United Stales
Environmental Protection
Agency
Environmental Monitoring
and Support Laboratory
PO Box 15027
Las Vegas NV 89114
EPA-bOO-3 79-063
June 1979
Research and Development
Distribution of
Phytoplankton in
Kansas Lakes
-------
RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES
Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S Environmental
Protection Agency, have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad categories
were established to facilitate further development and application of environmental
technology. Elimination of traditional grouping was consciously planned to foster
technology transfer and maximum interface in related fields. The nine series are
1. Environmental Health Effects Research
2 Environmental Protection Technology
3. Ecological Research
4. Environmental Monitoring
5. Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
6. Scientific and Technical Assessment Reports (STAR)
7. Interagency Energy- Environment Research and Development
8. "Special" Reports
9- Miscellaneous Reports
This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH series. This series
describes research on the effects of pollution on humans,plant and animal species, and
materials. Problems are assessed for their long-and short-term influences. Investiga-
tions include formations, transport, and pathway studies to determine the fate of
pollutants and their effects This work provided the technical basis for setting standards
to minimize undesirable changes in living organisms in the aquatic, terrestrial, and
atmospheric environments.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Information
Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161
-------
EPA-600/3-79-063
June 1979
DISTRIBUTION OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN KANSAS LAKES
by
L. R. Williams, S. C. Hern, V. W. Lambou,
F. A. Morris*, M. K. Morris*, and W. D. Taylor
Water and Land Quality Branch
Monitoring Operations Division
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Las Vegas, Nevada 89114
*Department of Biological Sciences
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Las Vegas, Nevada 89154
ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND SUPPORT LABORATORY
OFFICE OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89114
-------
DISCLAIMER
This report has been reviewed by the Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory-Las Vegas, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and
approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does
not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.
-------
FOREWORD
Protection of the environment requires effective regulatory actions
which are based on sound technical and scientific information. This
information must include the quantitative description and linking of
pollutant sources, transport mechanisms, interactions, and resulting effects
on man and his environment. Because of the complexities involved, assessment
of specific pollutants in the environment requires a total systems approach
which transcends the media of air, water, and land. The Environmental
Monitoring and Support Laboratory-Las Vegas contributes to the formation and
enhancement of a sound monitoring data base for exposure assessment through
programs designed to:
• develop and optimize systems and strategies for monitoring
pollutants and their impact on the environment
• demonstrate new monitoring systems and technologies by
applying them to fulfill special monitoring needs of the
Agency's operating programs
This report presents the species and abundance of phytoplankton in the
15 lakes sampled by the National Eutrophication Survey in the State of
Kansas, along with results from the calculation of several commonly used
biological indices of water quality and community structure. These data can
be used to biologically characterize the study lakes, and as baseline data
for future investigations. This report was written for use by Federal,
State, and local governmental agencies concerned with water quality analysis,
monitoring, and or regulation. Private industry and individuals similarly
involved with the biological aspects of water quality will find the document
useful. For further information contact the Water and Land Quality Branch,
Monitoring Operations Division.
M*~-
George. Morgan
Director
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Las Vegas
in
-------
CONTENTS
Foreword ............................... 111
Introduction ............................. 1
Materials and Methods ........................ 3
Lake and Site Selection ..................... 3
Sample Preparation ....................... 3
Examination ........................... 4
Quality Control ......................... 5
Results ............................... 6
Nygaard's Trophic State Indices ................. 6
Palmer's Organic Pollution Indices ............... 6
Species Diversity and Abundance Indices ............. 8
Species Occurrence and Abundance ................ 1°
Literature Cited ........................... 11
Appendix A. Phytoplankton Species list for the State
of Kansas ........................ 12
Appendix B. Summary of Phytoplankton Data
-------
INTRODUCTION
The collection and analysis of phytoplankton data were included in the
National Eutrophication Survey in an effort to determine relationships between
algal characteristics and trophic status of individual lakes.
During spring, summer, and fall of 1974, the Survey sampled 179 lakes in
10 States. Over 700 algal species and varieties were identified and
enumerated from the 573 water samples examined.
This report presents the species and abundance of phytoplankton in the
15 lakes sampled in the State of Kansas (Table 1). The Nygaard's Trophic
State (Nygaard 1949), Palmer's Organic Pollution (Palmer 1969), and species
diversity and abundance indices are also included.
TABLE 1. LAKES SAMPLED IN THE STATE OF KANSAS
STORET No. Lake Name County ~
2001 Cedar Bluff Reservoir Trego
2002 Council Grove Morris
2003 Elk City Montgomery
2004 Fall River Reservoir Greenwood
2005 John Redmond Reservoir Coffey
2006 Kanopolis Reservoir Ellsworth
2007 Marion Reservoir Marion
2008 Melvern Reservoir Osage
2009 Mil ford Reservoir Clay, Geary, Riley
2010 Norton Reservoir Norton
2011 Perry Reservoir Jefferson
(Continued) ~~~~
-------
TABLE 1. LAKES SAMPLED IN THE STATE OF KANSAS (Continued)
STORET No. Lake Name County
2012 Pomona Reservoir Osage
2013 Toronto Reservoir Greenwood, Woodson
2014 Tuttle Creek Reservoir Marshall, Riley, Pottawatomie
2015 Wilson Reservoir Russell, Lincoln
-------
MATERIALS AND METHODS
LAKE AND SITE SELECTION
Lakes and reservoirs included in the Survey were selected through
discussions with State water pollution agency personnel and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Regional Offices (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1975). Screening and selection strongly emphasized lakes with actual or
potential accelerated eutrophication problems. As a result, the selection was
limited to lakes:
(1) impacted by one or more municipal sewage treatment plant outfalls
either directly into the lake or by discharge to an inlet tributary
within approximately 40 kilometers of the lake;
(2) 40 hectares or larger in size; and
(3) with a mean hydraulic retention time of at least 30 days.
Specific selection criteria were waived for some lakes of particular State
interest.
Sampling sites for a lake were selected based on available information on
lake morphometry, potential major sources of nutrient input, and on-site
judgment of the field limnologist (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1975).
Primary sampling sites were chosen to reflect the deepest portion of each
major basin in a test lake. Where many basins were present, selection was
guided by nutrient source information on hand. At each sampling site, a
depth-integrated phytoplankton sample was taken. Depth-integrated samples
were uniform mixtures of water from the surface to a depth of 15 feet
(4.6 meters) or from the surface to the lower limit of the photic zone
representing 1 percent of the incident light, whichever was greater. If the
depth at the sampling site was less than 15 feet (4.6 meters), the sample was
taken from just off the bottom to the surface. Normally, a lake was sampled
three times in 1 year, providing information on spring, summer, and fall
conditions.
SAMPLE PREPARATION
To preserve the sample 4 milliliters (ml) of Acid-LugoTs solution
(Prescott 1970) were added to each 130-ml sample from each site at the time of
collection. The samples were shipped to the Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada, where equal volumes from each site
-------
were mixed to form two 130-ml composite samples for a given lake. One
composite sample was put into storage and the other was used for the
examination.
Prior to examination, the composite samples were concentrated by the
settling method. Solids were allowed to settle for at least 24 hours prior to
siphoning off the supernate. The volume of the removed supernate and the
volume of the remaining concentrate were measured and concentrations
determined. A small (8-ml) library subsample of the concentrate was then
taken. The remaining concentrate was gently agitated to resuspend the
plankton and poured into a capped, graduated test tube. If a preliminary
examination of a sample indicated the need for a more concentrated sample, the
contents of the test tube were further concentrated by repeating the settling
method. Final concentrations varied from 15 to 40 times the original.
Permanent slides were prepared from concentrated samples after analysis
was complete. A ring of clear Karo® corn syrup with phenol (a few crystals of
phenol were added to each 100 ml of syrup) was placed on a glass slide. A
drop of superconcentrate from the bottom of the test tube was placed in the
ring. This solution was thoroughly mixed and topped with a coverglass. After
the syrup at the edges of the coverglass had hardened, the excess was scraped
away and the mount was sealed with clear fingernail polish. Permanent diatom
slides were prepared by drying sample material on a coverglass, heating in a
muffle furnace at 400° C for 45 minutes, and mounting in Hyrax®. Finally, the
mounts were sealed with clear fingernail polish.
Backup samples, library samples, permanent sample slides, and
Hyrax-mounted diatom slides are being stored and maintained at the
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory-Las Vegas.
EXAMINATION
The phytoplankton samples were examined with the aid of binocular
compound microscopes. A preliminary examination was performed to precisely
identify and list all forms encountered. The length of this examination
varied depending on the complexity of the sample. An attempt was made to find
and identify all of the forms present in each sample. Often forms were
observed which could not be identified to species or to genus. Abbreviated
descriptions were used to keep a record of these forms (e.g., lunate cell,
blue-green filament, Navicula ttl). Diatom slides were examined using a
standard light microscope. If greater resolution was essential to accurately
identify the diatoms, a phase-contrast microscope was used.
After the species list was compiled, phytoplankton were enumerated using
a Neubauer Counting Chamber with a 40X objective lens and a 10X ocular lens.
All forms within each field were counted. The count was continued until a
minimum of 100 fields had been viewed, or until the dominant form had been
observed a minimum of 100 times.
•Registered trademark
-------
QUALITY CONTROL
Project phycologists performed internal quality control intercomparisons
regularly on 7 percent of the species identification and counts. Although an
individual had primary responsibility for analyzing a sample, taxonomic
problems were discussed among the phycologists.
Additional quality control checks were performed on the Survey samples by
Dr. G. W. Prescott of the University of Montana at the rate of 5 percent.
Quality control checks were made on 75 percent of these samples to verify
species identifications while checks were made on the remaining 25 percent of
the samples to verify genus counts. Presently, the agreement between quality
control checks for species identification and genus enumerations is
satisfactory.
-------
RESULTS
A phytoplankton species list for the State is presented in Appendix A.
Appendix B summarizes all of the phytoplankton data collected from the State
by the Survey. The latter is organized by lake, and includes an alphabetical
phytoplankton species list with concentrations for individual species given by
sampling date. Results from the application of several indices are presented
(Nygaard's Trophic State, Palmer's Organic Pollution, and species diversity
and abundance). Each lake has been assigned a four-digit STORET number.
(STORET (STOrage and RETrieval) is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's
computer system which processes and maintains water quality data.) The first
two digits of the STORET number identify the State; the last two digits
identify the lake.
NYGAARD'S TROPHIC STATE INDICES
Five indices devised by Nygaard (1949) were proposed under the assumption
that certain algal groups are indicative of levels of nutrient enrichment.
These indices were calculated in order to aid in determining the surveyed
lakes' trophic status. As a general rule, Cyanophyta, Euglenophyta, centric
diatoms, and members of the Chlorococcales are found in waters that are
eutrophic (rich in nutrients), while desmids and many pennate diatoms
generally cannot tolerate high nutrient levels and so are found in
oligotrophic waters (poor in nutrients).
