by
the WQO, EPA, under the guidance of Mr. Charles E. Myers, is acknowledged
and appreciated.

The provision of the basic ingredients for preparation of the heavy-duty
granular detergents and useful advice by The Procter & Gamble Company,
Cincinnati, Ohio, is appreciated.
                                 81

-------
                            SECTION XI
                            REFERENCES
1.  "World Soap,  Detergent  Production",  Soap and Chemical Specialities,  46,
    40 (1970).

2.  "More Information on Detergents/Phosphates Issued", Clean Air and Water,
    News, 2,  (38),  9 (1970).

3.  "Preparing,  Cleaning, and Evaluating Corrosion Test Specimens",  ASTM,
    Gl-67 (1967).

4.  Stern, M.,  and Geary, A.  L.,  "Electrochemical Polarization",  J.  Electro-
    chem. Soc.,  104, 56 (1957).

5.  "Standard Reference Method for Making Potentiostatic and Potentiodynamic
    Anodic Polarization Measurements", ASTM, G5-69 (1969).

6.  "Moving in Fast on a Market  that is  Up for Grabs", Chemical Week, 11,
    January 6 (1971).
                                 82

-------
                            SECTION XII
                             GLOSSARY
Builder - A substance added to or used with detergents to increase  their
cleaning action.

Descaling - The removal of corrosion products from a corroded specimen, with
a minimum removal of base metal so that underlying base metal can be  examined
and/or metal weight loss can be determined.

Detergent - Any of numerous synthetic water-soluble or liquid-organic prep-
arations that are chemically different from soaps but resemble them in the
ability to emulsify oils and hold dirt in suspension.

Dezincifica tion - Corrosion of a zinc containing alloy, usually brass,  in-
volving loss of zinc and a residue or deposit in-situ of one or more  less
active constituents, usually copper.

General Corrosion - Corrosion producing uniform penetration of a surface.

Graphitization - Corrosion of gray cast iron in which the metallic  constituents
are converted to corrosion products leaving the graphite intact.

Linear Polarization - A method in which small potential changes AE  of the
order of lOmV applied to an electrode and the resultant current flow AI are
related through the linear relationship AE = RAI where R is a constant.
R, termed the "polarization resistance", is related to the corrosion rate
of the electrode material.  Thus, the linear polarization method enables
corrosion rates to be determined.

Localized Corrosion - Corrosion producing nonuniform penetration of a surface
which ranges from small areas of general corrosion to intense attack at one
or small areas.

pH - A measure of the hydrogen-ion concentration'of a sample which  represents
the logarithm of the reciprocal  (negative  logarithm) of the activity of
hydrogen ions calculated as follows:

                      PH = log 1/(H+) = -  log (H+),
where H  = activity of hydrogen  ions.

Pitting Corrosion - An extreme form of localized corrosion giving rise to
cavities or pits in the surface which have a small width-to-depth ratio
(approximately  less than 6:1).

Potentiodynamic - The technique  of varying the potential of an electrode  in
a continuous manner at a preset  rate.  It  is frequently employed to prepare
polarization plots.
                                83

-------
Sequestration - The formation of a soluble complex chemical from the
reaction of a simple metal ion with a complexing chemical species.

Specific Resistivity - The resistance in ohms measured between two
electrodes which cover opposite faces of a centimeter cube in aqueous
solution at a specific temperature.

Tafel Slope - Application of large potentials to an electrode frequently
yields a current-potential relationship over a region which can be
approximated by

                     E = a + bin/I/,

where E is the electrode potential
      I is the observed current density
      a and b are constants.

