c/EPA
            United States
            Environmental Protection
            Agency
            Environmental Research
            Laboratory
            Corvallis OR 9^330
EPA-600 3-80-040
March 1980
            Research and Development
The  Fate and
Effects of Crude  Oil
Spilled  on Subarctic
Permafrost Terrain in
Interior Alaska

-------
                RESEARCH REPORTING SERIES

Research reports of the Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency,  have been grouped into nine series. These nine broad cate-
gories were established to facilitate further development and application of en-
vironmental technology. Elimination  of traditional grouping was consciously
planned to foster technology transfer and a maximum interface in related fields.
The nine series are:

      1.   Environmental Health Effects Research
      2.   Environmental Protection Technology
      3.   Ecological Research
      4.   Environmental Monitoring
      5.   Socioeconomic Environmental Studies
      6.   Scientific and Technical  Assessment Reports (STAR)
      7.   Interagency Energy-Environment Research and Development
      8.   "Special'1 Reports
      9.   Miscellaneous Reports

This report has been assigned to the ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH series. This series
describes research on the effects of pollution on humans, plant and animal spe-
cies, and materials. Problems are assessed for their long- and short-term influ-
ences. Investigations include formation, transport, and pathway studies to deter-
mine the fate of pollutants and their effects. This work provides the technical basis
for setting standards to minimize undesirable changes in living organisms in the
aquatic, terrestrial,  and atmospheric environments.
This document is available to the public through the National Technical Informa-
tion Service, Springfield, Virginia  22161.

-------
                                               EPA-600/3-80-040
                                               March 19,80
             THE FATE AND EFFECT OF CRUDE OIL
          SPILLED ON SUBARCTIC PERMAFROST TERRAIN
                    IN INTERIOR ALASKA
                            by
L.  A.  Johnson, E.  B.  Sparrow, T.  F.  Jenkins, C.  M.  Collins
            C. V.  Davenport and T.  T.  McFadden
                  Alaskan Projects Office
     U.S.  Army Cold Regions and Engineering Laboratory
                  Fairbanks, Alaska 99703
               Grant Number EPA-IAF-D7-0794

                      Project Officer
                       Ronald Gordon
        Corvallis Environmental  Research Laboratory
                  Con/all is, Oregon 97330
        CORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LABORATORY
            OFFICE OF  RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
           U.S.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                  CORVALLIS,  OREGON 97330

-------
                              DISCLAIMER

     This report has been reviewed by Corvallis Environmental Research
Laboratory, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, and approved for
publication.  Approval does not signify that the contents necessarily
reflect the views- and policies of the U. S. Environmental Protection
Agency, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute
endorsement or recommendation for use.
                                    ii

-------
                                   FOREWORD

     Effective  regulatory  and   enforcement  actions  by  the  Environmental
Protection Agency would be virtually impossible without sound scientific data on
pollutants  and  their  impact  on  environmental  stability  and human  health.
Responsibility for building this data base has been assigned to EPA's Office of
Research and Development and its 15 major field installations, one of which is
the Corvallis Environmental  Research Laboratory.

     The primary mission of the Corvallis Laboratory is research on the effects
of environmental  pollutants on terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems;
the behavior,  effects and control of pollutants in lakes and streams; and the
development of predictive models on the movement of  pollutants  in the biosphere.

     This publication reports  results of a  study  to  determine the effects of
crude oil spills on permafrost terrain in subarctic  interior Alaska.
                                   Thomas A. Murphy, Director
                                   Con/all is Environmental Research Laboratory
                                       iii

-------
                               Abstract

     This study was conducted to determine both the short and long-term
effects of spills of hot Prudhoe Bay crude oil on permafrost terrain in
subarctic interior Alaska.  Two experimental oil spills of 7570 liters
(2000 gallons) each on 500 m2 test plots were made at a forest site under-
lain by permafrost near Fairbanks, Alaska.  The oil spills, one in
winter and one in summer, were conducted to evaluate their effect during
these two seasonal extremes.  Oil movement, thermal regime, botanical
effects, microbiological responses, permafrost impact, and composition
of the oil in the soil were monitored for two years.

     The results indicate that oil movement during the winter spill
occurred within the surface moss layer beneath the snow.  In the summer
spill, movement of the oil was primarily below the moss in the organic
soil.  The oil movement in the summer spill was more rapid, moving 30 m
downslope in the first 24 hours and 41 m total through the summer.  The
oil in the winter spill moved only 18 m downslope in the first day and
stopped.  Remobilization occurred in the spring allowing the oil in the
winter spill to move an additional 17 m.  The total area affected by the
summer spill was nearly one and one-half times as large as the winter
spill  (303 m2 vs 188 m2 or 40 m2/m3 of oil vs 24 m2/nPof oil).

     The heat of the initial spilled oil had little measureable effect
on the underlying frozen soil at the time of the winter spill or on the
depth  of thaw in the summer spill.  However, significant changes in
depth  of thaw occurred following two full thaw seasons.  The greatest
increases in  thaw depths occurred in areas where the surface was black-
ened by oil.

     Chemical studies have shown that evaporation of volatile components
is the most significant natural weathering process  in  the  first two
years. C^ and C-2 components were lost from surface  oil in  the first 24
hours  with only  small concentrations of components  smaller than Cg
present after five months.  There was somewhat slower  evaporation of
volatiles from oil carried deeper in the  soil profile.  Changes in
composition usually  attributable  to microbial degradation have not been
observed.

     The  indigenous  soil microbial populations responded differently  to
winter and summer oil applications.  The  responses  ranged  from inhibition
to stimulation,  with stimulation  of growth and activity appearing to
predominate.

     Vegetation  showed  both  immediate  and long  term damage effects  from
the  oil.  Damage was greatest  near  the  top of  the  slope and  in surface oil
blackened areas.   Deciduous  species showed damage  more rapidly than
evergreen species.   Additional black spruce  died up to two years  after
the  spills.
      This report was submitted in fulfillment of grant number EPA-IAF-D7-
0794 under  the sponsorship of the U.S.  Environmental Protection  Agency.
This report  covers a period from 1975  to 1978 and work was completed as  of
October 1979.
                                    iv

-------
                           TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                 Page

Abstract	    iv

List of Tables	    vi

List of Figures	viii

Summary	    xl

Introduction	     1

Methods

     Site Description  	     2
     Oil Application	     4
     Physical Characterization	     5
     Thermal Characterization 	     7
     Oil and Oily Soil Characterization	     7
     Soil Microbiological Methodology  	     9
     Vegetation	    12

Results and Discussion

     Oil Movement	    13
     Effects on Permafrost	    19
     Compositional Changes	    22
     Microbiological Responses	    36
     Oil Effects on Vegetation	    63

Conclusions	    74

Recommendations	    76

Literature Cited	    78

Appendices	    85

-------
                           LIST OF TABLES

                                                                Page

1.  AVERAGE THAW DEPTH (CM)	   21

2.  INITIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PRUDHOE BAY CRUDE OIL USED IN
    STUDY	   23

3.  LOSS OF VOLATILES FROM SPILL PLOTS	   25

4.  ALKANE/AROMATIC AND PRISTANE/n-C17 RATIOS FOR TOPPED SOIL
    EXTRACTS (CARIBOU-POKER CREEK AREA SPILLS) 	   31

5.  ALKANE/AROMATIC AND PRISTANE/n-C.., RATIOS FOR SAMPLES FROM
    OTHER ALASKAN SPILLS	   33
6.  ANALYSES OF SAMPLES COLLECTED IN JULY 1978	   35

7.  1976 HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIAL COUNTS (X 106/g SOIL) IN
    OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS	   37

8.  1977 HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIAL COUNTS (X 106/g SOIL) IN
    OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS	   37

9.  1978 HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIAL COUNTS (X 106/g SOIL) IN
    OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL PLOTS)	   38

0.  1976 FILAMENTOUS FUNGAL PROPAGULE COUNTS (X 10 /g SOIL)
    IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS 	   39

1.  1977 FILAMENTOUS FUNGAL PROPAGULE COUNTS (X 104/g SOIL)
    IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS 	   39

2.  1978 FILAMENTOUS FUNGAL PROPAGULE COUNTS (X 104/g SOIL)
    IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS 	   40

3.  1976 YEAST COUNTS (X 105/g SOIL) IN OILED AND UNOILED
    (CONTROL) PLOTS	   40

4.  1977 YEAST COUNTS (X 105/g SOIL) IN OILED AND UNOILED
    (CONTROL) PLOTS	   41

5.  1978 YEAST COUNTS (X 105/g SOIL) IN OILED AND UNOILED
    (CONTROL) PLOTS	   41

6.  1976 COUNTS (X 105/g SOIL) OF PROTEOLYTIC BACTERIA IN
    OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS	   42
                                  VI

-------
                                                                 Page

17.   1976 COUNTS (X 105/g SOIL) OF ANAEROBIC BACTERIA IN OILED
     AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS	   43

18.   1976 IN VITRO SOIL RESPIRATION RATES (mg CO /24 HR/100 g
     SOIL) IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS	   57

19.   1977 AND 1978 IN VITRO SOIL RESPIRATION RATES (mg C02/24
     HR/100 g SOIL) IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS.  ...   57

20.   1976 IN SITU SOIL RESPIRATION (g CO /24 HR/m2) IN OILED
     AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS	   58

21.   1976 SOIL WATER CONTENT (%) IN OIL AND UNOILED (CONTROL)
     PLOTS	   58

22.   1977 AND 1978 SOIL WATER CONTENT (%) IN OILED AND UNOILED
     (CONTROL) PLOTS	   59

23.   OIL CONTENT (%) IN SOIL 5 m DOWNSLOPE FROM POINT OF OIL
     APPLICATION	   60

24.   NUTRIENT CONTENT OF BLACK SPRUCE FOLIAGE  	   67

25.   MORTALITY OF BLACK SPRUCE	   68

26.  PRE-(1976 AND 1977) AND POST  (1978) VEGETATION ANALYSTS
     (AVE % CHANGE)	   69

27.  RESPIRATION OF ECTOTROPHIC MYCORRHIZAL FEEDER ROOTS.  ...   73
                                    vii

-------
                            List of Figures

                                                                 Page

 1.  Location of oil spill site near Fairbanks, Alaska	     3

 2.  View looking downslope prior to oil application on summer
     spill plot	     4

 3.  Typical profile of Saulich soil at Caribou-Poker Creek
     spill sites	     5

 4.  Oil being spilled along a 5 m length of perforated pipe
     at winter spill plot	     6
 5.  Following oil flow downslope on the summer plot by visually
     inspecting wooden dowels 	     6

 6.  One meter square quadrat used for sampling vegetation.  .  .    12

 7.  Snow melting near the header during hot crude oil application
     on the winter plot	    13

 8.  Downslope movement of oil follow spillage	    15

 9.  Surface and subsurface oiled areas 	    16

10.  Vertical penetration of oil into soil profile	    18

11.  Cross section thaw depths in 1977 and 1978 at 3 meters
     downslope of oil applications	    20

12.  Gas chromatogram of the crude oil used for the Caribou-Poker
     spills obtained on a Dexsil Scot column	    23

13.  Headspace chromatograms of oil taken from the pool on the
     winter spill plot	    26

14.  Headspace chromatogram of oily soil from the winter spill
     plot, 17 months after spillage	    27

15.  Headspace chromatogram of oily soil from the summer plot,
     12 months after spillage 	    28

16.  Headspace chromatogram of oil soil from the Prudhoe Bay
     spill site, 12 months after spillage 	    29

17.  Chromatograms of oil extracted from soil taken from
     several Alaskan oil spill sites	    34
                                   Vlll

-------
                                                                 Page

18.   1976 MPN counts of denitrifying bacteria in oiled and
     unoiled (control) plots	    44

19.   1977 MPN counts of denitrifying bacteria in oiled and
     unoiled (control) plots	    45

20.   1978 MPN counts of denitrifying bacteria in oiled and
     unoiled (control) plots	    46

21.   1976 MPN counts of cellulose-utilizing bacteria in
     oiled and unoiled (control) plots	    47

22.   1976 MPN counts of cellulose-utilizing fungi in oiled
     and unoiled (control) plots	    48

23.   1976 MPN of oil-utilizing bacteria in oiled and unoiled
     (control) plots	    49

24.   1976 MPN counts of oil-utilizing yeasts in oiled and
     unoiled (control) plots	    50

25.   1977 and 1978 MPN counts of oil-utilizing bacteria in
     oiled and unoiled (control) plots	    51

26.  1977 and 1978 MPN counts of oil-utilizing yeasts in  oiled
     and unoiled (control) plots	    52

27.  1976 MPN counts  of oil-utilizing filamentous fungi in
     oiled and unoiled (control) plots	   54

28.  1977 and 1978 MPN counts of oil-utilizing filamentous
     fungi  in oiled  and unoiled (control) plots  	   55
 29.   Respiration in situ in oiled  and  unoiled  (control)  plots
      in 1977	    56

 30.   Cottongrass tussocks growing  despite being  surrounded  by
      surface oil and dead moss  and lichens	    64

 31.   Soil pit for determining rooting  habits  and belowground
      oil movement 	
 32.   Cottongrass (Eriophorum vaginatum)  roots  growing through
      oil soaked soil	    66

 33.   Steele Creek oil spill along the trans-Alaska Pipeline
      system 	

 34.   Flowchart representing the observed effects of a massive
      crude oil spill on a subarctic permafrost site	    75
                                    IX

-------
Acknowledgements:

     The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of the following
persons:

     Dr.  Fred Deneke, U.S.  Forest Service,  St.  Paul Minnesota.,  for his
guidance and consultation in experimental design of vegetation studies;

     Dr.  Brent McCown, Institute for Environmental Studies, University
of Wisconsin, Madison, for his review and critique of vegetation studies
and his review of this report;

     Dr.  Charles Slaughter, Institute of Northern Forestry, Fairbanks,
Alaska, for his help in project initiation, planning and preliminary
site work;

     Dr.  Arthur Linkins, Department of Biology, Virginia Polytechnic
Institute, for his assistance in providing data on root respiration;

     Mrs. Elinor Huke and members of the USACRREL drafting group, under
the supervision of Mr. Ed Perkins, for preparation of illustrations
used in this report;

     Dr.  Ronald Gordon, Arctic Environmental Research Station, for his
consultation on and critique of the microbiological studies and his
review of this report;

     Mr.  Paul Sellmann, USA CRREL, for his review of this report;

     Mr.  Daniel Leggett, USA CRREL, for his help in sampling the winter
spill and his review of this report;

     Ms.  Ellen Foley and Ms. Helen Hare, both of USA CRREL, for their
technical support in analytical chemical determinations;

     Mrs. Ruth McFadden, Ms. Joan Forshaug and Mr. Robert Jackson, for-
merly of USEPA, for technical support of the microbiological studies.
                                    x

-------
                                SUMMARY

     In February and July, 1976, two experimental 757CH (2000 gal) oil
spills of hot Prudhoe Bay crude were conducted in subarctic interior
Alaska in the Caribou-Poker Creeks Research Watershed.  The following
types of information were obtained during the subsequent three year
study:

     1.   The movement of the oil downslope with time
     2.   The movement and current presence of oil in the soil profile
     3.   The change in oil composition with time after spillage
     4.   The responses of various soil microbiological populations
     5.   The botanical effects of oil contamination

     The following results and conclusions were obtained.

1)   There are distinct differences in the effects of a winter oil spill
and a summer oil spill.

2)   In both winter and summer spills, oil flowed downslope following
the microtopography of the site for distances of 35 and 41.5 m, respec-
tively.  The total area impacted by the summer spill was nearly one and
one half times as large as the winter spill (303 m2 vs 188 m2).  Down-
slope movement in the summer spill was primarily in the organic soil.
In the winter spill, initial movement occurred beneath the snow, over
and through the moss layer, resulting in a much larger area of surface
flow (76.3 m2), relative to the summer spill (30.3 m2), respectively.
Oil movement stopped after one day in the winter spill.  The oil then
remained immobilized until snow melt when it moved further downslope,
this time generally in the organic soil.

3)   The total area impacted by these spills was surprisingly small
primarily due to the ability of the thick moss layer and organic soil to
absorb large quantities of oil.  In addition, evaporation of volatiles
reduced the volume and mobility of the oil.   The average oil content in
the impacted areas for the winter and summer spills was 41 and 25 1/m2,
respectively (or 24 and 40 m^/m^ of oil).

4)   The location of oil in the soil profile differed in the two spills.
In the upslope portion of the winter spill plot, the oil resides primarily
in the moss and organic soil.   Further downslope, where movement occurred
after spring breakup, the oil resides primarily in the organic soil.   In
the upslope portion of the summer spill, most of the oil is in the
organic soil, but oil has penetrated as deep as 8 cm into  the mineral
soil.  In areas further downslope in the summer spill, the oil is pres-
ent in a narrow band in the organic soil.
                                    xi

-------
5)   The initial heat input of the hot crude oil did not significantly
affect either the frozen soil surface in the winter spill or the depth
of thaw in the summer spill.

6)   After two full thaw seasons,  increased depths of thaw have been
observed in the oiled area, with the greatest thaw below visibly oiled
(blackened) surface areas.   If this trend continues, thermokarsting and
reduction in slope stability could result.

7)   Compositional change in the spilled crude oil during the first two
years is primarily a result of evaporation of volatiles.  No observable
translocation of water soluble components was found below the area of
physical oil movement.  The type of oil degradation usually attributed
to microbial activity was not observed in the first two years after
spillage.

8)   The oil will probably remain largely intact for long periods in the
soil unless some measures are used to accelerate oil degradation.

9)   During the first growing season after the winter spill, the fila-
mentous fungal population was inhibited whereas the heterotrophic
bacterial population was stimulated.  After the summer spill, a brief
initial depression of both the filamentous fungal and bacterial popula-
tions occurred but was followed by a general enhancement.  In both oil
spill plots, denitrifying, proteolytic, oil-utilizing and cellulose-
utilizing microorganisms (including yeasts) were favorably affected by the
oil spills.

10)  During the second and third growing  seasons following the oil
spills, the filamentous fungal populations were inhibited in both oiled
plots.  Inhibition was greater in the winter than in the summer plot.
The heterotrophic bacteria and yeasts were stimulated in both oiled
plots, with greater  stimulation in the summer plot.  Numbers of denitri-
fying bacteria, oil-utilizing bacteria and oil-utilizing yeasts in the
oiled plots remained elevated.

11)  After an  initial decrease 24 hours after the oil spills, in vitro
soil respiration generally increased  in both oiled plots relative to  the
control  for the duration of  the study.  Soil respiration in situ* in-
creased  in the oiled plots only in areas  where plants killed by  the oil
were not  removed.  This indicates that the increased substrate  from
dead plant material  is at  least partially responsible for the increased
soil respiration.

12)  The  effects of  crude  oil on  indigenous  soil microbial  populations
and  their activities appear  to be both direct and  indirect.  The  fila-
mentous  fungal population  may be  inhibited by toxic  crude oil  components
and  reduced  aeration while other microbial populations  and  in vitro**

  * In  place,  on  site
** In  the laboratory
                                    xii

-------
soil respiration may be stimulated by the addition of carbon substrate
in the oil and in plants damaged or killed by the oil.

13)  Vegetation mortality was highest within areas of surface flows in
the upslope portions of the plots.  Damage to vegetation was delayed and
reduced in areas which were both further downslope and impacted by
subsurface flows.

14)  In general, deciduous species showed the most rapid injury.
Evergreen species displayed more delayed symptoms.  Injuries have con-
tinued to appear up to the present with additional mortality of black
spruce in the winter spill site through the third growing season.

15)  Rooting characteristics, as well as above ground growth form, signi-
ficantly influence sensitivity to the oil.  Cottongrass tussocks,  with
their vertical rooting habit, appear to be the most oil resistant species
on this site.

16)  There is no evidence of recovery by vegetation in areas of surface
flows in these spills.  Other crude oil spills in Alaska have shown some
vegetative recovery within the same time frame, possibly because of
greater soil moisture.

17)  Because of the complex interactions of the effects of crude oil
spills, a variety of scientific disciplines is necessary to assess
environmental impact.
                                   xiii

-------
INTRODUCTION

     During the last 15 years, oil exploration and development, spurred
on by increasing demand for oil and declining petroleum reserves in
temperate regions, has been increasing in the Arctic and Subarctic.
One large pipeline for transporting crude oil, the Trans-Alaskan Pipeline
System (TAPS), was completed in 1977 and other smaller ones have been
constructed in Canada and the Soviet Union.  These projects have resulted
in spills of crude oil and the inevitability of more spills remains.

     Regulatory agencies and scientists became interested in ascer-
taining the environmental effects of petroleum spills as soon as develop-
ment of petroleum reserves began in the northern regions.  In the early
seventies a number of small scale studies were begun to document the
effects of spills, (Deneke e^ ^1., 1975; Hutchinson et al., 1974) while
other studies examined biological recovery after spills (Hunt, 1972;
Cook and Westlake, 1974; McGill, 1977).  Other individuals recorded the
effects of refined petroleum spills along a military pipeline in Alaska
(Deneke jet a^. , 1975; Rickard and Deneke, 1972; Hunt et_ al_., 1973).
However, before 1975 only one study, in the Mackenzie Valley of Canada,
had attempted to experimentally determine the effects of larger petroleum
spills (MacKay et_ _aJL. ,  1974; Hutchinson jet _ajl., 1974; Cook and Westlake,
1974).  Recently a collection of articles summarizing past and ongoing
oil spill research in Alaska, including interim reports of the research
presented here, have been published  (Arctic 31(3),  1978).

     In  1975  the Alaskan Projects Office of the U.  S. Army Cold Regions
Research and  Engineering Laboratory  (USACRREL) received funding from  the
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Arctic Environmental Research
Station, to study the fate and effects of crude oil spilled on perma-
frost terrain.  This  study was specifically designed to simulate the
size and location of  an actual crude oil spill from a functioning pipeline.
An open black spruce  stand, representative of interior subarctic Alaska,
was selected  in the  Caribou-Poker Creeks Research Watershed.   Two spill
plots were designated and 7570 £  (2000 gal) of hot  (57°C) Prudhoe Bay
crude oil were applied  to each.  The spills,  one in winter and one  in
summer, were  conducted  in order  to assess differences in behavior and
impact of  the crude  oil at  the two temperature extremes of the subarctic
climate.

     There were four overall  objectives of  the study:

 1)    to  document  the physical effects  of crude oil  spills on black
 spruce forest,  in the interior of Alaska,  emphasizing the mode of  trans-
 port, area of impact with  time,  and  effects  on the  underlying  permafrost;

 2)    to  determine the fate  of petroleum, once spilled in  subarctic
 terrestrial  environments;

-------
3)   to evaluate the effect of crude oil spills on soil microbial popu-
lations and their activities;

4)   to evaluate the effects of crude oil spills on vegetation.