In applying the indices to the Survey data, the number of taxa in each
major group was determined from the species list for each sample. The ratios
of these groups give numerical values which can be used as a biological index
of water richness. The five indices and the ranges of values established for
Danish lakes by Nygaard for each trophic state are presented in Table 2. The
appropriate symbol, (E) eutrophic and (0) oligotrophic, follows each
calculated value in the tables in Appendix B. A question mark (?) following a
calculated value in these tables was entered when that value was within the
range of both classifications.
PALMER'S ORGANIC POLLUTION INDICES
Palmer (1969) analyzed reports from 165 authors and developed algal
pollution indices for use in rating water samples with high organic pollution.
Two lists of organic-pollution-tolerant forms were prepared, one containing
20 genera, the other, 20 species (Tables 3 and 4). Each form was assigned a
pollution index number ranging from 1 for moderately tolerant forms to 6 for
-------
TABLE 2. NYGAARO'S TROPHIC STATE INDICES ADAPTED FROM HUTCHINSON (1967)
Index
Calculation
Oligotrophic Eutrophic
Myxophycean
Chlorophycean
Di atom
Euglenophyte
Compound
Myxophyceae
Desmideae
Chlorococcales
Desmideae
Centric Diatoms
Pennate Diatoms
Euglenophyta
Myxophyceae + Chlorococcales
Myxophyceae + Chlorococcales +
0.0-0.4
0.0-0.7
0.0-0.3
0.0-0.2
0.0-1.0
0.1-3.0
0.2-9.0
0.0-1.75
0.0-1.0
1.2-25
Centric Diatoms + Euglenophyta
Desmideae
TABLE 3. ALGAL GENUS POLLUTION INDEX
(Palmer 1969)
TABLE 4. ALGAL SPECIES POLLUTION
INDEX (Palmer 1969)
Genus
Anacystis
Ankistrodesmus
Chlamydomonas
Chi orel la
Closterium
Cyclotella
Euglena
Gomphonema
Lepocinclis
Melosira
Micractinium
Navicula
Nitzschia
Oscillatoria
Pandorina
Phacus
Phormidium
Scenedesmus
Stigeoclonium
Synedra
Pollution
Index
1
2
4
3
1
1
5
1
1
1
1
3
3
5
1
2
1
4
2
2
Species
Ankistrodesmus falcatus
Arthrospira jenneri
Chlorella vulgaris
Cyclotella meneghiniana
Euglena gracilis
Euglena viridis
Gomphonema parvulum
Melosira varians
Navicula cryptocephala
Nitzschia acicularis
Nitzschia palea
Oscillatoria chlorina
Oscillatoria limosa
Oscillatoria princeps
Oscillatoria putrida
Oscillatoria tenuis
Pandorina morum
Scenedesmus quadricauda
Stigeoclonium tenue
Synedra ulna
Pollution
Index
3
2
2
2
1
6
1
2
1
1
5
2
4
1
1
4
3
4
3
3
-------
extremely tolerant forms. Palmer based the index numbers on occurrence
records and/or where emphasized by the authors as being especially tolerant of
organic pollution.
In analyzing a water sample, any of the 20 genera or species of algae
present in concentrations of 50 per milliliter or more are recorded. The
pollution index numbers of the algae present are totaled, providing a genus
score and a species score. Palmer determined that a score of 20 or more for
either index can be taken as evidence of high organic pollution, while a score
of 15 to 19 is taken as probable evidence of high organic pollution. Lower
figures suggest that the organic pollution of the sample is not high, that the
sample is not representative, or that some substance or factor interfering
with algal persistence is present and active.
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
"Information content" of biological samples is being used commonly by
biologists as a measure of diversity. Diversity in this connection means the
degree of uncertainty attached to the specific identity of any randomly
selected individual. The greater the number of taxa and the more equal their
proportions, the greater the uncertainty, and hence, the diversity (Pielou
1966). There are several methods of measuring diversity, e.g., the formulas
given by Brillouin (1962) and Shannon and Weaver (1963). The method which is
appropriate depends on the type of biological sample on hand.
Pielou (1966) classifies the types of biological samples and gives the
measure of diversity appropriate for each type. The Survey phytoplankton
samples are what she classifies as larger samples (collections in Pielou1s
terminology) from which random subsamples can be drawn. According to Pielou,
the average diversity per individual (H) for these types of samples can be
estimated from the Shannon-wiener formula (Shannon and Weaver 1963):
S
H = -E Pn. logx P1
1=1
where P is the proportion of the ith taxon in the sample, which is calculated
from n-j/N; nj is the number of individuals per milliliter of the ith
taxon; N is the total number of individuals per ml; and S is the total number
of taxa. However, Basharin (1959) and Pielou (1966) have pointed out that H
calculated from the subsample is a biased estimator of the sample H, and if
this bias is to be accounted for, we must know the total number of taxa
present in the sample since the magnitude of this bias depends on it.
Pielou (1966) suggests that if the number of taxa in the subsample falls
only slightly short of the number in the larger sample, no appreciable error
will result in considering S, estimated from the subsample, as being equal to
the sample value. Even though considerable effort was made to find and
identify all taxa, the Survey samples undoubtedly contain a fair number of
rare phytoplankton taxa which were not encountered.
8
-------
In the Shannon-Wiener formula, an increase in the number of taxa and/or
an increase in the evenness of the distribution of individuals among taxa will
increase the average diversity per individual from its minimal value ,of zero.
Sager and Hasler (1969) found that the richness of taxa was of minor
importance in determination of average diversity per individual for
phytoplankton and they concluded that phytoplankton taxa in excess of the 10
to 15 most abundant ones have little effect on H. This was verified by our
own calculations. Our counts are in number per milliliter and since
logarithms to the base 2 were used in our calculations, H is expressed in
units of bits per individual. When individuals of a taxon were so rare that
they were not counted, a value of 1/130 per milliliter or 0.008 per milliliter
was used in the calculations since at least one individual of the taxon must
have been present in the collection.
A Survey sample for a given lake represents a composite of all
phytoplankton collected at different sampling sites on the lake during a given
sampling period. Since the number of samples (M) making up a composite is a
function of both the complexity of the lake sampled and its size, it should
affect the richness-of-taxa component of the diversity of our phytoplankton
collections. The maximum diversity (MaxH) (i.e., when the individuals are
distributed among the taxa as evenly as possible) was estimated from logg S
(Pielou 1966), while the minimum diversity {MinH), was estimated from the
formula:
HlnH - -^10921- N^U ^ -L^ll
given by Zand (1976). The total diversity (D) was calculated from HN (Pielou
1966). Also given in Appendix B are L (the mean number of individuals per
taxa per milliliter) and K (the number of individuals per milliliter of the
most abundant taxon in the sample).
/n- i Tnertevenness component of diversity (J) was estimated from H/MaxH
(Pielou 1966). Relative evenness (RJ) was calculated from the formula:
RJ = H-MinH
MaxH-MinH
given by Zand (1976). Zand suggests that RJ be used as a substitute for both
J and the redundancy expression given by Wilhm and Dorris (1968). As pointed
out by Zand, the redundancy expression given by Wilhm and Dorris does not
properly express what it is intended to show, i.e., the position of H in the
range between MaxH and MinH. RJ may range from 0 to 1 ; being 1 for the most
even samples and 0 for the least even samples.
n Zand (1976) suggests that diversity indices be expressed in units of
sits , i.e., in logarithms to base S (where S is the total number of taxa in
the sample) instead of in "bits", i.e., in logarithms to base 2. Zand points
out that the diversity index in sits per individual is a normalized number
the T°st Tn1y Distributed samples to 0 for the least
eirtih,
even y distributed samples. Also, it can be used to compare different
samples, independent of the number of taxa in each. ThePdiversity in bits per
-------
individual should not be used in direct comparisons involving various samples
which have different numbers of taxa. Since MaxH equals log S, the expression
in sits is equal to logs S, or 1. Therefore diversity in sits per
individual is numerically equivalent to J, the evenness component for the
Shannon-Wiener formula.
SPECIES OCCURRENCE AND ABUNDANCE
The alphabetic phytoplankton species list for each lake, presented in
Appendix B, gives the concentrations of individual species by sampling date.
Concentrations are in cells, colonies, or filaments (CEL, COL, FIL) per
milliliter. An "X" after a species name indicates that the species identified
in the preliminary examination was in such a low concentration that it did not
appear in the count. A blank space indicates that the organism was not found
in the sample collected on that date. Column S is used to designate the
examiner's subjective opinion of the five dominant taxa in a sample, based
upon relative size and concentration of the organism. The percent column
presents, by abundance, the percentage composition of each taxon.
10
-------
LITERATURE CITED
Basharin, G. P. 1959. On a statistical estimate for the entropy of a
sequence of independent random variables, pp. 333-336. In: Theory of
Probability and Its Applications (translation of "Teoriya Veroyatnosei i
ee Premeneniya"). N. Artin (ed). 4. Society for Industrial and
Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia.
Brillouin, L. 1962. Science and Information Theory (2nd ed.). Academic
Press, New York. 351 pp.
Hutchinson, G. E. 1967. A Treatise on Limnology. II. Introduction to Lake
Biology and the Limnoplankton. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
1,115 pp.
Nygaard, G. 1949. Hydrobiological studies of some Danish ponds and lakes.
II. (K danske Vidensk. Selsk.) Biol. Sci. 7:293.
Palmer, C. M. 1969. A composite rating of algae tolerating organic
pollution. J. Phycol. 5:78-82.
Pielou, E. C. 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of
biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13:131-144.
Prescott, G. W. 1970. How to Know the Freshwater Algae. William C. Brown
Company, Dubuque. 348 pp.
Sager, P. E., and A. D. Hasler. 1969. Species diversity in lacustrine
phytoplankton. I. The components of the index of diversity
from Shannon's formula. Amer. Natur. 103(929):51-59.
Shannon, C. E., and W. Weaver. 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Commu-
nication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana. 117 pp.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1975. " National Eutrophication Survey
Methods 1973-1976. Working Paper No. 175. Environmental Monitoring and
Support Laboratory, Las Vegas, Nevada, and Corvallis Environmental
Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon. 91 pp.
Wilhm, V. L., and T. C. Dorris. 1968. Biological parameters for water
quality criteria. Bio-Science. 18:477.
Zand, S. M. 1976. Indexes associated with information theory in water
quality. J. Water Pollut. Contr. Fed. 48(8):2026-2031.
11
-------
APPENDIX A
PHYTOPLANKTON SPECIES LIST FOR THE STATE OF KANSAS
12
-------
Aotinastmm gpaeilimum
Anabaena sp.
Anabaenopsis sp.
Ankistradesmus falcatus
Ankistrodesmus falaatus
v. acioularis
Ankistrodesmus falaatus
v. mirabilis
Aphanizomenon flos-aquae
Asterionella formosa
Asterionella formosa
v. graaillima
Botr-yoooeeus sudetious
Carteria klebsii
Cevatium hirundinella
f. brachyoeras
Ceratiwn hirundinello.
f. furaoides
CeTati,wm 'hi,r>und'ine11a.
f. sootticum
Characium litmetiaum
Chapacium naegelii ?