The constant b is known as the Tafel slope.
                                84

-------
                           SECTION XIII


                             APPENDIX


          A.  STATEMENT ON NTA, DECEMBER 18, 1970

                                                                   Page

BACKGROUND	         86

RECOMMENDATIONS  	         87



          B.  CORROSION EFFECTS OF NTA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE        87
              TO ITS USE AS A BUILDER TO REPLACE POLYPHOSPHATES
              IN DETERGENT FORMULATIONS

INTRODUCTION	         88

CHEMISTRY OF AMINO POLYCARBOXYLIC ACIDS	         88

NTA VERSUS POLYPHOSPHATES IN DETERGENTS  	         90

CORROSION REACTIONS OF NTA AND POLYPHOSPHATES  	         91

    Factors Affecting Corrosivity 	         91
    Use of Inhibitors	         91
    Examples of Corrosion Behavior  	         92

DISCUSSION	         93

REFERENCES	         94
                                 85

-------
             A.   STATEMENT  ON NTA,  DECEMBER 18,  1970
Environmental Protection Agency Administrator,  William D.  Ruckelshaus,  and
Surgeon General,  Jesse L. Steinfeld,  said today in a  joint statement:

    "We commend the major detergent manufacturers for their voluntary
    action to discontinue use of NTA  (nitrilotriacetic acid) in the
    manufacturing of detergents,  pending further tests and review of
    recently completed animal studies,  in order to protect the Nation's
    health from any potential hazard.   NTA,  a  chemical being substi-
    tuted for phosphates in some detergents, has been used in gradually
    increasing quantities to reduce the possible contribution of de-
    tergent phosphates to accelerated aging of surface waters in the
    environment.   The aging process,  known technically as  eutrophi-
    cation, results from excessive growth of aquatic plant life;
    overgrowth of algae and nuisance  aquatic weeds has a deleterious
    effect on aquatic life and can have severe impact on water
    quality.  Although the industry was urged  to make the substi-
    tution of NTA for phosphates, and NTA was  subjected to extensive
    testing, recently completed studies of the biological activity
    of NTA combined with heavy metals have raised concern that the
    projected uses of NTA may constitute a hazard to health."
                            BACKGROUND
Early studies, both those conducted by the Federal Water Quality Admin-
istration (FWQA) and the industry,  concentrated on the more conventional
kinds of toxicology studies using NTA alone.   The studies which provide
the basis for today's action were initiated in the National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences of the National Institutes of Health of the
Department of Health, Education, and Welfare  last spring at the request of
the FWQA, formerly of the Department of the Interior and now an agency of
the Environmental Protection Agency.  The NIEHS was asked to examine the
possibility of adverse reactions (birth abnormalities) secondary to ex-
posure to NTA itself or to NTA administered simultaneously with heavy
metals.  At the dosages employed in the NIEHS studies, which were consid-
erably higher than would ordinarily be encountered by the human population,
the administration of two heavy metals (cadmium and methyl mercury) si-
multaneously with NTA to two species of animals (rats and mice) yielded a
significant increase in embryo toxicity and congenital abnormalities in the
animals studied over the results with the same dosage of the metals alone.

NTA alters the toxicity of metals by affecting their entry, distribution,
and concentration in the tissues.  Of particular concern is the increased
rate of transmission of metals across the placenta to the fetus which
accounts for the fetal toxicity and congenital abnormalities produced in
animals in the NIEHS studies.  This potentiating effect of NTA with mecals,
together with the projected scale of use of NTA from today's beginning 100-
200 million pounds per year to as much as a billion or more pounds per
year over the next few years, was the basis for today's action.
                                86

-------
There is no evidence at this time to indicate that anyone has been or is
being harmed by the combination of NTA with metals in the environment.
However, prudence dictates not permitting a situation to develop in which
harm may occur to man from the effects of the projected uses of NTA.
                          RECOMMENDATIONS
Representatives of the major detergent manufacturers, though they have not
had an opportunity to analyze fully the NIEHS data, nevertheless have agreed
to discontinue use of NTA in the manufacture of soap and detergent products,
pending further tests and review of these and other studies.  Existing
supplies of NTA-detergent products may be  depleted through normal dis-
tribution.  We want to reemphasize that we have no evidence to indicate
that anyone has been harmed or is being harmed by these products.

However, there are certain areas where prudence would dictate that these
products should not be used.  ¥e recommend that NTA-detergent products
not be used in certain limited areas which have both well water supplies and
septic tanks, and in which these treatment systems are operating under
completely anaerobic conditions and where short-circuiting of septic tank
effluent directly into well supplies is occurring.  The products are:
Amway SA-8, Cheer, Gain, H.L.D., K-50, Laundri-Maid, Liquid All, Loft,
Phos-Free, Roundy's, Sav-us, Ultra, and Valley-Dew. (This list is not
complete).