     In order to meet these multidisciplinary objectives the following
personnel were engaged on the project:

1.   Geologist:  to determine the physical extent of oil spread and
     thermal effects on underlying permafrost (Charles Collins);

2.   Engineer:  to determine the factors influencing the thermal regime
     of the soil and design of spill systems (Terry McFadden);

3.   Chemist:  to determine the changes in the chemical composition
     of the petroleum over time and over the extent of the spill
     (Thomas Jenkins);

4.   Microbiologist:  to determine the response of soil microbial
     populations to winter and summer oil spills (Elena Sparrow and
     Charlotte Davenport);

5.   Botanist:  to determine the effects of the crude oil upon the
     existing vegetation species and the extent of their recovery
     (Larry Johnson).
                                METHODS

Site Description

     The study site lies in the lower reaches of the Caribou-Poker
Creeks Research Watershed, 48 km north-east of Fairbanks, Alaska (Fig.
1).  The site is about 300 m above sea level and situated on a moderate
(7-8%) west-facing slope.  Two study plots, each 10 m by 50 m with the
long axis downslope, were established for oil application.  Control
areas were designated nearby.  The closest stream is Poker Creek, 800 m
downslope of the site.  An abandoned water diversion ditch lies between
the study site and Poker Creek, guarding against inadvertent oil con-
tamination.

     The study site is an open black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.)
Britt, Stearns & Pogg.) stand (Fig. 2) with a shrub understory of
Labrador tea (Ledum decumbens (Ait.) Hult.) and Ledum groenlandicum
((Oeder) Hult.), resin birch (Betula glandulosa Michx.), and blueberry
(Vaccinium uligonosum L.).  A few scattered willows (Salix spp.) occur
in the area.  Mosses and lichens cover 50% or more of the ground surface
and various herbs can be found.  Cottongrass tussocks (Eriophorum
vaginatum L.) have scattered distribution but are of local importance
(Troth et al., 1975).

-------
65°I5'-
65°00'
            Fairbonks  \

           ALASKA  I
                                     0     5      10     15
                                     I  'i' 'i ' i1—i—i	'	
                                                              20km.
                                                          lOmi.
                      ~  Caribou-Poker Cr.
                          Watershed-
                                            OIL SPILL STUDY AREA
     148
Fairbanks' 24km(l5mi)
                                                                  I47»
      Figure 1.   Location of oil spill site near Fairbanks, Alaska.
      Elevated crosswalks were installed at 5 m intervals across  the
 treatment plots to allow direct access to the entire surface of  the
 plots with minimum disturbance from surface trampling  (Fig. 2) .

      The soil on the site is typical of the Saulich series  found in  the
 lower slopes of the watershed (Rieger et al. , 1972) .   A typical  profile
 consists of 25 to 5 cm of moss (0,), 8 to 0 cm of reddish-brown  peat
       0 to 8 cm of brown mixed organic and silt loam  (A}) and  greyish
 silt loam extending to permafrost (€2) (Fig. 3).  The  soil,  a histic
 pergelic cryaquept, is poorly drained with an active layer depth  of
 15 cm to 50 cm depending on the thickness of the organic mat and  proxi-
 mity to shrubs and trees.  The pH of both the organic  and mineral soils
 is acidic, generally about pH 4 (Troth et_ a^. ,  1975; Rieger  et  al. ,
 1972).

-------
Figure 2.  View  looking downslope prior to oil application on summer
           spill plot  (note elevated crosswalks installed for access
           to plot).

Oil Application

     The crude oil  for the study was obtained from Prudhoe Bay and
hauled by truck  in  55 gal drums to an area near the site.  The oil was
transferred to a 2000 gal tank and transported to the spill site on a
large tracked vehicle.  The oil was heated using heat tapes, to 57°C,
in a closed system  to preserve the volatile components, and was spilled
through a 5 m length of perforated pipe (Fig. 4) at about 170 1/min over
a 45 minute period.  The winter spill was conducted on 26 February 1976
at an ambient air temperature of about -5°C (23°F).  The summer spill

-------
               TV^-VV. '"T^v-. i >-'•->' -V.-I "* Y -".^"'TV^S V-n "y i^**^**. I • ^ . "TT^C ^S^-yy T^"-?^1 • ^ I
               pP^^M": :  :^:(bi^^^^-^:^-^
                0, — Moss
                  — Reddish-brown Peat
°2 — Reddish-brown Peat          ~i
A,  - Brown Mixed Organic and Silt LoamJ0r9anic
                C2 — Grey Silt Loam
Figure 3.  Typical profile of Saulich soil at Caribou-Poker Creek
           spill sites.


was carried out on 14 July 1976 to approximately coincide with  the peak
of the growing season and maximum yearly temperatures.   The air  tempera-
ture during the summer spill was 25°C (77°F).   In each  test 7570  £ (2000
gal) of oil were spilled.

Physical Characterization

     The rate of oil flow downslope following  the spill was  determined
by probing with wooden dowels at predetermined  locations  on  a grid with
one meter intervals (Fig. 5).  The presence  of  the crude  oil was  readily

-------
Figure 4.   Oil  being  spilled along a  5 m  length of perforated pipe  at
           winter  spill plot (note in the background the tank in which
           the  oil was heated  prior to the spill).
Figure 5.  Following oil flow downslope on the summer plot by visually
           inspecting wooden dowels.

-------
discerned by sight and smell, and confirmed by UV-fluorescence (Deneke et
al., 1975) when questionable.

     In July 1978, small pits were excavated at selected sites on the
two spill plots to determine the vertical distribution of the oil in the
soil profile.  Penetration of the oil was determined visually.

Thermal Characterization

     Vertical thermocouple arrays were installed with individual thermo-
couples at five levels  (See Appendix, Figures Al and A2, Table Al).

     To determine changes in the depth of thaw in the plots, probings
were conducted during the thaw periods.  Six cross sections were laid
out at 1, 3, 6, 9, 14 and 20 m downslope from the spill point in each
plot and  frequent probings were taken at one meter intervals each summer.

Oil and Oily Soil Characterization

     Initial oil samples were obtained at the time of the spills, cooled
rapidly to preserve  their integrity with respect to volatile components,
and characterized along with samples collected later by the following
techniques:

     1)   headspace  analysis for volatiles by gas chromatography;
     2)   silica  gel/alumina column chromatography to obtain major  oil
          components (alkanes, aromatics, asphaltenes, and NSO's);

     3)   characterization  of  the  alkane fractions by capillary  flame
          ionization gas  chromatography  (Apiezon L and Dexsil SCOT
          columns);
     4)   Characterization  of  all  oil  fractions by scanning  infrared
           spectroscopy.

     Soil cores were collected initially,  and  then periodically  over  a
three-year  period.   Each  sample was  taken with  a  5.7  cm diameter corer,
divided  visually  into overlying moss  (0^,  brown  organic  layer  (02  and
A )  and  greyish-brown silt  loam (C2),  and  individually  stored in pre-
washed glass canning jars.   The samples  were iced immediately and kept
 frozen until analysis.   Additional samples  were collected in July,  1978
 from small soil  pits excavated at  selected points in the contaminated
 areas.
      The soil samples were analyzed as follows.  A subsample was taken,
 placed in a scintillation vial, sealed with silicone rubber septum
 material, and equilibrated at room temperature (approximately 22°C)  for
 24 hours.  The headspace was sampled with a gas-tight syringe, and
 analyzed by gas chromatography (McAuliffe, 1971).  Gas chromatographic
 analysis was conducted as follows:

-------
     .    analytical column - 5% Durapak, Carborax 400 on Porasil C
          (9 ft x 1/8 in.)

          oven temperature - programmed from -20°C to 150°C at 10°/min.

          flow rate - 20 ml/min of helium carrier gas

          detector - flame ionization

     The remainder of the soil sample was manually extracted with
chloroform (Mallinckrodt, nanograde).  For oily soils, extractions
were continued until the color of extract was visually similar to that
from a control soil (up to 15 individual extractions).  The extracts
were combined and the chloroform removed by evaporation.  The residue,
containing material C.,. and greater, was determined gravimetrically.

     The dry weight of the soil was obtained by oven drying the extracted
soil at 105°C for at least 24 hrs.  Percent oil was calculated by divid-
ing the chloroform extractable residue by the dry weight of soil.

     The extracted oil was fractionated as follows.  The asphaltene
material was removed by precipitation with pentane and determined
gravimetrically.  The remainder of the material was fractionated by
silica gel-alumina column chromatography in a manner similar to that
described by Bailey et al., (1973).  In our study, the column was
sequentially eluted with 100 ml of pentane, 150 ml of benzene, and 100 ml
of methanol (Mallinckrodt, nanograde) with the amount of material in
each fraction determined gravimetrically.

     The alkane fraction was further characterized by gas chromato-
graphy.  Several 50 ft x 0.02 in. SCOT columns were used including
Dexsil 300 GC and Apiezon L.  Identification of individual peaks was
initially obtained by comparison to standard samples and confirmed later
by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy (HP 5992).  Ratios of pristane
(2, 6, 10, 14 tetramethylpentadecane) to n-C-7 (heptadecane) were obtained
by measuring the peak heights of these components in the Apiezon L
chromatograms.  The peak heights (and thus their ratio) are not absolute
measurements and are dependent on the degree of separation achieved for
these two components.  The higher numbers reported elsewhere for this
ratio (Jenkins et al., 1978) were obtained on a different analytical
column of the same variety.

     Infrared spectra of all the fractions, obtained by silica gel-
alumina fractionation, were determined on a PE 167 scanning IR spectro-
photometer.

     Inorganic analysis of soil was done on dried, sieved (2mm), mineral
(C2.) and organic (02, Aj) soils which had been treated with chloroform
to remove the oil.  Soil pH was obtained with a digital pH meter (glass
electrode) on a 5:1, distilled water to dry soil, suspension according

-------
                                    I I    I I     J_      I
to Jackson (1958).  Exchangeable Ca  , Mg  , Na  and K  were obtained by
further extraction of a subsample of the dried soil with IN ammonium
acetate (Jackson, 1958) and determination by atomic absorption spectro-
metry (PE 303).  Exchangeable ammonium was determined on a second soil
subsample by extraction with IN KC1 and determination by the automated
phenate method (Technicon Industrial Method #98-70W, 1973).   Soil ni-
trate was determined in the KC1 extract by the automated cadmium reduc-
tion method (Technicon Industrial Method //271-73W, 1973).  All values
for Ca++, Mg"*"1", Na+, K+, NH^ and NC>3 are reported on a dry weight soil
basis.

     Soil water samples were collected in July, 1977.  These samples
were obtained by digging small pits on each spill plot (and in a control
area), just beyond the farthest downslope point where visible oil was
detectable in the soil profile, and allowing water to collect in the
pits.  Several of these water samples were analyzed for total organic
carbon by combustion infrared analysis using a Beckman 915 Total Organic
Carbon Analyzer.  The dissolved volatile material (
-------
g/1) was used for counting heterotrophic and anaerobic bacteria.
Martin's medium  (Martin, 1950) was used for enumerating filamentous
fungi and yeasts.  A gelatin medium and the procedure described by
Rodina (1972) was use'd to count proteolytic bacteria.  A nitrate medium
and a five-tube MPN procedure (Alexander, 1965) was employed to deter-
mine the abundance of denitrifying bacteria.  Five replicate plates or
five tubes per dilution were used for microbial enumeration except for
the anaerobes which were done in triplicate.  Incubation at 20°C for one
week and 4°C for two weeks was used for all groups except the denitri-
fiers which were incubated for one month at both temperatures.  Anaero-
biosis for the determination of the abundance of anaerobic bacteria was
attained by evacuating Brewer jars, flushing with nitrogen gas contain-
ing 5% carbon dioxide, and using copper sulfate treated steel wool (Parker,
1955).

     The enumeration of oil-utilizing microorganisms was a two-step
process using a five-plate MPN procedure.  Initially, samples were
plated on a modified silica gel medium containing 1% Prudhoe Bay crude
oil.  After one month incubation (at both 4°C and 20°C), these plates
were replicated onto plate count agar to estimate the bacterial popu-
lation and onto Martin's medium to estimate the fungal populations.  The
replica plates were subsequently incubated, one week for the 20°C plates
and two weeks for the 4°C plates.  The presence of one or more colonies
on the replica plate constituted a positive test.

     Silica gel plates were prepared according to the procedure of Funk
and Krulwich (1964) with the mineral salts medium of Bushnell and Haas
(1941).  Our modification was the addition of a sufficient quantity of
colloidal silica (Cab-0-Sil MS obtained from Cabot Corp., Boston, Mass.)
to the mineral medium to make a final concentration of 1% colloidal
silica in the gel plates.  The colloidal silica was added to help main-
tain dispersion of oil in the gel plates.  In making the silica gel
plates, the components were autoclaved separately and allowed to come to
room temperature before use.  Sterilized oil (Robertson et al., 1973)
was added to the mineral-colloidal silica medium and the medium was
mechanically mixed to disperse the oil.  Then the other components were
added, the mixture shaken, and the plates poured.  Gelling occurred
within one minute, which was important in maintaining dispersion of the
oil in the plates.

     The estimation of the numbers of cellulose-utilizing microorganisms
was also done on silica gel plates using the five plate MPN procedure.
The silica gel plates for this determination contained 1% cellulose
(Sigmacell-Type 20 ) as a sole carbon source and the colloidal silica
was not added.

c.   Soil respiration measurements:

     In vitro* respiration rates of soil samples were determined by
measuring carbon dioxide evolution rates in biometer flasks (Bellco
* In the laboratory

                                   10

-------
Glass, Inc.) according to the procedure of Johnson and Curl (1972).  Five
replicate determinations were done on samples from each soil horizon in
each test plot with incubation at 4°C and 20°C.

     In situ* soil respiration was determined by measuring carbon
dioxide evolution rates in the field.  Open-ended cylinders (7.5 cm
diameter) were sunk into the test plots.  In the control plot,  the live
moss plant layer was clipped before the ten cylinders were embedded, to
ensure that only litter, root, and soil respiration were being  measured.
In the oiled plots, two sets of cylinders were embedded, one with the
killed moss layer removed (5 cylinders per plot) and one with the killed
moss layer intact (10 cylinders per plot).  Carbon dioxide evolution
rates were determined according to Coleman (1973), with the exception
that the alkali jars were suspended (from the rubber stoppers used to
cap the cylinders) instead of being placed on the soil surface.  Control
cylinders containing only jars of alkali were run simultaneously during
the 24 hour-period that respiration rates were being measured.

d.   Soil water, pH, and oil determination in soil microbiological samples:

     Water  content of soil samples was determined using the gravimetric
method described by Gardner  (1965).  The pH of fresh soil samples was
measured using a glass electrode in a 1:1 soil-distilled water sus-
pension  (Peech, 1965).

     Oil content in soil samples was determined gravimetrically on
benzene  extracts of soil.  Three replicates of approximately 15 g of wet
soil from each soil sample were dried at  105°C for 24 - 48 hr.   Each
replicate soil sample was then extracted 4 to 5 times with 50 ml por-
tions of benzene.  The extracts were combined, evaporated to dryness in
a  fume hood at room temperature, and the residue weighed.  The percent
dry residue obtained  from the unoiled soil was subtracted from the
percent  dry residue from oiled soil  to  give corrected percent oil from
oiled plots.  The weight of  the oil  contributing to  the dry weight of
soil was taken into consideration in the  calculation of the oven dry
weight of oiled soils.

e.   Statistical analyses of microbiological data:

     Counts of microorganisms and in vitro soil respiration rates are
expressed on  the basis of oven dry weight of soil.   Plate  counts, soil
respiration rates, and water  content  (untransformed  data) were statis-
tically  analyzed using analysis of variance  and Duncan's multiple range
test  (Duncan,  1955).  Confidence  limits were calculated for the MPN
counts.  For  the comparison  of two MPN  estimates, non-overlap  of  the 95%
confidence  limits was considered  indicative  of  a significant difference
between  the estimates (Cochran,  1950).
 * In place,  on site


                                    11

-------
Vegetation

     Prior to the spill, the vegetation was characterized using a
number of one meter square quadrats within both spill plots (Fig. 6).
All quadrats were sampled again in July 1978.  Data were collected
according to methods of Ohmann and Ream (1971) as previously used in the
research watershed (Troth j^t al., 1975).  Nomenclature follows Hulfen
(1968) for herbaceous species, Viereck and Little (1972) for shrub and
tree species, Crum et^ al_. (1973) for moss species, and Hale and Culberson
(1966) for lichen species.
Figure 6.  One meter square quadrat used for sampling vegetation.

     Pre- and post-spill measurements were made of percentage of cover
and frequency of occurrence of vegetation species.  The number of  stems
or individuals was also recorded for some shrub and herbaceous species.

     The site was visited during the growing seasons, biweekly during
1976 and 1977 and monthly during 1978, in order to record the time and
extent of oil related injuries.  Visual estimates of damage were made
and photographs were taken of affected quadrats.

     Samples of the current year's spruce needles from trees within and
outside the winter and summer spill areas were taken in 1975 and 1976.
These were analyzed for total nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium using
a Technicon Autoanalyzer to determine if the spills significantly  affected
nutrient content.
                                   12

-------
     Dr. Arthur Linkins, Virginia Polytechnic Institute,  took several
soil cores from both the winter and summer oil spill plots during the
1977 growing season.  These were used to evaluate ectotrophic root
respiration for species including black spruce, blueberry, and Labrador
tea.  Root respiration rates and respiratory quotients (ratio of carbon
dioxide released to oxygen absorbed) were determined in a Gilson differen-
tial respirometer using the direct KOH method.

     Dead black spruce on the plots were marked in August, 1977.  In
August, 1978 both plots were re-examined in order to determine if any
additional spruce had died.  The number of dead spruce was recorded
through 1977 and for 1978.

     Soil pits were dug within the plots during July 1978 to determine
vertical and horizontal root distribution.  Root distribution was then
compared with oil distribution.
                        RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Oil Movement

     The winter spill was conducted on 26 February, 1976.  The 57°C oil
was applied from a 5-m-wide "header with 6-mm holes spaced every 10 cm.
The oil was spilled on top of a snow pack which was approximately 45 cm
in depth.  The hot oil rapidly melted holes in the snow, with the snow
melting and collapsing one to two meters downslope of the header (Fig. 7)
Figure 7.  Snow melting near the header during hot crude oil applica-
           tion on the winter plot.


-------
The oil then moved dowtislope under the snow without disturbing the snow
surface.  Most of the movement occurred just above and within the moss
(QI) above the frozen organic (02, A^) and mineral (C^) horizons.
Although the oil was not visible from the surface, its presence beneath
the snow was obtained by probing and is plotted with respect to time in
Figure 8a.

     Movement of oil continued at a gradually decreasing rate for 24
hours following the spill before it became immobilized over an area
extending 18 m downslope of the header.  The oil remained stationary
throughout the remainder of the winter and did not remobilize until snow
melt in May, 1976.  With the onset of warm weather, portions of the oil
gradually moved an additional 17 m downslope.  The remobilized oil moved
beneath the moss layer and was visually undetectable at the surface, in
contrast to the initial winter oil movement which occurred over and
within the moss layer.  The total area affected by the oil is about
188 m^ or about 24 m^/m^ of oil, with an average oil concentration in
the impacted area of 41 H/m?.

     The summer spill was conducted on 14 July, 1976 in the same manner
as that in the winter spill.  A similar spill rate of 170 1/min was used
and the oil temperature at the header was also 57°C.  As the oil spilled
onto the surface, it rapidly penetrated to the peat (02) horizon and
moved downslope beneath the moss.  Oil disappeared from view less than a
meter downslope from the spill point and was only visible downslope in
surface depressions where pools formed.  Oil movement continued rapidly
for approximately 24 hours at which time it had moved 28 m downslope.
After 48 hours the oil had moved only an additional 6 meters.  Oil
continued to move downslope until winter freeze up in October, 1976, at
which time it had moved another 7 meters.  Oil movement plotted with
respect to time is shown in Figure 8b.
                                                          2        23
     The total area affected by the summer spill was 303 m  or 40 m /m
of oil, more than one and a half times the area affected by the winter
spill._ The average concentration of oil in the impacted area was about
25 £/m , considerably less than in the winter spill.  The areas affected
by the oil in both cases compare favorably with the range of 20 to 100
m^/m  of oil predicted by MacKay et^ ad., (1974).  However the subsurface
flow found in the summer spill differs from that observed by MacKay
^t ail., (1974) where surface flow over water saturated moss occurred.
The differences observed are likely a result of a lower moisture content
in the moss and upper soil layers of the summer spill which allowed the
oil to quickly penetrate to the organic soil where downslope flow occurred.
If the moss layer had been very wet at the time of the summer spill, it
would probably have caused the oil to float on top of the moss and flow
downslope on the surface.
                                   14

-------
         Spill
       Application
            Spill
           Application
                         149 Days
                          No Oil
                          172 Days
                         284 Days
                                                             140
                  10m
                                                                 I Om
Figure 8a.  Downslope movement of
oil following  the winter spill.
Figure 8b.   Downslope movement of
oil following  the  summer spill.
     Figures  9a and 9b are plane views of the summer and winter spills
showing the  total areas affected by  oil and the areas where oil is visibly
present on the surface.
                                     :

-------
 0   2   4   6   8   10  12   14 m
                                                 I	    lil
Figure 9a.  Summer spill showing sur-
face and subsurface oiled areas.
Figure 9b. Winter spill showing
surface and subsurface oiled areas.
                                   16

-------
                                                     2
     Only 10% of the total summer spill area of 303 m  has oil visible
on the surface.  On the other hand, 40% of the 188 m  winter spill has
visible surface oil.  The difference in visible oil on the surface
reflects the different modes of oil movement in the two spills.

     In July 1978 the vertical penetration of oil into the soil profile
was determined at several points in the two spill plots.  A diagram of
the location of oil in the soil profile at each site is shown in Figure 10.
Five locations were chosen and labeled with site coordinates across slope
and downslope (see Figures 9a and 9b for locations) as follows:

          Summer 1-2*, 8-9**   (Figure lOa)
          A site with no visible oil on the surface, near the edge of
          a visibly impacted oil area.

          Summer 4-5, 8-9   (Figure lOb)
          A location in the upper portion of the summer plot which had
          80% of the surface visibly impacted by oil.

          Summer 7, 34      (Figure lOc)

          A location near the bottom of the oiled area which was
          impacted by oil movement several days after the spill.

          Winter 8-9, 11-12   (Figure lOd)

          A site impacted from above at the time of the winter spill
          which had a heavily oil impacted surface.

          Winter 15, 34    (Figure lOe)
          This location was affected by previously immobilized oil
          which began moving through the organic layer following spring
          break-up, several months after the spill.

     The diagrams from locations downslope on the summer spill (Fig.
10 a-c) confirm that movement occurred predominantly in the organic
layer.  Upslope, in the heavily oil impacted zone, oil flowed through
the overlying moss and penetrated the mineral soil to a depth as great
as 8 cm (Fig. lOb).  Oil generally penetrated only 1 cm into the mineral
soil further downslope (Fig. lOc).  Oil movement upwards from the
organic soil into the overlying moss was also reduced downslope to
approximately 1 cm.
 * Across slope coordinate (Fig. 9a)
** Downslope coordinate (Fig. 9a)
                                   17

-------
                           (a)
                           (b)
                           (c)
                                     Summer 1—2,8-9
                                       0,  Moss
                                 62'
                                       C2 Mineral
  Permafrost

Summer  4-5, 8-9

                                 45>-
                                       Permafrost
                                                       Oil~9cm thick
                          (e)
                                                      ! Oil -10cm thick
                                      Permafrost
                                     Winter 15, 34
                                 49:
                                                      ! Oil  3-4cm thick
                                      Permafrost
Figure 10a,b,c,d,e.   Vertical  penetration of oil into  soil profile.
                                             18

-------
     Oil contamination in the first 18 cm of the winter plot occurred
from above as shown in Figure lOd.  The major portion of the oil in this
section was found in the moss layer with significant amounts in the
upper part of the organic layer.  Little oil was found in the mineral
soil in this region.