Chlamydomonas globosa
Chlorogonium sp.
Chroomonas aouta
Closteriopsie sp.
Closterium sp.
Coaaoneis pediaulus ?
CoelastPum combr-ieum
v. intermedium
CoetastTwn miaroporwn
Coelaatrum reticulatum
Coelastwm reticulation
v. polyohordon
Coeloaphaeriwn naegelianum
Cosmaviwn. granatum
Crueigenia apiaulata
Crueigenia fenestvata,
Crucigenia quadrata
Cvucigenia tetrapedia
Cvyptomonas erosa
Cryptomonas erosa
v. peflexa
Cryptomonas marssonii
Cryptomonas reflexa
Cyolotella meneghiniana
Cyolotella miahiganiana ?
Cyolotella stelligera
Cymatopleura solea
Cymbella affinis
Dactylococcopsis aoieularis
Dactylococcopsis irregularis
Diatoma vulgare
Dictyosphaerium pulchellwn
Dinobvyon divergens
Dinobvyon sevtularia
Dinobryon sooiale
Diploneis smithii
v. pumila
Diplopsalis aauta
Elakatothrix gelatinosa
Entomoneis alata
Euastrum sp.
Eudorina sp.
Euglena aaus
Euglena ehrenbergii
Euglena graoilis
Euglena oxyuris
Euglena oxyuris
v. minor
Euglena tripteris
Fragilaria ovotonensis
Fragilaria intermedia
Glenodinium edax
Glenodinium ooulatum
Gloeoeystis sp.
Golenkinia sp.
Gomphonema graoile
Gomphonema olivaeeum
Gymnodinium albulum
Gymnodinium ordinatwn
Gyrosigma sp.
Hantzschia amphioxys
Kirchneriella contorta
Lagerheimia sp.
Lepooinolis sp.
Lyngbya sp.
Mallomonas sp.
Melosira distans
Melosira granulata
MeTosiva granulata
v. angustissima
Melosira granulata
v. angustissima f. spiralis
Melosira. italioa
Melosira italiea
v. tenuissima
Melosira varians
Merismopedia minima
Merismopedia punotata
Merismopedia tenuissima
Mesostigma viridis
13
-------
Micractinium pusillum
Microcystis aeruginosa
Microcystis incerta
Navicula cryptocephala ?
Navicula cuspidata
Navicula heufieri
Navicula salinarium
v. intermedia
Nephrocytium sp.
Nitzschia acicularis
Nitzschia apiculata ?
Nitzsahia dissipata
Nitzschia holsatica
Nitzschia hungarica
Nitzschia longissima
v. reversa
Nitzschia sigmoidea
Nitzschia tryblionella
Nitzschia tryblionella
v. debi Us ?
Nitzschia vermicularis
Oocystis sp.
Oscillatoria agardhii
Oscillatoria limnetica
Pandorina rnorwn
Pediastrim boryanum
Pediastrwn duplex
v. clathratwn
Pediastrum duplex
v. reticulation
Pediastrum simplex
v. duodenarium
Pediastrum tetras
Pediastrum tetras
v. tetraodon
Peridinium quadridens
Phacus acuminatus
Phacus caudatus
Phacus helikoides
Phacus longicauda
Phacus megalopsis
Phacus orbiculavis
Phacus pseudonordstedtii
Phormidium sp.
Pinnularia sp.
Pteromonas angulosa
Scenedesmus abundans
Scenedesrms acuminatus
Scenedesmus arcuatus
Scenedesmus balatonicus
Scenedesmus bijuga
Scenedesmus denticulatus
Scenedesmus dimorphus
Scenedesmus intermedius
Scenedesmus intermedius
v. bicaudatus
Scenedesmus opoliensis
Scenedesmus quadricauda
Scenedesmus quadricauda
v. longispina
SchToederia setigera
Skeletonema potamos
Sphaerocystis schroeteri
Staurastrum tetracerum
Stephanodiscus astvaea
v. minutula
Stephanodiscus hantsschia
Stephanodiscus invistatus
Stephanodiscus tenuis
Surirella angusta
Surirella linearis
v. helvetica ?
Surirella ovata
Synedra acus
Synedra minuscula
Synedva rumperts
Synedra ulna
Tetraedron minium
Tetraedron minium
v. scrobiculatum
Tetraedron muticum
Tetrastrum elegans
Tetvastrum glabrum
Tetrastiim staurogeniaeforme
Trache lomonas austz'a lica
Trachelomonas bulla
Trachelomonas fluviatilis
Trachelomonas gibberosa
Trachelomonas girardiana
Trachelomonas hispida
Trachelomonas intermedia
Trachelomonas oblonga
Trachelomonas acabra
Trachelomonas sahauinslandii
Trachelomonas verrucosa
Traahelomonas volvocina
14
-------
APPENDIX B. SUMMARY OF PHYTOPLANKTON DATA
This appendix was generated by computer. Because it was only possible to
use upper case letters in the printout, all scientific names are printed in
upper case and are not italicized.
The alphabetic phytoplankton lists include taxa without species names
(e.g., EUNOTIA, EUNOTIA #1, FLAGELLATE, FLAGELLATES, MICROCYSTIS INCERTA ?,
CHLOROPHYTAN COCCOID CELLED COLONY). When species determinations were not
possible, symbols or descriptive phrases were used to separate taxa for
enumeration purposes. Each name on a list, however, represents a unique
species different from any other name on the same list, unless otherwise
noted, for counting purposes.
Numbers were used to separate unidentified species of the same genus. A
generic name listed alone is also a unique species. A question mark (?) is
placed immediately after the portion of a name which was assigned with
uncertainty. Numbered, questioned, or otherwise designated taxa were
established on a lake-by-lake basis; therefore NAVICULA #2 from lake A cannot
be compared to NAVICULA #2 from lake B. Pluralized categories (e.g.,
FLAGELLATES, CENTRIC DIATOMS, SPP.) were used for counting purposes when taxa
could not be properly differentiated on the counting chamber.
ERRATA
Minimum and evenness are misspelled in the computer printout of the
species diversity and abundance indices data,
15
-------
lAKt KAMI I CEDAR BLUFF JUS.
STCRFT NUftBERl ?001
HYXLJPHYCE AN
CHlljfcOPHYCl AN
EUGIENOPHYIE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
NYtAAkD TROPHIC 5TAU INDICES
04 I', 7 2b 7* 10 Cl -f.
0/03 Q
2 .00 I
0/06 ?
0.
-------
IAKI HANI I ClUX UlUII RIS.
SIIIRll NUMBER I 2001
CUNIINUIU
0*.
}(,
06 26
10 01 7t
IA«A
lAKIIftlA
CAK ILKIA KllKSII
CCKAIIUH IIIRUNUINI lit
CHRIIUMUNA^ AlUIA
ClIISII Kiun
coi i ASIRUM Micurinimn
CHI I AS I kirn MI HCUiAlUN
CRUCItllllA GUADKAIA
CRVPIIIMIINAS
CRIP IIIMIIHAS IKUSA
CHTPIUHUNAS KARSSUNII
CRVPiunuHAS MUIIA
CTCLUllllA MINCCHINUNA
CTCtlllUlA nlCHIbAHIAHA I
CtnetiiA
CYSI
IIAC inuiuctiipsis
UlNUBKYUM DIVIKklNS
IIAKAIOIHKII CtlAIINUSA
IUL1INA
[UCIIMA IIIRlHIJtPGI I 7
FlALUlAU
IRAGILAVIA (BIIIIINI MS1S
Iff) IIS 1C. HA
nilllSIKA OISIANS
Ml I US Id* I IAIUA
MIR 15MUCIUIA MINIMA
nixisnupkUiA PUHCIAIA
HUftllCfSIIS AIKUCINU3*
NAVICU1A
NIUSCIIIA r|
NIIIStHIA 12
not » $ 1 1 j
niClllAlURIA
USCI1IAIURIA lIHhlllCA
PIOIASIKUN BURfANUH
PdJIASIKUn UUfKI
V. CIAIHKAIUH
PtNNAIi OlAllin
PIRIOINIUN UUAUHUIHS
PIIACUS HII.A1UPSIS
SClHllll SMUS AHUNUAHS
SCINIOISHUS (AlAlllMlCUS
OUAflRICAUOA
«UAIIRICAUOA
V. IONCISPIN*
SPHAKOCtSIlS iChKCHfH
SlAUDASIKUH lilRACtKUM
Sll PIIINUUI SlUS
S1IPHANUDISCUS ASIRAIA
». nlNUIUlA
STNEUK*
iTHlUBA AC US
SIHIDKA HINUiCUlA
I11RAEOKUM tlllllnun
V. SCRljBICUl AIUH
IHACHIIUMIHAS INIIkHCUIA
ritACIIItUtlONAS IIVlUNb*
IUIAI
dim
Cll
Cll
Ctl
cii
Cll
cm
COl
Cit
COl
en
Cll
Cll
CCI
fii
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
cm
cm
mi
Cll
Cll
rn
Ctl
1 a
i u
CUl
cm
Cll
CCI
Cll
cm
CUl
COl
cm
CUl
COl
Cll
Cfl
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
AlCAl
UNUS
S 1C PIR HI
7.?
M.2
1.1
1.2
6t.2
1
«
>
1
34
X
<>V
«
I
1
«
1
«
I
1
I
J»
I
J>
X
>
312
At CAl
UN IIS
s tc PIR ni
1 1
3.6
3.6
X
I
3B
1
I
19
1
I
I
K
X
I
X
X
1
»
1
X
19
X
X
AlCAl
UNIIS
s 1C en ni
1 49.2
l.t
t i.e
* 15.9
1.5
I 4.B
1.5
l.S
».•
t.*>
1.5
5.6
X
10*1
111
I
123
X
337
1
I
X
31
1
123
I
31
X
31
123
X
X
I
61
31
1
123
I
432
2116
17
-------
LAKE MAHU COUHCU GROVE
STORET NUMBERS 2002
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 04 11 74 Ob 25 74 10 02 74
MtXCPHVCEAN
CHLOROPHYCEAN
EU&LENOPHVTE
DIATOM
COHPOUND
0/01 0
5.00 E
0.60 E
0.50 E
13.0 E
0/02 0
1.00 E
2.50 E
04/0 E
5.50 E
0.25 T
0.75 E
1.50 E
0.83 E
3.75 E
PALMER'S OK6AN1C POLLUTION INDICES
DATE 04 11 74 06 25 74 10 02 74
6ENUS
SPECIES
09
01
00
08
03
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 04 11 74 06 25 74 10 02 74
AVERAGE DIVERSITY
NUMBER OF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES COMPOSITED
MAXIMUM DIVERSITY MAXH
MNUMUH DIVERSITY M1NH
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TOTAL NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/ML
EVENESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVENESS
MEAN NUMBER Of INDIVIDUALS/TAXA
NUMBER /Ml Of MOST ABUNDANT TAX'ON
H
S
H
XM
NH
0
N
J
RJ
L
K
2.72
26.00
3.00
4.81
0.09
10852.80
3990.00
0.57
C.56
142.50
1020.00
1.76
17.00
3.00
4.09
0.20
1545.26
878.00
0.43
0.41
51.65.