In responding to one environmental problem, great care must be exercised
to assure that the alternative does not pose equal or greater hazards to
the environment or to human health.  This is certainly the case with de-
tergents in view of the massive quantities produced and ubiquitous nature
of their distribution.  It should be recognized that regulatory efforts by
Federal, State, and local officials must be conducted intelligently with
full awareness of potential secondary effects of those efforts.

As important as the prompt reduction of phosphates in detergents is in
reducing the load of algae nutrients in water, we must reluctantly conclude
that NTA does not appear to be an appropriate alternative at this time.
We continue  to urge that phosphates and other nutrients be removed from
waste waters by the application of proper waste treatment methods across
the country.  Additional studies of NTA are now underway, both by the
industry and within the Government.  Intensive study of other phosphate
substitutes will be necessary to assure, to the extent possible, that they
do not present a similar predicament.


         B.  CORROSION EFFECTS OF NTA WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO ITS
             USE AS A BUILDER TO REPLACE POLYPHOSPRATES IN DETERGENT
             FORMULATIONS
                                 87

-------
                           INTRODUCTION
Nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) originated in Germany during the 30's and was
first marketed under the name "Trilon A".-'-  Its use as a sequestering
agent, particularly in detergent formulations, was not economic until
recently.  During the 60's, more economical methods of manufacture were  ,, _
developed resulting in both a reduction in cost and greater availability. '
In recent years, the use of NTA as a detergent builder has expanded rapidly.
As a detergent builder,  best results are obtained when it is used to re-
place part but not all of the polyphosphate in the detergent mix.   However,
it appears more difficult to process NTA into detergent formulations.-*
              CHEMISTRY OF AMINO POLYCARBOXYLIC ACIDS
Of the amino polycarboxylic acids, EDTA (ethylene diamine tetracetic acid)
is the best known and most widely used. >"~°  The related product NTA
(nitrilotriacetic acid) has only recently become widely known.2  The
chemical structure of the trisodium salt of NTA is shown in Figure 1.

NTA has a capability similar to EDTA to sequester metal ions.  Details of
the chelating chemistry of NTA is rather limited; however, one can obtain
an approximate idea of its chemical performance by studying the behavior
of EDTA.

The sodium salts of EDTA and NTA are highly soluble.  For the trisodium
salt of NTA, saturation in water is reached atabout 40 percent by weight.1
Similarly the solubility of the tetrasodium salt of EDTA is about 51 per-
cent by weight. 10  As might be expected, each of these sodium salts, which
is the salt of a weak acid, has a strong alkaline reaction.

EDTA will sequester almost every polyvalent metal in the periodic table.
Usually the molecular ratio of the metal ion chela ted to EDTA is one
to one.   Similarly NTA will complex or chelate most, polyvalent cations.2
The metal is bound into the chelate structure by both ionic and covalent
bonds forming an extremely stable complex.  This effectively deactivates
the metal and eliminates the detrimental effects often caused by metal
ions in aqueous systems.

The sequestering activity is affected by the pH since there is competition
between hydrogen ions and metal ions.  At high pH, say 10 and above, the
complexing of metal ions is most effective.

In hard waters, NTA (or EDTA) will, in effect, soften the water by the
removal of calcium and magnesium ions from solution. This action prevents
the formation of insoluble soaps and precipitates.  The alkaline earth
complexes are highly stable.  The reaction of NTA and EDTA in sequestering
calcium is shown in Figure 2.2  On a weight basis, NTA will chelate almost
50 percent more calcium ions than will EDTA.  However, the stability con-
stant for any given NTA-sequestered cation is invariably lower than that
for the same EDTA-sequestered cation.  This may require an excess above the
stoichiometric amount of NTA to insure completion of the sequestering
action in some applications.2