     The distribution of oil in the lower portion of the winter plot was
quite different.  This area was impacted by remobilized oil after break
up.  Oil in this region was in a narrow band about 3 cm in thickness
within the organic layer (Fig. lOe).   No oil was found in either the
moss or mineral soil in this section of the plot.

     While the average concentrations of oil in the summer and winter
plots were 41 and 24 1/m  it is clear that this oil was not uniformly
spread over the contaminated zone.  Areas such as summer 4-5, 8-9 have
much higher amounts of oil while those such as winter 15, 34 have very
little.

     It is useful to compare the physical behavior of these controlled
spills with two actual spills from the Trans Alaskan Pipeline System
(TAPS) at Valve 7 (19 July, 1977) and Steele Creek (15 February, 1978).
At Valve 7 more than 300,000 £ (80,000 gal) of crude oil were sprayed
under high pressure as far as 1200 m downwind, but the oil only saturated
the vegetation within an area 230 m from the valve (Walker et al.,
1978).  In contrast, at Steele Creek more than 1,900,000 £ (500,000 gal)
of crude oil sprayed down into the gravel workpad.  Although some minor
amounts sprayed into the air, most of the oil seems to have flowed on
or under the surface.  While some oil flowed in the upper organic layers
of the soil underneath the snow (similar to the CRREL winter spill) large
amounts also flowed over the top of the snow surface.  Evidently the
oil, which had reached a temperature of only 10°C(50°F) in the pipe,
cooled sufficiently before reaching the snow so that it could flow over
it.  The behavior of these actual spills seems to combine aspects of
both the experimental spray spills conducted by Deneke et al. (1975) and
the experimental point spill studies reported here.

Effects on Permafrost

     Very little modification to the underlying frozen ground occurred
during the actual spills.  During the winter spill, most of the heat of
the oil was dissipated by the melting of snow.  There may have been some
minor thawing of the permafrost table in the upper levels of the summer
spill plot at the time of the spill.   However, the actual thermal mass
of oil, even at 50°C, was negligible compared to the thermal mass of the
underlying permafrost.  In addition,  the oil moved downslope so rapidly
that there was little concentration or pooling of oil which could supply
enough heat to thaw the permafrost table.  Insulation, such as the soil
and peat layers above the permafrost, increases the time and the amount
of heat required to penetrate to the permafrost.
                                   19

-------
      Oil blackened surface areas have a lower albedo than non-affected
 vegetation causing the surface to warm above that of non-affected areas,
 This can result in long term increases in depth of thaw.  Figure 11
 presents the maximum thaw depths in 1977 and 1978 for cross sections
 of the two spill plots and a control area at three meters downslope.
 The greatest thaw depths in the winter and summer plot generally cor-
 respond to the surface-oil impacted areas.
Winter
 Oil-affected area
                                 Surface oil area
                                                   (Ometers
         Thaw 50-
         Depth
             100
                                                 3m.
             9/20/77
                 Summer
               0       2
             100
                 Control
               0       2
             100
Figure 11.  Cross section thaw depths in  1977  and  1978  at  3 meters
            downslope of oil application.

     Table 1 summarizes the average thaw  depths  of  the  six cross  sections
in each of the three plots at 1, 3, 6, 9,  14,  and  20 meters as well  as
the percent change in thaw depths from 1976 to 1977 and from  1977 to
1978.  The thaw depth profiles were obtained at  thermally  equivalent
times during each year at near maximum thaw depths.  On 28 September
                                   20

-------
TABLE 1 AVERAGE THAW DEPTH (CM)



WINTER
CROSS
SECTIONS



AVERAGE
THAW FOR
YEAR
SUMMER
CROSS
SECTION



AVERAGE
THAW FOR
YEAR
CONTROL
CROSS
SECTIONS



AVERAGE
THAW FOR
YEAR



1M
3
6
9
14
20



1M
3
6
9
14
20



1M
3
6
9
14
20



DEGREE DAYS
OF THAWING



1976
55.4
53.9
54.2
49.5
44.9
47.2

50.9

48.6
43.6
45.2
46.6
48.1
51.3

47.2

„
—
—
—
—
—

—

3575.



1977
73.3
67.4
67.4
56.1
53.4
52.6

61.7

58.0
57.6
52.4
54.9
54.4
55.4

55.5

62.3
61.6
52.0
52.0
54.6
55.6

57,1

3567.



1978
87.8
81.4
74.9
62.9
57.6
54.7

69.9

65.8
60.3
60.3
62.3
57.1
58.6

60.7

63.7
61.9
52.4
52.4
53.5
56.3

57.5

3576.


% Change
76-77
+32.3 %
+25.0 %
+24.4 %
+13.3 %
+18.9 %
+11.4 %



+19.3 %
+32.1 %
+15.9 %
+17.8 %
+13.1 %
+ 8.0 %



__
—
—
—
—
—






% Change
77-78
+19.8 %
+20.8 %
+11.1 %
+12.1 %
+ 7.9 %
+ 4.0 %



+13.4 %
+ 4.7 %
+15.1 %
+13.5 %
+ 5.0 %
+ 5.8 %



+ 2.2 %
+ 0.5 %
+ 1.6 %
+ 0.8 %
- 2.0 %
+ 1.3 %





Average Average
% Change % Change
76-77 77-78



21.2 % 13.2 %







17.5 % 9.4 %






— —
—
—
+ 0.7 %
—
—






-------
1976 there had been a total of 3575 degree days of thawing.  On 20
September 1977, there had been 3567 degree days of thawing.  And on
26 September 1978 there had been 3576 degree days of thawing.

     One full thaw season (1977) following the summer spill, significant
increases occurred in the average thaw depth in the winter and summer
spills as compared to 1976, 21.2% and 17.5% respectively.  Data from the
control plot is unavailable for 1976.  We assume there was little or no
change in depth of thaw from 1976 to 1977 in the control plot.  This is
based on the lack of change from 1977 to 1978 and the equivalent degree
days of thawing for 1976, 1977 and 1978.

     After the second full thaw season, additional smaller increases
in the thaw depths in the winter and summer plots occurred.  Thaw depths
in the summer plot increased by 9.4% over the previous year and in the
winter plot, with its greater surface-oiled area, by 13.2%.  Although
others have reported little increase in the active layer beneath crude
oil spills (Hutchinson and Freedman 1975; Freedman and Hutchinson
1976), measurements of the active layers in this study show an increasing
active layer several years after the initial spills.

     Two full years of this data are insufficient to predict the long
term effects of the oil on permafrost.  The thawing trend underway may
stabilize or even reverse itself, for example, if vegetation starts to
re-establish on the spill areas.  Continuation of the present trend could
result in catastrophic thermokarsting.  However, stabilization of thaw
seems most likely as long as the organic mat above the mineral soil is
not destroyed.

Compositional Changes

     The Prudhoe Bay crude oil used in the study was characterized by a
number of chemical methods in order to assess changes due to natural
weathering on slope.  These included fractionation with respect to major
classes of components by column chromatography and further characterization
of each fraction by gas chromatography and infrared spectroscopy.  Some
of the pertinent data obtained are summarized in Table 2.  A gas chroma-
togram of the original oil is shown in Figure 12.

     The major processes thought to contribute to weathering of oil
after a terrestrial spill are evaporation of volatiles, solubility and
translocation of water-soluble components, and microbiological degra-
dation.  Of these, the loss of volatiles was found to make the largest
initial impact.  Photochemical degradation, many times the controlling
factor in degradation of oil in marine spills, is negligible in terres-
trial systems where the amount of oil exposed to sunlight is small.
                                   22

-------
       TABLE 2.   INITIAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PRUDHOE BAY  CRUDE
                           OIL USED IN STUDY
       Specific Gravity
       % Sulfur
       % Volatiles (C^-Cg)

                   (c9-c15)

       Major Components of Residue  (C. ,--C/n)
               Alkanes
               Aromatics
               Asphaltenes
               Soluble NSO
               Insoluble NSO
                       0.89
                       1.0%
                          8%

                         15%
                         33%
                         30%
                         22%
                         11%
                          4%
       Pristane/n-C1 -. Ratio
       PH
       Alkane/Aromatic Ratio
                        0.65
                        7.2
                        1.12
30
Retention Time
                                       40
                                       (minutes)
Figure 12.  Gas chromatogram of  the  original oil used for the Caribou-
            Poker spills obtained  on a Dexsil Scot  column (50 ft x 0.02 in.,
            temperature programmed from 75°  to 350° at 4°C/min.).
                                    23

-------
     Samples of the original oil, oil from pools in the spill area, and
oily and control soil, were analyzed by head space gas chromatography to
characterize changes in the most volatile fraction (Cj through Cg).
Changes in  the presence of these components in the equilibrium headspace
at a given  temperature are a direct reflection of their change in  con-
centration  in the liquid  (oil) phase.  Results of these analyses are
shown in Figure 13 and Table 3.  These chromatograms, obtained for
samples collected from a  surface pool of oil on the winter spill site,
show a rapid loss of methane and ethane (Ci and C2> in the first few
hours.  Components in the C-j-Cg range (propane-octanes) declined through
the first day with reduction by a factor of four in the first two
months.  Only small amounts of these components (C3~Cg) were observable
in the five-month sample.  The retention of these low molecular weight
volatile substances for some time after spillage undoubtedly maintained
greater fluidity in the oil resulting in substantial remobilization of
the oil downslope at spring breakup.  This pool of oil on the winter
slope was sampled again and analyzed for volatiles 17 months after
spillage.  No detectable  components in the Cj - Cg range were found at
that time.  Estimates of  the percent of volatiles in the C^ - Cg range
lost with time, based on  these chromatograms, are presented in Table 3.
Two months after spillage, over 10% of this volatile material was still
present in the oil located on the surface of the soil.

     Analyses were also obtained for the oil in the soil profile from
the control and spill plots. No volatiles in the C. - CR range were ever
detected in any of the control soils.  Results from the winter spill
soils indicate a slower loss of volatiles when compared with the surface
pool of oil.  Results from this analysis for soils collected 17 months
after spillage are presented in Figure 14 and Table 3.  Significant
amounts of volatiles, in  the C,. - C_ range, were still present in the
mineral and organic soils at that time.   No detectable volatiles were
present in the surface moss after 17 months however.

     Analysis of volatiles in soil from the summer spill plot were also
obtained.  Initially the volatiles were present in much higher concen-
tration than in the winter spill since fresh oil penetrated the soil at
the time of the summer spill.  In contrast, oil in the winter spill re-
mained on the surface for several months until warmer temperatures
allowed it to penetrate into the organic and mineral  soil.  The loss
rate of volatiles in the summer spill soils, in general, was greater
than that found for the winter spill.  Thus after 12  months exposure
in the summer spill, there were lower concentrations  of volatiles (Fig.
15 and Table 3) than in the winter spill plot after 17 months (Fig. 14),
for both the organic and mineral soils.

     These results, showing substantial retention of  volatiles well
after the spill, conflict with those reported for arctic tundra soils at
Barrow, Alaska (Sexstone and Atlas,  1977).   At Barrow complete loss of
                                   24

-------
Table 3.  LOSS OF VOLATILES* FROM SPILL PLOTS.
Time after
spillage
      Percentage of volatiles* evaporated

Surface Oil  Oil in Moss   Oil in organic  Oil in mineral
                               soil            soil
Original Oil
1 Hour
1 Day
2 Months
5 Months
17 Months
Original Oil
1 Hour
2 Hour
3 Hour
4 Hour
22 Hour
2 Days
3 Days
2 Months
8-1/2 Months
12 Months
12-1/2 Months
     0%
   0.8%
  34.6%
  88.6%
  99.3%
   100%
     0%
   1.7%
  17.6%
  26.2%
  17.2%
  46.6%
  64.6%
  59.0%
                              Winter Spill Plot
     98.2%
     100%

Summer Spill Plot
               89. 2%
               99.9%
               99.9%
71.3%
96.6%
                    89.8%
                    99.1%
                    99.0%
75.2%
94.9%
               98.3%
               99.9%
* Volatiles are considered the components in the Cj - Cg range and
  account for about 8% of the oil by weights.	
the volatile fraction (
-------
    xBOO
     a. Original
    x800
     c. I Day
    x8OO
     d. 2 Months
     x80
     e. 5 Months
     x20
                                        x200
     f. 17 Months
Figure 13.  Headspace chromatograms  of  oil taken from a pool on the
            winter spill plot.   (5%  Durapak 400 on Porasil C, 9 ft x
            1/8 in., temperature programmed from -20° to 150°C at
                                    26

-------
               x20
               a. Surface Moss
               x20
               b. Organic Soil
               x20
               c. Mineral  Soil
"Figure 14.  Headspace chromatograms of oily soil from winter  spill plot,  17 months  after  spillage
            (GC conditions were identical to those given  for  Figure 13).

-------
            x20
                                                                                    '8
to
00
            a. Surface Moss
            x20
b. Organic Soil
            x20
            c. Mineral  Soil
    Figure 15.  Headspace chromatograms of oily soil from  the summer  spill plot,  12 months after
               spillage.  (GC conditions were identical to those given for Figure 13).

-------
                                                C6
Figure 16.  Headspace chromatogram of oily soil taken from the Prudhoe
            Bay spill site, 12 months after spillage.  (GC conditions
            were identical to those given for Figure 13).

     Thus it appears that volatiles are retained much longer in the soil
profile than originally believed.  Some of these volatile substances,
particularly the lower molecular weight aromatics (i.e. benzene, toluene,
xylenes), are thought to be very toxic to plants and microorganisms.
Their continued presence well after the spill may be biologically signi-
ficant.

     Runoff is undoubtedly responsible for some translocation of water-
soluble material out of the spill areas.  Attempts at measuring the
amounts of materials removed by this mechanism were unsuccessful.  Water
samples collected at locations just downslope of visible oil movement
were analyzed by a simplified stripping method developed by Leggett
(1979).  No detectable quantities (>10   g/ml) of individual components
were found in any sample.  An attempt at utilizing total organic carbon
analysis to look at the total dissolved material was also unsuccessful
due to large concentrations of organic carbon (>50 mg/X,) in the natural
soil solution of this region.

     In general, the most water-soluble components of the oil are also
the most volatile.   This was demonstrated in a study of the aqueous
solubility of Prudhoe Bay crude oil (MacKay and Shiu, 1976).   A decrease
in solubility from over 29 mg/1 for fresh oil to less than 0.06 mg/1 for
oil in which the volatiles had been removed by evaporation was found.
The loss rate of equally volatile substances, which differ widely in
solubility, can be used to qualitatively assess the importance of this
mechanism relative to volatilization.   Losses of two very soluble com-
ponents of the oil, benzene and toluene, were found to be similar to the
                                   29

-------
losses of alkanes of equal volatility but much lower solubility.  Thus,
at least for the lower molecular weight oil fraction, the contribution
of solubility to loss rate is less significant than volatilization.

     Results obtained from silica gel-alumina chromatography (to be
presented later) indicate that compositional changes of relatively
water-soluble material versus highly insoluble material in the oil
extracted from soil samples are insignificant.  These results are con-
sistent with information reported by Raymond j^t a^. (1976) in a study in
a more temperate climate where no loss of material was observed via
runoff or leaching  in oiled field plots.  They also agree with results
obtained for spills directly onto fresh water (Phillips and Groseva,
1977) and salt water (McAuliffe, 1977) where evaporation was shown to be
the predominant process for short-term changes in oil composition after
spills.

     Several types of microorganisms, including bacteria, actinomycetes,
yeasts, and fungi have been shown to be capable of degrading many of the
organic components of crude oils (Davis, 1967).  The total amount of oil
present on the site at one time cannot be directly measured without
destroying the site.  Hence, it is impossible to determine the change
due to microbial activity in the amount of oil present.  Laboratory
studies, however, have shown preferential decomposition of certain
fractions of the oil.  Bailey jit al.  (1973) and Katov ejt al. (1971) have
shown that the alkane fraction  (saturates) decompose more rapidly than
other components.  Shorter chain n-alkanes (straight chains) were found
to decompose fastest of all.  Isoprenoid alkanes (branched chained
species), such as pristane, have been shown to be more resistant to
microbiological degradation (Jobson et al., 1972).

     Aromatic components tend to degrade at the next fastest rate to the
alkane fraction with degradation of asphaltene and NSO material being
very slow.  An increase in asphaltene material as a by-product of decom-
position of more degradable material has even been reported  (Bailey et
al., 1973).  Assessment of the  extent of microbial degradation is thus
possible, in principle, by analysis of oil compositional changes with
time.

     The method chosen to investigate these changes was fractionation
using silica gel-alumina column chromatography.  This procedure sub-
divides the residue obtained by chloroform extraction of the oily soils
into its major organic components:  alkanes, aromatics, asphaltenes and
NSOs.  The ratio of alkane to aromatic material was  chosen as an indi-
cator of compositional change with time.  These ratios obtained from oil
extracts from the soil from July, 1976 through June,  1978 are presented
in Table 4.  The Prudhoe Bay oil used for the spill has an initial  1.12
alkane/aromatic ratio.
                                    30

-------
             TABLE  4.  ALKANE/AROMATIC  AND  PRISTANE/n-C.., RATIOS*
             FOR  TOPPED**  SOIL  EXTRACTS (CARIBOU-POKER CREEK AREA SPILLS)
Sampling
Date
Winter Mineral Soil
(c2)
Winter Organic Soil
(0^)
Winter Moss

7/15/76
9/17/76
3/29/77
4/5/77
7/13/77
8/1/77 ***
1/5/78
6/27/78***
a
1.03
1.29
—
1.08
1.04
1.17
—
1.11
b
0.59
0.56
—
0.58
0.53
0.50
—
0.54
                                     a
                                    .10
                                    .27
                                    .05
                                    .29
                                   1.17
                                   1.09
                                   0.98
0.58
0.53

0.55
0.56

0.55
  a
 ,22
 .23
 .25
 .28
1.01
                                                          0.84
  b
0.57
0.61
0.58
0.62
0.67

0.71
            Summer Mineral Soil   Summer Organic Soil
              Summer Moss


7/15/76
9/17/76
3/29/77
4/5/77
7/13/77
8/1/77***
1/5/78
6/27/78***
(C
a
1.12
1.05
—
0.98
—
0.77
—
1.10
a Alkane/aromatic
b Pristane/n-C, 7
2>
b
0.61
0.56
—
0.54
—
0.68
—
0.71
ratio
ratio
(02A1)
a
1.12
1.05
1.36
1.00
1.04
1.14
0.87
0.96
(The measured
(The precision
b
0.59
0.64
0.56
0.55
0.51
0.60
0.60
0.58
precision of
a
1.03
1.12
0.99
—
1.02
—
0.94
"
this ratio
of this determination is
b
0.59
0.58
0.56
—
0.63
—
0.76
"
is +0.03).
estimated
     to be +0.03)7
*    Original topped Prudhoe Bay oil had ratios of 1.12 for alkane/aromatic and
     0.65 for Pristane/n-C.. ?.
**   Topped extracts are those in which the volatile fraction (^jr) ^as been
     removed by evaporation.
***  These samples were collected as described in the soil microbiological
     methodology.  All others were collected as described in the oily soil
     characterization section.
                                    31

-------
     A second method based upon gas chromatographic analysis of the
alkane fraction was developed to follow the ratio of pristane, an iso-
prenoid alkane, to n-C^j.  Since these species have similar volatility
and very low solubility, a change in their ratio should be indicative of
microbiological degradation.  The results of these analyses are also
presented in Table 4.  Initially Prudhoe oil had a 0.65 pristane/n-C17
ratio.

     The results from both of these determinations indicate very little
or no compositional change with time through the first two years with
respect to these parameters.  The only possible exception could be the
oil in the summer mineral soil, where some increase in pristane/n-Cjy
ratio was observed in the 8/1/77 and 6/27/78 samples.  Samples taken
July 1978 (to be discussed later, see Table 6) do not confirm this trend.
Oil in the moss may also show some small change.  Additional sampling in
the next several years will be required to confirm that observable
compositional change due to microbial activity is occurring.

     If these parameters are accepted as a measure of the effect of
microbial activity, little compositional change due to microbial activity
can be inferred thus far.  If, however, microbial degradation is occur-
ring in a more non-specific fashion relative to the various oil compo-
nents, these parameters might not be useful to discriminate this type of
natural weathering.  Some recent evidence does suggest that degradation
in field conditions can be less preferential (Raymond ^t a^., 1976;
Horowitz and Atlas, 1977) than has been observed in laboratory studies.

     In order to assess if these parameters are useful in detecting
changes due to microbial activity, several other oil spill plots in
Alaska, some dating back to 1970, were sampled and analyzed in a manner
similar to the Caribou-Poker spills.  Chromatograms for oil from some of
these spills, as well as from initial Prudhoe crude, are shown in Figure
17.  The results of these analyses are shown in Table 5.

     The results from the 1970 Barrow spills show considerable changes
in the pristane/n-C.7 ratios with the value for the plot 313 showing
nearly a tenfold increase to 5.1.  The other Barrow spills are also
elevated above that found in the Caribou-Poker spills.  The chromatograms
from which these values were obtained for Barrow plots 313 and 311 are
presented in Figure 17.  The chromatograms for Barrow plot 313, in
particular, show a drastic change from original Prudhoe Crude Oil, with
the normal alkanes being much reduced relative to branched chain material.
The alkane/aromatic ratio shows much less change relative to the values
typically found in the Caribou-Poker spills.  Barrow sample 313 did show
a decrease in alkane/aromatic ratio to about 0.84 from values generally
greater than 1.0 for the Caribou-Poker sites.  These results indicate
that the pristane/n-Cjj ratio may be a useful tool to assess the effect
of microbial activity on the oil composition in the soil.  The alkane/
aromatic ratio was found to be much less diagnostic.
                                   32

-------
SAMPLE  (Spill
        Date)
 TABLE 5.  ALKANE/AROMATIC AND PRISTANE/n-C17
  RATIOS FOR SAMPLES FROM OTHER ALASKAN SPILLS

Sample Date     Alkane/Aromatic  Pristane/n-Cj-
                    Ratio           Ratio
Prudhoe Oil used
   For Prudhoe
   Spill (July
          1976)

Prudhoe 2CR (1976)

Prudhoe SCR (1976)

Caribou-Poker
Winter Spill
(Feb. 1976)

Caribou-Poker
Summer Spill
(July 1976)
                    0.96
                 0.64
   July 1977

   July 1977

   1976-1978



   1976-1978
1.06             0.55

0.97             0.56

(see Table 4)  (see Table 4)



(see Table 4)  (see Table 3)
                                 Oil in Soil
Barrow 313 (1970)
Barrow 311 (1970)
Barrow 152D(1971)
Fox (1971)
July 1977
July 1977
July 1977
July 1976
0.84
1.00
0.96
0.92
5.1
0.80
0.81
0.63
4.4%
-
13.3%
249%
       7.7%

      11.6%

   Moss  137-267%
Organic  7.3-190%
Mineral  3.0-9.8%

   Moss   69-207%
Organic    9-311%
Mineral  1.5-3.4%
           Soil samples were also obtained from the Fox spill site.  This site
      is quite similar to the Caribou-Poker area, and is located on a subarctic
      permafrost location.  The amount of oil present in the soil at Fox is
      very high relative to the Barrow site and again similar to the Caribou-
      Poker area.  A chromatogram of the alkane fraction of the oil from this
      site is given in Figure 17.  Even after five years, there appears to be
      no evidence of significant microbial decay at this location (Table 5).