527.00
1.67
30.00
3.00
4*91
O.W
4701.05
2815.00
0.34
0.33
93.83
1583.00
18
-------
I MI MM I COUMIl t*UM
Slum mmoiRi 2002
I*IA
AKRISIRUOtSKUS f*ie*IUS
MuiisraausMS UICAIUS
V. M ICW MIS
CWI IHUf 0
MUM
06
T»
10 02 74
«. MIRABIUS
APHANIIUNEMOI aos-AouAf
*sitRiu«EiiA i MHOS*
CIRATIUH MimmoiMiiA
CERATUM HIMMDIMU*
I. BMCMTCIBAS
CMROOMMAS ACUIA
CNRTsopNf f*n em «i
CIPSIIBIIM •!
Cl OS II RIO* *2
ciosttaiw 01
CtUSIiBIUH M
COE1ASIRWI NICBftr-WMI
COSHMIIM ClUMtlMI
CRfPtamNAS IBOSA
CRTPIONONAS RtlltlA
CIC1OUI1A
CKlOIIll* MMSNIHIMA
CVMMIt*
OUIMU MIlCABi
DI»IOPS*1II MUI*
It*k*IOIHBU M1AIIBUS*
[O6LIM*
IIKIIIM »l
IUC1IM ft
ItKlfM •»
flMtfM IHBIHBIB6II
IWLEM OITMIS
*. *|IUM
fMliMk I«I»IIBII
IBAtllABI*
6tlMOOI«IUH 10*1
ctiHOOiNiua ocm.*i«M
UMPMMI.II*
CIIIOSIMIA
NAH1IKIII* «NVHIO«VS
HI I US U*
MHOS IRA OISIANS
MilOSIB* fcBAMttlAI*
MiDSIB* CR«Mll*l*
«. *M«VSIItSIII*
MIOS1B* » ARUMS
NAVICVIA
MIIISCHIA
MIIISCHIA nvmtuiARis
ftOUSIRWI It IRAS
V. IIIRAOMM
MACUS MfllNOIIttS
PHACUS HE6A10PSIS
PIMHUIARIA
StEMIDESHUS OUAORICAUOA
SKtUIOMtHA POIABOS
SIEPHAHOOISCUS *SI«A(A
*. HINUIUtA
SURIRiltA
STMIBRA At OS
STHIORA M.HA
IEIRASIRIM SIAUROCENIAirORHE
IRACHI1IMOMS
IRACHtlUMIMAS SCHAUlMSIAHOI I
IOIM.
loan
Fii
Ml
CEI
Ell
CIl
CIl
Cfl
Cfl
Cfl
CIl
CIl
CIl
Cfl
cm
CIl
CIl
CIl
CIl
ffl
ffl
Cfl
Cfl
Cfl
CIl
Cfl
HI
Cfl
CCI
CIl
CIl
Cfl
CIl
CIl
CIl
CEI
CEI
CIl
CIl
CIl
CEI
CEI
CEI
CIl
CIl
CIl
eoi
CEI
CEI
CIl
CM.
COl
CIl
CIl
CEI
CEI
CM
CEI
CIl
A1CA1
units
1C Pi I Bl
"oTei 10
i
1.61 1*0
24.61 990
1
0.61 10
2».6
6.6
C.I
l.»
0.0
0.1
22.6
2.1
1020
1
1
2 TO
1
90
1
60
I
I
10
I
I
I
110
I
1
1
g
900
I
X
1
90
At 6*1
UN1IS
sc PIR m
60.0
9.0
4.0
20.0
4.0
6.0
I
MT
IS*
1
19
1
I
I
1T6
I
I
•
I
1»
TO
II
I
A16A1
UNI IS
»c PIB m
Z.I
2T.I
2.1
,
16.1
2.1
,
10.4
, V>
I
T62
*
I
1
1
»9
1161
I
I
I
I
M
I
I
•
I
I
I
I
1
1
1
I
I
1
I
291
1*90
6TB
201>
19
-------
LAKE NA.1t; : ELK C I I T
SI PUT MDfllHR:
UAH
MYXOCHYClAN
CHLriH/PHYCl AN
[UGH NCPtiY II
i) I A T U"
CUMPfiUND
IKUPHH S I A 7 I. INUUS
10 7S 06 <"• Vi 1', 1.1 /«i
C3/0 f,
G
-------
I AM HANI I ILK till
SIUM1 HUMBltl 2003
CONtIHUID
ANAbAINA
CINIRIC in Aiuns
cut AI IUH HIKUNDINIUA
t. FuktuiuiS
CHI AIHIMIMUNAS GLUBUSA
ClUUKCIPIItl AN Clll
CIIRDOnUNAS
CHK(JUHUNAS AlUIA
CLUSIIKIUN
CllllASIkUH CAflBltlCUn
V. INIIKMIOIlin
COIIA5KUK HKRUPtHUII
CRUCIGINIA HIKAPIDIA
CRtPllimiNAS
CUtPK.miNAS IIIUSA
CMPKimmAS RIIU»A
citPlunuMA s iPP.
CYCIUII 1 1 A
riClUMUA niNCGIIINIANl
CUIOIIUA SMILICIKA
cinmuA
OAC miKuccuPsis
OINUUKtllN DIVCK6INS
IUC 1 1 HA
IUGLINA II
lUGlfNA li
fUGLLhA UITURM
[UblltlA SPP.
lUCHNA K1PIOIS
FRAGIIAKIA INURHIDU
Gill [NKIHIA
bUMPKUNtHA ChACllI
GTHNUblHIUn DKUIMAIUH
HANIISCHIA AMPHIUJI5
IIPIIC INCH S
nil US IK A DISIANS
nil US ID A GRANUIAIA
NilUSIKA GHIHUIAIA
V. AIICUSI MSIHA
msosiicru vimuis T
HICRUOSIIS
HAVICIHA
HAVICUIA II
NAVICUIA I?
NAVICUIA I)
Hi I2SCHIA
HIUUIIIA II
HI I ISCIIIA ACICUIARIS
HII1SIMIA MUHIiAHICA
NIUSCHIA IKKBl HlHdlA
V. Dldlll S >
DSCIIIAlURlA
PIIACU-I ACUHINAIUi
PHACU5 MfCAlUPSIS
PMURNIUIUN
PIIKUMIJHAi ANGUinSA
SCINlUtSnUS HICAUUAIUS
SCINCUtSHUS niHIICUlAIUS
sciMtinsnus uinuopiius
sei NCDI smij auAim ICAUO*
5CIIHUIUIHI A SI IIGIIA
SKI It IUHIKA PUIAMUS
Slf PHANU3ISCUS
SUK IKIllA U»AIA
IIUAJIKUH
IRACHIIIinUHAJ AUSIKAIICA
IDACHIIUM1NAS INllRhllllA
IHAtHlllinllNAi JCAB««
KACFIIIIIMUNAS SPP.
IUIAI
luuri
ill
HI
cri
til
Cll
Cll
Cll
tit
Cll
in
cut
CUL
Ctl
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
CCl
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cfl
CCl
Cll
Ctl
Cll.
Cll
Cll
Cll
Clt
Cll
Cll
cri
CIL
Cll
Cll
cm
in
Cll
CIL
cu
CIL
CIL
Cll
Cll
CIL
Ml
CU
CIL
III
Cll
COL
Cll
COl
COl
CIL
Cll
Cll
Cll
cm
COl
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
AltAl
UNI IS
S XC PEK HI
1
2
*
i
3
2i.2
4.3
17.4
13.0
2.9
.
t.T
4.1
17.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.4
?.»
t64
174
X
4911
X
X
373
1
X
X
X
B3
I
X
I'll
X
J24
X
49«
X
4)
41
X
X
41
X
41
I
X
• 1
X
Al GAl
UN IIS
S U PIS HI
2
•>
4
I
1
1
U.H m
i
i
i
i
i
10.11 229
1
1
1 X
1
1. 01 23
|
6.11 m
I
I
1 x
1
1
1
1 1
1 I
1
1 I
1 I
1
».ll 114
1 I
1
1 X
1
1
1.01 23
| |
2.01 46
1
1 X
1
7.11 161
1
2.01 46
1 >
1
|
1
1.01 23
1 X
1 X
|
1
1
|
1 X
1 X
19.21 436
12.11 279
1
2.01 46
1
1 I
2.01 46
6.11 136
1
1
1
2.01 46
1 I
1 I
1 X
131 4.11 206
AltAl
UNI IS
s xc PI> ni
i i >
1120.11 70
»
4
3
I
33.2
13.4
13.4
6.7
6.7
6.7
I
I
129
42
I
»2
26
26
I
I
X
X
26
X
2160
2272
389
21
-------
lAKt NAME: FALL RIVER KES.
S Kjftl f
AU
tUOUHOPHYTf
0
NY 1. A AC (I 7fcLPHlC SFAIt 1NDICIS
.«i 1C V«, /«t 70
HAXJHUH OltfffilTT HAXH '..3'y !> !>268.91 1366.^0
101AL NU^.fcEK Of Ihtl ViOUALS/r.L N bQ^.^-O 2<)11.CO BbO.JO
IVfNISS CHrtPOHENT J O.Ob 0.3fa C.«i«i
RfLAIlVf EVIMSS P.J 0.6<. 0.37 0.2 107. tl t> 1. 7c.
IAXON K 2J1.0U 12ii2.CO 'jbO.JO
22
-------
i AIU turn i (AH mvm
SIOMI HUMIIIl 2uO*
1A«A
ANAtAtNA
APHAHIICtnlNUH fllH-AOUAl
ASIIKIOMUIA lOIIHllSA
CINIRIC uition
Clk A HUH MIlUMHINlllA
I. BKACHVCEKAl
CIIAllUn HIIUNDINtllA
I. fUOCCIIOlS
CMftUOftONAS ACUIA
UOSIIRIUH tl
ClOSIItlUM •!
cnccuHiis
CK»» lUKUHAS 1KIISA
CMMOIIOHAS r>A*ssuNii
C*TMIMII)NAS Mill »A
OACITlUCIltCWSIJ
DINOIIIIUN SltlUtAKIA
uiriursAiii ACUIA
lUOlEIIA
IU6IINA ACUS
IU6IEMA IHklNBIRtll t
lUCttNA KACIl IS
CUNIIHUIO
C» 10 I*
Oh
T*
10 02 7*
ncuiAiun
ODUJUIIA
MI I 01 It A
nilUSIKA DISUHS
HIIOSIM CRANUIA)A
Ml 1 01 1* A IIAHUIAIA
V. AHfcUSI 1I1IHA
HIUSCIIIA
NlflSCHIA II
MII1SCHIA VIIMUUI AIM
no i AS i HIM Dvnii
«. ClAlHUAIUH
ri»USIkUN IllRAS
fMACUS ACUMNAIUS
fMACUS lUNCUAMIA I
iCHROIUlll* iCIUIHA
JMtttONin* fOIAMUS
SUfHANUDMCUS
SIEfKANUUISCUS ASKAIA
«. NINUIUIA
lUIIIIUlA
iTNEO«A
ITNEODA ACUS
S1NIO«A UIHA
l«ACHIIOM)MAi
IIACHIIOHOHAI INItlNIUIA
IUIAI
IU»B
fit
III
trt
Cll
Cil
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
tn
Ctl
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
COl
COl
Cfl
Cll
ca
Cll
Cll
Cll
Ctl
Ctl
Cll
Ctl
Cll
CCl
Cll
AltAl
UNI IS
s xc rt« ni
i
»
j
«
t
71.6
17. T
11. T
II. T
J.»