                                88

-------
                   CH2—C—ONo
                  /       0
                /       /
               N—CH2—C—ONo
                \         0
                  \      /
                   CH2—C—ONa
                                                               .CH,COONo              ,CH2COOV
                                                      NoOOCCH2-N       +Co**-*NoOOCCH2-N	-/Co + 2Nof
                                                               CH2COONo             ^w.rnn/
                                                     C.V.- 389mg.Co COj/g m.
                                                     or 2-57 parts NTANa3:1 part CaCOz
NoOOCCHZv       ,CH2COONa    NoOOCCH2x
       VNCH2CH2N'      *Co+*      N
NaOOCCHg        "CH2COONa       H2C  \t   ,'  CH2
                                COO-Ca'-OOC
             C.V.=263mgCaC03/gm.
             or 3.80 parts EDTANa^ I port CaCOj
                                                                                 CH2COONa
    FIGURE I.  STRUCTURE OF THE TRISODIUM
              SALT OF NTA (TRISODIUM
              NITRILO TRIACETATE (9)
                                         FIGURE 2.  CHELATING CAPACITY OF THE SODIUM
                                                   SALT OF NTA COMPARED WITH THE
                                                   SODIUM SALT OF EDTA (2)
       400

       350

       300

       250

       200

       150

       100

        50
             SEQUESTRATION OF CALCIUM
                     AT 149 °F
               (O.I%Na2C204 indicator)
mg-CoCOj/gm.
                  NTANoi
                   STPP
                   TSPP
          5  6  7   8   9  10  I!  12
                     pH

FIGURE 3. A COMPARISON OF THE SEQUES-
         TRATION OF CALCIUM BY NTA
         AND BY POLYPHOSPHATES AT
         DIFFERENT pH LEVELS (2)
                © 0.75gm STPP
                © 0.45 gm NTANo3H20
                <3> 0.60 gm NTANa3H20
                  in 100 ml H20
                  water hordness=l50 ppm
                                                     12345
                                                      HCI, milliequivalents
                                           FIGURE 4.  BUFFER CAPACITY OF NTA
                                                     VERSUS TRISODIUM
                                                     POLYPHOSPHATE (STPP) (2)
                                               89

-------
               NTA VERSUS POLYPHOSPHATES IN DETERGENTS


Polyphosphates, as well as NTA, are more effective in sequestering calcium
at the higher pH levels.  At 140 F and at a pH of 10 and above, it can be
seen from Figure 3 that the trisodium salt of NTA is roughly twice as
effective as STPP and three times as effective as the tetrasodium pyro-
phosphate (TSPP) in sequestering calcium. 2  of concern in its effect on
the corrosion environment is NTA's buffering capacity.  As can be seen in
Figure 4, it requires more acid to lower the pH from say 11 to 8, with NTA
in solution than is the case with STPP.2  Thus the sequestering capability
of NTA in alkaline solution is less readily disturbed.

In the typical detergent formula, NTA can be used to replace part or all
of the polyphosphate.  NTA achieves a higher brightness level on fabrics
than does STPP at about one-half the quantity of builder.2  Other benefits
of NTA as a builder in detergent formulation include (a) lower mineralization
of cotton fabric washed in hard water compared to results when using STPP
as a builder, (b) good foam stabilization, (c) improved rinsability of
detergent components from fabrics and hard surfaces because of the greater
solubility of NTA versus STPP, (d) stabilization of minor ingredients such
as bleaches, brightners, and sanitizing a gents. 2>3>5

The important differences between the amino acid chelating agents; e.g.,
NTA and  the polyphosphates,
 (1)  The amino acids can combine with a wider range of polyvalent metal
 ions than the polyphosphates.

 (2)  The polyphosphates tend to revert to the simple phosphate form as
 the result of excessive acid or alkaline conditions.  High temperatures
 also increase this tendency.  For detergents normally packaged in powdered
 form, this instability is usually not a factor but for concentrated liquid
 detergents, formulators often elect to omit the polyphosphate because of
 stability problems.

 (3)  Polyphosphates exhibit a so-called threshold effect, a characteristic
 not present in amino acid compounds.  A few parts per million of poly-
 phosphate will keep much larger molar quantities of chemical compounds,
 which would otherwise tend to precipitate, in solution.