           The oil extracted from soil at the Prudhoe Bay spills also shows
      little compositional change relative to the original oil after one year
      (Fig. 17 and Table 5).  The percent oil in the soil at this site is
      similar to the Barrow spill areas and much lower than found in Fox or
      Caribou-Poker.  This lower amount should make a small change in compo-
      sition due to microbial activity much more observable in the future.
                                         33

-------
Figure 17.  Chromatograms of oil extracted from soil taken from several
  Alaskan oil spill sites (Apiezon L SCOT column, 50 ft x 0.02 in.,
  temperature programmed from 175° to 250° at 4°/min.).

     The analyses reported thus far for the Caribou-Poker spills were
taken in the upper, heavily impacted areas of both plots.  Additional
samples were collected in July 1978 to determine the vertical distribu-
tion of oil at various downslope locations in both plots (Fig. lOa-f)
and to assess if different amounts of weathering were occurring at
other locations.

     The amount of oil in the various soil horizons of the winter and
summer spill plots was found to vary drastically from location to loca-
tion (Table 6).  In general, the moss and upper organic soil has the
greatest amount of oil in the upslope portion of the winter spill plot
with amounts in the moss varying from 137% to 267% of the dry weight of
the soil.  Amounts of oil in the organic and mineral soil of the winter
plot vary from 7.3% to 190% and 3.0% to 9.8%, respectively.
                                   34

-------
TABLE 6.  ANALYSES OF SAMPLES COLLECTED IN JULY 1978
SAMPLES
S 4-5, 8-9
S 1-2, 8-9
S 7, 34
S 4-5, 8-9
S 7, 34
S 1-2, 8-9
S 1-2, 8-9
S 8-9, 8-9
W 8-9, 11-12
W 8-9, 11-12
W 7, 34
W 8-9, 11-12
S ORGANIC
S MINERAL
W ORGANIC
W MINERAL

(MOSS)
(MOSS)
(MOSS)
(ORGANIC)
(ORGANIC)
(ORGANIC)
(MIN)
(MIN)
(MOSS)
(ORGANIC)
(ORGANIC)
(MIN)
June 1978
11 ii
ii ii
ii M
% Oil Pris/n-C17
183.0 0.71
43.1 0.54
135.0 0.67
311.0 0.56
131.0 0.54
57.9
2.4
22.0
246.0 0.61
91.3 0.54
30.8

21.1 0.58
1.76 0.71
16.8 0.55
3.89 0.54
% Alkanes
31.8
-
31.9
36.8
32.0
32.9
22.1
30.0
32.4
33.0
30.6
33.5
30.9
26.6
33.0
31.0
Alk/Arom
0.77
-
0.94
1.05
0.81
0.97
0.89
0.96
0.93
0.94
1.01
0.98
0.96
1.1
0.98
1.06
                             35

-------
     In the upper portion of the summer spill area, the largest amount
of oil is in the organic soil and lower moss.  Amounts of oil in the
moss vary from 69% to 207% and in the organic layer vary from 9% to 311%
The mineral soil, on the other hand, contained much less oil varying
from 1.5% to 3.4%.

     In the lower sections of both spill plots, the location of oil in
the profile is considerably different.  In the winter plot, the oil
resided in a narrow band within the organic soil with an oil content in
this region of about 30% (Fig. 12).   In the lower portion of the summer
plot, the oil was present throughout the organic layer with small amounts
present in the lower moss and upper mineral layers as well.  The moss
and organic soil contained in excess of 100% of oil in this region.

     Analysis of the residual oil extracted from soil samples collected
in July 1978 at various locations in the two spill plots showed little
difference in composition (Table 5).  Thus there does not seem to be a
drastic difference in the amount of microbial or other types of natural
weathering in various areas within the plots.

Microbiological Responses

     A preliminary examination of the data suggests that the microbial
populations and their activities showed similar response trends at
both incubation temperatures of 4°C and 20°C (20°C incubation results are
presented in appendix C).  Also, respiratory activity and some microbial
populations were stimulated to a greater extent at 4°C than at 20° C.
Thus only the 4°C data is presented here since 4°C more closely approxi-
mates the soil temperature in the research watershed areas where our
test plots are located (Appendix Table A-l).  The dilution plate count
method and MPN enumeration procedures were used in this study.  Despite
their limitations these methods are sensitive to differences in microbial
counts among the test plots or within a plot over a period of time.
Relative changes in numbers of microorganisms are more important than
absolute numbers.

     The effect of oil application on heterotrophic bacterial counts is
shown in Tables 7, 8 and 9.  In 1976, beginning immediately after the
spill in the winter plot, the numbers of heterotrophic bacteria were
increased relative to the control plot, and the increased counts per-
sisted into September.  In the summer plot, after an initial depression
of the heterotrophic bacterial counts, there was a continual increase in
numbers with the highest counts occurring in September.  These increased
bacterial counts in the oiled plots persisted through 1977 (Table 8)
and 1978 (Table 9).  The increases in bacterial numbers in both oiled
plots were significant relative to the control plot indicating a stimu-
latory effect of the spill on the heterotrophic bacterial population, the
extent of stimulation being greater in the summer.  Our findings on the
response of heterotrophic bacterial populations to oil agree with those
of Sexstone and Atlas (1977) and Loynachan (1978).
                                   36

-------
     TABLE 7.   1976 HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIAL COUNTS (x 10 /g soil)
                    IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS
Sampling
  time
Control
 plot
Winter
 plot
Summer
 plot
                              AI Horizon
February
June
Julyb
August
September

o
February
June
Julyb
August
September
2.8
6.8
3.9
2.4
0.7

1.2
2.2
0.9
1.4
0.3
5.4**
120**
430**
170**
210**
C« Horizon
1.8*
2.1
41**
14**
12**
-
-
2.8*cc
340**cc
640**cc

-
-
0.6**cc
25**cc
210**cc
  a Within 24 hours after winter oil spill.
  b Within 24 hours after summer oil spill.
  * Significantly different from the control at  5% level.
 ** Significantly different from the control at  1% level.
 cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
     TABLE 8.  1977 HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIAL COUNTS  (x  10  /g soil)
                 IN OILED AND UNOILED  (CONTROL) PLOTS.
Sampling
time

June
July
Aueus t
Control
plot

7.7
1.9
1.0
Winter
plot
A, Horizon
540**
240**
99**
Summer
plot

1400**cc
900**cc
460**cc
 June
 July
 August
         C9 Horizon

1.1             36**
0.3             63**
0.4             40**
              210**cc
              110**cc
               77**cc
 **  Significantly  different from the control at 1% level.
 cc  Significantly  different from the winter at 1% level.
                                    37

-------
     TABLE 9.  1978 HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIAL COUNTS (x 10 /g soil)
                 IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS.
Sampling                   Control       Winter       Summer
  time                      plot          plot         plot

                                        A. Horizon

June                        2.9           220**         480**cc
July                        1.6           190**         150**c

June
July

0.8
0.4
C~ Horizon
58**
42**

43**cc
21**cc
** Significantly different from the control at 1% level.
 c Significantly different from the winter at 5% level.
cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.


     Numbers of filamentous fungal propagules (Table 10) were reduced in
both soil horizons immediately following the winter spill and remained
so throughout  the growing season.  The immediate impact of the summer
spill was to reduce fungal counts in the A^ horizon, but by September,
fungal counts  were five  times higher than in the control.  In the C^
horizon  there  was an overall increase in counts with an apparent re-
duction  occurring in August.  However, in 1977  (Table  11) and 1978
(Table 12), fungal propagules were significantly reduced in both soil
horizons of the oiled plots.  The extent of oil inhibition on the
filamentous fungal population was greater in the winter plot than in  the
summer plot.   The inhibitory effect of oil spills on fungal populations
(investigated  by the dilution plate method) were similarly observed by
other workers  (Miller et al., 1978; Antibus and Linkins, 1978), who used
direct counting techniques  to estimate the fungal populations.  Warcup
(1967) suggested that the dilution plate method may not necessarily
correlate with fungal biomass or activity.    However, according to
Griffiths  and  Siddiqi (1961) and Montegut  (1960), the  dilution plate
counts can be  used as an indication of the fungal populations and their
activities.

      In  1976,  yeast  counts  in both oiled plots were significantly in-
creased  above  their  initial levels and relative  to  those in the  control
plot (Table 13).  These  increases  in  counts  relative  to  the control
persisted  in 1977  (Table 14) and  1978  (Table  15).   Numbers in  the summer
plot were  consistently higher  than  those  in  the winter plot during  the
three consecutive growing  seasons  after  the  oil spills.  The  significant
 increases  suggest an enhancement  of  the yeast  population resulting  from
the oil  applications.  A similar  response was  noted by Scarborough  and
Flanagan (1973)  and  Campbell et al  (1973).
                                    38

-------
  TABLE 10.  1976 FILAMENTOUS FUNGAL PROPAGULE COUNTS (x 104/g soil)
                IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS
Sampling
time

f\
February
June
Julyb
Augus t
September
Control
plot

130
120
120
34
24
Winter
plot
A, Horizon
92*
14**
18**
23**
10**
Summer
plot

-
-
49**c
31*
100**cc

February
June
Julyb
August
September

19
24
13
14
5
C« Horizon
4**
0.7**
8**
4**
2**

-
-
17**cc
5**
7*cc
   a Within  24 hours  after winter  oil  spill.
   b Within  24 hours  after summer  oil  spill.
   * Significantly  different  from  the  control at 5% level.
  ** Significantly  different  from  the  control at 1% level.
   c Significantly  different  from  the  winter  at  5%  level.
  cc Significantly  different  from  the  winter  at  1%  level.


  TABLE 11.   1977 FILAMENTOUS FUNGAL PROPAGULE COUNTS (x 10  /g  soil)
                 IN OILED AND UNOILED  (CONTROL)  PLOTS
Sampling
time

June
July
Augus t

June
July
Augus t
Control
plot

110
64
60

30
4.8
11
Winter
plot
A Horizon
27**
13**
1.4**
C7 Horizon
2.1**
1.3**
0.6**
Summer
plot

43**
34**cc
18**cc

15**cc
5. Ice
5.4**cc
 * Significantly different from the control at 5% level.
** Significantly different from the control at 1% level.
cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
                                   39

-------
  TABLE 12.   1978 FILAMENTOUS  FUNGAL  PROPAGULE COUNTS  (x 10  /g soil)
                 IN OILED AND  UNOILED (CONTROL)  PLOTS
Sampling
time
June
July

June
July
Control
plot
78
62

12
19
Winter
plot
A. Horizon
19**
18**
C_ Horizon
5.6**
6.7**
Summer
plot
56**cc
43**cc

7.4**cc
12 **cc
** Significantly different from the control at 1% level.
cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
       TABLE 13.  1976 YEAST COUNTS* (x 10 /g soil)  IN OILED AND
                       UNOILED (CONTROL)  PLOTS
Sampling
time

•a
February
June,
Jul?
August
September

^ , a
February
June,
July*
August
September
Control
plot

1.9
3.4
1.3
0.9
1.1

0.9
0.8
0.5
0.4
0.2
Winter
plot
A. Horizon
4.7**
320 **
31 **
44 **
12 **
C_ Horizon
1.0
2.9**
5.0**
7.4**
3.3**
Summer
plot

-
-
3.1**cc
640 **cc
650 **cc

-
-
0.7cc
64 **cc
290 **cc
   a Within 24 hours after winter oil spill.
   b Within 24 hours after summer oil spill.
  ** Significantly different from the control at 1% level.
  cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
                                   40

-------
              TABLE  14.   1977 YEAST  COUNTS  (x  10  /g  soil)
                 IN  OILED AND UNOILED  (CONTROL) PLOTS
Sampling
time

June
July
August

June
July
August
Control
plot

2.0
3.2
3.2

.19
.16
.20
Winter
plot
A. Horizon
32 **
14 **
6.3**
C.., Horizon
1.3**
2.7**
1.3**
Summer
plot

140
64
54

23
3.
3.

**cc
**cc
** cc

**cc
6**cc
6**cc
** Significantly different from the control at 1% level.
cc significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
              TABLE 15.  1978 YEAST COUNTS  (x 10 /g soil)
                 IN OILED AND UNOILED  (CONTROL) PLOTS
Sampling
  time
Control
 plot
  Winter
   plot
Summer
 plot
June
July
June
July
  2.4
  3.3
  0.8
  0.6
A. Horizon

   38**
   23**
   Horizon

   10**
   11**
  300**cc
   95**cc
   18**cc
   24**cc
** Significantly different from the control at 1% level.
cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
     The response of proteolytic bacteria was monitored only during
1976.   In both oiled plots, there were significant increases in counts
above their initial levels and relative to the control (Table 16).   This
indicates a general stimulation of the proteolytic bacterial population
due to the oil applications, with the extent of stimulation being  signifi-
cantly greater in the summer plot compared to the winter plot.
                                   41

-------
     TABLE  16.  1976 COUNTS  (x 105/g soil) OF PROTEOLYTIC BACTERIA
                IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS
Sampling
time

o
February
June
Julyb
August
September

Q
February
June
Julyb
August
September
Control
plot

1.9
1.7
1.0
0.9
1.0

0.6
0.4
0.7
0.2
0.2
Winter
plot
AI Horizon
2.6
3.1**
100 **
57 **
95 **
C_ Horizon
0.6
6.3
23 **
5.1**
5.3**
Summer
plot

-
-
1.1 cc
1000 **cc
1100

-
-
0.2**cc
110 **cc
370 **cc
   a Within 24 hours after winter  oil spill.
   b Within 24 hours after summer  oil spill.
  ** Significantly different from  the control at 1% level.
  cc Significantly different from  the winter  at 1% level.


     The effect of the oil spills  on anaerobic bacterial counts were
followed only in the months of July and September in 1976.   In the
winter plot, significant increases in counts  relative to the control
plot occurred during both months;  in the summer plot, significant
increases occurred in September (Table 17).   These results  indicate an
enhancement of anaerobic bacterial growth during the first  growing
season after the spills.  Loynachan (1978)  reported similar findings on
the effect of oil on anaerobic bacteria.

     The denitrifying bacterial population consistently showed signifi-
cant increases in both winter and  summer plots relative to  the control
plot (Figs. 18, 19 and 20).  The significant increases in the denitrifying
bacterial numbers in the oiled plots suggest an increase in denitrifica-
tion potential and indicate a stimulatory effect of oil.  This is in
agreement with findings of Lindholm and Norrell (1973).  However, the
stimulatory effect of oil on the denitrifying bacterial population
seems to diminish with time.  A decrease in population levels in both
oiled plots is apparent in 1978 relative to 1977 or 1976 levels, with
1977 counts being lower than 1976  counts.
                                   42

-------
     TABLE  17.   1976 COUNTS  (x  105/g  soil) OF ANAEROBIC BACTERIA
                 IN OILED AND UNOILED  (CONTROL) PLOTS.
Sampling
time

Julya
September

Julya
September
Control
plot

5.1
3.0

2.0
2.0
Winter
plot
A. Horizon
54 *
36 **
C Horizon
7.7 **
4.5 **
Summer
plot

3.6cc
42 **

1.6cc
10 **cc
  a Within 24 hours after summer oil spill.
  * Significantly different from the control at the 5% level.
 ** Significantly different from the control at the 1% level.
 cc Significantly different from the winter at the 1% level.


     Microbial populations capable of utilizing cellulose as  a sole
carbon source were monitored only in 1976.  Cellulose-utilizing bacte-
rial numbers (Figure 21) increased in the winter plot relative to the
control.  In the summer plot, this population was initially unaffected,
but by September significant increases in counts over the control occurred,
On the other hand, numbers of cellulose-utilizing fungi (Figure 22) re-
mained comparable to the control in both oiled plots.  The significant
increase in cellulose-utilizing bacteria suggests stimulatory effects of
oil on this population.

     In 1976 oil-utilizing yeasts and bacteria (Figures 23 and 24
respectively) in the winter plot were significantly increased relative
to the control.  In the summer plot, counts of these oil-utilizing
populations were initially comparable to  the control but by September
increases had occurred.  The significant  increases in the oil-utilizing
bacterial population in both oiled plots  continued through 1978  (Figure
25).  However for  the  oil-utilizing yeasts, significant increases rela-
tive to the control persisted through 1978 only in the AL horizon of
the summer plot  (Figure  26).  In the C  horizon of both oiled plots,
counts of this yeast population were significantly higher than the con-
trol only in  1978.
                                   43

-------
IO7
IO6
CO
o»
i io5
0>
O
u.
0>
| IO4
3
Z
IO3
4r)
m*m^^m
^*
•^»
•»
__
•M
••»
••
^M»
f^m^^m^
(••»
MIM»
M^
M^i^
IM^
^^^••^^
IM
!•••
••
••»
^^
r —
^~
- o
- o
V
«•
••
•



•t
••
•



A, Horizon
*
P
«
••



>
••
»





r

«




^







»
••
•








C



0
o
V





2 Horizon
m
M





•
O
? r



••
••i
•j

••
»•
Mi
L»






••



— 2
— z
— =
— ^
—
cws cws cws cws
Jul Sep Jul Sep
Figure 18.
1976
MPN counts of denitrifying bacteria in oiled and
unoiled
(control)  plots.  C = Control Plot; W = Winter Plot;  S =
Summer Plot;  Brackets represent 95% confidence intervals.
                       44

-------
                      Horizon
    !06r-
    io5
(0


"QJ

O
 Q)
A

 E

 3
   IO4
    IO3
            o
            o
    IO2
r
o
o
                                   Horizon
o
o
o
o
           C WS

             Jun
 CWS

  Jui
CWS

 Aug
CWS

 Jun
CWS

 Jul
CW S

 Aug
      Figure 19.  1977 MPN counts of denitrifying bacteria in oiled and unoiled

                (control) plots.  C = Control Plot; W = Winter Plot; S =

                Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95% confidence intervals.
                                     45

-------
    I06
     I05
    I04
o
T5
_o
 E
 D
    I03
    I02
     10'
                  AI  Horizon
                          Horizon
              C w  S
               Jun
C  W S
  Jul
C  W S
  Jun
C  W S
  Jul
        Figure 20.  1978 MPN counts of denitrifying bacteria in oiled and unoiled
                  (control) plots.  C = Control Plot; W = Winter Plot; S =
                  Summer Plot;  Brackets represent 95% confidence intervals.
                                     46

-------
IU
I08
"5
(fl
(0
"5
o
«*-
o
W. 1 /~\ O

-------
   I07
:= 10
O
O
Q.
O
 -  10'
 0)
    10
    10
                A, Horizon
   C2Horizon
      C WS
        Jul
Figure 22.
                          C W S
                            Sep
C  WS
  Jul
C  W S
 Sep
                1976 MPN counts of cellulose-utilizing filamentous fungi in
                oiled and unoiled (control) plots.  C = Control Plot; W =
                Winter Plot; S = Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95% con-
                fidence intervals.
                                  48

-------
o
0)
 0)
o
 0)

 E
io8
I07
IO6
10 5
IO4
in3
•MMM^
•M
B
MM*
M»
m^B
^^^•••M
^Ml
•»
••>
MM»
•»
IM^M
^^•^•B
^^M
— 	
	
^
••i

A


»
•i

^^
*•


Horizon
M

••
»








— «







•


•
«•

^
•••



•1



mm^
•







C2Hor



^
r



•»
•^
^
MB
*M1


•1
••
•


«•
•M
N


•
••I




ft


*™1


zon —.


•


•i
•


•
mm


•^
«1


	 	
••
»


— =
	 —
— —
^
              C  WS
               Jut
C
  Sep
Jul
Sep
        Figure 23.  1976 MPN counts of oil-utilizing bacteria in oiled and unoiled
                   (control) plots.  C = Control Plot; W = Winter Plot;  S =
                   Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95% confidence intervals.
                                        49

-------
      8
   I07
 o
CO
 O
O
   I0
 E
 13
   I0
              A| Horizon   -r
  C2 Horizon
                                       r"
C  W S
 Jul
                         C  W S
                           Sep
C  W S
  Jul
c  ws
  Sep
        Figure 24.  1976 MPN counts of oil-utilizing yeasts in oiled and unoiled
                 (control) plots.  C = Control Plot; W = Winter Plot; S =
                 Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95% confidence intervals.
                                  50

-------
    I08
    107
    I06
O
«4-
o

o>  I05
.Q
E
3
    I04
    I03
—  A,
El  Horizon
                             Horizon  —
            cws
            1977
          CWS
          1978
                            CWS
                            1977
CWS
 1978
   Figure 25.
1977 and 1978 MPN counts of oil-utilizing bacteria in oiled
and unoiled  (control) plots. C = Control Plot; W = Winter
Plot; S = Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95% confidence
intervals.
                               51

-------
    10'
    I07
    I06
o
**-
 o
 o>   I05
.a
 e
         r    Ai   Horizon
    !04
    10
                    Horizon   -i
             C WS
              1977
C WS
 1978
C WS
 1977
CWS
 1978
     Figure 26.  1977 and 1978 MPN counts of oil-utilizing yeasts in oiled
              and unoiled (control) plots; C = Control Plot; W = Winter
              Plot; S = Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95% confidence
              intervals.
                                52

-------
     In 1976, counts of the oil-utilizing fungal populations in both
oiled plots showed no significant change relative to the control (Fig-
ure 27).   This trend continued through 1977 (Figure 28).  In 1978 in-
creases relative to the control plot occurred in both horizons in the
summer plot and in the C2 horizon of the winter plot.  However, the
increases may not be significant because of the unexplained decrease
in control plot (Dunts in 1978 relative to the preceeding years.

     The effect of oil on in vitro soil respiration rate during 1976 is
shown in Table 18.  An immediate depression of soil respiration rates
was apparent one day after the spill in both horizons of the winter plot
and in the C- horizon of the summer plot.  However, by the end of the
growing season, the overall effect of oil on soil respiration rates was
one of enhancement.  The higher respiration rate in the A.  horizon of
the control plot in February relative to the other months is not too
surprising in view of the evidence presented by Greenwood (1968) that
freezing and thawing of soil results in increased organic matter decom-
position.

     The enhancing effect of oil on soil respiration observed in 1976
continued into 1977 (Table 19) .  This effect is greater in the A-^
horizon of the summer plot than in the winter plot, paralleling the
enhancing effect on microbial populations.

     The effect of oil spills on soil respiration in situ is shown in
Table 19 and Figure 29.  In 1976 and 1977, soil respiration rates were
not significantly affected by the addition of oil in cylinders with the
killed moss layer removed.  However, in cylinders with the killed moss
layer intact, respiration rates were significantly increased.  These
results suggest that the enhancing effect of oil on soil respiration
in situ may be due to an increase in available substrate from plants
killed as a result of the oil spill.  It is interesting to note that the
in situ respiration rates were higher in the summer plot relative to the
winter plot in 1976 while the reverse was true in 1977.  In 1976 (Table
20), respiration rates within a set of cylinders in the test plots had
standard errors ranging from 0.31 to 1.81.  This high variation may be
due to a methodology artifact or more likely due to the heterogeneity of
the soil within each plot.  Because of the suspected heterogeneity in
the test plots, 1977 in situ respiration measurements were pooled (Figure
29).