».»
11.7
11.7
Zll
!»•
X
I
I0»
109
I
»1
»J
X
109
I
1
1
4
1
10»
1
1
1
1
AltAl
UNIIJ
s »c rt» HI
1
1
J
t
•>
l.ll 12
27.2
*1.)
I.I
27.2
2.2
I
I
1
791
1
I
I
I7O2
1
I
I
I
I
1
I
12
«
1
1
1
1
1
I
791
tl
I
AltAl
UNI IS
S U HI Ml
1
*
2
I
»
62. J
S.O
14.0
IO.O
2.4
l.t
2.4
I
<
1
550
*»
I
I
I
11?
• •
1
22
It
X
X
22
1
• 9>
2911
110
23
-------
lAKt NAME< JUHN REDMOND RES.
STOkET NUMBERS 2005
NYGAARU TROPHIC SlATt INDKIS
OA1E 0* 11 /* 06 2b 7<. 10 01 T>
KYXOPHYCEAN 02/0 t Cl/0 E 1.CO E
CrtlOKOPHYCtAN 03/0 t. 05/0 fc b.CO E
tUGlENOPHYU O.*0 t 1.J3 t 0.86 t
DIA10H 1.2S E 3.00 E 2.00 E
COMPOUND 12/0 I 20/0 t 17.0 E
PAIMER'S ORGANIC PDLLUI10>« INDICES
DATE , 04 11 Ti Ob 2i 7^ 10 01 Ti
GENUS
SPECIES
11
12
01
00
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE C* 11 Tt 06 25 Ti 10 01 T>
AVERAGE UIVEKS1TY
NUMbER UF TAXA
OF SAMPLES CUNPOS1UD
MAXIHUM DIVERSITY
H1NUMUH OIVtRSITY MINH
TOIAl DIVERSITY
TOTAL NonttEK UF 1NDIV10UAIS/MI
EVENESS COMPONENT
REIATIVE EVENESS
MEAN NUHBtk Uf 1ND1V10UAIS/TAkA
MUHBEK/Ml DF MUST ABUNDANT TAXUN
H
S
: M
NH
D
N
J
RJ
I
K
2.7i
20.00
2.00
"i.32
0.27
9191.91
3367.00
0.63
0.63
U6.35
1143. CO
3.21
2&.OC
2. GO
-------
IMf MAllll 4bHN MBIHMD RIS.
SIORfl NUHBtRl 20b»
CIMIIMVtO
M II 74
06 2» 7*
10 01 7*
1AXA
ACIIIMSIRUN
AMKISIROUE SHUJ MUA1US
*. ACUUIARIS
APHANUOHINOM flOS-AOUAt
CEHIRIC 01*1011
CHARM ItW 12
CHARACIUN IIHHIIICUN I
CHPUOMIttAS ACUIA
ClOSIIRIOrSIS
ClOtltRIUH
COtlASIRUH HICROPURUH
CRUCItfNIA 1I1RAM01A
CRVMOHOKAS mas*
CUIOUILA
CVHBULA
DAcmocaccupsis
EUClfNA If
lUCLfMA ACUS
IUGUNA MACIIIS
EUCtlNA 01 VIM IS
*. RINUR 7
IU6UNA IRIF1IRIS
FlAtlllAlE 17
fiAdiiAif n
MOEOCTSIIS
COHfHONtHA
RUCHNIRIEL1A
UNtBVA
MIOSIRA OISIAHS
IIItOSIRA «RANWtAU
MIOSIRA tRAMIlAI*
«. AMUSIIISIIIA
MIOSIRA IIAIICA
MAVICUiA
MIIISCMU II
MI1ISCHIA fZ
NITISCHIA II
NIT2SCNIA f«
NII1SCHIA SPP.
OOCTSIM
OSCIIIAIURIA
PIOIASIRIM oumi
». CIAIHDAIUII
PIHMAlt OIAIOHS
PHACUS AtUHINAIUS
PHACUS CAUOA1US
PHACUS HftAlOPSIS
PHACUS PSIUOUMOROSIIOIII
PttROMJNAS
SCiNiO(SNUS B I JUG A
SCINIOtSKUS UIMORPHUS
SCHROIOIRIA iillCCRA
SKClllDMiHA PU1AMIS
S1IPHAMOOISCUS
StIPHAMMIISCUS AS1RAIA
V. HIMUIUIA
IRACHUOHOHAS AUSIRAIICA 7
IRACHllOnOHAS BU1IA
IRACHltOMINAS 61BBIRUSA
IRACHILODONAS CIRARUIANA
1RACHUONONAS IMURM.OIA
IOIAI
fORN
CIl
Cfl
til
cri
Ml
CIl
CIl
CIl
CIl
C01
C01
Ctl
Ctl
Ml
CIl
CIl
Ml
Ml
CIl
Ml
CIl
CIl
Ml
Ml
Ml
ru
Ml
Ml
Ml
CIl
Ml
Ml
Ml
CIl
Ml
Ml
Cfl
III
C01
Ml
Ml
Ml
CIl
Ml
Ml
COI
COI
CE1
Ctl
CE1
Ml
CEl
Ml
Cfl
CIl
Ml
A16A1
UNI IS
S U PIR HI
"
»
2
1
»
1
r.zi ?4i
i
J.6I 120
1
2».OI 842
12.»
1.6
S.fc
1.0
1.0
».J
1.0
31.9
421
120
120
1
bO
1
I
60
I
IRO
I
I
I
60
X
1141
1
AICA1
UN IIS
S U MR Al
~
*
2
1
1
4
1.6
T.I
T.I
14.1
1.6
20.6
T.I
3.6
1.6
T.I
10. T
3.6
X
I
I
42
04
1
I
R4
.
169
I
I
42
117
I
•
1
• 4
1
42
.
42
• 4
126
1
42
1
1
AIGA1
UNITS
s -*c m HI
"
»
3
2
4
1
21.0
14.2
23.0
9.6
20.6
__ _.-
1
I
139
1
1
I
03
1
X
1
I
119
I
1
1
I
1
S6
1
X
X
X
16T
X
3367
117*
$04
25
-------
LAKE NAflt! KAKUPUlIb KFL*UNO
Gl/C £
0^/0 I
C.J3 t
l.*5 t
owe t
0//0 t
J 1/0 t
C.bZ L
O.bO t
2WO t
l.CO
i>.CG
C. 33
1 . CO
u.o
DAK
GtNUS
SPECKS
C
-------
l*KE M*IU I KAHUPlll IS HIS.
JIOMI NUMftEKl 2001.
1*1*
CPNIIMUID
7*
06 27 7*
10 01 7*
ANIII5I ItUnf SmiS MICAIUS
ANKisiitUDlsnus FAICAIUS
v. ACICUIAUIS
tin
CINIKIC DIAHlhS
CHI ANYOlmONAS
CHROOnUNAS *CUU
OIK tSflPMYlAM Clll
ciusiiRiun
(OfiASiKUH CAniRitun
V. INKItllEDlUn
CRTPIUNUNAS (ROSA
CRIPIOHUNAS nARSSONii
CRTPlcmuNAS KEtiu*
cmomi*
CrClUllllA niNtGHINIANA
UAC mucuccupsis
oicmispHAERiuii puiCHE-iiun
PIPIUPSAUS *CUI*
ENIONONUS
EUCIEMA
tUGIENA »CU5
IUGIEN* CRtClllJ
IllGEllAlt
C1CNUOIHIUH I0*«
fcKNQDINIUH OCUIAIUB
COUNKIHIA
Mil US I II A DISlAHi
NKISnUPfOI* UHblSSIDA
HAKICUIA
NITiSCIII* II
HIUSIHIA II
M1IISCMU ACICUIAIIS
NIIISCHU lUMCISSIN*
V. «l»t«S»
PCOUJ1KUM DUPltl
». ClAlHRAIUH
piNHAit oiAinn
PHAIUS ACUHIHA1US
PIIACU5 Hit. IKOIPIS
PHACUS NltAtUPSl^
SCtNllHSMUS BlJUkA
iCCNiDISNUS niHIICUIAIUS
SCINlDfSnuS HIHDRfHU^
ICiNEDISnUS UPOIIINSIS
ICINEUiinUS OUAORICAUD*
SCIIKJlOHilA SHIblk*
SKI If lUlllnA POIAMIIS
SIIPIIAMIIOISCUS
Sll PHAKIIOI SCUS ASIUAIA
V. NINUIUIA
JlhlOKA ACUS
lf1R*IO>tON MUIICUH
IIIKASIDUn SIAUKUGtNlAil ORKE
1RACMIIUHUNAS IIUVIAIIUS
UACHI tUHQHA! HMPIUA
UACIIClUnDMAi INIIRHIDI*
IDUSPOflE
1111*1
FUKK
(01
(Cl
(EE
(El
(El
(El
CEl
Cll
CEl
cm
((I
(11
cri
(11
(tl
(Cl
COl
Cll
Cll
(EL
Cll
CEl
.CEl
CEl
Cll
m
Cll
(01
(El
(El
CEl
Cll
CEl
Ell
cat
(El
(El
CEl
cri
cm
CUl
CUl
COl
CUl
CEl
CEl
CEl
CEl
(11
(El
(El
(Ol
(01
(El
Cll
CEl
CEl
AlOAl
UNI IS
5 1C UN HI
1
s
2
3
*
22.1
e.*
7.
I
44
44
44
44
264
1234
44
1771
6604
4162
27
-------
LAKE N&rtt: MARION (US.
STL'ftf T NUM9ER : 2'J'J I
NYGAAKD TROPHIC 5 I /. 11 INUJClS
L A 1E f, <• 1 't I
-------
IAKI M*nll nARIOH RES. CIWMHUID
2007
1*1*
KIINASIKUK
AHABAfHA
ANMSIROUI jnus f*u»itii
V. »(ICUl««IS
ArilANIiOHEMON Hlll-AUU*!