 Because the effects of NTA and STPP, as builders, are not identical, the
 most effective detergent formulations incorporate a combination of both
 products. 2>3  A molar ratio of sodium tripolyphosphate to sodium nitrilo-
 triacetate of 3:1 to 1:3 is found to give good results.^
                                 90

-------
           CORROSION REACTIONS OF NTA AND POLYPHOSPHATES
Polyphosphates have been used in water systems for scale control and for
inhibition of steel corrosion.   Protection appears to be the result of the
deposition of a film at the cathodic sites.12

Under the alkaline conditions and concentrations used in detergent solutions,
polyphosphates are found to be corrosive to alloys of aluminum,  zinc,  and
to copper-nickel-zinc alloys (German silvers).^  When NTA is substituted
for polyphosphate, the same metals are affected.

Factors Affecting Corrosivity

NTA solutions can be expected to be corrosive to metals because of the
following factors:

(1)  NTA ties up the alkali-metal ions, particularly calcium, into soluble
complexes.  This prevents the formation of protective scales, such as
calcium carbonate, in effect, allows corrosion to proceed.

(2)  As metal ions from corrosion reactions enter solution they are se-
questered by the NTA.  This prevents the formation of protective films of
corrosion products.  Existing films may be sequestered by the NTA and
thus removed.  In addition, the low concentration of unsequestered metal
ions in solution stimulates the corrosion reaction by preventing the
attainment of equilibrium.

(3)  NTA penetrates a variety of protective films formed by corrosion
inhibitors.4

Many of these reactions are similar to those of the polyphosphates.  Phos-
phates complex calcium ions (Item 1 above) and also sequester metal ions
from corrosion reactions  (Item 2).13  On the other hand, the presence of
low levels of polyphosphate, unlike NTA, will often increase the effective-
ness of an inhibitor.

Use of Inhibitors

One problem with high levels of polyphosphates  in detergent solutions has•
been the tendency  toward  corrosion of  the  "white metals".  The necessity for
the inhibition of  phosphate-bearing detergents  is well established.4  For
example, aluminum  corrosion can be inhibited by adding silicates.^>14
Without the silicates, the polyphosphates will maintain a fresh surface
for initial attack.  The  proper silicate,  if added, will be chemisorbed on
the metal and prevent further sequestration.  It is found that aluminum
corrosion is effectively  inhibited by  sodium silicate having a ratio of
Si02 : Na20 of about 1.6.^,14  The inhibition of corrosion of copper-
nickel-zinc alloys in phosphate containing detergents can be accomplished
by benzotriazole. 4
                                                                   3
Neither of the above inhibitors is effective toward zinc or "Zamak"  with
either polyphosphate or NTA as builders.   The corrosion rate can be inhibited
to an acceptable range by the addition of  an alkyl phosphonate according
to a British pa tent.4

                                91

-------
      Table  1.  Corrosion of Zamak 3^a) by Detergent(b)  Containing Sodium
               Nitrilotriacetate (NTA) With and Without Inhibitor(c)
               After  6  Hours  in Agitated Solutions at 140 F.4
                                               Loss  in Mg/Sq  Dm/Day
Detergent Concentration
0.27.
0.5%
Type of Water
HardW
Distilled
Inhibited
39
238
Uninhibited
355
688
(a) Nominal composition,  4 Al,  0.04 Mg,  remainder Zn.
(b) See Table 2,  for composition.
(c) Inhibitor is  "0.3 percent  of random octadecyl phosphonic acid prepared
    by adding phosphorous acid to  a random mixture of  octadecenes using
    gamma radiation as a  source of radicals".
(d) Hardness = 8.4 grains per  imperial  gallon or 120 ppm.
See Table 1 for composition of Zamak.


Examples of Corrosion Behavior

The composition of a detergent containing NTA  is  given in Table 2.