     The soil pH of the site is generally 4.8 to 5.6.  The addition of
oil did not appear to cause a significant change in soil pH (Appendix,
Table C-7.  The soil water content in control plot and in both spill
plots 5 m downslope from the point of oil application in 1976 through
1978 is presented in Tables 21 and 22.  These measurements show distinct
differences in water content among the three test plots.  During 1977
and 1978 water content in both spill plots was less than the control
except for one sample date.  Furthermore, the water content in the winter
plot was consistently lower relative to both the control and the summer
plots.

                                   53

-------
   107F
         i:    A,  Horizon
   10
o
/>
o»
§J05
o
ex
o

-------
    I07
    I06
o
(f)

o>
     I05
 Q)
 O
 a
 o
CL  |04
 a>
X)

 E
    10
    I02
         r    AI  Horizon
                               Horizon  -i
            C ws

             1977
            cws
            1978
CWS    CWS

 1977     1978
  Figure 28.
1977 and 1978 MPN counts of oil-utilizing filamentous fungi

in oiled and unoiled (control) plots.  C = Control Plot;

W = Winter Plot; S = Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95%

confidence intervals.
                             55

-------
      8
 CVJ
CM
 E   4
  CM
 o
 o
      0
                           Without   Dead
                             Moss Layer
                            With  Dead
                           Moss  Layer
             Control    Winter    Summer
    Figure 29.  Respiration in situ in oiled and unoiled (control) plots in
              1977. Histograms with dissimilar letters are significantly
              different at 1% level.  (Respiration rates are means of
              three consecutive weekly determinations within each set of
              cylinders.)
                                56

-------
TABLE 18.  1976 IN VITRO SOIL RESPIRATION RATES (mg C02/24 hr/100 g soil)
                 IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS.
Sampling
time

«a
February
Julyb
Augus t
September
Control
plot

27.2
8.0
8.6
3.8
Winter
plot
A1 Horizon
11.2**
16.6**
15.6**
15.6**
Summer
plot

20.2**
30.6**cc
37.8**cc
                                             Horizon
0
February
Julyb
Augus t
September
2.6
3.6
3.8
2.4
n. d.
6.0**
7.8**
5.6**
-
1.2**cc
6.2**
13.6**cc
  a Within 24 hours after winter oil spill.
  b Within 24 hours after summer oil spill.
n.d.Not detectable by method used.
  * Significantly different from the control at the 5% level.
 ** Significantly different from the control at the 1% level.
  c Significantly different" from the winter at the 5% level.
 cc Significantly different from the winter at the 1% level.
TABLE 19.
           1977 and 1978 IN VITRO SOIL RESPIRATION RATES (mg C02/24  hr/100  g
             soil)  IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL)  PLOTS.
Sampling
time
1977
June
July
August

June
July
August
1978
July
July
Control
plot

21.5
14.4
14.6

5.7
4.7
4.6

19.7
6.6
Winter
plot
A, Horizon
32.3**
17.1*
16.7
C~ Horizon
12.2**
9.5**
7.6**
A, Horizon
24.1*
10.3*
Summer
plot

79.9**cc
35.1**cc
41.5**cc

25.6**cc
8.5**
6.6*

31.4**cc
11.4**
 * Significantly different from
** Significantly different from
cc Significantly different from
                                 the  control at 5% level.
                                 the  control at 1% level.
                                 the  winter at 1% level.
                                    57

-------
    TABLE 20.  1976 IN SITU SOIL RESPIRATION (g CO /24 hr/m ) IN
                  OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS.
Date
Control plot
Winter Plot
Summer plot

June 10
July 16
August 3
August 12
September 1
a
4.7
3.7
4.8
2.2
2.9
b
_
-
4.6
3.3
1.6
c
7.0
5.1
5.8
4.8*
4.0
b
_
-
5.7
2.7
4.5
c
_
5.7
8.6*
5.7**
6.4
  a Respiration cylinders embedded after removal of live moss layer.
  b Respiration cylinders embedded after removal of dead moss layer.
  c Respiration cylinders embedded without removal of dead moss layer.
  * Significantly different from control at 5% level.
 ** Significantly different from control at 1% level.
        TABLE 21.  1976 SOIL WATER CONTENT (%) IN OILED AND
                       UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS.
Sampling
time

o
February
June,
Jill?
August
September
Control
plot

295
214
155
113
95
Winter
plot
AI Horizon
154*
119*
122**
96
81**
Summer
plot

-
171* cc
162**cc
153**cc

a
February
June
Julyb
August
September

56
114
71
62
55
C9 Horizon
70
56**
71
63
50

—
_
99**cc
53**cc
83**cc
   a Within 24 hours after winter oil spill.
   b Within 24 hours after summer oil spill.
   * Significantly different from control at 5% level.
  ** Significantly different from control at 1% level.
  cc Significantly different from winter at 1% level.
                                   58

-------
           TABLE 22.  1977 and 1978 SOIL WATER CONTENT (%)
                       IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS.
Sampling
time
1977
June
July
Augus t

Control plot

243
168
194

Winter plot
AI Horizon
102 **
77 **
74 **
C« Horizon
Summer plot

177
137
137


** cc
* cc
** cc

June
July
August
1978
June
July

June
July
92
62
60

159
146

64
58
62 **
48 **
46 **
AI Horizon
97 **
86 **
C? Horizon
59 **
55
105 ** cc
58 * cc
55 ** cc

190 ** cc
113 ** cc

70 ** cc
51 **
 * Significantly different from the control at 5% level.
** Significantly different from the control at 1% level.
cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
     The concentrations of benzene-extractable oil in the oiled soil
samples are presented in Table 23.  It is apparent that the oil con-
centrations in the AI horizon were higher than those in the C2.  The
vertical migration of oil through the soil horizon with time is evident,
the distribution of oil in the soil layers of the winter plot being
different from the summer.

     Although the concentration of oil was greater in the Aj_ layer, the
impact of oil was not limited to  this horizon.  Both AI and C2 layers
showed significant increases in microbial populations and respiratory
activity, and in the case of the  filamentous fungal population, signifi-
cant reductions immediately following and up to the third growing
                                    59

-------
     TABLE 23.  OIL CONTENT  (%) IN SOIL 5 M DOWNSLOPE FROM
                       POINT OF OIL APPLICATION
Sampling
 time
Winter plot
Summer plot
1976
             Horizon
February
June,
July15
August
September
    8.0
   17.9
    8.8
    4.3
    5.1
   12.2
    6.3
    6.5
                                          Horizon
February
June.
Jul?
August
September
    0.2
    0.1
    1.5
    1.0
    1.4
    1.3
    0.2
    0.9
1977
          A.. Horizon
June
July
August
   12.5
    4.7
    4.5
   25.0
    9.2
    6.8
                                       C_ Horizon
June
July
August
2.2
2.9
1.6
3.3
0.8
0.8
1978

June
July
    9.3
    9.0
          A. Horizon
   10.7
    8.0
                                           Horizon
June
July
    2.1
    1.4
    0.9
    0.3
a Within 24 hours after winter oil spill.
b Within 24 hours after summer oil spill.
                                   60

-------
season after the oil spills.  However, the response in the C^ layer was
sometimes slower to appear.  In comparing the enhancing effect of oil in
the two horizons, its extent was generally greater in the A. than in the
C2 layer.

     The relationship of respiration rates to microbial counts and the
relationship of oil concentrations to microbial counts and respiration
rates were also examined.  Significant linear correlations were found
between in vitro soil respiration rates and numbers of heterotrophic
bacteria or filamentous fungi (Appendix, Tables C-8, C-9, C-10, and
C-ll).  Similarly, in the oiled plots, significant linear correlations
were found between concentrations of oil and in vitro soil respiration
rates or microbial numbers (Appendix, Tables C-14 to C-21).

     The data indicate that the soil microbial populations showed a
rapid and differing response during the first year after the oil spills.
Immediately after the summer spill the initial depression in numbers of
heterotrophic bacteria and filamentous fungal propagules, and in res-
piratory activity appear to be due to toxicity of volatiles present in
the crude oil.  At the time of the spill in July, concentrations of
volatiles in the summer plot exceeded those in the winter plot.  How-
ever, loss of volatiles in the spilled oil was faster in the summer plot
than in the winter plot.  By the second growing season, greater con-
centrations of volatiles are present in the soil in the winter than in
the summer plot.

     At the end of the first growing season in the summer plot, counts
of filamentous fungi and heterotrophic bacteria, and soil respiratory
activity significantly exceeded initial summer and control levels.  In
the winter plot, numbers of filamentous fungal propagules were reduced
immediately after the spill and remained depressed throughout the
initial plant growing season, although bacterial counts and soil respira-
tion rates were significantly higher than in the control by the end of
the first season.  During the second and third growing seasons, signifi-
cant reductions in filamentous fungal propagules were evident not only
in the winter plot but also in the summer plot while significant in-
creases in counts of heterotrophic bacteria and yeasts occurred.

     It is apparent that filamentous fungi are more sensitive to the
presence of oil and in fact were adversely affected by the oil spills.
The extent of inhibition by the oil was greater in the winter plot than
in the summer plot.  The effect of oil on this microbial population could
be due to direct toxicity of the oil components or may be related to the
aeration status in the oiled plots.  Significant amounts of volatiles,
particularly the C5-Cs fractions, were found up to the second growing
season in the organic and mineral soil layers of both oiled plots.  Con-
centrations were higher in the winter plot.  Other workers (Teh and Lee,
1973, 1974) have shown that mycelial growth and spore germination of some
                                   61

-------
fungi are inhibited by n-hexane, n-heptane and n-octane which are compo-
nents of the volatile fraction of oil.  Also, filamentous fungi as a
group are strict aerobes (with a few exceptions).  When oxygen diffusion
becomes inadequate to meet the microbial demand for aerobic metabolism, the
fungi are first to suffer (Alexander, 1977).  The significant increases
in numbers of anaerobic and denitrifying bacteria in the oiled plots
suggest the possibility of decreased oxygen availability in the oiled
plots.  The differences in the mode of flow, concentration, and physical
properties of the spilled oil in the winter and summer plots may ac-
count for differences in aeration status.

     Because of oil damage on higher and lower plants shown by other
studies (Hunt ^t al., 1973; McCown et al^., 1973; Miller et^ al. , 1978;
Antibus and Linkins, 1978), the input of plant residues into the soil
system in oil perturbed areas may be considerable.  In this study,
during the first year of the spills, damage to vegetation was similarly
observed, the damage being more rapid and extensive in the summer plot
(in the heavily oil impacted areas).  This coincides with our finding of
greater increases in microbial populations and soil respiration  rates
in the summer plot compared to the winter plot.  This suggests that the
increase in levels of soil microbial populations and activity may be
due not only to the presence of petroleum substrate but also to the
presence of substrates released from dying or dead plants.  It can be
postulated that readily available carbon substrates are released rapidly
by the solvent action of oil on plant cell membranes.  The burst of
microbial growth and respiratory activity observed shortly after the oil
spills may have been triggered by the sudden release of readily utiliz-
able carbon substrates from plants in addition to those present in the oil.
A lag time may occur before oil is utilized because of the time needed for
development of microbial populations capable of degrading oil and because
of the adaptive nature of hydrocarbon enzymes (Zobell, 1950; Van der
Linden and Thijsse, 1965).  However we did not determine this in our study.
We did observe significant increases in oil-utilizing bacteria and yeasts
two months after the summer spill and five months after the winter spill.
Increases in these populations may have occurred sooner but earlier enu-
merations were only done 24 hours after the summer spill.

     Soil respiration rates measured in the test plots give an index of
organic matter decomposition under field conditions.  The data on in
situ respiration showed an enhancement of soil respiratory activity
in the presence of oil and plants killed by the oil but no effect on
respiration when killed plant material was removed.  This suggests that
the enhancing effect of oil on 1976 and 1977 soil respiration in situ
is indirect, that increased respiration may be due to increased decompo-
sition of carbon substrate released when vegetation was damaged by the
oil spills.
                                   62

-------
     This study has shown that growth of some microbial populations has
not been adversly affected.  For the most part, growth has been increased
by the oil applications.  This suggests that nutrient transformations
carried out by these populations may be stimulated.  However, the actual
activity of these functional groups is determined by a balance of the
physiological requirements of the microorganisms and the existing
environmental conditions.  It is interesting to note that in soil samples
collected from the treatment plots, microbial counts correlated signifi-
cantly with metabolic activity, i.e. soil respiratory activity.

     Future studies are required to determine the effects of spilled oil
on different microbial processes in the carbon and nitrogen cycles, such
as nitrogen-fixation, denitrification, nitrification and ammonification,
and cellulose degradation.

     The soil microbial populations showed a differential response
through the third growing season after the hot oil spills.  Although the
effects ranged from inhibition to stimulation, stimulation of growth of
the indigenous soil microorganisms and their activities seems to pre-
dominate.  Effects of oil appear to be both direct and indirect but
mechanisms involved need further study.  Additional information is
necessary to determine whether microbial populations continue to sustain
their levels as oil damaged plant substrates are depleted, and whether
they may then utilize oil as the main substrate.  With the vast amount
of carbon present in crude oil, it is inevitable that nutrient limita-
tions will occur.  Consideration must be given to type and timing of
nutrient additions and to other means of enhancing natural recovery
processes such as improving aeration.

Oil Effects on Vegetation

     Following application of the oil, vegetation damage was assessed
visually via changes in leaf color and leaf fall.  There were three main
time frames for injuries:  1) immediate; 2) occurring during the initial
growing season; and 3) cumulative, occurring after the initial growing
season.  Toxicity probably caused immediate injuries while delayed
injuries may either be due to indirect (physical) effects or to a combi-
nation of toxic and indirect effects.

     Virtually all above ground foliage that came into contact with the
oil was quickly killed.  Turbidity was immediately reduced and foliage
appeared dead within several days.  In the winter spill the foliage was
dead when it was first observed in mid-May after snowmelt.  Evergreens
such as cranberry retained the damaged foliage longer than deciduous
species such as birch.  The zone of contact was generally limited to the
immediate areas below the  5-m wide oil feeder and to areas of low relief
in the path of aboveground flowing oil (Figure 9b).  Lichens and mosses,
which tend to be concentrated in low  areas and have a low-growth form,
                                   63

-------
suffered particularly heavy mortality.  In contrast, cottongrass tussocks
with a raised, upright growth form and species growing on areas of
higher relief kept most of their aboveground biomass above the oil.
These species continued to grow and flower, at least initially, despite
their being surrounded by oil (Figure 30).

Figure 30.
Cottongrass tussocks growing despite being surrounded by
surface oil and dead moss and lichens.
     Since oil flowed into depressions and low areas, aboveground vege-
tation on higher relief was not in physical contact with the oil.
Belowground contact was difficult to accurately ascertain since the
nature of the study would not permit large-scale destructive sampling of
roots and soil.

     However, the soil pits dug in August, 1978 provided some evidence
of species differences in rooting habits and the extent of belowground
oil contact (Figure 31).  Very few (less than 10%) roots extended into
the mineral soil (C_) and these were all observed to be less than 1 mm
in diameter.  Some species (Vaccinium uligonosum, Rubus chamaemorus,
Picea mariana) had roots which were concentrated in the Oj and upper 02
soil horizon but extended into both the Aj and C2 horizons.  Since the
oil in most cases flowed within the 02 horizon it contacted roots of
most species to at least some extent.

     In contrast to the other species observed on the site, cottongrass
tussock roots have primarily a vertical orientation instead of the more
commonly observed horizontal growth.  Eriophorum vaginatum produces new

-------
Figure 31.  Soil pit for determining rooting habits and belowground oil
            movement.   (Note dark band of oil just above light colored
            mineral soil.)

roots annually which grow down following the receding frozen soil layers
as the growing season progresses (Chapin et al., 1979).  In a soil pit
34 m downslope on the summer spill plot, cottongrass roots that appeared
vigorous and white had  grown into the G£ horizon after penetrating 9 cm
of oil soaked soil, mainly within the 0_ horizon (Figure 32).  Thus
cottongrass, by both its aboveground tussock growth form and its below
ground vertical rooting strategy minimizes the amount of biomass which
is in contact with oil.  This undoubtedly helps to account for the low
mortality of cottongrass in the contaminated areas.

     Damage during the  first growing season varied with such factors as
species, position on slope, growth form, and season of spill.  In gen-
eral, delayed injuries  first appeared on foliage that was above the path
                                     '

-------

Figure 32.  Cottongrass (Eriophorum vaginaturn) roots growing through
            oil soaked soil.

of the oil and near the top of the plot.  Injuries subsequently appeared
farther downslope and in areas of subsurface flow immediately adjacent
to surface oil.  Deciduous leaves turned brown and abscised prior to
evergreen leaves.  For example, in the summer spill, resin birch foliage
turned brown 5 m downslope two weeks after the spill, but did not turn
brown at 10 m until four weeks after the spill.  In contrast, Labrador
tea and cranberry leaves had only turned partially  brown 10 m downslope
at the end of the growing season (six weeks).  Black spruce had some of
the most delayed damage of any species.  Although spruce in the upper
2 m of the winter spill began dropping needles by mid-June, the needles
had not entirely dropped until September.  On the summer spill the
needles turned brown on several spruce and many had chlorotic foliage by
September.  Most needles remained on the trees at that time.
                                   66

-------
     The nutrient analysis of black spruce foliage indicated a signi-
ficant decrease from 1975 to 1976 in the total nitrogen content of the
new foliage of trees exposed to oil (Table 24).  Total phosphorus and
total potassium did not show consistent changes.  Although there  was
significant year-to-year variability in total nitrogen, the magnitude of
the nitrogen decrease on the oiled plots was great enough to be statis-
tically significant at the 5% level when compared with either the con-
trol plot during the same year or with the same plot from the previous
year when it was unoiled.  The decrease in nitrogen content may be due
to:  1) disruption of the metabolism of root nutrient uptake; 2) coating
of the roots by a hydrophobic layer of oil which physically interferred
with nitrogen uptake; 3) immobilization of nitrogen by increased micro-
bial growth, in response to addition of readily utilizable carbon sub-
strates, or 4) some combination of these effects.

          TABLE 24.  NUTRIENT CONTENT OF BLACK SPRUCE FOLIAGE.


                             Avg/Std.Error       Avg/Std.Error    Avg/Std.Error
Year         Treatment            %N*                 %P*	   	*£	
 1975         Control         0.91 (.03) a        0.07  (.01)  a    0.56  (.04) a

 (unoiled)    Summer          0.90 (.02) a        0.08  (.01)  a    0.54  (.01) a
             winter          0.94 (.03) a        0.09  (.00)  a    0.57  (.01) a

 1976         Control          1-05 (.04) a        0.11  (.00)  a    0.35  (.00) a

 (oiled)      Summer           0.75 (.06) b        0.10  (.01)  a    0.32  (.01) b
             Winter           0.86 (.02) b         0.10  (.00)  a    0.37  (.00) a

 * Figures with a common letter are not significantly different at the 5%
   level using  the t-test.   Comparisons are made within years and within
   columns.


      Cumulative injuries were largely limited to evergreen species.
 During the second growing season increasing amounts of black spruce
 foliage became chlorotic, turned brown, and abscised.   Similarly, foil
 age of cranberry and Labrador tea continued to turn red and then brown
 throughout the second growing season so that some injuries were apparent
 as far downslope as 25 m on the winter spill and 35 m on the summer
 spill.  Cumulative injuries could be due to a combination of direct oil-
 caused stress and problems of overwintering.  This mechanism has also
 been suggested by other studies  (McCown et al., 1973; Linkins and Anti-
 bus, 1978).
                                     67

-------
     The number and distribution of the killed black spruce trees and
saplings due  to the oil is shown in Table 25.  The total number of black
spruce trees  killed over three growing seasons is similar on both spills,
but mortality was more delayed on the winter spill.
                      TABLE 25.  MORTALITY OF BLACK SPRUCE

                       Thru 1977                     1978
                  Max.         Total          Max.         Total      3 Year
               Distance        Trees       Distance       Trees       Total
              Downslope (m)   Killed      Downslope      Killed     Mortality
Summer            10            26            10            2            28
 Spill

Winter             9            ?0            20           10            30
 Spill
     The roots of the black spruce are concentrated in the Oj and 02
horizons and extend further away from the stem than do the roots of most
smaller species.  Therefore the black spruce are not as likely as other
species to have their entire root systems surrounded by oil but are
more likely to have some roots in contact with the oil.  The very slow
mortality of the black spruce may be due in part to chronic toxicity or
physical stresses on a portion of the root systems that continues to
increase for three or more years (Freedman and Hutchinson, 1976; Hutchinson
and Freedman, 1978).

     Table 26 presents a comparison of vegetation data from the perma-
nent quadrats before and after the winter and summer spills.  Quadrats
were grouped into 3 categories:  1) areas impacted by surface flows of
oil, 2) areas impacted by subsurface oil flows, and 3) controls - un-
disturbed areas.  Surface flow areas showed the most severe effects in
both spill plots.  Live ground cover was most reduced on the upper 5 m
of the winter spill but was also reduced on most of the surface oiled
summer spill.