CAKUflA
CtHAllUN HIRIlNnlNlllA
I. BkAUHClKAl
CIU APITDUMUNAS
CHlURUI'Hrl AN CUCCU10 Cll LED lUlUNY
CHRUUhUHiAS *CUU
ciusiiKiun
euii*sittun KlCKUPiiKun
CRUCIUIMA QUADRA 1*
CKUCK.IIII* 1IIK»P(UI*
CRtPiunuN*s i sos*
CRTPIimilNAS IKOS*
V. SHIHA
12 7UPll>
V. REIICUL*IUn
PIHNAU IIIAIOn
PH1CUS
ICINEIItSHUS INIltflEUIUS
V. BIC*UO*IUS
SCINEUI illUS OU*URIC*UD*
SCHILHUEKI* HllbKt
SKEIEIOIKN* PUI*NOS
SIEHONUUISCUS ASIKAtA
V. NlNUIUl*
SUN IMII I* IV
SYNIUKA ACU5
S>NIUK* UlN*
it IRAIUHUN nui icun
II IRASIRUH E1ICANS
ItlRASIHlin SIAUHUCLNIAEIUHKE
m»CHllUnl)N»S INIIRHEUU
IbML
fORfl
Cll
III
Clt
rn
CEl
CEl
Cfl
COl
Cll
Cll
COl
CUl
COl
cei
cu
Cll
CEl
CEl
COl
CEl
C(l
Cll
CEl
Cll
Cll
Cll
CEl
Cll
CEl
Cll
Cll
COl
COl
en
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
CEl
Ctl
III
COl
Cll
CEl
CUl
cm
CEl
CEl
Cll
CEl
Cll
Cll
Cll
cm
COl
CEl
AlSAl
UNI IS
S XC Pl« Ml
5
1
I
)
4
0.?
O.I
0.4
0.1
71. «
1».0
J.7
0.1
1.4
0.5
• 5
1
I
I
42
169
X
42
io7ia
11
1
tm
l»
1
*
X
X
42
1310
X
ill
X
*ICAL
UN MS
s tc riR m.
i
2
J
4
1
14.6
2.1
12. •>
2.1
16.7
10.4
2.1
a. 3
2.1
27.0
2.1
II
X
166
24
I
142
I
I
24
«
I
190
I
IK
24
94
X
I
I
X
24
JOB
24
»l(*l
UNITS
S XC PER HI
1
S
4
2
3
1 I
1
1
1 X
?.n «e
Ik. til 660
1
9.41 196
1
14.61 616
1 I
1 X
1 I
1
7.11 301
3.11 132
1
1
9.41 396
1.01 44
1 I
1 I
1 I
1
1
1
1.01 44
1 X
1.01 44
1 I
1.0| 44
1
1
1 X
1.01 44
1 >
|
1 X
1
1
13. »l »72
|
4.21 176
1
1 I
|
1
1
1 «
1.01 44
1.01 44
1.01 44
1
11. M 414
|
1
1
1 *
1
1.01 44
1 I
1191%
1119
4224
29
-------
LAKE NAfU :
PflVfRh KtS.
a 7^. 10 01 7 ?<• 10 01 ?<.
NUMBER at SAMPLES
IUTAI NUMitK
MEAN NUMfiER
NUMBER/ML \jf
UF TAXA
COMPOSIIEE*
DIVERSITY
tCJTAt DIVERSITY
INDIVIUUAIS/MI
EWENESS CUMPONEN1
KtLAIlVE EVENESS
OF I NU I V IDUAL5 / T A X A
HJit ABUNDANT TAXDN
H
s
M
PAXH
H1NH
0
N
J
RJ
I
K
1 . 2t
*
-------
OKI NAIH I lUtVlKH US.
note i MMiiiRi toot
tOHlIHUID
04 12 74
06 2»
10 01 74
IAXA
ANAbAfMt
1
S»
I
I
»»
I
1
1
1199
1
4t
192
I
1
1
I
1
2*«7
31
-------
LAKE KAME : niltOKli KES.
STGRcl
1 YXL'PHYCl" «N
CrtltJklPHYCt AN
EIH,U Nl'PMY It
CUMf-UUNU
MYGAAkO TKtiPHIC SlAH I
i*r 11 /<. 06 i-6 /<. 10
<".
C'l/0 I
03/L t
C.^i t
C . 1 V JUUM S/M.
,1E AN MUhbLP
NUMBEK/ML UE
RUAllVt tVENtiS
Uf 1UD1 W10UALS / IAJIA
lUil AbtlitbANf TAXON
DATE
H
5
M
HAXH
hlNH
I)
N
J
RJ
L
K
C.<. II ?<• 06 Hb Ti 10 03
C.
37Dfl(..
.01
i 00
.3c
1070. *
3.13
27. 00
4.UO
0.66
i J. 81
1.7C
'..UO
c-.a
-------
KM runf i NIIMIRM US.
stu«Ei
IAIA
ACI INAS mim cmcniMi'i
ANABAIHA II
ANABAINUI>SIS
ANKISIXUIUSPIUS fAHAIUi
*. ACICULAKIS
CIIM1 INUiO
CJ* 1 1 7".
10 Oi 7*
A5II8MJNULA fllRrluSA
CEHIRIC II1AIIIHS
CHI OHtiPIIIIAN (UtOHT
CMRUUUINAS ACUti
cnccDiu cm
coiiAStKun niCRoroRun
CBUCIttHIA UlKAPtOIA
CRtMONOAAS
cmpHmuNAS MOSA
CVCLU1IUA
C»«AlflPIIU»« SULK
DACmiitiiccurm IRKIGUIARIS
(Ut I IN*
lUGHNA AC US
fUGllNA OH At 1 1 IS
(UGUKA IRIMIRIS
UAttlLAll
CYRUSIGMA
IIPOC INCUS
ITM(,BYA
MLUSIKA DISItHS
MIIOSIKA OAMULAU
«. ANCUS1 ISSIH1 .
HI10SU* t HANOI A, U
V. AHCUSMSSInt I
Nil Oil** 1 UlIC*
NIII.1M1SIIS *I*UCINU}*
HICIOCfSTIS INCKIA
NAVICUIA II
MAVICUIA •^
HI1ZSCIIIA II
NIUUIIIA 12
NIIMCIIIA 1}
NIIZSCIIIA JIGNOIDEt
NIIJSCMI* IRTIllUNillA
QOCISIIS
OSC I LI A Km I A II
03 1 UlAlllklA tt
UUPLfl
SP IK AIIS
riousmun
V. IIIRAUnOM
rfHIDINIUH OUtpKIUfHS
PHACUS ACUHIHAlUS
PHACUS lONCIClUOt
PIIACUS UP.DICUIARIS
PtIACUS rSEUIHJNUKOSIIOIII
SCINIOISHUS BICAUUAIUS
SCI NIHC SMUS OIIIUdPMUS
SUNCDISnUS OUAOKICAUUA
SKI LI IIINIHA PU?»nUS
SIIPMANUDISCUS
Sll PHAIIUUISCUS tSIOAIA
V. MNUIUIA
SUOIRILLA 19
SUtlRltl* UMitKIS
V. HI I VI I 1C* t
STMfW* »CUS
IUI*t
fORH
CM
III
Fll
til
III
Cll
Cil
COl
Cll
Cll
CPl
COl
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
CEI
Cll
Cll
III
Cil
Cll
Cll
C(l
cm
CM
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
m
1 11
COl
COl
Cll
Cll
til
Cll
Cll
COl
cm
COl
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cft
s
•>
3
*
i
1
xc
1.9
7.6
1.0
0.2
0.6
*9.0
19.2
0.2
0.*.
HIOAL
UNI IS
UN Ml
I
ISO
I
HOI
«
?2»
1
>
*i
X
I
I
x
11)
1
«
1
IIJ21
9211
*»
I
90
?3»»0
S
1
*
2
J
*
zc
20.7
«.«
10.3
6.9
10.1
17.2
10.1
!.<•
10.3
l.»
AlCAl
UHIIS
PI* Nt
I
I
I
2I«
94
1«Z
1
94
I
1*2
1
«
I
I
236
I
1*2
I
a
47
1
I
I
1*2
*7 .
1
II
1372
S
2
•>
*
3
1
1C
10. «
1.3
3.9
0.6
1.3
0.6
1.9
9.7
61.2
1.4
ALOAl
UMIIS
PER HI
X
790
I
t
99
296
I
*9
1
1
k
•)»
i
X
X
X
X
I
X
*9
!*•
740
il»2
Ml
• 7600
33
-------
LAKE NArtl ' MCRION Rt S.
SHiRCT NUMHtK: 20 1C'
HTXUPHYlt AH
CHl UMJPIIYU AN
fct)l,lCNCJPHY U
UJAJUM
UtMPUUNU
NYGAAKU JRCJfHlC SUIE
0*. 1'j /<• 06 28 7i
3.76
33. 00
2.00
&. J
.JO
0. TJ
0. 75
34
-------
I AM Mint I HUH IUN IIS.
Sioifi Nunimt 20ic
U«A
ANAtAtNA
ANKIS1IIUIU SNUS
ANKISUUOiSHUS UICAIIIS
v. AticuiAms
ASlmlUNEUA IO*nuSA
CHARACIUH 12
CHA«ACIUH NAtbElll I
CHIAHYDOHUNAS
CHRUOHUHAS ACUIA
CUClA^IKim CANimiCUH
«. INIEMHEOIUH
CHUCICtHIA
CHUCICtHIA flHIilRAIA
CHUCICIHIA IIIDACtUIA
cimi INUIO
Ob It
0* 10 >*
CIIPIUHOHAS IKDSA
OtPIONUNAS HAKSSUNII
CRTPtlinUNAS SPP.
CICIOUltA
OACIIIOCIICCUPSIS
DlcirusPHAimun FuiciiEiiun
OINOFlAblllAll
EIAKAIOIHRU
IPIPHTIi
fUbllNA l\
fUClkNA 12
IUGIEMA I)
IUII IMA AC US
IIACltlAII I?