    Table 2.  Composition of a Spray-Dried Granular Detergent Containing
              NTA in Percent by Weight^


	Percent

Sodium straight chain alkyl benzene sulphonate having an average        13.3
 chain length of 13 carbon atoms
Sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP)                                          41.4
Sodium nitrilotriacetate (NTA)                                           9.6
Sodium silicate having a SiO£ : Na^O weight ration of 1.6               10.0
Marine oil fatty acids                                                   0.5
Tallow fatty acids                                                       1.5
Sodium carboxymethyIcellulose                                            0.33
Sodium sulfate                                                          11.26
Water                                                                   11.00
Miscellaneous ingredients including perfume,  optical brighteners,         L It
 and pigments
Note that the ratio of STPP to NTA is about 4:1.   The corrosion rates given
in Table 1 are for Zamak 3 in agitated detergent  solutions at 140 F for 6
hours.  The hard water (equivalent to 120 parts per million by weight)
                                92

-------
contained a 0.2 percent concentration of detergent by weight.   The "random
octadecyl phosphonic acid" inhibitor, at 0.3 percent strength,  reduced the
corrosion rate to about 1/9 of that of the uninhibited solution.   The in-
hibition in the distilled water solution with 0.5 percent detergent was
only partially effective.

In another experiment, aluminum and Zamak 3 were found to be corroded
by 0.35 percent detergent solutions, using the same two waters as in the
Zamak 3 tests above.  The detergent composition was:

            Sodium tetrapropylene benzene sulfonate    20%
            Sodium tripolyphosphate                    50%
            Sodium sulfate                             25%
            Inhibitor                                   5%

In this experiment, the exposure was for 3 hours at 140 F at a pH of 9.5.
Adding 5 percent phosphonic corrosion inhibitor, e.g., 10 nonadecyl phos-
phonic acid or pentadecyl benzyl phosphonic acid resulted in inhibition
not only for -aluminum but also for Zamak 3.

When NTA is substituted for the polyphosphate, the corrosion rates also are
unacceptable.  However, the attack on both metals is effectively inhibited
by phosphonic corrosion inhibitors.
                            DISCUSSION
Much of the literature on NTA discusses analytical techniques, problems of
sewerage treatment, efficiency as a detergent builder, and packaging
problems.  Corrosion data are almost nonexistent in the open literature.

One gathers from a study of detergents in general that there is an almost
endless variety on the market. Many of these detergent formulations tend to
be corrosive, and manufacturers of laundry and washing machines have found
it necessary to construct their units of corrosion-resistant materials. >14-1
The introduction of NTA for part of the polyphosphate does not appear to have
altered the situation as far as domestic washing machines are concerned.
A recent suggestion is to replace part of the polyphosphate builder-' by
increasing the amount of surface-active agent to partially compensate for
the change.  It is not easy to predict how these alterations in formulation
will reflect the corrosivity of detergent solutions to white metals such as
zinc and aluminum.  Builders such as sodium carbonate may be required to
maintain alkalinity.

No indication was found in the literature that NTA-bearing, spent-detergent
solutions are more corrosive to sewer lines and to sewerage plants than is
the case for phosphate-based detergents.
                                 93

-------
                             REFERENCES
 1.   Sisley,  J.  P.,  and Wood,  P. J., Encyclopedia of Surface-Active Agents,
     Vol.  _! (1952)  Chemical Pub. Co., N. Y.

 2.   Pollard, R. B., "Amino Acid Chelating Agents in Detergent Applications",
     Soap and Chemical Specialities, 42 (9), 58-62,  130-5 (1966).

 3.   Singer,  J.  J.,  "Chelating Agents in Detergents",  Coap and Chemical
     Specialties, 37 (10),  49-51, 125-6 (1961).

 4.   Zimmerer, R. E., "Detergent Composition", British Patent No. 1,131,738
     (October 23, 1968).

 5.   Kastra,  R.  D.,  "Formulating Detergents With Less Phosphate", Soap and
     Chem. Specialties, 47 (2), 36-42, 54-6, 107 (1971).

 6.   Smith, R. L.,  The Sequestration of Metals, Chapter V, MacMillan Co. (1959),

 7.   Dwyer, F. P.,  and Mellor, D. P., Chelating Agents and Metal Chelates,
     Chapter 7,  Academic Press, New York, N. Y. (1964).

 8.   Martell, A. E., "Complexing Agents", Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical
     Technology, 2nd Edition,  p 1-24 in Vol. 6, John Wiley (1965).

 9.   Shumate, K. S., Thompson, J. E., Brookhart, J.  D., and Dean, C. L.,
     "NTA Removal by Activated Sludge—Field Study", J. Water Poll. Control
     Fed., 42 (4),  631-640, (1970).