     It is difficult to accurately compare the summer and winter spill
quadrats because the oil flowed off to the side of the winter plot.
Only three permanant quadrats on the winter spill were impacted in
comparison to twelve on the summer spill.  However, damage was more
severe in both spill plots on areas of surface flow where the oil could
contact both above and belowground plant parts.  There were 76.3 m^ of
surface flow on the winter spill in comparison to 30.3 m^ on the summer
spill.  This would imply that the real extent of severe vegetation
injury (as defined by a decrease in total live ground cover) was greater
on the winter spill.  Stem counts of shrub species readily indicated
                                   68

-------
                                     TABLE 26.  PRE (1975 & 1976) AND POST-SPILL  (1978)
                                                VEGETATION ANALYSIS (AVE. CHANGE)
                                Control
Winter Spill
Summer Spill
VO
Species or Category
Oiled ground-cover*
Frequency of occurrence
Trees
Picea mariana (trees) -cover
number of individuals
occurrence
(saplings) cover
number of individual
occurrence
Medium and low shrubs
Betula glandulosa-cover
number of stems
occurrence
Ledum groenlandicum-cover
number of stems
occurrence
Ledum decumb ens- cover
number of stems
occurrence
Vaccinium uligonosum-cover
number of stems
occurrence
Vaccinium vitis-idaea
L.- cover
occurrence
Dwarf shrubs and herbs
Rubus chamaemorus L. -cover
number of leaves
occurrence
Equisetum sylvaticum
L.- cover
occurrence
£3
Surface flow Subsurface flow Surface flow Subsurface flow
0
0,0

0
0
43,43
-33
0
43,43

0
-.6
100, 100
-4
-24
71, 71
0
-14
86, 86
-2.9
-5.3
100, 100
-43

100, 100

0
+ .25
57, 57
-10

71, 57
+80
0,100

-50
-2
100,0
-40
-4
100,0

-20
-4
50, 0
-25
-82
100,0
-
-
0,0
-30
-35.5
100, 0
-25

100, 50

-10
-3.5
100, 50
-10

100, 0
0
0,0

-10
-
0,0
-
-
0,0

0
0
100, 100
+10
-5
100, 100
-10
-4
100, 0
-20
-105
100, 100
0

100, 100

0
-5
100, 100
-10

100, 0
+43
0,100

-10
-15
33, 17
-15
-1
33, 17

-15
-7.5
100, 67
-5.6
-25.7
100, 83
-4
-17.6
83, 67
-5.6
-39.3
100, 83
-10

100, 100

-8.3
-15.8
100, 33
-10

50, 0
0
0,0

-5
-1
33, 17
0
-.5
33, 33

+23
-3.7
100, 200
+2
-6.4
83, 83
+1.7
-17.2
100, 100
0
-13.7
100, 100
+3.3

100, 100

+5
-6.2
100, 83
-10

33, 0

-------
TABLE 26.  (Cont'd)
                          Control
Winter Spill
Summer Spill
Species or Category
Petasites hyperboreus
Rydb. -cover
number of leaves
occurrence
Eriophorum vagina turn
-cover
occurrence
Graminae: cover
occurrence
Mosses
Total: cover
occurrence
Pleurozium schreberi
(Brid) Matt-cover
occurrence
Polytrichum spp-cover
occurrence
Dicranum spp-cover
occurrence
Sphagnum spp-cover
occurrence
Lichen
Total: Cover
occurrence
Cladonia spp-cover
occurrence
Cetraria spp-cover
occurrence
Pel tig era spp-cover
occurrence
Total live ground cover

+3.3
+ .67
14, 28
-5.7

100, 100
+14
0, 14

-1.7
100, 100
-8.6

100, 100
-1.4
100, 71
-4.3
86.71
+5
57, 57

-12.9
100,
-8.7
100,
+ 1.4
100,
-10
100,
0
Surface flow
-10
-.15
100, 0
-15

100, 50
-
0,0

-60
100, 50
-35

100, 50
-20
100, 0
-20
100, 0
-
0,0

-35,
100, 50
-30
100, 50
-20
100, 50
-20
100, 0
-60
Subsurface flow
-20
-3
100, 0
0

100, 100
-
0,0

+10
100, 100
+10

100, 100
-10
100, 0
+10
100, 100
-
0,0

0
100, 100
0
100, 100
+10
100, 100
-10
100, 0
0
Surface flow Subsurface flow
_
0,0
0

100, 83
+1.4
0, 14

-8.3
100, 100
-10

100, 100
-4
83, 60
-5
67, 50
-6.7
100, 100

+ 1.7
100, 100
+ 1.7
100, 100
-5
100, 67
+6
50, 100
-16.7
—
0,0
0

100, 100
-
0,0

+10
100, 100
+5

100, 100
-3.3
50, 100
+1.7
100, 100
+10
83, 83

+6.7
100, 100
+5
100, 100
-4
83, 50
-2
83, 83
-3.3
* Ave. change in % vegetation cover
  Pre-spill followed by post-spill frequency
a:l quadrat only

-------
injury within surface flows.  Blueberry was especially susceptible
(Table 26).  This could be explained by its very shallow rooting habit.
Resin birch and both species of Labrador tea were also readily injured.
Mosses and lichens were completely killed in quadrats with 80% of oiled
ground cover, but were only reduced in areas of less extensive surface
flow.  Damage was most severe in the upper 10 m of the spills.  Within
this area surface flows generally covered a greater percentage of the
ground and the penetration of the oil into the soil was greater (Figures
10 a-e).

     Areas of subsurface flow had much less damage.  Live ground cover
was not reduced.  Mosses and lichens appeared healthy but shrubs and
black spruce were sometimes affected.  Blueberry and cloudberry were
reduced in number of live stems while some black spruce trees and shrubs
were killed.

     In summary, damage appeared more rapidly on the summer spill.  This
could have been due to the more rapid flow downslope or the oil remain-
ing hotter for a longer period.  Both of these factors could increase the
rate of uptake of toxic components by plant roots.  In addition, actively
growing vegetation was subjected to greater contact with volatiles on the
summer spill since the vegetation was dormant at the time of the winter
spill.  Many of the volatile components were lost prior to the start of
the first growing season following the spill on the winter plot (Figure
13 and Table 3).  On both plots deciduous species showed a more rapid
browning of foliage, with resin birch being the most susceptible.
Blueberry and cloudberry were more delayed.  Evergreen species continued
to exhibit new injury symptoms throughout the second growing season.
Foliage of Labrador tea and cranberry was still alive in the second
season in areas where all deciduous foliage was dead.  Primarily during
the second growing season, some foliage of species outside the areas of
surface flows turned brown and abscised.

     An important characteristic of both spills is that no regrowth has
been seen on any species which lost its foliage as a result of oil
damage.  This result is in direct contrast to other reported studies
(Hutchinson and Freedman, 1975 and 1978; Wein and Bliss, 1973) and
probably is the result of root damage as pointed out by McCown et al.
(1973).

     No regrowth or invasion by new individuals has occurred within
areas of surface flow.  Observations of an earlier (1971) CRUEL crude
oil spill at Fox, Alaska, showed a similar situation except that feather
mosses had begun to encroach upon part of the surface flow area after
six growing seasons.  However, the Fox site was considerably wetter
than the Poker Creek site.
                                    71

-------
     The two large actual spills along TAPS did show more regrowth.  The
valve 7 spill, which was primarily a spray spill, showed extensive
recovery of both sedge and shrub species one year after the original
spill.  The subarctic Steele Creek spill site was bladed by a bulldozer,
while the ground was frozen, and was subsequently burned twice, in May
and June, 1978.  Portions of the spill were later tilled and/or fertilized
but were not seeded.  By September, 1978 sedges and bluejoint reedgrass
(Calamagrostis canadensis) were regrowing in some areas of the spill (Figure
33).  At both of these sites soil moisture was much higher than in the
CKREL spill site.  Therefore, the oil would not have penetrated so
deeply into the soil so that regrowth could occur from belowground
vegetative parts.
Figure 33.  Steele Creek oil spill along the trans-Alaska Pipeline
            System.   (Note regrowth of bluejoint reedgrass in the
            foreground.)

     Others have reported that intensive point spills are less damaging
than dispersed spray  spills (Hutchinson and Freedman, 1978).   However,
the valve 7 spray spill showed good recovery probably because of low
concentrations of oil per unit area.
                                   72

-------
     Root respiration was reduced at all oiled sites, with the summer
spill showing the greatest decrease (65%; Table 27).  Studies on respir-
ation quotients (RQ), although limited, suggest that these RQ values
were raised by exposure to the crude oil in this study in contrast to
arctic studies which showed decreased RQ's (Linkins and Antibus, 1978).


     TABLE 27.  RESPIRATION OF ECTOTROPHIC MYCORRHIZAL FEEDER ROOTS.
                DATA FOR 02 AND C02 GIVEN AS THE MEAN OF THREE EX-
                PERIMENTS IN y GAS/HR G DRY WT RQ = RESPIRATORY QUO-
                TIENT (FROM A.E. LINKINS, VPI)

                    Control
               02                     219
               C02                    155
               RQ                     0.71

                    Summer (6 m downslope)
               0                      77 (65% decrease)

               C02                    63
               RQ                     0.81

                    Summer '(21 m downslope)
               0                      163  (26% decrease)

               co2                    in
               RQ                     0.68

                    Winter (6 m downslope)
               0                      152  (31% decrease)

               C02                    154
               RQ                      1.02


      The  results of  the vegetation  study are  consistent with  the physical
and  chemical  changes  of  the  oil as  well as  the microbial responses.  The
two  mechanisms hypothesized  for oil induced vegetation damage are direct
toxicity  and  indirect physical disruption  of  plant  functions  by the  oil.
Distance  downslope  reduces both toxicity,  since  the most toxic  compo-
nents are volatiles  which are rapidly  lost, as well as physical dis-
ruption,  since oil  concentrations are  reduced.   Surface flows increase
both toxic and physical  effects since  they lead  to  contact of oil of
both above and below ground  plant parts.  However  the relative impor-
tance of  these two  factors  is not known.
                                    73

-------
     Subsurface flows will make contact with roots of different species
to varying extents because of differences in rooting habits.   In addi-
tion, species may vary in their tolerances to contact with crude oil.
There may be critical levels of oil concentrations below which plant
species are undamaged.  Both species'  rooting habits and tolerances can
influence differential susceptibility to accidental spills.

     The more rapid vegetation damage on the summer spill may be due in
part to a high initial concentration of volatiles.  However the winter
spill had higher levels of toxic components during the second and third
growing seasons.  Viscous, tarry oil on surface oiled areas of the
winter spill reduced infiltration and may have decreased soil moisture.
These factors may be responsible for the delayed mortality of the black
spruce on the winter spill.  By the end of the third growing season, the
winter spill with its 250% greater area of surface flow may have more
total vegetation damage than the summer spill because of these differences.

     Both the nature of injury and the lack of vegetative recovery have
important implications for restoration following oil spills.  The lack
of reinvasion by seedlings may be due to the hydrophobic surface of the
oil-soaked moss layer (Deneke ^t a.1. , 1975; McGill, 1977).  However,
even if the hydrophobic surface were disrupted to allow for germination
as suggested by McGill (1977) the problem of toxic components of oil
within the soil might persist for a number of years.  In addition,
restorative measures which disrupt the surface organic mat on a permafrost
site pose a threat to the thermal stability of the area.
                              Conclusions

     The response of a subarctic permafrost community to a massive intro-
duction of crude oil is represented in Figure 34.

     Crude petroleum spilled onto subarctic permafrost slopes penetrates
the moss layer.  During periods of thaw  the oil moves into and saturates
lower  organic  layers of the soil.  The oil then spreads downslope and
largely follows drainage  channels; this  spread is  concealed by the moss
cover.  Thus the area actually contaminated is always larger  (2.5 to
10 times) than the  area where oil is readily visible on the surface.
Topography will have a significant effect upon the amount of  land con-
taminated.

     In winter, snow cover reduces the initial extent of areal spread,
but such cover also provides additional  concealment as warm oil  can
penetrate the  snow  and move along and into the underlying moss and organic
soil layers.
                                    74

-------
                                      Oil spilled on
                                    subarctic perma-
                                       frost slope
       Albedo
      changes
        \
                    Saturation and'
S                    penetration of
                   urface moss layer
  T
Volatilization
  Increase in active
     layer depth
                    Partial loss of
                   contaminant from
                     community
                                 Foliar contact
                 Summer or
              following snowmelt
Saturation of
 specific soil
organic layers
                     \
                                        Crude oil
                                      degradation
                                                     Death of foliage
                                      Movement
                                       excess oil
                                       downslope
                                 Root contact/
                                stress, and death
                Initial depression
               of microorganism
                   activities
                                                  Plant damage
                                                   and death
                                                      *
                                                   Release of
                                                   substrates
                                                      Stimulation of
                                                      some groups of
                                                      microorganisms
Figure 34.   Flowchart  representing the  observed effects  of a massive
              crude oil  spill on a  subarctic permafrost site.  These
              responses  have  been observed during the first three growing
              seasons  after  the oil spill.  Dashed  lines  indicate reac-
              tions that have not been  confirmed.
                                           75

-------
     Oil introduction into this ecosystem represents a strong perturba-
tion.  Major changes in microorganism populations are evident.  Foliage
immediately in contact with the contaminant is killed and slow death can
occur to plants that have roots exposed to the moving underground oil
mass.  Some species appear resistant to the effects of crude oil in the
soil.

     Crude oil contaminated areas in subarctic regions may not be stabil-
ized even several growing seasons after the spill.  Death of plants,
microbial changes, oil compositional changes, and increases in the active
layer may continue for an undetermined time period.

     Although volatiles in crude oil near the soil surface are lost
rapidly after a spill, in the lower soil horizons some of even the
most volatile components of the crude can remain for some time.  No
evidence for the rapid biological degradation of the oil has been
obtained.  In addition, no evidence of recovery by seedling establishment
on oil contaminated surfaces has been observed during the first three
growing seasons after the spill.

     It appears that a. crude oil contaminanation will be damaging,
although not catastrophic to a subarctic community for many decades.

                            Recommendations

     Based on the results obtained in this three year study, the fol-
lowing recommendations are made:

1)  Consideration should be given to a "no clean-up strategy" for small
spills in subarctic permafrost areas (a few thousand gallons or less),
where no surface water course is involved and ready access is not avail-
able.  Providing access to a site can be more destructive of sensitive
permafrost areas than the spilled oil.  In any case, the size of the
spill should be considered since very large spills could have much greater
impact.  Also the type of spill and product spilled will have varying
effects, however, these were not a consideration  in this study.

2)  Reaction to large summer oil spills needs to be rapid to minimize
the area impacted in the incident since the oil will continue to move
downslope for weeks following spillage.  Reaction  to winter spills can
be delayed since the oil will initially impact a much smaller area and
downslope flow will quickly stop as the oil cools.  Clean-up operations
should be completed before snow melt when the oil may remobilize and
impact additional unaffected areas.

3)  Research at the present site needs to be continued in order to
determine long-term changes.  The uniqueness of the site in terms of
background information and size of the spills should be fully utilized
for future studies.
                                   76

-------
4)  Long term changes in chemical composition of the oil and the rate of
encroachment by native species of vegetation onto oil saturated areas
need to be determined.

5)  The environmental factor(s) limiting oil degradation (e.g. tempera-
ture, moisture, nutrient availability, aeration, etc.) needs to be
documented in order to devise appropriate restorative measures and to
assess the importance of such environmental factors for natural recovery.
For example, soil moisture data in this study indicate reduced moisture
in heavily oil contaminated soil but aeration has not been measured.
                                   77

-------
                             LITERATURE CITED
Alexander, M. 1965.  Denitrifying bacteria.  In: Black, C. A. (ed.).
     Methods of soil Analysis. Part 2.  Chemical and Microbiological
     Properties.  Wisconsin:  American Society of Agronomy, pp. 1484-
     1486.

Alexander, M. 1977.  Introduction to soil microbiology.  2nd ed.
     New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Antibus, R.K. and A.E. Linkins. 1978.  Ectomycorrlizal fungi of Salix
     rotundifolia Trantv. I.  Impact of surface applied Prudhoe crude
     oil on mycorrhizal structure and composition.  Arctic, 31:366-386.

Arctic (1978) 31(3)

Atlas, R.M. 1977.  Stimulated petroleum biodegradation.  CRC Critical
     Reviews in Microbiology. 6, (3): 371-386.

Bailey, N.J.L., A.M. Jobson and M.A. Rogers, 1973.  Bacterial degradation
     of crude oil:  Comparison of field and experimental data.  Chemical
     Geology.  11:203-211.

Bushnell, L.D. and H.F. Haas.  1941.  The utilization of certain hydro-
     carbons by microorganisms.  Journal of bacteriology.  41: 653-673.

Campbell, W.B., R.W. Harris and R.E. Benoit, 1973.  Response of Alaskan
     tundra microflora to crude oil spill.  Proceedings, Symposium on
     the Impact of Oil Resource Development on Northern Plant Communities.
     Fairbanks, Alaska: University of Alaska Institute of Arctic Biology:
     Occasional Publications on Northern Life No. 1).  pp.53-61.

Chapin, F.S. Ill, K.VanCleve, and M.C. Chapin, 1979, Enhanced soil temper-
     ature and nutrie t cycling in the tussock growth form Eriophorum
     vaginaturn, J. Ecol. 67: 169-189, 1979.

Cochran, W.G. 1950.  Estimates of bacterial densities by means of the
     "most probable number".  Biometrics 6: 105-116.

Coleman, D.C. 1973. Soil carbon balance in a successional grassland.
     Oikos 24: 195-199.

Cook, F.D. and W.S. Westlake. 1974. Microbiological degradation of
     northern crude oils.  Environmental-Social Committee.  Northern
     Pipelines.  Task Force on Northern Oil Development. Report No.  74-
     1.  Information Canada, Cat.  No. R72-12774.  Vancouver, B.C.,
     Canada.

Crum, H.A., W.C.  Steere and L.E. Anderson. 1973. A new list of mosses of
     North America north of Mexico.  Bryologist.  76:85-130.
                                   78

-------
Davis, J.B. 1967.  Petroleum Microbiology.  Elsevier Publishing Company,
     Amsterdam.

Deneke, F.J., B.H. McCown, P.I. Coyne, W. Rickard and J. Brown.  1975.
     Biological aspects of terrestrial oil spills - USACRREL oil
     research in Alaska 1970-1974.  Hanover, New Hampshire:  U.S. Army
     Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory.  Research Report
     346.

Duncan, D.G. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics.  11: 1-42.

Freedman, W. and T.C. Hutchinson. 1976. Physical and biological effects
     of experimental crude oil spills on low arctic tundra in the vicinity
     of Tuktoyaktuk, NWT, Canada.  Canadian Journal of Botany.  54:2219-2230.

Funk, H.B. and T.A. Krulwich, 1964. Preparation of clear silica gels
     that can be streaked.  Journal of Bacteriology.  88: 1200-1201.

Gardner, W.H. 1965.  Water content.  In:  Black, C.A. (ed.).  Methods
     of Soil Analysis.  Part 1.  Physical and mineralogical properties
     including statistics of measurement and sampling.  Wisconsin:  American
     Society of Agronomy, pp.82-125.

Greenwood, D.J. 1968.  Measurement of microbial metabolism in soil.  In:
     Gray, T.R.G., and Parkinson, D. (eds.).  The Ecology of Soil Bacteria.
     Liverpool:  University Press, pp.138-157.

Griffiths, E. and M.A. Siddiqi. 1961.  Some factors affecting occurrence
     of Fusarium culmorum in soil.  Transactions of the British Mycological
     Society. 44(33);343-353.

Hale, M.E., Jr. and W.L. Culberson. 1966. A third checklist of the lichens
     of the continental United States and Canada.  Bryologist. 69;141-182.

Horowitz, A. and R.M. Atlas, 1977.  Continuous open flow-through system
     as a model for oil degradation in the Arctic Ocean.  Applied and
     Environmental Microbiology.  33: 647-653.

Hulten, E.  1968.  Flora of Alaska and neighbouring territories.  Stanford,
     California; Stanford University Press, 1008p.

Hunt, P.G.  1972.  The microbiology of terrestrial crude oil degradation.
     Hanover, New Hampshire: U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering
     Laboratory, Special Report  168.

Hunt, P.G., W.E. Rickard, F.J. Deneke, F.R. Koetz and R.P. Murrmann,
      1973.  Biological effects — Terrestrial oil spills in Alaska:
     Environmental effects and recovery.  Reprint from  "Proceedings of
     Joint  Conference on Prevention and  Control of Oil  Spills, March
      13-15,  1973.  Washington, D.C."  (available) Hanover, New Hampshire:
     U.S. Army Cold  Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory.
                                      79

-------
Hutchinson, T.C. and W. Freedman: 1975.  The impact of crude oil spills
     on arctic and subarctic vegetation.  In:   Proceedings of the Circum-
     polar Conference on Northern Ecology, September 15-18.   Ottawa.
     1:175-182.

Hutchinson, T.C. and W. Freedman, 1978.  Effects of experimental crude
     oil spills on subarctic boreal forest vegetation near Norman Wells,
     N.W.T., Canada.  Canadian Journal of Botany 56:2424-2433.

Hutchinson, T.C., J. Hellebust and M. Telford. 1974.  Oil spill effects
     on vegetation and soil microfauna at Norman Wells and Tuktoyaktuk,
     N.W.T.  Environmental-Social Committee, Northern Pipelines, Task
     Force on Northern Oil Development.  Report no. 74-14.  Information
     Canada, cat. No. R57-10/1974, Vancouver,  B.C., Canada.

Jenkins, T.F., L.A. Johnson, C.M. Collins, and T.T. McFadden.  1978.
     The physical chemical and biological effects of crude oil spills
     on Black spruce forest, Interior Alaska.   Arctic 31: 305-323.

Jobson, A., F.D. Cook and D.w.S. Westlake. 1972. Microbial utilization
     of crude oil.  Applied Microbiology, 23:1082-1089.

Johnson, L.F. and E.A. Curl., 1972.  Method for research on the ecology
     of soil-borne plant pathogens.  Minnesota: Burgess Publishing
     Company, pp.106-107.

Kator, H., C.H. Oppenheimer and R.J. Miget. 1971.  Microbial degradation
     of a Louisiana crude oil in closed flasks and under simulated field
     conditions,  proceedings of the Joint Conference on Prevention and
     Control of Oil Spills, American  Petroleum Institute.  Washington,
     D.C., p.287-296.

Leggett, B.C. 1979.  Determination of dissolved nitrogen and oxygen in
     water by headspace gas chromatography.  CRREL Special Report 79-24.

Lehtomaki, M. and S. Niemela.  1975.  Improving microbial degradation of
     oil in soil.  AMBIO. 4 (3):126-130.

Lindholm, G.P. and S.A. Norrell, 1973.  Effects of perturbation nutrient
     addition and oil spillage on soil nitrogen cycling at the College
     hot pipe test site.  Proceedings, Symposium on the Impact of Oil
     Resource Development on Northern Plant Communities.  Fairbanks,
     Alaska:  University of Alaska (Institute of Arctic Biology,
     Occasional Publications on Northern Life No. 1).  pp.72-79.

Linkins, A.E. and R.K. Antibus. 1978.  Ectomycorrhizal fungi of Salex
     rotundifolia Trautu II.  Impact of surface applied Prudhoe Bay
     Crude oil on mycorrhizal root respiration and cold acclimation.
     Arctic  31(3):381-393.
                                     80

-------
Loynachan, T.E. 1978.  Low-temperature mineralization of crude oil in
     soil.  Journal of Environmental Quality 7(4): 494-500.

MacKay, D. and W.Y. Shiu. 1976.  Aqueous Solubility of Weathered
     Northern Crude Oils.  Bulletin of Environmental Contamination
     and Toxicology.  15(1):101-109.

MacKay, D. , M.E. Charles, C.R. Phillips, 1974.  Physical aspects of
     crude oil spills on northern terrain (second report).   Environmental-
     Social Committee, Northern Pipelines, Task Force on Northern Oil
     Development.  Report No. 74-25.  Information Canada.  Cat. No.
     R-57-34/1974.

Martin, J.P. 1950.  Use of acid, rose bengal and streptomycin in the
     plate method for estimating soil fungi.  Soil Science. 69:215-232.

McAuliffe, C.D. 1971.  GC determination of solutes by multiple phase
     equilibrium.  Chemical Technology.  1:46-51.

McAuliffe, C.D. 1977.  Evaporation and solution of C2 to C Q hydrocarbons
     from crude oils on the sea surface.  In: Wolfe, D.A. ted.), "Fate
     and Effects of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in Marine Organisms and
     Ecosystems."  Elmsford, New York:  Pergamon Press, p.363-371.

McCown, B.H., F.J. Deneke, W.E. Rickard, L.L. Tieszen.  1973.  The
     response of Alaskan terrestrial plant communities to the presence of
     petroleum.  In:  Proceedings, Symposium on the Impact of Oil Resource
     Development on Northern Plant Communities.  Occasional Publication
     on Northern Life No. 1., Univ. of Alaska, p.44-51.

McGill, W.B. 1975.  A preliminary model of oil decomposition in soils.
     In:  Proceedings of the Conference on the Environmental Effects of Oil
     and Salt Water Spills on Land, 6-7 November  1975.  Banff, Alberta,
     Canada, University of Calgary and Alberta Environment, University
     of Calgary, Alberta.

McGill, W.B. 1977.  Soil restoration following oil spills-a review.
     Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology.  April-June 1977, p.60-67.

Miller, O.K., Linkins, A.E. and Chemielewski, M.A. 1978.  Fungal biomass
     responses  in oil perturbated tundra at Barrow.  Arctic 31:381-391.

Montegut, J. 1960.  Value of  the dilution method.  In: Parkinson, D. ,
     and Waid,  J.S.  (eds.).   The Ecology of Soil  Fungi:  An International
     Symposium.  Liverpool:   Liverpool University Press, pp.43-52.