CltNUDIMlUN IOAI
ClOIOCfSIIS I
bOHPHUM[HA
KIICHNIIII UA
IUNAII CIllS
HAtlOMUNAS
MI I OS U A BISIANS
HIIOSIM CRANUIAIA
HI 1 05 111 A GRANUIAIA
V. ANIUSIISSIIU
ntnunuriou HIMIHA
BIKIShOHDIA 1INUISSIHA
MISO3IIGIU VIDIOIS
nlCRUOSII S
NAVICUtA tl
NAVICUIA H
NAVKUIA IllUfllm
HI pumiCTiiun
NII/StlllA
NIUSCIIU II
NI I JSCHIA
noctsus
PAIlDOIllNA
fllllASIHUn OUPtll
v.
rmcui
PIIACUS
SCINlblSnut
SCEHtliESNUS ACUHIMAIUS
ICiMIDiSHUS IIMCA
SCIHIIIISHUi OIHIICUIAIUS
SCiNltMSHUS DIM*PHUS
SCHDDIOIMA JIIItKA
SIIPHANUHISCUS
I1MIMA
STUIVII* fl
ITNtM* II
IIIRAIPIIIIH
II IRASIIIUII SIAUHObtHUlFIWItt
IDACHIIOHONli
IUIAI
IURN
rn
Cll
Cll
Ctl
cri
Cfl
Cll
CEl
COl
COl
COL
COl
CCI
CCI
Cll
CEl
CEl
CEl
COl
CEl
CEl
CEl
Ctl
CEl
CEl
Cfl
CEl
Ctl
COl
Cfl
Cll
Cfl
Cll
Cll
Ctl
CCI
COl
COl
Cfl
cm
COl
Cll
Cfl
CEl
coi
CCI
Cfl
Ctl
Cil
Cfl
COl
COl
CEl
Cll
COl
COl
CDl
CM
cut
Ctl
Ctl
III
Clt
Cll
Cll
cm
AltAl
UNI II
s tc rt* nt
1
4
1
2
12.0
24. a
4. a
3.1
a. 2
2.4
1.0
4.4
0.7
1.0
0.3
0.1
0.7
0.3
1.1
a.t
1.4
4716
1717
711
4*a
x
1222
156
1
151
662
102
I
l»l
51
51
102
1
1
51
45a
1271
20*
1
1
0.11 SI
Cll 1*1 2.71 607
AI6AI
s u ri* HI
2
»
4
1
1
1 I
1 I
1
1
0.41 104
1 X
1 *
19.91 567S
».5I 1562
1
1
0.21 52
1
1
0.51 156
|
1
1
1 »
1
|
1
1 >
21.91 624a
1
1
1 X
1
1
1
0.41 104
|
1
1
1 1
1
2.JI 7ai
i
19.11 11142
1 I
0.21 52
1
1
0.51 156
1
0.21 S2
1
1
0.21 »2
1
1
0.41 104
1.61 1041
0.51 1S6
1
1 1
1
1
1
1
0.21 S2
1
1 1
2.9i an
0.7| 20a
1
1
1
1
1 I
1
AlCAl
UNI IS
j sc PE« m
4
1
1
»
2
1 1
a. 21 64)
1
1
1
1
1
1.91 149
6.91 »46
1
0.61 50
1
I
a. 21 645
1 I
0.61 50
I
I
5.71 447
6.11 496
1
0.61 50
1
1
i.ei 29a
I
I
I i
2. SI 1*9
i
i
i
2. SI 1*9
1
1
0.61 50
1 I
1
1
2i.il iai7
1
1
a. 21 645
1
1
1
1 I
1
1
I 1
1 I
1
1
|
1
1 X
1 I
0.61 50
a. 71 645
1
1
1 I
0.61 SO
6.11 496
1 X
1
1
1
1.11 99
2. SI 199
0.61 SO
1*970 2HHO 7195
35
-------
LAKE NArtt : PtRRY MS.
STGKl T liUHREP : 2111
NYGAAkO TkOPHlC ST«Tl 1NOICIS
UAlf (, ?<• U 0^ 7<.
GtNUS
SPECHS
03
03
CO
00
11
00
SPECIES DIVEkSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DA1E 0* \i 7*. 06 Z5 753!i.b2
<;394. jO
0.56
0. i7
V2. Jb
7<.1.0C
36
-------
tA« I NAN( i
HI S.
?cu
CONI IhllEU
TAIA
ACM
ANH ]% IRLllE SBUS FAICAIJS,
ANK 1SIRUUESHUS FAUATJi
1. AC1CIJIAHS
ANHlSIBUOI.!>nL,S FAlCAluS
V. niRABJtIS
ASTEklUHtllA FUftdtjSA
ClfcATlUH H 1RUN01NI I LA
F. BFAChTCEiAS
CMl AH YbUKONAS
ChlChilCuCC All AN till
ACUTA
PU'ICUIUI
CCCCoM li
CGI lAiikun
CC1I lAim'K MICBUPl.k UK
C<- YPTlnCHAS
Ck IPIf MOI.'AS (POSA
CrtlOUll* *t Nt&HlN IAMA
LTC HIM 1 l» SIFll ICf f'A
: l« I,)r» vuictRi
L It ) Vl.Si'HAf HUM PulCHULUM
UlNLf lAOULATC
C IH LFSU 15 ACUIA
( Ull Itun
f L. 1 1 E f»A
! Ltl IKA •!
I IJCHHU
ocuiAlun )
ALbUii.n
' It
IUSAII CHILD cuiont
-I LUSIftA
MlUilkA DlilANS
nllUSIK* tKAMJlATA
•ilCSIBA GDANU1ATA
V. AMOUi.1 1SSIMA
ntlOSlftA I1AIICA
.IflUSlFA V.lilAhS
nltt lir.uPlo IA niNlf A
n(5USi:t>rtA Vlkioii
WIC1.AII IN
PUS II I OM
INC F. HI A
NAVlCtl A
Ml UiCMIA
UUCTS1I S
( SC III*! US I A
PANDL't INA r.UkUN
PI i lAiikun in, m i
V. ClAlHkAIUH
Ptucul
II
11GALUPSIS
bCc-ici SKUS AcuniNA ius
•iC [NUt S«Ui bICAULAIUS
SCCNHiESMuS 1(N! HUIUI'S
V. BICAUDAtUS
CUAHIIHAUDA
si HUP A
SKf l( 1C Slf A PUIAHUS
', II PH«MUUI SCUS
SIIPHAHliDl itUi AilKAlA
V. "UUI'JIA
•> II PHANUCI SCUS IINUIS
SUKI61HA AhtUilA
STHI l/RA
SINF.DFA AC US
StMDFA UINA
HlkASIKuB IllCAHS
HIRASI">U« SIAUPLCI Nl AUOfcBt
IPACHUUMUN1S
IUIAI
FLIP*
cri
CEl
CEt
CEl
CEl
CEl
CFl
CCI
CEl
CEl
CEl
CIA
COl
Cll
CEl
Cll
CEl
CEl
Ct.l
CEl
Cll
Cll
CEl
CEl
CEl
CEl
Cll
.ten
c'tn
Cll
CEL
Cl I
CU
Cl I
Cl I
CCll
CFl
CCI
COl
CEl
CEl
CEl
F 11
CPl
cm
CEl
CEl
Cll
COl
Cdl
COl
COl
COl
CEl
CFl
CEL
CEl
CEl
CEl
Cll
CEL
CU
CEl
COl
COl
CEl
Cll
AllrAl
UNI li
S XC Plk Ml
2. 7
1 .4
4.1
26. u
4.1
1 .4
1.4
13.7
12.3
1.4
9.t>
11. i
2.7
X
84
X
X
42
127
bGb
X
127
X
X
X
42
X
42
*i*
38?
X
X
1
I
42
X
I
til
194
I
I
1
I
1
84
I
Al GAl
UHlT S
S U fit HI
13.3
3.i
33.3
l^.'j
3.J
3.1
3.3
3.3
X
X
14 V
37
36 6
X
I
g
22 1
I
37
I
X
I
37
37
X
I
X
37
J
It. 71 184
• ICAl
UNITS
S 1C FIR HI
J
1
2
5
4
2.4
31. J
11 .9
2.4
19.0
2.4
14.0
2.4
4.8
4.8
I
X
X
47
X
741
X
264
I
47
X
4 76
I
I
I
47'
4J«,
X
X
X
x
X
47
1 14
114
I
not,
37
-------
IAKI NAHt: POMONA KtS.
STORET NUMBER* 2012
NYCAAKU IkUPHlC STATE INDICES
L>ATE 14 11 V4 06 25 74 U 01 74
HYXQPHYCEAN 0/0 3 01/0 E 2.C>0 E
CHIOROPHYCEAN 01/0 E 01/0 E 1.CO E
EUGIENOPHYTE 1.00 E 3.00 E J.67 E
OIAION 1.00 I 3.00 I 2.00 t
COMPOUND 06/0 E 11/0 E 9.00 E
PALfllK'S LlRGANlC POLLUTION IND IC k S
DATE 04 11 74 06 2> 7* 10 01 T,
blNUS
SPECIES
03
03
06
CO
01
JO
AVEPAGt lilVEPSITY
NUrfalR 01 TAXA
MUMbER Of SAMPLES COKPOSHtO
KAXIhUH DIVEHSITY
niNunun DIVERSITY
IlMAl UIVEKS1TV
TOTAL NUHBtR Cf 1NO1VlUUALS/Hl
EVENESS COMPONENT
KELAI1VE EVENESS
MEAN NUMliLR OF I NO I V 1 OU AL S / TA XA
NUNBEk/rtL 3F HOST AbUNbANl TAXtlN
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE 04 11 74 06 2!> 74 10 01 74
1.64
17.00
3.00
761.76
414.00
C.45
0.4C
24.35
164.00
H
i
M
KAXH
M1NH
D
N
J
KJ
I
K
1 .95
u.oo
3.00
3.5b
0.05
5412.40
3032.00
0.54
C.54
252.67
ltifc3.C'0
1.72
15.00
3.00
3.41
0.05
6640.42
3861.00
0.44
0.44
257.40
2119.00
38
-------
I AM hAntl HjflUNA HIS.
S.IOHI nun«CR> 201?
CC.NI IMJID
11 I*
Jt ?!> 7*
1C' 01 7*
H
AN> lilKUUt SBUS MlCAIUS
UHlHUtlllS Ctl
APHANIi'jM HOH FlOS-AiUAl '11
Clt Al IUK HISJMDINILIA
CHl'c,»cljPH»I»N COCCUID CUlltl COIOHT COL
cmaofiOHAS ACUIA c'1
rif^IlblLH Ctl
CSTfll'rtPNAS Cft
CSfPHlhLrhAS £kOSA HI
CIPlOFSAtI S ACUIA Cf I
IU&IENA fl C'L
EU(,lth» 1? tl1
IUCIIK» ACUS "I
lU&tEM (HRtHBEKCIl CEl
lUOLINA (.8ACIIIS Ctl
ILLlfhA IR1PUKIS ltl
CKHj&lHlUfl UCUIAIUH Cll
, -y t , 1 . M . Ci I
•tlbMKA OISIANS Cll
111 I ill-A OKANUIAIA Cll
•flL'SlKA &RANUIA1A
V. ASCUSUSS1H* Cll
HI 1 CSItiA I IAI 1C* C"
lil* ISPUPIBI* IllUli'jM* CCL
•UUSChlA IIJ-
NlUSCHIA tl Ctl
NlUSlHlA VlfnlCUlAHS Cll
PHACUS ACUflNAlUV Cll
. - • nfCAinpslS CH
t>H«CUS PSl UUUNUKJl Ill/I II Cll
^ciNiPisnus eiCAULtius coi
ill fMAXCllI StUS ltl
MEPM»«uuHCUi »JlliU»
». 1|HI>IUIA l>l
'unmiiA tn
* Cll
tvucr:fcA ACUS l-'l
UNI IS
XI Plh Rl
1 1
litJ
. 11.3
r 4.8
].;
3 9.7
i 16.1
.)«.*
ls7
9*
<"(3
1
1
•
1
«t«
I
X
All»l
UNI1 S
1C PIR HI
!./>
1 . ^
l.f
i*.'(
IV.)