10.   The Merck Index, p 428,  Merck & Co. (1960).

11.   McGilvery,  J.  D., "STPP for Modern Detergents", Soap and Chemical
     Specialties, 40 (12),  241-3, 254-7 (1964).

12.   Hatch, G. B.,  "Influence of Inhibitors on the Differential Attack of
     Steel",  Corrosion, .21 (6), 179-87 (1965).

13.   Shen, C. Y., "Properties of Detergent Phosphates and Their Effects on
     Detergent Processing", J.Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 45,  510-16 (1968).

14.   Lange, K. R.,  "Recent Studies in the Roles of Silicate Builders in
     Detergent Formulations",  J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 45, 487-92 (1968).

15.   Chandler, R. H., "Corrosion Resistance of Vitreous Enamel", Corrosion
     Prevention and Control,  8 (8),  41-2 (1961).

16.   Stupel,  H., and Koch,  F., "Die Korrosion von Zinc durch Neuzeitliche
     Waschmittel" [The Corrosion of Zinc by Modern Detergents], Werkstoffe
     und Korrosion,  10 (1), 33-39 (I960).

17.   Mosle, H. G.,  Wolf, W.,  and Bode, W., "Untersuchung uber den Einfluss
     von Haushalts  Wasch Mitteln auf Metalle und von Metallen auf Haushalts-
     Waschmittel" [Investigation of the Effect of Domestic Detergents on
     Metals and of Metals on Detergents], Werkstoffe und Korrosion, 15 (2),
     130-4; (3), 221-227 (1964).
                                  94

-------
                               Subject
(1) Accession Number   (2) Field & Group
                 SELECTED WATER RESOURCES ABSTRACTS
                    Input Transaction Form
(5) Organization
             Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus Laboratories

(6) Title
             Corrosion Potential of NTA in Detergent Formulations
 (10) Author(s)
       Moreland, Peter J.
       Boyd, Walter K.
       Lutz, Garson A.
          (16)  Project Designation
                EPA, WQO  Contract No.  14-12-943
          (21)  Note
 (22) Citation
 (23)  Descriptors  (Starred First)  - corrosion, eutrophication, detergents,
          pollution, phosphates,  plumbing, metals, stainless steels
 (25)   Identifiers  (Starred First)
         NTA, STPP,  laundering equipment, polarization studies

 (27)   Abstract

     Laboratory  studies were conducted  to determine the corrosion potential of
 nitrilotriacetic acid  (NTA) as a  substitute  for  sodium tripolyphosphate (STPP)
 in  detergents.   Coupon-weight loss  and  linear  polarization studies were employed
 to  investigate the corrosion of  typical materials of construction which might
 be  subject  to exposure to NTA in normal use  in laundering.

     Detergent formulations were  used which  were representative of heavy-duty
 granular detergents.   Solutions  of  0.06, 0.12, Snd 0.18 weight percent using
 15- and 150-ppm  water  hardness and  temperatures  of 130 and 160 F represented
 laundering  conditions  used by the average housewife
     NTA-based detergents were more corrosive  by a factor between 1 and 7 to
 the materials 1100 Aluminum, 260 Brass, electrolytic  copper,  die-cast zinc,
 1020 carbon steel  and  chemical  lead.  Corrosion  was generally greatest in NTA
 and STPP solutions with  soft water.  In both soft and hard waters, corrosivity
 increased with increase  of detergent concentration.
     Types  304 and 420 stainless steel  and 201 Nickel were very corrosion re-
 sistant  (0.01 to 0.15  mil per year), 260 Brass,  electrolytic  copper and 1100
-Aluminum were moderately resistant  (0.2 to 3 mils per year) and die-cast zinc,
 1020 carbon steel  and  chemical  lead poorly corrosion  resistant at rates of 2
 to  60  mils  per year.   Cast iron  showed  extreme corrosion  in NTA solutions with
 corrosion rates  between  30 and  120  mils per  year. NTA detergents could increase
 metal  ion pickup at a  sewage plant  by a factor between 1  and  7.
 Abstractor
   Moreland,  Peter J.
Institution
    Battelle Memorial Institute,  Columbus Laboratories

-------