Ohmann, L.F. and R.R. Ream.  1971.  Wilderness  ecology:  A method of
     sampling  and  summarizing data  for plant  community classification.
     U.S. Forest  Service Research Paper NC-49.  14p.
                                    81

-------
Parker, C.A. 1955.  Anaerobiosis with iron wool.  Australian Journal of
     Experimental Biology.  33:33-37.

Peech, M. 1965.  Hydrogen-ion activity.  In: Black, C.A. (ed.).  Methods
     of Soil Analysis. Part 2.  Chemical and Microbiological Properties.
     Wisconsin:  American Society of Agronomy, pp.914-926.

Raymond, R.L., J.O. Hudson and V.M. Jamison. 1976.  Oil degradation in
     soil.  Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 31:522-535.

Rickard, W.E. and F. Deneke, 1972.  Preliminary investigations of petro-
     leum spillage, Haines-Fairbanks military pipeline, Alaska, Hanover,
     New Hampshire:  U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering
     Laboratory, Special Report 170.

Rieger, S., C.E. Furbush, D.B. Schoephorster, H. Summerfield, Jr. and
     L.C. Geiger. 1972.  Soils of the Caribou-Poker Creeks Research
     Watershed, interior Alaska.  Hanover, New Hampshire:  U.S. Army
     Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory.  Technical
     Report 236.

Robertson, B., S. Arhelger, P.J. Kinney and D.K. Button. 1973.  Hydro-
     carbon biodegradation in Alaskan waters.  In: Ahearn, D.G. and Meyers,
     S.P.,  (eds.).  The microbial degradation of oil pollutants.
     Baton Rouge, Louisiana:  Louisiana State University (Center for
     Wetland Resources. LSU-S-73-01). pp. 171-184.

Rodina, A.G. 1972.  Methods in Aquatic Microbiology.   (Translated,
     edited and revised by Colwell, R.R. and Zambruski, M.S.).
     Baltimore:  University Park Press,  pp. 255-257.

Scarborough, A.M. and P.W. Flanagan. 1973.  Observations on the effects
     of mechanical disturbances and oil on soil microbial populations.
     Proceedings, Symposium on the Impact of Oil Resource Development
     on Northern Plant Communities.  Fairbanks, Alaska:  University of
     Alaska  (-Insitute of Arctic Biology, Occasional Publications on Northern
     Life No.  1).  pp. 63-71.

Sexstone, A.J. and R.M. Atlas. 1977.  Response of microbial populations
     in Arctic tundra soils to crude oil.  Canadian Journal of Micro-
     biology.  23: 1327-1333.

Teh, J.S. and K.H. Lee.   1973.  Utilization of n-alkanes by Cladosporium
     resinae.  Applied Microbiology.  25:454-457.

Teh, J.S. and K.H. Lee.   1974.  Effects of n-Alkanes on Cladosporium
     resinae.  Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 20: 971-976.
                                    82

-------
Troth, J.L., F.J. Deneke and L.M. Brown. 1975.  Subarctic plant communities
     and associated litter and soil profiles in the Caribou Creek
     Research Watershed, interior Alaska.  Hanover, New Hampshire:
     U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory.
     Research report 330.

Van der Linden, A.C. and G.J.E. Thijsse.  1965.  The mechanisms of microbial
     oxidations of petroleum hydrocarbons.  In Nord, F.F. (e.d.).  Advances
     in Enzymology and Related Subjects of Biochemistry.  Volume 27.
     New York.  Interscience Publishers, pp. 470-546.

Viereck, L.A. and Little, E.L., Jr. 1972.  Alaska trees and shrubs.
     U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Agriculture Handbook
     No. 410, 165 p.

Walker, D.A., P.J. Webber, K.R. Everett, and J. Brown, 1978.  Effects of
     crude and diesel oil spills on plant communities at Prudhoe Bay,
     Alaska and the derivation of oil spill sensitivity maps.  Arctic 31(3):
     242-259,

Warcup, J.H.  1967.  Fungi in soil.  In: Surges, A and RAW, F.  (eds.).
     Soil Biology.  New York:  Academic Press, pp.51-110.

Wein, R.W. and Bliss, L.C. 1973.  Experimental crude oil spills on
     arctic plant communities.  J. Appl. Ecol., 10:671-682.

Zobell, C.E.  1950.  Assimilation of hydrocarbons by micro-organisms.  In
     Nord, F.F.  (e.d.).  Advances in Enzymology and Related Subjects of
     Biochemistry.  Volume 10.  New York.  Interscience Publishers, pp.
     444-486.
                                    83

-------
                   APPENDIX
                      l.25in.
                    (31.75mm)
             Permofrost
          Thermocouple.
                         Wooden Dowel
                                     Moss
                                      Peat
                                   Organic Soil
Interface
                                   Mineral Soil
                     V
Figure A-l.   Vertical  Thermocouple Assembly
                         85

-------
« Oil Flow Probe

D Thermocouple
        Assembly
                 5 — '
                 ICM
                 15-
                20-1    • o  • D  •  a*
                 25-
                 35-
                 45-
               50m-
                                     10m
                       •a* •  •  • «a>
                       •a* •  •  • *r>
                       • a  • a  •  t>
                   i    .   .    .   •
                        a    a    a
                 30-,    .a  • a  •  t>
                        ana
                40— i   »D  • D  •  O*
                        D    a   a
           Figure  A-2.   Spill Sites.
                            86

-------
           TABLE A-l.  AVERAGE SOIL TEMPERATURES

                    (for first 10 meters dcwnslope)
DATE
Thermocouple

  LEVEL  *
                             SPILL
             SUMMER
              SPILL
                                                           CONTROL
6/22/76
7/20/76
 8/12/76
 9/28/76
 6/2/77
 8A6/77
 7/12/78
    5.
    4.
    3.
    2.
    1.

    5.
    4.
    3.
    2.
    1.

    5.
    4.
    3.
    2.
    1.

    5.
    4.
    3.
    2.
    1.

    5.
    4.
    3.
    2.
     1.

     5.
     4.
     3.
     2.
     1.

     5.
     4.
     3.
     2.
     1.
 12.7°C
  3.6
  0.5
- 0.1
- 0.5

 22.5
  6.6
  2.2
  1.3
  0.4

 13.2
  6.3
  2.4
  1.85
  0.7

  6.05
  2.5
  0.95
  0.5
  0.45

  17.4
  6.2
 - 0.3
 - 0.4
 - 0.55

  17.25
  7.0
  3.3
  2.4
  1.1

  23.4
  10.15
  5.0
  3.5
  1.6
 8.8
 3.45
 0.1
-0.35
-0.6

14.3
 6.3
 2.2
 0.7
 0.35

12.1
 6.5
 2.8
 it.2
 0.3

 5.9
 2.25
 0.7
 0.4
-0.1

14.4
 4.7
 0.5
 0.15
-0.2

 21.1
 10.6
  4.85
  2.5
  1.3

 24.5
 15.85
 10.1
  2.0
- 0.1
- 0.4
- 0.5

 12.7
  3.6
  1.05
  0.15
- 0.2

 11.2
  4.0
  1.55
  0.35
- 0.2

  4.9
  1.3
  0.2
- 0.1
- 0.2

  11.4
  1.7
 - 0.05
 - 0.
 - 0.
                                                                .2
                                                                .3
                                                 ,15
                                                 ,8
                                                1.5
  13.15
   5.0
   2.0
   0.7
 - 0.4

  13.6
   5.7
   2.15
   0.3
   0.0
      *See Figure Al,
                                      87

-------
TABLE B-l.  RESULTS FROM SILICA GEL/ALUMINA FRACTIONATION
      OF OILY SOIL EXTRACTS FROM CARIBOU-POKER CREEKS


                     Major Oil components (%)
SAMPLE
Winter Min 7/15/76
Summer Min 7/15/76
Control Min 7/15/76
Winter Organic 7/15/76
Summer Organic 7/15/76
Control Organic 7/15/76
Winter Moss 7/15/76
Summer Moss 7/15/76
Control Moss 7/15/76
Winter Min 9/17/76
Summer Min 9/17/76
Control Min 9/17/76
Winter Organic 9/17/76
Summer Organic 9/17/76
Control Organic 9/17/76
Winter Moss 9/17/76
Summer Moss 9/17/76
Winter Organic 3/29/77
Summer Organic 3/29/77
Control Organic 3/29/77
Alkanes
30.4
22.9
0.9
32.9
33.0
0.7
42.1
37.6
1.1
41.1
27.6
0.5
42.1
33.8
0.2
40.0
40.4
36.6
48.9
0.1
Aromatics
29.4
20.4
1.3
30.0
29.5
2.4
34.4
36.6
0.7
31.8
26.4
1.0
33.1
32.3
0.7
32.4
36.0
34.9
35.9
0.8
Asphalfenes
16.4
34.8
92.8
11.7
13.9
88.5
8.4
7.4
87.0
10.6
18.8
98.0
8.0
14.8
87.8
11.6
8.4
10.7
8.8
93.0
sol.
8.9
13.6
7.2
8.7
8.1
12.0
9.5
12.8
17.9
8.8
10.4
11.3
8.7
8.8
12.3
9.5
8.8
9.5
8.2
6.5
insol.
14.8
8.3
0
16.7
15.4
0
5.6
5.6
0
7.8
16.6
0
8.1
10.4
0
6.4
6.4
8.2
0
0
                         88

-------
TABLE B-l (Cont'd)
SAMPLE
Winter Moss 3/29/77
Summer Moss 3/29/77
Winter Min 4/5/77
Summer Min 4/5/77
Winter Organic 4/5/77
Summer Organic 4/5/77
Winter Moss 4/5/77
Winter Min 7/13/77
Winter Organic 7/13/77
Summer Organic 7/13/77
Winter Moss 7/13/77
Summer Moss 7/13/77
Winter Min 8/1/77
Summer Min 8/1/77
Winter Organic 8/1/77
Summer Organic 8/1/77
Summer Organic 1/5/78
Winter Moss 1/5/78
Summer Moss 1/5/78
Control Moss 1/5/78
Winter Min 6/27/78
Summer Min 6/27/78
Winter Organic 6/27/78
Summer Organic 6/27/78
Alkanes
44.9
36.8
32.2
30.2
37.3
32.6
36.8
31.6
38.2
36.0
34.4
33.1
29.3
19.2
30.6
30.5
32.8
36.3
33.4
0
33.9
26.6
42.0
34.4
Major Oil components (%)
Aromatics Asphalfenes sol.
35.9
37.2
29.7
30.8
29.0
32.5
28.7
30.5
32.6
34.5
34.1
32.6
25.0
24.8
28.0
26.8
37.6
43.4
35.4
6.9
30.6
24.2
32.6
32.6
10.3
10.0
16.7
17.1
-
12.2
-
15.7
11.0
8.0
10.8
12.6
22.9
40.2
19.6
20.1
10.6
9.7
9.2
59.7
16.1
25.0
6.3
8.6
8.4
8.9
12.3
10.8
9.8
13.3
10.6
11.6
10.7
11.0
11.0
11.9
12.0
12.2
12.4
13.0
10.2
9.9
10.9
58.3
10.4
10.0
9.3
10.0
insol.
0.4
7.0
9.1
11.1
-
9.4
-
10.7
7.5
10.4
9.7
9.8
10.8
3.6
9.4
9.6
8.7
0.7
11.1
0
9.2
14.3
9.9
14.4
                                         89

-------
          TABLE B-2.
RESULTS FROM SILICA GEL/ALUMINA FRACTIONATION OF
SAMPLES FROM CARIBOU-POKER (7/27/78)
SAMPLE
               Major Oil components (%)

    Alkanes    Aromatics   Asphalfenes
    NSO
sol.    insol.
S 4-5, 8-9 Moss
S 1-2, 8-9 Moss
S 7, 34 Moss
S 4-5, 8-9 Organic
S 7, 34 Organic
S 1-2, 8-9 Organic
S 1-2, 8-9 Min
S 4-5, 8-9 Min
W 8-9, 11-12 Moss
W 8-9, 11-12 Organic
W 15, 34 Organic
W 8-9, 11, 12 Min
40.8
29.7
35.0
39.6
40.7
39.0
23.9
31.1
35.0
35.2
32.3
35.2
38.3
29.4
36.5
33.0
32.1
32.4
26.7
33.1
36.5
35.7
31.9
32.8
2.1
18.7
6.0
12.2
8.6
12.2
30.5
14.9
6.0
9.3
11.9
15.3
7.1
8.5
7.5
8.5
8.9
8.7
12.1
9.6
8.4
9.0
10.4
6.3
11.8
13.7
15.0
6.8
9.7
7.6
6.9
11.4
14.1
10.9
13.5
10.4
                                        90

-------
TABLE B-3.  RESULTS FROM FRACTIONATION OF SAMPLES FROM OTHER
                      ALASKAN SPILL AREAS
                                         MAJOR OIL COMPONENTS  (%)
LOCATION
Barrow 313
Barrow 311
Barrow 152 D
Fox
Prudhoe Oil
(orig. oil used
for spill)
Prudhoe 2CR
Prudhoe 5 CR
SPILL DATE
1970
1970
1971
1971
July 1976
1976
1976
SAMPLE DATE
July
July
July
July
-
July
July
1977
1977
1977
1976

1977
1977
Alkanes
22
34
31
32
35
37
36
.6
.4
.1
.4
.2
.5
.1
Aroma tics
26
34
32
35
36
35
37
.8
.3
.5
.1
.8
.5
.2
Asphaltenes
20
10
12
10
8
7
7
.6
.8
.1
.8
.4
.1
.7
NSO
Sol. Insol.
14.0
10.9
12.4
10.9
12.1
10.9
9.8
15.9
9.5
11.8
10.9
7.5
8.9
9.2

-------
TABLE B-4.    OIL IN SOIL EXTRACTS  (%)
SAMPLE DATE
7/15/76
9/17/76
3/29/77
4/5/77
7/13/77
8/1/77
1/5/78
6/27/78
Mineral
WIN. SUM.
9.81
6.52
-
4.03
4.70
3.6
-
3.89
1.65
3.85
-
3.38
3.00
1.5
-
1.76
Organic
CON. WIN. SUM.
0.73 89.0
0.45 33.5
24.1
0.10 115
0.10 190
0.2 7.3
-
16.8
57.6
7.09
181
26.9
283
12.4
50.1
31.1
CON.
1.35
2.03
2.29
0.76
0.70
0.6
-
-
Moss
WIN. SUM. CON.
266
249
255
137
234
-
183
-
207 2.49
211 0.91
147 2.12
0.82
194 1.90
-
69.3 -
-
                   92

-------
                               TABLE B-5.  SOIL pH


                      Mineral                      Organic
SAMPLE  DATE	WIN.   SUM.   CON.	WIN.   SUM.  CON.

7/15/76            -                           3.4    3.5   3.5

9/17/76           3.6    3.5    3.6            3.3    3.5   3.2

3/29/77            -                           3.5    3.4   3.5

4/5/77             3.9    4.0    3.9            3.9    3.8   3.8

7/13/77            -      -      -              -       -    3.7
                                          93

-------
                TABLE B-6.   EXCHANGEABLE CATIONS IN SOIL SAMPLES  (meq/100 g)




SAMPLE                        Na+    K+      Ca4"*"     Mg"^    NH.+
Winter Mineral
Summer Mineral
Control Mineral
Winter Organic
Summer Organic
Control Organic
Winter Mineral
Summer Mineral
Control Mineral
Winter Organic
Summer Organic
Control Organic
Winter Organic
Summer Organic
Control Organic
7/15/76
7/15/76
7/15/76
7/15/76
7/15/76
7/15/76
9/17/76
9/17/76
9/17/76
9/17/76
9/17/76
9/17/76
3/29/77
3/29/77
3/29/77
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0



.09
.10
.09
.26
.32
.19
.07
.07
.06
.10
.12
.19
-
-
—
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0



.35
.37
.24
.38
.48
.20
.14
.15
.09
.33
.29
.60
-
-
-
12
15
18
24
89
43
4
6
3
8
13
16



.7
.1
.5
.0
.2
.6
.3
.5
.6
.4
.9
.4
-
-
-
2
3
3
4
13
7
0
1
1
2
3
4



.61
.25
.18
.48
.5
.74
.90
.91
.04
.86
.75
.78
-
-
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.035
.028
.044
.046
.051
.034
.065
.081
.064
.073
.077
.061
.082
.010
.060
                                          94

-------
   I08F
                A| Horizon
   10
o
(0
 o>
o
JS  10
 I
z

    10
    10
                  C2 Horizon
              C  W S
                Jul
C  W S
  Sep
C  W S
  Jul
C  W S
  Sep
         Figure C-l.  1976 MPN counts  (20°C) of denitrifying bacteria in oiled and
                    unoiled (control plots. C = Control Plot; W = Winter Plot;
                    S = Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95% confidence interval.
                                     95

-------
    I08
    I07
 o

 a,  I06
O
 0>
JD
 E
 D
    I04
    I03
                   Ai  Horizon
                                     Horizon
            CWS    CWS     CWS
             Jun      Jul       Aug
                          CWS
                           Jun
CWS
 Jul
CWS
 Aug
       Figure C-2.
1977 MPN counts  (20°C)  of denitrifying bacteria in oiled and
unoiled (control) plots.  C = Control Plot; W = Winter Plot;
S = Sxammer Plot; Brackets represent 95% confidence interval.
                                       96

-------
IU
I07
—
'5
& I06
—
"5
o
«*-
o
v. I05
0)
.Q
E
D
z
I04
I03
^^
•«»
HMI
•BH^^V


•••••••••





	 	
—
—
~_

—
~ 	
ll



•












»
•














A
M

•i






























Horizon

































C W S















«
^









«





»
M
















••







^












»



^v


m












Ca Horizon -:















•
r









«l





^
•1
mm

•





«








••

m,

mm
















mm



»












r















k
mm
c w s c w s c
Jun
Jul
Jun














mm
m




«







»


•
>

•


•







	 3
—
—
. —I
•^

••


m










—
.
^^
_
_
"
— —
—
W S
Jul
Figure C-3.  1978 MPN counts (20°C) of denitrifying bacteria in oiled and
             unoiled (control) plots.  C = Control Plot; W = Winter Plot;
             S = Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95% confidence interval.
                                   97

-------
    10
    10
       6
01  io7
CO


-------
       8
10° E
         r     A.  Horizon
-  '°7
o
(0


X
(0
0)

3  I06
o»
o
a
o
u.
QL
 °  10



 E

z


    10
    10
                                        C2 Horizon
             C W  S

               Jul
                       C WS

                         Sep
C  WS

  Jul
C  WS

 Sep
        Figure C-5.  1976 MPN counts (20°C) of cellulose-utilizing fungi in oiled and

                   unoiled (control) plots.  C = Control Plot; W = Winter Plot;

                   S = Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95% confidence interval.
                                    99

-------
I08
I07
o
0)
to
o>
u
*»-
o
i io5
JD
E
IO4
10 3

r A
- —
—
—
—
—
—
«
••
«
•i
•
•
m
-
«

•
Horizon
^
-i
»




•i




•

•
^
•1
•
•

»
••
*
mi
«
»
Ml
»
•


•
•





c

•1

mm
«
2 Horizon i
«
m
MI
MI
M
M
Mi
»
•i
•H

•
••

v
•1

Ml
»
Mi
•
Mi
•

W
••
m
mm
^

^
•

— =
—
—
—
—
—
CWS CWS CWS CWS
Jul
Sep J
ul
Sep
Figure C-6.  1976 MPN counts (20°C) of oil utilizing-bacteria in oiled and
             unoiled (control)  plots.  C = Control Plot; W = Winter Plot;
             S = Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95% confidence interval.
                                   100

-------
IU
I07
o
(0
S
o
I
D
z
I04
10 3
mm*
mmm
mm
••
mm
••••
•MHMMB
M»
•^•V
^•>
••»
•••»
^i*
^^^M
^^B
••
i*^»
••••
•••>
•^•^
	
	

•
mm
m
A,

••
•>
• ••

m
mm
^
Horizon
•>
•M
•>

V
••1
«

•
mt
m
m
••
•

••
•

v
MM

•
••I



C2 Horizon

^
r

•
•1
•••
•
•
••
•
C WS C WS C W
Jul Sep Ju

«
•

»
•>


S

^
••
•

•
Hi
HI

••1
*

mm
•

M

— r
*

—
—

—
—
cw s
Sep
Figure 07.  1976 MPN counts (20°C) of oil-utilizing-yeasts in oiled and
             unoiled (control) plots.  C = Control Plot; W = Winter Plot;
             S = Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95% confidence interval.
                                   101

-------
     I08
     I07
 o
(O
    I06
—

o
»*—
 O
 i_
 CD
-O
 E
    I05
    I04
    I03
          r    AI Horizon
                                       C2 Horizon  -f
             CWS
             1977
                        CWS
                        1978
CWS
 1977
CWS
1978
       Figure C-8.  1977 and 1978 MPN counts (20°C) of oil-utilizing-bacteria in
                 oiled and unoiled (control) plots.  C = Control Plot; W =
                 Winter Plot; S = Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95% confidence
                 interval.
                                 102

-------
I08
I07
I06
o
«4-
 o
 \_
 
-------
    I08
 o
en
 en
 -  io6
o
Q.
O

-------
IU'
I06
"6
V)
o>
\
C/> |Q5
0)
of Propagul
o
*
V.
Q>
.a
E
D
z
I03
I02
mmmm*
E- A Horizon •
mmmmm
mm
mmmm*
ffffffgfff.
mmt
mmmmm
mmt
IM^B
^»
i^^M
IB*
•^^
•••
••••
^^»
^^M
mm
m^m
mm
—
—
•I-
• •
J-





• •


^p
• m













m
m
m



m
m




•
•




m
m
•










Cz Horizon -:

•




•
*



•
•
•


m
m
m



m
•
•
»


•
•



•
•
»






•
• mm
•L


•
•



•
M
m


	





—
"
•
mmmm
•i
••
•••
••
m
mmmmm
mmM
mmmm
mtm
mmmmmmmmm
mml
mm^*l
••••
^mmmm
•••••







C WS C WS C WS C WS
1977 1978 1977 978
Figure C-ll. 1977 and 1978 MPN counts (20°C) of oil-utilizing fungi
in oiled and unoiled (control) plots. C = Control Plot;
W = Winter Plot; S = Summer Plot; Brackets represent 95%
confidence interval.
105

-------
     TABLE C-l.  20°C HETEROTROPHIC BACTERIAL COUNTS ( x 106/ g  soil)
                 IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS
Sampling
time
1976
February3
June
Julyb
August
September

February a
June,
July5
August
September
1977
June
July
Augus t

June
July
August
1978
June
July

June
July
Control
plot

12
27
28
16
13

7
11
9
8
3

29
18
22

6
4
2

24
25

10
6
winter
plot
AI Horizon
11
300**
440**
280**
260**
&2 Horizon
5**
8
42**
24**
19*
AI Horizon
720**
330**
180**
C-2 Horizon
44**
94**
55*
AI Horizon
370**
380**
C2 Horizon
72**
56-«-'«
Summer
plot

18*cc
570**cc
1300**cc

7cc
28**
280**cc

1800**cc
1200**cc
880**cc

280**cc
170**cc
150**cc

700**cc
370**

71**
34** cc
 a Within 24 hours after the winter oil spill.
 b Within 24 hours after the summer oil spill.
 * Significantly different from the control at 5% level.
** Significantly different from the control at 1Z level.
cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
                                   106