1 .2
ZO.J
*
1
1,1
11
K
S 7
M
< 119
753
I
g
I
*T
»01
UMIIS
1C PEfc 11
??.a
11.1
s*.»
it.!
I
Jl
*
«>?
X
2
J
I
46
x
X
It*
*>?
I
TUKl
39
-------
I ARE r.Artt: TUiKUNlfj klS.
SlflRfcT NUMBER: 2013
E.A IE
MYIOPHYCE AN
CHIGfcOPHYCI AN
tUGlENUPHYTE
DJ*TO«
IfcOPHIC SlATt INDICES
10 7«. J6 2}.00 t
3.00 [
a.oo E
O.bO I
1^5 I
I't.Q t
DA ff
GENUS
SPECIES
'S URGANIC PDLIUIIUN INUICtS
10 Tt Ob t* 7*i 10 Ce 7<.
01
00
01
00
SPtCIES D1VIRS11Y AND AbUNOANCE 1NU1CES
AVtPAGt DIVERSITY
NUMbtR UF TAXA
NUMBER OF SAMPLES CUWPOS1TED
DIVERSITY
DIVERSITY
TOTAL DIVERSITY
TCTAl NOKBtk CJf ]NH VIOUAlS/ML
IVENtSS CIWPLiNENT
RELATIVE EVENISS
MEAN NUKEtK Of IND 1V 1 DUALS / TAXA
OF MUST AbUNLJANr TAXPK
DATE
H
S
n
MAXH
MlNH
D
N
04i 10 Tt 06 2*
1.73
17.00
2.00
O.C6
37C1.00
217.71
1. 76
17.00
2.CO
4.09
0.26
119S.C4
679.00
0.<.3
205.00
10 02 Tt
3.01
23.00
2.00
S.52
514.00
0.67
0.63
22. 35
103.00
40
-------
I AM MArtl : ILSUMIl) PIS.
I fiunBlR:
CUNTIMUfO
1 0 7S
1C
1 1
ANAUAtNA 12
ANK ISIRUUt SflUS MllAIUS
V. MlPAtlllS
ClkAlllir. HIPUNDINIllA
f. FLBCGlOtS
CHI AnruunON/ii
S ACUI«
CIJI I AS IkOH
CRUC1CINU IIIR4PIDU
Ck»PTi,ruMAS IKOSA
CYClimilA MIIGHIN U' SHI1HJ1
V. fUf HA
! Ul UKINA
f lid I I N«
AC US
EHHIMBifOl 1
IU(,lll>«
lU(ttr»
lUClllsA
c ir NL'i I
UP.
•»Y» dS IOHA
< U CIIMK It HA ClINlDfTA
Ml I USIRA U ISIANS
nl I US1KA CRANULAIA
V. AMOUStliSln*
NAVICCIA SAllHAHluB
V. iNtEKHfDU
MI I2SCHIA
01U1CMIA ft
HITJSIMIA AP1CU1AI* t
NITnCMlA SI6HU10I*
CSl UIAIMU
P1NHAH OUTOfl
ptIACUS <1
PMACUS «i
PIUCUS ACUH1KA1US
-.CNRUIOiRIA StllCfPA
S ILPl'AHIICll iCbS
Sit PMAXUOI SCUS A'ilKAtA
V. HlNUIUl*
< If PHANJ01SCUS HANl/jCHlI
UlNA
(jHfl
1 U
1 II
Cf I
Cfl
Cll
CEL
Cfl
I III
COL
Cfl
Cfl
Cll
CIL
Cll
CEL
CFL
Cfl
Cfl
Ctl
cn.
CIL
Cll
CEl
CCl
Cll
III
CU
III
(11
Cll
(tl
1 U
Ctl
tu
CEl
Cll
Cll
Cll
Cll
CIL
Cll
Cfl
s
zc
I
1
a
X
ZJ',5
X
s
2
1
3
103
X
3*
bt
I
I
3*
103
*
x
X
69
*
X
I
X
3*
>
3*
X
t
\ 3*
679
41
-------
lAKt NAMES TUITLE CRtEK KFS.
STCIREI NUMBER: 2014
NYGAARl) TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE C4 II 74 Ob 25 74 10 02 74
WYXUPHYCEAN Gl/0 E 0/0 0 02/0 £
CHLCjfrOPHYCt AN 04/0 I 02/0 t 09/0 E
EUGLENOPHYTE 0.40 t 1.00 E 0.09 ?
OIATOH 0.29 ? 02/0 E 1.17 t
COMPOUND 09/0 L Ot/0 t 19/0 t
PAIH£R*S UftCANlC PCllUlION INDICES
OATf 04 11 74 Ob 2i 74 10 02 74
GENUS
SPECIES
09
03
01
CO
03
00
SPECIES DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE INDICES
DATE
04 11 74 06 25 74 10 02 74
AVERAGE UIVCKSITY
NUKBIR Uf 1AXA
uf SAMPLES COMPOSITED
HAX1HUN UIVFRSTTY
hlNUNUM DIVERSITY
TOTAL DIVEKSITY
TOTAL NUMBER UF I NO 1V IOUAIS/ML
EVENESS COMPONENT
RELATIVE EVtNESS
MEAN NUMtiEK (JF INb I V I OUAtS / TAXA
(If MOST ABUNDANT TAXON
H
S
M
HAXH
H1NH
D
N
J
KJ
L
K
0.95
Z2.00
3.00
4.4b
0.02
13C4C.65
13727.00
C.21
C.21
623. 9!>
10947.00
O.V5
9.00
3.00
3.17
0.05
1935. 15
2017.00
0.30
0.29
226.33
17'ui3.GO
2. 15
30.00
3.00
4.91
0. 10
8213.00
3B20.00
0.44
0.43
127.33
Ib41.00
42
-------
IAKE NAME: I'D III I COEEK PI S.
CUM INU10
';•• 1 I 7
-------
LAKE NAMt: WILSON RES.
STORET NUMBER: 2015
NYGAARD TROPHIC STATE INDICES
DATE 04 12 74 06 26 7*. 10 01 74
CHLOPTJPHYCEAN
EUGlENOPHlfTE
DIATOM
COMPOUND
3.00 t
9. GO I
0.17 ?
0.29 ?
16.0 I
o/o o
07/0 t
0/07 T
0/01 ?
07/0 I
i.oo £
2.00 E
0.13 ?
0.50 £
3.60 £
PALMER'S ORGANIC PULIUT10N 1NOICIS
DATE 0^ lH T, 06 26 70
918^.00
O.i7
0.57
3i7.93
3
1103.52
836.00
0.37
3.35
69.67
5.7&.UO
2. 5?
28.00
3.00
4.61
0.08
11476.08
4S)54. JO
0.52
0.52
162.64
1847. 00
44
-------
I AM KA«E : nil SUN KES.
<|['KI NlinbEDI !Cii"i
IAX*
All INAS UUH
AMI 1 SIkuDt SHUS (ALCAIUS
V. nikAdlllS
ASIteUNtLlA FUP.HOSA
V. GtAUllIHA
60 l» rtCL/CCUi SUDHICUS
ClfrAT IUH MlBJNblNE Ll»
F . SCLJl 1 ICUH
CHlAHYtUHONAS
CHKCOtCJNAS ACUlA
til STU iLlH
CDC LUKE IS ?
CCJ[ lA'.Tkim nUBOf I fun
i.r,ir»k ijn
CL.5KAK IU1 •)
COSr/sHtin 12
CtaCICLNlA GUAOkAlA
CH-lKlNl* lEIk&PE!>IA
CS It U.nUNA S
Cfr^unuNAS EKOS*
LAC ULUUICCUPSIS I^Ri'oUl
OIHICIM I b bHIIHH
V. Ponli*
UPlljCSAl I S »CUI»
II AKAIC1 IHK 1> GILA1 1HL^«
IN'fJMUHi IS ALAI«
I I1 til N*
(0(,l[H» Ck AC I I IS
ctnuOl jnluh AlBUlun ?
'^tKjilCHA )
"1C KUCTSII 5 AtRUGlMllS*
r ICPOCirSUS 1NCEH*
••II.SCMIA (1
I!L
n
I
1
1
1
14. M IS 13
1 X
1 >
1 X
1
1
1
l.Cl <»)<•
1
4.11 377
6.71 t,li
1
|
1
I
1.
1
1
1
1
1
1
U.ll 17
1 1 . fcl 1.81
1 X
l.Cl <)<.
1
1 X
1 »
l
1 i
l
l i
l.Cl I".
i
i
12.31 1130
O.il ".7
37. 41 3<.3b
1 I
|
AlCAl
Jt.ll 'j
S XC PI >• HI
1
?
3
<,
L8.b
Jb .b
b.^
6.?
X
X
X
574
I
X
1^7
>
i^
X
5?
I
AlCAl
UNI IS
S 11 UK PL
i
<.
j
1
t.
\ - *
1
0.91 43
1
1
1
1
1
1
1.41 86
1 I
1
1.41 66
0.41 *3
1 I
1 I
1 >
?.ei i<">
i
!.•»! tfc
; . e i i <•<>
i
i
i i
i
i
i
l >
i
i i
l i
l >
i
i.7i ?sa
0.91 43
?5.il 1160
1
1 1
1
1 «
1 >
0.9| 43
| >
1
1
1 I
4, '.61 1847
1
13. ?l eCl
1
1
1 1) 1 A I
45
-------
TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
(Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
EPA-600/3-79-063
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
DISTRIBUTION OF PHYTOPLANKTON IN KANSAS LAKES
6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
5. REPORT DATE
June 1979
S.C. Hern, V.W. Lambou, F.A. Morris,
M.K. Morris, W.D. Taylor
8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Office of Research and Development
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Las Vegas, NV 89114
10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
1BD884
11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency-Las Vegas, NV
Office of Research and Development
Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
Las Vegas. NV 89114
13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
03-15-74 to 11-20-74
14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
EPA/600/07
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
This is a data report presenting the species and abundance of phytoplankton
in the 15 lakes sampled by the National Eutrophication Survey in the State of
Kansas. Results from the calculation of several water quality indices are also
included (Nygaard's Trophic State Index, Palmer's Organic Pollution Index, and
species diversity and abundance indices).
17.
KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
DESCRIPTORS
*aquatic microbiology
lakes
*phytoplankton
water quality
b.lDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDEDTERMS
Kansas
lake eutrophication
Nygaard's trophic indices
Palmer's organic pollu-
tion indices
Species diversity and
abundance indices
c. COSATI Held/Croup
06 C,
08 H
13 B
M
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT
RELEASE TO PUBLIC
19. SECURITY CLASS (This Report)
UNCLASSIFIED
21 NO. OF PAGES
52
,SS (This page)
22. PRICE
A04
EPA Form 2220-1 (Rev. 4-77) PREVIOUS EDITION
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1979-^83-091/2108
------- |