-------
     TABLE C-2.  20°C FILAMENTOUS FUNGAL PROPAGULE COUNTS (x 104/g soil)
                          IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS
Sampling
time
1976
February3
June
Julyb
August
September

February3
June
Julyb
August
September
1977
June
July
August

June
July
August
1978
June
July

June
July
Control
plot

100
230
160
110
62

25
33
13
20
7

270
170
150

35
10
22

170
160

25
26
Winter
plot
AI Horizon
160
15**
27**
80V
72
C-2 Horizon
8**
3**
n.d.
5**
3**
A]_ Horizon
47**
41**
21**
G£ Horizon
20**
8
A-j_ Horizon
420>*
500**
G£ Horizon
26
34**
Summer
plot

60** cc
75**
460**cc

35**
ll**c
91**cc

300cc
210*cc
180*cc

29**cc
20**cc
18** cc

470**
420**cc

n.ci.
37**
 a Within 24 hours after the winter oil spill.
 b Within 24 hours after the summer oil spill.
n.d. Not determined.
 * Significantly different from the control at 5% level,
** Significantly different from the control at 1% level,
 c Significantly different from the winter at 5% level.
cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
                                   107

-------
     TABLE C-3.  20°C YEAST COUNTS (X 105/g soil) IN OILED AND
                          UNOILED (CONTROL)  PLOTS
Sampling
time
1976
Februarya
June
Julyb
Augus t
September

February3
June
Julyb
August
September
1977
June
July
August

June
July
August
1978
June
July

June
July
Control
plot

5.4
8.1
2.7
7.0
11

1.2
1.0
0.6
1.4
1.1

3.1
5.1
4.0

0.7
0.2
1.2

14
12

1
2
Winter
plot
AI Horizon
7.2
790**
120**
340**
220**
C2 Horizon
1.2
8.6**
/ •H** *^
25**
22**
AI Horizon
210**
330**
250**
C2 Horizon
53**
53**
48**
AI Horizon
3100**
3200**
C2 Horizon
410**
280**
Summer
plot

5cc
1500**cc
1800**cc

0.6cc
110**cc
590**cc

3100**cc
5200**cc
2900** cc

930**cc
400**cc
500**cc

3400**
2400**cc

390**
160**cc
 a Within 24 hours after the winter oil spill.
 b Within 24 hours after the summer oil spill.
** Significantly different from the control at 1% level,
cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
                                    108

-------
     TABLE C-4.  20°C PROTEOLYTIC BACTERIAL COUNTS (x 105/g soil) IN
                 OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS IN 1976
Sampling
time

February4
June
Julyb
August
September

February4
June
Julyb
August
September
Control
plot

67
200
68
34
24

16
25
17
8.1
8.2
Winter
plot
A-^ Horizon
60
1300**
800**
150**
630**
C2 Horizon
9.5
61
210**
n.d.
64**
Summer
plot

-
-
110**cc
3900**cc
4000** cc

-
-
40**cc
250**
1400**cc
 a Within 24 hours after the winter oil spill.
 b Within 24 hours after the summer oil spill.
** Significantly different from the control at 1% level,
cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
n.d. Not determined.
                                 109

-------
      TABLE C-5.  20°C ANAEROBIC BACTERIAL COUNTS (x105/g soil) IN
                  OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL)PLOTS IN 1976
Sampling
time

Julya
September

Julya
September
Control
plot

40
13

7.7
4.8
Winter
plot
AI Horizon
72*
60**
£>2 Horizon
14**
11**
Summer
plot

19**cc
1200**cc

9.9cc
21**cc
 a Within 24 hours after "the summer oil spill.
 * Significantly different from the control at 5% level.
** Significantly different from the control at 1% level.
cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
                                 110

-------
TABLE C-6.  20°C IN VITRO SOIL RESPIRATION RATES (mg CO /24 HR/100 g soil)
                 IN OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS
Sampling
time
1976
**
February
Julyb
August
September

a
February
Julyb
August
September
1977
June
July
August

June
July
August
1978
June
July
Control
plot

104.0
39.8
25.8
21.6

10.0
12.2
7.8
5.6

61.6
40.5
65.2

7.3
9.9
9.2

41.0
11.1
Winter
plot
AI Horizon
49.4**
97.4**
42.0**
48.8**
C? Horizon
3.2**
20.2**
15.4**
18.0**
AI Horizon
90.8**
55.7**
54.0**
C9 Horizon
11.4**
14.3**
15.0**
AI Horizon
68.8**
17.2**
Summer
plot

146.0**cc
88.2**cc
121.0**cc

15. Oc
9.0c
33.6**cc

223.8**cc
136.2**cc
128.7**cc

37.5**cc
17.9**cc
19.8**cc

82.5**cc
14.4*
  a Within 24 hours after the winter oil spill.
  b Within 24 hours after the summer oil spill.
  * Significantly different from the control at  5% level.
 ** Significantly different from the control at  1% level.
  c Significantly different from the winter at 5% level.
 cc Significantly different from the winter at 1% level.
                                 Ill

-------
TABLE C-7.  pH OF SOIL COLLECTED FROM OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS
Sampling
time
1976
Februarya
June
Julyb
August
September

February a
June
Julyb
Augus t
September
1977
June
July
August

June
July
August
1978
June
July

June
July
Control
plot

4.8
5.6
5.5
5.4
5.2

5.2
5.0
5.1
5.3
5.3

5.2
4.8
5.1

5.2
5.0
5.2

4.9
4.8

5.2
5.0
Winter
plot
AI Horizon
5.5
5.7
6.2
5.7
5.7
C.2 Horizon
5.2
5.5
5.2
5.5
5.6
AI Horizon
4.9
5.1
5.5
C-2 Horizon
5.2
5.2
5.2
A! Horizon
5.4
5.2
C2 Horizon
5.4
5.0
Summer
plot

—
— —
6.1
5.5
5.7

—
— —
5.3
5.7
5.9

5.3
5.4
5.6

5.4
5.2
5.2

5.2
5.3

5.4
5.2
  a Within 24 hours after the winter oil spill.
  b Within 24 hours after the summer oil spill.
                                  112

-------
TABLE C-8.  CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND REGRESSION EQUATIONS RELATING IN VITRO
            SOIL RESPIRATION RATES TO BACTERIAL NUMBERS IN OILED AND UNOILED
            (CONTROL) PLOTS IN 1977a.
Rregression
equation b                        Treatment           n               r


                                      4°C

Y  =  6.67 + 2.06X                 Control              6           0.831*
Y  =  8.56 + 0.04X                 Winter               6           0.959**
Y  =  7.90 + 0.05X                 Summer               6           0.927**
Y  =  9.31 + 0.05X                 All                 18           0.927**

                                      20°C
Y = 0.25 + 2.36X
Y =12.71 + 0.12X
Y = 2.28 * 0.12X
Y = 19.34 * 0.11X
Control
Winter
Summer
All
6
6
6
18
0.959**
0.938**
0.990**
0.943**
 a June, July, August data  in both  soil horizons  were used.
 b Y = mg C02/24 hr/lOOg soil; X =  106 bacterial  cells/g  soil.


 *    Significant  at 57. level.
 **  Significant  at 1% level.
                                 113

-------
 TABLE C-9.   CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND REGRESSION EQUATIONS RELATING IN VITRO
             SOIL RESPIRATION RATES TO BACTERIAL NUMBERS IN OILED AND UNOILED
             (CONTROL)  PLOTS IN 1976a.
Regression
equation b
Treatment
                    n
                                      4°C
Y =  2.27 + 1.72X
Y =  7.10 + 0.03X
Y =  8.60 + 0.05X
Y =  6.09 + 0.05X
Control
Winter
Summer
All
 6
 6
 6
18
0.892*
0.863*
0.860*
0.858**
                                      20°C
Y =  0.05 + 1.45X
Y = 10.20 + 0.17X
Y =49.19 •*- 0.05X
Y = 30.51 + 0.08X
Control
Winter
Summer
All
 6
 6
 6
18
0.980**
0.952**
0.466
0.566*
a July, August  and  September data in both soil horizons were used.
b Y  = mg  CO  /24 hr/lOOg soil; X = bacterial cells x 106/g soil.


* Significant at 52  level.
** Significant at 1% level.
                                114

-------
TABLE C-10. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND  REGRESSION EQUATIONS  RELATING IN  VITRO
            SOIL RESPIRATION RATES  TO  FILAMENTOUS  FUNGI  PROPAGULE COUNTS IN
            OILED AND UNOILED  (CONTROL) PLOTS  IN 1976a-
  Regression
  equation b                       Treatment           n                r


                                       4°C

  Y =  3.47 + 0.04X                Control              6            0.724
  Y =  5.47 + 0.53X                Winter               6            0.822*
  Y =  7.52 + 0.30X                Summer               6            0.806
  Y=  7.37O.15X                All                 18            0.504*

                                       20°C

  Y =  6.13 + 0.21X                Control              6            0.980**
  Y = 34.91 + 0.25X                Winter               5            0.277
  Y = 47.86 + 0.17X                Summer               6            0.500
  Y = 28.39 + 0.21X                All                 17            0.520*
  a  July,  August,  and September data in both soil horizons were used.
  b  Y  = mg C07/24  hr/100 g soil; X = 104 filamentous fungal propagules/g soil.


  * Significant at 52 level.
  ** Significant at 1% level.
                                  115

-------
TABLE C-ll. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND REGRESSION EQUATIONS RELATING  IN VITRO
            SOIL RESPIRATION RATES TO FILAMENTOUS FUNGI PROPAGULE COUNTS IN
            OILED AND UNOILED (CONTROL) PLOTS IN 1977a.
 Regression.
 equation b                        Treatment
                                       4°C

 Y =  2.82 •*• 0.17X                 Control              6           0.980**
 Y = 10.01 + 0.78X                 Winter               6           0.933**
 Y =  1.14 + 1.58X                 Summer               6           0.906*
 Y = 15.50 + 0.18X                 All                 18           0.283

                                       20°C
Y = 6.72
Y = -4.44
Y = 7.80
Y * 15.20
+ 0.23X
+ 1.77X
+ 0.68X
+ 0.46X
Control
Winter
Summer
All
6
6
6
18
0.894*
0.843*
0.995**
0.794**
  a June, July and August data  in both  soil horizons were used.
  b Y = mg CO-/24 hr/100 g soil; X =  10^  filamentous fungal propagules/g soil.

 *   Significant at 5Z level.
 **  Significant at 1Z level.
                                  116

-------
TABLE C-12. -CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND REGRESSION EQUATIONS RELATING IN VITRO
             SOIL RESPIRATION RATES TO YEAST NUMBERS III OILED AND UNOILED
             (CONTROL) PLOTS IN 1976a.
Regression
equation b                        Treatment
                                      4°C

Y =  1.91 + 4.26X                 Control              6           0.710
Y =  6.89 + 0.25X                 Winter               6           0.792
Y =  7.45 + 0.04X                 Summer               6           0.853*
Y =  7.62 + 0.04X                 All                 18           0.837**

                                      20°C
Y = 14.26 + 1.12X
Y = 29.47 + 0.09X
Y = 48.67 + 0.03X
Y = 31.12 + 0.04X
Control
Winter
Summer
All
6
6
6
18
0.374
0.382
0.412
0.545*
a July, August  and September data in both soil horizons were used.
b Y = mg C02/24 hr/100  g soil;  X = 105 yeast cells/g soil.


*   Significant at 52 level.
**  Significant at 1Z level.
                                   117

-------
TABLE C-13. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND REGRESSION EQUATIONS RELATING  IN VITRO
            SOIL RESPIRATION RATES TO YEAST NUMBERS IN OILED AND UNOILED
            (CONTROL) PLOTS IN 1977a.
    Regression
    equation b
Treatment
    Y =  5.49 + 3.46X
    Y =  9.03 + 0.72X
    Y =  8.19 + ).51X
    Y =  9.96 + 0.50X
    4°C

Control
Winter
Summer
All

    20°C
 6
 6
 6
18
0.781
0.964**
0.985**
0.964**
Y = 6.04
Y = 8.52
Y = 21.44
Y = 31.43
+ 11.01X
+ 0.20X
+ 0.03X
+ 0.03X
Control
Winter
Summer
All
6
6
6
18
0.800
0.768
0.768
0.775**
    a June, July and August data in both soil horizons were  used.
    b Y = mg O>2/24 hr/100 g soil; X =  105 yeast  cells/g  soil.


    ** Significant at 12 level.
                                       118

-------
TABLE C-14. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND  REGRESSION EQUATIONS  RELATING  IN  VITRO
            SOIL RESPIRATION RATES  TO  OIL CONCENTRATIONS  IN  OILED  PLOTS IN 1976a.
   Regression
   equation b                        Treatment
                                        4°C

   Y  =  5.58  + 1.53X                 Winter               6            0.879*
   Y  =  9.85  + 1.84X                 Summer               6            0.607
   Y  =  7.13  + 1.84X                 All                 12            0.643*

                                        20°C

   Y  =  2.71  + 10.21X                Winter               6            0.990**
   Y  = 14.36  + 11.92X                Summer               6            0.958**
   Y  =  6.19  + 11.72X                Both                12            0.945**


   a July, August  and September data  in both soil horizons were used.
   b Y = mg  C02/24 hr/100  g soil;  X = % oil in soil.


   *    Significant  at  52 level.
   **  Significant  at  1% level.
                                     119

-------
TABLE C-15. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND REGRESSION EQUATIONS RELATING IN VITRO
            SOIL RESPIRATION RATES TO OIL CONCENTRATIONS IN OILED PLOTS  IN  1976a,
 Regression
 equation b
Treatment
                    n
 Y =  5.62 + 2.17X
 Y = 11.29 + 2.85X
 Y =  6.60 + 2.89X
    4°C

Winter
Summer
Both

    20°C
 6
 6
12
0.980**
0.970**
0.949**
Y = 5.52
Y = 29.39
Y = 12.80
+ 7.33X
•f 8.53X
•*• 8.82X
Winter
Summer
Both
6
6
12
0.917**
0.943**
0.922**
  a  June,  July and August data in both soil horizons were used.
  b  Y  =  mg C02/24 hr/100 g soil;  X = % oil in soil.


 ** Significant at 1% level.
                                    120

-------
TABLE C-16. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND REGRESSION  EQUATIONS RELATING BACTERIAL
            NUMBERS TO OIL CONCENTRATIONS IN OILED PLOTS  IN  1976a.
   Regression
   equation b                        Treatment           n
                                         4°C

   Y = -51.29 + 54.11X               Winter               6           0.997**
   Y = 161.37 +  9.06X               Summer               6           0.164
   Y =  80.34 •*• 23.04X               Both                12           0.421

                                         20°C

   Y = -30.90 + 56.08X               Winter               6           0.980**
   Y = 259.92 + 22.46X               Summer               6           0.210
   Y = 124.15 + 35.14X               Both                12           0.359


   a July, August and September  data in both soil horizons were used.
   b Y = 106 bacterial  cells/g soil;  X = % oil in soil.
   ** Significant at 1% level.
                                        121

-------
TABLE C-17. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND REGRESSION EQUATIONS RELATING BACTERIAL
            NUMBERS TO OIL CONCENTRATIONS IN OILED  PLOTS IN 1977a.
     Regression
     equation b                        Treatment           n                r


                                           4°C

     Y = -56.40 + 47.76X               Winter               6            0.975**
     Y = 108.04 + 55.20X               Summer               6            0.964**
     Y =  -4.70 + 57.30X               Both                12            0.938**

                                           20°C

     Y = -62.69 + 63.35X               Winter               6            0.980**
     Y = 222.43 •*• 69.21X               Summer               6            0.949**
     Y =  40.30 + 73.38X               Both                12            0.917**
     a June, July and August data  in both  soil  horizons were used.
     b Y = 106 bacterial cells/g soil;  X = %  oil in soil.
     ** Significant at 1% level.
                                        122

-------
                                                                    BACIESIAL
Regression
equation b                       Treatment
                                      4°C

Y = 12.77 + 21.05X                Winter               4            0.995**
Y = -7.64 + 36.56X                Summer               4            0.889
Y = -4.48 + 29.79X                Both                 3            0.854**

                                      20°C
Y = -8.98
Y = 4.35
Y = -8.47
+ 41.92X
+ 58.40X
+ 50.96X
Winter
Summer
Both
4
4
8
1.000**
0.975*
0.943**
a June and July data in both soil horizons were  used,
b Y = 106 bacterial cells/g soil; X =  %  oil  in soil.


*   Significant at 5% level.
**  Significant at 1Z level.
                                   123

-------
TABLE C-19. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND REGRESSION EQUATIONS RELATING BACTERIAL
            NUMBERS TO OIL CONCENTRATIONS IN OILED PLOTS IN 1978a.
     Regression
     equation b                        Treatment           n               r


                                           4°C

     Y  = -4.20 +  2.49X                Winter               6            0.938**
     Y  =  8.37 +  1.55X                Summer               6            0.922**
     Y  =  2.61 +  1.82X                Both                12            0.889**

                                           20°C
Y = 8.71 + 3.30X
Y = 35.65 «• 11.95X
Y = 3.08 + 11.73X
Winter
Summer
Both
6
6
12
0.812*
0.911*
0.831**
     a June,  July and August data in both soil horizons were «•£•
     b Y = 10* filamentous fungal propagules/g soil; X = /» oil in sou.
      *   Significant at  51 level.
      **  Significant at  1% level.
                                          124

-------
TABLE C-20. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS  AND  REGRESSION EQUATIONS  RELATION
            FILAMENTOUS FUNGAL  PROPAGULE  COUNTS  TO OIL CONCENTRATIONS
            IN OILED PLOTS  IN  1978a.
Regression
equation b
Treatment
Y = 3.29 + 1.66X
Y = 7.05 + 4.55X
Y = 4.14 + 3.23X
    4°C

Winter
Summer
Both

    20°C
4
4
8
0.990**
0.990**
0.762*
Y = -68.76 + 57.57X
Y = 33.54 •*• 43.63X
Y = -22.62 + 50.70X
Winter
Summer
Both
4
3
7
0.985*
0.990
0.975**
 a June and July data in both soil horizons were used.
 b Y = 10^ filamentous fungal propagules/g soil; X = % oil in soil.
*   Significant at 5% level.
**  Significant at LZ level.
                                      125

-------
   TABLE C-21. CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND REGRESSION EQUATIONS RELATION
               YEAST NUMBERS TO OIL CONCENTRATIONS IN OILED PLOTS IN 1977a.
Regression
equation b

Y = -4.22 +
Y = 5.25 +
Y = -5.44 +


2.92X
5.56X
5. SIX
Treatment
4°C
Winter
Summer
Both
n

6
6
12
r

0.980**
0.995**
0.938**
 Y =   88.42  +  14.56X
 Y = 1274.73  + 118.41X
 Y =  366.12  •*• 129.73X
                                      20°C
Winter
Summer
Both
 6
 6
12
0.480
0.574
0.538
a June, July and August data in both soil horizons were  used.
b Y = 105 yeast cells/g soil; X = % oil  in soil.
 ** Significant at 1Z  level.
                                      126

-------
TABLE C-22.
CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS AND REGRESSION EQUATIONS RELATING
YEAST NUMBERS TO OIL CONCENTRATIONS IN OILED PLOTS IN 1978a.
Regression
equation b
                     Treatment
                                        n
Y =  5.62 +  2.73X
Y = -3.30 + 22.72X
Y = -7.27 + 13.37X
                         4°C

                     Winter
                     Summer
                     Both

                         20°C
4
4
8
0.894
0.889
0.616
Y = -312.54
Y = 78.97
Y = -72.12
+ 377. 99X
+ 304. 45X
+ 334. 38X
Winter
Summer
Both
4
4
8
0.998**
0.998**
0.992**
 a June and July data in both soil horizons were used.
 b Y  =  10^ yeast cells/g soil; X = % oil in soil.
**  Significant at 1% level.
                                      127

-------
                                   TECHNICAL REPORT DATA
                            (Please read Instructions on the reverse before completing)
1. REPORT NO.
 EPA-600/3-80-040
                             2.
                                                           3. RECIPIENT'S ACCESSION NO.
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
  The Fate and  Effects of Crude Oil Spilled  on Subarctic
  Permafrost Terrain in Interior Alaska
                                                            5. REPORT DATE
                                                            March 1980 issuing  date
             6. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION CODE
7. AUTHOR(S)
  L.A.Johnson,  E.B.Sparrow, T.F.Jenkins,  C.M.Collins,
  C.V.Davenport,  T.T.McFadden
                                                           8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION REPORT NO.
9. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME AND ADDRESS
  U.S.Army Cold  Regions Research and Engineering
      Laboratory
  Fairbanks, Alaska 99703
             10. PROGRAM ELEMENT NO.
               1BA820
             11. CONTRACT/GRANT NO.
              Grant # EPA-IAF-D7-0794
12. SPONSORING AGENCY NAME AND ADDRESS
  Environmental  Research Laboratory—Corvallis,  OR
  Office of Research and Development
  Environmental  Protection Agency
  Corvallis, Oregon 97330
             13. TYPE OF REPORT AND PERIOD COVERED
               final  1975-1979
             14. SPONSORING AGENCY CODE
               EPA/600/02
15. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
16. ABSTRACT
  This study was  conducted to determine both  the short- and long-term effects of spills
  of hot Prudhoe  Bay crude oil on permafrost  terrain in subarctic interior Alaska.  Two
  experimental oil  spills of 7570 liters  (2000  gallons) each on 500m^ test plots were
  made at a forest  site underlain by permafrost near Fairbanks, Alaska.   The oil spills,
  one in winter and one in summer, were conducted to evaluate their  effect during these
  two seasonal extremes.  Oil movement, thermal regime, botanical effects, microbiologi-
  cal responses,  permafrost impact, and composition of the oil in the soil were monitor-
  ed for two years.

  The results indicate that oil movement  during the winter spill occurred within the
  surface moss layer beneath the snow.  In  the  summer spill, movement of  the oil was
  primarily below the moss in the organic soil.   The oil movement in the  summer spill
  was more rapid, moving 30 m downslope in  the  first 24 hours and 41 m total through the
  summer.  The oil  in the winter spill moved  only 18 m downslope in  the first day and
  stopped.  Remobilization occurred in the  spring allowing the oil in the winter spill
  to move an additional 17 m.  The total  area affected by the summer spill was nearly
  one and one-half  times as large as the  winter spill (303 m^ Vs 188 m^ or 40 m^/nP of
  oil ;vs 24 m2/m3 of
17.
                                KEY WORDS AND DOCUMENT ANALYSIS
                  DESCRIPTORS
                                              b.IDENTIFIERS/OPEN ENDED TERMS
                           c. cos AT I Field/Group
  Alaska
  Oil spill
  Permafrost
  Subarctic
                            06/C
                            06/F
                            08/L
18. DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT

     Release to public
19. SECURITY CLASS (ThisReport)
 unclassified     	
21. NO. OF PAGES
 142
                                              20. SECURITY CLASS (Thispage)
                                                unclassified
                                                                         22. PRICE
EPA Form 2220-1 (Key. 4-77)   PREVIOUS EDITION is OBSOLETE
                                                          U. S. GOVERNMENT POINTING OFFICE: 1980-698-311 /I34 REGION 10
                                            128

-------